Santa Ana City Council
April 16, 2024

City Council
21 –
93 4/16/2024

8 . SR-55 SB Ramps at MacArthur Blvd. 9 . SR-55 NB Ramps at MacArthur Blvd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC) ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 0
2 3400
0 3400
768
0 964
.23*
.28
797
0 383
.23*
.11
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 0
2 3400
0 3400
1172
0 820
.34*
.24
252
0 766
.07*
.23
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 3
f
0 0
1598
990
0 EBL
EBT
EBR
0 3
f
0 0
2136
770
0 780
627
5100 .31* 1201
837
.24 5100 .42*
.10
.15
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 3
f
0 5100
0 1010
210
0 1797
747
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 3
f
0 5100
0 522
300
0 1812
961
.20 .35* .36*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .16*
.05*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .05*
.05*.05*
.70
.05*
.64TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .63 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .75 28 . Pullman St. at Warner Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)
29 . Pullman St. at Barranca Pkwy.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY

0.5 VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL
NBT
NBR
26 642
320
144
505
97 NBL
NBT
NBR

1.5 0.5
1 115
14 20
628
57 46

0.5 1
1700
1700
.39*
.19
.38*
.06
3400
1700
.04*
.01
.20*
.03
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 2
0 0
3400
0 60 {.04}* 27 {.02}* SBL
SBT
SBR
1 0.5

1.5 1700
3400
107 .06* 42 .02
406 .14 881 .29 75 {.04} 13 {.04}*
7 95 178 286
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 117
594
90 .07
.13*
110
56 102
.06
.02*
.06
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 4
0 1700
6800
0 306
2414
456
.18
.42* 1512
55 217 .13*
.23
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 27
8 15
.02*
.00
.01
341
444
57 .20*
.10
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 4
0 1700
6800
0 57
1174
33 .03*
.18
22 2546
105
.01
.39*
Clearance Interval .05*
.63
.05*
.67
Clearance Interval .05*
.60
.05*
Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .81
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 44

City Council
21 –
94 4/16/2024

543 . Bristol St. at Segerstrom Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
544 . Bristol St. at MacArthur Blvd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
d
1700
5100
1700
89 858
173
.05*
.17
.10
266
1639
232
.16
.32*
.14
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
68 608
105
.02*
.12
.06
343
1773
226
.10
.35*
.13
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 244
1810
106
.14
.38*
112
977
164
.07*
.22
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 377
1681
216
.11
.37*
231
973
156
.07*
.22
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 172
1283
116
.10
.41*
178
856
74 .10*
.27
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
240
1528
235
.07
.30*
.14
422
917
120
.12*
.18
.07
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 184
615
80 .11*
.20
191
1263
56 .11
.39*
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
194
936
132
.06*
.18
.08
311
1677
292
.09
.33*
.17
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*

1.00 .05*
.93
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.80
.05*
.92
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 45

City Council
21 –
95 4/16/2024

719 . Flower St. at Segerstrom Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
720 . Flower St. at MacArthur Blvd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 48
413
100
.03*
.15
147
986
117
.09
.32*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 279
464
655
.16*
.27
.39
202
875
123
.12
.29*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 190
776
144
.11
.27*
94 399
87 .06*
.14
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 127
549
176
.07
.21*
23 469
63 .01*
.16
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
175
1470
249
.10
.43*
.15
145
859
119
.09*
.25
.07
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 81
1684
241
.05
.38* 1014
433
139 .08
.28*
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 95
639
82 .06*
.21
92 1545
139
.05
.50*
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 116
790
35 .07*
.16
418
2125
136
.25*
.44
Clearance Interval .05*
.84
.05*

1.02 Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .04*
.05* .05*
.88

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .91
723 . Main St. at Dyer Rd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)
724 . Main St. at Alton Pkwy.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
92 595
243
.05*
.18
.14
295
1757
647
.17
.52*
.38
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 9
665
101
.01
.15* 2113
230
28 .02
.46*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 283
1742
186
.17
.38*
151
746
183
.09*
.18
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 661
1496
20 .39*
.30
180
801
27 .11*
.16
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
172
1415
323
.10
.42*
.19
199
821
89 .12*
.24
.05
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
175
512
164
.10*
.15
.10
215
1402
323
.13
.41*
.19
WBL
WBT
WBR

0.5 0.5
1 59
3 198
119
6 477
1700
1700
.04*
.12
.07*
.28
Clearance Interval .05*

1.00 .05*

1.19 Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
WBR .13*
.05*.05*
.63

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .82
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 46

City Council
21 –
96 4/16/2024

725 . Main St. at MacArthur Blvd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
727 . Halladay St. at Dyer Rd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
40 310
240
.01 492 .14
.25*
.18
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 55
155
177
.03
.20*
90 299
262
.05
.33*.06* 1257
.14 306
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
581
856
182
.17*
.17
.11
273
394
274
.08*
.08
.16
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 284
396
163
.17*
.33
136
169
79 .08*
.15
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
324
1560
256
.10
.31*
.15
373
651
79 .11*
.13
.05
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 145
1523
97 .09
.32* 1322
100
321 .19*
.28
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
170
430
202
.05*
.08
.12
216
1724
560
.06
.34*
.33
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 243
588
72 .14*
.13
131
1661
119
.08
.35*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .04*
.05*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.88
.05*

1.00 .05*
.83TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .68
728 . Halladay St. E at Alton Pkwy.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
729 . Halladay St. W at Alton Pkwy.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
0 1
0 0
1700
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 NBL
NBT
NBR

0.5 0.5
0 10
0 251
44 1
343
.00 .00 1700 .15* .23*
SBL
SBT
SBR

0.5 0.5
0 741
1 39
434
0 12
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
1700 .46* .26*
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 16
1036
3 .01
.61*
77 781
1 .05*
.46
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 1
0 0
1700
0 2
715
43 2
427
22 .45* .27
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
0 573
365
.00
.34
.21
1 841
575
.00
.49*
.34
WBL
WBT
WBR

0.5 0.5
0 289 {.17}*
292
1 198
636
2 1700 .34 .49*
Clearance Interval .05*

1.12 .05*
.85
Clearance Interval .05*
.82
.05*
.77TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 47

City Council
21 –
97 4/16/2024

730 . Grand Av. at Warner Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)
731 . Grand Av. at SR-55 SB Ramps
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 89
382
149
.05
.10*
158
962
267
.09
.24*
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 2
0 0
3400
0 0
1029
0 0
.30* 1119
0 .33*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 309
731
200
.18*
.18
153
573
267
.09*
.16
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 0
1140
0 0
761
0 .22 .15
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
326
1299
444
.10
.25*
.26
411
530
104
.12*
.10
.06
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
201
484
185
.06*
.09
.11
273
1125
418
.08
.22*
.25
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 0
1 1700
0 1700
526
0 355
.31*
.21
242
0 258
.14*
.15
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.64
.05*
.72
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
WBR .01*
.05*.05*
.66TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .53
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 48

City Council
21 –
98 4/16/2024

3 . Newport Av. at Edinger Av. 14 . Walnut Av. at McFadden St.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
d
3400
5100
1700
770
0 194
.23*
.00
.11
994
0 398
.29*
.00
.23
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 0
1 3400
0 1700
319
0 .09*
.00
598
0 59
.18*
.037
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
0 0
0 .00
.00*
.00
0 0
0 .00
.00*
.00
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
0 1936
1654
.00 0 .00
.23*
.32
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 2
0 0
3400
0 0
383
678
0 551
388
.38* 1155 .23*
.40
.28*
.97 548
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 3
f
1700
5100
216
1550
0 .13*
.30
173
1580
0 .10*
.31
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 42
751
0 .02*
.22
42 442
0 .02*
.13
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .36*
.05*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .10*
.05*.05*
.67
.05*
.53
Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for EBR
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .49
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION 1.15
18 . Newport Av. at Bryan Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
19 . Newport Av. at Main St.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 45
709
22 .03*
.14
101
1618
23 .06
.32*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 165
623
146
.10*
.15
278
1469
174
.16*
.32
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 65
2122
51 .04
.43* 1047
33 68 .04*
.21
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 118
1907
166
.07
.41*
78 957
184
.05
.22*
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
23 24
73 .01*
.01
.04
26 29
119
.02*
.02
.07
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
131
526
305
.08
.15*
.18
252
418
270
.15*
.12
.16
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
21 36
140
.01
.02*
.08
53 75
457
.03
.04*
.27
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
217
368
16 .13*
.11
.01
253
688
39 .15
.20*
.02
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
WBR .20*
.05*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.84
.05*
.78
.05*
.54TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018
.67

City Council
21 –
99 4/16/2024

20 . Newport Av. at El Camino Real
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
21 . Newport Av. at I-5 NB Ramps
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 116
782
219
.07*
.20
206
1653
171
.12
.36*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 290
1060
0 .17*
.21
391
2060
0 .23*
.40
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 101
2135
24 .06
.42* 1055
43 96 .06*
.22
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 0
2310
640
0 .58* 1250
479
.34*
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
28 160
378
.02
.09*
.22
386
83 264
.23*
.05
.16
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 237
210
120
.14*
.10
281
291
221
.17
.15*
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .08*
.05*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.80
.05*
.62
.05*
.85TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .85
22 . Newport Av. at Nisson Rd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
23 . Newport Av. at McFadden St.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C
.22
.12

VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 0
1013
129
0 2009
155
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 25
753
6 .01*
.15
61 1696
11 .04
.33*.42*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 200
2137
0 158 .09*
.22
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 13
1969
618
.01
.51* 1137
389
26 .02*
.30.42* 1107
0 EBL
EBT
EBR

1.5 0.5
f
194
71 505
358 EBL
EBT
EBR
2 0
1 3400
0 1700
333
3 32
.10*
.02
556
4 40
.16*
.02
3400 .08* 54 .12*
489
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 0
1 1700
0 1700
114
0 95
.07*
.06
77 0
173
.05*
.10
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 1
0 0
1700
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 .00* .00*
Clearance Interval .05* .05* Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.67
.05*
.56
Note: Assumes E/W Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .62 .73
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 50

City Council
21 –
100
4/16/2024

24 . Newport Av. at Walnut Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
25 . Newport Av. at Sycamore Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 79
619
124
.05
.15* 1121
154
174 .10
.25*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
d
1700
5100
1700
218
504
135
.13*
.10
.08
468
1063
129
.28*
.21
.08
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 524
1396
59 .31*
.29
401
662
57 .24*
.14
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
d
1700
5100
1700
125
1499
91 .07
.29*
.05
186
648
246
.11
.13*
.14
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 41
532
166
.02
.21*
27 314
98 .02*
.12
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 133
43 103
.08
.03*
.06
122
11 37
.07*
.01
.02
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 180
194
156
.11*
.10
230
479
581
.14
.28*
.34
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
333
116
131
.20*
.03
.08
187
436
257
.11
.13*
.15
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.83
.05*
.84
Clearance Interval .05*
.70
.05*
.66TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
27 . Del Amo Av. at Edinger Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
35 . Red Hill Av. at Bryan Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

PM PK HOUR

VOL V/C

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL
NBT
NBR

1.5 0.5
1 11
3 125
151 {.04}* NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 106
510
169
.06*
.13
191
893
107
.11
.20*3400
1700
.00
.07
1 .04
.15253
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 1
0 0
1700
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 137
843
113
.08 130
587
82 .08*
.13.00*
.00
.00* .19*
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 3
d
1700
5100
1700
5 1905
147
12 .01*
.27
.12
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 116
684
109
.07
.23*
102
449
88 .06*
.16.37* 1367
.09 205
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
d
3400
5100
1700
123
1449
2 .04*
.28
.00
305
1929
2 .09
.38*
.00
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 148
461
124
.09*
.17
123
1141
268
.07
.41*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .03*
.05*
Clearance Interval .05*
.62
.05*
.80
.05*
.48
Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for NBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018
.49

City Council
21 –
101
4/16/2024

36 . Red Hill Av. at El Camino Real
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
37 . Red Hill Av. at Nisson Rd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
286
706
230
.08*
.14
.14
457
1287
214
.13*
.25
.13
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 4
0 1700
6800
0 12
1174
34 .01
.18* 1813
29 20 .01
.27*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 15
1306
87 .01
.27*
26 835
135
.02
.19*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
d
1700
5100
1700
190
1229
91 .11*
.24
.05
259
877
92 .15*
.17
.05
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1.5

1.5 1700
5100
98 .06 79 .05 EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 63
47 240
.04
.17*
69 132
144
.04
.16*241 {.07}*
181 {.05}
190 {.06}*
207 {.02}
WBL
WBT
WBR

1.5 1.5
0 178 {.07}*
175
17 189 {.11}*
368
24 WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 291
68 61
.17*
.08
259
98 48
.15*
.095100 .07 .11
Clearance Interval .05*
.54
.05*
.54
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.68
.05*
.78TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
38 . Red Hill Av. at Walnut Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
39 . Red Hill Av. at Sycamore Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 76
483
190
.04*
.13
374
1723
85 .22
.35*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 160
557
32 .09*
.12
686
2070
102
.40*
.43
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 133
1353
144
.08
.29*
151
556
171
.09*
.14
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 38
1583
419
.02
.39*
61 724
116
.04
.16*
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 172
633
484
.10
.33*
205
474
198
.12*
.20
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
171
80 199
.10*
.05
.12
45 37
149
.03*
.02
.09
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 2
0 3400
3400
0 257
264
140
.08*
.12
236
929
184
.07
.33*
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
68 131
71 .04
.08*
.04
42 53
35 .02
.03*
.02
Clearance Interval .05*
.79
.05*
.94
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.71
.05*
.67TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 52

City Council
21 –
102
4/16/2024

40 . Red Hill Av. at Edinger Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
41 . Red Hill Av. at Warner Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
109
340
212
.03*
.07
.12
341
1993
324
.10
.39*
.19
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 4
1 3400
6800
1700
167
612
151
.05*
.09
.09
595
1762
321
.18*
.26
.19
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
282
1293
317
.08
.25*
.19
135
508
217
.04*
.10
.13
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 175
805
190
.05
.20*
185
691
345
.05
.20*
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
260
1306
320
.08 403 .12*
.22
.12
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 3
d
1700
5100
1700
340
753
388
.20*
.15
.23
335
534
231
.20*
.10
.14
.26* 1110
.19 197
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
566
1124
129
.17*
.22
.08
305
1561
544
.09
.31*
.32
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
130
284
116
.04
.06*
.07
158
700
232
.05
.14*
.14
Clearance Interval .05* .05* Clearance Interval .05*
.56
.05*
.77
Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for WBR EBR

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .76 .91
55 . Browning Av. at Bryan Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
56 . Browning Av. at El Camino Real
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
99 151
111
.06*
.04
.07
115
204
61 .07*
.06
.04
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 0
0 0
.00
.00*
0 0
0 .00
.00*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
118
181
83 .07
.05*
.05
32 121
57 .02
.04*
.03
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
373
0 144
.22*
.00
.08
181
0 183
.11*
.00
.11
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
63 751
254
.04
.22*
.15
48 517
66 .03*
.15
.04
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 346
227
0 .20*
.07
233
166
0 .14*
.05
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
76 468
36 .04*
.14
.02
93 1398
128
.05
.41*
.08
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
0 96
124
.00
.03*
.07
0 440
482
.00
.13*
.28
Clearance Interval .05*
.42
.05*
.60
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
WBR .07*
.05*.05*
.50

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .50
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 53

City Council
21 –
103
4/16/2024

58 . Browning Av. at Walnut Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
92 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at Bryan Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
1 1700
5100
1700
156
447
98 .09*
.09
.06
550
1110
170
.32*
.22
.10
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 0
1 1700
0 1700
220
0 140
.13*
.08
135
0 55
.08*
.03
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
1 1700
5100
1700
272
1481
64 .16
.29*
.04
175
444
61 .10
.09*
.04
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 167
1026
0 .10
.30*
69 548
0 .04*
.16
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 2
1 3400
3400
1700
94 760
385
.03
.22*
.23
76 505
130
.02*
.15
.08
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 2
0 0
3400
0 0
503
175
0 1340
352
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 2
d
3400
3400
1700
283
430
49 .08*
.13
.03
227
1142
122
.07
.34*
.07
.20 .50*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.48
.05*
.67
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for SBR NBR EBR
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .73 .82
93 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at El Camino Real
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
94 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at I-5 NB Ramps
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR
VOL

PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
d
3400
5100
1700
65 600
169
.02*
.12
.10
256
1939
305
.08
.38*
.18
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 325
888
0 .10*
.17
637
2243
0 .19
.44*
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
d
3400
5100
1700
150
2150
35 .04
.42*
.02
119
647
73 .04*
.13
.04
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 3
f
0 5100
0 2136
765
0 .42* 1013
333
.20
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 76
274
479
.04
.16*
.28
69 283
159
.04
.13*
EBL
EBT
EBR

1.5 0

1.5 142
0 554
.08*
.16
277
0 .08*
5100
277 {.00}
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 194
115
61 .11*
.05
284
581
285
.17*
.25
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .10*
.05*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.65
.05*
.57
.05*
.77TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018
.86

City Council
21 –
104
4/16/2024

95 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at I-5 SB Ramps
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
96 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at Walnut Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 155
786
0 .05*
.15
523
2360
0 .15
.46*
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
90 373
288
.03*
.07
.17
566
2000
269
.17
.39*
.16
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 3
d
0 5100
1700
0 2052
535
0 SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
634
1816
246
.19
.36*
.14
248
897
312
.07*
.18
.18
.40* 1029 .20
.14.31 237
EBL
EBT
EBR

1.5 0

1.5 374 {.20}*
0 {.20}
698
520
0 .15* EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
363
699
361
.11
.14*
.21
209
343
191
.06*
.07
.11
5100
501 {.10}
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 2
1 3400
3400
1700
234
234
194
.07*
.07
.11
243
1002
590
.07
.29*
.35
Clearance Interval .05*
.70
.05*
.66
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .04*
.05*
WBR .01*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for SBR EBR TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .69 .87
109 . Myford Rd. at Bryan Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
110 . Myford Rd. at El Camino Real
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 48
80 32
.03*
.03
153
322
94 .09
.12*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 32
56 42
.02
.03*
158
139
133
.09
.08*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 132
352
96 .08
.13*
71 121
87 .04*
.06
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 211
192
227
.12*
.11
.13
138
44 128
.08*
.03
.08
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
53 866
139
.03
.25*
.08
110
777
69 .06*
.23
.04
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 38
367
205
.02
.17*
157
718
105
.09*
.24
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
109
616
47 .06*
.18
.03
100
1314
139
.06
.39*
.08
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 123
261
66 .07*
.10
61 944
284
.04
.36*
Clearance Interval .05*
.52
.05*
.66
Clearance Interval .05*
.44
.05*
.66TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 55

City Council
21 –
105
4/16/2024

111 . Franklin Av. at Walnut Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
133 . Jamboree Rd. at Edinger Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C
.03
.04
.11*

VOL V/C
.06
.16
.12*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 84
2 14
.05*
.00
.01
341
22 57
.20*
.01
.03
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 0
1 3400
0 92
0 215
0 1700 68 275
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 32
11 106
.02
.01*
.06
81 12
388
.05
.01*
.23
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 0
f
3400
0 363
0 420
0 726 550
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
452
857
289
.27*
.25
.17
122
602
132
.07*
.18
.08
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 406
1129
98 .12
.24* 1015
132
705 .21*
.22
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
31 502
107
.02 26 .02
.34*
.02
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
242
932
374
.07*
.18
.22
228
1855
465
.07
.36*
.27
.15* 1171
.06 35
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .17*
.05*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.47
.05*
.74
.05*
.53TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .84
445 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at Warner Av. N.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
446 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at Warner Av. S.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
0 3
1 0
5100
1700
0 518
522
0 1983
805
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 70
498
0 .02*
.10
91 2262
0 .03
.44*.10
.31
.39*
.47
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 628
1652
0 .18
.32*
587
905
0 .17*
.18
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 3
1 0
5100
1700
0 1815
850
0 964
831
.36*
.50
.19
.49
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 0
1 3400
0 1700
742
0 95
.22* 1064
0 .31*
.05.06 78
WBL
WBT
WBR
3 0
2 5100
0 3400
788
1 182
.15*
.05
588
0 762
.12*
.22
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .02*
.05*
Clearance Interval .05* .05*
.05*
.73
Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for SBR EBR
Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for WBR NBR
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .65 .80

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018
.54

City Council
21 –
106
4/16/2024

447 . Armstrong Av. at Valencia Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
448 . Armstrong Av. at Warner Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR

1.5 0.5
1 7
3 76
14 18
255
.01
.01*
.15
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 2
d
3400
3400
1700
102
133
49 .03*
.04
.03
140
323
90 .04
.10*
.05
3400
1700
.00*
.04
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 100
13 65
.06*
.05
49 9
21 .03*
.02
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 2
1 3400
3400
1700
47 296
99 .01
.09*
.06
64 267
94 .02*
.08
.06
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
10 314
3 .01*
.09
.00
23 606
9 .01
.18*
.01
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 3
1 1700
5100
1700
120
404
285
.07
.08*
.17
213
566
272
.13*
.11
.16
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 2
0 3400
3400
0 93
808
37 .03
.25*
71 445
68 .02*
.15
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 3
1 1700
5100
1700
108
329
47 .06*
.06
.03
200
646
164
.12
.13*
.10
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .12*
.05*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .07*
.05*.05*
.37
.05*
.43
Note: Assumes N/S Split Phasing
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .38
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .41
453 . Red Hill Ave. at Valencia Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
454 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at Valencia Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 4
1 1700
6800
1700
189
573
222
.11*
.08
.13
543
2403
526
.32*
.35
.31
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
248
487
0 .07*
.10
.00
425
2305
0 .13
.45*
.00
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 98
1779
112
.06
.37*
100
930
66 .06
.20*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
1 1700
5100
1700
0 1962
745
.00 0 .00
.22
.17
.38* 1113
.44 287
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
93 571
263
.05
.34*
.15
87 265
118
.05
.16*
.07
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 1
1 3400
1700
1700
285
60 244
.08*
.04
.14
580
311
300
.17
.18*
.18
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 1
1 3400
1700
1700
438
269
54 .13*
.16
.03
275
232
94 .08*
.14
.06
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
0 0
0 .00
.00*
.00
0 0
0 .00
.00
.00
Clearance Interval .05*

1.00 .05*
.81
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .01*
.05* .05*
.68

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018
Note: Assumes Right-Turn Overlap for SBR NBR
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .59 Page 57

City Council
21 –
107
4/16/2024

455 . Park Av. at Edinger Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
456 . Park Av. at Valencia Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 0
1 1700
0 1700
254
104
213
.15*
.13
191
75 205
.11*
.12
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 119
12 0
.07*
.01
29 3
0 .02*
.00
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
77 71
92 158
173
149
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 1
1 0
1700
1700
0 6
81 0
24 81
.00*
.05
.01*
.05
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 81
1355
141
67 EBL
EBT
EBR
1 0
1 1700
0 1700
18 0
14 .01*
.01
47 0
126
.03*
.07
.31* 1507
189
.35*
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 118
1489
65 .07*
.30
258
2140
98 .15*
.44
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Clearance Interval .05*
.58
.05*
.66
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .04* Multi
.05*
.04*
.05*

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .17 .15
457 . Park Av. at Moffett Dr.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 13
4 2
.01*
.00
32 28
12 .02*
.01
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 23
24 134
.01
.01*
.08
30 20
83 .02
.01*
.05
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 48
246
26 .03*
.16
124
469
32 .07
.29*
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 11
519
17 .01
.32*
8 295
28 .00
.19
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .05*
.05* .05*
.37TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018
.47

City Council
21 –
108
4/16/2024

478 . Red Hill Ave. at I-5 NB Ramps
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
479 . Red Hill Ave. at I-5 SB Ramps
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 384
895
0 .23*
.18
391
1547
0 .23*
.30
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 4
1 0
6800
1700
0 1059
531
0 .16* 1690 .25*
.37.31 631
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 3
1 0
5100
1700
0 1236
425
0 SBL
SBT
SBR
1 4
0 1700
6800
0 360
1281
0 .21*
.19
406
971
0 .24*
.14.24* 1007 .20*
.13.25 214
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EBL
EBT
EBR

0.5 0.5
1 192 {.11}* 220 {.13}*
1700
1700
1 .11
.18
3 .13
.16307 269
WBL
WBT
WBR

1.5 0.5
1 461
4 375
396
163
461
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
3400
1700
.14*
.22
.16*
.27
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .01*
.05*
WBR .01*
.05*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .15*
.05*
NBR .12*
.05*
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .67 .65 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .68 .79 480 . Tustin Ranch Rd. at Edinger Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 0
800
0 0
480
0 .16*
.07
.09
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 0
380
0 0
720
0 .14*
Clearance Interval .05*
.21
.05*
.19TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 59

City Council
21 –
109
4/16/2024

732 . Newport Av. at SR-55 NB Ramps
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
739 . Newport Av. at Mitchell Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 167
261
24 .05*
.06
562
993
98 .17*
.21
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 18
918
148
.01*
.21
56 1912
174
.03
.41*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
25 1185
635
.01
.35*
.37
27 266
378
.02
.08*
.22
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 131
2513
65 .08
.51* 1366
107
121 .07*
.29
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 1.5

0.5 3400
3400
459
191
174
.14*
.11
531
86 18
.16*
.03
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 161
72 34
.09*
.06
113
45 32
.07*
.05
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 29
159
11 .02
.05*
25 519
46 .01
.17*
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
0 1700
1700
0 119
67 83
.07
.09*
142
56 124
.08
.11*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .02*
.05*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.75
.05*
.71
.05*
.64TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .65
740 . Red Hill Ave. at Mitchell Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR
743 . Newport Avenue at Valencia
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURPM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 102
831
71 .06*
.18
197
1737
127
.12
.37*
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 1
d
1700
1700
1700
0 79
25 .00
.05*
.01
0 424
53 .00
.25*
.03
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 3
0 1700
5100
0 144
1347
99 .08
.28*
149
740
67 .09*
.16
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 1
d
3400
1700
1700
1519
574
50 .45*
.34
.03
617
165
6 .18*
.10
.00
EBL
EBT
EBR

0.5 0.5
1 111 {.07}* 69
144
89 EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
d
1700
1700
1700
0 0
0 .00
.00*
.00
0 0
0 .00
.00*
.00
1700
1700
94 .12
.13
.13*
.05215
WBL
WBT
WBR

0.5 0.5
1 107
99 328
61 {.04}* WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
2 1700
1700
3400
79 63
895
.05*
.04
.26
35 4
1896
.02*
.00
.56
1700
1700
.12*
.19
95 94
.09
.06
Clearance Interval .05*
.58
.05*
.68
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
WBR .40*
.05*.05*
.60

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .90
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 60

City Council
21 –
110
4/16/2024

745 . Tustin Ranch Road at Legacy Rd/Park Av
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
746 . Kensington Park Drive at Edinger Avenue
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
26 562
44 .01*
.11
.03
156
2151
180
.05
.42*
.11
NBL
NBT
NBR
2 0
1 3400
0 1700
124
0 165
.04*
.10
213
2 403
.06*
.24
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
62 1822
24 .02
.36*
.01
219
802
46 .06*
.16
.03
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 2
1 3400
3400
1700
20 33
96 .01
.01*
.06
16 51
69 .00
.02*
.04
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 3
1 0
5100
1700
0 1435
297
0 .28* 1367 .27
.18.17 305
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 58
26 49
.03*
.02
.03
178
67 163
.10*
.04
.10
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 263
1596
0 .08*
.31
255
2307
0 .08
.45*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .04*
.05*
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
NBR .04*
.05*.05*
.65
.05*
.45TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .50 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .60 747 . Kensington Park Drive at Valencia Avenue
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
748 . Armstrong Avenue at A Street
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
0 0
0 .00
.00*
.00
0 0
0 .00
.00*
.00
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
20 354
78 .01
.10*
.05
17 566
148
.01
.17*
.09
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 2
1 3400
3400
1700
157
0 171
.05*
.00
.10
178
0 115
.05*
.00
.07
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
272
351
64 .16*
.10
.04
254
397
28 .15*
.12
.02
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 2
1 3400
3400
1700
43 359
0 .01*
.11
.00
195
902
0 .06
.27*
.00
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 1
d
3400
1700
1700
16 30
4 .00
.02*
.00
52 118
20 .02
.07*
.01
WBL
WBT
WBR
2 2
1 3400
3400
1700
0 709
48 .00
.21*
.03
0 485
165
.00
.14
.10
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
d
1700
1700
1700
45 76
160
.03*
.04
.09
63 45
162
.04*
.03
.10
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .04*
.05*
Clearance Interval .05*
.36
.05*
.48
.05*
.37

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Friday, December 14, 2018
.36

City Council
21 –
111
4/16/2024

749 . Park Avenue at A Street
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
750 . Legacy Road at Warner Avenue
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 1
d
3400
1700
1700
26 326
410
.01
.19*
.24
21 399
551
.01
.23*
.32
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 1
d
1700
1700
1700
153
188
9 .09*
.11
.01
367
310
14 .22*
.18
.01
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 0
1 1700
0 1700
49 0
259
.03*
.15
91 0
609
.05*
.36
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
27 311
42 .02
.09*
.02
36 442
43 .02
.13*
.03
EBL
EBT
EBR
2 3
0 3400
5100
0 413
911
0 .12*
.18
509
789
0 .15*
.15
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
563
246
359
.33*
.07
.21
578
246
495
.34*
.07
.29
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 3
1 0
5100
1700
0 1121
97 0
.22* 1121 .22*
.07.06 111
Clearance Interval .05*
.75
.05*
.97
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
SBR .03*
.05*
SBR .20*
.05*

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .45 .67
751 . Tustin Ranch Road at Victory Rd.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
752 . Legacy Road at Park Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL
NBT
NBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
312
618
6 .09*
.12
.00
400
1420
34 .12*
.28
.02
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
24 128
2 .01
.04*
.00
17 40
3 .01*
.01
.00
SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
1 3400
5100
1700
24 1830
588
.01
.36*
.35
31 923
359
.01
.18*
.21
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
3 11
28 .00
.00
.02
15 56
88 .01
.02*
.05
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
163
21 258
.10*
.01
.15
611
115
427
.36*
.03
.25
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
100
16 7
.06*
.01
.00
78 52
21 .05*
.03
.01
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
62 180
39 .04
.05*
.02
20 71
29 .01
.02*
.02
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 1
d
1700
1700
1700
2 38
22 .00
.02*
.01
3 45
12 .00
.03*
.01
Clearance Interval .05*
.65
.05*
.73
Clearance Interval .05*
.17
.05*
.16TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 62

City Council
21 –
112
4/16/2024

753 . Tustin Ranch Road at Edinger Avenue Conne
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)
754 . Red Hill Ave. at Carnegie
ITAM 18 Alt 2 (TUSTIN ISEC)

AM PK HOURAM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C
.15

VOL V/C LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL
NBT
NBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 0
750
0 0
1760
0 NBL
NBT
NBR
1 4
1 1700
6800
1700
177
943
0 .10*
.14
.00
242
3233
0 .14
.48*
.00
.35*
SBL
SBT
SBR
0 3
0 0
5100
0 0
2160
0 0 SBL
SBT
SBR
2 3
d
3400
5100
1700
0 1582
94 .00 0 .00
.24
.08
.42* 1290
0 .25 .31* 1233
.06 128
EBL
EBT
EBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 1
1 1700
1700
1700
110
0 264
.06*
.00
.16
237
0 197
.14*
.00
.12
WBL
WBT
WBR
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 0.5

1.5 1700
3400
0 0
0 .00
.00*
0 0
0 .00
.00*
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.47
.05*
.40
Right Turn Adjustment
Clearance Interval
EBR .02*
.05* .05*
.67TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .54
Friday, December 14, 2018 Page 63

City Council
21 –
113
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Appendix B: HCS Mainline Analysis
N/A - No Mainline Analysis for Alternative 2
Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
114
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Appendix C: HCS Ramp Analysis
Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
115
4/16/2024

RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET Page 1 of 1

RAMPS AND RAMP JUNCTIONS WORKSHEET
General Information Site Information
Freeway/Dir of Travel
Junction
Jurisdiction
Analysis Year
Analyst SBM I-405 NB On Direct

BRISTOL STREET

CALTRANS
Agency or Company
Date Performed
Analysis Time Period
11/5/2018

PM PEAK
Project Description 2018 IBC TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE
Inputs
Freeway Number of Lanes, N 5
1 Upstream Adj Ramp Downstream Adj
RampRamp Number of Lanes, N
Yes
No
On
Off
Acceleration Lane Length, L A
Deceleration Lane Length L D
Freeway Volume, V F
Ramp Volume, VR
Freeway Free-Flow Speed, S FF
Ramp Free-Flow Speed, S FR
Yes
No
On
Off
500
7213
1430

70.0 35.0
Ldown = ft
veh/h
Lup = ft
veh/h VD =Vu =
Conversion to pc/h Under Base Conditions
V(pc/h) PHF Terrain %Truck %Rv fHV fp v = V/PHF x fHV x fp(Veh/hr) Freeway 7213 0.90

0.90 Level
Level
0 0
0 0

1.000

1.000

1.00 1.00
8014
1589Ramp 1430
UpStream
DownStream
Merge Areas Diverge Areas
Estimation of v12 Estimation of v12
V12 = VF ( PFM ) V12 = VR + (V - V )P
F R FD
LEQ
PFM
V12
=
=
=
(Equation 13-6 or 13-7)
using Equation (Exhibit 13-6)
pc/h
LEQ
PFD
V12
=
=
=
(Equation 13-12 or 13-13)

0.436 using Equation (Exhibit 13-7)
3692 pc/h
V3 or Vav34 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) V3 or Vav34 1360 pc/h (Equation 13-14 or 13-17) Is V3 or Vav34 > 2,700 pc/h?
Is V3 or Vav34 > 1.5 * V12/2
Is V3 or Vav34 > 2,700 pc/h?
Is V3 or Vav34 > 1.5 * V12/2
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or
13-19)
pc/h (Equation 13-16, 13-18, or 13-
19)
If Yes,V12a = If Yes,V12a
=
Capacity Checks Capacity Checks
Actual Capacity LOS F? Actual Capacity
Exhibit 13-8
LOS F?
NoVF
VFO = VF - VR
VR
6412
4823
1589
9600
9600
2000
VFO Exhibit 13-8 Exhibit 13-8 No
NoExhibit 13-10
Flow Entering Merge Influence Area Flow Entering Diverge Influence Area Actual Max Desirable Violation? Actual Max Desirable Violation? NoVR12 Exhibit 13-8 V12 3692 Exhibit 13-8 4400:All
Level of Service Determination (if not F) Level of Service Determination (if not F) DR = 5.475 + 0.00734 v R + 0.0078 V12 - 0.00627 LA DR = 4.252 + 0.0086 V 12 - 0.009 LD D = (pc/mi/ln) D = 31.5 (pc/mi/ln)R R
LOS = (Exhibit 13-2) LOS = D (Exhibit 13-2)
Speed Determination Speed Determination
Ds =
S =

0.571 (Exhibit 13-12)MS =
S =
(Exibit 13-11)

54.0 mph (Exhibit 13-12)

75.4 mph (Exhibit 13-12)

61.4 mph (Exhibit 13-13)
mph (Exhibit 13-11) RR
S =S = mph (Exhibit 13-11)
mph (Exhibit 13-13)
00 S = S =
Copyright © 2016 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS2010TM Version 6.90 Generated: 11/5/2018 11:23 AM file:///C:/Users/smak/AppData/Local/Temp/r2k92F9.tmp 11/5/2018

City Council
21 –
116
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Appendix D: Fair Share Analysis
Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
117
4/16/2024

Fair-share Analysis: Arterials and Intersections
for locations outside of the City of Irvine
Alternative 2 With Update Improvement
Baseline
Difference
From Existing From Existing
With Update
DifferenceExisitng Buildout No Future With Difference
from Baseline Fair ShareADT* Project ADT* Update ADT*
#719: Flower Street at Segerstrom Avenue (Santa Ana)
PM Alt 2 Cumulative With Update
#720: Flower Street at MacArthur Boulevard (Santa Ana)
AM Alt 2 Cumulative With Update
3,918 4,720
5,180
4,729
5,197
802 811 9 1.1%

1.0%3,542 1,638 1,655 17
Notes:
* Sum of volumes for all intersection movements for intersections ¹ AM fair-share is greater than PM fair-share

City Council
21 –
118
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Appendix E: ICU Worksheet for Mitigation Intersection
Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
119
4/16/2024

719 . Flower St. at Segerstrom Av.

ITAM 18 Alt 2 (SANTA ANA ISEC)

AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR

LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C
NBL
NBT
NBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 48
413
100
.03*
.15
147
986
117
.09
.32*
SBL
SBT
SBR
1 2
0 1700
3400
0 190
776
144
.11
.27*
94 399
87 .06*
.14
EBL
EBT
EBR
1 2
d
1700
3400
1700
175
1470
249
.10
.43*
.15
145
859
119
.09*
.25
.07 .35*
.15
.21.271 1600
WBL
WBT
WBR
1 2
1 1700
3400
1700
95 639
82 .06*
.19
.05
92 1545
139
.05
.45*
.08
Clearance Interval

TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION
.05*
.84
.05*
.97 .86
Thursday, December 13, 2018 Page 1

City Council
21 –
120
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Appendix F: Intersection Improvement List
Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
121
4/16/2024

Intersection Improvement List
Alternative 2 With Update Improvement

NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR EBL EBT
2 EBR
d

WBL WBT WBR
#719: Flower Street at Segerstrom Avenue (Santa Ana)
1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1
1 2
3 1
0 #720: Flower Street at MacArthur Boulevard (Santa Ana) 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 1
Notes:
d - de facto
f - free right

City Council
21 –
122
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Appendix G: Alternative 1 Improvement Concept Plans and Cost Estimates Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
123
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE –

ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Final
Appendix H: Alternative 2 Improvement Concept Plans and Cost Estimates Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
124
4/16/2024

IBC VISION PLAN 2018 TRAFFIC STUDY UPDATE
Final
APPENDIX H ALTERNATIVE 2 IMPROVEMENT CONCEPT

PLANS AND COST ESTIMATES
Iteris, Inc. | 18

City Council
21 –
125
4/16/2024

JOIN EXISTING

RECONSTRUCT CURB OVER

EXISTING BOX CULVERT
8' SW
13'
14'
12'
11'
11'
12'

JOIN EXISTINGSEGERSTROM AVE
MITIGATIONS: ADD WBR
IBC MITIGATION LOCATION #719
ALTERNATIVE 2

FLOWER STREET AT SEGERSTROM

CITY OF SANTA ANA

CIVIL WORKS
3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

City Council
21 –
126
4/16/2024

Irvine IBC Traffic Study - Cost Estimate
Intersections #719: Flower Street at Segerstrom
Mitigations: Add WBR
City of Santa Ana
ITEM # DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE UNIT QUANTITY COST

ROADWAY
$15,000.00
$70.00
Clear & Grub
Earthwork
AC
CY
LF
SQFT
LF
EA
LF
SQFT
LF
SQFT
CY

0.1 300
326
3,150
70 $1,500
$21,000
$8,150
$25,200
$2,450
$9,000
$1,630
$37,300
$12,600
$26,100
$5,850
Remove Curb & Gutter
Remove Concrete Sidewalk
Remove/Replace Chain Link Fence
Remove & Replace Tree
Sawcut
Construct AC Pavement
Construct Curb & Gutter
Construct Concrete Sidewalk
Construct Curb Ramp
$25.00
$8.00
$35.00
$1,500.00
$5.00
$10.00
$40.00
$10.00
$450.00
6 326
3,730
315
2,610
13 ROADWAY SUBTOTAL $150,780

TRAFFIC
Remove Paint Stripe
Remove Pavement Marker
Relocate Street Light
Modify Traffic Signal (per intersection)
Install Striping
Pavement Marking
Loop Detector
Relocate Sign (1 post)
Railroad Signal, panels and coordination
$3.00
$3.00
$6,500.00
$300,000
$5.00
LF
EA
EA
EA
LF
SQFT
EA
EA
550
2 1

0.25 600
90 1
$1,650
$6
$6,500
$75,000
$3,000
$270
$2,000
$300
$750,000
$838,726
$3.00
$2,000.00
$300.00
$750,000.00
1 1LS

TRAFFIC SUBTOTAL

UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE
Relocate Wood Power Pole
Reconstruct Catch Basin
Remove Portion Concrete Pier
Construct Concrete Pier
Remove Portion of Box Culvert
Construct Box Culvert
Relocate Fire Hydrant
Relocate Utility Box/Cabinet
Relocate Main Water Pipe
$75,000.00
$10,000.00
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$550.00
$2,000.00
$5,000.00
$1,000.00
$30,000.00
EA
EA
CY
CY
CY
CY
EA
EA
LS
3 2
7 $225,000
$20,000
$7,000
$14,000
$13,200
$80,000
$5,000
$1,000
$30,000
$395,200
7 24
40 1
1 1

UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL

GENERAL
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Utility Relocations
SWPPP Plan and Implementation
10%
10%
5%
LS
LS
LS
LS
1 1
1 1
$138,500
$138,500
$69,300
6% $83,100
GENERAL SUBTOTAL $429,400
$1,814,200Construction Subtotal

RIGHT-OF-WAY
Right-Of-Way $80.00
10%
$8.00
SQFT
LS
SQFT
4,000
1 1,300
$320,000
$32,000
$10,400
$362,400
Right-Of-Way Support
Temporary Construction Easements

RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY: $2,176,600
Preliminary Project Development (10% Construction Cost, min $300,000) Design Engineering/Administration Cost (15% Construction Cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (15% Construction Cost) Contingency (20% of Construction Cost)
$300,000
$272,130
$272,130
$362,840
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $3,383,700
4/15/2019

City Council
21 –
127
4/16/2024

MACARTHUR BLVD
(10')
(11')
(11')
11'

JOIN EXISTING

EXISTING ROW
(TYP)
13'
8' SW
12' HIGH
MITIGATIONS: ADD EBR
IBC MITIGATION LOCATION #720
ALTERNATIVE 2

CIVIL WORKS FLOWER STREET AT MACARTHUR BLVD

CITY OF SANTA ANA
3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

City Council
21 –
128
4/16/2024

Irvine IBC Traffic Study - Cost Estimate
Intersections #720: Flower Street At MacArthur Boulevard Mitigations: Add EBR
City of Santa Ana
ITEM # DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE UNIT QUANTITY COST

ROADWAY
Clear & Grub
Earthwork
$15,000.00
$70.00
$25.00
$8.00
$550.00
$40.00
$1,500.00
$5.00
$10.00
$40.00
$10.00
$450.00
AC
CY
LF
SQFT
CY
SQFT
EA
LF
SQFT
LF
SQFT
CY

0.33 110
320
3,530
96 $4,950
$7,700
$8,000
$28,240
$52,800
$153,600
$6,000
Remove Curb & Gutter
Remove Concrete Sidewalk
Remove Block Wall
Reconstruct Block Wall
Remove & Replace Tree
Sawcut
Construct AC Pavement
Construct Curb & Gutter
Construct Concrete Sidewalk
Construct Curb Ramp
3,840
4 320
2,800
322
2,720
5 $1,600
$28,000
$12,880
$27,200
$2,250
ROADWAY SUBTOTAL $333,220

TRAFFIC
Remove Paint Stripe
Modify Traffic Signal (per intersection)
Install Striping
$3.00
$415,000
$5.00
LF
EA
LF
140

0.25 350
30 $420
$103,750
$1,750
$90Pavement Marking $3.00 SQFT
TRAFFIC SUBTOTAL $106,010

UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE
Reconstruct Catch Basin
Relocate Utility Box/Cabinet
Adjust Manhole to Grade
Adjust Water Misc Facilities (Meters, Valves, etc.)
$10,000.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,500.00
EA
EA
EA
EA
1 1
3 6
$10,000
$2,000
$6,000
$9,000
$27,000UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL

GENERAL
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Utility Relocations
SWPPP Plan and Implementation

GENERAL SUBTOTAL
10%
10%
5%
LS
LS
LS
LS
1 1
1 1
$46,700
$46,700
$23,400
$28,000
$144,800
$611,100
6%
Construction Subtotal

RIGHT-OF-WAY
Right-Of-Way
Right-Of-Way Support
Residential Private Property Full Take
Temporary Construction Easements
$80.00
10%
$1,000,000.00
$8.00
SQFT
LS
EA
14,300
1 2
$1,144,000
$114,400
$2,000,000
$32,000SQFT 4,000
RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL $3,290,400
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY: $3,901,500
Preliminary Project Development (10% Construction Cost, min $300,000) Design Engineering/Administration Cost (15% Construction Cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (15% Construction Cost) Contingency (20% of Construction Cost)
$300,000
$91,665
$91,665
$122,220
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $4,507,050
4/15/2019

City Council
21 –
129
4/16/2024

Irvine IBC Traffic Study - Cost Estimate
Arterial: Alton Parkway Overcrossing at SR-55 Improvements Mitigations: SR-55/Alton Overcrossing Improvements per KOA Study, 2010 (includes widening of Halladay/Alton intersection of adding 1 EBT and WBT)
Intersection #44: Red Hill Avenue / Alton Parkway (add 1 NBR, 1 SBR, 2nd EBL, and 2nd WBL); Signalization at Daimler Street at Alton Parkway, Halladay Street at Alton Parkway
City of Irvine
ITEM # DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE UNIT QUANTITY COST

ROADWAY
Clear & Grub
Earthwork
$15,000.00
$70.00
$25.00
$8.00
$8.00
$1,500.00
$5.00
$15.00
$10.00
$4.00
$40.00
$15.00
$10.00
$450.00
$450.00
$150.00
AC
CY
LF
SQFT
SQFT
EA
LF
SF
SQFT
SF
LF
SF
SQFT
CY
CY
SQFT

0.29 1,333
1,150
8,040
1,150
8 1,150
700
11,500
$4,350
$93,310
$28,750
$64,320
$9,200
$12,000
$5,750
$10,500
$115,000
$0
$44,000
$52,500
$65,000
$27,000
$15,750
$198,000
$745,430
Remove Curb & Gutter
Remove Concrete Sidewalk
Remove Pavement
Remove & Replace Tree
Sawcut
Construct Concrete Pavement
Construct AC Pavement
Construct AC Overlay
Construct Curb & Gutter
Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping
Construct Concrete Sidewalk
Construct Curb Ramp
Reconstruct Driveway
Construct Retaining Wall
1,100
3,500
6,500
60 35
1,320

ROADWAY SUBTOTAL

TRAFFIC
Remove Paint Stripe
Remove Pavement Marker
Relocate Street Light
New Traffic Signal
$3.00
$3.00
$6,500.00
$300,000
$5.00
$3.00
$300.00
$3,000.00
LF
EA
EA
EA
LF
SQFT
EA
EA
4,550
8 2
$13,650
$13,000
$300,000
$28,750
$1,200
$1,800
$3,000
1 Install Striping 5,750
400
6 Pavement Marking
Relocate Sign (1 post)
Relocate Commercial Sign 1
TRAFFIC SUBTOTAL $361,400

UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE
Relocate Wood Power Pole
Reconstruct Catch Basin
Relocate Fire Hydrant
Relocate Utility Boxes
Relocate Main Water Valve
Relocate Utility Vault
$75,000.00
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$1,000.00
$13,000.00
$10,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,500.00
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
6 2
2 21
1 1
$450,000
$10,000
$10,000
$21,000
$13,000
$10,000
$2,000Adjust Manhole to Grade
Adjust Water Misc Facilities (Meters, Valves, etc.)
1 4 $6,000
UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL $522,000

GENERAL
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Utility Relocations
SWPPP Plan and Implementation

GENERAL SUBTOTAL
10%
16%
5%
LS
LS
LS
LS
1 1
1 1
$162,900
$260,700
$81,500
$97,800
$602,900
$2,231,800
6%
Construction Subtotal

RIGHT-OF-WAY
Right-Of-Way $80.00
10%
$7.00
SQFT
LS
SQFT
5,875
1 5,750
$470,000
$47,000
$40,250
$557,250
Right-Of-Way Support
Temporary Construction Easements

RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY (For Red Hill/Alton only): $2,789,050 Preliminary Project Development (10% Construction Cost, min $300,000) Design Engineering/Administration Cost (15% Construction Cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (15% Construction Cost) Contingency (20% of Construction Cost)
$300,000
$334,770
$334,770
$446,360
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS (Red Hill & Alton) $4,204,950
Traffic Signal at Alton & Daimler
Traffic Signal at Alton & Halladay
$680,000
$800,000
Alton/SR-55 Overcrossing Project (cost includes widening of Halladay/Alton intersection from PS&E plans) $55,500,000 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $61,184,950
4/15/2019

City Council
21 –
130
4/16/2024

15' LANDSCAPE EASEMENT
10' SW
7' BIKE

JOIN EXISTING JOIN EXISTING

JOIN EXISTING
(TYP)
2' BUFFER
4' HIGH
8' SWPARKING
SPACE
IMPACTS 7' BIKE
2' BUFFER
11'
11'
11'
11'
11'
11'
11'
11'
10'
11'
11'
11'
11'
11'
11'

JOIN EXISTING
2' BUFFER
JOIN EXISTING 7' BIKE 10' SW
7' BIKE
2' BUFFER10' SW
15' LANDSCAPE

EASEMENT
JOIN EXISTING 5' HIGH
(TYP)

JOIN EXISTINGEXISTING ROW
MITIGATIONS: WIDEN FROM 6 TO 8 LANES
IBC MITIGATION LOCATION ARTERIAL C - SHEET 1 OF 2

BUILDOUT
CIVIL WORKS DYER ROAD FROM RED HILL AVE & SR-55 NB RAMPS

CITY OF SANTA ANA
3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

City Council
21 –
131
4/16/2024

AREA UNDER

JOIN EXISTNG
10' SW
7' BIKE
2' BUFFER
20' LANDSCAPE
EASEMENT8' SW
7' BIKE
2' BUFFERAPE
(TYP) 11'
11'
11'
11'H DYER RD
10'
10'
12'
12'
12'
12'
2' BUFFER
7' BIKE20' LANDSCAPE
EASEMENT JOIN EXISTNG10' SWFDC
20' LANDSCAPE

EASEMENT
4' HIGH
(TYP)
7' BIKE
2' BUFFER
10' SW
MITIGATIONS: WIDEN FROM 6 TO 8 LANES
IBC MITIGATION LOCATION ARTERIAL C - SHEET 2 OF 2

BUILDOUT
CIVIL WORKS DYER ROAD FROM RED HILL AVE & SR-55 NB RAMPS

CITY OF SANTA ANA
3151 Airway Avenue, Suite T-1
Costa Mesa, CA 92626

City Council
21 –
132
4/16/2024

Irvine IBC Traffic Study - Cost Estimate
Arterial: Dyer Road from SR-55 to Red Hill Avenue
Mitigations: Widen from 6 to 8 Lanes
City of Irvine
ITEM # DESCRIPTION OF WORK UNIT PRICE UNIT QUANTITY COST

ROADWAY
$15,000.00
$70.00
$25.00
$30.00
$8.00
Clear & Grub
Earthwork
AC
CY
LF

3.5 6,500
5,000
20 37,000
5,750
64 5,000
750
70,000
120
$52,800
$455,000
$125,000
$600
$296,000
$46,000
$96,000
$25,000
$11,250
$700,000
$2,160
Remove Curb & Gutter
Remove Median Curb
Remove Concrete Sidewalk
Remove Pavement
Remove & Replace Tree
Sawcut
Construct Concrete Pavement
Construct AC Pavement
Construct AC Dike
Construct Median Curb
Construct Curb & Gutter
Construct Median/Parkway Landscaping
Construct Concrete Sidewalk
Construct Curb Ramp
LF
SQFT
SQFT
EA
LF
SF
SQFT
LF
LF
LF
SF
$8.00
$1,500.00
$5.00
$15.00
$10.00
$18.00
$31.00
$40.00
$15.00
$10.00
$450.00
$450.00
20 $620
4,800
23,000
46,400
120
$192,000
$345,000
$464,000
$54,000
$81,000
$2,946,430
SQFT
CY
CYReconstruct Driveway 180

ROADWAY SUBTOTAL

TRAFFIC
Remove Paint Stripe
Remove Pavement Marker
Relocate Street Light
Modify Traffic Signal (per intersection)
Install Striping
Pavement Marking
$3.00
$3.00
$6,500.00
$415,000
$5.00
$3.00
$300.00
$3,000.00
$7,000.00
$1,500.00
$1,500,000.00
LF
EA
EA
EA
LF
SQFT
EA
EA
EA
EA
LS
844
12 19
2 9,200
300
58 4
$2,532
$36
$123,500
$830,000
$46,000
$900
$17,400
$12,000
$21,000
$4,500
$1,500,000
$2,557,868
Relocate Sign (1 post)
Relocate Commercial Sign
Relocate Commercial Sign (Large)
Relocate Bus Bench
3 3
1Railroad Signal, panels and coordination

TRAFFIC SUBTOTAL

UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE
Relocate Wood Power Pole
Reconstruct Catch Basin
Relocate Fire Hydrant
Relocate Utility Box/Cabinet
Relocate Main Water Valve
Relocate Utility Vault
$75,000.00
$10,000.00
$5,000.00
$1,000.00
$13,000.00
$10,000.00
$2,000.00
$1,500.00
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
2 5
8 65
6 4
$150,000
$50,000
$40,000
$65,000
$78,000
$40,000
$16,000
$51,000
$490,000
Adjust Manhole to Grade
Adjust Water Misc Facilities (Meters, Valves, etc.)
8 34

UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL

GENERAL
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Utility Relocations
Caltrans Coordination
SWPPP Plan and Implementation
10%
8%
5%
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
1 1
1 1
1 $599,500
$479,600
$299,800
$50,000
$359,700
$1,788,600
$7,782,900
6%

GENERAL SUBTOTAL
Construction Subtotal

RIGHT-OF-WAY
Right-Of-Way $80.00
10%
$20,000.00
$8.00
SQFT
LS
EA
51,600
1 25
$4,128,000
$412,800
$500,000
$164,000
$5,204,800
Right-Of-Way Support
Parking Spaces Impacted
Temporary Construction Easements

RIGHT-OF-WAY SUBTOTAL
SQFT 20,500
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION & RIGHT-OF-WAY: $12,987,700
Preliminary Project Development (15% Construction Cost, min $300,000) Design Engineering/Administration Cost (15% Construction Cost) Construction Engineering Costs/Administration (15% Construction Cost) Contingency (20% of Construction Cost)
$1,167,435
$1,167,435
$1,167,435
$1,556,580
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $18,046,585
Note: No anticipated Building Demolition
4/15/2019

City Council
21 –
133
4/16/2024

1700 Carnegie Avenue, Suite 100
Santa Ana, CA 92705
iteris.com
© 2019 Iteris, Inc. All rights reserved.

Innovating Through Informatics™

City Council
21 –
134
4/16/2024

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
ME MORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

BETWEEN

ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
AND

THE CITY OF IRVINE AND CITY OF SANTA ANA
FOR

AMENDMENT OF THE MASTER PLAN OF ARTERIAL HIGHWAYS
The following Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is effective this ________ day of _____________, 2024 (“Effective Date”), by and between the Orange County Transportation Authority, 550 South Main Street, P.O. Box 14184, Orange, California 92863 -1584 (hereinafter referred to as “AUTHORITY”), and the City of Irvine and City of Santa Ana, a municipal corporations duly organized and existing under the constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter collectively referred to as “ CITIES” and individually as “ CITY”). AUTHORITY and each CITY are sometimes referred to collectively in this MOU as the “PARTIES” and individually as “PARTY.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, AUTHORITY administers the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (hereinafter referred to as “MPAH”) including the review and approval of amendments requested by local agencies; and WHEREAS, the CITY of Irvine has requested an amendment to the MPAH as set forth in Exhibit A, entitled “Amendment to the MPAH” , to reclassify Red Hill Avenue, between MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street, from a major (six -lane, divided) to a primary (four -lane, divided) arterial (hereinafter referred to as the “Amendment to the MPAH”); and WHEREAS, traffic analysis conducted as part of the MPAH amendment process determined that the Amendment to the MPAH would result in projected changes to future traffic patterns; and WHEREAS, CITIES have established Level of Service (LOS) “D” as their minimum acceptable LOS and an appreciable impact is defined as an increase in Intersection Capacity Utilization (“ICU”) of

0.01, or otherwise adopted by the respective CITY, for intersections currently operating at an EXHIBIT 2

City Council
21 –
135
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

2 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 unacceptable level of service; and
WHEREAS, these projected changes in future traffic patterns result s in a determination that appreciable impacts may occur in the at the intersections of Flower Street/MacArthur Boulevard and Flower Street/Segerstrom Avenue, where both intersections are located in the City of Santa Ana; and WHEREAS, improvements identified to mitigate appreciable impacts at the two intersections will be fully mitigated by adding an eastbound right turn lane at the intersection of Flower Street and MacArthur Boulevard and adding a westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Flower Street and Segerstrom Avenue; and
WHEREAS, Exhibit B, entitled “Summary of MPAH Amendment Appreciable Impacts and Traffic Share”, provides a summary of the appreciable impacts occurring at intersections as a result of the Amendment to the MPAH; and
WHEREAS, the CITY of Irvine may not utilize Measure M2 competitive funds on intersection improvements and mitigation request related to the MPAH reclassification; and WHEREAS, the City of Irvine must amend their respective General Plans and comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to finalize the Red Hill Avenue amendment per the Guidance to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways; and
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Ana is the Affected Agency, having appreciable impacts occurring within the jurisdictions as a result of the City of Irvine’s Amendment to the MPAH; and WHEREAS, the Affected Agency have reviewed and provided letters of support for the City of Irvine’s Amendment to the MPAH; and
WHEREAS, AUTHORITY’s Board of Directors (Board) approved this Amendment to the MPAH, subject to authorized negotiation and execution of an MOU with the cities of Irvine and Santa Ana for mitigation improvements on April 10, 2023. Exhibit C, entitled “Amendment to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways Staff Report to the OCTA Board of Directors dated April 10, 2023” to this MOU contains the background for the Amendment to the MPAH, as it is the Staff Report approved by the AUTHORITY’s Regional Transportation Committee on April 3, 2023, and by the AUTHORITY’s Board April 10, 2023;

City Council
21 –
136
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

3 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 and
WHEREAS, all PARTIES wish to enter an MOU to identify the roles, responsibilities, and commitments of the PARTIES in processing the Amendment to the MPAH and mitigating the related appreciable impacts;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed by the PARTIES as follows:

ARTICLE 1. COMPLETE AGREEMENT:

A. This MOU, including all exhibits and documents incorporated herein and made applicable by reference, constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of the term(s) and condition(s) of the MOU between the PARTIES concerning the Amendment to the MPAH and supersedes all prior representations, understandings and communications concerning the same subject matter between the PARTIES. The invalidity, in whole or part, of any term or condition of this MOU shall not affect the validity of other term(s) or condition(s) of this MOU. The above referenced recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by reference herein.

B. Any PARTY’s failure to insist on any instance(s) of performance of any term(s) or condition(s) of this MOU shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of right s to such performance or to future performance of such term(s) or condition(s), and obligations in respect thereto shall continue in full force and effect.

ARTICLE 2. MUTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF ALL PARTIES:

A. Each PARTY to this MOU agrees to cooperate and coordinate with the other PARTIES to this MOU and including, but not limited to their respective staff, contractors, consultants, and vendors in providing services required under this MOU to the extent practicable.

B. All PARTIES to this MOU agree to work diligently together, and in good faith, toward the resolution of any unforeseen issues and disputes arising out of the performance of this MOU. /
/
/

City Council
21 –
137
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

4 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 ARTICLE 3. RESPONSIBILITIES OF AUTHORITY:

AUTHORITY agrees to the following responsibilities:

A. AUTHORITY shall administer the MPAH, including updating the MPAH to reflect the Amendment to the MPAH upon fulfillment of the following conditions:

1. C onditional approval of the Amendment to the MPAH by the AUTHORITY’s Board.

Approval of the Amendment to the MPAH by the AUTHORITY’s Board will not become final until conditions 2 and 3 below have been satisfied.

2. Receipt of an original, fully executed MOU (signed by all PARTIES);

3. R eceipt of documentation that that the City of Irvine has amended their General Plan to reflect the Amendment to the MPAH;
B. AUTHORITY shall file a Notice of Exemption from the provisions of CEQA in support of the amendment to the MPAH.

ARTICLE 4. RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY OF IRVINE:

The City of Irvine agrees to the following responsibilities:

A. The City of Irvine acknowledges that the AUTHORITY has determined the Amendment to the MPAH is exempt from CEQA, and that the AUTHORITY has caused a Noticed of Exemption to be filed, posted, and recorded.

B. The City of Irvine shall amend the Circulation Element of its General Plan to reflect the Amendment to the MPAH, and in doing so, shall comply with the requirements of the CEQA.

C. The City of Irvine shall provide fair-share funding to the City of Santa Ana to support the implementation of the identified mitigations.

D. If an alternative improvement(s) is identified, or if a buyout option is desired, there must be agreement for the alternative amongst the appropriate jurisdictions. At the time of mitigation improvement implementation or buy out, the City of Irvine shall incorporate cost changes, which may include cost changes based on the California Construction Cost Index.

E. The proposed recommended mitigation measures are intended to bring the deficient

City Council
21 –
138
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

5 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 intersections to a LOS that is at least equivalent to the pre-amendment forecasted LOS of E or better at the following intersections:

1. MacArthur Boulevard at Flower Street: The City of Santa Ana shall add a westbound right-turn lane on MacArthur Boulevard. The City of Santa Ana shall not reduce the existing westbound lane configuration when implementing the recommended improvements. The westbound approach lane configuration shall remain as one left lane, two thru lanes, and one thru-right lane.

2. Segerstrom Avenue at Flower Street: The City of Santa Ana shall add an eastbound right-turn lane on Segerstrom Avenue. The City of Santa Ana shall not reduce the existing eastbound lane configuration when implementing the recommended improvements. The eastbound approach lane configuration shall remain as one left lane, one thru lane, and one thru-right lane.

F. The CITIES enters into this MOU in order for the above mitigation measure s to be implemented.

G. The CITY of Irvine shall fund mitigation improvements for the intersection impacts in the CITY of Santa Ana due to the amendment to the MPAH. The City of Irvine’s funding share is included in Exhibit D, entitled “Impacted Intersections Share Cost Allocation”. Proposed mitigation improvements and the estimated costs for the proposed mitigation improvements are included in Exhibit D. If an alternative improvement is identified beyond those listed on Exhibit D, or if a buyout option is desired, there must be agreement for the alternative amongst the appropriate jurisdictions. At the time of mitigation improvement implementation or buy out, the CITY of Irvine shall incorporate any cost changes, which may include cost changes based on the California Construction Cost Index or the County of Orange’s assessment of land value, to their fair funding contribution to the CITY of Santa Ana. /
/
/

City Council
21 –
139
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

6 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 ARTICLE 5. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA:

The CITY of Santa Ana agrees to the following responsibilities:

A. CITY of Santa Ana enters into this MOU to implement mitigation improvement at the following two intersections:

1. Flower Street and MacArthur Boulevard intersection – add eastbound right turn lane

2. Flower Street and Segerstrom Avenue intersection – add westbound right turn lane.

B. Widening the roadways are required at both intersections , as listed above . The improvements are intended to bring the deficient intersections to an LOS that is at least equivalent to the pre-amendment forecasted LOS of E or better. The improvement is not meant to be prescriptive. If an alternative improvement, which meets the overall objective of achieving and/or maintaining the pre-amendment to the MPAH ICU, is identified then that improvement shall be considered acceptable and shall be implemented as a substituted solution if there is agreement amongst the CITIES.

C. The CITY of Santa Ana should include the mitigation improvements in their next future CIP with an option to modify any future CIP, as needed.

D. The CITY of Santa Ana shall utilize funding provided by the City of Irvine to support implementation of the mitigation improvements.

ARTICLE 7. DELEGATED AUTHORITY:

The actions required to be taken by the CITIES in the implementation of this MOU are delegated to each CITY’s City Manager, or designee. Required actions to be taken by the AUTHORITY in the implementation of this MOU are delegated to AUTHORITY’s Chief Executive Officer, or designee.

ARTICLE 8. INDEMNIFICATION:

A. Each PARTY shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless all other PARTIES, and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents from and against any and all claims (including attorney’s fees and reasonable expenses for litigation or settlement) for any loss or damages, bodily injuries, including death, worker’s compensation subrogation claims, or damage to or loss of use of property, arising from the negligent acts, omissions or willful misconduct by any PARTY, its officers,

City Council
21 –
140
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

7 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 directors, employees or agents in connection with or arising out of the performance of this MOU.

B. I ndemnification and defense obligations of this MOU shall survive its expiration or termination.

ARTICLE 9. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
The PARTIES agree to the following:

A. T erm of MOU : This MOU shall continue in full force and effect until all terms and conditions of this MOU are implemented, unless terminated earlier by mutual written consent by all the PARTIES to this MOU.

B. Ter mination : In the event any PARTY defaults in the performance of its obligations under this MOU or breaches any of the provisions of this MOU, the non- defaulting PARTIES shall have the option to terminate this MOU upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notice to the other PARTIES.

C. This MOU may only be amended in writing at any time by the consent of all PARTIES.

No amendment shall have any force or effect unless executed in writing by all PARTIES.

D. PARTIES shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, statues, ordinances and regulations in the performance of this MOU.

E. Successors in Interest: This MOU shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the PARITIES hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns.

F. Litigation Fees: Should litigation arise out of this MOU for the performance thereof, the court shall award cost and expenses, including attorney’s fees, to the prevailing PARTY.

G. Legal Authority: AUTHORITY and CITIES hereto consent that they are authorized to execute this MOU on behalf of said PARTIES and that, by so executing this MOU, the PARTIES hereto are formally bound to the provisions of this MOU.

H. S everability: If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this MOU is held to be invalid, void or otherwise unenforceable, to any extent, by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this MOU shall not be affected thereby, and each term, provision, covenant or condition of this MOU shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.

City Council
21 –
141
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

8 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 I. Counterparts of MOU: This MOU may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which, when executed and delivered shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute the same agreement. Facsimile signatures will be permitted.

J. F orce Majeure: Any PARTY shall be excused from performing its obligations under this MOU during the time and to the extent that it is prevented from performing by an unforeseeable cause beyond its control, including but not limited to: any incidence of fire, flood; acts of God; commandeering of material, products, plants or facilities by the federal, state or local government; pandemic; national fuel shortage; or a material act or omission by any other PARTY; when satisfactory evidence of such cause is presented to the other PARTIES, and provided further that such nonperformance is unforeseeable, beyond the control and is not due to the fault or negligence of the PARTY not performing.

K. A ssignment : Neither this MOU, nor any PARTY's rights, obligations, duties, or authority hereunder may be assigned in whole or in part by any PARTY without the prior written consent of all other PARTIES in their sole and absolute discretion. Any such attempted assignment shall be deemed void and of no force and effect. Consent to one assignment shall not be deemed consent to any subsequent assignment, nor the waiver of any right to consent to such subsequent assignment.

L. O
bligations To Comply with Law: Nothing herein shall be deemed nor construed to authorize or require any PARTY to issue bonds, notes or other evidence of indebtedness under terms, in amounts, or for purposes other than as authorized by local, state or federal law.

M. G overning Law: The laws of the State of California and applicable local and federal laws, regulations and guidelines shall govern this MOU.
/
/
/
/
/
/

City Council
21 –
142
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

9 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 N. Notices: Any notices, requests, or demands made between the PARTIES pursuant to this MOU are to be directed as follows:

To CITY OF IRVINE: To AUTHORITY:

City of Irvine Orange County Transportation Authority
1 Civic Center Plaza
Irvine, CA 92606
550 South Main Street
P. O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584
Attention: Oliver C. Chi
City Manager
Tel: ( 949) 724-6246
Email: [email protected]
Attention: Luis Martinez
Senior Contract Administrator
Tel: (714) 560-5767
Email: [email protected]
With a copy that shall not constitute Notice to:

Cc: Ivy Hang
Senior Transportation Analyst
Tel: (714) 560-5684
Email: [email protected]
To CITY OF SANTA ANA:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701

Attention: Tom Hatch
Interim City Manager
Tel: (714) 647-5200
Email: [email protected]

City Council
21 –
143
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

10 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 O. Successors and Assigns: The provisions of this MOU shall bind and inure to the benefit of each of PARTY hereto, and all successors or assigns of any PARTY hereto.

This MOU shall continue in full force and effect until all terms and conditions of this MOU are implemented, unless terminated earlier by written consent of all the PARTIES.

The above understandings are a guide to the intent and policies of the PARTIES to this MOU.

This MOU shall be effective upon execution by all PARTIES. /
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/

City Council
21 –
144
4/16/2024

City Council
21 –
145
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

12 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have caused this Memorandum of Understanding No. C-3-2925 to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SANTA ANA

By:

Tom Hatch
Interim City Manager

ATTEST:

By:

Jennifer L. Hall
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Jonathan T. Martinez
Assistant City Attorney

APPROVAL RECOMMENDED:

By:

Nabil Saba
Executive Director, Public Works Agency

City Council
21 –
146
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT A: AMENDMENT TO THE MPAH
(letter from city)

City Council
21 –
147
4/16/2024

Public Works and Transportation Department cityofirvine.org

1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, California 92606-9575 949-724-7365

January 11, 2022

Mr. Charlie Larwood
Transportation Manager
Orange County Transportation Authority
550 S. Main Street
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584

Re: Red Hill Avenue – Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment Request

Dear Mr. Larwood:

The City of Irvine would like to initiate a Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) amendment request with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to reclassify a portion of Red Hill Avenue from a m ajor arterial to a primary arterial. The portion to be reclassified is south of MacArthur Boulevard to Main Street, as the roadway is currently classified as a primary arterial south of Main Street.

The Red Hill Avenue roadway segment is currently a four -lane roadway, but is identified as a six-lane major roadway in the Orange County MPAH. The City recently approved the Irvine Business Complex Vision Plan Traffic Study update (IBC Study), which showed this segment will perform at an acceptable level of service without the implementation of the six-lane roadway. As a part of the IBC Study, an alternatives analysis reviewing the Red Hill Avenue amendment specifically was completed (“IBC Vision Plan 2018 Traffic Study Update – Alternatives Analysis”, dated June 2019) and will be forwarded electronically to your staff.

We are requesting a meeting with your staff to discuss the downgrade request and begin the formal amendment process. If you have questions regarding this request, please contact Melissa Dugan, Supervising Transportation Analyst at 949- 724-7384 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Jaimee Bourgeois

Jaimee Bourgeois
Deputy Director of Transportation

Cc: Mark Steuer, Director of Public Works and Transportation MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT A

City Council
21 –
148
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT B: SUMMARY OF MPAH AMENDMENT

APPRECIABLE IMPACTS AND TRAFFIC SHARE

Intersection Jurisdiction
Peak
Hour
Buildout MPAH LOS
Difference
in LOS Share*
Current
MPAH
Amendment
to MPAH

ICU LOS ICU LOS
Flower
Street at
Segerstrom
Avenue
Santa Ana
AM 0.84 D 0.84 D 0.0

1.1%
PM 1.02 E 0.97 E -0.05
Flower
Street at
MacArthur
Boulevard
Santa Ana
AM 0.91 E 0.86 D -0.05

1.0%
PM 0.88 D 0.88 D 0.0
Source: IBC Vision Plan 2018 Traffic Study Update Alternative Analysis, Final, June 2019 * Fair-share percentage is shown for informational and comparison purposes only.

City Council
21 –
149
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C: Amendment to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways Staff Report to the OCTA Board of Directors dated April 10, 2023

City Council
21 –
150
4/16/2024

COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL

Orange County Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282) April 10, 2023

To: Members of the Board of Directors

From: Andrea West, Interim Clerk of the Board

Subject: Amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways

Regional Transportation Planning Committee Meeting of April 3, 2023

Present: Directors Do, Chaffee, Dumitru, Federico, Foley, Harper, and Khan

Absent: None

Committee Vote

This item was passed by the Members present.

Director Foley was not present to vote on this item.

Committee Recommendations

A. Conditionally approve the amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways to reclassify the facilities listed below in the cities of Fullerton and Irvine. Each proposed amendment will become final contingent upon the Orange County Transportation Authority receiving documentation demonstrating that the respective general plan has been amended accordingly and has complied with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements.

• Fullerton: Reclassify Associated Road between Imperial Highway and Bastanchury Road from a secondary (four-lane, divided) arterial to a divided collector (two-lane, divided) arterial.
• Irvine: Reclassify Red Hill Avenue between MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street from a major (six-lane, divided) arterial to a primary (four-lane, divided) arterial.

If the cities of Fullerton and Irvine do not update their respective general plans within three years to reflect the Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment, the contingent approval of this requested amendment will expire but can be returned to the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors for reconsideration and action.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
151
4/16/2024

COMMITTEE TRANSMITTAL

Orange County Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282) Page Two

If the original proposed Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment is modified as a result of the California Environmental Quality Act and/or general plan amendment process, the modified Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment shall be returned to the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors for consideration and action.

B. Direct the Chief Executive Officer or his designee to negotiate and execute the memorandum of understanding between Orange County
Transportation Authority and the cities of Irvine and Santa Ana re lated to the proposed mitigation program.

C. Direct the Executive Director of Planning, or his designee, to file a Notice of Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act in support of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment.

D. Receive and file a status report on the pending Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendments.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
152
4/16/2024

Orange County Transportation Authority
550 South Main Street / P.O. Box 14184 / Orange / California 92863-1584 / (714) 560-OCTA (6282)

April 3, 2023

To: Regional Transportation Planning Committee

From: Darrell E. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer

Subject: Amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways

Overview

The Orange County Transportation Authority administers the Master Plan of Arterial Highways, including the review and approval of amendments requested by local agencies. The cities of Fullerton and Irvine have requested amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways that are recommended for approval. A n update is also provided on pending Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendments.

Recommendations

A. Conditionally a pprove the amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways to reclassify the facilities listed below in the cities of Fullerton and Irvine. Each proposed amendment will become final contingent upon the Orange County Transportation Authority receiving documentation demonstrating that the respective general plan has been amended accordingly and has complied with the California Environmental Quality Act requirements.

• Fullerton: Reclassify Associated Road between Imperial Highway and Bastanchury Road from a secondary (four-lane, divided) arterial to a divided collector (two-lane, divided) arterial.
• Irvine: Reclassify Red Hill Avenue between MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street from a major (six-lane, divided) arterial to a primary (four-lane, divided) arterial.

If the cities of Fullerton and Irvine do not update their respective general plans within three years to reflect the Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment, the contingent approval of this requested amendment will expire but can be returned to the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors for reconsideration and action.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
153
4/16/2024

Amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highway Page 2

If the original proposed Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment is modified as a result of the California Environmental Quality Act and/or general plan amendment process, the modified Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment shall be returned to the Orange County Transportation Authority Board of Directors for consideration and action.

B. Direct the Chief Executive Officer or his designee to negotiate and execute the memorandum of understanding between Orange County
Transportation Authority and the cities of Irvine and Santa Ana related to the proposed mitigation program.

C. Direct the Executive Director of Planning, or his designee, to file a Notice of Exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act in support of the Master Plan of Arterial Highways amendment.

D. Receive and file a status report on the pending Master Plan of Ar terial Highways amendments.

Background

Proposed amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Hig hways ( MPAH) are submitted to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Board of Directors (Board) on a periodic basis. The requested amendments for the cities of Fullerton (Fullerton) and Irvine (Irvine) are illustrated in Attachment A and Attachment B, respectively. Details on the requested amendment s are provided below, along with an update on pending MPAH amendments.

Discussion

The cities of Fullerton and Irvine submitted requests to amend the MPAH as documented in Attachment C and Attachment D, respectively . Staff reviewed city-provided traffic data supporting each amendment request and has concluded that the proposed changes can accommodate existing and future traffic volumes.

Furthermore, existing, and future traffic levels of service (LOS) can be maintained at an acceptable LOS D or better.

Fullerton

As indicated in Attachment C, Associated Road is requested to be reclassified on the MPAH from a secondary (four -lane, divided) arterial to a divided collector (two-lane, divided) arterial between Imperial Highway and Bastanchury Road. This segment is currently built as a secondary arterial; however, Fullerton wishes to reallocate excess roadway capacity to accommodate Class IV protected bicycle lanes and on-street parking.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
154
4/16/2024

Amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highway Page 3

Forecasted conditions for 2045 indicate that the proposed amendment will result in Associated Road operati ng at LOS A (about 8,200 to 8,400 daily vehicles).

Furthermore, no other jurisdictions are affected by this proposed amendment.

Therefore, the proposed reclassification and reallocation of excess capacity will have a minimal effect on traffic operations on Associated Road while providing for active transportation and parking enhancements that serve local needs. Based on these findings, conditional approval of this MPAH amendment is recommended.

Irvine

As indicated in Attachment D, Red Hill Avenue between MacArthur Boulevard and Main Street is requested to be reclassified on the MPAH from a major (six-lane, divided) arterial to a primary (four-lane, divided) arterial. This segment is currently built as a primary arterial and Irvine is requesting to amend the MPAH to this existing configuration.

Forecasted traffic conditions for 2045 indicate that the proposed amendment results in this segment of Red Hill Avenue operating at LOS B or better (16,500 to 22,300 daily vehicles). However, the results also indicate that by 2045 impacts are anticipated in the City of Santa Ana (Santa Ana) at the intersections of Flower Street at Segerstrom Avenue and Flower Street at MacArthur Boulevard.

Santa Ana has reviewed the traffic study and provided a letter of support for the requested MPAH amendment ( Attachment E). Additionally, staff coordinated discussions between the cities of Irvine and Santa Ana that resulted in the development of a draft mitigation program to address impacts to the above-mentioned intersections in Santa Ana . The recommended mitigation measures include:

• Flower Street at Segerstrom Avenue – add westbound right turn lane • Flower Street at MacArthur Boulevard – add eastbound right turn lane

Staff recommends conditional approval of th is MPAH amendment and authorization for the Chief Executive Officer to nego tiate and execute a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to document agreement between OCTA, Irvine, and Santa Ana on the mitigation program . If approved by the Board, the proposed amendment will not become final until OCTA receives: (1) a fully executed MOU, and (2) documentation that Irvine has amended the general plans and compl ied with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

CEQA

Amendments to the MPAH are exempt from CEQA review. As such, if the Board approves the recommendations, OCTA will file a Notice of Exemption from CEQA for the conditionally approved MPAH amendment.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
155
4/16/2024

Amendments to the Master Plan of Arterial Highway Page 4

MPAH Amendment Status Update

There are currently 16 pending amendments proposed for the MPAH as detailed in Attachment F. Many of the amendments are awaiting local action to amend their respective general plans. Others are either under review, are in the cooperative study process, are pending resolution of issues with other agencies, or are awaiting refinement of development plans.

Summary

Fullerton and Irvine have requested amendments to the MPAH. With implementation of identified mitigations, t hese amendments would not adversely impact the integrity of the MPAH. Therefore, staff recommends Board approval of the amendments requested. A summary of pending MPAH amendments is also provided.

Attachments

A. City of Fullerton, Proposed Associated Road Reclassification B. City of Irvine, Proposed Redhill Avenue Reclassification C. Letter from Stephen Bise, PE, TE, City Engineer/Assistant Public Works Director, City of Fullerton, to Ivy Hang, Senior Transportation Analyst, Orange County Transportation Authority, Subject: Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment – Associated Road
D. Letter from Jaimee Bourgeois, Deputy Director of Transportation , City of Irvine, to Charlie Larwood , Transportation Manager, Orange County Transportation Authority, Dated January 11, 2022, RE: Red Hill Avenue – Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment Request
E. Letter from Nabil Saba, Executive Director, City of Santa Ana, to Jaimee Bourgeois, Director of Public Works and Transportation, City of Irvine, Dated January 3, 2023, RE: City of Irvine Proposed Red Hill Avenue Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) Reclassifications
F. Status Report on Pending MPAH Amendments

Prepared by:

Approved by:

Ivy Hang Kia Mortazavi
Senior Transportation Analyst
(714) 560-5684
Executive Director, Planning
(714) 560-5741
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
156
4/16/2024

FULLERTON
BREA

PLACENTIA

ASSOCIATED

IMPERIAL

STATE COLLEGE

BASTANCHURY

PLACENTIA
2/1/2023
W:\Requests\PDCS\SP\PA\MPAH\mxd\Fullerton_Associated_Reclass_2023-0201.mxd City of Fullerton
Proposed Associated Road Reclassification
Source: OCTA
0 1,000 500
FeetZ
Reclassify Associated Road between
Imperial Highway and Bastanchury Road
from a secondary (four-lane, divided) arterial
to a divided collector (two-lane, divided) arterial
?l
MAJOR

PRIMARY

SECONDARY

ATTACHMENT A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
157
4/16/2024

JOHN WAYNE

AIRPORT
IRVINE

SANTA ANA
COSTA
MESA
MAIN
DYER

RED HILL

MACARTHUR
FLOWER
ALTON

VON KARMAN
ANTON

MICHELSON

SUNFLOWER

SAKIOKA

JAMBOREE

PAULARINO
BAKER
GRAND
ALTON
Source: OCTA
11/10/2022
W:\Requests\PDCS\SP\PA\MPAH\mxd\Irvine_RedHill_Reclass_2022-1110.mxd 0 1,000 500
FeetZ
Reclassify Redhill Avenue between
Main Street and MacArthur Boulevard
from a Major Arteria
to a Primary Arterial
City of Irvine
Proposed Redhill Avenue Reclassification
MAJOR

PRIMARY

SECONDARY

CONSTRUCTED

ROADWAYS

UNCONSTRUCTED

ROADWAYS

DIVIDED COLLECTOR
?k
%&l(
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
158
4/16/2024

CITY OF FULLERTON
Public Works Department – Engineering Division

THE EDUCATION COMMUNITY
303 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, California 92832-1775 (714) 738-6845  Fax (714) 738-3115  Web Site: www.cityoffullerton.com

Orange County Transportation Authority
ATTN: Ivy Hang, Senior Transportation Analyst
550 South Main Street
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863

Subject: Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment – Associated Road

Dear Ms. Hang,

The City of Fullerton is requesting an amendment to the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH). Associated Road is currently a 4-lane secondary arterial spanning from Yorba Linda Boulevard to Imperial Highway within the City of Fullerton. The City is recommending the segment between Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway be reclassified to a 2-lane divided collector. The reclassification will support the City’s objective to provide on-street parking and upgrade the existing Class II bike lanes to protected Class IV bikeways. Attachment ‘A’ illustrates the limits and existing/proposed cross-section.

The reclassification requires lane reduction, which was determined feasible based on historic Annual Daily Traffic (ADT) data. Attached ‘B’ illustrate ADT volumes from 1995 to 2019 throughout the City. The segment of Associate Road between Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway has approximately 10,500 -10,600 ADT, which is well within the range of 9,000 to 15,000 ADT for a divided collector identified in the MPAH.

In parallel with this request, the City is making efforts to update the Circulation Element map in our General Plan to reflect the changes identified above.

Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information.

Regards,

Stephen Bise, PE, TE
City Engineer | Assistant Public Works Director
714-738-6852
[email protected]

cc:

Dave Roseman, City Traffic Engineer
Jeffrey Chinchilla, Associate Engineer – Traffic
Chris Schaefer, Planning Manager
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
159
4/16/2024

Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment – Associated Road City of Fullerton |Public Works Department – Engineering Division

Attachment A
Roadway: Associate Road
Limits: Bastanchury Road to Imperial Highway
Length: ~1.3 miles
Curb-Curb Width: 64-feet

Existing
10-11 ft travel lanes
10-ft two-way left turn lane
6-ft Class II Bike lanes
MPAH Classification = Secondary Arterial

Proposed
11-ft travel lanes
10-ft two-way left turn lane
8-ft parking
Class IV Bikeway (5-ft bike lanes with 3-ft buffer)
MPAH Classification = Divided Collector

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
160
4/16/2024

LOCATION 1995-96 1998 2000 2003 2008 2012 2015 2019 LOCATION 1995-96 1998 2000 2003 2008 2012 2015 2019

ACACIA AVENUE
S.C.L. to Orangethorpe Ave. 5,100 6,500 6,800 6,600 6,500 5,700 7,200 7,900 LEMON STREET Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 5,700 6,600 6,900 6,800 6,600 6,800 8,800 7,900 S.C.L. to Orangethorpe Ave. 23,400 - 23,400 35,600 34,400 34,100 33,500 37,600 Commonwealth Ave. to Chapman Ave. 6,000 5,900 6,600 6,800 5,900 5,800 7,600 6,200 Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 18,800 14,600 26,100 29,200 28,900 29,800 34,400 31,500 Commonwealth Ave. to Chapman Ave. 16,600 13,700 19,600 20,400 19,500 21,100 25,000 22,400 ARTESIA AVENUE Chapman Ave. to Berkeley Ave. 15,700 11,800 15,400 16,000 16,000 14,700 16,200 15,700 W.C.L to Gilbert St. 6,000 4,900 5,400 5,400 5,500 4,600 5,700 6,100 Berkeley Ave. to Brea Blvd. 7,900 7,700 8,900 8,900 7,400 7,200 8,100 6,200

ASSOCIATED ROAD MADISON AVENUE
Yorba Linda Blvd. to Bastanchury Rd. 15,200 13,800 16,300 14,000 19,400 17,300 18,100 21,300 Placentia Ave. to Bradford Ave. 5,800 5,700 5,500 5,400 7,000 5,500 6,000 5,500 Bastanchury Rd. to Rolling Hills Dr. 8,000 9,100 9,500 10,100 10,500 10,000 11,000 10,600 Rolling Hills Dr. to N.C.L 8,800 11,100 10,100 11,200 10,400 10,200 10,700 10,500 MAGNOLIA AVENUE S.C.L. to Orangethorpe Ave. 29,800 22,800 31,100 51,400 42,000 67,800 46,100 48,000 BASTANCHURY ROAD Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 21,100 22,200 19,500 23,700 24,100 26,000 28,600 28,900 Malvern Ave. to Euclid St. 12,900 14,300 15,500 15,400 15,400 16,500 17,700 17,800 Euclid St. to Harbor Blvd. 18,600 25,700 27,700 27,600 31,400 30,800 31,900 33,900 MALVERN AVENUE Harbor Blvd. to Brea Blvd. 27,500 35,700 35,000 34,000 36,600 34,700 38,100 38,300 W.C.L. to Gilbert St. 17,400 20,800 23,100 24,000 20,200 26,700 30,000 28,800 Brea Blvd. to State College Blvd. 27,400 32,200 35,200 35,800 38,000 35,300 37,400 39,400 Gilbert St. to Bastanchury Rd. 22,500 26,700 17,200 31,100 32,200 30,900 34,500 32,400 State College Blvd. to Associated Rd. 16,600 29,800 23,500 23,500 23,500 22,800 28,400 24,300 Bastanchury Rd. to Euclid St. 15,300 18,200 17,000 19,600 22,700 21,700 22,300 23,600 Associated Rd. to 57 Fwy. 14,600 21,100 18,400 17,400 17,600 17,500 17,600 20,200 57 Fwy. To E.C.L 16,900 17,800 18,800 17,700 19,400 17,600 20,000 20,200 NUTWOOD AVE State College Blvd. to Commonwealth Ave. 15,100 11,600 16,400 15,600 26,200 22,400 22,000 22,800 BERKELEY AVENUE Commonwealth Ave. to Placentia Ave. 29,500 21,500 28,900 26,800 33,200 33,200 25,900 36,500 Harbor Blvd. to Lemon St. 12,100 10,800 13,500 11,700 12,900 13,900 14,600 15,800 Lemon St. to Chapman Ave. 11,400 11,100 12,200 12,300 13,500 8,500 9,300 9,800 ORANGETHORPE AVENUE W.C.L. to Magnolia Ave. 24,800 26,900 19,300 20,600 24,600 22,200 23,500 21,800 BRADFORD AVENUE Magnolia Ave. to Brookhurst Rd. 23,900 27,200 20,100 18,900 16,700 20,700 22,700 32,100 Madison Ave. to Yorba Linda Blvd. 8,800 9,900 9,800 8,800 9,900 10,000 10,700 11,900 Brookhurst Rd. to Euclid St. 24,200 29,100 21,200 19,200 20,800 20,800 24,600 26,000 Euclid St. to Harbor Blvd. 33,600 27,500 25,600 23,700 23,100 25,600 27,500 33,200 BREA BOULEVARD Harbor Blvd. to Raymond Ave. 26,500 28,100 30,100 22,900 29,600 26,400 30,000 38,800 Harbor Blvd. to Lemon St. 14,300 14,300 14,300 16,500 17,700 15,800 18,000 24,700 Raymond Ave. to State College Blvd. 25,900 25,800 26,900 25,500 28,400 24,600 26,000 30,900 Lemon St. to Bastanchury Rd. 20,300 20,000 22,300 22,800 24,200 24,000 23,400 24,400 State College Blvd. to Placentia Ave. 24,400 27,400 25,700 24,300 27,000 22,700 26,300 28,500 Bastanchury Rd. to N.C.L. 23,000 26,300 27,400 27,900 25,500 30,000 30,000 28,900

PARKS ROAD
BROOKHURST RD Bastanchury Rd. to Rosecrans Ave. 4,600 5,100 5,700 4,900 5,000 5,000 5,200 4,800 S.C.L. to Orangethorpe Ave. 29,100 29,000 28,500 28,900 31,700 32,000 30,600 35,700 Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 22,400 21,100 22,000 23,900 24,400 22,800 24,600 22,800 PIONEER AVENUE Gilbert St. to Parks Rd. 1,300 2,200 1,500 N/A 5,000 5,300 5,700 4,100

CHAPMAN AVENUE
Euclid St. to Harbor Blvd. 15,500 17,300 15,800 21,400 23,500 23,600 23,900 23,100 PLACENTIA AVENUE Harbor Blvd. to Raymond Ave. 33,000 31,000 22,700 25,900 34,100 31,600 35,500 35,200 Orangethorpe Ave. to Chapman Ave. 19,300 18,800 16,900 16,400 14,200 13,500 20,400** 20,200 Raymond Ave. to Acacia Ave. 30,500 29,200 32,000 34,000 33,900 32,700 35,600 33,600 Chapman Ave. to Madison Ave. 23,700 24,400 25,300 26,000 25,500 26,500 23,800 26,800 Acacia Ave. to State College Blvd. 28,100 28,600 32,700 36,000 36,000 33,100 36,900 33,800 Madison Ave. to Yorba Linda Blvd. 20,100 17,300 19,400 19,800 19,200 19,500 18,400 20,600 State College Blvd. to 57 fwy. 29,900 27,000 29,800 30,600 31,200 37,800 46,300 45,800 Yorba Linda Blvd. to Bastanchury Rd. 17,400 15,100 19,400 19,100 21,400 19,000 19,000 19,400 Bastanchury Rd. to Rolling Hills Dr. 6,600 6,000 9,400 10,900 10,600 10,800 10,100 12,200 COMMONWEALTH AVENUE Rolling Hills Dr. to N.C.L. 6,700 6,500 8,700 9,000 8,900 9,200 8,600 9,900 Dale St. to Magnolia Ave. 11,000 13,500 15,400 13,800 13,800 14,000 14,900 14,300 Magnolia Ave. to Gilbert St. 20,100 21,000 20,700 21,200 23,000 22,300 25,000 25,100 RAYMOND AVENUE Gilbert St. to Brookhurst Rd. 17,300 24,300 23,600 22,000 19,500 17,200 21,300 20,900 S.C.L. to Orangethorpe Ave. 25,000 28,500 27,800 28,100 28,800 28,500 30,700 32,900 Brookhurst Rd. to Euclid St. 17,500 19,100 17,300 17,300 14,600 11,400 16,700 20,900 Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 15,200 19,600 18,800 18,600 20,600 17,700 20,800 23,300 Euclid St. to Harbor Blvd. 19,100 20,300 20,300 16,400 19,000 15,500 18,100 16,100 Commonwealth Ave. to Chapman Ave. 17,800 10,900 14,300 13,200 14,500 13,800 15,400 15,400 Harbor Blvd. to Raymond Ave 20,400 25,700 21,100 20,200 21,300 18,800 24,000 19,800 Raymond Ave. to Acacia Ave. 16,000 17,500 15,000 16,000 16,100 14,500 19,800 16,400 ROLLING HILLS DRIVE Acacia Ave. to State College Blvd. 13,900 15,300 14,000 14,300 22,200 13,100 17,500 14,400 Puente St. to Brea Blvd. 1,100 1,900 1,400 1,900 2,100 2,200 1,600 2,100 State College Blvd. to Chapman Ave. 8,700 9,100 8,500 8,600 8,400 8,500 10,000 8,700 Brea Blvd. to State College Blvd. 4,700 5,100 5,800 5,000 5,200 4,800 4,700 4,800 Chapman Ave. to Nutwood Ave. 9,500 8,200 4,900 5,000 7,600 8,100 9,400 8,200 Associated Rd. to Placentia Ave. 2,800 4,600 3,600 3,700 3,300 2,900 3,100 2,800

DALE STREET ROSECRANS AVENUE
Commonwealth Ave. to Artesia Ave. 6,100 6,900 8,800 9,100 10,900 11,000 12,200 11,700 W.C.L. to Gilbert St. 14,300 19,000 17,200 17,700 19,500 18,700 19,800 19,400 Gilbert St. to Parks Rd. 11,000 14,800 14,800 13,800 13,900 12,600 13,400 13,600 EUCLID STREET Parks Rd. to Euclid St. 12,200 15,700 17,200 16,200 16,500 15,900 16,600 16,600 S.C.L to Orangethorpe Ave. 40,900 29,700 40,500 35,500 47,600 42,000 50,400 53,400 Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 28,600 30,800 36,700 33,500 38,300 37,900 37,500 43,400 STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD Commonwealth Ave. to Malvern Ave. 28,900 29,700 32,100 31,000 34,500 36,000 33,300 35,100 S.C.L. to Orangethorpe Ave. 20,200 24,700 30,600 27,300 30,100 31,000 31,000** 35,100 Malvern Ave. to Bastanchury Rd. 17,600 22,100 25,700 23,800 27,800 28,700 27,100 28,800 Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 16,500 21,300 23,200 23,100 23,100 25,600 7,200** 24,600 Bastanchury Rd. to Rosecrans Ave. 22,000 21,000 29,000 28,700 31,700 29,500 29,700 29,100 Commonwealth Ave. to Chapman Ave. 17,500 19,000 22,700 22,100 21,200 26,100 23,300 24,700 Rosecrans Ave. to N.C.L. 12,000 12,000 19,000 30,000 21,000 19,300 20,100 21,200 Chapman Ave. to Dorothy Ln. 28,500 25,200 31,100 26,700 35,800 34,800 32,700 39,200 Dorothy Ln. to Yorba Linda Blvd. 28,100 32,700 34,500 37,000 35,300 36,200 33,900 35,800 GILBERT STREET Yorba Linda Blvd. to Bastanchury Rd. 21,800 22,000 26,200 24,400 27,300 26,000 22,300 24,100 Commonwealth Ave. to Malvern Ave. 25,100 19,600 21,800 29,100 32,900 37,100 41,200 40,200 Bastanchury Rd. to N.C.L. 18,600 21,300 23,800 23,900 24,800 23,700 23,200 23,200 Malvern Ave. to Rosecrans Ave. 13,100 10,700 14,900 18,300 20,600 19,000 21,900 24,400 Rosecrans Ave. to Castlewood Dr. 9,000 10,300 11,400 9,500 10,300 9,700 14,100 15,600 VALENCIA DRIVE Castlewood Dr. to N.C.L. 10,900 10,700 14,400 12,500 13,300 16,000 17,900 19,200 W.C.L. to Magnolia Ave. 5,800 8,200 7,400 7,100 6,600 6,600 7,100 6,400 Magnolia Ave. to Brookhurst Rd. 6,800 8,100 7,900 7,700 6,900 7,000 5,700 5,600 HARBOR BOULEVARD Brookhurst Rd. to Euclid St. 8,800 9,600 10,700 8,500 7,800 8,500 9,600 7,300 S.C.L. to Orangethorpe Ave. 39,300 41,000 38,600 40,100 44,700 49,200 54,700 46,900 Euclid St. to Highland Ave. 6,700 8,400 8,500 7,100 6,700 7,100 7,800 6,700 Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 26,300 33,100 31,200 37,400 38,000 39,200 41,300 40,000 Raymond Ave. to State College Blvd. 2,300 2,100 2,600 2,300 1,700 2,400 2,000 2,000 Commonwealth Ave. to Chapman Ave. 33,600 48,000 28,300 35,100 35,600 35,300 44,300 40,000 Chapman Ave. to Berkeley Ave. 34,200 32,500 28,900 31,500 36,400 34,400 35,900 38,500 YORBA LINDA BOULEVARD Berkeley Ave. to Brea Blvd. 41,600 32,000 37,300 40,300 40,100 43,000 47,600 53,000 State College Blvd. to Associated Rd. 20,800 22,600 25,900 27,800 29,000 26,500 25,200 25,100 Brea Blvd. to Bastanchury Rd. 26,200 31,000 29,200 31,400 31,600 30,800 33,400 35,100 Associated Rd. to 57 Fwy. 36,200 24,500 39,500 41,800 40,000 35,400 36,000 36,100 Bastanchury Rd. to Imperial Hwy. 35,900 32,100 34,700 37,700 36,900 34,200 41,900 47,300 57 Fwy. To Placentia Ave. 36,200 30,300 40,300 44,500 42,700 39,900 40,500 49,800 Imperial Hwy. to Lambert Rd. 29,700 32,200 34,600 33,800 31,400 32,400 36,100 40,200 Placentia Ave. to Bradford Ave. 33,000 30,000 32,300 36,000 35,200 34,200 27,600 33,400

HIGHLAND AVENUE
Orangethorpe Ave. to Commonwealth Ave. 7,300 7,650 5100** 8,000 8,500 7,800 9,100 11,500 Commonwealth Ave. to Chapman Ave. 5,800 6,600 4100** 6,300 6,000 4,700 5,700 5,800

IMPERIAL HIGHWAY
Harbor Blvd. to Palm St. 45,000 47,000 44,000 47,000 47,000 44,700 45,800 46,100 LAMBERT ROAD **NOTE: Denoted volumes represent traffic conditions during long-term Harbor Blvd. to Palm St. 28,900 36,600 37,500 38,500 35,400 32,900 29,700 42,000 street construction and closures.

CITY OF FULLERTON AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 24-Hour Two-Way Traffic Attachment B
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
161
4/16/2024

Public Works and Transportation Department cityofirvine.org

1 Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, California 92606-9575 949-724-7365

January 11, 2022

Mr. Charlie Larwood
Transportation Manager
Orange County Transportation Authority
550 S. Main Street
P.O. Box 14184
Orange, CA 92863-1584

Re: Red Hill Avenue – Master Plan of Arterial Highways Amendment Request

Dear Mr. Larwood:

The City of Irvine would like to initiate a Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) amendment request with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to reclassify a portion of Red Hill Avenue from a m ajor arterial to a primary arterial. The portion to be reclassified is south of MacArthur Boulevard to Main Street, as the roadway is currently classified as a primary arterial south of Main Street.

The Red Hill Avenue roadway segment is currently a four -lane roadway, but is identified as a six-lane major roadway in the Orange County MPAH. The City recently approved the Irvine Business Complex Vision Plan Traffic Study update (IBC Study), which showed this segment will perform at an acceptable level of service without the implementation of the six-lane roadway. As a part of the IBC Study, an alternatives analysis reviewing the Red Hill Avenue amendment specifically was completed (“IBC Vision Plan 2018 Traffic Study Update – Alternatives Analysis”, dated June 2019) and will be forwarded electronically to your staff.

We are requesting a meeting with your staff to discuss the downgrade request and begin the formal amendment process. If you have questions regarding this request, please contact Melissa Dugan, Supervising Transportation Analyst at 949- 724-7384 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Jaimee Bourgeois

Jaimee Bourgeois
Deputy Director of Transportation

Cc: Mark Steuer, Director of Public Works and Transportation MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
162
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
163
4/16/2024

Status Report on Pending MPAH Amendments
Page | 1
# Jurisdiction Street From To Type of Amendment Status
1 Brea / County of
Orange
Tonner Canyon
Road
Brea Canyon
Road
Planned
Valencia
Avenue
Delete The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
2 Brea / County of
Orange
Valencia Avenue Carbon Canyon
Road
Planned Tonner
Canyon Road
Delete The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
3 Costa Mesa Bluff Road 19th Street Victoria Street Delete On hold pending final consensus on Banning Ranch Circulation Plan.
4 Costa Mesa 19th Street Placentia
Avenue
West City Limit Reclassify from primary to
divided collector
On hold pending coordination with City of
Newport Beach general plan update.
5 County of
Orange / Lake
Forest
Santiago
Canyon Road
SR-241 NB
Ramp
Live Oak
Canyon
Reclassify from primary to
collector
The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
6 County of
Orange / Irvine
Jeffrey Road SR-241 Santiago
Canyon Road
Delete The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
7 County of
Orange
Black Star
Canyon
Silverado
Canyon Road
Orange County/
Riverside
County Line
Delete The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
8 Santa Ana /
Orange
Fairhaven
Avenue
Grand Avenue Tustin Avenue Reclassify from secondary
to divided collector
The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
9 Yorba Linda /
Anaheim
Yorba Linda
Boulevard
SR-91 WB
Off-Ramp
La Palma
Avenue
Reclassify from primary to
asymmetric major
The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
10 Yorba Linda /
Anaheim
Weir Canyon
Road
SR-91 WB
Off-Ramp
SR-91 EB
On-Ramp
Reclassify from primary to
major
The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
11 Yorba Linda /
Anaheim
Savi Ranch
Parkway
Pullman Street Old Canal Road Add to MPAH The amendment was conditionally approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
164
4/16/2024

Status Report on Pending MPAH Amendments
Page | 2
# Jurisdiction Street From To Type of Amendment Status
12 Yorba Linda /
Anaheim
Old Canal
Road/Pullman
Street
Savi Ranch
Parkway
Savi Ranch
Parkway
Add to MPAH The amendment was conditionally
approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
13 Anaheim Douglass Road Cerritos Avenue Katella Ave Delete The amendment was conditionally approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
14 Anaheim Cerritos Avenue Sunkist Street Douglass Road Delete The amendment was conditionally approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
15 Anaheim River Road (New
Road)
Ball Road Katella Avenue Add to MPAH The amendment was conditionally approved by the Board. Waiting for
documentation confirming completion of
CEQA and general plan change.
16 Irvine Red Hill Avenue MacArthur
Boulevard Main Street Reclassify from major to
primary
The amendment is being presented to the
Board for consideration.

MOU
Costa Mesa /
Fountain Valley/
Huntington
Beach
Garfield Avenue/
Gisler Avenue
Crossing over
the Santa Ana
River
Santa Ana River
Westbank
Santa Ana River
Eastbank
Reclassify from secondary
to right-of-way reserve
status
The cities of Costa Mesa, Fountain Valley,
Huntington Beach, and OCTA entered into
an MOU (C -6-0834). Reasonable
progress has been made on the
implementation of 19 of the 25 mitigation
measures that were specified. All
improvements are required to be
completed by 2025, at which time OCTA
will revisit the designation of the Garfield
Avenue/Gisler Avenue Bridge.

Acronyms
Board – Board of Directors
CEQA – California Environmental Quality Act
EB – Eastbound
MOU – Memorandum of understanding
MPAH – Master Plan of Arterial Highways
NB – Northbound
OCTA - Orange County Transportation Authority
SR-241 – State Route 241
SR-91 – State Route 91
WB – Westbound

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT C

City Council
21 –
165
4/16/2024

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING NO. C-3-2925

EXHIBIT D: Impacted Intersections Share Cost Allocation

The table below identifies mitigation improvements agreed upon by all PARTIES. These improvements are not meant to be prescriptive. If a PARTY can identify an alternative improvement which meets the overall objective of achieving and/or maintaining the pre -Amendment to the MPAH ICU, then those improvements can be considered an acceptable alternatives and implemented as a substitute solution if agreed upon by the appropriate PARTY(IES).

Intersection Improvement
Total
Improvement
Cost Share Share Cost Allocation
Flower Street at
Segerstrom
Avenue
(Santa Ana)
Add Westbound
Right-Turn Lane $3,384,000 1.1% $3,384,000 x 0.011 =
$37,224
Flower Street at
MacArthur
Boulevard
(Santa Ana)
Add Eastbound
Right-Turn Lane $4,507,000 1.0% $4,507,000 x 0.01 =
$45,070

City Council
21 –
166
4/16/2024

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/public-works
Item # 22
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Fire Station 75 Fuel System Replacement

AGENDA TITLE
Award a Construction Contract to Fleming Environmental, Inc. for the Fire Station 75 Fuel System Replacement (Project No. 22-6020) (General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1.Award a construction contract to Fleming Environmental, Inc. in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $584,667, subject to change orders (not to exceed 25% of the base bid amount) in accordance with the Greenbook: Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, for fuel system replacement at Fire Station 75 for the term beginning upon execution of the contract and ending upon project completion, and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.

2. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $818,534, which includes $584,667 for the construction contract, $87,700 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and a $146,167 project contingency for unanticipated or unforeseen work.

3. Approve an amendment to the FY 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program to include $818,534 in construction funding approved in FY 2021-22 and 2022-23 proposed budget for the Fire Station.

4. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2024-14 was filed for project 22-6020.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency’s Parks, Fleet, and Facilities team maintains most City facilities, including ten Orange County fire stations. After assessing the fire facilities, it was identified that the underground fuel storage tank at Fire Station 75 was in need of removal and installation of a new above ground storage tank due to the environmental condition of the subsurface soils in the vicinity of the existing underground tanks. The upgraded fuel system and tanks will meet South Coast Air Quality Management District

City Council
22 –
1 4/16/2024

Fire Station 75 Fuel System Replacement
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 5
requirements, with adherence to the most recent fire code related to setbacks and existing structures.

The scope of work includes installing one 2,000-gallon diesel fuel underground storage tank on engineering reinforced slab, install one new dispenser, design and construct a new canopy, install a new diesel exhaust fluid (def) tank and dispensing system, and remove the existing 4,000-gallon diesel/gasoline fuel underground storage tank and corresponding dispenser.

Public Outreach and Contractor Participation
To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 1,968 regional vendors via PlanetBids, several of which are Santa Ana based. A total of four bids were received. No bids were received from any Santa Ana contractors.

As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on February 1, 2024 and February 5, 2024. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids on January 9, 2024. Bids were received electronically via Planetbids on February 28, 2024. No bid protest was submitted by any of the bidders during the bid protest period.

Bid Results Summary
Rank Bidder’s Name Location Base Bid
1 Fleming Environmental Inc. Fullerton, CA $584,667
2 GEMS Environmental Management Services Concord, CA $746,658 3 Metro Builders & Engineers Group Newport Beach,
CA
$750,211
4 EEC Environmental Orange, CA $920,813
A total of four bids were received and all were deemed responsive. Fleming Environmental, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive base bid in the amount of $584,667 (Exhibit 2). As specified in the bid documents, the lowest bid shall be determined on the basis of the base bid. Based on the bid analysis and a contractor’s reference check, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Fleming Environmental Inc. in the amount of the base bid totaling $584,667 (Exhibit 3). This Southern California contractor specializes in underground and above-ground storage tanks, tank compliance testing, and designated operators. They have previously constructed new propane fueling stations at the City of Santa Ana Corporate Yard and constructed the Maple Street Bike Storm Drain CDS Project.

Project Delivery
To deliver a complete project, in addition to the construction contract, the estimated total project delivery cost includes construction administration, inspection, and testing, along with an allowance for contingencies to account for unexpected or unforeseen

City Council
22 –
2 4/16/2024

Fire Station 75 Fuel System Replacement
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 5
conditions. Construction administration and inspection includes construction management and implementation of the labor requirements.

As indicated in the Cost Analysis (Exhibit 4) and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $818,534.

Project Item Total
Construction Contract Bid Amount $ 584,667
Construction Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 87,700 Project Contingencies $ 146,167
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY COST $ 818,534

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Review No. ER-2024-14 was filed for the project 22-6020.

FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $818,534, which includes construction, contract administration, inspection, and testing, and authorized contingencies of $146,167. All funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2023-24, however any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for approval of Carryovers to Fiscal Year 2024-2025.

The proposed contract enables staff to authorize change orders (not to exceed 25% of the base bid) in accordance with the Greenbook: Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, if necessary, for contingencies. Staff expects to utilize other available Public Works appropriations if a contingency becomes necessary to complete the project. If there are no other available appropriations, then Staff will return to City Council with a project update and recommendations.

The following table summarizes the funds budgeted for expenditure to deliver construction of this project:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
2023-24
01115330-
62300
(22-6020)
Fire
Suppression
Fire Suppression –
Contract Services -
Professional
818,534
Total $818,534

City Council
22 –
3 4/16/2024

Fire Station 75 Fuel System Replacement
April 16, 2024

4 1
7 5

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Location Map

2. Bid Proposal

3. Construction Contract

4. Cost Analysis

5. Capital Improvement Project Worksheet
Submitted By: Nabil Saba, P.E., Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
22 –
4 4/16/2024

PWA

SANTA ANA

PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 22-6020:

Fire Station 75
120 W. Walnut Santa Ana, Ca. 92701
Exhibit 1
Project Location
Exhibit 1

City Council
22 –
5 4/16/2024

Exhibit 2

City Council
22 –
6 4/16/2024

City Council
22 –
7 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT 3

City Council
22 –
8 4/16/2024

City Council
22 –
9 4/16/2024

City Council
22 –
10 4/16/2024

City Council
22 –
11 4/16/2024

City Council
22 –
12 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT 4
Construction Contract 584,667.00$
Contract Administration, Inspection and Testing 87,700.00$ Contingencies 146,167.00$
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS 818,534.00$
CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT NO. 22-6020: FS 75 Underground Storage Tank Replacement

COST ANALYSIS

City Council
22 –
13 4/16/2024

CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 23/24CIP

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Underground storage tank removal and the installation of an above ground tank fuel station at Fire Station 75.

PROJECT NEED:

The underground storage tank is in need of removal due to environmental condition of the subsurface soils in the vicinity of the existing underground tanks. The upgraded fuel systems and tanks will meet South Coast AQMD, with adherence to most recent fire code related to setbacks and existing structures.

PROJECT TITLE:

Fire Station 75 Above Ground
Storage Tank
PROJECT CATEGORY:

City & Park Facility Improvements
Municipal Facilities

LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:

Public Works Parks, Fleet & Facilities Mike Ortiz, Senior Civil Engineer 25-Mar-2024

PROJECT COSTS
Total
Project
Cost FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 Construction 903,833 903,833 - - - - - -
Contingency 146,167 146,167 - - - - - -
TOTAL 1,050,000 1,050,000 - - - - - -

SOURCE OF FUNDS
Total
Project
Cost FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 GENERAL FUND 1,050,000 1,050,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 1,050,000 1,050,000 - - - - - -
Exhibit 5

City Council
22 –
14 4/16/2024

Community Development Agency
www.santa-ana.org/community-development
Item # 23
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Security Services for Santa Ana Navigation Center

AGENDA TITLE
Amendment to Agreement with Protection America Inc. to Provide Security Services at Transportation Drop-Off and Pick-Up Locations Used for Santa Ana Navigation Center Guests

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a first amendment to the agreement with Protection America Inc. to provide security services at the drop-off and pick-up locations used by the Santa Ana Navigation Center to extend the term until June 30, 2025 and to add an additional $117,308, for a total amount not to exceed $167,308 (Agreement No.

A-2024-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
In May, 2022, the Santa Ana Navigation Center opened its doors and Protection America Inc. was contracted by Illumination Foundation to provide on-site security services. At that time, no additional security was utilized for transportation services.

Once City staff became aware of community concerns regarding loitering and unwanted behavior at the drop-off and pick-up location utilized by the Navigation Center, additional security service was retained. To provide consistency of Navigation Center rules and procedures, the City also contracted with Protection America Inc. for a six- month pilot program. During the pilot period, it was found that the presence of security staff at this location reduced calls for concerns and eliminated loitering and trash.

Under the terms of the City’s agreement with Protection America Inc., a security guard is placed at the shuttle location, 12 hours a day, six days a week to engage with clients disembarking/awaiting the Navigation Center shuttle and ensures that these clients do not loiter, engage in criminal activity, or cause issues or concerns for surrounding businesses. The security officers patrol the surrounding area, report hourly with multiple pictures of different areas of the site, maintain overall visibility on the site, monitor any activity, and observe and report daily to the City. The City’s Good Neighbor Policy indicates that clients are not allowed to walk in or walk off the Navigation Center property. Therefore, transportation services continue to be an important component to

City Council
23 –
1 4/16/2024

Security Services for Santa Ana Navigation Center
April 16, 2024

4 1
6 2
the success of the Navigation Center’s overall program. An amendment to the contract will update the services, increase the compensation, and extend the existing agreement for off-site security services through June 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are available for expenditure in the FY 2023-24 budget and will be carried forward into the FY 2024-25 budget. The table below indicates the estimated expenditures by fiscal year.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit-Account
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description
Amount
FY 23-24 12218717-
62300
Emergency and
Health Grants
HHAP 3 –
Payment to Subagent
$66,667.00
FY 24-25 12218717-
62300
Emergency and
Health Grants
HHAP 4 –
Payment to Subagent
$100,641.00
Total $167,308.00

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Amendment to Agreement with Protection America Inc.

Submitted By: Michael L. Garcia, Executive Director of Community Development Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
23 –
2 4/16/2024

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH PROTECTION AMERICA, INC.

TO PROVIDE SECURITY SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) to the above-referenced agreement is entered into on April 16, 2024 by and between Protection America, Inc. , a California corporation (“Contractor”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS
A. The parties entered into Agreement No. N-2023-264 (“Agreement”) dated October 20, 2023 to provide security services for the City at multiple locations, including at and around the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center . The initial term of the Agreement runs through April 20, 2024, with the option to grant up to two (2) one (1) year extensions to the term of the Agreement. The Agreement is current and in-effect.

B. The parties wish to amend the Agreement to update the scope of services and increase the total not-to-exceed amount to the compensation reflective of the parties’ intent to exercise the option to extend the term of the Agreement. No further terms are contemplated by this Amendment.

The Parties therefore agree:

1. Section 1, Scope of Services, is amended to replace Exhibit A with the Scope of Services provided by the Consultant, dated February 16, 2024, and attached hereto as Exhibit A -1 to this First Amendment.

2. Section 2.a., Compensation, is hereby amended to increase the compensation by $117,308.00. The total amount to be expended during the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $167,308.00.

3. Section 3, Term, is hereby extended, by operation of the extensions available unde r the terms of the Agreement, through June 30, 2025.

4. Except as modified by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement , shall remain in full force and effect.
[signature page to follow]
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
3 4/16/2024

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.

ATTEST
_______________________________
Jennifer L. Hall
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM

CITY OF SANTA ANA
______________________________
Alvaro Nuñez
Acting City Manager

CONTRACTOR
SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: ___________________________ _______________________________ Andrea Garcia-Miller By:

Assistant City Attorney Title:

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
____________________________
Michael Garcia
Executive Director
Community Development Agency
Ahmed Ali
CEO
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
4 4/16/2024

Index
• Pricing For City of
Santa Ana
• Scope of Work
• Introduction
• SilverTrac Technology
• Insurance Policies
• Sample Incident Report
Exhibit A-1 to the
First Amendment
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
5 4/16/2024

PROPOSAL FOR UNARMED SECURITY GUARD

1. City of Santa Ana - Multiple
locations (location may change during the contract period)

2. Pricing / Service hours a. 9 am to 9 pm One on site Unarmed Guard 6 days a week with Thursdays off (hours and day of the week off may change during the contract period)
b. Service duration to be determined
c. Pricing: $26 per hour
d. 72 billable hours per week
e. Monthly cost based on 30 day months $8,022
f. Invoices to be sent every 1st and 16th of the
month and due within net 15 days
ADDENDUM 1A (Contract Extension 5/1/24-6/30/25)
DATE: 2/16/24
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
6 4/16/2024

Protection America, Inc. will provide a fully operational Guard Touring GPS monitoring and reporting system at no additional cost. On site officers will patrol property, report hourly with multiple pictures of different areas of the sites, report any City maintenance issues, maintain overall visibility on site. Written post orders will be completed by our Account Manager prior commencing service. We will provide 24 hour manned Dispatch Center. Company iPhone with our guard touring system, picture and email capability to provide instantaneous reports to our client at the time of any occurrence. Supervisors will spot check security officers on duty at random and unannounced periodically during each week. Fully credentialed by Compliance Depot, Net Vendor, RMIS. $2 Million General Liability insurance and $1 Million Workers Compensation insurance. Contract can be terminated with 30 day notice of cancellation.

Quoted by: Ed Clay Date:2/13/24
Accepted by: _______________________ Date:

THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTEREST

SECURITY SCOPE OF WORK
• Officer will patrol at minimum every 30 minutes throughout the shift. • The objective of the officer(s) is ensure City clients do not remain in specific areas, do not loiter, do not commit criminal acts and clients abide by all rules and laws pertaining to private property. All guards actions will be completed via an Observe and Report model. to keep a visual on the clients, monitor their activity and observe and report.
• Officer will monitor Illumination Foundation clients to deter congregating, sleeping, hanging out, fraternizing, and/or conducting illegal activities while in the vicinity. Security will contact Illumination Foundation to seek rule compliance with clients and/ or Santa Ana PD if violations are observed. • Officer will monitor Illumination Foundation clients to confirm if they disburse after being dropped off.

In the event that they don't, Illumination Foundation will notified. • Any violation or sign of misconduct will be reported to the City agent and Illumination Foundation management.
• Officer will provide a presence by making visible rounds and patrols. • Officer will contract property managers and/or representatives of specific identified properties adjacent to the identified location no less than One (1) time per day to ensure lines of communication between the effected property manager, the City of Santa Ana, the Illumination Foundation and the Santa Ana Police Department remain open and that all issues and concerns are brought forward the the responsible party as soon as possible.
• Officer will not physically escort anyone as this is an "observe and report" posting. • If a situation escalates, officer will contact Santa Ana PD immediately. • Locations to drop off/pick up can alternate and guard will have to report to the designated location for that day.

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
7 4/16/2024

Welcome!
Thank you for taking the time to take a look at Protection America Security’s Guard Management Technology! We
are really thankful for the opportunity to share our hard work and passion with you!
Here’s a brief overview of how Protection America
Security’s unique software utilizes the latest technologies and integrates them into practical and functional
solutions that will make your job easier.

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
8 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
9 4/16/2024

How We Report
We use smart phones and tablets with quick and simple drop down reporting menus to streamline the reporting, maximize on site visibility, and reduce your risk and liability.

Instead of traditional hand written DARs our officers are provided varied reporting options that enable them to report easily throughout their shift.
• Issue types can be completely customize
d and worded for
your industry and specific property.
• At your choosing any issues or incidents reported can trigger a notification to the necessary parties (i.e.
manager
s, maintenance supervisors or teams, and issue
specific vendors).
• All issues are prioritized based on the scope of service at each property and according to your needs.

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
10 4/16/2024

Guard Tour Checkpoints
When a checkpoint is scanned 4 things happen:
1) Instructions are shown to the officer specific to that location 2) A pre-written note in risk and liability terms is entered into all reports including the Daily Activity Report (DAR).
3) A GPS pinpoint is taken to track the officers location at the time of the scan
4) The officer is required to include a photo with the checkpoint to verify their location (optional)
QR Codes Bar
Codes
NFC Tags
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
11 4/16/2024

Receiving a Task or Reminder
Our dispatch center can communicate with our officers in the field through Silvertrac’s dispatch system.

Tasks can be sent as one-time, manually dispatched issues, or as recurring tasks to remind officers of specific items on a consistent schedule. Of course, all of this is included in the the DAR.

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
12 4/16/2024

Daily Activity Report
Notes:
• Color coded based on Issue Priority
• Can be filtered by issue level, address, property, group, security, maintenance, or parking
• Can be sent automatically to you based on a customized schedule.

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
13 4/16/2024

Incident Report
Notes:
• Incident reports are automatically generated for each issue. • Administrators can add additional notes and email the issue directly to you from the system.
• Notifications can be added based on each issue type to notify necessary parties when incidents do occur.

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
14 4/16/2024

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?

INSR ADDL SUBR

LTR INSD WVD

PRODUCER CONTACT
NAME:

FAXPHONE
(A/C, No):(A/C, No, Ext):

E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

INSURER A :

INSURED INSURER B :

INSURER C :

INSURER D :

INSURER E :

INSURER F :

POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXPTYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY

UMBRELLA LIAB

EXCESS LIAB

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
EACH OCCURRENCE $
DAMAGE TO RENTEDCLAIMS-MADE OCCUR $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) MED EXP (Any one person) $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $

PRO-POLICY LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGGJECT
OTHER: $

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
$(Ea accident)
ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $

OWNED SCHEDULED
BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $AUTOS ONLY AUTOS

HIRED NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE
$AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY (Per accident)
$

OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE
CLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $
DED RETENTION $

PER OTH-

STATUTE ER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMITDESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
Y / N
N / A
(Mandatory in NH)

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.ACORD 25 (2016/03)

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE

DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
$
$
$
$
$
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
PROTE24 OP ID: AC
05/02/2022
Central Insurance Agency, Inc
Central Insurance Agency, Inc.
93 East Main Street
Smithtown, NY 11787
George Gavaris
877-242-9600 877-243-8995
Employers Compensation Ins.

Peleus Insurance Company
Protection America Inc.

PPO#120313
21350 Nordhoff St # 104C
Chatsworth, CA 91311
Sentinel Insurance Company
United Financial Casualty
B X 1,000,000
X X GLV0001152 09/19/2021 09/19/2022 100,000
X 5,000
X 1,000,000
2,000,000
X 2,000,000
1,000,000D
X 041698621 04/08/2022 10/08/2022
X X
XA
EIG2562084-04 11/06/2021 11/06/2022 1,000,000
Y 1,000,000
1,000,000
C 91SBAVL2993 04/26/2022 04/26/2023 Contents 10,500
Bureau of Security and Investigation is included as an additional insured under the general liability with respect to the liability created by the negligent acts, errors and omissions of the named insured herein as required by written contract. 30 day notice of cancellation will be sent out in the event of any change in coverage limits or cancellation to the policy.

BUREAUS
Bureau of Security and
Investigative Services
PO Box 980550
West Sacramento, CA 95798
877-242-9600
11512
34118
11000
11770
Errors & Omission
Assault & Battery
Property
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
15 4/16/2024

Security Report #463500389
Protection America, Inc.

Thu 10/1/2020 12:35 AM - BVPATROL
Problem Unit
Problem Address
Assigned By
6150 De Soto Avenue

BVPATROL
6150 De Soto AvenueReported Address
Reported Unit
Additional Details
Issue Timeline
Created
Assigned To
Acknowledged
Arrived At
Closed

BVPATROL

BVPATROL

BVPATROL

BVPATROL

BVPATROL
Thu 10/01/20 12:30 AM
Thu 10/01/20 12:30 AM
Thu 10/01/20 12:30 AM
Thu 10/01/20 12:35 AM
Thu 10/01/20 12:30 AM
Location
Property
Default
Bella Vista
6150 De Soto Avenue
Woodland Hills , CA 91367
Trespassers/Transients
Issue Type
Status
Closed
6150 De Soto Avenue
Reported By
Thu 10/1/2020 12:35 AM - BVPATROL
Notes
I found a group of males inside of this white Nissan Altima, I observed the vehicle sneak into the premises behind another car.

I followed vehicle all the way to roof access point on 6000 de soto exit on Erwin st males had no explanation of why they even entered the premises, males seem extremely confused and were not able to keep their story straight, I proceeded to request valid form of ID to be allowed to exit the premises to prevent them returning and also to be able to have proper information of the owner of the vehicle. vehicle was successfully removed from the premises with no further incident or disturbances. all areas are now clear and secured
Thu 10/1/2020 12:35 AM - BVPATROL
Report Run 10/2/2020 3:46:37 PM Page 1 of 2
© Copyright 2020 SilverTrac Software, Inc.

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
23 –
16 4/16/2024

Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency
www.santa-ana.org/parks-recreation
Item # 24
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Event Security Services

AGENDA TITLE
First Amendment with Patrol Solutions, LLC for Event Security Services at City Events to Update the Rates and Amend Compensation Terms from Annual Amounts to Total Not to Exceed Amount of $450,000 for the Entirety of the Agreement

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute a first amendment to the agreement with Patrol Solutions, LLC for event security services at City Events to update the rates and amend the compensation terms from annual amounts to total not to exceed amount of $450,000 for the entirety of the agreement (Agreement No. A-2024-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
On April 5, 2022, the City of Santa Ana awarded an agreement to Patrol Solutions, LLC for event security services at City Events. The award was made through a request for proposal process where Patrol Solutions, LLC was selected.

The amount and size of City Events have grown since the execution of the original agreement resulting in a change in the type of security needs. City staff has determined that certain events such as the Summer Concert Series, Mid-Autumn Festival, and Movies in the Park require less time and coordination on the part of the vendor as would events like Fiestas Patrias, Chicano Heritage Festival, and Fourth of July. Therefore, City Staff is recommending the implementation of a new rate structure for Standard and Premium events. In addition, there is a need for a CPI adjustment to the rates due to inflation increases. While the rates are increasing, with the amendment of the compensation to remove annual amounts and allow a total amount not to exceed $450,000 over the entire term of the agreement, there is sufficient contract authority under the existing agreement to continue through the end of the agreement term of March 31, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT
As of the end of the Winter Village event, the City has paid the vendor $297,676.28 on this agreement and $152,323.72 is available to use. The City is estimating to spend $12,500 for the remainder of fiscal year 2023-2024. Any remaining agreement balance

City Council
24 –
1 4/16/2024

Event Security Services
April 16, 2024

4 1
6 2
at the end of the fiscal year may be used in fiscal year 2024-2025. Funding for the balance will be budgeted and made available as part of the City-wide budget process, pending City Council approval. There is no fiscal impact associated to the action as the amendment to the compensation to remove the annual amounts and allow a total amount not to exceed $450,000 over the entire term of the agreement will result in a zero dollar increase to the agreement total.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Agreement Amendment
Submitted By: Hawk Scott, Executive Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
24 –
2 4/16/2024

FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH PATROL SOLUTIONS, LLC, TO

PROVIDE SECURITY SERVICES TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to the above-referenced agreement is entered into on April 16, 2024, by and between Patrol Solutions, LLC, a California limited liability company (“Contractor”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS

A. Following Request for Proposal (“RFP”) No. 21-139, the parties entered into Agreement No. A-2022-047 (“Agreement”) dated April 5, 2022, to retain a qualified contractor to provide security services for various events for the City’s Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency.

B. The Agreement is in full force and effect through March 31, 2025.

C. The parties now wish to amend the Agreement to remove the annual compensation language in favor of a total Agreement amount and provide an updated rate sheet.

The Parties therefore agree:

1. Section 2.a., Compensation, is hereby amended to read in its entirety:

City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum compensation to Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit B-1, attached hereto and incorporated by reference. The total compensation for services provided under RFP 21-139 shall not exceed Four Hundred, Fifty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($450,000).

2. Except as modified by this First Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

[signature page follows]

City Council
24 –
3 4/16/2024

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH PATROL

SOLUTIONS, LLC, TO PROVIDE SECURITY SERVICES TO

THE CITY OF SANTA ANA

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Agreement on the date and year first written above.

Jennifer L. Hall Thomas R. Hatch
City Clerk Interim City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM CONTRACTOR
SONIA R. CARVALHO, City Attorney

By:____________________________
Brandon Salvatierra Name:

Deputy City Attorney Title:

RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL

______________________________
Hawk Scott
Executive Director
Parks, Recreation and Community Services Agency

Carl Cunningham (Mar 22, 2024 15:41 MDT)

City Council
24 –
4 4/16/2024

EXHIBIT B-1

City Council
24 –
5 4/16/2024

Security Rate:

Standard Events (under 5,000):

Security Guard (Per Hour): $30.69
Security Guard OT (Per Hour): $46.04
Security Guard Holiday (Per Hour): $46.04

Security Supervisor (Per Hour): $33.97
Security Supervisor OT (Per Hour): $50.95
Security Supervisor Holiday (Per Hour): $50.95

Premium Events (5,000+ people):

Security Guard (Per Hour): $33.76
Security Guard OT (Per Hour): $50.65
Security Guard Holiday (Per Hour): $50.65

Security Supervisor (Per Hour): $37.37
Security Supervisor OT (Per Hour): $56.05
Security Supervisor Holiday (Per Hour): $56.05

City Council
24 –
6 4/16/2024

Planning and Building Agency
www.santa-ana.org/planning-and-building/
Item # 25
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Ordinance Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals - Second Reading

AGENDA TITLE
Ordinance Amending the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to add Article XXI to Chapter 8 of the SAMC Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals (Second Reading) Legal notice was published in the OC Reporter on April 10, 2024.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Conduct a second reading and adopt an ordinance amending the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to add Article XXI to Chapter 8 of the SAMC prohibiting Short-Term Rentals.

ORDINANCE NO. NS-3061 entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE XXI TO CHAPTER 8 OF THE

SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING SHORT-TERM RENTALS GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
At the April 2, 2024 meeting, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance and conducted a first reading of a standard ordinance to amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to add Article XXI to Chapter 8 of the SAMC, thereby prohibiting Short- Term Rentals. The standard ordinance, approved 4:3 with Councilmember Bacerra, Mayor Pro Tem Phan, and Mayor Amezcua dissenting, requires a second reading. The urgency ordinance, under a standalone motion and approved with unanimous votes, went into full force and effect immediately.

Both ordinances reaffirm and clarify that short-term rentals, as defined therein, are and have not been permissible in Santa Ana. No changes to either ordinance were made by the City Council; a clean copy of the standard ordinance for second reading is attached to this report as Exhibit 1.

City Council
25 –
1 4/16/2024

Ordinance Prohibiting Short-Term Rentals - Second Reading April 16, 2024

4 1
9 2

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The City Council, at its April 2, 2024 regular meeting, found that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed action is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Ordinance
Submitted By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Planning Manager
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
25 –
2 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING ARTICLE XXI TO CHAPTER 8 OF THE SANTA

ANA MUNICIPAL CODE PROHIBITING SHORT-TERM RENTALS

WHEREAS, the proliferation of online vacation rental websites su ch as Airbnb.com and vrbo.com have encouraged and enabled City of Santa Ana (“City”) property owners, tenants, and occupants to rent their local, residential properties on a short -term rental (“STR”) basis to travelers or transients; and,
WHEREAS, these short-term rentals, generally numbering less than 30 days, are often associated with excessive noise, parking problems, trash, and degradation of a neighborhood’s residential character; and,
WHEREAS, the City has received numerous complaints from residents about the negative secondary effects of short-term rental uses in their residential neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, Short-term rentals also remove housing stock that could otherwise be available for long-term rental or for sale. Data collected from various STR platforms reveals that there are more than 1,100 active STR units across Santa Ana. The City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) for 2021 -2029 is 3,137 permanent housing units. The 1,100 STRs represent about 35% of the City’s housing needs, di verting a significant portion of available housing away from permanent residents; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) Section 41 -190(a), the Zoning Code (Chapter 41 of the SAMC) is a permissive ordinance, meaning that those uses expressly listed in the Zoning Code are permissible, and those not listed are prohibited.

WHEREAS, at present, the SAMC does not list STRs as an approved use in any zoning district, making them prohibited and unauthorized under the current enforcement practice afforded by Section 41-190(a).

WHEREAS, recent court rulings have brought into question the City’s ability to rely on the aforementioned section of the Zoning Code in specifically addressing STRs through the Code Enforcement process.

WHEREAS, the Santa Ana Municipal Code (“SAMC”) does not expressly address short- term rentals in residential zoning districts. However, because short -term rentals are not expressly permitted in residential zoning districts under the SAMC, such transient uses are prohibited; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend the SAMC to expressly prohibit short - term rentals within the City, to reaffirm existing law, and to preserve the residential character of City neighborhoods and stem the negative, secondary effects caused by those uses; and,

City Council
25 –
3 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

WHEREAS, in response to recent legal developments, this urgency ordinance seeks to amend the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC) to prohibit short -term rentals in alignment with the SAMC's current practice and expectation, as well as complian ce with recent court decisions; and,
WHEREAS, there currently exists over 100 confirmed active cases of STRs that have ongoing enforcement notices and violations;
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary for preserving the public peace, health, safety, and welfare to expressly prohibit short-term rentals within the City and to declare such uses as a public nuisance punishable under the SAMC.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Recitals. The recitals above are true, correct and each incorporated herein by reference and adopted as findings by the Santa Ana City Council (“City Council”)

SECTION 2. Addition. Article XXI (Sections 8 -3400 – 8-3402) is hereby added to Chapter 8 of the SAMC to read as follows:

ARTICLE XXI. – SHORT-TERM RENTALS

Sec. 8-3400. – Definitions.

The definitions set forth in this Section shall govern the application and interpretation of this Article:

(a) Home-sharing rental means the rental of a dwelling unit, or por tion thereof, to a person or group of persons, for compensation whether monetary or otherwise, for lodging or sleeping purposes for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive calendar days while at least one of the dwelling unit’s owners lives on-site, in the dwelling unit, throughout the visitors’ stay.

(b) Short-term or vacation rental means the rental to a person or group of persons of a dwelling unit, or portion thereof, for compensation whether monetary or otherwise, for lodging or sleeping purpose s for a period of less than thirty (30) consecutive calendar days without concurrently being occupied by the property owner.

Sec. 8-3401. -Prohibited.

It shall be unlawful for any person or entity to: offer or make available for rent (via advertisement on a short-term or vacation rental website or otherwise) or to rent (by way of a rental agreement, lease, sublease, license, via a short -term or vacation rental website, or any other means, whether oral or written) for compensation or consideration a home-sharing rental, short-term or vacation rental for less than 30 days, pursuant to a rental agreement, lease, sublease, license, via a short - term or vacation rental website, or any other means, whether oral or written, for compensation or consideration, or maintain any advertisement of a home-sharing rental, short -term or vacation

City Council
25 –
4 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

rental for less than 30 consecutive days.

Sec. 8-3402. -Violation; nuisance.

Any violation of this Article is unlawful, is hereby declared a public nuisance, and constitutes a misdemeanor punishable as set forth in Chapter 1 of the SAMC section 1-8. At the discretion of the City Attorney, a violation of this Article may be prosecuted as an infraction or misdemeanor.

In any civil action brought pursuant to this Article, a court of competent jurisdiction may awa rd reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 1-21, the City may issue an administrative citation for any violation of this Article. Such administrative remedy may be ex ercised in place of, or in addition to, any administrative, criminal, civil, or equitable remedy allowed by law.

SECTION 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be inv alid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases or portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 4. CEQA Determination. The City Council finds that this Ordinance is not subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to (Guidelines) Section 15060(c)(2) because the activity will not result in a direct o r reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and 15060(c)(3) because the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly and so is not a project.

SECTION 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

SECTION 6. Publication. The City Clerk shall cer tify the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.

ADOPTED this ___ day of ___________________, 2024.

_______________________
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor

City Council
25 –
5 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney

_______________________________
Brandon Salvatierra
Deputy City Attorney

AYES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________

NOES: Councilmembers: ________________________________________

ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: ________________________________________

NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers: ________________________________________

City Council
25 –
6 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY

I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance No. NS - XXXX to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _________________, 2024.

Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk
City of Santa Ana

City Council
25 –
7 4/16/2024

Finance and Management Services
www.santa-ana.org/finance/
Item # 26
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Municipal Code, Article IV, Division 15, Section 2-643-Second Reading

AGENDA TITLE
Adopt an Ordinance of the City Council of The City of Santa Ana Amending Chapter 2 of The City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (Administration), Article IV (Officers, Departments, Boards and Commissions), Division 15 Relating to Emergency Services Section 2-643 – Definitions (Second Reading)
Legal notice was published in the OC Reporter on April 10, 2024.

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Conduct a second reading and adopt an Ordinance to expand the definition of an emergency in the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

ORDINANCE NO. NS-3062 entitled AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA MUNICIPAL

CODE (ADMINISTRATION), ARTICLE IV (OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS), DIVISION 15 RELATING TO EMERGENCY SERVICES, SECTION 2-643 - DEFINITIONS
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
At its April 2, 2024 regular meeting, the City Council approved the first reading of Ordinance No. NS-3062 amending Chapter 2 of The City of Santa Ana Municipal Code (Administration), Article IV (Officers, Departments, Boards and Commissions), Division 15 relating to emergency services Section 2-643 – Definitions, by unanimous vote.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with the recommendation.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Ordinance No. NS-3062

City Council
26 –
1 4/16/2024

Ordinance Amending Chapter 2 of the Municipal Code, Article IV, Division 15, Section 2- 643
April 16, 2024

4 1
9 3
Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, Executive Director of Finance and Management Services & Jack Ciulla, Chief Technology Innovations Officer Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, Acting City Manager

City Council
26 –
2 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

ORDINANCE NO. NS-XXX

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE SANTA ANA

MUNICIPAL CODE ( ADMINISTRATION), ARTICLE IV
(OFFICERS, DEPARTMENTS, BOARDS AND
COMMISSIONS), DIVISION 15 RELATING TO
EMERGENCY SERVICES, SECTION 2-643 - DEFINITIONS
WHEREAS, Chapter 2, Article IV, Division 15 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (“SAMC”) establishes the emergency organization of the City of Santa Ana (“City” ) and provides for emergency functions of the City in an emergency; and WHEREAS, Section 2 -643 of the SAMC establishes the definitions of different types of emergencies the City may face; and
WHEREAS, California Government Code § 8558 establishes the co nditions or degrees of emergency; “state of war emergency,” “state of emergency,” and “local emergency” for the State of California; and
WHEREAS, Section 2-643 of the SAMC does not currently specifically include cyberterrorism, deenergization event, or electromagnetic pulse attack in its definitions for “emergency or local emergency” or “state of emergency”; and WHEREAS, this ordinance shall amend Section 2-643 of the SAMC to specifically include “cyberterrorism,” deenergization event” and “electromagnetic pulse attack” in its definitions for “emergency or local emergency” to be consistent with state law.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The recitals above are each incorporated by reference and adopted as findings by the City Council.

Section 2. Chapter 2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (Administration), Article IV (Officers, Departments, Boards and Commissions), Division 15 (Emergency Services), Section 2-643 - Definitions is hereby amended to read as follows.

Sec. 2-643. Definitions.

For the purpose of this division, certain words and phrases shall be construed as follows, unless it is apparent from the context that a different meaning is intended:

Exhibit 1

City Council
26 –
3 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

Director or director of emergency services means the individual having primary jurisdiction and authority over the city's response and recovery to emergencies and disasters and is authorized to act on behalf of the city.

Emergency or local emergency means the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the territorial limits of the city or county, caused by such conditions as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, deenergization event, electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the governor's warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy, which are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the political subdivision and require the combined forces of other political subdivisions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the California Public Utilities Commission.

Emergency services/emergency operations/emergency management, used interchangeably, means the preparation for and carrying out of all emergency functions necessary to mitigate, prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from large emergencies or disasters caused by all hazards, whether natural, technological or human caused.

State of emergency means the duly proclaimed existence of conditions of disaster or of extreme peril to the safety of persons and property within the state, caused by such conditions as air pollution, fire, flood, storm, epidemic, riot, drought, cyberterrorism, sudden and severe energy shortage, deenergization event, electromagnetic pulse attack, plant or animal infestation or disease, the governor's warning of an earthquake or volcanic prediction, or an earthquake, or other conditions, other than conditions resulting from a labor controversy or conditions causing a "state of war emergency," which, by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of any single county, city and county, or city and require the combined forces of a mutual aid region or regions to combat, or with respect to regulated energy utilities, a sudden and severe energy shortage requires extraordinary measures beyond the authority vested in the California Public Utilities Commission.

State of war emergency means the condition which exists immediately, with or without a proclamation thereof by the governor, whenever this state or nation is attacked by an enemy of the United States, or upon receipt by the state of a warning from the federal government indicating that such an enemy attack is probable or imminent.

Section 4. The City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it will not result i n a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, as there is

City Council
26 –
4 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

no possibility it will have a significant effect on the environment and it is not a "project", as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.

Section 5. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections , subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 6. This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after its adoption.

Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published as required by law.

ADOPTED this _______ day of ___________, 2024.

_________________________
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney

By:_________________________
Brandon Salvatierra
Deputy City Attorney

AYES: Councilmembers ______________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers _______________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers _______________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers _______________________________________

City Council
26 –
5 4/16/2024

Ordinance No. NS-XXX

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY

I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Ordinance N o.

NS-____________ to be the original ordinance adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _______________, and that said ordinance was published in accordance with the Charter of the City of Santa Ana.

Date: ________________ ____________________________________ City Clerk
City of Santa Ana

City Council
26 –
6 4/16/2024

City Manager Office
www.santa-ana.org/city-managers-office/
Item # 27
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
April 16, 2024
TOPIC: Resolution Opposing the Establishment of a Needle Exchange Program in Santa Ana

AGENDA TITLE
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Ana Announcing Its Strenuous Opposition to the Establishment of a Needle Exchange Program in the City

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt a Resolution opposing the establishment of a needle exchange program in the City of Santa Ana as proposed by the Harm Reduction Institute’s application to the California Department of Public Health.

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ANNOUNCING ITS STRENUOUS OPPOSITION TO THE

ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEEDLE EXCHANGE PROGRAM IN THE CITY
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
No

DISCUSSION
Needle distribution programs have historically been associated with increased public health risks. A needle distribution program that operated in Santa Ana from 2016 to 2018 resulted in 250,000 used syringes being discarded in public areas frequented by children, including the Civic Center, library, senior center, neighborhoods, and businesses. Harm Reduction Institute (HRI) plans to operate a needle distribution program in Santa Ana that would, on an annual basis, provide 300,000 syringes and collect 180,000, potentially leaving 120,000 needles annually that could be discarded in public areas.

On January 5, 2023, HRI submitted an application with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to operate a Needle Exchange Program (NEP) in the City that included mobile delivery of syringes. In their application, HRI noted they would be providing 500,000 syringes and collecting only 300,000.

City Council
27 –
1 4/16/2024

Resolution Opposing the Establishment of a Needle Exchange Program in Santa Ana April 16, 2024

4 1
9 9
On May 10, 2023, the Director of the Orange County Health Care Agency (Local Health Officer) wrote to CDPH advising of the negative experiences with NEP’s including with HRI and the overwhelming burden of used syringes littering the community.

The County’s Local Health Officer recommended CDPH require HRI incorporate three key mitigation measures including: (1) demonstrating safe and effective methods of appropriate syringe disposal and collection; (2) providing counseling services, linkage to behavior health and medical services, and provide follow-up to referrals placed; and (3) community collaboration, data collection, and monitoring to identify positive and negative impacts.

Despite the City’s strenuous opposition to HRI’s application to operate a NEP in the City, on August 11, 2023, CDPH approved HRI’s application.

On August 23, 2023, the City demanded CDPH rescind its authorization for HRI to operate a NEP in the City based on CDPH’s failure to engage in meaningful collaboration with the City pursuant to Health and Safety Code §121349. This prompted CDPH to rescind its authorization for HRI to operate an NEP in the City and placed their application into pending status on August 30, 2023.

On December 20, 2023, HRI submitted a new application to CDPH to operate a NEP in the City and revised its estimate of the number of syringes they would be providing to 300,000 and collecting to 180,000, leaving 120,000 syringes unaccounted for. HRI’s latest application is currently pending with CDPH and CDPH has not yet engaged in the mandatory consultation process pursuant to the Health and Safety Code with the City.

The Santa Ana City Council desires to ensure that NEP operations, which are detrimental to the health, safety, and welfare, are not authorized and established in the City.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action