Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Santa Ana City Council
November 4, 2025

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
November 4, 2025
Body
Santa Ana City Council
Pages
16
Original file
158.0 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on santa-ana.primegov.com. That file is the official record.

Analysis of the Issues
Historical Listing
In March 1999, the City Council approved Ordinance No. NS-2363 establishing the Historic Resources Commission and the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission may, by resolution and at a noticed public hearing, designate as a historical property any building or part thereof, object, structure, or site having importance to the history or architecture of the city in accordance with the criteria set forth in Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC). This project entails applying the selection criteria established in Chapter 30 of the SAMC (Places of Historical and Architectural Significance) to determine if this structure is eligible for historic designation to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The first criterion for selection requires that the structures be 50 or more years old.

The structure identified meets the selection criteria for inclusion on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to criteria contained in Section 30-2 of the SAMC, as the structure is 51 years old and is associated with an individual significant to the history of Sant Ana. No known code violations exist on record for this property.

The Hector Godinez House is historically significant for its association with its original owner and builder, Hector G. Godinez. Building permit data indicates the property was built in 1974 by owner and contractor Hector Godinez for $50,000 (City of Santa Ana 2025). Before owning the subject property, Mr. Godinez was born in San Diego in 1924 but moved to Santa Ana where he attended ethnically segregated schools, which became a social issue he fought against later in life. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Mr.

Godinez enlisted in the United States Army and served in General Patton's Third Army as a tank commander. For his service, he earned a Bronze Star for Bravery, five battle stars, and a Purple Heart when he was injured during the Battle of the Bulge. After his honorable discharge and through a Federal program created to help partially disabled veterans gain government jobs, Mr. Godinez started his 49-year career with the United States Postal Service as a letter carrier in Santa Ana. In 1961, Mr. Godinez was appointed by President John F. Kennedy as the first Mexican American postmaster not only in Santa Ana but in the country (United States Congressional Hearing 2002; Ancestry.com 2010; The Register 1961). From there, Hector worked his way up to become the Southern California district manager for the United States Post Office, managing more than 44,000 employees and an operating budget of $750 million.

Alongside his work as a postmaster, Mr. Godinez was a founder of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) Santa Ana chapter and worked to desegregate Orange County public schools. Santa Ana LULAC was dedicated to addressing improvement of conditions for Mexican Americans and responsible for Mendez v. Orange County Board of Education in 1947. This lawsuit fought to desegregate Orange County schools and was City Council 13 – 187 11/4/2025
HRCA No. 2025-08, HRC No. 2025-10, HPPA No. 2025-10– The Hector Godinez House (433 W. Santa Clara Avenue)
September 23, 2025

Page 3 ends

influential as the basis for Brown v. Board of Education at the national level. He served as national president of the LULAC from 1960 to 1961 (United States Congressional Hearing 2002).

After working tirelessly for the United States Postal Service, Mr. Godinez was appointed District Manager of Los Angeles and Orange Counties in 1975 and again as the regional director of Sequoia District Office (which managed all mail from the coastal regions to the Mojave in southern California) in 1977 (Los Angeles Times 1975, 1977). He served on several commissions and boards while occupying the subject property including the city redevelopment commission in 1976, served as president of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and Trustee of Rancho Santiago Community College District in 1976, and the Santa Ana Healthcare Authority in 1979 along with service in education, support for veterans, and unionizing the Santa Ana branch of postal workers (The Register 1976a, 1976b; Los Angeles Times 1979). He was the first Hispanic to be named the president of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and a founding member of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Board (United States Congressional Hearing 2002). Additionally, Mr.

Godinez was the recipient of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People’s Human Rights Award and the Western Region’s Community Service Award, and he was among the first recipients of the Postmaster General’s Award for Executive Achievement. He was distinguished by the National Association of Postmasters, the National League of Postmasters, and the National Association of Postal Supervisors (United States Congressional Hearing 2002). In 1999, Mr. Godinez passed away, and the house sold in 2001 (ParcelQuest 2025). The current residents are Tom Chappell and Elvia Orrillo Blas.

Located in the Floral Park neighborhood, the Hector Godinez House consists of a onestory, single-family residence and pool house constructed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style. Built on an L-plan, the residence is capped with a clay, barrel-tile-clad hipped roof.

Siding throughout the residence is rough stucco. Along the west side of the building, an arcade with tiled flooring and an exposed wood ceiling starts from the front of the building, where it shelters an attached two-car garage. The arcade terminates at the north at the deeply set-back front entrance, which is accessed by way of the glazed front door with a terracotta surround. East-facing windows face much of the course of the arcade.

Generally, these are wood fixed or tripartite sliding units, though a single sliding vinyl window punctures the wall at the clerestory level.

Accessed through a gate and rough stucco-clad walls, the east elevation features woodframe horizontal sliding wood sash windows and vinyl-frame horizontal sliding sash windows. Additionally, a set of wood-frame French doors sit at the center of the east elevation adjacent to decorative metal sconces. A concrete path runs down the side of the east elevation towards the backyard which features a swimming pool, pool house, and a trellis shade structure. The north elevation accesses the backyard through four entrances: one entrance at the eastern end has a single, glazed wood-frame door and City Council 13 – 188 11/4/2025
HRCA No. 2025-08, HRC No. 2025-10, HPPA No. 2025-10– The Hector Godinez House (433 W. Santa Clara Avenue)
September 23, 2025

Page 4 ends

three of the entrances are wood-frame French doors with sidelites. The entrances sit on either side of a large exterior brick chimney and vinyl-frame horizontal sliding sash windows (Figure 8). Another set of wood-frame French doors and a single wood-frame door are located on the west façade facing a concrete path leading to the backyard.

At the rear of the property adjacent to the swimming pool is a pool house structure sitting on a brick foundation and capped with a front-gabled roof clad in barrel tile cladding. The wood frame structure of the roof is exposed atop stucco and brick clad walls which are open to the pool with a couch. Landscaping on the property consists of a lawn north and south of the residence, palms and ornamental plants, and mature trees at the back yard.

Four large brick-clad columns line the front yard along the sidewalk and West Santa Clara Avenue.

Character-defining features of the Hector Godinez house that should be preserved are those constructed within the period of significance of 1974-1979 and which generally reflect the property’s Spanish Colonial Revival style. They include, but are not limited to, its L plan, cross-gabled roof, clay-barrel-tile roof cladding, stucco exterior, east-façade arcade with exposed wood beams, and original wood-sash sliding windows. The Hector Godinez House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Key Category Criterion 4(b) for its association with Hector G. Godinez, activist and community leader in Santa Ana and Southern California. The established period of significance begins in 1974, when he constructed the residence, and concludes in 1979, when he was part of the Santa Ana Healthcare Authority and District Manager for the United States Postal Service in Southern California.

Mills Act Agreement
Ordinance No. NS-2382 authorized the Historic Resources Commission to execute Historic Property Preservation Agreements (HPPA), commonly known as Mills Act agreements for eligible properties (Exhibit 2). To be eligible for the Mills Act, the property must be listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties. The Historic Resources Commission Application and Historic Register Categorization actions proposed for this site authorize the listing of the property on the local register. The agreement provides monetary incentives to the property owner in the form of a property tax reduction in exchange for the owner’s voluntary commitment to maintain the property in a good state of repair as necessary to maintain its character and appearance. Once recorded, the agreement generates a different valuation method in determining the property’s assessed value, resulting in tax savings for the owner. Aside from the tax savings, the benefits include:
• Long term preservation of the property and visual improvement to the neighborhood • A mechanism to provide for property rehabilitation
• Incentives for potential buyers to purchase historic structures City Council 13 – 189 11/4/2025
HRCA No. 2025-08, HRC No. 2025-10, HPPA No. 2025-10– The Hector Godinez House (433 W. Santa Clara Avenue)
September 23, 2025

Page 5 ends

• Discouraging inappropriate alterations to the property The property has no identified unauthorized modifications. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement subject to a completion of future improvements as described in an attached Work Plan.

Overall, future improvements (Work Plan) proposed by the homeowner during the initial ten years of the Mills Act Agreement include the following: 1) assess condition of all windows, including frames and sashes, and repair or replace in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval; 2) assess condition of roof, roofing tiles, exposed rafters, and fascia and repair or replace in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval; 3) replace vinyl windows on east and north facades with stylistically appropriate wood sash windows, subject to Planning Division staff approval; 4) assess condition of hardscaping throughout the property and repair or replace with Planning Division staff approval; 5) assess paint and stucco throughout the residence and repaint, repair or replace, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval.

As part of the Mills Act approval process, staff will work with the applicant to ensure that a bronze plaque is installed honoring and recognizing the structure. The plaque will include the historic name, address, year built, and local historic register designation.

Lastly, the site will be subject to general maintenance and upkeep requirements including, but not limited to, replacement or restoration of damaged character-defining features, landscaping upkeep, painting, etc. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement to enable the Mills Act.

Public Notification
The subject site is located within the Floral Park Neighborhood Association. The president of this Neighborhood Association was notified by mail 10 days prior to this public hearing.

In addition, the project site was posted with a notice advertising this public hearing, a notice was published in the Orange County Reporter and mailed notices were sent to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. At the time of this printing, no correspondence, either written or electronic, has been received from any members of the public.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 31 – Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) as these actions City Council 13 – 190 11/4/2025
HRCA No. 2025-08, HRC No. 2025-10, HPPA No. 2025-10– The Hector Godinez House (433 W. Santa Clara Avenue)
September 23, 2025

Page 6 ends

are designed to preserve historic resources. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2025-78, will be filed for this project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $1,590.13 annually, for a period of not less than ten years.

EXHIBITS

1. Resolution

2. Mills Act Agreement

3. 500-Foot Radius Map

4. Copy of Public Notice
Submitted By: James Williams, Contract Planner
Approved By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency City Council 13 – 191 11/4/2025

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2025-XX

Page 1 of 6 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX

A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC RESOURCES

COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA APPROVING
HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION APPLICATION NO.
2025-08 TO PLACE THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 433 W.

SANTA CLARA AVENUE, SANTA ANA, ON THE

HISTORICAL REGISTER AND APPROVING HISTORIC
REGISTER CATEGORIZATION NO. 2025-10 PLACING

SAID PROPERTY WITHIN THE CONTRIBUTIVE

CATEGORY

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows:

A. On September 23, 2025, the Historic Resources Commission held a duly noticed public hearing for the placement on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2025-08) and categorization (Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2025-10) of the Hector Godinez House located at 433 W. Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana.

B. The Hector Godinez House is associated with the historical contributions of Hector Godinez and was built in the Spanish Colonial Revival style in 1974.

C. The Hector Godinez House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 4(b) as for the historical contributions of Hector Godinez, including activism on behalf of school desegregation and other civil rights issues, appointment as the first Latino postmaster in Santa Ana and the United States and long tenure in that role, and other contributions to community life in Santa Ana and Orange County. The house, of which Godinez was the builder and first owner-occupant displays characteristics of its original Spanish Colonial Revival-style construction through its use of cross-gabled roof, clay-barrel-tile roofing, entryway arcade, and stucco exterior, among other original features. The recommended categorization is “Key” because it a significant person in the city. Character-defining features of the Hector Godinez house are those constructed within the period of significance of 1974-1979 and which generally reflect the property’s Spanish Colonial Revival style. They include, but are not limited to, its L plan, cross-gabled roof, clay-barrel-tile roof cladding, stucco exterior, east-façade arcade with exposed wood beams, and original wood-sash sliding windows.

City Council 13 – 192 11/4/2025

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2025-XX

Page 2 of 6 ends

D. The legal owner of the property is E. Thomas Chappel, an Unmarried Man.

E. The legal description for the subject property is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by this reference as though fully set forth herein.

F. The subject property meets the standards for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-2 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

G. The subject property meets the minimum standards for placement in the Key category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

H. In addition to meeting the standards for placement in the Key category pursuant to Section 30-2.2(2) of the Santa Ana Municipal Code, the applicant has agreed, as part of the requested Mills Act agreement Work Plan, to restoration of select elements described therein within the first five years of the Agreement’s term, including assessing condition of all windows, including frames and sashes, and repairing or replacing in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval; assessing condition of roof, roofing tiles, exposed rafters, and fascia and repairing or replacing in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval; and replacing vinyl windows on east and north facades with stylistically appropriate wood sash windows, subject to Planning Division staff approval.

Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, Class 31, as these actions are designed to preserve historical resources.

Categorical Exemption No. ER-2025-78 will be filed for this project.

Section 3. The Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana, after conducting the public hearing, hereby approves:

A. Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2025-08 to place the Hector Godinez House located at 433 W. Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, 92706 on the historical register, as conditioned in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein; and
B. Historic Register Categorization No. 2025-10 placing the Hector Godinez House located at 433 W. Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, 92706 within the Contributive category, as conditioned in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

These decisions are based upon the evidence submitted at the above said hearing, which includes, but is not limited to: the Staff report and exhibits attached thereto, the report entitled “Historical Property Description,” and the public testimony, all of which are incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 4. For the subject property, a report entitled “Historical Property Description” is on file with the Planning Division, and is hereby approved and adopted, and together with the staff report and this Resolution, justify the findings for placement on the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties into a category. The Historic Resources City Council 13 – 193 11/4/2025

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2025-XX

Page 3 of 6 ends

Commission Secretary is authorized and directed to include this Resolution in the City of Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties.

Section 5. The Historic Resources Commission Secretary is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Recorder’s Office after the adoption of this Resolution pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5029.

ADOPTED this 23rd day of September, 2025.
__________________________
Edward Murashie
Chairperson
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:________________________
Brandon Salvatierra
Deputy City Attorney

AYES: Commissioners:

NOES: Commissioners:

ABSENT: Commissioners:

ABSTENTIONS: Commissioners:

City Council 13 – 194 11/4/2025

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2025-XX

Page 4 of 6 ends

CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Gema Zapien, Acting Historic Resources Commission Secretary, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2025-XX to be the original resolution adopted by Historic Resources Commission of the City of Santa Ana on September 23, 2025.

Date: ________________ ____________________________________ Gema Zapien
Acting Commission Secretary
City of Santa Ana
City Council 13 – 195 11/4/2025

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2025-XX

Page 5 of 6 ends

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION
APN Address Legal Description Owner Names
002-123-18 433 W. Santa Clara
Avenue

THE LAND REFERRED TO

HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED

IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA,

ORANGE COUNTY,

CALIFRONIA, AND IS
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 14 OF TRACT NO. 76, AS

PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 22, PAGES 35 OF

MISCELLANUEOUS MAPS IN

THE OFFICE OF THE

COUNTY RECORDER OF

SAID COUNTY
EXCEPT FROM SAID LOT 14
THE WESTERLY 15.00 FEET
AND THE EASTERLY 10.00

FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY
150.00 FEET.

E. Thomas
Chappell
City Council 13 – 196 11/4/2025

FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
Resolution No. 2025-XX

Page 6 of 6 ends

EXHIBIT B
Conditions of Approval for Historic Resources Commission Application No. 2025-12 and Historic Resources Commission Categorization No. 2025-08 The Applicant must comply with each condition listed below prior to exercising the rights conferred by the Historic Resource Commission’s approval and the City of Santa Ana Register of Historic Properties pursuant to Section 30-6 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code. The Applicant must remain in compliance with all condition(s) listed below:

1. Within 180-days of execution of this resolution, the applicant shall install a bronze plaque as per a template on file with the Planning Division honoring and recognizing the structure at 433 W. Santa Clara Avenue, historically known as the Hector Godinez House. The plaque shall include the historic name, address, year built, and local historic register designation. The final dimensions, location, text and description on the plaque shall be reviewed and approved by Planning Division staff.

2. The applicant shall regularly maintain all landscaping in the front yard area (pruning and thinning trees and shrubs) so that the historic building and its character defining features (including but not limited to its low-to-the-ground massing, cross-hipped roof, and wood-sash windows in multiple configurations) are visible from the public right-of-way.

City Council 13 – 197 11/4/2025

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: Clerk of the Council
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
_________________________________________________________________________

HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT
This Historic Property Preservation Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and E. Thomas Chappell, an Unmarried Man, (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Owner”), owner of real property located at 433 West Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties.

RECITALS
A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the “Mills Act”) to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity.

B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 433 West Santa Clara Avenue, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the “Historic Property.”
C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner.

E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which City Council 13 – 198 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 2 -
will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows:

1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement.

This Agreement shall be effective and commence on November 5, 2025, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below.

2. Renewal.
a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein.
b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party.

Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein. c. Within 30 days from receipt of City’s notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City’s decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply.

3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property.

During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions:
a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its characterdefining features described in the “Executive Summary” and “Historical Property Description” attached hereto, marked collectively as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City.

City Council 13 – 199 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 3 -
b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition.
c. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public.
d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character-defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location.
e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner’s compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. As part of the periodic inspection, Owner shall supply information in a format determined acceptable by the representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization information required to determine compliance with the terms of this Agreement.
f. Owner shall implement the rehabilitation and restoration work items as discussed in detail in Exhibit D, “Proposed Structure Improvements” or “Work Plan” and the City Council Historic Property Preservation Agreement (HPPA No. 2025-10) staff report dated November 4, 2025. All work items shall be completed within the first ten years of the Mills Act Agreement, with specific items completed within the first five years including assessing condition of all windows, including frames and sashes, and repairing or replacing in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval; assessing condition of roof, roofing tiles, exposed rafters, and fascia and repairing or replacing in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval; and replacing vinyl windows on east and north facades with stylistically appropriate wood sash windows, subject to Planning Division staff approval. Proof of completion, as requested by the City of Santa Ana, will be required in order to satisfy and maintain the Mills Act Agreement.

Staff approval is required before items are amended or removed/replaced from the improvements list.

City Council 13 – 200 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 4 -

4. Furnishing of Information.

The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.

5. Cancellation.
a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286.

This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 ½) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement.
b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. c. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288.

6. Enforcement of Agreement.
a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate. b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City’s regulations governing historic properties are available to City to City Council 13 – 201 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 5 -
pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder.

7. Binding effect of Agreement.
a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 433 West Santa Clara Avenue, Assessor Parcel Number, 002-123-18, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement. b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner’s successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property.

Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument.
c. This property is listed in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Register).

In any real property transaction, the owner of this property or the owner’s representative shall provide the buyer of this property with notice that the property is listed on the City’s historic Register.

8. No Compensation.

Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property.

9. Notice.

Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto.

City: City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: City Clerk
Owner: E. Thomas Chappell
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
City Council 13 – 202 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 6 -

10. General Provisions.
a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise.
b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. c. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney’s fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court.
f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby.
g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County.

City Council 13 – 203 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 7 -

11. Recordation.

No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange.

12. Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto.

13. Effective Date
This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows}
City Council 13 – 204 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 8 -
ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
________________________ _________________________
JENNIFER L. HALL ALVARO NUÑEZ
City Clerk City Manager
OWNER
Date: ___________________ By:__________________
E. THOMAS CHAPPELL
APPROVED AS TO FORM: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

SONIA CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _____________________ _____________________

BRANDON SALVATIERRA ALI PEZESHKPOUR
Deputy City Attorney Executive Director
Planning and Building Agency
City Council 13 – 205 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 9 -

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFRONIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

LOT 14 OF TRACT NO. 76, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 22, PAGES 35 OF

MISCELLANUEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY
EXCEPT FROM SAID LOT 14 THE WESTERLY 15.00 FEET AND THE EASTERLY 10.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 150.00 FEET.

Assessor’s Parcel Number: 002-123-18
City Council 13 – 206 11/4/2025
Exhibit B

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Hector Godinez House
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
NAME Hector Godinez House REF. NO.

ADDRESS 433 West Santa Clara Avenue
CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY
YEAR BUILT 1974 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Key
HISTORIC DISTRICT Floral Park NEIGHBORHOOD Floral Park
CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION B/2 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 5S3 Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted
Prehistoric Historic Both
HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION:

The Hector Godinez House is significantly and historically associated with Hector G. Godinez. Mr. Godinez was the first Mexican American appointed to United States Postal Service Postmaster in Santa Ana and the country in 1961 by President Kennedy and worked as an activist and community leader for the Hispanic community of Santa Ana fighting racism in education and other facets of society. Mr. Godinez was a founding member of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) Santa Ana chapter and worked to desegregate Orange County public schools. He served as national president of the LULAC from 1960 to 1961.

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION:

The Hector Godinez House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Key Category Criterion 2(c) for its association with Hector G. Godinez, activist and community leader in Santa Ana and Southern California. The established period of signifcance is 1974 when he constructed the residence and garage to 1979 whe he was part of the Santa Ana Healthcare Authority and District Manager for the United States Postal Service in Southern California.

EXPLANATION OF CODES:
• California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, “How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources,” September 4, 2001.) 2: It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. • It is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. 5S3: Appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation.

City Council 13 – 207 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #______________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #__________________________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial______________________________________________ NRHP Status Code_____________________________________
Other Listings_____________________________________________________________________ Review Code________ Reviewer________________________ Date_______________ Page _1_ of _6_ Resource name(s) or number Hector Godinez House P1. Other Identifier: N/A
*P2. Location: Unrestricted *a. County Orange County
*b. USGS 7.5’ Quad: Orange Quadrangle California-Orange County 7.5-Minute Series Date: 2022 *c. Address 433 West Santa Clara Avenue City: Santa Ana Zip: 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor’s Parcel Number 002-123-18 *P3a. Description:

Located on in the Floral Park neighborhood, the Hector Godinez House consists of a one-story, single-family residence and pool house constructed in the Spanish Colonial Revival style (Figure 1). Built on an L-plan, the residence is capped with a clay, barrel-tile-clad hipped roof. Siding throughout the residence is rough stucco. Along the west side of the building, an arcade with tiled flooring and an exposed wood ceiling starts from the front of the building, where it shelters an attached two-car garage (Figure 2). The arcade terminates at the north at the deeply set-back front entrance, which is accessed by way of the glazed front door with a terracotta surround. East-facing windows front much of the course of the arcade. Generally, these are wood fixed or tripartite sliding units, though a single sliding vinyl window punctures the wall at the clerestory level (Figure 3). (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 5.)
*P3b. Resource Attributes: HP2. Single-Family Residence *P4. Resources Present: Building
P5b. Photo:
(Figure 1) Primary (south) facade,
view north, taken April 29, 2025.
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: historic
1974, City of Santa Ana 2025
*P7. Owner and Address:

Edward T. Chappell
433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706-1615
*P8. Recorded by:

James Williams
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza M-20
Santa Ana, CA 92702
*P9. Date Recorded:

April 29, 2025
*P10. Survey Type:

Intensive Survey Update
*P11. Report Citation:

None
*Attachments: Sketch Map
Continuation Sheet Building, Structure, and Object Record DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
P5a. Photo
Exhibit B
City Council 13 – 208 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #__________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#______________________________________________

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 6 ends

*Resource Name or #: Hector Godinez House
B1. Historic Name: Hector Godinez House
B2. Common Name: Same
B3. Original Use: Single-family residence B4. Present Use: Single-family residence *B5. Architectural Style: Spanish Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History:

January 1, 1974. Residence and garage constructed. $50,000. (City of Santa Ana 2025) June 24, 1975. Swimming pool constructed. $5,000. (City of Santa Ana 2025) Circa 1999. Trellis shade structure added. Value unknown. (NETR Online 2025) February 29, 2016. Rough stucco siding replaced. Value unknown. (City of Santa Ana 2025) Date unknown. Original windows replaced with wood-frame and vinyl-frame sash windows, original doors replaced, garage doors replaced.
*B7. Moved? No
*B8. Related Features: N/A
B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Hector Godinez
*B10. Significance: Theme Mexican American Heritage and Advocacy in Santa Ana Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: 1974-1979 Property Type: Single-family residence Applicable Criteria: B/2

The Hector Godinez House is historically significant for its association with its original owner and builder, Hector G. Godinez.

Building permit data indicates the property was built in 1974 by owner and contractor Hector Godinez for $50,000 (City of Santa Ana 2025). Before owning the subject property, Mr. Godinez was born in San Diego in 1924 but moved to Santa Ana where he attended ethnically segregated schools, which became a social issue he fought against later in life. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor, Mr. Godinez enlisted in the United States Army and served in General Patton's Third Army as a tank commander. For his service, he earned a Bronze Star for Bravery, five battle stars, and a Purple Heart when he was injured during the Battle of the Bulge. After his honorable discharge and through a Federal program created to help partially disabled veterans gain government jobs, Mr. Godinez started his 49-year career with the United States Postal Service as a letter carrier in Santa Ana.

In 1961, Mr. Godinez was appointed by President John F. Kennedy as the first Mexican American postmaster not only in Santa Ana but in the country (United States Congressional Hearing 2002; Ancestry.com 2010; The Register 1961). From there, Hector worked his way up to become the Southern California district manager for the United States Post Office, managing more than 44,000 employees and an operating budget of $750 million. (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 6).

B11. Additional Resource Attributes: None
*B12. References:
(See Continuation Sheet 5 of 6.)
B13. Remarks: None
*B14. Evaluator: Ashley Losco, City of Santa Ana.
*Date of Evaluation: August 12, 2025
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
Sketch Map
(This space reserved for official comments.)
Hector Godinez House
433 W. Santa Clara Avenue N

SANTA CLARA AVENUE
City Council 13 – 209 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 3 ends

*Recorded by James Williams *Date April 29, 2025  Continuation DPR 523L
*P3a. Description (continued):

Accessed through a gate and rough stucco-clad walls, the east elevation features wood-frame horizontal sliding wood sash windows and vinyl-frame horizontal sliding sash windows (Figures 4 and 5). Additionally, a set of wood-frame French doors sit at the center of the east elevation adjacent to decorative metal sconces. A concrete path runs down the side of the east elevation towards the backyard which features a swimming pool, pool house, and a trellis shade structure. The north elevation accesses the backyard through four entrances: one entrance at the eastern end has a single, glazed wood-frame door and three of the entrances are wood-frame French doors with sidelites (Figures 6 and 7). The entrances sit on either side of a large exterior brick chimney and vinyl-frame horizontal sliding sash windows (Figure 8). Another set of wood-frame French doors and a single wood-frame door are located on the west façade facing a concrete path leading to the backyard.

At the rear of the property adjacent to the swimming pool is a pool house structure sitting on a brick foundation and capped with a front-gabled roof clad in barrel tile cladding (Figures 9 and 10). The wood frame structure of the roof is exposed atop stucco and brick clad walls which are open to the pool with a couch. Landscaping on the property consists of a lawn north and south of the residence, palms and ornamental plants, and a mature trees at the back yard. Four large brick-clad columns line the front yard along the sidewalk and West Santa Clara Avenue. *B10. Significance (continued):

Alongside his work as a postmaster, Mr. Godinez was a founder of the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) Santa Ana chapter and worked to desegregate Orange County public schools. Santa Ana LULAC was dedicated to addressing improvement of conditions for Mexican Americans and responsible for Mendez v. Orange County Board of Education in 1947.

This lawsuit fought to desegregate Orange County schools and was influential as the basis for Brown v. Board of Education at the national level. He served as national president of the LULAC from 1960 to 1961 (United States Congressional Hearing 2002).

After working tirelessly for the United States Postal Service, Mr. Godinez was appointed District Manager of Los Angeles and Orange Counties in 1975 and again as the regional director of sequoia district office (which managed all mail from the coastal regions to the Mojave in southern California) in 1977 (Los Angeles Times 1975, 1977). He served on several commissions and boards while occupying the subject property including the city redevelopment commission in 1976, served as president of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and Trustee of Rancho Santiago Community College District in 1976, and the Santa Ana Healthcare Authority in 1979 along with service in education, support for veterans, and unionizing the Santa Ana branch of postal workers (The Register 1976a, 1976b; Los Angeles Times 1979). He was the first Hispanic to be named the president of the Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce and a founding member of the Santa Ana Redevelopment Board (United States Congressional Hearing 2002). Additionally, Mr. Godinez was the recipient of the NAACP’s Human Rights Award and the Western Region’s Community Service Award, and he was among the first recipients of the Postmaster General’s Award for Executive Achievement. He was distinguished by the National Association of Postmasters, the National League of Postmasters, and the National Association of Postal Supervisors (United States Congressional Hearing 2002). In 1999, Mr. Godinez passed away, and the house sold in 2001 (ParcelQuest 2025). The current owners and residents are Tom Chappell and Elvia Orrillo Blas.

The Hector Godinez House is located in Floral Park, a neighborhood northwest of downtown Santa Ana bounded by West Seventeenth Street, North Flower Street, Riverside Drive, and Broadway. Groves of orange, avocado, and walnut trees and widely scattered ranch houses characterized this area before 1920. Developer and builder Allison Honer (1897-1981), credited as the subdivider and builder of a major portion of northwest Santa Ana, arrived in Santa Ana from Beaver Falls, New York in 1922 (Talbert, pages 353-356). “Before nightfall on the day of his arrival, Mr. Honer purchased a parcel of land. And that month, he began building custom homes in Santa Ana” (Orange County Register 1981). The parcel chosen became the Floral Park subdivision between Seventeenth Street and Santiago Creek. “When built in the 1920s, the Floral Park homes were the most lavish and expensive in the area. They sold for about $45,000 each” (Orange County Register 1981). Revival architecture in a wide variety of romantic styles was celebrated in the 1920s and 1930s and Floral Park showcased examples of the English Tudor, French Norman, Spanish Colonial, and Colonial Revival. The Allison Honer Construction Company went on to complete such notable projects as the 1935 Art Deco styled Old Santa Ana City Hall, the El Toro Marine Base during World War II, and the 1960 Honer Shopping Plaza. Honer lived in the neighborhood he had helped to create, at 615 West Santa Clara Avenue.

In the late 1920s and 1930s, another builder, Roy Roscoe Russell (1881-1965), continued developing the groves of Floral Park.

An early Russell project was his 1928 subdivision of Victoria Drive between West Nineteenth Street and West Santa Clara Avenue. The homes were quite grand and displayed various revival styles, including Russell’s own large, Colonial Revival mansion at 2009 Victoria Drive. In 1937, Roy Rodney Russell, joined his father’s firm and by 1945 it was renamed as Roy Russell and Son. In the early post World War II years, Floral Park continued its development as numerous, smaller, singlefamily houses were built. Continuing in the Floral Park tradition, they were mostly revival in style. In the 1950s, low, horizontal City Council 13 – 210 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 4 ends

*Recorded by James Williams *Date April 29, 2025  Continuation DPR 523L
Ranch Style houses completed the growth of Floral Park. Today, Floral Park maintains its identity as the premier neighborhood of Santa Ana, historically home to many affluent and prominent citizens.

The Hector Godinez House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Key Category Criterion 4(b) for its association with Hector G. Godinez, activist and community leader in Santa Ana and Southern California. The established period of signifcance is 1974, when he constructed the residence, to 1979, when he was part of the Santa Ana Healthcare Authority and District Manager for the United States Postal Service in Southern California. Character-defining features of the Hector Godinez house that should be preserved are those constructed within the period of significance of 1974- 1979 and which generally reflect the property’s Spanish Colonial Revival style. They include, but are not limited to, its L plan, cross-gabled roof, clay-barrel-tile roof cladding, stucco exterior, east-façade arcade with exposed wood beams, and original wood-sash sliding windows.
*B12. References (continued):

Ancestry.com. 2010. U.S., Appointments of U. S. Postmasters, 1832-1971 [database on-line]. Lehi, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. National Archives in Washington, DC; Washington, DC; Record of Appointment of Postmasters, 1832- Sept. 30, 1971; Record Group: Records of the Post Office Department; Record Group Number: 28; Series: M841; Roll Number: 11. https://www.ancestry.com/search/collections/1932/records/282295?tid=&pid=&queryId=87f4b886-3e0d41d1-9d04-5792f5eaba75&_phsrc=JhD1816&_phstart=successSource (accessed August 2025).

Los Angeles Times. 1975. “Postmaster Named District Manager.” October 17, 1975. https://www.newspapers.com/image/165914073/?match=1&terms=%22hector%20godinez%22 (accessed August 2025). ____. 1977. “Godinez will Head Postal Services Regional Office.” November 18, 1977. https://www.newspapers.com/image/165144141/?match=1&terms=%22hector%20godinez%22 (accessed August 2025). ____.1979. “Group Plans to By Hospitals.” February 10, 1979. https://www.newspapers.com/image/384986050/?match=1&terms=%22hector%20godinez%22 NETR Online. 2025. Historic aerials and topographic maps including 1999. https://www.historicaerials.com/ (accessed August 2025).

ParcelQuest. 2025. Property Information for 433 West Santa Clara Avenue. https://pqweb.parcelquest.com/#login (accessed August 2025).

The Register. 1961. “New Acting Postmaster.” April 1, 1961. https://www.newspapers.com/image/996394799/?match=1&terms=%22hector%20godinez%22 (accessed August 2025). ____.1976a. “Aides Urge Economist Contract February 8, 1976.” https://www.newspapers.com/image/82160924/?match=1&terms=%22hector%20godinez%22 (accessed August 2025). ____.1976b. “Advertisement.” June 7, 1976.
https://www.newspapers.com/image/90356188/?match=1&terms=%22hector%20godinez%22 (accessed August 2025).

Santa Ana, City of. 2025. Building Permits for 433 West Santa Clara Avenue. Provided by the City of Santa Ana.

United States Congressional Hearing. 2002. Congressional Record — House H1181. April 10, 2002.

City Council 13 – 211 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 5 ends

*Recorded by James Williams *Date April 29, 2025  Continuation DPR 523L
Additional Figures:

Figure 2. Arcade on the primary (south) façade and east elevation with stucco columns, tile flooring, garage
openings, and primary entrance in background, facing
north.

Figure 3. These windows are representative of wood
tripartite windows on the primary façade, facing
northeast.

Figure 4. East façade with wood sliding sash window and concrete path to backyard, facing north.

Figure 5. East and north facades featuring vinyl-frame
sliding sash windows, facing southwest.

Figure 6. North façade single, wood-frame door entrance and vinyl window, facing southeast.

Figure 7. Representative example of wood-frame French
doors on north façade, facing southwest.

City Council 13 – 212 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 6 ends

*Recorded by James Williams *Date April 29, 2025  Continuation DPR 523L
Figure 8. Exterior brick chinmey on the north façade and trellis shade structure, facing south.

Figure 9. Backyard and swimming pool, facing west.

Figure 10. Pool house in the backyard feature barrel tile roofing and stucco and brick cladding, facing north.

City Council 13 – 213 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 W. Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 1 -
Exhibit C
Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S.

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows:

1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose.

2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible.

3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.

4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment.

These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected.

5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity.

6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures.

7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken.

8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project.

9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, and such design is compatible with City Council 13 – 214 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
433 W. Santa Clara Avenue
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 2 -
size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment.

10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired.

City Council 13 – 215 11/4/2025
Exhibit D: Proposed Structure Improvements (“Work Plan”) 433 West Santa Clara Avenue
Item Year Improvement
1 2026 Assess condition of all windows, including frames and sashes, and repair or replace in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval.

Trim trees, bushes and other landscaping to maintain a clear view of the property from the public right of way.
2 2028 Assess condition of roof, roofing tiles, exposed rafters, and fascia and repair or replace in-kind, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval. 3 2030 Replace vinyl windows on east and north facades with wood sash windows, subject to Planning Division staff approval.
4 2032 Assess condition of hardscaping throughout the property and repair or replace with Planning Division staff approval.
5 2034 Assess paint and stucco throughout the residence and repair or replace, as necessary and subject to Planning Division staff approval.

City Council 13 – 216 11/4/2025

P L A N N I N G AND B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y
500’ RADIUS
SITE
HRCA-2025-08, HRC-2025-10, HPPA-2025-08
433 WEST SANTA CLARA AVENUE

THE HECTOR GODINEZ HOUSE
City Council 13 – 217 11/4/2025
This space for filing stamp only
OR#:

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W. Santa Ana Blvd., Suite 205, Santa Ana, California 92701-4542 Telephone (714) 543-2027 / Fax (714) 542-6841

PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
State of California )
County of Orange ) ss
Notice Type:

Ad Description:

I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the City of Santa Ana, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of Orange, State of California, under date of June 2, 1922, Case No. 13,421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:

Executed on: 10/10/2004
At Los Angeles, California
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Signature

O R A N G E C O U N T Y R E P O R T E R
~ SINCE 1921 ~
600 W SANTA ANA BLVD STE 812, SANTA ANA, CA 92701
(714) 543-2027 (714) 542-6841
OR 3965548

GEMA ZAPIEN

CITY OF SANTA ANA/PLANNING & BUILDING AGEN
20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA 2ND FLR
SANTA ANA, CA - 92702

GPN - GOVT PUBLIC NOTICE
433 W Santa Clara Ave
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer and publisher of the ORANGE COUNTY REPORTER, a newspaper published in the English language in the city of SANTA ANA, county of ORANGE, and adjudged a newspaper of general circulation as defined by the laws of the State of California by the Superior Court of the County of ORANGE, State of California, under date 06/20/1922, Case No. 13421. That the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
09/12/2025
09/12/2025
ORANGE
!A000007203155!
Email

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC

RESOURCES COMMISSION
The City of Santa Ana encourages the
public to participate in the decisionmaking process. We encourage you to contact us prior to the Public Hearing if
you have any questions.

Historic Resources Commission
Action: The Historic Resources
Commission will hold a Public Hearing to
receive public testimony, and will take
action on the item described below. Their
decision is final unless appealed to the
City Council within 10 days of the decision
by any interested party or group.

Project Location: 433 West Santa Clara
Avenue located within the Single-Family
Residence (R1) zoning district.

Project Applicant: E. Thomas Chappell
(Property Owner & Applicant)
Project Description: Request for
approval of Historic Resources
Commission Application (HRCA) No.
2025-08, Historic Register Categorization
(HRC) No. 2025-10, and Historic Property
Preservation Application (HPPA) No.
2025-10 to allow the placement and
categorization of the subject property in
the Santa Ana Register of Historical
Properties as “Key” and to execute a
Historic Property Preservation Agreement
with the City of Santa Ana.

Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the
California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the
project is exempt from further review
under Section 15331 (Class 31), as these
actions are designed to preserve historic
resources. A Categorical Exemption, ER
No. 2025-78 will be filed for this project. Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Tuesday, September 23, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in-person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa-ana.org/pb/meeting- participation. Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to [email protected] (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Gema Zapien, Acting Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record. Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa- ana.primegov.com/public/portal. Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact case planner James Williams with the Planning and Building Agency by email at [email protected] or by phone at 714-647-5899. Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of
the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the
public hearing.

Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de
llamar a Gema Zapien al (714) 667-
2732.

N  u c  n liên l  c b  ng ti  ng Vi  t,
xin i  n tho  i cho Kristie Ha (714)
667-2206.
9/12/25
OR-3965548#
City Council 13 – 218 11/4/2025

CITY OF SANTA ANA
Planning and Building Agency
20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
www.santa-ana.org/pba

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

BEFORE THE SANTA ANA HISTORIC RESOURCES COMMISSION
Historic Resources Commission Action: The Historic Resources Commission will hold a Public Hearing to receive public testimony, and will take action on the item described below. Their decision is final unless appealed to the City Council within 10 days of the decision by any interested party or group.

Project Location: 433 West Santa Clara Avenue located within the Single-Family Residence (R1) zoning district.

Project Applicant: E. Thomas Chappell (Property Owner & Applicant) Project Description: Request for approval of Historic Resources Commission Application (HRCA) No. 2025-08, Historic Register Categorization (HRC) No. 2025-10, and Historic Property Preservation Application (HPPA) No. 2025-10 to allow the placement and categorization of the subject property in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties as “Key” and to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement with the City of Santa Ana.

Environmental Impact: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review under Section 15331 (Class 31), as these actions are designed to preserve historic resources. A Categorical Exemption, ER No. 2025-78 will be filed for this project.

Meeting Details: This matter will be heard on Tuesday, September 23, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber, 22 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Members of the public may attend this meeting in-person or join via Zoom. For the most up to date information on how to participate virtually in this meeting, please visit www.santa-ana.org/pb/meeting-participation.

Written Comments: If you are unable to participate in the meeting, you may send written comments by e-mail to [email protected] (reference the topic in the subject line) or mail to Gema Zapien, Acting Recording Secretary, City of Santa Ana, 20 Civic Center Plaza – M20, Santa Ana, CA 92701. Deadline to submit written comments is 3:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting. Comments received after the deadline may not be distributed to the Commission but will be made part of the record.

Where To Get More Information: Additional details regarding the proposed action(s), including the full text of the discretionary item, may be found on the City website 72 hours prior to the public hearing at: https://santa-ana.primegov.com/public/portal.

Who To Contact For Questions: Should you have any questions, please contact James Williams with the Planning and Building Agency at [email protected].

Note: If you challenge the decision on the above matter, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Historic Resources Commission or City Council of the City of Santa Ana at, or prior to, the public hearing.

City Council 13 – 219 11/4/2025
Si tiene preguntas en español, favor de llamar a Gema Zapien al (714) 667-2732.

Nếu cần liên lạc bằng tiếng Việt, xin điện thoại cho Kristie Ha (714) 667-2206. 500’ RADIUS NOTIFICATION MAP
City Council 13 – 220 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 221 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 222 11/4/2025

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: City Clerk’s Office
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
_________________________________________________________________________

HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT
This Historic Property Preservation Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and DLKC Investments, LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Owner”), owner of real property located at 2520 N. Valencia Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties.

RECITALS
A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the “Mills Act”) to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity.

B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2520 N.

Valencia Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the “Historic Property.”
C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner.

E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 223 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 2 -
will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows:

1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement.

This Agreement shall be effective and commence on November 5, 2025, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below.

2. Renewal.
a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein.
b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party.

Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein.
c. Within 30 days from receipt of City’s notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City’s decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply.

3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property.

During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions:
a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its characterdefining features described in the “Historical Property Description” attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 224 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 3 -
b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition.
c. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character-defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner’s compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. f. Owner shall implement the rehabilitation and restoration work items as discussed in detail in Exhibit D, “Proposed Structure and Site Improvements” and the City Council Historic Property Preservation Agreement (HPPA No. 2025-06) staff report dated November 4, 2025. All work items shall be completed within the first ten years of the Mills Act Agreement, with specific items completed within the first five years including assessing roof, exposed rafters, and rain gutters on residence and carriage house and repainting, repairing, or replacing in-kind, as necessary, in-kind replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval; assessing condition of paint and exterior wall cladding and repainting, repairing, or replacing inkind, replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval; assessing windows on primary and secondary buildings and repainting, repairing, or replacing in-kind, as necessary, repair and replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval. Proof of completion, as requested by the City of Santa Ana, will be required in order to satisfy and maintain the Mills Act Agreement. Staff approval is required before items are amended or removed/replaced from the improvements list.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 225 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 4 -

4. Furnishing of Information.

The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.

5. Cancellation.
a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 ½) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement.
b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. c. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288.

6. Enforcement of Agreement.
a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 226 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 5 -
b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City’s regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder.

7. Binding effect of Agreement.
a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2520 N. Valencia Street, Santa Ana, California, Assessor Parcel Number, 396-421-10, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement.
b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner’s successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument.
c. This property is listed in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Register). In any real property transaction, the owner of this property or the owner’s representative shall provide the buyer of this property with notice that the property is listed on the City’s historic Register.

8. No Compensation.

Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property.

9. Notice.

Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto.

City: City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: City Clerk’s Office
Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 227 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 6 -
Owner: DLKC Investments, LLC
Donald E. Bobo, Jr. and Lynne L. Bobo
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706

10. General Provisions.
a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise.
b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. c. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney’s fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court.
f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 228 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 7 -
g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County.

11. Recordation.

No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange.

12. Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto.

13. Effective Date
This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows}
Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 229 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 230 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 9 -

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.

THAT PORTION OF THE GLASSELL AND CHAPMAN ALLOTMENT IN THE RANCHO

SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 29 OF TRACT NO. 1473, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 45, PAGE 8 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 06' 40"

EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHLINE OF SAID LOT 29, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 03' 00" EAST 16.81 FEET, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 47' 00" EAST 103.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 03' 00" EAST 9.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57' 00" EAST 120.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO A. GUSTLIN, RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 1919 IN BOOK 346, PAGE 286 OF DEEDS; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 2' 30" EAST ALONG THE EAST

LINE OF SAID LAND OF GUSTLIN, TO THE CENTER LINE OF EDGEWOOD ROAD, AS SHOWN ON A MAP OF TRACT NO. 390 RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 37 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30' 30" WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02' 30" WEST 194.40 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND OF GUSTLIN; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30' 30" WEST 220.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAND

DESCRIBED IN DEED TO BONNIE LOU COLE, A MARRIED WOMAN, RECORDED JUNE 1, 1953 IN BOOK 2512, PAGE 137, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 03' 00" WEST 111.00 FEET, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 1473, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

Assessor’s Parcel Number: 396-421-10
Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 231 11/4/2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TAYLOR-GUSTLIN HOUSE
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
NAME Taylor-Gustlin House REF. NO.

ADDRESS 2520 North Valencia Street
CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY
YEAR BUILT Circa 1908 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Landmark HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Park Santiago
CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 3S Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted
Prehistoric Historic Both
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Colonial Revival
The most universal of all American domestic building styles, the Colonial Revival has been popular since the 1876 Centennial celebration in Philadelphia stimulated a patriotic interest in the American architectural past. Whether drawing upon Georgian, Federal, or Dutch Colonial prototypes, Colonial Revival buildings feature rectangular building plans and designs which are usually symmetrical, or at least highly regular and balanced, in composition. Roofs are commonly side-gabled, hipped, or gambreled, sometimes accented with dormers. Porches, one or two stories in height, are often included, mostly as central focal points, and frequently incorporate classical elements such as columns, pilasters, and entablatures. Doorways are adorned with classical surrounds and pediments; sidelights, transoms, and fanlights are not uncommon. Windows are typically double-hung sash, with multiple lights in the upper sash. French doors and Palladian windows are also utilized. Depending on location, Colonial Revival buildings have wood, brick, or stucco exteriors (McAlester, 320-326). A “Classic Box” variant of the Colonial Revival style was popular circa 1894 to 1910 and was generally characterized by two-story box-like massing, a hipped roof (often with centered dormers), boxed eaves, a full or partial front porch with columnar roof supports, and Colonial Revival detailing.

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION:

The Taylor-Gustlin House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its representation of the distinguishing characteristics of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as “Landmark” because it “has a unique architectural significance” as a well-detailed and highly intact example of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2).

EXPLANATION OF CODES:
x California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, “How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources,” September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. x California Register Status Code: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, December 8, 2003.) 3S: Appears eligible for the National Register as an individual property through survey evaluation.

Exhibit B
Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 232 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #______________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #__________________________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial______________________________________________ NRHP Status Code_____________________________________
Other Listings_____________________________________________________________________ Review Code________ Reviewer________________________ Date_______________ Page _1_ of _4_ Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Taylor-Gustlin House P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: †Not for Publication „Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad TCA 1725 Date:
*c. Address 2520 North Valencia Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor’s Parcel Number 396-421-10; SEC 6 T 5 R 9 POR *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) A bellcast, hipped roof crowns this square, two-story Colonial Revival house characterized by the box-like massing indicative of the Classic Box genre. The roof treatment includes carved brackets in the eaves and a centered front-gabled dormer over the façade. Narrow clapboard sheathes the house, with a bracketed overhang between stories. Recessed into the southern two-thirds of the façade, the porch is divided into bays by paired Tuscan columns and wraps the southeast corner of the house in a semicircular configuration. The columns rest on a railing of turned balusters. At the top of six steps in the center of the façade, the entry consists of a glazed door flanked by leaded glass sidelights. A large tripartite window to the left (south) is spanned by a leaded glass transom; a window to the right is a single fixed sash. Other windows are double-hung sash, with muntins arranged in a diamond pattern in the upper sashes. A balustraded balcony over the entry is defined by a segmental arch opening that has been filled with a non-original diamond-paned window. A second balcony tops the semicircular portion of the porch. Paneled detailing distinguishes a brick chimney attached to the south elevation. This highly intact house sits on an art stone foundation, with newer brick retaining walls bordering the front lawn. Northwest of the (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 4.)
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single-family Property *P4. Resources Present: „Building †Structure †Object †Site †District „Element of District †Other P5b. Photo: (view and date)
East elevation
December 2003
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: „historic
Circa 1908
*P7. Owner and Address:

Bobo Trust
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
*P8. Recorded by:

Leslie J. Heumann
SAIC
35 S. Raymond Ave. # 204
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded:

December 31, 2003
*P10. Survey Type:

Intensive Survey Update
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “none”) Les, Kathleen. “2510 and 2520 North Valencia.” Historic Resources Survey, March 1980. *Attachments: †None †Location Map †Sketch Map „Continuation Sheet „Building, Structure, and Object Record †Archaeological Record †District Record †Linear Feature Record †Milling Station Record †Rock Art Record †Artifact Record †Photograph Record † Other (list)
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
P5a. Photo
Exhibit B
Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 233 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #__________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#______________________________________________

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 4 ends

*Resource Name or #: Taylor-Gustlin House
B1. Historic Name: Taylor-Gustlin House
B2. Common Name: Thomsen House
B3. Original Use: Single-family Residence B4. Present Use: Single-family Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): Constructed circa 1908.

April 4, 1933. Rebuild one chimney.

June 25, 1979. Garage and playroom.

October 22, 1979. Replace masonry fireplace.

December 20, 1979. Room addition.

May 6, 1980. Extend retaining wall.

May 4, 1980. Pool and spa.
*B7. Moved? †No „Yes „Unknown Date: 1979 (carriage house) Original Location: 427 Edgewood (house);810 N. French *B8. Related Features:

Carriage house, mature Sycamore tree in front yard.

B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Charles Taylor (attributed) *B10. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: circa 1901-1954 Property Type: Single-family Residence Applicable Criteria: NR: C; CR: 3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Taylor-Gustlin House is architecturally significant as a fine example of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. One of a pair of very similar homes located next to each other on over-sized parcels, the house is also notable as one of the earlier homes in the Park Santiago neighborhood. According to previous research and neighborhood lore, this house and its neighbor (2510 North Valencia Street) were constructed for two elderly sisters, Laura and Mary Taylor, by their brother, Charles Taylor, and were originally identical. City directories list the Taylors on Edgewood Road, with no house (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 4.)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References:

City of Santa Ana Building Permits
Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps
(See Continuation Sheet 4 of 4.)
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Leslie J. Heumann
*Date of Evaluation: December 31, 2003
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
Sketch Map
(This space reserved for official comments.)
Taylor-Gustlin House
2520 North Valencia Street
Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 234 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 3 ends

*Recorded by Leslie J. Heumann, SAIC *Date December 31, 2003 _ Continuation † Update DPR 523L
*P3a. Description (continued):
house, a cross-gabled carriage house crowned by a cupola and weathervane was moved onto the property from 810 North French Street (the Crookshank House) in 1979 and converted into living areas. Mature trees dot this large property, which is enclosed by a non-original wrought iron fence.
*B10. Significance (continued):
numbers, beginning in 1908 and continuing through 1918. In 1922, Abraham Gustlin, a former railroad worker turned rancher, and his wife Lovina were living at 427 Edgewood. By 1925, this house had become 2410 North Valencia. It is not clear if the house was actually moved to make way for an extension of Valencia or if it was merely renumbered when the street was subdivided. The Gustlins remained at this address at least until 1951, according to city building permits. In the 1970s, the property was purchased by Robert and Dorothy Heath, who rehabilitated the house and moved the carriage house from the Crookshank House in French Park. Subsequent owners Doug and Deborah Thomsen continued the rehabilitation.

The Taylor-Gustlin House is located in the Park Santiago neighborhood, near the present northern city limits of Santa Ana and substantially north of the original city core. The neighborhood is bounded by Santiago Creek and Park on the north, East Seventeenth Street on the south, North Lincoln Avenue on the east, North Main Street on the west, and the I-5 freeway on the southwest. In large part these boundaries reflect the transportation lines that were constructed towards the end of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth century, when the Pacific Electric interurban railroad ran up Main Street; the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe tracks followed Lincoln; and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way mirrored the freeway route.

This area remained primarily agricultural well into the 1920s. As of 1905, the city directories listed around twenty households on East Santa Clara, Twentieth Street, “C Street” (now North Santiago Street), North Bush Street and North Main Avenue, the only streets in the area at the time. The vast majority of the residents were ranchers. By 1911, the number of households had increased to about thirty, and Edgewood Road and Valencia Street had been partially laid out, but most residents continued to list “rancher” or “fruit grower” as their occupation in the city directories. This pattern of land use was evident on the 1912 plat map of the City, which illustrated two small, Craftsman era subdivisions along Bush north of Santa Clara and on Valencia and Poinsettia south of Twentieth Street, with the remaining area divided into larger, agricultural parcels held by approximately forty landowners.

While the area east of Santiago Street was not subdivided until after the mid-1920s, most of the present day streets west of Santiago had been laid out when the City was mapped in 1923. Ranching continued to be the most prevalent occupation in the neighborhood, but increasing numbers of professionals, small business owners, merchants, and people in service professions such as painters, electricians, and carpenters made their homes in the western half of the neighborhood during the 1920s and 1930s. The area also attracted several city and county officials, including the City Attorney (Z. B. West, Jr., 321 East Santa Clara Avenue), County Supervisor, First District (C. H. Chapman, 2315 North Santiago Street), County Surveyor (E. H. Irwin, 2407 North Santiago Street), and County Auditor (William C. Jerome, 2422 Poinsettia Street). By April 1942, when the Sanborn Company first mapped the western half of the area, most of the lots had been improved with single-family homes, many in the revival styles popular during the 1920s and 1930s. Subsequent development of the eastern half of the neighborhood and infill construction in the western half displayed the simplified ranch style that emerged following World War II.

The Taylor-Gustlin House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its representation of the distinguishing characteristics of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as “Landmark” because it “has a unique architectural significance” as a well-detailed and highly intact example of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. Notable in this regard are the box-like massing, hipped roof with dormer, Tuscan columns, and highly ornamental treatment of the windows and brackets. All original and restored exterior features of the Taylor-Gustlin House are considered character-defining and should be preserved. These features include, but may not be limited to: sheathing (clapboard); roof configuration and detailing; massing; windows and doors; porch; architectural details (porch supports, window and door surrounds, brackets, etc.); any original landscaping such as fruit trees; and original interior features such as the log cabin patterned hardwood floor.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 235 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 4 ends

*Recorded by Leslie J. Heumann, SAIC *Date December 31, 2003 _ Continuation † Update DPR 523L
*B12. References (continued):

Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998.

Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994.

McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984.

National Register Bulletin 16A. “How to Complete the National Register Registration Form.” Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991.

Office of Historic Preservation. “Instructions for Recording Historical Resources.” Sacramento: March 1995.

Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969.

Armor, Samuel. History of Orange County. Los Angeles: History Record Company, 1921. Page 997.

Park Santiago Neighborhood Association. “The Gingerbread Lane Holiday Home Tour 2002.” Brochure.

Santa Ana Historical Preservation Society. “Home and Garden Tour May 18, 1996.” Brochure.

Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1901-1930.

Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 1932, and 1955. “Preserving the old’s a passion for collectors.” The Register, May 20, 1982. “Modern touch woos and wins Victorian Lady.” Orange County Register, May 27, 1989.

P5a. Photograph:

Carriage House, December 2003.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 236 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
- 1 -
Exhibit C
Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S.

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows:

1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose.

2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible.

3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.

4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment.

These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected.

5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity.

6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures.

7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken.

8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project.

9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, and such design is compatible with Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 237 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
- 2 -
size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment.

10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 238 11/4/2025
Exhibit D: Proposed Structure and Site Improvements (“Work Plan”) 2520 North Valencia Street
Item Year Improvement
1 2026 Assess roof, exposed rafters, and rain gutters on residence and carriage house and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, as necessary, in-kind replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval.
2 2028 Assess condition of paint and exterior wall cladding and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval. 3 2030 Assess windows on primary and secondary buildings and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, as necessary. Window repair and replacement is subject to staff approval. 4 2032 Assess condition of driveway and concrete paths, concrete front steps, and brick site features and repair in-kind as necessary, which Planning Division staff approval.

Docusign Envelope ID: 458163EC-84A3-4992-A7E5-35F8D09FE4C7 City Council 13 – 239 11/4/2025
Planning and Building Agency
Item # 13
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Historic Resources Commission Staff Report
September 23, 2025
Topic: HPPA No. 2025-06 – The Taylor-Gustlin House (2520 N. Valencia Street)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Recommend that the City Council authorize the City Manager and City Clerk to execute a Historic Property Preservation Agreement (Mills Act) with DLKC Investments, LLC, for the property located at 2520 N. Valencia Street, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DLKC Investments, LLC, is requesting approval to execute a Mills Act Agreement with the City of Santa Ana at an existing residence located at 2520 N. Valencia Street that is currently listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties and is categorized as Landmark.

DISCUSSION
Project Location and Site Description
The subject property, known as the Taylor-Gustlin House, consists of an existing two-story Colonial Revival-style residence and a relocated carriage house of a combined 4,529 square feet in size located on a 26,100-square-foot residential lot. The Taylor-Gustlin House was added to the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (“Register”) in 2004 and categorized as “Landmark” (Exhibit 4).

Analysis of the Issues
Ordinance No. NS-2382 authorized the Historic Resources Commission to execute Historic Property Preservation Agreements (HPPA), commonly known as Mills Act agreements, for eligible properties. The property is listed on the Register and categorized as Landmark, making it eligible for a Mills Act Agreement. The agreement provides monetary incentives to the property owner in the form of a property tax reduction in exchange for the owner’s voluntary commitment to maintain the property in a good state of repair as necessary to maintain its character and appearance. Once recorded, the City Council 13 – 240 11/4/2025
HPPA No. 2025-06 – The Taylor-Gustlin House (2520 N. Valencia Street) September 23, 2025

Page 2 ends

agreement generates a different valuation method in determining the property’s assessed value, resulting in tax savings for the owner. Aside from the tax savings, the benefits include:
• Long term preservation of the property and visual improvement to the neighborhood • Allows for a mechanism to provide for property rehabilitation • Provides additional incentive for potential buyers to purchase historic structures • Discourages inappropriate alterations to the property In 2004, the Historic Resources Commission placed the Taylor-Gustlin House on the Register and within the Landmark category for its unique architectural quality as a highly intact residence with the distinguishing characteristics of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. All original and restored exterior features of the Taylor-Gustlin House are considered character-defining and should be preserved. These features include, but may not be limited to: sheathing (clapboard); roof configuration and detailing; massing; windows and doors; porch; architectural details (porch supports, window and door surrounds, brackets, etc.); any original landscaping such as fruit trees; and original interior features such as the log cabin patterned hardwood floor.

The following permits for exterior work have been issued for the property: relocation of the existing carriage house in 1979, construction of garage and playroom in 1979, replacement of masonry fireplace in 1979, rear addition in 1979 construction of pool and spa in 1989, construction of fountain in 1989. No other exterior alterations were documented in City building permits or observed during the site inspection conducted in 2025. During the 2025 site visit, Planning Division staff noted the property was in excellent condition with no historically inappropriate modifications.

Future improvements proposed by Planning Division staff and agreed to by the homeowner during the initial ten years of the Mills Act Agreement include assess roof, exposed rafters, and rain gutters on residence and carriage house and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, as necessary, in-kind replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval; assess condition of paint and exterior wall cladding and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval; assess windows on primary and secondary buildings and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, as necessary, repair and replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval; assess condition of driveway and concrete paths, concrete front steps, and brick site features and repair in-kind as necessary, subject to Planning Division staff approval. Staff will ensure that the proposed work will be performed sensitively and will maintain the property’s character-defining features as part of the Mills Act Agreement for this property.

As part of the Mills Act approval process, staff will work with the applicant to ensure that a bronze plaque is installed honoring and recognizing the structure. The plaque will include the historic name, address, year built, and local historic register designation.

Lastly, the site will be subject to general maintenance and upkeep requirements including, City Council 13 – 241 11/4/2025
HPPA No. 2025-06 – The Taylor-Gustlin House (2520 N. Valencia Street) September 23, 2025

Page 3 ends

but not limited to, replacement or restoration of damaged character-defining features, landscaping upkeep, painting, etc. These improvements will be subject to review and approval by staff. Upon consideration of the application, it is recommended that the City enter into a Historic Property Preservation Agreement.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the CEQA Guidelines, the project is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15331 of the CEQA Guidelines (Class 31 – Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation) as these actions are designed to preserve historic resources. Based on this analysis, a Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2025-75, will be filed for this project.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Historic Property Preservation Agreement will reduce the Property Tax revenue account 01102002-50011 to the City by an estimated $1,000.99 annually, for a period of not less than ten years.

EXHIBITS

1. Mills Act Agreement – 2520 N. Valencia Street

2. Vicinity Map – 2520 N. Valencia Street

3. Site Photos – 2520 N. Valencia Street

4. Action Minutes and Resolution HRC – 2520 N. Valencia Street Submitted By:

James Williams, Contract Planner
Approved By:

Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency City Council 13 – 242 11/4/2025

RECORDING REQUESTED BY
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: City Clerk’s Office
FREE RECORDING PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE § 27383
_________________________________________________________________________

HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERVATION AGREEMENT
This Historic Property Preservation Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the of the State of California (hereinafter referred to as “City”), and DLKC Investments, LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Owner”), owner of real property located at 2520 N. Valencia Street, Santa Ana, California, in the County of Orange and listed on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties.

RECITALS
A. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana is authorized by California Government Code Section 50280 et seq. (known as the “Mills Act”) to enter into contracts with owners of qualified historical properties to provide for appropriate use, maintenance, rehabilitation and restoration such that these historic properties retain their historic character and integrity.

B. The Owner possesses fee title in and to that certain qualified real property together with associated structures and improvements thereon, located at 2520 N.

Valencia Street, Santa Ana, CA, 92706 and more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and hereinafter referred to as the “Historic Property.”
C. The Historic Property is officially designated on the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code.

D. City and Owner, for their mutual benefit, now desire to enter into this Agreement which defines and limits the use and alteration of this Historic Property in order to enhance and maintain its value as a cultural and historical resource for Owner and for the community; to prevent inappropriate alterations to the Historic Property and to ensure that repairs, additions, new building, and other changes are appropriate; and to ensure that rehabilitation and maintenance are carried out in an exemplary manner.

E. Owner and City intend to carry out the purposes of California Government Code, Chapter 1, Part 5 of Division 1 of Title 5, Article 12, Section 50280 et seq., which City Council 13 – 243 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 2 -
will enable the Historic Property to qualify for an assessment of valuation as a restricted historical property pursuant to Article 1.9, Sec. 439 et seq., Chapter 3 Part 2 of Division 1 of the California Tax and Revenue Code.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Santa Ana and the Owner of the Historic Property agree as follows:

1. Effective Date and Terms of Agreement.

This Agreement shall be effective and commence on November 5, 2025, and shall remain in effect for a term of ten (10) years thereafter. Each year, upon the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, such initial term will automatically be extended as provided in California Government Code Sections 50280 through 50290 and in Section 2, below.

2. Renewal.
a. Each year on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement, a year shall automatically be added to the initial ten (10) year term of this Agreement unless written notice of nonrenewal is served as provided herein.
b. If the Owner or the City desire(s) in any year not to renew the Agreement, the Owner or City shall serve written notice of nonrenewal of the Agreement on the other party.

Unless such notice is served by the Owner to the City at least ninety (90) days prior to the annual renewal date, or served by the City to the Owner at least sixty (60) days prior to the annual renewal date, one (1) year shall automatically be added to the term of the Agreement as provided herein.
c. Within 30 days from receipt of City’s notice of nonrenewal, the Owner may file a written protest of City’s decision of nonrenewal. The City may, at any time prior to the annual renewal date of the Agreement, withdraw its notice to the Owner of nonrenewal. d. If either the Owner or the City serves notice to the other of nonrenewal in any year, the Agreement shall remain in effect for the balance of the term then remaining, either from its original execution or from the last renewal of the Agreement, whichever may apply.

3. Standards and Conditions for Historic Property.

During the term of this Agreement, the Historic Property shall be subject to the following conditions, requirements and restrictions:
a. Owner shall maintain the Historic Property in a good state of repair and shall preserve, maintain, and, where necessary, restore or rehabilitate the property and its characterdefining features described in the “Historical Property Description” attached hereto, marked as Exhibit B, notably the general architectural form, style, materials, design, scale, proportions, organization of windows, doors, and other openings, textures, details, mass, roof line, porch and other aspects of the appearance of the exterior to the satisfaction of the City.

City Council 13 – 244 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 3 -
b. All changes to the Historic Property shall comply with applicable City plans and regulations, and conform to the rules and regulations of the Office of Historic Preservation of the State Department of Parks and Recreation, namely the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Historic Preservation Projects. These guidelines are attached hereto, marked as Exhibit C, and incorporated herein by this reference. Owner shall continually maintain the Historic Property in the same or better condition.
c. A view corridor enabling the general public to see the Historic Property from the public right-of-way shall be maintained, and Owner shall not be permitted to block the view corridor to the property with any new structure, such as walls, fences or shrubbery, so as to prevent the viewing of the historic landmark by the public. d. The following are prohibited: demolition of the Historic Property or destruction of character-defining features of the building or site; removal of trees and other major vegetation unless removal is approved by a rehabilitation plan approved by the Historic Resources Commission; paving of yard surface; exterior alterations or additions unless approved by the Historic Resources Commission and such alterations are in keeping with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards; deteriorating, dilapidated or unrepaired structures such as fences, roofs, doors, walls, and windows; storage of junk, trash, debris, discarded or unused objects such as cars, appliances, or furniture; and other unsightly by decoration, structure or vegetation which is unsightly by reason of its height, condition, or inappropriate location. e. Owner shall allow reasonable periodic inspection by prior appointment, as needed or at least every five (5) years after the initial inspection, of the interior and exterior of the Historic Property by representatives of the City of Santa Ana, the County Assessor, the State Department of Parks and Recreation, and the State Board of Equalization, to determine the Owner’s compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement. f. Owner shall implement the rehabilitation and restoration work items as discussed in detail in Exhibit D, “Proposed Structure and Site Improvements” and the City Council Historic Property Preservation Agreement (HPPA No. 2025-06) staff report dated November 4, 2025. All work items shall be completed within the first ten years of the Mills Act Agreement, with specific items completed within the first five years including assessing roof, exposed rafters, and rain gutters on residence and carriage house and repainting, repairing, or replacing in-kind, as necessary, in-kind replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval; assessing condition of paint and exterior wall cladding and repainting, repairing, or replacing inkind, replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval; assessing windows on primary and secondary buildings and repainting, repairing, or replacing in-kind, as necessary, repair and replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval. Proof of completion, as requested by the City of Santa Ana, will be required in order to satisfy and maintain the Mills Act Agreement. Staff approval is required before items are amended or removed/replaced from the improvements list.

City Council 13 – 245 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 4 -

4. Furnishing of Information.

The Owner hereby agrees to furnish the City with any and all information requested which may be necessary or advisable to determine compliance with the terms and provisions of this Agreement.

5. Cancellation.
a. The City, following a duly noticed public hearing by the City Council as set forth in Government Code Section 50280, et. seq., may cancel this Agreement if it determines that the Owner have breached any of the conditions of this Agreement, or has allowed the property to deteriorate to the point that it no longer meets the standards for a qualified Historic Property, or if the City determines that the Owner have failed to restore or rehabilitate the property in the manner specified in Section 3 of this Agreement. If a contract is cancelled for these reasons, the Owner shall pay a cancellation fee to the County Auditor as set forth in Government Code Section 50286. This cancellation fee shall be a percentage (currently set at twelve and one-half (12 ½) percent by Government Code Section 50286) of the current fair market value of the property at the time of the cancellation, as determined by the county assessor, without regard to any restriction imposed pursuant to this Agreement.
b. If the Historic Property is destroyed by earthquake, fire, flood or other natural disaster such that in the opinion of the City Building Official more than sixty (60) percent of the original fabric of the structure must be replaced, this Agreement shall be canceled immediately because, in effect, the historic value of the structure will have been destroyed. No fee shall be imposed in the case of destruction by acts of God or natural disaster. c. If the Historic Property is acquired by eminent domain and the City Council determines that the acquisition frustrates the purpose of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be cancelled and no fee imposed, as specified in Government Code Section 50288.

6. Enforcement of Agreement.
a. In lieu of and/or in addition to any provisions to cancel the Agreement as referenced herein, City may specifically enforce, or enjoin the breach of, the terms of the Agreement. In the event of a default, under the provisions to cancel the Agreement by Owner, the City shall give written notice to Owner by registered or certified mail, and if such a violation is not corrected to the reasonable satisfaction of the City Manager or designee within thirty (30) days thereafter, or if not corrected within such a reasonable time as may be required to cure the breach or default, or default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days (provided that acts to cure the breach or default may be commenced within thirty (30) days and shall thereafter be diligently pursued to completion by Owner), then City may, without further notice, declare a default under the terms of this Agreement and may bring any action necessary to specifically enforce the obligations of Owner growing out of the terms of this Agreement, apply to any court, state or federal, for injunctive relief against any violation by Owner or apply for such relief as may be appropriate.

City Council 13 – 246 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 5 -
b. City does not waive any claim of default by the Owner if City does not enforce or cancel this Agreement. All other remedies at law or in equity which are not otherwise provided for in this Agreement or in City’s regulations governing historic properties are available to City to pursue in the event that there is a breach of this Agreement. No waiver by City of any breach or default under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach thereof or default hereunder.

7. Binding effect of Agreement.
a. Owner hereby subjects the Historic Property, located at 2520 N. Valencia Street, Santa Ana, California, Assessor Parcel Number, 396-421-10, and more particularly described in Exhibit A, in the City of Santa Ana, to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions as set forth in this Agreement.
b. City and Owner hereby declare their specific intent that the covenants, conditions and restrictions as set forth herein shall be deemed covenants running with the land and shall pass to and be binding upon Owner’s successors and assigns in title or interest to the Historic Property. Every contract, deed, or other instrument hereinafter executed, covering or conveying the Historic Property or any portion thereof, shall conclusively be held to have been executed, delivered, and accepted subject to the tenants, restrictions, and reservations expressed in this Agreement regardless of whether such covenants, conditions and restrictions are set forth in such contract, deed, or other instrument.
c. This property is listed in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties (Register). In any real property transaction, the owner of this property or the owner’s representative shall provide the buyer of this property with notice that the property is listed on the City’s historic Register.

8. No Compensation.

Owner shall not receive any payment from City in consideration of the obligation imposed under this Agreement, it being recognized that the consideration for the execution of this Agreement is the substantial public benefit to be derived therefrom and the advantage that will accrue to Owner as a result of the effect upon the assessed value of the Property on the account of the restrictions on the use and preservation of the Property.

9. Notice.

Any notice required by the terms of this Agreement shall be sent to the address of the respective parties as specified below or at other addresses that may be later specified by the parties hereto.

City: City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Attn: City Clerk’s Office
City Council 13 – 247 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 6 -
Owner: DLKC Investments, LLC
Donald E. Bobo, Jr. and Lynne L. Bobo
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706

10. General Provisions.
a. None of the terms, provisions, or conditions of this Agreement shall be deemed to create a partnership between the parties hereto and any of their heirs, successors, or assigns, nor shall such terms, provisions or conditions cause them to be considered joint ventures or members of any joint enterprise.
b. The Owner agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees harmless from liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect use or operations of the Owner or those of his or her contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee, or other person acting on his or her behalf which relates to the use, operation, and maintenance of the Historic Property. The Owner hereby agrees to and shall defend the City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, and employees with respect to any and all actions for damages caused by, or alleged to have been caused by, reason of the Owner's activities in connection with the Historic Property. c. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damages suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, and costs of defense incurred, by reason of the operations referred to in this Agreement regardless of whether or not City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Historic Property. d. All of the agreements, rights, covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties herein, their heirs, successors, legal representatives, assigns, and all persons acquiring any part or portion of the Historic Property, whether by operation of law on in any manner whatsoever. e. In the event legal proceedings are brought by any party or parties to enforce or restrain a violation of any of the covenants, reservations, or restrictions contained herein, or to determine the rights and duties of any party hereunder, the prevailing party in such proceeding may recover all reasonable attorney’s fees to be fixed by the court, in addition to court costs and other relief ordered by the court.
f. In the event that any of the provisions of this Agreement are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, or by subsequent preemptive legislation, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions, or portions thereof, shall not be effected thereby.

City Council 13 – 248 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 7 -
g. This Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, with venue in Orange County.

11. Recordation.

No later than twenty (20) days after the parties execute and enter into this Agreement, the City shall cause this Agreement to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Orange.

12. Amendments.

This Agreement may be amended, in whole or in part, only by a written recorded instrument executed by the parties hereto.

13. Effective Date
This Agreement shall be effective on the day and year first written above in Section 1. {Signature page follows}
City Council 13 – 249 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 8 -
ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
________________________ _________________________
JENNIFER L. HALL ALVARO NUÑEZ
City Clerk City Manager
OWNERS
Date: ______________________ _________________________

DLKC INVESTMENTS, LLC
DONALD E. BOBO
Date: ______________________ _________________________

DLKC INVESTMENTS, LLC
LYNNE L. BOBO
APPROVED AS TO FORM: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:

SONIA CARVALHO
City Attorney
By: _____________________ _____________________

BRANDON SALVATIERRA ALI PEZESHKPOUR
Deputy City Attorney Executive Director
Planning and Building Agency
City Council 13 – 250 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
- 9 -

EXHIBIT A

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.

THAT PORTION OF THE GLASSELL AND CHAPMAN ALLOTMENT IN THE RANCHO

SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 29 OF TRACT NO. 1473, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 45, PAGE 8 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 06' 40"

EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE NORTHLINE OF SAID LOT 29, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 03' 00" EAST 16.81 FEET, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 47' 00" EAST 103.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 03' 00" EAST 9.90 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57' 00" EAST 120.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED TO A. GUSTLIN, RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 1919 IN BOOK 346, PAGE 286 OF DEEDS; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 2' 30" EAST ALONG THE EAST

LINE OF SAID LAND OF GUSTLIN, TO THE CENTER LINE OF EDGEWOOD ROAD, AS SHOWN ON A MAP OF TRACT NO. 390 RECORDED IN BOOK 15, PAGE 37 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30' 30" WEST ALONG SAID CENTER LINE, A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02' 30" WEST 194.40 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID LAND OF GUSTLIN; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30' 30" WEST 220.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LAND

DESCRIBED IN DEED TO BONNIE LOU COLE, A MARRIED WOMAN, RECORDED JUNE 1, 1953 IN BOOK 2512, PAGE 137, OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 03' 00" WEST 111.00 FEET, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. 1473, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.

Assessor’s Parcel Number: 396-421-10
City Council 13 – 251 11/4/2025

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TAYLOR-GUSTLIN HOUSE
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
NAME Taylor-Gustlin House REF. NO.

ADDRESS 2520 North Valencia Street
CITY Santa Ana ZIP 92706 ORANGE COUNTY
YEAR BUILT Circa 1908 LOCAL REGISTER CATEGORY: Landmark HISTORIC DISTRICT N/A NEIGHBORHOOD Park Santiago
CALIFORNIA REGISTER CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION 3 CALIFORNIA REGISTER STATUS CODE 3S Location: Not for Publication Unrestricted
Prehistoric Historic Both
ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Colonial Revival
The most universal of all American domestic building styles, the Colonial Revival has been popular since the 1876 Centennial celebration in Philadelphia stimulated a patriotic interest in the American architectural past. Whether drawing upon Georgian, Federal, or Dutch Colonial prototypes, Colonial Revival buildings feature rectangular building plans and designs which are usually symmetrical, or at least highly regular and balanced, in composition. Roofs are commonly side-gabled, hipped, or gambreled, sometimes accented with dormers. Porches, one or two stories in height, are often included, mostly as central focal points, and frequently incorporate classical elements such as columns, pilasters, and entablatures. Doorways are adorned with classical surrounds and pediments; sidelights, transoms, and fanlights are not uncommon. Windows are typically double-hung sash, with multiple lights in the upper sash. French doors and Palladian windows are also utilized. Depending on location, Colonial Revival buildings have wood, brick, or stucco exteriors (McAlester, 320-326). A “Classic Box” variant of the Colonial Revival style was popular circa 1894 to 1910 and was generally characterized by two-story box-like massing, a hipped roof (often with centered dormers), boxed eaves, a full or partial front porch with columnar roof supports, and Colonial Revival detailing.

SUMMARY/CONCLUSION:

The Taylor-Gustlin House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its representation of the distinguishing characteristics of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as “Landmark” because it “has a unique architectural significance” as a well-detailed and highly intact example of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style (Municipal Code, Section 30-2.2).

EXPLANATION OF CODES:
x California Register Criteria for Evaluation: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, Technical Assistance Series # 7, “How to Nominate Resources to the California Register of Historical Resources,” September 4, 2001.) 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values. x California Register Status Code: (From California Office of Historic Preservation, December 8, 2003.) 3S: Appears eligible for the National Register as an individual property through survey evaluation.

Exhibit B
City Council 13 – 252 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #______________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI #__________________________________________________ PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial______________________________________________ NRHP Status Code_____________________________________
Other Listings_____________________________________________________________________ Review Code________ Reviewer________________________ Date_______________ Page _1_ of _4_ Resource name(s) or number (assigned by recorder) Taylor-Gustlin House P1. Other Identifier:
*P2. Location: †Not for Publication „Unrestricted *a. County Orange County *b. USGS 7.5’ Quad TCA 1725 Date:
*c. Address 2520 North Valencia Street City Santa Ana Zip 92706 *e. Other Locational Data: Assessor’s Parcel Number 396-421-10; SEC 6 T 5 R 9 POR *P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries.) A bellcast, hipped roof crowns this square, two-story Colonial Revival house characterized by the box-like massing indicative of the Classic Box genre. The roof treatment includes carved brackets in the eaves and a centered front-gabled dormer over the façade. Narrow clapboard sheathes the house, with a bracketed overhang between stories. Recessed into the southern two-thirds of the façade, the porch is divided into bays by paired Tuscan columns and wraps the southeast corner of the house in a semicircular configuration. The columns rest on a railing of turned balusters. At the top of six steps in the center of the façade, the entry consists of a glazed door flanked by leaded glass sidelights. A large tripartite window to the left (south) is spanned by a leaded glass transom; a window to the right is a single fixed sash. Other windows are double-hung sash, with muntins arranged in a diamond pattern in the upper sashes. A balustraded balcony over the entry is defined by a segmental arch opening that has been filled with a non-original diamond-paned window. A second balcony tops the semicircular portion of the porch. Paneled detailing distinguishes a brick chimney attached to the south elevation. This highly intact house sits on an art stone foundation, with newer brick retaining walls bordering the front lawn. Northwest of the (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 4.)
*P3b. Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) HP2. Single-family Property *P4. Resources Present: „Building †Structure †Object †Site †District „Element of District †Other P5b. Photo: (view and date)
East elevation
December 2003
*P6. Date Constructed/Age and
Sources: „historic
Circa 1908
*P7. Owner and Address:

Bobo Trust
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92706
*P8. Recorded by:

Leslie J. Heumann
SAIC
35 S. Raymond Ave. # 204
Pasadena, CA 91105
*P9. Date Recorded:

December 31, 2003
*P10. Survey Type:

Intensive Survey Update
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “none”) Les, Kathleen. “2510 and 2520 North Valencia.” Historic Resources Survey, March 1980. *Attachments: †None †Location Map †Sketch Map „Continuation Sheet „Building, Structure, and Object Record †Archaeological Record †District Record †Linear Feature Record †Milling Station Record †Rock Art Record †Artifact Record †Photograph Record † Other (list)
DPR 523A (1/95) *Required information
P5a. Photo
Exhibit B
City Council 13 – 253 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary #__________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI#______________________________________________

BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD

Page 2 of 4 ends

*Resource Name or #: Taylor-Gustlin House
B1. Historic Name: Taylor-Gustlin House
B2. Common Name: Thomsen House
B3. Original Use: Single-family Residence B4. Present Use: Single-family Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Colonial Revival
*B6. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations): Constructed circa 1908.

April 4, 1933. Rebuild one chimney.

June 25, 1979. Garage and playroom.

October 22, 1979. Replace masonry fireplace.

December 20, 1979. Room addition.

May 6, 1980. Extend retaining wall.

May 4, 1980. Pool and spa.
*B7. Moved? †No „Yes „Unknown Date: 1979 (carriage house) Original Location: 427 Edgewood (house);810 N. French *B8. Related Features:

Carriage house, mature Sycamore tree in front yard.

B9a. Architect: Unknown b. Builder: Charles Taylor (attributed) *B10. Significance: Theme Residential Architecture Area Santa Ana Period of Significance: circa 1901-1954 Property Type: Single-family Residence Applicable Criteria: NR: C; CR: 3 (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic scope. Also address integrity) The Taylor-Gustlin House is architecturally significant as a fine example of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. One of a pair of very similar homes located next to each other on over-sized parcels, the house is also notable as one of the earlier homes in the Park Santiago neighborhood. According to previous research and neighborhood lore, this house and its neighbor (2510 North Valencia Street) were constructed for two elderly sisters, Laura and Mary Taylor, by their brother, Charles Taylor, and were originally identical. City directories list the Taylors on Edgewood Road, with no house (See Continuation Sheet 3 of 4.)
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) *B12. References:

City of Santa Ana Building Permits
Santa Ana History Room Collection, Santa Ana Public Library Sanborn Maps
(See Continuation Sheet 4 of 4.)
B13. Remarks:
*B14. Evaluator: Leslie J. Heumann
*Date of Evaluation: December 31, 2003
DPR 523B (1/95) *Required information
Sketch Map
(This space reserved for official comments.)
Taylor-Gustlin House
2520 North Valencia Street
City Council 13 – 254 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 3 ends

*Recorded by Leslie J. Heumann, SAIC *Date December 31, 2003 _ Continuation † Update DPR 523L
*P3a. Description (continued):
house, a cross-gabled carriage house crowned by a cupola and weathervane was moved onto the property from 810 North French Street (the Crookshank House) in 1979 and converted into living areas. Mature trees dot this large property, which is enclosed by a non-original wrought iron fence.
*B10. Significance (continued):
numbers, beginning in 1908 and continuing through 1918. In 1922, Abraham Gustlin, a former railroad worker turned rancher, and his wife Lovina were living at 427 Edgewood. By 1925, this house had become 2410 North Valencia. It is not clear if the house was actually moved to make way for an extension of Valencia or if it was merely renumbered when the street was subdivided. The Gustlins remained at this address at least until 1951, according to city building permits. In the 1970s, the property was purchased by Robert and Dorothy Heath, who rehabilitated the house and moved the carriage house from the Crookshank House in French Park. Subsequent owners Doug and Deborah Thomsen continued the rehabilitation.

The Taylor-Gustlin House is located in the Park Santiago neighborhood, near the present northern city limits of Santa Ana and substantially north of the original city core. The neighborhood is bounded by Santiago Creek and Park on the north, East Seventeenth Street on the south, North Lincoln Avenue on the east, North Main Street on the west, and the I-5 freeway on the southwest. In large part these boundaries reflect the transportation lines that were constructed towards the end of the nineteenth century and at the beginning of the twentieth century, when the Pacific Electric interurban railroad ran up Main Street; the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe tracks followed Lincoln; and the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way mirrored the freeway route.

This area remained primarily agricultural well into the 1920s. As of 1905, the city directories listed around twenty households on East Santa Clara, Twentieth Street, “C Street” (now North Santiago Street), North Bush Street and North Main Avenue, the only streets in the area at the time. The vast majority of the residents were ranchers. By 1911, the number of households had increased to about thirty, and Edgewood Road and Valencia Street had been partially laid out, but most residents continued to list “rancher” or “fruit grower” as their occupation in the city directories. This pattern of land use was evident on the 1912 plat map of the City, which illustrated two small, Craftsman era subdivisions along Bush north of Santa Clara and on Valencia and Poinsettia south of Twentieth Street, with the remaining area divided into larger, agricultural parcels held by approximately forty landowners.

While the area east of Santiago Street was not subdivided until after the mid-1920s, most of the present day streets west of Santiago had been laid out when the City was mapped in 1923. Ranching continued to be the most prevalent occupation in the neighborhood, but increasing numbers of professionals, small business owners, merchants, and people in service professions such as painters, electricians, and carpenters made their homes in the western half of the neighborhood during the 1920s and 1930s. The area also attracted several city and county officials, including the City Attorney (Z. B. West, Jr., 321 East Santa Clara Avenue), County Supervisor, First District (C. H. Chapman, 2315 North Santiago Street), County Surveyor (E. H. Irwin, 2407 North Santiago Street), and County Auditor (William C. Jerome, 2422 Poinsettia Street). By April 1942, when the Sanborn Company first mapped the western half of the area, most of the lots had been improved with single-family homes, many in the revival styles popular during the 1920s and 1930s. Subsequent development of the eastern half of the neighborhood and infill construction in the western half displayed the simplified ranch style that emerged following World War II.

The Taylor-Gustlin House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its representation of the distinguishing characteristics of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. Additionally, the house has been categorized as “Landmark” because it “has a unique architectural significance” as a well-detailed and highly intact example of the Classic Box variant of the Colonial Revival style. Notable in this regard are the box-like massing, hipped roof with dormer, Tuscan columns, and highly ornamental treatment of the windows and brackets. All original and restored exterior features of the Taylor-Gustlin House are considered character-defining and should be preserved. These features include, but may not be limited to: sheathing (clapboard); roof configuration and detailing; massing; windows and doors; porch; architectural details (porch supports, window and door surrounds, brackets, etc.); any original landscaping such as fruit trees; and original interior features such as the log cabin patterned hardwood floor.

City Council 13 – 255 11/4/2025
State of California  The Resources Agency Primary # _____________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # ________________________________________________ CONTINUATION SHEET Trinomial _____________________________________________

Page 4 ends

*Recorded by Leslie J. Heumann, SAIC *Date December 31, 2003 _ Continuation † Update DPR 523L
*B12. References (continued):

Harris, Cyril M. American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. New York, WW Norton, 1998.

Marsh, Diann. Santa Ana, An Illustrated History. Encinitas, Heritage Publishing, 1994.

McAlester, Virginia and Lee. A Field Guide to American Houses. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1984.

National Register Bulletin 16A. “How to Complete the National Register Registration Form.” Washington DC: National Register Branch, National Park Service, US Dept. of the Interior, 1991.

Office of Historic Preservation. “Instructions for Recording Historical Resources.” Sacramento: March 1995.

Whiffen, Marcus. American Architecture Since 1780. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1969.

Armor, Samuel. History of Orange County. Los Angeles: History Record Company, 1921. Page 997.

Park Santiago Neighborhood Association. “The Gingerbread Lane Holiday Home Tour 2002.” Brochure.

Santa Ana Historical Preservation Society. “Home and Garden Tour May 18, 1996.” Brochure.

Santa Ana and Orange County Directories, 1901-1930.

Historic Maps, Santa Ana History Room, 1912, 1923, 1932, and 1955. “Preserving the old’s a passion for collectors.” The Register, May 20, 1982. “Modern touch woos and wins Victorian Lady.” Orange County Register, May 27, 1989.

P5a. Photograph:

Carriage House, December 2003.

City Council 13 – 256 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
- 1 -
Exhibit C
Exterior work shall be reviewed by the Historic Resources Commission and subject to the U.S.

Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation of Historic Buildings, as follows:

1. Every reasonable effort shall be made to provide a compatible use for a property which requires minimal alteration of the building, structure, or site and its environment, or to use a property for its originally intended purpose.

2. The distinguishing original qualities or character of a building, structure or site and its environment shall not be destroyed. The removal or alteration of any historic material or distinctive architectural features should be avoided when possible.

3. All buildings, structures, and sites shall be recognized as products of their own time. Alterations that have no historical basis and which seek to create an earlier appearance shall be discouraged.

4. Changes which may have taken place in the course of time are evidence of the history and development of a building, structure, or site and its environment.

These changes may have acquired significance in their own right, and this significance shall be recognized and respected.

5. Distinctive stylistic features or examples of skilled craftsmanship which characterize a building, structure, or site shall be treated with sensitivity.

6. Deteriorated architectural features shall be repaired rather than replaced, whenever possible. In the event replacement is necessary, the new material should match the material being replaced in composition, design, color, texture, and other visual qualities. Repair or replacement of missing architectural features should be based on accurate duplications of features, substantiated by historic, physical, or pictorial evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the availability of different architectural elements from the other buildings or structures.

7. The surface cleaning of structures shall be undertaken with the gentlest means possible. Sandblasting and other cleaning methods that will damage the historic building materials shall not be undertaken.

8. Every reasonable effort shall be made to protect and reserve archaeological resources affected by, or adjacent to any project.

9. Contemporary design for alterations and additions to existing properties shall not be discouraged when such alterations and additions do not destroy significant historical, architectural or cultural material, and such design is compatible with City Council 13 – 257 11/4/2025

MILLS ACT AGREEMENT
2520 North Valencia Street
Santa Ana, CA 92701
- 2 -
size, scale, color, material and character of the property, neighborhood, or environment.

10. Wherever possible, new additions or alterations to structures shall be done in such a manner that if such additions or alterations need to be removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the structure would be unimpaired.

City Council 13 – 258 11/4/2025
Exhibit D: Proposed Structure and Site Improvements (“Work Plan”) 2520 North Valencia Street
Item Year Improvement
1 2026 Assess roof, exposed rafters, and rain gutters on residence and carriage house and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, as necessary, in-kind replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval.
2 2028 Assess condition of paint and exterior wall cladding and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, replacement being subject to Planning Division staff approval. 3 2030 Assess windows on primary and secondary buildings and repaint, repair, or replace in-kind, as necessary. Window repair and replacement is subject to staff approval. 4 2032 Assess condition of driveway and concrete paths, concrete front steps, and brick site features and repair in-kind as necessary, which Planning Division staff approval.

City Council 13 – 259 11/4/2025

P L A N N I N G AND B U I L D I N G A G E N C Y
SITE
500’ RADIUS
HPPA NO. 2025-06
2520 NORTH VALENCIA STREET

THE TAYLOR-GUSTLIN HOUSE
City Council 13 – 260 11/4/2025
HPPA-2025-06
The Taylor-Gustlin House – 2520 N. Valencia Street

SITE PHOTOS
EXHIBIT 3
City Council 13 – 261 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 262 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 263 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 264 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 265 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 266 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 267 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 268 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 269 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 270 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 271 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 272 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 273 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 274 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 275 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 276 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 277 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 278 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 279 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 280 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 281 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 282 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 283 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 284 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 285 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 286 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 287 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 288 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 289 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 290 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 291 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 292 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 293 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 294 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 295 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 296 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 297 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 298 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 299 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 300 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 301 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 302 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 303 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 304 11/4/2025
City Council 13 – 305 11/4/2025
Police Department
www.santa-ana.org/pd
Item # 14
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
November 4, 2025
TOPIC: Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant Funds

AGENDA TITLE
Appropriation Adjustment and Agreement Accepting $702,000 from the State Office of Traffic Safety for Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety for the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program for a oneyear period beginning October 1, 2025 through September 30 2026, in an amount not to exceed $702,000 (Agreement No. A-2025-XXX).

2. Approve an appropriation adjustment accepting $702,000 in the Office of Traffic Safety, Federal Grant-Indirect revenue account and appropriate same to the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program expenditure accounts. (Requires five affirmative votes)
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Santa Ana Police Department has been awarded $702,000 in grant funding from the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) under the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP). This one-year agreement covers the program period from October 1, 2025 through September 30, 2026. The goal of OTS STEP is to reduce the number of fatalities and injuries in crashes involving alcohol, drug, speed, red-light violations, distracted driving, and other primary collision factors. To accomplish these goals, the program will fund both education and enforcement activities.

The enforcement activities will follow proven “best practice” strategies and will be conducted on an overtime basis. The funded strategies will include Driving Under the Influence (DUI) checkpoints, DUI saturation patrols, as well as DUI enforcement operations in collaboration with neighboring cities to apprehend impaired drivers. The program will also concentrate on bicycle/pedestrian safety, speed violations, aggressive driving, and seat belt enforcement.

City Council 14 – 1 11/4/2025
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program Grant Funds
November 4, 2025

Page 2 ends

The educational portion of the grant will include funding for Police Department staff to facilitate multi-media presentations at local schools in partnership with the Santa Ana Unified School District. Promotional and educational materials will be made available to support ongoing outreach programs already in place. This grant also includes funding to purchase bicycle helmets for distribution to community members during outreach and education events.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the appropriation adjustment will recognize $702,000 in the Office of Traffic Safety, Federal Grant-Indirect revenue account (no. 16514002-52001) and appropriate same in the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program expenditure account (nos. 16514414-various) for projected expenditures as follows:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit
- Account No. Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount FY 25-26
(Nov.-June)
16514414-
Various
Office of Traffic
Safety Grant
Selective Traffic
Enforcement,
Various
$468,000
FY 26-27
(July-Sept.)
16514414-
Various
Office of Traffic
Safety Grant
Selective Traffic
Enforcement,
Various
$234,000
Total $702,000
The amounts shown in each fiscal year are estimates only. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for approval of carryovers to FY 2026-27.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Grant Agreement with Office of Traffic Safety
Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Police Chief
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 14 – 2 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 1 of 24
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT

GRANT NUMBER
PT26193

1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)

2. NAME OF AGENCY 3. Grant Period
Santa Ana From:

To:
10/01/2025
09/30/2026 4. AGENCY UNIT TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Santa Ana Police Department

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
Best practice strategies will be conducted to reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol and other primary crash factors. The funded strategies may include impaired driving enforcement, enforcement operations focusing on primary crash factors, distracted driving, night-time seat belt enforcement, special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety, enforcement and public awareness in areas with a high number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes, and educational programs. These strategies are designed to earn media attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect. In addition, the department will participate in community collaboration and engagement activities to engage in conversations regarding traffic safety with community members.

6. Federal Funds Allocated Under This Agreement Shall Not Exceed:

Allocation is contingent upon availability of federal funds. $702,000.00

7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this reference made a part of the Agreement:
 Schedule A – Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives and Method of Procedure  Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate and Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable)  Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative and Sub-Budget Narrative (if applicable)  Exhibit A – Certifications and Assurances
 Exhibit B* – OTS Grant Program Manual
 Exhibit C – Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access *Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto. These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

8. Approval Signatures
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL
NAME:

TITLE:

EMAIL:

PHONE:

ADDRESS:

Joseph Marty
Commander
[email protected]
(714) 245-8274
60 Civic Center Plaza
PO Box 1981
Santa Ana, CA 92702
ADDRESS: Alvaro Nunez
City Manager
[email protected]
(714) 647-5200
60 Civic Center Plaza
PO Box 1981
Santa Ana, CA 92702

(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
C. FISCAL OFFICIAL D. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY ADDRESS: Alexander Trinidad
Director of Finance and Management Svcs (MM)
[email protected]
(714) 647-5295
20 Civic Center Plaza
PO Box 1981
Santa Ana, CA 92702
ADDRESS: Stephanie Dougherty
Director
[email protected]
(916) 509-3030
2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300
Elk Grove, CA 95758

(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 1 – 3 11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page
2 of 24 City Council 14 – 4 11/4/2025
City Council 14 – 5 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 4 of 24
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule A

GRANT NUMBER
PT26193

1. PROBLEM STATEMENT
Describe the city, county, or jurisdiction this grant will impact.

The City of Santa Ana, located in central Orange County, California, serves as the county seat and is known for its vibrant culture and rich history. With a population of approximately 310,000 residents, Santa Ana is the third most populous city in the county, following Anaheim and Irvine. Covering about 27.5 square miles, the city features a diverse mix of residential neighborhoods, commercial centers, and industrial areas.

Santa Ana plays a key role in Orange County’s public sector and educational landscape, hosting numerous government offices and institutions. The city has a predominantly Latino population, which contributes significantly to its cultural identity and community life. Santa Ana is home to historic landmarks such as the Old Orange County Courthouse and the Santa Ana Zoo, as well as modern destinations like MainPlace Mall and a growing downtown arts district.

Due to its central location and proximity to major highways including Interstate 5 and State Routes 22 and 55, Santa Ana experiences high volumes of commuter traffic. This results in ongoing challenges related to traffic safety, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists. The Santa Ana Police Department actively addresses these concerns through enforcement, public education, and community engagement initiatives aimed at improving roadway safety for all users.

Describe the problem(s) to be addressed, supported by current and relevant crash data. (most recent calendar year data/stats).

Santa Ana consistently reports a higher-than-average rate of traffic crashes compared to other cities of similar size. These incidents frequently involve speeding, impaired driving, and failure to yield, posing a serious risk to the safety of all roadway users. Additionally, the city's dense neighborhoods and mixed-use areas result in increased pedestrian and bicycle activity, further compounding the risks of severe or fatal crashes. During 2024, the City of Santa Ana experienced 14 fatal traffic crashes involving pedestrians or bicycles.

Data indicates that the city experiences a disproportionate number of crashes in specific high-traffic corridors and intersections. Vulnerable populations, including children, seniors, and economically disadvantaged residents, are particularly at risk due to limited access to safe infrastructure and transportation alternatives. Despite ongoing efforts, enforcement resources remain strained, limiting the Santa Ana Police Department’s ability to proactively address traffic safety concerns. In 2023, the city saw a decrease in the number of fatal traffic crashes; however, in 2024 the city experienced a record high of 31 fatal traffic crashes. A large portion of these crashes were pedestrians in the roadway, both at fault and not.

There has been a large increase of pedestrian traffic within our city limits and many times the pedestrians are not using marked or unmarked crosswalks. The city has many large streets with multiple lanes and large gaps between intersections. This causes pedestrians to cross traffic in a dangerous manner and crashes occur.

Santa Ana faces unique challenges related to traffic safety, with high volumes of vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian activity. The city's central location and major thoroughfares, including Interstate 5 and State Routes 22 and 55, contribute to significant commuter traffic. As a result, traffic safety remains a priority for the Santa Ana Police Department, which is committed to reducing crashes and enhancing the safety of all roadway users through proactive enforcement, education, and community engagement.

Santa Ana continues to face dangerously high rates of traffic-related injuries and fatalities among bicyclists and pedestrians. According to the Office of Traffic Safety 2022 rankings, Santa Ana placed 6th out of 15 large cities for both bicyclist injuries and fatalities, with particularly concerning numbers among children and older adults. In addition, the City’s own Vision Zero Plan identifies Santa Ana as the 3rd highest among the 13 most populous California cities for bicyclist crashes and the 5th highest for pedestrian crashes. These ranking highlight a critical safety issue for vulnerable road users and underscore the urgent need for preventative measures. We currently have 100 helmets available and will properly fit and distribute them at local schools and community events. Providing helmets and properly fitting and distributing them is a direct City Council 1 –  11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 5 of 24
and effective way to reduce the severity of injuries in crashes and promote safer riding practices throughout the community. Research consistently shows that helmets, when properly fitted, helmets are proven to significantly reduce the severity of head injuries in bicycle crashes. It is our goal to ensure that individuals receive appropriately sized helmets and be fitted correctly in order to maximizes safety impact.

Also, the top three primary crash factors are improper turning, unsafe speed, right of way. Improper movement resulted in 2 fatal crashes with 2 victims killed and causing an additional 227 crashes with 227.

Unsafe speeding caused one fatal crash with one victim killed, as well as causing 357 crashes resulting in 357 victims injured. Right of way caused 308 crashes, with 309 victims injured. These factors highlight the urgent need for targeted strategies to reduce crashes and improve roadway safety for all in our community.

Define the target population the grant intends to serve and how they are affected by the problem(s).

Santa Ana Police department will be implementing evidence-based traffic safety measures to significantly reduce the number of crashes at identified hotspots. This includes high visibility enforcement activities such as DUI Saturation, DUI/DL Checkpoints, among others.

We will implement strategies to identify and address the issue of unlicensed drivers through education and enforcement; thereby reducing the risk of crashes caused by individuals without valid driving credentials.

We will focus on pedestrian traffic incidents by implementing awareness campaigns and safety equipment distribution to ensure the safety of pedestrians and cyclists on city streets.

We will establish community outreach programs to educate residents and commuters about the importance of traffic safety and garnering their support for sustainable, long-term changes.

By addressing these key issues, Santa Ana Police Department seeks to create a safer and more efficient transportation environment in the City of Santa Ana, accommodating the daily influx of workers, addressing the challenge of unlicensed drivers, and improving the quality of life for its residents and providing services to the at-risk traffic parties within the City of Santa Ana. This includes all pedestrians, bicyclists, drivers, seniors, children, etc. The City of Santa Ana is densely populated and has a large pedestrian traffic presence and children walk to school every day in the neighborhoods. Our goal is to keep everyone on our roadways safe.

2. PERFORMANCE MEASURES
A. Goals:

1. Reduce the number of persons killed in traffic crashes.

2. Reduce the number of persons injured in traffic crashes.

3. Reduce the number of pedestrians killed in traffic crashes.

4. Reduce the number of pedestrians injured in traffic crashes.

5. Reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic crashes.

6. Reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic crashes.

7. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol-involved crashes.

8. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol-involved crashes.

9. Reduce the number of persons killed in drug-involved crashes.

10. Reduce the number of persons injured in drug-involved crashes.

11. Reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

12. Reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol/drug combo-involved crashes.

13. Reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic crashes.

14. Reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic crashes.

15. Reduce hit & run fatal crashes.

16. Reduce hit & run injury crashes.

17. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) fatal crashes.

18. Reduce nighttime (2100 - 0259 hours) injury crashes.

B. Objectives: Target Number

1. Issue a news release announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31st. The kick-off news releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials must be 1 City Council 14 – 7 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 6 of 24
emailed to the OTS Public Information Officer at [email protected], and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 7 days prior to the issuance date of the release.

2. Distribute and properly fit OTS funded bicycle helmets at no cost to community members in need who receive bicycle helmet safety education. 100

3. Purchase bicycle helmets. 100

4. Participate and report data (as required) in the following campaigns; Quarter 1:

National Pedestrian Safety Month, National Walk to School Day, National Teen Driver Safety Week, NHTSA Winter Mobilization; Quarter 3: National Distracted Driving Awareness Month, National Motorcycle Safety Month, National Bicycle Safety Month, National Click it or Ticket Mobilization; Quarter 4: National Speed Prevention Campaigns, NHTSA Summer Mobilization, National Child Passenger Safety Week, and California's Pedestrian Safety Month.
12 5. Develop (by December 31) and/or maintain a “DUI BOLO” program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the lookout for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. Updated DUI BOLOs should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly. 12 6. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST) (minimum 16 hours) POST-certified training. 2 7. Send law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement (ARIDE) 16 hour POST-certified training. 1 8. Send law enforcement personnel to the Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training (classroom and field training must be completed).
1 9. Send law enforcement personnel to the DRE Recertification training. 1

10. Send law enforcement personnel to SFST Instructor training. 1

11. Send law enforcement personnel to DRE Instructor training. 1

12. Conduct DUI/DL Checkpoints. A minimum of 1 checkpoint should be conducted during the NHTSA Winter Mobilization and 1 during the Summer Mobilization. To enhance the overall deterrent effect and promote high visibility, it is recommended the grantee issue an advance press release and conduct social media activity for each checkpoint. For combination DUI/DL checkpoints, departments should issue press releases that mention DL's will be checked at the DUI/DL checkpoint. Signs for DUI/DL checkpoints should read "DUI/Driver's License Checkpoint Ahead." OTS does not fund or support independent DL checkpoints. Only on an exception basis and with OTS pre-approval will OTS fund checkpoints that begin prior to 1800 hours. When possible, DUI/DL Checkpoint screeners should be DRE- or ARIDE-trained.
12 13. Conduct DUI Saturation Patrol operation(s). 55

14. Conduct Warrant Service operation(s) targeting multiple DUI offenders who fail to appear in court.
4 15. Conduct Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary crash factor violations.
31 16. Conduct highly publicized Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones and texting.
15 17. Conduct highly publicized Motorcycle Safety enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of motorcycle incidents or crashes resulting from unsafe speed, DUI, following too closely, unsafe lane changes, improper turning, and other primary crash factor violations by motorcyclists and other drivers. 2 18. Conduct highly publicized pedestrian and/or bicycle enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with a high number of pedestrian and/or bicycle crashes resulting from violations made by pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. 7 19. Conduct Traffic Safety educational presentation(s) with an effort to reach community members. Note: Presentation(s) may include topics such as distracted driving, DUI, speed, bicycle and pedestrian safety, seat belts and child passenger safety.
7 20. Conduct Know Your Limit campaigns with an effort to reach members of the community.
4 City Council 1 –  11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 7 of 24

21. Participate in highly visible collaborative DUI Enforcement operations. 4

22. Participate in highly visible collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations. 4

23. Conduct specialized enforcement operations focusing specifically on street racing and sideshow activities.
4 24. Participate in community collaboration and engagement activities to engage in conversations regarding traffic safety to both share information and receive input from the community members.
5 25. Send law enforcement personnel to a POST certified implicit bias training, such as; Implicit Bias and Community Policing, Principles Policing, or Beyond Bias. 10 3. METHOD OF PROCEDURE
A. Phase 1 – Program Preparation (1st Quarter of Grant Year)  The department will develop operational plans to implement the “best practice” strategies outlined in the objectives section.
 Conduct all training needed to implement the program, in the first quarter.  Purchase all grant related supplies and materials to implement the program, in the first quarter.  Items with a unit cost of $5,000 more (including tax and shipping) must comply with Buy America.  In order to develop/maintain the “DUI BOLOs,” research will be conducted to identify the “worst of the worst” repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The DUI BOLO may include the driver’s name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status, and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. DUI BOLOs should be updated and distributed to traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.  Implementation of the STEP grant activities will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high crash locations.

Media Requirements
Issue a news release approved by the OTS PIO announcing the kick-off of the grant by December 31 and after the grant is signed and executed, but no sooner than October 1, the start of the grant year. The kick-off release must be approved by the OTS PIO. If you are unable to meet the December 31 deadline to issue a kick-off press release, communicate reasons to your OTS grant coordinator and OTS PIO.

B. Phase 2 – Program Operations (Throughout Grant Year) Media Requirements
The following requirements are for all grant-related activities:
 Send all media advisories, alerts, videos, graphics, artwork, posters, radio/PSA/video scripts, storyboards, digital and/or print educational materials for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Optimum lead time would be 7 days before the scheduled release but at least 3 business days prior to the scheduled release date for review and approval is appreciated.
 Send all PowerPoint presentations, online presentations and trainings for grant-related activities to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator. Certified training courses are EXEMPT from the approval process.
 The OTS PIO is responsible for the approval of the design and content of materials. The agency understands OTS PIO approval is not authorizing approval of budget expenditure or cost. Any cost approvals must come from the OTS grant coordinator.  Pre-approval is not required when using any OTS-supplied template for media advisories, news releases, social media graphics, videos or posts, or any other OTS-supplied educational material.

However, copy the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator when any material is distributed to the media and public, such as a news release, educational material, or link to social media post.
 If an OTS-supplied template, educational material, social media graphic, post or video is substantially changed, the changes shall be sent to the OTS PIO at [email protected] for approval and copy your OTS grant coordinator.
 News releases, social media posts and alerts on platforms such as NextDoor and Nixle reporting immediate and time-sensitive grant activities (e.g. enforcement operations, day of event highlights or announcements, event invites) are EXEMPT from the OTS PIO approval process.

The OTS PIO and your OTS grant coordinator should still be notified when the grant-related City Council 1 –
11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 8 of 24
activity is happening (e.g. car seat checks, bicycle rodeos, community presentations, DUI checkpoints, etc.).
 Enforcement activities such as warrant and probation sweeps, court stings, etc. that are embargoed or could impact operations by publicizing in advance are EXEMPT from the PIO approval process. However, announcements and results of activities should still be copied to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and your OTS grant coordinator with the embargoed date and time or with “INTERNAL ONLY: DO NOT RELEASE” message in subject line of email.  Any earned or paid media campaigns for TV, radio, digital or social media that are part of a specific grant objective, using OTS grant funds, or designed and developed using contractual services by a subgrantee, requires prior approval.
 Social media posts highlighting state or national traffic safety campaigns (Distracted Driving Month, Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month, etc.), enforcement operations (DUI checkpoints, etc.), or any other grant-related activity such as Bicycle rodeos, presentations, or events, are highly encouraged but do not require prior approval.
 Submit a draft or rough-cut of all digital, printed, recorded or video material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer graphics, digital graphics, social posts connected to an earned or paid media campaign grant objective) to the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator for approval prior to the production or duplication.  Use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials, space permitting:

Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.  Space permitting, include the OTS logo on all grant-funded print materials, graphics and paid or earned social media campaign grant objective; consult the OTS PIO and copy your OTS grant coordinator for specifics, format-appropriate logos, or if space does not permit the use of the OTS logo.
 Email the OTS PIO at [email protected] and copy your OTS grant coordinator at least 21 days in advance, or when first confirmed, a short description of any significant grant-related traffic safety event or program, particularly events that are highly publicized beforehand with anticipated media coverage so OTS has sufficient notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.

If unable to attend, email the OTS PIO and coordinator brief highlights and/or results, including any media coverage (broadcast, digital, print) of event within 7 days following significant grantrelated event or program. Media and program highlights are to be reflected in QPRs.  Any news releases, work plans, scripts, storyboards, artwork, graphics, videos or any educational or informational materials that received OTS PIO approval in a prior grant year needs to be resubmitted for approval in the current grant year.
 For additional guidance, refer to the OTS Grants Materials Approval Process Guidelines and OTS Grants Media Approval Process FAQs on the OTS website.  Contact the OTS PIO or your OTS grant coordinator for consultation when changes from any of the above requirements might be warranted.

C. Phase 3 – Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Year)

1. Prepare and submit grant claim invoices (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)

2. Prepare and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPR) (due January 30, April 30, July 30, and October 30)
 Collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of goals and objectives.  Provide a brief list of activity conducted, procurement of grant-funded items, and significant media activities. Include status of grant-funded personnel, status of contracts, challenges, or special accomplishments.
 Provide a brief summary of quarterly accomplishments and explanations for objectives not completed or plans for upcoming activities.
 Collect, analyze and report statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives.

4. METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will complete the “Final Evaluation” section in the fourth/final Quarterly Performance Report (QPR). The Final Evaluation should provide a brief summary of the grant’s accomplishments, challenges and significant activities. This narrative should also include whether goals and objectives were met, exceeded, or an explanation of why objectives were not completed.

City Council 1 – 10 11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 9 of 24

5. ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full administrative support, and every effort will be made to continue the grant activities after grant conclusion.

City Council 14 – 11 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 10 of 24
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B

GRANT NUMBER
PT26193

FUND NUMBER CATALOG

NUMBER (CFDA)

FUND DESCRIPTION TOTAL AMOUNT
1906-26 20.611 Racial Profiling Prohibition Grants $5,000.00 405e DDA-26 20.616 Distracted Driving Awareness $42,000.00 402PT-26 20.600 State and Community Highway
Safety
$125,000.00
164AL-26 20.608 Minimum Penalties for Repeat
Offenders for Driving While
Intoxicated
$530,000.00

COST CATEGORY FUND
NUMBER

UNIT COST OR
RATE

UNITS TOTAL COST TO
GRANT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
Straight Time
$0.00
Overtime
DUI/DL Checkpoints 164AL-26 $14,000.00 12 $168,000.00
DUI Saturation Patrols 164AL-26 $6,010.00 55 $330,550.00 Warrant Service Operations 164AL-26 $2,200.00 4 $8,800.00 Know Your Limit 164AL-26 $2,200.00 4 $8,800.00
Collaborative DUI Enforcement 164AL-26 $2,200.00 4 $8,800.00 Traffic Enforcement 402PT-26 $2,200.00 31 $68,200.00
Motorcycle Safety Enforcement 402PT-26 $2,200.00 2 $4,400.00 Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement 402PT-26 $2,200.00 7 $15,400.00 Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement
Operations
402PT-26 $3,000.00 4 $12,000.00
Collaborative Traffic Enforcement 402PT-26 $2,200.00 4 $8,800.00 Traffic Safety Educational Presentations 402PT-26 $1,000.00 7 $7,000.00 Distracted Driving Enforcement 405e DDA26$2,800.00 15 $42,000.00 Community Collaboration Engagement 1906-26 $1,000.00 5 $5,000.00 Category Sub-Total $687,750.00
B. TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel 402PT-26 $5,200.00 1 $5,200.00
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $5,200.00
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
D. EQUIPMENT
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies 164AL-26 $5,050.00 1 $5,050.00
Bicycle Helmets 402PT-26 $20.00 100 $2,000.00
Collaborative Meetings 402PT-26 $500.00 4 $2,000.00
Category Sub-Total $9,050.00
F. INDIRECT COSTS
City Council 14 – 12 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 11 of 24
$0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $702,000.00
City Council 14 – 13 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 12 of 24
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Schedule B-1

GRANT NUMBER
PT26193

BUDGET NARRATIVE

PERSONNEL COSTS
DUI/DL Checkpoints - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

DUI Saturation Patrols - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Warrant Service Operations - Overtime for grant funded Warrant Service Operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Know Your Limit - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety presentations or campaigns conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative DUI Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative DUI Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Motorcycle Safety Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Street Racing and Sideshow Enforcement Operations - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Collaborative Traffic Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded Collaborative Traffic Enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel
Traffic Safety Educational Presentations - Overtime for grant funded traffic safety educational presentations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Distracted Driving Enforcement - Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations conducted by appropriate department personnel.

Community Collaboration Engagement - Overtime for grant funded community collaborative engagement conducted by appropriate department personnel.

TRAVEL EXPENSES
In State Travel - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included. Anticipated travel may include the OTS Traffic Safety Law Enforcement Forum. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Budget Narrative must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant funds

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
-

EQUIPMENT
-

OTHER DIRECT COSTS
DUI Checkpoint Supplies - On-scene supplies needed to conduct sobriety checkpoints. Costs may include 28" traffic cones, MUTCD compliant traffic signs, MUTCD compliant high visibility vests (maximum of 10), traffic counters (maximum of 2), generator, gas for generators, lighting, reflective banners, electronic flares, PAS Device Supplies, PAS Calibration Supplies, heater, propane for heaters, fan, anti-fatigue mats, and canopies. Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS. The cost of food and beverages will not be reimbursed.

Bicycle Helmets - Helmets to be distributed at no cost during bicycle rodeos and other bicycle safety related events. Cost per helmet not to exceed a Unit Cost of $20, including shipping, handling, and tax. More expensive helmets may be purchased if approved by OTS.

City Council 14 – 14 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 13 of 24
Collaborative Meetings - Costs for law enforcement agencies to discuss traffic safety trends and plan collaborative operations. Costs may include food and beverages for attendees; additional costs may be included if approved by OTS. Adequate records including an agenda must be maintained.

INDIRECT COSTS
-

STATEMENTS/DISCLAIMERS
There will be no program income generated from this grant.

Nothing in this “agreement” shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a particular law enforcement officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the goals and objectives here under.

City Council 1 – 1 11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 14 of 24
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety

GRANT AGREEMENT
Exhibit A

GRANT NUMBER
PT26193
Appendix A to Part 1300—Certifications and Assurances for Highway Safety Grants (23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 or Section 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Section 25024, Public Law 117- 58)
The officials named on the grant agreement, certify by way of signature on the grant agreement signature page, that the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines, policies, and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding.

Applicable provisions include, but are not limited to, the following:

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
The State will comply with applicable statutes and regulations, including but not limited to:
 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4—Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended;  Sec. 1906, Public Law 109-59, as amended by Sec. 25024, Public Law 117-58;  23 CFR part 1300—Uniform Procedures for State Highway Safety Grant Programs;  2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;
 2 CFR part 1201—Department of Transportation, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.

NONDISCRIMINATION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State highway safety agency [and its subrecipients] will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination (“Federal Nondiscrimination Authorities”). These include but are not limited to:
 Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin);
 49 CFR part 21 (entitled Non-discrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation—Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);  28 CFR 50.3 (U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964);
 The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, (42 U.S.C. 4601), (prohibits unfair treatment of persons displaced or whose property has been acquired because of Federal or Federal-aid programs and projects);
 Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973, (23 U.S.C. 324 et seq.), and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) (prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex);
 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 794 et seq.), as amended, (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability) and 49 CFR part 27;  The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), (prohibits discrimination on the basis of age);
 The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, (Pub. L. 100-209), (broadens scope, coverage, and applicability of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, The Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activities” to include all of the programs or activities of the
Federal aid recipients, subrecipients and contractors, whether such programs or activities are Federallyfunded or not);  Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12131-12189) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in the operation of public entities, public and private transportation systems, places of public accommodation, and certain testing) and 49 CFR parts 37 and 38
City Council 1 – 1 11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 15 of 24
The preceding statutory and regulatory cites hereinafter are referred to as the “Acts” and “Regulations,” respectively.

GENERAL ASSURANCES
In accordance with the Acts, the Regulations, and other pertinent directives, circulars, policy, memoranda, and/or guidance, the Recipient hereby gives assurance that it will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that:
“No person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity, for which the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance from DOT, including NHTSA.”
The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 clarified the original intent of Congress, with respect to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other non-discrimination requirements (the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973), by restoring the broad, institutional-wide scope and coverage of these nondiscrimination statutes and requirements to include all programs and activities of the Recipient, so long as any portion of the program is Federally assisted.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
More specifically, and without limiting the above general Assurance, the Recipient agrees with and gives the following Assurances with respect to its Federally assisted Highway Safety Grant Program:

1. The Recipient agrees that each “activity,” “facility,” or “program,” as defined in 49 CFR part 21 will be (with regard to an “activity”) facilitated, or will be (with regard to a “facility”) operated, or will be (with regard to a “program”) conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by, or pursuant to the Acts and the Regulations.

2. The Recipient will insert the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material subject to the Acts and the Regulations made in connection with all Highway Safety Grant Programs and, in adapted form, in all proposals for negotiated agreements regardless of funding source:
“The [name of Recipient], in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award.”

3. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix A and E of this Assurance (also referred to as DOT order 1050.2A) [1]in every contract or agreement subject to the Acts and the Regulations.

4. The Recipient will insert the clauses of appendix B of DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a Recipient.

5. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance to construct a facility, or part of a facility, the Assurance will extend to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.

6. That where the Recipient receives Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the Assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property.

7. That the Recipient will include the clauses set forth in appendix C and appendix D of this DOT Order 1050.2A, as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, licenses, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the Recipient with other parties:
a. for the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. for the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program.

8. That this Assurance obligates the Recipient for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the City Council 1 – 1 11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 16 of 24
form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the Assurance obligates the Recipient, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:
a. the period during which the property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or
b. the period during which the Recipient retains ownership or possession of the property.

9. The Recipient will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary of Transportation or the official to whom he/she delegates specific authority to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub- grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

10. The Recipient agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the Acts, the Regulations, and this Assurance.

By signing this ASSURANCE, the State highway safety agency also agrees to comply (and require any subrecipients, sub-grantees, contractors, successors, transferees, and/or assignees to comply) with all applicable provisions governing NHTSA's access to records, accounts, documents, information, facilities, and staff. You also recognize that you must comply with any program or compliance reviews, and/or complaint investigations conducted by NHTSA. You must keep records, reports, and submit the material for review upon request to NHTSA, or its designee in a timely, complete, and accurate way. Additionally, you must comply with all other reporting, data collection, and evaluation requirements, as prescribed by law or detailed in program guidance.

The State highway safety agency gives this ASSURANCE in consideration of and for obtaining any Federal grants, loans, contracts, agreements, property, and/or discounts, or other Federal-aid and Federal financial assistance extended after the date hereof to the recipients by the U.S. Department of Transportation under the Highway Safety Grant Program. This ASSURANCE is binding on the State highway safety agency, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors and their subcontractors', transferees, successors in interest, and any other participants in the Highway Safety Grant Program. The person(s) signing below is/are authorized to sign this ASSURANCE on behalf of the Recipient.

THE DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE ACT OF 1988 (41 U.S.C. 8103)
The Subgrantee will provide a drug-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace, and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; b. Establishing a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about:

1. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;

2. The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;

3. Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;

4. The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug violations occurring in the workplace;

5. Making it a requirement that each employee engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); c. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will—

1. Abide by the terms of the statement;

2. Notify the employer of any criminal drug statute conviction for a violation occurring in the workplace no later than five days after such conviction; d. Notifying the agency within ten days after receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction; e. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 days of receiving notice under subparagraph (c)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted—

1. Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination;

2. Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or City Council 1 – 1 11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 17 of 24
rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
f. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of all of the paragraphs above.

POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508), which limits the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS, AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement;

2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instructions;

3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub-awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.

RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRIMARY TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION (STATES) City Council 1 – 1
11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 18 of 24

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered transaction. The prospective primary tier participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary tier participant to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this transaction.

3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the department or agency determined to enter into this transaction. If it is later determined that the prospective primary tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default or may pursue suspension or debarment.

4. The prospective primary tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective primary tier participant learns its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

5. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the department or agency to which this proposal is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

6. The prospective primary tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering into this transaction.

7. The prospective primary tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart

9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website
( https://www.sam.gov/).

9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate the transaction for cause or default.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS—PRIMARY TIER

COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective primary tier participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and City Council 1 – 20 11//202
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 19 of 24
its principals:
a. Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency;
b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; c. Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and d. Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

2. Where the prospective primary tier participant is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR LOWER TIER PARTICIPANT CERTIFICATION

1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification set out below and agrees to comply with the requirements of 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.

4. The terms covered transaction, civil judgment, debarment, suspension, ineligible, participant, person, principal, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, are defined in 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.

5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.

6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that it will include the clause titled “Instructions for Lower Tier Participant Certification” including the “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transaction,” without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions and will require lower tier participants to comply with 2 CFR parts 180 and 1200.

7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart

9.4, debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant is responsible for ensuring that its principals are not suspended, debarred, or otherwise ineligible to participate in covered transactions. To verify the eligibility of its principals, as well as the eligibility of any prospective lower tier participants, each participant may, but is not required to, check the System for Award Management Exclusions website
( https://www.sam.gov/).

8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of City Council 1 – 21 11//202 9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 20 of 24
records in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business dealings.

9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension or debarment.

CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION—LOWER TIER

COVERED TRANSACTIONS

1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this proposal.

BUY AMERICA
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will comply with the Buy America requirement (23 U.S.C. 313) when purchasing items using Federal funds. Buy America requires a State, or subrecipient, to purchase with Federal funds only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States, unless the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestically produced items would be inconsistent with the public interest, that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. In order to use Federal funds to purchase foreign produced items, the State must submit a waiver request that provides an adequate basis and justification for approval by the Secretary of Transportation.

CERTIFICATION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST
(applies to subrecipients as well as States)

GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
No employee, officer, or agent of a State or its subrecipient who is authorized in an official capacity to negotiate, make, accept, or approve, or to take part in negotiating, making, accepting, or approving any subaward, including contracts or subcontracts, in connection with this grant shall have, directly or indirectly, any financial or personal interest in any such subaward. Such a financial or personal interest would arise when the employee, officer, or agent, any member of his or her immediate family, his or her partner, or an organization which employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or personal interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a subaward. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall maintain a written code or standards of conduct that provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards by officers, employees, or agents. a. The code or standards shall provide that the recipient's officers, employees, or agents may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from present or potential subawardees, including contractors or parties to subcontracts. b. The code or standards shall establish penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions for violations, as permitted by State or local law or regulations.

2. The recipient shall maintain responsibility to enforce the requirements of the written code or standards of conduct.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
City Council 14 – 22 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 21 of 24
No State or its subrecipient, including its officers, employees, or agents, shall perform or continue to perform under a grant or cooperative agreement, whose objectivity may be impaired because of any related past, present, or currently planned interest, financial or otherwise, in organizations regulated by NHTSA or in organizations whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities. Based on this policy:

1. The recipient shall disclose any conflict of interest identified as soon as reasonably possible, making an immediate and full disclosure in writing to NHTSA. The disclosure shall include a description of the action which the recipient has taken or proposes to take to avoid or mitigate such conflict.

2. NHTSA will review the disclosure and may require additional relevant information from the recipient.

If a conflict of interest is found to exist, NHTSA may (a) terminate the award, or (b) determine that it is otherwise in the best interest of NHTSA to continue the award and include appropriate provisions to mitigate or avoid such conflict.

3. Conflicts of interest that require disclosure include all past, present, or currently planned organizational, financial, contractual, or other interest(s) with an organization regulated by NHTSA or with an organization whose interests may be substantially affected by NHTSA activities, and which are related to this award. The interest(s) that require disclosure include those of any recipient, affiliate, proposed consultant, proposed subcontractor, and key personnel of any of the above. Past interest shall be limited to within one year of the date of award. Key personnel shall include any person owning more than a 20 percent interest in a recipient, and the officers, employees or agents of a recipient who are responsible for making a decision or taking an action under an award where the decision or action can have an economic or other impact on the interests of a regulated or affected organization.

PROHIBITION ON USING GRANT FUNDS TO CHECK FOR HELMET USAGE (applies to subrecipients as well as States)
The State and each subrecipient will not use 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 grant funds for programs to check helmet usage or to create checkpoints that specifically target motorcyclists.

POLICY ON SEAT BELT USE
In accordance with Executive Order 13043, Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States, dated April 16, 1997, the Grantee is encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt use policies and programs for its employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally-owned vehicles. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is responsible for providing leadership and guidance in support of this Presidential initiative. For information and resources on traffic safety programs and policies for employers, please contact the Network of Employers for Traffic Safety (NETS), a public-private partnership dedicated to improving the traffic safety practices of employers and employees. You can download information on seat belt programs, costs of motor vehicle crashes to employers, and other traffic safety initiatives at www.trafficsafety.org. The NHTSA website ( www.nhtsa.gov) also provides information on statistics, campaigns, and program evaluations and references.

POLICY ON BANNING TEXT MESSAGING WHILE DRIVING
In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership On Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, States are encouraged to adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted driving, including policies to ban text messaging while driving company-owned or rented vehicles, Government-owned, leased or rented vehicles, or privately-owned vehicles when on official Government business or when performing any work on or behalf of the Government. States are also encouraged to conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as establishment of new rules and programs or reevaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving, and education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.

City Council 14 – 23 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 22 of 24

INSTRUCTIONS FOR ADDING OR UPDATING GEMS USERS

1. Each agency is allowed a total of FIVE (5) GEMS Users.

2. GEMS Users listed on this form will be authorized to login to GEMS to complete and submit Quarterly Performance Reports (QPRs) and reimbursement claims.

3. Complete the form if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s).

4. The Grant Director must sign this form and return it with the Grant Agreement.

CURRENT GEMS USER(S)

1. Sarah Ro
Title: Accounting Manager Media Contact: No
Phone: (714) 647-5437
Email: [email protected]

2. Alexander Trinidad
Title: Director of Finance and Management Svcs (MM) Media Contact: No Phone: (714) 647-5295
Email: [email protected]

3. Kelvin Catlin
Title: Detective - CIU Media Contact: No
Phone: (714) 245-8200
Email: [email protected]

4. Ricardo Diaz
Title: Sergeant Media Contact: Yes
Phone: (714) 245-8210
Email: [email protected]

5. Leo Martinez
Title: Senior Management Analyst Media Contact: No
Phone: (714) 245-8405
Email: [email protected]

6. Joseph Marty
Title: Commander Media Contact: No
Phone: (714) 245-8274
Email: [email protected]

7. Tram Tran
Title: Account Clerk Media Contact: No
Phone: (714) 245-8200
State of California – Office of Traffic Safety
OTS-55 Grant Electronic Management System (GEMS) Access Exhibit C

GRANT NUMBER
PT26193

GRANT DETAILS
Grant Number: PT26193
Agency Name: Santa Ana Police Department
Grant Title: Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP) Agreement Total: $702,000.00
Authorizing Official: Alvaro Nunez
Fiscal Official: Alexander Trinidad
Grant Director: Joseph Marty
City Council 14 – 24 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 23 of 24
Email: [email protected]
City Council 14 – 25 11/4/2025
9/15/2025 7:39:02 AM Page 24 of 24
Complete the below information if adding, removing or editing a GEMS user(s) GEMS User 1
Add/Change {{[]c11_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[] c12_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c1_es_:signer1}} No{{[]c2_es_:signer1}} Name Job Title
Email address Phone number
GEMS User 2
Add/Change {{[]c13_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c14_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c3_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c4_es_:signer1}} Name Job Title
Email address Phone number
GEMS User 3
Add/Change {{[]c15_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c16_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c5_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c6_es_:signer1}} Name Job Title
Email address Phone number
GEMS User 4
Add/Change {{[]c17_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c18_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c8_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c7_es_:signer1}} Name Job Title
Email address Phone number
GEMS User 5
Add/Change {{[]c19_es_:signer1}} Remove Access {{[]c20_es_:signer1}} Add as a media contact? Yes {{[]c9_es_:signer1}}No {{[]c10_es_:signer1}} Name Job Title
Email address Phone number
Form completed by: Date:

As a signatory I hereby authorize the listed individual(s) to represent and have GEMS user access.

Signature Name
Grant Director
Date Title
Sgt. R. Diaz #2567 (Sep 16, 2025 05:53:22 PDT)
Sgt. R. Diaz #2567 Sep 16, 2025
City Council 14 – 26 11/4/2025
Police Department
www.santa-ana.org/pd
Item # 15
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
November 4, 2025
TOPIC: School Resource Officer Services for the Orange County School of the Arts

AGENDA TITLE
First Amendment to the Agreement with the Orange County School of the Arts for School Resource Officer Services

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute the first amendment to the agreement with the Orange County School of the Arts (OCSA) for School Resource Officer (SRO) services to provide OCSA the opportunity to collaborate in the interview and approval process of the assigned officer, and increase the annual contingency amount by $50,000 for Year 2 and 3 totaling $100,000, for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $906,127, during the term of the agreement (Agreement No. A-2025-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
On April 20, 2021, the City Council approved a three-year agreement with Orange County School of the Arts (OCSA) for the Santa Ana Police Department (SAPD) to provide school resource officer services from April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2024.

OCSA, a public charter school located in the heart of Santa Ana, provides a six-year comprehensive academic and conservatory arts program to approximately 2,300 students, from over 100 cities throughout Southern California, covering grades 7 through 12. The Santa Ana Unified School District Police Department does not provide a School Resource Officer (SRO) on this campus, as this site is a charter school.

OCSA requested to continue this relationship to enhance the safety of its students and faculty. The City Council approved another three-year agreement for this purpose on February 20, 2024 and the SAPD is currently in the middle of the second year of this agreement. OCSA is requesting two minor clarifications to the agreement:
• A collaborative process for officer assignment that allows OCSA to provide input, while SAPD retains final authority;
City Council 15 – 1 11/4/2025
School Resource Officer Services for the Orange County School of the Arts November 4, 2025

Page 2 ends

• Language ensuring OCSA will not be billed the daily rate if the City cannot provide a substitute officer.

Additionally, OCSA would like the option to request scheduled overtime for SRO coverage every Friday during the school year. The current annual contingency amount of $25,000 may not be sufficient to include the extra hours, in addition to coverage for various school events throughout the year. Increasing the contingency amount for Year 2 and 3 of the agreement from $25,000 to $75,000 per year will provide OCSA the flexibility for additional coverage, such as special events and enhanced staffing, and also allow the City to be reimbursed for the extra labor costs.

These revisions strengthen transparency and reinforce the partnership between the City and OCSA without altering the scope of services. Staff recommends approval of the amendment.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Reimbursement from OCSA will continue to be deposited in the Police Miscellaneous Reimbursement Revenue Account (No. 01114002-57402).

EXHIBIT(S)

1. First Amendment to Agreement with the Orange County School of the Arts Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Police Chief
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 15 – 2 11/4/2025
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 15 – 3 11/4/2025
City Council 15 – 4 11/4/2025
City Council 15 – 5 11/4/2025
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 16
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
November 4, 2025
TOPIC: Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan Update

AGENDA TITLE
Agreement with KTU&A, LLC dba KTUA to Conduct the Vision Zero Plan Update (Project No. 24-6904) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with KTU&A, LLC dba KTUA to provide traffic engineering and transportation planning services for the Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan Update in an amount not-to-exceed $180,832, for the term beginning November 4, 2025 and expiring November 3, 2026, with provisions for one, one-year extension (Agreement No. A-2025-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency Engineering Services Division (PWA) is responsible for the administration and oversight of all capital improvement projects in the City including the planning, design, and management of its active transportation network. The Santa Ana Vision Zero Action Plan (Plan), adopted by City Council on June 4, 2024, is an initiative to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries in Santa Ana by 2040. Adoption of the plan was also a pre-requisite to apply for federal transportation grants, such as the Safe Streets for All program for Euclid Street improvements. When the Plan was adopted, City Council identified the need to amend the Plan by evaluating and incorporating additional corridors such as MacArthur Boulevard and Alton Avenue. Staff has performed preliminary evaluations and community outreach and recommends incorporating the following five additional priority corridors/street segments (1-2 miles long) into the framework:
• Flower Street from Warner Avenue to MacArthur Boulevard • Edinger Avenue from Flower Street to Standard Avenue
• Segerstrom Avenue from Bear Street to Flower Street
• MacArthur Boulevard from Fairview Street to Main Street • Dyer Road from Flower Street to the City Boundary
City Council 16 – 1 11/4/2025
Santa Ana Vision Zero Update
November 4, 2025

Page 2 ends

Two new sample non-priority corridors/street segments (1-2 miles long) will also be included as part of the scope of work – Alton Avenue from Bristol Street to Bear Street and Bear Street from Segerstrom Avenue to MacArthur Boulevard. These non-priority segments will serve as examples for how Vision Zero based improvements may be incorporated into street improvement projects throughout the City. All seven new corridor/street segments were selected based on recent collision data, coupled with bicycle and pedestrian activity and are depicted in Figure 1 below.

This expansion aims to enhance traffic safety measures, reduce traffic-related fatalities and severe injuries, and promote a more pedestrian and cyclist-friendly urban environment in more areas of the City of Santa Ana.

Figure 1: Additional Priority Corridors/Segments
Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 25-026 was issued on February 18, 2025 on the City’s online bid management and publication system, PlanetBids. A summary of vendor participation and results is as follows:
829 Vendors notified
37 Santa Ana vendors notified
45 Vendors downloaded the RFP packet
1 Proposal received
0 Proposals received from Santa Ana vendors
Proposals were opened on March 4, 2025 and evaluated. Only one proposal was submitted by the RFP deadline and was determined to be responsive to the City Council 16 – 2 11/4/2025
Santa Ana Vision Zero Update
November 4, 2025

Page 3 ends

specifications and met the City’s requirements (Exhibit 1). An evaluation committee reviewed and rated the proposal in accordance with the criteria outlined in the RFP.

Staff recommends awarding an agreement to KTU&A, LLC to conduct the Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan Update (Exhibit 2). As authors of the City Council-adopted Vision Zero Plan, KTU&A, LLC will provide continuity in team members, experience, and community involvement throughout the project. KTU&A, LLC is a California company specializing in active transportation, land use and multimodal transportation planning, and sustainability. KTU&A, LLC has demonstrated a depth of experience working with similar-sized California public agencies on a variety of projects including Vision Zero Plans, Active Transportation Plans, Complete Streets Projects, Safety Action Plans, and First/Last Mile Plans.

As part of the study’s outreach efforts, staff will work closely with City Council through various meetings to ensure the recommendations align with the City’s goals and vision for citywide traffic safety.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are budgeted and available for expenditure in the following accounts for Fiscal Year 2025-26. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for approval of carryovers to Fiscal Year 2026-27.

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
2025-26
03217662-
66220
(24-6904)
Measure M
Street
Construction
Measure M2 Local
Fairshare, Improvements
Other Than Buildings
$80,000
2025-26
03217662-
66220
(24-6905)
Measure M
Street
Construction
Measure M2 Local
Fairshare, Improvements
Other Than Buildings
$50,000
2025-26
03217662-
66220
(25-6904)
Measure M
Street
Construction
Measure M2 Local
Fairshare, Improvements
Other Than Buildings
$50,832
TOTAL $180,832

EXHIBIT(S)

1. KTU&A, LLC Proposal

2. Agreement with KTU&A, LLC
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 16 – 3 11/4/2025

SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE
RFP NO. 25-026 | QUALIFICATIONS | CITY OF SANTA ANA | MARCH 4, 2025 3916 Normal Street
San Diego, CA 92103
619-294-4477
www.ktua.com
City Council 16 – 4 11/4/2025
Contents

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
COVER LETTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 SERVICES PROVIDED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 AGREEMENT STATEMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE
KTUA Profile and Project Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Subconsultant Profiles and Project Experience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Team Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 KTUA and Subconsultant Key Personnel Resumes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 PROPOSED WORK PLAN/UNDERSTANDING OF NEED . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

CERTIFICATIONS (ATTACHMENTS)
Attachment A: Proposer’s Certification and Proposal Item Pricing . . . . . . 18 Attachment B: References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Attachment C: Proposer’s Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Attachment D: Non-Collusion Affidavit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Attachment E: Non-Lobbying Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Attachment F: Non-Discrimination Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Attachment G: Subcontractor Designation Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Attachment H: CARB Fleet Compliance Certification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Attachment I: Statement Regarding CWA Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

COST PROPOSAL (SUBMITTED SEPARATELY)
A
B
C
D
E
F
2 1
City Council 16 – 5 11/4/2025
3916 Normal Street
San Diego, CA 92103
619-294-4477
www.ktua.com
March 4, 2025
Ruben Castaneda, Senior Engineer
City of Santa Ana – Public Works Agency, Traffic Engineering 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Mr. Castaneda and Members of the Selection Committee, “A safe, balanced, and integrated network of travelways for nonmotorized modes of transportation that connects people to activity centers, inspiring healthy and active lifestyles.” – Goal M-3 Santa Ana General Plan As one of the goals in the City’s General Plan, this Vision Zero Plan Update will continue to provide the necessary tools and guidance to make the nonmotorized environment safer for residents. But also, being conscious of the motorized environment as well and the safety of all roadway users. The City is no stranger to innovative and progressive transportation initiatives and implementation. Being a part of the City’s endeavors over the past decade has been a rewarding experience and we hope to continue that partnership with this Vision Zero Plan Update.

As authors of the 2024 Vision Zero Plan, KTUA will provide continuity in team members, experience, and community involvement throughout the project. We will also provide efficiency as our team conducted the initial analysis and assisted with working through Crossroads data and document development. We have all the current files, formats, and data to meet the expedited schedule.

Our team of experts will ensure you receive the highest value for the project budget and that all stated objectives in the RFP are met and exceeded. Through our previous City projects, team members played a part in helping secure over $27M in grants through inclusive engagement, innovative design, and comprehensive planning.

Mark Thomas – Design and engineering for this update will be led by Mark Thomas. They were part of the original Vision Zero team and brings experience in planning, designing, and constructing innovative active transportation facilities throughout California. They will bring their thoughtful design and agency coordination experience to the team, supporting cost estimation, consistency review, countermeasure review, and analysis.

Latino Health Access (LHA) – A long-time partner, LHA brings a comprehensive understanding of community desires and concerns and engaging the Santa Ana community. They collect purpose-driven, community-based input to empower public sector decision-makers to make informed, sensitive, and beneficial choices for their projects and programs. LHA will lead the community engagement campaign to provide an extraordinary effort in obtaining a broad cross section of involvement from the community.

We look forward to the opportunity to continue assisting the City to improve transportation access and safety throughout the City. I am the contact person authorized to represent the KTUA team, and my contact information is noted below.

Respectfully submitted,
Joe Punsalan

KTUA AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Joe Punsalan, Principal
3916 Normal Street, San Diego, CA 92103
619-294-4477 x127; Cell: 619-851-1870
[email protected]
City Council 16 – 6 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 2
B Services Provided
C Agreement Statement
Services Provided
The KTUA team will provide a comprehensive approach to
updating the Vision Zero Plan, with a focus on producing actionable products. The scope includes various outreach events and planning updates designed to encourage community involvement, supporting the data-driven analysis.

Below are the key tasks:

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT:
• Develop a community engagement plan to establish a
framework for gathering input
• Create social media and online tools to facilitate community engagement • Hold one workshop in each of the six (6) wards to gather community input
• Organize monthly project team meetings
UPDATING EXISTING CONDITIONS AND VISION ZERO RECOMMENDATIONS AND STRATEGIES:
• Analyze the latest 10 years of crash data to identify trends using GIS, and develop a high-injury network
• Update crash trend data to identify patterns contributing to fatal and high-injury crashes
• Develop actions, strategies, and countermeasures based on crash patterns and the high-injury network, focusing on infrastructure and programmatic improvements
• Identify success metrics for the proposed
recommendations
• Conduct site visits along the five (5) priority corridors PROJECT SUMMARY SHEETS AND FINAL PLAN:
• Develop concepts for five (5) priority corridors, plus two additional concepts, totaling seven (7) concepts
• Create seven (7) cross-section renderings
• Provide cost estimates for all seven (7) concepts
• Address comments from the Draft Plan and finalize the Vision Zero Plan Update
KTU&A has read EXHIBIT II – Sample Agreement of the RFP, dated February 18, 2025, and confirms the ability to execute the City’s Professional Services Agreement.

City Council 16 – 7 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 3
Founded in 1970, KTUA brings together land use planners, transportation planners, sustainability experts, landscape architects, GIS analysts, outreach facilitators, and graphic designers to focus on creating livable communities with mobility choices. KTUA has expanded the boundaries of a traditional planning and landscape architecture office by incorporating active transportation, land use and transportation planning, and resource planning practices into our portfolio. This diversity provides KTUA the ability to shape the big picture while addressing the fine-grain details that contribute to sustainable natural and built environments.

Over the past 20 years, KTUA has been at the forefront of active transportation and complete streets planning throughout southern California. Our expertise and passion in planning and designing mobility choices for all ages and abilities has steadily been growing throughout the state. We continue to develop award winning plans and designs, community engagement strategies, and technical tools to provide our clients a wide range of analysis to support and lead these projects. With our ties to healthy placemaking, we take pride in integrating space for people in our plans for not only mobility purposes but for social and economic activities. Our team is committed to inclusive planning and design, to ensure that projects serve those that need them most.

RELEVANT VISION ZERO/SAFE ROUTES EXPERIENCE
• City of Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan*
• City of Santa Ana Standard Avenue Protected Bikeway** • City of Santa Ana Active Transportation and Complete Streets Projects* • City of El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan
• City of Upland Mobility Master Plan**
• OCTA Orange County Bike Connectors (Gap Closure Feasibility Study)** • City of Montebello First Mile/Last Mile Master Plan
• Los Alamitos Active Transportation Plan*
• City of Rialto Safety Action Plan
*Project experience in collaboration with LHA
**Project experience in collaboration with Mark Thomas

LEGAL NAME
‚ KTU&A

YEAR FOUNDED
‚ 1970

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
‚ California Corporation

OFFICE LOCATIONS
‚ San Diego (Main Office)
3916 Normal Street,
San Diego, CA 92103
Phone: 619-294-4477
‚ Central Coast (Satellite Office)

PRINCIPAL AGENT/MANAGING PRINCIPAL
‚ Joe Punsalan, Principal
3916 Normal Street,
San Diego, CA 92103
Phone: 619-294-4477 ext. 127
Cell: 619-851-1870
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 29
‚ 11 Landscape Architects
‚ 8 Planners
‚ 2 Landscape Designers
‚ 2 Irrigation Designers
‚ 2 GIS Analysts
‚ 2 Marketing
‚ 2 Accounting

CERTIFICATIONS
‚ Small Business Enterprise,
California Dept. of General Services,
CA SBE 30007 exp. 01/31/27

PLANNING SERVICES
‚ Land Use | Transportation Planning
‚ Active Transportation Planning
‚ Resource Planning
‚ Federal Planning

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SERVICES
‚ Civic and Public Works
‚ Parks and Recreation
‚ Healthcare
‚ Education
‚ Housing
‚ Hospitality
‚ Office and Commercial

SUPPORT SERVICES
‚ Public Outreach
‚ GIS
‚ 3D Modeling and Simulations
‚ Sustainable Design
‚ Water Management
‚ Grant Writing
D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA Profile & Project Experience City of Santa Ana Standard Avenue Protected Bikeway
City Council 16 – 8 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 4
D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA Project Experience
CLIENT
‚ City of Santa Ana
‚ Mauricio Castaneda
‚ 714-647-5643
‚ [email protected]
STATUS ‚ Completed 2024
SERVICES ‚ GIS
‚ Collision Analysis and
Countermeasures
‚ Safe Routes to School
PROJECT FEE ‚ $179,965
KTUA FEE ‚ $120,190
KTUA KEY PERSONNEL ‚ Joe Punsalan
‚ Darren Jacobsen
Safe Mobility Santa Ana Update (Santa Ana Vision Zero)
The Santa Ana Vision Zero Update (SAVZ) builds on the original SMSA from 2016 to evaluate citywide traffic safety through a comprehensive analysis of traffic collisions. The analysis phase includes identifying contributing factors or patterns in the collision data, to locate specific hot spot locations, citywide trends, and best practices in traffic safety to identify solutions to evolve the roadway network in Santa Ana into one where roadway users can make transportation decisions and unanticipated mistakes without risk of severe injury or death. The plan utilized the FHWA-sanctioned Safe Systems approach to improve the safety across the network, using low-cost but highly effective countermeasures.

KTUA provided data collection, analysis, GIS map production, and led the safety evaluation and field reviews for street segments and intersections that present the highest risk to vulnerable roadways users (bicyclists and pedestrians). The prioritization of risk factors established included collision patterns, severity of injuries, and proximity to school, parks, and other pedestrian/bicycle generating uses. Based on the data collection, field review and collision analysis; countermeasures for proposed projects were recommended and CAD drawings were produced in AutoCAD for 20 corridors, segments, and intersections to mitigate potential future collisions and facilitate safe and comfortable trips for children’s travel to and from school.

City Council 16 – 9 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 5
D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA Project Experience
CLIENT
‚ City of Santa Ana
‚ Zed Kekula, Senior Civil Engineer
‚ 714-647-5606
‚ [email protected]
STATUS ‚ Completed 2021
SERVICES ‚ Landscape Architecture
‚ Complete Streets Planning
PROJECT FEE ‚ $31,000
KTUA KEY PERSONNEL ‚ Joe Punsalan
‚ Jacob Leon
‚ Stephen Nunez
The Santa Ana Standard Avenue Protected Bikeway
project implemented a Class 2 buffered bike lane along
Standard Avenue from Warner Avenue to Edinger Avenue, a Class 4 protected bike lane from Edinger Avenue to Chestnut Avenue, and a Class 3 bicycle boulevard from Chestnut Avenue to 3rd Street. This design also included a fully protected intersection at Standard Avenue and McFadden Avenue as well as partial protection/curb extensions at other various intersections. Signalized bicycle crossings included separate bicycle phasing and signal heads. Pedestrian improvements along the corridor include high-visibility City of Santa Ana Standard Avenue Protected Bikeway crosswalks and bulb outs at all crossings and rectangular rapid flashing beacons at unsignalized crossings.

KTUA prepared conceptual renderings to effectively convey the proposed project features at community workshops and assisted in facilitating those meetings. KTUA also assisted with landscape design, placemaking and a
landscape construction document package with specifications. Due to the experience is planning, designing, and implementing bikeways, as well as the Central Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan, KTUA provided bikeway and
pedestrian design review for the various submittals.

CLIENT
‚ City of El Monte
‚ Sarah Zadok
‚ 626-580-2217
‚ [email protected]
SERVICES ‚ Visual Simulations
‚ Collision Analysis
STATUS ‚ Completed 2023
PROJECT FEE ‚ $232,784
KTUA KEY PERSONNEL ‚ Joe Punsalan
‚ Krista Campolong
‚ Alex Samarin
City of El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan
KTUA worked with City staff and stakeholders to develop a Vision Zero Action Plan (VZAP) that defines, develops, and recommends implementation activities supporting a
Vision Zero approach to multimodal transportation systems planning, policy and programs. This project analyzed collision data, roadway configuration to mitigate transportation system fatalities and severe injuries which are preventable by providing accessibility for all. The planning process established community goals for the City of El Monte’s
transportation system, including context sensitive design(s) and traffic speeds appropriate for enhancing safety and mobility for all system users.

The VZAP accomplishes the following:
• Considers Vision Zero best practices, including policies, programs, and strategies, that are successful elsewhere and applicable to the City of El Monte
• Develops a High-Injury Network (HIN) to identify corridors for bicycle and pedestrian improvements • Coordinates with existing road safety efforts underway in the City and Vision Zero initiatives elsewhere
• Engages community stakeholders in setting the priorities for investment in Vision Zero strategies • Identifies partnership opportunities with public, private and non-profit organizations to advance Vision Zero
strategies in the City
• Refines existing and propose new metrics to track plan progress towards Vision Zero
City Council 16 – 10 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 6
D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA Project Experience
DOCUMENT: https://tinyurl.com/y7wgxv6b
AWARDS: 2019 APA OC Transportation Planning Merit Award, 2019 SCAG Sustainability Award, Active, Healthy and Safe Communities, Central Santa Ana Complete Streets | 2016 APA Orange County Transportation and Best Practices Awards, Downtown Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan | 2015 ULI Orange County Sustainability Award, Downtown Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan City of Santa Ana Active Transportation Projects
CLIENT
‚ City of Santa Ana
‚ Zed Kekula, Senior Civil Engineer
‚ 714-647-5606
‚ [email protected]
DATE OF PERFORMANCE ‚ 2015-2019 (multiple projects)
SERVICES ‚ Active Transportation Planning
‚ 3D Modeling
‚ Community Engagement
PROJECT FEES COMBINED ‚ $649,196
KTUA KEY PERSONNEL ‚ Joe Punsalan, Jacob Leon
The Downtown Complete Streets
study area focused on the connections between the Regional Transportation Center (SARTC) and Downtown.

The area included a wide range of
land uses and transportation modes.

The plan provides recommendations
for physical changes to streets, sidewalks and intersections that supports safe, active transportation along and
across the study area.

A multi-lingual public outreach component included surveys, community advisory meetings, and a neighborhood workshop - a consecutive three-day workshop with walking
and biking tours to gather input and
intimately experience the Downtown
area. Through the community engagement process, preliminary designs for five priority projects were developed,
including concepts, 3D illustrations
and costs estimates.

KTUA continued the planning effort for
Central Santa Ana Complete Streets
and created StoryMaps to keep
residents informed and to address
technical topics. The city identified
five existing corridors for the study
with the goal of adding connections
between them and adding new corridors for a complete network.

Grassroots organizations were an
integral component of the community
engagement program from Central
Santa Ana. Activities included tactical urbanism with a demonstration cycle track and parklet, walking and
biking tours, and a bus-walk tour
combination, allowing participants to
experience the City streets and transit
firsthand and to provide insight on
improvements that improve safety and
enhance their quality of life.

The eleven recommended corridors
were selected based on public input,
as well as in-depth analysis of land
use and activity centers; existing
and proposed bike and pedestrian
facilities; street classifications; average
daily trips; transit routes; and bike and
pedestrian collisions.

The recommended projects from
the two Complete Streets plans
served as the basis for grant funding
applications. As a result, the city has
obtained more than $20M in grants
to prepare engineering and implementation plans.

The goal of the Santa Ana Active
Transportation Plan was to create a
walkable, bikeable, livable and vibrant
city. The city has a good framework
to support active transportation,
including a strong grid network; a
mixture of land use; an extensive
sidewalk network and urban forest
that increases comfort and establishes a sense of place; a community and business supported arts program; a demographic that
would benefit from a connected
multi-modal network; high transit
use; and close proximity to the
Santa Ana River. The city faced
challenges to the implementation
of a complete multi-modal network,
including: high speed/high volume/
wide arterials with narrow sidewalks and few pedestrian crossings; transit stops that lack shade and amenities; inadequate bicycle
facilities; and generational changes between established business owners and a new era of retailers.

The objectives of the plan were
to: improve multi-modal safety and
accessibility for all users; foster
livable and healthy communities
and promote social equity; provide
balance for a complete multi-modal system; and create grant ready project fact sheets to enable the
city to obtain design and implementation funding.

City Council 16 – 11 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 7
D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA Project Experience
City of Upland Mobility Master Plan
KTUA conducted a policy review and data analysis to
understand existing conditions; spearheaded a comprehensive, year-long community engagement process to understand community needs; and developed project
recommendations to improve safe and efficient active
transportation and public transit options for Upland.

The relative quality and quantity of mobility infrastructure of the City is well-served by an aging but nominally sufficient pedestrian network, whereas safety and comfort in accessing regional non-vehicular mobility options such as light rail, bus, and multipurpose paths is deficient.

This is especially true for the disadvantaged communities within the wealthier 80,000-person City of Upland, though public outreach efforts were challenged to reach this population. In-person and online outreach methods
were employed through multiple channels, with metrics
for tracking success in reaching these areas slowly and surely improving. Walk audits in these neighborhoods
were key outreach endeavors for understanding issues
and distributing more information about surveys and additional opportunities for input.

CLIENT
‚ City of Upland
‚ Alan French, Principal Engineer
Upland Public Works Land
Development & Transportation
Division
‚ 909-931-4235
‚ [email protected]
SERVICES ‚ Active Transportation Planning
‚ Community Engagement
STATUS ‚ Ongoing 2025
PROJECT FEE ‚ $269,862
KTUA FEE ‚ $155,170
KTUA KEY PERSONNEL ‚ Joe Punsalan
‚ Alex Samarin
‚ Marina Varano
‚ Madeline Pysher
‚ Isabel Perez
City Council 16 – 12 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 8
D Firm Team & Experience | Subconsultant Profiles & Project Experience

LATINO HEALTH ACCESS
Latino Health Access (LHA), was founded in
1993. Our mission has two priorities: 1) delivering culturally appropriate health-related services and programming to address urgent
health concerns; and 2) engaging individuals
in low-income, low opportunity areas in transforming their environment and creating positive, concrete changes in their homes and communities by providing
tools, training, and mechanisms for civic participation. We firmly believe that achieving our vision of a healthy, equitable, inclusive and prosperous community requires that community residents should be involved in every decision and every step of the process to create change. LHA’s
official motto is “Participation Makes a Difference,” and we constantly reflect as an organization the importance of expanding opportunities for residents to participate in creating solutions and healthier communities.

Our community-centered approach has helped the City of
Santa Ana and the County to actively connect with hardto-reach populations to be active participants of equitable active transportation policy and strategies. The activities have been multi-generational at various community settings (e.g. schools, parks and trails, community-based organizational partners, neighborhoods, bus stops, trails, among others). We have previously collaborated with municipalities and city staff from Santa Ana, Tustin, Newport, Costa Mesa, Los Alamitos, and Anaheim.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION OUTREACH & EDUCATION EXPERIENCE:
• Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan*
• Central Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan*
• Santa Ana Active Transportation Plan*
• Los Alamitos Active Transportation Plan*
• Downtown Santa Ana Wellness Corridor Project
• Santa Ana Active Streets: Active Transportation Leadership Program • Santa Ana Downtown Complete Streets Plan
• Santa Ana Bicycle Safety Education and Outreach
Campaign
• Santa Ana Bike Safety Education Campaign
• Outreach and Educational Campaign to Improve Bicyclist and Pedestrian Safety in the City of Santa Ana
• SCAG Go Human Local Community Engagement and
Safety Mini-Grants: Santa Ana “Safe Where You Are”
• SCAG Go Human Local Community Engagement and
Safety Mini-Grants: Placentia Active Transportation,
Health and Safety for Community (2020)
*Project experience in collaboration with KTUA

MARK THOMAS
Mark Thomas is a recognized
industry leader in the planning,
design, and delivery of bicycle and pedestrian mobility improvements. While their experience covers a wide array of transportation projects, one of their key focus areas is the planning and design of active transportation, complete streets, and bicycle and pedestrian improvements and enhancements based on National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO), Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM), Caltrans Design Information Bulletin (DIB) 94 Guidance, and other Complete Street guidelines. They have in-depth knowledge of design details and state-ofthe-practice design solutions.

Mark Thomas is actively planning and implementing bicycle and pedestrian enhancements throughout the State. This
work has involved analyzing current deficiencies, reviewing traffic and safety data, meeting with communities and stakeholders, and developing feasible and fundable solutions. The firm’s experience includes preparing multimodal safety analysis and preliminary design for improvements throughout the City of Santa Ana, leading the development of regional bikeways in Orange County, and supporting the planning efforts and completing final design for 70-blocks of bikeway improvements in Downtown Sacramento.

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
• Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan*
• Upland Mobility Master Plan*
• Santa Ana Standard Avenue Bikeway Project*
• OCTA Orange County Bike Connectors (Gap Closure
Feasibility Study)*
• Orange County Countywide Active Transportation Plan
(OC Active)*
*Project experience in collaboration with KTUA
City Council 16 – 13 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 9
Firm Team & Experience | Team Chart
Stakeholders
KTUA
Joe Punsalan
Principal-In-Charge
Parks & Transportation Planner
KTUA
Alex Samarin
Project Manager
GIS Technical Manager
City of Santa Ana
STAFFING COMMITMENT: Key KTUA personnel are available for the duration of the project. Key staff will not be removed or replaced without the prior consent of the City of Santa Ana.

KTUA STAFFING PLAN
KTUA utilizes the Resource Planning
module of Deltek VantagePoint for
weekly staff scheduling, allowing us
to accurately schedule staff resources with the appropriate experience to meet project deadlines. Staffing
responsibilities include:

1. The assigned project manager
is involved in the review of the
scope, the preparation of the fee
and the contract negotiation.

2. The project manager works with
the client to develop and validate
the overall goals and objectives
of the project, as well as identify
project issues, requirements, budgets, milestones, deadlines, and design parameters.

3. A project schedule is developed
by the project manager indicating
all submittals and review periods.

The QC manager reviews the
schedule to assure that adequate
time has been allocated for implementation of the quality control process, including review and
coordination of consultant work,
and corrections and revisions
identified in the QC process.

4. The KTUA policy is to assign a
team of experienced professionals that stay with the project from concept through completion, ensuring seamless integration from one phase to the next.

D
Mark Thomas
Role: Civil Engineer
Jackie Young, PE, ENV SP
Concept Design Lead
Shawna McCann, RSP1
Concept Design
KTUA
Jacob Leon
Senior Advisor/Senior Associate Planner
KTUA
Isabel Pérez
Deputy Project Manager/Planner
KTUA
Marina Varano
Senior Planner
Madeline Pysher
GIS Analyst
Latino Health Access
Role: Community Engagement
Rosario “Charis” Galeas
Community Engagement and
Advocacy Program Director
Nallely Enriquez
Program Coordinator
City Council 16 – 14 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 10
Joe Punsalan | Principal-in-Charge | Parks & Transportation Planner Joe Punsalan is a Principal and oversees KTUA’s parks and active transportation planning practice for clients throughout California. He is actively engaged in citywide park master plan projects and large-scale active transportation planning projects such as complete street plans and corridor studies, active transportation plans, vision zero, and first/last mile connectivity.

He is responsible for scope development, data analysis, public engagement and facilitation of workshops, focus group and stakeholder meetings, report writing, grant writing and reporting, and staff and consultant team management. He has a background in GIS for mapping, research and analysis, and uses a simplified approach to displaying complex methodologies.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Santa Ana Safe Mobility Santa Ana Update (Santa Ana Vision Zero) • City of Santa Ana Active Transportation Plan
• City of Santa Ana Central Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan • City of Santa Ana Downtown Complete Streets Plan
• City of Santa Ana Standard Avenue Protected Bikeway
• City of El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan
• City of Upland Mobility Master Plan
• City of El Centro Imperial Avenue Complete Streets Plan D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA & Subconsultant Key Personnel Resumes

REGISTRATIONS
• ITE PTP
• LEED GA
• GISP, GIS Certification
Institute #53646
• League of American
Bicyclists League
Certified Instructor
#2005
Alex Samarin | Project Manager | GIS Technical Manager
As an Associate, Alex Samarin provides technical oversight for GIS workflows, and guides GIS analysis for assessing the impact of planning projects. He has a broad range of experience applying GIS in utilities management, transportation planning, and environmental analysis.

Alex is passionate about projects that provide mutually beneficial solutions to the human-environment relationship. His previous work spanned regional transportation modeling, regional habitat connectivity, and utility network mapping.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of El Monte Vision Zero Action Plan
• City of Upland Mobility Master Plan
• OCTA Active Transportation Plan
• City of Monte Sereno Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan • City of Salinas Active Transportation Plan
• Imperial County Active Transportation Plan
• City of Irvine Active Transportation Plan

REGISTRATIONS
• 2021 GISP, GIS
Certification
Institute 160988,
Exp. 3/25/2027
Isabel Pérez | Deputy Project Manager | Planner
Isabel Pérez joined KTUA as a Planner and Designer after earning her B.A. in Urban Studies and Planning from the University of California San Diego. Her technical skills include the Adobe Creative Suite, ArcGIS, AutoCAD, Lumion, Revit, and SketchUp – all of which she actively uses to create high-quality graphics, three-dimensional models, and renderings for a range of projects involving trails, active transportation, complete streets, and parks and recreation planning.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Upland Mobility Master Plan
• City of El Centro Imperial Avenue Complete Streets Plan • City of Rialto Safety Action Plan - SS4A
• City of Salinas Active Transportation Plan
• City of Montebello First Mile Last Mile Plan
• Town of Apple Valley Complete Streets Action Plan

REGISTRATIONS
• LEED GA
City Council 16 – 15 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 11
D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA & Subconsultant Key Personnel Resumes Marina Varano | Senior Planner
Marina recently completed her Master’s in City and Regional Planning from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo and holds a B.S. in Environmental Studies from the University of California, Santa Barbara. She has served as Senior Planner on numerous active transportation and park master plans since joining KTUA.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Upland Mobility Master Plan
• City of Arroyo Grande Active Transportation Plan
• City of Bellflower Parks and Recreation Master Plan
• City of Moorpark Parks Master Plan
• Moreno Valley Parks, Community Services, and Trails Master Plan Madeline Pysher | Planner | GIS Analyst
Madeline Pysher recently joined KTUA as Planner and GIS Analyst. Having earned a Bachelors of Arts in Urban Planning and Sustainable Development, with a double minor in Geographic Information Services and Environmental Justice, Madeline specializes in equity mapping and analysis. During her time as a student, Madeline worked as a Planning Intern for a Metropolitan Planning Organization and Regional Transportation Planning Organization. She is skilled in ArcGIS, Microsoft Access, SketchUp, Adobe Creative Suite, and Python.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Upland Mobility Master Plan
• Town of Apple Valley Complete Streets Action Plan
• City of La Verne Parks and Recreation Master Plan
• County of Riverside Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV), Phase 4 • Hollister Ranch Coastal Access Program, Santa Barbara County

REGISTRATIONS
• LEED GA
Jacob Leon | Senior Advisor | Senior Associate Planner | Outreach Facilitator Jacob Leon is dedicated to parks and recreation planning, trail and open space planning, complete streets planning, and community outreach. His project responsibilities entail project management, existing conditions analysis, overseeing community engagement, facilitating community workshops and special meetings with elected officials, and developing comprehensive project recommendations. He is passionate about raising awareness of the benefits of thoughtful urban planning and public realm design, equitable access to parks and open space, and safe transportation infrastructure. His passion for nature, parks, trails and genuine community engagement reinforces his commitment to clients and the communities he works in throughout California.

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
• City of Santa Ana Downtown Zone Complete Streets Plan • City of Santa Ana Central Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan • City of Santa Ana Active Transportation Plan
• City of Santa Ana Standard Avenue Protected Bikeway
• City of El Centro Imperial Avenue Complete Streets Plan • City of El Centro Combined Active Transportation/Safe Routes to School Master Plan • SBCTA Safe Routes to School
• City of Menifee Active Transportation Plan

REGISTRATIONS
• LEED GA
City Council 16 – 16 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 12
D Firm Team & Experience | KTUA & Subconsultant Key Personnel Resumes Subconsultant – Latino Health Access (LHA)
ROSARIO “CHARIS” GALEAS

COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM DIRECTOR
Born and raised in Sinaloa, Mexico, Charis was the first of her family to graduate from college with a bachelor’s degree in Psychology. Since she was a teenager, she
enjoyed planning and implementing community events. It
can be said that from an early age she learned the value of community engagement.

Currently she directs the projects and education initiatives within the Children and Youth Engagement Department,
where she seeks to create a space that is safe, fun, and inspiring for children, youth and their families, helping them to grow and activate their peers to promote health equity.

She engages a variety of stakeholders in Orange County to work collaboratively with residents in improving the quality of life in Low income and disinvested neighborhoods.

RELEVANTEXPERIENCE
• Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan
• Santa Ana Street Lighting Master Plan
• Santa Ana Downtown Complete Streets Plan
• Central Santa Ana Complete Streets Plan
• Santa Ana Bicycle Safety Education Outreach Campaign
• Santa Ana Active Transportation Plan
• SCAG Go Human Community Streets Grant: Bike,
Walk & Roll OC
• OCTA Bus Stop Safety and Accessibility Plan
NALLELY ENRIQUEZ | PROGRAM COORDINATOR
Nallely received her bachelor’s degree in Public Health Sciences from the University of California, Irvine, in 2019, where she volunteered at Latino Health Access’ Santa Ana Active Transportation Plan and fell in love with grassroots work. Her experience allowed her to follow a path to partner with the community and advocate for equitable practices and she joined the LHA team in 2019.

Nallely is currently the Program Coordinator in the Children and Youth Engagement Department. In this role, she leads programs that provide leadership and mentorship support to youth in county-wide campaigns focused on substance
use prevention. She also supports schools with bike and pedestrian safety activities. Nallely served on the Leadership Committee for Santa Ana Active Streets for three years and as co-chair, using her role to advocate for more bike and pedestrian safety for the youth and community in Santa Ana.

RELEVANTEXPERIENCE
• Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan
• Santa Ana Street Lighting Master Plan
• OCTA Bus Stop Safety and Accessibility Plan
• Santa Ana Active Transportation Plan
• Santa Ana Active Streets Leadership Committee Chair
Subconsultant – Mark Thomas
JACKIE YOUNG, PE, ENV SP | CONCEPT DESIGN LEAD
Jackie has 15 years of experience in civil engineering
projects like roadway improvement and transportation
planning. Experienced in minimizing utility and right-of-way impacts by staying involved in the utility coordination process and coordinating with other disciplines and property owners. She is also experienced in storm water pollution prevention, stormwater management, and drainage. Her
skills include using Autodesk Civil 3D, Computer-Aided
Design (CAD), and engineering and construction drawings to develop and manage PS&E plans. Registrations:

CA ENV SP 64981, CA PE C97037.

RELEVANTEXPERIENCE
• La Paz Interim Phase Improvements, Laguna Niguel
• Laguna Canyon Rd. Improvements PA & ED, Laguna Beach
• Quail City Trail Improvements, Mission Viejo
• Vine Avenue/B Street Improvements, Ontario
SHAWNA MCCANN, RSP1 | CONCEPT DESIGN
Shawna has 7 years of transportation planning experience.

She has a thorough understanding of government laws,
rules, and regulations governing transportation policies, urban development, transportation best practices, and public funding sources. She is experienced at providing grant writing services as well, working with multiple agencies to submit state and federal applications. Registration: Roadway Safety Planner 1 (RSP1).

RELEVANTEXPERIENCE
• Safe Mobility Santa Ana Plan
• Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan
• Pred for South Yale Corridore Improvements
(University Dr. to South of I-405), Irvine
• HealthyRC Active Transportation Plan, Rancho
Cucamonga
• Wesminster Safe Routes to School, Westminster
• SLV Schools Complex Circulation and Access Study,
Santa Cruz County
City Council 16 – 17 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 13
E Proposed Work Plan/Understanding of Need
Project Understanding
KTUA recognizes the City’s commitment to
enhancing safety for residents and visitors by improving transportation facilities for all users. The goal of the Vision Zero Plan Update is to revise
the recently completed Vision Zero Plan (2024)
by incorporating new policies aimed at increasing
safety across all modes of transportation, as well
as outlining programs and projects for implementation. This update also includes the addition of seven new corridors, as directed by the City
Council, along with expanded outreach in each
of the six wards. The following scope of work
details the tasks and deliverables
associated with this project.

TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT

1.1 Kickoff Meeting
Within the first month from the issuance of the Notice to Proceed, KTUA will schedule and facilitate a virtual kick-off meeting. KTUA will prepare the agenda and the meeting
notes. Recommended objectives for the kickoff meeting
may include, but not limited to:
• Establish communication channels and protocols
• Review project objectives
• Refine project work plan and schedule
• Identify known preliminary issues
• Develop ideas and strategies for community
engagement
• Develop a list of background data/plans to request
and review

1.2 Project Coordination
KTUA will interface with City staff and other agencies
as necessary, as well as encourage their participation
in discussions and presentations with the wider design
team at periodic milestones wherever deemed necessary.

Feedback from City staff and other agencies is important to meet the goals of the periodic project milestones to ensure a timely progression of the project from inception to the final deliverable. The following activities will be anticipated once the Notice to Proceed (NTP) is authorized and as the project progresses:
• Project Kick-off Meeting
• Monthly Project Development Team (PDT) Meetings
• Six (6) Community Meetings (one community meeting at
each City’s Ward)
• Project Schedule Management
• Monthly Progress Reports
• Monthly Cost Accounting
• Quality Assurance / Quality Control
Up to 12 monthly PDT Meetings are especially important to provide opportunities to comment and make course-correction on interim deliverables that KTUA will prepare.

KTUA will prepare, update, and provide City staff with
action items prior to meetings. City staff will be participating and guide the development of the SAVZ Plan Update throughout the process.

TASK 1 DELIVERABLES:
• Meeting agendas, meeting minutes, updated schedules,
invoices, and monthly progress reports
TASK 2: DATA COLLECTION

2.1 Data Collection
KTUA will collect data that will include, but not be limited to:
traffic counts, collision data from the past ten years using the City’s Crossroads dataset, 85% tile posted speed limits, lane configurations, street classifications, traffic citations, street lighting, trees, transit stops, transit boarding/alighting, street crossings, and adjacent land uses. KTUA has many of these datasets in-house from work on the previous Complete Street and Active Transportation Plans, which will expedite this process. Data collected from the existing Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan may be utilized, as needed.

TASK 2 DELIVERABLES:
• Technical Memorandum of data collection summary
TASK 3: COMMUNITY OUTREACH SURVEYS AND

STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

3.1 Develop Community Engagement Plan
Long-time outreach partner Latino Health Access (LHA) will develop an Outreach and Engagement Plan (O&E Plan)
outlining the selected approach to community outreach
throughout the project. The O&E Plan will identify, and match outreach strategies based on stakeholder communication
needs and their appropriate level of engagement. The O&E Plan will include key messages, schedules, and descriptions of outreach activities and opportunities, with emphasis placed on engagement methods to drive attendance at the workshops. The O&E Plan will describe the use of social media engagement opportunities and language translation/ needs, among other elements. The team will:
• Develop key messages
• Develop a stakeholder contact information database
• Establish meeting dates and create materials, then
disseminate meeting notice flyers via e-mail to neighborhood associations, community-based organizations, youth groups, schools, and churches for distribution to their members, per the O&E Plan; make follow-up phone
calls to key organizations to confirm receipt, ask organizations to post on their websites and distribute through their social networks City Council 16 – 18 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 14
E Proposed Work Plan/Understanding of Need
• Solicit input from other relevant agencies and organizations at different phases in the development of the Vision Zero Action Plan Update, Santa Ana Unified
School District, the Police Department and other local
law enforcement agencies, etc.
• E-mail notices to project database contacts

3.2 Workshops
LHA has been ingrained in the community for many years
and has built an extensive network to solicit feedback
and gain trust with Santa Ana residents. LHA will lead
promoting and organizing one (1) community workshop in
each of the six (6) wards to gather input and feedback on safety concerns, priorities for improvements, and community-specific needs related to the selected corridors.

A total of six (6) workshops will be conducted as part of established community meetings, wherever possible. For
the coordination, implementation and promotion of community workshops, LHA will have constant communication with representatives of neighborhood associations and
employees of the Santa Ana Neighborhood Initiatives and Environmental Services and attend its meetings. Time will be invested in promoting and inviting to community workshops during in-person activities such as City and SAUSD community events, neighborhood association meetings,
LHA and other partners classes and events, etc. The KTUA team will develop materials such as flyers, announcements, and social media messages to promote the workshop and
garner online engagement to collect community feedback.

Promotional material distribution will be conducted through the City’s existing social media accounts and LHA’s extensive network and platforms (Webpage, Facebook, Instagram, Newsletters) to collect community recommendations and to promote the community workshops, we will post the workshop flyers and modify the educational videos created in the last phase of SAVZ and use them again as an educational tool that will allow us to inform the community about project and as an invitation to community workshops. We will also ask our community partners to promote flyers and videos on their social media platforms.

TASK 3 DELIVERABLES:
• Community Outreach and Engagement Plan
• Outreach materials (flyers, announcements, social media messaging, etc.)
• Community workshop materials and summaries
Santa Ana community workshop
TASK 4: ANALYSIS:

4.1 Crash Analysis
To conduct the collision analysis, KTUA will use guidance from the following sources:
• Local Roadway Safety Manual (LRSM)
• Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool
• The Caltrans Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program
(SSARP) Guidelines
• The current SAVZ plan (to provide longitudinal consistency) Analysis will consist of a systematic review and study of the data collected, particularly the collisions within the past ten years (numbering more than 20,000 datapoints citywide)
with a special focus on all pedestrian and bicycle-involved collisions. People walking and biking are more vulnerable than other road users and therefore giving them increased attention and countermeasures will more likely reduce
fatality rates. The analysis will review collisions to identify correctable collision patterns such as, but not limited to:
time of day, day of the week, lighting conditions, age of parties, year-by-year trends, primary collision factors, type of collisions, severity of injury, and fatalities.

The first step in the collision analysis involves the selection of focus collision types. In this case, focus collision types can be determined by the City based on the known
prevalent collision types or causes. The focus will be on fatality and high injury collisions rather than Property Damage Only (PDO) crashes. The next step, selecting focus facilities, involves analyzing the physical characteristics of intersections and roadways associated with each collision to determine patterns in collision.

TASK 4 DELIVERABLES:
• Update SAVZ Update plan maps, tables, charts, graphics, text, etc. based on crash analysis, as needed
City Council 16 – 19 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 15
E Proposed Work Plan/Understanding of Need
TASK 5: LOCATION PRIORITIZATION AND FIELD REVIEW

5.1 Project Selection
Based on a review of the existing Vision Zero Action Plan’s collision analysis and identified projects, the KTUA team will work with the City and community to select five (5) new corridors/street segments that present the highest risk to vulnerable roadways users (bicyclists and pedestrians). The selection process will be consistent with the Vision Zero Action Plan and select corridors that were not incorporated into the original process. The selection process may include collision patterns, severity of injuries, and proximity to school, parks, or other pedestrian/bicycle generating uses. Additionally, two (2) other corridors will be identified based on discussions with City staff for a total of seven (7) projects. Up to three (3) site visits will be conducted for the selected corridors while school is in session at high-collision rate segments or intersections.

5.2 Develop Corridor Designs
KTUA will host a focus call with City staff to discuss a rough outline of features to implement along the study corridors based on right-of-way and traffic constraints, traffic operations, and desired improvements. The focus meeting will occur prior to the detailed development of the corridor concepts in AutoCAD. Subsequently, the KTUA team will
develop corridor concept plans at the seven (7) identified corridors/street segments for 1-mile in length each. A total of seven (7) corridors will be designed for feasibility and grant pursuits. Each corridor segment will be developed at a scale of 1” = 50’ and shown on an aerial graphic using AutoCAD base drawings consistent with the Vision Zero
Action Plan. Refer to the representative rendered concept plans previously prepared for the City.

5.3 Corridor Renderings
To support these concepts, one (1) 3D cross-section will be developed for each corridor to illustrate the improvements which will also be used as part of the community engagement process. A total of seven (7) cross-section renderings will be developed.

Crash Tree
City Council 16 – 20 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 16
E Proposed Work Plan/Understanding of Need
Santa Ana Street Section
TASK 5 DELIVERABLES:
• Site visits/Field Reviews of seven (7) new corridor/street segments
• AutoCAD Corridor concept plans for each of the seven
(7) new corridor/street segments
• 3D cross-section for each of the seven (7) new corridor/ street segments
TASK 6: ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT PLAN

6.1 Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan Assessment and Plan Updates KTUA will conduct a comprehensive review of the existing Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan including but not limited to the goals, strategies, and current corridor selection.

Through this process and in combination with community
feedback, KTUA will also identify strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement and updates to maps,
tables, exhibits, appendices, and all other items related to the addition of the seven (7) new corridor/street segments.

Updates can also include new language, plans/recommendations, and any other relevant information as deemed necessary that will support and provide an explanation
how non-priority corridors/street segments can be systematically improved. Updates will be made at the discretion of KTUA and in coordination with City Staff.

TASK 6 DELIVERABLES:
• Summary of consistency review of the Santa Ana Vision Zero Plan
• As needed updates to maps, tables, exhibits, appendices, and all other items related to the addition of the seven (7) new corridor/street segments
City Council 16 – 21 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 17
E Proposed Work Plan/Understanding of Need
TASK 7: DEVELOP SAFETY STRATEGIES

7.1 Develop Safety Strategies
Based on the collisions identified, roadway design, roadway conditions, and other trends identified from the crash analysis, KTUA, with support from Mark Thomas
will develop tailored safety strategies and interventions (countermeasures) for each of the five selected corridors.

Santa Ana Vision Zero exhibits and drawings/plans will
incorporate the new corridors/street segments and align with current best practices in traffic safety. The team will review published research and the latest trends to identify potential countermeasures with the greatest potential to address collision types. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) and Crash Modification Factors (CMF) Clearinghouse will be utilized heavily for this task. CMF factors will be used to estimate the expected number of collisions after implementing a given countermeasure at a specific intersection or MPAH corridor (the lower the CMF, the greater the
expected reduction in collisions).

KTUA will use an innovative approach such as complete
streets design, traffic calming measures, improved signage, enhanced crosswalks, and protected bike lanes. Strategies may include but are not limited to:
• Implementation of traffic calming measures (speed
humps/cushions, new or mod. traffic signals, etc.)
• Enhanced crosswalks and pedestrian signals
• Dedicated bike lanes or shared-use paths
• Improved street lighting and signage
• Implementation of landscaped concrete mediums
TASK 7 DELIVERABLES:
• List/table outlining safety strategies and interventions (countermeasures)
TASK 8: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

8.1 Develop Implementation Plan
The KTUA team will create an updated implementation
plan outlining the timeline, responsibilities, and budget for each safety strategies and interventions (countermeasure).

Coordination will be conducted with relevant City departments and agencies to ensure alignment with broader transportation and urban planning initiatives.

TASK 8 DELIVERABLES:
• Implementation plan of safety strategies and interventions (countermeasures) of the seven (7) new corridor/ street segments
TASK 9: DEVELOP COST ESTIMATES

9.1 Cost Estimates
Based on the corridor Conceptual Engineering Plans developed, quantities will be generated, and unit pricing applied to prepare a conceptual level cost estimate using the ATP Cost Estimate format (Attachment F). Unit costs will be determined based on the following:
• Review of local City examples
• Review of Mark Thomas projects for City and other
agencies
• Collaboration with City staff
The cost estimates will be prepared for each of the seven (7) street segments. Project cost estimates will be reviewed with City staff to verify estimated costs by project phase to position for successful implementation.

TASK 9 DELIVERABLES:
• Cost estimates for each of the seven (7) new corridor/ street segments
TASK 10: DRAFT AND FINAL VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE

10.1 Draft Vision Zero Plan Update
KTUA will update the Santa Ana Vision Zero into a Draft Update to include the new corridors/segments. As needed, the other maps, tables, exhibits, appendices, etc. related to the addition of the seven (7) new corridors, plans/recommendations, and any relevant information, will be updated.

The community engagement section will also be updated to include summaries of the six (6) total workshops conducted in each of the City’s six (6) wards. This plan will be provided for City review for two rounds of revisions.

10.2 Final Vision Zero Plan Update
Upon completion of the City’s review, comments will be
addressed but KTUA. KTUA will develop a Final Updated Vision Zero Action Plan to include all components mentioned above in the Scope of Work. This plan will be provided to the City for two rounds of revisions. Ten (10) hard copies of the final plan will be printed and delivered as well as one (1) single electronic copy will be delivered electronically.

TASK 10 DELIVERABLES:
• Draft Updated Vision Zero Action Plan
• Final Updated Vision Zero Action Plan
• Ten (10) Printed copies of the Final Vision Zero Action Plan Update
• One (1) Electronic copy of the Final Vision Zero Action Plan Update
City Council 16 – 22 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 18
F Certifications | Attachment A: Proposer’s Certification and Proposal Item Pricing City Council 16 – 23 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 19
F Certifications | Attachment B: References
City of Santa Ana Mauricio Castaneda
Public Works Agency, M-43 714-647-5643
[email protected]
$179,965 Completed 2024
Evaluated citywide traffic safety through a comprehensive analysis of traffic collisions. KTUA provided data collection, analysis, GIS map production, and led the safety evaluation and field reviews for street segments and intersections that present the highest risk to vulnerable roadways users.

City of Upland Alan French
460 N Euclid Ave 909-931-4235
Upland, CA 91786 [email protected]
$269,862 Ongoing 2025
City of El Centro Andrea Montaño
1275 W. Main Street 760-337-4599
El Centro, CA 92243 [email protected]
$329,250 Completed 2/6/2025
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92702
Conducted a policy review and data analysis to understand existing conditions; spearheaded a comprehensive community engagement process to understand community needs; and developed project recommendations to improve safe and efficient active transportation and public transit options.

KTUA conducted an existing conditions investigation,
extensive public engagement, and collaborated with local agencies to develop conceptual drawings for Imperial Avenue.

Santa Ana Safe Mobility (Vision Zero)
Upland Mobility Master Plan
Imperial Ave. Complete Streets Plan
City Council 16 – 24 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 20
F Certifications | Attachment C: Proposer’s Statement
City Council 16 – 25 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 21
F Certifications | Attachment D: Non-Collusion Affidavit City Council 16 – 26 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 22
F Certifications | Attachment D: Non-Collusion Affidavit City Council 16 – 27 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 23
F Certifications | Attachment E: Non-Lobbying Certification City Council 16 – 28 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 24
F Certifications | Attachment F: Non-Discrimination Certification City Council 16 – 29 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 25
F Certifications | Attachment F: Non-Discrimination Certification City Council 16 – 30 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 26
F Certifications | Attachment G: Subcontractor Designation Form $54,900
$50,660
City Council 16 – 31 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 27
x
F Certifications | Attachment H: CARB Fleet Compliance Certification KTUA has reviewed California Air Resources
Board policies, rules and regulations and are
familiar with the requirements of Title 13,
California Code of Regulations, Division 3,
Chapter 9 and complies with these guidelines.

KTUA does not operate a fleet of vehicles,
nor will they be used for this project. KTUA
will use all necessary caution and attention to
comply with these guidelines.

City Council 16 – 32 11/4/2025
SANTA ANA VISION ZERO PLAN UPDATE | 28
F Certifications | Attachment I: Statement Regarding CWA Requirements City Council 16 – 33 11/4/2025

Page 1 of 9 ends
← All documents from this meeting