Agenda packet — San Jacinto City Council, February 4, 2025 (part 8 of 10)

Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5810
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System
The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 08/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/20/2020
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-794-4977
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data
The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California.

These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials
Date of Government Version: 07/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: California Environmental Protection Agency
Telephone: 916-323-2514
Last EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER)
Non-Case Information sites
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC06287190.2r Page GR-32

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1150 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1388 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER)
Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored
Date of Government Version: 09/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/30/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 866-480-1028
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Varies
PCS: Permit Compliance System
PCS is a computerized management information system that contains data on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit holding facilities. PCS tracks the permit, compliance, and enforcement status of NPDES facilities.

Date of Government Version: 07/14/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2011
Number of Days to Update: 55
Source: EPA, Office of Water
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS INACTIVE: Listing of Inactive PCS Permits
An inactive permit is a facility that has shut down or is no longer discharging.

Date of Government Version: 11/05/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 120
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2496
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PCS ENF: Enforcement data
No description is available for this data
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2015
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/06/2015
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2497
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MINES MRDS: Mineral Resources Data System
Mineral Resources Data System
TC06287190.2r Page GR-33

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1151 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1389 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/21/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/24/2019
Number of Days to Update: 3
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-648-6533
Last EDR Contact: 11/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HWTS: Hazardous Waste Tracking System
DTSC maintains the Hazardous Waste Tracking System that stores ID number information since the early 1980s and manifest data since 1993. The system collects both manifest copies from the generator and destination facility.

Date of Government Version: 10/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 20
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 916-324-2444
Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS
EDR Exclusive Records
EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants
The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners
EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.

TC06287190.2r Page GR-34

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1152 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1390 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A
Date Made Active in Reports: N/A
Number of Days to Update: N/A
Source: EDR, Inc.

Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: N/A
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES
Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives
RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014
Number of Days to Update: 196
Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.

Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California.

Date of Government Version: N/A
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013
Number of Days to Update: 182
Source: State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
Data Release Frequency: Varies

COUNTY RECORDS
ALAMEDA COUNTY:

CS ALAMEDA: Contaminated Sites
A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs).

Date of Government Version: 01/09/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/05/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
UST ALAMEDA: Underground Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 510-567-6700
Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
AMADOR COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-35

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1153 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1391 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA AMADOR: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List
Date of Government Version: 05/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/01/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Amador County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-223-6439
Last EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
BUTTE COUNTY:

CUPA BUTTE: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 106
Source: Public Health Department
Telephone: 530-538-7149
Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
CALVERAS COUNTY:

CUPA CALVERAS: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa Facility Listing
Date of Government Version: 06/17/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/18/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Calveras County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-754-6399
Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
COLUSA COUNTY:

CUPA COLUSA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Health & Human Services
Telephone: 530-458-0396
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY:

SL CONTRA COSTA: Site List
List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs.

Date of Government Version: 07/16/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department
Telephone: 925-646-2286
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
DEL NORTE COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-36

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1154 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1392 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA DEL NORTE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Date of Government Version: 06/08/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 707-465-0426
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
EL DORADO COUNTY:

CUPA EL DORADO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
FRESNO COUNTY:

CUPA FRESNO: CUPA Resources List
Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Dept. of Community Health
Telephone: 559-445-3271
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
GLENN COUNTY:

CUPA GLENN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District
Telephone: 830-934-6500
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HUMBOLDT COUNTY:

CUPA HUMBOLDT: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 08/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
IMPERIAL COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-37

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1155 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1393 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA IMPERIAL: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 07/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: San Diego Border Field Office
Telephone: 760-339-2777
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
INYO COUNTY:

CUPA INYO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list.

Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 760-878-0238
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
KERN COUNTY:

CUPA KERN: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the Kern County Hazardous Material Business Plan.

Date of Government Version: 07/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Kern County Public Health
Telephone: 661-321-3000
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST KERN: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing.

Date of Government Version: 07/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
KINGS COUNTY:

CUPA KINGS: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 05/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Kings County Department of Public Health
Telephone: 559-584-1411
Last EDR Contact: 11/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LAKE COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-38

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1156 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1394 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA LAKE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 08/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 71
Source: Lake County Environmental Health
Telephone: 707-263-1164
Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LASSEN COUNTY:

CUPA LASSEN: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Lassen County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-251-8528
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES COUNTY:

AOCONCERN: Key Areas of Concerns in Los Angeles County
San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 3/30/2009 Exide Site area is a cleanup plan of lead-impacted soil surrounding the former Exide Facility as designated by the DTSC. Date of Government Version: 7/17/2017 Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009
Number of Days to Update: 206
Source: N/A
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
HMS LOS ANGELES: HMS: Street Number List
Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites.

Date of Government Version: 07/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/10/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-3517
Last EDR Contact: 10/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
LF LOS ANGELES: List of Solid Waste Facilities
Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County.

Date of Government Version: 07/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/13/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: La County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 818-458-5185
Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LF LOS ANGELES CITY: City of Los Angeles Landfills
Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/17/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/05/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Engineering & Construction Division
Telephone: 213-473-7869
Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TC06287190.2r Page GR-39

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1157 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1395 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) LOS ANGELES AST: Active & Inactive AST Inventory
A listing of active & inactive above ground petroleum storage tank site locations, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 06/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/25/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/22/2019
Number of Days to Update: 58
Source: Los Angeles Fire Department
Telephone: 213-978-3800
Last EDR Contact: 09/25/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LOS ANGELES CO LF METHANE: Methane Producing Landfills
This data was created on April 30, 2012 to represent known disposal sites in Los Angeles County that may produce and emanate methane gas. The shapefile contains disposal sites within Los Angeles County that once accepted degradable refuse material. Information used to create this data was extracted from a landfill survey performed by County Engineers (Major Waste System Map, 1973) as well as historical records from CalRecycle, Regional Water Quality Control Board, and Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Date of Government Version: 04/30/2012
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019
Number of Days to Update: 42
Source: Los Angeles County Department of Public Works
Telephone: 626-458-6973
Last EDR Contact: 10/12/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LOS ANGELES HM: Active & Inactive Hazardous Materials Inventory A listing of active & inactive hazardous materials facility locations, located in the City of Los Angeles.

Date of Government Version: 03/25/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/14/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/01/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Community Health Services
Telephone: 323-890-7806
Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
UST EL SEGUNDO: City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city.

Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department
Telephone: 310-524-2236
Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
TC06287190.2r Page GR-40

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1158 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1396 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) UST LONG BEACH: City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach.

Date of Government Version: 04/22/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/27/2019
Number of Days to Update: 65
Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department
Telephone: 562-570-2563
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
UST TORRANCE: City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance.

Date of Government Version: 06/27/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/02/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: City of Torrance Fire Department
Telephone: 310-618-2973
Last EDR Contact: 10/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MADERA COUNTY:

CUPA MADERA: CUPA Facility List
A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Madera County Environmental Health
Telephone: 559-675-7823
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MARIN COUNTY:

UST MARIN: Underground Storage Tank Sites
Currently permitted USTs in Marin County.

Date of Government Version: 09/26/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2018
Number of Days to Update: 29
Source: Public Works Department Waste Management
Telephone: 415-473-6647
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
MERCED COUNTY:

CUPA MERCED: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 07/28/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Merced County Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-381-1094
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONO COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-41

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1159 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1397 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA MONO: CUPA Facility List
CUPA Facility List
Date of Government Version: 08/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/24/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Mono County Health Department
Telephone: 760-932-5580
Last EDR Contact: 11/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/3021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
MONTEREY COUNTY:

CUPA MONTEREY: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division.

Date of Government Version: 07/13/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2020
Number of Days to Update: 16
Source: Monterey County Health Department
Telephone: 831-796-1297
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
NAPA COUNTY:

LUST NAPA: Sites With Reported Contamination
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.

Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017
Number of Days to Update: 50
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST NAPA: Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county.

Date of Government Version: 09/05/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/31/2019
Number of Days to Update: 52
Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NEVADA COUNTY:

CUPA NEVADA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility list.

Date of Government Version: 07/29/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/30/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Community Development Agency
Telephone: 530-265-1467
Last EDR Contact: 10/20/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
ORANGE COUNTY:

IND_SITE ORANGE: List of Industrial Site Cleanups
Petroleum and non-petroleum spills.

TC06287190.2r Page GR-42

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1160 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1398 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Date of Government Version: 06/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups
Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 07/02/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 11/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST ORANGE: List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST).

Date of Government Version: 07/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/19/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Health Care Agency
Telephone: 714-834-3446
Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PLACER COUNTY:

MS PLACER: Master List of Facilities
List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites.

Date of Government Version: 11/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 1
Source: Placer County Health and Human Services
Telephone: 530-745-2363
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
PLUMAS COUNTY:

CUPA PLUMAS: CUPA Facility List
Plumas County CUPA Program facilities.

Date of Government Version: 03/31/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/26/2019
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: Plumas County Environmental Health
Telephone: 530-283-6355
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
RIVERSIDE COUNTY:

LUST RIVERSIDE: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 10/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 09/15/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
TC06287190.2r Page GR-43

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1161 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1399 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) UST RIVERSIDE: Underground Storage Tank Tank List
Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county.

Date of Government Version: 10/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2020
Number of Days to Update: 27
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 951-358-5055
Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SACRAMENTO COUNTY:

CS SACRAMENTO: Toxic Site Clean-Up List
List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred.

Date of Government Version: 02/18/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
ML SACRAMENTO: Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators.

Date of Government Version: 02/24/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management
Telephone: 916-875-8406
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN BENITO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN BENITO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 08/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: San Benito County Environmental Health
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY:

PERMITS SAN BERNARDINO: Hazardous Material Permits
This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers.

Date of Government Version: 08/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN DIEGO COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-44

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1162 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1400 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) HMMD SAN DIEGO: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.)
Date of Government Version: 08/31/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/31/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/23/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division
Telephone: 619-338-2268
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF SAN DIEGO: Solid Waste Facilities
San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities.

Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018
Number of Days to Update: 56
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 619-338-2209
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN DIEGO CO LOP: Local Oversight Program Listing
A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases.

Date of Government Version: 07/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 858-505-6874
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN DIEGO CO SAM: Environmental Case Listing
The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program.

Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010
Number of Days to Update: 24
Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA Facility Listing
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 08/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SAN FRANCISCO: Local Oversite Facilities
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.

TC06287190.2r Page GR-45

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1163 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1401 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008
Number of Days to Update: 10
Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
UST SAN FRANCISCO: Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county.

Date of Government Version: 08/03/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 82
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 415-252-3920
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY:

UST SAN JOAQUIN: San Joaquin Co. UST
A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county.

Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018
Number of Days to Update: 15
Source: Environmental Health Department
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/10/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/28/2020
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY:

CUPA SAN LUIS OBISPO: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.

Date of Government Version: 07/27/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SAN MATEO COUNTY:

BI SAN MATEO: Business Inventory
List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks.

Date of Government Version: 02/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2020
Number of Days to Update: 64
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 09/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
LUST SAN MATEO: Fuel Leak List
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county.

Date of Government Version: 03/29/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2019
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921
Last EDR Contact: 12/01/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-46

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1164 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1402 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA SANTA BARBARA: CUPA Facility Listing
CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division.

Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011
Number of Days to Update: 28
Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department
Telephone: 805-686-8167
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SANTA CLARA COUNTY:

CUPA SANTA CLARA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 08/20/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2020
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-1973
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county.

Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health.

Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005
Number of Days to Update: 22
Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District
Telephone: 408-265-2600
Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST SANTA CLARA: LOP Listing
A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county.

Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014
Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Environmental Health
Telephone: 408-918-3417
Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
SAN JOSE HAZMAT: Hazardous Material Facilities
Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites.

Date of Government Version: 07/30/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/31/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/16/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: City of San Jose Fire Department
Telephone: 408-535-7694
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY:

CUPA SANTA CRUZ: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing.

Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017
Number of Days to Update: 90
Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health
Telephone: 831-464-2761
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SHASTA COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-47

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1165 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1403 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA SHASTA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa Facility List.

Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017
Number of Days to Update: 51
Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SOLANO COUNTY:

LUST SOLANO: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.

Date of Government Version: 06/04/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2019
Number of Days to Update: 68
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2019
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST SOLANO: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county.

Date of Government Version: 08/25/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/16/2020
Number of Days to Update: 21
Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
SONOMA COUNTY:

CUPA SONOMA: Cupa Facility List
Cupa Facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/07/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2020
Number of Days to Update: 79
Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174
Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
LUST SONOMA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites
A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county.

Date of Government Version: 07/01/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/02/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Department of Health Services
Telephone: 707-565-6565
Last EDR Contact: 09/16/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/04/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
STANISLAUS COUNTY:

CUPA STANISLAUS: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 02/04/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/05/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 70
Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751
Last EDR Contact: 10/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
SUTTER COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-48

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1166 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1404 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) UST SUTTER: Underground Storage Tanks
Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county.

Date of Government Version: 08/25/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/26/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2020
Number of Days to Update: 83
Source: Sutter County Environmental Health Services
Telephone: 530-822-7500
Last EDR Contact: 11/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
TEHAMA COUNTY:

CUPA TEHAMA: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facilities
Date of Government Version: 08/11/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/12/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TRINITY COUNTY:

CUPA TRINITY: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 07/14/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/16/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2020
Number of Days to Update: 75
Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control
Telephone: 760-352-0381
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TULARE COUNTY:

CUPA TULARE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa program facilities
Date of Government Version: 08/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 81
Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400
Last EDR Contact: 10/28/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/15/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
TUOLUMNE COUNTY:

CUPA TUOLUMNE: CUPA Facility List
Cupa facility list
Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018
Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018
Number of Days to Update: 61
Source: Divison of Environmental Health
Telephone: 209-533-5633
Last EDR Contact: 10/13/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies
VENTURA COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-49

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1167 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1405 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) BWT VENTURA: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information.

Date of Government Version: 07/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/08/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
LF VENTURA: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites.

Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011
Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012
Number of Days to Update: 49
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 09/23/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
LUST VENTURA: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST).

Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008
Number of Days to Update: 37
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
MED WASTE VENTURA: Medical Waste Program List
To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County.

Date of Government Version: 07/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2020
Number of Days to Update: 77
Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 10/19/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
UST VENTURA: Underground Tank Closed Sites List
Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List.

Date of Government Version: 08/26/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/01/2020
Number of Days to Update: 84
Source: Environmental Health Division
Telephone: 805-654-2813
Last EDR Contact: 09/08/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
YOLO COUNTY:

UST YOLO: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county.

Date of Government Version: 06/23/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/29/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/15/2020
Number of Days to Update: 78
Source: Yolo County Department of Health
Telephone: 530-666-8646
Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/11/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
YUBA COUNTY:

TC06287190.2r Page GR-50

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1168 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1406 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) CUPA YUBA: CUPA Facility List
CUPA facility listing for Yuba County.

Date of Government Version: 08/06/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 10/26/2020
Number of Days to Update: 80
Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department
Telephone: 530-749-7523
Last EDR Contact: 11/03/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Varies

OTHER DATABASE(S)
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.

CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility.

Date of Government Version: 08/10/2020
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 11/02/2020
Number of Days to Update: 13
Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375
Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/22/2021
Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned
NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 05/16/2019
Number of Days to Update: 36
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 10/09/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/18/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data
Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility.

Date of Government Version: 01/01/2019
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2020
Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2020
Number of Days to Update: 72
Source: Department of Environmental Conservation
Telephone: 518-402-8651
Last EDR Contact: 10/30/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/08/2021
Data Release Frequency: Quarterly
PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 06/30/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 53
Source: Department of Environmental Protection
Telephone: 717-783-8990
Last EDR Contact: 10/07/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/25/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
RI MANIFEST: Manifest information
Hazardous waste manifest information
Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/02/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 12/10/2019
Number of Days to Update: 69
Source: Department of Environmental Management
Telephone: 401-222-2797
Last EDR Contact: 11/11/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/01/2021
Data Release Frequency: Annually
TC06287190.2r Page GR-51

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1169 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1407 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information
Hazardous waste manifest information.

Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018
Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2019
Date Made Active in Reports: 09/03/2019
Number of Days to Update: 76
Source: Department of Natural Resources
Telephone: N/A
Last EDR Contact: 09/02/2020
Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/21/2020
Data Release Frequency: Annually
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Source: Endeavor Business Media
Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.

Electric Power Transmission Line Data
Source: Endeavor Business Media
This map includes information copyrighted by Endeavor Business Media. This information is provided on a best effort basis and Endeavor Business Media does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of Endeavor Business Media.

Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.

AHA Hospitals:

Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.

Telephone: 312-280-5991
The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.

Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Telephone: 410-786-3000
A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Nursing Homes
Source: National Institutes of Health
Telephone: 301-594-6248
Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.

Public Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states.

Private Schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
Telephone: 202-502-7300
The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.

Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities
Source: Department of Social Services
Telephone: 916-657-4041
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
TC06287190.2r Page GR-52

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1170 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1408 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411
Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey

STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION
© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC06287190.2r Page GR-53

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1171 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1409 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-1
geologic strata.
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics

2. Groundwater flow velocity.

1. Groundwater flow direction, and
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.

EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in Version Date: 2012
West Map: 5640936 LAKEVIEW, CA
Version Date: 2012
Target Property Map: 5641216 SAN JACINTO, CA

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
Elevation: 1489 ft. above sea level
UTM Y (Meters): 3740425.8
UTM X (Meters): 500473.7
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 11
Longitude (West): 116.994882 - 116˚ 59’ 41.58’’
Latitude (North): 33.805762 - 33˚ 48’ 20.74’’

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
SAN JACINTO, CA 92582
38465 DE ANZA DR

MCLEISH RANCH

TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1172 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1410 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-2
should be field verified.
on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft) Elevation (ft) TP
TP
0 1/2 1 Miles ✩Target Property Elevation: 1489 ft.

North South
West East 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1503 1507 1510 1489 1493 1478 1480 1481 1483 1485 1470 1474 1475 1476 1478 1479 1479 1478 1478 1478 1484 1484 1486 1489 1492 1495 1497 1499 1500 1503 1506 1509 1512 General Topographic Gradient: General NNW

TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1173 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1411 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-3
Not Reported

LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION

MAP ID FROM TP GROUNDWATER FLOW
hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW®
Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.

Status: Not found
Search Radius: 1.25 miles
Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*:
* ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
SAN JACINTO YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map

NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Electronic
NWI Quad at Target Property Data Coverage
06065C1470G FEMA FIRM Flood data
06065C1480G FEMA FIRM Flood data
06065C1460H FEMA FIRM Flood data
Additional Panels in search area: FEMA Source Type
06065C1490G FEMA FIRM Flood data
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type

FEMA FLOOD ZONE
and bodies of water).

Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1174 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1412 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-4
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era: Cenozoic Category: Continental Deposits
System: Tertiary
Series: Pliocene
Code: Tpc (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.

Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional

GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1175 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1413 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) EDR Inc.
5 4
10 3
6 2
1 9
3 8
6 7
0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1176 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1414 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-6
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: loamy fine sand
Soil Component Name: TRAVER
Soil Map ID: 2

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 35 inches 59 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 35 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Soil Component Name: GRANGEVILLE
Soil Map ID: 1
in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil

DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1177 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1415 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-7
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: loamy fine sand
Soil Component Name: DELLO
Soil Map ID: 3
Min: 8.4
Max: 9.6
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granular
silty clay loam
sandy loam to
3 38 inches 59 inches stratified fine
Min: 8.4
Max: 9.6
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
2 12 inches 38 inches fine sandy loam Granular
Min: 8.4
Max: 9.6
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
1 0 inches 12 inches loamy fine sand Granular
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1178 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1416 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-8
Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: sandy loam
Soil Component Name: GRANGEVILLE
Soil Map ID: 4
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 42
Max: 141
Well-graded sand.

Clean Sands,
SOILS, Sands,

COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
Granular
sand
3 35 inches 59 inches gravelly coarse
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 42
Max: 141
Well-graded sand.

Clean Sands,
SOILS, Sands,

COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
2 7 inches 35 inches sand Granular
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 42
Max: 141
Well-graded sand.

Clean Sands,
SOILS, Sands,

COARSE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
1 0 inches 7 inches loamy fine sand Granular
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1179 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1417 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-9

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 16 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Soil Component Name: GRANGEVILLE
Soil Map ID: 5

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 16 inches 59 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 16 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1180 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1418 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-10
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
2 16 inches 59 inches sandy loam Granular
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
and Sand.

Clayey Gravel
200), Silty, or
passing No.
pct. or less
materials (35
1 0 inches 16 inches loamy fine sand Granular
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: loamy fine sand
Soil Component Name: GRANGEVILLE
Soil Map ID: 6

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 16 inches 59 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1181 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1419 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-11
Min: 8.4
Max: 9.6
Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 20 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Soil Component Name: TRAVER
Soil Map ID: 8
No Layer Information available.

Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Not Reported
Hydric Status: Not hydric
Soil Drainage Class:
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: loamy fine sand
Soil Component Name: Water
Soil Map ID: 7
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1182 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1420 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-12
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 35 inches 59 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay
Min: 6.6
Max: 8.4
Min: 14
Max: 42
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
Silt-Clay
silty clay loam
sandy loam to
2 20 inches 59 inches stratified fine
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1183 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1421 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-13
opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
2 16 inches 59 inches sandy loam Silt-Clay

7.4 Max: 9 Min:

Min: 4
Max: 14
50%), silt.
limit less than
Clays (liquid
SOILS, Silts and

FINE-GRAINED
Soils.
200), Silty
passing No.
than 35 pct.

Materials (more
1 0 inches 16 inches fine sandy loam Silt-Clay
Soil Layer Information
Boundary Classification Saturated
hydraulic
conductivity
micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) Depth to Watertable Min: > 0 inches
Depth to Bedrock Min: > 0 inches
Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: High
Hydric Status: Partially hydric
Soil Drainage Class: Poorly drained
textures.
moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Hydrologic Group: Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep, Soil Surface Texture: fine sandy loam
Soil Component Name: GRANGEVILLE
Soil Map ID: 10
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1184 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1422 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-14
24 CADWR8000005559 1/2 - 1 Mile SW
23 CADWR0000009017 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW
22 CADWR8000005674 1/2 - 1 Mile NE
C21 CAUSGSN00012193 1/2 - 1 Mile SE
19 CADWR8000005618 1/2 - 1 Mile West
B18 CAUSGSN00005251 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE
16 CADWR0000027823 1/2 - 1 Mile NE
15 CADWR8000005636 1/2 - 1 Mile WNW
14 CADWR0000024923 1/2 - 1 Mile East
A13 CAUSGSN00009430 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE
A11 CADWR8000005575 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE
10 CADWR0000025057 1/2 - 1 Mile West
8 CADWR0000008373 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESE
7 CADWR8000005619 1/4 - 1/2 Mile East
6 CADWR8000005657 1/4 - 1/2 Mile North
5 CADWR0000034167 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNE
4 CADWR8000005638 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NW
3 CADWR8000005635 1/8 - 1/4 Mile NW
2 CADWR0000033080 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SE
1 CADWR8000005609 0 - 1/8 Mile South

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.

No PWS System Found

FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
C20 USGS40000138263 1/2 - 1 Mile SE
B17 USGS40000138298 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE
A12 USGS40000138257 1/2 - 1 Mile SSE
9 USGS40000138356 1/2 - 1 Mile ENE

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION

LOCATION

MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP
State Database 1.000
Federal FRDS PWS Nearest PWS within 1 mile
Federal USGS 1.000

WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1185 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1423 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) EDR Inc.
1 4 8 0 1 4 8 0
1 4 8 0
1 4 8 0
1 5 2 0
1 5 2 0
1 5 2 0
1 5
20 1
5 20
1 8
1 8
0 0
1 7
6 0
17 1
7 20
1 6
0 0
1 6
8 0
CA

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1186 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1424 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-16
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=04S01W21F001S&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_ Other Name: 04S01W21F001S GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: Department of Water Resources
Well ID: 04S01W21F001S Well Type: UNK
5 NNE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR0000034167
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 402
Well Name: EMWD10242 Well Use: Irrigation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48158
4 NW
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR8000005638
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 401
Well Name: EMWD14491 Well Use: Irrigation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48159
3 NW
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR8000005635
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=04S01W21P003S&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_ Other Name: 04S01W21P003S GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: Department of Water Resources
Well ID: 04S01W21P003S Well Type: UNK
2 SE
1/8 - 1/4 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR0000033080
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 1220
Well Name: EMWD10255 Well Use: Observation
State Well #: 04S01W21N002S Station ID: 46608
1 South
0 - 1/8 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR8000005609
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1187 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1425 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-17
Well Hole Depth Units: Not Reported
Well Depth Units: Not Reported Well Hole Depth: Not Reported Construction Date: Not Reported Well Depth: Not Reported Formation Type: Not Reported Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: California Coastal Basin aquifers
Contrib Drainage Area: Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported Drainage Area: Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported Description: Not Reported HUC: 18070202
Monitor Location: 004S001W21K001S Type: Well
Organization Name: USGS California Water Science Center Organization ID: USGS-CA
9 ENE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
FED USGS USGS40000138356
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=04S01W21Q001S&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_ Other Name: 04S01W21Q001S GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: Department of Water Resources
Well ID: 04S01W21Q001S Well Type: UNK
8 ESE
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR0000008373
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 792
Well Name: EMWD10260 Well Use: Irrigation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48165
7 East
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR8000005619
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 247
Well Name: EMWD13502 Well Use: Irrigation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48164
6 North
1/4 - 1/2 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR8000005657
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1188 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1426 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-18
Other Name: USGS-334751116591701 GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: United States Geological Survey
Well ID: USGS-334751116591701 Well Type: UNK
A13
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CAUSGSN00009430
Feet to sea level: Not Reported Note: Not Reported
Level reading date: 1991-06-27 Feet below surface: 180
Note: Not Reported
Feet below surface: 80.40 Feet to sea level: Not Reported Ground water levels,Number of Measurements: 2 Level reading date: 1992-02-21 Well Hole Depth Units: Not Reported
Well Depth Units: ft Well Hole Depth: Not Reported
Construction Date: Not Reported Well Depth: 460
Formation Type: Not Reported Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: California Coastal Basin aquifers
Contrib Drainage Area: Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported Drainage Area: Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported Description: Not Reported HUC: 18070202
Monitor Location: 004S001W28G001S Type: Well
Organization Name: USGS California Water Science Center Organization ID: USGS-CA
A12
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
FED USGS USGS40000138257
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Unknown Well Depth: 0
Well Name: Not Reported Well Use: Unknown
State Well #: 04S01W28G001S Station ID: 6391
A11
SSE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR8000005575
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=04S01W20K001S&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_ Other Name: 04S01W20K001S GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: Department of Water Resources
Well ID: 04S01W20K001S Well Type: UNK
10 West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR0000025057
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1189 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1427 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-19
Well Hole Depth Units: Not Reported
Well Depth Units: ft Well Hole Depth: Not Reported
Construction Date: Not Reported Well Depth: 100
Formation Type: Not Reported Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: California Coastal Basin aquifers
Contrib Drainage Area: Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported Drainage Area: Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported Description: Not Reported HUC: 18070202
Monitor Location: 004S001W21R001S Type: Well
Organization Name: USGS California Water Science Center Organization ID: USGS-CA
B17
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
FED USGS USGS40000138298
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=04S01W21B001S&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_ Other Name: 04S01W21B001S GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: Department of Water Resources
Well ID: 04S01W21B001S Well Type: UNK
16 NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR0000027823
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 824
Well Name: EMWD10243 Well Use: Observation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48161
15 WNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR8000005636
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=04S01W21R001S&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_ Other Name: 04S01W21R001S GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: Department of Water Resources
Well ID: 04S01W21R001S Well Type: UNK
14 East
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR0000024923
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
amp_date=&global_id=&assigned_name=USGS-334751116591701&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=USGSNEW&s GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1190 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1428 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-20
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
amp_date=&global_id=&assigned_name=USGS-334753116585501&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=USGSNEW&s Other Name: USGS-334753116585501 GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: United States Geological Survey
Well ID: USGS-334753116585501 Well Type: UNK
C21
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CAUSGSN00012193
Well Hole Depth Units: Not Reported
Well Depth Units: ft Well Hole Depth: Not Reported
Construction Date: Not Reported Well Depth: 47
Formation Type: Not Reported Aquifer Type: Not Reported Aquifer: California Coastal Basin aquifers
Contrib Drainage Area: Not Reported Contrib Drainage Area Unts: Not Reported Drainage Area: Not Reported Drainage Area Units: Not Reported Description: Not Reported HUC: 18070202
Monitor Location: 004S001W28H001S Type: Well
Organization Name: USGS California Water Science Center Organization ID: USGS-CA
C20
SE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
FED USGS USGS40000138263
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 442
Well Name: EMWD12161 Well Use: Observation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48162
19 West
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR8000005618
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
amp_date=&global_id=&assigned_name=USGS-334807116585101&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=USGSNEW&s Other Name: USGS-334807116585101 GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: United States Geological Survey
Well ID: USGS-334807116585101 Well Type: UNK
B18
ESE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CAUSGSN00005251
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1191 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1429 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-21
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 311
Well Name: EMWD10310 Well Use: Observation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48173
24 SW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR8000005559
GeoTracker Data: Not Reported
date=&global_id=&assigned_name=04S01W17R002S&store_num= Groundwater Quality Data: https://gamagroundwater.waterboards.ca.gov/gama/gamamap/public/GamaDataDisplay.asp?dataset=DWR&samp_ Other Name: 04S01W17R002S GAMA PFAS Testing: Not Reported Source: Department of Water Resources
Well ID: 04S01W17R002S Well Type: UNK
23 NNW
1/2 - 1 Mile
Lower
CA WELLS CADWR0000009017
Basin Name: San Jacinto Well Completion Rpt #: Not Reported Well Type: Single Well Well Depth: 451
Well Name: EMWD10247 Well Use: Irrigation
State Well #: Not Reported Station ID: 48163
22 NE
1/2 - 1 Mile
Higher
CA WELLS CADWR8000005674
Map ID
Direction
Distance
Elevation Database EDR ID Number
GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS ®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1192 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1430 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TC06287190.2r Page A-22
Basement 1.700 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 2nd Floor 0.450 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Living Area - 1st Floor 0.117 pCi/L 100% 0% 0%
Area Average Activity % <4 pCi/L % 4-20 pCi/L % >20 pCi/L Number of sites tested: 12
Federal Area Radon Information for RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L.
: Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L.

Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.

Federal EPA Radon Zone for RIVERSIDE County: 2
92582 9 2
______ ________ ________
Zipcode Num Tests > 4 pCi/L
Radon Test Results
State Database: CA Radon

AREA RADON INFORMATION

GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS
RADON
®

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1193 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1431 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)
Source: United States Geologic Survey
EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection.

Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map
Source: U.S. Geological Survey

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL.

Source: FEMA
Telephone: 877-336-2627
Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory
Source: Department of Fish and Wildlife
Telephone: 916-445-0411

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOW Information System R
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information.

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.

SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database
Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559
SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management.

TC06287190.2r Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1194 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1432 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

FEDERAL WATER WELLS
PWS: Public Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.

PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water
Telephone: 202-564-3750
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).

USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION
Groundwater Ambient Monitoring & Assessment Program
State Water Resources Control Board
Telephone: 916-341-5577
The GAMA Program is Californias comprehensive groundwater quality monitoring program. GAMA collects data by testing the untreated, raw water in different types of wells for naturally-occurring and man-made chemicals. The GAMA data includes Domestic, Monitoring and Municipal well types from the following sources, Department of Water Resources, Department of Heath Services, EDF, Agricultural Lands, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Department of Pesticide Regulation, United States Geological Survey, Groundwater Ambient Monitoring and Assessment Program and Local Groundwater Projects.

Water Well Database
Source: Department of Water Resources
Telephone: 916-651-9648
California Drinking Water Quality Database
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-324-2319
The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information.

California Oil and Gas Well Locations
Source: Dept of Conservation, Geologic Energy Management Division Telephone: 916-323-1779
Oil and Gas well locations in the state.

California Earthquake Fault Lines
Source: California Division of Mines and Geology
The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.

RADON
State Database: CA Radon
Source: Department of Public Health
Telephone: 916-210-8558
Radon Database for California
TC06287190.2r Page PSGR-2

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1195 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1433 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Area Radon Information
Source: USGS
Telephone: 703-356-4020
The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.

The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions.

EPA Radon Zones
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-356-4020
Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels.

OTHER
Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology.

TC06287190.2r Page PSGR-3

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1196 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1434 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8229 McLeish Ranch, San Jacinto, California

APPENDIX F

OTHER DOCUMENTS

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1197 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1435 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 12/18/2020 GeoTracker
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=n+lyon+avenue+san+jacinto+ca 1/1 Map data ©2020 Imagery ©2020 , County of San Bernardino, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Sur 200 m vey, USDA Farm Ser Report a map err vice Agency or n lyon avenue san jacinto ca
Map Address

GEOTRACKER
Sites and Facilities - INFO
Cleanup Sites
LUST Cleanup Sites
Cleanup Program Sites
Military Cleanup Sites
Military Cleanup Sites
Military Privatized Sites
Military UST Sites
DTSC Cleanup Sites
Permitted Facilities
Waste Discharge Requirements
(WDR) Sites
Permitted USTs - INFO
DTSC Hazardous Waste Sites
Land Disposal Sites
Irrigated Lands Regulatory
Program Sites
Oil / Gas Sites
Conned Animal Sites
Other Sites
Project Sites
Non-Case Information Sites
Sampling Points - Public
Field Points
AGLand Domestic Wells

SIGNIFIES A CLOSED SITE
Tools
Map Coverages

TAKE A TOUR VIEW ON GAMA

SITES CURRENTLY VISIBLE ON MAP

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1198 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1436 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 12/18/2020 MyProperty
https://enviro.epa.gov/enviro/myproperty.certificate?p_addr=436-080-001, 436-080-002, and 436-080-006&p_city=San Jacinto&p_state=CA&p_ID=dfk… 1/1 U.S. Environmental Protecon Agency
MyProperty
Environmental Databases Search
The search of EPA's Facility Registry System did not locate any records for the search criteria provided below:

Search Criteria:

Street Address:
436-080-001, 436-080-002, and 436-
080-006
City, State: San Jacinto, CA
Query executed
on:
12/18/2020 02:02 PM EST
Contact the appropriate state, tribal or local agencies if you seek additional information.

Disclaimer
The MyProperty reports are provided solely for informaonal purposes. They do not provide legal advice, have legally binding effect, or expressly or implicitly create, expand, or limit any legal rights, obligaons, responsibilies, expectaons, or benefits in regard to any person. EPA maintains the applicaon to enhance public access to environmental informaon.

This service has connual data updates, and we will correct errors brought to our aenon, as appropriate.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1199 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1437 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Your Property. Our Priority.
1745 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 110, Orange, CA 92868
Telephone (714) 634-9500 Fax: (714) 634-9507
www.HillmannConsulting.com
December 17, 2020
State of California
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Region 4 – Cypress Regional Office
5796 Corporate Avenue
Cypress, CA 90630-4732
Phone (714) 484-5337
Fax (714) 484-5318
[email protected]
RE: DTSC Files:

No address assigned, vacant land
APNs: McLeish Ranch; 436-080-001, 436-080-002, and 436-080-006 San Jacinto, CA 92581
Dear Sir/Madam:

Hillmann Consulting, LLC is conducting an environmental investigation of the above referenced property. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we are requesting any information your office has regarding this property. If any records are located, we would like to obtain copies or schedule a file review. If no records are available, please contact me to confirm. Thank you.

Sincerely,
Gabriela Cyrulik
Environmental Technician
Hillmann Consulting, LLC
[email protected]

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1200 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1438 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Your Property. Our Priority.
1745 W. Orangewood Avenue, Suite 110, Orange, CA 92868
Telephone (714) 634-9500 Fax: (714) 634-9507
www.HillmannConsulting.com
December 17, 2020
State of California
Regional Water Quality Control Board – Santa Ana Region (8) 3737 Main Street, Suite #500
Riverside, CA 92501-3339
Phone (951) 782-4130
Fax (951) 781-6288
[email protected]
RE: Environmental Files:

No address assigned, vacant land
APNs: McLeish Ranch; 436-080-001, 436-080-002, and 436-080-006 San Jacinto, CA 92581
Dear RWQCB:

Sincerely,
Gabriela Cyrulik
Environmental Technician
Hillmann Consulting, LLC
[email protected]

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1201 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1439 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) EPO-111 (REV 08/16)

REQUEST FOR RECORDS
Land Use & Water Resources
PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 6254 (F). RECORDS OF PENDING INVESTIGATION AND INFORMANTS NAMES, ADDRESSES AND TELEPHONE NUMBERS WILL NOT BE RELEASED.

REQUESTS WILL BE PROCESSED WITHIN TEN (10) BUSINESS DAYS PER CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, SECTION 6256.

Send completed form to one of the addresses or faxes below:

Western Riverside County Eastern Riverside County
3880 Lemon Street, Suite 200
Riverside, California, 92501
Phone: (951) 955-8980
Fax: (951) 955-8988
Email: [email protected]
47-950 Arabia St., Suite A
Indio, CA 92201
Phone: (760) 863-7570
Fax: (760) 863-7013
YOUR NAME: DATE:

MAILING ADDRESS: PHONE: ( )
CITY: STATE: ZIP:

EMAIL ADDRESS:

INFORMATION REQUESTED:

SITE ADDRESS: APN: - -
CITY: ZIP:

THIS FORM IS FOR ACQUISITION OF ANY EXISTING RECORDS. ANY CONSULTATION IN

REFERENCE TO THESE RECORDS MAY BE SUBJECT TO A CONSULTATION FEE (PURSUANT TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDINANCE 640)
Signature Date
Cash and/or credit cards are the only accepted form of payment for records requests.

PROCESSING AND REPRODUCTION FEES FOR RECORDS RESEARCHED MUST BE PAID UPON RECEIPT OF RECORDS AS FOLLOWS:

EACH PAGE @ $ 0.10 TOTAL NO. OF PAGES: = $
TOTAL:

REVIEWED BY TITLE

RECORDS RECEIVED BY DATE

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1202 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1440 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) John Snyder

AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER/
SEALER OF WEIGHTS & MEASURES Riverside County
Agricultural Commissioner’s Office
4080 Lemon Street, Room 19, PO Box 1089,
Riverside, CA 92502-1089
Phone: (951) 955-3045 FAX (951) 955-3047
http://www.rivcoag.org

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
A. REQUESTOR: DATE:

COMPANY: PHONE NUMBER (DAYTIME):

MAILING ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: ZIP CODE:

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

B. I request the following recordsfrom t
[ ] WEIGHTS & MEASURES
[ ] Other Program - Please Specify:

Please describe desired records in detail:
he Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner’s Office pertaining to:
[ ] PESTICIDE REGULATION [ ] PEST EXCLUSION/NURSERY
(Attach Additional Sheet If Required)
C. I request these records in the following format:
[ ] Review records in person No Fee
[ ] Fax records (existing format) No Fee
[ ] E-Mail records (existing format) No Fee
[ ] Copies $.50 per page for first copy; $.50 per copy for subsequent copies of same page (8½” x 11” size paper) [ ] Data compilation, extraction, programming, reformatting $ per hour Signature of Requestor:

Please complete all boxes A - C Thank-you
(rev. 04/03/2013)
Gabriela Cyrulik

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1203 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1441 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1204 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1442 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1205 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1443 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Hillmann Consulting LLC
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Hillmann Project No.: C3-8229 McLeish Ranch, San Jacinto, California

APPENDIX G

PROJECT PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1206 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1444 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

Ms. Cyrulik is an Environmental Technician for our Southern California Office. Ms. Cyrulik has supervised work practices and controls in accordance with job specifications, current EPA, OSHA, and state regulations for asbestos abatement projects in schools, as well as commercial, industrial, public, and multi-family residential buildings.

As an Environmental Technician, Ms. Cyrulik performs quality assurance air sampling for asbestos, lead, and mold abatement projects. She is also responsible for performing air and surface hazard materials testing, and potable and non-potable water sampling. She regularly performs Indoor Air Quality Assessments as well for several high profile clients.

Additionally, Ms. Cyrulik is skilled at performing Phase I environmental site assessments and transaction screens to meet environmental due diligence requirements under CERCLA.

Representative Experience Includes:

Tishman Speyer Properties, nationwide: Hillmann has been providing the complete environmental program for Tishman Speyer’s properties since 1987. Our services include: phase I environmental site assessments, asbestos surveys, air monitoring, bid administration, O&M programs, industrial hygiene, and indoor air quality programs.

Ms. Cyrulik functions as an Industrial Hygienist on this contract, which is ongoing, and performs Indoor Air Quality Assessments.

Brookfield Properties, various locations: Since 1987, Hillmann has performed industrial hygiene, microbial, indoor air quality, asbestos surveys, project design investigations, project management, bulk sampling and analysis, and geotechnical services in numerous buildings in the New York and Los Angeles metropolitan areas. Ms.

Cyrulik is an Industrial Hygienist on this contract.

Gabriela Cyrulik
Environmental Technician
[email protected]
EDUCATION:

B.S. Geography and Minor in Environmental
Science, Montclair State University, Montclair,
NJ
CERTIFICATIONS:

OSHA 10-hr Construction Safety & Health
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE:

With Hillmann: 1 year
Total: 1 year

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1207 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1445 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:

Mr. Rutherford has currently functions as Hillman’s Quality Management Director and has served as the Director of Due Diligence as well. He has more than 30 years of experience in the environmental consulting industry, and over 26 years in managing and performing environmental property assessments including USEPA and NJDEP Preliminary Assessments.

As the Quality Management Director, Mr. Rutherford is responsible for overseeing the quality of all environmental and due diligence services across the company, including development of standard protocols, report content/templates, and account management strategies. He has managed large national accounts for real estate due diligence services including a desktop review service that handled nearly 500 properties per year. Mr. Rutherford is also the program manager for Hillmann’s NJDOH approved “Indoor Environmental Health Assessment of Child Care and Educational Facilities.”
Additionally, Mr. Rutherford performs and/or manages Phase II Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), Underground Storage Tank (UST) investigations/closures, Property Condition Assessments (PCA), Construction Monitoring inspections, Asbestos surveys, Asbestos Abatement Project Monitoring services, Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) surveys, NPDES Discharge Monitoring, Community Right-to-Know surveys, and Environmental Risk Analysis for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley act.

Representative experience includes:

Tishman Speyer Properties, various locations nationwide:

Hillmann has provided the complete environmental program for Tishman Speyer’s properties since 1987. Our services include phase I ESAs, asbestos surveys, air monitoring, bid administration, O&M programs, industrial hygiene, and indoor air quality programs. Mr.

Rutherford is a Project Manager on this contract. This contract is ongoing.

Citigroup, various locations nationwide: Since 1995, Hillmann has provided the complete environmental program including phase I ESAs, asbestos and lead surveys, air monitoring, bid administration, O&M programs, industrial hygiene, indoor air quality programs, geology services, radon testing, and hazardous materials assessments. Mr.

Rutherford is an Account Manager on this contract. This project is ongoing.

TD Bank, N.A., various locations: Hillmann has performed phase I ESAs at several properties on behalf of TD Bank, N.A. Mr. Rutherford manages the group that conducts the assessments for this contract, which is ongoing.

HSBC Bank, various locations nationwide/NYC Metro: Hillmann is providing the complete environmental program including phase I ESAs, asbestos surveys, air monitoring, bid administration, O&M programs, industrial hygiene, and indoor air quality programs. Mr. Rutherford is a Project Manager on this contract, which is ongoing.

David H. Rutherford
Quality Management Director
EDUCATION:

B.S. Environmental Sciences, Cook College,
New Brunswick, NJ
CERTIFICATIONS:
40-hr HAZWOPER 29 CFR 1910.120
Certified Hazardous Materials Manager 1992-
2003
10-hr OSHA Construction Safety & Health
Construction Procedures, Materials and Costs
– a ten-week course at Rutgers Center for
Continuing Professional Development
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE:

With Hillmann: 31 years
Total: 31 years

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1208 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1446 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) David Rutherford, page 2
Peapack Gladstone Bank, various locations in NY, NJ, and PA:

Hillmann has performed phase I ESAs at numerous properties on behalf of Peapack Gladstone Bank since 2013. Mr. Rutherford manages the staff that conducts the assessments for this contract, which is ongoing.

The Davis Companies, Norwalk, CT: On behalf of The Davis Companies, Hillmann provided an Advisory Report of analysis and opinion regarding the potential electromagnetic fields (EMF) health risks that may be associated with a newly constructed sub-station on an adjacent property.

Multi-Family Portfolio, New York, NY: Hillmann conducted environmental due diligence services and construction plan and cost review for a rehabilitation project of 45 low income multi-family apartment buildings in upper Manhattan. Mr. Rutherford coordinated and oversaw the completion of 45 phase I ESA reports and 5 phase II site investigations.

MBD Community Housing Corporation, Bronx, NY: Mr.

Rutherford’s staff has conducted environmental due diligence services for various multi-family apartment buildings located throughout New York City; including a portfolio of 11 buildings in Bronx, NY. Various projects have been completed between 2009 and 2016.

International Portfolio of Industrial Properties: Completed in 2012, Mr. Rutherford was the Project Manager for a multi-level environmental due diligence assessment for a portfolio of 113 light industrial properties located throughout the United States and Mexico.

Confidential client, various locations nationwide: Between 2008 and 2013, as a Project Manager, Mr. Rutherford was responsible for conducting multiple Risk Assessments. The purpose for conducting the assessments was to project a cost estimate for potential environmental liabilities associated with over 3,700 former drug store facilities in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley act.

4.1.n
Packet Pg. 1209 Attachment: Appendix E - Phase 1 ESA (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1447 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) APPENDIX F1
Preliminary Project Specific
Water Quality Management Plan

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1210 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1448 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1211 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1449 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 1 -
Project Specific Water Quality Management Plan
A Template for Projects located within the Santa Ana Watershed Region of Riverside County Project Title: McLeish Ranch
Development No: Tentative Tract 38203
Design Review/Case No: P22-022
Original Date Prepared: January 20, 2022
Revision Date(s):

Prepared for Compliance with
Regional Board Order No. R8-2010-0033
Template revised June 30, 2016
Contact Information:

Prepared for:

JAB Mill Creek, LLC
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 425
Irvine, CA 92612
(831) 383-8083
Prepared by:

Blaine Womer, President
Blaine A. Womer Civil Engineering
41555 E. Florida Avenue, Suite G
Hemet, CA 92544
(951) 658-1727
Preliminary
Final

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1212 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1450 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 2 -
A Brief Introduction
This Project-Specific WQMP Template for the Santa Ana Region has been prepared to help guide you in documenting compliance for your project. Because this document has been designed to specifically document compliance, you will need to utilize the WQMP Guidance Document as your “how-to” manual to help guide you through this process. Both the Template and Guidance Document go hand-in-hand, and will help facilitate a well prepared Project-Specific WQMP. Below is a flowchart for the layout of this Template that will provide the steps required to document compliance.

Section A Project and Site Information Section B Optimize Site Utilization Section C Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs) Section G Source Control BMPs Section I Operation, Maintenance, and Funding Section F Hydromodification Section E Alternative Compliance Section D Implement LID BMPs Section H Construction Plan Checklist

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1213 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1451 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1214 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1452 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 4 -
Table of Contents
Section A: Project and Site Information........................................................................................................ 6 A.1 Maps and Site Plans............................................................................................................................7 A.2 Identify Receiving Waters...................................................................................................................7 A.3 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project: ....................................................................8 Section B: Optimize Site Utilization (LID Principles) ..................................................................................... 9 Section C: Delineate Drainage Management Areas (DMAs)....................................................................... 10 Section D: Implement LID BMPs................................................................................................................. 12 D.1 Infiltration Applicability ....................................................................................................................12 D.2 Harvest and Use Assessment............................................................................................................13 D.3 Bioretention and Biotreatment Assessment....................................................................................15 D.4 Feasibility Assessment Summaries...................................................................................................16 D.5 LID BMP Sizing ..................................................................................................................................17 Section E: Alternative Compliance (LID Waiver Program).......................................................................... 18 E.1 Identify Pollutants of Concern ..........................................................................................................19 E.2 Stormwater Credits...........................................................................................................................20 E.3 Sizing Criteria.....................................................................................................................................20 E.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection ....................................................................................................21 Section F: Hydromodification ..................................................................................................................... 22 F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Analysis..........................................................................22 F.2 HCOC Mitigation................................................................................................................................23 Section G: Source Control BMPs................................................................................................................. 24 Section H: Construction Plan Checklist....................................................................................................... 26 Section I: Operation, Maintenance and Funding........................................................................................ 27

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1453 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 5 -
List of Tables
Table A.1 Identification of Receiving Waters................................................................................................7 Table A.2 Other Applicable Permits..............................................................................................................8 Table C.1 DMA Classifications.....................................................................................................................10 Table C.2 Type ‘A’, Self-Treating Areas.......................................................................................................10 Table C.3 Type ‘B’, Self-Retaining Areas .....................................................................................................10 Table C.4 Type ‘C’, Areas that Drain to Self-Retaining Areas......................................................................11 Table C.5 Type ‘D’, Areas Draining to BMPs ...............................................................................................11 Table D.1 Infiltration Feasibility ..................................................................................................................12 Table D.2 LID Prioritization Summary Matrix .............................................................................................16 Table D.3 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs...................................................................................................17 Table E.1 Potential Pollutants by Land Use Type........................................................................................19 Table E.2 Water Quality Credits..................................................................................................................20 Table E.3 Treatment Control BMP Sizing ....................................................................................................20 Table E.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection ..............................................................................................21 Table F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Summary ..............................................................................22 Table G.1 Permanent and Operational Source Control Measures .............................................................24 Table H.1 Construction Plan Cross-reference.............................................................................................26 List of Appendices
Appendix 1: Maps and Site Plans................................................................................................................28 Appendix 2: Construction Plans..................................................................................................................29 Appendix 3: Soils Information.....................................................................................................................30 Appendix 4: Historical Site Conditions........................................................................................................31 Appendix 5: LID Infeasibility........................................................................................................................32 Appendix 6: BMP Design Details.................................................................................................................33 Appendix 7: Hydromodification..................................................................................................................34 Appendix 8: Source Control ........................................................................................................................35 Appendix 9: O&M .......................................................................................................................................36 Appendix 10: Educational Materials...........................................................................................................37

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1216 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1454 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 6 -
Section A: Project and Site Information

PROJECT INFORMATION
Type of Project: Residential
Planning Area: N/A
Community Name: San Jacinto
Development Name: McLeish Ranch

PROJECT LOCATION
Latitude & Longitude (DMS): 33°48’22”N, -116°59’42”W
Project Watershed and Sub-Watershed: Watershed: Santa Ana River Sub-Watershed: San Jacinto Valley
Gross Acres: 96.0
APN(s): 436-080-001, 002, 006
Map Book and Page No.: Farm Lot 130 and a portion of Farm Lot 132, MB 8/357

PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
Proposed or Potential Land Use(s) Residential
Proposed or Potential SIC Code(s) N/A
Area of Impervious Project Footprint (SF) 1,903,120
Total Area of proposed Impervious Surfaces within the Project Footprint (SF)/or Replacement 1,903,120 Does the project consist of offsite road improvements? Y N Does the project propose to construct unpaved roads? Y N Is the project part of a larger common plan of development (phased project)? Y N

EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS
Total area of existing Impervious Surfaces within the Project limits Footprint (SF) 0 Is the project located within any MSHCP Criteria Cell? Y N If so, identify the Cell number: N/A
Are there any natural hydrologic features on the project site? Y N Is a Geotechnical Report attached? Y N
If no Geotech. Report, list the NRCS soils type(s) present on the site (A, B, C and/or D) N/A What is the Water Quality Design Storm Depth for the project? 0.70 Project Description: Tentative Tract 38203 (McLeish Ranch) is a proposed 424 lot subdivision plus 15 lettered lots for drainage, water quality mitigation and open space. Tentative Tract 38203 is located on

96.0 acres at the northwest corner of Lyon Avenue and De Anza Drive. Proposed lot sizes in the subdivision range from 3,600 sf to 5,200 sf plus. The project proposes a park site at the northwest corner of the property. The park area will be designed as self-retaining landscape. The park will also feature an infiltration basin for water quality mitigation. Site specific testing yielded infiltration rates ranging from 3.6 inches per hour to 4.1 inches per hour. The basin has been preliminarily designed to treat all impervious surfaces in the project including streets, concrete surfaces and roofs. It is anticipated that park and basin will be maintained through Community Facilities District 2020-1. The basin has been sized to mitigate HCOC 100% onsite as the site is not within a HCOC exemption area.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1217 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1455 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 7 -
A.1 Maps and Site Plans
When completing your Project-Specific WQMP, include a map of the local vicinity and existing site. In addition, include all grading, drainage, landscape/plant palette and other pertinent construction plans in Appendix 2. At a minimum, your WQMP Site Plan should include the following:
 Drainage Management Areas
 Proposed Structural BMPs
 Drainage Path
 Drainage Infrastructure, Inlets, Overflows
 Source Control BMPs
 Buildings, Roof Lines, Downspouts
 Impervious Surfaces
 Standard Labeling
 BMP Locations (Lat/Long)
Use your discretion on whether or not you may need to create multiple sheets or can appropriately accommodate these features on one or two sheets. Keep in mind that the Co-Permittee plan reviewer must be able to easily analyze your project utilizing this template and its associated site plans and maps.

Appendix 1 includes the following:
- Vicinity Map, A-1
- Regional Waters Map, A-2
- Drainage Area Map, A-3
- Post Construction BMP Site Plan, A-4
A.2 Identify Receiving Waters
Using Table A.1 below, list in order of upstream to downstream, the receiving waters that the project site is tributary to. Continue to fill each row with the Receiving Water’s 303(d) listed impairments (if any), designated beneficial uses, and proximity, if any, to a RARE beneficial use. Include a map of the receiving waters in Appendix 1.

Table A.1 Identification of Receiving Waters
Receiving Waters EPA Approved 303(d) List
Impairments
Designated
Beneficial Uses
Proximity to RARE
Beneficial Use
San Jacinto River
Reach 4
None AGR-GWR-REC1-REC2-WARM-WILD Not designated as RARE Canyon Lake Pathogens , Nutrients MUN-AGR-GWR-REC1-REC2-WARMWILD Not designated as RARE San Jacinto River Reach 1 None MUN-AGR-GWR-REC1-REC2-WARMWILD Not designated as RARE Lake Elsinore
Nutrients, PCB’s, Organic
Enrichment/ Dissolved Oxygen,
Sediment Toxicity, Unknown Toxicity
REC-1-REC2-WARM-WILD Not designated as RARE

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1218 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1456 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 8 -
A.3 Additional Permits/Approvals required for the Project:

Table A.2 Other Applicable Permits
Agency Permit Required
State Department of Fish and Game, 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement Y N State Water Resources Control Board, Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Water Quality Cert. Y N US Army Corps of Engineers, CWA Section 404 Permit Y N
US Fish and Wildlife, Endangered Species Act Section 7 Biological Opinion Y N Statewide Construction General Permit Coverage Y N
Statewide Industrial General Permit Coverage Y N
Western Riverside MSHCP Consistency Approval (e.g., JPR, DBESP) Y N Other (please list in the space below as required)
Y N
If yes is answered to any of the questions above, the Co-Permittee may require proof of approval/coverage from those agencies as applicable including documentation of any associated requirements that may affect this Project-Specific WQMP.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1219 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1457 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 9 -
Section B: Optimize Site Utilization (LID Principles)
Review of the information collected in Section ‘A’ will aid in identifying the principal constraints on site design and selection of LID BMPs as well as opportunities to reduce imperviousness and incorporate LID Principles into the site and landscape design. For example, constraints might include impermeable soils, high groundwater, groundwater pollution or contaminated soils, steep slopes, geotechnical instability, high-intensity land use, heavy pedestrian or vehicular traffic, utility locations or safety concerns.

Opportunities might include existing natural areas, low areas, oddly configured or otherwise unbuildable parcels, easements and landscape amenities including open space and buffers (which can double as locations for bioretention BMPs), and differences in elevation (which can provide hydraulic head).

Prepare a brief narrative for each of the site optimization strategies described below. This narrative will help you as you proceed with your LID design and explain your design decisions to others.

The 2010 Santa Ana MS4 Permit further requires that LID Retention BMPs (Infiltration Only or Harvest and Use) be used unless it can be shown that those BMPs are infeasible. Therefore, it is important that your narrative identify and justify if there are any constraints that would prevent the use of those categories of LID BMPs. Similarly, you should also note opportunities that exist which will be utilized during project design. Upon completion of identifying Constraints and Opportunities, include these on your WQMP Site plan in Appendix 1.

Consideration of “highest and best use” of the discharge should also be considered. For example, Lake Elsinore is evaporating faster than runoff from natural precipitation can recharge it. Requiring infiltration of 85% of runoff events for projects tributary to Lake Elsinore would only exacerbate current water quality problems associated with Pollutant concentration due to lake water evaporation. In cases where rainfall events have low potential to recharge Lake Elsinore (i.e. no hydraulic connection between groundwater to Lake Elsinore, or other factors), requiring infiltration of Urban Runoff from projects is counterproductive to the overall watershed goals. Project proponents, in these cases, would be allowed to discharge Urban Runoff, provided they used equally effective filtration-based BMPs.

Site Optimization
The following questions are based upon Section 3.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document. Review of the WQMP Guidance Document will help you determine how best to optimize your site and subsequently identify opportunities and/or constraints, and document compliance.

Did you identify and preserve existing drainage patterns? If so, how? If not, why? Existing drainage pattern is to the northwest. The project has been designed to honor the natural pattern.

Did you identify and protect existing vegetation? If so, how? If not, why? The property is regularly farmed, there is no existing vegetation to protect.

Did you identify and preserve natural infiltration capacity? If so, how? If not, why? Natural infiltration capacity was preserved at the low (northwest) corner of the site for stormwater mitigation. Infiltration rates vary from 3.6 inches per hour to 4.1 inches per hour.

Did you identify and minimize impervious area? If so, how? If not, why? To the greatest extent possible for a single family residential lot with approximately 4900 square feet of landscape area.

Did you identify and disperse runoff to adjacent pervious areas? If so, how? If not, why? Runoff is dispersed to an infiltration basin at the northwest corner of the property to mitigate stormwater pollutants and hydraulic conditions of concern.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1220 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1458 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 10 -
Section C: Delineate Drainage Management Areas
(DMAs)
Utilizing the procedure in Section 3.3 of the WQMP Guidance Document which discusses the methods of delineating and mapping your project site into individual DMAs, complete Table C.1 below to appropriately categorize the types of classification (e.g., Type A, Type B, etc.) per DMA for your project site. Upon completion of this table, this information will then be used to populate and tabulate the corresponding tables for their respective DMA classifications.

Table C.1 DMA Classifications
DMA Name or ID Surface Type(s)12 Area (Sq. Ft.) DMA Type A/1 Landscape/SW 7,433 Self-Treating
A/2 Landscape/SW 20,400 Self-Treating
B/1 Landscape 294,694 Self-Retaining
D/1 Roof 678,400 Drains to BMP
D/2 Asphalt 877,906 Drains to BMP
D/3 Concrete 361,068 Drains to BMP
D/4 Landscape 155,181 Drains to BMP
1Reference Table 2-1 in the WQMP Guidance Document to populate this column 2 If multi-surface provide back-up
Table C.2 Type ‘A’, Self-Treating Areas
DMA Name or ID Area (Sq. Ft.) Stabilization Type Irrigation Type (if any) A/1 7,433 Drought Tolerant Landscape Drip
A/2 20,400 Drought Tolerant Landscape Drip
Table C.3 Type ‘B’, Self-Retaining Areas
Self-Retaining Area
Type ‘C’ DMAs that are draining to the Self-Retaining
Area
DMA
Name/ ID
Post-project
surface type
Area
(square
feet)
Storm
Depth
(inches) DMA Name /
ID
[C] from Table C.4 =
Required Retention Depth
(inches)
[A] [B] [C] [D]
B/1 Landscape 294,694 0.70

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1221 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1459 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 11 -
[𝐷] = [𝐵] +
[𝐵] ∙ [𝐶]
[𝐴]
Table C.4 Type ‘C’, Areas that Drain to Self-Retaining Areas DMA Receiving Self-Retaining DMA DMA Name/ ID Area (square feet) Post-project surface type Impervious fraction Product
DMA name /ID
Area (square
feet) Ratio
[A] [B] [C] = [A] x [B] [D] [C]/[D]
N/A
Table C.5 Type ‘D’, Areas Draining to BMPs
DMA Name or ID BMP Name or ID
D/1 Infiltration Basin
D/2 Infiltration Basin
D/3 Infiltration Basin
D/4 Infiltration Basin
Note: More than one drainage management area can drain to a single LID BMP, however, one drainage management area may not drain to more than one BMP.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1222 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1460 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 12 -
Section D: Implement LID BMPs
D.1 Infiltration Applicability
Is there an approved downstream ‘Highest and Best Use’ for stormwater runoff (see discussion in Chapter

2.4.4 of the WQMP Guidance Document for further details)? Y N If yes has been checked, Infiltration BMPs shall not be used for the site; proceed to section D.3 If no, continue working through this section to implement your LID BMPs. It is recommended that you contact your Co-Permittee to verify whether or not your project discharges to an approved downstream ‘Highest and Best Use’ feature.

Geotechnical Report
A Geotechnical Report or Phase I Environmental Site Assessment may be required by the Copermittee to confirm present and past site characteristics that may affect the use of Infiltration BMPs. In addition, the Co-Permittee, at their discretion, may not require a geotechnical report for small projects as described in Chapter 2 of the WQMP Guidance Document. If a geotechnical report has been prepared, include it in Appendix 3. In addition, if a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been prepared, include it in Appendix 4.

Is this project classified as a small project consistent with the requirements of Chapter 2 of the WQMP Guidance Document? Y N
Infiltration Feasibility
Table D.1 below is meant to provide a simple means of assessing which DMAs on your site support Infiltration BMPs and is discussed in the WQMP Guidance Document in Chapter 2.4.5. Check the appropriate box for each question and then list affected DMAs as applicable. If additional space is needed, add a row below the corresponding answer.

Table D.1 Infiltration Feasibility
Does the project site… YES NO
…have any DMAs with a seasonal high groundwater mark shallower than 10 feet? X If Yes, list affected DMAs:
…have any DMAs located within 100 feet of a water supply well? X If Yes, list affected DMAs:
…have any areas identified by the geotechnical report as posing a public safety risk where infiltration of stormwater could have a negative impact? X
If Yes, list affected DMAs:
…have measured in-situ infiltration rates of less than 1.6 inches / hour? X If Yes, list affected DMAs:
…have significant cut and/or fill conditions that would preclude in-situ testing of infiltration rates at the final infiltration surface? X
If Yes, list affected DMAs:
…geotechnical report identify other site-specific factors that would preclude effective and safe infiltration? X Describe here:

If you answered “Yes” to any of the questions above for any DMA, Infiltration BMPs should not be used for those DMAs and you should proceed to the assessment for Harvest and Use below.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1223 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1461 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 13 -
D.2 Harvest and Use Assessment
Please check what applies:
☐ Reclaimed water will be used for the non-potable water demands for the project. ☐Downstream water rights may be impacted by Harvest and Use as approved by the Regional Board (verify with the Copermittee).
☒The Design Capture Volume will be addressed using Infiltration Only BMPs. In such a case, Harvest and Use BMPs are still encouraged, but it would not be required if the Design Capture Volume will be infiltrated or evapotranspired.

If any of the above boxes have been checked, Harvest and Use BMPs need not be assessed for the site. If none of the above criteria applies, follow the steps below to assess the feasibility of irrigation use, toilet use and other non-potable uses (e.g., industrial use).

Irrigation Use Feasibility
Complete the following steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for Irrigation Use BMPs on your site:

Step 1: Identify the total area of irrigated landscape on the site, and the type of landscaping used.

Total Area of Irrigated Landscape: Insert Area (Acres)
Type of Landscaping (Conservation Design or Active Turf): List Landscaping Type Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for irrigation use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above.

Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: Insert Area (Acres)
Step 3: Cross reference the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A of the WQMP Guidance Document) with the left column of Table 2-3 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum area of Effective Irrigated Area per Tributary Impervious Area (EIATIA).

Enter your EIATIA factor: EIATIA Factor
Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum irrigated area that would be required.

Minimum required irrigated area: Insert Area (Acres)
Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for irrigation use is feasible for the project by comparing the total area of irrigated landscape (Step 1) to the minimum required irrigated area (Step 4).

Minimum required irrigated area (Step 4) Available Irrigated Landscape (Step 1) Insert Area (Acres) Insert Area (Acres)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1224 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1462 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 14 -
Toilet Use Feasibility
Complete the following steps to determine the feasibility of harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet flushing uses on your site:

Step 1: Identify the projected total number of daily toilet users during the wet season, and account for any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy:

Projected Number of Daily Toilet Users: Number of daily Toilet Users Project Type: Enter 'Residential', 'Commercial', 'Industrial' or 'Schools' Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for toilet use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above.

Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: Insert Area (Acres)
Step 3: Enter the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2- 2 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum number or toilet users per tributary impervious acre (TUTIA).

Enter your TUTIA factor: TUTIA Factor
Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum number of toilet users that would be required.

Minimum number of toilet users: Required number of toilet users Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for toilet flushing use is feasible for the project by comparing the Number of Daily Toilet Users (Step 1) to the minimum required number of toilet users (Step 4).

Minimum required Toilet Users (Step 4) Projected number of toilet users (Step 1) Insert Area (Acres) Insert Area (Acres)
Other Non-Potable Use Feasibility
Are there other non-potable uses for stormwater runoff on the site (e.g. industrial use)? See Chapter 2 of the Guidance for further information. If yes, describe below. If no, write N/A.

Insert narrative description here.

Step 1: Identify the projected average daily non-potable demand, in gallons per day, during the wet season and accounting for any periodic shut downs or other lapses in occupancy or operation.

Average Daily Demand: Projected Average Daily Use (gpd) Step 2: Identify the planned total of all impervious areas on the proposed project from which runoff might be feasibly captured and stored for the identified non-potable use. Depending on the configuration of buildings and other impervious areas on the site, you may consider the site as a whole, or parts of the site, to evaluate reasonable scenarios for capturing and storing runoff and directing the stored runoff to the potential use(s) identified in Step 1 above.

Total Area of Impervious Surfaces: Insert Area (Acres)

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1225 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1463 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 15 -
Step 3: Enter the Design Storm depth for the project site (see Exhibit A) into the left column of Table 2- 4 in Chapter 2 to determine the minimum demand for non-potable uses per tributary impervious acre.

Enter the factor from Table 2-4: Enter Value
Step 4: Multiply the unit value obtained from Step 3 by the total of impervious areas from Step 2 to develop the minimum number of gallons per day of non-potable use that would be required.

Minimum required use: Minimum use required (gpd)
Step 5: Determine if harvesting stormwater runoff for other non-potable use is feasible for the project by comparing the projected average daily use (Step 1) to the minimum required non-potable use (Step 4).

Minimum required non-potable use (Step 4) Projected average daily use (Step 1) Minimum use required (gpd) Projected Average Daily Use (gpd) If Irrigation, Toilet and Other Use feasibility anticipated demands are less than the applicable minimum values, Harvest and Use BMPs are not required and you should proceed to utilize LID Bioretention and Biotreatment per Section 3.4.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document.

D.3 Bioretention and Biotreatment Assessment
Other LID Bioretention and Biotreatment BMPs as described in Chapter 2.4.7 of the WQMP Guidance Document are feasible on nearly all development sites with sufficient advance planning.

Select one of the following:
☐ LID Bioretention/Biotreatment BMPs will be used for some or all DMAs of the project as noted below in Section D.4 (note the requirements of Section 3.4.2 in the WQMP Guidance Document). ☐ A site-specific analysis demonstrating the technical infeasibility of all LID BMPs has been performed and is included in Appendix 5. If you plan to submit an analysis demonstrating the technical infeasibility of LID BMPs, request a pre-submittal meeting with the Copermittee to discuss this option. Proceed to Section E to document your alternative compliance measures.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1226 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1464 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 16 -
D.4 Feasibility Assessment Summaries
From the Infiltration, Harvest and Use, Bioretention and Biotreatment Sections above, complete Table D.2 below to summarize which LID BMPs are technically feasible, and which are not, based upon the established hierarchy.

Table D.2 LID Prioritization Summary Matrix
DMA
Name/ID
LID BMP Hierarchy No LID
(Alternative

1. Infiltration 2. Harvest and use 3. Bioretention 4. Biotreatment Compliance) D/1
D/2
D/3
D/4
For those DMAs where LID BMPs are not feasible, provide a brief narrative below summarizing why they are not feasible, include your technical infeasibility criteria in Appendix 5, and proceed to Section E below to document Alternative Compliance measures for those DMAs. Recall that each proposed DMA must pass through the LID BMP hierarchy before alternative compliance measures may be considered.

Insert narrative description here.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1227 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1465 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 17 -
D.5 LID BMP Sizing
Each LID BMP must be designed to ensure that the Design Capture Volume will be addressed by the selected BMPs. First, calculate the Design Capture Volume for each LID BMP using the VBMP worksheet in Appendix F of the LID BMP Design Handbook. Second, design the LID BMP to meet the required VBMP using a method approved by the Copermittee. Utilize the worksheets found in the LID BMP Design Handbook or consult with your Copermittee to assist you in correctly sizing your LID BMPs. Complete Table D.3 below to document the Design Capture Volume and the Proposed Volume for each LID BMP. Provide the completed design procedure sheets for each LID BMP in Appendix 6. You may add additional rows to the table below as needed.

Table D.3 DCV Calculations for LID BMPs
DMA
Type/ID
DMA
Area
(square
feet)
PostProject
Surface
Type
Effective
Impervious
Fraction, If
DMA
Runoff
Factor
DMA Areas
x Runoff
Factor
Infiltration Basin
[A] [B] [C] [A] x [C]
D/1 678,400 Roof 1.0 0.89 605,132.8
Design
Storm
Depth
(in)
Design
Capture
Volume, VBMP
(cubic feet)
Proposed
Volume
on Plans
(cubic
feet)
D/2 877,906 Asphalt 1.0 0.89 783,092.2
D/3 361,068 Concrete 1.0 0.89 322,072.7
D/4 155,181 Landscape 0.1 0.11 17,141
2,072,555 1,727,438.7 0.70 100,767.3 244,227
[B], [C] is obtained as described in Section 2.3.1 of the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is obtained from Exhibit A in the WQMP Guidance Document [G] is obtained from a design procedure sheet, such as in LID BMP Design Handbook and placed in Appendix 6

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1228 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1466 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 18 -
Section E: Alternative Compliance (LID Waiver Program)
LID BMPs are expected to be feasible on virtually all projects. Where LID BMPs have been demonstrated to be infeasible as documented in Section D, other Treatment Control BMPs must be used (subject to LID waiver approval by the Copermittee). Check one of the following Boxes:
☒ LID Principles and LID BMPs have been incorporated into the site design to fully address all Drainage Management Areas. No alternative compliance measures are required for this project and thus this Section is not required to be completed.
- Or -
☐ The following Drainage Management Areas are unable to be addressed using LID BMPs. A sitespecific analysis demonstrating technical infeasibility of LID BMPs has been approved by the CoPermittee and included in Appendix 5. Additionally, no downstream regional and/or sub-regional LID BMPs exist or are available for use by the project. The following alternative compliance measures on the following pages are being implemented to ensure that any pollutant loads expected to be discharged by not incorporating LID BMPs, are fully mitigated.

List DMAs here.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1229 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1467 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 19 -
E.1 Identify Pollutants of Concern
Utilizing Table A.1 from Section A above which noted your project’s receiving waters and their associated EPA approved 303(d) listed impairments, cross reference this information with that of your selected Priority Development Project Category in Table E.1 below. If the identified General Pollutant Categories are the same as those listed for your receiving waters, then these will be your Pollutants of Concern and the appropriate box or boxes will be checked on the last row. The purpose of this is to document compliance and to help you appropriately plan for mitigating your Pollutants of Concern in lieu of implementing LID BMPs.

Table E.1 Potential Pollutants by Land Use Type
Priority Development
Project Categories and/or
Project Features (check those
that apply)
General Pollutant Categories
Bacterial
Indicators Metals Nutrients Pesticides
Toxic
Organic
Compounds
Sediments Trash &
Debris
Oil &
Grease
Detached Residential
Development P N P P N P P P
Attached Residential
Development P N P P N P P P(2)
Commercial/Industrial
Development P(3) P P(1) P(1) P(5) P(1) P P
Automotive Repair
Shops N P N N P(4, 5) N P P
Restaurants
(>5,000 ft2)

P N N N N N P P
Hillside Development
(>5,000 ft2)

P N P P N P P P
Parking Lots
(>5,000 ft2)
P(6) P P(1) P(1) P(4) P(1) P P
Retail Gasoline Outlets N P N N P N P P
Project Priority Pollutant(s)
of Concern
P = Potential
N = Not Potential
(1) A potential Pollutant if non-native landscaping exists or is proposed onsite; otherwise not expected (2) A potential Pollutant if the project includes uncovered parking areas; otherwise not expected (3) A potential Pollutant is land use involving animal waste (4) Specifically petroleum hydrocarbons
(5) Specifically solvents
(6) Bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1230 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1468 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 20 -
E.2 Stormwater Credits
Projects that cannot implement LID BMPs but nevertheless implement smart growth principles are potentially eligible for Stormwater Credits. Utilize Table 3-8 within the WQMP Guidance Document to identify your Project Category and its associated Water Quality Credit. If not applicable, write N/A.

Table E.2 Water Quality Credits
Qualifying Project Categories Credit Percentage2
N/A
Total Credit Percentage1
1Cannot Exceed 50%
2Obtain corresponding data from Table 3-8 in the WQMP Guidance Document E.3 Sizing Criteria
After you appropriately considered Stormwater Credits for your project, utilize Table E.3 below to appropriately size them to the DCV, or Design Flow Rate, as applicable. Please reference Chapter 3.5.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document for further information.

Table E.3 Treatment Control BMP Sizing
DMA
Type/ID
DMA
Area
(square
feet)
PostProject
Surface
Type
Effective
Impervious
Fraction, If
DMA
Runoff
Factor
DMA
Area x
Runoff
Factor
Enter BMP Name / Identifier Here
[A] [B] [C] [A] x [C]
N/A
Design
Storm
Depth
(in)
Minimum
Design
Capture
Volume or
Design Flow
Rate (cubic
feet or cfs)
Total Storm
Water
Credit %
Reduction
Proposed
Volume
or Flow
on Plans
(cubic
feet or
cfs)
AT =
Σ[A] Σ= [D] [E] [F] =
[D]x[E]
[G]
[F] X (1-[H]) [I]
[B], [C] is obtained as described in Section 2.3.1 from the WQMP Guidance Document [E] is for Flow-Based Treatment Control BMPs [E] = .2, for Volume-Based Control Treatment BMPs, [E] obtained from Exhibit A in the WQMP Guidance Document
[G] is for Flow-Based Treatment Control BMPs [G] = 43,560, for Volume-Based Control Treatment BMPs, [G] = 12 [H] is from the Total Credit Percentage as Calculated from Table E.2 above [I] as obtained from a design procedure sheet from the BMP manufacturer and should be included in Appendix 6

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1231 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1469 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 21 -
E.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection
Treatment Control BMPs typically provide proprietary treatment mechanisms to treat potential pollutants in runoff, but do not sustain significant biological processes. Treatment Control BMPs must have a removal efficiency of a medium or high effectiveness as quantified below:
 High: equal to or greater than 80% removal efficiency  Medium: between 40% and 80% removal efficiency
Such removal efficiency documentation (e.g., studies, reports, etc.) as further discussed in Chapter 3.5.2 of the WQMP Guidance Document, must be included in Appendix 6. In addition, ensure that proposed Treatment Control BMPs are properly identified on the WQMP Site Plan in Appendix 1.

Table E.4 Treatment Control BMP Selection
Selected Treatment Control BMP
Name or ID1
Priority Pollutant(s) of
Concern to Mitigate2
Removal Efficiency
Percentage3
N/A
1 Treatment Control BMPs must not be constructed within Receiving Waters. In addition, a proposed Treatment Control BMP may be listed more than once if they possess more than one qualifying pollutant removal efficiency. 2 Cross Reference Table E.1 above to populate this column. 3 As documented in a Co-Permittee Approved Study and provided in Appendix 6.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1470 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 22 -
Section F: Hydromodification
F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOC) Analysis
Once you have determined that the LID design is adequate to address water quality requirements, you will need to assess if the proposed LID Design may still create a HCOC. Review Chapters 2 and 3 (including Figure 3-7) of the WQMP Guidance Document to determine if your project must mitigate for Hydromodification impacts. If your project meets one of the following criteria which will be indicated by the check boxes below, you do not need to address Hydromodification at this time. However, if the project does not qualify for Exemptions 1, 2 or 3, then additional measures must be added to the design to comply with HCOC criteria. This is discussed in further detail below in Section F.2.

HCOC EXEMPTION 1: The Priority Development Project disturbs less than one acre. The Copermittee has the discretion to require a Project-Specific WQMP to address HCOCs on projects less than one acre on a case by case basis. The disturbed area calculation should include all disturbances associated with larger common plans of development.

Does the project qualify for this HCOC Exemption? Y N
If Yes, HCOC criteria do not apply.

HCOC EXEMPTION 2: The volume and time of concentration1 of storm water runoff for the postdevelopment condition is not significantly different from the pre-development condition for a 2-year return frequency storm (a difference of 5% or less is considered insignificant) using one of the following methods to calculate:
 Riverside County Hydrology Manual
 Technical Release 55 (TR-55): Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (NRCS 1986), or derivatives thereof, such as the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method  Other methods acceptable to the Co-Permittee
Does the project qualify for this HCOC Exemption? Y N
If Yes, report results in Table F.1 below and provide your substantiated hydrologic analysis in Appendix 7.

Table F.1 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Summary
2 year – 24 hour
Pre-condition Post-condition % Difference
Time of
Concentration 13+30 13+30 0
Volume (Cubic Feet) 74,471 368,270 *
1 Time of concentration is defined as the time after the beginning of the rainfall when all portions of the drainage basin are contributing to flow at the outlet.
* Project is not HCOC exempt. Therefore, the entire 2 year, 24-hour developed condition runoff, 368,270 cf, is retained on site.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1233 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1471 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 23 -
HCOC EXEMPTION 3: All downstream conveyance channels to an adequate sump (for example, Prado Dam, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Santa Ana River, or other lake, reservoir or naturally erosion resistant feature) that will receive runoff from the project are engineered and regularly maintained to ensure design flow capacity; no sensitive stream habitat areas will be adversely affected; or are not identified on the Co-Permittees Hydromodification Susceptibility Maps.

Does the project qualify for this HCOC Exemption? Y N
If Yes, HCOC criteria do not apply and note below which adequate sump applies to this HCOC qualifier:

INSERT TEXT HERE
F.2 HCOC Mitigation
If none of the above HCOC Exemption Criteria are applicable, HCOC criteria is considered mitigated if they meet one of the following conditions:
a. Additional LID BMPS are implemented onsite or offsite to mitigate potential erosion or habitat impacts as a result of HCOCs. This can be conducted by an evaluation of site-specific conditions utilizing accepted professional methodologies published by entities such as the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project (SCCRWP), or other Co-Permittee approved methodologies for site-specific HCOC analysis. b. The project is developed consistent with an approved Watershed Action Plan that addresses HCOC in Receiving Waters.
c. Mimicking the pre-development hydrograph with the post-development hydrograph, for a 2-year return frequency storm. Generally, the hydrologic conditions of concern are not significant, if the post-development hydrograph is no more than 10% greater than pre-development hydrograph.

In cases where excess volume cannot be infiltrated or captured and reused, discharge from the site must be limited to a flow rate no greater than 110% of the pre-development 2-year peak flow.

Be sure to include all pertinent documentation used in your analysis of the items a, b or c in Appendix 7.

F.2.c.: Project has been designed to retain the 100% of the 2 year-24 hour storm in the developed condition to meet HCOC requirements.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1234 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1472 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 24 -
Section G: Source Control BMPs
Source control BMPs include permanent, structural features that may be required in your project plans — such as roofs over and berms around trash and recycling areas — and Operational BMPs, such as regular sweeping and “housekeeping”, that must be implemented by the site’s occupant or user. The MEP standard typically requires both types of BMPs. In general, Operational BMPs cannot be substituted for a feasible and effective permanent BMP. Using the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist in Appendix 8, review the following procedure to specify Source Control BMPs for your site:

1. Identify Pollutant Sources: Review Column 1 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Check off the potential sources of Pollutants that apply to your site.

2. Note Locations on Project-Specific WQMP Exhibit: Note the corresponding requirements listed in Column 2 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. Show the location of each Pollutant source and each permanent Source Control BMP in your Project-Specific WQMP Exhibit located in Appendix 1.

3. Prepare a Table and Narrative: Check off the corresponding requirements listed in Column 3 in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. In the left column of Table G.1 below, list each potential source of runoff Pollutants on your site (from those that you checked in the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist). In the middle column, list the corresponding permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs (from Columns 2 and 3 of the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist) used to prevent Pollutants from entering runoff. Add additional narrative in this column that explains any special features, materials or methods of construction that will be used to implement these permanent, Structural Source Control BMPs.

4. Identify Operational Source Control BMPs: To complete your table, refer once again to the Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist. List in the right column of your table the Operational BMPs that should be implemented as long as the anticipated activities continue at the site. Copermittee stormwater ordinances require that applicable Source Control BMPs be implemented; the same BMPs may also be required as a condition of a use permit or other revocable Discretionary Approval for use of the site.

Table G.1 Permanent and Operational Source Control Measures Potential Sources of Runoff
pollutants
Permanent Structural Source
Control BMPs
Operational Source Control BMPs
Onsite Storm Drain Inlets Mark all inlets “only rain in the drain”
Maintain stencil. Provide storm
water info to new homeowners.

BMP SD-13
Need for future indoor and
structural pest control
Note building design features
that discourage entry of pests.

Provide Integrated Pest
Management information to
owners, lessees, and operators.

Landscape/Outdoor Pesticide
Use
Landscaping design to minimize
irrigation and runoff
Maintenance and homeowner
education. Maintain landscaping
using minimum or no pesticides.

Provide IPM info to homeowner.

BMP SD-10, SD-12, SC-73

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1235 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1473 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 25 -
Design landscaping to minimize
irrigation and runoff, to promote
surface infiltration where
appropriate, and to minimize the
use of fertilizers and pesticides
that can contribute to
stormwater pollution.

Consider using pest-resistant
plants, especially adjacent to
hardscape.

To insure successful
establishment, select plants
appropriate to site soils, slopes,
climate, sun, wind, rain, land
use, air movement, ecological
consistency, and plant
interactions.

Maintain landscaping using
minimum or no pesticides.

Provide IPM information to new
owners, lessees and operators.

Vehicle/Equipment Repair and
Maintenance
State that no vehicle repair or
maintenance will be done
outdoors, or else describe the
required features of the outdoor
work area.

No person shall dispose of, nor
permit the disposal, directly or
indirectly of vehicle fluids,
hazardous materials, or rinse
water from parts cleaning into
storm drains.

No vehicle fluid removal shall be
performed outside a building,
nor on asphalt or ground
surfaces, whether inside or
outside a building, except in such
a manner as to ensure that any
spilled fluid will be in an area of
secondary containment. Leaking
vehicle fluids shall be contained
or drained from the vehicle
immediately.

Roof Gutters N/A Avoid roofing, gutters and trim
made of copper or other
unprotected metals that may
leach into runoff.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1236 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1474 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 26 -
Section H: Construction Plan Checklist
Populate Table H.1 below to assist the plan checker in an expeditious review of your project. The first two columns will contain information that was prepared in previous steps, while the last column will be populated with the corresponding plan sheets. This table is to be completed with the submittal of your final Project-Specific WQMP.

Table H.1 Construction Plan Cross-reference
BMP No. or
ID
BMP Identifier and
Description
Corresponding Plan Sheet(s) BMP Location (Lat/Long)
To be included in the Final WQMP
Note that the updated table — or Construction Plan WQMP Checklist — is only a reference tool to facilitate an easy comparison of the construction plans to your Project-Specific WQMP. Co-Permittee staff can advise you regarding the process required to propose changes to the approved Project-Specific WQMP.

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1237 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1475 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 27 -
Section I: Operation, Maintenance and Funding
The Copermittee will periodically verify that Stormwater BMPs on your site are maintained and continue to operate as designed. To make this possible, your Copermittee will require that you include in Appendix 9 of this Project-Specific WQMP:

1. A means to finance and implement facility maintenance in perpetuity, including replacement cost.

2. Acceptance of responsibility for maintenance from the time the BMPs are constructed until responsibility for operation and maintenance is legally transferred. A warranty covering a period following construction may also be required.

3. An outline of general maintenance requirements for the Stormwater BMPs you have selected.

4. Figures delineating and designating pervious and impervious areas, location, and type of Stormwater BMP, and tables of pervious and impervious areas served by each facility. Geolocating the BMPs using a coordinate system of latitude and longitude is recommended to help facilitate a future statewide database system.

5. A separate list and location of self-retaining areas or areas addressed by LID Principles that do not require specialized O&M or inspections but will require typical landscape maintenance as noted in Chapter 5, pages 85-86, in the WQMP Guidance. Include a brief description of typical landscape maintenance for these areas.

Your local Co-Permittee will also require that you prepare and submit a detailed Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan that sets forth a maintenance schedule for each of the Stormwater BMPs built on your site. An agreement assigning responsibility for maintenance and providing for inspections and certification may also be required.

Details of these requirements and instructions for preparing a Stormwater BMP Operation and Maintenance Plan are in Chapter 5 of the WQMP Guidance Document.

Maintenance Mechanism: City CFD
Will the proposed BMPs be maintained by a Home Owners’ Association (HOA) or Property Owners Association (POA)?
Y N
Include your Operation and Maintenance Plan and Maintenance Mechanism in Appendix 9. Additionally, include all pertinent forms of educational materials for those personnel that will be maintaining the proposed BMPs within this Project-Specific WQMP in Appendix 10.

To be included in the Final WQMP

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1238 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1476 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 28 -
Appendix 1: Maps and Site Plans
Vicinity Map, Receiving Waters Map and WQMP Site Plan

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1239 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1477 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1240 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1478 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1241 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1479 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 9 33 177 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 18 11 16 TR 31037 TRACT 31037-1 MB 371/75-78 TRACT 31037-3 MB 416/96-101 TRACT 31037 MB 417/1-6 APN 436-080-009 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SAN JACINTO RESERVOIR SEAL DIG ALERT FOR W.O. SCALE BENCHMARK: DATE DATE CITY APPR. CHECKED BY: BY MARK ENGINEER REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DATE DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. FILE NO. R.C.E. NO. 1 APPROVED BY: EXP. DATE DATE PREPARED BY: DATE CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. NO. EXP. DATE Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347 OF 1 SHEETS Park City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302, Phone/Fax (435)615-1489 BWA CITY OF SAN JACINTO TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 38203 DRAINAGE AREA MAP EXHIBIT A-3 INFILTRATION BASIN SECTION 4.1.o Packet Pg. 1242 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1480
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 9 33 177 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 18 11 16 TR 31037 TRACT 31037-1 MB 371/75-78 TRACT 31037-3 MB 416/96-101 TRACT 31037 MB 417/1-6 APN 436-080-009 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 SAN JACINTO RESERVOIR SEAL DIG ALERT FOR W.O. SCALE BENCHMARK: DATE DATE CITY APPR. CHECKED BY: BY MARK ENGINEER REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DATE DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. FILE NO. R.C.E. NO. 1 APPROVED BY: EXP. DATE DATE PREPARED BY: DATE CITY ENGINEER R.C.E. NO. EXP. DATE Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347 OF 1 SHEETS Park City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302, Phone/Fax (435)615-1489 BWA CITY OF SAN JACINTO TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 38203 DRAINAGE AREA MAP EXHIBIT A-3 INFILTRATION BASIN SECTION 4.1.o Packet Pg. 1243 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1481
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 29 -
Appendix 2: Construction Plans
Grading and Drainage Plans
To be included in the Final WQMP

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1244 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1482 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 30 -
Appendix 3: Soils Information
Geotechnical Study and Other Infiltration Testing Data

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1245 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1483 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1246 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1484 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1247 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1485 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 31 -
Appendix 4: Historical Site Conditions
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment or Other Information on Past Site Use Not Available

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1248 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1486 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 32 -
Appendix 5: LID Infeasibility
LID Technical Infeasibility Analysis
Not Applicable

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1249 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1487 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 33 -
Appendix 6: BMP Design Details
BMP Sizing, Design Details and other Supporting Documentation

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1250 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1488 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1251 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1489 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1252 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1490 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 34 -
Appendix 7: Hydromodification
Supporting Detail Relating to Hydrologic Conditions of Concern

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1253 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1491 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1254 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1492 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1255 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1493 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1256 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1494 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1257 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1495 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1258 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1496 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1259 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1497 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1260 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1498 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1261 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1499 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1262 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1500 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1263 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1501 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1264 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1502 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1265 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1503 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1266 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1504 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1267 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1505 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1268 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1506 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 35 -
Appendix 8: Source Control
Pollutant Sources/Source Control Checklist

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1269 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1507 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1270
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1508
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1271
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1509
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1272
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1510
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1273
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1511
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1274
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1512
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1275
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1513
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1276
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1514
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1277
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1515
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1278
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1516
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1279
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1517
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1280
Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1518
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative - 36 -
Appendix 9: O&M
Operation and Maintenance Plan and Documentation of Finance, Maintenance and Recording Mechanisms To be included in the Final WQMP

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1281 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1519 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) - 37 -
Appendix 10: Educational Materials
BMP Fact Sheets, Maintenance Guidelines and Other End-User BMP Information To be included in the Final WQMP

4.1.o
Packet Pg. 1282 Attachment: Appendix F1 - Preliminary WQMP (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1520 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) APPENDIX F2
Preliminary Hydrology Study

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1283 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1521 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1284 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1522 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

PRELIMINARY

HYDROLOGY STUDY
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 38203
Prepared by:

BLAINE A. WOMER CIVIL ENGINEERING
41555 East Florida Avenue, Suite G
Hemet, CA 92544
January 24, 2022
Revised May 5, 2022

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1285 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1523 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Table of Contents
1: Study Narrative and Runoff Summary
Appendix A: Vicinity Map, Soils Group Map, Precipitation Plates, Runoff Index Plate
Appendix B: 10-Year and 100-Year Rational Hydrology Calculations, Undeveloped Condition. Hydrology Exhibit Undeveloped
Condition
Appendix C: 10-Year and 100-Year Rational Hydrology Calculations, Developed Condition. Hydrology Exhibit Developed
Condition
Appendix D: Preliminary Basin Sizing Hydrology for Mitigating Incremental Increase
- 10-Year, 24 Hour Unit Hydrograph, Undeveloped Condition - 10-Year, 24 Hour Unit Hydrograph, Developed Condition - Unit Hydrograph Exhibit - Undeveloped Condition
- Unit Hydrograph Exhibit - Developed Condition

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1286 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1524 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 38203

PRELILMINARY HYDROLOGY STUDY
NARRATIVE:

Tentative Tract No. 38203 is a 424 lot subdivision on 96.0 acres located at the northwest corner of Lyon Avenue and De Anza Drive, north of the San Jacinto Reservoir. The site naturally drains to the west/northwest and the project has been conceptually designed to honor that drainage pattern.

The Casa Loma Siphon (13.5’ dia.) traverses the southeasterly one third of the project. The cover depth of the siphon in the vicinity of the tract is 4 feet to 6 feet. The site has been preliminarily designed to minimize cut or fill over the siphon. Street drainage has been designed to flow southeast to northwest observing the natural drainage pattern. Site soils are BC, per the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Hydrology Manual.

The site has been designed to drain to an onsite infiltration/retention basin. The basin is located at the west property line of the tract. The basin serves as a water quality mitigation basin, as well as, stormwater mitigation, the design of which is discussed in the project P-WQMP. With respect to stormwater mitigation, the basin has the capacity to retain the developed condition 10-yerar, 24- hour storm volume in accordance with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District preliminary design criteria. Required storage is 13.6 acre-foot, and provided storage is

26.2 acre-foot (See Appendix ‘D’). The basin discharges volume in excess of VBMP over time by way of a City standard pump station. The pump station inlet elevation is set at the water surface for VBMP. Overflow discharge is through an outlet structure at the northerly most corner of the basin. Emergency outlet flows are directed to De Anza Drive. Basin sedimentation is mitigated through the use of fore-bays at the storm drain outlets. Unit hydrograph calculations for the preliminary design are included in Appendix D of this report.

Due to topography and the location of the San Jacinto Reservoir, the site is not subject to offsite runoff.

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1287 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1525 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) The following report also includes rational hydrology calculations for the 10-year and 100-year recurrence interval for the undeveloped and developed site conditions. Stormwater flows are intercepted via onsite storm drain systems throughout the tract, and discharged to the infiltration/retention basin discussed above. Peak runoff flows within the subdivision are summarized as follows:

Rational Hydrology Runoff Summary
Drainage Area Designation* Area (Ac) Q10(cfs) Q100 (cfs) Undeveloped Site 108.6 79.1 130.2
Area B 37.2 39.5 63.5
Area C 18.2 17.4 27.4
Area D 25.1 21.6 34.7
Area E 10.0 11.3 17.6
* See Rational Hydrology Exhibits in Appendix B and C

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1288 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1526 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1289 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1527 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1290 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1528 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1291 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1529 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1292 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1530 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1293 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1531 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1294 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1532 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1295 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1533 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1296 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1534 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1297 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1535 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1298 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1536 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1299 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1537 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1300 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1538 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1301 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1539 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1302 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1540 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1303 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1541 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1304 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1542 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1305 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1543 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 9 33 177 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 18 11 16 TR 31037 EXISTING SFR SAN JACINTO RESERVOIR CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEAL DIG ALERT FOR W.O. SCALE BENCHMARK: DATE DATE CITY APPR. CHECKED BY: BY MARK ENGINEER REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DATE DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. FILE NO. 1 PREPARED BY: DATE R.C.E. NO. Park City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 OF 1 SHEETS Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347 CIVIL ENGINEERING BWA BLAINE A. WOMER Boise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-7555 1" = 200' DECEMBER, 2021 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38203 LAB MILL CREEK, LLC 0 200 400 600 1" = 200' HYDROLOGY EXHIBIT-UNDEV. COND. DRAINAGE BOUNDARY FLOW DIRECTION NODE NUMBER AREA DESIGNATION AREA IN ACRES 1 LEGEND 4.1.p Packet Pg. 1306 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1544
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1307 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1545 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1308 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1546 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1309 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1547 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1310 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1548 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1311 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1549 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1312 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1550 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1313 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1551 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1314 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1552 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1315 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1553 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1316 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1554 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1317 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1555 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1318 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1556 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1319 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1557 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1320 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1558 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1321 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1559 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1322 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1560 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1323 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1561 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1324 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1562 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1325 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1563 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1326 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1564 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1327 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1565 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1328 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1566 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1329 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1567 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1330 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1568 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1331 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1569 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1332 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1570 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1333 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1571 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1334 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1572 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 177 9 33 177 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 18 11 16 TR 31037 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 9 6 5 4 3 7 8 2 1 CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEAL DIG ALERT FOR W.O. SCALE BENCHMARK: DATE DATE CITY APPR. CHECKED BY: BY MARK ENGINEER REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DATE DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. FILE NO. 1 PREPARED BY: DATE R.C.E. NO. Park City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 OF 1 SHEETS Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347 CIVIL ENGINEERING BWA BLAINE A. WOMER Boise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-7555 1" = 200' DECEMBER, 2021 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38203 LAB MILL CREEK, LLC 0 200 400 600 1" = 150 DRAINAGE BOUNDARY FLOW DIRECTION NODE NUMBER AREA DESIGNATION AREA IN ACRES 1 LEGEND HYDROLOGY EXHIBIT DEVELOPED CONTITION 4.1.p Packet Pg. 1335 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1573
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1336 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1574 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1337 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1575 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1338 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1576 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1339 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1577 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1340 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1578 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1341 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1579 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1342 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1580 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1343 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1581 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1344 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1582 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1345 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1583 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 9 33 177 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 18 11 16 TR 31037 CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEAL DIG ALERT FOR W.O. SCALE BENCHMARK: DATE DATE CITY APPR. CHECKED BY: BY MARK ENGINEER REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DATE DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. FILE NO. 1 PREPARED BY: DATE R.C.E. NO. Park City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 OF 1 SHEETS Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347 CIVIL ENGINEERING BWA BLAINE A. WOMER Boise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-7555 1" = 200' DECEMBER, 2021 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38203 LAB MILL CREEK, LLC 0 200 400 600 1" = 200' UNIT HYDROGRAPH EXHIBIT UNDEVELOPED CONDITION 4.1.p Packet Pg. 1346 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1584
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1347 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1585 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1348 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1586 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1349 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1587 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1350 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1588 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1351 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1589 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1352 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1590 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1353 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1591 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.p
Packet Pg. 1354 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1592 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 177 9 33 177 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 11 12 13 14 1 15 16 17 18 11 16 TR 31037 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 CITY OF SAN JACINTO SEAL DIG ALERT FOR W.O. SCALE BENCHMARK: DATE DATE CITY APPR. CHECKED BY: BY MARK ENGINEER REVISIONS DRAWN BY: DATE DESIGNED BY: SHEET NO. FILE NO. 1 PREPARED BY: DATE R.C.E. NO. Park City, UT 84098, 5133 Cove Canyon Dr, #302 OF 4 SHEETS Hemet, CA. 92544, 41555 E Florida Ave., Suite G, Phone (951)658-1727 Fax (951)658-9347 CIVIL ENGINEERING BWA BLAINE A. WOMER Boise, ID, 83706, 4355 W Emerald Street, St. 145, Phone (208)593-7555 1" = 200' DECEMBER, 2021 LAB MILL CREEK, LLC TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38203 UNIT HYDROGRAPH EXHIBIT DEVELOPED CONDITION 0 200 400 600 1" = 150 4.1.p Packet Pg. 1355 Attachment: Appendix F2 - Preliminary Hydrology Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1593
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

APPENDIX H
Public Services/Utilities Correspondence

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 1356 Attachment: Appendix H - Public Services Utilities Correspondence (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1594 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 1357 Attachment: Appendix H - Public Services Utilities Correspondence (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1595 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Biological, Regulatory & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700

MCLEISH RANCH RESIDENTIAL PROJECT

FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES QUESTIONNAIRE
Please complete the information in the table below.

Riverside County Fire Department
Address: 2300 Market St. #150 Riverside, CA 92501
Name/Title: Adria Reinertson, Deputy Fire Marshal
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: 951-955-5272
Date: 6/24/2022
Please respond to the following questions providing as much information as possible (necessary to evaluate potential impacts).

1. Please indicate the equipment, personnel, and emergency medical services available at each station.

Project Area Fire Stations
Station
Number Address Distance from Site Staffing/Equipment
25 132 South San Jacinto Avenue

2.8 miles (1) Type 1 Engine, 3 personnel
(1) Medic Squad, 2 personnel
78 2450 Cottonwood Avenue

3.2 miles (1) Type 1 Engine, 3 personnel
(1) Medic Squad, 2 personnel

2. Please identify the amount of service calls to each station during 2021.

Station 25 – 4,392 calls
Station 78 – 2,455 calls

3. Does your agency have an established target response time? 4-minute drive time goal

4. What is the current actual response time to the project area from each station? Station 25 – 7 minutes
Station 78 – 7 minutes

5. Are current staff levels and facilities adequate or deficient to serve the proposed project? See response to item 6 and 7.

6. Do you anticipate that project implementation would result in the need for physical additions to your agency (i.e., construction of new fire stations)?
The project will contribute to a cumulative negative impact on the ability to provide emergency services.

7. Please indicate any assessment fees required for new developments.

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 1358 Attachment: Appendix H - Public Services Utilities Correspondence (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1596 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

VCS Environmental provides CEQA/NEPA, Biological, Regulatory & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 In reference to this development, applicant will be required to pay Development Impact Fees as required by the City.

8. Do you anticipate that compliance with City Fire Code requirements and payment of required fees and taxes provided by new developments associated with the proposed project will adequately mitigate the expected increase in fire and emergency medical service demand? If not, do you have any required or recommended mitigation measures to reduce impacts to less than significant? The development will be required to form a Community Funding District to help sustain current and future fire protection and emergency medical capabilities.

9. Are there any plans for facility expansion or new facilities. Where does your agency acquire funding for new facilities?
We continually evaluate the need for facility expansion or new facilities. Funding comes from a variety of sources including general fund, development impact fees, development agreements, etc.

10. Please indicate the present ISO rates throughout the City and any fire hazard impacts. Will the ISO rating remain the same with the implementation of the proposed project? The proposed project is located within ISO Class 3. Yes

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 1359 Attachment: Appendix H - Public Services Utilities Correspondence (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1597 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) VCS Environm ental provides CEQA/N EPA, Biological, Regulatory & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700

M CL EISH R AN CH R ESI DEN TI A L PR OJECT

SCHOOL FACILITIES QUESTION N AIRE
Please complete the information in the table below.

San Jacinto Unified School District
Address: 2045 S San Jacinto Ave, San Jacinto Ca 92583
Name/Title: Alexander Adame / Facilities Planner
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: 951 929-7700 ext 4680
Date: 9/16/22
Please respond to the following questions providing as much information as possible (necessary to evaluate potential impacts).

1. What is the current enrollment of schools listed below and available seating capacity.

Project Area Schools
School Address Distance
from Site
2021/2022
Enrollment
Available
Seating
Capacity
De Anza Elementary 1089 De Anza Drive
San Jacinto, CA 92582

1.8 miles 640 1,086
Monte Vista Middle School 425 N Lyon Avenue
San Jacinto, CA 92582

2.0 miles 894 1,200
San Jacinto High School 500 Idyllwild Drive
San Jacinto, CA 92583

2.3 miles 2,646 3,699

2. What are the student generation rates used by the District to predict future student growth? We use the generation factors from our annual School Fee Needs Analysis

3. Does the District anticipate being able to accommodate for the population that may be generated by the proposed project?
Students generated by the proposed residential project would be served by the San Jacinto Unified School District. The District requests that the developer inform all potential property owners that the San Jacinto Unified School District cannot guarantee attendance within the current elementary or middle school boundaries for the students generated from this development. As such, individual students may be assigned to the school that has available seating for that grade level. The

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 1360 Attachment: Appendix H - Public Services Utilities Correspondence (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1598 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) VCS Environm ental provides CEQA/N EPA, Biological, Regulatory & Cultural Services 30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100, San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675 | 949.489.2700 District’s website will show tentative schools of attendance based on the property’s address. In addition, please be aware that in February 2010 the San Jacinto Unified School District Board of Trustees approved a reduction in transportation services. Transportation is only available for Elementary students who live over two miles from their school and for Secondary students who live over five miles from their school.

4. Are fees assessed against new developments for school–related services? If so, in what amount? School fees are required to be paid by the developer at the time of construction. Our current fees are $4.79 a sq ft

5. Are there any plans for facility expansion or new facilities, please provide as much detail as possible. Where does the District acquire funding for new facilities? We are currently working on plans to build a new elementary school (Rose Salgado Elementary) at 600 N Vernon Ave in San Jacinto

6. Please provide any additional comments that would pertain to impacts associated with the proposed project.

Traffic will be a challenge due to schools. Our Monte Vista Middle School is down the street with Record and DeAnza Elementary close by as well.

4.1.q
Packet Pg. 1361 Attachment: Appendix H - Public Services Utilities Correspondence (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1599 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

APPENDIX I
Traffic Impact Study

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1362 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1600 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1363 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1601 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1364 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1602 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) RK17386
JN: 2389-2021-06

MCLEISH RANCH RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
(TTM 38203)

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY
City of San Jacinto, California
Prepared for:

VCS ENVIRONMENTAL
30900 Rancho Viejo Road, Suite 100
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Justin Tucker, P.E.

Nhi Ly, E.I.T.

June 1, 2022

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1365 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1603 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1-1

1.1 Purpose of Report & Study Objectives 1-1

1.2 Site Location & Project Description 1-1

1.3 Traffic Study Area & Analysis Scenarios 1-2

2.0 Analysis Methodology, Performance Criteria &
Thresholds of Improvement Requirement ............................................ 2-1

2.1 Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Analysis Methodology 2-1

2.1.1 HCM (6TH Edition) Methodology 2-2

2.1.2 Analysis Parameters 2-3

2.2 Level of Service Performance Criteria & Thresholds of Improvement Requirement 2-3

2.2.1 City of San Jacinto 2-4

2.2.2 County of Riverside 2-5

2.2.3 City of Hemet 2-5

2.2.4 Caltrans 2-5

3.0 Existing Traffic Volumes & Circulation System ..................................... 3-1

3.1 Existing Traffic Controls & Intersection Geometrics 3-1

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes 3-1

3.3 City of San Jacinto Circulation Element 3-1

4.0 Projected & Future Traffic Volumes ...................................................... 4-1

4.1 Project Traffic Conditions 4-1

4.1.1 Project Trip Generation 4-1

4.1.2 Project-Specific Improvements 4-1

4.1.3 Project Trip Distribution & Assignment 4-2

4.1.4 Modal Split 4-2

4.1.5 Project Peak Hour Volumes 4-2

4.2 Background Traffic 4-3

4.2.1 Method of Projection 4-3

4.2.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes 4-3

4.3 Background Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-4

4.4 Background With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes 4-4

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1366 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1604 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Table of Contents
Section Page

5.0 Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS Analysis ........................................... 5-1

5.1 Existing Conditions Level of Service 5-1

5.2 Project Opening Year (2024) Without Project Conditions Level of Service 5-2

5.3 Project Opening Year (2024) With Project Conditions Level of Service 5-3

5.4 Project Fair-Share Contribution and Funding Sources 5-6

6.0 CA MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis ........................................... 6-1

7.0 CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis......................................... 7-1

8.0 Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations ......................................... 8-1

8.1 Traffic Study Area & Analysis Scenarios 8-1

8.2 Trip Generation Summary 8-2

8.3 Project Specific Improvements 8-2

8.4 Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS Analysis Summary 8-3

8.5 Project Fair-Share Analysis 8-4

8.6 CA MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis 8-5

8.7 CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Summary 8-6

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1367 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1605 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) List of Attachments
Exhibits
Location Map ........................................................................................................... 1-1 Site Plan ................................................................................................................... 1-2 Existing Lane Geometry and Traffic Controls .............................................................. 3-1 Existing Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................ 3-2 City of San Jacinto General Plan Roadway Classifications ........................................... 3-3 City of San Jacinto General Plan Roadway Cross-Sections ........................................... 3-4 Project Specific Improvements .................................................................................. 4-1 Project Trip Distribution ........................................................................................... 4-2 Project Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................. 4-3 Cumulative Projects Location Map ............................................................................. 4-4 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes .......................................................................... 4-5 Background (2027) Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes ................................ 4-6 Background (2027) With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes ..................................... 4-7 Recommended Improvements ................................................................................... 5-1

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1368 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1606 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) List of Attachments (continued)
Tables
ITE Trip Generation Rates .......................................................................................... 4-1 Proposed Project Trip Generation .............................................................................. 4-2 Cumulative Projects Trip Generation .......................................................................... 4-3 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary for Existing Conditions .............................. 5-1 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary for Background (2027) Without Project Conditions ................................................................................................................ 5-2 Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary for Background (2027) With Project Conditions ............................................................................................ 5-3 VMT Screening Analysis ............................................................................................ 6-1

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1369 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1607 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) List of Attachments (continued)
Appendices
Scope of Work .......................................................................................................... A Traffic Count Worksheets .......................................................................................... B Existing Conditions Intersection Analysis Worksheets ................................................. C Background (2027) Without Project Conditions Intersection Analysis Worksheets ...... D Background (2027) With Project Conditions Intersection Analysis Worksheets ............ E Background (2027) With Project With Improvements Conditions Intersection Analysis Worksheets .............................................................................................................. F CA MUTCD Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant Worksheets .......................................... G VMT Screening Analysis Worksheets .......................................................................... H

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1370 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1608 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 1-1

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Purpose of Report & Study Objectives
The purpose of this traffic impact study is to evaluate the development of the proposed McLeish Ranch Residential project (TTM 38203), hereinafter referred to as “Project”, from a traffic and circulation standpoint and to determine whether the project will have a significant traffic impact.

This traffic study has been conducted pursuant to the City of San Jacinto Traffic Impact Guidelines for Vehicles Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020 (San Jacinto TIA Guidelines); County of Riverside Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service Vehicle Miles Traveled, dated December 2020 (County Guidelines); and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements.

This study is prepared in accordance with the scope of work that has been approved by the City of San Jacinto staff, which is contained in Appendix A.

1.2 Site Location & Project Description
The proposed McLeish Ranch Residential Project (TTM 38203) is currently an approximately 97-acre vacant site located west of Lyon Avenue, southwest of Ramona Boulevard, east of Sanderson Avenue, and north of the San Jacinto Reservoir, in the City of San Jacinto, CA.

The project consists of constructing 424 single-family residential dwelling units.

Access for the project is planned via the following:
 The project proposes to construct the 4th leg (west leg) of the intersection of Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive which will provide access to the eastern portion of the project site. With the construction of the west leg, the intersection of Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive will operate as a 4-leg all-way stop-controlled intersection;  The existing Ranch View Lane terminus located on the northwest portion of the project site; and
 A future access point to the project site may be provided via an extension of De Anza Drive from Sanderson Avenue to the proposed De Anza Drive terminus located

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1371 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1609 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 1-2
on the western border of the site. This extension of De Anza Drive will not be built with the construction of the project but may be built in the future with other development. However, for the purposes of this traffic analysis, this future extension of De Anza Drive has not been included.

The project is planned to open in 2027 and will be evaluated in one (1) single phase.

Exhibit 1-1 shows the location of the proposed project. Exhibit 1-2 shows the proposed project’s site plan.

1.3 Traffic Study Area & Analysis Scenarios
Exhibit 1-1 illustrates the project’s site location map and traffic analysis study area. The study area consists of the following fourteen (14) intersections listed below. The jurisdiction where each study intersection is located is also identified. # North-South Street East-West Street Jurisdiction

1. Warren Avenue Ramona Expressway City of San Jacinto / County of Riverside

2. Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) Ramona Expressway City of San Jacinto / County of Riverside / Caltrans

3. Sanderson Avenue Ramona Boulevard City of San Jacinto

4. Ranch View Lane Ramona Boulevard City of San Jacinto

5. Lyon Avenue Ramona Expressway (SR-79) City of San Jacinto / Caltrans

6. Lyon Avenue Ramona Boulevard City of San Jacinto

7. Lyon Avenue De Anza Drive City of San Jacinto

8. State Street (SR-79) Ramona Expressway (SR-79) City of San Jacinto / Caltrans

9. State Street (SR-79) Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) City of San Jacinto / Caltrans

10. Tiger Lane Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) City of San Jacinto / Caltrans

11. Lyon Avenue Cottonwood Avenue City of San Jacinto

12. San Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) / Main Street City of San Jacinto / Caltrans

13. Lyon Avenue Esplanade Avenue City of San Jacinto / City of Hemet

14. Lyon Avenue Florida Avenue (SR-74) City of Hemet / Caltrans

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1372 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1610 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 1-3
The analysis evaluates traffic conditions of the fourteen (14) study intersections for the following scenarios during the weekday AM (7:00 AM – 9:00 AM) and weekday PM (4:00 PM – 6:00 PM) peak periods, in accordance with the applicable jurisdictional traffic impact analysis guidelines:
 Existing Conditions;
 Background Without Project Conditions – Existing Plus Ambient Growth (2% per year to Opening Year 2027) Plus Cumulative Projects; and  Background Conditions With Project Conditions - Existing Plus Ambient Growth (2% per year to Opening Year 2027) Plus Cumulative Projects Plus Project.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1373 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1611 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1374 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1612 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1375
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1613
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative 2-1

2.0 Analysis Methodologies, Performance Criteria, and
Thresholds of Significance
This section of the report presents the methodologies used to perform the traffic analyses summarized in this report in accordance with the City of San Jacinto, as well as other adjacent jurisdictions. This section also discusses the agency-established applicable performance criteria and thresholds of significance for the study facilities.

2.1 Study Intersection Peak Hour Level of Service Analysis Methodology In accordance with the City of San Jacinto Traffic Impact Guidelines for Vehicles Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020 (San Jacinto TIA Guidelines) and the County of Riverside Transportation Analysis Guidelines for Level of Service Vehicle Miles Traveled, dated December 2020 (County Guidelines), the Highway Capacity Manual Sixth Edition (HCM 6) is utilized as the technical guide in the evaluation of traffic operations.

The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative measure which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of factors such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate LOS (Level of Service) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted.

The definitions of level of service for interrupted flow (flow regulated by the existence of traffic control devices) are:
 LOS A (Free Flow / Insignificant Delays) describes traffic operations in which progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is extremely short.

Generally, LOS A operations for signalized intersections tend to result in most vehicles arriving during the green phase and traveling through the intersection without stopping.
 LOS B (Stable Operation / Minimal Delays) describes traffic operations in which progression slightly diminishes but is still considered highly favorable and the cycle length is short. Vehicles stop more often causing a marginal increase in average delay.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1376 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1614 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 2-2
 LOS C (Stable Operation / Acceptable Delays) describes traffic operations in which progression is favorable and the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear. Many vehicles still past through the intersection but a significant number of vehicles are stopping. Average delay is fair.
 LOS D (Approaching Unstable / Tolerable Delays)describes traffic operations in which progression is ineffective and/or cycle length is long. Considerable amount of vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. Average delay is adequate.  LOS E (Unstable Operation / Significant Delays) describes traffic operations in which progression is unfavorable and the cycle length is exceedingly long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. Average delay is high.
 LOS F (Forced Flow / Excessive Delays) describes traffic operations in which progression is extremely poor and the cycle length is extremely long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Average delay is vast.

2.1.1 HCM (6th Edition) Methodology
Level of service is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersection along a roadway. The Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM 6) expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for various intersection approaches. The HCM 6 uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The levels of service determined in this study are calculated using the HCM 6 methodology.

For signalized intersections, average control delay per vehicle is used to determine the level of service. Levels of service at signalized study intersections have been evaluated using the HCM 6 intersection analysis program.

For all-way stop-controlled intersections, average control delay per vehicle is used to determine the level of service.

For intersections with stop control on the minor approach only, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the free-flow traffic movement of the major street, and the level of service is determined based on the worst individual movement on the stop-controlled minor approach or movements sharing a single lane on

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1377 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1615 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 2-3
Table 2-1
HCM Intersection LOS & Delay Ranges
LOS
Average Control Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds)
Signalized Unsignalized
A 0.00 - 10.00 0.00 - 10.00
B 10.01 - 20.00 10.01 - 15.00
C 20.01 - 35.00 15.01 - 25.00
D 35.01 - 55.00 25.01 - 35.00
E 55.01 - 80.00 35.01 - 50.00
F >80.00 >50.00

2.1.2 Analysis Parameters
For this study, the HCM level of service grades will be determined utilizing the HCM 6 methodology and the PTV Vistro analysis software. All analysis parameters utilized in this analysis are in accordance with the City of San Jacinto TIA Guidelines, City of Hemet Guidelines, and County of Riverside TIA Guidelines. Existing peak hour factors have been calculated based upon the manual turning movement counts collected at the study area intersections.

2.2 LOS Performance Criteria & Thresholds for Requiring LOS Improvements The fourteen (14) key study intersections span over the following jurisdictions:
 City of San Jacinto;
 County of Riverside;
 City of Hemet; and
 Caltrans.

Hence, this study evaluates the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed project for each study intersection based on the performance criteria and thresholds of significance set forth by the respective jurisdiction(s).

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1378 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1616 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 2-4

2.2.1 City of San Jacinto
Per the City of San Jacinto TIA Guidelines, the following criteria shall be used in determining whether the addition of project traffic should be considered to have significant traffic impacts. Furthermore, feasible measures must be identified to mitigate such traffic impacts.

Signalized Intersections:
 Any signalized study intersection operating at an acceptable LOS D or better without project traffic in which the addition of project traffic causes the intersection to degrade to a LOS E or F shall identify improve operations to LOS D or better  Any signalized study intersection that is operating at LOS E or F without project traffic where the project increases delay by 5.0 or more seconds shall identify improvements to offset the increase in delay.

Unsignalized Intersections:
a. The addition of project related traffic causes the intersection to degrade from an acceptable LOS D or better to LOS E or F,
OR
b. The projects adds 5.0 seconds or more of delay to an intersection that is already projected to operate without project traffic at a LOS E or F, AND
c. The intersection meets the peak hour traffic signal warrant after the addition of project traffic.

If the conditions above are satisfied, the improvements should be identified that achieve the following:
 LOS D or better for case a) above or to pre-project LOS and delay for case b) above.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1379 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1617 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 2-5

2.2.2 County of Riverside
According to the Riverside County General Plan, Section C 2.1, the following countywide target Levels of Service shall be maintained:
 LOS “C” shall apply to all development proposals in any area of the Riverside County not located within the boundaries of an Area Plan, as well those areas located within the following Area Plans: REMAP, Eastern Coachella Valley, Desert Center, Palo Verde Valley, and those non-Community Development areas of the Elsinore, Lake Mathews/ Woodcrest, Mead Valley and Temescal Canyon Area Plans.  LOS “D” shall apply to all development proposals located within any of the following Area Plans: Eastvale, Jurupa, Highgrove, Reche Canyon/Badlands, Lakeview/Nuevo, Sun City/Menifee Valley, Harvest Valley/Winchester, Southwest Area, The Pass, San Jacinto Valley, Western Coachella Valley and those Community Development Areas of the Elsinore, Lake Mathews/Woodcrest, Mead Valley and Temescal Canyon Area Plans.
 LOS “E” may be allowed by the Board of Supervisors within designated areas where transit-oriented development and walkable communities are proposed.

Based on the above-mentioned level of service and impact criteria, LOS D is the minimum acceptable LOS at the applicable key study intersections. As such, operational improvements would be required when existing traffic conditions exceed General Plan target LOS; when project traffic, when added to existing traffic, will deteriorate the LOS to below the target LOS; or when cumulative traffic exceeds the target LOS.

2.2.3 City of Hemet
Per the City of Hemet General Plan, Section 4.4.1, the City of Hemet has established LOS D as the lowest acceptable LOS for peak-hour intersection movements. The City has also established additional thresholds for project impacts that go beyond acceptable operational LOS to address direct project impacts on roadway capacity. For purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), projects that increase V/C by .01 or more on affected roadway segments at intersections already experiencing or projected to experience LOS E or F conditions are considered to create potentially significant impacts and would require level of service improvements.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1380 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1618 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 2-6

2.2.4 Caltrans
Caltrans follows the guidance and analysis methodologies identified in the Caltrans Vehicles Miles Traveled-Focused Transportation Impact Study Guide, dated May 2020.

Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.3, VMT is now the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. Caltrans’ primary review focus for land use project impacts is now the VMT metric.

Since Caltrans no longer has established performance criteria for intersection LOS operations, study intersections under the jurisdiction of Caltrans will be examined under the performance criteria and thresholds of significance set forth by the applicable jurisdiction.

Given the LOS performance criteria and thresholds described above, this analysis utilizes the most constrained minimum acceptable LOS applicable to each study intersection. As such, the minimum acceptable LOS for all fourteen (14) key study intersections is LOS D.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1381 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1619 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 3-1

3.0 Circulation System & Existing Traffic Volumes
This section provides a discussion of existing study area conditions and traffic volumes.

3.1 Existing Traffic Controls & Intersection Geometrics Exhibit 3-1 identifies the existing roadway conditions for the study area roadways. The number of through traffic lanes for existing roadways and the existing intersection controls are identified. The type of traffic control and number of lanes at an intersection are key inputs for the calculation of level of service.

3.2 Existing Traffic Volumes
Existing conditions intersection level of service calculations are based upon manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts taken in March 2022 during typical weekday conditions. The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes were determined by counting the two-hour peak period between 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM, respectively, and using the highest hour within each two-hour peak period. The traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix B.

Existing traffic volumes for the study area intersections are shown on Exhibit 3-2.

3.3 City of San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Element The City of San Jacinto General Plan Circulation Map is shown on Exhibit 3-3. The City of San Jacinto General Plan Typical Roadway Cross-Sections are shown on Exhibit 3-4.

The ultimate buildout General Plan classifications for the roadway segments of the study intersections that appear as a major route or is part of a highway system that serves as principal network for through traffic are as follows:
 Warren Road – Arterial Highway (4 lanes, 122 feet right-of-way);  Sanderson Avenue – Urban Arterial Highway (6 lanes, 146 feet right-of-way);  Ramona Expressway (East of Sanderson Avenue) – Limited Access Conventional Highway (6 lanes, 184 feet right-of-way);

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1382 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1620 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 3-2
 Ramona Expressway (West of Sanderson Avenue) – Freeway  Lyon Avenue – Major Highway (4 lanes, 112 feet right-of-way);  Ramona Boulevard – Secondary Highway (4 lanes, 100 feet right-of-way);  State Street – Major Highway (4 lanes, 112 feet right-of-way);  Esplanade Avenue – Major Highway (4 lanes, 112 feet right-of-way); and  San Jacinto Avenue (South of Main Street) – Major Highway (4 lanes, 112 feet rightof-way).  San Jacinto Avenue (North of Main Street) – Secondary Highway (4 lanes, 100 feet right-of-way).

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1383 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1621 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1384
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1622
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1385
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1623
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1386
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1624
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1387 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1625 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 4-1

4.0 Projected & Future Traffic Volumes
This section provides a discussion on methodologies utilized to derive future traffic volumes for the study area.

4.1 Project Traffic Conditions

4.1.1 Project Trip Generation
Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land uses that have been planned for this development.

Trip generation rates for the proposed development are shown in Table 4-1 and are from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021). This publication provides a comprehensive evaluation of trip generation rates for a variety of land uses.

Utilizing the trip generation rates from Table 4-1, Table 4-2 summarizes the daily and peak hour trip generation for weekday conditions for the proposed project.

As shown in Table 4-2, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 3,998 daily trips which include approximately 297 AM peak hour trips and approximately 398 PM peak hour trips.

4.1.2 Project-Specific Improvements
The project will construct the west leg of the existing intersection of Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive (i.e. key study intersection #7) in order to provide access to the eastern portion of the project site. The westbound approach along De Anza Drive is proposed to convert the exclusive westbound right-turn lane into a shared through/right-tun lane. The proposed west leg (i.e. 4th leg of existing intersection) is proposed to provide one (1) exclusive eastbound left-turn lane and one (1) shared through/right-turn lane. Appropriate signage and striping should be installed to maintain all-way stop control. These project-specific improvements are subject to approval by the City of San Jacinto.

The project-specific improvements as described above are illustrated in Exhibit 4-1.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1388 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1626 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 4-2

4.1.3 Project Trip Distribution & Assignment
Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. Trip distribution is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of residential, employment and recreational opportunities, and the proximity to the regional freeway system. The directional orientation of traffic was determined by evaluating existing and proposed land uses, highways within the community, and existing traffic volumes.

The assignment of traffic from the project site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site's trip generation, trip distribution, existing and proposed arterial highways, and local street systems, which would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the site.

Exhibit 4-2 shows the forecast trip distribution for the proposed project.

4.1.4 Modal Split
Modal split denotes the proportion of traffic generated by a project that would use any of the transportation modes, namely buses, cars, bicycles, motorcycles, trains, carpools, etc. The traffic-reducing potential of public transit and other modes is significant. However, the traffic projections in this study are conservative in that public transit and alternative transportation may be able to reduce the traffic volumes, but no modal split reduction is applied to the projections. With the implementation of transit service and provision of alternative transportation ideas and incentives, the automobile traffic demand can be reduced significantly.

4.1.5 Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes
Project peak hour traffic volumes have been calculated throughout the study area.

The project’s AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-3.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1389 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1627 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 4-3

4.2 Background Traffic

4.2.1 Method of Projection
To assess future traffic conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic and area-wide growth. As directed by City staff, to account for area-wide/ambient growth in the study area, a linear annual growth rate of two percent (2%) per year has been applied to the existing (2022) traffic volumes over a five-year period for project opening year 2027 conditions (i.e. 10% total growth).

4.2.2 Cumulative Projects Traffic Volumes
Information on future projects in the vicinity of the study area has been provided by City of San Jacinto and City of Hemet staff for inclusion in this analysis and is shown in Table 4-3.

Table 4-3 shows the land uses, and daily and peak hour trip generation for the nearby cumulative projects provided by the public agencies.

A location map of the cumulative projects is shown on Exhibit 4-4.

Cumulative projects traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-5.

In reality, some of the cumulative projects may be downsized or may not be developed by the project opening year (2027). In addition, many of the cumulative projects have been or will be subject to a variety of mitigation measures that will reduce the potential environmental impacts associated with those projects.

However, those mitigation measures have not been taken into account in projecting the environmental impact of the related projects.

Therefore, the cumulative analyses set forth below are conservative and could result in greater impacts than actually anticipated. Additionally, the analysis utilizes a linear annual growth rate of two percent (2%) per year for project opening year (2027) conditions which would already capture and account for most projects in the area. The growth rate methodology is considered conservative since it is applied to all movements at all study intersections.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1390 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1628 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 4-4

4.3 Background (2027) Without Project Conditions Traffic Volumes Background (2027) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes consist of five (5) years of linear annual growth on top of existing (2022) traffic volumes at two percent (2%) per year (i.e. 10% total growth), plus traffic generated by the cumulative projects.

Background (2027) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-6.

4.4 Background (2027) With Project Conditions Traffic Volumes Background (2027) With Project Conditions traffic volumes consist five (5) years of linear annual growth on top of existing (2022) traffic volumes at two percent (2%) per year (i.e. 10% total growth), plus traffic generated by the cumulative projects and traffic generated by the proposed project.

Background (2027) With Project Conditions traffic volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-7.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1391 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1629 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing 210 DU 0.18 0.52 0.70 0.59 0.35 0.94 9.43 1 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021).2 DU = Dwelling Units.

Table 4-1
ITE Trip Generation Rates1
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Land Use Units Daily 2 ITE Code
j:\rktables\RK17386TB.xls
JN: 2389-2021-06

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1392
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1630
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing (210) 424 DU 77 220 297 251 147 398 3,998 1 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition, 2021).

Daily
2 DU = Dwelling Units.

Table 4-2
Project Trip Generation1
Land Use (ITE Code) Quantity Units2
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
j:\rktables\RK17386TB.xls
JN: 2389-2021-06

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1393
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1631
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1394
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1632
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1395 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1633 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1396
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1634
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1397
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1635
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative In Out Total In Out Total
SJ1 City of San Jacinto P21-106 / APN(s): 430-100-002 Marijuana Cultivation and Processing Facility 236 TSF 152 11 163 42 109 151 1,511 152 11 163 42 109 151 1,511
SJ2 City of San Jacinto P22-029 / APN: 430-130-079 Marijuana Cultivation and Processing Facility 2,858 TSF 1,834 138 1,972 512 1,317 1,829 18,291 SJ3 City of San Jacinto P21-091 / APN: 432-030-012 Single Family Detached Housing 215 DU 39 112 151 127 75 202 2,027 1,873 250 2,123 639 1,392 2,031 20,318
SJ4 City of San Jacinto P21-010 / APN(s): 436-040-006, 436- 040-008, & 436-030-001 Single Family Detached Housing 138 DU 25 72 97 82 48 130 1,301 25 72 97 82 48 130 1,301
SJ5 City of San Jacinto P21-071 / APN: 436-070-006-018 --3 -- -- 76 76 152 94 96 190 1,870 76 76 152 94 96 190 1,870
SJ6 City of San Jacinto P21-108 / APN: 434-080-036 Coffee/Donut Shop With Drive-Through Window 0.95 TSF 21 20 41 13 15 28 380 21 20 41 13 15 28 380
SJ7 City of San Jacinto P22-004 / APN(s): 433-070-030, 433- 070-050, & 434-180-007 --4 -- -- 31 83 114 97 60 157 1,610 31 83 114 97 60 157 1,610
SJ8 City of San Jacinto P20-011 / APN(s): 436-170-018, 436- 170-019, and 436-170-020 --5 96 DU 16 49 65 55 33 88 889 SJ9 City of San Jacinto P21-030 / APN(s):432-130-008, 432- 130-009, &432-130-001 Marijuana Cultivation and Processing Facility 2,636 TSF 1,692 127 1,819 472 1,215 1,687 16,870 SJ10 City of San Jacinto P20-087 / APN(s): 432-130-006/7 Single Family Detached Housing 191 DU 35 99 134 113 67 180 1,801 SJ11 City of San Jacinto P21-127 / APN: 432-120-005 Marijuana Cultivation and Processing Facility 151 TSF 97 7 104 27 70 97 968 1,840 282 2,122 667 1,385 2,052 20,528
SJ12 City of San Jacinto P21-076 / APN(s): 436-280-
011 012 013 & 014 Single Family Detached Housing 135 DU 25 70 95 80 47 127 1,273 25 70 95 80 47 127 1,273
SJ13 City of San Jacinto P22-020 / APN: 436-360-011 --6 -- -- 99 98 197 119 102 221 2,908 SJ14 City of San Jacinto P22-023 / APN: 436-490-011 Single Family Detached Housing 76 DU 14 39 53 45 26 71 717 113 137 250 164 128 292 3,625
SJ15 City of San Jacinto P22-035 / APN: 435-030-017 Small Office Building 2.4 TSF 3 1 4 2 3 5 35 SJ16 City of San Jacinto P21-071 / APN: 435-055-042 Marijuana Cultivation and Processing Facility 12.6 TSF 8 1 9 2 6 8 81 11 2 13 4 9 13 116
SJ17 City of San Jacinto
CZ-17-05/CUP-17-09/MUPs 17-09, 17-
10, 17-11/SP&DR-17-17/Var-17-05
/APN(s): 433-160-024/-027/-028/-029/-
032/-033/-034.
--7 -- -- 157 145 302 145 144 289 4,445
157 145 302 145 144 289 4,445
SJ18 City of San Jacinto P20-022 / APN: 432-280-028 Variety Store 10 TSF 15 13 28 22 22 44 576 15 13 28 22 22 44 576
SJ19 City of San Jacinto P21-074 / APN:439-070-064 --8 -- TSF 13 8 21 16 19 35 379 SJ20 City of San Jacinto P20-011 / APN(s): 439-111-003-2 & 439-111-004-3 --9 8 TSF 75 74 149 117 103 220 2,935
SJ21 City of San Jacinto P20-052 / APN: 439-120-038 Gasoline / Service Station 16 VFP 30 31 61 48 48 96 2,064 118 113 231 181 170 351 5,378
H1 City of Hemet P21-079 / APN(s): 435-190-053 Charter School (K-12) 240 Students 101 98 199 11 20 31 355 101 98 199 11 20 31 355
4,558 1,372 5,930 2,241 3,645 5,886 63,286
2 DU = Dwelling Units.

TSF = Thousand Square Feet.

TAZ 14 Total
1 Cumulative Projects information provided by the City of San Jacinto Total Cumulative Projects Trip Generation
AM PM
TAZ 11
TAZ 11 Total
TAZ 14
TAZ 13
TAZ 13 Total
TAZ 12
TAZ 12 Total
TAZ 1
Table 4-3
Cumulative Projects Trip Generation1
ID No. Jurisdiction Project Name /
Case Number Land Use Quantity Units2
Peak Hour
Daily
TAZ 1 Total
TAZ 2
TAZ 2 Total
TAZ 3
TAZ 3 Total
TAZ 4
TAZ 4 Total
TAZ 5
TAZ 5 Total
TAZ 6
TAZ 1 Total
TAZ 10
TAZ 10 Total
TAZ 7
TAZ 7 Total
TAZ 8
TAZ 8 Total
TAZ 9
TAZ 9 Total
j:\rktables\RK17386TB.xls
JN: 2389-2021-06

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1398 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1636 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1399
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1637
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1400
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1638
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1401
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1639
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 5-1

5.0 Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS Analysis
This section of the report provides a discussion on the study intersection peak hour level of service (LOS) analysis and findings.

Based on the impact criteria above, improvements are identified for any key study intersections deemed to be impacted with the proposed Project. Based on the City of San Jacinto TIA Guidelines, the improvements will improve the impacted intersection to the levels described below:
 If a signalized intersection is operating at an acceptable LOS D or better without project traffic, and the addition of project traffic causes the intersection to degrade to an LOD E or F, improvements shall be identified to improve operations to acceptable LOS D or better.
 If a signalized intersection is already operating at an LOS E or F and the addition of project traffic causes delay to increase by 5.0 seconds or more, improvements shall be identified to improve operations to pre-project LOS and delay.  An unsignalized intersection would be subject to the same criteria listed above but would also need to meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant for “with project” scenarios to require operational improvement.

For impacted key study intersections located within the County of Riverside or the City of Hemet, improvements shall be identified to improve operations to acceptable LOS D or better.

5.1 Existing Conditions Level of Service
Existing Conditions LOS calculations for the study intersections are based upon the existing traffic volumes shown on Exhibit 3-2 and the existing geometry shown on Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-1, the fourteen (14) study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours for Existing Conditions, with the exception of the following study intersections, which are currently operating at a deficient LOS:

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1402 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1640 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 5-2
 Int #8 – State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only; and  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – AM peak hour only.

Detailed LOS analysis worksheets for Existing Conditions are contained in Appendix C.

5.2 Background (2027) Without Project Conditions Level of Service Background (2027) Without Project Conditions LOS calculations for the study intersections are shown in Table 5-2 and are based upon the Background (2027) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes shown on Exhibit 4-6 and the existing geometry shown on Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-2, the study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours for Background (2027) Without Project Conditions, with the exception of the following study intersections, which are currently operating at a deficient LOS:
 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only;  Int. #2 – Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) – AM and PM peak hours;
 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard – PM peak hour only;  Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive – AM peak hour only  Int #8 – State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only;  Int. #10 – Tiger Lane at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) – AM peak hour only;  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – AM and PM peak hours; and  Int. #12 – San Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) / Main Street – AM and PM peak hours.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1403 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1641 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 5-3
Detailed LOS analysis worksheets for Background (2027) Without Project Conditions are contained in Appendix D.

5.3 Background (2027) With Project Conditions Level of Service Background (2027) Without Project Conditions LOS calculations for the study intersections are also shown in Table 5-2 and are based upon the Background (2027) Without Project Conditions traffic volumes shown on Exhibit 4-7 and the project-specific improvements shown on Exhibit 3-1.

As shown in Table 5-2, the study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during the AM and PM peak hours for Background (2027) With Project Conditions with the exception of the following study intersections, which are currently operating at a deficient LOS:
 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only;  Int. #2 – Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) – AM and PM peak hours;
 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard – AM and PM peak hours;  Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive – AM and PM peak hours;  Int #8 – State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only;  Int. #10 – Tiger Lane at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) – AM peak hour only;  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – AM and PM peak hours; and  Int. #12 – San Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) / Main Street – AM and PM peak hours.

Although key study intersections #8, #10, and #12 are forecast to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the AM and/or PM peak hours under Year 2027 Background With Project Conditions, these intersections are not considered to be impacted per the impact

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1404 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1642 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 5-4
criteria specified in this report as the traffic associated with the project does not increase the delay by 5.0 seconds or more.

It should be noted, however, that key study intersections #1 and #2 are considered to be impacted despite not increasing the delay by 5.0 seconds or more since these key study intersections fall under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside and thus any increase in delay requires improvements if the General Plan target LOS is not met.

As such, the proposed project is required to contribute improvements only at study intersection #1, #2, #6, #7, and #11. The following recommended improvements have been identified:

Recommended Improvement #1 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway
Restripe and/or widen the southbound
approach of Warren Road to provide an
exclusive southbound left-turn lane. Modify
the traffic signal to provide protected leftturn phasing for all legs (i.e. 8-phase signal).

This intersection is identified as a TUMF
improvement and as such, the TUMF fee
payment would be considered a sufficient
project obligation to alleviate project
impacts.

Recommended Improvement #2 Int. #2: Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79)
Restripe and/or widen all approaches along
Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway
to provide a third through lane in each
direction. This would require restriping
and/or widening all departures to provide an
additional lane in each direction. This
intersection is identified as a TUMF
improvement and as such, the TUMF fee
payment would be considered a sufficient
project obligation to alleviate project
impacts.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1405 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1643 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 5-5
Recommended Improvement #3 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard
Restripe and/or widen the southbound
approach of Lyon Avenue to provide a
second southbound approach lane (i.e.
shared southbound through/right-turn
lane). This would require restriping the
southbound departure along Lyon Avenue
to provide a second southbound departure
lane. The project is responsible for a 12.6%
fair share contribution, as further detailed in
Section 5.4 below.

Recommended Improvement #4 Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive Restripe and/or widen the northbound and
southbound approaches of Lyon Avenue to
provide a second approach lane in each
direction. This would require restriping the
northbound and southbound departures
along Lyon Avenue to provide a second
departure lane in each direction. The project
is responsible for a 44.5% fair share
contribution, as further detailed in Section

5.4 below.

Recommended Improvement #5 Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue
Install a traffic signal with permissive
phasing for all left-turn movements (i.e. 2-
phase signal). The peak hour traffic signal
warrant is met; see section 6.0 for more
detail. Installation of a traffic signal is an
identified fee type per the City of San
Jacinto Development Fee Schedule. As such,
the City DIF fee payment would be
considered a sufficient project obligation to
alleviate project impacts.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1406 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1644 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 5-6
Detailed LOS analysis worksheets for Background (2027) With Project Conditions are contained in Appendix E.

Detailed LOS analysis worksheets for Background (2027) With Project With Improvements Conditions are contained in Appendix F.

Recommended improvements for all scenarios are provided in Exhibit 5-1.

5.4 Project Fair-Share Contribution and Funding Sources Where there is a funding mechanism (fee program) for the recommended improvements, payment into the fee program would be considered a sufficient project obligation to alleviate project impacts. At study locations where the addition of project traffic creates a direct significant impact (i.e. existing with project conditions) and there is no funding mechanism in place, the project will be responsible for the implementation of the improvement. At locations where the project adds to a forecast deficiency (i.e. cumulative impact) and there is no funding mechanism in place, the project is responsible for a fairshare payment.

Fair-share contributions are based on project trip contributions relative to amount of overall growth from existing traffic conditions. Fair-share contributions percentages are provided in Table 5-3. Table 5-3 also identifies which study intersections/recommended improvements are eligible for applicable funding mechanisms.

As shown in Table 5-3, the project fair share percentages for Background With Project traffic conditions are listed below:
 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway – 4.4% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #2 – Sanderson Ave (SR-79) at Ramona Expy (SR-79) – 3.7% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard – 12.6% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive – 44.5% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – 19.1% (PM Peak Hour)

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1407 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1645 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

AM PM AM PM

1. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & County of Riverside D 23.0 49.8 C D2. TS HCM City of San Jacinto , County of Riverside, & Caltrans D 31.2 30.6 C C

3. TS HCM City of San Jacinto D 10.5 11.9 B B4. CSS HCM City of San Jacinto D 10.7 12.0 B B5. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 13.9 11.6 B B6. AWS HCM City of San Jacinto D 11.5 12.3 B B7. AWS HCM City of San Jacinto D 27.7 10.0 D B8. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 45.8 72.2 D E

9. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 35.8 34.4 D C

10. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 54.8 36.7 D D11. AWS HCM City of San Jacinto D 61.4 18.4 F D

12. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 49.1 45.0 D D13. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & City of Hemet D 22.8 24.5 C C14. TS HCM City of Hemet & Caltrans D 30.8 30.8 C C 1 CSS = Cross-Street StopAWS = All-Way Stop
2 Deficient operation shown in Bold.3 HCM Analysis Software: PTV Vistro, Version 2022.

Lyon Avenue at Ramona Expressway
Lyon Avenue at Esplande Avenue
San Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) / Main Street Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard
Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive
State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79)
TS = Traffic Signal
Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79)
Lyon Avenue at Florida Avenue (SR-74)
Sanderson Avenue at Ramona Boulevard
Ranch View Lane at Ramona Boulevard
Delay
(sec/veh)2,3
Warren Road at Ramona Expressway
State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79)
Tiger Lane at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79)
Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue
Table 5-1
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Existing Conditions
Intersection Traffic Control1 Jurisdiction
Level of
Service
Minimum
Acceptable
LOS
Methodology
j:\rktables\RK17386TB.xls
JN: 2389-2021-06

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1408
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1646
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM
TS HCM City of San Jacinto & County of Riverside D 31.8 255.1 C F 31.8 257.9 C F 0.0 2.8 No Yes TS HCM City of San Jacinto & County of Riverside D -- -- -- -- 32.9 46.9 C D -- -- -- -- TS HCM City of San Jacinto , County of Riverside, & Caltrans D 71.6 87.9 E F 80.1 92.8 F F 8.5 4.9 Yes Yes TS HCM City of San Jacinto , County of Riverside, & Caltrans D -- -- -- -- 47.8 48.2 D D -- -- -- --

3. TS HCM City of San Jacinto D 38.7 38.8 D D 44.6 46.9 D D 5.9 8.1 No No4. CSS HCM City of San Jacinto D 12.2 14.7 B B 13.1 16.0 B C 0.9 1.3 No No5. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 19.3 19.4 B B 21.7 22.4 C C 2.4 3.0 No No AWS HCM City of San Jacinto D 27.5 43.6 D E 37.0 62.7 E F 9.5 19.1 Yes Yes AWS HCM City of San Jacinto D -- -- -- -- 32.1 26.1 D D -- -- -- --AWS HCM City of San Jacinto D 137.7 17.4 F C 235.9 48.4 F E 98.2 31.0 Yes YesAWS HCM City of San Jacinto D -- -- -- -- 41.5 14.7 E B -- -- -- --

8. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 47.9 74.6 D E 48.5 77.4 D E 0.6 2.8 No No

9. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 41.3 39.0 D D 42.4 39.5 D D 1.1 0.5 No No

10. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 77.9 41.4 E D 78.8 41.5 E D 0.9 0.1 No No AWS HCM City of San Jacinto D 178.1 87.2 F F 205.3 125.5 F F 27.2 38.3 Yes Yes TS HCM City of San Jacinto D -- -- -- -- 32.8 19.9 C B -- -- -- --

12. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & Caltrans D 158.6 133.2 F F 158.8 134.5 F F 0.2 1.3 No No13. TS HCM City of San Jacinto & City of Hemet D 26.8 29.1 C C 28.3 31.3 C C 1.5 2.2 No No14. TS HCM City of Hemet & Caltrans D 31.2 35.6 C D 31.4 37.7 C D 0.2 2.1 No No Jurisdiction
Lyon Avenue at Esplande AvenueLyon Avenue at Florida Avenue (SR-74)Lyon Avenue at De Anza DriveState Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79)State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79)Tiger Lane at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) Level of Service Delay (sec/veh)2,3 Increase in Delay (2) - (1) Level of Service Ranch View Lane at Ramona BoulevardLyon Avenue at Ramona ExpresswayLyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard Delay
(sec/veh)2,3
Warren Road at Ramona Expressway
Table 5-2
Study Intersection LOS Analysis Summary
Background Conditions
Intersection Traffic Control1
Methodology Requires Improvement?
(2)
Background
With Project Conditions
Minimum
Acceptable
LOS
(1)
Background Without Project
Conditions

1.2.6. With ImprovementsWith ImprovementsWith Improvements Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79)Sanderson Avenue at Ramona Boulevard

7. With ImprovementsWith Improvements

11. Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood AvenueSan Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) / Main Street j:\rktables\RK17386TB.xls
JN: 2389-2021-06

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1409
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1647
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM

1. Warren Road at Ramona Expressway
Not Impacted
Under AM Peak
Hour
2,334
Not Impacted
Under AM Peak
Hour
3,705
Not Impacted
Under AM Peak
Hour
1,371
Not Impacted
Under AM Peak
Hour
60 Not Impacted
Under AM Peak
Hour

4.4%

2. Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) 3,750 4,902 6,955 8,176 3,205 3,274 90 120 2.8% 3.7%6. Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard 821 861 1,357 1,487 536 626 59 79 11.0% 12.6%7. Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive 860 635 1,479 1,349 619 714 238 318 38.4% 44.5%

11. Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue 1,397 1,103 2,062 1,829 665 726 104 139 15.6% 19.1% 1 Table 5-3
Project Fair-Share Contribution Summary1
Background With Project Conditions
Project Fair-Share Contribution represents the project's traffic contribution at each impacted study area intersection as a percentage of the overall growth in traffic for Background With Project Conditions.This table is for informational purposes only and is not tied to any mitigation.

Intersection
Existing Conditions Traffic Background With Project Conditions Traffic Growth in Traffic Project Traffic Project Fair-Share Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Payment
Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Payment
Project Fair-Share PaymentProject Fair-Share Payment
Development Impact
Fee Payment
Funding Source to Satisfy
Project Obligation
j:\rktables\RK17386TB.xls
JN: 2389-2021-06

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1410
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1648
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1411
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1649
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 6-1

6.0 CA MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
Per City of San Jacinto guidelines (as explained previously in Section 2.2.1), a traffic signal warrant is required at any unsignalized key study intersection where the addition of project causes the delay to increase by 5.0 or more seconds for an already deficient intersection.

An evaluation for signalization based on the peak hour signal warrants (i.e. Warrant #3) and procedures contained in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), 2014 Editions have been performed for the following three (3) unsignalized key study intersections:
 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard;
 Int #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive; and
 Int #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue.

Table 6-1 summarizes the results of the MUTCD peak hour traffic signal warrant analysis at the three (3) unsignalized key study intersections noted above for all analysis scenarios evaluated in this study.

Detailed CA MUTCD signal warrant analysis worksheets are included in Appendix G.

The following is a summary of the traffic signal warrant analysis:
 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard
o Peak Hour Warrants met for Background Conditions and Background with Project Conditions – AM and PM Peak Hours.
 Int #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive
o Peak Hour Warrants met for Background Conditions and Background with Project Conditions – AM Peak Hour Only.
 Int #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue.
o Peak Hour Warrants met for all scenarios – AM and PM Peak Hours.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1412 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1650 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

AM PM AM PM AM PM
Existing Conditions No No No No Yes Yes
Background Conditions Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes
Background With Project Conditions Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes

6. Lyon Avenue /
Ramona Boulevard

7. Lyon Avenue / De
Anza Drive

11. Lyon Avenue /
Cottonwood Avenue
Study Intersection
Table 6-1
MUTCD Peak Hour Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Summary Analysis Scenario
j:\rktables\RK17386TB.xls
JN: 2389-2021-06

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1413
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1651
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative 7-1

7.0 CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
In response to Senate Bill (SB) 743, the California Natural Resource Agency certified and adopted new CEQA Guidelines in December 2018 which now identify Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project's transportation impact under CEQA (§ 15064.3).

A key element of SB 743, signed in 2013, is the elimination of automobile delay and LOS as the sole basis for determining CEQA impacts. Pursuant to CEQA guidelines, Section 15064.3, VMT is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. However, SB 743 does not prevent a city of county from continuing to analyze delay or LOS as part of other plans (i.e. the general plan), studies, or ongoing network monitoring.

The City of San Jacinto has updated their transportation impact guidelines (i.e. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020) to provide recommendations in the form of thresholds of significance and methodology for identifying VMT related impacts. The proposed project is subject to a VMT analysis and will adhere to the recommendations and practices described in the City’s VMT Guidelines.

Per the City of San Jacinto’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020, a VMT analysis shall be conducted for land use projects as deemed necessary by the City and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the average VMT per service population (e.g. population but employment) compared to the subregion (WRCOG region). However, the following are three types of screening that the City may apply to effectively screen projects from project level assessment:
 Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
 Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening
 Step 3: Project Type Screening

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1414 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1652 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 7-2
Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening
The City’s TIA Guidelines indicate that residential projects located within a low VMTgenerating area may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary.

To identify if the project is in a low VMT-generating area, the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RIVCOM) was utilized through the Western Riverside County Council of Governments (WRCOG) VMT screening tool website to determine if the proposed project fulfills the Low VMT Area Screening criteria.

The results of the VMT screening analysis are summarized in Table 7-1. The WRCOG VMT Screening Tool printouts are provided in Appendix H.

Table 7-1
VMT Screening Analysis1
Project APN & TAZ Baseline Year OD VMT per Service Population APN: 436-080-001 & 436-080-002
TAZ: 2,141 2022 29.0
City of San Jacinto Threshold of Significance 33.6
Percent Difference (Project TAZ vs. Jurisdictional Threshold) -13.62% Potentially Significant Impact? No

1 Western Riverside County Council of Governments (WRCOG) VMT Screening Tool.

Website: https://fehrandpeers.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4e34ad3196464c8086c881189237b25c Based on the results of the WRCOG VMT Screening Tool, the proposed project’s TAZ VMT is quantified to be 29.0 VMT per service population, which is less than the City of San Jacinto Threshold of Significance of 33.6 VMT per service population. Hence, the proposed project satisfies the Low VMT Area Screening procedure.

The project may be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact under CEQA.

Thus, no further VMT analysis is required.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1415 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1653 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 8-1

8.0 Findings and Recommendations
The purpose of this traffic impact analysis is to evaluate the proposed McLeish Ranch Residential project (TTM 38203) from a traffic and circulation standpoint and determine whether the project will have a significant impact.

The currently vacant project site is located west of Lyon Avenue, southwest of Ramona Boulevard, east of Sanderson Avenue, and north of the San Jacinto Reservoir, in the City of San Jacinto, CA. The proposed project is planned to consist of the following land uses:
 424 single-family residential dwelling units.

The project is planned to be open in 2027 and will be evaluated in one (1) single phase.

8.1 Traffic Study Area & Analysis Scenarios
The traffic analysis evaluated the following study intersections

1. Warren Road at Ramona Expressway (City of San Jacinto/County of Riverside)

2. Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/County of Riverside/Caltrans)

3. Sanderson Avenue at Ramona Boulevard (City of San Jacinto)

4. Ranch View Lane at Ramona Boulevard (City of San Jacinto)

5. Lyon Avenue at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

6. Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard (City of San Jacinto)

7. Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive (City of San Jacinto)

8. State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

9. State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

10.Tiger Lane at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

11.Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue (City of San Jacinto)

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1416 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1654 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 8-2

12.San Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79)/Main Street (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

13.Lyon Avenue at Esplanade Avenue (City of San Jacinto/City of Hemet)

14.Lyon Avenue at Florida Avenue (SR-74) (City of Hemet/Caltrans) The analysis evaluates traffic conditions for the following study scenarios during the weekday AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and weekday PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) peak periods:
 Existing Conditions;
 Background Without Project Conditions; and
 Background With Project Conditions.

8.2 Trip Generation Summary
Based on the ITE trip generation rates, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 3,998 daily trips which include approximately 297 AM peak hour trips and approximately 398 PM peak hour trips.

8.3 Project Specific Improvements
As part of the project, the west leg of the existing intersection of Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive (i.e. key study intersection #7) shall be constructed with a roadway configuration of one (1) exclusive left-turn lane and one (1) shared through/right-turn lane as well as with the appropriate striping and signage.

The westbound approach along De Anza Drive is proposed to convert the exclusive westbound right-turn lane into a shared through/right-tun lane. The proposed west leg (i.e. 4th leg of existing intersection) is proposed to provide one (1) exclusive eastbound leftturn lane and one (1) shared through/right-turn lane. Appropriate signage and striping should be installed to maintain all-way stop control. These project-specific improvements are subject to approval by the City of San Jacinto

8.4 Study Intersection Peak Hour LOS Analysis Summary
For the Existing Conditions, all study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS D or better during the peak hours with the exception of the following study scenario:

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1417 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1655 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 8-3
 Int #8 – State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only; and  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – AM peak hour only.

While all other study intersections are forecast to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better for Background Without Project Conditions as well as the Background With Project Conditions; the following study intersections are forecast to operate at a deficient LOS:
 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only;  Int. #2 – Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) – AM and PM peak hours;
 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard – PM peak hour only;  Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive – AM peak hour only;  Int #8 – State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway – AM and PM peak hour only; and
 Int. #10 – Tiger Lane at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) – AM peak hour only;  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – AM and PM peak hours; and  Int. #12 – San Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) / Main Street – AM and PM peak hours.

As discussed in Section 5.0, operational improvements is only required for signalized study intersections when the addition of project-related traffic either degrades from an LOS D or better or and LOS E or F, or increases delay by 5 seconds or more when already operating at a deficient LOS in the pre-project conditions. An unsignalized intersection would be subject to the same criteria listed above but would also need to meet the peak hour traffic signal warrant for “with project” scenarios to require operational improvement.

The exception to said criteria are the study intersections that fall under the jurisdiction of County of Riverside (Intersection #1 and Intersection #2), which would require

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1418 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1656 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 8-4
improvements to be identified if the forecasted LOS exceeds the minimum acceptable LOS threshold.

Thus, the following study intersections have been identified for operational improvements in order to bring the project-related impacts to a level considered less than significant for the impacted “with project” analysis scenarios:
 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway – PM peak hour only;  Int. #2 – Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) – AM and PM peak hours;
 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard – AM and PM peak hours;  Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive – AM and PM peak hours;  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – AM and PM peak hours; and

8.5 Recommended Project Improvements
As shown in Section 5.3, the following intersection improvements are recommended for the deficient study intersections:
 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway
o Restripe and/or widen the southbound approach of Warren Road to provide an exclusive southbound left-turn lane. Modify the traffic signal to provide protected left-turn phasing for all legs (i.e. 8-phase signal).  Int. #2: Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) o Restripe and/or widen all approaches along Sanderson Avenue and Ramona Expressway to provide a third through lane in each direction. This would require restriping and/or widening all departures to provide an additional lane in each direction.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1419 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1657 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 8-5
 Int. #6: Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard
o Restripe and/or widen the northbound and southbound approaches of Lyon Avenue to provide a second approach lane in each direction. This would require restriping the northbound and southbound departures along Lyon Avenue to provide a second departure lane in each direction.  Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive
o Restripe and/or widen the northbound and southbound approaches of Lyon Avenue to provide a second approach lane in each direction. This would require restriping the northbound and southbound departures along Lyon Avenue to provide a second departure lane in each direction.  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue
o Install a traffic signal with permissive phasing for all left-turn movements (i.e. 2-phase signal). The peak hour traffic signal warrant is met; see section 6.0 for more detail.

8.6 Project Fair-Share Contribution
The project fair share percentages for Background With Project traffic conditions are listed below:
 Int. #1 – Warren Road at Ramona Expressway – 4.4% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #2 – Sanderson Ave (SR-79) at Ramona Expwy (SR-79) – 3.7% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard – 12.6% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive – 44.5% (PM Peak Hour)  Int. #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue – 19.1% (PM Peak Hour)

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1420 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1658 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 8-6

8.7 CA MUTCD Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
The following intersections have been evaluated for signalization based on the peak hour signal warrants and procedures contained in the California Manual on uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2014:
 Int. #6 – Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard;
 Int #7 – Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive; and
 Int #11 – Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue.

8.7 CEQA Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis Summary
Based on the results of the WRCOG VMT Screening Tool, the proposed project’s TAZ VMT is quantified to be 29.0 VMT per service population, which is less than the City of San Jacinto Threshold of Significance of 33.6 VMT per service population. Hence, the proposed project satisfies the Low VMT Area Screening procedure.

Based on the above, the proposed project may be presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT under CEQA, and a detailed VMT analysis is not required.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1421 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1659 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Appendix A
Scope of Work

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1422 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1660 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) /
McLeish Ranch Residential Project (TTM 38203)
w/o Lyon Ave, sw/o Ramona Blvd, e/o Sanderson Ave, n/o San Jacinto Reservoir 2027
424 single-family detached residential dwelling units
4000 Westerly Pl #280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949)474-0809

VCS ENVIRONMENTAL
30900 Rancho Viejo Rd #100
San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
(949)489-2700
ITE Trip Generation Manual, 11th Ed, 2021

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR)

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL) RK ENGINEERING GROUP,INC.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1423 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1661 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) /
77 251 147
220 297
398
xx
x
x
Project is located within a low VMT area based on
OD VMT Per Service Population.

Project exceeds 100 single family residential lots.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1424 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1662 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) /
15 35 35 15

NEW COUNTS
N/
A
-To be provided by the City.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1425 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1663 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 1 McLeish Ranch Residential Project (TTM 38203)
Traffic and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
Impact Study Scoping Agreement
March 16, 2022
The following provides information on the proposed project, summarizes the analysis scope, parameters, and assumptions for review and approval, and also includes request for information on items related to the study. The proposed scope of work is consistent with the criteria and parameters described in the City of San Jacinto’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020.

A. Project Description: The proposed McLeish Ranch Residential Project (TTM 38203) is currently an approximately 97-acre vacant site located west of Lyon Avenue, southwest of Ramona Boulevard, east of Sanderson Avenue, and north of the San Jacinto Reservoir, in the City of San Jacinto, CA.

The proposed project is planned to consist of the following land uses:
 424 single-family detached residential dwelling units.

Access for the project is planned via the following:
 The project proposes to construct the 4th leg (west leg) of the intersection of Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive which will provide access to the eastern portion of the project site. With the construction of the west leg, the intersection of Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive will operate as a 4-leg all-way stop-controlled intersection; and  The existing Ranch View Lane terminus located on the northwest portion of the project site.

The project is planned to open in 2027 and will be evaluated in one (1) single phase.

Exhibit A shows the location of the proposed project. Exhibit B shows the proposed site plan.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1426 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1664 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 2 B. Project Trip Generation: Trip generation represents the amount of traffic that is attracted and produced by a development.

Trip generation is typically estimated based on the trip generation rates from the latest Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. The latest and most recent version (11th Edition, 2021) ITE Manual has been utilized for this scoping agreement. This publication provides a comprehensive evaluation of trip generation rates for a variety of land uses.

Table 1 shows the ITE trip generation rates utilized for the trip generation analysis of the proposed project land uses.

Table 1
ITE Trip Generation Rates1

Land Use Units2 ITE Code
AM PM
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing DU 210 0.18 0.52 0.70 0.59 0.35 0.94 9.43

1 Source: 2021 ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) 2 DU = Dwelling Units
Table 2 shows the trip generation for the proposed project utilizing the trip generation rates shown in Table 1.

Table 2
Project Trip Generation1

Proposed Land Uses
Land Use (ITE Code) Quantity Units2
AM PM
Daily
In Out Total In Out Total
Single-Family Detached Housing (210) 424 DU 77 220 297 251 147 398 3,998 Total 77 220 297 251 147 398 3,998
1 Source: 2021 ITE Trip Generation Manual (11th Edition) 2 DU = Dwelling Units

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1427 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1665 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 3 As shown in Table 2, based on the ITE trip generation rates, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 3,998 daily trips which include approximately 297 AM peak hour trips and approximately 398 PM peak hour trips.

C. Project Trip Distribution: Exhibit C shows the trip distribution pattern for the proposed project.

D. Study Intersections: The analysis will evaluate the following fourteen (14) study intersections. The jurisdiction where each study intersection is located is also identified.

1. Warren Road at Ramona Expressway (City of San Jacinto/County of Riverside)

2. Sanderson Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/County of Riverside/Caltrans)

3. Sanderson Avenue at Ramona Boulevard (City of San Jacinto)

4. Ranch View Lane at Ramona Boulevard (City of San Jacinto)

5. Potter Road/Lyon Avenue at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

6. Lyon Avenue at Ramona Boulevard (City of San Jacinto)

7. Lyon Avenue at De Anza Drive (City of San Jacinto)

8. State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Expressway (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

9. State Street (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

10.Tiger Lane at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79) (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

11.Lyon Avenue at Cottonwood Avenue (City of San Jacinto)

12.San Jacinto Avenue (SR-79) at Ramona Boulevard (SR-79)/Main Street (City of San Jacinto/Caltrans)

13.Lyon Avenue at Esplanade Avenue (City of San Jacinto/City of Hemet)

14.Lyon Avenue at Florida Avenue (SR-74) (City of Hemet/Caltrans)

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1428 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1666 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 4 E. Analysis Scenarios: The analysis will evaluate traffic conditions for the following scenarios during the weekday AM (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) and weekday PM (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM):
 Existing Conditions;
 Background Conditions: Existing Plus Ambient Growth (2% per year to Opening Year 2027) Plus Cumulative Projects; and
 Background Plus Project Conditions: Existing Plus Ambient Growth (2% per year to Opening Year 2027) Plus Cumulative Projects Plus Project.

F. Traffic Analysis Parameters: The analysis will utilize the following parameters:
 Vistro 2022 analysis software and the Highway Capacity Manual 6th Edition (HCM 6) methodology.
 The intersection level of service calculations will be consistent with the criteria and parameters described in the City of San Jacinto’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020.  Existing timing plans will be used for any key study intersection(s) if directly specified by City of San Jacinto staff. Otherwise, optimized signal timings will be assumed.

G. Existing Traffic Counts: The analysis will utilize new traffic counts. The counts will not be collected by vehicle classification.
 AM peak period counts will be collected during one typical weekday from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM.
 PM peak period counts will be collected during one typical weekday from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM.

H. Background Conditions Opening Year (2027) Traffic Volumes: Opening year (2027) background traffic volumes will be derived by applying a linear annual growth rate of two percent (2%) per year to existing traffic volumes (i.e. 10% total growth from Existing Year 2022 to Opening Year 2027) and addition of traffic associated with specific cumulative projects in the area provided by the City.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1429 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1667 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 5 I. Vehicles Miles Traveled Analysis: Effective July 1st, 2020, the longstanding metric of roadway level of service (LOS), which is typically measured in terms of vehicle delay, roadway capacity and congestion, will no longer be considered a significant impact under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines, Section 15064.3, VMT is now the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts.

The City of San Jacinto has updated their transportation impact guidelines, Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020, to provide recommendations in the form of thresholds of significance and methodology for identifying VMT related impacts The proposed project is subject to a VMT analysis and will adhere to the recommendations and practices described in the City of San Jacinto’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020.

Per the City of San Jacinto’s Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines for Vehicle Miles Traveled and Level of Service Assessment, dated June 16, 2020, a VMT analysis shall be conducted for land use projects as deemed necessary by the City and would apply to projects that have the potential to increase the average VMT per service population (e.g. population but employment) compared to the subregion (WRCOG region). However, the following are three types of screening that the City may apply to effectively screen projects from projectlevel assessment: Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening; Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening; and Step 3: Project Type Screening. Step 3: Project Type Screening does not apply to this project since the project is forecast to generate greater than 500 daily trips.

The Western Riverside County Council of Governments (WRCOG) screening website, which utilizes the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RIVCOM), has been utilized for Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening and Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening criteria.

The project site has the following VMT characteristics:

APN: 436080001 & 436080002; TAZ: 2141
Within a Transit Priority Area (TPA)?
No (Fail)

Within a low VMT generating TAZ based on OD VMT Per Service Population? Yes (Pass)
Jurisdictional Threshold: Average 2022 Daily OD VMT Per Service Population = 33.6 Project TAZ: Average 2022 Daily OD VMT Per Service Population = 29.0 Project TAZ is 13.62% below the County Average (i.e. WRCOG Subregion)

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1430 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1668 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 6 As a result form the above, the proposed project is screened out based on Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening criteria and may be presumed to have a less than significant impact on VMT under CEQA. Therefore, no further VMT analysis is required.

Appendix A contains screenshots from the WRCOG screening website.

J. Performance Criteria:

City of San Jacinto: Acceptable LOS of D or better.

County of Riverside: According to the Riverside County General Plan, Section C 2.1, the following countywide target Levels of Service shall be maintained:
 LOS “C” shall apply to all development proposals in any area of the Riverside County not located within the boundaries of an Area Plan, as well those areas located within the following Area Plans: REMAP, Eastern Coachella Valley, Desert Center, Palo Verde Valley, and those non-Community Development areas of the Elsinore, Lake Mathews/ Woodcrest, Mead Valley and Temescal Canyon Area Plans.  LOS “D” shall apply to all development proposals located within any of the following Area Plans: Eastvale, Jurupa, Highgrove, Reche Canyon/Badlands, Lakeview/Nuevo, Sun City/Menifee Valley, Harvest Valley/Winchester, Southwest Area, The Pass, San Jacinto Valley, Western Coachella Valley and those Community Development Areas of the Elsinore, Lake Mathews/Woodcrest, Mead Valley and Temescal Canyon Area Plans.
 LOS “E” may be allowed by the Board of Supervisors within designated areas where transit-oriented development and walkable communities are proposed.

Based on the above-mentioned level of service and impact criteria, LOS D is the minimum acceptable LOS at the key study intersections.

City of Hemet: Acceptable LOS of D or better.

Caltrans: For residential and office projects, OPR’s Technical Advisory recommends VMT per capita or per employee thresholds 15% below existing city or regional VMT per capita.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1431 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1669 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 7 K. Impact Criteria:

City of San Jacinto
Determination of infrastructure improvements due to operational deficiencies will be based on a comparison of without and with project levels of service for each traffic analysis scenario. Infrastructure improvements will be identified to provide acceptable operations if any of the following occur:

Signalized Intersections
 Any signalized study intersection operating at an acceptable LOS D or better without project traffic in which addition of project traffic causes the intersections to degrade to a LOS E or F shall identify improvements to improve operations to LOS D or better; OR
 Any signalized study intersection that is operating at LOS E or F without project traffic where the project increases delay by 5.0 or more seconds shall identify improvements to offset the increase in delay.

Unsignalized intersections (If criteria A or if both criteria B and C occur) A. The addition of project related traffic causes the intersection to degrade from an acceptable LOS D or better to LOS E or F; OR
B. The project adds 5.0 seconds or more of delay to an intersection that is already projected to operate without project traffic at a LOS E or F; AND C. The intersection meets the peak hour traffic signal warrant after the addition of project traffic.

For unsignalized intersections, if the conditions above are satisfied, improvements should be made to achieve the following: LOS D or better for case A; or to pre-project LOS and delay for case B.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1432 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1670 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 8 Caltrans
The Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requires the use of analysis methods provided in the Highway Capacity Manual 6 (HCM 6) for the analysis of ramp intersections. For this analysis, LOS D is the target level of service standard and will be utilized to assess the Project impacts at the state-controlled study intersections.

Caltrans has also formally adopted VMT as the metric for reviewing the transportation impacts of a land use development and references the Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts In California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), dated December 2018, prepared by the State of California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) as the basis for its guidance on VMT assessment.

City of Hemet & County of Riverside
Significant impact criteria for the City of Hemet and the County of Riverside will also be considered for appropriate study intersections.

L. Request for Information: Please provide information on the following for use in the traffic study:
 Information on cumulative projects that need to be included in the traffic analysis (location, land use type(s), and land use quantities); and  Existing traffic signal timing plans for the signalized study intersections, if necessary.  Information on future roadway and circulation system modifications/improvements that are planned within the study area and would potentially affect the analysis.

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1433 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1671 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 9 If you have any questions, or would like further review, please call us at (949) 474-0809.

Sincerely,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.

Approved by:

Justin Tucker, P.E. City of San Jacinto
Principal Engineer
Attachments
Date

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1434 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1672 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Attachments

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1435 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1673 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1436 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1674 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1437
Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1675
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1438 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1676 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Appendix A
WRCOG VMT Screening

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1439 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1677 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1440 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1678 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1441 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1679 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Appendix B
Traffic Count Worksheets

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1442 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1680 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 01_SJC_Warren_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Warren Road
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Warren Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Warren Road
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 47 191 0 238 81 0 53 134 0 107 36 143 515 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 49 169 0 218 91 0 79 170 0 89 29 118 506 07:30 AM 0 1 0 1 45 164 0 209 83 1 68 152 0 114 39 153 515 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 32 149 0 181 54 0 78 132 1 124 46 171 484 Total 0 1 0 1 173 673 0 846 309 1 278 588 1 434 150 585 2020 08:00 AM 0 1 0 1 65 121 0 186 57 1 71 129 0 105 36 141 457 08:15 AM 0 1 0 1 38 151 0 189 64 1 66 131 0 97 41 138 459 08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 53 121 0 174 43 1 77 121 0 92 26 118 413 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 49 111 0 160 38 1 58 97 0 101 41 142 399 Total 0 2 0 2 205 504 0 709 202 4 272 478 0 395 144 539 1728 Grand Total 0 3 0 3 378 1177 0 1555 511 5 550 1066 1 829 294 1124 3748 Apprch % 0 100 0 24.3 75.7 0 47.9 0.5 51.6 0.1 73.8 26.2 Total % 0 0.1 0 0.1 10.1 31.4 0 41.5 13.6 0.1 14.7 28.4 0 22.1 7.8 30 Warren Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Warren Road
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 47 191 0 238 81 0 53 134 0 107 36 143 515 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 49 169 0 218 91 0 79 170 0 89 29 118 506 07:30 AM 0 1 0 1 45 164 0 209 83 1 68 152 0 114 39 153 515 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 32 149 0 181 54 0 78 132 1 124 46 171 484 Total Volume 0 1 0 1 173 673 0 846 309 1 278 588 1 434 150 585 2020 % App. Total 0 100 0 20.4 79.6 0 52.6 0.2 47.3 0.2 74.2 25.6 PHF .000 .250 .000 .250 .883 .881 .000 .889 .849 .250 .880 .865 .250 .875 .815 .855 .981 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1443 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1681 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 01_SJC_Warren_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Warren Road
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Warren Road
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
Warren Road
Right
0 Thru
1 Left
0 Out In Total
2 1 3
Right
0 Thru
673
Left
173
Out Total In
712 846 1558
Left
309
Thru
1 Right
278
Out In Total
324 588 912
Left
1 Thru
434
Right
150
Total Out In
982 585 1567
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 0 1 0 1 47 191 0 238 81 0 53 134 0 114 39 153
+15 mins. 0 0 0 0 49 169 0 218 91 0 79 170 1 124 46 171 +30 mins. 0 1 0 1 45 164 0 209 83 1 68 152 0 105 36 141 +45 mins. 0 1 0 1 32 149 0 181 54 0 78 132 0 97 41 138
Total Volume 0 3 0 3 173 673 0 846 309 1 278 588 1 440 162 603 % App. Total 0 100 0 20.4 79.6 0 52.6 0.2 47.3 0.2 73 26.9 PHF .000 .750 .000 .750 .883 .881 .000 .889 .849 .250 .880 .865 .250 .887 .880 .882 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1444 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1682 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 01_SJC_Warren_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Warren Road
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Warren Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Warren Road
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 56 171 0 227 41 0 65 106 1 185 84 270 603 04:15 PM 1 0 1 2 52 133 1 186 43 1 50 94 1 190 62 253 535 04:30 PM 2 0 0 2 68 130 0 198 39 0 60 99 0 192 91 283 582 04:45 PM 0 0 1 1 72 132 0 204 33 0 62 95 0 200 80 280 580 Total 3 0 2 5 248 566 1 815 156 1 237 394 2 767 317 1086 2300 05:00 PM 0 1 0 1 68 118 0 186 47 0 62 109 0 201 88 289 585 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 71 171 0 242 40 0 64 104 0 181 60 241 587 05:30 PM 0 1 0 1 68 178 0 246 41 0 55 96 0 145 72 217 560 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 69 145 0 214 45 0 64 109 0 189 66 255 578 Total 0 2 0 2 276 612 0 888 173 0 245 418 0 716 286 1002 2310 Grand Total 3 2 2 7 524 1178 1 1703 329 1 482 812 2 1483 603 2088 4610 Apprch % 42.9 28.6 28.6 30.8 69.2 0.1 40.5 0.1 59.4 0.1 71 28.9 Total % 0.1 0 0 0.2 11.4 25.6 0 36.9 7.1 0 10.5 17.6 0 32.2 13.1 45.3 Warren Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Warren Road
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 2 0 0 2 68 130 0 198 39 0 60 99 0 192 91 283 582 04:45 PM 0 0 1 1 72 132 0 204 33 0 62 95 0 200 80 280 580 05:00 PM 0 1 0 1 68 118 0 186 47 0 62 109 0 201 88 289 585 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 71 171 0 242 40 0 64 104 0 181 60 241 587 Total Volume 2 1 1 4 279 551 0 830 159 0 248 407 0 774 319 1093 2334 % App. Total 50 25 25 33.6 66.4 0 39.1 0 60.9 0 70.8 29.2 PHF .250 .250 .250 .500 .969 .806 .000 .857 .846 .000 .969 .933 .000 .963 .876 .946 .994 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1445 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1683 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 01_SJC_Warren_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Warren Road
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Warren Road
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
Warren Road
Right
1 Thru
1 Left
2 Out In Total
0 4 4
Right
0 Thru
551
Left
279
Out Total In
1024 830 1854
Left
159
Thru
0 Right
248
Out In Total
599 407 1006
Left
0 Thru
774
Right
319
Total Out In
711 1093 1804
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:15 PM 05:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:15 PM
+0 mins. 1 0 1 2 68 118 0 186 47 0 62 109 1 190 62 253
+15 mins. 2 0 0 2 71 171 0 242 40 0 64 104 0 192 91 283 +30 mins. 0 0 1 1 68 178 0 246 41 0 55 96 0 200 80 280
+45 mins. 0 1 0 1 69 145 0 214 45 0 64 109 0 201 88 289 Total Volume 3 1 2 6 276 612 0 888 173 0 245 418 1 783 321 1105 % App. Total 50 16.7 33.3 31.1 68.9 0 41.4 0 58.6 0.1 70.9 29 PHF .375 .250 .500 .750 .972 .860 .000 .902 .920 .000 .957 .959 .250 .974 .882 .956 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1446 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1684 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 02_SJC_Sand_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 102 151 66 319 2 150 95 247 33 170 1 204 82 69 13 164 934 07:15 AM 138 156 61 355 5 119 81 205 36 189 12 237 75 72 4 151 948 07:30 AM 131 131 49 311 3 122 98 223 45 179 8 232 89 74 18 181 947 07:45 AM 147 141 45 333 11 106 99 216 21 150 7 178 95 86 13 194 921 Total 518 579 221 1318 21 497 373 891 135 688 28 851 341 301 48 690 3750 08:00 AM 129 150 56 335 16 92 103 211 25 162 6 193 65 78 19 162 901 08:15 AM 113 132 47 292 10 101 126 237 29 174 4 207 89 71 17 177 913 08:30 AM 126 137 55 318 11 87 100 198 42 153 9 204 81 70 12 163 883 08:45 AM 115 98 44 257 10 74 97 181 29 170 9 208 71 66 19 156 802 Total 483 517 202 1202 47 354 426 827 125 659 28 812 306 285 67 658 3499 Grand Total 1001 1096 423 2520 68 851 799 1718 260 1347 56 1663 647 586 115 1348 7249 Apprch % 39.7 43.5 16.8 4 49.5 46.5 15.6 81 3.4 48 43.5 8.5 Total % 13.8 15.1 5.8 34.8 0.9 11.7 11 23.7 3.6 18.6 0.8 22.9 8.9 8.1 1.6 18.6 Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 102 151 66 319 2 150 95 247 33 170 1 204 82 69 13 164 934 07:15 AM 138 156 61 355 5 119 81 205 36 189 12 237 75 72 4 151 948 07:30 AM 131 131 49 311 3 122 98 223 45 179 8 232 89 74 18 181 947 07:45 AM 147 141 45 333 11 106 99 216 21 150 7 178 95 86 13 194 921 Total Volume 518 579 221 1318 21 497 373 891 135 688 28 851 341 301 48 690 3750 % App. Total 39.3 43.9 16.8 2.4 55.8 41.9 15.9 80.8 3.3 49.4 43.6 7 PHF .881 .928 .837 .928 .477 .828 .942 .902 .750 .910 .583 .898 .897 .875 .667 .889 .989 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1447 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1685 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 02_SJC_Sand_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Sanderson Avenue
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
Sanderson Avenue
Right
221
Thru
579
Left
518
Out In Total
1402 1318 2720
Right
373
Thru
497
Left
21 Out Total In
847 891 1738
Left
135
Thru
688
Right
28 Out In Total
648 851 1499
Left
341
Thru
301
Right
48 Total Out In
853 690 1543
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 138 156 61 355 2 150 95 247 33 170 1 204 89 74 18 181 +15 mins. 131 131 49 311 5 119 81 205 36 189 12 237 95 86 13 194 +30 mins. 147 141 45 333 3 122 98 223 45 179 8 232 65 78 19 162 +45 mins. 129 150 56 335 11 106 99 216 21 150 7 178 89 71 17 177 Total Volume 545 578 211 1334 21 497 373 891 135 688 28 851 338 309 67 714 % App. Total 40.9 43.3 15.8 2.4 55.8 41.9 15.9 80.8 3.3 47.3 43.3 9.4 PHF .927 .926 .865 .939 .477 .828 .942 .902 .750 .910 .583 .898 .889 .898 .882 .920 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1448 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1686 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 02_SJC_Sand_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 199 317 112 628 9 89 108 206 21 153 13 187 91 116 27 234 1255 04:15 PM 189 302 70 561 11 83 131 225 23 140 7 170 79 115 34 228 1184 04:30 PM 194 295 100 589 7 75 84 166 24 167 7 198 78 140 32 250 1203 04:45 PM 179 288 64 531 12 105 117 234 24 144 5 173 96 133 44 273 1211 Total 761 1202 346 2309 39 352 440 831 92 604 32 728 344 504 137 985 4853 05:00 PM 199 309 70 578 7 98 118 223 17 149 5 171 77 137 37 251 1223 05:15 PM 166 284 83 533 10 127 156 293 33 168 4 205 77 132 25 234 1265 05:30 PM 153 294 86 533 15 119 118 252 31 163 4 198 78 112 28 218 1201 05:45 PM 210 295 97 602 4 95 88 187 18 153 7 178 77 134 28 239 1206 Total 728 1182 336 2246 36 439 480 955 99 633 20 752 309 515 118 942 4895 Grand Total 1489 2384 682 4555 75 791 920 1786 191 1237 52 1480 653 1019 255 1927 9748 Apprch % 32.7 52.3 15 4.2 44.3 51.5 12.9 83.6 3.5 33.9 52.9 13.2 Total % 15.3 24.5 7 46.7 0.8 8.1 9.4 18.3 2 12.7 0.5 15.2 6.7 10.5 2.6 19.8 Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 194 295 100 589 7 75 84 166 24 167 7 198 78 140 32 250 1203 04:45 PM 179 288 64 531 12 105 117 234 24 144 5 173 96 133 44 273 1211 05:00 PM 199 309 70 578 7 98 118 223 17 149 5 171 77 137 37 251 1223 05:15 PM 166 284 83 533 10 127 156 293 33 168 4 205 77 132 25 234 1265 Total Volume 738 1176 317 2231 36 405 475 916 98 628 21 747 328 542 138 1008 4902 % App. Total 33.1 52.7 14.2 3.9 44.2 51.9 13.1 84.1 2.8 32.5 53.8 13.7 PHF .927 .951 .793 .947 .750 .797 .761 .782 .742 .935 .750 .911 .854 .968 .784 .923 .969 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1449 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1687 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 02_SJC_Sand_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Sanderson Avenue
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
Sanderson Avenue
Right
317
Thru
1176
Left
738
Out In Total
1431 2231 3662
Right
475
Thru
405
Left
36 Out Total In
1301 916 2217
Left
98 Thru
628
Right
21 Out In Total
1350 747 2097
Left
328
Thru
542
Right
138
Total Out In
820 1008 1828
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 199 317 112 628 12 105 117 234 17 149 5 171 78 140 32 250 +15 mins. 189 302 70 561 7 98 118 223 33 168 4 205 96 133 44 273 +30 mins. 194 295 100 589 10 127 156 293 31 163 4 198 77 137 37 251 +45 mins. 179 288 64 531 15 119 118 252 18 153 7 178 77 132 25 234 Total Volume 761 1202 346 2309 44 449 509 1002 99 633 20 752 328 542 138 1008 % App. Total 33 52.1 15 4.4 44.8 50.8 13.2 84.2 2.7 32.5 53.8 13.7 PHF .956 .948 .772 .919 .733 .884 .816 .855 .750 .942 .714 .917 .854 .968 .784 .923 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1450 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1688 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 03_SJC_Sand_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 17 155 172 10 29 39 178 3 181 392
07:15 AM 17 157 174 14 34 48 208 9 217 439
07:30 AM 19 142 161 15 34 49 204 7 211 421
07:45 AM 20 151 171 15 23 38 154 6 160 369
Total 73 605 678 54 120 174 744 25 769 1621
08:00 AM 22 163 185 15 25 40 170 2 172 397
08:15 AM 18 146 164 8 36 44 173 3 176 384
08:30 AM 18 142 160 9 28 37 171 8 179 376
08:45 AM 11 114 125 10 23 33 176 13 189 347
Total 69 565 634 42 112 154 690 26 716 1504
Grand Total 142 1170 1312 96 232 328 1434 51 1485 3125
Apprch % 10.8 89.2 29.3 70.7 96.6 3.4
Total % 4.5 37.4 42 3.1 7.4 10.5 45.9 1.6 47.5
Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 17 157 174 14 34 48 208 9 217 439
07:30 AM 19 142 161 15 34 49 204 7 211 421
07:45 AM 20 151 171 15 23 38 154 6 160 369
08:00 AM 22 163 185 15 25 40 170 2 172 397
Total Volume 78 613 691 59 116 175 736 24 760 1626
% App. Total 11.3 88.7 33.7 66.3 96.8 3.2
PHF .886 .940 .934 .983 .853 .893 .885 .667 .876 .926
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1451 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1689 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 03_SJC_Sand_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Sanderson Avenue
Ramona Boulevard
Sanderson Avenue
Thru
613
Left
78 Out In Total
852 691 1543
Right
116
Left
59 Out Total In
102 175 277
Thru
736
Right
24 Out In Total
672 760 1432
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:00 AM
+0 mins. 17 157 174 14 34 48 178 3 181
+15 mins. 19 142 161 15 34 49 208 9 217
+30 mins. 20 151 171 15 23 38 204 7 211
+45 mins. 22 163 185 15 25 40 154 6 160
Total Volume 78 613 691 59 116 175 744 25 769
% App. Total 11.3 88.7 33.7 66.3 96.7 3.3
PHF .886 .940 .934 .983 .853 .893 .894 .694 .886
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1452 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1690 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 03_SJC_Sand_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 68 289 357 13 16 29 163 13 176 562
04:15 PM 66 284 350 12 25 37 150 15 165 552
04:30 PM 58 283 341 15 26 41 172 10 182 564
04:45 PM 71 278 349 15 18 33 156 8 164 546
Total 263 1134 1397 55 85 140 641 46 687 2224
05:00 PM 72 286 358 10 25 35 150 14 164 557
05:15 PM 49 273 322 10 31 41 181 13 194 557
05:30 PM 56 284 340 11 32 43 173 12 185 568
05:45 PM 53 273 326 7 26 33 155 17 172 531
Total 230 1116 1346 38 114 152 659 56 715 2213
Grand Total 493 2250 2743 93 199 292 1300 102 1402 4437 Apprch % 18 82 31.8 68.2 92.7 7.3
Total % 11.1 50.7 61.8 2.1 4.5 6.6 29.3 2.3 31.6
Sanderson Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Sanderson Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 71 278 349 15 18 33 156 8 164 546
05:00 PM 72 286 358 10 25 35 150 14 164 557
05:15 PM 49 273 322 10 31 41 181 13 194 557
05:30 PM 56 284 340 11 32 43 173 12 185 568
Total Volume 248 1121 1369 46 106 152 660 47 707 2228
% App. Total 18.1 81.9 30.3 69.7 93.4 6.6
PHF .861 .980 .956 .767 .828 .884 .912 .839 .911 .981
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1453 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1691 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 03_SJC_Sand_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Sanderson Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Sanderson Avenue
Ramona Boulevard
Sanderson Avenue
Thru
1121
Left
248
Out In Total
766 1369 2135
Right
106
Left
46 Out Total In
295 152 447
Thru
660
Right
47 Out In Total
1167 707 1874
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:15 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM
+0 mins. 66 284 350 15 18 33 150 14 164
+15 mins. 58 283 341 10 25 35 181 13 194
+30 mins. 71 278 349 10 31 41 173 12 185
+45 mins. 72 286 358 11 32 43 155 17 172
Total Volume 267 1131 1398 46 106 152 659 56 715
% App. Total 19.1 80.9 30.3 69.7 92.2 7.8
PHF .927 .989 .976 .767 .828 .884 .910 .824 .921
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1454 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1692 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 04_SJC_Ranch_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Ranch View Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Ranch View Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 1 33 34 7 1 8 38 1 39 81
07:15 AM 0 44 44 8 2 10 36 2 38 92
07:30 AM 2 43 45 2 3 5 38 2 40 90
07:45 AM 0 42 42 3 2 5 30 0 30 77
Total 3 162 165 20 8 28 142 5 147 340
08:00 AM 1 40 41 1 3 4 39 1 40 85
08:15 AM 1 40 41 1 3 4 28 1 29 74
08:30 AM 2 42 44 0 4 4 30 2 32 80
08:45 AM 3 31 34 1 0 1 26 3 29 64
Total 7 153 160 3 10 13 123 7 130 303
Grand Total 10 315 325 23 18 41 265 12 277 643
Apprch % 3.1 96.9 56.1 43.9 95.7 4.3
Total % 1.6 49 50.5 3.6 2.8 6.4 41.2 1.9 43.1
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Ranch View Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 0 44 44 8 2 10 36 2 38 92
07:30 AM 2 43 45 2 3 5 38 2 40 90
07:45 AM 0 42 42 3 2 5 30 0 30 77
08:00 AM 1 40 41 1 3 4 39 1 40 85
Total Volume 3 169 172 14 10 24 143 5 148 344
% App. Total 1.7 98.3 58.3 41.7 96.6 3.4
PHF .375 .960 .956 .438 .833 .600 .917 .625 .925 .935
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1455 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1693 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 04_SJC_Ranch_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Ranch View Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
Ranch View Lane
Thru
169
Left
3 Out Total In
153 172 325
Left
14 Right
10 Out In Total
8 24 32
Thru
143
Right
5 Total Out In
183 148 331
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 0 44 44 7 1 8 36 2 38
+15 mins. 2 43 45 8 2 10 38 2 40
+30 mins. 0 42 42 2 3 5 30 0 30
+45 mins. 1 40 41 3 2 5 39 1 40
Total Volume 3 169 172 20 8 28 143 5 148
% App. Total 1.7 98.3 71.4 28.6 96.6 3.4
PHF .375 .960 .956 .625 .667 .700 .917 .625 .925
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1456 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1694 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 04_SJC_Ranch_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Ranch View Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Ranch View Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 3 38 41 1 1 2 65 3 68 111
04:15 PM 0 39 39 1 1 2 78 6 84 125
04:30 PM 3 35 38 4 1 5 55 4 59 102
04:45 PM 0 44 44 2 3 5 72 5 77 126
Total 6 156 162 8 6 14 270 18 288 464
05:00 PM 2 36 38 3 3 6 80 5 85 129
05:15 PM 2 47 49 2 2 4 61 4 65 118
05:30 PM 2 40 42 3 0 3 66 2 68 113
05:45 PM 2 35 37 0 3 3 65 5 70 110
Total 8 158 166 8 8 16 272 16 288 470
Grand Total 14 314 328 16 14 30 542 34 576 934
Apprch % 4.3 95.7 53.3 46.7 94.1 5.9
Total % 1.5 33.6 35.1 1.7 1.5 3.2 58 3.6 61.7
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Ranch View Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 0 44 44 2 3 5 72 5 77 126
05:00 PM 2 36 38 3 3 6 80 5 85 129
05:15 PM 2 47 49 2 2 4 61 4 65 118
05:30 PM 2 40 42 3 0 3 66 2 68 113
Total Volume 6 167 173 10 8 18 279 16 295 486
% App. Total 3.5 96.5 55.6 44.4 94.6 5.4
PHF .750 .888 .883 .833 .667 .750 .872 .800 .868 .942
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1457 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1695 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 04_SJC_Ranch_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Ranch View Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
Ranch View Lane
Thru
167
Left
6 Out Total In
287 173 460
Left
10 Right
8 Out In Total
22 18 40
Thru
279
Right
16 Total Out In
177 295 472
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:45 PM 04:30 PM 04:15 PM
+0 mins. 0 44 44 4 1 5 78 6 84
+15 mins. 2 36 38 2 3 5 55 4 59
+30 mins. 2 47 49 3 3 6 72 5 77
+45 mins. 2 40 42 2 2 4 80 5 85
Total Volume 6 167 173 11 9 20 285 20 305
% App. Total 3.5 96.5 55 45 93.4 6.6
PHF .750 .888 .883 .688 .750 .833 .891 .833 .897
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1458 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1696 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 05_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Potter Road/Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Potter Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 1 3 4 9 198 1 208 55 3 15 73 2 163 14 179 464 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 16 170 0 186 42 1 16 59 0 192 14 206 451 07:30 AM 2 2 1 5 11 189 2 202 36 0 24 60 1 191 19 211 478 07:45 AM 1 0 1 2 12 167 0 179 51 4 23 78 1 258 25 284 543 Total 3 3 5 11 48 724 3 775 184 8 78 270 4 804 72 880 1936 08:00 AM 0 0 2 2 15 191 3 209 33 2 28 63 0 197 16 213 487 08:15 AM 1 1 2 4 10 197 1 208 37 1 25 63 0 187 11 198 473 08:30 AM 0 1 1 2 15 148 1 164 37 1 12 50 0 193 10 203 419 08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 19 161 0 180 21 1 10 32 2 198 23 223 435 Total 1 2 5 8 59 697 5 761 128 5 75 208 2 775 60 837 1814 Grand Total 4 5 10 19 107 1421 8 1536 312 13 153 478 6 1579 132 1717 3750 Apprch % 21.1 26.3 52.6 7 92.5 0.5 65.3 2.7 32 0.3 92 7.7 Total % 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 2.9 37.9 0.2 41 8.3 0.3 4.1 12.7 0.2 42.1 3.5 45.8 Potter Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 2 2 1 5 11 189 2 202 36 0 24 60 1 191 19 211 478 07:45 AM 1 0 1 2 12 167 0 179 51 4 23 78 1 258 25 284 543 08:00 AM 0 0 2 2 15 191 3 209 33 2 28 63 0 197 16 213 487 08:15 AM 1 1 2 4 10 197 1 208 37 1 25 63 0 187 11 198 473 Total Volume 4 3 6 13 48 744 6 798 157 7 100 264 2 833 71 906 1981 % App. Total 30.8 23.1 46.2 6 93.2 0.8 59.5 2.7 37.9 0.2 91.9 7.8 PHF .500 .375 .750 .650 .800 .944 .500 .955 .770 .438 .893 .846 .500 .807 .710 .798 .912 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1459 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1697 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 05_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Potter Road/Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Potter Road
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
Lyon Avenue
Right
6 Thru
3 Left
4 Out In Total
15 13 28
Right
6 Thru
744
Left
48 Out Total In
937 798 1735
Left
157
Thru
7 Right
100
Out In Total
122 264 386
Left
2 Thru
833
Right
71 Total Out In
907 906 1813
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:30 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 2 2 1 5 11 189 2 202 55 3 15 73 0 192 14 206
+15 mins. 1 0 1 2 12 167 0 179 42 1 16 59 1 191 19 211
+30 mins. 0 0 2 2 15 191 3 209 36 0 24 60 1 258 25 284
+45 mins. 1 1 2 4 10 197 1 208 51 4 23 78 0 197 16 213
Total Volume 4 3 6 13 48 744 6 798 184 8 78 270 2 838 74 914 % App. Total 30.8 23.1 46.2 6 93.2 0.8 68.1 3 28.9 0.2 91.7 8.1 PHF .500 .375 .750 .650 .800 .944 .500 .955 .836 .500 .813 .865 .500 .812 .740 .805 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1460 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1698 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 05_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Potter Road/Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Potter Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 2 1 1 4 9 168 0 177 34 0 10 44 2 277 49 328 553 04:15 PM 1 3 1 5 15 203 1 219 35 1 8 44 1 246 48 295 563 04:30 PM 0 1 0 1 13 148 0 161 28 0 17 45 1 283 39 323 530 04:45 PM 1 2 0 3 9 202 1 212 21 2 10 33 1 285 36 322 570 Total 4 7 2 13 46 721 2 769 118 3 45 166 5 1091 172 1268 2216 05:00 PM 1 4 0 5 15 208 0 223 35 2 9 46 1 303 45 349 623 05:15 PM 3 0 2 5 9 199 1 209 53 0 5 58 0 238 31 269 541 05:30 PM 1 0 0 1 10 203 0 213 37 0 7 44 1 260 44 305 563 05:45 PM 1 1 0 2 7 179 0 186 23 1 6 30 0 283 39 322 540 Total 6 5 2 13 41 789 1 831 148 3 27 178 2 1084 159 1245 2267 Grand Total 10 12 4 26 87 1510 3 1600 266 6 72 344 7 2175 331 2513 4483 Apprch % 38.5 46.2 15.4 5.4 94.4 0.2 77.3 1.7 20.9 0.3 86.5 13.2 Total % 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.6 1.9 33.7 0.1 35.7 5.9 0.1 1.6 7.7 0.2 48.5 7.4 56.1 Potter Road
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 1 2 0 3 9 202 1 212 21 2 10 33 1 285 36 322 570 05:00 PM 1 4 0 5 15 208 0 223 35 2 9 46 1 303 45 349 623 05:15 PM 3 0 2 5 9 199 1 209 53 0 5 58 0 238 31 269 541 05:30 PM 1 0 0 1 10 203 0 213 37 0 7 44 1 260 44 305 563 Total Volume 6 6 2 14 43 812 2 857 146 4 31 181 3 1086 156 1245 2297 % App. Total 42.9 42.9 14.3 5 94.7 0.2 80.7 2.2 17.1 0.2 87.2 12.5 PHF .500 .375 .250 .700 .717 .976 .500 .961 .689 .500 .775 .780 .750 .896 .867 .892 .922 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1461 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1699 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 05_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Potter Road/Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Potter Road
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
Lyon Avenue
Right
2 Thru
6 Left
6 Out In Total
9 14 23
Right
2 Thru
812
Left
43 Out Total In
1123 857 1980
Left
146
Thru
4 Right
31 Out In Total
205 181 386
Left
3 1086
Thru Right
156
Total Out In
960 1245 2205
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:15 PM 04:45 PM 04:30 PM 04:15 PM
+0 mins. 1 3 1 5 9 202 1 212 28 0 17 45 1 246 48 295
+15 mins. 0 1 0 1 15 208 0 223 21 2 10 33 1 283 39 323
+30 mins. 1 2 0 3 9 199 1 209 35 2 9 46 1 285 36 322
+45 mins. 1 4 0 5 10 203 0 213 53 0 5 58 1 303 45 349
Total Volume 3 10 1 14 43 812 2 857 137 4 41 182 4 1117 168 1289 % App. Total 21.4 71.4 7.1 5 94.7 0.2 75.3 2.2 22.5 0.3 86.7 13 PHF .750 .625 .250 .700 .717 .976 .500 .961 .646 .500 .603 .784 1.000 .922 .875 .923 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1462 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1700 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 06_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 5 19 2 26 11 21 12 44 6 57 13 76 5 25 27 57 203 07:15 AM 0 23 5 28 9 26 9 44 19 51 12 82 7 29 21 57 211 07:30 AM 4 25 3 32 7 24 5 36 15 56 15 86 6 35 8 49 203
07:45 AM 3 27 5 35 11 27 13 51 6 56 8 70 8 30 10 48 204 Total 12 94 15 121 38 98 39 175 46 220 48 314 26 119 66 211 821 08:00 AM 6 18 6 30 11 29 8 48 3 54 3 60 12 24 15 51 189 08:15 AM 1 16 3 20 7 34 11 52 12 41 4 57 7 21 19 47 176 08:30 AM 1 20 5 26 9 44 8 61 5 31 6 42 10 31 23 64 193
08:45 AM 4 32 3 39 10 34 12 56 6 24 5 35 5 16 11 32 162 Total 12 86 17 115 37 141 39 217 26 150 18 194 34 92 68 194 720 Grand Total 24 180 32 236 75 239 78 392 72 370 66 508 60 211 134 405 1541 Apprch % 10.2 76.3 13.6 19.1 61 19.9 14.2 72.8 13 14.8 52.1 33.1 Total % 1.6 11.7 2.1 15.3 4.9 15.5 5.1 25.4 4.7 24 4.3 33 3.9 13.7 8.7 26.3 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 5 19 2 26 11 21 12 44 6 57 13 76 5 25 27 57 203 07:15 AM 0 23 5 28 9 26 9 44 19 51 12 82 7 29 21 57 211 07:30 AM 4 25 3 32 7 24 5 36 15 56 15 86 6 35 8 49 203
07:45 AM 3 27 5 35 11 27 13 51 6 56 8 70 8 30 10 48 204 Total Volume 12 94 15 121 38 98 39 175 46 220 48 314 26 119 66 211 821 % App. Total 9.9 77.7 12.4 21.7 56 22.3 14.6 70.1 15.3 12.3 56.4 31.3 PHF .600 .870 .750 .864 .864 .907 .750 .858 .605 .965 .800 .913 .813 .850 .611 .925 .973 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1463 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1701 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 06_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
Lyon Avenue
Right
15 Thru
94 Left
12 Out In Total
285 121 406
Right
39 Thru
98 Left
38 Out Total In
179 175 354
Left
46 Thru
220
Right
48 Out In Total
198 314 512
Left
26 Thru
119
Right
66 Total Out In
159 211 370
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 08:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM
+0 mins. 0 23 5 28 11 29 8 48 6 57 13 76 5 25 27 57
+15 mins. 4 25 3 32 7 34 11 52 19 51 12 82 7 29 21 57
+30 mins. 3 27 5 35 9 44 8 61 15 56 15 86 6 35 8 49
+45 mins. 6 18 6 30 10 34 12 56 6 56 8 70 8 30 10 48
Total Volume 13 93 19 125 37 141 39 217 46 220 48 314 26 119 66 211 % App. Total 10.4 74.4 15.2 17.1 65 18 14.6 70.1 15.3 12.3 56.4 31.3 PHF .542 .861 .792 .893 .841 .801 .813 .889 .605 .965 .800 .913 .813 .850 .611 .925 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1464 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1702 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 06_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 10 46 7 63 5 24 7 36 9 35 3 47 2 42 12 56 202
04:15 PM 5 56 6 67 9 34 5 48 10 38 3 51 4 48 18 70 236
04:30 PM 5 48 5 58 5 30 2 37 9 35 2 46 2 32 27 61 202
04:45 PM 6 39 5 50 5 30 6 41 8 23 4 35 9 32 35 76 202
Total 26 189 23 238 24 118 20 162 36 131 12 179 17 154 92 263 842 05:00 PM 8 46 6 60 5 23 6 34 13 32 3 48 4 45 30 79 221
05:15 PM 9 38 1 48 3 34 9 46 11 49 8 68 2 39 25 66 228
05:30 PM 3 47 2 52 6 35 10 51 9 30 0 39 4 31 19 54 196
05:45 PM 6 41 2 49 5 26 2 33 10 25 6 41 4 37 26 67 190
Total 26 172 11 209 19 118 27 164 43 136 17 196 14 152 100 266 835 Grand Total 52 361 34 447 43 236 47 326 79 267 29 375 31 306 192 529 1677 Apprch % 11.6 80.8 7.6 13.2 72.4 14.4 21.1 71.2 7.7 5.9 57.8 36.3 Total % 3.1 21.5 2 26.7 2.6 14.1 2.8 19.4 4.7 15.9 1.7 22.4 1.8 18.2 11.4 31.5 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 5 56 6 67 9 34 5 48 10 38 3 51 4 48 18 70 236
04:30 PM 5 48 5 58 5 30 2 37 9 35 2 46 2 32 27 61 202
04:45 PM 6 39 5 50 5 30 6 41 8 23 4 35 9 32 35 76 202
05:00 PM 8 46 6 60 5 23 6 34 13 32 3 48 4 45 30 79 221
Total Volume 24 189 22 235 24 117 19 160 40 128 12 180 19 157 110 286 861 % App. Total 10.2 80.4 9.4 15 73.1 11.9 22.2 71.1 6.7 6.6 54.9 38.5 PHF .750 .844 .917 .877 .667 .860 .792 .833 .769 .842 .750 .882 .528 .818 .786 .905 .912 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1465 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1703 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 06_SJC_Lyon_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
Lyon Avenue
Right
22 Thru
189
Left
24 Out In Total
166 235 401
Right
19 Thru
117
Left
24 Out Total In
193 160 353
Left
40 Thru
128
Right
12 Out In Total
323 180 503
Left
19 Thru
157
Right
110
Total Out In
179 286 465
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:30 PM 04:15 PM
+0 mins. 10 46 7 63 5 30 6 41 9 35 2 46 4 48 18 70
+15 mins. 5 56 6 67 5 23 6 34 8 23 4 35 2 32 27 61
+30 mins. 5 48 5 58 3 34 9 46 13 32 3 48 9 32 35 76
+45 mins. 6 39 5 50 6 35 10 51 11 49 8 68 4 45 30 79
Total Volume 26 189 23 238 19 122 31 172 41 139 17 197 19 157 110 286 % App. Total 10.9 79.4 9.7 11 70.9 18 20.8 70.6 8.6 6.6 54.9 38.5 PHF .650 .844 .821 .888 .792 .871 .775 .843 .788 .709 .531 .724 .528 .818 .786 .905 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1466 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1704 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 07_SJC_Lyon_De Anza AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: De Anza Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
De Anza Drive
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 3 57 60 31 13 44 62 61 123 227
07:15 AM 8 51 59 48 10 58 80 100 180 297
07:30 AM 5 38 43 15 10 25 76 37 113 181
07:45 AM 8 42 50 15 10 25 61 19 80 155
Total 24 188 212 109 43 152 279 217 496 860
08:00 AM 10 32 42 17 13 30 43 19 62 134
08:15 AM 19 29 48 24 13 37 47 32 79 164
08:30 AM 29 33 62 15 10 25 32 19 51 138
08:45 AM 11 41 52 14 11 25 25 8 33 110
Total 69 135 204 70 47 117 147 78 225 546
Grand Total 93 323 416 179 90 269 426 295 721 1406
Apprch % 22.4 77.6 66.5 33.5 59.1 40.9
Total % 6.6 23 29.6 12.7 6.4 19.1 30.3 21 51.3
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
De Anza Drive
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 3 57 60 31 13 44 62 61 123 227
07:15 AM 8 51 59 48 10 58 80 100 180 297
07:30 AM 5 38 43 15 10 25 76 37 113 181
07:45 AM 8 42 50 15 10 25 61 19 80 155
Total Volume 24 188 212 109 43 152 279 217 496 860
% App. Total 11.3 88.7 71.7 28.3 56.2 43.8
PHF .750 .825 .883 .568 .827 .655 .872 .543 .689 .724
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1467 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1705 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 07_SJC_Lyon_De Anza AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: De Anza Drive
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
De Anza Drive
Lyon Avenue
Thru
188
Left
24 Out In Total
322 212 534
Right
43 Left
109
Out Total In
241 152 393
Thru
279
Right
217
Out In Total
297 496 793
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM
+0 mins. 3 57 60 31 13 44 62 61 123
+15 mins. 8 51 59 48 10 58 80 100 180
+30 mins. 5 38 43 15 10 25 76 37 113
+45 mins. 8 42 50 15 10 25 61 19 80
Total Volume 24 188 212 109 43 152 279 217 496
% App. Total 11.3 88.7 71.7 28.3 56.2 43.8
PHF .750 .825 .883 .568 .827 .655 .872 .543 .689
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1468 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1706 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 07_SJC_Lyon_De Anza PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: De Anza Drive
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
De Anza Drive
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 17 49 66 15 6 21 42 17 59 146
04:15 PM 19 61 80 13 11 24 39 12 51 155
04:30 PM 20 60 80 14 6 20 39 18 57 157
04:45 PM 26 52 78 11 4 15 32 16 48 141
Total 82 222 304 53 27 80 152 63 215 599
05:00 PM 18 66 84 10 8 18 51 18 69 171
05:15 PM 21 43 64 12 14 26 56 20 76 166
05:30 PM 14 58 72 6 6 12 29 22 51 135
05:45 PM 20 55 75 18 9 27 33 14 47 149
Total 73 222 295 46 37 83 169 74 243 621
Grand Total 155 444 599 99 64 163 321 137 458 1220
Apprch % 25.9 74.1 60.7 39.3 70.1 29.9
Total % 12.7 36.4 49.1 8.1 5.2 13.4 26.3 11.2 37.5
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
De Anza Drive
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Start Time Left Thru App. Total Left Right App. Total Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 20 60 80 14 6 20 39 18 57 157
04:45 PM 26 52 78 11 4 15 32 16 48 141
05:00 PM 18 66 84 10 8 18 51 18 69 171
05:15 PM 21 43 64 12 14 26 56 20 76 166
Total Volume 85 221 306 47 32 79 178 72 250 635
% App. Total 27.8 72.2 59.5 40.5 71.2 28.8
PHF .817 .837 .911 .839 .571 .760 .795 .900 .822 .928
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1469 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1707 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 07_SJC_Lyon_De Anza PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: De Anza Drive
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
De Anza Drive
Lyon Avenue
Thru
221
Left
85 Out In Total
210 306 516
Right
32 Left
47 Out Total In
157 79 236
Thru
178
Right
72 Out In Total
268 250 518
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:15 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 19 61 80 10 8 18 39 18 57
+15 mins. 20 60 80 12 14 26 32 16 48
+30 mins. 26 52 78 6 6 12 51 18 69
+45 mins. 18 66 84 18 9 27 56 20 76
Total Volume 83 239 322 46 37 83 178 72 250
% App. Total 25.8 74.2 55.4 44.6 71.2 28.8
PHF .798 .905 .958 .639 .661 .769 .795 .900 .822
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1470 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1708 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 08_SJC_State_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
State Street
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 20 47 10 77 15 127 87 229 69 144 5 218 15 87 76 178 702 07:15 AM 18 50 10 78 14 119 89 222 54 154 18 226 26 85 79 190 716 07:30 AM 12 57 12 81 45 130 94 269 49 123 18 190 36 112 102 250 790 07:45 AM 21 57 9 87 48 107 86 241 57 161 34 252 35 128 121 284 864 Total 71 211 41 323 122 483 356 961 229 582 75 886 112 412 378 902 3072 08:00 AM 24 51 14 89 36 102 84 222 86 184 39 309 29 109 86 224 844 08:15 AM 19 41 14 74 41 152 81 274 72 147 25 244 25 118 74 217 809 08:30 AM 30 62 13 105 27 104 77 208 54 131 13 198 28 112 99 239 750 08:45 AM 19 51 21 91 22 106 61 189 46 118 17 181 36 94 91 221 682 Total 92 205 62 359 126 464 303 893 258 580 94 932 118 433 350 901 3085 Grand Total 163 416 103 682 248 947 659 1854 487 1162 169 1818 230 845 728 1803 6157 Apprch % 23.9 61 15.1 13.4 51.1 35.5 26.8 63.9 9.3 12.8 46.9 40.4 Total % 2.6 6.8 1.7 11.1 4 15.4 10.7 30.1 7.9 18.9 2.7 29.5 3.7 13.7 11.8 29.3 State Street
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 12 57 12 81 45 130 94 269 49 123 18 190 36 112 102 250 790 07:45 AM 21 57 9 87 48 107 86 241 57 161 34 252 35 128 121 284 864 08:00 AM 24 51 14 89 36 102 84 222 86 184 39 309 29 109 86 224 844 08:15 AM 19 41 14 74 41 152 81 274 72 147 25 244 25 118 74 217 809 Total Volume 76 206 49 331 170 491 345 1006 264 615 116 995 125 467 383 975 3307 % App. Total 23 62.2 14.8 16.9 48.8 34.3 26.5 61.8 11.7 12.8 47.9 39.3 PHF .792 .904 .875 .930 .885 .808 .918 .918 .767 .836 .744 .805 .868 .912 .791 .858 .957 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1471 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1709 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 08_SJC_State_Ramona Expy AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
State Street
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
State Street
Right
49 Thru
206
Left
76 Out In Total
1085 331 1416
Right
345
Thru
491
Left
170
Out Total In
659 1006 1665
Left
264
Thru
615
Right
116
Out In Total
759 995 1754
Left
125
Thru
467
Right
383
Total Out In
804 975 1779
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 24 51 14 89 45 130 94 269 57 161 34 252 36 112 102 250 +15 mins. 19 41 14 74 48 107 86 241 86 184 39 309 35 128 121 284 +30 mins. 30 62 13 105 36 102 84 222 72 147 25 244 29 109 86 224 +45 mins. 19 51 21 91 41 152 81 274 54 131 13 198 25 118 74 217 Total Volume 92 205 62 359 170 491 345 1006 269 623 111 1003 125 467 383 975 % App. Total 25.6 57.1 17.3 16.9 48.8 34.3 26.8 62.1 11.1 12.8 47.9 39.3 PHF .767 .827 .738 .855 .885 .808 .918 .918 .782 .846 .712 .811 .868 .912 .791 .858 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1472 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1710 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 08_SJC_State_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
State Street
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 41 111 13 165 35 102 41 178 78 108 14 200 34 152 91 277 820 04:15 PM 55 84 14 153 24 100 47 171 78 97 20 195 26 149 93 268 787 04:30 PM 63 113 16 192 25 93 46 164 86 111 23 220 38 162 96 296 872 04:45 PM 42 103 20 165 34 109 32 175 79 125 19 223 22 187 100 309 872 Total 201 411 63 675 118 404 166 688 321 441 76 838 120 650 380 1150 3351 05:00 PM 51 109 10 170 39 130 49 218 83 117 23 223 30 163 77 270 881 05:15 PM 46 101 16 163 33 123 46 202 114 125 11 250 27 155 95 277 892 05:30 PM 48 109 18 175 21 74 41 136 87 92 14 193 32 131 76 239 743 05:45 PM 71 83 7 161 24 87 24 135 107 115 14 236 24 190 103 317 849 Total 216 402 51 669 117 414 160 691 391 449 62 902 113 639 351 1103 3365 Grand Total 417 813 114 1344 235 818 326 1379 712 890 138 1740 233 1289 731 2253 6716 Apprch % 31 60.5 8.5 17 59.3 23.6 40.9 51.1 7.9 10.3 57.2 32.4 Total % 6.2 12.1 1.7 20 3.5 12.2 4.9 20.5 10.6 13.3 2.1 25.9 3.5 19.2 10.9 33.5 State Street
Southbound
Ramona Expressway
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Expressway
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 63 113 16 192 25 93 46 164 86 111 23 220 38 162 96 296 872 04:45 PM 42 103 20 165 34 109 32 175 79 125 19 223 22 187 100 309 872 05:00 PM 51 109 10 170 39 130 49 218 83 117 23 223 30 163 77 270 881 05:15 PM 46 101 16 163 33 123 46 202 114 125 11 250 27 155 95 277 892 Total Volume 202 426 62 690 131 455 173 759 362 478 76 916 117 667 368 1152 3517 % App. Total 29.3 61.7 9 17.3 59.9 22.8 39.5 52.2 8.3 10.2 57.9 31.9 PHF .802 .942 .775 .898 .840 .875 .883 .870 .794 .956 .826 .916 .770 .892 .920 .932 .986 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1473 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1711 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 08_SJC_State_Ramona Expy PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Expressway
Weather: Clear
State Street
Ramona Expressway
Ramona Expressway
State Street
Right
62 Thru
426
Left
202
Out In Total
768 690 1458
Right
173
Thru
455
Left
131
Out Total In
945 759 1704
Left
362
Thru
478
Right
76 Out In Total
925 916 1841
Left
117
Thru
667
Right
368
Total Out In
879 1152 2031
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 63 113 16 192 25 93 46 164 86 111 23 220 38 162 96 296 +15 mins. 42 103 20 165 34 109 32 175 79 125 19 223 22 187 100 309 +30 mins. 51 109 10 170 39 130 49 218 83 117 23 223 30 163 77 270 +45 mins. 46 101 16 163 33 123 46 202 114 125 11 250 27 155 95 277 Total Volume 202 426 62 690 131 455 173 759 362 478 76 916 117 667 368 1152 % App. Total 29.3 61.7 9 17.3 59.9 22.8 39.5 52.2 8.3 10.2 57.9 31.9 PHF .802 .942 .775 .898 .840 .875 .883 .870 .794 .956 .826 .916 .770 .892 .920 .932 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1474 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1712 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 09_SJC_State_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
State Street
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 35 92 3 130 18 26 56 100 5 136 19 160 7 28 14 49 439 07:15 AM 30 108 2 140 22 30 46 98 10 165 31 206 11 48 11 70 514 07:30 AM 40 140 9 189 45 33 52 130 11 200 44 255 23 56 27 106 680 07:45 AM 46 177 2 225 50 48 55 153 7 197 24 228 16 45 20 81 687 Total 151 517 16 684 135 137 209 481 33 698 118 849 57 177 72 306 2320 08:00 AM 43 157 6 206 27 42 67 136 11 159 19 189 7 26 18 51 582 08:15 AM 30 126 4 160 22 31 35 88 21 152 11 184 13 30 48 91 523 08:30 AM 38 120 2 160 20 38 48 106 15 120 11 146 13 40 26 79 491 08:45 AM 46 136 5 187 31 36 42 109 8 86 10 104 16 27 25 68 468 Total 157 539 17 713 100 147 192 439 55 517 51 623 49 123 117 289 2064 Grand Total 308 1056 33 1397 235 284 401 920 88 1215 169 1472 106 300 189 595 4384 Apprch % 22 75.6 2.4 25.5 30.9 43.6 6 82.5 11.5 17.8 50.4 31.8 Total % 7 24.1 0.8 31.9 5.4 6.5 9.1 21 2 27.7 3.9 33.6 2.4 6.8 4.3 13.6 State Street
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 40 140 9 189 45 33 52 130 11 200 44 255 23 56 27 106 680 07:45 AM 46 177 2 225 50 48 55 153 7 197 24 228 16 45 20 81 687 08:00 AM 43 157 6 206 27 42 67 136 11 159 19 189 7 26 18 51 582 08:15 AM 30 126 4 160 22 31 35 88 21 152 11 184 13 30 48 91 523 Total Volume 159 600 21 780 144 154 209 507 50 708 98 856 59 157 113 329 2472 % App. Total 20.4 76.9 2.7 28.4 30.4 41.2 5.8 82.7 11.4 17.9 47.7 34.3 PHF .864 .847 .583 .867 .720 .802 .780 .828 .595 .885 .557 .839 .641 .701 .589 .776 .900 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1475 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1713 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 09_SJC_State_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
State Street
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
State Street
Right
21 Thru
600
Left
159
Out In Total
976 780 1756
Right
209
Thru
154
Left
144
Out Total In
414 507 921
Left
50 Thru
708
Right
98 Out In Total
857 856 1713
Left
59 Thru
157
Right
113
Total Out In
225 329 554
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM
+0 mins. 40 140 9 189 22 30 46 98 10 165 31 206 23 56 27 106 +15 mins. 46 177 2 225 45 33 52 130 11 200 44 255 16 45 20 81 +30 mins. 43 157 6 206 50 48 55 153 7 197 24 228 7 26 18 51 +45 mins. 30 126 4 160 27 42 67 136 11 159 19 189 13 30 48 91 Total Volume 159 600 21 780 144 153 220 517 39 721 118 878 59 157 113 329 % App. Total 20.4 76.9 2.7 27.9 29.6 42.6 4.4 82.1 13.4 17.9 47.7 34.3 PHF .864 .847 .583 .867 .720 .797 .821 .845 .886 .901 .670 .861 .641 .701 .589 .776 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1476 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1714 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 09_SJC_State_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
State Street
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 68 146 5 219 26 36 57 119 12 134 22 168 12 26 24 62 568 04:15 PM 42 166 3 211 32 33 60 125 16 110 19 145 8 31 25 64 545 04:30 PM 56 156 3 215 28 35 50 113 20 147 8 175 5 28 19 52 555 04:45 PM 53 155 6 214 27 22 47 96 21 141 15 177 11 26 20 57 544 Total 219 623 17 859 113 126 214 453 69 532 64 665 36 111 88 235 2212 05:00 PM 39 163 0 202 20 27 69 116 21 183 14 218 11 24 18 53 589 05:15 PM 49 155 7 211 36 33 58 127 21 145 16 182 6 20 24 50 570 05:30 PM 59 148 5 212 31 32 54 117 16 130 12 158 6 19 16 41 528 05:45 PM 56 131 0 187 25 30 68 123 18 135 11 164 15 29 18 62 536 Total 203 597 12 812 112 122 249 483 76 593 53 722 38 92 76 206 2223 Grand Total 422 1220 29 1671 225 248 463 936 145 1125 117 1387 74 203 164 441 4435 Apprch % 25.3 73 1.7 24 26.5 49.5 10.5 81.1 8.4 16.8 46 37.2 Total % 9.5 27.5 0.7 37.7 5.1 5.6 10.4 21.1 3.3 25.4 2.6 31.3 1.7 4.6 3.7 9.9 State Street
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
State Street
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 56 156 3 215 28 35 50 113 20 147 8 175 5 28 19 52 555 04:45 PM 53 155 6 214 27 22 47 96 21 141 15 177 11 26 20 57 544 05:00 PM 39 163 0 202 20 27 69 116 21 183 14 218 11 24 18 53 589 05:15 PM 49 155 7 211 36 33 58 127 21 145 16 182 6 20 24 50 570 Total Volume 197 629 16 842 111 117 224 452 83 616 53 752 33 98 81 212 2258 % App. Total 23.4 74.7 1.9 24.6 25.9 49.6 11 81.9 7 15.6 46.2 38.2 PHF .879 .965 .571 .979 .771 .836 .812 .890 .988 .842 .828 .862 .750 .875 .844 .930 .958 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1477 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1715 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 09_SJC_State_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: State Street
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
State Street
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
State Street
Right
16 Thru
629
Left
197
Out In Total
873 842 1715
Right
224
Thru
117
Left
111
Out Total In
348 452 800
Left
83 Thru
616
Right
53 Out In Total
821 752 1573
Left
33 Thru
98 Right
81 Total Out In
216 212 428
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 68 146 5 219 20 27 69 116 20 147 8 175 12 26 24 62 +15 mins. 42 166 3 211 36 33 58 127 21 141 15 177 8 31 25 64 +30 mins. 56 156 3 215 31 32 54 117 21 183 14 218 5 28 19 52 +45 mins. 53 155 6 214 25 30 68 123 21 145 16 182 11 26 20 57 Total Volume 219 623 17 859 112 122 249 483 83 616 53 752 36 111 88 235 % App. Total 25.5 72.5 2 23.2 25.3 51.6 11 81.9 7 15.3 47.2 37.4 PHF .805 .938 .708 .981 .778 .924 .902 .951 .988 .842 .828 .862 .750 .895 .880 .918 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1478 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1716 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 10_SJC_Tiger_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Tiger Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Tiger Lane
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Tiger Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 10 0 22 32 2 74 23 99 3 0 2 5 19 67 1 87 223
07:15 AM 32 0 27 59 0 87 34 121 3 1 3 7 49 64 1 114 301 07:30 AM 51 1 47 99 0 85 68 153 1 0 1 2 69 102 1 172 426 07:45 AM 71 1 45 117 4 116 65 185 4 0 5 9 53 91 1 145 456 Total 164 2 141 307 6 362 190 558 11 1 11 23 190 324 4 518 1406 08:00 AM 45 0 32 77 3 87 36 126 6 0 4 10 31 64 0 95 308 08:15 AM 19 0 18 37 2 80 21 103 2 0 3 5 19 67 2 88 233
08:30 AM 17 0 16 33 7 72 21 100 4 0 9 13 20 70 1 91 237 08:45 AM 19 0 31 50 4 82 21 107 3 0 2 5 23 73 5 101 263 Total 100 0 97 197 16 321 99 436 15 0 18 33 93 274 8 375 1041 Grand Total 264 2 238 504 22 683 289 994 26 1 29 56 283 598 12 893 2447 Apprch % 52.4 0.4 47.2 2.2 68.7 29.1 46.4 1.8 51.8 31.7 67 1.3 Total % 10.8 0.1 9.7 20.6 0.9 27.9 11.8 40.6 1.1 0 1.2 2.3 11.6 24.4 0.5 36.5 Tiger Lane
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Tiger Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 32 0 27 59 0 87 34 121 3 1 3 7 49 64 1 114 301 07:30 AM 51 1 47 99 0 85 68 153 1 0 1 2 69 102 1 172 426 07:45 AM 71 1 45 117 4 116 65 185 4 0 5 9 53 91 1 145 456 08:00 AM 45 0 32 77 3 87 36 126 6 0 4 10 31 64 0 95 308 Total Volume 199 2 151 352 7 375 203 585 14 1 13 28 202 321 3 526 1491 % App. Total 56.5 0.6 42.9 1.2 64.1 34.7 50 3.6 46.4 38.4 61 0.6 PHF .701 .500 .803 .752 .438 .808 .746 .791 .583 .250 .650 .700 .732 .787 .750 .765 .817 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1479 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1717 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 10_SJC_Tiger_Ramona Blvd AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Tiger Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Tiger Lane
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
Tiger Lane
Right
151
Thru
2 Left
199
Out In Total
406 352 758
Right
203
Thru
375
Left
7 Out Total In
533 585 1118
Left
14 Thru
1 Right
13 Out In Total
12 28 40
Left
202
Thru
321
Right
3 Total Out In
540 526 1066
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 32 0 27 59 0 87 34 121 4 0 5 9 49 64 1 114
+15 mins. 51 1 47 99 0 85 68 153 6 0 4 10 69 102 1 172
+30 mins. 71 1 45 117 4 116 65 185 2 0 3 5 53 91 1 145
+45 mins. 45 0 32 77 3 87 36 126 4 0 9 13 31 64 0 95
Total Volume 199 2 151 352 7 375 203 585 16 0 21 37 202 321 3 526 % App. Total 56.5 0.6 42.9 1.2 64.1 34.7 43.2 0 56.8 38.4 61 0.6 PHF .701 .500 .803 .752 .438 .808 .746 .791 .667 .000 .583 .712 .732 .787 .750 .765 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1480 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1718 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 10_SJC_Tiger_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Tiger Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Tiger Lane
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Tiger Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 18 0 20 38 6 100 10 116 4 0 2 6 16 111 5 132 292 04:15 PM 16 0 12 28 1 95 13 109 3 1 0 4 19 81 5 105 246 04:30 PM 17 0 21 38 4 93 6 103 2 0 4 6 10 98 1 109 256
04:45 PM 9 0 16 25 2 79 9 90 3 0 3 6 10 85 3 98 219
Total 60 0 69 129 13 367 38 418 12 1 9 22 55 375 14 444 1013 05:00 PM 7 0 7 14 2 103 10 115 1 0 3 4 8 79 4 91 224
05:15 PM 10 3 10 23 3 106 9 118 2 0 1 3 11 83 5 99 243
05:30 PM 8 0 19 27 4 91 5 100 2 0 6 8 8 87 4 99 234
05:45 PM 7 0 17 24 3 107 7 117 2 0 1 3 10 95 4 109 253
Total 32 3 53 88 12 407 31 450 7 0 11 18 37 344 17 398 954 Grand Total 92 3 122 217 25 774 69 868 19 1 20 40 92 719 31 842 1967 Apprch % 42.4 1.4 56.2 2.9 89.2 7.9 47.5 2.5 50 10.9 85.4 3.7 Total % 4.7 0.2 6.2 11 1.3 39.3 3.5 44.1 1 0.1 1 2 4.7 36.6 1.6 42.8 Tiger Lane
Southbound
Ramona Boulevard
Westbound
Tiger Lane
Northbound
Ramona Boulevard
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 18 0 20 38 6 100 10 116 4 0 2 6 16 111 5 132 292 04:15 PM 16 0 12 28 1 95 13 109 3 1 0 4 19 81 5 105 246 04:30 PM 17 0 21 38 4 93 6 103 2 0 4 6 10 98 1 109 256
04:45 PM 9 0 16 25 2 79 9 90 3 0 3 6 10 85 3 98 219
Total Volume 60 0 69 129 13 367 38 418 12 1 9 22 55 375 14 444 1013 % App. Total 46.5 0 53.5 3.1 87.8 9.1 54.5 4.5 40.9 12.4 84.5 3.2 PHF .833 .000 .821 .849 .542 .918 .731 .901 .750 .250 .563 .917 .724 .845 .700 .841 .867 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1481 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1719 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 10_SJC_Tiger_Ramona Blvd PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Tiger Lane
E/W: Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Tiger Lane
Ramona Boulevard
Ramona Boulevard
Tiger Lane
Right
69 Thru
0 Left
60 Out In Total
94 129 223
Right
38 Thru
367
Left
13 Out Total In
444 418 862
Left
12 Thru
1 Right
9 Out In Total
27 22 49
Left
55 Thru
375
Right
14 Total Out In
448 444 892
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:00 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 18 0 20 38 2 103 10 115 4 0 2 6 16 111 5 132
+15 mins. 16 0 12 28 3 106 9 118 3 1 0 4 19 81 5 105
+30 mins. 17 0 21 38 4 91 5 100 2 0 4 6 10 98 1 109
+45 mins. 9 0 16 25 3 107 7 117 3 0 3 6 10 85 3 98
Total Volume 60 0 69 129 12 407 31 450 12 1 9 22 55 375 14 444 % App. Total 46.5 0 53.5 2.7 90.4 6.9 54.5 4.5 40.9 12.4 84.5 3.2 PHF .833 .000 .821 .849 .750 .951 .775 .953 .750 .250 .563 .917 .724 .845 .700 .841 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1482 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1720 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 11_SJC_Lyon_Cotton AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Cottonwood Avenue
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 7 22 22 51 2 17 60 79 4 52 2 58 50 48 1 99 287 07:15 AM 24 41 62 127 0 22 64 86 6 66 4 76 71 73 2 146 435 07:30 AM 7 28 26 61 6 71 12 89 3 42 9 54 25 109 3 137 341 07:45 AM 9 26 30 65 8 76 2 86 11 44 6 61 33 86 3 122 334 Total 47 117 140 304 16 186 138 340 24 204 21 249 179 316 9 504 1397 08:00 AM 5 28 21 54 5 61 8 74 10 38 6 54 19 65 1 85 267 08:15 AM 4 17 22 43 4 49 2 55 3 25 1 29 20 54 3 77 204
08:30 AM 2 32 16 50 4 51 3 58 3 32 5 40 8 60 4 72 220
08:45 AM 5 27 20 52 5 45 2 52 10 23 4 37 10 47 3 60 201 Total 16 104 79 199 18 206 15 239 26 118 16 160 57 226 11 294 892 Grand Total 63 221 219 503 34 392 153 579 50 322 37 409 236 542 20 798 2289 Apprch % 12.5 43.9 43.5 5.9 67.7 26.4 12.2 78.7 9 29.6 67.9 2.5 Total % 2.8 9.7 9.6 22 1.5 17.1 6.7 25.3 2.2 14.1 1.6 17.9 10.3 23.7 0.9 34.9 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM
07:00 AM 7 22 22 51 2 17 60 79 4 52 2 58 50 48 1 99 287 07:15 AM 24 41 62 127 0 22 64 86 6 66 4 76 71 73 2 146 435 07:30 AM 7 28 26 61 6 71 12 89 3 42 9 54 25 109 3 137 341 07:45 AM 9 26 30 65 8 76 2 86 11 44 6 61 33 86 3 122 334 Total Volume 47 117 140 304 16 186 138 340 24 204 21 249 179 316 9 504 1397 % App. Total 15.5 38.5 46.1 4.7 54.7 40.6 9.6 81.9 8.4 35.5 62.7 1.8 PHF .490 .713 .565 .598 .500 .612 .539 .955 .545 .773 .583 .819 .630 .725 .750 .863 .803 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1483 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1721 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 11_SJC_Lyon_Cotton AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Cottonwood Avenue
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Cottonwood Avenue
Cottonwood Avenue
Lyon Avenue
Right
140
Thru
117
Left
47 Out In Total
521 304 825
Right
138
Thru
186
Left
16 Out Total In
384 340 724
Left
24 Thru
204
Right
21 Out In Total
142 249 391
Left
179
Thru
316
Right
9 Total Out In
350 504 854
Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 07:00 AM
+0 mins. 24 41 62 127 2 17 60 79 4 52 2 58 50 48 1 99
+15 mins. 7 28 26 61 0 22 64 86 6 66 4 76 71 73 2 146
+30 mins. 9 26 30 65 6 71 12 89 3 42 9 54 25 109 3 137
+45 mins. 5 28 21 54 8 76 2 86 11 44 6 61 33 86 3 122
Total Volume 45 123 139 307 16 186 138 340 24 204 21 249 179 316 9 504 % App. Total 14.7 40.1 45.3 4.7 54.7 40.6 9.6 81.9 8.4 35.5 62.7 1.8 PHF .469 .750 .560 .604 .500 .612 .539 .955 .545 .773 .583 .819 .630 .725 .750 .863 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1484 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1722 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 11_SJC_Lyon_Cotton PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Cottonwood Avenue
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 8 47 17 72 6 44 3 53 11 35 10 56 13 86 10 109 290 04:15 PM 8 44 17 69 4 49 3 56 7 38 5 50 13 70 12 95 270 04:30 PM 6 46 16 68 3 63 5 71 5 33 9 47 20 67 9 96 282
04:45 PM 6 51 10 67 3 71 3 77 5 29 10 44 13 50 10 73 261 Total 28 188 60 276 16 227 14 257 28 135 34 197 59 273 41 373 1103 05:00 PM 3 47 16 66 6 58 4 68 8 49 5 62 19 62 6 87 283
05:15 PM 3 39 16 58 9 52 4 65 7 58 4 69 17 51 9 77 269
05:30 PM 5 42 10 57 6 56 0 62 11 28 4 43 23 75 8 106 268 05:45 PM 8 48 13 69 6 58 1 65 7 35 4 46 11 76 9 96 276
Total 19 176 55 250 27 224 9 260 33 170 17 220 70 264 32 366 1096 Grand Total 47 364 115 526 43 451 23 517 61 305 51 417 129 537 73 739 2199 Apprch % 8.9 69.2 21.9 8.3 87.2 4.4 14.6 73.1 12.2 17.5 72.7 9.9 Total % 2.1 16.6 5.2 23.9 2 20.5 1 23.5 2.8 13.9 2.3 19 5.9 24.4 3.3 33.6 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Cottonwood Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:00 PM
04:00 PM 8 47 17 72 6 44 3 53 11 35 10 56 13 86 10 109 290 04:15 PM 8 44 17 69 4 49 3 56 7 38 5 50 13 70 12 95 270 04:30 PM 6 46 16 68 3 63 5 71 5 33 9 47 20 67 9 96 282
04:45 PM 6 51 10 67 3 71 3 77 5 29 10 44 13 50 10 73 261 Total Volume 28 188 60 276 16 227 14 257 28 135 34 197 59 273 41 373 1103 % App. Total 10.1 68.1 21.7 6.2 88.3 5.4 14.2 68.5 17.3 15.8 73.2 11 PHF .875 .922 .882 .958 .667 .799 .700 .834 .636 .888 .850 .879 .738 .794 .854 .856 .951 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1485 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1723 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 11_SJC_Lyon_Cotton PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Cottonwood Avenue
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Cottonwood Avenue
Cottonwood Avenue
Lyon Avenue
Right
60 Thru
188
Left
28 Out In Total
208 276 484
Right
14 Thru
227
Left
16 Out Total In
335 257 592
Left
28 Thru
135
Right
34 Out In Total
245 197 442
Left
59 Thru
273
Right
41 Total Out In
315 373 688
Peak Hour Begins at 04:00 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 8 47 17 72 3 63 5 71 5 33 9 47 13 86 10 109
+15 mins. 8 44 17 69 3 71 3 77 5 29 10 44 13 70 12 95
+30 mins. 6 46 16 68 6 58 4 68 8 49 5 62 20 67 9 96
+45 mins. 6 51 10 67 9 52 4 65 7 58 4 69 13 50 10 73
Total Volume 28 188 60 276 21 244 16 281 25 169 28 222 59 273 41 373 % App. Total 10.1 68.1 21.7 7.5 86.8 5.7 11.3 76.1 12.6 15.8 73.2 11 PHF .875 .922 .882 .958 .583 .859 .800 .912 .781 .728 .700 .804 .738 .794 .854 .856 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1486 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1724 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 12_SJC_San J_Main AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: San Jacinto Avenue
E/W: Main Street/Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
San Jacinto Avenue
Southbound
Main Street
Westbound
San Jacinto Avenue
Northbound
Main Street
Eastbound
Ramona Boulevard
Southeastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Hard Right App. Total Left Thru Bear Right Right App. Total Left Bear Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Bear Left Bear Right Hard Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 21 6 0 27 5 11 9 1 26 1 63 35 2 101 1 7 7 4 19 0 3 38 2 43 216 07:15 AM 0 51 5 0 56 5 12 16 0 33 0 85 47 2 134 0 6 8 2 16 0 7 54 1 62 301 07:30 AM 2 63 7 0 72 0 12 22 1 35 1 92 52 5 150 1 3 19 4 27 0 11 51 1 63 347 07:45 AM 3 74 9 4 90 6 14 14 0 34 0 87 46 3 136 0 10 11 8 29 2 8 66 3 79 368 Total 5 209 27 4 245 16 49 61 2 128 2 327 180 12 521 2 26 45 18 91 2 29 209 7 247 1232 08:00 AM 3 69 15 2 89 9 17 1 3 30 4 69 57 0 130 0 9 12 9 30 0 13 57 0 70 349 08:15 AM 4 69 9 0 82 3 18 10 2 33 4 64 45 3 116 0 4 17 7 28 1 14 43 1 59 318 08:30 AM 2 35 3 0 40 5 15 8 3 31 5 60 21 3 89 0 4 20 6 30 1 13 61 3 78 268 08:45 AM 0 29 3 0 32 9 12 9 3 33 1 60 37 5 103 0 4 15 3 22 0 8 49 1 58 248 Total 9 202 30 2 243 26 62 28 11 127 14 253 160 11 438 0 21 64 25 110 2 48 210 5 265 1183 Grand Total 14 411 57 6 488 42 111 89 13 255 16 580 340 23 959 2 47 109 43 201 4 77 419 12 512 2415 Apprch % 2.9 84.2 11.7 1.2 16.5 43.5 34.9 5.1 1.7 60.5 35.5 2.4 1 23.4 54.2 21.4 0.8 15 81.8 2.3 Total % 0.6 17 2.4 0.2 20.2 1.7 4.6 3.7 0.5 10.6 0.7 24 14.1 1 39.7 0.1 1.9 4.5 1.8 8.3 0.2 3.2 17.3 0.5 21.2 San Jacinto Avenue
Southbound
Main Street
Westbound
San Jacinto Avenue
Northbound
Main Street
Eastbound
Ramona Boulevard
Southeastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Hard Right App. Total Left Thru Bear Right Right App. Total Left Bear Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Bear Left Bear Right Hard Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 2 63 7 0 72 0 12 22 1 35 1 92 52 5 150 1 3 19 4 27 0 11 51 1 63 347 07:45 AM 3 74 9 4 90 6 14 14 0 34 0 87 46 3 136 0 10 11 8 29 2 8 66 3 79 368 08:00 AM 3 69 15 2 89 9 17 1 3 30 4 69 57 0 130 0 9 12 9 30 0 13 57 0 70 349 08:15 AM 4 69 9 0 82 3 18 10 2 33 4 64 45 3 116 0 4 17 7 28 1 14 43 1 59 318 Total Volume 12 275 40 6 333 18 61 47 6 132 9 312 200 11 532 1 26 59 28 114 3 46 217 5 271 1382 % App. Total 3.6 82.6 12 1.8 13.6 46.2 35.6 4.5 1.7 58.6 37.6 2.1 0.9 22.8 51.8 24.6 1.1 17 80.1 1.8 PHF .750 .929 .667 .375 .925 .500 .847 .534 .500 .943 .563 .848 .877 .550 .887 .250 .650 .776 .778 .950 .375 .821 .822 .417 .858 .939 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1487 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1725 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & File Name : 12_SJC_San J_Main AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: San Jacinto Avenue
E/W: Main Street/Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Ramona Boulevard San Jacinto Avenue Main Street
Main Street
San Jacinto Avenue
Hard
Right
6 Right
40 Thru
275
Left
12 Out In Total
235 333 568
Right
6 Right
Bear
47 Thru
61 Left
18 Out Total In
128 132 260
Left
9 Bear
Left
312
Thru
200
Right
11 Out In Total
538 532 1070
Hard
Left
1 Left
26 Thru
59 Right
28 Total Out In
115 114 229
Hard Right 5 Bear Right 217 Bear Left 46 Hard Left3
Out 366
In271
Total 637
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1488 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1726 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & File Name : 12_SJC_San J_Main AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 3
City of San Jacinto
N/S: San Jacinto Avenue
E/W: Main Street/Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
San Jacinto Avenue
Southbound
Main Street
Westbound
San Jacinto Avenue
Northbound
Main Street
Eastbound
Ramona Boulevard
Southeastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Hard Right App. Total Left Thru Bear Right Right App. Total Left Bear Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Bear Left Bear Right Hard Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:30 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:45 AM 07:45 AM
+0 mins. 2 63 7 0 72 5 12 16 0 33 0 85 47 2 134 0 10 11 8 29 2 8 66 3 79 +15 mins. 3 74 9 4 90 0 12 22 1 35 1 92 52 5 150 0 9 12 9 30 0 13 57 0 70 +30 mins. 3 69 15 2 89 6 14 14 0 34 0 87 46 3 136 0 4 17 7 28 1 14 43 1 59 +45 mins. 4 69 9 0 82 9 17 1 3 30 4 69 57 0 130 0 4 20 6 30 1 13 61 3 78 Total Volume 12 275 40 6 333 20 55 53 4 132 5 333 202 10 550 0 27 60 30 117 4 48 227 7 286 % App. Total 3.6 82.6 12 1.8 15.2 41.7 40.2 3 0.9 60.5 36.7 1.8 0 23.1 51.3 25.6 1.4 16.8 79.4 2.4 PHF .750 .929 .667 .375 .925 .556 .809 .602 .333 .943 .313 .905 .886 .500 .917 .000 .675 .750 .833 .975 .500 .857 .860 .583 .905 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1489 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1727 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & File Name : 12_SJC_San J_Main PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: San Jacinto Avenue
E/W: Main Street/Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
San Jacinto Avenue
Southbound
Main Street
Westbound
San Jacinto Avenue
Northbound
Main Street
Eastbound
Ramona Boulevard
Southeastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Hard Right App. Total Left Thru Bear Right Right App. Total Left Bear Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Bear Left Bear Right Hard Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 4 69 9 2 84 11 22 11 1 45 4 59 43 4 110 0 5 20 9 34 4 9 66 2 81 354 04:15 PM 1 65 7 1 74 10 10 8 3 31 8 59 48 3 118 0 3 21 2 26 0 13 50 1 64 313 04:30 PM 0 52 6 0 58 10 15 7 0 32 4 51 38 9 102 0 6 14 1 21 2 9 60 0 71 284 04:45 PM 3 54 13 1 71 10 15 12 2 39 4 68 54 7 133 0 5 15 1 21 2 11 43 0 56 320 Total 8 240 35 4 287 41 62 38 6 147 20 237 183 23 463 0 19 70 13 102 8 42 219 3 272 1271 05:00 PM 4 60 12 0 76 7 21 9 2 39 3 82 46 7 138 0 4 23 3 30 0 8 48 0 56 339 05:15 PM 1 45 5 0 51 8 19 4 0 31 2 76 68 7 153 0 2 22 9 33 1 7 61 0 69 337 05:30 PM 1 35 3 1 40 8 15 11 2 36 5 54 34 4 97 0 3 26 5 34 3 10 47 0 60 267 05:45 PM 2 34 0 0 36 7 17 16 5 45 2 69 35 3 109 1 1 18 5 25 0 17 47 0 64 279 Total 8 174 20 1 203 30 72 40 9 151 12 281 183 21 497 1 10 89 22 122 4 42 203 0 249 1222 Grand Total 16 414 55 5 490 71 134 78 15 298 32 518 366 44 960 1 29 159 35 224 12 84 422 3 521 2493 Apprch % 3.3 84.5 11.2 1 23.8 45 26.2 5 3.3 54 38.1 4.6 0.4 12.9 71 15.6 2.3 16.1 81 0.6 Total % 0.6 16.6 2.2 0.2 19.7 2.8 5.4 3.1 0.6 12 1.3 20.8 14.7 1.8 38.5 0 1.2 6.4 1.4 9 0.5 3.4 16.9 0.1 20.9 San Jacinto Avenue
Southbound
Main Street
Westbound
San Jacinto Avenue
Northbound
Main Street
Eastbound
Ramona Boulevard
Southeastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Hard Right App. Total Left Thru Bear Right Right App. Total Left Bear Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Bear Left Bear Right Hard Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 52 6 0 58 10 15 7 0 32 4 51 38 9 102 0 6 14 1 21 2 9 60 0 71 284 04:45 PM 3 54 13 1 71 10 15 12 2 39 4 68 54 7 133 0 5 15 1 21 2 11 43 0 56 320 05:00 PM 4 60 12 0 76 7 21 9 2 39 3 82 46 7 138 0 4 23 3 30 0 8 48 0 56 339 05:15 PM 1 45 5 0 51 8 19 4 0 31 2 76 68 7 153 0 2 22 9 33 1 7 61 0 69 337 Total Volume 8 211 36 1 256 35 70 32 4 141 13 277 206 30 526 0 17 74 14 105 5 35 212 0 252 1280 % App. Total 3.1 82.4 14.1 0.4 24.8 49.6 22.7 2.8 2.5 52.7 39.2 5.7 0 16.2 70.5 13.3 2 13.9 84.1 0 PHF .500 .879 .692 .250 .842 .875 .833 .667 .500 .904 .813 .845 .757 .833 .859 .000 .708 .804 .389 .795 .625 .795 .869 .000 .887 .944 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1490 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1728 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & File Name : 12_SJC_San J_Main PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: San Jacinto Avenue
E/W: Main Street/Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
Ramona Boulevard San Jacinto Avenue Main Street
Main Street
San Jacinto Avenue
Hard
Right
1 Right
36 Thru
211
Left
8 Out In Total
232 256 488
Right
4 Right
Bear
32 Thru
70 Left
35 Out Total In
147 141 288
Left
13 Bear
Left
277
Thru
206
Right
30 Out In Total
472 526 998
Hard
Left
0 Left
17 Thru
74 Right
14 Total Out In
119 105 224
Hard Right 0 Bear Right 212 Bear Left 35 Hard Left5
Out 310
In252
Total 562
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1491 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1729 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & File Name : 12_SJC_San J_Main PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 3
City of San Jacinto
N/S: San Jacinto Avenue
E/W: Main Street/Ramona Boulevard
Weather: Clear
San Jacinto Avenue
Southbound
Main Street
Westbound
San Jacinto Avenue
Northbound
Main Street
Eastbound
Ramona Boulevard
Southeastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right Hard Right App. Total Left Thru Bear Right Right App. Total Left Bear Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Left Thru Right App. Total Hard Left Bear Left Bear Right Hard Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 05:00 PM 04:30 PM 05:00 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 4 69 9 2 84 7 21 9 2 39 4 51 38 9 102 0 4 23 3 30 4 9 66 2 81 +15 mins. 1 65 7 1 74 8 19 4 0 31 4 68 54 7 133 0 2 22 9 33 0 13 50 1 64 +30 mins. 0 52 6 0 58 8 15 11 2 36 3 82 46 7 138 0 3 26 5 34 2 9 60 0 71 +45 mins. 3 54 13 1 71 7 17 16 5 45 2 76 68 7 153 1 1 18 5 25 2 11 43 0 56 Total Volume 8 240 35 4 287 30 72 40 9 151 13 277 206 30 526 1 10 89 22 122 8 42 219 3 272 % App. Total 2.8 83.6 12.2 1.4 19.9 47.7 26.5 6 2.5 52.7 39.2 5.7 0.8 8.2 73 18 2.9 15.4 80.5 1.1 PHF .500 .870 .673 .500 .854 .938 .857 .625 .450 .839 .813 .845 .757 .833 .859 .250 .625 .856 .611 .897 .500 .808 .830 .375 .840 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951) 268-6268
[email protected]

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1492 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1730 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & File Name : 13_SJC_Lyon_Esp AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Esplanade Avenue
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Esplanade Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Esplanade Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 2 23 8 33 10 59 11 80 1 38 12 51 3 80 4 87 251 07:15 AM 5 41 4 50 12 87 9 108 2 34 14 50 9 102 6 117 325 07:30 AM 6 34 10 50 10 78 8 96 8 36 12 56 7 89 3 99 301 07:45 AM 10 32 10 52 17 95 8 120 4 36 12 52 9 106 3 118 342 Total 23 130 32 185 49 319 36 404 15 144 50 209 28 377 16 421 1219 08:00 AM 8 22 5 35 12 69 10 91 7 42 11 60 9 89 3 101 287 08:15 AM 7 30 6 43 11 72 4 87 1 25 7 33 3 67 6 76 239
08:30 AM 4 26 8 38 13 85 4 102 2 28 6 36 12 83 7 102 278 08:45 AM 8 45 7 60 14 77 10 101 0 21 9 30 8 67 0 75 266 Total 27 123 26 176 50 303 28 381 10 116 33 159 32 306 16 354 1070 Grand Total 50 253 58 361 99 622 64 785 25 260 83 368 60 683 32 775 2289 Apprch % 13.9 70.1 16.1 12.6 79.2 8.2 6.8 70.7 22.6 7.7 88.1 4.1 Total % 2.2 11.1 2.5 15.8 4.3 27.2 2.8 34.3 1.1 11.4 3.6 16.1 2.6 29.8 1.4 33.9 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Esplanade Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Esplanade Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 AM
07:15 AM 5 41 4 50 12 87 9 108 2 34 14 50 9 102 6 117 325 07:30 AM 6 34 10 50 10 78 8 96 8 36 12 56 7 89 3 99 301 07:45 AM 10 32 10 52 17 95 8 120 4 36 12 52 9 106 3 118 342 08:00 AM 8 22 5 35 12 69 10 91 7 42 11 60 9 89 3 101 287 Total Volume 29 129 29 187 51 329 35 415 21 148 49 218 34 386 15 435 1255 % App. Total 15.5 69 15.5 12.3 79.3 8.4 9.6 67.9 22.5 7.8 88.7 3.4 PHF .725 .787 .725 .899 .750 .866 .875 .865 .656 .881 .875 .908 .944 .910 .625 .922 .917 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1493 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1731 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 13_SJC_Lyon_Esp AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Esplanade Avenue
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Esplanade Avenue
Esplanade Avenue
Lyon Avenue
Right
29 Thru
129
Left
29 Out In Total
217 187 404
Right
35 Thru
329
Left
51 Out Total In
464 415 879
Left
21 Thru
148
Right
49 Out In Total
195 218 413
Left
34 Thru
386
Right
15 Total Out In
379 435 814
Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM 07:15 AM
+0 mins. 5 41 4 50 12 87 9 108 2 34 14 50 9 102 6 117
+15 mins. 6 34 10 50 10 78 8 96 8 36 12 56 7 89 3 99
+30 mins. 10 32 10 52 17 95 8 120 4 36 12 52 9 106 3 118 +45 mins. 8 22 5 35 12 69 10 91 7 42 11 60 9 89 3 101
Total Volume 29 129 29 187 51 329 35 415 21 148 49 218 34 386 15 435 % App. Total 15.5 69 15.5 12.3 79.3 8.4 9.6 67.9 22.5 7.8 88.7 3.4 PHF .725 .787 .725 .899 .750 .866 .875 .865 .656 .881 .875 .908 .944 .910 .625 .922 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1494 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1732 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 13_SJC_Lyon_Esp PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Esplanade Avenue
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Esplanade Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Esplanade Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 10 62 5 77 26 91 10 127 5 51 21 77 7 108 6 121 402 04:15 PM 9 52 8 69 15 93 19 127 6 43 14 63 6 95 8 109 368 04:30 PM 7 59 4 70 17 93 14 124 2 46 16 64 9 100 7 116 374 04:45 PM 11 44 8 63 14 87 9 110 5 43 12 60 13 98 13 124 357 Total 37 217 25 279 72 364 52 488 18 183 63 264 35 401 34 470 1501 05:00 PM 15 46 3 64 13 104 31 148 0 52 16 68 15 96 7 118 398 05:15 PM 9 47 8 64 22 94 14 130 7 54 12 73 11 112 6 129 396 05:30 PM 10 44 4 58 19 101 19 139 4 32 21 57 4 99 1 104 358 05:45 PM 12 56 7 75 12 64 17 93 2 44 17 63 7 104 2 113 344 Total 46 193 22 261 66 363 81 510 13 182 66 261 37 411 16 464 1496 Grand Total 83 410 47 540 138 727 133 998 31 365 129 525 72 812 50 934 2997 Apprch % 15.4 75.9 8.7 13.8 72.8 13.3 5.9 69.5 24.6 7.7 86.9 5.4 Total % 2.8 13.7 1.6 18 4.6 24.3 4.4 33.3 1 12.2 4.3 17.5 2.4 27.1 1.7 31.2 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Esplanade Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Esplanade Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 7 59 4 70 17 93 14 124 2 46 16 64 9 100 7 116 374 04:45 PM 11 44 8 63 14 87 9 110 5 43 12 60 13 98 13 124 357 05:00 PM 15 46 3 64 13 104 31 148 0 52 16 68 15 96 7 118 398 05:15 PM 9 47 8 64 22 94 14 130 7 54 12 73 11 112 6 129 396 Total Volume 42 196 23 261 66 378 68 512 14 195 56 265 48 406 33 487 1525 % App. Total 16.1 75.1 8.8 12.9 73.8 13.3 5.3 73.6 21.1 9.9 83.4 6.8 PHF .700 .831 .719 .932 .750 .909 .548 .865 .500 .903 .875 .908 .800 .906 .635 .944 .958 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1495 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1733 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 13_SJC_Lyon_Esp PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of San Jacinto
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Esplanade Avenue
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Esplanade Avenue
Esplanade Avenue
Lyon Avenue
Right
23 Thru
196
Left
42 Out In Total
311 261 572
Right
68 Thru
378
Left
66 Out Total In
504 512 1016
Left
14 Thru
195
Right
56 Out In Total
295 265 560
Left
48 Thru
406
Right
33 Total Out In
415 487 902
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:45 PM 04:30 PM 04:30 PM
+0 mins. 10 62 5 77 14 87 9 110 2 46 16 64 9 100 7 116
+15 mins. 9 52 8 69 13 104 31 148 5 43 12 60 13 98 13 124 +30 mins. 7 59 4 70 22 94 14 130 0 52 16 68 15 96 7 118 +45 mins. 11 44 8 63 19 101 19 139 7 54 12 73 11 112 6 129 Total Volume 37 217 25 279 68 386 73 527 14 195 56 265 48 406 33 487 % App. Total 13.3 77.8 9 12.9 73.2 13.9 5.3 73.6 21.1 9.9 83.4 6.8 PHF .841 .875 .781 .906 .773 .928 .589 .890 .500 .903 .875 .908 .800 .906 .635 .944 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1496 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1734 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 14_HEM_Lyon_Florida AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of Hemet
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Florida Avenue
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Florida Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Florida Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 07:00 AM 10 20 6 36 5 91 5 101 9 19 8 36 9 81 3 93 266
07:15 AM 13 24 10 47 11 130 6 147 5 25 4 34 8 73 4 85 313 07:30 AM 14 26 10 50 9 144 7 160 6 36 6 48 11 112 4 127 385 07:45 AM 19 43 14 76 12 135 7 154 7 33 14 54 10 99 4 113 397 Total 56 113 40 209 37 500 25 562 27 113 32 172 38 365 15 418 1361 08:00 AM 18 30 8 56 9 118 11 138 4 33 7 44 9 141 9 159 397 08:15 AM 12 41 13 66 12 125 11 148 15 36 11 62 15 117 6 138 414 08:30 AM 8 41 14 63 16 141 7 164 9 22 16 47 12 138 12 162 436 08:45 AM 15 53 15 83 18 160 9 187 16 35 19 70 10 139 11 160 500 Total 53 165 50 268 55 544 38 637 44 126 53 223 46 535 38 619 1747 Grand Total 109 278 90 477 92 1044 63 1199 71 239 85 395 84 900 53 1037 3108 Apprch % 22.9 58.3 18.9 7.7 87.1 5.3 18 60.5 21.5 8.1 86.8 5.1 Total % 3.5 8.9 2.9 15.3 3 33.6 2 38.6 2.3 7.7 2.7 12.7 2.7 29 1.7 33.4 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Florida Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Florida Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 18 30 8 56 9 118 11 138 4 33 7 44 9 141 9 159 397 08:15 AM 12 41 13 66 12 125 11 148 15 36 11 62 15 117 6 138 414 08:30 AM 8 41 14 63 16 141 7 164 9 22 16 47 12 138 12 162 436 08:45 AM 15 53 15 83 18 160 9 187 16 35 19 70 10 139 11 160 500 Total Volume 53 165 50 268 55 544 38 637 44 126 53 223 46 535 38 619 1747 % App. Total 19.8 61.6 18.7 8.6 85.4 6 19.7 56.5 23.8 7.4 86.4 6.1 PHF .736 .778 .833 .807 .764 .850 .864 .852 .688 .875 .697 .796 .767 .949 .792 .955 .874 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1497 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1735 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 14_HEM_Lyon_Florida AM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of Hemet
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Florida Avenue
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Florida Avenue
Florida Avenue
Lyon Avenue
Right
50 Thru
165
Left
53 Out In Total
210 268 478
Right
38 Thru
544
Left
55 Out Total In
641 637 1278
Left
44 Thru
126
Right
53 Out In Total
258 223 481
Left
46 Thru
535
Right
38 Total Out In
638 619 1257
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
08:00 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM 08:00 AM
+0 mins. 18 30 8 56 9 118 11 138 4 33 7 44 9 141 9 159
+15 mins. 12 41 13 66 12 125 11 148 15 36 11 62 15 117 6 138 +30 mins. 8 41 14 63 16 141 7 164 9 22 16 47 12 138 12 162 +45 mins. 15 53 15 83 18 160 9 187 16 35 19 70 10 139 11 160 Total Volume 53 165 50 268 55 544 38 637 44 126 53 223 46 535 38 619 % App. Total 19.8 61.6 18.7 8.6 85.4 6 19.7 56.5 23.8 7.4 86.4 6.1 PHF .736 .778 .833 .807 .764 .850 .864 .852 .688 .875 .697 .796 .767 .949 .792 .955 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1498 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1736 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 14_HEM_Lyon_Florida PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 1
City of Hemet
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Florida Avenue
Weather: Clear
Groups Printed- Total Volume
Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Florida Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Florida Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total 04:00 PM 19 46 26 91 37 217 14 268 21 42 20 83 19 197 14 230 672 04:15 PM 21 47 27 95 22 197 15 234 18 44 15 77 17 233 11 261 667 04:30 PM 22 53 21 96 30 204 12 246 19 49 19 87 26 235 6 267 696 04:45 PM 19 49 19 87 22 190 19 231 20 43 26 89 20 220 10 250 657 Total 81 195 93 369 111 808 60 979 78 178 80 336 82 885 41 1008 2692 05:00 PM 18 35 26 79 30 243 17 290 20 49 28 97 27 172 13 212 678 05:15 PM 20 50 17 87 17 191 15 223 16 44 11 71 23 219 12 254 635 05:30 PM 15 37 19 71 22 178 11 211 19 42 18 79 23 231 10 264 625 05:45 PM 14 50 17 81 18 193 20 231 16 31 7 54 20 189 11 220 586 Total 67 172 79 318 87 805 63 955 71 166 64 301 93 811 46 950 2524 Grand Total 148 367 172 687 198 1613 123 1934 149 344 144 637 175 1696 87 1958 5216 Apprch % 21.5 53.4 25 10.2 83.4 6.4 23.4 54 22.6 8.9 86.6 4.4 Total % 2.8 7 3.3 13.2 3.8 30.9 2.4 37.1 2.9 6.6 2.8 12.2 3.4 32.5 1.7 37.5 Lyon Avenue
Southbound
Florida Avenue
Westbound
Lyon Avenue
Northbound
Florida Avenue
Eastbound
Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 21 47 27 95 22 197 15 234 18 44 15 77 17 233 11 261 667 04:30 PM 22 53 21 96 30 204 12 246 19 49 19 87 26 235 6 267 696 04:45 PM 19 49 19 87 22 190 19 231 20 43 26 89 20 220 10 250 657 05:00 PM 18 35 26 79 30 243 17 290 20 49 28 97 27 172 13 212 678 Total Volume 80 184 93 357 104 834 63 1001 77 185 88 350 90 860 40 990 2698 % App. Total 22.4 51.5 26.1 10.4 83.3 6.3 22 52.9 25.1 9.1 86.9 4 PHF .909 .868 .861 .930 .867 .858 .829 .863 .963 .944 .786 .902 .833 .915 .769 .927 .969 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1499 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1737 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) File Name : 14_HEM_Lyon_Florida PM
Site Code : 10522259
Start Date : 3/24/2022
Page No : 2
City of Hemet
N/S: Lyon Avenue
E/W: Florida Avenue
Weather: Clear
Lyon Avenue
Florida Avenue
Florida Avenue
Lyon Avenue
Right
93 Thru
184
Left
80 Out In Total
338 357 695
Right
63 Thru
834
Left
104
Out Total In
1028 1001 2029
Left
77 Thru
185
Right
88 Out In Total
328 350 678
Left
90 Thru
860
Right
40 Total Out In
1004 990 1994
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Total Volume
Peak Hour Data
North
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Each Approach Begins at:
04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:15 PM 04:00 PM
+0 mins. 19 46 26 91 22 197 15 234 18 44 15 77 19 197 14 230 +15 mins. 21 47 27 95 30 204 12 246 19 49 19 87 17 233 11 261 +30 mins. 22 53 21 96 22 190 19 231 20 43 26 89 26 235 6 267 +45 mins. 19 49 19 87 30 243 17 290 20 49 28 97 20 220 10 250 Total Volume 81 195 93 369 104 834 63 1001 77 185 88 350 82 885 41 1008 % App. Total 22 52.8 25.2 10.4 83.3 6.3 22 52.9 25.1 8.1 87.8 4.1 PHF .920 .920 .861 .961 .867 .858 .829 .863 .963 .944 .786 .902 .788 .941 .732 .944 Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
Corona, CA 92878
(951)268-6268

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1500 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1738 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Appendix C
Existing Conditions
Intersection Analysis Worksheets

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1501 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1739 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.514
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 23.0
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Warren Road / Ramona Expressway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes No
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Warren Road Warren Road Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1502 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1740 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 315 1 283 0 1 0 1 442 153 176 686 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 79 0 71 0 0 0 0 111 38 44 172 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 0.9810 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 309 1 278 0 1 0 1 434 150 173 673 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 309 1 278 0 1 0 1 434 150 173 673 0 Name Warren Road Warren Road Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1503 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1741 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.6 5.8 0.0 2.6 5.8 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 1.5 3.0 0.0 1.5 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 31 0 0 31 0 10 22 0 37 49 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 3.6 5.8 0.0 3.6 5.8 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 6 0 0 6 0 5 8 0 5 8 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1504 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1742 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 285.10 241.74 0.73 1.46 133.17 92.75 176.80 170.26 170.26 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 11.40 9.67 0.03 0.06 5.33 3.71 7.07 6.81 6.81 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 176.24 143.51 0.40 0.81 73.98 51.53 98.22 94.59 94.59 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 7.05 5.74 0.02 0.03 2.96 2.06 3.93 3.78 3.78 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Group LOSDCCDBBDBB
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 38.13 33.16 25.66 52.69 17.11 16.87 41.97 12.17 12.17 X, volume / capacity 0.79 0.73 0.00 0.21 0.29 0.22 0.83 0.33 0.33 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 5.07 1.94 0.00 7.86 0.47 0.75 3.18 0.88 0.88 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.16 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 33.06 31.22 25.66 44.82 16.63 16.12 38.78 11.29 11.29 c, Capacity [veh/h] 398 390 4995 1535 685 212 1024 1024 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1416 1590 1870 1781 3560 1589 1781 1870 1870 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.22 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.18 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.12 0.55 0.55 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 22 22 220 39 39 11 49 49
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.60 5.80 5.80 2.60 5.80 5.80 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 6.00 6.00 6.00 4.60 7.80 7.80 4.60 7.80 7.80 C, Cycle Length [s] 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Lane GroupLCCLCRLCC
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1505 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1743 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 38.13 33.16 33.16 25.66 25.66 25.66 52.69 17.11 16.87 41.97 12.17 12.17 Movement LOS D C C C C C D B B D B B
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 35.78 25.66 17.11 18.25
Approach LOS D C B B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 23.02
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.514
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 10.0 0.0 15.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 35.57 0.00 31.27 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.243 0.000 3.156 0.000 Crosswalk LOS B F C F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 555 555 315 915 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 23.49 23.49 31.94 13.24
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.548 1.561 2.051 2.271 Bicycle LOS B A B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 - 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 - 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1506 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1744 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.764
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 31.2
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 2: Sanderson Avenue / Ramona Expressway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Sanderson Avenue Sanderson Avenue Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1507 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1745 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 137 696 28 524 585 223 345 304 49 21 503 377 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 34 174 7 131 146 56 86 76 12 5 126 94 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 0.9890 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 135 688 28 518 579 221 341 301 48 21 497 373 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 135 688 28 518 579 221 341 301 48 21 497 373 Name Sanderson Avenue Sanderson Avenue Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1508 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1746 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.7 5.0 5.0 2.7 5.0 5.0 2.7 5.0 5.0 2.7 5.0 5.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0 7 7
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Split [s] 10 29 29 22 41 41 16 17 17 27 28 28
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Amber [s] 3.7 6.0 6.0 3.7 6.0 6.0 3.7 6.0 6.0 3.7 6.0 6.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
Minimum Green [s] 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups 2,3 6,7 4,5 1,8
Signal Group 5 2 2 1 6 6 7 4 4 3 8 8
Control Type Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Overlap Protecte Permiss Overlap Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 95
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1509 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1747 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 72.83 297.39 18.27 246.33 202.45 94.78 180.22 124.67 30.14 11.21 241.07 263.69 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.91 11.90 0.73 9.85 8.10 3.79 7.21 4.99 1.21 0.45 9.64 10.55 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 40.46 185.66 10.15 146.93 114.65 52.65 100.12 69.26 16.75 6.23 143.01 159.98 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.62 7.43 0.41 5.88 4.59 2.11 4.00 2.77 0.67 0.25 5.72 6.40 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes Lane Group LOS D C B D C A D C B D D C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 45.79 33.83 18.55 38.62 20.51 9.20 42.72 28.43 18.17 46.25 39.91 22.33 X, volume / capacity 0.70 0.68 0.05 0.83 0.40 0.23 0.83 0.33 0.08 0.26 0.85 0.56 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.69 3.70 0.14 1.11 0.81 0.56 1.73 0.07 0.02 0.60 1.36 1.47 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.22 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 44.10 30.13 18.41 37.51 19.69 8.64 40.99 28.36 18.15 45.64 38.54 20.85 c, Capacity [veh/h] 196 1020 610 630 1467 962 413 932 623 82 591 671 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3459 3560 1589 3459 3560 1589 3459 3560 1589 3459 3560 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.04 0.20 0.02 0.15 0.16 0.14 0.10 0.09 0.03 0.01 0.14 0.24 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.06 0.29 0.38 0.18 0.41 0.61 0.12 0.26 0.39 0.02 0.17 0.42 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 5 27 36 17 39 58 11 25 37 2 16 40 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.70 5.00 0.00 2.70 5.00 0.00 2.70 5.00 0.00 2.70 5.00 0.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.70 7.00 4.70 4.70 7.00 4.70 4.70 7.00 4.70 4.70 7.00 4.70 C, Cycle Length [s] 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1510 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1748 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 45.79 33.83 18.55 38.62 20.51 9.20 42.72 28.43 18.17 46.25 39.91 22.33 Movement LOS D C B D C A D C B D D C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 35.23 25.74 34.77 32.70
Approach LOS D C C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 31.21
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.764
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 37.18 37.18 37.18 37.18
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.807 2.979 2.814 2.841 Crosswalk LOS C C C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 463 715 210 442 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 28.09 19.63 38.07 28.87
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.270 2.659 2.135 2.303 Bicycle LOS B B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1511 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1749 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.403
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 3: Sanderson Avenue / Ramona Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Sanderson Avenue Sanderson Avenue Ramona Boulevard Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1512 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1750 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 795 26 84 662 64 125
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 199 6 21 165 16 31
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9260 0.9260 0.9260 0.9260 0.9260 0.9260 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 736 24 78 613 59 116
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 736 24 78 613 59 116
Name Sanderson Avenue Sanderson Avenue Ramona Boulevard Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1513 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1751 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0
Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Split [s] 11 0 11 22 68 0
All red [s] 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Amber [s] 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 30 0 30 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 7 0 7 7 7 0
Lead / Lag - - Lead - Lead -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 6 0 5 2 7 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Protected Permissive Permissive Permissive Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1514 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1752 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 114.90 6.20 90.84 38.61 60.92 133.54 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.60 0.25 3.63 1.54 2.44 5.34 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 63.83 3.45 50.47 21.45 33.84 74.19 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 2.55 0.14 2.02 0.86 1.35 2.97 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOSAADADD
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 5.79 4.34 47.35 2.24 38.62 46.17 X, volume / capacity 0.32 0.02 0.68 0.23 0.35 0.76
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.35 0.04 6.42 0.19 1.11 6.92 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.11 0.11
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 5.44 4.30 40.93 2.05 37.51 39.25
c, Capacity [veh/h] 2470 1102 123 2875 185 165
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 3560 1589 1781 3560 1781 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.22 0.02 0.05 0.19 0.04 0.08 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.69 0.69 0.07 0.81 0.10 0.10
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 63 636 7399
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 90 90 90 90 90 90
Lane GroupCRLCLR
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1515 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1753 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 5.79 4.34 47.35 2.24 38.62 46.17 Movement LOSAADADD
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 5.74 7.32 43.61
Approach LOSAAD
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 10.49
Intersection LOSB
Intersection V/C 0.403
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOSFFF
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 156 400 1422 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 38.28 28.81 3.76
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.237 2.175 1.560 Bicycle LOSBBA
Ring 4----------------
Ring 3----------------
Ring 2567-------------
Ring 1-2--------------
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1516 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1754 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.023
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 10.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Two-way stop
Intersection 4: Ranch View Lane / Ramona Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Left Right Thru Right Left Thru
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Ranch View Lane Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 15 11 153 5 3 181
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 3 38 1 1 45
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9350 0.9350 0.9350 0.9350 0.9350 0.9350 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 14 10 143 5 3 169
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 10 143 5 3 169
Name Ranch View Lane Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard
Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1517 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1755 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Intersection LOS
B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.77
Approach LOSBAA
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.07 0.00 0.12
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 2.75 2.75 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 Movement LOSBAAAAA
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 10.70 9.22 0.00 0.00 7.54 0.00 V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Number of Storage Spaces in Median000
Two-Stage Gap Acceptance No
Storage Area [veh]000
Flared Lane No
Priority Scheme Stop Free Free
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1518 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1756 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.369
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 13.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 5: Potter Road / Ramona Expressway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Lyon Avenue Potter Road Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1519 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1757 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 172 8 110 4 3 7 2 913 78 53 816 7 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 43 2 27 1 1 2 1 228 19 13 204 2 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 0.9120 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 157 7 100 4 3 6 2 833 71 48 744 6 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 157 7 100 4 3 6 2 833 71 48 744 6 Name Lyon Avenue Potter Road Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1520 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1758 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.5 0.0 2.0 2.5 0.0 2.0 4.5 0.0 2.0 4.5 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 17 0 0 17 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 10 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 3.0 0.0 4.0 3.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 Split [s] 17 51 0 9 43 0 9 31 0 9 31 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 3.0 3.5 0.0 3.0 3.5 0.0 3.0 5.5 0.0 3.0 5.5 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 6 0 5 6 0 5 6 0 5 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 3 8 0 7 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1521 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1759 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 193.98 130.03 8.35 3.88 9.70 3.13 120.74 27.93 63.99 90.73 2.07 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 7.76 5.20 0.33 0.16 0.39 0.13 4.83 1.12 2.56 3.63 0.08 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 108.55 72.24 4.64 2.16 5.39 1.74 67.08 15.52 35.55 50.41 1.15 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.34 2.89 0.19 0.09 0.22 0.07 2.68 0.62 1.42 2.02 0.05 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No Yes No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOSDDEDEEAADAA
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 47.05 44.27 79.38 50.22 55.21 61.98 8.06 6.92 53.85 6.37 5.25 X, volume / capacity 0.84 0.59 0.38 0.11 0.29 0.34 0.28 0.08 0.76 0.24 0.01 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 3.62 2.81 29.81 1.61 6.46 12.21 0.21 0.15 6.23 0.16 0.01 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.11 0.15 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 43.43 41.46 49.56 48.61 48.75 49.76 7.84 6.77 47.62 6.21 5.24 c, Capacity [veh/h] 204 199 10 28 246 3267 1019 70 3449 1076 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1606 1781 1870 1589 1781 5094 1589 1781 5094 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.10 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.05 0.03 0.16 0.00 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.11 0.12 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.04 0.68 0.68 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 11 121110 64 644 68 68
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.50 2.00 2.50 2.50 2.00 4.50 4.50 2.00 4.50 4.50 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.50 4.00 4.50 4.50 4.00 6.50 6.50 4.00 6.50 6.50 C, Cycle Length [s] 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Lane GroupLCLCRLCRLCR
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1522 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1760 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 47.05 44.27 44.27 79.38 50.22 55.21 61.98 8.06 6.92 53.85 6.37 5.25 Movement LOS D D D E D E E A A D A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 45.91 61.04 8.08 9.24
Approach LOS D E A A
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 13.93
Intersection LOS B
Intersection V/C 0.369
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 14.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 39.62 39.62 37.00 39.62
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.083 2.143 2.970 2.962 Crosswalk LOS B B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 930 770 490 490 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 14.33 18.93 28.52 28.52
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.038 1.583 2.106 2.041 Bicycle LOS B A B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1523 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1761 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.441
Level Of Service: B
Delay (sec / veh): 11.5
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 6: Lyon Avenue / Ramona Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 47 226 49 12 97 15 27 122 68 39 101 40 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 12 57 12 3 24 4 7 31 17 10 25 10 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 0.9730 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 46 220 48 12 94 15 26 119 66 38 98 39 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 46 220 48 12 94 15 26 119 66 38 98 39 Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1524 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1762 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Intersection LOS
B
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 11.54
Approach LOSBBBB
Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.48 10.86 10.34 11.76
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 6.82 56.33 20.05 25.55 8.53 32.13 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 0.27 2.25 0.80 1.02 0.34 1.29 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.08 0.44 0.21 0.26 0.10 0.31
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 562 624 581 578 663 590 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1525 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1763 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.923
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 27.7
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 7: Lyon Avenue / De Anza Drive
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Turning Movement Thru Right Left Thru Left Right
Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound
Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue De Anza Drive
Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 385 300 33 260 151 59
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 96 75 8 65 38 15
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.7240 0.7240 0.7240 0.7240 0.7240 0.7240 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 279 217 24 188 109 43
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 279 217 24 188 109 43
Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue De Anza Drive
Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1526 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1764 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Intersection LOS
D
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 27.73
Approach LOSEBB
Approach Delay [s/veh] 38.64 13.23 12.37
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 321.20 59.72 32.90 8.45 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 12.85 2.39 1.32 0.34 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.92 0.46 0.31 0.10
Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 742 642 485 581
Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1527 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1765 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.634
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 45.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 8: State Street / Ramona Expressway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name State Street State Street Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1528 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1766 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 276 643 121 79 215 51 131 488 400 178 513 361 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 69 161 30 20 54 13 33 122 100 44 128 90 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 0.9570 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 264 615 116 76 206 49 125 467 383 170 491 345 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 264 615 116 76 206 49 125 467 383 170 491 345 Name State Street State Street Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1529 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1767 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 31 0 0 29 0 0 19 0 0 18 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Split [s] 16 48 0 10 42 0 10 32 0 10 32 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 4.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 4 0 4 5 0 5 5 0 5 5 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 3 8 0 7 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 100
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1530 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1768 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 596.60 306.65 114.63 98.03 139.56 134.62 74.61 96.46 276.93 122.35 101.97 247.43 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 23.86 12.27 4.59 3.92 5.58 5.38 2.98 3.86 11.08 4.89 4.08 9.90 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 371.56 192.80 63.68 54.46 77.53 74.79 41.45 53.59 170.01 67.97 56.65 147.76 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 14.86 7.71 2.55 2.18 3.10 2.99 1.66 2.14 6.80 2.72 2.27 5.91 Critical Lane Group Yes No No No No Yes No No Yes Yes No No Lane Group LOS F D C E D D D B C F B C
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 227.84 40.27 34.64 56.52 40.11 40.26 49.23 15.46 21.11 69.56 15.56 20.04 X, volume / capacity 1.40 0.89 0.37 0.87 0.50 0.52 0.74 0.20 0.53 1.01 0.21 0.48 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 183.30 1.51 0.27 9.32 0.54 0.61 2.34 0.19 2.66 22.02 0.20 2.17 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 44.54 38.76 34.37 47.21 39.56 39.65 46.89 15.27 18.45 47.53 15.36 17.87 c, Capacity [veh/h] 197 725 324 91 269 252 176 2419 755 176 2419 755 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 3560 1589 1781 1870 1749 3459 5094 1589 3459 5094 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.15 0.18 0.08 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.10 0.25 0.05 0.10 0.23 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.11 0.20 0.20 0.05 0.14 0.14 0.05 0.48 0.48 0.05 0.48 0.48 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 11 20 20 5 14 14 5 48 48 5 48 48 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 6.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Lane Group L C R L C C L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1531 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1769 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 227.84 40.27 34.64 56.52 40.16 40.26 49.23 15.46 21.11 69.56 15.56 20.04 Movement LOS F D C E D D D B C F B C
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 89.39 43.92 22.02 26.23
Approach LOS F D C C
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 45.76
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.634
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 39.65 39.65 39.65 39.65
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.756 2.593 3.055 3.043 Crosswalk LOS C B C C
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 839 719 520 520 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 16.85 20.52 27.42 27.42
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.418 1.844 2.120 2.138 Bicycle LOS B A B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1532 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1770 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.608
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 35.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 9: State Street / Ramona Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name State Street State Street Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1533 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1771 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 56 787 109 177 667 23 66 174 126 160 171 232 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 197 27 44 167 6 16 44 31 40 43 58 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 0.9000 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 50 708 98 159 600 21 59 157 113 144 154 209 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 50 708 98 159 600 21 59 157 113 144 154 209 Name State Street State Street Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1534 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1772 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 4.0 4.0 0.0 2.5 4.0 0.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 34 0 0 34 0 0 19 0 0 19 0
Walk [s] 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 18 50 0 18 50 0 10 34 0 18 42 0
All red [s] 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 5.0 5.0 0.0 3.5 5.0 0.0 3.5 4.0 0.0 4.0 4.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 8 0 5 8 0 5 6 0 5 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 5 2 0 1 6 0 7 4 0 3 8 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1535 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1773 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 89.13 343.75 332.49 247.05 227.11 225.13 105.35 236.05 175.24 226.35 207.90 288.79 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 3.57 13.75 13.30 9.88 9.08 9.01 4.21 9.44 7.01 9.05 8.32 11.55 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 49.52 221.66 212.85 147.47 132.66 131.21 58.53 139.28 97.36 132.10 118.60 179.06 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.98 8.87 8.51 5.90 5.31 5.25 2.34 5.57 3.89 5.28 4.74 7.16 Critical Lane Group No No Yes Yes No No Yes No No No No Yes Lane Group LOS E C C E B B E E E E D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 71.51 21.91 21.99 64.11 15.35 15.36 72.25 59.70 56.10 63.27 46.12 53.92 X, volume / capacity 0.76 0.49 0.49 0.88 0.33 0.33 0.80 0.82 0.70 0.85 0.52 0.83 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 14.55 1.86 1.94 11.65 0.86 0.87 15.57 7.66 4.84 10.46 1.27 6.20 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 56.96 20.06 20.06 52.46 14.49 14.49 56.68 52.04 51.26 52.82 44.85 47.71 c, Capacity [veh/h] 74 931 892 201 1041 1029 83 212 180 187 329 280 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1870 1791 1781 1870 1848 1781 1870 1589 1781 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.03 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.15 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.56 0.56 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.18 0.18 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 5 60 60 14 67 67 6 14 14 13 21 21 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.50 4.00 4.00 2.50 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 6.00 6.00 6.00 4.50 6.00 6.00 4.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 Lane Group L C C L C C L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1536 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1774 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 71.51 21.95 21.99 64.11 15.36 15.36 72.25 59.70 56.10 63.27 46.12 53.92 Movement LOS E C C E B B E E E E D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 24.87 25.31 60.72 54.21
Approach LOS C C E D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 35.79
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.608
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 46.84 46.84 46.84 46.84
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.683 2.692 2.293 2.392 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 733 733 483 616 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 24.09 24.09 34.52 28.72
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.345 2.275 2.164 2.489 Bicycle LOS B B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1537 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1775 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.805
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 54.3
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 10: Tiger Lane / Ramona Boulevard
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes Yes No
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Tiger Lane Tiger Lane Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1538 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1776 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 17 1 16 244 2 185 247 393 4 9 459 248 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 4 0 4 61 1 46 62 98 1 2 115 62 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 0.8170 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 14 1 13 199 2 151 202 321 3 7 375 203 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 14 1 13 199 2 151 202 321 3 7 375 203 Name Tiger Lane Tiger Lane Ramona Boulevard Ramona Boulevard Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1539 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1777 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 13 0
Walk [s] 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 11 0 0 30 0 22 68 0 11 57 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 120
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1540 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1778 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 43.19 375.92 278.51 327.63 260.68 14.55 806.13 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 1.73 15.04 11.14 13.11 10.43 0.58 32.25 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 24.00 247.03 171.22 209.07 157.70 8.08 604.51 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.96 9.88 6.85 8.36 6.31 0.32 24.18 Critical Lane Group Yes Yes No Yes No No Yes
Lane Group LOSDFEEBEE
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 45.29 86.31 70.99 64.67 16.14 65.43 56.81 X, volume / capacity 0.13 0.91 0.78 0.92 0.39 0.33 0.97 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.09 36.13 21.92 14.34 0.75 6.95 22.59 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.12 0.34 0.11 0.40 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 44.20 50.19 49.08 50.33 15.39 58.48 34.21 c, Capacity [veh/h] 254 268 239 267 1028 27 732
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1688 1781 1592 1781 1867 1781 1761 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.02 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.21 0.01 0.40 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.55 0.02 0.42 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 18 18 18 18 662 50
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 120 120 120 120 120 120 120
Lane GroupCLCLCLC
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1541 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1779 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 45.29 45.29 45.29 86.31 70.99 70.99 64.67 16.14 16.14 65.43 56.81 56.81 Movement LOS D D D F E E E B B E E E
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 45.29 79.67 34.75 56.92
Approach LOS D E C E
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 54.25
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.805
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 0.0 11.0 11.0 0.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 49.51 49.51 0.00
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 0.000 2.255 2.378 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F B B F
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 117 433 1067 883 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 53.21 36.82 13.07 18.71
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.616 2.271 2.622 2.741 Bicycle LOS A B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - - 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 2 6 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1542 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1780 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 1.098
Level Of Service: F
Delay (sec / veh): 61.4
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: All-way stop
Intersection 11: Lyon Avenue / Cottonwood Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk No Yes No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 45.00 45.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Cottonwood Avenue Cottonwood Avenue Intersection Setup
Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 30 254 26 59 146 174 223 394 11 20 232 172 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 7 64 7 15 36 44 56 98 3 5 58 43 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 0.8030 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 24 204 21 47 117 140 179 316 9 16 186 138 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 24 204 21 47 117 140 179 316 9 16 186 138 Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Cottonwood Avenue Cottonwood Avenue Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1543 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1781 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Intersection LOS F
Intersection Delay [s/veh] 61.38
Approach LOS E C F F
Approach Delay [s/veh] 47.54 17.06 65.01 105.74
95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 193.11 14.23 43.32 50.58 94.42 331.59 379.87 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 7.72 0.57 1.73 2.02 3.78 13.26 15.19 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Degree of Utilization, x 0.84 0.16 0.38 0.42 0.60 1.04 1.10 Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 369 365 385 416 370 405 424 Lanes
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1544 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1782 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.682
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 49.9
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 12: San Jacinto Avenue / Ramona Boulevard / Main Street Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left2 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Right2 Left2 Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound
Name San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto Avenue Main Street
Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1545 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1783 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume along the le 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume along th 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing th 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10 332 213 12 13 293 43 6 1 28 63 30 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 83 53 3 3 73 11 2 0 7 16 7 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 9 312 200 11 12 275 40 6 1 26 59 28 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 9 312 200 11 12 275 40 6 1 26 59 28 Name San Jacinto Avenue San Jacinto Avenue Main Street
Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1546 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1784 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No
Maximum Recall No No No
Minimum Recall No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 0 14 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 14 0
Walk [s] 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 Split [s] 0 0 27 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 27 0
All red [s] 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 0 30 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0
Control Type Split Split Split Split Split Split Split Split Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 125
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1547 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1785 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 332.35 219.15 470.08 178.45 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 13.29 8.77 18.80 7.14 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 212.75 126.81 322.76 99.14 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.51 5.07 12.91 3.97 Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes No
Lane Group LOSCCEE
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 33.25 29.22 68.10 58.77 X, volume / capacity 0.51 0.33 0.93 0.63
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 2.83 1.25 19.49 4.05
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.13
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 30.41 27.97 48.60 54.72
c, Capacity [veh/h] 665 692 381 193
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1853 1822 1585
(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.19 0.12 0.19 0.08 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.37 0.37 0.21 0.10
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 47 47 26 12
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.60 3.60 3.60 3.10
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.60 5.60 5.60 5.10
C, Cycle Length [s] 125 125 125 125
Lane GroupLCCC
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1548 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1786 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle LOS A B A
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.947 2.135 1.715 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 42.96 37.36 42.55
c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 342 454 350 s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 Crosswalk LOS B B A
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.353 2.194 1.850 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 52.02 52.02 52.02
M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0
Other Modes
Intersection V/C 0.682
Intersection LOS D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 49.93
Approach LOS C E E
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 31.65 68.10 58.77
Movement LOS C C C C E E E E E E E E
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 33.25 33.25 29.22 29.22 68.10 68.10 68.10 68.10 58.77 58.77 58.77 58.77 Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1549 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1787 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Crosswalk Yes Yes
Curb Present No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket00000000
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket00000000
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Right2 Left2 Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Westbound Southeastbound
Name Main Street Ramona Boulevard
Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1550 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1788 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume along the le 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume along th 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing th 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 19 65 50 6 3 49 231 5
Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 5 16 13 2 1 12 58 1
Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 0.9390 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 18 61 47 6 3 46 217 5
Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 18 61 47 6 3 46 217 5
Name Main Street Ramona Boulevard
Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1551 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1789 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pedestrian Recall No No
Maximum Recall No No
Minimum Recall No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 14 0 0 0 0 24 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Split [s] 0 27 0 0 0 0 37 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0
Amber [s] 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0
Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 0 0 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0
Control Type Permissive Permissive Permissive Permissive Split Split Split Split Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 125
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1552 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1790 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 202.77 65.31 301.71 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 8.11 2.61 12.07
50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 114.88 36.28 188.98 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 4.60 1.45 7.56
Critical Lane Group Yes No Yes
Lane Group LOSEDE
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 59.94 47.48 56.53
X, volume / capacity 0.68 0.20 0.89
Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00
d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00
d2, Incremental Delay [s] 4.79 0.15 3.91
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00
k, delay calibration 0.13 0.04 0.04
d1, Uniform Delay [s] 55.15 47.34 52.62
c, Capacity [veh/h] 205 255 266
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1729 1781 1863
(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.08 0.03 0.13
g / C, Green / Cycle 0.10 0.14 0.14
g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 12 18 18
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 3.10 3.60 3.60
l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 0.00
L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 5.10 5.60 5.60
C, Cycle Length [s] 125 125 125
Lane GroupCLC
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1553 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1791 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 59.94 59.94 59.94 59.94 47.48 47.48 56.53 56.53 Movement LOS E E E E D D E E
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 59.94 54.90
Approach LOS E D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 49.93
Intersection LOS D
Intersection V/C 0.682
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00
M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00
d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 52.02 52.02
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 1.866 2.217 Crosswalk LOS A B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 350 502
d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 42.55 35.07
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.781 1.954 Bicycle LOS A A
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1554 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1792 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.439
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 22.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 13: Lyon Avenue / Esplande Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Esplande Avenue Esplande Avenue Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1555 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1793 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 23 161 53 32 141 32 37 421 16 56 359 38 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 6 40 13 8 35 8 9 105 4 14 90 10 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 0.9170 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 21 148 49 29 129 29 34 386 15 51 329 35 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 21 148 49 29 129 29 34 386 15 51 329 35 Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Esplande Avenue Esplande Avenue Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1556 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1794 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No No No
Minimum Recall Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.5 3.3 0.0 2.5 3.3 0.0 2.5 3.3 0.0 2.5 3.3 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 21 0 0 21 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 1.5 3.0 0.0 1.5 3.0 0.0 1.5 3.0 0.0 1.5 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 10 36 0 10 36 0 10 34 0 10 34 0
All red [s] 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 4.0 4.3 0.0 4.0 4.3 0.0 4.0 4.3 0.0 4.0 4.3 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 7 30 0 7 30 0 6 30 0 6 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 5 6 0 5 6 0 5 6 0 5 6 0
Lead / Lag Lead - - Lead - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 3 8 0 7 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 16.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1557 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1795 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 24.49 168.94 49.80 33.74 140.17 29.20 38.99 188.45 5.59 59.90 149.29 13.09 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.98 6.76 1.99 1.35 5.61 1.17 1.56 7.54 0.22 2.40 5.97 0.52 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 13.60 93.86 27.66 18.75 77.87 16.22 21.66 104.69 3.10 33.28 82.94 7.27 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.54 3.75 1.11 0.75 3.11 0.65 0.87 4.19 0.12 1.33 3.32 0.29 Critical Lane Group No Yes No Yes No No No Yes No Yes No No Lane Group LOS D D D D D D D B A D A A
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 46.89 44.87 37.69 46.58 40.98 36.19 46.64 10.37 7.39 48.07 9.38 7.23 X, volume / capacity 0.52 0.77 0.30 0.58 0.64 0.17 0.61 0.38 0.02 0.75 0.32 0.04 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 3.52 5.98 0.93 3.54 3.09 0.43 3.73 0.97 0.03 5.43 0.73 0.08 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 43.37 38.88 36.76 43.04 37.89 35.76 42.91 9.40 7.36 42.64 8.65 7.16 c, Capacity [veh/h] 44 208 177 55 220 187 60 1118 950 75 1133 963 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1781 1870 1589 1781 1870 1589 1781 1870 1589 1781 1870 1589 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.01 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.23 0.01 0.03 0.19 0.02 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.03 0.60 0.60 0.04 0.61 0.61 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2 10 10 3 11 11 3 54 54 4 55 55 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.50 3.30 3.30 2.50 3.30 3.30 2.50 3.30 3.30 2.50 3.30 3.30 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.50 5.30 5.30 4.50 5.30 5.30 4.50 5.30 5.30 4.50 5.30 5.30 C, Cycle Length [s] 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1558 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1796 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 46.89 44.87 37.69 46.58 40.98 36.19 46.64 10.37 7.39 48.07 9.38 7.23 Movement LOS D D D D D D D B A D A A
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 43.46 41.11 13.10 13.98
Approach LOS D D B B
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 22.84
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.439
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.68 34.68 34.68 34.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.240 2.238 2.347 2.364 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 682 682 638 638 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 19.54 19.54 20.88 20.88
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.951 1.898 2.342 2.307 Bicycle LOS A A B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 5 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 1 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1559 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1797 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.362
Level Of Service: C
Delay (sec / veh): 30.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 14: Lyon Avenue / Florida Avenue
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes Yes Yes Yes
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Florida Avenue Florida Avenue Intersection Setup
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1560 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1798 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 50 144 61 61 189 57 53 612 43 63 622 43 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 13 36 15 15 47 14 13 153 11 16 156 11 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 0.8740 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 44 126 53 53 165 50 46 535 38 55 544 38 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 44 126 53 53 165 50 46 535 38 55 544 38 Name Lyon Avenue Lyon Avenue Florida Avenue Florida Avenue Volumes
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1561 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1799 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 23 0 0 21 0 0 16 0 0 19 0
Walk [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0 0 7 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 34 0 0 34 0 26 45 0 11 30 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 7 0 0 7 0 7 7 0 7 7 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 8 0 7 4 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1562 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1800 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 23.17 54.23 22.24 27.52 73.18 20.73 55.82 294.37 289.90 66.58 296.36 291.81 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.93 2.17 0.89 1.10 2.93 0.83 2.23 11.77 11.60 2.66 11.85 11.67 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 12.87 30.13 12.36 15.29 40.66 11.52 31.01 183.34 179.91 36.99 184.87 181.38 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 0.51 1.21 0.49 0.61 1.63 0.46 1.24 7.33 7.20 1.48 7.39 7.26 Critical Lane Group No No No No Yes No No No Yes Yes No No Lane Group LOS B A A B A A D D D D D D
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 11.02 8.28 7.84 10.59 8.58 7.82 45.00 39.15 39.32 45.38 38.60 38.75 X, volume / capacity 0.07 0.13 0.06 0.09 0.17 0.06 0.51 0.84 0.85 0.56 0.84 0.84 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.22 0.24 0.13 0.24 0.33 0.12 3.85 4.99 5.15 4.39 4.72 4.87 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 10.80 8.04 7.71 10.35 8.25 7.69 41.16 34.16 34.17 41.00 33.88 33.89 c, Capacity [veh/h] 671 1111 944 707 1111 944 104 392 383 112 401 392 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1134 1870 1589 1177 1870 1589 1781 1870 1827 1781 1870 1828 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.04 0.08 0.04 0.05 0.10 0.04 0.03 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.18 0.18 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.21 0.21 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 54 54 54 54 54 54 5 19 19 6 19 19 l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 C, Cycle Length [s] 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Lane Group L C R L C R L C C L C C
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1563 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1801 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results
d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.02 8.28 7.84 10.59 8.58 7.82 45.00 39.23 39.32 45.38 38.67 38.75 Movement LOS B A A B A A D D D D D D
d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.71 8.84 39.67 39.26
Approach LOS A A D D
d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 30.83
Intersection LOS C
Intersection V/C 0.362
Other Modes
g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 34.68 34.68 34.68 34.68
I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.265 2.264 2.651 2.671 Crosswalk LOS B B B B
s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 666 666 911 578 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 20.01 20.01 13.35 22.77
I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.980 2.066 2.144 2.160 Bicycle LOS A B B B
Ring 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 3 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 2 - 6 7 8 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ring 1 - 2 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - -
Sequence
Scenario 1: 1 EX AM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1564 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1802 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Volume to Capacity (v/c): 0.615
Level Of Service: D
Delay (sec / veh): 49.8
Analysis Period: 15 minutes
Analysis Method: HCM 6th Edition
Control Type: Signalized
Intersection 1: Warren Road / Ramona Expressway
Intersection Level Of Service Report
Crosswalk Yes No Yes No
Curb Present No No No No
Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00
Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Configuration
Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound
Name Warren Road Warren Road Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Intersection Setup
Scenario 2: 2 EX PM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1565 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1803 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0
v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0 0 0 0
v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0 0 0 0
v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0 0 0 0
Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Presence of On-Street Parking No No No No No No No No
Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 160 0 249 2 1 1 0 779 321 281 554 0 Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 40 0 62 1 0 0 0 195 80 70 139 0 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Peak Hour Factor 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 0.9940 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 159 0 248 2 1 1 0 774 319 279 551 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In-Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Base Volume Input [veh/h] 159 0 248 2 1 1 0 774 319 279 551 0 Name Warren Road Warren Road Ramona Expressway Ramona Expressway Volumes
Scenario 2: 2 EX PM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1566 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1804 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0
Pedestrian Walk [s] 0
Pedestrian Signal Group 0
Exclusive Pedestrian Phase
I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No
Maximum Recall No No No No No No
Minimum Recall No No No No No No
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 2.6 5.8 0.0 2.6 5.8 0.0 l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No
Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Walk [s] 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Vehicle Extension [s] 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 1.5 3.0 0.0 1.5 3.0 0.0 Split [s] 0 45 0 0 45 0 10 24 0 21 35 0
All red [s] 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 Amber [s] 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 3.6 5.8 0.0 3.6 5.8 0.0 Maximum Green [s] 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 30 0 30 30 0
Minimum Green [s] 0 6 0 0 6 0 5 8 0 5 8 0
Lead / Lag - - - - - - Lead - - Lead - -
Auxiliary Signal Groups
Signal Group 0 8 0 0 4 0 5 2 0 1 6 0
Control Type Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Protecte Permiss Permiss Phasing & Timing
Lost time [s] 12.00
Permissive Mode SingleBand
Offset Reference Lead Green - Beginning of First Green
Offset [s] 0.0
Actuation Type Fully actuated
Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated
Cycle Length [s] 90
Signal Coordination Group -
Located in CBD No
Intersection Settings
Scenario 2: 2 EX PM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

4.1.r
Packet Pg. 1567 Attachment: Appendix I - Traffic Impact Study (McLeish Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022))

5.1.i
Packet Pg. 1805 Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report (McLeish Ranch Planned Development Permit & Tentative Tract Map 38203 (P22-022)) 95th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 502.30 237.44 3.29 0.00 245.15 214.60 257.62 106.75 106.75 95th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 20.09 9.50 0.13 0.00 9.81 8.58 10.30 4.27 4.27 50th-Percentile Queue Length [ft/ln] 279.06 140.31 1.83 0.00 146.05 123.48 155.40 59.30 59.30 50th-Percentile Queue Length [veh/ln] 11.16 5.61 0.07 0.00 5.84 4.94 6.22 2.37 2.37 Critical Lane Group No Yes No No Yes No Yes No No
Lane Group LOSFDCABCDAA
d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 431.59 40.88 31.14 0.00 19.55 20.23 39.76 8.49 8.49 X, volume / capacity 1.87 0.85 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.46 0.89 0.24 0.24 Lane Group Results
PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 397.66 5.31 0.09 0.00 1.17 2.23 3.54 0.50 0.50 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 k, delay calibration 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.50 0.50 d1, Uniform Delay [s] 33.93 35.57 31.05 0.00 18.38 18.00 36.22 7.98 7.98 c, Capacity [veh/h] 86 292 1181 1549 692 315 1143 1143
s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 1415 1589 317 1781 3560 1589 1781 1870 1870 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.11 0.16 0.01 0.00 0.22 0.20 0.16 0.15 0.15 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.18 0.61 0.61 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 16 16 160 39 39 16 55 55
l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 4.00 4.00 4.00 2.60 5.80 5.80 2.60 5.80 5.80 l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 6.00 6.00 6.00 4.60 7.80 7.80 4.60 7.80 7.80 C, Cycle Length [s] 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Lane GroupLCCLCRLCC
Lane Group Calculations
Scenario 2: 2 EX PM
McLeish Ranch TIA, City of San Jacinto
Version 2022 (SP 0-2)
Generated with

San Jacinto City CouncilFebruary 4, 2025

San Jacinto City Council
February 4, 2025