Agenda packet — San Carlos City Council, January 26, 2026 (part 6 of 8)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1274

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1275
Project Name: Organization:

Project Location: Performed By:

Scenario Description: Date:

Analysis Year: Checked By:

Analysis Period: Date:

ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting
Office 249 219 30
Retail 219 131 88
Restaurant 44 22 22
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0
Residential 522 188 334
Hotel 46 26 20
All Other Land Uses2 0 0 0
1,080 586 494
Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
All Other Land Uses2
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 8 5 0 0
Retail 9 11 4 0
Restaurant 7 3 1 1
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 7 3 4 0
Hotel 7 3 1 0
Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips All Person-Trips 1,080 586 494 Office 14% 43%
Internal Capture Percentage 14% 13% 15% Retail 13% 27%
Restaurant 95% 55%
External Vehicle-Trips5 932 512 420 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential 3% 4%
External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel 4% 55%
San Carlos, CA
AM Street Peak Hour
W-Trans
NMS
2045
7/1/2024
KBJ
Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 Table 5-A: Computations Summary Table 6-A: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-A. 1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual , published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 6Person-Trips
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ). 4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-A vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be made to Tables 5-A, 9-A (O and D). Enter transit, non-motorized percentages that will result with proposed mixed-use project complete.

Table 2-A: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Table 4-A: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Destination (To) Origin (From)
Origin (From) Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips
Table 3-A: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
Table 1-A: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment
Development Data (For Information Only )
0 0
0 Estimated Vehicle-Trips3
Land Use
SCA037

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1276
Project Name:

Analysis Period:

Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Office 1.00 219 219 1.00 30 30
Retail 1.00 131 131 1.00 88 88
Restaurant 1.00 22 22 1.00 22 22
Cinema/Entertainment 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Residential 1.00 188 188 1.00 334 334
Hotel 1.00 26 26 1.00 20 20
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 8 19 0 0
Retail 26 11 12 0
Restaurant 7 3 1 1
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 7 3 67 0
Hotel 15 3 2 0
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 42 5 0 0
Retail 9 11 4 0
Restaurant 31 10 9 1
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 7 22 4 0
Hotel 7 5 1 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 30 189 219 189 0 0
Retail 17 114 131 114 0 0
Restaurant 21 1 22 1 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 5 183 188 183 0 0
Hotel 1 25 26 25 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 13 17 30 17 0 0
Retail 24 64 88 64 0 0
Restaurant 12 10 22 10 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 14 320 334 320 0 0
Hotel 11 9 20 9 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Land Use Table 7-A (D): Entering Trips
2Person-Trips
Person-Trip Estimates
SCA037
AM Street Peak Hour
Table 9-A (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Table 8-A (O): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Origin (From) Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Table 7-A: Conversion of Vehicle-Trip Ends to Person-Trip Ends Table 7-A (O): Exiting Trips
0 0
0 Table 8-A (D): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Origin (From)
Origin Land Use Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode* External Trips by Mode*
1Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-A 0 *Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number. 0 0
0 0
0 Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
0 3Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator Destination Land Use
Table 9-A (O): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1277
Project Name: Organization:

Project Location: Performed By:

Scenario Description: Date:

Analysis Year: Checked By:

Analysis Period: Date:

ITE LUCs1 Quantity Units Total Entering Exiting
Office 236 40 196
Retail 612 306 306
Restaurant 471 316 155
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0
Residential 473 307 166
Hotel 59 30 29
All Other Land Uses2 0 0 0
1,851 999 852
Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Veh. Occ.4 % Transit % Non-Motorized Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
All Other Land Uses2
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office
Retail
Restaurant
Cinema/Entertainment
Residential
Hotel
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 24 6 4 0
Retail 6 89 80 5
Restaurant 5 64 28 11
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 7 31 35 4
Hotel 0 5 16 0
Total Entering Exiting Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips All Person-Trips 1,851 999 852 Office 45% 17%
Internal Capture Percentage 45% 42% 49% Retail 41% 59%
Restaurant 46% 70%
External Vehicle-Trips5 1,011 579 432 Cinema/Entertainment N/A N/A External Transit-Trips6 0 0 0 Residential 36% 46%
External Non-Motorized Trips6 0 0 0 Hotel 67% 72%
1Land Use Codes (LUCs) from Trip Generation Manual , published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator. 3Enter trips assuming no transit or non-motorized trips (as assumed in ITE Trip Generation Manual ). 5Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P.

Table 5-P: Computations Summary Table 6-P: Internal Trip Capture Percentages by Land Use 4Enter vehicle occupancy assumed in Table 1-P vehicle trips. If vehicle occupancy changes for proposed mixed-use project, manual adjustments must be made 6Person-Trips
0 0
0 0
Table 4-P: Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix* Origin (From) Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
0 Table 3-P: Average Land Use Interchange Distances (Feet Walking Distance) Origin (From) Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool
SCA037 W-Trans
San Carlos, CA NMS
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

Estimation Tool Developed by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute - Version 2013.1 KBJ
1-Jul
2045
PM Street Peak Hour
Table 1-P: Base Vehicle-Trip Generation Estimates (Single-Use Site Estimate) Land Use Development Data (For Information Only ) Estimated Vehicle-Trips3 Table 2-P: Mode Split and Vehicle Occupancy Estimates
Land Use Entering Trips Exiting Trips

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1278
Project Name:

Analysis Period:

Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Veh. Occ. Vehicle-Trips Person-Trips* Office 1.00 40 40 1.00 196 196
Retail 1.00 306 306 1.00 306 306
Restaurant 1.00 316 316 1.00 155 155
Cinema/Entertainment 1.00 0 0 1.00 0 0
Residential 1.00 307 307 1.00 166 166
Hotel 1.00 30 30 1.00 29 29
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 39 8 4 0
Retail 6 89 80 15
Restaurant 5 64 28 11
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 7 70 35 5
Hotel 0 5 20 1
Office Retail Restaurant Residential Hotel
Office 24 6 12 0
Retail 12 92 141 5
Restaurant 12 153 49 21
Cinema/Entertainment 2 12 9 12 0
Residential 23 31 44 4
Hotel 0 6 16 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 18 22 40 22 0 0
Retail 124 182 306 182 0 0
Restaurant 146 170 316 170 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 112 195 307 195 0 0
Hotel 20 10 30 10 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Internal External Total Vehicles1 Transit2 Non-Motorized2 Office 34 162 196 162 0 0
Retail 180 126 306 126 0 0
Restaurant 108 47 155 47 0 0
Cinema/Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0
Residential 77 89 166 89 0 0
Hotel 21 8 29 8 0 0
All Other Land Uses3 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
12 0
0 3Total estimate for all other land uses at mixed-use development site is not subject to internal trip capture computations in this estimator Table 9-P (O): Internal and External Trips Summary (Exiting Trips) Origin Land Use Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode* Person-Trip Estimates External Trips by Mode*
0 Table 8-P (D): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Destination) Origin (From)
2Person-Trips
0 0
Table 9-P (D): Internal and External Trips Summary (Entering Trips) Destination Land Use
*Indicates computation that has been rounded to the nearest whole number.

SCA037
PM Street Peak Hour
Table 7-P: Conversion of Vehicle-Trip Ends to Person-Trip Ends Land Use Table 7-P (D): Entering Trips Table 7-P (O): Exiting Trips Table 8-P (O): Internal Person-Trip Origin-Destination Matrix (Computed at Origin) Origin (From) Destination (To)
Destination (To)
Cinema/Entertainment
Cinema/Entertainment
0 12
1Vehicle-trips computed using the mode split and vehicle occupancy values provided in Table 2-P

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1279
F
Draft Downtown San Carlos Traffic Operations Study
October 2025
Appendix F
Traffic Signal Warrant Spreadsheets

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1280

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1281
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

4.18 Condition A2 Met
323 vph
Condition A3 Met
1070 vph
Condition B Met
Elm St & Holly St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 1
Major Street Minor Street
Elm St Holly St

N-S E-W
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
AM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1282
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

5.74 Condition A2 Met
483 vph
Condition A3 Met
1005 vph
Condition B Met
Elm St & Holly St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 1
Major Street Minor Street
Elm St Holly St

N-S E-W
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
PM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1283
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

4.18 Condition A2 Met
323 vph
Condition A3 Met
1070 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
AM Peak Future with SC + ECR
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Elm St Holly St

N-S E-W
Elm St & Holly St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 1
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1284
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

5.74 Condition A2 Met
483 vph
Condition A3 Met
1005 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
PM Peak Future with SC + ECR
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Elm St Holly St

N-S E-W
Elm St & Holly St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 1
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1285
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met No Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

1.19 Condition A2 Met
196 vph
Condition A3 Met
1166 vph
Condition B Not Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
AM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Holly St Walnut St

E-W N-S
Holly St & Walnut St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 2
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1286
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met No Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

0.83 Condition A2 Met
190 vph
Condition A3 Met
1013 vph
Condition B Not Met
Holly St & Walnut St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 2
Major Street Minor Street
Holly St Walnut St

E-W N-S
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
PM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1287
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met
0 Condition A2 Met
249 vph
Condition A3 Met
1392 vph
Condition B Met
Holly St & Walnut St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 2
Major Street Minor Street
Holly St Walnut St

E-W N-S
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
AM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1288
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met
0 Condition A2 Met
248 vph
Condition A3 Met
1280 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
PM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Holly St Walnut St

E-W N-S
Holly St & Walnut St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 2
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1289
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

E-W N-S
Holly St & Walnut St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 2
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1290
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

E-W N-S
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
25 25
PM Peak Future with SC + ECR
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1291
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

1.54 Condition A2 Met
158 vph
Condition A3 Met
3255 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
AM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Olive Street

N-S E-W
El Camino Real & Olive Street Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 18
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1292
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

1.42 Condition A2 Met
158 vph
Condition A3 Met
3255 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
PM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Olive Street

N-S E-W
El Camino Real & Olive Street Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 18
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1293
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

1.74 Condition A2 Met
178 vph
Condition A3 Met
2898 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
AM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Olive Street

N-S E-W
El Camino Real & Olive Street Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 18
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1294
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

1.42 Condition A2 Met
158 vph
Condition A3 Met
3255 vph
Condition B Met
El Camino Real & Olive Street Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 18
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Olive Street

N-S E-W
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
PM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1295
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met No Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

3.7 Condition A2 Not Met
41 vph
Condition A3 Met
1684 vph
Condition B Not Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
AM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Morse Boulevard

N-S E-W
El Camino Real & Morse Boulevard Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 26
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1296
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

55.5 Condition A2 Met
124 vph
Condition A3 Met
3217 vph
Condition B Met
El Camino Real & Morse Boulevard Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo Count
Intersection: 1
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Morse Boulevard

N-S E-W
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
PM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1297
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

9.39 Condition A2 Met
104 vph
Condition A3 Met
2796 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
AM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Morse Boulevard

N-S E-W
El Camino Real & Morse Boulevard Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 26
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1298
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

55.5 Condition A2 Met
124 vph
Condition A3 Met
3217 vph
Condition B Met
El Camino Real & Morse Boulevard Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 26
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Morse Boulevard

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1299
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

9.39 Condition A2 Met
104 vph
Condition A3 Met
2796 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
AM Peak Future with SCR + ECR
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
El Camino Real Morse Boulevard

N-S E-W
El Camino Real & Morse Boulevard Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 26
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1300
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Met Condition A1 Met

N-S E-W
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 2 1
35 25
PM Peak Future with SCR + ECR
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1301
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met No Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

0.54 Condition A2 Met
149 vph
Condition A3 Met
1372 vph
Condition B Not Met
Brittan Ave & Elm St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 27
Major Street Minor Street
Brittan Ave Elm St

E-W N-S
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
30 25
AM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1302
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

0.6 Condition A2 Met
148 vph
Condition A3 Met
1626 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
30 25
PM Peak Future
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Brittan Ave Elm St

E-W N-S
Brittan Ave & Elm St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 27
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1303
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met No Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

0.54 Condition A2 Met
149 vph
Condition A3 Met
1372 vph
Condition B Not Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
30 25
AM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Brittan Ave Elm St

E-W N-S
Brittan Ave & Elm St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 27
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1304
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

0.6 Condition A2 Met
148 vph
Condition A3 Met
1626 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
30 25
PM Peak Future with San Carlos Road Diet
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Brittan Ave Elm St

E-W N-S
Brittan Ave & Elm St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 27
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1305
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met No Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

0.54 Condition A2 Met
149 vph
Condition A3 Met
1372 vph
Condition B Not Met
Brittan Ave & Elm St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 27
Major Street Minor Street
Brittan Ave Elm St

E-W N-S
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
30 25
AM Peak Future with SCR + ECR
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1306
Warrant 3: Peak-Hour Volumes and Delay
Street Name
Direction
Number of Lanes
Approach Speed
Population less than 10,000? No
Date of Count:

Scenario:

Warrant 3 Met?: Met when either Condition A or B is met Yes Condition A: Met when conditions A1, A2, and A3 are met Not Met Condition A1 Not Met

0.6 Condition A2 Met
148 vph
Condition A3 Met
1626 vph
Condition B Met
Minor Approach Volume:

The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 800 vph for intersections with four or more appraches or 650 vph for intersections with three approaches
Total Entering Volume:

The plotted point falls above the curve
The volume on the same minor street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vph for one moving lane of traffic of 150 vph for two moving lanes 1 1
30 25
PM Peak Future with SCR + ECR
The total delay experienced by traffic on one minor street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds four vehicle-hours for a one lane approach, or five vehicle-hours for a two-lane approach
Minor Approach Delay: vehicle-hours
Tuesday, April 25, 2023
Major Street Minor Street
Brittan Ave Elm St

E-W N-S
Brittan Ave & Elm St Project Name: SCA037
San Mateo County
Intersection: 27
0 100
200
300
400
500
600
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800

MINOR STREET
―HIGHER VOLUME

APPROACH (VPH)
MAJOR STREET―TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES

VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH)
Warrant 3, Peak Hour
2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES
2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE
1 LANE & 1 LANE
10/23/2024 Signal Warrant Analysis

MEMORANDUM
To: Grace Le and Steven Machida (City of San Carlos)
From: Robert Stevens, Mike Vidra, and Josh Woelbing (CSWST2) CC: Poonam Narkar, Jim Stickley, and Rohit Tak (WRT)
Date: March 25, 2024
Subject: San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan – Infrastructure Analysis and Existing Conditions Assessment Based upon our conversation on Friday March 22, 2024, we have developed this memorandum that summarizes our understanding of the existing studies completed to date, tasks necessary to refine infrastructure upgrades associated with the Specific Plan, and recommended services to expedite development of the streetscape. We understand the focus of the Specific Plan and Streetscape Study Area is as shown in the following figure.

Specific Plan and Streetscape Key Study Area

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1308
A memorandum prepared by RRM Design Group dated November 14, 2022, summarizes the existing public utilities within the Study Area, which include:

Owner Service Basis of Understanding
City of San Carlos Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains GIS and Master Plan Documents California Water Service Water Service Service Area Maps Pacific Gas and Electric Electrical and Natural Gas Service Area Maps Comcast Telecommunications Service Area Maps
AT&T Telecommunications Service Area Maps
Sonic Telecommunications Not within area but is servicing the City The memorandum summarizes the existing utility systems with the Study Area; important elements for our evaluation include:
• Potable Water. California Water Service requests information related to the increase in demand as soon as possible for them to evaluate their system. The report does not indicate the age or condition of the pipelines.
• Wastewater. The report notes that all sanitary sewer pipelines should be upsized to at least 8 inches in diameter. Other lines may need to be upsized to accommodate future conditions. The figure below originates from the City’s GIS data. In general, 6 and 8 inch in diameter VCP pipelines on Laurel Street drain either northwest or south east towards collector sewers located on the crossing roadways or alleys.

The RRM memorandum notes that a wastewater system study completed in 2012 found groundwater and stormwater intrusion into the sanitary sewer system. Thus, the Specific Plan should evaluate the sewer system’s capacity to accommodate additional growth while accounting for wet weather flows. The 2012 study did not evaluate all lines within the Specific Plan area. Those areas modelled are the dark blue lines in the following figure. The light blue lines are typically those pipelines, which are less than 12 inches in diameter.

Existing City Sanitary Sewer System along Laurel Street

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1309
The 2012 wastewater report
recommends upgrades to the
collection system within the Specific
Plan Area on Arroyo and Brittan
Avenues. Based upon the existing
conditions, the 6 and 8 inch pipelines
could be upsized to 8 and 10 inch
pipes respectively along their existing
alignment using a pipe bursting
technique.

We did not see any records of a video
inspection of the conditions of the
wastewater pipelines and manholes.

We recommend completing an
assessment in accordance with the NASSCO standards.
• Stormwater. The report does note that a portion of the Specific Plan area is located within FMEA designated flood Zones AO and AE near Pulgas Creek. The memorandum is unclear regarding the need to upsize storm drains within the study area. It notes the following:

Existing underground storm drainpipes measure 12-inches, 15-inches, and 18-inches in diameter and locally, 24- to 27- inches in diameter. Typically, an 18-inch diameter is the minimum size needed for low flowage conditions. As such, even under small rain events or other water-related events such as utility breaks or a fire hydrant flush, it can be expected that the volume of water will exceed the capacity of the system.

It is unclear as to us why an 18-inch in diameter pipeline cannot convey low flows. However, the City of San Carlos did complete a storm drain system masterplan in 2017 that indicates upgrades to several pipelines within the Study Area as shown in the following figure. 2012 Wastewater Analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1310
2017 Storm Drain Master Plan Pipeline Upgrades with Study Area

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1311
Book B of Maps at Page 19 recorded in 1888 established the property lines within the core of the Study Area. A subdivision of the blocks illustrates in Book 8 of Maps pages 25 and 26 recorded on October 7, 1912, serves as the basis property descriptions of many of the parcels. Final Map 2016-01 as shown in Book 140 Page 93 for the development of the Residences at Wheeler Plaza resolved the right of way along San Carlos Avenue and the 600 block of Laurel Street. Another map resolved a portion of the right of way on Laurel Street’s 700 block. The maps show that Laurel Street has a right-of-way width of 60 feet. An excerpt of these maps is shown in the following figures.

It appears that some of the alleys and parking areas east of Laurel Street were recorded on the 1912 map. After reviewing property deeds, the areas were expanded through dedications to the City of San Carlos likely during development. We found few recorded records of survey, parcel maps, or other recorded documents besides those noted above within the Study Area, meaning establishing the right of way will likely require resolution and filing of Records of Survey with San Mateo County.

A portion of the September 4, 1888, Book B of Maps at Page 19 illustrating original property lines along Laurel Street

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1312
A portion of 1912 Parcel Map that subdivided parcels and is the basis for many properties within the Study Area.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1313
Excerpts from Final Map 2016-01 Book 140 Page 93 that illustrate the right of way along the 600 block of Laurel Street and San Carlos Avenue.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1314
Excerpt from the 777 Walnut Creek Condominiums Final Map shown in Book 140 page 61 of maps illustrating partial resolution of the 700 block Laurel Street’s right of way.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1315
Our proposed support of the Specific Plan included coordinating with public utilities serving the Study Area to determine capacity deficiencies should additional development occur. As we had anticipated there may not be models created for the area, we have planned on completing a qualitative assessment and working with the utility providers to understand needs. This information would support development of recommendations for pipeline and system upgrades as well as costs.

We understand that there likely is the need to upgrade numerous underground systems in coordination with the surface improvements. Understanding the needs, phasing, and costs will be critical to ensuring streetscape improvements are budgeted property and can be quickly implemented. Thus, we would recommend the following tasks be completed for those areas to receive streetscape improvements as shown in the sketch below.

1. Acquire topographic data using area photogrammetry techniques based on NAVD88 and NAD 83. We would acquire an orthorectified photograph within the boundary show. Within the detailed area, we would create topography that illustrates the locations of buildings, sidewalks, streets, and tree canopies. We would supplement this data with some field surveying to collect the building faces at key locations as canopies may obscure their locations. Should future project seek to advance, the data collected could be extended.

2. Confirm the right of way of Laurel Street’s 600 and 700 blocks per the recorded final maps. Resolve the right of way along 800 block of Laurel Street. File a Record of Survey with San Mateo County for this resolution.

Assessment of Existing Conditions within Streetscape and Specific Plan Study Area

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1316

3. Acquire as-built records of all utility systems and plot their location on the topographic map. Confirm the locations of utility infrastructure by Underground Service Alert markings as well as the location of surface appurtenances within the detail study area.

4. Measure the rim and invert of storm drain and sanitary sewer infrastructure within the detail study area.

5. Complete video inspection of the wastewater and storm drain pipelines, manholes, and inlets within the entire Specific Plan area to document current conditions.

Once the streetscape’s location and phasing are formally defined, the City could initiate collection of design level topographic data of surface elevations and site features. Depending upon the final surface of the street, we may suggest using a high definition scan of the corridor. Finally, we recommend identifying utilities within the project area by ground penetrating radar and potholing.

If I can provide any additional information, please contact me at 415.533.1864 or [email protected].

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1317
bae urban economics
San Francisco Sacramento Los Angeles Washington DC Atlanta New York City www.bae1.com
Memorandum

To: James Stickley, Principal, WRT
cc: Poonam Narkar, Principal, WRT
From: David Shiver, Principal
Olivia El-Sadr Davis, Associate
Date: May 23, 2025
REVISED October 29, 2025
Re: San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan Fiscal Impact Analysis This memorandum presents the findings from a Fiscal Impact Analysis (“FIA”) of the potential new growth associated with the proposed City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan (“Proposed Project”) at full 2045 buildout. According to buildout projections prepared by WRT, the potential new growth associated with full buildout of the Proposed Project includes approximately 1,650 new residential units and approximately 420,000 square feet of new nonresidential space (including office and general commercial space, restaurants, and 160 hotel rooms). The FIA estimates the fiscal impacts associated with buildout of this development potential anticipated under the proposed Downtown Specific Plan by year 2045, using existing development built on the ground as the baseline condition.

The FIA estimates the annual revenue and expenditure impacts of the Proposed Project on the City of San Carlos’ General Fund. The analysis uses the City’s 2024/25 Adopted Budget Update and other sources as cited in this report to evaluate existing City revenues and service costs and estimate the revenue and service costs associated with the Proposed Project. The annual fiscal impacts from the Project are presented in constant 2025 dollars.

Summary of Findings
• Buildout of the Downtown Specific Plan will have a positive net fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund. As shown in the table below, this analysis estimates that the Proposed Project would generate annual General Fund revenues totaling approximately $4.5 million and annual General Fund expenditures totaling approximately $3.8 million, resulting in an annual fiscal surplus of approximately $641,000. In addition to these annual recurring fiscal impacts, the Proposed Project would generate additional one-time revenues to the City from various development impact fees paid by new developments.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1318
2 • In the near term, implementing the proposed street master plan improvements and enhanced Laurel Street programming will likely require upfront public expenditures before new development occurs to help fund them. These early investments can be viewed as catalytic public commitments that attract private capital and help realize the plan’s envisioned development potential.

Summary of Annual Net Fiscal Impact to the City of San Carlos General Fund at Full Buildout
Sources: BAE, 2025.

Assumptions and Methodology This section summarizes the projected ongoing annual fiscal impacts from the Proposed Project and the underlying methodologies and assumptions used to estimate fiscal impacts.

Attachment A provides the detailed set of tables summarizing the results of the analysis.

Development Program
• Tables 1, 2, and 3 provide an overview of the proposed development program and assumptions related to new employment and residential service populations attributable to new development associated with the Proposed Project at full 2045 buildout. This development includes residential use, as well as office and general commercial space, restaurants, and 160 hotel rooms.

General Fund Revenue Estimates
• Table 4 summarizes the assumptions related to the projected assessed value of new development associated with the Proposed Project.
• Table 5 presents the projected net change in total assessed value from the Proposed Project at full buildout, based on the assumptions in Table 4. The FIA estimates the Proposed
General Fund Revenues Project
Property Tax $1,943,000
ILVLF $339,000
Sales Tax $415,000
Transient Occupancy Tax $1,120,000
Other Revenues $657,000
Net Change in General Fund Revenues $4,474,000
General Fund Expenditures
General Government $112,000
Community Development $421,000
Parks & Recreation $248,000
Public Safety $2,415,000
Public Works $637,000
Net Change in General Fund Expenditures $3,833,000
Net Fiscal Impact $641,000

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1319
3 • projected net change in assessed value at $1.75 billion based on these assumptions. • Table 6 and Table 7 show the projected net increases in property tax and property tax in lieu of vehicle license fee (ILVLF) revenues associated with buildout of the Proposed Project. The calculations assume that the City’s General Fund would receive approximately 11.1 percent of the base 1.0 percent tax generated by new development in the Downtown Specific Plan Area after accounting for required Education Revenue Augmentation Funds (“ERAF”) reductions. At buildout, the Proposed Project is anticipated to increase annual City property tax revenue by approximately $1.9 million and annual ILVLF revenue by approximately $339,000. • Table 8 and Table 9 show assumptions related to taxable spending by new residents and employees in the Proposed Project and the estimated annual sales tax revenues associated with this new spending at full buildout of the Proposed Project. This analysis estimates that new employees and residents in the Proposed Project would spend approximately $41.5 million per year on taxable purchases in San Carlos, resulting in annual General Fund sales tax revenues totaling approximately $415,000. • Table 10 and Table 11 show assumptions used to estimate new hotel room revenues that would be subject to Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) and the annual TOT revenues associated with the Proposed Project at buildout. The City of San Carlos levies a 14.0 percent transient occupancy tax on hotel stays. If the hotel use is developed with 160 total rooms, the Proposed Project would result in new annual TOT revenues estimated at $1.1 million.
• Table 12 presents the projected change in other General Fund revenues associated with the Proposed Project. This includes License and Permit fees, Business License fees, Franchise fees, and Fines and Forfeitures. The FIA estimates that these fees will generate approximately $657,000 annually in new revenues for the City’s General Fund.
• Table 13 summarizes the annual recurring General Fund revenues generated by the Proposed Project. At buildout, the Proposed Project would generate approximately $4.5 million annually in new revenues for the City’s General Fund.

Service Costs and Expenditures
• Table 14 presents the General Fund expenditures per service population member, based on the City of San Carlos’ FY 2024-25 Adopted Budget Update. To estimate annual General Fund expenditures associated with buildout of the Proposed Project, the FIA estimates the portion of each department’s operating costs that are likely to increase as the service population increases. The resulting total net variable General Fund expenditures is estimated at $1,037.55 per service population member.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1320
4 • Table 15 presents the estimated increase in General Fund expenditures associated with the Proposed Project at full buildout, based on the estimates in Table 14 and estimated operating costs associated with buildout. The FIA estimates approximately $3.8 million in annual General Fund expenditures attributable to the project.

After the May 23, 2025 draft of this report, WRT provided specific operating cost estimates associated with the full buildout of improvements specified in the Downtown Specific Plan (see Attachment B). Operating costs were shown for Enhanced Basic Maintenance and Economic Enhancement Activities. Enhanced Basic Maintenance Activities include power washing sidewalks and paver deep cleaning, trash removal, restroom maintenance, EV charger maintenance, hardscape and landscape maintenance, public safety, and management costs. These costs are estimated to be $468,000, rounded to a $500,000 budget allocation. Economic Enhancement Activities, which are comprised of additional programming of downtown events with banners and clean-up, are estimated to cost $259,000 annually. Together, the estimated incremental operating costs are approximately $728,000 annually. Of this total, the Public Works Department would be responsible for $433,000, the Parks and Recreation Department (which has a Special Events Division) would cover approximately $248,000, and Public Safety would incur approximately $47,000 in additional expenses. For the Parks and Recreation Department, the detailed estimate is higher than the $183,000 shown in the May 23, 2025 FIA and so the revised FIA adds $65,000 to the estimate to bring the total to $248,000 annually. • Table 16 summarizes the estimated annual net fiscal impact of the Proposed Project at full buildout. The Proposed Project is estimated to have an annual net fiscal benefit of approximately $641,000 at full buildout, with $4.5 million in new General Fund revenues and $3.8 million in General Fund expenditures.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1321
5 ATTACHMENT A: FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLES
Table 1: Proposed Project Development Program Assumptions Notes:
(a) The Proposed Project analyzed in this FIA consists of the projected new development under the San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan, using existing development built on the ground as the baseline condition. (b) Number of hotel rooms calculated using the assumption of 650 gross square feet per room. (c) Service population equals the resident population plus a portion of the employment population to reflect the reduced service demand from commercial uses. To estimate service population, each employee is multiplied by 1/3.

Sources: WRT, California Department of Finance, Esri Business Analyst; BAE, 2025.

Table 2: Existing Service Population
Notes:
(a) California Department of Finance 1/1/2024 population estimate. (b) Esri estimate.
(c) Service population equals the resident population plus a portion of the employment population to reflect the reduced service demand from commercial uses. To estimate service population, each employee is multiplied by 1/3.

Sources: CA Department of Finance; Esri Business Analyst; BAE, 2025.

Proposed
Project (a)
Net Change in Commercial Square Feet 420,819
Office 163,702
General Commercial 92,721
Restaurant 60,445
Hotel 103,951
Net Change in Hotel Rooms (b) 160
Net Change in Residential Units 1,647
Market Rate Condominiums 330
Affordable Condominiums 82
Market Rate Apartments 1,050
Affordable Apartments 185
Net Change in Service Population (c) 3,631
Net Change in Resident Population 3,294
Net Change in Employment 1,012
City of San Carlos 2024
Residents (a) 29,420
Employees (b) 18,433
Service Population (c) 35,564

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1322
6 Table 3: Net New Service Population from Project at Buildout Notes:
(a) Office density assumption based on under development office and R&D projects in San Mateo County. (b) Employment density assumptions based on prior Bay Area employment density studies. (c) Residential density assumption based on the 2024 average household size in the San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan according to Esri Business Analyst (1.85 persons per household), rounded up. (d) Service population equals the resident population plus a portion of the employment population to reflect the reduced service demand from commercial uses. To estimate service population, each employee is multiplied by 1/3.

Sources: WRT, Esri Business Analyst; BAE, 2025.

Net New Commercial
Sq. Ft. / Residential
Units
Sq. Ft. per
Employee
Residents
per Unit (c)
Net New
Employees /
Residents
Net New Service
Population
Members (d)
Office (a) 163,702 300 n/a 546 182
General Commercial (b) 92,721 500 n/a 185 62
Restaurant (b) 60,445 400 n/a 151 50
Hotel (b) 103,951 800 n/a 130 43
Residential 1,647 n/a 2.00 3,294 3,294
Total 4,306 3,631

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1323
7 Table 4: Proposed Project Assessed Value Assumptions
Sources: Redfin, California Department of Housing and Community Development, San Mateo County Housing Authority, City of San Carlos; BAE, 2025.

Commercial
Commercial AV Assumptions Quantity
Office $900 per sf 163,702
General Commercial $650 per sf 92,721
Restaurant $650 per sf 60,445
Hotel AV Assumptions Quantity
Hotel Rooms $500,000 per room 160
Residential
Condominiums Market Rate Affordable
Sale Price per Unit $1,400,000 $302,000
Multifamily Apartments Market Rate Affordable
Average Monthly Rent (per unit) $5,000 $2,487
Vacancy Rate 5% 5%
Avg. Annual Expenses (per unit) $15,000 $15,000
NOI (per unit) $42,000 $13,354
Captialization Rate 5% 5%
Value per Unit $840,000 $267,000
Residential Assumptions Quantity
Total Units 1,647 units 1,647
For Sale % 25% of all units 412
For Sale Market Rate % 80% of for sale units 330
For Sale Inclusionary % 20% of for sale units 82
Rental % 75% of all units 1,235
Rental Market Rate % 85% of rental units 1,050
Rental Inclusionary Requirement % 15% of rental units 185

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1324
8 Table 5: Projected Net Change in Assessed Value at Full Buildout Source: BAE, 2025.

Table 6: Projected Change in Property Tax Revenue at Buildout Note:
(a) This is the City's share of the base 1.0 percent property tax in the TRAs that cover the Downtown Specific Plan Area, after accounting for the reduction in property tax revenues to fund ERAF.

Sources: San Mateo County Controller's Office; BAE, 2025.

Table 7: Projected Change in Property Tax ILVLF Revenue at Buildout Note:
(a) See Table 5.

Sources: City of San Carlos Adopted Budget Update FY2024/25, San Mateo County Assessor's 2024-2025 Annual Report; BAE, 2025.

Net Change in Total
Square Feet Hotel
Rooms / Residential
Units
Assessed Value per
Square Foot / Hotel
Room / Residential
Unit
Total Net
Change in
Assessed Value
Commercial
Office 163,702 $900 $147,332,000
General Commercial 92,721 $650 $60,269,000
Restaurant 60,445 $650 $39,289,000
Hotel 160 $500,000 $80,000,000
Residential
Market Rate Condominiums 330 $1,400,000 $462,000,000
Affordable Condominiums 82 $302,000 $24,764,000
Market Rate Apartments 1,050 $840,000 $882,000,000
Affordable Apartments 185 $267,000 $49,395,000
Total Net Change in Assessed Value at Full Buildout $1,745,049,000 Proposed
Project
Net Change in Assesed Value $1,745,049,000
Base 1% Property Tax Revenue $17,450,490
San Carlos Share of Base 1% Property Tax (a) 11.1%
Net Change in City Property Tax Revenue $1,943,239
Proposed Project
Net Change in Assesed Value (a) $1,745,049,000
Net Change in ILVLF Revenue from Proposed Project $338,787 Assumptions
Total Taxable Assessed Value, FY 24-25 $17,549,012,719
FY 24-25 Projected Property Tax in Lieu of VLF Revenue $3,407,000 ILVLF Revenue per $1,000 in Assessed Value $0.19

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1325
9 Table 8: Annual Taxable Sales per Resident
Notes:
(a) 2024 data inflated to February 2025 dollars. 2024 population estimates from the CA Department of Finance:

City of San Carlos: 29,420
San Mateo County: 741,565
(b) Retail spending for San Carlos residents is assumed to equal per capita spending in the County. If City residents spend fewer dollars per capita than in San Mateo County, the analysis assumes the difference leaks out to other retail locations in the county. A zero percent leakage indicates that residents can get all shopping needs met in San Carlos. Negative figures indicate that the City receives a net injection of sales, i.e. more sales than are likely attributable to just San Carlos residents. (c) While zero percent leakage indicates residents could meet their shopping needs within the City, shoppers are still likely to seek some goods and services outside of San Carlos. To provide a conservative estimate of new resident taxable spending, the maximum capture rate has been estimated at 85 percent of sales. (d) Equals (Taxable Sales per Capita in San Mateo County) x (Estimated % of Residents' Sales in City). Assumes the City will capture most or all new residents' retail spending in categories with low/no leakage, and little spending in high leakage categories. Assumes that mix of overall retail offerings in San Carlos remains relatively constant. (e) Total does not include taxable sales in the category classified as "All Other Outlets", as these taxable sales consist primarily of business-to-business sales taxes that would not be impacted by resident population growth.

Sources: CA Department of Finance; CA Department of Tax and Fee Administration; BAE, 2025. 2024 Taxable Sales per Capita (a) Est. % Estimated
Business Category San Carlos
San Mateo
County
Sales
Leakage (b)
Spending in
City (c)
New Sales
in City (d)
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers $1,301 $3,149 59% 41% $1,301 Home Furnishings and Appliance Stores $3,358 $884 -280% 85% $752 Bldg. Materials, Garden Equip. & Supplies $7,363 $1,444 -410% 85% $1,227 Food and Beverage Stores $708 $1,032 31% 69% $708
Gasoline Stations $1,347 $1,463 8% 85% $1,243
Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores $1,742 $874 -99% 85% $743 General Merchandise Stores $270 $1,630 83% 17% $270
Food Services and Drinking Places $4,287 $3,782 -13% 85% $3,215 Other Retail Group $2,681 $2,449 -9% 85% $2,082
Total (e) $23,056 $16,709 $11,541

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1326
10 Table 9: Projected Change in Total Annual Taxable Sales and General Fund Sales Tax Revenue from New Resident and New Employee Spending Notes:
(a) See Table 3.
(b) See Table 8.
(c) Based on data from the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC), Office-Worker Retail Spending in a Digital Age, 2012. Average weekly spending estimates were adjusted to 2025 dollars.

Spending estimates were adjusted to remove non-taxable spending on services and entertainment as well as a portion of spending at discount, warehouse, drug and grocery stores.

Estimated annual taxable expenditures assume a total of 49 work weeks per year.

Sources: ICSC, 2012; BAE, 2025.

Table 10: Hotel Occupancy, ADR, and RevPar Trends, San Carlos, 2015-2024 Notes:
(a) Figures have been adjusted to 2025 dollars.
(b) Revenue per available room (RevPAR) is calculated by multiplying the average daily rate by the average occupancy.

This figure represents the average daily revenue for all rooms in the sample after accounting for vacancy.

Sources: CoStar, US Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI; BAE, 2025.

Proposed
Project
Resident Taxable Sales
Number of New Residents (a) 3,294
Per Capita Taxable Sales in San Carlos (b) $11,541
Total New Resident Taxable Sales in San Carlos $38,016,130 Employee Taxable Sales
Number of New Employees (a) 1,012
Taxable Sales in San Carlos per Worker (c) $3,402
Total New Resident Taxable Sales in San Carlos $3,442,765 General Fund Sales Tax Revenue
Projected Net Change in Total Taxable Sales in San Carlos $41,458,895 San Carlos Share of Sales Tax Receipts 1.0%
Net Change in General Fund Sales Tax Revenue $414,589
Average Daily Rate
Year Occupancy Nominal $ 2025$ (a)
2015 82.7% $149.06 $204.32 $168.97
2016 80.9% $157.69 $209.84 $169.76
2017 79.2% $161.11 $207.70 $164.50
2018 80.5% $179.32 $222.58 $179.17
2019 78.6% $191.04 $229.52 $180.41
2020 47.9% $123.52 $145.89 $69.88
2021 57.3% $109.23 $125.00 $71.62
2022 70.1% $152.83 $165.62 $116.10
2023 72.1% $163.81 $171.24 $123.47
2024 73.1% $169.06 $171.98 $125.72
Average 72.2% $155.67 $185.37 $136.96
RevPAR
2025$ (b)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1327
11 Table 11: Projected Annual Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Revenues at Build Out Note:
(a) RevPAR based on 2015-2024 Annual Average Daily Rates and occupancy levels, adjusted for inflation to 2025 dollars using the Bureau of Labor Statistics CPI for the SF-OAK-SJ area.

Sources: CoStar; BAE, 2025.

Table 12: Projected Change in Other General Fund Revenue at Buildout Sources: City of San Carlos Adopted Budget Update FY2024/25; BAE, 2025.

Table 13: Summary of Net Change in Annual Revenues to the City of General Fund at Buildout
Source: BAE, 2025.

Proposed Project
Net New Hotel Rooms 160
Average RevPAR (a) $136.96
Estimated Annual Room Revenue $7,998,492
City of San Carlos TOT Rate 14%
Net Change in TOT Revenue $1,119,789
Proposed
Project
Net Change in City Service Population 3,631
Net Change in Other General Fund Revenues $656,971
Assumptions
Licenses and Permits $2,667,500
Business License Tax $1,316,600
Franchise Fees $2,121,400
Fines and Forfeitures $328,700
Total Other General Fund Revenue $6,434,200
Current Citywide Service Population 35,564
Total Other Revenue per Service Population Member $180.92 General Fund Revenues Total Percent
Property Tax $1,943,000 43.4%
ILVLF $339,000 7.6%
Sales Tax $415,000 9.3%
Transient Occupancy Tax $1,120,000 25.0%
Other Revenues $657,000 14.7%
Net Change in General Fund Revenues $4,474,000 100.0%

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1328
12 Table 14: General Fund Expenditures by Department, Adopted Budget FY 2024-25 Notes:
(a) See Table 3.

Sources: City of San Carlos Adopted Budget Update FY 2024-2025; BAE, 2025.

Table 15: General Fund Expenditure Impacts at Buildout
Notes:
(a) See Table 14.
(b) Equal to net variable General Fund operating expenditures per service population multiplied by the new service population associated with the proposed Project. (c) Includes an additional $65,000 in expenditures to account for Enhanced Basic Maintenance and Economic Enhancement Activities associated with the Downtown Specific Plan. See memo text description of Table 15 for full details. (d) Service population from the Project as shown in Table 3.

Sources: City of San Carlos Adopted Budget Update FY 2024-2025; BAE, 2025.

Department
FY 2024-25
General Fund
Expenditures
Less: Offsetting
Revenues from
Charges for
Services
Percent
Variable Due
to Growth
Net Variable
General Fund
Expenditures
Net Variable
Expenditures per
Service
Population
Member (a)
General Government $10,978,430 $0 10% $1,097,843 $30.87 Community Development $8,979,600 $2,107,700 60% $4,123,140 $115.93 Parks & Recreation $5,376,615 $2,396,150 60% $1,788,279 $50.28 Public Safety $26,538,170 $256,200 90% $23,653,773 $665.10 Public Works $10,002,225 $407,500 65% $6,236,571 $175.36 Total $61,875,040 $5,167,550 $36,899,606 $1,037.55
Department
Net Variable
Expenditures per
Service Population
Member (a)
Net Change in
Expenditures from
Project (b)
General Government $30.87 $112,096
Community Development $115.93 $420,998
Parks & Recreation (c) $50.28 $247,594
Public Safety $665.10 $2,415,193
Public Works (c) $175.36 $636,792
Total $1,037.55 $3,832,673
Net New Service Population (d) 3,631

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1329
13 Table 16: Annual Net Fiscal Impact to the City of San Carlos General Fund Source: BAE, 2025.

Proposed
General Fund Revenues Project
Property Tax $1,943,000
ILVLF $339,000
Sales Tax $415,000
Transient Occupancy Tax $1,120,000
Other Revenues $657,000
Net Change in General Fund Revenues $4,474,000
General Fund Expenditures
General Government $112,000
Community Development $421,000
Parks & Recreation $248,000
Public Safety $2,415,000
Public Works $637,000
Net Change in General Fund Expenditures $3,833,000
Net Fiscal Impact $641,000

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1330
14 ATTACHMENT B: ESTIMATED OPERATING & MAINTENANCE
COSTS
Note: Prepared on August 6, 2025.

Sources: Estimates by CSW/Stuber-Stroeh Engineering Group; Allocations by: BAE, 2025.

SAN CARLOS DOWTOWN - Laurel Street + Wheeler Plaza and Harrington Park Enhanced Basic Maintenance
UNIT

FREQUENCY COST UNIT QUANTITY COST
Month $6,000.00 MONTH 12 $72,000
Weekly $2,000.00 WEEK 52 $104,000
6x per week $350.00 DAY 312 $109,200
Annual $20,000.00 YEAR 1 $20,000
Daily $1,100.00 MONTH 12 $13,200
2x per year $1,200.00 EA 2 $2,400
Nightly $0.20 kWh 25,000 $5,000
4x per year $4,000.00 EA 4 $16,000
4x per year $10,000.00 EA 4 $40,000
4x per year $1,200.00 EA 4 $4,800
6x per year $1,500.00 EA 6 $9,000
8x per year $2,500.00 EA 4 $10,000
2x per year $3,500.00 EA 2 $7,000
Weekly $900.00 WEEK 52 $46,800
3x per year $3,000.00 EA 3 $9,000
Total Annual Cost (2025): $468,400
Recommend Budget: $500,000

NO CAPITAL REPLACEMENT COSTS INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE ASSESSMENT Economic Enhancement Activities
UNIT

FREQUENCY COST UNIT QUANTITY COST
2x per year $15,000.00 EA 2 $30,000
6x per year $18,000.00 EA 6 $108,000
4x per year $8,500.00 EA 4 $34,000
8x per year $5,000.00 EA 8 $40,000
$185.00 HR 256 $47,360
Total Annual Cost (2025): $259,400
TOTAL NEW OPERATING COSTS $728,000
Allocations:

Public Works Department $433,000
Parks and Recreation Department $248,000
Public Safety $47,000
Total Allocations $728,000
AV System
Fountain Maintenance
Permeable Paver Deep Clean
EV Charger Maintenance
Restroom
TASK
Management
Power Washing
Trash Removal
Tree Preservation
Safety
Accent Lighting Power
Accent Lighting Maintenance
Bioretention Area Inspection
Irrigation Maintenance
Landscape Maintenance
Replacement Planting
TASK
Movie/ Outdoor Play
Concert (Includes Setup)
Banners
Street Sweeping/ Cleanup

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1331

2022 - 2025
Appendix G
Community
Engagement
Downtown
Specific Plan
&
Downtown
Streetscape
Master Plan

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1332
Table of Contents
Stakeholder Focus Groups Interviews – 8/22/2022
Community Survey #1 Results - 8/8/22 to 1/15/23
Downtown Community Workshop #1 – 8/31/22
Downtown Community Workshop #2 – 2/15/23
Coffee and Comments Open House – 3/4/23
Community Survey #2 Results – 3/1/23 to 4/20/23
Status Update and Progress Report on City Council Meeting - 4/24/2023 Downtown Business Stakeholder Meeting – 5/24/23
Downtown Specific Plan Ideation Workshop (Virtual) – 12/6/23 Downtown Specific Plan Ideation Workshop (In-Person) – 12/9/23 Economic Development Advisory Committee (EDAC) Study Session – 1/23/24
Parks, Recreation, and Culture Commission (PRCC) Study Session – 2/13/24
Youth Advisory Committee (YAC) Study Session – 3/13/24
Downtown Business Stakeholder Meeting – 8/28/24
All Commissions Special Joint Meeting – 9/3/24
Downtown Business Stakeholder Meeting – 8/7/25
Downtown Advisory Committee Meetings – 2022 to 2025

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1333
Stakeholder Focus Groups Interviews
August 22, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1334
Stakeholder Focus Groups Interviews
August 22, 2022
The City conducted a series of interviews in August 2022 to learn about challenges and needs of specific stakeholders. The focus groups included:

Infrastructure, Mobility, Seniors-Children-Special Needs, and Downtown Business and Events. For the Infrastructure group, the stakeholders included representatives from Rethink Waste, Cal Water, and Mid-Peninsula Water District. For the Mobility group, the stakeholders included representatives from Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition, SamTrans, Caltrans, San Carlos Bikes, and Healthy Cities Tutoring. For the Senior-Children-Special Needs group, the stakeholders included representatives from Adult Community Center, Arbor Bay School and Art BIAS. For the Downtown Business and Events group, the stakeholders included representatives from City Parks Department and Chamber of Commerce. The City will conduct more focus groups interviews in the future phases of the Downtown Specific Plan project.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1335
Community Survey #1 Results
August 8, 2022 to January 14, 2023

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1336
Community Survey 1
An interactive mapping survey was developed and provided to the public from August 8, 2022 to January 15, 2023. There were approximately 470 comments across five subject areas. This included mobility, streetscape, gathering spaces, allowable uses, and other topics.

Survey 1 Summary

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1337
Downtown Specific Plan
City of San Carlos
August 8th, 2022 - January 15th, 2023
Interactive Survey 1
Feedback Summary

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1338
2 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Project Background
In March 2022, the City of San Carlos kicked-off the process to work with the community to create a new vision for Downtown San Carlos, including Laurel Street, El Camino Real, and the cross streets from Holly Street to Greenwood Avenue. This project, called the “Downtown Specific Plan,” will build upon what’s best and most loved about Downtown San Carlos, and take a close look at what needs updating or changing.

Survey Overview
A Social Pinpoint interactive mapping survey was developed and provided to the public. The questionnaire was open from August 8th, 2022 to January 15th, 2023. There were approximately 470 comments across five subject areas: mobility, streetscape, gathering spaces, allowable uses, and other comments.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1339
3 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
The Mobility topic garnered the most comments, with a total of 163 comments. The Streetscape topic had 83 comments. The Gathering Spaces topic had 75 comments. The Allowable Uses topic had 64 comments and the “Other Comments” category received 85 comments.

Social Pinpoint allows users to agree with (up vote) or disagree with (down vote) the comments of other questionnaire users. The most popular comments by topic area are shown below in Table 1, followed by the top 5 most popular comments of all the comments received on the platform shown in Table 2 and most popular comments in Table 3.

Community Survey Summary
Table 1: Most Popular Comment by Category

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1340
4 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Table 3: Most Popular Comments
Table 2: Most Popular Comment by Category
Attachment
Raw data from the survey.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1341
5 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1342

STREETSCAPE
Type Threads Map Layers Comment Up Votes Down Votes
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐19‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Love the idea of a youth/teen friendly park here, especially a space for bikes and wheels, like a mini modular pump track, or some kind of climbing, active play/physical challenge (low‐ risk) space.
00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐07‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
I love the idea of paint on streets, and it can be really beautiful and interesting, but when it fades, which it quickly can with traffic, it doesn't look so good anymore. Be careful with painting things that need to be maintained.
10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐43
Need to replace trees that continue to have aphid problems. Certain areas of the sidewalks have pigeons droppings that could be resolved by installing pigeon detractors. Bike lockers need to be installed downtown so people can shop without having to worry about there bikes and the components on them. Downtown zoning needs to be reviewed. There are too many bars with more on the way. There is already too much vomit around the area. Need to consider the homeless problem when designing new areas. 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐38‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Native plants appropriate for our climate would be lovely. 0 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐14‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Would love to see more native plants incorporated in the San Carlos plan. 1 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐42
I was deeply disturbed when I saw the mural painted on the wall facing the parking lot of Bianchini's market. The feeling has nothing to do with the ethnicity of the figure in the mural. The mural, in my opinion, is simply bad artwork and is disturbing in nature. For that reason I avoid Bianchini's market so I do not have to look at this mural. If this is the trend San Carlos is moving to, it is sad. Really poor taste. 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐24‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Diddams can do it themselves when they are charging such high prices! No need for the city to help! 00
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐28‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
I’m sure the city can spare a few benches and a fountain without throwing us into the next recession. 11
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐27‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
We have lived here for 20 years in our San Carlos home and know downtown continues it was not meant for residents it was meant for visitors and those unfamiliar visiting our downtown. San Carlos City Council has very deep pockets for many many other beautification projects and I’m sure this would be a special addition to the town. 10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐09‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Not true. The parking is essential for businesses whether it be restaurant dining patrons, banking customers, Uber drivers obtaining goods for customers, people going to post mail at the post office or purchase groceries. You have no idea what you are talking about. What "VIBE" are you referencing because I grew up in San Carlos and can tell you that a small town always has had a road like Laurel that bridges the community together. You do not know what you state, nice shill for Shiki Bistro btw
01 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐15‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Upgraded? Like it is software? This is a physical space of land occupying a city, within a county, within a state, within a country, within a continent, within the world. Explain the vibrancy, does it attract additional members to experience the city? Is it merely a visual queue but nothing to actually attract future city‐folk? 11 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐28‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Who exactly is going to fund the fountain or seating. What hours will they be accessible to‐ from? 01
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐27‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Do you realize how much Custom light posts would cost the City/Tax Payers comparatively to traditional/non‐custom light posts would cost? Menlo Park is a highly affluent community compared to San Carlos with only some residents making up the highly compensated residents. People that grew up here know when downtown ends... You forefingers do not know because this is not your home.
01 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐12‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Bring a flashlight if you don't like it. Unlike China, the United States of America somewhat enjoy areas where we can "shine a light" and have it read from space as the non‐normative. 01 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐14‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
The more trees and greenery the better. Build less buildings and more crops, vegetation, floral arrangements instead along the peninsula please. 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐11‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Eye sore? You yourself are an eyesore coming into our home and telling us what we aught to expect to see in our skyline. The paint is an "eye sore" therefore we need to improve the landscape? What specifically would you suggest instead of such vague details? 01 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐38‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
What is a regular tree? What constitutes a "nicer" street‐scape? Who has driven by in recent memory of significant importance that has stated this area needs major renovation".

Absolute SUBVERSIVENESS. Keep the trees, remove YOU.
00 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1343
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐06‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
How exactly do you do this? Is this the responsibility of street vendors or that of the City/Tax Payers? Moot point with no support for future improvement. BOT GENERATED RESPONSE ONCE MORE.
00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Would love to see Laurel closer to traffic most days…perhaps eliminate the sidewalks and install stone “wall‐to‐wall” like a European square. Install more artistic semi‐permanent Street barriers and include the ability for traffic to enter as necessary. Ideally this would be supported by additional very close parking.
12 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐41
Specific Plan
Study Area
Would love to see Wheeler Plaza become a green space market…think of the setting of Field Works. It could be used for public gatherings, a Christmas market, and a rotating pop up restaurant/beer garden. Even better to knock down the old Mavericks burger/ Boulanger Building.
10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐40
Specific Plan
Study Area
Lots of ways to beautify our pedestrian area on a budget. See Le Plateau Mont Royal:https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.istockphoto.com% 2Fphotos%2Fmontreal‐
plateau&psig=AOvVaw3rKeh_qdMA82IXQISC8WrS&ust=1673731044821000& source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CA8QjRxqFwoTCJix8ZS8xfwCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAK 20 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐39
Specific Plan
Study Area
There are so many creative ways to beautify our closed street(s). I am attaching some pics from Montreal that I captured with our downtown in mind! 31 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐24‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Diddams makes plenty off this community. It's not the taxpayers' responsibility.  Diddams needs to step up their game. 11
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐07‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
There are some really intriguing solar paints out right now that lower the temperatures of asphalt. Painting the streetscapes in these paints would be gorgeous and lower the heat index in these areas.  https://www.fastcompany.com/90788163/thanks‐to‐this‐innovative‐ new‐paint‐this‐schools‐playground‐just‐got‐12‐degrees‐cooler 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
There are many benefits to having car‐less spaces. I’d just like to note that it’s also incumbent on us to be thoughtful about how we’ll provide access for those in our community who have difficulty with mobility.
20 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐38
Specific Plan
Study Area
Regular trees and nicer street scape would really make a difference to attracting more pedestrians/patrons to this area 41
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐34‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Totally agree. When I lived in another part of the country, we used to travel to a promenade where it was pedestrian only. It was an experience both for date night and family night! 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐36‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Burlingame street curbs on the corners are also more wheelchair and stroller friendly, although to be safer three instead of two barrier posts might be more helpful. 10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐29‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
We need more parking for our downtown but it would be nice if it was designed better for visual appeal and greater community usage. 20
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐37
Specific Plan
Study Area
I would love to see all of Laurel closed to traffic from Morse to San Carlos Avenue and turned into a wonderful walking/outdoor cafe/shopping area.  Plenty of parking nearby at Wheeler/Caltrain and the other large public lots.
41 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐36
Specific Plan
Study Area
Whether or not Laurel St is made to be pedestrian only, the sidewalks should be improved aesthetically by using pavers similar to Burlingame Ave. 72 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐35
Specific Plan
Study Area
El Camino businesses need some attention.  There should be a beautification project, incentives or grants to replace signage, awnings, perk up their storefronts.  Planters with no‐ water plants only as dead plants are worse then no plants. 10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐18‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
I like the idea of a mural or a park. I like the idea of the mural ideas being available for comment, too, before a decision is made. 10
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐10‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
I like other surfaces being considered beside asphalt/concrete. Cobblestones with sections of turf. Places to sit on the ground/turf and benches. Plants and trees. 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐34
Specific Plan
Study Area
Laurel street in downtown shall become a pedestrian zone. Parking spots and sidewalks shall be removed. Instead permanent outdoor seating for restaurants, sustainable landscaping shall be introduced to entice people to linger, shop, and eat in a relaxed atmosphere. 62 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐33
Specific Plan
Study Area
Id like to see Laureal closed from San Carlos Ave to Bianchinis. However, I hate the unsightly orange blockades. Id love to see those gone and some sort of planters put up. also I do not think the parklets are very appealing. If possible I think it would be good to have a similar, better design for them. Unfortunately, I have noticed rats on Laurel (even when it is not too late in the evening) Can something be done about this? Beautification, parking, cleanliness are important, thank you
22 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
I agree.  The benefits way outweigh the loss of driving right up to the store.  The point is to enjoy the space, not just to purchase things quickly.  Plus allowing cars creates noise and air pollution when you're walking or eating on the street.
31 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1344
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐32
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
The over‐the‐top access to the seldom‐used Union bank parking lot here is a major detractor. There are multiple entrances to this park lot, and so much infrastructure devoted to a lane to exit onto Laurel is ridiculous.
62 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐24‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area It looks a mess 10
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐31
Specific Plan
Study Area
Love the closed street, but the restaurants have built essentially a new row of tacky buildings. The outdoor seating should be more open to give the street a feeling of an open public area rather than a closed‐in feeling between 2 rows of plywood walls. No walls should be allowed other than low dividers. Imagine lovely tables and chairs with umbrellas open to the street as is common in European plazas.
10 1
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐03‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Yes to murals 00
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐30
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Make the blocked off street permanent. Turn this space into gathering space ‐ similar to what is in front of movie cinemas in Redwood city 12 5
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
We recently had an emergency and needed to move the barriers to pick up an elderly family member. Being able to move the orange barriers was very helpful (thanks to volunteers who came to help!). Whatever barriers are chosen, they need to be moveable for emergencies. 11 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐29
Specific Plan
Study Area
Eliminate the parking at this point and create retail shops or a local park with a central fountain. Such an eye sore right as people enter downtown and breaks up all the shops 61 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐28
Specific Plan
Study Area
This area has a courtyard in front of the retail would be a great place for a fountain or seating 11 1
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐27
Specific Plan
Study Area
Consider custom light posts like downtown Menlo Park all along Laurel to let people know downtown continues and they would keep walking this direction 14 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐26
Specific Plan
Study Area Great spot for public art. Maybe a statue to San Carlos founders or something 5 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐25
Specific Plan
Study Area Close this alley and create a retail space to continue shops instead of breaking the street 8 5 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐24
Specific Plan
Study Area Diddams is looking a bit older these days can the city improve this building. 9 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23
Specific Plan
Study Area
Close all of Laurel to cars give it back to the people. Create a beautiful street full of greenery and gathering places. Add a bike line 22 6
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐22
Specific Plan
Study Area
El Camino planters are lacking compared to neighboring cities for all of San Carlos. Consider enhancing those downtown to entice travelers to visit our town. 60 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐15‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Great Mural. Love seeing it every‐time i pass by 1 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐21
Specific Plan
Study Area Consider an arched City of San Carlos sign similar to downtown Redwood City 6 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐20
Specific Plan
Study Area
Get rid of the parking in front of Bianchinis and create a space with trees and seating allowing that area to be accessible. 53
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐19
Specific Plan
Study Area
Eliminate this parking lot and create the opportunity to build retail to continue the shops along Laurel to remove the eyesore. Or create the space into a public park with a playground to attract more people to the area.
71 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐18
Specific Plan
Study Area Add a parklet/mural to this alleyway that is an eyesore. To the downtown area. 8 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Exactly. Menlo Park has done this well with painted barriers and plenty of trees and foliage to enhance the scene 20
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐17
Specific Plan
Study Area
Close the 4 Wells Fargo parking spaces and place a parklet here instead. Helping increase walking access to the wheeler garage, reducing constant close calls by pedestrian and cars pulling out. Or infill with a small building to keep the continuous shops of Laurel 80 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1345
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐16
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Love the pedestrian plaza — recommend to make it permanent and update the road grading/surface and barriers to make it feel more intentional and less like a temporary fix. 26 2 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐15
Specific Plan
Study Area
This mural (and the smaller one at mama coco) are great and make the city so vibrant.  As Laurel gets upgraded, please consider more murals on any blank facades 16 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐14
Specific Plan
Study Area
Trees, plants, flowers and greenery adds beauty, creates serenity and adds value to any urban setting.  Tree shade is good too to block the Sun and wind. 71 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐13
Specific Plan
Study Area
It would be nice to have a few restaurants that operate in the middle of the closed, down street. 11 4
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐12
Specific Plan
Study Area
This block is really dark at night. Would love to see some lighting added so it feels nicer to walk at night. 20 1
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
The orange barriers are an eyesore.  This could be a very simple and quick solution.

Also the restaurant outside 'wooden boxes' look unattractive. Mountainview and RWC have done a much better job with seats and flowerbeds rather than horrible wooden boxes. Can we get this done soon ‐ waiting for 2 years is a waste. Let's get the basics done. 40 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐10‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Completely agree. Redwood City and Mountain View have done far better in creating a more desireable downtown area. Why do we still have orange barriers ‐ it's unattractive ‐ surely there is a better alternative
10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐07‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Back to basics. The street should open again since it is hurting the businesses on the 600 block. The merchants leased the spaces assuming no traffic blockage. It is not fair. ALL MERCHANTS on the 600 block feel very strongly about removing the road blocks.

Yes, this was an exception during covid but this can not continue. The restaurant expansion not only blocking visibility to the neighboring businesses and taking valuable parking away.

It’s about time to act fairly to non‐food merchants.
36 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐11
Specific Plan
Study Area
Some of these multi use buildings are a bit of an eye sore and could at least get an updated paint job. A better paint color selection would really help! 12 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
It would nice if this could be done sooner than later! Why wait for the full 2 years of the detail plan implementation to take care of something like this.  The orange barriers are an eyesore and replacing them now would give residents and visitors a good feel for the City’s intentions to improve downtown look, feel and use!
40 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐02‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
There's also the aphid problem in the zelkova trees. I think the city is addressing. 1 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐10
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
From a Carlmont student: This area should look like the street in front of the movie theater in Redwood City. 13 5
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐09
Specific Plan
Study Area
Mentioned elsewhere too, there are too many parking lots here which kill the “downtown vibe.”  It’s not very people friendly.  Banks seem to be consistent purveyors of this. Shiki Bistro is at least turning their lot into something more interesting though it’s so far from the street and people.  I’d love to see a more people‐oriented use of this space. 16 1
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐07‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
This is a great thought.  I love the photo concept of a mural on the street. Adding a mural to the massive blank wall of Diddams would be fantastic as well. 30 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐08
Specific Plan
Study Area
This intersection is a combination of four spaces that each need significant improvements to make the space a “place.”  1) All banks in downtown have terrible fronts that pedestrians only want to quickly walk past.  Having the parking lot in front of Biancinis and on the main downtown walk takes away from the downtown feel. Imagine if Biancinis went up to the sidewalk, they could easily add a cafe/restaurant‐like to the store, but can’t with a parking lot.  Post office is like the banks.
82 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
We also need the barriers to be seamless from one block to another for ease of moving around especially for people with mobility concerns. 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
I agree! Tall planters designed by the Master Gardeners could be a good solution for visually and physically closing Laurel Street. Santana Row's planters are worth a look: most get their height from decorative vertical elements, and some have lockable wheels for easier street cleaning and emergency access.
40 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐07
Specific Plan
Study Area
Assuming the street closure remains, the intersection of Laurel and Cherry—as well as the intersection of Laurel and Olive—should be beautified to better attract foot traffic and to encourage cars to slow down. Perhaps we could paint the asphalt in happy colors? Maybe we could start a tradition where the middle schools come up with designs—subject to City approval, of course—and the community comes out for a re‐painting day every year. 21 0

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1346
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐02‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Agreed. The regular cleaning and power washing of downtown has not been happening as often as normal. Often after the farmers market on Sundays there will be fruits/veggies/trash laying in the street.
10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐06
Specific Plan
Study Area Create a more appeasing streetscape to attract retailers to this side of the Laurel. 24 3 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐05
Specific Plan
Study Area Enhance this intersection to signal entry to San Carlos. 13 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐03‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Yes, more murals please! 1 0
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
I agree! If the closure is to become permanent, nicer looking barriers would be great. 3 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐04
Specific Plan
Study Area Murals would be nice 80
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐02
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
The sidewalks are VERY sticky from dropped and spilled food and drinks. 8 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐03
Specific Plan
Study Area Murals on the tall buildings would look great! 14 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
remove the orange barriers and make it a nicer closed street ‐ similar to some of the RWC no car streets. 50 1

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1347
Mobility
Comment Up Votes Down Votes
Not everything needs a traffic light. Changing one or more of these intersections would really change the feel of driving San Carlos ave. 00 This is one of the most important and poorly used spaces in downtown. It is a difficult and poorly laid out parking area, that is unattractive, and with poor access to the streets or businesses that one would visit while parking here. There should be an inviting pedestrian entrance to Laurel, for examples. Others have made interesting suggestions as well.
00 Can Walnut also be an extension of downtown? What about a one‐way walnut street so that a wide bike lane, and maybe even diagonal parking on Walnut can be included?
00 The timing of these and the Old Country Rd/Holly lights is really bad. This should be improved or something should be done to reduce traffic flow through here. 10 agree, i'd love to see a one‐way loop around the downtown, that includes the alleys for vehicles, so the pedestrian zone for 2 blocks, can stay. 00 Yes, of course the stairs should be repaired and reopened. How long would the city leave them in disrepair if not? Repairing seems like the only reasonable option, and it opens pedestrian access from Cherry street.
00 We need to open up Laurel Street for traffic flow on all the blocks of Laurel.

Blocking off traffic so that restaurants can have access to the sidewalk and street is cutting off the flow of "traffic" to the local merchants whose stores are on the block of the "no traffic" street.  This is having an adverse affect on their businesses. 00 Might be more interesting to create a pedestrian space in the alley, and let traffic and parking continue on Laurel. 01
Agreed, please make sure Laurel Street is very accessible to bikes, with safe parking for bikes too
10 I also shop far less often in San Carlos now that Laurel Street is closed to traffic.  I guess it might depend on where you live in town.  I live in White Oaks, and now must either drive through town on residential streets that have children walking to and from school (Cedar or  Cordilleras), or I drive north on El Camino, overshoot my destination, and walk back to the downtown area. I used to shop at least 3 times a week in San Carlos, now maybe once or twice a month to support local shops.
00 This section is very unfriendly to pedestrians because the sidewalk is already very narrow, there's space taken up by signs and utility poles, and cars are parked ON the sidewalk.
00 Removing parking from one side so that cars can drive through faster would not make this area safer. 00
A physical barrier between car traffic bike/pedestrian traffic is more effective than any "awareness"  or "visibility" campaign, because of physics. It also prevents people from blocking bike lanes and forcing bikers into car traffic.

Best practice while riding in the street is to take the whole lane. No biker enjoys doing this, and it's also inconvenient for drivers.
10 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1348
A minor crossing is any that does not have a traffic signal. If it's agreed that this is not a minor crossing, there should be a signal here.

While we certainly appreciate the vehicles that yield to people walking, there are plenty of vehicles that do not.

Then concern with wheelchairs is that going down to street level then back up is more effort than keeping the sidewalk at the same level. In addition, water tends too pool at the bottom of the ramps.
10 To add to this, currently the closest carshare is in redwood city. 0 0 This is a blind corner that challenging to navigate through as a pedestrian. Cars frequently exit out of the parking without looking for pedestrians; it's poorly designed as it is. Consider how this could be made safer (Mirror? Relocating the vehicular stop 10 feet back? etc.)
00 If this remains a parking lot would appreciate a better flow. Seen lots of near missed from confusion in which ways cars are allowed, traffic flow etc 20 I’m pretty sure they mean passage between downtown and getting to old county not crossing the 101
00 Possibly consider a double red arrow to turn ? Maybe would help with the blocking of the the street ? 00
With all the new developments happing on Old County Road it would be nice to have paths on each side of El Camino to enhance the accessibility of getting downtown on foot.
10 Would be greatly appreciated to have a sidewalk as mentioned to help assist flow of people I have seen walking on the road in an unsafe manner due to no sidewalk. 00 Just a heads up that UPS is moving locations down the street to be on San Carlos ave! 00
Who are you to say what is final? This is just a suggestion from a fellow citizen respectfully say your piece and leave it at that. The city has this as a brainstorming among all. Given your tone I assume you have left all the other agrees I’ve comments on this site. Disappointing really.
00 This should be an easy fix ‐‐ a million other stoplights in the area are designed this way so the City should be able to fix this quick! 00
Nope this is not a "minor crossing" and yes vehicles do stop and let pedestrians go currently. No need to change what is working. 01
as other commenter said keep parking free 0 0
Consider a parking garage here to account for Laurel parking remaining closed 2 0 No. This makes it difficult for people to get from El Camino/101 into downtown ‐‐ how else would people turn onto Laurel? And would Walnut soon become just as much of a problem?
10 The city needs to commit to keeping Wheeler Plaza, Laurel Street, the parking behind Diddams, and any other public spots free of charge. Do not turn San Carlos into Redwood City, San Mateo, or other cities with paid parking — this would detract from our community's small‐town feel and reduce locals who still use Laurel as a place for services, grocery shopping, etc. in addition to as a destination. 51 Agreed. Also we have too many banks on the street 1 0

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1349
Lets get more patrol guards along these streets instead of them providing private security for large corporations or other merchants who divert law enforcement away from local surveillance.
00 Well we should not have built a bunch of new housing projects in the area. I wish we never did but now that we have the reality is those people need to park, will have over guests and will inevitably lead to an increase in demand for parking.

Thank your local city planners for thinking ahead!!!!
02 The library could certainly focus on maintaining access to the building for all respectful individuals with a genuine interest in pursuing knowledge. 00 How many children are riding down this street? What times particularly? Are they aware of best practices while riding a bicycle along busy streets? Have they tried riding such bicycles in San Francisco during a weekday? THAT IS BUSY. Until then, parental guidance, proper safety gear and a keen sense of awareness will do better than any renovations.
02 N
O
01 Have you been living under a rock? We have plenty of parking around laurel and do not need any more. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
02 No, do not suggest we waste taxpayer funds. Courteous vehicles will stop for pedestrians using appropriate hand signs or pedestrians being mindful of vehicles.

Why impede vehicles from the natural flow of traffic? I guarantee any respectful individual will stop for a wheelchair/disabled pedestrian attempting to cross. 01 Do not disturb the alleyways of San Carlos. That is Final. 0 1 Where are people from outside the city supposed to park their vehicles? You wish to drive visitation which will come at the cost of local benefit. Shiki Bistro is "Far from the street"?? Really it is directly off El Camino or Laurel, two extremely popular streets.
00 What is the exact percentage of "DISABILITY PARKING" comparative to "NON‐ DISABLED PARKING" for the city of San Carlos, specifically pertaining to Laurel. For instance lets say we have 300 spots but perhaps 75 are allocated for handicapped patrons . Do we have a specific number and are these spaces evenly distributed/able to accommodate current traffic trends? 00 Why? Secondly what does an "ECR SAFE CROSSING" entail specifically? 0 1 Arroyo is arguably close to industrial. You feel like you are in unconquered territory? There are lights of El Camino for God's sake... 11 No we do not want a high rise complex for living or parking. What is wrong with you people? You come here knowing nothing about our way of life and then you expect us to sit by idly as you dictate to us what life aught to be? 01 No‐man's land sounds pretty intense. Could you elaborate? I have grown up in such said area and I find your point disturbing and non‐nonsensical. 01 OH NO!!! YOU HAVE TO CROSS THE STREET??? WHATEVER WILL WE CIVILIANS DO? Especially walking across the gentrifying town‐homes built along El Camino Real. It really is a struggle having to press the button to cross across two streets instead of one. What ever will we do? The world itself may stop turning... 01 WHAT EXACTLY DOES ECR SAFE CROSSING ENTAIL? 0 1

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1350
I have grown up in the Bay Area using bus stops that were not even clearly marked or define. In fact I enjoyed those stations much more than many other metropolitan areas with multiple signs and clear emphasis. I have walked across important roads with no sidewalk.

You seek to engulf these cities in debts they have never had to participate in based off of your shortsightedness and as an outsider.
00 OH NO!!! A BICYCLE RIDER NEEDS ASSISTANCE!!! QUICK LETS DEPLOY ALL RESOURCES AT ONCE TO RECTIFY THIS AT ONCE!!!! 02
WHAT IS ECR???? WEAK POINT 0 0
OH NO! YOU MEAN YOU HAVE TO VENTURE OUTSIDE THE LINES? COLOR OUTSIDE THE LINES!!?!?! THIS IS UNHEARD OF AND EXTREMELY UNSETTLING!!! Ridiculous, pathetic, infantile.
03 No we actually would not like to see additional LIGHT POLLUTION at night. You know how you bots use POLLUTION as a net‐negative. IT IS NOT NECESSARY. 00 No we do not need intelligent cameras like that of CHINA with SOCIAL CREDIT RATINGS. This is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA in case you forgot. We do not believe in communism unlike China. IF you have to wait, which will not be for long, heaven forbid you have to wait less than 60 seconds to turn or progress on your path. Stupid non‐nonsensical logic applied once again you bot‐spammers. 00 No WE shouldn't. Cameras do nothing to prevent car theft or other crime, therefore they should not adopt Chinese‐style surveillance to spy on innocent civilians. People EXISTING adds to pollution, does that mean certain people should no longer exist? The individual emissions contribute nothing comparative to large corporations exporting manufacturing offshore and then importing such goods to our local to provide them for unwitting consumers. What exactly does SMART entail? Social Credit Rating?
00 There is a bridge which enables this already between Oracle/Mercedez Dealership and Western San Carlos/Belmont. 02
False, the unnecessary backup on El Camino Real comes from too many drivers seeking "refuge" on the streets located within Belmont/San Carlos. Simply speaking, search elsewhere if you want to turn.
01 Why do we need more living? Who exactly is "living" here that previously wasn't? Refuge? really??? A place safe from danger or distress? Life is constantly full of danger and distress so this is a moot point which does not require any modification of any kind. IF individuals feel unsafe they should seek alternative routes like the rest of us.
01 1. If we go back to parking on Laurel, please, please don't put in metered parking.

Let's keep our downtown friendly. I don't shop in Redwood City for just that reason‐‐why would I pay them to shop in their shopping district; they should be paying me!

2. I think there is an untapped market for busy shops/dining on our side streets of Laurel.
21 I visit Laurel far more often because I don't have to deal with the crappy drivers we were plagued with before. Compared to other nearby towns, parking is a breeze here.
02 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1351
Thank you for the opportunity to share thoughts, would love to see more green/plants, more seating/walking space, where one can carry a book to read and just hang out, not necessarily to a specific Cafe or restaurant, but a common space/courtyard with art displays, may be groups can sign up and reserve their day to display their art forms dance or paintings. Schools can reserve a day to demo their work. An inviting space where we can observe special days, Teacher's day/Quotes/paintings/Learnings
30 I love the plants along Walnut, but they could do w/ some pruning or different plant selection near the exit from Wheeler parking. Really difficult to see cars coming from the left as you leave the parking lot
10 From a traffic / backing up the light POV, I'd like to keep right on red legal here 0 1 It’s great that you can walk. I can’t. Nor can many others with ease. A pedestrian‐ only downtown would have many benefits, but I would like to be able to participate in the life of my community. EVs might not be the solution but thought has to be given to access for all.
10 Bike parking combined with art to beautify the space and signify the start of the pedestrian centered street closure. 41
If possible it would be nice to have a few more disability parking spaces on Laurel.

I’m sure there is a ratio of needed spaces but a few extra would be appreciated. It is very difficult to take someone who can’t walk to dinner on Laurel due to parking. 22 ECR should have a bus rapid transit lane and a protected bike lane. This would make the bus have the ability to come at closer intervals (think every 10 minutes!) making the bus a viable option that could significantly reduce traffic.

ECR would be an amazing bikeway if protected. Think of the gorgeous bike lanes in Seattle (with beautiful planters separating the bike lane from cars). Seattle and European cities did it on streets that had even higher traffic volumes to great result!
20 need parking on Laurel, not eating in the street! 2 9 All of Laurel St. must be opened for parking and traffic again.  My bank parking lot is full alot, with no place for me to park because people park there and walk to Laurel St.   It also makes it difficult to shop on Laurel St.  I never even want to go down there anymore, and friends feel the same way.
36 Can the parking lot be brighter? 0 0
Pedestrian bridges would be fantastic.  If not, please set the white line where cars are supposed to stop at least 5 feet from the crosswalk.  Most cars stop, after driving past the crosswalk lines.  It's not fun trying to guess as a pedestrian whether that speeding car sees you or not.  I think traffic lights now give pedestrians a head start on crossing the street, which is a great thing but let's go further for safety.
01 Consider parking only on one side of Walnut. I’ve seen too many mirrors broke off parked cars as well as standoffs on who gives the right of way. 11 Make this a red zone. You have two turning lanes, where the inside lane is blocked by parked cars.  This causes an unnecessary back up on el Camino. 31 Consider parking only on one side of Walnut. I’ve seen too many mirrors broke off parked cars as well as standoffs on who gives the right of way. 03 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1352
Make this a way one way in.  Very dangerous and blind exit for drivers and pedestrians. 00
build a sense of connect and safe passage between Laurel Street and the East side 2 0 Similar to comment at Brittan & Laurel, no way to trigger the light for a cyclist except to wait for car or get off bike and push pedestrian beg button. Need to use the proper loop technology.
50 To get to Laurel from El Camino, turn onto Holly going west, then turn left onto Laurel. 00
Cherry Street needs to only have parking on one side, Two cars can barely pass, and it's not safe when it's such a thoroughfare from the Elms, Library, and Central Middle School.
21 Sounds good to me. 0 0
The sidewalk between Brittan and Arroyo is a no‐man's land. It feels like the city only starts at Arroyo. Why is that ? 21
You can't walk from Brittan to Arroyo on the track side. 2 0 There isn't a proper sidewalk between Howard and Brittan, on the track side. It's just a vacant lot. 21
We should work on improving the timing of these traffic lights with intelligent cameras. Too often, there's nobody coming from the opposite lane or to use the crosswalk, yet we have to wait to turn. The time waiting idle at a red light also adds to the pollution. A comprehensible smart traffic light project for El Camino would be a great improvement for everybody: cars, buses, bicycles, and pedestrians.
30 As someone else who uses this crossing frequently: if we can't get a protected crossing (which would be *amazing* and really activate the Caltrain plaza), then the light timings could be made worlds better for pedestrians. They are about as bad as possible right now.
20 What would you suggest people do to get into Laurel St, coming from El Camino ? They would have to make a U‐Turn at San Carlos & Walnut, which is probably not safer.
10 There aren't enough chargers in the city. Wheeler Plaza seems like a good place to expand 20
Agreed, we desperately need *physically separated* bike lanes especially on San Carlos Ave. If tiny European towns can figure out how to build these everywhere, affordably, San Carlos can figure it out. As e‐bikes become more common, our hills also become less of an obstacle to getting around town without a car. 50 Laurel seems perfect for this. 2 0
Does BofA really need such a large dedicated lot. It's mostly empty. Could the city purchase some of the lot for public parking? 31
Please improve the availability of short‐term (15 min) public parking in the alleys so that quick visits to businesses is easy. At the moment, there are hardly any spaces and trucks after park and block off access to large sections. 40 We're talking about a couple of blocks here, it's not like the walk will be that long, and more walking is the whole point of the exercise.  I don't want to pay for courtesy transportation of a few blocks ‐ it's a small downtown area 00 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1353
The Town should be for people not for cars.  Business will adapt.  Plus who wants to breath in car fumes when you're walking or eating? 70 Orange plastic barriers on San Carlos and Laurel cheapen the nice look of these areas.

Consider barrels, options used by other nice cities or last resort paint them neutral colors. Thank you, Linda Kuhli. 650‐207‐3561
40 I think the orange plastic barriers in front of restaurant outdoor areas along San Carlos Ave west of El Camino, and on Laurel St look cheap and unsightly. Look to our upscale neighbors to the south, like Palo Alto for examples of what to use for a much nicer look ‐ like barrels ‐ or or at the least cover or paint them. Thank you, Linda Kuhli
[email protected]
30 Also very unsafe at the other end of this same block at Elm and Olive. Kids walk along School St and then dart across here. It’s very dangerous! 10 Absolutely! I see kids running across the intersection after school headed in the direction of downtown and it is so unsafe! 00
Riding a bike down San Carlos Avenue is terrifying especially for kids. Too many speeding cars. Can we create some safer bike routes to downtown? 12 1 An underpass is what European countries do that this situation. Also would help create flow to what was the cafe there 00
Exactly. Except Laurel is too narrow I think. We would have to consider making it a one way street to expand the sidewalks and add greenery. With parallel parking on one side and a a bike lane on the other ?
00 Consider Burlingame downtown with less parking and more storefronts/areas for pedestrians 75
This space is an accident waiting to happen. A mirror is needed ASAP 0 0 I agree that a pedestrian bridge is probably not feasible and that the best solution to this issue is timing the traffic light to pedestrians and buses rather than cars. In terms of cars not being safe, maybe some traffic calming measures such as on the outer lanes of El Camino, which are currently unimpeded, which allows cars to speed through there way too fast.
10 Closing the main 3 blocks of downtown to vehicles and filling out the street with seating, green spaces/ trees, and space for restaurants. A unique feature that no local downtown has, that could enhance the atmosphere making it a real meeting place and local draw. There is plenty of other parking elsewhere these spots on laurel are too valuable to the community as a whole.
30 Mirrors for cars driving out into San Carlos ave. Better signage. Cars frequently roll onto the sidewalk and appear pretty dangerous. 80
I don’t think my peg on the map worked. It was suppose to be on Laurel.

I strongly believe that there are only 2 options for Laurel ‐ open it to all traffic or provide additional, convenient and easily accessed parking.

I also believe strongly that all the “parklettes” for restaurants should be removed. I do not know the financial details of transactions related to them but the additional space to multiple businesses seems unfair to there whose parking had been removed and store area not inc
00 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1354
I would love for Laurel to be redeveloped as a pedestrian plaza but acknowledge that parking and quick access to the buildings may be needed by some residents — seems like upgrading this alley to accommodate more parking or access would be a natural fit since it is underutilized and poorly signed at the moment, 72 Agreed. Also add signage to encourage turning right to park in the Sam Trans structure. Visitors don't know that there's free public parking there. 00 Repair and open these stairs to improve pedestrian access to the library. 11 0 Minor crossings like this one could use continuous sidewalks. These not only make it easier for wheelchair users to cross the street, but also force vehicles to slow down, improving safety for everyone.
10 2
This intersection is extremely hostile to pedestrians. There are several improvements to make this safer:

1. Prohibit right turns on red.

2. Put the traffic signal on the near side of the intersection, to prevent drivers from encroaching on crosswalks.

3. Add refuge islands and use independent walk signals for the lanes in each direction.

4. Use sensors to make the signal pattern adapt to both vehicle and non‐vehicle traffic.

More details:
https://youtu.be/_ByEBjf9ktY
70 I LOVE wheeler plaza parking, and park there multiple times/week, but the top floor has become a frequent bathroom. It smells like pee pretty badly up there.

Any chance of regular washing (AND public restrooms downtown!)? 40 This bus stop is completely inaccessible:  no sidewalk, no shelter, just gravel. I've seen elders and others with limited mobility struggling to get where they need to be before the bus drives past them.
41 would love to see 3‐5 blocks of Laurel street permanently closed and made pedestrian friendly.  Many CA cities have made pedestrian malls (Santa Monica as an example)
20 8
Suggest no left turn from San Carlos onto Laurel (both directions).  At times of any traffic, the turn is impossible due to oncoming cars, yet people still sit there trying, blocking the entire lane until the light turns red.
76 This bike rack set up is absurd taking two parking spaces. So many other options 1 0 Absolutely! We need decent access via car to these businesses. 2 0 Yes, currently this alleyway has become a nightmare for the traffic that would normally be using and parking on Laurel. We need to get back to rational access on Laurel. End the Laurel closure now.
31 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1355
I would like to see the street revert to pre‐pandemic parking and car access. I note that businesses that are heavily trafficked‐ UPS store, BowWow, etc ‐ are nightmares of parking mess in the alley behind. Showing there is demand for parking and car access it is just currently being pushed into space it should not be.

I’m also not a fan of the idea of a massive giveaway of public space to restaurants.

These businesses should need to pay for their space like all the other businesses. 937
I agree there needs to be a three way stop sign here. 2 0 South of Laurel is very dark at night. Would like to see more street lightning and public parkings 20 1
I understand there are discussions with many ideas about keeping the two blocks of Laurel closed indefinitely. I personally like the way it is now, but can understand the issues with parking and traffic.  In Palm Desert, CA along their main business street, EV Courtesy Carts have offered free rides to shoppers. I see  a similar program on Laurel St. In San Carlos. These Carts can transport shoppers from parking areas to shops from Holly St. to Eaton establishing a business street connection.
57 The customers would likely favor the current situation. But what about the merchants ? Most or all other cities have restaurant expansions and keep the street OPEN! Why can’t San Carlos?
If the expansions are too big, the make the smaller or take them out. 35 This intersection is dangerous to traverse on bike or foot due to cars parked on Olive making it difficult for people to see what's coming. Please consider safety improvements to make it easier to walk or bike downtown here. 81 The intersection at Laurel & Brittan does not pick up when a bike is waiting ‐ the light never changes unless a car comes up behind to trigger the lights 10 1 Pedestrians and cars are forced to share this space with no separation, and it's unpleasant to walk here 80
Please consider allowing bicycles to traverse this block at low speed rather than forcing them to walk. People on bikes also appreciate having a space that is protected from cars.
76 Can you please add some carshare spots to this structure? This would be a great amenity to help the public parking areas to serve the people who live within walking distance, instead of just the people who drive downtown to visit. 50 The bike racks turn two parking spots into six. 1 1
Please bolt down the bike racks ‐ I don't trust a rack that isn't properly secured! 5 0 +1 on this request. Also ‐ I'd appreciate if pedestrians were better protected when crossing by the traffic signals ‐ quite frequently I see conflicts between people crossing and people turning right from ECR onto Holly on the Eastern corner. 50 Better monitor the public parking in the alleyways.  Many employees are parking there at peak times.  Would be great to add some 15min food pick up spots. 90 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1356
One way street loop! ties in with alleys to the west. Super cool idea. 2 0 Bike lanes should relate to what is happening with ECR bike lane project in Redwood City. See if we can do it better :) 40
Totally build a parking structure here with new development. 5 1 parking structure 7 0
Parking structure 5 1
maybe bypass all of Laurel st with the alleys. 2 0
maybe bypass all of Laurel st with the alleys. 2 1
Does this become the bypass road for Laurel to maintain the "street plaza"? 2 0 Create ECR safe crossing 4 1
Create ECR safe crossing 4 1
Create ECR safe crossing 7 0
Create ECR safe crossing 3 0
Create ECR safe crossing 3 1
Intersection should be improved to make access to parking structure better. 5 0 Love Wheeler plaza parking. 4 0
Love the UPS store (AKA, Amazon return center). But, the parking back here is pretty terrible. 30
Any overpass would be required to be wheelchair accessible, The amount of space to build compliant ramps would be near impossible.  Look at the  length of the ramps on the new pedestrian overcrossing on 101 in Palo Alto.  It also makes it such a long walk that nobody would use it.
20 More mid‐street cross walks like this throughout the downtown district. 1 0 Make the intersection safer for pedestrians.

If we hope to add more living & work options on El Camino we need to make the paths that connect this space to downtown for people‐friendly.

Can we add a "pedestrian refuge," mid‐street to add more safety to the crossing? 13 0
I nearly never walk between El Camino and Laurel. The sidewalks on El Camino are not friendly on such a busy street, and also the streets connecting them are not friendly either. It’s like walking on the street next to the Home Depot parking lot:
it’s not friendly, inviting, interesting and could feel safer. 50 I love the more limited car access. The outdoor dining is great and certainly Town has made it look so nice too.

I am not sure what a solution is for non‐restaurants.  Thoughts on this: add more housing to the surrounding area so that there are more potential customers who are less interested in cars.  Make it easier to walk to this location from other more car‐friendly parking areas.  Encourage restaurants in certain locations and not in others. Allow cars in non‐restaurant areas?
32 I am not sure where a bridge or underpass would be appropriate here but further improvements to link downtown to this space would be fantastic.  I cross this space regularly and the improvements to the El Camino crossing are still needed, despite improvements that have already been made
00 I'd like to close Laurel Street between San Carlos avenue and Cherry.  It would make more of a downtown feel with two closed streets instead of one. 20 4

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1357
Though perhaps out of the scope of Laurel Street itself, I wish the area was more easily accessible by bikes. The painted bicycle gutters on San Carlos Avenue do not provide much safety for people accessing Laurel street from the western portion of the city.
17 1
I find Laurel street much more comfortable and attractive with reduced access for cars, and I hope it stays this way.
22 5
I would love to see a beautiful *shaded* pedestrian bridge—or a pedestrian underpass—to the train station. (Perhaps it leads to a coffee shop in the depot!) The street crossing at El Camino and San Carlos Ave is not safe; cars too often encroach on the crosswalk or hit the gas through red lights. Also, when you're on foot, it's frustrating to reach the intersection at the very beginning of a traffic light cycle and have to watch your somewhat‐infrequent train leave without you... 12 1
Again, all commentary seems so concerned with the restaurants being able to have their businesses function. Nothing about any of the other businesses on Laurel.
10 After the farmers market on Sunday, reopen the street for regular traffic. It makes no sense to keep it closed all day. 00
How are the parklets fair to ALL businesses? UPS store is moving to SC ave because it is been impossible for them.

Footwear etc. is struggling as a result. They cannot rent Chef Shop or the Laundromat next to Town because no one wants to go into business with a closed street.

The Panini business had a very difficult time finding someone to take over their location (now Tea Hut).
53 Move the bike rack(s) so they don't waste 2 spaces of the already limited parking spots.
12 4
Hard to walk the sidewalks with restaurant tables crowding the space. Give them more parklet space.
14 4
The parklets are great (please keep them!!), but move restaurant tables off sidewalks. Most sidewalks are single file walking, so not sure how anyone in a wheelchair is able to use the sidewalks.
16 6
Multi‐story parking with EV charging. Provide multiple parking structures off Laurel Street, to reduce or eliminate traffic on Laurel Street. 13 5

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1358
Allowed Uses
Comment Up Votes Down Votes
AlcaTTraz (The ATT Building) is likely the worst looking building in all of DT San Carlos. It would be a stretch, but one could reimagine a wonder youth/teen center here instead.
00 This site has been boarded up for a long time ‐ its not a great look coming into downtown. 10
agreed! 0 0
100% on this. This "back area" of Laurel could be so much better utilized. That use doesn't need to be just as a parking lot, but as more interesting crevices for businesses and even small homes/apartments 00 I am less concerned about banks wanting to be downtown than how banks use the space of downtown. This bank building (and parking lot) in particular consumes an incredible amount of space which could be so much better used in this location and in downtown in general. It's like a mini‐fortress that everyone scurries past, and few use. There are no windows, & no real life to it. Downtown should be vibrant & this takes up too much space & provides no vibrance. 00 With some of the best weather in the country, we absolutely need outdoor dining, with or without the pandemic! 00
Exactly. Existing businesses seem to be catering to a very limited clientele (pizza, wedding dresses, pool supplies...) so leveraging height would allow for more options to choose from.
00 We should consider if arbitrary resistance to taller buildings is serving the city. Does this make sense to limit how tall buildings are in the area? Places like City Center Bishop Ranch in San Ramon has an expansive 2 story shopping center with ample parking, and has attracted stores like Anthropologie, Equinox, Pottery Barn and Williams Sonoma. 00 Agreed. Bookshops and cafes really add to the culture of a city, and it currently feels San Carlos is lacking in these areas. The Reading Bug is a bookshop for kids and there are no cafes that are open after 3 pm in the vicinity.
10 Outdoor dining has been such a great development of Laurel Street. It has made the city feel so much more alive, interesting and vibrant.

Please keep the parklets and pedestrian street on Laurel. 41 Development on the empty lots next to the train station would be a nice addition allowing smaller shops to set up ? Strengthening the draw of the downtown district and a whole.
00 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1359
San Carlos losing the Reading Bug, a beloved community space, speaks to the larger issue of the City needing to step in to prevent landlords from raising rents to exorbitant prices...just to drive out well‐loved local stores to tear down the building and build multi‐story condos. (As is the case here.) First off, protect local businesses but also keep height limits at 1 story (except for existing buildings) to prevent this from happening in the future.
60 This is just not true. "Shopping in stores" would be less inviting because of the added hassle of not being able to park anywhere near the stores.

If I'm running into a bank or the post office for a 5‐minute errand why should I have to search for parking off street for 10 minutes and walk 5 more minutes?
10 Let's not turn Laurel Street into a giant shadow with tall buildings so close to the charming downtown. Keep the 1‐2 story heights of current buildings.
01 Yes to more attractive barriers! 0 0
Great idea and it's true that no one ever walks between Laurel and El Camino. Even closing it to cars and adding some grass, planter boxes, and a few benches to sit and enjoy a meal outside would be great. Don't need to necessarily build more with mixed‐use.
10 Agreed we don’t need so many banks on the Main Street. Versus more restaurants or retail stores
20 Taxpayers funded this, they expect to be able to access this facility on a weekend. 00
Why exactly should a "Small Town" build up "considerably" perhaps we enjoy our underdeveloped land that enables the vibration that makes the town what it is... How does it provide a direct benefit exactly? 00 The roads were designed for vehicles. Sidewalks were designed for pedestrians. Bicycles come second to all of this as to not interfere with either.
01 What does that even entail? What exactly does more visibility look like exactly? 00
Let’s put people over cars. Would you rather be in a parking lot, or dining al fresco? 00
I strongly support the street closure. It is a big draw to downtown and makes it a destination. It’s enjoyable to see the community out together and to see patrons enjoying our local restaurants. It’s lovely and feels safer. And for those fiscally concerned folks, more people eating and shopping in San Carlos means greater tax revenue, wealth, and return for the community.
02 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1360
ECR is the perfect place for higher density. San Carlos needs to meet state mandated housing requirements. Along a transit corridor with access to services and groceries is an ideal location for more multistory/multiunit housing. These should be mixed use with stores/restaurants on the first floor if possible. I’m sure many in the community would prefer density here rather than in the hills where things are inaccessible and traffic and pollution would build, or among the single family homes.
00 Perhaps not the full length of Laurel Street. Perhaps from San Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue. The full length might impact parking for the residents of the neighboring streets. We do have to think about parking for people with accessibility concerns also.
10 I love the street closure! Could we do brick or pavers to make it even more welcoming and attractive? 02
If a real estate office can occupy space on Laurel then so should a child care center.
00 LESS density along El Camino and Laurel. The thought of five or six story buildings in the downtown area is just insane.
14 If the street is to be kept closed, then the business owners should pay for the space they are using. If a restaurant is allowed to double their space because they can be in the street, then they should be paying a sizable amount to the city for that space.

And, it shouldn't be passed onto the building owners.
60 Multi‐story housing should be encouraged all along ECR where ever there is an alley behind to provide access to on‐site parking for residents and Laurel St. retail similar to Wheeler Plaza. The first floor on ECR may be retail, but given that physical retail is rapidly fading as a viable use, retail may not be the best use. If retail was removed, parking could be eliminated along ECR and protected bike lanes and wider sidewalks could be added while keeping ECR two traffic lanes each way.
41 The street closure area on Laurel shall be expanded from San Carlos Avenue to Arroyo. There is sufficient parking behind BofA, and in the parking garage. having car traffic on Laurel makes this a stressful area that is not inviting to linger, sit at restaurants or go shopping. Shopping in the Laurel street stores would be much more inviting if there weren't cars driving and parked everywhere.
83 Laurel Street should only be for pedestrians. No vehicle travel shall be allowed. 55
Tagging on, it's crazy that 24 Hour Fitness on Industrial (!) is the only "regular gym" in town.
00 Certain restaurants should not be allowed to sprawl left and right simply because they are flanked by non‐restaurants. It's unsightly and unfair to restaurants that do not have that luxury.
10 I live around the dog park. People allow their dogs to bark and it's nice to have a break from this. If the dogs weren't so loud I'd be in agreement
01 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1361
Fully agree with this 0 0
Why do we keep letting banks take up so much space downtown? We need a bakery, nice shops etc in the central part of Laurel ‐ not large banks that hardly anyone goes into.
80 I agree ‐ there are a lot of great restaurants on the street and they should be permitted to retain nice parklets like those on Laurel. It will help make the entry to the city more appealing.
00 Too much valuable space in central downtown is occupied by banks. We need more upscale retail options, similar to Palo Alto and Burlingame, to attract people to shop and dine locally.
84 I would love one or two more fitness options downtown in addition to the Yoga Center. Maybe pilates or an Orange Theory type place. 40 I think there is a war going on here that doesn't need to happen. I agree that Laurel street should remain closed, and believe that will have positive impacts to all businesses. Addressing some good points I saw, you could definitely charge restaurants for use of outdoor space, possible even charging them more rent than small businesses.

Downtown has slowly been shifting toward fancy restaurants and this could combat that.
00 It would be nice to have a coffee (and maybe book) shop that is open late. It would be a nice gathering spot and place for students to study, people to meet, etc. Currently the only places open at night are bars and nicer restaurants.
12 0
I want Laurel street reopened and object to the giveaway of public space to private restaurant businesses, to the exclusion of other businesses. Business diversity is a good thing.
42 If we are going to give away public space to private businesses, we need to dramatically raise the construction and design standards to better meet safety code and attractiveness standards. Get rid of ugly orange barriers. Enforce better architectural standards on the outdoor seating structures.
25 0
Right now this block is very lightly utilized. Mostly a parking lot and old cottage size buildings. Seems like this could be built up considerably.

Which would help to extend the downtown area and benefit the small businesses on these blocks .
17 3
Many small towns (and large) all over Europe and the East Coast of the US have these in place.  Having something fun/ useful off the beaten path would add a lot to our downtown.
10 Bring more visibility to the San Carlos Museum! 13 0 Creating a pedestrian only space is critical to not only attract people but to retain them so that they might linger longer adding to the vitality goal of the Downtown Plan. Sidewalk sitting for the restaurants though should have specific standards to maintain a  quality look and feel. With the roads closed to traffic, there would be plenty of room for people to walk by. SC has an opportunity to bring a unique feel to our downtown and great place to be ‐ a pedestrian only space will bring such! 42 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1362
More density! More height along El Camino ‐ make the most of adjacency to Caltrain. 90
+1 for more housing. +1 for adding it in a way that enhances connections from ECR to Laurel. 10
I could imagine this section being 'Bonus Downtown' ‐ more shops, more restaurants at ground floor and a couple of floors of housing or office above. Like the alley ways in Melbourne, Australia where you slip down a narrow alley, beautifully painted, and find a secret strip of shops and restaurants.
10 0
Does this really have to be a bank? There has to be a higher and better use for this space. It kills this corner.
31 In addition to the other comment already made about making these Alleyways more interesting, mixed‐use, and adding a legitimate connection between Laurel and El Camino. (Image concept attached) 70 This is a "mobility/parking" comment too.  Provide a safe, and interesting path between El Camino and Laurel here.  That could be encouraging the addition of homes &/or mixed‐use where people who live here can have an off‐the‐main‐drag alleyway; but it could also be simply making this an interesting and safe path between El Camino businesses and Laurel businesses.  Otherwise no one EVER walks between the Laurel & El Camino businesses.
70 Could adding apartments and uses beyond parking to this space actually connect El Camino to Laurel while adding needed housing?   I suspect new use cases, like homes or other business types, could make this area more dynamic.
42 I don't mind the restaurants having an outdoor space, just leave the sidewalk open for people to walk by. 10
I unfortunately disagree with keeping the street closed and allowing only the restaurants to continue to be 2x larger than they have ever been. The restaurants pay rent for to their buildings and the space within a building. Prior to covid, it was required by the city to have a paid permit for any sidewalk seating.
54 Child care should be an allowable use downtown 7 0
Keep the on‐street dining on San Carlos Avenue, and make it safer with attractive, permanent barriers/planter boxes. These restaurants are highly visible and attract people to eat & shop in downtown San Carlos.
23 3
I also fully support keeping the street closed to cars. The parklets and closed street have been a delight. 46
Even if it is a limited time (e.g. 10 am ‐ 2 pm) as a starting point 1 1 Open the dog park on Sundays. 23 3

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1363
This is an extremely dangerous intersection. Cars speed down the hill on Alameda and crossing the intersection is dangerous. The cross walk has no lights which make walking/biking across risky. Children in the area use this street to cross as they walk to/from school. Can we put in a stop sign or at least a cross walk with lights (like on Brittan and Woodland) to improve safety? As it stands I have my teenage driver avoid the intersection and drive all the way to Eaton from our house for safety.
10 I fully support keeping the street closed to cars and allowing for restaurants to expand dining to outside. When done well, the restaurants have decorated/enclosed the area to make it feel welcoming and it allows for additional dining space and less crowded areas.
46 7

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1364
Gathering Spaces
Comment Up Votes Down Votes
Save the bug! The reading bug has been a gathering place for children for so many years. The bookstore is a key part of what makes San Carlos special to everyone but especially families!
00 Convert this to a parklet and Pedestrian entrance to Laurel, from the public parking here. 00
Agreed 100%! I'd strongly encourage a modular pump track or some kind of half pipe or roller skating space for fun and movement and low risk challenge all at the same time. See pump track options here:
https://www.parkitect.ch/blog/what‐is‐a‐pumptrack
00 Agree, and revisioning Laurel with public seating and green spaces would be a great way to make this a permanent solution. 00
Adding another outdoor gathering space like this one somewhere else in the downtown area would be a big plus! 00
I like the idea of incorporating a slow speed bicycle path through downtown. Not something someone can race down, but having bikes go through at slow speeds adds a charm and vibrancy/energy that both the bicyclists and the people walking on the street can appreciate. There's an invigorating aspect to promoting low‐speed, pedestrian friendly bicycling.

Essentially bike paths that are designed to be 'traffic calmed'... 00 Yes please! With all the newer condo developments downtown we need more human park and garden space.
10 Would like to see this activated as Public Gathering, Music, Green space, Tables Chairs Umbrellas 00
The folks @ the reading bug have expressed that they have sought support from the city and have had minimal assistance to ensure they can find a way to stay downtown. I have yet to meet anyone who doesn't want them to stay. How can the city help both this particular business not only stay but thrive, and in doing so help other similar businesses? 20 This sounds a bit extreme but the Reading Bug
Is one of the reasons I wanted to move to San Carlos. It’s one of the few independent bookstores on the peninsula and a community hub for all. we must protect it!
10 Agreed, there are not enough lower‐cost food options for teenagers. You used to be able to get a slice of pizza at Nino’s but most restaurants on Laurel are too pricey for teenagers.
00 Yes, I agree! And if every person on Nextdoor who complains about "what's happening to today's kids" and wishes there was more for them to do at night other than messing around read this...you'd have about 1,000 more likes...
30 Build a community center with meeting spaces for community groups, childcare; an event space for performances; a fitness center with a pool 82

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1365
Cafes exist off of a short walk to Laurel. Think of it as a brief exercise and a trip to support a local business within the business zoning of the local.

Two Birds, One Stone.
10 People gather and sit here now? As of when exactly?
Who is visiting San Carlos in the evening that is not here typically during the weekday or weekend?
Do you not receive cellular service?
Are you unaware of programs that will provide heavily discounted/free cellular service to you if you are unable to afford it? You can rent a portable modem/router from the library and take with you so that you do not penetrate our San Mateo County Library System, FYI. 00 Tea garden... where are those predominately located. How many Tea Gardens are present in the USA as of 2000 compared to 2020. How much space would be required and who would foot the bill. Is this really a good repurposing of precious finite land? What tea leaves would we grow and who would harvest them? Where would the funds generate and go towards? Who would upkeep the land?
01 How about of Alameda de las Pulgas where the city will soon allow the removal of tons of land and over 100 live oak trees which have taken nearly a century each to reach full maturity? Plus no cell tower in the middle of it like in Burton park.
00 Lets not be like Redwood City and say that we did... 0 0 You purchased land immediately off of El Camino Real. If you were a local you would immediately realize that El Camino is never really quiet. You deserve exactly what you paid for — Long term instability due to inflation.

San Carlos and other cities in the peninsula are comprised from the city directly within the perimeter not the outskirts nor epicenter. Move elsewhere if you seek additional "Attention". Why would we want to hang out on your street when it is nothing but apartments?
01 We need more outdoors spaces for San Carlos' teenagers to hang out! Instead of punishing them for being outside late at night, we should create spaces for them in our downtown so they feel represented and have a place to hang out, but without disturbing nearby residents. Expand parks and leave them open until later, add more affordable restaurants that are open later, and close this entire stretch of Laurel off to cars to increase foot traffic
50 This intersection/corner is particularly cumbersome with the bank parking lot/driveway. Could be utilized as a creative gathering spot with the driveway closed and repurposed. A gathering space in photo. 10 I agree it is important to keep a bookstore in the community, ideally one that is for adults and children! 10

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1366
Absolutely! Folks who grew up in San Carlos remember a movie theatre in town. It would be wonderful to have bowling or a theatre or more family friendly activities
20 I’d love more benches and/or creative spaces for people to sit and eat or just hang out downtown. 13 0
the pedestrian space is GREAT and let's make it more beautiful... keep a walking and biking path down the middle that can be used by emergency vehicles as needed, but make it more Park‐like on either side and plant some trees
60 I agree. We need businesses that are great resources. We need to help the Reading Bug.
10 I agree 100%. We all benefit from such gathering places. 1 0 Good points! A plaza needs to be an open, public space. 0 0 Great idea. 0 0
I like public parks. I like these ideas. 1 0
Fun idea. 0 0
There used to be thriving butterfly plants here. I love the idea of a butterfly garden and miss that giant plant. This wall could also be the place of an inspiring mural.
30 I prefer the idea of expanding away from El Camino instead. If people turn onto San Carlos Avenue, they will find the delightful space. I like the added security of NOT extending to El Camino.
00 I like this idea.

I really value gathering places where people can be among trees/plants and have multiple seating options (rocks, turf, steps, benches). Central, comfortable gathering places increase sense of community. 10 I would also like this little park to be redesigned. I think removing that sculpture (of a metal person) would be great. It is not aesthetic nor is it meaningful. Remove that and create flow from the park to Laurel Street.

Add rocks to sit on, turf to sit on, benches to sit on. Plants and trees. If you do need public art, have diverse people involved to pick something better.
00 I like that idea. It could be an open space like a town square, where people can sit and gather. There are a variety of surfaces these days. A park‐like feel where people could sit on the "ground" and hang out a bit I love the central squares in some towns with businesses on the perimeter. Los Robles comes to mind.  Areas with trees, picnic tables, and benches are helpful for meeting places and gatherings. Helping people connect in public spaces creates the sense of community that is invaluable.
00 I agree about fun, safe places for teens to hang out and feel welcome. Old timey video arcade. Stinson Beach has a concrete ping pong table in a park. You can provide paddles/balls, have a check‐out system at the library, etc.  Things to do for teens.
10 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1367
I love the central squares in some towns with businesses on the perimeter. Los Robles comes to mind.  Areas with trees, picnic tables, and benches are helpful for meeting places and gatherings. Helping people connect in public spaces creates the sense of community that is invaluable.
10 Agreed. This park is too small for the number of dogs in our community.

There was a time when a section of Burton Park under the trees was fenced in for dogs. That seems like a great opportunity to evaluate 00 Like the idea of a meditation area, the other courtyard closer to the library may be an option, that area seems under utilized and the fountain no longer is filled. Perhaps replace that with a meditation maze? 00 The City of Menlo Park saved Kepler's Book, feel like we need to do the same and support the Reading Bug as it has been an anchor for San Carlos families and the community.
20 Why is it called Wheeler Plaza if it doesn’t have a plaza open to the public? A nice courtyard space with a fountain, trees and benches would have been nice. Can we incorporate that someplace in downtown? 30 Completely agree ‐ it is a wonderful part of our community! We can’t let it go.
20 Would love to see a cafe move into the ground floor of wheeler plaza, like cafe barrone in Menlo Park ‐ a casual spot to have a light meal and gather. 90 I love that there is a dog park, but can we also create another small park near downtown with flowers, trees and benches for people? Greening our community should be a priority.
81 Make the currently blocked stretch of laurel street to a walking area ‐ remove the asphalt. 82
Great idea. I believe there’s one at the new Atherton library 0 0 Could even be a coffee cart! 1 0
This should be a plaza or park. We need more public space in this town especially with population density increasing
10 I think that's a poor comparison because the Hillsdale mall is rather large and expansive. While I do absolutely advocate for expanding that park if Laurel street remains closed, if it doesn't, like many argue it shouldn't, then this would probably be an ill‐fated project.
00 Park with trees and outdoor seating would enhance the atmosphere.

Possibly public art/mural. Could be a stage area during festivals. 10 If this remains a parking lot, the traffic flow and signage need to be improved including one‐way signs in alley. 00
It would be fun if there was a public piano or keyboard for people to play.

It could probably go under a covered patio.
40 Could a portion of this space be used to build a serene space, like a tea garden, a meditation garden, or a labyrinth? 42

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1368
How about a cafe / coffee shop at the library? And some late night hours as well. 15 1
Would be good to utilize the underground parking for evening visitors to downtown.  Is that underground lot ever full? 10
Save The Bug! 3 0
Agree.  And presume this would / should be done with a pedestrian only section of Laurel Street.
00 What if the park extended all the way to El Camino, giving people a window into our beautiful downtown? You'd never know what is one street back, driving along ECR.
41 Need to find a space downtown for The Reading Bug since the landlord is demolishing building.  It is a key piece of our community and the downtown shopping experience with story times and author visits.  Have enjoyed their outdoor story times!  It would be a shame for the city to not assist a vital, community, family owned business.
33 1
Redevelop this mini park to spill out to Laurel st. Park is not well designed and has a lot of potential. Could be like the open space at Hillsdale mall by the Apple store.
22 2
I would really like to see some type of teen spaces! 6 1 Consider expanding Harrington park across the street to this space to make a larger gathering space.

I assume that would require the city purchasing this plot and possibly including the BofA building itself.  Encourage adjacent structures to orient towards the park and increase the height limits to make it a cozy space for gathering, concerts and activities.
12 1
It's likely that I may work from home forever.  It'd be great to have an open park space to occasionally work from.  I'd love for downtown to provide such spaces
10 Agreed.  I want to tell my kids so go here to hang out.  Having more for them here would be great.
20 If this could officially be designated to become a park then before the next tenant moves into the currently empty restaurant the future tenant could orient the storefront with the park in mind.  That would further “activate” the park.
20 let's have more gatherings in the City Hall / Dog Park area, similar to RWC and their Square
41 Yes, I echo this concern.  The teens need a spot to gather to foster friendships after school hours.  Outdoor and fun activities for young people that engage in fitness and artistic aspirations. 40 I agree! It'd also be great if the City offered free public wi‐fi outdoors (within a defined zone). 00
It would be great to have some shaded table/chair spaces that are independent of restaurant seating.
22 0
As a teen in San Carlos and a member of the Youth Advisory Council, it would be nice to see more things to do for high schoolers as there is really no dedicated events/space for us to hang out downtown.
19 0

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1369
There was talk at one time of this parking lot becoming a park. I think that would be lovely. 18 1
Many of us purchased our condos when this was off the the main part of downtown. Please maintain some type of quiet hours so we can sleep. 20 This far down doesn't get much attention or as much foot traffic, perhaps adding small parks/gathering spaces would draw more people. to this part of downtown.
35 1
Create more space here for people to gather and sit ‐ even give those working from home a new place for work for a few hours 12 1

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1370
Other Comments
Comment Up Votes Down Votes
Laurel behind Trader Joe’s is a disgrace—full of trash in the bushes, weeds, broken glass. Not sure what goes on there but SC needs to give it extra attention. I know you know what I’m talking about. 00 I see people going the wrong way down the one way all the time.

You should mark that with better signage.
00 We do not want to look like Redwood City with six story buildings.

Please look at Menlo Park for how nicely their El Camino project has been designed.
00 Like the idea of pop‐markets somewhere in San Carlos, but I wonder who owns this space in front of the Transit building?  Is it the city, or privately owned?
00 Given the vacancies of the ground floor commercial spaces at Wheeler Plaza, the Trestle development by the train station, 934 Laurel...a multistory building with retail/residential doesn't sound like a development concept that is working well in San Carlos.  Also the city needs to be very careful going forward to make certain that our sewers, drainage systems, water sources, etc. are adequate for additional developments.
00 Menlo Park is a good role model when looking to improve the El Camino Real in San Carlos.  Please look at the wonderful development this city has done between Valparaiso and Sand Hill Road on El Camino. Their ideas for height and design are tasteful and have class. No six story buildings please.
00 As a continuation of my comment to raise the good energy in downtown San Carlos, the downtown area needs to stay away from dark, dismal storefronts that are painted black, dark gray, brown.

These colors drag down the energy of a building and the success of the establishment.
00 Town and County Village at the corner of El Camino and the Embarcadero in Palo Alto had a "face lift" a few years ago, and the face lift has brought about a wonderful turn around in the prosperity of the shopping center.  I would suggest that San Carlos ask Town and Country Village for the name of their redesign consultant.  Perhaps it was a Feng Shui expert as the renewed success and the good energy this shopping center is truly wonderful. San Carlos needs to focus on raising the good energy. 00 I believe the flooding is a recurring issue.  If so, what are the proposed solutions?  What is the cost of infrastructure changes versus building requirement changes?  Has this issue been studied? 00 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1371
We should get rid of the height restrictions since it doesn't allow the density needed to reflect the community needs.  We need more housing and retail space in areas that  are close to transportation centers.  We can't go back to low maximum height building and more auto parking.  That will not work given our current needs.  It will stifle the growth we need to remain a diverse viable community in the future.
00 If revitalizing the space could be done without tearing down the building, that would be great.  In my head, the way to revitalize is to put in a new more inviting (less soviet‐style) building.  However, often the most unique ideas that really call out a "place" come from making something out of nothing.  Someone mentioned putting vendors on the street.  That's a great start and idea.
00 I agree with the general thrust of this comment.  It's a great local super market.  However the way the building is situated really detracts from downtown.  Bring it closer to the street, and it will probably become an even more beloved market as it will be more of a space for people and not just a market surrounded by a moat of cars.
00 Plenty of neighboring pharmacies in San Carlos… would be glad to see this space evolve somehow to accommodate more housing that is needed close to downtown.
00 great idea would help during the many festivals/events/farmers markets that happen downtown. Be great to have them as gender neutral and accessible to be inclusive of all needs.
00 A great point I miss Vanilla Moon Bakery that was downtown ages ago and nothing similar has come back since. Luckily lots of options close by in RWC or San Mateo.
00 Drivers that are unaware the stop signs are only on Walnut and stop while driving on Cherry cause traffic issues. 4 way stops are the norm for 99% of intersections. Why is this intersection different? 00 Please keep the small‐town feel of San Carlos intact by preserving local grocers such as Bianchini's. And keep building heights to what they are ‐ no need to build up, up, up on Laurel Street. 22 Keep parking here free! And same with Laurel St. 1 0 Glad to see neighbors attacking other neighbors for just throwing out an opinion. City of Good Living at its finest. 10

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1372
HELL NO. CVS Is a great resource, I obtain many health resources for my family members and disabled neighbor here by foot every other week. Removing this is going to divert customers to Walgreens (also off of Laurel) or CVS in Belmont. We just completed the new plaza across the street and not all spaces have been filled yet. I remember Safeway, if we could that would be great because they also have a pharmacy inside. Your plea for additional gentrification nonsense. 31 YES!!! IN FACT LETS STOP NEW DEVELOPMENTS ENTIRELY!!! CALIFORNIA, ESPECIALLY THE SF BAY AREA IS FULL TO THE BRIM.

MOVE TO IDAHO, NEBRASKA, SOUTH CAROLINA, NEW MEXICO,
ANYWHERE BUT HERE!!!! This is 100% Genuine) MAX HEIGHT
SHOULD BE TWO STORIES 10FT CEILINGS MAX.
02 Really... daily? Such exaggeration is still jarring even in the current age we all live in. I would say far less then considering I live a block away. Look, wave, cross. They teach it to school children if you were not aware I am sure you could find something on YouTube. If not, you could probably find a reflective set of pants and jacket on Amazon. Just use your smartphone thingamajig gadget gizmo and it will get you there; SAFELY!
02 Really... daily? Such exaggeration is still jarring even in the current age we all live in. I would say far less then considering I live a block away. Look, wave, cross. They teach it to school children if you were not aware I am sure you could find something on YouTube. If not, you could probably find a reflective set of pants and jacket on Amazon. Just use your smartphone thingamajig gadget gizmo and it will get you there; SAFELY!
01 No you do not know how this area has been functional for many decades. Nonsensical, irrelevant feedback here. What stores do you propose will fill the void of former retailers? What "flow" are you referencing of which you seems so falsely knowledgeable about? 01 This is not genuine conversation, you people seek to undermine San Carlos and steer the narrative towards more housing/development that is simply not sustainable for the long term health of our community. You fraud.
00 This is not genuine conversation, you people seek to undermine San Carlos and steer the narrative towards more housing/development that is simply not sustainable for the long term health of our community. You fraud.
00 This is not genuine conversation, you people seek to undermine San Carlos and steer the narrative towards more housing/development that is simply not sustainable for the long term health of our community. You fraud.
00 Just because we can does not mean we should. 0 0

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1373
Why? 0 0
These are not organic, why should this section also be
incorporated? 00
*DECORATIONS 0 0
Google Maps... That says it all... Why should it continue past this intersection? Has it historically continued past this intersection? IF not, why NOT? The "BIG" park has a BIG CELL TOWER IN THE MIDDLE OF IT. Is that a nice family attraction? The streets surrounding it see tremendous traffic you are simply naive to. You walk to a park with the expectation that your arrival will be celebrated...? Why would the nature reserve ever celebrate you(r arrival)??? Who will fund these decoratinos??
01 The outsider is shocked by this fact although you do not hear such outrage from residents who have lived here their entire lives. I grew up across Walnut Street and never once have I felt insecure about crossing the street or "PUSHED" by another vehicle or pedestrian.

TOTAL BS FROM AN OUTSIDER.
01 More traffic = More of a carbon footprint. Let nature retake our space instead of people traveling into unknown territory to purchase crepes, sandwiches, burgers, etc. What separates an Asian Grocery Store from a "Traditional" Grocery Store?
00 Why exactly do we "NEED" to see such options? so this area "NEEDS" people when historically it hasn't seen such trends? Cafes offering what specifically that would truly "ENRICH" this area?" Boba Shops??? Money Laundering, perhaps? Do you really take us for such fools?
01 Counseling is psychobabble meant to dissuade truth. 0 0 The rains from flooding. Let me guess... CLIMATE CHANGE!?!?!? Flooding happens due to the inability of local government to act swiftly primarily caused by nepotism.
00 Quiet Exists for those in quiet areas. If you seek industrialization say goodbye to this. Make a choice already. 00
Why not confuse development all the way to Eaton. There are already some successful restaurants and shops and linking the area would make a lot of sense and give people in WO more ability to visit places on foot.
31 I would love to see this part of Laurel street developed to have more shops and restaurants! 20
We need to limit the height on new buildings. The recently built apartments and condos are too big. It is nice to have sun on Laurel Street, but if we keep building up, we will shade Laurel, and become like downtown San Mateo , and Redwood City. I like it now. Do not allow new building to ruin it
42 Walnut is way too narrow, it’ gets backed up and it’s dangerous. It should be one way.
22 Yes, please improve our infrastructure. We should not have flooded streets and freeways. 10

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1374
Please consider speed bumps near crosswalks. 0 0
This used to be a movie theatre. For those who don't like the building, where do you think the SamTrans offices should be go? 00 This used to be a Safeway. Now two CVSs in San Carlos and two Safeways in Belmont. The parking lot is required for this amount of shopping. I'd like this to be a grocery store again.
20 There seem to be enough restaurants.I would like some useful stores like an Ace Hardware, a fine bakery which bakes bread, an Asian grocery store, fruit and vegetable market (street market is nice but it is not there every day). The south of Laurel is just a bunch of run down beauty and. Nail salons.
10 Smoking should be banned near dining establishments and shops.

Nothing can ruin a meal faster than a cigarette. Well, perfume can as well but I'm not going there.
91 Shouldn't the plan include the areas down to Eaton Avenue as well? 0 0 Open the street back up. It's crazy that it's still closed. 2 15 +1 we need more coffee shops and bakeries which attract regular customers. Restaurants are great but people visit coffee shops a lot more frequently. Also we don’t have a good bakery in San Carlos. 20 The El Camino and Laurel Street businesses in this area really suffered in the rains from flooding. Better drainage needs to happen. One Life Counseling office was destroyed and their insurance doesn't cover it, and now they can't do their valuable food distribution,
60 The train horns are very loud, especially at night. We should declare San Carlos a "Quiet Zone", like other cities did on the Peninsula. https://www.ci.atherton.ca.us/Faq.aspx?TID=24,
https://sanjosespotlight.com/san‐jose‐residents‐clamor‐for‐a‐good‐ nights‐sleep‐japantown‐warm‐springs‐rail‐corridor‐union‐pacific‐ railroad‐train‐quiet‐zone/
https://abc7news.com/sj‐train‐horns‐partial‐quiet‐zone‐warm‐ springs‐union‐pacific‐railroad‐corridor‐montgomery‐and‐horning‐ streets‐noise/11839739/
10 The plaza could host pop up markets, food carts, Etsy‐type/art and wine style vendors on a rotating basis, open the doors for public restrooms. Agree it is under utilized area but could be brought back to life without a huge amount of work.
20 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1375
Having Laurel street close these past few years have been so wonderful. My family and I stroll, and shop, a lot more on Laurel street because of the walkability and safety the street closure provides. It's great to see so many people out and about on the street. I hope the closure continues indefinitely.
21 Why not include all of Laurel St.? 5 0
General comment ‐ for all of San Carlos, especially downtown ‐ need to increase pedestrian safety. I am shocked there are not more accidents. As a resident of Walnut street and often walk downtown I cannot go a day without being "pushed" thru the crosswalk by a car.
71 Need safer pedestrian crossing at this intersection. Especially so close to the schools. Children come down School St after school and run across this intersection.
30 Need this to be a four way stop and better lights at night. Very dangerous. 41
Would love to add more restaurants (of various types ‐ we need more options) and quality retail to this part of downtown to draw people in. Additional cafes would also be nice ‐ not just Starbucks and Peet’s.
92 This building is an eyesore. Best would be if it could be torn down and start from scratch. In its current state it has zero curbside appeal.
00 I knew it would be complicated but just while we are all brainstorming thought I would throw it out there. Definitely would need to be done in sections but the payoff would be well worth it to integrate into the new downtown fabric
31 Looks like crews are working on the spaces now. Probably Covid delays but things look to be coming soon.
00 I love this idea but... cost. The parking spaces there are almost always full, which means they are needed. I think an alternative to completely redeveloping the land is to move the parking back onto an alley (which you could refurbish in the process), and then add a new building or park in the space previously occupied by parking. 31 Redevelop CVS into a multistory building to include retail on the ground level and residences above with parking lot underground. So much wasted space here
34 The last time I was at the post office the automated machine was broken and vomit was in the center of the floor. Please connect with the Post office to remedy and keep better cleaning standards 53 Attract other popular restaurants like the Refuge to help the downtown expand to these smaller foot traffic areas.
13 2
Disrupts the flow of Laurel street having this parking and drive thru.

Consider redevelopment of bank and parking lot of sushi to new retail storefronts to keep downtown flowing
85 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1376
We love Bianchinis and frequent a few times a week but it definitely feels a bit dates at times. Would the city be willing to give tax benefits to redevelop the land with multiple stories with the ground floor as a grocery tenant and allow residences/offices above. Below level parking garage would be encouraged. Would eliminate the dead walking space and keep downtown from having all the gaps for parking.
10 8
I agree. This should probably be a 4 way stop. 2 0
The 600 block of Laurel Street and all of San Carlos Avenue needs to get the street parking back.

The temporary park‐lets are unsightly, not up to code and only supporting restaurants.

Keep the 700 block pedestrian and return the rest of the street parking back to the way it was.
433
Why are they empty? If commercial on the first floor and residential on top is the new desired model, you have to wonder if that's working.
21 Please add public restrooms somewhere more than at the ACC/Library/City Hall area. Ideas: city lot near Wheeler Plaza, city park on Laurel, CalTrain station, somewhere between Olive and Brittan Ave.
11 2
This is a very dangerous intersection with near‐accidents almost daily (both pedestrian and with cars.) Please look into how it can be reconfigured to improve safety.
81 Why isn't Howard Avenue included? This makes no sense. 3 1 What is the justification for starting/stopping at Greenwood Avenue? That makes no sense, and, at the very least, it should include through Howard Avenue!
41 Wish this wasn't a bank in an 80's building. 1 1
Downtown officially dies right here. I Would love to see it continue past this intersection.

Part of it is that only 1 restaurant has anything
Outdoors. The other 3 corner businesses are pretty dead to the outside space.

This is also a key path to Burton park. Would love to See some celebration of taking a nice walk/bike to the big park.  Decorate the intersection as a sort of gateway towards Burton.
21 3
Making this fix could also help make the stores across the street more enticing for tenants
30 The SamTrans building is such an “drive‐to—work‐hide‐in‐the‐ fortress‐office design.  Even with small first floor businesses and ample sidewalk space in this fortress of a building it is such an I inviting space for human beings.  Can something be done here to encourage more public use of this space?   It’s a great location that people just quickly walk past.
90 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1377
The ground commercial spaces have been empty for quite a while now.  We need to rent these out since empty storefronts detract from the downtown revitalization.
10 0
Would love to see the "overall plan" contain ideas about how to strengthen links between downtown core, mid Laurel and south Laurel. A stronger visual continuity of street trees, etc would encourage more pedestrian traffic along the entire stretch. 13 1
This block the street is very dirty.  Suggest to have a power wash in the 600 ‐ 700 block.  Due to drought we lack mother nature to help wash the streets.
30 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1378
Downtown Community Workshop #1
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1379
Downtown Community Workshop #1
August 31, 2022
At this virtual community meeting, there were approximately 150 community members including City staff and consultants in attendance. The meeting began with a welcome from Mayor Sara McDowell and an introduction of the City staff and consulting team working on the Specific Plan project.

The workshop included a brief presentation on what the Downtown Specific Plan will cover, observations & objectives, and existing conditions of the study area. In addition, attendees participated in an interactive exercise using a real-time polling tool called “Sli.do” to provide responses to a series of questions posed by the project team. The meeting ended with optional break-out rooms where participants could share comments and ask questions.

Meeting Materials:
• Presentation
• Meeting Chat Transcript
• Interactive Poll #1 Results Summary
• Breakout Room Notes

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1380
Virtual Community Workshop #1
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1381
Al Savay, AICP
Community & Economic Development Director
City of San Carlos
Lisa Porras, AICP
Planning Manager, Advance Planning
City of San Carlos
Jami Williams, CNU-A
Principal, RRM Design Group
Mayor Sara McDowell
City of San Carlos
Abraham Sheppard
Urban Designer, RRM Design Group
Tonight’s Workshop Team
Rachel Raynor
Associate Planner, RRM Design Group

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1382
Welcome DTAC Meeting Agenda – thanks for joining us!
❖ This meeting is being recorded.
o The recording will be available afterwards (on the project website – sancarlosdowntownplan.com).
❖ Your microphones will be muted during the presentation ❖ Please send questions or comments into the chat feature (overviewed on next slide)
Virtual Meeting Etiquette

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1383
Turn video on
or off
Mute or unmute
microphone
Toggle between speaker
& gallery view by clicking
on these icons
Along the bottom of your screen,
you will see this toolbar of buttons:

At the top right corner of your
screen, you will see these options:

Zoom Meeting Features
Chat will only be visible by the meeting
hosts ~ please send questions or
comments into the chat
A Q & A segment is included after the
presentation

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1384
DTAC Meeting Agenda
❖ Specific Plan Overview
❖ Interactive Poll
❖ Additional Ways to Get Involved
❖ Optional Breakout Rooms
Workshop Agenda

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1385
Downtown Specific Plan Area
Need this slide? – if yes, insert simple aerial map

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1386
Downtown Specific Plan Team

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1387
Specific Plan Overview

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1388
What is a Specific Plan? DTAC Meeting Agenda
General Plan
❖ City’s long-term vision for
the future
❖ Policy goals and objectives
to guide its physical
development
Zoning Code
❖ Establishes land uses and
development standards
❖ Regulates private
development
Specific Plan
❖ Provides a vision and direction for
a specific geographic area
❖ Must be consistent with
General Plan
❖ Provides a customized regulatory
framework
❖ Takes precedence over standards
set by the Zoning Code
❖ Is evaluated for environmental
impacts and establishes
environmental clearance
General Plan
Zoning Code
Specific
Plan

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1389
What will the Downtown Specific Plan do? DTAC Meeting Agenda A 20-year policy document that will:
❖ Establish a vision for the future of Downtown
❖ Shape the look, feel, and function of Downtown
❖ Define the desired balance of land uses
❖ Increase the economic vitality of Downtown businesses ❖ Establish building design criteria and maximum height limits ❖ Exploring whether to keep Laurel Street closed to automobiles and traffic

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1390
What will the Downtown Specific Plan do? DTAC Meeting Agenda 20-year policy document that will:
❖ Enliven the existing public spaces and identify
future community gathering spaces
❖ Improve walking, bicycling, and driving in
Downtown
❖ Increase connections from Downtown to
surrounding neighborhoods and destinations
❖ Establish a road map for implementation
❖ Include an Environmental Impact Report and
analysis

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1391
What will the Specific Plan NOT do? DTAC Meeting Agenda ❖ This is not a specific development project
❖ It is a guide to establish how privately led
development projects can and cannot be designed
❖ It will not enact eminent domain on private property

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1392
Objectives & Observations

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1393
Understanding the Specific Plan Area DTAC Meeting Agenda ❖ City-led walking tour
❖ Background and existing policy document review
❖ Site analysis
❖ Market analysis
❖ High level historic character and observations
❖ Parking and mobility analysis
❖ Infrastructure analysis
❖ City Council, Stakeholder, and Focus Group
Meetings, DTAC meetings, Community Input
Land Uses &
Development Regulations
Mobility
Placemaking
Infrastructure

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1394
Existing Conditions DTAC Meeting Agenda – Land Uses

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1395
DTSP Objectives DTAC Meeting Agenda – Land Uses
❖ Promote a “sense of place” and identity
❖ Design parameters, guidelines and standards
that promote quality development
❖ Establish zoning and land use policies that
promote a vibrant downtown
❖ Evaluate City’s Formula Retail ordinance
❖ Support small businesses

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1396
Existing Conditions DTAC Meeting Agenda – Downtown Economy Strengths
• Resident income levels
• Strong per capita retail sales
• Proximity to major employment areas
• Potential for new housing to accommodate
Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA)
Weaknesses
• “Leakage” in several key retail categories
• Limited land available (and smaller,
fragmented parcels)
• “Disconnect” for business outside of Laurel
core
Opportunities
• Recapture of leakage in key categories
(e.g., restaurants and grocery)
• Build on success of recent, higher-density
residential projects
• Leverage East Side Innovation District
• Maintain Laurel Street closure (TBD)
Threats
• Global changes in retail
• Compatibility of density with adjacent
neighborhoods
• Competition from neighboring downtowns

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1397
Existing Conditions DTAC Meeting Agenda – Placemaking

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1398
DTSP Objectives DTAC Meeting Agenda – Placemaking
❖ Promote a walkable and livable environment
with unifying streetscape character
❖ Create opportunities for outdoor dining,
parklets, and downtown events
❖ Consider the permanent Laurel Street
closure
❖ Implement the Citywide Wayfinding Project
❖ Laurel parking area conversion to a plaza
❖ Reimagine Harrington Park

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1399
Existing Conditions - Mobility
Walkable Street Network
in the Downtown Core Well Connected to Transit
Some Challenging Street Environments

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1400
Existing Conditions DTAC Meeting Agenda – Parking & Alleys Parking options include on-street spaces as well as public and private lots and garages Alleys serve many functions including circulation, parking, business access, loading and trash

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1401
DTSP Objectives DTAC Meeting Agenda – Mobility
❖ Improve walkability and bicycle connections
and facilities
❖ Coordinate parking management
❖ Enhance mobility and manage congestion
❖ Improve alley access and utilization

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1402
Rethinking Alleys DTAC Meeting Agenda

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1403
DTAC Meeting Agenda Participate in a Live Poll on Slido.com OPTION 2:

Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
OPTION 1:

Join via web browser by going to slido.com
and typing in the event passcode: 3606582
Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
There are two ways to join:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1404
Clarifying Questions from the Chat DTAC Meeting Agenda

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1405
We want to hear from you…

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1406
DTAC Meeting Agenda Thanks for being part of the conversation! ❖ Visit the project website sancarlosdowntownplan.com
❖ Drop a comment/suggestion on the project’s online
interactive map
❖ Online Interactive Mapping Activity Self-Guided Tour
❖ Online Questionnaires (coming soon!)
❖ Community Workshops and Other Events
❖ Downtown Advisory Committee Meetings
❖ Planning Commission, City Council and Other City
Committees - Study Sessions and Formal Hearings
❖ Contact Us: [email protected]

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1407
Downtown Specific Plan Website DTAC Meeting Agenda
❖ Sign up for noticing of events
❖ DTSP updates and background info
❖ More ways to participate
❖ Upcoming milestones and events
sancarlosdowntownplan.com

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1408
Interactive Map DTAC Meeting Agenda
❖ Share your ideas,
suggestions and
comments
❖ View entries from
other community
members
Access the map from the project website:
sancarlosdowntownplan.com

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1409
Optional DTAC Meeting Agenda Breakout Room Discussions
Would you like to share additional thoughts?
❖ Please remain in the Zoom meeting and our team will send you to a breakout room
❖ Please send questions to: [email protected] ❖ Breakout rooms are not recorded
❖ You will be able to turn on your camera and request to be unmuted

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1410
sancarlosdowntownplan.com
Thanks for participating!
Contact Us: [email protected]

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1411
17:49:30 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Waiting Room Participants:

Hello, We will start the meeting shortly. thank you for attending! 18:17:03 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Jeffrey Sobrato(Direct Message):
can you please mute yourself
18:22:54 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:

Hello! Please write any questions in this chat feature and please send them to all meeting hosts / co-hosts. Thank you!
18:28:10 From Lena's iPad to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Hi Rachel, All is not an option,
18:28:32 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Lena's iPad(Direct Message):
can you try it now?
18:28:46 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Lena's iPad(Direct Message):
i just updated the settings
18:29:07 From Lena's iPad to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Yes, it is to EVERYONE…participants and hosts.
18:29:13 From Caroline Bauhaus to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Thanks for this overview. How is the team integrating best practices/examining model cities regarding “people first” city design? In my 30 years in SC most conversations about downtown focus on cars. Focusing on people and increasing foot traffic in the downtown will benefit our businesses
18:29:24 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Lena's iPad(Direct Message):
wonderful.
18:29:28 From Karen Molinari, HCT, (She/her) to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Alleys can be used for bicycling traffic with cars moved behind those in parking lots.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1412
18:29:46 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Caroline Bauhaus(Direct Message):
caroline can you send that to everyone
18:30:12 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Karen Molinari, HCT, (She/her)(Direct Message):
can you send that to everyone?
18:30:45 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
https://www.slido.com/
18:30:52 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
3606582
18:30:53 From Mary Bates to Everyone:

Are there any decisions made on the permanent closure of Laurel street? 18:32:11 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

I cn
18:32:30 From Richard Domaszewicz to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Concerned about the retail stores that have lost customers due to the street closure, what are the plans to help them?
18:32:53 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

I can't get to my browser while on Zoom! Now what?
18:32:54 From mariashaldybin to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

What happens in San Carlos, stays in San Carlos
18:33:48 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

How do I get to my browser?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1413
18:34:04 From Samina Ginwalla (she/her) to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Just to confirm, if you are on DTAC we can’t poll right? 18:34:30 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Explain jhow to open a new tab===on a mac?
18:35:11 From Caroline Bauhaus to Everyone:

Thanks for the overview. How is the team integrating best practices/examining model cities regarding “people first” city design? In my 30 years in SC most conversations about downtown focus on cars. A focus on people and increasing foot traffic in the downtown will benefit our businesses
18:35:22 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
how many are in the workshop
18:35:34 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Nancy Oliver(Direct Message):
control T for a new tab
18:36:00 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Jami Williams, RRM Design Group(Direct Message):
149
18:36:08 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
scroll downt please
18:36:28 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

If folks are still stuck using the poll feature, perhaps you can invite folks to enter their answer in the Chat window to ensure you are capturing feedback. 18:36:42 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Control T does nothing! so now what?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1414
18:36:54 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
can i jump in with a comment?
18:36:55 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

Past, present, or future?
18:37:04 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Jami Williams, RRM Design Group(Direct Message):
yes!
18:37:32 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Answer to question—not easy to get to.
18:39:14 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Historical information.
18:39:27 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Better handicapped parking close in.
18:39:47 From Josh Wallace to Everyone:
…or saving historic building
18:40:24 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Go to SC—none pf the above!
18:40:37 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

None of the above.
18:41:12 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Can't afford to eat out very much!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1415
18:41:24 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Father of San Carlos.
18:42:33 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Retail, but not more restaurants.
18:44:00 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Mixed use with retail.
18:44:35 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

I wish we had none of the above or open comment fields
18:44:39 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
1925
18:44:50 From hanneh vandermeyden to Everyone:
what are you doing to bring technology businesses to San Carlos 18:45:24 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
i message him that too :) nice
18:45:45 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Walk with cane. Need close-in parking.
18:46:32 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Nancy Oliver(Direct Message):
thank you appreciate you sharing!
18:46:38 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Improved sidewalks and closer parking.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1416
18:47:32 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

You forgot about colose in parking.
18:47:48 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
one half to one block.
18:49:01 From Pam Leffler to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

I'm sure you are aware that many cities are re-envisioning their downtowns following the changes brought by the pandemic. I wanted to mention that Santa Barbara is currently also working with consultants to remake their downtown. It might be interesting for the team to check in to see if there are any innovative ideas that can be considered for inspiration in San Carlos! Realizing of course that the styles of these two cities are distinct. 18:49:05 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Private parking (bank), or street parking if available near my destination 18:49:38 From Maggie to Everyone:

I'm not clear if the SamTrans is public parking?
18:49:57 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Redwood City
18:50:44 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
another comment that was messaged directly 'Concerned about the retail stores that have lost customers due to the street closure, what are the plans to help them?' 18:50:57 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
here is another one 'I'm sure you are aware that many cities are re-envisioning their downtowns following the changes brought by the pandemic. I wanted to mention that Santa Barbara is currently also working with consultants to remake their downtown. It might be interesting for the team to check in to see if there are any innovative ideas that can be considered for inspiration in San Carlos! Realizing of course that the styles of these two cities are distinct.'

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1417
18:52:15 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Stanford U.
18:53:22 From Mike to Everyone:

For improvements to downtown and alleys why haven’t the choices of traffic and parking been provided. These are big issues. Have to find a way to make cars work and the alleys may be a viable option since they already handle deliveries etc 18:54:41 From Kristen Clements (she/her) to Everyone:
slido was fun - i liked it
18:55:15 From Monette's iPad to Everyone:

Slide was easy to use.
18:55:19 From Mark Stieglitz to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
slido was great, easy!
18:55:46 From Helen Mickiewicz to Everyone:

What is the plan for the Depot building? There was a restaurant there before The Trestle was built, but the city eliminated the parking lot for the location, so does the city envision another business locating there? If not, what's the plan? 18:56:28 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

Thank you for answering my question.
18:56:46 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

That building's leasing is covered by Caltrain.
18:57:32 From Josh Wallace to Everyone:

Please consider pro-actively protecting the few “historic” buildings/places we have. 18:57:37 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

Their urgency to get such buildings leased is...not as urgent as a private landlord's urgency might be. I'm friends with the leasing agent that typically covers that type of building lease for Caltrain. I'll email him now.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1418
18:57:53 From Wayne Macktinger to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Need to excuse myself now. I have a keen knowledge of the retail real estate space.

Available to discuss how I may able to “give back' to SC, as a long term resident here. Feel free to reach out to me @ 650-595-4300. W. Macktinger
18:57:55 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

The depot bui;ding was unfortunately almost eliminated from view with the encroachmenbt of th apartment buildings--too close to the depot. And yes, it eliminaged the use of the building as a restaurant.
18:58:01 From Pranita Venkatesh to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Polling was insightful and the results are immediate. Well done 18:58:49 From Mark Stieglitz to Everyone:

Slido was great, easy!
18:58:52 From Vivienne Kelvin - Vabrato to Everyone:

What's happening to the Depot Café?
18:59:27 From Elizabeth Chun to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

But Sam Tran has all these signs on the top floor that says no parking. 18:59:30 From Helen Mickiewicz to Everyone:

Thanks for that answer.
18:59:41 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

An area some folks may have forgotten about is Santana Row. If we are looking at generating revenue and having cozy sitting areas with light live music, remember Santana Jazz?, then Santana Row is a great model!
18:59:46 From Allison Chang to Everyone:

Depot could be a good spot for the museum…
18:59:52 From Mike to Everyone:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1419
I posted a question earlier about cars and traffic and parking. What is the plan for improving car and parking for downtown incl use of alley space 18:59:56 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

I want to know if the city and the consultants are paying attention to our historic sites within the area being studied! There have been some problems with unauthorized changes to some buildings without follow-up from the city.
19:00:15 From Henry Eng to Everyone:
in the review of permanent street closure, is the plan going to look beyond the 700 block to include the 600 block and part of San Carlos Avenue?
19:00:45 From Mila Paul to Everyone:

Will Cal Train Parking be free of charge in the evenings and on weekends? 19:00:47 From Vivienne Kelvin - Vabrato to Everyone:

Can you pave Laurel Steet like we have in all major cities in Europe (for years) 19:00:58 From Mike to Everyone:

Please do NOT compare this to Santana Row. Some of that thinking went into the commercial space at the Caltrain Depot and it is not the right fit 19:03:57 From Ariela St Pierre to Everyone:

Why will it take so long to develop the plan?
19:03:59 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
here is the Downtown Specific Plan project website
https://www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com/
19:04:01 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

There are two new restaurants opening in the new construction portion of the "Trestle" project: 1) Impasto Pizzeria, and 2) Out of the Barrel Taproom. 19:04:11 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1420
being done for the pedestrian safety planning. I still get almost hit every time I walk down Laurel street. Ironically, it's never happened to me on El Camino. 19:04:43 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

Mike, did you just raise your voice at me?
19:05:31 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

No more parklets, but more usable (livable) space that encourages our community to come together downtown without fear of vehicles.
19:05:40 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
here is the email Lisa just mentioned [email protected] 19:05:49 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

Further, the former laundry mat at 722 Laurel is going to be Hapa's, a brewpub with a few existing locations. https://hapasbrewing.com/
19:08:00 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

Thank you!
19:08:04 From Greg Lowitz to Everyone:

The best outcome of the pandemic was to liven up Laurel street with restaurants giving a more European experience with outdoor dining. I’ve also spent more money at shops than pre-pandemic because the ability to walk more freely has allowed me to discover and explore local businesses I had no idea existed before. We have a huge opportunity to turn Laurel street into an exciting, vibrant, culinary destination on the mid-Peninsula. 19:08:20 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

Thank you very much, Lisa, staff and consultants, and interested residents! 19:08:20 From Carissa Little to Everyone:
+1Great
19:08:23 From Carissa Little to Everyone:
greg
19:08:25 From Ariela St Pierre to Everyone:

Agreed

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1421
19:08:28 From Rajesh Krishnan to Everyone:
thanks!
19:08:31 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

Agreed!
19:14:06 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
thank you to everyone participating in this evening's workshop!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1422
Downtown San Carlos
Workshop Online Survey
24 Aug - 30 Sep 2022
Poll results

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1423
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – What is the city motto for San
Carlos?
1 0 0
Preserving the Past to Enhance the Future
1 %
Land of Gracious Living
0 %
City of Good Living
94 %
What happens in San Carlos, stays in San Carlos
4 %
America’s Finest City
1 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1424
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Please check all that apply: 1 0 0
I live in Downtown San Carlos
17 %
I live within walking distance of Downtown San Carlos
64 %
I work in Downtown San Carlos
16 %
I shop, eat, and/or utilize a service in Downtown San Carlos 76 %
I own a business and/or commercial property in Downtown San Carlos
12 %
I am just curious about the project
30 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1425
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(1/4)
0 9 3
Poorly planned
Convenient
direct
long
Charming
Vibrant
Unbalanced
Jumbled
needs TOD
Friendly
Funny
Strollable
Charming
Neighborly
Limited
haphazard
Unfinished
Hometown
Charming
Small-town
Not youthful
Old fashioned
Welcoming
Cute
Vibrant
Charming
community
Fun

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1426
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(2/4)
0 9 3
Comfortable
Fun
Confortable
linear
Restaraunts
Meh
Fun
Disappointing
Messy
Lively
friendly
Dangerous
Yummy
Pleasant
potential
Cozy
Charming
fun
Congested
Confused
vibrant
Entertaining
Haphazard
Hometown
Community
Friendly
Vibrant
Nice

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1427
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(3/4)
0 9 3
Community
Opportunity
Charming
jumbled
Enjoyable
cute
Pleasant
Overpriced
Cluttered.

Charming
Welcoming
Welcoming
Vibrant
Character
Downtown
fun
Dated
Neighborhood
small
Vibrant
Outdated
Changing
Friendly
Relaxing
A mess
Liveable
Youthful
Shopping

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1428
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(4/4)
0 9 3
home
Charming
Charming
Charming
Community
Chaotic
Vibrant
Versatile
Dead

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1429
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements would
you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check
all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 4
Beautification, street trees, and landscaping
82 %
Enhanced aesthetics of the commercial character/building design 64 %
Highlighted culture and history of the Downtown with plaques or signage
35 %
Additional outdoor gathering/seating areas (plazas, pocket parks, paseos, etc.)
76 %
Enhanced outdoor dining areas
70 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1430
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements would
you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check
all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 4
Additional gateway and wayfinding signage
23 %
Public art
54 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1431
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following uses would you like to
see more of within Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 6
Shops
68 %
Restaurants
95 %
Culture and entertainment
27 %
Personal services (beauty supply, nail salon, tailor, etc.) 46 %
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 15 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1432
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following uses would you like to
see more of within Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 6
Gathering spaces
23 %
Housing options
3 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1433
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – The namesake for Drake’s
located at the corner of San Carlos Avenue and
El Camino Real is:
0 9 0
Canadian rapper Drake
6 %
The urban dictionary definition for a lower class of dragon or a higher class of serpent
1 %
Sir Francis Drake the daring English explorer in the 16th century 7 %
Mr. Frederick Drake known as the father of “San Carlos” 87 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1434
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street 600-800 blocks (from San
Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of the
following uses would you like to see? (check all
that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 6
Retail
85 %
Restaurant
94 %
Professional Offices
22 %
Medical services/ medical offices
15 %
Boutique hotels
11 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1435
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street 600-800 blocks (from San
Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of the
following uses would you like to see? (check all
that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 6
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 41 %
Standalone housing (apartments, condominiums, or multi-family homes)
6 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1436
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along El Camino Real which of the following
uses would you like to see? (check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 5
Retail
65 %
Restaurant
54 %
Professional Offices
66 %
Medical services/ medical offices
55 %
Auto-related uses
31 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1437
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along El Camino Real which of the following
uses would you like to see? (check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 5
Hotels
45 %
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 63 %
Standalone housing (apartments, condominiums, or multi-family homes)
29 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1438
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – The citizens of San Carlos
voted to incorporate as a city in:
0 9 0
June 1925
48 %
November 1922
14 %
January 1940
22 %
June 1933
16 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1439
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you typically get around Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 6
Walk/assistive devices
94 %
Bike/e-bike
21 %
Skate/Scooter
1 %
Drive
72 %
Rideshare - Uber/Lyft
2 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1440
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you typically get around Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 6
Public Transit
3 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1441
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 8
Improved sidewalks
70 %
Enhanced pedestrian crossings
66 %
Additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks
46 %
Shared e-bikes
21 %
Shared e-scooters
10 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1442
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 8
Enhancements to alleyways
76 %
Improvements to public transit service or amenities (such as bus stops or shelters)
32 %
Better access to the Caltrain Station
42 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1443
Multiple-choice poll
If you parked once and walked around, how far
are you willing to walk to your destination?
(select your preferred distance)
0 9 9
half a block
2 %
about one block
4 %
about two blocks
20 %
5-minute walk
32 %
10-minute walk
41 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1444
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Where do you prefer to park when you visit
Downtown? (select the most often used)
0 9 8
Street parking
49 %
Public parking in lots or alleyways behind businesses
42 %
Public parking structure
53 %
Private parking associated with the business I am visiting 17 %
I do not park in Downtown
14 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1445
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(1/4)
0 9 9
Log Gatos Los Altos
Redwood city
Burlingame (agree with sentiment
on paid parking - I hate it - so
annoying)
Orange
Burlingame
Burlingame, San Mateo
Burlingame and RwC
Mateo burlingame redwood city
Redwood City or San Mateo
Burlingame and Palo have many
retail/restaurant options but not a
fan of paid parking.

Burlingame, Los Altos
Mountain View Redwood City
Redwood City
Menlo Park
Burlingame
Palo Alto, Los Gatos,
Redwood City, Menlo Park, Mtn view
Burlingame San Mateo Palo Alto
Palo Alto Mountain view Redwood
city
Burlingame
Redwood City
Burlingame

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1446
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(2/4)
0 9 9
Burlingame
Belmont
Palo Alto
Palo Alto
Used to be Burlingame but allot of
shops and restaurants have closed
Palo Alto
Menlo Park
Burlingame
Mt View
San Mateo and Redwood City
Palo Alto
Burlingame and Redwood City
and Palo Alto
Menlo Park
Mountain view
Burlingame
Burlingame, San Mateo
Menlo Park
Redwood City
Burlingame
Redwood City
Burlingame
Los Gatos
Los Altos
redwood city
Palo Alto

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1447
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(3/4)
0 9 9
Burlingame
San Mateo
Redwood City
Palo Alto or Burlingame
Palo Alto
none
Redwood city
Burlingame
Palo Alro
Burlingame
Mountain View
University Avenue
Palo alto
Belmont (just kidding)
Redwood City Burlingame
redwood city
Palo Alto
Palo alto
Menlo Park
Redwood city
Menlo park
Menlo Park
Los Gatos
Redwood
Palo Alto
Redwood City
Redwood City
None

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1448
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(4/4)
0 9 9
Palo Alto
Redwood City
Burlingame
Palo Alto
Palo Alto California Street
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Palo Alto
Burlingame
San Mateo
Redwood City
Palo Alto
Palo Alto
San Mateo
Millbrae
Burlingame
Palo Alto & Burlingame
Redwood City
redwood city
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1449
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question - The massive stone blocks used
to make the San Carlos Train Depot were excess
materials from the construction of:
0 9 7
Stanford University
75 %
The Folger Coffee Company Building
4 %
Argonaut Hotel
1 %
Southern Pacific Building
15 %
University of California, Berkeley
4 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1450
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

1 Breakout Room 1
Facilitator: Jami Williams (RRM)
Notetaker: Aden Ferillo (RRM)
Breakout Room 2
Facilitator: Abe Sheppard (RRM)
Notetaker: Debbie Jewel (RRM)
Breakout Room 3
Facilitator: Brady Woods (RRM)
Notetaker: Bret Stinson (RRM)
Breakout Room 4
Facilitator: Brian Hannegan (RRM)
Notetaker: Erina Shimanuki (RRM)
Breakout Room 5
Facilitator: Debbie Rudd (RRM)
Notetaker: Debora Pearson (RRM)
Pages for notes are included
below.

Breakout Room 6
Facilitator: Diane Bathgate (RRM)
Notetaker: Sajuti Haque (City)
Breakout Room 7
Facilitator: Liz Ocampo Vivero (RRM)
Notetaker: Aaron Aknin (Good City Co.)
Breakout Room 8
Facilitator: Pam Ricci (RRM)
Notetaker: Linnet Kwok (City)
Breakout Room 9
Facilitator: Lisa Porras (City)
Notetaker: Andrea Mardesich (City)
Breakout Room 10
Facilitator: Brian Canepa (W Trans)
Notetaker: Rucha Dande (City)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1451
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

2 PROMPTS
Notetakers would be taking notes on the google doc but that they would not be sharing their screen while doing so.

Facilitators will have a slide they can share (includes study area and additional links/info).

Please welcome everyone, share your screen with the slide/map provided, and review the following guidelines:
● We have about 30 minutes for the discussion.
● We would like everyone who wants to speak to have an opportunity to so please limit your first round of comments to 1-2 minutes.
● Use the reactions button to raise your hand and wait to be called upon. If you’re calling in via Zoom dial-in call please dial *9 on your phone’s dial pad to raise your hand, and do the same to lower your hand.
● This is an opportunity to share your thoughts and we ask that you send all questions to the email shown. The city will be reviewing and responding to questions by developing a Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) sheet that will be posted on the website.
● Remind them that they can stay on as long as they like or leave any time, but we will not be going back into the larger workshop setting.
● Respectfully move on if someone is going on too much or not being constructive. You may say that you will call on them again if there is time but assure them that there are plenty of ways to share their thoughts throughout the process. ● If it is quiet or there is a lull you can lead with a few prompting questions:
a. What is something you like about Downtown?
b. What is something that you think could be improved?
c. Please share one big idea for Downtown
Email to put into the breakout room chat: [email protected] Project website to place in breakout room chat: https://www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com/

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1452
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

3 Breakout Room 1
Facilitator: Jami Williams (RRM)
Notetaker: Aden Ferillo (RRM)
4 attendees
- Lena: At what point do the local businesses or chains, anchor stores or other revenue generating uses get involved? What about the impact to our taxes / how is this being paid for?
- Al Savay: Funded by the General Fund. The City Council assigned funds to this project from the General Fund.
- So no referendums, local measures, bond measures?
- Al Savay: No. That’s a possibility down the road but for this study, the money has been allocated already. But if we get new sidewalks, funding will be determined in the future.

We have an economic consultant to help determine funding for those improvements. - Sarah: Why does the downtown plan not include the south part of Laurel Street? - Al Savay: The idea, when the Council first started looking at this, Laurel goes all the way to Eaton. This area is considered the downtown core area, while there is a central area of Laurel. It was too much to do at one time. The City will be pursuing a Specific Plan for that area to tackle it in pieces.
- Karen: I like the idea of redesigning our alleyways for other purposes and I would love to see them used as almost a loop for cycling and move the parking off of that and behind and all of that. I’m definitely a supporter of turning Laurel Street, or portions at least, into a pedestrian thoroughfare.
- Page: I was curious why this is a two-year process? There is no money allocated to making changes as Al said, we’ll probably have to have a referendum which I’m not happy about. Why are two years allocated when there is no change? - Al: This is a Specific Plan which has specific requirements. The goal is to put together a plan to do something, that the community understands, that there is agreement on what to do, and how to do it. The State of CA has state laws that govern plans like this. You have to do certain analyses like traffic, environmental, you may have heard of CEQA, you have to do studies and things like that. It also requires a lot of dialogue within the community. This is the first of meetings you can attend. A steering committee, DTAC, has been established. The goal is to talk to as many people as we can. Two years may seem like a long time but it actually goes by really fast. Hopefully at the end of the two years, we will have an action plan representing what is important to the community and how we get there.
- Jami: This won’t result in a referendum or tax increase. This will result in a roadmap for the City to receive grant opportunities. Like this project supported by the General Fund,

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1453
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

4 this SP will earmark projects for future allocation by the City. The ideas will come from this community and all involved. It’s a mistake to think this project will cost citizens money. CalTrans is starting to become progressive and think bike lanes, walkability is important. They are not providing funding for Cities to help implement things like this.

This is a great example of opportunities for the City to obtain funding for in the future. - Paige: How long did it take for Burlingham to get the way it is? We all like it. - Jami: I don’t know. This plan is setting the stage for the future. The public realm is on how much the decision makers decide to invest in downtown. It’s very much reliant on what private property owners want to do. This is establishing opportunities and constraints. It’s up to property owners to decide what they want to do. Have had lightning speed projects and 10-year projects.
- Sarah: My question about Laurel Street - if this is visioning what should be done, to set an arbitrary cut off at Greenwood maybe doesn’t make sense because to see continuity of the street would be good in street trees, design of the overall streetscape. Visual continuity is good for pedestrians. The streetscape of Laurel ends at Arroyo. You have more businesses between Arroyo and Morse, Brittan and Greenwood. To think about the big picture, it would be good to have a picture that stretches out Laurel to increase the commercial value for real estate further down. It would make it more viable if it looked like it was downtown. I feel like setting an arbitrary line at Greenwood, it misses the question of what defines downtown and our overall vision for San Carlos. When you talk about Caltrans and El Camino, I have two intersections that I feel like are super problematic that I feel like are out of control because they are on El Camino. The timing of the light on El Camino is terrible. To make a left turn, you have to wait an exceedingly long time. To turn left onto Arroyo, the light is not timed to the flow of traffic. I understand this is a Caltrans thing, but I end up going on Cherry Street because it is not impacted by travel. I think this will change a lot about traffic patterns and deviations from downtown.

We should influence Caltrans. The timing of the lights at El Camino and Old County Road is continually a problem because the timing of the light is so terrible. Lots of backup. Those two lights regularly cause the most traffic backup. If we had control over the light timing to give priority to traffic passing on Holly Street, backup could be relieved because no one is going on El Camino. I feel like it’s a serious issue, also, with pedestrian safety. I worried about my husband crossing that everyday. People turning right do not pay attention. A serious accident could happen there. It’s a shame the City allows people to die to make traffic improvements for pedestrian safety. A big problem waiting to happen. I’ve always been told it’s out of our hands because of Caltrans. I feel like it would change traffic and uses in downtown.
- Jami: A traffic study will be a part of this study.
- Karen: Understanding what a downtown SP is, is an opportunity for the community to come together to develop guiding principles that will lead development of the downtown

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1454
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

5 in a consistent manner. It’s our community’s opportunity to share what they would like to see going forward. Like Sarah said, consistency up and down Laurel would be great. We should be future oriented and that would be great to have that consistency. As someone born and raised here, I have seen lots of changes in the town. I like what we were trying to do on El Camino from town to town. I’m frustrated by Samtrans and City pointing fingers at each other on bus stations. If we could figure that out that would be great.

Would love to see increased pedestrian safety crossing El Camino. Buldbouts help to reduce length to pedestrians crossing but it pushes bicyclists into traffic. - Sarah: The parking area on Laurel Street near the back of blueline pizza is listed as Future Plaza. That would be a great thing for the downtown, not just in the area, would allow people to meander, to have more public spaces even to meander. My teens end up leaving downtown and go to the park without feeling safe, even when patronizing businesses. It’s not really socially comfortable with adults giving side-eye so they end up going to Burton, but for the interest of the businesses themselves, it would be better for middle schools and high schools to be able to work further up and down Lauren to spend more money and businesses and have somewhere to sit. There’s not many benches and places to have a seat. I don’t have senior relatives here but I know it makes a difference to provide a place to sit after walking a few blocks. When you go to those long stretches of Laurel Street without any public places to sit, it’s not welcoming for people to stroll in that way.
- Karen: Concern of mine for years. Having places and opportunities for young people to hang out. When I grew up in San Carlos, it was easy and safe to get pizza on one side of Laurel and ice cream on another. I get the reality but I think it would be good to have another opportunity for young kids to have a place to ‘hang out’. - Jami: We are trying to engage people of all ages so looking for what they would like to see is an important part of the process.
- Sarah: Wants to provide comments into a detailed document regarding intersections to provide input to Caltrans.
- Karen: Would be great to provide opportunities for young people to provide input. My teenager works downtown. Would be great to have teen-oriented opportunity for input.

Even a pop-up, kids could write post-its on.
- Al Savay: We have a local teen advisory committee we could try to engage.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1455
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

6 Breakout Room 2
Facilitator: Abe Sheppard (RRM)
Notetaker: Debbie Jewell (RRM)
7 attendees
Debbie - 18 year resident
Carissa - 2012 moved to Sc and lives within walking
Adam - lived 20 years walks everywhere
Rebecca
Why now what are we doing?
Would be helpful to move things forward now vs far in the future.

Carissa
• Since street closure, spending more time visiting Downtown since safer and better community feeling now
• Use data to inform decision making including outdoor seating and making safe family friendly spaces with a small community feeling
• Closure has helped
Rebecca
• Long walks with parking configurations now
• Sometimes don’t want to walk as far to the destinations Debbie
• Business on Laurel are experiencing dynamic changes
• Upzoning proposed for the Housing Element
• Could not honor leases and could need to have renegotiations • Described previous retail space that was remaining but now sold and tenant needs to locate retail elsewhere
• Look at upzoning before decisions are made
Adam
• Laurel cluster for skateboards - What do with this space? • Restaurant and businesses primarily - house or sneakers restaurants mentioned • Mixed perspective on the city

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1456
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

7 • Retail/ restaurants/ hotel and art needed to draw people to Laurel • El Camino retail and restaurants make it hard for parking - Offices better • San Carlos Ave by Drakes traffic lights have shorter timing - One side takes 30 seconds on left side but right side does not go as fast
• El Camino Real bus stop by Drakes is good
• CalTrans Depot - restaurant or cafe would be good to eat after train use Carlie Ceng
• Moved to San Carlos in 2011 small children
• Chose San Carlos due to quaint downtown
• Lives close to downtown
• Like the closure - not worried about cars and feels family friendly • Like San Carlos more than Belmont because walkable downtown • Plan city around walking - not driving
• Air quality and pollution not good with cars
• Don’t mind walking to the downtown
• Farmers Market - miss Thursday night markets
• Weekends in San Mateo college and other locations in the Bay Area - Fighting for vendors on the weekend
• Need a nice gathering event like Farmers Market for Thursday evenings Adam
• Wine fest could be used on Laurel closure in Oct?
• South Laurel private businesses mostly - not retail or restaurants • Not a defined area currently
Rebecca
• Frequent South of Laurel but only for specific uses
• Versus wandering around in the Downtown area north of Britan • Encourage more businesses in the South Laurel area
Debbie
• Like to see more housing in the Downtown
• Likes retail with housing over - Especially on Laurel • Good to include parking underneath

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1457
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

8 Rebecca
• Like housing over retail, but costs to rent the space will skyrocket • Affordable housing but also need affordable retail too Adam
• San Carlos Museum is in a weird spot - Behind King Tron San Carlos Avenue • Need more green spaces downtown
• Undecided on housing in the downtown

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1458
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9 Breakout Room 3
Facilitator: Brady Woods (RRM)
Notetaker: Bret Stinson (RRM)
Helen Mickiewicz: Long-term resident from 1989 - This is the 2nd redo for Laurel St (1st about 20 years ago), there are many other retail uses besides restaurants to have downtown, downtown is already a culinary destination, there were bakeries/auto supply stores/hardware stores/others, having only restaurants will be disappointing, she hopes we don’t invite big chain stores into downtown (Apple store as example) -
David Crabbe: Long-term resident from 1989 - Great opportunity to combine need for housing with downtown except for area around Holly and El Camino where there could be parking use or plazas, loves parklets on Laurel St but they need aesthetic help, add more pedestrian on Laurel - could be 100% pedestrian, Laurel is a slow street and pretty safe to cross, difficult to have a recreational destination downtown to encourage visiting, goes downtown for restaurants, project area is excluding other side of El Camino (Caltrans property) - should look at improving El Camino with bike lanes/other improvements -
Mike Pardini: Long-term resident (60 years), back in the day San Carlos had more diverse uses (theaters, miniature golf, bowling alley, outdoor trampoline!), now there is very little retail downtown, may need to have chains to get retail, stores have closed since pandemic, the area from Holly St to San Carlos Ave proposed to add housing, ATT won’t allow below-ground parking - nothing under 10’ below ground level, small parcels along El Camino not big enough to make a real plaza, surprised the downtown SP area was expanded to Greenwood Ave to the south (not much happening there), original plan for Future Plaza was to have cafes - paid 500k for the alley, San Mateo County has lowest employment in the state -

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1459
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

10 Breakout Room 4
Facilitator: Brian Hannegan (RRM)
Notetaker: Erina Shimanuki (RRM)
Steve Fogel
• Amazon taking away retail business - There is an existing Amazon locker facility at 7 Eleven at Holly and ? across the railroad tracks, if there was one more in the walking area off Laurel, it will draw people in to the area and may stop at restaurants and shops
• Pedestrian blocked off area on 600 block on Laurel - may create confusion, suggest expanding to 800 block? But people may need parking on Bianchini • More and better gathering spaces off of Laurel - currently there is a natural gathering in front of Diddams? on Cherry St below 700 block - a lot of teens gather there, can make the area more inviting to that age group. Find where people naturally gather, and enhance those even more and inviting
• Harrington Park - something about the space that is not very inviting, there is a lot more potential there
• Consider incorporating some festivals to cater towards teens, especially on Cherry St between El Camino and Walnut to block off to pedestrian only • Make conscious efforts to provide shops and activities that teens would be more interested in
Liz
• Outdoor spaces - Laurel St. in front of the library is an opportunity • Redwood City has an arts center with galleries and art exhibitions, might be nice to incorporate that in San Carlos
• Art that everyone can relate to, all inclusive, she does not feel represented • Her daughter struggles to find places to study in downtown • Restaurant on San Carlos Ave closes at midnight, which is nice, but on Laurel closes around 9/10 pm
• Laurel St pedestrian feels like they are imposing on the restaurants (not a clear distinction)
Maya Nayberg on Youth advisory council and DTAC
• Downtown is seen as a family location, not very oriented towards older teens and highschoolers
• Ways to integrate teens in the area? Study areas, hangouts • People like the closed Laurel St to have a walkable area

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1460
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

11 • Skate park project already started and had good feedback and the community is eager, but got shut down with Covid - would like to bring it back David Pollack
• Southern Laurel (900 to 1000 block) needs possible rezoning, bring vibrancy, more mixed use (shops and restaurants on the bottom, housing on the top) • There seems to be more of a clean slate in south Laurel to reimagine and incorporate more mixed use
Samina Ginwall on Youth Advisory Council and DTAC
• Coffee shops for teens, study area, skate parks, a place where kids can interact with each other
• Teens feel as if there is nothing to do in Downtown San Carlos

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1461
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

12 Breakout Room 5
Facilitator: Debbie Rudd (RRM)
Notetaker: Debora Pearson (RRM)
4 Participants
In San Carlos since 2010. Likes downtown but not love it. Visit other downtowns more often for the dining options, but downtown is convenient, meet w/ friends to get ice cream, go to downtown events. Loved the idea of having a central place to go to w/ family, but doesn’t meet all needs… what draws family away from Downtown. Such as more affordable dining options, budget eats, doesn’t feel vibrant at night (some are, but not bookends), feels like an adult vibe at night. Felt more so at Farmers Market that recently moved to Sunday & had more family vibe.

More retail options, goes to the reading bug (?), good w/ kids.

Agrees with previous comments. Friends come to visit & more often go to other downtowns for dinner. Not as many options. Also more of the retired are leaving but restaurants close early.

See young people moving out of area to San Fran who want the nightlife that’s not there. Family life not there either… bowling, movie theater, teenagers hang out, teenagers can be dropped off & enjoy. Have nice shops but most are unique and likes that but want to add more popular stuff there. Population in recent years, in last 10 yrs, sees a lot more families with kids. Makes sense for the City to think about how to attract those types of families & can spend their money in our downtown instead of going to other areas. Historical reasons, initially, retirement community, but now, most new people who move in are families with kids.

Street closure opinions
Likes to walk around, closed street w/out traffic works. Hears some business owners complain about parking spots being taken. Restaurants have more space, but other shops might not need the outdoor space and now customers can’t just drive & park in front and may be losing customers. How can we keep those retail stores compensated for their inconvenience and not be impacted by losing parking spaces. When business applied for bus license, fees likely correspond w/ size of business. Now using more space, may feel like it’s unfair the other businesses who aren't getting the additional space. Wants it to be fair to all businesses. 100% for the street closure. Going to attract and get people to spend money. Huge attraction to people from out of town. Hears about business struggles & mobility issues but doesn’t understand the issues enough to have the opinions. Using the alleyways an option. How smaller downtowns are trending. San Carlos hasn't gone up on the trends which might cause lose out of customers.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1462
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

13 Taking into consideration the changing of demographics. Would like to see more diversity in the restaurant choices. All seem the same.

Parking - were a lot of spaces that were along tree track (?) that were not using. Has a lot of unique things to offer. Christmas lights, halloween people come here. Maybe if had a place to park would stay but didn’t so go slow through the couple blocks streets & then move on to a different city to eat.

Huge believer in street closures, placemaking, pandemic where every city was forced in a great way to really see the value of downtowns and to see them differently. San Carlos not the small town it used to be. A lot like european style and it ‘s the way of the future. Early visioning stage.

Love ballards - they are great, can close off streets in an aesthetic way Public spaces? We need more. Need more public spaces. A lot of people mentioned Redwood city. Goes there a lot especially in summer. Movies/music on the square. Almost every night has something there & people come back year after year. We don’t have that much space but… If close one block, why not close both. Make a walking street. Preferred 2 blocks much more than one. More flexibility and options than walking.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1463
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

14 Breakout Room 6
Facilitator: Diane Bathgate (RRM)
Notetaker: Sajuti Haque (City)
# of Participants: 7 people
• Someone who grew up in San Carlos, curious about the population for San Carlos in 20 years; longer term demographic projections
• Concerned about the empty storefront; does not want a street of just restaurants; how to keep the small businesses especially with all the high rents o Response: the Specific Plan will look at that
• Someone who works in DT and lives in San Carlos- don’t make it look like Santana Row.

Prefers pedestrian friendly environment. We must make it look better because right now is mish mash of parklets. We need more scooter and bike friendly infrastructure as well. Also surprised that so many people didn’t know about Wheeler Plaza parking. A lot of people drive to downtown and look for spaces in Laurel Street or behind TOWN. We need to place a high value on wayfinding. Would love to see gathering spaces and making it comfortable for all ages. Support a diverse community. Sad to see so many shops close. Welcome more businesses and all kinds of businesses such as small businesses that need a small office space. Reinvasion how the spaces are used- would not mind seeing offices. Would love to be able to do all of their errands on Laurels Street.
o Response: The economic market study will assess which options are viable for the downtown
• Work on the wifi in Downtown to make it more accessible and realizable o Response: Specific Plan will look into infrastructure issues • We have such a nice climate to work outdoors if we have more plazas • Community is the essence of Downtown and makes it different from other Downtowns. • Fairly concentrated compared to other downtowns
o Response: should it be expanded?
• Let’s focus on making these few blocks vibrant as possible rather than expanding

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1464
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

15 • If the ZO can be changed to mixed-use where you have office/retail below and residential above. If we had roof decks it would change the look of the street. Varied architecture that is cohesive and thoughtful. Santa Barbara is a different look and is not for San Carlos. o Response: all of that trees, streetscape, public spaces and etc. will all be addresses in the Specific Plan. In the next meeting there will be some alternatives for the community to evaluate.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1465
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

16 Breakout Room 7
Facilitator: Liz Ocampo Vivero (RRM)
Notetaker: Aaron Aknin (Good City Co.)
Allison Chang, Diana, Kevin Norma, Katie, Donna Lera,
Diana: Lived here for 39 years. Likes the way DT SC evolved. Likes the closures. Restaurants.

Likes the idea of alleys being upgraded. She asked why are we doing the downtown plan now? Donna: Likes the mix of uses downtown. Restaurants, offices above ground floor, salons, a lot of different places to go. Likes the variety.

Allison: Downtown Advisory Committee (lives in downtown condo). 13-year resident. Likes the variety downtown. She likes being able to walk everywhere. Likes the local feel, enjoy independent stores and not chains. Wants to make sure we are supporting these stores.

Diana: Alleysways can be improved. Wants to support downtown. Make sure we don’t have to pay for parking. Grew up in burlingame. Doesn’t like the paid parking. She likes the ideas that we put out there in the presentation.

Donna: DTAC member. Would like to see improved frontages of certain stores. More open areas to go and sit. Wants to know what could happen to Harrington Park. She noted the survey looked at Laurel and ECR. ECR is fast paced, and Laurel Street is quieter. Would like to see medical uses consolidated into one area near Greenwood. Would like to see the Harrington Park be used as a connecting to the alley for peds. Asked what are we looking for in terms of feedback.

Diana: Community Foundation member. Having some type of event night where everyone in San Carlos can come together.

Diana: Wants to make sure there is event space. There are no theaters and other community spaces in SC. We should improve that.

Allison: Wants to think of the downtown area as a park. As you walk out of a store you feel safe. Parking should be tucked away. Doesn’t always feel safe when mixing peds w cars.

People like to go on vacation to older cities where people are prioritized. People want to live and visit in areas where people (not car) dominate. More human scale. It would be nice to get away from cars for a block or two. Kids walking from Central should feel safe. Visibility isn’t great with covered parklets and cars.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1466
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

17 Diana: People say that downtown SC has a “European feel”. We should build on that.

Elizabeth: Focus on streetscape, human-scale development.

Donna: Focus on how the different forms of transportation can work better together.

Elizabeth: Areas for seating throughout, connected public space, people having better experiences in the public spaces.

Diana: Older generation may need to park closer. How can you accommodate that? AA: You can prioritize ADA spaces towards the center of downtown closest to storefronts.

Allison: Private businesses have “expectant mom” parking morning. Can we have temp 10- minute or 20-minute spots? Could you do honor system type parking for these spaces? Have golf carts help bring people back to the car.

Diana: Bring back shuttle (SCOOT) funding. Find funding for shuttles downtown.

Allison: Have public restrooms. Helps people stay longer downtown. People use Peet’s now.

Donna: Continue to bring in and expand events downtown. Current events are wonderful draws, would like to have more all ages events. Bring people together as a community.

Diana: Similar to Los Gatos. Wants to keep it feeling unique. Independent stores give it the right feel, versus chains in Burlingame.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1467
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

18 Breakout Room 8
Facilitator: Pam Ricci (RRM)
Notetaker: Linnet Kwok (City)
Myles Kevin - Europe cities are entirely designed for people. Proponent for street closure. The DT does not look nice now. Replace the orange water filled dividers. Vehicles should be exception in DT. People are willing to walk 10min per survey, which means DT is for people and parking are on the perimeter. Parking is relatively safe. Myles go to DT 4 times a week.

Keep Laurel street close, it will make DT a better place. Once Lauren Street is closed we can see how restaurants and retails do creative things. We are blessed with great weather.

Rajesh Krishnan - 9 years in San Carlos. Children 5-10, like to see where kids can learn how to bike, something for young children and family to enjoy instead of just restaurants.

Want to learn more the impact on street closure.

Carline Bauhaus - 30 year resident, raised two children. The big basket is how to really live up to the motto, “City of Good Living”. It is all about the people, people focus. How to design DT where it is welcoming and inviting. Where can children go safely and independently. Most DT conversation is about cars and parking, but want it to be more about the people.

Types of businesses have changed throughout the year. There was a woolworth, now there is Diddams, something for everyone.

A persistent concern is safety. Pedestrian and bike safety. People are not as attentive. A big fan of pedestrian zone (for the people). Work out a systems to deliver to business on certain time of the day. Super Blocks, perimeter parking
The city can set Initial roll out and guilding principles. Every restaurant has created a barrier for their own area. Perhaps make it more open, no big walls and barricades. It will be more dynamic and inviitng.

Need to think about activities, for example, once upon a time the Yoga Health Center did Yoga classes outside.

Tom Davids - Been in SC for 40 years. Served on the Council. Moved from Carmelita to DT. 7 years in DT. Spends a lot of time in Laurel St. Need to hear from the people. This is the great first step to make DT great.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1468
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

19 Breakout Room 9
Facilitator: Lisa Porras (City)
Notetaker: Andrea Mardesich (City)
Participants: Alex Kent, David Peng, K Goforth, Jim Bertram ● Lisa Porras provided a brief overview.
● Alex Kent- heard on news that Samtrans has a longer term plan to redevelop on San Carlos Avenue- what is the timeline? Where will temporary headquarters be? With electrification of Caltrain have had to end leases.
○ Lisa: Modification intervention with building. Don’t know schedule yet. Will include in FAQ.
● Alex Kent- with the closure of a block or potentially more of Laurel (I walk my dog from Elm and Central to downtown and back) - majority of residents like it closed. As a commercial property consultant, could be considered a taking/eminent domain action.

Do any landlords or any of the retail tenants have expressed concern with taking away parking, and taken away access. Restaurants are given a major advantage. Retail business is driven by having a lot of parking. Probably not benefited by having the road closed.
○ Lisa: Yes there have been concerns from retailers, because they operate different than restaurants. How do we facilitate and promote these retailers? Need to address head on as part of plan. Some talk about role of alleys, can they be improved, parking cleaned up, beautified, and provide access to stores. ● Alex Kent- yes room for improvement- don’t have to attract new businesses or developers- in a really good position.
● Alex Kent- in near term restaurants with parklets, want to make sure that sidewalk easements kept open for people to come through- ADA accessibility- sidewalks need to be respected in terms of staying open to walk through even if not going to a restaurant. ● Unknown (direct message to Lisa P) - hardware store helpful in downtown, more recreation and entertainment opportunities for adults and youth, and organic grocery store. Pedestrian plazas great to have but need to accommodate elderly and disabled. ● David Peng- Other downtowns around Peninsula- represent both competition and templates- a lot of Burlingame responses. Bigger cities (RWC and PA) hard to compare, more like Burlingame and Los Altos.
○ Lisa: Need to understand “why” these cities were chosen- what are best attributes?
● David Peng- Burlingame more vibrant- more people, is that a function of competition? ● Alex Kent- family lived in Burlingame- advantage to renovate infrastructure- change parking from diagonal to parallel. Lost spaces on Burlingame Ave- but widened

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1469
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

20 sidewalks, renovated whole area, gives it much newer premier shopping destination.

Paid for by City and landlords. More consolidation of spaces, easier to coordinate.

Economically, 30% of visitors are from the regional area as opposed to Burlingame, and another 30% by hotels- because close to SFO- boosts economy. ● Jim Bertram- part of DTAC- great hearing everything- similar to what hear from family, neighbor and friends. Burlingame is very attractive, wide sidewalks, very coordinatedflow into crosswalks. One thing is parking is right there, waiting to park, humming in front of you. Like where don’t have car in San Carlos. Similar to European city. Burlingame has some fantastic old building, fewer in San Carlos. Friend who is a landlord on San Carlos Avenue- many years- city came and partnered to make changes to facades - saw huge improvements with that. Is that worth considering as well? Many buildings haven’t been updated in awhile- think it would be worth looking at again. ● Alex Kent- spoken to a lot of landlords on Laurel- remarkable how valuable some buildings in the downtown are when they are not updated- can generate solid rent. There is almost a disincentive to improve look because making a lot of rent money. Need the City proactively try to reach out. A lot of consolidation - may move things along. In terms of retail and restaurants- windfall for some of these as more of the office is built on the East Side. Could be negative in terms of traffic. All employees want to go downtown.

Things may go more upscale, rents for retail will go up. ● Alex Kent- look at crime maps, armed robberies around Laurel, personally more police patrol on foot. Undercover police, or those not “armed up” useful to have police walk the block. A lot of room to improve safety, reduce crime, more presence, visible video cameras, specifically monitored by Police on Laurel. Bulk purchase to allow people to buy cameras for a private property. There is a program where you can register your camera and Sheriff’s will know you have a camera if crime occurs and can come ask for help.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1470
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

21 Breakout Room 10
Facilitator: Brian Canepa (W Trans)
Notetaker: Rucha Dande (City)
Number of attendees: 4 attendees, Kristen Clements (does not wish to participate), Jennifer Cray, Josh Wallace, Christine Gray, Meghan R (City)

1. Christine - Child psychologist, lives and works in San Carlos for 7 years. Owns business above Red Hot Chilli Peppers, was doubtful about pandemic changes but really liked the new atmosphere with closed Laurel St.

Concerns: Agree alleys are a mess, but it would be really hard to get deliveries if not there.

Alleys need maintenance and delivery access for packages. Hopes to maintain her office space as she loves it. Music from the restaurants shouldn’t be blasting in the middle of the day. My biggest concerns with this plan would be to know if my patients can walk and park to get to my place? Most changes I like, the Downtown plan should not only plan to positively impact restaurants but should consider functioning of other businesses as well.

Intersection concerns: Samtrans garage is free, I park there. Need to cross the intersection twice making an L shape walk. That intersection is a nightmare. If that is part of this plan, there are multiple times the cars have run me over. Recently the timing was changed which seems to be helping. That intersection is very dangerous. Any right turn is dangerous.

Brain - we are going to take a global perspective while preparing this plan Brian - What is your take on Laurel and El Camino corridor? I don't like walking on ECR and driving on Laurel. Either it needs to shut down or enforce Jaywalking.

Brian - citizens have complained that the Parklets and restaurants that have recently come up create a tunnel effect for peds, any thoughts?
It does feel that way, but also feels temporary. Something that should allow kids to bicycle and gather. Something I really like living here.

2. Jennifer - New to San Carlos, moved a couple of years ago. Used to live in Palo Alto for over 25 years. Pro pedestrian. Is both sides of El Camino Real part of the plan? Brian: El Camino is Caltrans' jurisdiction, but we can talk to them to recommend ideas.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1471
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

22 Are design considerations part of the plan or only size and use? Brian: Yes, we are considering everything we can.

I live close to downtown and walk a lot. I feel super lucky to be able to do that.

Concerns: The design choices of the architecture along El Camino are unfortunate and unattractive, not pedestrian friendly. Feel ECR cannot ever be part of the downtown because of the architecture. Buildings with no setbacks is very unattractive.

So many restaurants having so much outdoor space is great. Outdoor dining serves as a great public utility. I would be in favor of expanding the outdoor space and also allowing them to pay for it.

Brian - Can you elaborate more on the design features you find unattractive? The new buildings that have come up along ECR have no architectural features to make them attractive. Townhouses, apartments, condos. The buildings look more institutional.

We like walking in the middle of the street because of the tunnel effect due to the outdoor seating of the restaurants. I don't like eating there too, because there handbags could be swiping through my dinner plate. The walking areas should be pulled out in front as it feels like walking through the eating area. The employees are back and forth across pedestrians – they would appreciate that separation. Hallmark store, how is that even in business? I wish there was more non-restaurant business presence. I would like the downtown feel more than restaurants, maybe a permanent plaza to have evening concerts and events. Public space should be carved down there. Harrington Park is too tiny.

The store owners I have talked to, they are worried about the economy. Empty businesses and spaces are very concerning. What can we do to get businesses back? I am really happy that the City is doing so much to make it walkable. Happy City, walkable city books are what I am reading.

Josh Wallace - San Carlos does not do enough to preserve its history. I hope this plan does that. San Carlos should be more proactive and advocate for preservation for the little that is left.

Carlos Club.

3. Brian: Any specific buildings you think should be saved?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1472
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

23 Not much left except Carlos Club. Light house is gone, neon sign, I have tried to work with the City to do what they can to save this place.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1473
Downtown Community Workshop #2
February 15, 2023

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1474
Downtown Community Workshop #2
February 15th, 2023
The City of San Carlos held its second virtual community workshop on February 15, with a great turnout of approximately 70 community members who shared their ideas, perspectives, and preferences for the 700 block of Laurel Street, possibilities for new and improved plazas, parks and public gathering spaces, and big changes for alleyways.

During the presentation, attendees participated in an interactive exercise using a real-time polling tool called “Sli.do” to respond to a series of questions posed by the project team. The full presentation slide deck, Q&A transcript, meeting recording, and polling results are available below.

Meeting Materials:
• Presentation
• Public input received from Zoom and Sli.do
• Interactive Poll Results Summary

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1475
Community Workshop #2
February 15, 2023

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1476
Downtown Specific Plan Team
www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1477
Welcome! Thank you for joining us.
❖ This meeting is being recorded.
❖ The recording will be available afterwards
(on the project website).
❖ Your microphones will be muted during the presentation. ❖ Please type questions or comments into the chat feature.

A Few Notes

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1478
Turn video on
or off
Mute or unmute
microphone
Toggle between speaker
& gallery view by clicking
on these icons
Along the bottom of your screen,
you will see this toolbar of buttons:

At the top right corner of your
screen, you will see these options:

Zoom Meeting Features
Chat will only be visible by the meeting
hosts ~ please send questions or
comments into the chat

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1479
Al Savay, AICP
Community & Economic Development Director
City of San Carlos
Lisa Porras, AICP
Planning Manager, Advance Planning
City of San Carlos
Mayor Adam Rak
City of San Carlos
Tonight’s Workshop Team
Jami Williams
Principal, RRM Design Group
Brian Canepa, TDM-CP
Principal, W-Trans
Katja Dillmann
Senior Planner, RRM Design Group

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1480
DTAC Meeting Agenda
❖ Project Refresher
❖ Draft Urban Design & Placemaking Concepts
❖ Next Steps
Tonight’s Agenda

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1481
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Project Refresher

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1482
We are here

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1483
Specific Plan Area

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1484
General Plan
• City’s long-term vision for the future
• Goals, policies, objectives that guide physical
development
Zoning Ordinance
• Establishes land uses and development standards
Specific Plan
• Must be consistent with General Plan
• Provides a vision and direction for a specific area
• Provides a customized regulatory framework
• Takes precedence over standards set by the Zoning Ordinance

GENERAL PLAN

ZONING CODE

SPECIFIC
PLAN
What is a Specific Plan?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1485
Establishes:
• Private Realm – land uses and development
standards
• Public Realm – mobility, streetscape
beautification, plaza, alley, and
infrastructure improvements and urban
design concepts
• Implementation actions and programs
• Development approval authority, processes,
and streamlining
What is a Specific Plan?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1486
Public Engagement
• Stakeholder Meetings and Focus Groups
• City Council Member 1-on-1 Meetings
• 4 DTAC Meetings (June, July, September
2022 & January 2023)
• Community Workshop #1 (August 2022)
• Tonight! Community Workshop #2

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1487
Public Engagement: Map Activity
Over 470 Comments
Themes:
• Mobility: 163
• Streetscape: 83
• Gathering Spaces: 75
• Allowable Uses: 64
• And more: 85

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1488
What We’ve Heard
Beautification, Street Trees, & Landscaping
Make street closure more attractive and permanent
More Outdoor Gathering Spaces & Seating Areas
Support for outdoor dining and gathering space at Laurel Plaza Enhance Alleyways
Support for organizing the alleyways, making them more user friendly Improve Sidewalks
Desire for wider sidewalks for pedestrians, so there is greater separation from traffic on busy streets.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1489
What We’ve Heard
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in one word,
what would it be?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1490
What We’ve Heard
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in one word,
what would it be?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1491
What We’ve Heard
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in one word,
what would it be?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1492
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Imagining the Future
of Downtown San Carlos

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1493
Imagining the Future of Downtown
“Performance Stair,” Wellmont Arts Plaza, Montclair, New Jersey

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1494
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Courthouse Square, Redwood City Wellmont Arts Plaza, Montclair, New Jersey

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1495
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Fountain of Rings, Atlanta, GA Riverview Park, Shreveport, LA

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1496
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Bloor Yorkville, Toronto, Canada Vanke Sanlin, Shanghai

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1497
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Berczy Plaza, Toronto, Canada Barri Gòtic (Gothic Quarter), Barcelona, Spain

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1498
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Barri Gòtic (Gothic Quarter), Barcelona, Spain

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1499
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Montreal, Canada Quebec, Canada

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1500
What do you think?
❖ Looking at these inspirational photos, and keeping in mind other places you’ve been, in your opinion what is the most important element or feature you would like us to incorporate into the downtown Vision? Word Cloud (one word) ❖ Think back to some of your most unforgettable experience in the public realm – what was it about that space that made it unforgettable? What was the experience like? How did it make you feel? Word Cloud (one word)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1501
And more to share with us!
❖ Why do you currently go Downtown San Carlos? (check all that apply) ▪ Eat or drink (restaurants, cafes, coffee/boba shops)
▪ Shop
▪ Work
▪ Services (dentist, tailor, nail salon, etc.)
▪ Farmers Market, or Special Event (Art and Wine Fair, Goblin Walk, etc.) ▪ To catch the train, or catch the bus along El Camino Real ▪ Because I live Downtown
▪ To visit, take a walk, or stroll along Laurel Street
▪ None of the above

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1502
What do you think?
❖ When you go the 700 block, today, what draws you there? Specifically, what is the reason you currently go to this location? (Word Cloud) ▪ One word answer
❖ The City has been hearing many comments and support for closing the 700 block permanently. Do you agree yes or no?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1503
Participate through Slido.com
OPTION 2:

Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
OPTION 1:

Join via web browser by going to slido.com
and typing in the event passcode: 2509916
Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
There are two ways to join:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1504
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Urban Design
and Placemaking Concepts

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1505
Opportunities
31 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1506
Urban Design / Placemaking
Tonight’s Discussion Points
• Public Space Elements
• Alley Improvements
• Street Closure on 700 Block of Laurel
Street
Source: Katja Dillmann

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1507
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Public Space Elements

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1508
Public Spaces
• Laurel/Wheeler Plaza
• Harrington Park

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1509
Laurel Plaza
Retail & Restaurant Development with a Small Plaza Space Source: City of San Carlos Source: Al Savay

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1510
Laurel Plaza
Large Plaza Space
Source: iStock
Source: Al Savay

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1511
Harrington Park Concepts
Opportunities:
• Park & Plaza
• All Plaza
• Music & Stage

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1512
Harrington Park – Park & Plaza

1. Wood Beams and Lighting

2.Nature Play Area

3.Vines/Wall Screen

4.Fountain

5. Tree/Planter/Seat Wall

6. Memorial or Art Feature

7. Memorial Wall

8. Archway Entrance

9. Alley Access and Signage

10. Tables and
Chairs/Umbrellas

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1513
Harrington Park – Park & Plaza

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1514
Harrington Park – All Plaza

1. Bistro Lighting

2.Special Paving & Seating Area

3.Vines/Wall Screen

4.Fountain

5. Tree/Planter/Seat Wall

6. Special Paving Into Laurel St.

7. Memorial Wall/ Art Wall

8. Alley Access and Wayfinding

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1515
Harrington Park – All Plaza

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1516
Harrington Park – Music & Stage

1. Shade sails

2.Special Paving & Seating Area

3.Vines/Wall Screen

4. Stage

5. Tree/Planter/Seat Wall

6. Memorial Wall

7. Archway Entrance

8. Alley Access & Signage

9. Bistro Lighting

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1517
Harrington Park – Music & Stage

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1518
Possible Public Space Elements
• Fountain/ Water feature
• Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)
• Lawn or landscaping
• Area where children can play
• Stage/music venue
• Open air with some shade covering
• Tree canopy
• Bistro lighting
• Public art

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1519
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
What do you think?
Polling Exercise

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1520
Tell us!
❖What is your highest priority for public spaces in the downtown area? ▪ I want to enjoy a public space and the sense of community ▪ I want to go somewhere with my kids
▪ I want to be able to eat lunch outside
▪ I would like events and programs

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1521
Tell us!
❖Please rank the amenities in order of importance to you in the downtown core (#1 is the MOST important)
• Fountain/ Water feature
• Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)
• Lawn or landscaping
• Area where children can play
• Stage/music venue
• Open air with some shade covering
• Tree canopy
• Bistro lighting
• Public art

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1522
What do you think?
❖ I would like to see more of the
following in Downtown
(select all that apply):
▪ Outdoor dining
▪ Street furnishings
▪ Plazas
▪ Public Art
▪ Wayfinding (signs w/direction, distance)
▪ Street trees
▪ Bicycle Parking
▪ Other
❖ What types of programs or
entertainment would you like to see
downtown (select all that apply):
▪ Music events
▪ Kid friendly programs
▪ Theater/Performance pop up events
▪ Cultural or art exhibits
▪ Movies on the plaza/square
▪ Activities/yoga, tai chi, qi gong
▪ Chess, backgammon, game night

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1523
Participate through Slido.com
OPTION 2:

Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
OPTION 1:

Join via web browser by going to slido.com
and typing in the event passcode: 2509916
Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
There are two ways to join:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1524
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Alley Improvements

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1525
Alley Network

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1526
Today’s Alleys
• Lack of signage
• Lack of lighting and can feel unsafe
• Individual trash receptacles clutter
• No clear pedestrian path of travel
• Service / delivery congestion
• Private / public parking confusion
• Lack/minimal handicap accessible
(ADA) parking
• Lack of bike parking and connectivity

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1527
Proposed Enhancements
• Wayfinding
• Dedicated pedestrian paths of travel
• Dedicated delivery areas
• Dedicated trash receptacle areas
• Clearly denoted public parking
• Clearly marked ADA parking
• Bike parking and connectivity
• Pedestrian Scale/Street Lighting
• Alley Art/ Mural Program

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1528
Alley Enhancement
Existing: El Camino Real Alley from Laurel St. Proposed: El Camino Real Alley from Laurel St.

A. Gateway Feature
B. Special Parking Lot
Pavement
C. Level Sidewalk Crossing
D. Rolled Curb
E. Mural Wall Opportunity
F. Decorative Street Light
G. Truncated Dome
Example gateway feature

KEY MAP

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1529
Alley Enhancement SAN CARLOS AVE.

KEY MAP
A. Crosswalk Striping
and Ramp
B. Pedestrian Crossing
Sign
C. Wayfinding Signage
Existing: Public Parking between Walnut St. & Laurel St. Proposed: Public Parking between Walnut St. & Laurel St.

Example decorative crosswalk

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1530
CHERRY
Alley Enhancement
Existing: Parking between B of A and US Banks Proposed: Parking between B of A and US Banks A. Flush Concert Edge
B. Special Parking Lot
Pavement – Ped Route
C. Wayfinding
OLIVE

KEY MAP
Example wayfinding

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1531
Alley Enhancement

KEY MAP
Existing: Alley near Cherry St. and Laurel St.

Example alleyway mural
A. Decorative Wayfinding
Signage
B. Special Paving
C. Lighting
D. Rolled Curb
E. Mural Wall Opportunity
Proposed: Alley near Cherry St. and Laurel St.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1532
Alley Examples
Source: RRM Design Group Source: Google Maps
Source: Google Maps

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1533
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Laurel Street

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1534
Laurel Street – 700 Block
Today’s Focus – 700 Block
• Future Decisions for the 600 & 800 Blocks of Laurel Street • Extend Street Closure to San Carlos
• Extend Street Closure to Arroyo
• Extend Street Closure to San Carlos and Arroyo
1 2
3 1
2 3

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1535
Laurel Street – 700 Block, 4 Options
Flexible Closure Option:

Temporary in nature, spruced up but removable
Widened Sidewalk Option:

Widen sidewalk, two travel lanes, parallel parking
Plaza Option:

Full Closure as Plaza Concept
Pre-2020 Option:

Eliminate Street Closure – open to cars as it was pre-pandemic

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1536
Laurel Street – 700 Block – Flexible Closure
Flexible Closure Option: Temporary but spruced up
New street furnishings and lighting, possible intermittent hours or events

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1537
Laurel Street – 700 Block – Flexible Closure
Flexible Closure Option: Temporary but spruced up
Source: Al Savay Source: Al Savay

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1538
Laurel Street – 700 Block – Flexible Closure
Trade-Offs:
• Loss of 63 parking spaces
• Lacks full benefits of
permanent street closure
• Intermittent traffic
disruption - motorists must
remember closure if hours
are changed
Advantages:
• Maximum Flexibility
• Allows a variety of businesses
to activate space on a
temporary basis
• Facilitates community-building
• Improves pedestrian access
Flexible Closure Option

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1539
Laurel Street – 700 Block - Widened Sidewalk
Widened Sidewalk Option:

Enhanced pedestrian environment, two travel lanes, retains some parking

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1540
Widened Sidewalk Option:

Two travel lanes, retains some parking
Source: City of Ventura
Source: Katja Dillmann
Laurel Street – 700 Block - Widened Sidewalk

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1541
Trade-Offs:
• Loss of large community
space
• Loss of 20 parking spaces
Advantages:
• Expanded sidewalks with street
furniture and lighting
• Pedestrians are retail adjacent
• Additional room for sidewalk
dining
• Maintains vehicle access and
adjacent parking
Widened Sidewalk Option
Laurel Street – 700 Block - Widened Sidewalk

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1542
Laurel Street – 700 Block – Plaza
Plaza Option: Full closure, space is converted into a Plaza

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1543
Laurel Street – 700 Block – Plaza
Plaza Option: Full closure, space is converted into a Plaza Source: Al Savay Source: Al Savay

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1544
Laurel Street – 700 Block – Plaza
Trade-Offs:
• Loss of 63 parking spaces
• Delivery required from
alley
• No vehicle visibility
• Minor traffic disruption
• Potential emergency
access delays
Advantages:
• Dedicated community space
• Downtown plaza becomes a
destination
• More space for retail, dining, and
public space
• No limits on amenities, lighting,
and special paving
Plaza Option

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1545
Laurel Street – 700 Block - Pre-2020 Option
Pre-2020 Option: Eliminate Street Closure
Open to cars as it was pre-2020

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1546
Trade-Offs:
• Lose a community asset
• Lose outdoor dining
opportunity
• Lose flexibility of using
space
Advantages:
• No loss of parking
• No new impact on how
motorists navigate the
Downtown
• No user confusion
Pre-2020 Option
Laurel Street – 700 Block – Pre-2020 Option

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1547
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
What do you think?
Polling Exercise

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1548
Tell us! 700 Block – Which option
Flexible Closure Option:

Temporary in nature, spruced up but removable
Widen Sidewalk Option:

Widen sidewalk, two travel lanes, parallel parking
Plaza Option:

Full Closure as Plaza Concept
Pre-2020 Option:

Eliminate Street Closure – open to cars as it was pre-pandemic

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1549
What do you think?
❖ Which is your preferred 700 block option?
▪ Flexible Closure
▪ Widened Sidewalk
▪ Plaza Option
▪ Pre-2020 Option
❖ I would go downtown more often (select 2):
▪ If there was a permanent plaza / public gathering spaces ▪ If there were wider sidewalks with adjacent parking
▪ If I could drive down the 700 block, like before 2020 ▪ For Farmer’s Market and for other cool / fun events
▪ Other

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1550
Participate through Slido.com
OPTION 2:

Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
OPTION 1:

Join via web browser by going to slido.com
and typing in the event passcode: 2509916
Join via your smart phone by opening your
camera app and scanning the survey QR code
There are two ways to join:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1551
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Next Steps

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1552
Coffee and Comments Open House
Saturday, March 4, 2023
10 am – noon
San Carlos Library Community Room
2 nd Floor
610 Elm Street

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1553
We are here

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1554
Next Steps
❖ Review Urban Design and Placemaking Concepts
✓ DTAC meeting (Jan. 25)
✓ Community Workshop (Feb. 15)
▪ Coffee and Comments Open House (March 4)
▪ 2
nd Online Survey – March 1st through April 1st
▪ Planning Commission (late March)
▪ City Council (late March)
❖ Prepare Preferred Concept
▪ Additional rounds of review with the community!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1555
sancarlosdowntownplan.com
[email protected]
Thank you for participating!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1556
Question Report
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan Workshop (2/15/2023, 7pm) Question Details
# Question Asker Name Answer Answer Name
1 I need the help, the chat is blocked Xiao-Lin Ruihang Let me look into this one moment please Katja Dillmann 2 Caulenstein Poppins here, I just love San Carlos! Caulenstein Poppins Thank you for joining us Katja Dillmann 2 Caulenstein Poppins here, I just love San Carlos! Caulenstein Poppins Thank you Caulenstein - I love it too! Lisa Porras# City of San
Carlos
3 And the unmute button, please help need this talking Xiao-Lin Ruihang Please send all questions and comments to us, here in the Q & A. Thank you Katja Dillmann
4 Same. Chat is "disabled". We can submit Q's here though, correct? L. Salazar yes. Thank you Katja Dillmann 5 Why is the chat blocked and i cant unmute? Anonymous Attendee Please use the Q & A feature Katja Dillmann 6 Please announce that Chat is disabled, but we can use Q&A Heidi Liebenguth 7 FYI - unless my zoom is unique … it says the chat feature is disabled so all questions will need to go through Q&A Becky
8 Also you need to click on “Survey” when going to Slido Tom Feledy Thank you, Tom! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
9 My name is Bryan Shields and I am a Representative of Carpenters Local 217. I wanted to make sure that labor is thought of as this plan progresses. With out labor standards such as access to work opertunity for local residence, apprenticeship and healthcare the Plan Bryan Shields Carpenters Local 217 Thank you Brian - I also received your email. All the best, Lisa Lisa Porras# City of San
Carlos
10 …not the Q&A tab at Slido, but the “Polls” tab Tom Feledy Thank you!! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
11 I don’t like walking through open dining areas. Weird. Also the road in the closed block is too open and undefined to feel comfortable. Restaurants are big becasue that’s all there is Anonymous Attendee Thank you for sharing!
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
12 Why do I have to go through Restaurant space to get to the bank or post office? If you keep Laurel Closed, can the asphalt be dug up and made permeable? Anonymous Attendee Thank you for sharing! We've noted your comment. From Megan with the City
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
13 Can the restaurant parklets be opened to the street area so the middle of the street doesn’t feel so walled off? Sarah Kelsey Thank you for this suggestion! We've received your comment and idea! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
14 Have you looked at what makes other downtowns vibrant or poorly planned? Closing the 700 block allows you to do so much more such as having a plaza. Gladwyn d'Souza Thank you for your comment! We are considering and reviewing successful examples from other communities - such a great way to see what works well!
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
15 Can the specific measures to invite and welcome ebikes and bicycles in the plans be shared? It’s essential that safe routes downtown, bike lock parking suitable for big heavy fat tire ebikes is included, and bikes have preferred parking closest to Laurel. These are MarkB Thank you for this suggestion! We are considering bicycle facilities as a part of the Plan, and we can provide more information - please feel free to reach out to [email protected]
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
16 Why are you limiting the questions to only the 700 block? What about adjacent blocks? David Crabbe They will also be addressed as part of plan. Stay tuned! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
17 The 700 block, if closed, which I hope is the case, will need redevelopment so that it’s not restaurant centric. Sal Burns Thank you for your feedback! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
18 It would be great to have the restaurants more like sidewalk cafes and less like restaurant walls on the street. Sarah Kelsey Thanks for your comment! It's duly noted.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
19 A lot of the 1st question answers were variations of nature, trees, gardens, and green.

The example pictures you showed were cool, but our downtown needs nature too! EXAMPLES: Boulder, Aspen, Portland, Utrecht and many others. MarkB Love this! Yes, we can consider incorporating "greening of Downtown" into the Plan.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
20 is there any interim plan to improve/restore downtown somewhat — mainly removing the orange plastic jersey barrier, etc — while this larger plan is being developed and constructed. Or do we have to live with the pandemic look for 2-3 more years on top of Jeffrey Stanger Hello Jeffrey, Yes, the City is considering interim improvements that could be implemented before the Plan is adopted.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
21 This park is an absoluite dump gregstclaire
Thank you for your comment - Please share too what could enliven the space from your perspective!
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
22 Need to be mindful of how many parking areas are eliminated. Not everyone can walk downtown and if people can’t park easily they won’t come. Anonymous Attendee live answered Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
22 Need to be mindful of how many parking areas are eliminated. Not everyone can walk downtown and if people can’t park easily they won’t come. Anonymous Attendee Great observation! We will be considering this as part of plan.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
23 We need more trees, not less, to minimize heat island effect. Natural features are good for mental health, too. Kathleen Goforth Thank you for your suggestion! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1557
Question Report
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan Workshop (2/15/2023, 7pm) Question Details
# Question Asker Name Answer Answer Name
24 I don’t think fountains are a good idea. We may have had a lot of rain recently but drought is a fact of life in CA JC Thank you for your feedback! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
25 What is the size in feet of Harrington Park? Tom Feledy The overall acreage is 0.3 acres.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
26 After watching the latest World Cup and Super Bowl I can imagine an open air gathering area to watch these types of entertainment Mike Pardini Definitely. Thanks for sharing! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
27 need a place for teens to hang out. we have places for the littles, but nothing for the teens. skate park? lounge areas? Anonymous Attendee Great idea! Thanks for sharing.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
28 What have the musicians said about the location of the stage. Not sure about moving the stage, would music spillover away from laurel? Anonymous Attendee Great suggestion to reach out to the musicians! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
29 I.m not able to respond to any of the questions asking for a response. How can I respond? evacombs Please go to Slido.com and join using the code 2509916. thanks! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
30 Harrington Park is fine as it is - no need to use tax dollars to change it [email protected] Thanks for your feedback! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
31 When the maps showing the downtown store get updated is there a way that the Industrial Arts Area can be highlighted? Specifically the wineries and Breweries that are on the Southeast side of the city Mike Pardini
Yes, we can look into this - this is a really nice way to connect all of San Carlos' districts.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
32 Lost in question 7 is the need for ground treatment that’s appealing, not asphalt and concrete. Ie porous (for ground water) tile or brick or other appealing ground covering. MarkB Great suggestion! Thanks for sharing.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
33 If trees are selected please make sure that they do not drop stuff like the trees do now. I know of some businesses downtown that have had carpets ruined from the sap and other things dropped from the current trees Mike Pardini Great observation. Thanks for sharing! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
34 How will tree canopy be added? Will they be small trees in planters or larger trees. Hope larger trees and open space. Debbie and Gary Thank you for your feedback! We can consider this in more detail.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
35 there needs to be better clarity around kid friendly activities. there is a lot for the under 10yo, but what about the teens. Needs to have better distinction Anonymous Attendee Thanks for that feedback! We will consider this in the plan.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
36 Echoing Mike Pardinis comment,. The dowtown trees have a terrible disease and drip sap. This has to be fixed gregstclaire Thanks for sharing! We will consider this while making recommendations.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
37 across el camino seems to have ample area for parking. any thought given to a walkway over/under el camino so that can be accessed and well connected to downtown? Jeffrey Stanger Yes, good point about El Camino Real. We are considering enhanced pedestrian crossings on El Camino Real as a part of the Plan.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
38 Allow ADUs with commercial zoning to create the vibrance you see in many countries outside the US but also in some neighborhoods in Portland. Gladwyn d'Souza Thank you for your suggestion! We can look into this.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
39 Need to firm up employee parking so business owners stop parking behind their businessed and free these up for customers gregstclaire Thanks for your comment! We will take this into consideration.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
40 the city can bring the funding in to make alleys of art , retail, mix of retail and street food, etc. Gladwyn d'Souza Great idea! Thanks for sharing.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
41 you are creating an unfair advantage for restaurants located in the 700 block. Need to assess those restaurants for improvements. Also need an attractive uniform look for all parklets that will continue to show up sporadically on all other blocks of Laurel like they Vince Gritsch Thanks for your feedback! We will consider this while making the Plan recommendations.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
42 Agree with Gladwyn’s suggestions! Debbie and Gary Thanks for your feedback! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
43 If close off the street, need to force restaurant parklets to be more open to the street and more attracive. Right now, they close off the center of the street from the storefronts.

The center of the street needs to be fully landscaped with street furniture, kiosks, etc. to David Crabbe Great observation! Thanks for sharing. We will take this into consideration.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
44 That is a photo of the 600 block. To be clear we’re just talking about the 700 block ONLY, correct? DZ
Yes, we are only talking about the 700 block tonight - but we will talk about the 600 and 800 blocks in the future.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
45 Allow thumbs up and down on some of these slides. Gladwyn d'Souza Great suggestion! We can look into this for next time.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
46 If street is closed off, will the orange barriers be removed? How will restaurant seating be separated from pedestrian walkways and plaza? Debbie and Gary Great questions! These are things we will definitely need to consider.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
47 restaurants should be just in front of their establishment. May seem to be bleeding infront of other stores. if they have a parklet, why are they crowding the narrow sidewalks? it feels more like an either/or, but not both as it is currently Anonymous Attendee Thanks for your observation! We will take this into consideration.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
48 I would go downtown more often if it was friendly for bikes and ebikes. Please ADD THIS OPTION! MarkB Thank you!!
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1558
Question Report
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan Workshop (2/15/2023, 7pm) Question Details
# Question Asker Name Answer Answer Name
49 I would go downtown more often if there was a bike path to downtown through town! Sonia Elkes Thanks for sharing! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
50 Q 11,I would go downtown more often if the sidewalks were wider, but bringing back the parking isn’t an issue for me, now. It has been important when transporting friends /familly with mobility issues. Anonymous Attendee Thank you for sharing! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
51 Q11: I would go downtown more often if it was friendly and safe for bikes and ebikes.

Currently no bike parking, no safe routes downtown, and signs say no bikes. Wrong wrong wrong. I am hostage to my car because bikes and e-bikes aren’t invited MarkB Great observation! We will take this into consideration.

Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
52 The Walnut-Cherry and Walnut-Olive intersections need to be 4-way stops! Anonymous Attendee Thank you for your feedback! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
53 many employees are parking in public spaces, both on the street and in the alley. Makes it more difficult to park. need to find a way to incentivize them to park in designated spots. Anonymous Attendee Thanks for sharing!
Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
54 For a destination consider how the community get’s there and make sure that both sides, east and west, have safe efficinet and pleasent access. Gladwyn d'Souza Definitely an important consideration. Thanks for sharing! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
55 this was recorded. Where can it be accessed later for those that missed it? Anonymous Attendee We will be posting the recording on the Downtown Specific Plan website which is at www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
56 I own El Camino property. Permanent Laurel closure only exacerbates alleyway traffic/parking management. I don't see practical solutions. Current trash enclosure rules made it impractical and expensive to create trash enclosure. Nobody likes visible Anonymous Attendee Thanks for your feedback! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
57 Larger feedback: This is all tooooo tepid. I like your 700 block plaza improvements.

More please. But we all want 3-4 or even a 2 X 4 block closed area for bikes and pedestrians downtown with cars around the edges in garages or one way streets. This MarkB Thanks for your feedback! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
58 Bikes that can easily be going at 20mph and don’t mix well with plaza/child friendly areas.

Please consider if bikes are part of this plan Megan Shackleton (she/her) Thank you for your feedback! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
59 Hoping this goes better than the residential planning work done a couple years ago. I attended all 3 publlic feedback sessions and the feedback was 100% against the plans presented. Represented hundreds of people. The consultants from Berkeley just Vince Gritsch Thank you for your feedback and for attending tonight! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
60 Would prefer parklets with nature and fountains and nice brick/tile/floor to spill into Laurel street area to truly create a plaza look that’s integrated and inviting and one big charming vibrant area. MarkB Great, thanks for sharing! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
61 need to find a way to encourage and support smaller businesses that are an asset to our community. Reading Bug is at the top of that list Anonymous Attendee Thanks for your feedback! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
62 what are the discussions about building height limits? I’m concerned with what Laurel street will look like if it is suddenly all 4 story buildings on both sides. Anonymous Attendee Great question - we will be diving into this as a part of the next phase of this planning process. More information and concepts for your feedback coming soon.

Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
63 The alleys along the rear of buildings that face ECR should be designed to allow auto access to future parking garages and services that may become part of future new buildings along ECR or new redesigned buildings along the East side of Laurel.. David Crabbe Thanks for your feedback! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
64 cherry st crossing is great, it's my preferred one to the train station Solomon Liu Thanks for sharing! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
65 ECR should be narowed to slow traffic and shorten pedestrian crossing time. Convert parking lanes into wider sidewalks and protcted bicycle lanes. Look at the current plans for ECR in Millbrae for ideas for how to improve ECR. David Crabbe Thank you for your suggestion! The City also has an adopted 2020 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan which provides a vision and projects for San Carlos streets, including El Camino Real. These recommendations are also Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner
66 You bet! Thanks for listening! Vince Gritsch
67 Consider high speed public broadband like Chatanooga , TN, to attract more of the work from home people into the envisioned public space, at other times. Gladwyn d'Souza Thanks for the suggestion! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
68 What metrics are being tracked to evaluate outcomes? Solomon Liu 69 That was a great forum and meeting - thank you gregstclaire Thanks for participating! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
70 Underground as much of the utilities as possible Mike Pardini Thanks for sharing! Akanksha Chopra (CDD -
Advance Planning)
71 Well done meeting for public and informed participation Gladwyn d'Souza Thank you! Megan Wooley-Ousdahl#
Senior Planner

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1559
Slido Question User Name Sentiment Submission Date Submission Time Not a question. I will have to bet that fountains are frowned upon in the era of California droughts. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:21:31 I thought that the council voted 2 years ago that the 700 block would be permanently closed to traffic. Is that not the case? Sal Burns neutral 02/15/2023 19:24:09
Need special attention to easy bicycle access too. Don’t exclude e-bikes and bikes; actively invite them to the center of downtown safely! Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 19:24:27 Give us the poll questions please Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:24:59 Preservation of the existing trees Richard neutral 02/15/2023 19:28:19 I was trying to edit my response to the first question from “shade” to “trees” but I got cut off and cannot go back to it Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:28:55
I love sidewalk dining outside! Richard positive 02/15/2023 19:30:22 the outdoor dining setups in the 700 block obstruct visual access to the other businesses (shops & salon). Has that been addressed with those business owners? Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:34:31 I love all the parklets and outdoor dining. I do think there should be a single lane for cars to pass each direction. Heidi positive 02/15/2023 19:35:12 Whether or not I support closing the 700 block permanently depends on what accessibility measures are included. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:35:33 More sidewalk dining with at least a single one way lane open to traffic Richard neutral 02/15/2023 19:35:48 There’s no chat, only Q&A Heidi 02/15/2023 19:36:23
Keep small town feel by having 1-story buildings that makes the street "walkable" Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:36:27 Are the restaurants that have expanded their setups massively paying for occupying public space? The menu prices have surged at all restaurants Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:37:12 Please preserve & maximize landscaping. We need more tree canopy, not less. Heidi positive 02/15/2023 19:41:20 Harrington park V2- Love the fountain in that location! Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 19:42:41 700 block doesn’t need to close completely to keep and expand outdoor dining & gathering Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:43:49 Outdoor movies, etc. can take place on that current parking lot or in Burton Park. I like the idea of using that parking lot for this sort of thing too Heidi positive 02/15/2023 19:46:29 Restaurants need to be reigned in and not overtaking all of the sidewalks. Need walk ways or clear areas to walk Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:46:55 What about more shops and stores instead of food places? Also am missing the laundromat for bulky items. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:49:09 Fountains recycle water and are incredibly peaceful. Most major cities with incredible community gathering spaces have them. Sal Burns positive 02/15/2023 19:51:43 I wish by landscaping it’s specified things like planters, especially in place of the ugly orange boulders Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:52:00 Street parking is a waste of space and make our streets more unsafe. Any necessary parking should be consolidated in parking structures. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:52:30 having to walk down the middle of the street means hotter and no shade on warm days. And Windy and no shelter on cold days Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:52:35 I’d like flowers as landscaping, not lawn. They’re grouped together however Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:52:47 would love to see possibility for some smaller, local businesses. The rents on laurel are crazy. would love to see the city help them out Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 19:53:02 I would like to see more of the following in Downtown: Wider sidewalks, Less street parking Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:54:09

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1560
Slido Question User Name Sentiment Submission Date Submission Time 30 years ago the City removed & replace “mature” trees, now there is talk of replacing the trees again, !Hugh!, we must protect our heritage tree lined streets! Richard neutral 02/15/2023 19:55:04 Please let’s not remove trees, if activities need open space, let’s use that parking lot Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:56:12 Let’s underground all those power lines & phone lines Heidi negative 02/15/2023 19:57:57 While we’re at let’s underground all those obnoxious utility lines & poles Richard negative 02/15/2023 19:57:58 Let’s use gray water for the landscaping Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:58:18 Improve alleys to accommodate traffic & parking impacted by closing 700 block for more sidewalk dining Richard neutral 02/15/2023 20:00:28 Crosswalks can be improved by having them raised to sidewalk level instead of dropping to street level. Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 20:02:21 Please prioritize use of locally native species for trees and other landscaping. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:04:03 flexible closure: there is no outside dining? Yay Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:04:55 Losing 63 parking spots is not a trade off. Do it! Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:06:17 Please DO NOT harm the legacy trees within the heritage sidewalk dimensions! Richard positive 02/15/2023 20:07:25 Restaurants invested a lot of money in beautifying their dining parklets, such as Town. Others were reluctant to do this, afraid to lose their investment Heidi negative 02/15/2023 20:11:08 A lot of the existing street trees need to be better maintained if left. Most trees downtown are infected with aphids or other insects that drop on the ground Mike pardini negative 02/15/2023 20:12:33 Let’s lose the parking, keep one lane each way for cars, keep wide sidewalks & dining spaces Heidi negative 02/15/2023 20:12:57 Not all Laurel St. stores have alley access for deliveries. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:15:22 Q11: interesting/useful shops, entertainment events, free or low cost local transit Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 20:15:46 Other: I will go downtown more if there is adequate, safe bicycle parking and I can enjoy dining, shopping and socializing in a car-free environment Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 20:16:16 Question 11 : I’d come downtown more if there was informal street music , like in New Orleans. Creates great ambiance and atmosphere.Adds charm and energy. Jennifer positive 02/15/2023 20:16:48 When will there be a decision about closing 700 block permanently? Is it a city vote? A city council vote? Is there a timeline? Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:17:45
Making 700 block only as a whole plaza may attract more people but only to that block and lose sight of renewing the entire downtown as a whole. Imbalanced! Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:18:42 The plaza option does not show how the restaurants with current outdoor dining would be located Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:19:37 Why is 700 block being treated as special vs the whole downtown? Sounds like the 700 block is the only downtown. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:22:52
I agree, crossing El Camino Real is scary. Can we have a pedestrian bridge? Heidi negative 02/15/2023 20:24:30 Don't think you can address the 700 block by itself. Restaurants parklets are on several blocks each way and must be uniform. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:25:50
This creates an unfair advantage for 700 block restaurants so assume they will be assessed initially and ongoing Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:26:55 Specially protecting the existing trees on Laurel is the question at hand Richard neutral 02/15/2023 20:31:00 Can we enable permanent park lifts for the entirety of Laurel Street for sidewalk, dining and other activities, trees, and flowers? Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 20:32:40

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1561
San Carlos PPT Questions
13 - 16 Feb 2023
Poll results

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1562
Table of contents
1) Looking at these inspirational photos, and keeping in mind other places you’ve been, in your opinion what is the most important element or feature you would like us to incorporate into the downtown Vision? (one word answers) 2) Think back to some of your most unforgettable experience in the public realm – what was it about that space that made it unforgettable? What was the experience like? How did it make you feel? (one word)
3) Why do you currently go to Downtown San Carlos?
4) When you go the 700 block, today, what draws you there? Specifically, what is the reason you currently go to this location? (One word answer.) 5) The City has been hearing many comments and support for closing the 700 block permanently. Do you agree yes or no?
6) What is your highest priority for public spaces in the downtown area? (Select one.) 7) Please rank the amenities in order of importance to you in the downtown core. (Rank all where #1 is the MOST important.)
8) I would like to see more of the following in Downtown (select all that apply):
9) What types of programs or entertainment would you

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1563
Table of contents
like to see downtown? (Select all that apply.)
10) Which is your preferred 700 block option?
11) I would go downtown more often __________. (Select two.)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1564
Wordcloud poll
1) Looking at these inspirational photos, and keeping in mind other places you’ve been, in your opinion what is the most important element or feature you would like us to incorporate into the downtown Vision? (one word answers)
0 5 2
Gathering
Walkability
safety Inviting Seating
Large trees
Dining
Accessibility
water feature
variety
inclusive
easy
creativity
clean
accessible
Whimsy
Walking
Usability
Trees
Smalltownfeel
Sidewalks
Shade
People
Paths
OpenSpace
Modernize
Modern
Humancentric
Gatherings
Fountain
Foliage
Focalpoint
Community
Comfort
Colorful
Closed 700 block
Car free
Bicycles
Activity

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1565
Wordcloud poll
2) Think back to some of your most unforgettable experience in the public realm – what was it about that space that made it unforgettable? What was the experience like? How did it make you feel? (one word) 0 5 5
Vibrant
Welcoming
Nature
Inviting
Community Clean
comfortable
Trees
Cozy
relaxed
peoplewatching
openwalkway
nature/green
innovative
fun
architectural
Wellbeing
Spacious
SmallTown
Safety Size
Relaxing
Live music
Inclusive
Flowery Food
Eating outside
Connected
Charming
Charm
Awestruck
Atmosphere
Artistic
Art
Activity
Active

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1566
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
3) Why do you currently go to Downtown San
Carlos?
(1/2)
0 5 7
Eat
91 %
Shop
82 %
Work
19 %
Services (auto repair, tailor, nail salon, etc.)
47 %
Farmers Market or Special Events
68 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1567
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
3) Why do you currently go to Downtown San
Carlos?
(2/2)
0 5 7
To catch the Train or bus on ECR
33 %
I live Downtown
4 %
To visit Laurel Street
56 %
None of the above
0 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1568
Wordcloud poll
4) When you go the 700 block, today, what draws you there? Specifically, what is the reason you currently go to this location? (One word answer.) 0 5 6 Restaurants
Carfree
DiningShops
Town Restaurant
Shop
Outdoordining
Nothing
stroll
reading bug
eating
banking
Walking on street
Stores
Restaurant
Readingbug
Outside dining
Outing
Harrington Park
Getaway
Farmers market
Drinks
Dog friendly dining
Crowded
Coffee
Bank

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1569
Multiple-choice poll
5) The City has been hearing many comments
and support for closing the 700 block
permanently. Do you agree yes or no?
0 5 3
Yes
77 %
No
23 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1570
Multiple-choice poll
6) What is your highest priority for public spaces
in the downtown area? (Select one.)
0 5 5
I want to enjoy a public space and the sense of community 62 %
I want to go somewhere with my kids
5 %
I want to be able to eat lunch outside
18 %
I would like events and programs
15 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1571
Ranking poll
7) Please rank the amenities in order of
importance to you in the downtown core. (Rank
all where #1 is the MOST important.)
(1/2)
0 5 1

1. Tree canopy

6.43 2. Open air with some shade covering

6.22 3. Lawn or landscaping

5.33 4. Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)

5.22 5. Stage/music venue

4.86 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1572
Ranking poll
7) Please rank the amenities in order of
importance to you in the downtown core. (Rank
all where #1 is the MOST important.)
(2/2)
0 5 1

5. Bistro lighting

4.86 7. Public Art

4.77 8. Fountain/ Water feature

3.88 9. Area where children can play

3.43 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1573
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
8) I would like to see more of the following in
Downtown (select all that apply):
(1/2)
0 6 0
Outdoor dining
48 %
Street furnishings
68 %
Plazas
73 %
Public art
68 %
Wayfinding (signs w/direction, distance)
30 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1574
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
8) I would like to see more of the following in
Downtown (select all that apply):
(2/2)
0 6 0
Street trees
70 %
Bicycle parking
35 %
Other
8 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1575
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
9) What types of programs or entertainment
would you like to see downtown? (Select all that
apply.)
(1/2)
0 6 3
Music events
75 %
Kid friendly programs
41 %
Theater/Performance pop up events
62 %
Cultural or art exhibits
70 %
Movies on the plaza/square
46 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1576
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
9) What types of programs or entertainment
would you like to see downtown? (Select all that
apply.)
(2/2)
0 6 3
Activities/yoga, tai chi, qi gong
35 %
Chess, backgammon, game night
37 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1577
Multiple-choice poll
10) Which is your preferred 700 block option? 0 6 4
Flexible Closure
9 %
Widened Sidewalk
22 %
Plaza Option
64 %
Pre-2020 Option
5 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1578
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
11) I would go downtown more often __________.
(Select two.)
0 6 7
If there was a permanent plaza / public gathering spaces 75 %
If there were wider sidewalks with adjacent parking
27 %
If I could drive down the 700 block, like before 2020
12 %
For Farmer’s Market and for other cool /fun events
64 %
Other
7 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1579
Coffee and Comments Open House
March 4, 2023

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1580
Coffee and Comments
March 4, 2023

As a follow-up to the community workshop held on February 15, the City of San Carlos held a Coffee and Comments Open House at the San Carlos Library Community Room on Saturday, March 4, 2023. Over 70 community members joined City staff for coffee and pastries and gave their feedback on preliminary concepts for the future of downtown San Carlos.

Lisa Porras, Planning Manager for the Advance Planning Division, gave two presentations, one at 10:15am and the second one at 11:15am. The community members had an opportunity to ask staff questions, view the exhibits, share ideas, comments, and feedback on three preliminary concepts for downtown San Carlos. These included improvements to alleyways, the 700 Block of Laurel Street, Harrington Park, and a new plaza off the 600 Block of Laurel Street.

Open House Materials:
• Presentation
• Community Feedback

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1581
Welcome!
Coffee and Comments, March 4 2023

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1582
Downtown Specific Plan Team

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1583
Al Savay, AICP
Community & Economic Development Director
City of San Carlos
Lisa Porras, AICP
Planning Manager, Advance Planning Division
City of San Carlos
City Team
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, AICP
Senior Planner, Advance Planning Division
Meghan Riddlespurgher
Associate Planner, Current Planning Division
Akanksha Chopra, AICP
Associate Planner, Advance Planning Division
www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com
Linnet Kwok
Senior Administrative Clerk, Advance Planning Division
Eliza Bailey
Assistant Planner, Good City Co.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1584
DTAC Meeting Agenda
Share your perspectives.

Coffee and Comments

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1585
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Project Overview
What is the Downtown Specific
Plan and what can it do?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1586
General Plan
• City’s long-term vision for the future
• Goals, policies, objectives that guide physical
development
Zoning Ordinance
• Establishes land uses and development standards
Specific Plan
• Must be consistent with General Plan
• Provides a vision and direction for a specific area
• Provides a customized regulatory framework
• Takes precedence over standards set by the Zoning Ordinance

GENERAL PLAN

ZONING CODE

SPECIFIC
PLAN
What is a Specific Plan?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1587
Establishes:
• Private Realm – land uses and development
standards
• Public Realm – mobility, streetscape
beautification, plaza, alley, and
infrastructure improvements and urban
design concepts
• Implementation actions and programs
• Development approval authority, processes,
and streamlining
What is a Specific Plan?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1588
The Downtown Specific Plan Area

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1589
Public Engagement
• Stakeholder Meetings and Focus Groups
• City Council Member 1-on-1 Meetings
• 4 DTAC Meetings (June, July, September
2022 & January 2023)
• Two Community Workshops (August 2022;
Feb. 2023)
• Coffee and Comments + Online Survey

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1590
What We’ve Heard So Far
Downtown San Carlos in one word.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1591
What We’ve Heard So Far
Beautification, Street Trees, & Landscaping
Make street closure more attractive and permanent
More Outdoor Gathering Spaces & Seating Areas
Support for outdoor dining and gathering space at Laurel Plaza Enhance Alleyways
Support for organizing the alleyways, making them more user friendly Improve Sidewalks
Desire for wider sidewalks for pedestrians, so there is greater separation from traffic on busy streets.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1592
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Preliminary Urban Design
and Placemaking Concepts

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1593
Preliminary Concepts
13 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1594
Urban Design / Placemaking
Today’s Exhibit Themes:
• Public Space Elements
• Alley Improvements
• Street Closure on 700 Block of Laurel
Street
Source: Katja Dillmann

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1595
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Imagining the Future
of Downtown San Carlos

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1596
Imagining the Future of Downtown
“Performance Stair,” Wellmont Arts Plaza, Montclair, New Jersey

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1597
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Courthouse Square, Redwood City Wellmont Arts Plaza, Montclair, New Jersey

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1598
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Fountain of Rings, Atlanta, GA Riverview Park, Shreveport, LA

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1599
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Bloor Yorkville, Toronto, Canada Vanke Sanlin, Shanghai

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1600
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Berczy Plaza, Toronto, Canada Barri Gòtic (Gothic Quarter), Barcelona, Spain

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1601
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Barri Gòtic (Gothic Quarter), Barcelona, Spain

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1602
Imagining the Future of Downtown
Montreal, Canada Quebec, Canada

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1603
Imagining Downtown: Your thoughts?
❖ Looking at these inspirational photos, and keeping in mind other places you’ve been, in your opinion what is the most important element or feature you would like us to incorporate into the downtown Vision?
❖ Think back to some of your most unforgettable experience in the public realm – what was it about that space that made it unforgettable? What was the experience like? How did it make you feel?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1604
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Enjoy the exhibit.

Share your perspectives.

Ask us questions.

A good plan involves everyone.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1605
What’s coming up next?
❖Review Urban Design and Placemaking Concepts
▪ 2
nd Online Survey – March 1st through April 1st
▪ Planning Commission (spring 2023)
▪ City Council (spring 2023)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1606
We are here

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1607
sancarlosdowntownplan.com
Questions? Email us at [email protected] Thank you for joining us today!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1608
Downtown Specific Plan
City of San Carlos
March 4, 2023
Coffee and Comments Open House
Feedback Summary

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1609
2 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Background
As a follow up to virtual community workshop held on February 15, the City hosted an in-person Coffee and Comments Open House for the Downtown Specific Plan on March 4th, 2023 between 10 am to 12 pm at the City Library at 610 Elm Street.

The open house presented an additional opportunity to collect feedback from the community on three preliminary concepts related to placemaking and urban design. These concepts included improvements to alleyways, the 700 Block of Laurel Street, Harrington Park, and a new plaza off the 600 Block of Laurel Street. There were two presentations by Lisa Porras, Planning Manager, for the Advance Planning Division - one at 10:15 am and the second one at 11:15 am.

Over 70 community members joined City staff for coffee and pastries and had an opportunity to ask staff questions, view the exhibits, share ideas, and give their feedback.

In March 2022, the City of San Carlos kicked-off the process to work with the community to create a new vision for Downtown San Carlos, including Laurel Street, El Camino Real, and the cross streets from Holly Street to Greenwood Avenue. This project, called the “Downtown Specific Plan,” will build upon what’s best and most loved about Downtown San Carlos, and take a close look at what needs updating or changing.

This process will last about two years, with completion targeted in spring 2024.

Event Overview

COFFEE AND COMMENTS OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1610
3 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Community Feedback by Themes
Closure on Laurel
• Community members want City to think big and bold in terms of vision for Downtown.
• Resounding support for extending closure of Laurel Street to all blocks, not just 700 Block.
• The community likes the walkable space currently on Laurel and supports extending it between Arroyo and San Carlos, and Walnut between San Carlos Ave and Cherry.
• People like having a street that is walkable and supports pedestrian activities like places to sit and have coffee.
• A few community members felt full closure plaza would be overdone.

Building Heights
• Some community members suggested keeping heights low along Laurel and maintaining a “small town” feel. One idea was to focus height along El Camino, not Laurel.
• Other comments supported taller buildings with wider space between. The idea that taller buildings create shaded streets which is desirable (“nobody wants to sit unshaded or unsheltered in the street.”).
• Public Space elements/design considerations
• Community wants more seating and gathering places with the space to feel more welcoming and inviting with greening and public art. • Support for welcoming and central gathering space e.g., Piazza, Square, and Plaza.
• Having events & space where the community can gather. • Places for kids to play while parents shop.
• Aesthetically pleasing strolling area or seating.
• Places for local artist/ musicians (not large bands) that provided an individualized “experience”.

Public Art
• Community also wants public art or community art as part of the spaces including artistic displays (Like umbrella street in Montreal). • Suggestion to utilize local artists to offer displays in space and to tie the space thematically to other planned areas or destinations like wine/brewery/art districts.
• Revitalize Alleys through “surprising/delightful” art to attar pedestrians.
• Invest in design concepts that inspire (unique lighting, seating, and signage).
• Fun street art for children to explore & discover, e.g., Hunt for mosaic animals, commemorative tiled, animal statues discretely placed.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1611
4 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Businesses
• Walkable, interesting/diverse businesses that are local. • Collection of local businesses, especially restaurants & cafes. • More new shops/cafes/ restaurants.
• Diversity of Businesses (Mom-n-Pop)
• Local business/ shops/cafes/ restaurants.
• Unique businesses that don’t make Laurel a food court.

Landscaping
• Making spaces inviting with greenery, trees, plants, etc. • Open green space.
• More hanging baskets, flowers.
• Native planting with signage for folks to learn about, the plant name, origin and fun fact.
• More tress and green space.

Biking and Micro-mobility
• Street that is friendly for bicycles including e-bikes. • Inviting and safe, e-bike & bicycle routes and infrastructure. • Safe bikes, micro mobility access.
• Dedicated bike lanes leading to and through downtown. • Add more explicit bicycle plans for complete routes downtown, e-bike parking next to plazas.

Amenities
• Public Bathrooms.
• Lighting & safety.
• Alleyway design and purpose.
• General sense of confusion as to what Alleyways are being designed for pedestrians, cars, or services?
• Suggestion to make Laurel Street people friendly and alleys traffic & parking friendly.
• Some people suggested to “keep alleys as alleys”.
• Put all services in one area on street that can have access to parking, i.e., North Laurel.

Parking
• Add parking with high density projects.
• Keep stage facing west. Fix City Hall Fountain before taking up sidewalk space on Laurel.
• Full Closure - no fountain in what street or sidewalk is now. Fix the fountain between the City Hall and the library instead.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1612
5 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1613
Community Survey #2
March 1, 2023 to April 30, 2023

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1614
Community Survey #2
This online survey for the Downtown Specific Plan was conducted between March 1st and April 30, 2023. It provided an opportunity for community members and stakeholders who may have missed the February 15 community workshop and the March 4 Coffee and Comments Open House to provide their feedback to the City. The survey results will help the City staff and consultant team develop placemaking concepts for 700 block of Laurel Street, Harrington Park, alleyways, and a future plaza along the 600 block of Laurel Street.

Survey 2 Summary:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1615
Downtown Specific Plan
City of San Carlos
March 1st - April 30th, 2023
Interactive Survey 2
Feedback Summary

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1616
2 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Project Background
In March 2022, the City of San Carlos kicked-off the process to work with the community to create a new vision for Downtown San Carlos, including Laurel Street, El Camino Real, and the cross streets from Holly Street to Greenwood Avenue. This project, called the “Downtown Specific Plan,” will build upon what’s best and most loved about Downtown San Carlos, and take a close look at what needs updating or changing.

Survey Overview
The online survey for the Downtown Area Plan was conducted between March 1st and April 30th, 2023. It provided another opportunity for community members and stakeholders that were unable to attend the February 15th community workshop and the Coffee and Comments Open House held on March 4, 2023. The survey results will help City staff and the consultant team shape concepts for 700 block of Laurel Street, Harrington Park, alleyways, and a future plaza along the 600 block of Laurel Street.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1617
3 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Q1: What is your preferred 700 Block option?

COMMUNITY SURVEY SUMMARY

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1618
4 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Q2: I would go downtown more often if _________
Permanent plaza or
public gathering spaces
Sidewalks with
adjacent parking
Could drive down
700 block
Farmer’s market and
special events
Other

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1619
5 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Q3: I would like to see more of the following downtown ______ Outdoor dining
Street furnishings
Plazas
Public Art
Wayfinding (signs
w/direction, distance)
Street trees
Bicycle parking
Other

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1620
6 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Q4: What types of programs or entertainment would you like to see downtown?
Music events
Kid friendly
programs
Theater/Performance pop
up events
Cultural or art exhibits
Movies on the plaza square
Activities/yoga, tai chi, qi
gong
Chess, backgammon,
game night

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1621
7 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Q5: What is your highest priority for public spaces in the downtown area?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1622
8 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Q6: Please rank the amenities in order of importance to you in the downtown core:

Trees and the shade trees
provide
Open air with some shade
covering
Movable furniture (tables,
chairs, umbrellas)
Bistro lighting
Area where children can
play
Lawn or landscaping
Stage/music venue
Fountain/water

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1623
9 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Q7: When you go to the 700 block, what draws you there? Specifically, what is the reason you visit?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1624
10 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1625
Status Update and Progress Report on
4/24/23 City Council Meeting

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1626
Status Update and Progress Report on City Council Meeting 4/24/2023 How will downtown transform over the next 20 years?
The public was invited to learn and share comments on important milestones in preparing a community-based vision for the future of downtown San Carlos. Presentations were given to the Planning and Transportation Commission on Monday, April 17 and to the City Council on Monday, April 24.

Both meetings started at 7 pm and was held inside City Council Chambers at San Carlos City Hall, located at 600 Elm Street.

The Downtown Specific Plan project kicked off in March 2022. Following two community-wide workshops, an open house, plus multiple meetings with a 18- member citizen-based committee, and gathering community feedback from two surveys, city staff is now ready to share what the community is saying and how they have responded to several foundational urban design concepts for downtown. These concepts include Laurel Street closure, the purpose-functionimprovements to alleys, design ideas for Harrington Park, and possibilities to create a new public plaza along the 600 block of Laurel Street.

The Planning and Transportation Commission and City Council provided city staff feedback, guidance, and direction on these fundamental components of the downtown area. Recommendations for additional design concepts for the 600 and 800 blocks of Laurel + roadways design for San Carlos Avenue and other roadways within the downtown area, plus parking strategies, will rely on these foundational concepts for downtown. Additional community workshops and surveys will be offered in the coming months and will address these future items.

The Downtown Specific Plan is targeted for completion by March 2024.

City Council April 24, 2023 Study Session materials below:
• Presentation
• Community Feedback Summary (June 2022 - April 2023)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1627
City Council
April 24, 2023
STUDY SESSION: Progress Report and Status
of the Downtown Specific Plan Project

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1628
DTAC Meeting Agenda

1. Meeting Purpose

2. Overview: Downtown Specific Plan Project

3. Community Outreach & Engagement

4. Current Items for Consideration

5. Response from the Community, Planning & Transportation Commission

6. Next Steps

7. City Council Discussion and Direction for Staff
Tonight’s Program

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1629
Meeting Purpose
To provide staff feedback, guidance, and direction on three fundamental components of the downtown area.

These foundational concepts include:
1) Laurel Street Closure, 700 Block
2) Content and programming for public gathering spaces, including:
• Harrington Park
• New public plaza, 600 Block of Laurel Street
3) Improvements to Alleys

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1630
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Overview of the
Downtown Specific Plan Project

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1631
Key items include:

Parking; Land Use; Urban Design and the Public Realm; Infrastructure; Street Closure; Formula Business Ordinance; Building Height; Building Façades, Shopfronts and overall Architecture; Community Events; Maintenance; Emergency Access; Traffic and Circulation: Walking, Biking, and all-inclusive Accessibility; Outdoor Dining; Parklets and Plazas; Funding, Phasing, and Implementation; Businesses; Chamber of Commerce; Private Development; Downtown BID; and Civic Engagement.

What will the Plan address?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1632
Specific Plan Area

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1633
A Range of Options to Consider
7 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1634
Multi-disciplinary Team

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1635
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Summary
Community Outreach &
Engagement

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1636
Community Outreach Methods

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1637
Community Engagement Summary

1. Spotlight Newsletter (Aug. 2021)

2. City Council Member 1-on-1 Meetings (spring
2022)

3. Focus Group Meetings (August 2022)

4. 4 DTAC Meetings (June 2022 – January 2023)

5. Community Workshop #1 (August 31, 2022)

6. Community Workshop #2 (February 15, 2023)

7. Coffee and Comments Open House (March 4,
2023)

8. Two Online Surveys
• (Interactive Mapping August 2022- Jan 2023
• Urban Design Concepts (March –April, 2023)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1638
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Current Items for Consideration:

1. Laurel Street Closure (700)

2. Public Gathering Spaces

3. Alleys

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1639
Urban Design / Placemaking
Laurel Street

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1640
Laurel Street – 700 Block, 4 Options

1. Flexible Closure Option:

Aesthetic improvements, Temporary in nature, but removable

2. Widened Sidewalk Option:

Open to motorists, with widened sidewalks, two travel lanes, parallel parking

3. Plaza Option:

Full Closure; designed as a public plaza, outdoor gathering space

4. Pre-2020 Option:

Eliminate Street Closure – open to cars as it was pre-pandemic

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1641
700 Block, Laurel St.: Flexible Closure Option
Temporary, with aesthetic improvements
New street furnishings and lighting, possible intermittent hours or events 1

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1642
700 Block, Laurel St.: Flexible Closure Option
Source: Al Savay Source: Al Savay
1 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1643
700 Block, Laurel St.: Flexible Closure Option
Trade-Offs:
• Loss of 63 parking spaces
• Lacks full benefits of
permanent street closure
• Intermittent traffic disruption -
motorists must remember
closure if hours are changed
Advantages:
• Maximum Flexibility
• Allows a variety of businesses to
activate space on a temporary
basis
• Facilitates community-building
• Improves pedestrian access
1 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1644
700 Block, Laurel St.: Widened Sidewalk Option
Enhanced pedestrian environment, two travel lanes, retains some parking 2

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1645
Two travel lanes, retains some parking
Source: City of Ventura
Source: Katja Dillmann
Laurel Street – 700 Block - Widened Sidewalk
2 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1646
Trade-Offs:
• Loss of large community
space
• Loss of 20 parking spaces
Advantages:
• Expanded sidewalks with street
furniture and lighting
• Pedestrians are retail adjacent
• Additional room for sidewalk dining
• Maintains vehicle access and
adjacent parking
700 Block, Laurel St.: Widened Sidewalk Option
2 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1647
700 Block, Laurel St.: Plaza Option
Full closure, space is converted into a Plaza
3 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1648
700 Block, Laurel St.: Plaza Option
Source: Al Savay Source: Al Savay
3 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1649
700 Block, Laurel St.: Plaza Option
Trade-Offs:
• Loss of 63 parking spaces
• Delivery required from alley
• No vehicle visibility
• Minor traffic disruption
• Potential emergency access
delays
Advantages:
• Dedicated community space
• Downtown plaza becomes a
destination
• More space for retail, dining, and
public space
• No limits on amenities, lighting,
and special paving
3 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1650
700 Block, Laurel St.: Pre-2020 Option
Eliminate Street Closure
Open to cars as it was pre-2020 4

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1651
Trade-Offs:
• Lose a community asset
• Lose outdoor dining
opportunity
• Lose flexibility of using space
Advantages:
• No loss of parking
• No new impact on how motorists
navigate the Downtown
• No user confusion
700 Block, Laurel St.: Pre-2020 Option
4 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1652
Urban Design / Placemaking
Public Gathering Spaces

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1653
Possible Public Space Elements
• Fountain/ Water feature
• Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)
• Lawn or landscaping
• Area where children can play
• Stage/music venue
• Open air with some shade covering
• Tree canopy
• Bistro lighting
• Public art

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1654
Urban Design/Placemaking - Public Spaces
• New Plaza Opportunity, 600 Block Laurel St.
• Harrington Park

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1655
Proposed
Plaza
600 Block Laurel Street
Wheeler Plaza
Location of Potential Future Public Plaza – 600 Block of Laurel Street Walnut Street
Cherry Street

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1656
Ideas for New Plaza 600 Block Laurel
Retail & Restaurant Development with a Small Plaza Space Source: City of San Carlos Source: Al Savay

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1657
Ideas for New Plaza 600 Block Laurel
Large Plaza Space
Source: iStock
Source: Al Savay

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1658
Harrington Park Concepts

1. Park & Plaza

2. All Plaza

3. Music & Stage

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1659
Harrington Park: Park & Plaza

1. Wood Beams and Lighting

2.Nature Play Area

3.Vines/Wall Screen

4.Fountain

5. Tree/Planter/Seat Wall

6. Memorial or Art Feature

7. Memorial Wall

8. Archway Entrance

9. Alley Access and Signage

10. Tables and
Chairs/Umbrellas
1 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1660
Harrington Park: Park & Plaza
1 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1661
Harrington Park: All Plaza

1. Bistro Lighting

2.Special Paving & Seating Area

3.Vines/Wall Screen

4.Fountain

5. Tree/Planter/Seat Wall

6. Special Paving Into Laurel St.

7. Memorial Wall/ Art Wall

8. Alley Access and Wayfinding
2 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1662
Harrington Park: All Plaza
2 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1663
Harrington Park: Music & Stage

1. Shade sails

2.Special Paving & Seating Area

3.Vines/Wall Screen

4. Stage

5. Tree/Planter/Seat Wall

6. Memorial Wall

7. Archway Entrance

8. Alley Access & Signage

9. Bistro Lighting
3 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1664
Harrington Park: Music & Stage
3 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1665
Urban Design / Placemaking
Alley Improvements

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1666
Alley Network

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1667
Today’s Alleys
• Lack of signage
• Lack of lighting and can feel unsafe
• Individual trash receptacles clutter
• No clear pedestrian path of travel
• Service / delivery congestion
• Private / public parking confusion
• Lack/minimal handicap accessible
(ADA) parking
• Lack of bike parking and connectivity

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1668
Proposed Enhancements
• Wayfinding
• Dedicated pedestrian paths of travel
• Dedicated delivery areas
• Dedicated trash receptacle areas
• Clearly denoted public parking
• Clearly marked ADA parking
• Bike parking and connectivity
• Pedestrian Scale / Street Lighting
• Alley Art / Mural Program

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1669
Alley Enhancement: Gateways
Existing: El Camino Real Alley from Laurel St. Proposed: El Camino Real Alley from Laurel St.

A. Gateway Feature
B. Special Parking Lot
Pavement
C. Level Sidewalk Crossing
D. Rolled Curb
E. Mural Wall Opportunity
F. Decorative Street Light
G. Truncated Dome
Example gateway feature

KEY MAP

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1670
Alley Enhancement: Crossings SAN CARLOS AVE.

Example decorative crosswalk

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1671
CHERRY
Alley Enhancement: Pedestrian Paths
Existing: Parking between B of A and US Banks Proposed: Parking between B of A and US Banks A. Flush Concert Edge
B. Special Parking Lot
Pavement – Ped Route
C. Wayfinding
OLIVE

KEY MAP
Example wayfinding

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1672
Alley Enhancement: Murals, Decor

KEY MAP
Existing: Alley near Cherry St. and Laurel St.

Example alleyway mural
A. Decorative Wayfinding
Signage
B. Special Paving
C. Lighting
D. Rolled Curb
E. Mural Wall Opportunity
Proposed: Alley near Cherry St. and Laurel St.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1673
Alleys: Examples
Source: RRM Design Group Source: Google Maps
Source: Google Maps

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1674
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Response from Community

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1675
700 Block, Laurel St: Preferences
Workshop #2
• Plaza:……………………………….64% of respondents
• Widened Sidewalk:…………..22% of respondents
• Flexible Closure:…………………9% of respondents
• Pre-2020 Configuration:……..5% of respondents
DTAC
• Plaza:………………………………..91% of respondents
• Pre-2020 Configuration:……..9% of respondents
Open House & Survey
• Full closure plaza option received the most votes.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1676
What people are saying….

DTAC (Jan. 25, 2023):
• 92% would visit downtown if there was a permanent plaza • They would like to see more street furnishings
• Music events, cultural and art exhibits
• Want to eat outside
• Priority for public spaces: events and programs
• Open air spaces with shade coverings
Workshop (Feb. 15, 2023)
• “Gathering, Inviting, Walkable” – most important for the downtown vision • People want to enjoy public spaces and the sense of community it brings • Tree canopies; open air with shade coverings
• Bistro lighting, street trees
• Music events and cultural or art exhibits

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1677
What people are saying….

Coffee and Comments (March 4, 2023):
• People want to enjoy public spaces and the sense of community it can bring • Strong preference for open air spaces with shade coverings, tree canopies • More outdoor dining, street trees, bistro lighting and public art • Top activities desired: music, cultural & art exhibits, and movies on the plaza • Would go downtown more often if there was a permanent plaza and more public gathering spaces
Survey (March 1 – April)
• Highest priority for public spaces: want to be able to enjoy public space and the sense of community it brings
• Plaza option/full closure for 700 block of Laurel
• Trees and open air with shade coverings
• Moveable furniture, bistro lighting
• Top activities desired: Music and cultural events

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1678
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Response from Planning &
Transportation Commission

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1679
Response from PTC
700 Block, Laurel:

Closure/full plaza option
▪ 3 Commissioners
Widened-Sidewalk
▪ 2 Commissioners
(1 said not opposed to full plaza)
Public Gathering Spaces:
▪ Redesign Harrington Park
▪ New plaza, larger/open plaza, as beautiful gateway
to/from Wheeler Plaza
▪ Design for music, stage, sunshades, trees, water
features, lighting
Alleys
Crucial for success of Laurel closure
▪ Tidy up, include awnings, signage, public art, archways, wayfinding, special paving
▪ Alleys will have to do “everything”
▪ Business access, truck deliveries, parking for motorists, bicyclists, safe pathways to Laurel Street/El Camino Real, ingress/egress for future housing
▪ Need a functional plan, set priorities for the alleys

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1680
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
Next Steps

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1681
Gateway Moment: 1100 San Carlos Avenue
55 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1682
600 and 800 Blocks, Laurel Street
56 600 Block, Laurel Street
800 Block, Laurel Street

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1683
Next Phase
57 • Evolution of other blocks: 1100 – 1200 San Carlos Avenue; 600 and 800 Laurel Street
• Pedestrian Improvements
• Bicycle Facilities
• Proposed Mobility Improvements
• Placemaking and Beautification
• Alley Network and Public Parking
• Sustainable Practices & Resiliency

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1684

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1685
Questions for the City Council
• Should the 700 block be turned into a full plaza?
• Is there agreement on design elements for public spaces (i.e. Harrington Park and new plaza at 600 block of Laurel?
• Is there agreement that alleys should be improved with new surface materials, lighting, gateway features, landscaping and murals?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1686
Tonight’s Agenda DTAC Meeting Agenda
▪ Questions for Staff, Consultants?
▪ Public Comment
▪ Council Discussion

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1687
www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com
Thank you!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1688
City Council
Questions

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1689

PUBLIC COMMENT
**CITY COUNCIL – April 24, 2023**
If you would like to make a public comment on an item on Agenda Item 11a, Downtown Specific Plan Design Concepts, now is the time to speak :

1. Fill out a Request to Speak Form located in the back of the Council Chambers and submit to City Staff; or you may raise your hand when the PTC Chair calls for public comments

2. Join the Zoom meeting (https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88635467439 Or call 1-669-900-9128 and enter the Meeting ID: 886 35467439). Virtually raise your hand by clicking on the “Raise Hand” icon at the bottom of your screen. If joining by phone, press *9; *6 to unmute when called upon.

Two Minute Timer:

In the interest of full disclosure,
please note if you are a paid representative/advocate for any item you’ll be commenting on.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1690
City Council
Discussion

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1691
Downtown Specific Plan
City of San Carlos
March 2022 - April 2023
Community Engagement Phase 1 & Phase 2
Feedback Summary

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1692
2 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Project Background
Cumulatively Phase 1 and Phase 2 public engagement spans from the commencement of the project, approximately in March 2022, through the close of the Phase 2 survey at the end of April 2023 (the results of ongoing survey will be compiled after close of survey on April 30th). The public engagement activities for these phases included: Focus Group meetings, an Online Questionnaire (Social Pinpoint), Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC) meetings, Community Workshops, and an Online Survey.

The public engagement activities are listed below in chronological order:

Phase 1 Community Engagement

1. Spotlight Newsletter (Aug 24, 2022)

2..DTAC Orientation (Jun 22, 2022) and Special Meeting (Jul 13, 2022)

3. Focus Group Meetings (Aug, 2022)

4. Community Workshop # 1 (Aug 31, 2022)

5. DTAC Meeting # 1 (Sept 13, 2022)

6. Social Pinpoint - Interactive Mapping Survey
(Aug 8, 2022 - Jan 15, 2023)
Phase 2 Community Engagement

1. DTAC Meeting # 2 (Jan 25, 2023)

2. Community Workshop # 2 (Feb 15, 2023)

3. Coffee and Comments Open House (Mar 4, 2023)

4. Online Survey - Preliminary Design Concepts (Mar 1 - Apr 30, 2023) In March 2022, the City of San Carlos kicked-off the process to work with the community to create a new vision for Downtown San Carlos, including Laurel Street, El Camino Real, and the cross streets from Holly Street to Greenwood Avenue. This project, called the “Downtown Specific Plan,” will build upon what’s best and most loved about Downtown San Carlos, and take a close look at what needs updating or changing. This process, which is divided in five phases, will last about two years, with completion targeted in Spring 2024.

This is a summary of the outreach completed during Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the development of the Downtown Specific Plan. This summary will provide a record and foundation for the outreach to be conducted in the upcoming phases of this planning process. The direct feedback from the community and raw data is attached as appendices to this summary.

Public Engagement Overview

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1693
3 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
A. Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC) Meetings
In forming the Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC), the desire was to have a variety of stakeholder interests represented. The empaneled 18-member DTAC, along with the stakeholder category they represent, is listed in Table 1 below.

The engagement activities in this summary are organized by following categories:

A. Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC) meetings
B. Focus Group meetings
C. Community Workshops and Community Open House
D. Community Surveys
E. Spotlight Newsletter
Public Engagement Summary
Table 1: Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC) Members and Representing Category

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1694
4 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
DTAC Orientation Meeting (Jun 22, 2022)
The purpose of this meeting was to welcome the DTAC members and give them an orientation to the project and their roles and responsibilities. The City Attorney, Greg Rubens, gave an overview of the Brown Act and Public Records Requests.

DTAC Special Meeting (Jul 13, 2022)
The purpose of this meeting was to provide DTAC members with an introduction to planning for a downtown.

Al Savay gave a presentation on “Reimagining Main Street, What Makes Downtown Special?”. Following this, DTAC members mingled and participated in an ice breaker to share two things they appreciated about the downtown and two things that they would like to see happen in the downtown.

DTAC Meeting # 1 (Sept 13, 2022)
The September DTAC meeting included an overview of existing conditions and the market analysis study, a recap of the Community Workshop and an interactive Slido exercise with similar questions to those posed via Slido at the Community Workshop.

In response to the Slido question, “Which of the following improvements would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos,” 100% of the DTAC respondents indicated, “Beautification, street trees, and landscaping”, with 93% of DTAC respondents stating, “Additional outdoor gathering/seating areas (plazas, pocket parks, paseos, etc.)”, and 79% would like to see “enhanced outdoor dining areas.” In response to the Slido question, “How do you typically get around Downtown San Carlos? (check all that apply)”, 87% of DTAC respondents indicated Walk/Assistive devices, 67% of DTAC respondents indicated drive and 13% indicated Bike/e-bike.

In response to, “Which of the following mobility improvements would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check all that apply)”, 100% of DTAC respondents indicated enhancements to alleyways, 87% of respondents indicated improved sidewalks, 67% indicated enhanced pedestrian crossings, 53% indicated additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks, and 47% indicated better access to the Caltrain Station.

Photos from Ice Cream Social at DTAC meeting on July 13, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1695
5 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
In response to, “If you parked once and walked around, how far are you willing to walk to your destination? (select your preferred distance)”, 47% of DTAC respondents indicated a 10-minute walk and 27% indicated a 5-minute walk.

DTAC Meeting #2 (Jan 25, 2023)
The fourth DTAC meeting took place virtually on January 25, 2023. The agenda included a project overview/ update and a sharing of the Urban Design/Placemaking Concepts. The meeting included several interactive polling questions, asked using the Slido platform.

The Urban Design/Placemaking Concepts agenda item included an overview of the four treatment options for the 700 Block of Laurel, public space elements, and alley improvements.

In response to the question, “Which is your preferred 700 block option?”, with the answer choices being Flexible Closure, Widened Sidewalk, Plaza Option, and Pre-2020 Option, 91% indicated Plaza Option and 9% indicated Pre-2020 Option.

In response to the question, “I would go downtown more often (select 2)”, 92% selected if “there was a permanent plaza” and 83% selected if “I could go for Farmer’s Market and special events.” In response to, “What is your highest priority for public spaces in the downtown area?”, 38% of respondents selected, “I would like to go to events and programs” and 31% selected, “I want to be able to eat lunch outside.”
DTAC members were asked to rank the amenities in the downtown core in the order of importance, taking all responses into account, the ranking of amenities was as follows:

1. Open air with shade covering

2. Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)

3. Stage/music venue

4. Lawn or Landscaping

5. Tree canopy

6. Area where children can play

7. Bistro lighting

8. Fountain/ Water Feature
The results to the Slido poll indicate a strong desire for a permanent street closure for the 700-block of Laurel Street which results in a plaza, and a desire for programmed activities in the downtown core of San Carlos.

Refer to Appendix A for meeting minutes from DTAC meetings.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1696
6 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Mobility (Aug 22, 2022)
Abraham Sheppard, Senior Urban Designer, RRM and Brian Canepa, Principal, W-Trans staffed the Mobility Focus Group meeting which convened on August 22, 2022. Attendees included:
• Heather Wolnick, Community Organizer, Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition
• Sonia Elkes, Founder, San Carlos Bikes
• Thomas Feledy, Former Planning Commissioner
• Jessica Epstein, Government and Community Affairs Manager, SamTrans
• Gwen Buckley, Senior Planner, SamTrans
• Mark Leong, District Branch Chief, Caltrans
• Laurel Sears, Associate Transportation Planner, Caltrans • Mark Bauhaus, Bike advocate
• Karen, Healthy Cities Tutoring
Take Aways: A desire for safer crossings across El Camino Real was heard, as well as a desire for more robust bicycle infrastructure and more secure bicycle parking.

B. Focus Group Meetings
A series of stakeholder interviews were conducted in August 2022. This included 20 stakeholders, grouped into 4 Focus Groups: Infrastructure, Mobility, Seniors-Children-Special Needs, and Downtown Business and Events.

Infrastructure (Aug 17, 2022)
Abraham Sheppard, Senior Urban Designer, and Darren Choy, Manager of Engineering Services, both with RRM, staffed the Infrastructure Focus Group meeting which convened on August 17, 2022. Attendees included:
• Cyndi Urman, RethinkWaste
• Mike Utz, District Manager, Cal Water
• Kat Weulfing, Assistant GM, Mid-Peninsula Water District • Rene Ramirez, Acting GM, Mid-Peninsula Water District High Level Take Away: It was mentioned SB 1383 the “composting law” requires a third bin for compostable waste. The law went into effect January 2022 and requires the separation of food scraps and yard waste from other garbage. This should be kept in mind as discussions about storage areas for trash and recycling receptacles continues.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1697
7 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Senior-Children-Special Needs (Aug 24, 2022)
Jami Williams, Principal, and Abraham Sheppard, Senior Urban Designer, both with RRM staffed the Seniors-Children-Special Needs Focus Group meeting which convened on August 24, 2022. Attendees included:
• Caitlyn Matoso, Supervisor, Adult Community Center
• Susan Rose, Arbor Bay School
• Terra Fuller, Executive Director, Art BIAS
Take Aways: It was stated that the alleys are difficult for seniors due to uneven pavement and the copious trash. Connectivity between the downtown and the Industrial Arts Area (IAA)/Industrial Arts Business District (IABD). It was also mentioned in the past there was a type of shuttle service taking people downtown. This was useful for seniors and youth, demographics that cannot drive. The idea of murals unifying the downtown was raised as well.

Downtown Business and Events (Aug 30, 2022)
Abraham Sheppard, Senior Urban Designer, RRM staffed the Downtown Business and Events Focus Group meeting which convened on August 30, 2022. Attendees included:
• Wendy Schettino, City Parks Deptartment
• Tyler Muela, City Parks Deptartment
• Lauren Schneider, City Parks Deptartment
• Amy Buckmaster, Farmers Market, Chamber of Commerce
Take Aways: The key takeaway regarding events is acknowledgement of the footprint of each event. The Farmers Market’s official footprint extends along Laurel Street and along Cherry Street up to the alleys.

The Art and Wine Fare’s footprint is from Arroyo Avenue to San Carlos Avenue and from El Camino Real to Elm Street. The high-level takeaway regarding parking is the public parking along El Camino Real south of Belmont Avenue is underutilized and the parking at Wheeler Plaza seems to be underutilized. Wayfinding for parking from Holly Street and El Camino Real would be useful. The takeaway for event banners is:
people like them, event planners request them, however, the funding is constrained since it’s through the Central Business Improvement District (CBID).

Refer to Appendix B for meeting notes from the focus group meetings.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1698
8 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
C. Community Workshops and Open House
Community Workshop # 1 (Aug 31, 2022)
The first Community Workshop was held virtually on August 31, 2022.

There were approximately 160 members of the public in attendance. The workshop agenda covered the Specific Plan Overview, an Interactive Poll, as well as pointers on how to get involved and had optional breakout rooms that attendees could join to ask questions.

In response to the Slido question, “Which of the following improvements would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos”, 82% of workshop respondents indicated, “Beautification, street trees, and landscaping” with 76% of workshop respondents stating “Additional outdoor gathering/seating areas (plazas, pocket parks, paseos, etc.)”, and 70% would like to see “enhanced outdoor dining areas.”
In response to the Slido question, “How do you typically get around Downtown San Carlos? (check all that apply)”, 94% of workshop respondents indicated Walk/Assistive devices, 72% of workshop respondents indicated drive and 21% indicated Bike/e-bike.

In response to, “Which of the following mobility improvements would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check all that apply)”, 76% of workshop respondents indicated enhancements to alleyways, 70% of workshop respondents indicated improved sidewalks, 66% indicated Enhanced pedestrian crossings, 46% indicated additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks and 42% indicated better access to Caltrain Station.

In response to, “If you parked once and walked around, how far are you willing to walk to your destination? (select your preferred distance)”, 41% of workshop indicated a 10-minute walk and 32% indicated a 5-minute walk.

The responses to the Slido poll questions from the first Community Workshop and DTAC meeting #1 are shared in Table 2 on next page.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1699
9 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Community Workshop # 2 (Feb 15, 2023)
The second workshop was held virtually on February 15, 2023. There were approximately 85 members of the public who joined the meeting.

The agenda included a project refresher, the draft Urban Design & Placemaking concepts and the next steps for the project.

Feedback was gathered from the attendees using the Slido platform.

Questions similar to those asked in the January DTAC meeting were asked. The first question asked was, “The City has been hearing many comments and support for closing the 700 block permanently. Do you agree yes or no?” 77% of respondents indicated they agree (yes), with approximately 23% of respondents indicating they disagree (no).

Attendees were also asked, “What is your highest priority for public spaces in the downtown area? (select one)”. About 62% of respondents indicated their highest priority is, “I want to enjoy a public space and the sense of community.”
Table 2: Poll results from Community Workshop meeting # 1 and DTAC meeting # 1

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1700
10 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop attendees were also asked to rank amenities in the downtown core order of importance to them. Taking all responses into account, the ranking of amenities was as follows:

1. Tree canopy

2. Open air with shade covering

3. Lawn or Landscaping

4. Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)

5. Stage/music venue

6. Bistro lighting

7. Public Art

8. Fountain/ Water Feature

9. Area where children can play
Table 3 below shows the ranking of amenities by the DTAC (# 2) and workshop (#2) attendees.

Table 3: Downtown Core Public Space Amenities ranked by attendees at Community Workshop meeting # 2 and DTAC meeting # 2
Toward the end of the workshop, attendees were asked “which is your preferred 700 block option”. Out of the four answer choices given, 64% of respondents selected Plaza Option, 22% selected widened sidewalk, 9% selected flexible closure and 5% selected pre-2020 option.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1701
11 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Coffee and Comments Open House (Mar 4, 2023)
As a follow up to virtual community workshop held on February 15, the City hosted an in-person Coffee and Comments Open House for the Downtown Specific Plan on March 4 between 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. at the City Library at 610 Elm Street.

The open house presented an additional opportunity to collect feedback from the community on three preliminary concepts related to placemaking and urban design. These concepts included improvements to alleyways, the 700 Block of Laurel Street, Harrington Park, and a new plaza off the 600 Block of Laurel Street. There were two presentations by Lisa Porras, Planning Manager for the Advance Planning Division - one at 10:15 a.m. and the second one at 11:15 a.m.

Over 70 community members joined City staff for coffee and pastries and had an opportunity to ask staff questions, view the exhibits, share ideas, and give their feedback.

Refer to Appendix C for the meeting notes from the community workshops and the open house.

Photos from the Coffee and Comments Open House on March 4, 2023

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1702
12 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Key take-aways from the open house are summarized below.

Comments on panels:
• Community members want City to think big and bold in terms of vision for downtown. • There is resounding support for extending closure of Laurel Street to all blocks, not just 700 Block. A few members felt full closure would be overdone.
• Community desires a street that is walkable and supports pedestrian activities like places to sit and have coffee. Community wants more seating and gathering places with the space to feel more welcoming and inviting with greening and public art.
• On building heights, some members suggested keeping heights low along Laurel to maintain a small town feel, while others supported tall buildings that would create more shaded streets. • Community wants public art as part of spaces incuding artistic displays. This could include inviting local artists to offer displays and revitalizing alleys through surprising/delightful art. Tieing the space thematically to other planned areas or destinations like wine/brewary/art districts was also suggested. • Community desires to see a diverse mix of businesses including local businesses and more new kinds of shops, cafes and restaurants.
• Community recommended to make the downtown more green through trees, plants, hanging baskets, and more green space.
• Community wants streets that are friendly for bikes including e-bikes with dedicated bike lanes, infrastructure and routes that go through downtown.
• In terms of amenities, community members suggested adding public restrooms and lighting. • Community members needed more clarity on alleyway design and purpose in terms of pedestrian, parking or servicing use. Some members suggested keeping them for parking and servicing.

Dot voting excercise:
• The top 2 priorities for public spaces in downtown area is wanting to enjoy public space and sense of community and being able to eat lunch outside.
• The top 3 desired amenities included open air with some shade covering, tree canopy and bistro lighting. • The top 3 reasons to visit downtown currently include eating and drinking locally; visiting or taking a walk along Laurel Street; and, Farmer’s Market or special events. • The top 3 things community would like to see downtown include outdoor dining, street trees and wayfinding signs.
• The top 2 types of programs community would like to see downtown include music events and cultural/art exhibits.
• The preferred option for 700 block option included plaza option (full closure). • The top 2 reasons community would visit downtown is if there was a permanent plaza/public gathering spaces and Farmer’s Market or other cool/fun events.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1703
13 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
D. Community Surveys
Social Pointpoint (Interactive Mapping)
(Aug 8, 2022 - Jan 15, 2023)
A Social Pinpoint interactive mapping survey was developed and provided to the public. The questionnaire was open from August 8, 2022 to January 15, 2023. There were approximately 470 comments across five subject areas: mobility, streetscape, gathering spaces, allowable uses, and other comments.

The Mobility topic garnered the most comments, with a total of 163 comments. The Streetscape topic had 83 comments. The Gathering Spaces topic had 75 comments. The Allowable Uses topic had 64 comments and the “Other Comments” category received 85 comments.

Social Pinpoint allows users to agree with (up vote) or disagree with (down vote) the comments of other questionnaire users. The most popular comments by topic area are shown below in Table 4, followed by the top 5 most popular comments of all the comments received on the platform shown in Table 5.

Table 4: Most Popular Comment by Category

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1704
14 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Online Survey - Preliminary Design Concepts ( Mar 1 – Apr 30, 2023) The City is conducting an online survey that gives community members who may have missed the Febuary 15 Community Workshop and March 4 Coffee and Comments Open House another opportunity to share their feedback.

Refer to Appendix D for the raw data from the surveys.

Table 5: Most Popular Comments
Table 4: Most Popular Comment by Category
Spotlight Newsletter (Aug, 2022)
City shared about the project in the Spotlight Newsletter in August, 2022.

Refer to Appendix E for the newsletter.

E. Spotlight Newsletter

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1705
15 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Appendix A
Downtown Advisory Committee Meetings (DTAC) meeting
summaries:
• DTAC Orientation Meeting
• DTAC Special Meeting
• DTAC Meeting # 1
• DTAC Meeting # 2

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1706
1 CITY OF SAN CARLOS

DOWNTOWN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
June 22, 2022 5:30 P.M.

CONDUCTED REMOTELY
www.cityofsancarlos.org

MEETING SUMMARY
In accordance with Assembly Bill 361, this meeting was held remotely.

Committee Members Advisory
James Bertram, Alternate
Madison Blanton, Special Needs
Allie Board, Downtown Business Operator
Amy Buckmaster, Chamber San Mateo
County
Sree Chandrasekharan, At Large
Allison Chang, Downtown Property Owner
Tom Davids, Downtown Property Owner
Jean Dehner, Adult Community Center
Elisa Espinoza, At Large
Samina Ginwalla, YAC
Anthony Kamm, EDAC
Cecile Lee, Alternate
Donna Lera, Downtown Business Operator
Tracy Massaro, Alternate
Mark Maxwell, PRC
Monette Meredith, At Large
Elizabeth Min, Alternate
Maya Nayberg, YAC
Joaquin Pedrin, At Large
Al Savay, Community Economic &
Development Director
Lisa Porras, Advance Planning Manager

1. MEETING KICK-OFF

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1707
2 3. ATTENDANCE
NAME Present Absent NAME Present Absent
James Bertram
(Alternate)
X Anthony Kamm
(EDAC)
X
Madison Blanton
(Special Needs)
X Cecile Lee
(Alternate)
X
Allie Board
(Downtown Bus.

Operator)
X Donna Lera
(Downtown Business
Operator)
X
Amy Buckmaster
(Chamber San Mateo
County)
X Tracy Massaro
(Alternate)
X
Sree
Chandrasekharan
(At Large)
X Mark Maxwell
(Parks & Recreation
Committee)
X
Allison Chang
(Downtown Property
Owner)
X Monette Meredith
(At Large)
X
Tom Davids
(Downtown Property
Owner)
X Elizabeth Min
(Alternate)
X
Jean Dehner
(Adult Community
Center)
X Maya Nayberg
(Youth Advisory Committee)
X
Elisa Espinoza
(At Large)
X Joaquin Pedrin
(At Large)
X
Samina Ginwalla
(Youth Advisory
Committee)
X

4. MEETING OBJECTIVES

5. DISCUSSION ITEMS
a. Welcome and Introductions, Including City Staff Contact Information City staff welcomed the DTAC members and gave a short introduction to the project; the DTAC members introduced themselves.
b. DTAC Orientation on the Brown Act and Public Records Requests The City Attorney, Greg Rubens, gave an overview of the Brown Act and Public Records Requests. Key takeaways include:
• Do no talk to fellow members about an item on the agenda. It could create a serial medium.
• Do not “Reply All” in emails. Only reply to City staff. This is to prevent accidental discussion.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1708
3 • Pay attention to all social media discussion. All those can potentially create a discussion medium.
• This is an Advisory Body. It is not considered public officials. Need to be aware of conflict of interest.
• Always use City Email (Once it is available)
• City Staff will always send reminders whenever any document is sent for review and comments (including Hard Copies)
• City Attorney, Greg Rubens, Contact information: (408) 606 6315, [email protected]
Question - Tom Davids, Downtown Property Owner:

What extent are we allowed to talk about a subject?

Answer - Greg Rubens, City Attorney: Technically less than a majority can talk about a subject, i.e., less than 10; For DTAC, 10 is a quorum that can decide on an item.

Question - Donna Lera, Downtown Business Operator:

Will there be meeting minutes available?
Answer - Greg Rubens, City Attorney: Meeting summary will go out in the subsequent DTAC Meeting for review. It will go out with the material sent to DTAC members prior to the meeting.

Question - Donna Lera, Downtown Business Operator:

Is it better to not get on any social media to avoid serial medium? Answer - Greg Rubens, City Attorney: If the social media is discussing a related subject matter, then DTAC members are advised to not take part in it.

Question - Mark Maxwell, Parks & Recreation Committee:

Are these meeting recorded and available to the public? Will there be public comments?
Answer - Lisa Porras, Advance Planning Manager:

Recording is available to the public. DTAC meetings will be uploaded on the project website. Meeting is not broadcast live.

Public comment is allowed at the end of the agenda.
c. DTAC Roles and Responsibilities, City Email, Communications, Meeting Schedule and Format, Project Website and Resource Library Lisa Porras announced that:
• City emails will be available in about two weeks. All correspondence needs to come through this email.
• Meetings will be in the evenings.
• www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com is available to the public. DTAC meeting summaries and recording will reside there.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1709
4 • There will be public workshops to allow the broader community opportunity to be part of the process.
• Materials will be available online as well as a hard copies available for the DTAC • There are 5 DTAC Meetings. There may be more depending on the needs of the project.
d. The Downtown Specific Plan – Project Goals and Timeline, and Introduction to Specific Plans
Lisa Porras and Jami Williams gave presentations on the project goals, themes, and introduction to specific plan requirements.

Question - Mark Maxwell, Parks & Recreation Committee:

Why was the boundary cut off at Greenwood Ave and not further? Answer - Lisa Porras, Advance Planning Manager:

The original intent was to look at downtown all the way south to Eaton. This would be a lot to accomplish in two years; from a realistic perspective staff recommended to the Council to conduct this in two phases. The Council directed staff to set the southern boundary as part of the first phase to Greenwood.

Answer - Al Savay, Community & Economic Development Director:

Al Savay added that Brittan to Greenwood businesses are consistent with the look and feel of the other blocks, therefore City Council decided to extend one more block.

Question - Tom Davids, Downtown Property Owner:

Will we continue to attend meetings in Zoom?
Answer – Lisa Porras, Advance Planning Manager
All DTAC meetings are anticipated to occur via Zoom. As the project unfolds, it may be necessary to hold some DTAC meetings. All DATC meetings welcome the public to attend. City staff will solicit participation by a broader audience at upcoming community wide workshops.

Question – Monette Meredith, At Large
El Camino Real is a state highway, are we bound by just the businesses, or we are incorporating the roads and parking on that street? Answer – Lisa Porras, Advance Planning manager
The full right of way will be included in the Downtown Specific Plan area. The city staff has already reached out to key staff at Caltrans for collaboration as part of the development of the Downtown Specific Plan.

Question – Monette Meredith, At Large
The little parking area in Wheeler Plaza was meant to be a plaza. But it has not come to fruition. Was that just an idea and was never part of the Wheeler Plaza Project?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1710
5 Answer – Lisa Porras, Advance Planning Manager
That area was not part of the formal Wheeler Plaza development project. The small area off Laurel Street that is now a small parking area was studied to serve as a public plaza. The City has done some initial evaluation and creative thinking about that area. Now that we are embarking the Downtown Specific Plan, we will include that as part of the plan and determine what the public would like to see there.
e. Civic Engagement – Community Workshops, Online Surveys, Focus Group and Stakeholder Meetings
Staff announced the different strategies that will be used to engage the public and obtain feedback from the community using a variety of different methods. f. DTAC Meet and Greet Social Event – Lisa Porras announced that the City will schedule an opportunity for the DTAC to meet and greet each other in person; staff is considering an ice cream social. Details forthcoming.

6. PUBLIC COMMENT - None

7. WRAP UP AND NEXT STEPS – Meeting adjourned at 8:00pm Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Downtown Advisory Committee Members regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection upon request.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VI, if you need special assistance or translation services to participate in this meeting, please contact the Advance Planning Division at (650) 802-4256 or via email at [email protected] Notification in advance of the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1711
1 CITY OF SAN CARLOS

DOWNTOWN ADVISORY COMMITTEE

SPECIAL MEETING
July 13, 2022 5:30 P.M.

Council Chambers, City Hall 600 Elm Street,
San Carlos, CA 94070
www.cityofsancarlos.org

MEETING SUMMARY
Committee Members Advisory
Anthony Kamm, EDAC
Mark Maxwell, PRC
Al Savay, Community & Economic
Development Director
Samina Ginwalla, YAC Lisa Porras, Advance Planning Manager Maya Nayberg, YAC
Amy Buckmaster, Chamber San Mateo
County
Jean Dehner, ACC
Allison Chang, Downtown Property Owner
Tom Davids, Downtown Property Owner
Allie Board, Downtown Business Operator
Donna Lera, Downtown Business Operator
Madison Blanton, Special Needs
Joaquin Pedrin, At Large
Sreecharan Chandrasekharan, At Large
Monette Meredith, At Large
Elisa Espinoza, At Large
James Bertram, Alternate
Cecile Lee, Alternate
Elizabeth Min, Alternate
Tracy Massaro, Alternate

1. MEETING KICK-OFF
a. Meeting started at 5:36pm

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1712
2 3. ATTENDANCE
NAME Present Absent NAME Present Absent
James Betram
(Alternate)
X Anthony Kamm
(EDAC)
X
Madison Blanton
(Special Needs)
X Cecile Lee
(Alternate)
X
Allie Board
(Downtown Bus. Operator)
X Donna Lera
(Downtown Business
Operator)
X
Amy Buckmaster
(Chamber San Mateo
County)
X Tracy Massaro
(Alternate)
X
Sree
Chandrasekharan
(At Large)
X Maya Nayberg
(Youth Advisory
Committee)
X
Allison Chang
(Downtown Property
Owner)
X Mark Maxwell
(Parks & Recreations
Committee)
X
Tom Davids
(Downtown Property
Owner)
X Monette Meredith
(At Large)
X
Jean Dehner
(Adult Community Center)
X Elizabeth Min
(Alternate)
X
Elisa Espinoza
(At Large)
X Joaquin Pedrin
(At Large)
X
Samina Ginwalla
(Youth Advisory
Committee)
X

4. PRESENTATION
a) Al Savay gave a presentation on “Reimagining Main Street, What Makes Downtown Special?”

5. PUBLIC COMMENT - None

6. ANNOUCEMENTS & REMINDERS
Lisa Porras announced and reminded DTAC members:
• To pick up DTAC Binder available outside at the City Hall Courtyard • To read the memo provided inside their personal binders for instructions about how to pick up future DTAC meeting materials at the City Hall library • To set up their City of San Carlos email, which is the official email for all DTAC correspondence, and that the Ice Cream social will end around 6:20ish, members are welcome to leave early.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1713
3 7. ICE CREAM SOCIAL (outdoors at the City Hall Courtyard) DTAC members mingled and participated in an ice breaker to share two things they appreciated about the downtown and two things that they would like to see happen in the downtown.

Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Downtown Advisory Committee Members regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection upon request.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1714
1 CITY OF SAN CARLOS

DOWNTOWN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
September 13, 2022 6:00 P.M.

CONDUCTED REMOTELY
www.cityofsancarlos.org

MEETING SUMMARY

COMMITTEE MEMBERS STAFF
Anthony Kamm, EDAC
Mark Maxwell, PRC (absent)
Samina Ginwalla, YAC
Maya Nayberg, YAC
Amy Buckmaster, Chamber San Mateo County
Jean Dehner, ACC
Allison Chang, Downtown Property Owner
Tom Davids, Downtown Property Owner (absent)
Allie Board, Downtown Business Operator
Donna Lera, Downtown Business Operator
Madison Blanton, Special Needs
Joaquin Pedrin, At Large
Sreecharan Chandrasekharan, At Large
Monette Meredith, At Large
Elisa Espinoza, At Large
James Bertram, Alternate
Cecile Lee, Alternate
Elizabeth Min, Alternate
Tracy Massaro, Alternate

PUBLIC MEMBER
Al Savay, Community and Economic Development
Director
Lisa Porras, Planning Manager
Sajuti Hoque, Senior Management Analyst

CONSULTANTS
Jami William, Principal, RRM Design Group
Abe Sheppard, Sr. Urban Designer, RRM Design
Group
Rachel Raynor, Senior Planner, RRM Design Group
Brian Canepa, Principal, W-Trans
Joe McClure, Senior Associate, TNDG
Sonia Elkes

1. MEETING KICKOFF
The meeting kicked off at 6:03pm.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1715
2 3. ATTENDANCE
NAME Present Absent NAME Present Absent
James Betram
(Alternate)
X Anthony Kamm
(EDAC)
X
Madison Blanton
(Special Needs)
X Cecile Lee
(Alternate)
X
Allie Board
(Downtown Bus. Operator)
X Donna Lera
(Downtown Business
Operator)
X
Amy Buckmaster
(Chamber San Mateo
County)
X Tracy Massaro
(Alternate)
X
Sree
Chandrasekharan
(At Large)
X Maya Nayberg
(Youth Advisory
Committee)
X
Allison Chang
(Downtown Property
Owner)
X Mark Maxwell
(Parks & Recreations
Committee)
X
Tom Davids
(Downtown Property
Owner)
X Monette Meredith
(At Large)
X
Jean Dehner
(Adult Community Center)
X Elizabeth Min
(Alternate)
X
Elisa Espinoza
(At Large)
X Joaquin Pedrin
(At Large)
X
Samina Ginwalla
(Youth Advisory
Committee)
X

4. PRESENTATION AND DISCUSSION
a. Mobility Analysis
• Joaquin: Are we looking at parking on the east side of El Camino Real part of the SAMTRANS lot? Are you reaching out to Caltrans as part of this discussion? o Brian: it is on our radar and Caltrans is part of our mobility group o Al: we have an agreement for 100 spaces on the southern end of the SAMTRANS lot after 6pm weekdays and all weekend. Also, an agreement for parking on top of the SAMTRANS parking garage 50 plus spaces.
• Jim Bertan: what about the parking underneath the library? o Lisa: Not part of the study area
• Cecile Lee and Sree Charan: Is there dedicated spaces for:

1. Delivery [Doordash/UberEats]; Short term parking.

2. Uber [Future self-driving pick up dedicated] stops?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1716
3 o Brian: observed that there are very little loading spaces in the downtown area. We are understanding where that is best suited and how to enforce / regulate that. We are also looking at policy (i.e., code requirements for the downtown area) in terms of parking. • Maya Nayberg: the crossing lights at the Caltrain take a long time, is that something we could address as part of this effort?
o Brian: certainly
• Monette Meredith: alleyway along Laurel if block of Laurel is closed; free for all – lots of users trying to access the alleys.
o Brian: trying to approach it from a variety of ways and analyze the competing needs for the alleys. Alleyways have also been communicated as being messy. • Allison Chang: intentional parking for micro mobility ~ think about a parking lot that could be staff or supervised to provide additional security. A plan to contain vehicles in an intentional, convenient and attractive way would be ideal. Redwood City is an example of scooters everywhere.
• Allie Rae Board: doesn’t the Caltrain have lockers that are available for purchase / rental? o Brian: some Caltrain stations do, but we would have to confirm for the San Carlos station
• Cecile Lee: How about security cameras in the parking areas? Hopefully, there's a plan to include them.
b. Market Analysis and Existing Land Use Policies & Zoning • Anthony: to Market Analysis, the 600 units are based on standard development based on population projections. Was there any thought to include the CVS in the downtown specific plan area?
o Joe: yes, those units are based on population projections, and are different than the RHNA numbers.
o Lisa: the CVS off San Carlos is designated as part of the City’s Housing Element • Anthony: If additional developments are going to occur along El Camino Real, can we have developers provide parking for the downtown area.
o Al: That is an interesting idea
• Anthony: has there been any thought to making the downtown similar to Redwood City Precise Plan? That provides 3-5 design criteria for streamlining entitlement process. Once implemented how long would the project take once the specific plan is implemented? o Jami: a specific plan is a tool to allow streamlining of projects and a program EIR will be prepared as part of the project. A specific plan writes specific development standards for the study area.
o Al: hard to say and depends on each case, also takes time to prepare drawings and secure a building permit
• Allison Chang: For the sake of comparison: The 1001 Laurel St housing development (Laurel and Morse) has something like 90 units, in four stories, with a big courtyard and some retail on the 1st floor. Would these new 100 or 120 units/acre developments be about that size? Just trying to picture it.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1717
4 o Lisa: that project was a planned development plan, which allows for some flexibility and deviation from the zoning standards. Mentioned study session on Monday with the planning commission.
• Amy Buckmaster: what will El Camino look like with housing? Will we be considering higher stories for the downtown?
o Lisa: Mixed use typically has retail / office on ground floor, and sometimes below grade parking, but that is typically more expensive.
• Cecile Lee: office demand data – how are we taking this into account if the demand for office space continues to decline.
• Donna Lera: San Carlos has had such a deficit of office space though that it's really needed some of this.
• Samina Ginwalla and Maya Nayberg: How will this extra housing impact schools in the San Carlos/sequoia union high school district? Many schools are already super overcrowded, and this has led to the construction of more schools (ex. Mariposa and Arroyo). As a high school student, the number of students in classes/grades is already becoming overwhelming. Funding for campus expansions.
o Lisa: school districts have standards and their own authority to plan for their needs. The school district does reach out to city staff regularly to touch base on long range plans and the school district then incorporates these into their own independent long-range plans. Impact fees are tied to development.
• Allie Rae Board: Gathering spaces is so broad. Can we elaborate on that after we wrap? o Jami: we left that intentionally vague so we can craft the gathering places together as we proceed through the process

4. PUBLIC COMMENT
• Sonia Elkes: Walnut next to Laurel could be an extension; entertaining the possibility of one-way streets in the downtown, or diagonal parking in the downtown. Have Walnut Street leading into the downtown like a super highway for micro-mobility.

5. WRAP UP AND NEXT STEPS – Meeting adjourned at 7:57pm Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Downtown Advisory Committee Members regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection upon request.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1718
Downtown San Carlos DTAC
#3 Online Survey
08 - 15 Sep 2022
Poll results

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1719
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – What is the city motto for San
Carlos?
0 1 5
Preserving the Past to Enhance the Future
0 %
Land of Gracious Living
7 %
City of Good Living
87 %
What happens in San Carlos, stays in San Carlos
7 %
America’s Finest City
0 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1720
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Please check all that apply: 0 1 5
I live in Downtown San Carlos
40 %
I live within walking distance of Downtown San Carlos
47 %
I work in Downtown San Carlos
33 %
I shop, eat, and/or utilize a service in Downtown San Carlos 93 %
I own a business and/or commercial property in Downtown San Carlos
20 %
I am just curious about the project
7 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1721
Wordcloud poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
0 1 5
potential
Community
lacking family
Under-visited during day
Tiny
Outdated
Multifaceted
Multi use
Friendly
Family friendly

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1722
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements would
you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check
all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 4
Beautification, street trees, and landscaping
100 %
Enhanced aesthetics of the commercial character/building design 86 %
Highlighted culture and history of the Downtown with plaques or signage
57 %
Additional outdoor gathering/seating areas (plazas, pocket parks, paseos, etc.)
93 %
Enhanced outdoor dining areas
79 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1723
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements would
you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check
all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 4
Additional gateway and wayfinding signage
43 %
Public art
57 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1724
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Why do you currently go to Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 5
Eat
93 %
Shop
73 %
Work
27 %
Services (auto repair, tailor, nail salon, etc.)
40 %
Farmers Market
67 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1725
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Why do you currently go to Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 5
Take the train
20 %
I live in Downtown
27 %
Visit Laurel Street
73 %
None of the above
0 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1726
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following uses would you like to
see more of within Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 5
Shops
60 %
Restaurants
53 %
Culture and entertainment
80 %
Personal services (beauty supply, nail salon, tailor, etc.) 33 %
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 47 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1727
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following uses would you like to
see more of within Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 5
Gathering spaces
93 %
Housing options
33 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1728
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – The namesake for Drake’s
located at the corner of San Carlos Avenue and
El Camino Real is:
0 1 4
Canadian rapper Drake
7 %
The urban dictionary definition for a lower class of dragon or a higher class of serpent
0 %
Sir Francis Drake the daring English explorer in the 16th century 7 %
Mr. Frederick Drake known as the father of “San Carlos” 86 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1729
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street 600-800 blocks (from San
Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of the
following uses would you like to see? (check all
that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 5
Retail
87 %
Restaurant
73 %
Professional Offices
13 %
Medical services/ medical offices
13 %
Boutique hotels
40 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1730
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street 600-800 blocks (from San
Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of the
following uses would you like to see? (check all
that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 5
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 53 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1731
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street outside 600-800 blocks (from
San Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of
the following uses would you like to see? (check
all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 5
Retail
53 %
Restaurant
60 %
Professional Offices
40 %
Medical services/ medical offices
47 %
Boutique hotels
60 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1732
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street outside 600-800 blocks (from
San Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of
the following uses would you like to see? (check
all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 5
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 67 %
Standalone housing (apartments, condominiums, or multi-family homes)
40 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1733
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along El Camino Real which of the following
uses would you like to see? (check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 5
Retail
67 %
Restaurant
40 %
Professional Offices
60 %
Medical services/ medical offices
53 %
Auto-related uses
27 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1734
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along El Camino Real which of the following
uses would you like to see? (check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 5
Hotels
67 %
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 60 %
Standalone housing (apartments, condominiums, or multi-family homes)
27 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1735
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – The citizens of San Carlos
voted to incorporate as a city in:
0 1 5
June 1925
67 %
November 1922
7 %
January 1940
13 %
June 1933
13 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1736
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you typically get around Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 5
Walk/assistive devices
87 %
Bike/e-bike
13 %
Skate/Scooter
7 %
Drive
67 %
Rideshare - Uber/Lyft
7 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1737
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you typically get around Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 5
Public Transit
0 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1738
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 1 5
Improved sidewalks
87 %
Enhanced pedestrian crossings
67 %
Additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks
53 %
Shared e-bikes
27 %
Shared e-scooters
33 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1739
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 1 5
Enhancements to alleyways
100 %
Improvements to public transit service or amenities (such as bus stops or shelters)
53 %
Better access to the Caltrain Station
47 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1740
Multiple-choice poll
If you parked once and walked around, how far
are you willing to walk to your destination?
(select your preferred distance)
0 1 5
half a block
0 %
about one block
0 %
about two blocks
27 %
5-minute walk
27 %
10-minute walk
47 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1741
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Where do you prefer to park when you visit
Downtown? (select the most often used)
0 1 5
Street parking
47 %
Public parking in lots or alleyways behind businesses
27 %
Public parking structure
47 %
Private parking associated with the business I am visiting 0 %
I do not park in Downtown
13 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1742
Wordcloud poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
0 1 5
burlingame
Redwood City
San MateoVibrant
Redwood City/Mountain vie Palo Alto
Menlo Park
Hillsdale
Burlingame (before pande)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1743
1 CITY OF SAN CARLOS

DOWNTOWN ADVISORY COMMITTEE
January 25, 2023, 6:30 PM

CONDUCTED REMOTELY
www.cityofsancarlos.org

MEETING SUMMARY

COMMITTEE MEMBERS STAFF
Anthony Kamm, EDAC (absent)
Mark Maxwell, PRC (absent)
Samina Ginwalla, YAC
Maya Nayberg, YAC
Amy Buckmaster, Chamber San Mateo County
Jean Dehner, ACC
Allison Chang, Downtown Property Owner
Tom Davids, Downtown Property Owner
Allie Board, Downtown Business Operator
Donna Lera, Downtown Business Operator
Madison Blanton, Special Needs
Joaquin Pedrin, At Large
Sreecharan Chandrasekharan, At Large (absent)
Monette Meredith, At Large
Elisa Espinoza, At Large
James Bertram, Alternate
Cecile Lee, Alternate
Elizabeth Min, Alternate
Tracy Massaro, Alternate
Al Savay, Community and Economic Development
Director
Lisa Porras, Planning Manager
Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, Senior Planner
Sajuti Hoque, Senior Management Analyst

CONSULTANTS
Jami William, Principal, RRM Design Group
Katja Dillmann, Senior Planner, RRM Design Group

1. MEETING KICKOFF
The meeting kicked off at 6:31pm.

2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

3. PRESENTATION & DISCUSSION
a. Lisa Porras, Planning Manager, gave the introduction, including the Plan overview and update.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1744
2 Draft Concepts for 700 Block of Laurel Street
b. Jami Williams, Principal, RRM Design Group, presented the Urban Design and Placemaking Concepts and options for the 700 block of Laurel Street.

Katja Dillmann, Senior Planner, RRM Design Group, conducted a polling exercise using Slido.com.

Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC) Discussion on Laurel Street 700 Block Jami Williams clarified that in the Flexible Closure Option, parklets could remain, beautified, and standards could be put in place for their visual appearance.

Jami Williams clarified that in the Widen Sidewalk Option, bicyclists and motorists will share the travel lane.

Joaquin Pedrin (At Large) asked about the implementation time.

Jami Williams explained that the Specific Plan would provide direction on how the streets should be configured in the future and then functionality would be programmed later.

Joaquin Pedrin wanted to know if the parking for all of Laurel Street would be proposed to parallel or just on the 700 block?
Jami Williams shared that this depends on which option is chosen.

Joaquin Pedrin shared that the Plaza Option is great, but it must depend on the alley solutions, especially for business owners.

Maya Nayberg (Youth Advisory Committee) shared that the teens would go to downtown if there is a plaza to hang out, and it would be a safer environment.

Amy Buckmaster (Chamber San Mateo County) shared that she loved the Plaza idea, and it could capture community events. She shared her concern for businesses and emergency response teams and wondered how businesses would get their goods and services. Amy Buckmaster also wanted to know if the bollards would be in place.

Jamie Williams stated most likely bollards would be in place.

Samina Ginwalla (Youth Advisory Committee) wants a more accessible downtown. She echoed Amy Buckmaster’s concern. She added that there would be so much more to experience when one is on foot.

Donna Lera (Downtown Business Operator) referred to the Green Furniture photo in the presentation. She shared that it would be nice to have that. She wanted to know with a wider sidewalk, how would space be shared between pedestrians and restaurant outdoor dining. Donna Lera stated that it would be difficult to support retail when cars could not access the stores, and referenced UPS moving to San Carlos Avenue.

Jami Williams clarified that both the Widen Sidewalk and Full Plaza Options would have room for outdoor dining.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1745
3 Jim Bertram (Alternate) shared that he is leaning towards the Plaza Option. He agreed with the representatives from the Youth Advisory Council. He shared that a plaza would separate San Carlos from other cities and is flexible for future needs.

Cecile Lee (Alternate) shared that the Plaza Option would allow more opportunity for intergenerational activities such as theatre in the summer, movies, etc.

Elizabeth Min (Alternate) wanted to know the funding model and asked if the City could afford a plaza.

Al Savay, Community and Economic Development Director stated that everyone should focus on the desired outcome first, then figure out the funding. He shared that the City would get creative about the funding, and everyone should dream big.

Allie Board (Downtown Business Operator) shared that if the City goes with the Plaza Option she would not be in business. She shared that in the last few months, her business was terrible. Her customers could not find parking. Allie commented that there is a youth center and library for youth to hangout; they do not need a plaza to hang out.

Allie Board shared that during the City’s public events such as Globin Walk and Winter Lights, she hardly got any business on those days, and business was the worst during Art and Wine Faire.

Lisa Porras shared that the DTAC would discuss Land Use in the Specific Plan. She stated that the City just adopted the Housing Element, which is supporting increased development along El Camino Real and throughout the downtown, specifically for residential uses. As the Downtown grows, more people would be living around Downtown. Lisa Porras added that soon they would discuss how housing could change the Downtown in a positive way.

Allison Chang (Downtown Business Operator) shared that a Plaza would allow greater access for people using wheelchairs.

Donna Lera shared that she heard challenges from retailers similar to what Allie Board shared. She stated that a few businesses have already left Laurel Street and UPS Store was a great example.

Maya Nayberg commented that younger youth use the Youth Center, but older teens like high schoolers do not necessarily have a place to go, which is why the plaza will be beneficial for this older age group.

Elisa Espinoza (At Large) thanked Allie Board for her great point. She agreed with Lisa Porras that that having more housing near Downtown would help increase foot traffic.

Eliza Espinoza shared that she lives a block away from Downtown and find herself going to the Downtown shops frequently because it is so close, and she does not need to drive.

Draft Concepts for Public Spaces
Jami Williams presented the Draft Concepts for Public Spaces.

Katja Dillmann conducted the Polling Exercise on Public Spaces.

Katja Dillmann clarified that Eat Lunch Outside in the polling option meant take away lunch. She also clarified that People Watch meant a place to enjoy the community without having to purchase anything.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1746
4 Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC) Discussion on Public Spaces Jami Williams clarified that the discussion covers all public spaces not just the 700 block of Laurel Street.

Tracy Massaro (Alternate) wanted to know the decision process for the concept options.

Lisa Porras explained that the City staff are collecting feedback from the DTAC first, then will be holding a community-wide workshop on February 15, 2023. After that, the City will present these options and the community’s feedback to the Planning and Transportation Commission, and then to the City Council. Lisa Porras added that the City Council would provide their input and discuss a preferred recommendation. City staff will return to the DTAC after fine-tuning the concepts. Lisa Porras stated that this is an iterative process.

Monette Meredith wanted to know how to address the equity of the businesses on the 600 and 700 block. She shared that a plaza in one block would bring unequal opportunities.

Jami Williams stated that the Downtown Specific Plan would look at the entire Downtown area.

Amy Buckmaster shared that if there is a plaza, there should not be any pop-ups to take away sales from the permanent businesses.

Elizabeth Min stated that there is a need to look at parking.

Maya Nayberg referred to Cecile Lee’s comment about an outdoor movie theatre. She stated that the Youth Center has a big movie screen. The Youth Center is a more structured place for younger students, and high schoolers do not go there. Maya suggested a coffee shop for studying.

Cecile Lee seconded Maya Nayberg’s suggestion of coffee shop to expand to adults who work from home. She suggested integrating an interactive game area in the plaza such as bocce ball and chess games. Cecile Lee added organizing a Beer Garden Oktoberfest like the one organized by Redwood City would be nice.

Draft Concepts for Alley Improvements
Jami Williams presented the Draft Concepts for Alley Improvements.

Downtown Advisory Committee (DTAC) Discussion on Alley Improvements Joaquin Pedrin wanted to know if more research would be done. He shared that there is a 40-foot alley area behind UPS, which is a big opportunity.

Jami Williams confirmed that more research would be done, and the City needs to look at alleyways in a cohesive way.

Monette Meredith (At Large) stated that it is unclear where businesses are in the alleyways, and delivery trucks are blocking the way.

Donna Lera suggested to have security in the alleys and making them a one-way street.

She added that there needs to be more ADA-accessible parking.

Donna shared that businesses along El Camino Real and businesses along Laurel Street share the alleys that run behind and between the buildings. She shared that space is

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1747
5 limited, and it can be difficult for the businesses to share the space and meet their needs for access, deliveries, etc. Solutions need to be considered to maximize the usage of the alleyway areas.

Samina Ginwalla shared that she saw needles, empty alcohol bottles, and beer cans in downtown. She stated that if the City is going to fix the alleyways, safety should be a top priority.

5. PUBLIC COMMENT – None

6. WRAP UP AND NEXT STEPS
Lisa Porras shared the following:

The upcoming Downtown Specific Plan Community Workshop will be held on February 15, 2023, starting at 7:00pm. She asked the DTAC to reach out to their network and invite their friends, neighbors, and colleagues to the workshop.

All the feedback from the DTAC members on the presentation and the questions from the polls will be fine-tuned before presenting this to the broader community.

The Zoom meeting link for the February 15th Downtown Specific Plan Community Workshop will be sent out to the registered attendees on the week of the event.

The project is still in Second Phase – Concept Plans Alternatives.

DTAC is the first to view the Concept Plans. These will then be taken to the broader community, followed by the Planning and Transportation Commission, and then City Council. The Concept Plans will evolve. A preferred recommendation based on all the input from the community will be shared with the DTAC for their feedback.

7. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 8:10 pm.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1748
JanDTAC
25 - 26 Jan 2023
Poll results

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1749
Table of contents
Which is your preferred 700 block option?
I would go downtown more often (select 2):

I would like to see more of the following in Downtown (select all that apply):

What types of programs or entertainment would you like to see downtown (select all that apply):

How would you like to use public space in the downtown area? What is your highest priority for public spaces in the downtown area? Please rank the most important amenities in order of importance to you in the downtown core (#1 is the MOST important)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1750
Multiple-choice poll
Which is your preferred 700 block option? 0 1 1
Flexible Closure
0 %
Widened Sidewalk
0 %
Plaza Option
91 %
Pre-2020 Option
9 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1751
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
I would go downtown more often (select 2): 0 1 2
There was a permanent plaza
92 %
There were wider sidewalks with adjacent parking
8 %
I could drive, like before 2020
17 %
I could go for Farmer's Market and special events
83 %
Other
8 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1752
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
I would like to see more of the following in
Downtown (select all that apply):
(1/2)
0 1 2
Outdoor dining
67 %
Street furnishings
92 %
Plazas
92 %
Public Art
67 %
Wayfinding
33 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1753
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
I would like to see more of the following in
Downtown (select all that apply):
(2/2)
0 1 2
Street trees
75 %
Bicycle Parking
33 %
Other
0 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1754
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
What types of programs or entertainment
would you like to see downtown (select all that
apply):
(1/2)
0 1 3
Music evets
77 %
Kid friendly programs
46 %
Theater/ Performance pop up events
62 %
Cultural or art exhibits
69 %
Movies on the plaza/square
46 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1755
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
What types of programs or entertainment
would you like to see downtown (select all that
apply):
(2/2)
0 1 3
Activities/ yoga, tai chi, qi gong
54 %
Chess, backgammon, game night
15 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1756
Multiple-choice poll
How would you like to use public space in the
downtown area?
0 1 2
I want to people watch
0 %
I want to go somewhere with my kids
0 %
I want to be able to eat lunch outside
58 %
I would like to attend events and
42 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1757
Multiple-choice poll
What is your highest priority for public spaces in
the downtown area?
0 1 3
I want to people watch
23 %
I want to go somewhere with my kids
8 %
I want to be able to eat lunch outside
31 %
I would like events and programs
38 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1758
Ranking poll
Please rank the most important amenities in
order of importance to you in the downtown
core (#1 is the MOST important)
(1/2)
0 1 3

1. Open air with some shade covering

6.15 2. Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)

5.77 3. Stage/ music venue

5.08 4. Lawn or Landscaping

5.00 5. Tree Canopy

3.69 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1759
Ranking poll
Please rank the most important amenities in
order of importance to you in the downtown
core (#1 is the MOST important)
(2/2)
0 1 3

6. Area where children can play

3.31 7. Bistro lighting

3.08 8. Fountain/Water Feature

2.77 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1760
16 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Appendix B
Focus Group Meetings information and notes:
• Focus group list of attendees
• Focus group meeting - Infrastructure
• Focus group meeting - Mobility
• Focus group meeting - Seniors-Children-Special Needs
• Focus group meeting - Downtown Businesses and Events

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1761
San Carlos DTSP
Stakeholder Interviews & Focus Group Meetings
Focus Group Meetings – List of Attendees
o Infrastructure 8/17/22
 Cyndi Urman, RethinkWaste
 Mike Utz, District Manager, Cal Water
 Kat Weulfing, Assistant GM, Mid-Peninsula Water District  Rene Ramirez, Acting GM, Mid-Peninsula Water District  Consultants
• Darren Choy, RRM
• Abraham Sheppard, RRM
o Mobility 8/22/22
 Heather Wolnick, Community Organizer, Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition  Sonia Elkes, Founder, San Carlos Bikes
 Thomas Feledy, Former Planning Commissioner
 Jessica Epstein, Government and Community Affairs Manager, SamTrans  Gwen Buckley, Senior Planner, SamTrans
 Mark Leong, District Branch Chief, Caltrans
 Laurel Sears, Associate Transportation Planner, Caltrans  Mark Bauhaus, Bike advocate
 Karen, Healthy Cities Tutoring
 Consultants
• Brain Canepa, Principal, W-Trans
• Abraham Sheppard, Senior Urban Designer, RRM
o Seniors-Children-Special Needs 8/24/22
 Caitlyn Matoso, Supervisor, Adult Community Center
 Susan Rose, Arbor Bay School (children in K-8th grade with mild to moderate learning differences)
 Terra Fuller, Executive Director, Art BIAS
 Linda Scannell, Coordinator, Adult Community Center (not in attendance)  Monica Nunez, California Clubhouse (not in attendance)  Consultants
• Abraham Sheppard, RRM
• Jami Williams, RRM
o DT Business and Events (8/30/22)
 Wendy Schettino (City Parks Dept)
 Tyler Muela (City Parks Dept)
 Lauren Schneider (City Parks Dept)
 Amy Buckmaster (Farmers Market, Chamber of Commerce)
• Consultant
o Abraham Sheppard, RRM

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1762
Focus Group Meeting - INFRASTRUCTURE
Aug 17, 2022
Participants
Darren Choy and Abe Sheppard, RRM
Cyndi Urman, RethinkWaste
Mike Utz, District Manager, Cal Water
Kat Weulfing, Assistant GM, Mid-Peninsula Water District Rene Ramirez, Acting GM, Mid-Peninsula Water District
Mike Utz, CalWater:
• Redwood City looking at purple water – 24” line from the airport • No planned projects for main replacements downtown but future capacity/demand could require new mains
• Concrete vs asphalt maintenance
• Ideally, would replace mains before new paving, but understood that this is not always possible dealing with CIP financing
• Development will be responsible for replacing some mains • Recent work in San Carlos on traffic calming includes some infrastructure improvements to set up for future development
• Definitely wants to be kept in the loop about development projections and capacities • Layton Low is an alternate POC
Pie in the Sky:
• Desalination: Genentech has talked about desalination, but hasn’t heard of anything else • ok to mention as potential future, but recycled water is the necessary near- and mid-term focus Rene Ramirez, Mid-Pen:
• Not sure that they have service in the Plan Area. He will get back to us. RRM send email first. • They have worked on advanced water treatment processes to bring in treated water, but they are a small company and are not looking at purple pipe
• Service area will never conflict or combine with Calwater Cyndi Urman, RethinkWaste
• 3 bin systems required by SB 1383 (composting law in effect 2022) • New enforcement mechanisms – future could include “electronic eyes” to monitor adherence to the law against waste
• Underground trash systems worth looking into, but it’s complicated now by SB 1383 requiring all 3 bins (trash, recycle, compost)
• We should reach out to Recology to talk about operations (Evan Boyd or Tenny Belvany – Recology or Rethinkwaste to verify names and contact info) • Recology has contract until 2035

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1763
Standards for new development:
• Valve or vault over the main
• Horizontal and vertical clearance between trash and water utilities • sensor on fire hydrants
• incorporate tracking technology when replacing infrastructure for monitoring flows, capacities, and failure
Future funding, grants, CIP: Capacity-based
Contacts:
• Use focus group members as contacts for additional info, data requests, etc.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1764
Focus Group Meetings – MOBILITY
Aug 22, 2022
SamTrans
- Will provide us with their draft Bus Feasibility Study that recommends in-lane bus stops, bus bulb outs, ped and sidewalk improvements (infrastructure that needs to be provided by the City or Caltrans)
- They also have a Reimagine SamTrans report that is going to increase weekend service Bauhaus
- Wants density (more multi-modal, fewer cars), climate change action (reduce GHG, provide shade), and provision for e-bikes and scooters
- Thinks current safety is a big deterrent
- Strongly wants dedicated bike routes and intersection priority for bikes - Wants improved ECR crossings
- Wants downtown to be “pleasant” with fountain, cobblestone, etc. - Floated the idea of a Barcelona-style “superblock”
- Encouraged higher parking pricing
Meredith
- Wants better traffic light timing for buses on ECR
- Believes bulb-outs and traffic calming changes have actually increased injuries - Wants separated facilities for bicyclists
Attendee
- Need a parking management plan to price appropriately and manage supply - Strongly supports the closure
- Supports more secure bike parking and notes that e-bike challenges (e.g. need street-level parking)
- Curious to know how many peds are walking in the closure area - Questions if businesses are negatively impacted by closure – would like to see data - The street closure has created an unfortunate wall effect - Parklets need to be designed to face the street
Caltrans
- Happy with Redwood City and Sunnyvale’s process for parking removal - Encouraged use of Caltrans SB743/TDM online resources Sonia
- Noted that bike/ped plan is pre-COVID – more people walking and biking now - Believes the currently planned shared lanes for bikes are insufficient - Supports taking away parking for bike lanes
- Wants to expand closure
- Thinks people should be able to park further away and walk - Wondered if one-way streets would be preferable if it could result in more space for bike lanes - Would like secure bike parking (with a mirrored wall!) - Wants better downtown bike signage (i.e. not walk your bike signs at all times)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1765
- Supports better ECR crossings
Attendee
- Consider using the alleys as bikeways
- Notes that more cars are returning making walking/biking less safe - Need more micromobility options from Caltrain
- Likes the 8:80 rule
- Support for on-street bike corrals/scooter parking
- Noted the San Mateo senior get-around program as a case study

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1766
Focus Group Meeting – SENIORS-CHILDREN-SPECIAL NEEDS
Aug 24, 2022
Focus Group:
• Caitlyn Matoso, Supervisor, Adult Community Center
• Susan Rose, Arbor Bay School (children in K-8th grade with mild to moderate learning differences)
• Terra Fuller, Executive Director, Art BIAS
• Linda Scannell, Coordinator, Adult Community Center (not in attendance) • Monica Nunez, California Clubhouse (not in attendance) • Jami and Abe, RRM
Susan: Director – Arbor Bay School non-public school located at Kiwanis building burton park • Serves on the family committee
• San Carlos resident since 1987
Terra – Art BIAS 30-year anniversary
• 52 artists – all different media
• Starting to have more community events (First Sunday, Open Studios) • Affordable artists’ studio – turning into an arts center with a lot of activities • 1700 Industrial Road – Industrial area
Caitlyn
• Works for San Carlos Adult Community Center
• Before was overseeing youth programs

INTRODUCTIONS
Terra:
• Excited about keeping Laurel open
• Fueling creativity, European outdoor walking vibe
• Would love to be located in the central area
• How envision Downtown: retail/restaurant opportunity
Susan
• Lives west of Downtown
• Cuts over to cedar to go to Burton Park, but walk downtown once a week. • Loves walkability, proximity

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1767
• Along SC Avenue, retail is “hit or miss” – some established stores, some revolving/evolving (S. side of Laurel)
• Kids walk along Arroyo to get to Laurel Street
• Would like to see more mix of retail. Some mom-and-pop stores lost. • Variety of places to work – some Arbor Bay students employed in summer programs and internships around Laurel.
• Would like Laurel to go one-way southbound from Walnut to Olive, and Walnut to go northbound! allows for wider sidewalks.

Terra – creating vibrancy in Industrial Arts Business District • Would like more of a connection
• Mural at Industrial Arts District and Bianchini’s – murals connecting the neighborhoods • Build foot activity in IABD in tandem with Laurel
• Coming from all over the area – non-residents visiting San Carlos for lunch SCOOT and other options for kids and seniors
Susan
• Used to have SCOOT. SCOOT-like transportation Laurel Street to IABD to encourage a connected community between IABD and Downtown
• SCOOT was funded through City and was somewhat popular • Why did it disappear? Not sure.
• For people too old to drive or not old enough to drive Caitlyn
• No transportation for kids or seniors. (Ready Wheels and Lyft for seniors). SamTrans for kids.

Get word out that folks they represent

INDUSTRIAL ARTS AREA
• 9/10 mile from IABD to part of Downtown. definitely walkable. • Susan has walked around there – would not walk to the IAA right now • NOT a pleasant walk from IAA to Downtown. Hot sun and no greenery. • Connect Downtown corridor to Industrial Arts Area – would be amazing to integrate the two areas so that they feel some connection between both sides of the tracks!

DOWNTOWN
• Seniors walk around downtown
• Folks are enjoying the street closure now (maybe weren’t for it at first!) – more space to walk • unsafe crossing at San Carlos and Laurel
• Also San Carlos and Walnut – unsafe-feeling intersection

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1768

LAUREL STREET
• Terra: would like to be pushed further – now still feels like a street. Would like it to be a true park-like space; cobblestones, fountain

EL CAMINO REAL
• Susan: not interesting, not pleasant, love to walk to antique shops! • asks what the Plan will address related to ECR
• Jami: Retail and Land Use – housing above retail – what look like? • Terra: mentions In-pavement graphics across the street near Domenico’s (sp) – lots of options to integrate art

ALLEYS AND PARKING
Caitlyn
• alleys are tough for seniors (and everyone) – not accessible, uneven pavements, lots of trash, • Never finds an issue parking downtown!

MEETING CLOSE
Question: will there be meetings in-person special meetings to groups like the senior center, etc.

Jami- will have other tools like the online survey and online map that are purposeful Susan: Many families coming to San Carlos – it’s a destination. People pend the day in San Carlos who aren’t residents of San Carlos.

Susan asks about more outreach to under-involved groups. Can somebody show up at farmers markets, school groups, etc. to get folks that wouldn’t normally come to a workshop?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1769
Focus Group Meetings – DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES AND EVENTS
Aug 30, 2022
Attendees
• Wendy Schettino (City Parks Dept)
o parks and rec
• Tyler Muela (City Parks Dept)
o Rec manager – was on the walking tour
• Lauren Schneider (City Parks Dept)
o new to the department (April), so new to the Specific Plan • Amy Buckmaster (Farmers Market, Chamber of Commerce)
o CEO chamber SM County
o Representative of DTAC
o familiarity with San Carlos – grew up there
o was on steering comm for redwood city dt precise plan o CBD Redwood City – Chamber now runs day-to-day operations for that (check on this) o Amy - COC ROLE:
• Good at fundraising, COC supports parks and rec in their programs • Provides funding for farmers market and arts and wine festival FARMERS MARKET AT 600 BLOCK
Wendy:
• Happy to be back downtown
• Farmers market (Sunday mornings 9a-1p) have room to grow – the official footprint also includes Cherry to the alleys,
o blocked at wheeler currently
o working around bulbouts – eats into real estate
o average booth 10x10 or 10x20.
o at height of summer – up to 40 vendors (now have 25 vendors) o used to be at nights (heyday!) – downtown was sleepier then (hot harvest nights)  had to close streets at 2 – businesses were not happy, in 2011 decided to move back to morning
o some nearby communities have two – RC has weekday evening (seasonal May-Sept) in addition to weekend day.

ART AND WINE FARE
• Art and wine fair October 8 and 9: Arroyo to San Carlos, ECR to Elm • Westbound lanes on ECR are closed [did I hear this right?] • Holly and arroyo continue through, so San Carlos, Cherry and Olive are closed. • Emergency services requires that all vendors need to go against the curb (outdoor seating) • 12 and 13 blocks of SC Avenue – can not put
• 1100 block of SC or 700 block of Laurel – cannot put vendors • Palo Alto medical center – shuttle service and parking (go north to harbor and circle around)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1770
Tyler: businesses now used to the street closure now, so may be more open for change in time for farmers market. Many businesses closed after 5 so may be fine with street closure.

Lauren:
• Block party in July – farmers market footprint bled into wheeler plaza, so 600-700 plaza but didn’t have booths – many businesses don’t like.
• Addition of temporary parklets doesn’t allow to add booths for events • If pedestrians only, how to integrate space for event booths/vendors Wendy:
• Gets question why not more events in SOLA
• Arroyo South to Eaton– no blocks without residential, so street event is problematic • Some do not have alley access

MOBILITY AND PARKING
• Arroyo south on ECR – across from Trader Joes and nearby: a lot of underused parking. but feels far.

Prompt: Do people use Caltrain parking lot? Or Wheeler Plaza? • No - underutilized
• Wheeler Plaza is a “hidden gem” because it is underused, so always parking there. Currently most people use streets.
• Wayfinding needed from Holly and ECR – need to let motorists know.

Other discussion
• Digital parking information would be great. There is a sensitivity to a small-town downtown feel, but signage can be integrated well.
• Ride-sharing drop-off points – needs to be thought through and incorporated into. • Amy (chamber) chat: would love to see bollard design on laurel blocks if that is included in the Transportation plan

EVENT BANNERS
• Wendy: Banner program needs to be pumped up (look at what Redwood City is doing) • Amy: COC chat re. banner program « but we fund ours through the CBID unfortunately) • Tyler: Downtown Laurel Street Banner – cross-street Banner at 800 block. used to advertise events – very popularly requested by event planners. Could be a digital version, keeping it to community-based communications. Or incorporate more cross-street signs (but public works has to coordinate the process and labor, time to place them). There are more events than ability to accommodate all that want to have a banner there.
• Wendy: have to be aware of wind when placing banner
Wendy asks about bike lanes – ECR and San Carlos Avenue Jami – plan is looking at all transportation aspects, we’re at preliminary stages and will be exploring and getting back ideas

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1771

UPCOMING COMMUNITY EVENTS
• Oct 8/9 – wine faire
• Goblin Walk end of October
• Night of Holiday nights – first Friday in December
Next Steps
• Wendy to send map of Arts and Wine Fair
• Wendy to send map of banner pole locations
• RRM to confirm we have latest list of events

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1772
17 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Appendix C
Community Workshop and Open House information and
notes:
• Community Workshop #1 - Breakout Room notes
• Community Workshop #1 - Chat Transcript
• Community Workshop #1 - Slido survey results
• Community Workshop #2 - Slido survey results
• Community Workshop #2 - Q/A transcript
• Coffee and Comments Open House summary
• Coffee and Comments Open House - dot voting excercise data
• Coffee and Comments Open House - panel post it
comments data

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1773
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1774
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

2 PROMPTS
Notetakers would be taking notes on the google doc but that they would not be sharing their screen while doing so.

Facilitators will have a slide they can share (includes study area and additional links/info).

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1775
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1776
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1777
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

Even a pop-up, kids could write post-its on.
- Al Savay: We have a local teen advisory committee we could try to engage.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1778
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1779
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1780
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1781
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1782
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1783
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1784
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

More retail options, goes to the reading bug (?), good w/ kids.

Agrees with previous comments. Friends come to visit & more often go to other downtowns for dinner. Not as many options. Also more of the retired are leaving but restaurants close early.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1785
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

13 Taking into consideration the changing of demographics. Would like to see more diversity in the restaurant choices. All seem the same.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1786
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1787
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1788
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

Diana: Community Foundation member. Having some type of event night where everyone in San Carlos can come together.

Diana: Wants to make sure there is event space. There are no theaters and other community spaces in SC. We should improve that.

Allison: Wants to think of the downtown area as a park. As you walk out of a store you feel safe. Parking should be tucked away. Doesn’t always feel safe when mixing peds w cars.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1789
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

17 Diana: People say that downtown SC has a “European feel”. We should build on that.

Elizabeth: Focus on streetscape, human-scale development.

Donna: Focus on how the different forms of transportation can work better together.

Elizabeth: Areas for seating throughout, connected public space, people having better experiences in the public spaces.

Diana: Older generation may need to park closer. How can you accommodate that? AA: You can prioritize ADA spaces towards the center of downtown closest to storefronts.

Diana: Bring back shuttle (SCOOT) funding. Find funding for shuttles downtown.

Allison: Have public restrooms. Helps people stay longer downtown. People use Peet’s now.

Donna: Continue to bring in and expand events downtown. Current events are wonderful draws, would like to have more all ages events. Bring people together as a community.

Diana: Similar to Los Gatos. Wants to keep it feeling unique. Independent stores give it the right feel, versus chains in Burlingame.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1790
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

Keep Laurel street close, it will make DT a better place. Once Lauren Street is closed we can see how restaurants and retails do creative things. We are blessed with great weather.

Rajesh Krishnan - 9 years in San Carlos. Children 5-10, like to see where kids can learn how to bike, something for young children and family to enjoy instead of just restaurants.

Want to learn more the impact on street closure.

Types of businesses have changed throughout the year. There was a woolworth, now there is Diddams, something for everyone.

Need to think about activities, for example, once upon a time the Yoga Health Center did Yoga classes outside.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1791
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1792
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

20 sidewalks, renovated whole area, gives it much newer premier shopping destination.

Paid for by City and landlords. More consolidation of spaces, easier to coordinate.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1793
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

Concerns: Agree alleys are a mess, but it would be really hard to get deliveries if not there.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1794
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

22 Are design considerations part of the plan or only size and use? Brian: Yes, we are considering everything we can.

I live close to downtown and walk a lot. I feel super lucky to be able to do that.

So many restaurants having so much outdoor space is great. Outdoor dining serves as a great public utility. I would be in favor of expanding the outdoor space and also allowing them to pay for it.

Josh Wallace - San Carlos does not do enough to preserve its history. I hope this plan does that. San Carlos should be more proactive and advocate for preservation for the little that is left.

Carlos Club.

3. Brian: Any specific buildings you think should be saved?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1795
San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Workshop 1 Breakout Room Notes
August 31, 2022

23 Not much left except Carlos Club. Light house is gone, neon sign, I have tried to work with the City to do what they can to save this place.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1796
file:///N/...unity%20Engagement/Workshops/Workshop%20%231%20Aug%2031%202022/Workshop%20Summary/meeting_saved_chat.txt[4/13/2023 2:30:35 PM]

MEETING CHAT TRANSCRIPT
17:49:30 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Waiting Room Participants:

Hello! Please write any questions in this chat feature and please send them to all meeting hosts / cohosts. Thank you! 18:28:10 From Lena's iPad to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Yes, it is to EVERYONE…participants and hosts.
18:29:13 From Caroline Bauhaus to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Thanks for this overview. How is the team integrating best practices/examining model cities regarding “people first” city design? In my 30 years in SC most conversations about downtown focus on cars. Focusing on people and increasing foot traffic in the downtown will benefit our businesses 18:29:24 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Lena's iPad(Direct Message):
wonderful.
18:29:28 From Karen Molinari, HCT, (She/her) to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Alleys can be used for bicycling traffic with cars moved behind those in parking lots. 18:29:46 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Caroline Bauhaus(Direct Message):
caroline can you send that to everyone
18:30:12 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Karen Molinari, HCT, (She/her)(Direct Message):
can you send that to everyone?
18:30:45 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
https://www.slido.com/
18:30:52 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
3606582
18:30:53 From Mary Bates to Everyone:

Are there any decisions made on the permanent closure of Laurel street? 18:32:11 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

I cn
18:32:30 From Richard Domaszewicz to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

I can't get to my browser while on Zoom! Now what?
18:32:54 From mariashaldybin to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

What happens in San Carlos, stays in San Carlos
18:33:48 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

How do I get to my browser?
18:34:04 From Samina Ginwalla (she/her) to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Just to confirm, if you are on DTAC we can’t poll right? 18:34:30 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Explain jhow to open a new tab===on a mac?
18:35:11 From Caroline Bauhaus to Everyone:

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1797
file:///N/...unity%20Engagement/Workshops/Workshop%20%231%20Aug%2031%202022/Workshop%20Summary/meeting_saved_chat.txt[4/13/2023 2:30:35 PM] 18:35:22 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
how many are in the workshop
18:35:34 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Nancy Oliver(Direct Message):
control T for a new tab
18:36:00 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Jami Williams, RRM Design Group(Direct Message):
149
18:36:08 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
scroll downt please
18:36:28 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

If folks are still stuck using the poll feature, perhaps you can invite folks to enter their answer in the Chat window to ensure you are capturing feedback.
18:36:42 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Control T does nothing! so now what?
18:36:54 From Jami Williams, RRM Design Group to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
can i jump in with a comment?
18:36:55 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

Answer to question—not easy to get to.
18:39:14 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Historical information.
18:39:27 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Better handicapped parking close in.
18:39:47 From Josh Wallace to Everyone:
…or saving historic building
18:40:24 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Go to SC—none pf the above!
18:40:37 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

None of the above.
18:41:12 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Can't afford to eat out very much!
18:41:24 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Father of San Carlos.
18:42:33 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Retail, but not more restaurants.
18:44:00 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Mixed use with retail.
18:44:35 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

Walk with cane. Need close-in parking.
18:46:32 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Nancy Oliver(Direct Message):
thank you appreciate you sharing!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1798
file:///N/...unity%20Engagement/Workshops/Workshop%20%231%20Aug%2031%202022/Workshop%20Summary/meeting_saved_chat.txt[4/13/2023 2:30:35 PM] 18:46:38 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Improved sidewalks and closer parking.
18:47:32 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

I'm sure you are aware that many cities are re-envisioning their downtowns following the changes brought by the pandemic. I wanted to mention that Santa Barbara is currently also working with consultants to remake their downtown. It might be interesting for the team to check in to see if there are any innovative ideas that can be considered for inspiration in San Carlos! Realizing of course that the styles of these two cities are distinct.
18:49:05 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Private parking (bank), or street parking if available near my destination 18:49:38 From Maggie to Everyone:

I'm not clear if the SamTrans is public parking?
18:49:57 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Stanford U.
18:53:22 From Mike to Everyone:

For improvements to downtown and alleys why haven’t the choices of traffic and parking been provided. These are big issues. Have to find a way to make cars work and the alleys may be a viable option since they already handle deliveries etc
18:54:41 From Kristen Clements (she/her) to Everyone:
slido was fun - i liked it
18:55:15 From Monette's iPad to Everyone:

Slide was easy to use.
18:55:19 From Mark Stieglitz to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):
slido was great, easy!
18:55:46 From Helen Mickiewicz to Everyone:

Thank you for answering my question.
18:56:46 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

That building's leasing is covered by Caltrain.
18:57:32 From Josh Wallace to Everyone:

Please consider pro-actively protecting the few “historic” buildings/places we have. 18:57:37 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

Their urgency to get such buildings leased is...not as urgent as a private landlord's urgency might be.

I'm friends with the leasing agent that typically covers that type of building lease for Caltrain. I'll email him now.
18:57:53 From Wayne Macktinger to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Need to excuse myself now. I have a keen knowledge of the retail real estate space. Available to discuss how I may able to “give back' to SC, as a long term resident here. Feel free to reach out to me @ 650-595-4300. W. Macktinger

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1799
file:///N/...unity%20Engagement/Workshops/Workshop%20%231%20Aug%2031%202022/Workshop%20Summary/meeting_saved_chat.txt[4/13/2023 2:30:35 PM] 18:57:55 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

The depot bui;ding was unfortunately almost eliminated from view with the encroachmenbt of th apartment buildings--too close to the depot. And yes, it eliminaged the use of the building as a restaurant. 18:58:01 From Pranita Venkatesh to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Polling was insightful and the results are immediate. Well done 18:58:49 From Mark Stieglitz to Everyone:

Slido was great, easy!
18:58:52 From Vivienne Kelvin - Vabrato to Everyone:

What's happening to the Depot Café?
18:59:27 From Elizabeth Chun to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

But Sam Tran has all these signs on the top floor that says no parking. 18:59:30 From Helen Mickiewicz to Everyone:

Thanks for that answer.
18:59:41 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

Depot could be a good spot for the museum…
18:59:52 From Mike to Everyone:

I posted a question earlier about cars and traffic and parking. What is the plan for improving car and parking for downtown incl use of alley space
18:59:56 From Nancy Oliver to Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group)(Direct Message):

Will Cal Train Parking be free of charge in the evenings and on weekends? 19:00:47 From Vivienne Kelvin - Vabrato to Everyone:

Can you pave Laurel Steet like we have in all major cities in Europe (for years) 19:00:58 From Mike to Everyone:

Please do NOT compare this to Santana Row. Some of that thinking went into the commercial space at the Caltrain Depot and it is not the right fit
19:03:57 From Ariela St Pierre to Everyone:

Why will it take so long to develop the plan?
19:03:59 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
here is the Downtown Specific Plan project website https://www.sancarlosdowntownplan.com/ 19:04:01 From Alexander Kent to Everyone:

There are two new restaurants opening in the new construction portion of the "Trestle" project: 1) Impasto Pizzeria, and 2) Out of the Barrel Taproom.
19:04:11 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

Laurel street needs to be closed to traffic permanently and replaced with mixed use streets that include pedestrian and cycling only features (not cars), complete with retractable bollards to aid with events, emergencies, etc. This should compliment the work being done for the pedestrian safety planning. I still get almost hit every time I walk down Laurel street. Ironically, it's never happened to me on El Camino. 19:04:43 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

Mike, did you just raise your voice at me?
19:05:31 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

Further, the former laundry mat at 722 Laurel is going to be Hapa's, a brewpub with a few existing

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1800
file:///N/...unity%20Engagement/Workshops/Workshop%20%231%20Aug%2031%202022/Workshop%20Summary/meeting_saved_chat.txt[4/13/2023 2:30:35 PM] locations. https://hapasbrewing.com/
19:08:00 From Lena's iPad to Everyone:

Thank you!
19:08:04 From Greg Lowitz to Everyone:

Agreed
19:08:28 From Rajesh Krishnan to Everyone:
thanks!
19:08:31 From Will Strohl to Everyone:

Agreed!
19:14:06 From Rachel Raynor, AICP (RRM Design Group) to Everyone:
thank you to everyone participating in this evening's workshop!

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1801
Downtown San Carlos
Workshop Online Survey
24 Aug - 30 Sep 2022
Poll results

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1802
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – What is the city motto for San
Carlos?
1 0 0
Preserving the Past to Enhance the Future
1 %
Land of Gracious Living
0 %
City of Good Living
94 %
What happens in San Carlos, stays in San Carlos
4 %
America’s Finest City
1 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1803
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Please check all that apply: 1 0 0
I live in Downtown San Carlos
17 %
I live within walking distance of Downtown San Carlos
64 %
I work in Downtown San Carlos
16 %
I shop, eat, and/or utilize a service in Downtown San Carlos 76 %
I own a business and/or commercial property in Downtown San Carlos
12 %
I am just curious about the project
30 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1804
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(1/4)
0 9 3
Poorly planned
Convenient
direct
long
Charming
Vibrant
Unbalanced
Jumbled
needs TOD
Friendly
Funny
Strollable
Charming
Neighborly
Limited
haphazard
Unfinished
Hometown
Charming
Small-town
Not youthful
Old fashioned
Welcoming
Cute
Vibrant
Charming
community
Fun

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1805
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(2/4)
0 9 3
Comfortable
Fun
Confortable
linear
Restaraunts
Meh
Fun
Disappointing
Messy
Lively
friendly
Dangerous
Yummy
Pleasant
potential
Cozy
Charming
fun
Congested
Confused
vibrant
Entertaining
Haphazard
Hometown
Community
Friendly
Vibrant
Nice

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1806
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(3/4)
0 9 3
Community
Opportunity
Charming
jumbled
Enjoyable
cute
Pleasant
Overpriced
Cluttered.

Charming
Welcoming
Welcoming
Vibrant
Character
Downtown
fun
Dated
Neighborhood
small
Vibrant
Outdated
Changing
Friendly
Relaxing
A mess
Liveable
Youthful
Shopping

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1807
Open text poll
If you could describe Downtown San Carlos in
one word, what would it be?
(4/4)
0 9 3
home
Charming
Charming
Charming
Community
Chaotic
Vibrant
Versatile
Dead

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1808
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements would
you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check
all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 4
Beautification, street trees, and landscaping
82 %
Enhanced aesthetics of the commercial character/building design 64 %
Highlighted culture and history of the Downtown with plaques or signage
35 %
Additional outdoor gathering/seating areas (plazas, pocket parks, paseos, etc.)
76 %
Enhanced outdoor dining areas
70 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1809
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following improvements would
you like to see in Downtown San Carlos? (check
all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 4
Additional gateway and wayfinding signage
23 %
Public art
54 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1810
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following uses would you like to
see more of within Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 6
Shops
68 %
Restaurants
95 %
Culture and entertainment
27 %
Personal services (beauty supply, nail salon, tailor, etc.) 46 %
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 15 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1811
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following uses would you like to
see more of within Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 6
Gathering spaces
23 %
Housing options
3 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1812
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – The namesake for Drake’s
located at the corner of San Carlos Avenue and
El Camino Real is:
0 9 0
Canadian rapper Drake
6 %
The urban dictionary definition for a lower class of dragon or a higher class of serpent
1 %
Sir Francis Drake the daring English explorer in the 16th century 7 %
Mr. Frederick Drake known as the father of “San Carlos” 87 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1813
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street 600-800 blocks (from San
Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of the
following uses would you like to see? (check all
that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 6
Retail
85 %
Restaurant
94 %
Professional Offices
22 %
Medical services/ medical offices
15 %
Boutique hotels
11 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1814
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along Laurel Street 600-800 blocks (from San
Carlos Avenue to Arroyo Avenue) which of the
following uses would you like to see? (check all
that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 6
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 41 %
Standalone housing (apartments, condominiums, or multi-family homes)
6 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1815
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along El Camino Real which of the following
uses would you like to see? (check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 5
Retail
65 %
Restaurant
54 %
Professional Offices
66 %
Medical services/ medical offices
55 %
Auto-related uses
31 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1816
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Along El Camino Real which of the following
uses would you like to see? (check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 5
Hotels
45 %
Mixed use (lofts or apartments above retail, restaurants, or office) 63 %
Standalone housing (apartments, condominiums, or multi-family homes)
29 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1817
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question – The citizens of San Carlos
voted to incorporate as a city in:
0 9 0
June 1925
48 %
November 1922
14 %
January 1940
22 %
June 1933
16 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1818
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you typically get around Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 6
Walk/assistive devices
94 %
Bike/e-bike
21 %
Skate/Scooter
1 %
Drive
72 %
Rideshare - Uber/Lyft
2 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1819
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
How do you typically get around Downtown San
Carlos? (check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 6
Public Transit
3 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1820
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(1/2)
0 9 8
Improved sidewalks
70 %
Enhanced pedestrian crossings
66 %
Additional bicycle lanes and bicycle racks
46 %
Shared e-bikes
21 %
Shared e-scooters
10 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1821
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Which of the following mobility improvements
would you like to see in Downtown San Carlos?
(check all that apply)
(2/2)
0 9 8
Enhancements to alleyways
76 %
Improvements to public transit service or amenities (such as bus stops or shelters)
32 %
Better access to the Caltrain Station
42 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1822
Multiple-choice poll
If you parked once and walked around, how far
are you willing to walk to your destination?
(select your preferred distance)
0 9 9
half a block
2 %
about one block
4 %
about two blocks
20 %
5-minute walk
32 %
10-minute walk
41 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1823
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
Where do you prefer to park when you visit
Downtown? (select the most often used)
0 9 8
Street parking
49 %
Public parking in lots or alleyways behind businesses
42 %
Public parking structure
53 %
Private parking associated with the business I am visiting 17 %
I do not park in Downtown
14 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1824
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(1/4)
0 9 9
Log Gatos Los Altos
Redwood city
Burlingame (agree with sentiment
on paid parking - I hate it - so
annoying)
Orange
Burlingame
Burlingame, San Mateo
Burlingame and RwC
Mateo burlingame redwood city
Redwood City or San Mateo
Burlingame and Palo have many
retail/restaurant options but not a
fan of paid parking.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1825
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(2/4)
0 9 9
Burlingame
Belmont
Palo Alto
Palo Alto
Used to be Burlingame but allot of
shops and restaurants have closed
Palo Alto
Menlo Park
Burlingame
Mt View
San Mateo and Redwood City
Palo Alto
Burlingame and Redwood City
and Palo Alto
Menlo Park
Mountain view
Burlingame
Burlingame, San Mateo
Menlo Park
Redwood City
Burlingame
Redwood City
Burlingame
Los Gatos
Los Altos
redwood city
Palo Alto

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1826
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(3/4)
0 9 9
Burlingame
San Mateo
Redwood City
Palo Alto or Burlingame
Palo Alto
none
Redwood city
Burlingame
Palo Alro
Burlingame
Mountain View
University Avenue
Palo alto
Belmont (just kidding)
Redwood City Burlingame
redwood city
Palo Alto
Palo alto
Menlo Park
Redwood city
Menlo park
Menlo Park
Los Gatos
Redwood
Palo Alto
Redwood City
Redwood City
None

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1827
Open text poll
What is your favorite downtown to visit on the
Peninsula other than San Carlos?
(4/4)
0 9 9
Palo Alto
Redwood City
Burlingame
Palo Alto
Palo Alto California Street
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Palo Alto
Burlingame
San Mateo
Redwood City
Palo Alto
Palo Alto
San Mateo
Millbrae
Burlingame
Palo Alto & Burlingame
Redwood City
redwood city
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame
Burlingame

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1828
Multiple-choice poll
Trivia Question - The massive stone blocks used
to make the San Carlos Train Depot were excess
materials from the construction of:
0 9 7
Stanford University
75 %
The Folger Coffee Company Building
4 %
Argonaut Hotel
1 %
Southern Pacific Building
15 %
University of California, Berkeley
4 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1829
San Carlos PPT Questions
13 - 16 Feb 2023
Poll results

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1830
Table of contents
1) Looking at these inspirational photos, and keeping in mind other places you’ve been, in your opinion what is the most important element or feature you would like us to incorporate into the downtown Vision? (one word answers) 2) Think back to some of your most unforgettable experience in the public realm – what was it about that space that made it unforgettable? What was the experience like? How did it make you feel? (one word)
3) Why do you currently go to Downtown San Carlos?
4) When you go the 700 block, today, what draws you there? Specifically, what is the reason you currently go to this location? (One word answer.) 5) The City has been hearing many comments and support for closing the 700 block permanently. Do you agree yes or no?
6) What is your highest priority for public spaces in the downtown area? (Select one.) 7) Please rank the amenities in order of importance to you in the downtown core. (Rank all where #1 is the MOST important.)
8) I would like to see more of the following in Downtown (select all that apply):
9) What types of programs or entertainment would you

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1831
Table of contents
like to see downtown? (Select all that apply.)
10) Which is your preferred 700 block option?
11) I would go downtown more often __________. (Select two.)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1832
Wordcloud poll
1) Looking at these inspirational photos, and keeping in mind other places you’ve been, in your opinion what is the most important element or feature you would like us to incorporate into the downtown Vision? (one word answers)
0 5 2
Gathering
Walkability
safety Inviting Seating
Large trees
Dining
Accessibility
water feature
variety
inclusive
easy
creativity
clean
accessible
Whimsy
Walking
Usability
Trees
Smalltownfeel
Sidewalks
Shade
People
Paths
OpenSpace
Modernize
Modern
Humancentric
Gatherings
Fountain
Foliage
Focalpoint
Community
Comfort
Colorful
Closed 700 block
Car free
Bicycles
Activity

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1833
Wordcloud poll
2) Think back to some of your most unforgettable experience in the public realm – what was it about that space that made it unforgettable? What was the experience like? How did it make you feel? (one word) 0 5 5
Vibrant
Welcoming
Nature
Inviting
Community Clean
comfortable
Trees
Cozy
relaxed
peoplewatching
openwalkway
nature/green
innovative
fun
architectural
Wellbeing
Spacious
SmallTown
Safety Size
Relaxing
Live music
Inclusive
Flowery Food
Eating outside
Connected
Charming
Charm
Awestruck
Atmosphere
Artistic
Art
Activity
Active

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1834
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
3) Why do you currently go to Downtown San
Carlos?
(1/2)
0 5 7
Eat
91 %
Shop
82 %
Work
19 %
Services (auto repair, tailor, nail salon, etc.)
47 %
Farmers Market or Special Events
68 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1835
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
3) Why do you currently go to Downtown San
Carlos?
(2/2)
0 5 7
To catch the Train or bus on ECR
33 %
I live Downtown
4 %
To visit Laurel Street
56 %
None of the above
0 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1836
Wordcloud poll
4) When you go the 700 block, today, what draws you there? Specifically, what is the reason you currently go to this location? (One word answer.) 0 5 6 Restaurants
Carfree
DiningShops
Town Restaurant
Shop
Outdoordining
Nothing
stroll
reading bug
eating
banking
Walking on street
Stores
Restaurant
Readingbug
Outside dining
Outing
Harrington Park
Getaway
Farmers market
Drinks
Dog friendly dining
Crowded
Coffee
Bank

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1837
Multiple-choice poll
5) The City has been hearing many comments
and support for closing the 700 block
permanently. Do you agree yes or no?
0 5 3
Yes
77 %
No
23 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1838
Multiple-choice poll
6) What is your highest priority for public spaces
in the downtown area? (Select one.)
0 5 5
I want to enjoy a public space and the sense of community 62 %
I want to go somewhere with my kids
5 %
I want to be able to eat lunch outside
18 %
I would like events and programs
15 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1839
Ranking poll
7) Please rank the amenities in order of
importance to you in the downtown core. (Rank
all where #1 is the MOST important.)
(1/2)
0 5 1

1. Tree canopy

6.43 2. Open air with some shade covering

6.22 3. Lawn or landscaping

5.33 4. Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas)

5.22 5. Stage/music venue

4.86 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1840
Ranking poll
7) Please rank the amenities in order of
importance to you in the downtown core. (Rank
all where #1 is the MOST important.)
(2/2)
0 5 1

5. Bistro lighting

4.86 7. Public Art

4.77 8. Fountain/ Water feature

3.88 9. Area where children can play

3.43 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1841
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
8) I would like to see more of the following in
Downtown (select all that apply):
(1/2)
0 6 0
Outdoor dining
48 %
Street furnishings
68 %
Plazas
73 %
Public art
68 %
Wayfinding (signs w/direction, distance)
30 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1842
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
8) I would like to see more of the following in
Downtown (select all that apply):
(2/2)
0 6 0
Street trees
70 %
Bicycle parking
35 %
Other
8 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1843
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
9) What types of programs or entertainment
would you like to see downtown? (Select all that
apply.)
(1/2)
0 6 3
Music events
75 %
Kid friendly programs
41 %
Theater/Performance pop up events
62 %
Cultural or art exhibits
70 %
Movies on the plaza/square
46 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1844
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
9) What types of programs or entertainment
would you like to see downtown? (Select all that
apply.)
(2/2)
0 6 3
Activities/yoga, tai chi, qi gong
35 %
Chess, backgammon, game night
37 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1845
Multiple-choice poll
10) Which is your preferred 700 block option? 0 6 4
Flexible Closure
9 %
Widened Sidewalk
22 %
Plaza Option
64 %
Pre-2020 Option
5 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1846
Multiple-choice poll (Multiple answers)
11) I would go downtown more often __________.
(Select two.)
0 6 7
If there was a permanent plaza / public gathering spaces 75 %
If there were wider sidewalks with adjacent parking
27 %
If I could drive down the 700 block, like before 2020
12 %
For Farmer’s Market and for other cool /fun events
64 %
Other
7 %

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1847
Slido Question User Name Sentiment Submission Date Submission Time Not a question. I will have to bet that fountains are frowned upon in the era of California droughts. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:21:31 I thought that the council voted 2 years ago that the 700 block would be permanently closed to traffic. Is that not the case? Sal Burns neutral 02/15/2023 19:24:09
Need special attention to easy bicycle access too. Don’t exclude e-bikes and bikes; actively invite them to the center of downtown safely! Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 19:24:27 Give us the poll questions please Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:24:59 Preservation of the existing trees Richard neutral 02/15/2023 19:28:19 I was trying to edit my response to the first question from “shade” to “trees” but I got cut off and cannot go back to it Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:28:55
I love sidewalk dining outside! Richard positive 02/15/2023 19:30:22 the outdoor dining setups in the 700 block obstruct visual access to the other businesses (shops & salon). Has that been addressed with those business owners? Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:34:31 I love all the parklets and outdoor dining. I do think there should be a single lane for cars to pass each direction. Heidi positive 02/15/2023 19:35:12 Whether or not I support closing the 700 block permanently depends on what accessibility measures are included. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:35:33 More sidewalk dining with at least a single one way lane open to traffic Richard neutral 02/15/2023 19:35:48 There’s no chat, only Q&A Heidi 02/15/2023 19:36:23
Keep small town feel by having 1-story buildings that makes the street "walkable" Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:36:27 Are the restaurants that have expanded their setups massively paying for occupying public space? The menu prices have surged at all restaurants Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:37:12 Please preserve & maximize landscaping. We need more tree canopy, not less. Heidi positive 02/15/2023 19:41:20 Harrington park V2- Love the fountain in that location! Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 19:42:41 700 block doesn’t need to close completely to keep and expand outdoor dining & gathering Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:43:49 Outdoor movies, etc. can take place on that current parking lot or in Burton Park. I like the idea of using that parking lot for this sort of thing too Heidi positive 02/15/2023 19:46:29 Restaurants need to be reigned in and not overtaking all of the sidewalks. Need walk ways or clear areas to walk Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:46:55 What about more shops and stores instead of food places? Also am missing the laundromat for bulky items. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:49:09 Fountains recycle water and are incredibly peaceful. Most major cities with incredible community gathering spaces have them. Sal Burns positive 02/15/2023 19:51:43 I wish by landscaping it’s specified things like planters, especially in place of the ugly orange boulders Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:52:00 Street parking is a waste of space and make our streets more unsafe. Any necessary parking should be consolidated in parking structures. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:52:30 having to walk down the middle of the street means hotter and no shade on warm days. And Windy and no shelter on cold days Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 19:52:35 I’d like flowers as landscaping, not lawn. They’re grouped together however Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:52:47 would love to see possibility for some smaller, local businesses. The rents on laurel are crazy. would love to see the city help them out Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 19:53:02 I would like to see more of the following in Downtown: Wider sidewalks, Less street parking Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 19:54:09

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1848
Slido Question User Name Sentiment Submission Date Submission Time 30 years ago the City removed & replace “mature” trees, now there is talk of replacing the trees again, !Hugh!, we must protect our heritage tree lined streets! Richard neutral 02/15/2023 19:55:04 Please let’s not remove trees, if activities need open space, let’s use that parking lot Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:56:12 Let’s underground all those power lines & phone lines Heidi negative 02/15/2023 19:57:57 While we’re at let’s underground all those obnoxious utility lines & poles Richard negative 02/15/2023 19:57:58 Let’s use gray water for the landscaping Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 19:58:18 Improve alleys to accommodate traffic & parking impacted by closing 700 block for more sidewalk dining Richard neutral 02/15/2023 20:00:28 Crosswalks can be improved by having them raised to sidewalk level instead of dropping to street level. Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 20:02:21 Please prioritize use of locally native species for trees and other landscaping. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:04:03 flexible closure: there is no outside dining? Yay Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:04:55 Losing 63 parking spots is not a trade off. Do it! Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:06:17 Please DO NOT harm the legacy trees within the heritage sidewalk dimensions! Richard positive 02/15/2023 20:07:25 Restaurants invested a lot of money in beautifying their dining parklets, such as Town. Others were reluctant to do this, afraid to lose their investment Heidi negative 02/15/2023 20:11:08 A lot of the existing street trees need to be better maintained if left. Most trees downtown are infected with aphids or other insects that drop on the ground Mike pardini negative 02/15/2023 20:12:33 Let’s lose the parking, keep one lane each way for cars, keep wide sidewalks & dining spaces Heidi negative 02/15/2023 20:12:57 Not all Laurel St. stores have alley access for deliveries. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:15:22 Q11: interesting/useful shops, entertainment events, free or low cost local transit Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 20:15:46 Other: I will go downtown more if there is adequate, safe bicycle parking and I can enjoy dining, shopping and socializing in a car-free environment Anonymous positive 02/15/2023 20:16:16 Question 11 : I’d come downtown more if there was informal street music , like in New Orleans. Creates great ambiance and atmosphere.Adds charm and energy. Jennifer positive 02/15/2023 20:16:48 When will there be a decision about closing 700 block permanently? Is it a city vote? A city council vote? Is there a timeline? Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:17:45
Making 700 block only as a whole plaza may attract more people but only to that block and lose sight of renewing the entire downtown as a whole. Imbalanced! Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:18:42 The plaza option does not show how the restaurants with current outdoor dining would be located Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:19:37 Why is 700 block being treated as special vs the whole downtown? Sounds like the 700 block is the only downtown. Anonymous neutral 02/15/2023 20:22:52
I agree, crossing El Camino Real is scary. Can we have a pedestrian bridge? Heidi negative 02/15/2023 20:24:30 Don't think you can address the 700 block by itself. Restaurants parklets are on several blocks each way and must be uniform. Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:25:50
This creates an unfair advantage for 700 block restaurants so assume they will be assessed initially and ongoing Anonymous negative 02/15/2023 20:26:55 Specially protecting the existing trees on Laurel is the question at hand Richard neutral 02/15/2023 20:31:00 Can we enable permanent park lifts for the entirety of Laurel Street for sidewalk, dining and other activities, trees, and flowers? Heidi neutral 02/15/2023 20:32:40

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1849
Downtown Specific Plan
City of San Carlos
March 4, 2023
Coffee and Comments Open House
Feedback Summary

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1850
2 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Background
As a follow up to virtual community workshop held on February 15, the City hosted an in-person Coffee and Comments Open House for the Downtown Specific Plan on March 4th, 2023 between 10 am to 12 pm at the City Library at 610 Elm Street.

Over 70 community members joined City staff for coffee and pastries and had an opportunity to ask staff questions, view the exhibits, share ideas, and give their feedback.

This process will last about two years, with completion targeted in spring 2024.

Event Overview

COFFEE AND COMMENTS OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1851
3 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Community Feedback by Themes
Closure on Laurel
• Community members want City to think big and bold in terms of vision for Downtown.
• Resounding support for extending closure of Laurel Street to all blocks, not just 700 Block.
• The community likes the walkable space currently on Laurel and supports extending it between Arroyo and San Carlos, and Walnut between San Carlos Ave and Cherry.
• People like having a street that is walkable and supports pedestrian activities like places to sit and have coffee.
• A few community members felt full closure plaza would be overdone.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1852
4 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Businesses
• Walkable, interesting/diverse businesses that are local. • Collection of local businesses, especially restaurants & cafes. • More new shops/cafes/ restaurants.
• Diversity of Businesses (Mom-n-Pop)
• Local business/ shops/cafes/ restaurants.
• Unique businesses that don’t make Laurel a food court.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1853
5 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1854

DOT VOTING EXERCISE
What is the highest prioirty for public spaces in the downtown area? (top 2 options) I want to enjoy a public space and the sense of community 27 I want to go somewhere with my kids 6
I want to be able to each lunch outside 13
I like events and programs 11
What amenities wouldyou like in the downtown core? (top 3 options) Fountain/ Water feature 12
Movable furniture (tables, chairs, umbrellas) 11
Lawn & landscaping 11
Area where children can play 7
stage music venue 11
Open air with some shade covering 18
Tree canopy 14
Bistro lighting 13
Public art 11
Why do you currently go to downtown?
Eat or drink (restaurants, cafes, coffee/boba shops) 38 Shop 26
Work 4
Services (dentist, tailor, nail salon, etc.) 10
Farmers Market, or Special Event (Art& Wine Fair, Goblin Walk, etc.) 32 To catch the train, or the bus along El Camino Real 7
Because I live in downtown 8
To visit, take a walk, or stroll along Laurel Street 34 None of the above 2 (Library)
What would you like to see more of in downtown?
Outdoor dining 21
Street furnishing 12
Plazas 16
Public Art 18
Wayfinding (signs with direction, distance)
Street trees 20
Bicycle Parking 14
Other
3 (Public restrooms, not
port-a-potty, Green
space, pakring
What types of programs or entertainment would you like to see in downtown? Music events 25

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1855
Kid friendly programs 6
Theatre/Performance pop up events 8
Cultural or art exhibits 18
Movies on the plaza/square 11
Activities/yoga, tai chi, qi gong 6
Chess, backgammom, game night 6
Which is your preferred 700 block option?
Flexible Closure 4
Widened Sidewalk 7
Plaza Option 24
Pre-2020 Option 3
Comment: Think bigger! Long plaza closed to cars, inviting to bikes and walkers, people centered. 4-5 blocks. Make bigger bolder otpions.

I would go downtown more often
If there was a permanent plaza/ public father spaces 25 If there were wider sidewalks with adjacent parking 7
If I could drive down the 700 block, like before 2020 2 For Farmer's Market and for other cool/ fun devents 21
Other

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1856

COMMENTS THROUGH POST-IT NOTES ON PANELS
Comments on Preliminary Concepts Poster
Please look more blocks. 700 only is missing a huge opportunity. Listen to the people not the noisy business owners that can move.

Please close the entire Laurel St, Brittan and San Carlos Ave. How can Europe be wrong?
Outdoor tables with benches so that people can sit and have their coffee or sandwich outside. They have these in other walkable cities. About 18" wide table with bench alongside so people sitting are facing the street.

Pave the entire street and get rid of the curb. Bring scooter back. Thanks! If Laurel Street is closing: retractable bollards
Diversity of Business (Mom-n-Pop)
Reduce height limits along Laurel to maintain "small town" Please extend street closure on Laurel. The walkable space is very nice when visiting downtown.

More new shops/cafes/ restaurants
Keep Laurel St. building heights low (MU-DC-100)
Improve Elm Street.
600 & 800 - Theme B, Opt 1, 700 - Theme B, Opt 2
Only closing 700 block seems lacking in vision. Close 3 blocks! 700 Only
In your opinion what is the most important element or feature you would like to us to incorporate into the Downtown vision
Inviting and safe, e-bike & bicycle routes and infrastructure Keeping block(s) closed for safety when walking and more room for outdoor seating for restaurants
San Carlos used to be a place where we actually treated each other like neighbors.

Think of each improvement with the perspective of how it will build a sense of community.

People Centric:
walk & bike friendly
gathering places
Shops & dining open to foot traffic
welcoming & inviting
Lots of greenscape & seating.

Community art
No cars. Can't believe how limited this plan is! Close Laurel! Seating in the middle of road. Close all of San Carlos to Arroyo. Kid friendly spaces & cornhole.

Public Art
No Cars
Closing Laurel between San Carlos Ave & Arroyo

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1857
Artistic displays that change (umbrella picture)
- utilize local artist to offer display times throughout year - tie/"link" from other planned areas (across ell Camino….wine/brewery/art "districts"/ area
Revitalize alleys with surprising/delightful art. That will attract pedestrians to walk through them.

Welcoming, central gathering place, e.g. piazza, square etc.

Walkable/ ample sidewalks
Local businesses, e.g. shops, restaurants, cafes,
Manicured landscaping
Parking
Walkable, interesting/diverse business that are local, Greenery/ Trees/ Plants, Bookstore
Safe bikes, micromobility access, places for kids to play while parents shop, e.g. playground, pump track!
The alleys - please do not improve them!!!
To encourage people, consider building a high-rise parking structure that converts over time to housing - it has to be plumbed & wired in advance for housing purposes. Thanks!
Less focus on cars, more focus on foot/bike traffic
Taller buildings, wider space between
Most of these photos show taller buildings than we have on Laurel.

Nobody wants to sit unshaded or unsheltered in the street. East side Laurel St awnings kept low to share their patrons.

Please make a pedestrian zone for as much of Laurel as possible and Walnut between San Carlos Ave and Cherry too. And make excellent, dedicated bike lanes leading to and through downtown that clearly separates pedestrians from bicyclists to keep the former safe and the latter encouraged to come downtown on bikes and wheels.

Plaza - like community space for gathering. Similar to the Museum Square in Redwood City. On the blocked off road in Redwood City in front of the movie theatre.

Invest in design concepts that inspire (unique lighting, seating and signage).

More pedestrian friendly. A space that welcomes people in. Something more than a strip mall.

Diversity in people and activities.

Having events & space where the community can gather.

Open green space
Collection of local businesses, especially restaurants & cafes Local artist/ musicians (not large bands) that provided an individualized "experience"
- Florence, Italy (opera singers in the middle of a parklet) How would you like to see the downtown alleys transform?

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1858
Better circulation,
connectivity to Laurel (pedestrian)
lighting & safety
focus height along El Camino, NOT Laurel
More hanging baskets, flowers and better lighting
You are trying to do too much with the alleys. They can't be people friendly, parking friendly, and delivery friendly ALL AT ONCE. Make Laurel street people friendly and alleys traffic & parking friendly.

Inviting to walk through, good lighting, more aesthetically pleasing What do you want to actually happen in the alleys day-to-day? Right now they aren't thoroughfares for peds - is this needed? How does the design/ plan support what you want to happen there? Not sure the plan offers enough to truly activate those spaces.

Put all services in one area on street that can have access to parking, i.e. North Laurel.

Fun street art for children to explore & discover, e.g. Hunt for mosaic animals, commemorative tiled, animal statues discretely placed.

Aesthetically pleasing strolling area or seating.

Native planting with signage for folks to learn about, the plant name, origin and fun fact.

Better lighting.

More tress and green space.

Local business/ shops/cafes/ restaurants
Paint sidewalks for pedestrians
Maintains East West Circulation.

Add parking with high density projects
Yes, decorative crosswalks
Yes, gateway feature
Yes, public parking, Walnut and Laurel
No, public parking BofA
No, alley near Cherry
No, alleyway murals
Keep alleys - alleys!!!
Theme A: Public Space Elements
Keep stage facing west. Fix City Hall Fountain before taking up sidewalk space on Laurel.

Theme B: Laurel Street (700 Block)
Add more explicit bicycle plans for complete routes downtown, e-bike parking next to plazas, video surveillance for crime prevention, and inviting infrastructure for bikes.

I have lived in San Carlos 48 years. Laurel St used to be filled with unique, small businesses. Now 700 Laurel St. is one big food court. Would love to see unique businesses return to 700 Laurel and have the ability to survive.

Do not get rid of street closure
Make the entire downtown care free.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1859
Prioritize Laurel as a destination, not a drive thru.

Get rid of street closures. Make more handicap and bicycle parking on street.

Leverage affordable housing and public parking between
Move "sidewalk" out to the center do ped aren't walking between buildings & tables.

Can we consider Option 1 but with the wider sidewalk of Option 2 Don’t close off 700 permanently. Need more businesses not food court Full Closure - no fountain in what is now street or sidewalk. You will never be able to change it. Fix the fountain between the City Hall and the library instead or put in a smaller recirculating water feature for birds & bees by the native plants FULL CLOSERE NO! Need more parking cause that is how people get around and now that so many drive electric they have no shame about it.

Full closure plaza concept!!
Full closure with open restaurant seating - no barriers or walls facing pedestrians who would walk on a boulevard in the middle of the street.

Keep flexible closure but make nicer.

Move plaza idea further south on Laurel, past Olive.

Keep parking same.

Talk to Businesses.

Don’t touch the alleys!
San Carlos Decision Makers and Consultants, Please think BIG & BOLD! Full Closure, make downtown vibrant, dynamic and welcoming for pedestrians and cyclists.

Don't do Full Closure, will turn San Carlos Downtown into Belmont Downtown, Not Good.

Do Option 2. Need a consistent look for all parklets along all of Laurel, not fair to other restaurants to only close 700 Laurel. Do they pay? Laurel - have consistency for 600, 700, 800 blocks. Prefer full closure, "pioneer move", visionary for the peninsula.

Laurel - Temporary closure depending on time of day. Say after 4pm allow the street to be open during the day, especially important for businesses that aren't restaurants.

Are there going to be public restrooms?
Return to how it was pre-pandemic.

San Carlos is more than a good court.

Closure hurts businesses that aren't restaurants.

Orange barriers are tacky
Fake foliage tacky
Having emergency exit along S.C Ave (Cuisinett)
Full Closure - Make it beautiful
Need nice public restrooms.

Greening and people centered ground, plaza ideas are great but these ideas are too tepid/ small! Close more blocks make long pedestrian plaza, invite bikes/ walkers as primary mode!! Go Big !!
Theme B, Option 1 is the most flexible solution to solve for the numerous stakeholders. Use bollards to help with open/ close.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1860
Full closure plaza would be overdone.

Full close as a plaza concept: retractable bollards for emergency ingress/ egress deliveries
Theme C: Alley Improvements
Wayfinding signs quickly become clutter
This gateway is at the exit from the alley. Are you planning on changing the direction of travel? (referring to the El Camino Really Alley from Laurel St.)

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1861
18 City of San Carlos Downtown Specific Plan
Appendix D
Community Survey Raw Data :
• Social Pinpoint survey data by themes ((Aug 8, 2022 - Jan 15, 2023)
• Online Survey - Preliminary Design Concepts (Mar 1 -
Apr 30, 2023) - interim results

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1862

Absolute SUBVERSIVENESS. Keep the trees, remove YOU.
00 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1863
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐06‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
How exactly do you do this? Is this the responsibility of street vendors or that of the City/Tax Payers? Moot point with no support for future improvement. BOT GENERATED RESPONSE ONCE MORE.
00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Would love to see Laurel closer to traffic most days…perhaps eliminate the sidewalks and install stone “wall‐to‐wall” like a European square. Install more artistic semi‐permanent Street barriers and include the ability for traffic to enter as necessary. Ideally this would be supported by additional very close parking.
12 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐41
Specific Plan
Study Area
Would love to see Wheeler Plaza become a green space market…think of the setting of Field Works. It could be used for public gatherings, a Christmas market, and a rotating pop up restaurant/beer garden. Even better to knock down the old Mavericks burger/ Boulanger Building.
10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐40
Specific Plan
Study Area
Lots of ways to beautify our pedestrian area on a budget. See Le Plateau Mont Royal:https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.istockphoto.com% 2Fphotos%2Fmontreal‐
plateau&psig=AOvVaw3rKeh_qdMA82IXQISC8WrS&ust=1673731044821000& source=images&cd=vfe&ved=0CA8QjRxqFwoTCJix8ZS8xfwCFQAAAAAdAAAAABAK 20 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐39
Specific Plan
Study Area
There are so many creative ways to beautify our closed street(s). I am attaching some pics from Montreal that I captured with our downtown in mind! 31 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐24‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Diddams makes plenty off this community. It's not the taxpayers' responsibility.  Diddams needs to step up their game. 11
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐07‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
There are some really intriguing solar paints out right now that lower the temperatures of asphalt. Painting the streetscapes in these paints would be gorgeous and lower the heat index in these areas.  https://www.fastcompany.com/90788163/thanks‐to‐this‐innovative‐ new‐paint‐this‐schools‐playground‐just‐got‐12‐degrees‐cooler 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
There are many benefits to having car‐less spaces. I’d just like to note that it’s also incumbent on us to be thoughtful about how we’ll provide access for those in our community who have difficulty with mobility.
20 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐38
Specific Plan
Study Area
Regular trees and nicer street scape would really make a difference to attracting more pedestrians/patrons to this area 41
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐34‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Totally agree. When I lived in another part of the country, we used to travel to a promenade where it was pedestrian only. It was an experience both for date night and family night! 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐36‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
Burlingame street curbs on the corners are also more wheelchair and stroller friendly, although to be safer three instead of two barrier posts might be more helpful. 10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐29‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
We need more parking for our downtown but it would be nice if it was designed better for visual appeal and greater community usage. 20
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐37
Specific Plan
Study Area
I would love to see all of Laurel closed to traffic from Morse to San Carlos Avenue and turned into a wonderful walking/outdoor cafe/shopping area.  Plenty of parking nearby at Wheeler/Caltrain and the other large public lots.
41 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐36
Specific Plan
Study Area
Whether or not Laurel St is made to be pedestrian only, the sidewalks should be improved aesthetically by using pavers similar to Burlingame Ave. 72 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐35
Specific Plan
Study Area
El Camino businesses need some attention.  There should be a beautification project, incentives or grants to replace signage, awnings, perk up their storefronts.  Planters with no‐ water plants only as dead plants are worse then no plants. 10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐18‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
I like the idea of a mural or a park. I like the idea of the mural ideas being available for comment, too, before a decision is made. 10
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐10‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
I like other surfaces being considered beside asphalt/concrete. Cobblestones with sections of turf. Places to sit on the ground/turf and benches. Plants and trees. 00 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐34
Specific Plan
Study Area
Laurel street in downtown shall become a pedestrian zone. Parking spots and sidewalks shall be removed. Instead permanent outdoor seating for restaurants, sustainable landscaping shall be introduced to entice people to linger, shop, and eat in a relaxed atmosphere. 62 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐33
Specific Plan
Study Area
Id like to see Laureal closed from San Carlos Ave to Bianchinis. However, I hate the unsightly orange blockades. Id love to see those gone and some sort of planters put up. also I do not think the parklets are very appealing. If possible I think it would be good to have a similar, better design for them. Unfortunately, I have noticed rats on Laurel (even when it is not too late in the evening) Can something be done about this? Beautification, parking, cleanliness are important, thank you
22 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area
I agree.  The benefits way outweigh the loss of driving right up to the store.  The point is to enjoy the space, not just to purchase things quickly.  Plus allowing cars creates noise and air pollution when you're walking or eating on the street.
31 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1864
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐32
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
The over‐the‐top access to the seldom‐used Union bank parking lot here is a major detractor. There are multiple entrances to this park lot, and so much infrastructure devoted to a lane to exit onto Laurel is ridiculous.
62 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐24‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area It looks a mess 10
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐31
Specific Plan
Study Area
Love the closed street, but the restaurants have built essentially a new row of tacky buildings. The outdoor seating should be more open to give the street a feeling of an open public area rather than a closed‐in feeling between 2 rows of plywood walls. No walls should be allowed other than low dividers. Imagine lovely tables and chairs with umbrellas open to the street as is common in European plazas.
10 1
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐03‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Yes to murals 00
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐30
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Make the blocked off street permanent. Turn this space into gathering space ‐ similar to what is in front of movie cinemas in Redwood city 12 5
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
We recently had an emergency and needed to move the barriers to pick up an elderly family member. Being able to move the orange barriers was very helpful (thanks to volunteers who came to help!). Whatever barriers are chosen, they need to be moveable for emergencies. 11 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐29
Specific Plan
Study Area
Eliminate the parking at this point and create retail shops or a local park with a central fountain. Such an eye sore right as people enter downtown and breaks up all the shops 61 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐28
Specific Plan
Study Area
This area has a courtyard in front of the retail would be a great place for a fountain or seating 11 1
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐27
Specific Plan
Study Area
Consider custom light posts like downtown Menlo Park all along Laurel to let people know downtown continues and they would keep walking this direction 14 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐26
Specific Plan
Study Area Great spot for public art. Maybe a statue to San Carlos founders or something 5 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐25
Specific Plan
Study Area Close this alley and create a retail space to continue shops instead of breaking the street 8 5 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐24
Specific Plan
Study Area Diddams is looking a bit older these days can the city improve this building. 9 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐23
Specific Plan
Study Area
Close all of Laurel to cars give it back to the people. Create a beautiful street full of greenery and gathering places. Add a bike line 22 6
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐22
Specific Plan
Study Area
El Camino planters are lacking compared to neighboring cities for all of San Carlos. Consider enhancing those downtown to entice travelers to visit our town. 60 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐15‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Great Mural. Love seeing it every‐time i pass by 1 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐21
Specific Plan
Study Area Consider an arched City of San Carlos sign similar to downtown Redwood City 6 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐20
Specific Plan
Study Area
Get rid of the parking in front of Bianchinis and create a space with trees and seating allowing that area to be accessible. 53
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐19
Specific Plan
Study Area
Eliminate this parking lot and create the opportunity to build retail to continue the shops along Laurel to remove the eyesore. Or create the space into a public park with a playground to attract more people to the area.
71 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐18
Specific Plan
Study Area Add a parklet/mural to this alleyway that is an eyesore. To the downtown area. 8 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Exactly. Menlo Park has done this well with painted barriers and plenty of trees and foliage to enhance the scene 20
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐17
Specific Plan
Study Area
Close the 4 Wells Fargo parking spaces and place a parklet here instead. Helping increase walking access to the wheeler garage, reducing constant close calls by pedestrian and cars pulling out. Or infill with a small building to keep the continuous shops of Laurel 80 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1865
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐16
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Love the pedestrian plaza — recommend to make it permanent and update the road grading/surface and barriers to make it feel more intentional and less like a temporary fix. 26 2 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐15
Specific Plan
Study Area
This mural (and the smaller one at mama coco) are great and make the city so vibrant.  As Laurel gets upgraded, please consider more murals on any blank facades 16 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐14
Specific Plan
Study Area
Trees, plants, flowers and greenery adds beauty, creates serenity and adds value to any urban setting.  Tree shade is good too to block the Sun and wind. 71 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐13
Specific Plan
Study Area
It would be nice to have a few restaurants that operate in the middle of the closed, down street. 11 4
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐12
Specific Plan
Study Area
This block is really dark at night. Would love to see some lighting added so it feels nicer to walk at night. 20 1
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
The orange barriers are an eyesore.  This could be a very simple and quick solution.

Yes, this was an exception during covid but this can not continue. The restaurant expansion not only blocking visibility to the neighboring businesses and taking valuable parking away.

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1866
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐02‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
Agreed. The regular cleaning and power washing of downtown has not been happening as often as normal. Often after the farmers market on Sundays there will be fruits/veggies/trash laying in the street.
10 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐06
Specific Plan
Study Area Create a more appeasing streetscape to attract retailers to this side of the Laurel. 24 3 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐05
Specific Plan
Study Area Enhance this intersection to signal entry to San Carlos. 13 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐03‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area Yes, more murals please! 1 0
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01‐
child
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
I agree! If the closure is to become permanent, nicer looking barriers would be great. 3 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐04
Specific Plan
Study Area Murals would be nice 80
Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐02
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
The sidewalks are VERY sticky from dropped and spilled food and drinks. 8 0 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐03
Specific Plan
Study Area Murals on the tall buildings would look great! 14 1 Streetscape
Beautification
Streetscape
Beautification‐01
Specific Plan
Study Area,
Existing Street
Closure
remove the orange barriers and make it a nicer closed street ‐ similar to some of the RWC no car streets. 50 1

9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1867
Mobility
Comment Up Votes Down Votes
Not everything needs a traffic light. Changing one or more of these intersections would really change the feel of driving San Carlos ave. 00 This is one of the most important and poorly used spaces in downtown. It is a difficult and poorly laid out parking area, that is unattractive, and with poor access to the streets or businesses that one would visit while parking here. There should be an inviting pedestrian entrance to Laurel, for examples. Others have made interesting suggestions as well.
00 Can Walnut also be an extension of downtown? What about a one‐way walnut street so that a wide bike lane, and maybe even diagonal parking on Walnut can be included?
00 The timing of these and the Old Country Rd/Holly lights is really bad. This should be improved or something should be done to reduce traffic flow through here. 10 agree, i'd love to see a one‐way loop around the downtown, that includes the alleys for vehicles, so the pedestrian zone for 2 blocks, can stay. 00 Yes, of course the stairs should be repaired and reopened. How long would the city leave them in disrepair if not? Repairing seems like the only reasonable option, and it opens pedestrian access from Cherry street.
00 We need to open up Laurel Street for traffic flow on all the blocks of Laurel.

Best practice while riding in the street is to take the whole lane. No biker enjoys doing this, and it's also inconvenient for drivers.
10 9.k
January 26, 2026 Packet Pg. 1868
A minor crossing is any that does not have a traffic signal. If it's agreed that this is not a minor crossing, there should be a signal here.

While we certainly appreciate the vehicles that yield to people walking, there are plenty of vehicles that do not.

San Carlos City CouncilJanuary 26, 2026

San Carlos City Council
January 26, 2026