Agenda packet — Santa Ana City Council, July 21, 2026 (part 2 of 5)

2 7
6 6
7 Finding City Position
(1 or 2)*
Response to Finding
infrastructure constraints, environmental factors, and
public health and safety requirements.
successfully leveraged proactive planning to remain on track to meet and exceed its specific housing unit targets, these outcomes have strained municipal staff resources and forced the City to navigate the unique complications of infill development in an entirely built-out urban environment, where new housing projects must frequently displace vital, revenue-generating commercial and industrial uses.

F7: Residents in Orange County consistently express a
desire for local planning decisions to reflect
community priorities, including but not limited to
neighborhood character, safety considerations, the
environment and open-space preservation.
1 The City of Santa Ana supports this finding because local residents consistently express this perspective during long-range planning outreach efforts and during public hearings when the City reviews specific housing development applications.

F8: California’s regulatory construction costs (i.e.
permitting fees) present substantial challenges for
private housing developers—particularly those
delivering affordable units.
1 While California's regulatory construction costs present a financial hurdle for private housing developers, particularly for affordable housing developers, municipalities are caught in a difficult position. As a local jurisdiction, the City is legally required to recover the substantial administrative and operational costs associated with reviewing, processing, and inspecting residential development to ensure health, safety, and infrastructure standards are met. Because local governments cannot subsidize private development through their general funds without jeopardizing core public services, the high cost of regulatory compliance is a systemic challenge driven by expanding state mandates, leaving both developers and municipalities to operate within an increasingly constrained financial framework.

F9: The cost of constructing a single affordable housing unit in California typically ranges from approximately
$500,000 to $800,000 per unit when fully complying
with current state regulations. New low-income
1 The stated cost range of $500,000 to $800,000 per unit accurately reflects the current reality of developing affordable housing in Santa Ana. This high cost is driven by a combination of factors, including stringent state regulatory compliance, prevailing wage requirements, and the escalating cost of materials and land in built-out urban areas.

City Council
10 –
5 7/21/2026

2025-2026 Responses to Orange County Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations “California Housing Mandates: The Unintended Reshaping of Orange County Neighborhoods” Exhibit 2

Page 3 of 7 ends

2 7
6 6
7 Finding City Position
(1 or 2)*
Response to Finding
housing is generally not financially feasible without
public subsidy.

Because restricted rents permitted for low-income households cannot generate enough revenue to support these immense capital costs, a severe funding gap exists for every unit and new low-income housing is challenging without substantial public subsidies such as Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), local affordable housing funds, and state or federal grants.

F10: Prior to their dissolution in 2012, redevelopment
agencies served as a primary mechanism for cities and
counties to finance affordable housing and related
infrastructure. The loss of redevelopment has reduced
cities’ ability to support construction of affordable
units.
1 Prior to their dissolution by the state legislature in 2012, local redevelopment agencies were an effective tool to finance affordable housing and the infrastructure needed to support it. By leveraging tax- increment financing, these agencies provided a reliable, locally controlled revenue stream that was legally mandated to generate and preserve low- and moderate-income housing. The elimination of redevelopment stripped municipalities of their primary vehicle for assembling fractured land parcels, revitalizing underutilized urban corridors, and supplying the vital local matching funds required to secure highly competitive state and federal tax credits. Ultimately, the loss of redevelopment has severely diminished the capability of cities to catalyze affordable housing production at a scale that matches the current regional demand.

F11: Because public subsidy is limited and highly
competitive, cities seeking to produce meaningful
quantities of low-income housing must rely in part on
private development incentives, often resulting in
higher overall development densities and unit counts
than the RHNA allocation.
1 The shortage and competitive nature of public subsidies forces municipalities to rely on incentives like density bonuses to produce affordable housing. To financially offset the cost of these below- market-rate units, developers must scale up, resulting in development densities that frequently exceed baseline RHNA targets.

F12: The 6th Cycle RHNA methodology included
numerous technical inputs published by SCAG and
2 The complex technical inputs and models employed by SCAG and HCD made it difficult for local jurisdictions to independently verify or audit their 6th Cycle allocations. While Santa Ana possesses the professional

City Council
10 –
6 7/21/2026

2025-2026 Responses to Orange County Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations “California Housing Mandates: The Unintended Reshaping of Orange County Neighborhoods” Exhibit 2

Page 4 of 7 ends

2 7
6 6
7 Finding City Position
(1 or 2)*
Response to Finding
HCD; however, these inputs were highly complex and
difficult for cities to interpret or independently verify. staff to interpret the information, many other municipalities do not have the same level of administrative resources to analyze it. Because these targets carry severe statutory consequences for local communities, it is critical that future SCAG methodological documents be produced in a clear, accessible manner that is easily understood by municipal leaders and laypeople alike.
*For the purposes of this Orange County Grand Jury Report, City Position 1 indicates that the respondent agrees with the finding, and City Position 2 indicates that the respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding.

City Council
10 –
7 7/21/2026

2025-2026 Responses to Orange County Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations “California Housing Mandates: The Unintended Reshaping of Orange County Neighborhoods” Exhibit 2

Page 4 of 7 ends

2 7
6 6
7 City Council
10 –
8 7/21/2026

2025-2026 Responses to Orange County Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations “California Housing Mandates: The Unintended Reshaping of Orange County Neighborhoods” Exhibit 2

Page 5 of 7 ends

2 7
6 6
7 Recommendation City Position
(1, 2, 3, or
4)*
Response to Recommendation
R7: OCCOG, all Orange County cities and the County of
Orange should reassess the current dues structure, by
September 30, 2026, to ensure that OCCOG has the
resources necessary to effectively represent Orange
County jurisdictions in SCAG processes, including
RHNA methodology development and appeals.
3 This recommendation requires further analysis for feasibility, as any adjustment to the current dues structure must ensure that OCCOG member agencies have direct input on the proposed fee structures.

Furthermore, this assessment should strictly focus on ensuring the efficient and transparent use of existing funds before requesting additional resources from local jurisdictions.

R8: By December 31, 2026, the Orange County Board
of Supervisors should partner with cities to evaluate
countywide infrastructure capacity—including water,
wastewater, flood control, transportation, and public-
safety systems—and develop a coordinated regional
plan capable of supporting the level of housing growth
required under state law.
4 This recommendation is infeasible within the proposed timeframe, particularly without dedicated funding sources to cover the cost of such a study. Organizing a countywide evaluation of multiple distinct infrastructure systems (including independent water districts, sanitation districts, and municipal utilities) requires procurement, inter-agency agreements, and technical analysis that cannot be realistically executed by December 31, 2026. Furthermore, local resources are already impacted by the administrative and fiscal burdens of complying with existing state housing mandates, leaving limited internal capacity to absorb an unfunded regional planning initiative of this scale.

R9: By September 30, 2026, the Orange County Board
of Supervisors should strengthen its engagement with
OCCOG and increase staff support to develop a
shared, countywide database of potential housing
sites and key development-feasibility factors.
4 This recommendation is infeasible by the proposed September 30, 2026 deadline. The City of Santa Ana's multi-year experience in identifying and vetting residential sites under AB 2011 and SB 6 demonstrates that establishing a citywide parcel database is a highly complex undertaking that requires up to two years of rigorous spatial analysis. Attempting to mandate a similar countywide assessment across dozens of distinct local jurisdictions within a matter of weeks ignores the extensive technical realities it would place on already overburdened local planning staff.

City Council
10 –
9 7/21/2026

2025-2026 Responses to Orange County Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations “California Housing Mandates: The Unintended Reshaping of Orange County Neighborhoods” Exhibit 2

Page 6 of 7 ends

2 7
6 6
7 R11: The County of Orange and each city should
ensure consistent participation in SCAG and OCCOG
committees by September 30, 2026, including the
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), to strengthen
regional representation during RHNA-methodology
development.
1 The City of Santa Ana maintains active, consistent representation in regional planning bodies to ensure local constraints and priorities are voiced during RHNA-methodology development. The City's actions include attendance in monthly TAC meetings as well as monitoring and participating in SCAG’s policy committees, working groups, and general assemblies, particularly during the development, modeling, and feedback windows for the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) cycles.

R12: The County of Orange and each city should
designate a single technical representative, by
September 30, 2026, along with an alternate, for all
RHNA-related SCAG and OCCOG committees to ensure
continuity of participation and eliminate gaps in
representation across multiple decision-making
bodies.
2 The City of Santa Ana recognizes the importance of staff continuity in complex regional planning forums. Prior to September 30, 2026, the City will formally designate a primary technical representative and a qualified alternate from the Planning and Building Agency to participate in all RHNA-related SCAG and OCCOG committees. This action will formalize current staff coverage.

R14: By April 30, 2027, the County of Orange and each
city should publish annual monitoring dashboards
showing (a) entitlement pipeline conditions, (b)
realistic site yield, (c) assembled funding sources for affordable units, and (d) conversion rates from
planned capacity to issued permits and completed
units, ensuring that County and city-determined
capacity assumptions remain aligned with actual
production.
4 California municipalities are legally mandated to submit comprehensive annual reports on housing production to the state by way of Annual Progress Reports (APRs). Furthermore, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) already maintains and publishes a centralized public data dashboard for all cities and counties based directly on those APR submissions. Creating and maintaining separate, localized dashboards would result in an unnecessary and redundant expenditure of public resources, as the state's existing framework already tracks housing element implementation, entitlement pipelines, and actual production metrics against local capacity assumptions.

R15: By September 30, 2026, and ongoing, the County
Board of Supervisors and all city councils should make
a coordinated and sustained effort to educate their
constituents about the RHNA process—its
1 The City of Santa Ana consistently educates the public about the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process and its implications for the local community. Rather than operating as a separate, isolated initiative, these public education efforts are

City Council
10 –
10 7/21/2026

2025-2026 Responses to Orange County Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations “California Housing Mandates: The Unintended Reshaping of Orange County Neighborhoods” Exhibit 2

Page 7 of 7 ends

2 7
6 6
7 requirements, its impact on local planning and
community character, and the role residents can play
in shaping outcomes. Public education efforts should
also include guidance on how community members
can effectively engage with the California Legislature
and advocate for more realistic, data-driven housing
policies.
embedded into the everyday operations, ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, and explanations during public hearings. Through these integrated touchpoints, the City informs residents on how state- mandated housing targets influence local zoning, community character, and long-range planning, while simultaneously providing guidance on how community members can effectively participate in municipal decision-making and engage with state legislative representatives to advocate for realistic housing policies.

R16: By December 31, 2026, all cities should look to
enhance their relationships with not-for-profit
affordable housing developers to increase the
opportunity to develop more affordable housing.
1 The City of Santa Ana maintains strong, long-standing relationships with not-for-profit affordable housing developers, which have directly resulted in the production of deed-restricted units. Because of these established partnerships and proactive strategies, the City is on track to meet its below market-rate RHNA allocations for the 6th cycle. *For the purposes of this Orange County Grand Jury Report, City Position 1 indicates the recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action; City Position 2 indicates the recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation; City Position 3 indicates the recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable (timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report); and City Position 4 indicates the recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor.

City Council
10 –
11 7/21/2026

Planning and Building Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pb
Item # 11
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
July 21, 2026
TOPIC: Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma

AGENDA TITLE
Status Report on the Identification and Historic Evaluation of Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and file this report.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On May 5, 2026, the City Council considered a Councilmember-Requested Item directing staff to identify and evaluate public artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma for potential designation to the City Register of Historical Properties (“Register”), coordinate with property owners and stakeholders, prepare nomination materials for eligible artworks, and return to the City Council with a status report.

Since that time, staff has initiated implementation of the City Council’s direction by developing an inventory of known public artworks, coordinating with the artists’ families and other stakeholders, and evaluating the process, anticipated costs, schedule, and implementation considerations associated with historic evaluation and potential designation. This report provides a status update on those efforts and outlines the work that will continue as staff advances the project.

This report is informational only and does not designate any mural, sculpture, or public artwork as a historic resource. The inventory included in this report is preliminary and identifies resources that may warrant additional research and historic evaluation.

Inclusion in the inventory or completion of a historic evaluation does not establish that a resource is eligible for designation to the Register. Any future nomination would be considered individually by the Planning Commission through a separately noticed public hearing in accordance with Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC).

City Council
11 –
1 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

5 8
7 3

DISCUSSION
Project Background
Santa Ana is home to one of the largest concentrations of Chicano public art in Southern California. The murals and public artworks created by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma are widely recognized as important representations of Chicano history, culture, and artistic expression. Over the past several decades, concerns have grown regarding the potential loss or deterioration of significant murals in Santa Ana due to demolition, redevelopment, alteration, and deferred maintenance, resulting in increased community interest in long-term preservation strategies.

On May 5, 2026, the City Council considered a Councilmember-Requested Item requesting that staff identify and evaluate remaining works by both artists and prepare nominations to the City Register of Historical Properties for eligible works. The requested action specifically included:

1. Identification and documentation of extant murals, sculptures, and public artworks;

2. Evaluation under the criteria of Chapter 30;

3. Coordination with property owners and stakeholders;

4. Preparation of nomination materials; and

5. Returning to the City Council with status updates and recommendations.

Since receiving the City Council’s direction, staff has initiated evaluation and implementation of each of the requested tasks. The following discussion is organized consistent with the City Council’s direction and summarizes work completed to date, implementation considerations, and the remaining steps necessary to continue the historic evaluation and potential designation of the identified public artworks.

1. Identification and Documentation of Public Artworks
Staff has identified all intact and surviving murals, sculptures, and public artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma located throughout Santa Ana. Staff has also documented several public artworks that have been completely removed or destroyed that are not recoverable for designation and preservation, further demonstrating the need to preserve and protect extant artworks in the City created by these artists. The inventory includes works on City-owned properties, educational campuses, and other public and private properties.

Staff also initiated coordination with representatives of the Vazquez and O’Cadiz families to assist in identifying and documenting the artists’ public artworks within Santa Ana. Staff met with Rosemary Vasquez Tuthill, daughter of Emigdio Vasquez, and María del Pilar O’Cadiz, Ph.D., daughter of Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma, who provided historical information, artwork inventories, biographical materials, and other reference documents

City Council
11 –
2 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 3 ends

5 8
7 3
that assisted staff in verifying artwork titles, locations, and historical context. Information provided through this coordination informed the inventory presented in this report and will continue to support future historic evaluations and potential nominations. Staff will continue coordinating with the Santa Ana Community Artist(a) Coalition, affected property owners, and other stakeholders as the historic evaluation process moves forward.

The inventory is intended to provide an initial understanding of the potential scope of artworks that may be evaluated and does not constitute a determination of historic eligibility. Additional archival research, site surveys, and stakeholder outreach may result in refinement of the inventory or identification of additional works by the artists. As staff continues implementing the City Council’s direction, staff will refine the inventory, verify ownership and accessibility, and determine which works warrant preparation of California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) documentation and potential nomination.

The inventory of known public artworks is summarized below, and the locations of the identified works are depicted on the Inventory Map included as Exhibit 2 and 3. Table 1 summarizes the known public artworks identified to date and the potential scope of future evaluations. Table 2 identifies the extant public artworks that may warrant additional research and consideration for historic designation.

Table 1 –Inventory Summary of Public Artworks
Artist Known Works Extant Works
Known
Demolished/Lost
Works
Potentially
Accessible for
Evaluation
Emigdio Vasquez 12 8 4 41
Sergio O’Cadiz
Moctezuma 7 6 1 6
1 Staff is continuing to coordinate with the respective property owners to verify the current status and accessibility of these artworks.

Table 2 –Inventory of Public Artworks Identified for Further Evaluation Artist Title Location Ownership Year Preliminary
Status Address
Emigdio
Vasquez
Chicano
Gothic
Memorial
Park
City of Santa
Ana 1987 Extant 2102 S.

Flower St.

Emigdio
Vasquez
Children,
Yesterday,
Today and
Tomorrow
Madison Park City of Santa
Ana 1988 Extant
1528 S.

Standard
Ave.

Emigdio
Vasquez
Recuerdos de
mi Pueblo
El Tapatio
Dos
El Tapatio Dos
Mexicanos Grill 1990 Extant 1214 E.

Pomona St.

City Council
11 –
3 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 4 ends

5 8
7 3
Artist Title Location Ownership Year Preliminary
Status Address
Mexicanos
Grill
Emigdio
Vasquez
Spanish,
Indians, and
Today's
Hispanics
Heritage
Museum
Heritage
Museum 1989 Extant 3101 W.

Harvard St.

Emigdio
Vasquez
The Legacy of
Cesar Chavez
Santa Ana
College Santa Ana
College 1997 Extant
1530 W.

Seventeenth
St.

Emigdio
Vasquez
The
Strongest
Bond of
Humans
Santa Ana
College Santa Ana
College 1986 Extant
1530 W.

Seventeenth
St.

Emigdio
Vasquez
Visions of
Orange
County
OCTA Transit
Terminal OCTA 1991 Extant
400 W.

Santa Ana
Blvd.

Emigdio
Vasquez
Visions of
Santa Ana
Angels
Community
Park
City of Santa
Ana 1987 Extant 300 N.

Flower St.

Sergio
O’Cadiz
Fremont
Elementary
School Mural
Fremont
Elementary
School
Santa Ana
Unified School
District
1974 Restored 1930 W.

Tenth St.

Sergio
O’Cadiz
Monroe
Elementary
School Mural
Monroe
Elementary
School
Santa Ana
Unified School
District
1973 Under
restoration
417 E.

Central Ave.

Sergio
O’Cadiz
Native
American
Chief
Willard
Intermediate
School
Santa Ana
Unified School
District
Unknown Extant 1342 N.

Ross St.

Sergio
O’Cadiz
Santa Ana
City Hall
Concrete
Relief Mural
Santa Ana
City Hall
City of Santa
Ana 1972 Partially
Extant
20 Civic
Center Plaza
Sergio
O’Cadiz Spartan
Lathrop
Intermediate
School
Santa Ana
Unified School
District
Unknown Modified 1111 S.

Broadway
Sergio
O’Cadiz
The History
of the
Chicano
Santa Ana
College
Santa Ana
College 1974 Unknown1
1530 W.

Seventeenth
St.

City Council
11 –
4 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 5 ends

5 8
7 3
Artist Title Location Ownership Year Preliminary
Status Address
1 Staff is continuing to coordinate with the respective property owners to verify the current condition of these artworks.

2. Evaluation Under Chapter 30
Pursuant to Chapter 30 of the SAMC, the City may designate buildings, structures, objects, and sites to the Register if they satisfy one or more of the City’s historic significance criteria. The SAMC specifically contemplates the designation of “objects,” which may include murals, sculptures, and other public artworks.

Staff will be responsible for completing and preparing inventories, historic evaluations, DPR forms, and nomination materials. These materials are advisory and do not establish historic significance or eligibility for designation. The Planning Commission must independently evaluate the evidence presented, apply the historic designation criteria contained in Chapter 30 of the SAMC, consider testimony received during the public hearing process, and determine whether each nominated resource qualifies for designation.

The City may initiate nominations for works located on City-owned properties and may also initiate nominations for works located on other public or private properties, subject to the owner notification requirements contained in Chapter 30. Historic designation would not prohibit future restoration, alteration, relocation, or demolition of a mural. Rather, it would ensure that any such actions are subject to a public review process and consideration of the resource’s historic significance. Implementation of the City Council's direction also requires ongoing coordination with property owners, artists’ families, community organizations, and other stakeholders, as discussed in the following section.

3. Coordination with Property Owners and Stakeholders
Implementation of the City Council’s direction requires ongoing coordination with property owners, public agencies, artists’ families, community organizations, and other stakeholders. As the project advances, staff will continue verifying ownership, obtaining site access where necessary, and coordinating with affected property owners throughout the historic evaluation process. Moreover, several implementation considerations may affect staff’s ability to evaluate and potentially nominate identified artworks. Listed on the following page are considerations for implementation:
Accessibility and Site Documentation - The City’s inventory includes murals located on City-owned properties, educational campuses, and private properties.

City Council
11 –
5 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 6 ends

5 8
7 3
Murals Located Within Building Interiors - Several known murals are located within building interiors. While Chapter 30 permits the designation of “objects,” including public artworks, the SAMC provides limited guidance regarding the regulation and protection of interior murals.
Property Owner Participation and Consent - Chapter 30 does not require property owner consent for the designation of a historic resource. However, property owners must be notified of a proposed nomination. The public hearing process will also provide an opportunity for owners and interested stakeholders to participate in the decision-making process.
Existing Protections Against Repainting or Alteration - Staff are currently evaluating potential amendments to Chapter 30 to expressly address the treatment and protection of designated murals.
Future Modifications, Relocation, and Demolition - The applicability of historic review requirements to relocated murals or substantial modifications would require a case-by-case analysis based on the scope of the proposed work, the significance and integrity of the artwork, and the potential impacts to its character-defining features. Designation itself does not prohibit future restoration, relocation, alteration, or demolition, but designation provides an opportunity for public review and consideration of a mural’s significance.

4. Preparation of Historic Evaluation and Nomination Materials Staff is implementing the historic evaluation process in several phases. While work has begun on the inventory and stakeholder coordination, additional research, documentation, and historic evaluations will continue. The anticipated process includes the following phases:

1. Finalize Inventory and Identification, including all known extant murals, sculptures, and public artworks by both artists within Santa Ana; confirmation of ownership and accessibility; and outreach to affected stakeholders, including owners.

2. Site Survey and Documentation, including field surveys, photo-documentation, identification of character-defining features, and assessment of the physical integrity and condition of each identified mural, sculpture, and public artwork.

3. Historical Research, including preparation of a comprehensive historic context statement, as well as archival research that includes visits to repositories and interviews or outreach with individuals possessing knowledge regarding the artists and their work.

4. Preparation of DPR Forms using the standard City template for all other historic designations.

5. Historic Designation Proceedings, including public notices, stakeholder engagement, and Planning Commission public hearing for each nomination.

City Council
11 –
6 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 7 ends

5 8
7 3
Estimated Timeline and Resources
Timeline - Based on the current scope of work, the overall evaluation effort is anticipated to require approximately 12 months.
Outside Resources
oSpecialized Consultant Assistance - For the more technical components of mural research, photo-documentation, material science, and archival research, the City’s historic preservation consultant, Rincon Consultants, provided a preliminary cost estimate for the preparation of historic evaluations and DPR documentation. Based on the preliminary inventory of approximately 14 extant murals, sculptures, and public artworks identified to date, consultant costs associated with preparing historic evaluations and DPR documentation are estimated at approximately $102,200. This preliminary estimate is based on the consultant’s unit cost of $7,300 per artwork and assumes the evaluations would be completed as part of a coordinated effort, with City staff leading all project management, research, coordination, public outreach, environmental review (if required), preparation of staff reports, and public hearing support. oPublic Notification - Chapter 30 requires public notice to affected property owners prior to consideration of a historic designation, staff obtained an estimate of approximately $6,500 for the preparation of mailing labels, owner/occupant lists, and assessor parcel maps for the identified sites.

Although the inventory includes 14 extant artworks, the noticing estimate is based on 12 sites, as three of the identified artworks are located on the Santa Ana College campus and therefore correspond to a single noticing location rather than three separate sites.
Staff Resources - The City’s historic preservation program is presently administered by a principal and an associate planner. It is estimated that the work effort for this project will require up to 10 hours of work per week for each position during the anticipated 12-month completion period, which amounts to approximately $109,000 in staff time over the 12-month period.

5. Status Update and Next Steps
Since receiving direction from the City Council, staff has completed a preliminary inventory of known public artworks, initiated coordination with the artists’ families and community stakeholders, established an implementation strategy for historic evaluations, identified anticipated consultant and public noticing costs, and begun evaluating policy considerations associated with the long-term preservation of designated murals.

The inventory of murals, sculptures, and public artworks presented in this report is intended to serve as a starting point for future historic evaluations and may continue to evolve as additional information becomes available. As implementation progresses,

City Council
11 –
7 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 8 ends

5 8
7 3
additional archival research, stakeholder outreach, and site investigations may identify additional works by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma or provide new information regarding the condition, ownership, accessibility, or historical significance of currently identified artworks. Conversely, some works included in the preliminary inventory may ultimately be determined ineligible for historic designation, may not warrant nomination following completion of the historic evaluation process, or may not be designated by the Planning Commission after consideration of the applicable designation criteria.

Accordingly, the final number of artworks evaluated and nominated may differ from the preliminary inventory presented in this report and could affect the overall project scope, schedule, and consultant resources necessary to complete the initiative.

Staff will continue implementing the City Council’s direction by refining the inventory, conducting historic evaluations, preparing DPR documentation, coordinating with property owners and stakeholders, and, where appropriate, preparing nomination materials for consideration by the Planning Commission through separately noticed public hearings in accordance with Chapter 30 of the SAMC.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The action before the City Council is informational only and does not constitute a project pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable physical change in the environment. Future historic designation actions, if pursued, will be evaluated independently for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate fiscal impact associated with receiving and filing this report. Staff is continuing implementation of the City Council’s prior direction to evaluate public artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma. If necessary, staff will return to the City Council, with any future budget amendments, professional services agreement amendments, or other actions required to support consultant services, public noticing, and related implementation costs.

Consultant costs are currently estimated at approximately $102,200 for the preparation of historic evaluation and DPR documentation. In addition, public noticing costs are estimated at approximately $6,500 for mailing labels, owner/occupant lists, and assessor parcel maps. Accordingly, the currently estimated direct consultant and noticing costs total approximately $108,700. Additional City staff costs associated with project management, stakeholder coordination, environmental review (if required), preparation

City Council
11 –
8 7/21/2026

Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez and Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma July 21, 2026

Page 9 ends

5 8
7 3
of staff reports, public hearings, and quality assurance have been quantified and are estimated to be $109,000 over the 12-month completion period.

EXHIBITS

1. Councilmember-Requested Item dated May 5, 2026

2. Inventory Map of Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez

3. Inventory Map of Public Artworks by Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma Submitted By: Ali Pezeshkpour, AICP, Executive Director, Planning and Building Agency
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
11 –
9 7/21/2026

CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Carvalho

CITY MANAGER
Alvaro Nuñez

CITY CLERK
Jennifer L. Hall

20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA - P.O. BOX 1988, M31 - SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 647-6900 - FAX (714) 647-6954 - www.santa-ana.org

Councilmember-Requested Item Report

DATE
May 5, 2026

TOPIC
Historic Designation for Sergio O. Cadiz and Emigdio Vasquez Public Artworks Located in Santa Ana

COUNCILMEMBER-REQUESTED ITEM TITLE
Discuss and Consider Directing the City Manager to Direct Staff to Identify, Evaluate, and Prepare Nominations to the City Register of Historical Properties for Public Artworks by Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma and Emigdio Vasquez Located Within the City of Santa Ana

DISCUSSION
Background
Santa Ana is home to one of the largest concentrations of Chicano public art in Southern California. Among the most significant artists whose works define this cultural legacy are Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma (1934–2002) and Emigdio Vasquez (1939– 2014). Both artists produced works of regional, state, and national significance, and several of those works are located within Santa Ana on City-owned, other public, and private property.

About Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma
Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma was a Mexico City-born architect and muralist who studied painting under Diego Rivera before immigrating to California in 1961. His work is documented by the Getty Conservation Institute's América Tropical Interpretive Center and was featured in the California Historical Society's traveling exhibition Murales Rebeldes: L.A. Chicana/Chicano Murals Under Siege, organized as part of the Getty's Pacific Standard Time: LA/LA initiative. Within Santa Ana, his works include a concrete relief mural at City Hall (1972), the History and Evolution of the Chicano in the United States mural at Santa Ana College (1974, in collaboration with MEChA students), and a mural at Fremont Elementary School (1975). His Raitt Street mural, created in 1994 with community youth through the City's Safe Haven Youth Program, was whitewashed in July 2019 — an event that prompted national attention and helped catalyze ongoing community advocacy for mural preservation policy in Santa Ana.

About Emigdio Vasquez
Emigdio Vasquez, widely recognized as the Godfather of Chicano Art in Orange County, created more than 400 paintings and over 22 murals throughout the region. He

City Council
11 –
10 7/21/2026

CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Carvalho

CITY MANAGER
Alvaro Nuñez

CITY CLERK
Jennifer L. Hall

20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA - P.O. BOX 1988, M31 - SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 647-6900 - FAX (714) 647-6954 - www.santa-ana.org

was the first Orange County resident to receive the Maestro Award from the Latino Arts Network, and his work was the subject of Chapman University's Pacific Standard Time:

LA/LA exhibition My Barrio: Emigdio Vasquez and Chicana/o Identity in Orange County.

His Santa Ana works include Chicano Gothic (1987) at Memorial Park; Visions of Santa Ana (1987) at Angels Community Park; Children, Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (1988) at Madison Park; The Strongest Bond of Humans (1986), an untitled mural (1988–89), and The Legacy of Cesar Chavez (1997) at Santa Ana College; and Visions of Orange County (1991) at the OCTA Terminal. Chicano Gothic in particular has been the subject of a recent multi-year restoration effort led by the Santa Ana Community Artist(a) Coalition in collaboration with the Vasquez family, MuralColors, and the City, and is now preserved as a free-standing wall as part of the Memorial Park aquatic center renovation.

Lost Art
Despite the artistic, historical, and community significance of these works, the City has lost meaningful examples of Chicano public art over the years, including Vasquez's Visions of Orange County at the Bowers Museum (demolished c. 1991), Towards the Solidarity of All Peoples at the Jerome Center, and La Juventud, Nuestras Raices y el Futuro at the El Salvador Center, alongside O. Cadiz's whitewashed Raitt Street mural.

These losses underscore the need for durable legal protections for the works that remain.

Designating Historic Properties
Chapter 30 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code provides such a framework. Under § 30-1 and § 30-2, the Historic Resources Commission, by resolution and at a noticed public hearing, may designate buildings, structures, objects, or sites as historical properties on the City Register. Designation criteria include works associated with notable artists or designers whose style influenced artistic development (§ 30-2(a)(2)) and objects or sites of historical significance associated with important political, social, economic, or cultural activity (§ 30-2(a)(4)(d)). While § 30-2(a) generally requires that nominated works be at least 50 years old, § 30-2.1 expressly allows the designation of younger works "of exceptional significance" meeting one or more of the same criteria. The works of O.

Cadiz and Vasquez located in Santa Ana satisfy these criteria, with several of the older O. Cadiz works (1972, 1974, 1975) meeting the 50-year threshold and the Vasquez works qualifying under the exceptional-significance exception based on documented academic, curatorial, and community recognition.

Historic Designation Filing Fees
Pursuant to § 30-2.4, governmental agencies are exempt from designation filing fees.

The City may therefore initiate nominations for works it owns, and may also initiate nominations for works on other property subject to the owner-notification requirements of § 30-2(b). Designation does not preclude further restoration, modification under § 30- 6 (certificate of appropriateness), or future demolition where warranted under § 30-7, but it ensures that any such action proceeds through a public, transparent process with appropriate review.

Arts and Culture Commission; Public Art and Preservation Policy Initiating these nominations also complements the Public Art and Preservation Policy currently under development through the Arts and Culture Commission and supports the broader community advocacy that has driven recent mural preservation successes

City Council
11 –
11 7/21/2026

CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Carvalho

CITY MANAGER
Alvaro Nuñez

CITY CLERK
Jennifer L. Hall

20 CIVIC CENTER PLAZA - P.O. BOX 1988, M31 - SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 647-6900 - FAX (714) 647-6954 - www.santa-ana.org

in Santa Ana, including the 2024 restoration of the La Raza murals on Civic Center Drive and the recent preservation of Chicano Gothic.

Historic Resources Commission
The Historic Resources Commission (HRC), not the City Council, holds the authority to designate properties to the City Register. The action recommended through this councilmember-requested item is limited to directing staff to identify eligible works, coordinate with stakeholders, prepare nomination applications, and bring those applications forward for HRC consideration through the established process under Chapter 30.

Recommended Action
Direct the City Manager to direct staff to identify, evaluate, and prepare nominations to the City Register of Historical Properties for public artworks by Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma and Emigdio Vasquez located within the City of Santa Ana, including specifically:

1. Identify all extant murals, sculptures, and public artworks by Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma and Emigdio Vasquez located within the City of Santa Ana, including works on city-owned, other public, and private property, and verify the current condition of each work, including the Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma concrete relief mural at Santa Ana City Hall (1972) and Emigdio Vasquez's Chicano Gothic (1987) at Memorial Park;

2. Evaluate each identified work against the criteria for designation under Santa Ana Municipal Code §§ 30-2 and 30-2.1, and determine the appropriate category for designation under § 30-2.2 (Landmark, Key, or Contributive);

3. Coordinate with the Vasquez and O. Cadiz families, the Santa Ana Community Artist(a) Coalition, and other relevant property owners (including the Santa Ana Unified School District, the Rancho Santiago Community College District, and the Orange County Transportation Authority) regarding works on property they own or control;

4. Prepare and submit nomination applications to the Historic Resources Commission for those works determined to meet the criteria under Chapter 30, prioritizing works on city-owned property — including specifically Chicano Gothic (1987) at Memorial Park and the Sergio O. Cadiz Moctezuma concrete relief mural (1972) at Santa Ana City Hall; and

5. Return to the City Council within 90 days with a status report identifying the works under evaluation, a proposed nomination schedule, and any further direction needed to complete the process.

SUBMITTED BY
Councilwoman Jessie Lopez

EXHIBIT(S)
N/A

City Council
11 –
12 7/21/2026

Exhibit 2 - Preliminary Inventory Map of Public Artworks by Emigdio Vasquez Item No. Name Location Address Year Condition
1 Chicano Gothic Santa Ana Memorial Park 2102 S Flower St Santa Ana, CA 92707 1987 Under restoration 2 Children, Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow Madison Park 1528 S Standard Ave Santa Ana, CA 92707 1988 Poor condition 3 Recuerdos de mi Pueblo El Tapatio Dos Mexicanos Grill 1214 E Pomona St Santa Ana, CA 92707 1990 Good condition 4 Spanish, Indians, and Today's Hispanics Heritage Museum 3101 W Harvard St Santa Ana, CA 92704 1989 Good condition 5 The Legacy of Cesar Chavez Santa Ana College 1530 W 17th St 1997 Excellent condition 6 The Strongest Bond of Humans Santa Ana College 1530 W 17th St Santa Ana, CA 92706 1986 Good condition 7 Visions of Orange County OCTA Transit Terminal 400 W Santa Ana Blvd Santa Ana, CA 92701 1991 Decent condition 8 Visions of Santa Ana Angels Community Park 300 N Flower St Santa Ana, CA 92703 1987 Good condition 9 Visions of Orange County Bowers Museum 2002 N Main St 1986 Demolished 10 Towards the Solidarity of All Peoples Jerome Recreation Center 726 S Center St 1987 Demolished 11 La Juventud, Nuestras Raices y el Futuro El Salvador Center 1825 W Civic Center Dr 1987 Demolished 12 Waiting for the Bus OCTD Art in Motion OCTA 550 S Main St 1987 Demolished Notes:

Demolished murals not mapped.

City Council
11 –
13 7/21/2026

?ìE
?ìE
!"^$
?sE
%&l(
?uE

EUCLID ST

BRISTOL ST

SANTA ANA BLVD

EDINGER AV

BRISTOL ST

SUNFLOWER AV

WARNER AV

RED HILL AV

LA VETA AV

HARBOR BLVDHARBOR BLVD

RAITT ST

WASHINGTON AV

NEWHOPE ST

WARNER AV
1ST ST
1ST ST
1ST ST

TUSTIN AV

SEGERSTROM AV
17TH ST 17TH ST

FAIRVIEW
ST

FAIRVIEW ST

BRISTOL ST

MAIN ST

FLOWER ST

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTA CLARA AV

FAIRHAVEN AV

ALTON AV

GARDEN GROVE
BLVD

GRAND AV

GLASSELL ST

EDINGER AV

EDINGER AV
DYER
RD

WESTMINSTER AV

MC FADDEN AV

GRAND AV

DYER RD

FLOWER ST

WARNER AV

MACARTHUR BLVD

BROADWAY

BROADWAY
Santa Ana Ri
ver
Santa Ana River
Map Date: June 24, 2026
Disclaimer: This
map displays information within the City of Santa Ana and is for reference only. Description and information are subject to change. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the City of Santa Ana makes no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of the information contained on this map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions.

I
0 ½ 1¼
Miles
Preliminary Inventory Map of Public Artworks
by Emigdio V
asquez

1. Chicano Gothic Santa Ana Memorial | 2102 S Flower St | Mural | Under R estoration

2. Children, Yesterday, Today,
and Tomorr
ow
Madison Park | 1528 S Standard Ave | Mural | Poor
Condition

3. Recuerdos de mi Pueblo El Tapatio Dos Mexicanos Gri ll | 1214 E Pomona St | Mural | Good Condition

4. Spanish, Indians, and Today's
Hispanics
Heritage Museum | 1214 E P
omona St | Mural | Good
Condition

5. The Legacy of Cesar Chavez Santa Ana College | 1530 W 17 St | Mur al | Excellent Condition

6. The Strongest Bond of
Humans
Santa Ana College | 1530 W 17 St | Mur
al | Good
Condition

7. Visions of Orange County OCTA T ransit Terminal | 400 W Santa Ana Blvd | Mural | Decent Condition

8. Visions of Santa Ana Angels Communit y Park | 300 N Flower St | Mural | Good Condition

City Council
11 –
14 7/21/2026

Exhibit 3 - Preliminary Inventory Map of Public Artworks by Sergio O'Cadiz Moctezuma Item No. Name Location Address Year Condition
1 Fremont Elementary School Mural Fremont Elementary School 1930 W 10th St, Santa Ana, CA 92703 1973 Restored 2 Monroe Elementary School Mural Monroe Elementary School 417 E Central Ave, Santa Ana, CA 92707 1973 Under restoration 3 Native American Chief Willard Intermediate School 1342 N Ross St, Santa Ana, CA 92706 Unknown Unknown 4 Santa Ana City Hall Concrete Relief Mural Santa Ana City Hall 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 1972 Partially extant 5 Spartan Lathrop Intermediate School 1111 S Broadway, Santa Ana, CA 92707 Unknown Modified 6 The History Chicano in the United States Nealley Library, Santa Ana College 1530 W 17th St, Santa Ana, CA 92706 1974 Unknown 7 Raitt Street Mural Raitt Street, Santa Ana Santa Ana, CA Unknown Destroyed Notes:

Demolished mural not mapped.

City Council
11 –
15 7/21/2026

?ìE
?ìE
!"^$
?sE
%&l(
?uE

EUCLID ST

BRISTOL ST

SANTA ANA BLVD

EDINGER AV

BRISTOL ST

SUNFLOWER AV

WARNER AV

RED HILL AV

LA VETA AV

HARBOR BLVDHARBOR BLVD

RAITT ST

WASHINGTON AV

NEWHOPE ST

WARNER AV
1ST ST
1ST ST
1ST ST

TUSTIN AV

SEGERSTROM AV
17TH ST 17TH ST

FAIRVIEW
ST

FAIRVIEW ST

BRISTOL ST

MAIN ST

FLOWER ST

CIVIC CENTER DR

SANTA CLARA AV

FAIRHAVEN AV

ALTON AV

GARDEN GROVE
BLVD

GRAND AV

GLASSELL ST

EDINGER AV

EDINGER AV
DYER
RD

WESTMINSTER AV

MC FADDEN AV

GRAND AV

DYER RD

FLOWER ST

WARNER AV

MACARTHUR BLVD

BROADWAY

BROADWAY
Santa Ana Ri
ver
Santa Ana River
Map Date: June 24, 2026
Disclaimer: This map displays information within the City of Santa Ana and is for reference only . Description and information are subject to change. While every effort is made to ensure accuracy, the City of Santa Ana makes no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of the information contained on this map and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions.

I
0 ½ 1¼
Miles
Preliminary Inventory Map of Public Artworks
by Sergio O’Cadiz Moctezuma

1. Fremont Elementary
School Mural

2. Monroe Elementary School
Mural

3. Native American Chief

5. Spartan

City Council
11 –
16 7/21/2026

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 12
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
July 21, 2026
TOPIC: Certification of Final Tract Map 2025-01, County Tract Map No. 19337

AGENDA TITLE
Certification of Approval by City Engineer of the Final Tract Map No. 2025-01, County Tract Map No. 19337 at 2020 East First Street (Applicant: Meritage Homes of California, Inc., a California Corporation)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and file the certification of approval by City Engineer of the Final Tract Map 2025-01, County Tract Map No. 19337 at 2020 East First Street.

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
In California, the regulation and control of land subdivisions are governed by the Subdivision Map Act, which delegates authority to local legislative bodies. Within the City of Santa Ana, subdivision regulations and procedures are codified in Chapters 34 and 41 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SAMC).

Pursuant to SAMC Chapter 41, applicants must first submit a tentative tract map for staff review to ensure compliance with applicable standards and regulations. Once staff determines the map complies with all applicable requirements, it is presented to the Planning Commission for approval, in accordance with SAMC Section 34-127.

Following the Planning Commission’s action, staff notifies the City Council of the decision on the next business day. Applicants have ten (10) days to appeal a Planning Commission decision to the City Council.

Following the Planning Commission’s approval, and pursuant to SAMC Chapter 34, the applicant must prepare and submit a Final Map for review by the City Engineer.

Although the City Engineer is responsible for approving or disapproving the Final Map, the Subdivision Map Act and Santa Ana Municipal Code require the City Council to receive formal notice that the Final Map is under review prior to the City Engineer's action. The City Engineer ensures the final map is in substantial conformance with the

City Council
12 –
1 7/21/2026

Certification of Final Tract Map 2025-01, County Tract Map No. 19337 July 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

5 8
9 6
approved tentative map and that all requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and SAMC have been satisfied. If these requirements are met, approval of the Final Map is an administrative action. As required by SAMC Section 34-183, the City Engineer notifies the City Council that the final map is under review and subject to approval or disapproval.

On March 24, 2025, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map No. 2025- 01 for the property located at 2020 East First Street, authorizing subdivision of the site into eighty-six (86) residential condominium units (Exhibit 1). The project includes fifteen (15) residential buildings consisting of eighty (80) three-story townhouse units within twelve (12) buildings and six (6) four-story duplex units within three buildings, for a total of eighty-six (86) residential condominium units. The project will include affordable units, with five units designated for very low-income households. As part of the development, a total of 9,767 square feet of the project site will be dedicated to public accessible open space.

This report serves as formal notification to the City Council that the applicant has submitted Final Tract Map No. 2025-01 (County Tract Map No. 19337) for City Engineer approval in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act and SAMC. No discretionary action by the City Council is required. The map is currently under final review by the City Engineer for technical accuracy and compliance with all applicable conditions of approval. Pursuant to SAMC Section 34-183, the City Engineer will issue the final determination to approve or disapprove the final map within ten (10) days following the City Council meeting on July 21, 2026.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with the action. The project is exempt from further review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15268(b).

A Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2024-53 has been filed for this project.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Tentative Tract Map

2. Final Tract Map
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director – Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
12 –
2 7/21/2026

0 1" = 50'
2550100
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
3 7/21/2026

℄
℄
℄
℄
0 1" = 20'
102040
’
’
’
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
4 7/21/2026

℄
℄
℄
℄
℄
0 1" = 20'
102040
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
5 7/21/2026

0 1" = 30'
153060
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
6 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
7 7/21/2026

0 1" = 30'
153060
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
8 7/21/2026

℄
℄
℄ ℄
℄
℄
℄
℄
℄
0 1" = 30'
15 30 60
·
·
·
EXHIBIT 1

City Council
12 –
9 7/21/2026

Draft for review only - 3rd submittal
27th
January
2026
EXHIBIT 2

City Council
12 –
10 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT 2

City Council
12 –
11 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT 2

City Council
12 –
12 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT 2

City Council
12 –
13 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT 2

City Council
12 –
14 7/21/2026

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 13
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
July 21, 2026
TOPIC: Sodium Hypochlorite Generation, Maintenance, and Equipment

AGENDA TITLE
Agreement with PSI Water Technologies, Inc. for Sodium Hypochlorite Generation, Maintenance, and Equipment (Specification No. 26-049) (Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with PSI Water Technologies, Inc. to provide sodium hypochlorite generation, maintenance, and equipment in an amount beginning July 21, 2026, and expiring July 20, 2027, with an estimated annual budget of $500,000 with provisions for four, one-year extensions, in a total amount not to exceed $2,500,000 (Agreement No. A-2026-XXX).

GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for the daily operations of the City’s drinking water system. The water system comprises of approximately 480 miles of water main, 21 groundwater wells, seven pump stations, 10 reservoirs with a storage capacity of 45 million gallons, four pressure-regulating stations, and seven connection points to the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The system has an average daily demand of 43 million gallons from its roughly 45,000 service connections.

To maintain compliance with federal and state drinking water regulations, the City uses sodium hypochlorite generation (SHG) units to produce chlorine for potable water treatment. The SHG units utilized by the City meet the water quality requirements established under the City’s Domestic Water Supply permit and are essential for maintaining regulatory compliance; therefore, their ongoing maintenance and reliability are critical to water distribution operations. In addition, this form of sodium hypochlorite generation is recognized as one of the safest methods for introducing chlorine into a potable water system, providing safe and reliable drinking water to residents. These systems require specialized preventive maintenance, system calibration, replacement of proprietary components, and emergency repair services to ensure uninterrupted operation.

City Council
13 –
1 7/21/2026

Sodium Hypochlorite Generation, Maintenance, and Equipment July 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

5 8
9 4
Invitation for Bids (IFB) No. 26-049 was advertised on April 9, 2026 on the City’s online bid management and publication system, PlanetBids. A summary of vendor participation and results is as follows:
365 Vendors notified
2 Santa Ana vendors notified
9 Vendors downloaded the bid packet
1 Responsive bid received
0 Responsive bids received from Santa Ana vendor Bids were solicited, opened on May 5, 2026, and evaluated (Exhibit 1). One bid was submitted by the IFB deadline and was determined to be responsive to the specifications and met the City’s requirements. The bid submitted by PSI Water Technologies, Inc. was determined to be the lowest, responsible bid, was responsive to the specifications, and meets the City’s requirements.

Staff recommends awarding an agreement to PSI Water Technologies, Inc. (Exhibit 2) to provide SHG maintenance and equipment. The firm has demonstrated strong technical qualifications and experience in maintaining SHG systems and, as the current provider for the City of Santa Ana, has successfully provided similar services for other municipalities. In addition to serving the City of Santa Ana, the firm currently provides similar maintenance and support services to Rancho California Water District, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, and Irvine Ranch Water District. Award of the agreement ensures the continued reliability and operational performance of the City’s SHG systems, including routine maintenance, emergency repairs, and system upgrades, and has the capability to provide prompt maintenance services, emergency repairs, and system upgrades.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funds are budgeted and available in the following accounts for Fiscal Year 2026-27.

Subsequent fiscal year funding for renewal options, if exercised, will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council consideration. The following is an estimate of expenditures by fiscal year:

Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit – Account
No.

Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount

CONTRACT (ONE-YEAR TERM)

City Council
13 –
2 7/21/2026

Sodium Hypochlorite Generation, Maintenance, and Equipment July 21, 2026

Page 3 ends

5 8
9 4
2026-27
(Jul 21-
Jun 30)
06017640-
62300 Water Fund
Water Utility Production
& Supply, Contract
Services-Professional
$472,603
2027-28
(Jul 1 –
Jul 20)
06017640-
62300 Water Fund
Water Utility Production
& Supply, Contract
Services-Professional
$27,397
Contract (One-Year) Total $500,000

OPTIONAL FOUR ONE-YEAR EXTENSIONS
2027-28
(Jul 21 –
Jun 30)
06017640-
62300 Water Fund
Water Utility Production
& Supply, Contract
Services-Professional
$472,603
2028-29 06017640-
62300 Water Fund
Water Utility Production
& Supply, Contract
Services-Professional
$500,000
2029-30 06017640-
62300 Water Fund
Water Utility Production
& Supply, Contract
Services-Professional
$500,000
2030-31 06017640-
62300 Water Fund
Water Utility Production
& Supply, Contract
Services-Professional
$500,000
2031-32
(Jul 1 –
Jun 30)
06017640-
62300 Water Fund
Water Utility Production
& Supply, Contract
Services-Professional
$27,397
Optional Four One-Year Extension Total $2,000,000
TOTAL (Five Year Contract): $2,500,000

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Abstract of Bids (No. 26-049)

2. Agreement with PSI Water Technologies, Inc.

Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director of Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
13 –
3 7/21/2026

Item Num Description Unit of Measure Quantity Unit Price Line Total Comment 1 Remove existing units, furnish and install MicrOclor Multi- Cell 100 PPD, NSF-61 Certified, Onsite Hypochlorite Generator System (1,000 gallons storage) EA 1 $508,943.58 $508,943.58 2 Remove existing units, furnish and install MicrOclor Multi- Cell 60 PPD, NSF-61 Certified, Onsite Hypochlorite Generator System (685 gallons storage) EA 1 $446,983.53 $446,983.53 3 Remove existing units, furnish and install MicrOclor Multi- Cell 60 PPD, NSF-61 Certified, Onsite Hypochlorite Generator System (475 gallons storage) EA 1 $437,494.56 $437,494.56 4 Remove existing units, furnish and install MicrOclor Multi- Cell 400 PPD, NSF-61 Certified, Onsite Hypochlorite Generator System (1,500 gallons storage) EA 1 $624,559.89 $624,559.89 5 Metering Pumps, 77 GPH @130 PSI Assembly (pair) EA 2 $74,144.96 $148,289.92 6 Metering Pumps, 45 GPH @150 PSI Assembly (pair) EA 2 $71,630.22 $143,260.44 7 Metering Pumps, 25 GPH @175 PSI Assembly (pair) EA 2 $70,337.95 $140,675.90 8 PLC Programming & Integration (per site) EA 4 $53,049.74 $212,198.96 9 Spare Parts EA 8 $39,004.68 $312,037.44
10 Local Support (24/7) EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 this service is part of pruchase for every PSI System for 24/7 support.
11 Annual Maintenance for MicrOclor Multi-Cell 100 PPD, NSF-61 Certified, Onsite Hypochlorite Generator System EA 4 $4,800.00 $19,200.00 12 Annual Maintenance for MicrOclor Multi-Cell 60 PPD, NSF-61 Certified, Onsite Hypochlorite Generator System EA 7 $4,800.00 $33,600.00 13 Annual Maintenance for MicrOclor Multi-Cell 400 PPD, NSF-61 Certified, Onsite Hypochlorite Generator System EA 2 $4,800.00 $9,600.00
14 Hach Analyzer, CLT10 sc Total Chlorine Sensor, SC200 Controller, and Stainless- Steel Panel (Product Number 2981700) EA 2 $14,739.86 $29,479.72 15 PAX Water Mixer (PWM500) With Chemical Injection, PAX Control Centers, and Hach Analyzer EA 1 $81,285.71 $81,285.71 Incl diving service to place mixers 16 PAX Residual Control System EA 1 $463,217.29 $463,217.29 Incl. installation and diving service to place mixers 17 Annual Maintenance for PAX Water Mixers and Reservoir Control System EA 15 $4,400.00 $66,000.00 use Rover for Inspection of Mixers, Not costing for diving services
18 Remove Existing Softening Systems and Design, Furnish and Install New Kinetico Softening Systems EA 15 $13,719.30 $205,789.50
19 Field Technician Hourly Rate (Regular Time) EA 10 $225.00 $2,250.00 20 Field Technician Hourly Rate (Weekends and Overtime) EA 10 $337.50 $3,375.00 21 Sales Tax Amount (Please note sales tax rate in comments section) LOT 1 $359,662.34 $359,662.34 9.25% Tax Rate for Santa Ana CA 22 For items not specified herein, vendor must enter minimum percentage (%) discount offered to the City at the unit price (10% would be entered as .10).

Discount from vendor's price list shall remain firm throughout the term of the contract.

EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 10% discount for items not specificed herein 23 Stock Items - Number of days after receipt of order DAY 1 $0.00 $0.00 1-2 days for stock items 24 Non-Stock Items - Number of days after receipt of order DAY 1 $0.00 $0.00 1-2 Weeks for standard non stock, up to 6 weeks for custom non stock items
25 Location - Type address of store or satellite warehouse in comments section and a zero-dollar amount in unit price area. EA 1 $0.00 $0.00 Milpitas, CA ABSTRACT OF BIDS EXHIBIT 1
City of Santa Ana
Submissions for Solicitation Hypochlorite Generation Units (26-049) Submissions Due on May 05, 2026 2:00 PM (PDT)

City Council
13 –
4 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT 2

City Council
13 –
5 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
6 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
7 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
8 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
9 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
10 7/21/2026

Rodolfo Rosas (Jul 6, 2026 14:02:18 PDT)
Rodolfo Rosas

City Council
13 –
11 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
12 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
13 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
14 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
15 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
16 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
17 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
18 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
19 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
20 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
21 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
22 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
23 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
24 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
25 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
26 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
27 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
28 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
29 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
30 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
31 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
32 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
33 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
34 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
35 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
36 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
37 7/21/2026

City Council
13 –
38 7/21/2026

Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.org/pw
Item # 14
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
July 21, 2026
TOPIC: Construction Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services

AGENDA TITLE
Agreements with AESCO, Inc., Kleinfelder Inc., Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc., and Twining, Inc. for Construction Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services (General Fund & Non-General Fund)

RECOMMENDED ACTION

1. Authorize the City Manager to execute federally procured agreements with AESCO, Inc., Kleinfelder Inc., Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc., and Twining, Inc. to provide on-call materials testing and special inspections services for a shared annual amount of $800,000, for a term beginning July 21, 2026 and expiring July 20, 2027, with provisions for four, one-year extensions in a total aggregate amount not to exceed $4,000,000. (Agreement Nos. A-2026-XXX)

2. Authorize the City Manager to execute agreements with AESCO, Inc., Kleinfelder Inc., Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc., and Twining, Inc. to provide on-call materials testing and special inspections services for shared annual amount of $800,000, for a term beginning July 21, 2026 and expiring July 20, 2027, with provisions for four, one-year extensions in a total aggregate amount not to exceed $4,000,000. (Agreement Nos. A-2026-XXX)
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes

DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for the administration and oversight of all Capital Improvement Projects in the City. PWA manages various types of construction projects, including street pavement rehabilitation, traffic signal installations, underground utilities, building improvements, bridges, and park facilities. These projects require independent materials testing and special inspections to verify compliance with approved plans, specifications, and applicable building and engineering standards.

Special inspections are required for certain types of construction activities such as welding and fire proofing.

City Council
14 –
1 7/21/2026

Construction Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services July 21, 2026

Page 2 ends

5 8
9 8
The volume and technical specialization of these services exceed available in-house resources and, in many cases, require certified third-party testing and inspection.

Having specialized firms available on an as-needed basis to support the City’s construction management team is necessary to keep projects on schedule. The current agreements in place for these services expired on July 5, 2026 with an average annual expenditure of $800,000.

Staff recommends retaining testing and inspection firms to provide on-call quality assurance services during the construction of CIP projects. The selected firms will provide on-call testing and inspections that include code-required inspection of structural steel, concrete placement, masonry, welding, reinforcing steel, soils, asphalt, and other construction activities to verify compliance with applicable engineering and building standards.

Staff recommends procuring two separate sets of agreements, Federal and Non- Federal, to provide flexibility in administering projects funded through different sources.

Federally funded projects require consultants to comply with specific federal regulations and procurement requirements that typically result in higher costs. Maintaining both sets of agreements allows the City to assign work based on project funding requirements, ensure regulatory compliance, obtain best pricing, and streamline project delivery while minimizing procurement timelines and administrative costs.

Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 26-059A was issued on May 1, 2026 on the City’s online bid management and publication system.

A summary of vendor participation and results is as follows:

1,041
1 52
11 0
Vendors notified
Santa Ana vendor notified
Vendors downloaded the RFP packet
Responsive proposals received
Responsive proposals received from Santa Ana vendors
Proposals were solicited, opened on May 21, 2026, and evaluated. Eleven proposals were submitted by the RFP deadline and were determined to be responsive to the specifications and met the City’s requirements. An evaluation committee reviewed and rated the proposals according to the criteria listed in the RFP. Based on the evaluation criteria established in the RFP, the following firms received the highest overall scores:

RANK BIDDER’S NAME LOCATION
1 Kleinfelder, Inc. Ontario, CA
2 Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc. Chino, CA
3 Twining, Inc. Long Beach, CA
4 AESCO Huntington Beach, CA

City Council
14 –
2 7/21/2026

Construction Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services July 21, 2026

Page 3 ends

5 8
9 8
Staff recommends awarding agreements to AESCO, Kleinfelder Inc., Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc., and Twining, Inc. (Exhibits 1 - 8), as the four firms achieved the highest overall scores and were determined to be the most qualified firms. The selected firms demonstrated extensive experience with public works construction projects, strong technical capabilities, qualified personnel, familiarity with Federal and Caltrans requirements, and the capacity to respond to multiple concurrent assignments.

Materials testing and inspection requests occur simultaneously on multiple projects and often require rapid response. Staff recommends multiple on-call firms to ensure adequate capacity, maintain project schedules, and allow work to be assigned based on consultant availability, expertise, and workload. Awarding agreements to four qualified firms will provide the City with sufficient capacity to support multiple concurrent construction projects, maintain project schedules, ensure compliance with applicable construction standards, and deliver quality assurance services in a timely and cost- effective manner.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact at this time. These on-call agreements establish contractual authority only. Funding for individual task orders is approved by City Council through the annual operating and capital budgets, or other Council-approved budget actions when approving agreements, as applicable. Prior to utilizing any of these on-call services, Public Works Agency staff must obtain approval from the Finance and Management Services Agency (FMSA) by submitting a Notice to Proceed Request. This request must specify the funding source and the required dollar amount. FMSA will verify that the necessary funds are encumbered and available within the authorization and aggregate limits of these agreements. Once approved, PWA will issue a Notice to Proceed to the vendor detailing the specific scope of work and the maximum expenditure for the task.

EXHIBIT(S)

1. Agreement with AESCO – Caltrans Version

2. Agreement with Kleinfedler Inc. – Caltrans Version

3. Agreement with Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc. – Caltrans Version

4. Agreement with Twining, Inc. – Caltrans Version

5. Agreement with AESCO

6. Agreement with Kleinfedler Inc.

7. Agreement with Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc.

8. Agreement with Twining, Inc.

Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director, Public Works Agency Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager

City Council
14 –
3 7/21/2026

AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ON-CALL MATERIAL TESTING AND SPECIAL

INSPECTION SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 21st day of July, 2026 by and between AESCO, Inc. (“Consultant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

RECITALS
A. On May 1, 2026, the City issued Request for Proposal (“RFP”) No. 26-059A, by which it sought qualified consultants to provide on-call material testing and special inspection services for the City’s Public Works Agency.

B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City.

Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 26-059A.

C. In undertaking the performance of this Agreement, Consultant represents that it is knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Consultant under this Agreement will be performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from a professional consulting firm in the field.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES
On an on-call basis, and at the City’s sole discretion, Consultant shall perform the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 26-059A, which is attached as Exhibit A, and as more specifically delineated in Consultant’s proposal, which is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated in full.

2. ALLOWABLE COSTS AND PAYMENTS
a. City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement at the rates and charges identified in Exhibit C .

Consultant is one of four (4) consultants selected to provide services in an on-call basis under RFP No. 26-059A. The total compensation for these services provided by all such consultants selected shall not exceed the shared annual amount of $800,000 during the initial term. The aggregate amount expended under this Agreement, including all extension periods, if exercised, shall not exceed $4,000,000. b. Consultant’s Fee and Cost Proposal is attached hereto and fully incorporated herein as Exhibit C. The specified hourly rates shall include direct salary costs, employee benefits, overhead, and fees. These rates are not adjustable for the performance period set forth in this Agreement. In addition, Consultant will be reimbursed for incurred Exhibit 1

City Council
14 –
4 7/21/2026

(actual) direct costs other than salary costs that are in the fee and cost proposal and identified in the fee and cost proposal, and in the executed Task Order. c. Specific projects will be assigned to Consultant through issuance of Task Orders. After a project to be performed under this Agreement is identified by City, City will prepare a draft Task Order less the cost estimate. A draft Task Order will identify the scope of services, expected results, project deliverables, period of performance, project schedule and will designate a City Project Coordinator. The draft Task Order will be delivered to Consultant for review. Consultant shall return the draft Task Order within ten (10) calendar days along with a Cost Estimate, including a written estimate of the number of hours and hourly rates per staff person, any anticipated reimbursable expenses, overhead, fee if any, and total dollar amount. After agreement has been reached on the negotiable items and total cost, the finalized Task Order shall be signed by both City and Consultant. d. Task Orders may be negotiated for a lump sum (Firm Fixed Price) or for specific rates of compensation, both of which must be based on the labor and other rates set forth in Consultant’s Cost Proposal. e. Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the rates as specified in the approved Cost Proposal. f. When milestone cost estimates are included in the approved Cost Proposal, Consultant shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from City before exceeding such estimate. g. Progress payments for each Task Order will be made monthly in arrears based on services provided and actual costs incurred. h. Consultant shall not commence performance of work or services until this Agreement has been approved by City, and notification to proceed has been issued by City. No payment will be made prior to approval or for any work performed prior to approval of this Agreement. i. A Task Order is of no force or effect until returned to City and signed by an authorized representative of City. No expenditures are authorized on a project, and work shall not commence until a Task Order for that project has been executed by City. j. Consultant will be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will permit upon receipt by City of itemized invoices in triplicate. Separate invoices itemizing all costs are required for all work performed under each Task Order. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance of work for which Consultant is billing, or upon completion of the Task Order. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone, on each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the approved Cost Proposal and shall reference this Agreement number, project title, and Task Order number. Credits due to City that include any equipment

City Council
14 –
5 7/21/2026

purchased under the Equipment Purchase provision of this Agreement must be reimbursed by Consultant prior to the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Invoices shall be mailed to City at the following address: City of Santa Ana, Public Works Agency M-36, 20 Civic Center Plaza, P.O. Box 1988, Santa Ana, CA 92702. k. The period of performance for Task Orders shall be in accordance with dates specified in the Task Order. No Task Order will be written which extends beyond the expiration date of this Agreement. l. The total amount payable by City for an individual Task Order shall not exceed the amount agreed to in the Task Order, unless authorized by contract amendment. m. If the Consultant fails to satisfactorily complete a deliverable according to the schedule set forth in a Task Order, no payment will be made until the deliverable has been satisfactorily completed.n. Task Orders may not be used to amend this Agreement and may not exceed the scope of work under this Agreement. o.p. The total amount payable by City for all Task Orders resulting from this Agreement shall not exceed the aggregate amount discussed above. It is understood and agreed that there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied, that this dollar amount will be authorized under this Agreement through Task Orders. q. Consultant shall submit progress reports on each specific project in accordance with the Task Order. These reports shall be submitted at least once a month. The report should be sufficiently detailed for the City’s Project Manager to determine, if Consultant is performing to expectations, or is on schedule; to provide communication of interim findings, and to sufficiently address any difficulties or special problems encountered, so remedies can be developed. r. Consultant’s Project Manager shall meet with City’s Project Manager, as needed, to discuss progress on the project(s). s. This Agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available to the City for the purpose of this Agreement. In addition, this Agreement is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by Congress, the State Legislature, or the City that may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this Agreement in any manner 3. COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS a. Consultant agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR Part 31, Contract Cost Principals and Procedures, shall be used to determine the allowability of individual terms of cost. et seq., shall be used to determine the cost allowability of individual items.

City Council
14 –
6 7/21/2026

b. Consultant agrees to comply with federal procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. c. Any costs for which payment has been made to Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200 and 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., are subject to repayment by Consultant to City. 4. PERFORMANCE PERIOD a. This Agreement shall go into effect on July 21, 2026, contingent upon approval by City, and Consultant shall commence work after notification to proceed by City. This Agreement shall end on July 20, 2027, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 21, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for up to four (4), 1-year periods upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. b. Consultant is advised that any recommendation for contract award is not binding on City until the Agreement is fully executed and approved by City. c. The period of performance for each specific project shall be in accordance with the Task Order for that project. If work on a Task Order is in progress on the expiration date of this Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall be extended by amendment. 5. STATE PREVAILING WAGE RATES a. If applicable, Consultant shall comply with the State of California’s General Prevailing Wage Rate requirements in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1770, and all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work. b. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this Agreement, if for more than $25,000 for public works construction or more than $15,000 for the alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance of public works, shall contain all of the provisions of this Section, unless the awarding agency has an approved labor compliance program by the Director of Industrial Relations. c. When prevailing wages apply to the services described in the scope of work, transportation and subsistence costs shall be reimbursed at the minimum rates set by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as outlined in the applicable Prevailing Wage Determination. See http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall be responsible for any future adjustments to prevailing wage rates including, but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations, Consultant is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement.

City Council
14 –
7 7/21/2026

d. When prevailing rates apply, the Consultant is responsible for verifying compliance with certified payroll requirements. Invoice payment will not be made until the invoice is approved by City. 6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultantperforms the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 7. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk. 8. INSURANCE Insurance requirements attached hereto as Exhibit D. 9. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and

City Council
14 –
8 7/21/2026

hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultantfurther agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 10. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 11. RETENTION OF RECORDS/ AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES a. For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance of this Agreement, pursuant to Government Code 8546.7, Consultant, subconsultants, and City shall maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the Agreement, including but not limited to, the costs of administering the Agreement. All parties shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the Agreement period and for three years from the date of final payment under the Agreement. The state, State Auditor, City, FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal Government shall have access to any books, records, and documents of Consultant and its certified public accountants work papers that are pertinent to the contract and indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, workpaper review, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall befurnished if requested. b. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this Agreement that is not disposed of by mutual agreement shall be reviewed by the City. c. Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may request a review by the City of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing, submitted to the project manager of RFP. d. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by City will excuse Consultant from full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

City Council
14 –
9 7/21/2026

12. CONFIDENTIALITYIf Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultant without an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 13. CERTIFICATIONS The funds used to pay for this Agreement will be partly comprised of federal grant funds. Consultant agrees and understands that it will comply with the terms of the Certifications included below in Section 21, as well as all additional certifications included in RFP No. 26-059A, incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Consultant shall keep itself informed of all City, State and Federal laws and regulations which may, in any manner, affect the performance of it services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall at all times, observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. City and its officers and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity by reason of the failure of the Consultant to comply with this paragraph. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE a. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, agent, or board member with a real or apparent conflict of interest may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by the Federal award. A conflict of interest includes when the employee, officer, agent, or board member, any member of their immediate family, their partner, or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a contract. An employee, officer, agent, and board member of the recipient or subrecipient may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors. However, the recipient or subrecipient may set standards for situations where the financial interest is not substantial or a gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The recipient's or subrecipient's standards of conduct must also provide for disciplinary actions to be applied for violations by its employees, officers, agents, or board members.

City Council
14 –
10 7/21/2026

b. If the recipient or subrecipient has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian Tribe, the recipient or subrecipient must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest mean that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the recipient or subrecipient is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. c. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. d. No immediate family members of either the Mayor, City Council Member, or any appointed City Official, including appointed board and commission members, as defined under the City’s Municipal Code, whose position with the City shall award or influence the award of this Agreement, or any competing contract or amendment thereof, shall be employed in any capacity by the Consultant or have any other direct or indirect financial benefit or interest in this Agreement. e. The section also prohibits the awarding of any agreement, contract, grant, or any amendment to those awards, to any former full-time employee for one-year from date of employee separation except for any CalPERS retiree as authorized by City Council resolution f. The Consultant must comply with all conflict of interest laws, ordinances, and regulations now in effect or hereafter to be enacted during the term of this Agreement. The Consultant warrants that it is not now aware of any facts which conflict with the prohibitions defined above. If the Consultant hereafter becomes aware of any facts that might reasonably be expected to create a conflict of interest, it must immediately make full written disclosure of such facts to the City. Full written disclosure must include, but is not limited to, identification of all persons implicated and a complete description of all relevant circumstances. Failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph will be a material breach of this Agreement. g. Consultant covenants that none of its directors, officers, employees, or agents shall participate in selecting or administrating any subcontract supported (in whole or in part) by City funds stemming from the Agreement where the awarding of the subcontract has any direct or indirect financial benefit or interest to any individual, as defined in subsections (d) and (e) above. 15. REBATES, KICKBACKS, OR OTHER UNLAWFUL CONSIDERATION Consultant warrants that this Agreement was not obtained or secured through rebates kickbacks or other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any City employee. For

City Council
14 –
11 7/21/2026

breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right in its discretion; to terminate the contract without liability; to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or to deduct from the contract price; or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration. 16. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 17. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE a. Prior authorization in writing by City shall be required before Consultant enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or subcontract exceeding $5,000 for supplies, equipment, or consultant services. Consultant shall provide an evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such costs. b. For purchase of any item, service or consulting work not covered in Consultant’s Cost Proposal and exceeding $5,000 prior authorization by City, three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified. c. Any equipment purchased as a result of this Agreement is subject to the following condition: “Consultant shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property. Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is sold or traded in, City shall receive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of the Agreement, or if the Agreement is terminated, Consultant may either keep the equipment and credit City in an amount equal to its fair market value, or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in accordance with established City procedures and credit City in an amount equal to the sales price. If Consultant elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be determined at Consultant’s expense, based on a competent independent appraisal of such equipment. Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by City and Consultant. If it is determined to sell the equipment, the terms and conditions of such sale must be approved in advance by City.” 2 CFR, Part 200 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating equipment with a fair market value greater than $5,000 is credited to the project. 18. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In

City Council
14 –
12 7/21/2026

the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 19. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City. 20. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultantcompensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant todeliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such casesuch work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.21. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in orgranted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 22. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that

City Council
14 –
13 7/21/2026

Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 23. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 24. FEDERAL REGULATIONSConsultant shall comply with all applicable contractual provisions required by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as set for the in 2 CRF Part 200, whether or not expressly set forth in this document, including but not limited to those provisions set forth below. Notwithstanding, anything to the contrary herein, including without limitation, the language in this Agreement, the actual language contained in federal statutes, federal regulations, federally promulgated materials and state statutes, shall control in determining any obligations under federal law in the event of a conflict with any terms, language or provisions contained in this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any requests, which would cause City to be in violation of the federal terms and conditions. a. Federal Regulations – Recipient must comply with the government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements and audit requirements for federal grant program housed within Title 2, Part 180 of the Code of Federal Regulations. b. Debarment and Suspension – As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 CFR §200.214 and codified in 2 CFR Part 200, Recipient must provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealingswith the Federal government. c. Audit Records – With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by CITY, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the City of Santa Ana. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Recipient shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Recipient shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Recipient, upon request during usual working hours. d. Reports – Recipient shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for

City Council
14 –
14 7/21/2026

inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies. e. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) – All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Recipient agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be binding on all of its contractors, subcontractors, assignees or successors. f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 – (ADA) Recipient must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable.g. Political Activity – None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act".h. No Lobbying – Recipient will comply with all applicable lobbying prohibitions and laws, including those found in the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352, et seq.), and agrees that none of the funds provided under this award may be expended by the Recipient to pay any person to influence, or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any federal action concerning the award or renewal of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. i. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, as amended; Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, as amended; Section 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912, as amended; Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Recipient makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Recipient will forward a copy of the findings to CITY which will, in turn, submit the findings to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. If applicable, recipient will comply with the equal opportunity clause in 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375.

City Council
14 –
15 7/21/2026

j. Equal Employment Opportunity – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as applicable.k. Public Contracts Code – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the California Public Contract Code Section 10295.3, as applicable. l. Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable. m. David-Bacon Act – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144 and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. n. Work Hours and Safety – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. o. Clean Air Act – 1. The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. 2. The contractor agrees to report each violation to CITY and understands and agrees that the CITY will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office. 3. The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FEMA. p. Energy and Conservation – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201), as applicable. q. Waste Disposal – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as applicable. r. Patent Rights – Recipient agrees that the Department of Homeland Security shall have the authority to seek patent rights for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid

City Council
14 –
16 7/21/2026

for with funding through this Agreement based on the requirements of 37 CFR§ 401 and any other implementing regulations, as applicable. s. Copyright – Recipient may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and/or City purpose: (1) the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and (2) any rights of copyright to which the subcontractor purchases ownership with support through this grant. The Federal government’s, SAA’s and City’s rights identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the publisher’s release form must ensure the preservation of these rights. t. Equal Employment in Construction Contracts – Pursuant to Equal Employment Opportunity requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, as to any construction contract thereunder, if applicable, during the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: (1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals

City Council
14 –
17 7/21/2026

who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information. (4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. u. Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.216. Recipient will comply with FEMA Policy 405-143-1, Prohibitions on Expending FEMA Award Funds on Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services (Interim), which prohibits grant recipients and subrecipients from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to procure or obtain, extend or

City Council
14 –
18 7/21/2026

renew a contract to procure or obtain, or to enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system. As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment: (1) Telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (2) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (3) Telecommunications or video surveillance services produced by such entities or using such equipment. (4) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. v. Domestic Preferences for Procurements/Subcontracts – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.322. Recipient shall comply with the federal and recipient standards in the award of any subcontracts. For purposes of this Agreement, subcontracts shall include but not be limited to purchase agreements, rental or lease agreements, third party agreements, consultant service contracts and construction subcontracts. Recipient shall ensure that the terms of this Agreement with the CITY are incorporated into all Subcontractor Agreements. The recipient shall submit all Subcontractor Agreements to the CITY for review prior to the release of any funds to the subcontractor. The recipient shall withhold funds to any subcontractor agency that fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and their respective Subcontractor Agreement.(1) Recovered Materials Recipient shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance schedule; Meeting contract performance requirements; or at a reasonable price.

City Council
14 –
19 7/21/2026

Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines webpage: https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. The Contractor also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. (2) Domestic Preference for Procurements Recipient should, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States. This includes, but is not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products. For purposes of this clause: Produced in the United States means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Manufactured products mean items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber. w. Termination for Cause and Convenience – Should recipient fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this agreement within the time specified by this Agreement, the CITY reserves the right to terminate the Agreement, reserving all rights under state and federal law. x. Contractual/Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract – Should recipient fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this Agreement and/or willfully, knowingly or negligently breach any term, condition or requirement of the agreement, City may impose sanctions including but not limited to damages (liquidated damages and or penalties) and /or any other remedy available pursuant to the Agreement of the laws then in effect. 25. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City:

City Council
14 –
20 7/21/2026

City ClerkCity of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988With courtesy copies to:Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21)P.O. Box 1988Santa Ana, California 92702To Consultant: Adam Charmaa, PE, GEPrincipal-in-Charge AESCO, Inc. 17782 Georgetown Lane Huntington Beach, CA 92647 A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 23. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.

City Council
14 –
21 7/21/2026

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA JENNIFER L. HALL ALVARO NUÑEZCity Clerk City ManagerAPPROVED AS TO FORM: CONSULTANT:SONIA R. CARVALHO City AttorneyBy: KYLE NELLESEN By:Assistant City Attorney Title:RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: RODOLFO ROSAS, P.E.Acting Executive DirectorPublic Works Agency Nadra MatarVice President

City Council
14 –
22 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT A

City Council
14 –
23 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The City of Santa Ana (City) is seeking proposals from qualified firms and organizations (Proposers) to provide on-call materials testing and special inspections services. Under the City of Santa Anas Capital Improvement Program, a number of construction projects will take place in the next few years. These projects include street pavement, traffic signals, underground utilities, buildings, bridges, and park facility improvements. The total value of construction is estimated to exceed $150 million. In order to maintain high quality of construction, the City intends to retain testing and inspection firms to provide quality assurance services for those projects. The selected firms are expected to provide testing and inspections for construction activities involving grading, soils, base material, concrete, masonry, asphalt concrete, structural steel, reinforcing steel, painting and to provide other quality assurance services when required. The purpose of this RFP is to solicit proposals from quality control consulting firms for the required services. The selected consultant is expected to enter into an agreement with the City to provide services on an as-needed basis. The resulting agreement(s) will be locally and federally funding. Funding sources for each project may vary and shall comply with the funding agencys requirements. Special conditions may apply. State and Federal grant funds administered by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) will be used to fund all or a portion of these projects. The successful proposer will be required to comply with all requirements associated with federal funding in carrying out the project. The Caltrans Requirements referenced in Attachment K of this RFP provides additional information on federal funding requirements. All proposals, plans, drawings, specifications, estimates, grant applications, modeling, studies, presentations, and/or reports will be subject to the final approval and satisfaction of the City. The selected consultants must have the expertise, experience, and demonstrated resources available to perform the work described in this RFP. Prime consultant mark-ups for sub-consultant work will not be allowed. Scope of Services The required services shall include, but not be limited to the following: 1. Provide field inspections and compaction tests for grading, trench backfill and asphalt concrete pavement construction according to the project special provisions, the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book) and Caltrans Standard Specifications. Submit daily field reports to the City and a final report after work is completed. 2. Provide inspections for installation of precast and cast-in-place concrete, welding, high strength bolts, structural steel, masonry, painting and other types of work in accordance with the California Building Code (CBC) and the contract documents. Submit field reports to the City immediately after inspections are completed. All deputy inspectors shall register with the Citys Planning and Building Agency prior to starting inspection.

EXHIBIT 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

City Council
14 –
24 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

3. Perform test on various construction materials as required by the City. Available tests may include the following: a. Mix Designs b. Concrete c. Concrete Blocks d. Brick Masonry e. Masonry Prisms f. Mortar and Grout g. Fireproofing h. Soils and Aggregates i. Asphalt Concrete j. Reinforcing Steel k. Environmental 4. Inspectors who perform work in confined areas or at elevated levels shall be certified or trained for confined space and fall protection. 5. Recommend testing method on defective work and advise the City of acceptance standards. 6. Provide source inspection for concrete and asphalt concrete at mixing plants, and inspection for other materials at their source as required by the project specifications. 7. Provide other quality control services as requested by the City. 8. Field reports shall be submitted daily to the City. Submit and distribute typed inspection and testing reports to the Citys Public Works Agency and the Planning and Building Agency in accordance with Green Book and CBC requirements and to other concerned parties within a week after the work is performed. 9. Submit a final report to the City within five working days upon completion of each project. 10. May develop and implement procedures for the review and processing of applications by contractor for progress and final payments. Proposers Construction Manager will be responsible for reviewing and approving monthly progress payments, and make recommendations for certification to City Staff for payment. 11. Act as an advisor to the City throughout construction and commission of the project. Determine that the work of contractor is being performed in accordance with the contract documents. Make recommendations to the City regarding special inspection or testing of work not in compliance with the provisions of the contract documents. Subject to review by the City, reject work which does not conform to the requirements of contract documents. 12. The individuals, Construction Manager, Inspector and Contract Administrator, shall not be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures employed by the contractor in the performance of the contract, and shall not be responsible for the failure of the contractor to carry out work in accordance with the contract documents. However, any errors, omissions, or discrepancies found in the Contract Documents shall be called to the attention of City Staff and clarified prior to construction starts.

City Council
14 –
25 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

13. Consult with the City when the contractor requests interpretations of the meaning and intent of the drawings and specifications, and assist in achieving the resolution of problems, which may arise. 14. Record the progress of the project. Submit written daily and progress reports to the City. Keep daily logs containing a record of weather, contractor's work on the site, number of workers and equipment, work accomplished, problems encountered, and other relevant data. Make the log available to the City. Prepare and send Weekly Statement of Working Days to the contractor. Monitor contractor's compliance with labor code requirements. 15. Maintain, at the job site, records of contract documents including drawings, addenda, change orders, and other modifications of plans and specifications marked to show all changes made during construction. Maintain as-built records of underground utilities, including locations and depths of trenches. At the completion of the project, deliver to the City all contract documents including as- built records. 16. Evaluate the completion of the work of the contractor and make recommendations to the City when work: is ready for final inspection. Assist the City in conducting final inspections. 17. Facilitate and coordinate inspection by representatives of other agencies. 18. Assist City with project budget tracking by funding source to ensure progress payment applications are applied appropriately to correct funding sources. 19. Assist City with submission of narrative and financial reports on the progress and activities of the project to grant agencies 20. Shall monitor and enforce prevailing wage forms and requirements for conformance to the prevailing wage rates on a weekly basis. Shall verify that all Trade personnel listed in the daily log are also listed in the certified payroll and shall conduct weekly employee interviews, one for each trade, and submit verification with the monthly progress payments. 21. Shall coordinate and assist the Citys Community Work Force Agreement (CWA) Consultant to monitor and enforce the CWA forms and requirements to ensure compliance. Verification should be provided with the monthly progress payments. 22. The Proposers Constructor Manager shall be responsible for all project closeout items, such as: As-Built plans and related documentation, punch list completion, commissioning, warranty requests during the one-year period. Shall schedule and oversee the warranty repair. Should include site visits as requested by the City to look at defects or imperfection to determine if it is a warranty issue. 23. The Proposers Construction Manager shall also provide material testing and inspection to provide quality assurance services for the project. Expected testing and inspection for construction activities may involve grading, soils, base material, concrete, masonry, asphalt concrete, structural elements, and other quality assurance services as required. All frequency of services shall be in accordance with the City of Santa Ana Quality Assurance Program provided in Exhibit 6. The City reserve the right to add or reduce some of the above tasks and duties as it sees fit. The Consultant, serving as staff extension, shall remain sufficiently flexible to meet the needs of the City and of the project.

City Council
14 –
26 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

NOTICE TO PROCEED: On-Call contracts require the City Project Managers to request a project/task proposal from Consultants on an as-needed basis. Proposals will then be evaluated by City Staff and written NTPs will be issued accordingly per task order. PAYMENT AND INVOICING: Selected Consultant shall invoice the City based on time and material according to the Citys standard invoice template. Tasks and hours shall be clearly identified and all rates must match those included in the approved agreement. This agreement may utilize Federal, Caltrans, Comprehensive Transportation Funding Program (CTFP) and local funds. Proposer shall comply with all requirements as they pertain to use of these funds. FEE SCHEDULES: In addition to Section V. Proposal Response Instructions, 2. Cost Proposal, fee schedules shall be structured to correspond to the above mentioned tasks as follows: Task: Construction Management and Inspection Services - Subtasks Total Fee: _____________ Fee schedule for each task should include an hourly breakdown that corresponds to the task total. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES: The City will provide information in its possession relevant to the preparation of the required information in the RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and the documentation specifically in referred to herein. Provide general direction as needed for the assigned project Advertise, award, and execution of construction contract Electronic files (sample plans & specifications, City of Santa Anas Computer Aided Design and Drafting Standards) Electronic files for title sheets and sheet borders Facilitate meeting space and coordination and City facilities Facilitate City Permits

City Council
14 –
27 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT B

City Council
14 –
28 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
29 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
30 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
31 7/21/2026

Orange County17782 Georgetown LaneMay 21, 2026Christopher Plutte, Senior Civil EngineerCity of Santa Ana – Public Works Agency20 Civic Center Plaza, M-22Santa Ana, CA 92701RE: Proposal for RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection ServicesDear Mr. Plutte, The City of Santa Ana’s active capital improvement program requires more than standard testing and inspection services—it requires a responsive partner with deep public works experience, strong field leadership, and the ability to consistently deliver accurate, defensible, and timely results across multiple concurrent projects. AESCO, Inc. brings exactly this experience to the City’s On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services program.For more than 15 years, AESCO has served the City of Santa Ana as a trusted prime consultant, providing geotechnical engineering, materials testing, special inspections, hazardous materials support, and construction quality assurance services for roadway, utility, bridge, stormwater, park, and public facility improvement projects throughout the City. This longstanding partnership has provided our team with extensive familiarity with Santa Ana’s construction standards, inspection procedures, reporting requirements, and project delivery expectations—allowing us to integrate seamlessly with City staff and respond efficiently without disruption or learning curve. WHY AESCO STANDS APARTAESCO is not simply a testing laboratory or inspection provider—we operate as a fully integrated quality assurance and construction support partner. Our differentiators include:• and coordination procedures developed through continuous City support since 2011• with ICC-certified inspectors, AWS-certified welding inspectors, engineers, laboratory personnel, and field staff capable of supporting multiple concurrent task orders and urgent project needs• Integrated Engineering, Testing, and Inspection Services that streamline coordination and project delivery• supporting wage monitoring, certified payroll review, grant documentation, and CWA coordination•with experienced personnel capable of proactive field coordination and real-time issue resolutionAESCO’s approach is built on long-term partnerships with public agencies throughout Southern California, including including Huntington Beach, Santa Ana, Anaheim, West Hollywood, and Buena Park. These relationships reflect AESCO’s consistent responsiveness, technical accuracy, and dependable project support.The City of Santa Ana has trusted AESCO for more than 15 years because we consistently provide experienced personnel, responsive service, and reliable project support. We value that partnership and remain committed to helping the City successfully deliver its growing capital improvement program.Thank you for your consideration and the opportunity to continue serving the City of Santa Ana.Sincerely,AESCO, Inc.Adam Chamaa, PE, GE Kay AlabedGeotechnical Program Director President

City Council
14 –
32 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
33 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services B. Services Provided I Page 1
B: SERVICES PROVIDEDAESCO, Inc. will provide comprehensive on-call materials testing, special inspection, geotechnical engineering, and construction quality assurance services in support of the City of Santa Ana’s Capital Improvement Program projects. Our team understands the City requires responsive, technically sound, and well-coordinated support services capable of supporting multiple concurrent public works projects, including roadway rehabilitation, underground utilities, stormwater infrastructure, bridges, parks, public facilities, and federally funded improvements. Core ServicesServices provided by AESCO include:• • • related building components• • • • Support for federally funded and Caltrans-funded projects, including prevailing wage compliance monitoring, • where required• What Sets AESCO ApartAESCO’s integrated approach combines experienced field personnel, responsive project management, in-house laboratory capabilities, and senior-level engineering oversight to provide the City with efficient, accurate, and dependable quality assurance services throughout construction. Our Southern California-based team is structured to provide rapid mobilization, flexible scheduling, continuity of personnel, and consistent support for both planned and urgent assignments.Unlike firms that operate solely as testing laboratories, AESCO provides integrated engineering, inspection, testing, hazardous materials support, and construction quality assurance services under one coordinated team—streamlining communication, improving responsiveness, and reducing delays during active construction. Proven City of Santa Ana ExperienceFor more than 15 years, AESCO has successfully supported the City of Santa Ana on roadway rehabilitation, utility, bridge, stormwater, park, and public facility improvement projects, including the First Street Bridge Replacement Project, MacArthur Boulevard Rehabilitation, Residential Street Repair Programs, S. Main Corridor Improvements, and numerous additional City infrastructure improvements.Through this longstanding partnership, AESCO has consistently provided rapid field response, dependable staffing support, timely reporting, and coordinated quality assurance services across multiple concurrent City projects. This direct experience provides our team with extensive familiarity with the City’s standards, procedures, documentation expectations, and project delivery requirements—allowing AESCO to integrate seamlessly into ongoing assignments and provide responsive support with minimal onboarding or disruption.

City Council
14 –
34 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
35 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services C. Firm and Team Experience I Page 2
Founded in 1993, AESCO is a Southern for public works and infrastructure projects throughout California. Services include support in accordance with Caltrans, CBC, Green Book, ASTM, and AASHTO standards. municipal on-call programs throughout Southern California, including long-standing Beach, Santa Ana, Anaheim, and West Hollywood. Our team supports roadway, facility improvement projects requiring AESCO is structured to support projects of varying scale and complexity with senior-level Core ServicesGeotechnical engineering and geologic services Hazardous materials assessment, asbestos/lead funded project support On-call program support, including rapid FIRM OVERVIEW AESCO, Inc. is a Southern California-based geotechnical engineering, municipal infrastructure projects throughout California. AESCO provides projects. and technical professionals who have been trained in AESCO’s QA/QC OFFICE LOCATIONS Nearest Office Serving the City of Santa Ana: Corporate Headquarters: SUPERVISING PROJECT MANAGER / PRINCIPAL AGENT The primary point of contact and supervising Project Manager for this agreement will be: Omar Chamaa, PE | Project Manager AESCO, Inc. Email: [email protected] yearsworking in Southern California32C: FIRM AND TEAM EXPERIENCE

City Council
14 –
36 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services C. Firm and Team Experience I Page 3
AESCO maintains single-point accountability through the Project Manager, ensuring clear communication, consistent decision-making, and full responsibility for staffing, deliverables, schedule coordination, quality control, and subconsultant management. The Project Manager will serve as the City’s primary contact and will lead presentations or interviews, if requested by the City.STAFFING CAPACITY AND AVAILABILITY AESCO is structured to support multiple concurrent task orders with varying scopes, schedules, and levels of urgency. Our team can rapidly mobilize field and laboratory personnel, scale resources based on task order size and complexity, and maintain continuity across assignments without compromising quality or responsiveness. AESCO’s long-standing on-call relationships with Southern California public agencies demonstrate our ability to respond quickly, manage fluctuating workloads, and deliver consistent results across multiple projects simultaneously.SUBCONSULTANT INTEGRATION AESCO intends to self-perform the majority of materials testing, special inspection, geotechnical engineering, hazardous materials assessment, asbestos/lead sampling, and abatement inspection services with in-house staff, ensuring direct control over quality, communication, responsiveness, and schedule. If specialized services are required, such as specialty laboratory analysis or niche technical support, AESCO will engage qualified, pre-vetted subconsultants on an as-needed basis. All subconsultants will be managed directly by AESCO and held to the same performance standards, documentation protocols, responsiveness, and quality expectations as AESCO staff, maintaining single-point accountability to the City throughout project delivery.KEY PERSONNEL COMMITMENT AESCO understands the importance of continuity for on-call assignments. Key personnel identified for this agreement will remain committed to supporting the City throughout the contract term to maintain project knowledge, streamline coordination, and provide consistent service to City staff. If a substitution becomes necessary due to circumstances beyond AESCO’s control or at the City’s direction, AESCO will propose a replacement with equal or greater qualifications and experience and will obtain prior written approval from the City.KEY PERSONNEL OVERVIEW AESCO’s proposed team includes experienced professionals with extensive backgrounds in materials testing, special inspection, geotechnical engineering, hazardous materials support, construction quality assurance, and public agency project delivery. The team is structured to provide clear lines of responsibility, senior-level oversight, rapid mobilization, and consistent communication across all task orders. Key roles include:• Principal-in-Charge — Provides executive oversight, ensures contract compliance, and serves as an escalation point for City leadership.• Serves as the City’s primary point of contact and is responsible for task order execution, staffing, schedule, budget, communication, and quality assurance.• Senior Geotechnical Engineer(s) — Provide technical oversight for geotechnical evaluations, recommendations, field issues, and engineering review.• Materials Testing & Special Inspection Manager — Coordinates field and laboratory testing services, assigns inspectors and technicians, and confirms compliance with project specifications, ASTM standards, CBC requirements, Green Book requirements, and Caltrans standards.• Oversees laboratory testing procedures, equipment calibration, quality control, and timely delivery of test results.• Perform field density testing, concrete sampling, asphalt testing, reinforcement inspection, masonry inspection, structural observation, and related materials testing services.• Supports scheduling, document control, reporting, invoicing, and coordination across multiple concurrent task orders.

City Council
14 –
37 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services C. Firm and Team Experience I Page 4
TEAM MEMBER QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE and experience. This overview serves as a quick reference for each individual’s role, years of experience, and areas of OMAR CHAMAA, PENADRA MATARADAM CHAMAA, PE, GE20 Years Experience20 Years in Geotechnical, Material Testing & Inspection5,000+ Testing and Inspection projects20 Years Experience10 Years in Material Testing and Inspection$2B+ Completed Projects projectsprojects35 Years Experience35 Years in Program/Construction Management10,000+ Geotechnical ProjectsOver 20 years of diverse Specialized Experience: Specializes in services. Communicates transparency throughout project development process.Project Management: Led as Project Manager Project Diversity: Extensive experience providing services on Caltrans, Metro, on-call projects, and OCTA projects.Team Building: Assembled a cohesive team where each member’s unique talents approach.Broad Project Roles: Managed pivotal roles in Southern California on-call projects, spanning Key Project Oversight: Led QA/QC for Perris Valley Line, SR-91 Freeway Widening and Santa Ana. Where valuable, Adam will cost and shorten schedule or enhance the life cycle.

City Council
14 –
38 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services C. Firm and Team Experience I Page 5
GIOVANNIMIKHAILDAVIDRYAN, PEJUDDCHAMAA17 YearsExperience15Construction ManagementProjects80 Testing & Inspection Projects40 YearsExperience30 Years in QualityControl20+Vertical ConstructionProjects10 YearsExperience10 ConstructionProjects$3BConstructionProjectsOver 15 years specializing in concrete, steel, and infrastructure projects.Registered civil Specialized Experience: Project coordinator Project Diversity: Extensive experience in projects.Project Management: Senior Engineer overseeing diverse projects, including water mains, and pumping plants.Project Diversity: Extensive experience Southern California.Key Project Oversight:Widening of 91 Freeway, Sand Canyon Grade Quality Control: Managed laboratory quality control for major infrastructure projects, ensuring compliance.Key Project Oversight:facility projects.

AESCO’S PROJECT ORGANIZATION AESCO has assembled a dedicated team of experienced project managers, licensed engineers, certified inspectors, laboratory personnel, and field technicians specifically structured to support the City of Santa Ana’s on-call materials testing, special inspection, geotechnical engineering, and construction quality assurance needs. Our organizational structure emphasizes clear communication, rapid response, senior-level oversight, and scalable staffing to efficiently support multiple concurrent task orders while maintaining consistent quality, coordination, and accountability throughout project delivery.The following organizational chart illustrates AESCO’s integrated project management structure, key personnel assignments, technical support resources, and quality assurance oversight approach for this agreement.

City Council
14 –
39 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services C. Firm and Team Experience I Page 6

City Council
14 –
40 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services C. Firm and Team Experience I Page 7
PROJECT MANAGEMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY AESCO maintains single-point accountability through consistent decision-making, and full responsibility for assurance, and subconsultant management. The on task order size, complexity, and urgency without STAFFING CAPACITY & AVAILABILITYorders with varying scopes, schedules, and levels of urgency. Our Southern California-based team can rapidly Southern California, AESCO has demonstrated the ability and consistently deliver reliable project support across QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROLAESCO implements a structured QA/QC process for all deliverables. Project managers and senior technical personnel conduct independent reviews of reports, compliance with project requirements, City standards, Caltrans requirements, and applicable codes. This process RAPID RESPONSE & COMMUNICATIONAESCO understands that successful on-call programs City’s primary point of contact and provides ongoing delivery and minimize delays.

TEAM CONTINUITY & STAFFING DEPTHAESCO’s proposed team has worked together for more task orders.inspectors and technicians available to support on-call resources, respond to urgent requests, and maintain TECHNICAL STAFF & INSPECTION PERSONNELinspectors, and hazardous materials professionals with and public works projects throughout Southern California.and earthwork, reinforced concrete, asphalt concrete, by senior management oversight to maintain quality, consistency, and responsiveness.BACK-UP PERSONNEL & CONTINUITY OF SERVICEAESCO understands the importance of uninterrupted service delivery under an on-call contract. In the event key personnel become unavailable due to unforeseen service requirements.

City Council
14 –
41 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
42 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services D. Proposed Work Plan I Page 8
D: PROPOSED WORK PLAN UNDERSTANDING OF THE SCOPE OF SERVICESAESCO understands the City of Santa Ana requires responsive, technically sound, and well-coordinated on-call materials projects throughout the City. These projects include roadway and federally funded infrastructure projects that require rapid and project stakeholders. AESCO also understands that successful delivery of these services depends on more than technical capability alone. The City requires while maintaining compliance with City standards, Caltrans requirements, Greenbook standards, CBC requirements, project the learning curve typically associated with new consultant onboarding.SCOPE ALIGNMENT WITH CITY REQUIREMENTSquality assurance needs. Our integrated in-house team structure, long-standing municipal on-call experience, and ability to rapidly concurrent public works projects. The following table summarizes

City Council
14 –
43 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services D. Proposed Work Plan I Page 9
This alignment allows AESCO to provide the City with a coordinated, responsive, and technically sound team

City Council
14 –
44 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services D. Proposed Work Plan I Page 10
AESCO’S APPROACH TO PERFORMING SERVICEStechnical accuracy, and single-point accountability. The Project Manager will serve as the City’s primary point of contact and will oversee all task Upon receipt of a task order request, AESCO will immediately coordinate geotechnical personnel, hazardous materials specialists, and QA/QC Our team is structured to rapidly mobilize for both scheduled and AESCO’s long-standing municipal on-call experience has demonstrated the Success Story: City of Santa Ana – Residential Street Repair Programs (Phases 15–17)AESCO provided on-call materials testing, special inspection, geotechnical engineering, and construction QA/QC services for multiple Residential Street Repair Program phases throughout the City of Santa Ana. The projects included roadway rehabilitation, pavement reconstruction, utility trench restoration, grading, asphalt paving, and compaction testing across multiple active construction zones citywide. AESCO provided rapid-response materials testing, subgrade inspection, asphalt testing, reinforced concrete inspection, QA/QC documentation, and construction coordination services to support aggressive construction schedules and minimize disruption to surrounding neighborhoods. Through this long-standing on-call partnership, AESCO consistently supported successful delivery of the City’s roadway rehabilitation program by helping maintain construction quality, schedule coordination, and compliance with City standards and project concurrent public works assignments.

City Council
14 –
45 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services D. Proposed Work Plan I Page 11

City Council
14 –
46 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services D. Proposed Work Plan I Page 12
PROVEN ON-CALL PERFORMANCE FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANAAESCO has successfully supported the City of Santa Ana’s Capital Improvement Program for more than 15 years, • Provided materials testing, structural inspection, compaction testing, and construction quality assurance services for bridge and roadway improvements under active traffic and complex public infrastructure conditions.• Supported multiple roadway rehabilitation and paving operations throughout the City, including subgrade evaluation, asphalt testing, utility trench backfill testing, and rapid-response field inspection services to maintain aggressive construction schedules and minimize disruption to surrounding neighborhoods.• Provided testing, inspection, and construction support services for critical utility infrastructure projects involving deep excavations, groundwater conditions, reinforced concrete systems, trenching operations, and utility coordination.• Oversees laboratory testing procedures, equipment calibration, quality control, and timely delivery of test results.• Supported large-scale roadway and utility improvement projects requiring coordination across multiple trades, traffic control operations, phased construction sequencing, utility conflicts, and ongoing QA/QC oversight during active construction. POTENTIAL CHALLENGES & AESCO’S SOLUTIONS

City Council
14 –
47 7/21/2026

AESCO
RFP No. 26-059A – On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services D. Proposed Work Plan I Page 13
This proactive approach allows AESCO to minimize project risk, maintain schedule continuity, support informed decision-making, and help the City successfully deliver complex infrastructure projects efficiently and safely. DELIVERABLES & IMPLEMENTATION PLANDeliverables may include:• • • • • • • • • emergency assignments without delay.

City Council
14 –
48 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT C

City Council
14 –
49 7/21/2026

Item $/Unit UnitPrincipal Professional Engineer 240.00$ HourSenior Geotechnical Engineer 225.00$ HourProject Engineer / Manager 195.00$ HourGeologist 205.00$ HourQuality Control Manager 195.00$ HourSenior Staff Engineer 185.00$ HourHealth and Safety Officer 225.00$ HourLA City Deputy Methane Specialist 165.00$ HourLaboratory Manager 155.00$ HourLaboratory Technician 125.00$ HourCADD Operator/Draftsperson 105.00$ HourData Processing, Technical Editing or Reproduction 105.00$ HourExpert Witness Testimony 510.00$ HourCertified Payroll, per hr. 185.00$ HourSenior Staff Environmental Engineer 185.00$ HourSenior Environmental Engineer 225.00$ HourItem $/Unit UnitSpecial Inspector (Reinforced Concrete, and Masonry) 130.00$ HourSpecial Inspector (Structural Steel, DrilledInAnchors 130.00$ HourSpecial Inspector for Welding 130.00$ HourDSA Class I Inspector 150.00$ HourDSA Class II Inspector 140.00$ HourSpecial Inspector for Fireproofing 130.00$ HourSpecial Inspector Load Tests or Torque/Bolt) 130.00$ HourSpecial Inspector Rebar Sample 130.00$ HourSpecial Inspector Pachometer 130.00$ HourSenior Asphalt Placement Technician 130.00$ HourAsphalt Placement Technician 130.00$ HourAsphalt/Concrete Plant Technician 130.00$ HourACI/Caltrans Technician 130.00$ HourSenior Soils Technician 130.00$ HourSenior Grading Inspector 135.00$ HourStaff Grading Inspector 130.00$ HourSoils Technician 130.00$ HourPile Driving Inspector 145.00$ HourAWS Certified Welding Inspector 130.00$ HourNACE Coating Inspector 160.00$ HourField Coring Technician 130.00$ HourNondestructive Examination Technician, UT, MT, LP 135.00$ HourStructural Steel Fabrication Inspector (AWS) 135.00$ Hour AESCO Annually Fixed Rate Fee ScheduleCity of Santa AnaRequest For Proposal (RFP) No. 26059AFor OnCall Materials Testing and Special Inspections ServicesProfessional StaffingField Technician

City Council
14 –
50 7/21/2026

Senior Environmental Technician 145.00$ HourEnvironmental Technician 145.00$ HourBuilding Inspector 150.00$ HourItem $/Unit UnitStructural Steel Inspector (ICC/CBO) 130.00$ HourStructural Steel Inspector (AWS) 130.00$ HourBatch Plant Quality Control Technician/Inspector 130.00$ HourReinforced Concrete, Prestressed Inspector 130.00$ HourField Inspector/Technician HoursNo Work Performed (Work Cancelled) will be charged at 2 hour minimumAll field services charge at 4 hour minimum and 8 hour thereafterRegular Work HoursFirst 8 hours, Monday through Friday, between 5:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.Direct Project expenses outside services will be charged at Cost + 15%.Time and OneHalfAny increment past first 8 hours through 12 hours, Monday through FridayFirst 12 hours on SaturdayShift between 3:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m.Double TimeAny hours past 12 hours Monday through Saturday, all day Sunday and Federal HolidaysItem $/Unit UnitSoil Boring with Hollow Stem Auger Drilling Portal to Portal580.00$ HourMobilization and Demobilization for Hollow Stem Auger 475.00$ HourBackfill Boreholes with Bentonite 25.00$ FootBackfill Boreholes with Grout 40.00$ FootDrumming and Disposal of Clean Cuttings 430.00$ DrumFire Water Buffalo 605.00$ DaySupport Truck 165.00$ DayWater Truck 495.00$ DayMobilization and Demobilization for Rock coring 1,270.00$ EachRock Coring 500.00$ HourDecontamination of Vehicle and Equipment (Up to 100 miles) 330.00$ EachField Resistivity, up to 3 arrays, maximum distance of 40 ft. 1,985.00$ EachEnvironmental Soil Boring with Hollow Stem Auger Portal to Portal 470.00$ HourEnvironmental Soil Boring with Direct Push Portal to Portal 420.00$ HourEnvironmental Groundwater Sampling with Grundfos, Portal to Portal 305.00$ HourEnvironmental Analysis of soil for waste classification Quote/SampleEnvironmental Analysis of liquid for waste classification Quote/SampleGround Resistance Tester (Four Point Method), plus travel 1,785.00$ EachPotholing, twoman crew 630.00$ HourGround Penetrating Radar (GPR) for Locating Utilities 1,575.00$ DaySkip Loader, min 4 hour, plus delivery 265.00$ HourItem $/Unit UnitReview of Concrete Mix Design 175.00$ Each Fabrication Shop Inspections
Field Analysis
Mix Design Review

City Council
14 –
51 7/21/2026

Review of Concrete Mix Design, per Trial Batch, 6 cylinder, ACI 265.00$ EachReview of Grout Mix Design 175.00$ EachReview of Mortar Mix Design 175.00$ EachReview of Asphalt Mix Design 220.00$ EachReview of Asphalt Mix Design, Caltrans 160.00$ EachItem $/Unit UnitAll hold samples are charged at the same rate as the testing rateTechnician for Specimen pick up, minimum 2 hours 125.00$ HourVehicle (Up to 100 miles) 80.00$ TripItem $/Unit UnitBrass Mold 20.00$ EachConcrete Air Meter 55.00$ DayConcrete Unit Weight (Scale, Bucket, Rod and Mallet) 35.00$ DayField Vehicle Usage (Up to 100 miles) 80.00$ TripConcrete/Asphalt Coring Equipment rental (min 4 hrs and 8 hrs after) 210.00$ HourFireproofing Adhesion/Cohesion 20.00$ TestHand Auger Equipment 140.00$ DayLevel D Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), per person 45.00$ DayLiquid Penetrating Consumables 35.00$ DayMagnetic Particle Equipment and Consumables 45.00$ DayUltrasonic Equipment and Consumables 70.00$ DayNuclear Density Gauge Usage 20.00$ HourCompaction Test, per location 20.00$ TestPortable Concrete Laboratorynot including Technicians$ Quote/DayPachometer (Rebar Locator) 60.00$ DayEnvironmental PID Usage 210.00$ DayPull Test Equipment 80.00$ DaySand Cone Test Kit (Scale, Burner, Sand Cone Apparatus) 190.00$ DaySchmidt Hammer 55.00$ DayTorque Wrench, Small 20.00$ DayTorque Wrench, Large 40.00$ DayTorque Multiplier (Skidmore) 100.00$ DayMiscellaneous Equipment Charge$ Quote EachVapor Emission Kit 60.00$ EachField Resistivity Meter 250.00$ DayWater Level Meter 85.00$ DayEnvironmental ph/Turbidity/Conductivity/Temp Meter 115.00$ DayEnvironmental FID Usage 115.00$ DayEnvironmental groundwater sampling pump 225.00$ DayXRF Lead Analyzer 850.00$ DayRelative Humidity 80.00$ DayGPR (Groud Penetrating Radar), for buried rebar in concrete 95.00$ HourLoad Cell for tensionMaximum 2,000 lb 60.00$ HourBarologger Solinst A/E 61160 190.00$ DayDrone Site Monitoring & Mapping 235.00$ DayEquipment for Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing per ASTM D3385 790.00$ DayEquipment for Standard Test Method for Permeability of Synthetic Turf Sports Field BasedStone and Surface System by Nonconfined Area Flood Test Method. ASTM F2898265.00$ Day Sample PickUp/HoldField Equipment Charges

City Council
14 –
52 7/21/2026

Minor Traffic Control Equipment for residential/minor or secondary collector (signs andcones)1,785.00$ DayZefon High Volume Air Sampling Pump160.00$ DayZefon Rotameter40.00$ DayPCM Air Cassettes15.00$ EachTEM Air Cassettes15.00$ EachGhost Wipes for surface sampling, including lead and beryllium testing5.00$ EachTEM Cassette, 25mm, Microvac for collection of fibers and particulate15.00$ EachAutomatic Pulloff Adhesion Tester (ASTM C1583)370.00$ Day50mm Dolly's for ASTM C158370.00$ EachItem $/Unit Unit6x12Cylinder: Compression Strength (ASTM C39) 40.00$ Test6x6x18Flexural Beams Not Exceeding Referenced Size (ASTM C78, C293, or CTM 523) 90.00$ TestCylinders: Splitting Tensile Strength (ASTM C496) 90.00$ TestCore Compression including Trimming (ASTM C39) 55.00$ TestConcrete Core Compression excludes sampling (C42) 60.00$ TestCoring of Test Panels in Lab 25.00$ EachDiamond Sawing of Cores or Cylinders (ASTM C642) 25.00$ TestDensity, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete (ASTM C642) 330.00$ TestModulus of Elasticity Static Test (ASTM C469) 140.00$ TestUnit Weight Including Lightweight Concrete 70.00$ TestLightweight Concrete Fill, Compression (C495) 30.00$ TestDrying Shrinkage Up to 28 Days: Three3x3or4x4Bars, Five Readings up to 28 Dry Days(ASTM C157)415.00$ TestAdditional Reading 50.00$ Set of 3 BarsStorage Over Ninety (90) Days 40.00$Set of 3 Bars/MonthSplitting Tensile Strength (C496) 60.00$ TestCoefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete (CRD 39, AASHTO T336) 880.00$ TestCompression Test (ASTM C495 and C472) 50.00$ TestAir Dry Density (ASTM C472) 40.00$ TestOven Dry Density (ASTM C495) 65.00$ TestSample Trimming in the lab, up6diameter 20.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitCompression (3 Required Per ASTM C90) 65.00$ EachAbsorption/Moisture Content/Oven Dry Density (3 Required per ASTM) 100.00$ EachLinear/Volumetric Shrinkage (ASTM C426) 110.00$ TestWeb and Face Shell Measurements 50.00$ TestTension Test 190.00$ TestCore Compression 60.00$ TestConformance Package (CTM 90) 65.00$ TestShear Test of Masonry Cores: 2 Faces 100.00$ TestEfflorescence Test (3 Required), each 60.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitAll trial batch for cement, concrete, grout, mortar, etc Quote Each Schedule of Fees for Laboratory ServicesConcrete Tests
Concrete Block, ASTM C140Laboratory Trial Batch: Cement, Concrete, Grout and MortarBrick Masonry Tests

City Council
14 –
53 7/21/2026

Item $/Unit UnitModulus of Rupture: Flexural (5 Required Per ASTM), each 60.00$ TestCompression Strength (3 Required Per ASTM), each 55.00$ TestAbsorption: 5 Hour or 24 Hour (5 Required), each 55.00$ TestAbsorption: 7 Day (CTM 67) 55.00$ TestAbsorption (Boil): 1, 2, or 5 Hours (5 Required), each 90.00$ TestInitial Rate of Absorption (5 Required), each 45.00$ TestMoisture as Received (CTM 67) 25.00$ TestSaturation Coefficitent (CTM 67) 65.00$ TestEfflorescence (5 Required), each 95.00$ TestCore: Compression, each 80.00$ TestShear Test on Brick Core: 2 Faces, each 100.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitCompression Test: Composite Masonry Prisms Up To8x16 220.00$ TestCompression Test: Composite Masonry Prisms Larger Than8x16 320.00$ TestMasonry: Cutting of Cubes or Prisms 80.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitCompression:2x4Mortar Cylinders 50.00$ TestCompression:3x3x6Grout Prisms, Includes Trimming 65.00$ TestCompression:2Cubes (ASTM C109) 65.00$ TestCompression: Cores (ASTM C42) 65.00$ TestMortar Expansion (ASTM C806) 330.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitOven Dry Density85.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitCore Compression Including Trimming (ASTM C42) 65.00$ TestCompression6x12Cylinders 40.00$ TestCompression: Cubes 45.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitAtterberg Limits/Plasticity Index (ASTM D4318)155.00$ TestCalifornia Bearing Ratio (ASTM D1883) 395.00$ TestChloride and Sulfate Content (CTM 417, CTM 422) 160.00$ TestConsolidation, Full Cycle (ASTM 2435, CTM 219) 305.00$ TestCleanness Value:1x #4 (CTM 227) 205.00$ TestCleanness Value:2.5x1.5or1.5x.75(CTM 227) 325.00$ TestCorrosivity Series: Sulfate, Cl, pH (CTM 643 and 417) 220.00$ TestLab Resistivity 140.00$ TestDirect Shear Test (ASTM D3080) 280.00$ TestDirect Shear Test, per point 120.00$ TestDirect Shear Test Sample Remolding (ASTM D3080) 50.00$ TestDurability Index Fine Aggregate 175.00$ TestExpansion Index (ASTM D4829, UBC 182) 170.00$ TestDurability Index: Coarse Aggregate 175.00$ TestMaximum Density: Methods A/B/C (ASTM D1557 or D698, CTM 216) 205.00$ Test Fireproofing TestsGunite and Shotcrete TestsSoils and Aggregate Tests Masonry PrismsMortar and Grout

City Council
14 –
54 7/21/2026

Maximum Density: Check Point abrasion (ASTM D1557) 85.00$ TestMaximum Density: AASHTO C (Modified) (AASHTO T180) 220.00$ TestMoisture Density Rock Correction 175.00$ TestMoisture Content (ASTM D2216, CTM 226) 25.00$ TestMoisture, Ash and Organic Matter of Peat/Organic Soils 105.00$ TestDensity: Ring Sample (ASTM D2937) 35.00$ TestDensity: Shelby Tube Sample (ASTM D2937) 60.00$ TestOrganic Impurities (ASTM C40) 105.00$ TestFailing Head Permeability (ASTM D2434) 275.00$ TestRValue: Soil (ASTM 2844) 390.00$ TestRValue: Aggregate Base (ASTM D2844) 390.00$ TestSand Equivalent (ASTM D2419, CTM 217) 145.00$ TestSoil Classification (ASTM D2487) 40.00$ TestSieve #200 Wash Only (ASTM D1140) 105.00$ TestSieve with Hydrometer: Sand to Clay (ASTM D422) 320.00$ TestSieve Analysis including Wash (ASTM C136) 190.00$ TestSieve Analysis Without Wash 130.00$ TestSpecific Gravity and Absorption: Coarse (ASTM C127, CTM 202) 105.00$ TestSpecific Gravity and Absorption: Fine(ASTM C128, CTM 207) 175.00$ TestSwell/Settlement Potential: One Dimensional (ASTM D4546) 180.00$ TestUnit Weight Coarse Aggregate 90.00$ TestUnit Weight Fine Aggregate 90.00$ TestVoids in Aggregate (ASTM C29) 100.00$ TestUnconfined Compression (ASTM D2166, CTM 221) 110.00$ TestLA Rattler 215.00$ TestpH of soil 25.00$ TestPocket Penetration Test 10.00$ TestInfiltration Rate of Soils in Field Using DoubleRing Infiltrometer (ASTM D3385) 2,310.00$ TestPermeability of Synthetic Turf Sports Field Base Stone and Surface System by NonConfinedArea Flood Test Method ASTM F28981,155.00$ TestShrinkage of Soil Mixture 305.00$ TestHydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous Materials by Flexible Wall (ASTM D5084) 250.00$ TestConsolidated Drained Triaxial Compression Test for Soils (ASTM D7181) 295.00$ TestConsolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils (ASTM D4767) 330.00$ TestUnconsolidatedUndrained Triaxial Compression Test on Cohesive Soils (ASTM D2850) 310.00$ TestTriaxial Shear, C.D., three points, (CTM 230) 295.00$ TestTriaxial Shear, C.U., three points (ASTM D4767, CTM 230) 330.00$ TestTriaxial Shear, U.U., one point (ASTM D2850, CTM 230) 310.00$ TestWax Density (ASTM D1188) 65.00$ TestClay Lumps and Friable Particles (CTM 142) 60.00$ TestCrushed Particles (CTM 205) 80.00$ TestMortar Making Properties of Fine Aggregate (CTM 87) 145.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitAsphalt Core Density 65.00$ TestExtraction % AC by Ignition Oven (CTM 382)/ Binder 195.00$ TestGradation on Extracted Asph (ASTM D6507 andD5444, CTM 202, and CTM 382) 110.00$ TestMoisture Content (CTM 370) 85.00$ TestMaximum Theoretical Specific Gravity (RICE) (ASTM D2041, CTM 309) 175.00$ TestSpecific Gravity and Absorption: Coarse (ASTM C127, CTM 206) 100.00$ TestSpecific Gravity and Absorption: Fine (ASTM C128, CTM 207) 175.00$ TestSieve Analysis (ASTM D5444 and C136) 105.00$ TestSieve Analysis with Wash (ASTM D5444) 155.00$ TestSand Equivalent (ASTM D2419) 150.00$ TestAsphalt Concrete Tests

City Council
14 –
55 7/21/2026

5 pt LTMD Bulk Specific Gravity (CTM 308, CTM 375) 315.00$ TestFlat and Elongated Particles (ASTM D4791) 230.00$ TestFine Aggregate Angularity (AASHTO T304 A) 215.00$ TestMaximum Density HVEEM (ASTM D1560) 230.00$ TestMaximum Density Marshall (ASTM D1559 and D561) 230.00$ TestMix Stability (CTM 304) 230.00$ TestWet track Abrasion Loss (ASTM D3910), each 195.00$ TestExtraction % of Emulsion (ASTM D6307) 170.00$ TestSlurry seal field consistency test (ASTM D3910) 95.00$ TestMaximum Theoretical Unit Weight (ASTM D2041) 170.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitBend Test: #11 or Smaller 70.00$ TestBend Test: Larger Than # 11 105.00$ TestTensile Test: # 11 or Smaller 95.00$ TestTensile Test: # 14 125.00$ TestTensile Test: # 18 315.00$ TestSlippage Test In Addition to Tensile Test (Per Caltrans 521.08C) 370.00$ TestTensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 11 and Smaller 135.00$ TestTensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 14 190.00$ TestTensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 18 370.00$ TestTensile Test: Welded # 11 and Smaller 95.00$ TestTensile Test: Welded # 14 135.00$ TestTensile Test: Welded # 18 315.00$ TestSample Straightening for Bend or Tensile Test (if required) 70.00$ TestTesting MultiWire Steel Prestressing Strand 370.00$ TestTensile Test: THead #11 and Smaller 170.00$ TestTensile Test: THead #14 220.00$ TestTensile Test: THead #18 315.00$ TestTensile Test: Welded Hoops # 11 and Smaller 135.00$ TestTensile Test: Welded Hoops # 14 190.00$ TestHigh Strength Bolt, Nut and Washer Conformance, set, A32 140.00$ TestStructural Steel Tensile Test up to 200,000 lbs. (machining extra), A370 45.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitHardness Test (Rockwell) and Brinnel (ASTM E18) 85.00$ TestHardness Test of Nuts 95.00$ TestHardness Test of Bolts 110.00$ TestHardness Test of Washers 95.00$ TestASTM F606 Bolt Axial, Wedge Tensile and Proof load 130.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitEquipment Concrete (4 and 8 hour minimum) 220.00$ HourIndividual Core Prices (all prices are for a four core minimum job):$Slab on Grade Coring for2,3and4Diameter (first6depth) each 80.00$ TestSlab on Grade Coring for6and8Diameter (first6depth) each 85.00$ TestSlab on Grade Concrete Core (price per inch after6depth) 10.00$ TestWall Cores2,3and4(first6in depth) each 95.00$ TestWall Concrete Core (price per inch after6in depth), per inch(Wall core pries based on Contractor supplying access to area to be cored)10.00$ InchMiscellaneous Concrete Coring Prices:$Metal TestingConcrete Coring Services Reinforcing Steel

City Council
14 –
56 7/21/2026

Patching Slab on Grade Cored Holes with 2500 psi Concrete Patch, each 20.00$ TestThickness Determination per ASTM C42, each 20.00$ TestCompression Strength Determination 70.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitAlternate Individual Core Prices (all prices are for a four core minimum job):Asphaltic Concrete Cores2,3and4Diameter (First6in depth), each 80.00$ TestAsphaltic Concrete Cores6and8Diameter (First6in depth), each 80.00$ TestAsphaltic Concrete Cores price per inch after6in depth, each 10.00$ TestMiscellaneous Asphaltic Coring Prices:Patching of Core Drilled Holes Using Cold Patch Material, each 35.00$ TestThickness Determination per ASTM C42, each 40.00$ TestSpecific Gravity for Determination of Percent Compaction per ASTM D 2726, each 50.00$ TestSpecific Gravity for Determination of Percent Compaction by Paraffin, each 70.00$ TestItem $/Unit UnitAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 6hour/rush Turnaround, each35.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 8hour Turnaround, each 25.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 24hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 48hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 72hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 5day Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 10day Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestPhase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 6hour Turnaround, each 30.00$ TestPhase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 24hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestPhase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 48hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestPhase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 3day Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestPhase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 5day Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestAsbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 68 hour Turnaround, each 210.00$ TestAsbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 24 hour Turnaround, each 150.00$ TestAsbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 48 hour Turnaround, each 135.00$ TestAsbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 3day Turnaround, each 120.00$ TestAsbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 5day Turnaround, each 115.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 4hour Turnaround, each 125.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 8hour Turnaround, each 120.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 24hour Turnaround, each 115.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 48hour Turnaround, each 105.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 72hour Turnaround, each 95.00$ TestAsbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 5day Turnaround, each 85.00$ TestAsbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, same day Turnaround, each 140.00$ TestAsbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, 24hour Turnaround, each 115.00$ TestAsbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, 72hour Turnaround, each 90.00$ TestAsbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, 5day Turnaround, each 85.00$ TestAsbestos TEM Microvac Dust Quantitative, 6hour Turnaround, each 360.00$ TestAsbestos TEM Microvac Dust Quantitative, 24hour Turnaround, each 265.00$ TestAsbestos TEM Microvac Dust Quantitative, 48hour Turnaround, each 240.00$ TestAsbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 24hour Turnaround, each 190.00$ TestAsbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 48hour Turnaround, each 180.00$ TestAsbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 3day Turnaround, each 150.00$ TestAsbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 5day Turnaround, each 135.00$ TestLead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4hour Turnaround, each 45.00$ TestLead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6hour/same day Turnaround, each 25.00$ TestLead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ Test Asphalt Concrete Coring ServicesEnvironmental Tests

City Council
14 –
57 7/21/2026

Lead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48hour Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestLead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3day Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestLead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4hour Turnaround, each 45.00$ TestLead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6hour/same day Turnaround, each 25.00$ TestLead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestLead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48hour Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestLead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3day Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestLead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4hour Turnaround, each 45.00$ TestLead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6hour/same day Turnaround, each 25.00$ TestLead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestLead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48hour Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestLead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3day Turnaround, each 15.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3hour Turnaround, each 50.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6hour Turnaround, each 35.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24hour Turnaround, each 30.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 32hour Turnaround, each 25.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48hour Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3day Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4day Turnaround, each 20.00$ TestLead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 5day Turnaround, each 20.00$ Test

City Council
14 –
58 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
59 7/21/2026

ON-CALL CONTRACT

City Council
14 –
60 7/21/2026

Date 5/21/2026CodeItem$/UnitUnitQuantityTotal Material and EquipmentE350 Brass Mold21.00$ Each-$ E351 Concrete Air Meter53.00$ Day-$ E352 Concrete Unit Weight (Scale, Bucket, Rod and Mallet)32.00$ Day-$ E354 Concrete/Asphalt Coring Equipment rental (min 4 hrs and 8 hrs after)200.00$ Hour-$ E355 Fireproofing Adhesion/Cohesion21.00$ Test-$ E356 Hand Auger Equipment131.00$ Day-$ E357 Level D Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), per person42.00$ Day-$ E358 Liquid Penetrating Consumables32.00$ Day-$ E359 Magnetic Particle Equipment and Consumables42.00$ Day-$ E360 Ultrasonic Equipment and Consumables68.00$ Day-$ E361 Nuclear Density Gauge Usage19.00$ Hour-$ E362 Compaction Test, per location21.00$ Test-$ E363 Portable Concrete Laboratory-not including Technicians-$ Quote/Day-$ E364 Pachometer (Rebar Locator)58.00$ Day-$ E365 Environmental PID Usage200.00$ Day-$ E366 Pull Test Equipment74.00$ Day-$ E367 Sand Cone Test Kit (Scale, Burner, Sand Cone Apparatus)179.00$ Day-$ E368 Schmidt Hammer53.00$ Day-$ E369 Torque Wrench, Small21.00$ Day-$ E370 Torque Wrench, Large37.00$ Day-$ E371 Torque Multiplier (Skidmore)95.00$ Day-$ E372 Miscellaneous Equipment Charge-$ Quote Each-$ E373 Vapor Emission Kit58.00$ Each-$ E374 Field Resistivity Meter240.00$ Day-$ E375 Water Level Meter80.00$ Day-$ E376 Environmental ph/Turbidity/Conductivity/Temp Meter110.00$ Day-$ E377 Environmental FID Usage110.00$ Day-$ E378 Environmental groundwater sampling pump215.00$ Day-$ E379 XRF Lead Analyzer131.00$ Hour-$ E380 Relative Humidity74.00$ Day-$ E381 GPR (Ground Penetrating Radar), for buried rebar in concrete90.00$ Hour-$ E382 Load Cell for tension - Maximum 2,000 lb55.00$ Hour-$ E383 Equipment for Double Ring Infiltrometer Testing per ASTM D3385750.00$ Day -$ E384Equipment for Standard Test Method for Permeability of Synthetic Turf Sports Field Based Stone and Surface System by Non-confined Area Flood Test Method. ASTM F2898250.00$ Day -$ E385Minor Traffic Control Equipment for residential/minor or secondary collector (signs and cones)1,700.00$ Day -$ E386 Barologger Solinst A/E 61160180.00$ Day-$ E387 Drone Site Monitoring & Mapping225.00$ Day-$ E388 Zefon High Volume Air Sampling Pump150.00$ Day-$ E389 Zefon Rotameter40.00$ Day-$ E390 PCM Air Cassettes15.00$ Each-$ E391 TEM Air Cassettes15.00$ Each-$ E392 Ghost Wipes for surface sampling, including lead and beryllium testing5.00$ Each-$ E393 TEM Cassette, 25mm, Microvac for collection of fibers and particulate 15.00$ Each-$ E394 Automatic Pull-off Adhesion Tester (ASTM C1583)350.00$ Day-$ E395 50mm Dolly's for ASTM C158365.00$ Each-$ Concrete TestingC40037.00$ Test-$ C40184.00$ Test-$ C402 Cylinders: Splitting Tensile Strength (ASTM C496)84.00$ Test-$ C403 Core Compression including Trimming (ASTM C39)53.00$ Test-$ C404 Coring of Test Panels in Lab26.00$ Each-$ C405 Diamond Sawing of Cores or Cylinders (ASTM C642)26.00$ Test-$ C406 Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete (ASTM C642)315.00$ Test-$ C407 Modulus of Elasticity Static Test (ASTM C469)131.00$ Test-$ C408 Unit Weight Including Lightweight Concrete68.00$ Test-$ ODC RatesCity of Santa Ana 26-059AAESCO Proposal No. P9452

City Council
14 –
61 7/21/2026

ODC RatesCity of Santa Ana 26-059AAESCO Proposal No. P9452C409Days (ASTM C157)394.00$ Test -$ C410 Additional Reading47.00$ Set of 3 Bars-$ C411 Storage Over Ninety (90) Days37.00$ Set of 3 Bars/Month-$ C435 Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of Concrete (CRD 39, AASHTO T336)840.00$ Test-$ C436 Compression Test (ASTM C495 and C472)47.00$ Test-$ C437 Air Dry Density (ASTM C472)37.00$ Test-$ C438 Oven Dry Density (ASTM C495)63.00$ Test-$ C43921.00$ Test-$ Masonry and Brick TestingC412 Compression (3 Required Per ASTM)63.00$ Each-$ C413 Absorption/Moisture Content/Oven Dry Density (3 Required per ASTM)95.00$ Each-$ C414 Linear/Volumetric Shrinkage (ASTM C426)105.00$ Test-$ C415 Web and Face Shell Measurements47.00$ Test-$ C416 Tension Test179.00$ Test-$ C417 Core Compression58.00$ Test-$ C418 Shear Test of Masonry Cores: 2 Faces95.00$ Test-$ C419 Efflorescence Test (3 Required), each58.00$ Test-$ M500 Modulus of Rupture: Flexural (5 Required Per ASTM), each58.00$ Test-$ M501 Compression Strength (3 Required Per ASTM), each53.00$ Test-$ M502 Absorption: 5 Hour or 24 Hour (5 Required), each53.00$ Test-$ M503 Absorption (Boil): 1, 2, or 5 Hours (5 Required), each84.00$ Test-$ M504 Initial Rate of Absorption (5 Required), each42.00$ Test-$

City Council
14 –
62 7/21/2026

ODC RatesCity of Santa Ana 26-059AAESCO Proposal No. P9452M505 Efflorescence (5 Required), each89.00$ TestM506 Core: Compression, each74.00$ Test-$ M507 Shear Test on Brick Core: 2 Faces, each95.00$ Test-$ M508210.00$ Test-$ M509305.00$ Test-$ M510 Masonry: Cutting of Cubes or Prisms74.00$ Test-$ MortarM51147.00$ Test-$ M51263.00$ Test-$ M51363.00$ Test-$ M514 Compression: Cores (ASTM C42)63.00$ Test-$ M515 Mortar Expansion (ASTM C806)315.00$ Test-$ -$ F550 Oven Dry Density 79.00$ Test-$ F551 Adhesion/Cohesions Testing, per hour, 4 hour minimum 126.00$ Test-$ CoreC420 Core Compression Including Trimming (ASTM C42) 63.00$ Test-$ C42137.00$ Test-$ C422 Compression: Cubes 42.00$ Test-$ SoilsS600 Atterberg Limits/Plasticity Index (ASTM D4318)147.00$ Test-$ S601 Chloride and Sulfate Content (CTM 417, CTM 422)152.00$ Test-$ S602 Consolidation, Full Cycle (ASTM 2435, CTM 219)289.00$ Test-$ S603194.00$ Test-$ S604310.00$ Test-$ S605 Corrosivity Series: Sulfate, Cl, pH (CTM 643 and 417)210.00$ Test-$ S606 Lab Resistivity 131.00$ Test-$ S607 Direct Shear Test (ASTM D3080)268.00$ Test-$ S608 Direct Shear Test, per point116.00$ Test-$ S609 Direct Shear Test Sample Remolding (ASTM D3080)47.00$ Test-$ S610 Durability Index Fine Aggregate168.00$ Test-$ S611 Expansion Index (ASTM D4829, UBC 18-2)163.00$ Test-$ S612 Durability Index: Coarse Aggregate168.00$ Test-$ S613 Maximum Density: Methods A/B/C (ASTM D1557 or D698, CTM 216)194.00$ Test-$ S614 Maximum Density: Check Point abrasion (ASTM D1557)79.00$ Test-$ S615 Maximum Density: AASHTO C (Modified) (AASHTO T-180)210.00$ Test-$ S616 Moisture Density Rock Correction168.00$ Test-$ S617 Moisture Content (ASTM D2216, CTM 226)26.00$ Test-$ S618 Density: Ring Sample (ASTM D2937)32.00$ Test-$ S619 Density: Shelby Tube Sample (ASTM D2937)58.00$ Test-$ S620 Organic Impurities (ASTM C40)100.00$ Test-$ S621 Failing Head Permeability (ASTM D2434)263.00$ Test-$ S622 R-Value: Soil (ASTM 2844)373.00$ Test-$ S623 R-Value: Aggregate Base (ASTM D2844)373.00$ Test-$ S624 Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419, CTM 217)137.00$ Test-$ S625 Soil Classification (ASTM D2487)37.00$ Test-$ S626 Sieve #200 Wash Only (ASTM D1140)100.00$ Test-$ S627 Sieve with Hydrometer: Sand to Clay (ASTM D422)305.00$ Test-$ S628 Sieve Analysis including Wash (ASTM C136)179.00$ Test-$ S629 Sieve Analysis Without Wash126.00$ Test-$ S630 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Coarse (ASTM C127, CTM 202)100.00$ Test-$ S631 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Fine(ASTM C128, CTM 207)168.00$ Test-$ S632 Swell/Settlement Potential: One Dimensional (ASTM D4546)173.00$ Test-$ S633 Unit Weight Coarse Aggregate84.00$ Test-$ S634 Unit Weight Fine Aggregate84.00$ Test-$ S635 Voids in Aggregate (ASTM C29)95.00$ Test-$ S636 Unconfined Compression (ASTM D2166, CTM 221)105.00$ Test-$ S637 LA Rattler205.00$ Test-$ S638 pH of soil26.00$ Test-$ S639 Pocket Penetration Test 11.00$ Test-$ S640 Infiltration Rate of Soils in Field Using Double-Ring Infiltrometer (ASTM D3385)2,200.00$ Test-$

City Council
14 –
63 7/21/2026

ODC RatesCity of Santa Ana 26-059AAESCO Proposal No. P9452S641Permeability of Synthetic Turf Sports Field Base Stone and Surface System by Non-Confined Area Flood Test Method ASTM F28981,100.00$ Test -$ S642Pocket vane shear ASTM D8121/8121M18.00$ Test-$ SoilsA650 Asphalt Core Density63.00$ Test-$ A651 Extraction % AC by Ignition Oven (CTM 382) 184.00$ Test-$ A652 Gradation on Extracted Asph (ASTM D6507 andD5444, CTM 202, and CTM 382)105.00$ Test-$ A653 Moisture Content (CTM 370)79.00$ Test-$ A654 Maximum Theoretical Specific Gravity (RICE) (ASTM D2041, CTM 309)168.00$ Test-$ A655 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Coarse (ASTM C127, CTM 206)95.00$ Test-$ A656 Specific Gravity and Absorption: Fine (ASTM C128, CTM 207)168.00$ Test-$ A657 Sieve Analysis (ASTM D5444 and C136)100.00$ Test-$ A658 Sieve Analysis with Wash (ASTM D5444)147.00$ Test-$ A659 Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419)142.00$ Test-$ A660 5 pt LTMD Bulk Specific Gravity (CTM 308, CTM 375)299.00$ Test-$ A661 Flat and Elongated Particles (ASTM D4791)221.00$ Test-$ A662 Fine Aggregate Angularity (AASHTO T304 A)205.00$ Test-$ A663 Maximum Density HVEEM (ASTM D1560)221.00$ Test-$ A664 Maximum Density Marshall (ASTM D1559 and D561)221.00$ Test-$ A665 Mix Stability (CTM 304)221.00$ Test-$ A668 Wet track Abrasion Loss (ASTM D3910), each184.00$ Test-$ A669 Extraction % of Emulsion (ASTM D6307) 163.00$ Test-$ A670 Slurry seal field consistency test (ASTM D3910)89.00$ Test-$ A671 Maximum Theoretical Unit Weight (ASTM D2041)160.00$ Test-$ RebarsR700 Bend Test: #11 or Smaller68.00$ Test-$ R701 Bend Test: Larger Than # 11 100.00$ Test-$ R702 Tensile Test: # 11 or Smaller89.00$ Test-$ R703 Tensile Test: # 14121.00$ Test-$ R704 Tensile Test: # 18300.00$ Test-$ R705 Slippage Test In Addition to Tensile Test (Per Caltrans 52-1.08C)350.00$ Test-$ R706 Tensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 11 and Smaller130.00$ Test-$ R707 Tensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 14180.00$ Test-$ R708 Tensile Test: Mechanical Splice # 18350.00$ Test-$ R709 Tensile Test: Welded # 11 and Smaller90.00$ Test-$ R710 Tensile Test: Welded # 14130.00$ Test-$ R711 Tensile Test: Welded # 18 300.00$ Test-$ R712 Sample Straightening for Bend or Tensile Test (if required)65.00$ Test-$ R713 Testing Multi-Wire Steel Prestressing Strand350.00$ Test-$ R714 Tensile Test: T-Head #11 and Smaller 160.00$ Test-$ R715 Tensile Test: T-Head #14 210.00$ Test-$ R716 Tensile Test: T-Head #18 300.00$ Test-$ R717 Tensile Test: Welded Hoops # 11 and Smaller130.00$ Test-$ R718 Tensile Test: Welded Hoops # 14180.00$ Test-$ Bolts and NutsR719High Strength Bolt, Nut and Washer Conformance, set, A-32135.00$ Test-$ R720Structural Steel Tensile Test up to 200,000 lbs. (machining extra), A37045.00$ Test-$ SteelR714 Hardness Test (Rockwell) and Brinnel (ASTM E18)79.00$ TestR715 Hardness Test of Nuts89.00$ Test-$ R716 Hardness Test of Bolts105.00$ Test-$ R717 Hardness Test of Washers89.00$ Test-$ R718 ASTM F606 Bolt Axial, Wedge Tensile and Proof load125.00$ Test-$ Concrete and Asphalt CoringC423 Equipment Concrete (4 and 8 hour minimum)210.00$ Hour-$ Individual Core Prices (all prices are for a four core minimum job): -$ C42474.00$ Test-$ C42579.00$ Test-$ C42611.00$ Test-$ C42789.00$ Test-$ C428 (Wall core pries based on Contractor supplying access to area to be cored)11.00$ Inch -$

City Council
14 –
64 7/21/2026

ODC RatesCity of Santa Ana 26-059AAESCO Proposal No. P9452Miscellaneous Concrete Coring Prices:-$ C429 Patching Slab on Grade Cored Holes with 2500 psi Concrete Patch, each21.00$ Test-$ C430 Thickness Determination per ASTM C42, each21.00$ Test-$ Alternate Individual Core Prices (all prices are for a four core minimum job): A66174.00$ Test-$ A66274.00$ Test-$ A66311.00$ Test-$ Miscellaneous Asphaltic Coring Prices:A664 Patching of Core Drilled Holes Using Cold Patch Material, each32.00$ Test-$ A665 Thickness Determination per ASTM C42, each37.00$ Test-$ A666 Specific Gravity for Determination of Percent Compaction per ASTM D 2726, each47.00$ Test-$ A667 Specific Gravity for Determination of Percent Compaction by Paraffin, each68.00$ Test-$ Environmental TestingN800 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 6-hour/rush Turnaround, each35.00$ Test-$ N801 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 8-hour Turnaround, each23.00$ Test-$ N802 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 24-hour Turnaround, each21.00$ Test-$ N803 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 48-hour Turnaround, each18.00$ Test-$ N804 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 72-hour Turnaround, each17.00$ Test-$ N805 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 5-day Turnaround, each14.00$ Test-$ N806 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 10-day Turnaround, each12.00$ Test-$ N807 Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 6-hour Turnaround, each28.00$ Test-$ N808 Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 24-hour Turnaround, each21.00$ Test-$ N809 Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 48-hour Turnaround, each18.00$ Test-$ N810 Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 3-day Turnaround, each14.00$ Test-$ N811 Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) 5-day Turnaround, each12.00$ Test-$ N812 Asbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 6-8 hour Turnaround, each202.00$ Test-$ N813 Asbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 24 hour Turnaround, each144.00$ Test-$ N814 Asbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 48 hour Turnaround, each127.00$ Test-$ N815 Asbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 3-day Turnaround, each115.00$ Test-$ N816 Asbestos Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) AHERA, 5-day Turnaround, each110.00$ Test-$ N817 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 4-hour Turnaround, each120.00$ Test-$ N818 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 8-hour Turnaround, each115.00$ Test-$ N819 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 24-hour Turnaround, each110.00$ Test-$ N820 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 48-hour Turnaround, each98.00$ Test-$ N821 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 72-hour Turnaround, each92.00$ Test-$ N822 Asbestos Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) 1000 Point Count, 5-day Turnaround, each81.00$ Test-$ N823 Asbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, same day Turnaround, each133.00$ Test-$ N824 Asbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, 24-hour Turnaround, each111.00$ Test-$ N825 Asbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, 72-hour Turnaround, each87.00$ Test-$ N826 Asbestos TEM NIOSH 7402, 5-day Turnaround, each81.00$ Test-$ N827 Asbestos TEM Microvac Dust Quantitative, 6-hour Turnaround, each345.00$ Test-$ N828 Asbestos TEM Microvac Dust Quantitative, 24-hour Turnaround, each250.00$ Test-$ N829 Asbestos TEM Microvac Dust Quantitative, 48-hour Turnaround, each230.00$ Test-$ N830 Asbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 24-hour Turnaround, each180.00$ Test-$ N831 Asbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 48-hour Turnaround, each173.00$ Test-$ N832 Asbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 3-day Turnaround, each144.00$ Test-$ N833 Asbestos TEM Microvac Dust Qualitative, 5-day Turnaround, each127.00$ Test-$ N834 Lead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4-hour Turnaround, each41.00$ Test-$ N835 Lead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6-hour/same day Turnaround, each23.00$ Test-$ N836 Lead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24-hour Turnaround, each18.00$ Test-$ N837 Lead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48-hour Turnaround, each15.00$ Test-$ N838 Lead Wipe Dust (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3-day Turnaround, each12.00$ Test-$ N839 Lead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4-hour Turnaround, each41.00$ Test-$ N840 Lead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6-hour/same day Turnaround, each23.00$ Test-$ N841 Lead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24-hour Turnaround, each18.00$ Test-$ N842 Lead Air Sample (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48-hour Turnaround, each15.00$ Test-$ N843 Lead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3-day Turnaround, each12.00$ Test-$ N844 Lead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4-hour Turnaround, each41.00$ Test-$ N845 Lead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6-hour/same day Turnaround, each23.00$ Test-$ N846 Lead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24-hour Turnaround, each18.00$ Test-$ N847 Lead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48-hour Turnaround, each15.00$ Test-$ N848 Lead Paint Chip (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3-day Turnaround, each12.00$ Test-$

City Council
14 –
65 7/21/2026

ODC RatesCity of Santa Ana 26-059AAESCO Proposal No. P9452N849 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3-hour Turnaround, each46.00$ Test-$ N850 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 6-hour Turnaround, each35.00$ Test-$ N851 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 24-hour Turnaround, each27.00$ Test-$ N852 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 32-hour Turnaround, each22.00$ Test-$ N853 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 48-hour Turnaround, each20.00$ Test-$ N854 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 3-day Turnaround, each19.00$ Test-$ N855 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 4-day Turnaround, each18.00$ Test-$ N856 Lead Soil (Flame Atomic Absorption), 5-day Turnaround, each17.50$ Test-$

City Council
14 –
66 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT D

City Council
14 –
67 7/21/2026

Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the agreement, and for 5 years thereafter, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by Consultant, its agents, representatives, employees, and sub-contractors. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE Coverage shall be at least as broad as: Commercial General Liability (CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an “occurrence” basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $3,000,000 per occurrence and $6,000,000 aggregate. Automobile Liability (AL): Insurance Services Office Form CA 00 01 covering Code 1 (any auto), with combined single limit no less than $1,000,000. Workers’ Compensation (WC): as required by the State of California, with statutory limits, and Employer’s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $1,000,000 per accident, per employee, per policy for bodily injury or disease. Consultant attests that its workers’ compensation coverage extends to all persons who will be working wit the City under the agreed scope of services. Professional liability (Errors & Omissions (PL): with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim, and $2,000,000 aggregate. These requirements shall not in any way act to reduce coverage that is broader or includes higher limits than the minimums shown above. If Consultant maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimums shown above, City shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits maintained by Consultant. Insurance provided under this contract shall not contain any restrictions or limitations which are inconsistent with City’s rights under this contract. Other Insurance Provisions The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1. City of Santa Ana, its City Council, officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds on Consultant’s CGL and AL policies with respect to liability arising out of work operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant including materials, parts, equipment, and personnel furnished in connection with such work or operations and automobiles owned, leased, hired, or borrowed by or on behalf of Consultant. Additional insured status can be provided in the form of an endorsement to Consultant’s insurance. 2. For any claims related to this contract, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage as respects City of Santa Ana, its City Council, officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its City Council, officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall not contribute with it. 3. A severability of interest provision must apply for all the additional insureds, ensuring that Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the insurer’s limits of liability. 4. Consultant hereby grants City a waiver of subrogation which any insurer of said Consultant may acquire against City, its City Council, officers, officials, employees,

City Council
14 –
68 7/21/2026

agents, and volunteers by virtue of the payment of any loss under Consultant’s CGL, AL, WC, and PL policies. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement(s) that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation, but this provision applies regardless of whether City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from any insurer(s).. 5. Each insurance policy required herein shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, suspended, voided, reduced in coverage or in limits, non-renewed by the carrier, or materially changed except after thirty (30) days prior written notice has been given to City and ten (10) days prior written notice shall be provided to City for policy cancellation or non-renewal due to non-payment. 6. Certificate Holder on each Evidence of Insurance certificate shall be: City of Santa Ana, Attention: Ricardo Perez, 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-36, Santa Ana, CA 92701. The name and location of the event should be included in the Description of Operations section of each certificate. Claims Made Policies If any of the required policies provide coverage on a claims-made basis: 1. The retroactive date must be shown and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of work. 2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of work. 3. If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, Consultant must purchase “extended reporting” coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of work. 4. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to City. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state of California with a current A.M. Best rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to City. Self-Insured Retentions Self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. City may require Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. Waiver of Subrogation Consultant hereby agrees to waive rights of subrogation which any insurer of Consultant may acquire from Consultant by virtue of the payment of any loss. Consultant agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation. The Workers’ Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of City for all work performed by Consultant, its employees, agents, and sub-contractors. Verification of Coverage Consultant shall furnish City with original Certificates of Insurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to Entity before work begins. However, failure to obtain the required documents prior to the work beginning shall not waive Consultant’s obligation to

City Council
14 –
69 7/21/2026

provide them. City reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time. Subcontractors Consultant shall require and verify that all sub-contractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Consultant shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from sub-contractors. For CGL coverage, sub-contractors shall provide coverage with a form at least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13. Failure to Maintain Insurance Coverage If Consultant for any reason fails to maintain insurance coverage which is required pursuant to this contract, the same shall be deemed a material breach of contract. City may, at its sole option, terminate this contract at any time and obtain damages from Consultant resulting from said breach. Special Risks or Circumstances City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.

City Council
14 –
70 7/21/2026

AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ON-CALL MATERIAL TESTING AND SPECIAL

INSPECTION SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 21st day of July, 2026 by and between Kleinfelder, Inc. (“Consultant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City.

Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 26-059A.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

City Council
14 –
71 7/21/2026

set forth in this Agreement. In addition, Consultant will be reimbursed for incurred (actual) direct costs other than salary costs that are in the fee and cost proposal and identified in the fee and cost proposal, and in the executed Task Order. c. Specific projects will be assigned to Consultant through issuance of Task Orders. After a project to be performed under this Agreement is identified by City, City will prepare a draft Task Order less the cost estimate. A draft Task Order will identify the scope of services, expected results, project deliverables, period of performance, project schedule and will designate a City Project Coordinator. The draft Task Order will be delivered to Consultant for review. Consultant shall return the draft Task Order within ten (10) calendar days along with a Cost Estimate, including a written estimate of the number of hours and hourly rates per staff person, any anticipated reimbursable expenses, overhead, fee if any, and total dollar amount. After agreement has been reached on the negotiable items and total cost, the finalized Task Order shall be signed by both City and Consultant. d. Task Orders may be negotiated for a lump sum (Firm Fixed Price) or for specific rates of compensation, both of which must be based on the labor and other rates set forth in Consultant’s Cost Proposal. e. Reimbursement for transportation and subsistence costs shall not exceed the rates as specified in the approved Cost Proposal. f. When milestone cost estimates are included in the approved Cost Proposal, Consultant shall obtain prior written approval for a revised milestone cost estimate from Citybefore exceeding such estimate. g. Progress payments for each Task Order will be made monthly in arrears based on services provided and actual costs incurred. h. Consultant shall not commence performance of work or services until this Agreement has been approved by City, and notification to proceed has been issued by City. No payment will be made prior to approval or for any work performed prior to approval of this Agreement. i. A Task Order is of no force or effect until returned to City and signed by an authorized representative of City. No expenditures are authorized on a project, and work shall not commence until a Task Order for that project has been executed by City. j. Consultant will be reimbursed, as promptly as fiscal procedures will permit upon receipt by City of itemized invoices in triplicate. Separate invoices itemizing all costs are required for all work performed under each Task Order. Invoices shall be submitted no later than 45 calendar days after the performance of work for which Consultant is billing, or upon completion of the Task Order. Invoices shall detail the work performed on each milestone, on each project as applicable. Invoices shall follow the format stipulated for the approved Cost Proposal and shall reference this Agreement number,

City Council
14 –
72 7/21/2026

project title, and Task Order number. Credits due to City that include any equipment purchased under the Equipment Purchase provision of this Agreement must be reimbursed by Consultant prior to the expiration or termination of this Agreement. Invoices shall be mailed to City at the following address: City of Santa Ana, Public Works Agency M-36, 20 Civic Center Plaza, P.O. Box 1988, Santa Ana, CA 92702. k. The period of performance for Task Orders shall be in accordance with dates specified in the Task Order. No Task Order will be written which extends beyond the expiration date of this Agreement. l. The total amount payable by City for an individual Task Order shall not exceed the amount agreed to in the Task Order, unless authorized by contract amendment. m. If the Consultant fails to satisfactorily complete a deliverable according to the schedule set forth in a Task Order, no payment will be made until the deliverable has been satisfactorily completed. n. Task Orders may not be used to amend this Agreement and may not exceed the scope of work under this Agreement. o. p. The total amount payable by City for all Task Orders resulting from this Agreement shall not exceed the aggregate amount discussed above. It is understood and agreed that there is no guarantee, either expressed or implied, that this dollar amount will be authorized under this Agreement through Task Orders. q. Consultant shall submit progress reports on each specific project in accordance with the Task Order. These reports shall be submitted at least once a month. The report should be sufficiently detailed for the City’s Project Manager to determine, if Consultant is performing to expectations, or is on schedule; to provide communication of interim findings, and to sufficiently address any difficulties or special problems encountered, so remedies can be developed. r. Consultant’s Project Manager shall meet with City’s Project Manager, as needed, to discuss progress on the project(s). s. This Agreement is valid and enforceable only if sufficient funds are made available to the City for the purpose of this Agreement. In addition, this Agreement is subject to any additional restrictions, limitations, conditions, or any statute enacted by Congress, the State Legislature, or the City that may affect the provisions, terms or funding of this Agreement in any manner 3. COST PRINCIPLES AND ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS a. Consultant agrees that the Contract Cost Principles and Procedures, 48 CFR Part 31, Contract Cost Principals and Procedures, shall be used to determine the allowability of individual terms of cost. et seq., shall be used to determine the cost allowability of

City Council
14 –
73 7/21/2026

individual items. b. Consultant agrees to comply with federal procedures in accordance with 2 CFR, Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. c. Any costs for which payment has been made to Consultant that are determined by subsequent audit to be unallowable under 2 CFR, Part 200 and 48 CFR, Federal Acquisition Regulations System, Chapter 1, Part 31.000 et seq., are subject to repayment by Consultant to City. 4. PERFORMANCE PERIODa. This Agreement shall go into effect on July 21, 2026, contingent upon approval by City, and Consultant shall commence work after notification to proceed by City. This Agreement shall end on July 20, 2027, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 21, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for up to four (4), 1-year periods upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney. b. Consultant is advised that any recommendation for contract award is not binding on City until the Agreement is fully executed and approved by City. c. The period of performance for each specific project shall be in accordance with the Task Order for that project. If work on a Task Order is in progress on the expiration date of this Agreement, the terms of the Agreement shall be extended by amendment. 5. STATE PREVAILING WAGE RATES a. If applicable, Consultant shall comply with the State of California’s General Prevailing Wage Rate requirements in accordance with California Labor Code, Section 1770, and all Federal, State, and local laws and ordinances applicable to the work. b. Any subcontract entered into as a result of this Agreement, if for more than $25,000 for public works construction or more than $15,000 for the alteration, demolition, repair, or maintenance of public works, shall contain all of the provisions of this Section, unless the awarding agency has an approved labor compliance program by the Director of Industrial Relations. c. When prevailing wages apply to the services described in the scope of work, transportation and subsistence costs shall be reimbursed at the minimum rates set by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) as outlined in the applicable Prevailing Wage Determination. See http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall be responsible for any future adjustments to prevailing wage rates including, but not limited to, base hourly rates and employer payments as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations, Consultant is responsible for paying the appropriate rate, including escalations that take place during the term of the Agreement.

City Council
14 –
74 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
75 7/21/2026

relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Consultantfurther agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense of the City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Consultant’s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782.8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782.8, to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant. 10. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION Consultant shall defend and indemnify the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States’ letters patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in the work product or documents provided by Consultant to the City pursuant to this Agreement. 11. RETENTION OF RECORDS/ AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES a. For the purpose of determining compliance with Public Contract Code 10115, et seq. and Title 21, California Code of Regulations, Chapter 21, Section 2500 et seq., when applicable, and other matters connected with the performance of this Agreement, pursuant to Government Code 8546.7, Consultant, subconsultants, and City shall maintain and make available for inspection all books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to the performance of the Agreement, including but not limited to,the costs of administering the Agreement. All parties shall make such materials availableat their respective offices at all reasonable times during the Agreement period and for threeyears from the date of final payment under the Agreement. The state, State Auditor, City,FHWA, or any duly authorized representative of the Federal Government shall have accessto any books, records, and documents of Consultant and its certified public accountants work papers that are pertinent to the contract and indirect cost rates (ICR) for audit, examinations, workpaper review, excerpts, and transactions, and copies thereof shall be furnished if requested. b. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this Agreement that is not disposed of by mutual agreement shall be reviewed by the City. c. Not later than 30 days after issuance of the final audit report, Consultant may request a review by the City of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing, submitted to the project manager of RFP. d. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by City will excuse Consultant from

City Council
14 –
76 7/21/2026

full and timely performance in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. 12. CONFIDENTIALITYIf Consultant receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/or proprietary, Consultant agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance of this Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. “Confidential Information” shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non-use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that (a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; (b) is, through no fault of the Consultant disclosed in a publicly available source; (c) is in rightful possession of the Consultantwithout an obligation of confidentiality; (d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or (e) is independently developed by the Consultant without reference to information disclosed by the City. 13. CERTIFICATIONS The funds used to pay for this Agreement will be partly comprised of federal grant funds. Consultant agrees and understands that it will comply with the terms of the Certifications included below in Section 21, as well as all additional certifications included in RFP No. 26-059A, incorporated by reference into this Agreement. Consultant shall keep itself informed of all City, State and Federal laws and regulations which may, in any manner, affect the performance of it services pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall at all times, observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. City and its officers and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity by reason of the failure of the Consultant to comply with this paragraph. 14. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE a. The recipient or subrecipient must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, award, and administration of contracts. No employee, officer, agent, or board member with a real or apparent conflict of interest may participate in the selection, award, or administration of a contract supported by the Federal award. A conflict of interest includes when the employee, officer, agent, or board member, any member of their immediate family, their partner, or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the parties indicated herein, has a financial or other interest in or a tangible personal benefit from an entity considered for a contract. An employee, officer, agent, and board member of the recipient or subrecipient may neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value from contractors. However, the recipient or subrecipient may set standards for situations where the financial interest is not substantial or a gift is an unsolicited item of nominal value. The recipient's or subrecipient's standards of conduct must also provide for disciplinary actions to be

City Council
14 –
77 7/21/2026

applied for violations by its employees, officers, agents, or board members. b. If the recipient or subrecipient has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a State, local government, or Indian Tribe, the recipient or subrecipient must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest. Organizational conflicts of interest mean that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the recipient or subrecipient is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization. c. Consultant covenants that it presently has no interests and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement. d. No immediate family members of either the Mayor, City Council Member, or any appointed City Official, including appointed board and commission members, as defined under the City’s Municipal Code, whose position with the City shall award or influence the award of this Agreement, or any competing contract or amendment thereof, shall be employed in any capacity by the Consultant or have any other direct or indirect financial benefit or interest in this Agreement.e. The section also prohibits the awarding of any agreement, contract, grant, or any amendment to those awards, to any former full-time employee for one-year from date of employee separation except for any CalPERS retiree as authorized by City Council resolutionf. The Consultant must comply with all conflict of interest laws, ordinances, and regulations now in effect or hereafter to be enacted during the term of this Agreement. The Consultant warrants that it is not now aware of any facts which conflict with the prohibitions defined above. If the Consultant hereafter becomes aware of any facts that might reasonably be expected to create a conflict of interest, it must immediately make full written disclosure of such facts to the City. Full written disclosure must include, but is not limited to, identification of all persons implicated and a complete description of all relevant circumstances. Failure to comply with the provisions of this paragraph will be a material breach of this Agreement. g. Consultant covenants that none of its directors, officers, employees, or agents shallparticipate in selecting or administrating any subcontract supported (in whole or in part) by City funds stemming from the Agreement where the awarding of the subcontract has any direct or indirect financial benefit or interest to any individual, as defined in subsections (d) and (e) above. 15. REBATES, KICKBACKS, OR OTHER UNLAWFUL CONSIDERATION Consultant warrants that this Agreement was not obtained or secured through rebates

City Council
14 –
78 7/21/2026

kickbacks or other unlawful consideration, either promised or paid to any City employee. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right in its discretion; to terminate the contract without liability; to pay only for the value of the work actually performed; or to deduct from the contract price; or otherwise recover the full amount of such rebate, kickback or other unlawful consideration. 16. NON-DISCRIMINATION Consultant shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, gender, medical conditions, genetic information, or military and veteran status, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, teaching, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or any services provided under this Agreement. Consultant affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 17. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE a. Prior authorization in writing by City shall be required before Consultant enters into any unbudgeted purchase order, or subcontract exceeding $5,000 for supplies, equipment, or consultant services. Consultant shall provide an evaluation of the necessity or desirability of incurring such costs. b. For purchase of any item, service or consulting work not covered in Consultant’s Cost Proposal and exceeding $5,000 prior authorization by City, three competitive quotations must be submitted with the request, or the absence of bidding must be adequately justified. c. Any equipment purchased as a result of this Agreement is subject to the following condition: “Consultant shall maintain an inventory of all nonexpendable property. Nonexpendable property is defined as having a useful life of at least two years and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more. If the purchased equipment needs replacement and is sold or traded in, City shall receive a proper refund or credit at the conclusion of the Agreement, or if the Agreement is terminated, Consultant may either keep the equipment and credit City in an amount equal to its fair market value, or sell such equipment at the best price obtainable at a public or private sale, in accordance with established City procedures and credit City in an amount equal to the sales price. If Consultant elects to keep the equipment, fair market value shall be determined at Consultant’s expense, based on a competent independent appraisal of such equipment. Appraisals shall be obtained from an appraiser mutually agreeable to by City and Consultant. If it is determined to sell the equipment, the terms and conditions of such sale must be approved in advance by City.” 2 CFR, Part 200 requires a credit to Federal funds when participating equipment with a fair market value greater than $5,000 is credited to the project. 18. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and

City Council
14 –
79 7/21/2026

Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 19. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City. 20. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultant compensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant to deliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement. 21. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 22. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be

City Council
14 –
80 7/21/2026

determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement. 23. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Consultant shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement. 24. FEDERAL REGULATIONSConsultant shall comply with all applicable contractual provisions required by the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as set for the in 2 CRF Part 200, whether or not expressly set forth in this document, including but not limited to those provisions set forth below. Notwithstanding, anything to the contrary herein, including without limitation, the language in this Agreement, the actual language contained in federal statutes, federal regulations, federally promulgated materials and state statutes, shall control in determining any obligations under federal law in the event of a conflict with any terms, language or provisions contained in this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform any act, fail to perform any act, or refuse to comply with any requests, which would cause City to be in violation of the federal terms and conditions. a. Federal Regulations – Recipient must comply with the government cost principles, uniform administrative requirements and audit requirements for federal grant program housed within Title 2, Part 180 of the Code of Federal Regulations. b. Debarment and Suspension – As required by Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 CFR §200.214 and codified in 2 CFR Part 200, Recipient must provide protection against waste, fraud, and abuse by debarring or suspending those persons deemed irresponsible in their dealings with the Federal government. c. Audit Records – With respect to all matters covered by this agreement all records shall be made available for audit and inspection by CITY, the grant agency and/or their duly authorized representatives for a period of three (3) years from the date of submission of the final expenditure report by the City of Santa Ana. For a period of three years after final delivery hereunder or until all claims related to this Agreement are finally settled, whichever is later, Recipient shall preserve and maintain all documents, papers and records relevant to the services provided in accordance with this Agreement, including the Attachments hereto. For the same time period, Recipient shall make said documents, papers and records available to City and the agency from which City received grant funds or their duly authorized representative(s), for examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises of Recipient, upon request during usual working hours.

City Council
14 –
81 7/21/2026

d. Reports – Recipient shall provide to City all records and information requested by City for inclusion in quarterly reports and such other reports or records as City may be required to provide to the agency from which City received grant funds or other persons or agencies. e. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Handicapped) – All recipients of federal funds must comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (The Act). Therefore, the federal funds recipient pursuant to the requirements of The Act hereby gives assurance that no otherwise qualified handicapped person shall, solely by reason of handicap be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of or be subject to discrimination, including discrimination in employment, in any program or activity that receives or benefits from federal financial assistance. The Recipient agrees it will ensure that requirements of The Act shall be included in the agreements with and be binding on all of its contractors, subcontractors, assignees or successors.f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 – (ADA) Recipient must comply with all requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as applicable.g. Political Activity – None of the funds, materials, property, or services provided directly or indirectly under this agreement shall be used for any partisan political activity, or to further the election or defeat of any candidate for public office, or otherwise in violation of the provisions of the "Hatch Act". h. No Lobbying – Recipient will comply with all applicable lobbying prohibitions and laws, including those found in the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352, et seq.), and agrees that none of the funds provided under this award may be expended by the Recipient to pay any person to influence, or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any federal action concerning the award or renewal of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. i. Non-Discrimination and Equal Opportunity – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1964, as amended; Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990); Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended; Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972, as amended; Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970, as amended; Section 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912, as amended; Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regulations, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G; and Department of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and 39. In the event a Federal or State court, Federal or State administrative agency, or the Recipient makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the Recipient will forward a copy of the findings to CITY which will, in turn, submit the findings to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. If applicable, recipient will comply with the equal opportunity clause in 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended

City Council
14 –
82 7/21/2026

by Executive Order No. 11375. j. Equal Employment Opportunity – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, entitled “Equal Employment Opportunity,” as amended by Executive Order 11375 of October 13, 1967, and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR chapter 60), as applicable.k. Public Contracts Code – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the California Public Contract Code Section 10295.3, as applicable.l. Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 3145) as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 3), as applicable. m. David-Bacon Act – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141-3144 and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. n. Work Hours and Safety – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Sections 103 and 107 of the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5), as applicable. o. Clean Air Act – 1. The contractor agrees to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. 2. The contractor agrees to report each violation to CITY and understands and agrees that the CITY will, in turn, report each violation as required to assure notification to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the appropriate Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office. 3. The contractor agrees to include these requirements in each subcontract exceeding $150,000 financed in whole or in part with Federal assistance provided by FEMA. p. Energy and Conservation – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6201), as applicable. q. Waste Disposal – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as applicable. r. Patent Rights – Recipient agrees that the Department of Homeland Security shall have the

City Council
14 –
83 7/21/2026

authority to seek patent rights for any process, product, invention or discovery developed and paid for with funding through this Agreement based on the requirements of 37 CFR§ 401 and any other implementing regulations, as applicable. s. Copyright – Recipient may copyright any books, publications or other copyrightable materials developed in the course of or under this Agreement. However, the federal awarding agency, State Administrative Agency (SAA) and City reserve a royalty-free, non-exclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for federal government, SAA and/or City purpose: (1) the copyright in any work developed through this Agreement; and (2) any rights of copyright to which the subcontractor purchases ownership with support through this grant. The Federal government’s, SAA’s and City’s rights identified above must be conveyed to the publisher and the language of the publisher’s release form must ensure the preservation of these rights. t. Equal Employment in Construction Contracts – Pursuant to Equal Employment Opportunity requirements of 41 C.F.R. 60-1.4(b) in accordance with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order No. 11375, as to any construction contract thereunder, if applicable, during the performance of this contract, the contractor agrees as follows: (1) The contractor will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. The contractor will take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The contractor agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices to be provided setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. (2) The contractor will, in all solicitations or advertisements for employees placed by or on behalf of the contractor, state that all qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or national origin. (3) The contractor will not discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because such employee or applicant has inquired about, discussed, or disclosed the compensation of the employee or applicant or another employee or applicant. This provision shall not apply to instances in which an employee who has access to the compensation information of other employees or applicants as a part of such employee's essential job functions

City Council
14 –
84 7/21/2026

discloses the compensation of such other employees or applicants to individuals who do not otherwise have access to such information, unless such disclosure is in response to a formal complaint or charge, in furtherance of an investigation, proceeding, hearing, or action, including an investigation conducted by the employer, or is consistent with the contractor's legal duty to furnish information. (4) The contractor will send to each labor union or representative of workers with which he has a collective bargaining agreement or other contract or understanding, a notice to be provided advising the said labor union or workers' representatives of the contractor's commitments under this section, and shall post copies of the notice in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment. (5) The contractor will comply with all provisions of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and of the rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor. (6) The contractor will furnish all information and reports required by Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and by rules, regulations, and orders of the Secretary of Labor, or pursuant thereto, and will permit access to his books, records, and accounts by the administering agency and the Secretary of Labor for purposes of investigation to ascertain compliance with such rules, regulations, and orders. (7) In the event of the contractor's noncompliance with the nondiscrimination clauses of this contract or with any of the said rules, regulations, or orders, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part and the contractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts or federally assisted construction contracts in accordance with procedures authorized in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and such other sanctions may be imposed and remedies invoked as provided in Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, or by rule, regulation, or order of the Secretary of Labor, or as otherwise provided by law. (8) The contractor will include the portion of the sentence immediately preceding paragraph (1) and the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (8) in every subcontract or purchase order unless exempted by rules, regulations, or orders of the Secretary of Labor issued pursuant to section 204 of Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, so that such provisions will be binding upon each subcontractor or vendor. The contractor will take such action with respect to any subcontract or purchase order as the administering agency may direct as a means of enforcing such provisions, including sanctions for noncompliance. u. Prohibition on Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.216. Recipient will comply with FEMA Policy 405-143-1, Prohibitions on Expending FEMA Award Funds on Covered Telecommunications Equipment or Services (Interim), which prohibits grant recipients and

City Council
14 –
85 7/21/2026

subrecipients from obligating or expending loan or grant funds to procure or obtain, extend or renew a contract to procure or obtain, or to enter into a contract (or extend or renew a contract) to procure or obtain equipment, services, or systems that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system.As described in Public Law 115-232, section 889, covered telecommunications equipment: (1) Telecommunications equipment produced by Huawei Technologies Company or ZTE Corporation (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (2) For the purpose of public safety, security of government facilities, physical security surveillance of critical infrastructure, and other national security purposes, video surveillance and telecommunications equipment produced by Hytera Communications Corporation, Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Company, or Dahua Technology Company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of such entities). (3) Telecommunications or video surveillance services produced by such entities or using such equipment. (4) Telecommunications or video surveillance equipment or services produced or provided by an entity that the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Director of the National Intelligence or the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, reasonably believes to be an entity owned or controlled by, or otherwise connected to, the government of a covered foreign country. v. Domestic Preferences for Procurements/Subcontracts – Recipient will comply, and all its contractors (or subrecipients) will comply, with all requirements under Uniform Guidance 2 CFR §200.322. Recipient shall comply with the federal and recipient standards in the award of any subcontracts. For purposes of this Agreement, subcontracts shall include but not be limited to purchase agreements, rental or lease agreements, third party agreements, consultant service contracts and construction subcontracts. Recipient shall ensure that the terms of this Agreement with the CITY are incorporated into all Subcontractor Agreements. The recipient shall submit all Subcontractor Agreements to the CITY for review prior to the release of any funds to the subcontractor. The recipient shall withhold funds to any subcontractor agency that fails to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and their respective Subcontractor Agreement. (1) Recovered Materials Recipient shall make maximum use of products containing recovered materials that are EPA-designated items unless the product cannot be acquired competitively within a timeframe providing for compliance with the contract performance

City Council
14 –
86 7/21/2026

schedule; Meeting contract performance requirements; or at a reasonable price. Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines webpage: https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. The Contractor also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. (2) Domestic Preference for ProcurementsRecipient should, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for thepurchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the UnitedStates. This includes, but is not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and othermanufactured products.For purposes of this clause:Produced in the United States means, for iron and steel products, that allmanufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application ofcoatings, occurred in the United States.Manufactured products mean items and construction materials composed in wholeor in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-basedproducts such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass,including optical fiber; and lumber.Termination for Cause and Convenience – Should recipient fail for any reason to complywith the contractual obligations of this agreement within the time specified by this Agreement, theCITY reserves the right to terminate the Agreement, reserving all rights under state and federallaw.Contractual/Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract – Should recipient fail for any reasonto comply with the contractual obligations of this Agreement and/or willfully, knowingly ornegligently breach any term, condition or requirement of the agreement, City may any other remedy available pursuant to the Agreement of the laws then in effect.25. NOTICEAny notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreementshall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City:

City Council
14 –
87 7/21/2026

City ClerkCity of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30) P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988 With courtesy copies to: Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21) P.O. Box 1988Santa Ana, California 92702To Consultant: Dany Hana, PE, MS, MBA Project Manager/Principal Agent Kleinfelder, Inc. 24411 Ridge Route Drive, Suite 225 Laguna Hills, CA 92653 A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 23. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONSa. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has thepower, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms ofthis Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs andattorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authorityor power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fullyset forth in the body of this Agreement.

City Council
14 –
88 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
89 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT A

City Council
14 –
90 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

EXHIBIT 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

City Council
14 –
91 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

City Council
14 –
92 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

City Council
14 –
93 7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

City Council
14 –
94 7/21/2026

EXHIBIT B

City Council
14 –
95 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
96 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
97 7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A kleinfelder.com
A.Cover LetterCity of Santa Ana – Public Works Agency-22Electronic Submittal via PlanetBids.com Subject: Request for Proposal for On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059Apleased to submit our proposal to provide On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services for the City of Santa Ana (City). Working directly for the City under the current Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services contractcompleted Capital Improvement Programs and construction projects. Our experience will support the Cityand maintenance of projects. relationships witbench of in-ity with innovative solutions to successfully meet the contract requirements within the scheduled time frame and budget.--quality manner. please note the following attributes of our team:1. and -standing familiarity with state and local requirements. 2. Services section of this RFP .We have extensive experience successfully providing comprehensive services on an on-call basis for numerous local among others throughout the Southern California region. Our experience providing on-call services for these entities makes us well suited to execute the requested services for the City. A 20 minutes of dollars in materials testing and special inspection services annually to local public works agencies. A local in-house Materials Testing and Special Inspection Team of 60+ multi--house Materials TTechniciansSpecial Iquick turnaround for short-notice construction schedules and deadlines helping the City avoid delays or claims. Our textensive and current accreditations. Our robust internal Quality Management Program provides the City with a piece of mind that the scope of work and task order deliverables conform to the City’sminimizing unnecessary revisions and saving time and cost.commitments for Kleinfelder. This proposal shall remain valid for a period of 180 days following the submission deadline. Kleinfelder, Inc./ Principal [email protected]

City Council
14 –
98 7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
99 7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A kleinfelder.com | 1
B.Services Provided-stop-shop” A-E consultant and offers the City comprehensive services from our in-house team to support projects at any stage—from planning and development through project closeout. Our ability to offer these services locally and under one management team, will benefit the City by providing a more efficient and streamlined effort, as well as time and cost savings. Our team’s ability to provide support throughout the lifecycle of your projects will benefit the City by: Providing continuity at every project stageFacilitating more efficient and streamlined communicationEnsuring conformance to plans and specificationsReducing uncertainties during constructionConfirming construction is of a high qualityKleinfelder has carefully reviewed the RFP and Scope of Services-to support this contract in providing materials testing and special inspection services. Using knowledge obtained from working with the City over the past five years on the current contract’ve included our in-house capabilities to provide construction and environmental services to give the City greater flexibility when project needs arise. MATERIALS TESTING & SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICESWith over 60 in-house multi-certified Southern California Materials Testing Technicians and Special Inspector resourcessource inspection. Our Materials Testing Technicians and Special Inspectors perform the services listed in the table below which also include specialty additional services the City may request throughout the contract lifecycle. Kleinfelder’s local in-house team can perform the complete scope of services listed in the RFP. Kleinfelder’s in-house technicians and inspectors are encouraged to obtain advanced certifications from local and nationally recognized y of )-the State All our Materials Testers and Special Inspectors are experienced and cross-trained in providing field observation and testing services on differing construction applications providing cost savings to the City.Kleinfelder’s Materials Engineers work with design and owner/client professionals to provide technical knowledge and expertise -destructive and destructive testing programs suited to specific needs. By working closely with p-competing elements Kleinfelder’s mtraffic signalsand other public infrastructure. Our team will support the City's Quality Assurance program to determine the suitability of materials used for the construction with field and laboratory testing performed in accordance with the City’s Standards and Procedures using methods. Project examples (detailed in Section E.) includesimilar work for the City and other local public works agencies over the past 20 years.

Our in-house multi-certified staff provide the following benefits to the City:Ability to inspect multiple aspects of a project from start to finish, maintaining continuity, and minimizing disruption throughout construction.Adaptability to handle unexpected changes in scope, which eliminates the need to change or switch out staff.Increased delivery efficiencies and reductions to man-hours needed to complete the required materials testingand special inspections.MATERIALS TESTING & SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES CAPABILITIESConstruction Observation & Materials TestingSpecial InspectionsFoundation ExcavationsSubgrade PreparationConcrete Block & Brick MasonryRock Anchor PlacementAsphalt Concrete Testing and EvaluationReinforcement PlacementSteel/Rebar Weld & Splice Testing and InspectionAsphalt/Concrete CoringRoofing/WaterproofingProfilograph and Skid Resistant TestingFormwork ConstructionRock Materials TestingIn-situ Ground Improvement Testing & InspectionCompaction Testing of Aggregate Asphalt ConcreteSource InspectionBackfill PlacementBatch Plant InspectionPortland Cement Concrete Sampling & TestingMasonry ConstructionPavement Testing & InspectionHardness TestingAnchor Bolts & FasteningSteel Construction Grading InspectionSoil ImprovementInspectionLoad TestsUnderpinningAsphalt Concrete Forensic InvestigationEnvironmental Reinforced ConcreteStructural Steel High Strength BoltingStructural Steel WeldingPrestressed/Post-Tension ConcreteFireproofingFirestoppingStructural MasonryNon-Coatings/PaintingSoil NailingPost-Installed AnchorsFibrwrap

City Council
14 –
100
7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A kleinfelder.com | 2
KLEINFELDER’S MATERIALS TESTING AND SPECIAL INSPECTION SERVICES: SPECIAL EXPERTISEKleinfelder’s Project Manager/Principal Agentis an active member of the California Asphalt Pavement Association (CalAPA) and serves on the Greenbook Committee – Asphalt Concrete Task Force. pavement testing and inspection procedures. Mr. Hanna will work closely with our inspection staff to ensure the City gets the added benefit of his expertise on your pavement projects.Many of our field staff possess multiple Caltrans certifications and have performed materials testing services on -depth knowledge of Caltrans policies and Kleinfelder has in-house inspection staff located in Kleinfelder offices within miles of the large structural steel fabricators in the western states. We have the added benefit of using these staff to perform the work for off-site fabrication inspection services in an effort to and avoid travel/lodging expenses resulting in a direct cost savings to the City.

Accredited Laboratories.Kleinfelder maintains three laboratories in Southern California located in Cerritos, Ontario, and San Diego. These laboratories are fully accredited and are fully equipped for testing each type of material referenced in the RFP includingaggregate basePortland cement concrete-variety of additional construction materials. Samples of construction materials will be delivered to our laboratories for testing and analysis by Laboratory Technicians certified for the test methods required. Kleinfelder is committed to providing accurate and reliable laboratory test results through the implementation of our Quality Management Program. est results are subject to a quality review services. Laboratory test reports will be forwarded electronically to the City’s representatives and designated team members within 24 hours of testingresults of testing will indicate whether the material did or did not meet the requirements of the project specifications. The City’s representatives and our Quality Assurance Manager will be notified immediately if a sample fails to meet specifications so that an alternate plan may be implemented.100% of the laboratory testing for the City’s projects will be performed in Kleinfelder’s in-house laboratories. Our laboratories meet the ASTM E-sreporting. Our compliance with ASTM E-national agencies and organizations: LABORATORY ACCREDIDATIONS/CERTIFYING AGENCIESAmerican Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)Caltrans (CTM)Cement & Concrete Reference Laboratory (CCRL)City of Los Angeles Metropolitan Transportation Agency (LA Metro)National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)Kleinfelder Quality . We are extremely acquainted with the implemented City and County Quality Assurance Programsand have successfully adhered to their specified requirements on dozens of local projects. Our KQMP is aligned with the City and County Quality Assurance Programs and is designed to be consistent with the requirements of ANSI/ISO/ASQ Q9001-2008. Our KQMP consists of two parts which include a written overview of Kleinfelder’s quality expectations and the specific endorsed Kleinfelder Quality Procedures (KQPs). This plan will be utilized to verify sampling and testing isperformed correctly and to processes tthe corrective actions taken upon findings. Our KQMP also includes a continuous review and as needed modifications to our processes to stay up to date with industry changes and best practices that can benefit the City and Kleinfelder.CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICESIn support of our materials testing and special inspection services, we are including our construction management capabilities and qualifications to demonstrate our full suite of services available to the City.Kleinfelder’s Construction Management Team is staffed with skilled and experienced and small public works projects throughout Southern California. Our staff successfully administers and inspects all aspects of public works projects including but not limited to: constructability reviews; submittal reviews/responses including for complex items such as falsework and shoring; RFI reviews/responses; surveying; project layout; and inspection of all items including underground utilities and drainution; Cal/OSHA compliance; SWP

City Council
14 –
101
7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A kleinfelder.com | 3
KLEINFELDER’S CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES: SPECIAL EXPERTISEOur diverse in-house experience in construction engineering and design allows us to provide comprehensive roject closeout.Our team includes access to over 80 experienced and available construction services staff. These individuals can be drawn upon as-needed to provide additional inspection and/or specialty services for the City. -builts; and developing final reports. We take a proactive approach to providing construction management t while maintaining the highest possible quality. traffic safety-between (project examples detailed in Section E.). Working directly with almost every government agency in Southern California as ecord of performance includes successfully delivering over $200M worth of as-needed construction management and inspection services on over 700 task orders for numerous Southern California public works agencies. This extensive experience has proven our ability to manage multidimensional teams, anticipate challenges, coordinate with stakeholders, and develop innovative solutions to promote effective actions. work quality. We teach our team “leadership at every level.”ownership of their jobs and make themselves invaluable to our clients. Our engineers and inspectors will know the contract moving. We will manage the schedule and work closely with the contractor to resolve issues and keep the project on track. This nd repeat business.Kleinfelder’s staff willuality work products are prodinspection for all the work on the project by providing turnkey service to the City. Construction Safety:general public. We work to stay vigilant on and off the jobsite and always keep safety a top priority.This starts with a l -mails containing a safety topic relevant to our work or time Construction Safet CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES CAPABILITIESTypes of ServicesBy Project PhaseWe have the availability to provide the followingservices under this contract, including but not limited to:Program ManagementProject ManagementConstruction Management/Resident EngineeringWaste/Recycling (Landfills)Utility CoordinationCPM Scheduling/ReviewConstructability ReviewOffice EngineeringClaims ResolutionContract AdministrationCost EstimatingContract Change Orders Labor Compliance Support Public Relations and Community OutreachPre-Construction PhaseConstructability ReviewsReview of Contractor BidsNotice to ProceedPre-construction Project Site SurveyPre-construction MeetingContractor CoordinationConstruction PhaseSafetySurveyingSWPPP ComplianceCPM Schedule ReviewField InspectionCoordinate MeetingsCost Engineering/EstimatingContract Changes/Change OrdersPost Construction PhasePunchlist and Final Walk-through Contract Closeout

City Council
14 –
102
7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A kleinfelder.com | 4
GEOTECHNICAL SERVICESIn support of our materials testing and special inspection services, we are including our geotechnical capabilities and qualifications to demonstrate our full suite of services available to the City.Our local in-house team of 86 Geotechnical will work closely and seamlessly to deliver a successful project. We will work with appropriate stakeholders including Ciand budget expectations. Kleinfelder’s Geotechnical Services Team supported numerous City projects under the current On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection contract. ns and -effective recommendations. Our identification of geotechnical design and performance issues is also reliant on the observations of We conduct geologic and geotechnical analyses for resolution of design issues with state-of-the-practice techniques and tools tailored to the needs of the assignment. Kleinfelder’s geotechnical engineering projects range in size and complexity from conventional shallow spread-footing systems for r. Project examples (detailed in Section E.) includesimilar work for the City and other local public works agencies over the past 20 years. have performed recent geotechnical services on projects in and around the City and our local knowledge and experience in areas of complex and hazardous geologic environments will be of added value to the City where slope stability and active earthquake faulting information needed to address the anticipated conditions for the proposed design and/or construction. Our geotechnical expertise is listed in the table below.GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES CAPABILITIESSite Investigation and AnalysisConstruction Monitoring including Pre-Construction Soil Exploration and TestingGeophysical SurveysLife Cycle Cost Analysis & Rehabilitation/Reconstruction Methods for Pavementsoand PavementEmbankment Restoration and ConstructionSettlement Analysis and MitigationLiquefaction Evaluation and MitigationIn-Situ Ground Improvements and Monitoringand Aquifer CharacterizationSlope Grading Excavation and GradingSoil Erosion and Sedimentation ControlInfiltration Testing and Stormwater Capture StudiesLiterature and Aerial Photographic ReviewSubsurface wCPT Seismic and Geologic Hazard EvaluationFault Rupture Hazard Evaluations and StudiesRockfall Hazard Evaluation and MitigationPercolation TestingRecommendations for Septic SystemsObservation and Testing of Fill and Backfill Material for Moisture Content and CompactionRing Infiltrometer TestingGeomorphologyLaboratory Testing of Purposed Fill MaterialGround Improvement Evaluation and MonitoringObservation oBedrock Retaining and Buried StructuresSewerTrenchless Technology Free-Standing and Retained Retaining StructuresTemporary and Permanent Tie-Back WallsMSE WallsShoring and Sheet PilingPipe Jacking and TunnelingCut & Cover ExcavationsFoundation EngineeringShallow FoundationsMats or RaftsSpread or Continuous FootingsPost Tensioned SlabsFoundation Building Settlement Other Engineering GeologyGeologic ReconnaissanceNaturally Occurring Asbestos EvaluationsLandslide InvestigationsWaste/Recycling (Landfills)HydrogeologyRock & Soil Slope Stability EvaluationsRock Engineering & Field MappingGeomechanical Rock Mass ClassificationGeomorphologyGeologic Hazards AssessmentForensic GeologyRock Expert Witness TestimonyEarth Slopes and EmbankmentsNatural Slope Stability (Soil and Rock Slopes)Landslide Investigations and MitigationEmbankment Temporary ExcavationsButtress Reinforced Earth Slopes & Embankments

City Council
14 –
103
7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A kleinfelder.com | 5
KLEINFELDER’S GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES: SPECIAL EXPERTISEOur geotechnical staff has been involved in performing numerous liquefactionity. Our staff is local and can provide emergency response to the City within two hours or less if requested. We have done so on several projects located in around both the City and within the County of Orange. information and recommendations during site selection to help develop feasible design plans. Our experience and solutions-oriented focus allow us tosuccessfully reduce risks associated with site development and restoration.

KLEINFELDER’S ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: SPECIAL EXPERTISEProven provider of environmental on-PFAS treatment system design on critical infrastructure projects.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESIn support of our materials testing and special inspection services, we are including our environmental capabilities and qualifications to demonstrate our full suite of services available to the City.Kleinfelder has a distinguished record of delivering -call contracts for municipalities and agencies throughout Southern California. Our firm’s environmental services portfolio regulations. Our firm’s ability to mobilize multidisciplinary teams and resources on short notice has enabled the successful execution of numerous concurrent assignments under on--house professionals regulatory coordination.Kleinfelder’s Environmental Services Team supported numerous City projects under the current On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection contract. Orange County and among others. Notable on-call Project examples (detailed in Section E.) includesimilar work for the City and other local public works agencies over the past 20 years.These assignments demonstrate Kleinfelder’s capacity to address complex environmental challenges and deliver high-quality solutions tailored to the unique needs of Orange County agencies and communities.

Related Support ServicesResearch aTechnical Knowledge including StandardsSite Inspection/ReconnaissanceUtilities Coordination and Subsurface ExplorationRight Field Construction MonitoringLaboratory TestingMeetingsEvaluations and Recommendations (Reporting)Geotechnical Specifications/Final ReportingRecommendationsIllustrations/MappingAuthentication ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CAPABILITIESTypes of ServicesHazardous Materials Testing and CertificationOngoing Consultation and Regular MonitoringRemediation and Abatement Reports and ComplianceSupportAir Monitoring (IOSoil apor)Soils and AggregatePolychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)RadonProject Coordination and PermittingMonitoring Post-RemediationSolid and Hazardous Wastegroundwater) Mercury-Containing MaterialsTesting for all Other Potential Hazards in SAWor Building Structures.

City Council
14 –
104
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
105
7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A kleinfelder.com | 6
C. Firm & Team Experiencematerials testing and special inspectionconstruction managementenvironmental firms. track record of providing services on public works-related projects with approximately 90% of our current workload in Southern California being performed directly for public works agencies and owners. Kleinfelder does not work for contractors and/or material suppliers giving the City piece of mind that we are free from any perceived conflicts of interest on your projects. timeliness and efficiency ks design and construction. We specialize in delivering comprehensive services providing quality assurance aggregateand environmental. This team understands what it takes to successfully deliver these important capital improvement projects and the unique issues associated with working within the City. We take a proactive approach to providing expertise combining experience and industry knowledge with an emphasis on problem solving.We are currently providing materials testing and special inspection services for the City and are confident in our ability to continue delivering high quality services on this contract. The map above shows our Southern California operations in and around Orange County and includes seven offices and/ordemonstrating our close proximity tosupport the City of Santa Ana. We are accustomed to serving as an extension of public agency staff and will continue to perform g and special inspection services. three local in-we will mobilize quickly to meet highly technical project requirements and make our resources available on short notice.GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF FIRMCompany-Local: 380+ (Southern CA)Number of employees working directly with City on this agreement111Nearest address serving the City and headquarters addressHeadquarters PROJECT MANAGER / PRINCIPAL AGENT -PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACTM | 909.376.6128 E | [email protected] Professional EngineerExtensive Public Agency Experience25 Years of Contract Management ExperienceManages Multiple On-Call Contracts Organization Chart & Key PersonnelThe organization chart presented on the following page graphically depicts the resources we have selected to serve under the Ci experienceProject Manager/Principal Agentand our designated key personnel are committed to remaining fully available for the contract duration. The resources shown in our organization chart will be made 100 percent available as-needed to support City projects. Should 380+ resources located at no additional cost to the City.

City Council
14 –
106
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
107
7/21/2026

City of Santa AnaOn-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 8
Brief overviews for key personnel identified on the organization chart with a key symbol are presented below. Following the key personnel bioson page 11 is a matrix highlighting our Materials Testers and Special Inspectors’ qualifications as it aligns with the needs of this contract.All proposed staff selected for this contract are committed in--known ity. following Section E.Each resume complies with the RFP requirements description of roleof similar projects and the assigned function and responsibility related to the proposed work.Dany Hanna, PE, MBA| Project Manager/Principal Agent|Fully Available to Support this ContractMBA, Finance; MS, Civil Engineering (Pavement); BS, Civil Engineering; PE, Civil, CA, No. 7099625 years of experience as Principal-In-Engineer for numerous municipal agency contracts in Southern California. Understands the need for continuous communication with the client to exceed the client’s needs and sense of urgency to provide qualified and committed individuals to successfully complete the work on time and within budget. He will continue to ensure that the Kleinfelder team meets the City’s needs and requirements forthis on-call contract.City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On-Call Testing & Inspection Services-Call Field Materials Testing & Batch Plant Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-City of Ontario: As-City of Long Beach: As-and Materials Testing & Inspection Bryan Reese, CSP| Health & Safety Manager| Fully Available to Support this ContractBS, Biology; Certified Safety Professional (CSP) No. CSP-40075; OSHA: Confined Space Entry; CPR & First-Aid No. 169453591120154; OSHA: 40-Hour HAZWOPER & 30-Hour Construction Safety & Health21 years of experience as a Health and Safety (H&S) Manager supporting environmental and construction -City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On-Testing & Inspection Services-Call Field Materials Testing & Batch Plant Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-City of Ontario: As-City of Long Beach: As- and MaterialsTesting& InspectionMike Dorsch| Quality Assurance Manager|Fully Available to Support this ContractRadiation Safety Officer (RSO) No. 50134; Nuclear Gauge Operator; PMQS Certified19 years of experience providing operational and management support for large-scale construction programs throughout Southern California. Instrumental in writing and implementing quality assurance plans and enforcing quality standards forHe will work closely with the City and Kleinfelder’s Laboratory Managersprofessionals to ensure the quality of all services and deliverables conform tothethe and the City’s expectations.City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On-Testing & Inspection Services-Call Field Materials Testing & Batch Plant Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-City of Ontario: As-City of Long Beach: As-and Materials Testing & Inspection KLEINFELDER’S KEY PERSONNELOur team of key personnel were hand selected based on their extensive years of technical expertise; relevant for the relevant scope of services under this contract.

City Council
14 –
108
7/21/2026

City of Santa AnaOn-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 9
Amber Parker| Task Order Manager |Fully Available to Support this ContractPMQS Certified28 years of experience in the construction industry as a a large variety of City and County projects underlocal jurisdictional authoritiesHCAIExperienced with the oversight and management of projects subject to prevailing wageCommunity Workforce Aand Project Labor Agreements. As sheproposal preparationestimationOrange County Public Works: On- Testing & Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-City of Ontario: As-City of Long Beach: As-and Materials Testing & Inspection : As-Needed Construction InspectionSpecial Inspection & Materials Testing ServicesAnouar Kartite, PE| Task OrderManager |Fully Available to Support this ContractMS, Civil Engineering, MS, Business Administration; PE, Civil, CA, No. 7098220 years of experience serving as Task Order Manager for multiple on-testing and special inspection services. He ensures the timely delivery of task order requests throughout His His experience demonstrates his ability to manage concurrent task orders efficiently for public agencies clients across California. City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On- Testing & Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-City of Ontario: As-Matt Burris, PE, QSD| Construction Management Services|Fully Available to Support this ContractBS, Civil Engineering; PE, Civil, CA, No. 93830; Qualified SWPPP Developer in California, No. 28125ACI: Concrete Field-Testing Technician, Grade I No. 02179960; OSHA 30-HR, Caltrans Resident Engineer Academy Certification12 years of experience delivering on-call and task-order construction management services as a Resident h Mr. Burris brings a strong working knowledge of Caltrans and USACE requireeffectively with project owners and stakeholders.Orange County Transportation Authority: Laguna Niguel to San Juan Capistrano Passing Siding-Call Construction Management Services: San Clemente Pavement Rehabilitation -Call Construction Management Services: SR-241 Culvert Improvements, PE, GE| Geotechnical Services|Fully Available to Support this ContractMS, Civil Engineering, BS, Civil Engineering; PE, Civil, CA, No. 70342; GE, CA, No. 294726 years of experience providing geotechnical services on on-call contracts throughout Southern California. He has served as Lead Geotechnical Engineer for more than 100 on-call projects for municipal construction support for a wide range of infrastructure projects delivered under multi-year on-call agreements.City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On- Testing & Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-City of Ontario: As-City of Long Beach: As-and Materials Testing & InspectionCity of Industry: As-Needed Materials Testing and Geotechnical Engineering Services

City Council
14 –
109
7/21/2026

City of Santa AnaOn-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 10
Richard Stevenson, CAC, Lead I/A| Environmental Services|Fully Available to Support this ContractBS, Environmental and Earth Science; Lead Inspector/Assessor/Project Environmental Monitor No. LRC-00000991;Certified Asbestos Consultant No. 06-3992; Lead Based Paint Inspector No. LBP-I-I168628-3; Lead Based Paint Inspector No. LRC-0000099227 leadabatement specification and operations and maintenance Stevenson also manages task orders on several on-call contracts as well as stand-alone projects for clients throughout S County of Los Anand the Port of Long Beach. He is regarded as a highly experienced go-to consultant by many public agencies to address complex or rapid response scenarios pertaining to hazardous building materials including asbestos and lead. City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-City of Long Beach: As-and Materials Testing & InspectionChris Barry| Materials Testing & Special Inspection Services|Fully Available to Support this ContractCertifications: ACI; ICC; Caltrans; Nuclear Gauge; AMPP; TWIC; OSHA-10; Fall Protection; Confined Space8 years of experience providing on-call materials testing and special inspection services for public works and capital improvement programs. He performsreinforced inspectionses with City Is crews to deliver projects in compliance with specifications and industry standards. His background includes successful roles on public and privateprojects throughout Southern California and he has serviced over 50 projects within the City of Santa Ana.City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On- Testing & Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-| Materials Testing & Special Inspection Services|Fully Available to Support this ContractCertifications: ACI; ICC; Caltrans; NICET II; PCI II; RSO; Nuclear Gauge; Fall Protection; Confined Space20 years of experience delivering on-call materials testing and special inspection nuclear gauge compincluding the City of Santa City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On- Testing & Inspection ServicesCity of Long Beach: As-and Materials Testing & InspectionMichaelMagana| Materials Testing & Special Inspection Services|Fully Available to Support this ContractCertifications: ACI; ICC; Caltrans; NICET III; PCI II; RSO; Nuclear Gauge; OSHA-10; Fall Protection; Confined Space28 years of quality assurance experience specializing in materials testing and special inspection services for citcand public works agencies. He provides field and laboratory materials testing of and masonry. His experience includes concrete and asphalt batch plant inspectionand local agency standards.City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On- Testing & Inspection ServicesCity of Ontario: As-Eric Kennedy| Materials Testing & Special Inspection Services|Fully Available to Support this ContractCertifications: ACI; ICC; Nuclear Gauge; County of Los Angeles; Fall Protection; TWIC; FallProtection; Confined Space24 years of experience providing on-call materials testing and special inspection a master special inspector and has served as Lead Inspector on large-fabrication monitoring. City of Santa Ana: On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection ServicesOrange County Public Works: On- Testing & Inspection ServicesCounty of Los Angeles: As-

City Council
14 –
110
7/21/2026

City of Santa AnaOn-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 11
Presented below is a matrix highlighting our Materials Testers and Special Inspectors’ availability, years of experience, certifications, and specific experience aligned with the scope of services presented in the City’s RFP. Special Inspectors & Materials TestersCERTIFICATIONSEXPERIENCEChris Barry 100%8Eric Kennedy100%23Jeff Diaz100%20Michael Magana100%28Alexis Millan100%15Bryan Dominguez100%5Carl De La Torre100%15Carlo Hanna100%2Casey Bunker 100%5Chris Rice100%6Christopher Bunker100%25Dalton Brandenburg100%12Damani Lowe100%8David Magana100%5Diana Gallo100%8Dominic Montemayor Sr. 100%20Donald Lehr100%10Eddie Jabbour100%12Ethan Rowley100%15Frank Mina100%21Geoffrey Swink100%26Gus Rossow100%7Jacob Paugh100%5James Reeves100%27Javier Santiago100%3Jesse Gastelum100%30Joaquin Moreno100%12John Luis100%4Jonathan Shoulders100%11Jorge Rodriguez100%3Justin Gordon-Niemietz100%5Kevin Widzinski100%8Kim Byrd100%42Marcus Molina100%8Martin Hernandez100%10Mike Carman100%36Mike Dillon100%5Nat Echevarria Gatarz100%7Noah Sabo100%2Omar Molina100%4Oscar Noriega100%26Reese Koltvet100%5Richie Unger100%6Ricky Bunker100%2Ryon Seau100%9Sarah Duarte100%10Sasa Milivojevic100%11Scott Morris100%28Theodore Brown100%3Thomas Rebosky100%30Vartan Deirdeirian100%36William Cruze100%5

City Council
14 –
111
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
112
7/21/2026

City of Santa AnaOn-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 12
D. PROPOSED WORK PLANThe best way to describe our approach and work plan to managing task orders under this contract is to walk through an example task order and describe the seven steps to our approach (the graphic presented to the left outlines the seven steps). It should be noted that this methodology is scalable and that depending on the specific requirements of each assignment.Step1: Project Kick-Off MeetingWe believe that personal face-to-face contact is important to develop a strong and trusting relationship. Our project team will meet with the City’s representatives to initialize the project requirements. Communication controls and expectations will be clearly outlined for future activities. The primary goal is to have a mutual understanding of the City’s expectations of Kleinfelder’s performance for the required materials testing and special inspection activities. With a clear understanding of the expectations, unanticipated changes or surprises can be dramatically reduced.At thiswe will review the planssand construction schedule; understand the scope of services; and provide options for consideration.Step 2: Identification of Schedule andBudgetconstruction we will prepare aproposed scope of services and cost estimate for the City. The construction schedule and activities will have a large impact on the requirements and duration of our services. It isboth from aagreed-upon schedule and budget to follow andprocess. These elements will help us toprovide the City with progress benchmarks, both from a financial and construction viewpoint.Step 3: Staffing and ResourceManagement PlanOur Project Manager/Principal AgentMr.will work with our Quality Assurance Managerto assign a properly qualified Task Order Manager who will manage the task and work closely the individual that attended the kickoff meeting. Kleinfelder will build each task order team starting with a Task Order Manager knowledgeable with thescope of work and project requirements. Technical specialists and support staff from our internal teamand subconsultants will be involved as necessary to support the scope of work and deliver a quality final56LABORATORY TESTING• User Friendly Reporting• Rapid Turnaround• Immediate Client EngagementPROJECT MANAGEMENT & CONTROLS• Real Time Budget/Scheduling• Look Ahead/Milestones• Peer Review / QA/QC4 7 PROJECT KICK-OFF MEETING• Project Understanding• Define Objectives & Goals• Identify the Project Team• Meet with the Project Team• Develop Communication Plan• Collaborate with PartnersIDENTIFICATIONOFSCHEDULE & BUDGET• Review Plans & Project Schedule• Identify Project Milestones• Cost DevelopmentSTAFFING & RESOURCEMANAGEMENT PLAN• Multidisciplinary Staff• Central Dispatching• Deep Bench with Kleinfelder REPORTING & CLOSEOUT• Post-project Analysis• Lessons Learned• Improve 123TESTING & INSPECTION• Value Added Field Services• Real-time Electronic Reporting• Non-compliance Tracking

City Council
14 –
113
7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 13
product. We will assign the most qualified and appropriately experienced staff members for each task to ensure quality and efficiency for the project’s duration. We then hold an internal kickoff meeting with designated staff to review project practices. As a part of our resource planning we will develop availability matrix which includes all staff proposed forthis including our subconsultants. This matrix is qualifications of our entire team. This allows us to respond quickly to staffing requests whether planned or at short notice. While 24-hour advance notice is anticipated for dispatching, we can typically cover projects with as few as 4 hours or less. For projects where services are required on a full-time a qualified multi-certified Lead Materials Tester/Special Inspector to reduce the cost associated with the need for more than one Materials Tester/Special Inspector for multiple operations at the site. If the job sequence requires more than one Materials Tester/Special Inspectorsupplemental Materials Testers/Special Inspectors (upon City approval) who will be delegated tasks by our Lead Materials Tester/Special Inspector . Step 4: Materials Testing & Special Inspection Services We understand that the City will need Materials Testers and Special Inspectors assigned to individual projects to support the City’s projects. Based on will select the appropriately qualified and certified Materials Testers/Special Inspectors and submit their resumes and qualifications to the City for approval. These Materials Testers/Special Inspectors will act as an extension of the City’s staff and provide a wide range of duties as requested with their assignment duration varying depending on the nature of the work. City will need Materials Testers/Special Inspectors certified by and AMPP to provide in the fields. All of Kleinfelder’s Materials Testers/Special Inspectors are multi-certified and can provide continuity and efficiency as a project moves from task to task through multiple construction phases and material types. We recognize that the scheduling of our Materials Testers/Special Inspectors will come directly from the City. Once notified of the time and location where our personnel ispatch Team will schedule the appropriate personnel and equipment for assignment within the s notice requirements. Our Materials Testers/Special Inspectors will become sign in and out daily with the City inspection and testing which will clearly document records of time and work performed on forms and documents provided or approved the City. Our Materials Testers/Special Inspectors will review safety protocols and safe work practices for each activity and participate in daily safety tailgate meetings prior to the start of work and come prepared with the correct PPE and equipment calibrated to existing standards with they will contact our based on communication with the City’s onsite representative. our Materials Testers/Special Inspectors are equipped with pdf and our FieldNet reporting software. Kleinfelder utilizes our enables our staff to collect prepare effortlessly upload information to data management and automatically generate reports using tablets in the field. FieldNet quality on projects field and other records will be provided to the City’s onsite representative each day for review and signature and delivered to Kleinfelder’s Task Order Manager on a daily basis. If a City representative is not our Materials Testers/Special Inspectors will contact the City representative and provide the results of testing and time spent onsite. Reports and test results will be transmitted electronically to the City’s staff and designated representatives. The daily reports are reviewed for quality conformance with Kleinfelder’s written guidelines for field documentation. Our Materials Testers/Special Inspectors will maintain a list of non-compliance issues and track resolution of these items. In document and track re-inspection and re-testing so the City may back-charge the contractor for these additional costs, if desired. As part of our Quality Management Program our Project Manager/Principal AgentHealth & Safety MQuality Assurance and/or Task Order Managers may visit the project sites periodically to review the Materials Testers /Special Inspectors files and observe their work and safety practices.

City Council
14 –
114
7/21/2026

City of Santa AnaOn-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 14
Step 5: Laboratory TestingSamples of construction materials will be delivered to our local laboratories for testing and analysis by our in-house certified Laboratory Technicians. Our Laboratory Manager reviews the data and distributes a typed report within 24 hours of testing indicating whether the material did or did notmeet the requirements of the project specifications. TheCity and Kleinfelder’s Quality Assurance Manager will be notified immediatelyif a sample fails to meet specifications so that an alternate plan may be implemented.Step 6: Project Management and ControlsThe management of our processes will be a valuable tool forthe City to assess not only the acceptability of theprogress of the project. The key to success on any project begins with a strong Project Manager/Principal Agent who isand practices proactivecommunication strategies. Mr.leadership is focused on a team approach with proactive communication to:1.Provide successful project execution including a detailedrealisticand mutually agreedupon budget2.Strategically coordinate and allocate resources withinKleinfelder3.Ensure project quality at all levels of planningdeliveryand closeout4.Ensure safetyand procedures implemented to monitor these project components: project execution (scopeand budget)and safety.

Kleinfelder maintains a team of internal Project Controllers who actively work on large-scale programs to reduce project owner risk through active real time tracking and reportingregarding these items.Scope and Budget Control:The ability to keep a project within the original scope and budget is a result of defining a complete scope. Identifying a clear purpose and need for the work and the intended outcome is critical to this task. With well-ets will be and scheduling controls will identifywork that could be out of scope or does not contribute to thedesired outcome. These monitoring efforts will control thebudget and eliminate out-of-scope work proceeding withoutproper approvals. Where a change of scope becomes Manager.Quality Management: Kleinfelder implements and maintains a robust Quality Management Program (QMP) and based on the ISO 9001 includes three major stepsandwhich have been written for our role as engineering professionals. No single QMP policy can ensure overall quality; it is the people and culture at Kleinfelder who bring this to the table.Kleinfelder will develop a customized Quality Assurance / Quality Control Plan for each task order executed under this contract.We believe that a written project quality plan is the key ingredient of our QMP and is required Our Quality Assurance Managerwill lead QA/QC adherence to the project and that City requirements have been met. If any errors or omissions e will to mitigate potential production delays and costs.

ClientCoordination
Deliverable Coordination
QA/QC
Safety/LPS
Reporting/ Project Closeout

City Council
14 –
115
7/21/2026

City of Santa AnaOn-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 15
Kleinfelder's Commitment to Safety: Kleinfelder employs the LPS® (Loss Prevention System) program in all our work practices.A site-specific Health and Safety Plan will be developed for each City project under this contract enforce safe behavior prior to being inserted into our QA/QC Plan. It is safe to Kleinfelder goes well beyond the thought of working safely by employing the LPS® program in all our work practices. The basis of LPS® is reducing losses (both or behaviors and providingthe means to mitigate them. All our employees are trained to evaluate their work potentialanda safe alternative.meetingstime. Job Loss Assessments (JLAs) are either pulled from our database or written practices. and document safe work procedures. Questionable behaviors are reviewed and discussed to identify the root causes and find appropriate solutions. These observations are logged in a database and analyzed to evaluate which practices are effectivein reducing unsafe behaviors. Losses andcommunicated to reduce the potential for reoccurrence. Kleinfelder is proud to have integrated the LPS system into our culture and we believe it sets our firm apart from our competitors by taking a more focused and proactive approach to safe work practices and empowering each employee to make safer choices.Kleinfelder willthe Kleinfelder’sInjury and Illness Prevention Program and Code of Safe Practices. Mr. Reese will be made available to abate identified potentialsafety hazards and shall have the authority and responsibility to shut down Kleinfelder’sif necessary. We have reviewed the RFP in detail and are committed to adhering to all the requirements presented in Section J – Safety Program Requirements and Section K – Other Safety Requirements.work at elevated levels or enter confined spacese have in-house experience and will provide trained and certified staff to perform this work on all City projects.Step 7: Reporting and Project CloseoutWe will provide the City’s onsite representative and other designated team members with a copy of allincluding:•reports (within 24 hours)•test results performed in the(within 24 hours of testing)•Project memos orrequests (as needed)•Budget status reports (weekly or monthly)•Invoices (monthly – along with backup in a formatby the City)•Any unusual or unanticipated activity or observations (as observed)•Project close-out report / letter certifying the project (completion of the project)Laboratory test reports will be forwarded electronically to the City’s representative and designated team members within 24 hours of testing. Failed test results will be reported immediately to the attention of the City’s representativeard copiescan be provided upon request. A final report will be prepared and submitted within five working days from completion of each projectdetailing our observations and testing performed in the field andand providing conclusions forsuitability and recommendations. Kleinfelder can also provide document control personnel for the project site to trackinspection and testingalong with other project items related to the construction services.

Our Health & Safety Manager andare knowledgeable of federal, state, local, and the City’s safety guidelines, and are focused on minimizing therisks associated with construction projects Our multi- Materials Testers and Special Inspectors provide cost savings for the City resources enables us to be highly responsive to project needs and meet short-notice construction schedules/ deadlines helping the City avoid delays or claims multiple aspects of a project maintain continuity through the construction process helpingthe City demonstrate consistency in testing & inspection

City Council
14 –
116
7/21/2026

City of Santa Ana On-Call Materials Testing and Special Inspection Services | RFP No. 26-059A Page | 16
On-Call Contracts - Potential Challenges & Kleinfelder’s Solutions Kleinfelder has performed services on hundreds of on-call materials testing and special inspection contracts similar to the City’s contract over the past 60+ years. We have developed a deep understanding of the potential issues that may arise related to our scope of service, and we have the in-house expertise to provide sound solutions to address these issues. The table below identifies some potential issues we may encounter on this contract along with our purposed solutions to remedy these situations. POTENTIAL CHALLENGES KLEINFELDER'S SOLUTION Monitoring Task Order Budgets and Tracking Expenses in Real Time We use our live accounting system (Deltek) that provides real-time task order and overall budget tracking. We check weekly burn rates to help us forecast budgets and will work closely with the City’s staff to understand the anticipated workload so we can accurately project task order burn rates looking forward. We will include these forecasted costs in our weekly progress reports so that we can monitor task order burn rates and reflect anticipated changes in workload. Emergency Requests and 24/7/365 Availability Due to the nature of the work, we expect last-minute service requests. Kleinfelder’s team has the resources to respond quickly—within 4 hours or less. Our local team is fully equipped to handle the City’s as-needed emergency response, night work, stand-by, holiday, and weekend requests. We have a dedicated, full-time centralized dispatch department familiar with the certification and inspection requirements for the City’s projects. Additionally, we will use a Resource Planning Matrix, updated weekly, to track our team’s experience, qualifications, certifications, and availability to efficiently meet the City’s staffing needs. Maintaining Consistent Quality of Deliverables Across Each Task Order Assigned We will prepare a customized Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan specifically tailored to each task order to provide the City with a piece of mind that the scope of work and task order deliverables conform to contract requirements, standards of practice, and the City’s expectations, minimizing unnecessary revisions and saving time and cost. Kleinfelder follows a well-established in-house review process utilized for all technical reports, design drawings, specifications, and project documents. Ensuring the Timeliness of Test Results and Deliverables Our team assigned to the project will start by clearly defining the expected turnaround time for test results and deliverables. We have established a standardized process for documenting and delivering test results. This includes specifying the required format, ensuring accuracy and completeness of the results, and providing necessary supporting documentation, including materials test reports, daily diaries, laboratory reports, special analysis reports, photos or other contract compliance documentation. Our well-organized and streamlined documentation process reduces the chances of delays caused by errors or missing information. Conflict of Interest We don’t foresee having any conflict of interest on this contract as over 90% of Kleinfelder’s current workload in Southern California is performed directly for Public Works agencies and owners. Kleinfelder does not work for contractors and/or material suppliers, giving the City assurance that we are free from any perceived conflicts. Maintaining Continuity of Staff to Service the City’s Projects We intend to utilize all staff proposed in our SOQ for this contract, many of which are currently supporting City projects under the current ongoing materials testing and special inspection contract. This will ensure a seamless transition, and our staff will require no learning curve and ramp up time to service upcoming City projects. Contractor’s Disputing Acceptance Results. {Contractor’s Quality Control (QC) Tests Results Pass and Kleinfelder’s Quality Assurance (QA) Test Results Fail} Kleinfelder has the in-house expertise to deal with this situation. Anytime there is a dispute between QC and QA test results there are several things that need to be checked and confirmed. Initially we would request calibration records of equipment for both labs to verify calibrated equipment was used, verify the accreditation of both labs along with certifications of both testers, check to see if it was a split sample, verify the calculations of both tests from the data sheets for all tests, and verify all equipment is working properly. Once all these items have been checked and both parties appear to have accurate information, we would work with the City to initiate dispute resolution testing. Kleinfelder has performed dispute resolution oversight in the past and understands this procedure. Working Under a Community Workforce Agreement (CWA)Kleinfelder is currently working under multiple CWA and PLA contracts throughout Southern California, including at the City of Santa Ana, City of Long Beach, and the County of Los Angeles. We understand the CWA process including faxing the Letter of Assent, Core Worker List, and Craft Request forms to the Union. Once we get the Union’s approval, we call in a dispatch order to have the employee pick up a dispatch slip and pay the Union dues and registration fee. We will report the monthly hours to the Operating Engineering Trust Fund (OETF) and make the required payment based on the number of hours worked. We submit bi-weekly CPR to the Labor Compliance Company. We might provide payroll statements if requested, and we submit the cancelled check for the OETF payment with the remittance confirmation to the labor compliance company. Additionally, we have added a materials testing and special inspection subconsultant (The Quality Firm) which is signatory to the Union to help meet the CWA requirements on this contract.

City Council
14 –
117
7/21/2026

EXHIBIT C

City Council
14 –
118
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
119
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
120
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
121
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
122
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
123
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
124
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
125
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
126
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
127
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
128
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
129
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
130
7/21/2026

DBE Certification No.: 47090SBE Certification No.: 2013113DIR 1000546459PERSONNEL RATES EXPLORATORY AND FIELD TESTING EQUIPMENTProfessional and Office StaffTask CodeStaff Type Cost RateTask CodeDescription Cost Rate1160 Geotechnical Engineer $250.00 /hour 6010 Mobile Laboratory $200.00 /day1101 Project Engineer $200.00 /hour 6017 Diamond Bit Core Rig and Generator $300.00 /day1200 Project Manager $195.00 /hour 6018 Nuclear Density Test Gage $50.00 /day2801 Quality Control Manager $200.00 /hour 6020 Ultrasonic Test Unit and Consumables $50.00 /day1401 Qualified SWPPP Developer $185.00 /hour 6021 Magnetic Particle Test Unit $50.00 /day1402 Qualified SWPPP Practitioner $175.00 /hour 6023 Schmidt Hammer $50.00 /day1102 Staff Engineer $175.00 /hour 6024 Torque Wrench $50.00 /day2990 Field Supervisor $195.00 /hour 6029 ASTM C1028 Coefficient of Friction $400.00 /day1230 Drafting $140.00 /hour 6051 Company Vehicle (If required) $1,200.00 /month1000 Administrative $85.00 /hourInspectors and Technicians Task CodeStaff Type Cost Rate2104 Quality Control Technician $190.00 /hour2002 ACI Concrete Technician $190.00 /hour2001 Soils Engineering Technician $190.00 /hour2910 Laboratory Technician $190.00 /hour2102 Public Works Technician $190.00 /hour2101 Public Works Inspector $190.00 /hour2106 Roadway Inspector $190.00 /hour2005 Structural Steel Inspector $190.00 /hour2601/02 Coring Technician $190.00 /hour2003 Pull | Torque Testing Technician $190.00 /hour2023 Special Inspector (ICC) $190.00 /hour2112 LA City Deputy Inspector $195.00 /hour2110 NACE Inspector $220.00 /hour2301 AWS Certified Welding Inspector Field $190.00 /hour2302 AWS Certified Welding Inspector Shop $185.00 /hour2303 Non-Destructive Testing ASNT Level II $200.00 /hour2304 Non-Destructive Testing ASNT Level III $250.00 /hour2703 UGL - Concrete Scanning $250.00 /hour2705 CCTV/Utility Locating Technician $250.00 /hour2305 Radiographic Testing Crew $450.00 /hour2109 Building Inspector $195.00 /hour2024 Firestop Inspector $210.00 /hour2572 Med Gas Inspection $210.00 /hour2805 Mitigation Monitor $200.00 /hour2810 SWPPP Inspector $200.00 /hour2900 Pick-up and Delivery of Test Specimens $150.00 /hour lly Funded Schedule of Fees
1 of

City Council
14 –
131
7/21/2026

LABORATORY TESTSAsphalt Tests Aggregate TestsTask CodeDescription Cost RateTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3201 ASTM D2726 Core Density (SSD) $55.00 /each3101 ASTM C131 Abrasion, Los Angeles Rattler $330.00 /each 3202 ASTM D1188 Core Density Parafilm Coated $55.00 /each3102 ASTM C40 Organic Impurities in Fine Agg $155.00 /each 3203 ASTM D6926 Lab Max Density Marshall Mthd $325.00 /each3110 ASTM D4791 Flat & Elongated Particles $375.00 /each 3204 ASTM D6927 Marshall Stability and Flow $400.00 /each3111 ASTM D5821 Percent Fractured Particles $175.00 /each 3205 ASTM D1561 LTMD Kneading Compactor $325.00 /each3112 ASTM C123 Percent Lightweight Particles $250.00 /each 3207 ASTM D1560 Hveem Stability $295.00 /each3106 ASTM C566 Moisture Content by Drying $45.00 /each 3206 ASTM D1560 Hveem Stability and Density $360.00 /each3105 ASTM C1252 Angularity and Voids in Fine Ag$225.00 /each 3208 ASTM D2041 Maximum Theoretical Density $295.00 /each3107 ASTM C117 Materials Finer than No. 200 $150.00 /each 3211 ASTM D6307 Asphalt Content by Ignition $295.00 /each3109 ASTM C289 Potential Alkali Silica Reaction $550.00 /each 3210 ASTM D6307 Ignition Oven Calibration $375.00 /each3619 ASTM D2419 Sand Equivalent Value $175.00 /each 3212 ASTM D2172 Asphalt Content by Solvents $375.00 /each3114 ASTM C136 Sieve Analysis-Combined Sampl $225.00 /each 3213 ASTM D4125 Asphalt Content, Nuclear Gauge$325.00 /each3115 ASTM C136 Sieve Analysis-Fine Aggregate $195.00 /each 3214 ASTM D5444 Gradation of Extracted Agg $295.00 /each3116 ASTM C136 Sieve Analysis-Coarse Aggregate$195.00 /each 3220 ASTM D244 Emulsion Residue, Evaporation $255.00 /each3113 ASTM C88 Soundness by Sodium Sulfate $440.00 /each 3221 ASTM D244 Emulsion Sieve Analysis $150.00 /each3103 ASTM C127 Specific Gravity of Coarse Agg $195.00 /each 3222 ASTM D3910 Wet Tract Abrasion $150.00 /each3104 ASTM C128 Specific Gravity of Fine Agg $195.00 /each 3224 AASHTO T324 Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test$1,500.00/each3117 ASTM C142 Clay and Friable Particles $250.00 /each 3225 AASHTO T283 Tensile Strength Ratio$1,600.00/each3105 AASHTO T304 Angularity and Voids, Fine Ag$200.00 /each 3202 AASHTO T275 Core Density Paraffin Coated $75.00 /each3104 AASHTO T84 Specific Gravity, Fine Agg $195.00 /each 3227 AASHTO T312/T275 LTMD Gyratory Compacto$475.00 /each3103 AASHTO T85 Specific Gravity, Coarse Agg $195.00 /each 3211 AASHTO T308 Asphalt Content by Ignition $295.00 /each3101 AASHTO T96 Abrasion, Los Angeles Rattler $350.00 /each 3210 AASHTO T308A Ignition Oven Calibration $500.00 /each3114 AASHTO T27 Sieve Analysis, Combined Agg $200.00 /each 3208 AASHTO T209 Theoretical Maximum Density $295.00 /each3115 AASHTO T27 Sieve Analysis, Fine Agg $195.00 /eachMasonry Tests3116 AASHTO T27 Sieve Analysis, Coarse Agg $195.00 /eachTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3619 AASHTO T176 Sand Equivalent $175.00 /each 3401 ASTM C140 Block Compressive Strength $85.00 /set3111 AASHTO T335 Crushed Particles $195.00 /each 3402 ASTM C140 Block Moisture & Absorption $85.00 /setConcrete Tests3403 ASTM C426 Block Linear Shrinkage $345.00 /setTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3404 ASTM C140 Block Unit Wt & Dimensions $255.00 /set6003 Mix Design Review Calculations Only $330.00 /each 3405 ASTM C90 Masonry Block Conformance$605.00 /set3302 ASTM C39 Concrete Cylinder Cured or Teste$50.00 /each 3406 ASTM C67 Brick Compressive Strength $95.00 /set3304 ASTM C39 Cylinder Tested out of Sequence $60.00 /each 3407 ASTM C67 Brick Moisture & Absorption $85.00 /set3303 ASTM C39 Compressive Strength - Core $75.00 /each 3408 ASTM C67 Brick 5 Hour Boil $105.00 /each3305 ASTM C495 Lightweight Concrete Strength $100.00 /each 3409 ASTM C67 Brick Modulus of Rupture $105.00 /each3306 ASTM C78 Flexural Strength - Beam $95.00 /each 3410 ASTM C780 Mortar Cylinder Compression $45.00 /each3311 ASTM C157 Linear Shrinkage (Set of 3) $550.00 /each 3411 ASTM C1019 Grout Prism Compression $45.00 /each3309 ASTM C138 Unit Weight of Concrete $65.00 /each 3412 ASTM C1314 Masonry Core Cmp Str 8"max $85.00 /each3310 ASTM C469 Concrete Modulus of Elasticity $195.00 /each 3413 ASTM C1314 Masonry Core Shear 8"max $95.00 /each3313 ASTM C495 Oven Dry Density Light Wt Conc$195.00 /each 3415 ASTM E519 Assemblage Comp Str 8" Block $105.00 /each3312 ASTM C496 Splitting Tensile Strength $150.00 /each 3416 ASTM E519 Assemblage Comp Str 12" Block $135.00 /each3308 ASTM C1140 Shotcrete Panel Test $350.00 /each 3417 ASTM E519 Assemblage Comp Str 16" Block $155.00 /each3322 AASHTO T336 Coeff of Thermal Expansion$1,200.00/each 3419 ASTM C109 Compression Test 2" Cube $55.00 /each3317ASTM C567 Density of Structural LW Concre$120.00 /each3307ASTM D4832 Compressive Strength CLSM$100.00 /each of

City Council
14 –
132
7/21/2026

LABORATORY TESTSSoils TestsCaltrans TestsTask CodeDescription Cost RateTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3601 ASTM D4318 Plasticity Index of Soils $275.00 /each3114 CT 202 Sieve Analysis-Combined Sample $225.00 /each 3602 ASTM D1883 CA Bearing Ratio of Soils $500.00 /each3115 CT 202 Sieve Analysis-Fine Aggregate $195.00 /each 3603 ASTM D2435 Consolidation $275.00 /each3116 CT 202 Sieve Analysis-Coarse Aggregate $195.00 /each 3604 ASTM D2435 Consolidation, with Time Rate $350.00 /each3601 CT 204 Plasticity Index Atterberg $275.00 /each 3605 ASTM D3080 Direct Shear, Consol & Drained $375.00 /each3155 CT 205 Percentage Crushed Particles $175.00 /each 3606 ASTM D4829 Expansion Index of Soils $250.00 /each3103 CT 206 Specific Gravity of Coarse Aggregate $140.00 /each 3607 ASTM D2166 Unconfined Comp Strength $295.00 /each3104 CT 207 Specific Gravity of Fine Aggregate $195.00 /each 3620 ASTM D2434 Const Head Permeability Test $385.00 /each3158 CT 208 Apparent Specific Gravity of Fines $250.00 /each 3608 ASTM D5333 Hydro-Collapse Potential $225.00 /each3625 CT 209 Specific Gravity of Soils $250.00 /each 3609 ASTM D2050 Tri-Axial Shear Strength $385.00 /each3101 CT 211 Abrasion by Los Angeles Rattler $350.00 /each 3624 ASTM D422 Hydrometer Analysis $295.00 /each3102 CT 213 Organic Impurities in Sand $175.00 /each 3625 ASTM D854 Specific Gravity of Soils $250.00 /each3113 CT 214 Soundness by Sodium Sulfate $450.00 /each 3626 ASTM D4546 Swell Potential $225.00 /each3653 CT 216 California Impact Max Density $275.00 /each 3627 ASTM D4943 Shrinkage Factor by Resin $250.00 /each3654 CT 216 CA Impact Max Dens - Rock Correctio$65.00 /each 3630 ASTM D559 Soil Cement Sample Preparation $175.00 /each3619 CT 217 Sand Equivalent Value $175.00 /each 3631 ASTM D558 Soil Cement Maximum Density $350.00 /each3106 CT 226 Moisture Content by Oven Drying $45.00 /each 3632 ASTM D1633 Compression Test Soil Cement $95.00 /each3162 CT 227 Cleanness Value $250.00 /each 3610 ASTM D2937 In-Place Density, Drive Cylinder $75.00 /each3159 CT 229 Durability Index $375.00 /each 3611 ASTM D2216 Soil Moisture Content by Mass $45.00 /each3160 CT 234 Angularity & Voids Fine Aggregate $275.00 /each 3612 ASTM D698 Maximum Density Std Effort $275.00 /each3154 CT 235 Flat and Elongated Particles $375.00 /each 3613 ASTM D1557 Max Density Optimum Moist $275.00 /each3617 CT 301 Resistance R-Value Stabilometer $450.00 /each 3615 ASTM D2974 Moisture, Ash, Organic Matter $125.00 /each3265 CT 302 Film Stripping $275.00 /each 3616 ASTM D4972 pH of Soils $175.00 /each3253 CT 303 Approximate Bitumen Ratio $275.00 /each 3617 ASTM D2844 R-Value & Expansion Pressures $450.00 /each3254 CT 304/308 LTMD Kneading Compactor $360.00 /each 3619 ASTM D2419 Sand Equivalent $175.00 /each3255 CT 305 Swell of Bituminous Mixtures $385.00 /each 3622 ASTM D422 Sieve Analysis of Soils $225.00 /each3202 CT 308 (A) Core Density Paraffin Coated $75.00 /each 3623 ASTM D1140 Materials Finer than #200 $175.00 /each3201 CT 308 (C) Core Density SSD $75.00 /each 3625 AASHTO T100 Specific Gravity of Soils $250.00 /each3257 CT 308, CT 366 Stability & Density $395.00 /each3208 CT 309 Maximum Theoretical Density $295.00 /each3256 CT 366 Stabilometer Value $325.00 /each3260 CT 370 Moisture Content by Microwave $85.00 /each3264 CT 371 Tensile Strength Ratio$1,600.00/each3213 CT 379 Asphalt content Nuclear Gauge $275.00 /each3262 CT 382 Asphalt Content, Correction Factor $500.00 /each3211 CT 382 Asphalt Content by Ignition Oven $295.00 /each3656 CT 417 Soluble Sulfates $125.00 /each3657 CT 422 Chloride Content $150.00 /each3451 CT 515 Relative Mortar Strength, PCC Sand $660.00 /each3302 CT 521 Concrete Compressive Strength $45.00 /each3352 CT 523 Conc Flexural Strength - Beam $95.00 /each3353 CT 531 Length of Drilled Concrete Cores $50.00 /each3355 CT 534 Water Retention, Liq Curing Cmpnd $470.00 /each3354 CT 550 Surface Abrasion of Concrete $440.00 /each3658 CT 643 Resistivity and pH $175.00 /each of

City Council
14 –
133
7/21/2026

LABORATORY TESTSPrestressing WiresReinforcing Steel BarsTask CodeDescription Cost RateTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3534 ASTM A416 Stress-Strain Analysis $195.00 /each3501 ASTM A370 Rebar Tension up to #8 $45.00 /each 3535 ASTM A416 Tensile Test Only $140.00 /each3502 ASTM A370 Rebar Tension #9 to #11 $55.00 /eachStructural Steel Tests3503 ASTM A370 Rebar Tension #14 $90.00 /eachTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3504 ASTM A370 Rebar Tension #18 $135.00 /each 3536 ASTM A370 Tensile Up to 100K lbs (Each) $55.00 /each3505 ASTM E290 Bend Test Rebar up to #8 $35.00 /each 3537 ASTM A370 Tensile Up to 200K lbs (Each) $65.00 /each3506 ASTM E290 Bend Test Rebar #9 to #11 $45.00 /each 3538 ASTM A370 Tensile Up to 300K lbs (Each) $75.00 /each3507 ASTM E290 Bend Test Rebar #14 $90.00 /each 3539 ASTM A370 Tensile Up to 400K lbs (Each) $125.00 /each3508 ASTM E290 Bend Test Rebar # 18 $135.00 /each 3540 ASTM A370 Tensile Up to 500K lbs (Each) $330.00 /eachMechanical Splices of Reinforcing Steel 3541 ASTM A370 Tensile Stress-Strain Pct Offset $150.00 /eachTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3838 AWS Weld: Macrotech $85.00 /each3509 CT670 Tensile Strength up to #8 $55.00 /each 3839 AWS Weld: Fracture $55.00 /each3510 CT670Tensile Strength #8 - #11 $85.00 /each 3840 AWS Bend Test $55.00 /each3511 CT670Tensile Strength #14 $110.00 /each 3841 ASTM A370 Rockwell Hardness (Each) $85.00 /each3512 CT670Tensile Strength #18 $150.00 /each 3842 Steel Chemical Analysis $150.00 /each3513 CT 52-1-08C Slip Test $150.00 /each 3854 Welding Procedure Review $550.00 /eachOperator Qualifications Reinforcing Steel Bar Splicing High Strength Bolts Task CodeDescription Cost RateTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3514 CT670 Op Qual Ult Butt Splice to #8 $385.00 /each 3843 ASTM F606 Bolt Axial Tensile to 7/8 $45.00 /each3515 CT670 Op Qual Ult Butt Splice #9 - #11 $440.00 /each 3844 ASTM F606 Bolt Wedge Tensile to 7/8 $65.00 /each3516 CT670 Op Qual Ult Butt Splice #14$660.00 /each 3845 ASTM F606 Bolt: Axial 7/8 - 1 1/2$70.00 /each3517 CT670 Op Qual Ult Butt Splice #18 $935.00 /each 3846 ASTM F606 Bolt Wedge Tensile 7/8 to 1 1/2 $85.00 /each3518 CT670 Op Qual Service Splice to #8 $330.00 /each 3847 ASTM F606 Bolt: Proof Load Test up to 7/8 $75.00 /each3519 CT670 Op Qual Service Splice #9 - #11 $385.00 /each 3848 ASTM F606 Bolt: Proof Load Test up to 1 1/2 $95.00 /each3520 CT670 Op Qual Service Splice #14$495.00 /each 3849 ASTM F606 Nut: Proof Load Test up to 7/8 $50.00 /each3521 CT670 Op Qual Service Splice #18 $660.00 /each 3850 ASTM F606 Nut: Proof Load Test up to 1 1/2 $75.00 /eachProduction Lot Reinforcing Steel Bar Splicing Spray Applied Fire Proofing Tests Task CodeDescription Cost RateTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3522 CT670 Production Lot up to #8 (Service) $275.00 /lot 3555 ASTM E605 Spray Applied Fireproofing Den $105.00 /each3523 CT670 Production Lot #9 to #11 (Service) $330.00 /lotResistance Butt Welded Hoops3524 CT670 Production Lot #14 (Service) $440.00 /lotTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3525 CT670 Production Lot #18 (Service) $600.00 /lot 3561 CT670 Production Lot Welded Hoops $250.00 /lot3526 CT670 Production Lot up to #8 (Ultimate) $330.00 /lotHeaded Reinforcing Steel Bars3527 CT670 Production Lot #9 to #11 (Ultimate) $385.00 /lotTask CodeDescription Cost Rate3528 CT670 Production Lot #14 (Ultimate) $605.00 /lot 3530 ASTM A370 Headed Bar Tensile up to #8 $290.00 /lot3529 CT670 Production Lot #18 (Ultimate) $825.00 /lot 3531 ASTM A370 Headed Bar Tensile #9 to #11 $320.00 /lot3532 ASTM A370 Headed Bar Tensile #14 $420.00 /lot3533 ASTM A370 Headed Bar Tensile #18 $550.00 /lot of

City Council
14 –
134
7/21/2026

General Charges TQF requires twenty-four (24) hour prior nocaon for scheduling inspectors and/or technicians. Inspecon charges start at the scheduled show up me at the job site. All inspecon hours will be billed in the following increments:There will be a minimum two (2) hour charge for any TQF employee presence on site. Any me less than four (4) hours of work will be billed as four (4) hours (Half Shi).Four (4) to eight (8) hours will be billed as eight (8) hours (Regular Full Shi). When personnel are required to work in excess of 5 hours without an uninterrupted meal period of 30 minutes, due to project constraints, ½ hour will be charged at double time rates in addition to any applicable hours worked. Rates are valid through June 30, 2026. Rates for personnel will increase by 5% per year on July 1st of each subsequent year. Outside services will be billed at cost plus 25% unless billed directly to and paid for by Client. Requests made by client for management aendance at meengs at the project site will be charged at standard rate.Overtime Charges Work performed in excess of 8 hours per day and/or up to eight (8) hours on Saturdays will be billed at 1.45 mes the unit rate. Work performed on Sunday, recognized holidays, or in excess of eight (8) hours on Saturdays will be billed at 1.8 mes the unit rate. A $500 lab opening fee and 100% surcharge will be applied for laboratory tests performed on a Saturday or Sunday. Rush samples will be billed with a 100% surcharge when same day test results are requested and can be accommodated. Per Diem and Travel Charges An $150.00 charge per day will be applied when our personnel are required to stay overnight at remote locaons. Time will be billed at the unit rate while traveling to a remote locaon or if a locaon requires an overnight stay Mileage for travel outside a 50 mile radius from either the project site or the nearest TQF facility whichever is closest, will be charged at a rate of $0.75 per mile. Night Work A $3.00 per hour surcharge will be added to all personnel rates for work performed during night shis. of

City Council
14 –
135
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
136
7/21/2026

KLEINFELDER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA On-Call Materials Testing & Special Inspection Services (RFP No. 26-059A) Federally Funded Projects Pricing Valid for the Initial One Year Agreement Term KLEINFELDER CONSTRUCTION SERVICES - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE CITY OF SANTA ANA – RFP NO. 26-059A FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS PROFESSIONAL / ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF RATES-NON PLA Project/Task Order Manager ...................................................................................... $ 205 / hr.Construction Scheduler ............................................................................................. $ 170 / hr.Sr. Construction Scheduler. ....................................................................................... $ 265 / hr. Project Controls Specialist ......................................................................................... $ 110 / hr. FIELD STAFF RATES Construction Manager (non PLA)………………………………………………………… Core Field Inspector: Prevailing Wage Group 2.........................................................$ 220/ hr.$ 220 / hr. Non-Core Field Inspector: Prevailing Wage Group 2................................................. $ 227 / hr. Apprentice Field Inspector: Prevailing Wage Group 2 ............................................... $ 137 / hr. Fringe Payment for Core Field Inspectors ................................................................. $ 35.35 / hr. Non-Core Field Inspector Hiring Fee (per employee) ................................................ $ 1500.00 PLA Administration .................................................................................................... $ 500 / mo. Field Vehicle .............................................................................................................. $ 1249 / mo. Personal Vehicle Mileage …………………...……………………………………………. Union Registration Costs………………………………………………………………….. $ IRS Rate$ Actual BASIS OF CHARGES1. Rates presented above are valid for the initial one-year agreement term and are subject to adjustment annually, not to exceed the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. Prevailing wage billing rates will increase by $10.85/hr on July 1, 2027, to compensate for the predetermined increase already scheduled to take place at that time. Following the July 1, 2027 increase, PW rates will follow the annual adjustment supported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2. Union fringe payment will change with any predetermined increase and will be subject to adjustment following publishing of predetermined increase allocation to fringe on July 1st of each year. 3. Travel time will be billed per Public Works Manual Section 4.1.5 requirements. 4. Work conducted outside of standard construction hours (6AM-5PM) will be charged at the overtime rate. 5. A two-hour show-up minimum charge will be made for all field services where work is cancelled less than two hours prior to the requested start time. A four-hour minimum charge will be made for any field services. An eight-hour minimum charge will be made for field services in excess of four hours per day. 6. Overtime and doubletime will be charged per the requirements of the applicable determination. 7. Invoices will be submitted monthly for our services performed during the preceding billing period. Payment schedule is 45 days after the City receives our invoice. 8. Prevailing wage will be paid per determination SC-23-63-2-2026. 9. Field vehicle costs will be charged for both PLA and non PLA positions, at the rates indicated above.

City Council
14 –
137
7/21/2026

EXHIBIT D

City Council
14 –
138
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
139
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
140
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
141
7/21/2026

AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE ON-CALL MATERIAL TESTING AND SPECIAL

INSPECTION SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on this 21st day of July, 2026 by and between Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc. (“Consultant”), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (“City”).

B. Consultant submitted a responsive proposal that was among those selected by the City.

Consultant represents that it is able and willing to provide the services described in the scope of work that was included in RFP No. 26-059A.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual and respective promises, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

City Council
14 –
142
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
143
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
144
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
145
7/21/2026

d. When prevailing rates apply, the Consultant is responsible for verifying compliance with certified payroll requirements. Invoice payment will not be made until the invoice is approved by City. 6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee of the City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer-employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultantperforms the services which are the subject matter of this Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Consultant shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Consultant shall pay all salaries and wages, employer's social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes. 7. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultantshall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk. 8. INSURANCE Insurance requirements attached hereto as Exhibit D. 9. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: (1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Consultant, its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on its behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and (2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable

City Council
14 –
146
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
147
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
148
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
149
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
150
7/21/2026

Consultant, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Consultant. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Consultant or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which is not embodied herein. 19. ASSIGNMENT Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Consultant, Consultant may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City's prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City’s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Consultants retained by City. 20. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice of termination. In such event, Consultant shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Consultantcompensation for all services performed by Consultant prior to receipt of such notice of termination, subject to the following conditions: a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Consultant todeliver to the City all work product(s) completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Consultant consents to the City's use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals of this Agreement.21. WAIVER No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in orgranted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies. 22. JURISDICTION - VENUE This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be

City Council
14 –
151
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
152
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
153
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
154
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
155
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
156
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
157
7/21/2026

schedule; Meeting contract performance requirements; or at a reasonable price. Information about this requirement, along with the list of EPA-designated items, is available at EPA’s Comprehensive Procurement Guidelines webpage: https://www.epa.gov/smm/comprehensive-procurement-guideline-cpg-program. The Contractor also agrees to comply with all other applicable requirements of Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. (2) Domestic Preference for Procurements Recipient should, to the greatest extent practicable, provide a preference for the purchase, acquisition, or use of goods, products, or materials produced in the United States. This includes, but is not limited to iron, aluminum, steel, cement, and other manufactured products. For purposes of this clause: Produced in the United States means, for iron and steel products, that all manufacturing processes, from the initial melting stage through the application of coatings, occurred in the United States. Manufactured products mean items and construction materials composed in whole or in part of non-ferrous metals such as aluminum; plastics and polymer-based products such as polyvinyl chloride pipe; aggregates such as concrete; glass, including optical fiber; and lumber. w. Termination for Cause and Convenience – Should recipient fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this agreement within the time specified by this Agreement, the CITY reserves the right to terminate the Agreement, reserving all rights under state and federal law. x. Contractual/Legal Remedies for Breach of Contract – Should recipient fail for any reason to comply with the contractual obligations of this Agreement and/or willfully, knowingly or negligently breach any term, condition or requirement of the agreement, City may impose sanctions including but not limited to damages (liquidated damages and or penalties) and /or any other remedy available pursuant to the Agreement of the laws then in effect. 25. NOTICE Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided in this Section, to the following persons: To City:

City Council
14 –
158
7/21/2026

City ClerkCity of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-30)P.O. Box 1988 Santa Ana, CA 92702-1988With courtesy copies to:Executive Director, Public Works Agency City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza (M-21)P.O. Box 1988Santa Ana, California 92702To Consultant: Bridget ShermanSenior Project Executive Koury Engineering & Testing, Inc.5711 Schaefer Avenue Chino, CA 91710 A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three (3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty-four (24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these time frames, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded. 23. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONSa. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms of this Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn. b. All Exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.

City Council
14 –
159
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
160
7/21/2026

EXHIBIT A

City Council
14 –
161
7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

EXHIBIT 1 SCOPE OF SERVICES

City Council
14 –
162
7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

City Council
14 –
163
7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

City Council
14 –
164
7/21/2026

CITY OF SANTA ANA

City Council
14 –
165
7/21/2026

EXHIBIT B

City Council
14 –
166
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
167
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
168
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
169
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
170
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
171
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
172
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
173
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
174
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
175
7/21/2026

EXHIBIT C

City Council
14 –
176
7/21/2026

City Council
14 –
177
7/21/2026

Page 1 of 4 ends

Santa Ana City CouncilJuly 21, 2026

Santa Ana City Council
July 21, 2026