ten) of the scheduled regular meetings of the Planning Commission during this reporting period; however, these absences do not yet meet the threshold of failing to attend at least one-half of the regular meetings within a calendar year.
Only two of the six boards/commissions have full membership, as follows:
- Planning Commission (includes one holdover appointee) - Police Oversight Commission (includes one holdover appointee) The other four boards/commissions have at least one vacancy, as follows:
- Community Development Commission: 2 vacancies (Ward 2, Section 8 Tenant Seat)
- Measure X Oversight Committee: 1 vacancy (Ward 2)
- Personnel Board: 1 vacancy (Ward 1) and 1 holdover appointee (Ward 6) - Rental Housing Board: 2 vacancies (Ward Nos. 4 and 5) The Rental Housing Board only had two or three appointed members for this reporting period due to vacancies and resignations, leaving them unable to have quorum to meet and conduct business. Two subsequent appointments were made in July and August allowing the Board to hold meetings each month since that time.
As part of the budget adoption process for Fiscal Year 2026/27, City Council approved the dissolution of five boards and commissions. As those boards and commissions were officially dissolved upon the adoption of Ordinance No. NS-3097, they are not included in this biannual report.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Biannual Attendance Reports
2. Roster of Current Vacancies and Expired Terms
Submitted By: Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 5 – 2 9/15/2026
City Council 5 – 3 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
BIANNUAL ATTENDANCE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
(January 2026 - July 2026)
Personnel Board
BOARD/COMMISSION NAME:
I I JANUARY FEBRUARY .MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE
MEMBER NAME WARD
Meeting Dates Meeting Dates Meeting Dates Meeting Dates Meeting Dates Meeting Dates 1/8 1/22 2/12 2/26 3/12 3/26 4/9 4/23 5/14 5/27 5/28 6/11 6/15 6/16 Acevedo,Joseph 5 X C C E C C C C C X X C C C
Anguiano, Adrian City- X I C I I C I X I I C I C I I c I C I I C I X I X I C I C I C Wide
Ballinas, Berenice I
4 I X I C I I C I X I I C I C I I C I C I I C I X I X I C I C I C Crockett, David 3 X C C X C C C C C X X C C C
Hernandez-Castillo, 2 X C C E C C C C C X X C C C
Gabriela
Rivera, Angie 6 X C C X c
_j C
I I C I C I I C
I X I XI C I C
I C
VACANT 1
ATTENDANCE KEY: X= Attended E = Excused Absence U = Unexcused Absence C = Cancelled Meeting COMMENTS:
City Council 5 – 5 Page I 9/15/2026 of2
City Council 5 – 6 9/15/2026
City Council 5 – 7 9/15/2026
City Council 5 – 8 9/15/2026
City Council 5 – 9 9/15/2026
Roster of Current Vacancies and Expired Terms
CITY OF SANTA ANA POSTED ON:
AT: DO NOT REMOVE
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SEC. 54974.
SERVING WARD BOARD APPOINTED
BY
LAST NAME FIRST NAME APPT REAPPT EXPIRE RESIDING
WARD
POSITION
1 Personnel Board Phan VACANT 12/12/2028 NA
2 Santa Ana 2018 Measure X Citizen Oversight Committee
Vazquez VACANT 12/8/2026 NA
Community Development Commission
Vazquez VACANT 12/8/2026 NA
4 Rental Housing Board Bacerra VACANT 12/31/2027 N/A
5 Police Oversight Commission
Hernandez Mejia Amalia 06/06/2023 12/10/2024 4 NA
Rental Housing Board Hernandez VACANT 12/31/2027 N/A
Wednesday, August 5, 2026 Page 1 of 2
DISCLOSURE: The report information is subject to change. If City Council you need the most current information on file, please contact the Clerk of the Council Office at 714 647-6520. 5 – 10 9/15/2026
SERVING WARD BOARD APPOINTED
BY
LAST NAME FIRST NAME APPT REAPPT EXPIRE RESIDING
WARD
POSITION
Planning Commission Hernandez Woo Alan 03/16/2021 12/10/2024 3 NA 6 Personnel Board Penaloza Rivera Angie 01/15/2019 12/13/2022 4 NA NA
Community Development Commission
Sec. 8
Tenant
VACANT 12/31/2026 Sec. 8 Tenant
Workforce Development Board
Private
Sector
VACANT 5/31/2026 NA Private Sector
Workforce Development Board
Private
Sector
VACANT 5/31/2026 Private Sector
Workforce Development Board
Community
Based
VACANT 5/31/2026 Community
Based
Workforce Development Board
Private
Sector
VACANT 5/31/2026 NA Private Sector
Wednesday, August 5, 2026 Page 2 of 2
DISCLOSURE: The report information is subject to change. If City Council you need the most current information on file, please contact the Clerk of the Council Office at 714 647-6520. 5 – 11 9/15/2026 City Clerk’s Office
www.santa-ana.gov/cityclerk
Item # 6
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Local Agency Biennial Notice re. Conflict of Interest Code
AGENDA TITLE
2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice Regarding Conflict of Interest Code
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and file the Fair Political Practices Commission 2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice advising that the City's Conflict of Interest Code is currently under review.
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
At the June 16, 2026 City Council meeting, City Council directed the City Manager and City Clerk to have the City’s Conflict of Interest Code reviewed. The Political Reform Act requires local agencies to file a biennial notice with the code reviewing body, the City Council, no later than October 1, 2026, advising whether any amendments to the City’s Conflict of Interest Code are necessary.
The code is currently under review to determine whether any amendments are necessary to include new positions, revise titles of existing positions, delete titles of positions that have been abolished and/or positions that no longer make or participate in the making of government decisions, and/or to revise disclosure categories. Following the receipt and filing of the 2026 Biennial Notice, staff will provide sufficient notice of any required revisions and present the revised code for City Council consideration and approval no later than December 31, 2026.
The City adopted its first Conflict of Interest Code in 1976, with the various offices, agencies, and departments of the City of Santa Ana maintaining Conflict of Interest Codes pursuant to the Political Reform Act since that time, with the most recent amendment completed in November 2024.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
City Council 6 – 1 9/15/2026
Local Agency Biennial Notice re. Conflict of Interest Code September 15, 2026
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
EXHIBIT(S)
1. 2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice
Submitted By: Jennifer L. Hall, City Clerk
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 6 – 2 9/15/2026
www.fppc.ca.gov
FPPC Advice: [email protected] (866.275.3772)
2026 Local Agency Biennial Notice
Name of Agency:
Mailing Address:
Contact Person: Phone No.
Email: Alternate Email:
Accurate disclosure is essential to monitor whether officials have conflicts of interest and to help ensure public trust in government. The biennial review examines current programs to ensure that the agency’s code includes disclosure by those agency officials who make or participate in making governmental decisions.
This agency has reviewed its conflict of interest code and has determined that (check one BOX):
An amendment is required. The following amendments are necessary:
(Check all that apply.)
Include new positions
Revise disclosure categories
Revise the titles of existing positions
Delete titles of positions that have been abolished and/or positions that no longer make or participate in making governmental decisions
Other (describe)
The code is currently under review by the code reviewing body.
No amendment is required. (If your code is over five years old, amendments may be necessary.)
Verification (to be completed if no amendment is required) This agency’s code accurately designates all positions that make or participate in the making of governmental decisions. The disclosure assigned to those positions accurately requires that all investments, business positions, interests in real property, and sources of income that may foreseeably be affected materially by the decisions made by those holding designated positions are reported. The code includes all other provisions required by Government Code Section 87302.
__________________________________________ _________________________ Signature of Chief Executive Officer Date
All agencies must complete and return this notice regardless of how recently your code was approved or amended. Please return this notice no later than October 1, 2026, or by the date specified by your agency, if earlier, to:
(PLACE RETURN ADDRESS OF CODE REVIEWING BODY HERE)
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN THIS FORM TO THE FPPC.
City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza, M-30, Santa Ana, CA 92702 Jennifer L. Hall 714-647-6520 [email protected] [email protected] ✔ City Council 6 – 3 9/15/2026
Finance and Management Services
www.santa-ana.gov/finance
Item # 7
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Quarterly Report of Investments as of June 30, 2026
AGENDA TITLE
Receive and File Quarterly Report of Investments as of June 30, 2026
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Receive and file.
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
In accordance with the City’s Statement of Investment Policy, the Finance and Management Services Agency (FMSA) shall provide the City Council and City Manager an Investment Report (Report) containing detailed information on all cash and security investments of the City. The City Manager and City Council receive the reports monthly, within 45 days following month-end, in compliance with Government Code section 53646.
Quarterly reports appear on regular City Council public meeting agendas for formal approval.
Each month, staff performs an expenditure analysis to ensure the City can meet its budgeted expenditures for the next six months. As of June 30, 2026, this analysis confirms that the City has adequate cash reserves to meet its obligations for the next six months. All information provided complies with state law and the City of Santa Ana July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026 Statement of Investment Policy.
The Quarterly Investment Report (Exhibit 1) attached accurately represents all pooled investments held for the City as of June 30, 2026.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
This action has no environmental impact.
FISCAL IMPACT
This action has no fiscal impact.
City Council 7 – 1 9/15/2026
Quarterly Report of Investments
September 15, 2026
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Investment Report
Submitted By: Alexander Trinidad, Executive Director, Finance and Management Services
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 7 – 2 9/15/2026
Investment
Report
City of Santa Ana
As of June 30, 2026
Exhibit 1
City Council 7 – 3 9/15/2026
Your Portfolio Principal Cost
LAIF/CLASS $128,980,435.51
Cash $25,018,531.57
BNY Custody Account $293,890,153.71
Total Portfolio $447,889,120.79
Restricted Cash $78,481,395.25
Your Portfolio
Weighted Average Maturity 1.89 years
Weighted Average Yield 3.47%
Your Asset Allocation
Your Maturity Distribution
153,998,967
78,540,420
44,783,173 42,852,140
75,930,493
51,783,929
34.38% 17.54% 10.00% 9.57% 16.95% 11.56%
-
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
180,000,000
Overnight Funds 0-1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years 4-5 years 14%
1%
9%
17%
3% 14%
5%
29%
6%2% US Government Agencies
Negotiable CDs
US Treasuries
Corporate Bonds
Municipal Bonds
Mortgage Backed Securities
Asset Backed Securities
LAIF/CLASS
Cash
Commercial Paper
Current Portfolio
City of Santa Ana portfolio as of 6/30/2026
YIELD AND INTEREST INCOME INFORMATION IS ANNUALIZED. ALL YIELD INFORMATION IS SHOWN GROSS OF ANY ADVISORY AND CUSTODY FEES AND IS BASED ON YIELD TO MATURITY AT COST.
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT A GUARANTEE OF FUTURE RESULTS.
City Council 7 – 4 9/15/2026
Portfolio Summary
CURRENT
MONTH
Beginning 300,279,567.14
Contributions/Withdrawals (7,700,000.00)
Management Fees 0.00
Custodian Fees 0.00
Realized Gains Losses 169,855.00
Purchased Interest (16,539.17)
Interest Received 1,157,270.74
ENDING 293,890,153.71
3.64 Weighted Average Yield to Maturity
2.36 Weighted Average Maturity (Years)
2.02 Portfolio Effective Duration (Years)
2.20 Weighted Average Life (Years)
AA
Average Credit Rating
Custodial Reconciliation
Sector Allocation
• 1 Corporate Bonds 25.61%
• 1 U.S. Agencies 21.71%
• 1 MBS 21.11%
• 1 U.S. Treasuries 13.36%
• 1 Asset-Backed Securities 8.39%
• 1 Municipal Bonds 5.07%
• 1 Commercial Paper 3.05%
• 1 Negotiable CD's 1.42%
• 1 Money Market Funds 0.28%
Maturity Distribution
Projected Monthly Income Schedule
CITY OF SANTA ANA
JUNE 30, 2026
City Council 7 – 5 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DATE
SETTLE DATE PAR VALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOTAL COST
YIELD TO
MATURITY
MATURITY
DATE
DAYS TO
MATURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET VALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS BOOK
VALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RATING
CITY OF SANTA
ANA
BANK DEPOSITS
00402CASH JPMorgan ChaseGENERAL 9500
06/30/2026
06/30/2026 22,051,636.28 22,051,636.280.00 22,051,636.28 0.00 1 1.0022,051,636.28
0.00 22,051,636.28 4.93 NANA
00396CASH JPMorgan ChaseWORKERS COMP 37983
06/30/2026
06/30/2026 1,401,398.37 1,401,398.370.00 1,401,398.37 0.00 1 1.001,401,398.37
0.00 1,401,398.37 0.31 NANA
00394CASH CITY OF SANTA ANAPETTY CASH
06/30/2026
06/30/2026 79,525.00 79,525.000.00 79,525.00 0.00 1 1.00 79,525.00
0.00 79,525.00 0.02 NANA
00397CASH
JPMorgan ChaseGENERAL LIABILITY
38130
06/30/2026
06/30/2026 1,485,971.92 1,485,971.920.00 1,485,971.92 0.00 1 1.001,485,971.92
0.00 1,485,971.92 0.33 NANA
BANK DEPOSITS
TOTAL 25,018,531.57 25,018,531.570.00 25,018,531.57 0.00 1 1.0025,018,531.57
0.00 25,018,531.57 5.60 NA
LGIP
CACLASS CALIFORNIA CLASS 06/30/2026
06/30/2026 48,591,467.43 48,591,467.430.00 48,591,467.43 3.72 1 1.0048,591,467.43
0.00 48,591,467.43 10.87 NA
00393CASH Local Agency Investment
Fund-LAIF ARPA
06/30/2026
06/30/2026 6,140,058.35 6,140,058.350.00 6,140,058.35 3.81 1 1.006,140,058.35
0.00 6,140,058.35 1.37 NA
00391CASH Local Agency Investment
Fund-LAIFCITY
06/30/2026
06/30/2026 74,248,909.73 74,248,909.730.00 74,248,909.73 3.81 1 1.0074,248,909.73
0.00 74,248,909.73 16.61 NA
LGIP TOTAL 128,980,435.51 128,980,435.51
0.00 128,980,435.51 3.78 1 1.00128,980,435.51
0.00 128,980,435.51 28.86 NA
MONEY MARKET
FUNDS
261941108 BNY DREYFUS TRS
SEC;INST
06/30/2026
06/30/2026 822,109.67 822,109.67
0.00 822,109.67 3.53 1 1.00
822,109.67
0.00 822,109.67 0.18 AaaAAA
MONEY MARKET
FUNDS TOTAL 822,109.67 822,109.670.00 822,109.67 3.53 1 1.00822,109.67
0.00 822,109.67 0.18 AAA
COMMERCIAL
PAPER
63873KGM3 NATIXIS NY 07/21/26 11/19/2025
11/20/2025 5,050,000.00 4,917,399.630.00 4,917,399.63 3.99 07/21/2026 21 99.785,039,086.39 121,686.76
4,917,399.63 1.13 P-1A-1
62479MPS6 MUFG BANK NY 02/26/27 06/03/2026
06/04/2026 4,000,000.00 3,883,113.330.00 3,883,113.33 4.06 02/26/2027 241 97.373,894,933.33 11,820.00
3,883,113.33 0.87 P-1A-1
COMMERCIAL
PAPER TOTAL 9,050,000.00 8,800,512.960.00 8,800,512.96 4.02 117 98.738,934,019.72 133,506.76
8,800,512.96 2.00 A-1
U.S. TREASURIES
91282CEW7 US TREASURY 3.250
06/30/27
03/30/2026
03/31/2026 6,500,000.00 6,454,296.880.00 6,454,296.88 3.83 06/30/2027 365 99.166,445,156.25 (9,140.63)
6,454,296.88 1.44 Aa1AA+
91282CNH0 US TREASURY 3.875
06/15/28
12/19/2025
12/22/2025 4,000,000.00 4,035,156.250.00 4,035,156.25 3.50 06/15/2028 716 99.463,978,437.52 (56,718.73)
4,035,156.25 0.89 Aa1AA+
Position Statement
City Council 7 – 6 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DATE
SETTLE DATE PAR VALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOTAL COST
YIELD TO
MATURITY
MATURITY
DATE
DAYS TO
MATURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET VALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS BOOK
VALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RATING
91282CNM9 US TREASURY 3.875
07/15/28
12/19/2025
12/22/2025 5,000,000.00 5,043,945.310.00 5,043,945.31 3.51 07/15/2028 746 99.434,971,484.40 (72,460.91)
5,043,945.31 1.11 Aa1AA+
91282CNY3 US TREASURY 3.375
09/15/28
12/19/2025
12/22/2025 5,000,000.00 4,980,859.380.00 4,980,859.38 3.52 09/15/2028 808 98.344,917,187.50 (63,671.88)
4,980,859.38 1.10 Aa1AA+
91282CLN9 US TREASURY 3.500
09/30/29
01/12/2026
01/13/2026 4,000,000.00 3,976,250.000.00 3,976,250.00 3.67 09/30/2029 1,188 97.983,919,062.52 (57,187.48)
3,976,250.00 0.88 Aa1AA+
91282CMA6 US TREASURY 4.125
11/30/29
12/18/2024
12/19/2024 2,150,000.00 2,139,501.95
0.00 2,139,501.95 4.24 11/30/2029 1,249 99.842,146,640.63 7,138.68
2,139,501.95 0.48 Aa1AA+
91282CMZ1 US TREASURY 3.875
04/30/30
05/22/2025
05/23/2025 3,450,000.00 3,413,613.280.00 3,413,613.28 4.11 04/30/2030 1,400 98.913,412,535.17 (1,078.11)
3,413,613.28 0.76 Aa1
AA+
91282CNK3 US TREASURY 3.875
06/30/30
08/25/2025
08/26/2025 6,000,000.00 6,022,500.000.00 6,022,500.00 3.79 06/30/2030 1,461 98.845,930,625.00 (91,875.00)
6,022,500.00 1.33 Aa1AA+
91282CPR6 US TREASURY 3.625
12/31/30
01/12/2026
01/13/2026 3,500,000.00 3,478,671.880.00 3,478,671.88 3.76 12/31/2030 1,645 97.653,417,695.33 (60,976.55)
3,478,671.88 0.76 Aa1AA+
U.S. TREASURIES
TOTAL 39,600,000.00 39,544,794.930.00 39,544,794.93 3.74 1,004 98.8439,138,824.32 (405,970.61)
39,544,794.93 8.76 AA+
U.S. AGENCIES
3133EM2C5 FED FARM CR BNKS
0.710 08/10/26 '25
08/10/2021
08/10/2021 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.000.00 6,000,000.00 0.71 08/10/2026 41 99.625,977,080.00 (22,920.00)
6,000,000.00 1.34 Aa1
AA+
3130ANQ78 FHLBANKS 0.900
08/27/26 '26
08/27/2021
08/27/2021 6,000,000.00 6,000,000.000.00 6,000,000.00 0.90 08/27/2026 58 99.545,972,100.00 (27,900.00)
6,000,000.00 1.34 Aa1AA+
3130APB79 FHLBANKS 1.000
09/30/26 '26
09/30/2021
09/30/2021 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.000.00 5,000,000.00 1.00 09/30/2026 92 99.264,962,950.00 (37,050.00)
5,000,000.00 1.11 Aa1AA+
3130AP3E3 FHLBANKS 0.820
09/30/26
09/30/2021
09/30/2021 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.000.00 5,000,000.00 0.82 09/30/2026 92 99.244,962,050.00 (37,950.00)
5,000,000.00 1.11 Aa1AA+
3130APQB4 FHLBANKS 1.500
11/23/26 '26
11/23/2021
11/23/2021 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.000.00 5,000,000.00 1.50 11/23/2026 146 98.904,944,900.00 (55,100.00)
5,000,000.00 1.11 Aa1AA+
3130APVC6 FHLBANKS 1.375 12/01/26
'26
12/14/2021
12/14/2021 5,000,000.00 4,997,500.000.00 4,997,500.00 1.39 12/01/2026 154 98.794,939,350.00 (58,150.00)
4,997,500.00 1.11 Aa1AA+
3130AQAB9 FHLBANKS 1.625
12/30/26 '26
12/30/2021
12/30/2021 3,750,000.00 3,750,000.000.00 3,750,000.00 1.63 12/30/2026 183 98.773,703,837.50 (46,162.50)
3,750,000.00 0.83 Aa1AA+
3130AQNR0 FHLBANKS 1.750 01/27/27
'26
01/27/2022
01/27/2022 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.00 3,000,000.00 1.75 01/27/2027 211 98.562,956,680.00 (43,320.00)
3,000,000.00 0.66 Aa1AA+
3130AQKM4 FHLBANKS 1.750
01/28/27 '26
01/28/2022
01/28/2022 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.000.00 1,500,000.00 1.75 01/28/2027 212 98.55 1,478,220.00
(21,780.00)
1,500,000.00 0.33 Aa1
AA+
3130AQSA2 FHLBANKS 1.830
02/10/27 '26
02/10/2022
02/10/2022 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.000.00 5,000,000.00 1.83 02/10/2027 225 98.58 4,929,100.00
(70,900.00)
5,000,000.00 1.10 Aa1
AA+
3133ENPB0 FED FARM CR BNKS 2.180
02/16/27 '25
02/16/2022
02/16/2022 3,500,000.00 3,500,000.00
0.00 3,500,000.00 2.18 02/16/2027 231 98.67
3,453,485.00
(46,515.00)
3,500,000.00 0.77 Aa1
AA+
3130AQYA5 FHLBANKS 2.250
02/24/27 '26
02/28/2022
02/28/2022 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.000.00 1,500,000.00 2.25 02/24/2027 239 98.751,481,250.00 (18,750.00)
1,500,000.00 0.33 Aa1AA+
3130ARC82 FHLBANKS 2.100
03/29/27
03/29/2022
03/29/2022 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.00 3,000,000.00 2.10 03/29/2027 272 98.512,955,240.00 (44,760.00)
3,000,000.00 0.66 Aa1AA+
3133ENUH1 FED FARM CR BNKS
3.330 04/12/27 '25
04/12/2022
04/12/2022 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.000.00 2,000,000.00 3.33 04/12/2027 286 99.291,985,700.00 (14,300.00)
2,000,000.00 0.44 Aa1AA+
Position Statement
City Council 7 – 7 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DATE
SETTLE DATE PAR VALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOTAL COST
YIELD TO
MATURITY
MATURITY
DATE
DAYS TO
MATURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET VALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS BOOK
VALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RATING
3133ENVV9 FED FARM CR BNKS
3.630 05/03/27 '25
05/03/2022
05/03/2022 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.000.00 3,000,000.00 3.63 05/03/2027 307 99.552,986,500.00 (13,500.00)
3,000,000.00 0.67 Aa1AA+
880591FE7 TVA 3.875 08/01/30 08/14/2025
08/15/2025 6,000,000.00 5,990,280.000.00 5,990,280.00 3.91 08/01/2030 1,493 98.665,919,660.00 (70,620.00)
5,990,280.00 1.32 Aa1AA+
U.S. AGENCIES
TOTAL 64,250,000.00 64,237,780.000.00 64,237,780.00 1.78 283 99.0063,608,102.50 (629,677.50)
64,237,780.00 14.23 AA+
MBS
3132XFMR6 FH WN1267 07/31/2024
08/05/2024 5,500,000.00 5,463,261.72
0.00 5,463,261.72 4.51 08/01/2028 763 99.575,476,438.11 13,176.39
5,463,261.72 1.23 Aa1AA+
3132XGZG4 FH WN2542 05/29/2025
06/03/2025 1,700,000.00 1,703,718.750.00 1,703,718.75 4.59 12/01/2028 885 100.051,700,828.31 (2,890.44)
1,703,718.75 0.38 Aa1AA+
3132XKTM9 FH WN5055 05/14/2025
05/19/2025 3,865,000.00 3,789,360.740.00 3,789,360.74 4.60 07/01/2029 1,097 98.613,811,136.82 21,776.08
3,789,360.74 0.85 Aa1AA+
3137HFF59 FHMS K-527 A2 4.618
07/25/2029
08/13/2024
08/22/2024 2,400,000.00 2,441,937.600.00 2,441,937.60 4.16 07/25/2029 1,121 100.292,406,970.20 (34,967.40)
2,441,937.60 0.54 Aa1AA+
3140NWBC8 FN BZ1834 10/07/2024
10/10/2024 6,000,000.00 5,941,406.250.00 5,941,406.25 4.30 09/01/2029 1,159 98.785,927,027.40 (14,378.85)
5,941,406.25 1.33 Aa1AA+
3132XKVZ7 FH WN5131 08/13/2025
08/18/2025 3,044,246.44 3,069,932.270.00 3,069,932.27 4.25 10/01/2029 1,189 99.843,039,431.17 (30,501.10)
3,069,932.27 0.68 Aa1AA+
3132XKWE3 FH WN5144 01/24/2025
01/29/2025 3,725,000.00 3,608,593.750.00 3,608,593.75 4.67 10/01/2029 1,189 98.513,669,356.81 60,763.06
3,608,593.75 0.82 Aa1
AA+
3132XKXN2 FH WN5184 08/13/2025
08/18/2025 5,000,000.00 5,031,835.940.00 5,031,835.94 4.33 11/01/2029 1,220 99.714,985,673.25 (46,162.69)
5,031,835.94 1.12 Aa1AA+
3137HJ5Y9 FHMS K-534 A2 4.7
11/25/2029
01/24/2025
01/30/2025 2,000,000.00 1,993,510.00
0.00 1,993,510.00 4.70 11/25/2029 1,244 100.552,010,937.94 17,427.94
1,993,510.00 0.45 Aa1AA+
3140NW7A7 FN BZ2688 12/18/2024
12/27/2024 3,000,000.00 2,981,250.000.00 2,981,250.00 4.65 12/01/2029 1,250 100.183,005,426.07 24,176.07
2,981,250.00 0.67 Aa1AA+
3137HN6B9 FHMS K-547 A2 4.421
05/25/2030
09/23/2025
09/29/2025 1,750,000.00 1,776,195.750.00 1,776,195.75 4.00 05/25/2030 1,425 101.50 1,776,195.75
0.00 1,776,195.75 0.40 Aa1AA+
3140Q0L91 FN BZ4851 01/12/2026
01/15/2026 5,000,000.00 4,995,312.500.00 4,995,312.50 4.02 09/01/2030 1,524 98.134,906,571.55 (88,740.95)
4,995,312.50 1.10 Aa1AA+
3140Q0SB9 FN BZ5013 11/17/2025
11/20/2025 5,100,000.00 5,131,277.340.00 5,131,277.34 4.02 09/01/2030 1,524 98.945,045,931.79 (85,345.55)
5,131,277.34 1.13 Aa1AA+
3140Q1AV2 FN BZ5419 06/03/2026
06/08/2026 6,585,000.00 6,502,687.505,339.34 6,508,026.84 4.47 11/01/2030 1,585 98.63 6,494,467.05
(8,220.45)
6,502,687.50 1.45 Aa1
AA+
3140Q16V7 FN BZ6283 01/27/2026
01/30/2026 3,500,000.00 3,518,730.470.00 3,518,730.47 4.12 01/01/2031 1,646 98.86 3,460,020.41
(58,710.06)
3,518,730.47 0.77 Aa1
AA+
35802GAA8 FRESB 2026-SB127 A5F
4.39 02/25/2031
06/17/2026
06/23/2026 4,174,482.81 4,147,413.90
11,199.83 4,158,613.73 4.47 02/25/2031 1,701 99.17
4,139,937.97
(7,475.93)
4,147,413.90 0.93 NA
NA
MBS TOTAL 62,343,729.25 62,096,424.48
16,539.17 62,112,963.65 4.36 1,301 99.2261,856,350.59
(240,073.89)
62,096,424.48 13.84 AA+
NEGOTIABLE CD'S
Position Statement
City Council 7 – 8 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DATE
SETTLE DATE PAR VALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOTAL COST
YIELD TO
MATURITY
MATURITY
DATE
DAYS TO
MATURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET VALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS BOOK
VALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RATING
15721UET2
CFBank National
Association 0.85
07/10/2026
11/10/2021
11/10/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 0.85 07/10/2026 10 99.90247,752.37 (247.63)
248,000.00 0.06 NANA
292079AR1 Empire State Bank 0.9
07/13/2026
11/12/2021
11/12/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 0.90 07/13/2026 13 99.87247,681.88 (318.12)
248,000.00 0.06 NANA
87165FD76 SYNCHRONY BANK 1.100
11/05/26
11/05/2021
11/05/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 1.10 11/05/2026 128 98.73244,846.29 (3,153.71)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
549104ZS9 LUANA SAVINGS 0.600
11/05/26
11/05/2021
11/05/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 0.60 11/05/2026 128 98.56244,429.57 (3,570.43)
248,000.00 0.05 NA
NA
59013KPN0 MERRICK BANK 1.100
11/09/26
11/09/2021
11/09/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 1.10 11/09/2026 132 98.68244,724.71 (3,275.29)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
70962LAV4 PENTAGON FEDERA
1.000 11/10/26
11/10/2021
11/10/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 1.00 11/10/2026 133 98.63 244,612.44
(3,387.56)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
89235MMB4 TOYOTA FINL SVGS 1.100
11/12/26
11/12/2021
11/12/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 1.10 11/12/2026 135 98.66244,670.94 (3,329.06)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
73319FBJ7 POPPY BNK 0.800
11/17/26
11/17/2021
11/17/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 0.80 11/17/2026 140 98.49244,253.02 (3,746.98)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
30781JAW0 FARMERS BK 0.850
11/19/26
11/19/2021
11/19/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 0.85 11/19/2026 142 98.49244,246.87 (3,753.13)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
856285YQ8 STATE BANK NY 1.150
11/30/26
11/29/2021
11/29/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 1.15 11/30/2026 153 98.83 245,103.36
(2,896.64)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
58404DMQ1 MEDALLION BANK 1.250
12/21/26
12/20/2021
12/20/2021 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 1.25 12/21/2026 174 98.34 243,885.93
(4,114.07)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
14042TEP8 CAPITL ONE NA 2.000
03/16/27
03/16/2022
03/16/2022 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 2.00 03/16/2027 259 98.56244,428.80 (3,571.20)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
02589ABT8 AM EX BK 2.000 03/16/27 03/16/2022
03/16/2022 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 2.00 03/16/2027 259 98.56244,428.80 (3,571.20)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
07371AH22 MONET BANK 2.250
03/24/27
03/30/2022
03/30/2022 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/24/2027 267 98.69244,753.68 (3,246.32)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
07371CT25 BEAL BNK US 2.250
03/24/27
03/30/2022
03/30/2022 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/24/2027 267 98.20243,535.70 (4,464.30)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
61773TCX9 MSBNA 2.250 03/30/27
'26
03/31/2022
03/31/2022 248,000.00 248,000.000.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/30/2027 273 98.18243,480.70 (4,519.30)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
61768U3U9 MORGAN PVT BNK 2.250
03/30/27 '26
03/31/2022
03/31/2022 248,000.00 248,000.00
0.00 248,000.00 2.25 03/30/2027 273 98.18
243,480.70
(4,519.30)
248,000.00 0.05 NANA
NEGOTIABLE CD'S
TOTAL 4,216,000.00 4,216,000.000.00 4,216,000.00 1.39 169 98.684,160,315.74 (55,684.26)
4,216,000.00 0.93 NA
MUNICIPAL
BONDS
13063DC48 CALIFORNIA STATE 1.700
02/01/28
07/25/2024
07/26/2024 3,120,000.00 2,853,302.400.00 2,853,302.40 4.35 02/01/2028 581 96.223,002,188.80 148,886.40
2,853,302.40 0.67 Aa2AA79773KPC2 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF
CITY & 4.670 06/15/28
01/15/2025
01/30/2025 1,335,000.00 1,342,876.500.00 1,342,876.50 4.48 06/15/2028 716 100.561,342,496.03 (380.48)
1,342,876.50 0.30 Aa1AA+
283062DS3 EL DORADO CALIF IRR
DIST RE 2.055 03/01/29
07/30/2024
07/31/2024 2,500,000.00 2,260,300.000.00 2,260,300.00 4.39 03/01/2029 975 94.052,351,327.50 91,027.50
2,260,300.00 0.53 Aa3AAPosition Statement
City Council 7 – 9 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DATE
SETTLE DATE PAR VALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOTAL COST
YIELD TO
MATURITY
MATURITY
DATE
DAYS TO
MATURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET VALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS BOOK
VALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RATING
79773KPD0 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF
CITY & 4.800 06/15/29
01/15/2025
01/30/2025 4,015,000.00 4,045,875.350.00 4,045,875.35 4.61 06/15/2029 1,081 101.024,056,021.26 10,145.91
4,045,875.35 0.91 Aa1AA+
13063EGT7 CALIFORNIA STATE
4.500 08/01/29
11/05/2024
11/06/2024 4,075,000.00 4,092,685.500.00 4,092,685.50 4.40 08/01/2029 1,128 100.474,094,348.10 1,662.60
4,092,685.50 0.92 Aa2AAMUNICIPAL
BONDS TOTAL 15,045,000.00 14,595,039.750.00 14,595,039.75 4.45 943 98.7614,846,381.68 251,341.93
14,595,039.75 3.32 AA
ASSET-BACKED
SECURITIES
437918AC9 HONDO-241-A3 11/04/2024
11/05/2024 3,229,595.43 3,266,559.15
0.00 3,266,559.15 4.79 08/15/2028 777 100.443,243,906.77 (22,652.38)
3,266,559.15 0.73 AaaAAA
02589BAE0 AXCMT-243-A 03/27/2026
03/30/2026 5,936,000.00 5,978,665.000.00 5,978,665.00 4.08 07/16/2029 380 100.445,962,160.37 (16,504.63)
5,978,665.00 1.33 NAAAA
14041NGE5 COMET-241-A 11/12/2024
11/13/2024 5,000,000.00 4,911,718.750.00 4,911,718.75 4.32 09/17/2029 1,175 99.604,979,846.95 68,128.20
4,911,718.75 1.11 NAAAA
43814VAC1 HONDO-251-A3 02/04/2025
02/11/2025 2,000,000.00 1,999,938.400.00 1,999,938.40 4.57 09/21/2029 1,179 100.272,005,440.86 5,502.46
1,999,938.40 0.45 NAAAA
096924AD7 BMWOT-25A-A3 02/04/2025
02/12/2025 4,350,000.00 4,349,571.520.00 4,349,571.52 4.56 09/25/2029 1,183 100.234,360,187.74 10,616.22
4,349,571.52 0.98 AaaAAA
02582JKM1 AXCMT-251-A 02/04/2025
02/11/2025 4,000,000.00 3,999,111.600.00 3,999,111.60 4.57 12/17/2029 1,266 100.374,014,902.36 15,790.76
3,999,111.60 0.90 NAAAA
ASSET-BACKED
SECURITIES
TOTAL
24,515,595.43 24,505,564.42
0.00 24,505,564.42 4.43 946 100.2124,566,445.05
60,880.63
24,505,564.42 5.50 AAA
CORPORATE
BONDS
24422EXV6 JOHN DEERE CAP 4.200
07/15/27 MTN
09/03/2024
09/06/2024 6,000,000.00 6,006,960.000.00 6,006,960.00 4.16 07/15/2027 380 99.985,998,920.00 (8,040.00)
6,006,960.00 1.34 A1A
48128GU99 JP MORGAN 1.250
07/31/27 '26 MTN
10/02/2024
10/03/2024 4,500,000.00 4,119,300.000.00 4,119,300.00 4.47 07/31/2027 396 96.064,322,610.00 203,310.00
4,119,300.00 0.97 A1A
478160DH4 JOHNSON&JOHNSON
4.550 03/01/28 '28
02/18/2025
02/20/2025 5,000,000.00 5,000,200.000.00 5,000,200.00 4.55 03/01/2028 610 100.565,028,000.00 27,800.00
5,000,200.00 1.12 AaaAAA
14913UAY6 CTRPLLR FIN SERV
4.400 03/03/28 MTN
08/14/2025
08/15/2025 5,000,000.00 5,051,550.00
0.00 5,051,550.00 3.97 03/03/2028 612 100.115,005,550.00 (46,000.00)
5,051,550.00 1.12 A1NA
931142FB4 WALMART 3.900
04/15/28 '28
09/17/2024
09/18/2024 5,625,000.00 5,673,262.500.00 5,673,262.50 3.64 04/15/2028 655 99.535,598,731.25 (74,531.25)
5,673,262.50 1.25 Aa2AA
053015AG8 ADP 1.700 05/15/28 '28 08/14/2025
08/15/2025 5,000,000.00 4,721,900.000.00 4,721,900.00 3.85 05/15/2028 685 95.434,771,550.00 49,650.00
4,721,900.00 1.07 Aa3AA437076BW1 HOME DEPOT 3.900
12/06/28 '28
04/22/2025
04/23/2025 5,000,000.00 4,941,500.000.00 4,941,500.00 4.25 12/06/2028 890 99.124,956,150.00 14,650.00
4,941,500.00 1.11 A2A
89236TLL7 TOYOTA MOTOR CRD
4.650 01/05/29 MTN
08/14/2025
08/15/2025 5,000,000.00 5,086,600.00
0.00 5,086,600.00 4.10 01/05/2029 920 100.41
5,020,300.00
(66,300.00)
5,086,600.00 1.12 A1
A+
66989HBF4 NOVARTIS CAP 4.100
03/16/29 '29
03/18/2026
03/19/2026 2,000,000.00 2,000,960.00
227.78 2,001,187.78 4.08 03/16/2029 990 99.27
1,985,380.00
(15,580.00)
2,000,960.00 0.44 Aa3
AA89236TMF9 TOYOTA MOTOR CRD
5.050 05/16/29 MTN
07/24/2024
07/25/2024 4,000,000.00 4,058,560.000.00 4,058,560.00 4.70 05/16/2029 1,051 101.444,057,440.00 (1,120.00)
4,058,560.00 0.91 A1A+
Position Statement
City Council 7 – 10 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
CUSIP DESCRIPTION
TRADE DATE
SETTLE DATE PAR VALUE
PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOTAL COST
YIELD TO
MATURITY
MATURITY
DATE
DAYS TO
MATURITY
MARKET PRICE
MARKET VALUE
UNREALIZED
GAIN/LOSS BOOK
VALUE
% OF
MV
MOODY'S
S&P
RATING
713448FX1 PEPSICO 4.500 07/17/29
'29
07/22/2024
07/23/2024 3,000,000.00 2,993,100.000.00 2,993,100.00 4.55 07/17/2029 1,113 100.333,009,750.00 16,650.00
2,993,100.00 0.67 A1A+
713448GB8 PEPSICO 4.600 02/07/30
'30
02/06/2025
02/07/2025 3,000,000.00 2,992,980.000.00 2,992,980.00 4.65 02/07/2030 1,318 100.803,024,090.00 31,110.00
2,992,980.00 0.68 A1A+
023135BS4 AMAZON.COM 1.500
06/03/30 '30
06/24/2025
06/25/2025 5,000,000.00 4,405,500.000.00 4,405,500.00 4.19 06/03/2030 1,434 89.284,463,950.00 58,450.00
4,405,500.00 1.00 A1AA
58933YBQ7 MERCK & CO 4.150
09/15/30 '30
10/10/2025
10/14/2025 5,000,000.00 5,018,850.00
0.00 5,018,850.00 4.06 09/15/2030 1,538 98.824,940,950.00 (77,900.00)
5,018,850.00 1.11 Aa3A+
30303MAB8 META PLATFORMS 4.200
11/15/30 '30
11/17/2025
11/18/2025 4,750,000.00 4,755,557.500.00 4,755,557.50 4.17 11/15/2030 1,599 98.424,674,902.50 (80,655.00)
4,755,557.50 1.05 Aa3
AA02079KBK2 ALPHABET 4.100 02/15/31
'31
02/10/2026
02/17/2026 3,000,000.00 3,000,240.001,366.67 3,001,606.67 4.10 02/15/2031 1,691 98.262,947,830.00 (52,410.00)
3,000,240.00 0.66 Aa2AA+
67066GAR5 NVIDIA 4.500 06/15/31 '31 06/17/2026
06/18/2026 5,250,000.00 5,244,907.500.00 5,244,907.50 4.52 06/15/2031 1,811 99.665,232,045.00 (12,862.50)
5,244,907.50 1.17 Aa1AA
CORPORATE
BONDS TOTAL 76,125,000.00 75,071,927.501,594.45 75,073,521.95 4.22 1,007 98.6675,038,148.75 (33,778.75)
75,071,927.50 16.79 A+
CITY OF SANTA
ANA TOTAL 449,966,401.43 447,889,120.7918,133.62 447,907,254.41 3.47 565 446,969,665.10 (919,455.69)
447,889,120.79 100.00 AA
GRAND TOTAL 449,966,401.43 447,889,120.79
18,133.62 447,907,254.41 3.47 565 446,969,665.10
(919,455.69)
447,889,120.79 100.00 AA
Position Statement
City Council 7 – 11 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
Transaction Statement
CITY OF SANTA ANA
TRADE DATE SETTLE DATE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR VALUE PRINCIPAL COST
PURCHASED
INTEREST TOTAL
PURCHASE
YIELD
BUY
06/03/2026 06/04/2026 62479MPS6 MUFG BANK NY 02/26/27 4,000,000.00 3,883,113.33 0.00 (3,883,113.33) 4.06 06/03/2026 06/08/2026 3140Q1AV2 FN BZ5419 6,585,000.00 6,502,687.50 5,339.34 (6,508,026.84) 4.47 06/17/2026 06/18/2026 67066GAR5 NVIDIA 4.500 06/15/31 '31 5,250,000.00 5,244,907.50 0.00 (5,244,907.50) 4.52 06/17/2026 06/23/2026 35802GAA8 FRESB 2026-SB127 A5F 4.39 02/25/2031 4,174,482.81 4,147,413.90 11,199.83 (4,158,613.73) 4.47 BUY TOTAL 20,009,482.81 19,778,122.23 16,539.17 (19,794,661.40) 4.41
TRADE DATE SETTLE DATE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR VALUE BOOK VALUE TOTAL NET
REALIZED
GAIN/LOSS
MATURITY
06/15/2026 06/15/2026 63873KFF9 Natixis, New York Branch 0.0 06/15/2026 (5,750,000.00) 5,601,515.84 5,750,000.00 148,484.16 06/19/2026 06/22/2026 45776NEN2 InsBank 0.9 06/19/2026 (248,000.00) 248,000.00 248,000.00 0.00 MATURITY TOTAL (5,998,000.00) 5,849,515.84 5,998,000.00 148,484.16
TRADE DATE SETTLE DATE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR VALUE BOOK VALUE TOTAL NET
REALIZED
GAIN/LOSS
PRINCIPAL PAYDOWN
06/15/2026 06/15/2026 437918AC9 HONDO-241-A3 (311,594.32) 315,160.61 311,594.32 (3,566.29) 06/25/2026 06/25/2026 3132XKVZ7 FH WN5131 (2,710.61) 2,733.48 2,710.61 (22.87)
PRINCIPAL PAYDOWN
TOTAL (314,304.93) 317,894.09 314,304.93 (3,589.16)
TRADE DATE SETTLE DATE CUSIP DESCRIPTION PAR VALUE BOOK VALUE TOTAL NET
REALIZED
GAIN/LOSS
SELL
06/03/2026 06/04/2026 3130AQW33 FHLBANKS 2.020 02/24/27 '26 (5,000,000.00) 5,000,000.00 4,933,650.00 (66,350.00) 06/03/2026 06/04/2026 037833DU1 APPLE 1.650 05/11/30 '30 (6,000,000.00) 5,346,180.00 5,419,440.00 73,260.00 06/17/2026 06/18/2026 478160DJ0 JOHNSON&JOHNSON 4.700 03/01/30 '30 (4,500,000.00) 4,507,695.00 4,562,595.00 54,900.00 06/17/2026 06/18/2026 742718FH7 PROCTER GAMBLE 3.000 03/25/30 (5,000,000.00) 4,808,650.00 4,771,800.00 (36,850.00) City Council 7 – 12 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
Transaction Statement
SELL TOTAL (20,500,000.00) 19,662,525.00 19,687,485.00 24,960.00 City Council 7 – 13 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
Income/Dividend Received
IDENTIFIER DESCRIPTION PAYMENT DATE POST DATE
INTEREST/DIVIDENDS
RECEIVED
BONY
3130APVC6 FHLBANKS 1.375 12/01/26 '26 06/01/2026 06/01/2026 34,375.00 91282CMA6 US TREASURY 4.125 11/30/29 05/31/2026 06/01/2026 44,343.75 261941108 BNY DREYFUS TRS SEC;INST 05/31/2026 06/02/2026 5,326.44 023135BS4 AMAZON.COM 1.500 06/03/30 '30 06/03/2026 06/03/2026 37,500.00 3130AQW33 FHLBANKS 2.020 02/24/27 '26 06/03/2026 06/04/2026 28,055.56 037833DU1 APPLE 1.650 05/11/30 '30 06/03/2026 06/04/2026 6,325.00 437076BW1 HOME DEPOT 3.900 12/06/28 '28 06/06/2026 06/08/2026 97,500.00 59013KPN0 MERRICK BANK 1.100 11/09/26 06/09/2026 06/09/2026 231.69 70962LAV4 PENTAGON FEDERA 1.000 11/10/26 06/10/2026 06/10/2026 210.63 15721UET2 CFBank National Association 0.85 07/10/2026 06/10/2026 06/10/2026 179.04 02589BAE0 AXCMT-243-A 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 23,002.00
79773KPD0 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & 4.800 06/15/29 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 96,360.00 79773KPC2 SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & 4.670 06/15/28 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 31,172.25 14041NGE5 COMET-241-A 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 16,333.34
91282CNH0 US TREASURY 3.875 06/15/28 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 77,500.00 437918AC9 HONDO-241-A3 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 15,374.67
02582JKM1 AXCMT-251-A 06/15/2026 06/15/2026 15,200.00
73319FBJ7 POPPY BNK 0.800 11/17/26 06/17/2026 06/17/2026 168.50 478160DJ0 JOHNSON&JOHNSON 4.700 03/01/30 '30 06/17/2026 06/18/2026 62,862.50 742718FH7 PROCTER GAMBLE 3.000 03/25/30 06/17/2026 06/18/2026 34,583.33 30781JAW0 FARMERS BK 0.850 11/19/26 06/19/2026 06/22/2026 179.04 45776NEN2 InsBank 0.9 06/19/2026 06/19/2026 06/22/2026 183.45 58404DMQ1 MEDALLION BANK 1.250 12/21/26 06/20/2026 06/22/2026 263.29 43814VAC1 HONDO-251-A3 06/21/2026 06/22/2026 7,616.67
3140NW7A7 FN BZ2688 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 11,663.75
3132XKTM9 FH WN5055 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 13,645.60
3140Q0L91 FN BZ4851 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 17,243.75
3132XKXN2 FH WN5184 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 19,375.00
City Council 7 – 14 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA | JUNE 30, 2026
Income/Dividend Received
3137HFF59 FHMS K-527 A2 4.618 07/25/2029 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 9,236.00 3137HN6B9 FHMS K-547 A2 4.421 05/25/2030 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 6,447.29 3137HJ5Y9 FHMS K-534 A2 4.7 11/25/2029 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 7,833.33 3140NWBC8 FN BZ1834 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 21,080.00
3132XKVZ7 FH WN5131 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 11,938.15
3132XGZG4 FH WN2542 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 6,953.47
3140Q16V7 FN BZ6283 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 12,778.89
3140Q0SB9 FN BZ5013 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 18,532.83
096924AD7 BMWOT-25A-A3 06/25/2026 06/25/2026 16,530.00
3132XKWE3 FH WN5144 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 12,830.56
3132XFMR6 FH WN1267 06/01/2026 06/25/2026 20,554.72
91282CPR6 US TREASURY 3.625 12/31/30 06/30/2026 06/30/2026 63,437.50 91282CNK3 US TREASURY 3.875 06/30/30 06/30/2026 06/30/2026 116,250.00 91282CEW7 US TREASURY 3.250 06/30/27 06/30/2026 06/30/2026 105,625.00 3130AQAB9 FHLBANKS 1.625 12/30/26 '26 06/30/2026 06/30/2026 30,468.75 BONY - TOTAL 1,157,270.74
TOTAL 1,157,270.74
City Council 7 – 15 9/15/2026
Meeder provides monthly statements for its investment management clients to provide information about the investment portfolio. The information should not be used for audit or confirmation purposes. Please review your custodial statements and report any inaccuracies or discrepancies.
Certain information and data has been supplied by unaffiliated third parties. Although Meeder believes the information is reliable, it cannot warrant the accuracy of information offered by third parties. Market value may reflect prices received from pricing vendors when current market quotations are not available. Prices may not reflect firm bids or offers and may differ from the value at which the security can be sold.
Statements may include positions from unmanaged accounts provided for reporting purposes. Unmanaged accounts are managed directly by the client and are not included in the accounts managed by Meeder. This information is provided as a client convenience and Meeder assumes no responsibility for performance of these accounts or the accuracy of the data reported.
Investing involves risk. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Debt and fixed income securities are subject to credit and interest rate risk. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investors shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.
Meeder Public Funds, Inc. is a registered investment adviser and affiliate of Meeder Investment Management, Inc. Investment advisory services are provided through Meeder Public Funds, Inc. Please contact us if you would like to receive a copy of our current ADV disclosure brochure or privacy policy. © 2026 Meeder Investment Management
meederpublicfunds.com | 866.633.3371
Disclosure
City Council 7 – 16 9/15/2026
Investments Amount
Bank of New York Mellon - Investment Custodian 293,890,153.71 Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F) 74,248,909.73
Local Agency Investment Fund (L.A.I.F) - ARPA 6,140,058.35 California CLASS 48,591,467.43
Total - Investments $ 422,870,589.22
Cash Held at City Financial Institution(s) and Cash on Hand Amount General Account 22,051,636.28
General Liability Account 1,485,971.92
Workers Compensation Account 1,401,398.37
Petty Cash 79,525.00
Total - Cash Held at City Financial
Institution(s) and Cash on Hand $ 25,018,531.57
Restricted Cash Amount
Signature Bank - Streetlight Project 1,268,869.87
2024 Water Bond 18,022,446.10
US Bank - Pension Stability Funds (Section 115 Trust with PARS) 50,807,514.41 State of California Condemnation Fund - Right of Way Deposits 687,525.00 Various US Bank & BNY 112,396.38
Housing Account 6,062,739.46
Santa Ana Federal Credit Union - Family Self Sufficiency (FSS-Housing) 892,957.80 Commissary Account 292,445.93
Flexible Benefit Spending Account 334,500.30
Total - Restricted Cash $ 78,481,395.25
Total Cash Held City at Financial Institution(s), Cash on Hand and Restricted Cash $ 526,370,516.04 Cash by Fund(s) - Total (see below for listing) $ 526,370,516.04
DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
City General Ledger Cash Summary
City Council 7 – 17 9/15/2026
DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
011 GENERAL FUND 178,979,812.09
012 CANNABIS PUBLIC BENEFIT 16,086,916.27
016 CASP CERTIFICATION & TRAINING 731,423.64
020 OTS
-TRAFFIC OFFENDER PROGRAM 19,639.74
021 PRCSA CATV FUND 1,832,280.86
022 PRCSA FEE & DONATION 325,250.35
023 INMATE WELFARE FUND 3,223,810.99
024 PD ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES LEAGUE (495,282.07)
025 IDB & EZ VOUCHER MONITORING 186,686.59
026 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 392,217.22
027 PARKING FUND 3,821,713.52
029 SPECIAL GAS TAX 32,949,913.83
030 PROP 1B BOND ACT OF 2006 163,822.99
031 AIR QUALITY IMPR. (AB 2766) 681,742.72
032 MEASURE M
-STREET CONSTRUCTION 4,617,898.62
033 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA B 613,124.04
034 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA E 1,322,748.01
035 NEW TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA F 1,008,307.24
041 TRANSP SYS IMPR AREA A
-2 1,215,556.23
042 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA B 20,969.13
043 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA C 308,583.72
044 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA D 18,770.09
048 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA C
-2 288,955.75
049 TRANSPO SYS IMPR AREA G 116,280.99
051 CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 2,580,856.24
053 CITY SERVICES 8,334,379.57
054 SANITARY SEWER CAPITAL 9,243,950.09
055 SEWER CONNECTION FEE 5,424,705.10
056 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 12,148,627.64
057 FED CLEAN WATER PROTECTION ENT 4,459,228.81
058 RESIDENTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT 7,061,107.31
059 SELECT STREET CONSTRUCTION 20,961,946.29
060 WATER REVENUE 33,225,397.10
066 ACQUISITION & CONSTRUCTION 4,965,134.66
067 REGIONAL TRANSP CENTER 1,034,868.49
068 SANITATION FUND 2,039,720.05
069 REFUSE COLLECTION SERVICE 8,115,939.02
070 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 5,942,263.59
City Council 073 BUILDING MAINT FUND 1,939,210.83 7 – 18 9/15/2026
DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
074 CIVIC CENTER MAINTENANCE (278,606.31)
075 FLEET MAINTENANCE/STORES 2,492,322.93
078 RETIREMENT SYSTEM 1,945,784.78
080 LIABILITY AND PROPERTY INS FND 13,870,328.76
081 EMPLOYEE GROUP INSURANCE 5,805,296.88
082 WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND 17,007,417.53
083 PAYROLL REVOLVING 7,444,658.11
085 CITY YARD OPERATION (211,870.79)
087 PT RETIREMENT FUND 11,379.98
089 CA SEISMIC HAZARD PROGRAM 93,076.27
090 ORANGE CO SANITATION DIST 2&3 501,408.46
095 POLICE COMMISSARY ACCOUNT 181,376.08
096 SA TOURISM MARKETING DISTRICT 133,038.85
097 POLICE SEIZED ASSETS 5,387,279.32
101 PUB WKS
-ADMIN & PLANNING 2,970,660.10
103 PMA RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 10,114.88
104 SEIU RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 63,824.25
106 MGMT RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 17,198.93
107 UC RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE 6,289.81
109 INFO SYS STRATEGIC PLAN 15,438,265.82
110 STRONG MOTION INSTRUMENTATION 121,134.04
111 OPIOID REMEDIATION 4,473,082.06
112 GOLF COURSE (27,383.10)
120 FIRE FACILITIES FUND 3,364,091.00
121 SPECIAL REPAIR/DEMOLITION 784,279.48
122 EMERGENCY & HEALTH GRANTS 3,879,510.26
123 WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT (758,423.65)
124 ORANGE COUNTY SSA GRANTS 2,367.31
125 OES UASI (3,940,388.59)
127 D.O.J. GRANT FUND 61,529.36
128 POLICE BLOCK GRANTS 2,459,461.47
130 HOME PROGRAM FEDERAL GRANT 4,625,726.72
131 MISC GRANTS 146,213.64
133 HOUSING AUTHORITY
-ISSUER FEE 1,599,119.90
135 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT (666,939.84)
136 HOUSING AUTHORITY
-VOUCHER HAP 1,633,566.28
137 HOUSING AUTHORITY
- NED 3,768.55
138 HOUSING AUTHORITY
-MS 5 29,399.71
139 HOUSING AUTHORITY
-NEW CONSTR 446,363.65 City Council 7 – 19 9/15/2026
DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
140 HOUSING AUTHORITY-VOUCHER ADM 3,849,233.76
142 NSP FEDERAL GRANT 488,674.15
143 CALHOME MFGD HSG LOAN 127,684.73
144 PRISON TO EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (19,947.52)
145 RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANT 11,131.34
147 FEDERAL AID SAFETY PROGRAM (1,689,843.14)
148 TRAFFIC SYSTEM MGMT GRANT (7,096,881.37)
149 WIC ASSESSMENT DIST ST IMPRV 34,983.75
152 PUBLIC LIBRARY GRANT FUND 4,525,308.35
158 PLANNING GRANTS PROGRAM 632,329.25
161 PRCSA CAPITAL GRANTS (1,173,862.20)
164 PUB WKS
-WTR QUALITY & CONTROL (5,806,377.71)
165 OFFICE OF SAFETY GRANT 109,058.03
166 US DOJ ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 2,529,448.28
167 US TREASURY ASSET FORFEITURE 219,147.18
169 RECREATION GRANTS FUND 332,162.54
177 EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSISTANCE PG 11,273.94
179 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS 90,354.54
180 ARPA EHV ADMIN FEES 60,151.69
181 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT 2,125,308.55
182 HOME
-ARP PROGRAM FEDERAL GRANT (4,508.29)
183 ARPA
- CA FOR ALL YOUTH WDP (4,868.90)
185 RENT STABILIZATION 3,239,792.17
186 HCV F S S FORFEITURES 460,400.32
221 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA I 1,240,779.98
222 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA II 621,972.50
223 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA III 222,697.46
224 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA IV 889,186.04
225 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA V 461,766.34
226 LOCAL DRAINAGE AREA VI 1,262,453.40
311 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 1 1,379,688.94
312 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 2 7,383,166.50
313 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 3 2,114,383.77
314 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP DISTRICT 4 221,998.99
315 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOP HARBOR SPECFIC 158,207.36
404 COSA 2014 LEASE FINANCING 32.51
406 2021 PENSION OBLIGATION BONDS 5,763.83
417 INCLUSIONARY HOUSING FEE 7,022,992.01
418 CDA
- PEEBLER CAPITAL FUND 204,453.32 City Council 7 – 20 9/15/2026
DATA PROVIDED AND VERIFIED BY THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
Fund Fund description Amount
607 HOUSING AUTHORITY LMIHF 3,857,752.50
655 2018A SERIES TAX ALLOC BOND 37,130.12
670 COSA RDA 764,839.48
671 COSA RDA OBLIGATION RETIREMENT 12,953,924.30
991 TRAN SYS IMP AUT C-2 TUSTIN 2,485,780.13
992 TRAN SYS IMP AUT AREA D-TUSTIN 9,769,672.81
993 WIC ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 517,449.33
999 Lawson Clearing 4,821.76
Reconciling Item(s) - Outstanding Checks * 4,533,171.03 Reconciling Item(s) - Bank Direct Deposits* 654,844.65
Reconciling Item(s) - Deposits in Transit* (2,016,813.63) Withdrawals in Transit (79,194.34)
Reconciling Item(s) - Various* (386,758.73)
City Council 7 – 21 9/15/2026
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.gov/pwa
Item # 8
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Orange County Grand Jury's Investigative Report Titled “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” dated June 6, 2026
AGENDA TITLE
Receive and File the Orange County Grand Jury's Investigative Report Titled “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water,” Approve the Proposed City’s Response, and Authorize the City Manager to Submit the City’s Response to the Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Receive and file the Orange County Grand Jury's report titled “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water;” and
2. Approve the City's response to Findings F2, F4, F6, and F8 and Recommendations R2, R4, and R5; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to submit the response to the Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court in accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05.
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
In June 2026, the Orange County Grand Jury (OCGJ) issued a report entitled, “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” (Exhibit 1).
The report evaluates the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in Orange County drinking water, PFAS monitoring and treatment efforts, applicable state and federal regulatory requirements, the progress of treatment facility planning and implementation, and public education. The report includes eight findings and six recommendations intended to strengthen PFAS monitoring, reporting, treatment, and public outreach by Orange County water agencies.
The City of Santa Ana is the sole water purveyor serving Santa Ana residents and businesses and relies primarily on local groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin. For more than a decade, the City has monitored PFAS through the City Council 8 – 1 9/15/2026
Orange County Grand Jury's Investigative Report Titled “PFAS and Public Awareness:
A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” dated June 6, 2026 September 15, 2026
United States Environmental Protection Agency's Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) programs, including UCMR 3 and UCMR 5, and through multiple monitoring orders issued by the California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water. The City also works closely with the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to advance PFAS treatment projects to maintain the reliability and quality of the City’s groundwater supply.
The City has taken significant steps to monitor PFAS, protect its water supply, and preserve the availability of local groundwater. The City completed its first PFAS treatment facility at Well 40 in May 2023. Treatment projects for Wells 31, 38, 27, and 28 are under construction, with additional centralized treatment projects being advanced or planned at the John Garthe and Walnut Reservoir sites. The City also provides PFAS information and project updates through its annual Water Quality Reports, dedicated Water Quality webpage, and project-specific community outreach.
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the City is required to respond to applicable findings and recommendations contained in the OCGJ report.
Of the eight findings and six recommendations, the City is required to respond to four findings (F2, F4, F6, and F8) and three recommendations (R2, R4, and R5). The City’s proposed response addresses each required finding and recommendation based on the City’s existing monitoring, treatment, regulatory compliance, and public outreach efforts (Exhibit 2). The required findings and recommendations, along with a summary of the City’s responses, are provided below.
Findings
• F2 - PFAS is widespread and contamination has been detected in Orange County groundwater sources. Community water systems are required to report PFAS monitoring results in their annual Consumer Confidence Reports.
City Response – The City agrees that PFAS is present in portions of the Orange County Groundwater Basin, including groundwater sources serving the City. The City has monitored PFAS for more than a decade through UCMR 3, UCMR 5, and multiple monitoring orders issued by the California Division of Drinking Water. Applicable PFAS monitoring results are reported through the City’s annual Water Quality Report, with additional information available through the City’s Water Quality webpage.
• F4 - OCWD has taken a proactive leadership role in addressing PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, though PFAS treatment implementation varies across local cities and water districts.
City Response – The City agrees that OCWD has provided regional leadership, City Council 8 – 2 9/15/2026
Orange County Grand Jury's Investigative Report Titled “PFAS and Public Awareness:
A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” dated June 6, 2026 September 15, 2026
monitoring support, treatment planning, and financial assistance to local groundwater producers. The City has worked closely with OCWD to advance PFAS treatment projects, including the operational Well 40 treatment facility and treatment projects currently under construction or being planned. Differences in treatment schedules among water agencies reflect variations in well conditions, site constraints, treatment capacities, permitting requirements, and construction needs.
• F6 - Orange County drinking water meets or exceeds state and federal standards and is safe for consumption without additional home filtration.
City Response – The City agrees that Orange County drinking water meets applicable state and federal standards and is safe for consumption without household filtration. The City continues to monitor its water sources and distribution system in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. • F8 - There are limited online PFAS education and outreach programs among Orange County water retailers. Most retailers rely on OCWD for PFAS education and outreach. PFAS advisories were included in approximately 55% of the Orange County water retailers' annual water quality reports in 2025.
City Response – The City agrees that PFAS outreach practices vary among Orange County water retailers, but disagrees to the extent the finding suggests that Santa Ana has limited online PFAS education or relies primarily on OCWD for PFAS outreach. The City maintains a dedicated Water Quality webpage (https://santa-ana.gov/water-quality/), provides PFAS information in its annual Water Quality Reports, and conducts project-specific community outreach regarding its PFAS treatment program.
Recommendations
• R2 - By July 1, 2029, OCWD and its member agencies should monitor PFAS in groundwater and surface water sources and promptly implement PFAS treatment when response levels are exceeded. [F2, F4]
City Response – The City is already implementing the actions identified in this recommendation. The City monitors its groundwater production wells in accordance with applicable state and federal requirements and coordinates with OCWD regarding groundwater monitoring. When monitoring identifies conditions requiring action, the City restricts use of affected sources as appropriate and implements treatment or other corrective measures in coordination with regulators and OCWD. These monitoring and treatment efforts are already underway and will continue through and beyond July 1, 2029.
City Council 8 – 3 9/15/2026
Orange County Grand Jury's Investigative Report Titled “PFAS and Public Awareness:
A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” dated June 6, 2026 September 15, 2026
• R4 - By July 1, 2029, all Orange County water retailers should consistently include a PFAS advisory, treatment facilities status, and compliance information in consumer confidence reports and on agency websites, using clear and understandable language for the public. [F2, F8]
City Response – The City is already implementing the public reporting and communication practices identified in this recommendation. The City provides PFAS monitoring, compliance, treatment facility, and drinking water safety information through its annual Water Quality Reports and Water Quality webpage and will continue updating these resources in clear, understandable language as treatment projects and regulatory requirements evolve.
• R5 - By September 30, 2026, OCWD and all Orange County water retailers should enhance coordinated public education efforts to reassure their customers about drinking water safety. [F6, F8]
City Response – The City is already implementing coordinated PFAS public education through multiple established channels, including its Water Quality webpage, annual Water Quality Reports, and project-specific community outreach. The City also coordinates with OCWD and other regulatory agencies to provide consistent and accurate information regarding drinking water safety.
These coordinated efforts are already underway and will continue through and beyond September 30, 2026 as PFAS projects advance and regulatory requirements evolve.
The City’s response demonstrates that many of the practices identified in the OCGJ report are already incorporated into the City’s water quality monitoring, PFAS treatment, and public outreach programs. The response also identifies the City’s continued commitment to monitoring PFAS, advancing treatment projects, maintaining regulatory compliance, and providing transparent information to the community.
The OCGJ report is provided for City Council’s receipt and filing. The City’s proposed response is recommended for City Council approval. Upon approval, the City Manager will be authorized to submit the City’s response to the Presiding Judge of the Orange County Superior Court in accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
City Council 8 – 4 9/15/2026
Orange County Grand Jury's Investigative Report Titled “PFAS and Public Awareness:
A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water” dated June 6, 2026 September 15, 2026
EXHIBIT(S)
1. County of Orange Grand Jury Report, "PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water"
2. City of Santa Ana Response to County of Orange Grand Jury Report, "PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water" Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director of Public Works Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 8 – 5 9/15/2026
Fcalifornia stateting,4
PFAS and Public Awareness
A Closer Look at Orange County
Drinking Water
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026
Exhibt 1
City Council 8 – 6 9/15/2026
City Council 8 – 7 9/15/2026
This page intentionally left blank
City Council 8 – 8 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 3 of 62
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 5 BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................. 5 REASON FOR STUDY ................................................................................................... 8 METHOD OF STUDY ...................................................................................................... 8 INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS .................................................................................. 9 FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................... 35 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................. 36 COMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................... 37 REQUIRED RESPONSES ............................................................................................ 39 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................... 46 Glossary ........................................................................................................................ 50 Bibliography .................................................................................................................. 51 Appendix A .................................................................................................................... 55 Appendix B .................................................................................................................... 62
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Potential Major Exposure Pathways of PFAS to Humans ............................... 6 Figure 2 - Orange County Groundwater Public Supply Wells ........................................ 11 Figure 3 - Orange County Water District (OCWD) Service Area ................................... 12 Figure 4 - Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) Service Area ............ 13 Figure 5 - The PFAS Cycle ............................................................................................ 15 Figure 6 - Wastewater Treatment Discharges to the Santa Ana River .......................... 16 Figure 7 - CDC Multi-site Study Site Orange County, CA .............................................. 17 Figure 8 - Average PFAS Levels in Blood, CDC Multi-site Study Virtual Open House, July 2025 ....................................................................................................... 18 Figure 9 - How are people exposed to PFAS? .............................................................. 20 Figure 10 - Are PFAS Safe? .......................................................................................... 22 Figure 11 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources During UCMR 3 and UCMR 5 Monitoring Cycles ......................................................................... 24 City Council 8 – 9 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Figure 12 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources Listed on Each SWRCB Monitoring Order Exhibit A ............................................................ 25 Figure 13 - PFAS Rule Enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals ............................................................................ 27 Figure 14 - Timeline of OCWD Response to PFAS in the Santa Ana River Basin ......... 29 Figure 15 - Map of Current and Future PFAS Treatment Locations .............................. 30 Figure 16 - Approximate PFAS Capital Funding Sources .............................................. 31 Figure 17 - Summary of PFAS Treatment Facilities ...................................................... 32 Figure 18 - OCWD Share of PFAS Treatment Facility Annual O&M Cost ..................... 33 Figure 19 - PFAS Monthly Cost to OCWD Service Area Residents .............................. 34 Figure 20 - UCMR 3 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants ...................................... 55 Figure 21 - UCMR 5 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants ...................................... 56 Figure 22 - SWRCB PFAS General Monitoring Orders Issued 2020 through 2025 ....... 57 Figure 23 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2020-0003-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 58 Figure 24 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2021-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 59 Figure 25 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2022-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 60 Figure 26 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2025-0002-DDW, PFAS Constituents . 61 Figure 27 - EPA Eight Content Requirements of a Consumer Confidence Report ........ 62 City Council 8 – 10 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 5 of 62
SUMMARY
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) form a broad class of thousands of synthetic chemicals characterized by strong carbon–fluorine bonds and are among the most durable compounds in organic chemistry. This bond strength makes PFAS highly resistant to breaking down, allowing them to persist in the environment for decades or longer. Because of this persistence, PFAS are often called “forever chemicals.” Various industries have used PFAS in consumer and commercial applications since the 1940s because their chemical properties provide water, oil, and stain resistance, as well as heat stability. These properties support applications across numerous sectors, including aerospace, automotive, textiles, firefighting foams, food packaging, electronics, and medical devices. As a result of their widespread use and persistence, PFAS now appear globally in water, air, soil, wildlife, and human blood.
Scientific studies continue to show associations between PFAS exposure and harmful health effects in humans and animals, although the degree of risk varies by compound.
In response, federal and state agencies, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), began accelerating regulatory actions in the 2010s to reduce PFAS exposure, enhance monitoring, and develop treatment and disposal methods.
This report identifies and describes PFAS levels detected by Orange County drinking water agencies. It evaluates how these agencies have responded to recent PFAS regulatory requirements. It also examines the progress of PFAS treatment facility planning and installation, along with implementation of public education programs related to PFAS in drinking water. This report’s findings and recommendations aim to strengthen PFAS reporting in annual Water Quality Reports (Consumer Confidence Reports) and expand public outreach by Orange County drinking water agencies.
BACKGROUND
PFAS are a large group of man-made "forever chemicals" produced since the 1940s, known for extreme persistence, environmental mobility, and bioaccumulation due to strong carbon-fluorine bonds.1 Used in water/stain-resistant coatings, firefighting foams, industrial processes, PFAS have contaminated soil, water, and air globally. 1 Elsie M. Sunderland, et al., “A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects,” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, November 23, 2018, accessed March 16, 2026, https://sunderlandlab.org/assets/sunderland_jeseerev_2018wsi.pdf.
City Council 8 – 11 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Contaminated drinking water has led to high levels of exposure to PFOA, PFOS, and other PFAS2 for some populations residing near manufacturing facilities. Workers in facilities that make or use PFAS can be exposed to higher amounts of these chemicals and have higher levels in their blood.3 Infants may be exposed to PFAS through breastfeeding.4
Figure 1 - Potential Major Exposure Pathways of PFAS to Humans5 PFAS, especially PFOA and PFOS, have been detected in air, water, and soil in and around manufacturing facilities. However, these releases have been declining since companies began phasing out the production and use of several PFAS in the early 2000s.6 Due to their chemical structure, PFAS are very stable in the environment and are resistant to breaking down. Some PFAS are volatile and can be carried long distances through the air, which may lead to contamination of soils and groundwater far from the source of the PFAS emission.7
The four major sources of PFAS are: fire training/fire response sites, industrial sites, landfills, and wastewater treatment plants/biosolids. PFAS can get into drinking water when products containing them are used or spilled onto the ground or into lakes and rivers. Once in groundwater, PFAS are easily transported long distances and can 2 Kyle Steenland, Tony Fletcher, and David A. Savitz, “Epidemiologic Evidence on the Health Effects of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA),” National Library of Medicine, accessed May 12, 2026, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920088/.
3 Sunderland, “A review of the pathways of human exposure.” 4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid.
7 “Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) PFAS General," California State Water Resources Control Board, March 4, 2019, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/pfas_general_faq.pdf.
City Council 8 – 12 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 7 of 62
contaminate drinking wells. PFAS in the air can also end up in rivers and lakes used for drinking water.8
PFAS have been used extensively in surface coating and protectant formulations due to their unique ability to repel oil, grease, and water. Major applications have included protectants for paper and cardboard packaging products, carpets, leather products, and textiles that enhance water, grease, and soil repellency, and in firefighting foams. PFAS have also been used as processing aids in the manufacture of nonstick coatings on cookware. Common consumer products containing PFAS include Teflon, Gore-Tex and Scotchgard.9
Background Summary of PFAS and Its Effects
Source and Exposure: Primary sources include industrial sites, firefighting training, landfills, and wastewater treatment plants. They enter drinking water, food, and indoor dust, resulting in widespread human exposure.
Health and Environmental Impact: PFAS are associated with adverse effects, including cancer (i.e. testicular, kidney), developmental delays, liver damage, and high cholesterol. They do not break down easily, leading to "background" contamination even in remote areas.10
Regulation and Action: While major US manufacturing of certain PFAS ended around 2015, they remain in products and in the environment. The EPA has established Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for drinking water.11 "Forever Chemicals" Definition: Their chemical structure, featuring one of the strongest bonds in organic chemistry, makes them resistant to heat, water, and oil, thus earning them the nickname "forever chemicals.”12
In Orange County, PFAS have been detected in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, which provides 77% to 85% of the drinking water for north and central parts of the county. Local agencies have taken a proactive stance, shutting down dozens of impacted wells and building some of the nation's largest treatment facilities to ensure tap water meets safety standards.13
8 “PFAS background,” California State Water Resources Control Board, January 14, 2025, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/background.html
9 Ibid.
10 “PFAS Explained,” EPA, accessed March 11, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained. 11 “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation,” Accessed May 12, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. 12 Ibid.
13 University of California, Irvine, “UCI PFAS Health Study, Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed May 12, 2026, https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/frequently-asked-questions/.
City Council 8 – 13 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
REASON FOR STUDY
Recent regulatory actions related to PFAS have created significant operational, financial, and communication challenges for drinking water agencies across California.
Orange County agencies face an intensifying timeline due to the region’s reliance on groundwater supplies, the presence of PFAS in local aquifers, and the need to comply with evolving state and federal standards. As regulatory and monitoring requirements expand, agencies must rapidly adapt their treatment strategies, capital planning, and public outreach efforts.
This study is necessary to provide a clear, up-to-date understanding of how Orange County drinking water agencies are responding to these new requirements. Evaluating the status of PFAS treatment planning and installation helps illustrate the extent of infrastructure readiness, the pace of implementation, and the challenges agencies encounter as they work to bring new systems online. At the same time, assessing the development and delivery of PFAS-related education programs offers insight into how effectively agencies are communicating risks, regulatory changes, and water quality information to the public.
By documenting current conditions and identifying gaps or emerging needs, the study supports informed decision-making among water providers, policymakers, and ratepayers. This work helps ensure that Orange County communities receive safe drinking water and that agencies are equipped to meet regulatory expectations while maintaining public trust.
METHOD OF STUDY
The Orange County Grand Jury investigated the PFAS in Orange County drinking water to provide a clear and accurate assessment. The Grand Jury based its study on a comprehensive review of multiple sources, including interviews, public records, field investigations, and relevant news articles. Multiple independent sources corroborated and validated all facts, findings, and recommendations presented in the report. Interviewed several Orange County governmental leaders and senior staff directly involved in managing drinking water quality
Reviewed and analyzed key documents related to the investigation, including:
o Published Water Quality reports from all Orange County water retailers o Records from all Orange County water agencies
Examined news articles and publications relevant to the topic. Conducted extensive internet research.
City Council 8 – 14 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 9 of 62
Performed field investigations in which Grand Jury members visited several water management agencies to directly observe and assess drinking water processes.
INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS
The 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury investigated the presence of PFAS in Orange County drinking water and the response of Orange County community water systems. Community water systems (CWS) are city, county, regulated utilities, regional water systems and even small water companies and districts where people live. Noncommunity water systems14 provide drinking water to the public at locations where people do not reside permanently. The investigation included evaluation of Orange County CWS compliance with federal and state PFAS monitoring and reporting requirements and the extent of the voluntary response to PFAS contamination. The Grand Jury also evaluated annual Consumer Confidence Reports, also called Annual Water Quality Reports, which are issued annually by CWS and distributed to their customers.
Orange County Drinking Water Systems
The Grand Jury investigation was limited to community water systems (CWS) operated by cities or special districts that are regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act . 15 CWS are defined as public water systems that serve at least 15 service connections used by yearlong residents, or regularly serve at least 25 yearlong residents of the area served by the system.16 In Orange County, there are 31 such CWS that are operated by cities or special districts and that sell drinking water directly to customers on a retail basis. In this report, these Orange County CWS may be referred to as retail water districts or water retailers.
Drinking Water Sources
North and Central Orange County
Orange County is divided into two distinct areas when it comes to drinking water sources. There are 2.5 million residents of north and central Orange County, who receive about 85% of their drinking water supplies from the Orange County Groundwater Basin, and the remaining 15% of their water supplies are imported from 14 “California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 116275,” FindLaw, accessed May 21,2026, https://codes.findlaw.com/ca/health-and-safety-code/hsc-sect-116275/. 15 “Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” EPA, describing statutory authority at 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq., accessed My 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-safe-drinking-water-act. 16 “California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 116275,” FindLaw.
City Council 8 – 15 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
the State Water Project and Colorado River delivered by Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC).17
South Orange County
Approximately 600,000 residents of south Orange County rely primarily on imported water supplies delivered by MWDOC, and a few south County communities also have groundwater supplies from the San Juan Basin and surface water supplies from Irvine Lake (also referred to as the Santiago Reservoir).18
Public Supply Wells
According to the California Department of Water Resources (DWR) as of November 2024,19 there were a total of 217 public supply wells for drinking water in Orange County. Of the 217 total wells, 211 were CWS wells and six were non-community water system wells. See Figure 2 for a Department of Water Resources map of Orange County groundwater public supply wells. This map illustrates the reliance of north and central Orange County on groundwater sources, and the reliance of south Orange County on imported water supplies.
17 “How water works in Orange County,” OCWD, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/learningcenter/how-water-works-in-oc/. 18 Ibid.
19 “California’s Groundwater Live: Well Infrastructure,” California Department of Water Resources, accessed April 13, 2026, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/f2b252d15a0d4e49887ba94ac17cc4bb.
City Council 8 – 16 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 11 of 62
Source: State of California, Department of Water Resources Figure 2 - Orange County Groundwater Public Supply Wells Orange County Water District
Orange County Water District (OCWD) manages the Orange County Groundwater Basin to ensure sustainable use through replenishment of groundwater and delivery of water supplies to its 19 member agencies. Some OCWD member agencies are also members of MWDOC.
City Council 8 – 17 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Figure 3 - Orange County Water District (OCWD) Service Area Municipal Water District of Orange County
MWDOC is the wholesale water provider and resource planning agency that partners with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) to deliver imported water to its 27 member agencies.20 Some MWDOC member agencies are also members of OCWD.
20 “How water works in Orange County,” OCWD.
City Council 8 – 18 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 13 of 62
Source: MWDOC
Figure 4 - Municipal Water District of Orange County (MWDOC) Service Area PFAS and the Health Effects of Exposure
What are PFAS?
PFAS are a large group of many thousands of manufactured chemicals that are resistant to heat, oil, and water. Among the many thousands of different PFAS, some have been more widely used and studied than others.21 PFAS have been used extensively in surface coating and protectant formulations due to their unique ability to reduce the surface tension of liquids, and their ability to repel oil, grease, water, and staining. Major applications have included use as processing aids in the manufacture of nonstick coatings on cookware, surface protectants for paper and cardboard such as disposable food packaging, microwave popcorn bags, pizza boxes, and candy wrappers. Other surface protectants include those used on furniture and carpets, 21 “PFAS Explained,” EPA.
City Council 8 – 19 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
leather products, outdoor gear, and textiles.22 PFAS are also one of the main components of aqueous film forming foams (AFFF) used frequently at airports and military bases for firefighting and emergency response training activities.23 It is important to note that PFAS-containing firefighting foams and other emergency response materials containing PFAS are no longer in use at Orange County airports and harbors.24
PFOA and PFOS are two types of PFAS of particular concern that are no longer manufactured or imported into the US. Trace amounts of PFOA and PFOS may still be contained in some imported goods and in other PFAS goods and materials that are still produced and used in the US.25 Under the PFOA Stewardship Program with the EPA, eight major PFAS producers have phased out PFOA and other PFAS substances from their emissions and products; however, manufacturers are replacing substances in the PFAS family with others such as GenX and ADONA.26
Understanding the PFAS Cycle: How PFAS Moves Through the Environment PFAS move through the environment in a repeating cycle through air, water, soil, products, animals, and humans. This is known as the PFAS cycle. This cycle can be described in four stages and is illustrated at Figure 5.27 Manufacturing and use. The PFAS cycle begins during manufacturing or everyday use of PFAS-containing consumer and industrial products. During manufacture and use, PFAS are released into the air, water, and soil. As more PFAS are manufactured and used, the more they accumulate because they are persistent and resistant to degradation.
Environmental spread. After PFAS are released to the environment, they move through wind, snowfall, rain, and runoff to soil and surface water, and infiltration to groundwater. Industrial sites and wastewater treatment plants are key entry points 22 “Our Current Understanding of the Human Health and Environmental Risks of PFAS,” EPA, Accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/pfas/our-current-understanding-human-health-and-environmentalrisks-pfas. 23 Sunderland. “A review of the pathways of human exposure.” 24 “SB-1044 Compliance: Phasing Out PFAS in Class B Firefighting Foam,” CAL FIRE, accessed April 17, 2026, https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/pipeline-safety-and-cupa/fire-fighting-equipment-and-foampfas. 25 “PFAS – Frequently Asked Questions,” California State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality (SWRCB), 5, [3] 3M Company, “Fluorochemical use, distribution and release overview.,” AR226-0550, 1999, updated March 19, 2020, accessed March 25, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf. 26 “Risk Management for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) under TSCA,” EPA, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managing-chemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-andpolyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. 27 “Understanding the PFAS Cycle,” EcoPulse, accessed April 13, 2026, https://www.ecopulsenow.com/insights/understanding-the-pfas-cycle.
City Council 8 – 20 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 15 of 62
into the environment. PFAS are absorbed from the environment by plants and animals, and then move up the food chain.
Human exposure. Most people are exposed to PFAS through using PFAScontaminated products, drinking contaminated water, and eating contaminated food such as fish caught from water contaminated by PFAS, and dairy products from livestock exposed to PFAS.28 The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) estimated that in NHANES 2017–2018 data 98% of the US population had combined PFAS serum levels greater than 2 nanograms per milliliter.29
Re-entry. Even after disposal of PFAS products, PFAS can re-enter the environment through landfill leachate or runoff to soils, agricultural spreading of biosolids, and municipal wastewater treatment effluent discharges to surface water, resulting in PFAS cycling back into soil, animal feed crops, and water.
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Figure 5 - The PFAS Cycle
What is the Source of PFAS in Orange County Groundwater? Wastewater treatment plants located along the Santa Ana River that discharge effluent to the Santa Ana River upstream of managed aquifer recharge operations are sources 28 “Risk Management for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) under TSCA,” EPA. 29 “National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. NHANES 2017-18 Overview,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), accessed April 16, 2026,
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2017.
City Council 8 – 21 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
of PFAS contamination for public water systems downstream of these wastewater treatment plants.30 The OCWD Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS) actively manages and recharges the Orange County groundwater basin with surface water from the Santa Ana River, imported surface water, and purified recycled water from the GWRS. For much of the year, flow in the Santa Ana River consists predominantly of effluent from municipal wastewater treatment plants upstream from the Orange County groundwater basin.31 Figure 6 illustrates these upstream wastewater discharges to the Santa Ana River.32 PFAS has recently been measured in the Santa Ana River at concentrations consistent with wells surrounding the recharge facilities, suggesting that historic concentrations of PFAS in the Santa Ana River may be a primary input of PFAS in the Orange County groundwater basin.33
Figure 6 - Wastewater Treatment Discharges to the Santa Ana River How Much PFAS is Found in the General Population?
Because of their widespread use and their persistence in the environment, many PFAS are found in the blood of people and animals all over the world.34 CDC scientists have measured PFAS in the blood serum (the clear portion of blood) of 98% of participants 30 “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), What are PFAS?” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_issues/programs/pfas/. 31 “UCI PFAS Health Study,” University of California, Irvine, accessed May 12, 2026, https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/.
32 National Water Research Institute, Report of the Scientific Advisory Panel: Orange County Water District’s Santa Ana River Water Quality and Health Study, Fountain Valley, CA, 2004, accessed April 14, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/wp-content/uploads/sarwqh-final-nwri-panel-report-2004.pdf. 33 Russ Detwiler, Reconstructing historical PFAS concentrations in groundwater using a reduced-order modeling framework. Alburquerque NM, InterPore2025, May 20, 2025, accessed April 16, 2026, https://events.interpore.org/event/56/contributions/7590/. 34 “PFAS Explained,” EPA.
City Council 8 – 22 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 17 of 62
aged 12 years and older since 1999, indicating widespread exposure to PFAS in the US population.35
Researchers at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) are participating in the CDC Multi-site Study (MSS).36 The MSS provides information to communities about the health effects of exposure to PFAS. The UCI MSS site is the area in Orange County, shown at Figure 7.
At the July 2025 MSS update, the
UCI researchers shared results
showing average levels of certain
PFAS chemicals in the blood of
adults who participated at the
Orange County study site. They
compared Orange County results
with other study locations and with
national averages. For adults at the
Orange County site, the average
blood levels were estimated to be
2.4 for PFOS, 1.2 for PFOA, 1.3 for
PFHxS, and 0.27 for PFNA
(measured in nanograms per
milliliter, ng/L) These levels were
lower than the averages seen
across all study sites. In addition, all
of these levels, except PFHxS, were
lower than the average levels found
in the general U.S. population. See
Figure 8 for the UCI MSS chart of
Average PFAS Levels in Blood.
37 On the chart, the Orange County
study site is labeled “CA.” Orange
County is the only California
location included in the study.
35 “PFAS Frequently Asked Questions,” SWRCB, 5, [8] CDC, “National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals,” 2019, accessed April 23, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf. 36 “Multi-site Study,” CDC, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-studies/multi-site-study.html. 37 “PFAS Multi-site Study (MSS), Virtual Open House,” CDC, ATSDR, July 28, 2025, accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/media/pdfs/2025/08/Open-House-Slides-508.pdf.
Source: CDC
Figure 7 - CDC Multi-site Study Site Orange
County, CA
City Council 8 – 23 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Source: CDC
Figure 8 - Average PFAS Levels in Blood, CDC Multi-site Study Virtual Open House, July 2025
Because of the phasing out of certain PFAS compounds, serum levels of PFOA and PFOS in the general population of the US have decreased dramatically in recent years.
According to the CDC, blood levels of both PFOS and PFOA have steadily decreased in US residents since 1999-2000.38
The half-life of PFAS in the human body is defined as the time required for the PFAS concentrations in serum or plasma to fall by half from the starting concentration.39 Thirteen studies conducted mainly in Europe and the US involving both general populations and exposed workers resulted in half-life estimates for PFOA of 2.73 years (range: 1.48 to 5.1 years), 4.70 years for PFOS (range: 1.69 to 5.7 years), and 5.31 years for PFHxS (range: 2.84 to 8.5 years).40 Based on that information, with no additional exposure, it could be anticipated that PFAS may be cleared from the body after an average of five years. However, PFAS exposures continue in general 38 “Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, Fast Facts: PFAS in the U.S. Population,” CDC, ATSDR, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/data-research/facts-stats/index.html. 39 Isabella Rosato, et al. “Estimation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) half-lives in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Environmental Research, Volume 242, February 1, 2024, 117743, accessed April 13, 2026,
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123025471. 40 Isabella Rosato, et al. “Estimation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) half-lives.” City Council 8 – 24 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 19 of 62
populations primarily through food and water despite production phase outs and regulatory interventions.
How Are People Exposed to PFAS?
There is general agreement that dietary intake is the largest source of PFAS exposure rather than inhalation or dermal contact.41 Direct exposures due to use in products can be quickly phased out by production phaseouts but exposures driven by PFAS accumulation in the environment, food chains, and contamination of groundwater and drinking water persist because of the continuing PFAS cycle. Human exposures to PFOS and PFOA, the two PFAS that are of greatest regulatory concern, have been declining due to regulatory interventions while understanding of their adverse effects on human health has been rapidly advancing. At the same time, a proliferation of new PFASs has rapidly replaced PFOS and PFOA with shorter chain length PFASs and new chemicals that are difficult to detect using standard methods.42 Emerging evidence from animal experiments suggests some of these alternative PFASs can be equally hazardous.43
41 Sunderland, “A review of the pathways of human exposure,” 136. 42 Sunderland, “A review of the pathways of human exposure,” 132. 43 Ibid.
City Council 8 – 25 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Source: EPA
Figure 9 - How are people exposed to PFAS?44
PFAS Exposure and Excretion
Exposure happens when a person breathes, eats, drinks, or touches a chemical and it enters their body. Excretion is the process whereby substances, like PFAS, leave the body. All PFAS can leave the body over time through urine, through menstrual blood or blood donation, or through breast milk. All of these factors could affect PFAS levels measured in blood.45 While PFAS blood test results can tell you the amount of certain PFAS in your blood, the test results will not provide information to pinpoint a health problem and will not predict future health outcomes. You can talk with your healthcare provider about the benefits and limitations of PFAS blood testing.46 44 “PFAS Explained,” EPA, 2, March 11, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-10/finalvirtual-pfas-explainer-508.pdf. 45 “Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, Preventing PFAS Exposure,” CDC, ATSDR, accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/prevent-exposure/your-body.html. 46 “Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, Testing for PFAS,” CDC, ATSDR, accessed April 17, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/blood-testing/index.html.
City Council 8 – 26 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 21 of 62
What are the Health Effects of Exposure?
Exposure to unsafe levels of PFOA/PFOS may result in adverse health effects including developmental effects to fetuses during pregnancy, cancer, liver effects, immune effects, thyroid effects, and other effects such as cholesterol changes.47 Laboratory studies in animals who were exposed to PFAS found links between the chemicals and increased cholesterol, changes in the body’s hormones, alterations of the immunologic system, decreased fertility, increased risk of cancer (especially kidney and testicular), low birth weight, delayed puberty onset, and birth defects. Since humans and animals react differently to PFAS, not all effects observed in animals may occur in humans. Although many epidemiology studies have examined the potential of PFAS to result in adverse health effects, most of the studies are cross-sectional in design and do not establish causality. Based on several factors outlined in the report of PFAS by the CDC including the consistency of findings across studies, the available epidemiology studies suggest associations between PFAS exposure and several health outcomes in humans.48
47 “PFAS Frequently Asked Questions,” SWRCB, 5, [6] A. M. Calafat, L.-Y. Wong, Z. Kuklenyik, J. A. Reidy, and L. L. Needham, “Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the US Population: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004 and Comparisons with NHANES 1999–2000,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1596 - 1602, Nov. 2007, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf. 48 “PFAS Frequently Asked Questions,” SWRCB, 8, [1] ATSDR, “Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls, Draft for Public Comment,” 2018, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf.
City Council 8 – 27 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Source: EPA
Figure 10 - Are PFAS Safe?49
PFAS Regulatory Requirements
Public drinking water systems are required to follow certain regulations to ensure that the water they serve to their customers is safe to drink.50 In recent years, specific regulations have been issued to address PFAS contamination that require monitoring and taking actions when PFAS is detected in drinking water sources. The following sections present PFAS regulations in the order they were issued by the EPA and California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB).
PFAS Monitoring Requirements
Monitoring refers to the collection and evaluation of data for contaminants that are suspected of being present in water. Samples are collected and analyzed according to EPA-approved laboratory methods. Monitoring results are reported to either the EPA or SWRCB. This data serves as a primary source of occurrence and exposure information used to develop regulatory decisions.
OCWD conducts all sampling and analyses and reporting of monitoring results to regulatory agencies on behalf of its member agencies. OCWD owns and operates its 49 “PFAS Explained,” EPA, 1, accessed March 11, 2026,
https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2023-10/final-virtual-pfas-explainer-508.pdf. 50 “Drinking Water Standards and Regulations: An Overview,” CDC, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/drinking-water/about/drinking-water-standards-and-regulations-an-overview.html.
City Council 8 – 28 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 23 of 62
own EPA-certified laboratory where it can use analytical methods approved by the EPA.
MWDOC member agencies conduct monitoring activities using either their own staff or contractors to collect samples, which are delivered to EPA-certified laboratories for analyses. Laboratories report the results of their analyses to each MWDOC water retailer, who then reports the results to either the EPA or SWRCB.
EPA Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule
EPA uses the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) to collect data every five years for no more than 30 priority contaminants that are suspected to be present in drinking water and do not have health-based standards set under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).51 The UCMR applies to all large public water systems (PWSs) serving greater than 10,000 people, all small PWSs serving between 3,300 and 10,000 people, and a representative sample of small PWSs serving fewer than 3,300 people.
EPA establishes the list of contaminants for each five-year UCMR cycle, considering an initial list of contaminants that are not regulated by the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations, are known or anticipated to occur at PWSs, and may warrant regulation under the SDWA.52
The SDWA Public Notification Rule ensures that consumers will receive notice if there is a risk to public health from their drinking water. The Public Notification Rule requires that all PWSs notify their customers of the availability of UCMR results no later than 12- months after results are known. CWS are required to report UCMR results in their Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) when unregulated contaminants are detected. The annual drinking water quality report must include notice of availability of unregulated contaminant monitoring results, the average of the year’s results and the range of detections.53
The Grand Jury obtained UCMR monitoring data for all sampling and analyses conducted to fulfill UCMR requirements for its member agencies. The highest PFAS detections for all OCWD sources during the UCMR 3 and UCMR 5 monitoring cycles are shown at Figure 11.
51 “Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” EPA.
52 “Learn About the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule,” EPA, accessed April 7, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/learn-about-unregulated-contaminant-monitoring-rule. 53 “Public Notification Rule,” EPA, accessed April 7, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/publicnotification-rule#rule-summary.
City Council 8 – 29 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Source: Compiled from OCWD data
Figure 11 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources During UCMR 3 and UCMR 5 Monitoring Cycles
California State Water Resources Control Board PFAS General Monitoring Orders Beginning in 2020, the SWRCB Division of Drinking Water, based on review of monitoring results from its 2019 PFAS monitoring orders, determined that it was necessary to expand monitoring to groundwater sources located within the vicinity of the PFAS detections. Several PFAS general monitoring orders were issued to PWSs 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2025 that included Orange County groundwater well locations.54 Each of the SWRCB PFAS monitoring orders included requirements for sample collection and laboratory analysis by specific dates, to be followed by monitoring conducted every calendar quarter thereafter.55 These PFAS monitoring orders established Consumer Confidence Report Detection Levels (CCRDL), and Notification and Response Levels for each PFAS chemical to be monitored. A list of the SWRCB PFAS monitoring orders and exhibits identifying groundwater sources required to be monitored are shown at Appendix A, as well as copies of the CCRDL for each monitoring order.
The Grand Jury obtained monitoring data for all sampling and analyses conducted to fulfill SWRCB monitoring order requirements for sources listed in the monitoring orders that are owned by their member agencies. The highest PFAS detections for all these OCWD sources are shown at Figure 12.
54 “PFAS DDW General Orders,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/. 55 Ibid.
EPA UCMR Number of PFAS on
UCMR Contaminants List
Maximum PFAS Detection
Among all OCWD Sources
2012-2016 UCMR 3 6 PFAS
Figure 20, Appendix A 70 ng/L
2022-2026 UCMR 5 29 PFAS
Figure 21, Appendix A 29 ng/L
City Council 8 – 30 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 25 of 62
1OCWD monitoring data as of March 19, 2026
2Outlier result. Next maximum PFAS result 88 ng/L
3Outlier result. Next maximum PFAS result 73.7 ng/L
Source: Compiled from OCWD data
Figure 12 - Highest PFAS Detections Among All OCWD Sources Listed on Each SWRCB Monitoring Order Exhibit A
2025 SWRCB General Order DW 2025-0002-DDW
The 2025 SWRCB General Order, issued on December 12, 2025, adopted the initial monitoring requirements in the federal PFAS Rule for each California CWS and nontransient, non-community water system. The 2025 SWRCB Order allows previously acquired data to count toward initial monitoring if collected on or after January 1, 2019, and reported concentrations no greater than the respective MCL.56 The 2025 SWRCB General Order also included a list of Orange County groundwater sources showing that 151 of the 198 listed sources had completed initial monitoring as required by the federal PFAS Rule.57
PFAS Notification and Response Requirements
Notification and response levels are health-based advisory levels established by the SWRCB Division of Drinking Water (DDW) for chemicals in drinking water that do not have established MCLs.
When chemicals are found in drinking water at concentrations greater than their notification levels, PWSs are required by law to make specific notifications. When 56 “ORDER DW 2025-0002-DDW,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/orderdw-2025-0002-ddw-pfas-initial-monitoring.pdf. 57 “Exhibit A – List of Sources and Required Monitoring Frequency,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.waterboards.ca.gov%2Fdrinkin g_water%2Fcertlic%2Fdrinkingwater%2Fpfas_ddw_general_order%2Fdocs%2Forder-dw-2025-0002- ddw-exhibit-a.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.
SWRCB Order Number of PFAS on
Order CCRDL
Selected
Monitoring Date
Range
Maximum PFAS Detection
Among All OCWD Sources
Listed on Order Exihibit A
2020-0003-DDW 18 PFAS
Figure 23, Appendix A 8/27/20 - 2/15/21 67.5 ng/L
2021-0003-DDW 18 PFAS
Figure 24, Appendix A 2/16/21 - 10/30/22 470 ng/L2
2022-0001-DDW 25 PFAS
Figure 25, Appendix A 10/31/22 - 4/24/24 169 ng/L3
2025-0002-DDW 25 PFAS
Figure 26, Appendix A 4/25/24 - 3/19/261
73.7 ng/L
City Council 8 – 31 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
chemicals are found in drinking water at concentrations greater than their response levels, DDW recommends removal of a drinking water source from service.58 PFAS notification and response levels specified in CCRDLs attached to SWRCB general monitoring orders remain in effect until MCLs are established and become effective. For example, MCLs for specific PFAS will become effective in 2029, and at that time will supersede notification and response levels specified the 2022 CCRDL.
PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation
In April 2024 EPA announced the final National Primary Drinking Water Regulation for six PFAS (the federal PFAS Rule).59 The PFAS Rule applies to all CWS. The EPA expects that over many years this rule will prevent PFAS exposure in drinking for approximately 100 million people, prevent thousands of deaths, and reduce tens of thousands of serious PFAs-attributable illnesses.60
The PFAS Rule establishes initial monitoring and compliance monitoring requirements, and enforceable maximum contaminant levels (MCL) for six PFAS in drinking water.
Initial monitoring for six listed PFAS must be implemented beginning April 2024 and must be completed no later than April 26, 2027. Compliance monitoring requirements beginning April 26, 2027, will be either triennial, annual, or quarterly as determined by the SWRCB based on results of the initial monitoring.
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) is the highest level of a contaminant allowed in drinking water. EPA has established legally enforceable MCLs of 4.0 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA and PFOS, and 10.0 ppt for PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA (GenX chemicals). Figure 13 shows the MCLs and MCLG effective April 26, 2029.
Ensuring compliance with drinking water MCLs for the PFAS of most concern is the reason over $600 million (see Figure 17) is being spent to construct PFAS treatment facilities in Orange County.
58 “Drinking Water Notification Levels,” SWRCB, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/NotificationLevels.html. 59 “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation,” EPA, accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas. 60 Ibid.
City Council 8 – 32 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 27 of 62
Source: EPA
Figure 13 - PFAS Rule Enforceable Maximum Contaminant Levels and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals61
In addition to ongoing compliance monitoring and MCLs, the PFAS Rule also includes additional requirements with future effective dates. Between April 2027 and April 2029, if monitoring shows that drinking water levels exceed MCLs, CWS must implement solutions that reduce these PFAS; results of initial monitoring must be included in the CCR; results of compliance monitoring must be included in the CCR; and public notification is required for monitoring and testing violations. Starting April 2029, CWS that have MCL violations must take action to reduce levels of these PFAS in their drinking water, and public notification is required for MCL violations.
Compliance with Regulatory Requirements
Consumer Confidence Reports
The Grand Jury reviewed the 2025 Consumer Confidence Reports (Water Quality Reports) issued by 31 water retailers serving Orange County. The CCR is to be delivered to all billing customers by July 1 of each year and must include specified information. All 31 water retailers complied with the eight content requirements specified by the EPA, shown in Appendix B.62 Seven of the 11 water retailers operating PFAS 61 “PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation, April 2024,” EPA, accessed May 12, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2024-04/pfas-npdwr_fact-sheet_general_4.9.24v1.pdf. 62 “Consumer Confidence Report Rule: A Quick Reference Guide,” EPA, accessed April 18, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-05/documents/guide_qrg_ccr_2011.pdf.
City Council 8 – 33 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
treatment facilities in Orange County included a PFAS advisory section in their CCRs, while only 55 percent of the 31 water retailers included any PFAS advisory statement.
The Grand Jury found that the 31 Orange County water retailers reported either “not detected” results or concentrations below notification thresholds for the six PFAS listed in the EPA PFAS Rule on their 2025 CCRs. After PFAS treatment facilities became operational, OCWD member retailers operating these facilities consistently reported “not detected” results for the same six PFAS. The Grand Jury found that PFAS results from individual wells do not necessarily reflect the quality of water delivered to customers, as some tested wells were later placed into inactive status or destroyed. CCRs documented PFAS constituents exceeding notification levels as required and did not report “not detected” results for those constituents. Monitoring results and CCRs are available in the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), California’s official database for tracking public water systems, drinking water quality monitoring, regulatory compliance, and enforcement.63
Notification and Response
As of 2020, drinking water retailers with PFAS detections above notification and response levels at wells without PFAS treatment facilities began to rely on imported water, or groundwater blended with imported water to deliver drinking water with PFAS concentrations below notification and response levels. As of 2021, multiple water retailers in Orange County shut down groundwater wells after PFAS concentrations at those wells exceeded established response levels.64
PFAS Rule Initial Monitoring
When the 2025 SWRCB General Order adopting the PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation was issued in December 2025, 76% of listed Orange County groundwater sources had already completed initial monitoring required to be completed by April 2027. Most of the remaining Orange County sources received credit for previously acquired data, leaving only 6% with all requirements to be completed by April 2027.
63 “Drinking Water Watch,” SWRCB, Division of Drinking Water, Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS), accessed April 26, 2026, https://sdwis.waterboards.ca.gov/PDWW/. 64 “Orange County launches first water plant to remove PFAS toxins,” Solano Public Health, accessed April 29, 2026,
https://publichealth.networkofcare.org/solano/CommunityResources/News/Article?articleId=124536.
City Council 8 – 34 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 29 of 62
Proactive Response to PFAS Impacts
PFAS Impacts and OCWD Response
OCWD coordinated a regional response to PFAS contamination in partnership with its member agencies. These efforts focus on restoring the groundwater basin, which supplies up to 85 percent of the water used by approximately 2.5 million residents in north and central Orange County. A timeline of OCWD response to PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin is shown in Figure 14. As PFAS-impacted groundwater wells began to be shut down in early 2020, public education became a critical component of community water systems’ response. OCWD dedicated resources to public outreach, including the development of informational web pages to inform the public about PFAS impacts and the measures being implemented to address them.65 Source: Compiled from multiple OCWD sources
Figure 14 - Timeline of OCWD Response to PFAS in the Santa Ana River Basin PFAS contamination has impacted more than 100 groundwater wells across 15 water retailers. As of this report, 53 wells have returned to service following construction of treatment facilities. Figure 15 shows a map of current and future PFAS treatment locations in Orange County.
65 “PFAS education center,” Orange County Water District, accessed April 8, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/water-quality/pfas/.
City Council 8 – 35 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Figure 15 - Map of Current and Future PFAS Treatment Locations PFAS Treatment Facilities and Capital Costs
Construction of PFAS treatment facilities began in 2020. OCWD executed the PFAS Treatment Facilities and Program Agreement, under which OCWD funds capital costs and shares operating and maintenance (O&M) costs with participating water retailers.
Figure 16 summarizes projected PFAS capital funding sources as of January 2026, including OCWD pay-as-you-go (PAYGO) revenue, state and federal grants, an EPA Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan, and litigation settlement proceeds. The Grand Jury commends OCWD for securing diversified funding sources to advance timely treatment facility construction.
City Council 8 – 36 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 31 of 62
Source: OCWD data
Figure 16 - Approximate PFAS Capital Funding Sources
Figure 17 summarizes PFAS treatment facilities by water retailer, opening date, treatment technology, capacity, location, connections, number of wells, and capital costs. Facilities began entering service in mid-2021, starting with a treatment plant in Fullerton, with additional facilities becoming operational over time. Most facilities use ion exchange technology. Capital costs vary based on the number of affected wells, conveyance pipeline requirements, and treatment facility configuration.
OCWD is funding the reasonable costs of designing and constructing PFAS treatment facilities for its member water retailers. Each retailer could either have OCWD design and build the treatment facility or receive reimbursement for designing and constructing the treatment system independently. As of this report, 38 wells with PFAS treatment were built by OCWD and fifteen wells with PFAS treatment were designed and built by the water retailers.
Eighteen wells with PFAS treatment construction projects by OCWD have been completed on schedule. Ten wells with PFAS treatment projects, which were built by OCWD, were completed on schedule; however, OCWD experienced cost overruns due to specialized design requirements or owner-requested improvements. An additional 10 wells with PFAS treatment projects that were done by OCWD were completed late and over budget, primarily due to pandemic-related material delays, design complexity, owner-requested improvements, and utility coordination challenges.
City Council 8 – 37 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Source: Multiple OCWD and water retailer data
Figure 17 - Summary of PFAS Treatment Facilities
Community Water System
Opening
Date Type Capacity Location Connections Wells
Total Cost
($M)
Actual-to
Date ($M)
Remaining
Budget ($M)
Sep-2024 Ion Exchange 51,000 gal/min
Nine (9) PFAS treatment facilities
at Linda Vista, Katella Ave., Santa
Cruz, Energy Field, Brookhurst,
Willow Park, Downtown, Boysen
Park, and La Palma
14 $117.1 $117.1 $0.0
Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 8,000 gal/min Wells 48 & 53 2 $16.0 $0.8 $15.3 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 8,000 gal/min Wells 39 & 47 2 $16.0 $0.9 $15.1 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange TBD Well 51 1 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0
City of Buena Park Jun-2026 Packer 2,200 gal/min
Linden Well - Install Packer to
reduce flow from PFAS zone(s) in
the well - not treatment.
1 $0.6 $0.1 $0.6
Jun-2021 Ion Exchange 2,400 gal/min Kimberly Well 1A 1 $5.3 $4.1 $1.3 Dec-2023
Granular
Activated
Carbon (GAC)
5,000 gal/min Main Plant 3A 1 $13.7 $13.7 $0.0
Dec-2026
Granular
Activated
Carbon (GAC)
4,000 gal/min Main Plant Wells 5,6,7,8 4 $12.5 $2.6 $9.9 Jun-2027 Ion Exchange 4,400 gal/min Kimberly Well 2 1 $10.9 $4.3 $6.6 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 1,600 gal/min
Sunclipse Well 10 - Pipeline for
Treatment at Kimberly 2 Plant
Well 15 - New Well Site Needed
2 $15.3 $0.0 $15.3
Jun-2023 Ion Exchange 17,600 gal/min Wells 21, 23, 28, 29, 30, 31 6 $24.3 $24.3 $0.0 Dec-2026 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Well 19 1 $6.5 $1.9 $4.7 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 13,590 gal/min Wells 22, 26, and 27 3 $31.7 $1.6 $30.2 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Well 25 1 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 3,000 gal/min Well 3A 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 3,000 gal/min Well 6 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Sep-2022 Ion Exchange 8,420 gal/min Wells 9, 19, 23, 24 4 $10.0 $9.9 $0.1 Apr-2026 Ion Exchange 7,940 gal/min Wells 20, 21, 22 3 $14.7 $14.7 $0.0 Apr-2026 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Well 28 1 $5.0 $4.0 $1.0 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 5,500 gal/min Wells 25, 27 2 $13.0 $0.4 $12.7 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Well 26 1 $7.0 $0.1 $6.9 Dec-2029 Ion Exchange TBD Well 29 - New Well Currently Being Drilled by City 1 $6.0 $1.0 $5.0
May-2023 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Well 40 1 $5.8 $5.8 $0.0 Sep-2026 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Well 38 1 $7.4 $7.4 $0.0 Dec-2026 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Well 31 1 $8.5 $6.8 $1.7 Apr-2027 Ion Exchange 3,600 gal/min Well 27&28 2 $17.0 $8.7 $8.3 May-2027 Ion Exchange 9,200 gal/min Wells 27, 28, 31, 38, 40 at John Garthe Reservoir 5 $31.4 $0.0 $31.4
Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 12,400 gal/min Wells 16, 29, 33, 41, 43(fut) at Walnut Reservoir 5 $25.0 $0.1 $24.9
May-2025 Ion Exchange 6,400 gal/min
Main Street and Prospect Avenue
to remove PFAS from four (4) wells
in Tustin
4 $32.7 $32.7 $0.0
Dec-2029 Ion Exchange 2,000 gal/min Edinger Well 1 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,300 gal/min 17th St Wells (2 wells treated) 2 $7.0 $0.0 $7.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min WM-3 (New Well) 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min WM-SC4 (New Well) 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 East Orange County Water
District Jun-2024 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Treatment for East and VanderWerff Wells 19,000 2 $8.9 $8.9 $0.0 Nov-2023 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Bradford and Fairhaven Plants 3 $4.4 $4.4 $0.0 Jul-2027 Ion Exchange 940 gal/min Sherrill Plant 1 $3.1 $0.8 $2.4 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 7,620 gal/min La Jolla, Fern Plants 3 $8.3 $0.5 $7.8 Dec-2028 Ion Exchange 7,620 gal/min Clair, Beach, and Dale Plants 4 $12.8 $0.9 $11.9 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Lowden 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Dec-2030 Ion Exchange 2,500 gal/min Orangewood 1 $8.0 $0.0 $8.0 Irvine Ranch Water District Oct-2024 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Orange Park Acres Well No. 1 125,000 1 $7.2 $7.2 $0.0 Serrano Water District Feb-2022 Ion Exchange 3,200 gal/min Wells 3 and 5 5,659 2 $6.0 $6.0 $0.0 Yorba Linda Water District Dec-2021 Ion Exchange 13,200 gal/min All ten (10) Yorba Linda wells 11,786 10 $27.7 $27.7 $0.0 Note: $M = Dollars in Millions 106 $607.8 $318.9 $288.9 City of Anaheim
City of Tustin 14,500
64,000
City of Fullerton 32,000
Golden State Water
Company
City of Garden Grove 34,300
City of Orange
46,300
36,000
City of Santa Ana 45,576
City of Westminster
City of Huntington Beach
City Council 8 – 38 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 33 of 62
Operations and Maintenance Costs
Under the PFAS Treatment Facilities and Program Agreement, OCWD reimburses 50 percent of eligible operations and maintenance (O&M) costs incurred by participating water agencies. Eligible O&M costs include treatment media replacement, power and chemical costs, routine maintenance, repairs, staffing, compliance monitoring, regulatory compliance activities, additional pumping, waste disposal, sewer costs, and other necessary system maintenance expenses.
Actual PFAS treatment expenses (see Figure 18), which can be found in Annual Comprehensive Financial Reports (ACFRs),66 varied primarily due to construction timing and the performance of ion exchange resin media. Specialized resins are a key element in PFAS treatment and help remove PFAS from water using electrostatics. Construction delays meant some treatment facilities were not operational as expected, resulting in lower O&M costs. In FY22 and FY23, initial resin media lasted longer than anticipated and reduced O&M costs. In contrast, FY25 experienced more resin changeouts than anticipated and higher O&M costs. Resin media life varies by treatment system and operating conditions, such as run time, cycling frequency, and production flow rates.
OCWD is updating resin performance assumptions and changeout frequency estimates to improve future O&M forecasts.
Source: OCWD
Figure 18 – OCWD’s Share of PFAS Treatment Facility Annual O&M Cost Program Status and Future Plans
The overall OCWD PFAS Treatment Systems Project currently includes 11 water retailers, with construction planned or underway for four additional retailers, expanding the program to 15. Fifty-three treatment systems are operational. Construction 66 “Sound financial management,” Orange County Water District, accessed April 8, 2026, https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/sound-financial-management/. $-
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25
City Council 8 – 39 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
continues on 20 additional systems, with design work underway for 24 more. Here is a list of PFAS projects in design or under construction as of May 2026:
Golden State Water Company Wells SLON and SORG are still in planning. Well SSYC is in design and is anticipated to start construction in Fiscal Year 26/27. Tustin 17th Street Well is nearing the start of design. Huntington Beach Well 3A, Anaheim Wells 39 and 47, Tustin Edinger Well are all in the design phase and are anticipated to start construction in Fiscal Year 26/27. Buena Park Linden Well is currently in construction.
Figure 19 indicates the estimated average monthly cost of PFAS treatment to OCWD service area residents is $1.42 per person. OCWD anticipates continued design and construction activity over several years.
Source: OCWD
Figure 19 - PFAS Monthly Cost to OCWD Service Area Residents
Total Capital Costs $570,000,000
State & Fed Grants $152,000,000
Litigation Proceeds $121,000,000
Net Capital Costs $297,000,000
Amortized Debt Costs
4.50% Interest Rate
25 Years
$297,000,000 Amount
Annual Debt Payment $20,029,391
Estimated Annual O&M Cost $22,000,000
Total Annual Cost $42,029,391
Total Monthly Cost $3,502,449
OCWD Population from 19
Member Agencies 2,469,000 persons
Monthly cost per person $1.42
Average PFAS Impact to OCWD Service Area Residents
Over a 25 year period
City Council 8 – 40 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 35 of 62
FINDINGS
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the findings presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.
Based on its investigation described herein, the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury has arrived at the following six principal findings:
F1 Commercial and industrial chemical manufacturers are a major source of PFAS contamination. Settlement litigation funds are available for community water systems to make claims.
F2 PFAS is widespread, and contamination has been detected in Orange County groundwater sources. Community water systems are required to report PFAS monitoring results in their annual Consumer Confidence Reports.
F3 PFAS exposure is associated with potential adverse human health effects.
F4 OCWD has taken a proactive leadership role in addressing PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, though PFAS treatment implementation varies across local cities and water districts.
F5 Groundwater supplies must either be treated to remove PFAS or must be replaced with imported water supplies that are significantly more expensive than groundwater. Over $500 million is being spent on construction, operations, and maintenance of PFAS treatment facilities in Orange County.
F6 Orange County drinking water meets or exceeds state and federal standards and is safe for consumption without additional home filtration.
F7 Research on newer PFAS compounds and long-term exposure effects is ongoing.
F8 There are limited online PFAS education and outreach programs among Orange County water retailers. Most retailers rely on OCWD for PFAS education and outreach. PFAS advisories were included in approximately 55% of the Orange County water retailers’ annual water quality reports in 2025.
City Council 8 – 41 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
RECOMMENDATIONS
In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the recommendations presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court.
Based on its investigation described herein, the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury makes the following recommendations:
R1 By September 30, 2026, Orange County Water District (OCWD), in coordination with state and federal agencies, should pursue cost recovery efforts against PFAS manufacturers to offset treatment, monitoring, and long-term remediation costs incurred by local water agencies and ratepayers. [F1, F5] R2 By July 1, 2029, OCWD and its member agencies should monitor PFAS in groundwater and surface water sources and promptly implement PFAS treatment when response levels are exceeded. [F2, F4]
R3 By September 30, 2026, OCWD, in collaboration with the Orange County Health Care Agency, should update public education and guidance continually as scientific understanding and regulatory standards evolve. [F3] R4 By July 1, 2029, all Orange County water retailers should consistently include a PFAS advisory, treatment facilities status, and compliance information in consumer confidence reports and on agency websites, using clear and understandable language for the public. [F2, F8]
R5 By September 30, 2026, OCWD and all Orange County water retailers should enhance coordinated public education efforts to reassure their customers about drinking water safety. [F6, F8]
R6 By September 30, 2026, OCWD should continuously monitor national and international PFAS research developments and incorporate new findings into future groundwater management, treatment planning, and regulatory compliance strategies. [F7]
City Council 8 – 42 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 37 of 62
COMMENDATIONS
Many Orange County water agencies have demonstrated exceptional leadership in addressing PFAS through large-scale treatment investments, rigorous monitoring, and public communication. Together, these agencies serve more than two million residents and have implemented some of the most advanced PFAS treatment systems in the nation. The following commendations recognize high-impact programs and measurable achievements across the region.
Orange County Water District (OCWD)
OCWD has implemented the largest PFAS treatment program in the United States, designing and constructing treatment systems for over 100 impacted wells across 15 cities and retail water districts, improving water quality for approximately 1.5 million people. OCWD secured a $94M EPA Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan, $152M in state and federal grant funding, and $131M in PFAS manufacturers litigation settlement funds to support this effort, which includes the build-out of more than 30 PFAS treatment facilities.
The Grand Jury offers additional commendations to OCWD and its member agencies for their collaborative cost-sharing agreement. Under this arrangement, OCWD fully funds all PFAS facility design and construction capital expenditures. Ongoing operations and maintenance costs are then shared equally, with OCWD covering 50% and each participating water retailer contributing the remaining 50% for the PFAS treatment facilities they operate. This approach reflects progressive public-sector planning, demonstrating how agencies can work together to address complex and costly challenges. It also serves as a strong model for future government/private-sector cost-sharing agreements, illustrating how thoughtful collaboration can enhance efficiency and long-term public benefit.
Anaheim Water Utility
Anaheim has launched one of the largest municipal PFAS treatment programs in the country, a multi-phase, $150M effort to construct treatment systems at nine groundwater sites. The utility serves 64,000 metered customers, historically relying on groundwater for 80% of its supply. PFAS treatment systems for Wells 39 and 47 are among the first in a series of facilities designed to restore local production while meeting stringent state and federal standards.
City Council 8 – 43 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Yorba Linda Water District (YLWD)
YLWD operates the J. Wayne Miller, Ph.D. Water Treatment Plant, recognized as the nation’s largest PFAS ion-exchange treatment facility. The plant serves approximately 80,000 customers and has delivered PFAS-free water for nearly three consecutive years. This facility allows YLWD to optimize its groundwater resources while proactively meeting evolving PFAS regulatory standards.
City Council 8 – 44 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 39 of 62
RESPONSES
The following excerpts from the California Penal Code provide the requirements for public agencies to respond to the Findings and Recommendations of this Grand Jury report:
§933
(c) No later than 90 days after the grand jury submits a final report on the operations of any public agency subject to its reviewing authority, the governing body of the public agency shall comment to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body, and every elected county officer or agency head for which the grand jury has responsibility pursuant to Section 914.1 shall comment within 60 days to the presiding judge of the superior court, with an information copy sent to the board of supervisors, on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of that county officer or agency head and any agency or agencies which that officer or agency head supervises or controls. In any city and county, the mayor shall also comment on the findings and recommendations. All of these comments and reports shall forthwith be submitted to the presiding judge of the superior court who impaneled the grand jury. A copy of all responses to grand jury reports shall be placed on file with the clerk of the public agency and the office of the county clerk, or the mayor when applicable, and shall remain on file in those offices. One copy shall be placed on file with the applicable grand jury final report by, and in the control of the currently impaneled grand jury, where it shall be maintained for a minimum of five years.
§933.05.
(a) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following:
(1) The respondent agrees with the finding.
(2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons, therefore.
(b) For purposes of subdivision (b) of Section 933, as to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions:
City Council 8 – 45 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
(1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action.
(2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a timeframe for implementation.
(3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a timeframe for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This timeframe shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report.
(4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation, therefore.
(c) However, if a finding or recommendation of the grand jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the board of supervisors shall respond if requested by the grand jury, but the response of the board of supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision-making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. (d) A grand jury may request a subject person or entity to come before the grand jury for the purpose of reading and discussing the findings of the grand jury report that relates to that person or entity in order to verify the accuracy of the findings prior to their release.
(e) During an investigation, the grand jury shall meet with the subject of that investigation regarding the investigation, unless the court, either on its own determination or upon request of the foreperson of the grand jury, determines that such a meeting would be detrimental.
(f) A grand jury shall provide to the affected agency a copy of the portion of the grand jury report relating to that person or entity two working days prior to its public release and after the approval of the presiding judge. No officer, agency, department, or governing body of a public agency shall disclose any contents of the report prior to the public release of the final report.
(Amended by Stats. 1997, Ch. 443, Sec. 5. Effective January 1, 1998.) Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with Penal Code §933.05 are required from:
City Council 8 – 46 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 41 of 62
Orange County Board of Supervisors 90 Day Response Required Findings: F3
Recommendations: R3
Orange County Water District Board of Directors 90 Day Response Required Findings: F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8
Recommendations: R1, R2, R3, R5, R6
Orange County Health Care Agency 90 Day Response Requested Findings: F3
Recommendations: R3
City of Anaheim 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Brea 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
City of Buena Park 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Fountain Valley 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City Council 8 – 47 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
City of Fullerton 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Garden Grove 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Huntington Beach 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of La Habra 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
City of La Palma 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Newport Beach 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Orange 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City Council 8 – 48 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 43 of 62
City of San Clemente 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
City of Santa Ana 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Seal Beach 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Tustin 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City of Westminster 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
East Orange County Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
El Toro Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
City Council 8 – 49 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Emerald Bay Service District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
Golden State Water Company 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
Irvine Ranch Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
Laguna Beach County Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
Mesa Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
Moulton Niguel Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
Santa Margarita Water District 90 Day Response Required Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
City Council 8 – 50 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 45 of 62
Serrano Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
South Coast Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
Trabuco Canyon Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F6, F8
Recommendations: R4, R5
Yorba Linda Water District 90 Day Response Required
Findings: F2, F4, F6, F8
Recommendations: R2, R4, R5
City Council 8 – 51 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Acronyms
ACFRS Annual comprehensive financial reports
ADONA Ammonium 4 8-dioxa-3h-perfluorononanoate
AFFF Aqueous film forming foams used frequently at airports and military bases for firefighting and emergency response training activities AL Regulatory Action Level The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow
ATSDR Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
CCR Consumer Confidence Report
CCRDL Consumer Confidence Report Detection Levels
CDC United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CWS Community Water System
DDW Division of Drinking Water
DWR Department of Water Resources
Effluent Liquid waste from industrial facilities
EPA US Environmental Protection Agency
FDA Food and Drug Administration
GenX Is a Chemours trademark name for a synthetic, short chain organofluorine chemical compound, the ammonium
salt of hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA). It can also be used more informally to refer to the group of related fluorochemicals that are used to produce GenX.
GWRS Ground water replacement system
HALF LIFE Time required for a quantity to reduce to half of its original value HFPO-DA Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid
MSS Multi site study
MCL Glossary of Terms Maximum Contaminant Level. The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as City Council 8 – 52 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 47 of 62
close to the public health goals and maximum contaminant level goals as is economically and technologically feasible. Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.
MCLG Maximum Contaminant Level Goal. The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) sets maximum contaminant level goals.
MRDL Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level. The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that the addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
MRDLG Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health.
MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
MWD Metropolitan Water District
MWDOC Municipal Water District of Orange County
N/A Not applicable
ND Not detected
NHANES National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey NL California Notification Level Non-regulatory, health-based advisory levels established by the State Board for contaminants in drinking water for which an MCL has not been established
NR Not required to be tested; < = average is less than the detection limit for reporting purposes
NTU Nephelometric turbidity units
OCWD Orange County Water District
O & M Operations and Management
PAYGO “Pay as you go”
PDWS Primary Drinking Water Standard MCLs, MRDLs and treatment techniques (TTs) for contaminants that affect health, along with their monitoring and reporting requirements
pCi/L picoCuries per liter
City Council 8 – 53 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
PFAS RULE Establishes enforceable drinking water standards for six PFAS chemicals PFAS Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
PFBA Perfluoro Butanoic Acid
PFBS Perfluoro Butane Sulfonic Acid
PFHpA Perfluoro Heptanoic Acid
PFHxA Perfluoro Hexanoic Acid
PFHxS Perfluoro Hexane Sulfonic Acid
PFNA Perfluorononanoic acid
PFOA Perfluoro Octanoic Acid
PFOS Perfluoro Octane Sulfonic Acid
PFPeA Perfluoro Pentanoic Acid
PHG Public Health Goal The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. The California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) sets public health goals.
PPB Parts per billion
PPM Parts per million
PPT Parts per trillion
PQL Practical Quantitation Level
PWS Public water supply
RAA Highest Running Annual Average
SAR Santa Ana River
SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
SDWIS Safe Drinking Water Information System
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
WIFIA Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act
TT Treatment Technique. A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water
UCI University of California, Irvine
City Council 8 – 54 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 49 of 62
UCMR Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule
US United States
µmho/cm Micromho per centimeter (equivalent to 1 microsiemens/cm)
City Council 8 – 55 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Glossary
Cross Sectional Study Examines prevalence of a condition or characteristic at a single point in time across a population to identify patterns, associations, and risk factors
Ion Exchange Technology Process that removes/replaces dissolved ions in a solution using solid materials.
Non-Community Water Systems Public water systems at locations where people do not reside
Non-Transient Water Systems Public water systems that service at least 25 of the same people over six months of the year, but do not
live there
City Council 8 – 56 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 51 of 62
Bibliography
California Department of Water Resources. “California’s Groundwater Live: Well Infrastructure.” Accessed April 13, 2026.
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/f2b252d15a0d4e49887ba94ac17cc4bb.
CAL FIRE. “SB-1044 Compliance: Phasing Out PFAS in Class B Firefighting Foam.” Accessed April 17, 2026. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/what-we-do/pipeline-safety-andcupa/fire-fighting-equipment-and-foam-pfas California Health and Safety Code Division 104 Part 12 Chapter 4 California Safe Drinking Water Act Section 116275. Accessed March 30, 2026. https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-hsc/division-104/part-12/chapter-4/article1/section-116275/.
California State Water Resources Control Board. “PFAS Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.” Accessed April 18, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas.
California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water. Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS). “Drinking Water Watch.” Accessed April 26, 2026. https://sdwis.waterboards.ca.gov/PDWW/.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “Drinking Water Standards and Regulations: An Overview,” Accessed May 21, 2026, https://www.cdc.gov/drinkingwater/about/drinking-water-standards-and-regulations-an-overview.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. NHANES 2017-18 Overview.” Accessed April 16, 2026. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/default.aspx?BeginYear=2017.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health, “Fast Facts: PFAS in the U.S. Population,” Accessed April 16, 2026, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/data-research/facts-stats/index.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health. “Multi-site Study.” Accessed April 16, 2026. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/health-studies/multi-site-study.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health. “Preventing PFAS Exposure.” Accessed April 16, 2026. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/prevent-exposure/your-body.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. Per- and Polyfluoralkyl Substances (PFAS) and Your Health. “Testing for PFAS.” Accessed April 17, 2026. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/pfas/blood-testing/index.html.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention ATSDR. “PFAS Multi-site Study (MSS) Virtual Open House.” July 28, 2025.
https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/media/pdfs/2025/08/Open-House-Slides-508.pdf.
City Council 8 – 57 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Detwiler, Russ. “Reconstructing historical PFAS concentrations in groundwater using a reduced-order modeling framework.” Alburquerque NM, InterPore2025. May 20, 2025.
Accessed April 16, 2026. https://events.interpore.org/event/56/contributions/7590/.
EcoPulse. “Understanding the PFAS Cycle.” Accessed April 13, 2026. https://www.ecopulsenow.com/insights/understanding-the-pfas-cycle.
Happy Family [Cover page, top row, right image of family] – Happy Family Enjoying Fresh Water Together at Home. Concept drink of clear water. Stock Photo | Adobe Stock
Lab Glass [Cover page, middle row, right image of chemical lab glass] - Blue laboratory Images - Free Download on Magnific (formerly Freepik), 2026 National Water Research Institute. Report of the Scientific Advisory Panel: Orange County Water District’s Santa Ana River Water Quality and Health Study. Fountain Valley, CA, 2004. Accessed April 14, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/wpcontent/uploads/sarwqh-final-nwri-panel-report-2004.pdf.
Orange County Grand Jury (2025 – 2026). [Cover page, bottom row image of Yorba Linda Water District PFAS Treatment Facility]. Photograph. August 27, 2025.
Unpublished internal documentation.
Orange County Water District. “How water works in Orange County.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/learning-center/how-water-works-in-oc/.
Orange County Water District. “PFAS education center.” Accessed April 8, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/water-quality/pfas/.
Orange County Water District. “Sound financial management.” Accessed April 8, 2026. https://www.ocwd.com/what-we-do/sound-financial-management/.
Pitcher Pouring [Cover page, top row, left image] - Pouring Water into a Glass - Refreshment and Hydration Concept on Wooden Table. 76812373 Stock Photo at Vecteezy, 2026
Rosato, Isabelle, et al. “Estimation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) halflives in human studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Environmental Research. Volume 242. 1 February 2024, 117743. Accessed April 13, 2026. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935123025471?via%3Dihub.
Solano Public Health. “Orange County launches first water plant to remove PFAS toxins.” Accessed April 29, 2026. Orange County launches first water plant to remove PFAS toxins.
Steenland, Kyle, Fletcher, Tony, and Savitz, David A. “Epidemiologic Evidence on the Health Effects of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA).” National Library of Medicine.
Accessed May 12, 2026. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2920088/.
Stricklin Tommy, Magnifying Glass [Cover page middle row, left image of magnifying glass] – What Is TDS in Drinking Water? Levels, Testing & Solutions | SpringWell, 2026 City Council 8 – 58 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 53 of 62
Sunderland, Elsie M, et al. “A review of the pathways of human exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and present understanding of health effects.” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology. 3 November 2018. Accessed March 16, 2026. https://sunderlandlab.org/assets/sunderland_jeseerev_2018wsi.pdf.
SWRCB. “Drinking Water Notification Levels.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/NotificationLevels.h tml.
SWRCB. “Exhibit A – List of Sources and Required Monitoring Frequency.” Accessed May 21, 2026.
https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.waterboards. ca.gov%2Fdrinking_water%2Fcertlic%2Fdrinkingwater%2Fpfas_ddw_general_order%2 Fdocs%2Forder-dw-2025-0002-ddw-exhibit-a.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK.
SWRCB. “ORDER DW 2025-0002-DDW.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general _order/docs/order-dw-2025-0002-ddw-pfas-initial-monitoring.pdf.
SWRCB. “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions,” 5. [3] 3M Company, “Fluorochemical use, distribution and release overview.,” AR226-0550, 1999. updated March 19, 2020.
Accessed March 25, 2026.
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf.
SWRCB. “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions.” 5. [6] A. M. Calafat, L.-Y. Wong, Z.
Kuklenyik, J. A. Reidy, and L. L. Needham, “Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals in the US Population: Data from the National Health and Nutriti Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004 and Comparisons with NHANES 1999–2000,” Environ. Health Perspect., vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1596– 1602, Nov. 2007.
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf.
SWRCB. “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions,” 5. [8] CDC, “National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals,” 2019. Accessed April 23, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf.
SWRCB, “PFAS - Frequently Asked Questions.” 8. [1] Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), “Toxicological Profile for Perfluoroalkyls, Draft for Public Comment,” 2018. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/pfas/docs/master_pfas_faq_mar.pdf.
SWRCB. “PFAS DDW General Orders.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas_ddw_general _order/.
SWRCB. “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), What are PFAS?” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_issues/programs/pfas/.
Temkin, Alexis and Subramaniam, Varun. “’Forever chemicals’ contaminate nearly 40% of non-organic California-grown produce.” Environmental Working Group. Accessed April 6, 2026. https://www.ewg.org/research/forever-chemicals-contaminate-nearly-40- non-organic-california-grown-produce.
City Council 8 – 59 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
University of California, Irvine. “UCI PFAS Health Study.” Accessed May 12, 2026. https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/.
University of California, Irvine. “UCI PFAS Health Study, Frequently Asked Questions.” Accessed May 12, 2026. https://sites.uci.edu/pfas/frequently-asked-questions/.
University of California, Irvine, Wen School of Population & Public Health. “The ‘Forever Chemical’ Detective.” February 12, 2026. Accessed May 12, 2026. https://publichealth.uci.edu/2026/02/12/the-forever-chemical-detective/.
United States EPA. “Consumer Confidence Report Rule: A Quick Reference Guide.” Accessed April 18, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014- 05/documents/guide_qrg_ccr_2011.pdf.
United States EPA. “Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO). Facility Search – Enforcement and Compliance Data.” Accessed April 26, 2026. https://echo.epa.gov/facilities/facility-search.
United States EPA. “Learn About the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule.” Accessed April 7, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/dwucmr/learn-about-unregulatedcontaminant-monitoring-rule.
United States EPA. “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).” Accessed April 18, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/pfas.
United States EPA. “Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation.” Accessed May 12, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas.
United States EPA. “PFAS Explained.” Accessed March 11, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/pfas/pfas-explained.
United States EPA. “Public Notification Rule.” Accessed April 7, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/public-notification-rule#rule-summary.
United States EPA. “Risk Management for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) under TSCA.” Accessed May 21, 2026. https://www.epa.gov/assessing-and-managingchemicals-under-tsca/risk-management-and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas.
United States EPA. “Summary of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” describing statutory authority at 42 U.S.C. § 300f et seq., Accessed My 21, 2026, https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/summary-safe-drinking-water-act.
Zimmerman Janet, Santa Ana River [Cover page top row, center image], Water agencies pledge cooperation to help the Santa Ana River – Orange County Register, published September 20, 2014
City Council 8 – 60 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 55 of 62
Appendix A
Unregulated Contaminated Monitoring Rule (UCMR)
Contaminants Lists, PFAS Contaminants
Figure 20 - UCMR 3 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants City Council 8 – 61 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Figure 21 - UCMR 5 Contaminants List, PFAS Contaminants City Council 8 – 62 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 57 of 62
State Water Resources Control Board PFAS General
Monitoring Orders, 2020-2025
SWRCB Order
Exhibit Title
Internet URL Web Address
2020 SWRCB General Order
DW 2020-0003-DDW
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopte
d_orders/drinking_water/2020/pfas_go_2020_0003_ddw/
pfas_go_2020_0003_ddw.pdf
Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to
General Order No. DW 2020-0003-DDW
(for DDW Section 5),
https://wqts.com/wpcontent/uploads/2020/09/go_exhibit_a_section5.pdf 2021 SWRCB General Order
DW-2021-0001-DDW
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopte
d_orders/drinking_water/2021/pfas_go_2021_0001_ddw/
a5.pdf
Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to
General Order No. DW 2021-0001-DDW
(For DDW Section 5)
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_decisions/adopte
d_orders/drinking_water/2021/pfas_go_2021_0001_ddw/
a5.pdf
2022 Amended General Order DW 2022-
0001-DDW
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/dri nkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/amendedpfas-general-order-2022-final.pdf Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to
General Order No. DW 2022-0001-DDW
(Amended)
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/dri nkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/pfas_go_2022
-0001-DDW_ExhibitA.pdf
2025 SWRCB General Order
DW 2025-0002-DDW
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/dri nkingwater/pfas_ddw_general_order/docs/order-dw2025-0002-ddw-pfas-initial-monitoring.pdf Exhibit A – List of Sources Subject to
General Order DW 2025-0002-DDW
https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=https% 3A%2F%2Fwww.waterboards.ca.gov%2Fdrinking_water
%2Fcertlic%2Fdrinkingwater%2Fpfas_ddw_general_ord
er%2Fdocs%2Forder-dw-2025-0002-ddw-exhibita.xlsx&wdOrigin=BROWSELINK Figure 22 - SWRCB PFAS General Monitoring Orders Issued 2020 through 2025 City Council 8 – 63 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
State Water Resources Control Board General
Monitoring Orders PFAS Constituents Lists
Figure 23 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2020-0003-DDW, PFAS Constituents City Council 8 – 64 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 59 of 62
Figure 24 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2021-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents City Council 8 – 65 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Figure 25 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2022-0001-DDW, PFAS Constituents City Council 8 – 66 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Orange County Grand Jury 2025-2026 Page 61 of 62
Figure 26 - SWRCB General Monitoring Order 2025-0002-DDW, PFAS Constituents City Council 8 – 67 9/15/2026
PFAS and Public Awareness
Appendix B
Source: EPA
Figure 27 - EPA Eight Content Requirements of a Consumer Confidence Report City Council 8 – 68 9/15/2026
SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
[email protected]
David Penaloza
Mayor Pro Tem - Ward 6
[email protected]
Thai Viet Phan
Ward 1
[email protected]
Benjamin Vazquez
Ward 2
[email protected]
Jessie Lopez
Ward 3
[email protected]
Phil Bacerra
Ward 4
[email protected]
Johnathan Ryan Hernandez
Ward 5
[email protected]
MONTH DAY, 2026 Via E-mail and U.S. Mail
The Honorable Sheila F. Hanson
Presiding Judge of the Superior Court
700 Civic Center Drive West
Santa Ana, CA 92701
Dear Judge Hanson,
The City of Santa Ana hereby submits its response to the findings and recommendations in the 2025-2026 Orange County Grand Jury report, “PFAS and Public Awareness: A Closer Look at Orange County Drinking Water.”
The City of Santa Ana (City) thanks the Orange County Grand Jury for the time and effort invested in evaluating PFAS monitoring, regulatory requirements, treatment progress, and public communication throughout Orange County. The City appreciates the Grand Jury's recommendations and remains committed to providing reliable drinking water that meets all applicable state and federal drinking water standards. The City also proactively communicates with the public through its dedicated Water Quality webpage, annual Water Quality Reports, and project-specific community outreach.
The City is the sole water purveyor for Santa Ana residents and businesses and relies primarily on local groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin. As a member agency of the Orange County Water District (OCWD), the City works closely with OCWD, the California State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency to monitor PFAS and implement treatment in accordance with applicable drinking water requirements.
The City completed construction of its first PFAS treatment facility at Well 40 in May 2023, restoring this groundwater source to the City's water system. PFAS treatment projects for Wells 31, 38, 27, and 28 are under construction. The City and OCWD are also advancing centralized treatment at the John Garthe Reservoir for Wells 18, 24, 32, 36, and 39, and the City is planning additional treatment at the Walnut Reservoir.
In accordance with California Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05, below are the City's responses to Findings F2, F4, F6, and F8 and Recommendations R2, R4, and R5.
MAYOR
Valerie Amezcua
MAYOR PRO TEM
David Penaloza
COUNCILMEMBERS
Phil Bacerra
Johnathan Ryan Hernandez
Jessie Lopez
Thai Viet Phan
Benjamin Vazquez CITY OF SANTA ANA
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
20 Civic Center Plaza ● P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
www.santa-ana.org
CITY MANAGER
Alvaro Nuñez
CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Carvalho
CITY CLERK
Jennifer L. Hall
City Council 8 – 69 9/15/2026
MONTH DAY, 2026 Honorable Sheila F. Hanson, Presiding Judge Page 2
SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
[email protected]
David Penaloza
Mayor Pro Tem - Ward 6
[email protected]
Thai Viet Phan
Ward 1
[email protected]
Benjamin Vazquez
Ward 2
[email protected]
Jessie Lopez
Ward 3
[email protected]
Phil Bacerra
Ward 4
[email protected]
Johnathan Ryan Hernandez
Ward 5
[email protected]
FINDINGS
F2 - PFAS is widespread, and contamination has been detected in Orange County groundwater sources.
Community water systems are required to report PFAS monitoring results in their annual Consumer Confidence Reports.
RESPONSE: Agree with this Finding
PFAS has been detected in portions of the Orange County Groundwater Basin, including groundwater sources serving the City. For more than a decade, the City has proactively monitored PFAS through the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule programs, including UCMR 3 and UCMR 5, as well as multiple PFAS monitoring orders issued by the California Division of Drinking Water.
The City reports applicable PFAS monitoring results in its annual Water Quality Report, also known as the Consumer Confidence Report, in accordance with state and federal reporting requirements. The City's annual reports also provide customers with updates regarding the status and progress of its PFAS treatment projects, while the City's dedicated Water Quality webpage provides an additional source of current public information.
F4 - OCWD has taken a proactive leadership role in addressing PFAS in the Orange County Groundwater Basin, though PFAS treatment implementation varies across local cities and water districts.
RESPONSE: Agree with this Finding
OCWD has provided regional technical leadership, monitoring support, treatment planning, and financial assistance to local groundwater producers. Implementation schedules vary because each water system has different well conditions, site constraints, treatment capacities, permitting needs, and construction requirements.
Santa Ana has actively advanced a coordinated PFAS treatment program with OCWD. Well 40 is equipped with ion exchange treatment and is in service; treatment projects for Wells 31, 38, 27, and 28 are under construction; and centralized treatment at the John Garthe Reservoir and additional treatment at the Walnut Reservoir are being advanced or planned. These projects are intended to preserve the City's ability to use local groundwater supplies while maintaining compliance with applicable drinking water requirements. The City has paired these infrastructure investments with project-specific community outreach so residents are informed about the purpose, status, anticipated schedule, and community benefits of each PFAS project.
F6 - Orange County drinking water meets or exceeds state and federal standards and is safe for consumption without additional home filtration.
RESPONSE: Agree with this Finding
The City provides drinking water that meets applicable state and federal drinking water standards. Santa Ana routinely monitors its water sources and distribution system and operates its groundwater sources in accordance with California Division of Drinking Water requirements. Additional household filtration is not required for the City's drinking water to meet applicable regulatory standards. The City reinforces this message through its annual Water Quality Reports, dedicated Water Quality webpage, and community outreach regarding its PFAS treatment projects.
F8 - There are limited online PFAS education and outreach programs among Orange County water retailers.
Most retailers rely on OCWD for PFAS education and outreach. PFAS advisories were included in approximately 55% of the Orange County water retailers' annual water quality reports in 2025.
RESPONSE: Disagree Partially with this Finding
The City agrees that PFAS outreach practices vary among Orange County water retailers. However, the City disagrees with the finding to the extent it suggests that Santa Ana has limited online PFAS education or relies primarily on OCWD for PFAS education and outreach. The City maintains a dedicated Water Quality webpage (https://santa-ana.gov/water-quality/) that provides the community with information about PFAS, drinking water quality, monitoring, regulatory compliance, and the City's treatment program. The City also includes PFAS monitoring information and treatment project updates in its annual Water Quality Reports. In addition, the City City Council 8 – 70 9/15/2026
MONTH DAY, 2026 Honorable Sheila F. Hanson, Presiding Judge Page 3
SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
[email protected]
David Penaloza
Mayor Pro Tem - Ward 6
[email protected]
Thai Viet Phan
Ward 1
[email protected]
Benjamin Vazquez
Ward 2
[email protected]
Jessie Lopez
Ward 3
[email protected]
Phil Bacerra
Ward 4
[email protected]
Johnathan Ryan Hernandez
Ward 5
[email protected]
has conducted community outreach for each of its PFAS treatment projects to explain the project purpose, status, anticipated schedule, and benefits to the water system and community. Santa Ana supplements these Cityspecific communications with regional and technical information from OCWD and state and federal regulators.
Together, these efforts reflect the City's proactive, multi-channel approach to PFAS education and outreach and provide Santa Ana customers with City-specific information as treatment projects and regulatory requirements evolve.
RECOMMENDATIONS
R2 - By July 1, 2029, OCWD and its member agencies should monitor PFAS in groundwater and surface water sources and promptly implement PFAS treatment when response levels are exceeded. [F2, F4] RESPONSE: The Recommendation Has Been Implemented
The City monitors its groundwater production wells in accordance with applicable California Division of Drinking Water orders, federal Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule requirements, and the federal PFAS drinking water regulation. The City coordinates with OCWD regarding monitoring within the Orange County Groundwater Basin and Santa Ana River watershed and relies on its imported-water suppliers for monitoring imported surface water sources. When monitoring identifies a condition requiring action, the City restricts use of the affected source as appropriate and implements treatment or other corrective measures in coordination with regulators and OCWD. The City's ongoing treatment program includes the operational Well 40 facility and additional facilities in construction or planning for other City wells. Monitoring, regulatory coordination, and treatment implementation will continue through and beyond July 1, 2029.
R4 - By July 1, 2029, all Orange County water retailers should consistently include a PFAS advisory, treatment facilities status, and compliance information in consumer confidence reports and on agency websites, using clear and understandable language for the public. [F2, F8]
RESPONSE: The Recommendation Has Been Implemented
The City has implemented this recommendation through its annual Water Quality Reports and dedicated Water Quality webpage (https://santa-ana.gov/water-quality/). These resources provide customers with PFAS monitoring and compliance information, drinking water safety information, and updates regarding the status and progress of City PFAS treatment facilities. The City also provides project-specific community outreach so residents receive timely information regarding treatment projects that may affect their neighborhoods. Santa Ana will continue to review and update these materials using clear, understandable language and will coordinate with OCWD and regulatory agencies to keep public information consistent as projects and requirements evolve. The City will continue these updates beyond July 1, 2029.
R5 - By September 30, 2026, OCWD and all Orange County water retailers should enhance coordinated public education efforts to reassure their customers about drinking water safety. [F6, F8] RESPONSE: The Recommendation Has Been Implemented
The City has implemented coordinated PFAS public education through several established channels. Santa Ana maintains a dedicated Water Quality webpage, provides PFAS monitoring and treatment project updates in its annual Water Quality Reports, and conducts community outreach for each of its PFAS treatment projects. These efforts provide customers with Santa Ana-specific information regarding drinking water safety, regulatory compliance, treatment facility status, project schedules, and anticipated community benefits. The City also coordinates with OCWD to align regional safety and technical messages and directs the public to authoritative state and federal resources when additional information is needed. The City will continue enhancing these coordinated efforts through and beyond September 30, 2026, as PFAS projects advance and regulatory requirements evolve.
City Council 8 – 71 9/15/2026
MONTH DAY, 2026 Honorable Sheila F. Hanson, Presiding Judge Page 4
SANTA ANA CITY COUNCIL
Valerie Amezcua
Mayor
[email protected]
David Penaloza
Mayor Pro Tem - Ward 6
[email protected]
Thai Viet Phan
Ward 1
[email protected]
Benjamin Vazquez
Ward 2
[email protected]
Jessie Lopez
Ward 3
[email protected]
Phil Bacerra
Ward 4
[email protected]
Johnathan Ryan Hernandez
Ward 5
[email protected]
The City appreciates the opportunity to respond to the Grand Jury's findings and recommendations and looks forward to continued collaboration with OCWD, state and federal regulators, and other Orange County water agencies to protect public health, maintain regulatory compliance, and provide clear information to the public.
Sincerely,
Alvaro Nuñez
City Manager
Attachments: City Council staff report dated MONTH DAY, 2026 and related exhibits City Council 8 – 72 9/15/2026
Library
www.santa-ana.gov/library
Item # 9
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: California State Library Building Forward Grant Interest Revenues
AGENDA TITLE
Appropriation Adjustment for Spendable Fund Balance from California State Library Building Forward Grant Interest Revenues for Main Library and Newhope Library Projects (Project Nos. 22-1380 and 22-1802) (Non-General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $297,104 in spendable fund balance from California State Library Building Forward Grant Interest for Main Library and Newhope Library Projects in the Public Library Grant, Prior Year Carryforward revenue account and appropriate the funds into the Building Forward Library Grant, Buildings & Building Improvements expenditure account to fund construction expenses. (Requires five affirmative votes)
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
On March 15, 2022, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2022-020, authorizing the submission of a California State Library Building Forward Library Facilities Improvement Program Grant application for the Main Library Transformation Project and subsequent acceptance of grant funds. The Library was awarded $9,329,973 in grant funds for critical maintenance needs and public safety and accessibility improvements such as Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) upgrades, new accessible elevator, marble improvements, Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) replacement, and electrical, mechanical, and plumbing system upgrades.
Similarly, on November 7, 2023, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2023-074, authorizing the submission of a California State Library Building Forward Grant application for the Newhope Library Renovation Project and subsequent acceptance of grant funds. The Library was awarded $1,086,754 in grant funds for critical infrastructure improvements including HVAC replacement, electrical upgrades, plumbing updates, fire protection system improvements, and new storefronts.
City Council 9 – 1 9/15/2026
California State Library Building Forward Grant Interest Revenues September 15, 2026
Both grant agreements require that any interest earned on the grant funds held by the grantee be contributed to the projects. As of July 31, 2026, the Main Library grant earned $245,470 in interest, while the Newhope Library grant earned $18,634.
Additionally, the estimated earned interest on the grant funds from August 2026 through grant closeout in October 2026 is $33,000, bringing the total interest earned to $297,104.
Grant funds for the Main Library (received February 2023) and Newhope Library (received February 2024) were deposited during early design phases and well ahead of construction commencement in August 2024 and July 2025, which respectively allowed interest to accumulate on the allocations. Additionally, the Library prioritized spending American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding for both projects before spending grant funds, which further contributed to the available interest balances.
The Library intends to use the interest revenue to offset construction costs for both projects. Utilizing the interest funds will result in cost savings and preservation of local General Fund and Cannabis funds for other Library needs.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
With approval of the recommended appropriation adjustment in the amount of $297,104, the current available spendable fund balance of $264,104 as of July 31, 2026 as well as the estimated earned interest of $33,000 from August 2026-October 2026 will be appropriated for spending in the Building Forward Library Grant, Buildings & Building Improvements expenditure account (15211154-66200). However, total expenditures will not exceed the actual interest earned through grant closeout. Any remaining balances not expended by the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for approval of carryovers to Fiscal Year 2027-28.
Fiscal
Year
Accounting UnitAccount #Fund
Description
AU,
Account Description Amount
FY 26-27 15211154-66200
(Proj #22-1380)
Public
Library
Grant Fund
Building Forward
Library Grant –
Buildings & Building
Improvements
$276,142
FY 26-27 15211154-66200
(Proj #22-1802)
Public
Library
Grant Fund
Building Forward
Library Grant –
Buildings & Building
Improvements
$20,962
TOTAL $297,104
City Council 9 – 2 9/15/2026
California State Library Building Forward Grant Interest Revenues September 15, 2026
Submitted By: Brian Sternberg, Executive Director of Library Services Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 9 – 3 9/15/2026
Parks, Recreation & Community Services Agency
www.santa-ana.gov/parks-recreation
Item # 10
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Agreement for Thornton Park Host
AGENDA TITLE
Approve the Park Host Agreement, Volunteer Acknowledgement, Indemnity Agreement, and Release of Liability for Thornton Park Host
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Approve the Park Host Agreement and related agreements with Katie Rivero for the Park Host Program (Agreement No. 2026-XXX).
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
On May 16, 2022, the City of Santa Ana established the Thornton Park Host Volunteer Pilot Program through an agreement with Katie Rivero. The program was designed to provide a consistent on-site presence at Carl Thornton Park to support park operations, promote compliance with park rules and regulations, facilitate communication with City staff, and serve as an additional resource for park users.
Under the agreement, the Park Host was authorized to reside at Carl Thornton Park in a recreational vehicle and serve in a volunteer capacity. Responsibilities included submitting daily activity reports to City staff, reporting maintenance concerns through the MySantaAna application, identifying and reporting unusual activity, conducting routine park rounds, and providing information and assistance to park users.
The pilot program was originally scheduled to conclude on May 16, 2024, unless terminated earlier by the City. The City subsequently extended the agreement through December 31, 2025, to continue the Park Host Program and maintain an on-site presence at Carl Thornton Park.
The agreement was subsequently extended through December 31, 2026, and is scheduled to expire at the end of the year. To continue the Park Host Program beyond the current term, City Council approval of a new Park Host Agreement and related documents is required.
City Council 10 – 1 9/15/2026
Agreement for Thornton Park Host
September 15, 2026
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
The recommended action is exempt from further environmental analysis pursuant to Section 15301 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Class 1 exemption – Existing Facilities). Class 1 exemptions consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The types of “existing facilities” itemized in the CEQA Guidelines (page 307) are not intended to be all-inclusive of the types of projects which might fall within Class 1. The key consideration is whether the project involves negligible or no expansion of use.
The recommended action is to approve a Park Host agreement to occupy an existing structure, served by existing utilities in an urbanized area, which does not result in any new direct, indirect, or foreseeable physical impacts to the environment. The structure meets the qualifications of an “existing facility,” and the recommended action is therefore exempt pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines. A notice of exemption will be filed for the Project.
FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated annual cost to the City for operation of the Park Host Program is $12,524, including approximately $6,000 for utilities (electricity, propane, and water), $3,500 for ongoing maintenance, and $3,024 for golf cart maintenance. Utility and ongoing maintenance costs will be absorbed within the Public Works Agency’s Park Maintenance Utilities budget (AU 01117651-62000) and Maintenance & Repair, Buildings & Ground budget (AU 01117651-62320), while golf cart maintenance costs will be absorbed within the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Agency Rental City Equipment budget (AU 01113230-65010).
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Park Host Volunteer Acknowledgement, Indemnity Agreement and Release of Liability
Submitted By: Kathryn Downs, Assistant City Manager
Timothy J. Pagano, Deputy Director of PRCSA
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 10 – 2 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 3 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 4 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 5 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 6 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 7 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 8 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 9 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 10 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 11 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 12 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 13 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 14 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 15 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 16 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 17 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 18 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 19 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 20 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 21 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 22 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 23 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 24 9/15/2026
City Council 10 – 25 9/15/2026
Police Department
www.santa-ana.gov/pd
Item # 11
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Inmate Health Care Services
AGENDA TITLE
Second Amendment to Agreement with California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. and Wellpath (General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Authorize the City Manager to execute the second amendment to the agreement with California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. and Wellpath to continue providing health care services to inmates and arrestees housed at the Santa Ana Jail and exercise the second one-year renewal option to extend the term through September 30, 2027 in an annual amount of $3,664,243, for a total aggregate amount not to exceed $17,507,799 (Agreement No. A-2026-XXX).
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes
DISCUSSION
California's Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) requires agencies to provide basic and emergency health care services for all incarcerated individuals held within their custody. Current City initiatives addressing quality of life and public nuisances have necessitated an elevated level of care for short-term arrestees.
On September 20, 2022, the City Council approved a three-year agreement with two additional one-year extension options with California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. and Wellpath (CFMG) to provide these services at the Santa Ana Jail after a competitive request for proposals process in a total amount not to exceed $10,070,246. CFMG's services include direct patient care, a sick call program, health assessments, administration of medications, on-site dental services, and mental health care.
On September 16, 2025, the City Council approved the first amendment to the agreement to exercise the first one-year renewal option and increase compensation by an additional $3,773,310. Medical staffing levels were also adjusted to address the increased workload and associated medical concerns while ensuring an appropriate standard of initial care, City Council 11 – 1 9/15/2026
Inmate Health Care Services
September 15, 2026
as the City's enforcement activity in the areas of frontline policing and public nuisances increased. CFMG has proven reliable and flexible through this patient profile evolution.
Throughout the term of this agreement, CFMG has provided exceptional service to the City. Therefore, the department recommends exercising the second and final one-year extension option to renew this agreement from October 1, 2026 through September 30, 2027 in an annual amount of $3,664,243. The total not-to-exceed amount for this agreement will increase to $17,507,799 inclusive of amounts for services as necessary at the City's sole discretion.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
Funding is available in the current FY 26-27 budget and funding for the subsequent fiscal year will be included in the proposed budget for City Council consideration.
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Second Amendment to Agreement with California Forensic Medical Group, Inc. and Wellpath
Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Police Chief
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
Fiscal
Year
Accounting Unit -
Account No.
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account No.
Description
Amount
FY 26-27 01114475-62300 General Fund
Jail Operations,
Contract ServicesProfessional$2,748,182
FY 27-28 01114475-62300 General Fund
Jail Operations,
Contract ServicesProfessional$ 916,061
Total $3,664,243
City Council 11 – 2 9/15/2026
Docusign Envelope ID: 73551CA2-8471-8289-82C6-6DB7741BA72D
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC. AND WELLPATH
FOR INMATE HEALTH CARE SERVICES
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to the above-referenced agreement is entered into on September 15, 2026, by and between California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., and Wellpath (hereinafter referred to as, "Contractor" or "CFMG"), a California Professional Medical Corporation and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City'5).
WHEREAS, the parties entered into Agreement No. A-2022-187 on September 20, 2022, by which CFMG agreed to provide quality health care to Inmates and Detainees ("City Inmates/Detainees") housed at the Santa Ana Detention Facility ("Agreement'5); and WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement commenced on October 1, 2022 and continued for an initial three-year period until September 30, 2025 with the option to renew the term of the Agreement for up to two (2) additional one-year periods; and WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a First Amendment to the Agreement (A-2022-187- 01) to: 1) exercise the first option to extend the term of the Agreement through September 30, 2026; 2) amend the compensation and adjustments consistent with CPI Increases; and 3) amend staffing hours; and
WHEREAS, the Agreement is current and in-effect; and
WHEREAS, the Parties agree to exercise the second and final one-year extension of the Agreement, and to amend the compensation and adjustments consistent with CPI Increases; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 11.17, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement to memorialize such changes.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the City and Contractor agree as follows:
1. AMEND SECTION g.o, TERM. The parties agree to exercise the second and final extension to the term of the Agreement through September 30, 2027.
2. AMEND ARTICLE VIII - COMPENSATION AND ADJUSTMENTS. Pursuant to Section 9.0.1. upon the extension of the Agreement on October 1, 2026, the parties agree to amend Article VIII - Compensation and Adjustments. In accordance with the provisions of Section 9.0.1.1- CPI INCREASES, the annual compensation amount is increased by 4%, resulting in an annual amount of $3,664,242.36, payable in 12 monthly installments of $305,353.53. ThetotalamounttobeexpendedduringthetermofthisAgreementisamended to $17,507,798.28 inclusive of amounts for services as necessary at the City's sole discretion.
City Council 11 – 3 9/15/2026
Docusign Envelope ID: 73551CA2-8471-8289-82C6-6DB7741BA72D
3. Except as modified by this Second Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Second Amendment to be executed in their names or their official acts by their respective representatives, each of whom is duly puthorized to execute the same.
ATTEST CITY OF SANTA ANA
JENNIFER L. HALL
City Clerk
ALVARO NUNEZ
City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
Assistant City Attorney
By: Judd Bazzel
Title:
President
RECOMMENDED FOR
APPROV AL:
ROBERT RODRIGUEZ
Chief of Police
City Council 11 – 4 9/15/2026
Police Department
www.santa-ana.gov/pd
Item # 12
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program
AGENDA TITLE
Agreement and Appropriation Adjustment Accepting $768,000 from the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol, Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (Non-General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with the State of California, Department of California Highway Patrol for the Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program for education, prevention, and enforcement of laws related to driving under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, including cannabis and cannabis products, for a one-year period beginning July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027 in an amount not to exceed $768,000 (Agreement No. 2026-XXX).
2. Approve an appropriation adjustment accepting $768,000 in the California Highway Patrol, State Grant-Indirect revenue account (no. 12814002-52025) and appropriate same to the Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program, Salaries Overtime expenditure account (no. 12814418-61040). (Requires five affirmative votes) GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
DISCUSSION
The Santa Ana Police Department has been awarded $768,000 in grant funding from the State of California, California Highway Patrol (CHP) under the Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program (CTFGP). This one-year agreement covers the program period from July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027. The goal of CHP CTFGP is for the education, prevention, and enforcement of laws related to driving under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, including cannabis and cannabis products. The intent of the program is to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve our effectiveness through training and development of new strategies.
City Council 12 – 1 9/15/2026
Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program
September 15, 2026
The enforcement activities will follow proven “best practice” strategies and will be conducted on an overtime basis. The funded strategies will primarily focus on Driving under the Influence (DUI) saturation patrols throughout the City of Santa Ana.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the appropriation adjustment will recognize $768,000 in the Department of California Highway Patrol- State Grant-Indirect revenue account (no. 12814002-52025) and appropriate same in the Cannabis Tax Fund Program expenditure account below:
Fiscal Year Accounting Unit -
Account No. Fund Description Accounting Unit, Account Description Amount FY 26-27 12814418-61040 Law Enforcement
Grants
Cannabis Tax Fund
Grant Program,
Salaries Overtime
$768,000
Total $768,000
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Grant Agreement with Department of California Highway Patrol Submitted By: Robert Rodriguez, Police Chief
Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 12 – 2 9/15/2026
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
GRANT AGREEMENT - Page 1
Award Number
30879
1. GRANT TITLE
FY26/27 CTFGP Law Enforcement - Santa Ana Police Department
2. NAME OF ORGANIZATION/AGENCY
Santa Ana Police Department
3. ORGANIZATION/AGENCY SECTION TO ADMINISTER GRANT
Santa Ana Police Department/Traffic
4. PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD
From: 07/01/2026 To: 06/30/2027
5. PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER
6. GRANT OPPORTUNITY INFORMATION DESCRIPTION
Law Enforcement grants provide financial assistance to allied agencies for the education, prevention, and the enforcement of laws related to driving under the influence of alcohol and other drugs, including cannabis and cannabis products.
The intent of the program is to educate the public regarding the dangers of impaired driving, enforce impaired driving laws on the roadway, and improve the Organization/Agency’s effectiveness through training and development of new strategies.
7. FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS GRANT AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED $768,000.00
8. TERMS AND CONDITIONS
The Grantee agrees to complete the Project, as described in the Project Description. The Grantee’s Grant Application, and the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 2, Chapter 13, Sections 1890.00-1890.27, are hereby incorporated into this Grant Agreement by reference.
The parties hereto agree to comply with the Terms and Conditions of the following attachments:
• Schedule A – Project Description, Problem Statement, Goals and Objectives, and Method of Procedure • Schedule B – Detailed Budget Estimate
• Schedule B-1 – Budget Narrative
We, the officials named below, hereby swear, under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California, that we are duly authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above-described Grant Terms and Conditions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Grant Agreement is executed by the parties hereto.
9. APPROVAL SIGNATURES
A. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF ORGANIZATION/AGENCY
Name: Alvaro Nunez
Title: City Manager
Phone: (714) 647-5200
Address: 60 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
E-Mail: [email protected]
(Signature) (Date)
B. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL OF CHP
Name: Elliotte Johnson Phone: (916) 843-4360
Title: Captain Fax: (916) 322-3169
Address: 601 North 7th Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
E-Mail: [email protected]
(Signature) (Date)
C. ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF CHP
Name: M. V. Fojas Phone: (916) 843-3531
Title: Commander Fax: (916) 322-3159
Address: 601 North 7th Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
E-Mail: [email protected]
(Signature) (Date)
10. AUTHORIZED FINANCIAL CONTACT TO RECEIVE
REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENTS
Name: Alexander Trinidad
Title: Director of Finance and Management Svcs
Phone: (714) 647-5200
Address: 20 Civic Center Plaza
Santa Ana, CA 92701
EXHIBIT 1
City Council 12 – 3 9/15/2026
ATTEST:
Jennifer L. Hall
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARV ALHO
City Attorney
BY:
n Salvatierra
Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APP OV AL:
Robert Rodriguez
Chief of Police
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROV AL:
Alexander Trinidad
Executive Director,
Finance and Management Services
Alexander Trinidad (Sep 2, 2026 17:37:03 PDT)
City Council 12 – 4 9/15/2026
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Grantee shall comply with the California Code of Regulations, Title 13, Division 2, Chapter 13 Section 1890, et seq. and all other Terms and Conditions noted in this Grant Agreement. Failure by the Grantee to comply may result in the termination of this Grant Agreement by the California Highway Patrol (hereafter referred to as State). The State will have no obligation to reimburse the Grantee for any additional costs once the Grant Agreement has been terminated.
A. EXECUTION
1. The State (the California Highway Patrol) hereby awards, to the Grantee, the sum of money stated on page one of this Grant Agreement. This funding is awarded to the Grantee to carry out the Project set forth in the Project Description and the terms and conditions set forth in this Grant Agreement.
2. The funding for this Grant Agreement is allocated pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 34019(f)(3)(B). The Grantee agrees that the State’s obligation to pay any sum under this Grant Agreement is contingent upon availability of funds disbursed from the California Cannabis Tax Fund to the State. If there is insufficient funding, the State shall have the option to either: 1) terminate this Grant Agreement; whereby, no party shall have any further obligations or liabilities under this Grant Agreement, or 2) negotiate a Grant Agreement Amendment to reduce the grant award and scope of work to be provided under this Grant Agreement.
3. The Grantee is not to commence or proceed with any work in advance of receiving notice that the Grant Agreement is approved. Any work performed by the Grantee in advance of the date of approval by the State shall be deemed volunteer work and will not be reimbursed by the State.
4. The Grantee agrees to provide any additional funding, beyond what the State has agreed to provide, pursuant to this Grant Agreement, and necessary to complete or carry out the Project, as described in this Grant Agreement. Any modification or alteration of this Grant Agreement, as set forth in the Grant Application submitted by the Grantee and on file with the State, must be submitted in writing thirty (30) calendar days in advance to the State for approval.
5. The Grantee agrees to complete the Project within the timeframe indicated in the Project Performance Period, which is on page one of this Grant Agreement.
B. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
1. The Grantee shall submit all reimbursements, progress, performance, and/or other required reports concerning the status of work performed in furtherance of this Grant Agreement on a quarterly basis, or as requested by the State.
2. The Grantee shall provide the State with a final report showing all Project expenditures, which includes all State and any other Project funding expended, within sixty (60) calendar days after completion of this Grant Agreement.
3. The Grantee shall ensure all equipment which is purchased, maintained, operated, and/or developed is available for inspection by the State.
4. Equipment purchased through this Grant Agreement shall be used for the education, prevention, and enforcement of impaired driving laws, unless the Grantee is funding a portion of the purchased price not dedicated to impaired driving and that portion is not part of the Project costs.
Equipment purchased under this Grant Agreement must only be used for approved Projectrelated purposes, unless otherwise approved by the State in writing.
5. Prior to disposition of equipment acquired under this Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall notify the State via e-mail, and by telephone, by calling the California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit at (916) 843-4360.
City Council 12 – 5 9/15/2026
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
C. PROJECT TERMINATION
1. Grantee or the State may terminate this Grant Agreement at any time prior to the commencement of the Project. Once the Project has commenced, this Grant Agreement may only be terminated if the party withdrawing provides thirty (30) calendar days written notice of their intent to withdraw.
a. If by reason of force majeure the performance hereunder is delayed or prevented, then the term end date may be extended by mutual consent for the same amount of time of such delay or prevention. The term “force majeure” shall mean any fire, flood, earthquake, or public disaster, strike, labor dispute or unrest, embargo, riot, war, insurrection or civil unrest, any act of God, any act of legally constituted authority, or any other cause beyond the Grantee’s control which would excuse the Grantee’s performance as a matter of law. b. Grantee agrees to provide written notice of an event of force majeure under this Grant Agreement within ten (10) calendar days of the commencement of such event, and within ten (10) calendar days after the termination of such event, unless the force majeure prohibits Grantee from reasonably giving notice within this period. Grantee will give such notice at the earliest possible time following the event of force majeure.
2. Any violations of law committed by the Grantee, misrepresentations of Project information by the Grantee to the State, submission of falsified documents by the Grantee to the State, or failure to provide records by the Grantee to the State when requested for audit or site visit purposes may be cause for termination. If the Project is terminated for the reasons described in this paragraph, the State will have no obligation to reimburse the Grantee for any additional costs once the Grant Agreement has been terminated.
3. The State may terminate this Grant Agreement and be relieved of any payments should the Grantee fail to perform the requirements of this Grant Agreement at the time and in the manner herein provided. Furthermore, the Grantee, upon termination, shall return grant funds not expended by the Grantee as of the date of termination.
4. If this Grant Agreement is terminated, the State may choose to exclude the Grantee from future Grant Opportunities.
D. FINANCIAL RECORDS
1. The Grantee agrees the State, or their designated representative, shall have the right to review and to copy all records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Grant Agreement. Grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of five (5) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated or required by law. Grantee agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Furthermore, the Grantee agrees to include a similar right for the State to audit all records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Grant Agreement.
E. HOLD HARMLESS
1. The Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend, and save harmless the State, its officials, agents and employees from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all Grantee’s staff, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Grant Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, agency, firm, corporation who may be injured or damaged by the Grantee in performance of this Grant Agreement.
City Council 12 – 6 9/15/2026
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
F. NONDISCRIMINATION
1. The Grantee agrees to comply with State and federal laws outlawing discrimination, including, but not limited to, those prohibiting discrimination because of sex, race, color, ancestry, religion, creed, national origin, physical disability (including HIV and AIDS), mental disability, medical condition (including cancer or genetic characteristics), sexual orientation, political affiliation, position in a labor dispute, age, marital status, and denial of statutorily-required employmentrelated leave. (GC 12990 [a-f] and CCR, Title 2, Section 8103.) G. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
1. The Grantee assures the State it complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) H. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
1. The Grantee shall comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations.
b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace.
ii. The person's or Organization/Agency's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace. iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs. iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. c. Every employee who works on the Project will:
i. Receive a copy of the company's drug-free workplace policy statement. ii. Agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the Grant Agreement.
2. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Grant Agreement, or termination of this Grant Agreement, or both, and Grantee may be ineligible for award of any future Grant Agreements if the department determines that any of the following has occurred:
a. The Grantee has made false certification or violated the certification by failing to carry out the requirements, as noted above. (GC 8350 et seq.)
I. LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
1. All law enforcement Organization/Agency Grantees shall comply with California law regarding racial profiling. Specifically, law enforcement Organization/Agency Grantees shall not engage in the act of racial profiling, as defined in California Penal Code Section 13519.4.
City Council 12 – 7 9/15/2026
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
J. LABOR CODE/WORKERS' COMPENSATION
1. The Grantee is advised and made aware of the provisions which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions, and Grantee affirms to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Grant Agreement, (refer to Labor Code Section 3700).
K. GRANT APPLICATION INCORPORATION
1. The Grantee agrees the Grant Application and any subsequent changes or additions approved or required by the State is hereby incorporated into this Grant Agreement.
L. STATE LOBBYING
1. The Grantee is advised that none of the funds provided under this Grant Agreement may be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a state or local legislator to favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any state or local legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., “grassroots”) lobbying activities, with one exception. This does not preclude a state official, whose salary is supported by this Grant Agreement, from engaging in direct communications with the state or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary state and/or local practice.
M. REPRESENTATION AND WARRANTIES
1. The Grantee represents and warrants that:
a. It is validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of California, has, or will have the requisite power, authority, licenses, permits, and the like necessary to carry on its business as it is now being conducted and as contemplated in this Grant Agreement, and will, at all times, lawfully conduct its business in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and rules.
b. It is not a party to any Grant Agreement, written or oral, creating obligations that would prevent it from entering into this Grant Agreement or satisfying the terms herein. c. If the Grantee is a Nonprofit Organization/Agency, it will maintain its “Active” status with the California Secretary of State, maintain its “Current” status with the California Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts, and maintain its federal and State of California taxexempt status. If the Grantee subcontracts with a Nonprofit as part of this Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall ensure the Nonprofit will maintain its “Active” status with the California Secretary of State, maintain its “Current” status with the California Attorney General’s Registry of Charitable Trusts, and maintain its federal and State of California tax-exempt status.
d. All of the information in its Grant Application and all materials submitted are true and accurate.
N. AIR OR WATER POLLUTION VIOLATION
1. Under the state laws, the Grantee shall not be: (1) in violation of any order or resolution not subject to review promulgated by the State Air Resources Board or an air pollution control district; (2) subject to cease and desist order not subject to review issued pursuant to Section 13301 of the Water Code for violation of waste discharge requirements or discharge prohibitions; or (3) finally determined to be in violation of provisions of federal law relating to air or water pollution.
City Council 12 – 8 9/15/2026
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
O. GRANTEE NAME CHANGE
1. Grantee agrees to immediately inform the State, in writing, of any changes to the name of the person within the Organization/Agency with delegated signing authority.
2. An Amendment is required to change the Grantee's name, as listed on this Grant Agreement. Upon receipt of legal documentation of the name change, the State will process the Amendment. Payment of invoices presented with a new name cannot be paid prior to approval of said Amendment.
P. RESOLUTION
1. A county, city, district, or other local public body shall provide the State with a copy of a resolution, order, motion, or ordinance of the local governing body, which by law, has authority to enter into a Grant Agreement, authorizing execution of the Grant Agreement.
Q. PAYEE DATA RECORD FORM STD. 204
1. This form shall be completed by all non-governmental Grantees.
R. FINANCIAL INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT AGENCY TAXPAYER ID FORM
1. This form shall be completed by all Grantees.
S. CONFLICT OF INTEREST
1. This section serves to make the Grantee aware of specific provisions related to current or former state employees. If Grantee has any questions regarding the status of any person rendering services or involved with the Grant Agreement, the Grantee shall contact the State (California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit) immediately for clarification.
2. Current State Employees:
a. No officer or employee shall engage in any employment, activity, or enterprise, from which the officer or employee receives compensation or has a financial interest, and which is sponsored or funded by any state agency, unless the employment, activity, or enterprise is required, as a condition of regular state employment.
b. No officer or employee shall contract on their own behalf, as an independent Grantee, with any state agency to provide goods or services.
3. Former State Employees:
a. For the two-year period from the date they left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract in which they engaged in any of the negotiations, transactions, planning, arrangements, or any part of the decision-making process relevant to this Grant Agreement while employed in any capacity by any state agency. b. For the 12-month period from the date they left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract with any state agency if they were employed by that state agency in a policy-making position in the same general subject area as the proposed Grant Agreement within the 12-month period prior to their leaving state service.
4. The authorized representative of the Grantee Organization/Agency, named within this Grant Agreement, warrants their Organization/Agency and its employees have no personal or financial interest and no present or past employment or activity, which would be incompatible with City Council 12 – 9 9/15/2026
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
participating in any activity related to this Grant Agreement. For the duration of this Grant Agreement, the Organization/Agency and its employees will not accept any gift, benefit, gratuity or consideration, or begin a personal or financial interest in a party who is associated with this Grant Agreement.
5. The Grantee Organization/Agency and its employees shall not disclose any financial, statistical, personal, technical, media-related, and/or other information or data derived from this Grant Agreement, made available for use by the State, for the purposes of providing services to the State, in conjunction with this Grant Agreement, except as otherwise required by law or explicitly permitted by the State in writing. The Grantee shall immediately advise the State of any person(s) who has access to confidential Project information and intends to disclose that information in violation of this Grant Agreement.
6. The Grantee will not enter into any Grant Agreement or discussions with third parties concerning materials described in paragraph five (5) prior to receiving written confirmation from the State that such third party has a Grant Agreement with the State, similar in nature to this one.
7. The Grantee warrants that only those employees who are authorized and required to use the materials described in paragraph 5 will have access to them.
8. If the Grantee violates any provisions in the above paragraphs, such action by the Grantee shall render this Grant Agreement void.
T. EQUIPMENT-USE TERMS
1. The Grantee agrees any equipment purchased under this Grant Agreement shall be used for impaired driving efforts.
2. Law Enforcement Projects:
a. Oral Fluid Drug Screening Devices and Cannabis/Marijuana Breath Testing Equipment - The Grantee agrees to ensure all personnel using road-side drug testing equipment, including oral fluid drug testing devices and/or cannabis/marijuana breath testing devices, purchased with grant funds from this Grant Agreement, are trained to recognize alcohol and drug impairment.
At a minimum, personnel using these devices should receive Standardized Field Sobriety Testing training. These personnel are also encouraged to attend Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement and Drug Recognition Evaluator training. Prior to using these devices, the Grantee agrees to obtain permission from their local prosecutor’s office, establish a policy ensuring appropriate use, and require the staff using these devices to receive appropriate training, which may include training from the manufacturer. This will help ensure the equipment is used appropriately. The Grantee shall advise the State (California Highway Patrol, Impaired Driving Section, Cannabis Grants Unit) of any legal challenges or other items of significance that may affect the use or legal acceptance of these devices.
Additionally, the State may request additional information about the performance of these devices, including information about their use, accuracy, and feedback from personnel using the devices.
b. Law Enforcement Vehicles – The Grantee agrees any law enforcement vehicles purchased with Grant funds, from this Grant Agreement, will be primarily used for the enforcement of driving under the influence laws and/or providing public education, related to the dangers of driving under the influence. Additionally, any vehicle purchased using funds from this Grant Agreement shall comply with all California Vehicle Code and California Code of Regulation requirements. The State may require the Grantee to mark these vehicles with a decal and/or emblem, indicating the vehicle is used for driving under the influence enforcement.
City Council 12 – 10 9/15/2026
Schedule A
Santa Ana Police Department
The Grantor determined awards and adjustments based on the Project’s merit, operational scale, compliance with the Request for Application (RFA), and program regulations. Certain activities or budget items proposed in Schedule A may have been deemed ineligible for funding. The final, binding list of authorized activities and expenses is set forth in Schedule B - Detailed Budget Estimate.
Project Description
The Santa Ana Police Department does not provide in-house training at this time for DUI related investigations. As part of the field training program, Officers are exposed to DUI related investigations, and they are assigned to a Traffic Unit FTO for two weeks where they focus on DUI investigations.
There is a dire need for more SFST and DRE instructors to assist with training the sworn personnel of the department in the important subject of DUI and DUID investigations. Additional funding to send Officers to these training courses would improve our ability to conduct enforcement.
Traffic Unit, along with our Community Outreach Team, have had educational booths educating citizens on the dangers of driving while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of both. Community engagement and education will play a critical role in addressing traffic safety concerns. SAPD will have the opportunity to work closely with neighborhood groups, schools, businesses, and local organizations to understand the specific needs of different communities and to develop culturally relevant public education opportunities.
In terms of enforcement efforts, the ultimate goal of the Santa Ana Police Department would be to increase the total number of DUI saturation operations conducted per year. The department is provided with funding to conduct DUI saturation patrol from the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Step grant. While this additional funding has helped the department combat impaired driving, additional allocated funding in this category would help combat the growing issue and trend of impaired driving arrests, ultimately reducing serious fatal traffic collisions.
Problem Statement
The City of Santa Ana, located at the center of Orange County, California, is the seat of the county with a rich history and diverse cultural heritage. The city has a strong economy and attracts tourism from all around to its downtown, concert halls, and other attractions. As of 2024, Santa Ana has a population of approximately 316,184 within 27.52 square miles. The city is home to many ethnic backgrounds including a large Hispanic/Latino population, as well as a significant Vietnamese population. Each day it is estimated the population grows to well over 500,000 people including tourists, employees, and others who travel into the city on a daily basis. Santa Ana is the 3rd most populated city in Orange County, 14th in California, and 65th most populated city in the United States. Santa Ana has a population density of approximately 11,500 to 12,500 people per square mile with a growth rate of approximately 1.6%. It is the 16th most densely populated city in the United States, beating out cities such as Los Angeles, Seattle, and Minneapolis.
With approximately 350 sworn Officers in the city, including Detectives, special details, and command staff, there is approximately 903 residents per Officer within the 27 square miles. However, there are only 10 Motor Officers assigned to conduct routine traffic enforcement across the city on a daily basis. This equates to one Motor Officer per every 31,618 residents and does not include the visitors, patrons, and working force within the city.
The city of Santa Ana faces many transportation safety challenges. Many residents within the city ride bicycles to and from work, as well as scooters, skateboards, and a large number walk on foot. Traffic crashes are routinely one of the most common calls for service responded to by Officers within the city. Many of these traffic crashes involve drivers who are unlicensed and/or under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both. These crashes often result in injuries and even death. Although the city traffic engineering department has made efforts to quell the number of traffic crashes in the city, the large number of impaired drivers circumvent these safety changes and can cause crashes.
In the City of Santa Ana, there were 135 fatal traffic crashes from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2025. Of those fatal crashes, 40 involved alcohol impaired drivers, 43 involved drug impaired drivers, and 3 involved drivers impaired by a combination of both. Drug and/or alcohol impaired drivers were involved in 644 injury involved traffic crashes in those 5 years. The negative effects of impaired driving has struck our community on City Council several occasions and continues to do so. 12 – 11 9/15/2026 Schedule A
A notable example occurred in July of 2020 when the life of an OC Register editor was taken by a drunk driver who was involved in a street race. The driver was found to have a prior DUI conviction and was driving despite suspensions on his license. The driver of the vehicle was convicted in 2022 of felony DUI, DUI with a prior, and murder. The Orange County community mourned the passing of the OC Register editor, and this tragedy is brought up in community meetings regularly. Recently, in April of 2024, a man was driving with his girlfriend at a high rate of speed when he lost control and crashed into a palm tree, killing his girlfriend in the front passenger seat. He was found to be under the influence of drugs and alcohol. In December of 2025, he was convicted for felony DUI, DUI with a prior, and murder. Both families involved in these tragedies have been affected forever as a result of impaired driving.
The Santa Ana Police Department is committed to using all available resources to combat the issue. The City of Santa Ana has made it very clear there is zero tolerance for impaired driving. In 2025, Santa Ana recorded XX fatalities and 2140 injuries resulting from traffic crashes. Of particular concern is the safety of vulnerable road users, as 14 pedestrians were killed with 166 injured and 3 bicyclists were killed with 205 injures. We also saw a rise in motorcyclist injuries with 60 and 2 killed. These numbers do not include the countless crashes that went unreported.
In the last five years, over 2500 arrests and several thousand citizen contacts related to DUI investigations have been made. Unfortunately, a lack of confidence and/or training has led to some DUI drivers being released from crash scenes or traffic stops. The Santa Ana Police Department is committed to providing training to all sworn staff in order to equip them with the knowledge and skillset to recognize, investigate, and ultimately arrest impaired drivers in the city. Currently, there are only 3 SFST instructors and 0 DRE instructors in the Santa Ana Police Department. With the culture of DUI enforcement being changed, ideally these numbers will rise, as well as the number of SFST, ARIDE, and DRE trained Officers.
Through the opportunities to our department through the OTS STEP grant, we are able to continue our efforts toward eliminating impaired driving within our city. Using strategic and selective enforcement, we are able to combat the dangers of impaired driving within the city. The Santa Ana Police Department conducts monthly DUI checkpoints through the OTS STEP grant, and we use the opportunity to educate the community of the risks, as well as the costs, of impaired driving. After 2025, the Santa Ana Police Department traffic unit saw 5 motor officers received the MADD award, as well as 2 officers in patrol. Although the OTS STEP grant has provided us with great opportunities to combat impaired driving, with the assistance of the CHP CTFGP, the Santa Ana Police Department can provide more enforcement and education to continue the fight against impaired driving.
Studies show the issue of impaired driving continues to rise. According to the 2018 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUJ) in 2018, 12.6 million motorists drove under the influence of illicit drugs. After alcohol, Marijuana is the drug most found to be located within the blood of drivers involved in traffic crashes.
THC (Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol) can be detected in body fluids for several days, even weeks after usage and is often combined with alcohol. Santa Ana is home to over 30 retail cannabis locations including the one of the largest in the United States. Santa Ana is considered a major hub for the industry in Orange County, as well as all of Southern California. The presence of cannabis in the city is large and the use is overwhelming.
Unfortunately, these businesses bring in revenue and dangerous driving conditions.
The vehicle crash risk associated with Marijuana in combination with alcohol, cocaine, or benzodiazepines appears to be greater than that for each drug by itself. According to the Governors Highway Safety Association, 43.6% of fatally injured drivers in 2016 tested positive for drugs and over half of those drivers tested positive for two or more drugs. Based on data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in 2016, among drivers tested in fatal crashes, 44% had used a legal or illicit drug, compared to 38% who tested positive for alcohol. Per TREDS, according to a 2014 study, there were 7,000 new Marijuana users per day. After alcohol, Marijuana was the most commonly detected drug amongst drivers killed in traffic crash in 2016, out of 44% of drivers killed in traffic crashes who tested positive for drugs, 41% had used a strain or Marijuana.
City Council 12 – 12 9/15/2026
Schedule A
Santa Ana Police Department is dedicated to reducing crashes, prevent fatalities, and providing a safer environment for all roadway users. Through targeted enforcement, public education, and invaluable trainings, we are committed to enhancing traffic safety and protecting the community. The funding from this grant would allow us to address critical resource gaps, improve Officer effectiveness, and perform our duties in a proficient way.
Performance Measures/Scope of Work (Proposed Solution)
Ensure 5 sworn Santa Ana Police Department Officers attend SFST and ARIDE by the end of Q4: aim to garner confidence in DUI investigations within patrol and the department as a whole.
Ensure 1 Officer attends DRE training.
Ensure 2 Officers attend SFST instructor school by the end of Q3.: this would allow our Department to better train our own Officers in the realm of DUID enforcement.
Send 6 SFST/ARIDE/DRE trained Officers or Supervisors to the IPTM Traffic Safety Symposium: this conference includes over 20 workshops dedicated to DUI and DUID enforcement to assist Officers in understanding these investigations and the court process following. This conference would be invaluable to the Officers attending and give them knowledge they could disseminate throughout the department.
The Santa Ana Police Department is dedicated to meeting the above listed goals and objects. In or to do so, the department will assign a minimum of 4 DUI Saturation Patrols each month. These patrols will be carried out by a DRE trained officer, if possible, and/or an Officer with SFST/ARIDE training. 48 DUI Saturation Patrols (Q1 = 12, Q2 = 12, Q3 = 12, Q4 = 12): Aim to reduce DUI/DUID deaths/crashes by at least 10%, which will improve roadway safety and protect the community. The reduction of DUI and DUID cases will be reported on a quarterly basis.
Project Performance Evaluation
The Santa Ana Police Department Traffic Unit will keep extensive notes and logs to document and evaluate the project over the duration of the grant period. This will assist in proper record keeping and quality control.
These stats will be monitored and adjusted if needed. Grant activity progress will be reported on a quarterly basis to ensure actions are being taken towards the set goals outlined. Department personnel will assist with providing quantitative measurements regarding the success of the activities. At the conclusion of the grant period, we will create a "Final Evaluation section in the fourth quarter. Using the data gathered we will provide a summary of the grant's accomplishments, challenges, and other significant activities. We would document if the department met, exceeded, or falls short of the objectives outlined. If an objective is not met, an explanation will be provided.
Program Sustainability
The Santa Ana Police Department's main goal is to reduce the number of DUI and DUID drivers on the road in order to foster safety in the community. We have been combating DUI related crashes through near-weekly DUI Saturation patrols funded through the OTS STEP Grant; however, the additional funds provided by the CHP Cannabis grant would allow us to conduct multiple DUI Saturation Patrols on nights with statistically higher DUI/DUID drivers. These funds would allow us to expand our reach and have more Officers in the field at once to saturate the city more thoroughly. The department is motived to utilize these funds in conjunction with funds from the OTS STEP Grant to make a positive impact on the battle against impaired driving in the City of Santa Ana.
The Santa Ana Police Department desires to send more Officers to SFST, ARIDE, and DRE classes in order to enhance the sustainability of DUI enforcement practices. The department only has 1 certified DRE at this time and the funds provided in this grant would assist with getting more Officers trained in advanced DUI subjects, including DRE.
With the uprise in traffic crashes involving DUI and DUID drivers, it is imperative for our Department to place an emphasis on enforcement and education. Due to the increasingly high costs of travel and lodging, the Santa Ana Police Department is limited on how many Officers they can send to trainings and seminars throughout the state.
City Council 12 – 13 9/15/2026
Schedule A
Administrative Support
The grant coordinators with this department have become efficient with meeting the outlined requirements of the OTS STEP grants awarded. Proper use of grant funds is a top priority for the coordinators and the management that oversee all grant related activities. One Officer in the Traffic Unit is assigned to oversee OTS STEP grant with multiple levels of supervision overseeing all final decision making. The coordinator is responsible for all scheduling and statistic tracking; however, the final decision to approve or deny requests for activities or purchases lands on the supervisor(s).
There is an open line of communication with the fiscal representatives of the Santa Ana Police Department.
Within the Traffic Unit, there is one civilian staff member who is in charge of the funding allocation and reimbursement submissions. This person works hand-in-hand with the fiscal department to ensure all work hours are accurate and funds are properly disseminated. Our department leadership has shown great support for the enforcement of DUI and DUID driving. The City Council has made it clear they are aware of the dangers of these actions and support the enforcement of traffic safety laws within the city. This department has the support and the necessary trained personnel to manage such a grant, and we are confident we will excel if we are fortunate enough to receive this funding.
The Traffic Division is currently staffed with 13 motor officers, 1 non-riding Corporal, 2 Sergeants, and 1 commander, as well as a cadre of civilian support staff. Each member of the division is willing and able to commit to the operations set forth by these grant funds. The members are dedicated to the traffic safety in our community.
City Council 12 – 14 9/15/2026
Schedule B
Grant Total $768,000.00
Detailed Budget Estimate
Award Number Organization/Agency Total Amount
30879 Santa Ana Police Department $768,000.00
Cost Category Line Item Name Total Cost to Grant
Personnel
DUI Saturation Patrol $768,000.00
Category Sub-Total $768,000.00
City Council 12 – 15 9/15/2026
Schedule B-1
Budget Narrative
Santa Ana Police Department
Prior to engaging in grant-funded Saturation Patrols, DUI Checkpoints, or other enforcement activities in areas where the grantee does not have primary traffic jurisdiction, the grantee should consult with the agency having primary traffic jurisdiction.
Personnel
DUI Saturation Patrol
$768,000.00
48 DUI Saturation Patrols. 12 Officers, 1 Sergeant per saturation, 10 hrs per officer. Total salary and benefits = $768,000.
Avg. Sergeant Overtime rate: $160/hr
Avg. Officer/Cpl Overtime rate: $120/hr
(1 Sergeant x $160/hr x 10 hrs x 48 operations = $76,800) (12 Officers x $120/hr x 10 hrs x 48 operations = $691,200) Signature:
Email:
Alexander Trinidad (Sep 2, 2026 17:37:03 PDT)
[email protected]
City Council 12 – 16 9/15/2026
091526 - Cannabis Tax Fund Grant
Program_Exhibit 1 (1) (2)
Final Audit Report 2026-09-03
Created: 2026-09-03
By: Kristin Andrade ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAArvdvaM3LN-Dpru2_3NJPEw3shxiuBOTf "091526 - Cannabis Tax Fund Grant Program_Exhibit 1 (1) (2)" History
Document created by Kristin Andrade ([email protected]) 2026-09-03 - 0:02:31 AM GMT
Document emailed to Alexander Trinidad ([email protected]) for signature 2026-09-03 - 0:03:32 AM GMT
Email viewed by Alexander Trinidad ([email protected]) 2026-09-03 - 0:03:44 AM GMT
Document e-signed by Alexander Trinidad ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2026-09-03 - 0:37:03 AM GMT - Time Source: server - Signature Appearance Selected: DRAW Agreement completed.
2026-09-03 - 0:37:03 AM GMT
City Council 12 – 17 9/15/2026
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.gov/pwa
Item # 13
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Award a Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Construction of Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project
AGENDA TITLE
Award of a Construction Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project (No. 23-6037) (General Fund & Non-General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $4,550,000 in the Active Transportation Program, State Grant-Direct (14817002-52025) revenue account and appropriate the same amount into the Active Transportation Program, Improvements Other than Building (14817613-66220) expenditure account. (Requires five affirmative votes)
2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Capital Improvement Program to include an additional $4,550,000 in construction funds for the Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project (No. 23-6037).
3. Approve the Project Cost Analysis for a total estimated construction delivery cost of $6,008,510, which includes $4,806,808 for the construction contract, $721,021 for contract administration, inspection, and testing, and $480,681 for unanticipated or unforeseen work.
4. Award a construction contract to Legion Contractors, Inc., the lowest responsible bidder, in accordance with the base bid in the amount of $4,806,808, subject to change orders, for construction of the Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project (No. 23-6037), for a term beginning September 15, 2026 and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract.
5. Determine that, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the recommended actions are exempt from further review. Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. 2023-118 will be filed for Project No. 23-6037.
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: No
City Council 13 – 1 9/15/2026
Award a Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Construction of Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project
September 15, 2026
DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for managing the City’s roads and transportation network which include arterial, residential, alley, and industrial streets.
The planning and improvements of this network are guided by the City’s General Plan Mobility Element, Active Transportation Plan, and Pavement Management Program.
Together, these plans and programs establish priorities for improving mobility and safety, expanding pedestrian and bicycle connectivity, and maintaining roadway infrastructure through data-driven pavement management. Consistent with these priorities, PWA identified and recommends street and multimodal improvements along Memory Lane and Flower Street (Exhibit 1).
The Memory Lane and Flower Street project limits include roadway segments in poor to fair condition. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI), which evaluates pavement conditions on a scale from 0-100, identifies PCI values of 56 along Flower Street from Memory Lane to Santiago Creek and 62 along Memory Lane from the Santa Ana River to Flower Street. No major rehabilitation has occurred within the project limits since the year 2000. Existing deficiencies include deteriorated pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, driveways, and curb ramps. Additionally, the project area has been the subject of community safety concerns related to speeding, pedestrian crossings, bicycle related collisions, and unlawful driver behaviors.
Since 2017, PWA staff have actively engaged with the Morrison Park and Fisher Park Neighborhood Associations through 15 community meetings to discuss traffic safety concerns, evaluate potential improvements along the project corridor, and to provide updates on the project's design and development. Community feedback received through these meetings helped inform the proposed safety and mobility improvements included in the final project design.
One of the primary safety concerns identified by residents involves the intersection of Memory Lane and Flower Street, where unsafe turning movements and vehicle spinouts, commonly referred to as “donuts,” have been reported. In response, staff developed design features that modify the intersection geometry and reduce the available roadway area to physically constrain and discourage these unsafe vehicle movements. Because the proposed design incorporates unique geometric features, staff worked closely with residents from both neighborhoods throughout the design process. Although initial opinions regarding the proposed improvements varied, staff developed and presented multiple design concepts based on community feedback, ultimately reaching consensus on the design incorporated into the Project.
The Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project (Project No. 23-6037) will improve street pavement through the reconstruction and rehabilitation of roadway pavement (both asphalt and Portland Cement Concrete), repair of concrete infrastructure, landscaping, and irrigation. It will also enhance pedestrian and bicycle City Council 13 – 2 9/15/2026
Award a Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Construction of Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project
September 15, 2026
safety through the installation of bulb-outs and protected bike lanes in both directions of travel. Pedestrian facility improvements will comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards.
The project incorporates traffic safety improvements, including modifications to the existing traffic signal at the intersection of Bristol Street and Memory Lane, the installation of rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) paired with raised crosswalks at the intersections of Memory Lane and Westwood Avenue and at Flower Street and Sharon Road, and upgraded traffic striping and pavement markings to improve roadway visibility and guide all users safely through the corridor. Additionally, the project will install drought-tolerant landscaping and irrigation at island buffers within the corridor.
Once completed, these improvements will enhance overall safety, ride quality, and the visual appearance of the street corridor.
Grant Funding
Given the cost and scale of the proposed improvements, PWA pursued funding through multiple competitive grant programs. Following unsuccessful applications to the Active Transportation Program (ATP) and Bicycle Corridor Improvement Program (BCIP) in 2018, staff submitted a subsequent ATP application on July 14, 2022. On June 28, 2023, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) notified the City that the Project had been selected for funding. The ATP award provides funding for environmental, design, and construction activities, including traffic signal modifications, enhanced and raised crosswalks, reduced curb-return radii, ADA-compliant curb ramps, and Class II and Class IV bicycle facilities. Funding for the design phase was previously approved by the City Council as part of the Fiscal Year 2023-24 Capital Improvement Program. Through this staff report, staff recommends recognizing $4,550,000 in ATP construction funding and amending the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program accordingly. The grant requires the Project to be completed by January 31, 2028.
Project Advertisement and Contractor Procurement
To provide an opportunity for local vendors to submit bids, the City notified a total of 3,137 regional vendors via PlanetBids, many of which are Santa Ana based.
Furthermore, staff specifically reached out to Santa Ana vendors to encourage their participation in bids. A total of seven (7) bids were received. Zero (0) bids were received from Santa Ana contractors.
As legally required, a Notice Inviting Bids was advertised in the Orange County Register newspaper on June 12, 2026. The project was also advertised in PlanetBids from June 9, 2026 to June 30, 2026. Bids were received electronically via PlanetBids on June 30, 2026. No bid protest was submitted by any of the bidders during the bid protest period.
City Council 13 – 3 9/15/2026
Award a Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Construction of Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project
September 15, 2026
Copies of construction plans, contracts, specifications, and all related reference materials (such as The Greenbook) are available for public review at the Public Works Agency Central Files office located in City Hall.
Bid Results Summary
RANK BIDDER’S NAME LOCATION BID
1 Legion Contractors, Inc. Los Angeles, CA $4,806,808.00 2 U.S. Builders & Consultants Irvine, CA $5,044,800.00
3 Aster Construction Services,
Inc. Los Angeles, CA $5,101,201.06
4 Hardy & Harper, Inc. Lake Forest, CA $5,150,000.00
5 Westcoast Public Works, Inc. Woodland Hills, CA $5,601,421.00 6 Vido Samarzich, Inc. Santa Ana, CA $5,675,000.00
7 Excel Paving Co. Long Beach, CA $6,148,565.00
A total of seven (7) bids were received and deemed responsive. Legion Contractors, Inc. submitted the lowest responsive bid in the amount of $4,806,808.00 (Exhibit 2). Following review of the bid and contractor references, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. (Exhibit 3).
Legion Contractors, Inc. has successfully completed projects as a prime contractor in the City of Santa Ana within the past two years, including Outdoor Library at Jerome Park and Bristol-Tolliver Street Urban Greening Project. Based on the contractor’s satisfactory performance on these projects, staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the construction of the project.
Project Delivery
In addition to the construction contract, the total project delivery cost includes a budget allocation for construction administration, inspection, and testing. Construction administration and inspection may be performed by either staff or consultants and includes construction management, inspection of the contractor’s work for compliance with contract requirements and quality standards, materials testing, and administration of applicable labor compliance requirements.
As indicated in the Cost Analysis and as summarized in the table below, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $6,008,510.
City Council 13 – 4 9/15/2026
Award a Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Construction of Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project
September 15, 2026
Project Item Total
Construction Contract Bid Amount $4,806,808
Construction Administration $384,545
Inspection $240,340
Testing $96,136
Unanticipated or Unforeseen Work $480,681
TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION DELIVERY
COST $6,008,510
Project Schedule and Contract Time
The project completion date is June 2027, barring unforeseeable conditions such as rain, natural disasters, or other delays beyond the control of the City and of the Contractor. The contract time for this project is 120 working days, as specified in the bid documents. Working days are counted in accordance with the City’s Standard Specifications, which exclude weekends, City-observed holidays, and inclement weather days that prevent work.
The projected completion dates based on the schedule is June 2027, which is within the allotted 120 working days. If the contractor fails to deliver on time, they will be assessed a penalty of $5,200 per calendar day as specified in the bid documents.
The actual completion date will depend on the contractor’s construction schedule, material procurement lead times, field conditions, and unforeseen delays. The anticipated project schedule is summarized below;
Project Milestones
Milestone Estimated
Completion Date
Notes
Administrative Startup September 2026 Contract execution, bonds, insurance
Material Procurement December 2026 Procurement may take place concurrently with construction.
Contractor Mobilization November 2026 Start of construction activities Project Completion June 2027 Based on 120 working days
Project Phasing
The Project will be constructed in a single phase in accordance with the scope of work established in the contract documents. The contractor will be responsible for scheduling and sequencing construction activities based on their proposed means and methods and within the contract time specified in the bid documents.
City Council 13 – 5 9/15/2026
Award a Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Construction of Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project
September 15, 2026
Public Outreach
During the Project’s planning and design phases, City staff met with the Morrison Park and Fisher Park Neighborhood Associations to present proposed improvements, provide project updates, and collect community input, as described above. Upon Council approval of recommended actions and prior to start of construction, Staff will notify area residents and businesses of upcoming construction activities and distribute informational materials and mail post cards identifying project information and resources for questions and concerns. Staff will also attend future Neighborhood Association meetings to provide an update on the project.
The contractor is required to issue construction notices to adjacent residents and businesses at least two weeks before construction begins. The contractor will also install signage at the project site indicating project details and appropriate contact information.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the recommended actions are exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15301(b) and 15301(c) of the CEQA Guidelines for projects consisting of repair and maintenance of existing public facilities and existing highways, streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities. The proposed project continues to meet these parameters of the CEQA Guidelines, and Categorical Exemption Environmental Review No. ER-2023-118 will be filed for Project 23-6037 (Exhibit 4).
FISCAL IMPACT
As indicated in the Cost Analysis, the estimated total construction delivery cost of the project is $6,008,510. With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustments, all funds are available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2026-27. Any remaining balances not expended at the end of the fiscal year will be presented to City Council for approval of carryovers into Fiscal Year 2027-2028.
The proposed contract authorizes staff a maximum of 10% in construction contract change orders for unanticipated or unforeseen work. Staff will return to City Council for authorization and appropriation of additional funding if necessary.
With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustment, $4,550,000 in Active Transportation Program grant funds will be recognized in the Traffic System Management Grant, State Grant-Direct revenue account (No. 14817002-52025) and appropriated for spending into the Active Transportation Program, Improvements Other than Building, Account (No. 14817613-66220).
Approval of the requests to reallocate funds will provide a total of $683,037 in unspent funds from Project 26-6716.
City Council 13 – 6 9/15/2026
Award a Contract to Legion Contractors, Inc. for the Construction of Memory Lane and Flower Street Improvements Project
September 15, 2026
Funds were budgeted and available in the following account(s) for use in Fiscal Year 2026-2027 and will be carried forward for use in Fiscal Year 2027-2028, subject to City Council approval of the carryover.
Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit – Account
No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account Description Amount
CURRENT BUDGET
2025-26 01117620-66220
(23-6037) General Fund
PW-Traffic/Trans
Service Enhancement,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$775,473
APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT
2026-27 14817613-66220
(23-6037)
Traffic System
Management
Grant
Active Transportation
Program,
Improvements Other
Than Building
$4,550,000
REALLOCATION
2025-26
05917665-66220
(From 26-6716
to 23-6037)
Select Street
Construction
HUTA Gas TaxRMRA, Improvements
Other Than Building
$683,037
TOTAL $6,008,510
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Location Map
2. Bid Proposal
3. Construction Contract
4. Environmental Determination
5. Capital Improvement Project Worksheet
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Executive Director of Public Works Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 13 – 7 9/15/2026
PWA
SANTA ANA
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
Project No. 23-6037:
Memory Lane and Flower Street Bikeway and
Traffic Calming
Exhibit 1
LEGEND:
- PROJECT LIMITS
City Council 13 – 8
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO.: 23-6037
MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING P-1 of P-21
BID PROPOSAL
TO: CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA
FROM:
REQUIREMENT:
The undersigned bidder declares that they have carefully examined the location of the proposed work, that they have examined the Contract Documents in its entirety and hereby proposes to furnish all material and do all the work required to complete the said work in accordance with said plans (if any) and the specifications for the unit price(s) or lump sum(s) set forth in the following schedule:
Item Description Qty Unit Unit
Price
Amount
1 Unclassified Excavation * 1,008 CY $ $
2 Asphalt Concrete * 588 TN $ $
3 Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) 2,730 TN $ $
4 Cold Mill (2”) 205,000 SF $ $
5 Rubberized Emulsion Aggregate Slurry
(REAS) Type II *
60 TN $ $
6 PCC Street Removal 210 CY $ $
7 Construct 7” PCC with (3-day) Cure
Including Dowels
210 CY $ $
8 PCC Sidewalk (T=4”) 9,240 SF $ $
9 PCC Curb Ramp 3,990 SF $ $
10 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-8) 840 LF $ $
11 PCC Curb and Gutter (Type A-2-6) 525 LF $ $
12 PCC Driveway (T=8”) 1,155 SF $ $
13 Cross Gutter (T=8”) 3,885 SF $ $
14 Monolithic PCC Bike Lane (T=6”)
(Including Raised Buffer)
4,960 LF $ $
Legion Contractors Inc.
300 63,000
720 151,200
18 166,320
28 111,720
120 100,800
110 57,750
25 28,875
165 166,320
240 141,120
195 532,350
0.65 133,250
1,500 90,000
35 135,975
140 694,400
Exhibit 2
City Council 13 – 9 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO.: 23-6037
MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING P-2 of P-21
Item Description Qty Unit Unit
Price
Amount
15 PCC Bike Lane (T=8”) 120 LF $ $
16 PCC Bike Lane (T=6”)
(Adjacent to Bioretention Basin)
239 LF $ $
17 Concrete Rolled Curb 320 LF $ $
18 PCC Type B-1 Curb 1,360 LF $ $
19 Colored Concrete (Red Brick) – Topcast
Exposed Aggregate Finish
830 SF $ $
20 PCC Raised Crosswalk 2 EA $ $
21 Steel Plate (Slip Resistant) 8 EA $ $
22 Tree Removal 3 EA $ $
23 Neighborhood Entry Monument Removal 2 EA $ $
24 Adjust Water Valve Frame and Cover 24 EA $ $
25 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover 24 EA $ $
26 Adjust #6 Pullbox to Finished Grade 4 EA $ $
27 Local Depression. C.S.A STD. 305 1 EA $ $
28 Reconstruct Catch Basin Top Slab
(Including Local Depression)
2 EA $ $
29 Parkway Culvert (Type A) per CSA Std.
318
2 EA $ $
30 Crushed Miscellaneous Base (CMB) * 250 TN $ $
31 Irrigation 1 LS $ $
32 Landscape 1 LS $ $
33 Irrigation & Landscape Local
Repairs/Modifications (Curb Extension
Areas) *
1 LS $ $
34 Landscape Maintenance Period (90-Days) 1 LS $ $
110 35,200
80 108,800
25 20,750
50,000 100,000
15,000 120,000
1,500 4,500
5,000 10,000
2,000 48,000
2,000 48,000
1,500 6,000
7,000 7,000
10,000 20,000
15,000 30,000
110 27,500
145 17,400
135 32,265
115,000 115,000
135,000 135,000
40,000 40,000
10,000 10,000
City Council 13 – 10 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO.: 23-6037
MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING P-3 of P-21
Item Description Qty Unit Unit
Price
Amount
35 Signing and Striping 1 LS $ $
36 Green Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) 250 Kits (Approx.
10,000 SF
Coverage)
EA $ $
37 Project Advertisement Sign 3 EA $ $
38 Adjust Survey Monument 11 EA $ $
39 Bioretention Basin 1 LS $ $
40 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) - Risk Level 1
1 LS $ $
41 Remove Existing and Install New Water
Meter Frame and Cover
2 EA $ $
42 New Fire Hydrant Assembly 3 EA $ $
43 Furnish and Install New Water Valve
Frame and Cover
10 EA $ $
44 Furnish and Install New Neighborhood
Entry Monument (Including (1) Water
Proof Solar Powered Light Fixtures and (1)
Remote Solar Panel)
1 LS $ $
45 Adjust Manhole Frame and Cover (per
O.C.S.D Std. S-050A, S-055 and S-055A)
8 EA $ $
46 Furnish and Install New Manhole Frame
and Cover
2 EA $ $
47 Construction Permit 1 LS $17,813 $ 17,813
48 Remove Existing Fire Hydrant Assembly 4 EA $ $
49 Remove Existing Gate Valve Frame and
Cover
3 EA $ $
50 Construct 6” Resilient Gate Valve 3 EA $ $
51 Traffic Signal Modification at Bristol
Street and Memory Lane
1 LS $ $
52 Install 2” PVC Conduit 30 LF $ $
53 Install 3” PVC Conduit 100 LF $ $
54 Install No. 6 Pull Box 8 EA $ $
10,000 SF
5,000 15,000
2,500 27,500
60,000 60,000
60,000 60,000
2,000 4,000
20,000 60,000
4,500 45,000
40,000 40,000
3,500 28,000
5,000 10,000
6,500 26,000
10,000 30,000
40,000 120,000
185,000 185,000
11 110,000
310,000 310,000
100 3,000
100 3,000
2,000 16,000
City Council 13 – 11 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO.: 23-6037
MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING P-4 of P-21
Item Description Qty Unit Unit
Price
Amount
55 Install Type E Traffic Signal Loop
Detector
2 EA $ $
56 Pothole Traffic Signal Pole Location
for Utility Conflicts
8 EA $ $
57 Temporary Overhead Wiring at Traffic
Signal
1 LS $ $
58 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Modification at Flower Street and
Sharon Road
1 LS $ $
59 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Installation at Memory Lane and
Westwood Avenue
1 LS $ $
60 As-Builts 1 LS $ $
TOTAL BASE BID $
The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add-alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the “25%” limit as stated in Section 7-3.5 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. † This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications.
TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within one hundred and twenty (120) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. Upon issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall immediately place order for long-lead time items.
The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $5,200 per calendar day.
5,000 5,000
2,500 5,000
2,000 16,000
25,000 25,000
30,000 30,000
40,000 40,000
4,806,808
City Council 13 – 12 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO.: 23-6037
MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING P-5 of P-21
Name of Firm
Signature of BIDDER
Title
(If an individual, so state. If a firm or co-partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) Secretary
Saba Khoubanshargh
Legion Contractors Inc.
Legion Contractors, Inc. - CA Corporation
Amir Movafegh - President, Treasurer and Manager
Saba Khoubanshargh - Secretary
City Council 13 – 13 9/15/2026
rev. 09/01/2017 Page 1 of 3
CITY OF SANTA ANA
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
PROJECT 23-6037
MEMORY LANE & FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING This CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT is made and entered into this 15th day of September, 2026 by and between the City of Santa Ana, California, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter “CITY”), and Legion Contractors, Inc. (hereinafter “CONTRACTOR”).
WITNESSETH:
The CITY and the CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows:
1. CONTRACTOR agrees to perform all the work and furnish all the materials at its own cost and expense necessary to construct and complete in a good and workmanlike manner and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of the CITY, Memory Lane & Flower Street Bikeway and Traffic Calming (hereinafter referred to as the “WORK OF IMPROVEMENT”) identified in and in accordance with the Contract Documents prepared by the City’s Public Works Agency and approved by the City Council.
2. The complete Construction Contract consists of the “Contract Documents” as defined by the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and which include the following:
• Notice Inviting Bids
• Information to Bidders
• Bid Proposal
• Bid Bond
• Contract Form
• Contract Bonds
• General Provisions
• Special Provisions
• Technical Provisions and Project Plans
• Community Workforce Agreement
• Appendices
In case of conflict between the Contract Documents, the precedence of documents shall be as established in the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction.
3. CITY agrees to pay and CONTRACTOR agrees to accept in full payment to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT the sum total amount not to exceed Four Million Eight Hundred Six Thousand Eight Hundred Eight and No Cents ($4,806,808.00), as set forth and identified in the itemized BID PROPOSAL uploaded by the Contractor to PlanetBids, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit “A”.
The BID PROPOSAL contains a schedule of unit price(s) or lump sum(s) based on approximate quantities only, and the City does not expressly or by implication agree that the actual amount of work will correspond therewith, but reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of any class or portion of the work or to omit portions of the work as may be deemed necessary or advisable.
Exhibit 3
City Council 13 – 14 9/15/2026
4. CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT within the time specified in the Time for Completion of Improvements and Liquidated Damages section of the BID PROPOSAL (Exhibit “B”) including commencing construction within the timeframe therein specified after issuance of a Notice to Proceed.
5. The CONTRACTOR will pay, and will require all subcontractors to pay, all employees on the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT a salary or wage at least equal to the prevailing salary or wage established for such work as set forth in the wage determinations for this work in accordance with applicable State and Federal law.
6. If applicable, the CONTRACTOR shall adhere to the CITY’S Community Workforce Agreement (CWA), a pre-hire collective bargaining agreement, which establishes the labor relations policies and procedures for CONTRACTOR to follow in the crafts persons employed to complete the WORK OF IMPROVEMENT as more fully described in the CWA. The CWA may be found on the City’s website at: http://www.santa-ana.org/pwa/documents/CWA.pdf
7. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish two bonds to be approved by the CITY, one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price, to guarantee the faithful performance of the work (Performance Bond), and one in the amount of One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Contract price to guarantee payment of all claims for labor and materials furnished (Payment Bond). This Contract shall not become effective until such bonds are supplied to and approved by the CITY.
8. CONTRACTOR shall, prior to the release of the performance and payment bonds or the retention payment, furnish a warranty performance and payment bond (Warranty Bond). Said Warranty Bond shall also be required as a condition of project acceptance. For projects up to Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) or Twenty Percent (20%) of the final contract price. For projects above Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000), the Warranty Bond amount shall be the greater of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) or Ten Percent (10%) of the final contract price.
9. CONTRACTOR shall, after award of this Contract, furnish Certificates of Liability Insurance and Worker’s Compensation Insurance as outlined in the General Provisions, to be approved by the CITY.
10. INDEMNIFICATION.
To the fullest extent allowed by law, CONTRACTOR and its Subcontractors hereby agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless CITY, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents, employees, representatives and volunteers (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Indemnitees"), through legal counsel acceptable to CITY, from and against any liability, claims, actions, costs, damages or losses, including reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, for injury, including death to any person or damage to any property, arising directly or indirectly from, or in any manner relating to, any of the following:
(i) Performance or nonperformance of the Work of Improvement by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier;
(ii) Performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of any of the obligations under the Contract Documents; City Council 13 – 15 9/15/2026
(iii) The construction activities of CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, either on the project site or on other properties;
(iv) The payment or nonpayment by CONTRACTOR of any of its Subcontractors of any lower tier, for Work of Improvement performed on or off the project site; and (v) Any personal injury, property damage or economic loss to third persons related to and arising from the performance or nonperformance by CONTRACTOR or its Subcontractors of any lower tier, of the Work of Improvement.
(vi) The indemnity obligations of Subcontractors provided by this Section shall be included in all subcontract documents issued by CONTRACTOR.
Nothing in the Contract Documents shall be construed to give rise to any implied right of indemnity in favor of CONTRACTOR against CITY or any other Indemnitee.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Construction Contract on the day and year first above written.
ATTEST: CITY OF SANTA ANA
JENNIFER L. HALL ALVARO NUNEZ
City Clerk City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SONIA R. CARVALHO CONTRACTOR:
City Attorney Legion Contractors, Inc.
By:
KYLE NELLESEN BY:
Assistant City Attorney TITLE:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
RODOLFO ROSAS, P.E.
Acting Executive Director
Public Works Agency
Amir Movafegh
President
Rodolfo Rosas (Aug 31, 2026 15:45:38 CDT)
City Council 13 – 16 9/15/2026
City Council 13 – 17 9/15/2026
City Council 13 – 18 9/15/2026
City Council 13 – 19 9/15/2026
City Council 13 – 20 9/15/2026
City Council 13 – 21 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO.: 23-6037
MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING P-4 of P-21
Item Description Qty Unit Unit
Price
Amount
55 Install Type E Traffic Signal Loop
Detector
2 EA $ $
56 Pothole Traffic Signal Pole Location
for Utility Conflicts
8 EA $ $
57 Temporary Overhead Wiring at Traffic
Signal
1 LS $ $
58 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Modification at Flower Street and
Sharon Road
1 LS $ $
59 Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Installation at Memory Lane and
Westwood Avenue
1 LS $ $
60 As-Builts 1 LS $ $
TOTAL BASE BID $
The lowest responsible bidder shall be selected based on the total base bid. The City reserves the right to award the Base Bid, and any, all, or none of the add-alternate bid items (if any). * The quantity for this bid item is shown for bid comparison only. This bid item shall not be subject to the “25%” limit as stated in Section 7-3.5 of the Standard Specifications. The actual amount for this item will be dictated by the actual quantity used, and the Agency reserves the right to increase or decrease the quantity of this item accordingly. † This bid item is considered a Specialty Item per Section 3-2 of the Standard Specifications.
TIME FOR COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES The undersigned bidder hereby proposes to complete the Work for the total base bid amount shown above, within one hundred and twenty (120) working days after the commencement date stated in the Notice to Proceed. Upon issuance of the Notice to Proceed, Contractor shall immediately place order for long-lead time items.
The liquidated damages amount, in lieu of the amount specified in Subsection 6-9 of the Standard Specifications, shall be $5,200 per calendar day.
5,000 5,000
2,500 5,000
2,000 16,000
25,000 25,000
30,000 30,000
40,000 40,000
4,806,808
City Council 13 – 22 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PROPOSAL
PROJECT NO.: 23-6037
MEMORY LANE AND FLOWER STREET BIKEWAY AND TRAFFIC CALMING P-5 of P-21
Name of Firm
Signature of BIDDER
Title
(If an individual, so state. If a firm or co-partnership, state the firm name and give the names of all individual co-partners composing the firm. If a corporation, state legal name of corporation, and names of President, Secretary, Treasurer and Manager, thereof.) Secretary
Saba Khoubanshargh
Legion Contractors Inc.
Legion Contractors, Inc. - CA Corporation
Amir Movafegh - President, Treasurer and Manager
Saba Khoubanshargh - Secretary
City Council 13 – 23 9/15/2026
09 15 26 PWA 05_Exh 3 Construction Contract
Final Audit Report 2026-08-31
Created: 2026-08-31
By: Skylar Wilk ([email protected])
Status: Signed
Transaction ID: CBJCHBCAABAAGHHmUlIs_fCeVt5DuJodcPjwG-XzwJEw "09 15 26 PWA 05_Exh 3 Construction Contract" History
Document created by Skylar Wilk ([email protected])
2026-08-31 - 6:42:30 PM GMT
Document emailed to Rudy Rosas ([email protected]) for signature 2026-08-31 - 6:42:38 PM GMT
Email viewed by Rudy Rosas ([email protected])
2026-08-31 - 6:46:33 PM GMT
Signer Rudy Rosas ([email protected]) entered name at signing as Rodolfo Rosas 2026-08-31 - 8:45:36 PM GMT
Document e-signed by Rodolfo Rosas ([email protected]) Signature Date: 2026-08-31 - 8:45:38 PM GMT - Time Source: server - Signature Appearance Selected: MOBILE_DRAW Agreement completed.
2026-08-31 - 8:45:38 PM GMT
City Council 13 – 24 9/15/2026
TO BE FILED
Exhibit 4
City Council 13 – 25 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA FY 26/27CIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WORKSHEET
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Construction of bikeway, ADA compliant sidewalks, curb ramps, bulb-outs (curb extensions), raised medians/crosswalks, traffic signal modification and channelization on Memory Lane and Flower Street.
PROJECT NEED:
The City of Santa Ana and City of Orange designed to increase bicyclist and pedestrian safety and mobility.
PROJECT TITLE:
Memory Lane and Flower Street
Bikeway
PROJECT CATEGORY:
Traffic Improvements
Street/Bridge Improvements &
Widening
LOCATION MAP
AGENCY: DIVISION: CONTACT: DATE:
Public Works CIP Engineering Gilbert Castillo, Senior Engineer 11-Aug-2026 PROJECT COSTS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 Construction 4,806,808 - - - - - -
Contingency 480,681 - - - - - -
Engineering 721,021 - - - - - -
TOTAL 6,008,510 - - - - - -
SOURCE OF FUNDS FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 ATP 4,550,000 - - - - - -
GENERAL FUND 775,473 - - - - - -
RMRA SB1 683,037 - - - - - -
TOTAL 6,008,510 - - - - - -
Exhibit 5
City Council 13 – 26 9/15/2026
Public Works Agency
www.santa-ana.gov/pw
Item # 14
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Staff Report
September 15, 2026
TOPIC: Fuel Delivery and Supply Services
AGENDA TITLE
First Amendment to the Agreement with AAA Oil, Inc. for Fuel Delivery and Supply Services (Non-General Fund)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a First Amendment to the agreement with AAA Oil, Inc., for an additional amount of $900,000 to support fuel delivery and supply services for the total contracted amount not to exceed $7,400,000 for the remaining term expiring December 19, 2027 (Agreement No. A-2026-XXX).
2. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $450,000 in the City Yard Operations, Gas & Diesel Dept Charge Back revenue account (No. 08517002- 56001) and appropriate the same amount into the City Yard Operations, Gas & Diesel expenditure account (No. 08517138-63300). (Requires five affirmative votes.)
GOVERNMENT CODE §84308 APPLIES: Yes
DISCUSSION
The Public Works Agency (PWA) is responsible for purchasing and dispensing fuel at the fueling stations located at the City’s Corporate Yard and Santa Ana Police Department. The City maintains a fleet of over 600 vehicles across City departments that rely on these fueling stations for unleaded gasoline and diesel fuel. The City also uses diesel to power emergency backup generators at critical City facilities and for certain construction projects requiring on-site fuel delivery.
Fuel consumption has increased due to growth in heavy fleet equipment used in construction activity, increased reliance on diesel-powered emergency generators, and fuel requirements associated with major capital improvement and infrastructure projects.
For example, the Memorial Park Aquatic Center project required on-site diesel fuel delivery to support construction equipment and other project operations. Similarly, improvements at the Garthe Water Pump Station required temporary generators to maintain facility operations during electrical rehabilitation. Temporary generators City Council 14 – 1 9/15/2026
Fuel Delivery and Supply Services
September 15, 2026
allowed capital improvement projects to stay on schedule and water distribution facilities to remain operational while permanent electrical improvements were completed, ensuring continuous, uninterrupted delivery of water services to customers.
In addition to increased fuel consumption, fuel prices have experienced significant increases attributed to a combination of global crude oil prices, refinery operations and outages, and other supply and market conditions. In the last three years, the City’s unleaded and diesel fuel costs have risen by 32% and 39%, respectively.
On December 20, 2022, the City Council approved an agreement with AAA Oil, Inc. to provide fuel delivery and supply services for the term beginning December 20, 2022 through December 19, 2025, with one two-year extension option (Exhibit 1). Since that time, AAA Oil, Inc. has provided reliable and consistent service to support the City’s fleet, emergency power systems, and various City projects. Therefore, the City exercised the two-year extension option, which expires December 19, 2027 (Exhibit 2).
The current agreement provides a total annual amount not to exceed $1.3M for a total not to exceed amount of $6.5M for the duration of the contract, including all extensions for routine fuel expenditures. The City has expended over $1.2M during the fourth term of the agreement, with less than $100,000 remaining through December 19, 2026. Due to increasing fuel prices and demand, staff recommends approval of the First Amendment to the agreement with AAA Oil, Inc., increasing the annual not-to-exceed amount by $450,000 for a total amended contract amount not to exceed $7.4M (Exhibit 3). The additional contract capacity will provide sufficient flexibility to address increased fuel prices and meet fluctuating fuel demands associated with City fleet operations, emergency generators, and citywide construction and infrastructure projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
With the approval of the requested appropriation adjustment, $450,000 of fuel revenue will be recognized in the City Yard Operations-Gas & Diesel Dept Charge Back revenue account and appropriated for spending in the City Yard Operations-Gas & Diesel expenditure account. All funds will be available for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2026- 2027. Subsequent fiscal year funding will be included in the proposed budgets for City Council consideration.
City Council 14 – 2 9/15/2026
Fuel Delivery and Supply Services
September 15, 2026
Fiscal
Year
Accounting
Unit – Account
No.
(Project No.)
Fund
Description
Accounting Unit,
Account
Description
Amount
REQUESTED AMENDMENT AMOUNT
2026-27 08517138-
63300
City Yard
Operations
City Yard
Operations, Gas &
Diesel
$450,000
2027-28 08517138-
63300
City Yard
Operations
City Yard
Operations, Gas &
Diesel
$450,000
AMENDED TOTAL $900,000
EXHIBIT(S)
1. Agreement with AAA Oil, Inc., A-2022-248
2. Extension of Agreement A-2022-248
3. First Amendment to the Agreement with AAA Oil, Inc.
Submitted By: Rodolfo Rosas, P.E., Acting Executive Director of Public Works Approved By: Alvaro Nuñez, City Manager
City Council 14 – 3 9/15/2026
A- 2022- 248
5. 1- 2023
FEQ 7 H23 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND
tyw,&-)
r"
AAA
k" V1 A
OIL, INC. TO PROVIDE GASOLINE AND DIESEL SUPPLY AND DELIVERY A+ iobONAJ) THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 20" day of December 2022 by and between AAA Oil, Inc. (" Contractor"), and the City of Santa Ana, a charter city and municipal corporation organized and existing under the Constitution andlaws of theState of California ("City"). RECITALS A.
The City desires to retain a Contractor having special skill and expertise tosupply the City' s annual gasoline and diesel fuel needs. B.
On September 13, 2022, the City issued Request for Proposal ("RFP") No. 22- 110, by which it sought Contractors toprovide gasoline and diesel fuel delivery and supply services tothe City. C.
Contractor submitted aresponsive proposal that was among those selected bythe City. Contractor represents that Contractor is a wholesale distributor of diesel, gasoline, LNG/ natural gas, and other petroleum products and is able and willing toprovide such services tothe City. D.
In undertaking theperformance ofthis Agreement, Contractor represents thatitis knowledgeable in its field and that any services performed by Contractor under this Agreement willbe performed in compliance with such standards as may reasonably be expected from aprofessional contracting firm in the field. NOW
THEREFORE, inconsideration ofthe mutual and respective promises, and subject tothe terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows: 1.
SCOPE OF SERVICES On
an as -needed basis, Contractor shall perform the tasks and obligations including all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidental customary work required tofully and adequately complete the services described and set forth in Scope of Services — Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated byreference and ("RFP") No. 22- 110 — Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated byreference. 2.
COMPENSATION a.
City neither warrants nor guarantees any minimum or maximum compensation to Contractor under this Agreement. Contractor shall be paid only for actual services performed under this Agreement atthe rates and charges identified in Exhibit C. The total annual sum to be expended under the term of this Agreement shall not exceed $1,300, 000 during each year of the Agreement. The total sum to be expended under this Agreement for the entire term shall not exceed $6,500, 000. b.
Payment by City shall be made within forty-five (45) days following receipt of proper invoice evidencing work performed, subject to City accounting procedures. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standards of performance set forth in the Exhibit 1
City Council 14 – 4 9/15/2026
Recitals and Scope of Work, which may reasonably be expected by City.
3. TERM
This Agreement shall commence on the date first written above and terminate on December 19, 2025, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 17, below. The term of this Agreement may be extended for one ( 1) two ( 2) year period upon a writing executed by the City Manager and City Attorney.
4. PREVAILING WAGES
Contractor is aware ofthe requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (" Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on " public works" and " maintenance" projects. Ifthe services being performed are part of an applicable public works" or " maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and the total compensation is $ 1, 000 or more, Contractor agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws.
Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Contractor shall, during the entire term of this Agreement, be construed to be an independent contractor and not an employee ofthe City. This Agreement is not intended nor shall it be construed to create an employer -employee relationship, a joint venture relationship, or to allow the City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Contractor performs the services which are the subject matter ofthis Agreement; however, the services to be provided by Contractor shall be provided in a manner consistent with all applicable standards and regulations governing such services. Contractor shall pay all salaries and wages, employer' s social security taxes, unemployment insurance and similar taxes relating to employees and shall be responsible for all applicable withholding taxes.
6. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS
This Agreement creates a non- exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor under this Agreement (" Documents & Data"). Contractor shall require all subcontractors to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contractor represents and warrants that Contractor has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data. Contractor makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were provided to Contractor by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City' s sole risk. 2 City Council 14 – 5 9/15/2026
7. INSURANCE
Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration ofthe contract insurance against claimsfor injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with theperformance ofthe work hereunder and the results of that work by the Contractor, his agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.
MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE
Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
Commercial General Liability ( CGL): Insurance Services Office Form CG 00 01 covering CGL on an " occurrence" basis, including products and completed operations, property damage, bodily injury and personal & advertising injury with limits no less than $2, 000,000 per occurrence. If a general aggregate limit applies, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/ location ( ISO CG 25 03 or 25 04) or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
2. Automobile Liability: Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering any auto Code 1), or if Contractor has no owned autos, hired ( Code 8) and non -owned ( Code 9) autos, with limit no less than $ 1, 000, 000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
3. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, with Statutory Limits, and Employer' s Liability Insurance with limit of no less than $ 1, 000, 000 per accident for bodily injury or disease.
4. Contractors Pollution Liability and/ or Errors & Omissions applicable to the work being performed, with a limit no less than $ 2, 000, 000 per claim or occurrence and $ 2, 000, 000 aggregate per policy period of one year. Ifthe contractor maintains broader coverage and/ or higher limits than the minimums shown above, the City requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/ or the higher limits maintained by the contractor. Any available insurance proceeds in excess ofthe specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the City.
Self -Insured Retentions
Self -insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. The City may require the Contractor or Consultant to purchase coverage with a lower retention or provide proof of ability to pay losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses within the retention. The policy language shall provide, or be endorsed to provide, that the self -insured retention may be satisfied by either the named insured or City.
Other Insurance Provisions
A. The General Liability, Automobile Liability, Contractors Pollution Liability, and/ or Asbestos Pollution policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
City Council 14 – 6 9/15/2026
1. The City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of the Contractor including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations. General liability coverage can be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Contractor' s insurance ( at least as broad as ISO Form CG 20 10, CG 1185 or both CG 20 10, CG 20 26, CG 20 33, or CG 20 38; and CG 20 37 forms if later revisions used).
2. For any claims related to this project, the Contractor' s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance coverage at least as broad as ISO CG 20 0104 13 as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor' s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
3. Each insurance policy required above shall provide that coverage shall not be canceled, except with notice to the City.
B. The Automobile Liability policy shall be endorsed to include Transportation Pollution Liability insurance, covering materials to be transported by Contractor pursuant to the contract. This coverage may also be provided on the Contractors Pollution Liability policy.
C. If General Liability, Contractors Pollution Liability and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/ or Errors Omissions coverages are written on a claims -made form:
1. The retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date ofthe contract or the beginning of contract work.
2. Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five 5) years after completion ofthe contract of work.
3. If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made
4. policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five ( 5) years after completion of contract work.
5. A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.
6. Ifthe services involve lead -based paint or asbestos identification / remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability shall not contain lead -based paint or asbestos exclusions. If the services involve mold identification / remediation, the Contractors Pollution Liability shall not contain a mold exclusion and the definition of "Pollution" shall include microbial matter including mold.
Acceptability ofInsurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers authorized to conduct business in the state with a current A.M.
Best rating of no less than ANIIif admitted inthe State of California. Verification of Coverage Contractor
shall furnish the City with original CertificatesofInsurance including all required amendatory endorsements (or copies of the applicable policy language effecting coverage required by this clause) and a copy of the Declarations and Endorsement Page of the CGL policy listing all policy endorsements to City before work begins. However, failure toobtain the required documents prior tothe work beginning shall not waive the Contractor' s obligation toprovide them. The City reserves the right City Council 14 – 7 9/15/2026
to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements required by these specifications, at any time.
Waiver of Subrogation
Contractor hereby grants to City a waiver of subrogation which any insurer may acquire against City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, from Contractor by virtue of the payment of any loss.
Contractor agrees to obtain any endorsement that may be necessary to affect this waiver of subrogation but this provision applies regardless of whether or not the City has received a waiver of subrogation endorsement from the insurer. The Workers' Compensation policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor ofthe City for all work performed by the Contractor, its employees, agents, and subcontractors.
Subcontractors
Contractor shall require and verify that all subcontractors maintain insurance meeting all the requirements stated herein, and Contractor shall ensure that City is an additional insured on insurance required from subcontractors. For CGL coverage subcontractors shall provide coverage with a format least as broad as CG 20 38 04 13.
Special Risks or Circumstances
City reserves the right to modify these requirements, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances.
8. INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor agrees to defend, and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, employees, contractors, special counsel, and representatives from liability: ( 1) for personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief arising out of claims for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage, which may arise from the negligent operations of the Contractor or its subcontractors, agents, employees, or other persons acting on their behalf which relates to the services described in section 1 of this Agreement; and ( 2) from any claim that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief is due by reason of the terms of or effects arising from this Agreement. This indemnity and hold harmless agreement applies to all claims for damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of the events referred to in this Section or by reason of the terms of, or effects, arising from this Agreement. The Contractor further agrees to indemnify, hold harmless, and pay all costs for the defense ofthe City, including fees and costs for special counsel to be selected by the City, regarding any action by a third party challenging the validity of this Agreement, or asserting that personal injury, damages, just compensation, restitution, judicial or equitable relief due to personal or property rights arises by reason of the terms of, or effects arising from this Agreement. City may make all reasonable decisions with respect to its representation in any legal proceeding. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent Contractor' s services are subject to Civil Code Section 2782. 8, the above indemnity shall be limited, to the extent required by Civil Code Section 2782. 8, to claims that arise of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Contractor.
City Council 14 – 8 9/15/2026
9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNIFICATION
Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents, representatives, and employees against any and all liability, including costs, and attorney' s fees, for infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright contained in the work product or documents provided by Contractor to the City pursuant to this Agreement.
10. RECORDS
Contractor shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and any services, expenditures, and disbursements charged to the City for a minimum period of three ( 3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement. All such records and invoices shall be clearly identifiable.
Contractor shall allow a representative of the City to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement during regular business hours.
Contractor shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three ( 3) years from the date of final payment to Contractor under this Agreement.
11. CONFIDENTIALITY
If Contractor receives from the City information which due to the nature of such information is reasonably understood to be confidential and/ or proprietary, Contractor agrees that it shall not use or disclose such information except in the performance ofthis Agreement, and further agrees to exercise the same degree of care it uses to protect its own information of like importance, but in no event less than reasonable care. " Confidential Information" shall include all nonpublic information. Confidential information includes not only written information, but also information transferred orally, visually, electronically, or by other means. Confidential information disclosed to either party by any subsidiary and/ or agent of the other party is covered by this Agreement. The foregoing obligations of non- use and nondisclosure shall not apply to any information that ( a) has been disclosed in publicly available sources; b) is, through no fault of the Contractor disclosed in a publicly available source; ( c) is in rightful possession of the Contractor without an obligation of confidentiality; ( d) is required to be disclosed by operation of law; or ( e) is independently developed by the Contractor without reference to information disclosed by the City.
12. CONFLICT OF INTEREST CLAUSE
Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not have interests, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with performance of services specified under this Agreement.
13. NOTICE
Any notice, tender, demand, delivery, or other communication pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be properly given if delivered in person or mailed by first class or certified mail, postage prepaid, or sent by fax or other telegraphic communication in the manner provided City Council 14 – 9 9/15/2026
in this Section, to the following persons:
To City: Clerk ofthe City Council
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza ( M-30)
P. O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702- 1988
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza ( M- 21)
P. O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, CA 92702
To Contractor: AAA Oil, Inc.
11621 Westminster Avenue
Garden Grove CA 92843
Attn: Jennifer Crawley
Marketing Manager and Contracts Administrator
A party may change its address by giving notice in writing to the other party. Thereafter, any communication shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address. If sent by mail, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given three ( 3) days after it has been deposited in the United States mail, duly registered or certified, with postage prepaid, and addressed as set forth above. If sent by fax, communication shall be effective or deemed to have been given twenty- four ( 24) hours after the time set forth on the transmission report issued by the transmitting facsimile machine, addressed as set forth above. For purposes of calculating these timeframes, weekends, federal, state, County or City holidays shall be excluded.
14. EXCLUSIVITY AND AMENDMENT
This Agreement represents the complete and exclusive statement between the City and Contractor regarding the subject matter herein, and supersedes any and all other agreements, oral or written, between the parties. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Agreement and any attachments hereto, the terms ofthis Agreement shall prevail. This Agreement may not be modified except by written instrument signed by the City and by an authorized representative of Contractor. The parties agree that any terms or conditions of any purchase order or other instrument that are inconsistent with, or in addition to, the terms and conditions hereof, shall not bind or obligate Contractor or the City. Each party to this Agreement acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements, orally or otherwise, have been made by any party, or anyone acting on behalf of any party, which are not embodied herein.
City Council 14 – 10 9/15/2026
15. ASSIGNMENT
Inasmuch as this Agreement is intended to secure the specialized services of Contractor, Contractor may not assign, transfer, delegate, or subcontract any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City and any such assignment, transfer, delegation or subcontract without the City' s prior written consent shall be considered null and void. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to limit the City' s ability to have any of the services which are the subject to this Agreement performed by City personnel or by other Contractors retained by City.
16. WAIVER
No waiver of breach, failure of any condition, or any right or remedy contained in or granted by the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing and signed by the party waiving the breach, failure, right or remedy. No waiver of any breach, failure or right, or remedy shall be deemed a waiver of any other breach, failure, right or remedy, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing so specifies.
17. TERMINATION
This Agreement maybe terminated by the City upon thirty (30) days written notice oftermination.
In such event, Contractor shall be entitled to receive and the City shall pay Contractor compensation for all services performed by Contractor prior to receipt of such notice oftermination, subject to the following conditions:
a. As a condition of such payment, the Executive Director may require Contractor to deliver to the City all work product completed as of such date, and in such case such work product shall be the property of the City unless prohibited by law, and Contractor consents to the City' s use thereof for such purposes as the City deems appropriate. b. Payment need not be made for work which fails to meet the standard of performance specified in the Recitals ofthis Agreement.
18. NON-DISCRIMINATION
Contractor shall not discriminate because of race, color, creed, relation, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, age, national origin, ancestry, or disability, as defined and prohibited by applicable law, in the recruitment, selection, training, utilization, promotion, termination or other employment related activities or in connection with any activities under this Agreement. Contractor affirms that it is an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations.
19. JURISDICTION -VENUE
This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, interpretation, performance, and enforcement of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California. Both parties further agree that Orange County, California, shall be the venue for any action or proceeding that may be brought or arise out of, in connection with or by reason of this Agreement.
City Council 14 – 11 9/15/2026
20. PROFESSIONAL LICENSES
Contractor shall, throughout the term ofthis Agreement, maintain all necessary licenses, permits, approvals, waivers, and exemptions necessary for the provision of the services hereunder and required by the laws and regulations of the United States, the State of California, the City of Santa Ana and all other governmental agencies. Contractor shall notify the City immediately and in writing of its inability to obtain or maintain such permits, licenses, approvals, waivers, and exemptions. Said inability shall be cause for termination of this Agreement.
21. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
a. Each undersigned represents and warrants that its signature herein below has the power, authority and right to bind their respective parties to each of the terms ofthis Agreement, and shall indemnify City fully, including reasonable costs and attorney' s fees, for any injuries or damages to City in the event that such authority or power is not, in fact, held by the signatory or is withdrawn.
b. All exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto shall be incorporated as if fully set forth in the body of this Agreement.
Signatures on the following page]
City Council 14 – 12 9/15/2026
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the date and year first above written.
ATTEST:
Clerk of the Council
APPROVED AS TO FORM
SONIA R. CARVALHO
City Attorney
By:'
It
Jose Montoya
Assistant City Attorney
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
Nabil Saba, P. E.
Executive Director
Public Works Agency
CITY OF SANTA ANA
Kristine Ridge
City Manager
CONTRACTOR
c
Efrain avalos, Jr v
CEO aSecretary 10
City Council 14 – 13 9/15/2026
EXHIBIT A
City Council 14 – 14 9/15/2026
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
B. Agreement Statement
AAA Oil, Inc. dba California Fuels & Lubricants has thoroughly read the scope of work in this RFP, concurs with the service requirements and commits to performing the work in accordance with the terms and conditions of the standard agreement, if awarded. We have found no concerns that we feel need to be addressed.
C. Firm and Team Experience
Firm Overview
AAA Oil, Inc. dba California Fuels & Lubricants, a certified Minority Owned Business and Small Business Enterprise located in Garden Grove, Ca, is a leading distributor of quality petroleum products. Established in 2004, we provide fueling and lubricants services to approximately 450 clients.
We offer bulk delivery, on -site mobile fueling, inventory management, tank rentals and sales, fuel card programs, 2417 Emergency Fueling Services and a wide array of lubricants, fluids and accessories as well as internal fuel polishing capabilities. We are available 24/ 7, 365 days a year and can facilitate all aspects of the City of Santa Ana' s needs as outlined in your RFP.
No subcontractors would be used in the facilitation of this contract. All deliveries in Southern California are managed solely by our own fleet of trucks and our own personnel, offering you unmatched customer service and accountability. We also have storage of over 200,000 gallons of fuel in our yard to facilitate contracted fuel deliveries in the event of emergency or rack shutdowns.
We understand that fuel is a critical commodity that your operations rely upon and we are committed to meeting your needs promptly and with a staff of 90 professionals who have extensive experience in the petroleum industry. We pride ourselves on being reliable, flexible, service oriented and dedicated. Our sensational customer service is the cornerstone of our organization.
Executive Summary
Jaime Duenas. Owner and President —17 years of experience overseeing all Assets Management and Strategic Partnerships in relation to both equipment and supply Efrain Davalos, Owner. Secretary and CEO — 17 years of experience managing the Street Sales Team and Contracts Department
Christina Duenas. Owner and General Manage r- 17 years of experience overseeing all departments in day-to-day operations
Jennifer Crawley, Marketing Manager and Contracts Administrator — 23 years of experience in all aspects of fuel marketing, of which 8 years has been solely dedicated to executing bids and contract administration
City Council 14 – 15 9/15/2026
Jessica Ramos, Dispatch Manager - 16 years of experience managing the dispatch department and drivers
Mario Juarez, Director of Finance — 25 years of experience managing all aspects of Billing, Credit and Accounts Receivables
Juan Lopez, Procurement Manager — 15 years of experience managing, negotiating, allocating and contracting supply
Robert Diero, Fleet Manager — 23 years of experience managing truck fleet maintenance, licensing, permitting, safety and compliance
Oscar Gonzalez, Safety Coordinator and Service Manager — 8 years of experience managing the driver safety training program and coordinates all equipment rentals and service requests Team and Organization Structure
If awarded, the following key personnel would be involved in the City of Santa Ana' s contract as follows:
PROJECT MANAGER:
Jennifer Crawley - Marketing Manager and Contracts Administrator Handles Order Placement — M- F 8:00- 5:OOpm via phone or email OFFICE PH: 714-530-4795
CELL: 714- 376- 7813
icrawley,@oafueling, com
Jennifer reports to Efrain Davalos
Order Placement — After-hours, weekends and holidays:
2417 Manned Dispatch Department
PH: 714- 530- 4795
Dispatch Manager —Jessica Ramos
BACK-UP TO PROJECT MANAGER
Stephanie Reyes —Sales Coordinator
OFFICE PH: 714- 530-4795
CELL: 909- 965-0600
sreyesOcafueling. com
Efrain Davalos — Sales Manager
OFFICE PH: 714- 630- 4795
CELL: 714- 720- 1378
edavalos(a_cafueling. com
Invoicing:
Jennifer Crawley prices and approves all invoices for email distribution BillinglAccounts Payable personnel include:
Marcela Cabrerra, John Gutierrez, Fable Cabrerra, who all report to Maline Sip, who reports to Mario Juarez
City Council 14 – 16 9/15/2026
Accounts Receivables/ Collections:
Marisol Jimenez, who reports to Maline Sip, who reports to Mario Juarez Dispatch / Delivery:
Jessica Ramos is the Dispatch Manager, with 6 Dispatchers rotating 24/ 7 shifts. All deliveries would be managed by our proprietary fleet of 85 trucks (a combination of truck and trailer, semi and bobtail trucks) and 40 company employed drivers.
D. Understanding Scope of Services
AAA Oil, Inc. understands the scope of services to be provided. Upon receipt of order placement via phone or email, standard deliveries will be scheduled to be received by the City within 2 business days M- F 7: OOam- 5:OOpm with trucks equipped with radio and mobile telephone access that meet all CA compliance licensing and CARB regulation requirements and will adhere to all delivery requirements outlined in the scope of work.
In the event of emergency, our Dispatch can be reached 24/ 7 by calling 714- 530- 4795. The Project Manager and Back- up Personnel contact information has also been provided if needed.
In the event that the City' s primary fuel tanks go out of service, AAA Oil, Inc. offers wet -hose services for both gasoline and diesel fuel, temporary tanks rentals, fuel trailer loans either with or without an attendant and a fuel card program.
AAA Oil, Inc. is also capable of managing the City's fuel inventory by installing remote fuel monitors that the City can also have access to via email. This would ensure that there are always eyes on your inventory and orders can either be placed by our staff on an as -needed basis or by the City' s personnel. The monitors provide alerts every 4 hours, allowing neither AAA Oil nor the City to be ever be caught off -guard. Should the City want to proceed with this value- added service, the cost would be an additional 0.02 per gallon on the fuel deliveries for those tanks we install monitors on.
E. Relevant Service Experience
Because CFL owns and operates its proprietary fleet, we offer customized solutions to your organization and pride ourselves on being creative and responsive in addressing the needs of our customers.
We service a variety of customers including commercial and industrial end -users, marinas, truck stops, municipalities, state and local government, utilities, military installations and both unbranded and branded retail stations. In addition, we provide inventory -managed delivery services to major refiners, delivering fuel to branded stations including Arco, Shell and USA gasoline.
Please see a list a references included in your Attachment 3: Proposers References to follow City Council 14 – 17 9/15/2026
EXHIBIT B
City Council 14 – 18 9/15/2026
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ( RFP)
GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL SUPPLY AND DELIVERY SERVICES
RFP NO.: 22- 110
CITY OF SANTA ANA
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY
220 S. Daisy Avenue, Bldg A
Santa Ana, CA 92703
Armando Fernandez, P. E.
Project Manager
714) 647- 3316 Office
afernandez@santa- ana. org
Approved for Release:
Nabil Saba, PE
Executive Director
ublic Works Agency
KEY RFP DATES (Subject to change at discretion of City):
Issue Date: Tuesday, September 13, 2022
Deadline for Requests for Information: Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 4: 00 P. M.
Proposal Due Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 4: 00 P. M.
Projected Award Date ( anticipated): Tuesday, November 15, 2022 City Council 14 – 19 9/15/2026
CITY OF SANTA ANA
RFP NO.: 22- 110
GASOLINE AND DIESEL FUEL SUPPLY AND DELIVERY SERVICES
Appendix
ATTACHMENT 1: SCOPE OF WORK
City of Santa Ana RFP 22- 110
Y
Gasoline and Diesel Fuel SupPly and Delivery Services