City Council
17 –
99 6/2/2026
OPERATED EQUIPMENT RATES- INCLUDES OPERATOR & FUEL/INSURANCE SURCHARGE ITEM NO. EQUIPMENT NAME
PREV.
WAGE
STRAIGHT
TIME
PREV.
WAGE
OVER-
TIME
PREV.
WAGE
DOUBLE
TIME/
HOLIDAY
C1340
Enclosed Van- 28 Foot w/Liftgate
$132.00
$165.00
$198.00
C1350
Enclosed Van- 45 to 48 Foot
$144.00
$177.00
$210.00
C1355
Enclosed Van- 53 Foot w/Liftgate
$146.00
$179.00
$212.00
C1360
End Dump Truck
$151.00
$184.00
$217.00
C1370
Roll-Off Truck
$144.00
$177.00
$210.00
C1380
Roll-Off Truck (Rocket Launcher)
$150.00
$183.00
$216.00
C1390
Roll-Off Truck & Trailer (Tandem)
$150.00
$183.00
$216.00
C1410
Tractor, 3-Axle
$202.00
$255.00
$308.00
C1420
Water Truck (1,500 gal)
$210.00
$263.00
$316.00
C1010
Fuel/Insurance Surcharge
Included in Rates
C1425
Overnight Demurrage on Vacuum Tanker
$300.00
/day
C1430
Overnight Demurrage on End Dump or Dry Van
$100.00
/day
FOOTNOTES:
· Fuel/Insurance Surcharge
Fuel/insurance surcharge is included in rates.
· Overtime
Overtime is any period worked in excess of 8 hours per day Monday through Friday and up to 12 hours worked on Saturdays.
City Council
17 –
100
6/2/2026
OPERATED EQUIPMENT RATES- INCLUDES OPERATOR & FUEL/INSURANCE SURCHARGE ITEM NO. EQUIPMENT NAME
PREV.
WAGE
STRAIGHT
TIME
PREV.
WAGE
OVER-
TIME
PREV.
WAGE
DOUBLE
TIME/
HOLIDAY
· Double Time
· Holiday Time
Holidays per government holiday calendar.
· A four hour minimum applies to all equipment and personnel called out.
Double time is any period worked in excess of 12 hours per day Monday through Saturday, and all day on Sundays and government holidays. · All charges are on a time and materilas basis calculated portal to portal from/to United's fleet terminal located in Industry, CA.
City Council
17 –
101
6/2/2026
UNOPERATED EQUIPMENT RATES- OPERATOR BILLED SEPARATELY; FUEL INCLUDED WHERE APPLICABLE ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
EMERGENCY RESPONSE/UTILITY EQUIPMENT
C2000
Biowaste Trailer
240.00
$
day
C2025
Pick-Up Truck
40.00 $
hr
C2030
Stakebed Truck W/Liftgate
60.00 $
hr
C2035
Utility Truck (E.R.)
69.00 $
hr
EXCAVATING/LOADING EQUIPMENT
C2110
Bobcat Loader With Trailer
114.00
$
hr
C2125
Bobcat Loader Breaker Attachment
225.00
$
day
C2130
Bobcat Loader Grappler Attachment
140.00
$
day
C2145
Excavator- Mini Excavator With Trailer
99.00 $ hr
C2150
Forklift With Trailer (4000 thru 6000 lb. Capacity)
330.00
$
day
C1010
Fuel/Insurance Surcharge
Included in Rates
FOOTNOTES:
· Fuel/Insurance Surcharge
Fuel/insurance surcharge included in rates where applicable .
· A four hour minimum applies to all equipment and personnel called out. · All charges are on a time and materilas basis calculated portal to portal from/to United's fleet terminal located in Industry, CA.
City Council
17 –
102
6/2/2026
PERSONNEL RATES
ITEM NO. STAFF POSITION
PREV.
WAGE
STRAIGHT
TIME
PREV.
WAGE
OVER-
TIME
PREV.
WAGE
DOUBLE
TIME/
HOLIDAY
C3015
Administrative Clerk
$49.00 $74.00 $99.00
C3020
Confined Space Rescue Specialist
$181.00 $227.00 $273.00
C3025
Chemist
Cost + 10%
Cost + 10%
Cost + 10%
C3030
Environmental Safety Coordinator
$165.00 $211.00 $257.00
C3035
Equipment Operator (for Unoperated Equipment Rates) $137.00 $208.00 $266.00 C3040
Industrial Hygienist
Cost + 10% Cost + 10% Cost + 10%
C3045
Project Manager
$151.00 $196.00 $254.00
C3050
Supervisor
$144.00 $190.00 $236.00
C3050
Lead Technician
$121.00 $192.00 $250.00
C3055
Technician
$121.00 $192.00 $250.00
SUB.
Landscaper (Landscape Systems, Inc.)
Cost + 10% (See Attached Subcontractor Quote)
SUB.
Pump Maintenance Technician (Multi-W Systems, Inc.) Cost + 10% (See Attached Subcontractor Quote) C3060
Subsistence: No Layover (8-Hour Period)
$22.00
/meal/man
C3065
Subsistence: With Layover
$295.00
/man
FOOTNOTES:
· Overtime
· Double Time
· Holiday Time
Holidays per government holiday calendar.
· A four hour minimum applies to all equipment and personnel called out.
Overtime is any period worked in excess of 8 hours per day Monday through Friday and up to 12 hours worked on Saturdays.
Double time is any period worked in excess of 12 hours per day Monday through Saturday, and all day on Sundays and government holidays. · All charges are on a time and materilas basis calculated portal to portal from/to United's fleet terminal located in Industry, CA.
City Council
17 –
103
6/2/2026
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
CLEANING EQUIPMENT
C4010
Hydro-Dig Attachment (Soil Surgeon)
240.00
$
day
C4015
Hydrotech High Pressure Wash Unit (Applies up to 8 Hours)
73.00 $
hr
C4020
Hydrotech High Pressure Wash Unit (Applies over 8 Hours) 649.00
$
day
C4025
Jetter Unit, Towable (4000 psi) (Applies up to 8 Hours)
85.00 $
hr
C4030
Jetter Unit, Towable (4000 psi) (Applies over 8 Hours)
758.00
$
day
C4035
Mercury Vacuum
240.00
$
day
C4040
Mercury Vacuum, HEPA Filter
181.00
$
ea
C4045
Pressure Washer- Cold Water (2500-3000 psi)
450.00
$
day
C4050
Pressure Washer- Hot Water (3600 psi)
450.00
$
day
C4060
Wet Dry Vacuum (16 gal)
43.00 $
day
C4065
Wet Dry Vacuum, HEPA Filter
90.00 $
ea
CORING/SAMPLING EQUIPMENT
C4125
Hazcat Kit
211.00
$
day
C4130
Hazcat Test
68.00 $
test
CUTTING EQUIPMENT
C4200
Chain Saw (16")
85.00 $
day
C4235
Sawzall/Skill Saw (Includes 1 Blade)
61.00 $
day
C4240
Sawzall/Skill Saw Additional Blade
18.00 $
ea
City Council
17 –
104
6/2/2026
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
C4300
Air Blower (Electric)
110.00
$
day
C4305
Air Blower (Spark Proof)
181.00
$
day
C4310
Air Gas Monitor (5-Gas)
109.00
$
day
C4315
Confined Space Gear
421.00
$
day/per crew
C4320
Cylinder- Bottled Air Cylinder (300 cu. ft.)
109.00
$
day
C4325
Cylinder- Bottled Air Cylinder Recharge (300 cu. Ft.)
103.00
$
ea
C4330
Cylinder- Positive Pressure Mask W/Egress & Air Line
68.00 $
day
C4335
Cylinder- Scott Air Pack Cylinder (Self-Contained 60 Minute) 145.00
$
day
C4340
Cylinder- Scott Air Pack Cylinder (Extra 60 Minute)
73.00 $
day
C4345
Hazardous/Acid Suit (Level A)
271.00
$
day
C4350
Hazardous Suit (Level B)
103.00
$
day
C4360
Lifeline & Safety Harness
61.00 $
day
C4370
Pre & Post Lead Exposure Blood Test
91.00 $
ea
C4375
Tripod Manlift
54.00 $
day
C4380
Venturi Air Blower (Air Compressor Not Included)
169.00
$
day
TRAFFIC CONTROL EQUIPMENT
C4500
Arrow Board
115.00
$
day
C4505
Traffic Cones (DOT Rated)
2.00 $
day/ea
C4510
Traffic Signs
11.00 $
day/ea
City Council
17 –
105
6/2/2026
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
MISCELLANEOUS SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
C4610
Air Compressor (110-150 CFM)
217.00
$
day
C4640
CCTV Camera- Push Camera
73.00 $
hr
C4655
Drum Dolly
25.00 $
day
C4660
Drum Grabber
61.00 $
day
C4665
Drum Pump (Poly)
22.00 $
day
C4675
Drum Vacuum
120.00
$
day
C4680
Generator (5.5 KW)
91.00 $
day
C4695
Hose- Fire Hose (50' L x 2 1/2" Dia.)
38.00 $
day
C4700
Hose- Discharge Hose (25' L x 3" Dia.)
49.00 $
day
C4710
Jack Hammer (Pneumatic)
97.00 $
day
C4715
Ladder- 28' Extension
95.00 $
day
C4720
Ladder- 8' Folding
43.00 $
day
C4730
Lighting- Auxiliary Lighting (Excludes Power Source)
91.00 $
day/ea
C4740
Magnetic Patch- Small
601.00
$
day
C4745
Magnetic Patch- Large
1,202.00
$
day
C4750
Miscellaneous Tools (Ropes, Buckets, Wrenches)
49.00 $
day
C4760
Pallet Jack
41.00 $
day
C4770
Pump- 2" Submersible Pump
91.00 $
day
C4780
Pump- 3 Inch Trash Pump
109.00
$
day
C4785
Pump- Wilden M Series Diaphragm Pump
120.00
$
day
City Council
17 –
106
6/2/2026
SUPPORT EQUIPMENT RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
C4790
Rivet Buster/Chipper (Includes 1 bit)
85.00 $
day
C4795
Rivet Buster/Chipper Extra Bits
19.00 $
ea
C4805
Rotary Hammer
97.00 $
day
C4825
Shovel, Push Broom, Squeegee, or Scraper
7.00 $
day
C4830
Water Tank, Towable (500 gal)
169.00
$
day
City Council
17 –
107
6/2/2026
RENTAL EQUIPMENT RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
C5000
Bin Delivery (30 Mile Radius)
510.00
$
load
C5020
Bin Liner- Dewatering Bin Fabric Liner (130 micron)
185.00
$
ea
C5025
Bin Liner- Roll-Off Bin Plastic Liner
38.00 $
ea
C5005
Bin Rental- 10 & 15 Yard Roll-Off Bins
16.00 $
day
C5010
Bin Rental- 20 Yard Dewatering Roll-Off Bins
52.00 $
day
C5015
Bin Rental- 20 & 40 Yard Roll-Off Bins
22.00 $
day
C5035
Ramp Rental
28.00 $
pair/day
C5040
Ramp Rental- Towable Ramp
121.00
$
day
C5030
Storage Tank Rental, Skid Mounted (7500-10000 gal.)
47.00 $
day
City Council
17 –
108
6/2/2026
CONSUMABLES RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
ABSORBENTS/CLEANING AGENTS/NEUTRALIZERS
C6000
Absorbent (Superfine)
19.00 $
bag
C6005
Absorbent Sock (2" Dia, ZPG)
9.00 $
ft
C6010
Absorbent Booms (3" Diameter x 10' Long)
30.00 $
ea
C6015
Absorbent Pads
198.00
$
bale
C6020
All Purpose Cleaner (Fabuloso)
14.00 $
gal
C6025
Bleach
14.00 $
gal
C6030
Citric Acid
9.00 $
lb
C6035
Caustic Soda (Bead)
9.00 $
lb
C6040
Caustic Soda (Flake)
6.00 $
lb
C6045
Gold Crew
79.00 $
gal
C6050
Soda Ash
6.00 $
lb
C6055
Simple Green / Kleen Green
19.00 $
gal
C6060
Sugar
6.00 $
lb
C6065
Vermiculite
73.00 $
bag
C6070
Neozyme
64.00 $
gal
CONTAINERS/DRUMS
C6101
Cardboard Box-- 4' to 8' Long (For Light Tubes)
19.00 $
ea
C6100
Cubic Yard Box With Pallet
116.00
$
ea
C6105
Drum Liner- 55 gal.
8.00 $
ea
City Council
17 –
109
6/2/2026
CONSUMABLES RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
C6110
Fiber Drum- 20 gal. D.O.T. (New)
113.00
$
ea
C6115
Fiber Drum- 30 gal. D.O.T. (New)
140.00
$
ea
C6120
Fiber Drum- 55 gal. D.O.T. (New)
201.00
$
ea
C6125
Fiber Drum- 55 gal. D.O.T. (Reconditioned)
35.00 $
ea
C6135
Overpack Poly Drum- 95 gal. (New)
487.00
$
ea
C6140
Overpack Poly Drum- 95 gal. (Reconditioned)
160.00
$
ea
C6142
Overpack Poly Drum-85 gal. (New)
379.00
$
ea
C6144
Overpack Poly Drum-85 gal. (Reconditioned)
146.00
$
ea
C6145
Overpack Steel Drum- 85 gal. (New)
515.00
$
ea
C6150
Overpack Steel Drum- 85 gal. (Reconditioned)
154.00
$
ea
C6155
Pail- 5 gal. D.O.T. (With Snap/Screw Lid)
32.00 $
ea
C6160
Poly Drum Open Top- 15 gal. D.O.T. (New)
103.00
$
ea
C6162
Poly Drum Closed Top- 15 gal. D.O.T., White (New)
160.00
$
ea
C6165
Poly Drum Open Top- 30 gal. D.O.T. (New)
142.00
$
ea
C6170
Poly Drum Open Top- 30-gal. D.O.T. (Reconditioned)
90.00 $
ea
C6171
Poly Drum Closed Top- 30-gal. D.O.T., White (New)
86.00 $
ea
C6175
Poly Drum Closed Top- 55 gal. D.O.T. (Reconditioned)
53.00 $
ea
C6180
Poly Drum Open Top- 55 gal. D.O.T. (New)
175.00
$
ea
C6185
Poly Drum Open Top- 55-gal. D.O.T. (Reconditioned)
99.00 $
ea
C6189
Poly Drum Closed Top- 55-gal. D.O.T., Clear (New)
87.00 $
ea
C6190
Poly Drum Closed Top- 55-gal. D.O.T., White (New)
165.00
$
ea
City Council
17 –
110
6/2/2026
CONSUMABLES RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
C6195
Poly Tote- 275 gal. D.O.T. (New)
506.00
$
ea
C6200
Sample Jar
7.00 $
ea
C6205
Sample Tubes (Glass)
5.00 $
ea
C6207
Steel Drum Open Top- 30 gal. D.O.T. (New)
203.00
$
ea
C6209
Steel Drum Closed Top- 30 gal. D.O.T. (New)
162.00
$
ea
C6210
Steel Drum Open Top- 55 gal. D.O.T. (Reconditioned)
106.00
$
ea
C6211
Steel Drum Open Top- 55 gal. D.O.T. (New)
228.00
$
ea
C6212
Steel Drum Closed Top- 55 gal. D.O.T. (New)
228.00
$
ea
C6213
Steel Drum Closed Top- 55 gal. D.O.T. (Reconditioned)
53.00 $
ea
C6215
Super Sack
87.00 $
ea
PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
C6300
Gloves- Rubber Gloves
8.00 $
pair
C6305
Gloves- Viton Gloves (For PCBs)
326.00
$
pair
C6310
P.P.E. (Gloves, Tyvek, and Respirator)
61.00 $
day/person
C6315
Rain Gear- Heavy Weight
39.00 $
ea
C6320
Rain Gear- Light Weight
37.00 $
ea
C6325
Respirator Cartridge- Dual Half-Face
30.00 $
day
C6330
Respirator Cartridge- Dual Full-Face
59.00 $
ea
C6335
Respirator Cartridge- Single
26.00 $
ea
C6340
Saranex Suit
69.00 $
ea
C6345
Sigel Suit (Acid Suit)
70.00 $
day
City Council
17 –
111
6/2/2026
CONSUMABLES RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
C6350
Tyvek Suit (White)
18.00 $
ea
C6355
Tyvek Suit (Poly)
28.00 $
ea
MISCELLANEOUS CONSUMMABLES
C6400
Bags- Bio-Waste Bags (30 gal.)
2.00 $
ea
C6405
Bags- Heavy Duty Plastic Bags
2.00 $
ea
C6407
Bags- Air Bags
30.00 $
ea
C6410
Caution Tape (Harris)
44.00 $
roll
C6415
Cement-Regular (90 lb. Bag)
16.00 $
ea
C6420
Cement-Ready Mix (60 lb. Bag)
10.00 $
ea
C6425
Chlor-D-Tect Test Kit
37.00 $
ea
C6430
Duct Tape
15.00 $
roll
C6435
Flex Hose- 6" Disposable
18.00 $
ft
C6440
Flex Hose- 4" Disposable
5.00 $
ft
C6445
Hudson Sprayer
55.00 $
ea
C6450
Labels- Hazardous Waste Labels
2.00 $
ea
C6455
Patch Kit
47.00 $
ea
C6460
Placards (Aluminum)
10.00 $
ea
C6465
Plastic Sheeting, 10 mil (Black, 20'W x 100'L)
273.00
$
roll
C6475
Plastic Sheeting, 4 mil (Clear, 20'W x 100'L)
96.00 $
roll
C6480
Plastic Sheeting, 6 mil (Clear, 20'W x 100'L)
166.00
$
roll
C6485
Plastic Sheeting, 10 mil (Clear, 20'W x 100'L)
273.00
$
roll
City Council
17 –
112
6/2/2026
CONSUMABLES RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
UNIT
C6490
Pump- Disposable Hand Pump
63.00 $
ea
C6495
Rags (Box)
86.00 $
box
C6500
Rags (Half Box)
43.00 $
half box
C6505
Sand Bag
6.00 $
ea
C6510
Shrink Wrap- 20" Stretch Film
81.00 $
roll
C6515
Silt Fencing (3'W x 100'L)
83.00 $
ea
C6520
Silt Fencing (3'W x 300'L)
247.00
$
ea
C6525
Track Mats
366.00
$
ea
C6530
Wattle (8.5" Dia. x 25' Long)
66.00 $
ea
City Council
17 –
113
6/2/2026
OUTSIDE SERVICE RATES
ITEM NO.
EQUIPMENT NAME
RATE
C7105
Subcontractor Markup
Cost Plus 10%
DISPOSAL CHARGES
C7100
Disposal Fee
Cost Plus 10%
C7110
Washout Fee- Hazardous Waste
Cost Plus 10%
C7115
Washout Fee- Non-Hazardous Waste
Cost Plus 10%
C7120
Washout Fee- Disposal Facility
Cost Plus 10%
LABORATORY CHARGES
C7200
Laboratory Analysis
Cost Plus 10%
C7205
United Pumping Profile Charge (Administrative)
80.00 $
/each
City Council
17 –
114
6/2/2026
QUOTE
Lawnscape System
s
, Inc.
5215 State Street
Montclair, CA 91763
Phone: (800) 255
-
5296
Fax
:
(909) 627
-
0032
carl
@lawnscape.com
TO:
Ramon Menjivar
United Storm Water
14000 Valley Blvd
City of
Industry CA
91746
(
626) 890
-
7104
SALESPERSON
JOB
PAYMENT TERMS
DUE DATE
C1
Rate Sheet
-
Santa Ana Storm Drain Weed Abatement
Net
45 Days
N
/A
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
PER
HOUR
TOTAL
1 Prevailing Wage Job including m
obilization to Job Site
for
removal of weeds, grasses, plants near stormwater
conveyance channels
per man hour including hand tools
$
95.45 TBD
2 Large equipment for tree removals and chipping of
branches into tree truck
. Large Spray Truck for chemical
applications
$
185.95
TBD
3 Chemical spraying to prevent re
-
growth of areas after
cle
aring with approved herbicides.
$95.45
TBD
4 Irrigation System Maintenance & Repair
$1
2 5.95
5 Bio
-
Swale Planting as needed
$95.45
TBD
Note: These are Prevailing Wage Rates
S u b t o t a l
S a l e s T a x
T o t a l
Any questio
ns please contact: Carl Clifton
, at
909
-
627
-
2000 x10
3 .
This is a quotation covers all costs for the above services including labor, material, vehicles, insurance, taxes, etc.
To accept this quotation, sign here and return:
________________________________
____________________
THANK YOU FOR YOUR B
USINESS!
City Council
17 –
115
6/2/2026
Transportation included.
City Council
17 –
116
6/2/2026
(
VXUD FH HTXLUHPH WV
&R W DFWR
V DOO S RF H D G PDL WDL IR W H G DWLR RI W H
D HHPH W W H IROOR L L V D FH
FR H D HV
( (
&R W DFWR
V DOO PDL WDL OLPLWV RI L V D FH FR H D H L W H IROOR L PL LP P DPR WV D G V DOO EH DW OHDVW DV E RDG DV
•
RPPHUFLDO H HUDO LDELOLW
& /
, V D FH 6H LFHV 2IILFH )R P & FR H L
& / R D RFF H FH EDVLV L FO GL S RG FWV D G FRPSOHWHG RSH DWLR V S RSH W GDPD H ERGLO L M D G SH VR DO DG H WLVL L M LW OLPLWV R OHVV W D
SH RFF H FH D G
D H DWH
•
XWRPRELOH LDELOLW
$/
, V D FH 6H LFHV 2IILFH )R P &$ FR H L &RGH D D WR LW FRPEL HG VL OH OLPLWV RI
, W H H H W &R W DFWR GRHV RW
PDL WDL FRPPH FLDO D WRPRELOH OLDELOLW L V D FH &LW LOO DFFHSW H LGH FH RI SH VR DO D WRPRELOH L V D FH
S R LGHG W DW V F SROLF LV H GR VHG IR E VL HVV VH D G S R LGHV FR H D H LW D PL LP P OLPLW RI 5HT L HG SROLF OLPLWV FD EH PHW LW S LPD D G PE HOOD H FHVV L V D FH SROLFLHV
•
RUNHUV RPSH VDWLR
:&
DV HT L HG E W H 6WDWH RI
&DOLIR LD LW VWDW WR
OLPLWV D G (PSOR H V /LDELOLW , V D FH LW OLPLW RI R OHVV W D
SH
DFFLGH W SH HPSOR HH SH SROLF IR ERGLO L M R GLVHDVH 7 LV HT L HPH W FD EH DL HG LI
&R W DFWR
DV R HPSOR HHV
&R W DFWR
DWWHVWV W DW LWV R H V FRPSH VDWLR
FR H D H H WH GV WR DOO SH VR V R LOO EH R L LW W H &LW GH W H D HHG VFRSH RI VH LFHV
•
ROOXWLR H DO LDELOLW
3// :LW OLPLWV R OHVV W D SH RFF H FH R FODLP D G SROLF D H DWH
•
URIHVVLR DO LDELOLW
(UURUV D G PLVVLR V
3/ LW OLPLWV R OHVV W D
SH RFF H FH R FODLP D G D H DWH
,I
&R W DFWR
PDL WDL V E RDGH FR H D H D G R L H OLPLWV W D W H PL LP PV V R DER H &LW HT L HV D G V DOO EH H WLWOHG WR W H E RDGH FR H D H D G R W H L H OLPLWV PDL WDL HG E
&R W DFWR
$ D DLODEOH L V D FH S RFHHGV L H FHVV RI W H VSHFLILHG PL LP P OLPLWV RI L V D FH D G FR H D H V DOO EH D DLODEOH WR &LW
W HU VXUD FH UR LVLR V
7 H L V D FH SROLFLHV D H WR FR WDL R EH H GR VHG WR FR WDL W H IROOR L S R LVLR V
& /
D G
$/
SROLFLHV &LW
RI 6D WD $ D
LWV &LW &R FLO LWV RIILFH V RIILFLDOV
HPSOR HHV D H WV D G RO WHH V D H WR EH FR H HG DV DGGLWLR DO L V HGV LW HVSHFW WR OLDELOLW D LVL R W RI R R RSH DWLR V SH IR PHG E R R EH DOI RI W H &R W DFWR
L FO GL PDWH LDOV SD WV HT L
SPH W D G SH VR HO I LV HG L
FR HFWLR LW V F R R RSH DWLR V
& / $/ D G :& SROLFLHV , V D FH FRPSD LHV D HHV WR DL H DOO L WV RI V E R DWLR D DL VW &LW LWV &LW &R FLO LWV RIILFH V RIILFLDOV HPSOR HHV D H WV D G RO WHH V IR ORVVHV SDLG GH W H WH PV RI D SROLF LF D LVH I RP R SH IR PHG E
&R W DFWR
IR &LW
City Council
17 –
117
6/2/2026
$OO HT L HG L V D FH SROLFLHV )R D FODLPV HODWHG WR W LV FR W DFW &R W DFWR
V
L V D FH FR H D H V DOO EH S LPD D G D L V D FH PDL WDL HG E &LW LWV &LW
&R FLO LWV RIILFH V RIILFLDOV HPSOR HHV D H WV R RO WHH V V DOO RW FR W LE WH LW LW
$OO HT L HG L V D FH SROLFLHV $ VH H DELOLW RI L WH HVW S R LVLR P VW DSSO IR DOO W H DGGLWLR DO L V HGV H V L W DW
&R W DFWR
V
L V D FH V DOO DSSO VHSD DWHO WR
HDF L V HG D DL VW RP D FODLP LV PDGH R V LW LV E R W H FHSW LW HVSHFW WR W H L V H V OLPLWV RI OLDELOLW
(DF L V D FH SROLF HT L HG H HL V DOO S R LGH W DW FR H D H V DOO RW EH FD FHOHG V VSH GHG RLGHG HG FHG L FR H D H R L OLPLWV R
H H HG E W H
FD LH R PDWH LDOO F D HG H FHSW DIWH W L W GD V S LR LWWH RWLFH DV EHH L H WR &LW 7H GD V S LR LWWH
RWLFH
V DOO EH S R LGHG WR &LW IR
SROLF FD FHOODWLR R
R
H H DO G H WR R
SD PH W
&H WLILFDWH ROGH R HDF ( LGH FH RI , V D FH FH WLILFDWH V DOO EH &LW RI 6D WD $ D $WWH WLR & DL )RVWH
&L LF &H WH 3OD D
0
6D WD $ D &$
7 H DPH D G ORFDWLR RI W H S RMHFW R H H W V R OG EH L FO GHG L W H HVF LSWLR RI 2SH DWLR V VHFWLR RI HDF FH WLILFDWH
HOI
VXUHG HWH WLR V
6HOI
L V HG HWH WLR V P VW EH GHFOD HG WR D G DSS R HG E W H &LW &LW PD HT L H &R W DFWR WR S F DVH FR H D H LW D OR H HWH WLR R S R LGH S RRI RI DELOLW WR SD ORVVHV D G HODWHG L HVWL DWLR V FODLP DGPL LVW DWLR D G GHIH VH H SH VHV LW L W H HWH WLR
FFHSWDELOLW RI VXUHUV
, V D FH LV WR EH SODFHG LW L V H V
D W R L HG WR FR G FW E VL HVV L W H VWDWH RI
&DOLIR LD LW D F H W $ 0 HVW DWL RI R OHVV W D $ 9,, OHVV RW H LVH DFFHSWDEOH WR &LW
HULILFDWLR RI R HUD H
&R W DFWR
V DOO I LV &LW LW R L L DO &H WLILFDWHV RI , V D FH L FO GL
DOO HT L HG
DPH GDWR H GR VHPH WV R FRSLHV RI W H DSSOLFDEOH SROLF OD D H HIIHFWL FR H D H HT L HG E W LV FOD VH D G D FRS RI W H HFOD DWLR V D G ( GR VHPH W 3D H RI W H & / SROLF OLVWL DOO SROLF H GR VHPH WV WR ( WLW EHIR H R EH L V R H H IDLO H WR REWDL
W H HT L HG GRF PH WV S LR WR W H R EH L L V DOO RW DL H W H &R W DFWR V
REOL DWLR WR S R LGH W HP &LW HVH HV W H L W WR HT L H FRPSOHWH FH WLILHG FRSLHV RI DOO HT L HG L V D FH SROLFLHV L FO GL H GR V
HPH WV HT L HG E W HVH VSHFLILFDWLR V DW D
WLPH
ODLPV DGH ROLFLHV
,I D RI W H HT L HG SROLFLHV S R LGH FR H D H R D FODLPV
PDGH EDVLV
7 H
HW RDFWL H
G
DWH P VW EH V R D G P VW EH EHIR H W H GDWH RI W H FR W DFW R W H EH L L RI R
, V D FH P VW EH PDL WDL HG D G H LGH FH RI L V D FH P VW EH S R LGHG IR DW OHDVW
W HH HD V DIWH FRPSOHWLR RI R
,I FR H D H LV FD FHOHG R R
H H HG D G RW HSODFHG LW D RW H FODLPV
PDGH
SROLF IR P LW D
HW RDFWL H
G
DW
H S LR WR W H FR W DFW HIIHFWL H GDWH &R
W DFWR
P VW
S F DVH H WH GHG HSR WL FR H D H IR D PL LP P RI W HH
HD V DIWH FRP
SOHWLR RI
R
XEFR WUDFWRUV
City Council
17 –
118
6/2/2026
&R
W DFWR
V DOO HT L H D G H LI W DW DOO V E
FR W DFWR V PDL WDL L V D FH
PHHWL DOO W H
HT L HPH WV VWDWHG H HL D G &R W DFWR V DOO H V H W DW &LW
LV D DGGLWLR DO L V HG R
L V D FH
HT L HG
I RP
V E
FR W DFWR V
SHFLDO LVNV RU LUFXPVWD FHV
&LW HVH HV W H L W WR PRGLI W HVH HT L HPH WV L FO GL OLPLWV EDVHG R W H DW H RI W H LV S LR H SH LH FH L V H FR H D H R RW H VSHFLDO FL F PVWD FHV
City Council
17 –
119
6/2/2026
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 18
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
June 2, 2026
TOPIC: Measure M2 Funding Eligibility 2026-27 Renewal
AGENDA TITLE
Resolutions to Maintain Measure M2 Funding for the FY 2026-27 Eligibility Cycle Per the Orange County Transportation Authority Measure M2 Eligibility Guidelines (Non- General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Adopt a Resolution confirming the status and update of the Pavement Management Plan per Orange County Transportation Authority 2026-27 Measure M2 eligibility requirements.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2 PROGRAM
2. Adopt a Resolution confirming the status and update of the City's 2026 Local Signal Synchronization Plan to maintain eligibility for Measure M2 Program funding.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CONCERNING THE UPDATE OF THE LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M (M2) PROGRAM GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
In November 1990, Orange County voters approved Measure M, a one-half cent sales tax increase for 20 years, to fund transportation projects in Orange County. In November 2006, voters approved the Renewal of Measure M (M2) for an additional thirty years, effective April 2011. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) administers Measure M2 revenues and expenditures. In total, OCTA expects to receive over $13.2 Billion over the 30-year period that Measure M2 is in effect (2011-2041).
City Council
18 –
1 6/2/2026
Measure M2 Funding Eligibility 2026-27 Renewal
June 2, 2026
5 7
8 3
OCTA collects the one-half cent sales tax revenue and distributes it among freeway, transit, and local street improvements as shown in the following graphic:
Santa Ana receives Measure M2 funds in two categories: Local Fair-Share (LFS) (formulaic distribution) and Competitive Grants. Generally LFS funding is utilized by the City to maintain and rehabilitate streets based on the City’s Pavement Management Program, while Competitive Grant funds are used to construct transportation projects such as street widenings and bike lanes in accordance with the adopted General Plan’s Mobility Element and the County’s Master Plan of Highways.
In order to qualify for both funding categories, Santa Ana (along with all Orange County Cities) must adhere to strict requirements and satisfy 13 eligibility categories. Fulfilling M2 eligibility requirements allows the City access to over $6 million annually in LFS funding. Since the implementation of Measure M2 in April 2011, the City of Santa Ana has received approximately $71.9 million in Local Fair Share funding and approximately $185.2 million in Competitive Grant funding.
LFS has been a funding source for various street improvement projects primarily funding an annual neighborhood Local Street Preventative Maintenance (slurry seal) project. Additionally, LFS funds have contributed toward both the Warner Avenue Improvements projects and the Bristol Street Improvements as well as the Main Street Slurry Seal and Resurfacing project. Future uses of LFS funds in the fiscal year 26/27 Capital Improvement Program include Bristol Street Corridor Regional Traffic Synchronization and Industrial Street Repairs in addition to the annual neighborhood Local Street Preventative Maintenance project.
City Council
18 –
2 6/2/2026
Measure M2 Funding Eligibility 2026-27 Renewal
June 2, 2026
5 7
8 3
The City has been successful in being awarded Measure M2 Competitive Grant funding for a number of projects. Grant funds allowed for the construction of the Bristol and Warner corridor improvements as well as 10th & Flower Park stormwater capture, bus stop improvements, and various traffic signal synchronization projects. Future grant funded projects are to be determined as future awards are announced but will include Fairview Street Improvements (9th St. to Trask Ave.).
OCTA determines local agency annual eligibility for M2 funds based upon the local agency's successful and timely submittal of required documentation. As part of the requirements due by June 30, 2026, the City must update, and adopt via resolution, a Pavement Management Plan (PMP) biennially (Exhibit 1). The PMP is the City’s strategic plan to manage the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and necessary costs to improve paved roads (Exhibit 2). A copy of the PMP with a certification must be submitted to OCTA by June 30, 2026.
Additionally, the City must update and adopt via resolution the Local Signal Synchronization Plan (LSSP) every three years (Exhibit 3). The LSSP is a planning document that helps guide traffic signal synchronization and related capital investment (Exhibit 4). The purpose of traffic signal synchronization is to relieve congestion on the arterial roadway system during peak traffic demand and avoid formation of gridlock conditions. Measure M2 includes a robust Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization funding program to aid in regional signal synchronization. The City's 2026 update to LSSP is required to be consistent with OCTA's Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan, and must be affirmed via resolution by June 30, 2026, to continue eligibility for Net Revenues as part of Measure M2.
Staff recommends City Council adopt the proposed resolutions. Adoption of these resolutions by June 30, 2026 is required to meet Measure M2 Program guidelines, ensure that the City continues to receive Measure M2 Local Fair Share funds each year, and remain eligible for Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) grant funding.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
City Council
18 –
3 6/2/2026
Measure M2 Funding Eligibility 2026-27 Renewal
June 2, 2026
5 7
8 3
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact at this time. The recommended actions will maintain the City's eligibility to receive Measure M2 funds. Upon meeting OCTA eligibility requirements, the City of Santa Ana is anticipated to receive $6,198,919 in LFS funds (as of February 2026 estimate) and an undetermined amount in M2 competitive funds for FY 2026-27.
If the recommended action is not approved, the City stands to lose Measure M2 LFS revenue and eligibility to apply for various future OCTA comprehensive funding programs.
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Resolution for Pavement Management Plan
2. 2026 Pavement Management Plan
3. Resolution for Local Signal Synchronization Plan
4. 2026 Local Signal Synchronization Plan
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director, Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council
18 –
4 6/2/2026
Resolution 2026-XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
A RE
SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
ANA CONCERNING THE STATUS AND UPDATE OF THE
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE MEASURE M2
PROGRAM
BE
IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Sec
tion 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. The City of Santa Ana is required to meet eligibility requirements and submit eligibility verification packages to the Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) in order to remain eligible to receive Measure M2 funds.
B.
On a biennial basis, the City of Santa Ana is required to adopt and update a Pavement Management Plan (“PMP”), using the required format, regarding the status of road pavement conditions and implementation of the PMP.
C.
The City of Santa Ana is required to provide a plan that manages the preservation, rehabilitation, and maintenance of paved roads by analyzing pavement life cycles, assessing overall system performance costs, and determining alternative strategies and costs necessary to improve paved roads.
Section 2. The City Council hereby declares that the PMP is in conformance with the PMP Submittal Template provided in the Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines.
Section 3. The City o f Santa Ana hereby ado pts a PMP and has pr ovided an updated PMP report, using the required format, to OCTA.
Section 4. The City Council authorizes the Executive Director of the Public Works Agency, the City Engineer, or his or her designee to sign the PMP certification form.
Section 5. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
EXHIBIT 1
City Council
18 –
5 6/2/2026
Resolution 2026-XX
ADOPTED this ___ day of _________, 2026.
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED
AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:
Kyle Nellesen
Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers_______________________________________ NOES: Councilmembers_______________________________________ ABSTAIN: Councilmembers_______________________________________ NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers_______________________________________ CERTI
FICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, JENNI
FER L. HALL, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2026- XX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on .
Date:
City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
EXHIBIT 1
City Council
18 –
6 6/2/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
2026 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
May, 2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
7 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... E-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1
2.0 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 Inventory ........................................................................................................................ 2-1
2.2 Planning ......................................................................................................................... 2-2
2.3 Data Collection ............................................................................................................... 2-2
2.4 Data Entry ...................................................................................................................... 2-2
2.5 Analysis .......................................................................................................................... 2-2
3.0 PAVEMENT NETWORK ..................................................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Functional Classifications ............................................................................................... 3-2
3.2 Pavement Condition Index ............................................................................................. 3-4
3.3 Existing Pavement Condition ......................................................................................... 3-5
4.0 MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION STRATEGIES .................................................. 4-1
4.1 Treatment Types and Associated Costs ........................................................................ 4-1
4.2 Funding .......................................................................................................................... 4-5
4.3 Budget Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 4-6
4.3.1 Existing Funding .................................................................................................... 4-7
4.3.2 Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI .......................... 4-10
4.3.3 Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI ........................................ 4-13
APPENDIX A: ENTIRE PAVEMENT NETWORK PCI REPORT
APPENDIX B: ARTERIAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN
APPENDIX C: LOCAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN
APPENDIX D: OCTA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE REPORT 2024 - Pavement Management Plan Certification
- Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan
- Executive Summary
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
8 6/2/2026
Table Of Contents
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program ii
FIGURES
Figure E-1: PCI Distribution for 2022, 2024 and 2026 .............................................................. E-1 Figure 2-1: Sample Pavement Deterioration Curve ................................................................... 2-3 Figure 3-1: Entire Pavement Network Summary ....................................................................... 3-1 Figure 3-2: Arterial Street ........................................................................................................... 3-2 Figure 3-3: Local Street ............................................................................................................. 3-3 Figure 3-4: Current PCI Distribution (Entire Pavement Network) .............................................. 3-5 Figure 3-5: Current PCI Distribution (Arterial Network) .............................................................. 3-6 Figure 3-6: Current PCI Distribution (Local Network) ................................................................ 3-7 TABLES
Table E-1: Funding Alternatives Summary ............................................................................... E-4 Table 3-1: Current Entire Pavement Network Summary ............................................................ 3-1 Table 3-2: Pavement Condition Index and Treatment Type ...................................................... 3-4 Table 3-3: PCI Distribution Comparison (2022, 2024 vs. 2026) ................................................ 3-5 Table 3-4: PCI Distribution ......................................................................................................... 3-8 Table 4-1: Cost by Condition (Arterial Network) ........................................................................ 4-3 Table 4-2: Cost by Condition (Local Network) ........................................................................... 4-3 Table 4-3: Existing Funding (Entire Pavement Network) ........................................................... 4-8 Table 4-4: Existing Funding (Arterial Network) .......................................................................... 4-8 Table 4-5: Existing Funding (Local Network) ............................................................................. 4-9 Table 4-6: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Entire Pavement Network) .................................................................................... 4-11 Table 4-7: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Arterial Network) ................................................................................................... 4-11 Table 4-8: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Local Network) ...................................................................................................... 4-12 Table 4-9: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Entire Pavement Network) .................................................................................... 4-14 Table 4-10: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Arterial Network) ................................................................................................... 4-14 Table 4-11: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Local Network) ...................................................................................................... 4-15
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
9 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program
ACRONYMS
AC Asphalt Concrete
ASTM American Society of Testing Materials
AV Avenue
BLVD Boulevard
CDBG Community Development Block Grant
CIP Capital Improvement Program
CIR Circle
CIR Cold In-Place Recycling
City City of Santa Ana
COMM Common
CT Court
CTB Cement Treated Base
DR Drive
EB East Bound
FDR Full Depth Reconstruction
FWY Freeway
FY Fiscal Year
GIS Geographical Information System
GN Glen
GPCE General Plan Circulation Element
HUTA Highway Users Tax Account
LN Lane
M&R Maintenance and Rehabilitation
MPAH Master Plan of Arterial Highways
NB North Bound
OCTA Orange County Transportation Authority
PCC Portland Cement Concrete
PCI Pavement Condition Index
PCIaw Average Area-Weighted Pavement Condition Index
PDC Pavement Deterioration Curve
PL Place
PMP Pavement Management Program
RD Road
RR Railroad
RSRP Residential Street Repair Program
SB South Bound
SF Square Feet
ST Street
WB West Bound
WY Way
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
10 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program E-1-1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Santa Ana (City) Public Works Agency utilizes StreetSaver and geographical information system (GIS) to develop the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to provide an accurate inventory of the current and projected pavement condition of all public roadways and to implement a seven-year roadway maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) program to maximize the return from available existing funding for street pavement. The PMP’s ultimate goal is to effectively strategize short and long-term usages of current and future limited funding to restore and maintain the entire street pavement network at “Good” condition or better.
The City currently manages 454 miles of streets for a total of approximately 93.4 million square feet (SF) of paved surfaces. To be consistent with the City General Plan Circulation Element Master Plan of Streets and Highways and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH), the entire street pavement network i s organized into two networks (arterial and local) depending on its functional classifications (i.e. major, primary, secondary, and collector arterial streets; residential and non-residential local streets). There are 129.3 miles (28% of entire pavement network) in the arterial network and 324.5 miles (72% of entire pavement network) in the local network. To assist planning maintenance needs, the streets are also arranged into over 4,170 sections and classified by surface types – Asphalt Concrete (AC) or Portland Cement Concrete (PCC).
Figure E-1: PCI Distribution for 2022, 2024 and 2026
Entire Network Arterial Network Local Network
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
11 6/2/2026
Executive Summary
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program E-1-2 Pavement condition inspections are performed biennially for both the arterial and local networks.
Figure E-1 shows a comparison of the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) distribution between the 2022, 2024 and 2026 inspections. The PCI is a numerical value ranging from 0 for deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life to 100 for new or recently rehabilitat ed pavement.
Generally, the PCI value is expressed as an area -weighted PCI (PCI aw) to provide a more representative value. A PCI value is computed for each street section based on the pavement distresses found within that section during an inspection. Inspections provide the data utilized in analysis and surface treatment recommendations for each street section; however, the PCI values shall be utilized for planning purposes in determining the surface treatment types and are not intended to replace soun d engineering judgment. In general, the City’s strategies involve the utilization of surface seals, such as crack sealing or slurry sealing for preventive maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) of streets in “Good” condition and major M&R plans typically co nsist of overlays, such as thin overlays, for “Fair” condition streets; resurfacing, such as structural overlays or cold-in-place recycling (CIR), for “Poor” condition streets; and reconstruction, such as cement-treated base (CTB) or full depth reconstruction (FDR), for “Very Poor” condition streets.
A fully integrated PMP has had a positive effect on improving the City’s entire pavement network by developing efficient M&R strategies and analyzing the effect of various funding alternatives on the pavement c onditions. The strategies include forecasting optimal time for M&R needs, providing cost-effective alternatives for halting the deterioration of existing pavement, improving the overall condition of the entire pavement network, and reducing the backlog of M&R work over the next seven years. To carry forward one of the City’s main objectives in providing a safe, reliable, efficient, and comfortable driving environment, this PMP report analyzes various M&R strategies, the effect of the City’s existing Capit al Improvement Prog ram (CIP) funding on the street pavement system, and projected funding to both maintain and improve existing PCIaw over a seven-year plan.
With existing funding of just under $115 million for the entire pavement network over the seven - year period from Fiscal Year ( FY) 2026/27 through FY 2032/33, the entire pavement network existing PCIaw of 75.2 is projected to decrease by eight (8) percent to 69 at the end of the seven- year cycle under existing funding levels. Individually, the arterial and local networks are projected to experience a negative result in existing PCIaw, eleven (11) percent arterial decrease and eight (8) percent local decrease. Furthermore, the backlog for the entire pavement network is projected to increase by 58 percent from $325.6 million in the first year to $595.6 million in the seventh year.
If the existing PCI aw of 75.2 were to be maintained at the end of the seven -year cycle, a total of $36.3 million in additional funds calculated at about $5.1 million annually would be required; thus providing for a total alternative funding level of just over $150.5 million through FY 2032/33. The additional funding would be applied to both the arterial and local networks at 62 percent ($22.5 million) and 38 percent ($13.8 million), respectively. Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for the entire pavement network is projected to increase by 42 percent from $325.6 million in the first year to $462.8 million in the seventh year.
If the existing PCIaw were to be improved by three (3) points to 78.2 at the end of the seven-year cycle, a total of $46.0 million in additional funds calculated at about $6.5 million annually would EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
12 6/2/2026
Executive Summary
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program E-1-3 be required; thus providing for a total alternative funding level of over $160.2 million through FY 2032/33. The additional funding would be applied to both the arterial and local networks at 62 percent ($ 28.5 million) and 38 percent ($ 17.5 million), respectively. Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for the entire pavement network is projected to increase by 21 percent from $325.6 million in the first year to $393.4 million in the seventh year.
Overall, the conclusion dra wn from this PMP report is that the backlog for the entire pavement network is evenly distributed across both the arterial and the local network. Additionally, existing funding levels in the City CIP will not keep pace with rehabilitation needs over the n ext seven years. Since preserving street condition and performance should be a priority to provide motorists with safety assurances, the City’s goal over the next seven years is to acquire sufficient pavement M&R funding to sustain the entire street pavem ent network at “Good” condition or better. By achieving this goal, the City will remain eligible for the reduced local match requirements for the renewed Measure M2 Competitive grant until FY 2032/33.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
13 6/2/2026
1.0 Introduction
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program E-1-4 Table E-1: Funding Alternatives Summary
Existing Funding Alternative Funding
(Maintain Existing PCI)
Alternative Funding
(Improve Projected PCI)
Entire
Pavement
Network
Arterial
Network
Local
Network
Entire
Pavement
Network
Arterial
Network
Local
Network
Entire
Pavement
Network
Arterial
Network
Local
Network
2026 PCIaw with
Existing Funding1 75 72 77 75 72 77 75 72 77
2033 PCIaw with
Existing Funding2 69 64 71
2033 PCIaw with
Alternative Funding3 75 72 79 78 75 82
FY 2026/27 Backlog4
$354,834 $145,482 $209,352 $354,834 $145,482 $209,352 $354,834 $145,482 $209,352 FY 2032/33 Backlog4
$595,574 $244,185 $351,389 $462,793 $189,745 $273,048 $393,441 $161,311 $232,130
7-yr Preventive M&R
Existing Funding5 $47,536 $0 $47,536 $47,536 $0 $47,536 $47,536 $0 $47,536 7-yr Major M&R
Existing Funding6 $67,264 $45,002 $22,262 $67,264 $45,002 $22,262 $67,264 $45,002 $22,262 7-yr Total
Existing Funding7 $114,800 $45,002 $69,798 $114,800 $45,002 $69,798 $114,800 $45,002 $69,798 7-yr Major M&R
Additional Funding8 $35,700 $22,134 $13,566 $45,300 $28,086 $17,214 7-yr Total
Alternative Funding9 $150,474 $93,294 $57,180 $160,182 $99,313 $60,869 Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
1. 2026 PCI w Existing Funding: PCI yielded as a result of M&R work (existing PCI).
2. 2033 PCI w/ Existing Funding: PCI yielded at the end of the 7-year plan as a result of M&R work using existing funding.
3. 2033 PCI w/ Alternative Funding: PCI yielded @ the end of the 7-year plan as a result of M&R work using alternative funding.
4. Backlog: Total estimated M&R work left unfunded during the listed fiscal year.
5. 7-yr Preventive M&R Existing Funding: Existing funding for preventive M&R work from FY 2026/27 to FY 2032/33.
6. 7-yr Major M&R Existing Funding: Existing funding for major M&R work from FY 2026/27 to FY 2032/33.
7. 7-yr Total Existing Funding: Sum of existing funding from FY 2026/27 to FY 2032/33.
8. 7-yr Major M&R Additional Funding: Additional funding needed for major M&R work to reach the listed goal from FY 2026/27 to FY 2032/33.
9. 7-yr Total Alternative Funding: Sum of existing & additional funding needed required to reach the listed goal from FY 2026/27 to FY 2032/33.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
14 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 1-1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Since public streets are utilized for moving people and freight and they are vital to the City of Santa Ana (City) economy, preserving their condition and performance should be a priority. The City Public Works Agency has developed the Pavement Management Program (PMP) to monitor and maintain the City street system utilizing StreetSaver, MyRoads® and geographic information system (GIS). The City’s PMP has been developed to assist City personnel generate a solid and reliable Capital Improvement Program (CIP) based on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of the streets to sustain a desirable level of pavement performance on a network scale. The PMP’s ultimate goal is to effectively strategize short and long-term usages of current and futur e limited funding to restore and maintain the entire pavement network at “Good” condition or better.
Additionally, StreetSaver was selected as the pavement management software to be utilized by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and all member agencies in Orange County; therefore, with the City of Santa Ana’s ongoing management of StreetSaver, the City’s PMP is in compliance with this OCTA requirement.
The purpose of the PMP is to:
• Provide an accurate current inventory and pavement conditions of all public roadways; • Predict future pavement condition with and without work; • Develop a roadway maintenance program;
• Prioritize and recommend the most cost-effective roadway repairs; • Implement a 7-year roadway maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) program; • Maximize the return from available funding for street pavement.
Pavement is a dynamic structure where deteriorati on is constantly occurring. Therefore, as part of the development of the PMP, a survey of the City street pavement condition must be conducted on a regular basis to identify the type of severity and quantity of pavement distresses (refer to Section 2.0 Methodology and Appendix D: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan ). The pavement management database needs to be updated frequently to reflect the changes in pavement conditions and pavement maintenance histories. Upon completion of the survey and database updates, StreetSaver generates a new PCI value, which assists in the selection of the most cost-effective roadway M&R strategy. The PCI value, which was developed by US Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory and adopted as standard procedure by the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, has been utilized by numerous municipalities nationwide.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
15 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 2-2-1
2.0 METHODOLOGY
2.1 INVENTORY
All streets within the City are categorized as either arterial or local streets and are grouped as such into their respective networks ; collectively they comprise the entire pavement network .
Within each network, the streets are ranked based on their functional classifications (refer to Section 3.0 Pavement Network) and are assigned a letter that corresponds with the rank. In the case of the arterial network, the letter ‘B’ is assigned to major arterial streets, the letter ‘P’ is assigned to primary arterial streets, the letter ‘S’ is assigned to secondary arterial streets, and the letter ‘C’ is assigned to collector arterial streets . In the case of the local network, the letter s ‘E’ and ‘I’ are assigned to residential and non-residential streets, respectively.
Each street, or branch, is divided into segments, or sections, at intersecting streets and railroads.
For example, Main Street from First Street to Second Street and Grand Avenue from Railroad to Chestnut Avenue. Additionally, a section break is introduced where a change in pavement surface is encountered mid -block. For example, if the pavement surface were to change from Asphalt Concrete (AC) to Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) at any point along Main Street from First Street to Second Street, then the resulting sections would be Main Street from First Street to AC- PCC Transition and Main Street from AC -PCC Transition to Second Street; where one section has an AC surface and the other has a PCC surface.
In an effort to help identify and sort the streets efficiently, identifying numbers are assigned to each branch and section. A Branch ID is a six-digit number assigned to each branch and is numbered increasingly with numbered streets listed first followed by the remainder of the streets listed in alphabetical order. A Section ID is a four-digit number assigned to each section and is numbered increasingly based on geography from west to east and from south to north. For example, the westernmost or southernmost section of a branch would have a Section ID with the lowest number and the easternmost or northernmost section of a branch would have a Section ID with the highest number. Furthermore, the four -digit Section ID number may be followed by a letter such as N, S, E, or W that denotes the direction of travel (north, south, east, and west, respectively) along a street. This letter is used to differentiate between the two halves of a street when it is divided as such. For example, Section ID 1100N and Section ID 1100S would denote the northbound and southbound sides of a section, respectively.
Additionally, other sort features are available to assist in further grouping segments with similar characteristics. For example, to identify street s within pre -defined geographical areas, each section is labeled with a number that corresponds to either a neighborhood or a non-neighborhood area. A neighborhood area, which is typically comprised of churches, schools, and residential properties, is defined as the boundary established through a collaboration of the City’s Community Development Agency (CDA) and local residents based on both geographic and social components. Currently, there are 64 neighborhoods established in the City, which meet with CDA staff regularly to develop strategies to shape it for the better and sustain it for the long term . A non-neighborhood area refers to the zone located outside of the established neighborhood boundaries comprising of mostly commercial and industrial uses.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
16 6/2/2026
2.0 Methodology
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 2-2-2
2.2 PLANNING
Preparation prior to performing pavement surveys involves three major components: inspector training, survey type selection, and identifying sample units. • Inspector Training - In order to be familiar with the inspection guidelines, inspectors are prompted to read the StreetSaver Asphalt & Concrete Distress Manuals, complete the web-based Pavement Management software training and learn the data input application for the StreetSaver program prior to inspecting. Additionally, the inspection route s are planned in a time-efficient manner to efficiently capture the pavement data. • Survey Types - There are two types of surveys allowable : “windshield” and “walking” surveys. A windshield survey consists of examining the pavement from a vehicle moving at no more than 10 miles per hour (MPH), while a walking survey allows an inspector to examine from the pavement surface itself. Although, for safety reasons, walking surveys on arterial roadways may be performed from a safe place adjacent to the pavement such as a sidewalk, center median, or shoulder.
• Sample Unit s - Random areas, known as sample units, within a street section are inspected as a representative of the whole segment. A sample unit for an asphalt street section contains a total area of 2500 square feet (SF) ±1000 SF, and a sample unit for a PCC street section contains a total number of 20 slabs ±8 slabs.
2.3 DATA COLLECTION
The pavement distresses found within a sample unit are identified by type, classified by severity, measured/counted, and recorded as they are encountered in the field. A number of sample units are randomly selected for re-inspection to assure consis tent and accurate results among inspectors.
Refer to Appendix D: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan for further details on quality control/quality assurance.
2.4 DATA ENTRY
The collected pavement distress data is input into StreetSaver, creating an inspection record for each sample unit.
2.5 ANALYSIS
Based on the latest inspection data and several other factors, including surface type, functional classifications, last construction date, and PCI, pavement deterioration curves (PDCs) or pavement condition prediction models are generated separately for th e local and arterial networks. These curves are imperative for a complete PMP to predict future pavement performance and determine maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) requirements. Figure 2 -1 shows a sample PDC with the appropriate M&R.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
17 6/2/2026
2.0 Methodology
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 2-2-3 Figure 2-1: Sample Pavement Deterioration Curve
To develop an accurate PDC, “suspicious” data / anomalies outside of the maximum and minimum envelopes generated from StreetSaver are filtered out. For example, data with PCI increase significantly with age (recording error) or lack of past inspection data must be removed because pavements are load carrying structures, which degrade over time due to the combined action of environmental and traffic. This data filtering processing is critical because pavements with unusual performance would have substantial impact on the PDC behavior and the pavement life cycle consequently.
The final PDCs illustrate that the rate of deterioration is fairly slow in the early years of the pavement’s design life. During the first 65 percent to 75 percent of a pavement’s design life, which varies based on functional classifications and surface type, a pavement deteriorates approximately 40 percent of its quality, i.e. from a PCI of 100 (“Very Good” condition) to a PCI of 60 (“Fair” condition). However, the rate of deterioration starts to increase rapidly with age after a pavement reaches this point in its life cycle. Typically, a pavement can deteriorate 40 percent in its quality (PCI quickly drops from 60 (“Fair” condition) to 20 (“Very Poor” condition)) in the next 15 percent to 25 percent of its design life. Although the local and arterial networks have different design life spans, both PDCs share similar characteristics because the pavement will crack and these cracks will propagate out and become severe with continued traffic loadings and weathering without any M&R treatment. Therefore, a PCI of 60 is assigned as the critical PCI for both the arterial and local networks. The critical PCI is defined as the PCI value after which a pavement section is expected to deteriorate rapidly with age or where the rate of PCI loss increases significantly with time.
85 Very Good
75 Good
Fair
Poor
Very Poor
Do Nothing
Surface Seal
60 Overlay
Resurfacing
40 Reconstruction
0 100Pavement Condition (PCI)
Pavement Life (yrs)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
18 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-1
3.0 PAVEMENT NETWORK
Currently, the City ’s entire street pavement network has approximately 454 miles consisting of approximately 93.4 million square feet of paved surfaces. To assist planning maintenance needs, the entire pavement network is organized into two networks (arterial and local) depending on their importance in the whole roadway system. The arterial and local networks include 129.3 miles (28 percent) and 324.6 miles (72 percent), respectively. To be consistent with the City General Plan Circulation Element Master Plan of Streets and Highways and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH), the streets in each network are ranked based on their functional classes; the arterial network is comprised of Major, Primary , Secondary arterial streets and Collector Streets, and the local network is comprised of Residential and Non-Residential streets. Additionally, these streets are classified by surface types—Asphalt Concrete (AC) or Portland Cement Concrete (PCC); and they are divided into 4,174 sections (refer to section 2.0 Methodology) for ease of trac king their pavement conditions, pavement history and M&R requirements. Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1 summarize the current City pavement networks information.
Table 3-1: Entire Pavement Network Summary
Figure 3-1: Entire Pavement Network Summary
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
19 6/2/2026
3.0 Pavement Network
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-2
3.1 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS
One of the critical factors affecting the roadbeds and pavement deterioration rate is the quantity and associated vehicle weight of traffic utilizing the streets. The volume and type of vehicular usage for the abovementioned arterial network’s four functional classifications are:
• Major Arterial – Generally consists of a six -travel lane, divided roadway connecting various parts within the City of Santa Ana and adjacent cities. A major arterial is designed to accommodate between 30,000 and 50,600 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 58 centerline miles or 55.2 percent of City arterial network. • Primary Arterial – Generally consists of a four-lane, divided roadway serving as a major access route to regional destinations (such as downtown and similar major focal points within the City). A primary arterial is designed to accommodate between 20,000 and 30,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 9 centerline miles or
8.6 percent of City arterial network.
• Secondary Arterial – Generally consists of a four-lane, undivided roadway serving intra- city mobility. A secondary arterial is designed to accommodate between 10,000 and 20,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 35 centerline miles or 33.3 percent of City arterial network.
• Collector Street – Generally consists of a two-lane, undivided roadway. A collector street is designed to accommodate between 7,500 and 10,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 3 centerline miles or 2.9 percent of City arterial network.
Figure 3-2: Arterial Street
The local network is comprised of two functional classifications as described below:
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
20 6/2/2026
3.0 Pavement Network
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-3 • Non-Residential Street – Generally a low -speed two -lane, undivided roadw ay with parking allowed on both sides of the street. Businesses are located on both sides of the street. A non-residential street is designed to accommodate less than 6,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 32 centerline miles or 10 percent of City local network.
• Residential Street – Generally a low-speed and low-volume two-lane, undivided roadway providing access to individual properties in a neighborhood. A residential street is designed to accommodate less than 6,000 vehicle trips daily. This facility type comprises approximately 285 centerline miles or 90 percent of City local network.
Figure 3-3: Local Street
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
21 6/2/2026
3.0 Pavement Network
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-4
3.2 PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX
The City utilizes PCI output from StreetSaver as the rating mechanism to describe the City street pavement condition. This numerical index ranges from PCI of “0” for a failed and/or badly deteriorated pavement with virtually no remaining life to PCI of “10 0” for a pavement in perfect condition. A street section with proper engineer ing design and construction begins its life cycle as a new or recently rehabilitated street with a PCI of “100”. As the condition of the street surface begins to deteriorate, th e PCI decrease reflects the surface deterioration based on the signs of distress noted during the field surveys (refer to Section 2.0 Methodology and Appendix D: Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan). Although the surface treatment recommendation for each street section utilizes the PCI value as the basis, the PCI values shall be used for planning purposes only and are not intended to replace sound engineering judgment. An engineering review of the pavement condition shall take pla ce prior to any actual construction work at a particular street section because the review may indicate that a particular pavement section needs attention earlier than the other street sections in its localized area.
In general for planning and budgeting purposes, the correlation among the PCI, pavement quality and signs of distresses are summarized in Table 3-2:
Table 3-2: Pavement Condition Index and Treatment Type
Pavement
Quality PCI Pavement Description
Very Good 86-100
The pavement is new or almost new with very little or no roughness and surface distress (except utility patches if any), including minimal hairline cracks and/or weathering. The pavement structure is sound and no oxidation occurs.
Good 75-85
The pavement has minor roughness and little to slight surface distresses (except utility patches if any), including slight cracking, slight to moderate weathering. The pavement structure is sound and no oxidation occurs.
Fair 60-74
The pavement may have noticeable roughness and slight to moderate distresses are surfacing, including severe weathering, non-load-related cracking, depressions, and material loss. The pavement structure is becoming deficient (minimal base failure).
Poor 41-59
The pavement has noticeable roughness (significant surface distortion) and moderate to severe surface distresses, including severe weathering, load-related cracking (such as alligator cracking), depressions, material loss. The pavement structure is deficient (up to one-third base failure).
Very Poor 0-40
The pavement has severe surface distresses, including large quantities of distortion and major and unsafe cracking (alligator cracking). The pavement structure is inadequate (over one-third failure).
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
22 6/2/2026
3.0 Pavement Network
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-5
3.3 EXISTING PAVEMENT CONDITION
Based on the inspections and data processing procedures mentioned in Section 2.0 Methodology, the majority of the local street’s pavements (39 percent) currently have a PCI of at least 86 or in “Very Good” condition; this indicates that the City’s local network continues to demonstrate high conditional values. The arterial network shows a slight improvement from 2024. Furthermore, these results show a sustainment in the entire network PCI since the City’s 2022 update (refer to Table 3-3 for PCI distribution in 2022, 2024 compared to 2026).
Table 3-3: PCI Distribution Comparison (2022, 2024 vs. 2026)
With the proper maintenance and rehabilitation application of the local and arterial streets, the majority of the entire pavement network is currently in “Very Good” condition (36 percent) with a PCI of at least 86, which is similar to the results from the previous update in 2024. Figure 3-4 summarizes the current PCI distribution for the entire pavement network.
Figure 3-4: Current PCI Distribution (Entire Pavement Network)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
23 6/2/2026
3.0 Pavement Network
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-6 As shown in Table 3-3, the majority of arterial streets’ pavements are currently either in “Fair” (32.4 percent), “Good” ( 15.0 percent), or “Very Good” ( 28.2 percent) conditions. These results, which show a condition stabilization (no significant increase or decrease) in the top three condition categories of “Fair”, “Good”, and “Very Good” from 2024 to the current year ( 76 percent for all three categories), indicate that the City has been performing proper and timely maintenance and rehabilitation strategies for the arterial streets to maintain the percentage of streets in the top three condition categories (refer to Table 3-3 for the comparison). The sustaining in arterial street pavement conditions can be attributed to local funding and various funding sources from Orange County Transportation Authority, County of Orange, State of California, and other various agencies that the City has received in past years. Figure 3-5 shows the current PCI distribution of the arterial network.
Figure 3-5: Current PCI Distribution (Arterial Network)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
24 6/2/2026
3.0 Pavement Network
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-7 The sustainment in the condition of the local pavement network in recent years resulted largely from the annual Local Street Preventative Maintenance Program, which commenced in 2014.
Figure 3-6 shows the current PCI distribution of the local network.
Figure 3-6: Current PCI Distribution (Local Network)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
25 6/2/2026
3.0 Pavement Network
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 3-3-8 Table 3-4 shows the breakdown of PCI distribution of the entire pavement network, and the arterial and local pavement networks individually, based on area and section mileage.
Table 3-4: PCI Distribution
The pavement condition is generally measured by a weighted index ( typically by area), referred to as Average Area-Weighted Pavement Condition Index (PCIaw), which is determined as follows:
Where,
PCIaw = Average area-weighted PCI
PCIi = PCI of pavement section number i
Ai = Area of section number i
n = Total number of pavement sections
Based on the formula above, t he City’s current entire pavement network is in “Good” condition with a PCIaw of 75.2.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
26 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-1
4.0 MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION STRATEGIES
With 454 miles and 4,170 street sections, the City develops a comprehensive, fully -integrated PMP utilizing the inventory data along with the inspection information, M&R options and their associated costs, and predictions about future pavement condition from StreetSaver to determine optimal time for maintenance and rehabilitation needs. Due to limited available fiscal resources, the City needs to perform cost -effective M&R strategies to maintain the pavement networks.
Additionally, pavement preservation, which is an important as pect of the PMP considering the limited funding, will be included in the overall decision-making process.
4.1 TREATMENT TYPES AND ASSOCIATED COSTS
The pavement preservation and M&R considerations utilized by the City are categorized into localized, global an d major M&R. Localized M&R can be applied as a stop -gap measure or a preventive measure, including routine maintenance such as crack -filling and pothole repairs.
Global M&R, which is cost effective when applied as a preventive measure, are methods applied to the entire pavement sections to slow the rate of deterioration and improve current PCI, including applying slurry seal to the existing pavement surface. Major M&R, which is often economically applicable to deteriorated pavements, pavements deteriorat ing at a rapid rate, and pavements subjected to a change in traffic loading, refer to methods correcting or improving structural and functional requirements, including cold -milling and overlay, cold -in-place recycling, cement treated base, and/or full dept h reconstruction. The City currently utilizes the following M&R treatment methods:
• Crack Seal – Crack Seal is applicable for newer pavements with cracks beginning to form.
Since water is the most destructive element to a roadway pavement, this treatment utilizes asphalt materials bonding to the crack walls to restrict water penetration into the underlying base and sub -base layers to reduce further pavement deterioration. This preventive M&R treatment, which will extend the pavement life by three to five y ears, saves money by delaying the expense of major reconstructive pavement work. • Slurry Seal – Slurry Seal, which applies to pavement with minimal surface distress, such as minor/low severity cracks, provides a new wearing surface to extend the pavement life.
This treatment is a mix blend of high-quality crushed aggregates (sand -like), asphalt emulsion, water and mineral fillers, spreading over the entire pavement surface. The layer of slurry seal (ranging from 1/8” to 3/8” thick) prevents further oxidization and water from further deteriorating the asphalt concrete surface and subgrade, corrects raveling, and improves skid resistance.
• Thin Overlay – Thin Overlay is a maintenance overlay appl icable to pavement with moderate cracking where preventive M&R is no longer effective. This treatment involves partially milling or grinding the edge of shoulder (typically 6 feet), sealing the cracks to retard reflective cracking, and placing a thin layer of hot-mixed asphalt concrete (up to two inches for streets in both arterial and local networks) over the existing pavement surface. The thin layer of AC improves the skid resistance and roadway’s performance, and corrects the crown and drainage features.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
27 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-2 • Structural Overlay – Structural Overlays, which applies to moderate to severe pavement cracking with little or no deficiency in the foundation layers, entails cold -milling / grinding the surface to a depth of up to three inches for arterial streets and two inches for local streets, removing localized failed areas, and placing a thick layer of hot -mixed AC (typically four to five inches for arterial streets and three to four inches for local streets).
The new AC pavement section smooth the ride performan ce, improves skid resistance, correct the crown and drainage features, increases pavement structural capacity. • Cold-In-Place Recycling (CIR) – CIR, which applies to moderate to severe pavement cracking with little or no deficiency in the pavement structure , is a process rehabilitating pavement by recycling it in place. The top layer of pavement is removed with a milling (grinding) machine to a specified depth (typically three to f our inches). The removed material is then crushed, sorted and mixed with a s pecially formulated asphalt emulsion.
This emulsion mixes with the milled pavement and acts as a binder to form the new CIR pavement. This new mixture is placed on the roadway by a paver and compacted as a new and more durable asphalt base course. Finally, a thin overlay of conventional asphalt pavement is placed over the CIR to seal it and provide a new wear to improve ride performance and drainage features and increase pavement structural capacity. • Cement-Treated Base (CTB) – CTB is applicable when the distress evidence at the surface indicates failure in the pavement structure or subgrade (the roadway completely failed with crumbling surface pavement), which is not correctable by less extensive construction. Due to its long curing time, this treatment method typically should be applied to low-moderate traffic areas and/or moderate traffic areas with more than one lane per direction with a low volume of large vehicles. CTB involves grinding the existing roadway surface and base into pieces to a prescri bed depth (typically 14 to 20 inches for arterial streets and 8 to 11 inches for local streets), which are mixed with cement and water to be used as a base course. A thin overlay of conventional asphalt pavement is then placed over the CTB base to provide a new wear for improving ride performance and drainage features and increase pavement structural capacity.
• Full Depth Reconstruction (FDR) – FDR is applicable when the distress evidence at the surface indicates failure in the pavement structure or subgrad e (the roadway completely failed with crumbling surface pavement), which is not correctable by less extensive construction. This treatment involves removal of existing layers of asphalt AC, PCC, and/or base to a prescribed depth recommended by geotechnica l engineering pavement analysis and placement of conventional flexible pavement section. In general, local residential and non -residential streets are removed to depths of six inches and eight inches, respectively; a depth of 10 inches are removed on secondary arterial and collector streets; a depth of 12 inches are removed on primary arterial streets; and a depth of 16 inches are removed on major arterial streets. The actual depth depends on anticipated traffic loading, soil conditions, and roadway functional classifications. This treatment is by far the most expensive form of M&R strategies to increase pavement structural capacity.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
28 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-3 Table 4-1: Cost by Condition (Arterial Network)
Condition
(PCI)
Functional
Classification Surface Cost
($/SF)
75 - 85
Secondary / Collector
Primary
Major
AC $3.19
60 - 74 Secondary / Collector AC $6.91
41 - 59
Secondary / Collector AC $13.29
Primary AC $14.82
Major AC $16.34
41-59 Secondary / Collector PCC $28.62
0 - 40
Secondary / Collector AC $45.64
Primary AC $54.58
Major AC $72.42
Secondary / Collector PCC $28.62
Table 4-2: Cost by Condition (Local Network)
Condition
(PCI)
Functional
Classification Surface Cost ($/SF)
75 - 85 Residential
Non-Residential AC $2.09
60 - 74 Residential
Non-Residential AC $5.18
41 - 59
Residential AC $10.06
Non-Residential AC $25.73
0 - 40
Residential AC $23.60
Non-Residential AC $23.60
Residential/Non-Res PCC $25.73
Residential
Non-Residential PCC $25.73
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
29 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-4 It is imperative for the City to receive the proper amount and type of funding to perform the M&R strategies as a plan to preserve the roadway pavement system in good condition. The plan is to apply a slurry seal coat to new or recently rehabilitated streets at regular intervals, usually seven to ten years. After a couple slurry seal coats, maintenance (thin) overlay or structural overlay shall be utilized to address structural issues. Every street will fail event ually or reach a point where it is more cost-effective to reconstruct than to repair. The roadway functional classification (refer to Section 3.0 Pavement Network) and the original design life of a particular street sectio n will determine the intervals and treatment types. Additionally, streets with higher speeds, traffic volumes, and/or loads, will demand a larger pavement section.
To account for the differences in pavement section across the spectrum of streets within the entire pavement network, the streets are grouped into M&R families according to their functional classification and/or surface type and a cost by condition is applied. The cost by condition for the arterial and local networks is shown in Table 4-1 and Table 4-2, respectively. These unit costs per SF include the soft costs of design, inspection, and construction engineering and are compiled utilizing current projects as a basis for costs.
As the pavement age s, the PMP is designed to predict the roadway pavement’s PCI based on the deterioration curves (refer to Section 2.0 Methodology). Additionally, the PMP, which is a tool to assist the City in m aking decisions when planning pavement M&R , involves scheduling pavement maintenance and rehabilitation before pavements deteriorate to a condition where reconstruction is the only solution. Based on Figure 2-1 in Section 2.0 Methodology showing how pavement generally deteriorates and the relative M&R cost (refer to Table 4-1 and Table 4-2) at various times throughout the pavement life, the critical PCI is est ablished at 60. The critical PCI is defined as the PCI value after which the pavement section is expected to deteriorate rapidly with age, or the rate of PCI loss increases significantly with time, and the unit cost of repair greatly increases; therefore, the threshold for M&R decisions are considered at the critical PCI value since the cost of maintaining the pavement above the critical PCI value before the deterioration occurs is much less compared to maintaining pavements after substantial deterioration has occurred. Planned M&R strategies, essentially preventing pavements from reaching deteriorated conditions, helps the City stretch and maximize the use of City budgets and prolong the life of the pavements. StreetSaver utilizes the inventory database combined with the inspection information, M&R options along with their associated costs, and the deterioration curves predicting future pavement condition to calculate the chosen budget activity to reflect the best pavement management practices and costs.
The City’s PMP goal is to maintain a pavement system network with an optimal PCI of 75 (“Good” Condition) or better . The City’s pavement system currently has 63 percent of the pavement sections in “Good” or “Very Good” condition (refer to Section 3.0 Pavement Network). The PMP will recommend priority list of maintenance treatments annually to bring all City streets to at least “Good” condition. The preventive M&R treatments, which are inexpensive treatments to extend pavement life cycle, have minimal costs since they are applied prior to pavement deterioration to “Poor” and “Very Poor” conditions.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
30 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-5
4.2 FUNDING
The City has estimated total funding amounts of $71.2 million and $43.6 million for the pavement expenditures of the arterial and local networks, respectively, for the next seven years (refer to City CIP on a separate document for further details). Generally, the future revenues for City street preventive and major M&R programs are from the following funding sources:
• Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) – The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 returns income tax funds to cities and counties to develop viable urban communities, primarily for the benefit of low and moderate income people. This U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development program gives priority to activities that help to eliminate blight, with emphasis on residential areas. CDBG projects are carried out by several operating departments with the City and by sub -agents. Public hearings are held to plan projects for each fiscal fear. The selected projects are recommended by citizens, commissioners, and staff.
• Gas Tax – Gas Tax funds are derived from the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax (or Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)). Motorists pay a tax for fuel consumption. It is apportioned to cities according to population and can only be utilized in the maintenance and construction of the street system.
• Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA – Streets and Highways Code Sec 2030 et sec.) includes funds from the following taxes enacted by Senate Bill 1 Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017: the 12 cent gasoline excise tax, 20 cent diesel fuel excise tax, transportation improvement fees. These new gas tax funding sou rces contribute funding on an annual basis.
• Local Street Bond Fund – In 2007, the City issued a $60 million bond as a certificate of participation (COP) against Gas Tax revenue to create the Residential Street Repair Program to repair and rehabilitate neighborhood streets Citywide. • Measure M2 – On November 7, 2006, voters approved the renewal of the Measure M half-cent sales tax (Measure M2), extending the program over a 30-year period beginning in 2011. In addition to the original three program components, this generation of the Measure M Transportation Plan expands the program to include Environmental Cleanup and Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits. To receive revenues from the one -half-cent sales tax, cities and the County of Orange must coordinate their land use and transportation decisions, establish cooperative transportation planning programs with neighboring jurisdictions, develop Growth Management programs, and guarantee that transportation funds are used for transportation purposes only.
• Measure M2 – Competitive – The competitive portion of the Measure M2 consists of the following programs: Regional Capacity Program (RCP), Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP), and several transit programs. • Measure M2 – Fairshare – This local fair share program returns a portion of the Measure M2 Streets and Roads revenues to the cities and the County of Orange once specific program requirements are met. Disbursement amounts are based on a formula that accounts for population, street mileage, and sales tax collected.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
31 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-6 • Refuse Collection – Funds received in the course of business for the public collection and disposal of refuse. The City adopted a Vehicle Impact Fee program to provide funding for necessary improvements to the City’s streets to offset the wear and tear impact of heavy vehicle travel.
4.3 BUDGET ALTERNATIVES
Having determined the needs of the City local and arterial networks and the City fiscal-year budget for the next seven years, the City utilizes StreetSaver to evaluate impacts of various bu dget alternatives – existing budget in City CIP, budget to maintain the current PCIaw over a seven year plan, and budget to improve the current PCI aw by one point or better over a seven -year plan.
StreetSaver has the capability of forecasting the effects of different budget alternatives on PCI and deferred maintenance (backlog). By examining the effects of these indicators, these “what - if” analyses clearly identify the advantages and disadvantages of different funding levels and preventive and major M&R strategies.
The following guide is provided for interpreting the individual output in Budget Analysis tables below.
• PCI w/o Existing Funding – PCI yielded as a result of no preventive or major M&R work during the listed fiscal year. This value is provided for comparison purposes and is intended to be used as the baseline PCI.
• PCI w/ Existing Funding – PCI yielded as a result of preventive and major M&R work with existing funding during the listed fiscal year.
• PCI w/ Alternative Funding – PCI yielded as a result of preventive and major M&R work with existing plus additional funding during the listed fiscal year. • Preventive M&R Existing Funding – Existing funding for preventive M&R work during the listed fiscal year.
• Major M&R Existing Funding – Existing funding for major M&R work during the listed fiscal year.
• Major M&R Additional Funding – Additional funding for major M&R work required to reach the listed goal during the listed fiscal year.
• Total Existing Funding – Sum of existing funding during the listed fiscal year. • Total Alternative Funding – Sum of existing funding plus additional funding required to reach the listed goal during the listed fiscal year.
• Backlog – Total estimated M&R work left unfunded during the listed fiscal year.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
32 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-7
4.3.1 EXISTING FUNDING
This alternative represents the impacts of the City’s current CIP budget on the entire pavement network, and the arterial and local pavement networks independently, for the next seven years.
Currently, there are approximately $71.2 million and $43.6 million for the pavement expenditures in the arterial and local networks, respectively, for the next seven years. The City’s main objective is keeping street sections from falling into the reconstruction category (“Very Poor” condition), at which point typically cost s three to four times more per SF than resurfacing. Therefore, the selection of streets for M&R treatments during each fiscal year involves StreetSaver output, engineering judgment and experience, and available budget.
With a limited existing budget over the next seven years from FY 2026/27 to FY 2032/33, the entire pavement network PCI will decrease from the “Good” condition to “Fair” (PCIaw of 75.2.3 to a PCI aw of 69). Not only does the pavement condition deteriorate, but the entire pavement network’s backlog will increase by 83 percent by FY 2032/33 as shown in Table 4 -3. This information indicates that the City is facing the challenge of securing adequate, sustainable funding for the M&R program to keep up with the increasing rate of deteriorating streets.
The arterial and local networks, independently, will reduce the citywide PCIaw by at least six points over next seven FYs and the local network will drop to a “Fair” condition while the arterial network will remain in “Fair” condition . Additionally, the current level of funding is insufficient to stabilize the backlog since the unfunded deferred M&R projects will increase by 52 percent for the arterial network, increase by 31 percent for the local network by FY 2032/33 and 83% for the entire network.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
33 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-8 Table 4-3: Existing Funding (Entire Pavement Network)
Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Existing
Funding
Preventive M&R
Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Total
Existing
Funding Backlog
Present 75 75 ~ ~ ~ $325,579
2026/27 74 75 $6,049 $11,303 $17,353 $354,835
2027/28 72 74 $8,425 $6,914 $15,339 $381,416
2028/29 70 73 $4,365 $10,085 $14,450 $438,586
2029/30 68 72 $7,008 $9,573 $16,580 $481,819
2030/31 67 71 $8,289 $8,718 $17,007 $519,020
2031/32 65 70 $6,848 $9,697 $16,544 $558,333
2032/33 63 69 $6,553 $10,337 $16,890 $595,574
TOTAL $47,536 $66,627 $114,163
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
Table 4-4: Existing Funding (Arterial Network)
Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Existing
Funding
Preventive M&R
Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Total
Existing
Funding Backlog
Present 72 72 ~ ~ ~ ~
2026/27 71 73 $0 $8,242 $8,242 $145,482
2027/28 69 75 $0 $4,774 $4,774 $156,380
2028/29 67 75 $0 $4,381 $4,381 $179,820
2029/30 66 76 $0 $7,918 $7,918 $197,546
2030/31 64 75 $0 $2,805 $2,805 $212,798
2031/32 62 75 $0 $8,177 $8,177 $228,917
2032/33 61 75 $0 $8,069 $8,069 $244,186
TOTAL $0 $44,365 $44,365
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
34 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-9 Table 4-5: Existing Funding (Local Network)
Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Existing
Funding
Preventive M&R
Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Total
Existing
Funding Backlog
Present 77 77 ~ ~ ~ ~
2026/27 76 77 $6,049 $3,062 $9,111 $209,352
2027/28 74 76 $8,425 $2,140 $10,565 $225,035
2028/29 73 75 $4,365 $5,704 $10,069 $258,765
2029/30 71 73 $7,008 $1,654 $8,662 $284,273
2030/31 69 72 $8,289 $5,913 $14,202 $306,222
2031/32 67 71 $6,848 $1,520 $8,368 $329,417
2032/33 65 71 $6,553 $2,269 $8,822 $351,389
TOTAL $47,536 $22,262 $69,798
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
35 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-10
4.3.2 ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN EXISTING PCI With existing funding of just under $115 million for the entire pavement network over the seven - year period from FY 2026/27 through FY 2032/33, additional funding is required to maintain the existing PCI aw of 75.2. This alternative provides an available prioritized list of streets with recommended M&R treatment to allow the City to hand select if unforeseen funds become available at some point in the future. As illustrated in Table 4-6, a total of $36.3 million in additional funds calculated at about $5.1 million annually would be needed; thus, providing for a total alternative funding level of just over $150.5 million over the seven-year period. Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for FY 2026/27 of $325.6 million would be increased by about 42 percent to $462.8 million for FY 2032/33.
Demonstrated in Table 4-7 and Table 4-8, 62 percent ($22.5 million) of the additional funding ($36.3 million) would be applied to the arterial network and 38 percent ($13.8 million) would be applied to the local network. As a result, the existing PCIaw would be maintained at 75; 72 and 79 for the arterial and local networks, respectively.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
36 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-11 Table 4-6: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Entire Pavement Network) Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Alternative
Funding
Preventive
M&R Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Additional
Funding
Total
Alternative
Funding Backlog
Present 75 76 ~ ~ ~ ~ $325,579
2026/27 74 76 $6,477 $14,414 $3,538 $20,891 $336,516
2027/28 72 76 $5,728 $14,551 $4,907 $20,279 $356,411
2028/29 70 75 $6,835 $17,169 $9,554 $24,004 $360,646
2029/30 68 75 $5,313 $16,362 $5,095 $21,675 $386,699
2030/31 67 75 $4,832 $15,097 $2,922 $19,929 $404,645
2031/32 65 75 $5,948 $16,032 $5,436 $21,980 $444,408
2032/33 63 75 $6,294 $15,422 $4,826 $21,716 $462,794
TOTAL $41,427 $109,047 $36,311 $150,475
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
Table 4-7: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Arterial Network) Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Alternative
Funding
Preventive
M&R Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Additional
Funding
Total
Alternative
Funding Backlog
Present 72 72 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2026/27 71 73 $0 $8,937 $1,928 $8,937 $137,971
2027/28 69 72 $0 $9,022 $3,551 $9,022 $146,128
2028/29 67 72 $0 $10,645 $4,383 $10,645 $147,865
2029/30 66 71 $0 $9,909 $4,042 $9,909 $158,546
2030/31 64 71 $0 $9,125 $2,389 $9,125 $165,905
2031/32 62 72 $0 $9,704 $3,043 $9,704 $182,208
2032/33 61 72 $0 $10,268 $3,176 $10,268 $189,745
TOTAL $0 $67,610 $22,512 $67,610
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
37 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-12 Table 4-8: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Maintain Existing PCI (Local Network)
Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Alternative
Funding
Preventive
M&R Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Additional
Funding
Total
Alternative
Funding Backlog
Present 77 78 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2026/27 76 78 $6,477 $5,477 $1,182 $11,954 $198,544
2027/28 74 78 $5,728 $5,529 $2,176 $11,257 $210,282
2028/29 73 78 $6,835 $6,524 $2,686 $13,359 $212,781
2029/30 71 79 $5,313 $6,453 $2,477 $11,766 $228,152
2030/31 69 79 $4,832 $5,972 $1,465 $10,804 $238,741
2031/32 67 78 $5,948 $6,328 $1,865 $12,276 $262,201
2032/33 65 79 $6,294 $5,154 $1,946 $11,448 $273,048
TOTAL $41,427 $41,437 $13,797 $82,864
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
38 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-13
4.3.3 ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS REQUIRED TO IMPROVE PCI With existing funding of just under $115 million for the entire pavement network over the seven - year period from FY 2026/27 through FY 2032/33, additional funding is required to improve the existing PCIaw for FY 2026/27 of 75.2 by one point or better. As illustrated in Table 4-9, a total of $46.0 million in additional funds calculated at about $6.6 million annually would be needed; thus providing for a total alternative funding level of over $160.2 million over the seven -year period.
Furthermore, with this additional funding, the backlog for FY 2026/27 of $325.6 million would increase about 21 percent to $393.4 million for FY 2032/33.
Demonstrated in Table 4-10 and Table 4-11, 62 percent ($28.5 million) of the additional funding ($46.0 million) would be applied to the arterial network and 38 percent ($17.5 million) would be applied to the local network. As a result, the existing PCIaw would be improved to 75.0 and 78.0 for the arterial and local networks, respectively.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
39 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-14 Table 4-9: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Entire Pavement Network) Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Alternative
Funding
Preventive
M&R Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Additional
Funding
Total
Alternative
Funding Backlog
Present 75 76 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2026/27 74 76 $6,892 $15,029 $4,568 $21,921 $336,516
2027/28 72 78 $7,670 $15,428 $7,759 $23,098 $346,662
2028/29 70 78 $7,290 $17,145 $9,985 $24,435 $327,115
2029/30 68 79 $7,483 $16,874 $7,777 $24,357 $356,777
2030/31 67 78 $5,055 $15,663 $3,711 $20,718 $336,661
2031/32 65 78 $8,029 $15,874 $7,359 $23,903 $315,265
2032/33 63 78 $6,233 $15,517 $4,860 $21,750 $393,441
TOTAL $48,652 $111,530 $46,019 $160,182
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
Table 4-10: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Arterial Network) Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Alternative
Funding
Preventive
M&R Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Additional
Funding
Total
Alternative
Funding Backlog
Present 72 72 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2026/27 71 73 $0 $9,231 $2,832 $9,231 $137,971
2027/28 69 75 $1,565 $9,584 $4,811 $11,149 $142,132
2028/29 67 75 $0 $10,334 $6,191 $10,334 $134,117
2029/30 66 76 $1,781 $9,950 $4,822 $11,731 $146,279
2030/31 64 75 $0 $9,212 $2,301 $9,212 $138,031
2031/32 62 75 $1,924 $9,250 $4,563 $11,174 $129,258
2032/33 61 75 $0 $10,052 $3,013 $10,052 $161,311
TOTAL $2,476 $67,613 $28,532 $72,883
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
40 6/2/2026
4.0 Maintenance And Rehabilitation Strategies
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program 4-4-15 Table 4-11: Alternative Funding Levels Required To Improve PCI (Local Network) Fiscal
Year
PCIaw w/o
Existing
Funding
PCIaw w/
Alternative
Funding
Preventive
M&R Existing
Funding
Major M&R
Existing
Funding
Additional
Funding
Total
Alternative
Funding Backlog
Present 77 77 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2026/27 76 78 $6,892 $5,798 $1,736 $12,690 $198,544
2027/28 74 79 $6,105 $5,844 $2,948 $11,949 $204,531
2028/29 73 79 $7,290 $6,811 $3,794 $14,101 $192,998
2029/30 71 80 $5,702 $6,924 $2,955 $12,626 $210,498
2030/31 69 81 $5,055 $6,451 $1,410 $11,506 $198,630
2031/32 67 81 $6,105 $6,624 $2,796 $12,729 $186,006
2032/33 65 82 $6,233 $5,465 $1,847 $11,698 $232,130
TOTAL $43,382 $33,504 $17,487 $87,299
Note: Cost figures are rounded to nearest $1,000.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
41 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program
APPENDIX A: ENTIRE PAVEMENT NETWORK PCI REPORT
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
42 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program
APPENDIX B: ARTERIAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
43 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program
APPENDIX C: LOCAL STREETS 7-YEAR M&R PLAN
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
44 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana 2026 Pavement Management Program
APPENDIX D: OCTA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT
COMPLIANCE REPORT – 2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
45 6/2/2026
FINAL REPORT
UPDATED CITYWIDE
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
Measure M2
2026-2033
Submitted to:
City of Santa Ana, CA
March 16, 2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
46 6/2/2026
March 16, 2026
Mr. David Ramirez
CITY OF SANTA ANA
20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Subject: City of Santa Ana – OCTA Pavement Management Compliance Report 2026
Dear David:
As part of the 2026 Update of the Pavement Management Plan (PMP) for the City of Santa Ana, Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. is pleased to submit the PMP reporting required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). This data/report will be submitted to OCTA as part of the City’s required biennial PMP prior to June 30, 2026.
The information contained in this report was used to develop the recommended improvement program for the pavement network. The report covers the following categories:
• Pavement Management Plan Certification
• Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan
• Pavement Management Data Files (Included within the online Santa Ana StreetSaver batch file)
• Pavement Management Plan that includes the following:
• Average Pavement Conditions For Each Segment in the Network (PCI Report) The Pavement Condition Index report shows the present condition of each street in the pavement network (MPAH and Locals). In addition, the report shows the basic geometry of each street segment.
• Seven-year Projected PCI Under Existing Funding Levels This report identifies the projected PCI’s based on the local agencies current funding programs. This report details the PCI projects for the entire network, MPAH roadways and Local streets.
• Seven-year Plan for Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation (Forecasted Maintenance Report)
The Forecasted Maintenance Report projects the street maintenance activities required for the next seven years, broken down to show maintenance levels for all streets. This includes all scheduled projects provided by the City for fiscal years 2026 through 2033.
• Alternative Funding Levels
OCTA has requested two reports indicating the necessary funding to maintain the City’s current weighted average PCI as well as the necessary funding to improve the weighted average PCI by one PCI point over the next seven years.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
47 6/2/2026
• Backlog by Fiscal Year (re: unfunded restoration, rehabilitation and reconstruction)
• Percentage of total network in each of the five condition categories based on centerline mileage
• Local Match Reduction Reporting
❖ In order to be eligible for Local Match Reduction of 10%, the following must be submitted:
o Measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvement of one PCI point.
o No reduction in the ov erall weighted (by area) average PCI in the MPAH or local street categories
- or –
o Have road pavement conditions, for the overall network, during the previous reporting period within the highest twenty (20%) of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in “good condition”.
❖ GIS Digital Data
❖ Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan
❖ Pavement Management Data Files (electronic Costa Mesa.e70 file format)
❖ GIS Maps / Current Conditions
All comments received from the City have been incorporated in the reports that follow. All of the City’s comments and needs that were brought to our attention have been addressed. It has been a pleasure working with you and the City on updating your Pavement Management Plan. We look forward to the continued success of this project and future teamwork with City staff.
Sincerely,
Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Peter J. Bucknam
Project Manager
Infrastructure Management – GIS Services
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
48 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page i
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
AGENCY SUBMITTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification .............................................................................. 2
II. Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. 3
III. Background (City of Santa Ana) ............................................................................................... 4
IV. Current Pavement Conditions (PCI) ......................................................................................... 7
V. Projected Pavement Conditions (PCI) – Current Budget ......................................................... 8
VI. Alternative Funding Levels ....................................................................................................... 9 a. Maintain Existing Average Network PCI ................................................................ 9 b. Improve Average Network PCI ............................................................................... 9
VII. Current and Projected Backlog by Year of Pavement Maintenance Needs ............................ 9
VIII. Centerline Mileage ................................................................................................................. 10
IX. Percentage of Network in Each of Five Condition Categories Based on Centerline mileage 10
X. Reduction in M2 Local Match ................................................................................................ 11
XI. Appendix A – Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Based on Current or Expected Funding Level .............................................................................. 12
XII. Appendix B – Complete Street Listing Current Conditions .................................................... 13
XIII. Appendix C – GIS Digital Data ................................................................................................ 14
XIV. Appendix D – Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan ........................................................ 15 • Introduction ......................................................................................................... 15 • Objectives ............................................................................................................ 15 • Structure of QA/QC Plan ...................................................................................... 15 • Condition Survey Procedures............................................................................... 16 • Accuracy Required for Data Collection ................................................................ 17 • Random and Systematic Re-Inspections .............................................................. 17 • PCI Comparison with Past Surveys ....................................................................... 18 • Inspector Qualifications and Experience ............................................................. 18 i. Attachments – Inspector’s Certifications ................................................. 19 • Safety Procedures ................................................................................................ 20 XV. Appendix E – Pavement Management Data Files ............................................................. 20
XVI. Appendix F – GIS Maps – Current Conditions ................................................................... 21
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
49 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 1
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
- part of -
COUNTYWIDE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN GUIDELINES
(OCTA Guideline – April 2026)
Prepared by: Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc.
Submitted to OCTA: June 30, 2026
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
50 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 2
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
I. Pavement Management Plan Certification
The City of Santa Ana, CA certifies that it has a Pavement Management Plan in conformance with the criteria stated in the Orange County Transportation Authority Ordinance No. 3. This ordinance requires that a Pavement Management Plan be in place and maintained to qualify for allocation of revenues generated from renewed Measure M (M2).
The plan was developed by Bucknam Infrastructure Group, Inc. using StreetSaver, a pavement management system conforming to American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D6433, and contains, at a minimum, the following elements:
• Inventory of MPAH and Local routes reviewed and updated biennially. The last update of the inventory was completed on January, 2026 for the Arterial (MPAH) and January, 2026 for Locals; • Assessment of the pavement condition for al l routes in the system, updated biennially. The last field review of the pavement condition was completed in January, 2026; • Percentage of all section of pavement needing (sourced from Page 7):
o Preventive Maintenance = 28.1%;
o Rehabilitation = 29.4%;
o Reconstruction = 6.4%
• Budget needs for preventive maintenance, rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of deficient sections of pavement for (see Page 9):
o Current biennial period $45,019,600;
o following biennial period $48,792,000;
• Funds budgeted or available for Preventive Maintenance, Rehabilitation and/or Reconstruction (see Page 8):
o Current biennial period $32,800,000;
o following biennial period $32,800,000;
• Backlog by year of unfunded rehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction needs (see page 9);
• The Pavement Management Plan is consistent with countywide pavement condition assessment standards as described in the OCTA Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines adopted by the OCTA Board of Directors.
*An electronic copy of the Pavement Management P lan (with MicroPAVER or StreetSaver compatible files) has been or will be submitted with the certification statement. A copy of this certification is being provided to the Orange County Transportation Authority.
Submitted by:
__ ______City of Santa Ana Name (Print) Jurisdiction
_____________________________ ______________ Signed Date
Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer
Title
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
51 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 3
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2026 UPDATE OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN (PMP)
As the City of Santa Ana’s infrastructure continues to mature Public Works priorities such as street maintenance and redevelopment are key projects to City staff. With the City mostly built -out, wear and tear on the infrastructure will occur at an ever-increasing rate. Pavement aging through annual weathering, dynamic topology, and increased usage, compounded with the increased cost of performing maintenance and rehabilitation, add to the yearly operational budget of the pavement network. System sustainability can only be achieved through proactive scheduling and the implementation of cost-efficient pavement applications.
In the upcoming years, the City will continue to build upon this study through future inspections and the tracking of annual work history. The Santa Ana PMP data will continue to provide reliable data to enhance the PMP through detailed Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Measure M2 funding analysis, City specific budgetary reporting and level of service reporting. Additionally, the City is considering a strong local overlay program for sections that are older than 20 years.
The Santa Ana PMP has been developed to assist City perso nnel by providing current conditional and economic data and to develop cost -effective maintenance / rehabilitation strategies to maintain a desirable network level of pavement performance while optimizing the expenditur e of limited fiscal resources. The project consisted of analyzing the City’s 2024 dataset for quality and usability. In doing this, we were tasked to generate an updated Capital Improvement Program report that identified recommendations and deficiencies in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City.
We surveyed all designated arterial, collector (MPAH) as well as all local / alley streets this past fall/winter to assist the City in being compliant with OCTA – Measure M2 April, 2026 guidelines. Additionally, we updated the City’s unique Pavement Management – GIS layer that will continue to assist the City in analyzing pavement conditions and other attribute information through the use of MyRoads® and ESRI ArcGIS.
Bucknam Infrastructure Group reviewed the City’s previous maintenance efforts and the current 2026-27 proposed street improvements for pertinent pavement information in order to generate a CIP report that identified recommendations and opportunities for improvement in the current operating and maintenance efforts put forth by the City. The result of these work efforts is this report.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
52 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 4
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
III. BACKGROUND (CITY OF SANTA ANA)
In late 1990, voters throughout Orange County approved a ½ -cent sales tax for transportation improvements known as OC Measure M2. Funding for streets and roads are included within the sales tax and are distributed to local agencies through both formula and a competitive method. In late 2006, the renewal of OC Measure M2 was approved by voters that would continue the ½ -cent sales tax for t hirty additional years, starting in 2011.
The primary of goal of this report is to comply with established guidelines from OCTA to ensure that field data collection and reporting efforts performed by outside consultants or local agency staff are consistent.
This is required in order that funding allocations can be reviewed and based on agency comparable pavement conditions.
Specifically, our findings and recommendations provide Public Works administrators, managers and field personnel with:
* PMP report consistent with OCTA OC Measure M2 guidelines
* the present condition status of the pavement network (arterial, collector, residential and industrial streets), as a whole and of any grouping or individual component within the City; * a ranked list of all streets, or segments of streets, by condition within the network; * rehabilitation/maintenance needs of each street segment by year; * an optimized priority maintenance and rehabilitation program based on cost/benefit analysis and various levels of funding;
* optimum annual pavement expenditure levels for pavement maintenance for the next seven (7) years;
* prediction of the life-cycle performance of the City’s pavement network and each individual street section; and
* pavement condition data and analysis presented in GIS through MyRoads® and ESRI ArcGIS
Pavement is a dynamic structure where deterioration is constantly occurring; thus the pavement management system needs to be updated on a regular basis to reflect these changes in pavement conditions, pavement maintenance histories, and maintenance strategies based upon budgetary constraints. This report reflects our findings and recommendations for the PMP and the current state of the City’s pavement network. Furtherm ore, we have recommended detailed funding and maintenance strategies for the arterial/collector and residential networks for next seven (7) years.
Currently, based upon the City’s maintenance practices an d their associated unit costs, the total replacement value of the Santa Ana pavement network is $ 3,299,050,200. This value clearly indicates that the City’s pavement network is the most valuable and essential asset to Santa Ana. The City’s use of slurry seal, AC Overlay and R&R practices are typically applied every seven years depending on the street conditions. These frequencies are typical but the City may see increases in deterioration rates due to environmental, load and high average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. For example, high ADT volumes along one of Santa Ana’s arterial streets will increase deterioration rates for a previously applied AC Overlay compared to a small local street. These deterioration rates are monitored through frequent inspections and functional class deterioration analysis within the City’s PMP database.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
53 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 5
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Through our assessment of historical maintenance performed within the City and through our discussions with City staff the conditional data found across the network clearly shows that the City has applied strong, preventative maintenance strategies over the past decade. Pavement management involves frequent preventative maintenance; as pavement deteriorates through heavy traffic impacts, weathering and time, preventative maintenances (such as slurry seal, stop gap, etc.) have limited benefits.
Our study has shown that key overlay projects will be needed over the next seven years to maintain the network’s moderate level of condition. Currently, the City’s two major streets networks (Arterial & Local) hold mid-70 weighted PCI value s; it is our recommendation that a proactive, common sense overlay program and a continued slurry seal program be scheduled over the next several fiscal years. This will ensure that the citywide weighted PCI will be sustained and allow for routine slurry seal maintenance to continue.
We have found and recommend the following detailed items which should be reviewed and considered for a proactive approach to the future management of the PMP:
ARTERIAL / COLLECTOR (MPAH) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Arterial (MPAH) street network is currently in “ fair” condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 9 to maintain a “fair” network weighted average PCI value.
Our MPAH findings for conditional data an d recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below:
• The MPAH network has a weighted PCI of 71.8
• The MPAH network consists of 129.3 miles and 33,615,007 SF of pavement;
• Currently, 35% of the MPAH network ( 45.4 miles) qualify for slurry seal/stop gap maintenance; 39% of the network (49.9 miles) qualifies for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance;
• MPAH maintenance/rehabilitation projects should focus on the increasing the current PCI above a weighted average of 75 by FY 2033;
• Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify MPAH overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within StreetSaver;
o Appropriate the MPAH CIP revenues at an average of $8,000,000/yr level for the seven- year term to generate the beneficial results identified on page 9; and
o The Santa Ana “Increase PCI” budget (page 9) will increase the MPAH weighted PCI of
71.8 to 75.0 after seven years, additionally, the citywide deferred backlog increases from a level of $325.6 million to $393.4 million after seven years; and
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
54 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 6
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
• Perform pavement inspections on the MPAH network every two years to continue the City’s solid planning model within StreetSaver to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2.
LOCAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The actual workload requirements identified indicate that the Local street network is currently in “good” condition. To maintain this condition, it is critical that preventive maintenance and overlay activities are funded at the levels identified on page 9 to maintain a “good” network weighted average PCI value. Our Local network findings for conditional data and recommendations for revenue expenditures are shown below:
• The Local network has a weighted PCI of 77.1;
• The Local network consists of 324.5 miles and 59,736,252 SF of pavement;
• Currently, 34% of the Local network (111.1 miles) qualifies for slurry seal/stop gap maintenance; 13% of the Local network (42.3 miles) qualify for rehabilitation/reconstruction maintenance;
• Local maintenance/rehabilitation projects should focus on the increasing the current PCI above a weighted average of 80 by FY 2033;
• Develop a proactive fiscal and planned approach to identify arterial overlay projects based on the deterioration modeling within StreetSaver;
o Appropriate the Local CIP revenues at an average of $8,400,000/yr level for the seven- year term to generate the beneficial results identified on page 9; and
o The Santa Ana “Increase PCI” budget (page 9) will increase the Local weighted PCI of 77.1 to 82 after seven years, additionally, the citywide deferred backlog increases from a level of $325.6 million to $393.4 million after seven years; and
• Perform pavement inspections on the Local network every two years to continue the City’s solid planning model within StreetSaver to track PCI deterioration; also follows new OCTA guidelines for Measure M2.
• Increase the amount of Local funding to allow for overlays of sections that are older than 20 years
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
55 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 7
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
IV. CURRENT PAVEMENT CONDITIONS (PCI)
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
56 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 8
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
V. PROJECTED PAVEMENT CONDITIONS (PCI) – CURRENT BUDGET
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
57 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 9
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
VI. ALTERNATIVE FUNDING LEVELS
Maintain Existing Average Network PCI
Improve Average Network PCI
VII. CURRENT AND PROJECTED BACKLOG BY YEAR OF PAVEMENT
MAINTENANCE NEEDS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
58 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 10
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
VIII. CENTERLINE MILEAGE
IX. PERCENTAGE OF NETWORK IN EACH OF FIVE CONDITION CATEGORIES
BASED ON CENTERLINE MILES
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
59 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 11
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
X. REDUCTION IN M2 LOCAL MATCH
A local agency match reduction of 10% of the eligible cost for projects submitted for consideration of funding through the M2 Comprehensive Transportation Funding Programs (CTFP) call for projects is available if the local agency either:
a. Shows measurable improvement of paved road conditions during the previous reporting period defined as an overall weighted (by area) average system improvemen t of one Pavement Condition Index (PCI) point with no reduction in the overall weighted (by area) average PCI in the Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) or local categories:
or
b. Have road pavement conditions during the previous reporting period, within the highest 20% of the scale for road pavement conditions in conformance with OCTA Ordinance No. 3, defined as a PCI of 75 or higher, otherwise defined as in “good condition”.
Road conditions found through our 2026 PMP management study shows that the City is eligible for Local Match Reduction based on the current network weighted PCI of 75.2. Additionally, the City of Santa Ana has demonstrated, with the enclosed budget projection s (page 9), that the City’s weighte d average PCI (by area) remains above a PCI of 75 after the seven-year program.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
60 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 12
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
XI. APPENDIX A – SEVEN YEAR ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION
PLAN BASED ON CURRENT OR EXPECTED FUNDING LEVEL
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
61 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 13
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
XII. APPENDIX B – COMPLETE LISTING OF CURRENT STREET CONDITIONS
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
62 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 14
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
XIII. APPENDIX C – GIS DIGITAL DATA
Introduction
The OCTA GIS Section maintains a spatial inventory of transportation infrastructure which mostly consists of major arterial streets, roads, and highways. A key component of road information is pavement condition. Maintaining an inventory of pavement condition will enhance OCTA’s GIS visualization and analysis capabilities and assist in understanding the transportation investment needs throughout the region. Therefore, a GIS dataset in digital format should be included in this report.
Structure of GIS Data
The GIS dataset must consist of linear geographic features that represent road/street segments. All segments that are part of the report should be included in the GIS dataset. The attribute inf ormation of each segment should generally follow the format of the Complete Listing of Current Street Conditions in Appendix B above.
The GIS data requirements are discussed below. Most commercial and open-source GIS software provide industry-standard tools to manage GIS data to meet these requirements.
GIS Digital Data Format
The GIS data must be submitted in either one of the following formats:
• Esri Shapefile, or
• Esri File Geodatabase
Metadata
The GIS data are required to have associated metadata. The minimum metadata items required are:
• Title of Dataset
• Tags (A set of words that can be used by GIS to search for the resource. For example: “pavement”, “transportation”, “roads”)
• Summary (A brief purpose statement of the dataset)
• Description (A brief narrative of the dataset’s content) • Credits (A recognition of those who created or contributed to the resource) Spatial Geometry Type
The spatial geometry of the segment features must be lines that represent the roadway centerline as accurately as possible.
Projection
The GIS data must have spatial reference information and have its coordinate system identified and embedded in or associated with the data file(s). All GIS data submitted to OCTA should be in the following projected coordinate system:
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
63 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 15
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
• NAD 1983 State Plane California VI FIPS 0406 (US Feet) - More information about this system can be found at: https://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/nad83-california-zone-6-ftus/ GIS Feature Attributes
The required segment attributes are:
• Street name
• Unique segment identifier (Segment ID from original source if available) • Name of intersecting road at the beginning of a segment • Name of intersecting road at the end of the segment
• Current pavement condition index (PCI)
• Current PCI inspection date
• Length of road segment in feet
• Width of road segment in feet
• Paved area of road segment in square feet or square yards • Projected PCI at end of Seven-Year Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Plan Additional attributes such as number of through travel lanes, direction of travel and pavement surface type may be provided.
XIV. APPENDIX D – QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
Introduction
When performing data collection in any field, the need for quality control is paramount as it is essential for accurate planning, analysis and design. This is particularly true for collecting pavement distress data for a pavement management program.
The Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan establishe s minimum quality standards for performance and procedures for update of the pavement management program.
Objectives
This document constitutes a formal QA/QC Plan for the City of Santa Ana. It was prepared in April, 2020 and last revised in April, 2026.
Specifically, it is intended for the 2026 Pavement Management Plan Update. The focus is on the collection of network-level pavement distress data (defined by National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 401 Quality Management of Paveme nt Data Collection, as “Network -level data collection involves collection of large quantities of pavement condition data, which is often converted to individual condition indices or aggregated into composite condition indices”.
This document also addresse s the QA/QC plan requirements of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA)’s “Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines” (Section 2.4), adopted in May 2010.
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
64 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 16
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
Structure of QA/QC Plan
The following components are addressed in this QA/QC Plan:
• Condition survey procedures used;
• Accuracy required for data collection;
• Inspector qualifications and experience; and
• Safety.
Condition Survey Procedures
The governing document in performing condition surveys for the City of Santa Ana is ASTM D6433 “Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index (PCI) Surveys.” Both asphalt concrete (AC) and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements are included in this protocol. The following distresses are collected for each pavement type:
As required by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), the City of Santa Ana must prepare and implement a quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) plan regarding pavement management inspection as they pertain to StreetSaver. For the purposes of this report, Bucknam has demonstrated below how our project team implemented QA/QC procedures during the project.
Our QA/QC plan focuses on the how each pavement inspection is performed, what distresses are collected and ensures that it complies with the OCTA guidelines defined within the “Countywide Pavement Management Plan Guidelines (CPMPG)”.
As shown within the OCTA CPMPG, our staff followed and delivered on the requirements stated within Chapter 2, page 2-5 which require specific QA/QC data (Items A through G).
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
65 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 17
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
Additionally, Chapter 3 requires numerous data/deli verables from local agencies for OC Measure M2 eligibility. All general PCI budgetary report submittals will follow the Chapter 3 guidelines.
In conjunction with the outlined items within the CPMPG Section 2 we have summarized our QA/QC procedures below:
a. Descriptions of condition survey - Our staff follows t he required Condition Survey Protocols (CPMPG, Chapter 2); our staff assesses each pavement section for the minimum distresses outlined within Chapter 2, page 2-1. Additionally, based on the pavement conditions found, we collect all MicroPAVER/StreetSaver Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) distresses, if found within the sample sections; for example, if slippage cracking, potholes, etc. are found our survey technicians record the proper information.
b. How data was collected - Our surveys follow the OCTA accepted walking requirements. All sections that our staff surveys are performed through the walking method, approximately 10% of all sections surveyed were complemented with windshield surveys based on unique conditions found. Our staff physically measures the width of every section as well as measure for any square footage adjustment that need to be added or taken away from a sections “true area” (i.e. cul-de- sac, bus pads, street width variances, etc.). Samples taken always include a minimum of 2,500 SF coverage unless specific section limits prohibit this. Arterial section samples utilize a 3,500 SF sample size due to the larger section area (this is within the ASTM D6433 sample size calculation.
Field crews typically include one individual for residential pavement sections while Arterial (MPAH) routes utilize a two-person crew for safety, traffic control and increases quality control. c. Accuracy required for data collection - We use a statistical sampling approach for measuring the quality of our field technician’s work. In this manner, 10 percent of the original surveys are re - surveyed by a different survey crew than the original, supervised by a field supervisor, and the results are compared to the original surveys. O ur QC process involves checking the field crews’ work in a “blind study” fashion. Quality control checks are performed at the end of each survey week. This ensures that all field personnel are properly collecting section samples, distress types and distress severities for all street segments.
❖ When QA/QC issues are found, our staff documents the issues within MicroPAVER’s/StreetSaver’s user interface. If distress types found are not within the 97% accuracy our QA/QC is expanded beyond our minimum 10% resurvey to 20% of the original survey
d. Random and Systematic Re-Inspections – As described above our staff re-inspects, as a minimum, 10% of the original survey (OCTA only requires 5%). Per the agenc y’s requests, our staff will submit PCI reports to the agency as project status reports for their review. Agencies will typically review specific pavement sections for PCI accuracy based on recent overlay or slurry seal maintenance; this serves as an initial accuracy check on our surveys (outside Bucknam QC efforts).
Additionally, our staff performs “ride -a-long” surveys with local agency staff to build consensus on how our MicroPAVER/StreetSaver ACOE surveys are performed, recorded and reported on.
Random re-inspections will include a representative selection across the following categories:
• Functional classed (i.e. MPAH, locals);
• Surface types (e.g. AC or PCC);
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
66 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 18
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
• Pavement conditions (e.g. good, fair, poor);
• Inspectors;
• Geographical areas, if applicable.
For systematic re-inspections, this could be due to noticed trends such as specific treatment types (e.g. open -graded mixed), a specific inspector or geographical area. In these cases Bucknam continues to utilize a 10% re-inspection policy.
e. PCI Comparison with Past Surveys - if previous inspection data is available, new PCI’s calculated through the most recent inspections will be compared to previous PCI’s. If the variance in PCI is greater than +/- 10 PCI points, these sections will be flagged for further investigation and/ or re- inspection (In the cases that a PCI increases or decreases by 10 points follows the established CPMPG guidelines; Appendix A, page A-18).
f. Schedule of data submittal – Pending on the City’s last major PMP submittal, Bucknam will assist the agency in submitting the following:
❖ Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) routes will be surveyed and reported on at least once every two years
❖ Local streets will be surveyed and reported on every six years ❖ Corresponding MPAH and local PCI reporting and budgetary reporting will be submitted every two years
g. Inspector’s Qualifications and Experience – Bucknam staff have been trained on the use of StreetSaver and the segment calibration/verification and inspection practices. Mr. Peter Bucknam (Project Manager) has completed the MicroPAVER Certification of Professional Development courses. All Bucknam field technicians are trained using the ASTM D6433 survey methodologies and have passed OCTA’s prequalification testing every year since 2010.
Bucknam Infrastructure Group inspectors have attended formal training on pavement condition distress surveys. This training was conducted prior to performing any work using the ASTM D6433 protocols, consistent with OCTA’s requirements.
Attachments – Inspectors Certifications
• Certificate of Prequalification – OCTA Pavement Inspector Prequalification Program (see below):
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
67 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 19
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
d. Safety procedures – Bucknam field survey techniques utilize the following procedures:
a. All vehicles are properly marked or flagged with appropriate sign markings indicating that a “PAVEMENT SURVEY IS IN PROGRESS”;
b. All vehicles have the proper flashing amber light beacons placed on the top of the vehicle to allow for proper visibility and line-of-site warning; c. Large MPAH routes are surveyed using two field technicians to increase traffic control warning and safety;
d. While parking or stopping along the survey route, vehicles legally park within the ri ght- of-way or use a parking lot;
e. All field technicians wear ANSI – 105 Class II safety vests
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
68 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 20
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
XV. APPENDIX E – PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT DATA FILES
The City of Santa Ana StreetSaver database is available online through MTC StreetSaver’s website; to log in and review PMP data OCTA will need to obtain permission from Santa Ana staff and MTC . Available PMP data and the associated reporting data includes:
• Street names and limits for the City’s public streets • Street identifiers (Branch ID, Section ID)
• Direction (if applicable)
• Beginning and ending of each section
• Length, width and true areas
• Functional Classification (MPAH, Local)
• Number of travel lanes
• Pavement Condition Index (PCI) and date of inspection • Type of recommended treatment
• Cost of recommended treatment
• Street geometry as linear of polygon features
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
69 6/2/2026
City of Santa Ana, CA Page 21
2026 Citywide Pavement Management Plan – OCTA Submittal Final Report – March 16, 2026
XVI. APPENDIX F – GIS MAPS / CURRENT CONDITIONS (OPTIONAL) EXHIBIT 2
City Council
18 –
70 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA CONCERNING THE UPDATE OF THE LOCAL
SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN FOR THE MEASURE
M (M2) PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Orange County Transportation Authority (“OCTA”) has developed the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan to identify traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals within and across jurisdictional boundaries, and defines the means of implementing the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program; and
WHEREAS, the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program requires that local jurisdictions adopt a Local Signal Synchronization Plan consistent with the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Master Plan as a key component of local jurisdictions’ efforts to synchronizing traffic signals across local jurisdictions’ boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Local Signal Synchronization Plan must be updated by June 30, 2026 to continue to be eligible to receive Net Revenues as part of Measure M2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council for the City of Santa Ana, does hereby inform OCTA that:
Section 1. T
he City adopts and maintains a Local Signal Synchronization Plan which includes goals that are consistent with those outlined as part of the Regional Signal Synchronization Master Plan, including signal synchronization across jurisdictions.
Section 2. The Loc
al Signal Synchronization Plan identifies traffic s ignal synchronization street routes, including all elements of the Regional Signal Synchronization Network located within the City.
Section 3. Th
e Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes the tr affic signal inventory for all traffic signal synchronization street routes.
Section 4. Th e Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes a three- year plan showing capital, operations, and maintenance of signal synchronization along the traffic signal synchronization street routes and traffic signals.
Section 5. Th
e Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes an update on the status and performance of traffic signal synchronization activities.
EXHIBIT 3
City Council
18 –
71 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XX
Section 6. The Local Signal Synchronization Plan includes a discussion on the review and revision, as may be necessary, on the timing of traffic signals on the traffic signal synchronization street routes.
Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the
City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
ADOPTE
D this ____ day of ___________, 2026.
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPR
OVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:
Kyle Nellesen
Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Counc
il members
NOES: Counc
il members
ABSTAIN
: Council members
NOT PR
ESENT: Councilm embers _
EXHIBIT 3
City Council
18 –
72 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XX
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby c ertify the attached Resolution No. 2026-XX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Counc il of the City of Santa Ana on _____________________, 2026.
Date:
City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
EXHIBIT 3
City Council
18 –
73 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| i
SANTA ANA
LOCAL SIGNAL
SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN
2026
June 2, 2026
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
74 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 1
INTRODUCTION
On November 6, 1990, the voters in Orange County approved a ½ percent sales tax for twenty years to fund transportation improvements known as Measure M. This sales tax provides funding for street and road improvements to local agencies through formula distribution and competitive processes. On November 6, 2006, voters approved Measure M2 to continue the ½ percent sales tax for thirty years, beginning in 2011.
Project P, the Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (RTSSP), was included as part of Measure M2.
The RTSSP is comprised of a 750-mile regional signal synchronization network with approximately 2,000 signals. The goals of the program are to improve the flow of traffic on Orange County streets and roads by implementing multi-agency signal synchronization. Local agencies and Caltrans are encouraged to work cooperatively with the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to synchronize traffic signals throughout Orange County on a corridor basis to improve travel time and reduce stops. Local agencies will maintain local control and responsibility for signals within their jurisdiction. Any changes to traffic signals, signal timing equipment, or related signal policies (including transit signal priority, transit preemption, or emergency vehicle preemption) are at the full discretion of the responsible local agency.
To establish eligibility for Measure M2 funds in general and Traffic Signal Synchronization Program (TSSP) in specific, including both fair-share and competitive programs, local agencies must meet the following requirements:
1. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Adoption
Adopt and maintain a Local Signal Synchronization Plan by June 30, 2026. The plan must be consistent with OCTA Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan.
2. Local Signal Synchronization Plan Update
To remain eligible, the local agencies must maintain and update the plan every three years for the duration of Measure M2.
In addition to the requirement for Measure M2 funds, the City of Santa Ana’s Local Signal Synchronization Plan also establishes the needs for well- maintained and synchronized traffic signals to reduce congestion and provide safe and efficient traffic movements in the City.
The City initially adopted the Local Signal Synchronization Plan on December 6, 2010 and subsequently updated on June 19, 2014, June 28, 2017, June 16, 2020, and June 23, 2023. This is the update for June 2026.
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
75 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 2
I. Local Signal Synchronization Goals
The primary goal is to maintain a safe and efficient
transportation network with emphasis on traffic
signal synchronization along major corridors. This
Local Signal Synchronization Plan will serve as a
guide for the implementation and maintenance of
optimized signal timing along these corridors. The
objective is to reduce delay, number of stops, fuel
consumption, and air pollution emissions along with
optimizing traffic progression through the system. A
key focus of the City is improving safety for all
roadway users. A well-timed, synchronized system
will reduce collisions as a result of improved traffic
flow and will minimize diversion of traffic to local and residential neighborhoods, improving safety and
traffic conditions in those areas. The City is also
focused on improving emergency vehicle response
times through traffic signal pre-emption, allowing for
much safer travel through the signal system. Another
priority is supporting multimodal transportation,
including active transportation and transit signal
priority, while finding a balance between the needs
of all roadway users to promote a more equitable
transportation system.
The City has been synchronizing its traffic signals
since the 1970’s with the implementation of the
Multisonics Vehicle Management System. Since
then, the City has continued to upgrade and improve
its traffic signal infrastructure and operations. The
City’s major effort in improving its traffic signal
operations and infrastructure began in early 1990’s
when the City received funding from State of
California Transportation System Management
grants to implement an Advanced Traffic
Management System (ATMS) that included traffic
communication infrastructure, new traffic signal
systems, and incorporated many elements of
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) such as
CCTV, Video Detection Systems (VDS), and
Changeable Message Signs (CMS). The City is
actively upgrading all communications infrastructure
to Fiber Optic Cable to facilitate faster
communication and synchronization between
intersections and the central ATMS system.
Recognizing the need to maintain uninterrupted
traffic flow through adjacent agencies, the City
started to work with Caltrans in the early 1990s for
the City to maintain and operate the majority of
Caltrans’ ramp traffic signals in Santa Ana to allow
synchronization with local traffic signals. Similarly,
in 1992, the City of Fountain Valley agreed to share
the operation of its traffic signals on Harbor Blvd
with Santa Ana so Harbor Blvd could be
synchronized throughout both cities.
Additionally, Santa Ana has maintenance
agreements with the neighboring cities of Costa
Mesa, Garden Grove, Orange, Tustin and Fountain
Valley to maintain and operate signals that reside in
both City limits. Since then, the City has been
active in replacing outdated equipment and
upgrading traffic signal infrastructure to help
achieve its goals of maintaining and further
progressing a safe and efficient network of streets.
As part of the effort to maintain traffic flow and
reduce congestion, the City analyzed and optimized
all of its arterial streets including synchronization on all major arterials in the City in 2004 and again in
2010. Since then, the City has participated in
numerous OCTA Regional Traffic Signal
Synchronization Program (RTSSP) corridors. The
City fully supports and commits to working with
OCTA and other local agencies to maintain
regional traffic synchronization on all arterials in the OCTA Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization
Program.
Since the previous LSSP update in 2023, the City of
Santa Ana has participated in RTSSP projects along
the following corridors:
Edinger Avenue
Warner Avenue
MacArthur Boulevard
First Street-Bolsa Avenue
Tustin Avenue-Rose Drive
Segerstrom Avenue-Dyer Road
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
76 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 3
The City’s plan moving forward includes the following near-term and long-term goals:
1. Near-term:
(a) Maintain synchronization on all arterials in
the City
(b) Complete synchronization timing for the
following corridors:
Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell
Street/Grand Avenue
1 st Street
Euclid Street
McFadden Avenue
Bristol Avenue
17 th Street-Westminster
Avenue
(c) Advance the Traffic Signal & ITS Master
Plan
(d) Upgrade central business district
(downtown) traffic signal controllers
(e ) Relocate Traffic Management Center to
Ross Annex Building
2. Long Term:
(a) Continue to maintain synchronization on all
arterials in the City
(b) Complete the Citywide fiber communication
network
(c) Upgrade all traffic signal controllers to
Advance Traffic Controllers
(d) Retime arterials every 3 to 4 years or
Citywide every 6 to 10 years
(e) Complete implementation of Video
detection citywide
(f) Replace outdated traffic signal cabinets
(g) Upgrade signals to current standards for
pedestrians and bicycles
(h) Implement the latest proven technology to
monitor and improve traffic signal
operations where feasible
(i) Employ Advance Traffic Signal
Performance (ATSPM) Measures
(j) Prepare for Connected Vehicle technology
(k) Implement Transit Signal Priority (TSP)
along bus routes
(l) Install Emergency Vehicle Preemption
(EVP) along priority corridors to improve
response times
(m) Install Battery Back-up Systems (BBS) to
improve traffic signal reliability
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
77 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 4
II. Traffic Signal Synchronization Street Routes
The arterials and streets in the City Master Plan of Streets and Highways are part of the City LSSP. Many of these arterials are also part of OCTA’s Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Plan. Table 1 (Synchronized Streets) and Figure 1 (Traffic Signal Synchronization Routes) on the following pages represent all streets and traffic signals that are currently synchronized and monitored on a regular basis.
Table 1 - Synchronized Streets
Arterial Classification Synchronized OCTA
RTSSP
1 Westminster Ave/17th St Major Yes Yes
2 1st St Major Yes Yes
3 Edinger Ave Major Yes Yes
4 Warner Ave Major Yes Yes
5 Segerstrom Ave/Dyer Rd Principal/Major/Primary Yes Yes 6 MacArthur Blvd Major Yes Yes
7 Euclid St Major Yes Yes
8 Harbor Blvd Major Yes Yes
9 Fairview St Major Yes Yes
10 Bristol St Major Yes Yes
11 Main St Major/Primary/Secondary Yes Yes
12 Grand Ave Major Yes Yes
13 Tustin Ave Major Yes Yes
14 McFadden Ave Secondary Partial Yes
15 Newhope St Secondary Yes No
16 Civic Center Dr Secondary Partial No
17 Santa Ana Blvd Major/Primary Partial No
18 4th St Major/Primary Partial No
19 Flower St Primary/Secondary Partial No
20 Central Business District Misc. Yes No
21 Broadway Secondary Partial No
22 Standard Ave Secondary Partial No
23 Raitt St Secondary Partial No
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
78 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 5
Figure 1- Traffic Signal Synchronization Routes
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
79 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 6
III. Traffic Signal Infrastructures and
Synchronization Inventory
A. Traffic Management Center (TMC)
The TMC provides City staff with a centralized
command and control of all city traffic signals. It
supports all current and future ITS field devices and
technologies. It is a central housing for all traffic signal systems, communication hardware, and traffic signal
video/monitoring systems.
The City has a Main TMC located at the City Hall
Building, 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701,
shown in Image 1. There is also a Remote TMC
located with the same address in the adjacent Ross
Annex Building, shown in Image 2.
As part of the upcoming Bristol RTSSP, the City plans to relocate the existing Main TMC facility and systems into the Ross Annex Building. This will allow the city to
decommission the existing Remote TMC (RTMC) and
centralize its traffic operations and related systems within a new Main TMC. The new Main TMC is to be relocated
to the same floor space and operations area as all traffic engineering personnel.
As part of the TMC relocation, the City anticipates
relocating the existing servers to new server racks,
relocating existing workstations and procuring new
workstations, implementing a new video wall, and
reterminating the City’s fiber optic cable at the new
TMC. Additionally, the City will refresh their existing Centracs licensing for an additional three years. The
City of Santa Ana uses Econolite Centracs Central
Advanced Transportation Management System
(ATMS). Centracs is used to facilitate the operation of the existing traffic control system via the existing
communication infrastructure.
The existing TMC systems communicate to the entire
traffic network through seventeen (17) separate fiber
optic legs. Each cable is terminated on 1 of 3 FDUs
(Fiber Distribution Units) housed in the TMC server
racks. These (17) communication legs are all landed on
a Layer 3 Ethernet Switch which acts as the central
gateway on the network. An image of the TMC
equipment room is shown in Image 3.
Image 1 – City of Santa Ana Traffic Management
Center
Image 2 – City of Santa Ana Remote Traffic
Management Center
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
80 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 7
B. Traffic Signal System, Controllers and Cabinets
The City of Santa Ana
currently operates Econolite’s
Centracs Advanced
Transportation Management
System (ATMS) software,
which communicates with
traffic signal controllers
through the City’s Ethernet
communications network.
Centracs ATMS provides a
citywide, map-based interface
that allows staff to quickly view
intersection status and identify
locations that are offline,
online, or requiring attention.
The system supports remote
monitoring and
troubleshooting by providing
access to controller status
information, alarms, and event
logs. Centracs ATMS also
supports remote updates to controller databases, which helps staff implement timing plan changes and coordination updates efficiently. In addition, Centracs can generate automated notifications, including email alters for traffic signal pre-emption faults. Together, these capabilities provide the City with a centralized platform to monitor system health, respond to issues quickly, and support efficient ongoing management of traffic signal operations. Figure 2 provides an example of the Centracs citywide status map interface.
Figure 2 – Centracs Citywide Signal Status
Overview Map
Figure 3 – Centracs Intersection Signal Graphics
Image 3 – City of Santa Ana TMC Equipment Room
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
81 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 8
In 2011, the City completed an eight-phase project to
upgrade all outdated NEMA controllers to 2070
controllers running then-current firmware. This project allowed the City to fully integrate and utilize Centracs in effectively managing all 329 traffic signals. Since
that deployment, many of the existing controllers have
reached end-of-life status and are no longer being
supported by the manufacturer. Furthermore, these
existing controllers lack key capabilities available in modern platforms, including advanced fault detection,
enhanced monitoring of conflicting indications,
improved cabinet and signal health diagnostics, and
modern fail-safe operation, fault isolation, and
controller recovery capabilities that reduce the risk of unsafe signal behavior during equipment or power
failures. Accordingly, the City plans to upgrade all
controllers to Advanced Traffic Controllers to better
support advanced traffic signal performance
measures, transit signal priority, connected vehicle
technology, and modern safety standards.
Most of Santa Ana’s signal cabinets are Type 332
which are built to conform to the widely used Caltrans
TEES standards. The 332 cabinets utilize rack mount
equipment for the output file, input files, PDA, and
other components that are in the cabinet. The city
also has numerous legacy cabinets that are National
Electric Manufacturers Association (NEMA), Type
P(TS1) and Type M (Pole Mount). The City currently
plans on upgrading all outdated cabinets to their
preferred Type 332 or an Advanced Traffic Controller
Cabinet (ATCC). Both cabinets have the same
footprint, while the ATCC can operate with reduced
equipment and a cleaner layout for add-ons (including
communication, fiber, radio, BBS, EVP, and TSP
equipment), resulting in simpler maintenance, easier
troubleshooting, and greater flexibility to expand for
the City’s future operational and communications
needs.
C. Traffic Signal Video Monitoring System
The City has installed CCTV cameras at one-
hundred thirty-five (135) locations. These cameras
are installed to assist the city with a variety of
functions, including observing traffic conditions, road construction activities, incident
management, and identifying roadway issues. This
capability enables faster response times, reduced
traffic impacts, and improves overall system
performance. The City’s CCTV cameras are
managed and monitored through Milestone Video
Management Software (VMS). All cameras are
available to City staff at workstations running
Milestone VMS Client software and can also be
displayed on the video wall through the display PCs.
City staff actively uses the CCTV cameras
to monitor traffic conditions along the busiest and
most traveled corridors and intersections.
Building on the City’s CCTV capabilities, video feeds
from the Video Detection Systems (VDS) further
enhance day-to-day signal operations and data-
driven decision-making. VDS feeds, which are
available from both the TMC and
Remote TMC, provide real-time visual verification in
addition to detection functionality. VDS supports stop- bar and advance vehicle detection, bicycle detection
and differentiation, and the collection of turning
movement counts. These capabilities enable the staff
to quickly diagnose vehicle and bicycle detection
issues, evaluate detection performance, and more
informed signal timing and coordination adjustments.
VDS data and videos reduce the need for field visits,
improve response times, and support more efficient
corridor operations. Together, these capabilities
improve staff productivity, enable more proactive
system management, and allow
the City to operate and maintain a growing signal
system more efficiently using existing resources.
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
82 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 9
D. Traffic Signal Communication
The city currently uses a combination of twisted wire pair (TWP), Fiber Optics (FO), and wireless radios for field device communications. Most of the traffic signals communication is via the City underground hardwired interconnect network, and similarly, communication to CCTV cameras is via the City underground fiber-optic network. Where fiber-optic is not available, wireless or hardwire interconnect is used for CCTV cameras. The City plans to upgrade all communication to Fiber-optic as funding becomes available.
The City traffic signal network is comprised of ‘network zones’ configured in one or more daisy chain rings. These daisy chains create an interconnected network of all traffic signal and ITS devices , originating from the TMC, which provides network redundancy and IP network segmentation. Each zone is supported by a Layer 3 Ethernet switch providing the network routing for devices on that ring. In addition, each traffic signal is supported with Layer 2 fiber optic switches enabling a link to the TMC. This traffic signal network provides a high-speed, high-bandwidth, and secure connection from the TMC to the ITS elements. Furthermore, Santa Ana employs a Network Performance Monitor (NPM) software for network management and monitoring which allows City staff to quickly and remotely troubleshoot network and communication issues.
E. Traffic Signal Synchronization
The traffic signals on the designated arterials in the LSSP are inventoried and listed in Table 2 (Traffic Synchronization Inventory). The table identifies all intersections for each arterial, associated controller type and firmware, detailed synchronization data such as cycle length of each synchronized period and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) equipment. Synchronization periods include AM, Mid-day, PM and Weekend.
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
83 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 10
Table 2 - Traffic Synchronization Inventory
Cycle Length Equipment
Corridor Cross Street Intersection AM MID PM WKND
Maintenance
Responsibility Cabinet Type Software Detection
Bike
Detection CCTV
Power
Backup Comm Other ITS ATMS Status
Westminster/17th
Newhope St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Harbor Blvd 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Clinton St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Fairview St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loop s Yes Bosch UPS Wireless Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online King St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Cohu Fiber Centracs Online English St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Alona St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online College Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 AS C/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bristol Market Pl 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bristol St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/ 3 Video Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Fire Station Free Free Free Free Santa Ana M ASC/3 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Flower St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Ross St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Broadway 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Main St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Spurgeon St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Penn Wy 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Santiago St/I-5 NB off 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Lincoln Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Grand Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Linwood Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Mabury St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Cabrillo Pk/Sherry Ln 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Centre on 17th 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Tustin Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS2 Type 1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP, Bluetooth Centracs Online 1st Street
Euclid St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Newhope St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Harbor Blvd 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Jackson St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Fairview St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Sullivan St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Center St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Townsend St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Raitt St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Pacific St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Bristol St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Flower St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Ross St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Broadway 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Sycamore St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Main St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bush St/Cypress St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Copper EVP Centracs Online Downtown Plaza 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Copper EVP Centracs Online Standard Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Grand Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Lyon St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
84 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 11
Cycle Length Equipment
Corridor Cross Street Intersection AM MID PM WKND
Maintenance
Responsibility Cabinet Type Software Detection
Bike
Detection CCTV
Power
Backup Comm Other ITS ATMS Status
Elk Ln/I-5 NB off 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online I-5 SB on 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Cabrillo Park Dr 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Golden Circle 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Edinger Ave
Newhope St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Harbor Blvd 140 130 140 130 Fountain Valley P (TS1) Coba lt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Mohawk Dr 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Fairview St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Sullivan St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Greenville St 140 130 140 130 Sant a Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Center St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Raitt St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Pacific Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bristol St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EO S Loops Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Baker St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Towner St (PHB) (Future) 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Flower St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Wireless EVP Centracs Online Broadway 140 140 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Main St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Orange St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Maple Bike Trail 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Standard Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Grand Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Lyon St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Ritchey St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Warner Ave
Harbor Blvd 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Yale St 140 130 140 65 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Susan St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Fairview St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Greenville St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Raitt St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Centracs Online Bike Trail 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Pacific Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Bristol St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Flower St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Main St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Maple Bike Trail 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Halladay St 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Standard Ave 140 130 140 65 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Fire Station #2 Free Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Wireless Centracs Online Grand Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Wright St Free Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Pullman St Free Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Bluetooth Centracs Online Warner Common/ The Row Free Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Segerstrom Ave
Harbor Blvd 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Susan St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Fairview St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber Centracs Online Greenville St 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Wireless Centracs Online EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
85 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 12
Cycle Length Equipment
Corridor Cross Street Intersection AM MID PM WKND
Maintenance
Responsibility Cabinet Type Software Detection
Bike
Detection CCTV
Power
Backup Comm Other ITS ATMS Status
Raitt St 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Wireless Centracs Online Bear St 140 140 140 140 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Wireless EVP Centracs Online Spruce St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bristol St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth Centracs Online Rosewood Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Coba lt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Lowell St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Copper EVP Centracs Online Flower St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Dyer Road
Garnsey St 140 140 140 140 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Wireless EVP Centracs Online Alton Bike Trail 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Other No Copper Centracs Online Main St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Centracs Online Halladay St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Tech Center Dr 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Hotel Terrace/SR-55 SB ramp 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Other EVP Centracs Online Grand Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online SR-55 NB off ramp 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Pullman St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber Centracs Online MacArthur Blvd
Hyland St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Wireless EVP Centracs Online Harbor Blvd 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Home Depot 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Susan St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Fairview St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Greenville St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Raitt St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bear St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Plaza Dr 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bristol St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Towner St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Flower St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Centracs Online Birch St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Main St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online MacArthur Pl 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis BBS Fiber EVP Centracs Online Euclid St
Oakfield St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Hazard Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online 5th St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online McFadden Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Harbor Blvd
Hazard Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online 5th St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online McFadden Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Centracs Online Kent Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Lilac Ave 140 130 140 130 Fountain Valley Other Cobalt EOS Video Yes Copper Centracs Online Heil St 140 130 140 130 Fountain Valley P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online Garry Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Fairview St
Trask Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Axis Wireless EVP Centracs Online Edna Dr 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Civic Center Dr 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Wireless EVP Centracs Online OCSC Ped Xing/ RR Xing 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes BBS Fiber Centracs Online 5th St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Willits St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Wireless Centracs Online EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
86 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 13
Cycle Length Equipment
Corridor Cross Street Intersection AM MID PM WKND
Maintenance
Responsibility Cabinet Type Software Detection
Bike
Detection CCTV
Power
Backup Comm Other ITS ATMS Status
Highland St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online McFadden Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Centennial Rd/St. Andrew 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Video No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Harvard St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Alton Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Bristol St
Riverglen Ln 140 Free 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Memory Ln 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Centracs Online Santa Clara Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Bristol Mkt Pl/19th 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Washington Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Civic Center Dr 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Coba lt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Santa Ana Blvd 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bishop St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online McFadden Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Wilshire Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online St Andrew Pl 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Centracs Online Glenwood Pl 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Central Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber Centracs Online Hemlock Wy 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Alton Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Cohu Fiber Centracs Online Target/Bristol Plaza 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Callens Common 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Main St
MainPlace/Town & Country 120 120 120 120 Santa Ana P (TS1) Co balt EOS Loops No Axis Wireless EVP Centracs Online MainPlace/City Place 120 120 120 120 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Memory Ln 120 120 120 120 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Copper EVP Centracs Online Walkie Wy 120 120 120 120 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Copper EVP Centracs Online Bowers Museum 120 Free 120 Free Santa Ana 332 Co balt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online 20th St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online 15th St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Washington Ave 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online 10th St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online 8th St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Civic Center Dr 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online 5th St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Santa Ana Blvd 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online 4th St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt ASC/3 Video Yes Copper EVP Centracs Online 3rd St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Walnut St (PHB) 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Chestnut Ave 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bishop St 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Cubbon St 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online McFadden Ave 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Russell Ave 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Borchard Ave 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Pomona St 140 130 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online St. Andrew Pl 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online St. Gertrude Pl 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Goetz Ave 140 Free 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video No Fiber EVP Centracs Online EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
87 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 14
Cycle Length Equipment
Corridor Cross Street Intersection AM MID PM WKND
Maintenance
Responsibility Cabinet Type Software Detection
Bike
Detection CCTV
Power
Backup Comm Other ITS ATMS Status
Alton Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Columbine Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Murphy Ave/Sandpointe Ave 140 Free Free Fr ee Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Sunflower Ave 140 Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Copper Centracs Online Grand Ave
Fairhaven Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Copper Bluetooth Centracs Online Santa Clara Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Cohu Fiber Centracs Online 21st St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber Centracs Online I-5 NB off 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Santa Ana Blvd/I-5 SB on 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Copper Centracs Online Fruit St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online 6th St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Wireless Centracs Online 4th St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Chestnut Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Coba lt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber Centracs Online McFadden Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Century High 140 Free 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online St. Andrew Pl 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online St. Gertrude Pl 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online Hotel Terrace/Brookhollow 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Fiber Centracs Online SR-55 SB off ramp 70 65 70 65 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Other EVP Centracs Online Tustin Ave
Santa Clara Ave 140 100 140 130 Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber Centracs Online Centre on 17th/Tustin Center 140 Free 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Wellington Ave 140 Free 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Fruit St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Coba lt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online 4th St 130 100 130 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Civic Center Dr
English St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Raitt St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Pacific Ave 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Baker St 140 Free 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Boyd Way 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online Flower St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Cohu Copper Centracs Online Ross St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Copper Centracs Online Parton St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online OC Garage/ Ped Xing 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Broadway 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Cohu Fiber Centracs Online Sycamore St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online Bush St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Santa Ana Blvd
Pacific Ave 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana P (TS2 Type 1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Copper Centracs Online Shelton St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana P (TS2 Type 1) Cobalt EOS Video Yes Copper Centracs Online Flower St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Parton St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Copper Centracs Online Ross St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Copper Centracs Online Ped Xing 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Broadway 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Cohu Fiber Centracs Online Sycamore St Ped Xing 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bush St 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Copper Centracs Online French St 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Mortimer St (PHB) 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Co balt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Lacy St 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
88 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 15
Cycle Length Equipment
Corridor Cross Street Intersection AM MID PM WKND
Maintenance
Responsibility Cabinet Type Software Detection
Bike
Detection CCTV
Power
Backup Comm Other ITS ATMS Status
Garfield St (PHB) 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Co balt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Santiago St 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online 4th Street
French St 100 Free 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Mortimer St 100 Free 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Coba lt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Lacy St 100 Free 100 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online I-5 SB Ramp 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online I-5 NB Ramp 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Cabrillo Park Dr 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Golden Circle Rd 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online McFadden Ave
Newhope St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Riverview Mktpl 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Jackson St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Mohawk Dr 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Wireless Centracs Online Sullivan St 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Center St 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Raitt St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Pacific Ave 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Shelton St 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Flower St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Broadway 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Orange Ave 140 Free 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Maple Bike Trail 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops Yes Copper Centracs Online Standard Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Bluetooth Centracs Online Hathaway St 70 65 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Lyon St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Axis Fiber EVP Centracs Online Metrolink Xing Free Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video No BBS Copper Centracs Online Newhope St
Kent Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Axis Fiber Bluetooth, EVP Centracs Online Camille St Free Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online 5th St 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Cohu Fiber EVP Centracs Online Hazard Ave 140 130 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Raitt St
Civic Center Dr 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online 5th Street Free Free Free Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online Santa Ana Blvd 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Axis BBS Fiber EVP Centracs Online Glenwood Pl 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online St. Gertrude Pl 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online Adams Str 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Wireless EVP Centracs Online Alton Ave 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Video No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Flower St
Washington Ave 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Wireless Centracs Online 10th St (PHB) 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Co balt EOS Video Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online 6th St 100 100 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online 3rd St (PHB) 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EO S Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Walnut St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bishop St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online Highland St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online Wilshire Ave 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber EVP Centracs Online Anahurst Pl 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber EVP Centracs Online Bike Trail 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Other No Copper Centracs Online Alton Ave 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Video Yes Copper Centracs Online EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
89 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 16
Cycle Length Equipment
Corridor Cross Street Intersection AM MID PM WKND
Maintenance
Responsibility Cabinet Type Software Detection
Bike
Detection CCTV
Power
Backup Comm Other ITS ATMS Status
Central Business District Downtown Signals 90 90 90 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Copper Centracs Online Broadway
Santa Clara Ave 100 Free 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Copper Centracs Online Buffalo Ave 100 Free 100 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No UPS Fiber EVP Centracs Online 15th St 140 Free 140 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper EVP Centracs Online Washington Ave 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Fiber Centracs Online 10th St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Fiber Centracs Online 5th St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Fiber Centracs Online 4th St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online 3rd St 90 90 90 90 Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Copper Centracs Online Standard Ave
Chestnut Ave 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) 2070 ASC/3 Loops Yes Copper Centracs Online Bishop St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Coba lt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Wakeham Ave (PHB) 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 Cobalt EOS Video Yes Fiber Centracs Online Hobart St 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana 332 2070 ASC/3 Loops No Copper Centracs Online St. Gertrude Pl 70 Free 70 Free Santa Ana P (TS1) Cobalt EOS Loops No Copper Centracs Online
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
90 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 17
Three-Year Capital, Operations and Maintenance Plans
The City is committed to providing a high level of effort to maintain its traffic signals, signal systems and related communication infrastructure. The effort will include funding for proper maintenance, operations and upgrade of traffic signals to current standard where necessary.
Table 3 (3 Year Outlook - Constrained)
outlines a constrained budget which
includes activities planned for the next
three years that have full funding
identified. Funding includes approved
Project P, Federal and State
allocations identified in the current CIP.
Table 4 (3 Year Outlook -
Unconstrained) lists an unconstrained
budget which includes the constrained
budget as well as unconstrained
projects that could be implemented in
the next three if funding were available.
The 3-year outlook will help identify
preliminary project priorities and
potential multi-agency coordination
opportunities. Expenditures are shown
in year-of-expenditure dollars.
Table 5 (Candidate Signal
Synchronization Project) identifies
planning level capital funding needs for
a full buildout of Santa Ana’s Advance
Traffic Management System network
as shown in Figure 1 of section two of
the LSSP. This is a comprehensive list
of improvements planned without an
identified period.
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
91 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 18
Table 3 – 3 Year Outlook Traffic Signal Synchronization, Funding Needs for Synchronized Operations (City of Santa Ana, Constrained)
Maintenance
Project FY26/27 FY27/28 FY28/29 Total
Traffic Signals
Maintenance $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $3,600,000 Communication
Maintenance $115,000 $115,000 $115,000 $345,000
Traffic Signal Utility $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,050,000 Traffic Signal System
Maintenance $290,000 $290,000 $290,000 $870,000
Subtotal Maintenance $1,955,000 $1,955,000 $1,955,000 $5,865,000 Construction
Project FY26/27 FY27/28 FY28/29 Total
Traffic Signal
Equipment
Replacement
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $450,000
New LT Phasing $700,000 $700,000 $700,000 $2,100,000 4th St TSSP $200,000 $200,000
17th/ Westminster TSSP $500,000 $500,000
Subtotal Construction $1,050,000 $850,000 $1,350,000 $3,250,000 Operations
Project FY26/27 FY27/28 FY28/29 Total
KGG TSSP $12,320 $12,320
Bristol TSSP $13,440 $13,440
4th St TSSP $10,340 $10,340
Subtotal Operations $12,320 $13,440 $10,340 $36,100
TOTAL $3,017,320 $2,818,440 $3,315,340 $9,151,100
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
92 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 19
Table 4 – 3 Year Outlook Traffic Signal Synchronization, Funding Needs for Synchronized Operations (City of Santa Ana, Unconstrained)
Maintenance
Project FY26/27 FY27/28 FY28/29 Total
Traffic Signals
Maintenance $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $1,700,000 $5,100,000 Communication
Maintenance $175,000 $175,000 $175,000 $525,000
Traffic Signal Utility $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $1,200,000 Traffic Signal System
Maintenance $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,050,000
Subtotal Maintenance $2,625,000 $2,625,000 $2,625,000 $7,875,000 Construction
Project FY26/27 FY27/28 FY28/29 Total
Traffic Signal Equipment
Replacement $350,000 $350,000 $350,000 $1,050,000
CCTV Upgrades $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000
Controllers Upgrades $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $300,000 System Detection
Upgrades $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $450,000
Video Detection Upgrades $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $600,000 APS Push Buttons $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $900,000 UPS Upgrades $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $600,000
Fairview St Conduit and
Comm
$700,000 $700,000
Newhope St Conduit and
Comm
$500,000 $500,000
Main St Conduit and
Comm $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000
17th/Westminster Conduit
and Comm $500,000 $500,000
1st St Conduit and Comm $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 Subtotal Construction $1,400,000 $3,600,000 $2,900,000 $7,900,000 Operations
Project FY26/27 FY27/28 FY28/29 Total
Citywide Traffic Signal
Synchronization $1,500,000 $1,500,000
Advance Traffic Signal
Performance Measure $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 Transit Signal Priority $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 Emergency Vehicle Priority $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 Subtotal Operations $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,000,000 $6,000,000 TOTAL $5,525,000 $7,725,000 $8,525,000 $21,775,000
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
93 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 20
Table 5 – LSSP Implementation, Candidate Signal Synchronization Projects with Estimated Costs
Corridor Improvement Summary Estimated
Costs
Westminster Ave/
17th St
Upgrade timing, controllers, CCTV, cabinets, system detection, video detection, communication, active transportation, UPS, travel time system and TMC improvements
$5,000,000
Fairview St
Upgrade timing, controllers, CCTV, cabinets, system detection, video detection, communication, active transportation, UPS, travel time system and TMC improvements
$5,000,000
Raitt St
Upgrade timing, controllers, CCTV, cabinets, system detection, video detection, communication, active transportation, UPS, travel time system and TMC improvements
$2,300,000
Newhope St
Upgrade timing, controllers, CCTV, cabinets, system detection, video detection, communication, active transportation, UPS, travel time system and TMC improvements
$3,500,000
Main St
Upgrade timing, controllers, CCTV, cabinets, system detection, video detection, communication, active transportation, UPS, travel time system and TMC improvements
$3,500,000
Flower St
Upgrade timing, controllers, CCTV, cabinets, system detection, video detection, communication, active transportation, UPS, travel time system and TMC improvements
$3,500,000
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
94 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 21
IV. Traffic Signal Synchronization
Assessment, Review and Revision
Maintaining efficient traffic operations throughout Santa Ana and surrounding area is a core objective of the City’s traffic management program. Signal synchronization is a key strategy in achieving this objective. To support reliable operations, the City regularly repairs, upgrades, and maintains critical components of the traffic signal system, including controllers, cabinets, communication systems, and detection equipment. In addition to synchronization of all the major arterials in the City, the City also collaborates with neighboring agencies to coordinate operations along inter-jurisdictional corridors.
Travel time and stop reduction, average speed and gas savings have been the normal parameters the City used to measure the success of synchronization. The City has supported the use of Corridor Synchronization Performance Index (CSPI) established by OCTA shown in Figure 4 to measure the inter-jurisdiction corridor performance. The CSPI utilizes parameters such as average speed, ratio of green to red signals and stops per mile to compile the score and grade for the entire corridor. The sum of the scores from each of the categories gives the total of the index. The CSPI value is categorized into five levels – Tier I through V. Tier I refers to a CSPI score at or above 80 and indicates very good signal synchronization conditions. Tier II with value of 70 to 80 is considered good progression with few stops and good travel time. Tier III with score 60-70 is considered the baseline for good operational performance. CSPI value ranging from 50 to 60 indicates a problem generally fixable with a low-cost solutions or signal timing modification. A CSPI below 50 however, indicates poor corridor performance thereby necessitating larger scale investigation into corridor operations.
Figure 4- CSPI Score and Description
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
95 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 22
Over the past three years from 2023 to 2026, the City, in cooperation with OCTA and other local agencies, participated in synchronizing several important corridors in the City and adjacent jurisdictions. Many corridors have been previously synchronized and maintained, however due to changes in traffic patterns, periodical re-timing is necessary to maintain progression and reduce delay.
Since 2023, The following corridors were synchronized or currently in the process of implementation:
Synchronization for the First Street-Bolsa Avenue and Tustin Avenue-Rose Drive Corridors were completed in 2024.
Synchronization for the Warner Avenue Corridor was completed in 2025. Synchronization for the MacArthur Boulevard Corridor was completed in 2026. Synchronization for the Edinger Boulevard Corridor was completed in 2026. Synchronization for the Segerstrom Avenue/Dyer Road Corridor was completed in 2026.
A. Performance Results:
The primary objective of improving traffic flow along each synchronized corridor was achieved across all corridors included in recent synchronizations efforts. Improvements were observed in all key performance measures, including reduced travel times, fewer stops, higher average speeds, and improved green-to-red- signal ratios. These enhancements collectively indicate more efficient progression and better overall corridor performance.
A summary of these improvements is shown on Table 6 (Traffic Signal Synchronization Assessment, Review & Revision). These results are based on findings from the ‘Before’ and ‘After’ Studies conducted as part of the Primary Implementation Phase Reports for each project. The assessment breaks down the performance by corridor, direction of travel, and time of day, providing a detailed evaluation of operational changes resulting from the synchronization efforts.
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
96 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 23
Table 6 - Traffic Signal Synchronization Assessment, Review & Revision
Local Agency Corridor Year
Timing
Updated
Timing Update Results
Direction Peak Travel Speed (mph) Greens per Red Stops per Mile CSPI Score CSPI Tier Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Barranca Parkway / Dyer
Road / Muirlands
Boulevard / Segerstrom
Avenue / Slater Avenue
2024
EB
AM 21.6 23.4 1.8 2.8 1.6 1.2 56.0 70.1 4.0 2.0
MD 23.7 26.6 1.8 3.0 1.6 1.2 60.3 77.8 4.0 3.0
PM 19.7 24.5 1.4 2.8 1.7 1.1 49.3 72.9 5.0 2.0
WKND 24.5 26.0 1.9 2.1 1.4 1.3 63.5 67.8 3.0 3.0
WB
AM 23.2 24.8 1.8 2.1 1.5 1.3 59.2 65.9 4.0 3.0
MD 24.2 26.6 2.0 2.6 1.5 1.3 64.5 74.7 3.0 2.0
PM 20.1 20.9 1.5 2.2 1.6 1.3 50.8 61.1 4.0 3.0
WKND 23.7 26.5 1.6 2.7 1.5 1.1 57.8 74.9 4.0 2.0
First Street / Bolsa Avenue 2024
EB
AM 19.0 22.0 1.8 3.2 1.8 1.2 49.8 71.7 5.0 2.0
MD 22.8 24.4 2.9 4.2 1.2 0.9 70.4 86.0 2.0 1.0
PM 19.0 21.4 1.9 3.2 1.6 1.1 51.9 71.1 4.0 2.0
WKND 20.0 23.7 2.2 3.9 1.6 0.9 56.5 83.2 4.0 1.0
WB
AM 21.9 26.1 1.9 4.8 1.6 0.7 57.1 95.4 4.0 1.0
MD 22.6 23.9 1.9 3.7 1.5 0.9 58.7 81.0 4.0 1.0
PM 19.0 22.1 1.5 3.3 1.9 1.1 46.3 73.7 5.0 2.0
WKND 20.5 23.1 1.8 3.7 1.6 1.0 54.0 80.0 4.0 1.0
Tustin A
venue / Rose Drive
2024
NB
AM 24.0 24.5 2.2 2.5 1.4 1.3 65.2 69.2 3.0 3.0
MD 24.4 26.5 2.2 3.7 1.3 0.9 65.9 85.3 3.0 1.0
PM 21.1 22.8 2.0 2.7 1.5 1.2 58.1 69.2 4.0 3.0
WKND 26.1 27.3 2.6 4.0 1.2 0.9 72.3 89.1 2.0 1.0
SB
AM 19.4 23.5 1.6 2.8 1.8 1.3 49.3 70.5 5.0 2.0
MD 24.0 29.1 1.9 4.3 1.5 0.8 61.6 94.5 3.0 1.0
PM 21.8 26.2 2.0 3.0 1.4 1.1 59.4 77.0 4.0 2.0
WKND
23.3 27.4 1.4 3.3 1.8 1.0 53.6 82.4 4.0 1.0
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
97 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 24
Local Agency Corridor Year
Timing
Updated
Timing Update Results
Direction Peak Travel Speed (mph) Greens per Red Stops per Mile CSPI Score CSPI Tier Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Warner Avenue 2025
EB
AM 22.6 25.8 1.8 2.9 1.4 1.0 59.6 76.6 4.0 2.0
MD 27.5 30.2 2.8 3.9 0.9 0.8 79.6 93.4 2.0 1.0
PM 25.3 25.6 2.2 3.0 1.1 0.9 69.7 78.3 3.0 2.0
WKND 28.1 28.8 2.8 2.8 0.9 0.9 81.0 81.6 1.0 1.0
WB
AM 22.3 25.7 1.7 2.8 1.3 0.9 58.7 77.1 4.0 2.0
MD 24.3 30.4 2.0 4.0 1.2 0.7 65.8 95.2 3.0 1.0
PM 20.1 21.7 1.6 2.1 1.5 1.2 52.3 62.1 4.0 3.0
WKND 25.4 28.5 2.5 2.9 1.0 0.9 72.7 82.5 2.0 1.0
Edinger Avenue 2026
EB
AM 18.8 24.2 1.5 4.8 1.5 0.7 50.5 92.5 4.0 1.0
MD 24.6 21.8 1.7 4.5 1.2 0.7 63.6 86.0 3.0 1.0
PM 2O.8 19.6 2.0 4.0 1.3 0.8 59.3 78.9 4.0 2.0
WKND 21.7 21.4 1.1 4.8 1.6 0.7 51.0 88.1 4.0 1.0
WB
AM 21.0 24.0 1.3 4.8 1.4 0.7 52.1 92.1 4.0 1.0
MD 26.2 22.4 2.4 4.8 1.1 0.7 72.9 89.8 2.0 1.0
PM 20.1 18.3 2.5 3.0 1.2 0.9 63.5 67.3 3.0 3.0
WKND 22.6 21.4 1.6 4.5 1.3 0.7 58.8 86.3 4.0 1.0
MacArthur Boulevard 2026
EB
AM 19.5 25.5 2.1 2.6 1.2 1.0 64.3 76.1 4.0 3.0
MD 25.5 28.5 2.8 3.1 1.0 0.9 78.4 83.8 3.0 2.0
PM 18.0 22.5 2.2 2.8 1.2 1.0 63.7 75.4 4.0 3.0
WKND 18.0 24.0 1.2 1.6 1.7 1.4 51.3 62.5 5.0 4.0
WB
AM 19.5 30.0 2.7 3.8 1.0 0.8 71.2 92.8 3.0 1.0
MD 24.0 28.5 2.8 4.2 1.0 0.7 76.9 94.9 3.0 1.0
PM 13.5 24.0 1.7 3.5 1.4 0.8 53.4 83.6 5.0 2.0
WKND 21.0 21.0 2.0 2.1 1.3 1.2 64.0 65.8 4.0 4.0
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
98 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 25
In cooperation with OCTA, the City also plans to adopt and implement a new, data-driven methodology based on probe-vehicle speed data. Under this methodology, average operating speed is compared with the corridor’s free-flow speed to calculate an Adjusted Level of Service (LOS). This metric provides a high-level indication of corridor performance, capturing the effects of travel time, progression quality, and the frequency of stops.
Average travel speed also indirectly reflects fuel consumption and emissions, offering an additional indi cator of operational efficiency.
Corridors operating at speeds closer to free-flow conditions receive higher Adjusted LOS ratings, while those operating at lower speeds indicate reduced coordination efficiency and may warrant signal timing updates or additional review. To ensure consistenc y in evaluating performance, the following Adjusted LOS criteria are applied:
Using these criteria, the City evaluated each synchronized corridor by comparing its average percent of free-flow speed during the AM, Mid-day, and PM peak periods. The results are summarized in Table 7, which assigns an Adjusted Level of Service to each corridor and highlights locations where progression is strong, as well as corridors where reduced travel speeds indicate the need for timing updates or additional operational review. The route number identified in the table corresponds to the OCTA route identification.
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
99 6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 26
Table 7 - Santa Ana 2026 Corridor Synchronization Performance Summary:
Route
Numb
er Route Name
AM MD PM AM MD PM
Route
Length
(mile)
330
GARDEN GROVE BLVD (E) To GOLDENWEST ST to W MEMORY LN (E) From N BRISTOL ST 74.0 67.4 64.5 C D D 7.100
331
W MEMORY LN (W) To N BRISTOL ST to GARDEN GROVE BLVD (W) From GOLDENWEST ST 75.3 66.8 63.5 C D D 7.101
332
E 2ND ST (E) Between ISLAND VILLAGE DR and WESTMINSTER BLVD to E 17TH ST (SE) To EL CAMINO LN 72.7 67.0 64.8 C D D 16.750
333 E 17TH ST (NW) From EL CAMINO LN to E 2ND ST (W) From WESTMINSTER BLVD 75.1 68.4 64.8 C D D 16.735 334 BOLSA AVE (E) Between BOLSA CHICA ST and BOLSA CHICA ST to E 1ST ST (E) 75.5 70.7 69.1 C C D 11.591 335
E 1ST ST (W) From CABRILLO PARK DR to BOLSA AVE (W) Between BOLSA CHICA ST and BOLSA CHICA ST 78.0 72.5 69.0 C C D 11.589
336 EDINGER AVE (E) Between BOLSA CHICA ST and BOLSA CHICA ST to EDINGER AVE (SE) 73.4 68.2 66.3 C D D 14.624 337
EDINGER AVE (NW) From IRVINE CENTER DR to EDINGER AVE (W) Between BOLSA CHICA ST and BOLSA CHICA ST 76.4 71.4 66.6 C C D 14.634 338
WARNER AVE (E) Between PACIFIC COAST HWY and PACIFIC COAST HWY to WARNER AVE (SE) To RED HILL AVE 70.1 65.7 64.9 C D D 13.290
339
WARNER AVE (NW) From RED HILL AVE to WARNER AVE (W) Between PACIFIC COAST HWY and PACIFIC COAST HWY 72.9 66.8 63.8 C D D 13.296
340
W SEGERSTROM AVE (E) Between S HARBOR BLVD and S HARBOR BLVD to E DYER RD (SE) To RED HILL AVE 78.0 75.1 75.1 C C C 4.548
341
E DYER RD (NW) From RED HILL AVE to W SEGERSTROM AVE (W) Between S HARBOR BLVD and S HARBOR BLVD 77.6 71.4 67.9 C C D 4.547
342
TALBERT AVE (SE) Between BEACH BLVD and BEACH BLVD to MACARTHUR BLVD (SW) To E COAST HWY 72.1 66.6 65.4 C D D 14.623
343 MACARTHUR BLVD (NE) to TALBERT AVE (W) Betw een BEACH BLVD and BEACH BLVD 73.6 65.9 62.8 C D D 14.624 366 EUCLID ST (NE) to S EUCLID ST (N) To W IMPERIAL HWY 71.6 65.3 61.3 C D D 15.871 367 S EUCLID ST (S) From W IMPERIAL HWY to EUCLID ST (SW) 72.1 67.8 66.1 C D D 15.862 368 HARBOR BLVD (NW) Between NEWPORT BLVD and NEWPORT BLVD to N HARBOR 70.8 63.8 58.6 C D E 21.561 EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
100
6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 27
Route
Numb
er Route Name
AM MD PM AM MD PM
Route
Length
(mile)
BLVD (NE) To PEPPERTREE DR
369
N HARBOR BLVD (N) to HARBOR BLVD (NW) Between NEWPORT BLVD and NEWPORT BLVD 70.4 65.0 63.6 C D D 21.729
372 FAIRVIEW RD (N) From NEWPORT BLVD to FAIRVIEW ST (N) To GARDEN GROVE BLVD 71.9 66.9 60.2 C D D 8.440 373 FAIRVIEW ST (S) From GARDEN GROVE BLVD to FAIRVIEW RD (S) To NEWPORT BLVD 71.5 70.8 68.9 C C D 8.442 378 BRISTOL ST N (NW) to N BRISTOL ST (N) 72.3 67.0 59.2 C D E 9.124 379 N BRISTOL ST (N) to BRISTOL ST S (SE) 72.1 67.9 63.9 C D D 9.211 382
MAIN ST (NW) Between JAMBOREE RD and JAMBOREE RD to N MAIN ST (N) To W TAFT AVE 69.7 62.5 58.2 D D E 10.386
383
N MAIN ST (S) From W TAFT AVE to MAIN ST (SE) Between JAMBOREE RD and JAMBOREE RD 71.2 66.7 63.9 C D D 10.384
384 S GRAND AVE (NE) From E DYER RD to N KRAEMER BLVD (N) To E LAMBERT RD 72.6 64.7 63.2 C D D 15.038 385 N KRAEMER BLVD (S) From E LAMBERT RD to S GRAND AVE (SW) To E DYER RD 72.3 67.0 66.6 C D D 15.044 386 TUSTIN AVE (N) To W 1ST ST to N ROSE DR (N) From E IMPERIAL HWY 76.0 71.5 68.3 C C D 11.252 387 N ROSE DR (S) To E IMPERIAL HWY to TUSTIN AVE (S) From W 1ST ST 75.9 72.9 72.0 C C C 11.243 447 E 4TH ST (E) From N TUSTIN AVE to TRABUCO RD (E) To MARGUERITE PKWY 68.5 62.8 61.7 D D D 15.132 448 TRABUCO RD (W) From MARGUERITE PKWY to E 4T H ST (W) To N TUSTIN AVE 69.8 63.7 61.8 D D D 15.123 554 S GRAND AVE (NE) From E DYER RD to S GLASSELL ST (N) To E LA VETA AVE 68.1 61.3 59.3 D D E 5.029 555 S GLASSELL ST (S) From E LA VETA AVE to S GRAND AVE (SW) To E DYER RD 67.8 66.1 66.4 D D D 5.029 EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
101
6/2/2026
SANTA ANA LOCAL SIGNAL SYNCHRONIZATION PLAN| 28
B. System Improvements:
In addition to the corridor synchronization,
improvements to the traffic signal system,
communication and monitoring infrastructure
were made along the following corridors to allow
the City to better monitor traffic condition,
manage traffic signals and maintain signal
synchronization.
1. Tustin Ave / Rose Dr Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing fiber
optic cable, installing Ethernet
switches, installing CCTV cameras,
and upgrading traffic signal cabinets.
2. Edinger Ave Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing CCTV
cameras and VDS, installing conduit
and fiber optic cable, installing
Ethernet switches, ATMS License
expansion, and Signal Performance
Measures.
3. Warner Ave Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing CCTV
cameras and VDS, installing conduit
and fiber optic cable, installing
Ethernet switches, installing
Bluetooth travel systems, replacing
traffic signal cabinets, ATMS License
expansion and Signal Performance
Measures.
4. MacArthur Blvd Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing CCTV
cameras and VDS, installing conduit
and fiber optic cable, installing
Ethernet switches, installing
Bluetooth travel systems, replacing
traffic signal cabinets, ATMS License
expansion and Signal Performance
Measures.
5. Segerstrom/Dyer Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing CCTV
cameras and VDS, installing conduit
and fiber optic cable, Ethernet
switches, and Signal Performance
Measures.
6. 1
st St / Bolsa Ave Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing CCTV
cameras and VDS, installing APS,
installing conduit and fiber optic
cable, installing Ethernet switches,
replacing traffic signal cabinets, and
Signal Performance Measures.
7. Kraemer-Glassell-Grand Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing CCTV
cameras and VDS, installing APS,
installing fiber optic cable, installing
Ethernet switches, installing wireless
radios, Signal Performance
Measures, and TMC improvements.
8. McFadden TSP:
Improvements include installing a
cloud-based Transit Signal Priority
(TSP) system with secure controller
communication and centralized
system management at 19
intersections.
9. Bristol Street Corridor:
Improvements include upgrading
controllers to ATC, installing CCTV
and VDS, installing APS, install
Ethernet switches, and TMC
improvements including relocating
and installing equipment into the new
TMC and implementing a new video
wall.
EXHIBIT 4
City Council
18 –
102
6/2/2026
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 19
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
June 2, 2026
TOPIC: Resolution for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Senate Bill 1 Local Streets and Roads Funding Program
AGENDA TITLE
Resolution to Maintain Eligibility for the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Senate Bill 1 Local Streets and Roads, Road Repair and Accountability Act Funding Program (Non-General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adopt a Resolution affirming the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Senate Bill 1 projects list and anticipated Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funding in the amount of $8,847,550, to be submitted to the California Transportation Commission for budgeting the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program and maintaining eligibility for Road Repair and Accountability Act funding.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
In April 2017, California passed Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, which created the State Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) to address basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and safety needs on both the state highway and local streets systems. SB 1 generates revenue from gas taxes to fund the maintenance, repair, and safety improvements on state highways, local streets, and roads. The State Controller deposits various portions of these funds into RMRA and a percentage of these funds are apportioned by formula to eligible cities and counties pursuant to Street and Highways Code (SHC) Section 2032(h). The formula for distribution of RMRA funds is based on a city’s population relative to the total population of all cities in the state of California.
Each year, estimates of RMRA funds are prepared by the California Department of Finance and published by the League of California Cities. On average, the City has
City Council
19 –
1 6/2/2026
Resolution for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Senate Bill 1 Local Streets and Roads Funding Program
June 2, 2026
5 7
8 4
received approximately $8M in RMRA funds annually. There is currently no end date to this funding program.
The City has utilized RMRA funding for various arterial street improvement projects.
Examples of RMRA funded projects include Fairview Street Improvements (South City Limits to Alton), Grand Avenue Rehabilitation (Edinger Ave. to McFadden Ave.), and Bristol Street Rehabilitation (Santa Clara Ave. to Memory Ln.).
During the RMRA program application period each year, local agencies are required to adopt a resolution that includes a list of planned eligible projects that will utilize respective fiscal year RMRA funding and submit the resolution to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) (Exhibit 1). Each proposed RMRA-funded project must be specifically identified and differentiated from other gas tax funding programs.
For fiscal year 2026-27, the City is estimated to receive RMRA funding in the amount of $8,847,550. The City must submit a proposed fiscal year 2026-27 RMRA projects list to the CTC and, as required, provide updates on RMRA funded project progress. The proposed fiscal year 2026-27 projects list must include a project description, specific location, proposed schedule for its completion, and the project’s estimated useful life.
The proposed RMRA funded projects have been incorporated in the proposed fiscal year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program Budget (Exhibit 2). The proposed projects for fiscal year 2026-27 were identified by the City’s Pavement Management Program as high priority to maintain Santa Ana’s Pavement Condition Index (PCI) citywide. Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution recognizing the proposed fiscal year 2026-27 RMRA funded project list.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Transportation Commission’s Annual Reporting Guidelines for Local Streets and Roads Funding, Staff has identified three projects to be funded with anticipated fiscal year 2026-27 RMRA revenues of $8,847,550.
FY26-27 CIP – SB1 Road Repair and Accountability Act Project List Project Location Funding
17th Street Rehabilitation Grand Avenue to Cabrillo Park Drive $4,764,000 Broadway Street
Rehabilitation 17th Street to Mainplace Drive $2,800,000 MacArthur Boulevard
Rehabilitation Harbor Boulevard to Fairview Street $1,283,550 TOTAL $8,847,550
City Council
19 –
2 6/2/2026
Resolution for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Senate Bill 1 Local Streets and Roads Funding Program
June 2, 2026
5 7
8 4
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Resolution and Proposed List of Projects for FY 2026-27
2. FY 2026-27 RMRA CIP Project Worksheets
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director of Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council
19 –
3 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XX
A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND
ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
BE
IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:
A. S
enate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statues of 2017) , was passed by the Legislature and signed into l aw by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi -modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide.
B. S
B 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Santa Ana are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year.
C. T
he City of Santa Ana must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement.
D
. The City will receive an estimated $8,847,550 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2026-27 from SB 1.
E. T
his is the tenth year in which the City of Santa Ana is receiving SB 1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1.
F
. The City used has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into our community’s transportation priorities/the project list.
G. T
he City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the priorities of the community for transportation investment.
EXHIBIT 1
City Council
19 –
4 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XX
H. The funding from SB 1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate three streets/roads throughout the City this year and future streets/roads rehabilitations, bridge projects, and active transportation projects in the future.
I. T he 2023 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City’s streets and roads are in good condition and this revenue will help us maintain the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will allow us the opportunity to enhance our overall streets and roads condition.
J. The SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance, safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting -edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.
Section 2. T
he following previously proposed and adopted project s may also utilize Fiscal Year 2026-27 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in its delivery. With the relisting of this project in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:
Project Name
Location
Description Proposed
Project
Start date
Proposed
Project
Completion
date
Estimated
Useful
Life
17th Street
Grand Ave to Cabrillo Park Drive Road
Rehabilitation -
Grind/Overlay
with associated
concrete work.
7/1/26 12/31/27 20 years
Broadway 17th Street to MainPlace Drive Road
Rehabilitation -
Grind/Overlay
with associated
concrete work.
7/1/26 12/31/27 20 years
MacArthur
Boulevard
Harbor Boulevard to Fairview
Street
Road
Rehabilitation -
Grind/Overlay
with associated
concrete work.
7/1/26 12/31/27 20 years
EXHIBIT 1
City Council
19 –
5 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XX
Section 3. T his Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
AD
OPTED this 2nd day of June, 2026.
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho, City Attorney
By:
Kyle Nellesen
Assistant City Attorney
AYES: C
ouncilmembers
NOES: C
ouncilmembers
ABSTAIN: C
ouncilmembers
NOT PRESENT: C
ouncilmembers _
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby certify the attached Resolution No. 2026 -_____ to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on June 2, 2026.
Date:
City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
EXHIBIT 1
City Council
19 –
6 6/2/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 26/27CIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruction/resurfacing of existing pavement and
replacement/installation of missing or damaged, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, and wheelchair ramps along 17th Street between Grand Avenue and Cabrillo Park Drive.
PROJECT NEED:
This segment of roadway has been identified as a high priority by the City's Pavement Management System. The pavement is deteriorating due to the weather, age, and heavy usage. Some of the adjacent curbs, gutters, driveway approaches, curb ramps, and sidewalks are also in various states of disrepair and require replacement.
PROJECT TITLE:
17th St Rehab: Grand to Cabrillo
Park
PROJECT CATEGORY:
Street Improvements
Arterial Street Rehabilitation
LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:
Public Works CIP Engineering Jason Gabriel, Principal Civil Engineer 17-Apr-2026 PROJECT COSTS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 Construction 4,764,000 - - - - - -
Engineering - - - - - - -
TOTAL 4,764,000 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 RMRA SB1 4,764,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 4,764,000 - - - - - -
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
19 –
7 6/2/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 26/27CIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruction/resurfacing of existing pavement and
replacement/installation of missing or damaged, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, and wheelchair ramps along Broadway Street between 17th Street and Mainplace Drive.
PROJECT NEED:
This segment of roadway has been identified as a high priority by the City's Pavement Management System. The pavement is deteriorating due to the weather, age, and heavy usage. Some of the adjacent curbs, gutters, driveway approaches, curb ramps, and sidewalks are also in various states of disrepair and require replacement.
PROJECT TITLE:
Broadway St Rehab: 17th to
Mainplace
PROJECT CATEGORY:
Street Improvements
Arterial Street Rehabilitation
LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:
Public Works CIP Engineering Alex Bangean, Senior Civil Engineer 17-Apr-2026 PROJECT COSTS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 Construction 2,800,000 - - - - - -
Engineering - - - - - - -
TOTAL 2,800,000 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 RMRA SB1 2,800,000 - - - - - -
TOTAL 2,800,000 - - - - - -
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
19 –
8 6/2/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 26/27CIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Reconstruction/resurfacing of existing pavement and
replacement/installation of missing or damaged, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveway approaches, and wheelchair ramps within along MacArthur Boulevard between Harbor Boulevard and Fairview Street.
PROJECT NEED:
This segment of roadway has been identified as a high priority by the City's Pavement Management System. The pavement is deteriorating due to the weather, age, and heavy usage. Some of the adjacent curbs, gutters, driveway approaches, curb ramps, and sidewalks are also in various states of disrepair and require replacement.
PROJECT TITLE:
MacArthur Blvd Rehab: Harbor to
Fairview
PROJECT CATEGORY:
Street Improvements
Arterial Street Rehabilitation
LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:
Public Works CIP Engineering Gilbert Castillo, Senior Engineer 17-Apr-2026 PROJECT COSTS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 Construction 1,283,550 - - - - - -
Engineering - - - - - - -
TOTAL 1,283,550 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 RMRA SB1 1,283,550 - - - - - -
SELECT STREET
CONSTRUCTION
- - - - - - -
TOTAL 1,283,550 - - - - - -
EXHIBIT 2
City Council
19 –
9 6/2/2026
City Clerk’s Office
www.santa-ana.org/cityclerk
Item # 20
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
June 2, 2026
TOPIC: 2026 General Municipal Election
AGENDA TITLE
November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Approve resolution calling and giving notice of the November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Santa Ana for the election of certain officers;
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA CALLING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS PROVIDED BY THE
PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XII OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
2. Approve resolution requesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors to consolidate the November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026, WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 AND 10418 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE
3. Approve a resolution adopting regulations for candidate statements.
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES
FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE STATEMENTS
SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026
City Council
20 –
1 6/2/2026
2026 General Municipal Election
June 2, 2026
5 7
8 7
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
Section 1201 of the City Charter provides that municipal officers shall be elected at a general municipal election to be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of each even-numbered year, along with the statewide general election. The November 3, 2026 election shall be for the election of a Mayor, for a full two-year term, and for three (3) Councilmember seats, in Ward Nos. 2, 4, and 6, each for a full four-year term.
Pursuant to the Elections Code and City Charter, the three proposed resolutions are required to be adopted by the City Council prior to the election: i) call and give notice of the November 3, 2026 General Municipal Election for the election of certain officers; ii) request the Board of Supervisors consolidate the election with the statewide general election, and iii) adopt regulations for candidate statements.
The nomination/candidate filing period will open at 8:00 a.m. on Monday, July 13, 2026 and close at 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 7, 2026. If an eligible incumbent does not file, the filing period is extended for other candidates for that seat only to 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 12, 2026.
Candidates for Mayor and Councilmember may choose to submit a Candidate Statement to be submitted to the voters as part of the Voter Information Guide and/or posted online.
Submittal of a Candidate Statement is optional; those candidates who choose to submit a statement will be charged the cost of translating, printing, handling, and mailing such statement to voters. The Orange County Registrar of Voters has provided the following estimated costs for the 200-word Candidate Statement:
Position Printed in Voter
Information Guide and
Posted Online
Posted Online Only
Mayor $1,564.85 $461.46
Ward 2 Councilmember $616.35 $461.46
Ward 4 Councilmember $661.32 $461.46
Ward 6 Councilmember $624.09 $461.46
Ballot measures may be placed on the ballot by separate resolution(s), provided the resolution(s) calling the ballot measure(s) election is filed with the Orange County Board of Supervisors and Orange County Registrar of Voters no later than August 7, 2026, but preferably prior to July 17, 2026.
City Council
20 –
2 6/2/2026
2026 General Municipal Election
June 2, 2026
5 7
8 7
FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated cost provided by the Orange County Registrar of Voters for conducting the November 3, 2026 election is $451,000. Funding will be carried forward through Continuing Appropriations. Additional associated costs for public noticing, translations, materials, outreach, etc. are included in the City Clerk’s proposed FY2026/27 General Fund budget, which is being brought forward separately for City Council’s consideration.
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Resolution – Calling Election
2. Resolution – Requesting Consolidation
3. Resolution – Candidate Statement Regulation
Submitted By: Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council
20 –
3 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA CALLING FOR AND GIVING NOTICE OF A
GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION T O BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2026 , FOR THE ELECTION OF
CERTAIN OFFICERS AS PROVIDED BY THE PROVISIONS
OF ARTICLE XII OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA
WHEREAS, under the provisions of Article XII of the Charter of the City of Santa Ana, a General Municipal Election shall be held on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 for the election of municipal officers.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of Article XII of the Charter of the City of Santa Ana, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Santa Ana, California, on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing a Mayor for the full term of two years, and three Members of the City Council, one member to represent each of the following wards: Ward 2, Ward 4, and Ward 6, each for the full term of four years.
Section 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law.
Section 3. That the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to coordinate with the County of Orange Registrar of Voters to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.
Section 4. That the vote centers for the election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the vote centers shall be closed, pursuant to Elections Code §10242, except as provided in §§14212, 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California.
Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.
Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election in time, form, and manner as required by law.
City Council
20 –
4 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
ADOPTED this ____ day of June, 2026.
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By:
Melissa M. Crosthwaite
Senior Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2026 -XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _____________________, 2026.
Date:
Jennifer L. Hall
City Clerk, Elections Official
City of Santa Ana
City Council
20 –
5 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA REQUESTING THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO
CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL E LECTION TO
BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 3, 2026, WITH THE STATEWIDE
GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 10403 AND 10418 OF THE
ELECTIONS CODE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Santa Ana called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 3, 2026, for the purpose of the election of a Mayor, for a full term of two (2) years, and three (3) Members of the City Council, one member to represent each of the following wards: Ward 2, Ward 4, and Ward 6, each for a full term of four (4) years; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the city the precincts, vote centers, and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the county election department of the County of Orange canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That pur suant to the requirements of § §10403 and 10418 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 3, 2026 , for the purpose of the election of a Mayor and three (3) Members of the City Council, one member to represent each of the following wards: Ward 2, Ward 4, and Ward 6.
Section 2. That the county election department is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal El ection pursuant to the provisions of Elections Code §10411. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. The election will be held and conducted in accordance with the provisions of law regulating the statewide election.
Section 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the county election department to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.
City Council
20 –
6 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Section 4. That the City of Santa Ana recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs.
Section 5. That the City acknowledges that the consolidated election requested by this Reso lution will be held and conducted in the manner prescribed by California Elections Code §10418 and, to the extent that anything in this Resolution shall conflict with such provisions, the provisions of Elections Code §10418 shall control and supersede such inconsistent provision(s).
Section 6. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the county election department of the County of Orange.
Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
ADOPTED this ____ day of June, 2026.
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By:
Melissa M. Crosthwaite
Senior Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
City Council
20 –
7 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2026 -XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _____________________, 2026.
Date:
Jennifer L. Hall
City Clerk, Elections Official
City of Santa Ana
City Council
20 –
8 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR
CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO
CANDIDATE STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS
AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER
3, 2026
WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidate’s statement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS.
That pursuant to §13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an Election to be held in the City of Santa Ana on November 3, 2026 may prepare a candidate’s statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age, and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate themselves. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed in typewritten form in the office of the City Clerk at the same time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working date after the close of the nomination period, except as provided in §13309 of the Elections Code of the State of California.
Section 2. FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY.
A. Pursuant to the Federal Voting Rights Act, candidate statements will be translated into all languages required by the County of Orange. The County is required to translate candidate statements into the following languages:
Spanish, Vietnamese, Chinese, Korean.
B. The Orange County Registrar of Voters shall have all candidate statements translated into the languages specified in Section 2.A. above, print all translations of the candidate statements in the voter information guid e, and these translations shall be made available at all vote centers and in the City Clerk’s office, upon request.
City Council
20 –
9 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Section 3. PAYMENT.
The City Clerk shall provide the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate statements filed pursuant to this resolution, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 19 65 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the local agency their pro rata share as a condition of having their statement included in the voter information guide. The City Clerk is not bound by the estimate, and may, on a pro rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the City Clerk may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the City Clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days following receipt of an invoice from the County of Orange for election services rendered.
The Orange County Registrar of Voters has provided the following estimated cost of translating, posting, printing, handling, and mailing of 200 -word candidate statements for candidates for elective office in the City of Santa Ana:
Position Printed in Voter
Information Guide and
Posted Online
Posted Online Only
Mayor $1,564.85 $461.46
Ward 2 Councilmember $616.35 $461.46
Ward 4 Councilmember $661.32 $461.46
Ward 6 Councilmember $624.09 $461.46
Section 4. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS.
No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package/voter information guide.
Section 5. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating papers are issued.
Section 6. That all previous resolutions establishing Council policy on payment for candidate statements are repealed.
Section 7. That this Resolution shall apply only to the e lection to be held on November 3, 2026.
Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council and the City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
ADOPTED this ____ day of June, 2026.
City Council
20 –
10 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By:
Melissa M. Crosthwaite
Senior Assistant City Attorney
AYES: Councilmembers
NOES: Councilmembers
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2026 -XXX to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on _____________________, 2026.
Date:
Jennifer L. Hall
City Clerk, Elections Official
City of Santa Ana
City Council
20 –
11 6/2/2026
City Clerk’s Office
www.santa-ana.org/cityclerk
Item # 21
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
June 2, 2026
TOPIC: Implementation of Brown Act Changes Pursuant to SB 707
AGENDA TITLE
Implementation of Brown Act Changes Pursuant to SB 707 Including Adoption of a Disruption Policy for Telephonic or Internet Service, Proposed Changes to the City Council's Rules and Procedures Resolution and Teleconferencing Policy, and Outreach Efforts to Encourage Participation in City Council Meetings
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Receive and file information on Senate Bill (SB) 707 regarding changes to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act); and
2. Adopt a resolution amending the Council Rules and Procedures to add provisions addressing disruptions to telephonic or internet service and use of signs at City Council meetings, as well as clarifying public comment, presentation, and translation procedures; and
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AMENDING THE COUNCIL RULES AND
PROCEDURES TO ADD PROVISIONS ADDRESSING DISRUPTIONS TO
TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE CONSISTENT WITH SENATE BILL 707 (“SB 707”) AND RULES FOR SIGNS AT COUNCIL MEETINGS, CLARIFY
PUBLIC COMMENT, PRESENTATION, AND TRANSLATION PROCEDURES, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 2025-004
3. Adopt a resolution approving a revised Teleconferencing Policy; and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX entitled A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA ADOPTING A REVISED TELECONFERENCING POLICY
4. Approve outreach efforts to encourage participation in City Council meetings pursuant to Government Code §54953.4.
City Council
21 –
1 6/2/2026
Implementation of Brown Act Changes Pursuant to SB 707
June 2, 2026
5 7
9 8
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
Senate Bill 707 (SB 707) amended the Brown Act (Government Code §§54950-54963) to diversify and increase public engagement during local government meetings of legislative bodies by updating teleconferencing and accessibility requirements. By July 1, 2026, legislative bodies must adopt policies addressing technology disruptions and defining reasonable efforts for outreach to encourage public participation, particularly among underrepresented and non-English-speaking communities.
Below is a summary of key provisions with notable changes under SB 707:
Two-Way Remote Attendance and Disruption Procedures
SB 707 requires “eligible legislative bodies” (starting July 1, 2026 through January 1, 2030) to offer two-way public access for meetings via telephonic or audiovisual platforms (e.g., Zoom). “Eligible legislative bodies” is defined as City Councils with populations of greater than 30,000 or City Councils in counties with populations of greater than 600,000. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana meets these population criteria and is, thereby, subject to the requirements outlined in the statute.
As the City of Santa Ana has provided remote access to City Council meetings via Zoom Webinar since 2020, it already meets the requirements for two-way public access.
Government Code §54953.4 requires the City Council to adopt, by July 1, 2026, a technology disruption policy. The policy must address procedures for responding to disruptions of telephonic or internet service during a meeting and the efforts the legislative body will make to restore service. In lieu of creating a separate, stand-alone policy, the required technology disruption policy language has been added to the Resolution for Council Rules and Procedures (Exhibit 2).
The statute requires that if a disruption occurs that prevents members of the public form observing or participating in a City Council meeting through the two-way telephonic or audiovisual platform, the City Council must recess the open session for at least one hour and make a good faith effort to restore service. During this time, City Council may meet in Closed Session, as permitted by law. The meeting shall remain in recess for at least one hour or until service is restored, whichever is sooner. Good faith efforts include: (1) troubleshooting platform or teleconferencing software, (2) resetting or replacing audiovisual equipment, (3) attempting alternative connection methods, (4) contacting necessary support staff or service providers, and/or (5) switching to back-up equipment or platforms, if available. Minutes of the meeting shall document the time and nature of any disruption and the efforts made to restore access. If service has not been
City Council
21 –
2 6/2/2026
Implementation of Brown Act Changes Pursuant to SB 707
June 2, 2026
5 7
9 8
restored after one hour of good faith efforts, the Council, by roll call vote, shall extend the recess to continue efforts to restore service, adjourn the meeting, or adopt findings that the City made good faith efforts to restore service and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote access.
Teleconferencing Provisions and Policy
SB 707 revised the regulations for teleconference participation by members of the legislative body. The City’s previous Teleconferencing Policy, adopted July 18, 2023, expired on January 1, 2026. Since that time, the teleconferencing provisions of the Brown Act have been in effect. The proposed Teleconferencing Policy (Exhibit 4) incorporates the Brown Act’s teleconferencing provisions specifically for the City.
Traditional teleconferencing procedures continue in effect. Changes were made to the procedures for participating via teleconference to accommodate City Councilmembers under the Americans with Disabilities Act, during a proclaimed state of emergency, and expanding the qualifications to teleconference using the “Just Cause” provisions. “Just Cause” remote participation has been expanded to now include childcare responsibilities, illness, family emergencies, travel on official business, or military service obligations. If the legislative body regularly meets twice per month, remote participation by a Councilmember is limited to five meetings annually.
Language Access
From July 1, 2026 to January 1, 2030, certain legislative bodies must translate their meeting agendas into any language spoken by 20% of more of the local population that speaks English less than “very well,” based on the US. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey data. The City of Santa Ana meets this 20% threshold for Spanish.
City Council meeting agendas, commencing July 1, 2026, will be translated into Spanish and posted physically outside City Hall and online. Agencies must also provide a freely- accessibly physical location (e.g., bulletin board or similar) near where the agenda is posted to allow the public to post their own translated versions of the agenda. Such posting location will be in place prior to July 1, 2026 and will be limited to agenda translations only. Any other materials will be removed. The City is not responsible for the content or accuracy of any publically-posted translation.
The City exceeds requirements for simultaneous language interpretation by providing Spanish interpretation and live-streaming at each City Council meeting. In addition, the City shall reasonably assist members of the public who wish to translate/interpret in other language(s) during a meeting.
Local agencies must also take reasonable steps to help increase participation from underrepresented groups, including people who do not speak English very well. This
City Council
21 –
3 6/2/2026
Implementation of Brown Act Changes Pursuant to SB 707
June 2, 2026
5 7
9 8
can include working with community organizations, sharing agendas and documents online, and helping people who bring their own interpreters (such as giving them space or allowing extra time for interpretation). Webpages about public meetings must also be translated into languages spoken by at least 20% of the applicable population that speaks English less than “very well,” according to the American Community Survey data. The City of Santa Ana’s website includes translation tools to accommodate approximately 100 different languages. Additionally, specific information on the agenda pages will be posted in both English and Spanish, eliminating the need to use the available translation tools.
Reasonable Efforts for Outreach
Government Code §54953.4 requires the City Council to determine and approve what constitutes “reasonable efforts” to encourage participation in City Council meetings, particularly among underrepresented communities and non-English-speaking communities.
Exhibit 5 details the City’s approach to outreach, which may include inviting participation in City Council meetings from media organizations serving the city, including those serving non-English-speaking communities, as well as civic, neighborhood, community- based, civil rights, and good government organizations.
The statute provides the City Council with broad discretion in defining these reasonable efforts and clarifies that failure to provide notice to any specific group does not create a basis for legal action. The proposed approach is intended to provide flexibility while supporting expanded public awareness and participation.
In addition, SB 707 provides specific guidelines and actions for local agencies to encourage residents to participate in public meetings, including:
Provide a system for electronically accepting and fulfilling requests for meeting agendas. This is satisfied through the City’s online Subscribe function. Have an accessible internet webpage dedicated to information concerning public meetings and how members of the public may participate, including a link to the page on the agency’s home page. This is satisfied by a link to “Watch a public meeting” on the City’s home page.
Other Considerations
While reviewing the City Council Rules and Procedures Resolution, additional revisions are suggested to provide clarity and address safety concerns. Section 3 of the resolution includes revisions to the sections of the agenda to match current practice and addresses how presentations may be requested (one per Councilmember per meeting) and limiting acceptance timeframes to one speaker for a maximum of three minutes.
Section 5 of the resolution clarifies time limits for City Council discussions (three
City Council
21 –
4 6/2/2026
Implementation of Brown Act Changes Pursuant to SB 707
June 2, 2026
5 7
9 8
minutes) and addresses the public comment procedures for submitting “Request to Speak” cards and how in-person and remote public speakers will be called. Request to Speak cards shall be submitted no later than the agendized start time of any Closed Session meeting for items to be considered during Closed Session and no later than 5:45 P.M., or upon the call to order, whichever is later, for any regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Remote speakers shall follow the instructions on the agenda and as stated by the presiding officer or City Clerk at the beginning of each meeting. The timeframe for submitting Request to Speak cards for any adjourned, special, or emergency meeting will be noted on the posted agenda for such meeting, and separate public comment periods will be held for meetings of related entities (e.g., Housing Authority).
To comply with equal time provisions within Government Code §54953.4(b)(1)(B)(i), if a maximum time limit is set for public comments, such time period shall be divided equally between in-person and remote speakers, as necessary, with remaining time for either group (if any) re-allocated to the other if any speakers remain who have not yet been heard.
For safety considerations while preserving First Amendment rights of free speech, language has been added to Section 5(j) to prohibit any stick, post, pole, or similar item being affixed to any sign.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Implementation of any required elements will be absorbed within the City Clerk’s Office’s existing and proposed budgets.
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Rules and Procedures Resolution - red-lined
2. Rules and Procedures - for adoption
3. Teleconferencing Policy – red-lined
4. Resolution Adopting Teleconferencing Policy
5. Outreach Efforts
Submitted By: Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council
21 –
5 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AMENDING THE COUNCIL RULES AND
PROCEDURES TO ADD PROVISIONS ADDRESSING
DISRUPTIONS TO TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE
CONSISTENT WITH SENATE BILL 707 (“SB 707”) AND
RULES FOR SIGN S AT COUNCIL MEETINGS , CLARIFY
PUBLIC COMMENT, PRESENTATION, AND TRANSLATION
PROCEDURES, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-
004.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows:
A. Section 409 of the City Charter and Sections 2 -100 et seq. of Santa Ana Municipal Code call for the City Council to adopt rules and procedures for the scheduling and conducting of meetings of the City Council.
B. The Ralph M. Brown Act found at Chapter 9, Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code beginning with Section 54950 (the "Brown Act") sets forth statewide standards for meetings of local agencies including the Santa Ana City Council.
C. Resolution No. 2025-004 addresses City Council meetings time and place, Agendas, Rules of Procedures, Decorum, Time limits and other regulations for speaking , Teleconferencing, and Audio, Video and Photographic Recording.
D. The City Council desires to amend the City Council Rules and Procedures to address disruptions to telephonic and internet service consistent with the requirements of Senate Bill 707 (“SB 707”) (2025), to add rules regarding signs at Council meetings, and to clarify public comment, presentation, and translation procedures.
Section 2. City Council meetings, time, and place.
(a) Regular meetings of the City Council shall be on the first and third Tuesdays of each month beginning on January 1, 2014. The meeting shall begin between the hours of 3:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. for Closed Session followed by the Regular Open Meeting at 5:30 P.M., with the specific time legally noticed and posted on the agenda. The City Council shall publicly
City Council
21 –
6 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
convene the meeting and then recess to conduct closed or executive sessions. Regular meetings of the City Council shall be convened in the Council Chamber or as noted on the agenda and at the time specified on the agenda. After being convened, all meetings may be adjourned to such other place or places as the City Council may order.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, any regular meeting of the Council may be set, canceled, or rescheduled to a different date, time, or location by resolution duly adopted by the affirmative votes of a majority of the City Council or by any other manner as provided by law.
The date, time, and location of any meeting set or rescheduled to a different date, time, or location shall be noticed and posted in the manner provided by law.
(c) Special meetings of the City Council may be held at such locations as stated in the action calling such meetings and otherwise in conformance with the Brown Act. A special meeting may be called by the Mayor or the Mayor Pro Tem, in the Mayor’s noticed absence, by either of them contacting the City Clerk and requesting orally or in writing the call of a special meeting. A majority of the members of the City Council can also call a special meeting by delivering a written notice to the City Clerk of a request for a special meeting. Upon receiving a request from the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or a majority of the City Council, the City Clerk shall notice the special meeting.
(d) All meetings are scheduled to terminate at 11:59 P.M. on the same day it began. At 11:00 P.M., the City Council shall determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 11:59 P.M., and will continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future City Council meeting. A majority vote of the Council is required to extend a meeting beyond 11:59 P.M. to discuss specified items.
Section 3. Agenda.
(a) The City Clerk shall prepare an agenda for each regular and special meeting of the City Council containing all items known by such officer to be considered. The order of placing items on the agenda prior to posting shall be at the discretion of the City Manager, in consultation with the Mayor. The agenda shall contain such information as required by the Brown Act. In addition, the agenda shall contain the following sections to provide for reporting by the City Council: AB1234 reports, Council Committee reports, and Regional Agency reports.: Presentations, Council Comments (including AB1234 reporting), Consent Calendar, Business Calendar, Public Hearing, Work Study Sessions, and Councilmember-Requested Items. (b) Presentations. Each Councilmember has the opportunity to request a maximum of one (1) ceremonial presentation per City Council meeting.
City Council
21 –
7 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Recipients of such presentations shall be limited to one speaker accepting such recognition and shall limit their comments to no more than three (3) minutes.
Section 4. Rules of Procedure.
Procedures before the City Council shall be governed by the most current edition of Rosenberg’s Rules of Order. Application of such procedures shall be vested in the sound discretion of the presiding officer.
Section 5. Decorum; Time limits and other regulations for speaking. (a) The City Council shall preserve decorum and an orderly procedure during debate. Councilmembers desiring to speak shall seek recognition from the presiding officer. Upon being recognized, a Councilmember shall confine their comments to the questions under debate. A Councilmember, once recognized, should not be interrupted unless a point of order is raised by another member. The presiding officer should not recognize a Councilmember to speak who has already spoken on a matter under debate until all other Councilmembers who wish to be heard have spoken. A Councilmember should limit them selfthemselves to three (3) minutes at any one time without permission of the presiding officer. At the end of each meeting,During the Council Comments portion of the agenda, the presiding officer shall recognize each Councilmember who may speak up to three (3) minutes on matters of public or community interest.
(b) The agenda for all regular meetings of the City Council shall provide members of the public the opportunity to address the City Council on agendized matters and non-agendized matters as required by the Brown Act. All requests to speak shall be submitted in writing to the City Clerk via a “Request to Speak” card for in-person speakers and by “Raising Hand” or other electronic indicator for remote speakers.
Request to Speak cards shall be submitted no later than the agendized start time of any Closed Session meeting for items to be considered during Closed Session and no later than 5:45 P.M., or upon the call to order, whichever is later, for any regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Remote speakers shall follow the instructions noted on the agenda and as provided by the presiding officer or City Clerk at the beginning of each meeting. No such requests shall be accepted after the public comment session begins without permission of the presiding officer. The agendas for adjourned, special, and emergency meetings of the City Council shall provide for public comment as provided in the Brown Act. The timeframe for submitting Request to Speak cards for any adjourned, special, or emergency meeting will be noted on the posted agenda for such meeting. (c) Subject to (d) below, members of the public shall be given a total of three (3) minutes to: (i) address the City Council on any and all matters contained on the City Council agenda, as well as the agendas of any of the City's related entities, such as the Successor Agency (formerly the Community Redevelopment Agency) or the Housing
City Council
21 –
8 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Authority, if those entities have meetings scheduled at the same time, and/or (ii) address any matters of public interest provided that they are within the jurisdiction or official business of the City of Santa Ana. Separately, members of the public shall be given a total of three (3) minutes to address each or any of the City’s related entities (Housing Authority, Successor Agency, Financing Authority, etc.) if/when they have noticed meeting agendas. The presiding officer shall have the discretion to reduce and also to increase the time allotted to speakers. The City Council may, by majority vote, address/revise the reduced or increased time allotted to speakers. (d) For general public hearings, members of the public shall be given three (3) minutes to address the City Council for each duly noticed hearing, unless continued prior to taking testimony.
i. For public hearings related to land use, entitlements, or appeals, the applicant/appellant and/or their representative(s) whose matter is the subject of the public hearing shall be given ten (10) minutes for their initial presentation.
Members of the public shall be given three (3) minutes to address the City Council on the subject of the public hearing. The applicant/appellant and or their representative(s) shall be given reasonable time for rebuttal comments. (e) Upon being recognized by the presiding officer, a speaker should step to the designated speaker location, state their name and address for the record, identify the matter by agenda designation (if applicable), and direct remarks to the City Council as a body and not to any individual member thereof. A speaker shall not be denied an opportunity to speak if they do not wish to state their name and address for the record.
No person other than members of the City Council and the person having the floor may be permitted to enter into the discussion without permission of the presiding officer. (f) It shall be within the sound discretion of the presiding officer to set a maximum time for public comment. In setting any limit, the presiding officer shall take into consideration the level of public interest in the matters in question, the length of the meeting, and the need to provide for an orderly and effective meeting. As a means of limiting time while maximizing the public's opportunity to address the City Council, if a group of people seeks to address the City Council on the same matter or topic, the presiding officer may request the group to designate a spokesperson or limited number of speakers to address the City Council. In-person speakers will be called to address the City Council first, followed by those attending remotely. If a maximum time is set for public comment, such time shall be divided equally between in-person and remote speakers, as necessary, with remaining time for either group (if any) re-allocated to the other if any speakers remain who have not yet been heard within the maximum time set. (g) The following rules shall apply to all persons addressing the City Council.
All speakers are requested to:
• direct all testimony to the City Council or the presiding officer and not individual Councilmembers,
City Council
21 –
9 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
• when speaking on agenda matters, limit comments to the agenda item(s), • when speaking on non-agenda matters, limit comments to matters within the jurisdiction or official business of the City of Santa Ana, and, • refrain from profane language, racial epitaphs, and libelous or slanderous statements that disturb the decorum of the meeting.
(h) Use of City equipment for video or audio presentations by a speaker shall be prohibited. However, nothing contained herein shall prohibit a speaker from making a presentation (including photographs, diagrams, or using other audio or visual means ) to the City Council during such speaker’s public comments. (i) The presiding officer shall have the power and responsibility to enforce decorum and order of the meeting as set forth in Section 2-104(c). Among other means of enforcement, the presiding officer may order the podium microphone turned off and/or video broadcast interrupted when the presiding officer has determined that an individual or group has disrupted the meeting, or the individual or group has exceeded their allotted time to speak without permission of the presiding officer. (j) All cell phones, pagers, or electronic devices belonging to the public, press, or personnel that may be disruptive must be placed on vibrate mode/quiet or be turned off while a meeting is in session. Members of the public may bring signs into the Council Chambers so long they do not obstruct the view of other attendees or constitute a disruption of the meeting, in accordance with the following restriction: (i) No stick, post, pole or other item may be attached to the sign.
Section 6. Teleconferencing.
Remote participation in a City Council meeting shall be governed by the teleconferencing provisions set forth in the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code Section 54950, et seq.) and by a Teleconferencing Policy duly adopted by the City Council.
Section 7. Audio, Video, and Photographic Recording.
(a) As set forth in the Brown Act, any person attending an open session of a City Council Meeting shall have the right to record the proceedings with an audio or video recorder or camera unless the City Council by majority vote determines that the recording cannot continue without noise, illumination, or obstruction of view that constitutes, or would constitute, a persistent disruption to the meeting.
City Council
21 –
10 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
(b) No person shall obstruct the aisles, entrances, or exits of the Council Chambers.
Section 8. Disruption of Telephonic or Internet Service. (a) Disruption Generally. In accordance with the requirements contained in SB 707 and to ensure transparency, public participation and continuation of government during technological disruptions, if a disruption of telephonic or internet service occurs during a meeting subject to the Brown Act that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting via the two-way telephonic service or two-way audiovisual platform, as defined by the Brown Act, the City Council shall follow the procedures outlined herein. (a)(b) Recess. Upon the presiding officer’s awareness of a technological disruption that prevents members of the public from attending or observing a meeting remotely, the presiding officer shall announce the disruption to the public. The presiding officer shall then call for a recess of the open session or convene the legislative body in closed session, consistent with the Brown Act.
Staff will then begin a good faith attempt to diagnose and restore the disrupted service. The meeting shall remain in recess for at least one (1) hour or until service is restored, whichever is sooner. (c) Good Faith Efforts to Restore Disrupted Service. City shall make good faith efforts to restore disrupted service by any of the following means: (1) troubleshooting platform or teleconferencing software, (2) resetting or replacing audiovisual equipment, (3) attempting alternative connection methods, (4) contacting necessary support staff or service providers, and/or (5) switching to back-up equipment or platforms, if available. The City Clerk or their designee shall document the good faith efforts undertaken in the Minutes. Minutes shall also reflect the nature and time of the disruption, the time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable), and the finding required by SB 707, as delineated in (e) below.
(d) Reconvening. If service has been restored during the one (1) hour of good faith effort being made, the meeting may be reconvened. If service has not been restored after one (1) hour of good faith effort, the City Council may: (1) adjourn the meeting, (2) extend the recess to allow staff more time to make a good faith effort to restore remote access service, or (32) continue the meeting in open session by adopting, by roll call vote, the finding contained in (e), below. Adoption of this finding shall be made by rollcall vote.
City Council
21 –
11 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
(e) Finding. A meeting may be reconvened during a disruption of service if the following finding can be made: The City has made good faith efforts to restore telephonic or internet service in accordance with its adopted policy, and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote access.
(f) Exceptions. This Section 8 shall not apply to a meeting held for the following:
a. Attend a judicial or administrative proceeding to which the local agency is a party.
b. Inspect real or personal property provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the real or personal property. c. Meet with elected or appointed officials of the United States or the State of California, solely to discuss a legislative or regulatory issue affecting the local agency and over which the federal or state officials have jurisdiction.
d. Meet with elected or appointed officials of the United States or the State of California, solely to discuss a legislative or regulatory issue affecting the local agency and over which the federal or state officials have jurisdiction.
e. Meet in or nearby a facility owned by the agency, provided that the topic of the meeting is limited to items directly related to the facility. f. Meet in an emergency situation, as defined in the Brown Act. (g) This policy covers disruption in service for the two-way telephonic or two-way audiovisual platforms only. The City may provide additional broadcast streams of the meeting through third party platforms (such as YouTube).
These streams are provided as a convenience to the public and are not considered the City’s official remote access service for purposes of this Policy. A disruption of a third-party stream alone does not constitute a disruption in telephonic or internet service.
Section 9. Interpretation and Translation.
(a) The City provides Spanish interpretation at all City Council meetings.
Provision of such interpretation services may include in-person services, remote services, digital or technology-based services, and may be either simultaneously or consecutively provided. Requests for other languages shall be made to the City Clerk at least 48 prior to a scheduled meeting. (a)(b) The City shall reasonably assist members of the public who wish to translate a meeting into any language or wish to receive interpretation from another member of the public, as long as the interpretation is not disrupting to
City Council
21 –
12 6/2/2026
the meeting. By way of example, assistance to members of the public pursuant to this subsection and the Brown Act include: arranging space for one or more interpreters at the meeting location, allowing extra time during the meeting for interpretation to occur, and ensuring participants may utilize their personal equipment or reasonably access facilities for participants to access commercially available interpretation services.
(c) Agendas shall be translated into all applicable languages and posted in accordance with the Brown Act.
Section 10. The provisions of Sections 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this resolution shall apply to meetings of committees of the City Council, as may be modified from time to time by such committees.
Section 11. This Resolution shall supersede Resolution No. 2025-004 and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council. The City Clerk shall attest to and certify the vote adopting this Resolution.
ADOPTED this ____ day of June, 2026.
___________________________
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Sonia R. Carvalho
City Attorney
By: __________________
Melissa M. Crosthwaite
Senior Assistant City Attorney
Councilmembers: AYES:
NOES:
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
Councilmembers
City Council
21 –
13 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers
NOT PRESENT: Councilmembers
CERTIFICATE OF ATTESTATION AND ORIGINALITY
I, Jennifer Hall, City Clerk, do hereby attest to and certify the attached Resolution No. 2026- ___ to be the original resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on June 2026.
Date: ___________________ ____________________________ City Clerk
City of Santa Ana
City Council
21 –
14 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-XXX
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA AMENDING THE COUNCIL RULES AND
PROCEDURES TO ADD PROVISIONS ADDRESSING
DISRUPTIONS TO TELEPHONIC OR INTERNET SERVICE
CONSISTENT WITH SENATE BILL 707 (“SB 707”) AND
RULES FOR SIGN S AT COUNCIL MEETINGS , CLARIFY
PUBLIC COMMENT, PRESENTATION, AND TRANSLATION
PROCEDURES, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 20 25-
004.
BE IT RESOLVED BY TH E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines, and declares as follows:
A. Section 409 of the City Charter and Sections 2 -100 et seq. of Santa Ana Municipal Code call for the City Council to adopt rules and procedures for the scheduling and conducting of meetings of the City Council.
B. The Ralph M. Brown Act found at Chapter 9, Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code beginning with Section 54950 ( the "Brown Act") sets forth statewide standards for meetings of local agencies including the Santa Ana City Council.
C. Resolution No. 2025-004 addresses City Council meetings time and place, Agendas, Rules of Procedures, Decorum, Time limits and other regulations for speaking , Teleconferencing, and Audio, Video and Photographic Recording.
D. The City Council desires to amend the City Council Rules and Procedures to address disruptions to telephonic and internet service consistent with the requirements of Senate Bill 707 (“SB 707”) (2025), to add rules regarding signs at Council meetings, and to clarify public comment, presentation, and translation procedures.
Section 2. City Council meetings, time, and place.
(a) Regular meetings of the City Council shall be on the first and third Tuesdays of each month beginning on January 1, 2014. The meeting shall begin between the hours of 3:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. for Closed Session followed by the Regular Open Meeting at 5:30 P.M., with the specific time legally noticed and posted on the agenda. The City Council shall publicly convene the meeting and then recess to conduct closed or executive
City Council
21 –
15 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXXX
sessions. Regular meetings of the City Council shall be convened in the Council Chamber or as noted on the agenda and at the time specified on the agenda. After being convened, all meetings may be adjourned to such other place or places as the City Council may order.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution, any regular meeting of the Council may be set, canceled, or rescheduled to a different date, time, or location by resolution duly adopted by the affirmative votes of a majority of the City Council or by any other manner as provided by law.
The date, time, and location of any meeting set or rescheduled to a different date, time, or location shall be noticed and posted in the manner provided by law.
(c) Special meetings of the City Council may be held at such locations as stated in the action calling such meetings and otherwise in conformance with the Brown Act. A special meeting may be called by the Mayor or the Mayor Pro Tem, in the Mayor’s noticed absence, by either of them contacting the City Clerk and requesting orally or in writing the call of a special meeting. A majority of the members of the City Council can also call a special meeting by delivering a written notice to the City Clerk of a request for a special meeting. Upon receiving a request from the Mayor, Mayor Pro Tem, or a majority of the City Council, the City Clerk shall notice the special meeting.
(d) All meetings are scheduled to terminate at 11:59 P.M. on the same day it began. At 11:00 P.M., the City Council shall determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 11:59 P.M., and will continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future City Council meeting. A majority vote of the Council is required to extend a meeting beyond 11:59 P.M. to discuss specified items.
Section 3. Agenda.
(a) The City Clerk shall prepare an agenda for each regular and special meeting of the City Council containing all items known by such officer to be considered. The order of placing items on the agenda prior to posting shall be at the discretion of the City Manager, in consultation with the Mayor. The agenda shall contain such information as required by the Brown Act. In addition, the agenda shall contain the following sections: Presentations, Council Comments (including AB1234 reporting), Consent Calendar, Business Calendar, Public Hearing, Work Study Sessions, and Councilmember-Requested Items.
(b) Presentations. Each Councilmember has the opportunity to request a maximum of one (1) ceremonial presentation per City Council meeting.
Recipients of such presentations shall be limited to one speaker accepting
City Council
21 –
16 6/2/2026
Resolution No. 2026-XXX