Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Santa Ana City Council
December 20, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
December 20, 2022
Body
Santa Ana City Council
Pages
35
Original file
102.4 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santa-ana.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

3 1
0 2
opportunity to finish the damaged electrical system to the park, and opportunities to add additional landscape improvements.

To deliver these additional improvements, capitalize on the existing favorable pricing of the existing contract with iBuild Spectrum, Inc. (Project Nos. 21-7533, 21-7534, 21- 7535), staff recommends amending the Fiscal Year 2022-23 Capital Improvement Program by $100,000 – increasing the construction administration and inspection amount by $10,000 and project contingencies by $90,000 – for a new estimated project delivery cost of $1,740,000 (Exhibits 2-3).

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER- 2021-093 was filed for the project

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the requested amendment to the construction contract of $90,000 and additional contract administration, inspection and testing of $10,000 is available from the unspent prior year CDBG funds included in the Citywide carryover of unspent amounts form Fiscal Year 2021-22 to Fiscal Year 2022-23, approved by Council on September 20, 2022.

Funds are budgeted and available for expenditure as follows:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.

Description
Amount

ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST
2022-23 13518783-66200
(21-7533)
Community
Development
Block Grant
CDBG Programs,
Building
Improvements
$223,214
2022-23 13518783-66200
(21-7534)
Community
Development
Block Grant
CDBG Programs,
Building
Improvements
$510,786
2022-23 13518783-66200
(21-7535)
Community
Development
Block Grant
CDBG Programs,
Building
Improvements
$24,928
2022-23 18117013-66200
(21-7533)
American
Rescue Plan Act

ARPA-PRCSA,
Building
Improvements
$303,572
2022-23 18117013-66200
(21-7535)
American
Rescue Plan Act

ARPA-PRCSA,
Building
Improvements
$577,500

City Council
19 –
2 12/20/2022

Amend Construction Contract with iBuild Spectrum, Inc.

December 20, 2022

Page 3 ends

3 1
0 2
Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.

Description
Amount
Total $1,640,000
Prior Year Unspent Funds Carried Forward
2022-23
13518783-66200
(21-7535, 21-
7533, 21-7534)
Community
Development
Block Grant
CDBG Programs,
Building
Improvements
$100,000
Total $1,740,000
All funds are scheduled for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2022-23. However, any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into FY 2023- 24 for expenditure.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map

2. Revised Cost Analysis

3. Amendment to Fiscal Year 2022-23 CIP
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager

City Council
19 –
3 12/20/2022

PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 21-7533:

Campesino Park Restroom
Exhibit 1

City Council
19 –
4 12/20/2022

PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 21-7534:

Memorial Park
Restroom
Exhibit 1

City Council
19 –
5 12/20/2022

PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 21-7535:

Madison Park
Restroom
Exhibit 1

City Council
19 –
6 12/20/2022

EXHIBIT 2

ORIGINAL
AMOUNT

ADDITIONAL

FUNDING

NEW TOTAL
1,408,575.00$ 1,408,575.00 $
140,353.00$ 90,000.00 $ 230,353.00 $
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1,640,000.00$ 100,000.00 $ 1,740,000.00 $

EXPENDITURE

CATEGORY
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 21-7533, 21-7534, 21-7535: CAMPESINO PARK, MEMORIAL

PARK, MADISON PARK RESTROOMS

COST ANALYSIS
Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing
Contingencies
Construction Contract
91,072.00$ 10,000.00 $ 101,072.00 $

City Council
19 –
7 12/20/2022

CITY OF SANTA ANA FY
22/23
CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Project scope includes demolishing the existing restroom building, installing a new pre-fabricated restroom building and site improvements to provide an accessible path of travel to these facilities.

PROJECT NEED:

The restroom at Madison Park is one of three restrooms that has been identified as a target for vandalism and would require major efforts to maintain due to old age and existing conditions.

PROJECT TITLE:

Madison Pre-Fab Restroom
PROJECT CATEGORY:

City & Park Facility Improvements
Park Facility

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY:

DIVISION:

CONTACT:

DATE:

Public Works
CIP Engineering
Gilbert Castillo, Senior Engineer
04-Nov-2022

PROJECT COSTS
FY 22/23
FY 23/24
FY 24/25
FY 25/26
FY 26/27
FY 27/28
FY 28/29
Construction
100,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
100,000
-
-
-
-
-
-

SOURCE OF FUNDS
FY 22/23
FY 23/24
FY 24/25
FY 25/26
FY 26/27
FY 27/28
FY 28/29
CDBG Programs
100,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
100,000
-
-
-
-
-
-

City Council
19 –
8 12/20/2022

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 20
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
December 20, 2022
TOPIC: Purchase of Three Hyundai Forklifts for Public Works Agency Central Stores

AGENDA TITLE
Award a Purchase Order to Select Equipment Sales in the Amount of $145,953 for Three Hyundai Hydraulic Forklifts for Public Works Agency Store & Property Control (Specification No. 22-158) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize a one-time purchase and payment of purchase order to Select Equipment Sales for the purchase of three Hyundai Hydraulic Forklifts, in the amount of $135,953, plus a contingency of $10,000, for a total amount not to exceed $145,953, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Fleet Services Division is responsible for the acquisition, maintenance, repair, and replacement of vehicles and maintenance equipment. The Public Works Agency Stores & Property Control (Central Stores) is responsible for procurement, shipping, receiving, and warehousing of equipment and supplies for internal City customers.

Central Stores is in need of three new forklifts to replace aging equipment that have exceeded their useful life according to the Fleet Services Division’s recommended Equipment Lifecycle Guidelines. Replacing the forklifts with more reliable and efficient models is essential to ensure that Central Stores can continue to meet the needs of its internal City customers.

Santa Ana Ordinance No. NS-2312 authorizes the City to utilize purchase contracts for any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. Sourcewell (formerly National Joint Powers Alliance) awarded a contract to Select Equipment Sales, a Santa Ana vendor, (Contract No. 091520-HCE) for procurement of equipment as a result of open competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which includes government agencies.

Utilizing the contract awarded to Select Equipment Sales for the purchase of the three forklifts is in accordance with the City’s existing Purchasing Guidelines.

City Council
20 –
1 12/20/2022

Purchase of Three Hyundai Forklifts
December 20, 2022

Page 2 ends

3 1
1 9

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are budgeted and made available in the following account for the specified year.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit-
Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
2022-23 01117017-66400 General Fund
PWA-Service
Enhancement,
Machinery & Equipment
$145,953
Submitted By:

Nabil Saba, Executive Dir Public Works
Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager

City Council
20 –
2 12/20/2022

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 21
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
December 20, 2022
TOPIC: Amend Agreement and Exercise First Renewal Option for Park Tree Maintenance Services

AGENDA TITLE
Amend the Agreement with West Coast Arborists, Inc., for Tree Maintenance Services, Increasing the Annual Amount by $280,000 for the Remaining Term of the Agreement and Exercise First Renewal Option (General and Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an amendment to the agreement with West Coast Arborists, Inc. (WCA), for tree maintenance services, increasing the annual amount by $280,000, for a total amount not to exceed $2,444,100 with six one-year renewal options exercisable by the City Manager, for a total agreement amount not to exceed $18,050,750, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency is responsible for the maintenance of approximately 50,000 parkway and street median trees and 7,000 City park trees with the primary goal of preserving the integrity and health of the Santa Ana Urban Forest. Performing proper and timely tree trimming extends the life cycle of the urban forest by decreasing the likelihood of limb failures and preventing safety hazards to the public and reducing the City’s liability.

Public Works’ Parks, Fleet and Facilities Division oversee the maintenance of City- owned trees on all City parks. Staff recommend increasing the budget by $280,000 annually for parks tree services maintenance services on an as-needed basis. The additional funds will be utilized for routine grid trimming cycle, prune additional trees, and provide the flexibility of using WCA staff to assist with emergency response efforts during and after windstorm events.

On November 17, 2020, the City entered into an agreement with WCA, the current tree maintenance provider, in the amount of $3,028,650 for the first 18 months and $2,109,100 annually to exercise any of the six one-year renewal options (Exhibit 1).

WCA has served the community's urban forest needs by pruning approximately 15,000 trees a year. They have also implemented an inventory system utilizing Global

City Council
21 –
1 12/20/2022

Amend Agreement for Tree Maintenance Services
December 20, 2022

Page 2 ends

3 1
2 0
Positioning System (GPS) technology for all City street trees and prepared an inventory for the City's use. This GPS inventory has led to more efficient tree inspections and pruning, improved accuracy in record-keeping, and timely production of information relevant to service requests and liability claim investigations.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with the action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the amended agreement is budgeted and available in the Fiscal Year 2022- 23 Council-approved budget and will be budgeted in future years through following accounts:

Accounting
Unit
Account
Number
Accounting Unit
Account
Description
Fund
Description
FY
2022-23
(Current)
FY
2022-23
(Amendment
)
FY
2022-23
(Total)
01117643
62300
Public Works
Street Trees
General
Fund $1,599,100 - $1,599,100
02917635
62300
Public Works
Median
Landscaping
Special Gas
Tax Fund $200,000 - $200,000
01117651
62320
Parks
Maintenance
General
Fund $250,000 $250,000 $500,000
07417655
62320
Parks
Civic Center
General
Fund $30,000 $30,000 $60,000
01113220
62300
Parks
Zoo
General
Fund $30,000 - $30,000
06717650
62320
Public Works
SARTC
Operations
Enterprise
Fund $25,000 - $25,000
02718133
62300
CDA
Downtown
Enhancements
Enterprise
Fund $5,000 - $5,000
06017640
62300
Water Utility
Production &
Supply
Water $12,500 - $12,500
08517138
62300
City Yard
Operations City Yard $12,500 - $12,500
Total $2,164,100 $280,000 $2,444,100

City Council
21 –
2 12/20/2022

Amend Agreement for Tree Maintenance Services
December 20, 2022

Page 3 ends

3 1
2 0
Accounting
Unit
Account
Number
Accounting
Unit
Account
Description
Fund
Description
FY
2023-24
FY
2024-25
FY
2025-26
01117643
62300
Public Works
Street Trees
General
Fund $1,599,100 $1,599,100 $1,599,100
02917635
62300
Public Works
Median
Landscaping
Special Gas
Tax Fund $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
01117651
62320
Parks
Maintenance
General
Fund $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
07417655
62320
Parks
Civic Center
General
Fund $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
01113220
62300
Parks
Zoo
General
Fund $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
06717650
62320
Public Works
SARTC
Operations
Enterprise
Fund $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
02718133
62300
CDA
Downtown
Enhancements
Enterprise
Fund $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
06017640
62300
Water Utility
Production &
Supply
Water $12,500 $12,500 $12,500
08517138
62300
City Yard
Operations City Yard $12,500 $12,500 $12,500
Total $2,444,100 $2,444,100 $2,444,100
Accounting
Unit
Account
Number
Accounting
Unit
Account
Description
Fund
Description
FY
2026-27
FY
2027-28
FY
2028-29
(6 Months)
01117643
62300
Public Works
Street Trees
General
Fund $1,599,100 $1,599,100 $799,550
02917635
62320
Public Works
Median
Landscaping
Special Gas
Tax Fund $200,000 $200,000 $100,000
01117651
62320
Parks
Maintenance
General
Fund $500,000 $500,000 $250,000
07417655
62320
Parks
Civic Center
General
Fund $60,000 $60,000 $30,000
01113220
62300
Parks
Zoo
General
Fund $30,000 $30,000 $15,000

City Council
21 –
3 12/20/2022

Amend Agreement for Tree Maintenance Services
December 20, 2022

Page 4 ends

3 1
2 0
Accounting
Unit
Account
Number
Accounting
Unit
Account
Description
Fund
Description
FY
2026-27
FY
2027-28
FY
2028-29
(6 Months)
06717650
62320
Public Works
SARTC
Operations
Enterprise
Fund $25,000 $25,000 $12,500
02718133
62300
CDA
Downtown
Enhancements
Enterprise
Fund $5,000 $5,000 $2,500
06017640
62300
Water Utility
Production &
Supply
Water $12,500 $12,500 $6,250
08517138
62300
City Yard
Operations City Yard $12,500 $12,500 $6,250
Total $2,444,100 $2,444,100 $1,222,050
GRAND TOTAL AMOUNT – NOT TO
EXCEED
(Including $2,164,100 from FY 21-22)
$18,050,750

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Second Amendment with West Coast Arborists, Inc.

Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager

City Council
21 –
4 12/20/2022

Page 1 ends

f 2

SECOND AMENDMENT TO SERVICES

AGREEMENT
WITH WEST COAST ARBORIST, INC.

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this 20th day of December 2022, by and between West Coast Arborist, Inc. (“Co nsult ant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal
corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California
(“City”).

RECITALS
A. On No
vember 17, 2020, the City entered into Agreement #A-2020-228 with Consultant to provide tree maintenance services.

B. On
March 15, 2022, the parties entered into a Second Amendment to increase the annual compensation by $145,000.

C. In ac
cordance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to further increase the annual compensation for additional services such as routine grid trimming cycle, prune additional trees, and to assist with emergency response efforts during and after windstorm events on an as-needed basis for the remainder of the term including any extension periods.

THE PA
RTIES THEREFORE AGREE:

1. Sec
tion 2, COMPENSATION, shall be amended to increase compensation as follows:

The total amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $18,050,750 during the term of this agreement, including any extension periods exercised under Section 3. The annual sum shall be increased by $280,000 for a total amount not to exceed $2,444,100 annually.

Except as hereinabove modified, the terms and conditions of said Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment to the Agreement the date and year first above written.

ATTEST
: CITY OF SANTA ANA
_________
__________________ ________________________
Kristine Ridge
Clerk of the Council City Manager
[Si
gnatures continued on the following page]
EXIHIBIT 1

City Council
21 –
5 12/20/2022

P
age 2 of 2
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
____
_________________________
By: Jose Montoya
Assistant City Attorney
R
ECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: CONSULTANT
__________________________
_______________________________
Nabil Saba, P.E. By: Patrick Mahoney
Executive Director of Title: President
Public Works Agency

City Council
21 –
6 12/20/2022

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/departments/public-works/
Item # 22
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
December 20, 2022
TOPIC: Amend Agreement for Hardscape Pavement Cleaning and Infectious Waste Removal
AGENDA TITLE:

Amend the Agreement with Superior Property Services, Inc. To Increase The Total Agreement Amount by $700,000 (Project No. 22-1402) Not to Exceed $1,966,568 for Hardscape Pavement Cleaning and Infectious Waste Removal Services for the Remaining Term of the Agreement (General Fund) (Revive Santa Ana Program)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment to the agreement with Superior Property Services, Inc. to increase the total compensation amount by $700,000 for a total agreement amount not to exceed $1,966,568, for the remainder of the agreement term expiring June 30, 2026, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Parks, Fleet, and Facilities Division maintains the Santa Ana Civic Center as part of the Civic Center Joints Power Authority with the County of Orange.

On January 24, 2022, Parks, Recreation and Community Services issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for hardscape pavement cleaning and infectious waste removal services.

As a result, on May 17, 2022, Superior Property Services, Inc. was awarded an agreement from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2026.

On August 2, 2022, the City Council approved the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan that reflected the entire American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocation of local fiscal recovery funds. A $700,000 in cost savings was subsequently identified and redirected, by the City Manager’s authorization, to the COVID-19 Sanitization project. Staff is finding an increasing need for cleaning and sanitization at high-traffic pedestrian and bicyclist areas throughout the City. Due to the prompt and excellent services already provided by Superior Property Services, Inc., staff would like to increase current services to enhance public health and safety.

City Council
22 –
1 12/20/2022

Amend Agreement for Hardscape Pavement Cleaning and Infectious Waste Removal December 20, 2022

Page 2 ends

3 1
2 7
Staff recommends increasing the current agreement with Superior Property Services, Inc. by an amount of $700,000, for a revised total agreement amount not to exceed $1,966,568 for the remainder of the agreement term (Exhibit 1).

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Additional $700,000 ARPA funds are available for expenditure in the current Fiscal Year 2022-23 through Fiscal Year 2025-26. Any unspent ARPA funds allocated for this expenditure will be carryforward until funds are exhausted through the term of the agreement.

Additional funds:

Fiscal Year Accounting
Unit –
Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit -
Account No.

Description
Total
FY 2022-23
through
FY 2025-26
18117013-
66200
(22-1402)
American
Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA)
ARPA – PWA
Buildings & Building
Improvements
$700,000
Prior Approval:
2022-23
(July-June)
07417655-
62320
Civic Center
Maintenance
Civic Center
Maintenance-
Maintenance &
Repair Buildings &
Grounds
$316,642
2023-24
(July-June)
07417655-
62320
Civic Center
Maintenance
Civic Center
Maintenance-
Maintenance &
Repair Buildings &
Grounds
$316,642
2024-25
(July-June)
07417655-
62320
Civic Center
Maintenance
Civic Center
Maintenance-
Maintenance &
Repair Buildings &
Grounds
$316,642
2025-26
(July-June)
07417655-
62320
Civic Center
Maintenance
Civic Center
Maintenance-
Maintenance &
Repair Buildings &
Grounds
$316,642
Total $1,966,568

City Council
22 –
2 12/20/2022

Amend Agreement for Hardscape Pavement Cleaning and Infectious Waste Removal December 20, 2022

Page 3 ends

3 1
2 7

EXHIBIT(S)

1. First Amendment to the Agreement with Superior Property Services, Inc.

Submitted By: Nabil Saba, Executive Director of Public Works Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager

City Council
22 –
3 12/20/2022

EXHIBIT 1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH SUPERIOR PROPERTY SERVICES.

INC. TO PROVIDE HARDSCAPE PAVEMENT CLEANING AND INFECTIOUS

WASTE REMOVAL SERVICES IN THE CIVIC CENTER
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is entered into this 20th day of December 2022, by and between Superior Properties Services, Inc. ("Consultant"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City").

RECITALS
A. On May 17, 2022, the parties entered into Agreement No. A-2022-076 ("Agreement") to conduct hardscape pavement cleaning and infectious waste removal services in the Civic Center.

B. The parties wish to amend the Agreement to increase the compensation, expand the services citywide and to indicate that the additional amounts to be expended are using funds provided by the American Rescue Plan Act ("ARP A").

The Parties therefore agree:

I. Recitals are hereby amended to add the following:

A. ARPA was signed into law in March 2021. ARPA authorizes the United States Department of Treasury to provide funding for a number of different programs, in
cluding the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund ("SLFRF"), to provide monetary support to local governments to respond to, mitigate, and recover from the COVID-19 public health emergency.

B. On July 20, 2021, the Santa Ana City Council authorized the City Manager to utilize ARP A SLFRF funding from the United State Department of Treasury for the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan, which includes five spending categories:
recovery from the pandemic, direct assistance programs, public health and safety, critical infrastructure, and city fiscal hea lth.

C. The primary purpose of the Agreement is to provide consulting services related to public health and lessening the spread of COVID-19.

D. The Grant Program is specifically listed as an enumerated eligible use of SLFRF payments under expenditure category 1.4 of the Department of the Treasury Final Rule for the Act, Public Health: Prevention in Congregate Settings.

II. Section 2, Compensation, shall be amended to increase the compensation by utilizing $700,000 from ARPA/REVIVE Santa Ana funds. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement, including any extension periods, shall not exceed $1,966,568.

Page 1 ends

City Council
22 –
4 12/20/2022

City Council
22 –
5 12/20/2022

City Council
22 –
6 12/20/2022

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 23
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
December 20, 2022
TOPIC: Fuel Delivery and Supply Services

AGENDA TITLE
Approve an Agreement with AAA Oil, Inc. for Fuel Delivery and Supply Services (Non- General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with AAA Oil, Inc. for fuel delivery and supply services in an annual amount not to exceed $1,300,000 and total amount not to exceed $6,500,000, for a three-year term beginning December 20, 2022 and expiring December 19, 2025, with an option for one two-year extension, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Central Stores is responsible for purchasing and dispensing fuel at the fueling stations located at the City’s Corporate Yard and Santa Ana Police Department. The City currently has a fleet inventory of over 600 vehicles across all City departments that rely on these fueling stations to meet their unleaded and diesel fueling needs. Additionally, the City also utilizes diesel fuel to power emergency backup generators at several of its critical infrastructure sites. The current agreement for fuel delivery and supply is set to expire on January 31, 2023.

On September 13, 2022, the Public Works Agency issued Request for Proposal (RFP) 22-110 for gasoline and diesel fuel supply and delivery services. The RFP was advertised on the City’s online bid management and publication system with bids due on October 7, 2022. System records indicate 18 vendors were notified and 18 vendors downloaded proposal files. Five proposals were received and evaluated by a selection committee.

Based on the criteria outlined in the RFP, all proposals received were categorized as responsive, and their respective scores are as follows:

City Council
23 –
1 12/20/2022

Fuel Delivery and Supply Services
December 20, 2022

Page 2 ends

3 1
3 1

FIRM LOCATION PROPOSAL SCORE
AAA Oil, Inc. Garden Grove 85
Pinnacle Petroleum, Inc. Huntington Beach 79
Merrimac Energy Group Long Beach 79
Downs Energy Corona 69
Southern Counties Oil Co Orange 65
In accordance with the proposal scores, staff recommends entering into an agreement with AAA Oil, Inc. for gasoline and diesel fuel supply and delivery services (Exhibit 1).

The proposal demonstrated high levels of technical competency and experience to complete the scope of work, and contained a clear path toward achieving City goals and objectives.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for this action is budgeted and available for expenditure in the current fiscal year and will be budgeted in future fiscal years as shown below.

Fiscal Year
Accounting
Unit- Account
No.

Fund
Description
Accounting Unit
– Account No.

Description
Amount
2022-23
(Dec-June) 07617102-63300 Stores &
Property Control
Stores & Property
Control, Gas &
Diesel
$250,000
2023-24
(July-June) 07617102-63300 Stores &
Property Control
Stores & Property
Control, Gas &
Diesel
$1,400,000
2024-25
(July-June) 07617102-63300 Stores &
Property Control
Stores & Property
Control, Gas &
Diesel
$1,400,000
2025-26
(July-Dec) 07617102-63300 Stores &
Property Control
Stores & Property
Control, Gas &
Diesel
$700,000
Renewal Option Years
2025-26
(Dec-June) 07617102-63300 Stores &
Property Control
Stores & Property
Control, Gas &
Diesel
$700,000
2026-27
(July-June) 07617102-63300 Stores &
Property Control
Stores & Property
Control, Gas &
Diesel
$1,400,000

City Council
23 –
2 12/20/2022

Fuel Delivery and Supply Services
December 20, 2022

Page 3 ends

3 1
3 1
2027-28
(July-Dec) 07617102-63300 Stores &
Property Control
Stores & Property
Control, Gas &
Diesel
$650,000
Total: $6,500,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Agreement with AAA Oil, Inc.

Submitted By: Nabil Saba, Executive Director, Public Works Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager

City Council
23 –
3 12/20/2022

1 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND
AAA OIL, INC.TO PROVIDE GASOLINE AND DIESEL SUPPLY AND DELIVERY TH
IS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 20th day of December 2022 by and between AAA Oil, Inc. (“Contractor”), and the City of Santa Ana , a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

R

ECITALS
A. T
he City desires to retain a Contractor having special skill and expertise to supply the City’s annual gasoline and diesel fuel needs.

B. O
n September 13, 2022, the City issued Request for Proposal (“RFP”) No. 22-110, by which it sought Contractors to provide gasoline and diesel fuel delivery and supply services to the City.

C. C
ontractor submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City. Contractor represents that Contractor is a wholesale distributor of diesel, gasoline, L NG/natural gas, and other petroleum products and is able and willing to provide such services to the City.

D. I
n undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Contractor represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Contractor under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional contracting firm in the field.

N
OW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. S

COPE OF SERVICES
O
n an as -needed basis, Contractor shall perform the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services – Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by reference and (“RFP”) No. 22-110 – Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.

2. CO

MPENSATION
a. C
ity neither warrants nor guarantees any m inimum or maximum compensation to Contractor under t his Agreement. Contractor shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit C. The total annual sum to be expended under the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $1,300,000 during each year of the Agreement. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement for the entire term shall not exceed $6,500,000.
b. P
ayment by City shall be made within forty -five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
4 12/20/2022

2 Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City.

3. TERM

This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on December 19 , 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 1 7, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for one (1) two (2) year period upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney.

4. PREVAILING WAGES

Contractor is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the services being performed are part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.

Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failu re or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

Contractor shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Contractor performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Contractor shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Contractor shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social sec urity taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.

6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS

This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Contractor shall require all sub contractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non- exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk.

City Council
23 –
5 12/20/2022

3 7. INSURANCE
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the Contractor , his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired (Code 8) and non-owned (Code 9) autos, with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

4. Contractors Pollution Liability and/or Errors & Omissions applicable to the work being performed, with a limit no less than $2,000,000 per claim or occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate per policy period of one year. If the contractor maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

Self-Insured Retentions
Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Contractor or Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.

Other Insurance Provisions

A. The General Liability, Automobile Liability, Contractors Pollution Liability, and/or Asbestos Pollution policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:

City Council
23 –
6 12/20/2022

4 1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).

2. For any claims related to this project, the Contractor’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

B. The Automobile Liability policy shall be endorsed to include Transportation Pollution Liability insurance, covering materials to be transported by Contractor pursuant to the contract. This coverage may also be provided on the Contractors Pollution Liability policy.

C. If General Liability, Contractors Pollution Liability and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/or Errors & Omissions coverages are written on a claims-made form:

1. The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made

4. policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.

5. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.

6. If the services involve lead-based paint or asbestos identification / remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability shall not contain lead-based paint or asbestos exclusions. If the services involve mold identification / remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability shall not contain a mold exclusion and the definition of “Pollution” shall include microbial matter including mold.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M.

Best rating of no less than A:VII if admitted in the State of California.

Verification of Coverage
Contractor shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Contractor’s obligation to provide them. The City reserves the right

City Council
23 –
7 12/20/2022

5 to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of subrogation which any insurer may acquire against City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss.

Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.

Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage subcontractors shall provide coverage with a format least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.

Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

8. INDEMNIFICATION

Contractor agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects a rising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this S ection or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor.

City Council
23 –
8 12/20/2022

6 9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION

Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney’s fees, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Contractor to the City pursuant to this Agreement.

10. RECORDS

Contractor shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable.

Contractor shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours.

Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payme nt to Contractor under this Agreement.

11. CONFIDENTIALITY

If Contractor receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Contractor agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclos ed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non -use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Contractor disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Contractor without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Contractor without reference to information disclosed by the City.

12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE

Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement.

13. NOTICE

Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by fi rst class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided

City Council
23 –
9 12/20/2022

7 in this Section, to the following persons:

To City: Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988

Executive Director
Public Works Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702

To Contractor: AAA Oil, Inc.
11621 Westminster Avenue
Garden Grove CA 92843
Attn: Jennifer Crawley
Marketing Manager and Contracts Administrator

A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For pur poses of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.

14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT

This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor regarding the subject matter herein, and su persedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor . The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Contractor or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein.

City Council
23 –
10 12/20/2022

8 15. ASSIGNMENT

Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor , Contractor may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City’s prior written consent shall be considered null and void. N othing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Contractors retained by City.

16. WAIVER

No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.

17. TERMINATION

This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination.

In such event, Contractor shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Contractor compensation for all services performed by Contractor prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions:

a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Contractor to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Contractor consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.

18. NON-DISCRIMINATION

Contractor shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, relation, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or in connection with any activities under this Agreement. Contractor affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.

19. JURISDICTION-VENUE

This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or pr oceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.

City Council
23 –
11 12/20/2022

9 20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES

Contractor shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemp tions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Contractor shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.

21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.

b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.

[Signatures on the following page]

City Council
23 –
12 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
13 12/20/2022

EXHIBIT A

City Council
23 –
14 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
15 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
16 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
17 12/20/2022

EXHIBIT B

City Council
23 –
18 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
19 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
20 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
21 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
22 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
23 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
24 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
25 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
26 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
27 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
28 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
29 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
30 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
31 12/20/2022

City Council
23 –
32 12/20/2022

Q# Question Response
1 What are the city's payment terms?  Does the city do early payment if offered a discount? Payment term is net forty‐five (45) d ays per Attachment 4 Section 3. Term 2 May a prospective bidder, only bid on certain line items?  For example, we do would not be able to bid on the Propane as we do not supply that in California.

The City has made this an optional item per Addendum One 3 On the gasoline and diesel pricing form, only the wet hose section states the price is based off of Los Angeles Ca OPIS Gross 10:am EST Daily Rack Average with Car. Would that be based for all products? Clarify if RD is to based on CARB #2? Yes, the gasoline and diesel pricing should be based off Los Angeles CA OPIS Gross 10:00 AM EST Daily Rack Average with Car+. This same index as Diesel ‐ Type 2 Clear shall be derived for the renewable clear diesel (RD99 and RD95) as well. 4 Do the emergency powered generators on page 15 take Red Dyed Diesel? Yes, emergency generators take red dyed diesel 5 If the emergency powered generators on page 15 take red dyed diesel, the red dyed diesel pricing on the Fee Proposal does include pricing for quantities in conjunction with the tank sizes listed for these generators.  Can an additional delivery size be added to the Fee Proposal for red dyed diesel to cover these?
Yes, please refer to Addendum One
6 Due to the National Driver Shortage, that standard turn for deliveries is now 2 days.  Would the City be willing to extend its turn time from 1 day to 2 days?
Yes, please refer to Addendum One
7 Are we required to bid all products and all services to be considered for award? No, please refer to Addendum One 8 Propane tank design, supply and installation is not a component of a Petroleum Fuel Distribution Company.  Was this service meant to be included in this solicitation?  Are we required to bid on this service to be considered for award? No, please refer to Addendum One
9 Is the OPS Index used to derive the base pricing the Los Angeles, Ca OPIS Gross 10:00am EST Daily Rack Average with CAR? Yes, p lease refer to Addendum One 10 For the RD95 and the RD99 pricing, there is not currently a ratable OPIS index compiling this pricing and it is now industry standard to use the OPIS ULSD #2 Index as the base price.  Can you confirm for RD95 and RD99 that you will be using the OPIS Los Angeles, Ca OPIS Gross 10:00am EST Daily Rack Average with CAR for ULSD#2 to derive the base price? Use the OPIS Los Angeles, Ca OPIS Gross 10:00am EST Daily Rack Average with CAR for ULSD#2 to derive the base price for RD95 and RD99 11 Because RD95 and RD99 pricing is not fixed and needs to be tied to OPIS, for RD95 and RD99 on the Fee Proposal, can you please mirror the pricing entries with the structure of the Clear Diesel Pricing and add both Delivery Size breakdowns categories (7000+ and 3500‐ Yes, please refer to Addendum One
12 Red Dyed ULSD#2 pricing is not fixed and needs to be tied to OPIS, so for Red Dyed ULSD#2 on the Fee Proposal, can you please mirror the pricing entries with the structure of the Clear Diesel Pricing? Yes, please refer to Addendum One
13 What is the average delivered quantity of unleaded fuel at the Corporate Yard? The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard  is 7,500 gallons for unleaded. 14 What is the average delivered quantity of diesel fuel at the Corporate Yard? The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard is  8,800 gallons for diesel. 15 What is the average delivered quantity of unleaded fuel at the Police Department? The average delivery size to the Police Depar tment is 8,800 gallons for unleaded. 16 Because the answers to vital questions will not be provided until shortly before the bid is due, there is a serious concern that there will not be enough time to do adequate analysis to prepare the bid by the due date.  Would the City please consider extending the bid due date at least another week for these reasons?
Yes, please refer to the addendum
17 May I please get a bid tabulation from the last award? Refer to PlanetBids for RFP 17‐108 Fuel ‐ Gasoline and Diesel https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/20137/bo/bo‐detail/41783 18 Who is the current incumbent? Please refer to PlanetBids for RFP 17‐108 Fuel ‐ Gasoline and Diesel hƩps://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/20137/bo/bo‐detail/41783 19 Are “fees” part of the evaluation criteria for this bid? Yes, refer to Section I. General under C. Proposal Evaluation and Rating 20 Are we required to submit an hourly rate on our “Fee Proposal” with this contract as we are supplying a commodity? Yes, refer t o Scope of Services Section K. Fee Schedule 21 When is the City planning on going to City Council for award approval? The anticipated project award date is Tuesday, November  15, 2022 per the RFP cover page 22 What is the annual volume for Dyed Diesel? Refer to Attachment 1: Scope of Services Section C 23 What is the annual volume for Clear Diesel? Refer to Attachment 1: Scope of Services Section C 24 Are the fuel tanks at the Corporate Yard above ground or below ground? The fuel tanks are below ground 25 Is the 6,000 gallon Dyed Diesel tank at the Santa Ana Police Department above ground or below ground? The 6,000 gallon tank spe cified is below ground 26 Do we need to own fleet of delivery vehicles? No
27 Can we use common carriers to make the fuel deliveries? Yes 28 .Instead of monthly invoicing, can we submit an invoice for payment aŌer every delivery? Yes 29 Do we have to bid on the Propane Tank Installation and fueling in order to be responsive on this bid? No, please refer to Adden dum One 30 Is the City currently using RD99? No, the City intends to use RD99 in the future 31 If we are the successful bidder can we mark a fuel surcharge as a line item on invoices? Yes 32 Is the City currently using RD95? No, the City intends to use RD95 in the future 33 Do any of the sites take split deliveries i.e. gasoline and diesel on the same truck delivered on the same day? Yes, upon reque st 34 What is the average delivery size for Unleaded to the Corporate Yard? The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard is 7,500  gallons for unleaded. 35 What is the average delivery size for diesel to the Corporate Yard? The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard is 8,800 ga llons for diesel. 36 What is the average delivery size for Unleaded to the Police Department? The average delivery size to the Police Department is  8,800 gallons for unleaded. 37 Is the City exempt from any taxes? No, the City notexempt from any taxes 38 What OPIS index would you like us to use for the bid line items i.e. OPIS Daily Average, OPIS Daily Contract Average, etc.? The  base price is Los Angeles CA OPIS GROSS 10:00 AM EST Daily Rack Average with Car+ 39 What OPIS benchmark City would you like bidders to use? The base price is Los Angeles CA OPIS GROSS 10:00 AM EST Daily Rack Average with Car+ 40 May I please have a copy of the most recent unleaded invoice for the Corporate Yard? The Water Division cannot release those re cords a this time 41 May I please have a copy of the most recent diesel invoice for the Corporate Yard? The Water Division cannot release those reco rds a this time 42 May I please have a copy of the most recent unleaded invoice for the Santa Ana Police Department? The Water Division cannot rel ease those records a this time 43 What OPIS index do you want us to use for RD99? Use the OPIS Los Angeles, Ca OPIS Gross 10:00am EST Daily Rack Average with CAR for ULSD#2 to derive the base price for RD95 and RD99 RFP 22‐110 Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services 9/29/2022
 
City Council
 23 – 33
12/20/2022
 

44 What OPIS index do you want us to use for RD95? Use the OPIS Los Angeles, Ca OPIS Gross 10:00am EST Daily Rack Average with CAR for ULSD#2 to derive the base price for RD95 and RD99 45 Do we have to bid on all line items to be responsive for this bid? No, please refer to Addendum One 46 What OPIS index would you like us to use for RD99? Use the OPIS Los Angeles, Ca OPIS Gross 10:00am EST Daily Rack Average with CAR for ULSD#2 to derive the base price for RD95 and RD99 47 What OPIS index would you like us to use for RD95? Use the OPIS Los Angeles, Ca OPIS Gross 10:00am EST Daily Rack Average with CAR for ULSD#2 to derive the base price for RD95 and RD99 48 Do the generator sites require Dyed Diesel fuel? Yes 49 Is the City planning on awarding the contract to multiple vendors? The City intends to reward the Contract to one Contractor 50 Will the City please consider extending the bid due date due to all of the clarifications requested? Yes, please refer to Adden dum One 51 What are the tank sizes for each of the propane vehicles? The propane requirements are as stated in the RFP 52 If the propane vehicles need to be wethosed will all vehicles be located at a central location?  If so what is that location? If not, please provide the location of each of the vehicles.

The vehicles will be located at the City Corporated Yard (220 S Daisy Ave, Santa Ana CA 92703) 53 Currently who is the incumbent? Please refer to PlanetBids for RFP 17‐108 Fuel ‐ Gasoline and Diesel https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/20137/bo/bo‐detail/41783 54 Currently who is the incumbent? Please refer to PlanetBids for RFP 17‐108 Fuel ‐ Gasoline and Diesel hƩps://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/20137/bo/bo‐detail/41783 55 Can you please supply a couple of your most current invoices for gasoline, and all grades of diesel fuels. The Water Division c annot release those records a this time 56 Can the city of Santa state the current percentage amount for local preference. There is no percentage amount 57 Can you please state how the local preference will be evaluated in the bidding process. The local preference is not a part of t he evaluation 58 Does the current vendor have a local preference on the current contract? The local preference is not a part of the evaluation 59 Can we bid on only the Unleaded (Transport) piece of the business and provide a "No Bid" on the Diesel (Bobtail) portion of the RFP? No, all Bidders must bid on all required items in the Fee Schedule 60 In the event of delivery of a transport load (> 7,000 gallons), we cannot meter the delivery. Will a Veeder Root ticket be available to print and provide as proof of delivery?
Yes
61 Is there a Veeder Root system available for the 20,000 gallon tanks for inventory purposes? Yes 62 If there is a Veeder Root system for the 20,000 gallon tanks, are the suppliers allowed virtual/electronic access? The City doe s not currently have vitual/electronic access, but is anticipating having it in the future 63 Can we provide a "No Bid" on Section C ‐ 9. Propone Tank Installation and Fueling Specifications portion of the BID? Yes, pleas e refer to Addendum One 64 Under the Fee Proposal, what Index (Base Price) are we to use when determining the differential above/below OPIS? Ex: LA OPIS Unbranded Rack Avg. Only stated under Wet Hosing.

The base prive is Los Angeles CA OPIS GROSS 10:00 AM EST Daily Rack Average with Car+ 65 On page 2 the city is requesting letter of intent to be submitted. Can the City of Santa Ana confirm the due date for the letter of intent? Not seeing deadline on the RFP
The Letter of Intent is optional and due at any time during the duration of the Bid 66 Can the city of Santa Ana please give clarification on the letter of intent requested? A letter of intent is simply a statement  that the Contractor provides to inform the City of the intent to bid submitted via email to the Project Manager 67 Can the city advise if there any special fittings required for any of the tank locations? There are none 68 Can city please advise how many deliveries per year will be needed for each emergency generator locations. The frequency of fue l deliveries is dependent upon usage 69 Can city advise  what carrier is currently making the emergency generator deliveries? Fueling delivering for emergency generato rs are performed internally 70 Can the city please supply the bid tabulations for the current contract. Please refer to PlanetBids for RFP 17‐108 Fuel ‐ Gasoline and Diesel hƩps://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/20137/bo/bo‐detail/41783 71 Can the city supply a couple of bill of ladings for gasoline and diesel fuel. The Water Division cannot release those records a  this time 72 Will a Truck and Trailer be able to fit at all fueling stations for the city? Yes 73 Will a Semi truck be able to fit at all fueling stations for the city. Yes 74 Can the city state, is this all or nothing RFP? Do you have to bid on all sections of the bid to be responsive. Refer to Addend um One 75 Can city state what will the propane be used for for? The propane powered vehicles are listed in the Scope of Services 76 What is average delivery size of gasoline and diesel to the corporation yard and the PD Site. The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard is 7,500 gallons for unleaded. The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard is 8,800 gallons for diesel. The average delivery size to the Police Department is 8,800 gallons for unleaded. 77 How many deliveries in the range of 7,000 plus for gas and diesel for the Corporation yard? Around 80 to 90% of deliveries annu ally range in 7,000 plus. 78 How many deliveries for 7,000 plus for gas and diesel for the PD site. Fall into this range. Around 80 to 90% of deliveries ann ually range in 7,000 plus. 79 How many deliveries fall in the range of 7,000 plus for gas and diesel for the Corporation yard. Around 80 to 90% of deliveries  annually range in 7,000 plus. 80 Does the city allow for split combination deliveries between corporation and PD site? Yes 81 What are the city payment terms? Payment term is net forty‐five (45) days per Attachment 4 Section 3. Term 82 Will city accept ACH payments? Yes
83 How many deliveries fall between the range of 3,500‐6,999 for gas and diesel? Usage quantites are approximate and shall not be  interpreted as quantitied ordered 84 Can city state the range of gallons for RD99 and RD95? In order give a delivery charge rate per gallon. Refer to Addendum One 85 Can city advise if the non‐conclusion affidavit has to be notarized? Yes, please notarize per the conditions specified in the N on‐Collusion Affidavit 86 OPIS does not have index for propane. Can the city advise if we need to utilize the weekly BPN news letter index? Utilize weekl y BPN news letter index for propane 87 Will the city be open to use a bigger tank for propane usage? Ye s 88 Can the city please confirm we need to utilized the OPIS daily rack average report with Car.  For fuel deliveries of gasoline, clear diesel, red dyed diesel, and renewable fuels.

Please refer to Addendum One
89 Can city advise currently what you are paying for fuel tenders / fuel trailers. This would be for reduced rate, standard rate, and extended rate
The Water Division cannot release those records a this time 90 What is average delivery of gasoline and diesel for the Corporation yard/ The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard is 7, 500 gallons for unleaded. The average delivery size to the Corporate Yard is 8,800 gallons for diesel. 91 What is the average delivery of gasoline and diesel for the PD site. The average delivery size to the Police Department is 8,80 0 gallons for unleaded. 92 What is the classifications for a vendor to have a local preference discount for city of Santa Ana? There are no local preferan ce discounts for the City of Santa Ana 93 Can city please advise if your company headquarters resides in the city of Santa Ana. Does qualify the vendor for the local preference discount.

The Water Division is located in Santa Ana (220 S Daisy Ave, Santa Ana CA 92703)  
City Council
 23 – 34
12/20/2022
 

94 Can city please advise if your company has a office within the city of Santa Ana. Does that qualify the vendor for the local preference discount.

The Water Division is located in Santa Ana (220 S Daisy Ave, Santa Ana CA 92703) 95 Can city please advise who is currently making gas and all grades of diesel deliveries. What transport company currently making deliveries.

Please refer to PlanetBids for RFP 17‐108 Fuel ‐ Gasoline and Diesel https://pbsystem.planetbids.com/portal/20137/bo/bo‐detail/41783 96 Can the city please confirm we need to submit the fee scheduled, in addition to the fee proposal on page 24. A rates schedule a nd a fee schedule shall be permitted per Scope of Services Section K 97 Can the city please give a little more clarification on the requested "fee scheduled. Please advise exactly what we need to submit on this schedule. Hard to give a cost on equipment, labor, material, if we do not know how much the project will require. Please advise.

A rates schedule is an hourly rate; if the specifications in Section K do not apply, please omit 98 Can city please advise if your currently billed separate lines items for fuel surcharge, and pump charge fees. Besides the stop in transit fee.

The City is not billed separate line items for fuel surcharge and pump charge fees  
City Council
 23 – 35
12/20/2022
 

EXHIBIT C

City Council
23 –
36 12/20/2022

City of Santa Ana
Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services (RFP No. 22-110), bidding on 10/07/2022 1:00 PM (PST)

Page 1 of 7 ends

Printed 11/18/2022
PlanetBids, Inc.

City Council
23 –
37 12/20/2022

City of Santa Ana
Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services (RFP No. 22-110), bidding on 10/07/2022 1:00 PM (PST)

Page 2 of 7 ends

Printed 11/18/2022
PlanetBids, Inc.

City Council
23 –
38 12/20/2022

City of Santa Ana
Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services (RFP No. 22-110), bidding on 10/07/2022 1:00 PM (PST)

Page 3 of 7 ends

Printed 11/18/2022
PlanetBids, Inc.

City Council
23 –
39 12/20/2022

City of Santa Ana
Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services (RFP No. 22-110), bidding on 10/07/2022 1:00 PM (PST)

Page 4 of 7 ends

Printed 11/18/2022
PlanetBids, Inc.

City Council
23 –
40 12/20/2022

City of Santa Ana
Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services (RFP No. 22-110), bidding on 10/07/2022 1:00 PM (PST)

Page 5 of 7 ends

Printed 11/18/2022
PlanetBids, Inc.

City Council
23 –
41 12/20/2022

City of Santa Ana
Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services (RFP No. 22-110), bidding on 10/07/2022 1:00 PM (PST)

Page 6 of 7 ends

Printed 11/18/2022
PlanetBids, Inc.

City Council
23 –
42 12/20/2022

City of Santa Ana
Gasoline and Diesel Supply and Delivery Services (RFP No. 22-110), bidding on 10/07/2022 1:00 PM (PST)

Page 7 of 7 ends

Printed 11/18/2022
PlanetBids, Inc.

City Council
23 –
43 12/20/2022

Finance and Management Services
www.santa-ana.org/finance
Item # 24
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
December 20, 2022
TOPIC: American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Consulting Services AGENDA TITLE:

Approve an Agreement with Guidehouse Inc. for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Compliance Consulting Services (Revive Santa Ana Program)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Guidehouse Inc. for ARPA Consulting Services for a two-year term, beginning December 20, 2022 through December 19, 2024 with a provision for two one-year renewals exercisable by the City Manager, for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $400,000, subject to non- substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
On July 20, 2021, the City Council authorized the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan made possible by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) through U.S. Department of Treasury (DOT) Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). The spending plan is intended to protect and revive the Santa Ana community as it emerges from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The City is responsible for the effective administration of these funds in accordance with the SLFRF Compliance and Reporting Guidance and the Uniform Guidance of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The City must implement robust internal controls and effectively monitor the Revive Santa Ana projects to ensure compliance with all applicable federal rules and regulations. In order to support City staff with these efforts, City Council authorized a new consulting services agreement with Guidehouse Inc. (Formerly Grant Thornton Public Sector, LLC) on December 21, 2021 after the Finance and Management Services Agency performed a competitive process via Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-093. The agreement was authorized for an initial trial period of six-months plus a six-month extension, which expires on December 21, 2022.

Guidehouse Inc. has provided staff valuable assistance in addressing various compliance questions and reporting requirements, and shared their in-depth knowledge of the SLFRF guidelines with staff during the first year of the agreement. As the City continues to expend the SLFRF funds on Council approved projects through December 2026, staff

City Council
24 –
1 12/20/2022

Amendment to a contract to Guidehouse Inc. for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) consulting services
December 20, 2022

Page 2 ends

3 1
2 2
expects ongoing compliance related requests. Having a consultant with a high level of technical knowledge and experience in federal grant management and audits as a resource will allow the City to manage SLFRF funded projects more effectively and ensure continued compliance with grant guidelines.

As such, staff recommends contracting with Guidehouse Inc. to perform ARPA consulting services for a period of two years with a provision for two one-year renewals in accordance with the terms and conditions of RFQ No. 21-093.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds in the amount of $400,000 are currently available in the following accounting account. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward into next fiscal year for expenditure.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit-Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description
Amount
FY22-23 18110013-62300 American
Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA)
ARPA-FMSA $100,000
FY23-24 18110013-62300 American
Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA)
ARPA-FMSA $100,000
FY24-25 18110013-62300 American
Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA)
ARPA-FMSA $100,000
FY25-26 18110013-62300 American
Rescue Plan
Act (ARPA)
ARPA-FMSA $100,000

EXHIBIT

1. Professional Services Agreement – ARPA Consulting Services Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, FMSA Executive Director
Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager

City Council
24 –
2 12/20/2022

Page 1 of 12 ends

AGREEMENT WITH GUIDEHOUSE INC.

TO PROVIDE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT (ARPA)

CONSULTING SERVICE
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 20th day of December, 2022, by and between Guidehouse Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Consultant”), and the C ity of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS
A. On July 20, 2021, the City Council authorized the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan made possible by the American Rescue Plan Act ( “ARPA”) through U.S. Department of Treasury (“DOT”) Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“CSLFRF”). The spending plan is intended to protect and revive the Santa Ana community as it emerges from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

B. On August 26, 2021, the City issued a Request for Qualifications No. 21 -093 (“RFQ”) seeking to retain a Consultant having special skill and knowledge in the field of implementing robust internal controls and effectively monitor the Revi ve Santa Ana projects to ensure compliance with all applicable federal rules and regulations to assist the City’s Finance & Management Services Agency with navigating and complying with the evolving and complex regulatory and programmatic CSLFRF guidance.

C. On December 21, 2021, the City entered into Agreement #A-2021-253 (“Agreement”) with Grant Thornton Public Sector, LLC (“Grant Thornton”), to provide services, as detailed in the RFQ, attached hereto as Exhibit A to the Agreement. The term of the Agreement runs until December 21, 2022.

D. On September 30, 2022, Grant Thornton officially merged with Guidehouse Inc., and pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Consultant has provided American Rescue Plan Consulting Services to the City.

E. Consistent with the City’s purchasing rule and regulations, City seeks to engage Consultant to provide this vital consulting service per the requirements established by the RFQ by way of a new agreement with the Consultant. Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide such services to the City.

F. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
24 –
3 12/20/2022

Page 2 of 12 ends

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES

Consultant shall perform during the term of this Agreement, the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required to fully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Grant Thornton’s Proposal to the RFQ attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference. Consultant warrants that it shall perform the services in accordance with applicable professional standards. This warranty is in lieu of, and Consultant expressly disclaims, all other warranties, express, implied or otherwise, including without limitation any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Consultant does not warrant computer hardware, software or services provided by other parties not retained by Consultant to provide services pursuant to this Agreement.

2. COMPENSATION

a. City agrees to pay, and Consultant agrees to accept as total payment for its services for City, the rates and charges identified in Exhibit A. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed Four Hundred Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($400,000).

b. Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Recitals which may reasonably be expected by City.

c. As the recipient of ARPA CSLFRF funds, Consultant will be required to comply with any and all compliance requirements for the use of CSLFRF funds, any and all reporting requirements for expenditures of CSLFRF funds, as well as compliance with 2 CFR 200.332 regarding pass-through entities.

3. TERM

This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above for a two (2) year term with the option for the City to grant up to two (2) one- (1) year extensions, exercisable by a writing by the City Manager and the City Attorney, unless terminated earli er in accordance with Section 15, below.

4. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent Consultant and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manne r in which Consultant performs the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be

City Council
24 –
4 12/20/2022

Page 3 of 12 ends

responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. Consultant may use third -parties to provide administrative and operational support to Consultant business operations. All of these third party service providers are subject to confidentiality obligations to protect the confidentiality of City data. Such entities may be located within or outside the United States.

5. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS

This Agreement creates a non -exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, Deliverables, as defined in the statement of work , fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are delivered by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non - exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the sub contractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City , provided however that Consultant shall be entitled to rely on all information, data, report s and other materials provided by the City. The information contained in documents prepared by Consultant in the course of providing services under the terms of this Agreement is for the sole use of the City in accordance with the purpose of this Agreement hereunder. The Deliverables are not for a third party’s benefit or reliance, and Consultant disclaims any contractual or other responsibility or duty of care to others based upon the Services, Work Product or Deliverables. Any Work Product, Deliverables, or documents delivered by Consultant shall be released only in accordance with the California Public Records Act or with the prior written permission of Consultant. Except to the extent expressly provided hereto to the contrary, no third -party benefici aries are intended under this Agreement.

Consultant shall retain sole and exclusive ownership of and all right, title and interest in and to any know-how, concepts, techniques, methodologies, ideas, processes, models, templates, tools, utilities, routines and trade secrets of Consultant that existed prior to this engagement or that, to the extent they are of general application, may have been discovered, created or developed by Consultant as a result of its own efforts during this engagement (collectively, the “Consultant Property”). The City shall acquire no rights or interest in the Consultant Property, except for a non-exclusive, non -transferrable, royalty -free right to use such Consultant Property solely in connection with any deliverable or work produ ct to the extent any Consultant Property is incorporated therein. The City will not sublicense or otherwise grant any other party any rights to use, copy or otherwise exploit or create derivative works from the Consultant Property.

Consultant’s work pape rs are not part of the Deliverables and shall remain the confidential property of Consultant in accordance with professional standards.

6. INSURANCE

Prior to undertaking performance of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall maintain and shall require its subcontractors, if any, to obtain and maintain insurance as described below:

a. Minimum Scope and Limit of Insurance

City Council
24 –
5 12/20/2022

Page 4 of 12 ends

1. Commercial General Liability (CGL) : Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

2. Automobile Liability: ISO Form Number CA 00 01 covering any auto (Code 1), or if Consultant has no owned autos, hired, (Code 8) and non -owned autos (Code 9), with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

3. Workers’ Compensation: as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) : insurance appropriate to the Consultant’s profession, with limit no less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $4,000,000 aggregate.

5. Broader Coverage: i f the Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the Consultant. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.

b. Other Insurance Provisions

1. Additional Insured Status: The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Consultant’s insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or if not available, through the addition of both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 if a later edition is used).

2. Primary Coverage: For any claims related to this contract, the Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.

Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

City Council
24 –
6 12/20/2022

Page 5 of 12 ends

3. Notice of Cancellation: Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.

4. Waiver of Subrogation: Consultant hereby grants to City a waiver of any right to subrogation that any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against the City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer.

5. Self-Insured Retentions: Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention.

The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self - insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.

6. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.

7. Claims Made Policies (applicable only to professional liability):

i. The Retroactive Date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work.

ii. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work.

iii. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the contract effective date, the Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work.

8. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the Consultant’s obligation to provide them.

City Council
24 –
7 12/20/2022

Page 6 of 12 ends

The City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

9. Subcontractors: Consultant shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirement s stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors.

10. Special Risks or Circumstances: City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

7. INDEMNIFICATION

Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant.

8. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION

Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement.

9. RECORDS

Consultant shall keep fee and expense information and work product documentation

City Council
24 –
8 12/20/2022

Page 7 of 12 ends

(“Records”) and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement.

Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such R ecords and invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Upon reasonable advance notice, Consultant shall allow the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such Records pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all Records related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement.

Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything in this Agreement, nothing in this section or any audit or inspections hereunder, shall violate or cause Consultant to violate any of Consultant’s professional standards, privacy, confidentiality or legal obligations.

10. CONFIDENTIALITY

If Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of th is Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential inf ormation includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in r ightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law , legal action or order of accounting oversight body; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City.

11. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE

Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement.

12. NON-DISCRIMINATION

Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.

City Council
24 –
9 12/20/2022

Page 8 of 12 ends

13. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT

This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein.

14. ASSIGNMENT

Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other contractors retained by City.

15. TERMINATION

This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the C ity unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate.
b. Payment need not be made for work that fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.

Consultant reserves the right to, in whole or in part, decline to perform services if information comes to its attention indicating that performing any Services could cause Consultant to be in violation of applicable law, regulations or standards or in a conflict of interest, or to suffer reputational damage.

16. WAIVER

No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by

City Council
24 –
10 12/20/2022

Page 9 of 12 ends

the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.

17. JURISDICTION - VENUE

This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.

18. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES

Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.

19. NOTICE

Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other tel egraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons:

To City:

Clerk of the City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988
Fax: 714- 647-6956

With courtesy copies to:

Executive Director,
Finance and Management Services Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-17)
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
Fax: 714-647-5414

City Council
24 –
11 12/20/2022

Page 10 of 12 ends

To Consultant:

A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set fort h above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.

20. FUNDING-RELATED PROVISIONS

Funds from CSLFRF program, will be used to fund all or a portion of this Agreement. As applicable, Consultant shall comply with all federal requirements including, but not limited to, the following, all of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference:

a. Sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act as added b y Section 9901 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (the “Act”);

b. U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) Final Rule for the Act , available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2022-01-27/pdf/2022-00292.pdf;

c. Treasury Compliance and Re porting Guidance for the Act , available at https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/SLFRF-Compliance-and-Reporting-Guidance.pdf;

d. 2 C.F.R. Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, other than such provisions as the U.S. Department of the Treasury may determine are inapplicable to the CSLFRF program and subject to such exceptions as may be otherwise provided by the U.S. Department of the Treasury;

e. Treasury Coronavirus Local Fiscal R ecovery Fund Award Terms and Conditions ; and

f. Federal contract provisions attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.

Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all of the provisions stipulated in this Agreement. With respect to any conflict between such federal requirements and the terms of this Agreement and/or the provisions of state law and except Guidehouse Inc.

Attn: Office of the General Counsel
1676 International Drive, Ste. 80
McLean, VA 22102

City Council
24 –
12 12/20/2022

Page 11 of 12 ends

as otherwise required under federal law or regulation, the more stringent requirement shall control.

21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. The Agreement is the final and complete agreement and any prior or contemporaneous agreements for similar services between the parties is superseded by this Agreement . This shall not apply where the Parties are current ly engaged and Consultant is providing services not contemplated by this Agreement c. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.
d. The City agrees to the use of electronic method s to transmit and receive information, including confidential information. Consultant shall not be responsible or liable for any (i) service interruptions of or (ii) corruption or damages (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise) to the City’ s or third party’s information systems and the information and data contained therein, including but not limited to denial of access, automatic shut-down of information systems caused by or resulting from Consultant’s performance of the Services, to the ex tent such interruptions and damages were beyond its reasonable control upon exercise of reasonable and customary security and other measures as customary in the industry.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.

ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA

Kristine Ridge
Clerk of the Council City Manager

[signatures continued on next page]

City Council
24 –
13 12/20/2022

Page 12 of 12 ends

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SONIA R. CARVALHO CONSULTANT:

City Attorney

By:

Brandon Salvatierra
Deputy City Attorney

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

Kathryn Downs, CPA
Executive Director
Finance and Management Services Agency

Graeme Finley
Partner

Kathryn Downs (Dec 5, 2022 14:53 PST)

City Council
24 –
14 12/20/2022

EXHIBIT A

PROPOSAL TO RFQ

City Council
24 –
15 12/20/2022

This proposal or quotation includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used or disclosed – in whole or in part – for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal or quotation. If, however, a delivery order is awarded to this offeror or quoter as a result of – or in connection with – the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government’s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction is contained in sheets marked “Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation.”

City of Santa Ana

American Rescue Plan Act Consulting Services
RFQ #21- 093
Proposal
November 3, 2021

City Council
24 –
16 12/20/2022

This proposal or quotation includes data that shall not be disclosed outside the Government and shall not be duplicated, used or disclosed – in whole or in part – for any purpose other than to evaluate this proposal or quotation. If, however, a delivery order is awarded to this offeror or quoter as a result of – or in connection with – the submission of this data, the Government shall have the right to duplicate, use, or disclose the data to the extent provided in the resulting contract. This restriction does not limit the Government’s right to use information contained in this data if it is obtained from another source without restriction. The data subject to this restriction is contained in sheets marked “Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation.”

City of Santa Ana
American Rescue Plan Act
Consulting Services

Proposal

Prepared for:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92702
In response to RFQ# 21- 093
Dated September 13, 2021
Addendum 1, September 2, 2021
Addendum 2, September 7, 2021
Prepared by:

4695 MacArthur Ct Suite 1600
Newport Beach, CA 92660
www.grantthornton.com

Point of Contact:

Graeme Finley, Principal
T 571.242.0478
F 916.449.3981
[email protected]

On January 1, 2020, Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton LLP” or “Parent”), a federal and state and local government contractor since 2001, reorganized its Public Sector service line into a wholly-owned subsidiary named Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC. All of the assets and personnel associated with Grant Thornton LLP’s government practice (except for its government financial audit and attest practice that will remain with the Parent) have been transferred to the new subsidiary, Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC.

Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC have entered into a Services Agreement, which provides for the two entities to provide assistance to each other on government contract opportunities and engagements.

Grant Thornton LLP and Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC are each other’s primary teaming partners, as specially demonstrated throughout this proposal (in addition to other specified subcontractors, collectively “Team Grant Thornton”).

City Council
24 –
17 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. i
November 3, 2021
Sarah Ro, Accounting Manager
City of Santa Ana – Finance and Management Services Agency 20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701

Subject: REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) NO. 21- 093 FOR AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT CONSULTING SERVICES (Revised Scope of Work)

Dear Ms. Ro:

Thank you for the opportunity to demonstrate how we can support the City of Santa Ana (City) manage funding received from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) by providing comprehensive financial management and advisory services. The City’s Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan outlines a bold program to continue its response to the COVID-19 public health emergency and achieve a holistic and equitable recovery to its effects. Our response will demonstrate proven experience and qualifications assisting communities to effectively manage funding received from the federal government to implement a wide range of projects to recover, restore, and grow vital community services and facilities.

Our team is excited for the opportunity to bring the experience, methods, and knowledge we have gained over years of federal fund management, including recent experience managing all the major COVID-19 response and recovery funds (Provider Relief Fund, Coronavirus Relief Fund, FEMA Public Assistance , Homeowner Assistance Fund, and Paycheck Protection Program), to join the City’s team in implementing the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan. Outside of our grants core competency, we are a management consulting firm with relationships that will flexibly support the City’s needs as they arise. This includes a robust information technology advisory practice, teams working at the Federal level with U .S. Treasury and other Federal program owners. Plan.

Our firm has performed hundreds of Single Audits for grant recipients and supports our clients in being ‘audit ready’ when we are not the auditor. We are monitoring for the Fall release of the 2CFR200 Appendix XI Compliance Supplement which will provide detailed audit guidance for ARPA-related programs. In the meantime, we have developed checklists based on the August 2021 audit guidance. We are proposing single audit expertise as part of our team.

The Grant Thornton Team has local technical and industry capabilities backed by a global infrastructure and subject matter experts. We have over 250 Grant Thornton partners and professionals in the greater Los Angeles area, we are committed to delivering the City of Santa Ana the right people with various skill sets across Public Sector. The Southern California practice is comprised of offices in Los Angeles, Irvine and San Diego. Our Los Angeles office serves both public and private clients in a variety of industries including state and local government, entertainment, aerospace and defense, high tech, and professional services.

On Thursday, October 28, our team participated in an interview with staff from the City’s Finance and Management Service Agency to review and clarify our team’s approach to the revised scope work for Request for Services Number 21-093. As discussed in the interview, our team fully understands, and accepts, the revisions to the scope of work made by the City. To demonstrate our team’s understanding and acceptance of the City’s revisions, we have revised our original response to RFQ 21- 093 via a red- line and strikethrough format. In this format, the City will be able to easily identify the changes we have made to our proposal and approach to align to the City’s expectations for professional services.

City Council
24 –
18 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. ii
As the leader of our California Public Sector Practice, I am authorized to commit the firm to agreements.

Thank you again for the opportunity for us to demonstrate how we can support the City. Our proposed Scope of Services and cost proposal are valid for 90 calendar days. If you have any questions or would like to schedule a presentation by our team, please contact me, Graeme Finley ([email protected] or 571-242-0478) or our contract specialist, Virginia Dawson ([email protected] or 512-692-1235).

Sincerely,

Graeme Finley
Principal
T +1 571 242 0478 | E [email protected]

City Council
24 –
19 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. iii
Table of Contents

1.0 Agreement Statement ....................................................................................................................... 4

2.0 Firm and Team Experience ............................................................................................................. 14

2.1 Description of Grant Thornton ..................................................................................................... 14

2.2 Project Manager: Dustin Hinkel................................................................................................... 14

2.3 Staff Experience and Resumes ................................................................................................... 17

2.4 Proposer’s Experience Providing ARPA Consulting Services .................................................... 20

2.5 Data Requirements from City ...................................................................................................... 31

2.6 Limits on Liability ......................................................................................................................... 32

2.7 Warrant of Errors and Omissions Insurance ............................................................................... 32

2.8 Authorized Signer ........................................................................................................................ 32

2.9 Pending Legal Actions and Litigations ........................................................................................ 32

3.0 Cost Proposal .................................................................................................................................. 33

4.0 Certifications.................................................................................................................................... 35

4.1 Attachment A: References ......................................................................................................... 35

4.2 Attachment B: Proposer’s Statement .......................................................................................... 38

4.3 Attachment C: Non-Collusion Affidavit ........................................................................................ 40

4.4 Attachment D: Non-Lobbying Certification .................................................................................. 43

4.5 Attachment E: Non-Discrimination Certification .......................................................................... 45

4.6 Attachment F: Resumes .............................................................................................................. 48

5.0 References ...................................................................................................................................... 61

6.0 Evidence of Financial Capacity ....................................................................................................... 62

7.0 Insurance ......................................................................................................................................... 63

List of Tables:

Table 1: Features and Benefits ..................................................................................................................... 3 Table 2: Grant Thornton's ARPA Consulting Experience ........................................................................... 20

List of Figures:

Figure 1: Organizational Chart .................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 2: Grant Thornton Personnel Experience ........................................................................................ 17

City Council
24 –
20 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 1 Executive Summary
Background
The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 is the latest COVID-19 stimulus package approved by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Biden on March 11, 2021. ARPA is a $1.9 trillion economic stimulus bill. Within ARPA, the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) provides $350 billion in direct funding for states, municipalities, counties, tribes and territories including $130 billion for local governments. The SLFRF provides a substantial infusion of resources to help cities like Santa Ana with economic stabilization, equity realization and the pursuit of fiscal recovery. In response to the extraordinary and unprecedented social and economic impacts of the ongoing, public health emergency caused by the Coronavirus pandemic, the City of Santa Ana developed and adopted the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan. This comprehensive response and recovery program will provide critical investments to enable the successful continuation of the City’s short-term response and long-term community recovery. Critical priority projects have been identified to support the recovery through direct program assistance; public health and safety initiatives; investments in critical infrastructure; and supporting the City’s fiscal health.

To implement the Revive Santa Ana Plan, the City requires assistance with navigating and complying with the evolving and complex regulatory and programmatic guidance frameworks developed for the various funds created by ARPA, specifically the SLFRF. The City is seeking support with project eligibility determinations, developing and supporting required program reports, compliance with the Uniform Guidance (2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200)1 for administrative requirements, cost principles procurement requirements, and subrecipient monitoring.

Grant Thornton and the Grant Thornton Team.

At Grant Thornton, we believe in making business more personal and building trust into every result. We are committed to quality, purpose-driven results and value relationships. Grant Thornton’s risk services portfolio includes solutions that offer program management, equitable distribution of funds , emergency grants management, fraud detection and prevention, internal controls, eligibility quality assurance, pre- audit readiness and strategic program integrity services, We assist clients overcome the complex regulatory landscapes to implement critical projects and social services that meet the needs of citizens and their communities. Our team is comprised of former state finance directors, city and county administrators, mayors, governors, grants specialists, and government financial managers who have seen firsthand what it takes to make financial recovery successful. In California, we support pandemic relief funding requirements for Marin County, Golden Gate Bridge and the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (Metrolink). We serve governments at the federal, state, and local levels, which has afforded us a unique perspective on the obstacles inherent in managing federal grant and audit readiness processes.

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of a large CPA firm (Grant Thornton LLP) with a track record of 97 years serving clients in audit, tax and advisory services across 51 offices in the United States. We have solidified our commitment to serving clients in California by establishing offices in Irvine, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego, Silicon Valley, and San Francisco.

1 On December 26, 2013, OMB Circular A-133 was superseded by the issuance of 2 CFR part 200, subpart F. Among other things, those changes increased the audit threshold to $750,000 for auditee fiscal years beginning on or after December 26, 2014 and made changes to the major program determination process. The Compliance Supplement (Supplement) is based on the requirements of the 1996 Amendments and 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, which provide for the issuance of a compliance supplement to assist auditors in performing the required audits.

City Council
24 –
21 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 2 Features and Benefits
As discussed throughout our response, our team offers several differentiators s. As a large firm, we provide cost-effective access to specialized expertise as questions arise. We pride ourselves on delivering excellent client service and staffing our engagements with true subject matter experts.

Features of Our Approach Benefits to the City of Santa Ana Evidence Comprehensive Understanding of
Recovery Funding Options
Balanced advice, and consideration
for similar program models when
reviewing eligibility.

Our knowledge of the full recovery
landscape uncovered opportunities
to maximize program dollars for
New Castle County (FEMA
PA/CRF) and healthcare clients
(PRF/FEMA PA)
Compliant, Efficient Reports Grant Thornton, as one of the nation’s largest audit, tax and
advisory firm, is well equipped to
support the City’s ARPA reporting
needs. Our team will build and
maintain a framework to efficiently
extract and analyze data required
for reporting project performance.

In our service to the nation’s largest
healthcare systems our grants team
built custom templates to assist our
clients identify, calculate, and report
expenses and lost revenues
attributable to COVID-19 in
compliance with Provider Relief
Fund requirements.

For the past 3 years, the Grant
Thornton team has efficiently
completed over 250 federal fiscal
accountability reports, on a
quarterly basis, on behalf of the
state of Florida’s Region 4
subrecipients across 8 counties to
the Public Assistance Program
Specialized Expertise in Lost
Revenue Calculations
Defensible lost revenue
calculations.

Our team has helped dozens of
clients interpret, understand, and
apply methods to calculate and
demonstrate lost revenues.

Specialized Compliance Monitoring
Expertise
Our understanding and close
monitoring of US Treasury OIG
guidance will confirm that costs
claimed are substantiated and
compliant with current legislation
and any and all updates to existing
guidelines. The City will have
access to all the knowledge we’ve
gathered throughout our
interactions with Federal and state
agencies, including
communications, best practices and
compliance playbooks that have
been tested against regulatory
frameworks such as 2.CFR.200.

These resources are constantly
updated by our Subject Matter
Experts who are supported by
dedicated policy analysts.

Grant Thornton has served as a
Uniform Guidance compliance
monitor for the states of Florida and
Texas to efficiently review and
provide compliance risk
assessments and corrective action
plans on over 3,100 applications for
the reimbursement of over $285M
through the Public Assistance
Program
Grant Thornton’s New Castle CRF
management team has drafted
several eligibility and position
statements on behalf of the County
to align project costs to the
Treasury’s guidance requirements
and 2 CFR 200 best practices.

Experienced Audit Readiness The proposed team includes a dedicated single audit subject
matter expert and the City can tap
into an extensive network of public
sector auditors
In supporting the state of Florida
and New Castle County, the Grant
Thornton team compiles and
maintains support and justification
documentation in organized
packages specifically set up to
assist clients and demonstrating

City Council
24 –
22 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 3 compliance auditing standards and
best practices
Specialized training developed and
delivered by subject matter experts
Through our teams’ interactions
with City staff, we will be able to
identify potential training
opportunities to enhance the City’s
understanding of prevalent
reporting and compliance risks for
COVID-19 relief funding
Grant Thornton has developed and
delivered a training program related
to both FEMA Grants Management
and COVID-19 CARES Act, as well
as supporting documents related to
procurement practices,
documentation requisitions, and
program administration. This would
help the City gain the subject matter
expertise as they relate to the
CARES Act and grants
management.

Infor Experience Infor is a strategic teaming partner
for Grant Thornton. We have a
deep bench of resources with
experience implementing Infor’s
Lawson ERP product
Infor is a strategic teaming partner
for Grant Thornton, with a particular
focus on serving Public Sector
customers. We have a deep bench
of resources with experience
implementing Infor’s Lawson ERP
product, and were named Infor’s
overall Partner of the Year in 2019.

Table 1: Features and Benefits
Response
Our response provides a competent, professional team with expertise helping local governments and entities navigate the complex and dynamic regulatory environment of COVID-19 response, recovery, and relief funds. As demonstrated throughout our response with our extensive experience, we provide the City with the confidence that decisions made, and actions taken to advance the goals of maximizing its residents’ recovery from the impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency, will be based on experience and expertise.

City Council
24 –
23 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 4 1.0 Agreement Statement
Grant Thornton accepts in principle the contract terms and conditions included in the solicitation as drafts of certain provisions of a contract, the final terms of which we anticipate being mutually negotiated through clarifications, changes and additional provisions to cover the circumstances of the engagement as finally awarded. Grant Thornton reserves the right to negotiate the terms and conditions outlined in the City’s solicitation and as required by our industry professional standards for the mutually agreed upon scope of services to be provided to the City by Grant Thornton. We are confident that we will be able to come to a mutually satisfactory agreement with the City regarding terms and conditions, as we have many times in the past in similar procurement situations with public sector entities. The included terms and any specified exceptions shall not be interpreted to prohibit Grant Thornton from pro posing additional or alternative contract terms and conditions during negotiation of the final contract upon award.

City Council
24 –
24 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 14 2.0 Firm and Team Experience

2.1 Description of Grant Thornton
Grant Thornton LLP is the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd, one of the world’s leading organizations of independent assurance, tax, and advisory services. Proactive teams, led by approachable partners, use data, best practices, experience, and instinct to understand complex issues for public sector, privately owned, and publicly listed clients. More than 8,000 Grant Thornton personnel, across over 51 offices (including six across California - Los Angeles, over 250 partners, managers and staff in our Orange County office, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco and Silicon Valley), are focused on making a difference to clients, colleagues and the communities in which we live and work.

Grant Thornton Public Sector Practice
Grant Thornton launched its Public Sector Advisory Services in 1997. Since then, we have provided grants management and compliance services across the spectrum of federal, state and local agencies .

We bring subject matter experts to assist in designing an overall framework under which recovery program funds are evaluated and planned. We help the City conduct necessary analyses to understand the eligibility restrictions and compliance requirements of proposed projects for SLFRF funding. In this manner, program goals are established to align funds where and when they are needed. In reviewing the scope of work, a clear foundational requirement for grants and financial management experience exists.

This is a core competency within Grant Thornton Public Sector, and for the firm as a whole. At the Federal level, we have provided grants oversight and grantee technical assistance services on behalf of the largest awarding agencies in government. At the State and Local levels, we help recipients manage hundreds of direct federal grants and state-pass through grants, including detailed reviews of eligible expenses. We currently provide clients with COVID-19 relief fund support across the funding life cycle.

Recent examples include engagements by the counties of New Castle, Delaware and Marin, California to help them manage CARES Act, ARPA and other COVID-19 relief grants by administering pass-through funding to hundreds of subrecipients. We provide these recent examples in our past performance write- ups. During the COVID-19 pandemic, members of our proposed team assist dozens of non-profit, and for- profit, healthcare providers manage and report on the use of over $640 million in payments from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Provider Relief Fund.

2.2 Project Manager: Dustin Hinkel
Mr. Hinkel is a dynamic and innovative leader
with over 12 years’ experience in the fields of
emergency management and local government
administration. Dustin began his career in
emergency management and public service by
focusing his university education on the physical
and societal effects of natural and technological
hazards. He leveraged his education and
continued his professional development to
become the youngest County Emergency
Management Director and, later, County
Administrator in the state of Florida. His special
expertise is in the areas of local government
administration, grants management, crisis
response, management, and recovery, strategic
planning, and policy development and
implementation.

Mr. Hinkel has led teams providing financial management and advisory services to recipients of federal funding from every major Coronavirus related legislation passed by the Congress, including the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (Treasury), Coronavirus Relief Fund (Treasury), Provider Relief Fund (Health and Human Services), and COVID-19 Public Assistance Program (Homeland Security).

Representative Sample of PRF Clients
Dustin Hinkel as a key delivery team member
Client Location
AtlantiCare Egg Harbor, NJ
AHRC New York City, NY
Beebe Health Lewes, DE
Berkshire Health Pittsfield, MA
Doylestown Hospital Doylestown, PA
Geisinger Health Danville, PA
Grand View Health Sellersville, PA
Indiana University Health Indianapolis, IN
Maine Health Portland, ME
Rutgers University Health New Brunswick, NJ
St. Francis Health Cape Girardeau, MO
St. Joseph Hospital System Paterson, NJ
WellSpan Health York, PA

City Council
24 –
25 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 15 Mr. Hinkel will be responsible for leading the GT Team in its day-to-day operations supporting the City’s team implementing, monitoring, and reporting the City’s Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan. He will be available to the City, at the City’s team’s convenience, via email ([email protected],com) and phone (850-545-7355).

Dustin M. Hinkel, MA
Dustin’s Outstanding Qualifications for Project Manager • COVID-19 Relief funding experience includes:
– Project Manager - Town of Elsmere, DE, State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund ($5M) – Project Manager – New Castle County, DE, Coronavirus Relief Fund ($322M) – Project Manager – Berkshire Health Systems, MA, FEMA Public Assistance ($9M) – Subject Matter Expert – Multiple Healthcare Systems – Provider Relief Fund ($640M) • Mr. Hinkel’s experience in local government includes service in the roles of County Administrator, Emergency Management Director, Assistant County Administrator, and Purchasing Director. • Mr. Hinkel is a Subject Matter Expert in the interpretation and application of the uniform administrative guidance for federal awards
Mr. Hinkel meets or exceeds all requirements for Project Manager as stated in the SOW.

Relevant Experience
COVID-19 – Town of Elsmere, DE State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund Management - Dustin serves as Project Manager leading engagement staff to assist the Town of Elsmere, DE manage, disburse, and document its payment from the US Treasury’s State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund. Mr.

Hinkel performs research into the underlying legislation and guidance to produce eligibility determinations and justification documents on behalf of the Town. He also provides management consulting services to the Town and advises on support documentation and systems to maintain compliance with uniform administrative guidance for federal awards.

COVID-19 – New Castle County, DE Coronavirus Relief Fund Grant Management - Dustin serves as Project Manager leading engagement staff to assist New Castle County, DE manage, disburse, and document its allocation of $322,000,000 from the US Treasury’s Coronavirus Relief Fund. He manages a team of 9 testers reviewing over 336 applications received by NCC from Subrecipients. Dustin developed and implemented the tools and policies that the testers use to evaluate Subrecipient applications and supporting documentation for compliance with federal, state, and local policies and guidance. Dustin reviews internal applicable policies and procedures as well as newly created community grant programs and advises on compliance risk based on his research of the US Treasury’s latest programmatic guidance and his experience managing federal and state disaster response and recovery grant programs.

He continuously monitors the US Treasury for updates and clarifications to its reporting and pr ogrammatic guidance and develops position papers to inform the engagement team and the client of the impact of any observed changes. Dustin also assists NCC in the identification of costs eligible for the FEMA Public Assistance Program and leads the formulation and submission of project applications.

COVID-19 – CARES Act and FEMA Public Assistance Implementation - Dustin serves as a Subject
Matter Expert and the day-to-day engagement manager directly coordinating with and serving six hospital systems located throughout the United States, St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center in New Jersey, Berkshire Health System in Massachusetts, Doylestown Hospital in Pennsylvania, BayHealth in Delaware, Calvary Hospital in New York, Rutgers Behavioral Health System in New Jersey, and Grand View Hospital in Pennsylvania. He also serves as an as-needed grants management Subject Matter Expert for service lines throughout the firm regarding state and federal grant programs created in response to COVID-19. He leverages his grant management experience to review clients’ cost documentation practices and develop and implement solutions to bring those practices into compliance to receive funding from the Departments

City Council
24 –
26 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 16 of Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Commerce, and other federal and state funding agencies. He monitors and researches several funding opportunities, including DHHS’s Provider Relief Fund, FEMA’s Public Assistance Program, Treasury’s Coronavirus Relief Fund, and FCC’s Telehealth Program, and develops, implements, and manages funding strategies tailored to the needs of each client to maximize funding opportunities and returns on COVID-19 related costs and minimize risk for duplication of benefits. To date, Dustin has assisted his clients in the application, receipt, and allocation of over $200 million in funds received for the reimbursement of COVID-19 related costs.

In his engagement with Berkshire Health Systems, Dustin has the led the formulation and submission of six applications to FEMA’s Public Assistance Grant Program seeking reimbursement of over $8.5 million in emergency protective measures costs related to COVID. Dustin researched and developed cost justification narratives, summarized costs, compiled supporting documentation, and serves as a point of contact for BHS for questions regarding the applications.

Florida Division of Emergency Management Region 4 Public Assistance Grants Management - Mr.

Hinkel serves as a Team Lead within the FDEM Irma Public Assistance Program management engagement supervising a team of 8 grant management specialists and is responsible for the validation and management of over 85 disaster recovery projects totaling over $100 million in state and federal grant funding. The team, under Dustin’s supervision and management, analyzes and validates 100% of Subrecipient supporting documentation for compliance with state and federal policy requirements. Dustin has innovated and implemented several process improvements and workflows to standardize procedures resulting in superior quality and maximum efficiency. Mr. Hinkel is often consulted by Team leadership, FDEM, and the over 1,200 subrecipients served by the Team as a Subject Matter Expert in the areas of grant management, 2 CFR 200 compliance, and state and local government fiscal accountability processes. As the Team Lead, Mr. Hinkel is responsible for the quality and delivery of all deliverables, communication with Subrecipients, and the performance of disaster recovery project site inspections.

Taylor County, Florida Board of County Commissioners - Mr. Hinkel served the residents of Taylor County, Florida in multiple roles including as County Administrator and Emergency Management Director.

As the County Administrator, Mr. Hinkel was responsible for all planning and operations of the county including providing overall supervision and leadership in the provision of critical public services to the residents and visitors of Taylor County, Florida. He reported to and coordinated with the elected board of County Commissioners to develop, implement, and monitor official policies, directives, and ordinances.

Mr. Hinkel was responsible for negotiating, on behalf of the Board, all contracts and agreements with local constitutional officers, hospital executives, and state and federal agencies. He was responsible for developing for approval and implementation the county’s annual operating and capital budget. As Emergency Management Director, Mr. Hinkel led the County’s Emergency Response Team in its response and recovery from Hurricane Hermine, Tropical Storms Andrea and Debby, Deepwater Horizon, and several local non-federally declared emergencies. During these emergencies he built and oversaw the County’s incident command system, including public information operations and state and federal agency coordination. During non-emergencies, he was responsible managing the day-to-day operations of the department including state and federal grants management and maintaining the county’s all- hazards planning, training, and exercise program.

Work History
 Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, August 2018 - present  Disasters, Strategies, and Ideas Group, LLC, January 2017 – July 2018  Taylor County Board of County Commissioners, December 2009 – December 2016

Education and Certifications
M.A., Natural and Technological Hazards Geography, University of South Florida B.S.SCL, Environmental Science and Policy, University of South Florida

City Council
24 –
27 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 17 2.3 Staff Experience and Resumes
Grant Thornton provides a Program Accountability Office (PAO) to assist the City in managing and reporting upon recovery funds. The Program Controls and Standards and Reporting and Data Compliance teams assist the City in documenting an overall recovery framework to guide funding decisions, to identify and optimize grant opportunities, and to assess the eligibility of proposed uses. Our Federal Funding Compliance team establishes and documents foundational internal controls to enable compliance, conducting tests of internal controls on an agreed upon schedule.

Below is an organizational chart demonstrating how our team is organized to meet the City’s needs . Also included in this section is an experience matrix to concisely summarize our team’s experience with the essential duties as outlined in the RFQ and brief background information for each of our team members.

As requested in the RFQ, the resumes of all professional staff, detailing their educational background and relevant experience, are supplied in Section 4.6: Attachment F.

As discussed in the October 28, 2021 interview, our team is experienced in working with public sector staff with varying experience and knowledge of federal uniform guidance requirements for the management of awards. Our approach to supporting the City’s project managers will be tailored to each manager’s experience and understanding of federal grants management processes and requirements. In all interactions, our team will prioritize education as part of our communications with project managers to enable increased efficiency in efforts for data gathering and reporting. Due to the size and ambiguity of the federal COVID-19 grants programs, each of our engagement teams have a federal Single Audit subject matter expert attached. Rachel Stushek will serve in this role and has experience developing training for public sector audiences on Uniform Guidance compliance and best practices. Upon the City’s request, this training can be delivered in a manner to allow for earning CPEs.

Figure 1: Organizational Chart

Figure 2: Grant Thornton Personnel Experience

City Council
24 –
28 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 18 Grant Thornton’s Team Knowledge and
Comparable Experience
Verify compliance with ARPA (SLFRF) rules and
guidelines.

Screen expenditures, verify eligibility, and
provide recommendations.

Provide assistance with preparation of ARPA
(SLFRF) compliance reports.

Assist in calculating revenue loss per ARPA
(SLFRF) requirements.

Provide technical assistance regarding ARPA
(SLFRF) compliance and reporting
Provide recommendations for compliance
matters including but not limited to Activities
Allowed, Eligibility, Procurement, and
Reporting.

Provide assistance to City staff with preparation
of audits.

Develop internal communication materials of
Treasury guidelines related to ARPA (SLFRF) for
City agencies.

Tamara Reynolds, MBA, PMP
Engagement Partner
Wendy Morton-Huddleston, MBA, PMP, CGFM
Engagement Quality Reviewer

Dustin Hinkel, MA
Project Manager
Poupée Kim, CICA
Federal Funding Compliance Supervisor
Christina Suthammanont, PhD, PMP
Program Controls and Standards Supervisor
Khiry Burke
Reporting and Data Compliance Supervisor
Rachel Stushek
Audit SME
David Barth
State and Local Grants Compliance SME
Susanna Koo
Cross-Functional Expertise Support
Eric Fey
Cross-Functional Expertise Support
Tim Luzano
Senior Compliance Specialist

 Wendy Morton-Huddleston, Engagement Partner. Wendy is a Risk Advisory Services Leader and Principal in Grant Thornton’s Public Sector practice. She has over twenty-five years of experience in project management, enterprise risk management, financial management, business process optimization, grants management, internal controls and strategic planning. Wendy currently serves as a senior advisor for several accounts to assess quality service delivery, methodology effectiveness and client satisfaction. Wendy is the 2020-2021 National President of the Association of Government Accountants (AGA) and an executive sponsor of the Women at Grant Thornton Business Resource Group (BRG) driving the mission of diversity, equity and inclusion.  Tamara Reynolds, Engagement Quality Reviewer. Tamara is Grant Thornton’s state and local practice leader. Her team provides advisory services to government entities at all levels of all types of government (e.g. public higher education institutions, state agencies, county and city governments,

City Council
24 –
29 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 19 and authorities). Ms. Reynolds brings 20+ years of consulting experience, including 10+ years leading risk management (including grants management) engagements.  Poupée Kim, Federal Funding Compliance Supervisor. Poupée is a seasoned manager with extensive experience in providing disaster recovery, program management support and grant administration to federal, state and local governments. Her specific focus has been on Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs and FEMA Public Assistance funding, in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Ike, Irma and Michael. Ms. Kim has 15 years of quality control review, professional services and oversight consulting experience to state, local and federal government stakeholders. She is a Certified Internal Controls Auditor (CICA).  Dr. Christina Suthammanont, Program Controls and Standards Supervisor. Christina is a Senior Associate in Grant Thornton’s Public Sector Digital Transformation and Management practice.

Combined, she has twenty years’ experience in higher education, customer engagement, resource optimization, and workforce analytics. She has led numerous independent and collaborative research projects, from initial documents review and data collection through analysis, reporting, and presenting to both technical and non-technical audiences. Christina has a doctorate (PhD) in quantitative political science and holds certification as a Project Management Professional (PMP).  Khiry Burke, Reporting and Data Compliance Supervisor. Khiry is a Senior Associate in Grant Thornton’s Public Sector Risk Advisory and Management practice. Mr. Burke has 5+ years of experience in internal auditing, financial analysis, contracts compliance, federal grant monitoring, project database management, and support of system update/modernization. Khiry has lead teams through the Compliance Monitoring life cycle that resulted in quality deliverable submission.  David Barth, State & Local Grants Compliance Subject Matter Expert. Dave will advise on all requirements of the ARPA/SLFRF award. He has over twenty years of experience with grants and financial management systems and over forty years of experience working with state governments focused on financial management solutions and advisory services. He leads multiple state and local government engagements supporting CARES Act, ARPA and FEMA disaster recovery activities. He has extensive experience with governmental business operations and is considered a subject matter expert in many fields within the firm. Prior to joining Grant Thornton, he was the Director of Budget and Finance for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and was responsible for the overall financial management of the Department’s operating budget, federal grant programs and debt funding.
 Rachel Stushek, Audit Subject Matter Expert. Rachel has over 17 years of experience providing auditing support to non-profit organizations. Ms. Stushek has approximately 4 years of experience working with Federal entities. She has experience serving under audits that were performed under Government Accountability Office (GAO) “Yellow Book” auditing standards, American Institute of Public Accountants (AICPA) auditing standards, and OMB Circular A-133/uniform guidance. Rachel leads audit and assurance engagements providing quality assurance role, risk managem ent and serves as a consultative resource for technical questions and issues for various audits, performance audits, and examinations.
 Susanna Koo, Cross-Functional Expertise Support. Susanna is a Senior Associate at Grant Thornton’s Public Sector Los Angeles office with over 3 years of professional management consulting experience. Ms. Koo has led projects and teams to success utilizing strategic business planning. She has a strong ability to support all business functions and prioritize tasks to execute project deliverables.
 Eric Fey, Cross-Functional Expertise Support. Eric is an adaptable professional applying general government experience in the public sector while located in our Sacramento office. Eric demonstrates proven talent for analyzing problems using data, developing, and simplifying procedural improvements and operations design. He has developed a particularly strong understanding of the following areas: technical report research, writing and editing, statistical Analysis, and project management.
 Tim Luzano, Senior Compliance Specialist. Mr. Luzano is a Manager with Grant Thornton Public Sector, LLC. He is an accomplished data management practitioner overseeing engagements

City Council
24 –
30 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 20 regarding data governance, data quality, and data integration. Mr. Luzano is also an accomplished finance professional with demonstrated ability performing financial analysis including, but not limited to Income Statement analysis, Budgeting, Forecasting, and Cost Planning. Mr. Luzano has extensive Public Sector experience working with Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), and Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT).

2.4 Proposer’s Experience Providing ARPA Consulting Services Outlined in the table below, Grant Thornton lists the specific tasks in the scope of services and has compared six relevant engagements and how our team completed similar tasks. Below the table, we have provided a detailed summary of the similar services performed in relation to those requested in the RFQ scope of work.

Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District (April 2021 - Current) - Grant Thornton currently provides support to manage the cost recovery and reimbursement of costs incurred as a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Providing expertise related to the FEMA Public Assistance (PA) process, public sector finance and grants management, as well comprehensive strategy to maximize and expedite reimbursement. Our team is responsible for assisting the District’s Finance department with documenting processes in compliance with FEMA regulations. We categorize and track costs in support of the financial reimbursement process and provide recommendations on inter-departmental charges and intra-state mutual aid requests for response activities. Sample projects include emergency operations center, personal protective equipment (PPE) and COVID-19 vaccination distribution.

County of Marin, Department of Finance (December 2020 – Current) - Grant Thornton currently supports the County by providing Disaster Cost Recovery Services and grants management support for FEMA’s Public Assistance program for costs incurred due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are guiding the County through the FEMA reimbursement process by providing programmatic and hands-on support in the formulation and processing of PWs and documents for and through FEMA’s Grants Portal. This effort confirms that the costs claimed in these PWs comply with applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations, executive orders, and FEMA regulations. Additionally, our team is responsible for recommending and assisting in the establishment of Table 2: Grant Thornton's ARPA Consulting Experience

City Council
24 –
31 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 21 programmatic document control, file retention system and data management process to validate that disaster records are complete and ready for audit, assisting in the identification and pursuit of additional federal and/or state grant funding to bolster recovery efforts, and issuing recom mendations for improving the County’s grants management processes to maximize their available federal funding. We conduct testing for cost categories such as labor, rental equipment, mutual aid and management costs.

New Castle County (August 2020-present) - Grant Thornton currently provides subrecipient monitoring and pre-audit readiness services to New Castle County related to their subawards of CARES Act funding. Our team assisted the County in formulating a strategy to verify compliance with federal policy by developing a comprehensive subrecipient monitoring policy. This policy includes issuance of subgrant agreements, as well as a comprehensive risk assessment. Grant Thornton also created a scoring matrix to tailor subrecipient monitoring using a risk-based methodology. Our team developed a software-based tool which enables the County to automate the self-assessment survey process for subrecipients. This tool saves the County time and effort by collecting and compiling data which can be entered into the risk assessment.

Metrolink (June 2020-September 2020) - Grant Thornton assisted Metrolink with CARES Act implementation and financial modeling services that enabled internal/external reporting to support audit readiness, transparency reporting, and compliance with applicable program requirements. Our professionals aided Metrolink in managing claims to recover eligible expenses and lost revenues from COVID-19 with the primary focus on recoveries from the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) and FEMA. Our team developed an easily accessible internal executive dashboard available to our client for internal reporting. The dashboard provided key performance indicators and metrics that provided information on disaster planning, preparedness, and recovery regarding CARES Act expenses eligible for reimbursement, claim assistance, and FEMA reimbursement determination of eligibility.

State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management (March 2018-present) - Grant Thornton is providing comprehensive grants management services to the State of Florida associated with their administration of FEMA’s Public Assistance Programs. Our work begins with direct involvement in project worksheet (PW) approval and continues through project closeout. Our work involves reviewing PWs in Grants Portal before providing recommendations to the state to approve or return the project to FEMA for amendments. This review includes identifying documentation necessary to support claimed costs and reconciling those costs to the total eligible amount. Grant Thornton is providing 100% validation of all claimed costs consistent with Florida’s contract requirement. Our work confirms that our client meets this requirement by monitoring subrecipients for compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and policies, including 2 CFR 200, the FEMA Public Assistance Program and Guide (Version 4), and other sources of grants governance.

Our compliance program is designed to verify expense eligibility by confirming that all claimed costs qualify as allocable, allowable, and reasonable. Grant Thornton enables our client to comply with federal laws governing pass-through entity responsibilities by managing the subaward and grant agreement process, reconciling eligible costs in their grants management system, and guiding subgrantees through validation to closeout by being a liaison between them and the State of Florida. To date we have processed over 1,800 reimbursements for 900+ projects amounting to over $180M i n eligible costs related to $99M in federal funds.

New Jersey Treasury (July 2015 – December 2021) - Grant Thornton was engaged by the NJ Department of Treasury to provide integrity monitoring of the recovery efforts of the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission’s (PVSC) $500 million in FEMA funded recovery work and oversee the procurement and contracting compliance of 12 engineering or construction contracts with values greater than $5 million. Grant Thornton’s monitoring effort included a process review of PVSC’s financial, administrative and procurement systems for compliance with FEMA requirements; compliance review of each project’s procurement bid documentation; monitoring and

City Council
24 –
32 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 22 reporting of contractor schedules and deliverables, the financial auditing of contractor payments against the schedule of values, monitor labor payments for consistency with Davis-Bacon, and provide on-going support and advice to PVSC and the State Department of Treasury. Through our efforts Grant Thornton was able to identify areas of compliance risks and developed corrective actions. Grant Thornton provided specific recommendations to improve PVSC’s procurement weaknesses and help develop contract language that would be compliant with federal procurement requirements.

2.4.1 Review City developed ARPA Spending Plan detailing proposed expenditures to validate compliance with ARPA (SLFRF) rules and guidelines, including screening expenditures, verifying eligibility, and providing recommendations

Based on the revised scope of work and October 28, 2021 interview, the Grant Thornton team understands that the City will not require its vendor make eligibility determinations for the initial items referenced within the City Council’s approved spending plan. From the interview, we understand that eligibility determinations may be needed for future proposed projects.

Our team’s approach has been purposefully designed to scale with agility to meet the City’s requirements to collect and communicate the information necessary to demonstrate compliance with programmatic and federal regulatory requirements throughout the lifecycle of each unique project funded by the City’s payment from the SLFRF. As discussed in the October 28, 2021 interview, one of the first steps our team will take will be to meet with the City’s finance staff, and project managers as appropriate, to evaluate the current state of SLFRF funded projects and propose services, see Figure 2a, that best enable the City to continue to support each project’s unique compliance requirements.

Figure 2a: Team Grant Thornton’s Comprehensive Grants Management Approach

Each phase of our team’s approach is designed to contemporaneously generate the administrative documentation the City will need to demonstrate effective and compliant oversight of each SLFRF funded project throughout its lifecycle. Our team’s culture of open and accessible communication and its governance of facilitating real-time audit readiness will guide our team’s efforts in supporting the City’s project managers. Each of the City’s project managers will have access to the support they need through an assigned point-of-contact from Team Grant Thornton as well as the ability to contact Team Grant Thornton’s Project Manager directly when needed. Our team will enable audit readiness by recognizing the phase in which each SLFRF funded project resides and begin working with the project managers to extract the data and information needed to produce the compliance deliverables depicted in the

City Council
24 –
33 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 23 approach. With our team supporting the City’s administrative needs in the background, this approach allows the City’s project managers to focus directly on the overall performance of the project. As discussed in the October 28, 2021 interview, if a project already has an eligibility determination, then our team will accelerate past Phase 1 of our approach to assess the project for opportunities to support in the administrative data and information collecting and communicating necessary to emerge from Phases 2 or

3. For future projects, the Grant Thornton Team is prepared to support the administrative needs of the City’s project managers by seamlessly integrating into the project through open and accessible communication to extract the critical administrative data and information needed to demonstrate the project’s compliance with programmatic and federal regulatory requirements with as little interruption as possible to the progress of the project itself or the overall operations of the project manager’s d epartment. By following the activities listed for each phase our team will develop and compile the documentation necessary to tell the project’s compliance story in real team. By focusing on communication and audit readiness our approach is scalable and flexible to provide the city with only the services it needs. Our approach will include the following phases.
• Phase 1: Pre-Award (Assess). In this phase our team will assess a project for its eligibility according to programmatic policies and guidance. Our team will commit to the foundation for the successful implementation of the project by vetting it through our eligibility determination process.

Our team will work with the city to identify, analyze, and communicate the necessary information needed to demonstrate the project’s eligibly through the Treasury’s eligibility framework and tests.

Our determinations will go further to also discuss and educate on the project’s anticipated reporting and uniform guidance compliance requirements. • Phase 2: Award (Procure). Once a project has been determined, and properly justified, as eligible, our team will engage in assisting the city with documenting the procurement the critical goods and services needed to implement the project. Activities in this phase include the performance of policies and procedures reviews to identify gaps in adherence to compliance requirements and recommendations to mitigate risks for non-compliance. During this phase our team will enable the City to demonstrate compliance through the compilati on of procurement and labor activity documents, documentation of procurement decisions in alignment with compliance best practices, and documentation of risk mitigation employed to bring practices into compliance. • Phase 3: Post-Award (Monitor). Demonstrating oversight of a project is a critical step in the process of communicating compliance to the federal government’s uniform guidance for grant awards. Whether the project calls for the oversight of subrecipients, vendors, or force account labor staff and equipment, our team will assist the City in developing and executing monitoring plans designed to extract data and information necessary to meet reporting and compliance obligations. Our team will develop communications strategies and data captur ing tools to meet the unique needs of the project and capabilities of the project managers. • Phase 4: Closeout. In our experience, the best time to focus on audit readiness is when all the decisions that made a project successful are still fresh in the team’s mind. Our closeout phase is designed to be the final stop of the project’s lifecycle wherein not only are expenditures reconciled to the project’s budgets and progress reports, but the various procurement and programmatic decisions are revisited to enable an opportunity to completely align those decisions to programmatic requirements and guidance. Our team will reconcile all project expenditures to demonstrate consistency with the amounts reported by the city in quarterly and annual reports.

Our team will also compile all determinations, justifications, procurement and oversight documents, and other support documents into one organized package ready for review by outside auditors.

In implementing this approach to assist the city in its management of the disbursement of its payments from ARPA, our team will be supported by our Public Audit Subject Matter Expert, Rachel Stushek.

Rachel has over 17 years of experience providing auditing support to non-profit organizations and 4 years of experience working with Federal entities. She has experience serving under audits that were

City Council
24 –
34 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 24 performed under Government Accountability Office (GAO) “Yellow Book” auditing standards, American Institute of Public Accountants (AICPA) auditing standards, and OMB Circular A-133/uniform guidance.

Rachel will be available to the GT Team and the City’s team to provide insight and guidance on the compliance risk for decisions ranging from procurement of services, management of subawards (contractors or subrecipients), cost reasonableness standards, and documentation compliance.

The Grant Thornton’s team expertise and experience in providing guidance on grant compliance is critical to the City’s smooth implementation and management of ARPA (SLFRF) funds. Grant Thornton collaborates with City stakeholders to understand the goals and objectives of the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan’s (Plan) expenditure categories and confirm the alignment of those goals and objectives of ARPA SLFRF. Our team conducts a review of the Plan’s proposed programs, services, and infrastructure projects for their eligibility as ARPA-funded projects. We have provided similar or identical eligibility reviews and compliance validation services for several entities seeking to maximize their CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Funds (CRF) and funding criteria of other federal agencies and non-government entities. For example, we currently support New Castle County, Delaware government in screening nearly 2,000 proposed teacher projects, which were to be processed through a vendor contractor, for their eligibility per CRF requirements as outlined in U.S. Treasury guidance and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). Subsequent reviews were performed on the specific items proposed within each project for their eligibility. Where appropriate, Grant Thornton diligently worked with our client to document the logic for accepting materials based on inferences drawn from Treasury guidance for items that may not have been explicitly referenced as examples of eligible costs. Thus, we are able to help our client maximize their use of CRF while maintaining eligibility and compliance requirements.

In addition to the teachers’ program, additional eligibility and compliance reviews and recommendations are provided for this client’s paid administrative leave expenditures. The transfer of CRF from the County to multiple state programs include many that are comparable to the programs in the Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan (e.g., business assistance, child daycare, adult technical training program), and fire and municipality costs.

Other clients for whom we have conducted expenditure eligibility reviews include:

• Berkshire Health Systems, Inc. (April 2020-present) - Grant Thornton is providing a COVID- 19 eligibility and strategy program to Berkshire Health Systems by identifying where additional eligibility and/or separate claims are appropriate given the services and/or organizational ownership and structure of these organizations. Our role includes providing Berkshire Health tailored project activities, phasing recommendations, and outlined activities and work streams.
• State of Florida, Division of Emergency Management (March 2018-present) – Grant Thornton is providing comprehensive grants management services to the State of Florida associated with their administration of FEMA’s Public Assistance Programs. Our work involves reviewing Project Worksheets in Grants Portal before providing recommendations to the state to approve or return to FEMA for amendments. This review includes identifying documentation necessary to support claimed costs and reconciling those costs to the total eligible amount. With a 100% validation requirement, we reaffirm that our client meets this requirement by audit ing subrecipients for compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and policies, including 2 CFR 200, the FEMA Public Assistance Program and Guide (Version 4), and other sources of grants governance. Our compliance program is designed to verify expense eligibility by confirming that all claimed costs qualify as allocable, allowable, and reasonable. Grant Thornton enables our client to comply with federal laws governing pass-through entity responsibilities by managing the subaward and grant agreement process, reconciling eligible costs in their grants management system, and guiding subgrantees through validation to closeout by being a liaison between them and the State of Florida.
• State of Texas, Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) (October 2011-June 2018) – Grant Thornton provided support for program management of FEMA subgrants to local governments in Texas impacted by the presidentially declared flooding disasters in 2015 and 2016. Our work involved review and approval, on behalf of local governments (FEMA

City Council
24 –
35 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 25 Subrecipients), the scope and funding allocations provided by FEMA, managing the execution of subgrant agreements with the local governments; providing project oversight and quarterly reporting to TDEM and FEMA; reviewing compliance with FEMA program requirements; and providing reimbursement recommendations to TDEM based on authorized expenditures and compliance with procurement processes.

2.4.2 Provide assistance with preparation of ARPA (SLFRF) compliance reports

As discussed in the October 28, 2021 interview, the City will have access to Grant Thornton’s complete data analytics team to receive feedback on the City’s dashboard. Grant Thornton has deep experience in developing, deploying, and maintaining
both internal and public facing
dashboards for public sector clients
throughout the country. Grant Thornton
takes a unique approach to developing
dashboards by taking a collaborative
and business focused approach. Our
team will meet with senior leadership to
thoroughly understand the City’s goals
and objectives and develop meaningful
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
related to the City’s Performance
Management Initiatives. Our data and
analytics team leverage a hierarchical,
drill-down approach to building
dashboards. We have experience building executive summary dashboards that provide senior leadership with a one-stop, at a glance view to see total ARPA funds, where the funds are being distributed, and to which agency. An example dashboard we have developed for other clients is shown in Figure 3 .

We also have the ability to develop dashboards at the Performance Management Initiative level.

Typically, these initiatives are tied to the State’s Strategic Plan (e.g., Broadband, Economic Development, and Sustainability). We have experience collaborating with the Program Managers to develop high level KPIs to monitor stimulus funding activity. We have integrated dynamic drill down capabilities which allows the users to research various metrics such total obligations, budget requested, funding approved, and amount disbursed.

Grant Thornton also has the
capability to take geospatial
approach to our grant
management analytics.

This approach takes Grant
Management reporting to
the next level by
transforming static, tabular
data into visually appealing
maps letting the users
clearly identify where their
projects are located. Our
maps are integrated into
interactive dashboards that allows the users to drill down and analyze data by boundaries such as congressional districts, zip codes, and census tracts. Additionally, we apply layers to the map to transform data into information that allows the users to generate actionable insights. Examples of applicable layers include COVID case counts and racial/demographic data to show equitable distribution of ARPA funds.

Grant Thornton’s Data Analytics team is comprised with experienced and highly educated data scientists and analysts with a specific skill set for storytelling with data and has developed various business intelligence and data visualization dashboards for state and local government agencies. Additionally, our Figure 3. Example of Executive Dashboard
Figure 2b. Example of Broadband Equity Dashboard

City Council
24 –
36 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 26 analytics team has web development skills with a deep understanding of web user experience and data integration. After our analytics team develops the various reports and dashboards, we can provide technical assistance with the aesthetics, user experience, functionality, and embedding of reports and dashboards into the City’s website.

In the event the City were to implement a comprehensive website with applicable communication strategy, Grant Thornton leverages Esri’s Hub site which is a platform that allows for low code/no code web development. Esri Hub sites are particularly useful for internal and external communication and engagement with stakeholders. Our approach to building comprehensive websites focuses on displaying the central theme (e.g., Grants Management) on the home page. We have experience building sub-pages that correspond to the City’s strategies or initiatives (e.g., Broadband, Sustainability, Economic Development) and embed dynamic, interactive, and engaging content such as dashboards as well as links to videos for educational webinars.

As a recipient of a payment from the SLFRF with a population exceeding 250,000 residents, the City is required to comply with the SLFRF’s most frequent and detailed reporting requirements. The City is required to submit quarterly Project and Expenditure Reports and an annual Recovery Plan and Performance Report. Grant Thornton has the expertise and tools to assist the City in maintaining compliance with the SLFRF’s reporting requirements and elevate the quality of these reports to help the City use the reports to progress its communications goals. For example, we have assisted clients throughout the country complete and submit required reports to many federal funding agencies, including the completion of over 200 quarterly reports on behalf of the subrecipients of the state of Florida’s administration of over $200 million of federal pass-through grants from FEMA’s Public Assistance Program. Our team will optimize the City’s efforts to develop and communicate its progress toward its recovery goals by infusing our tools and methods to assist in critical areas for information gathering and synthesis, including community engagement, data analysis, and performance measurement.

Community Engagement. One way of promoting transparency is through community engagement. The flow of information must be a two-way street. We can develop Esri Hub pages that allow public facing information via interactive dashboards that can provide user specific (e.g., demographic, geographic, socioeconomic) data to various initiatives such as Emergency Rental Assistance, Economic Development, Health and Safety, and Sustainability.

Data Analysis. Grant Thornton can provide
the City with expertise on how to effectively
analyze and convey a story from an equity
perspective with data. Our team of highly
trained analysts not only have the technical
skills for analysis (e.g., ETL, Business
Intelligence, and Data Visualization), we also
have the skills to translate technical terms into
relatable messages that foster comprehension.

Develop Insights. Additionally, our team of data scientists can take the analysis to the next level to develop insights from predictive and prescriptive models and algorithms to support data- driven decision making. An applicable use case can be applied to housing assistance by leveraging demographic, socio- economic, and geographic data and applying algorithms to determine who best would benefit from receiving funds, based on data and statistics.

Performance Management. The key to success
is monitoring progress. Grant Thornton has
helped numerous State and Local agencies
develop benchmarks and Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs) regarding their Performance
Management initiatives. Performance
Management is especially crucial with Equity. A
main component regarding Equity and
Performance Management consists of a
composite equity index score derived from

City Council
24 –
37 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 27 separate initiative equity index scores. The crux of many state and local agencies revolves around optimizing funds. Grant Thornton’s analytics team would apply an optimization model to maximize equity indices by the proper allocation of funds. Bringing equity full circle, our Performance Management initiatives tie directly back to community engagement to demonstrate progress and transparency.

2.4.3 Assist in calculating revenue loss per ARPA (SLFRF) requirements

As discussed in the October 28, 2021 interview, the Grant Thornton Team understands, and acknowledges, that the City does not require assistance with the calculation of revenue loss per ARPA (SLFRF) requirements and methods. To demonstrate our understanding, we have made the following updates to our technical approach regarding this subject.

2.4.4 Provide technical assistance to City staff regarding ARPA (SLFRF) compliance and reporting requirements, including, but not limited to, recommendations for activities allowed, eligibility, procurement, and reporting

As discussed in Section 2.4.1, our approach will be tailored to identify and implement the unique compliance strategies needed for each project funded by the City’s payment from the SLFRF and tasked to the Grant Thornton Team. Each member of our team has experience working with varying levels of knowledge and experience with the federal government’s uniform guidance for grant awards. Our team will collaborate closely with each project manager to develop a communications strategy that makes sense for their understanding of guidance and compliance principles as well as the meeting within the project’s timeline. Our team includes many former state and local government officials, who understand the pressures that project managers are under and will focus on adding value by viewing every interaction with a project manager as an opportunity to not only provide an administrative service, but to educate the project manager on the necessity of the administrative actions that need to be taken. This focus on education is deliberate. As a project manager’s understanding of the program guidance and federal compliance requirements increases, the efficiency of our team’s ability to extract and communicate information necessary to report and demonstrate compliance also increases. As discussed in the October 28, 2021 interview, our team has the capability of organizing and delivering more formal technical assistance training that has been accredited for CPE credits.

The City’s overarching goals for its administration of ARPA (SLFRF) funding seeks to maximize grant performance, outcomes, and impacts while reducing financial, audit, and compliance risk. Maximizing grant performance involves proactive
technical assistance capable of
identifying eligible costs to fully use
available grant funding, matching eligible
costs to multiple grant programs, and
justifying that grant funding is used to
accomplish for the purpose it was
intended. Reducing risk to the City
involves systematically and methodically
assessing and monitoring the use of
grant funding. To accomplish this, we draw from approaches which have proven effective on similar engagements. We tailor these approaches to the City to address needs or issues most efficiently as they arise. We provide support to the City with management, oversight, compliance, reporting responsibilities, and any additional services as outlined in the scope of work. Within our approach, we propose to work collaboratively with the City to assist in achieving and maintaining short and long-term goals that are consistent with the City’s Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan utilizing the SLFRF award by establishing internal controls related to the federal funding programs.

In Florida, Grant Thornton has worked with 135 subrecipients of FEMA funding managing their Hurricane Irma recovery. This work involves the review of claimed costs for eligibility, confirmation that the work was properly procured and the subrecipient provide the necessary financial reporting
documentation.

City Council
24 –
38 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 28 We routinely develop and refine our skills by providing and attending the latest training and professional development events. We have partnered with the National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA) to host quarterly Grants Management Symposiums across government since 2018 to discuss emerging trends, challenges and the impact of key legislation. Through the National Grants Management Association (NGMA), we have trained hundreds of grant management professionals at federal, state and local government including the use of integrity monitors to improve compliance and reduce risk for grantees. Our professionals are thought leaders in the industry, often publishing articles on grants management trends and best practices. Several of our professionals serve in local chapters and national level executive committees of organizations such as the Association of Government Accountants (AGA) and the Institute of Internal Auditors. Grant Thornton is also a National Emergency Management Association (NEMA) corporate partner which allows our employees to attend the annual conference and have access to both state and local emergency management directors and industry professionals. As mentioned, we will leverage our expertise to support the CITY in overseeing the SLFRF award.

Grant Thornton has a dedicated
community of practice of COVID-19 and
ARPA team that conducts regular
legislative analysis, reviews program
guidance, and monitors other federal
funding developments. The team scans
government websites, publications, and
news outlets daily to understand and
interpret on-going developments. We
have established a group of management
professionals from across the firm
(industries and business lines) to form a
COVID-19 cohort which meets twice
weekly to discuss the evolving COVID-19
recovery, review the state and local government financial support landscape, and collaborate on the development of tools and solutions to assist our clients’ needs. These policy level meetings provide our team with real-time insight into Congressional actions and federal agency developments that we share with our clients to shape their COVID-19 funding strategies.

The Grant Thornton Team’s general approach to providing technical support to the City in the development and monitoring of community recovery projects and submission of reports required by the SLFRFs to leverage our team’s collective knowledge, skills, and abilities to build upon the C ity’s tools and systems for data collection to create a standardized, repeatable process for efficient data sharing and report development. Since 2011, Grant Thornton has been providing technical assistance focused on demonstrating compliance with federal fiscal management and procurement requirements for clients like the states of Texas and Florida Divisions of Emergency Management, Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission, the Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, and Marin County, California.

With each engagement our teams have robust testing and validation procedures that build upon lessons learned. To facilitate the successful deployment of our approach, our team will employ the latest version of process automation and data analytics tools and methods developed by our Int elligent Automation Service Center (IASC). IASC operates as a centralized innovation delivery catalyst, providing solutions that both the firm and our customers can leverage to improve efficiencies.

Areas of focus include working with new platforms that provide true orchestration of systems and processes (i.e., Catalytic), automating routine tasks, optimizing employee efforts, and reducing errors. For example, when working with an alumni customer, Grant Thornton used Catalytic to extract transactions from a parent ERP application, and parse to local ledgers, in support of required financial reporting.

Automation solutions and tools, developed by IASC, that our team will employ to assist the City in meeting its data collection, analysis, and reporting requirements include:
• Invoice Processing – Created invoice matching processes in various systems to reduce manual efforts in Accounts Payable, speeding up the invoice process and creating time for resources to act on more strategic projects. Leveraged both RPA and OCR.

Grant Thornton’s COVID-19 community of practice has been operating since the first declaration of the national public health emergency. Our team provides our clients, on a weekly basis, with regular updates on the activities of all federal and state agencies, in which we are engaged, managing and impacting COVID-19 relief funding opportunities. This global approach provides our clients with the critical information they need from their particular federal and state agencies, but also provides them insights into how other states and federal agencies have interpreted and mitigated compliance issues.

City Council
24 –
39 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 29 • Inventory Price Testing – Streamlined the Inventory Price Testing process to enable teams to spend less time on manual data manipulation and more time analyzing results. • Tableau Dashboard for Financial Data – Combined spending and budget data from multiple sources, which require regular cleansing and refreshes. Developed a web browser automation tool in Python that automates the collection of financial data, performs web-scraping in support of reconciliation, and collects additional data, reducing reconciliation from 2 hours to 15 minutes. • Optical Character Recognition (OCR) - convert written or typed documents into data • Robotic Process Automation – replicate the actions of a human interacting with a screen to automate repetitive, back-office processes
• Equity impact tracking and mapping – Grant Thornton has developed its own method to measure and visualize the impact of projects towards progressing a client’s goals for promoting growth of equity and diversity. Grant Thornton’s algorithm can be deployed proactively to objectively estimate the equitable impact of a project via change in in the area’s equity index score.

In our engagement with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) (2014-2018) - CMS, Office of Financial Management, Grant Thornton conducted an internal control assessment of CMS Central Office, Regional Offices, Medicare Contractors, Data Centers (including twenty financial applications), and Shared System Maintainers. As part of this assessment Grant Thornton designed and tested approximately 75 controls in the CMS’s Marketplace cycle in such areas as 1) Eligibility and enrollment of individuals; 2) Vendor Management (review and approval of issuer payee groups for payment); 3) Payment approval of APTCs and advance CSRs, and collection of FFM user fees; 4) Reconciliation of CSR and APTC payments; and 5) Oversight of reinsurance, risk adjustment and risk corridors (premium stabilization programs). These assessments were a critical step in communicating current status to CMS’s stakeholders, particularly the IRS who holds the subsidy appropriation (APTC and CSR) for Marketplace.

The Grant Thornton Team will coordinate closely with the City’s Project Manager, and associated s taff, to select, customize, and scale our solutions and tools to best integrate with the City’s financial systems to efficiently extract, analyze, and synthesize the data and information needed to assist the City in mitigating programmatic or compliance risks and completing ARPA reports.

2.4.5 Provide assistance to City staff with preparation of audits

As discussed in Section 2.4.1, audit readiness is a governance theme that drives all four phases of our team’s approach to comprehensive grants management. Throughout each phase of the project’s lifecycle our team will create the documentation necessary to demonstrate compliance with the latest SLFRF guidance and federal uniform guidance requirements. Our team will work diligently throughout the first three phases of our approach to not only collect necessary data for reporting eligible expenditures, but will also create documents to contemporaneously memorialize critical procurement and methodological decisions and practices to align those actions to the existing compliance and programmatic guidance requirements. At the closeout phase of a project, our team will compile all supporting documents, determinations, and reports into one comprehensive and organized package to facilitate efficient reviews by programmatic and outside auditors. The closeout phase of each project will be guided by our Public Audit Subject Matter Expert, Rachel Stushek, to enable our team the opportunity to create comprehensive support documentation packages and reports to demonstrate full compliance with federal uniform guidance principles.

Grant Thornton will assist the City of Santa Ana in responding to questions from their independent single auditor specific to compliance matters and determination on eligibility, procurement methods, and ARPA reporting and will also support the City departments to prepare responses to audit findings. Grant Thornton’s audit specialists work in tandem with our Public Sector Risk Advisory team to remain abreast of relevant policy changes in real-time, thereby enhancing the audit support we provide. Combining audit expertise with our compliance approach provides an audit preparation strategy which is uniquely well suited to the City of Santa Ana’s needs.

City Council
24 –
40 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 30 Our approach to regulatory compliance advisory combines data-driven financial analytics support with a robust documentation management strategy. Grant Thornton’s compliance team leverages expertise in uniform guidance and ARPA regulation to develop project-specific cost validation worksheets.

Consultants work directly with City staff to collect and archive supporting documentation in preparation for single audit. Grant Thornton specialists will thoroughly analyze project documentation to determine cost eligibility and compliance under federal
guidelines and advise the City on
potential non-compliance risk if identified.

Further, our staff will produce
workpapers, support packages, and
policy positions supporting eligibility
determinations in preparation for single
audit.

Grant Thornton specialists will also support the City in completing reporting requirements mandated under ARPA and uniform guidance. Our staff is versed in Treasury reporting regulations and will work directly with City officials to produce any required reporting, including Interim, Project and Expenditure, and Recovery Plan Performance reports. Grant Thornton’s financial analysis and support packages play an integral role in fulfilling reporting requirements, aiding City staff in confirming eligibility figures and providing performance reporting.

Finally, our team will aid in responding to any potential audit findings arising from single audit inquiry.

Throughout the duration of project performance Grant Thornton will build comprehensive eligibility documents informed by expert knowledge of audit proceedings and regulatory requirements. We will use our evidentiary backlog to aid the City in demonstrating compliance and rationale behind eligibility determinations. Our staff will aide in stakeholder management, policy development, and compliance advisory in real time while navigating the audit process.

Our team has significant experience providing regulatory compliance advisory in preparation for audit to public sector stakeholders. Our work with New Castle County in Delaware highlights our recent experiences validating cost claims in dynamic and emerging regulatory environments. We helped the County navigate federal funding streams provided under the CARES act using many of the strategies described above, and helped the county manage major procurement programs involving numerous stakeholders. Our work with the State of Florida and the State of Texas also demonstrates our strengths in preparing cost validations for federal dollars under demanding timelines. We helped these major entities track, manage, and validate millions in federal funding involving hundreds of stakeholders.

Grant Thornton is prepared to provide our compliance advisory services for the City of Santa Ana as you manage ARPA funding across your departmental programs. We have the experience, strategy, and expertise to aid the City as it navigates funding in this complex regulatory environment. Our team has served many of the nation’s largest and most complex State and Local stakeholders, and we will provide your City with the same quality of support throughout the duration of your funding streams.

2.4.6 Develop internal communication materials including but not limited to emails, PowerPoint, and memorandums to facilitate awareness regarding both City and Department of Treasury guidelines related to the use of ARPA (SLFRF) funds

As identified in the City’s revised scope of work, the Grant Thornton team will be available to meet with City Finance and City Project Managers on timescales that make sense for each individual’s capacity and capability and at least quarterly. The City’s finance staff and project managers will have instant access to the latest developments in the SLFRF guidance and requirements as well as instant access to on-demand technical assistance services through their assigned Team Grant Thornton point-of-contact and the Team Grant Thornton Project Manager. As a communications cadence is established, our team will work diligently to maximize the time spent with the City’ s finance staff and project managers with prepared agendas to extract data and information necessary for reporting and compliance documentation, address and research issues as they arise, and communicate the latest developments with the SLFRF.

In New Castle County, Grant Thornton works with both the County’s CFO and Internal Auditor respond to questions that arise from their outside single audit firm on the County’s spending of its $322 million in CRF monies. We have helped respond to preliminary finding on the County’s FY 20 Single Audit before it was finalized and published.

City Council
24 –
41 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 31 The goal of communications is for all stakeholders involved in and affected by the project to receive and understand the information they need. With this goal in mind, Grant Thornton tailors its communication to two main groups: our internal team, and our client. Communication tactics specific to each group are described below.

Internal Team: Grant Thornton recognizes the importance of communication in accomplishing accurate, complete, and efficient service delivery. We have implemented horizontal and verti cal team communication channels to allow information to flow freely throughout all levels and sub- teams. Our Supervisors perform daily standup calls with their sub-teams to discuss the work accomplished, work planned for the day ahead, and any barriers or challenges to be addressed. Supervisors leverage the information gathered in these standups to gauge risks and issues and escalate them to management as needed. Our entire ARPA funds management team also participates in weekly touchpoints that include any big picture updates, policy and procedure changes, and training opportunities.

Our Client: At Grant Thornton, we pride ourselves on prioritizing and being responsive to client needs.

An important component of our responsiveness is communicating early and often with our client. Our ARPA funds management team will establish regular client checkpoints to confirm mutual understanding of needs and expectations. Client
checkpoints include weekly status
meetings, and ad hoc meetings. We will
also communicate frequently via email,
phone, and within provided platforms to
provide the City of Santa Ana with
access to all the knowledge we’ve
gathered throughout our interactions
with Federal and State agencies, including communications, best practices and compliance playbooks that have been tested against regulatory frameworks such as 2.CFR.200. These resources are constantly updated by our Subject Matter Experts who are supported by dedicated policy analysts.

2.5 Data Requirements from City
According to the City’s response to Question #14 of Addendum 2: Q&A, the City would like to know what types of data/information will be required from the City’s staff to complete the project. While responding to and recovering from the COVID-19 public health emergency is understandably a high priority for the City, as experienced managers of grants related to crisis response and recovery, we are sensitive to the fact that the City’s staff have many other high priorities and demands for their attention that may not be related to the projects contained within the City’s Revive Santa Ana Spending Plan. Our team’s focus in providing these services to the City will be to act as a partner and stakeholder in the City’s recovery and share in the responsibility of its administration. As partners in the City’s response and recovery w e will do our share, and play our part, so that the City’s staff can focus on other high priorities with confidence that the project’s that the City has identified as critical to the City’s response and recovery from COVID -19 will not be delayed. This process will begin in the General Planning and Reporting Meeting as detailed in the RFQ. In this meeting our team will obtain the information it needs to understand the City’s operations and clearly define the responsibilities and expectations of Team Grant Thornton. Promptly after this meeting our team will tailor its requests for information and data to specifically achieve the tasks and responsibilities that were assigned. Generally, to properly assess projects and expenditures for compliance with ARPA guidance and federal uniform administrative requirements we anticipate that some of the information and data that our team will request will include:
• Policies and procedures related to procurement, contracting, human resources, and employee compensation
• Budgetary data including general ledgers, previous audits, and general revenue collections • Procurement and use of funds information including invoices, purchase orders, and contracts In its response to Questions #1 and #11 of Addendum 2: Q&A, the City indicated that the it is tracking ARPA and other COVID-19 relief funding using the City’s Lawson Infor financial accounting system. Grant Thornton is a strategic implementation partner for Infor and maintains a strategic practice within GT to At Metrolink Grant Thornton developed web-based dashboard to report the transit authority’s COVID-19 (FTA and FEMA)
spending for both internal executive staff and well as a public communication.

City Council
24 –
42 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 32 work side by side with clients - to help them meet changing business objectives, gain operational efficiencies, improve performance, and transform data into action. When needed our team will tap into this deep pool of knowledge and expertise to improve the efficiency of our team’s data extraction and requests and support our team’s understanding and utility of the data and reports produced by the City.

2.6 Limits on Liability
Grant Thornton’s requested limitation of liability language is included in our redline.

2.7 Warrant of Errors and Omissions Insurance
Grant Thornton agrees that the firm maintains a prudent amount of errors and omissions insurance that covers negligent acts and is applicable to the work requested in the RFQ.

2.8 Authorized Signer
As a Principal, Graeme Finley is authorized to contractually bind the firm.

2.9 Pending Legal Actions and Litigations
In the normal course of Grant Thornton LLP’s and its wholly-owned subsidiary Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC’s business as a national accounting firm and government contractor (collectively “Grant Thornton”), Grant Thornton may be made a party to litigation alleging various common law and statutory violations. While Grant Thornton expects to resolve all pending matters without any material detrimental impact to the firm, like most accounting firms of any size, Grant Thornton does not disclose or discuss its litigation. Litigation is generally disposed of in the normal course of business and under any applicable professional indemnity insurance policy.

City Council
24 –
43 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 33 3.0 Cost Proposal

Not to Exceed Price: Grant Thornton is pleased to present this Not to Exceed Best and Final Offer (BAFO) estimate of $181,300.00.

Grant Thornton’s revised estimate is devised on a Time & Material basis as discussed during the orals interview on October 28, 2021 and the revised scope of services provided by the City on October 26, 2021.

Specifically, the revised scope of services reflects the following changes:
• Eliminated the initial Review of ARPA Spending Plan’s proposed expenditures (Task 1) and will only provide the reviews on an “on-going” forward basis; • Eliminated Revenue Loss Calculations (Task 3);
• Clarified the anticipated working directly with City program managers (Task 5) • Included the review of the City’s ARPA Reporting Dashboard (Task 6); Accordingly, based on our understanding of the revised scope of services we are estimating the required level of effort to the first six months to be allocated as follows:

Hours
Task 1 125
Task 2 125
Task 4 825
Task 5 50
Task 6 125

Our Time & Materials based hours will be billed based on the below hourly rates for the selected staffing assigned to assist the City.

Grant Thornton will hold the below proposed hourly rates constant throughout the six month term on all extensions thru December 1, 2023 at which time a three percent escalation will be assessed to the rates thru December 1, 2025.

Staffing Positions Hourly
Rates
Project Executive - Partner $275.00
Project Manager $175.00
Subject Matter Expert $225.00
Senior Compliance Specialist $170.00
Senior Associate $140.00
Associate $115.00

Pricing Assumptions

City Council
24 –
44 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 34 Grant Thornton’s estimated level of effort is based on our understanding of the project scope and does not include broader CARES Act or ARPA funding beyond the State and Local Fiscal Recovery Fund (SLFRF) or new stimulus related activities as may be anticipated to be expanded or extended through Congressional action.

The above pricing does not include any required travel. If travel is required, it will be billed at cost without markup and will be compliant with established GSA rates. The primary place of p erformance will be virtual due to COVID-19 pandemic public health and safety precautions.

City Council
24 –
45 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 35 4.0 Certifications

4.1 Attachment A: References
.

CITY OF
SANTA
ANA

List and describe fully the contracts performed by your firm which demonstrate your ability to provide the supplies, equipment or services included in the scope of the proposal specifications. Attach additional pages if required. The City reserves the right to contact each of the references listed for additional information regarding your firm's qualifications.

Customer Name:

New Castle County, Delaware
Contact Individual:

Michael Smith, Esq.

Chief Fiscal Officer
Address:
87 Reads Way
New Castle, DE 19720
Phone Number & E-mail:
302-395-5170
[email protected]
Contract Amount:
$2,250,000
Contract Period:

September 2020 – April 2022
Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided:

New Castle County, Delaware, received $322 million directly from the U.S. Treasury through the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) as part of the CARES Act. The County was faced with the burden of administering these funds by creating new grant programs, monitoring subrecipients for compliance, and documenting their rationale for the funding decisions they made.

Grant Thornton initially developed a comprehensive guide to the administration of stimulus funding and continues to provide regulatory guidance to the County’s Chief Fiscal Officer and County Executive. Our work includes the following key activities:
• Development of risk-based subgrantee monitoring procedures in-line with 2 CFR 200 requirements and implemented a financial documentation testing program to recommend payment to twenty-one volunteer firefighting companies and eleven municipalities within the County.
• Evaluation of grant program eligibility for private business funding, remote educational assistance, non-congregate sheltering of homeless populations,

ATTACHMENT A

REFERENCES

City Council
24 –
46 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 36 • Developed a Policy and Procedures manual which serves to justify and support charging internal county costs, such as substantially dedicated force account labor and certain administrative leave expenses;
• Work with the County’s Internal Auditor to address Single Audit findings and questions of compliance issues; and
• Provide Monthly Reporting to the County’s CARES Act Audit and Compliance Task Force Committee and Weekly Reporting to the County’s Chief Fiscal Officer.

Customer Name:

Marin County, California
Contact Individual:

Lisa DeCarlo
Division Chief – Fiscal Administrative Services
Address:
3501 Civic Center Dr. Ste. 225
San Rafael, CA 94903
Phone Number & E-mail:
515-473-5660
[email protected]
Contract Amount:
$1,121,000
Contract Period:

December 2020 – June 2022
Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided:

Grant Thornton is providing disaster recovery and emergency management services to Marin County as part of their response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Marin County has spent more than $25 million in FEMA eligible cost. Grant Thornton’s services include the following:
• Assist in navigating the FEMA Public Assistance (PA) grants process which includes project management, eligibility determinations, cost validation, and regulatory updates; • Providing subject matter expertise and coordination between FEMA, CalOES, and the County in the management of its various COIVD-19 funding sources; • Manage the County’s project worksheet development and submission through FEMA’s Grants Portal for COVID related activities. The scope of COVID related activities includes food distribution, non-congregate sheltering, mobile testing, vaccinations distribution, alternate care sites, and emergency protectives measures. • Weekly reporting to the County’s Fiscal Administrative Services Division Chief along with daily coordination with the County’s staff in the development of cost documentation.

Customer Name:

Florida Division of Emergency Management
Contact Individual:

Kassandra McGlonn
Contracts Program Manager
Address:
2555 Shumard Oak Blvd.

Tallahassee, FL 32399
Phone Number & E-mail:
850-815-4417
[email protected]
Contract Amount:
$11,264,000
Contract Period:

December 2017 – December 2021
Description of supplies, equipment, or services provided:

City Council
24 –
47 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 37 Hurricane Irma inflicted over $2.5 billion in damages across 64 counties in Florida. Grant Thornton was engaged by the Division of Emergency Management to support the financial recovery across eight counties of Citrus, Hardee, Hernando, Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinellas, Polk, and Sumter (including the metropolitan area of Tampa and St. Petersburg). We have worked with over 135 subrecipients to manage 987 projects representing $226.2 million. Our 35-person team validated and approved for payment $202.3 million on behalf of the Division.

The scope of our work includes the following major tasks:
• Direct involvement in the project worksheet (PW) approval and continues through project closeout. Our work involves qualify assurance reviews and providing recommendations to the state to approve or return the projects to FEMA for amendments. This review includes identifying documentation necessary to support claimed costs and reconciling those costs to the total eligible amount.
• Providing 100% validation of claimed costs for large project and auditing subrecipients for compliance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, and policies. This includes 2 CFR 200, the Public Assistance Program and Guide (Version 4), and other sources of grants governance. Our compliance audit program is designed to verify expense eligibility by confirming that all claimed costs qualify as allocable, allowable, and reasonable. • Confirming compliance with Federal Legislation, by providing accurate reporting on the Recipient’s performance and operations, and by processing payments timely on their behalf. This includes the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) and the Cash Management Improvement Act (CMIA).
• Verifying that the scope of project work was completed satisfactorily. This involves planning and executing site visits, as well as documenting the results of our findings.; and • Reporting on our support, managing the 135 subrecipients, through providing Weekly and Monthly Reports that detail the activities performed in the eight Florida counties.

RFQ No. 21-093 American Rescue Plan Act Consulting Services

Page 23 of 34 ends

THIS FORM MUST BE COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL. PROPOSALS THAT DO NOT CONTAIN THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED NONRESPONSIVE.

City Council
24 –
48 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 38 4.2 Attachment B: Proposer’s Statement
Grant Thornton’s completed and signed Attachment B follows this page.

City Council
24 –
49 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 39 City Council
24 –
50 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 40 4.3 Attachment C: Non-Collusion Affidavit
Grant Thornton’s completed, signed, and notarized Attachment C follows this page.

City Council
24 –
51 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 41 City Council
24 –
52 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 42 City Council
24 –
53 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 43 4.4 Attachment D: Non-Lobbying Certification
Grant Thornton’s completed and signed Attachment D follows this page.

City Council
24 –
54 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 44 City Council
24 –
55 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 45 4.5 Attachment E: Non-Discrimination Certification
Grant Thornton’s completed and signed Attachment D follows this page.

City Council
24 –
56 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 46 City Council
24 –
57 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 47 City Council
24 –
58 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 48 4.6 Attachment F: Resumes
Tamara Reynolds, MBA , PMP
Ms. Reynolds’ Outstanding Qualifications for Engagement Quality Reviewer Ms. Reynolds is Grant Thornton’s state and local practice leader. Her team provides advisory services to government entities at all levels of all types of government (e.g. public higher education institutions, state agencies, county and city governments, and authorities). Ms. Reynolds brings 20+ years of consulting experience, including 10+ years leading risk management (including grants management) engagements.

Relevant Experience
COVID-19 Advisory Services – Ms. Reynolds leads engagements which advise public, private, and not- for-profit clients in how to maximize use of federal and non-federal funding sources while retaining compliance with program guidance and regulations.

CalHFA – HRC Mortgage Relief Program – Ms. Reynolds leads Grant Thornton’s engagement team supporting the California Housing Relief Corporation (CalHRC) management of its $1.1 billion grant from the ARPA Homeowners Assistance Fund. Grant Thornton is supporting CalHRC with program integrit y, compliance reviews, eligibility determinations, fraud risk assessment and the development of internal controls for its quality assurance program.

Federal Grants Management & Recipient Technical Assistance – Prior to leading the State and Local market, Ms. Reynolds was the Key Relationship Leader for the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). As the largest grant-making Agency in the Federal government, many projects required grants management and grants recipient collaboration. Grants projects under her leadership included recipient compliance reviews for the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program, fiscal stewardship and best practices reviews of State health departments (for the CDC), technical assistance to support recipients of a Traumatic Brain Injury program, and technical assistance for State recipients of the PreSchool Development Grant B-5 grant program (for ACF).

Superstorm Sandy Emergency Grants Management – Provided emergency grants management support with clients in the NJ Office of Emergency Management and NJ Environmental Infrastructure Trust. Grant Thornton continues to provide oversight over grant-funded construction projects.

Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, January 2020 - present  Managing Principal, August 2020 - present
 Principal, January 2020 - July 2020
Grant Thornton LLP, November 2003 - December 2019
 Principal, August 2010 - December 2019
 Senior Manager/Manager, November 2003 - July 2010.

General Dynamics, Manager, April 1999 - November 2003
General Electric, January 1995 - April 1999
Education and Certifications
M.B.A, Decision Analytics/Public Policy Emphasis, George Washington University B.S., Management Information Systems, Pennsylvania State University Project Management Professional (PMP), Project Management Institute Six Sigma Blackbelt - General Electric & the American Society for Quality (ASQ) Certified Group Facilitator

City Council
24 –
59 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 49 Wendy Morton -Huddleston, MBA, PMP, CGFM
Ms. Morton-Huddleston’s Outstanding Qualifications for Engagement Partner Wendy Morton-Huddleston is a Risk Advisory Services Leader and Principal in Grant Thornton’s Public Sector practice. She has over twenty years of experience in project management, enterprise risk management, financial management, business process optimization, grants management, internal controls and strategic planning. Wendy currently serves as a senior advisor for several accounts to assess quality service delivery, methodology effectiveness and client satisfaction.

Relevant Experience
Marin County, CA Disaster Cost Recovery Services – Advise the client on disaster recovery and mitigation efforts in compliance with applicable local, state, and federal laws, regulations and FEMA requirements. Provide recommendations that impact grant eligibility, funding sources and expenditures.

Grant Thornton LLP, Florida Division of Emergency Management – Leading a team of 40+ practitioners to address grants management requirements for hurricane relief of Irma & Michael across eight counties of subrecipients (education, law enforcement, healthcare) to execute compliance reviews on behalf of the state for reimbursement from FEMA - $70M processed as of April 2020. Innovation includes the use of Robotics Process Automation and Tableau visualization to achieve efficiencies.

Grant Thornton LLP, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security (CISA) – Leading Provide advisory services in data analytics, audit remediation, and internal controls. Created efficiencies and effective controls within IT access, property management, and payment management workflows.

Grant Thornton LLP, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secret Service – Provide advisory services in pre-audit readiness, post audit corrective actions and internal controls maturity.

Grant Thornton LLP, United States House of Representatives – Provide engagement oversight and technical acumen to guide the internal control team to perform remediation of open Inspector General (IG) audit findings, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-123 requirements, testing and implementation of ERM. Business process areas include accounts payable, acquisition management, budget, and financial reporting. Provide strategic insights to the business transformation office.

Work History
Grant Thornton LLP, August 2003 - present
 Principal, August 2010 - present
 Director, August 2006 - July 2010
 Senior Manager, August 2004 - July 2006
 Manager, August 2003 - July 2004
BearingPoint (formerly KPMG Consulting), Senior Consultant, July 2001 - August 2003 Arthur Andersen, Consultant, October 1996 - June 2001

Education and Certifications
Executive Leadership Certificate, Cornell University
M.B.A., Management, University of Maryland
M.S., Finance, University of Maryland
B.S., Finance/Minor: Business Administration, Norfolk State University Project Management Professional
Certified Government Financial Manager

City Council
24 –
60 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 50 Poupée Kim , CICA
Ms. Kim’s Outstanding Qualifications for Federal Funding Compliance Supervisor Poupée Kim is a seasoned manager with extensive experience in providing disaster recovery, program management support and grant administration to federal, state and local governments. Her specific focus has been on Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) programs and FEMA Public Assistance funding, in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Ike, Irma and Michael. Ms. Kim has 15 years of quality control review, professional services and oversight consulting experience to state, local and federal government stakeholders. She is a Certified Internal Controls Auditor (CICA).

Relevant Experience
U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Administration, Office of Emergency Management, Diplomatic Continuity Program – Ms. Kim serves as a Senior Analyst lead to support the team in providing Risk Analysis, Business Process Analysis, and Business Impact Analysis for the Bureau of Administration for the Department of State (DoS). Ms. Kim helps infuse risk management in the process of identifying, collecting and analyzing mission essential functions (MEFs) on the Business Process Analysis/Business Impact Analysis (BPA/BIA) process, as proscribed by Federal Continuity Directives 1 and 2. The update and validation of essential functions includes conducting a comprehensive BPA to understand those processes necessary to the performance of organizational functions and requ irements and also includes conducting a BIA to identify potential impacts on the performance of essential functions and the consequences of failure to sustain them.

COVID-19/CARES Act Implementation – Ms. Kim serves as a FEMA lead under the COVID-19 Emergency Presidential Declaration. As a Subject Matter Expert (SME), Ms. Kim aids in managing claims to recover eligible expenses and lost revenues from COVID-19 with primary focus on recoveries from insurance, the CARES Act and FEMA Category B – Emergency Protective Measures. She assists in the development and review of Elements of Essential Information (EEI), Dimension and Description of Damages (DDD) and Scope of Work (SOW) for input into the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA’s) Grants Portal. Ms. Kim also supports the collaboration with healthcare professionals to identify and quantify other available funding sources (e.g. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Private Insurance, and related entities). She collaboratively develops monitoring and compliance approaches intended to assist in maintaining documentation and securing appropriate reimbursement. She is also responsible for project management and driving the key work stream activities and deliverables to meet project objectives.

California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) – Ms. Kim served as a Grants Management Subject Matter Expertise (SME) on HCD’s CDBG and CDBG -DR program funds that were approved by HUD and allocated to the State of California to address unmet long-term recovery needs arising from damage caused by the 2017 wildfires, flooding, mudflows, and debris flows. She was responsible for the grant program requirements, business rules and processes, procedures, and internal controls to support the implementation of the grants management system. She supported the prime contractor through all Project Management Office (PMO) work-stream activities including the Project Implementation Plan, Validated Requirements Report, Gap Analysis and Configuration Plan of the system to match HCD’s workflows.

Florida Division of Emergency Management (DEM) Grants Management (Hurricane Irma) – Ms. Kim serves as the Project Manager responsible for providing comprehensive grants management services for Hurricane Irma (DR-4337) on behalf of the State of Florida and oversees Grant Thornton’s grants management staff. Ms. Kim manages a team of 30+ professionals in their provision of compliance services while guiding Subrecipients through validation, reimbursement, closeout processes and timely deliverables. Ms. Kim manages the workflow of the Recipient Final Review approval for assigned PWs, coordinates the contract execution of subgrant agreements, and conducts the validati on of cost documentation and expense support and reimbursement processes along with quarterly reporting and PW closeouts for small and large projects. Ms. Kim is also responsible for onboarding new team members and oversees the training and procedure process.

City Council
24 –
61 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 51 Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, January 2020 - present  Manager, January 2020 - present
Grant Thornton LLP, August 2018 – December 2019
 Manager, August 2018 – December 2019
CohnReznick LLP, Manager, May 2005 - January 2018

Education and Certifications
B.A., International Studies, Towson University
Institute for Internal Controls – Certified Internal Controls Auditor, CICA

City Council
24 –
62 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 52 Christina Suthammanont , PhD, PMP
Dr. Suthammanont’s Outstanding Qualifications for Program Controls and Standards Supervisor Christina is a Senior Associate in Grant Thornton’s Public Sector Digital Transformation and Management practice. Combined, she has twenty years’ experience in higher education, customer engagement, resource optimization, and workforce analytics. She has led numerous independent and collaborative research projects, from initial literature review and data collection through analysis, reporting, and presenting to both technical and non-technical audiences. Christina has a doctorate (PhD) in quantitative political science and holds certification as a Project Management Professional (PMP).

Relevant Experience
Grant Thornton Public Sector, LLP – Grants Management. Serve as workstream lead for several programs at New Castle County. Lead development of testing plans, risk analysis matrixes, and workpaper and testing templates. Provide thought leadership around position statements and review work products as produced by the team. Coordinate all client-based correspondence and engage with clients to provide briefings and discuss and resolve potential issues. Provide quality assurance and control of team eligibility and compliance testing of expenses claimed under federal funding streams.

Workforce Analytics and Optimization. Provide advisory and analytics support to federal agencies with focus on workforce optimization methods, assessing workforce capacity, and identifying process improvements using a variety of methodological tools and approaches. Perform risk assessment and mitigating strategies as part of grants management project. Contribute to research and development of capabilities within Digital Transformation and Management service line. Demonstrate thought leadership through developing white papers and position statements addressing timely client or environmental issues. Conduct requirements gathering sessions with key stakeholders and subject matter experts.

Collect workforce data via interview, unstructured documents, and structured data resources; assess data quality, cleanse data and prep for analysis; perform data analysis supported by data type and quality; report key findings in executive summary and comprehensive reporting, study documen tation, and knowledge transfer materials in larger report. Identify opportunities for process, data, and workforce improvements with strategic and tactical client benefits. Develop, implement, and analyze compliance and risk assessment instruments
DRT Strategies, Inc. – U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Chief Information Security Officer (OCIO); Cybersecurity Executive Order. Collaborate with ISC leadership to develop and implement strategic cyber security initiative, including Department-wide cybersecurity IT consolidation, in response to OMB Cybersecurity Risk Management Assessment and within NIST Risk Management Plan. Collaborate with stakeholders as Subject Matter Expert on enterprise-wide survey, developing methodology and content to achieve objectives; conduct analysis and reporting. Gather requirements, identify risks and milestones; facilitate communication across multiple working integrated project teams (WIPT), and monitor performance goals while mitigating risks. Mentor professional development of project management skills in fellow colleagues. Provide Service Delivery strategic support with analysis of alternatives, data collection, and analysis. Leverage program building experience to identify and develop corporate strategy for business development. Create and deliver corporate training program and materials to further competitive advantage through providing professional development opportunities.

Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, Senior Associate, June 2019 - present DRT Strategies, Inc., Project Manager and Consultant, February 2018 -June 2019 International Business Machines, Inc. (IBM), Managing Consultant, January 2016 - August 2017 Texas A&M University-San Antonio, Assistant Professor and Program Coordinator, August 2010 - February 2016

City Council
24 –
63 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 53 Education and Certifications
PhD, Quantitative Political Science, Texas A&M University B.A., Political Science, New York University
Project Management Professional (PMP)

City Council
24 –
64 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 54 Khiry Burke
Mr. Burke’s Outstanding Qualifications for Reporting and Data Compliance Supervisor Khiry is a Senior Associate in Grant Thornton’s Public Sector Risk Advisory and Management practice. Mr.

Burke has 5+ years of experience in internal auditing, financial analysis, contracts compliance, federal grant monitoring, project database management, and support of system update/modernization. Khiry has lead teams through the Compliance Monitoring life cycle that resulted in quality deliverable submission.

Relevant Experience
COVID-19 – New Castle County, DE Coronavirus Relief Fund Grant Management – Mr. Burke led a team in the development of New Castle County Office of Finance’s policy and procedures for recording, reconciling, monitoring, and reporting on Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) Fund usage. He conducted interviews with multiple stakeholders within the County to document their processes. Mr. Burke managed a team that resolved potential issues brought forth by the New Castle County’s Internal Audit Department. He assisted in the development of the process to conduct eligibility testing related to Administrative Leave as it pertained to CARES Act Fund usage.

Florida Division of Emergency Management (FDEM) – Mr. Burke was responsible for data migration, Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QAQC) reviews, and Request for Reimbursement (RFR) compliance testing for Grant Thornton’s disaster recovery and grants management engagement. He interacted with system interfaces such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Grants Portal, EMMIE, and Florida PA. He performed cost validations of line items under the regulations of 2 CFR 200 and Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG) to assist subrecipients with the reimbursement process.

Texas Lottery Commission – Contract Compliance Monitoring Services – Mr. Burke performed testing and verification of the client vendor data interface system, compliance financial data reports, and application of software change management. Reviewed software change management practices and documentation to ensure adequate quality assurance testing and client acceptance prior to release of software. Performed detailed testing of contract requirements, which included: verification t hat interfaces were transferred in accordance with the data exchange schedule, accuracy of reporting compliance with service level requirements, software requirement specifications, and data center operations. Executed quarterly testing of primary contract terms for account management and administration including, service management, facilities support services, business continuity, disaster recovery, and training. Developed quarterly testing procedures that addressed high, medium, or low compliance area risks to fully address potential contract related issues. Supported database updates, which contained over 1,000 contract requirements, contract amendments, testing schedules, procedures as well as results/follow -up actions.

Developed weekly reports. Supported Project Manager with resource management, revenue forecasting, and client invoice reviews.

Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) – Enterprise Information Management Strategic Planning Services – Mr. Burke developed the master project schedule through the use of Microsoft Project and monitored progress. Supported the stakeholder interview process of approximately 100 TxDOT employees, which included senior executives. Prepared documents, drafted minutes and conducted analyses. Utilized interview data to develop Tableau Data Visualizations that displayed trend data for additional analysis. Assisted in development of an Enterprise Information Management (EIM) Strategic roadmap, which displayed the proposed timeline of transitioning the department’s legac y systems to an updated system.

Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) – Grants Monitoring – Mr. Burke partnered with FEMA personnel as an agent of the State of Texas Department of Emergency Management for federally declared disasters declarations 4223, 4245, 4255, 4269, and 4272. Supported financial management activities for the State Public Assistance program. Assisted with sub-recipient appeals, reviewed procurement of contracts and examined sub-recipient’s support of eligible costs. Assisted applicants with Federal and State procurement law compliance issues. Managed the project management database by

City Council
24 –
65 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 55 updating and tracking sub-recipient project worksheets as they proceeded through the Public Assistance program. Prepared status reports and assisted in drafting budgets that were submitted to the client.

Facilitated training employees on project management databases and preparation of status reports.

Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, January 2020 - present  Senior Associate, January 2020 - present
Grant Thornton LLP, February 2016 – December 2019
 Senior Associate, August 2018 – December 2019
 Associate, February 2016 – August 2018

Alabama Department of Revenue, Internal Audit, Accountant I, June 2015– February 2016

Education and Certifications
B.S., Business Administration-Accounting, Troy University

City Council
24 –
66 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 56 David Barth, MPA
Mr. Barth’s Outstanding Qualifications for State & Local Grants Compliance Subject Matter Expert
Dave will advise on all requirements of the ARPA/SLFRF award. He has over twenty years of experience with grants and financial management systems and over forty years of experience working with state governments focused on financial management solutions and advisory services. He leads multiple state government engagements supporting disaster recovery activities, FEMA compliance monitoring and CARES Act and ARPA support. He has extensive experience with governmental business operations and is considered a subject matter expert in many fields within the firm. Prior to joining Grant Thornton, he was the Director of Budget and Finance for the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and was responsible for the overall financial management of the Department’s operating budget, federal grant programs and special revenue funding; and negotiating the Department’s indirect cost rate with US Environmental Protection Agency.

Relevant Experience
CalHFA – HRC Mortgage Relief Program – Serves as a Subject Matter Expert providing California Housing Finance Authority (CalHFA) and its subrecipient agency California Homeowners Relief Corporation (HRC) manage the State’s Mortgage Relief Program funded through the ARPA – Homeowners Assistance Fund appropriations representing approximately $1.1 billion. Dave’s specific focus is to provide 2 CFR 200 compliance support and eligibility determinations along with the evaluation of HRC’s Policies and Procedures for federal program compliance.

Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District – Serves as a Subject Matter Expert assisting the District’s with eligibility determinations of its COVID response activities associated with FEMA’s Public Assistance Program. Key aspects of the work involve the coordination between the District, CalOES and FEMA; and the submission on project documentation through FEMA’s Grants Portal.

Marin County – Disaster Cost Recovery – Serves as a Subject Matter Expert supporting the Grant Thornton’s team working with the County to develop its COVID response program including emergency food distribution; non-congregant housing; COVID testing; and vaccine distribution. Key aspects of the work involve the coordination between the County, CalOES and FEMA; the submission on project documentation through FEMA’s Grants Portal; and validating claimed costs within the requirements of 2 CFR 200 and FEMA’s Public Assistance Guide.

New Castle County CRF Subrecipient Monitoring – Serves as the Engagement Director with New Castle County as a direct recipient of CARES Act Coronavirus Relief Fund. His responsibilities serve to support the County with the review of the County program guidance, its system of internal controls, subrecipient risk assessment and subrecipient monitoring and reporting.

Southern California Regional Rail Authority - Metrolink – Served as the Engagement Director and Project Manager supporting Metrolink’s compliance with federal requirements under the CARES Ac t.

Metrolink represents the centralized transportation agency in southern California for Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, Ventura and San Bernardino Counties. The focus of Grant Thornton’s work is the development of funding strategies on the use of CARES Act monies specifically from the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) and FEMA.

COVID - CARES Act Implementation – Served as the Engagement Director for ten different Healthcare – FEMA clients including WellSpan Health, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Grant View Health, Indiana University Health, St. Francis Healthcare System, Geisinger Health, AtlantiCare Health, Beebe Health, Doylestown Hospital and AHRC. His responsibilities included the coordination between Grant Thornton grants management specialists (FEMA) and the commercial healthcare practitioners. The focus of the integrated services was to address healthcare systems’ response to the treatment of COVID patients; compliance with federal requirements and maximizing federal funding through the Provider Relief Fund.

Florida Division of Emergency Management - Serves as the Engagement Director supporting the State of Florida recovery from the impacts of Hurricanes Irma and Michael, monitoring compliance with FEMA

City Council
24 –
67 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 57 requirements and assisting local governments through their recovery process. Responsibilities include the QA/QC review of all assigned Project Worksheets, final approval of subrecipient reimbursement requests, management of technical staff and providing guidance on the project implementation.

Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission (PVSC) - Serves as the Project Manager for Grant Thornton’s contract with the New Jersey Department of Treasury to provide fiscal integrity oversight and compliance monitoring reviews of FEMA funded recovery efforts. The monitoring involves the compliance reviews of PVSC’s financial, administrative and procurement processes; invoice processing and contractual payments; and monthly reporting of 12 engineering and/or construction projects associated with approximately $500 million in recovery and mitigation work.

Texas Department of Public Safety - Served as a Senior Emergency Management Specialist supporting the Texas Division of Emergency Management (TDEM) in their FEMA Public Assistance Program recovering from presidentially declared disasters in 2015 and 2016, providing quality assurance reviews of FEMA Project Worksheets (PW); and authorizing payment approvals as TDEM’s Grant Administrator. Mr. Barth was responsible for the management of Grant Thornton staff assigned to TDEM overseeing the project and account closeouts.

New Jersey Office of Emergency Management (NJOEM) - Served as the Program Manager of Grant Thornton’s contract with the New Jersey Office of Emergency Management (NJOEM) reviewing compliance procedures for small project PWs, developing the required standard operating procedures, and providing a QA/QC review of small project PWs related to the Superstorm Sandy recovery efforts.

Director, Division of Budget and Finance, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection - Responsible for the implementation, execution and management of the Department of Environmental Protection’s (DEP) annual operating and capital budgets including related federal funding. Responsible for the Department’s financial accounting and grants management systems and procurement operations.

Lead the implementation of a Performance Base Budget system integrating programmatic budget needs, strategic directions and financial solutions; developing the schedule, issuing the necessary guidance, overseeing and preparing the required financial analyses of multiple funding options as part of DEP’s annual budget process. Participated on a work team to incorporate Key Performance Indicators into a budget measurement system. Coordinated an internal DEP team to identify multiple state and federal funding sources to address immediate response activities to Hurricane Sandy damage. Developed a management structure to identify, maximize and manage federal funding sources for New Jersey’s Rebuilding and Recovery efforts as they related to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection recovery efforts. Established the process and procedures to ensure the necessary internal controls were in place to oversee the spending and grant compliance conditions during the implementation phases of rebuilding.

Deputy Director, Division of Financial Management, Planning and General Services - Responsible for the financial condition of the Department’s appropriations of General State Funds, Bond Funds, Special Revenue Funds and associated Dedicated Funds. Responsible for the supervision of the Department’s procurement activities. Authorized as a Department’s Fiscal and Budget Officer.

Representative of the Commissioner in financial matters associated with general obligation bonds, authority debt financing and tax reform issues.

Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, Director, January 2020 - present Grant Thornton LLP, Manager, October 2013 – December 2019 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Director of Budget and Finance, September 1995 – June 2013

Education and Certifications
M.P.A., Rider College, Program for Administrators
B.A., U.S. History, Fairfield University

City Council
24 –
68 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 58 Rachel Stushek, CPA
Ms. Stushek’s Outstanding Qualifications for Audit Subject Matter Expert Ms. Stushek has over 17 years of experience providing auditing support to non-profit organizations.

Ms. Stushek has approximately 4 years of experience working with Federal entities. She has experience serving under audits that were performed under Government Accountability Office (GAO) “Yellow Book” auditing standards, American Institute of Public Accountants (AICPA) auditing standards, and OMB Circular A-133/uniform guidance. Rachel leads audit and assurance engagements providing quality assurance role, risk management and serves as a consultative resource for technical questions and issues for various audits, performance audits, and examinations.

Relevant Experience
Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS), Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), Social Security Administration (SSA); Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Air Force Working Capital Fund (AFWCF), Washington Headquarters Services (WHS); U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (ONHIR) – Ms. Stushek has served each of these audit and assurance clients in her role as Professional Practice Director of Grant Thornton’s Public Sector audit practice. In this quality assurance role, she assists in managing risk and serves as a consultative resource for technical questions and issues for various audits, performance audits, and examinations.

Salvation Army Central Territory – Ms. Stushek served this church denomination and social services agency throughout all of her years at Grant Thornton. At various times, she managed the financial statement and single audits of individual operating units in Indianapolis, Kansas City, St. Louis, Chicago, Grand Rapids, the Twin Cities and Omaha. For the last three years, she also directed overall coordination of all ten operating unit audits, and also managed and reviewed the high risk areas of the consolidated audit of the Salvation Army Central Territory. The operating unit audits were performed under GAO “Yellow Book” auditing standards as well as AICPA auditing standards, and the consolidated audit was performed under AICPA auditing standards.

Work History
Grant Thornton LLP, July 2009 - present
 Managing Director, August 2019 - present
 Director, August 2014 - July 2019
 Manager, August 2010 - July 2014
 Senior Associate, July 2009 - July 2010

Deloitte & Touche LLP, July 2003 - June 2009
 Senior Associate, August 2006 - June 2009
 Associate, July 2003 - July 2006

Education and Certifications
Bachelor of Science, Accounting, Grove City College
Certified Public Accountant, Virginia and Illinois

City Council
24 –
69 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 59 Susanna Koo
Ms. Koo’s Outstanding Qualifications for Cross-Functional Expertise Support Susanna is a Senior Associate at Grant Thornton’s Public Sector Los Angeles office with over 3 years of professional management consulting experience. Ms. Koo has led projects and teams to success utilizing strategic business planning. She has a strong ability to support all business functions and prioritize tasks to execute project deliverables.

Relevant Experience
COVID-19 – New Castle County, DE Coronavirus Relief Fund - Ms. Koo evaluated and processed more than 50 Subrecipient applications. She reviews the Subrecipient’s supporting documentation in compliance with the US Treasury’s Coronavirus Relief Fund guidance for eligible costs to be reimbursed.

Los Angeles World Airport (LAWA) – Project Administrator - Prepare, update and distribute meeting minutes, risk log, action item log, issue log and decision log. Provide meeting highlights to Project Manager for decision. Schedule and attend project status and technical meetings. Login and distribute record of submittals and Request for Information (RFIs). Assist and manage with the Project Manager for cost control throughout the task orders initiation and procedure.

Harley Ellis Devereaux, Project Administrative Assistant - Support the Project Management team and Studio Leaders with quality, and confidentiality, quickly manage risk issues, create work plan for wallboards, schedule budget impacts, and ensure issues are corrected. Perform administrative functions, including calendar management, scan and copy documents, review contracts , reports, manage budgets, and create letters of transmittals, meeting minutes, agendas, and attendance record. Prepare for meetings/events, manage project schedules, and assist in strategic planning utilizing WebEx, GoToMeeting, and Outlook, and distribute to relevant teams. Collaborate on multiple projects during Construction Document Phase, review all RFCs/RFIs/Submittals/Sketch log through Newforma system, and coordinate with Senior Project Architects from conception to completion. Create Budget Analyst reports/summaries for Senior Project Managers, throughout the project lifecycle for the evaluation of project performance. Act as the main contact for General Contractors, Owner Representatives, Consultants, and Operation Teams for schematic design, design development, construction administration and any project related items.

Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, January 2020 - present  Senior Associate, August 2020 – present
 Associate, January 2020 – July 2020
Grant Thornton LLP, Associate, October 2018 – December 2019 Los Angeles World Airport, Project Administrator, Jan 2018 – Mar 2021 Harley Ellis Devereaux, Project Administrative Assistant, Jan 2014 – Jan 2018

Education and Certifications
B.A., Economics, University of Southern California

City Council
24 –
70 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 60 Eric Fey
Mr. Fey’s Outstanding Qualifications for Cross-Functional Expertise Support Eric is an adaptable professional applying general government experience in the public sector while located in our Sacramento office. Eric demonstrates proven talent for analyzing problems using data, developing, and simplifying procedural improvements and operations design. He has developed a particularly strong understanding of the following areas: technical report research, writing and editing, statistical Analysis, and project management.

Relevant Experience
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC - Specialization in grant subrecipient monitoring and compliance for disaster relief funding. Assist with Coronavirus Relief Fund reimbursement procedures and interpret US Treasury Department guidelines for New Castle County, DE. Expedite Golden Gate Bridge District’s Request for Public Assistance for Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursement of all eligible costs under Category B.

Federal Emergency Management Agency - Provide focused Senior Leadership Briefings to FEMA Region IX Administrator and National Watch Office tracking California’s daily response efforts in response to COVID-19. Interface with state and federal partners to determine information requirements within the Incident Command Structure. Conduct research related to a broad range of response topics from state organization, medical & safety developments and data analytics.

Florida State University - Research for the Leroy Collins Institute “Better Choices: Evidence-based policymaking techniques could improve Florida’s outcomes for delivery of human services programming.

Served as Public Administration Graduate Association Vice President.

Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, Associate, April 2021 - present Federal Emergency Management Agency, Situation Unit Lead, July 2020 - January 2021 Florida State University, Research and Teaching Graduate Assistant, August 2019 - present

Education and Certifications
M.P.A., Florida State University, Projected December 2021 Bachelor of Public Policy Administration in Public Management, James Madison University

City Council
24 –
71 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 61 Tim Luzano
Mr. Fey’s Outstanding Qualifications for Senior Compliance Specialist Mr. Luzano is a Manager with Grant Thornton Public Sector, LLC. He is an accomplished data management practitioner overseeing engagements regarding data governance, data quality, and data integration. Mr. Luzano is also an accomplished finance professional with demonstrated ability performing financial analysis including, but not limited to Income Statement analysis, Budgeting, Forecasting, and Cost Planning. Mr. Luzano has extensive Public Sector experience working with Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), and Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT).

Relevant Experience
Grant Thornton, Utah Department of Transportation – Grant Thornton is currently working with the Utah DOT to implement an open data and business intelligence platform to provide them with an analytical, reporting and dashboard management tool that provides transparency and actionable information. This solution provides an integrated data storage, ETL and data visualization platform used to facilitate functions with the agency and enables personnel at UDOT to perform their jobs more efficiently.

Texas Department of Transportation – Grant Thornton was hired to provide TxDOT with EIM strategic planning services including the development of an information management strategy and a 10- year implementation roadmap to modernize TxDOT’s data management and analytics platform, as well as the supporting projects and programs needed to help make such a platform successful.

Hawaii Department of Transportation – Grant Thornton is working to implement an open data and BI platform for the Hawaii Department of Transportation in order to deliver actionable insights to stakeholders throughout the agency using up-to-date, accurate data through a series of dashboards and reports hosted on the cloud-based data portal. Grant Thornton’s efforts with HDOT include process automation, data transformation, custom report development work and collaborating with leadership to design and track Key Performance Indicators for the organization (KPIs). The entire engagement operates using agile project management under which requirements and solutions evolve through the collaborative effort of self-organizing and cross-functional teams and their customer/end user.

Work History
Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, Manager, Aug 2018 - present Sears Holdings Corporation, Manager Reporting and Analytics, Nov 2015 – Feb 2017 Brown-Forman, Senior Financial Analyst, June 2013 – June 2015 Humana, Financial Analyst, June 2009 – June 2013
McCauley, Nicolas, and Company, Staff Accountant, Nov 2008 – May 2009 General Electric, Financial Services Representative, May 2006 – Oct 2008 Education and Certifications
M.S., Business Analytics, University of Notre Dame
M.B.A., Indiana University
B.S., Accounting, Indiana University
Certified Data Management Professional (CDMP)
Project Management Professional (PMP)
Certified Scrum Master (CSM)

5.0 References
Grant Thornton’s references are included in section 4.1 References.

City Council
24 –
72 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 62 6.0 Evidence of Financial Capacity
Grant Thornton, if awarded a contract, will provide requested evidence of financial capacity.

City Council
24 –
73 12/20/2022

Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC City of Santa Ana | RFQ 21- 093 Revised Proposal
Use or disclosure of data contained on this sheet is subject to the restriction on the title page of this proposal or quotation. 63 7.0 Insurance
Grant Thornton maintains professional liability insurance and general commercial liability insurance coverage for the provision of accounting and advisory services. The insurance coverage and limits are consistent with other national accounting firms of its size. Upon acceptance of Grant Thornton’s proposal to provide services, and upon request, Grant Thornton will provide the City verification of professional liability insurance and/or a certificate of general commercial liability insurance. Grant Thornton does not provide copies of its insurance policies to third parties. [NOTE: SEE SECTION 2.6 FOR WARRANT OF ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANCE]

City Council
24 –
74 12/20/2022

GT.COM
This proposal is the work of Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC, the U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd, and is in all respects subject to negotiation, agreement, and signing of specific contracts. The information contained within this document is intended only for the entity or person to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or proprietary material. Dissemination to third-parties, copying, or use of this information is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC.

“Grant Thornton” refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL) and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity.

Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions.

Tax Professional Standards Statement
This document supports Grant Thornton LLP’s marketing of professional services, and is not written tax advice directed at the particular facts and circumstances of any person. If you are interested in the subject of this document we encourage you to contact us or an independent tax advisor to discuss the potential application to your particular situation.

Nothing herein shall be construed as imposing a limitation on any person from disclosing the tax treatment or tax structure of any matter addressed herein. To the extent this document may be considered to contain written tax advice, any written advice contained in, forwarded with, or attached to this document is not intended by Grant Thornton to be used, and cannot be used, by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

©2020 Grant Thornton Public Sector LLC | All rights reserved | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Grant Thornton LLP

City Council
24 –
75 12/20/2022

EXHIBIT B

City Council
24 –
76 12/20/2022

1 FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS
During the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the federal contract provisions in this Exhibit.

1. REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPENDIX II TO PART 200 – CONTRACT PROVISIONS FOR NON-FEDERAL ENTITY CONTRACTS UNDER FEDERAL AWARDS (2 C.F.R. § 200.327)
(a) Appendix II to Part 200 (A); Appendix II to Part 200 (B): Remedies for Breach; Termination for Cause/Convenience. The Contract Documents include remedies for breach and termination for cause and convenience.
(b) Appendix II to Part 200 (C) – Equal Employment Opportunity: If this Agreement meets the definition of a “federal assisted construction contract” in 41 CFR § 60-1.3, Consultant agrees as follows during the performance of this Agreement:
(i) The Consultant will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for tra ining, including apprenticeship. The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause.
(ii) The Consultant will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the Consultant, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin.
(iii) The Consultant will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensat ion of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, includ ing an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the Consultant's legal duty to furnish information. (iv) The Consultant will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the Consultant's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment.

City Council
24 –
77 12/20/2022

2 (v) The Consultant will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (vi) The Consultant will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders.
(vii) In the event of the Consultant's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this Agreement or with any of t he said rules, regulations, or orders, this Agreement may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the Consultant may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law.
(viii) The Consultant will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (i) and the provisions of paragraphs (i) through (vii) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The Consultant will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance:

Provided, however, that in the event the Consultant becomes involved in, or is threatened with, litigation with a subcontractor or vendor as a result of such direction by the administering agency, the Consultant may request the United States to enter into such litigation to protect the interests of the United States.

The City further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work:

Provided, That if the City so participating is a State or local government, the above equal opportunity clause is not app licable to any agency, instrumentality or subdivision of such government which does not participate in work on or under the Agreement.

The City agrees that it will assist and cooperate actively with the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor in ob taining the compliance of the Consultant and subcontractors with the equal opportunity clause and the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor, that it will furnish the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor such informati on as they may require for the supervision of such compliance, and that it will otherwise assist the administering agency in the discharge of the agency's primary responsibility for securing compliance.

The City further agrees that it will refrain from e ntering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, with a contractor debarred from, or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, Government contracts and federally assisted construction

City Council
24 –
78 12/20/2022

3 contracts pursuant to the Executive Order and will carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors and subcontractors by the administering agency or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II , Subpart D of the Executive Order. In addition, the City agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings, the administering agency may take any or all of the following actions: cancel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part the grant (contract, loan, insurance, guarantee) for this project; refrain from extending any further assistance to the applicant under the program with respect to which the failure or refund occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been rec eived from such applicant; and refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.
(c) Appendix II to Part 200 (D) – Davis-Bacon Act: Not applicable to this Agreement since it is funded by CSLFRF.
(d) Appendix II to Part 200 (D) – Copeland “Antti-Kickback” Act: Not applicable to this Agreement since it is funded by CSLFRF.
(e) Appendix II to Part 200 (E) – Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act:
(i) Overtime Requirements. No contractor or subcontractor contracting for any part of the co ntract work which may require or involve the employment of laborers or mechanics shall require or permit any such laborer or mechanic in any workweek in which he or she is employed on such work to work in excess of forty hours in such workweek unless such laborer or mechanic receives compensation at a rate not less than one and one -half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of forty hours in such workweek. (ii) Violation; liability for unpaid wages; liquidated damages. In the event of any violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (ii) of this section the Consultant and any subcontractor responsible therefor shall be liable for the unpaid wages. In addition, such contractor and subcontractor shall be liable to the United States (in the case of work done under contract for the District of Columbia or a territory, to such District or to such territory), for liquidated damages. Such liquidated damages shall be computed with respect to each individual laborer or mechanic, including watchmen and guards, employed in violation of the clause set forth in paragraph (ii) of this section, in the sum of $10 for each calendar day on which such individual was required or permitted to work in excess of the standard workweek of forty hours without payment of the overtime wages required by the clause set forth in paragraph (ii) of this section. (iii) Withholding for unpaid wages and liquidated damages. The City shall upon its own action or upon written request of an authorized representative of the Department of Labor withhold or cause to be withheld, from any moneys payable on account of work performed by the Consultant or subcontractor under any such c ontract or any other Federal contract with the Consultant, or any other federally -assisted contract subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, which is held by the Consultant, such sums as may be determined to be necessary to satisfy any liabilities of Consultant or subcontractor for unpaid wages and liquidated damages as provided in the clause set forth in paragraph (iii) of this section. (iv) Subcontracts. The Consultant or subcontractor shall insert in any subcontracts the clauses set forth in paragraph (ii) through (v) of this Section and also a clause requiring the subcontractors to include these clauses in any lower tier subcontracts. The

City Council
24 –
79 12/20/2022

4 Consultant shall be responsible for compliance by any subcontractor or lower tier subcontractor with the clauses set forth in paragraphs (ii) through (v) of this Section. (f) Appendix II to Part 200 (F) – Rights to Inventions Made Under a Contract or Agreement: If the Federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 CFR § 401.2 (a) and the Consultant wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the Consultant must comply with the requirements of 37 CFR Part 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency.. (g) Appendix II to Part 200 (G) – Clean Air Act and Federal Water Pollution Control Act:
(i) Pursuant to the Clean Air Act, (1) Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., (2) Consultant agrees to report each violation to the City and understands and agrees that the City will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal awarding agency and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office, and (3) Consultant agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000.
(ii) Pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, (1) Consultant agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., (2) Consultant agrees to report each violation to the City and understands and agrees that the City will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal awarding agency and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office, and (3) Consultant agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000.
(h) Appendix II to Part 200 (H) – Debarment and Suspension:
(i) This Agreement is a covered transaction for purposes of 2 C.F.R. pt. 180 and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000. As such Consultant is required to verify that none of the Consultant, its principals (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.995), or its affiliates (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.905) are excluded (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.940) or disqualified (defined at 2 C.F.R. § 180.935). (ii) Consultant must comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C and must include a requirement to comply with these regulations in any lower tier covered transaction it enters into.
(iii) This certification is a material representation of f act relied upon by City. If it is later determined that Consultant did not comply with 2 C.F.R. pt. 180, subpart C and 2 C.F.R. pt. 3000, subpart C, in addition to remedies available to the City, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including but not limited to suspension and/or debarment. (iv) Consultant warrants that it is not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in any federal programs. Consultant also agrees to verify that all subcontractors performing work under this Agreement are not debarred, disqualified,

City Council
24 –
80 12/20/2022

5 or otherwise prohibited from participation in accordance with the requirements above. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in writing immediately if Consultant or its subcontractors are not in compliance during the term of this Agreement.
(i) Appendix II to Part 200 (I) – Byrd Anti-Lobbying Act: Contractors that apply or bid for an award exceeding $100,000 must file the required certification. Each tier certifies to the tier above that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non -Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the recipient who in turn will forward the certification(s) to the awarding agency. (j) Appendix II to Part 200 (J) – §200.323 Procurement of Recovered Materials:
(i) Consultant shall comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 C.F.R. part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement. (ii) In the performance of this Agreement, the Consultant shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired: competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule; meeting contract performance requirements; or at a reasonable price. (iii) Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA -designate items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines web site, https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. (iv) The Consultant also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.” (k) Appendix II to Part 200 (K) – §200.216 Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment:
(i) Consultant shall not contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system funded under this Agreement. As described in Public Law 115–232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment is telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (1) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications

City Council
24 –
81 12/20/2022

6 Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities).
(2) Telecommunications or video survei llance services provided by such entities or using such equipment.
(3) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligenc e or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country.
(ii) See Public Law 115-232, section 889 for additional information. (l) Appendix II to Part 200 (L) – §200.322 Domestic Preferences for Procurement:
(i) Consultant shall, to the greatest extent practicable, purchase, acquire, or use goods, products, or materials produced in the United States (including but not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products). The requirements of this sectio n must be included in all subcontracts.
(ii) For purposes of this section:
(1) “Produced in the United States’’ means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States.
(2) ‘‘Manufactured products’’ means items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of nonferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, in cluding optical fiber; and lumber.

2. CONTRACTING WITH SMALL AND MINORITY FIRMS, WOMEN’S BUSINESS ENTERPRISE AND LABOR SURPLUS AREA FIRMS (2 C.F.R. § 200.321) (a) Consultant shall be subject to 2 C.F.R. § 200.321 and will take affirmative steps to assure that minority firms, women’s business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, religious creed, sex, or national origin in consideration for an award.
(b) Affirmative steps shall include:
(i) Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists;
(ii) Assuring that small and minority businesses, an d women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; (iii) Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority business, and women's business enterprises;

City Council
24 –
82 12/20/2022

7 (iv) Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority business, and women's business enterprises; and (v) Using the services/assistance of the Small Business Administration (SBA), and the Minority Business Development Agency (MBDA) of the Department of Commerce. (c) Consultant shall submit evidence of compliance with the foregoing affirmative steps when requested by the City.

3. COMPLIANCE WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY CORONAVIRUS

LOCAL FISCAL RECOVERY FUND AWARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS
(a) Maintenance of and Access to Records. Consultant shall maintain records and financial documents sufficient to evidence compliance with section 603(c) of the Act, Treasury’s regulations implementing that section, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing.

Consultant agrees to provide the City, Treasury Office of Inspector General and the Government Accountability Office, or any of their authorized representatives access to any books, documents, papers, and records (electronic an otherwise) of the Consultant which are directly pertinent to this Agreement for the purposes of conducting audits or other investigations. Records shall be maintained by Consultant for a period of five (5) years after completion of the Project. (b) Compliance with Federal Regulations. Consultant agrees to comply with the requirements of section 603 of the Act, regulations adopted by Treasury pursuant to section 603(f) of the Act, and guidance issued by Treasury regarding the foregoing. Consultant also agrees to comply with all other applicable federal statutes, regulations, and executive orders, including, without limitation, the following:
(i) Universal Identifier and System for Award Management (SAM), 2 C.F.R.

Part 25, pursuant to which the award term set forth in Appendix A to 2 C.F.R. Part 25 is hereby incorporated by reference.
(ii) Reporting Subaward and Executive Compensation Information, 2 C.F.R.

Part 170, pursuant to which the award term set forth in Appendix A to 2 C.F.R. Part 170 is hereby incorporated by reference.
(iii) OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government -wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), 2 C.F.R. Part 180, including the requirement to include a term or condition in all lower tier covered transactions (contracts and subcontracts described in 2 C.F.R.

Part 180, subpart B) that the award is subject to 2 C.F.R. Part 180 and Treasury’s implementing regulation at 31 C.F.R. Part 19.
(iv) Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters, pursuant to which the award term set forth in 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Appendix XII to Part 200 is hereby incorporated by reference. (v) Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace, 31 C.F.R. Part

20. (vi) New Restrictions on Lobbying, 31 C.F.R. Part 21. (vii) Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4601-4655) and implementing regulations.

City Council
24 –
83 12/20/2022

8 (c) Compliance with Federal Statutes and Regulations Prohibiting Discrimination.

Consultant agrees to comply with statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination applicable to the CSLFRF program including, without limitation, the following:
(i) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d et seq.) and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 22, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin under programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance.
(ii) The Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination in housing on the basis of race, col or, religion, national origin, sex, familial status, or disability.
(iii) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.
(iv) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101 et seq.), and Treasury’s implementing regulations at 31 C.F.R. Part 23, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving federal financial assistance. (v) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability under programs, activities, and services provided or made available by state and loca l governments or instrumentalities or agencies thereto.
(d) False Statements. Consultant understands that making false statements or claims in connection with the CSLFRF program is a violation of federal law and may result in criminal, civil, or administrativ e sanctions, including fines, imprisonment, civil damages and penalties, debarment from participating in federal awards or contracts, and/or any other remedy available by law.
(e) Protections for Whistleblowers.
(i) In accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 4712, Consultant may not discharge, demote, or otherwise discriminate against an employee in reprisal for disclosing to any of the list of persons or entities provided below, information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a federal contract or grant, a gross waste of federal funds, an abuse of authority relating to a federal contract or grant, a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a federal contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or grant. (ii) The list of persons and entities referenced in the paragraph above includes the following:
(1) A member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress;
(2) An Inspector General;
(3) The Government Accountability Office;

City Council
24 –
84 12/20/2022

9 (4) A Treasury employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management;
(5) An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency;
(6) A court or grand jury; or
(7) A management official or other emplo yee of Consultant, or a subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct. (f) Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States. Pursuant to Executive Order 13043, 62 FR 19217 (Apr. 18, 1997), Consultant is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt policies and programs for their employees when operating company-owned, rented or personally owned vehicles, and encourage its subcontractors to do the same (g) Reducing Text Messaging While Driving. Pursuant to Executive Order 13513, 74 FR 51225 (Oct. 6, 2009), Consultant should encourage its employees and subcontractors to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving, and Consultant should establish workplace safety policies to decrease accidents caused by distracted drivers. (h) Assurances of Compliance with Civil Rights Requirements. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 provides that the provisions of this assurance apply to the Project, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i) Consultant ensures its current and future compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, which prohibits exclusion from participation, denial of the benefits of, or subjection to discrimination under programs and activities receiving federal funds, of any person in the United States on the ground of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by the Department of the Treasury Title VI regulations at 31 CFR Part 22 and other pertinent executive orders such as Executive Order 13166; directives; circulars; policies; memoranda and/or guidance documents.
(ii) Consultant acknowledges that Executive Order 13166, “Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP),” seeks to improve access to federally assisted programs and activities for individuals who, because of national origin, are limited in their English proficiency. Consultant understands that the denial of access to persons to its programs, services and activities because of their limited proficiency in English is a form of national origin discrimination prohibited under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Accordingly, Consultant shall initiate reasonable steps, or comply with Treasury’s directives, to ensure meaningful access to its programs, services and activities to LEP persons. Consultant understands and agrees that meaningful access may entail providing language assistance services, including oral interpretation and written translation where necessary to ensure effective communication in the Project.
(iii) Consultant agrees to consider the need for language services for LEP persons during development of applicable budgets and when conducting programs, services and activities. As a resource, the Department of the Treasury has published its LEP guidance at 70 FR 6067. For more information on LEP, please visit http://www.lep.gov.

City Council
24 –
85 12/20/2022

10 (iv) Consultant acknowledges and agrees that compliance with this assurance constitutes a condition of continued receipt of federal financial assistance and is binding upon Consultant and Consultant’s successors, transferees and assignees for the period in which such assistance is provided.
(v) Consultant agrees to incorporate the following language in every contract or agreement subject to Title VI and its regulations between the Consultant and the Consultant’s subcontractors, successors, transferees and assignees:

The subcontractor, successor, transferee and assignee shall comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal financial assistance from excluding from a program or activity, denying benefits of, or otherwise discri minating against a person on the basis of race, color, or national origin (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.), as implemented by Department of the Treasury Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this con tract (or agreement). Title VI also extends protection to persons with “Limited English proficiency” in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., as implemented by Department of the Treasury Title VI regulations, 31 CFR Part 22, which are herein incorporated by reference and made a part of this contract (or agreement).
(vi) Consultant understands and agrees that if any real property or structure is provided or improved with the aid of federal financial assistanc e by the Department of the Treasury, this assurance obligates the Consultant, or in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property or structure is used for a purpose for which the federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. If any personal property is provided, this assurance obligates the Consultant for the period during which it retains ownership or possession of the property. (vii) Consultant shall cooperate in any enforcement or compliance review activities by the Department of the Treasury of the aforementioned obligations. Enforcement may include investigation, arbitration, mediation, litigation, and monitoring of any settlement agreements that may result from these actions. Consultant shall comply with information requests, on-site compliance reviews, and reporting requirements. (viii) Consultant shall maintain a complaint log and inform the Department of the Treasury of any accusations of discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, and limited English proficiency covered by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and implem enting regulations and provide, upon request, a list of all such reviews or proceedings based on the complaint, pending or completed, including outcome. Consultant must also inform the Department of the Treasury if Consultant has received no complaints under Title VI. (ix) Consultant must provide documentation of an administrative agency’s or court’s findings of non-compliance of Title VI and efforts to address the non-compliance, including any voluntary compliance or other agreements between the Consultant and the administrative agency that made the finding. If the Consultant settles a case or matter alleging such discrimination, Consultant must provide documentation of the settlement. If Consultant has not been the subject of any court or administrative agency finding of discrimination, please so state.

If Consultant makes sub-awards to other agencies or other entities, Consultant is responsible for assuring that sub-recipients also comply with Title VI and all of the applicable authorities covered in this assurance.

City Council
24 –
86 12/20/2022

Exhibit 1 Agreement_Guidehouse - ARPA
Consulting Services_FINAL_12.2.22
Final Audit Report 2022-12-05
Created: 2022-12-05
By: Kristin Andrade ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAA5AMgfhiALUGqthjaI1avVepNizh0Q64o "Exhibit 1 Agreement_Guidehouse - ARPA Consulting Services_ FINAL_12.2.22" History
Document created by Kristin Andrade ([email protected]) 2022-12-05 - 10:38:49 PM GMT- IP address: 98.153.69.210 Document emailed to Kathryn Downs ([email protected]) for signature 2022-12-05 - 10:39:16 PM GMT
Email viewed by Kathryn Downs ([email protected])
2022-12-05 - 10:52:39 PM GMT- IP address: 174.87.135.210 Document e-signed by Kathryn Downs ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2022-12-05 - 10:53:15 PM GMT - Time Source: server- IP address: 174.87.135.210 Agreement completed.
2022-12-05 - 10:53:15 PM GMT

City Council
24 –
87 12/20/2022

Finance and Management Services
www.santa-ana.org/finance
Item # 25
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
December 20, 2022
TOPIC: Approve an agreement with Questica Software Ltd. for citywide budget management software
AGENDA TITLE:

Approve an Agreement with Questica Software Ltd. in an Amount not to Exceed $231,804 for Maintenance and Support of Citywide Budget Management Software (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Questica, Inc. for the maintenance and support of Citywide Budget Management Software for a three-year term beginning January 16, 2023 through January 15, 2026, for an amount not to exceed $231,804 subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and the City Attorney.

DISCUSSION
On January 16, 2018, the City entered into an agreement with Questica Software Ltd. to implement a citywide budget software system (“Questica”). This agreement expires on January 15, 2023. The implementation of Questica in 2018 resulted in enhanced reporting capabilities, automation of the workflow process for both the operating and capital budgets, and a seamless integration with the City’s financial and payroll systems.

Additionally, Questica provides customized reports used to publish and print the annual budget book and the OpenBook feature. Questica’s OpenBook promotes community engagement and transparency by presenting financial data in simple charts and graphs on the City’s website. Currently, OpenBook is used to publish actual revenues and expenditures across multiple budget years and a Vendor Payment Register which is a summary of checks, ACH, and wire payments issued by the City.

Under the new agreement, the City expanded the capabilities of both the Operating and Capital Modules at a discounted rate by Questica. The new features include:
•Increasing the number of licensed users from 50 to unlimited. •Utilizing OpenBook to publish Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project information, Revive Santa Ana data, maps, business license data and more.

City Council
25 –
1 12/20/2022

3 1
2 4
•Adding customized reports to enhance the tracking and reporting of capital project data.

If the agreement is approved by City Council, staff anticipates incorporating these added features during the FY2023-24 budget cycle.

Each of these features were added at a discounted rate by Questica, in exchange for entering into a three-year agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for FY 2022-23 through FY 2024-25 will be budgeted and available in the Management and Support Services account (01110100-62300) as follows:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit-
Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description
Amount
FY22-23 01110100-62300 General
Fund
FMSA- Management &
Support, Contract
Services
$83,934.67*
FY23-24 01110100-62300 General
Fund
FMSA- Management &
Support, Contract
Services
$73,934.67
FY24-25 01110100-62300 General
Fund
FMSA- Management &
Support, Contract
Services
$73,934.67
Contract Total $231,804
*Costs are higher in Year 1 due to the one-time cost associated with the addition and installation of unlimited licenses.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Maintenance and Support Agreement

2. Exception to Competitive Bidding Process
Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, FMSA Executive Director
Approved By: Kristine Ridge, City Manager

City Council
25 –
2 12/20/2022

1 | P a g e

QUESTICA BUDGET MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT
and entered into this 20th day
of December, 2022 by and between QUESTICA SOFTWARE LTD., a corporation incorporated under the Questica
subdivisions, departments, and constituent entities within its legal scope and jurisdiction (collectively, the Licensee

BACKGROUND

1. On January 16, 2018, Questica and Licensee entered into a License and Services Agreement #A-2018-006.

2. Questica is the exclusive provider of Maintenance and Support Services for the Questica Budget product solution.

3. The Licensee wishes to receive Maintenance and Support Services for the licensed products, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

4. The Licensee wishes to receive Unlimited Licenses for the licensed products, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration (the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged), Questica Parties Party

1. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE. All terms from the original License and Services Agreement and any subsequent changes or amendments remain in full force unless specifically addressed within this Maintenance and Support Agreement.

2. PERMITTED USE. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, Questica hereby grants to Licensee a perpetual, personal, revocable, non-transferable and non-exclusive license to use the Software, solely in executable code format, and the Documentation provided therewith, solel internal business purposes exclusively within the facilities and sites within the jurisdiction of the Licensee. If Licensee wishes to use the Software at or from an additional site or sites outside of its jurisdiction, Licensee agrees
Software and the Documentation is limited to those rights expressly set out herein. Licensee shall not use the Software, in whole or in part, on behalf of or for the benefit of any other Person, including an affiliate of the Licensee, except as expressly provided herein.

2.1. PERSONNEL WORK-AT-HOME RIGHTS.
may use the Software from their homes as an extension of the license granted to the Licensee, for business related purposes. Licensee personnel may not use the Software at home for personal purposes. For greater clarity, Licensee shall be responsible for the use of Questica by Exhibit 1

City Council
25 –
3 12/20/2022

2 | P a g e
any contractors, including any actions of omissions of such contractors, as though they were employees of Licensee. Licensee shall promptly deny access to the Software to (a) any employee or contractor who is no longer employed by License; or (b) any staff member would not normally require the use of the Software in the at-work environment. 2.2. PERMITTED CUSTOMIZATIONS. Questica also grants the Licensee a non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, non-code components of the Software solely for internal use and is custom software or reports which are developed that access or interact with the Software or its associated database(s). The Licensee may only create Permitted Customizations that do not require the source code of the Software to create the Permitted Customizations. Independently, Questica is continually innovating and improving the Software to meet the needs of its customers. The Licensee acknowledges that, while it has the ability to create its own Permitted Customizations, Questica must not be prevented from continuing to develop and enhance its software in any respect, even if such modifications may be similar to the Permitted Customizations in functionality, appearance or otherwise. Questica retains the right to (i) develop any modifications which may be similar to the Permitted Customizations; and (ii) integrate any or all of such modifications into its core product. 2.3. RESTRICTIONS ON USE. Except as set forth herein, Licensee shall (a) not copy the Software except to copy it onto the site computers being used by Licensee and to make copies of the Software solely for backup, training, disaster recovery or testing purposes; (b) not copy any of the Documentation for any use outside the site; (c) not assign this Agreement or transfer, lease, export or grant a sub-Licensee of the Work or the license contained herein to any Person or organization except as and when authorized to do so by Questica in writing; (d) not reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the Software; (e) not use the Work except as authorized herein; (f) take such precautions with respect to the Software, as it would take to protect its own includes an individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, unincorporated organization, the Crown or any agency or instrumentality thereof or any other judicial entity recognized by law. 3. OWNERSHIP AND COPYRIGHT. Questica is the owner of all intellectual property rights in the Work, related written materials, logos, names and other support materials provided pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. No title to the intellectual property in the Work or in any magnetic media or other physical media provided therewith is transferred to the Licensee by this Agreement. Questica shall defend Licensee against any claim that the Work infringes a patent, copyright, trade-mark or other intellectual property right of any third party and Questica will pay resulting cost, damages and reasonable legal fees finally awarded, provided that i) Licensee promptly notifies Questica in writing of the claim; and ii) Questica has sole control of the defense and all related settlement negotiations.

City Council
25 –
4 12/20/2022

3 | P a g e
mit Questica at its option and expense, either to procure for Licensee the right to continue using the Work or to replace or modify the same so that it becomes non-infringing without loss of functionality. Questica shall have no obligation to defend Licensee or to pay costs, damages or legal fees for any claim based upon use of other than a current unaltered release of the Work, if such infringement would have been avoided by the use of a current unaltered release thereof. The foregoing states the entire obligations of Questica with respect to infringement or proprietary or intellectual rights of third parties. 4. LIMITED WARRANTY. Questica warrants that so long as Product Maintenance and Support services are provided by Questica, that the Software, when properly installed, will perform substantially in accordance with the accompanying written materials. If the Software does not so perform during such period, Questica will correct, at no cost to Licensee, programming errors in the Software to make the Software so perform provided that i) the Software has been properly used by the Licensee in accordance with the documentation furnished by Questica to Licensee in connection therewith; ii) Licensee notifies Questica of the programming errors and describes the nature of the suspected errors and of the circumstances in which they occur; iii) Questica, using reasonable efforts, is able to confirm the existence of the programming errors; and iv) Licensee or any third party has not changed or modified the Software. Licensee agrees that Questica shall not be liable to the Licensee or any other person, regardless of the cause, for the effectiveness or accuracy of the Software, the Documentation or any other related materials, or for any other special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising from or occasioned by the use of the Software, the Documentation or the related materials, or the failure or omission on the part of Questica to comply with its obligations under this Agreement. The Licensee hereby agreethe Software, the Documentation or any related materials (whether in contract, tort, including negligence, product liability or otherwise) shall not exceed the total Maintenance and Support fees paid by the Licensee. THE ABOVE EXPRESS WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS (EXPRESS AND IMPLIED) AND THOSE ARISING BY STATUTE OR OTHERWISE IN LAW OR FROM A COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABLE QUALITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. NO OTHER WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS EXPRESS OR IMPLIED ARE GIVEN. 5. LIMITATIONS OF REMEDIES AND DAMAGES. Subject to Section 10 hereof, entire liability Limited Warranty, to require Questica to replace any defective media or to correct any defects and make any modifications which are necessary to cause the Software to confirm in all material respects to the Documentation; or ii) the termination of this agreement. In the event of any such termination, Questica shall not be liable in the aggregate for any damages which exceed the amount paid hereunder by the Licensee to Questica as Maintenance and Support Fees. In no event, shall Questica be liable for indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

City Council
25 –
5 12/20/2022

4 | P a g e

6. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. In the event of any dispute arising out of or relating to and/or in connection all use every reasonable effort to resolve such dispute in good faith within ten (10) business days. If the project managers have failed to resolve the dispute within such time frame, then the dispute shall be escalated to the next escalation level. At each escalation level, the designated executives shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the dispute. Escalation Level Questica Management Licensee Management Period of Resolution Efforts First Level Customer Success Associate Project Manager 10 business days Second Level Customer Success Manager Finance Department Manager 10 business days Third Level President Director of Finance or Treasurer 10 business days 7. IRREPERABLE HARM. Licensee acknowledges and agrees with Questica that the breach by it of any of the provisions of Sections 1- 4, 8 or 10 of this Agreement would cause serious harm to Questica which could not adequately be compensated for in damages and in the event of a breach by Licensee of any of such provisions, Licensee understands that an injunction may be issued against it restraining it from any further breach of such provisions, but such actions shall not be construed so as to be in derogation of any other remedy which Questica may have in the event of such breach. 8. TERMS OF SERVICE. Terms, provisions, or conditions on any purchase order, acknowledgement, or other business form or writing that Customer may use in connection with the provision of Services (or software) by Questica will have no effect on the rights, duties, or obligations of the parties hereunder, regardless of any failure of Questica to object to such terms, provisions, or conditions. 9. FEES. Licensee agrees to pay the fees as specified in Appendix A. The total amount to be expended under this Agreement shall not exceed $231,804.31 during the term of this Agreement. This sum shall be comprised of $205,404.31 for the three-year term with a contingency amount of $26,400 for additional custom reporting needs. 10. PRODUCT MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT. For the first year of this Agreement, upon paying the Licensee Fee and for each year thereafter, provided that Licensee continues to pay the Product Maintenance and Support Fees in accordance with the fees set out in Appendix A, Questica shall provide the Maintenance and Technical Support Services (the "Services") for the software as outlined in Appendix B, if the Licensee is not otherwise in breach of the provisions of this Agreement. If payment of the annual fee is not received by Questica before the first business day of the next sole discretion, increase the Annual Product Maintenance or Support Fees upon 30 days prior written notice. It may elect not to increase these fees in any year, however no such waiver shall preclude Questica from applying the escalation to any subsequent year or part of a year, and from making the subsequent application as if all subsequent escalation had been duly made over the period since the last increase. 11. ACCEPTANCE OF CUSTOM WORK. Within fifteen (15) business days from the delivery of each individual Custom Work, the Customer/Licensee shall, in its sole discretion, review the Product

City Council
25 –
6 12/20/2022

5 | P a g e
Customization and notify Questica whether it finds the Customizations satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If its determined that the Customizations are unsatisfactory, then it shall state in writing the reasons for its determination, including identifying any noexpectations. Questica will promptly correct the deficiencies and reinstall the Customizations, and the approval procedure shall be reapplied until Licensee finally declares the Customizations satisfactory. In the absence of a written response within 15 Business Days after the delivery of the Customizations or once the Licensee has declared the Customizations satisfactory, the Customizations shall be 12. PAYMENT. Payment is required in the currency quoted. Terms are Net-30 days from the later of a) the date of receipt of invoice, or b) the invoice date. 13. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Each of the Parties shall use reasonable efforts (and, in any event, efforts that are no less than those used to protect its own confidential information) to protect from disclosure the confidential information only to its employees or agents who require access to it for the purpose of this Agreement or as otherwise provided in this Agreement. This Section shall survive all data information which when it is disclosed by a Party is designated as confidential and shall include the Work and any other proprietary and trade secrets of Questica to which access is obtained or granted hereunder to Licensee; provided, however that confidential information shall not include any data or information which (a) is or becomes publicly available through no fault of the other Party, (b) is already in the possession of the Party prior to its receipt from the other Party, (c) is independently developed by the other Party, (d) is rightfully obtained by the other Party from a third party, (e) is disclosed with the written consent of the Party whose information it is, (f) is disclosed pursuant to court order, or other legal compulsion or (g) is subject to disclosure pursuant to federal and state public disclosure laws. 14. RESERVED 15. TERMINATION. This Agreement is effective as of the Effective Date and shall continue unless and until this Agreement is terminated. Licensee may terminate this Agreement if Questica is declared insolvent, has assigned this Agreement in violation of the terms and conditions herein, or has made an assignment for the benefit of creditors. This Agreement may be terminated by Licensee upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Questica shall be entitled to receive and Licensee shall pay Questica compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, and a termination fee if cancelled prior to the 3 year term. In the event that Licensee shall be in breach of any provisions of the Dispute Resolution Section outlined in this Agreement, Questica may provide notice of such breach to Licensee, who shall have thirty (30) days from the date of such notice to cure or rectify the said breach. Should Licensee fail to cure or rectify the said breach in the said thirty (30) days, Questica may terminate this Agreement. Such termination by Questica shall be in addition to and without prejudice to such rights and remedies as may be available to Questica including injunction and other equitable remedies. The provisions of Sections 2, 3, 9, 10, and 12 herein shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

City Council
25 –
7 12/20/2022

6 | P a g e

16. NOTICE. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given hereunder or for the purposes hereof to any party shall be in writing and shall be sufficiently given if delivered personally to such party, or if sent by prepaid registered mail or if transmitted by facsimile transmissions to such Parties as detailed in the attached Quotation or at such other address or facsimile number as the Party to whom such notice is to be given shall have last notified (in the manner provided herein) the Party giving such notice. Any notice delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed as provided herein shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day it is delivered at such address, provided that if such day is not a Business Day, then the notice shall be deemed to have been given and received on the Business Day next following such day. Any notice mailed to a Party shall be deemed to have been given and received on the fifth Business Day next following the date of its mailing provided that no postal strike is then in effect or comes into effect within four (4) Business Days after such mailing. Any notice transmitted by facsimile shall be deemed given and received on the day of its transmission if such day is a Business Day and if not, then on the next day that is a Business Day. 17. FORCE MAJEURE. Except as expressly provided otherwise in this agreement, dates and times by which any Party is required to render performance under this agreement or any schedule hereto shall be postponed automatically to the extent and for the period that such Party is prevented from meeting them by reason of any cause beyond its reasonable control (other than lack of funds), provided that the Party prevented from rendering performance notifies the other Party immediately and in detail of the commencement and nature of such cause and the probable consequences thereof, and provided further that such Party uses its reasonable efforts to render performance in a timely manner utilizing to such end all resources reasonably required in the circumstances, including obtaining supplies or services from other sources if same are reasonably available. 18. MEDIA RELEASES. Neither party shall use the name, trademark or logo of the other party without the prior written consent of the other party. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Questica may use the press releases and similar materials. 19. USE OF SUBCONTRACTORS. Questica warrants that all persons assigned by it to the performance of this Agreement shall be employees or authorized subcontractors of Questica and shall be fully qualified to work under this Agreement. Questica shall ensure that an adequate number of appropriately qualified personnel are employed and available to satisfy its obligations as outlined in this Agreement. 20. EXPORT CONTROL. The Software is intended for distribution only in the United States and Canada. Licensee agrees that it will not directly or indirectly, export or re-export the Software (or portions thereof) to any country, person, entity or end user subject to U.S. or Canadian export restrictions. 21. GOVERNING LAW AND JURISDICTION. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware and the federal laws of the United States of America without regard to the conflict of law provisions thereof. The United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods will not apply to this Agreement. Subject to Section 5 above, the parties attorn to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of Delaware in respect this Agreement.

City Council
25 –
8 12/20/2022

7 | P a g e

22. MISCELLANEOUS. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, US. Except as otherwise provided herein, no term or provisions hereof shall be deemed waived and no breach excused unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the Party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute a consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 23. AUTHORIZED RESELLER STATUS; OPTION TO PURCHASE AFFILIATE PRODUCTS. Questica is a roducts and services products and services include software-as-a-service technology for the procurement and vendor supplier sourcing industry, digital services and payment technology through a software-as-a-service platform, software solutions for grants management and indirect cost reimbursement and related implementation and consulting services, software tools to streamline permitting and licensing services, and additional web-based budgeting preparation, performance, management and data Bonfire Interactive US Ltd., eCivis Inc., CityBase, Inc., Open Counter Enterprise Inc. and Sherpa Government Solutions LLC. In addition to the products and services that are the subject of this Agreement, Subscriber has the option to purchase from either Questica, as an authorized reseller, or Questica Affiliates, Affiliate Products on terms and conditions, including pricing, to be agreed upon in writing by Subscriber and Questica or Subscriber and the applicable Questica Affiliate. 24. HEADINGS; SEVERABILITY. The headings and other captions in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only and are not to be construed in any way as additions or limitations of the covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement. In the event that any provision hereof is found invalid or enforceable pursuant to judicial decree or decision, any such provision shall be deemed to apply only to the maximum extent permitted by law, and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain valid and enforceable according to its terms. 25. TERM. This agreement shall commence on January 16, 2023 for a three (3) year term, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 15, above. 26. INSURANCE. Questica shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for security breaches, system failures, injuries to persons, damages to software, or damages to property (including computer equipment) which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Questica, its agents, representatives, or employees. Questica shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance claims arising out of their services and including, but not limited to loss, damage, theft or other misuse of data, infringement of intellectual property, invasion of privacy and breach of data. 26.1. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE- Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 26.1.1. Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01, or an equivalent form, completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location (ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.

City Council
25 –
9 12/20/2022

8 | P a g e

26.1.2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001, or an equivalent form, covering, Code 1 (any auto), or if Consultant has no owned autos, Code 8 (hired) and 9 (non- owned), with limit no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 26.1.3. as required by the State of California, with Statutory accident for bodily injury, disease, and policy limit. 26.1.4. Cyber Liability Insurance, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence or claim, $2,000,000 aggregate. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Questica in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, infringement of intellectual property, with the exception of patent infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. 26.1.5. Technology Professional Liability Errors & Omissions Insurance appropriate to the hereunder, with limits not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage shall be sufficiently broad to respond to the duties and obligations as is undertaken by Questica in this agreement and shall include, but not be limited to, claims involving security breach, system failure, data recovery, business interruption, cyber extortion, social engineering, including but not limited to infringement of copyright, trademark, trade dress, invasion of privacy violations, information theft, damage to or destruction of electronic information, release of private information, and alteration of electronic information. The policy shall provide coverage for breach response costs, regulatory fines and penalties as well as credit monitoring expenses. 26.1.5.1. The Policy shall include, or be endorsed to include, property damage liability coverage for damage to, alteration of, loss of, or destruction of electronic data and/or Questica. If not covered under liability policy, sumay be endorsed onto Cyber Liability Policy as covered property as follows: If Questica maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the Licensee requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the Licensee. 26.2. Other Insurance Provisions- The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 26.2.1. Additional Insured Status- The Licensee, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on the CGL policy with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Questica including materials, parts, or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General

City Council
25 –
10 12/20/2022

9 | P a g e
liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the insurance (at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10 11 85 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).Please note, if there is an ly review with Questica and should final adjudication in a lawsuit state that Questica shall pay damages to the Licensee. 26.2.2. Primary Coverage- For any claims related to this contract, the coverage shall be primary, with the exception of the Cyber/Errors and Omissions coverage. Coverage for commercial liability shall be at least as broad as ISO CG 20 01 04 13 as respects the Licensee, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Licensee, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers shall be excess of Q 26.2.3. Notice of Cancellation- Questica shall provide notice of cancellation to Licensee upon receipt from its insurer(s). 26.2.4. Waiver of Subrogation- Questica hereby grants to Licensee a waiver of any right to subrogation which any insurer of Questica may acquire against the Licensee by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance. Questica agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the Licensee has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. 26.2.5. Self-Insured Retentions- Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the Licensee. The Licensee may require Questica to provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self-insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or Licensee. 26.2.6. Acceptability of Insurers- Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct -VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the Licensee. 26.2.7. Claims Made Policies- If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis: 26.2.7.1. The retroactive date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 26.2.7.2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 26.2.7.3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, Questica completion of contract work. 26.2.8. Verification of Coverage- Questica shall furnish the Licensee with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause). However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive the s obligation to provide them. The Licensee reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.

City Council
25 –
11 12/20/2022

10 | P a g e

26.2.9. Subcontractors- Questica shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Questica shall ensure that Licensee is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. 26.2.10. Special Risks or Circumstances- Licensee reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

City Council
25 –
12 12/20/2022

11 | P a g e
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA_______________________________ __________________________________Kristine Ridge Clerk of the Council City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:SONIA R. CARVALHO City AttorneyBy:______________________________ ___________________________________Jose Montoya Kathryn Downs Assistant City Attorney Executive Director Finance and Management Services QUESTICA SOFTWARE LTD. Authorized Signature: __________________________Authorized Name: Wendie Leest_______________ Title: Director, Customer Success____

City Council
25 –
13 12/20/2022

12 | P a g e
APPENDIX A Order Form Fixed Price Items Description Qty Total Questica Budget Framework All Modules Operating Licenses from 50 to Unlimited $ 65,134.77 Personnel Planning from 10 to Unlimited Capital Licenses from 50 to Unlimited Read-Only Unlimited Performance Measures Included Allocations Statistical Ledger OpenBook Transparency Professional Services Consulting Package Scope of Work Appendix C Contingency for Services Scope to be determined as requested by Santa Ana (to be billed T&M) Included Included Included Included $ 3,600.00 $ 26,400.00 Annual Maintenance & Support Unlimited Licenses (one-time license cost) Discount - Unlimited Licenses (one-time license cost) $ 57,364.88 $ 15,000.00 - $ 5,000.00 Incremental Annual Maintenance & Support $ 7,500.00 Discount Consulting Package - $ 3,600.00 Total Fixed 1st Year Price: $ 75,134.77 Year 1 $75,134.77 Software Maintenance from January 17th, 2023 to January 16th, 2024 Year 2 $65,134.77 Software Maintenance from January 17th, 2024 to January 16th, 2025 Year 3 $65,134.77 Software Maintenance from January 17th, 2025 to January 16th, 2026

City Council
25 –
14 12/20/2022

13 | P a g e
Pricing Notes: Pricing valid through: December 20, 2022 Above pricing in US dollars Applicable Taxes Extra Consulting Package Work required by: March 27, 2023 Professional Services Items: This is an estimate only. All work to be invoiced monthly on Time & Materials basis. Fixed Price Items: o Terms of Payment: Software License To be charged in full on the Quote Acceptance Date Annual Maintenance: Year 1 to be charged on a pro-rated basis based on time from Quote Acceptance Date to the anniversary date of the master agreement, due on Quote Acceptance Date CONTINGENCY INCLUSION: $26,40reporting/integrations, training, consulting, etc Termination Fee In the event the Licensee cancels this Agreement prior to the end of the 3-year term, the Licensee shall pay Questica a one-time termination fee of $7,500. This fee is subject to the provisions stated in Section 15 of this Agreement. Payment Terms Maintenance and Support fees are due in full in advance of the renewal period. Questica will issue a corresponding invoice a minimum 30 days prior to the renewal date. Additional Services date of this Agreement is $225/hr. Any additional services requested shall be in writing and signed by before they are performed by Questica.

City Council
25 –
15 12/20/2022

14 | P a g e
APPENDIX B Maintenance, Technical Support 1) Product Maintenance. On an as-available basis, Questica will provide enhancements, modifications or upgrades to the Software as Questica may from time to time make available to its Licensees stry standards, does not replace the Software licensed hereunder.) Updates do not include: A) Platform extensions including product extensions to (i) different hardware platforms; (ii) different windowing system platforms; (iii) different operating system platforms B) New applications C) Services associated with the application or installation of Updates Installation of Updates is the responsibility of the Licensee. If requested, Questica will assist with the installation of Updates at its then current rates, including the testing of any site-specific customizations. Questica will provide a quote for any required rework associated with customizations resulting from the upgrade. 2) Technical Support Services. Comprehensive Phone and e-mail based Technical Support of a reasonable nature. A technical support incident or problem is a single user defined problem seeking resolution. It must be related to the original intent and design of the software. Support Services include the support of Questica supplied integrations that have not been modified by the Licensee. Each support incident is deemed closed when a remedy, workaround, or recommendation for the installation of a current maintenance release has been offered, and a commercially reasonable effort has been made to restore operation to the original intent and design of the software. Technical Support does not include: A) Custom Programming Services. B) On-site support. C) Software Installation or re-installation. D) Update Installation, or data and report updates required to support Updates. E) Licensee developed interfaces, API interactions, or customizations. F) Licensee developed reports. G) End-User Training or Re-Training. H) Licensee Hardware Issues. I) Correction of data issues derived from user error or product misuse. J) Changes to Questica developed custom reports or product customizations (including Questica supplied custom business rules or customized user screens) that are outside the scope of the accepted specification, scope of work, or authorized change requests. K) Corrections to Questica developed custom reports or customizations beyond six months from the date of delivery. (the upgrade protection period) L) Changes to integration functionality made necessary due to licensee server modifications/replacement, or changes by upgrades or changes to the integrated financial system software or hardware. Questica may at its sole discretion, periodically make reasonable modifications or changes to the Technical Support Services and/or Product Maintenance Services and/or Hosting Services provided.

City Council
25 –
16 12/20/2022

15 | P a g e
Licensee is responsible for ensuring that its personnel have sufficient training to attain and maintain competence in the operation of the Software. through 8:00pm, Eastern Standard Time. Extended coverage is available for an additional fee. Questica will provide an initial response to all properly submitted support requests within two (2) business hours of initial submission.

City Council
25 –
17 12/20/2022

16 | P a g e
APPENDIX C Scope of Work (SOW) Consulting Package Initial discovery meeting: Questica consultant chairs conversation to determine focus areas etc. Product demo: walkthrough of new features, tailored to outcome of initial discovery meeting. Review distributed budgeting (useful with unlimited licenses) Deep dive: Includes consideration of the new features of the 2021 version: calendars, user tasks, notifications, discussions, and enhanced navigation through global search and explorer trees. Change management: document package to assist with understanding of change management Configuration: any immediate changes possible through the user interface (excludes custom programming and reports). Questica Help guide: focused list of material for further review. Output document: noting all findings and a plan for unresolved/unimplemented items. Limit of effort: Neither training sessions nor ad hoc reporting are implicitly included in-scope. Training not available within this scope may be purchased at the standard services rate. END OF MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT AGREEMENT

City Council
25 –
18 12/20/2022

City Council
25 –
19 12/20/2022

EXHIBIT 2

City Council
25 –
20 12/20/2022

City Council
25 –
21 12/20/2022

City Council
25 –
22 12/20/2022

Finance and Management Services
https://www.santa-ana.org/finance
Item # 26
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
December 20, 2022
TOPIC: Debit and Credit Card Merchant Payment Processing Services AGENDA TITLE:

Approve an Additional Agreement with Global Payments Direct, Inc. DBA OpenEdge, to Amend the Card Services Terms & Conditions For Government Entities, Incorporated Within the Prior Agreement Entered into with Global Payments Direct, Inc. DBA Total System Services Inc. (also known as TSYS Merchant Solutions) for Debit/Credit Card Merchant Payment Processing Services and Support and Maintenance in the Amount not to Exceed $1,898,400, which Includes a General Contingency of $242,400

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a first amendment to agreement with Global Payments Direct, Inc. DBA OpenEdge/TSYS Merchant Solutions for debit/credit card payment processing services, including support and maintenance in an amount not to exceed $1,898,400; which includes a general contingency of $242,400 over the maximum seven-year life of the agreement. The first amendment to agreement includes a base term commencing from December 20, 2022 and expiring December 31, 2025, with provision for two renewal options of three years, and one year, respectively ending December 31, 2029.

DISCUSSION
Global Payments Direct, Inc. (“Global Payments”) is a leading provider of merchant processing payment technology and software solutions. In September 2019, Global Integrated Payments, Total System Services Inc. (“TSYS” Merchant Solutions, LLC) combined to form the overarching parent company Global Payments. On December 6, 2022, as part of the city-wide Europay, MasterCard, and Visa (“EMV”) Chip & PIN cashiering software and hardware upgrade to improve the security of debit/credit payment transactions for Santa Ana residents, City Council approved a renewal agreement with TSYS Merchant Solutions, LLC, DBA Global Payments Direct, Inc.

Global Payments will be presenting MasterCard and Visa payment transactions on behalf of the City for all walk-in credit card payments made at City facilities, including, but not limited to, the following: City Hall Cashiering Counters, Police Department Traffic and Records Divisions, and the Santa Ana Zoo and will be providing an “e-Commerce Gateway Transaction Integration”. Part of the planned upgrade of the City’s cashiering software and hardware systems also includes providing more payment options and

City Council
26 –
1 12/20/2022

First Amendment to Agreement with OpenEdge, DBA Global Payments December 20, 2022

Page 2 ends
← All documents from this meeting