Agenda packet — Santa Ana City Council, February 15, 2022 (part 8 of 9)

Assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center and of the Sacred Land Files maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission. The records searches will determine if the proposed project area has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. If unpaved surfaces are present within the project area, and the entire project area has not been previously surveyed within the past 10 years, a Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in proposed project areas to locate any surface cultural materials that may be present.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards to determine significance prior to any ground-disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site-specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken.

These might include a Phase III data recovery program implemented by a qualified archaeologist and performed in accordance with the Office of Historical Preservation’s “Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR): Recommended Contents and Format” (OHP 1990) and “Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs” (OHP 1991).

Prior to any ground
disturbing activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 215 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2021 Page 15
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist and a Native American monitor approved by a California Native American Tribe identified by the Native American Heritage Commission as culturally affiliated with the project area shall monitor all ground-disturbing construction and preconstruction activities in areas of high sensitivity. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial on-site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. The Native American monitor shall be invited to participate in this training. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary’s Standards. This will include tribal consultation and coordination with the Native American monitor in the case of a prehistoric archaeological resource or tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe.

Prior to
construction
activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 216 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 16 ends

Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary’s Standards shall be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre-construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial on-site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on-call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant.

Prior to
construction
activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division

5.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
GEO-1 High Sensitivity. Projects involving ground disturbances in previously undisturbed areas mapped as having “high” paleontological sensitivity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor on a full-time basis. Monitoring shall include inspection of exposed sedimentary units during active excavations within sensitive geologic sediments. The monitor shall have authority to temporarily divert activity away from exposed fossils to evaluate the significance of the find and, if the fossils are determined to be significant, professionally and efficiently recover the fossil specimens and collect associated data. The paleontological monitor shall use field data forms to record pertinent location and geologic data, measure stratigraphic sections (if applicable), and collect appropriate sediment samples from any fossil localities..

During ground
disturbing activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 217 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2021 Page 17
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
GEO-2 Low-to-High Sensitivity. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for projects involving ground disturbance in previously undisturbed areas mapped with “low-to-high” paleontological sensitivity (see Figure 5.6-3), the project applicant shall consult with a geologist or paleontologist to confirm whether the grading would occur at depths that could encounter highly sensitive sediments for paleontological resources. If confirmed that underlying sediments may have high sensitivity, construction activity shall be monitored by a qualified paleontologist.

The paleontologist shall have the authority to halt construction during construction activity as outlined in Mitigation Measure GEO-3.

Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
GEO-3 All Projects. In the event of any fossil discovery, regardless of depth or geologic formation, construction work shall halt within a 50-foot radius of the find until its significance can be determined by a qualified paleontologist. Significant fossils shall be recovered, prepared to the point of curation, identified by qualified experts, listed in a database to facilitate analysis, and deposited in a designated paleontological curation facility in accordance with the standards of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). The most likely repository is the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. The repository shall be identified and a curatorial arrangement shall be signed prior to collection of the fossils.

During ground
disturbing activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division

5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
GHG-1 The City of Santa Ana shall update the Climate Action Plan (CAP) every five years to ensure the City is monitoring the plan’s progress toward achieving the City’s greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving the specified level. The update shall consider a trajectory consistent with the GHG emissions reduction goal established under Executive Order S-03-05 for year 2050 and the latest applicable statewide legislative GHG emission reduction that may be in effect at the time of the CAP update (e.g., Senate Bill 32 for year 2030). The CAP update shall include the following:

Every five years City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division in
coordination with
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 218 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 18 ends

Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
• GHG inventories of existing and forecast year GHG levels. • Tools and strategies for reducing GHG emissions to ensure a trajectory with the long-term GHG reduction goal of Executive Order S-03-05.
• Plan implementation guidance that includes, at minimum, the following components consistent with the proposed CAP:
 Administration and Staffing
 Finance and Budgeting
 Timelines for Measure Implementation
 Community Outreach and Education
 Monitoring, Reporting, and Adaptive Management
 Tracking Tools
Furthermore, the following measures will be considered when the City updates the Climate Action Plan:
• Measures to protect the most vulnerable populations
• Measure to increase carbon sinks
• Standards for electric vehicle parking
• Standards for construction projects

5.12 NOISE
N-1 Construction contractors shall implement the following measures for construction activities conducted in the City of Santa Ana. Construction plans submitted to the City shall identify these measures on demolition, grading, and construction plans submitted to the City: The City of Santa Ana Planning and Building Agency shall verify that grading, demolition, and/or construction plans submitted to the City include these notations prior to issuance of demolition, grading, and/or building permits. • Construction activity is limited to the hours: Between 7 AM to 8 PM Monday through Saturday, as prescribed in Municipal Code Section 18-314(e). Construction is prohibited on Sundays. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction shall use the best-available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re-design, Prior to issuance
of demolition,
grading, and/or
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer and
Architect
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 219 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2021 Page 19
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible.
• Impact tools (e.g., jack hammers and hoe rams) shall be hydraulically or electrically powered wherever possible. Where the use of pneumatic tools is unavoidable, an exhaust muffler on the compressed air exhaust shall be used along with external noise jackets on the tools.
• Stationary equipment, such as generators and air compressors shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noise-sensitive uses.
• Stockpiling shall be located as far as feasible from nearby noisesensitive receptors. • Construction traffic shall be limited, to the extent feasible, to approved haul routes established by the City Planning and Building Agency.
• At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, that includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, he/she shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City.
• Signs shall be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on-site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment shall be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise-producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager shall use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the City Council 26 – 220 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 20 ends

N-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a project requiring pile driving during construction within 135 feet of fragile structures, such as historical resources, 100 feet of non-engineered timber and masonry buildings (e.g., most residential buildings), or within 75 feet of engineered concrete and masonry (no plaster); or a vibratory roller within 25 feet of any structure, the project applicant shall prepare a noise and vibration analysis to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer. The vibration levels shall not exceed Federal Transit Administration (FTA) architectural damage thresholds (e.g., 0.12 inches per second [in/sec] peak particle velocity [PPV] for fragile or historical resources, 0.2 in/sec PPV for non-engineered timber and masonry buildings, and 0.3 in/sec PPV for engineered concrete and masonry). If vibration levels would exceed this threshold, alternative uses such as drilling piles as opposed to pile driving and static rollers as opposed to vibratory rollers shall be used. If necessary, construction vibration monitoring shall be conducted to ensure vibration thresholds are not exceeded.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
N-3 New residential projects (or other noise-sensitive uses) located within 200 feet of existing railroad lines shall be required to conduct a groundborne vibration and noise evaluation consistent with Federal Transit Administration (FTA)-approved methodologies.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 221 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2021 Page 21
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
N-4 During the project-level California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process for industrial developments under the General Plan Update or other projects that could generate substantial vibration levels near sensitive uses, a noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to the operations of that individual development. This noise and vibration analysis shall be conducted by a qualified and experienced acoustical consultant or engineer and shall follow the latest CEQA guidelines, practices, and precedents.

Prior to the
issuance of
building permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer and
Acoustical
Engineer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division

5.15 RECREATION
REC-1 The City shall monitor new residential development within the Dyer/55 Fwy focus area. Development proposals for projects including 100 or more residential units shall be required to prepare a public park utilization study to evaluate the project’s potential impacts on existing public parks within a one half (1/2) mile radius to the focus area. The evaluation shall include the population increase due to the project and the potential for the new resident population to impact existing public parks within the radius. Each study shall also consider the cumulative development in the Dyer/55 Fwy and the potential for a cumulative impact on existing public parks within the radius.

If the study determines that the project, or it’s incremental cumulative impacts would result in a significant impact (substantial physical deterioration or substantial acceleration of deterioration) to existing public parks, the project shall be required to mitigate this impact.

Measures to mitigate the significant impact may include but are not limited to land dedication and fair-share contribution to acquire new or to enhance existing public parks within the radius. Mitigation shall be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits.

Prior to the
issuance of
occupancy permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division

5.16 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
CUL-4 For projects with ground disturbance—e.g., grading, excavation, trenching, boring, or demolition that extend below the current grade— prior to issuance of any permits required to conduct ground-disturbing Prior to the
issuance of
grading permits
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
City Council 26 – 222 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 22 ends

Safety
Division
CUL-5 If potentially significant archaeological resources are identified, and impacts cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards to determine significance prior to any ground-disturbing activities. If resources are determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site-specific mitigation measures shall be undertaken.

Prior to any ground
disturbing activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
CUL-6 If the archaeological assessment did not identify archaeological resources but found the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all ground-disturbing construction and pre-construction activities in areas with previously Prior to
construction
activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 223 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2021 Page 23
Table 1-3 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Requirements Mitigation Measure Timing
Responsible
Implementing
Party
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Document
Location
(Monitoring
Record)
Completion Date
Responsible
Monitoring Party
Project Mitigation
Monitor
undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial on-site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the Secretary’s Standards, and tribal consultation shall be conducted in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any collected materials should be determined in consultation with the affiliated tribe(s), where relevant; this could include curation with a recognized scientific or educational repository, transfer to the tribe, or respectful reinternment in an area designated by the tribe.

CUL-7 If an Archaeological Resources Assessment does not identify potentially significant archaeological resources but the site has moderate sensitivity for archaeological resources (Mitigation Measure CUL-4), an archaeologist who meets the Secretary’s Standards shall be retained on call. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery. The pre-construction training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial on-site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on-call archaeologist is contacted. The resource shall be evaluated for significance and tribal consultation shall be conducted, in the case of a tribal resource. If the discovery proves to be significant, the long-term disposition of any Prior to
construction
activities
Project
Applicant/
Developer
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety Division
City of Santa
Ana Building
Safety
Division
City Council 26 – 224 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program

Page 24 ends

City Council 26 – 225 2/15/2022

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE MITIGATION MONITORIN G AND REPORTING PROG RAM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
October 2021 Page 25
This page intentionally left blank.

City Council 26 – 226 2/15/2022
EXHIBIT 3
All materials for Exhibit 3 may be accessed at: https://www.santa-ana.org/generalplan/draft-documents and are also on file and available at the City’s Planning and Building Agency.

City Council 26 – 227 2/15/2022
1 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan
Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text November 29, 2021
The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan, in addition to the clarification of November 1 and November 8, 2021. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes. Updates to maps, tables, time frames, and other edits are either described, shown with tracked changes, or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes.

SAFETY ELEMENT
- Page S-09, POLICY S-4.2 FEDERAL AVIATION REGULATION PART 77. Do not approve buildings and structures that would penetrate Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Obstruction Surfaces, unless, found consistent with the California Public Utilities Code Section 21240, such building or structure is determined by FAA to pose “no hazard” to air aviation.by the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). Additionally, under this Policy,in accordance with FAR Part 77, required applicants proposing buildings or structures that penetrate the 100:1 Notification Surface will be required to file a Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration with FAA and provide a copy of the FAA determination to the City and the ALUC for Orange County.

LAND USE ELEMENT
Figure LU-4, Density and Intensity Map, page LU-16
- Remove outlines to identify GC areas east of the 55 Freeway/Dyer Focus Area and the small parcels with the West Santa Ana Blvd Focus Area to the standard GC of 0.5 FAR.

Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, page LU-17 - Add the following to the end of Footnote 1. “FAR calculations exclude structured parking square footage.”
- Add the following to the end of Footnote 4. “Westview Housing project (SD-97) designated as UN-40 allow density up to 42.5 Du/acre.”
Figure LU-15, Land Use Map, West Santa Ana Boulevard, page LU-48 - Remove the outline and label from the GC areas, with exception of the block of GC located northwest of First Street and Townsend.

City Council 26 – 228 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 2 Table LU-6, Land Use Designations, West Santa Ana Boulevard, page LU-49 - Remove the “GC-1.5” reference and replace with standard “GC” reference (0.5 FAR and 35 feet maximum height) and GC-1 for the block of GC northwest of First Street and Townsend (also 35 feet maximum height).

Figure LU-18, Land Use Map, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, page LU-56 - Add the “GC” label to the area east of the 55 freeway.

Table LU-7, Land Use Designations, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, page LU-56 - Change the 2-story maximum height reference to 35 feet for the CG-1.5 area. - Add a row for General Commercial with 0.5 FAR and 35’ maximum height.

Figure LU-1, Page LU-12:
- Change land use designation on map for the Legacy Sunflower project to UN-50.

Table LU-3, Page LU-17:
- Change Note 4 as follows: Exception Areas. The Lake Center Development, near Lake Center Drive and Susan Street, defined by Specific Development Plan Number 58 (SD-58), allows intensities up to 0.72 FAR. The property located at 4040 W. Carnegie Ave. and approved by GPA No. 2000-08 allows intensities up to 0.47 FAR. Select properties designated UN-30 may also permit Hybrid Court building types with higher residential densities per the Transit Zoning Code.

The 4th and Mortimer project in SD-84 designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Sunflower Legacy project in SD-94 designated UN-50 allows densities up to 63 units per acre.

The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. - Page LU 22, 23, 24 add Footnote #4. “Refer to page LU-14 for Mixed Use Intensity/Density clarification.”
Table LU-4, Page LU-30; Table LU-5, Page LU-40; Table LU-6, Page LU-49; Table LU-7, Page LU-56; Table LU-8, Page LU-62:
- Revise the note as follows: See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for additional notes Note: See Table LU-9 on page LU-68 for additional criteria for all Focus Area designations.

Table LU-9, Page LU-68:
- Revise all references to “Focus Area Interim Development Guidelines” to “Focus Area Interim Development Standards” to ensure that readers understand the City’s intent to use the direction provided in Appendix A as zoning regulations until such time that the City’s Municipal Code is updated.

Land Use Maps:
- Figure LU-1, Page LU-12; Figure LU-4, Page LU-17; and Figure LU-18, Page LU-56: Remove “GC” designation from Hotel Terrace Drive.
- Figure LU-1, Page LU-12 and Figure LU-4, Page LU-16 as follows:

City Council 26 – 229 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 3  Revise the following land use designations approved through prior general Plan amendments: Northeast block of Mountain View and First Street to match existing persuant GPA No. 2020-04. Hapham Project on Edinger Avenue GPA No. 2017-03; Sunflower Legacy Project GPA No. 2019-01; Westview Housing on 17th Street GPA No. 2020- 07.  The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with the existing land use designations (APN 003- 161-10, 144-551-52, 016-045-19, 398-441-06, 411-131-38). No land use changes are proposed for these sites.
 The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with existing right-of-ways and will not be assigned a land use designation (APNs: 411-131-11, 008-131-33, 430-222-18, 430-222-19, 430-222-15, 430-222-17, 430-222-20, 430-222-22, 430-222-23, 398-082-33, 398-221-22, 398-221-23, 430-222-10, & 430-222-11).
 The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number have been revised to coincide with surrounding land uses or City park project (APNs: 396- 261-26, 396-261-38, 396-261-37, 396-261-38, 011-251-17, 011-251-18, 011-251-19, & 011- 251-20)

OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Figure OS-2, Page OS-09 Figure OS-2:
- Change the legend to read “Joint-use Park School“.

Table OS-3 Open Space Element Implementation, Page OS 16:

OS 1.7: Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for lLarger rResidential pProjects to require public parkland within City limits and a 10-minute walking distance of the new residential projects.

OS 1.7a: Open Space and Park land Incentives. Allow developers a reduction in on-site open space by giving credits for the provision of park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize developers to provide additional on-site and/or publicly accessible open space through the coordination between two or more residential projects (of any size) to create public park land and open space, such as exploring open space housing density bonus options.

Research and collaborate with residents, developers, and community organizations to design and implement an open space density bonus to incentivize the creation of additional on-site open space in exchange for more density in the project. Agency/Timeframe: PBA/PRCSA 2022

INTRODUCTION
- Add an Introduction section for the General Plan to provide a brief overview of the GP’s organization, a summary of the update process, and a glossary.

City Council 26 – 230 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan
Draft Policy Framework and Maps
November 8, 2021
The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with draft policy and implementation items displayed with tracked changed. Updates to maps, tables, time frames for implementation actions, and other text edits are either described or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes.

LAND USE ELEMENT
Table LU-5, Land Use Designations, Grand Avenue and 17th Street Table LU-6, Land Use Designations, West Santa Ana Boulevard Table LU-7, Land Use Designations, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Revise General Commercial Land Use designation references in the Focus Areas such that the maximum height is changed from two (2) stories to 35 feet, consistent with height limit in General Commercial land use designations citywide.

Figure LU-18, Land Use Map, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road
- Revise proposed General Commercial (GC) land use designation area east of the 55 Freeway, from 1.5 FAR back to existing 0.5 FAR (consistent with the existing land uses and zoning district allowances).

Figure LU-19, Artist Rendering, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road - Note #2, General Commercial “The area surrounding….allowing for existing hotel uses on both sides of the 55 Freeway to remain and promoting new commercial development.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Figure M-2, Master Plan of Bikeways
- Revise to show the following:

1. Newhope Street (New Class II)
a. between McFadden Avenue to 1st Street
b. between Hazard Avenue to Westminster Avenue

2. McFadden Avenue between West City Limit to Harbor Boulevard (New Class II)

3. Fairview Street (New Class I)
1 City Council 26 – 231 2/15/2022
Clarification to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 8, 2021 2 a. Between Civic Center Drive and Trask Avenue
b. Between Warner Avenue and Sunflower Avenue

4. Susan Street between Alton Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard (New Class II)

5. Santa Ana River (New Class I)
a. between Edinger Avenue and MacArthur Boulevard
b. between Memory Lane and SR-22

6. PE ROW between Westminster Avenue and Raitt Street (New Class I)

7. OCFCD (New Class I)
a. between Westminster Avenue and West City Limit
b. between 1st Street and Monta Vista Avenue
c. between Occidental Street and Alton Avenue
d. between Edinger Avenue and Sunflower Avenue

8. LOSSAN Corridor between 6th Street and Chestnut Avenue (New Class I)

9. Greenville Street between Edinger Avenue and Warner Avenue (New Class II)

10. Willits Street between Orange County District Flood Channel and Raitt Street (Class IV to Class II)

11. Walnut Avenue (Class II to Class III)
a. between 1st street and Raitt Street
b. between west of Pacific Avenue and Pacific Avenue

12. Bristol Street between Edinger Avenue and Washington Avenue (New Class IV)

13. Civic Center Drive between Bristol Street and Broadway (New Class II)

14. Chestnut Avenue between Cypress Avenue and Grand Avenue (New Class II)

15. Cypress Avenue between Chestnut Avenue and 1st Street (New Class II)

16. Standard Avenue between 1st Street and 4th Street (New Class II)

17. 5th Street French Street to Lacy Street (New Class II)

18. Lacy Street between 5th Street and 6th Street (New Class III)

19. Brown Street between Lacy Street and Garfield Street (New Class IV)

20. Garfield Street between Brown Street and 6th Street (New Class IV)

21. 1st Street between Grand Avenue and East City Limit (New Class IV)

22. Cabrillo Park Drive between 1st Street and 4th Street (New Class II)

23. Grand Avenue (New Class II)
a. between 21st Street and Fairhaven Avenue
b. 1st Street and 4th Street

24. Fairhaven Avenue Dayna Street to East City Limit (New Class IV)

25. Sunflower Avenue Bristol Street to Main Street (New Class II)

26. Warner Avenue Pullman Street to Red Hill Avenue (New Class II) Implementation Action M-4.4
- Reevaluate the Residential Permit Parking Program to ensure it complies with state law and best practices.

City Council 26 – 232 2/15/2022
1 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan
Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text November 1, 2021
The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes. Updates to maps, tables, time frames, and other edits are either described, shown with tracked changes, or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes.

VISION STATEMENT [each element]

A SHARED VISION
Santa Ana is a city that promotes the health and wellness of all residents, with a civic culture that actively embraces the power of diversity. Our city invests in resources that create economic opportunities for the next generation, and it is a community that celebrates our past while working together to create a sustainable future.

CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Implementation Action 1.19
- Climate Action Plan. Review and update the City’s Climate Action Plan. Time frame: 2023 [updated to reflect Council Climate Action Resolution on 9/7/21] Table CN-1, CalEnviroScreen Scores for Environmental Justice Communities - The table was updated with the final CES 4.0 results, which were finalized and released in October 2021. Based on the final composite scores, two census tracts were added that met the 75th percentile criteria (6059074005 and 6059074106) and one census tract was removed that no longer met the 75th percentile criteria (6059074004). The individual composite, pollution, and population percentile scores, as well as the individual pollution and population variables were also updated based on the finalized CES 4.0 results.

Figure CN-3, Environmental Justice Communities
- The map updated with the final CalEnviroScreen (CES) 4.0 results, which were finalized and released in October 2021. Based on the final composite scores, two census tracts were added that met the 75th percentile criteria (6059074005 and 6059074106) and one census tract was removed that no longer met the 75th percentile criteria (6059074004).

City Council 26 – 233 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 2 OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
- POLICY OS-1.2 PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM*
Provide and support a comprehensive and integrated network of parks, recreation facilities, trails, and open space that is diverse, with a variety of active and passive recreational opportunities.
- POLICY OS-1.3 PARK STANDARD*
Establish and maintain public parks, open space, and recreation requirements for new residential and nonresidential development to provide sufficient opportunities for Santa Ana residents and visitors. Attain a minimum of two acres of land per 1,000 persons residing in the City of Santa Ana.
- POLICY OS 1.4 PARK DISTRIBUTION*
Ensure the City residents have access to public or private parks, recreation facilities, or trails in the City of Santa Ana, within 10-minute walking and biking distance of home.

Prioritize provision, programs, and partnerships in park deficient an environmental justice areas. [Policy OS-1.4 was left out of the August 2021 draft due to an editing error and showed up as a duplicate of Policy OS-1.5.]
Implementation Action 1.7
- Public parkland requirements for residential projects. Update the Residential Development Fee Ordinance for Larger Residential Projects to require public parkland within City limits and a 10- minute walking distance of the new residential projects. Allow developers a reduction in on-site open space by giving credits for the provision of park land for public use. Establish a process and program to incentivize publicly accessible open space through the coordination between two or more residential projects (of any size) to create public park land and open space, such as exploring housing density bonus options .

Implementation Action 1.16 [new action]
- Acquisitions to meet park standard. Using the Park Master Plan as guidance, identify and acquire property within the City for park and open space use which will focus on bringing the park and recreation system to 2 acres of land per 1,000 residents with a plan to keep pace with future urban growth.

Agency/Time Frame: PRCSA 2022 & ongoing
Table OS-1, Open Space Resources
- The table (listing and acreage) was updated to recategorize Roosevelt Community Center from a Neighborhood Park to as a joint-use facility and a part of the Roosevelt Community Center Park. - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to remove Griset Park and Neal Machander Tennis Center as both facilities are school facilities without joint-use agreements. - The table (listing and acreage) was updated to rename “Willard Intermediate Park” to “Willard Intermediate Playlot”, with the acreage figure update to reflect more accurate boundaries.

City Council 26 – 234 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 3 - The table (listing) was updated rename “Willard Intermediate Park” to “Willard Intermediate School”.
- The table (listing and acreage) was updated to remove Spurgeon Intermediate and Rosita Elementary schools as joint-use agreements are no longer active. - The table was updated to correct the number of linear miles of City bikeways/trails from 22.7 to

15.74 miles.
- The table was updated to incorporate the numerical references found on Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources.

Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources
- The map was corrected to be consistent with Figure M-2, Master Plan of Bikeways. The correction involved the removal of the Class I Bikeway/Trail segment west of Broadway. - The map was corrected to reflect changes in Table OS-1, to correct the categorization of Standard and McFadden as a public park, to remove the sole private park, and to update the legend accordingly.

Figure OS-2, Walking Distance to Park Facilities
- The map was updated to reflect the correct darker blue colorization for the Joint-use Park symbology, to reflect changes in Table OS-1, and to reflect a more accurate listing of joint-use facilities.

SAFETY ELEMENT
Table of Contents
- The reference date for the City’s draft Local Hazard Mitigation Plan was updated from March 2021 to August 2021 to reflect the latest version.

Preamble, page S 01
- The following text was added to specifically incorporate the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan by reference into the General Plan.
“The Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for the City of Santa Ana planning area was developed in accordance with the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) and followed FEMA’s 2011 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan guidance. The LHMP incorporates a process where hazards are identified and profiled, the people and facilities at risk are analyzed, and mitigation actions are developed to reduce or eliminate hazard risk. The implementation of these mitigation actions, which include both short and long-term strategies, involve planning, policy changes, programs, projects, and other activities.”

LAND USE ELEMENT
- POLICY LU-1.6 TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT
City Council 26 – 235 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 4 Encourage residential mixed-use development within the city’s District Centers, Urban Neighborhoods, and adjacent to high-quality transit.
- POLICY LU-2.8 CITY IMAGE
Encourage land uses, development projects, and public art installations that promote the city’s image as a cultural, governmental, and business-friendly regional center Implementation Action 3.25
- LU IA 3.25 Engage EJ communities. Work with community serving organizations, neighborhood leaders, and residents to form an Ad Hoc Committee to develop ongoing EJ Community Engagement programs for existing and new disadvantaged EJ communities, including multilingual communication protocols. Host biannual or quarterly Roundtable meetings with local stakeholders to guide and evaluate implementation of environmental justice policies.

Table LU-3, Density and Intensity Standards, page LU 17 - The table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations. - The table was revised to provide more specific maximum intensity and height standards for the MainPlace (DC-2.1) and City Place (DC-2.54) development areas that align with the approved zoning.
- Footnote 2, Typical Maximum Height, was revised as follows to add additional language to ensure that readers understand the City’s intent to govern height through general plan policy standards and zoning regulations:

Typical Maximum Height. The typical maximum heights identify the upper limit of a typical building height within each density and intensity category, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed in this table. The allowable height of development on any parcel is subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code) and, if within a focus area, the focus area maximum height (starting on page LU-26 of this element), both of which may further restrict the allowable height. Some properties within a height district, as defined in Section 41-602 of the municipal code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights above the typical maximum height depicted here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standard where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown in this table. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay - subzone Village Center = 6 story max, subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - subzone Transit Node = 10 story max, subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, subzone Corridor = 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - subzone Corridor = 3 story max. - Revised Footnote 4, Exception Areas, to add the following language:

The 4th and Mortimer project designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre.

City Council 26 – 236 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 5 Figure LU-1, Land Use Map, page LU 12
- The map was revised to reflect the Change from DC-5 to UN-50 for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Center.

Figure LU-4, Density and Intensity Map, page LU 16
- The map was revised to change:
o From DC-3 to DC 2.1 for the MainPlace SP
o From DC-3 to DC 2.54 for the City Place development
o From DC-3 to DC-5 for portions of the Harbor Corridor SP designated as Transit Node o From DC-5 to UN-50 for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Center o From UN-20 to UN-40 for portions of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Corridor o From UN-50 to UN -30 for portion of the Transit Zoning Code designated as Urban Neighborhood 2
Table of Contents
- The title of Appendix A was revised from “Focus Area Interim Development Guidelines” to “Focus Area Interim Development Standards” to ensure that readers understand the City’s intent to use the direction provided in Appendix A as zoning regulations until such time that the City’s Municipal Code is updated.

Caption to image before preamble
- Sana Ana County Seat and Downtown.

Introduction, page LU 02
- The city has also expanded beyond its historic role as the civic center and County Seat of Orange County and is emerging as the county’s cultural and economic hub.

Density and Intensity Standards, page LU 14
- First paragraph under previous header of “DENSITY AND INTENSITY IN SANTA ANA” moved to be first paragraph at the top of the page.
- Nonresidential Intensity
Floor area ratio (FAR) is a measurement used to identify nonresidential land use intensity. The FAR is the ratio of the total gross floor area of all buildings on a lot compared to the total area of that lot.

Higher FARs generally indicate larger buildings and/or more stories, but Figure LU-3, Floor Area Ratio (FAR), illustrates that the size and height of the building can vary a great deal within the same FAR. Note, FAR is also a measure used in mixed-use area buildout as described below.

City Council 26 – 237 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 6 To encourage a dynamic mixture of residential, office, clean industrial, and commercial uses in mixed-use areas (Industrial/Flex, Urban Neighborhood, One Broadway Plaza District Center, and District Center1
), when both residential and nonresidential uses are planned the density… [added Footnote 1]:

1. District Centers that are part of a special planning area, as shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to special development standards may be regulated by FAR alone. - Rounding [new text]
When calculating the square footage allowed for a proposed development, no upward rounding is permitted in determining the final permitted intensity. Likewise, no upward rounding is permitted in calculating the allowable number of residential units. For example, in a calculation producing a yield of 12.7 units for a given development site, 12 units are permitted.

Footnote 1, Typical Maximum Height, pages LU 18, 19, and 21

1. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. Some properties within a height district, per Section 41-602 of the Municipal Code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights in excess of the typical maximum height shown here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page.

Industrial / Flex category revisions, page LU 22
- Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations.

Typical Maximum Height Footnote 1, page LU 22

UN category revisions, page LU 23
- Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations.

Typical Maximum Height Footnote 2, page LU 23
- Mixed Use Density and Intensity
City Council 26 – 238 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 1, 2021 7 2. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown on this page. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - UN-30 in subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, UN-50 in subzone Corridor = 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - UN-40 in subzone Corridor = 3 story max.

UN-30 Footnote 3, page LU 23

3. UN-30 designations in the South Bristol Street Focus Area have a maximum height of 3 stories (see Table LU-8 on page LU-62). Where the maximum height allowed in a focus area conflicts with the height shown on this page, the focus area maximum height shall prevail. The 4th and Mortimer project designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac.

DC category revisions, page LU 24
- DC 2.1 and DC 2.54 categories added table with description of DC land uses, with maximum intensity and height standards to align with the approved zoning. - Maximum Intensity in table was revised to clarify that density and intensity may be regulated by floor area ratio (FAR) and/or dwelling units per acre (du/acre) for mixed use designations.

Footnote 2, page LU 24

2. The typical maximum height identifies the upper limit of typical building height, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed on this page. The allowable height of development on any parcel is also subject to the zoning standards (Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further specify allowable height. Some properties within a height district, per Section 41-602 of the Municipal Code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights in excess of the typical maximum height shown here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standards where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown. This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay - DC-3 in subzone Village Center = 6 story max, DC-3 in subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - DC-5 in subzone Transit Node = 10 story max.

Footnote 4, page LU 24 [new text]

4. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre.

City Council 26 – 239 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
ABOUT THE MAP. This map displays the City's long-term plan for a comprehensive bicycle network, with a hierarchy of facilities that provide varying levels of design, signage, and separation from vehicles. The City intends to provide a safe and efficient system that reduces the reliance on the automobiles and facilitates an increase in bicycling by choice. Table M-2 describes each bicycle classification.

Figure M-2

MASTER PLAN OF BIKEWAYS
ORANGE
TUSTIN

GARDEN GROVE

COSTA MESA

FOUNTAIN VALLEY
IRVINE
McFadden Ave
Talbert Ave
Tustin St
1st St
Main St
17th St
Warner Ave
Dyer Rd
Harbor Blvd
Edinger Ave
Bristol St
Red
Hill Ave
Civic Center Dr
La Veta Ave
Euclid St
4th St
Chestnut Ave
Flower St
Hazard Ave
Grand Ave
Garden Grove Blvd
Santa Ana Blvd
Ra itt St
Bear St
Westminster Ave
Alton Ave
Standard Ave
MacArthur Blvd
Newhope St
Fairview St
Segerstrom Ave
Fairhaven Ave
Santa Clara Ave Trask Ave
Alton Pkwy
Slater Ave
Broadway
Tustin Ave
Barranca Pkwy
|ÿ
|ÿ
%&'(
%&'(
|ÿ
22 22
55 405
5 0 0.5 1
Miles
Source: City of Santa Ana (2020)
Master Plan of Bikeways
Date Published: 11/8/2021
LOSSAN Corridor
Class III Bike Route / Boulevard
Class IV Cycle Track
Class I Path
Class II Bike Lane
M
08 City Council 26 – 240 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
Table CN-1. CALENVIROSCREEN SCORES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES Census
Tract Neighborhood(s)
Low
Income
Percentile Score & Quartile Rank Variables in the Upper Quartile Composite Pollution Population Pollution Population
6059074003 Delhi No 86 99 56 AQ | DPM |TD | CS
| GW | HZ | L LB
6059074300 Delhi, Madison Park Yes 89 93 73 AQ | CS | GW | HZ | L | SW LB | ED | HB
6059074200 Delhi, Madison Park,
Memorial Park Yes 81 82 71 AQ | GW | L | HZ ED | LI |POV 6059074005
Sunwood Central,
Rosewood Baker, South
Coast
Yes 76 79 65 AQ | L ED | LI
6059074108 Centennial Park Yes 82 89 66 AQ | L | CS |HZ LB |ED 6059074106 n/a Yes 76 89 56 AQ | CS | GW | HZ LB | ED
6059074109 Valley Adams Yes 77 81 65 AQ | L |HZ ED | HB 6059089004 Riverview West Yes 82 77 77 AQ | DPM | L ED| LI | POV | HB 6059089001 Riverview West Yes 80 70 79 AQ ED | LI | POV | HB 6059089105 Santa Anita Yes 81 65 83 AQ | L | TD ED | LI | POV | HB 6059074403 Cornerstone Village,
Lyon St Yes 81 94 57 AQ | TD | CS | HZ ED| LI| POV | HB 6059074406 Lyon St, Saddleback
View Yes 93 94 79 AQ | DPM | TD | CS | SW | L
ED| LI| POV | HB
| LB
6059074602 Madison Park, Pacific
Park Yes 82 83 72 AQ| CS | HZ| L ED| LI| POV | HB
6059074502 Cedar Evergreen,
Madison Park Yes 88 90 76 AQ | CS | GW | HZ L ED| LI | POV | HB 6059074405
French Court, French
Park, Lacy, Logan,
Pacific Park
Yes 91 94 77 AQ | DPM | TD | CS
| SW | L ED | LI | POV | HB
6059075002
Downtown, French Park,
Heninger Park, Lacy,
Pacific Park, Willard
Yes 90 83 86 AQ | DPM | CS | HZ
| SW | L LB | ED| LI | POV
Rankings
Quartile 1 = Good Quartile 2 = Moderate Quartile 3 = Poor Quartile 4= Challenged (Upper) Variable in the CES 4.0 model:

Pollution Exposure
AQ = Air Quality (incl.

Ozone, PM2.5, Toxic Releases)
DPM - Diesel Particulate Matter
TD = Traffic Density
L = Lead
Environmental Effects
CS = Toxic Cleanup Sites
GW: Groundwater Threats
HZ = Hazardous Waste
SW = Solid Waste Sites/Facilities
Sensitive Population
LB = Low Birth Weight
Socioeconomic Factors
LI = Linguistic Isolation
POV = Poverty
HB = Housing Burden
ED = Educational Attainment
UE = Unemployment
Note: Indicators not ranked in upper quartile: air quality (ozone); air quality (PM2.5); drinking water contaminants; pesticide use; impaired water bodies; asthma; cardiovascular disease; unemployment. Low income status consistent with Assembly Bill 1550 and mapping by the California Air Resources Board.

CN
16 City Council 26 – 241 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
Rankings
Quartile 1 = Good Quartile 2 = Moderate Quartile 3 = Poor Quartile 4= Challenged (Upper) Variable in the CES 4.0 model:

Pollution Exposure
AQ = Air Quality (incl.

Table CN-1. CALENVIROSCREEN SCORES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES 6059074901 Flower Park, Heninger
Park, Pico Lowell Yes 88 76 87 AQ | CS | HZ | L ED| LI | POV | UE 6059075201 Artesia Pillar Yes 84 81 78 AQ | HZ | L LB | ED | LI | POV | UE | HB
6059075202 Artesia Pilar Yes 82 84 72 AQ | CS | HZ | L ED | LI | UE | HB 6059074801 Artesia Pilar, Central City Yes 85 83 77 AQ | HZ | L ED | LI | POV 6059075004 French Court, Santa Ana
Triangle Yes 83 79 76 AQ | DPM | TD | L ED | LI | POV | HB 6059074805 Bella Vista Yes 77 63 79 AQ ED | LI | POV | HB 6059075100
Flower Park, Washington
Square, Willard, Floral
Park, West Floral Park
Yes 77 83 64 AQ | CS | HZ | L ED | LI
6059074802 Casa Bonita, Artesia Pilar Yes 76 88 58 AQ | CS | HZ | L ED | LI | POV

CONSERVATION
CN
17 City Council 26 – 242 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
|ÿ
|ÿ
%&'(
%&'(
|ÿ
ORANGE
TUSTIN

GARDEN GROVE

COSTA MESA

FOUNTAIN VALLEY
IRVINE
22 22
55 405
5 Main St
17Th St
McFadden Ave
Talbert Ave
Tustin St
1St St
Warner Ave
Dyer Rd
Harbor Blvd
Bristol St
Red
Hill Ave
Civic Center Dr
La Veta Ave
Euclid St
4Th St
Chestnut Ave
Edinger Ave Flower St
Hazard Ave
Grand Ave
Garden Grove Blvd
Santa Ana Blvd
Raitt St
Bear St
Westminster Ave
Alton Ave
Standard Ave
5Th St
MacArthur Blvd
Newhope St
Fairview St
Segerstrom Ave
Fairhaven Ave
Santa Clara Ave Trask Ave
Alton Pkwy
Slater Ave
Broadway
Tustin Ave
Barranca Pkwy
0 0.5 1
Miles
Date Published: 11/1/2021
EJ Communities
Source: CalEnviroScreen 4.0
Environmental Justice Communities
ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the boundaries of Santa Ana’s environmental justice communities based on data from CalEPA’s CalEnviroScreen tool. The boundaries represent the areas where the City’s policies will emphasize and prioritize improving existing environmental conditions, expanding access to public facilities and resources, and augmenting opportunities for civic engagement.

Figure CN-3

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE COMMUNITIES
Environmental Justice Community: The City uses a mapping tool from CalEPA called CalEnviroScreen (CES) to identify the most vulnerable and disadvantaged areas in Santa Ana. The CES tool measures 21 indicators for every census tract in California related to people’s exposure to pollution and quality of life. The results for each census tract are combined and measured against every other census tract, producing a composite score that ranks census tracts from the least impacted to the most impacted. Those ranked in the top 25 percent—shown with values between 75 and 100 percent—are considered disadvantaged or environmental justice communities.

CONSERVATION
CN
15 City Council 26 – 243 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
Table OS-1. OPEN SPACE RESOURCES
Park Name Acres Park Name Acres Park Name Acres
COMMUNITY PARKS 168.10

1. Carl Thornton Park 32.70 3. Jerome Park 19.27 5. Santiago Park 34.57

2. Centennial Regional Park 65.26 4. Memorial Park 16.30 -- -- NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS 145.86

6. Adams Park 5.68 14. Edna Park 3.56 22. Portola Park 9.07

7. Angels Community Park 1.60 15. El Salvador Park 8.91 23. Riverview Park 8.33

8. Birch Park 2.37 16. Fisher Park 2.58 24. Rosita Park 8.68

9. Bomo Koral Park 10.40 17. Heritage Park 6.44 25. Sandpointe Park 7.73

10. Cabrillo Park 7.60 18. Lillie King Park 10.40 26. Santa Anita Park 5.05

11. Cabrillo Tennis Center 3.61 19. Mabury Park 5.46 27. Windsor Park 10.81

12. Cesar Chavez Campesino Park 6.48 20. Madison Park 6.04 -- --

13. Delhi Park 9.94 21. Morrison Park 5.12 -- --
SMALL PARKS 11.84

28. 17th Street Triangle 0.70 34. Garfield Fitness Park 0.10 40. Raitt and Myrtle 1.09

29. Chepa's Park 0.41 35. Maple Occidental Exercise Park 0.96 41. Saddleback View Park 0.92

30. Colonel William W. Eldridge Park 1.20 36. Mariposa Park 0.43 42. Sarah May Downie Herb Garden 0.13

31. Fairview Triangle 0.74 37. McFadden Triangle Park 0.77 43. Segerstrom Triangle Park 1.33

32. French Park 0.21 38. Memory Lane Park 0.56 44. Standard and McFadden Park 0.66

33. Friendship Park 0.10 39. Pacific Electric Park 1.41 45. Willard Intermediate Playlot 0.12 SPECIALTY PARKS 24.78

46. Civic Center Plaza 4.89 48. Santa Ana Zoo at Prentice Park 18.75 -- --

47. Plaza Calle Cuatro 0.20 49. Sasscer Park 0.94 -- -- JOINT-USE SCHOOL/REC AREAS 31.78

50. Garfield Community Center 0.39 53. Madison Elementary School 0.03 56. Willard Intermediate School 4.85

51. Godinez Fundamental High School 18.58 54. Monte Vista Elementary School 2.40 -- --

52. James Monroe Elementary School 2.91 55. Roosevelt Community Center Park 2.62 -- -- OTHER OPEN SPACE 282.77

57. River View Golf Course 81.78 59. Fairhaven Memorial Cemetery 66.83 61. St. John’s Lutheran Cemetery 4.23

58. Willowick Golf Course 102.11 60. Santa Ana Cemetery 27.82 -- -- CLASS I BIKEWAY/TRAILS - 19.44 MILES
City Bikeways/Trails - 15.74 miles Santa Ana River Trail - 3.70 miles -- TOTAL PARKS/REC FACILITIES - 382.36 ACRES TOTAL OTHER OPEN SPACE - 282.77 ACRES TOTAL TRAILS - 19.44 MILES Notes: The numbering corresponds to the labels on Figure OS-1, Open Space Resources. The list of parks and acreage figures are accurate as of October 2021.

All figures are subject to rounding.

OS
08 City Council 26 – 244 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the number, type, and distribution of open space areas in Santa Ana, with the majority representing parks and trails owned and operated by the City. The City also maintains joint-use agreements with schools to expand public parks and recreation resources.

Golf course and cemetery areas provide a more limited form of recreation or open space. See Table OS-1, Open Space Resources, for a listing of parks and open space resources with numbering that is consistent with the labels on this figure.

Figure OS-1

OPEN SPACE RESOURCES
|ÿ
|ÿ
%&'(
%&'(
|ÿ
ORANGE
TUSTIN

GARDEN GROVE

COSTA MESA

FOUNTAIN VALLEY
IRVINE
22 22
55 405
5 Main St
17Th St
McFadden Ave
Talbert Ave
Tustin St
1St St
Warner Ave
Dyer Rd
Harbor Blvd
Bristol St
Red
Hill Ave
Civic Center Dr
La Veta Ave
Euclid St
4Th St
Chestnut Ave
Edinger Ave Flower St
Hazard Ave
Grand Ave
Garden Grove Blvd
Santa Ana Blvd
Raitt St
Bear St
Westminster Ave
Alton Ave
Standard Ave
5Th St
MacArthur Blvd
Newhope St
Fairview St
Segerstrom Ave
Fairhaven Ave
Santa Clara Ave Trask Ave
Alton Pkwy
Slater Ave
Broadway
Tustin Ave
Barranca Pkwy
28 36
6 7 8
9 10
11 2
12 29
30 13
14 15
31 16
32 33
34 17
3 18
19 20
37 4
38 21
40 39
47 22
23 24
41 25
48 26
5 5
42 49
43 1
27 56
45 55
52 50
53 51
58 60
61 59
57 44
54 35
46 0 0.5 1
Miles
Date Published: 11/22/2021
Open Space Plan
Source: City of Santa Ana 2021
Open Space Type
Community Park Class 1 Bikeway/Trail (Existing & Planned) Neighborhood Park
Small Park
Specialty Park
Joint-use School
Golf Course
Cemetery

OPEN SPACE
OS
07 City Council 26 – 245 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
ABOUT THE MAP. This map shows the walking distance from publicly accessible parks. This map can help identify neighborhoods that may be underserved or have limited access to parks and recreation facilities. The City seeks to ensure an equitable distribution of access to these facilities for all Santa Ana residents.

Figure OS-2

WALKING DISTANCE TO PARK FACILITIES
|ÿ
|ÿ
%&'(
%&'(
|ÿ
ORANGE
TUSTIN

GARDEN GROVE

COSTA MESA

FOUNTAIN VALLEY
IRVINE
22 22
55 405
5 Main St
17Th St
McFadden Ave
Talbert Ave
Tustin St
1St St
Warner Ave
Dyer Rd
Harbor Blvd
Bristol St
Red
Hill Ave
Civic Center Dr
La Veta Ave
Euclid St
4Th St
Chestnut Ave
Edinger Ave Flower St
Hazard Ave
Grand Ave
Garden Grove Blvd
Santa Ana Blvd
Raitt St
Bear St
Westminster Ave
Alton Ave
Standard Ave
5Th St
MacArthur Blvd
Newhope St
Fairview St
Segerstrom Ave
Fairhaven Ave
Santa Clara Ave Trask Ave
Alton Pkwy
Slater Ave
Broadway
Tustin Ave
Barranca Pkwy
0 0.5 1
Miles
Date Published: 11/29/2021
Park Service Areas
Source: City of Santa Ana 2021
Park Type
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Small Park
Walking Distance From Existing or Proposed Park
1/4 Mile
1/2 Mile
Current or Future Residential Area more than 1/2 Mile
Walking Distance from an Existing or Planned Park Facility Specialty Park
Class 1 Bikeway/Trail
(Existing & Planned)
Joint-use School

OPEN SPACE
OS
09 City Council 26 – 246 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
|ÿ
|ÿ
%&'(
%&'(
|ÿ
ORANGE
TUSTIN

GARDEN GROVE

COSTA MESA

FOUNTAIN VALLEY
IRVINE
22 22
55 405
5 Main St
17Th St
McFadden Ave
Talbert Ave
Tustin St
1St St
Warner Ave
Dyer Rd
Harbor Blvd
Bristol St
Red
Hill Ave
Civic Center Dr
La Veta Ave
Euclid St
4Th St
Chestnut Ave
Edinger Ave Flower St
Hazard Ave
Grand Ave
Garden Grove Blvd
Santa Ana Blvd
Ra itt St
Bear St
Westminster Ave
Alton Ave
Standard Ave
5Th St
MacArthur Blvd
Newhope St
Fairview St
Segerstrom Ave
Fairhaven Ave
Santa Clara Ave Trask Ave
Alton Pkwy
Slater Ave
Broadway
Tustin Ave
Barranca Pkwy
0 0.5 1
Miles
Date Published: 11/30/2021
Proposed General Plan Land Use
Source: City of Santa Ana 2021
General Plan Land Use
LR-7, Low Density Residential
LMR-11, Low-Medium Density Residential
MR-15, Medium Density Residential
CR-30, Corridor Residential
PAO, Professional and Administrative Office
INS, Institutional
GC, General Commercial
OS, Open Space UN, Urban Neighborhood
DC, District Center
OBPDC, One Broadway Plaza District Center
FLEX, Industrial/Flex
IND, Industrial
Figure LU-1

LAND USE MAP
About the Map. Figure LU-1 shows the fundamental pattern of land use by displaying the pattern and distribution of land use designations across the entire city, down to the parcel level.

LU
12 City Council 26 – 247 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
|ÿ
|ÿ
%&'(
%&'(
|ÿ
ORANGE
TUSTIN

GARDEN GROVE

COSTA MESA

FOUNTAIN VALLEY
IRVINE
22 22
55 405
5 Main St
17Th St
McFadden Ave
Talbert Ave
Tustin St
1St St
Warner Ave
Dyer Rd
Harbor Blvd
Bristol St
Red
Hill Ave
La Veta Ave
Euclid St
Grand Ave
4Th St
Chestnut Ave
Edinger Ave Flower St
Hazard Ave
Garden Grove Blvd
Tustin Ave
Santa Ana Blvd
Ra itt St
Bear St
Westminster Ave
Alton Ave
Standard Ave
5Th St
MacArthur Blvd
Newhope St
Fairview St
Segerstrom Ave
Fairhaven Ave
Santa Clara Ave Trask Ave
Alton Pkwy
Slater Ave
Broadway
Barranca Pkwy
DC-1.5
UN-30
UN-30
UN-30
UN-30
UN-30
UN-20
UN-20
UN-20
UN-20 GC-1
PAO-1
PAO-1
PAO-1
UN-40 UN-40
UN-40
DC-3
DC-3 DC-3
DC-2.54
DC-2.1
DC-5
DC-5
DC-5
DC-5
DC-5
DC-1
DC-1
DC-1
FLEX-1.5
GC-1.5
UN-50 UN-50 UN-50
DC-2 DC-2
DC-2
DC-2
UN-30
FLEX-1.5
FLEX-3
FLEX-3
FLEX-3
UN-30
UN-30
DC-5
UN-50 UN-50
UN-30
UN-30
UN30
UN-40
UN-20
UN20
UN-20 UN-20
GC-1
GC-1
PAO-1
PAO-1
PAO-1.5
PAO-1.5
PAO-1.5
DC-1
DC-1
FLEX-1.5
PAO-2
GC-1
UN-50
UN-50
FLEX1.5
DC-1.5
DC-1.5
OBPDC
UN40
0 0.5 1
Miles
Date Published: 11/30/2021
Proposed General Plan Density and Intensity Categories
Source: City of Santa Ana 2021
General Plan Land Use
LR-7, Low Density Residential
LMR-11, Low-Medium Density Residential
MR-15, Medium Density Residential
CR-30, Corridor Residential
PAO, Professional and Administrative Office
INS, Institutional
GC, General Commercial
OS, Open Space UN, Urban Neighborhood
DC, District Center
OBPDC, One Broadway Plaza District Center
FLEX, Industrial/Flex
IND, Industrial
Figure LU-4

DENSITY AND INTENSITY MAP
About the Map. Figure LU-4 combined with Table LU-3 describe the general plan standards for development intensity and density and show where they apply.

LU
16 City Council 26 – 248 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
Table LU-3. DENSITY AND INTENSITY STANDARDS
Land Use Designation Maximum
Density/ Intensity1
Typical
Max. Height2
Low Density Residential (LR-7) 7 du/ac 2 stories2
Low-Medium Density Residential (LMR-11) 11 du/ac 3 stories2 Medium Density Residential (MR-15) 15 du/ac 3 stories2
Corridor Residential (CR-30) 30 du/ac 3 stories2
Institutional (INS) n/a n/a
Open Space (OS) n/a n/a
Professional and Administrative Office (PAO) 0.5 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories2 PAO-1 Professional and Administrative Office -Medium (PAO-1) 1.0 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories2,3 PAO-1.5 Professional and Administrative Office -Medium High (PAO-1.5) 1.5 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories2 PAO-2 Professional and Administrative Office -High (PAO-2) 2.0 FAR 35 feet or 3 stories2,3 General Commercial (GC) 0.5 35 feet2
GC-1 General Commercial -Medium (GC-1) 1.0 FAR 35 feet2,3 GC-1.5 General Commercial-Medium High (GC-1.5) 1.5 FAR 35 feet2,3 Industrial (IND) 0.45 FAR4 35 feet2
FLEX-1.5 Industrial/Flex- Low (FLEX-1.5) 1.5 FAR and/or 30 du/ac 3 stories2 FLEX-3 Industrial/Flex- Medium (FLEX-3) 3.0 FAR 10 stories2 UN-20 Urban Neighborhood-Low (UN-20) 1.0 FAR and/or 20 du/ac 3 stories2 UN-30 Urban Neighborhood-Medium Low (UN-30) 1.5 FAR and/or 30 du/ac4 4 stories2,3 UN-40 Urban Neighborhood-Medium (UN-40) 1.5 FAR and/or 40 du/ac4 5 stories2 UN-50 Urban Neighborhood-Medium High (UN-50) 1.5 FAR and/or 50 du/ac4 6 stories2 One Broadway Plaza District Center (OBPDC) 2.9 FAR 37 stories2 DC-1 District Center-Low (DC-1) 1.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 6 stories2 DC-1.5 District Center-Medium Low (DC-1.5) 1.5 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 stories2 DC-2 District Center-Medium (DC-2) 2.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 stories2,3 DC-2.1 District Center-Medium (DC-2.1) 2.1 FAR 20 stories DC-2.54 District Center-Medium (DC-2.54) 2.54 FAR 5 stories DC-3 District Center-Medium High (DC-3) 3.0 FAR and/or 90 du/ac 10 stories2 DC-5 District Center-High (DC-5) 5.0 FAR and/or 125 du/ac4 25 stories2,3 Notes:

1. Maximum Density/Intensity. The maximum density/intensity identifies the upper limit of density and intensity allowed within each category. All development is also subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code), which may further restrict the allowable density or intensity. Zoning standards shall not exceed the maximum density/intensity standards herein unless listed as an exception area in the notes below. FAR calculations exclude structured parking square footage.

2. Typical Maximum Height. The typical maximum heights identify the upper limit of a typical building height within each density and intensity category, but the actual maximum standard allowed on each site may be different than listed in this table. The allowable height of development on any parcel is subject to the zoning standards (in Chapter 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code) and, if within a focus area, the focus area maximum height (starting on page LU-26 of this element), both of which may further restrict the allowable height. Some properties within a height district, as defined in Section 41-602 of the municipal code, within an adopted or existing special planning area shown on Figure LU-2, or subject to Specific Development (SD) standards allow heights above the typical maximum height depicted here. The general plan height standard shall equal the zoning height standard where the allowable height in the zoning standards differs from the typical maximum height shown in this table.

This includes, but is not limited to the following: Metro East Mixed-Use Overlay - subzone Village Center = 6 story max, subzone Active Urban = no limit; Harbor Mixed Use Transit Corridor Specific Plan - subzone Transit Node = 10 story max, subzone Neighborhood Transitional = 3 story max, subzone Corridor = 4 story max; Transit Zoning Code - subzone Corridor = 3 story max.

3. Maximum Heights in Focus Areas. Properties inside focus areas with PAO-1, PAO-2, GC-1, GC-1.5, UN-30, DC-2, and DC-5 designations may have a lower maximum height than shown here (see Focus Areas starting on page LU-26 for the maximum heights allowed in each focus area). Where the maximum height allowed in a focus area is lower than the typical maximum height shown in this table, the focus area maximum height shall prevail.

4. Exception Areas. The Lake Center Development, near Lake Center Drive and Susan Street, defined by Specific Development Plan Number 58 (SD-58), allows intensities up to 0.72 FAR. The property located at 4040 W. Carnegie Ave. and approved by GPA No. 2000-08 allows intensities up to 0.47 FAR. Select properties designated UN-30 may also permit Hybrid Court building types with higher residential densities per the Transit Zoning Code. The 4th and Mortimer project in SD-84 designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Sunflower Legacy project in SD-94 designated UN-50 allows densities up to 63 units per acre. The Harbor Corridor Specific Plan District Centers are limited to a max of 90 units per acre. The Westview Housing project (SD-97) designated as UN-40 allows density up to 42.5 du/acre. LU 17LAND USE
City Council 26 – 249 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
|ÿ22

SHINGTON AVE
R DR

FRUIT ST
OLD
GRAND ST 6TH ST
DAR ST

KEMPER AVE

EASTSIDE A
VE

POINSETTIA ST

ALBION AVE

CLARA AVE
14TH ST

LINCOLN A
VE

FAIRWAY DR

INIA AVE
M

ABURY ST
PENN
WAY

RIVER AVE

GROVEMONT ST

FULLER ST

CHALYNN AVE
RD

WRIGHT ST
LK LN
FAIRM

O NT ST
VALEN
CIA
AVE
LINW
O
OD A
VE
AK ST
D ST

NNIE ST

WELLINGTON AVE

MIRASOL ST

CONCORD RD
LARCHM
ONT A
VE
PARK

CENTER DR
18TH ST
ST
M

ANTLE LN
2ND ST
WILLIA
MS ST
LO
G
AN ST

PALM ST

GARFIELD
ST
EASTW
O
OD A
VE

LYON ST
O
AKM
ONT A
VE
FAIRM
ONT A
VE

BUFFALO AVE

AVALON AVE

CATALINA AVE
21ST ST
20TH ST
19TH ST

OLD TUSTIN A
VE
4TH ST
1ST ST

SANTA CLARA AVE

SANTA ANA BLVD
17TH ST

LA VETA AVE

PARKER ST
CA
MBRID
GE ST
GRA
N
D
AVE

UNTRY RD

FAIRHAVEN AVE
LN

GLASSELL ST

TUSTIN ST

CABRILLO PARK DR
M

ABURY ST

LINCOLN A
VE

TUSTIN A
VE
UN-30
UN-30
UN-20
UN-20
G
CGC-1
1 UN-40
FLEX-1.5
DC-2
5 22
Figure LU-11 LAND USE MAP
GRAND AVENUE AND 17TH STREET
Table LU-5. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
GRAND AVENUE AND 17TH STREET
Designation
Maximum
General Character
Intensity Height
DC-2 District Center
-Medium

2.0 FAR or
90 du/ac
6 stories
Transit-oriented urban
village with a wide range
and mix of residential,
live-work, commercial, and
employment-generating uses
UN-20
Urban
Neighborhood
-Low

1.0 FAR or
20 du/ac
3 stories
Medium-high density urban
neighborhoods with a mix
of attached single- and
multifamily housing; mixeduse residential with groundfloor retail, services, and restaurants; cultural uses;
public and open spaces
UN-30
Urban
Neighborhood
-Medium Low

1.5 FAR or
30 du/ac
4 stories
UN-40
Urban
Neighborhood
-Medium

1.5FAR or
40 du/ac
5 stories
FLEX-1.5 Industrial/Flex
-Low 1.5 FAR 3 stories
Office/industrial flex spaces,
small-scale R&D, clean
manufacturing
GC-1
General
Commercial
-Medium

1.0 FAR 35
feet
Shopping, restaurants,
entertainment, service
commercial
Notes:

The focus area also includes a nominal amount of land used by railroad operations and mapped with the Open Space land use designation.

See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for additional notes.

LU
40 City Council 26 – 250 2/15/2022
'
'
'

CLARA ST

GATES ST
EN

GLISH ST

MORNINGSIDE AVE
KING
ST
JA
CKSO
N ST

WEST ST
RO
XEY
DR
H
URO
N
DR

SUNSWEPT AVE

HAZARD AVE

A BETTER
WAY
H

ARPER ST
ME
M
LA

UREL ST
SUSA
N ST
D

AISY ST
G
U
N
T
HER ST

BEWLEY ST
FIG
UERO
A ST
BUEN
A ST
G
U
N
T
HER PL
CLIN
T
O
N ST
10TH ST

SULLIVA
N ST

QUATRO AVE

SILVER DR
SY
D
NEY ST
D
AISY
AVE

ELAINE DR
18TH

ANABEL AVE

KEEL AVE
NEW
H
OPE S
T
1ST

HAZARD AVE
H
A
R
B
O
R
BLV
D

WESTMINSTER AVE
FAIR
VIEW
S
T
FLEX-1.5
UN-20
UN-20
GC-1
FLEX-1.5
0 500 1,000
Feet
ate: 11/30/2021[

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
Table LU-6. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD Designation
Maximum
General Character
Intensity Height
Low Density
Residential 7 du/ac 2 stories Low-rise single-family neighborhoods Low-Medium
Density
Residential
11 du/ac 2 stories Single-family homes, duplexes, small-lot subdivisions, and mobile-home parks Medium
Density
Residential
15 du/ac 3 stories A mix of low- and medium-rise neighborhoods with single and multifamily housing, including small lot subdivisions, townhomes, live/work units Corridor
Residential 30 du/ac 3 stories
Medium density urban housing, such as attached townhomes and apartments, along corridors or adjacent to areas designated General Commercial, Urban Neighborhood, or District Center
UN-20
Urban
Neighborhood
-Low

1.0 FAR or
20 du/ac 3 stories
Medium density urban neighborhoods with a mix of attached single- and multifamily housing; mixed-use residential with ground-floor retail, services, and restaurants; cultural uses; and public and open spaces UN-30
Urban
Neighborhood
-Medium Low

1.5 FAR or
30 du/ac 4 stories
Figure LU-15 LAND USE MAP

WEST SANTA ANA BOULEVARD
LU
48 City Council 26 – 251 2/15/2022
' '
'
' '
' '
'
' '
8TH ST
BIRC
H ST
PENN
WAY
M

APLE ST
WESTW
O
O
D
AVE

WALNUT ST

CIVIC CENTER DR
2ND ST
FREEM
A
N ST
5TH ST

SPURGEO
N ST

BUSH ST
19TH ST
20TH ST
ALO
N
A ST

ROSS ST
FREN
C
H ST

ERIDAY LN

ARTHA LN
SY
C
A
M
ORE ST
6TH ST
21ST ST
LO

WELL ST

OLIVE ST
D

AISY ST
VA
N

NESS AVE
O
AK ST
HELIO

TROPE DR

LIME ST

WESTERN
A
VE
FLO
WER ST

PINE ST

CHESTNUT AVE
16TH ST

VANCE ST
PART
O
N ST
T
O
W
NER ST
15TH ST

WASHINGTON AVE
RAIT
T ST
PA
CIFIC
AVE

FOREST ST
3RD ST
4TH ST
FRA

NKLIN ST
ORA
N
GE AVE
C

YPRESS A
VE

BAKER ST
D
URA
N
T ST
7TH ST

GREENLEAF ST
D
AISY
AVE
9TH ST
H ST
VIC
T
ORIA
DR
12TH ST
11TH ST
LO

UISE ST
B
RIS
T
OL S
T
M
AIN
S
T
17TH ST
ST
FLO
WER
S
T
B
R
O
A
D
W
AY

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTA ANA BLVD
R
AIT
T
S
T
4TH ST
5TH ST
UN-30
UN-30
UN-20
PAO-2
West Santa Ana Blvd.
5 CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN
Designation
Maximum
General Character
Intensity Height
GC-1
General
Commercial
-Medium

1.0 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, and service commercial General
Commercial 0.5 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, and service commercial PAO-2
Professional &
Administrative
Office-High

2.0 FAR 3 stories Professional and administrative office and supporting service commercial and restaurants
FLEX-1.5 Industrial/Flex
-Low 1.5 FAR 3 stories Office/industrial flex spaces, small-scale R&D, clean manufacturing, live-work Institutional 2.0 FAR 2 stories Government facilities, public service facilities, and public institutions Open Space n/a 2 stories Recreational and green space, commercial open space, public infrastructure, and rail facilities
' OC Street Car (planned line / station)
Note: See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for notes.

GC
LU
49LAND USE
City Council 26 – 252 2/15/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA GENERAL PLAN

GILLETTE AVE

ADAMS ST

RITCHEY ST
FITCH

NOYES AVE
H
ALLA
D
AY ST

ARMSTRONG AVE

DAIMLER ST

UMBINE AVE

GOETZ AVE
COWAN

SAINTANDREW P L

S KY PARK BLVD

TON C EN

T ER D R
M

APLE ST

ST GERTRUDE PL
RO

USSELLE ST

CENTRAL AVE
O
AK ST
KILSO
N
DR

HICKORY ST
PUL
ML
AN
ST

MITCHELL
CED
AR ST

EVERGREEN ST

HALE AVE
LY
O
N ST
WRIG
H
T ST

REYNOLDS AVE

DEERE AVE

MILLIKAN AVE

SKY PARK CIR

ASTON ST

MC GAW AVE

MOSHER DR

BELL AVE

MCGAW AVE

CARNEGIE AVE

EASTMAN

DERIAN AVE

KETTERING

LANGLEY AVE

KAISER AVE

RED HILL AVE

WARNER AVE

DYER RD

VALENCIA AVE

ALTON AVE
G
R
A
N
D
AVE

JAMBOREE RD
NEWPO
RT
AV

MAIN ST

ALTON PKWY
S
TA
N
D
A
R
D
AVE

MACARTHUR BLVD

BARRANCA PKWY

VON KARMAN AVE
GC-1.5
DC-2
FLEX-3
FLEX-3
FLEX-3
GC
55 Figure LU-18 LAND USE MAP
55 FREEWAY AND DYER ROAD
Table LU-7. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
55 FREEWAY AND DYER ROAD
Designation
Maximum
General Character
Intensity Height
DC-2 District Center
-Medium

2.0 FAR or
90 du/ac 6 stories
High density urban villages consisting of
visually stunning and vibrant buildings
and spaces with a wide range and mix of
residential, live-work, commercial, hotel, and
employment-generating uses.

FLEX-3 Industrial/Flex
-Medium 3.0 FAR 10 stories
Office/industrial flex spaces, R&D, clean
manufacturing, corporate headquarters and
campuses. Live-work units are not permitted.

GC-1.5
General
Commercial
-Medium High

1.5 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, service commercial.

General
Commercial 0.5 FAR 35 feet Shopping, restaurants, entertainment, service commercial.

Note: The focus area also includes a nominal amount of land used by railroad operations and mapped with the Open Space land use designation.

See Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, for additional notes.

GC
LU
56 City Council 26 – 253 2/15/2022
1 Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text February 15, 2022
The following represents revisions and corrections to be incorporated into the December 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with text edits and additions displayed with tracked changes. A summary table is also provided to detail revisions to the timeframe for completion of the Implementation Actions due to the delay in the adoption in the General Plan Update.

Note, the prior Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan dated November 1, 2021, November 8, 2021, and November 29, 2021 have already been incorporated into the document.

INTRODUCTION
The following definitions to be added:

1. Environmental Justice Area. A disadvantage community as defined by Government Code Section 65302(h)(4)(A), as amended from time to time, i.e. a low-income area that is disproportionately affected by environmental pollution and other hazards that can lead to negative health effects, exposure, or environmental degradation, or an area identified by the California Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to Section 39711 pf the Health and Safety Code, as amended from time to time.

OPEN SPACE ELEMENT

2. General Plan Policies, Page OS-15
Paragraph three (3) to be revised as follows:

Goal OS-1, for example, is supported not only by the policies listed in this element (OS-1.1 through OS3.86), but also by six goals and policies in the Community Element, five goals and policies in the Public Service Element, four policies in the Land Use Element, and four policies in the Urban Design Element.

3. Table OS-2, Related General Plan Policies, Page OS-15 Goal OS-1 to be corrected as follows:

OS-1: Parks, Open Space, and Recreation. Provide an integrated system of accessible parks, recreation facilities, trails, and open space to serve the City of Santa Ana safe, accessible, sustainable, and diverse park and facility system with recreational opportunities accessible to all residents.

MOBILITY ELEMENT

4. Table M-1, Street Classifications. Page M-07.

Add text to identify the typical sidewalk for the Street Classifications, as follows: Principal Arterial: 10 feet, Major Arterial: 10 feet, Primary Arterial: 10 feet, Secondary Arterial 8 feet, Divided Collector Arterial:
8 feet, and Collector Street: 10 feet.

City Council 26 – 254 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan February 15, 2021 2 LAND USE ELEMENT

5. Figure LU-13, Artist Rendering, Page LU-43. Rendering to be revised to blur out vehicle license plates.

6. Appendix A, Table LU-A-1 Interim Development Standards, Page LU 74. Insert the following text below the Table title.

Table LU-9. Notes for All Focus Area Designations, Page LU 68. Insert the following text as the second to the last sentence in note # 5.

The Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 41-668 regarding Development Project Plan Approval and applications required pursuant to SB 330, as amended from time to time, apply to development projects applying the Interim Development Standards.

7. The following adjustments to the Agency and Target Dates for completion of General Plan Implementation Actions:

Element
Implementation
Action No.

Implementation Action
Topic Agency Page
Prior Target
Date
New Target
Date
Community CM 1.1 Recreation & cultural programs PRCSA/PBA CM 14 2022 2023 Community CM 1.3 Collaboration PBA/PRSCA CN 14 2022 2022-2024 Community CM 1.7 Rental property outreach PBA CM 15 2022 2022 & ongoing Community CM 3.4 Prevention activities PBA/CMO CM 15 2022 2022-2024 Community CM 3.5 Environmental education PBA/CMO CM 15 2021 2022-2024 Community CM 3.8 Environ. soil screening measures PBA CM 15 2022 2023 Conservation CN 1.2 Community identification PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.3 Proactive engagement PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.4 Health risk criteria PBA CN 19 2022 2022-2027 Conservation CN 1.5 Agency permits PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.6 Emission monitoring PBA CN 19 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 1.7 Truck idling PBA/PD CN 19 2023 2022-2024 Conservation CN 1.10 Interagency team PBA CN 20 2022 2022 & ongoing Conservation CN 2.4 Preservation resources PBA CN 21 2022 2023 Conservation CN 3.1 CALGreen voluntary measures PBA CN 21 2022 2023 Conservation CN 3.2 LEED/ENVISION certification PBA/PWA CN 21 2022 Conservation CN 3.3 Green design guidelines PBA CN 21 2022 2023 Conservation CN 3.5 Funding Energy Projects PBA/CDA CN 21 2023 2023 & ongoing Economic Prosperity EP 1.9 Retail Attraction CDA EP 15 2022 2023 Historic Preservation HP 1.1 Development standards update PBA HP 12 2025 2022-2027 Historic Preservation HP 1.3 Mills Act PBA HP 12 2022 2023 Historic Preservation HP 1.4 Design Guidelines update PBA HP 12 2024 2022-2027 Land Use LU 1.1 Development Code Update PBA LU 69 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 1.2 Community benefit PBA/CDA LU 69 2022 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.1 Periodic evaluation PBA LU 70 2025 2027 Land Use LU 2.3 Projections PBA LU 70 2021 & ongoing 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.5 Developer outreach PBA/CDA LU 70 2022 2023 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.7 Fiscal impact model PBA/CDA LU 70 2021 2022 City Council 26 – 255 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan February 15, 2021 3 Element
Implementation
Action No.

Implementation Action
Topic Agency Page
Prior Target
Date
New Target
Date
Land Use LU 2.9 High-density housing PBA LU 70 2021 2024 Land Use LU 2.10 Open space requirements PBA/PRSCA LU 70 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 2.11 Displacement strategies PBA LU 70 2022 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 2.12 Distinctive Districts PBA LU 70 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.2 Design guidelines and standards PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.6 Lead paint abatement CDA/PBA LU 71 2021 2021 & ongoing Land Use LU 3.7 Building massing PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.8 Signage PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027
Land Use LU 3.10 Code enforcement PBA LU 71 2022 Ongoing Land Use LU 3.11 Neighborhood aesthetics PBA LU 71 2022 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 3.12 Adaptive reuse PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.15 Communication tools PBA LU 71 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 3.16 Health in corridors PBA LU 72 Ongoing 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.18 Renovations & lead prevention PBA LU 72 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 3.19 Promote health PBA LU 72 2022 2022-ongoing Land Use LU 3.21 Prevention education PBA LU 72 2022 2022-ongoing Land Use LU 3.22 Public health outcomes PBA LU 72 2021 & ongoing Ongoing Land Use LU 3.24 Public health PBA LU 72 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 3.26 Health conditions PBA LU 72 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 3.27 Groundwater practice PBA LU 72 2022 - annually Ongoing Land Use LU 3.28 Tenant Protections PBA LU 73 2022- annually 2022 & ongoing Land Use LU 4.1 Complete communities PBA LU 73 2023 2024 Land Use LU 4.3 Public Improvements in nodes PBW/PWA LU 73 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 4.4 Public/private open space PBA/PWA/PRSCA LU 73 2022 2022-2027 Land Use LU 4.6 Fireworks & environment PBA/CMO/PD LU 73 2022 2022-2024 Land Use LU 4.8 Mixed Use Lifestyles PBA LU 73 2022 2022-2027 Mobility M 2.5 Grade separation PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 2.6 Regional transit planning PWA/PBA/CDA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 2.7 Wayfinding program PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 3.1 Active transportation planning PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 3.4 Pedestrian opportunity zones PWA/PBA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 3.6 Drinking water access PWA M 22 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 4.1 Municipal code update PBA M 22 2022 2017 Mobility M 4.5 Citywide Design Guidelines PBA/PWA M 22 2023 2022-2027 Mobility M 4.7 Bike parking and amenities PBA M 22 2022 2022-2027 Mobility M 5.5 Tree preservation PWA M 23 2021-2035 2022-2035 Mobility M 5.10 Street medians PWA M 23 2030 2022-2035
Mobility M 5.11 Underground utilities program PWA M 23 2021-2035 2022-2035 Noise N 1.3 Noise mitigation impacted areas PBA N 12 Ongoing 2022-2024 Noise N 1.5 Noise ordinance PBA/PD N12 2022 2022-2027
Noise N 2.7 Best practices PBA/PD N12 2023 2022-2024
Open Space OS 1.3 Annual open space summit PWA PRSCA OS 16 2022 2023 & ongoing City Council 26 – 256 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the December 2021 Draft General Plan February 15, 2021 4 Element
Implementation
Action No.

Implementation Action
Topic Agency Page
Prior Target
Date
New Target
Date
Open Space OS 1.5 Park opportunity fund PRSCA OS 16 2021 2022 & ongoing Open Space OS 1.7a Public parkland - residential PBA/PRSCA CN 17 2022 2022-2027 Open Space OS 1.11 Joint us agreements PRSCA OS 17 2022 2022 & ongoing Open Space OS 1.14 Community partnerships PRSCA OS 17 2021 & ongoing Ongoing Open Space OS 2.9 Hours of operation PRSCA OS 18 2021 2022 Open Space OS 2.10 Evaluate programming PRSCA OS 18 2021 2022 & annually Open Space OS 2.11 Program and facility fees PRSCA OS 18 2021 2022 & ongoing Public Services PS 2.12 Health Need Assessment PBA/CMO PS 18 2023 2022-2024 Public Services PS 3.13 Administrative streamlining PBA PS 18 2022 2023 Public Service PS 3.14 Technology upgrades PBA/Finance PS 18 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 1.1 Agency coordination PBA S 14 Annually Ongoing Safety S 1.10 Climate resiliency PBA/PWA S 14 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 2.1 Facility location PBA/ OCFD S 15 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 2.4 Lead contamination PBA/CDA S 15 2022 2022-ongoing Safety S 2.5 Business education PBA/CDA S 15 2022 2022-2024 Safety S 4.3 Development code standards PBA S 16 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 1.2 Design guidelines PBA UD 23 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 1.3 Signage PBA UD 23 2022 2022-2027
Urban Design UD 2.1 Emerging technology PBA/PWA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 2.2 Creative Expression PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 2.3 Billboards PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.2 Multimodal Transit Facilities PBA/PWA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.3 Bicycle parking PBA/CDA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.4 Cross-access PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.7 Streetscape Improvements PWA/PBA UD 24 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 3.8 Maintenance district PWA/PBA UD 24 2023 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 4.3 Allowable uses PBA UD 25 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 5.1 Landscaping focus intersections PBA UD 25 2022 2022-2027 Urban Design UD 5.3 Placemaking elements PWA/PBA UD 25 2024 2022-2027 City Council 26 – 257 2/15/2022
1 Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan
Draft Policy Framework, Maps, Tables, Implementation, and Text November 29, 2021
The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan, in addition to the clarification of November 1 and November 8, 2021. The updated content is shown by element, with policy and implementation actions displayed with tracked changes. Updates to maps, tables, time frames, and other edits are either described, shown with tracked changes, or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes.

City Council 26 – 258 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 2 Table LU-6, Land Use Designations, West Santa Ana Boulevard, page LU-49 - Remove the “GC-1.5” reference and replace with standard “GC” reference (0.5 FAR and 35 feet maximum height) and GC-1 for the block of GC northwest of First Street and Townsend (also 35 feet maximum height).

Figure LU-18, Land Use Map, 55 Freeway and Dyer Road, page LU-56 - Add the “GC” label to the area east of the 55 freeway.

Figure LU-1, Page LU-12:
- Change land use designation on map for the Legacy Sunflower project to UN-50.

The 4th and Mortimer project in SD-84 designated UN-30 allows densities up to 50 du/ac. The Sunflower Legacy project in SD-94 designated UN-50 allows densities up to 63 units per acre.

City Council 26 – 259 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 29, 2021 3  Revise the following land use designations approved through prior general Plan amendments: Northeast block of Mountain View and First Street to match existing persuant GPA No. 2020-04. Hapham Project on Edinger Avenue GPA No. 2017-03; Sunflower Legacy Project GPA No. 2019-01; Westview Housing on 17th Street GPA No. 2020- 07.  The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with the existing land use designations (APN 003- 161-10, 144-551-52, 016-045-19, 398-441-06, 411-131-38). No land use changes are proposed for these sites.
 The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number (APN) have been corrected to correspond with existing right-of-ways and will not be assigned a land use designation (APNs: 411-131-11, 008-131-33, 430-222-18, 430-222-19, 430-222-15, 430-222-17, 430-222-20, 430-222-22, 430-222-23, 398-082-33, 398-221-22, 398-221-23, 430-222-10, & 430-222-11).
 The land use designations for the following properties identified by assessor parcel number have been revised to coincide with surrounding land uses or City park project (APNs: 396- 261-26, 396-261-38, 396-261-37, 396-261-38, 011-251-17, 011-251-18, 011-251-19, & 011- 251-20)

OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Figure OS-2, Page OS-09 Figure OS-2:
- Change the legend to read “Joint-use Park School“.

Table OS-3 Open Space Element Implementation, Page OS 16:

INTRODUCTION
- Add an Introduction section for the General Plan to provide a brief overview of the GP’s organization, a summary of the update process, and a glossary.

City Council 26 – 260 2/15/2022
Clarifications to the August 2021 Draft General Plan
Draft Policy Framework and Maps
November 8, 2021
The following represents minor revisions and corrections made to the August 2021 version of the Draft Santa Ana General Plan. The updated content is shown by element, with draft policy and implementation items displayed with tracked changed. Updates to maps, tables, time frames for implementation actions, and other text edits are either described or displayed as final content with a brief description of the nature of the changes.

MOBILITY ELEMENT
Figure M-2, Master Plan of Bikeways
- Revise to show the following:

1. Newhope Street (New Class II)
a. between McFadden Avenue to 1st Street
b. between Hazard Avenue to Westminster Avenue

2. McFadden Avenue between West City Limit to Harbor Boulevard (New Class II)

3. Fairview Street (New Class I)
1 City Council 26 – 261 2/15/2022
Clarification to the August 2021 Draft General Plan November 8, 2021 2 a. Between Civic Center Drive and Trask Avenue
b. Between Warner Avenue and Sunflower Avenue