Santa Ana City Council
April 16, 2024

4 1
8 5

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action. The project will assess the environmental impact for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the requested Appropriation Adjustment will recognize Traffic System Management Grant funds in the amount of $450,000 in the State Grant-Direct, revenue account (No. 14817002-52025) and appropriate the same amount to the Active Transportation Program, Improvements Other than Buildings expenditure account (No. 14817613-66220).

With the approval of the amendment to the FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program, funds will be assigned, budgeted, and available for expenditure in FY 2023-24. Future phases of these projects will be budgeted in future Capital Improvement Programs.

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure to deliver this project.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No.

Description
Amount
2023-24 14817613-66220
(23-6029)
Traffic
System
Management
Grant
Active Transportation
Program, Improvements
Other Than Buildings
$450,000
Total $450,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Conceptual Plan

2. Location Map

3. CIP Sheet Project 23-6029

4. Program Supplement Agreement No. A456
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
12 –
2 4/16/2024

City of Santa Ana - Memory Lane and Flower Street Bikeway Attachment D - Page 1

ALL PROPOSED WORK WITHIN EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
3 4/16/2024

City of Santa Ana - Memory Lane and Flower Street Bikeway Attachment D - Page 2

PROPOSED BULB-OUTS

TO SHORTEN CROSSING

ALL PROPOSED WORK WITHIN EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

City Council
12 –
4 4/16/2024

City of Santa Ana - Memory Lane and Flower Street Bikeway Attachment D - Page 3

PROPOSED RAISED

CROSSWALK WITH
RRFB'S

PROPOSED BULB-OUTS

TO SHORTEN CROSSING

ALL PROPOSED WORK WITHIN EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY

City Council
12 –
5 4/16/2024

.
625 feet

MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY
EXHIBIT 2

PROJECT
LIMITS
Memory Lane
Flower St
Bristol St
The City Drive

PROJECT
LIMITS

City Council
12 –
6 4/16/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 23/24CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Construction of bikeway, ADA compliant sidewalks, curb ramps, bulb-outs (curb extensions), raised medians/crosswalks, traffic signal modification and channelization on Memory Lane and Flower Street.

PROJECT NEED:

The City of Santa Ana and City of Orange designed to increase bicyclist and pedestrian safety and mobility.

PROJECT TITLE:

Memory Lane and Flower Street
Bikeway
PROJECT CATEGORY:

Traffic Improvements
Street/Bridge Improvements &
Widening

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works CIP Engineering Gilbert Castillo, Senior Engineer 16-Apr-2024 PROJECT COSTS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Engineering 450,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 450,000 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 ATP 450,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 450,000 - - - - - -
EXHIBIT 3

City Council
12 –
7 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT 4

City Council
12 –
8 4/16/2024

City Council
12 –
9 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 13
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Clean California Bus Stop Improvement Project

AGENDA TITLE
Appropriation Adjustment and Capital Improvement Project Amendment for the Bus Stop Improvement Project (Project No. 24-6985) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1.Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $398,000 in Clean California Local Grant Program grant funds in the Select Street Construction, State Grant-Direct revenue account, and appropriate the same amount into the Select Street Construction, Improvements Other than Buildings expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

2.Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Project to include $398,000 of funding to the Bus Stop Improvement Project (Project No. 24- 6985).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP) is a competitive statewide program created to beautify and clean local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, transit centers, and other public spaces. A total amount of $114.5 million was made available statewide for projects that reduce waste and debris, install measures to beautify and improve public spaces and mitigate the urban heat island effect, improve public spaces for walking and recreation, and advance equity for underserved communities.

The Public Works Agency submitted a successful application for $398,000 of funding for Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus stop facility improvements throughout the city (Exhibit 1). This project will provide one new bus shelter, 34 benches, 28 trash bins, two trees, and up to five selected sidewalk repairs. These improvements foster the District Transit Partnership’s primary objective of enhancing the cleanliness and attractiveness of bus stops within the city. The shelter and benches will afford transit users the ability to comfortably sit while waiting for bus arrivals and the new trash bins will decrease the amount of litter and debris at the bus shelters.

City Council
13 –
1 4/16/2024

Clean California Bus Stop Improvement Plan
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 2
The City received a Notice to Proceed on January 8, 2024 in the amount of $398,000 from CCLGP (Exhibit 2). A resolution authorizing the Executive Director of the Public Works Agency (Exhibit 3) to enter into a Restricted Grant Agreement (RGA) with Caltrans was approved on December 19, 2023 (Exhibit 4). The Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP) can be applied to projects that beautify and clean local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, transit centers, and other public spaces. These funds were granted and can be applied towards our Bus Stop Improvement Project due to the project providing new and improved benches, trashcans, and sidewalk at bus stops within the scope.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action. The project will assess the environmental impact for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the appropriation adjustment will recognize the receipt of $398,000 via the Select Street Construction, State Grant-Direct revenue account (No. 05917002-52025) and appropriate to the Select Street Construction, Improvements Other than Buildings, expenditure account (No. 05917660-66220).

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available in FY 2023-24 for expenditure to deliver this project. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the current fiscal year will be presented to the City Council for approval to carry forward to FY 2024-25.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit -
Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit, Account
No. Description Amount
Appropriation Adjustment
2023-24 05917660-66220
(24-6985)
Select Street
Construction
Select Street Construction,
Improvements Other Than
Buildings
$398,000
Total $398,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. CIP Sheet Project 24-6985

2. Clean California Transit Program Notice to Proceed

3. Executed Resolution

4. Executed Restricted Grant Agreement
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
13 –
2 4/16/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 23/24CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

This project will provide one new bus shelter, 34 benches, 28 trash bins, two trees, and up to five selected sidewalk repairs. These improvements foster the District Transit Partnership primary objective of enhancing the cleanliness and attractiveness of bus stops within the City of Santa Ana. The shelter and benches will afford transit users the ability to comfortably sit while waiting for bus arrivals and the new trash bins will decrease the amount of litter and debris at the bus shelters.

PROJECT NEED:

The Clean California Local Grant Program (CCLGP) is a competitive statewide program created to beautify and clean up local streets and roads, tribal lands, parks, pathways, transit centers, and other public spaces.

PROJECT TITLE:

Bus Stop Improvements Project
PROJECT CATEGORY:

Street Improvements
Curb, Gutter, Sidewalk
Improvements

LOCATION MAP

CITYWIDE
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works CIP Engineering Gilbert Castillo, Senior Engineer 16-Apr-2024 PROJECT COSTS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Construction 368,000 - - - - - -
Engineering 30,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 398,000 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FED CLEAN WATER 398,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 398,000 - - - - - -
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
13 –
3 4/16/2024

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment”

OFFICE OF CLEAN CALIFORNIA PROGRAM
1120 N St, MS–49(Room HQ-1114) | SACRAMENTO , CA 95814
(559) 917-4185 | FAX (916) 653-5776 TTY 711
www.dot.ca.gov

Clean California Transit Program
NOTICE to PROCEED

January 8, 2024

Mr. Gilbert Castillo
Grantee Project Manager
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, California 92702

Dear Mr. Gilbert Castillo:

Congratulations! The Restricted Grant Agreement (RGA) for the Santa Ana Bus Stop Improvements Project has been fully executed by and between City of Santa Ana and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Please accept this letter as a Notice to Proceed with the scope of work outlined within the Clean California Local Grant Program for Transit executed RGA. Please note, any expenses incurred prior to the execution of the grant agreement or the date of this Notice to Proceed, whichever occurs later, cannot be reimbursed. Clean California Local Grant Program Transit funds shall not supplant other committed funds.

The complete and executed RGA for City of Santa Ana has been inc luded for your records.

The City of Santa Ana has been awarded $ 398,000.00 in Clean California Local Grant Program Transit funds. These funds are reimbursable upon submission to the CALTRANS District Partnership Liaison the Local Agency Invoice Form (LAPM5A). Please not e that only eligible expenses outlined within the approved scope of the work in the RGA will be reimbursed.

The Reimbursement Ratio for this project is 100%. The ratio was calculated by dividing the awarded Clean California Local Grant Program Transit State Funds on the project

City Council
13 –
4 4/16/2024

Mr. Gilbert Castillo, Grantee Project Manager
January 8, 2024

“Provide a safe and reliable transportation network that serves all people and respects the environment” by the total of all approved participating costs. This ratio shall be included in invoices submitted for reimbursement.

Please take before and after geotagged photographs of the project site locations that will have at a minimum the date, time, latitude, and longitude assigned to the images for all the work being performed and delivered.

If the facility has a General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) component, then please provide the following as well:
• Location via lat/long coordinates of individual components (e.g., bus shelter, platform) being improved on
• The unique identifier of these components as it pertains to GTFS transit data feeds

Submit photos to your Clean Ca District Partnership Liaison.

Sincerely,

WALTER YU
Clean CA Program Director

Enclosures

1. Executed RGA.

2. Executed Clean CA Transit Project Proposal.

3. Executed Clean CA Transit Project Deliverables.

c: Dallia Foster
, Clean CA Program Manager
Chanta Apodaca, Clean CA Strategic Coordinator
Eric Corona, CALTRANS District Partnership Liaison

Dallia Foster (Jan 8, 2024 15:21 PST)

City Council
13 –
5 4/16/2024

12_TRANSIT_06-Notice To Proceed
Final Audit Report 2024-01-08
Created: 2024-01-08
By: Dallia Foster ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAD_L4e4nIFiLg3DxxQNene3hbDoiM8zgy "12_TRANSIT_06-Notice To Proceed" History
Document created by Dallia Foster ([email protected])
2024-01-08 - 11:18:40 PM GMT
Document emailed to Dallia Foster ([email protected]) for signature 2024-01-08 - 11:19:04 PM GMT
Email viewed by Dallia Foster ([email protected]) 2024-01-08 - 11:21:15 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Dallia Foster ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-01-08 - 11:21:32 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2024-01-08 - 11:21:32 PM GMT

City Council
13 –
6 4/16/2024

RESOLUTION NO. 2023- 097

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

SANTA ANA AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

OF THE PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY TO EXECUTE

AGREEMENTS WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION FOR THE SANTA ANA BUS STOP

FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana is eligible to receive State funding for certain transportation - related work through the California Department of Transportation; WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana Public Works Agency submitted a successful application for funding from the Clean California Local Grant Program for the Santa Ana Bus Stop Facility Improvements Project;
WHEREAS, a Restricted Grant Agreement is needed to be executed with the California Department of Transportation before such funds can be claimed through the Clean California Local Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to delegate authorization to execute these Agreements and amendments thereto.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana as follows:

Section 1. The Executive Director of the Public Works Agency, or designee, is authorized to execute all Grant Agreements and any amendments thereto with the California Department of Transportation for the Santa Ana Bus Stop Facility Improvements Project.

Section 2. This Resolution shalltake effect immediatelyupon its adoption by the City Council, and the Clerk of the Council shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.

ADOPTED this 19thday of Deceml
Resolution No. 2023- 097

EXHIBIT 3

City Council
13 –
7 4/16/2024

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
Byl" aVL Nru-
Brandon Salvatierra
AcQADeputyCityAttorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
Amezcua Bacerra, Hernandez, Lopez,
Penaloza Phan Vazquez ( 7)
None ( 0)
None ( 0)
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers None ( 0)

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, JENNIFERL. HALL, City Clerk, do herebyattestto and certifythe attachedResolution No. 2023-097 to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on December 19, 2023.

Date: `4C("PWga a-s
Jennifer
of Santa
Resolution No. 2023- 097

City Council
13 –
8 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
9 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
10 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
11 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
12 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
13 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
14 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
15 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
16 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
17 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
18 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
19 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
20 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
21 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
22 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
23 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
24 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
25 4/16/2024

City Council
13 –
26 4/16/2024

01/08/2023
Dallia Foster (Jan 8, 2024 15:20 PST)
01/08/2024

City Council
13 –
27 4/16/2024

12-Transit-06 RGA_ FINAL
Final Audit Report 2024-01-08
Created: 2024-01-08
By: Dallia Foster ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAWlDVqVDUzflurEJlunvAnjI3LiAQh7wQ "12-Transit-06 RGA_ FINAL" History
Document created by Dallia Foster ([email protected])
2024-01-08 - 11:08:18 PM GMT
Document emailed to Dallia Foster ([email protected]) for signature 2024-01-08 - 11:08:51 PM GMT
Email viewed by Dallia Foster ([email protected]) 2024-01-08 - 11:20:36 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Dallia Foster ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2024-01-08 - 11:20:54 PM GMT - Time Source: server Agreement completed.
2024-01-08 - 11:20:54 PM GMT

City Council
13 –
28 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 14
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Projects

AGENDA TITLE
Appropriation Adjustments and Capital Improvement Project Amendments for the Santa Ana Zoo Stormwater Capture and Diversion Project (Project No. 24-6604) and the New Washington Well Project (Project No. 19-6423) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $2,603,525 in Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) grant funds from the California Department of Water Resources into the Miscellaneous Revenue, State Grants- Indirect Revenue Account and appropriate the same amount into the Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Program, Improvements Other than Buildings expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program to include $2,603,525 of funding from the Department of Water Resources Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program for the Santa Ana Zoo Stormwater Capture and Diversion Project.

3. Approve an appropriation adjustment to recognize $3,394,743 in Prop 1 IRWM Grant Funds from the California Department of Water Resources into the Miscellaneous Revenue, State Grants-Indirect Revenue Account and appropriate the same amount into the Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Program, Improvements Other than Buildings expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)

4. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program to include $3,394,743 of funding from the Department of Water Resources Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program for the New Washington Well Project.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

City Council
14 –
1 4/16/2024

Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Projects April 16, 2024

4 1
7 6

DISCUSSION
In November 2014, California voters passed Proposition 1, the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014. Proposition 1 authorized $7.545 billion in general obligation bonds to fund, in part, water resource projects identified as regional priorities through local Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Plans. In April 2023, City staff was notified of funding awards for two projects from Round 2 of the Proposition 1 IRWM program (Exhibit 1).

Washington Well Project
The majority of the City of Santa Ana’s potable water comes from the Orange County Groundwater Basin (OC Basin) and is pumped through 21 existing City wells. Due to a variety of issues, including the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) found in routine well monitoring, several wells in the City have been taken offline. Given the limited water supplies in the region, and recent recurring drought conditions, removing wells from the City’s potable water distribution system will reduce its reliability.

Rehabilitating existing wells or constructing new wells will reduce the burden on other City water production facilities and the reliance on imported water sources.

The Water Resources Division is currently in the initial phase of drilling for the Washington Well Project, which will ultimately construct a new well that will address low-pressure deficiencies in the distribution system and will add approximately 4,000 acre-feet per year to the City’s pumping capacity. The current Proposition 1, Round 2 IRWM grant funding will provide up to $3,394,743 in grant funds for the construction of the well. The City has already received grant funding in the amount of $100,000 from the Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority for the design of the project, and $750,000 from the United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation for construction.

The total construction cost for drilling the well is $3,432,274, with an anticipated equipping cost of $4,500,000.

The well drilling phase of construction is anticipated to have a completion date in August 2024. Equipping and commissioning of the well should be completed by winter of 2026.

Santa Ana Zoo Stormwater Capture and Diversion Project
The Santa Ana Zoo Stormwater Capture and Diversion (SAZSCAD) Project features the construction of subsurface stormwater infiltration systems at the Santa Ana Zoo. The project is designed to capture and infiltrate approximately 67 acre-feet per year (AFY) of stormwater and dry-weather runoff to help improve water quality in the Newport Bay watershed, increase local water supplies, and reduce flooding downstream. The project will also include a new urban green space, bioswales, pervious pavement, seating, drought tolerant landscaping and shade trees, and interpretive signage promoting watershed and water quality education to Zoo visitors. The Public Works Agency has collaborated with Santa Ana Zoo staff on the project and Caltrans is a project partner.

The project has received letters of support from the Regional Water Board, Orange County Water District, and a local environmental nonprofit.

City Council
14 –
2 4/16/2024

Proposition 1 Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Projects April 16, 2024

4 1
7 6
The final design phase of the project will start upon approval of the Proposition 1 IRWM grant funding and take approximately 1-year to complete. Construction is anticipated to start in fall 2025.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action. The project design consultant will assess the environmental impact of this project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the requested appropriation adjustments will accept Proposition 1 IRWM grant funding of $5,998,268 from the California Department of Water Resources into the PWA Enterprise Capital Grants, Miscellaneous Revenue, State Grants-Indirect Revenue Account (No. 16417002-52027) and appropriate the same amount into the Proposition 1 IRWM Program, Improvements Other than Buildings (No. 16417643- 66220). With the approval of the amendments to the FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program, funds will be budgeted and available for expenditure in FY 2023-24 (Exhibits 2 & 3). The remaining balance not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to the City Council for approval of carryovers to FY 2024-25.

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted and available for expenditure to deliver this project.

Fiscal Year
Accounting Unit -
Account No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No. Description Amount
Appropriation Adjustments
2023-24 16417643-66220
(24-6604)
PWA
Enterprise
Capital Grants
Prop 1 IRWM Program,
Improvements Other Than
Buildings
$2,603,525
2023-24 16417643-66220
(19-6423)
PWA
Enterprise
Capital Grants
Prop 1 IRWM Program,
Improvements Other Than
Buildings
$3,394,743
Total $5,998,268

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Prop 1 IRWM Round 2 Funding Award List

2. SAZCAD Project FY 2023-24 CIP Sheet

3. New Washington Well Project FY 2023-24 CIP Sheet
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
14 –
3 4/16/2024

Final Funding Recommendations – Round 2 Integrated Regional Water Management (IRWM) Implementation Grant Solicitation

April 2023

IRWM Region: Santa Ana Applicant: Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Project Name Project Implementing Agency
Primary
Benefit
DAC Implementation Funds General Implementation Funds
Requested Awarded Requested Awarded
Grant Administration Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority N/A $1,352,929 $1,352,929 Santa Ana Watershed Weather Modification Pilot
Project Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Water Supply $861,400 $861,400 Etiwanda Intervalley Water Quality and Water
Resiliency Project Phase-1A Jurupa Community Services District Water Supply $2,954,213 $2,954,213 Wellhead Nitrate Treatment for Wells 4 & 27 Monte Vista Water District Water Supply $2,533,492 $2,533,492 Cable Creek Basin (Upper) San Bernardino County Flood Control District Stormwater and
Flood
Management
$2,521,678 $2,521,678
Lake Elsinore Algae Harvesting and Nutrient
Removal Pilot Project Lake Elsinore and San Jacinto Watersheds Authority Water Quality $1,500,000 $1,500,000 Lake Rialto Habitat Management and Community
Open Space Project City of Rialto Water Quality $2,149,748 $2,149,748 Well 2 Replacement Monte Vista Water District Water Supply $2,006,311 $2,006,311 New Washington Well Project City of Santa Ana Water Supply $3,394,743 $3,394,743 Water Quality: Lead Service Line Replacements in
the Bloomington DAC West Valley Water District Water Quality $315,000 $315,000 Box Springs Mutual Water Company Well
Improvement Project Box Springs Mutual Water Company Water Supply $1,885,257 $385,257 $1,500,000 Orange County Regional PFAS Groundwater
Treatment Program Orange County Water District Water Supply $4,200,000 $4,200,000 Santa Ana Zoo Stormwater Capture and Diversion
Project City of Santa Ana
Stormwater and
Flood
Management
$2,603,525 $2,603,525
Making Conservation an Orange County Way of Life Municipal Water District of Orange County Water Conservation
$780,275 $780,275
Totals: $5,595,000 $4,095,000 $23,463,571 $24,963,571 Total Final Award $29,058,571

Funding Area: Santa Ana
Cycle 2 Award: $29,058,571

City Council
14 –
4 4/16/2024

City Council
14 –
5 4/16/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA FY
23/24
CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Design of a new groundwater well.

PROJECT NEED:

A new well will help increase the reliability and performance of the water system and improve customer experience.

PROJECT TITLE:

Washington Well Site Improvements
PROJECT CATEGORY:

Utility/Drainage/Lighting
Improvements
Water Improvements

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY:

DIVISION:

CONTACT:

DATE:

Public Works
Water Resources
Armando Fernandez, Senior Civil Engineer
19-Mar-2024

PROJECT COSTS
FY 23/24
FY 24/25
FY 25/26
FY 26/27
FY 27/28
FY 28/29
FY 29/30
Construction
3,394,743
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
3,394,743
-
-
-
-
-
-

SOURCE OF FUNDS
FY 23/24
FY 24/25
FY 25/26
FY 26/27
FY 27/28
FY 28/29
FY 29/30
Prop 1 IRWM Grant
3,394,743
-
-
-
-
-
-
TOTAL
3,394,743
-
-
-
-
-
-

City Council
14 –
6 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 15
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Services

AGENDA TITLE
Blanket Order Contract to US Gain, a Division of US Venture Inc., for Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Services (Spec No. 24-049) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Award Blanket Order Contract to US Gain, a Division of US Venture Inc., for compressed natural gas fueling services, in amount not to exceed $240,000, on an as- needed basis, for an initial one-year term beginning April 16, 2024 and expiring April 15, 2025, with provisions for one, one-year renewal option.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
The City’s Public Works Agency utilizes a variety of heavy equipment vehicles and trucks to deliver street maintenance, water, and sewer services. The City recently completed its goal of transitioning all heavy equipment vehicles from diesel fuel- powered to natural gas-powered.

On August 17, 2021, the City Council approved an agreement with OPAL Fuels Station Services, LLC (formerly TruStar Energy, LLC) to provide services for Phase I, Design; Phase II, Equipment Procurement; and Phase III, Construction of a new Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling station at the City Corporate Yard. On December 20, 2022, the City Council approved an amendment to the agreement with OPAL Fuels Station Services to update the agreement’s scope of work to include a publicly-accessible fuel station.

The City’s 31 CNG-powered vehicles had been fueling at the City’s Corporate Yard with supplemental fueling performed at a US Gain fueling station located within City boundaries at 1601 East 1st Street. During the past few months, the Corporate Yard’s CNG station stopped being functional and after numerous maintenance and repair services efforts, it has been determined to be cost-prohibitive to repair Corporate Yard’s CNG station. The above-mentioned project with OPAL Fuels Station Services is over a year away from completion. Staff is requesting contract authority to allow for CNG fueling services with US Gain, which will allow City CNG-powered fleet vehicles to

City Council
15 –
1 4/16/2024

Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Services
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 8
continue their everyday operations without any fueling interruptions while City staff actively seeks contracting options for CNG fueling services.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is available in the current FY 2023-24 budget and funding for subsequent fiscal year will be included in the proposed budget for City Council consideration.

Fiscal Year Accounting
Unit- Account
#
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account
Description
Amount
2023-24
Apr – Jun
07617102-
63301
Stores & Property
Control
Stores & Property
Control, Alternative
Fuel-CNG
$45,000
2024-25 07617102-
63301
Stores & Property
Control
Stores & Property
Control, Alternative
Fuel-CNG
$120,000
2025-26 07617102-
63301
Stores & Property
Control
Stores & Property
Control, Alternative
Fuel-CNG
$75,000
TOTAL $240,000
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
15 –
2 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 16
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Manhole Covers, Water Valves, and Covers

AGENDA TITLE
Aggregate Blanket Order Contracts to Famcon Pipe & Supply, Inc. and Core & Main for Manhole Covers, Water Valves, and Covers in an Aggregate Amount Not to Exceed $1,235,000 (Specification No. 24-019) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Award aggregate blanket order contracts to Famcon Pipe & Supply, Inc. and Core & Main for the purchase of manhole covers, water valves, and covers on an as-needed basis in an aggregate amount not to exceed $1,235,000, for a two-year term beginning April 16, 2024 and expiring April 15, 2026, with provisions for three, one-year renewal options.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Water Resources Division (Water Resources Division) oversees the operation of 21 City-owned wells, seven pump stations, 50 water quality monitoring stations, 10 storage reservoirs, over 480 miles of water pipeline, and over 450 miles of sewer mains.

The Water Resources Division, Sewer Maintenance section maintains the City’s sanitary sewer infrastructure. Sewer manholes are essential to any sewer system as they provide access points to assess the system. Having standard manhole frames and covers eliminates the guess work for replacement parts and fast response to emergency replacement.

Additionally, the Water Resources Division, Water Maintenance section maintains the City’s water distribution system. Water valves serve as access points to turn off water at certain points in the system for repairs and maintenance to the distribution infrastructure. Standardizing gate valve frame and covers are essential to the efficient replacement of old, dilapidated frames and covers in the system.

The Invitation for Bids (IFB) No. 24-019 was advertised on February 8, 2024 on the

City Council
16 –
1 4/16/2024

Manhole Covers, Water Valves, and Covers
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 7
City’s online bid management and publication system. A summary of IFB vendor participation and results is as follows:
43 Vendors notified
2 Santa Ana vendors notified
18 Vendors downloaded the bid packet
2 Bids received
1 Bid received from Santa Ana vendors
Bids were solicited, opened on February 27, 2024, and evaluated (Exhibit 1). Two bids were submitted by the IFB deadline, and both bids submitted by Famcon Pipe & Supply, Inc. of Oxnard, CA, and Core & Main of Santa Ana, CA were determined to be the lowest responsible bids, were responsive to the specifications of the bid, and met the City’s requirements. Staff recommends awarding contracts to Famcon Pipe & Supply, Inc. and Core & Main to ensure availability of resources. Famcom Pipe is a new vendor to Santa Ana, but has been in business for waterworks materials and supplies since the 1980’s. Core and Main became an independent company in 2017, and has been a provider of various waterworks supplies and materials for the City for multiple projects.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is available in the current FY 2023-24 budget and funding for subsequent fiscal years will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council consideration.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit-
Account #
Fund Description Accounting Unit,
Account
Description
Amount
05617640-63001 Sanitary Sewer
Fund
Sanitary Sewer
Service,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$50,000
FY 23-24
Apr - Jun
06017641-63001 Water Fund
Water System
Maintenance,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$30,000
FY 24-25 05617640-63001 Sanitary Sewer
Fund
Sanitary Sewer
Service,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$165,000
06017641-63001 Water Fund
Water System
Maintenance,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$82,000
FY 25-26 05617640-63001 Sanitary Sewer
Fund
Sanitary Sewer
Service,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$165,000

City Council
16 –
2 4/16/2024

Manhole Covers, Water Valves, and Covers
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 7
Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit-
Account #
Fund Description Accounting Unit,
Account
Description
Amount
06017641-63001 Water Fund
Water System
Maintenance,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$82,000
05617640-63001 Sanitary Sewer
Fund
Sanitary Sewer
Service,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$165,000
FY 26-27
06017641-63001 Water Fund
Water System
Maintenance,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$82,000
05617640-63001 Sanitary Sewer
Fund
Sanitary Sewer
Service,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$165,000
FY 27-28
06017641-63001 Water Fund
Water System
Maintenance,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$82,000
05617640-63001 Sanitary Sewer
Fund
Sanitary Sewer
Service,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$115,000
FY 28-29
Jul - Apr
06017641-63001 Water Fund
Water System
Maintenance,
Miscellaneous
Operating Expenses
$52,000
TOTAL $1,235,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Bid Abstract
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
16 –
3 4/16/2024

BIDDER LOCATION TOTAL
Famcon Pipe & Supply, Inc. Oxnard, CA 222,660 $
Core & Main Santa Ana, CA 237,429 $
MANHOLE LIDS, WATER VALVES, & Covers (Bid No. 24-019)

ABSTRACT OF BIDS
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
16 –
4 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 17
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: West Side Bleacher Seating at Santa Ana Stadium

AGENDA TITLE
Purchase Order to Southern Bleacher Company, Inc. for the Purchase and Installation of Bleacher Seating in an Amount Not to Exceed $549,214 (Specification No. 24-045) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize a one-time purchase and payment of a purchase order to Southern Bleacher Company, Inc. for bleacher seating and corresponding installation services for the Santa Ana Stadium in the amount of $499,285, plus a contingency amount of $49,929, for a total amount not to exceed $549,214.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Parks Maintenance Division is responsible for overseeing and repairing various parks and facilities. The City-owned Santa Ana Stadium (Stadium) is a multifunctional, outdoor stadium that hosts many events including local sports leagues, football, and soccer games, high schools and college athletics, commencement ceremonies, and various citywide events. Additionally, the 9,000-seat stadium has hosted national and international soccer leagues for exhibition games. The programming at the Santa Ana Stadium provides leisure, recreation, and entertainment opportunities for residents and highlights our city facility to outside visitors.

The Public Works staff, in collaboration with Parks and Recreation staff, have evaluated the seating at the Stadium and determined that improvements were necessary to support the various sporting and recreation events hosted at this site. Due to prolonged sun exposure and consistent usage, the current seating has broken plastic seats and has faded in color. The installation of new seating (Project No. 24-2602) will provide suitable and safe seating for stadium patrons and a comfortable viewing experience for City residents and visitors alike. Installation of new seating will entail demolition of current existing west side seating by our Public Works General Maintenance staff and the Southern Bleacher Company will provide aluminum seating, backrest materials, and installation at the west side of the stadium (Exhibit 1).

City Council
17 –
1 4/16/2024

West Side Bleacher Seating for the Santa Ana Stadium
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 9
Santa Ana City Ordinance No. NS-3401 authorizes the City to purchase against contracts from any public agency utilizing a competitive bid process. BuyBoard, a cooperative government purchasing agency, awarded a contract to Southern Bleacher Company, Inc. (Contract No. 665-22) as a result of open, competitive bidding on behalf of its members, which includes government agencies.

Staff researched available procurement options and product offerings in the market, and determined that Southern Bleacher Company, Inc. meets the City’s specifications. By leveraging the procurement power through cooperative purchasing, the City of Santa Ana is able to obtain nationally vetted, high quality products at competitive volume pricing, and is in accordance with the City’s existing Purchasing guidelines.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds for the requested Purchase Order of $549,214 for materials and installation is available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2023-24. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be carried forward to the following fiscal year.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit-Account #
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account
Description
Amount
2023-24
01113017-
66220
(24-2602)
General Fund
PRCSA Service
Enhancement-
Improvements Other
Than Building
549,214
TOTAL $549,214

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Bleacher Replacement Location
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
17 –
2 4/16/2024

Stadiu1n Seat Replacement
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
17 –
3 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 18
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project

AGENDA TITLE
Amendment to Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company for Grant Writing Services (Project No. 22-6899 & 24-6899) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment to the agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. for grant writing services for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation in the amount of $69,654, with a contingency amount of $10,346, for a new total agreement amount of $330,000 (Agreement No. A-2024-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
The proposed Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation is adjacent to the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC), and will include a new six-lane underpass to replace the existing at-grade rail crossing at the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) double tracks on Santa Ana Boulevard. This project will provide connectivity across Santa Ana Boulevard to SARTC, and improvements will also include a raised median, bike lanes, sidewalks, storm water pump station, space for a transportation opportunity zone, and a pedestrian plaza.

On September 27, 2021, the Public Works Agency released Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 21-111, by which it sought the services of a professional engineering firm to provide grant writing services for the Public Works Agency Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project. Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. was awarded an agreement based upon the scope of work and selection criteria outlined in the RFP.

Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. has submitted several grant applications for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation as part of the original agreement scope, including one successful grant award of $7,000,000. Staff recommends executing an amendment to the current agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. to provide grant writing services for an additional three grant applications, including the Railroad Crossing Elimination Program (RCE), Trade Corridor Enhancement Program (CEP), and

City Council
18 –
1 4/16/2024

Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation Project
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 3
Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods (RCN) Program for the Santa Ana Boulevard Grade Separation project (Exhibit 1).

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are budgeted and available for expenditure in the current Fiscal Year 2023-24.

The following table summarizes the reallocation of funds that will be budgeted to fund the grant writing services per the agreement amendment. Since the scope of work is contingent on the schedule of future grant applications prepared and submitted, any remaining balances not expended at the end of the agreement term will be carried forward for expenditure into FY 2024-25 and FY 2025-26 in the event the optional extension periods are exercised.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Agreement Amendment with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc.

Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager
Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit -
Account No.

Fund
Description
Accounting
Unit - Account
No. Description
Amount
Current Project Budget
2023-24 03217662-66220
(Proj. 22-6899)
Measure M
Street
Construction
Measure M2
Local Fairshare,
Improvements
Other Than
Buildings
$250,000
Amendment
2023-24 03217662-66220
(Proj. 24-6899)
Measure M
Street
Construction
Measure M2
Local Fairshare,
Improvements
Other Than
Buildings
$80,000
TOTAL: $330,000

City Council
18 –
2 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
18 –
3 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
4 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
5 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
6 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
7 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
8 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
9 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
10 4/16/2024

City Council
18 –
11 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 19
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Site Sublicense Agreement For Bus Passenger Services

AGENDA TITLE
Site License Agreement with Pacific Coast Shuttles, LLC, dba Futura Bus Net, Inc to allow for Sublicense Agreement with Ohana Shuttles, LLC for Bus Passenger Services at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to amend the site license agreement with Pacific Coast Shuttles, LLC, dba Futura Bus Net, Inc., to allow for a sub-license agreement with Ohana Shuttles, LLC to compensate the City $1,500 per month for the rental of one bus bay for bus passenger services at the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center, for a one-year term beginning May 1, 2024 and ending April 30, 2025, with the option for three, one-year renewal periods (Agreement No. 2024-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
The Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) is a regional transportation hub that brings together Amtrak, Metrolink, Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and interstate bus services. It is open to the public seven days a week from 5:00 a.m. to midnight and contains approximately 35,000 square feet of total rental space, including ten bus bays.

In October 2023, the City Council approved a site license agreement with Pacific Coast Shuttles, LLC authorizing the use of Bus Bay #8 to provide interstate bus services for a six-month term, with the option for four one-year renewals. Due to the positive outcome, the Licensee would like to sublicense this bay to their sister company, Ohana Shuttles, to address the high demand in Orange County and provide a higher level of service for their patrons. Ohana Shuttles, LLC began in 2022 and provides the same bus passenger services.

Staff recommends amending the site license agreement with Pacific Coast Shuttles, LLC, to allow for a sublicense agreement with Ohana Shuttles, LLC to license one bus bay for a one-year period, with three one-year renewal options (Exhibit 1).

City Council
19 –
1 4/16/2024

Site Sublicense Agreement For Bus Passenger Services
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 4

FISCAL IMPACT
Following the approval of the agreement amendment, lease income totaling $3,000 for Fiscal Year 2023-24, at a rate of $1,500 per month, will be recognized into the Public Works Agency-SARTC Operations, Rental-Ohana Shuttles revenue account.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit-
Account No.

Fund
Description
Accounting Unit-
Account No.

Description
Amount
FY 23-24 06717002-
53835
Regional
Transportation
Center

PWA-SARTC
Operations – Rental –
Ohana Shuttles
$3,000
TOTAL $3,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Site Sublicense Agreement with Ohana Shuttles, LLC
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
19 –
2 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
19 –
3 4/16/2024

City Council
19 –
4 4/16/2024

City Council
19 –
5 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 20
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Santa Ana Zoo Educational Hub Building Project

AGENDA TITLE
Amend Agreement with LOC Architects to Increase the Design Services for the Santa Ana Zoo Educational Hub Building Project (Project No. 23-2601)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a first amendment to the consultant agreement with LOC Architects for design services for the Santa Ana Zoo Educational Hub Project (Project No. 23-2601) to increase the amount by $123,400, for a total amount not to exceed $508,520 (Agreement No. A-2024-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
On May 3, 2022, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the acceptance of grant funds from the State of California Natural Resources Agency for the Santa Ana Zoo Educational Hub Building Project, and authorized the City Manager to execute grant documents. The new educational hub building will include a large multipurpose space, classrooms, and serve as a hub for community volunteers and zoo staff. The classrooms are flexible in design to maximize their use potential throughout the day and year. The 2,600 square foot multipurpose space is also designed so it can serve as a rental space at times, generating additional revenue.

On February 22, 2023, the Public Works Agency (PWA) released a Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 23-033 to select a professional architectural services firm for the Santa Ana Zoo Educational Hub Building project. These services include all design and engineering as required for the project scope. After reviewing all proposals, an agreement was executed with LOC Architects on August 1, 2023.

The RFP and initial award of the contract to LOC Architects was for the design of one new “Hive” building. Site and underground surveys revealed that several trees and an Edison easement conflicted with the new building location. Additional office spaces and a multi-functional room which can be used as both a classroom and community event space will allow for expanded programming. After consideration of several design concepts that would accommodate these factors and meet the needs of the community, Staff recommends that the scope of this project now includes two buildings separated

City Council
20 –
1 4/16/2024

Santa Ana Zoo Educational Hub Building Project
April 16, 2024

4 1
8 0
by a gathering space (exhibit attached). This new scope will increase the square footage of the project, and additional cost for the structural and electrical design, without compromising design efforts.

An amendment to the current agreement will increase the total agreement amount to $508,520 (Exhibit 2). PWA and Parks and Recreation staff provided the best design program possible in the RFP for services prior to commencing design, but after thorough assessment of project and the needs of LOC Architects, staff recommends the approval of the recommended action as the change provides the best long-term project for the City.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. The originally approved project cost total will not change.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Site Plan

2. Agreement Amendment
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
20 –
2 4/16/2024

City Council
20 –
3 4/16/2024

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF

SANTA ANA AND LOC ARCHITECTS TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL

ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE SANTA ANA ZOO

EDUCATIONAL HUB BUILDING PROJECT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the above-referenced agreement is entered into on April 16, 2024, by and between LOC Architects (“Consultant”) and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS
A. The parties entered into Agreement No. A-2023-136, dated August 1, 2023 , by which Consultant agreed to p rovide professional architectural services for the Santa Ana Zoo Educational Hub Building Project (“Project”) for the City’s Public Works Agency (“Agreement”).

B. The Agreement is current and in-effect, and expires on July 31, 2026.

C. The parties now wish to amend the Scope of Services set forth in the Agreement to expand the overall size of the Project in order to accommodate the Zoo and community ’s needs, which requires the design of two buildings/structures (rather than one), with a gathering space in between the two buildings/structures. The parties further wish to increase the total not -to- exceed amount due under the Agreement to reflect this additional design concept. No other changes are contemplated by this First Amendment.

The Parties therefore agree:

1. Section 1, Scope of Services, is hereby amended to include the following language:

Furthermore, Consultant will provide an expanded scope of services for the proposed education hub at the Santa Ana Zoo to address the increased size of the project , as more particularly described in Consultant’s “Supplemental Services Authorization” and “Site Plan ,” which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A-1 and Exhibit B-1, respectively.

2. Section 2.a., Compensation , is amended to increase the not -to-exceed amount by an additional $123,400.00, for a total not-to-exceed amount under the Agreement of $508,520.00.

This sum is comprised of (1) a base amount of $473,520.00 and (2) a contingency in the amount of $35,000.00, for any additional and as -needed services to be exercised at the City’s sole discretion.

3. Except as modified by this First Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
[signatures on following page]
EXHIBIT 2

City Council
20 –
4 4/16/2024

SIGNATURE PAGE FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONSULTANT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND LOC ARCHITECTS TO PROVIDE

PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE SANTA ANA ZOO

EDUCATIONAL HUB BUILDING PROJECT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.

ATTEST CITY OF SANTA ANA

_______________________________ ______________________________ JENNIFER L. HALL TOM HATCH
City Clerk Interim City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM CONSULTANT
Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney

By:___________________________ _______________________________ JONATHAN T. MARTINEZ By:

Assistant City Attorney Title:

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

________________________________

NABIL SABA
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
Poonam Sharma
Principal, LOC

City Council
20 –
5 4/16/2024

LOC
453 S. Spring St. Ste.1126
Los Angeles, CA 90013
213.537.0480
www. loc-arch.com

S U P P L E M E N T A L S E R V I C E S A U T H O R I Z A T I O N March 12, 2024
City of Santa Ana
Gilbert Castillo
20 Civic Center Plaza
P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 93792-1988
2308.01 Expanded Project Scope
Dear Mr. Castillo
Per the Owner's request, we are providing this proposal to perform the following additional services:
• Provided an expanded scope of complete architectural services for the proposed education hub at the Santa Ana Zoo to address the increased size of the project • The project is now 8,300 SF in size, vs. 6,000 SF as indicated in the RFP (38% increase). The site area is now 15,000 SF in size, vs. 9,000 SF in the RFP (67% increase).

We propose to provide these additional services for fixed fee of One Hundred and Twenty-Three Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($123,400).

LOC INC. (Architectural) $49,800
KPFF (Structural) $34,000
KPFF (Civil) $30,000
Consultant Subtotal $64,000
LOC, INC. mark-up (15%) $9,600
Total $123,400
EXHIBIT A-1

City Council
20 –
6 4/16/2024

LOC
453 S. Spring St. Ste.1126
Los Angeles, CA 90013
213.537.0480
www. loc-arch.com
If this is acceptable to the City of Santa Ana and you would like us to proceed, please sign below and return to us.

Best Regards,
Ali Jeevanjee, Architect
Principal, LOC, INC.

For the City of Santa Ana
____________________________ ________________________
Signature Date Printed Name and Title

City Council
20 –
7 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT B-1
Edison Easement
Trees to be
protected
Trees to be
protected

City Council
20 –
8 4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 21
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Master Plan of Arterial Highways

AGENDA TITLE
Memorandum of Understanding for the Master Plan of Arterial Highways with the Orange County Transportation Authority and the City of Irvine

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a Memorandum of Understanding for the Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment with the Orange County Transportation Authority and the City of Irvine (Agreement No. A-2024-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
The Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) is the countywide roadway network for regional mobility managed by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), and cities must comply to qualify for M2 Funds. Coordination and consensus between the cities is required whenever changes to the MPAH are requested by any of local agencies that form part of the MPAH. The process described below was similarly followed by the City of Santa Ana (City) when an MPAH amendment was processed by the City back in June 2021 to reclassify several roadways in the City.

The City of Irvine has requested an amendment to the MPAH to reclassify Red Hill Avenue, between MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street, from a major six-lane to a primary four-lane arterial. The IBC Vision Plan 2018 Traffic Study Update Alternative Analysis (Exhibit 1), conducted as part of the MPAH amendment process, determined that the amendment to the MPAH would result in cumulative projected changes to future traffic patterns.

These projected changes in future traffic patterns result in a determination that appreciable impacts may occur at the intersections of Flower Street/MacArthur Boulevard and Flower Street/Segerstrom Avenue, both intersections which are located in the city. Improvements identified to mitigate appreciable impacts at the two intersections will be fully mitigated by adding an eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of Flower Street and MacArthur Boulevard and adding a westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Flower Street and Segerstrom Avenue which require right-of-way acquisition. It should be noted that the City will monitor the individual intersection performance and is only required to implement such improvements should the thresholds impacting the operations of the intersections be triggered.

City Council
21 –
1 4/16/2024

Master Plan of Arterial Highways
April 16, 2024

4 1
8 1
The City of Irvine shall provide the City a 1.1% fair share funding for Flower Street at Segerstrom Avenue and 1.0% fair share funding for Flower Street at MacArthur Boulevard. The projects will be programmed in the future Capital Improvement Program.

This MPAH amendment will require the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between OCTA and the Cities of Irvine and Santa Ana (Exhibit 2). All parties, the City of Irvine and Santa Ana, have agreed to these terms and conditions since there are traffic impacts to be coordinated between the two jurisdictions.

Staff recommends approving terms and conditions, and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a memorandum of understanding.

FISCAL IMPACT
There are two traffic operation improvements identified in the MOU within the City of Santa Ana. Implementation of these improvements require the traffic congestion to degrade to a certain threshold in the future. These locations will be monitored and, if the threshold is met, the projects will be programmed into a future CIP and funded accordingly. Project funding to be identified in the future will include grant funds, Transportation System Impact Area fees, and Irvine’s fair share. There is no fiscal impact at this time.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Traffic Study

2. Memorandum of Understanding
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director of Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
21 –
2 4/16/2024

Exhibit 1
IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
FINAL
June 2019
Submitted to:
10040 | Prepared by Iteris, Inc.

City Council
21 –
3 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction and Summary ...................................................................................................................................6 51 5 n/a
7 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................6 Alternative 1.................................................................................................................................................9 Alternative 2...............................................................................................................................................10

1.2 1.3

1.4 1.5
Traffic Impacts & Fair Share.......................................................................................................................10 7 n/aEstimated Costs of Alternatives .................................................................................................................12 83 Alternative 2 - Red Hill Avenue Widening (Main Street to MacArthur Boulevard).............................................55 8 8

3.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................55 Alternative 2 Daily Arterial Segment Analysis............................................................................................55 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Link Analysis........................................................................................................65 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Intersection Analysis...........................................................................................65 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Freeway Mainline Analysis .................................................................................74 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Freeway Ramp Analysis ......................................................................................76 Alternative 2 Future Improvements and Mitigations ................................................................................82

3.2 3.3

3.4 3.5

3.6 3.7
18 18
27 29
35 40
40 42
43 47
48 n/a
113
115
117
119
n/a
122
4 Cost Estimates.....................................................................................................................................................87

4.1 Cost Estimates for Mitigation Improvements............................................................................................87 References...........................................................................................................................................................91 Glossary of Transportation Terms.......................................................................................................................92 Appendices..........................................................................................................................................................96 Appendix A: ICU Worksheets ..................................................................................................................................96 Appendix B: HCS Mainline Analysis.........................................................................................................................97 Appendix C: HCS Ramp Analysis..............................................................................................................................98 Appendix D: Fair Share Analysis ..............................................................................................................................99 Appendix E: ICU Worksheet for Mitigation Intersection.......................................................................................100 Appendix F: Intersection Improvement List..........................................................................................................101 Appendix G: Alternative 1 Improvement Concept Plans and Cost Estimates .......................................................102 Appendix H: Alternative 2 Improvement Concept Plans and Cost Estimates .......................................................103 5 6
7 Iteris, Inc. | ii

City Council
21 –
4 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
TABLES
7 7
Table 1.3 - Number of Significantly Impacted Locations in the Study Area Under Alternative 2................................10 Table 1.4- Alternative 2 Improvement Strategies .......................................................................................................10 10 18
20 28
31 35
35 38
38 Table 3.1 –Alternative 2 Daily Arterial LOS..................................................................................................................57 Table 3.2 – Alternative 2 Peak Hour Link Analysis.......................................................................................................65 Table 3.3 – Alternative 2 Peak Hour Intersection LOS.................................................................................................67 Table 3.4 – Alternative 2 Freeway Peak Hour Mainline LOS .......................................................................................75 Table 3.5 – Alternative 2 Peak Hour Freeway Ramp LOS ............................................................................................78 Table 3.6 – Alternative 2 Number of Impacted Locations in the Study Area ..............................................................82 Table 3.7 –Alternative 2 Intersections Significantly Impacted in the Study Area .......................................................82 Table 3.8 – City of Santa Ana Intersection Improvements ..........................................................................................85 Table 3.9– Alternative 2 Freeway Ramp Plan Update Impacts and Fair-Share ...........................................................85 41Table 4.2 – Alternative 2 Cost of Improvements.........................................................................................................90 Iteris, Inc. | iii

City Council
21 –
5 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final

FIGURES
Figure 1.2 – Projects Removed From Road Network in Alternative 2 Scenario ............................................................8 6 16Figure 3.1 – Alternative 2 Daily Arterial ADT...............................................................................................................63 Figure 3.2 – Alternative 2 Daily Arterial Deficiencies ..................................................................................................64 Figure 3.3 – Alternative 2 AM Peak Hour Intersection Deficiencies............................................................................72 Figure 3.4 – Alternative 2 PM Peak Hour Intersection Deficiencies............................................................................73 Figure 3.5 – Alternative 2 Freeway AM Peak Hour Deficiencies .................................................................................80 Figure 3.6 – Alternative 2 Freeway PM Peak Hour Deficiencies..................................................................................81 Figure 3.7 – Alternative 2 IBC Vision Study Area Improvement Locations..................................................................84 17 25
26 33
34 37
Iteris, Inc. | v

City Council
21 –
6 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY

1.1 Introduction
This 2018 IBC Vision Plan Two-Year Traffic Study Update (2018 Update) evaluates potential traffic impact locations and documents how development actually occurred over the past two years. The update takes a “snapshot” of the development activity today and considers ambient regional growth to compare with the 2010 and 2015 assumptions. If as a result of actual development, the original traffic impacts are altered or changed, the City has the ability to revise the list of traffic mitigations and IBC fees accordingly within the umbrella of the adopted Vision Plan.

Six alternative land use scenarios are tested in the 2018 IBC Vision Plan Two-Year Traffic Study Update (2018 Update). This supplemental report includes additional analysis for two alternative scenarios in the Buildout condition to test the removal of future highway network improvements. The study area defined in the 2018 Update is also used for this report. The following two scenarios were analyzed:
 Alternative 2 – Reflects updated Vision Plan assumptions anticipated to be constructed by Buildout but with the removal of the MPAH widening of Red Hill Avenue from four to six lanes between MacArthur Blvd and Main Street which is currently assumed in the Buildout scenario. Alternative 2 is compared to the Buildout with Update scenario.

The location of these two improvements is illustrated in Figure 1.1 and Figure 1.2.

For both the Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 scenarios, land use is assumed to be the same as Buildout Cumulative Baseline With Update scenario, however, the land use assumptions in the comparison scenario used for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are different. Alternative 1 tests the land uses associated with the Vision Plan Update as well as the removal of both highway network improvements while Alternative 2 tests only the removal of the single network improvement and no land use changes.

A summary of the analysis, list of deficient locations and improvements is provided in the following sections.

Detailed analysis of Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 are discussed in Chapter 2 and Chapter 3, respectively.

Iteris, Inc. | 6

City Council
21 –
7 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Figure 1.2 – Projects Removed From Road Network in Alternative 2 Scenario Iteris, Inc. | 8

City Council
21 –
8 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final

1.3 Alternative 2
Alternative 2 tests the removal of the MPAH widening of Red Hill Avenue from four to six lanes between MacArthur Blvd and Main Street. Unlike Alternative 1, the land use scenarios are the same for the Alternative 2 and No Alternative (Buildout with Update) scenarios, which explains why Alternative 2 generates considerably fewer impacts than Alternative 1 as shown in Table 1.3. Alternative 2 generates only two intersection impacts: Flower Street/Segerstrom Avenue in the City of Santa Ana and Flower Street/MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Costa Mesa. The improvement strategies at these locations are shown in Table 1.4
Table 1.3 - Number of Significantly Impacted Locations in the Study Area Under Alternative 2

FACILITY
Arterial Segments
Intersections
Freeway Mainline
Freeway Ramps
Total
ALTERNATIVE 2
0 2
0 1
2 Table 1.4- Alternative 2 Improvement Strategies
INTERSECTION ID # INTERSECTION NAME JURISDICTION IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY ALTERNATIVE 2 IMPACTS AND CUMULATIVE DEFICIENCIES
720
719
Flower Street at MacArthur Boulevard
Flower Street at Segerstrom Avenue
Costa Mesa
Santa Ana
Add EBR
Add WBR

1.4 Traffic Impacts & Fair Share
A fair-share methodology was used to evaluate the financial participation of mitigating IBC Vision impacts.

The following methodology is applied:


For impacts within the City of Irvine, the IBC Vision Plan is fully responsible.

For impacts outside the City of Irvine, the IBC Vision Plan would participate on a fair-share basis.

Alternative 2 tests the removal of the proposed MPAH widening of Red Hill Avenue from four to six lanes between Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard. Both the No Project and With Project scenarios use the same With IBC Vision Plan land use assumptions. Alternative 2 is therefore a test of removal of this improvement from the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). For any improvements identified under this scenario, the City of Irvine is responsible for the full cost of mitigation within the City of Irvine and for a fair share basis for improvements outside the City of Irvine.

All impacts referenced in this study update represent impacts as defined in the City of Irvine’s Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, adopted August 2004, or for locations outside Irvine, per the performance criteria for each affected agency.

Iteris, Inc. | 10

City Council
21 –
9 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
3 ALTERNATIVE 2 - RED HILL AVENUE WIDENING (MAIN

STREET TO MACARTHUR BOULEVARD)

3.1 Introduction
The 2018 Traffic Study Update Alternative 2 is an analysis to observe the impacts of removing the one remaining MPAH roadway network project within the IBC area; the widening of Red Hill Avenue from four to six lanes between Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard. The location of this project is illustrated in Figure

1.2. For this analysis, the Buildout Cumulative With Update is assumed to be the No Project (Baseline) scenario and the Alternative 2 scenario is the With Project scenario. Traffic analysis is performed using the same methodology employed for the Interim and Buildout year analysis. Any forecast deficiency locations are identified, together with identification of the most effective improvement measures to mitigate them.

The transportation networks are consistent between these two future scenarios except for one exception, the Alternative 2 scenario removes the Red Hill Avenue widening project currently in the MPAH that would widen the arterial to six lanes between Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard. The Alternative 2 scenario assumes Red Hill Avenue in the project area to have the same configuration as existing conditions.

In order to isolate the effects of removing the Red Hill widening to traffic patterns in the study area, the Alternative 2 scenario has the identical land-use as Buildout With Update.

3.2 Alternative 2 Daily Arterial Segment Analysis
The Alternative 2 traffic patterns generally remain very similar to the Buildout With Update scenario traffic patterns. The vast majority of road segments see the same traffic volume in both scenarios. Because the Alternative 2 roadway network does not include the Red Hill Widening project, the largest difference in traffic volume between the two scenarios occurs on Red Hill Avenue. Most notably, ADT on Red Hill Avenue between McGaw Avenue and Sky Park decreases by 1,200 vehicles in Alternative 2 compared to the Buildout Cumulative With Update scenario. The list of arterial segments that are deficient in the Alternative 2 scenario are identical to those of the Buildout Cumulative With Update scenario.

Deficient segments under daily Alternative 2 conditions are shown in Table 3.1 and are:


Campus Drive:
o 879—Campus Drive from Carlson Avenue to University Drive (Irvine) Culver Drive:
o
o
o
o
o
o
726—Culver Drive from I-5 NB Ramps to I-5 SB Ramps (Irvine) 213—Culver Drive from I-5 SB Ramps to Scottsdale Drive (Irvine) 214—Culver Drive from Scottsdale Drive to Walnut Avenue (Irvine) 215—Culver Drive from Walnut Avenue to Deerfield Avenue(Irvine) 217—Culver Drive from Irvine Center Drive to Warner Avenue (Irvine) 219—Culver Drive from Barranca Parkway to Alton Parkway (Irvine) Iteris, Inc. | 55

City Council
21 –
10 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
o
o
o
o
220—Culver Drive from Alton Parkway to Main Street (Irvine) 221—Culver Drive from Main Street to San Leandro (Irvine) 222—Culver Drive from San Leandro to I-405 NB On-Ramp (Irvine) 224—Culver Drive from I-405 SB On-Ramp to Michelson Drive (Irvine) 

Harvard Avenue:
o
Jamboree Road:
183—Harvard Avenue from Michelson Drive to University Drive (Irvine) o
o
o
o
133—Jamboree Road from Michelle Drive to Walnut Avenue (Irvine) 144—Jamboree Road from Kelvin Avenue to Main Street (Irvine) 148—Jamboree Road from I-405 SB Ramps to Michelson Drive (Irvine) 149—Jamboree Road from Michelson Drive to Dupont Drive (Irvine)  Von Karman Avenue:
o
o
o
o
98—Von Karman Avenue from Barranca parkway to Alton Parkway (Irvine) 100—Von Karman Avenue from Alton Parkway to McGaw Avenue (Irvine) 102—Von Karman Avenue from McGaw Avenue to Anchor(Irvine) 103—Von Karman Avenue from Anchor to Main Street (Irvine) 

Bristol Street:
o
o
o
920—Bristol Street SB Red Hill Avenue to Campus Drive (Newport Beach)* 1303—Bristol Street SB from Campus Drive to Birch Street (Newport Beach)* 1305—Bristol Street NB from Birch Street to Campus Drive (Newport Beach)* MacArthur Boulevard:
o
o
953—MacArthur Boulevard from University Drive to Bison Avenue (Newport Beach)* 1301—MacArthur Boulevard from Bison Avenue to Ford Road (Newport Beach)* 

Dyer Road:
o
Walnut Avenue:
1326—Dyer Road from SR-55 SB Ramp to SR-55 NB Ramp (Santa Ana)* o 587—Walnut Avenue East of Newport Avenue (Tustin)*
*Deficient locations under daily conditions—no peak hour link analysis required.

Figure 3.1 and Figure 3.2 display the arterial ADT and deficient segments for the Alternative 2 scenario.

Deficient segments in the City of Irvine are evaluated under peak hour conditions in the following section. For Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, and Tustin, arterial segment deficiencies are addressed through intersection improvements. For Santa Ana, deficient segments under daily conditions are typically improved to operate at an acceptable LOS. Impacts and improvements are discussed in Section 3.7.

Iteris, Inc. | 56

City Council
21 –
11 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Table 3.1 –Alternative 2 Daily Arterial LOS
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2WITH UPDATE

ID ARTERIAL SEGMENT LIMITS
2725 Anton Blvd
2721 Baker St
2729 Baker St
1294 Baker St
1468 Baker St
Bristol St to Sunflower Ave
Bear St to Bristol St
Bristol St to SR 55 SB Ramps
SR 55 SB to SR 55 NB
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
Irv
4D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
9D+1 AUX
8D
6D
6D
6D
6D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
6D
2U
2U
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
8D
7D
7D
7D
21,700 0.57

0.53 0.60

0.46 0.26

0.09 0.55

0.73 0.81

0.80 0.84

0.78 0.87

0.80 0.65

0.48 0.36

0.63 0.33

0.36 0.28

0.17 0.47

0.49 0.49

0.38 0.24

0.52 0.46

0.34 0.15

0.55 0.51

0.46 0.24

0.33 0.94

0.70 0.70

0.48 0.46

0.35 0.38

0.51 0.61

0.77 0.74

0.79 A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
D
C
D
C
D
C
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
E
21,600 0.57

0.52 0.60

0.46 0.26

0.09 0.55

0.73 0.81

0.80 0.84

0.78 0.87

0.81 0.65

0.48 0.36

0.63 0.33

0.36 0.28

0.17 0.47

0.49 0.49

0.38 0.24

0.52 0.45

0.34 0.15

0.54 0.50

0.45 0.24

0.33 0.94

0.70 0.70

0.48 0.46

0.35 0.38

0.51 0.61

0.77 0.74

0.79 A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
D
C
D
C
D
D
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
E
29,500
33,500
26,000
14,600
5,000
29,400
33,400
25,900
14,500
5,000
SR 55 NB to Red Hill Ave
1469 Baker St
2723 Bear St
Red Hill Ave to Airway Ave
Paularino Ave to Baker St
Segerstrom Ave to West Alton Ave
West Alton Ave to MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to Sunflower Ave
Sunflower Ave to Anton Blvd
Anton Blvd to I-405 NB Ramps
I-405 NB Ramps to I-405 SB Ramps
I-405 SB Ramps to Paularino Ave
Paularino Ave to Baker St
Baker St to SR 55
30,900
41,000
45,600
44,800
46,800
66,100
65,100
45,000
36,500
26,700
20,400
24,100
12,500
13,800
10,700
6,400
26,500
6,100
6,100
14,300
9,300
19,700
17,300
13,100
5,700
31,000
41,000
45,600
44,900
46,800
66,100
65,100
45,200
36,500
26,800
20,400
24,100
12,500
13,800
10,700
6,500
26,100
6,100
6,100
14,300
9,200
19,700
17,200
13,000
5,800
2733 Bristol St
2737 Bristol St
2738 Bristol St
2727 Bristol St
2728 Bristol St
2751 Bristol St
2745 Bristol St
2732 Bristol St
2730 Bristol St
1888 Bristol St
2793 Del Mar Ave
2791 Del Mar Ave
2772 Flower St
2804 Flower St
2760 Flower St
2756 Main St
2785 Mesa Drive
2783 Mesa Drive
2779 Mesa Drive
2742 Paularino Ave
2746 Paularino Ave
1291 Paularino Ave
1344 Paularino Ave
1342 Paularino Ave
SR-55 to Red Hill Ave
Newport Blvd SB to Newport Blvd NB
Newport Blvd to Santa Ana Ave
Segerstrom Ave to MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to Sunflower Ave
Sunflower Ave to Anton Blvd
Sunflower Ave to SR-55
Newport Blvd SB to Newport Blvd NB
Newport Blvd NB to Santa Ana Ave
Irvine Ave to Birch St
Bear St to Bristol St
Bristol St to SR-55 SB
SR-55 SB to SR-55 NB
SR-55 NB to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Airway Ave
Main St to Paularino Ave
Paularino Ave to Baker St
Baker St to Bristol St
39 Red Hill Ave a 21,000
19,300
17,300
9,200
20,600
18,900
17,200
9,200
1340 Red Hill Ave
40 41
Red Hill Ave
Santa Ana Ave Mesa Drive to Bristol St
2769 University Drive Santa Ana Ave to Irvine Ave
Daimler St to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave to Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd to Murphy Ave
Murphy Ave to Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave to Paseo Westpark
Paseo Westpark to San Marino
San Marino to Culver Drive
12,400
30,000
22,300
22,300
25,800
24,800
19,000
20,500
27,800
43,800
48,700
46,600
50,000
12,400
30,100
22,300
22,300
25,700
24,800
18,900
20,500
27,800
43,900
48,600
46,500
49,900
770
776
778
779
780
781
Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy
a
a
a
a
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
C
C
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
C
C
1378 Alton Pkwy
783
735
736
739
740
Alton Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy (Dyer Rd) Pullman to Red Hill Ave
Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy
Red Hill Ave to Armstrong
Armstrong to Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave to Jamboree Rd
a
a
a
Irv
Irv
Irv
Iteris, Inc. | 57

City Council
21 –
12 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2WITH UPDATE

ID ARTERIAL SEGMENT LIMITS
743 Barranca Pkwy Jamboree Rd to Construction Circle
Construction Circle to Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave to Paseo Westpark
Paseo Westpark to Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa to Culver Drive
Jamboree Rd to Marketplace
Marketplace to El Camino Real
El Camino Real to Rubicon
a
a
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
4D
4D
4D
4D
6U
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
35,400 0.66

0.53 0.50

0.57 0.57

0.72 0.72

0.70 0.78

0.30 0.51

0.48 0.49

0.82 0.92

0.31 0.96

1.10 0.98

0.92 0.79

0.92 0.89

1.03 0.97

0.97 1.01

1.08 0.80

0.73 0.76

0.20 0.39

0.46 0.46

0.41 0.51

0.56 0.64

0.60 0.63

0.69 0.84

0.84 0.85

1.65 0.57

0.64 0.67

0.98 B
A
A
A
A
C
C
B
C
A
A
A
A
D
E
A
E
F
E
E
C
E
D
F
E
E
35,300 0.65

0.52 0.50

0.57 0.57

0.72 0.72

0.70 0.78

0.30 0.51

0.48 0.49

0.82 0.92

0.31 0.96

1.10 0.98

0.92 0.79

0.92 0.89

1.03 0.97

0.97 1.02

1.08 0.80

0.73 0.76

0.20 0.39

0.46 0.46

0.41 0.51

0.56 0.64

0.60 0.63

0.69 0.84

0.84 0.85

1.65 0.57

0.64 0.67

0.98 B
A
A
A
A
C
C
B
C
A
A
A
A
D
E
A
E
F
E
E
C
E
D
F
E
E
744
745
747
748
538
Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pky
Bryan Ave
28,400
27,200
31,000
30,800
23,200
23,100
22,300
25,100
16,400
16,300
15,500
15,700
26,300
29,400
10,000
60,600
59,300
52,700
49,600
46,500
49,600
47,800
55,400
52,500
52,600
54,800
58,200
43,000
39,200
24,200
6,500
10,900
12,900
13,000
13,100
16,300
18,000
20,600
19,100
20,100
22,200
27,000
27,000
27,200
21,500
30,700
34,600
48,500
66,300
28,300
27,100
31,000
30,800
23,200
23,100
22,300
25,100
16,400
16,400
15,500
15,700
26,300
29,400
10,000
60,600
59,300
52,700
49,600
46,400
49,600
47,800
55,400
52,600
52,600
54,900
58,200
43,000
39,200
24,200
6,500
10,900
12,900
13,000
13,100
16,200
18,000
20,600
19,100
20,100
22,200
27,000
27,000
27,200
21,500
30,700
34,700
48,500
66,300
1812 Bryan Ave
539
540
869
870
871
872
877
879
166
726
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
224
225
226
Bryan Ave
Bryan Ave Rubicon to Culver
MacArthur Blvd to MartinCampus Drive
Campus Drive
Campus Drive
Campus Drive
Campus Drive
Campus Drive
Carlson Ave
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
Culver Drive
a
a
a
a
a
Martin to Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave to Teller Ave
Teller Ave to Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd to Carlson Ave
Carlson Ave to University
Michelson Drive to Campus Drive
I-5 NB Ramps to I-5 SB Ramps
I-5 SB Ramps to Scottsdale Drive
Scottsdale Drive to Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave to Deerfield Ave
Deerfield Ave to Irvine Center Drive
Irvine Center Drive to Warner Ave
Warner Ave to Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy to Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy to Main St
a
7D
6D
6D
6D
Maj6D+ 1AUX
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
4D
4D
4U
4U
4U
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
2U
6D
6D
8D
Main St to San Leandro
San Leandro to I-405 NB On-Ramp
I-405 SB Ramps to Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive to Sandburg Way
Sandburg Way to University Drive
Jamboree Rd to Alliance
MacArthur Blvd to Jamboree Rd
Walnut Ave to Poplar St
Poplar St to Deerfield Ave
Deerfield Ave to Irvine Center Drive
Irvine Center Drive to Paseo Westpark
Paseo Westpark to Warner Ave
Warner to Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy to San Juan
San Juan to San Leon
San Leon to Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy to San Marino
San Marino to Main St
Main St to Coronado
Coronado to Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive to University Drive
Harvard Ave to Hearthstone
Hearthstone to Culver Drive
Bryan Ave to El Camino
F
F
F
F
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
B
B
D
D
D
F
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
B
B
D
D
D
F
1206 El Camino Real
169
170
Fairchild Rd
Harvard Ave
3040 Harvard Ave
171
172
174
175
177
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
2829 Harvard Ave
178
179
180
181
182
183
675
676
129
130
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave
Irvine Center Drive
Irvine Center Drive
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
b
b
b
b
A
B
B
E
A
B
B
EEl Camino Real to I-5 NB Ramps Maj7D+ 1AUX
Iteris, Inc. | 58

City Council
21 –
13 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2WITH UPDATE

ID ARTERIAL SEGMENT LIMITS
958 Jamboree Rd I-5 NB Ramps to I-5 SB Ramps
I-5 SB Ramps to Michelle Drive
Michelle Drive to Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave to Edinger Ave (& Frontage Rd)
Edinger Ave to Warner Ave
Warner Ave to Barranca Pkwy
Barranca Pkwy to Beckman Ave
Beckman Ave to Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy to McGaw Ave
McGaw Ave to Kelvin Ave
b
b
b
b
b
a,b
a,b
a,b
a,b
a,b
a,b
b
a,b
a,b
a,b
b
b
b
a,b
a
a
a
a
a
a
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
8D
8D
5D
Exp8
Exp8
Exp8
8D
8D
62,600 0.87

0.80 1.69

0.47 0.48

0.37 0.81

0.88 0.93

0.86 1.04

0.99 1.13

1.03 0.84

0.94 0.78

0.68 0.80

0.58 0.45

0.45 0.75

0.90 0.68

0.66 0.99

0.99 0.51

0.52 0.49

0.52 0.65

0.52 0.49

0.41 0.45

0.41 0.41

0.25 0.39

0.33 0.10

0.56 0.50

0.75 0.55

0.72 0.77

0.79 D
C
F
A
A
A
D
D
E
D
F
E
F
F
62,500 0.87

0.80 1.69

0.47 0.48

0.37 0.81

0.88 0.93

0.86 1.04

0.99 1.13

1.03 0.84

0.94 0.78

0.68 0.80

0.59 0.45

0.45 0.75

0.90 0.68

0.66 0.99

0.99 0.51

0.52 0.49

0.52 0.65

0.52 0.49

0.41 0.46

0.41 0.41

0.25 0.39

0.33 0.10

0.56 0.51

0.75 0.55

0.72 0.77

0.79 D
C
F
A
A
A
D
D
E
D
F
E
F
F
131
133
135
136
137
138
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
57,900
72,600
84,900
85,800
66,700
58,500
63,600
66,800
62,000
74,700
80,400
91,900
65,200
53,100
50,900
49,200
43,100
43,200
36,700
28,400
28,100
60,800
68,600
49,200
47,200
53,500
53,300
27,700
27,900
26,500
35,200
38,000
28,200
26,700
24,200
24,500
13,100
13,200
7,900
57,900
72,700
84,900
85,800
66,700
58,500
63,500
66,800
62,000
74,700
80,400
91,900
65,100
53,000
50,900
49,100
43,100
43,200
37,100
28,400
28,100
61,000
68,700
49,300
47,300
53,500
53,300
27,500
28,200
26,700
35,300
38,100
28,200
26,700
24,200
24,600
13,100
13,200
7,900
1503 Jamboree Rd
140
142
144
145
148
149
150
151
152
154
155
814
815
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
8D
8D
8DKelvin Ave to Main St
Main St to I-405 NB Ramps
I-405 SB Ramps to Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive to Dupont Drive
Dupont Drive to Campus Drive
Campus Drive to Birch St
Maj8D+ 2AUX
Maj8D+ 2AUX
7D
7D
6D
7D
7D
6D
7D
7D
D
E
D
E
Birch St to Fairchild Rd C
B
C
A
A
A
C
D
B
B
E
C
B
C
A
A
A
C
D
B
B
E
Fairchild Rd to Koll Center
Koll Center to MacArthur Blvd
Fitch to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Skypark Blvd
Skypark Blvd to Main St1524 MacArthur Blvd
60 62
63 7D
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St
Main St to I-405 NB Ramps
I-405 SB Ramps to Michelson Dr
Michelson Drive to Douglass
Douglas to Campus Drive
Jamboree Rd to Fairchild Rd
Fairchild Rd to University Drive
McDurmott to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Executive Park
Executive Park to MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to Mercantile
Gillette Ave to Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave to Cartwright
Siglo to Jamboree Rd
Maj8D+ 2AUX
Maj8D+ 1AUX
8D
8D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
64 916
917
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
a,b
b
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
E E
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
C
C
C
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
C
C
C
Maj7D+ 1AUX
Maj6D+ 1AUX
6D
6D
Jamboree Rd to Union
Veneto to Harvard Ave
a Maj6D+ 1AUX
6D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
5D
4D
Harvard Ave to San Mateo
Paseo Westpark to Culver Drive
Daimler St to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave to Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd to Murphy Ave
MacArthur Blvd to Dupont Drive
Bixby to Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave to Obsidian
Teller Ave to Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd to Carlson Ave
Carlson Ave to Prince
1507 McGaw Ave
808
810
a
a
a
McGaw Ave
McGaw Ave
12,600
10,600
3,200
24,200
16,100
27,100
23,800
28,700
27,800
25,400
12,500
10,600
3,200
24,200
16,200
27,100
23,800
28,700
27,800
25,400
1449 McGaw Ave
840
843
844
845
846
847
848
Michelson Drive a
a
a
a
a
Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive
Prim4D+ 1AUX
5D
Prim4D+ 2AUX
Prim4D+ 1AUX
4DRiparian View to Harvard Ave
Iteris, Inc. | 59

City Council
21 –
14 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2WITH UPDATE

ID ARTERIAL SEGMENT LIMITS
1346 Michelson Drive Harvard Ave to Parkside Drive
Parkside Drive to Culver Drive
Dyer/Barranca Pkwy to Deere Ave
Deere Ave to Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy to McGaw Ave
McGaw Ave to MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to Sky Park
Sky Park to Main St
MacArthur Blvd to California Ave
California Ave to Mesa Rd
Mesa Rd to Campus Drive
Campus Drive to Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave to San Joaquin Hills Rd
San Joaquin Hills Rd to Culver Drive
Barranca Pkwy to Alton Pkwy
Alton Pkwy to McGaw Ave
McGaw Ave to Anchor
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
4D
4D
6D
6D
6D
6D
4D
4D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
4D
4D
19,400 0.61

0.61 0.69

0.70 0.67

0.85 0.70

0.55 0.65

0.70 0.71

0.63 0.59

0.58 1.30

1.13 1.02

1.03 0.94

1.00 0.81

0.78 0.77

0.66 0.36

0.45 0.61

0.63 0.56

0.42 0.43

0.57 0.68

0.40 0.58

0.26 0.11

0.34 1.84

0.58 0.91

1.07 0.88

0.59 0.64

0.24 0.56

0.44 0.76

0.62 B
B
B
B
B
D
B
A
B
B
C
B
A
A
F
19,400 0.61

0.61 0.69

0.69 0.67

0.84 0.65

0.52 0.65

0.70 0.71

0.63 0.59

0.58 1.30

1.13 1.02

1.04 0.94

1.00 0.81

0.78 0.77

0.66 0.36

0.45 0.61

0.63 0.56

0.42 0.42

0.57 0.68

0.40 0.58

0.26 0.11

0.34 1.84

0.58 0.92

1.07 0.88

0.59 0.64

0.24 0.56

0.44 0.76

0.62 B
B
B
B
B
D
B
A
B
B
C
B
A
A
F
850
31 Michelson Drive
Red Hill Ave
19,500
37,500
37,600
36,400
45,700
22,300
17,700
35,300
37,600
38,100
34,000
31,700
31,500
41,700
36,100
32,700
33,100
33,700
36,100
25,900
25,100
24,600
23,800
21,300
21,300
19,500
20,100
17,900
13,500
13,700
22,900
27,100
15,900
23,300
10,200
6,100
19,500
37,400
37,500
36,000
45,200
20,800
16,500
35,300
37,700
38,100
34,000
31,700
31,500
41,600
36,100
32,700
33,200
33,700
36,100
25,900
25,100
24,600
23,800
21,300
21,300
19,500
20,100
17,900
13,500
13,600
22,900
27,100
15,800
23,300
10,200
6,100
a
a
a
a
a
a
32 Red Hill Ave
33 Red Hill Ave
36 Red Hill Ave
37 Red Hill Ave
38 Red Hill Ave
189
188
187
880
881
882
98 100
102
103
104
107
108
110
111
594
593
595
596
597
728
729
732
University Drive
University Drive
University Drive
University Drive
University Drive
University Drive
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
Warner Ave
Warner Ave
Warner Ave
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
F
F
F
E
F
F
F
E
4D
4DAnchor to Main St
Main St to Morse Ave
Quartz to Michelson Drive
Michelson Diver to Dupont Drive
Dupont Drive to Martin
Prim4D+ 1AUX
Prim4D+ 1AUX E E
4D
4D
4D
D
C
C
B
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
F
D
C
C
B
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
F
Martin to Campus Drive
Myford to Jamboree SB Ramp
Jamboree Rd to Peters Canyon
Peters Canyon to Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave to Mall St
Prim4D+ 1AUX
Maj6D+ 1AUX
Prim5D+ 1AUX
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4D
6D
4D
2D
3D
3D
3D
4D
3D
6D
4D
6D
6D
4D
6D
Mall St to Culver Drive
Construction N to Harvard Ave
Harvard Ave to Paseo Westpark
Santa Ynez to Culver Drive
Mesa Drive to Bristol St SB
Bristol St SB to Bristol St NB
East of MacArthur Blvd
1223 Birch St
1314 Birch St
874
69 875
Birch St
Birch St
Birch St
West of MacArthur Blvd
East of Von Karman Ave
1705 Bison Ave
1773 Bison Ave
Jamboree Rd to MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to SR-73
Red Hill Ave to Campus Drive
Campus Drive to Red Hill Ave
Campus Drive to Birch St
Birch St to Campus Drive
West of Jamboree Rd
13,600
33,100
16,900
26,500
31,100
35,400
17,000
37,300
9,500
32,300
25,800
30,200
36,000
13,500
33,100
16,900
26,600
31,100
35,400
17,000
37,300
9,500
32,300
25,800
30,200
36,000
920 Bristol St SB
1310 Bristol St NB
1303 Bristol St SB
1305 Bristol St NB
1312 Bristol St SB
1580 Bristol St NB
A
E
F
A
E
F
D
A
B
A
A
A
C
B
D
A
B
A
A
A
C
B
West of Jamboree Rd
66 Campus Drive Bristol St NB to MacArthur Blvd
Jamboree Rd to MacArthur Blvd
Bristol St NB to Bristol St SB
Bristol St SB to Mesa Drive
S of University Drive
1778 Ford Rd
1304 Irvine Ave
67 2768 Irvine Ave
156 Jamboree Rd
Irvine Ave
S of MacArthur Blvd
Iteris, Inc. | 60

City Council
21 –
15 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2WITH UPDATE

ID ARTERIAL SEGMENT LIMITS
1856 Jamboree Rd Bristol St SB to Bristol St NB
S of Bristol St
University Drive to Bison Ave
Bison Ave to Ford Rd
Campus Drive to Birch St
S of Birch St
Von Karman Ave to Jamboree Rd
University Drive to Bison Ave
Bison Ave to Ford Rd
East of Irvine Ave
Jamboree Rd to MacArthur Blvd
S of Campus Drive
S of Birch St
Main St to Halladay St
Halladay St to SR-55 SB
SR-55 SB to SR-55 NB
SR-55 NB to Pullman St
Warner Ave to Hotel Terrace Drive
Hotel Terrace Drive to SR-55 NB
Dyer Rd to Alton Ave
Alton Ave to McGaw Ave(Columbine)
Flower St to Main St
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA/CM
SA/CM
SA/CM
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
6D
8D
6D
6D
8D
6D
6D
6D
8D
2U
5D
4D
4D
6D
6D
6D
8D
6D
6D
4D
2U
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
4U
4D
4D
6D
6D
6D
6D
2U
4U
4D
4D
4D
6D
6D
6D
4D
4D
4D
4D
6D
42,900 0.74

0.66 0.72

0.56 0.37

0.40 0.40

1.23 1.17

0.52 0.28

0.45 0.37

0.61 0.67

1.06 0.83

0.51 0.51

0.25 0.28

0.74 0.67

0.61 0.51

0.53 0.40

0.49 0.74

0.77 0.45

0.40 0.37

0.49 0.52

0.72 0.48

0.49 0.61

0.96 0.63

0.57 0.38

0.25 0.29

0.52 0.56
C
B
C
A
A
A
A
F
42,900 0.74

0.66 0.72

0.56 0.37

0.40 0.40

1.23 1.17

0.52 0.28

0.45 0.37

0.61 0.67

1.06 0.83

0.51 0.51

0.25 0.29

0.75 0.67

0.61 0.51

0.53 0.40

0.49 0.74

0.77 0.45

0.40 0.37

0.48 0.52

0.73 0.48

0.49 0.61

0.96 0.63

0.57 0.38

0.25 0.29

0.52 0.56
C
B
C
A
A
A
A
F
157
159
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd
45,100
42,000
32,200
25,400
23,000
23,100
71,200
79,400
5,200
13,900
18,000
14,900
34,200
37,700
59,900
61,900
28,700
28,500
9,200
45,100
42,000
32,200
25,400
23,000
23,100
71,300
79,500
5,200
13,900
18,000
14,900
34,200
37,700
59,900
61,900
28,700
28,500
9,200
1777 Jamboree Rd
73 75
914
953
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd b
b1301 MacArthur Blvd
2767 University Drive
1774 University Drive
F F
A
A
A
A
B
B
F
A
A
A
A
B
B
F
112
113
Von Karman Ave
Von Karman Ave
2795 Dyer Rd
2799 Dyer Rd
1326 Dyer Rd
734 Dyer Rd D
A
A
A
A
C
B
B
A
A
A
A
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
B
E
D
A
A
A
A
C
B
B
A
A
A
A
C
C
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
B
E
2764 Grand Ave
2806 Grand Ave
2800 Halladay St
2822 Halladay St
2805 MacArthur Blvd
1884 MacArthur Blvd
2796 Main St
2826 Main St
2809 Main St
2811 Main St
2823 McGaw Ave (Alton)
2736 Segerstrom Ave
2771 Segerstrom Ave
2763 Warner Ave
2761 Sunflower Ave
2759 Sunflower Ave
2757 Sunflower Ave
1198 Browning Ave
3,500 3,600
41,800
38,000
34,300
28,600
29,900
22,400
11,700
27,600
29,000
25,300
22,400
20,900
27,400
6,500
18,100
18,000
18,500
22,700
53,800
35,500
32,000
14,300
9,300
42,000
38,000
34,400
28,700
30,000
22,600
11,800
27,600
29,000
25,400
22,300
20,800
27,100
6,500
18,200
18,000
18,500
22,700
53,800
35,500
32,000
14,300
9,300
Main St to SR-55 SB
Segerstrom Ave to Alton Ave
Alton Ave to McGaw Ave(Columbine)
McGaw(Columbine) to MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to Sunflower Ave
Main St to Halladay St
Bristol St to Flower St
Flower St to Main St
Grand Ave to SR-55
Bristol St to Flower St
Flower St to Anton Blvd
Anton Blvd to Main St
Walnut Ave to I-5
534
535
536
537
44 Bryan Ave
Bryan Ave
Bryan Ave
Bryan Ave
Edinger Ave
Edinger Ave
Edinger Ave
Newport Blvd to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Browning
Browning Ave to Tustin Ranch Rd
Tustin Ranch Rd to Jamboree Rd
West of Newport Ave
Newport Ave to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave and Tustin Ranch Rd
Newport Ave to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Browning Ave
Browning Ave to Tustin Ranch Rd
Tustin Ranch Rd to Jamboree Rd
b
b
b
663
665
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
1202 El Camino Real
938 El Camino Real
1740 El Camino Real
1205 El Camino Real
Irvine Center Drive
10,700
19,500
31,600
10,700
19,600
31,600672 Tustin Ranch Rd to Jamboree Rd b
b
Tus(Edinger)
674 Irvine Center Drive Jamboree Rd to Harvard Ave
Newport Ave to Red Hill Ave
Tus
Tus
6D
2U
30,600
7,400

0.54 0.59
A
A
30,600
7,400

0.54 0.59
A
A2777 Mitchell Ave
Iteris, Inc. | 61

City Council
21 –
16 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE ALTERNATIVE 2WITH UPDATE

ID ARTERIAL SEGMENT LIMITS
2775 Mitchell Ave Red Hill Ave to Browning Ave
El Camino Real to I-5
I-5 to Mitchell Ave
Mitchell Ave to McFadden Ave
N of Sycamore Ave
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
2U
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
2U
2U
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
7D
4D
4D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
4D
4D
4D
4D
4U
4D
4D
4D
6D
5,800 0.46

0.89 0.75

0.70 0.41

0.55 0.46

0.54 0.68

0.64 0.76

0.56 0.54

0.54 0.60

0.66 0.68

0.67 0.23

0.27 0.79

0.81 0.58

0.60 0.74

0.53 0.28

0.48 0.31

0.33 0.92

0.52 0.61

0.57 0.40
A
D
C
B
A
A
A
A
B
B
C
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
A
C
D
A
A
C
A
A
A
A
A
E
5,800 0.46

0.89 0.75

0.70 0.41

0.55 0.46

0.54 0.68

0.64 0.76

0.56 0.54

0.54 0.60

0.66 0.68

0.66 0.23

0.27 0.79

0.81 0.58

0.60 0.74

0.53 0.28

0.48 0.31

0.33 0.92

0.51 0.61

0.57 0.40
A
D
C
B
A
A
A
A
B
B
C
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
A
A
C
D
A
A
C
A
A
A
A
A
E
6 7
48 49
Newport Ave
Newport Ave
Newport Ave
Newport Ave
50,200
42,200
39,400
23,200
31,000
5,800
50,200
42,100
39,300
23,100
31,000
5,800
1585 Newport Ave
1351 Nisson Rd
Valencia Ave to Edinger Ave
Newport Ave to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave to Browning Ave
I-5 NB Ramps to El Camino Real
I-5 SB Ramps to I-5 NB Ramps
Nisson Rd to I-5 SB Ramps
Nisson Rd to Mitchell Ave
Mitchell Ave to Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave to Sycamore Ave
Sycamore Ave to Edinger Ave
Edinger Ave to Valencia Ave
Valencia Ave to Warner Ave
Warner Ave to Barranca Pkwy/Dyer
SR-55 NB to Newport Ave
Newport Ave to Red Hill Ave
N of I-5
939 Nisson Rd 6,700 6,700
1355 Red Hill Ave
1354 Red Hill Ave
38,400
35,800
42,900
31,600
30,500
30,300
33,900
37,200
38,500
43,700
8,500
10,100
44,300
45,400
32,900
33,900
41,500
29,600
10,400
18,100
11,500
12,300
22,900
19,400
22,900
21,300
22,400
38,500
35,800
42,900
31,600
30,500
30,300
33,900
37,200
38,500
43,600
8,500
10,100
44,200
45,400
32,800
33,800
41,500
29,600
10,400
18,100
11,500
12,300
23,000
19,300
22,800
21,300
22,400
21 Red Hill Ave
1353 Red Hill Ave
22 23
24 25
26 30
Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Ave
1363 Sycamore Ave
1920 Sycamore Ave
85 86
Tustin Ranch Rd
Tustin Ranch Rd I-5 to Walnut Ave
2168 Tustin Ranch Road
2073 Tustin Ranch Road
2071 Tustin Ranch Road
2070 Tustin Ranch Road
2173 Valencia Ave
Walnut Avenue to Valencia Avenue
Valencia Avenue to Warner Avenue
Warner Avenue to Park Avenue
Park Avenue to Barranca Parkway
Newport Ave to Red Hill Ave
Red Hill Avenue to Armstrong Avenue
Armstrong Avenue to Kensington Park
Kensington Park to Tustin Ranch Road
East of Newport Ave
East of Red Hill Ave
West of Tustin Ranch Rd
Franklin Ave to Myford Rd
SR-55 to Red Hill Ave
632 Valencia Avenue
2844 Valencia Avenue
2842 Valencia Avenue
587
589
590
Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
Walnut Ave
A
B
A
A
A
B
A
A
1366 Walnut Ave
1478 Warner Ave
a Intersection within Irvine Planning Area 36--LOS E acceptable b Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) locations Iteris, Inc. | 62

City Council
21 –
17 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Figure 3.1 – Alternative 2 Daily Arterial ADT
Iteris, Inc. | 63

City Council
21 –
18 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Figure 3.2 – Alternative 2 Daily Arterial Deficiencies
Iteris, Inc. | 64

City Council
21 –
19 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final

3.3 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Link Analysis
Peak hour directional traffic volumes were directly obtained from peak hour forecast turning movement volumes for intersections upstream and downstream for each deficient arterial segment. Table 3.2 presents the results of peak hour link analysis, indicating all arterial segments within the City of Irvine that are deficient under daily conditions operate at an acceptable LOS in both peak hours, and hence no mitigation measures are recommended at this time for these facilities.

Table 3.2 – Alternative 2 Peak Hour Link Analysis
ALTERNATIVE 2 FORECAST VOLUME AM PMFACILITY
TYPE

WITH UPDATEID ARTERIAL SEGMENT LIMITS AM PM

SB/WB NB/EB SB/WB NB/EB SB/WBNB/EB
645
1,648

SB/WB NB/EB
879 Campus Drive Carlson Avenue to University 4D
7D
1,369
3,406
1,155
3,330
868
2,038
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable726 Culver Drive 213 Culver Drive
I-5 NB Ramps to I-5 SB Ramps
I-5 SB Off-Ramp to Scottsdale
Drive
Scottsdale Drive to Walnut
Avenue
Walnut Avenue to Deerfield
Avenue
Irvine Center Drive to Warner
Avenue
6D
6D
6D
6D
6D
1,615
1,580
1,361
1,356
1,462
3,102
2,689
2,786
2,797
2,699
3,020
2,839
1,957
2,650
2,726
2,556
2,162
2,786
1,937
1,830
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
214 Culver Drive
215 Culver Drive
217 Culver Drive
219 Culver Drive Barranca Parkway to Alton
Parkway
220 Culver Drive
221 Culver Drive
Alton Parkway to Main Street
Main Street to San Leandro
San Leandro to I-405 NB On-
Ramp
I-405 SB On-Ramp to
Michelson Drive
Michelson Drive to University
Drive
Michelle Drive to Walnut
Avenue
6D
6D
1,620
1,515
2,669
2,747
2,960
2,860
1,839
1,848
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
222 Culver Drive 6D
6D
2U
5D
8D
1,626
2,133
535
3,025
2,838
1,163
2,608
3,399
5,101
2,514
2,576
2,017
1,852
1,881
3,102
2,779
1,221
1,801
3,854
4,521
2,669
2,780
2,160
1,918
1,920
1,925
2,266
940
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable
224 Culver Drive
Harvard183
133
144
148
149
98 Avenue
Jamboree
Road
Jamboree
Road
Jamboree
Road
Jamboree
Road
Von Karman
Avenue
814 1,795
2,529
3,706
2,508
2,680
1,352
1,110
1,079
Kelvin Avenue to Main Street 1,812
2,736
1,854
2,140
957
I-405 On-Ramp to Michelson
Drive
Michelson Drive to Dupont
Drive
Barranca Parkway to Alton
Parkway
Alton Parkway to McGaw
Avenue
Maj8D+
2AUX
7D
4D
4D
4D
4D
Von Karman
Avenue
Von Karman
Avenue
Von Karman
Avenue
100
102
103
McGaw Avenue to Anchor
Anchor to Main Street
942
880

3.4 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Intersection Analysis
The intersection analysis includes both a reporting of intersection ICU and the corresponding LOS, as well as a comparison between Buildout Cumulative With Update and Alternative 2 scenarios. The results of this Iteris, Inc. | 65

City Council
21 –
20 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
analysis are presented in Table 3.3. There are 24 intersection deficiencies so compared to the Buildout Cumulative With Update scenario, there is one more intersections that become deficient in the Alternative 2 scenario: #720: Flower at MacArthur Boulevard (Costa Mesa). Further discussion of specific impacts, mitigation, and fair-share cost analysis is addressed in Section 3.7. Based on the Alternative 2 intersection ICU analysis, the following intersections within the study area are forecast to operate at the deficient LOS:









#12: SR-55 Frontage Road SB at Baker Street (Costa Mesa) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.91 ICU #720: Flower at MacArthur Boulevard (Costa Mesa) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.91 ICU* #98: Von Karman Avenue at Alton Parkway (Irvine) – PM Peak Hour LOS F with a 1.02 ICU #144: Jamboree Road at I-405 SB Ramps (Irvine) – AM Peak Hour LOS F with a 1.06 ICU #145: Jamboree Road at Michelson Drive (Irvine) – PM Peak Hour LOS F with a 1.02 ICU #188: Harvard Avenue at Michelson Drive (Irvine) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.91 ICU #192: California Avenue at University Drive (Irvine) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.97 ICU #232: Culver Drive at I-405 NB Ramps (Irvine) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.92 ICU #84: MacArthur Boulevard at Campus Drive (Irvine/Newport Beach) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a

0.94 ICU


#44: Red Hill Avenue at Alton Parkway (Irvine / Santa Ana) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.97 ICU #97: Von Karman Avenue/Tustin Ranch Road at Barranca Parkway (Irvine/Tustin) – PM Peak Hour LOS F with a 1.19 ICU
 #136: Jamboree Road at Barranca Parkway (Irvine/Tustin) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.94 ICU and PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 1.11 ICU


#63: Campus Drive at Bristol Street SB (Newport Beach) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.93 ICU #543: Bristol at Segerstrom (Santa Ana) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 1.00 ICU and PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.93 ICU



#544: Bristol Street at MacArthur Boulevard (Santa Ana) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.92 ICU #719: Flower at Segerstrom (Santa Ana) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 1.02 ICU* #723: Main Street at Segerstrom (Santa Ana) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 1.00 ICU and PM Peak Hour LOS F with a 1.19 ICU







#727: Halladay at Dyer (Santa Ana) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 1.00 ICU #728: Halladay E at Alton Parkway (Santa Ana) – AM Peak Hour LOS F with a 1.12 ICU #3: Newport Avenue at Edinger Avenue (Tustin) – AM Peak Hour LOS F with a 1.15 ICU #38: Red Hill Avenue at Walnut Avenue (Tustin) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.94 ICU #40: Red Hill Avenue at Edinger Avenue (Tustin) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.91 ICU #453: Red Hill Avenue at Valencia Avenue (Tustin) – AM Peak Hour LOS E with a 1.00 ICU #749: Park Avenue at A Street (Tustin) – PM Peak Hour LOS E with a 0.97 ICU *Denotes impact in Alternative 2 Scenario
Figure 3.3 and Figure 3.4 graphically present the AM and PM peak hour intersection ICU for deficient intersections for the Alternative 2 scenario. Appendix A presents detailed ICU worksheets. For shared jurisdictions, the more conservative methodology was utilized.

Iteris, Inc. | 66

City Council
21 –
21 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Table 3.3 – Alternative 2 Peak Hour Intersection LOS
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH ALTERNATIVE 2
AM PM
UPDATE

AM PMID INTERSECTION

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
10 SR-55 Frontage Rd SB at Paularino Ave
11 SR-55 Frontage Rd NB at Paularino Ave
12 SR-55 Frontage Rd SB at Baker St
13 SR-55 Frontage Rd NB at Baker St
50 Red Hill Ave at Paularino Ave
51 Red Hill Ave at Baker St
52 Red Hill Ave at Bristol St
541 Bear at Baker St
542 Bear at Paularino Ave
545 Bristol at Sunflower
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv

0.85 0.73

0.92 0.84

0.75 0.60

0.74 0.75

0.49 0.67

0.46 0.50

0.58 0.31

0.43 0.49

0.48 0.44

0.90 0.54

0.43 0.68

0.77 0.53

0.42 0.24

0.26 0.56

0.80 0.35

0.83 0.68

0.46 0.44

0.35 0.37

0.42 0.81

0.76 0.68

0.94 0.55

0.48 0.92

0.77 0.73

0.62 0.87
D
C
E

0.77 0.61

0.80 0.71

0.69 0.69

0.65 0.74

0.73 0.73

0.66 0.81

0.66 0.57

0.53 0.73

0.60 0.54

0.87 0.57

0.41 0.74

0.55 0.59

0.36 0.70

0.25 0.81

0.89 0.47

0.94 0.72

0.66 0.63

0.40 0.49

0.53 0.91

0.72 0.82

0.96 0.70

0.50 1.02

0.88 0.84

0.71 0.95
C
B
C
C
B
B
B
C
C
C
B
D
B
A
A
C
A
A
D
A
A
C
A
A
A
B
A
D
D
A
E
C
B
B
A
A
A
E
C
D
E
B
A
F
D
D
C
E

0.86 0.73

0.91 0.82

0.74 0.60

0.75 0.75

0.49 0.68

0.46 0.51

0.58 0.31

0.43 0.49

0.49 0.44

0.91 0.53

0.42 0.69

0.77 0.52

0.43 0.25

0.26 0.55

0.79 0.33

0.83 0.68

0.46 0.44

0.36 0.37

0.41 0.82

0.77 0.68

0.93 0.55

0.48 0.93

0.77 0.73

0.62 0.87
D
C
E

0.78 0.61

0.81 0.70

0.69 0.68

0.64 0.76

0.71 0.74

0.66 0.79

0.67 0.58

0.53 0.74

0.60 0.54

0.88 0.58

0.40 0.73

0.54 0.59

0.36 0.70

0.25 0.80

0.86 0.43

0.91 0.71

0.65 0.62

0.40 0.48

0.53 0.92

0.72 0.82

0.96 0.70

0.50 1.02

0.87 0.84

0.71 0.96
C
B
D
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
B
C
B
A
A
C
A
A
D
A
A
C
A
A
A
B
A
C
D
A
E
C
B
B
A
A
A
E
C
D
E
B
A
F
D
D
C
E
*
D
C
A
C
C
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
D
A
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
D
B
A
A
A
A
A
D
C
B
E
D
C
A
C
C
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
E
A
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
D
B
A
A
A
A
A
D
C
B
E
546 Bristol at Anton
547 Bristol at Paularino Ave
548 Bristol at Baker St
549 Newport Blvd SB at Bristol
550 Newport Blvd NB at Bristol
715 Bristol at I-405 NB Off Ramp
716 Bristol at I-405 SB Ramps
717 Bear at SR-73 SB Ramps
720 Flower at MacArthur Blvd
721 Flower at Sunflower
722 Anton at Sunflower
726 Main St at Sunflower
735 Newport Blvd NB at Del mar
736 Newport Blvd SB at Fair/Del Mar
737 Newport Blvd NB at Mesa Rd
738 Newport Blvd SB at Mesa Rd
32 Daimler St at McGaw Ave
45 Red Hill Ave at McGaw Ave
47 Red Hill Ave at MacArthur Blvd
48 Red Hill Ave at Sky Park N
49 Red Hill Ave at Main St
66 Gillette Avenue at Alton Parkway
67 Gillette Ave at McGaw Ave
70 Gillette Ave at Main Street
73 Armstrong Avenue and Alton Parkway West
74 Armstrong Avenue and Alton Parkway East
77 MacArthur Blvd at Sky Park East
78 MacArthur Blvd at Main St
79 MacArthur Blvd at I-405 NB Ramps
80 MacArthur Blvd at I-405 SB Ramps
82 MacArthur Blvd at Michelson Dr
83 MacArthur Blvd at Douglas Ave
87 Dupont Dr at Michelson Dr
98 Von Karman Ave at Alton Pkwy
99 Von Karman Ave at McGaw Ave
100 Von Karman Ave at Main St
101 Von Karman Ave at Morse Ave
102 Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
A
A
E
C
C
B
D
A
A
E
C
C
B
D
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Iteris, Inc. | 67

City Council
21 –
22 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH ALTERNATIVE 2
AM PM
UPDATE

AM PMID INTERSECTION

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
103 Von Karman Ave at Dupont Dr
104 Von Karman Ave at Martin
115 Millikan Ave at Alton Pkwy
116 Cartwright Rd at Main St
119 Teller Ave at Michelson Dr
128 Jamboree Rd at I-5 NB Ramps
129 Jamboree Rd at I-5 SB Ramps
130 Jamboree Rd at Michelle Dr
131 Jamboree Rd SB at Walnut Ave
132 Jamboree Rd NB at Walnut Ave
135 Jamboree Rd NB Ramps at Warner Ave
137 Jamboree Rd at Beckman Ave
138 Jamboree Rd at Alton Pkwy
139 Jamboree Rd at McGaw Ave
140 Jamboree Rd at Kelvin Ave
141 Jamboree Rd at Main St
143 Jamboree Rd at I-405 NB Ramps
144 Jamboree Rd at I-405 SB Ramps
145 Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr
146 Jamboree Rd at Dupont Rd
164 Construction S at Barranca Pkwy
168 Murphy Ave at Alton Pkwy
170 Union at Main St
a
a
a
a
a
b
b
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv

0.66 0.48

0.45 0.51

0.67 0.86

0.75 0.71

0.64 0.48

0.45 0.64

0.76 0.70

0.70 0.80

0.82 1.06

0.91 0.64

0.39 0.41

0.38 0.38

0.67 0.71

0.44 0.51

0.57 0.69

0.64 0.65

0.75 0.83

0.69 0.49

0.97 0.74

0.45 0.47

0.50 0.57

0.78 0.84

0.70 0.76

0.82 0.78

0.80 B
A
A
A
B
D
C
C
B
A
A
B
C
B
B
C
D
F

0.71 0.64

0.65 0.66

0.64 0.73

0.59 0.79

0.68 0.63

0.90 0.76

0.90 0.77

0.72 0.93

0.95 0.93

1.02 0.73

0.68 0.74

0.65 0.60

0.84 0.81

0.56 0.73

0.75 0.69

0.80 0.64

0.91 0.86

0.77 0.60

0.81 0.65

0.44 0.61

0.68 0.59

0.71 0.78

0.64 0.87

0.84 0.78

0.74 C
B
B
B
B
C
A
C
B
B
D
C
D
C
C
E

0.66 0.47

0.44 0.51

0.67 0.86

0.76 0.71

0.63 0.47

0.45 0.62

0.77 0.71

0.70 0.80

0.83 1.06

0.91 0.64

0.39 0.41

0.38 0.38

0.67 0.71

0.44 0.51

0.57 0.69

0.64 0.65

0.75 0.84

0.69 0.50

0.97 0.74

0.45 0.47

0.50 0.57

0.79 0.84

0.70 0.76

0.81 0.78

0.80 B
A
A
A
B
D
C
C
B
A
A
B
C
C
B
C
D
F

0.71 0.64

0.65 0.66

0.64 0.73

0.59 0.80

0.67 0.63

0.90 0.76

0.90 0.77

0.72 0.94

0.96 0.94

1.02 0.74

0.68 0.74

0.66 0.60

0.84 0.81

0.56 0.73

0.74 0.69

0.80 0.64

0.91 0.86

0.77 0.59

0.81 0.65

0.44 0.61

0.68 0.59

0.71 0.78

0.64 0.87

0.84 0.78

0.74 C
B
B
B
B
C
A
C
B
B
D
C
D
C
C
E
a
a
a
a
a
a,b
a,b
a
a
a
E
E
F
E
E
FE E
B
A
A
A
A
B
C
A
A
A
B
B
B
C
D
B
A
E
C
A
A
A
A
C
D
B
C
D
C
C
C
B
C
B
A
D
D
A
C
C
B
C
B
E
D
C
A
D
B
A
B
B
A
C
C
B
D
D
C
C
B
A
A
A
A
B
C
A
A
A
B
B
B
C
D
B
A
E
C
A
A
A
A
C
D
B
C
D
C
C
C
B
C
B
A
D
D
A
C
C
B
C
B
E
D
C
A
D
B
A
B
B
A
C
C
B
D
D
C
C
a
a
171 Veneto at Main St
174 Carlson Ave at Michelson Dr
175 Carlson Ave at Campus Dr
180 Harvard Ave at Walnut Ave
183 Harvard Ave at Warner Ave
184 Harvard Ave at Barranca Pkwy
185 Harvard Ave at Alton Pkwy
186 Harvard Ave at Main St
187 Harvard Ave at Coronado
188 Harvard Ave Michelson Dr
189 Harvard Ave University Dr
190 University Dr at Campus Dr
191 Mesa Rd at University Dr
192 California Ave at University Dr
196 Hearthstone Blvd at Irvine Center Dr
198 Paseo Westpark at Warner Ave
199 Paseo Westpark at Barranca Pkwy
200 Paseo Westpark at Alton Pkwy
201 Paseo Westpark at Main St
221 Culver Dr at Bryan Ave
√
222 Culver Dr at Trabuco Rd
223 Culver Dr at I-5 SB Ramps
224 Culver Dr at Walnut Ave
225 Culver Dr at Deerfield Dr
226 Culver Dr at Irvine Center Dr
227 Culver Dr at Warner Ave
√
√
Iteris, Inc. | 68

City Council
21 –
23 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH ALTERNATIVE 2
AM PM
UPDATE

AM PMID INTERSECTION

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
228 Culver Dr at Barranca Pkwy
229 Culver Dr at Alton Pkwy
230 Culver Dr at Main St
231 Culver Dr at San Leandro
232 Culver Dr at I-405 NB Ramps
233 Culver Dr at I-405 SB Ramps
234 Culver Dr at Michelson Dr
235 Culver Dr at University Dr
337 Von Karman Ave at Quartz
439 Bixby at Michelson Dr
√
√
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv
Irv

0.79 0.75

0.67 0.78

0.71 0.73

0.64 0.82

0.78 0.48

0.40 0.58

0.74 0.75

0.45 0.83

0.74 0.88

0.83 0.70

0.76 0.82

0.75 0.67

0.52 1.02

0.77 0.53
C
C
B
C
C
C
B
D
C
A
A
A
C
C
A
D
C
D
D
B
C
D
C
B
A
F

0.80 0.87

0.79 0.62

0.92 0.72

0.86 0.79

0.86 0.56

0.56 0.68

0.93 0.85

0.58 0.82

0.76 0.87

0.90 0.78

0.68 0.57

0.64 0.69

0.88 1.32

0.90 0.74
C
D
C
B
E
C
D
C
D
A
A
B
E
D
A
D
C
D
D
C
B
A
B
B
D
F

0.79 0.77

0.68 0.78

0.71 0.73

0.64 0.82

0.78 0.48

0.40 0.57

0.74 0.75

0.45 0.83

0.74 0.88

0.84 0.70

0.76 0.83

0.75 0.68

0.51 0.83

0.77 0.52
C
C
B
C
C
C
B
D
C
A
A
A
C
C
A
D
C
D
D
B
C
D
C
B
A
D
C
A

0.80 0.88

0.78 0.62

0.92 0.72

0.87 0.80

0.85 0.56

0.56 0.68

0.94 0.85

0.58 0.82

0.76 0.88

0.89 0.78

0.68 0.57

0.64 0.71

0.87 0.97

0.89 0.74
C
D
C
B
E
C
D
C
D
A
A
B
E
D
A
D
C
D
D
C
B
A
B
C
D
E
√
a
a
Irv
Irv
Irv
440 Siglo at Main St
472 Obsidian at Michelson Dr
84 MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr
105 Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr
121 Teller Ave at Campus Dr
147 Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr
149 Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd
150 Jamboree Rd at MacArthur Blvd
176 Fairchild Ave at MacArthur Blvd
193 MacArthur Blvd NB at University Dr
194 MacArthur Blvd SB at University Dr
195 SR-73 SB Ramps at University Dr
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/NB
Irv/SA
Irv/SA
Irv/SA
Irv/SA
Irv/SA/Tus
Irv/Tus
b
9 SR-55 NB Ramps at MacArthur Blvd
31 Daimler St at Alton Pkwy
43 Red Hill Ave at Deere Ave
44 Red Hill Ave at Alton Pkwy
42 Red Hill Ave at Barranca Pkwy/Dyer Rd
71 Armstrong Ave at Barranca Pkwy
Von Karman Ave/Tustin Ranch Rd at
C
A
D
C
D
C
97 Irv/Tus 0.89 D 1.19 F 0.90 D 1.19 FBarranca Pkwy
112 Myford Rd at Michelle Dr
113 Myford Rd at Walnut Ave
114 Millikan Ave/District Way at Barranca Pkwy
126 Jamboree Rd at Bryan Ave
127 Jamboree Rd at El Camino Real
134 Loop Rd/Park Ave at Warner Ave
136 Jamboree Rd at Barranca Pkwy
181 Harvard Ave at Edinger Ave/Irvine Center Dr
182 Harvard Ave at Paseo Westpark/Moffett Dr.
441 Loop Rd at Jamboree Rd SB Ramps
61 Campus Dr at Airport Way
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
Irv/Tus
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB

0.36 0.36

0.53 0.72

0.74 0.50

0.94 0.54

0.42 0.39

0.55 0.79

0.93 0.75

0.61 0.65

0.50 0.48

0.68 0.37
A
A
A
C
C
A
E
A
A
A
A
C
E
C
B
B
A
A
B
A

0.28 0.49

0.72 0.80

0.80 0.78

1.11 0.72

0.52 0.80

0.86 0.81

0.74 0.73

0.65 0.78

0.56 0.67

0.58 0.58
A
A
C
C
C
C
F
C
A
C
D
D
C
C
B
C
A
B
A
A

0.37 0.36

0.53 0.72

0.74 0.50

0.94 0.54

0.42 0.39

0.55 0.79

0.93 0.75

0.61 0.65

0.50 0.47

0.67 0.37
A
A
A
C
C
A
E
A
A
A
A
C
E
C
B
B
A
A
B
A

0.28 0.48

0.72 0.80

0.80 0.78

1.11 0.73

0.51 0.80

0.86 0.80

0.74 0.73

0.65 0.78

0.56 0.67

0.58 0.59
A
A
C
C
C
C
F
C
A
C
D
C
C
C
B
C
A
B
A
A
62 Campus Dr at Bristol St NB
63 Campus Dr at Bristol St SB
64 Birch St at Bristol St NB
65 Birch St at Bristol St SB
85 MacArthur Blvd at Birch St
106 Von Karman Ave at Birch St
107 Von Karman Ave at MacArthur Blvd
148 Jamboree Rd at Birch St
151 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St NB NB
Iteris, Inc. | 69

City Council
21 –
24 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH ALTERNATIVE 2
AM PM
UPDATE

AM PMID INTERSECTION

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
153 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St SB
154 Jamboree Rd at Eastbluff Dr
155 Jamboree Rd at Bison Ave
156 Jamboree Rd at Ford Rd
178 MacArthur Blvd at Bison Ave
179 MacArthur Blvd at Ford Rd
741 Jamboree at San Joaquin
742 MacArthur at San Joaquin
733 Irvine at Mesa Rd
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB
NB/OC
NB/OC
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA
SA

0.69 0.69

0.47 0.90

0.67 0.66

0.62 0.51

0.73 0.68

0.81 0.61

0.81 0.85

0.70 0.60

1.00 0.80

0.37 0.84

1.00 0.62

0.67 0.88

1.12 0.82

0.65 0.63

1.15 0.51

0.54 0.84

0.85 0.81

0.63 0.68

0.82 0.68

0.50 0.62

0.54 0.67

0.78 0.71

0.76 0.43

0.51 0.47

0.73 B
B
A
D
B
B
B
A
C
B
D
B
D
D
B
A
E
C
A
D
E
B
B
D
F

0.60 0.62

0.55 0.77

0.66 0.68

0.56 0.73

0.74 0.75

0.69 0.77

0.68 0.59

0.62 0.81

0.93 0.92

0.64 1.00

1.19 0.81

0.83 1.00

0.84 0.77

0.72 0.53

0.67 0.52

0.67 0.79

0.85 0.62

0.73 0.57

0.84 0.66

0.48 0.80

0.54 0.78

0.94 0.67

0.91 0.59

0.49 0.66

0.82 A
B
A
C
B
B
A
C
C
C
B
C
B
A
B
D
E

0.70 0.69

0.47 0.90

0.68 0.66

0.62 0.51

0.73 0.68

0.81 0.61

0.81 0.85

0.70 0.60

1.00 0.80

0.37 0.84

1.00 0.63

0.68 0.88

1.12 0.82

0.64 0.66

1.15 0.49

0.54 0.84

0.85 0.80

0.62 0.67

0.83 0.70

0.49 0.62

0.54 0.68

0.79 0.71

0.76 0.42

0.50 0.48

0.73 B
B
A
D
B
B
B
A
C
B
D
B
D
D
B
A
E
C
A
D
E
B
B
D
F

0.60 0.62

0.55 0.77

0.67 0.68

0.56 0.72

0.74 0.75

0.69 0.77

0.69 0.59

0.63 0.81

0.93 0.92

0.64 1.02

1.19 0.82

0.83 1.00

0.85 0.77

0.72 0.53

0.67 0.53

0.67 0.78

0.85 0.62

0.73 0.56

0.84 0.66

0.48 0.80

0.54 0.78

0.94 0.67

0.91 0.60

0.50 0.67

0.82 A
B
A
C
B
B
A
C
C
C
B
C
B
A
B
D
E
734 Irvine at University/Del Mar
4 5
6 7
8 SR-55 SB Ramps at Edinger Ave
Hotel Terrace Dr at Dyer Rd
Grand Ave at Dyer Rd
SR-55 NB Ramps at Dyer Rd
SR-55 SB Ramps at MacArthur Blvd
b
c
29 Pullman St at Barranca Pkwy
543 Bristol at Segerstrom
544 Bristol St at MacArthur Blvd
718 Bear at SR-73 NB Ramps
719 Flower at Segerstrom
723 Main St at Segerstrom
724 Main St at Alton Ave
725 Main and MacArthur (w/o SR-55)
727 Halladay at Dyer Rd
E
B
E
E
B
F*
c
F F
D
D
E
D
D
E
728 Halladay E at Alton Pkwy
729 Halladay W at Alton Pkwy
730 Grand Ave at Warner
D
C
C
A
B
A
B
C
D
B
C
A
D
B
A
C
A
C
E
D
C
C
A
B
A
B
C
D
B
C
A
D
B
A
C
A
C
E
SA
SA
SA
D
B
B
F
D
B
B
F
731 SR-55 SB Ramps at Grand Ave
3 Newport Ave at Edinger Ave Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
14 Walnut Ave at McFadden Ave
18 Newport Ave at Bryan Ave
19 Newport Ave at Main St
A
A
D
D
D
B
B
D
B
A
B
A
B
C
C
C
A
A
A
C
A
A
D
D
C
B
B
D
B
A
B
A
B
C
C
C
A
A
A
C
20 Newport Ave at El Camino Real
21 Newport Ave at I-5 NB Ramps
22 Newport Ave at I-5 SB Ramp/Nisson Rd
23 Newport Ave at McFadden St
24 Newport Ave at Walnut Ave
25 Newport Ave at Sycamore Ave
27 Del Amo Ave at Edinger Ave
35 Red Hill Ave at Bryan Ave
36 Red Hill Ave at El Camino Real
37 Red Hill Ave at Nisson Rd
38 Red Hill Ave at Walnut Ave
39 Red Hill Ave at Sycamore Ave
40 Red Hill Ave at Edinger Ave
55 Browning Ave at Bryan Ave
56 Browning Ave at El Camino Real
58 Browning Ave at Walnut Ave
92 Tustin Ranch Rd at Bryan Ave
B
E
A
A
B
D
B
E
A
A
B
D
Iteris, Inc. | 70

City Council
21 –
25 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH ALTERNATIVE 2
AM PM
UPDATE

AM PMID INTERSECTION

ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS
93 Tustin Ranch Rd at El Camino Real
94 Tustin Ranch Rd at I-5 NB Ramps
95 Tustin Ranch Rd at I-5 SB Ramps
96 Tustin Ranch Rd at Walnut Ave
109 Myford Rd at Bryan Ave
110 Myford Rd at El Camino Real
111 Franklin Ave at Walnut Ave
133 Jamboree Rd at Edinger Ave
445 Tustin Ranch Rd at Warner Ave N
446 Tustin Ranch Rd at Warner Ave S
447 Armstrong Ave/Severyns Rd Valencia Ave
448 Armstrong Ave at Warner Ave
453 Red Hill Ave at Valencia Ave
454 Tustin Ranch Rd at Valencia Ave
455 E Connector/Jamboree Plaza at Edinger Ave
456 N Loop Rd at Valencia Ave
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus
Tus/SA
Tus/SA
Tus/SA

0.86 0.65

0.70 0.68

0.52 0.44

0.53 0.47

0.54 0.64

0.37 0.38

1.00 0.60

0.58 0.17

0.47 0.67

0.68 0.21

0.64 0.75

0.58 0.60

0.50 0.45

0.36 0.36

0.75 0.45

0.65 0.17

0.47 0.62

0.56 0.54
D
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
E
A
A
A
A
B
B
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
B
A
A
B
A
A

0.76 0.57

0.66 0.87

0.66 0.66

0.84 0.74

0.73 0.81

0.41 0.43

0.79 0.68

0.66 0.15

0.37 0.65

0.80 0.19

0.65 0.71

0.68 0.89

0.65 0.60

0.37 0.48

0.97 0.67

0.73 0.16

0.40 0.67

0.77 0.67
C
A
B
D
B
B
D
C
C
D
A
A
C
B
B
A
A
B
C
A
B
C
B
D
B
A
A
A
E

0.86 0.65

0.70 0.69

0.52 0.44

0.53 0.47

0.54 0.65

0.37 0.38

1.00 0.59

0.58 0.17

0.47 0.67

0.68 0.21

0.64 0.75

0.58 0.60

0.50 0.45

0.36 0.36

0.75 0.45

0.65 0.17

0.47 0.63

0.56 0.54
D
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
E
A
A
A
A
B
B
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
B
A
A
B
A
A

0.77 0.57

0.66 0.87

0.66 0.66

0.84 0.74

0.73 0.80

0.41 0.43

0.81 0.68

0.66 0.15

0.37 0.65

0.79 0.19

0.65 0.71

0.68 0.90

0.65 0.60

0.37 0.48

0.97 0.67

0.73 0.16

0.40 0.67

0.77 0.67
C
A
B
D
B
B
D
C
C
C
A
A
D
B
B
A
A
B
C
A
B
C
B
D
B
A
A
A
E
b
457 N Loop Rd at Moffett Dr
478 Red Hill Ave at I-5 NB Ramps
479 Red Hill Ave at I-5 SB Ramps
480 Tustin Ranch Rd/Connector at Edinger Ave
732 SR-55 NB Ramp at Newport Ave
739 Newport Ave at Mitchell Ave
740 Red Hill Ave at Mitchell Ave
743 Newport Ave at Valencia
745 Tustin Ranch Rd at Park Ave
746 Kensington Park Dr at Edinger Ave
747 Kensington Park Dr at Valencia Ave
748 Armstrong Ave at A St
749 Park Ave at A St
750 Legacy Rd at Warner Ave
751 Tustin Ranch Rd at Legacy Rd
752 Legacy Rd at N Loop Rd
753 Tustin Ranch Rd at Edinger Ave Connector
28 Pullman St at Warner Ave
B
C
A
A
B
C
B
B
C
A
A
B
C
B
41 Red Hill Ave at Warner Ave
754 Red Hill Ave at Carnegie Ave
F
a
b
c
√
*
Denotes intersection operating at a deficient LOS
Intersection within Irvine Planning Area 36--LOS E acceptable Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) locations Intersections within City of Santa Ana--LOS E acceptable ATMS credit-Reduction of 0.05 applied to ICU
Impact
Iteris, Inc. | 71

City Council
21 –
26 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Figure 3.3 – Alternative 2 AM Peak Hour Intersection Deficiencies Iteris, Inc. | 72

City Council
21 –
27 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Figure 3.4 – Alternative 2 PM Peak Hour Intersection Deficiencies Iteris, Inc. | 73

City Council
21 –
28 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final

3.5 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Freeway Mainline Analysis
Future freeway mainline volumes are based on forecast traffic using the ITAM model. Table 3.4 presents the freeway mainline segment analysis for Alternative 2 conditions and compares mainline segment performance to Buildout Cumulative With Update conditions. The Alternative 2 scenario does not include any freeway mainline capacity improvements, consequently, the capacities are consistent with the Buildout Cumulative With Update scenario. Appendix B presents detailed HCS worksheets for mainline analysis.

The same segments that are forecast to be deficient in the Buildout With Update scenario are also deficient in Alternative 2. In the AM peak, 34 out of 60 freeway segments operate at a deficient LOS and in the PM peak 27 out of 60 operate at a deficient LOS. In total 40 segments are deficient in one or both peaks. The deficient segments are:

AM Peak Hour:

I-5 Northbound  Between Culver Drive and Jamboree Road  Between Jamboree Road and Tustin Ranch Road
 Between Tustin Ranch Road and Red Hill Avenue
 Between Red Hill Avenue and Newport Avenue
 Between Newport Avenue and SR-55
 North of SR-55
Southbound  Between Jamboree Road and Culver Drive
 Between Tustin Ranch Road and Jamboree Road
 Between Red Hill Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road
 Between Newport Avenue and Red Hill Avenue
 North of SR-55
I-405 Northbound
Southbound
 Between Culver Drive and Jamboree Road
 Between Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard
 Between MacArthur Boulevard and SR-55
 Between Jamboree Road and Culver Drive
 Between SR-55 and MacArthur Boulevard
 Between Bristol Street and SR-55
 Between SR-73 and Bristol Street
SR-55
SR-73
Northbound
Southbound
 Fair Drive to SR-73
 McFadden Street/Sycamore Avenue to I-5
 Between Dyer Road and MacArthur Boulevard
 Between Edinger Avenue and Dyer Road
 Between McFadden Street/Sycamore Avenue and Edinger Avenue  Between I-5 and McFadden Street/Sycamore Avenue
 Between MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive
 Between University Drive and Jamboree Road
 Between Jamboree Road and Birch Street
 Between Birch Street and Campus Drive
 Between Campus Drive and SR-55
Northbound
Southbound  Between University Drive and MacArthur Boulevard  Between Campus Drive and Birch Street
 Between SR-55 and Campus Drive
 Between SR-55 and Bear Street
SR-261 Southbound
Northbound
 South of El Camino Real
PM Peak Hour:

I-5  Between Culver Drive to Jamboree Road
 Between Jamboree Road to Tustin Rach Road
 Between Tustin Ranch Road and Red Hill Avenue
 Between Red Hill Avenue and Newport Avenue
Iteris, Inc. | 74

City Council
21 –
29 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
 Between Newport Avenue and SR-55
 North of SR-55
Southbound  Between Jamboree Road and Culver Drive
 Between Tustin Ranch Road and Jamboree Road
 Between Red Hill Avenue and Tustin Ranch Road
 Between Newport Avenue and Red Hill Avenue
 North of SR-55
I-405  Northbound
 Southbound
Northbound
 Between Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard
 Between SR-55 and MacArthur Boulevard
 Between Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard
 Between SR-55 and MacArthur Boulevard
 Between MacArthur Boulevard and Dyer Road
 Between Dyer Road and Edinger Avenue
 Between Edinger Avenue to McFadden Street/Sycamore Avenue  Between McFadden Street/Sycamore Avenue and I-5
 Between Edinger Avenue to Dyer Road
 Between Jamboree Road and Birch Street
 Between Birch Street and Campus Drive
 Between Campus Drive and SR-55
SR-55
Southbound
NorthboundSR-73
 Between SR-55 and Bear Street
Southbound  Between MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive  Between Birch Street and Campus Drive
 Between SR-55 and Campus Drive
Table 3.4 – Alternative 2 Freeway Peak Hour Mainline LOS

BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH UPDATE

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
ALTERNATIVE 2

AM PEAK HOURFREEWAY LANES PM PEAK HOUR

LOCATION
Culver Dr to Jamboree
Rd
Jamboree Rd to Tustin
Ranch Rd
Tustin Ranch Rd to Red
Hill Ave
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
6 6
6 6
6 6
5 6
6 4
5 5
5 4
6 7
6 6
4 5
5 5
12,000 13,482 1.12
12,000 12,970 1.08
12,000 13,158 1.10
12,000 12,969 1.08
12,000 13,299 1.11
12,000 13,562 1.13
10,000 12,645 1.05
12,000 13,083 1.09
12,000 13,262 1.11
8,000 9,981 0.83
10,000 11,249 1.12
10,000 10,517 1.05
10,000 13,859 1.15
8,000 10,460 1.05
12,000 13,628 1.14
14,000 12,326 0.88
12,000 12,411 1.03
12,000 13,969 1.16
8,000 6,152 0.62
10,000 10,591 1.06
10,000 7,211 0.72
10,000 10,144 1.01
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
C
F
D
F
12,029 1.00
12,372 1.03
11,971 1.00
11,990 1.00
12,210 1.02
12,370 1.03
11,684 0.97
11,682 0.97
12,279 1.02
8,892 0.74
10,466 1.05
9,123 0.91
10,617 0.88
12,118 1.21
11,628 0.97
12,158 0.87
12,567 1.05
11,739 0.98
6,891 0.69
7,946 0.79
8,306 0.83
6,918 0.69
E
F
E
E
F
13,482 1.12 F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
F
F
F
D
F
F
C
F
D
F
12,033 1.00 E
F
E
E
F
12,898 1.07
13,132 1.09
13,084 1.09
13,286 1.11
13,672 1.14
12,638 1.05
13,190 1.10
13,236 1.10
10,030 0.84
11,165 1.12
10,458 1.05
13,858 1.15
10,446 1.04
13,637 1.14
12,248 0.87
12,430 1.04
13,881 1.16
6,167 0.62
10,509 1.05
7,213 0.72
10,094 1.01
12,374 1.03
11,991 1.00
11,990 1.00
12,224 1.02
12,378 1.03
11,691 0.97
11,688 0.97
12,327 1.03
8,905 0.74
10,496 1.05
9,117 0.91
10,661 0.89
12,116 1.21
11,604 0.97
12,171 0.87
12,597 1.05
11,763 0.98
6,883 0.69
7,981 0.80
8,338 0.83
6,922 0.69
F F
Red Hill Ave to Newport NB E
E
F
D
F
E
D
F
E
D
F
E
C
D
D
C
E
E
F
D
F
E
D
F
E
D
F
E
C
D
D
C
Ave SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
Newport Ave to SR-55
North of SR-55
Culver Dr to Jamboree
Rd
Jamboree Rd to
MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to SR-55
SR-55 to Bristol St
Bristol St to SR-73
Iteris, Inc. | 75

City Council
21 –
30 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final

BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH UPDATE

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
ALTERNATIVE 2

AM PEAK HOURFREEWAY LANES PM PEAK HOUR

LOCATION
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
4 3
4 3
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
5 8,000 3,984 0.66
6,000 3,187 0.53
8,000 6,396 0.80
6,000 5,006 0.63
8,000 7,911 0.99
8,000 5,887 0.74
8,000 7,009 0.88
8,000 6,818 0.85
8,000 7,009 0.88
8,000 6,818 0.85
8,000 9,035 0.75
8,000 10,674 0.89
8,000 8,094 0.81
8,000 10,668 1.07
8,000 8,198 0.82
8,000 10,999 1.37
10,000 8,431 0.84
C
C
D
C
E
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
3,424 0.57
3,276 0.55
4,867 0.61
5,556 0.69
6,210 0.78
6,500 0.81
6,143 0.77
6,675 0.83
6,143 0.77
6,675 0.83
9,220 0.77
8,947 0.75
9,387 0.94
8,070 0.81
10,330 1.03
7,674 0.96
10,377 1.04
C 4,044 0.67 C
C
D
C
E
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
F
3,424 0.57
3,278 0.55
C
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
E
South of Victoria St
Victoria St to Fair Dr
Fair Dr to SR-73
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
E
3,195 0.53
6,425 0.80
5,020 0.63
7,927 0.99
5,911 0.74
7,045 0.88
6,829 0.85
7,045 0.88
6,829 0.85
9,058 0.75
10,675 0.89
8,085 0.81
10,714 1.07
8,205 0.82
10,952 1.37
8,395 0.84
4,874 0.61
5,553 0.69
6,225 0.78
6,498 0.81
6,153 0.77
6,678 0.83
6,153 0.77
6,678 0.83
9,260 0.77
8,951 0.75
9,394 0.94
8,056 0.81
10,319 1.03
7,662 0.96
10,374 1.04
SR-73 to Baker St
Baker St to I-405
I-405 to MacArthur Blvd
MacArthur Blvd to Dyer NB
Rd SB
NB
SB
D
F
E
D
F
E
D
F
D
D
F
D
Dyer Rd to Edinger Ave
Edinger Ave to
McFadden St/ Sycamore
Ave
NB F F
SB 4 8,000 11,638 1.16 F 8,118 0.81 D 11,581 1.16 F 8,103 0.81 D McFadden St/Sycamore NB 5
5 3
3 3
4 3
3 4
3 4
4 4
4 3
3 3
3 10,000 9,110 0.91
10,000 10,964 1.10
6,000 6,114 0.61
6,000 8,447 0.84
6,000 8,333 1.04
8,000 7,461 0.93
6,000 7,563 0.95
6,000 5,583 0.70
8,000 9,667 1.21
6,000 6,891 0.86
8,000 7,835 0.98
8,000 8,291 1.04
8,000 8,834 1.10
8,000 10,630 1.33
6,000 6,459 0.81
6,000 7,194 0.90
6,000 5,505 0.69
6,000 6,577 0.82
E
F
C
D
F
E
E
C
F
D
E
F
F
F
D
E
C
D
10,957 1.10
7,971 0.80
7,829 0.78
5,777 0.58
6,857 0.86
7,575 0.95
5,730 0.72
6,072 0.76
8,562 1.07
7,095 0.89
7,412 0.93
7,711 0.96
9,839 1.23
8,854 1.11
7,218 0.90
5,884 0.74
6,174 0.77
5,126 0.64
F
D
D
C
D
E
D
D
F
D
E
E
F
F
9,092 0.91
10,950 1.09
6,164 0.62
8,426 0.84
8,362 1.05
7,461 0.93
7,588 0.95
5,582 0.70
9,666 1.21
6,895 0.86
7,840 0.98
8,298 1.04
8,839 1.10
10,640 1.33
6,462 0.81
7,195 0.90
5,510 0.69
6,620 0.83
E
F
C
D
F
E
E
C
F
D
E
F
F
F
D
E
C
D
10,962 1.10
7,943 0.79
7,852 0.79
5,796 0.58
6,835 0.85
7,572 0.95
5,707 0.71
6,068 0.76
8,541 1.07
7,092 0.89
7,388 0.92
7,696 0.96
9,802 1.23
8,852 1.11
7,195 0.90
5,885 0.74
6,144 0.77
5,128 0.64
F
D
D
C
D
E
C
D
F
D
E
E
F
F
Ave to I-5 SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
North of I-5
MacArthur Blvd to
University Dr
University Dr to
Jamboree Rd
Jamboree Rd to Birch St
Birch St to Campus Dr
Campus Dr to SR-55
SR-55 to Bear St E E
D
D
C
D
D
CBear St to I-405
NB 2 4,000 922 0.12 A 3,125 0.39
1,295 0.32
B
B
922 0.12 A 3,115 0.39
1,292 0.32
B
B
SR-261 South of El
Camino Real 3,728 0.93 E 3,730 0.93 ESB 2 4,000
Note:
*Impacted location. No HCM Analysis required for LOS F locations With Update impacts per performance criteria.

3.6 Alternative 2 Peak Hour Freeway Ramp Analysis
The ramp analysis methodology for Alternative 2 is consistent with that applied for Buildout Cumulative With Update. Table 3.5 displays the freeway ramp interchange, ramp type, number of lanes, peak hour capacity, Iteris, Inc. | 76

City Council
21 –
31 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
volumes, densities, and LOS. Appendix C presents detailed HCS worksheets for ramp analysis. When compared to the Buildout Cumulative With Update scenario, there is one additional deficient location at the Southbound SR-55 Off-Ramp to Baker Street. Impacts on freeway ramps are addressed in Section 3.7 in accordance with the impact criteria agreed to by the City and Caltrans. The deficient ramp locations are:

AM Peak Hour:

I-5
I-405
Northbound
Northbound
 Off-Ramp to Jamboree Road
 Off-Ramp to Jamboree Road
 Off-Ramp to MacArthur Boulevard
 Off-Ramp to Jamboree Road
 Off-Ramp to MacArthur Boulevard
 Direct On-Ramp from Fair Drive
 On-Ramp from Paularino Avenue
 Off-Ramp to Paularino Avenue
 Off-Ramp to Dyer Road
Southbound
Northbound
Southbound
SR-55
SR-73 Northbound
Southbound
 Off-Ramp to Birch Street
 Off-Ramp to MacArthur Boulevard
 Off-Ramp to Campus Drive
PM Peak Hour:

I-5 Northbound
Southbound
Northbound
 Off-Ramp to Jamboree Road
 Direct On-Ramp from Jamboree Road
 Direct On-Ramp from Bristol Street*
 Off-Ramp to Bristol Street
I-405
Southbound
Northbound
 Off-Ramp to Jamboree Road
SR-55  Direct On-Ramp from Fair Drive
 On-Ramp from Paularino Avenue
 Direct On-Ramp from MacArthur Boulevard
 On-Ramp from Edinger Avenue
 On-Ramp from McFadden Avenue
 Off-Ramp to Victoria StreetSouthbound
Northbound
 Off-Ramp to Baker Street
 Off-Ramp to Paularino Avenue
 On-Ramp North of University Drive from MacArthur Boulevard  On-Ramp from Jamboree Road
 Off-Ramp to Birch Street
SR-73
 On-Ramp from Campus Drive
 Off-Ramp to Bear Street
Southbound  Off-Ramp to MacArthur Boulevard
*Denotes freeway ramp impacts.

Figure 3.5 and Figure 3.6 graphically depict the Alternative 2 freeway and ramp deficiencies.

Iteris, Inc. | 77

City Council
21 –
32 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Table 3.5 – Alternative 2 Peak Hour Freeway Ramp LOS
RAMP

CAPACITY

BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH UPDATE

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
ALTERNATIVE 2

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR

INTERCHANGE
Culver Dr

RAMP TYPE
SB On Direct
SB On Loop
SB Off
NB On Loop
NB On Direct
NB Off
SB On Direct
SB On Loop
SB Off
1 1
2 2
1 1
2 2
2 2
2 1
2 3
1 2
2 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
2 1
1 2
2 1
2 1
2 2
2 2
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
1 1
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
1,000
500
335
597
841
750
653
504
401
862
1,160 0.39
570
480
1,693 1.13
690 0.46

0.37 0.66

0.37 0.50

0.73 0.34

0.27 0.57
B
C
B
B
D
B
A
C
B
C
B
F
B
C
B
B
C
C
C
B
C
C
B
B
B
B
D
C
B
A
F
559
300
1,811 0.80
480
175
763
1,420 0.95
440 0.29
1,324 0.44
570
300
1,444 0.96
770
970
562
1,024 0.46
1,040 0.69

0.62 0.33
C
B
D
B
A
C
E
A
B
C
A
E
334
595
840
750
652
509
401
852
1,160
580
480
1,693
690
1,090
696
1,072
892
813
840
500
770
930
570
430
1,087
740
1,250
1,228
810
365
2,690
640
1,390
2,663
620
2,544
550
2,601
1,104
993
160
673
824
517

0.37 0.66

0.37 0.50

0.72 0.34

0.27 0.57

0.39 0.54

0.44 1.13

0.46 0.61

0.46 0.48

0.59 0.54

0.56 0.33

0.51 0.62

0.38 0.48

0.36 0.49

0.83 0.55

0.45 0.24

1.20 0.43

0.77 1.18

0.34 1.13

0.37 1.73

0.74 0.44

0.18 0.45

0.55 0.57

0.56 0.83

0.43 0.29

0.51 1.12

0.12 0.37
B
C
B
B
D
B
A
C
B
C
B
F
B
C
B
B
C
C
C
B
C
C
B
B
B
B
D
C
B
A
F
559 0.62
300 0.33
C
B
D
B
A
C
E
A
B
C
A
E
1,811 0.80
480 0.32
175 0.19
767 0.51
1,420 0.95
440 0.29
1,322 0.44
570 0.53
300 0.28
1,444 0.96
760 0.51
970 0.54
554 0.37
1,021 0.45
1,040 0.69
768 0.51
1,020 0.68
492 0.33
901 0.60
870 0.58
1,242 0.83
400 0.44
1,507 0.5
290 0.19
430 0.29
1,437 0.64
1,562 0.87
701 0.47
2,111 0.94
630 0.42
970 0.54
1,843 0.82
1,380 0.77
1,146 0.51
1,270 0.85
932 0.62
1,127 0.75
951 0.42
230 0.26
1,430 0.95
2,056 1.37
657 0.73
2,086 0.93
1,141 0.76
778 0.52
331 0.37
1,616 0.72
1,981 1.32
146 0.10
1,153 0.77

0.32 0.19

0.51 Jamboree Rd NB On Loop
NB On Direct
NB Off

0.53 0.44

0.53 0.28
SB On
NB On
NB Off
SB Off
SB On
NB On
NB Off
SB Off
1,000
1,000 1,090 0.61

0.51 0.54

0.37 C
C
B
B
C
C
C
B
C
C
D
B
B
A
A
C
D
B
E
B
C
D
D
B
D
C
D
B
A
E
C
C
B
B
C
C
C
B
C
C
D
B
B
A
A
C
D
B
E
B
C
D
D
C
D
C
D
B
A
E
Tustin Ranch Rd 500
500
1,000
1,000
500
500
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
1,000 1,250 0.83
500
1,000
1,000
500
698
1,072 0.48

0.47 892
813
840
500
760
930
570
430

0.59 0.54

0.56 0.33

0.51 0.62

0.38 0.48
767
1,010 0.67

0.51Red Hill Ave
503
901
870
1,240 0.83
400 0.44
1,505 0.50
290
430
1,431 0.64
1,560 0.87
700
2,091 0.93
630
970
1,843 0.82
1,370 0.76
1,135
1,250 0.83
931 0.62
1,114 0.74
952
230
1,386 0.92
2,058 1.37
655
2,084 0.93
1,143 0.76
795
332
1,615 0.72
1,971 1.31
146

0.34 0.60

0.58 SB Off
NB OnNewport Blvd
SB On Direct
SB On Loop
SB Off
NB On Loop
NB On Direct
NB Off
SB On Direct
SB On Loop
SB Off
NB On Loop
NB On Direct
NB Off
1,089 0.36
740 0.49Culver Dr 0.19

0.29 1,228 0.55
811
365
2,688 1.19
640 0.43

0.45 0.24 0.47
Jamboree Rd 1,000
1,000 1,390 0.77
B
D
F
B
F

0.42 0.54
B
D
F
B
F
500
1,000
500
1,000
500
2,659 1.18
620 0.34
2,554 1.14
540 0.36
2,600 1.73
SB Direct On
SB Off 0.5MacArthur Blvd
Bristol St
NB On
NB Off
B
F
B
F
SB Loop On
SB Off
NB On Loop
NB On Direct
NB Off
SB Direct On
SB Off
NB Direct On
NB Off
SB Direct On
SB Off
NB Direct On
NB Off
1,000 1,112 0.74 D
B
A
B
C
C
C
D
B
A
C
F
D
B
A
B
C
C
C
D
B
A
C
F
500
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
500
993
160
672
824
516

0.44 0.18

0.45 0.55

0.57 0.42

0.26 31.5 D
F
D
E
D
C
B
D
F
F
D
E
D
C
B
D
F

0.73 1,239 0.55 1,254
1,249
651
Victoria St 1,000 1,252 0.83
500
1,000
500
1,000 1,691 1.13
500
676
257
1,138 0.51

0.45 0.29

0.53 0.37 262
1,152
1,679
178
Fair Dr
176
559

0.12 0.37
A
B

0.10 A
D
A
B
A
DBaker St SB On 1,000 1,150 0.77 558
Iteris, Inc. | 78

City Council
21 –
33 4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
RAMP

CAPACITY

BUILDOUT CUMULATIVE WITH UPDATE

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
ALTERNATIVE 2

AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR

INTERCHANGE RAMP TYPE
SB Off
NB Off
SB Off
NB On
SB On Direct
SB On Loop
SB Off
NB On Loop
NB On Direct
NB Off
1 1
1 1
1 1
2 1
1 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 2
1 1
2 1
1 1
1 1
2 2
1 1
500
500
500
979
1,243 0.83
1,741 1.16

0.65 C
D
F
1,323 0.88
1,021 0.68
1,470 0.98
1,210 1.34
D
C
E
980
1,207
1,750
1,561
990
210
1,992
770
300
1,732
950
809
881
430
640
1,445
1,014
1,119
961
824
614
601
1,215
519
150
1,015
454
219
1,377
744
991
1,190
474
1,403
1,087
1,827
2,342
999
830
400
724
250
1,217
556
359

0.65 0.80

1.17 1.73

0.66 0.23

0.89 0.51

0.33 0.77

0.63 0.54

0.59 0.29

0.71 0.96

0.68 0.75

0.64 0.55

0.41 0.27

0.81 0.35

0.10 0.68

0.30 0.15

0.92 0.50

0.66 0.79

0.32 0.62

0.72 1.22

1.04 0.67

0.55 0.27

0.48 0.17

0.41 0.25

0.24 0.69
C
D
F
1,349 0.9
1,020 0.68
E
C
E1,498 1.00
1,220 1.36
837 0.56
747 0.83
1,018 0.45
627 0.42
961 1.07
1,180 0.52
1,255 0.84
570 0.38
500 0.33
1,190 0.79
680 0.76
475 0.32
936 0.62
580 0.39
1,459 0.97
635 0.42
609 0.41
958 0.43
1,566 1.04
767 0.51
360 0.24
479 0.32
1,201 0.80
1,212 0.81
1,403 0.94
1,194 0.80
1,866 1.24
820 0.55
950 0.63
821 0.36
1,985 1.32
1,567 1.04
1,571 0.70
3,281 2.19
740 0.49
390 0.26
1,586 1.06
470 0.31
1,301 0.43
1,388 0.62
1,172 0.78
528 0.35
Paularino Ave 1,000 1,570 1.74
1,000 1,000 0.67
1,000
500
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
500

F F F F
C
A
D
C
B
D
C
C
C
A
C
E
C
D
C
C
B
A
D
B
A
C
B
A
E
839
738

0.56 0.82
C
D
B
B
E
C
D
B
B
D
D
B
C
B
E
B
B
B
E
C
A
B
D
D
E
D
F
C
C
B
F
E
C
F
B
A
E
B
B
C
D
B
C
A
D
C
B
D
C
C
C
A
C
E
C
D
C
C
B
A
D
B
A
C
A
A
E
C
D
B
B
E
C
D
B
B
D
D
B
C
B
E
B
B
B
E
C
A
B
D
D
E
D
F
C
C
B
F
E
C
F
B
A
E
B
B
C
D
B
200
1,981 0.88
770
310
1,704 0.76
960
852
830
430
640