US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 36 of 50 Detailed Scope
• Surface conditions; and
• Subsurface conditions encountered;
> Groundwater;
> As-built data;
> Corrosion considerations for the proposed retaining walls; > Scour;
> Seismic hazards evaluation including ground motion parameters developed from ARS-online, seismic parameters for slope stability analyses, as well as the potential for fault rupture, liquefaction, liquefaction induced lateral spreading, and seismic slope instability;
> Geotechnical recommendations including:
• Geotechnical design parameters;
• Subexcavation and foundation soil stabilization for retaining wall areas, if needed; • Suitable foundation and design recommendations for the proposed retaining walls based on the preferred wall type. Spread footing data tables (if needed) for the proposed walls including factored bearing resistance for the Strength and Extreme limit states as well as settlement due to net bearing pressure for the Service limit state. Net allowable bearing resistance versus footing width for service state limit; • Notes for Specifications and Construction or reference to standard specifications for materials discussed in the report (compacted fill, foundation preparation).
Task 18.11.3 - Draft Foundation Report (FR) - US 101 OC/Ramps at Prado Road Yeh will prepare a draft Foundation Report (FR) for the design of the US 101 overcrossing structure and ramps. Field exploration and laboratory testing for the proposed overcrossing and ramp structures will be performed under task B1.
The report will provide conclusions and recommendations regarding:
> Project Description including location, bridge type, and foundation type(s); > Geotechnical exploration and laboratory testing;
> Geotechnical conditions including:
• Site geology;
• Surface conditions; and
• Subsurface conditions encountered;
> Groundwater;
> As-built data;
> Scour data;
> Corrosion test results for the bridge designer use with Caltrans design methods to select cement type, minimum cement contents, and cover, and the need for protective coatings on reinforcement bars; > Seismic information including ground motion parameters developed from ARS-online, seismic parameters for slope stability analyses and abutment design, as well as the potential for fault rupture, liquefaction, liquefaction induced lateral spreading, and seismic slope instability;
> Design recommendations for the selected bridge foundation type such as spread footings, driven piles, rock-socketed and/ or cast-in-drilled hole piles, as needed;
• Shallow foundation design plots of bearing resistance versus footing width, and tabulated foundation data and bearing elevations (if needed.)
• Deep foundation design plots of bearing resistance versus pile depth for requested pile diameters, pile data table, minimum pile embedment and diameter, pile spacing and group effects, and specified pile tip elevation for load
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 37 of 50 Detailed Scope
demands provided by others (if needed);
• Recommended input parameters and p-y curve models for use with deep foundation analyses by the bridge designer (if needed);
> Notes for Specifications and Construction including anticipated pile driving and/or CIDH drilling conditions as well as temporary shoring.
TASK 18.12 - SOIL AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
This task includes developing a soil sampling plan, conducting sampling and analysis of the soil and preparing a soil and groundwater management plan. These scope items are necessary to comply with Hazard Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 of the approved IS-MND. This task will be led by Rincon with Yeh providing the drilling for the soil sampling.
A Soil Sampling Work Plan (Work Plan) for evaluating shallow soil (i.e., 3 feet below ground surface [bgs] or less) for aerially deposited lead, organochlorine pesticides (OCPs), herbicides, and arsenic in accordance with Hazard Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 in the IS-MND will be developed and submitted to the City and Caltrans for review and approval. The Work Plan will detail the proposed sampling locations, depths, and laboratory analytical testing. The Work Plan will also include a health and safety plan (HASP), which will outline the procedures that Ricon field personnel will follow to minimize the potential for health and safety hazards during the course of work to be performed. The need for this plan is mandated by federal law.
Soil sampling and analysis will be done in accordance with an approved Soil Sampling Work Plan. Rincon will provide qualified personnel to collect soil samples for environmental analysis from the 32 proposed geotechnical borings and to advance and collect soil samples from one additional hand auger boring to a depth of 3 feet bgs.
It is assumed that soil sampling and analysis required in the Work Plan will include the following:
> Advancing one boring to 3 feet bgs using a stainless-steel hand auger. > Collection of soil samples at 0.5, 1.0, and 3.0 feet bgs from up to 32 soil borings that will be advanced at the project by others as part of a geotechnical investigation.
> Analysis of up to 66 soil samples for total lead by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) test method 6020; 33 soil samples for OCPs by USEPA test method 8081A and herbicides by USEPA test method 8151A; and eight soil samples for total arsenic by USEPA test method 6020 on a standard 10 business day turnaround time. > Additional analysis of up to 15 soil samples for soluble lead by the Waste Extraction Text for the Soluble Threshold Limit Concentration or by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure on a standard 10 business day turnaround time.
> Environmental sampling activities will not exceed 13 field days. > Samples collected at 3.0 feet bgs will be held at the laboratory and analyzed, if needed based upon the results of the shallower soil samples. Costs for analysis of these samples is not included in this estimate.
A Soil Sampling and Analysis Report summarizing the results of the field activities performed and including tabulated data, figures, and recommendations for additional assessment or remediation of impacted soil identified during the investigation, if applicable will be prepared. The Soil Sampling and Analysis Report will be submitted to the City and Caltrans for preliminary review and revised in response to up to two rounds of consolidated comments.
In accordance with Hazard Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 and HAZ-2 and based on the location of the project within a known tetrachloroethylene (PCE) groundwater plume, the team will prepare a Soil and Groundwater Management Plan (SGMP) for the project that will include measures for the on-site handling and management of impacted soils, groundwater, or other impacted wastes, if encountered, and for reducing hazards to construction workers and off-site receptors during construction. The SGMP will establish remedial measures and/or soil and groundwater management practices to ensure construction worker safety, the health of future workers and visitors, and prevent the off-site migration of contaminants from the site. These measures and practices may include, but are not limited to:
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 38 of 50 Detailed Scope
> Stockpile management, including stormwater pollution prevention and the installation of best management practices; > Collection of and analyzing groundwater samples during dewatering; > Proper transportation and disposal procedures of impacted soil, groundwater, or other impacted materials in accordance with applicable regulations, including California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22; > Monitoring and reporting; and
> A health and safety plan for contractors working at the site that addresses the safety and health hazards of each phase of site construction activities with the requirements and procedures for employee protection and outlines proper soil and groundwater handling procedures and health and safety requirements to minimize worker and public exposure to hazardous materials during construction.
The SGMP will also serve as a contingency plan to address potential impacts related to known petroleum pipelines present on the project in accordance with Hazard Mitigation Measure HAZ-3.
The SGMP will be submitted to the City and Caltrans for preliminary review and revised in response to up to two rounds of consolidated comments,. Subsequent to the approval of the City and Caltrans, the SGMP will be submitted to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) for their review and approval prior and revised in response to up to one round of comments from the DTSC.
TASK 18.13 - RESPONSE TO COMMENTS (2)
A Draft 65% Submittal will be made to the City and Caltrans for their review. Our team has assumed we will receive consolidated comments. We will address these comments and submit a Draft Final 65% submittal, which will be reviewed.
Upon receiving the second set of consolidated comments, the team will address the applicable comments and submit a Final 65% submittal. At each submittal, our team will prepare a comment response form. The form will include the location of the comment, a summary of the comment, who is responsible for the response, and the response to the comment.
TASK 18.14 – CALTRANS 65% CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW
We will coordinate with Caltrans design oversight staff to schedule and conduct the Caltrans 65% Constructability Review.
This task includes meeting coordination, attendance, presenting the project at the meeting, producing meeting notes and developing a response to comments.
TASK 18.15 - 65% SUBMITTAL TO OSFP
Consor will assemble and submit the 65% plans to Caltrans OSFP for review. Submittals and review duration is expected to be in accordance with the OSFP Information and Procedures Guide.
TASK 18.16 - REGULATORY PERMITTING
Consor and Rincon will take the lead in assisting the City to obtain necessary permits for the project. We will prepare draft permit applications/notifications including supporting graphics and technical write-ups, attend agency meetings, as required, prepare meeting materials, and provide general regulatory and technical advice.
Based on our understanding of the project, we assume that the following permits will be required for this project: LSAA from CDFW and WDRs Permit from RWQCB. We also assume, based on review of the Natural Environment Study and ISMND, that a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) will be required to address minor impacts to riparian vegetation. Other possible permits necessary may include a Nationwide Permit (NWP) from the United States Army Corps of Engineers and filing notification of the project with the RWQCB or submittal of an application for Water Quality Certification if the applicable NWP is not pre- certified. This may also trigger the need for federal Endangered Species Act consultation(s) with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries Service. At this time, however, we assume that all work would occur outside federal jurisdiction.
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 39 of 50 Detailed Scope
TASK 18 DELIVERABLES
> Draft, Draft Final and Final 65% Plans (Roadway, Structures, Drainage, Stormwater treatment, Signals/Lighting, Landscape, Wet Utilities, Aesthetic Details) (PDF)
> Comment Response Matrix (2)
> Engineers Opinion of Probable Cost
> List of Caltrans Technical Special Provisions Draft Final Bridge Design Hydraulics Report (PDF) > Draft Final Stormwater Data Report (PDF)
> Draft Drainage Report (PDF)
> Draft Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) (PDF)
> Draft Foundation Reports (FR) for ERS and US 101 OC/Ramps (PDF) > Draft and Final Soil Sampling Work Plan (PDF)
> Draft and Final Soil Sampling Analysis Report (PDF)
> Draft and Final SGMP (PDF)
> 65% Caltrans Constructability Review Submittal
> 65% Submittal to Caltrans OSFP
> Completed permit application forms and exhibits as noted above (i.e., LSAA notification and WDRs Permit application).
> Draft and final HMMP.
> Meeting(s) minutes with regulatory agencies and the City Task 19.0 - Final Aesthetic Development This task includes finalizing the Aesthetic vision for the Prado Road corridor and gaining consensus for that vision from City staff, Caltrans, and the City Advisory Boards, such as the Architecture Review Committee, City Planning Commission, Downtown SLO, and the Chamber of Commerce.
TASK 19.1 - FINAL RENDERINGS OF AESTHETIC TREATMENTS
During Phase I, the vision for the corridor will have been determined through input from City staff, Caltrans and the Public. Items such as Aesthetic Lighting, Decorative treatments for Bridge Supports and railings, Hardscape and Landscape for the roadway medians and buffer areas, and decorative and contrasting elements applied to the sidewalks and bicycle paths will have been incorporated into renderings. During this task, the renderings will be finalized. We will produce a Draft Final Rendering of the preferred alternative to present to City Staff, Caltrans, and City Advisory Bodies.
Our scope assumes that the preferred option determined in Phase I will not require significant revisions as part of this task. The construction plans and details for the treatments will be developed as part of the various PS&E packages as part of Phase II.
TASK 19.2 - CITY/CALTRANS REVIEW MEETING (1)
The team will meet with City and Caltrans staff to review the Draft Final renderings of the preferred alternative. It is assumed that Caltrans Landscape Architects will be in attendance at this meeting.
TASK 19.3 - ADVISORY BODY PRESENTATION AND RENDERINGS
Our team will prepare a presentation to be shown to a maximum of four (4) Advisory Board Meetings. The presentation would be similar to the one given at the public meeting and Advisory Body meetings in Phase I. Although the graphics would be updated to the preferred alternative. It is anticipated that Apexx would present the Vision for the corridor and the technical team would be there as support. We have assumed that the aesthetic treatments would be presented at the Advisory Body meetings discussed in Task 22.
TASK 19.4 - FINAL AESTHETIC REPORT
Upon receiving comments from City and Caltrans staff and City Advisory Board members, we will address the feedback and
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 40 of 50 Detailed Scope
update the Aesthetics Report prepared in Phase I. Renderings and cost estimates will be updated as well as documenting the feedback received. Our scope assumes two rounds of consolidated comments on the Final Aesthetics Report.
TASK 19 DELIVERABLES
> Final Renderings for Preferred Alternative
> Attendance, Agenda and Meeting Notes for one meeting with City Staff and Caltrans Staff > Presentation development for City Advisory Body meetings > Draft Final and Final Aesthetic Report (PDF)
Task 20.0 - 90% PS&E Submittal
TASK 20.1 - INDEPENDENT STRUCTURES CHECK
Consor will address comments from the 65% submittal and update the PS&E accordingly. Once comments have been incorporated, Consor will perform an independent design check of the structure plans in conformance with usual Caltrans bridge design procedures. The check will involve a completely independent analysis of the project using the unchecked bridge detailed plans and 65% roadway plans by a licensed engineer that has not been intimately involved in the design.
The independent check engineer will prepare an independent set of calculations. A plan set will be marked up following Consor’s QA/QC Manual. Based upon the independent check and agreement to revisions by the checker and designer, the plans will be revised. Independent check comments are summarized, and resolutions are documented.
TASK 20.2 - 90% ROADWAY, SIGNAL/LIGHTING DESIGN & PLANS After the 65% review is completed and all comments have been compiled, Consor will make necessary revisions to the roadway plans in accordance with those comments and prepare a response to all comments following the required format used in Caltrans review processes.
Once comments from the 65% submittal have been incorporated, Consor will perform an independent check of the roadway plans. An engineer that has not been involved in the design will perform a completely independent analysis of the project details using the 65% plans. This is an important part of the team’s QA/QC Plan.
Based upon the independent check and agreement to revisions by the checker and designer, the plans will be revised. The Project Manager will ensure that all comments are adequately addressed and resolved.
TASK 20.3 - 90% DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER PLANS
Drainage and Stormwater treatment plans will be updated to incorporate comments from the 65% review. A review of the plan sheets will be completed to verify conflicts with underground utilities have been minimized or avoided.
TASK 20.4 - 90% WET UTILITY PLANS
The Consor Wet Utility Team will advance the plans forward to 90% completion. Modifications will be incorporated into the plans. A Senior level engineer will review the wet utility plans to look for conflicts with other project elements and perform an independent check of the design details.
TASK 20.5 - 90% STRUCTURES PLANS
After the 65% review is completed, comments from the City and Caltrans have been compiled and the independent structures check comments have been reconciled Consor will make necessary revisions to the structure plans in accordance with those comments and prepare a response to all comments.
TASK 20.6 - 90% LANDSCAPE PLANS
Following the conclusion of the 65% review meeting Wallace Group will work with the project team to produce a Comment Resolution form which will assemble the written/reconciled 65% PS&E comments received. Designers will record responses
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 41 of 50 Detailed Scope
to comments as well as record final dispositions that verify final dispositions have been implemented.
The 65% plans will be updated to a 90% submittal level based on appropriate written comments received in the prior submittal. Comments are expected to be refinements of prior work/ concepts and new or significant concept revisions are not expected or included in this scope of work.
An internal QA/QC review will be completed for the submittal and these records will be made available. Following the incorporation of applicable revisions and final design edits the bid documents will be stamped draft 90% and presented.
TASK 20.7 - 90% AESTHETIC FEATURE PLANS
The aesthetic features plans that were prepared during the 65% plan tasks will be updated based on comments received from the City and Caltrans. A review of the aesthetics plans will be completed as part of this phase to assess the constructability of the aesthetic features.
TASK 20.8 - DRAFT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Consor will prepare edited Technical Special Provisions utilizing the 90% project plans. The special provisions will be prepared in accordance with the most current version of the Caltrans Standard Specifications..
TASK 20.9 - 90% ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE AND JUSTIFICATION MEMORANDUM Two independent sets of quantity calculations will be prepared by individuals experienced in this work. The quantity calculations will be organized and detailed for use by field inspectors during construction. Standard Caltrans summary sheets will be used for quantity calculations, aiding in facilitating the review process and use by the construction personnel.
Bridge quantity estimators must agree within tolerances prescribed in Chapter 11 of the Caltrans Bridge Design Aids Manual. Any deviations will be resolved and the Marginal Estimate sheet will be prepared. Unit prices will be applied to each contract item resulting in the Engineer’s Estimate of Probable Construction Cost (Estimate). Prices used will be based on the latest available data from the City and Caltrans, reflecting the location of the project and the quantity of each item.
The estimate will be segregated into two categories: roadway and bridge. Non-participating costs, if federal funds will be used, will also be segregated. Five percent of the total estimate will be added for contingencies, per current Caltrans guidelines, and an additional City contingency will be added to effectively administer the project.
Consor will prepare a brief memorandum describing fluctuations to the costs associated with the project between 65% and 90% submittals. We will document the process used for determining the quantity of items and include the back up information regarding the unit prices for each item. This information will be summarized in a Justification Memorandum and submitted with the 90% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Costs.
TASK 20.10 - FINAL BRIDGE HYDRAULICS, STORMWATER DATA, DRAINAGE REPORTS This task includes our team preparing responses and incorporating revisions, as appropriate, to the Bridge Design Hydraulics, Stormwater Data, and Drainage Reports. Our scope includes two rounds of comments from the City and Caltrans.
TASK 20.11 - FINAL GEOTECHNICAL REPORT (GDR), FOUNDATION REPORT (FR) AND LOG OF TEST BORINGS Task 20.11.1 Final Geotechnical Design Report (GDR)
The final Geotechnical Design Report (GDR) incorporating review comments, as appropriate from the City , and Caltrans. It is not anticipated that the final report would incorporate evaluating additional alternatives, information or recommendations for improvements that are not described in this proposal. Up to two rounds of review are anticipated for the deliverable.
Task 20.11.2 Final Foundation Report (FR) for Earth Retaining Structures The final Foundation Report incorporating review comments, as appropriate from the City, and Caltrans for the ERS on the project. It is not anticipated that the final report would incorporate evaluating additional alternatives, information or
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 42 of 50 Detailed Scope
recommendations for improvements that are not described in this proposal. Up to two rounds of review are anticipated for the deliverable.
Task 20.11.3 Final Foundation Report (FR) for US 101 Overcrossing at Prado Road The final Foundation Report for the US 101 overcrossing structure at Prado Road incorporating review comments, as appropriate from the City, and Caltrans. It is not anticipated that the final report would incorporate evaluating additional alternatives, information or recommendations for improvements that are not described in this proposal. Up to two rounds of review are anticipated for the deliverable.
Task 20.11.4 Log of Test Borings (LOTB)
Yeh will prepare and submit a Log of Test Borings (LOTB) sheets including layout sheet(s) of the borings (using the project stationing and plans provided by the client) and boring profile sheets in accordance with Caltrans guidelines. Draft and final versions of the project LOTB’s will be submitted. The plan can be presented on the City’s project border if requested. LOTBs for the earth retaining structures and overcrossing structure and ramps will be provided.
TASK 20.12 - LEED/ENVISION SUBMISSION PACKAGE
Based on the determination of the Feasibility Memorandum and Public Input from Phase I, the Consor team will prepare a submission package for either LEED or Envision or Greenroads for evaluation of the sustainability of the project. We will submit a draft copy of the package for the City to provide comments. Those comments will be incorporated as appropriate and a final submittal package will be provided to the City for submission. Each program has a cost to submit, and these costs are not included in this scope of work.
TASK 20.13 - SUSTAINABILITY MEMORANDUM
The Sustainability Memorandum that was prepared during Phase I will be updated to reflect the approved project and discuss material types, construction techniques, and traffic control that have been incorporated into the project to reduce GHG emissions and limit environmental impact. A draft final report will be submitted to the City for comment. Comments will be incorporated as appropriate and a final report will be submitted.
TASK 20.14 - RESPONSE TO 3RD PARTY REVIEW COMMENTS AND MEETINGS (3) The City will be contracting separately with a 3rd party to review the 90% submittal. Our team will meet virtually with the 3rd party reviewers and the City to review the submittal and subsequent comments. We envision the first meeting will be a walk-through of the prepared plans, technical special provisions, and estimate, including discussing special details, specifications or items. The second meeting will focus on a review of the comments provided and our team’s responses.
The third meeting will be prior to our final 90% submittal to discuss the 3rd party’s final comments and how our team will address those comments. At each submittal, our team will prepare a comment response form. The form will include the location of the comment, a summary of the comment, who is responsible for the response, and the response to the comment.
TASK 20.15 - RESPONSE TO CITY/CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS (2) A Draft 90% Submittal will be made to the City and Caltrans for their review. Our team has assumed we will receive consolidated comments. We will address these comments and submit a Draft Final 90% submittal, which will be reviewed.
Upon receiving the second set of consolidated comments, the team will address the applicable comments and submit a Final 90% submittal. At each submittal, our team will prepare a comment response form. The form will include the location of the comment, a summary of the comment, who is responsible for the response, and the response to the comment.
TASK 20.16 – CALTRANS SAFETY REVIEW
We will coordinate with Caltrans design oversight staff to schedule and conduct the Caltrans Safety Review. This task includes meeting coordination, attendance, presenting the project at the meeting, producing meeting notes and developing a response to comments.
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 43 of 50 Detailed Scope
TASK 20.17 – CALTRANS 90% CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW
Consor will utilize our in-house construction management staff to perform a comprehensive constructability review on the 90% plans. We will coordinate with Caltrans design oversight staff to schedule and conduct the Caltrans 90% Constructability Review. This task includes meeting coordination, attendance, presenting the project at the meeting, producing meeting notes and developing a response to comments.
TASK 20.18 – PREPARE WORKING DAY CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Consor will prepare a construction schedule to estimate the number of working days to be included in the construction contract. The schedule will be done using Microsoft Project, unless the City prefers another format. The schedule will also be provided to the Resident Engineer for their use during construction.
TASK 20.19 - 90% SUBMITTAL TO OSFP
Consor will assemble and submit the 90% PS&E (Initial PS&E) to Caltrans OSFP for review. Submittals and review duration is expected to be in accordance with the OSFP Information and Procedures Guide.
TASK 20.20 PEER REVIEW CALTRANS SIGN STRUCTURE PS&E PACKAGE Caltrans will be preparing a PS&E package for the construction of a new permanent changeable message sign near the Prado Road Interchange project. As part of this task, Consor will conduct a peer review of Caltrans 90% PS&E package for the improvements. We have anticipated two reviews of Caltrans’ package.
TASK 20 DELIVERABLES
> Half Size (11x17) 90% Plans
> 90% Technical Special Provisions
> Design and Independent Check Calculations
> 90% Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Construction Cost and Justification Memorandum > Final Bridge Design Hydraulics Report (PDF)
> Final Stormwater Data Report (PDF)
> Final Drainage Report (PDF)
> Final Geotechnical Design Report (GDR)
> Final Foundation Report (FR) for Earth Retaining Structures > Final Foundation Report (FR) for US 101 Overcrossing at Prado Road > Draft and Final LEED/Envision submittal package (PDF) > Draft final and Final Sustainability Memorandum (PDF) > Attendance at three (3) virtual meetings with City 3rd Party Review consultant > Response to Comment Forms – 3rd Party Review
> Response to Comment Forms – City and Caltrans Review
> Working Day Construction Schedule
> Quantity Calculations and Independent Quantity Calculations > Quantity Summary Sheets
> QA/QC Documentation including Independent Design Check > Caltrans Safety Review Documentation
> Caltrans Constructability Review Documentation
> Draft and Final 90% Submittal to OSFP
> Two reviews of Caltrans 90% Sign PS&E package
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 44 of 50 Detailed Scope
Task 21.0 - 100% PS&E Submittal
TASK 21.1 - 100% ROADWAY, SIGNALS/LIGHTING, DRAINAGE, STORMWATER TREATMENT, LANDSCAPE, WET
UTILITIES, AESTHETIC DETAILS & STRUCTURE PLANS
The 90% plans will be revised based on comments received from the 90% submittal and reviewed for compatibility between portions of work and design disciplines, including a Road Plan Review as described in the Caltrans Memo to Designers 2-25. YEH will also review plans, specifications and provide general consultation within the proposed level of effort to check whether the recommendations of the geotechnical report were incorporated into the design and construction documents, and to assist with preparation/verification of the geotechnical aspects of the specifications.
Consor will perform a QA/QC review prior to the submittals listed above being transmitted to the City, and Caltrans. The review of the Draft PS&E will be performed by a senior level engineer for uniformity, compatibility, and constructability.
Separate QA/QC reviews will be done for the on the entire PS&E package. Consor will incorporate comments and submit 100% plans to the City and Caltrans.
TASK 21.2 - DRAFT FINAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
Consor will update the 90% Technical Special Provisions as necessary based on comments received and changes made for the 100% project plans. It is assumed the City will perform a final review on Boilerplate language and provide any updated language that needs to be incorporated.
TASK 21.3 - ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE AND JUSTIFICATION MEMORANDUM Consor will update the 90% construction Cost Estimate as necessary based on comments received and changes made for the 100% project plans. We do not anticipate there to be appreciable changes in the item costs at the 100% submittal. However, if due to delays in the project or unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of Consor, we will update the Justification Memorandum to provide reasons for the cost revisions.
TASK 21.4 – RESIDENT ENGINEER FILE
Consor will prepare the resident engineer (RE) file according to Chapter 15 of the Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual (PDPM). Consor will also utilize PDPM Appendix GG to ensure all items are included in the RE file as appropriate for the project. The RE file will include any pertinent project data required to administer the construction contract. The information will be compiled in two separate binders, one for the City and one to be passed onto the resident engineer in the field administering the construction contract.
TASK 21.5 - RESPONSE TO CITY/CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS (2) A Draft 100% Submittal will be made to the City and Caltrans for their review. Our team has assumed we will receive consolidated comments. We will address these comments and submit a Draft Final 100% submittal, which will be reviewed.
Upon receiving the second set of consolidated comments, the team will address the applicable comments and submit a Final 100% submittal. At each submittal, our team will prepare a comment response form. The form will include the location of the comment, a summary of the comment, who is responsible for the response, and the response to the comment.
TASK 21 DELIVERABLES
> Response to Comments Forms – City and Caltrans review > 11”x17” project plans (PDF)
> Draft special provisions (PDF)
> Engineer’s estimate and (PDF)
> Cross-sections at 50-foot intervals
> QA/QC Documentation
> Roadway earthwork calculations
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 45 of 50 Detailed Scope
> Resident Engineer File (PDF)
Task 22.0 - Final PS&E Package
TASK 22.1 - STAMPED AND SIGNED PROJECT PLANS
The100% plans will be revised based on comments received from the 100% submittal. Each plan sheet will be electronically stamped and signed by the Engineer/Architect in Responsible Charge of the elements contained on the specific sheet.
TASK 22.2 - STAMPED AND SIGNED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS The technical special provisions will be electronically stamped and signed by the Engineer/Architect in responsible charge for the development of the various specifications section. Stamped and signed specifications will be submitted to the City and Caltrans.
TASK 22.3 - ENGINEER’S ESTIMATE AND JUSTIFICATION MEMO
Consor will update the 100% construction Cost Estimate as necessary based on comments received and changes made for the 100% project plans. We do not anticipate there to be appreciable changes in the item costs at the Final submittal. However, if due to delays in the project or unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of Consor, we will update the Justification Memorandum to provide reasons for the cost revisions.
TASK 22.4 - RESPONSE TO CITY/CALTRANS REVIEW COMMENTS (1) A Draft Final Submittal will be made to the City and Caltrans for their review. Our team has assumed we will receive one set of consolidated comments. We will address these comments and submit a Final Stamped and Signed PS&E submittal. At each submittal, our team will prepare a comment response form. The form will include the location of the comment, a summary of the comment, who is responsible for the response, and the response to the comment.
TASK 22 DELIVERABLES
> Response to Comments Form – City and Caltrans review
> Stamped and Signed project plans (PDF)
> Stamped and Signed special provisions (PDF and MS Word) > Engineer’s Estimate and Justification Memorandum (PDF) Task 23.0 - Advisory Body Assistance - Phase II As the design progresses it is important to check in with City advisory bodies to inform them of the progress and provide them with the opportunity to provide input. During this Task, the Consor team will attend meetings, provide preparation sessions with staff, provide technical content for staff reports, and support City staff. Our scope assumes that the team will attend four (4) Advisory Body meetings. The renderings, conceptual exhibits, and technical content will be developed in various other Tasks in Phase II.
TASK 23.1 - ATTEND FOUR (4) MEETINGS IN PERSON
The Consor Project Manager, Deputy Project Manager, Bridge Project Engineer will be in attendance at four Advisory Body meetings throughout Phase II. The Advisory Bodies could be Planning Commission (PC), Architectural Review Committee (ARC), Chamber of Commerce, Downtown SLO, or the City Council.
TASK 23.2 - LEAD PREP MEETINGS WITH STAFF (8)
Team preparation is important for presentations at committee meetings. The Consor team will lead preparation meetings with City and Caltrans staff prior to committee or council meetings. These meetings will be virtual. We will attend two preparation meetings for each of the four (4) meetings. The meetings will focus on walking through the presentation to be made and discuss questions and issues that could be raised and our team’s responses.
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 46 of 50 Detailed Scope
TASK 23.3 - PREPARE TECHNICAL CONTENT FOR STAFF REPORTS (4) The Consor team will provide technical content for the City led staff reports for the Advisory Body meetings. The technical content will focus on project schedule, project costs, design decisions, aesthetic features, project layout, planting palettes, landscape and hardscape elements, bike and pedestrian features. Our team will provide renderings and plans prepared in previous tasks.
TASK 23.4 - COMMENT RESPONSE TO EACH MEETING (4)
Our goal in attending the Advisory Body meetings will be to answer questions from the committee members. However, there could be some comments or questions that cannot be effectively answered without additional analysis. Our team will document comments, questions and requests made during the meetings. We will prepare a memorandum documenting the comments and our team’s responses to those comments. In the memorandum, our team will identify requests that can be incorporated within the scope and fee and those elements that will necessitate a scope and fee revision.
TASK 23 DELIVERABLES
> Attendance at four (4) Advisory Body Meetings (in person) > Preparation and Attendance at a total of eight (8) preparation meetings for Advisory Body meetings (virtual) > Technical Content for four (4) staff reports (Word)
> Preparation of four (4) comment response memorandums (PDF) Task 24.0 - Public Outreach - Phase II
At the beginning of Phase II, Verdin and the Consor team will review the Draft Communications Plan (Phase II) and update to align with the goals of the City for communications for Phase II.
TASK 24.1 - PROJECT BRIEF AND FACT SHEET
The project Fact Sheet and FAQs that were developed in Phase I will be updated to reflect the input and direction of the Prado Interchange project as it moves forward.
TASK 24.2 - PUBLIC MEETING
A public meeting will be held during the development of the 90% PS&E package. The meeting will focus on updating the public on the project timeline, including when construction activities are likely to start, the impacts to traffic during construction, and the final design elements.
The public meeting will be attended by the Project Manager, Deputy Project Manager, Bridge Project Engineer, Utility Coordinator, Landscape Architect, Bridge Architect and Verdin Marketing staff.
As part of this task, the team will complete the following:
> Announcement, coordination and facilitation of one public meeting to present an update to the public. This effort includes:
• One press release and media outreach to get coverage before and after public meeting • Utilizing the City’s email program, send a branded email to residents and businesses • Updated signage, comment cards, updates to fact sheet/ FAQs. Printing not included. • Presentation and display coordination for the meeting • Coordination and facilitation of public meeting to present an update on the project. Our team recommends that the public meeting be held at the City Corp Yard on Prado Rd.
After the Public Meeting, Verdin and the design team will follow up with a meeting report with a summary of public engagement and comments/questions, the creation of a database for future outreach, and suggestions for project
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 47 of 50 Detailed Scope
refinements based on public input.
As an option, the team can videotape the public meeting for posting on the City’s Prado Interchange website to ensure information and ability to comment is inclusive of all audiences.
TASK 24.3 - LOCAL RESIDENT OUTREACH - MASS MAILERS (2)
Our team envisions that one mailer to all residents and businesses within the same area as Phase I public meeting, plus any additional addresses gathered from public comment cards, website inquiries, etc. Our scope assumes the City will print and mail the mailer.
A second mass mailer could either be specific to businesses in the area with a business focused Fact Sheet. Alternatively, the second mass mailer could be a recap and a link to view meeting (if the City authorizes the videotaping of the meeting).
The mailer would be sent to the same audience that received the public meeting announcement. Our scope assumes the City would print and mail the mailer.
TASK 24.4 - PRESS RELEASES (8)
One press release would be prepared to get coverage for the Public Meeting to provide an project update. Seven additional press releases are included to coincide with planned events, and to communicate project milestones or unplanned eventualities.
TASK 24.5 - MEDIA MANAGEMENT
Our team recommends providing a continuation of outreach to the media to inform them of the project timeline, scope and plans to ensure channels of communication remain open throughout the final design phase.
Verdin will update the talking points developed for key staff as part of Phase I.
It is recommended that the media be updated regularly; Verdin is also available to develop additional press releases and media relations for unplanned eventualities where media and public information is needed. Depending on the amount and level of effort additional scope may be required.
TASK 24.6 - CITY OF SLO WEBPAGE QUARTERLY UPDATES
As the plans are being developed in Phase II, there may not be enough content to warrant monthly updates to the City of SLO Prado Interchange webpage. Our team is recommending that the website is updated quarterly during Phase II.
TASK 24.7 - PROJECT BOARDS FOR OUTREACH MEETINGS (8 EVENTS, 4 BOARDS) The Consor team will provide project boards showing renderings of the final project improvements, including aesthetic treatments, landscaping (planting palettes), and hardscape options. The boards can also include project timelines, extents of construction, traffic patterns during construction and utility relocations. It is anticipated that the aesthetic content for these boards or other media will be similar to those created as part of Task 18.0. These boards/graphics/renderings will be prepared to support the public meeting and seven other events like Farmer’s Market, groundbreaking, Advisory Body meetings or placement at City offices.
Our scope includes the development, printing and mounting of four boards for seven separate events. It also assumes that at least two of the boards will be reused at the seven events for a total of sixteen boards.
TASK 24 DELIVERABLES
> Final Communications Plan (Phase II)
> Updated Prado Interchange Illustration, Fact Sheet, FAQs > Talking points for Key Staff
> Attendance at Public Meeting (Consor and Verdin)
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 48 of 50 Detailed Scope
> Public Meeting Report (PDF), including comment matrix > Two (2) mass mailers (PDF)- City to print and mail
> Eight press releases
> Twelve (12) City of SLO Prado Road Interchange Project webpage- Quarterly > Sixteen (16) project information boards/graphics/renderings Task 25.0 - Phase II Finalization
TASK 25.1 - SCOPING NARRATIVE - DESIGN CRITERIA/ DESIGN DECISION DOCUMENT At the conclusion of Phase II, the team will update the Scoping Narrative prepared at the end of Phase I. The document will summarize the design criteria for the project, a list of design exceptions, not already identified previously, findings and decisions incorporated in the final PS&E package, Geotechnical recommendations, Stormwater and Drainage design decisions, wet utility relocations, recap of Public Meeting and Advisory Body comments. The RE Pending file developed in Phase II will be an attachment to the Scoping Narrative document. This document will serve as the basis for the Scope of Work for Phase III.
TASK 25.2 - PHASE III SCOPE, SCHEDULE, FEE
Upon completion of the Scoping Narrative Memorandum, the Consor team with the City and Caltrans input, will review the Scope, Schedule and Fee for Phase III. We will work with the team to revise to our original scope, including deliverables and provide it to the City for their review and approval. Once the revised scope has been approved, the fee will be modified to match the approved scope of work.
TASK 25 DELIVERABLES
> Phase II Scoping Narrative Memorandum (PDF)
> Draft and Final Scope of Work and Fee (Phase III)
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 49 of 50 Detailed Scope
PHASE III - BID ADVERTISEMENT AND AWARD PHASE ADMINISTRATION The following scope for Phase III is based on Consor’s estimate for a typical level of effort for a project of this size and complexity. It is assumed that the City will be responsible for the advertisement and award of the construction contract. At the conclusion of Phase II, the scope for Phase III will be updated accordingly.
Task 26.0 - Advertising Preparation
The City will be responsible for the advertisement and award of the construction contract for the Prado Road Interchange. The Consor team will provide the City with a list of potential contractors that have the experience and capability to perform a similar type of work as the Prado Road Interchange project.
During Phase II, the Consor team will deliver an RE pending file, Quantity Calculations (both sets), roadway design cross sections. In addition to these items, we will provide the City with bridge deck four scales as necessary for the completion of the bridge deck grades.
Survey notes and monumentation data will be provided. The data will be sufficient for a licensed surveyor to locate monuments to recreate the rights-of-way.
TASK 26 DELIVERABLES
> Bridge Deck 4-Scales (PDF)
> Survey notes and monumentation data
Task 27.0 - Bid and Award Phase Assistance
TASK 27.1 - REVIEW AND RESPOND TO RFI’S DURING BIDDING
During bidding Consor has assumed up to ten (10) Request for Information (RFI) and one (5) Addendum may be required. If additional RFI’s or addendums are needed the scope and fee will need to be revisited. Consor will prepare responses within 5 business days.
Due to the indeterminate nature of this work, we has budgeted a total of 120 hours for this task.
TASK 27.2 - ANALYSIS OF BIDS, BID PROTEST SUPPORT, AND AWARD SUPPORT Consor will review the received bids. We will consolidate the bids into one spreadsheet to easily compare the bids side by side with the Engineer’s Estimate. We will review the bids for mathematical errors and unusual unit prices. Our review will focus on the bid items and costs. It is assumed that City Legal Staff will review the validity of bonds, DBE good faith efforts, and other associated bid forms.
If there is a bid protest, Consor will review the protest and provide our recommendation on the validity of the protest.
Our review will focus on the elements of the protest that are technical in nature and will not focus on the quality of the lowest responsible bidder’s submittal package (i.e. DBE good faith effort).
The Consor project manager and deputy project manager will attend one (1) City Council meeting for the award of the construction contract. We will prepare the technical portion of the presentation as it relates to the project’s construction.
For example, we will focus on items such as traffic control and handling, duration of construction, and anticipated impacts of the construction on the community. The recommendation for award and funding for the construction will be addressed by City staff. We will prepare meeting notes summarizing the questions, comments and action taken by City Council.
TASK 27.3 - PRECONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Given the size of the Prado Road Interchange project, it is assumed that the City will be looking for a consultant that specializes in Construction Management (CM). Consor will be available to review and provide comments on the City prepared Request for Proposal for CM services, review proposals received and participate in interviews as requested by the
US 101/Prado Road Interchange • City of San Luis Obispo • October 2024 • 50 of 50 Detailed Scope
City.
The Consor deputy project manager, bridge project engineer, roadway project engineer, wet utility task lead, and utility task lead, will attend the Pre-construction meeting in person. Other team members can be available virtually as necessary. This meeting will be led by the City’s CM consultant. We will be available to answer technical questions as they relate to the project. Consor staff will participate in four (4) preparatory meetings virtually before the Pre-construction meeting. During the preparatory meetings, we will provide input to the CM consultant on critical items during construction, including utility relocation.
TASK 27 DELIVERABLES:
> Response to ten (10) Requests for Information
> Preparation of five (5) Addenda
> Bid comparison spreadsheet and assessment
> Assistance with Bid Protect, if required
> Attendance and meeting notes at one (1) City Council Meeting > Review of City prepared RFP for CM services
> Review of CM consultant proposals and participation in CM interviews > Attendance at four (4) Pre-construction preparation meetings (virtual) > Attendance at Pre-construction meeting with CM consultant and contractor
Cost Pr
Project Number: Project Number
Task No. TASKS Principal In Charge
Project Manager
Deputy PM
Principal Engineer
Bridge Project Engineer
Professional Engineer
Professional Engineer
Principal Engineer
Senior Engineer
Professional Engineer
Engineering Designer
Student Intern
Senior CAD Designer
CAD Technician
Project Accountant
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
CAD Technician
Project Coordinator
Cost Estimator
MLR RBL DBM GRY SAM AMH BCH MAS SeEn PrEn EnDe StIn CADm CADt AdAs EK JT LS XX KM RB PSK ER BG No. Initial Hourly Rate $116.66 $125.00 $88.03 $96.32 $90.58 $53.33 $59.51 $88.58 $87.02 $61.82 $45.28 $21.85 $57.00 $41.50 $40.00 $82.96 $92.79 $86.54 $42.07 $38.94 $57.48 $43.58 $50.48 $85.87 Phase I Value Analysis, Survey, Hydraulic Study and Geotechnical Investigation
1.0 Project Management and Meetings
(Phase I)
1.1 Project Management 8 60 16 24 120
1.2 Kick off Meeting 8 8 12 12 12 8 4
1.3 Client Focus Meetings 24 24 24 24 24 4
1.4 PDT/Coordination Meetings (Caltrans) 24 24 24 24 24 4
1.5 Project Schedule Updates 6 12
1.6 Public Meeting 8 8 16 8 4
1.7 QA/QC 60 16 16 16
1.8 Encroachment Permits - Caltrans and City 8 24
2.0 Grant Assistance
2.1 Applicable Grant Opportunity Memo 12
2.2 Grant Application Assistance 24
3.0 Project Vision and Handoff
3.1 Previous Work Inventory 4 4 8 24
3.2 Handoff Meetings 4 6 6 6 12
3.3 Handoff Memorandum 12 12 16 16
4.0 Surveying/Topographic Mapping
4.1 Field work/ Topographic data collection 4 4 16 24 16
4.2 Right-of-Way, Boundary, and Easement Surveys 4 4 4 8
4.3 Road Alignments 4 4 4 24
5.0 Design Technical Reports
5.1 Geotechnical Design and Materials Report 4 12 8 8
5.2 Structures Preliminary Geotechnical Reports (SPGR)
5.2.1 Draft SPGR - Earth Retaining Structures 2 12 24
5.2.2 Draft SPGR - Bridges 2 12 32
5.3 Update Location Hydraulic Study 4 8 16
5.4 Drainage Impact Study Report 4 4 8 8 8
5.5 Prelimininary Floodplain and Bridge Design Hydraulic Study 4 12 16
5.6 Preliminary Stormwater Data Report 4 4 4 16
5.7 Water Quality Assessment Report 4 4 8
5.8 Right Of Way Needs Determination 6 4 12 16 16 16
5.9 Right Of Way Estimating 6 4 8 8
5.10 Environmental Permit and Monitoring Program 6 4 8 12
6.0 Value Analysis
6.1 Draft Value Analysis Report 8 24 24 24 60 24 10 12 48 16
6.1.1 Design Charrettes (City and Caltrans) 12 16 24 24 32 8
6.1.2 Conceptual Roll Map/Bridge Advance Plans 16 40 40 40 120 120 240
6.1.3 Renderings of Preferred Alternative 4 12 12 12 40 60 100 200
6.1.4 Cost Estimates 6 12 24 48 60 240 4 24
6.2 Final Value Analysis Report 6 16 8 16 40 24 10 10 32 16
6.3 Validation of Traffic Analysis (optional)
6.3.1 Update Traffic Counts 4 6 4
6.3.2 20-Year Travel Forecast Model for Preferred Alternative 8 6 8
6.3.3 Future Project Compatibility 8 8 8
6.4 LEED/Envision Memorandum of Feasibility 4 16 16 120
6.5 Sustainability Memorandum 8 8
7.0 Schematic Aesthetic Development
7.1 Develop Renderings (3 Concepts): Bridge, Roadway, Signage, Landscape 8 8 16 16 40 64 40 Project Name: Prado Road Interchange
2024-10-08 Consor Fee By Phase Project 1 Hrs 10/8/2024
Cost Pr
Project Number: Project Number
Task No. TASKS Principal In Charge
Project Manager
Deputy PM
Principal Engineer
Bridge Project Engineer
Professional Engineer
Professional Engineer
Principal Engineer
Senior Engineer
Professional Engineer
Engineering Designer
Student Intern
Senior CAD Designer
CAD Technician
Project Accountant
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
CAD Technician
Project Coordinator
Cost Estimator
MLR RBL DBM GRY SAM AMH BCH MAS SeEn PrEn EnDe StIn CADm CADt AdAs EK JT LS XX KM RB PSK ER BG No. Initial Hourly Rate $116.66 $125.00 $88.03 $96.32 $90.58 $53.33 $59.51 $88.58 $87.02 $61.82 $45.28 $21.85 $57.00 $41.50 $40.00 $82.96 $92.79 $86.54 $42.07 $38.94 $57.48 $43.58 $50.48 $85.87 Project Name: Prado Road Interchange
7.2 Meeting - City and Caltrans 4 4 4 4 4
7.3 Draft Aesthetic Report 4 8 4 4 4
8.0 Utility Coordination - Phase I
8.1 "A" Letters 8 12 48 60
8.2 Meetings with affected utilities (2 mtgs per utility, incl City wet utilities. 1 in person, 1 virtual) 40 60 60 24 6
8.3 Pothole Exhibits (2) 4 8 40 60
8.4 Utility Coordination - Dry Utilities to underground 60
9.0 Bridge Type Selection Report
9.1 Pre-Type Selection Submittal to OSFP 4 24 40 24 40
9.2 Type Selection Report 4 80 120 100 60 400
9.3 Draft Type Selection Report Submittal to City 4 12 16 16
9.4 Type Selection Report Submittal to Caltrans & Type Selection Meeting 4 4 60 80 80 40 24
10.0 Public Outreach - Phase I
10.1 Public Meeting - VA recommendations
10.2 Meeting minutes and Comment Matrix 4 4 10.3
Local Residence Outreach - Mass Mailers (2) 4 4
10.4 Press Releases (3) 4 6 10.5 Media Management 4 6 8
10.6 City of SLO Webpage Monthly Updates 4 8 4 8 12 8 10.7 Project Boards for Outreach Meetings (3 events, 4 boards ea) 8 24 32 64 80 40
11.0 Advisory Body Assistance
11.1 Attend four (4) meetings in person 24 24 56 32 11.2 Lead prep meetings with staff (8) 16 16 8 8 8 11.3 Prepare technical content for Staff Reports (4) 4 16 8 16 8
11.4 Comment response to each meeting (4) 4 8 8 8 8 12.0 50% Submittal 12.1 50% Roadway, Signal, & Lighting Plans 40 80 8 240 360 500 112.2 50% Structure Plans 60 360 100 40 1084 1
12.3 50% Drainage and Stormwater Plans 24 8 80 12.4 50% Landscape Plans 2 4
12.5 50% Wet Utility Plans 4 8 8 20 48 24 24 24 12.6 Engineer's Estimate 4 8 12 48 60 112 72 2 8 8
12.7 Plan Review meetings (3) 6 6 6 6 4 4 12.8 Response to Comments (2) 24 24 32 60 72 24 12 24 16 16 13.0 Phase I Finalization
13.1 Scoping Document - Final 6 24 12 8 4 13.2 Phase II Scope, Schedule, Fee 12 24 16 8 4 Phase II - PS&E Development
14.0 Project Management and Meetings -
Phase II
14.1 Project Management 8 60 36 120
14.2 Client Focus Meetings 24 24 24 24 24 4
14.3 PDT/Coordination Meetings (Caltrans) (12) 12 24 24 24 24 4
14.4 Project Schedule Updates 8 28 8 8 14.5 City Council Meeting 8 8 14 8
14.6 QA/QC 24 8 16 120 16 16 16 16 16 15.0 Grant Assistance (Phase II)
15.1 Yearly Grant Opportunity/Application Memo 12
15.2 Grant Application Assistance 24 16.0 Utility Coordination 2024-10-08 Consor Fee By Phase Project 1 Hrs 10/8/2024
Cost Pr
Project Number: Project Number
Task No. TASKS Principal In Charge
Project Manager
Deputy PM
Principal Engineer
Bridge Project Engineer
Professional Engineer
Professional Engineer
Principal Engineer
Senior Engineer
Professional Engineer
Engineering Designer
Student Intern
Senior CAD Designer
CAD Technician
Project Accountant
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
CAD Technician
Project Coordinator
Cost Estimator
MLR RBL DBM GRY SAM AMH BCH MAS SeEn PrEn EnDe StIn CADm CADt AdAs EK JT LS XX KM RB PSK ER BG No. Initial Hourly Rate $116.66 $125.00 $88.03 $96.32 $90.58 $53.33 $59.51 $88.58 $87.02 $61.82 $45.28 $21.85 $57.00 $41.50 $40.00 $82.96 $92.79 $86.54 $42.07 $38.94 $57.48 $43.58 $50.48 $85.87 Project Name: Prado Road Interchange
16.1 Utility Coordination - Dry Utilities to underground 60
16.2 Review Meetings (5 mtgs with each affected utility incl City utilities) 8 24 12 16 60 140 24 24
16.3 "B" Letters 8 24 80 16.4 Utility Agreement Preparation 4 12 40 120 16.5 "C" Letters 4 8 24 60 16.6 Utility Agreement Signatures 4 8 60 60 17.0 ROW Coordination
17.1 Final ROW needs map (incl underground utilities) 4 12 40 40 80
17.2 Survey Staking of Potential ROW takes
17.3 Property Owner Introduction Meetings (2 per owner) 16
17.4 Appraisals 4 16 16 17.5 Draft offer packages 4 8 17.6 Attend two (2) City Council closed
session meetings (Offers) 8
17.7 Property Owner Offer Meetings (2 per owner) 4
17.8 Attend two (2) City Council closed
session meetings (authorize payment) 8
17.9 ROW agreements and create escrow accounts 8
18.0 65% PS&E Package
18.1 65% Roadway Design & Plans 40 80 8 16 640 800 1200 2
18.2 65% Drainage and Stormwater Plans 16 40 80 80
18.3 65% Wet Utility Plans 16 24 16 24 40 20 24 60 18.4 65% Bridge & Retaining Wall Plans 8 24 240 480 240 240 40 800 218.5 65% Landscape Plans 6 12 18.6 Technical Specifications List 16 16 16 16 16 24 60 18.7 Engineer's Estimate 16 12 48 80 152 72 4 4 16 8 12
18.8 Draft Final Bridge Design Hydraulics Report 4 8 12 24
18.9 Draft Final Stormwater Data 4 6 8
18.10 Draft Final Drainage Report 4 8 12 12 12
18.11 Draft Final Foundation and Geotechnical Report 4 8 24 48 8
18.12 Soil and Groundwater Management Plan 6 8
18.13 Response to Comments (2) 8 24 24 40 40 80 80 8 16 42 20 8 30
18.14 Caltrans 65% Constructability Review 16 24 40 60 40 80
18.15 65% Submittal to OSFP 16 40 40 56
18.16 Regulatory Permitting 24 40
19.0 Final Aesthetic Development
19.1 Final Renderings of Aesthetic Treatments 8 16 16 16 24
19.2 City/Caltrans Review Meeting (1) 2 4 2 4 19.3
Advisory Body Presentation and
Renderings 8 16 4 8 120 160
19.4 Draft Final and Final Aesthetic Report 16 4 4 8 20.0 90% PS&E Submittal
20.1 Structures Independent Check 40 80 240 480 240 120 120.2 90% Roadway, Signal, & Lighting Plans (incl Rdwy Independent Check) 40 60 200 120 600 600 1
20.3 90% Drainage and Stormwater Plans 12 24 60 60 80 20.4 90% Wet Utility Plans 8 16 60 40 8 40
20.5 90% Bridge Plans 40 60 20 714 20.6 90% Landscape Plans 20.7 90% Aesthetic Feature Plans 8 24 20.8 Draft Technical Specifications 8 24 16 16 40 80 16 16 40
20.9 Engineer's Estimate and Justification Memo 4 24 24 48 60 60 96 80 4 4 8 8 12
20.10 Final Bridge Hydraulics, Stormwater, and Drainage Reports 4 8 8 8 8 2024-10-08 Consor Fee By Phase Project 1 Hrs 10/8/2024
Cost Pr
Project Number: Project Number
Task No. TASKS Principal In Charge
Project Manager
Deputy PM
Principal Engineer
Bridge Project Engineer
Professional Engineer
Professional Engineer
Principal Engineer
Senior Engineer
Professional Engineer
Engineering Designer
Student Intern
Senior CAD Designer
CAD Technician
Project Accountant
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Principal Engineer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
Engineering Designer
CAD Technician
Project Coordinator
Cost Estimator
MLR RBL DBM GRY SAM AMH BCH MAS SeEn PrEn EnDe StIn CADm CADt AdAs EK JT LS XX KM RB PSK ER BG No. Initial Hourly Rate $116.66 $125.00 $88.03 $96.32 $90.58 $53.33 $59.51 $88.58 $87.02 $61.82 $45.28 $21.85 $57.00 $41.50 $40.00 $82.96 $92.79 $86.54 $42.07 $38.94 $57.48 $43.58 $50.48 $85.87 Project Name: Prado Road Interchange
20.11 Final Geotechnical Report, Foundation Report, and LOTB 4 8 8 8 8
20.12 LEED/Envision Submission Package 4 12 120
20.13 Sustainability Memorandum 4 6
20.14 Response to 3rd Party Review Comments and Meetings (3) 6 24 24 24 24 8 16 8
20.15 Response to City/ Caltrans Review Comments (2) 4 16 16 16 16 4 12 16 16
20.16 Caltrans Safety Review 12 16
20.17 Caltrans 90% Constructability Review 4 16 24 40 40 16
20.18 Prepare Working Day Schedule 8 32 24 24 24
20.19 Draft and Final 90% Submittal to OSFP 16 48 32
20.20 Peer Review Caltrans Sign Structure PS&E Package 24 40 16
21.0 100% PS&E Submittal
21.1 100% Plans 24 60 40 80 240 360 20 682 4 12 24 16 4 24 4 1
21.2 Draft Technical Specifications 4 16 8 8 24 40 8 16 30 21.3 Engineers Estimate & Justification Memorandum 4 16 16 40 40 40 4 8 8 12
21.4 Resident Engineer File 4 8 4 8 24 21.5
Response to City/Caltrans Review Comments (2) 4 8 8 16 16 4 4 8
22.0 Final PS&E Package
22.1 Stamped and Signed Project Plans 8 24 40 40 80 2 6 8 12
22.2 Stamped and Signed Technical Specifications 4 8 8 8 16 8 16 30
22.3 Engineer's Estimate and Justification Memo 4 8 8 24 2 2 8 8 12
22.4 Response to City/Caltrans Review Comments (1) 4 8 8 16 16 2 6 8
23.0 Advisory Body Assistance - Phase II
23.1 Attend four (4) meetings in person 32 32 56 32 23.2 Lead prep meetings with staff (8) 16 24 8 8 16 23.3 Prepare technical content for Staff Reports (4) 8 24 8 8 16
23.4 Comment response to each meeting (4) 8 8 8 8 8 24.0 Public Outreach - Phase II 24.1 Project Brief and Fact Sheet 6 4 24.2 Public Meeting 8 8 14 8 24.3 Local Residence Outreach - Mass Mailers (2) 4
24.4 Press Releases (8) 16 24.5 Media Management 8
24.6 City of SLO Webpage Monthly Updates 16 24.7
Project Boards for Outreach Meetings (8 events, 4 boards) 8 24 40 80 80
25.0 Phase II Finalization
25.1 Scoping Narrative - Design Criteria/Design Decision Document 8 40 16 24
25.2 Phase III Scope, Schedule, Fee 16 24 16 24
Phase III - Bid Advertisement and Award Administration
26.0 Advertising Preparation 4 8 8 16 16 16
27.0 Bid and Award Assistance
27.1 Review and Respond to RFIs during Bidding 4 16 16 16 16 16 80
27.2 Analysis of Bids, Bid Protest Support
and Award Support 4 16 16 16 8 16
27.3 Preconstruction Support 8 24 16 8
Subtotal - Hours 40 960 2018 220 1874 2872 3974 728 360 916 4584 484 420 7332 52 260 174 326 632 220 68 206 240 60 Anticipated Salary Increases
Other Direct Costs Total Cost $4,666 $120,000 $177,645 $21,190 $169,747 $153,164 $236,493 $64,486 $31,327 $56,627 $207,564 $10,575 $23,940 $304,278 $2,080 $21,570 $16,145 $28,212 $26,588 $8,567 $3,909 $8,977 $12,115 $5,152 $1 2024-10-08 Consor Fee By Phase Project 1 Hrs 10/8/2024
Date: 10/8/2024
Consor North America, Inc.
Direct Labor: $600,159.12
Estimated Salary Increases for Multi-Year Project $33,221.78 Subtotal $633,380.90
Overhead (1.710): $1,083,271.36
A. Labor Subtotal $1,716,652.26
Subconsultant Costs:
AECOM $126,100.00
Apexx $38,250.00
Bennet $50,285.00
DKS $88,460.00
HDR $356,385.00
Hamner Jewell Associates $0.00
Rincon $15,194.00
Sunrise Transportation $52,600.00
Verdin Marketing $45,763.00
Wallace Group $290,385.00
Yeh and Associates $46,590.00
B. Subconsultant Subtotal $1,110,012.00
Other Direct Costs:
Travel (@ active IRS mileage rate) 7000 miles @ $0.670 $4,690.00 Pier Diem/ Hotel 50 days @ $250.000 $12,500.00
Equipment Rental and Supplies $0.000 $0.00
Permit Fees 0 @ $0.000 $0.00
Vendor Reproduction
Vellum 0 @ -$ $0.00
81/2 X 11 Reproduction 0 @ -$ $0.00
11 X 17 Reproduction 0 @ -$ $0.00
Mounting Boards for Presentations 0 @ -$ $0.00
Newsletters (Translation and printing) 0 @ -$ $0.00
Subtotal Vendor Reproduction $0.00
Title Report 0 @ -$ $0.00
Miscellaneous 0 $ - $0.00
C. Other Direct Cost Subtotal: $17,190.00
Labor Subtotal A. = $1,716,652.26
Fixed Fee (12.0%): $205,998.27
Subconsultant Subtotal B. = $1,110,012.00
Fixed Fee (0.0%): $0.00
Other Direct Cost Subtotal: C. = $17,190.00
Fixed Fee (0.0%): $0.00
TOTAL = $3,049,852.53
Note: Invoices will be based upon actual Consor hourly rates plus overhead at 171.03% plus prorated portion of fixed fee. Subconsultant and Direct Costs will be billed at actual cost.
The overhead rate (ICR) shall remain fixed for the contract duration or until both parties to modify the rate in writing.
Prado Road Interchange
Phase 1 Fee
CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Date: 10/8/2024
Consor North America, Inc.
Direct Labor: $1,091,633.66
Estimated Salary Increases for Multi-Year Project $99,665.34 Subtotal $1,191,299.00
Overhead (1.710): $2,037,478.69
A. Labor Subtotal $3,228,777.69
Subconsultant Costs:
AECOM $110,350.00
Apexx $63,250.00
Bennet $137,593.00
DKS $0.00
HDR $821,725.00
Hamner Jewell Associates $157,505.00
Rincon $88,512.00
Sunrise Transportation $24,900.00
Verdin Marketing $71,715.00
Wallace Group $156,280.00
Yeh and Associates $627,642.00
B. Subconsultant Subtotal $2,259,472.00
Other Direct Costs:
Travel (@ active IRS mileage rate) 10500 miles @ $0.670 $7,035.00 Pier Diem/ Hotel 75 days @ $250.000 $18,750.00
Equipment Rental and Supplies $0.000 $0.00
Permit Fees 0 @ $0.000 $0.00
Vendor Reproduction
Vellum 0 @ -$ $0.00
81/2 X 11 Reproduction 0 @ -$ $0.00
11 X 17 Reproduction 0 @ -$ $0.00
Mounting Boards for Presentations 0 @ -$ $0.00
Newsletters (Translation and printing) 0 @ -$ $0.00
Subtotal Vendor Reproduction $0.00
Title Report 0 @ -$ $0.00
Miscellaneous 0 $ - $0.00
C. Other Direct Cost Subtotal: $25,785.00
Labor Subtotal A. = $3,228,777.69
Fixed Fee (12.0%): $387,453.32
Subconsultant Subtotal B. = $2,259,472.00
Fixed Fee (0.0%): $0.00
Other Direct Cost Subtotal: C. = $25,785.00
Fixed Fee (0.0%): $0.00
TOTAL = $5,901,488.01
Note: Invoices will be based upon actual Consor hourly rates plus overhead at 171.03% plus prorated portion of fixed fee. Subconsultant and Direct Costs will be billed at actual cost.
The overhead rate (ICR) shall remain fixed for the contract duration or until both parties to modify the rate in writing.
Prado Road Interchange
Phase 2 Fee
CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Date: 10/8/2024
Consor North America, Inc.
Direct Labor: $23,225.12
Estimated Salary Increases for Multi-Year Project $0.00 Subtotal $23,225.12
Overhead (1.710): $39,721.92
A. Labor Subtotal $62,947.04
Subconsultant Costs:
AECOM $0.00
Apexx $0.00
Bennet $0.00
DKS $0.00
HDR $23,938.00
Hamner Jewell Associates $0.00
Rincon $0.00
Sunrise Transportation $0.00
Verdin Marketing $0.00
Wallace Group $0.00
Yeh and Associates $0.00
B. Subconsultant Subtotal $23,938.00
Other Direct Costs:
Travel (@ active IRS mileage rate) 0 miles @ $0.670 $0.00 Pier Diem/ Hotel 0 days @ $250.000 $0.00
Equipment Rental and Supplies $0.000 $0.00
Permit Fees 0 @ $0.000 $0.00
Vendor Reproduction
Vellum 0 @ -$ $0.00
81/2 X 11 Reproduction 0 @ -$ $0.00
11 X 17 Reproduction 0 @ -$ $0.00
Mounting Boards for Presentations 0 @ -$ $0.00
Newsletters (Translation and printing) 0 @ -$ $0.00
Subtotal Vendor Reproduction $0.00
Title Report 0 @ -$ $0.00
Miscellaneous 0 $ - $0.00
C. Other Direct Cost Subtotal: $0.00
Labor Subtotal A. = $62,947.04
Fixed Fee (12.0%): $7,553.65
Subconsultant Subtotal B. = $23,938.00
Fixed Fee (0.0%): $0.00
Other Direct Cost Subtotal: C. = $0.00
Fixed Fee (0.0%): $0.00
TOTAL = $94,438.69
Note: Invoices will be based upon actual Consor hourly rates plus overhead at 171.03% plus prorated portion of fixed fee. Subconsultant and Direct Costs will be billed at actual cost.
The overhead rate (ICR) shall remain fixed for the contract duration or until both parties to modify the rate in writing.
Prado Road Interchange
Phase 3 Fee
CONSOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS - EXISTING CONDITIONS
Disclaimer:
1. This map summarizes preliminary results of a planning-level traffic operations analysis conducted for the City by Central Coast Transportation Consulting for select intersections and roadway segments that are most likely to be affected by the Prado Interchange Project. LOS results reported for worst-case AM/PM peak hour period.
2. This analysis is not exhaustive and is intended for planning and discussion purposes only.
Additional evaluation is required to guide formal conclusions on potential traffic operations impacts and potential operational improvements that would be required to resolve projected impacts.
3. Existing conditions analysis is based on traffic volume data collected in 2022 and 2023.
4. Future (2045) Conditions analyses developed using the Citywide Travel Demand Forecasting Model, and represent buildout of land use and transportation plans envisioned in the City's 2035 General Plan, plus additional regional growth per SLOCOG's Regional Transportation Plan. 8,000 veh/day
16,000 veh/day
21,000 veh/day
24,000 veh/day 22,000 veh/day
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS - 2045 WITH PRADO INTERCHANGE
30,000 veh/day
21,000 veh/day 26,000 veh/day
Disclaimer:
1. This map summarizes preliminary results of a planning-level traffic operations analysis conducted for the City by Central Coast Transportation Consulting for select intersections and roadway segments that are most likely to be affected by the Prado Interchange Project. LOS results reported for worst-case AM/PM peak hour period.
2. This analysis is not exhaustive and is intended for planning and discussion purposes only.
Additional evaluation is required to guide formal conclusions on potential traffic operations impacts and potential operational improvements that would be required to resolve projected impacts.
3. Existing conditions analysis is based on traffic volume data collected in 2022 and 2023.
4. Future (2045) Conditions analyses developed using the Citywide Travel Demand Forecasting Model, and represent buildout of land use and transportation plans envisioned in the City's 2035 General Plan, plus additional regional growth per SLOCOG's Regional Transportation Plan.
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS - 2045 NO PRADO INTERCHANGE
12,000 veh/day
31,000 veh/day 37,000 veh/day
EB queues on Madonna
spill back from Higuera to
US 101 ramps without
Prado Interchange
Disclaimer:
1. This map summarizes preliminary results of a planning-level traffic operations analysis conducted for the City by Central Coast Transportation Consulting for select intersections and roadway segments that are most likely to be affected by the Prado Interchange Project. LOS results reported for worst-case AM/PM peak hour period.
2. This analysis is not exhaustive and is intended for planning and discussion purposes only.
Additional evaluation is required to guide formal conclusions on potential traffic operations impacts and potential operational improvements that would be required to resolve projected impacts.
3. Existing conditions analysis is based on traffic volume data collected in 2022 and 2023.
4. Future (2045) Conditions analyses developed using the Citywide Travel Demand Forecasting Model, and represent buildout of land use and transportation plans envisioned in the City's 2035 General Plan, plus additional regional growth per SLOCOG's Regional Transportation Plan.
SB queues on Higuera spill
back from Los Osos Valley
Rd past Tank Farm without
Prado Interchange
NB queues on Higuera spill back from
Tank Farm past Suburban Rd without
Prado Interchange NB/SB queues on Los
Osos Valley Rd to spill
back onto US 101
overcrossing in both
directions
WB queues on Madonna
spill back from US 101
ramps to Higuera St
without Prado Interchange Page 501 of 504
LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLDS AT INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION
CITY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION
ELEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
LOS D OR BETTER ISMINIMUM STANDARDFOR AUTOS OUTSIDEOF THE DOWNTOWN
0.8 4.4
--
--
--
0.1 --
0.1 --
--
0.0 -- --
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.6 --
--
--
--
0.4 --
--
--
--
--
2.1 --
--
--
--
--
--
7.9 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- --
--
--
--
--
10.6 --
--
3.2 --
-- --
0.0 --
--
0.1 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- --
0.3 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
1.2 --
--
--
--
--
7.0 0.0
--
--
--
3.0 --
--
1.2 --
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.5 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
0.0 -- --
--
0.0 --
--
--
----
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.2 --
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
3.4 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.6 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.1 --
9.4 --
--
0.0 ----
--
--
--
--
-- --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
0.0 --
--
0.0 0.1
0.0 0.6
0.0 --
--
0.2 --
2.2 --
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
9.7 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
3.6 --
8.4 --
--
--
0.1 --
0. --
0.0 --
6.5 --
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
0.2 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
0.5 0.6
--
--
--
--
-- --
--
--
--
--
--
-- --
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
0.0 -
-- --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
1.1 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
2.3 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
0.6 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
0.1 --
--
--
--
--
6.6 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.6 --
--
--
16.9 --
0.0 --
--
--
--
8.6 --
--
--
6. -
8 -
--
--
0.0 --
--
0.8 --
0.0 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
1.0 --
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.6 --
--
--
--
--
-- ----
--
--
1.2 1.2 0.1
--
--
0.3 3.2
--
--
--
1.1 4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
3.1 --
0.0 --
--
1.9 0.0
--
----
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.4 --
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
-
-- -
--
--
--
0.8 0.1
0.0 --
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- 0.0
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
0.0 --
--
--
--
0.2 -- --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.7 --
7.1 0.3
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
0.0 0.9
0.0 --
-- --
--
--
0.1 3.6
--
-- 0.5
--
-- --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
7.3 --
0.5 0.0
6.0 --
--
0.0 --
0.0 --
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
0.5 --
--
--
0.1 0.1
--
--
--
0.1 0.0
--
0.6 0.2
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
3.1 --
--
0.0 0.0
--
0.1 --
3.6 --
--
--
0.1 --
--
--
--
0. 0
1 .3
0.0 0.0
0.1 --
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.0 --
0.0 --
0.2 0.0
--
--
--
--
--
0.2 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
0.3 --
--
--
--
0.3 0.1 --
--
--
--
--
2.5 --
-- --
0.0 --
1.9 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
1.1 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
-- 0.8 0.0
--
1.4 --
4.4 0.0
5.5 0.0
--
--
0.0 --
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.0 0.1
0.0 --
--
0.1 0.1
--
20.3 0.0
--
--
--
--
0.1 --
0.2 --
--
--
--
--
4.4 --
0.1 3.4
0.0 --
--
0.6 0.3
--
--
--
7.0 --
--
6.8 --
2.2 0.5
--
0.6 --
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
0.3 0.5
--
--
--
--
0.0 1.9
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
--
0.6 --
--
0.2 --
--
0.0 -- 0.1
0.0 0.8
--
0.0 --
--
3.3 --
1.0 --
1.1 --
--
--
--
3.6 5.1
0.4 0.0
--
--
1.4 --
0.3 0.1
0.0 0.2
0.0 0.0
1.8 3.2
--
--
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.6
--
--
--
0.5 0.6
0.0 --
3.6 --
--
0.1 --
--
--
24.7 --
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0
--
--
0.8 --
--
--
--
0.0 0.2
7.1 0.9
0.0 0.1
--
--
0.3 --
--
--
0.0 0.0
--
0.6 0.2
--
--
1.4 6.5
0.0 0.0
2.2 --
--
--
--
0.0 0.6
0.0 0.4
0.0 0.
8.4 0.8
0.0 0.0
1.9 0.0
0.3 --
0.1 --
6.7 0.4
0.0 --
4.4 0.4
0.0 --
0.0 0.0
0.3 --
1.1 0.9
0.2 0.1
--
0.0 0.0
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.0 0
0.0 --
--
0.1 1.8
--
--
0.5 0.0
--
0.0 --
--
--
--
0.0 --
--
--
0.0 --
-
0.0 --
0.0 00
--
--
0.3 1.0
7.0 6.3
--
6.8 0.1
--
0.0 1.1
0.0 3
0.6 0.1
0.0 --
--
8.8 0.0
0.2 --
--
--
0.1 0.0
--
--
--
--
0.0 0.3
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
--
0.3 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2
0.4 0.0
0.3 0
3.6 --
1.1 0.0
0.6 --
0.0 0.0
--
0.0 --
3.6 0.1
0.0 0.1
0.0 0.1
0.1 --
0.0 0.0
--
0.0 0.0
--
0.6 --
0.1 --
0.0 --
0.0 --
0.3 1.1
0.6 0.0
0.0 1.1
0.2 0.0
--
0.0 --
0.8 0.0
LEGEND
0 .3 .6 .9
Miles
December 11, 2024
Direction of Change
Volume Decreases
Minimal Change
Volume Increases
Magnitude of Change
5000 2500 0
SHIFT IN TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION
2045 CONDITIONS WITHOUT PRADO INTERCHANGE
Average Daily Traffic Volume Disclaimer: 1. This map summarizes an estimate of relative traffic volume shift (average daily traffic volume) for 2045conditions with removal of the Prado Road Interchange. 2. Volumes represent planning-level forecasts developedusing the Citywide Travel Demand Forecasting Model. Model volumes should not be taken at face value, but areintended to provide a relative approximation of shifts intraffic with removal of the interchange.
Without Prado Interchange,traffic flows shift toalternative routes to accesseast/west sides of US 101,with notable increase involumes on Higuera northand south of Prado,Madonna Road east of US101, and Los Osos ValleyRoad