Santa Ana City Council
December 20, 2022

Figure 1. Study Area Map

City Council
41 –
152
12/20/2022

Historical Resource Assessment Memorandum | 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue, Santa Ana Attn: Konnie Dobreva, EPD Solutions, Inc.

Intensive Level Survey Findings
The study area and subject property, 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue is located on Block 9, Lot 116 of the Irvine Subdivision, and was annexed into the City of Santa Ana in 1968 as part of the Alton and Newport East Annex.

The purpose of the annexation was to encourage industrial expansion of the city and as a source of future property tax revenue. Constructed in 1973, the subject property consists of three detached two-story, tilt-up concrete buildings that were developed by Rodeffer Investments, a company that was established in 1967. The 1700 E. Garry Avenue building (Building A) is located toward the far west end of the parcel and faces California State Highway 55. The 1720 E. Garry Avenue building (Building B) is located towards the north end of the parcel and faces E. Garry Avenue. The 1740 E. Garry Avenue building (Building C) is located towards the south end of the parcel and faces neighboring property 1021 Duryea Avenue. The buildings measure 230ft x 75ft and are approximately 17,000 sq ft. Surface parking surrounds the property.

The subject buildings are of identical construction and have a mostly symmetrical façade, a rectilinear floorplan, a flat roof, and minimal architectural detail throughout. The buildings feature precast ribbed concrete panel walls, a gray border below the roofline, vertical ribbon windows between horizontal aluminum dividers, evenly spaced recessed entryways with vertical wood-siding painted in gray, wood-framed fixed windows, and flush and paneled doors. Commercial concrete staircases are located on both ends of the buildings.

The 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue property does not qualify for designation under the Local Register or the CRHR.

The property and buildings do not exhibit features that would distinguish them architecturally or artistically, nor are they the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer under CRHR 3 / Local Register 1, 2, 3. No specific information was identified to indicate that the property exemplifies or represents a special element of Santa Ana’s history or is connected with a business or use that was once common but is now rare under CRHR 1 and 2 / Local Register 4 and 6. Lastly, further research and analysis of the subject property is unlikely to yield information important to an archaeological site under CRHR 4 / Local Register 5.

To arrive at these conclusions, Urbana documented and evaluated the property on California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523 series forms. We researched the property using previous Phase 1 technical studies, the City of Santa Ana Property Information Search, building permit records, city directory listings, historic aerial imagery, newspaper archives, and Urbana’s in-house architecture and construction history library. The DPR forms include current photos, a property description, construction history, historical narratives on Santa Ana, suburban office plazas and tilt-up concrete construction, and include assessment under of the Local Register and CRHR criteria.

Project Impacts Assessment
The 1700-1740 E. Gerry Avenue property does not appear eligible for inclusion on the Local Register or the CRHR.

As a result, the property does not qualify as an historical resource under CEQA. Future proposed projects would not cause an impact to historical resources within the Study Area / Area of Potential Impact. Because significant impacts have not been identified, additional mitigation is not recommended.

Refer to the attached DPR forms for additional property history and please contact the office with any questions or comments.

Respectfully Submitted,

Alexia Landa, BA

City Council
41 –
153
12/20/2022

Historical Resource Assessment Memorandum | 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue, Santa Ana Attn: Konnie Dobreva, EPD Solutions, Inc.

Attachments

Attachment 1. DPR Forms | 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

City Council
41 –
154
12/20/2022

DPR 523A (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary #
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #
PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial:

CRHR Status Code: 6Z
Other Listings:

Review Code Reviewer Date
Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

P1. Other Identifier: 1700 E. Garry Ave, 1720 E. Garry Ave, 1740 E. Garry Ave.; Garry Plaza Offices *P2. Location: o Not for Publication ý Unrestricted *a. County Orange and (P2c, P2e, and P2b or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad Tustin; Newport Beach Date 2022 T 5S ; R 9W ; o of o of Sec Unsectioned; S.B. B.M. c. Address 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue City Santa Ana Zip 92705 d. UTM: (Give more than one for large and/or linear resources) Zone 11, 420861.79 mE/ 3729744.97 mN e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, decimal degrees, etc., as appropriate) The subject property is sited south of E. Garry Avenue on Block 9, Lot 116 of the 1887 Irvine Subdivision.

Identified as Orange County Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 430-171-07-00, the property is located towards the southeast end of the City of Santa Ana, California.

*P3a. Description: The evaluated property is located on a parcel identified as 430-171-07-00 and consists of three detached commercial-use buildings addressed 1700, 1720, and 1740 E. Garry Avenue. The buildings are sited on an irregular parcel, approximately 5.13 acres, located on the south side of E. Garry Avenue. The surrounding area is composed of light commercial and industrial-use properties, with buildings of similar construction. See Continuation Sheet for additional description.

*P3b. Resource Attributes: (List
attributes and codes) (HP6)
Commercial Bldg.
*P4. Resources Present: ý
Building ý Structure o Object o
Site o District o Element of
District o Other (Isolates, etc.)
P5b. Description of Photo: View of
1720 E. Garry Ave north elevation.
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Source:
ý Historic: 1973
Building Permits
*P7. Owner and Address:

OCTA
1720 E. Garry Ave., CA. 92705
*P8. Recorded by:

Alexia Landa, B.A.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC
www.urbanapreservation.com

*P9. Date Recorded: July 2022
*P10. Survey Type: Historical Resource Assessment
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources or enter "none.") None *Attachments: o NONE ý Location Map ý Continuation Sheet ý Building, Structure, and Object Record o Archaeological Record o District Record o Linear Feature Record o Milling Station Record o Rock Art Record o Artifact Record o Photograph Record o Other (List):

City Council
41 –
155
12/20/2022

DPR 523B (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD CRHR Status Code: 6Z

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

B1. Historic Name: Rodeffer Investments
B2. Common Name: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue
B3. Original Use: Commercial-Use B4. Present Use: Commercial-Use *B5. Architectural Style: Tilt-up Concrete Construction *B6. Construction History: Construction history is based on property building permits and historic and current aerial photography. In 1973, the subject property was initially improved with the construction of three tilt-up concrete buildings by land developer Rodeffer Investments. In November of 1973, Rodeffer Investments applied for a permit to construct three, two-story buildings (Permit No. 12296). The project was valued at $608,256.

Based on historic aerials, the approximately 17,000 sq ft buildings featured a mostly symmetrical façade with precast ribbed concrete panel walls, a flat roof, and rectilinear floorplan.

Over the years, several permits were submitted for electrical, plumbing, and sewer. The only identified alteration made to the exterior of the subject buildings was in 2012. That year a permit was submitted to reroof the existing buildings (Permit #10175124). See Continuation Sheet for a complete list of property building permits.

*B7. Moved? ý No o Yes o Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: No related features.

B9a. Architect: Not Identified b. Builder: Rodeffer Investments. *B10. Significance: Theme N/A Area N/A Period of Significance N/A Property Type Commercial Applicable Criteria Local Register / CRHR Ineligible

The study area and subject property, 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue is located on Block 9, Lot 116 of the Irvine Subdivision, and was annexed into the City of Santa Ana in 1968 as part of the Alton and Newport East Annex.

Constructed in 1973, the 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue property does not qualify for designation under the Local Register or the CRHR. The property and buildings do not exhibit features that would distinguish them architecturally or artistically, nor are they the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer under CRHR 3 / Local Register 1, 2, 3. No specific information was identified to indicate that the property exemplifies or represents a special element of Santa Ana’s history or is connected with a business or use that was once common but is now rare under CRHR 1 and 2 / Local Register 4 and 6. Lastly, further research and analysis of the subject property is unlikely to yield information
important to an archaeological site under CRHR 4 /
Local Register 5. See Continuation Sheet for additional information.

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: N/A
*B12. References: See Continuation Sheet for
References
B13. Remarks: None
*B14. Evaluator: Alexia Landa, B.A.

Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC
*Date of Evaluation: July 2022
(This space reserved for official comments)

City Council
41 –
156
12/20/2022

*Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue *Map Name: Tustin, Newport Beach USGS Quadrangle Maps *Date: 2022 *Scale: 1:24,000

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
LOCATION MAP Trinomial#

City Council
41 –
157
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

Site Plan

Project Boundary:

A
Building A: 1700 E. Garry Ave
Building B: 1720 E. Garry Ave
Building C: 1740 E. Garry Ave

C
B

City Council
41 –
158
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

P3a. Description (Continued from page 1)

1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue Current Description

Built in 1973, the subject property consists of three detached two-story, tilt-up concrete buildings that were constructed by Rodeffer Investments, a company that was established in 1967. The 1700 E. Garry Avenue building (Building A) is located toward the far west end of the parcel and faces California State Highway 55.

The 1720 E. Garry Avenue building (Building B) is located towards the north end of the parcel and faces E.

Garry Avenue. The 1740 E. Garry Avenue building (Building C) is located towards the south end of the parcel and faces neighboring property 1021 Duryea Avenue. The buildings measure 230ft x 75ft and are approximately 17,000 sq ft. Surface parking surrounds the property.

The subject buildings are of similar construction and have a mostly symmetrical façade, a rectilinear floorplan, a flat roof, and minimal architectural detail throughout. The buildings feature precast ribbed concrete panel walls, a gray border below the roofline, vertical ribbon windows between horizontal aluminum dividers, evenly spaced recessed entryways with vertical wood-siding painted in gray, wood-framed fixed windows, and flush and paneled doors. Commercial concrete staircases are located on both ends of the buildings.

Current views of the property are included below and in the following pages.

View of the west elevation of the property; 1700 East Garry Ave.

City Council
41 –
159
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

View of the south elevation of the property; 1700 East Garry Ave.

View of the east elevation of the property; 1700 East Garry Ave.

City Council
41 –
160
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

View of the north elevation of the property; 1700 East Garry Ave.

View of the west elevation of the property; 1720 East Garry Ave.

City Council
41 –
161
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

View of the north elevation of the property; 1720 East Garry Ave.

View of the east elevation of the property; 1720 East Garry Ave.

City Council
41 –
162
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

View of the north elevation of the property; 1740 East Garry Ave.

View of the east elevation of the property; 1740 East Garry Ave.

City Council
41 –
163
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

View of the south elevation of the property; 1740 East Garry Ave.

View of the west elevation of the property; 1740 East Garry Ave.

City Council
41 –
164
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

B6. Construction History (Continued from page 2)

Table 1. Permit History
Date Permitted Work Permit Issued to
11/8/73 Construct Buildings (Permit #12296)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: Self
12/7/73 Plumbing (Permit #12495)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: Karu Plumbing Co.
12/13/73 Electric (Permit #2159)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: Not listed
2/15/74 Sewer (Permit #12955)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: R & R Pipeline
4/5/74 Plumbing (Permit #13482)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: R & R Pipeline
5/13/74 Plumbing (Permit #13950)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: Not listed
7/23/74 Electric (Permit #4174)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: R. E. Foley Electric
6/10/74
Install Interior Partitions -Suites 108-111 (Permit #
14244)
Owner: Rodeffer Investments
Contractor: Not listed
1/16/78 Plumbing (Permit# 27097)
Owner: Edwards Laboratory
Contractor: Niagara Plumbing
1/19/78 Plumbing (Permit# 27097)
Owner: Edwards Laboratory
Contractor: Niagara Plumbing
12/29/82 Burglar Resistant Skylights in Corridor (Permit # 18478) Owner: DVM
Contractor: RMR Development
2/3/83 P-Trap (Permit # 40254)
Owner: DVM
Contractor: RMR Development
2/3/83 P-Trap (Permit # 39564)
Owner: DVM
Contractor: RMR Development
1/12/88 Plumbing (Permit # 27097)
Owner: Edward Laboratory
Contractor: Niagara Plumbing
10/27/88 Install Satellite Dish (Permit #51110)
Owner: Mobile Home Part of America
Contractor: Owner
12/1/12 Alteration Roof Screening (Permit #10175214)
Owner: Equitable Garry Plaza
Contractor: Y S J Construction &
Roofing
5/21/12 Reroof (Permit #10175124)
Owner: Equitable Garry Plaza
Contractor: Y S J Construction &
Roofing

City Council
41 –
165
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

B10. Significance (Continued from page 2)

Historic Overview of Santa Ana
William Spurgeon, a native of Kentucky, founded the City of Santa Ana in 1869.1 Prior to the American Period, which began in 1848 following the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the secession of California from Mexico to the United States, much of what is now Orange County, along with most of Southern California, was held by Mexican families in vast tracts comprised of tens of thousands of acres. In the fall of 1869 Spurgeon and his partner Ward Bradford purchased approximately 74 acres of what once was part of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. The men split their holdings with Spurgeon taking the eastern half where he founded his town. The original plat for Santa Ana was small, but courageous on Spurgeon's part, only twenty- four blocks of approximately ten lots each. At the time Anaheim was the only other community in region.

Other towns followed close behind Santa Ana, including the cities of Orange and Tustin, which were founded in 1870.

Santa Ana grew slowly at first. Spurgeon worked hard to ensure the success of his town by opening roads and digging wells, and when those no longer proved sufficient, he formed the Semi-Tropic Water Company to extend a canal from Orange to guarantee adequate water supply.2 He also opened and operated a general store and post office with his brother at the corner of Fourth and West Streets (now Broadway). Because of Spurgen's efforts other businesses congregated in the area, establishing Fourth Street as the commercial district.3 By the late nineteenth century Santa Ana had the appearance of a mid-sized town with many multi- story Victorian style brick buildings. Fourth Street sported several business blocks, banks, hotels and opera house.

Santa Ana incorporated as a City in 1886 at the height of the real estate boom sweeping Southern California.

Three years later, in 1889, present-day Orange County separated from Los Angeles County, incorporating as a separate municipality. Due to its geographical location at the center of the new county and its large population, Santa Ana was named as the County seat.
4 By 1891 three railroad lines had been installed
through Santa Ana; the Southern Pacific Railroad, which established Santa Ana as the end of the Orange County Line in 1877; the Santa Fe, which arrived in 1887 running from Los Angeles to San Diego; and the Santa Ana and Newport Railroad in 1891, which ran between Santa Ana and McFadden's Wharf in Newport Beach.
5 Until the 1940s the economy of Santa Ana, as well as greater Orange County, rested primarily on agriculture.

Early on grapes and livestock were the principal products of the region. Chili peppers and Lima beans were later preferred. At the turn of the twentieth century sugar beets, grown for sugar production, had become such a significant crop in the area that Santa Ana was coined the “Sugar City.” 6 Sugar beets were first grown
in Orange County in 1891 and were shipped to Chino where the Oxnard brothers had recently opened a processing plant.7 Another sugar factory was opened in Los Alamitos in 1897. The year 1908 witnessed the

1 Leo J. Friis, Orange County Through Four Centuries (Santa Ana, CA: Friis – Pioneer Press, 1982), 59 and Esther R. Cramer, Keith A. Dixon, Diann Marsh, Phil Brigandi and Clarice A. Blamer, eds. A Hundred Years of Yesterdays (Santa Ana, CA: The Orange County Centennial, Inc., 1988), 176, claim that Spurgeon hailed from Kentucky, while Charles D. Swanner, Santa Ana: A Narrative of Yesterday, 1870 – 1910 (Saunder Press, Claremont, CA, 1953), 15, claims he was from Missouri. 2 Pamela Hallan-Gibson, The Golden Promise: An Illustrated History of Orange County (Northridge, CA: Windsor Publications, Inc., 1986), 76. 3 Swanner, 17.
4 Cramer, et al.,36-37 and Friis, 96-98.
5 Hallan-Gibson, 112-113.
6 Cramer, et al., 41.
7 Friis, 104-105 claims this was in 1890, however the Chino plant didn't start operation until 1891, see “Beet Sugar in California,” San Fransisco Chronicle, 12 January 1891 as well as Torsten A. Magnuson, "History of the Beet Sugar Industry in California,” Annual Publication of the

City Council
41 –
166
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

opening of the Southern California Sugar Company, located south of the intersection of Delhi Avenue (now Warner Avenue) and Main Street, in Santa Ana. Four years later, with the backing of James Irvine, another refinery opened in the city - the Santa Ana Cooperative Sugar Company (later subsumed by the Colorado company Holly Sugar). This one sited on Dryer Road approximately one mile east of Main Street.8 At the industry's height roughly 70 square miles of southwest Orange County were devoted to beet cultivation with four processing plants responsible for one fifth of the nation's refined sugar. 9 The beet curly top virus struck the region in 1919. The disease deforms the plant making it unusable for sugar production. The outbreak seriously affected sugar beet crops in the early 1920s, causing a steep decline in production. At the same time tree crops such as apricots, walnuts and citrus replaced beet fields, rapidly becoming the most significant agricultural products for the local economy. By 1930 only one sugar factory in Santa Ana remained operational.
10 During the 1920s the Santa Ana region also attracted a significant influx of successful mid-western farmers; many settled on area ranches while others chose the comforts of the smaller subdivisions that sprung up around downtown. The arrival of the Pacific Electric “Red Cars” in 1905 allowed urban development to push out beyond the traditional city center.
11 By the 1930s these small suburban tracts pushed further out into the agricultural lands, mostly north and west of the city center. The tendency to locate subdivisions further from established areas was further encouraged by the increasing popularity of the automobile. This trend continued as time progressed and the use of the automobile became more commonplace.

Residential construction overtook agriculture as the region's economic engine in the post-World War II era.

Returning servicemen flocked to Orange County in search of the American Dream. Developers bought up prime agricultural land, put in streets and infrastructure and then started building houses, hundreds at a time.

Massive subdivisions replaced once thriving groves. Freeways encouraged continued growth, each new mile opening up areas that were once relatively inaccessible. The Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) traced its way south from Los Angeles reaching Santa Ana by 1952. Newly completed freeways provided easy access to the metropolitan area, effectively making Orange County a bedroom community of Los Angeles. Countless subdivisions advertised themselves within close proximity to freeways and metropolitan Los Angeles by association.

The freeway also encouraged industry to establish itself within the Santa Ana region. Research and high-tech manufacturing companies established a presence in the area because of the abundance of housing, well- educated labor and ready access to open space and recreation, and a connection to metropolitan Los Angeles via the limited access freeways allowed products to be efficiently transported into existing supply chains. The development of additional business caused need for more housing - and the cycle continued. 12 Between 1940
and 1960, the population of Orange County jumped from 130,760 to 703, 925 people.13

Historical Society of Southern California Part I Vol. XI (1918): 76-78. The same Oxnard brothers established a sugar refinery and town bearing their name in Ventura County, California.
8 Magnuson,76-78.
9 Friis, 105 and Steve Emmons, "Sugar Factory in Santa Ana - How Sweet It Was," Los Angeles Times, 31 October 1999. 10 Friis, 105 and Orange County Historical Society, Orange County (Charleston, SC: Arcadia, 2005), 79. 11 Friis, 118.
12 Richard Bigger, James D. Kitchen, Lyndon R. Musolf and Carolyn Quinn, Metropolitan Coast: San Diego and Orange Counties, California (Los Angeles: Bureau of Governmental Research, 1958), 66-67 and Hallan-Gibson, 238. 13 Cramer, et al., 55.

City Council
41 –
167
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

As subdivisions spread across the county shopping centers supplanted the traditional shopping areas like Fourth Street, Santa Ana. The new centers offered much that traditional downtowns shopping districts were missing. They were arranged for the pedestrian, often around a central mall, and stores were separated from car traffic and parking lots. They were also geographically closer to the newly developed suburbs, were conveniently located near freeways and had ample parking. Fashion Square was the first shopping center to open in Santa Ana area in 1958. The Bristol Shopping Center opened soon after, located at Bristol Street and Warner Avenue, in an area experiencing tremendous residential development.

Into the contemporary period, in the 1970s and 1980s, Santa Ana, Orange County, and the greater Southern California region experienced an uptick in development of suburban business parks and commercial office parks. A product of the country’s post-WWII car culture that emerged in the early 1950s, most of these office complexes were speculative, for-profit endeavors intended to house numerous tenants, both large ‘anchor’ companies and smaller sole-proprietor businesses offering goods or professional services. In this period, the city annexed surrounding lands including portions of the 1887 Irvine Subdivision that forms the neighboring City of Irvine.

Corporate Office Parks and Suburban Business Plazas
The Cultural Landscape Foundation defines a corporate office park as a complex of office buildings, often sited on a large tract of land near an arterial highway, outside dense urban concentration. Suburbanization of corporate headquarters evolved in the mid-twentieth century when corporations such as IBM, Weyerhaeuser, Pepsico, and Connecticut General moved their offices out of city centers and closer to the residences of their senior executives. The grounds were arranged as rolling parkland, often utilizing low-rise buildings. The site planning, automobile approaches, visitor entrances, employee parking lots, and service docks all exemplified the functionalism of mid-twentieth century Modernism. These park-like locations often provided settings for the display of corporate collections of large-scale public art, and, in certain cases, display of large-scale products such as the tractors at John Deere.
14 In contrast to these pastoral campuses, suburban business plazas emerged along arterial thoroughfares between highways. In Orange County, at the junction of Tustin, Irvine, and Santa Ana, countless examples are present with many constructed in the 1970s and 1980s in the contemporary period. Many were constructed using tilt-up methods.

Tilt-up Concrete Construction
The subject property, located on Block 9, Lot 116 of the Irvine Subdivision, was annexed into the City of Santa Ana in 1968 as part of the Alton and Newport East Annex. The purpose of the annexation was to encourage the industrial expansion of the city and as a source of future property tax revenue. The subject property is a commercial / light industrial tilt-up concrete building constructed in 1973. Tilt-Up construction is a method in which concrete wall panels are cast on-site and tilted into place. Thomas Edison, founder of the Portland Cement Company in 1899, explored and later promoted tilt-up concrete construction as early as ca. 1908 with the construction of tilt-up detached single-family homes in Union, New Jersey. The Portland Cement Company supplied concrete and tilt-up molds for projects throughout the United States. Robert Aiken, generally regarded as the father of the tilt-up methodology, began using this method around the turn of the 20th century with the earliest examples being retaining walls at the Camp Logan Rifle Range, in Illinois, and a concrete factory on Aiken's own farm near Zion City, Illinois. Aiken poured the walls flat on a bed of sand, around door and window frames, and then tipped them up onto their foundation. He used the tilt-up method to construct the Memorial Methodist Church in Zion, as well as a two-story ammunition and gun house at Camp Logan. From here, Aiken refined his methods to include a steel tipping table that was used in the construction of 15 buildings in five different states.

14 Cultural Landscape Foundation, Corporate Office Park. https://www.tclf.org/category/designed-landscape-types/corporate- office-park.

City Council
41 –
168
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

The post-WW II construction boom created a demand for more efficient construction methods, creating inroads for the tilt-up industry. The advent of high-capacity mobile cranes, portable welders (for rebar), custom lifting devices, structural wall bracing, and ready-mix concrete trucks enabled builders to erect tilt-up buildings quickly. Into the 1970s, engineers began developing designs to use tilt-up concrete walls as load- bearing structural elements. The proliferation of microcomputers enabled more sophisticated architectural treatments and complex panel shapes. These methods and systems were employed throughout the United States, including in Southern California where suburban business parks and commercial-office / business centers were constructed in isolated campus settings and along auto corridors radiating through cities between connecting highways. By the 1970s, Tilt-up construction was widely recognized by builders and commercial real estate owners as durable, with less opportunity for leaks, and an efficient construction process, making it the primary method of industrial and commercial buildings constructed in the 1970s and beyond, secondarily resulting in a monotonous horizontal landscape throughout Southern California’s commercial-industrial zones. By the mid-1980s the Tilt-Up Concrete Association (TCA) was formed from the Portland Cement Association to provide input to code bodies, develop technical information to meet the needs of the Tilt-Up industry, and promote the benefits of Tilt-Up. Originally led by Executive Director Don Musser, the TCA was originally funded by the Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute (CRSI) and the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association (NRMCA), with each association also providing organizational support.[1]

In the contemporary period, the most significant examples of cast concrete, tilt-up, and modular construction generally originate from the Brutalist style. From the French phrase béton brut, meaning “raw concrete,” Brutalist architecture peaked in the 1960s and 1970s, but the style began several decades earlier, following World War II as Europe was in a state of rebuilding. The word “brutalism” in relation to architecture was coined in 1950 by Swedish architect Hans Asplund in reference to a home called Villa Göth. The style was designed for function and utilitarianism and was primarily used in social and institutional buildings. Mass- produced tilt-up buildings like 1700-1740 E. Garry represent the basest form of modular construction and are not regarded as examples of Brutalism, sharing only a common material and temporal dimension.

Property Ownership History
Between 1973 and 1974, the property was under the ownership of the Rodeffer Investments.15 Rodeffer Investments was a local land development company that was founded by Elmer Orion Rodeffer in 1967.

During the 1960s and 1990s, the company purchased several investment properties and constructed both commercial and industrial-use buildings throughout the Orange County area.16 They were known for using the tilt-up concrete building method, which offered a fast, efficient, and economical way to build.17 From their main office in Newport Beach, the company designed custom office condominiums at affordable prices. By the 1980s, as the company expanded they established a partnership with the Hawthorne Development Company.18 Together they designed and constructed several commercial-use buildings in the Laguna Hills area.19 In 1981, the company was awarded the Construction Industry Award For Engineering Excellence for their work on an unidentified project in Sun City.20 Around this time, Rodeffer Investments served as the starting point for noted architect Mark Singer, who briefly worked at the company following his graduation from California State Los Angeles.21 Singer would go on to become an award-winning architect in Laguna and a fellow of the American Institute of Architect’s.22 Over the years, the property was acquired by different

15 Los Angeles Times, May 2, 1974.
16 Ibid; Las Vegas Review-Journal, March 23, 1997.
17 Ibid.
18 Ibid.
19 The Los Angeles Times, July 12, 1981.
20 Los Angeles Times, May 3, 1981.
21 Los Angeles Times, September 28, 2015.
22 Mark Singer, Mark Singer Architect: Awards. Website. http://www.marksingerarchitects.com/awards.

City Council
41 –
169
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

owners and offices were rented by several businesses. During historic research, little substantive information was found on the owners and occupants. Today, the property is under the ownership of the Orange County Transportation Authority and continues to serve as a commercial-use property.

Table 2. Partial Property Ownership History
Date Owner Source
1973-1974 Rodeffer Investments Building Permit
1978-1988 Edward Laboratory Building Permit
1988 Mobile Home Part of America Building Permit
2012 Equitable Garry Plaza Building Permit
2017-2019 Garry Owners, LLC Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 2021-present Orange County Transportation Authority Orange County Assessor’s Office

City Council
41 –
170
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

B10. Significance (Continued from page 2):

Local Register Criterion 1: Buildings, structures or objects with distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period, that exemplify a particular architectural style or design features.

Under Criterion 1, the buildings do not qualify for l isting in the Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties.

Built in 1973, the buildings are basic, tilt-up construction, commercial-use structures that do not embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style or period. Like many of the commercial/light industrial-use buildings in the area, the structures have a more utilitarian appearance and rather than attractive were meant to be functional and affordable. As such, the buildings do not exhibit features that would distinguish them archi tecturally or artistically. For this reason, the buildings are not eligible under Criterion 1.

Local Register Criterion 2: Works of notable architects, builders, or designers whose style influenced architectural development.

The subject buildings were not identified as the work of a notable architect, builder, or designer. Therefore, the buildings are not eligible under Criterion 2.

Local Register Criterion 3: Rare buildings, structures, or objects or original designs .

Under Criterion 3, the subject buildings are not considered rare , but rather of common construction that utilized the tilt-up concrete building method. Tilt-up concrete construction was meant to be cost-effective, efficient, and functional , and as such is visible in several commercial and industrial -use properties in the area. The construction method was typically applied to one-story buildings but is not unusual to be used for structures as tall as four stories. For this reason, Urbana opin es the 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue property not eligible under Criterion 3.

Local Register Criterion 4: Buildings, structures, objects or sites of historical significance which include places (a) where important events occurred; (b) associated with famous people, original settlers, renowned organizations and businesses; (c) which were originally present when the city was founded; or (d) that served as important centers for political, social, economic, or cultural activity.

The 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue commercial-use buildings do not have an association with events or persons that have made significant contributions to the local, regional, or cultural heritage of California. The buildings were not constructed during the initial development of Santa Ana and the property did not serve as an important center that contributed to the political, social, economic, or cultural activity of the city. The buildings are one of several commercial/ industrial-use buildings that were constructed during the 1970s and 1980s around the peripherals of the city. No specific information was identified to indicate that the property, in and of itself, exemplifies or represents a special element of Santa Ana’s history. For this reason, the property is not eligible for designation under Criterion 4.

Local Register Criterion 5. Sites of archaeological importance.

Local Register Criterion 5 is typically applied to archaeological sites. Research and analysis of the 1700-1740 E.

Garry Avenue property is limited to above ground historic resources. Therefore, the property is not eligible under Local Register Criterion 5.

Local Register Criterion 6: Buildings or structures that were connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare.

Research does not indicate that the subject property was connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. Therefore, the property is not eligible under Criterion 6.

City Council
41 –
171
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

CALIFORNIA REGISTER OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES (CRHR) ELIGIBILTY REVIEW

CRHR Criterion 1: Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage.

This is equivalent to Local Register Criterion 4 and 6. Research does not indicate that the subject property qualifies for designation under Criterion 1. The subject property is located on Block 9, Lot 116 of the Irvine Subdivision. The property was initially improved in 1973 with the construction of three commercial-use buildings. The buildings were constructed at a time when the City of Santa Ana experienced increased development of suburban business parks and commercial office parks during the 1970s and 1980s. Most of these office complexes were speculative, and for profit endeavors intended to house numerous tenants. To encourage the industrial and commercial expansion around the peripherals of the city, surrounding lands, including portions of the 1887 Irvine Subdivision, were annexed into the city. The subject property is one of many commercial / industrial-use properties constructed in the area during this period. The property does not appear to be individually significant, nor did it make a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage. For this reason, Urbana determined the property is not individually eligible under Criterion 1.

CRHR Criterion 2: Association with the lives of persons important in California’s past.

This is equivalent to Local Register Criterion 4. Research does not indicate that the subject property qualifies for designation under Criterion 2. The 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue is not associated with the lives of persons important to local or California history. Therefore, the subject property does not qualify under Criterion 2.

CRHR Criterion 3: Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creative individual or possess high artistic values.

This is equivalent to Local Register Criterion 1, 2, and 3. Under Criterion 3, the building is not the work of a master and does not possess high artistic values and does not rise to a level beyond the ordinary. For this reason, Urbana determined the property is not individually eligible under Criterion 3.

CRHR Criterion 4: Potential to yield information important in prehistory or history.

This is equivalent to Local Register Criterion 5. The subject property is not eligible under Criterion 4 as it is unlikely to yield information important in prehistory or history.

Integrity

Integrity is the ability to physically convey significance. Evaluation of integrity must always be grounded in an understanding of a resource’s physical features and how they relate to its significance. To retain historic integrity, a resource will possess several, and usually most of the following seven aspects of integrity:
location, materials, design, setting, workmanship, feeling, and association. If it is determined that a resource is eligible for designation because it meets one or more of the adopted designation criteria, the integrity of the resource must be evaluated. Integrity is the ability to convey its significance. Only after the historic significance of the resource is fully established can the issue of integrity be addressed.

The 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue property has not been found by Urbana to be individually eligible for designation under any of the criteria. Further integrity analysis is not merited.

City Council
41 –
172
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

*B12. References (Continued from page 2):

Ancestry.com. A variety of records were accessed online in July 2022 at: http://home.ancestry.com/. These include city directories, voter registration records, military records, and United States Census Data.

Bowers Museum. Prequel to the Origin Story: A Prehistory of Santa Ana’s Foundation. Bowers Museum.

Website, (November 6, 2019). Accessed July 2022.
https://www.bowers.org/index.php/collection/collection-blog/prequel-to-the-origin-story-a-prehistory- of-the-santa-ana-s-foundation

City of Santa Ana. Building Permits for 1700-1740 E. Garry AVenue. On file at the City of Santa Ana, Building Division.

California Office of Historic Preservation. California Register and National Register: A Copmarison. Technical Assistance Series 6. (1999). Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento.

City of Santa Ana Historic Preservation. Website: (n.d.). Accessed July 2022. https://www.santa-ana.org/historic-preservation/.

County of Orange, OCPW Maps 4. Website: (n.d.). Accessed July 2022. https://www.ocgis.com/ocpw/landrecords/.

National Register Bulletin 16A. “
How to Complete the National Register Registration Form.” Washington DC:

National Register Branch, National Park Services, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991.

Nationwide Environmental Title Research.

Historic Aerials. Website, (1999). Accessed July 2022.
https://www.historicaerials.com/.

Office of Historic Preservation. “Instruction for Recording Historical Resources.” Sacramento: March 1995.

Reed, A. Roberta.

Images of America: Santa Ana. SC: Arcadia Publishing, 2011.

Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1905-1931.

University of California Santa Barbara Library.

Frame Finder. Website (n.d.). Accessed July 2022.
https://mil.library.ucsb.edu/ap_indexes/FrameFinder/.

U.S. Department of the Interior. Earth Explorer. Website (n.d.) Accessed July 2022. https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/.

City Council
41 –
173
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

Assessor Parcel Map

Source: Assessor’s Map Book 1-88, County of Orange Assessor’s Office.

City Council
41 –
174
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

Historic Aerials

1972 aerial of the subject property and surrounding area. No structures are visible on the parcel.

Source: Earth Explorer

City Council
41 –
175
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

March 1973 aerial of the evaluated property and surrounding area. No structures are visible on the property. The property was not improved until November of 1973.

Source: Frame Finder, UC Santa Barbara Library.

City Council
41 –
176
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

1974 aerial of the evaluated property and the surrounding area. The buildings continue to appear in their original footprint.

Source: Frame Finder, UC Santa Barbara Library.

City Council
41 –
177
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

2007 aerial of the evaluated property and the surrounding area. The buildings continue to appear in their original footprint.

Source: Frame Finder, UC Santa Barbara Library.

City Council
41 –
178
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

Newspaper and Genealogical Database Search Results for Owners and Occupant

The subject property was initially improved in 1973 by the Rodeffer Investment Company. The company was known for utilizing the tilt-up concrete method of construction, which offered a fast, efficient, and economical way to build
Source: Los Angeles Times, June 15, 1971.

City Council
41 –
179
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

In addition to 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue, Rodeffer Investments also constructed the 1800-1820 E. Garry Avenue buildings located directly east of the property.

Source: Los Angeles Times, Feb 10, 1980.

City Council
41 –
180
12/20/2022

DPR 523J (9/2013) *Required information
State of California - The Resources Agency Primary#
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#
CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial#

Resource Name or #: 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue

During the 1980s, as the company continued to grow, they established a partnership with local building company, Hawthorne Development Co., and constructed several custom commercial-use buildings primarily in the Laguna Hills area.

Source: Los Angeles Times, July 12, 1981.

City Council
41 –
181
12/20/2022

Historical Resource Assessment Memorandum | 1700-1740 E. Garry Avenue, Santa Ana Attn: Konnie Dobreva, EPD Solutions, Inc.

Attachments

Attachment 2. Preparer Qualifications

City Council
41 –
182
12/20/2022

Alexia Landa, BA
Historian + Archaeologist
[email protected]

Alexia Landa is a Veteran of the United States Navy having served from 2007-2012, including deployments in the Middle East. For the USN, she served as an Aircrew Survival Equipmentman. In this capacity she inspected aircraft and aircrew life-support equipment for evidence of abuse, damage, or malfunction. She holds a Bachelor of Arts (double major) in History and Anthropology from San Diego State University. Prior to joining Urbana, Alexia served as an Archaeological Specialist for the California Department of Parks and Recreation Southern Service Center where she performed archaeological monitoring and site assessment activities for a variety of project types including State Park facility improvements, historic building maintenance, and municipal water and sewer system repair and replacement. She meets The Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards in the discipline of History. At Urbana Alexia leads field survey and monitoring activities, conducts contextual and site- specific research, prepares historic context statements, and authors technical reports and site records. Ms. Landa’s passion for history is demonstrated through her volunteer work with the Museum of Man, the San Diego Museum of Natural History, and as a member of the Board of Directors for the San Diego County Archaeological Society.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
In-Progress Glen Canyon National Park Service Post 1955 Housing Survey and MPDF, Page, AZ
2021 351 Watson St. Historic Evaluation; Monterey, CA
2018-2021 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating Remediation Program, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report | Ivanpah-Control Project, Inyo, Kern, and San Bernardino Counties, CA 2021 Transmission Line Rating & Remediation Project, Ivanpah Control Line, Archival Research Package, Southern California Edison, Southern CA 2020-2021 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating Remediation Program, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report | Eldorado -Pisgah-Lugo Project, San Bernardino County, California and Clark County, Nevada
2021 City of Escondido Delisting and Re-evaluation, 340 Waverly Place, San Diego, CA
2021 City of Monrovia Historia Resource Analysis Report, 213-217 Novice Lane, Monrovia, CA
2021 City of Coronado Determination of Historic Significance, 710 10 th Street,
Coronado, CA
2021 City of San Diego Historic Property Survey Report, 3167 Market Street, San Diego, CA
2021 Village of Fallbrook DPR Evaluation, 129 S. Vine Street, Fallbrook, CA 2021 City of Coronado Determination of Historic Significance, 202 B Street- 1216 2nd Street, Coronado, CA
2021 City of Coronado Determination of Historic Significance, 136 F Avenue, Coronado, CA
2021 American Silk Factors Mill Historic Resource Analysis Report, 528 N.

Mission Road, San Marcos, CA
2021 Irwindale DPR Evaluation, 5265 N 4th Street, Los Angeles, California 2021 East Gilman Channel Mitigation Historic American Engineering Record , Banning, California

EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts-
History and Anthropology
School of Arts and Letters,
California State University, San Diego

PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Historian + Archaeologist: Urbana
Preservation & Planning, LLC
(San Diego) 2018 – present
—
Field Archaeologist / Historian:

Loveless & Linton, Inc. Cultural
Preservation & Archaeology
(San Diego) 2017-2019
—
Archaeological Project Leader:

California State Parks, Southern
Service Center (San
Diego) 2017-present
—
Field Archaeologist:

PanGIS, Inc. (San Diego) 2017
—
Field Archaeologist:

Channel Islands National Parks
Services (Santa Rosa) 2017

PROFESSIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
Society of California Archaeology
—
Board Member: San Diego County
Archaeological Society
—
Society of Architectural Historians

City Council
41 –
183
12/20/2022

Alexia Landa, BA
Historian + Archaeologist
[email protected]

2021 Getchell Ranch Historic American Building Survey, 4055 Lytle Creek Road, Fontana, California.
2020 Jurupa Valley Mira Loma Quartermaster Depot Historic Resource Analysis Report, Riverside County, CA
2020 City of Coronado Determination of Historic Significance, 457 E Aven ue, Coronado, CA
2020 City of Coronado Determination of Historic Significance, 518 Adella Lane, Coronado, CA
2020 Rancho Miramonte Project Historic Property Survey Report, Chino, CA 2020 City of Coronado Determination of Historic Significance, 800 1st Street, Coronado, CA
2020 City of Coronado Determination of Historic Significance, 610 10th Street, Coronado, CA
2020 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating Remediation Program, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report | Kern River to Los Angeles Project, Kern and Los Angeles Counties, California
2020 Even Hewes Highway / Coyote Wash Bridge Historic Property Survey Report, Imperial County, California
2019-2020 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating Remediation Program, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report | Control-Silver Peak Transmission Corridor, Inyo and Mono Counties, California
2019 Lindsay Substation and Bliss-Lindsay 66kV Sub-Transmission Line Historic Property Survey Report, Lindsay, CA
2019 Pedley Powerhouse Historic Property Survey Report, Norco, California 2017-2019 Crew Chief / Archaeological Monitor for linear trench utility excavations; prepared daily reporting, photo documentation, and artifact recordation; facilitate contractor and crew communications.
2017 Site excavation, artifact identification, screening, and lab analysis for ancient paleocoastal site at Santa Rosa Island within Channel Islands National Park
2017-2020 Archaeological Project Leader for California State Parks projects in San Diego, Imperial, Kern, Orange, Los Angeles, Ventura, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo Counties.

ACTIVITIES & HONORS

SDSU School of Arts and Letters,
Dean’s List
—
SDSU Anthropology Graduate
Students Association
Undergraduate Writing
Contest,1st Place Winner, 2016
—
SDSU Spencer Lee Rogers
Alumni Award Nominee, 2017

City Council
41 –
184
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

Founding Principal, Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, brings an expert background in American history, architecture, and urban planning, with a particular emphasis on issues relating to historic preservation. Her experience includes extensive historical resources survey work, design review under The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties , single -site historic property research and documentation, and practice in municipal regulatory planning and cultural resources compliance issues including code compliance, revision an d review, CEQA, NEPA, and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. As a preservation-planning consultant she participates in the development and administration of local land use regulations, policies, programs and projects; prepares reports involving research and analysis of various planning issues; conducts site -specific project and design review; and facilitates project coordination between contractors, architects, developers, citizens and other stakeholders. Wendy meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Qualifications Standards in the disciplines of History and Architectural History and the draft standards established for Historic Preservation and Land Use/Community Planning. She is included on the California Council for the Promotion of History’s Register of Professional Historians and also maintains professional certification in the American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP).

Wendy is a co -author and editor of the AICP Certified Urban Designer Exam Study Guide (V1.0) released in March 2016. From 2013 forward she has provided professional training to AICP exam applicants as part of the American Planning Association California Chapter – San Diego Section annual exam training program.

Wendy has assiste d municipalities, utility providers, and lead agencies in preservation planning program development and implementation efforts. She regularly consults for private and agency applicants on historical resource and historic property analysis for discretionary projects and undertakings pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the California Environmental Quality Act, as well as Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit proposals at National Register listed or eligible properties, which are subject to review by the State Office of Historic Preservation and the National Park Service. She was the author / facilitator and lead historic preservation consultant for the City of Chula Vista’s award -winning Municipal Preservation Pl anning Program. She authored the Historic Preservation Element for the City of La Mesa’s award winning 2011 / 2030 General Plan update process. She provides survey, architectural history, context development, programmatic agreement, and historic preserva tion planning consulting services for the Southern California Edison Company including preparation of a programmatic guide for the treatment of all historic -era properties in the company’s 55,000 square mile service territory. She served as the lead Architectural Historian for the City and County of Honolulu High Capacity Transit Corridor Project’s Kako’o (Section 106 Programmatic Agreement Program manager) consultant team. Wendy’s professional analysis and determinations are reviewed for compliance and concurrence by numerous municipalities, and state and federal agencies including the California State Office of Historic Preservation, the California Public Utilities Commission, the USDA Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the National Park Service.

Her current interests include facilitating approvals for brick and mortar construction and building rehabilitation projects, and working with community -based organizations that emphasize public participation while striving for the improvement of the built environment through good urban and architectural design and associated social programs .

EDUCATION
Master of City Planning,
Preservation & Urban Design Emphasis
San Diego State University
—
Bachelor of Arts – History
San Diego State University

REGISTRATIONS
American Institute of Certified Planners
(#022838)
Register of Professional Historians
(#612)

E

XPERIENCE
2005-present: Founding Principal
Urbana Preservation & Planning, LLC
—
2012-present: Faculty Lecturer
San Diego State University
City Planning Graduate Program
—
2006-2017: Faculty Instructor
University of California, San Diego
Urban Planning & Development Program
—
2002-2005: Historian / Planner
Architectural Resources Group
—
2001-2002: Historian / Planner
Historic Research Services
—
2000-2001: Historian
Office of Marie Burke Lia, Esq.
—
1996-1999: Asst. Coordinator +
Researcher:

SHPO/CHRIS
South Coastal Information Center

City Council
41 –
185
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

PROJECT EXPERIENCE*
In-Progress Post Rock Resources of Kansas National Register Nominations; Lincoln, Mitchell, Rush, and Russell Counties, KS.

In-Progress USACE Santa Fe Dam Evaluation; Los Angeles, CA. 2021 City of Laguna Beach Preservation 101 Workshop – Staff Training, Laguna Beach, CA.
2021 Post Rock Resources of Kansas Survey and MPDF; Lincoln, Mitchell, Rush, and Russell Counties, KS.
2021 Historic Resource Research Report: 3800 University Ave; San Diego, CA . 2021 860 Muender Ave Historic Integrity Memo; Sunnyvale, CA. 2021 Lafayette Hotel Rehabilitation & Tax Credit Consulting; San Diego, CA . 2021 Old Tavern Rehabilitation & Tax Credit Consulting; Sacramento, CA . 2021 Historic Resource Research Report: 4070-72 Georgia Street; San Diego, CA. 2021 Transmission Line Rating & Remediation Project, Ivanpah Control Line, Archival Research Package, Southern California Edison, Southern California. 2021 528 E. Mission Road Historic Resource Analysis Report; San Marcos, CA. 2021 4055 Lytle Street – Getchell Ranch / The Stone House Historic American Building Record (HABS) Level II Documentation, Fontana, CA. 2021 Norco Egg Ranch Historic American Building Record (HABS) Level II Documentation, Norco, CA.
2021 East Gilman Channel Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) & Monument Consulting, Banning, CA.
2021 5265 N. 4th Street Historical Resource Summary; Irwindale, CA. 2021 Historic Resource Analysis Report: 3611 Hyacinth Drive Historic Designation Package, San Diego, CA.
2021 Historic Resource Analysis Report: 2675 Clove Street Historic Designation Package, San Diego, CA.
2021 Historic Resource Analysis Report: 8301 La Mesa Blvd Historic Assessment; La Mesa, CA.
2021 1033 Pandora Drive Historic Designation; La Mesa, CA. 2021 7345 Remley Place Mills Act Application and Rehabilitation Plan, San Diego, CA.
2021 3629 Front St Mills Act Application and Rehabilitation Plan, San Diego, CA. 2021 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Ivanpah-Control Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 1135 Devonshire Drive, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation Package, 3575 Via Flores, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Analysis Report and CA DPR Forms, Archibald and Schaefer RV Park, City of Ontario, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 2275 Evergreen Street, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 9434 Sierra Vista Drive, La Mesa, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Analysis Report: CEQA Evaluation and CA DPR Forms, Mira Loma Quartermaster Depot, Rutan & Tucker, LLP, Jurupa Valley, CA. 2020 Historical Resource Evaluation Memorandum & CA DPR Forms, Ontario RV Storage Mitigated Negative Declaration, Ontario, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation 1610 Santa Barbara Street, San Diego, CA.
2020 Red Fox Room Retroactive Review, JCG Development, San Diego, CA.

BOARDS + COMMITTEES
Chair / Immediate Past Chair:

American Planning Association
National Urban Design & Preservation
Division, 04/2012-12/2016
—
Founder + Volunteer Executive
Director / Ex –Officio Director: Built
Environment Education Program
(BEEP) San Diego, 2008-2015
—
Education Committee Member:

California Preservation Foundation,
04/2012-04/2014
—
Vice-Chair + Newsletter Editor: APA
National Urban Design & Preservation
Division, 01/2010-03/2012
—
Director & Education Chair: San Diego
Architectural Foundation, 11/2008-
2011
—
Appointed Public Member: City of San
Diego Historical Resources Board
Incentives Subcommittee, 08/2008-
02/2010
—
Advisor/Member – UCSD Extension
Advisory Group Urban Planning &
Development Certificate Program,
2007 forward
—
Founding President – Jack London
District Association, 2005-2006

SELECT AWARDS
2016 - Award of Excellence for
Preservation Advancement - City of San
Diego Historical Resources Board
(recognized for Urbana's preservation
planning study for the San Diego State
Normal School Campus & San Diego
City Schools Historic District).
—
2014 - American Planning Association
(APA) San Diego Chapter – Planning
Agency Award for preparation of La
Mesa 2030 General Plan. *Historic
Preservation Element prepared by
WLTB / Urbana.

City Council
41 –
186
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

2020 Rancho Miramonte Section 106 Evaluation: Historic Property Survey Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chino, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Technical Report: 2956 Roosevelt Street, Sterling Corporation, Carlsbad, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 4350 Nabal Drive, La Mesa, CA.
2020 4630 Date Street Historic Landmark Nomination, La Mesa, CA. 2020 Avo Theater Rehabilitation Tax Credit Consulting, JCG Development, Vista, CA.
2020 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Kern River to Los Angeles Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, 1025 Devonshire Drive, San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic Resource Research Report: Historic Designation & Mills Act Package, “The Muse” 1020 Prospect Street, La Jolla, CA.
2020 Historic District Nomination Package: Culverwell and Taggarts, City of San Diego, CA.
2020 Historic District Nomination Package, Arizona Street Tract, Park Villas Subdivision, City of San Diego, CA.
2020 Historical Resource Analysis Report, Moiola School, Fountain Valley, CA. 2020 Historical Resource Survey, Proposed Merrill Commerce Center Specific Plan, Ontario, CA.
2020 Historic Property Survey Report :Evan Hewes Highway and Bridge Evaluation, Imperial County, CA.
2020 Historical Resource Analysis Report: Historic Designation and Mills Act Application 552 Rushville Street, San Diego, CA.
2019 Historic Context and Preservation Element Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report for Southern California Edison Company Lindsay Substation and Bliss-Lindsay 66kV Sub-Transmission Line.
2019 To Kalon Vineyard / Robert Mondavi Winery Patent Litigation Expert Witness Consulting, Oakville, CA.
2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report, Vic Braden Tennis College, 23333 Ave La Caza, Coto De Caza, CA.
2019 Church of God in Christ Bulletin 580 Package.
2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7407 Alvarado Road, La Mesa, CA . 2019 City of Laguna Beach Preservation Ordinance and Program Consulting . 2019 Historic Resource Research Report and Conditions Consulting, 8445 Avenida de las Ondas, La Jolla, CA.
2019 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Control-Silver Peak Transmission Corridor, Historic- Era Built Environment Survey Report.
2019 Southern California Edison Catalina Island Historic-Era Water System Management Program, Catalina Island, CA.
2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report, Southern California Edison Catalina Island Wrigley Pipeline Project, Catalina Island, CA.
2019 Retroactive Historical Resource Research Report, 31 st Street, San Diego, CA.
2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report Southern California Edison Pedley Powerhouse Complex, Norco, California . 2019 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report Southern California Edison Company Eastern Sierras Transmission System, Mono County and Inyo County, California.

RELATED EXPERIENCE
Member: County of San Diego Valle de
Oro Community Planning Group,
09/2016 forward
—
Director + Civic Improvement Chair,
Grossmont-Mt. Helix Improvement
Association, 08/2016 forward
—
Mentor: San Diego State University
Aztec Mentor Program, Spring 2016
Cohort
—
Co-Author / Editor: AICP Certified Urban
Designer Exam Study Guide, Version 1.0
(released March 2016)
—
AICP Exam Course Speaker: California
Chapter, San Diego Section, (annually)
02/2013-present
—
Retreat Facilitator: Beautiful Pacific
Beach, Annual Board of Directors
Retreat, (annually) 2016-present
—
Invited Panel Speaker: Density and
Design: The Future of Housing in San
Diego, American Planning Association
San Diego Section, San Diego, 09/2017
—
Invited Speaker: Building Community
and Character – Preservation is Place; 1st
Annual Historic Preservation
Conference Nebraska State Office of
Historic Preservation, Omaha (NE),
06/2013
—
Panel Speaker: Preservation Toolkit for
Small Cities, American Planning
Association California Chapter
Conference, 10/2012
—
Invited Speaker: Preliminary Findings –
The Status of Preservation Planning
Regulatory Programs in the San Diego
Region - 2012, Association of
Environmental Professionals San
Diego Chapter September Luncheon,
09/2012

City Council
41 –
187
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

2019 Historical Resource Research Report, 3629 Front Street, San Diego, CA . 2019 Programmatic Agreement Among the Bureau of Land Management – California, the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, California Utility Providers, and the California Office of Historic Preservation, Regarding the Identification, Evaluation, Management, and Exemption of Historic- Era Electrical Infrastructure Facilities in the State of California. 2019 City of San Diego Clairemont Community Plan Update, Historic Context and Preservation Element.
2019 Historic Site Report, 10446 Russell Road, La Mesa, CA. 2019 City of Coronado, As-Needed Historic Research Consulting, Coronado, CA. 2019 Historical Resource Research Report, 4250-52 Cleveland Ave, San Diego, CA. 2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Control-Silver Peak Transmission Corridor, Historic- Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey. 2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Control-Haiwee Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey.
2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating a nd Remediation Program ICKI Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey.
2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Eldorado-Lugo-Pisgah Transmission Corridor, Historic- Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey. 2018 City of San Diego Park Boulevard Residential Historic District Historic Context Statement and Nomination Package.
2018 California Department of General Services, Metropolitan State Hospital Project Historical Resource Analysis Report.
2018 City of San Juan Capistrano, River Street Marketplace Historical Resource Analysis Report.
2018 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Rating and Remediation Program Kern River to Los Angeles Transmission Corridor, Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report – Phase 1 Desk Survey. 2017 Historic Site Designation Package, Wexler House 1088 Sierra Vista Avenue, La Mesa, California.
2017 Nelson-Sloan Otay Rock Plant Property, Chula Vista, California 91910. 2017 Adams Avenue, Murrieta, California, Tract Map Historical, Cultural, and Paleontological Report.
2017 4 Greenwood Common (Berkeley Landmark No. 125) Mills Act Application Package, Berkeley, CA.
2017 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 1201 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California.
2017 Design Review Analysis and Historical Resource Research Report, 4884 Marlborough Avenue, San Diego, California.
2017 Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report, SCE MacNeil Substation, Burbank, California.
2017 Peer Review Statement, 400 S. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California. 2017 4617-4619 and 4621-4625 Park Boulevard, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2017 Historical Resource Research Report, 707 17
th Street, San Diego, California.
2017 5064 Lotus Street, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2017 Historical Resource Technical Report, 550 Sicard Street, San Diego, California.

SELECT AWARDS (CONT.)
2013 – American Planning Association
National Division Executive Committee
Recipient – Division Achievement
Award (recognized for professional
development webinars on historic
preservation, urban design, and
development topics developed on behalf
of the APA Urban Design & Preservation
Division).
—
2012 - American Association of
Environmental Professionals San Diego
Chapter – Outstanding Planning
Document Award for preparation of the
City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation
Program & Ordinance. *Historic
Preservation Ordinance& Program
prepared by WLTB / Urbana.
—
2012 - American Planning Association
National Division Executive Committee
Recipient – Education Excellence Award
(recognized for education efforts on
behalf of the APA Urban Design &
Preservation Division).
—
2011 - American Planning Association
National Division Executive Committee
Recipient Branding Award (recognized
for visibility, outreach, and education
efforts on behalf of the APA Urban
Design & Preservation Division).
—
2010 - Award of Excellence in Education
- City of San Diego City Planning &
Community Investment Department
Historical Resources Board (recognized
for the Built Environment Education
Program developed for the San Diego
Architectural Foundation / BEEP San
Diego).
—
2009 - San Diego Public Library
Foundation / Friends of the San Diego
Public Library 2008-2009 Chapter
Volunteer Award, University Heights
Branch (recognized for preservation
planning work at the historic San Diego
State Normal College campus).

City Council
41 –
188
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

2017 Historic Landmark Designation Package, 9415-9425 Eldorado Lane, La Mesa, California.
2017 6035 University Avenue, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2016 Expert Witness Consulting, Bernati Ticino Trust v. City of San Diego 2016 4365-4369 Ohio Street, San Diego, California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2016 4505 Park Boulevard, San Diego California, Historical Resource Technical Report.
2016 Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Reporting and Consulting for the Edwin K. Hurlbert House, 2930 Chatsworth Boulevard, San Diego, CA. 2016 NHPA Section 106 Historic Property Analysis and Findings of Effect Statement for the Southern California Yeshiva High School, San Diego, CA. 2016 Peak Valley Solar Farm CEQA Cultural Resources Analysis (Historical Resources, Cultural Resources, and Paleontological Resources), San Bernardino County, CA.

September 2016 City of Oceanside / Caltrans, Coast Highway (Hill Street) Bridge over the San Luis Rey River Replacement Project Historical Resources Evaluation Report, Oceanside, CA.

August 2016 Historical Resource Technical Report – 715 Muirlands Vista Way, La Jolla, CA.

June 2016 Class III Cultural Resources Inventory / NRHP Eligibility Determination, SCE Eldorado 500kV Transmission System, California, Arizona, Nevada.

June 2016 Casa de las Flores Property Carriage House / Garage Building, Historical Resource Analysis Report, Chula Vista, CA.

May 2016 Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) No. CA-167-O – Southern California Edison Company Big Creek Hydroelectric System Vincent 220kV Transmission Line, Kern, Fresno, and Los Angeles Counties.

May 2016 San Diego Gas & Electric Company Eastern Division Property Eligibility Review Memo, El Cajon, CA.

March 2016 Historical Resource Review - 1347-1349 Locust Street, Walnut Creek, CA.

March 2016 City of La Mesa Collier Park NHPA Section 106 Review, La Mesa, CA.

March 2016 Redwood Solar Farm 4 CEQA Cultural Resources Analysis (Historical Resources, Cultural Resources, and Paleontological Resources), Kern County, CA.

March 2016 City of La Mesa Vista La Mesa Park NHPA Section 106 Review, La Mesa, CA.

February 2016 City of Chula Vista Third Avenue Community Character + Business Improvement Guidelines.

February 2016 City of San Diego HRB No. 461 / Anderson House, San Diego County Historic Site Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Consulting, 3841 Sweetwater Road, Bonita, CA.

January 2016 Historic American Landscapes Survey (HALS) No. CA-122 – Collier Park, La Mesa, CA.

December 2015 Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) No. CA-2138 – Southern California Edison Company Substations: Monumental Type, Santa Barbara, Kern, Fresno, and Los Angeles Counties.

December 2015 Pacific Gas & Electric Company South of Palermo Project Historical Resource Analysis Report / Historic Property Survey Report.

November 2015 Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) No. CA-167-N – Amendment to Southern California Edison Company Big Creek Hydroelectric System East & West Transmission Line.

November 2015 Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Reporting and Consulting for the Alexander Schreiber Spec House No. 1 / Payne House, 1429 Dale Street, San Diego, CA.

RELATED EXPERIENCE (CONT.)
Attendee: National Charrette
Institute, Introduction to Dynamic
Planning (Level 1 NCI Charrette
Manager Certification Training), San
Diego (CA) 10/2003
—
Attendee: CA Preservation Foundation,
Incentives for Historic Preservation
Projects, Berkeley (CA) 09/2003
—
Attendee: University of Southern CA,
Preservation Planning & Law, Los
Angeles (CA) 07/2003
—
Attendee: League of CA Cities, Smart
Growth Zoning Codes, Lodi (CA) 12/2002
—
Invited Participant: Second Natures,
Redefining the Los Angeles Riverfront,
Los Angeles (CA) 01/2002 (2-Day
Planning & Design Charrette hosted by
MOCA & The Geffen)
—
Selected Smart Growth Researcher: San
Diego State University Foundation &
City Planning Graduate Program, Dr.

Roger Caves, 01/2001 – 08/2001 (Grant
Topic: Planning for Sprawl in the U.S)
—
Attendee: Section 106 An Introductory
Course, National Preservation Institute,
San Francisco (CA) 04/1999

C

OURSES CREATED & TAUGHT
BUSA 40687 - Historic Preservation
Planning (UCSD 2006-2012)
—
BUSA 40515 - Fundamentals of City
Planning (UCSD 2007)
—
BUSA 40748 - Foundations of Urban
Planning & The Built Environment
(UCSD 2009-2012)
—
BUSA 40749 - Functions & Processes of
City Planning (UCSD 2011-2012)
—
ART 40436 - American Architectural
History I & II (UCSD 2008-2014)
—
CP 670 - History of Urban Planning
(SDSU 2012)

City Council
41 –
189
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

October 2015 Designation and Mills Act Rehabilitation Reporting and Consulting for the Florence Palmer Spec. House II of III, 350 Fern Glen, San Diego, CA.

May 2015 Historic-era Electrical Infrastructure Management Program: A Program for the Identification, Review, Exemption, and Treatment of Generating Facilities, Transmission Lines, Sub-transmission Lines, Distribution Lines, and Substations within the Southern California Edison Company’s Service Territory.

March 2015 Class III Cultural Resources Inventory for Southern California Edison’s Coolwater-Lugo Transmission Project, San Bernardino County, California – Volume 1: Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report. 2014-2015 Los Angeles Regional Intercommunications System NHPA Section 106 Assessment of 125 sites located throughout Los Angeles County. 2014 Historic Preservation and Urban Planning Expert Witness, Brandon Milan v.

City of San Diego, State of California Superior Court Case No. 37- 2013- 00067039-CU-EI-CTL.
2013-2014 Historic Preservation and Urban Planning Expert Witness, Edward Valerio v.

City of San Diego, U.S.D.C. Case No. 12C1200W (WMC)
November 2014 Historic-Era Built Environment Survey Report, NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Evaluations, and Concurrence Consulting for proposed Coolwater Lugo Transmission Project (approx. 200 built environment sites over 13 segments in the vicinity of Apple Valley, Barstow, and Hesperia, California) .

November 2014 Herald Examiner Building, 1101-1139 S. Broadway, Los Angeles, CA, Historic Preservation Certification Application: Part 1 – Determination of Eligibility – Draft Submittal.

November 2014 Cecil Hotel Building, 640 Main Street, Los Angeles, CA, Historic Preservation Certification Application: Part 1 – Determination of Eligibility – Draft Submittal.

November 2014 Cecil Hotel Building, 640 Main Street, Los Angeles, CA, City of Los Angeles Historic Cultural Monument Application Package – Draft Submittal.

November 2014 Historic-Era Electrical Infrastructure Management Program: A Program for the Identification, Review, Exemption, and Treatment of Generating Facilities, Transmission Lines, Sub-transmission Lines, Distribution Lines, and Substations within the SCE Service Territory.

October 2014 Commercial Exchange Building, 416 W. 8
th Street, Los Angeles, CA, Historic
Preservation Certification Application: Part 2 – Description of Rehabilitation – Draft Submittal.

October 2014 NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Review, SCE Lighthipe and Laguna Bell Substations, Long Beach and Commerce, California.

October 2014 NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Review, SCE Eagle Rock Substation, Los Angeles, California.

October 2014 NRHP / CRHR Eligibility Review, SCE Colton Substation, Colton, California.

September 2014 City and County of Honolulu Little Makalapa National Register of Historic Places Nomination Peer Review.

September 2014 City and County of Honolulu Big Makalapa National Registe r of Historic Places Nomination Peer Review.

September 2014 Sudberry Properties Strawberry Fields Historic Cultural Landscape Analysis Report, Chula Vista, CA.

July 2014 Friday Morning Club Building, 938 S. Figueroa, Los Angeles, CA, Historic Preservation Certification Application: Part 2 – Description of Rehabilitation – Draft Submittal.

May 2014 Commercial Club of Southern California Building / Case Hotel Part 2 Determination of Eligibility, Los Angeles, CA.

May 2014 City and County of Fresno Tertiary Treatment and Disinfection Facility – Plant 2 NHPA Section 106 and CEQA Historical Resource Assessment.

City Council
41 –
190
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

April 2014 City and County of Honolulu Aloha Stadium Station Project Treatment Plan Peer Review, Honolulu, CA.

April 2014 Redwood Solar Farm Historic Property Survey / Historical Resource Report, Kern County, CA.

April 2014 4th@ Broadway EIR Mitigated Negative Declaration – Historical Resource Assessment Report, Los Angeles, CA
March 2014 Commercial Club of Southern California Building / Case Hotel Part 1 Determination of Eligibility, Los Angeles, CA.

February 2014 Commercial Club of Southern California Building / Case Hotel Historic Cultural Monument Application, Los Angeles, CA.

January 2014 1560 S. Escondido Boulevard NHPA Section 106 Review and Concurrenc e Consulting.

November 2013 Consulting for Two Historic House Relocations to the City of San Diego Development Services Department, Public Works Department, and City Attorney’s Office.

September 2013 Caltrans Section 106 Historic Property and CEQA Historical Resource Survey – Gilbert Street, Santa Ana, CA.

October 2013 NHPA Section 106 Historic Property and CEQA Historical Resource Survey Report, Proposed Coolwater Lugo Transmission Project.

June 2013 Historic Agricultural Landscapes of Visalia and Tulare County electronic book and exhibit – Tulare County Museum of Farm Labor and Agriculture, Visalia, CA
January 2013 National Park Service Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) Level II Documentation (Large Format Negative Photography & Narrative ) – Big Creek Hydroelectric System East & West Transmission Line, Fresno to Los Angeles, CA
January 2013 Historical and Architectural Eligibility Evaluation of Delano Substation Complex.

October 2012 Historical and Architectural Eligibility Evaluations of the Southern California Edison Company Historic-Era Casitas, Santa Barbara, Carpinteria, Santa Clara, and Goleta Substations
October 2012 City and County of San Francisco, 2419-2435 Lombard Street Historical Resource Evaluation Report.
2011-2013 Historic Preservation Expert Witness, Academy of Our Lady of Peace v. City of San Diego, U.S.D.C. Case No. 09CV0962 WQH (MDD)
In-process San Diego Municipal Anglers Building Historical Resource Designation Report, San Diego, CA
July 2012 National Park Service Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) Level II Documentation (Large Format Negative Photography & Narrative) – SCE San Joaquin Cross Valley Loop Project, Visalia, CA
June 2012 Historic Structure Report - Casa Peralta, 384 West Estudillo Avenue, San Leandro, CA
June 2012 County of San Diego Historic Site Designation Report, John N. Mortenson’s Hines Residence, Mt. Helix, CA
April 2012 NHPA Section 106 Review, Lodi Municipal Stadium, Lodi, CA March 2012 Federal Rehabilitation Certification Application – Part 3 Request for Certification of Completed Work – Imig Manor / Lafayette Hotel, 2223 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA
February 2012 National Register of Historic Places Nomination, Imig Manor / Lafayette Hotel, 2223 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA
February 2012 Sequoia National Forest Electric Power Conveyance Systems NRHP Eligibility Evaluations, Tulare County, CA
January 2012 NHPA Section 106 Review, La Mesa Youth Center, La Mesa, CA

City Council
41 –
191
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

December 2011 City of La Mesa 2012 General Plan Update – 2030 Historic Preservation Element, La Mesa, CA
December 2011 Crown City Medical Center EIR Historical Resource Initial Study, Pasadena, CA
November 2011 NHPA Section 106 Review, 4470 Acacia Avenue, La Mesa, CA September 2011 Big Creek Hydroelectric System Historic District Vincent 220kV Transmission Line NRHP Eligibility Evaluation and Historic Property Treatment Plan.

July 2011 Historic-Era Electric Power Conveyance Systems Programmatic Agreement (SCE, BLM, & CA, NV SHPO) (Context, Typology, Identification, Integrity Qualifications, & Treatment Processes)
June 2011 Aesthetic impact Analysis Report, Hollywoodland Historic Rock Retaining Walls, Los Angeles, CA
April 2011 Kern River – Los Angeles 60 / 66kV Transmission Line NRHP Eligibility Evaluation, Kern & L.A. Counties
December 2010 Historic Structure Report - Linda Vista Federal Defense Housing Project Tenant Activity Building, San Diego, CA
October 2010 City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency, Historic Property / Historical Resource Analysis Report of the Linda Vista Federal Defense Housing Project Tenant Activity Building, San Diego, CA
November 2010 Historic Designation Report, Burt F, Raynes Residence, 299 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista, CA
August 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Antelope-Vincent No. 1 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review
July 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Rosamond Substation NRHP/CRHR Review, Montebello, California July 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Antelope-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review June 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Chino-Mesa 220kV Transmission Line NRHP/CRHR Review June 2010 Southern California Edison Company Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project Chino Substation NRHP/CRHR Review, Chino, California April 2010 Historical Resource Analysis Report, Hollywoodland Historic Rock Retaining Walls, Los Angeles, CA
March 2010 Imig Manor/ Lafayette Hotel Part 2 20% Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Application
January 2010 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 2629 National Avenue, San Diego CA
December 2009 City of Santa Ana Warner Avenue Transportation Study Historical Resource Survey, Santa Ana, CA
December 2009 Proposed Heidi Square Redevelopment Project – Project Management, Preservation Planning & Subdivision Re-Design Consulting, San Lorenzo, CA November 2009 City of San Diego Redevelopment Agency, Historical Resource Review of 4102-4122 University Avenue, San Diego, CA
November 2009 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7195 Country Club Drive, La Jolla, CA
November 2009 Imig Manor/ Lafayette Hotel Part 1 20% Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit Application
August 2009 CEQA Historical Resource Analysis Report, 5511 Calumet Avenue, La Jolla, CA
August 2009 Preservation Planning Study, Site Development, & Rehabilitation Analysis of the Herman Hotel Carriage House, Chula Vista, CA

City Council
41 –
192
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

August 2009 Historical Site Designation, Design Review, & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting for the Dennstedt Building Company’s Calavo Gardens Queen Avenue Dwelling, Mt. Helix, CA
August 2009 CEQA and NHPA Section 106 Review of the Nike Missile Defense System - LA - 14/29 Commemorative Site, unincorporated Los Angeles, CA July 2009 Code Compliance & Resource Review, 2341 Irving Avenue, San Diego, CA July 2009 City of Santa Ana Bristol & 17
th Transportation Study Historical Resource
Survey, Santa Ana, CA
May 2009 Fresno Unified School District Historical Resource Survey of the Proposed M - 4 Site, Fresno, CA
May 2009 Section 106 Review of Casa Blanca – 716 Santa Clara Avenue, Alameda, CA April 2009 Design Review Analysis for the 2110 Glenneyre Street Property, Laguna Beach, CA
April 2009 Section 106 Review of the Fairfax Theatre, Oakland, CA March 2009 National Register of Historic Places Documentation & Eligibility Evaluation for the Middle Fork American River Hydroelectric Project, Placer County, California
February 2009 Historical Resource Analysis Report & Design Review – 337 Hawthorne Road, Laguna Beach, CA
February 2009 San Diego Normal School Campus Phase I Preservation Planning Study & Historical Resource Survey, San Diego, CA
January 2009 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 634 2 nd Avenue, Chula Vista, CA
October 2008 Pier 29 National Historic Preservation Act Finding of Effects Statement, San Francisco, CA
2007-2008 Lead Consultant – City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Program Development – City of Chula Vista Historic Preservation Program Binder (ordinance, historic inventory database, historical overview statement, incentives, project review process and related permit application and processing forms
August 2008 Mayor John Gill Residence, Designation, Mills Act & Rehabilitation Consulting, San Leandro, CA
July 2008 California Portland Cement Company P&H Excavators #3 & #4 Historic Context Statement & California Register Eligibility Review, Mojave, CA July 2008 Historic Context Statement – Bean Springs Site, Rosamond, CA June 2008 Cultural Resource Report & Regulatory Review, PL-SCE-Tehachapi-10H, Acton, CA
May 2008 Historical Resource Documentation & Review, San Diego Aqueduct, San Diego, CA
April 2008 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Goldberg Residence, 4654 Iowa Street, San Diego, CA
April 2008 Storefront Improvement / Façade Revitalization Historical Resource Analysis & Design Review Assistance, 3201 Adams Avenue, San Diego, CA March 2008 Lombardi Ranch CEQA Review, San Ardo, California February 2008 Del-Sur Saugus Mining Complex Historical Resource Review, Grass Valley, CA
February 2008 Foothill Ranch Historical Resource Review, Palmdale, CA January 2008 Section 106 Review 1425-1475 South Main Street, Walnut Creek, CA January 2008 Historic Site Designation Report & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting - Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historic District Contributor, 4670 Del Monte Ave., San Diego, CA
November 2007 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Olmstead Building Company’s Calavo Gardens Project #531, Mt. Helix, CA October 2007 Southern CA Edison Company’s Del Sur-Saugus Transmission Line Historical Resource Review, Lancaster - Palmdale, CA

City Council
41 –
193
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

October 2007 Southern CA Edison Company’s Antelope Substation Historical Resource Review, Lancaster, CA
September 2007 Historical Resource Review & Data Responses for the Proposed SDG&E Orange Grove Energy Project in Pala, CA
September 2007 SCE Kaiser Pass Cabin Historic Property Assessment, Fresno Co., CA August 2007 USDA Forest Service Meeks Creeks Bridge Assessment, Lake Tahoe, CA July 2007 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 433 W. Meadow Drive, Palo Alto, CA May 2007 Historic Preservation Assessment & New Project Planning and Design Consulting – 3994 Jackdaw Street, San Diego (CA)
February 2007 419 Park Way Historical Resource Analysis Report, Chula Vista, CA January 2007 Upper Triangle Areas Historic Property Survey (Historic Context Statement and Architectural/Historical Documentation of 50 Properties over 15 City Blocks), Fresno, CA
December 2006 Historic Site Designation & Mills Act Historic Property Tax Consulting for the Charles Wakefield Cadman Residence, Mt. Helix, CA.

November 2006 Historical Resource Analysis of the 4303 Narragansett Avenue Property, San Diego, CA
September 2006 Section 106 Review of the 1333 Balboa Street Property, San Francisco, CA September 2006 Section 106 Review of the Historic Delta-Mendota Canal, Los Banos, CA August 2006 Historical Evaluation Report – 2959 East Avenue, Hayward, CA June 2006 Historical Resource Analysis Report: 418-450 10 th Avenue Properties, San
Diego, CA
May 2006 Section 106 Review of the Cocoanut Grove Building – Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk, Santa Cruz, CA
May 2006 Historical Resource Evaluation Report for the 70 15th Street Warehouse, San Diego, CA
April 2006 Historic Site Designation Report & Mills Act Property Tax Consulting - Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historic District Contributor, 4528 Saratoga Avenue, San Diego, CA
March 2006 City of Fresno Arts-Culture District Historic Property Survey (Historic Context Statement and Architectural/Historical Documentation of 90 -100 Properties over 18 City Blocks), Fresno, CA
March 2006 South Mossdale Historic-Era House Evaluation, Lathrop, CA February 2006 Westwind Barn Historic Preservation Study, Los Altos Hills, CA January 2006 Section 106 Review of the 2654 Mission Street Property, San Francisco, CA January 2006 Section 106 Review of the 325 Mowry Avenue Property, Fremont, CA 94536 January 2006 Section 106 Review of Ardenwood 34551 Ardenwood Bouevard, Fremont, CA 94555
December 2005 Section 106 Review of the 1230 N Street Property, Sacramento, CA 95814 December 2005 Section 106 Review of the Sacramento City College Water Tower, Sacramento, CA
November 2005 Section 106 Review of Fair Oaks Watts, 525 La Sierra Drive, Sacramento, CA November 2005 Napa Valley College Bus Shelter West Historical Resource Analysis Report, Napa, CA
October 2005 Section 106 Review of the 1025 3
rd Street Property, Sacramento, CA 95818
September 2005 City of Davis, Historic Anderson Bank Building Research, Documentation & Design Review Analysis, 203 G Street, Davis, CA
September 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 1212 & 1214 Second Street, San Rafael, CA

City Council
41 –
194
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

August 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report – Somky Property/Thompson’s Soscol Ranch, Napa, CA 94558
July 2005 Walnut Creek Women’s Club Environmental Impact Report, 1224 Lincoln Avenue, Walnut Creek, CA
June 2005 Tam Property Lot Split Historic Preservation Consulting, Castro Valley, CA May 2005 Historical Resource Analysis Report, 7329-7331 Eads Avenue, San Diego, CA March 2005 Ehlers Estate Historical Resource Analysis, 3222 Ehlers Lane, St. Helena, CA March 2005 University of CA at Santa Cruz Preservation Consulting (Campus Wide Cultural Resources Inventory, Historic Context Statement – Campus Planning History)
February 2005 Hall Winery Historical Resource Analysis, St. Helena, CA January 2005 Historical Resource Evaluation, 700 28th Avenue, San Mateo, CA January 2005 Historical Resource Evaluation, 312 & 318 Highland Avenue, San Mateo, CA December 2004 San Mateo Motel Historical Resource Report – Park Bayshore Townhomes – Environmental Impact Report (Revised February 2005)
November 2004 Historical Evaluation of the San Mateo Motel, 801 South Bayshore Boulevard, San Mateo, CA
October 2004 Stonegate Homes Subdivision Plan, and Single-and-Multi-Family Dwellings Design Review, San Mateo, CA
September 2004 University of CA at Santa Cruz, Getty Campus Heritage Grant Application September 2004 City of Riverside Downtown Fire Station No.1 Cultural Resources Analysis, Riverside, CA
August 2004 Residential Remodel Design Review – Glazenwood Historic District Contributor, 929 Laurel Avenue, San Mateo, CA
August 2004 Odd Fellows Hall, Historic Structure Report, 113 South B Street, San Mateo, CA (with Conservator Seth Bergstein)
July 2004 Design Review Analysis – Schneider’s Building, 208 East Third Street, San Mateo, CA 94401
July 2004 Embarcadero Cove Development Project Initial Study – Preliminary Historical Resource Analysis, Oakland, CA 94606
July 2004 Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 4830 Cape May Avenue, San Diego, CA 92107 (Revised January 2005)
June 2004 City of Monterey Alvarado Street Mixed-Use Project - APE Survey, Monterey, CA
June 2004 City and County of San Francisco Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 450 Frederick Street, San Francisco, CA 94117
June 2004 Design Review Analysis – 117 Clark Drive, San Mateo, CA 94402 May 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 426 Clark Drive Residence, San Mateo, CA 94402 April 2004 City and County of San Francisco Historical Resource Evaluation Report – 1272 42
nd Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94122
April 2004 City of Fresno Broadway Row Historical Resource Survey, Fresno, CA March 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 117 Clark Drive Residence, San Mateo, CA 94402 March 2004 Historical Evaluation of The Fresno Republican/McMahan’s Building, 2030 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721
February 2004 Crocker Bank Building Preservation Planning Considerations Memorandum January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 501 Walnut Street Residence, San Carlos, CA 94070
January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 20 Madison Avenue and 29 Hobart Avenue Properties, San Mateo, CA 94402
January 2004 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 571 Valley Street, San Francisco, CA
January 2004 Historical Evaluation of the 3925 20
th Street Residence, San Francisco, CA
94131

City Council
41 –
195
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

November 2003 Historical Evaluation of Commercial Building Located at 1022 El Camino Real, San Carlos, CA
November 2003 Peer Review Statement for the K & T Foods Building, 451 University Avenue, Palo Alto, CA
November 2003 Historical Evaluation of the Greer-O’Brine Property, 51 Encina Avenue, Palo Alto, CA,
November 2003 Embarcadero Hotel Environmental Impact Report, Historical Resources Analysis and Design Review Statement
October 2003 City of San Leandro Historical Resources Survey, Historic Context Statement, Historic Preservation Ordinance, and Draft Historic Preservation Benefits/Incentive Program
August 2003 Palm Theater Environmental Impact Report, Historical Resources Analysis July 2003 Historical Evaluation of The First Christian Church Building, 2701 Flores Street, San Mateo, CA 94403
June 2003 Alameda Naval Air Station Reuse Project Historic Preservation Regulatory and Policy Memorandum (Prepared for Alameda Point Community Partners-Master Developer for NAS Alameda)
May 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 606 Dorchester Road, San Mateo, CA
March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory 40’ x 80’ Wind Tunnel National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center)
March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory 6’ x 6’ Supersonic Wind Tunnel National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center) March 2003 Ames Aeronautical Laboratory Administration Building National Register Nomination (Prepared for NASA Ames Research Center)
March 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 1015 South Grant Street, San Mateo, CA
February 2003 8
th & Market, 10 United Nations Plaza, Cell Site Impact Review, San Francisco, CA
February 2003 Existing Conditions and Subdivision Design Alternatives for The Proposed Hayman Homes Tract No. 7267, Proctor Road, Castro Valley, CA February 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 336 West Poplar Avenue, San Mateo, CA
January 2003 Historical Evaluation of The Residence Located At 744 Occidental Avenue, San Mateo, CA
January 2003 Historical Evaluation of the 131 and 141 West Third Avenue Apartment Buildings, San Mateo, CA
December 2002 CA State Capitol Building, Historical Resource Review, Sacramento, CA November 2002 Wireless Antenna Site Review, Medical Arts Building, 2000 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA
October 2002 Historical Evaluation of The LeDucq Winery Estate, 3222 Ehlers Lane, St.

Helena, CA 94574 (Revised June 2003)
October 2002 Historical Assessment of The St. Patrick’s Parish Community Building Located At 3585 30
th Street, San Diego, CA, 92104
September 2002 Historical Assessment of The Building Located At 4257 Third Street, San Diego, CA,
April 2002 Historical Assessment of The Building Located At 3567 Ray Street, San Diego, CA,
October 2001 Historical Assessment of The Gustafson’s Furniture Building Located At 2930 El Cajon Boulevard, San Diego, CA, 92104
September 2001 Historical Review of Lots A, B, K & L, Block 93, Horton’s Addition Lockling, San Diego, CA
August 2011 El Cortez Hotel Part 3 - Request for Certification of Completed Work

City Council
41 –
196
12/20/2022

Wendy L. Tinsley Becker, RPH, AICP, Principal
Architectural Historian + Urban / Preservation Planner
[email protected]

August 2001 Core Inventory of All Sites Appearing to Be More Than 45 Years of Age Not Previously Documented (Prepared For Centre City Development Corporation)
August 2001 Urbana Project Abstract Bibliography (Prepared for Dr. Roger Caves, San Diego State University and San Diego State University Foundation) July 2001 Historical Assessment of The Kirkland Apartments Building Located At 2309 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, CA, 92103
July 2001 Historical Assessment of The Building Located At 4230 Maryland Street, San Diego, CA, 92103 (With Kathleen A. Crawford)
June 2001 Historical Assessment of the 2525-2529, 2537-2547, 2561 First Avenue Residences, San Diego, CA 92103
May 2001 Update of The November 1988 Historic Site Inventory of Centre City East for Centre City Development Corporation (with Scott Moomjian) April 2001 East Village Inventory of All Sites Appearing to Be More Than 45 Years of Age Not Previously Documented (Prepared for Centre City Development Corporation)
April 2001 Update of The May 1989 Historic Site Inventory of Bayside for Centre City Development Corporation
January 2001 Historic Survey Report of The Former Teledyne-Ryan Aeronautical Complex 2701 North Harbor Drive San Diego, CA 92101(with Scott Moomjian) January 2001 Historical Assessment of The Fletcher-Salmons Building 602-624 Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101
December 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Winona Avenue Area Elementary School Preferred Site, Alternative 1 Site, and Alternative 2 SiteNovember 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Edison/Hamilton/Parks Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Sites
November 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Adams/Franklin Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Site
October 2000 The National Register of Historic Places Travel Itinerary; Old Town San Diego August 2000 Cultural Resource Report for The Winona Avenue Area Elementary School Preferred Site and Alternative Sites
July 2000 Cultural Resource Report, 52nd Street Area Elementary School Preferred & Alternative Sites, San Diego, CA
July 2000 Historical Assessment of the 3658 Warner Street Residence, San Diego, CA 92106
July 2000 Historical Assessment of the 367 Catalina Boulevard Residence, San Diego, CA 92106
July 2000 Historical Assessment of the 906 West Lewis Street Residence, San Diego, CA 92103
May 2000 Historical Assessment of the 501-503, 507 and 509 14th Street Residences, San Diego, CA
May 2000 The San Diego Flume Company System Redwood Pipeline, San Diego County, CA
March 2000 Historical Assessment of The Society for Crippled Children’s Hydrotherapy Gymnasium Located at 851 South 35
th Street, San Diego, CA 92113

*Visit www.urbanapreservation.com
for project profiles and additional information.

City Council
41 –
197
12/20/2022

Affidavit Regarding Community Meeting
I, Brian Leung, declare as follows:

1. This declaration is made on behalf of Greenlaw Partners, pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-153. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below and am able to competently testify thereto. I am available, on behalf of Greenlaw Partners, to answer any questions regarding the matters discussed herein.

2. The community meeting required by Section 1-153 was held by Greenlaw Partners, in compliance with Section 2-153, on July 8, 2021 from 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm in an online virtual environment (Zoom Video).

3. Notice of the meeting was mailed to all property owners, and at least one occupant per dwelling unit having a valid United States Postal Service address within a 500-foot radius of the project site, on June 28, 2021.

4. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and restrictions to in person gatherings, the community meeting was hosted online via Zoom. No physical notice posting at the project site was required by the City.

5. Notice of the meeting was published in the Orange County Reporter, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Santa Ana, on July 7, 2021.

6. Meeting minutes were prepared by Kimley-Horn that provide an accurate description and summary of the meeting.

7. The meeting was conducted in an open house format, but began with opening remarks from the developer, as well as a question and answer session. A true and correct copy of the video of the opening remarks, including questions from the public and answers thereto were shared with the City of Santa Ana Staff Planner.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this date of July 13, 2021, at Orange, California.

Brain Leung

City Council
41 –
198
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Virtual Sunshine Neighborhood Community Meeting
1700 Garry Avenue Light Industrial Development Project
Held Thursday July 8, 2021 at 6 PM (via Zoom)
Hosted by: Greenlaw Partners, AO (Architects Orange), and Kimley-Horn and Associates In compliance with the Sunshine Ordinance, a community meeting was held virtually on July 8th, 2021 from 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm.

Representatives from the Developer were as follows:
• Derek Meddings (Greenlaw Partners)
• Rob Mitchell (Greenlaw Partners)
• Steve Przybylowski (AO)
• Brian Leung (Kimley-Horn)
• Nick Chen (Kimley-Horn)
• Kiana Graham (Kimley-Horn)
Representatives from the City of Santa Ana:
• Ali Pezeshkpour (assigned Case Planner)
Representatives of the Community:
• Tim Rushmore
• David Sahban
• David
• Scott
• Garry Plaza Office Park
• Pat Regan
• Fabiola Melicher
• Maggie
• J
• JB
• Thomas E Bradfield

Eleven members of the community attended the virtual meeting. Kimley Horn waited for additional members of the community to log into the virtual meeting before starting the presentation. The represent ative from AO presented an overview of the project . Several questions were written into the chat box and asked verbally during the comments and questions portion. These questions are documented below. No additional membe rs of the community attended the event. All representatives from the City and Developer team stayed on the virtual meeting with the attendees until 7 pm.

Community Questions and Comments

1. Chat Question: What is the timeline for evicting current tenants and demolishing the buildings?

City Council
41 –
199
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Verbal Response: There is no set timeline as of now, we are still in the application process with the City. Once we have gotten the approvals, which we estimate to be about six months from now, we will look at setting some dates and timelines.

2. Chat Question: How many trucks a day?
Verbal Response: Since there are currently no tenants for the building as of now and we are still going through with our approvals to spec build the building, we don’t know the what the hours of operation are and what they might entail until we get a tenant in the building.

3. Chat Question: San Clemente facility similar size 11 per day not 2 Verbal Response: This is about an Amazon site that Greenlaw is involved with in San Clemente. This project is not an Amazon location and Amazon will not be a tenant.

Verbal Comments and Discussion: Participant comment about if this is a similar size facility, wouldn’t the truck frequency match that of the Amazon location.

Verbal Response: Rob of Greenlaw responded that this is not an Amazon project, nor affiliated with a sub-contractor of Amazon. They do not know who the tenant will be and have no prospects at the time of this meeting.

Verbal Comments and Discussion: Participant comment about the location of the pin on the flyer and possible exclusion of nearby tenants due to the pin being to the right and not in the center.

Verbal Response: The developer’s response is that they are willing to set up any future calls or meetings for anyone who may have been missed in proximity due to the pin location on the flyer. The developer was not aware of how the pin was placed on the flyer or any details about the pin.

Verbal Comments and Discussion: Discussion about the orientation and location of the docks for the trucks in the proposed development.

Verbal Response: The developer explained the reasoning behind the location of the docks and their consideration of the views of the freeway.

Verbal Comments and Discussion: Community participant had c oncerns about trucks on the nearby streets. Community participant concern about the zone change from office to light industrial, specifically concerns about the easement in place.

City Council
41 –
200
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Verbal Response: The developer explained that t he plan was always to tear down the building. Originally the plan was to put in residentia l units, but due to the change in market, the developer moved to light industri al. Community participant is opposed to the construction of light development and would like other uses to be explored.

Greenlaw has another meeting set with the commenters to discuss further.

4. Chat Question: What hours will the trucks be arriving at the site? Response: This was discussed in the above question regarding how many trucks per day. There is no tenant identified yet , therefore the Developer cannot speculate on hours of operation.

5. Chat Question: Is Kimley Horn preparing the CEQA?
Verbal Response: Ali, the planner responsible for reviewing this project responded that no, Kimley -Horn would not be preparing the environmental documents for the project. The City will hire its own consultant to prepare the environment al documentation that is required. The developer will pay for the City’s time and reimburse them for it, but the environmental document will be prepared by someone independent of the developer.

Question during discussion asking Ali if he plans to stay on this project, to which Ali responds that he has no intent to leave the City.

6. Chat Question: When will this project start?
Verbal Response: The project will not start until city approval, whi ch is at least 6 months. At least a year out from starting construction.

7. Chat Question: How many trucks will be parking on the street, could the trucks arrive on Alton?
Verbal Response: The developer responded and said they are unsure of what the truck routes are at this time. They have started the process of conducting a traffic study, but it is not complete and so they cannot answer that question right now.

8. Chat Question: Will the tenants be notified with enough amicable time of move out? Verbal Response: The tenants will be notified o nce the City gives their approval for the project, which is probably six months out. The developer has been in contact with the tenants and are trying to give ample notice.

9. Chat Question: Does the widening of the 55-freeway project impact your project?

City Council
41 –
201
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Verbal Response: No, this was already taken into account in the project’s plans.

10. Chat Question: How long does the environmental phase typically take for projects like this?
Verbal Response: Environmental documentation depend s on the type of documentation required for the project. The City will determine what environmental documents are needed. If a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration is needed, the process should take a few months. If an Environmental Impac t Report was needed the process is expected to take an additional six to nine months.

11. Verbal Question: Will you do any extensive traffic studies to address nearby streets backing up?
Verbal Response: There are intensive traffic studies underway. The use that we are proposing is less trips than the current use and therefore will create less traffic. The traffic studies will be available once they are completed.

12. Verbal Question: How are you going to have less trips? Verbal Response: Less people (working at the project site location) will create less trips.

13. Verbal Question: How many dock doors do you expect? Verbal Response: There are 11 dock positions.

14. Verbal Question: Are you going to allow shipping containers on the property? Verbal Response: Currently there is no provision for trailer storage.

15. Verbal Question: Is it going to become a tow yard?
Verbal Response: It is not the intent that this development becomes a tow yard, it is supposed to be light industrial.

16. Verbal Question: Is there a way to get a copy of this presentation? Verbal Response: Yes, this is being recorded and will be available on the project website.

City Council
41 –
202
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Radius notification letters:

Notice mailers were distributed to nearby property owners within a 500-foot radius. Several letters were returned to the development team for s everal reasons, including addresses to vacant tenant offices and letters returned to sender that were unable to be forwarded. See attached Table 1 and Table 2 for complete list of returned notices.

City Council
41 –
203
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

List of Notices Returned to Sender – Vacant
Parcel
Number
First Owner
Full Name Mailing Address
Mailing
Address
City/State
Mailing
Address
Zip
Use Code
430-
191-12
NKMAX

AMERICA
INC
10 PASTEUR IRVINE CA 92618 IMSC
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 102 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 104 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 114 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 115 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 207 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 208 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 209 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 210 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 211 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 212 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 215 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 220 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 225 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 228 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 236 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 103 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
204
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 113 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 201 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 202 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 203 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 204 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 207 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 208 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 209 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 211 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 212 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 213 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 216 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 220 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 222 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 223 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 224 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 228 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 232 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 233 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 114 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
205
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 118 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 203 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 205 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 210 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 215 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 216 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 217 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 222 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 226 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 227 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 230 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 233 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 234 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 235 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 236 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
173-04 OCCUPANT 2933 PULLMAN
ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
173-10 OCCUPANT 2923 PULLMAN
ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
173-16 OCCUPANT 2938 DAIMLER
ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
173-18 OCCUPANT 2952 DAIMLER
ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
411 OCCUPANT 1800 E GARRY
AVE 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
206
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

930-01-
420 OCCUPANT 1800 E GARRY
AVE 202 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
429 OCCUPANT 1800 E GARRY
AVE 211 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
437 OCCUPANT 1800 E GARRY
AVE 219 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
445 OCCUPANT 1820 E GARRY
AVE 103A SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
446 OCCUPANT 1820 E GARRY
AVE 104A SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
447 OCCUPANT 1820 E GARRY
AVE 105A SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
461 OCCUPANT 1820 E GARRY
AVE 201D SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
481 OCCUPANT 1820 E GARRY
AVE 221D SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
411-
142-13

HW-DYER
LLC
4100

MACARTHUR
BLVD 310

NEWPORT
BEACH CA 92660 IMSC

List of Notices Returned to Sender – Unclaimed
Parcel
Number
First Owner
Full Name
Mailing
Address
Mailing
Address
City/State
Mailing
Address Zip Use Code
930-01-
417 OCCUPANT
1800 E

GARRY AVE
117
SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-173-
21 OCCUPANT 1801 E
GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-191-
13 OCCUPANT 3009
DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 INDUSTRIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
412 OCCUPANT
1800 E

GARRY AVE
112
SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
414 OCCUPANT
1800 E

GARRY AVE
114
SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
405
REGAN

DISTRIBUTORS
INC
1800 E

GARRY AVE
105
SANTA ANA CA 92705 CMSC

City Council
41 –
207
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

List of Notices Returned to Sender – Not Known
Parcel
Number
First Owner Full
Name
Mailing
Address
Mailing
Address
City/State
Mailing
Address
Zip
Use Code
930-01-
446 MELINDA WELLS
1835

NEWPORT
BLVD A109

COSTA MESA
CA 92627 CMSC
930-01-
470
GARRY

INVESTMENTS LLC
1212 N

BROADWAY
204

SANTA ANA
CA 92701 CMSC
411-
142-04 OCCUPANT 2907 S TECH

CENTER DR

SANTA ANA
CA 92705

INDUSTRIAL

MISCELLANEOU
S
411-
142-09 OCCUPANT 2909 S TECH

CENTER DR

SANTA ANA
CA 92705

INDUSTRIAL

MISCELLANEOU
S
430-
171-07

ORANGE CNTY

TRANSPORTATION
AUT
1720 E

GARRY AVE

SANTA ANA
CA 92705 CMSC
411-
141-05

ORANGE COUNTY
FLOOD
300 N FLOWER
ST

SANTA ANA
CA 92703 MGOV
411-
142-05 YEUNG 2923 S TECH

CENTER DR

SANTA ANA
CA 92705 IMSC

City Council
41 –
208
12/20/2022

1700 GARRY AVENUE

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL

DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT
Thursday July 8, 2021, at 6 PM
Virtual Sunshine Neighborhood Community Meeting
Hosted by: Greenlaw Partners, AO (Architects Orange), and Kimley-Horn and Associates

City Council
41 –
209
12/20/2022

Agenda
-Project Background
-Existing Conditions
-Proposed Project
-Next Steps
-Q/A

City Council
41 –
210
12/20/2022

PROJECT BACKGROUND

City Council
41 –
211
12/20/2022

REGIONAL

CONTEXT

City Council
41 –
212
12/20/2022

LOCAL

CONTEXT

City Council
41 –
213
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS

City Council
41 –
214
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS
▪Address: 1700 Garry
Avenue
▪APN: 430-171-07
▪5.13-acre site
▪3 separate, two-story
office park buildings
▪Approximately 53,000
building SF
▪Primarily surface parking
▪Typical ornamental
landscaping
Aerial View from South

City Council
41 –
215
12/20/2022

View from Garry Avenue,
looking south toward
existing office buildings
EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW

City Council
41 –
216
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
View within parking lot,
looking west toward the
1740 Garry Avenue
Building

City Council
41 –
217
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
View within parking lot,
looking north toward
Garry Avenue. SR-55 on
the west

City Council
41 –
218
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
Internal site view from
parking lot, looking north
toward 1700 Garry Avenue
building

City Council
41 –
219
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
View from SR-55, looking
east toward project site

City Council
41 –
220
12/20/2022

PROPOSED PROJECT

City Council
41 –
221
12/20/2022

One light industrial flex building with
demising wall for online e-commerce “last
mile” deliveries
Hours of operation – 24 hours a day, 7 days a
week
Most deliveries to occur during the day
User A and User B = 93,900 total building SF
User A– 5,000 SF office space and 37,900 SF
warehouse
User B– 5,000 SF office space and 46,000 SF
warehouse

PROPOSED PROJECT

City Council
41 –
222
12/20/2022

General Plan Amendment: Professional
and Administrative Office (PAO) to
Industrial
Zone Change: Professional to M1 (Light
Industrial)
Development Project Review

ENTITLEMENTS

City Council
41 –
223
12/20/2022

43.5 ft maximum building
height
39 ft height average
43 percent Floor Area Ratio

40.7 percent lot coverage
140 parking spaces (1.5
spaces/1,000 SF)

ELEVATIONS

City Council
41 –
224
12/20/2022

MATERIAL
BOARD

City Council
41 –
225
12/20/2022

SCREEN WALL ELEVATIONS

City Council
41 –
226
12/20/2022

SCREEN WALL ELEVATIONS

City Council
41 –
227
12/20/2022

Landscape Plans
All existing trees would be
removed or relocated
Several existing landscaping
buffers would be replaced
with a new planting schedule

City Council
41 –
228
12/20/2022

Plant Schedule,
Hardscapes, and
Site Furnishings

City Council
41 –
229
12/20/2022

NEXT STEPS

City Council
41 –
230
12/20/2022

NEXT STEPS
• City reviews Development Review Application and
plans
• Environmental Review under CEQA required
• Future Public Noticing and Public Hearings
• Approvals and Permitting Process
• Construction anticipated 2023

City Council
41 –
231
12/20/2022

Comments and
Questions?

City Council
41 –
232
12/20/2022

Contact Information
DEREK MEDDINGS - (949) 309 -1322

GREENLAW PARTNERS

City Council
41 –
233
12/20/2022

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
OR#
~SINCE 1921~
To the right is a copy of the notice you sent to us for publication in the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER. Thank you for using our newspaper. Please read this notice carefully and call us with any corrections. The Proof of Publication will be filed with the County Clerk, if required, and mailed to you after the last date below. Publication date(s) for this notice is (are):

Daily Journal Corporation
Serving your legal advertising needs throughout California.

Mailing Address : 600 W SANTA ANA BLVD, SANTA ANA, CA 92701 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841
Visit us @ www.LegalAdstore.com
Kiana Graham

KIMLEY HORN
1100 W TOWN AND COUNTRY ROAD,700
ORANGE, CA 92868

GPN GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE
1700 Garry Ave_Flyer
07/07/2021
ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, SANTA ANA (714) 543-2027
BUSINESS JOURNAL, RIVERSIDE (951) 784-0111
DAILY COMMERCE, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300
LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL, LOS ANGELES (213) 229-5300
SAN FRANCISCO DAILY JOURNAL, SAN FRANCISCO (800) 640-4829 SAN JOSE POST-RECORD, SAN JOSE (408) 287-4866
THE DAILY RECORDER, SACRAMENTO (916) 444-2355
THE DAILY TRANSCRIPT, SAN DIEGO (619) 232-3486
THE INTER-CITY EXPRESS, OAKLAND (510) 272-4747
Notice Type:

Ad Description

COPY OF NOTICE
3488629
!A000005765297!
An invoice will be sent after the last date of publication. If you prepaid this order in full, you will not receive an invoice.

City Council
41 –
234
12/20/2022

Parcel Number First Owner Full Name
#10701 6/28/2021
430-171-07 ORANGE CNTY TRANSPORTATION AUT
411-141-05 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD
411-141-06 WAN CHAN
411-142-02 WINCHESTER EQUITY GROUP LLC
411-142-03 CHUCK WU
411-142-04 WINCHESTER EQUITY GROUP LLC
411-142-05 YEUNG
411-142-06 YEUNG
411-142-07 2919 TECH CENTER DRIVE LLC
411-142-08 ANTHONY M CARLINI
411-142-09 DALEO ENTERPRISES
411-142-10 WOJCIECH SMOLENSKI
411-142-11 KSDG LLC
411-142-12 FRZ CORP INC
411-142-13 HW-DYER LLC
411-152-09 FIRST INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES LLC
430-112-06 GAGOS PROPERTIES LTD
430-112-07 SIXTH & VERMONT INVESTMENT CO LL
430-114-06 EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
430-114-07 17072 DAIMLER LLC
430-115-01, 03 JOHN WASHER
430-115-02 IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
430-115-04 JUNE EKLUND
430-115-05 RJV & ASSOCIATES LLC
430-171-05 DUPLO U S A CORP
430-171-07 ORANGE CNTY TRANSPORTATION AUT
430-173-02 OPEN DOORS WITH BROTHER ANDREW I
430-173-04 MAM PROPERTIES LLC
430-173-05 WOODLEY BUSINESS PROPERTIES LLC
430-173-06 ALBERT HANNA
430-173-07 MAM PROPERTIES LLC
430-173-10 ACCORD HOLDINGS LLC
430-173-11 SCOTT A LISSOY
430-173-15 CGMC LLC
430-173-16 FREDERICK M MYERS
430-173-17, 18 DAHL TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES CONSTRU
430-173-19 TRITON PROPERTIES LLC
430-173-20 GRANITE PROPERTIES LLC
430-173-21 LISSOY SCOTT A THE LISSOY FAMILY
430-173-22 1751 EAST GARRY LLC
430-191-12 NKMAX AMERICA INC

City Council
41 –
235
12/20/2022

430-191-13 EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
930-01-401, 402, 403, 404, 409 JACK STEVENS
930-01-405 REGAN DISTRIBUTORS INC
930-01-406 REGAN DISTRIBUTORS INC
930-01-407 THOMAS LINDAHL
930-01-408 TRUSTAT SAFETY & HEALTH SOURCE L
930-01-410 1800 E GARRY AVE LLC
930-01-411 REGAN DISTRIBUTORS INC
930-01-412, 464 PACIFIC LOAN SOLUTIONS LLC
930-01-413, 414, 415, 416 JACK STEVENS
930-01-417, 429, 432, 478, 481 WM STEVENS
930-01-418, 419, 420, 421, 422 JACK STEVENS
930-01-423 DAVID KUHN
930-01-424 FLAGSTONE PROPERTIES LLC
930-01-425, 427, 431, 433 - 438 JACK STEVENS
930-01-426 OCEANLINK SHIPPING LOGISTICS
930-01-428 EHAB S SOLIMAN
930-01-430 ULADZISLAU KANDYBOVICH
930-01-439 CHRISTOPHER TRENT
930-01-440, 441, 442 JACK STEVENS
930-01-443, 444, 445 DAVID C RUSHMORE
930-01-446 MELINDA WELLS
930-01-447 - 453 JACK STEVENS
930-01-454 RAYMOND S LEE
930-01-455, 456, 457, 458, 466 JACK STEVENS
930-01-459, 472 PARISA MOGHADDAM
930-01-460 KHA INVESTMENTS LLC
930-01-461 KEYSTONE EQUITY GROUP INC
930-01-462 AJJA INVESTMENTS LLC
930-01-463, 465 GREWALL LLC
930-01-467 RUSSAMEL INVESTMENTS
930-01-468 RAY NAGHIBI
930-01-469 ELIZABETH ORTIZ
930-01-470 GARRY INVESTMENTS LLC
930-01-471 PEBBLE BEACH HOLDING LLC
930-01-473, 475, 480, 482, 483 JACK STEVENS
930-01-474 AGGARWAL DEV DARSH
930-01-475, 480, 482, 483 JACK STEVENS
930-01-476 LOUIS L LAU
930-01-477 SUNRISE REALTY LLC
930-01-479 WADE KIRK
930-01-484 ADDIS PHARMA TECH CORP
939-64-001 ZEBRA INVESTMENTS LLC
939-64-002 800 E DYER RD LLC
411-141-05 VACANT
411-141-06 VACANT
411-142-02 OCCUPANT

City Council
41 –
236
12/20/2022

411-142-03 OCCUPANT
411-142-04 OCCUPANT
411-142-05 OCCUPANT
411-142-06 OCCUPANT
411-142-07 OCCUPANT
411-142-08 OCCUPANT
411-142-09 OCCUPANT
411-142-10 OCCUPANT
411-142-11 OCCUPANT
411-142-12 OCCUPANT
411-142-12 OCCUPANT
411-142-13 VACANT
411-152-09 OCCUPANT
430-112-06 OCCUPANT
430-112-07 OCCUPANT
430-114-06 VACANT
430-114-07 OCCUPANT
430-115-01 OCCUPANT
430-115-02 VACANT
430-115-03 OCCUPANT
430-115-04 OCCUPANT
430-115-05 OCCUPANT
430-171-05 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT

City Council
41 –
237
12/20/2022

430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT

City Council
41 –
238
12/20/2022

430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT

City Council
41 –
239
12/20/2022

430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-171-07 OCCUPANT
430-173-02 OCCUPANT
430-173-04 OCCUPANT
430-173-05 OCCUPANT
430-173-05 OCCUPANT
430-173-06 OCCUPANT
430-173-07 OCCUPANT
430-173-10 OCCUPANT
430-173-10 OCCUPANT
430-173-11 OCCUPANT
430-173-15 OCCUPANT
430-173-16 OCCUPANT
430-173-17 OCCUPANT
430-173-18 OCCUPANT
430-173-19 OCCUPANT
430-173-20 OCCUPANT
430-173-21 OCCUPANT
430-173-22 OCCUPANT
430-191-12 OCCUPANT
430-191-13 OCCUPANT
930-01-401 OCCUPANT

City Council
41 –
240
12/20/2022

930-01-402 OCCUPANT
930-01-403 OCCUPANT
930-01-404 OCCUPANT
930-01-405 OCCUPANT
930-01-406 OCCUPANT
930-01-407 OCCUPANT
930-01-408 OCCUPANT
930-01-409 OCCUPANT
930-01-410 OCCUPANT
930-01-411 OCCUPANT
930-01-412 OCCUPANT
930-01-413 OCCUPANT
930-01-414 OCCUPANT
930-01-415 OCCUPANT
930-01-416 OCCUPANT
930-01-417 OCCUPANT
930-01-418 OCCUPANT
930-01-419 OCCUPANT
930-01-420 OCCUPANT
930-01-421 OCCUPANT
930-01-422 OCCUPANT
930-01-423 OCCUPANT
930-01-424 OCCUPANT
930-01-425 OCCUPANT
930-01-426 OCCUPANT
930-01-427 OCCUPANT
930-01-428 OCCUPANT
930-01-429 OCCUPANT
930-01-430 OCCUPANT
930-01-431 OCCUPANT
930-01-432 OCCUPANT
930-01-433 OCCUPANT
930-01-434 OCCUPANT
930-01-435 OCCUPANT
930-01-436 OCCUPANT
930-01-437 OCCUPANT
930-01-438 OCCUPANT
930-01-439 OCCUPANT
930-01-440 OCCUPANT
930-01-441 OCCUPANT
930-01-442 OCCUPANT
930-01-443 OCCUPANT
930-01-444 OCCUPANT
930-01-445 OCCUPANT
930-01-446 OCCUPANT
930-01-447 OCCUPANT
930-01-448 OCCUPANT

City Council
41 –
241
12/20/2022

930-01-449 OCCUPANT
930-01-450 OCCUPANT
930-01-451 OCCUPANT
930-01-452 OCCUPANT
930-01-453 OCCUPANT
930-01-454 OCCUPANT
930-01-455 OCCUPANT
930-01-456 OCCUPANT
930-01-457 OCCUPANT
930-01-458 OCCUPANT
930-01-459 OCCUPANT
930-01-460 OCCUPANT
930-01-461 OCCUPANT
930-01-462 OCCUPANT
930-01-463 OCCUPANT
930-01-464 OCCUPANT
930-01-465 OCCUPANT
930-01-466 OCCUPANT
930-01-467 OCCUPANT
930-01-468 OCCUPANT
930-01-469 OCCUPANT
930-01-470 OCCUPANT
930-01-471 OCCUPANT
930-01-472 OCCUPANT
930-01-473 OCCUPANT
930-01-474 OCCUPANT
930-01-475 OCCUPANT
930-01-476 OCCUPANT
930-01-477 OCCUPANT
930-01-478 OCCUPANT
930-01-479 OCCUPANT
930-01-480 OCCUPANT
930-01-481 OCCUPANT
930-01-482 OCCUPANT
930-01-483 OCCUPANT
930-01-484 OCCUPANT
939-64-001 OCCUPANT
939-64-002 OCCUPANT

City Council
41 –
242
12/20/2022

Mailing Address Mailing Address City/State Mailing Address Zip 500' Ownership Listing 500' Occupant Listing Prepared for:
1720 E GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
300 N FLOWER ST SANTA ANA CA 92703
201 W GARVEY AVE 102 MONTEREY PARK CA 91754
19365 COUNTRYWOOD DR YORBA LINDA CA 92886
3460 WINCHESTER WAY ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748
3460 WINCHESTER WAY ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748
2923 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
3030 PULLMAN ST COSTA MESA CA 92626
2919 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
PO BOX 12649 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658
PO BOX 2834 ORANGE CA 92859
16787 BEACH BLVD 308 HUNTINGTON BEACH CA 92647
2913 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2915 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
4100 MACARTHUR BLVD 310 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
2530 S BIRCH ST SANTA ANA CA 92707
1319 J ST MODESTO CA 95354
1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS 2475 LOS ANGELES CA 90067
PO BOX 11150 SANTA ANA CA 92711
17072 DAIMLER ST IRVINE CA 92614
1100 SANDPIPER DR CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625
15600 SAND CANYON AVE IRVINE CA 92618
1121 DURYEA AVE IRVINE CA 92614
1167 WARNER AVE TUSTIN CA 92780
3050 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
550 S MAIN ST ORANGE CA 92868
2953 PULLMAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2913 PULLMAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
4201 PRESERVE PKWY N GREENWOOD VILLAGE CO 80121
4 HUTTON CENTRE DR 500 SANTA ANA CA 92707
1601 PORT STIRLING PL NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
19642 VISTA DEL VALLE SANTA ANA CA 92705
2922 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2932 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
19211 EDGEHILL DR IRVINE CA 92603
2960 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2942 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
1811 E GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
2922 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
1751 E GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
10 PASTEUR IRVINE CA 92618

City Council
41 –
243
12/20/2022

1 EDWARDS WAY IRVINE CA 92614
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
1800 E GARRY AVE 105 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 106 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1448 CHARLESTON ST TUSTIN CA 92782
1800 E GARRY AVE 108 SANTA ANA CA 92705
3857 BIRCH ST 195 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
1800 E GARRY AVE 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705
2515 DUKE PL COSTA MESA CA 92626
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
PO BOX 5505 ORANGE CA 92863
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
23265 BUCKLAND LN LAKE FOREST CA 92630
1800 E GARRY AVE 206 SANTA ANA CA 92705
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
1800 E GARRY AVE 208 SANTA ANA CA 92705
18529 PETERS CT FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708
2618 SAN MIGUEL DR 295 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660
1212 AVIATOR LN TUSTIN CA 92782
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
100 VIA FLORENCE NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663
1835 NEWPORT BLVD A109 COSTA MESA CA 92627
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
25222 MAMMOTH CIR EL TORO CA 92630
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
PO BOX 17613 IRVINE CA 92623
2102 BUSINESS CENTER DR 130 IRVINE CA 92612
2729 SATURN ST BREA CA 92821
13681 NEWPORT AVE 8 TUSTIN CA 92780
751 S WEIR CANYON RD 157 ANAHEIM CA 92808
2235 E FLAMINGO RD 152 LAS VEGAS NV 89119
5938 TURNBERRY DR BANNING CA 92220
3152 HIDEOUT LN CORONA CA 92882
1212 N BROADWAY 204 SANTA ANA CA 92701
1820 E GARRY AVE 211C SANTA ANA CA 92705
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
40 GOLF DR ALISO VIEJO CA 92656
PO BOX 4009 ORANGE CA 92863
3209 E LONGRIDGE DR ORANGE CA 92867
27702 CROWN VALLEY PKWY D4 MISSION VIEJO CA 92694
6 ROCKROSE ALISO VIEJO CA 92656
1820 E GARRY AVE 224D SANTA ANA CA 92705
810 E DYER RD 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705
3631 S HARBOR BLVD 130 SANTA ANA CA 92704
2903 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
244
12/20/2022

2905 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2907 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2923 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2921 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2919 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2917 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2909 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2911 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2913 S TECH CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705
2915 S TECH CENTER DR STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705
2915 S TECH CENTER DR STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705
3131 S STANDARD AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
17092 PULLMAN ST IRVINE CA 92614
1132 DURYEA AVE IRVINE CA 92614
17072 DAIMLER ST IRVINE CA 92614
1021 DURYEA AVE IRVINE CA 92614
1091 DURYEA AVE IRVINE CA 92614
1121 DURYEA AVE IRVINE CA 92614
17031 DAIMLER ST IRVINE CA 92614
3050 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 101 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 102 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 103 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 104 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 105 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 106 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 107 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 108 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 109 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 110 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 113 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 114 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 115 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 117 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 118 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 119 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 201 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 202 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 203 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 204 SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
245
12/20/2022

1720 E GARRY AVE STE 205 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 206 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 207 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 208 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 209 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 210 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 211 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 212 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 213 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 214 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 215 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 220 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 223 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 225 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 228 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 229 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 231 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 232 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 233 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 234 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 235 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 236 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 101 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 102 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 103 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 104 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 105 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 106 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 107 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 108 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 109 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 110 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 113 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 114 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 115 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 117 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 118 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 119 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 201 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 202 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 203 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 204 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 205 SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
246
12/20/2022

1740 E GARRY AVE STE 206 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 207 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 208 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 209 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 210 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 211 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 212 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 213 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 214 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 215 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 216 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 220 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 221 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 222 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 223 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 224 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 226 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 227 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 228 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 230 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 231 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 232 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 233 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 234 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 235 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 236 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 101 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 102 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 103 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 104 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 105 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 106 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 107 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 108 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 109 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 110 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 113 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 114 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 115 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 117 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 118 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 119 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 120 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 201 SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
247
12/20/2022

1700 E GARRY AVE STE 202 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 203 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 204 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 205 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 206 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 207 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 210 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 211 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 212 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 213 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 214 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 215 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 216 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 217 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 218 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 219 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 222 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 224 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 226 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 227 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 230 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 231 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 232 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 233 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 234 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 235 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 236 SANTA ANA CA 92705
2953 PULLMAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2933 PULLMAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2943 PULLMAN ST STE A SANTA ANA CA 92705
2943 PULLMAN ST STE B SANTA ANA CA 92705
1761 E GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
2913 PULLMAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2923 PULLMAN ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2923 PULLMAN ST STE C SANTA ANA CA 92705
2922 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2932 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2938 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2960 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2952 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
2942 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
1811 E GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
1801 E GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
1751 E GARRY AVE SANTA ANA CA 92705
3001 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
3009 DAIMLER ST SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 101 SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
248
12/20/2022

1800 E GARRY AVE 102 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 103 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 104 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 105 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 106 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 107 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 108 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 109 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 110 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 111 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 112 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 113 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 114 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 115 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 116 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 117 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 118 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 201 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 202 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 203 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 204 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 205 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 206 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 207 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 208 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 209 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 210 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 211 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 212 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 213 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 214 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 215 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 216 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 217 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 218 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 219 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 220 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 221 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 222 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 223 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1800 E GARRY AVE 224 SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 101A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 102A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 103A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 104A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 105A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 106A SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
249
12/20/2022

1820 E GARRY AVE 107A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 108B SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 109B SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 110A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 111A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 112A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 113A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 114A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 115A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 116A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 117B SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 118A SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 201D SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 202D SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 203C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 204C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 205C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 206C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 207D SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 208E SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 209C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 210C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 211C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 212C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 213E SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 214E SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 215F SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 216C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 217C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 218C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 219C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 220E SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 221D SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 222C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 223C SANTA ANA CA 92705
1820 E GARRY AVE 224D SANTA ANA CA 92705
810 E DYER RD 1 SANTA ANA CA 92705
800 E DYER RD 2 SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
250
12/20/2022

Use Code
CMSC
MGOV
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
MGOV
IMSC
IMSC
IMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
IMSC

City Council
41 –
251
12/20/2022

IMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC
CMSC

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
252
12/20/2022

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

GOVERNMENTAL, PUBLIC

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
253
12/20/2022

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
254
12/20/2022

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
255
12/20/2022

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

INDUSTRIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
256
12/20/2022

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
257
12/20/2022

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

COMMERCIAL MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
258
12/20/2022

Affidavit Regarding Community Meeting
I, Brian Leung, declare as follows:

1. This declaration is made on behalf of Greenlaw Partners, pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code Section 2-153. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth below and am able to competently testify thereto. I am available, on behalf of Greenlaw Partners, to answer any questions regarding the matters discussed herein.

2. The community meeting required by Section 1-153 was held by Greenlaw Partners, in compliance with Section 2-153, on October 5, 2021 from 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm in an online virtual environment (Zoom Video).

3. Notice of the meeting was mailed to all property owners, and at least one occupant per dwelling unit having a valid United States Postal Service address within a 500-foot radius of the project site, on September 29, 2021.

4. Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic and restrictions to in person gatherings, the community meeting was hosted online via Zoom. No physical notice posting at the project site was required by the City.

5. Notice of the meeting was published in the Orange County Reporter, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Santa Ana, on September 29, 2021.

6. Meeting minutes were prepared by Kimley-Horn that provide an accurate description and summary of the meeting.

7. The meeting was conducted in an open house format, but began with opening remarks from the developer, as well as a question-and-answer session. A true and correct copy of the video of the opening remarks, including questions from the public and answers thereto were shared with the City of Santa Ana Staff Planner.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this date of October 8, 2021, at Orange, California.

Brain Leung

City Council
41 –
259
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Virtual Sunshine Neighborhood Community Meeting
1700 Garry Avenue Light Industrial Development Project
Held Thursday October 5, 2021 at 6 PM (via Zoom)
Hosted by: Greenlaw Partners, AO (Architects Orange), and Kimley-Horn and Associates In compliance with the Sunshine Ordinance, a community meeting was held virtually on October 5th, 2021 from 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm.

Representatives from the Developer were as follows:
• Derek Meddings (Greenlaw Partners)
• Rob Mitchell (Greenlaw Partners)
• Steve Przybylowski (AO)
• Michael Lepore (Kimley-Horn)
• Nick Chen (Kimley-Horn)

Representatives from the City of Santa Ana:
• Ali Pezeshkpour (assigned Case Planner)
Representatives of the Community:
• Tim Rushmore
• Leslie
• Shoshin U.S.A.
• Linda Matsunaga
• Garry Plaza Office Park Assoc.
• paper
• Mark
• Jeni (Jeni Bilatout)
• Terry’s iPad
• Unknown 1
• Unknown 2

Eleven members of the community attended the virtual meeting. Kimley Horn waited for additional members of the community to log into the virtual meeting before starting the presentation. The representative from AO presented an overview of the project . Several questions were written into the chat box and asked verbally during the comments and questions portion. These questions are documented below. No additional members of the community attended the event. All representatives from the City and Developer team stayed on the virtual meeting with the attendees until 7 pm.

City Council
41 –
260
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Community Questions and Comments

1. Verbal Question: Will a traffic control device be included in the site plans to prevent trucks from passing through the new building and the neighbor building? Will there be an access point for the water drainage to run off into the Garry Avenue and not drain into the neighboring property?
Verbal Response: Applicant responded that this project is still working on some of the conditions of the project for approval but will make sure that this is included in the discussion and will be considered as part of the review process.

2. Verbal Question: Why is the screening wall eight feet tall, where is it, and does it have wire on the top?
Verbal Response: There will be a ten-foot decorative concrete wall facing north east of the project site. The wall is meant to screen the trucks. The rendering in the PowerPoint included a rendering of a potential future overpass.

3. Verbal Question: Are there buildings as a part of the project? How many employees are you expecting to have?
Verbal Response: Yes, there will be a building, the docks have been changed so that they do not face the surrounding properties. The number of employees is currently unknown since there is no tenant right now but will be similar to an industrial type of property. From a tr affic standpoint, it will be a less intensive use than what is there now.

4. Verbal Question: Concerned about the trucks clogging up the surrounding streets. Is there any way that you can restrict trucks between 4:00pm-6:00pm so that trucks are not getting in the way of current residents getting home? Response: There was an intensive traffic study done to be able to show the influx of trucks for this type of use might be coming and going and it did not show any intensive additional traffic than what was already there. If it does look like this will be an issue with a future tenant, we can sit down and see what can be done. Applicant willing to share the traffic studies.

5. Verbal Question: Are there limitations as to how many trucks or the size of trucks? Verbal Response: There is a capacity issue that the building can be able to hold. This isn’t an Amazon site where there are vans and multiple trips coming in and out of the site. We do not have a tenant so there are no set hours of operation.

City Council
41 –
261
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

6. Verbal Question: Will you specify in the lease how many trucks per hour/day? Verbal Response: At this point in time there are no terms of the lease. There are specifications that the project is required to follow from the City which is what the project is focused on now.

7. Verbal Question: Is there any cross-lot drainage?
Verbal Response: There will be no cross -lot drainage with the storm drain system.

This lot will self-drain and doesn’t rely on any of the properties for drainage.

8. Comment: Ali Pezeshkpour on next steps for the project . The a pplicant has resubmitted plans for approval to the City. The city will soon begin its environmental evaluation. Once the plans are set and the city has no more comments and the environmental documentation is complete, the project will go forward to the Planning Commission and City Counc il for their consideration. The t enants and surrounding neighbors will receive notices of those meetings like they did for this meeting . If the Planning Commission and City Council vote to approve this project, then they will proceed with the necessary permit and plan reviews for construction permits. The applicant is aiming to have this entire process done by 2023. All key dates and updates will be posted on the website , and once dates are selected for the public meetings residents will receive a notice in the mail.

City Council
41 –
262
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

Radius notification letters:

Notice mailers were distributed to nearby property owners within a 500-foot radius. Several letters were returned to the development team for several reasons, including addresses to vacant tenant offices and letters returned to sender that were unable to be forwarded. See attached Table 1 and Table 2 for complete list of returned notices.

City Council
41 –
263
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

List of Notices Returned to Sender – Vacant
Parcel
Number
First Owner
Full Name Mailing Address
Mailing
Address
City/State
Mailing
Address
Zip
Use Code
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 207 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 208 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1720 E GARRY
AVE STE 209 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 204 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 215 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 223 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1740 E GARRY
AVE STE 224 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
430-
171-07 OCCUPANT 1700 E GARRY
AVE STE 217 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
411-
142-13

HW-DYER
LLC
4100

MACARTHUR
BLVD 310

NEWPORT
BEACH CA 92660 INDUSTRIAL

List of Notices Returned to Sender – Not Deliverable as Addressed Parcel
Number
First Owner
Full Name
Mailing
Address
Mailing Address
City/State
Mailing
Address Zip Use Code
930-01-
411 OCCUPANT
1800 E

GARRY AVE
111
SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
930-01-
411 OCCUPANT
1801 E

GARRY AVE
111
SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
264
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 1100 W Town and Country Road | Suite 700, Orange, CA 92868 714 939 1030

List of Notices Returned to Sender – Attempted Not Known Parcel
Number
First Owner
Full Name
Mailing
Address
Mailing Address
City/State
Mailing
Address Zip Use Code
411-142-
04 OCCUPANT 2907 S TECH
CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 INDUSTRIAL
939-64-
002 OCCUPANT 800 E DYER RD
2 SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS
411-142-
02 OCCUPANT 2903 S TECH
CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 INDUSTRIAL
411-142-
09 OCCUPANT 2909 S TECH
CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 INDUSTRIAL
411-142-
05 YEUNG 2923 S TECH
CENTER DR SANTA ANA CA 92705 INDUSTRIAL
430-173-
18 OCCUPANT 2952 DAIMLER
ST SANTA ANA CA 92705 COMMERCIAL

MISCELLANEOUS

City Council
41 –
265
12/20/2022

kimley-horn.com 600 North Pine Island Road | Suite 450, Plantation, FL 33324 954 535 5100

Virtual Sunshine Neighborhood Community Meeting
1700 Garry Avenue Light Industrial Development Project
Held Thursday October 5, 2021 at 6pm
Hosted by: Greenlaw Partners, AO (Architects Orange), and Kimley-Horn and Associates

Zoom Participants
• Nick Chen
• Ali Pezeshkpour
• Derek Meddings
• SteveP
• Leslie
• Tim Rushmore
• Unknown 2
• Shoshin U.S.A.
• Linda Matsunaga
• Rob Mitchell
• Michael.Lepore
• Unknown 2
• Garry Plaza Office Park Assoc.
• Paper
• Mark
• Jeni (Jeni Bilatout)
• Terry’s iPad

City Council
41 –
266
12/20/2022

1700 GARRY AVENUE

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL

DEVELOPMENT

PROJECT
Tuesday October 5, 2021, from 6-7 PM
Virtual Sunshine Neighborhood Community Meeting #2
Hosted by: Greenlaw Partners, AO (Architects Orange), and Kimley-Horn and Associates

City Council
41 –
267
12/20/2022

Agenda
• Project Background
• Community Meeting #1 Recap
• Revised Project
• Next Steps
• Comments and Questions

City Council
41 –
268
12/20/2022

PROJECT BACKGROUND

City Council
41 –
269
12/20/2022

REGIONAL

CONTEXT

City Council
41 –
270
12/20/2022

LOCAL

CONTEXT

City Council
41 –
271
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS
Address: 1700 Garry
Avenue
APN: 430-171-07
5.13-acre site
3 separate, two-story
office park buildings
Approximately 53,000
building SF
Primarily surface parking
Typical ornamental
landscaping
Aerial View from South

City Council
41 –
272
12/20/2022

View from Garry Avenue,
looking south toward
existing office buildings
EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW

City Council
41 –
273
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
View within parking lot,
looking west toward the
1740 Garry Avenue
Building

City Council
41 –
274
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
View within parking lot,
looking north toward
Garry Avenue. SR-55 on
the west

City Council
41 –
275
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
Internal site view from
parking lot, looking north
toward 1700 Garry Avenue
building

City Council
41 –
276
12/20/2022

EXISTING CONDITIONS – ON THE GROUND VIEW
View from SR-55, looking
east toward project site

City Council
41 –
277
12/20/2022

REVISIONS TO PROJECT

City Council
41 –
278
12/20/2022

BUILDING ORIENTATION & BUILDING

FOOTPRINT
RevisedOriginal

City Council
41 –
279
12/20/2022

General Plan Amendment: Professional
and Administrative Office (PAO) to
Industrial
Zone Change: Professional to M1 (Light
Industrial)
Development Project Review

ENTITLEMENTS

City Council
41 –
280
12/20/2022

CONCEPT IMAGES

City Council
41 –
281
12/20/2022

CONCEPT IMAGES

City Council
41 –
282
12/20/2022

CONCEPT IMAGES

City Council
41 –
283
12/20/2022

CONCEPT IMAGES

City Council
41 –
284
12/20/2022

43.5 ft maximum building
height
42 percent Floor Area Ratio

42.9 percent lot coverage
145 parking spaces (1.58
spaces/1,000 SF)

ELEVATIONS

City Council
41 –
285
12/20/2022

MATERIAL
BOARD

City Council
41 –
286
12/20/2022

Landscape Plans
All existing trees would be
removed or relocated
Several existing landscaping
buffers would be replaced
with a new planting schedule

City Council
41 –
287
12/20/2022

LANDSCAPE

ENLARGEMENT
“A”

City Council
41 –
288
12/20/2022

LANDSCAPE

ENLARGEMENT
“B”

City Council
41 –
289
12/20/2022

LANDSCAPE

ENLARGEMENT
“C”

City Council
41 –
290
12/20/2022

Plant Schedule,
Hardscapes, and
Site Furnishings

City Council
41 –
291
12/20/2022

NEXT STEPS
• City reviews Development Review Application and
plans
• Environmental Review under CEQA required
• Future Public Noticing and Public Hearings
• Approvals and Permitting Process
• Construction anticipated 2023

City Council
41 –
292
12/20/2022

Comments and
Questions?

City Council
41 –
293
12/20/2022

Contact Information
DEREK MEDDINGS - (949) 331- 1300

GREENLAW PARTNERS

City Council
41 –
294
12/20/2022

18301 Von Karman Ave Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92612
The Project proposes to replace three existing office park buildings located at 1700 Garry Avenue with one new light industrial flex building. The new proposed uses total approximately 91,500 square feet total. The Project site plan has been revised since the July 8th meeting. Please attend this meeting to provide comments about this proposed development. At the meeting the project team will provide general information, answer questions and solicit input on the proposed project.

WHEN: Tuesday, October 5 at 6-7p.m.

WHERE: Virtual, Z
oom
HOW: To access the workshop
please click the link below:
https://bit.ly/2Y8DsoK

GREENLA W PARTNERS
1700 Garry Avenue Light Industrial Development Project
Community Neighborhood Meeting #2
For questions about the project, please contact Derek Meddings (Greenlaw Partners) at (949) 331-1332.

If you have questions regarding this event or you require language interpretation services in languages other than English, please contact Brian Leung (Kimley-Horn) at (714) 705-1372 The project location and vicinity are highlighted in
red.

PROJECT SITE

City Council
41 –
295
12/20/2022

18301 Von Karman Ave Suite 250, Irvine, CA 92612
El Proyecto propone reemplazar tres edificios de grupos de oficinas existentes ubicados en el 1700 de la Avenida Garry con un nuevo edificio de uso industrial ligero y flexible. El total de los nuevos usos propuestos es de aproximadamente 9,500 pies cuadrados (8,500 metros cuadrados). Se han hecho revisiones al plan del sitio del proyecto desde la reunión del 8 de julio.

Por favor asista a esta reunión para proporcionar sus comentarios acerca de este desarrollo propuesto. En la reunión, el equipo del proyecto le proporcionará información general, contestará sus preguntas y le pedirá que proporcione sus comentarios acerca del proyecto.

FECHA: Martes 5 de octubre
de las 6 a las 7 pm
LUGAR: Virtual, por Zoom
CÓMO: Para obtener acceso al taller
por favor haga clic en el enlace
a continuación:
https://bit.ly/2Y8DsoK

G R E E

N L A W P A R T N E R S
Reunión Comunitaria del Vecindario #2 del Proyecto de
Desarrollo Industrial Ligero en el 1700 de la Avenida Garry Si tiene preguntas acerca del proyecto, por favor comuníquese con Derek Meddings (
Greenlaw Partners) al (949) 331-1332.

Si tiene preguntas acerca de este evento o necesita servicios de interpretación en otros idiomas además del inglés, por favor comuníquese con Biran Leung (Kimley-Horn) al (714) 705-1372 La ubicación y el área del proyecto aparecen
resaltadas en rojo

SITIO DEL PROYECTO

City Council
41 –
296
12/20/2022

 
City Council
 41 – 297
12/20/2022
 

 
City Council
 41 – 298
12/20/2022
 

 
City Council
 41 – 299
12/20/2022
 

 
City Council
 41 – 300
12/20/2022
 

 
City Council
 41 – 301
12/20/2022
 

#10848
9/27/2021

500' Ownership Listing
500' Occupant Listing
Prepared for:

430-171-07

ORANGE CNTY TRANSPORTATION AUT
1720 E GARRY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

Kimley Horn
1100 West Town and Country , Suite 700
Orange CA 92868

411-141-05, 06

ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD
300 N FLOWER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92703

411-142-02

WINCHESTER EQUITY GROUP LLC
19365 COUNTRYWOOD DR
YORBA LINDA CA 92886

411-142-03

CHUCK WU
3460 WINCHESTER WAY
ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748

411-142-04

WINCHESTER EQUITY GROUP LLC
3460 WINCHESTER WAY
ROWLAND HEIGHTS CA 91748

411-142-05
YEUNG
2923 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-06
YEUNG
3030 PULLMAN ST
COSTA MESA CA 92626

411-142-07
2919 TECH CENTER DRIVE LLC
2919 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-08

ANTHONY M CARLINI
PO BOX 12649
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92658

411-142-09

DALEO ENTERPRISES
PO BOX 2834
ORANGE CA 92859

411-142-10

SATC INC
5753 E SANTA ANA CYN
ANAHEIM CA 92807

411-142-11

KSDG LLC
2913 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-12

FRZ CORP INC
2915 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-13

HW-DYER LLC
4100 MACARTHUR BLVD 310
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660

411-152-09

FIRST INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES LLC
2530 S BIRCH ST
SANTA ANA CA 92707

430-112-06

GAGOS PROPERTIES LTD
1319 J ST
MODESTO CA 95354

430-112-07

SIXTH & VERMONT INVESTMENT CO LL
1900 AVENUE OF THE STARS 2475
LOS ANGELES CA 90067

430-114-06

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
PO BOX 11150
SANTA ANA CA 92711

430-114-07
17072 DAIMLER LLC
17072 DAIMLER ST
IRVINE CA 92614

430-115-01, 03

JOHN WASHER
1100 SANDPIPER DR
CORONA DEL MAR CA 92625

430-115-02

IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT
15600 SAND CANYON AVE
IRVINE CA 92618

430-115-04

JUNE EKLUND
1121 DURYEA AVE
IRVINE CA 92614

430-115-05

RJV & ASSOCIATES LLC
1167 WARNER AVE
TUSTIN CA 92780

430-171-05

DUPLO U S A CORP
3050 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

ORANGE CNTY TRANSPORTATION
AUT
550 S MAIN ST
ORANGE CA 92868

City Council
41 –
302
12/20/2022

430-173-02

OPEN DOORS WITH BROTHER

ANDREW I
2953 PULLMAN ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-04

MAM PROPERTIES LLC
2913 PULLMAN ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-05

WOODLEY BUSINESS PROPERTIES LLC
4201 PRESERVE PKWY N
GREENWOOD VILLAGE CO 80121

430-173-06

ALBERT HANNA
4 HUTTON CENTRE DR 500
SANTA ANA CA 92707

430-173-07

MAM PROPERTIES LLC
1601 PORT STIRLING PL
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660

430-173-10

ACCORD HOLDINGS LLC
19642 VISTA DEL VALLE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-11

SCOTT A LISSOY
2922 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-15

CGMC LLC
2932 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-16

MYERS FREDERICK M TR MYERS

FAMILY TR
19211 EDGEHILL DR
IRVINE CA 92603

430-173-17, 18

DAHL TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES

CONSTRU
2960 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-19

TRITON PROPERTIES LLC
2942 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-20

GRANITE PROPERTIES LLC
1811 E GARRY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-21

LISSOY SCOTT A THE LISSOY
FAMILY
2922 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-22
1751 EAST GARRY LLC
1751 E GARRY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-191-12

NKMAX AMERICA INC
10 PASTEUR
IRVINE CA 92618

430-191-13

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 EDWARDS WAY
IRVINE CA 92614

930-01-401, 402, 403, 404, 409

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-405, 406

REGAN DISTRIBUTORS INC
1800 E GARRY AVE 106
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-406

REGAN DISTRIBUTORS INC
1800 E GARRY AVE 106
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-407

THOMAS LINDAHL
1448 CHARLESTON ST
TUSTIN CA 92782

930-01-408

TRUSTAT SAFETY & HEALTH

SOURCE L
1800 E GARRY AVE 108
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-410
1800 E GARRY AVE LLC
3857 BIRCH ST 195
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660

930-01-411

REGAN DISTRIBUTORS INC
1800 E GARRY AVE 111
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-412, 464

PACIFIC LOAN SOLUTIONS LLC
2515 DUKE PL
COSTA MESA CA 92626

930-01-413, 414, 415, 416

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-417, 429, 432, 478, 481

WM STEVENS
PO BOX 5505
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-418, 419, 420, 421, 422

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-423

DAVID KUHN
23265 BUCKLAND LN
LAKE FOREST CA 92630

930-01-424

FLAGSTONE PROPERTIES LLC
1800 E GARRY AVE 206
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-425, 427, 431, 433 - 438

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

City Council
41 –
303
12/20/2022

930-01-426

OCEANLINK SHIPPING LOGISTICS
1800 E GARRY AVE 208
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-428

EHAB S SOLIMAN
18529 PETERS CT
FOUNTAIN VALLEY CA 92708

930-01-430

ULADZISLAU KANDYBOVICH
2618 SAN MIGUEL DR 295
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660

930-01-439

CHRISTOPHER TRENT
1212 AVIATOR LN
TUSTIN CA 92782

930-01-440, 441, 442

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-443, 444, 445

DAVID C RUSHMORE
100 VIA FLORENCE
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92663

930-01-446

MELINDA WELLS
1835 NEWPORT BLVD A109
COSTA MESA CA 92627

930-01-447 - 453

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-454

RAYMOND S LEE
25222 MAMMOTH CIR
EL TORO CA 92630

930-01-455, 456, 457, 458, 466

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-459, 472

PARISA MOGHADDAM
PO BOX 17613
IRVINE CA 92623

930-01-460

KHA INVESTMENTS LLC
2102 BUSINESS CENTER DR 130
IRVINE CA 92612

930-01-461

KEYSTONE EQUITY GROUP INC
2729 SATURN ST
BREA CA 92821

930-01-462

AJJA INVESTMENTS LLC
13681 NEWPORT AVE 8
TUSTIN CA 92780

930-01-463, 465

GREWALL LLC
751 S WEIR CANYON RD 157
ANAHEIM CA 92808

930-01-467

RUSSAMEL INVESTMENTS
2235 E FLAMINGO RD 152
LAS VEGAS NV 89119

930-01-468

RAY NAGHIBI
5938 TURNBERRY DR
BANNING CA 92220

930-01-469

ELIZABETH ORTIZ
3152 HIDEOUT LN
CORONA CA 92882

930-01-470

GARRY INVESTMENTS LLC
1212 N BROADWAY 204
SANTA ANA CA 92701

930-01-471

PEBBLE BEACH HOLDING LLC
1820 E GARRY AVE 211C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-473, 475, 480, 482, 483

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-474

AGGARWAL DEV DARSH
40 GOLF DR
ALISO VIEJO CA 92656

930-01-475, 480, 482, 483

JACK STEVENS
PO BOX 4009
ORANGE CA 92863

930-01-476

LOUIS L LAU
3209 E LONGRIDGE DR
ORANGE CA 92867

930-01-477

SUNRISE REALTY LLC
27702 CROWN VALLEY PKWY D4
MISSION VIEJO CA 92694

930-01-479

WADE KIRK
6 ROCKROSE
ALISO VIEJO CA 92656

930-01-484

ADDIS PHARMA TECH CORP
1820 E GARRY AVE 224D
SANTA ANA CA 92705

939-64-001

ZEBRA INVESTMENTS LLC
810 E DYER RD 1
SANTA ANA CA 92705

939-64-002
800 E DYER RD LLC
3631 S HARBOR BLVD 130
SANTA ANA CA 92704

411-141-05
VACANT

City Council
41 –
304
12/20/2022

411-141-06
VACANT

411-142-02

OCCUPANT
2903 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-03

OCCUPANT
2905 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-04

OCCUPANT
2907 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-05

OCCUPANT
2923 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-06

OCCUPANT
2921 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-07

OCCUPANT
2919 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-08

OCCUPANT
2917 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-09

OCCUPANT
2909 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-10

OCCUPANT
2911 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-11

OCCUPANT
2913 S TECH CENTER DR
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-12

OCCUPANT
2915 S TECH CENTER DR STE A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-12

OCCUPANT
2915 S TECH CENTER DR STE B
SANTA ANA CA 92705

411-142-13
VACANT

411-152-09

OCCUPANT
3131 S STANDARD AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-112-06

OCCUPANT
17092 PULLMAN ST
IRVINE CA 92614

430-112-07

OCCUPANT
1132 DURYEA AVE
IRVINE CA 92614

430-114-06
VACANT

430-114-07

OCCUPANT
17072 DAIMLER ST
IRVINE CA 92614

430-115-01

OCCUPANT
1021 DURYEA AVE
IRVINE CA 92614

430-115-02
VACANT

430-115-03

OCCUPANT
1091 DURYEA AVE
IRVINE CA 92614

430-115-04

OCCUPANT
1121 DURYEA AVE
IRVINE CA 92614

430-115-05

OCCUPANT
17031 DAIMLER ST
IRVINE CA 92614

430-171-05

OCCUPANT
3050 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 101
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 102
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 103
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 104
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 105
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
305
12/20/2022

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 106
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 107
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 108
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 109
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 110
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 111
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 112
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 113
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 114
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 115
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 116
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 117
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 118
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 119
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 120
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 201
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 202
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 203
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 204
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 205
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 206
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 207
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 208
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 209
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 210
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 211
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 212
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 213
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 214
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 215
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
306
12/20/2022

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 220
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 223
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 225
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 228
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 229
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 231
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 232
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 233
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 234
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 235
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1720 E GARRY AVE STE 236
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 101
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 102
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 103
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 104
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 105
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 106
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 107
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 108
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 109
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 110
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 111
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 112
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 113
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 114
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 115
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 116
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 117
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 118
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 119
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
307
12/20/2022

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 120
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 201
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 202
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 203
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 204
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 205
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 206
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 207
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 208
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 209
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 210
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 211
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 212
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 213
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 214
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 215
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 216
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 220
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 221
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 222
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 223
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 224
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 226
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 227
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 228
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 230
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 231
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 232
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 233
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 234
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
308
12/20/2022

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 235
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1740 E GARRY AVE STE 236
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 101
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 102
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 103
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 104
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 105
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 106
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 107
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 108
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 109
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 110
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 111
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 112
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 113
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 114
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 115
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 116
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 117
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 118
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 119
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 120
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 201
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 202
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 203
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 204
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 205
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 206
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 207
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 210
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
309
12/20/2022

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 211
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 212
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 213
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 214
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 215
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 216
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 217
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 218
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 219
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 222
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 224
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 226
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 227
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 230
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 231
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 232
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 233
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 234
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 235
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-171-07

OCCUPANT
1700 E GARRY AVE STE 236
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-02

OCCUPANT
2953 PULLMAN ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-04

OCCUPANT
2933 PULLMAN ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-05

OCCUPANT
2943 PULLMAN ST STE A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-05

OCCUPANT
2943 PULLMAN ST STE B
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-06

OCCUPANT
1761 E GARRY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-07

OCCUPANT
2913 PULLMAN ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-10

OCCUPANT
2923 PULLMAN ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-10

OCCUPANT
2923 PULLMAN ST STE C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-11

OCCUPANT
2922 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-15

OCCUPANT
2932 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
310
12/20/2022

430-173-16

OCCUPANT
2938 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-17

OCCUPANT
2960 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-18

OCCUPANT
2952 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-19

OCCUPANT
2942 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-20

OCCUPANT
1811 E GARRY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-21

OCCUPANT
1801 E GARRY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-173-22

OCCUPANT
1751 E GARRY AVE
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-191-12

OCCUPANT
3001 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

430-191-13

OCCUPANT
3009 DAIMLER ST
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-401

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 101
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-402

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 102
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-403

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 103
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-404

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 104
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-405

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 105
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-406

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 106
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-407

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 107
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-408

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 108
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-409

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 109
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-410

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 110
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-411

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 111
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-412

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 112
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-413

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 113
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-414

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 114
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-415

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 115
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-416

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 116
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-417

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 117
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-418

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 118
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-419

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 201
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-420

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 202
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-421

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 203
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
311
12/20/2022

930-01-422

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 204
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-423

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 205
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-424

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 206
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-425

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 207
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-426

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 208
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-427

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 209
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-428

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 210
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-429

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 211
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-430

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 212
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-431

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 213
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-432

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 214
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-433

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 215
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-434

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 216
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-435

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 217
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-436

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 218
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-437

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 219
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-438

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 220
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-439

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 221
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-440

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 222
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-441

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 223
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-442

OCCUPANT
1800 E GARRY AVE 224
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-443

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 101A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-444

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 102A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-445

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 103A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-446

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 104A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-447

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 105A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-448

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 106A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-449

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 107A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-450

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 108B
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-451

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 109B
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
312
12/20/2022

930-01-452

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 110A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-453

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 111A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-454

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 112A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-455

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 113A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-456

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 114A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-457

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 115A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-458

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 116A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-459

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 117B
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-460

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 118A
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-461

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 201D
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-462

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 202D
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-463

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 203C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-464

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 204C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-465

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 205C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-466

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 206C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-467

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 207D
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-468

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 208E
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-469

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 209C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-470

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 210C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-471

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 211C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-472

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 212C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-473

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 213E
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-474

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 214E
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-475

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 215F
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-476

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 216C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-477

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 217C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-478

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 218C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-479

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 219C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-480

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 220E
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-481

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 221D
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
313
12/20/2022

930-01-482

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 222C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-483

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 223C
SANTA ANA CA 92705

930-01-484

OCCUPANT
1820 E GARRY AVE 224D
SANTA ANA CA 92705

939-64-001

OCCUPANT
810 E DYER RD 1
SANTA ANA CA 92705

939-64-002

OCCUPANT
800 E DYER RD 2
SANTA ANA CA 92705

City Council
41 –
314
12/20/2022

cm\cntr-frm\appeal
5/00
I. OWNER/APPLICANT
Applicant
Full name of Person, Firm, or Corporation
( )
Mailing Address Area Code Phone No.

Legal Owner Name:

Legal Owner Address:

Phone No.: ( ) ( ) Fax: ( ) II. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Land Use
Existing Land Use of Property and/or Building Zoning District General Plan Designation Location
Street Address Name of Nearest Intersecting Street

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
III. REASON FOR REQUEST
In the following provided space, please clearly specify and explain the error(s) of decision or requirement upon which you are basing this appeal. (If additional space is needed, please attach additional comments to the back of this application.)

Applicant’s Signature: Date:

APPEAL APPLICATION NO.

APPEAL APPLICATION
Planning and Building Agency
Planning Division
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988 (M-20)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
(714) 647-5804
Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER), represented by Lozeau Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150, Oakland CA 94612
510
836-4200
3 office buildings containing a total of 105,558 square feet Professional (P)
Industrial/Flex (FLEX) - 3
1700, 1720, and 1740 East Garry Avenue
Garry Avenue and Pullman Street
For the reasons discussed in the attached comment, the October 10, 2022 decisions of the Planning Commission to approve Amendment Application No. 2022-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14 for the proposed Garry Avenue Business Park Project are in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA").

The City staff's determination that the Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines is incorrect. An Initial Study should have been prepared to determine the appropriate level of CEQA review required, and the Planning Commission should have declined to approve the Project until after proper CEQA review was complete. See attachment. 10/17/2022

City Council
41 –
315
12/20/2022

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

1. An appeal application form (Exhibit 1).

2. A letter stating the nature of the appeal (in lieu of the space provided on the appeal form).

3. The application fee.

4. Any other pertinent information that the application warrants.

City Council
41 –
316
12/20/2022

October 10, 2022

Via E-mail

Bao Pham, Chair
Miguel Calderon, Vice Chair
Eric M. Alderete, Commissioner
Thomas Morrisey, Commissioner
Isuri S. Ramos, Commissioner
Mark McLoughlin, Commissioner
Alan Woo, Commissioner
Planning Commission
City of Santa Ana
22 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
[email protected]
Ali Pezeshkpour, Principal Planner
Planning and Building Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-20
Santa Ana, CA 92701
[email protected]

Re: Opposition Comment on the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15183 Exemption for the Garry Avenue Business Park Project (Amendment Application No. 2022-01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14); Planning Commission Agenda Item 2

Dear Chair Pham, Vice Chair Calderon, Honorable City Planning Commissioners, and Mr.

Pezeshkpour:

I am writing on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (“SAFER”) regarding the Garry Avenue Business Park Project (Amendment Application No. 202201; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14), including all actions related or referring to the proposed construction of a 91,500 square foot industrial building, located at 1700, 1720, and 1740 East Garry Avenue in the City of Santa Ana (“Project”), which is being heard by the Planning Commission on October 10, 2022 as Agenda Item 2. The City of Santa Ana Planning Division staff have incorrectly determined that the Project is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines.

After reviewing the Community Plan Exemption Checklist (“Exemption Checklist”) prepared for the Project, as well as the 2022 City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (“GPU EIR”) upon which the Exemption Checklist relies, we conclude that the City’s consistency determination fails to provide evidence that the Project does not require further analysis and mitigation under CEQA. In particular, the consistency

City Council
41 –
317
12/20/2022

Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14) October 10, 2022

determination fails to provide evidence to support the Exemption Checklist’s findings that the Project will not involve environmental effects that:

(1) Are peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project would be located,
(2) Were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR on the zoning action, general plan or community plan with which the project is consistent, (3) Are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR prepared for the general plan, community plan or zoning action, or
(4) Are previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.

As evidenced by the expert comments submitted by environmental consulting firm Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”), additional environmental review is required because: (1) there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site, and (2) the Project would result in any new significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR. SWAPE’s comment and curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit A hereto and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

Since the Project is not exempt from CEQA, an initial study must be prepared to determine the appropriate level of CEQA review required.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The Project proposes to demolish 105,558-square-feet (“SF”) of office space and construct 81,500-SF of warehousing and distribution space, 10,000-SF of office space, and 145 parking spaces on the 5.2-acre site in the City of Santa Ana, California.

LEGAL STANDARD

The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. (Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214 [“Bakersfield Citizens”]; Pocket Protectors v.

City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 927 [“Pocket Protectors”].) The EIR is an “environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached the ecological points of no return.” (Bakersfield Citizens, 124 Cal.App.4th at 1220.) The EIR also functions as a “document of accountability,” intended to “demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has, in fact, analyzed and considered the ecological implications of its action.” (Laurel Heights Improvements Assn. v.

Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392.) The EIR process “protects not only the environment but also informed self-government.” (Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927.)

An EIR is required if “there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before

City Council
41 –
318
12/20/2022

Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14) October 10, 2022

the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.” (PRC § 21080(d); see also, Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 927.) In very limited circumstances, an agency may avoid preparing an EIR by issuing a negative declaration, a written statement briefly indicating that a project will have no significant impact thus requiring no EIR (14 CCR § 15371), only if there is not even a “fair argument” that the project will have a significant environmental effect. (PRC §§ 21100, 21064.) Since “[t]he adoption of a negative declaration . . . has a terminal effect on the environmental review process,” by allowing the agency “to dispense with the duty [to prepare an EIR],” negative declarations are allowed only in cases where “the proposed project will not affect the environment at all.” (Citizens of Lake Murray v.

San Diego (1989) 129 Cal.App.3d 436, 440.)

To achieve its objectives of environmental protection, CEQA has a three-tiered structure. (14 CCR § 15002(k); Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan v. City of Los Angeles (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 1168, 1185-86 [“Hollywoodland”].) First, if a project falls into an exempt category, or it can be seen with certainty that the activity in question will not have a significant effect on the environment, no further agency evaluation is required. Id. Second, if there is a possibility the project will have a significant effect on the environment, the agency must perform an initial threshold study. (Id.; 14 CCR § 15063(a).) If the study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment the agency may issue a negative declaration. (Id.; 14 CCR §§ 15063(b)(2), 15070.) Finally, if the project will have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report (“EIR”) is required. (Id.) Here, since the City exempted the Project from CEQA entirely, the first step of the CEQA process applies.

CEQA identifies certain classes of projects which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. These are called categorical exemptions. (14 CCR §§ 15300, 15354.) “Exemptions to CEQA are narrowly construed and ‘[e]xemption categories are not to be expanded beyond the reasonable scope of their statutory language.’ (Citations).” (Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 125.) The determination as to the appropriate scope of a categorical exemption is a question of law subject to independent, or de novo, review. (San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist., (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 1356, 1375 (“[Q]uestions of interpretation or application of the requirements of CEQA are matters of law. (Citations.) Thus, for example, interpreting the scope of a CEQA exemption presents ‘a question of law, subject to de novo review by this court.’ (Citations).”).)

In addition, there are several exceptions to CEQA’s categorical exemptions. (See, 14 CCR § 15300.2.) At least one exception is relevant here:

Significant Effects. A project may never be exempted from CEQA if there is a “fair argument” that the project may have significant environmental impacts due to “unusual circumstances.” 14 CCR § 15300.2(c). The Supreme Court has held that since the agency may only exempt activities that do not have a significant effect on the environment, a fair argument that a project will have significant

City Council
41 –
319
12/20/2022

Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14) October 10, 2022

effects precludes an exemption. (Wildlife Alive v. Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, 204.)

Here, the City has issued a notice of exemption alleging that the proposed Project is exempt from CEQA review under Section 15183. However, as discussed below, this exemption is improper, and instead, a full CEQA analysis, such as an EIR, must be prepared for this Project.

DISCUSSION

I. THE PROJECT WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS PECULIAR TO THE

PROJECT THAT WERE NOT ANALYZED AS SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS IN

THE GENERAL PLAN EIR AND THESE IMPACTS REQUIRE FURTHER

ANALYSIS UNDER CEQA

Section 15183 of the California Environmental Quality Act allows a project to avoid environmental review if it is “consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified . . . except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” (14 CCR § 15183 (emphasis added).) The intention of this section is to “streamline[]” CEQA review for projects and avoid the preparation of repetitive documents. Even when a project is “consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified,”, environmental review is still required for various types of impacts, including those “peculiar to the project or parcel on which the project would be located,” those which “were not analyzed as significant effects in a prior EIR,” “are potentially significant off-site impacts and cumulative impacts which were not discussed in the prior EIR,” or “[a]re previously identified significant effects which, as a result of substantial new information which was not known at the time the EIR was certified, are determined to have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the prior EIR.” (14 CCR sec. 15183.)

Section 1518(f) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a Project’s environmental effects are not peculiar to a project if “uniformly applied development policies or standards have been previously adopted” which serve to mitigate environmental impacts, “unless substantial new information shows that the policies or standards will not substantially mitigate the environmental effect.” (Emphasis added). Therefore, the standard set forth by CEQA for this analysis is substantial evidence.

Here, there is substantial evidence demonstrating that the Project will have project- specific significant impacts that were not addressed in the General Plan EIR, and therefore must be addressed through CEQA review now.

II. THE PROJECT WILL HAVE PROJECT-SPECIFIC SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS

WHICH WERE NOT ADDRESSED IN THE PREVIOUS GENERAL PLAN
UPDATE EIR.

City Council
41 –
320
12/20/2022

Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14) October 10, 2022

First of all, the Project’s potential air quality impacts were not addressed in the previous General Plan EIR, because the air quality impacts of the Project as proposed could not have been foreseen at the time the General Plan was prepared. Emissions for the proposed Project must be modeled using a program such as CalEEMod, and project-specific input parameters must be measured against applicable thresholds. Further, a screening-level HRA must be prepared to determine the risk posed to nearby residential receptors, as well as propose mitigation as necessary. If the Project’s criteria air pollutant and/or toxic air contaminant emissions exceed the relevant South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (“SCAQMD”) thresholds, the Project’s greenhouse gas emissions must also be modeled using a program such as CalEEMod and mitigation must be implemented if necessary. As discussed below, these considerations all represent potential project-specific significant effects that were not addressed in the previous General Plan EIR, and therefore, the City must review these impacts under CEQA.

A. The Project Could Have Significant Air Quality Impacts, Requiring Additional CEQA Analysis Under Section 15183.

In support of the Exemption, the City claims that the Project is not required to submit an HRA, as Mitigation Measure AQ-3 (“MM-AQ-3”) included in the GPU EIR is not applicable to the Project. (See, Exhibit A, pp. 1-2.) However, as SWAPE notes, “regardless of the [Exemption Checklist] claims, the State of California Department of Justice recommends that all warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district guidelines.”

OEHHA released its most recent guidance document in 2015 describing which types of projects warrant preparation of an HRA. (See, e.g., “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_spots/hotspots2015.html.) OEHHA recommends that projects lasting at least 2 months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors, a time period which this Project easily exceeds. (Exhibit A, p. 2.) Because “the Project’s anticipated construction duration exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA, construction of the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance and should be evaluated for the entire 12-month construction period.” (Id.) The OEHHA document also recommends that if a project is expected to last over 6 months, the exposure should be evaluated throughout the project using a 30-year exposure duration to estimate individual cancer risks. (Id.) Based on its extensive experience, SWAPE reasonably assumes that the Project will last at least 30 years, and therefore recommends that health risk impacts from project-generated Diesel Particulate Matter (“DPM”) emissions be evaluated. (Id.)

An initial study and mitigated negative declaration or environmental impact report is needed to adequately address the air quality impacts of the proposed Project, and to mitigate those impacts accordingly.

B. The Project Will Have a Significant Health Impact as a Result of Diesel Particulate Emissions into the Air.

City Council
41 –
321
12/20/2022

Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14) October 10, 2022

SWAPE analyzed the Project’s emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter (DPM) into the air, and the resulting impact on human health. To do so, SWAPE prepared a screening-level Health Risk Assessment (“HRA”) to evaluate potential impacts from the construction and operation of the Project. (Exhibit A, pp. 3-7.) SWAPE prepared a screening-level HRA to evaluate potential health risk impacts posed to residential sensitive receptors as a result of the Project’s construction-related and operational TAC emissions. SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening-level air quality dispersion model. SWAPE applied a sensitive receptor distance of 200 meters and analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on OEHHA and SCAQMD guidance utilizing age sensitivity factors.

SWAPE found that the excess cancer risks at a sensitive receptor located approximately 200 meters away over the course of Project construction and operation, while utilizing the recommended age sensitivity factors, are approximately 71.6 in one million for infants, 103 in one million for children, and 11.5 in one million for adults. (Id., p. 6.) Moreover, the excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (i.e. 30 years) for Project operation and construction is approximately 188 in one million. (Id.) The cancer risks to infants, children, adults, and lifetime residents appreciably exceed SCAQMD’s threshold of 10 in one million, thus indicating a significant air quality impact.

Because the Project will have numerous significant air quality impacts peculiar to this project, and not analyzed in the GP EIR, additional CEQA review is required.

C. The Project Will Have Significant Greenhouse Gas Impacts Requiring Additional CEQA Analysis Under 15183 Exemption.

SWAPE analyzed Project’s potential greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and found that the Project and GPU EIR failed to adequately analyze the Project’s greenhouse gas impacts, which SWAPE found to be potentially significant. (See, Exhibit A, pp. 8-10.)

First, the Exemption Checklist’s greenhouse gas impact analysis and subsequent less- than-significant impact conclusion are based on an outdated quantitative analysis GHG threshold. (See, id., pp. 8-9.) According to SWAPE, the Exemption Checklist incorrectly “estimates that the Project would generate net annual [GHG] emissions of 1,668 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”), which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year.” (Id., p. 8.) SWAPE explains that this is incorrect because “the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2e/year threshold, the SCAQMD’s 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as “AB 32”, was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.” (Id.) In addition, the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP) guidance states:

City Council
41 –
322
12/20/2022

Comment on Garry Avenue Business Park Project
Planning Commission Agenda Item 2 (Amendment Application No. 2022 -01; Conditional Use Permit No. 2022-14) October 10, 2022

[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone.

(Id., pp. 8-9 [citations omitted].) Because it is currently October 2022, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. (Id., p. 9.) As a result, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the [Exemption Checklist’s] less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. (Exhibit A, p. 9.) Instead, SWAPE recommends “that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per service population per year (“MT CO2e/SP/year”), which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.” (Id.)

To more accurately determine the Project’s GHG emissions, SWAPE prepared an updated air model using the project-specific information provided by the Exemption Checklist. (See, id., pp. 9-10.) SWAPE’s updated analysis demonstrates that the Project would emit approximately 14.6 MT CO2e/SP/year. (Id.) Therefore, the Project’s service population efficiency value exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant GHG impact not previously identified or addressed by the Exemption Checklist or GPU EIR. Thus, SWAPE’s model demonstrates that the Project would result in a significant GHG impact, which precludes reliance on the CEQA Section 15183 exemption.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, SAFER requests that the Planning Commission deny the applications for the Project and, instead, direct city staff to prepare the necessary environmental documents under CEQA. The City should prepare an initial study followed by an EIR or negative declaration in accordance with CEQA prior to consideration of approvals for the Project.

Sincerely,

Victoria Yundt
LOZEAU | DRURY LLP

City Council
41 –
323
12/20/2022

EXHIBIT A

City Council
41 –
324
12/20/2022

2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
September 23, 2022
Victoria Yundt
Lozeau | Drury LLP
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150
Oakland, CA 94618
Subject: Comments on the 1700 Garry Avenue Project
Dear Ms. Yundt,
We have reviewed the August 2022 Planning Commission Staff Report (“Staff Report”) for the 1700 E Garry Avenue Project (“Project”) located in the City of Santa Ana (“City”). The Project proposes to demolish 105,558-square-feet (“SF”) of office space and construct 81,500-SF of warehousing and distribution space, 10,000-SF of office space, and 145 parking spaces on the 5.2-acre site.

Our review concludes that the Staff Report fails to adequately evaluate the Project’s health risk and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential health risk and greenhouse gas impacts that the Project may have on the environment.

Air Quality
Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions Inadequately Evaluated Regarding the preparation of a health risk analysis (“HRA”), the General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (“GPU EIR”) incorporates Mitigation Measure (“MM”) AQ-3. The Environmental Analysis (“EA”), provided as Exhibit 10 to the Staff Report, elaborates on MM AQ-3, stating:
“AQ-3 Prior to discretionary approval by the City of Santa Ana, project applicants for new industrial or warehousing development projects that 1) have the potential to generate 100 or more diesel truck trips per day or have 40 or more trucks with operating diesel- powered transport refrigeration units, and 2) are within 1,000 feet of a sensitive land use (e.g.,

City Council
41 –
325
12/20/2022

2 residential, schools, hospitals, or nursing homes), as measured from the property line of the project to the property line of the nearest sensitive use, shall submit a health risk assessment (HRA) to the City of Santa Ana for review and approval… Proposed Project Applicability: Mitigation Measure AQ-3 is not applicable to the proposed Project because it would only generate 44 truck trips per day, as detailed in Section 5.17, Transportation” (p. 2-81).

As demonstrated above, the EA claims the Project is not required to submit an HRA, as MM-AQ-3 is not applicable to the proposed Project. However, regardless of the EA’s claims, the State of California Department of Justice recommends that all warehouse projects prepare a quantitative HRA pursuant to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (“OEHHA”), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California, as well as local air district guidelines.1 OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015. This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. Specifically, OEHHA recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least 2 months assess cancer risks.
2 Furthermore, according to OEHHA:
“Exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months should be evaluated for the duration of the project. In all cases, for assessing risk to residential receptors, the exposure should be assumed to start in the third trimester to allow for the use of the ASFs (OEHHA, 2009).”3 Thus, as the Project’s anticipated construction duration exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA, construction of the Project meets the threshold warranting a quantified HRA under OEHHA guidance and should be evaluated for the entire 12-month construction period (p. 2-53). Furthermore, OEHHA recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years should be used to estimate the individual cancer risk at the maximally exposed individual resident (“MEIR”). 4 While the Project documents fail to provide the expected lifetime of the proposed Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project would operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, operation of the Project also exceeds the 2-month and 6-month requirements set forth by OEHHA and should be evaluated for the entire 30-year residential exposure duration, as indicated by OEHHA guidance. These recommendations reflect the most recent state health risk policies, and as such, an EIR should be prepared to include an analysis of health risk impacts posed to nearby sensitive receptors from Project- generated DPM emissions.

1 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6. 2 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 3 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 4 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 2-4.

City Council
41 –
326
12/20/2022

3 Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Potentially Significant Health Risk Impact In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.5 As discussed above, the model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (“CAPCOA”) guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments (“HRSAs”).6, 7 A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project.

We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project’s construction and operational health risk impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM
10 exhaust estimates from the EA’s CalEEMod output
files, provided within the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assessment (“GHG Assessment”) as Appendix F to the EA. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.8 The EA’s CalEEMod model indicates that construction activities will generate approximately 125 pounds of DPM over the 363-day construction period.9 The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation:

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠� = 124.6 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝐸𝐸
363 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑 𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙 𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅 𝑑𝑑
24 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔 𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜 𝑔𝑔
3,600 𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔
Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00180 grams per second (“g/s”).

Subtracting the 363-day construction period from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction, the sensitive receptor would be exposed to the Project’s operational DPM for an additional 29.01 years. The EA’s operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 340 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation:

𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑠𝑠 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 �𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠� = 340.0 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 𝐸𝐸
365 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅𝑑𝑑 𝐸𝐸 × 453.6 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑅𝑅 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
𝑙𝑙 𝑙𝑙 𝐸𝐸 × 1 𝑠𝑠 𝑅𝑅 𝑑𝑑
24 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜𝑔𝑔 𝐸𝐸 × 1 ℎ𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑜 𝑔𝑔
3,600 𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒈𝒈/𝒔𝒔

5 “AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model,” U.S. EPA, April 2011, available at:
http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411_AERSCREEN_Release_Memo.pdf 6 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 7 “Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects.” CAPCOA, July 2009, available at:
http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA_HRA_LU_Guidelines_8-6-09.pdf. 8 “Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-18. 9 See Attachment A for health risk calculations.

City Council
41 –
327
12/20/2022

4 Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.00489 g/s. Construction and operation were simulated as a 5.13-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN, with approximate dimensions of 204- by 102-meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of stacks of operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release.

An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The population of Santa Ana was obtained from U.S. 2020 Census data. 10 The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project Site. The U.S. EPA suggests that the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10% in screening procedures. 11 According to the Air Quality Assessment (“AQA”), provided as Appendix A to the EA, the nearest sensitive receptor is located 700 feet, or 213 meters, from the Project site (p. 9). Thus, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 1.049 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 200 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.1049 µg/m3 for Project construction at the MEIR. For Project operation, the single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN is 2.849 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 200 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.2849 µg/m3 for Project operation at the MEIR.

We calculated the excess cancer risk to the MEIR using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA, as recommended by SCAQMD.12 Specifically, guidance from OEHHA and the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) recommends the use of a standard point estimate approach, including high- point estimate (i.e. 95th percentile) breathing rates and age sensitivity factors (“ASF”) in order to account for the increased sensitivity to carcinogens during early-in-life exposure and accurately assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. The residential exposure parameters, such as the daily breathing rates (“BR/BW”), exposure duration (“ED”), age sensitivity factors (“ASF”), fraction of time at home (“FAH”), and exposure frequency (“EF”) utilized for the various age groups in our screening-level HRA are as follows:

10 “Santa Anna.” U.S. Census Bureau, 2020, available at: https://datacommons.org/place/geoId/0669000. 11 “Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised.” U.S. EPA, October 1992, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019_OCR.pdf. 12 “AB 2588 and Rule 1402 Supplemental Guidelines.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk-assessment/ab-2588-supplemental- guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 2.

City Council
41 –
328
12/20/2022

5 Exposure Assumptions for Residential Individual Cancer Risk Age Group
Breathing
Rate
(L/kg-day)13
Age
Sensitivity
Factor14
Exposure
Duration
(years)
Fraction of
Time at
Home15
Exposure
Frequency
(days/year)16
Exposure
Time
(hours/day)
3rd Trimester 361 10 0.25 1 350 24
Infant (0 - 2) 1090 10 2 1 350 24
Child (2 - 16) 572 3 14 1 350 24
Adult (16 - 30) 261 1 14 0.73 350 24
For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify do se for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor (“CPF”) in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day-1) to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to assess exposures, we utilized the following dose algorithm:

𝐷𝐷𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴,𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 𝑎𝑎 𝑝𝑝 𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑔𝑝𝑝 = 𝐶𝐶𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑝𝑝 × 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 × � 𝐵𝐵 𝑅𝑅 𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵� × 𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸
where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (μg/m3)
EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days)
BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg/day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1)
CF = conversion factor (1x10-6, μg to mg, L to m3)
To calculate the overall cancer risk, we used the following equation for each appropriate age group:

𝐶𝐶
𝑅𝑅𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑅𝑅𝑔𝑔 𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 = 𝐷𝐷𝑠𝑠𝐸𝐸 𝑅𝑅 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 × 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝐶 𝐸𝐸 × 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 𝐸𝐸 × 𝐸𝐸𝐴𝐴 𝐹𝐹 × 𝐸𝐸 𝐷𝐷 𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴

13 “Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics ‘Hot Spots’ Information and Assessment Act.” SCAQMD, October 2020, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab-2588-supplemental-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=19, p. 19; see also “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at:
https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 14 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-5 Table 8.3. 15 “Risk Assessment Procedures.” SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/rule-book/Proposed-Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures_2017_080717.pdf, p. 7. 16 “Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.” OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 5-24.

City Council
41 –
329
12/20/2022

6 where:

DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg/day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg/day)-1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group
FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years)
AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (always 70 years) Consistent with the 363-day construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years), and the first 0.74 years of the infantile stage of life (0 – 2 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, which makes up the latter 1.26 years of the infantile stage of life, as well as the entire child (2 – 16) and adult (16 – 30 years) stages of life. The results of our calculations are shown in the table below.

The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Age Group Emissions Source Duration (years) Concentration (ug/m3) Cancer Risk
3rd Trimester Construction 0.25 0.1049 1.43E-06
Construction 0.74 0.1049 1.28E-05
Operation 1.26 0.2849 5.87E-05
Infant (0 - 2) Total 2 7.16E-05
Child (2 - 16) Operation 14 0.2849 1.03E-04
Adult (16 - 30) Operation 14 0.2849 1.15E-05
Lifetime 30 1.88E-04
As demonstrated in the table above, the excess cancer risks for the 3rd trimester of pregnancy, infants, children, and adults at the MEIR located approximately 200 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, are approximately 1.43, 71.6, 103, and 11.5 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) is approximately 188 in one million.

The infant, child, adult, and lifetime cancer risks exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the EA.

Our analysis represents a screening-level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection. The purpose of the screening-level HRA is to demonstrate the potential link between Project-generated emissions and adverse health risk impacts. According to the U.S. EPA:

City Council
41 –
330
12/20/2022

7 “EPA’s Exposure Assessment Guidelines recommend completing exposure assessments iteratively using a tiered approach to ‘strike a balance between the costs of adding detail and refinement to an assessment and the benefits associated with that additional refinement’ (U.S.

EPA, 1992).

In other words, an assessment using basic tools (e.g., simple exposure calculations, default values, rules of thumb, conservative assumptions) can be conducted as the first phase (or tier) of the overall assessment (i.e., a screening-level assessment).

The exposure assessor or risk manager can then determine whether the results of the screening- level assessment warrant further evaluation through refinements of the input data and exposure assumptions or by using more advanced models.” As demonstrated above, screening-level analyses warrant further evaluation in a refined modeling approach. Thus, as our screening-level HRA demonstrates that construction and operation of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, an EIR should be prepared to include a refined health risk analysis which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation.

Greenhouse Gas
Failure to Adequately Evaluate Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The Project claims an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Guidelines Section 15183. Specifically, the Staff Report states:
“Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to 15183 of the CEQA Guidelines. This type of exemption analysis evaluates whether the potential environmental impacts of the proposed demolition of three office buildings, which total 105,558 square feet, and construction of a new 91,500 square foot light industrial warehousing building that would accommodate two tenants are addressed in the City of Santa Ana General Plan Update Final Recirculated Program Environmental Impact Report (GPU EIR).

As set forth in California Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21083.3 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, projects that are “consistent with the development density established by the existing zoning, community plan or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site” (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(a) and PRC Section 21083.3(b)). The State CEQA Guidelines further state that “[i]f an impact is not peculiar to the parcel or to the project, has been addressed as a significant effect in the prior EIR, or can be substantially mitigated by the imposition of uniformly applied development policies or standards […] then an additional EIR need not be prepared for the project solely on the basis of that impact” (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(c))” (p. 2-6 – 2-7).

City Council
41 –
331
12/20/2022

8 As demonstrated above, a Project is ineligible for an exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15183 if “there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” The City determined that the Project would not result in any new significant effects not discussed in the GPU EIR.

Furthermore, the EA concludes the Project would have a less-than-significant greenhouse gas (“GHG”) impact (p. 2-99 – 2-100). However, these claims are incorrect and subsequent environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA Guidelines 15183, as the Project’s GHG analysis is insufficient for the following two reasons:
(1) The EA’s GHG analysis relies upon an outdated quantitative GHG threshold; and (2) The EA’s GHG analysis fails to identify a potentially significant GHG impact. 1) Incorrect Reliance on an Outdated Quantitative GHG Threshold The EA estimates that the Project would generate net annual greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions of 1,668 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per year (“MT CO2e/year”), which would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year (see excerpt below) (p. 2-99, Table GHG-2).

However, the guidance that provided the 3,000 MT CO2e/year threshold, the SCAQMD’s 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans report, was developed when the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, commonly known as “AB 32”, was the governing statute for GHG reductions in California. AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
17 Furthermore, AEP guidance states:

17 “Health & Safety Code 38550.” California State Legislature, January 2007, available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=HSC&sectionNum=38550.

City Council
41 –
332
12/20/2022

9 “[F]or evaluating projects with a post 2020 horizon, the threshold will need to be revised based on a new gap analysis that would examine 17 development and reduction potentials out to the next GHG reduction milestone.”18
As it is currently September 2022, thresholds for 2020 are not applicable to the proposed Project and should be revised to reflect the current GHG reduction target. As such, the SCAQMD bright-line threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year is outdated and inapplicable to the proposed Project, and the EA’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Instead, we recommend that the Project apply the SCAQMD 2035 service population efficiency target of 3.0 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents per service population per year (“MT CO2e/SP/year”), which was calculated by applying a 40% reduction to the 2020 targets.19
2) Failure to Identify a Potentially Significant GHG Impact In an effort to quantitatively evaluate the Project’s GHG emissions, we compared the Project’s GHG emissions, as estimated by the EA, to the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year. When applying this threshold, the Project’s air model indicates a potentially significant GHG impact.

As previously stated, the EA estimates that the Project would generate net annual GHG emissions of 1,668 MT CO2e/year (p. 2-99, Table GHG-2). According to CAPCOA’s CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population (“SP”) is defined as “the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project.”20 The EA indicates that the Project would generate approximately 114 jobs (p. 2-124). As the proposed Project does not include any residential land uses, we estimate a SP of 114 people. When dividing the Project’s net annual GHG emissions, as estimated by the EA, by a SP of 114 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 14.6 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).21 EA Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Annual Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 1,668
Service Population 114
Service Population Efficiency (MT CO2e/SP/year) 14.6
SCAQMD 2035 Target 3.0
Exceeds? Yes

18 “Beyond Newhall and 2020: A Field Guide to New CEQA Greenhouse Gas Thresholds and Climate Action Plan Targets for California.” Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP), October 2016, available at:
https://califaep.org/docs/AEP-2016_Final_White_Paper.pdf, p. 39. 19 “Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #15.” SCAQMD, September 2010, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa- significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-minutes.pdf, p. 2. 20 “CEQA & Climate Change.” California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), January 2008, available at: http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf, p. 71-72. 21 Calculated: (1,668 MT CO2e/year) / (114 service population) = (14.6 MT CO2e/SP/year).

City Council
41 –
333
12/20/2022

10 As demonstrated above, the Project’s service population efficiency value, as estimated by the EA’s provided net annual GHG emission estimates and SP, exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, indicating a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the EA. As a result, the EA’s less-than-significant GHG impact conclusion should not be relied upon. Thus, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15183, an EIR should be prepared, including an updated GHG analysis and incorporating additional mitigation measures to reduce the Project’s GHG emissions to less-than- significant levels.

Mitigation
Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Project would result in potentially significant health risk and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. In an effort to reduce the Project’s emissions, we identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Project. Feasible mitigation measures can be found in the Department of Justice Warehouse Project Best Practices document.22 Therefore, to reduce the Project’s emissions, consideration of the following measures should be made:
• Requiring off-road construction equipment to be zero-emission, where available, and all diesel- fueled off-road construction equipment, to be equipped with CARB Tier IV-compliant engines or better, and including this requirement in applicable bid documents, purchase orders, and contracts, with successful contractors demonstrating the ability to supply the compliant construction equipment for use prior to any ground-disturbing and construction activities. • Prohibiting off-road diesel-powered equipment from being in the “on” position for more than 10 hours per day.
• Requiring on-road heavy-duty haul trucks to be model year 2010 or newer if diesel-fueled. • Providing electrical hook ups to the power grid, rather than use of diesel-fueled generators, for electric construction tools, such as saws, drills and compressors, and using electric tools whenever feasible.
• Limiting the amount of daily grading disturbance area. • Prohibiting grading on days with an Air Quality Index forecast of greater than 100 for particulates or ozone for the project area.
• Forbidding idling of heavy equipment for more than two minutes. • Keeping onsite and furnishing to the lead agency or other regulators upon request, all equipment maintenance records and data sheets, including design specifications and emission control tier classifications.
• Conducting an on-site inspection to verify compliance with construction mitigation and to identify other opportunities to further reduce construction impacts. • Using paints, architectural coatings, and industrial maintenance coatings that have volatile organic compound levels of less than 10 g/L.

22 “Warehouse Projects: Best Practices and Mitigation Measures to Comply with the California Environmental Quality Act.” State of California Department of Justice, available at:
https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/environment/warehouse-best-practices.pdf, p. 6 – 9.

City Council
41 –
334
12/20/2022

11 • Providing information on transit and ridesharing programs and services to construction employees.
• Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations for construction employees.
• Requiring that all facility-owned and operated fleet equipment with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 14,000 pounds accessing the site meet or exceed 2010 model-year emissions equivalent engine standards as currently defined in California Code of Regulations Title 13, Division 3, Chapter 1, Article 4.5, Section 2025. Facility operators shall maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance with this requirement and shall make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring all heavy-duty vehicles entering or operated on the project site to be zero-emission beginning in 2030.
• Requiring on-site equipment, such as forklifts and yard trucks, to be electric with the necessary electrical charging stations provided.
• Requiring tenants to use zero-emission light- and medium-duty vehicles as part of business operations.
• Forbidding trucks from idling for more than two minutes and requiring operators to turn off engines when not in use.
• Posting both interior- and exterior-facing signs, including signs directed at all dock and delivery areas, identifying idling restrictions and contact information to report violations to CARB, the air district, and the building manager.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, air filtration systems at sensitive receptors within a certain radius of facility for the life of the project.
• Installing and maintaining, at the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals, an air monitoring station proximate to sensitive receptors and the facility for the life of the project, and making the resulting data publicly available in real time. While air monitoring does not mitigate the air quality or greenhouse gas impacts of a facility, it nonetheless benefits the affected community by providing information that can be used to improve air quality or avoid exposure to unhealthy air.
• Constructing electric truck charging stations proportional to the number of dock doors at the project.
• Constructing electric plugs for electric transport refrigeration units at every dock door, if the warehouse use could include refrigeration.
• Constructing electric light-duty vehicle charging stations proportional to the number of parking spaces at the project.
• Installing solar photovoltaic systems on the project site of a specified electrical generation capacity, such as equal to the building’s projected energy needs. • Requiring all stand-by emergency generators to be powered by a non-diesel fuel. • Requiring facility operators to train managers and employees on efficient scheduling and load management to eliminate unnecessary queuing and idling of trucks.

City Council
41 –
335
12/20/2022

12 • Requiring operators to establish and promote a rideshare program that discourages single- occupancy vehicle trips and provides financial incentives for alternate modes of transportation, including carpooling, public transit, and biking.
• Meeting CalGreen Tier 2 green building standards, including all provisions related to designated parking for clean air vehicles, electric vehicle charging, and bicycle parking. • Achieving certification of compliance with LEED green building standards. • Providing meal options onsite or shuttles between the facility and nearby meal destinations. • Posting signs at every truck exit driveway providing directional information to the truck route. • Improving and maintaining vegetation and tree canopy for residents in and around the project area.
• Requiring that every tenant train its staff in charge of keeping vehicle records in diesel technologies and compliance with CARB regulations, by attending CARB-approved courses. Also require facility operators to maintain records on-site demonstrating compliance and make records available for inspection by the local jurisdiction, air district, and state upon request. • Requiring tenants to enroll in the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s SmartWay program, and requiring tenants to use carriers that are SmartWay carriers. • Providing tenants with information on incentive programs, such as the Carl Moyer Program and Voucher Incentive Program, to upgrade their fleets.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Project, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during Project construction and operation. An EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated health risk and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to Project approval, to ensure that the Project’s significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,

City Council
41 –
336
12/20/2022

13 M
att Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

P
aul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

A
ttachment A: Health Risk Calculations
Attachment B: AERSCREEN Output Files
Attachment C: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment D: Paul Rosenfeld CV

City Council
41 –
337
12/20/2022

Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0792 Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.17 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.433972603 Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.931506849 Construction Duration (days) 184 Total DPM (lbs) 340
Total DPM (lbs) 79.8509589 Emission Rate (g/s) 0.004890411 Total DPM (g) 36220.39496 Release Height (meters) 3
Start Date 7/1/2021 Total Acreage 5.13
End Date 1/1/2022 Max Horizontal (meters) 203.77
Construction Days 184 Min Horizontal (meters) 101.88
Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5
Annual Emissions (tons/year) 0.0456 Setting Urban
Daily Emissions (lbs/day) 0.249863014 Population 309,441 Construction Duration (days) 179
Total DPM (lbs) 44.72547945
Total DPM (g) 20287.47748
Start Date 1/1/2022
End Date 6/29/2022
Construction Days 179
Total DPM (lbs) 124.5764384
Total DPM (g) 56507.87244
Emission Rate (g/s) 0.001801725
Release Height (meters) 3
Total Acreage 5.13
Max Horizontal (meters) 203.77
Min Horizontal (meters) 101.88
Initial Vertical Dimension (meters) 1.5
Setting Urban
Population 309,441
Start Date 7/1/2021
End Date 6/29/2022
Total Construction Days 363
Total Years of Construction 0.99
Total Years of Operation 29.01
2022
Operation
2021
Total
Emission Rate
Construction
Appendix A

City Council
41 –
338
12/20/2022

Start date and time  09/20/22 13:21:17
AERSCREEN 21112
Gary Avenue Business Park, Construction
Gary Avenue Business Park, Construction
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  DATA ENTRY VALIDATION  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ METRIC              ENGLISH
** AREADATA **  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Emission Rate:    0.180E‐02 g/s 0.143E ‐01 lb/hr
Area Height: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet
Area Source Length:  203.77 meters 668.54  feet
Area Source Width:   101.88 meters 334.25  feet
Vertical Dimension:    1.50 meters 4.92 feet
Model Mode: URBAN
Population: 309441
Dist to Ambient Air: 1.0 meters 3. feet
** BUILDING DATA **
Appendix B

City Council
41 –
339
12/20/2022

No Building Downwash Parameters

** TERRAIN DATA **

No Terrain Elevations

Source Base Elevation:   0.0 meters        0.0  feet

Probe distance:   5000. meters       16404. feet

No flagpole receptors

No discrete receptors used

** FUMIGATION DATA **

No fumigation
requested

** METEOROLOGY DATA **

Min/Max Temperature:  250.0 / 310.0 K   ‐9.7 /  98.3 Deg F

Minimum Wind Speed:     0.5 m/s

City Council
41 –
340
12/20/2022

Anemometer Height:   10.000 meters
Dominant Surface Profile: Urban
Dominant Climate Type:    Average Moisture
Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted
DEBUG OPTION ON
AERSCREEN output file:
2022.09.20_AERSCREEN_GaryAveBusinessPark_Construction.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin
No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run
**************************************************
SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET
Obtaining surface characteristics...

City Council
41 –
341
12/20/2022

Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture

Season             Albedo     Bo       zo

Winter              0.35     1.50     1.000

Spring              0.14     1.00     1.000

Summer              0.16     2.00     1.000

Autumn              0.18     2.00     1.000

Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl

Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl

Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc &
aerscreen_03_01.pfl

Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl

Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe

FLOWSECTOR   started 09/20/22 13:25:18

********************************************

Running AERMOD

Processing Winter

Processing surface roughness sector  1

City Council
41 –
342
12/20/2022

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector   5

********   WARNING MESSAGES
********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

City Council
41 –
343
12/20/2022

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  20

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   6

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  25

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

City Council
41 –
344
12/20/2022

Processing wind flow sector   7

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  30

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

********************************************

Running AERMOD

Processing Spring

Processing surface roughness sector  1

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes
Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector   5

City Council
41 –
345
12/20/2022

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage
2 Spring sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector  20

City Council
41 –
346
12/20/2022

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   6

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector  25

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   7

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2
Spring sector  30

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

********************************************

Running AERMOD

Processing Summer

Processing surface roughness sector  1

City Council
41 –
347
12/20/2022

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector   5

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

City Council
41 –
348
12/20/2022

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  20

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***
NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   6

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  25

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   7

City Council
41 –
349
12/20/2022

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  30

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

********************************************

Running AERMOD

Processing Autumn

Processing surface roughness sector  1

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2
Autumn sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector   5

City Council
41 –
350
12/20/2022

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2
Autumn sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  20

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

City Council
41 –
351
12/20/2022

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   6

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  25

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   7

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  30

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

FLOWSECTOR   ended 09/20/22 13:25:28

REFINE       started 09/20/22 13:25:28

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

City Council
41 –
352
12/20/2022

***  NONE  ***

REFINE       ended 09/20/22 13:25:29

**********************************************

AERSCREEN Finished Successfully

With no errors or warnings

Check log file for details

***********************************************

Ending date and time  09/20/22 13:25:30

City Council
41 –
353
12/20/2022

Concentration     Distance Elevation  Diag  Season/Month   Zo sector       Date H0     U*     W*  DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH  M‐O LEN    Z0  BOWEN ALBEDO  REF WS     HT REF TA     HT

0.21811E+01         1.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23810E+01        25.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.25483E+01        50.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26879E+01        75.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.28382E+01       100.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0
*  0.28493E+01       103.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21693E+01       125.00      0.00  20.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15454E+01       150.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12544E+01       175.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10495E+01       200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.89655E+00       225.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.77806E+00       250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.68454E+00       275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.60894E+00       300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.54643E+00       325.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.49474E+00       350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
354
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.45072E+00       375.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.41319E+00       400.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38070E+00       425.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.35233E+00       450.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.32761E+00       475.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.30590E+00       500.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.28629E+00       525.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26873E+00       550.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.25302E+00       575.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23890E+00       600.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.22613E+00       625.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21443E+00       650.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.20373E+00       675.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19395E+00       700.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18497E+00       725.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17666E+00       750.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16897E+00       775.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
355
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16186E+00       800.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15526E+00       825.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14912E+00       850.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14333E+00       875.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13793E+00       900.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13288E+00       925.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12815E+00       950.01      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12370E+00       975.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11952E+00      1000.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11558E+00      1025.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11186E+00      1050.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10835E+00      1075.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10503E+00      1100.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10189E+00      1125.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.98893E‐01      1150.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.96044E‐01      1175.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
356
12/20/2022

0.93336E‐01      1200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.90760E‐01      1225.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.88304E‐01      1250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.85947E‐01      1275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.83698E‐01      1300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.81549E‐01      1325.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.79495E‐01      1350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.77530E‐01      1375.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.75650E‐01      1400.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.73850E‐01      1425.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.72121E‐01      1450.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.70460E‐01      1475.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.68866E‐01      1500.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.67333E‐01      1525.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.65860E‐01      1550.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.64441E‐01      1575.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.63076E‐01      1600.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
357
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.61759E‐01      1625.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.60491E‐01      1650.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.59267E‐01      1675.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.58086E‐01      1700.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.56945E‐01      1725.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.55843E‐01      1750.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.54775E‐01      1775.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.53743E‐01      1800.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.52746E‐01      1825.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.51781E‐01      1850.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.50847E‐01      1875.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.50272E‐01      1900.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.49380E‐01      1925.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.48514E‐01      1950.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.47675E‐01      1975.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.46860E‐01      2000.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.46069E‐01      2025.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
358
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.45301E‐01      2050.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.44555E‐01      2075.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.43830E‐01      2100.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.43125E‐01      2125.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.42440E‐01      2150.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.41773E‐01      2175.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.41124E‐01      2200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.40493E‐01      2225.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.39878E‐01      2250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.39279E‐01      2275.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38695E‐01      2300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38126E‐01      2325.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.37572E‐01      2350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.37031E‐01      2375.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.36504E‐01      2400.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.35990E‐01      2425.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
359
12/20/2022

0.35488E‐01      2450.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.34998E‐01      2475.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.34519E‐01      2500.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.34052E‐01      2525.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.33596E‐01      2550.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.33150E‐01      2575.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.32714E‐01      2600.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.32289E‐01      2625.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.31872E‐01      2650.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.31465E‐01      2675.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.31067E‐01      2700.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.30677E‐01      2725.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.30296E‐01      2750.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.29923E‐01      2775.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.29558E‐01      2800.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.29200E‐01      2825.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.28850E‐01      2850.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
360
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.28508E‐01      2875.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.28172E‐01      2900.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.27842E‐01      2925.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.27520E‐01      2950.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.27204E‐01      2975.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26894E‐01      3000.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26590E‐01      3025.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26292E‐01      3050.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26000E‐01      3074.99      0.00  20.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.25714E‐01      3100.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.25432E‐01      3125.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.25157E‐01      3150.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.24886E‐01      3175.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.24620E‐01      3200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.24359E‐01      3225.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.24103E‐01      3250.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23852E‐01      3275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
361
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23605E‐01      3300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23362E‐01      3325.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23124E‐01      3350.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.22890E‐01      3375.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.22660E‐01      3400.00      0.00  20.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.22434E‐01      3425.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.22212E‐01      3450.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21993E‐01      3475.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21778E‐01      3500.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21567E‐01      3525.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21360E‐01      3550.00      0.00  25.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21156E‐01      3575.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.20955E‐01      3600.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.20757E‐01      3625.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.20563E‐01      3650.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.20372E‐01      3675.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
362
12/20/2022

0.20184E‐01      3700.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19999E‐01      3725.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19816E‐01      3750.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19637E‐01      3775.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19460E‐01      3800.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19287E‐01      3825.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19116E‐01      3849.99      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18947E‐01      3875.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18781E‐01      3900.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18617E‐01      3925.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18457E‐01      3950.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18298E‐01      3975.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18142E‐01      4000.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17988E‐01      4025.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17836E‐01      4050.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17686E‐01      4075.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17539E‐01      4100.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
363
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.17394E‐01      4125.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17250E‐01      4150.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17109E‐01      4175.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16970E‐01      4200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16833E‐01      4225.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16697E‐01      4250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16564E‐01      4275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16432E‐01      4300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16303E‐01      4325.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16175E‐01      4350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16048E‐01      4375.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15924E‐01      4400.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15801E‐01      4425.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15679E‐01      4450.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15560E‐01      4475.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15442E‐01      4500.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15325E‐01      4525.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
364
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15210E‐01      4550.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15096E‐01      4575.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14984E‐01      4600.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14873E‐01      4625.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14764E‐01      4650.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14656E‐01      4675.00      0.00  20.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14550E‐01      4700.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14445E‐01      4725.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14341E‐01      4750.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14238E‐01      4775.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14137E‐01      4800.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14037E‐01      4825.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13938E‐01      4850.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13840E‐01      4875.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13744E‐01      4900.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13648E‐01      4925.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
365
12/20/2022

0.13554E‐01      4950.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13461E‐01      4975.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13369E‐01      5000.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
366
12/20/2022

Start date and time  09/20/22 13:25:41

AERSCREEN 21112

Gary Avenue Business Park, Operation

Gary Avenue Business Park, Operation

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  DATA ENTRY VALIDATION  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

METRIC              ENGLISH

** AREADATA **  ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Emission Rate:    0.489E‐02 g/s         0.388E‐01 lb/hr

Area Height:           3.00 meters           9.84 feet

Area Source Length:  203.77 meters         668.54 feet

Area Source Width:   101.88 meters         334.25 feet

Vertical Dimension:    1.50 meters           4.92 feet

Model Mode:           URBAN

Population:          309441

Dist to Ambient Air:           1.0 meters             3. feet

** BUILDING DATA **

City Council
41 –
367
12/20/2022

No Building Downwash Parameters

** TERRAIN DATA **

No Terrain Elevations

Source Base Elevation:   0.0 meters        0.0  feet

Probe distance:   5000. meters       16404. feet

No flagpole receptors

No discrete receptors used

** FUMIGATION DATA **

No fumigation
requested

** METEOROLOGY DATA **

Min/Max Temperature:  250.0 / 310.0 K   ‐9.7 /  98.3 Deg F

Minimum Wind Speed:     0.5 m/s

City Council
41 –
368
12/20/2022

Anemometer Height:   10.000 meters

Dominant Surface Profile: Urban

Dominant Climate Type:    Average Moisture

Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted

DEBUG OPTION ON

AERSCREEN output file:

2022.09.20_AERSCREEN_GaryAveBusinessPark_Operation.out

*** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin

No
terrain used, AERMAP will not be run

**************************************************

SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET

Obtaining surface characteristics...

City Council
41 –
369
12/20/2022

Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo     Bo zo
Winter 0.35     1.50     1.000
Spring 0.14     1.00     1.000
Summer 0.16     2.00     1.000
Autumn 0.18     2.00     1.000
Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR   started 09/20/22 13:32:12
********************************************
Running AERMOD
Processing Winter
Processing surface roughness sector  1

City Council
41 –
370
12/20/2022

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector   5

********   WARNING MESSAGES
********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

City Council
41 –
371
12/20/2022

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  20

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   6

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  25

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

City Council
41 –
372
12/20/2022

Processing wind flow sector   7

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector  30

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

********************************************

Running AERMOD

Processing Spring

Processing surface roughness sector  1

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes
Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector   5

City Council
41 –
373
12/20/2022

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage
2 Spring sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector  20

City Council
41 –
374
12/20/2022

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   6

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector  25

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   7

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2
Spring sector  30

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

********************************************

Running AERMOD

Processing Summer

Processing surface roughness sector  1

City Council
41 –
375
12/20/2022

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector   5

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

City Council
41 –
376
12/20/2022

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  20

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***
NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   6

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  25

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   7

City Council
41 –
377
12/20/2022

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector  30

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

********************************************

Running AERMOD

Processing Autumn

Processing surface roughness sector  1

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   1

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2
Autumn sector   0

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   2

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector   5

City Council
41 –
378
12/20/2022

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   3

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  10

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   4

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2
Autumn sector  15

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

***  NONE  ***

*****************************************************

Processing wind flow sector   5

AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  20

********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

City Council
41 –
379
12/20/2022

***  NONE  ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector   6
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  25 ********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********
***  NONE  ***
*****************************************************
Processing wind flow sector   7
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector  30 ********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********
***  NONE  ***
FLOWSECTOR   ended 09/20/22 13:32:21
REFINE started  09/20/22 13:32:21
AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector   0 ********   WARNING MESSAGES   ********

City Council
41 –
380
12/20/2022

***  NONE  ***
REFINE ended  09/20/22 13:32:23
**********************************************
AERSCREEN Finished Successfully
With no errors or warnings
Check log file for details
***********************************************
Ending date and time  09/20/22 13:32:24

City Council
41 –
381
12/20/2022

Concentration     Distance Elevation  Diag  Season/Month   Zo sector       Date H0     U*     W*  DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH  M‐O LEN    Z0  BOWEN ALBEDO  REF WS     HT REF TA     HT

0.59207E+01         1.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.64635E+01        25.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.69177E+01        50.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.72965E+01        75.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.77045E+01       100.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0
*  0.77347E+01       103.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.58887E+01       125.00      0.00  20.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.41951E+01       150.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.34051E+01       175.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.28489E+01       200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.24338E+01       225.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21121E+01       250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18583E+01       275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16530E+01       300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14834E+01       325.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13430E+01       350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
382
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.12235E+01 375.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11216E+01 400.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10335E+01 425.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.95643E+00 450.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.88932E+00 475.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.83039E+00 500.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.77716E+00 525.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.72950E+00 550.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.68686E+00 575.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.64851E+00 600.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.61386E+00 625.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.58210E+00 650.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.55305E+00 675.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.52649E+00 700.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.50213E+00 725.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.47956E+00 750.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.45869E+00 775.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
383
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.43938E+00 800.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.42147E+00 825.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.40480E+00 850.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38909E+00 875.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.37443E+00 900.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.36071E+00 925.00       0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.34787E+00 950.01       0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.33580E+00 975.00       0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.32444E+00      1000.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.31375E+00      1025.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.30366E+00      1050.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.29414E+00      1075.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.28513E+00      1100.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.27659E+00      1125.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26846E+00      1150.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.26072E+00      1175.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
384
12/20/2022

0.25337E+00      1200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.24638E+00      1225.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23971E+00      1250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.23331E+00      1275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.22721E+00      1300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.22137E+00      1325.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21580E+00      1350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.21046E+00      1375.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.20536E+00      1400.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.20047E+00      1425.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19578E+00      1450.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.19127E+00      1475.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18694E+00      1500.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.18278E+00      1525.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17878E+00      1550.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17493E+00      1575.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.17122E+00      1600.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
385
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.16765E+00      1625.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16421E+00      1650.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.16089E+00      1675.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15768E+00      1700.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15458E+00      1725.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.15159E+00      1750.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14869E+00      1775.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14589E+00      1800.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14319E+00      1825.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.14057E+00      1850.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13803E+00      1875.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13647E+00      1900.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13405E+00      1925.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.13170E+00      1950.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12942E+00      1975.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12721E+00      2000.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12506E+00      2025.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
386
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12297E+00      2050.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.12095E+00      2075.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11898E+00      2100.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11707E+00      2125.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11521E+00      2150.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11340E+00      2175.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.11164E+00      2200.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10992E+00      2225.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10825E+00      2250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10663E+00      2275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10504E+00      2300.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10350E+00      2325.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10199E+00      2350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.10052E+00      2375.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.99094E‐01      2400.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.97698E‐01      2425.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
387
12/20/2022

0.96335E‐01      2450.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.95005E‐01      2475.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.93706E‐01      2500.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.92438E‐01      2525.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.91199E‐01      2550.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.89989E‐01      2575.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.88807E‐01      2600.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.87651E‐01      2625.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.86520E‐01      2650.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.85415E‐01      2675.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.84334E‐01      2700.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.83277E‐01      2725.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.82242E‐01      2750.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.81229E‐01      2775.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.80238E‐01      2800.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.79267E‐01      2825.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.78317E‐01      2850.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
388
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.77386E‐01      2875.00      0.00  10.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.76475E‐01      2900.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.75581E‐01      2925.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.74706E‐01      2950.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.73848E‐01      2975.00      0.00  10.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.73007E‐01      3000.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.72182E‐01      3025.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.71373E‐01      3050.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.70580E‐01      3074.99      0.00  20.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.69802E‐01      3100.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.69039E‐01      3125.00      0.00  10.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.68290E‐01      3150.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.67555E‐01      3174.99      0.00  10.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.66834E‐01      3199.99      0.00  10.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.66126E‐01      3225.00      0.00  10.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.65431E‐01      3250.00      0.00  10.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.64748E‐01      3275.00      0.00  20.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
389
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.64078E‐01      3300.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.63419E‐01      3325.00      0.00  15.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.62772E‐01      3350.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.62137E‐01      3375.00      0.00  15.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.61512E‐01      3400.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.60899E‐01      3425.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.60296E‐01      3450.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.59703E‐01      3475.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.59120E‐01      3500.00      0.00  20.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.58547E‐01      3525.00      0.00  25.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.57983E‐01      3550.00      0.00   5.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.57429E‐01      3575.00      0.00  15.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.56884E‐01      3600.00      0.00  15.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.56348E‐01      3625.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.55820E‐01      3650.00      0.00   0.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.55302E‐01      3675.00      0.00  20.0 Winter 0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
390
12/20/2022

0.54791E‐01      3700.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.54288E‐01      3725.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.53794E‐01      3750.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.53307E‐01      3775.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.52827E‐01      3800.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.52356E‐01      3825.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.51891E‐01      3849.99      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.51433E‐01      3875.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.50983E‐01      3900.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.50539E‐01      3925.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.50102E‐01      3950.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.49671E‐01      3975.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.49247E‐01      4000.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.48829E‐01      4025.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.48417E‐01      4050.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.48011E‐01      4075.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.47611E‐01      4100.00      0.00  25.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0

City Council
41 –
391
12/20/2022

310.0    2.0

0.47217E‐01      4125.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.46828E‐01      4150.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.46445E‐01      4175.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.46067E‐01      4200.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.45694E‐01      4225.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.45327E‐01      4250.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.44965E‐01      4275.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.44608E‐01      4300.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.44255E‐01      4325.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.43908E‐01      4350.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.43565E‐01      4375.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.43226E‐01      4400.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.42893E‐01      4425.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.42563E‐01      4450.00      0.00  10.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.42238E‐01      4475.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.41918E‐01      4500.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.41601E‐01      4525.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001

City Council
41 –
392
12/20/2022

‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.41289E‐01      4550.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.40980E‐01      4575.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.40676E‐01      4600.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.40376E‐01      4625.00      0.00  25.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.40079E‐01      4650.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.39786E‐01      4675.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.39497E‐01      4700.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.39211E‐01      4725.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38929E‐01      4750.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38651E‐01      4775.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38376E‐01      4800.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.38104E‐01      4825.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.37836E‐01      4850.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.37570E‐01      4875.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.37308E‐01      4900.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.37050E‐01      4924.99      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
393
12/20/2022

0.36794E‐01      4950.00      0.00   5.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.36541E‐01      4975.00      0.00  15.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

0.36291E‐01      5000.00      0.00   0.0        Winter       0‐360   10011001 ‐1.30  0.043 ‐9.000  0.020 ‐999.   21.      6.0 1.000   1.50   0.35    0.50   10.0 310.0    2.0

City Council
41 –
394
12/20/2022

2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G,
C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Cha
racterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment C

City Council
41 –
395
12/20/2022

2 • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large s olar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California d rinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of ga soline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout C alifornia.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the f ormer U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE u se, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate u se, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, r esults of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an en ergy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California an d New York.

City Council
41 –
396
12/20/2022

3 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles t hat met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients an d regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring n etworks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at m ilitary bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development th rough work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater T echnical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the p rotection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through d esignation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted

City Council
41 –
397
12/20/2022

4 public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific

City Council
41 –
398
12/20/2022

5 principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to d etermine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of M edford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental ge ology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).

City Council
41 –
399
12/20/2022

6 Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

City Council
41 –
400
12/20/2022

7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

City Council
41 –
401
12/20/2022

8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.

City Council
41 –
402
12/20/2022

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment D

City Council
41 –
403
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021
Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications:

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342
Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science , 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

City Council
41 –
404
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

City Council
41 –
405
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water.

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International

City Council
41 –
406
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021

Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference.

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust.

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

City Council
41 –
407
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

City Council
41 –
408
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

City Council
41 –
409
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993

Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021

In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case Number 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020

In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No.: 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019

City Council
41 –
410
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021

In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018

In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017

In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017

In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case: No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020

In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018

In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017

City Council
41 –
411
12/20/2022

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021
In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017
In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015
In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015
In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015
In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015
In the Circuit Court of the 17 th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014
In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014
In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012
In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011
In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010
In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009

City Council
41 –
412
12/20/2022

MEMORANDUM
MCT # 62772
TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

Finance & Management Services Agency
Planning and Building Agency
Miscellaneous Cash Transaction
PROJECT NAME: MASTER ID #
PROJECT ADDRESS:

Application # Permit #
AP #
New Warehouse/Industrial Building
1700 E Garry Ave, Santa Ana, CA 92705-5802
2021-166019
ISSUED TO:

ADDRESS:

Michael Lozeau
1939 Harrison Street, Ste 150
Oakland, CA 94612
APPL-2022-1-APC
430-171-07
All fees are subject to change at any time and may also be affected by scheduled adjustments on July 1 of each year. The Payee must pay the prevailing rate at the time payment is made.

Wednesday, October 19, 2022
PAID
1 Appeal (Non-Applicant) $472.00 $472.00 01116002 53606 1.0000 FUND NO.AMOUNTRATEUNITQTYDESCRIPTIONITEM