Mayor and City Council
May 21, 2025

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 644
CC30 SP56 - AD 1050
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0142-243-26 $372.80 0142-243-27 $372.80 0142-243-28 $372.80 0142-243-29 $372.80 0142-243-30 $372.80 0142-243-31 $372.80 0142-243-32 $372.80 0142-243-33 $372.80 0142-243-34 $372.80 0142-243-35 $372.80 0142-243-36 $372.80 0142-243-37 $372.80 0142-243-38 $372.80 0142-243-39 $372.80
Totals Parcels 14 Levy $5,219.20
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 645
CC30 SP57 - AD 1052
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0261-701-01 $316.82 0261-701-02 $316.82 0261-701-03 $316.82 0261-701-04 $316.82 0261-701-05 $316.82 0261-701-06 $316.82 0261-701-07 $316.82 0261-701-08 $316.82 0261-701-09 $316.82 0261-701-10 $316.82 0261-701-11 $316.82 0261-701-12 $316.82 0261-701-13 $316.82 0261-701-14 $316.82 0261-701-15 $316.82 0261-701-16 $316.82 0261-701-17 $316.82 0261-701-18 $316.82 0261-701-19 $316.82 0261-701-20 $316.82 0261-701-21 $316.82 0261-701-22 $316.82 0261-701-23 $316.82 0261-701-24 $316.82 0261-701-25 $316.82 0261-701-26 $316.82 0261-701-27 $316.82 0261-701-28 $316.82 0261-701-29 $316.82 0261-711-01 $316.82 0261-711-02 $316.82 0261-711-03 $316.82 0261-711-04 $316.82 0261-711-05 $316.82 0261-711-06 $316.82 0261-711-07 $316.82 0261-711-08 $316.82 0261-711-09 $316.82 0261-711-10 $316.82 0261-711-11 $316.82 0261-711-12 $316.82 0261-711-13 $316.82 0261-711-14 $316.82 0261-711-15 $316.82 0261-711-16 $316.82 0261-711-17 $316.82 0261-711-18 $316.82 0261-711-19 $316.82 0261-711-20 $316.82 0261-711-21 $316.82 0261-711-22 $316.82 0261-711-23 $316.82 0261-711-24 $316.82 0261-711-25 $316.82 Totals Parcels 54 Levy $17,108.28
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 646
CC30 SP59 - AD 1054
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0151-411-01 $459.88 0151-411-02 $459.88 0151-411-03 $459.88 0151-411-04 $459.88 0151-411-05 $459.88 0151-411-06 $459.88 0151-411-07 $459.88 0151-411-08 $459.88 0151-411-09 $459.88 0151-411-10 $459.88 0151-411-11 $459.88 0151-411-12 $459.88 0151-411-13 $459.88 0151-411-14 $459.88 0151-411-15 $459.88 0151-411-16 $459.88 0151-411-17 $459.88 0151-411-18 $459.88 0151-411-19 $459.88 0151-411-20 $459.88
0151-411-21 $459.88 0151-411-22 $459.88
Totals Parcels 22 Levy $10,117.36
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 647
CC30 SP63 - AD 1055
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0261-731-01 $715.44 0261-731-02 $715.44 0261-731-03 $715.44 0261-731-04 $715.44 0261-731-05 $715.44 0261-731-06 $715.44 0261-731-07 $715.44 0261-731-08 $715.44 0261-731-09 $715.44 0261-731-10 $715.44 0261-731-11 $715.44 0261-731-12 $715.44 0261-731-13 $715.44 0261-731-14 $715.44 0261-731-15 $715.44 0261-731-16 $715.44 0261-731-17 $715.44 0261-731-18 $715.44 0261-731-19 $715.44 0261-731-20 $715.44 0261-731-21 $715.44 0261-731-22 $715.44 0261-731-23 $715.44 0261-731-24 $715.44 0261-731-25 $715.44 0261-731-26 $715.44 0261-731-27 $715.44 0261-731-28 $715.44 0261-731-29 $715.44 0261-731-30 $715.44 0261-731-31 $715.44 0261-731-32 $715.44 0261-731-33 $715.44 0261-731-34 $715.44 0261-731-35 $715.44 0261-731-36 $715.44 0261-731-37 $715.44 0261-731-38 $715.44 0261-731-39 $715.44 Totals Parcels 39 Levy $27,902.16
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 648
CC30 SL10 - AD 1056
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0261-741-01 $565.38 0261-741-02 $565.38 0261-741-03 $565.38 0261-741-04 $565.38 0261-741-05 $565.38 0261-741-06 $565.38 0261-741-07 $565.38 0261-741-08 $565.38 0261-741-09 $565.38 0261-741-10 $565.38 0261-741-11 $565.38 0261-741-12 $565.38 0261-741-13 $565.38 0261-741-14 $565.38 0261-741-15 $565.38 0261-741-16 $565.38 0261-741-17 $565.38 0261-741-18 $565.38 0261-741-19 $565.38 0261-741-20 $565.38 0261-741-21 $565.38 0261-741-22 $565.38 0261-741-23 $565.38 0261-741-24 $565.38 0261-741-25 $565.38 0261-741-26 $565.38 0261-741-27 $565.38 0261-741-28 $565.38 0261-741-29 $565.38 0261-741-30 $565.38 0261-741-31 $565.38 0261-741-32 $565.38 0261-741-33 $565.38 0261-741-34 $565.38 0261-741-35 $565.38 0261-741-36 $565.38 0261-741-37 $565.38 0261-741-38 $565.38
Totals Parcels 38 Levy $21,484.44
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 649
CC30 SL01 - AD 1057
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0148-011-49 $726.44 0148-011-50 $2,343.62 0148-011-53 $2,551.12 0148-011-54 $7,578.48 0148-011-55 $471.62 0148-011-65 $6,546.80 0148-011-66 $5,492.74 0148-011-68 $5,325.82 0148-011-69 $1,975.48 Totals Parcels 9 Levy $33,012.12
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 650
CC30 SL02 - AD 1059
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0280-241-08 $240.96 0280-241-09 $39.68 0281-041-64 $149.90 0281-041-65 $209.90 0281-041-66 $968.00 0281-041-67 $595.20 Totals Parcels 6 Levy $2,203.64
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 651
CC30 SP60 - AD 1060
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0272-311-11 $1,145.96 0272-311-12 $1,145.96 0272-311-13 $1,145.96 0272-311-14 $1,145.96 0272-311-15 $1,145.96
Totals Parcels 5 Levy $5,729.80
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 652
CC30 SL03 - AD 1063
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0280-181-48 $1,139.74 0280-181-49 $549.80 0280-181-50 $1,302.12 0280-181-51 $1,980.56 0280-181-52 $124.62 0280-181-53 $53.40 0280-181-54 $226.66 0280-181-55 $3,422.72
Totals Parcels 8 Levy $8,799.62
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 653
CC30 SL04 - AD 1064
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0262-011-48 $7,304.94 0262-011-49 $3,663.92 0262-011-50 $629.12 0262-011-51 $12,021.54 0348-151-25 $22,814.56
Totals Parcels 5 Levy $46,434.08
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 654
CC30 SL08 - AD 1068
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0136-361-36 $4,842.60 0136-361-37 $490.28 0136-361-39 $2,720.50 0136-361-40 $941.64 0136-371-39 $4,065.22
0280-251-65 $1,544.74 0280-251-67 $224.42
Totals Parcels 7 Levy $14,829.40
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 655

Appendix B:

Assessment Diagrams
Packet Page. 656

OHIO AVE

WALNUT AVE

REDWOOD CT

ALEXIS CT

SPENCER CT

BEECHWOOD AVE
BAILEY
CREEK
CHAN
NEL
CH

MEYERS RD

YOUNGSTOWN LN

BETHANY WAY
0 140 28070 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1028
Landscaping 28,190 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 657
16TH ST

PENNSYLVANIA ST

ARIZONA ST
17TH ST

CLYDE ST

GLENVIEW ST

CALFORNIA ST
0 100 20050 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1029
Landscaping 12,074 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 658

GARFIELD ST

CHESTNUT AVE

CAITLIN ST

OHIO ST
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1030
Landscaping 22,425 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 659

BRENDA LN

STEPHANIE AVE
S.B.C.F.C.D.

STDR

NORMA LN

LORI LN

LINDA LN
0 140 28070 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1031
Landscaping 80,000 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 660

VERDEMONT DR

ZACHARY
CT

HUNTINGTON DR

MELVIN AVE
0 150 30075 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1032
Landscaping 21,280 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 661

OHIO AVE

MEYERS RD
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1035
ZONE 1
Landscaping 30,475 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 662

PALM AVE

COMSTOCK RD

AKRON ST
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1035
ZONE 2
Landscaping 1,650 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 663
STATE 15 HWY

KENDALL DR
ASH ST

NORTHPARK
BLVD

SYCAMORE
STRE

SYCAMORE ST
VALLES
DR

GINKGO ST

UNIVERSITY
PARK
WAY

CAMPUSPKWY
0 400 800200 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036
Landscaping 1,615,182 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 664

BELMONT AVE
C0LEEN LN

CHRISANN CIR

MEYERS RD

DARLING LN
0 100 20050 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1037
Landscaping 29,207 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 665
S.B.C.F.C.D. CHANNEL CH

ORANGE SHOW RD

ARROWHEAD AVE

SIERRA WAY

ORANGE SHOW LN
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1038
Landscaping 75,380 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 666

IRVINGTON AVE

BELMONT AVE

WADE CT
CABLE
CREEK

CHANNEL

MEYERS RD

CHESTNUT
AVE
0 200 400100 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1039
Landscaping 40,425 sq. ft. Trail/Hardscape 39,975 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê

MAGNOLIA AVE
Packet Page. 667
ACACIA
CT
59TH ST

ACACIA AVE

MAYFIELD AVE

ARIES LN
0 140 28070 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1040
Landscaping 72,665 sq. ft. Fuel Mod 97,480 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 668

MAGNOLIA AVE

MEYERS RD

CAITLIN ST

OHIO ST
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1041
Landscaping 46,771 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 669

GLENWOOD CT

PINEWOOD
WAY

AMBERWOOD CT

SHADY CREEK
DR

SHANDIN
HILLS
DR

MULECREEKCT

HURD CREEK WAY

KENDALL DR
0 140 28070 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1042
Landscaping 187,800 sq. ft. Fuel Mod 229,330 sq. ft. Detention Basin

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 670

IRVINGTON AVE

COLD MOUNTAIN WAY

ANGELS PEAK DR
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1043
ZONE 1
Landscaping 22,770 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê

PALM AVE
Packet Page. 671

OLIVE AVE
MOUNT

CARMELA
LN

SPLIT MOUNTAIN LN

MUIR MOUNTAIN WAY

EAGLES GLEN ST

AKRON ST
0 140 28070 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1043
ZONE 2
Landscaping 46,495 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 672

WATERMAN AVE

AT & SF RR

PARKCENTER
CIR
0 150 30075 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1045
Landscaping 9,560 sq. ft. Hardscape 2,684 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 673
SUN
VALLEY
DR
Northstar Stre
NORTH
PARK
BLVD
Brighton Cour
0 100 20050 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1046
Landscaping 9,560 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 674

ASHLEY CT

PINE AVE
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1047
Landscaping 14,205 sq. ft. Trail 14,668 sq. ft. Fuel Mod. 2,102 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 675

RANDALL AVE

EUCALYPTUS AVE

PENNY LN
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1048
Landscaping 13,953 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 676
0 100 20050 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1049
Landscaping 7,788 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê

OHIO AVE

CHESTNUT AVE

N SHELBY CT
Packet Page. 677

RIALTO AVE

AT & SF

PEPPER AV
0 100 20050 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1050
Landscaping 5,155 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 678
0 100 20050 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1051
Landscaping 690 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê

OHIO AVE

BELMONT AVE

OLIVE AVENUE
Packet Page. 679

BELMONT AVE

MEYERS RD

CHESTNUT AVE

SHANON LN
0 150 30075 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1052
Landscaping 32,519 sq. ft. Trail 21,313 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 680
NORTH
COLONY
WAY

VALLES DRIV
CAMPUS
PKWY
0 100 20050 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1054
Landscaping 28,265 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 681

OHIO AVE
ASHTON
CT
NORTH
COLONY
WAY

CHRISTINE
ST
AUBREY

BELMONT AVE

REDWOOD ST

CHRISTOPHER ST

PINE AVE

AKRON ST

KENDALL DR
0 350 700175 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1055
Landscaping 120,680 sq. ft. Catch Basin 4 Sewer Lift

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 682

MAGNOLIA AVE

ANTIQUE
ST

CATHEDRAL CT

VERDEMONT DR

GARFIELD ST

BAROQUE CT

OHIO ST
0 140 28070 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1056
Detention Basin Landscaping 41,325 sq. ft. Fuel Mod

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 683

INTERCHANGE
DR

MIKE DALEY DR
CAJON BLVD §¨¦215
0 290 580145 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1057
Landscaping 188,261 sq. ft. Detention Basin

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 684

TIPPECANOE (
ORIG)
AVE
SANTA
ANA
RIV

TIPPECANOE AVE
COOLEY
AVE

GAGE CL
ORANGE
SHOW
RD

TIPPECANOE AVE
0 140 28070 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1059
Landscaping 7,073 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 685

DATE ST

CHIQUITA LN
0 90 18045 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1060
Landscaping 6,747 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 686

CENTRAL AVE
SANTA
ANA
RIV

NORMAN RD

CLEVENGER DR

LENA RD
VALLEY
VIEW
AVE

ORANGE SHOW RD
0 250 500125 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1063
Landscaping 160,173 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 687
SBCFCD
A.T.&S.F.

RR
GLEN
HELEN
PKWY

CAJON BLVD
§¨¦215
0 400 800200 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1064
Landscaping 304,508 sq. ft.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 688

SAN BERNARDINO AVE

MOUNTAIN
VIEW A
VE

RIVERVIEW DR

SANTA ANA RIV

STERLING AVE

TIPPECANOE AVE
0 600 1,200300 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1068
Landscaping 37,982 sq. ft. Detention Basin 1 Storm Drain 1

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 689

Appendix C:

MAD District Cost Summary
Packet Page. 690
MAD No. 1028 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $9,309.94 $9,496.13 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $330.26 $336.86
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,997.08 $3,057.02 Total Direct Costs $12,637.27 $12,890.02
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,018.68 $1,080.72
City Administration $1,187.84 $1,187.84
Auditor-Controller $22.80 $22.80
Total Indirect Costs $2,229.32 $2,291.36
Total Costs $14,866.59 $15,181.38
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $70.30
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution ($1,211.43) ($1,252.96)
General Benefit Contribution ($136.01) ($138.89)
Total Adjustments ($1,347.44) ($1,321.55)
Total Assessment $13,519.15 $13,859.83
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 691
MAD No. 1029 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $4,333.00 $4,419.66
Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $287.10 $292.84
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,733.20 $1,767.86 Total Direct Costs $6,353.30 $6,480.36
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $494.48 $524.59
City Administration $432.71 $432.71
Auditor-Controller $11.40 $11.40
Total Indirect Costs $938.59 $968.70
Total Costs $7,291.88 $7,449.06
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $4.24 $264.37
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($532.31) ($543.78)
Total Adjustments ($528.07) ($279.41)
Total Assessment $6,763.82 $7,169.65
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 692
MAD No. 1030 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $4,324.88 $4,411.38 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $96.43 $98.36
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,162.44 $2,205.69 Total Direct Costs $6,583.75 $6,715.43
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $562.77 $597.04
City Administration $389.37 $389.37
Auditor-Controller $14.10 $14.10
Total Indirect Costs $966.24 $1,000.51
Total Costs $7,549.99 $7,715.94
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $414.24 $716.92
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($266.56) ($272.42)
Total Adjustments $147.67 $444.50
Total Assessment $7,697.66 $8,160.44
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 693
MAD No. 1031 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $15,741.88 $16,056.71
Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $393.55 $401.42
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $6,296.74 $6,422.68 Total Direct Costs $22,432.16 $22,880.81
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $2,106.38 $2,234.66
City Administration $1,953.86 $1,953.86
Auditor-Controller $32.10 $32.10
Total Indirect Costs $4,092.34 $4,220.62
Total Costs $26,524.50 $27,101.43
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $1,429.71 $1,557.23
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00
Total Adjustments $1,429.71 $1,557.23
Total Assessment $27,954.21 $28,658.66
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 694
MAD No. 1032 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,993.16 $3,053.03 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $351.64 $358.68
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,496.58 $1,526.51 Total Direct Costs $4,841.39 $4,938.22
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $544.69 $577.86
City Administration $405.99 $405.99
Auditor-Controller $19.20 $19.50
Total Indirect Costs $969.87 $1,003.35
Total Costs $5,811.26 $5,941.56
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $1,638.34 $2,078.74
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00
Total Adjustments $1,638.34 $2,078.74
Total Assessment $7,449.60 $8,020.30
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 695
MAD No. 1035 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $7,596.14 $7,748.06 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $623.15 $635.61
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $3,798.06 $3,874.03 Total Direct Costs $12,017.35 $12,257.70
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $989.79 $1,050.07
City Administration $1,104.09 $1,104.09
Auditor-Controller $9.00 $9.00
Total Indirect Costs $2,102.87 $2,163.16
Total Costs $14,120.22 $14,420.85
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution ($799.19) ($307.73)
General Benefit Contribution ($185.34) ($189.28)
Total Adjustments ($984.52) ($497.01)
Total Assessment $13,135.70 $13,923.84
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 696
MAD No. 1035 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $662.90 $676.16 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $100.44 $102.45
Irrigation Costs (water and energy) $331.45 $338.08
Total Direct Costs $1,094.79 $1,116.69
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $153.18 $162.51
City Administration $178.14 $178.14
Auditor-Controller $3.90 $3.90
Total Indirect Costs $335.22 $344.55
Total Costs $1,430.02 $1,461.24
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $674.41 $695.98
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($71.50) ($73.06)
Total Adjustments $602.91 $622.91
Total Assessment $2,032.92 $2,084.15
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 697
MAD No. 1036 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $5,336.49 $5,443.22
Maint. of Groundcover/Shrubs/Irrigation/Slope/DG Trails $58,493.13 $59,663.00 Maint. of Fuel-Mod Slope/Irrigation/Drain. Ditches/DG Trails $15,751.59 $16,066.62 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,770.56 $1,805.97
Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument Signs and Lighting $1,627.87 $1,660.42 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $76,266.96 $77,792.30 Maintenance of Maxwell Drains $10,555.64 $10,766.75
Maintenance of Exercise Stations/Gazebos/Benches $3,067.02 $3,128.36 Total Direct Costs $172,869.26 $176,326.65
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $19,708.74 $20,909.00
City Administration $12,697.66 $12,697.66
Auditor-Controller $75.00 $75.00
Total Indirect Costs $32,481.40 $33,681.66
Total Costs $205,350.66 $210,008.30
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $59,658.30 $61,670.85
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($3,451.10) ($3,530.04)
Total Adjustments $56,207.20 $58,140.81
Total Assessment $261,557.86 $268,149.11
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 698
MAD No. 1037 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $1,500.19 $1,530.20
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,844.04 $2,900.92 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $371.85 $379.28
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,172.12 $2,215.56 Total Direct Costs $6,888.20 $7,025.96
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $448.98 $476.32
City Administration $149.82 $149.82
Auditor-Controller $9.90 $9.90
Total Indirect Costs $608.70 $636.04
Total Costs $7,496.90 $7,662.01
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution ($1,126.51) ($918.08)
General Benefit Contribution ($228.66) ($233.69)
Total Adjustments ($1,355.17) ($1,151.77)
Total Assessment $6,141.73 $6,510.24
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 699
MAD No. 1038 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Landscape Maintenance $5,202.00 $5,306.04
Total Direct Costs $5,202.00 $5,306.04
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $272.52 $289.12
City Administration $0.00 $0.00
Auditor-Controller $10.80 $10.80
Total Indirect Costs $283.32 $299.92
Total Costs $5,485.32 $5,605.96
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $50.10 $67.69
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($394.94) ($403.63)
Total Adjustments ($344.84) ($335.94)
Total Assessment $5,140.48 $5,270.02
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 700
MAD No. 1039 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $1,053.52 $1,074.59
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $6,044.54 $6,165.43 Maintenance of 3 Rail Trail Separation Vinyl Fence $209.19 $213.37 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $877.93 $895.48
Maintenance of Hardscape/Monument Signs/Trail/Lighting $2,389.18 $2,436.96 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $3,549.02 $3,620.00 Total Direct Costs $14,123.38 $14,405.85
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,164.85 $1,235.79
City Administration $593.39 $593.39
Auditor-Controller $38.10 $38.10
Total Indirect Costs $1,796.34 $1,867.28
Total Costs $15,919.72 $16,273.13
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $704.87 $1,322.81
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($691.17) ($706.51)
Total Adjustments $13.70 $616.30
Total Assessment $15,933.42 $16,889.43
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 701
MAD No. 1040 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $5,476.79 $5,586.33 Maintenance of SBFCD Fuel-Mod Thinning Area $3,673.44 $3,746.91 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $376.69 $384.23
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,190.52 $2,234.33 Total Direct Costs $11,717.44 $11,951.79
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,316.19 $1,396.34
City Administration $492.42 $492.42
Auditor-Controller $13.80 $13.80
Total Indirect Costs $1,822.40 $1,902.56
Total Costs $13,539.85 $13,854.35
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $3,927.56 $4,053.23
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00
Total Adjustments $3,927.56 $4,053.23
Total Assessment $17,467.40 $17,907.58
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 702
MAD No. 1041 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $1,398.48 $1,426.45 Maintenance of Slope Area $3,695.72 $3,769.64
Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $989.50 $1,009.30
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $3,702.44 $3,776.49 Total Direct Costs $9,786.15 $9,981.87
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $928.26 $984.79
City Administration $746.56 $746.56
Auditor-Controller $5.10 $5.10
Total Indirect Costs $1,679.92 $1,736.45
Total Costs $11,466.07 $11,718.32
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $1,348.06 $1,860.25
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($115.81) ($118.36)
Total Adjustments $1,232.25 $1,741.90
Total Assessment $12,698.32 $13,460.22
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 703
MAD No. 1042 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $34,406.16 $35,094.28 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,221.38 $1,245.81
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $18,349.94 $18,716.94 Maintenance of City Fuel-Mod Thinning Area $11,203.92 $11,428.00 Total Direct Costs $65,181.40 $66,485.03
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $5,813.76 $6,167.82
City Administration $6,889.83 $6,889.83
Auditor-Controller $21.60 $21.60
Total Indirect Costs $12,725.19 $13,079.25
Total Costs $77,906.59 $79,564.28
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution ($750.88) ($464.24)
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00
Total Adjustments ($750.88) ($464.24)
Total Assessment $77,155.71 $79,100.04
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 704
MAD No. 1043 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $4,603.56 $4,695.63
Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $404.36 $412.45
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,841.43 $1,878.25 Total Direct Costs $6,849.34 $6,986.33
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $648.55 $688.04
City Administration $619.73 $619.73
Auditor-Controller $12.30 $12.30
Total Indirect Costs $1,280.58 $1,320.07
Total Costs $8,129.92 $8,306.40
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $1,030.85 $1,083.28
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($553.78) ($565.80)
Total Adjustments $477.07 $517.48
Total Assessment $8,606.99 $8,823.89
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 705
MAD No. 1043 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $9,541.89 $9,732.73 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $41.04 $41.86
Irrigation Costs (water and energy) $3,816.75 $3,893.08 Total Direct Costs $13,399.67 $13,667.67
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,178.73 $1,250.51
City Administration $1,096.58 $1,096.58
Auditor-Controller $14.10 $14.10
Total Indirect Costs $2,289.40 $2,361.19
Total Costs $15,689.08 $16,028.85
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $552.88
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution ($45.93) $0.00
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00
Total Adjustments ($45.93) $552.88
Total Assessment $15,643.14 $16,581.73
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 706
MAD No. 1045 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $7,475.12 $7,624.63
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $1,286.61 $1,312.34 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,843.15 $1,880.01
Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument Signs and Lighting $347.29 $354.24 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $4,380.87 $4,468.49 Total Direct Costs $15,333.05 $15,639.71
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $867.67 $920.51
City Administration $1,027.26 $1,027.26
Auditor-Controller $3.90 $3.90
Total Indirect Costs $1,898.83 $1,951.67
Total Costs $17,231.88 $17,591.39
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $0.00
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution ($3,132.12) ($3,147.52)
General Benefit Contribution ($2,584.78) ($2,638.71)
Total Adjustments ($5,716.90) ($5,786.23)
Total Assessment $11,514.98 $11,805.16
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 707
MAD No. 1046 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,249.25 $3,314.23 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $849.70 $866.69
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,299.69 $1,325.68 Total Direct Costs $5,398.63 $5,506.61
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $520.60 $552.31
City Administration $613.12 $613.12
Auditor-Controller $5.70 $5.70
Total Indirect Costs $1,139.43 $1,171.13
Total Costs $6,538.06 $6,677.74
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $625.98 $665.85
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($254.98) ($260.43)
Total Adjustments $370.99 $405.42
Total Assessment $6,909.05 $7,083.16
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 708
MAD No. 1047 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,457.22 $2,506.36 Maintenance of Thinning Area $121.20 $123.62
Maintenance of Hardscape and Trail $468.12 $477.49
Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $576.61 $588.14
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,638.15 $1,670.91 Total Direct Costs $5,261.30 $5,366.53
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $523.42 $555.29
City Administration $485.79 $485.79
Auditor-Controller $2.40 $2.40
Total Indirect Costs $1,011.61 $1,043.48
Total Costs $6,272.91 $6,410.01
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $887.21 $1,179.72
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00
Total Adjustments $887.21 $1,179.72
Total Assessment $7,160.12 $7,589.73
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 709
MAD No. 1048 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $2,342.99 $2,389.85 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,119.47 $1,141.85
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $1,249.59 $1,274.58 Total Direct Costs $4,712.05 $4,806.29
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $588.43 $624.27
City Administration $496.39 $496.39
Auditor-Controller $6.00 $6.00
Total Indirect Costs $1,090.83 $1,126.66
Total Costs $5,802.87 $5,932.95
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $2,312.00 $2,666.34
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($65.67) ($67.14)
Total Adjustments $2,246.33 $2,599.20
Total Assessment $8,049.20 $8,532.15
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 710
MAD No. 1049 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $0.00 $2,439.15 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $0.00 $1,564.09
Maintenance of Drainage Easement $0.00 $2,278.09
Total Direct Costs $0.00 $6,281.33
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $0.00 $500.00
City Administration $0.00 $744.60
Auditor-Controller $0.00 $4.50
Total Indirect Costs $0.00 $1,249.10
Total Costs $0.00 $7,530.43
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $85.83
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 ($250.05)
Total Adjustments $0.00 ($164.21)
Total Assessment $0.00 $7,366.22
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 711
MAD No. 1050 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $1,057.01 $1,078.15
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $209.81 $214.00 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $2,088.98 $2,130.76
Irrigation Costs (water and energy) $633.42 $646.08
Total Direct Costs $3,989.22 $4,069.00
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $359.94 $381.86
City Administration $345.68 $345.68
Auditor-Controller $4.20 $4.20
Total Indirect Costs $709.82 $731.74
Total Costs $4,699.04 $4,800.74
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $890.51 $1,098.64
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($665.75) ($680.16)
Total Adjustments $224.76 $418.48
Total Assessment $4,923.80 $5,219.23
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 712
MAD No. 1052 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $4,999.74 $5,099.74 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $5,073.70 $5,175.17
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,499.88 $2,549.88 Maintenance of AC/DG Trail System $1,319.81 $1,346.20
Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument, Trail, Lighting, Wall, Fence $743.11 $757.97 Maintenance of Vinyl Trail Separation Fence $417.99 $426.35 Total Direct Costs $15,054.23 $15,355.31
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,179.91 $1,251.76
City Administration $710.19 $710.19
Auditor-Controller $16.20 $16.20
Total Indirect Costs $1,906.30 $1,978.15
Total Costs $16,960.53 $17,333.46
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $743.01 $1,372.88
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($1,562.94) ($1,597.30)
Total Adjustments ($819.93) ($224.43)
Total Assessment $16,140.60 $17,109.04
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 713
MAD No. 1054 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $848.57 $865.54
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $3,204.79 $3,268.89 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $762.41 $777.66
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $2,026.68 $2,067.22 Maintenance of Hardscape, Monument Signs and Lighting $227.89 $232.44 Total Direct Costs $7,070.34 $7,211.75
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $743.63 $788.92
City Administration $753.30 $753.30
Auditor-Controller $6.60 $6.60
Total Indirect Costs $1,503.53 $1,548.82
Total Costs $8,573.87 $8,760.57
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $2,101.38 $2,180.94
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($806.37) ($823.92)
Total Adjustments $1,295.02 $1,357.02
Total Assessment $9,868.89 $10,117.59
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 714
MAD No. 1055 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Turf/Irrigation $10,059.91 $10,261.11
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation/ DG Trail $5,230.75 $5,335.37 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $2,117.28 $2,159.62
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $5,110.27 $5,212.47 Annual Lease Costs for Maintenance of MWD Property $1,409.25 $1,437.44 Total Direct Costs $23,927.46 $24,406.00
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,924.21 $2,041.40
City Administration $1,243.81 $1,243.81
Auditor-Controller $11.70 $11.70
Total Indirect Costs $3,179.72 $3,296.91
Total Costs $27,107.18 $27,702.91
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $1,926.20 $2,969.54
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($2,710.72) ($2,770.29)
Total Adjustments ($784.52) $199.25
Total Assessment $26,322.66 $27,902.16
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 715
MAD No. 1056 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $319.07 $325.45 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $346.00 $352.92
Maintenance of Detention Basin $858.76 $875.94
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $335.48 $342.19
Total Direct Costs $1,859.32 $1,896.51
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,579.08 $1,675.25
City Administration $1,804.66 $1,804.66
Auditor-Controller $11.40 $11.40
Total Indirect Costs $3,395.14 $3,491.31
Total Costs $5,254.46 $5,387.81
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $15,817.68 $16,215.37
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($115.78) ($118.72)
Total Adjustments $15,701.90 $16,096.65
Total Assessment $20,956.36 $21,484.46
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 716
MAD No. 1057 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $9,041.75 $9,222.59 Maintenance of Trees/Irrigation $1,613.64 $1,645.91
Detention Basin Vegetation Abatement $2,115.74 $2,158.05 Detentioin Basin Maintenance $3,772.84 $3,848.30
Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $4,520.87 $4,611.29 Total Direct Costs $21,064.84 $21,486.13
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $2,711.47 $2,876.60
City Administration $0.00 $0.00
Auditor-Controller $2.70 $2.70
Total Indirect Costs $2,714.17 $2,879.30
Total Costs $23,779.01 $24,365.43
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $10,852.17 $10,305.67
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($1,618.98) ($1,658.91)
Total Adjustments $9,233.19 $8,646.77
Total Assessment $33,012.20 $33,012.20
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 717
MAD No. 1059 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Maintenance of Ground Cover/Shrubs/Irrigation $1,489.36 $1,519.15 Irrigation Costs (Water and Energy) $794.33 $810.21
Total Direct Costs $2,283.69 $2,329.36
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $181.00 $192.02
City Administration $36.78 $36.78
Auditor-Controller $1.80 $1.80
Total Indirect Costs $219.58 $230.60
Total Costs $2,503.26 $2,559.96
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $75.91 $27.72
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($375.49) ($383.99)
Total Adjustments ($299.58) ($356.28)
Total Assessment $2,203.68 $2,203.68
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 718
MAD No. 1060 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Landscape Maintenance $4,100.40 $4,182.41
Utilities Costs $1,764.70 $1,799.99
Total Direct Costs $5,865.10 $5,982.40
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $211.27 $224.14
City Administration $114.56 $114.56
Auditor-Controller $1.50 $1.50
Total Indirect Costs $327.33 $340.20
Total Costs $6,192.43 $6,322.60
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $0.00 $29.06
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution ($603.40) ($621.79)
General Benefit Contribution $0.00 $0.00
Total Adjustments ($603.40) ($592.72)
Total Assessment $5,589.03 $5,729.87
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 719
MAD No. 1063 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Landscape Maintenance $8,323.20 $8,489.66
Total Direct Costs $8,323.20 $8,489.66
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $404.98 $429.65
City Administration $0.00 $0.00
Auditor-Controller $2.40 $2.40
Total Indirect Costs $407.38 $432.05
Total Costs $8,730.58 $8,921.71
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $4.31 $85.43
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 ($11.76)
General Benefit Contribution ($191.48) ($195.68)
Total Adjustments ($187.17) ($122.00)
Total Assessment $8,543.41 $8,799.71
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 720
MAD No. 1064 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Landscape Maintenance $52,572.02 $53,623.46
Utilities Costs $7.69 $7.84
Total Direct Costs $52,579.71 $53,631.30
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $667.04 $707.66
City Administration $0.00 $0.00
Auditor-Controller $1.50 $1.50
Total Indirect Costs $668.54 $709.16
Total Costs $53,248.25 $54,340.46
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $31.74 $244.74
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($7,987.24) ($8,151.07)
Total Adjustments ($7,955.49) ($7,906.33)
Total Assessment $45,292.75 $46,434.13
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 721
MAD No. 1068 FY 2025-26 Budget
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Landscape Maintenance $15,912.00 $16,230.24
Detention Basin Vegetation Abatement/Slope Repair $1.60 $1.63 Detention Basin Maintenance Cost - 25 Cubic Yards $6.03 $6.15 Storm Drain Maintenance Cost $7.23 $7.38
Total Direct Costs $15,926.86 $16,245.40
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $88.92 $94.34
City Administration $0.00 $0.00
Auditor-Controller $2.10 $2.10
Total Indirect Costs $91.02 $96.44
Total Costs $16,017.89 $16,341.84
Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $40.66 $113.46
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($1,593.61) ($1,625.84)
Total Adjustments ($1,552.94) ($1,512.38)
Total Assessment $14,464.94 $14,829.46
Estimated through June 30
Packet Page. 722

Packet Page. 723

Preliminary Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2025-26

Maintenance Assessment Districts
Volume 5

Packet Page. 724
Table of Contents
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26

Sections
i. Introduction i

1. Plans and Specifications 1

2. Cost Estimates 2

3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment 6

4. Engineer’s Signature 12

5. Assessment Diagram 13

6. Assessment Rolls 14

Tables
Table 2-1 MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget 3
Table 2-2 MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget 4
Table 2-3 MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 FY 2025-26 Budget 5
Table 3-1 Maximum Assessment Rates 10

Appendices
Appendix A – Assessment Rolls
Appendix B – Assessment Diagram
Packet Page. 725
i. Introduction Page | i
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26

AGENCY: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PROJECT: MAINTENANCE ASSESSMEN T DISTRICTS ENGINEER REPORT TO: CITY COUNCIL

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ENGINEER’S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE "ASSESSMENT LAW"
Pursuant to direction from the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of San Bernardino (the “City”), State of Californi a, submitted herewith is the Engineer’s Report (the “Report”) for Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022 (the “District”), consisting of the following parts, pursuant to the Charter of the City of San Bernardino and Secti on 19 of Article 16 and in compliance with Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California (the “Assessment Law”), and which is in accordance with Resolution No. 2025-___ adopted by the City of San Bernardino City Council, San Bernardino County, California ordering preparation of this Report. This Report is appl icable for the ensuing 12-month period, being the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2026.

Section 1 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS including a general description of the maintenance and plans of the landscaping, irrigation systems and street lighting proposed to be funded.

Section 2 A COST ESTIMATE of maintaining the landsca ping, irrigation systems and street lighting including incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is as set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto.

Section 3 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT contains the method of apportionment of assessments, indicating the proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the improvements upon several lots and parcels of land within the District, in proporti on to the estimated benefits to be received by such lots and parcels.

Section 5 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM showing the District, the lines and dimensions of each parcel of land within said District, as the same exists on the maps of the County of San Bernardino Assessor for Fiscal Year 2025-26, is filed in the offices of the City of San Bernardino. An Assessment Diagram of each zone can be found in Appendix B.

Section 6 ASSESSMENT ROLLS showing the actual assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s Office can be found in Appendix A.

Maintenance
Assessment District Name
Actual
Assessment
per Unit ($)
Maximum Assessment
per Unit ($)
MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance-California $118.58 $217.10 MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance-California $132.83 $132.83 MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 San Bernardino International Airport/Alliance-California $107.31 $127.14 Packet Page. 726
i. Introduction Page | ii
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26

Background
The City Council of the City of San Bernardino approved the form ation of MAD No. 1022 in 2006. The District was formed pursuant to the requirements of the Assessment Law.

The District was formed to provide a source of funds for the improvements which may include, but are not limited to: landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, turf, irrigation and drai nage systems, trails, hardscapes, walls, si te lighting and appurtenant facilities. T he Report sets forth the methodology to be used in apportioning the assessment to the different land use types within the City based upon the benefit they receive.

There are 13 commercial parcels within Zone 1. There are 10 commercial parcels within Zone 2. There are 17 commercial parcels within Zone 3. No further subdivision of the parcels is anticipated.

The boundaries of MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows:

The centerline of Tippecanoe Avenue on the west, the centerline of 3 rd Street to the north, the centerline of Leland
Norton Way to the east and the San Bernardino International Airport to the south.

The boundaries of MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows:

The centerline of Lena Road to the west, the centerline of Mill Street to the south and the centerline of Tippecanoe Avenue to the east.

The boundaries of MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 are shown on the Assessment Diagram located in Appendix B of this Report and is generally described as follows:

The centerline of Mill Street to the north, the centerline of Tippecanoe Avenue to the east and the centerline of Central Avenue to the south.

Parcels within this District are assessed their proportionate share of the cost for the maintenance of local improvements inclu ding, but not limited to, landscaping facilities. These improvements provide a special benefit to those parcels due to their nature and l ocation.

Designation of Maintenance Assessment District/Zones:

For your reference, you can find the following Maintenance Assessment Districts within the corresponding Volumes listed below:

Volume 1: MAD 951 (Zone 1), MAD 951 (Zone 2), MAD 952 (Zone 1, 2 and 2A), MAD 952 (Zone 3), MAD 953, MAD 956, MAD 959 (Zone 1), MAD 962, MAD 963, MAD 968, MAD 974, MAD 975, MAD 976, MAD 981, MAD 982, MAD 986, MAD 989, MAD 991, MAD 993, MAD 997, MAD 1001, MAD 1002, MAD 1005, MAD 1007, MAD 1012, and MAD 1016. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 1 and does not contain an annual escalator.

Volume 2: MAD 1017, MAD 1019, MAD 1020, MAD 1023 and MAD 1024. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 2 and does contain an annual CPI escalator only.

Volume 3: MAD 1025 and MAD 1027. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 3 and has a 25% general benefit of major arterial streets, 20% general benefit of secondary arterial streets, 15% general benefit of collector streets, and 100% special benefit of the local streets. These Maintenance As sessment Districts listed are contained in Volume 3 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefit requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts.

Volume 4: MAD 1028, MAD 1029, MAD 1030, MAD 1031, MAD 1032, MAD 1035 (Zone 1), MAD 1035 (Zone 2), MAD 1036, MAD 1037, MAD 1038, MAD 1039, MAD 1040, MAD 1041, MAD 1042, MAD 1043 (Zone 1), MAD 1043 (Zone 2), MAD 1045, MAD 1046, MAD 1047, MAD 1048, , MAD 1049, MAD 1050, MAD 1051, MAD 1052, MAD 1054, MAD 1055, MAD 1056, MAD 1057, MAD 1059, MAD 1060, MAD 1063, MAD 1064, and MAD 1068. These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 4 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less.

Packet Page. 727
i. Introduction Page | iii
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26

Volume 5: MAD 1022 (Zone 1), MAD 1022 (Zone 2) and MAD 1022 (Zone 3). These Maintenance Assessment Districts listed are contained within Volume 5 and contains an annual escalator of 5% or CPI, whichever is less with other direct and special benefi t requirements only pertaining to these Maintenance Districts.

Packet Page. 728
i. Introduction Page | iv
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26

Current Annual Administration
As required by the Assessment Law, the Report includes: (1) a description of the improvements to be operated, maintained and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District.

The City of San Bernardino will hold a Public Hearing on July 16, 2025, regarding the District which will provide an opportunit y for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the assessment rates as originally proposed or as modified.

Payment of these annual assessments for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for their annual property taxes. All funds collected through the assessments must be placed in a special fund and can only be u sed for the purposes stated within this Report.

Packet Page. 729

1. Plans and Specifications Page | 1
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Description of Improvements
This Report provides information specific to the parcels within the boundaries of Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022 Zone 1. The improvements to be maintained include 89,550 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree), st reetlighting and all appurtenances along portions of Tippecanoe Avenue, Harry Shepard Boulevard, Del Rosa Drive, Third Street and Leland Norton Way. Street lighting sha ll also include traffic signals and all appurtenances thereto.

In Zone 2 the improvements to be maintain ed include 22,200 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree), streetlighting and all appurtenances along portions of Lena Road Mill Street and Tippeca noe Avenue. Street lighting shall also include traffic signals and all appurtenances thereto.

In Zone 3 the improvements to be maintained include 5,657 sq. ft. of landscaping (including one tree), streetlighting and all appurtenances along portions of Mill St reet, Tippecanoe Avenue and Central Avenue. Street li ghting shall also include traffic signals and all appurtenances thereto.

An Assessment Diagram showing the maintained area is provided in Appendix B of this Report.

Packet Page. 730

2. Cost Estimates Page | 2
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
The cost estimate contains each of the items specified in the Assessment Law.

The Assessment Law provides that the estimated costs of the impr ovements shall include the total cost of the improvements for t he entire Fiscal Year 2025-26, including incidental expenses, which may include operating reserves.

The Assessment Law also provides that the amount of any surplus, deficit, or contribution be included in the estimated cost of improvements. The net amount to be assessed on the lots or parcels within the District is the total cost of installation, maintenance, and servicing with adjustments either positive or negative for reserves, surpluses, deficits, and/or contributions.

The District includes an annual inflation factor for future increa ses in assessments by a percentage equal to the increase in t he Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario California Standard Metropolita n Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Stat istics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less.

There is a 2.52% proposed inflationary increase in the assessment per acre or per parcel as applicable over the assessment levied for Fiscal Year 2024-25, which is consistent with the ballot proposition approved by the qualified electors when establishing said District.

Packet Page. 731

2. Cost Estimates Page | 3
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Table 2-1
MAD No. 1022 Zone 1 FY 2025-26 Budget
Estimated through June 30
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Total EDU's 297.28
Common Area Maintenance $33,954.85 $34,633.95
Percent of Zone 1 Common Area Maintenance -10.00% -10.00% Prorated Zone 1 Amount ($3,349.80) ($3,422.20)
Percent of Timber Creek 63.00% 63.00%
Prorated Timber Creek Amount $1,781.04 $1,816.66
Total Direct Costs $32,386.09 $33,028.41
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $2,599.36 $2,757.66
City Administration $2,187.47 $2,187.47
Auditor-Controller $4.50 $4.50
Total Indirect Costs $4,791.33 $4,949.63
Total Costs $37,177.42 $37,978.05

Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $2,455.06 $2,634.43
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($5,248.17) ($5,361.60)
Total Adjustments ($2,793.11) ($2,727.17)
Total Assessment $34,384.31 $35,250.88
Packet Page. 732

2. Cost Estimates Page | 4
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Table 2-2
MAD No. 1022 Zone 2 FY 2025-26 Budget
Estimated through June 30
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Total EDU's 153.59
Common Area Maintenance $14,900.34 $15,198.35
Percent of Zone 1 Common Area Maintenance 5.00% 5.00%
Prorated Zone 1 Amount $1,435.33 $1,463.62
Percent of Timber Creek 37.42% 37.42%
Prorated Timber Creek Amount $1,057.79 $1,078.95
Total Direct Costs $17,393.47 $17,740.92
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $1,499.41 $1,590.73
City Administration $1,773.76 $1,773.76
Auditor-Controller $2.40 $2.40
Total Indirect Costs $3,275.57 $3,366.89
Total Costs $20,669.04 $21,107.80

Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $1,517.03 $1,628.28
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($2,287.03) ($2,335.58)
Total Adjustments ($770.00) ($707.30)
Total Assessment $19,899.04 $20,400.51
Packet Page. 733

2. Cost Estimates Page | 5
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Table 2-3
MAD No. 1022 Zone 3 FY 2025-26 Budget
Estimated through June 30
Direct Costs FY 2024-25 FY 2025-26
Total EDU's 100.20
Common Area Maintenance $7,699.58 $7,853.58
Percent of Zone 1 Common Area Maintenance 5.00% 5.00%
Prorated Zone 1 Amount $1,435.33 $1,463.62
Total Direct Costs $9,134.92 $9,317.19
Indirect Costs
Assessment Engineer $790.31 $838.43
City Administration $896.88 $896.88
Auditor-Controller $4.50 $4.50
Total Indirect Costs $1,691.68 $1,739.81
Total Costs $10,826.60 $11,057.00

Collection/(Contribution)
Operating Reserve $602.92 $656.75
Capital Replacement $0.00 $0.00
City Contribution $0.00 $0.00
General Benefit Contribution ($951.34) ($971.81)
Total Adjustments ($348.41) ($315.06)
Total Assessment $10,478.18 $10,741.94
Packet Page. 734

3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 6
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Changes in Organization
There are no changes in organization for Fiscal Year 2025-26.

Proposition 218 Compliance
On November 5, 1996 Cali fornia voters approved Pr oposition 218 entitled “Right to Vote on Taxes Act” which added Article XIII D to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for the formation and administration of assessment districts. Proposition 218 also requires that with certain specified exceptions, which are des cribed below, all existing assessment districts must be ratified by the property owners within the District using the new procedures.

Some of these exceptions include:

1. Any assessment imposed exclusively to finance the capital cost or maintenance and operation expenses for streets.

2. Any assessments levied pursuant to a petition signed by the persons owning all of the parcels subject to the assessment at the time the assessment was initially imposed.

However, even if assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, if the assessments are increased in the future, the Cit y will need to comply with the provisions of Proposition 218 for that portion of the increased assessment formula (e.g., CPI increase) .

Proposition 218 does not define this term “streets”, however, based on the opinions of the public agency officials, attorneys, assessment engineers, and Senate Bill 919, it has been determined that str eets include all public improvements located within the street r ight-of- way. This would include median and parkway landscaping, traffic signals, safety lighting, and street lighting.

Proposition 218 defines “assessment” as “any levy or charge upon real property by an agency for a special benefit conferred upon the real property”, California Constitution, Article XIII D, §2(b). A special assessment, sometimes called a “benefit assessment,” is a charge generally levied upon parcels of real property to pay for benefits the parcels receive from local improvements. Special assessments are levied according to statutory authority granted by the Legislature or, in some instances, local charters. Distinguishing among taxes, fees and assessments can be difficult and often depends on the context in which the distinction is made. For example, taxes, assessm ents and property-related fees all may be imposed on property. The key feature that distinguishes an assessment from a tax, fee, or charge is the existence of a special benefit to real property. Without identifying a special benefit, there can be no assessment.

Distinguishing General and Special Benefit
Proposition 218 added a set of procedures and requirements which a local government must follow to levy an assessment. In addit ion to notice, hearing, and assessment ballot proceedings, Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and requires a local government to “separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on a parcel.” By its nature most every public improvement financed through an assessment district contains an element of public benefit. The test is:
does there exist, with relation to the improvement, a special benefit to the property assessed? The law requires that portion o f the cost of the improvement which benefits the public generally, to be separated from that portion of the cost of the improvement which specially benefits assessed properties. Proposition 218 provides the following definition of “special benefit”:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or to the public at large. General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit”.

The actual assessment and the amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized roll at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the records of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.

Packet Page. 735

3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 7
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Direct and Special Benefit
The maintenance of landscaping, groundcover, shrubs, trees, irrigation and detention basin provides direct and special benefit to those properties located within MAD No. 1022.

Each and every lot or parcel within the District, receives a particular and distinct benefit from the improvements over and above general benefits conferred by the improvements. First, improvements were conditions of approval for the creation or development of the parcels.

In order to create or develop the parcels, the City required the original developer to install and/or guarantee the maintenance of the improvements, and appurtenant facilities serving the lots or parcels. Therefore, each and every lot or parcel within the District could not have been developed in the absence of the installation and expected maintenance of these facilities.

In addition, the improvements continue to confer a particular and distinct special benefit upon parcels within the District because of the nature of the improvements. The proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement, and appurtenant facilities specially benefit parcels within the Dis trict by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenati on, attenuating noise from adjacent streets and controlling dust for those properti es in close proximity to the landscaping. Improved erosion and wate r quality control, dust abatement, increased public safety (e.g., control sight distance restrictions and fire hazards), improved neighborho od property protection and aesthetics, controlling or restric ting the flow of traffic into and out of the development, increasing public safety for both pedestrians and the motoring public, and inc reasing traffic safety by improving visibility. The spraying and treating of landscaping for disease reduces the likelihood of insect infestation and other diseases spreading to landscaping located throughout the properties within the District. Streetlights also provide safety for pedestrians and motorists living and owning property in the District during the nighttime hours, and to assign rights-of-way for the safety of pedestrians and motorists by defining a specific path during all hours of the day.

Streets are constructed for the safe and convenient travel of vehicles and pedestrians. They also provide an area for underground and overhead utilities. These elements are a distinct and special benefit to all developed parcels in the District. Streetlights ar e installed on and are for street purposes and are maintained and serviced to allow the street to perform to the standards it was designed.

Streetlights are determined to be an integral part of “streets” as a “permanent public improvement.” One of the principal purpo ses of fixed roadway lighting is to create a nighttime environment conducive to quick, accurate, and comfortable seeing for the user o f the facility. These factors, if attained, combine to improve traffic safety and achieve efficient traffic movement. Fixed lighting can enable the motorist to see detail more distinctly and to react safely toward roadway and traffic conditions present on or near the roadway facility.

The system of streets within the District is established to provide access to each parcel in the District. Streetlights provide a safer street environment for owners of the parcels served. If the parcels were not subdivided to provide individual parcels to owners within the District, there would be no need for a system of streets with streetlights. Therefore, the installation of streetlights is for the express, special benefit of the parcels within the District.

The proper maintenance of the landscaping, ornamental st ructures, and appurtenant facilities reduces property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through the screening of properties within the District from arterial streets.

Finally, the proper maintenance of landscaping, multi-purpose tr ails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, and graffiti abateme nt, and appurtenant structures improves the attractiveness of the properties within the District. This provides a positive visual experience each and every time a trip is made to or from the property and provides an enhanced quality of life and sense of well-being for prop erties within the District.

Because all benefiting properties consist of a uniform land use, it is determined that all lots or parcels benefit equally from the improvements and the costs and expenses for the provision of elec tricity for the streetlights and traffic signals and the maint enance of landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio- swales, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatem ent are apportioned on a per acre, per EDU (Equivalent Dwelling Unit), or per parcel basis.

Packet Page. 736

3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 8
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Based on the benefits described above, landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-swales, streetlights, tr affic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement are an integral part of the quality of life of the District. This quality of life is a special benefit to those parcels that are not government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels. Government owned easements, utility easements, and flood channel parcels do not benefit from the improvements due to their use and lack of habitation on su ch parcels. Parcels of this nature are usually vacant narrow strips of land or flood control channels and therefore do not generat e or experience pedestrian or vehicular traffic. Nor do these types of parcels support dwelling units or other structures that would promote frequent use of the parcels by the traveling public. As a result of this lack of activity on such parcels they do not receive any benefit from landscaping, multi-purpose trails, fencing, fossil filters, bio-sw ales, streetlights, traffic signals, and bridge lights, and graffiti abatement and are not assessed.

General Benefit
The Benefit received by the parcels within the boundaries of the District is determined to be of more than ordinary public bene fit, thus each parcel within the District being assessed receives special benefit from the improvements. If the property not within the boundaries of a District also receives some benefit from the improvements, consideration must then be given to a general benefit given by the improvements, which may not be assessed to the parcels within the District. Since the installation and maintenance of the landscaping and establishment of an assessment district for the maintenance of the landscaping is specific and incidental to this developme nt, it is further determined that the improvements to be maintained by the assessment district are of special benefit to the District only and are 100% assessable to the parcels within the boundaries of the assessment district, except as follows:

1. Areas of maintenance that front on major arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 15% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District.

2. Areas of maintenance that front on secondary arterial streets , as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 10% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District.

3. Areas of maintenance that front on collector streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the City’s General Plan, are determined to be 5% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are not assessable to the District.

4. Areas that front on local streets are determined to be 100% special benefit and are 100% assessable to the District.

These percentages are based on the traffic circulation for the various street classifications.

Tippecanoe Avenue, Third Street, and Del Rosa Drive between Harry Sheppard Boulevard and Third Street are classified as major arterial streets. Lena Road, Mill Street, and Harry Shepard Boulevard between Tippecanoe Avenue and Del Rosa Drive are classified as secondary arterial streets. Rialto Avenue, Mountain View Avenue, Leland Norton Way, Harry Sheppard Boulevard between Del Rosa Drive and Leland Norton Way are classified as collector streets.

Within Zone 1 the major arterial streets comprise 75.6%, the secondary arterial streets comprise 19.7%, and the collector streets comprise 4.7% of the total areas of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of 75.6% plus 10% of 19.7% plus 5% of 4.7% of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to Zone 1.

The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%, 10% and 15%). The result is the General Benefit of 13.55% needed for Zone 1.

Within Zone 2 the major arterial streets comprise 21.3%, the secondary arterial streets comprise 78.7%, and the collector streets comprise 0.0% of the total areas of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of 21.3% plus 10% of 78.7% of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to Zone 2.

The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%, 10% and 15%). The result is the General Benefit of 11.07% needed for Zone 2.

Within Zone 3 the major arterial streets comprise 35.9%, the secondary arterial streets comprise 30.8%, and the collector streets comprise 33.3% of the total areas of maintenance. Pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of 35.9% plus 10% of 30.8 % plus 5% of 33.3 of the total cost of maintenance will not be assessed to Zone 3.

Packet Page. 737

3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 9
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
The General Benefit is calculated by taking the area of General Benefit and dividing it by the total area to be maintained. The percentage of total area of General Benefit is multiplied by the total area maintenance costs. The total cost of a General Benefit area is then multiplied by the derived factor from above (5%, 10% and 15%). The result is the General Benefit of 10.13% needed for Zone 3.

Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, unless they receive no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments.

Method of Apportionment
The Assessment Law permits the establishment of assessment distri cts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and se rvicing of public lights, landscaping, dedicated easements for landscape use, and appurtenant facilities. The Assessment Law further provides that assessments may be apportioned upon all assessable lots or parcels of land within an assessment district in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each lot or parcel from the improvements rather than assessed value. “The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairl y distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.”
The formula used for calculating assessments reflects the compos ition of the parcels and the improvements and services provided by the District to fairly apportion the costs based on the estimated benefit to each parcel.

In addition, Article XIII D of the California Constitution (the “Article”) requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. The Article provides that only special benefits are assessable, and the City must separate the general benefits from the special benefit s conferred on a parcel. A special benefit is a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on the public at large, including real property within the District. The general enhancement of property value does not constitute a special benefit.

Landscaping and streetlighting and its proper maintenance enhance s the esthetics of any given area. The benefit received by the owners of properties in the area varies depending on which zone the property is lo cated. The Assessment District is divided int o three zones. The San Bernardino International Airport provided special benefit to all three zones. Thus all three zones shall share a portion of the maintenance cost for improvements located on such Airport properties. Timber Creek provides a special benefit to Zone 1 and 2 but provides no benefit to Zone 3. The maintenance cost for Timber Creek shall be shared proportionately by area between Zone 1 and Zone 2 whereas Zone 3 shall not participate in any of the maintenance costs for Timber Creek.

Part I – Applicable to All Properties within the Assessment District:

Apportionment of assessments across the individual parcels is based on the area of each parcel in relation to the total area within each respective zone or combination of zones as follows:

Where: Area “I” is the area of any of the individual parcels shown as an assessment number.

Area 1 is the summation of the areas of the participating parcels within Zone 1.

Area 2 is the summation of the areas of the participating parcels within Zone 2.

Area 3 is the summation of the areas of the participating parcels within Zone 3.

Zone 1 Owners: 0.9 (net cost Zone 1) * (Area “I” / Area 1) + (total cost Timber Creek) * {Area “I” / (Area 1 + Area 2)} Zone 2 Owners: 0.05 (net cost Zone) * (Area “I” / (Area 2) + (net cost Zone 2) * (Area “I”/Area 2) + (total cost Timber Creek) * {Area “I” / (Area 1 + Area 2)}
Zone 3 Owners: 0.05 (net cost Zone 1) * (Area “I”/Area 3) + (total cost Zone 3) + (Area “I” / Area 3) Part II – Applicable to Properties without a Default Assessment Agreement:

Within each Zone of the Assessment District the City shall unde rtake a separate accounting and calculation to be maintained as to those properties which then have a Default Assessment Agreement in effect. On a Zone by Zone basis within the Assessment District, the dollar amount of the City incurred costs for the maintenanc e of adjacent landscaping, exclusive of common area landscaping at intersections and median strips and other monument sign areas, shall be calculated and spread on an acreage basis against all Packet Page. 738

3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 10
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
properties within each Zone that do not have then have a Default Assessment Agreement in effect. Such amount as calculated pursuant to this Part II shall then be added to the amount calculated for all properties pursuant to Part I above placed on the tax bill only for those properties that do not have a Default Assessment Agreement then in effect. Only properties having either a minimum street frontage of 400 feet or a minimum area of 2.25 acres are eligible to petition the City for a Default Assessment Agreement. The Part II form ula is below for Zone 1, Zone 2 and Zone 3 Owners:
(Cost of Adjacent Landscaping by Zone) / Acreage of Maintenance Areas properties without Default Assessment Agreement = Part II assessment amount per Acre of Maintenance Areas
Benefit by Zone
Each of the assessable parcels within the District has been deemed to receive proportional special benefit from the maintenance and operation of the improvements. The percentage change in allowable Fiscal Year 2025-26 assessment from the allowable Fiscal Year 2024-25 assessment is as follows:

Table 3-1
Maximum Assessment Rates
Zone
Estimated
Cost
FY 25-26
Max Assessment FY 24-25 Max Assessment FY 25-26 Allowable Assessment
Rate Change
Actual Assessment FY 25-26
Common
Area/Acre
Adjacent
Area/Sq. Ft.

Common
Area/Acre
Adjacent
Area/Sq. Ft.

Common
Area/Acre
Adjacent
Area/Sq. Ft.
1 $37,983.53 $211.76 $4.38 $217.10 $4.38 2.52% $118.83 $0.00 2 $21,107.80 $129.56 $0.38 $132.83 $0.38 2.52% $132.83 $0.00 3 $11,057.00 $124.02 $0.38 $127.14 $0.38 2.52% $107.31 $0.00

Due to the nature of landscape maintenance, it is anticipated that there will be future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual increases may be increased without further notice or public hearin g by a percentage equal to the increase in the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the Riverside-San Bernardino - Ontario California Standard Metropolitan Statistical area, as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%, whichever is less. The CPI-U is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no event will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the District.

Whereas,
the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the Assessment Law, adopted Resolution No. 2006-91 to initiate proceedings to form a special assessment district known and designated as:

Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022; and,

Whereas, the City Council, did direct the appointed engineer to prepare and file an annual report, in accordance with the Assessment Law.

Whereas, Section 22567 of said Article 4 states the Report shall consist of the following; a. Maintenance plans for the improvements
b. An estimate of the costs of the improvements
c. A diagram for the assessment district
d. An assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance of the improvements

Packet Page. 739

3. Method of Apportionment of Assessment Page | 11
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26

Now, Therefore, I, the appointed ENGINEER, acting on behalf of the City of San Bernardino, pursuant to the Assessment Law, do hereby submit the following:

1. Pursuant to the provisions of law the costs and expenses of the District have been assessed upon the parcels of land in the District benefited thereby in direct proportion and relation to t he estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For particulars as to the identification of said parcel, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a reduced copy of which is included herein.

2. As required by law, a Diagram is filed herewith, showing the District, as well as the boundaries and dimensions of the respe ctive parcels and subdivisions of land within said District as the same exist each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots, respectively, have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in the Assessment Roll contained herein.

3. The separate numbers given the subdivisions and parcels of land, as shown on said Assessment Diagram and Assessment Roll, correspond with the numbers assigned to each parcel by the San Bernardino County Assessor. Reference is made to the County Assessment Roll for a description of the lots or parcels.

4. There are no parcels or lots within MAD No. 1022 that are owned by a federal, state or other local governmental agency that will benefit from the services to be provided by the assessments to be collected.

The City requested Spicer Consulting Group, LLC., to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report for Maintenance Assessment District No. 1022 pursuant to the Assessment Law presenting plans and specificat ions describing the general nature, location and extent of t he improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for MAD No. 1022 for the referenced Fiscal Year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties to be assessed, and an assessme nt of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and-or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received.

Packet Page. 740

4. Engineer’s Signature Page | 12
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
Executed this day of July 2025.

FRANCISCO MARTINEZ JR
PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 84640

ENGINEER OF WORK

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the _______ day of ____________, 2025. By Adoption of Resolution No. _______ by the City Council.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer’s Report, together with the Assessment Roll and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of t he City of San Bernardino, California, on the _____day of ___________, 2025.

CITY CLERK

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Packet Page. 741

5. Assessment Diagram Page | 13
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is filed herewith, are incorporated by reference in Appendix B herein, and made part of this Report.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor-Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the cu rrent fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel number will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. T he assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionmen t and assessment rate approved in this Report. Therefore, if a si ngle parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Information identified on these maps was received from several sources including the owner/developer, City of San Bernardino, a nd the San Bernardino County Assessor’s Office.

Packet Page. 742

6. Assessment Rolls Page | 14
City of San Bernardino
Engineer’s Report MAD’s
Fiscal Year 2025-26
The actual amount of the assessment for the Fiscal Year 2025-26 apportioned to each parcel as shown on the latest equalized rol l at the County Assessor’s office are listed in Appendix A of this Report. The description of each lot or parcel is part of the rec ords of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino and such records are, by reference, made part of this Report.

Packet Page. 743

Appendix A:

Assessment Rolls
Packet Page. 744
CC30 SP04 - AD 1022 Zone 1
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0136-341-11 $166.48 0136-341-13 $731.80 0136-341-21 $257.62 0136-341-42 $2,425.40 0136-341-43 $1,030.74 0136-341-50 $387.62 0136-341-65 $6,897.60 0136-341-68 $189.72 0136-341-72 $18,251.32 0136-341-82 $947.30 0136-341-89 $3,129.78 0136-341-90 $309.58 0136-341-91 $9.64 0136-341-92 $246.10 0136-541-01 $270.04 Totals Parcels 15 Levy $35,250.74
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 745
CC30 SP05 - AD 1022 Zone 2
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0136-341-84 $6,583.20 0136-341-85 $1,357.50 0136-341-86 $1,197.28 0136-341-87 $3,125.20 0136-341-88 $7,444.44 0136-391-10 $331.22 0136-391-29 $183.08 0136-391-30 $178.54
Totals Parcels 8 Levy $20,400.46
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 746
CC30 SP08 - AD 1022 Zone 3
Fiscal Year 2025-26
APN Levy APN Levy APN Levy
0136-351-01 $2,146.26 0136-351-12 $2,175.24 0136-351-16 $2,070.06 0136-351-17 $658.90 0136-351-18 $521.54 0136-351-19 $1,078.50 0280-091-27 $715.06 0280-091-28 $302.94 0280-091-29 $18.48 0280-091-66 $388.46 0280-091-67 $64.38 0280-091-68 $53.64 0280-091-69 $75.10 0280-091-70 $191.00 0280-091-71 $282.22 Totals Parcels 15 Levy $10,741.78
Assessment Roll

Engineer's Report
Packet Page. 747
Appendix B:

Assessment Diagram
Packet Page. 748
LENA
RD
3 RD ST

CENTRAL AVE
COUNTY
RD

RIALTO AVE
DEL
ROSA
DR

MILL ST

TIPPECANOE AVE
0 600 1,200300 Feet
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1022
Landscaping 117,407 sq. ft. Adjacent 182,146 sq. ft. Timber Creek Zone 1
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
Ê
Packet Page. 749

Packet Page. 750

CONSENT CALENDAR
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 21, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Bill Gallardo, Interim City Manager; C. Jeannie Fortune, Interim Director of Finance and Management Services
Department: Finance & Management Services
Subject: Review of Administrative Budget Transfers From January 1, 2025 Through March 31, 2025 (All Wards)

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, review and file all listed administrative budget transfers from January 1, 2025, through March 31, 2025.

Executive Summary
Finance & Management Services requests the Mayor and City Council to review and file department to department administrative budget transfers made from January 1, 2025, through March 31, 2025.

Background
On May 4, 2022, the Mayor and City Council adopted Ordinance No. MC-1568 which amended Section 3.05.010 in the Municipal Code regarding budget transfers.

Specifically, the amendment to the ordinance nullified the not-to-exceed amount of $25,000 per budget transfer; authorized the Director of Finance & Management Services to approve budget transfers within a department’s personnel budget into their operating budget; authorized the Director of Finance & Management Services to approve department to department budget transfers; established that budget transfers will not increase or decrease a department’s approved budget, nor will it increase or decrease the approved fund budget without council approval; and stated that any cumulative amount of more than $5,000 transferred between departments in a 12- month period must be reported to the Mayor and City Council during the regular Quarterly Report.

Discussion
Budget transfers are requests received by Finance & Management Services from departments to move funds from one account to another after the adoption of the Packet Page. 751
original budget. Transfers occur when a department needs to correct its originally adopted budget or move funds to accommodate a change in the department’s planned expenditures. When processing budget transfers, Finance & Management Services verifies that the transfer properly allocates resources based on the strategic objectives and goals set forth by the Mayor and City Council and reflects the priorities of the community.

The table below provides the list of the administrative transfers that have been processed.

Date of
Transfer From To Amount
1/22/2025 Community Development &
Housing
Economic
Development $350,464.95
2/27/2025 Economic Development City Manager’s
Office $151,130.65
As part of the departmental restructuring, responsibilities previously held by Community Development & Housing have been transferred to Economic Development.

Consequently, a total of $350,464.95 has been reallocated within the general fund to support operational needs now managed by the Economic Development Department.

This includes funding for the security contract at the Regal Theater, which was formerly administered by Community Development & Housing. In addition, a portion of the reallocated funds has been directed toward engineering, land development design, appraisal and title services, and other related expenses in support of projects aligned with the City’s Strategic Initiatives.

The transfer of $151,130.65 within the general fund from Economic Development back to the City Manager’s Office reallocates the budget for the Senior Management Analyst position. This adjustment follows an earlier decision by the City Manager to place the position under Economic Development. Upon further evaluation, the position was returned to the City Manager’s Office to better align responsibilities with the department’s strategic direction. This reallocation reflects the City Manager’s intent to optimize organizational resources and strengthen the department’s capacity to effectively support citywide initiatives.
2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
Authorization of this file and receive item aligns with three of the adopted 2021-2025 Key Strategic Targets and Goals. Finance & Management Services reporting on departmental administrative budget transfers completed within the quarter that meet the requirements of the Mayor and City Council helps Improved Operational & Financial Capacity by effectively creating a framework for spending decisions.

Administering budget transfers meets the Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community goal by developing and implementing a community engagement plan where the community and staff actively adapt to ensure needs of the community are fulfilled. Improved Quality of Life is met by ensuring that service levels are funded Packet Page. 752
proactively to integrate customer-service orientation and metrics into all City operations.

Fiscal Impact
There is no General Fund impact to the City.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, review and file all listed administrative budget transfers from January 1, 2025 through March 31, 2025.

Attachments
Ordinance MC-1568
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

On February 19, 2025, Mayor and City Council received and filed a quarterly administrative budget transfer report from October 1,
2024 through December 31, 2024.

On November 6, 2024, Mayor and City Council received and filed two separate quarterly administrative budget transfer reports from
April 1, 2024 through June 30, 2024 and July 1, 2024
through September 30, 2024.

On August 7, 2024, Mayor and City Council received and filed a quarterly administrative budget transfer report from Jan 1, 2024
through March 31, 2024.

On March 6, 2024, Mayor and City Council received and filed a quarterly administrative budget transfer report from July 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.

On July 19, 2023, Mayor and City Council received and filed a quarterly administrative budget transfer report from April 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023.

On January 18, 2023, Mayor and City Council received and filed a quarterly administrative budget transfer report from July 1, 2022 through December 15, 2022.

On August 17, 2022, Mayor and City Council received and filed a quarterly administrative budget transfer report from April 5, 2022 through June 30, 2022.

Packet Page. 753
On May 4, 2022 Mayor and City Council adopted Ordinance No. MC- 1568, amending section 3.05 on the Municipal Code.

On December 1, 2021 Mayor and City Council heard the FY 2021/22 1st Quarter Report; Adopted Resolution No. 2021-289
amending the City of San Bernardino’s FY 2021/22
Operating Budget; and introduced, read by title only,
and waived further reading of Ordinance No. MC-1568,
amending section 3.05 of the Municipal Code
pertaining to budget transfers.

Packet Page. 754
Packet Page. 755
Packet Page. 756
Packet Page. 757
Packet Page. 758
Packet Page. 759
2 6
9 7

CONSENT CALENDAR
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 21, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Bill Gallardo, Interim City Manager;
C. Jeannie Fortune, Interim Director of Finance and Management Services
Department: Finance & Management Services
Subject: American Rescue Plan Update (All Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, receive and file a report on the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds allocation and expenditures to date.

Executive Summary
The City of San Bernardino was awarded $77,656,407 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. The City received 2 tranches, half of the funds in May 2021, and the remainder of the funds in May of 2022. This staff report is to provide an update on the projects obligated by ARPA funds of $77.6m and expenditures reported as of March 31, 2025 totaling $30.9m.

Background
The U.S. Treasury required ARPA funds to be obligated by December 31, 2024 and fully expended by December 31, 2026. To date, Mayor and City Council have obligated the total $77,656,407 in ARPA funds prior to the obligation deadline. Projects funded by ARPA align with Treasury issued final rules for allowable investments within the Enumerated Use Categories as well as expenditures within the revenue loss (standard allowance) category.

Discussion
ARPA funded projects are in various stages to completion and staff intends to provide routine updates to the Mayor and City Council on the progress to fully expend these funds prior to the December 31, 2026, deadline. A few project highlights for the quarterly reporting period of January 1, 2025 – March 31, 2025 are:

Packet Page. 760
2 6
9 7
Feldheym Library Animakerspace/Cosand Computer Lab (Item #13, Attachment 1) Design work is nearing completion for the rehabilitation of the Cosand Computer Lab to accommodate the Feldheym Library Animakerspace. The Request for Proposals (RFP) for construction is scheduled for release in late April. Installation of the Garner Holt Animakerspace technologies will follow construction.

Seccombe Park Revitalization Project (Item #4, Attachment 1) The Public Works Department successfully issued a Purchase Order and Notice to Proceed to Landscape Support Services for construction services, and to CSG Consultants for Construction Management and Inspection Professional Services.

Lytle Creek Park – Futsal Field Project (Item #7, Attachment 1) The Public Works Department successfully issued a Notice to Proceed for the Lytle Creek Park Futsal Field Project. Construction is currently well underway.

Real-Time Information Center / Citywide Crime Camera Program (Item #12, Attachment 1)
The San Bernardino Police Department successfully issued Purchase Orders to VectorUSA, Axon Enterprise Inc., and Peregrine Technologies Inc. as part of a major effort to implement a Real-Time Information Center. This initiative supports the development of a citywide crime camera program aimed at improving response times to violent crime within the City.

Street Maintenance (Item #14, Attachment 1)
The Public Works Department issued Purchase Orders to Horizons Construction Co.

International Inc. and Hardy & Harper Inc., asphalt paving contractors, to begin street maintenance and resurfacing work funded through ARPA. The first segment completed under this initiative, located at West 30th Street, Arrowhead Avenue, and E Street, marks the beginning of several planned improvements throughout the City.

ARPA fund expenditures as of March 31, 2025 total $30.9m, approximately 40% of the total award of $77.6m. Additional details and listing by project are provided in Attachment 1.
2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
Investments in the community using the American Rescue Plan funds support Key Strategic Goal 2. Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community, b. Evaluate operations and performance, investment in resources, technology, and tools to continually improve organizational efficiency and effectiveness; and Goal 3. Improved Quality of Life.

Fiscal Impact
There is no General Fund impact associated with approval of this item.

Conclusion
Packet Page. 761
2 6
9 7
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, receive and file a report on the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds allocation and expenditures to date.

Attachments
Attachment 1 American Rescue Plan (ARPA) Allocation and Expenditure Update Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

January 18, 2025 Mayor and City Council received and filed an ARPA Allocation and Expenditure Update.

December 18, 2024 Mayor and City Council received an update on ARPA funding and approved the final allocation of $129,948 in additional ARPA funds to the Asphalt Maintenance and Street Segment Repair Project.

December 4, 2024 Mayor and City Council approved staff’s recommendation to reallocate $2,955,215 for the Asphalt Maintenance and Street Segment Repair Project and $2,650,000 towards the
purchase of Palm Field.

October 2, 2024 Mayor and City Council received an update on ARPA funding and projects and approved staff recommendations for
unallocated or project surplus and staff direction on
reallocation of funds. New Projects presented for approval were the Police Real Time Information Center in the amount of $2,497,500. Economic Development Software Program in the amount of $ 129,948, and the Library Animaker Space in the amount of $1,797,174.

September 18, 2024 Mayor and City Council received an update on ARPA funding and projects and provided staff direction on any unassigned ARPA funds.

June 5, 2024 Mayor and City Council approved $863,851 in ARPA funds for the Guadalupe Field at Sal Saavedra Park Revitalization Project.

April 17, 2024 Mayor and City Council approved $655,000 in ARPA funds for the Encanto Community Center.

September 6, 2023 Mayor and City Council approved $5,145,000 in ARPA funds for “Hero Pay” to city and water department employees.

Packet Page. 762
2 6
9 7
August 16, 2023 Mayor and City Council approved $500,000 in ARPA funds related to various nuisance and property abatement costs.

July 19, 2023 Mayor and City Council received and filed an update on ARPA funds and adopted Resolution No. 2023-107 assigning
$10,000,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funds for the
replacement of the City’s Enterprise Resource Planning
System and amending the FY 2022/23-2024/24 Biennial
Budget by $10,000,000.

May 17, 2023 Mayor and City Council reallocated unspent funding from the ASU Temporary Housing and the full allocation from the San Bernardino Valley College for a total of $973,500 for interim housing during development of the SB Hope Campus.

December 7, 2022 Mayor and City Council Adopted Resolution No. 2022- 26 Amending the FY 2021/22 Operating and Capital Budget
allocating $24,650,000 in ARPA funds.

February 2, 2022 Mayor and City Council Adopted Resolution No. 2022- 26 Amending the FY 2021/22 Operating and Capital Budget
allocating $24,050,000 in ARPA funds
October 20, 2021 Mayor and City Council Adopted Resolution No. 2021- 247 Amending the FY 2021/22 Operating and Capital Budget
allocating $8,160,000 in ARPA funds.

August 4, 2021 Mayor and City Council received a report and discussed the categories for spending the City’s American Rescue Plan Allocation.

March 17, 2021 Mayor and City Council received a presentation on the American Rescue Plan from Congressman Pete Aguilar.

Packet Page. 763
Department Project Title Allocated Obligated via
Contractor/
Subrecipient
Obligated via
Interagency
Agreement
Expenditures
as of
12/27/2024
Allocated Obligated via
Contractor/
Subrecipient
Obligated via
Interagency
Agreement
Expenditures
as of
03/31/2025
Economic Development 1 Small Business Non-Profit Assistance 3,126,300 3,126,300 - 3,126,300 3,126,300 3,126,300 - 3,126,300 Economic Development 2 Entrepreneur Resource Center (Aspen Institute Initiative)
1,873,700 1,873,700 - 1,873,700 1,873,700 1,873,700 - 1,873,700 Economic Development 3 Façade Improvements (Paintbrush Program) 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - Parks & Recreation 4 Seccombe Park Renovations 12,792,332 12,769,611 22,721 171,278 12,792,332 12,769,611 22,721 172,944 Parks & Recreation 5 Nicholson Park 7,080,602 7,080,602 - 1,302,135 7,080,602 7,080,602 - 3,410,277 Parks & Recreation 6 Roosevelt Bowl Renovation 600,000 433,752 166,248 80,833 600,000 433,752 166,248 228,145 Parks & Recreation 7 Lytle Creek Soccer Fields 600,000 600,000 - 7,502 600,000 600,000 - 215,697 Parks & Recreation 8 Guadalupe Fields 863,851 863,851 - - 863,851 863,851 - 781,390 Parks & Recreation 9 Encanto Community Center - - - - - - - - City Services 10 Graffiti Abatement 1,000,000 737,129 262,871 335,966 1,000,000 737,129 262,871 353,224 City Services 11 Violence Intervention Program 750,000 645,031 104,969 511,588 750,000 645,031 104,969 515,153 City Services 12 Police Real Time Information System 2,497,500 2,497,500 - - 2,497,500 2,497,500 - 476,800 City Services 13 Library Animakerspace 1,797,174 1,091,409 705,765 - 1,797,174 1,091,409 705,765 545,736 Public Works Infrastructure 14 Street Improvements 3,335,163 3,335,163 - - 3,335,163 3,335,163 - - Water Infrastructure 15 Water Infrastructure Lead Connectors 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 Homelessness Initiatives 16 Lutheran Social Services Community Wellness Center Homekey Project
5,000,000 5,000,000 - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - -
Homelessness Initiatives 17 Motel Voucher Program 973,500 973,500 - - 973,500 973,500 - 2,713 Homelessness Initiatives 18 Navigation Center Construction 11,344,785 11,344,785 - 160,610 11,344,785 11,344,785 - 1,000,709 Homelessness Initiatives 19 Navigation Center Operations - - - - - - - - Homelessness Initiatives 20 Homelessness Outreach Team 1,500,000 820,000 680,000 620,888 1,500,000 820,000 680,000 620,888 Homelessness Initiatives 21 Mobile Showers & Laundry 150,000 150,000 - 99,651 150,000 150,000 - 99,651 Homelessness Initiatives 22 Temporary Housing for ASU Residents 76,500 76,500 - 76,500 76,500 76,500 - 76,500 Homelessness Initiatives 23 Emergency Nuisance & Building Health & Safety Abatement
500,000 500,000 - 400,024 500,000 500,000 - 437,616
Homelessness Initiatives 24 Purchase of Property (Palm Field) for Homeless Initiatives
2,650,000 - 2,650,000 2,650,000 - 2,650,000
IT Infrastructure 25 Enterprise Resource Planning System ($10m Standard Allowance)
6,670,052 6,181,397 488,655 5,813,702 6,670,052 6,181,397 488,655 6,401,294 IT Infrastructure 26 Land Management System ($10m Standard Allowance)
3,200,000 3,200,000 - 2,383,517 3,200,000 3,200,000 - 2,383,517 Economic Development 27 Economic Development Software Program ($10m Standard Allowance)
129,948 129,948 - - 129,948 129,948 - 64,621
Staff Salaries 28 Hero Pay 5,145,000 5,145,000 - 5,145,000 5,145,000 5,145,000 - 5,145,000 GRAND TOTAL 77,656,407 71,575,177 6,081,230 25,109,194 77,656,407 71,575,177 6,081,230 30,931,874 Revised Obligations
Reported to Treasury (Oct - Dec 2024)
Revised Obligations
Reported to Treasury (Jan - Mar 2025)
American Rescue Plan Act Fund Status
Revised: 5/7/25
Packet Page. 764

CONSENT CALENDAR
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 21, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Bill Gallardo, Interim City Manager;
Ernesto Salinas, Interim Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
Department: Parks & Recreation & Community Services
Subject: Acceptance and Approval of an Amendment for
Additional Funds to Older Californians Nutrition Program Grant Award FY 2024/25 in the amount of $33,494 (All
Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution No. 2025-295:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to approve a 2024/2025 Budget Amendment for the Older Californians Nutrition Program grant through the Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG); and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to accept the amended 2024/2025 Congregate Meal Program Grant Budget in the amount of an additional $33,494 (Total Award of $426,035); and

3. Authorizing the City Manager or their designee to conduct all negotiations, signing and submittals of necessary documents to receive grant budget awards; and

4. Approving certain related change orders to purchase orders to Sysco Foods (Total $225,600) and Hollandia Dairy (Total $26,500) for continued operation of the Older Californians Nutrition Program; and

5. Authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the grant funds for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025.

Packet Page. 765
Executive Summary
An amendment for additional grant funds for the Older Californians Nutrition Program has been awarded in the amount of $33,494 (Total $426,035). Funds are administered by the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian and will enable the city to meet the nutritional, wellness, and social needs of older adults.

Background
The City of San Bernardino offers a comprehensive Senior Nutrition Program designed to support the well-being of seniors in the community who are 60 years of age and older. This program provides nutritious, well-balanced meals, including both lunch and dinner, to help meet the dietary needs of seniors. Meals are available Monday through Friday, ensuring that participants have access to healthy food options throughout the entire workweek. The program operates year-round, offering continuous support to seniors regardless of the season. Through this initiative, the City aims to improve the quality of life for seniors by promoting better nutrition and overall health.

During FY 2023/24, the Older Californian Nutrition Program served 65,399 meals for a daily average of 266 individual clients, at six (6) nutrition sites: 5th Street Senior Center, Perris Hill Senior Center, Hernandez Community Center, Lytle Creek Community Center, New Hope Family Life Center, and Highland Senior Center. The City is on target to exceed that number in the current fiscal year. These meals were served both in in-person/dine-in and grab-n-go style. The food is prepared in the main kitchen at the 5th Street Senior Center and delivered to the five other sites in hot and cold containers.

Discussion
The Older Californian Nutrition Program, formerly known as the Senior Nutrition Program, is funded by the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG). The funding is provided through County Contract No. 22-666. On January 6, 2025, DAAS-PG announced an increase of $33,494 to the existing grant of $392,541, bringing the total to $426,035 for FY2024-

25. This funding will help provide nutrition services for older Californians, with a goal of serving at least 52,300 meals annually at six nutrition sites.

The additional funds will be used to purchase food, consumables, and dairy products from Sysco Foods and Hollandia Dairy, Inc. The City projects serving 65,000 meals this fiscal year, with rising food costs due to inflation. Staff is preparing an estimated projection for food expenses, and any remaining funds will be allocated to personnel costs. The amendment also includes one-time funding from the Area Plan.

These proposed actions will allow the Older Californian Nutrition Program to continue to deliver without delay the proposed FY 2024/2025 nutritional services to the City’s senior population. FY2024/2025 is the third of the three one-year renewals. Staff recommend approval for the issuance of purchase orders as follows:

Packet Page. 766

Vendor Original
PO Amount Amendment Total
Sysco Foods $215,600.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 225,600.00 (Co. $96,142; City $129,458)
Hollandia Dairy $ 22,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 24,000.00 (Co. $24,000) 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
This proposal aligns with Goal No. 1: Improved Financial & Operational Capacity by securing a long-term revenue source and creating a framework for spending decisions, Goal No. 2: Focused, Aligned Leadership and Unified Community by developing and implementing a community engagement plan, and Goal No. 3: Improved Quality of Life by providing low-cost nutritious meals for the senior aged population.

Fiscal Impact
The amount of grant funding currently available to the City from the County for FY 2024/25 is $ 392,541. The County is offering a One-Time Only augmentation for a total Congregate/Home Delivered Meal Program Budget of $426,035, requiring an amendment to the FY 2024/25 adopted budget, per the FY 2024/25 Amended Grant Program Budget Detail Sheet (Project #: 0513 Sr. Nutrition Grant 2024-25). The action will also require change orders to annual purchase orders with Sysco Food and Hollandia Dairy, increasing the grant obligation and decreasing the City’s match contribution.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California adopt Resolution No. 2025-295:

1. Authorizing the City Manager to approve a 2024/2025 Budget Amendment for the Older Californians Nutrition Program grant through the Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG); and

2. Authorizing the City Manager to accept the amended 2024/2025 Congregate Meal Program Grant Budget in the amount of an additional $33,494 (Total Award of $426,035); and

3. Authorizing the City Manager or their designee to conduct all negotiations, signing and submittals of necessary documents to receive grant budget awards; and

4. Approving certain related change orders to purchase orders to Sysco Foods (Total $225,600) and Hollandia Dairy (Total $26,500) for continued operation of the Older Californians Nutrition Program; and
Packet Page. 767

5. Authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the grant funds for the period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025.

Attachments
Attachment 1 RESOLUTION No. 2025-295, 2024-2025 Older Californian Nutrition Program Grant, Amended Budget
Attachment 2 2022-25 OCNP Grant, Exhibit A – County Contract No. 22 666 Attachment 3 IIIC City of San Bernardino 2025 A1 Budget Executed Attachment 4 2024-25 OCNP Amended Grant Program Budget Detail Sheet Attachment 5 FY 2024-25 Annual Purchase Orders – Sysco Foods & Hollandia Dairy
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

September 4, 2024 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No2024- 195, authorizing the City Manager to approve a 2024/2025 Budget for year three of a three-year Older Californians Nutrition Program grant through the Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG), authorizing the City Manager to accept the 2024/2025 Congregate Meal Program Grant Budget in the amount of $392,541, authoring the City Manager or their designee to conduct all negotiations, signings and submittals of necessary documents to receive grant budget awards, and approving certain related purchases to Sysco Foods ($215,600) and Hollandia Dairy ($24,530 and Consulting Health and Nutrition Services for continued operation of the Older Californians Nutrition Program, and authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the grant funds for the period of July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.

October 4, 2023 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2023-150, accepted the Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG) grant award in the amount of $376,667, appropriated the grant funds, and approved certain related purchase orders for continued operation of the Older
Californians Nutrition Program for the period of July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024.

June 15, 2022 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-126, approving San Bernardino County Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Contract No. 22-666 for Elderly Nutrition Program Services in the amount of $1,220,000 for the contract period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025; ratifying the Grant Packet Page. 768
Budget submittal and accepting the Grant Award of $348,749; authorizing the Director of Finance or designee to amend the FY 2022/23 and FY2023/24 adopted budgets to reflect grant
revenue and expenditures accordingly; and approved certain related purchase orders for continued operation of the Senior Nutrition Program for the period of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023.

Packet Page. 769
Resolution No. 2025-295
Resolution 2025-295
May 21, 2025

7 0
1 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-295

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN

BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE A 2024/2025 BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE OLDER CALIFORNIANS NUTRITION

PROGRAM GRANT THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF AGING AND ADULT SERVICES – PUBLIC GUARDIAN (DAAS-PG); AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT THE AMENDED 2024/2025 CONGREGATE MEAL PROGRAM GRANT BUDGET IN THE AMOUNT OF AN ADDITIONAL $33,494 (TOTAL AWARD OF $426,035); AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR THEIR

DESIGNEE TO CONDUCT ALL NEGOTIATIONS, SIGNING AND SUBMITTALS OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS TO RECEIVE GRANT BUDGET AWARDS; APPROVING

CERTAIN RELATED CHANGE ORDERS TO PURCHASE ORDERS TO SYSCO FOODS (TOTAL $225,600) AND HOLLANDIA DAIRY (TOTAL $26,500) FOR

CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE OLDER CALIFORNIANS NUTRITION PROGRAM; AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND

MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO AMEND THE GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PERIOD OF JULY 1, 2024 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2025.

WHEREAS, on May 23, 2022, the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) issued a contract for approval by the City of San Bernardino to provide Elderly (Older Californians) Nutrition Program Services for the three (3) year grant cycle in the amount of $1,220,000 for the contract term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2025; and, WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino submitted an Amended budget request for One- time Only funding from the Area Plan for approval of FY 2025 Older Californians Nutrition Program Grant Budget to the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG) for the Older Californians Nutrition Meal Program; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2025, the County of San Bernardino Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG) issued an e-mail of an executed FY24/25 A1 (Amended) budget to the City of San Bernardino, approving an amended County of San Bernardino Nutrition Services Congregate/Home Delivered Meal Program Budget for FY2024-25 to provide Elderly (Older Californians) Nutrition Program Services; and, WHEREAS, annual purchase orders for raw foods, beverages, and consumables with Sysco Foods and Hollandia Dairy exist for FY 2024/25.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

Packet Page. 770
Resolution No. 2025-295
Resolution 2025-295
May 21, 2025

7 0
1 3
SECTION 2. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby authorize the City Manager or his Designee to approve a 2024/2025 Budget Amendment for the Older Californians Nutrition Program grant through the Department of Aging and Adult Services – Public Guardian (DAAS-PG) in the total amount of $426,035; and SECTION 3. The Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby authorize the Director of Finance & Management Services, or designee, to amend the existing budget appropriations amongst the Parks, Recreation and Community Services accounts to accurately reflect the grant budget and grant match budget consistent with the adopted staff report; and SECTION 4. The Mayor and City Council hereby authorize the Director of Finance and Management Services, or designee, to approve certain related change orders to annual purchase orders with Sysco Foods ($225,600) and Hollandia Dairy ($26,500) for continued operation of the Older Californians Nutrition Program for the Period of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025 to ensure the needs of the program are met for FY 2024/2025; and SECTION 5. The Mayor and City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21st day of May 2025.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telica Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 771
Resolution No. 2025-295
Resolution 2025-295
May 21, 2025

7 0
1 3

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telica Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-295, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 21 st day of May 2025 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______
FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______
ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______

WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this 22nd day of May 2025.

Telica Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Packet Page. 772

Packet Page. 773

Packet Page. 774

Packet Page. 775

Packet Page. 776

Packet Page. 777

Packet Page. 778

Packet Page. 779

Packet Page. 780

Packet Page. 781

Packet Page. 782

Packet Page. 783

Packet Page. 784

Packet Page. 785

Packet Page. 786

Packet Page. 787

Packet Page. 788

Packet Page. 789

Packet Page. 790

Packet Page. 791

Packet Page. 792

Packet Page. 793

Packet Page. 794

Packet Page. 795

Packet Page. 796

Packet Page. 797

Packet Page. 798

Packet Page. 799

Packet Page. 800

Packet Page. 801

Packet Page. 802

Packet Page. 803

Packet Page. 804

Packet Page. 805

Packet Page. 806

Packet Page. 807

Packet Page. 808

Packet Page. 809

Packet Page. 810

Packet Page. 811

Packet Page. 812

Packet Page. 813

Packet Page. 814

Packet Page. 815

Packet Page. 816

Packet Page. 817

Packet Page. 818

Packet Page. 819

Packet Page. 820

Packet Page. 821

Packet Page. 822

Packet Page. 823

Packet Page. 824

Packet Page. 825

Packet Page. 826

Packet Page. 827

Packet Page. 828

Packet Page. 829

Packet Page. 830

Packet Page. 831

Packet Page. 832

Packet Page. 833

Packet Page. 834

Packet Page. 835

Packet Page. 836

Packet Page. 837

Packet Page. 838

Packet Page. 839

Packet Page. 840

Packet Page. 841

Packet Page. 842

Packet Page. 843

Packet Page. 844

Packet Page. 845

Packet Page. 846

Packet Page. 847

Packet Page. 848

Packet Page. 849

Packet Page. 850

Packet Page. 851

Packet Page. 852

Packet Page. 853

Packet Page. 854

Packet Page. 855

Packet Page. 856

Packet Page. 857

Packet Page. 858

Packet Page. 859
Packet Page. 860
Packet Page. 861
Schedule
"H"CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT: Parks & Recreation
PROJECT #: 0513 2024-25 OCNP Grant Program Amended Budget Detail Sheet Account Number Description
FY2024-25
BUDGET

ESTIMATES MATCH TOTAL
Grant Name:
123-380-0513 001-380-0513
Salaries
5011 Salaries perm/fulltime 77,793 77,793
5013 Automobile allowance -
5014 Salaries temp/parttime 166,041 31,258 197,299
5015 Overtime -
Total: Salaries 243,834 31,258 275,092
Benefits
5026 PERS retirement 12,596 12,596
5027 Health and life insurance 9,060 9,060
5028 Unemployment insurance 8,660 8,660
5029 Medicare 3,588 3,588
5034 CalPERS Unfunded Liability - -
Total: Benefits 33,904 - 33,904
Total: Salaries & benefits 277,738 31,258 308,996
Maintenance and Operations
5111 Material and supplies -
5112 Small tools & equip (consumables) 19,000 19,000
5114 Raw foods 103,642 129,458 233,100
5122 Dues and subscriptions -
5131 Mileage -
5132 Meetings and conferences -
5133 Education and training -
5150 Utilities 64,784 64,784
5172 Equipment maintenance 1,000 1,000
5174 Printing charges -
5175 Postage -
5176 Copy machine charges -
5181 Other operating expense 7,600 7,600
5186 Civic and promotional -
5193 Grant match -
Total: Maintenance and Operations 131,242 194,242 325,484 Contract Services
5502 Professional/contractual services -
5505 Other professional services 17,055 1,645 18,700
Total: Contractual Services 17,055 1,645 18,700
Internal Service Charges
5601 Garage charges - -
5602 Workers compensation - -
5603 Liability -
5604 IT charges in-house -
5605 Telephone support -
5606 Electric -
5612 Fleet charges - fuel -
Total: Internal Service Charges - - -
Capital Outlay
5703 Communications equipment -
Total: Capital Outlay - - -
Credit/billables
5910 Credit - federal and state program funding -
Total: Credit/billables - - -
Total: Non-Personnel Expenses 148,297 195,887 344,184
Grant Total 426,035 227,145 653,180
NOTE: Match(001) Salaries/Temp. reflect value of volunteer labor and Utilities are shown for Match reporting purposes only to show true costs, NOT General Fund obligated. 5/7/2025
Packet Page. 862
Packet Page. 863
Packet Page. 864

CONSENT CALENDAR
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 21, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Bill Gallardo, Interim City Manager;
Darren Goodman, Chief of Police
Department: Police
Subject: Adopt Resolution No. 2025-296 Authorizing the
Acceptance, Obligation, and Expenditure of Allocated
Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) Funds in the
Amount of $678,501.23 (All Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-296:

1. Authorizing the acceptance of the full FY 2024/25 Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) funds in the amount of $678,501.23, authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2024/25 Operating Budget accordingly; and

2. Authorizing the Police Department to encumber and expend the allocated Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) funds for FY 2024/25.

Executive Summary
The Police Department requests obligation and expenditure of FY 2024/25 Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) funds to purchase police fleet vehicles, vehicle upfitting equipment and equipment for the Department‘s Real-Time Information Center (RTIC). The Department will follow all established purchasing procedures and return to the Council for approval as required.

Background
The Citizens Option for Public Safety (COPS) program (AB 3229) provides funding exclusively to support front-line law enforcement. The money must supplement existing services and be used in accordance with written request by the Chief of Police or Chief Administrator of the law enforcement agency that provides services for the City. The City originally anticipated $630,000 of COPS funding for fiscal year Packet Page. 865
24/25, as included in the adopted budget. The actual allocation for the fiscal year is $678,501.23. The funds must be expended or encumbered by June 30, 2025.

Discussion
After assessing operational needs, the Department believes investing the grant funds into the police fleet will provide the greatest benefit to front-line law enforcement services.

The majority of the funds will be utilized to purchase both marked and unmarked police vehicles. Having a fully functional fleet is critical for day-to-day call response.

As staffing numbers increase, so does the number of vehicles needed to be at the ready to respond to calls. The current police fleet consists of approximately 100 marked units. At any given time, however, approximately 25-35% may be unavailable for use due to regular maintenance or repair. The remaining number of cars are sufficient for daily use by patrol staff, but increasing the total number of available cars and/or replacing older vehicles would ensure adequate resources are available during large scale deployments or emergency situations. In addition, many unmarked vehicles used by department personnel for utility or non-emergency response are nearing the end of their duty cycles and may need to be replaced if their repair costs exceed the value of the vehicle.

The equipment necessary to upfit the vehicles will also be purchased with these grant funds. After vehicles are purchased from the dealer, they must be retrofitted by an approved vendor for official use. Marked patrol units require radios and computers be installed in addition to the light and siren package. Unmarked vehicles are upfitted with covert light and siren systems before being customized for their specific use.

These customizations may include but are not limited to hydraulic tailgates for lifting heavy loads, armor reinforced body panels, additional batteries, all-terrain tires, winches, specialty lighting equipment and toolboxes.

In addition to the fleet purchases and upfitting costs, a portion of the grant funds will also be allocated toward supporting the Department’s Real-Time Information Center (RTIC). The RTIC plays a critical role in assisting frontline officers by providing real- time data analysis, intelligence gathering, and situational awareness during critical incidents and daily operations. Enhancing this center will improve the Department’s ability to coordinate resources, monitor emerging threats, and deliver timely information to officers in the field, ultimately strengthening public safety and response capabilities.

The Department will follow the appropriate purchasing procedures. All items that require further authorization will be returned to the council for approval. 2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
The request to encumber the COPS funds aligns with Key Target No. 2b: Focused Aligned Leadership & Unified Community — by investing in resources, technology, and tools to continually improve operational efficiency and effectiveness, and 3c:

Packet Page. 866
Improved Quality of Life - enhance the quality of public safety services.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Revenues and expenditures will be amended in the FY 2024/25 Operating Budget by $48,501.23.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Resolution No. 2025-296:

1. Authorizing the acceptance of the full FY 2024/25 Citizens' Option for Public Safety (COPS) funds in the amount of $678,501.23, authorizing the Director of Finance and Management Services to amend the FY 2024/25 Operating Budget accordingly; and

2. Authorizing the Police Department to encumber and expend the allocated Citizens’ Option for Public Safety (COPS) funds for FY 2024/25.

Attachments
Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2025-296
Ward:

All Wards
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

June 26, 2024 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2024-142 approving the Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating Budget including projected COPS funds.

June 5, 2024 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2024-134 accepting and allocating COPS 23/24 funds.

June 21, 2023 Mayor and City Council adopted Resolution 2023-080 approving the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Operating Budget including projected COPS funds.

Packet Page. 867
Resolution No. 2025-296
Resolution No. 2025-296

May 21st, 2025
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-296

RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,

AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE FULL
FY2024/25 CITIZENS’ OPTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY
(COPS) FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $678,501.23,

AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND

MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO AMEND THE OPERATING

BUDGET ACCORDINGLY, AND AUTHORIZING THE

POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ENCUMBER AND EXPEND
THE ALLOCATED CITIZENS’ OPTION FOR PUBLIC
SAFETY (COPS) FUNDS FOR FY 2024/25.

WHEREAS, The COPS program provides funding exclusively to support front-line law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, The Police Department has identified specific needs that are valuable to support front-line law enforcement services; and
WHEREAS, The City previously programmed $630,000 of COPS funding for FY24/25; and,
WHEREAS, The City actually received $678,501.23 in COPS FY24/25 funding.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to accept the additional Fiscal Year 2024/25 COPS Funds, bringing the total allocation to $678,501.23.

SECTION 3. The Director of Finance and Management Services is hereby authorized to amend the FY2024/25 Operating Budget, appropriating the total $678,501.23 in revenue and expenditure.

SECTION 4. The Police Department is hereby authorized to encumber and expend the allocated COPS funds for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

SECTION 5. That the City Council finds this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the Packet Page. 868
Resolution No. 2025-296
Resolution No. 2025-296

May 21st, 2025
6 9
6 5
environment. Where it can be seen with certainty, as in this case, that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA.

SECTION 6. Severability. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications, and to this end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable.

SECTION 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21ST day of May, 2025.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 869
Resolution No. 2025-296
Resolution No. 2025-296

May 21st, 2025
6 9
6 5

CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO)
I, Telicia Lopez, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Resolution No. 2025-296, adopted at a regular meeting held on the 21 st day of May 2025 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______
FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______
ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this 22nd Day of May 2025.

Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Packet Page. 870
1 6
5 4
Consent Calendar
City of San Bernardino
Request for Council Action
Date: May 21, 2025
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Bill Gallardo Clayton, Interim City Manager;
Lynn Merrill, Director of Public Works
Department: Public Works
Subject: Adoption of Ordinance No. MC-1651 Amending
Chapter 10.52 of the San Bernadino Municipal Code to
Update the Existing Speed Zones City Wide (All Wards)
Recommendation:

It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Ordinance No. MC-1651 amending Chapter 10.52 (Final Reading) of the San Bernadino Municipal Code to update existing speed zones city wide.

Executive Summary
The Engineering and Traffic Survey was conducted to evaluate the current roadway conditions, traffic flow and overall effectiveness of the existing speed limit speeds in the City. It is intended to ensure that local traffic regulations remain consistent with current roadway conditions, usage patterns, and best practices in traffic engineering.

Since the original survey was conducted in 2016, changes in land use, population growth, travel patterns and vehicle technology have altered travel behaviors, impacting both traffic flow and safety. To address these evolving conditions, the amended Engineering and Traffic Survey includes updated data collection, revised speed zoning recommendations, and targeted safety corridor speed reductions improvements. The proposed updates strive to create a balanced approach to mobility, safety, and compliance, contributing to the overall well-being of the residents and roadway users.

The Public Hearing was held on April 16, 2025 adopting Ordinance No. MC- 1651 - Amending Chapter 10.52 of the San Bernadino Municipal Code to update the existing speed zones city wide.

Background
In California, Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Surveys must be conducted according to guidelines set forth by the California Vehicle Code (CVC) sections 22357 and 22358 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD).

These surveys typically involve measuring prevailing traffic speeds—often using the Packet Page. 871
1 6
5 4
85th percentile criterion—along with evaluating collision history and roadway characteristics. Data is collected under conditions that reflect normal, free-flowing traffic, ensuring the resulting speed recommendations accurately represent real- world driving behaviors. Once completed, E&T Surveys provide the evidence-based foundation for setting or adjusting speed limits, helping local agencies maintain consistency, enhance safety, and reduce speed variability on public roads.

Speed limits determined through the E&T Survey are typically set near the 85th percentile speed, which is the speed at or below which 85% of traffic is traveling.

Research has shown that setting speed limits at this threshold enhances safety and reduces variations in vehicle speeds.

Additionally, Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43), signed into law in October 2021, modifies how speed limits are set in California by providing local jurisdictions with greater flexibility to prioritize road safety. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the California MUTCD was amended in March 2023 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. Under AB 43, cities and counties can now consider factors beyond prevailing traffic speeds—such as pedestrian and cyclist safety, collision history, and roadway conditions when conducting Engineering and Traffic Surveys. This change allows for more complex and specific speed limit setting, particularly in areas with vulnerable road users or higher collision risks, ultimately helping to reduce traffic-related injuries and fatalities. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:

1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].

2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower the speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner.

3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit Packet Page. 872
1 6
5 4
The Public Hearing was held on April 16, 2025, adopting Ordinance No. MC- 1651 Amending Chapter 10.52 of the San Bernadino Municipal Code to update the existing speed zones city wide.

Discussion
The City of San Bernardino has engaged Willdan Engineering, through its on-call consulting contract, to conduct the required Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&T Survey). This collaboration ensures compliance with California Vehicle Code sections mandating that speed limits be established based on professional engineering analyses rather than arbitrary determinations. Willdan’s role involves gathering and reviewing data on roadway conditions, traffic volumes, and collision histories, as well as identifying the 85th percentile speeds. By utilizing Willdan’s expertise, the City aims to adopt speed limits that are consistent with state guidelines while enhancing road safety for drivers.

The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed;

2. Accident history; and

3. Roadway characteristics not readily apparent to the motorist.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by most drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

Average Daily Traffic Counts (ADT and field reviews were conducted at 157 locations during the months of October and November 2023, August and October 2024. Segments that used the 14-year extension did not need speed data or crash data collected.

The 157 segments throughout the City of San Bernardino were reviewed, evaluated with comparing 2016 and 2024 field review and ADT data. No significant changes have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width or traffic volume for 48 street segments. Therefore, based on the above reasons, the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey may be extended up to 14 years from March 2016 to March, 2032.

Safety Corridors – New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating a safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner. Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent E&T Survey performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Packet Page. 873
1 6
5 4
Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.

The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding up, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85- percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43
The City may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8, added through AB 43.The currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&T Survey, the City finds that the speed limit is still more than reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit. If the City decides to use a lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&T Survey and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit or not below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).

Results of the E&TS
The Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) results indicate the following updates to street segment speed limits:
• 48 street segments will retain their current speed limits and qualify for a 14-year extension.
• 90 street segments have recommended changes to the posted speed limit. • 19 street segments will maintain their existing speed limits. • 114 street segments have been designated as safety corridors, with 71 street segments resulting in additional reduced speed limits.

In compliance with state law, the updated speed limits will be established in the Municipal Code through an Ordinance.

On April 16, 2025, the first reading of Ordinance No. MC-1651 took place. The purpose of this action is to conduct the final reading of and adopt Ordinance No.

MC-1651.

Packet Page. 874
1 6
5 4
Between readings of the Ordinance, staff discovered that in Section 10.52.010 of the Ordinance, one of the listed speeds reads as “30 MPH” when it should be “25 MPH” instead. Given that the rest of that Section has the correct speed limit listed in multiple places, Staff attribute this to a typographical or scrivener’s error rather than a substantive change between the first and second reading of the Ordinance and recommend that this Ordinance be approved with this slight modification to address this error.
2021-2025 Strategic Targets and Goals
This project aligns with the City's Key Strategic Target and Goal No. 3: Improved Quality of Life, specifically section C, which focuses on evaluating and enhancing public safety services. By implementing the recommendations from the Engineering and Traffic Survey, the City seeks to enhance traffic flow on these roadway segments and improve overall safety for all users. This data-driven approach ensures smoother travel, better roadway efficiency, and a more reliable transportation network for the entire community.

Fiscal Impact
There is no General Fund impact associated with this action. The installation of the signs will be funded by funds appropriated for the Calstripe Contract at an average cost range from $100 per sign, $150 Sign and Post and $300 per pavement message with an estimated cost range of $25,000.00.

Conclusion
It is recommended that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopt Ordinance No. MC-1651 amending Chapter 10.52 (Final Reading) of the San Bernadino Municipal Code to update existing speed zones city wide.

Attachments
Attachment 1 Ordinance No. MC-1651
Attachment 2 E & TS Study Report
Ward:

All
Synopsis of Previous Council Actions:

April 16, 2025 First reading of Ordinance No. MC-1651, Amending Chapter

10.52 of the San Bernadino Municipal Code to update the existing speed zones City Wide.

February 4, 2016 Final reading MC No-1421 Amended Chapter 10.52 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code for Speed Limits.

November 20, 2012 Ordinance No. MC- 1382 Amended Chapter 10. 52 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code for Speed Limits.

Packet Page. 875
Ordinance No. MC-1651
1 6
7 1
2 ORDINANCE NO. MC-1651

AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL

OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 10.52 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO

MUNICIPAL CODE TO UPDATE EXISTING SPEED ZONES

CITY WIDE
WHEREAS, the City San Bernardino, California (“City”) is a chartered city and municipal corporation, duly organized under the California Constitution and laws of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to comply with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) to have posted speed limits on the street segments surveyed every seven years; and WHEREAS, in California, Engineering and Traffic (E&T) Surveys must be conducted according to guidelines set forth by the California Vehicle Code (CVC) sections 22357 and 22358 and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD); and WHEREAS, once completed, E&T Surveys provide the evidence-based foundation for setting or adjusting speed limits, helping local agencies maintain consistency, enhance safety, and reduce speed variability on public roads; and
WHEREAS, additionally, Assembly Bill 43 (AB 43), signed into law in October 2021, modifies how speed limits are set in California by providing local jurisdictions with greater flexibility to prioritize road safety; and
WHEREAS, under AB 43, cities and counties can now consider factors beyond prevailing traffic speeds—such as pedestrian and cyclist safety, collision history, and roadway conditions when conducting Engineering and Traffic Surveys; and
WHEREAS, the street segments were last surveyed in 2016; and WHEREAS, an updated Engineering and Traffic Survey has been completed to justify and update the posted speed limits along 109 street segments.

WHEREAS, an updated Engineering and Traffic Survey has been completed to justify and extend the posted speed limits along 48 street segments.

THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. The above recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.

SECTION 2. Section 10.52.010 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

Packet Page. 876
Ordinance No. MC-1651
2 6
7 1
2 “10.52.010 TWENTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR
In accordance with and pursuant to the authority of sections 22357, 22358, 22360 of the California Vehicles Code, the Mayor and Common Council do hereby determine and declare upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a Prima Facie speed limit of thirty miles per hour (25 MPH) shall be established upon the following streets or portions thereof in the City:
28th Street between H Street and Waterman Avenue
Commercial Road between Waterman Avenue and Steele Road Palm Avenue between Belmont Avenue and Melvin Avenue
Rialto Avenue between Lena Road and Tippecanoe Avenue”
SECTION 3. Section 10.52.010 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby renumbered to Section 10.52.020 and amended to read as follows:
“10.52.020 THIRTY MILES PER HOUR
In accordance with and pursuant to the authority of sections 22357, 22358, 22360 of the California Vehicles Code, the Mayor and Common Council do hereby determine and declare upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a Prima Facie speed limit of thirty miles per hour (30 MPH) shall be established upon the following streets or portions thereof in the City:
2nd Street between Mt. Vernon Avenue and Waterman Avenue 21st Street between Waterman Avenue and Perris Hill Park Road Arrowhead Avenue between Highland Avenue and Kendall Drive California Street between Baseline Street and Cajon Boulevard Del Rosa Drive between 6th Street and Baseline Street
Del Rosa Avenue between Del Rosa Drive and Marshall Boulevard E Street between Mill Street and Rialto Avenue
E Street between Rialto Avenue and 8th Street
Electric Avenue between Mt. View Avenue and Northpark Boulevard Eucalyptus Avenue between Mill Street and Rialto Avenue G Street between Mill Street and 3rd Street/4th Street
Packet Page. 877
Ordinance No. MC-1651
3 6
7 1
2 H Street between 3rd Street and 6th Street
Highland Avenue between Muscupiabe Avenue and E Street
Highland Avenue between E Street and Sierra Way
Highland Avenue between Arden Avenue and Victoria Avenue Hill Drive between Magnolia Drive and H Street
Hospitality Lane between E Street and Waterman Avenue
Hospitality Lane between Waterman Avenue and Tippecanoe Avenue Marshall Boulevard between Ladera Road and Waterman Avenue Massachusetts Avenue between Baseline Street and Highland Avenue Medical Center Drive between 5th Street and Baseline Street Morgan Road between Melbourne Road and Yardley Street
Mt. Vernon Avenue between Grant Avenue and Rialto Avenue Mt. Vernon Avenue between Rialto Avenue and 7th Street
Mt. Vernon Avenue between 7th Street and 21st Street
Mt. View Avenue between Victoria Street and Highland Avenue Mt. View Avenue between Highland Avenue and Electric Avenue Mt. View Avenue between Electric Avenue and Hill Drive/ Pinehurst Court N. Little between 600' S/ O W Little League Drive and O' Rourke Avenue Palm Avenue (East) between Atlantic Avenue and Piedmont Drive Parkdale Drive between Mt. View Avenue and Valencia Avenue State Street between University Parkway and Sheridan Road University Parkway between Highland Avenue and Baseline Street” SECTION 4. Section 10.52.020 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby renumbered to 10.52.030 and amended to read as follows:
“10.52.030 THIRTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR
Packet Page. 878
Ordinance No. MC-1651
4 6
7 1
2 In accordance with and pursuant to the authority of sections 22357, 22358, 22360 of the California Vehicles Code, the Mayor and Common Council do hereby determine and declare upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a Prima Facie speed limit of thirty-Five miles per hour (35 MPH) shall be established upon the following streets or portions thereof in the City:
5th Street between H Street and Sierra Way
5th Street between Sierra Way and Pedley Road
6th Street between Del Rosa Drive and 200' E/ O Victoria Avenue 16th Street between University Parkway and Medical Center Drive 27th Street between Mt. Vernon Avenue and G Street
48th Street between Kendall Drive and Electric Avenue
Arden Avenue between Pacific Street and Highland Avenue Arrowhead Avenue between 7th Street and Highland Avenue Atlantic Avenue between Palm Avenue and Cienega Court
Auto Center Drive between Showcase Drive S and E Street Baseline Street between H Street and Sierra Way
D Street between 6th Street and 28th Street
Del Rosa Avenue between Marshall Boulevard and 39th Street E Street between Century Avenue and Mill Street
E Street between 8th Street and Baseline Street
E Street between Baseline Street and Highland Avenue
E Street between Highland Avenue and 30th Street
E Street between 30th Street and Kendall Drive
G Street between Inland Center Drive and Mill Street
G Street between 6th Street and 140' North Of 29th Street G Street between 150' South Of 30th Street and Marshall Boulevard Gilbert Street between Waterman Avenue and 207' E/O Cedar Avenue Packet Page. 879
Ordinance No. MC-1651
5 6
7 1
2 H Street between 6th Street and Marshall Boulevard
Highland Avenue between Macy Street and Medical Center Drive Highland Avenue between Medical Center Drive and Muscupiabe Avenue Highland Avenue between Victoria Avenue and Bradford Avenue Hunts Lane between Washington Street and Commercial Road Hunts Lane between Commercial Road and Hospitality Lane K Street between Mill Street and Rialto Avenue
Kendall Drive between E Street and 40th Street
Lena Road between Orange Show and Road Central Avenue
Lena Road between Mill Street and 3rd Street
Lynwood Drive between Valencia Avenue and Del Rosa Avenue Macy Street between Highland Avenue and North City Limits Marshall Boulevard between Little Mountain Drive and Ladera Road Medical Center Drive between Baseline Street and Cajon Boulevard Miramonte Avenue between 23rd Street and Marshall Boulevard Mountain Avenue between 39th Street and 40th Street
Mt. Vernon Avenue between 21st Street and 27th Street
Ohio Avenue between Magnolia Avenue and Pine Avenue
Orange Show Road between E Street and Arrowhead Avenue
Orange Street between Pacific Street and Highland Avenue Orange Street between Highland Avenue and Piedmont Drive Pepper Avenue between Mill Street and Madrona Street
Piedmont Drive between Yuma Drive and Orange Street
Rialto Avenue between Eucalyptus Avenue and Mt. Vernon Avenue Rialto Avenue between Mt Vernon Avenue and G Street
Packet Page. 880
Ordinance No. MC-1651
6 6
7 1
2 Rialto Avenue between G Street and Sierra Way
Rialto Avenue between Sierra Way and Waterman Avenue
Rialto Avenue between Waterman Avenue and Lena Road
Sierra Way between 5th Street and 30th Street
Sierra Way between 30th Street and 40th Street
Tippecanoe Avenue between Harriman Place and San Bernardino Avenue Valencia Avenue between 21st Street and 30th Street
W. Little League Drive between N. Little League Drive and Palm Avenue” SECTION 5. Section 10.52.030 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby renumbered to 10.52.040 and amended to read as follows:
“10.52.040 FORTY MILES PER HOUR
In accordance with and pursuant to the authority of sections 22357, 22358, 22360 of the California Vehicles Code, the Mayor and Common Council do hereby determine and declare upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a Prima Facie speed limit of forty miles per hour (40 MPH) shall be established upon the following streets or portions thereof in the City:
3rd Street between Sierra Way and Waterman Avenue
3rd Street between Waterman Avenue and Lena Road
3rd Street between Lena Road and Leland Norton Way
9th Street between Medical Center Drive and H Street
9th Street between H Street and Sierra Way
9th Street between Sierra Way and Waterman Avenue
40th Street between Electric Avenue and Waterman Avenue 40th Street between Golden Avenue and Mountain Avenue
Arrowhead Avenue between Esparanza Street and Rialto Avenue Baseline Street between California Street and Medical Center Drive Baseline Street between Medical Center Drive and H Street Baseline Street between Sierra Way and Del Rosa Avenue
Packet Page. 881
Ordinance No. MC-1651
7 6
7 1
2 Central Avenue between Arrowhead Avenue and 100' E/O Valley View Avenue Central Avenue between 100' E/O Valley View Avenue/Lena Road and Mt. View Avenue Commercial Road between Hunts Lane and Waterman Avenue
E Street between Hunts Lane and Century Avenue
Foothill Drive between Del Rosa Avenue and Arden Avenue Golden Avenue between Highland Avenue and Lynwood Drive Highland Avenue between Sierra Way and Valencia Avenue
Highland Avenue between Valencia Avenue and Arden Avenue Inland Center Drive between E Street and 1570' Sw/O I Street Kendall Drive between 40th Street and University Parkway Little Mountain Drive between Edgehill Road and 1300' S/ O Sheridan Road Little Mountain Drive between 1300' S/ O Sheridan Road and Northpark Boulevard Meridian Avenue between Randall Avenue and Mill Street
Meridian Avenue between Rialto Avenue and Foothill Boulevard Mill Street between Eucalyptus Avenue and Macy Street
Mill Street between Bordwell Avenue and Waterman Avenue Mill Street between Waterman Avenue and Tippecanoe Avenue Northpark Boulevard between University Parkway and Little Mountain Drive Northpark Boulevard between Little Mountain Drive and Electric Avenue Palm Avenue between Kendall Drive and Belmont Avenue
Pepper Avenue between Randall Avenue and Mill Street
Perris Hill Park Road between Pacific Street and 21st Street Redlands Boulevard between Hunts Lane and Gardena Street Sierra Way between Mill Street and Rialto Avenue
Sierra Way between 40th Street and 48th Street
Packet Page. 882
Ordinance No. MC-1651
8 6
7 1
2 Sterling Avenue between Highland Avenue and Pumalo Street Tippecanoe Avenue between San Bernardino Avenue and 3rd Street University Parkway between Cajon Boulevard and Northpark Boulevard Valencia Avenue between 30th Street and 40th Street
Waterman Avenue between Barton Road and Central Avenue
Waterman Avenue between Rialto Avenue and Highland Avenue Waterman Avenue between Highland Avenue and 30th Street” SECTION 6. Section 10.52.00 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby renumbered to 10.52.050 and amended to read as follows:
“10.52.050 FORTY-FIVE MILES PER HOUR
In accordance with and pursuant to the authority of sections 22357, 22358, 22360 of the California Vehicles Code, the Mayor and Common Council do hereby determine and declare upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a Prima Facie speed limit of forty-five miles per hour (45 MPH) shall be established upon the following streets or portions thereof in the City:
9th Street between Waterman Avenue and 600' E/O Preston Street 30th Street between Little Mountain Drive and Valencia Avenue 40th Street between Kendall Drive and Electric Avenue
40th Street between Waterman Avenue and Golden Avenue
Baseline Street between Meridian Avenue and California Street Campus Parkway between Kendall Drive and Devils Canyon Road Harrison Street between 35th Street and 40th Street
Kendall Drive between University Parkway and Palm Avenue Little Mountain Drive between 27th Street and Edgehill Road Orange Show Road between Arrowhead Avenue and Tippecanoe Avenue Pine Avenue between Kendall Drive and Belmont Avenue
Packet Page. 883
Ordinance No. MC-1651
9 6
7 1
2 Redlands Boulevard between Gardena Street and East City Limits San Bernardino Avenue between Tippecanoe Avenue and Mt. View Avenue Tippecanoe between 9th Street and Baseline Street
Victoria Avenue between Highland Avenue and Lynwood Drive Waterman Avenue between Central Avenue and Rialto Avenue” SECTION 7. Section 10.52.050 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby renumbered to 10.52.060 and amended to read as follows :
“10.52.060 FIFTY MILES PER HOUR
In accordance with and pursuant to the authority of sections 22357, 22358, 22360 of the California Vehicles Code, the Mayor and Common Council do hereby determine and declare upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation that a Prima Facie speed limit of fifty miles per hour (50 MPH) shall be established upon the following streets or portions thereof in the City:
3rd Street between Leland Norton Way and Victoria Avenue Cajon Boulevard between California Street and 23rd Street Highland Avenue between West Boundary (~2664' West Of Macy Street) and Macy Street Hallmark Parkway between University Parkway and Lexington Parkway Industrial Parkway between Lexington Parkway and Palm Avenue” SECTION 8. Certification. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause publication to occur in a newspaper of general circulation and published and circulated in the City in a manner permitted under section 36933 of the Government Code of the State of California.

SECTION 9. CEQA. The Mayor and City Council finds this Ordinance is not a “Project” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15378(a), a “Project” means the whole of an action, which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment. According to Section 15378(b), a Project does not include: (5) Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. Therefore, the Ordinance is considered categorically exempt from CEQA.

SECTION 10. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or any part thereof, is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed each Packet Page. 884
Ordinance No. MC-1651
10 6
7 1
2 section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase be declared unconstitutional. If for any reason any portion of this ordinance is found to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this ordinance shall not be affected.

SECTION 11. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.

APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council and signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk this 21st day of May 2025.

Helen Tran, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Attest:

Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk
Approved as to form:

Sonia Carvalho, City Attorney
Packet Page. 885
Ordinance No. MC-1651
11 6
7 1
2 CERTIFICATION

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO) ss

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO )
I, Telicia Lopez, CMC, Acting City Clerk, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of Ordinance No. MC-1651, introduced by the City Council of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a regular meeting held the 16 th day of April 2025. Ordinance No. MC-1651 was approved and adopted at a regular meeting held the 21st day of May, 2025 by the following vote:

Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
SANCHEZ _____ _____ _______ _______
IBARRA _____ _____ _______ _______
FIGUEROA _____ _____ _______ _______
SHORETT _____ _____ _______ _______
KNAUS _____ _____ _______ _______
FLORES _____ _____ _______ _______
ORTIZ _____ _____ _______ _______
WITNESS my hand and official seal of the City of San Bernardino this ___ day of ____________ 2025.

Telicia Lopez CMC, Acting City Clerk
Packet Page. 886

2025 Engineering and
Traffic Survey Report
March 2025
Willdan Engineering
13191 Crossroads Pkwy N Suite 405
City of Industry, CA 91746
562.908.6200
Packet Page. 887
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

March 25, 2025
Azzam Jabsheh, PE, TE
Deputy Director of Public Works/ City Engineer
201 N. E Street, Suite 200
San Bernardino, CA 92401

Subject: Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) - 2025

Dear Mr. Jabsheh:

As requested, Willdan has completed an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) to justify and update the posted speed limits along 157 street segments in the City of San Bernardino. These segments were last surveyed in 2016 and require an update to comply with the 7-year limitation set forth in the California Vehicle Code (CVC).

We are pleased to submit the enclosed Report that describes the E&TS procedures and contains recommendations for posted speed limits on the City’s arterial and collector street system. A summary of these recommendations is included in the Analysis. Supporting documentation for each speed zone recommendation is provided in the Appendices.

The Report was conducted in accordance with applicable provisions of the CVC, following procedures outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Revision 8 (California MUTCD) dated January 2024, and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Report is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 40802 of the CVC to enable the continued use of radar for traffic speed enforcement.

We appreciate the opportunity to serve the City of San Bernardino and the assistance, cooperation, and guidance afforded to us during the course of this study.

Very truly yours,

WILLDAN

Nicolle Spann, P.E., T.E.

Traffic Engineer
Enclosure

Packet Page. 888
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Table of Contents
Executive Summary ............................................................................................ 4 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 5 Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey ....................................................................................... 6 Speed Sampling ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Crash History .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists ...................................................................................... 8 Safety Corridors – New from AB 43 ....................................................................................................... 8 Land or Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Pedestrians or Bicyclists - New from AB 43 .. 8 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43...................... 9 Survey Conditions ............................................................................................. 10 Survey Locations ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Data Collection ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Speed Data ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Field Review Data ................................................................................................................................ 10 Crash Data ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Safety Corridor Establishment – New from AB 43 .................................................................................. 12 Analysis ............................................................................................................ 13 Engineering and Traffic Survey Criteria ................................................................................................... 13 14-Year Extension Criteria ....................................................................................................................... 14 Speed Limit Recommendations ......................................................................... 15 Recommendation Tables ......................................................................................................................... 15 Table 1 - Summary of E&TS Recommended Speed Limits.................................................................... 16 Table 2 – Summary of 14-Year Extension Recommendations ............................................................. 35 Table 3 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes .......................................................... 37 Table 4 – Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit ......................................................... 40 Segments with Special Conditions ..................................................................... 43 Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists ....................................................................................... 43 Additional 5 mph Speed Reductions ....................................................................................................... 47 Safety Corridors ....................................................................................................................................... 47 Table 5- Segments Identified as Safety Corridors ................................................................................ 47 Land or Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Pedestrians .................................................... 52 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit Application ................................. 53 Table 6- Street Segments Using AB 43 via CVC Section 22358.8 ......................................................... 53

Packet Page. 889
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

APPENDIX B
Radar Speed Distribution Forms

APPENDIX C
Survey Equipment

APPENDIX D
Safety Corridor Factor Weights & Thresholds
Citywide Safety Corridor Table
Citywide Safety Corridor Map

APPENDIX E
2025 Recommended Speed Limit Map

APPENDIX F
Legislative References

Table of Recommendations
Table
Total Number of
Segments Applied
Page
Table 1 - Summary of E&TS Recommended Speed Limits 109 16 Table 2 - Summary of 14- Year Extension Recommendations 48 35 Table 3 - Street Segments with Recommended Changes to the Posted Speed Limit 90 37
Table 4 - Recommended Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit (Including Segments with 14-Year Extension Applied) 67 40 Table 5 – Segments Identified as Safety Corridors 114 47 Table 6 –Street Segments Using AB 43 via CVC Section 22358.8 1 53 Packet Page. 890
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Executive Summary
The adoption of an Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS) is an important step in ensuring that speed limits on the City’s roadways are set in compliance with State regulations, promote public safety and reflect current traffic conditions. This process aligns with the California Vehicle Code (CVC) and the guidelines outlined in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD).

The City of San Bernardino E&TS evaluates roadway conditions, prevailing traffic speeds, and collision history to establish safe, reasonable, and enforceable speed limits. It ensures that speed limits are based on objective data, supporting efficient traffic flow while prioritizing the safety of all road users, including pedestrians and bicyclists.

Packet Page. 891
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Introduction
This E&TS is intended to be the basis for the establishment, revision, and enforcement of speed limits for selected streets within the City of San Bernardino. This E&TS presents recommended speed limits for 157 street segments in the City of San Bernardino. E&T Surveys are required by the State of California to establish intermediate speed limits on local, major, secondary, collector, and arterial streets and to enforce those limits using radar or other speed measuring devices. Historically, these surveys must be updated every 7 to 14 years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions, and can be enforced per CVC Section 40802.

E&T Surveys are prepared under the direction of CVC Sections 627,22350-22359, and 40801-40803. The CVC also requires that the surveys be conducted based on the methodology required by the California MUTCD Revision 8 (California MUTCD) dated January 2024.

Assembly Bill No. 43 (AB 43), signed in October 2021, has given local agencies more leeway in lowering and maintaining speed limits aimed at enhancing traffic safety. The California Vehicle Code was amended in 2022 and the California MUTCD was amended in March 2023 to implement laws and guidelines with the changes set forth in AB 43. There were three major changes to how speed limits can be recommended under AB 43 as follows:

1. An E&T Survey conducted more than 7 years ago may be extended to 14 years (previously to 10 years) if a traffic engineer certifies that no changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred [CVC 40802 (c)(2)(B)(i)(II)].

2. A local authority may establish and designate safety corridors throughout their jurisdiction. The local authority may recommend a speed limit with an additional five mile per hour reduction on segments designated as safety corridors. Local authorities may not lower a speed limit under this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in March 2025, this report reflects lowering speeds on these designating the roadway segments.

3. If a local authority, after completing an E&T Survey, finds that the speed limit is still reasonable or safe, the local authority may retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

This E&TS was requested by the City for the proper posting of speed limits and to enable the Police Department to utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. CVC Sections 40801 and 40802 require E&T Surveys that verify the prima facie speed limit before enforcement by such a device is legal. The law further specifies that these surveys be conducted every 5 years. The surveys can be extended to 7 years provided the City’s Police Department(s) have completed a 24-hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)].

Posted speed limits are primarily established to protect the public by mitigating the risks posed by reckless and unpredictable driving behavior. The posted speed limits provide law enforcement with a clearly understood method to identify and apprehend violators of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This law states that "No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is Packet Page. 892
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property." The posted speed limit gives motorists a clear warning of the maximum speed that is reasonable and prudent under typical driving conditions.

The basic fundamentals for establishing speed limits recognize that the majority of drivers behave in a safe and reasonable manner, and therefore, the normally careful and competent actions of a reasonable driver should be considered legal. Speed limits established on these fundamentals conform to the consensus that those who drive the highway determine what speed is reasonable and safe, not on the judgment of one or a few individuals. A radar speed study is usually conducted to record the prevailing speed of reasonable drivers.

Speed limits are also established to advise drivers of conditions which may not be readily apparent to a reasonable driver. For this reason, accident history, roadway conditions, traffic characteristics, and land use must also be analyzed before determining speed limits. Speed limit changes are usually made in coordination with physical changes in roadway conditions or roadside developments. Unusually short zones of less than one-half mile in length should be avoided to reduce driver confusion.

The E&T Surveys for the City were conducted in accordance with procedures outlined in the California MUTCD and as required by Section 627 of the CVC. The Code further describes three elements of an E&T Survey:

1. Measurement of prevailing speed based on the 85th percentile rule

2. Accident history on the roadway

3. Roadway conditions and other relevant factors that are not readily apparent to the motorist.

Additionally, it is generally accepted that speed limits cannot be successfully enforced without voluntary compliance by a majority of drivers. Consequently, only the driver whose behavior is clearly out of line with the normal flow of traffic is usually targeted for enforcement.

Elements Of the Engineering and Traffic Survey
The California MUTCD specifies the methodology to be used for completing E&T Surveys. This methodology includes an evaluation of current vehicle speeds, accident history and conditions not readily apparent to motorists. The basic elements of the E&TS are discussed in more detail as follows:

Speed Sampling
Existing vehicle speeds are surveyed by a certified radar operator with a calibrated radar unit in an unmarked vehicle. Speed samples are taken for each segment representing a statistically significant sample of current traffic. This data is then evaluated to identify the distribution of speeds. A key element in the evaluation is the identification of the 85th percentile speed. The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic travels. This threshold represents what is historically found to be a safe and reasonable speed for most drivers based on common roadway conditions. A speed limit is established in the three options below.

Options:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed – A speed limit is established at the nearest 5-mile per hour increment to the 85th percentile speed.

Packet Page. 893
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require rounding down, the posted speed may be reduced by an additional 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5. ▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th- percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).

If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&T Survey shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Section 627 and 22358.5.

The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round up to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round up, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey. However, it is best to apply MUTCD Option 2 in these scenarios as it will not require documentation of conditions and justification to lower the speed limit.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 - Instead of rounding up to 35 mph, the speed limit can be established at 30 mph, but no further reduction can be applied.

If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, the 3 options may be applied as follows:
▪ Closest to 85th Percentile Speed - The 85th percentile speed would round down to the nearest 5- mph increment. The speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed.
▪ California MUTCD Option 1 - Reduction using Segments with Special Conditions - The first step is to round down, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by this option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&T Survey.
▪ California MUTCD Option 2 – This option is not applicable to 85th percentile speeds that already round down to the nearest 5-mph increment using the “Closest to 85th Percentile Speed” option.

Packet Page. 894
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

8 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Crash History
Reported crashes reviewed from California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database are reviewed for each street segment to determine if there is a higher than expected average rate of crashes. A segment that has an above-average crash rate typically suggests conditions that are not readily apparent to motorists.

Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
Each street segment is field inspected to identify roadway conditions that may not be readily apparent to motorists. A determination is made whether any conditions are significant and warrant the recommendation of the speed limit 5 mph below the basic speed limit.

The Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning.

Conditions not readily apparent to motorists include the considerations of crash history, poor visibility, and the safety of bicyclists and pedestrians.

Safety Corridors – New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7, a new section added through AB 43, to additionally lower the speed limit by designating a safety corridor, shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner. Since the E&TS was completed in 2025 on these designated roadway segments, this report reflects lowering speeds using the application of safety corridors.

Data used to determine a safety corridor may be from the most recent E&T Survey performed. The crash data source may include, but is not limited to, California Highway Patrol’s (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS). The prioritized subset of safety corridors shall:

1. Identify specific locations with high crash occurrences.

2. Identify corridor-level segments with a pattern of crash reoccurrence.

3. Be able to be stratified by mode.

The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding up, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Land or Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Pedestrians or Bicyclists - New from AB 43
The provisions of CVC Section 22358.7 to additional lower the speed limit (by designating safety corridor or on portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians), shall not be applicable until actions required per CVC Section 22358.7 by Department of Transportation and Judicial Council are completed or June 30, 2024, whichever is sooner.

A land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians is a portion of the highway where one or more of any of the generators listed below are present within a distance of 1320 Packet Page. 895
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

9 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

feet. Crash data that demonstrates a highway segment is within the top twenty percent of pedestrian and/ or bicyclist fatalities or serious injuries over a three-to-five year period may be used in lieu of one of the generators listed below.

If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. Refer to Section 22358.6(b).

The total reduction in the speed limit using the nearest 5 mph increment, rounding up, rounding down and using 5 mph speed reduction, plus an additional 5 mph speed reduction for safety corridor designation, shall not exceed 12.4 mph from the 85-percentile speed. Refer to CVC Section 22358.6(e).

Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit – New from AB 43 The City may retain the currently adopted speed limit without further reduction or restore the immediately prior adopted speed limit without further reduction as provided in CVC Section 22358.8, added through AB 43.

The currently adopted speed limit or immediately prior adopted speed limit shall only be retained, by ordinance, if after completing an E&T Survey, the City finds that the speed limit is still more than Packet Page. 896
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

reasonable or safe, and that speed limit was established with an E&T Survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.

If the City decides to use a lower speed limit based on CVC Section 22358.8, after completing an E&T Survey and finding that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, it shall not be reduced by any more than 5 mph from the currently adopted speed limit or not below the immediately prior speed limit. Refer to CVC Section 22358.8(b).

Survey Conditions
Survey Locations
The procedures described below describe the criteria and methods used to survey selected streets within the City of San Bernardino. The specific location of the radar speed survey for each street segment was selected after considering the following:

1. Minimum stop sign and traffic signal influence.

2. Minimum visibility restrictions.

3. Non-congested traffic flow away from intersections and driveways.

4. Minimum influence from curves or other roadway conditions that would affect the normal operation of a vehicle.

Data Collection
Data of existing conditions was obtained including prevailing speed of vehicles, traffic crashes, visibility restrictions, and roadway conditions within the community. ADT and field reviews were conducted at 157 locations during the months of October and November 2023, August and October 2024. Segments that used the 14-year extension did not need speed data or crash data collected. Refer to the Analysis Section for additional explanation on the 14-year extension.

Speed Data
Radar speed measurements were conducted at 109 locations during the month of October and November 2023, and August and October 2024. The radar speed distribution forms are in Appendix B.

All surveys were conducted in good weather conditions, during off-peak hours on weekdays. The radar unit was operated from an unmarked vehicle to minimize any influence on driver behavior. Typically, a minimum sample size of 100 vehicles or the total samples during a maximum period of 2 hours were obtained for each segment. Traffic speeds in both directions were recorded for individual segments.

Field Review Data
A field review was conducted for each of the selected street segments in the City with consideration for the following factors:

1. Street width and alignment;

2. Pedestrian activity and traffic flow characteristics; Packet Page. 897
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

11 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

3. Number of lanes and other channelization and striping patterns;

4. Frequency of intersections, driveways, and on-street parking;

5. Location of stop signs and other regulatory traffic control devices;

6. Visibility obstructions;

7. Land use and proximity to schools;

8. Pedestrian and bicycle usage;

9. Uniformity with existing speed zones and those in adjacent jurisdictions; and

10. Any other unusual condition not readily apparent to the driver.

Crash Data
Crash data was obtained from the California Highway Patrol’s Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) electronic crash database. For this study, crash data was used from the latest 2 years of reported accidents from April 1, 2021 to March 31, 2024. The crash rates for the 109 segments are expressed in crashes per million vehicle miles (C/MVM). To calculate these rates, 24-hour traffic volumes were collected for each street segment. This information was then entered into the following formula to determine the crash rate:

𝑹 = 𝑪 × 𝟏, 𝟎𝟎𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝒕 × 𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔
𝒚𝒆𝒂𝒓 × 𝒍 × 𝒗

C = Number of midblock crashes over time period
R = Crash Rate (crashes/million vehicle miles)
t = Time Period Covered (in years)
l = Length of Segment (miles)
v = Traffic Volume (average daily traffic)
The segment crash rate was then compared to the average statewide crash rate of similar roadways.

The average statewide crash rates were obtained from 2022 Collision Data on California State Highways published by Caltrans.

Packet Page. 898
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

12 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Safety Corridor Establishment – New from AB 43
Safety corridors were established under the guidelines set forth in the California MUTCD. Fatal and severe injury crash data was gathered using UC Berkeley’s Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS) from April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2024.

Weighted factors were established across the roadway network to identify which segments are classified as a safety corridor. The weighted factors for the 157 segments are expressed in factors per mile. This information was entered into the following formula to determine the weighted factor for each segment:

𝑭 = 𝟐𝑻 + 𝟏𝟎𝑺 + 𝟏𝟎𝑺𝑯 + 𝟓𝑷 − 𝟏𝑫 + 𝟏𝑬 + 𝟎. 𝟓𝑽 + 𝟏𝑺𝒁
𝒍
F = Weighted Factor per mile
T = Total Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
S = Speed Related Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
SH = Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes Near Schools
and During School Hours (7am- 4pm)
P = Pedestrian or Bicycle Related Fatal and Serious
Injury Crashes
D = DUI Related Fatal and Serious Injury Crashes
E = Segment within a census tract with a
CalEnviroScreen 4.0 Percentile greater than 75%
V = Segment within a census tract with a
population ages 65 and older over 16% and/ or a
population ages 15 and younger under 23%
according to the American Community Survey
SZ = Segment in a School Zone
l = Length of Segment (miles)
The safety corridor established within the 616.4-mile roadway network within the City of San Bernardino cannot exceed 1/5 of the total roadway network1 (123.28 miles) of the City. There were 218 fatal and severe injury crashes observed in the City of San Bernardino within the 5-year study period. The safety corridor network may include at least 25% of fatal and severe injury crashes2. This translates to at least 40 fatal and severe injury crashes in the City’s safety corridor network.

For the City of San Bernardino, any segment with a weighted factor over 1.6 is considered a safety corridor. This threshold was selected to prioritize segments with fatal and severe injury crashes that includes the most segments designated as a safety corridor as allowed within the constraints of not exceeding 1/5 of the total roadway network.

𝑺𝒂𝒇𝒆𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒓𝒊𝒅𝒐𝒓: 𝑭 > 𝟏. 𝟔
A spreadsheet that identifies the total length of roadways established as a safety corridor, and criteria made to establish safety corridors using the above criteria is provided in Appendix D. Additionally, Appendix D includes a citywide map showing where the established safety corridors are located.

1 Reference CVC 22358.7(a)(1)
2 Reference California MUTCD Chapter 2B.13 - 12t
Packet Page. 899
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

13 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Analysis
Engineering and Traffic Survey Criteria
For the 109 segments that did not use the 14-year extension, survey data was compiled and analyzed to determine the recommended speed limit in accordance with several criteria contained in The California MUTCD. Some of the criteria used are:

A. The critical speed or 85th percentile speed is that speed at or below which 85 percent of the traffic is moving. This speed is the baseline value in determining what the majority of drivers believe is safe and reasonable. Speed limits set higher than the critical speed are not considered reasonable and safe. Speed limits set lower than the critical speed make a large number of reasonable drivers "unlawful," and do not facilitate the orderly flow of traffic. The “basic speed limit” is the nearest 5 mph increment to the 85th percentile speed.

B. The 10 mile per hour (mph) pace speed is the 10 mph increment that contains the highest percentage of vehicles. It is a measure of the dispersion of speeds across the range of the samples surveyed. An accepted practice is to keep the speed limit within the 10 mph pace while considering the critical speed and other factors that might require a speed lower than the critical speed.

C. The crash rate for each street segment is compared to average crash rates that can be reasonably expected to occur on streets and highways in other jurisdictions, in proportion to the volume of traffic per lane mile. These average crash rates have been developed by the State of California and are considered reasonable for use in the City of San Bernardino.

The Engineering and Traffic Survey Forms, presented in Appendix A, illustrate results of a thorough evaluation of available data and recommend a speed limit for each of the 109 street segments surveyed based on the guidelines for an Engineering and Traffic Survey set forth by the California MUTCD and the CVC. A complete summary of all 109 E&TS recommendations is shown in Table 1. In each case, the recommended speed limit was consistent with the prevailing behavior as demonstrated by the radar speed measurements. Typically, a speed limit in the upper range of the 10-mile pace was selected unless a crash rate significantly higher than expected was discovered or roadway conditions not readily apparent to the driver were identified. Any segments with recommended speed limits 5 mph or more below the basic speed limit are fully explained later in the Segments with Special Conditions section of this report.

The California State Legislature, in adopting Section 22358.5 of the CVC, has made it clear that physical conditions, such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to a driver, in the absence of other factors, would not be the basis for special downward speed zoning. In these cases, the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350) is sufficient to regulate such conditions.

Packet Page. 900
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

14 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

14-Year Extension Criteria
California Vehicle Code Sections 40801 and 40802 require Engineering and Traffic Surveys (E &TS) to establish or revise prima facie speed limits on certain streets within a local jurisdiction before law enforcement can utilize radar or other electronic speed measuring devices for speed enforcement. These surveys must be updated every five, seven, or fourteen years to ensure the speeds reflect current conditions as dictated by the California Vehicle Code. The surveys can be extended from 5 to 7 years provided the City’s police officer(s) have completed a 24 -hour radar operator course [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(I)]. Additionally, some surveys may be extended to fourteen years if the City Traffic Engineer certifies there have been no significant changes to the roadway segment(s) or traffic conditions [CVC 40802(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)]. These provisions assure that posted speed limits are kept reasonably current.

The 157 segments throughout the City of San Bernardino were reviewed with comparing 2016 and 2024 field review and ADT data. No significant changes have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume for 48 street segments. Therefore, based on the above reasons, the most recent Engineering and Traffic Survey may be extended up to 14 years from March 2016 of the particular E&TS conducted for street segments identified in Table 2.

Segments with 14-Year Extension applied in this survey were previously surveyed in 2016. An E&TS shall be performed for these segments in 2032.

Packet Page. 901
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

15 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Speed Limit Recommendations
The recommendations contained in this Report are intended to establish prima facie speed limits. They are not intended to be absolute for all prevailing conditions. All prima facie speed violations are actually violations of the basic speed law (CVC Section 22350). This statute states that a person shall not drive a vehicle at a speed greater than is safe having regard for traffic, roadway, and weather conditions. A prima facie limit is intended to establish a maximum safe speed under normal conditions.

Recommendation Tables
Tables 1-4 summarizing the recommendations are referenced below and included in the following pages. The speed limit recommendations have been organized into the following four tables.

Recommendation Table
Total Number
of Segments
Table 1 - Summary of E&TS Recommended Speed Limits 109 Table 2 - Summary of 14- Year Extension Recommendations 48 Table 3 - Street Segments with Recommended Changes to the Posted Speed Limit 90 Table 4 - Recommended Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit (Including Segments with 14-Year Extension Applied) 67

Tables 1 and 2 together summarize all 157 segment recommendations, split by the analysis type that the recommendations were made: segments with speed limit recommendations made through a full E&TS (Table 1) and segments with speed limit recommendations through the 14-year extension (Table 2).

Tables 3 and 4 together summarize all 157 segment recommendations, split by whether or not the speed limit is recommended to change: segments with speed limit changes (Table 3) and segments with speed limits staying the same (Table 4).

Packet Page. 902
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
2nd St Mt. Vernon Ave Waterman Ave 21,431 390.96 30-390.172.01 72 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**35**1 %
3rd St Sierra Way Waterman St 5,969 420.96 33-420.000.36 70 Closest to 85th Speed40402 % 3rd St Waterman Ave Lena Rd 11,018 470.96 38-470.270.61 67 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
40**45**3 %
3rd St Lena Rd Leland Norton
Way
21,490 440.96 34-430.221.14 71 California MUTCD Option 2 ****40**45**4 % 3rd St Leland Norton
Way
Victoria Ave 13,994 561.40 42-510.161.26 56 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
50NP5 %
5th St H St Sierra Way 24,164 370.96 29-380.510.89 87 Closest to 85th Speed ****35**NP**6 % 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 16 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 903
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
5th St Sierra Way Pedley Rd 10,915 461.24 34-430.171 65 Hidden Driveways, Uncontrolled Crosswalk,
Sidewalk Gaps & Safety
Corridor ****
35**40**7 %
6th St Del Rosa Dr 200' E/O Victoria
Ave
2,705 431.618 34-430.001.42 75 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
35**40**8 %
16th St University Pkwy Medical Center Dr 5,451 410.96 30-390.450.74 74 Hidden Driveways, Moderate Pedestrian Use
35**NP**9 %
21st St Waterman Ave Perris Hill Park Rd 9,233 380.96 28-370.360.55 71 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
303510 %
28th St H St Waterman Ave 2,232 311.68 22-310.321.26 79 Moderate Pedestrian Use, Uncontrolled Crosswalk ****
25**25**11 %
40th St Waterman Ave Golden Ave 8,040 520.96 41-500.911 67 Uncontrolled Crosswalk, Moderate Pedestrian Use
45**45**12 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 17 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 904
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Arden Ave Pacific St Highland Ave 10,427 420.94 31-400.540.49 70 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
354013 %
Arrowhead Ave Highland Ave Kendall Dr 2,916 390.96 30-391.271.73 67 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**35**14 %
Auto Center Dr Showcase Dr S E St 5,988 381.68 30-390.310.49 83 California MUTCD Option 2 ****35**NP**15 % Baseline St Meridian Ave California St 11,583 521.4 43-520.791 68 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
455516 %
Baseline St California St Medical Center Dr 16,155 421.4 31-400.360.47 65 Closest to 85th Speed404017 % Baseline St H St Sierra Way 33,735 370.96 29-380.580.89 87 Closest to 85th Speed ****35NP18 % 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 18 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 905
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Cajon Blvd California St 23rd St 13,011 590.65 50-590.051.4 52 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
50**55**19 %
California St Baseline St Cajon Blvd 7,380 341.68 26-350.402.15 92 California MUTCD Option 2 ****304020 % Campus Pkwy Kendall Dr Devils Canyon Rd 3,881 520.94 41-500.000.71 58 Moderate Pedestrian Use45**NP**21 % Central Ave 100' E/O Valley
View Ave/Lena Rd
Mountain View
Ave
11,548 490.96 39-480.101.56 51 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
404522 %
Commercial Rd Hunts Ln Waterman Ave 2,326 421.68 33-420.000.55 61 Closest to 85th Speed40**NP**23 % Commercial Rd Waterman Ave Steele Rd 2,333 321.68 23-320.000.25 56 Moderate Pedestrian Use252524 % 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 19 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 906
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
D St 6th St 28th St 2,881 410.96 31-400.862.22 59 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
354525 %
Del Rosa Dr 6th St Baseline St 7,817 360.96 27-360.150.76 73 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**45**26 %
Del Rosa Ave Del Rosa Dr Marshall Blvd 22,096 380.96 29-380.631.18 81 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**40**27 %
Del Rosa Ave Marshall Blvd 39th St 6,146 400.94 29-380.180.81 77 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**45**28 %
E St Hunts Ln Century Ave 12,712 430.94 34-430.071 68 California MUTCD Option 240**40**29 % E St Century Ave Mill St 13,024 410.94 32-410.551.15 77 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
354030 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 20 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 907
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
E St Mill St Rialto Ave 8,152 380.96 29-380.570.59 76 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**NP**31 %
E St Rialto Ave 8th St 6,380 370.96 27-360.480.89 77 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**30**32 %
E St 8th St Baseline St 5,896 411.68 30-390.620.5 76 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**35**33 %
E St Baseline St Highland Ave 8,042 420.96 32-410.911 69 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**35**34 %
E St Highland Ave 30th St 6,299 400.96 30-390.210.69 70 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**35**35 %
E St 30th St Kendall Dr 21,997 430.96 30-390.690.78 61 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
35**40**36 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 21 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 908
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Electric Ave Mountain View
Ave
Northpark Blvd 9,112 411.68 32-410.100.99 72 Residential Density, Uncontrolled Crosswalk &
Safety Corridor ****
30**40/35**37 %
Eucalyptus Ave Mill St Rialto Ave 7,580 371.68 27-360.480.5 80 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**35**38 %
G St Inland Center Dr Mill St 3,126 381.68 28-370.000.22 71 California MUTCD Option 235**NP**39 % G St Mill St 3rd St/4th St 5,436 360.94 28-370.540.94 85 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
304040 %
H St 3rd St 6Th St 8,404 370.96 29-380.620.35 80 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**NP**41 %
Harrison St 35th St 40th St 2,550 471.24 38-470.000.72 69 Closest to 85th Speed45**NP**42 % 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 22 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 909
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Highland Ave West Boundary
(~2664' West Of
Macy St)
Macy St 11,144 551.40 44-530.480.51 65 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
50NP43 %
Highland Ave Macy St Medical Center Dr 18,805 420.96 30-390.400.98 72 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35NP44 %
Highland Ave Medical Center Dr Muscupiabe Ave 16,597 400.96 30-390.330.84 75 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**35/40**45 %
Highland Ave Muscupiabe Ave E St 22,373 370.96 27-360.370.77 77 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
303546 %
Highland Ave E St Sierra Way 21,209 340.96 25-340.510.51 80 California MUTCD Option 2 ****30**35**47 % Highland Ave Arden Ave Victoria Ave 43,750 380.96 28-370.470.49 69 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**NP**48 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 23 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 910
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Highland Ave Victoria Ave Bradford Ave 23,622 400.96 31-400.261.21 72 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**NP**49 %
Hill Dr Magnolia Dr H St 1,921 341.68 25-340.000.62 85 California MUTCD Option 230**35**50 % Hospitality Ln E St Waterman Ave 8,447 381.23 29-380.260.83 69 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**35**51 %
Hospitality Ln Waterman Ave Tippecanoe Ave 8,916 360.94 27-361.111.11 85 High Collision Rate303552 % Hunts Ln Washington St Commercial Rd 10,528 450.96 34-430.000.52 68 Uncontrolled Crosswalk & Safety Corridor ****
354053 %
Hunts Ln Commercial Rd Hospitality Ln 18,030 370.94 29-380.000.52 85 Closest to 85th Speed35**NP**54 % 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 24 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 911
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Kendall Dr E St 40th St 11,391 410.96 32-410.881 66 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
354555 %
Kendall Dr 40th St University Pkwy 16,498 490.96 41-500.301.64 67 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
405056 %
Kendall Dr University Pkwy Palm Ave 20,225 500.96 39-480.322 62 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
45**50**57 %
Lena Rd Orange Show Rd Central Ave 2,212 420.96 32-410.000.42 70 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**NP**58 %
Lena Rd Mill St 3rd St 3,546 460.96 35-441.180.87 53 High Crash History & Safety Corridor ****
35**NP**59 %
Little Mountain
Dr
27th St Edgehill Rd 9,859 520.96 38-470.290.96 60 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
45**45**60 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 25 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 912
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Little Mountain
Dr
Edgehill Rd 1300' S/O
Sheridan Rd
9,555 460.96 36-450.761 72 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
40**45**61 %
Little Mountain
Dr
1300' S/O
Sheridan Rd
Northpark Blvd 5,429 450.96 33-420.671 67 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
404562 %
Lynwood Dr Valencia Ave Del Rosa Ave 1,987 430.96 30-392.021.14 66 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
35**40**63 %
Macy St Highland Ave North City Limits 12,408 421.68 30-390.390.19 70 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**35**64 %
Marshall Blvd Ladera Rd Waterman Ave 4,736 371.68 26-350.501.54 72 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
303565 %
Massachusetts
Ave
Baseline St Highland Ave 4,474 351.68 26-350.411 70 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**35**66 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 26 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 913
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Medical Center
Dr
5th St Baseline St 11,699 360.96 26-350.350.89 84 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**35**67 %
Medical Center
Dr
Baseline St Cajon Blvd 8,266 410.96 32-410.611.46 77 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**40**68 %
Mill St Eucalyptus Ave Macy St 13,019 460.96 36-450.140.99 67 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
40**NP**69 %
Mill St Waterman Ave Tippecanoe Ave 15,634 450.94 34-430.111.1 56 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
40**45**70 %
Morgan Rd Melbourne Rd Yardley St 1,108 371.68 27-360.000.65 67 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
303571 %
Mt. Vernon Ave Grant Ave Rialto Ave 9,649 370.96 27-360.431.1 80 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**40**72 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 27 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 914
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Mt. Vernon Ave Rialto Ave 7th St 7,888 340.96 26-350.300.76 84 California MUTCD Option 2 ****30**NP**73 % Mt. Vernon Ave 7th St 21st St 10,314 390.96 29-380.341.56 77 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**35**74 %
Mt. Vernon Ave 21St St 27th St 13,245 361.68 28-370.000.53 85 Closest to 85th Speed35**35**75 % Mt. View Ave Victoria St Highland Ave 3,921 420.96 33-420.951.71 67 High Crash History & Safety Corridor ****
304076 %
Mt. View Ave Highland Ave Electric Ave 4,452 391.68 29-380.121.72 63 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30**40**77 %
Mt. View Ave Electric Ave Hill Dr/Pinehurst
Ct
4,541 361.68 27-360.311.29 72 Residential Density, Hidden Driveways
30**35**78 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 28 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 915
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
N. Little League
Dr
600' S/O W Little
League Dr
O'Rourke Ave 3,013 401.68 27-360.000.77 61 Uncontrolled Crosswalks, Hidden Driveways & Land Use
that Generates High
Concentrations of Pedestrians
30**25**79 %
Ohio Ave Magnolia Ave Pine Ave 775 371.68 22-310.001.32 54 Closest to 85th Speed35**NP**80 % Orange Show Rd E St Arrowhead Ave 25,306 380.96 28-370.290.25 75 California MUTCD Option 2 ****35**40**81 % Orange Show Rd Arrowhead Ave Tippecanoe Ave 16,054 480.94 37-460.391.73 68 California MUTCD Option 245**50**82 % Orange St Pacific St Highland Ave 2,464 381.68 28-370.000.49 71 California MUTCD Option 2353583 % Orange St Highland Ave Piedmont Dr 4,533 431.68 32-410.000.53 68 Retain 2016 E&T Recommendation
35**35**84 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 29 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 916
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Palm Ave Kendall Dr Belmont Ave 15,155 430.96 33-420.110.55 76 California MUTCD Option 240**45**85 % Palm Ave Belmont Ave Melvin Ave 947 341.68 23-320.000.64 64 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
25**25**86 %
Palm Ave (East) Atlantic Ave Piedmont Dr 7,901 350.96 27-360.180.65 83 Uncontrolled Crosswalk30**35**87 % Parkdale Dr Mountain View
Ave
Valencia Ave 4,251 361.68 26-350.260.83 72 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
30**NP**88 %
Pepper Ave Randall Ave Mill St 21,504 460.96 37-460.000.5 70 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
40**45**89 %
Pepper Ave Mill St Madrona St 18,682 460.96 37-460.311.71 67 Moderate Pedestrian Use, Uncontrolled Crosswalks &
Safety Corridor ****
35**45**90 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 30 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 917
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Piedmont Dr Yuma Dr Orange St 1,018 351.68 27-360.000.73 87 Closest to 85th Speed35**NP**91 % Pine Ave Kendall Dr Belmont Ave 5,242 491.24 40-490.000.67 59 California MUTCD Option 245**50**92 % Rialto Ave Eucalyptus Ave Mt. Vernon Ave 13,334 400.96 33-420.582.5 76 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
354593 %
Rialto Ave Mt Vernon Ave G St 10,806 400.96 31-400.200.86 69 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
353594 %
Rialto Ave G St Sierra Way 9,880 360.96 26-350.360.76 77 Closest to 85th Speed ****35**35**95 % Rialto Ave Sierra Way Waterman Ave 7,324 370.96 28-370.690.36 75 Closest to 85th Speed ****35**NP**96 % 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 31 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 918
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Rialto Ave Waterman Ave Lena Rd 5,881 450.96 34-431.000.62 62 High Crash History & Safety Corridor ****
35**NP**97 %
Rialto Ave Lena Rd Tippecanoe Ave 4,061 371.68 26-350.000.46 70 Residential Density & Safety Corridor ****
25**25**98 %
Sierra Way 5th St 30th St 7,043 400.96 30-390.702.59 73 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**40**99 %
State St University Pkwy Sheridan Rd 5,050 331.68 25-341.000.54 92 California MUTCD Option 2 ****30**NP**100 % Tippecanoe Ave Harriman Pl San Bernardino
Ave
27,958 411.03 31-400.300.75 67 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**40**101 %
Tippecanoe Ave San Bernardino
Ave
3Rd St 29,164 451.03 33-420.291.86 70 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
4040/45102 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 32 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 919
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
University Pkwy Highland Ave Baseline St 13,433 390.94 29-380.001.1 69 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
30NP103 %
University Pkwy Cajon Blvd Northpark Blvd 19,632 471.03 37-460.401.76 64 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
40**50**104 %
Valencia Ave 21st St 30th St 10,826 430.94 34-430.330.77 62 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
35**40**105 %
Valencia Ave 30th St 40th St 7,977 461.24 35-440.001.34 74 California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor ****
4045106 %
Victoria Ave Highland Ave Lynwood Dr 32,123 450.96 33-420.380.75 63 Closest to 85th Speed45**45**107 % W. Little League
Dr
N. Little League Dr Palm Ave 4,950 411.68 32-410.610.91 85 Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor ****
35**NP**108 %
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 33 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 920
Table 1 - Summary of ETS Recommended Speed Limits
Street From To ADT
Dist.
(mi.)
Collision
Rate***
Exp.
85%
Speed
10 mi.

Pace
% in
PaceAct.

Posted
Speed
Limit
Rec.

Speed
Limit Comments*No.

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Waterman Ave Barton Rd Central Ave 35,331 430.94 31-400.262.35 69 California MUTCD Option 2 ****40**50**109 % 2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report
* See "Segments with Special Conditions" section for comments on segments using special conditions or AB 43 to maintain the previous or prior ET 34 *** Accident rate units: Fatal and Injury Collisions per One Million Vehicle Miles ** 25 mph when children are present
Act.: Actual Collision Rate
Exp.: Expected Collision Rate based on the Caltrans 2021 Crash Data on California State Highways Rate **** Designated Safety Corridor
Rec.: Recommended Speed Limit
Packet Page. 921
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

35 Table 2 – Summary of 14-Year Extension Recommendations Table 2- Summary of 14-Year Extension Recommendations
ID Street From To Speed Limit
110 9th Street Medical Center Drive H Street 40
111 9th Street H Street Sierra Way 40
112 9th Street Sierra Way Waterman Avenue 40
113 9th Street Waterman Avenue 600' E/O Preston Street 45 114 27th Street Mt. Vernon Avenue G Street 35
115 30th Street Little Mountain Drive Valencia Avenue 45 116 40th Street Kendall Drive Electric Avenue 45
117 40th Street Electric Avenue Waterman Avenue 40
118 40th Street Golden Avenue Mountain Avenue 40
119 48th Street Kendall Drive Electric Avenue 35
120 Arrowhead Avenue Esparanza Street Rialto Avenue 40
121 Arrowhead Avenue 7th Street Highland Avenue 35
122 Atlantic Avenue Palm Avenue Cienega Court 35
123 Baseline Street Medical Center Drive H Street 40
124 Baseline Street Sierra Way Del Rosa Avenue 40
125 Central Avenue Arrowhead Avenue 100' E/O Valley View Avenue 40
126 Foothill Drive Del Rosa Avenue Arden Avenue 40
127 G Street 6th Street 140' North Of 29th Street 35
128 G Street 150' South Of 30th Street Marshall Boulevard 35 129 Gilbert Street Waterman Avenue 207' E/O Cedar Avenue 35 130 Golden Avenue Highland Avenue Lynwood Drive 40
131 H Street 6th Street Marshall Blvd 35
132 Hallmark Pkwy University Pkwy Lexington Pkwy 50
133 Highland Avenue Sierra Way Valencia Avenue 40
134 Highland Avenue Valencia Avenue Arden Avenue 40
135 Industrial Pkwy Lexington Pkwy Palm Avenue 50
136 Inland Center Drive E Street 1570' Sw/O I Street 40 137 K Street Mill Street Rialto Avenue 35
138 Marshall Blvd Little Mountain Drive Ladera Road 35
139 Meridian Avenue Randall Avenue Mill Street 40
140 Meridian Avenue Rialto Avenue Foothill Blvd 40
141 Mill Street Bordwell Avenue Waterman Avenue 40
Packet Page. 922
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

36 Table 2- Summary of 14-Year Extension Recommendations ID Street From To Speed Limit
142 Miramonte Avenue 23rd Street Marshall Blvd 35
143 Mountain Avenue 39th Street 40th Street 35
144 Northpark Boulevard University Parkway Little Mountain Drive 40 145 Northpark Boulevard Little Mountain Drive Electric Avenue 40 146 Perris Hill Park Road Pacific Street 21st Street 40 147 Redlands Boulevard Hunts Lane Gardena Street 40
148 Redlands Boulevard Gardena Street East City Limits 45 149 San Bernardino Avenue Tippecanoe Avenue Mt. View Avenue 45 150 Sierra Way Mill Street Rialto Avenue 40
151 Sierra Way 30th Street 40th Street 35
152 Sierra Way 40th Street 48th Street 40
153 Sterling Avenue Highland Avenue Pumalo Street 40
154 Tippecanoe Avenue 9th Street Baseline Street 45
155 Waterman Avenue Central Avenue Rialto Avenue 45
156 Waterman Avenue Rialto Avenue Highland Avenue 40
157 Waterman Avenue Highland Avenue 30th Street 40

Packet Page. 923
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

NP = No Posted Speed Limit Sign
PL = Post Speed Limit Sign

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

37 Table 3 - Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes The following table identifies segments that have recommended changes to the posted speed limit. All segments identified in this table are eligible to have a 14-year extension applied in 2032 because a full E&TS has been previously performed.

Table 3 – Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes ID Street From To Existing New Change
1 2nd St Mt. Vernon Ave Waterman Ave 35 30 -5
3 3rd St Waterman Ave Lena Rd 45 40 -5
4 3rd St Lena Rd Leland Norton Way 45 40 -5
5 3rd St Leland Norton Way Victoria Ave NP 50 PL
6 5th St H St Sierra Way NP 35 PL
7 5th St Sierra Way Pedley Rd 40 35 -5
8 6th St Del Rosa Dr 200' E/O Victoria
Ave
40 35 -5
9 16th St University Pkwy Medical Center Dr NP 35 PL
10 21st St Waterman Ave Perris Hill Park Rd 35 30 -5
13 Arden Ave Pacific St Highland Ave 40 35 -5
14 Arrowhead Ave Highland Ave Kendall Dr 35 30 -5
15 Auto Center Dr Showcase Dr S E St NP 35 PL
16 Baseline St Meridian Ave California St 55 45 -10
18 Baseline St H St Sierra Way NP 35 PL
19 Cajon Blvd California St 23rd St 55 50 -5
20 California St Baseline St Cajon Blvd 40 30 -10
21 Campus Pkwy Kendall Dr Devils Canyon Rd NP 45 PL
22 Central Ave 100' E/O Valley View
Ave/Lena Rd
Mountain View Ave 45 40 -5
23 Commercial Rd Hunts Ln Waterman Ave NP 40 PL
25 D St 6th St 28th St 45 35 -10
26 Del Rosa Dr 6th St Baseline St 45 30 -15
27 Del Rosa Ave Del Rosa Dr Marshall Blvd 40 30 -10
28 Del Rosa Ave Marshall Blvd 39th St 45 35 -10
30 E St Century Ave Mill St 40 35 -5
31 E St Mill St Rialto Ave NP 30 PL
36 E St 30th St Kendall Dr 40 35 -5
37 Electric Ave Mountain View Ave Northpark Blvd 40/35 30 PL 38 Eucalyptus Ave Mill St Rialto Ave 35 30 -5
39 G St Inland Center Dr Mill St NP 35 PL
Packet Page. 924
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

N
P = No Posted Speed Limit Sign
PL = Post Speed Limit Sign

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

38 Table 3 – Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes ID Street From To Existing New Change
40 G St Mill St 3rd St/4th St 40 30 -10
41 H St 3rd St 6Th St NP 30 PL
42 Harrison St 35th St 40th St NP 45 PL
43 Highland Ave West Boundary
(~2664' West Of Macy
St)
Macy St NP 50 PL
44 Highland Ave Macy St Medical Center Dr NP 35 PL
45 Highland Ave Medical Center Dr Muscupiabe Ave 35/40 35 PL 46 Highland Ave Muscupiabe Ave E St 35 30 -5
47 Highland Ave E St Sierra Way 35 30 -5
48 Highland Ave Arden Ave Victoria Ave NP 30 PL
49 Highland Ave Victoria Ave Bradford Ave NP 35 PL
50 Hill Dr Magnolia Dr H St 35 30 -5
51 Hospitality Ln E St Waterman Ave 35 30 -5
52 Hospitality Ln Waterman Ave Tippecanoe Ave 35 30 -5
53 Hunts Ln Washington St Commercial Rd 40 35 -5
54 Hunts Ln Commercial Rd Hospitality Ln NP 35 PL
55 Kendall Dr E St 40th St 45 35 -10
56 Kendall Dr 40th St University Pkwy 50 40 -10
57 Kendall Dr University Pkwy Palm Ave 50 45 -5
58 Lena Rd Orange Show Rd Central Ave NP 35 PL
59 Lena Rd Mill St 3rd St NP 35 PL
61 Little Mountain
Dr
Edgehill Rd 1300' S/O Sheridan
Rd
45 40 -5
62 Little Mountain
Dr
1300' S/O Sheridan Rd Northpark Blvd 45 40 -5
63 Lynwood Dr Valencia Ave Del Rosa Ave 40 35 -5
65 Marshall Blvd Ladera Rd Waterman Ave 35 30 -5
66 Massachusetts
Ave
Baseline St Highland Ave 35 30 -5
67 Medical Center
Dr
5th St Baseline St 35 30 -5
68 Medical Center
Dr
Baseline St Cajon Blvd 40 35 -5
69 Mill St Eucalyptus Ave Macy St NP 40 PL
70 Mill St Waterman Ave Tippecanoe Ave 45 40 -5
71 Morgan Rd Melbourne Rd Yardley St 35 30 -5
72 Mt. Vernon Ave Grant Ave Rialto Ave 40 30 -10
Packet Page. 925
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

NP = No Posted Speed Limit Sign
PL = Post Speed Limit Sign

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

39 Table 3 – Street Segments with Recommended Speed Changes ID Street From To Existing New Change
73 Mt. Vernon Ave Rialto Ave 7th St NP 30 PL
74 Mt. Vernon Ave 7th St 21st St 35 30 -5
76 Mt. View Ave Victoria St Highland Ave 40 30 -10
77 Mt. View Ave Highland Ave Electric Ave 40 30 -10
78 Mt. View Ave Electric Ave Hill Dr/Pinehurst Ct 35 30 -5 79 N. Little League
Dr
600' S/O W Little
League Dr
O'Rourke Ave 25 30 +5
80 Ohio Ave Magnolia Ave Pine Ave NP 35 PL
81 Orange Show Rd E St Arrowhead Ave 40 35 -5
82 Orange Show Rd Arrowhead Ave Tippecanoe Ave 50 45 -5 85 Palm Ave Kendall Dr Belmont Ave 45 40 -5
87 Palm Ave (East) Atlantic Ave Piedmont Dr 35 30 -5
88 Parkdale Dr Mountain View Ave Valencia Ave NP 30 PL
89 Pepper Ave Randall Ave Mill St 45 40 -5
90 Pepper Ave Mill St Madrona St 45 35 -10
91 Piedmont Dr Yuma Dr Orange St NP 35 PL
92 Pine Ave Kendall Dr Belmont Ave 50 45 -5
93 Rialto Ave Eucalyptus Ave Mt. Vernon Ave 45 35 -10
96 Rialto Ave Sierra Way Waterman Ave NP 35 PL
97 Rialto Ave Waterman Ave Lena Rd NP 35 PL
99 Sierra Way 5th St 30th St 40 35 -5
100 State St University Pkwy Sheridan Rd NP 30 PL
101 Tippecanoe Ave Harriman Pl San Bernardino Ave 40 35 -5 102 Tippecanoe Ave San Bernardino Ave 3Rd St 40/45 40 PL 103 University Pkwy Highland Ave Baseline St NP 30 PL
104 University Pkwy Cajon Blvd Northpark Blvd 50 40 -10 105 Valencia Ave 21st St 30th St 40 35 -5
106 Valencia Ave 30th St 40th St 45 40 -5
108 W. Little League
Dr
N. Little League Dr Palm Ave NP 35 PL
109 Waterman Ave Barton Rd Central Ave 50 40 -10
Packet Page. 926
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

40 Table 4 – Street Segments Maintaining the Posted Speed Limit The following table identifies segments that have no recommended changes to the posted speed limit.

The last column in the table identifying if the 14-year extension has been applied in this survey is for the City to reference in the future to determine if a 14-year extension can be applied. A 14-year extension can only be applied one time, so segments with the extension applied will have to be certified with an E&TS in 7 years (2032).

Table 4 - Street Segments Maintaining Posted Speed Limit ID Street From To
Speed
Limit
14-Year
Extension
Applied in
this Survey
2 3rd Street Sierra Way Waterman Street 40 No
11 28th Street H Street Waterman Avenue 25 No
12 40th Street Waterman Avenue Golden Avenue 45 No
17 Baseline Street California Street Medical Center Drive 40 No 24 Commercial Road Waterman Avenue Steele Road 25 No
29 E Street Hunts Ln Century Avenue 40 No
32 E Street Rialto Avenue 8th Street 30 No
33 E Street 8th Street Baseline Street 35 No
34 E Street Baseline Street Highland Avenue 35 No
35 E Street Highland Avenue 30th Street 35 No
60 Little Mountain Drive 27th Street Edgehill Road 45 No 64 Macy Street Highland Avenue North City Limits 35 No
75 Mt. Vernon Avenue 21St Street 27th Street 35 No
83 Orange Street Pacific Street Highland Avenue 35 No
84 Orange Street Highland Avenue Piedmont Drive 35 No
86 Palm Avenue Belmont Avenue Melvin Avenue 25 No
94 Rialto Avenue Mt Vernon Avenue G Street 35 No
95 Rialto Avenue G Street Sierra Way 35 No
98 Rialto Avenue Lena Road Tippecanoe Avenue 25 No
110 9th Street Medical Center Drive H Street 40 Yes
111 9th Street H Street Sierra Way 40 Yes
112 9th Street Sierra Way Waterman Avenue 40 Yes
113 9th Street Waterman Avenue 600' E/O Preston Street 45 Yes 114 27th Street Mt. Vernon Avenue G Street 35 Yes
115 30th Street Little Mountain Drive Valencia Avenue 45 Yes Packet Page. 927
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

41 Table 4 - Street Segments Maintaining Posted Speed Limit ID Street From To
Speed
Limit
14-Year
Extension
Applied in
this Survey
116 40th Street Kendall Drive Electric Avenue 45 Yes
117 40th Street Electric Avenue Waterman Avenue 40 Yes
118 40th Street Golden Avenue Mountain Avenue 40 Yes
119 48th Street Kendall Drive Electric Avenue 35 Yes
120 Arrowhead Avenue Esparanza Street Rialto Avenue 40 Yes 121 Arrowhead Avenue 7th Street Highland Avenue 35 Yes
122 Atlantic Avenue Palm Avenue Cienega Court 35 Yes
123 Baseline Street Medical Center Drive H Street 40 Yes 124 Baseline Street Sierra Way Del Rosa Avenue 40 Yes
125 Central Avenue Arrowhead Avenue 100' E/O Valley View Avenue 40 Yes
126 Foothill Drive Del Rosa Avenue Arden Avenue 40 Yes
127 G Street 6th Street 140' North Of 29th Street 35 Yes 128 G Street 150' South Of 30th Street Marshall Boulevard 35 Yes 129 Gilbert Street Waterman Avenue 207' E/O Cedar Avenue 35 Yes 130 Golden Avenue Highland Avenue Lynwood Drive 40 Yes
131 H Street 6th Street Marshall Blvd 35 Yes
132 Hallmark Pkwy University Pkwy Lexington Pkwy 50 Yes 133 Highland Avenue Sierra Way Valencia Avenue 40 Yes
134 Highland Avenue Valencia Avenue Arden Avenue 40 Yes 135 Industrial Pkwy Lexington Pkwy Palm Avenue 50 Yes
136 Inland Center Drive E Street 1570' Sw/O I Street 40 Yes 137 K Street Mill Street Rialto Avenue 35 Yes
138 Marshall Blvd Little Mountain Drive Ladera Road 35 Yes 139 Meridian Avenue Randall Avenue Mill Street 40 Yes
140 Meridian Avenue Rialto Avenue Foothill Blvd 40 Yes
141 Mill Street Bordwell Avenue Waterman Avenue 40 Yes
142 Miramonte Avenue 23rd Street Marshall Blvd 35 Yes
143 Mountain Avenue 39th Street 40th Street 35 Yes
144 Northpark Boulevard University Parkway Little Mountain Drive 40 Yes 145 Northpark Boulevard Little Mountain Drive Electric Avenue 40 Yes 146 Perris Hill Park Road Pacific Street 21st Street 40 Yes Packet Page. 928
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

42 Table 4 - Street Segments Maintaining Posted Speed Limit ID Street From To
Speed
Limit
14-Year
Extension
Applied in
this Survey
147 Redlands Boulevard Hunts Lane Gardena Street 40 Yes 148 Redlands Boulevard Gardena Street East City Limits 45 Yes 149 San Bernardino Avenue Tippecanoe Avenue Mt. View Avenue 45 Yes 150 Sierra Way Mill Street Rialto Avenue 40 Yes
151 Sierra Way 30th Street 40th Street 35 Yes
152 Sierra Way 40th Street 48th Street 40 Yes
153 Sterling Avenue Highland Avenue Pumalo Street 40 Yes 154 Tippecanoe Avenue 9th Street Baseline Street 45 Yes 155 Waterman Avenue Central Avenue Rialto Avenue 45 Yes 156 Waterman Avenue Rialto Avenue Highland Avenue 40 Yes 157 Waterman Avenue Highland Avenue 30th Street 40 Yes

Packet Page. 929
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

43 Segments with Special Conditions
This section is meant to further explain the use of special conditions to lower the recommended speed limit lower than the 85th Percentile speed. These special conditions include the following:
▪ Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
▪ Safety Corridors
▪ Land or Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Pedestrians ▪ Retain Adopted or Immediately Prior Speed Limits
Conditions Not Readily Apparent to Motorists
The following segments surveyed had recommended speed limits that were 5 miles per hour (mph) or more above or below the 85th percentile speed due to conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Each segment is discussed below.

Segment 7 – 5th Street – Sierra Way to Pedley Road
This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 10,915 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, commercial, a school, and a park along the

1.00-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to hidden driveways, uncontrolled crosswalk, and sidewalk gaps that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended to remain in place per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.

Segment 9 – 16th Street – University Parkway to Medical Center Drive This segment currently has no posted speed limit and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 5,451 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.74-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to moderate pedestrian use and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason.

Segment 11 – 28th Street – H Street to Waterman Avenue
This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,232 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and a school along the 1.26-mile-long segment.

The 85th percentile speed is 31 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to moderate pedestrian use and uncontrolled crosswalk that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended to remain in place per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.

Packet Page. 930
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

44 Segment 12 – 40th Street – Waterman Avenue to Golden Avenue This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has one to two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 8,040 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and park along the 1.00-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 52 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to moderate pedestrian use and uncontrolled crosswalk that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 45 mph for the above reason.

Segment 21 – Campus Parkway – Kendall Drive to Devils Canyon Road This segment currently has no posted speed limit and has two through lanes in each direction, a raised median, and a bike lane with an ADT of 3,881 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the

0.71-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 52 mph and would normally justify a 50 mph posted speed limit. However, due to moderate pedestrian use that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 45 mph for the above reason.

Segment 24 – Commercial Road – Waterman Avenue to Steele Road This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 2,326 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is industrial and residential along the 0.25-mile-long segment.

The 85th percentile speed is 32 mph and would normally justify a 30 mph posted speed limit. However, due to moderate pedestrian use that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason.

Segment 37 – Electric Avenue – Mountain View Avenue to Northpark Boulevard This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and 40 mph and has one through lane in each direction and a bike lane with an ADT of 9,112 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and school along the

0.99-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 41 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to residential density and uncontrolled crosswalk that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended to remain in place per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.

Segment 52 – Hospitality Lane – Waterman Avenue to Tippecanoe Avenue This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has two through lanes in each direction, a raised median, and a bus lane with an ADT of 8,916 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is commercial along the

1.11-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to a high collision rate that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason.

Packet Page. 931
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

45 Segment 53 – Hunts Lane – Washington Street to Commercial Road This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 10,528 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.52-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to uncontrolled crosswalk that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent.

This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed.

Segment 59 – Lena Road – Mill Street to 3rd Street
This segment currently has no posted speed limit and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 3,546 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and industrial along the 0.87-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to high crash history that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed.

Segment 76 – Mountain View Avenue – Victoria Street to Highland Avenue This segment is currently posted at 40 mph and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 3,921 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, commercial, and school along the 1.71-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 42 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to high crash history that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended to remain in place per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.

Segment 78 – Mountain View Avenue – Electric Avenue to Hill Drive/Pinehurst Court This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 4,541 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 1.29-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 36 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to residential density and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason.

Packet Page. 932
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

46 Segment 79 – North Little League Drive – 600’ South of West Little League Drive to O’Rourke Avenue This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,013 vehicles per day. The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to uncontrolled crosswalks and hidden driveways that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. Additionally, the adjacent land includes North Vermont Elementary School, the Little League Western Region Complex, residential, and entrance to hiking and mountain biking trails. This land use meets the land use requirements to establish a land or facility that generates high concentrations of pedestrians and bicyclists. Therefore, a 10 mph reduction can be implemented. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason.

This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended to remain in place per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.

Segment 84 – Orange Street – Highland Avenue to Piedmont Drive This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 4,533 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and fire station along the 0.53-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 43 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit by rounding down using the California MUTCD Option 2. Since the 2016 E&T Survey, this segment has not added any additional through lanes and the speed limit was properly set by an E&T Survey. This segment was identified by the City to apply Section 22358.8 of the California Vehicle Code to retain the existing speed limit from the 2016 E&TS to keep the speed limit posted at 35 mph. See table 1 for more discussion and application
Segment 87 – Palm Avenue (East) – Atlantic Avenue to Piedmont Drive This segment is currently posted at 35 mph and has one to two through lanes in each direction and a bike lane with an ADT of 7,901 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and commercial along the 0.65-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 35 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to uncontrolled crosswalk that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended to remain in place per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.

Segment 90 – Pepper Avenue – Mill Street to Madrona Street This segment is currently posted at 45 mph and has one to two through lane in each direction with an ADT of 18,682 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential, commercial, and school along the 1.71- mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 46 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit. However, due to moderate pedestrian use and uncontrolled crosswalk that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed. In addition, 25 mph school zones are recommended to remain in place per Section 22352 of the California Vehicle Code.

Packet Page. 933
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

47 Segment 97 – Rialto Avenue – Waterman Avenue to Lena Road This segment currently has no posted speed limit and has two through lanes in each direction with an ADT of 5,881 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential and commercial along the 0.62-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 45 mph and would normally justify a 45 mph posted speed limit.

However, due to high crash history that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 35 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed.

Segment 98 – Rialto Avenue – Lena Road to Tippecanoe Avenue This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 4,061 vehicles per day. The adjacent land is residential along the 0.46-mile-long segment. The 85th percentile speed is 37 mph and would normally justify a 35 mph posted speed limit. However, due to residential density that may not be apparent to unfamiliar drivers, a lower speed limit is prudent. This segment has as a safety corridor and an additional 5 mph reduction can be applied. It is recommended that the speed limit remain posted at 25 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed.

Additional 5 mph Speed Reductions
Using CVC Section 22358.7, if a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour if the portion of the highway has been designated as a safety corridor or a land or facility that generates high concentrations of pedestrians.

Safety Corridors
The Safety Corridor Analysis identified 114 roadway segments to be established as Safety Corridors. The recommendations set forth using this section meet the following required thresholds:

1. Safety Corridor cannot Exceed 1/5 of the total roadway network.

The total roadway network in the City of San Bernardino is 616.4 miles, establishing a maximum safety corridor network length of 123.28 miles. The established safety corridor network includes 120.6 miles of roadway, which is within the 1/5 total roadway network threshold.

2. Safety Corridors will include at least 25% of Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes In the last 5 years, there have been 218 fatal and severe injury crashes in the City, establishing a minimum of 55 crashes that should be included in the City’s safety corridors. The established safety corridor network includes 93 crashes which is within the threshold.

Among the 114 roadway segments identified as safety corridors, 71 roadway segments used the additional 5 mph speed reduction when establishing the recommended speed limit. 114 segments are listed in Table 5 and identify if the recommendation used an additional 5 mph reduction using the safety corridor designation in establishing the speed limit.

Table 5- Segments Identified as Safety Corridors
Packet Page. 934
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

48 Table 5 – Segments Identified as Safety Corridors
ID Street Segment
Additional
Reduction
Applied
1 2nd Street Mt. Vernon Ave to Waterman Ave Yes
3 3rd Street Waterman Ave to Lena Rd Yes
4 3rd Street Lena Rd to Leland Norton Way No
5 3rd Street Leland Norton Way to Victoria Ave Yes
6 5th Street H St to Sierra Way Yes
7 5th Street Sierra Way to Pedley Rd Yes
8 6th Street Del Rosa Dr to 200' E/O Victoria Ave No
10 21st Street Waterman Ave to Perris Hill Park Rd Yes
11 28th Street H St to Waterman Ave No
13 Arden Avenue Pacific St to Highland Ave Yes
14 Arrowhead Ave Highland Ave to Kendall Dr Yes
15 Auto Center Drive Showcase Dr S to E St No
16 Baseline Street Meridian Ave to California St Yes
18 Baseline Street H St to Sierra Way No
19 Cajon Boulevard California St to 23rd St Yes
20 California Street Baseline St to Cajon Blvd No
22 Central Avenue 100' E/O Valley View Ave to Mountain View Ave Yes 25 D Street 6th St to 28th St Yes
26 Del Rosa Avenue 6th St to Baseline St Yes
27 Del Rosa Avenue Del Rosa Dr to Marshall Blvd Yes
28 Del Rosa Avenue Marshall Blvd to 39th St Yes
30 E Street Century Ave to Mill St Yes
31 E Street Mill St to Rialto Ave Yes
32 E Street Rialto Ave to 8th St Yes
33 E Street 8th St to Baseline St Yes
34 E Street Baseline St to Highland Ave Yes
35 E Street Highland Ave 30th St Yes
36 E Street 30th St to Kendall Dr Yes
37 Electric Ave Mountain View Ave to Northpark Blvd Yes 38 Eucalyptus Ave Mill St to Rialto Ave Yes
40 G Street Mill St to 3rd St Yes
41 H Street 3rd St to 6th St Yes
43 Highland Avenue West Boundary (~2664' West of Macy St) to Macy St Yes 44 Highland Avenue Macy St to Medical Center Dr Yes
45 Highland Avenue Medical Center Dr to Muscupiabe Ave Yes 46 Highland Avenue Muscupiabe Ave to E St Yes
47 Highland Avenue E St to Sierra Way No
Packet Page. 935
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

49 Table 5 – Segments Identified as Safety Corridors
ID Street Segment
Additional
Reduction
Applied
48 Highland Avenue Arden Ave to Victoria Ave Yes
49 Highland Avenue Victoria Ave to Bradford Ave Yes
51 Hospitality Ln E St To Waterman Ave Yes
53 Hunts Lane Washington St to Commercial Rd Yes
55 Kendall Drive E St to 40th St Yes
56 Kendall Drive 40th St to University Pkwy Yes
57 Kendall Drive University Pkwy to Palm Ave Yes
58 Lena Road Orange Show Rd to Central Ave Yes
59 Lena Road Mill St to 3rd St Yes
60 Little Mountain Drive 27th St to Edgehill Rd Yes
61 Little Mountain Drive Edgehill Rd to 1300' S/O Sheridan Rd Yes 62 Little Mountain Drive 1300' S/O Sheridan Rd to Northpark Blvd Yes 63 Lynwood Drive Valencia Ave to Del Rosa Ave Yes
64 Macy Street Highland Ave to North City Limits Yes
65 Marshall Boulevard Ladera Rd to Waterman Ave Yes
66 Massachusetts Ave Baseline St to Highland Ave Yes
67 Medical Center Drive 5th St to Baseline St Yes
68 Medical Center Drive Baseline St to Cajon Blvd Yes
69 Mill Street Eucalyptus Ave to Macy St Yes
70 Mill Street Waterman Ave to Tippecanoe Ave Yes
71 Morgan Road Melbourne Rd to Yardley St Yes
72 Mt. Vernon Avenue Rialto Ave to 7th St Yes
73 Mt. Vernon Avenue Grant Ave to Rialto Ave No
74 Mt. Vernon Avenue 7th St to 21st St Yes
76 Mt. View Avenue Victoria St to Highland Ave Yes
77 Mt. View Avenue Highland Ave to Electric Ave Yes
81 Orange Show Road E St to Arrowhead Ave No
86 Palm Avenue Belmont Ave to Melvin Ave Yes
88 Parkdale Drive Mountain View Ave to Valencia Ave Yes 89 Pepper Avenue Randall Dr to Mill St Yes
90 Pepper Avenue Mill St to North City Limits Yes
93 Rialto Avenue Eucalyptus Ave to Mt. Vernon Ave Yes
94 Rialto Avenue Mt. Vernon Ave to G St Yes
95 Rialto Avenue G St to Sierra Way No
96 Rialto Avenue Sierra Way to Waterman St No
97 Rialto Avenue Waterman St to Lena Rd Yes
98 Rialto Avenue Lena Rd to Tippecanoe Ave Yes
Packet Page. 936
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

50 Table 5 – Segments Identified as Safety Corridors
ID Street Segment
Additional
Reduction
Applied
99 Sierra Way 5th St to 30th St Yes
100 State Street University Pkwy to Sheridan Rd No
101 Tippecanoe Avenue Harriman Pl to San Bernardino Ave Yes 102 Tippecanoe Avenue San Bernardino Ave to 3rd St Yes
103 University Parkway Highland Ave to Baseline St Yes
104 University Parkway Cajon Blvd to Northpark Blvd Yes 105 Valencia Avenue 21st St to 30th St Yes
106 Valencia Avenue 30th St to 40th St Yes
108 W. Little League Drive N. Little League Dr to Palm Ave Yes 109 Waterman Avenue Barton Rd to Central Ave No
110 9Th St Medical Center Dr To H St No
111 9Th St H St To Sierra Way No
112 9Th St Sierra Way To Waterman Ave No
113 9Th St Waterman Ave To 600' E/O Preston St No
115 30Th St Little Mountain Dr To Valencia Ave No
116 40Th St Kendall Dr To Electric Ave No
117 40Th St Electric Ave To Waterman Ave No
121 Arrowhead Ave 7Th St To Highland Ave No
123 Baseline St Medical Center Dr To H St No
124 Baseline St Sierra Way To Del Rosa Ave No
126 Foothill Dr Del Rosa Ave To Arden Ave No
127 G St 6Th St To 140' North Of 29Th St No
130 Golden Ave Highland Ave To Lynwood Dr No
132 Hallmark Pkwy University Pkwy To Lexington Pkwy No
133 Highland Ave Sierra Way To Valencia Ave No
134 Highland Ave Valencia Ave To Arden Ave No
136 Inland Center Dr E St To 1570' Sw/O I St No
137 K St Mill St To Rialto Ave No
139 Meridian Ave Randall Ave To Mill St No
141 Mill St Bordwell Ave To Waterman Ave No
143 Mountain Ave 39Th St To 40Th St No
146 Perris Hill Park Rd Pacific St To 21St St No
147 Redlands Blvd Hunts Ln To Gardena St No
148 Redlands Blvd Gardena St To East City Limits No
149 San Bernardino Ave Tippecanoe Ave To Mt. View Ave No 150 Sierra Way Mill St To Rialto Ave No
151 Sierra Way 30Th St To 40Th St No
Packet Page. 937
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

51 Table 5 – Segments Identified as Safety Corridors
ID Street Segment
Additional
Reduction
Applied
155 Waterman Ave Central Ave To Rialto Ave No
156 Waterman Ave Rialto Ave To Highland Ave No
157 Waterman Ave Highland Ave To 30Th St No

Packet Page. 938
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

52 Land or Facilities that Generate High Concentrations of Pedestrians The following segment surveyed had a recommended speed limit that added an additional 5 miles per hour (mph) reduction due to conditions that define the segment as a Land or Facility that Generates High Concentrations of Bicyclists or Pedestrians.

Segment 79 – North Little League Drive – 600’ South of West Little League Drive to O’Rourke Avenue This segment is currently posted at 25 mph and has one through lane in each direction with an ADT of 3,013 vehicles per day. The 85th percentile speed is 40 mph and would normally justify a 40 mph posted speed limit. However, due to due to uncontrolled crosswalks and hidden driveways, a lower speed limit is prudent. Additionally, the adjacent land includes North Vermont Elementary School, the Little League Western Region Complex, residential, and entrance to hiking and mountain biking trails. This land use meets the land use requirements to establish a land or facility that generates high concentrations of pedestrians and bicyclists. Therefore, a 10 mph reduction can be implemented. It is recommended that the speed limit be posted at 30 mph for the above reason. This recommendation falls within the limitations requiring the recommendation be no more than 12mph under the 85th percentile speed.

Packet Page. 939
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

53 Retain Currently Adopted or Restore Immediately Prior Speed Limit Application Using CVC Section 22358.8, a new section added due to AB 43, after completing an E&T Survey, the City can choose to keep the currently adopted speed limits or use the immediately prior adopted speed limit.

This decision is made by the City after an Engineering and Traffic Survey has been completed and is applicable if each of the following three conditions are met:

1. The agency identifies that the posted speed limit is reasonable or safe

2. An Engineer has verified that no general purpose lanes have been added

3. The speed limit was established with an Engineering and Traffic Survey The recommendations set forth using this section are considered separate from the E&TS Recommendations. After the E&TS recommendations have been made, City staff and an Engineer may decide that the posted speed limit is appropriate and can retain currently adopted or restore immediately prior speed limits set by previous E&T Surveys. Segments using CVC Section 22358.8 for the recommended speed limit are identified in Table 6. The E&T Recommendation is identified as the “Initial Recommendation” and the City’s recommendation applying CVC Section 22358.8 is identified as the “Final Recommended Speed.”
When the 2025 adopted E&TS expires after 7 years, a new E&TS will be prepared to recertify the speed limits. For segments in the 2025 E&TS that applied CVC Section 22358.8 shown in Table 6, and the City wishes to use the previous E&T recommendation using 22358.8 as justification to maintain the speed limits in the future, the “Initial Recommendation” identified in Table 6 shall be the E&T Recommended Speed Limit that should be referenced as the previous speed limit established by an E&T Survey. Table 6’s “Final Recommended Speed” shall not be referred as the speed limit recommendation established using an E&TS for the purpose of using CVC Section 22358.8 to maintain the currently adopted speed limit when the speed limits are recertified in 2031 or 2038.

Table 6- Street Segments Using AB 43 via CVC Section 22358.8 ID Segment
Prev.

E&T
Speed
Rec.

Year
of
Prev.

E&T
2024
85%
Speed
Init.

Rec.

Initial
Justification
CVC
22358.8
Criteria CVC
22358.8
Applied
Final
Rec.

Speed 1 2 3
84 Orange St from Highland
Ave to Piedmont Dr 35 2016 43 40
California
MUTCD
Option 2
X X X Yes 35

CVC 22358.8 Criteria

1. The agency identifies that the posted speed limit is reasonable or safe

2. An Engineer has verified that no general purpose lanes have been added

3. The speed limit was established with an Engineering and Traffic Survey

Packet Page. 940
2025 Engineering and Traffic Survey Report

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO

APPENDIX A
Street Segment Data

Packet Page. 941
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 1Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/13/2024
Time of Speed Survey 10:59 AM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.17
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 2.01
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 21,431
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Allen
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 2nd St
FROM Mt. Vernon Ave TO Waterman Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair-Poor
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 35 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Mt Vernon, Metrolink, L, I, I-215 N&S, G, F, E, D, Arrowhead, Sierra, Waterman; Stop @ K
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 942
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 2Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/13/2024
Time of Speed Survey 11:41 AM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.36
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park, National Guard, Fire Station Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,969
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 3rd St
FROM Sierra Way TO Waterman St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair-Poor
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sierra, Waterman
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 943
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 3Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:38 PM
85th Percentile Speed 47
50th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.27
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.61
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 74
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,018
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Ida
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 3rd St
FROM Waterman Ave TO Lena Rd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Lena, Waterman
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 944
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 4Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:18 PM
85th Percentile Speed 44
50th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.22
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.14
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 70
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 21,490
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 3rd St
FROM Lena Rd TO Leland Norton Way
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Leland Norton, Del Rosa , Tippecanoe, Lena %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 945
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 5Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:49 PM
85th Percentile Speed 56
50th Percentile Speed 49
10 mph Pace 42-51
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.40 Crash Rate 0.16
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.26
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways South Side Only
Width 72
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 50
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 13,994
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 3rd St
FROM Leland Norton Way TO Victoria Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting South Side E/O Leonard
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Victoria, Hanger, Leonard, Sterling, Leland Norton %
Total 2
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 12.1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 946
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 6Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:06 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.51
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.89
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 24,164
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 5th St
FROM H St TO Sierra Way
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sierra, Mt. View, Arrowhead, D, E, F, G, H %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 947
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 7Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/23/2024
Time of Speed Survey 3:59 PM
85th Percentile Speed 46
50th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.24 Crash Rate 0.17
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Partial Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Commercial, Park Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Hidden Driveways, Uncontrolled Crosswalk, Sidewalk Gaps & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,915
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL W/O Waterman, 2 Lanes E/O Waterman Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Pedley
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 5th St
FROM Sierra Way TO Pedley Rd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sierra, Waterman
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 9
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 948
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 8Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/23/2024
Time of Speed Survey 3:25 PM
85th Percentile Speed 43
50th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.618 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Partial, Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.42
Sidewalks Partial Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 32
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Residential
Field Study By NS Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,705
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/17/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 6th St
FROM Del Rosa Dr TO 200' E/O Victoria Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Poor
Lighting Partial South Side
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Del Rosa, Stop @ Sterling
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 949
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 9Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/13/2024
Time of Speed Survey 3:12 PM
85th Percentile Speed 41
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 74
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.45
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.74
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Hidden Driveways, Moderate Pedestrian Use
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,451
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/20/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 16th St
FROM University Pkwy TO Medical Center Dr
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ University, California; TS @ Medical Center %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 950
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 10Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/22/2024
Time of Speed Survey 1:16 PM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.36
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.55
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Hospital, Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9,233
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Kenwood
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 21st St
FROM Waterman Ave TO Perris Hill Park Rd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 35 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Waterman, Valencia
%
Total 1
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 23.8
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 951
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 11Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/22/2024
Time of Speed Survey 3:25 PM
85th Percentile Speed 31
50th Percentile Speed 27
10 mph Pace 22-31
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 79
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.32
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.26
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Moderate Pedestrian Use, Uncontrolled Crosswalk
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,232
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Wall, Belle
Date of ADT 8/15/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 28th St
FROM H St TO Waterman Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ E; Stop @ Arrowhead, Mt. View, Sierra Way; Stop @ H %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 952
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 12Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/20/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:17 PM
85th Percentile Speed 52
50th Percentile Speed 47
10 mph Pace 41-50
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.91
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Partial S/S, None N/S
Driveways Both Sides
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Uncontrolled Crosswalk, Moderate Pedestrian Use
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,040
Number of Lanes 2-4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Golden
Date of ADT 11/9/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET 40th St
FROM Waterman Ave TO Golden Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 45 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Waterman ; Stop @ Valencia %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 953
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 13Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/16/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:18 PM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.54
On-Street Parking West Side
Length of Segment 0.49
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Park, School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,427
Number of Lanes 3 Lanes + TWLTL + Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/7/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Arden Ave
FROM Pacific St TO Highland Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Pacific, 20Th, I-210, Highland %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2.5
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 954
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 14Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/21/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:39 PM
85th Percentile Speed 39
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 1.27
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.73
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,916
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes + Bike Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/2/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Arrowhead Ave
FROM Highland Ave TO Kendall Dr
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair- Dwys
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Highland, 26Th, 30Th, Marshall ; Stop @ 34Th, Thompson, D, 28Th
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 1
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 7.35
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 955
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 15Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:40 PM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 83
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.31
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.49
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 74
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,988
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/24/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Auto Center Dr
FROM Showcase Dr S TO E St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Modreate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ E, I-215
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 956
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 16Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2024
Time of Speed Survey 12:48PM
85th Percentile Speed 52
50th Percentile Speed 47
10 mph Pace 43-52
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 55
Total Crashes 10
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.4 Crash Rate 0.79
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks None
Driveways Both Sides
Width 72
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Vacant
Field Study By NS Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,583
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/26/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Baseline St
FROM Meridian Ave TO California St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Partial Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 55 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Meridian, University, California %
Total 4
Speed Related 1
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 23.0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 957
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 17Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2024
Time of Speed Survey 12:23PM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.4 Crash Rate 0.36
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.47
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Commercial
Field Study By NS Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 16,155
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/26/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Baseline St
FROM California St TO Medical Center Dr
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve No
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 45 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ California, Medical Center %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 958
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 18Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:37 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 87
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 19
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.58
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.89
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, School
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 33,735
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/26/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Baseline St
FROM H St TO Sierra Way
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ H, G, F, E, D, Arrowhead, Mt. View, Sierra %
Total 2
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 2
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 18.2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 959
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 19Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/8/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:53 PM
85th Percentile Speed 59
50th Percentile Speed 52
10 mph Pace 50-59
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 52
Posted Speed Limit 55
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.65 Crash Rate 0.05
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.40
Sidewalks None
Driveways None
Width 24
Adjacent Land Use Railroad, Vacant, Industrial, Warehouses Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 50
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 13,011
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/20/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Cajon Blvd
FROM California St TO 23rd St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control None
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2.21
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 960
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 20Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/8/2024
Time of Speed Survey 12:59 PM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 30
10 mph Pace 26-35
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 92
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.40
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 2.15
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 44
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School(No Sign), Park, Vacant, Industrial Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,380
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 19Th, 27Th
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET California St
FROM Baseline St TO Cajon Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Fair- Dwys
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Baseline, Highland ; Stop @ Magnolia, 16Th, 20Th, Cajon %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2.46
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 961
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 21Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:33 PM
85th Percentile Speed 52
50th Percentile Speed 45
10 mph Pace 41-50
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 58
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.71
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways None
Width 80
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Moderate Pedestrian Use
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,881
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Bike Lane + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/9/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Campus Pkwy
FROM Kendall Dr TO Devils Canyon Rd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting On Raised Median
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Kendall; Stop @ Devils Canyon %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 962
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 22Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/22/2024
Time of Speed Survey 11:35 AM
85th Percentile Speed 49
50th Percentile Speed 42
10 mph Pace 39-48
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 51
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.10
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.56
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Vacant
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,548
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/20/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Central Ave
FROM 100' E/O Valley View Ave/Lena Rd TO Mountain View Ave CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Tippecanoe; Stop @ Mountain %
Total 2
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 1
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 10.9
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 963
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 23Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/22/2024
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 33-42
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.55
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 137
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,326
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/20/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Commercial Rd
FROM Hunts Ln TO Waterman Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Waterman Stop @ Hunts
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 964
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 24Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 9/12/2024
Time of Speed Survey 10:08AM
85th Percentile Speed 32
50th Percentile Speed 25
10 mph Pace 23-32
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 56
Posted Speed Limit 25
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.25
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 38
Adjacent Land Use Industrial, Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 25
Moderate Pedestrian Use
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,333
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 9/18/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Commercial Rd
FROM Waterman Ave TO Steele Rd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve No
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Waterman; Stop @ Steele
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 965
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 25Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/23/2024
Time of Speed Survey 9:00 AM
85th Percentile Speed 41
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 59
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.86
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 2.22
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, Police Department, Cemetery, Vaca Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,881
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET D St
FROM 6th St TO 28th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 45 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 6Th, 9Th, Baseline, Highland ; Stop @ 13Th, 16Th, 28Th %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 5.15
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 966
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 26Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/16/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:54 PM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 73
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.15
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.76
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use School, Residential, Vacant
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,817
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/27/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Del Rosa Dr
FROM 6th St TO Baseline St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 6, 9, Baseline
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 3.31
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 967
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 27Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/20/2024
Time of Speed Survey 10:40 AM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 81
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 18
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.63
On-Street Parking West Side N/O I-210
Length of Segment 1.18
Sidewalks West Side N/O I-210
Driveways Both Sides
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Residential, Fire Station Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 22,096
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/7/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Del Rosa Ave
FROM Del Rosa Dr TO Marshall Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Del Rosa, Highland, Pumalo, Date, I-210, Lynwood; Stop @ Marshall
%
Total 2
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 2
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 13.8
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 968
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 28Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/20/2024
Time of Speed Survey 11:11 AM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.18
On-Street Parking West Side
Length of Segment 0.81
Sidewalks West Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 50
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Vacant, Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,146
Number of Lanes 2-3 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/7/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Del Rosa Ave
FROM Marshall Blvd TO 39th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Fair-Poor
Lighting West Side
2016 ET Speed Limit 45 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ Eureka, Marshall
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 969
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 29Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/22/2024
Time of Speed Survey 11:06 AM
85th Percentile Speed 43
50th Percentile Speed 38
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.07
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 72
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Business
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 12,712
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + 2 Bus Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM Hunts Ln TO Century Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Hunts, Hospitality, Fairway, Century %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 970
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 30Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:10 PM
85th Percentile Speed 41
50th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 9
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.55
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.15
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 82
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Business
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 13,024
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Raised Median + 2 Bus Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM Century Ave TO Mill St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @Mill, N/S Mall, Orange, Chandler, Century, National Orange Show Event Center
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 971
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 31Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 2:33 PM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.57
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.59
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Railroad, Park
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,152
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes + Raised Median + 2 Bus Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM Mill St TO Rialto Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Modertae
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Rialto, Valley, Mill, Railroad Xing %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 14.3
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 972
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 32Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:43 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limit 30
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.48
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.89
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Library, Vacant
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,380
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes + Raised Median + Bus Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM Rialto Ave TO 8th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 8th, 6th, 5th, 4th, 2nd, Rialto %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 973
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 33Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:50 PM
85th Percentile Speed 41
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 76
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.62
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 58
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,896
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes + 2 Bus Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM 8th St TO Baseline St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Baseline, 10th, 9th, 8th
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 974
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 34Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:02 PM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.91
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 52
Adjacent Land Use School, Residential, Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,042
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 19th, 20th
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM Baseline St TO Highland Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Highland, 18th, 13th, Baseline %
Total 2
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 11
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 975
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 35Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/9/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:35 AM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.21
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.69
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use School, Residential, Cemetary
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 6,299
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 25th
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM Highland Ave TO 30th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sids
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 30th, 28th, Highland
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 976
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 36Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/21/2024
Time of Speed Survey 1:19 PM
85th Percentile Speed 43
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 61
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 13
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.69
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.78
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 21,997
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 33Rd, 35Th
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET E St
FROM 30th St TO Kendall Dr
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 30Th, Marshall, 34Th
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 3.28
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 977
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 37Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/21/2024
Time of Speed Survey 3:43 PM
85th Percentile Speed 41
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit 40/
Total Crashes 1
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.10
On-Street Parking West Side Only
Length of Segment 0.99
Sidewalks Both Sides, Partial East Side
Driveways West Side Only
Width 34
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School, Vacant
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Residential Density, Uncontrolled Crosswalk & Safety Corridor mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9,112
Number of Lanes 2 + Bike Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 50Th
Date of ADT 8/15/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Electric Ave
FROM Mountain View Ave TO Northpark Blvd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 40Th; Stop @ 48Th
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 978
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 38Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/13/2024
Time of Speed Survey 9:02 AM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.48
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.50
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,580
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/26/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Eucalyptus Ave
FROM Mill St TO Rialto Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 40 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Mill ; Stop @ Rialto
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 979
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 39Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:52 AM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 71
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.22
Sidewalks None
Driveways None
Width 56
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 169
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,126
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes + Bike Lane + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET G St
FROM Inland Center Dr TO Mill St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Mill, Inland
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 980
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 40Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:59 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.54
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.94
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Railroad, Commercial, Industrial, Vacant Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 5,436
Number of Lanes 3-4 Lanes + Bike Lane + Raised Median/ TWLTL Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET G St
FROM Mill St TO 3rd St/4th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 3rd, Shopping Center, 2nd, Rialto, Mill %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 2.5
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 981
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 41Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 3:26 PM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.62
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.35
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 58
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,404
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ 4th
Date of ADT 10/19/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET H St
FROM 3rd St TO 6Th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 6th, 5th, 3rd
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 8.21
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 982
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 42Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/20/2024
Time of Speed Survey 12:43 PM
85th Percentile Speed 47
50th Percentile Speed 41
10 mph Pace 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.24 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.72
Sidewalks East Side Only
Driveways East Side Only
Width 40
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Vacant
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,550
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/15/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Harrison St
FROM 35th St TO 40th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting East Side Only
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ 40Th
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 983
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 43Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/8/2024
Time of Speed Survey 10:50 AM
85th Percentile Speed 55
50th Percentile Speed 49
10 mph Pace 44-53
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 65
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.40 Crash Rate 0.48
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.51
Sidewalks None
Driveways None
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 50
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,144
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/15/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Highland Ave
FROM West Boundary (~2664' West Of Macy St) TO Macy St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting None
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Macy
%
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 5.42
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 984
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 44Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 10:43 AM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.40
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.98
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 18,805
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Macy St TO Medical Center Dr
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Medical, California, State %
Total 4
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 4
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 31.0
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 985
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 45Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:20 AM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 30-39
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 75
Posted Speed Limit 35/
Total Crashes 5
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.33
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.84
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 16,597
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Medical Center Dr TO Muscupiabe Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Muscupiabe, Mt. Vernon, Medical, I-215 %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 3.88
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 986
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 46Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 11:44 AM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 77
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 7
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.37
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.77
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Commercial, School, Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 22,373
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Muscupiabe Ave TO E St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Poor
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ E, G, H, CA-259, Lincoln, Muscupiabe %
Total 2
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 20.6
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 987
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 47Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:08 PM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 30
10 mph Pace 25-34
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 80
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 6
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.51
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.51
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 21,209
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Highland Ave
FROM E St TO Sierra Way
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Heavy
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Poor
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Sierra, Mt. View, Arrowhead, E, D %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 1
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 35.8
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 988
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 48Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 12:39 PM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 28-37
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.47
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.49
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 74
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commericial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 43,750
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Arden Ave TO Victoria Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Victoria, Arden, I-210 East %
Total 3
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 3
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 45.3
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 989
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 49Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/31/2023
Time of Speed Survey 1:00 PM
85th Percentile Speed 40
50th Percentile Speed 35
10 mph Pace 31-40
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 72
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 8
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.26
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.21
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 75
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial, School, Vacant Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 23,622
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/1/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Highland Ave
FROM Victoria Ave TO Bradford Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Palm, Orange, Central, Victoria, REAL Journey %
Total 1
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 1
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations YES
Safety Factor per mile 15.5
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 990
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 50Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/21/2024
Time of Speed Survey 11:09 AM
85th Percentile Speed 34
50th Percentile Speed 30
10 mph Pace 25-34
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.68 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.62
Sidewalks North Side
Driveways Both Sides
Width 52
Adjacent Land Use Residential, School
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 165
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,921
Number of Lanes 2 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Magnolia, 4Th
Date of ADT 11/14/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Hill Dr
FROM Magnolia Dr TO H St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 35 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control Stop @ H
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community NO
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 991
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 51Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 10/25/2024
Time of Speed Survey 9:10AM
85th Percentile Speed 38
50th Percentile Speed 34
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 69
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 2
Statewide Average Crash Rate 1.23 Crash Rate 0.26
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.83
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 70
Adjacent Land Use University, Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,447
Number of Lanes 4+Bus Lane+Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/22/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Hospitality Ln
FROM E St TO Waterman Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ E, Hunts, Hospitality, Waterman %
Total 0
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 9.43
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 992
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 52Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/9/2024
Time of Speed Survey 10:14 AM
85th Percentile Speed 36
50th Percentile Speed 32
10 mph Pace 27-36
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85
Posted Speed Limit 35
Total Crashes 12
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 1.11
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.11
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 84
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 30
High Collision Rate
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,916
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Raised Median + Bus Lane
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/24/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Hospitality Ln
FROM Waterman Ave TO Tippecanoe Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Waterman, Carnegie, Shopping Centers, Harriman, Tippecanoe %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 993
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 53Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/9/2024
Time of Speed Survey 9:03 AM
85th Percentile Speed 45
50th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace 34-43
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 68
Posted Speed Limit 40
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.52
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways None
Width 64
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Uncontrolled Crosswalk & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10,528
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/24/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Hunts Ln
FROM Washington St TO Commercial Rd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Washington, Cooley
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 994
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 54Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 11/13/2023
Time of Speed Survey 9:09 AM
85th Percentile Speed 37
50th Percentile Speed 33
10 mph Pace 29-38
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 85
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.94 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.52
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 60
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 18,030
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Raised Median
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 10/24/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Hunts Ln
FROM Commercial Rd TO Hospitality Ln
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Hospitality, E, Redlands, Oliver Holmes %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 1
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 995
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 55Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/12/2024
Time of Speed Survey 3:08 PM
85th Percentile Speed 41
50th Percentile Speed 36
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 66
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 11
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.88
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 1.00
Sidewalks Partial Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 54
Adjacent Land Use Commercial
Field Study By AC Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 11,391
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 11/9/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Kendall Dr
FROM E St TO 40th St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Limited Ssd
Roadway Conditions Fair
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 45 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ H, F, 40Th
%
Total 3
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 12
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 996
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 56Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/12/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:45 PM
85th Percentile Speed 49
50th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace 41-50
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 67
Posted Speed Limit 50
Total Crashes 9
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.30
On-Street Parking South Side
Length of Segment 1.64
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 74
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 40
California MUTCD Option 2 & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 16,498
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Bike Lane + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks @ Lakewood
Date of ADT 11/9/2023
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Kendall Dr
FROM 40th St TO University Pkwy
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Moderate
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 50 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 40Th, Little Mountain, University %
Total 5
Speed Related 0
DUI 1
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 3
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone NO
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 16.6
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 997
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 57Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/12/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:25 PM
85th Percentile Speed 50
50th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace 39-48
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 62
Posted Speed Limit 50
Total Crashes 14
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.32
On-Street Parking East Side Only
Length of Segment 2.00
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 72
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Commercial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 20,225
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + Bike Lane + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/15/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Kendall Dr
FROM University Pkwy TO Palm Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Light
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve None
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 50 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ University, Campus, Pine, Shopping Center, Cambridge, Wagonwheel, Palm
%
Total 2
Speed Related 1
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 1
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 11.5
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 998
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 58Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/9/2024
Time of Speed Survey 12:35 PM
85th Percentile Speed 42
50th Percentile Speed 37
10 mph Pace 32-41
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 70
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 0
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.00
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.42
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 170
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,212
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/20/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Lena Rd
FROM Orange Show Rd TO Central Ave
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve None
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Good
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Central; Stop @ Orange, Norman %
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 999
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 59Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/9/2024
Time of Speed Survey 2:42 PM
85th Percentile Speed 46
50th Percentile Speed 39
10 mph Pace 35-44
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 53
Posted Speed Limit NP
Total Crashes 4
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 1.18
On-Street Parking None
Length of Segment 0.87
Sidewalks South Side Only
Driveways Both Sides
Width 58
Adjacent Land Use Residential, Industrial
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 35
High Crash History & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,546
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/20/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Lena Rd
FROM Mill St TO 3rd St
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit N/A mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ 3rd, Mill; Stop @ Rialto
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 1000
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 60Segment

CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Date of Speed Survey 8/12/2024
Time of Speed Survey 11:08 AM
85th Percentile Speed 52
50th Percentile Speed 44
10 mph Pace 38-47
Percentage of Vehicles in Pace 60
Posted Speed Limit 45
Total Crashes 3
Statewide Average Crash Rate 0.96 Crash Rate 0.29
On-Street Parking Both Sides
Length of Segment 0.96
Sidewalks Both Sides
Driveways Both Sides
Width 62
Adjacent Land Use Residential
Field Study By LA Checked By NS

OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
mph
mph

CRASH HISTORY AND SAFETY CORRIDOR

ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
CERTIFICATION: I, Nicolle Spann, do hereby certify that this Engineering and Traffic Survey within the City of San Bernardino was performed under my supervision and is accurate and complete. I am duly registered in the State of California as a Professional Engineer (Traffic).

Nicolle Spann Date
crashes/MVM
feet
miles
Speed Limit 45
Closest to 85th Speed & Safety Corridor
mph
Justification
mph
crashes/MVM
3/25/2025

RECOMMENDATION
mph
Number of Survey Samples 200
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9,859
Number of Lanes 4 Lanes + TWLTL
Marked Uncontrolled X-Walks None
Date of ADT 8/15/2024
4/1/2021-3/31/2024Date Range
STREET Little Mountain Dr
FROM 27th St TO Edgehill Rd
CERTIFICATION DATE 3/25/2025
Pedestrian Traffic Light
Truck Traffic Moderate
Vertical Curve Yes
Horizontal Curve Yes
Visibility Fair
Roadway Conditions Good
Lighting Both Sides
2016 ET Speed Limit 45 mph
State Registration Number
TR 2933
This Segment is a Designated Safety Corridor
Type of Traffic Control TS @ Edgehill, 27Th
%
Total 0
Speed Related 0
DUI 0
During School Hours 0
Pedestrian and Bicycle 0
Disadvantaged Community YES
School Zone YES
Vulnerable Populations NO
Safety Factor per mile 2
Fatal and Severe Injury Crashes
Packet Page. 1001
2025 ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY 61Segment