Agenda packet — City Council and Authorities Concurrent, August 30, 2022 (part 7 of 11)

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-923 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Note and File Informational Report to Council on Modifications to the Police Department’s Unmanned Aircraft System Program Policy

BACKGROUND
Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS or drones) are portable systems flown remotely without a pilot onboard and are controlled from an operator(s) on the ground. UAS have shown to be a valuable resource to police and fire organizations by providing an aerial view of a crime and/or disaster scene that may not otherwise be seen, locate survivors or send information about their whereabouts to responders on the ground, expedite incident solutions and provide safety to all parties involved in the incident. This technology, commonly referred to as a "drone," has been successfully utilized by various police and fire organizations to enhance emergency services in their respective communities.

UAS programs have been successfully implemented throughout the nation. Locally, the cities of Campbell, San José and Sunnyvale have UAS programs.

The Police Department brought forward Policy #606, Unmanned Aerial Systems Operations, to the City Council on October 8, 2019 as an Informational Report. The Policy was consistent with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) guidelines and industry best practices conducted by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), and the California Police Chiefs Association (CPCA) and takes into consideration public interest groups and constituents’ concerns regarding the use of this technology.

Policy #606, reviewed by the Chief’s Advisory Committee (CAC) in April 2019, addressed CAC concerns and recommendations. It authorizes use by a UAS Pilot in accordance with policy, constitutional rights, and FAA regulations for:
· Disaster response and damage assessment (e.g. earthquake, flood) · Locating missing persons and rescue events
· Identifying, locating and apprehending non-compliant, threatening or combative persons who pose a threat of injury or death to themselves, others or officers · Suspected explosive devices
· Dangers that would benefit from situational intelligence exposed from an aerial perspective · Video / photographic documentation of crime scenes or collision locations · Training flights as required to meet FAA and department certification standards · Conduct inspections of the City’s utility infrastructure (e.g. electric, fiber, water, sewer, etc.) to detect leaks or stressed assets
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 1 of 4
powered by Legistar™
22-923 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
The policy incorporates reasonable constraints to the operational use of this technology. The policy strictly forbids certain activities that were found to be of concern in other jurisdictions, such as:
· To target a person(s) based solely on individual characteristics, such as, but not limited to, race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation · To harass, intimidate or discriminate against any individual or group · To conduct personal business of any type
· To conduct random surveillance activities
The Police Department initially planned to launch the City’s inaugural UAS program in Fall 2019.

Implementation was delayed to early 2020 when the Police Department acquired a UAS from Impossible Aerospace, a Santa Clara based company. Unfortunately, Impossible Aerospace closed shortly after the global pandemic hit the U.S. Before doing so, their representative reached out to the Police Department to inform us of the pending action and offered to allow the Police Department to return the product for a full refund. Due to product warranty, support and maintenance concerns, the Police Department returned the equipment.

The pandemic supply chain issues combined with the City’s reduced staffing levels forced the Police Department to focus on essential functions.

DISCUSSION
The Police Department has developed a new timeline for launching its UAS program in Fall 2022.

Between now and Fall, the timeline includes:
· May
o Recruitment and selection of UAS operators
· July
o Acquisition of UAS systems and accessories
· August
o Seek FAA approvals (e.g. Part 107, Certificate of Authorization, etc.) o Conduct UAS operator training
o Share Information Report with City Council on the status of the program and adjustment (s) to Policy #606
o Update Police Department procedures to incorporate this technology o Acquisition of UAS software
· September
o Integrate UAS with existing Police Department technology · October
o Launch pilot UAS program
Concurrently, the Police Department is updating Policy #606 to reflect FAA operating rule changes effective April 21, 2021.These updates impact integrating drones into National Airspace System and allow for increased operational flexibility as the industry and demand continue to grow. The new rules include:
· The new Remote ID Rule from the FAA states that all UAS will be required to broadcast City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 2 of 4
powered by Legistar™
22-923 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
identification and location information that can be received by a third party such as law enforcement. This rule is scheduled to go into effect on September 16, 2023, with all manufacturers in compliance by September 16, 2022.

The purpose of this rule is to allow the FAA, law enforcement and other federal agencies to identify an aircraft operating unsafely or where they shouldn’t be. According to the FAA, this rule also lays the groundwork for more advanced operations in the future like drones deliveries, which does not apply to the Police Department’s intended uses, but nonetheless impacts our policy language.
· In the past, flying a drone at night (commercially) required the FAA’s 107.29 Waiver and quite a bit of risk mitigation, in turn making night flying quite costly. With this rule change, remote pilots can legally fly at night without said waiver and additional risk mitigation expanding the services UAV pilots can offer to their customers.

In order to take advantage of this new rule, however, pilots must receive appropriate training, successfully pass the FAA’s Part 107 Recurrent Exam, and the aircraft must be equipped with approved aviation anti-collision lighting visible for at least three statute miles. · Flying drones over people in the past required a 107.39 Waiver from the FAA, but now a remote pilot can conduct drone operations over people as long as they’re compliant with the specific requirements of the rule. The FAA guidelines are very specific guidelines as to what classifies “flights over people.”
· Additionally, a UAS may not maintain sustained flight over moving vehicles.

Per Policy #606, the Chief of Police grants written authorization to the UAS Coordinator and Operators, with input from the Watch Commander as necessary, for the deployment of this technology in accordance with policy, constitutional rights, and FAA regulations.

On July 25, 2022, the Police Department presented the proposed amendments to Policy #606 to the Chief’s Advisory Committee (CAC). The CAC felt FAA regulation changes were inevitable and acknowledged Policy #606 would need to alter accordingly. While the CAC appreciated the update from staff, they didn’t feel it was necessary to return to CAC with FAA adjustments moving forward.

The CAC did reinforce they would like to be consulted if the Department anticipated a substantial change to the intended use of the equipment.

Following the launch of this pilot UAS program, the Police Department will continue to make adjustments to Policy #606 internally, as necessary, as the FAA implements new or amended regulations. Future modifications will be vetted through the Chief’s Advisory Committee and will not involve City Council for each modification unless there is a significant or noteworthy change.

Meanwhile, the Chief of Police will continue to monitor the use of this technology for their respective operations. The cost effectiveness and availability of this technology assists in the circumstances where aerial assets such as airplanes or helicopters are not readily available or are cost prohibitive.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 3 of 4
powered by Legistar™
22-923 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(b)(5) in that it is a governmental organizational or administrative activity that will not result in direct or indirect changes in the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the Finance Department and City Attorney’s Office.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or at the
public information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.

RECOMMENDATION
Note and file informational report to Council on adjustments to Santa Clara Police Department Policy #606, Unmanned Aircraft System Operations.

Reviewed by: Pat Nikolai, Chief of Police
Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Red Line Version of Policy #606
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 4 of 4
powered by Legistar™
Policy
606
Santa Clara Police Department
SCPD Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/06/09, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Santa Clara Police Department Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations -
524
Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations
606.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the use of an unmanned aerial system (UAS) and for the storage, retrieval and dissemination of images and data captured by the UAS. 606.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include:

Unmanned Aerial
System (UAS) - An unmanned aircraft of any type that is capable of sustaining directed flight, whether preprogrammed or remotely controlled (commonly referred to as an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)), and all of the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording or any other means. 606.2 POLICY
Unmanned aerial systems may be utilized to enhance the department’s mission of protecting lives and property when other means and resources are not available or are less effective. Any use of a UAS will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) regulations.
606.3 PRIVACY
The use of the UAS potentially involves privacy considerations. Absent a warrant or exigent circumstances, operators and observers shall adhere to FAA altitude regulations and shall not intentionally record or transmit images of any location where a person would have a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g., residence, yard, enclosure). Operators and observers shall take reasonable precautions to avoid inadvertently recording or transmitting images of areas where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. Reasonable precautions can include, for example, deactivating or turning imaging devices away from such areas or persons during UAS operations. 606.4 PROGRAM COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police will appoint a program coordinator who will be responsible for the management of the UAS program
. The program coordinator will ensure that policies and procedures conform to current laws, regulations and best practices and will have the following additional responsibilities:
• Coordinating the FAA Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) application process and ensuring that the COA is current.
• Ensuring that all authorized operators and required observers have completed all required FAA and department-approved training in the operation, applicable laws, policies and procedures regarding use of the UAS.
• Developing uniform protocol for submission and evaluation of requests to deploy a UAS, including urgent requests made during ongoing or emerging incidents.

The Chief of Police grants deployment authorization to the program coordinator and licensed operators, with input from the Watch Commander as necessary. of a UAS shall require written authorization of the Chief of Police or the authorized designee, depending on the type of mission.

Santa Clara Police Department
SCPD Policy Manual
Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/06/09, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Santa Clara Police Department Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations -
525
• Developing protocol for conducting criminal investigations involving a UAS, including documentation of time spent monitoring a subject.
• Implementing a system for public notification of UAS deployment. • Developing an operational protocol governing the deployment and operation of a UAS including, but not limited to, safety oversight, use of visual observers, establishment of lost link procedures and secure communication with air traffic control facilities. • Developing a protocol for fully documenting all missions. • Developing a UAS inspection, maintenance and record-keeping protocol to ensure continuing airworthiness of a UAS, up to and including its overhaul or life limits. • Developing protocols to ensure that all data intended to be used as evidence are accessed, maintained, stored and retrieved in a manner that ensures its integrity as evidence, including strict adherence to chain of custody requirements. Electronic trails, including encryption, authenticity certificates and date and time stamping, shall be used as appropriate to preserve individual rights and to ensure the authenticity and maintenance of a secure evidentiary chain of custody.
• Developing protocols that ensure retention and purge periods are maintained in accordance with established records retention schedules. • Facilitating law enforcement access to images and data captured by the UAS. • Recommending program enhancements, particularly regarding safety and information security.
• Ensuring that established protocols are followed by monitoring and providing periodic reports on the program to the Chief of Police.
606.5 USE OF UAS
Only authorized operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate the UAS.

Use of vision enhancement technology (e.g., thermal and other imaging equipment not generally available to the public) is permissible in viewing areas only where there is no protectable privacy interest or when in compliance with a search warrant or court order. In all other instances, legal counsel should be consulted.

UAS operations should only be conducted during daylight hours and a UAS should not be flown over populated areas without FAA approval.

The UAS is authorized to be deployed according to FAA guidelines under certain circumstances, including, but not limited to:
• Public safety and life preservation missions including; barricaded suspects, hostage situations, active shooters, apprehension of armed and dangerous fleeing suspects, and high-risk search warrants;
• Lost or missing persons;
• Rescue events;
Santa Clara Police Department
SCPD Policy Manual
Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/06/09, All Rights Reserved.

Published with permission by Santa Clara Police Department Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Operations -
526
• Disaster response and recovery;
• Suspected explosive devices;
• Fire/arson investigation;
• Post-incident crime scene/accident scene preservation and documentation; • Pursuant to a search warrant;
• Departmental videos (Recruitment, P.R., etc)
• Anytime a UAS would enhance public safety, improve operational safety, incident stabilization or incident mitigation as determined by the authorizing person; • Anti-UAV operations when a person is operating a UAV in a manner which impedes emergency personnel who, in the course of their duties, are coping with an emergency (refer to Penal Code 402(a)(1); and
• In support of other law enforcement agencies or fire departments when the underlying mission meets the uses outlined in this policy.
606.6 PROHIBITED USE
The UAS video surveillance equipment shall not be used:
• To conduct random surveillance activities.
• To target a person based solely on actual or perceived characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, economic status, age, cultural group, or disability. • To harass, intimidate, or discriminate against any individual or group. • To conduct personal business of any type.

The UAS shall not be weaponized.
606.7 RETENTION OF UAS DATA
Data collected by the UAS shall be retained as provided in the established records retention schedule.

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-2029 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action on the Introduction of an Ordinance Repealing Chapter 2.105 (Finance Department) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) and Adding a New Chapter 2.105 (Finance Department) of Title 2 (“Administration and Personnel”) of “The Code of the City of Santa Clara, California” to Implement New Purchasing Requirements and Update Administrative Language

COUNCIL PILLAR
Deliver and Enhance High Quality and Efficient Services and Infrastructure

BACKGROUND
At the January 2019 Council Priority Setting Session, the Purchasing Manager recommended improvements to the City’s purchasing program that were accepted by the City Council. Since then, numerous improvements with the proper internal controls have been implemented that have resulted in improved acquisition processes for general services and equipment, and improved competition and transparency in the vendor selection process. Some of the strategic objectives recommended in 2019 that have not been implemented include updating the purchasing code to reflect the new purchasing program and updating bid and delegation of contract authority thresholds to reflect current practices as benchmarked against both federal and local agencies purchasing practices.

At the June 7, 2021 meeting of the Governance and Ethics Committee, the purchasing reforms were presented, and the Committee approved moving forward with the changes to the full Council.

At the August 18, 2021 City Council meeting, Council approved moving forward with a revised purchasing code.

DISCUSSION
The City purchasing code, last updated in 2015, contains the procurement procedures for the purchase of goods and services by the City.

With this purchasing code update, significant changes to the city code include:
· Increasing bid thresholds to $250,000 for materials, general services, and professional services.
· Increasing the City Manager’s signature authority to $250,000 for purchases across all departments.
· Introduces a procurement guide to serve as a reference for the practical application of purchasing code provisions.
· Incorporates consistent bidding and contracting practices between products and services. · Eliminates the 1% local business preference.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 1 of 3
powered by Legistar™
22-2029 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
· Addresses ambiguity and cleans up various code sections for clarity. For example, the revised Code separates signature authority thresholds and solicitation methods into distinct sections to avoid confusion.

Many of these changes were brought forward to align with local jurisdictions, federal best practices for procurement, provide clarity around processes and definitions, and realize capacity efficiencies and cost effectiveness for processing agreements. Additional impacts from the procurement changes would result in fewer number of Council requests for staff to prepare, faster procurement cycles to obtain goods and services and reducing staff time to administer the new Purchasing Code.

Contracts for public works or for the purchase or sale of water, electrical power, fuels for the generation of electrical power, wastewater and recycled water will continue to be excepted from the requirements of the purchasing code.

The City Manager’s Office, City Attorney’s Office, and the Finance Department have worked closely to update the City’s Purchasing Code. These recommendations will improve efficiencies by streamlining several business processes without sacrificing internal controls that have been implemented over the past several years.

Several administrative changes are also included to Chapter 2.105 of the Ordinance. These changes update the organizational structure of the Finance Department and removes outdated language.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action being considered does not constitute a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA” pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15378(a) as it has no potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this ordinance update. This update is expected to streamline business processes and improve efficiency.

COORDINATION
This report has been coordinated with the City Attorney’s and City Manager’s offices, and the Finance Department.

RECOMMENDATION
Introduce an Ordinance Repealing Chapter 2.105 (Finance Department) of Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) and Adding a New Chapter 2.105 (Finance Department) of Title 2 (“Administration and City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 2 of 3
powered by Legistar™
22-2029 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
Personnel”) of “The Code of the City of Santa Clara, California” to Implement New Purchasing Requirements and Update Administrative Language.

Reviewed by: Kenn Lee, Director of Finance
Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed Ordinance repealing Chapter 2.105 (Finance Department) and adding a new Chapter

2.105 (Finance Department)

2. Purchasing Code Update-Redline
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 3 of 3
powered by Legistar™
Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 1 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA,
REPLEALING CHAPTER 2.105 (FINANCE DEPARTMENT ) OF
TITLE 2 (ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL) AND ADDING A
NEW CHAPTER 2.105 (FINANCE DEPARTMENT) OF TITLE 2
(“ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL”) OF “THE CODE OF THE

CITY OF SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA TO IMPLEMENT NEW

PURCHASING REQUIREMENTS AND UPDATE ADMINISTRATIVE

LANGUAGE

BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA AS FOLLOWS:

WHEREAS, the City seeks to amend Santa Clara City Code Chapter 2.105 to update its purchasing system for supplies, materials, equipment and services and the disposal of surplus property to align it with Federal and state purchasing “best practices”; clarify certain Code sections for City Staff and the public; and update certain outdated administrative language; WHEREAS, The City currently has certain provisions of “The Code of the City of San ta Clara, California” (“SCCC”) devoted to purchasing at Chapter 2.105; and, WHEREAS, the City desires to repeal SCCC Chapter 2.105 in its entirely and add a new SCCC Chapter 2.105.

NOW THEREFORE , BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SANTA C LARA AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1: That the current Chapter 2.1 05 SCCC (“Finance De partment”) be repealed in its entirety.

SECTION 2: That a new Chapter 2.105 (“Finance Department”) is added to Title 2 (“Administration and Personnel”) of “The Code of the City of Santa Clara, California” (“SCCC”) to read as follows:
“Chapter 2.105

FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Sections:

2.105.010 Definitions.

2.105.020 Organization generally – Director of Finance.

2.105.030 Accounting services division.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 2 of 18
Rev: 09/2019

2.105.040 Municipal services division.

2.105.050 Budget division.

2.105.060 Financial management and treasury division.

2.105.070 Purchasing – Authority – Application.

2.105.080 Adoption of centralized purchasing system for Products and General Services.

2.105.090 Centralized purchasing – Exceptions.

2.105.100 Splitting of purchases or contracts for Products or General Services.

2.105.110 Appropriation balance necessary.

2.105.120 Purchasing Division Manager.

2.105.130 Additional quantities.

2.105.140 Competitive requirements for purchases.

2.105.150 Formal competitive bids or proposals; use of electronic media; reverse auctions.

2.105.160 Award of contracts.

2.105.170 Notice inviting bids.

2.105.180 Bidders’ security.

2.105.190 Performance and payment bonds.

2.105.200 Rejection of bids or proposals.

2.105.210 Tie bids.

2.105.220 Procedure when no bids or proposals received.

2.105.230 Bid or Proposal irregularities or informalities.

2.105.240 Protest Procedures.

2.105.250 Procurements where competitive methods are not practicable.

2.105.260 Emergency purchases.

2.105.270 Purchases from other public agencies or through the utilization of Competitive bid processes of other public agencies.

2.105.280 Single and sole source procurements.

2.105.290 Idle act.

2.105.300 Purchase orders and contracts– Signature authority.

2.105.310 Surplus personal property.

2.105.320 Climate friendly purchasing.

2.105.010 Definitions.

As used in this chapter:
(a) “Brand name” means a specification limited to one or more items by manufacturers’ names or catalog numbers to describe the standard of quality, performance, and other salient characteristics needed to meet City requirements, and which provides for the submission of equivalent products.
(b) “Business” means any corporation, partnership, individual, sole proprietorship, joint stock company, joint venture or any other private legal entity. (c) “City” means the City of Santa Clara and any of its affiliated agencies. (d) “City Manager” means the City Manager or his/her designee.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 3 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(e) “General Services” means any work performed or services rendered by an independent contractor, with or without the furnishing of materials.

(1) “General Services” includes, but is not limited to the following:

(A) Maintenance, nonstructural repair, and improvements to City buildings and structures, which do not require engineering plans, specifications or design, such as replacement of broken window panes, fire extinguisher maintenance, minor roof repairs, utility systems maintenance, elevator maintenance, custodial services and pest control;
(B) Repair, modification and maintenance of City equipment and software; (C) Cleaning, analysis, testing, moving, removal and disposal (otherwise than by sale) of City materials, supplies and equipment;
(D) Replanting, care, and maintenance of public grounds, including, but not limited to, trees, shrubbery, flowers and lawns, which does not require engineering plans, specifications or design;
(E) Professional and non-professional services to facilitate City operations; and (F) Repair, demolition and other work, required to abate nuisances pursuant to this Code.
(2) “General Services” shall not include:
(A) Work performed by City employees, public agencies, or pursuant to City collective bargaining agreements;
(B) Public works projects as defined in this Chapter;
(C) Any purchase of materials, supplies or equipment;
(C) Services performed under a grant agreement between the City and a grantee of a City program;
(D) Services for the design, fabrication or installation of a work of art; (E) Temporary staffing services; or
(F) Services performed under a concession agreement between the City and a licensee or permittee on City property.
(f) “Life-cycle costs” means the costs that the City reasonably should be expected to pay for the full life of a product, including the purchase amount, ancillary costs, and recycling and disposal costs at end-of-life.
(g) “Maintenance” means routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation, protection, and keeping of any publicly owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes in a safe and continually usable condition for which it was designed, improved, constructed, altered, or repaired. This definition of “maintenance” expressly includes, but is not limited to carpentry, Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 4 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
electrical, plumbing, glazing, and other craftwork that is consistent with the definition set forth above to preserve the facility in a safe, efficient, and continually usable condition for which it was intended, including repairs, cleaning, and other operations on machinery and other equipment permanently attached to the building or realty as fixtures. This definition does not include, among other types of work, janitorial or custodial services and protection of the sort provided by guards or other security forces. Upgrades to facilities may be considered maintenance only if they are necessary to preserve, protect and keep the public facility operating for its intended purpose in a safe and continually usable condition for which it was designed, improved, constructed, altered, or repaired.
(h) “Person” means any business, individual, union, committee, club, organization or group of individuals.
(i) “Products” means supplies, materials, equipment, and software that are required for City operations.
(j) “Procurement” means the, sourcing, purchasing, renting, leasing or otherwise acquiring of any General Services or Products. “Procurement” also includes any function that pertains to obtaining Products or General Services, such as description of requirements, selection and solicitation of sources, preparation and awards of contracts, and contractual administration. (k) “Procurement card” means a charge card issued to an employee of the City of Santa Clara for the purpose of making authorized purchases on the City’s behalf. (l) “Procurement Guide” is a user guide, promulgated by the Purchasing Division Manager, that addresses the practical application of the provisions of this Chapter. (m) “Public works” means the erection, construction, alteration, repair or improvement of any public structure, building, road or other public improvement of any kind. (n) “Responsible bidder” means a vendor or contractor with the capability in all respects to perform all contractual responsibilities, that presents a bid amount that is competitive and reasonable, and has attributes of trustworthiness, quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to satisfactorily perform under the contract.
(o) “Reverse auction" means an internet-based process in which vendors compete to o btain business, the identity of v endors submitting bids but not the amo unt of the bids remains sealed during the time allotted for the auction, and vendors may submit succes sively lower bids, with the goal that bids submitted by vendors will decrease over the time allotted for the auction.
(p) “Sole Source” means that there is only one supplier or contractor available for the required product or service.
(q) “Single Source” means that a particular supplier is purposefully chosen by the buying organization even when there are other suppliers with a functional equivalent of the product available.
(r) “Specification” means any description of the physical or functional characteristics or of the nature of a supply, service or construction item. It may include a description of any requirement for inspecting, testing, preparing a supply or service for delivery, or product to be used.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 5 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(s) “Surplus supplies” means personal property owned by the City that no longer has a useful purpose. Surplus supplies includes, but is not limited to, supplies that are worn out, obsolete or unsuitable for City use.
(t) “Total taxable amount” means total price for products or services exclusive of shipping, handling, and any other associated charges.

2.105.020 Organization generally – Director of Finance. (a) The Finance Department shall be under the direct supervision of a Director of Finance, who shall be in the unclassified service. The Finance Department shall be organized into the divisions as provided in this chapter. The Director of Finance shall manage and direct the activities of the Finance Department.
(b) The Assistant Director of Finance, who shall be in the unclassified service, shall assist the Director of Finance and shall act in the capacity of Director of Finance in his/her absence.

Additionally, the Assistant Director of Finance may be assigned the responsibility to oversee the operation of one or more of the divisions or may be assigned to directly supervise one of the divisions.

2.105.030 Accounting services division.

The accounting services division shall be under the immediate supervision of the Assistant Director of Finance or a division manager, accounting services, who shall be in the unclassified service. The duties of this division shall be as follows:
(a) Manage the general accounting system and accounting control for all the various offices, departments, and agencies of the City.
(b) Prepare and submit for the City Council a monthly statement of all receipts and disbursements in sufficient detail to show the City’s current financial position. (c) Maintain cemetery and miscellaneous accounts receivable and deposit ledgers. (d) Maintain an accounts payable ledger and manage the proper disbursement of all moneys in accordance with the City budget.
(e) Develop and implement expenditure control procedures over each office, department, or agency of the City.
(f) Prepare and record the biweekly payroll, voucher all claims against the City, and prepare the necessary warrants and checks for payment therefor.
(g) Maintain records correctly showing all the capital assets and liabilities of the City. (h) Prepare annual audited financial statements for the City and its agencies and other periodic financial statements and reports as required and requested. (i) Prepare for publication all required governmental reports having to do with the financial condition of the City.
(j) Compile data and statistics and develop financial analysis as required and requested. (k) Manage special projects as assigned.
(l) Manage production of the City’s annual financial reports, general-purpose financial statements, and annual comprehensive financial report.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 6 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(m) Manage the following ongoing projects:
(1) Reimbursement claims against the state;
(2) Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) updates; (3) Legislative review and updates;
(4) Internal audit of fixed assets for insurance reporting. (n) Perform internal control of Finance Department functions.

2.105.040 Municipal services division.

The municipal services division shall be under the immediate supervision of the Assistant Director of Finance or a division manager, municipal services, who shall be in the unclassified service. The duties and responsibilities of this division shall be as follows:
(a) Manage field and office customer service staff who provide counter and telephone assistance regarding utilities, business tax, process and receipt all monetary transactions (e.g., request for turn-on and turn-off of utilities, meter testing, payment arrangements and referrals for financial assistance).
(b) Manage a complex on-line computerized utility billing system which tracks meter and payment history, consumption, charges, allocations and generates monthly billings. (c) Research, prepare findings, and resolve customer concerns, suggestions and/or complaints. (d) Maintain a comprehensive computerized hand-held meter reading system which stores monthly meter reads and interfaces with the utility billing system to generate monthly utility billings.
(e) Receive and have custody of all cash and checks received over the counter or in the mail by the City from any source and issue receipts therefor.
(f) Administer a computerized cash receipting system which tracks all payments received by the City. This system provides for real time verification of payments, encoding and endorsing of all checks and automatic posting of all transactions to the utility billing and business tax systems. (g) Deposit or keep safe all moneys received in such depositories as may be designated by the City Council, in compliance with the provisions of the State law governing the handling, depositing, and securing of public funds.
(h) Administer the business tax policies and related enforcement, as directed, including the billing therefor.
(i) Maintain and process all bankruptcy claims; and prepare and file various State and Federal reports.
(j) Coordinate and process numerous service contracts and equipment maintenance contracts. (k) Act as City’s representative for the receipt and evaluation of solicitation requests from charitable organizations.
(l) Manage special projects as assigned.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 7 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(m) Perform such other related administrative duties as may be assigned by the Director of Finance.
(n) Receive credit and debit card transactions.
(o) Adoption and Amendment of Municipal Services Division, Utility Services Rules and Regulations.
(1) Adoption of Rules and Regulations by Resolution. The City Council may, from time to time, by resolution, as it deems necessary for the administration or implementation of the intent of this Code, review, revise, adopt and/or promulgate new or amended rules and regulations concerning the operation or administration of the following:
(A) Finance Department’s Municipal Services Division, Utility Services Rules and Regulations [SCCC 2.105.040];
(B) Electric Department’s Silicon Valley Power Rules and Regulations [SCCC

13.05.040];
(C) Water Department’s Rules and Regulations for Water Service and Use [SCCC

13.15.080]; and
(D) Street Department’s Rules and Regulations for Garbage, Refuse, Recycling, Household Hazardous Waste, and/or Clean Green Service [SCCC 8.25.290]. (2) Amendment of Municipal Services Division, Utility Services Rules and Regulations. The City Council may subsequently adopt or amend the Municipal Services Division, Utility Services Rules and Regulations from time to time by resolution of the City Council. Such amendments may be adopted as the City Council deems necessary or expedient for the administration or implementation of this Code, or to review, revise, adopt and/or promulgate new or amended rules and regulations concerning the operation or administration of the electric, water, sewer and/or street departments to govern the municipal and utility services furnished by the City. Such amendments may be in response to changing facts and circumstances which affect the operation of the City’s electric, water, sewer and/or street departments, or as a result of any applicable law(s) and/or regulation(s) implemented by the Federal or State government, their respective regulatory agency(ies), or local ordinance. Any new or amended rules and regulations subsequently adopted by the City Council by resolution shall be incorporated by reference into this Code. (3) Responsible Parties. Customers of the electric, water, and/or street departments shall be considered as having given express consent to be bound by this Code and any City departmental Rules and Regulations subsequently enacted pursuant to this Code. (4) Responsibility for Enforcement. The primary responsibility for enforcement of the departmental rules and regulations shall be with the City Manager. (p) Enforcement of the Rules and Regulations. Except when more specific provisions pertaining to departmental rules and regulations are intended to supersede the provisions of SCCC

1.05.070, the following shall apply:
(1) Pursuant to SCCC 1.05.070, the City, in its prosecutorial discretion, may enforce violation(s) of the departmental rules and regulation as a criminal, civil, and/or administrative action.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 8 of 18
Rev: 09/2019

2.105.050 Budget division.

The budget division shall be under the immediate supervision of the Assistant Director of Finance or a division manager, who shall be in the unclassified service. The duties and responsibilities of this division shall be as follows:

(a) Compile and produce the City’s biennial operating and capital improvement budgets. (b) Produce annual updates to the City’s ten-year financial study. (c) Prepare and monitor long-range financial plans for the City and its agencies, including periodic updates as required.
(d) Prepare periodic and annual revenue forecasts.
(e) Analyze and prepare estimated revenue and expenditure updates. (f) Monitor and report the City’s Proposition 4 appropriations limit and general contingency reserves.
(g) Manage sales and property tax audits.
(h) Analyze and recommend options for budget balancing to the City Manager. (i) Monitor operating and capital improvement budgets, with regular reporting to the City Council. (j) Coordinate the forecasting of general liability, earthquake, property and casualty, and other miscellaneous insurance costs and coverages (commercial or self-insurance) with the City’s Risk Manager. (k) Manage special projects as assigned.

2.105.060 Financial management and treasury division.

The financial management and treasury division shall be under the immediate supervision of the Assistant Director of Finance or a division manager, financial management, who shall be in the unclassified service. The duties of this division shall be as follows:
(a) Monitor the financing needs of the City and its agencies and manage negotiated and public- bid bond issues.
(b) Manage cash flow and invest idle cash in accordance with established policies and procedures and prepare monthly reports for the City and its agencies. (c) Manage the outstanding debt of the City and its agencies in compliance with established policies and various bond covenants and prepare periodic reports. (d) Compile data and statistics and develop financial analysis and forecasts as required and requested.
(e) Administer contracts between the City and its agencies and outside contractors for compliance with financial and insurance terms and conditions of these agreements, consistent with City policy.
(f) Manage special projects as required.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 9 of 18
Rev: 09/2019

2.105.070 Purchasing – Authority – Application.
(a) This purchasing system shall apply to all purchases of Products and General Services, in whatever amount.
(b) The establishment of a centralized purchasing system is authorized and directed by “The Charter of the City of Santa Clara, California” Section 1318 and Government Code Sections 54201 through 54205.
(c) When a purchase involves the expenditure of Federal assistance and/or contract funds, the purchase shall be conducted in accordance with mandatory Federal law and regulations. (d) Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the City from complying with the terms and conditions of any grant, gift or bequest that is otherwise consistent with law.

2.105.080 Adoption of centralized purchasing system for Products and General Services. (a) A purchasing system is hereby adopted in order to: establish uniform procedures for the purchase of Products and General Services at the lowest possible cost while ensuring quality, quantity and availability; exercise proactive financial control over purchases; and clearly define authority for the purchasing function.
(b) There is also hereby created a centralized purchasing division, under the direct supervision of the City Manager or her/his designee, in whom is vested authority for the purchase of Products and General Services.
(c) The purchasing system may allow for the decentralization of certain purchasing functions as appropriate while ensuring appropriate internal controls. (d) The purchasing system shall require the Purchasing Division Manager to promulgate and maintain a Procurement Guide to serve as a user guide that addresses the practical application of the provisions of the Chapter.
(e) All purchases of Products and General Services shall require a City purchase order or signed agreement. Exceptions to this requirement include:
(1) Procurement card purchases made in accordance with the City procurement card policy; and
(2) Payments made for ongoing City operations as described in the City’s Procurement Guide.

2.105.090 Centralized purchasing – Exceptions.

The following are exceptions to the centralized purchasing system:
(a) The City Manager may authorize in writing any City department to purchase, contract for, or specify General Services or Products independently of the centralized purchasing system, but it shall be required that such purchases or contracts be made in conformity with this Chapter and the City’s Procurement Guide.
(b) Any contract for the purchase or sale of water, electrical power, fuels for the generation of electrical power, wastewater and recycled water.
(c) Any contract for a public work as defined by applicable State and local law, including, but not limited to, City Charter Section 1310 and Public Contracts Code Section 5100 et seq.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 10 of 18
Rev: 09/2019

2.105.100 Splitting of purchase orders or contracts for Products or General Services.

No officer or employee of the City shall split or separate a purchase of Products or a contract for General Services for the purpose of evading the provisions of this Chapter. The acquisition of Products should normally be made as a single purchase when the need has been identified for multiples of items, related items, or similar items, which are ordinarily available from the same vendor or manufacturer.

2.105.110 Appropriation balance necessary.
(a) Except for emergency purchases made pursuant to this Chapter, no officer or employee of the City shall requisition or order any Products or General Services unless there exists an unencumbered balance of an appropriation or appropriations available for such purchase, against which the requisition or purchase may be charged. (b) When funds are not appropriated or otherwise made available to support continuation of performance in a subsequent fiscal year, the purchase shall be cancelled and the contractor shall be reimbursed for the reasonable value of any nonrecurring costs incurred but not amortized in the price of the Products or General Services delivered under the contract.

2.105.120 Purchasing Division Manager.

The Purchasing Division Manager shall be in the unclassified service and shall be the head of and have general responsibility for the purchasing division. The Purchasing Division Manager shall, subject to the delegation and approval of the City Manager, have authority to or provide support thereof to:
(a) Purchase and contract for General Services and Products required by any City department in accordance with prescribed bidding procedures set forth in this Chapter; (b) Negotiate and recommend execution of contracts or purchase orders for the purchase of General Services and Products;
(c) Act to procure for the City the needed quality and quantity of General Services and Products at the least expense or best value to the City;
(d) Endeavor to obtain as full and open competition as possible; (e) Prepare and recommend to the City Manager a Procurement Guide for the purchase of General Services and Products for the City;
(f) Keep informed of current developments in the field of purchasing, prices, market conditions and new products;
(g) Prescribe and maintain such forms as are reasonably necessary to the operation of the purchasing system and other rules and regulations;
(h) Facilitate the reuse of surplus personal property between City departments and the sale of all personal property that cannot be re-purposed by any City Department; and (i) Maintain a central warehouse.

2.105.130 Additional quantities.

At the discretion of the Purchasing Division Manager, additional quantities may be purchased after the initial award of a contract or purchase order for General Services or Products. If the purchase of additional quantities or services increases the maximum compensation that Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 11 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
exceeds the City Manager’s signature authority set forth in this Chapter, or an amount previously approved by Council, then Council approval is required.

2.105.140 Competitive requirements for purchases.

The City shall when practicable engage in competitive procurement . The Purchasing Division Manager shall use the following procu rement methods under the circumstance s described below:
(a) Purchase orders and agreements when the total taxable amoun t, exclusive of frei ght and shipping cost, is estimated not to excee d fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) may be made without a competitive procurement metho d.
(b) Informal request for quotes shall be use d for purchases of Products or General Services with a total taxable amount estimated to be greater than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) and up to and includin g two hundred fifty th ousand dollars ($250,000). Award factor s may be based on either the lowest responsible and responsive qu ote, or quote which offers the best value for the City, as specified in Section 2.105.160(b) and Section 2.105.160(c), respectively. (c) Formal request for pr oposals shall be used for purchases of General Services when the total taxable amoun t is estimated to be more than two hundred fifty th ousand dollars ($250,000). Award factors shall be based on the proposal which offe rs the best value for the City, as specified in Section 2.105.1 60(c).
(d) Formal request for bids shall be used for purchase of Products when the total taxable amount is estimated to be greater than two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), or for General Servic es when the Purchasing Divi sion Manager determines that it is appropriate to do so. Award factor shall be based on lowe st responsible and respons ive bid as specifie d in Section 2.105.160(b).

2.105.150 Formal competitive bids or proposals; use of electronic media; reverse auctions.
(a) Sealed bids or proposals shall be submitted to the purchasing division at the time and place specified in the procurement not ice. At the time and place prescribed in said notice, the bids shall be publicly open a nd declare the aggregate bid of each bidder. The Purchasing Division Manager shall examine the bids and prepare a written report and r ecommendation. (b) The use of e lectronic media is authorized for the formal competitive process, in cluding without limitation s ubmission, opening and reporting of bids or proposals electronically, provided that such use sh all be governed by the Procurement Guide as define d in this Chapter. The administrative procedure shall include measures as the Purchasing Division Manager deems appropriate f or security of the competitive process, approval and award processes, and the accurate retrieval or conversion of electronic inf ormation into a mediu m which permits inspection and copying.
(c) When the Purchasing Division Manag er finds it to be in the best inte rest of the City based on the circumstances of the particul ar procurement, t he Purchasing Division Manager in his or her discretion may procure by reverse auction purchases o f Products requiring formal bidding, which goods a re readily availabl e in the mark etplace, highly st andardized, and can be supplied by a reasonable n umber of qualified competitors.

2.105.160 Award of contracts.
(a) Award factors generally:

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 12 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(1) The Purchasing Divis ion Manager shall award the contrac t in accordance with the award factors and respective w eights outlined in the solicitation. The award de cision shall be do cumented a nd available for public inspection.

(b) Award factors for informal quotes and formal bids.

(1) Purchases for which informal quotes or formal bids are being us ed shall be awarded to the bidder who submits the lowest responsibl e and responsive quote or bid in accordance w ith this Section. The low quote or bidder shall be de termined based on the lowest total cost to the City including, but not limited to :

(A) Purchase price;

(B) Trade discounts;

(D) Life cycle costs;

(E) Operating efficiency; and

(F) Maintenance costs.

(1) Purchases for which informal quotes or formal requests fo r proposals are used shall be awarded to the bidder whose quote or proposal offers the best value for the City in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Chapter. In addition to the factors set forth in 2.107.170(b)(1) , the best value quote or proposal shall be determined based on but not limited to:

(A) Quality;

(B) Capabilities , expertise, and experience of the bidder;

(D) Ability of the bidder to pr ovide future maintenance, repair parts, and service;

(2) At the discretion of the Purchasing Division Man ager, any one or more of the award factors set forth above may be excluded from a procurement if the factor or factors are not applicable or prohibited by law .

(d) If the Purchasing Division Manager determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue a solicitation for the pr ocurement of goods or services of indefinite quantities and/or with indefinite delivery dates that requires formal or informal bidding, or the most adv antageous quotes or proposals, the solicitati on may allow for the a ward to multiple bidders in order of t he lowest bids or best value. When multiple awards have be en made under such circumstances, then at the time that actual pu rchases are made, the ch oice between or among the selected bidders shall be ba sed on a consideration of factors, including but not li mited to the foll owing:

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 13 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(A) Lowest total cost to the City;

(B) Availability;

(D) Capabilities and/or expertise.

2.105.170 Notice inviting bids.
(a) The notice inviting bids shall be published in at least one of the following manners:
(1) In a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least once, not less than ten days before the date set for opening bids;
(2) As a posting on the City’s website or City designated website for such postings; or (3) At City Hall for a period of not less than ten days before the date set for opening bids.

2.105.180 Bidders’ security.

The Purchasing Division Manager may require, at his or her discretion, a bidders’ security as required by the bid documents that shall be presented under sealed cover or other appropriate means. If the successful bidder fails to execute the contract within the time specified in the notice inviting bids or in the specifications referred to therein, the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee may declare that the successful bidder has forfeited its bidders’ security to the City and any bonds so forfeited may be prosecuted and collected and the amount of the security paid into the general fund. Unsuccessful bidders shall be entitled to the return of their bidders’ security. The form and amount of such security shall be described in the notice inviting bids or in the specifications referred to therein.

2.105.190 Performance and payment bonds.

To secure faithful performance of the contract, the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee is authorized to require security in the form of cash, cashier’s check, certified checks, or corporate faithful performance and payment bonds, in such amount as he/she deems reasonably necessary to protect the best interests of the City. If the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee requires such security, the form and amount thereof shall be described in the notice inviting bids or in the specifications referred to therein.

2.105.200 Rejection of bids or proposals.

The Purchasing Division Manager or designee may reject any or all bids or proposals. If all bids or proposals are rejected, the Purchasing Division Manager or designee may re-notice the solicitation, or award without further complying with the provisions of this Chapter if re- advertising is determined to be an idle act.

2.105.210 Tie bids.

If two or more bids are for the same amount and are the lowest bids, the Purchasing Division Manager may select the winning bidder at his or her discretion.

2.105.220 Procedure when no bids or proposals received.

If no bids or proposals are received, the Purchasing Division Manager or designee may re- advertise or may otherwise acquire in the open market without further complying with the provisions of this Chapter.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 14 of 18
Rev: 09/2019

2.105.230 Bid or Proposal irregularities or informalities The Purchasing Division Manager shall have the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities in bids or proposals.

2.105.240 Protest Procedures
The Purchasing Division Manager shall, in the Procurement Guide, establish a process for reviewing and responding to award protests.

2.105.250 Procurements where competitive methods are not practicable.

The City is not required to engage in a competitive procurement under the fol lowing circumstances:
(a) Emergency purchases pursuant to Section 2.105.260 of this Chapter. (b) Public agency purchases pursuant to Section 2.105. 270 of this Chapter. (c) Single or Sole Source purchases pursuant to 2.105.280 of this Chapter. (d) Idle act pursuant to Section 2.105.290 of this Chapter.

2.105.260 Emergency purchases.
(a) In the case of an emergency involving the threatening of lives, property or welfare of the people of the City or the property of the City, the City Manager and/or his/her designee may purchase supplies, materials or equipment without formal bidding, as formal bids would be an “idle act” in such an emergency and may contract for General Services which the City Manager and/or his/her designee deems necessary for the purpose of meeting such emergency. (b) For the purpose of meeting such emergency, the City Manager and/or his/her designee may expend unencumbered moneys in any City reserve fund, notwithstanding the fact that such moneys may not have been appropriated for such purpose, to the extent that other moneys have not been appropriated or are otherwise unavailable therefor. (c) The City Manager and/or his/her designee shall provide a post-emergency report to the City Council on the use of any reserve amounts expended for the above purposes.

2.105.270 Purchases from other public agencies or through the utilization of Competitive bid processes of other public agencies.

The City, through the City Manager and/or the Purchasing Division Manager, may, without observing the competitive procurement requirements prescribed by this Chapter acquire Products or General Services as follows:
(a) Contract directly with any public agency for Products or General Services; (b) Contract, directly or indirectly, with a vendor based on an agreement negotiated by a joint powers agency, or non-profit organization that provide resources to public agencies and which the City is a member;
(c) Contract, either directly or indirectly, with a vendor under a contract awarded using pre- established cooperative purchasing agreements, when such agreements resulted from a competitive bid process that meets or exceeds the competitive bidding process of the City, as determined by the Purchasing Division Manager; or

(d) Contract directly with a vendor at a price and on terms obtained through a competitive bidding process of another public agency, even if the City has not joined with the public agency Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 15 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
in such competitive process or purchase. Any such competitive process shall meet or exceed the competitive bidding process of the City, as determined by the Purchasing Division Manager.

For the purpose of this section, the term “public agency” shall also include, without limitation, any nonprofit organization made up of at least one or more public agencies, which nonprofit organization has been approved by the Purchasing Division Manager for the conduct of competitive procurements.

2.105.280 Single and sole source procurements.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no specifications for the procurement of Products or General Services shall be written in a manner that limits the purchase to a single manufacturer or brand name product. A specification may reference a brand name if it is followed by the words “or equal” under circumstances where it is reasonably possible for equivalency to be demonstrated.
(b) A procurement shall be exempted from the requirements of subsection (a) of this section if the Purchasing Division Manager has determined that a particular Product or General Service may be specifically designated by reason of one or more of the following purposes:
(1) To acquire a specific product or performance for the purpose of conducting a field test or experiment to determine the product’s suitability for use; (2) When required to ensure operation or function to match other products with respect to the repair, expansion or completion of a system, existing structure or program currently in use by the City, including but not limited to, utility and technology purchases required to achieve interoperability with existing systems or programs; (3) When the purchase of an item is only available from one source (sole source); (4) When a service is considered unique or unusual such that requirements for competitive procurement are contrary to public interest; and
(5) In order to make an emergency purchase pursuant to this chapter. (c) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the inclusion in specifications of an industry standard with regard to performance that can be met by more than one product or manufacturer. (d) Purchases of General Services or Products shall not be segregated or conducted in any manner for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this section. (e) The Purchasing Division Manager shall establish written administrative procedures to carry out the provisions of this section.

2.105.290 Idle act.

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 16 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(3) Due to circumstances beyond the control of the City, the time necessary to use the competitive procurement procedure would result in substantial economic loss to the City or substantial interference with a critical City operation.

2.105.300 Purchase orders and contracts– Signature authority.

Pursuant to Section 400 of the City Charter, authority to execute contracts with third parties for General Services and Products provided to the City shall be granted to certain City officials as follows:
(a) The City Manager, or his/her designee, is authorized to execute purchase orders and agreements on behalf of the City in amounts up to and including two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000). Contracts with a value above these dollar limits require approval by the City Council. To determine the City Manager’s signature authority threshold, the estimated total taxable amount over a five-year period, inclusive of any option years, shall be used. (b) The City Manager is authorized to delegate all or a portion of such authority to execute contracts to specified City employees at his/her discretion. Such delegation of authority shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk.
(c) The City Attorney shall approve the form of all contracts made by the City. (d) A contract in the form of a Purchase Order signed only by the City may be issued by the Finance Director who may delegate such authority to the Purchasing Division Manager at his/her discretion.

2.105.310 Surplus personal property.

The purpose of this section is to maximize for the City the benefits of the prompt and efficient sale, auction or disposal of the City’s surplus personal property pursuant to Charter Section 1318, as follows:
(a) All City departments shall submit to the Purchasing Division Manager or designee at such times and on such forms as the City Manager shall prescribe, reports showing all personal property that is no longer used, that has become obsolete or worn out, or that has been acquired by the City as unclaimed property.
(b) The Purchasing Division Manager or designee is hereby delegated and shall have the authority to dispose of all surplus personal property that cannot be used by any City department or that has become unsuitable for City use as follows:
(1) When the estimated value is two thousand five hundred Dollars ($2,500) or less, by any method as determined by the Purchasing Division Manager or designee. (2) When the estimated value is greater than two thousand five hundred dollars ($2,500), at a virtual or physical auction conducted by an independent third-party auction house that is under contract for this purpose, or by posting the item(s) on the City’s website or City designated website designated for such postings.
(c) The Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee shall have the authority to exchange surplus personal property for, or trade in the same on new personal property without publishing a notice of intent to do so.
(d) City employees may bid upon or purchase any item for sale as follows:

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 17 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
(1) The Chief of Police may, without City Council approval, determine the disposition of a police service dog by means of sale of the police service dog to its assigned handler. (2) The Chief of Police may, without City Council approval, determine the disposition of a police service firearm, as defined in Penal Code Section 16520, by sale of the firearm in an amount equal to its depreciated value, to a sworn officer who is eligible for a retirement identification card endorsed for carrying a concealed firearm, in accordance with all applicable State and Federal laws.
(3) City employees, except for Finance Department employees or any other employee with administrative access to bidding software, may without City Council approval bid upon any item up for public auction.
(e) If State or Federal law, or public safety concerns, renders inappropriate the disposition of an item of surplus property in the manner set forth in this section, such item may be disposed of as required by law, or by any other method deemed appropriate by the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee, regardless of the value of the item.

2.105.320 Climate friendly purchasing
The City’s Sustainable Purchasing Policy should be followed to the extent possible. In particular, City staff should strive to purchase products that minimizes environmental impacts, toxins, pollution, and hazards to workers and the community to the greatest extent practicable, purchase products with recycled content, conserve energy and water, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, use unbleached or chlorine-free manufacturing processes, are lead and mercury free, and use wood from sustainable harvested forests.”

SECTION 3: Ordinances Repealed. With exception of the provisions protected by the savings clause, all ordinances (or parts of ordinances) in conflict with or inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed.

SECTION 4: Savings clause. The ch anges provided for in this ord inance shall not a ffect any offense or act committed or done or any penalty or forfe iture incurred or any right established or accruing before the eff ective date of this ordinance; nor s hall it affect a ny prosecution, suit or proceeding pending or any judgment rendered prior to the effective date of this ordinance. All fee schedules shall remain in force until superseded by the fee schedules adopted by the City Council.

SECTION 5: Effective date. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its final adoption; however, prior to its fi nal adoption it shall be published in accord ance with the requirements of Section 808 and 812 of “The Charter of the City of Santa Clara, California.” PASSED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PUBLICATION this 30th day of August, 2022, by the following vote:

Ordinance/Purchasing Code Update Page 18 of 18
Rev: 09/2019
AYES: COUNCILORS:

NOES: COUNCILORS:

ABSENT: COUNCILORS:

ABSTAINED: COUNCILORS:

ATTEST: ___________________________

NORA PIMENTEL, MMC

ASSISTANT CITY CLERK

CITY OF SANTA CLARA

Attachments incorporated by reference: None

Sections:

2.105.010 Definitions.

2.105.020 Organization generally – Director of Finance.

2.105.015 Repealed.

2.105.020030 Accounting services division.

2.105.030040 Municipal services division.

2.105.040 Administrative services division.

2.105.050 Computer servicesBudget division.

2.105.060 Financial management and treasury division.

2.105.070 Purchasing – Authority – Application.

2.105.080 Adoption of centralized purchasing system for supplies, materials, equipment andProducts and General Services.

2.105.090 Centralized purchasing – Exceptions.

2.105.100
Definitions.

2.105.110 Splitting of purchases or contracts for services.Products or General Services.

2.105.120110 Appropriation balance necessary.

2.105.130120 Purchasing Division Manager.

2.105.140 Purchasing process.

2.105.150130 Additional quantities.

2.105.140 Competitive requirements for purchases.

2.105.150 Formal competitive bids or proposals; use of electronic media; reverse auctions.

2.105.160 Single source procurementAward of contracts.

2.105.170 Bidding procedures – When required – Reverse auction – Exceptions.

2.105.180 Formal bidding procedure – Notice inviting bids.

2.105.190180 Bidders’ security.

2.105.200190 Performance and payment bonds for contracts.

2.105.210 Opening of bids.

2.105.220200 Rejection of bids or proposals.

2.105.230210 Tie bids.

2.105.240220 Procedure when no bids or proposals received.

2.105.230 Bid or Proposal irregularities or informalities.

2.105.240 Protest Procedures.

2.105.250 Low bidder determination – Criteria.Procurements where competitive methods are not practicable.

2.105.260 Local preference.

2.105.270 Award of contract.

2.105.280 Informal bidding.

2.105.290 Purchases from public agencies.

2.105.300 Emergency purchases by City Manager.

2.105.310 Open purchase 2.105.270 Purchases from other public agencies or through the utilization of Competitive bid processes of other public agencies.

2.105.280 Single and sole source procurements.

2.105.290 Idle act.

2.105.300 Purchase orders – Blanket purchase agreements.

2.105.320 General services – Definition.

2.105.330 General services – Contracting procedures.

2.105.340 General serviceand contracts– Signature authority.

2.105.350310 Surplus personal property.

2.105.360 Green320 Climate friendly purchasing.

2.105.010 Definitions.

(1) “General Services” includes, but is not limited to the following:

(C) Services performed under a grant agreement between the City and a grantee of a City program;
(D) Services for the design, fabrication or installation of a work of art; (E) Temporary staffing services; or
(F) Services performed under a concession agreement between the City and a licensee or permittee on City property.
(f) “Life-cycle costs” means the costs that the City reasonably should be expected to pay for the full life of a product, including the purchase amount, ancillary costs, and recycling and disposal costs at end-of-life.
(g) “Maintenance” means routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation, protection, and keeping of any publicly owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes in a safe and continually usable condition for which it was designed, improved, constructed, altered, or repaired. This definition of “maintenance” expressly includes, but is not limited to carpentry, electrical, plumbing, glazing, and other craftwork that is consistent with the definition set forth above to preserve the facility in a safe, efficient, and continually usable condition for which it was intended, including repairs, cleaning, and other operations on machinery and other equipment permanently attached to the building or realty as fixtures. This definition does not include, among other types of work, janitorial or custodial services and protection of the sort provided by guards or other security forces. Upgrades to facilities may be considered maintenance only if they are necessary to preserve, protect and keep the public facility operating for its intended purpose in a safe and continually usable condition for which it was designed, improved, constructed, altered, or repaired.
(h) “Person” means any business, individual, union, committee, club, organization or group of individuals.
(i) “Products” means supplies, materials, equipment, and software that are required for City operations.
(j) “Procurement” means the, sourcing, purchasing, renting, leasing or otherwise acquiring of any General Services or Products. “Procurement” also includes any function that pertains to obtaining Products or General Services, such as description of requirements, selection and solicitation of sources, preparation and awards of contracts, and contractual administration. (k) “Procurement card” means a charge card issued to an employee of the City of Santa Clara for the purpose of making authorized purchases on the City’s behalf. (l) “Procurement Guide” is a user guide, promulgated by the Purchasing Division Manager, that addresses the practical application of the provisions of this Chapter. (m) “Public works” means the erection, construction, alteration, repair or improvement of any public structure, building, road or other public improvement of any kind. (n) “Responsible bidder” means a vendor or contractor with the capability in all respects to perform all contractual responsibilities, that presents a bid amount that is competitive and reasonable, and has attributes of trustworthiness, quality, fitness, capacity, and experience to satisfactorily perform under the contract.

(o) “Reverse auction" means an internet-based process in which vendors compete to obtain business, the identity of vendors submitting bids but not the amount of the bids remains sealed during the time allotted for the auction, and vendors may submit successively lower bids, with the goal that bids submitted by ven dors will decrease over the time allotted for the auction.
(p) “Sole Source” means that there is only one supplier or contractor available for the required product or service.
(q) “Single Source” means that a particular supplier is purposefully chosen by the buying organization even when there are other suppliers with a functional equivalent of the product available.
(r) “Specification” means any description of the physical or functional characteristics or of the nature of a supply, service or construction item. It may include a description of any requirement for inspecting, testing, preparing a supply or service for delivery, or product to be used. (s) “Surplus supplies” means personal property owned by the City that no longer has a useful purpose. Surplus supplies includes, but is not limited to, supplies that are worn out, obsolete or unsuitable for City use.
(u) “Total taxable amount” means total price for products or services exclusive of shipping, handling, and any other associated charges.

2.105.015 Performance of City Auditor functions.

2.105.020

2.105.030 Accounting services division.

(d) Maintain an accounts payable ledger and manage the proper disbursement of all moneys in accordance with the City budget.
(e) Develop and implement expenditure control procedures over each office, department, or agency of the City.
(f) Prepare and record the biweekly payroll, voucher all claims against the City, and prepare the necessary warrants and checks for payment therefor.
(g) Maintain records correctly showing all the capital assets and liabilities of the City. (h) Prepare annual audited financial statements for the City and its agencies and other periodic financial statements and reports as required and requested. (i) Prepare for publication all required governmental reports having to do with the financial condition of the City.
(j) Compile data and statistics and develop financial analysis as required and requested. (k) Manage special projects as assigned.
(l) Manage production of the City’s annual financial reports, general-purpose financial statements, and annual comprehensive financial report.
(m) Manage the following ongoing projects:
(1) Reimbursement claims against the state;
(2) Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) updates; (3) Legislative review and updates;
(4) Internal audit of fixed assets for insurance reporting. (n) Perform internal control of Finance Department functions.

2.105.030 040 Municipal services division.

(e) Receive and have custody of all cash and checks received over the counter or in the mail by the City from any source and issue receipts therefor.
(f) Administer a computerized cash receipting system which tracks all payments received by the City. This system provides for real time verification of payments, encoding and endorsing of all checks and automatic posting of all transactions to the utility billing and business tax systems. (g) Deposit or keep safe all moneys received in such depositories as may be designated by the City Council, in compliance with the provisions of the State law governing the handling, depositing, and securing of public funds.
(h) Administer the business tax policies and related enforcement, as directed, including the billing therefor.
(i) Maintain and process all bankruptcy claims; and prepare and file various State and Federal reports.
(j) Coordinate and process numerous service contracts and equipment maintenance contracts. (k) Act as City’s representative for the receipt and evaluation of solicitation requests from charitable organizations.
(l) Manage special projects as assigned.
(m) Perform such other related administrative duties as may be assigned by the Director of Finance.
(n)
ReceiptReceive credit and debit card transactions.
(o) Adoption and Amendment of Municipal Services Division, Utility Services Rules and Regulations.
(1) Adoption of Rules and Regulations by Resolution. The City Council may, from time to time, by resolution, as it deems necessary for the administration or implementation of the intent of this Code, review, revise, adopt and/or promulgate new or amended rules and regulations concerning the operation or administration of the following:
(A) Finance Department’s Municipal Services Division, Utility Services Rules and Regulations [SCCC 2.105.
030040];
(B) Electric Department’s Silicon Valley Power Rules and Regulations [SCCC

13.05.040];
(C) Water Department’s Rules and Regulations for Water Service and Use [SCCC

new or amended rules and regulations concerning the operation or administration of the electric, water, sewer and/or street departments to govern the municipal and utility services furnished by the City. Such amendments may be in response to changing facts and circumstances which affect the operation of the City’s electric, water, sewer and/or street departments, or as a result of any applicable law(s) and/or regulation(s) implemented by the Federal or State government, their respective regulatory agency(ies), or local ordinance.

Any new or amended rules and regulations subsequently adopted by the City Council by resolution shall be incorporated by reference into this Code. (3) Responsible Parties. Customers of the electric, water, and/or street departments shall be considered as having given express consent to be bound by this Code and any City departmental Rules and Regulations subsequently enacted pursuant to this Code. (4) Responsibility for Enforcement. The primary responsibility for enforcement of the departmental rules and regulations shall be with the City Manager. (p) Enforcement of the Rules and Regulations. Except when more specific provisions pertaining to departmental rules and regulations are intended to supersede the provisions of SCCC

2.105.
040 Administrative services050 Budget division.

The administrative servicesbudget division shall be under the immediate supervision of the Assistant Director of Finance or a division manager, who shall be in the unclassified service.

The duties and responsibilities of this division shall be as follows:

(a) Manage and direct the activities of the Finance Department.

(b) Compile and produce the City’s annualbiennial operating and capital improvement budgets. (c) Produce annual updates to the City’s fiveten-year financial study. (d) Prepare and monitor long-range financial plans for the City and its agencies, including periodic updates as required.
(e) Prepare periodic and annual revenue forecasts.

(e(f) Analyze and prepare estimated revenue and expenditure updates.

(f
(g) Monitor and report the City’s Proposition 4 appropriations limit and general contingency reserves.

(g) Manage production of the City’s annual financial reports, general-purpose financial statements, and comprehensive annual financial report.

(h) Manage the following ongoing projects:

(1) Reimbursement claims against the state;

(2) Sales
sales and property tax audits;.

(3) Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) updates;

(4) Legislative review and updates;

(5) Internal audit of fixed assets for insurance reporting.

(i) Perform internal control of Finance Department functions.

(j) Provide administrative and clerical support for the Finance Department.

(k) Manage “risk management” programs for the City and its agencies, including, but not limited to,(i) Analyze and recommend options for budget balancing to the City Manager. (j) Monitor operating and capital improvement budgets, with regular reporting to the City Council.

(k) Coordinate the forecasting of general liability, earthquake, property and casualty, and other miscellaneous insurance coveragecosts and coverages (commercial or self-insurance). Also, administer the liability claims service agreement.

(l) with the City’s Risk Manager. (k) Manage special projects as assigned.

2.105.050 Computer services060 Financial management and treasury division.

The computer servicesfinancial management and treasury division shall be under the immediate supervision of a division manager, computer services, who shall be in the unclassified service.

The duties and responsibilities of this division shall be as follows:

(a) Provide the several departments of the City such assistance and advice in connection with the formulation and implementation of data processing procedures, systems and programs as are approved and authorized by the City Manager.

(b) Perform for the several departments of the City such data processing functions as shall be designated by the City Manager to be necessary and desirable.

2.105.060 Financial management division.

The financial management division shall be under the immediate supervision ofthe Assistant Director of Finance or a division manager, financial management, who shall be in the unclassified service. The duties of this division shall be as follows:

(a) Monitor the financing needs of the City and its agencies and manage negotiated and public- bid bond issues.
(b) Manage cash flow and invest idle cash in accordance with established policies and procedures and prepare monthly reports for the City and its agencies. (c) Manage the outstanding debt of the City and its agencies in compliance with established policies and various bond covenants and prepare periodic reports. (d) Compile data and statistics and develop financial analysis and forecasts as required and requested.

(e) Prepare and monitor long-range financial plans for the City and its agencies, including periodic updates as required.

(f
(e) Administer contracts between the City and its agencies and outside contractors for compliance with financial and insurance terms and conditions of these agreements, consistent with City policy.

(g(f) Manage special projects as required.

2.105.070 Purchasing – Authority – Application.
(a) This purchasing system shall apply to all purchases of supplies, materials, equipmentProducts and General Services, in whatever amount. (b) The establishment of a centralized purchasing system is authorized and directed by “The Charter of the City of Santa Clara, California” Section 1318 and Government Code Sections 54201 through 54205.
(c) When a purchase involves the expenditure of Federal assistance and/or contract funds, the purchase shall be conducted in accordance with mandatory Federal law and regulations. (d) Nothing in this chapter shall prevent the City from complying with the terms and conditions of any grant, gift or bequest that is otherwise consistent with law. (Ord. 1941 § 3, 6-16-15).

2.105.080 Adoption of centralized purchasing system for supplies, materials, equipmentProducts and General Services.
(a) A purchasing system is hereby adopted in order to: establish uniform procedures for the purchase of
supplies, materials, equipment (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as “personal property”)Products and services; secure for the City supplies, materials, equipment andGeneral Services at the lowest possible cost, while ensuring quality, quantity and availability; exercise proactive financial control over purchases; and clearly define authority for the purchasing function.
(b) There is also hereby created a centralized purchasing division, under the direct supervision of the City Manager or her/his designee, in whom is vested authority for the purchase of supplies, materials, equipment andProducts and General Services. (c) The purchasing system may includeallow for the decentralization of certain purchasing functions as appropriate while ensuring appropriate internal controls.

(d) The purchasing system shall require the Purchasing Division Manager to promulgate and maintain a Procurement Guide to serve as a user guide that addresses the practical application of the provisions of the Chapter.
(e) All purchases of supplies, materials and equipment exceeding ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00)Products and General Services shall require a City purchase order, and all general services require an executed contract. or signed agreement. Exceptions to this requirement include:
(1) Preapproved Procurement card purchases made in accordance with the City procurement card policy; and
(2) Payments made for ongoing City operations which are includedas described in the approved requisition listingCity’s Procurement Guide.

2.105.090 Centralized purchasing – Exceptions.

The following are exceptions to the centralized purchasing system:
(a) The City Manager may authorize in writing any City department to purchase, contract for, or specify supplies, materials and equipmentGeneral Services or Products independently of the centralized purchasing system, but it shall be required that such purchases or contracts be made in conformity with
these procedures and shall further require periodic reports from the City departments on the purchases and contracts made under such written authorization.this Chapter and the City’s Procurement Guide.
(b) Any contract for the purchase or sale of water, electrical power, fuels for the generation of electrical power, wastewater and recycled water.
(c) Any contract for a public work as defined by applicable State and local law, including, but not limited to, City Charter Section 1310 and Public Contracts Code Section 5100 and followinget seq.

2.105.100 Definitions.

As used in this chapter:

(a) “Appropriate bidder” means a vendor or contractor with the capability in all respects to perform the contract completely, that presents a bid amount that is competitive and reasonable, and has attributes of trustworthiness, quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform under the contract.

(b) “Architect-engineer and land surveying services” means those professional services within the practice of architecture, professional engineering or land surveying as defined by the laws of the State of California.

(c) “Brand name or equal specification” means a specification limited to one or more items by manufacturers’ names or catalog numbers to describe the standard of quality, performance and other salient characteristics needed to meet City requirements, and which provides for the submission of equivalent products.

(d) “Business” means any corporation, partnership, individual, sole proprietorship, joint stock

company, joint venture or any other private legal entity.

(e) “City” means the City of Santa Clara and any of its affiliated agencies.

(f) “City Manager” means the City Manager or his/her designee.

(g) “Emergency” means a situation where immediate action is required to preserve the public peace, health and safety and/or to avoid severe degradation of City property or a facility.

(h) “Idle act” shall mean that formal bids would not be useful or produce any advantage for the City. Idle acts include but are not limited to the following situations where:

(1) Specifications cannot be drawn in a way that would enable more than one bidder to meet them.

(2) It is impossible, as a practical matter, to obtain the supplies, material or equipment required and observe the formal bidding requirements.

(3) Due to circumstances beyond the control of the City, the time necessary to use the formal bidding procedure would result in substantial economic loss to the City or substantial interference with a critical City operation.

(i) “Informal bidding” means purchases based on at least three price quotations, which may be solicited by any reasonable means including, but not limited to, mail, telephone, fax, electronic mail or posting on the City’s or another public website for bids.

(j) “Invitation for bids” means all documents, whether attached or incorporated by reference, utilized for soliciting bids.

(k) “Life-cycle costs” means the costs that the City reasonably should be expected to pay for the full life of a product, including the Splitting of purchase amount, cost of supplies, recycling and disposal of the product.

(l) “Maintenance” means routine, recurring, and usual work for the preservation, protection, and keeping of any publicly owned or publicly operated facility for its intended purposes in a safe and continually usable condition for which it was designed, improved, constructed, altered, or repaired. This definition of “maintenance” expressly includes, but is not limited to: carpentry, electrical, plumbing, glazing, and other craftwork designed consistent with the definition set forth above to preserve the facility in a safe, efficient, and continually usable condition for which it was intended, including repairs, cleaning, and other operations on machinery and other equipment permanently attached to the building or realty as fixtures. This definition does not include, among other types of work, janitorial or custodial services and protection of the sort provided by guards or other security forces. Upgrades to facilities may be considered maintenance only if they are necessary to preserve, protect and keep the public facility operating for its intended purpose in a safe and continually usable condition for which it was designed, improved, constructed, altered or repaired.

(m) “Open purchase order” is a document issued to a vendor that establishes a line of credit allowing appropriate City employees to obtain supplies, materials, equipment or general services on an “as needed” basis.

(n) “Person” means any business, individual, union, committee, club, other organization or group of individuals.

(o) “Procurement” means the buying, purchasing, renting, leasing or otherwise acquiring of any supplies, materials, equipment or services. It also includes all functions that pertain to the obtaining of any supply, material, equipment or service, including description of requirements, selection and solicitation of sources, preparation and awards of orders or contracts and contractual administrationfor Products or General Services.

(p) “Procurement card” means a charge card/credit card issued to an employee of the City of Santa Clara for the purpose of making authorized purchases on the City’s behalf.

(q) “Public works” means the erection, construction, alteration, repair or improvement of any public structure, building, road or other public improvement of any kind.

(r) “Specification” means any description of the physical or functional characteristics or of the nature of a supply, service or construction item. It may include a description of any requirement for inspecting, testing, preparing a supply or service for delivery, or product to be used.

(s) “Supplies” means all property (including, but not limited to, equipment and materials) except as otherwise provided in this chapter.

(t) “Surplus supplies” means supplies that are worn out, obsolete or unsuitable for City use.

(u) “Total amount” means total price charged for a product, including tax, shipping and handling, and any other associated charges.

(v) “Total taxable amount” means total price for product on which sales taxes are charged.

2.105.110 Splitting of purchases or contracts for services.

No officer or employee of the City shall split or separate a purchase of supplies, materials or equipment,Products or a contract for General Services, for the purpose of evading the provisions of this Chapter. The acquisition of supplies, materials and equipmentProducts should normally be made as a single purchase when the need has been identified for multiples of items, related items, or similar items, which are ordinarily available from the same vendor or manufacturer.

2.105.120 110 Appropriation balance necessary.
(a) No purchase of supplies, materials or equipment, or contractExcept for general services, shall be entered into or executed by the City Manager unless there is an unexpended and unencumbered appropriation balance sufficient to pay the amount required by such purchase or contract or purchase order, except for an emergency purchasepurchases made pursuant to this

Chapter.

(b), no officer or employee of the City shall requisition, purchase or order any supplies, materialsProducts or equipmentGeneral Services unless there exists an unencumbered balance of an appropriation, or appropriations available for such purposepurchase, against which the requisition, or purchase or order may be charged. (Ord. 1941 § 3, 6-16-15). (b) When funds are not appropriated or otherwise made available to support continuation of performance in a subsequent fiscal year, the purchase shall be cancelled and the contractor shall be reimbursed for the reasonable value of any nonrecurring costs incurred but not amortized in the price of the Products or General Services delivered under the contract.

2.105.130 120 Purchasing Division Manager.

The Purchasing Division Manager shall be in the unclassified service and shall be the head of and have general responsibility for the purchasing division. The duties of the Purchasing Division Manager may be combined with those of any other department or position at the discretion of the City Manager. The Purchasing Division Manager shall, subject to the delegation and approval of the City Manager, have authority to or provide support thereof to:
(a) Purchase orand contract for supplies, materialsGeneral Services and equipmentProducts required by any City department in accordance with prescribed purchasing and bidding procedures, such administrative regulations as the Purchasing Division Manager shall adopt for the internal management and operation of the purchasing division and such other rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the City Manager set forth in this Chapter; (b) Negotiate and recommend execution of contracts or blanket purchase agreementsorders for the purchase of supplies, materialsGeneral Services and equipmentProducts; (c) Act to procure for the City the needed quality and quantity of supplies, materialsGeneral Services and equipmentProducts at the least expense or best value to the City; (d) Endeavor to obtain as full and open competition as possible on all purchases; (e) Prepare and recommend to the City Manager rules governinga Procurement Guide for the purchase of supplies, materialsGeneral Services and equipmentProducts for the City;

(f) Prepare and recommend to the City Manager revisions and amendments to the purchasing rules;

(g) Keep informed of current developments in the field of purchasing, prices, market conditions and new products;
(h) Prescribe and maintain such forms as are reasonably necessary to the operation of the purchasing system and other rules and regulations;
(i) RecommendFacilitate the transferreuse of surplus or unused supplies and equipmentpersonal property between City departments as needed and the sale of all supplies and equipmentpersonal property that cannot be usedre-purposed by any department;City Department; and

(j) Maintain a central warehouse; and.

(k) Maintain a bidders list, vendor catalog file(s) and the records needed for the effective operation2.105.130 Additional quantities.

At the discretion of the Purchasing Division.

2.105.140 Purchasing process.

The Purchasing Division Manager shall, subject to the provisions of the City Charter, this chapter and any other applicable law, establish a process for the purchase of supplies, materials and equipment.

2.105.150
, additional quantities.

Within the period of time extended by the bidder may be purchased after the initial award of a contract or purchase order for supplies, materials or equipment, the City Manager may purchase additional quantities at the award price of the specified articles, if the Council approved an option for General Services or Products. If the purchase of additional quantities. Within the period of time extended by the bidder after the execution of a contract or purchase order for supplies, materials or equipment by the City Manager, the City Manager may purchase additional quantities at the quoted price, if such an option for additional quantities is included in the proposal and the cumulative amount of the contract or purchase order, after adding the additional amount purchased, does not exceed the or services increases the maximum compensation that exceeds the City Manager’s signature authority of the City Manager for such a purchaseset forth in this Chapter, or an amount previously approved by Council, then Council approval is required.

2.105.160 Single source procurement.
(a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no specifications for the procurement of supplies, materials or equipment shall be written in a manner that limits the purchase to a single manufacturer or brand name product. A specification may reference a brand name if the specification is followed by the words “or equal” under circumstances where it is reasonably possible for equivalency to be demonstrated.

(b) A procurement shall be exempted from the
140 Competitive requirements of subsection
(a) of this section if the Purchasing Division Manager has determined that a particular product may be specifically designated by reason of one or more of the following purposes:

(1) To acquire a specific product or performance for the purpose of conducting a field test or experiment to determine the product’s suitability for use by the City;

(2) When required to ensure operation or function to match other products with respect to the repair, expansion or completion of a system, existing structure or program currently in use by the City, including, but not limited to, utility and technology for purchases required to achieve interoperability with existing systems or programs;.

(3) In order to obtain a necessary item that is available only from one source;

(4) In order to make an emergency purchase pursuant to this chapter; and

(5) In order to achieve significant cost savings based upon consideration of the following cost factors:

(A) Timeliness and quality of installation, repair and maintenance;

(B) Availability and quality of user training;

(D) Modification of existing equipment, materials or systems;

(E) Continued product service/support;

(F) Estimated amount and cost of reasonably foreseeable future purchases of equipment that would be required to be compatible or functional with the product that is the subject of the standardization determination; and

(G) Administrative costs.

(c) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the inclusion in specifications of an industry standard with regard to performance that can be met by more than one product or manufacturer.

(d) Purchases of equipment, materials or supplies shall not be segregated or conducted in any manner for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this section.

(e)The City shall when practicable engage in competitive procurement. The Purchasing Division Manager shall establish written administrative procedures to carry out the provisions of this section. use the following procurement methods under the circumstances described below:

2.105.170 Bidding procedures – When required – Reverse auction – Exceptions. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, all purchases of supplies, materialsPurchase orders and equipment,agreements when the expenditures for which equal ortotal taxable amount, exclusive of freight and shipping cost, is estimated not to exceed one hundredfifteen thousand dollars ($ 10015,000.00), shall be awarded to) may be made without a competitive procurement method.
(b) Informal request for quotes shall be used for purchases of Products or General Services with a total taxable amount estimated to be greater than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) and up to and including two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000). Award factors may be based on either the lowest responsible and responsive quote, or quote which offers the best value for the City, as specified in Section 2.105.160(b) and Section 2.105.160(c), respectively. (c) Formal request for proposals shall be used for purchases of General Services when the total taxable amount is estimated to be more than two hundred fifty thousand dollars

($250,000). Award factors shall be based on the proposal which offers the best value for the City, as specified in Section 2.105.160(c).
(d) Formal request for bids shall be used for purchase of Products when the total taxable amount is estimated to be greater than two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), or for General Services when the Purchasing Division Manager determines that it is appropriate bidder afterto do so. Award factor shall be based on lowest responsible and responsive bid as specified in Section 2.105.160(b).

2.105.150 Formal competitive bids or proposals; use of electronic media; reverse auctions. (a) Sealed bids or proposals shall be submitted to the purchasing division at the time and place specified in the procurement notice, pursuant to the procedures for . At the time and place prescribed in said notice, the bids shall be publicly open and declare the aggregate bid of each bidder. The Purchasing Division Manager shall examine the bids and prepare a written report and recommendation.
(b) The use of electronic media is authorized for the formal bidding set forth in this chaptercompetitive process, including without limi tation submission, opening and reporting of bids or proposals electronically, provided that such use shall be governed by the Procurement Guide as defined in this Chapter. The administrative procedure shall include measures as the Purchasing Division Manager deems appropriate for security of the competitive process, approval and award processes, and the accurate retrieval or conversion of electronic information into a medium which permits inspection and copying .

(b(c) When the Purchasing Division Manager finds it to be in the best interest of the City based on the circumstances of the particular procurement, the Purchasing Division Manager in his or her discretion may procure by reverse auction purchases of supplies, materials, and equipmentProducts requiring formal bidding, which goods are readily available in the marketplace, highly standardized, and can be supplied by a reasonable number of qualified competitors. “Reverse auction” means an Internet-based process that allows vendors to view each other’s pricing, but not their identity, allowing for more competitive pricing for the City.

2.105.160 Award of contracts.
(a) Award factors generally:

(1) The Purchasing Division Manager shall award the contract in accordance with the award factors and respective weights outli ned in the solicitati on. The award decision shall be documented and available for public inspection.

(b) Award factors for informal quotes and formal bids.

(1) Purchases for which informal quotes or formal bids are being used shall be awarded to the bidder who submits the lowest responsible and responsive quote or bid in accordance with this Section. The low quote or bidder shall be determined based on the lowest total cost to the City including, but not limited to:

(A) Purchase price;

(B) Trade discounts;

(D) Life cycle costs;

(E) Operating efficiency; and

(F) Maintenance costs.

(1) Purchases for which informal quotes or formal requests for proposals are used shall be awarded to the bidder whose quote or proposal offers the best value for the City in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Chapter. In addition to the factors set forth in 2.107.170(b)(1), the best value quote or proposal shall be determined based on but not limited to:

(A) Quality;

(B) Capabilities, expertise, and experience of the bidder;

(D) Ability of the bidder to provide future maintenance, repair parts, and service;

(2) At the discretion of the Purchasing Division Manager, any one or more of the award factors set forth above may be excluded from a procurement if the factor or factors are not applicable or prohibited by law.

(d) If the Purchasing Division Manager determi nes that it is in the best interest of the City to issue a solicitation for the procurement of goods or services of indefinite quantities and/or with indefinite delivery dates that requires formal or informal bidding requirements shall not apply in any of , or the most advantageous quotes or proposals, the solicitation may allow for the award to multiple bidders in order of the lowest bids or best value. When multiple awards have been made under such circumstances, then at the time that actual purchases are made, the choice between or among the selected bidders shall be based on a consideration of factors, including but not limited to the following instances::

(1) Purchase of supplies, materials or equipment, the expenditure for which does not equal or exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00);

(2) The purchase or acquisition of any supplies, materials or equipment from, or through an agreement with any public or governmental body pursuant to this chapter;

(3) The purchase of any supplies, materials or equipment that can be obtained from only one vendor or manufacturer pursuant to this chapter;

(4) The purchase of any supplies, materials or equipment deemed by the City Manager to be of urgent necessity for the preservation of life, health or property; and

(5) The purchase of supplies, materials or equipment where solicitation of bids would for any reason be an idle act, including the purchase of supplies, materials or equipment by the City Manager in an emergency or purchases made for ongoing City operations (which are identified in the approved requisition listing) pursuant to this chapter. (Ord. 1941 § 3, 6-16-15).

(A) Lowest total cost to the City;

(B) Availability;

(D) Capabilities and/or expertise.

2.105.180 Formal bidding procedure –170 Notice inviting bids. (a) Notices for invitation to bid shall include: a general description of the items to be purchased; the place where the proposal form, specifications and other contract documents may be obtained; and the time and place where bids will be opened. Prequalification processes may substitute for notices for invitation to bid.

(b(a) The notice inviting bids shall be published in at least one or both of the following manners:
(1) In a newspaper of general circulation in the City, at least once, not less than ten days before the date set for opening bids; or
(2) As a posting on the City’s website or City designated website, on a webpage designated for such postings; or
(3) At City Hall for a period of not less than ten days before the date set for opening bids.

2.105.190 180 Bidders’ security.

All bids shall include suchThe Purchasing Division Manager may require, at his or her discretion, a bidders’ security as is required by the bid documents andthat shall be presented under sealed cover or other appropriate means. If the successful bidder fails to execute the contract within the time specified in the notice inviting bids or in the specifications referred to therein, the bidders’ security may be declared forfeited to the City by the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee may declare that the successful bidder has forfeited its bidders’ security to the City and any bonds so forfeited may be prosecuted and collected and the amount of the security paid into the general fund. Unsuccessful bidders shall be entitled to the return of their bidders’ security. The form and amount of such security shall be described in the notice inviting bids or in the specifications referred to therein. (Ord. 1941 § 3, 6-16-15).

2.105.200 190 Performance and payment bonds for contracts..

2.105.210 Opening200 Rejection of bids .

Sealed bids shall be submitted to the City department or staff so designated in the notice inviting bids or specifications at the time specified in the notice inviting bids. At the time and place prescribed in the said notice, proposals.

The Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee shall examine the bids and prepare and file a bid summary.

The use of electronic media is authorized for the formal bidding procedure, including without limitation submission, opening and reporting of bids electronically; provided, that such use shall be governed by an administrative procedure promulgated by the Purchasing Division Manager.

The administrative procedure shall include measures as appropriate for security of the bidding, approval and award processes and accurate retrieval or conversion of electronic information into a medium which permits inspection and copying.

2.105.220 Rejection of bids.

In his/her discretion, the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee may reject any or all bids presentedor proposals. If he/she rejects all bids or proposals are rejected, the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee may in his/her discretion re-advertise for new bids. If the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee finds and declares that the amount of the bids was excessive, he/she may have such supplies, materials or equipment purchased at a lower price without re-advertising for bids or notice the solicitation, or award without further complying with the provisions of this Chapter. if re-advertising is determined to be an idle act.

2.105.230 210 Tie bids.

If two or more bids received are for the same amount and are the lowest bids, the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee may select the winning bid inbidder at his/ or her discretion.

2.105.240 220 Procedure when no bids or proposals received.

If no bids or proposals are received, the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee, at his/her discretion, may re-advertise or may otherwise acquire in the open market such supplies, materials and equipment without further complying with the provisions of this Chapter. In the event that bids are received, but none of the bids meet specifications, this section shall apply as if no bids were received.

2.105.250 Low bidder determination – Criteria.

The lowest appropriate bidder shall be determined based on the lowest overall total cost to the City including, but not limited to:

(a) Trade discounts;

(b) Shipping costs, when included in the specifications;

(d) The amount of sales tax revenue to be received by the City as a result of the purchase, as applicable pursuant to City Council policy. (Ord. 1941 § 3, 6-16-15).

2.105.260 Local preference.Share
(a) Subject to the limitations contained in this section, the Purchasing Division Manager shall extend a bidding advantage to a local business in the form of a one percent price preference in the evaluation of bids or proposals for the procurement of supplies, materials, equipment and general services.

(b) The following contracts are exempt from the provisions of this section:

(1) Contracts funded in whole or in part from grants, donations or gifts to the City if the provisions of this section conflict with any special conditions attached to the grants, donations or gifts, provided the special conditions have been approved and accepted pursuant to the donations policy of the City;

(2) Emergency procurements;

(3) Single source procurements.

(c) “Local business” means a business with one or more fixed offices and/or locally taxed distribution points within the boundaries of the City and a current, valid City business license.

(d) After a hearing before the City Manager or his/her designee, should the City Manager or designee determine that a price preference was received under this section through an intentional misstatement, the recipient of any such price preference shall be subject to a civil penalty of treble the dollar price preference received or one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), whichever is greater. The decision of the City Manager or designee shall be final.

2.105.270 Award of contract.
(a) Where formal bidding is utilized, contracts shall be awarded to the lowest appropriate bidder meeting specifications, unless the City Council rejects all bids.

(b) The City Council

2.105.230 Bid or Proposal irregularities or informalities The Purchasing Division Manager shall have the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities in bids or bidding. proposals.

2.105.280 Informal bidding.240 Protest Procedures
(a) Purchases of supplies, materials and equipment, which are not subject to the bidding requirements of this Code, may be made in the open market, without formal bidding.

(b) Purchases of supplies, materials and equipment that do not exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) may be made without price quotations, if such purchase is determined by the City Manager or his/her designee to be in the best interests of the City.

(c) Purchases of supplies, materials and equipment which exceed fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) shall, whenever practicable, be based on at least three price quotations and shall be

awarded on the basis of the price quotation most advantageous to the City. Price quotations may be solicited by any reasonable means including, but not limited to, mail, telephone, fax, electronic mail or posting on the City’s or another public website for bids. Records of informal bidding purchases and price quotations shall be maintained for the designated retention period.

(d) The most advantageous price quotations to the City for an informal bidding purchase shall be based on consideration of:

(1) Quality and performance of the supplies, materials and equipment;

(2) Ability of the vendor to perform the transaction as specified in a timely manner;

(3) Vendor’s performance on prior purchase by the City or others;

(4) Capability of vendor to provide ongoing service and support; and

(5) Capacity and experience of the vendor.

(e) If an award in excess of fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) is made to a vendor other than the vendor submitting the lowest price quotation, written reason for the award decision shall be prepared and will be kept as a part of the record of the transaction.

2.105.290 Purchases from public agencies.

The City Manager and/or his/her designee may, without prior City Council approval and without observing the bidding requirements prescribed by this chapter:

(a) Purchase or acquire any supplies, materials, equipment or power purchases from any public or governmental body or agency; or

(b) Contract with any public agency for the purchase or acquisition by such public agency for or on behalf of the City of any supplies, materials or equipment The Purchasing Division Manager shall, in the Procurement Guide, establish a process for reviewing and responding to award protests.

2.105.250 Procurements where competitive methods are not practicable.

The City is not required to engage in a competitive procurement under the following circumstances:

(1) Agreements for the purchase(a) Emergency purchases pursuant to Section 2.105.260 of supplies, materials or equipment directly from anotherthis Chapter. (b) Public agency; or purchases pursuant to Section 2.105.270 of this Chapter.

(2) Joint purchasing agreements entered into by the City and one or more public agency(ies) wherein the City is included as a potential purchaser under a formal bidding process engaged in pursuant to the joint agreement; or

(3) Direct purchases from vendors on terms obtained pursuant to formal bidding processes that name the City either specifically or categorically as a third party beneficiary of the bidding process or in the case where the vendor agrees to extend such participation to the City.

2.105.300(c) Single or Sole Source purchases pursuant to 2.105.280 of this Chapter. (d) Idle act pursuant to Section 2.105.290 of this Chapter.

2.105.260 Emergency purchases by City Manager.
(a) In the case of an emergency involving the threatening of lives, property or welfare of the people of the City or the property of the City, the City Manager and/or his/her designee may purchase supplies, materials or equipment without formal bidding, as formal bids would be an “idle act” in such an emergency and may contract for General Services which the City Manager and/or his/her designee deems necessary for the purpose of meeting such emergency. (b) For the purpose of meeting such emergency, the City Manager and/or his/her designee may expend unencumbered moneys in any City reserve fund, notwithstanding the fact that such moneys may not have been appropriated for such purpose, to the extent that other moneys have not been appropriated or are otherwise unavailable therefor. (c) The City Manager and/or his/her designee shall provide a post-emergency report to the City Council on the use of any reserve amounts expended for the above purposes.

2.105.310 Open purchase orders – Blanket purchase agreements. (a) Use. Open purchase orders or blanket purchase agreements may be used as a means of procuring supplies, materials or equipment when the amount or nature of the specific items cannot be determined before they are needed, or where it is necessary that the place from which the items are purchased is strategically located.

(b) Amount of Open Purchase Order. Open purchase orders or blanket purchase agreements shall be established for the full estimated annual amount to be expended with the vendor by the individual City department for which the open purchase order is established or by the Purchasing Division Manager for a City-wide blanket purchase agreement. An open purchase order may remain valid for a period up to but not to exceed twelve (12) calendar months from the date of issue.

(c) Maximum Purchase Limit. The maximum purchase limit of a single open purchase order or blanket purchase agreement shall not exceed one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) unless a formal bidding or reverse auction has taken place.

(d) Formal Bidding Not Required. Informal bidding should be utilized where practicable for open purchase orders or blanket purchase agreements of more than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) but less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00).

(e) Additional Factors in Awards. Because open purchase orders or blanket purchase agreements are established in order to obtain the most cost-effective purchasing arrangements for the City, the following factors may be considered in addition to the factors set forth in other provisions of

this chapter in determining price quotation to the City:

(1) Completeness of inventory;

(2) Quality of past service;

(3) Most favorable price discounts; and

(4) History of most competitive pricing.

2.105.320 General services – Definition.
“General services” means any work performed or services rendered by an independent contractor, with or without the furnishing of materials, including, but not limited to, the following:

(a) Maintenance of City buildings, structures or improvements, which does not require engineering plans, specifications or design, such as replacement of broken window panes, fire extinguisher maintenance, minor roof repairs, utility systems maintenance, elevator maintenance, custodial services and pest control. Work to be performed on City property shall require a service contract;

(b) Repair, modification and maintenance of City equipment and software;

(c) Cleaning, analysis, testing, moving, removal or disposal (otherwise than by sale) of City materials, supplies and equipment;

(d) Replanting, care, or maintenance of public grounds, including, but not limited to, trees, shrubbery, flowers and lawns, which does not require engineering plans, specifications or designs;

(e) Provision of temporary personnel services;

(f) Provision of other miscellaneous services to facilitate department operations; and

(g) Repair, demolition or other work required to abate nuisances pursuant to this Code.

“General services” shall not include contracts to be performed exclusively on property not owned, operated or maintained by City and valued at less than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00).

Work to be performed that falls into this category may be secured with another method of payment approval, such as a purchase order, a purchase card, or a petty cash reimbursement, based upon City policies as amended from time to time.

“General services” shall not include work performed by City employees, public agencies, or pursuant to collective bargaining agreements.

2.105.330 General services – Contracting procedures.

(a) Formal competitive proposals: at least three written competitive proposals shall be required for the following, except as provided in subsection (e) of this section:

(1) Utility department (i.e., Electric, Water and Sewer) general service contracts with a payment amount exceeding one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00); and

(2) All other department general service contracts with a payment amount exceeding fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00).

(b) Informal competitive proposals: at least three proposals shall be required for all other general service contracts, except as provided in subsection (e) of this section. Informal competitive proposals may be solicited by any means available. A record of solicitations and proposals shall be maintained as part of the record of the transaction.

(c) Contracts for general services shall be awarded on the basis of the most advantageous proposal to the City. In determining the most advantageous proposal, the following factors shall be considered:

(1) Cost to the City;

(2) Quality of the proposal;

(3) Capabilities and expertise of the contractor or service provider; and

(4) Adherence to applicable City policies and directives.

For service contracts exceeding fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) that are not awarded to the lowest bidder, documentation for the award decision shall be maintained as part of the record of the transaction.

(d) Contracts for general services valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) or more require written agreements prior to the work being performed.

(e) Exceptions.

(1) Regardless of contract value, competitive proposals are encouraged but not required for contracts for specialized services from licensed professionals;

(2) 2.105.270 Purchases from other public agencies or through the utilization of Competitive bid processes of other public agencies.

(a) Contract directly with any public agency for Products or General Services;

(b) Contract, directly or indirectly, with a vendor based on an agreement negotiated by a joint powers agency, or non-profit organization that provide resources to public agencies and which the City is a member;

(c) Contract, either directly or indirectly, with a vendor under a contract awarded using pre- established cooperative purchasing agreements, when such agreements resulted from a competitive bid process that meets or exceeds the competitive bidding process of the City, as determined by the Purchasing Division Manager; or

(d) Contract directly with a vendor at a price and on terms obtained through a competitive bidding process of another public agency, even if the City has not joined with the public agency in such competitive process or purchase. Any such competitive process shall meet or exceed the competitive bidding process of the City, as determined by the Purchasing Division Manager.

2.105.280 Single and sole source contracts, where the service or personnelprocurements. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, no specifications for the procurement of Products or General Services shall be written in a manner that limits the purchase to a single manufacturer or brand name product. A specification may reference a brand name if it is followed by the words “or equal” under circumstances where it is reasonably possible for equivalency to be demonstrated.
(b) A procurement shall be exempted from the requirements of subsection (a) of this section if the Purchasing Division Manager has determined that a particular Product or General Service may be specifically designated by reason of one or more of the following purposes:
(1) To acquire a specific product or performance for the purpose of conducting a field test or experiment to determine the product’s suitability for use; (2) When required to ensure operation or function to match other products with respect to the repair, expansion or completion of a system, existing structure or program currently in use by the City, including but not limited to, utility and technology purchases required to achieve interoperability with existing systems or programs; (3) When the purchase of an item is only available from one source (sole source); (4) When a service is considered unique or the available contractors providing the service are few in number;unusual such that requirements for competitive procurement are contrary to public interest; and

(3) Where the services are provided by a contractor included on a prequalified list.

(f(5) In order to make an emergency purchase pursuant to this chapter. (c) Nothing in this section shall prohibit the inclusion in specifications of an industry standard with regard to performance that can be met by more than one product or manufacturer. (d) Purchases of General Services or Products shall not be segregated or conducted in any manner for the purpose of avoiding the requirements of this section. (e) The CityPurchasing Division Manager or designee mayshall establish written administrative procedures and guidelines to carry out the provisions of this section.

2.105.340290 Idle act.

Idle act shall mean that a competitive procurement process would not be useful or produce any advantage for the City. Idle acts include but are not limited to the following situations where:
(1) Specifications cannot be drawn in a way that would enable more than one bidder to meet them.
(2) It is impossible, as a practical matter, to obtain Products or General serviceServices required and observe the competitive procurement requirements. (3) Due to circumstances beyond the control of the City, the time necessary to use the competitive procurement procedure would result in substantial economic loss to the City or substantial interference with a critical City operation.

2.105.300 Purchase orders and contracts– Signature authority.

Pursuant to Section 400 of the City Charter, authority to execute contracts with third parties for servicesGeneral Services and Products provided to the City shall be granted to certain City officials as follows:
(a) The City Manager, or his/her designee, is authorized to execute purchase general services required by the City orders and to execute contracts for such servicesagreements on behalf of the City in amounts up to and including onetwo hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150250,000.00) per electric, water and sewer service contracts, and one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) per all other service contracts, subject to approved budgetary amounts.). Contracts with a value above these dollar limits shall be referred torequire approval by the City Council. To determine the City Council for approval.Manager’s signature authority threshold, the estimated total taxable amount over a five-year period, inclusive of any option years, shall be used. (b) The City Manager is authorized to delegate all or a portion of thesuch authority to execute such service contracts to specified City employees at his/her discretion. Such delegation of authority shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk. (c) Such service contracts are subject to the final review and approval of The City Attorney for form and content.

(d) The maximum amount of the value of the service contracts which the City Manager, or his/her designee, is authorized to execute shall be adjusted as neededapprove the form of all contracts made by resolution of the City Council. .
(d) A contract in the form of a Purchase Order signed only by the City may be issued by the Finance Director who may delegate such authority to the Purchasing Division Manager at his/her discretion.

2.105.350 310 Surplus personal property.

(1)(1) When the estimated value is two thousand five hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) or less:, by any method as determined by the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee. (2) BetweenWhen the estimated value is greater than two thousand five hundred dollars and one cent ($2,500.01) and ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00):), at a virtual or physical auction conducted by posting notice of the intended salean independent third-party auction house that is under contract for at least five working days preceding the date of the sale.

(3) Ten thousand dollars and one cent ($10,000.01) and above: this purpose, or by posting notice of the sale for at least five working days and publishing notice of the sale in a newspaper of general circulation at least once and at least one week preceding the date of sale. The published notice will generally describe the personal property subject to disposal and designate the time and place of the sale or auction.

The notice (posted and published) will advise prospective purchasers that a complete list and description of personal property to be disposed of is posted or available atthe item(s) on the City’s website or City designated location(s). The Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee will generally follow the informal purchase bid procedures provided herein, with respect to receipt of written bids and the resolution of tie bids.website designated for such postings.

(c) The Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee may from time to time conduct public auction(s) in lieu of the written bid procedure or utilize an online government auction service, if the public auction procedure is determined to provide the greater or more efficient market

exposure for sales.

(d) The Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee shall have the authority to exchange surplus personal property for, or trade in the same on new supplies, materials and equipment,personal property without publishing a notice of intent to do so. (e) No City employeeemployees may bid upon or purchase any item for sale, except as follows:
(1) The Chief of Police may, without City Council approval, determine the disposition of a police service dog by means of sale of the police service dog to its assigned handler. (2) The Chief of Police may, without City Council approval, determine the disposition of a police service firearm, as defined in Penal Code Section 16520, by sale of the firearm in an amount equal to its depreciated value, to a sworn officer who is eligible for a retirement identification card endorsed for carrying a concealed firearm, in accordance with all applicable State and Federal laws.
(3) City employees, except for Finance Department employees or any other employee with administrative access to bidding software, may without City Council approval bid upon any item up for public auction.
(f) If State or Federal law, or public safety concerns, renders inappropriate the disposition of an item of surplus property in the manner set forth in this section, such item may be disposed of as required by law, or by any other method deemed appropriate by the Purchasing Division Manager or his/her designee, regardless of the value of the item.

2.105.
360 Green320 Climate friendly purchasing.

Whenever economically feasible, The City’s Sustainable Purchasing Policy should be followed to the extent possible. In particular, City willstaff should strive to (a) purchase products that minimizeminimizes environmental impacts, toxins, pollution, and hazards to workers and the community to the greatest extent practicable and (b), purchase products that includewith recycled content, are durable and long-lasting, conserve energy and water, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, use unbleached or chlorine-free manufacturing processes, are lead-free and mercury -free, and use wood from sustainablysustainable harvested forests. (Ord. 1941 § 3, 6-16-15).

City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022

REPORT TO COUNCIL

SUBJECT
Action on a Resolution Adopting the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan and Selection of a Preferred Design Concept

COUNCIL PILLAR
Deliver and Enhance High Quality Efficient Services and Infrastructure

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan (Plan) is a planning level document which identifies potential bicycle and pedestrian improvements along Pruneridge Avenue between Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. The goal of the Plan is to implement the City’s adopted Complete Streets Policy by enhancing Pruneridge Avenue to provide safe, comfortable, and convenient travel for all roadway users. Four concepts have been developed for adding bicycle facilities along the corridor and pedestrian safety and mobility improvements have been identified at 18 intersections.

These proposed concepts and improvements were developed based on analysis of the corridor, recommendations in the Santa Clara Bicycle Plan Update 2018 and Pedestrian Master Plan 2019, engagement with several committees and commissions, and numerous public outreach efforts. It is important to note that this is strictly a plan and does not guarantee funding for the design and construction of any proposed concepts or improvements. Development of the Plan included significant community participation and feedback, most notably with the support of the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC).

BACKGROUND
In May 2019, the City received a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Sustainable Communities grant to develop the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan (Attachment 1). In November 2020, the Council approved an agreement for design professional services with Alta Planning + Design to assist the City with this project.

The entire effort took nearly two years to complete and was coordinated with the City’s BPAC, Senior Advisory Commission, Parks and Recreation Commission, Youth Commission, various stakeholders, and the public. The Plan was a regular item on the Santa Clara BPAC Agenda, with the BPAC providing input and feedback at six separate meetings. On June 27, 2022, the BPAC reviewed the final draft and voted to recommend that City Council consider adopting the Plan and also recommended a preferred design option.

The Plan provides draft roadway concepts and possible enhancements to improve bicycling and walking along Pruneridge Avenue consistent with the City’s adopted Santa Clara Bicycle Plan Update 2018 and Pedestrian Master Plan 2019.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 1 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
Adopting this Plan and selecting a design concept will allow the City to apply for grant funds such as the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG) program or the Active Transportation Program (ATP) in order to be able to move forward with implementation. Additionally, it will help promote and advance the City’s Complete Streets Policy, which has a goal of creating and maintaining streets that provide safe, comfortable, and convenient travel along and across streets through a comprehensive integrated transportation network that serves all users, including pedestrians.

DISCUSSION
This planning level document focuses on a two-mile section of Pruneridge Avenue between Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. It identifies options for bicycle and pedestrian improvements to expand the existing bicycle network, complete bicycle network gaps, provide greater connectivity to public transportation, increase mobility, and encourage the public to choose more sustainable modes of transportation. It also includes potential options for parking removal and lane reductions and provides details on benefits including potential trade-offs.

The Plan is divided into five chapters which include:
(1) Introduction and Background
(2) Existing Conditions
(3) Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts, Corridor Transportation Analysis, and Pedestrian Improvements
(4) Community Engagement
(5) Implementation
An Appendix is also included with background information on existing conditions, parking utilization, traffic analysis, survey results, outreach materials, and collision data. Each chapter is summarized below.

Introduction and Background
Pruneridge Avenue is an east/west street near the southern boundary of Santa Clara, tying into Cupertino at the western city limit and San Jose at the eastern city limit (Attachment 2, Location Map). The majority of Pruneridge Avenue is fronted by single-family homes, and the City’s General Plan lists Pruneridge Avenue as a minor arterial street to include future bicycle lanes along the entire roadway within the City. Additionally, the Santa Clara Bicycle Plan Update 2018 recommended Class IIB buffered bicycle lanes along the entirety of Pruneridge Avenue.

Previously, all of Pruneridge Avenue operated as a four-lane roadway with two lanes in each direction without bicycle lanes. In 2012, the City re-configured Pruneridge Avenue between the western city limit and Pomeroy Avenue (0.85 miles) to become a two-lane facility with one vehicle through lane in each direction, a center turn lane, and bicycle lanes. In 2017, the City of San Jose re-configured the street east of Winchester Boulevard to become a two-lane facility with bicycle lanes, similar in design to the 2012 project. Completion of these improvements generated interest from the bicycling community to reconfigure Pruneridge Avenue to install bicycle lanes between Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester Boulevard (2.2 miles).

Existing Conditions
Staff collected data and completed traffic analyses to evaluate the existing conditions on the roadway across key metrics including safety, traffic operations, parking, and vehicle speeds. This analysis helped set a baseline for considering design concepts and identifying potential trade-offs between City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 2 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
these design concepts compared to the existing roadway configuration.

Safety
Recent available collision data was analyzed for the period of January 2015 through December 2021.

This analysis found a total of 60 collisions occurred during this timeframe. Of the 60 collisions, one collision was fatal (involving two motor vehicles), four collisions involved a bicyclist, and three collisions involved a pedestrian.

Traffic Operations
Detailed traffic modeling was completed throughout the corridor and 25 intersections (24 City Intersections and 1 County of Santa Clara Intersection) were analyzed along Pruneridge Avenue and other roadways, including Forbes Avenue, Homestead Road, Kiely Boulevard, San Tomas Expressway, and Saratoga Avenue.

The traffic analysis evaluated the overall Level of Service (LOS) for each intersection based on criteria established in the City’s Transportation Analysis Policy. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting shelter-in-place orders, the traffic analysis was completed using 2021 traffic data adjusted to pre-COVID-19 traffic levels. Traffic data was collected in early 2021 and increased based on historical 2018 and 2019 traffic counts.

Based on the analysis, all City intersections operate acceptably during the AM and PM peak hours, consistent with the City’s Transportation Analysis Policy (Level of Service D or better). The one County of Santa Clara intersection (San Tomas Expressway and Pruneridge Avenue) operates acceptably during the PM peak hour and unacceptably during the AM peak hour, per County standards (Level of Service E or better).

Parking Analysis
Current parking utilization was analyzed along Pruneridge Avenue and all side streets in a one block radius. Data was collected during three peak periods (7-9 a.m., 11 a.m.-12 p.m., 2-4 a.m.) from Tuesday, March 9 through Saturday, March 13, 2021. The analysis indicated that the average availability of parking across all three peak periods was 82 percent. Two areas were observed to have parking availability below 50 percent - the north side of Pruneridge Avenue between Saratoga Avenue and Cypress Avenue (40 percent availability) and the south side of Pruneridge Avenue between Saratoga Avenue and Harold Avenue (20 percent availability).

Vehicle Speeds
Speed data was collected at four locations along the corridor for a seven-day period during peak and non-peak periods. Speed survey data found 85th percentile speeds (the speed at which 85 percent of all motorists travel under) ranged between 34 and 41 mph. Although the speeds were generally higher than the posted 35 mph speed limit, the majority of drivers were traveling within 7 mph of the posted speed limit, which is typical of most urban arterial streets.

Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
The Plan identifies four roadway concepts and a no-build option that were developed and modified based on feedback from the community, commissions, committees, and Council (Attachment 3, Design Concepts). Each concept is summarized below:

City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 3 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
Existing Conditions/No Build - Four lanes with parking on both sides This scenario does not implement any improvements on Pruneridge Avenue and maintains the existing condition. There are four vehicle travel lanes (two in each direction), parking is maintained on both sides of the streets, no bicycle facilities are installed, and no pedestrian improvements are constructed.

Concept 1: Four lanes, parking removal on one side, & buffered bike lanes This concept removes parking on one side of Pruneridge Avenue and maintains four travel lanes. The side of the street where parking would be removed has not been determined in this concept and would be finalized during future design. Travel lanes are narrowed to reduce vehicle speeds and a Class IIB buffered bicycle lane is added on both sides of the street.

Concept 2: Two lanes, center turn lane, & buffered bike lanes This concept removes one travel lane in each direction, adds a two-way center left-turn lane, and maintains parking on both sides. Between San Tomas Expressway and Saratoga Avenue, this concept proposes two eastbound travel lanes, no parking, and the eastbound curb lane will become a right-turn lane at Saratoga Avenue (this configuration is required to meet County requirements).

Travel lanes are narrowed to reduce vehicle speeds and a Class IIB buffered bicycle lane is added on both sides of the street from Pomeroy Avenue to Winchester Boulevard.

Concept 3: Two lanes, center turn lane, & parking-protected bikeways This concept removes one travel lane in each direction, adds a two-way center left-turn lane, and maintains parking on both sides. Between San Tomas Expressway and Saratoga Avenue, this concept proposes two eastbound travel lanes, no parking, and the eastbound curb lane will become a right-turn lane at Saratoga Avenue (this configuration is required to meet County requirements).

Travel lanes are narrowed to reduce vehicle speeds and a Class IV parking-protected bikeway is added on both sides of the street. Parking is relocated between the bikeway and vehicle travel lane to act as a protective barrier between bicyclists and moving vehicles.

Concept 4: Hybrid Concept: Two lanes, Four lanes, center turn lane, transition areas, and buffered bike lanes or protected bikeways
This concept aims to improve bicycling and walking and minimize impacts to traffic congestion. The changes proposed by this concept are described below:
· Pomeroy Avenue and Luther Drive (Two Lanes)
: Remove one travel lane in each direction,
add a two-way center left-turn lane, and keep parking on both sides of the street. This concept also narrows travel lanes and adds a Class IIB buffered bicycle lane or a Class IV parking- protected bikeway to both sides of the street.
· Luther Drive and Gamblin Drive (Transition Area)
: Transition between two travel lanes and
four travel lanes. This concept maintains parking on one side of the street, narrows travel lanes, and adds a Class IIB buffered bicycle lane or Class IV protected bikeway to both sides of the street.
· Gamblin Drive and Saratoga Avenue (Four Lanes)
: Maintain four travel lanes, a two-way
center left-turn lane, and no parking on both sides of the street. This concept narrows travel lanes and adds a Class IIB buffered bicycle lane or Class IV protected bikeway to both sides of the street.

City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 4 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
· Saratoga Avenue and Harold Avenue (Transition Area): Transition between four travel lanes and two travel lanes. This concept removes parking on the south side of the street, narrows travel lanes, and adds a Class IIB buffered bicycle lane or Class IV protected bikeway to both sides of the street.
· Harold Avenue and Winchester Boulevard (Two Lanes)
: Remove one travel lane in each
direction, add a two-way center left-turn lane, and maintain parking on both sides of the street.

This concept also narrows travel lanes and adds a Class IIB buffered bicycle lane or a Class IV parking-protected bikeway to both sides of the street.

Corridor Transportation Analysis
The City completed an in-depth transportation analysis to evaluate the potential benefits and impacts associated with each design concept. This analysis evaluated the changes in key metrics including potential collision reduction, potential speed reduction, parking availability, end to end corridor travel times on Pruneridge Avenue, potential traffic division, and Level of Service vehicle changes. A summary table of the transportation analysis is included as Attachment 4.

Pedestrian Improvements
Pedestrian improvements at 18 intersections along the Pruneridge Avenue corridor were identified using the tools contained within the adopted Santa Clara Pedestrian Master Plan 2019 (Attachment 5). These improvements will enhance safety and pedestrian comfort along the corridor and generally include upgrading curb ramps, curb radius reduction/curb bulbouts, advance stop lines, and pedestrian countdown signals. Pedestrian improvements such as additional canopy shade trees and curb extensions with high visibility crosswalks are recommended at selected intersections.

It should be noted that the pedestrian improvements identified at the intersections of Pruneridge Avenue and San Tomas Expressway, Henry Avenue, Jill Avenue, and Winchester Boulevard require coordination with either County of Santa Clara or the City of San Jose, as these intersections are shared with neighboring jurisdictions.

Community Engagement
Community engagement was a major component of developing the Plan and a variety of outreach strategies were used to seek input from stakeholders. Outreach was conducted during three phases of the project: existing conditions, concept development, and traffic analyses. The following outreach methods were implemented over the course of Plan development:
· 23,238 postcards mailed to 7,746 residents along the corridor · Six Project informational signs along the corridor (with QR code to City Website) · Social media posts (i.e., Twitter, Facebook, Nextdoor) · City Manager Blogs
· Two Inside Santa Clara articles
· Seven Community workshops
· Five Stakeholder interviews
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 5 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
· Six Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meetings · One Senior Advisory Commission Meeting
· One Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting
· One Youth Commission Meeting
· Two City Events (Celebrate Santa Clara and Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony) · Three online interactive surveys
· City website and mapping tool
· Dedicated project email address and phone number
All community workshop presentations, recordings, and online surveys were posted on the project website: www.SantaClaraCA.gov/PruneridgeAvePlan
<http://www.SantaClaraCA.gov/PruneridgeAvePlan>.

Outreach Summary
Residents were provided multiple opportunities to provide feedback on the project. Attendees at the first two community workshops identified the community’s priorities for the Pruneridge Avenue corridor as follows (in order of importance):

1. Reduce traffic congestion

2. Improve bicycling options

3. Calm (slow down) traffic speeds

4. Improve walking conditions

5. Preserve on-street parking
Concepts and analysis results were also presented to the public for comments and feedback.

Attendees at five workshops and respondents to three online surveys identified the community’s preferences for the Pruneridge Avenue corridor. A table summarizing the responses received is shown in Attachment 6. About 55 percent of over 1,100 total responses supported a change in design of the corridor to add bicycle and pedestrian improvements.

Attendees at the final workshop and respondents to the final online survey identified the community’s preferred Concept. A total of 211 responses selected their first choice as follows:

1. Concept 3 - Two Lanes w/ parking-protected bikeways (33.2%)

2. Existing Conditions/No Build (25.1%)

3. Concept 2 - Two Lanes w/ parking and buffered bike lanes (24.6%)

4. Concept 4 - Hybrid Option (Two and Four Lanes) w/ parking and buffered bike lanes or protected bikeways (10.4%)

5. Concept 1 - Four Lanes w/ parking removal on one-side and buffered bike lanes (6.6%) City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 6 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
Implementation
The Plan identifies two potential approaches to the implementation of a selected concept.

Low-Cost - Paving, Markings, and Plastic Posts
The Low-Cost approach recommends using pavement treatments, traffic markings, and plastic posts.

Pavement treatments would be completed to improve roadway surfaces as well as eliminate traces of removed markings. New markings would be used to install new bicycle facilities. Markings and glue- down posts would be used to install corner bulbouts at select intersections. This approach also installs glue-down posts as physical protection between bicyclists and vehicles for the protected bikeways identified in Concept 3 and Concept 4 as well as corner bulbouts at select intersections.

This approach is estimated to cost $1.8 million for pedestrian improvements and between $2.0 and $2.5 million for bicycle improvements. All costs are estimated based on 2022 costs.

High-Cost - Paving, Markings, Plastic Posts, and Concrete Curbs The High-Cost approach recommends using pavement treatments, traffic markings, plastic posts, and concrete curbs. Pavement treatments would be completed to improve roadway surfaces as well as eliminate traces of removed markings. New markings would be used to install new bicycle facilities. Concrete curbs and sidewalk would be used to construct corner bulbouts at select intersections. This approach also installs concrete curbs as physical protection between bicyclists and vehicles for the protected bikeways identified in Concept 3 and Concept 4. This approach is estimated to cost $4.9 million for pedestrian improvements and between $2.0 and $3.4 million for bicycle improvements. All costs are estimated based on 2022 costs.

Funding
Currently there is no funding identified to design and construct any of the alternatives identified in the Plan. Information about possible funding opportunities that the City could pursue to implement a selected alternative includes the following:
· Local Source
o General Fund
o Silicon Valley Power Cap and Trade
o Traffic Impact Fees
· Regional and State Tax Programs
o County Vehicle Registration Fee
o Measure B Local Streets and Roads
o State Streets and Roads Program (SB1)
o State Gas Tax
o Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3
· Competitive Grants
o Active Transportation Program (ATP)
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 7 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
o Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
o Measure B (2016) Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Projects o Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)
o One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG)
o Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA)
At the June 27, 2022 BPAC meeting, BPAC reviewed the final draft Plan and recommended the following:
· City Council adopt the Plan and strongly recommends proceeding to add bicycle lanes to the corridor
· City Council select Concept 4 - Hybrid Option (Two and Four Lanes) w/ parking and buffered bike lanes.

In summary, the Plan presents four main concepts for City Council consideration besides the potential to select the ‘No-Build’ option. If Council selects a preferred concept, staff will begin the process to pursue funding opportunities for future design and construction phases.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The adoption of the Plan is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to Section 15262 of the California Public Resource Code. This is a planning document and future environmental action will be considered for the project contained within the Plan, should it move forward into design and construction.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no immediate fiscal impact resulting from adoption of the Plan. However, by adopting this Plan, the City will increase its eligibility for grant funds to implement a preferred design concept, should one be selected by City Council. It is important to note that there will be a future cost associated with implementing any of the proposed design concepts contained within the Plan. The costs associated for the design concepts range from $3.8 to $8.3 million (in 2022 dollars). There is currently no dedicated funding source to design or construct any of the design concepts; However, staff can explore potential grant sources to fund the design and construction of a design concept, should one get selected by Council.

COORDINATION
The Plan has been coordinated with the City Attorney’s Office, Community Development Department, Finance Department, Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, Senior Advisory Commission, Youth Advisory Commission, and Parks and Recreation Commission.

PUBLIC CONTACT
Public contact was made by posting the Council agenda on the City’s official-notice bulletin board outside City Hall Council Chambers. A complete agenda packet is available on the City’s website and in the City Clerk’s Office at least 72 hours prior to a Regular Meeting and 24 hours prior to a Special Meeting. A hard copy of any agenda report may be requested by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (408) 615-2220, email [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> or at the
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 8 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022
public information desk at any City of Santa Clara public library.

On June 27, 2022, the City’s BPAC reviewed the final draft Plan and recommended that City Council adopt the Plan and strongly recommends proceeding to add bicycle lanes to the corridor.

The BPAC also recommended that City Council select Concept 4 - Hybrid Option (Two and Four Lanes) w/ parking and buffered bike lanes (Alternative 7 below) as the preferred concept alternative.

ALTERNATIVES

1. Adopt a resolution adopting the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan

2. Do not adopt a resolution adopting the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan and direct staff to revise the Plan based on City Council direction.

3. No Build Option as the preferred alternative

4. Concept 1 (Four lanes, parking removal on one side, and buffered bike lanes) as the preferred alternative

5. Concept 2 (Two lanes, center turn lane, and buffered bike lanes) as the preferred alternative

6. Concept 3 (Two lanes, center turn lane, and parking-protected bikeways) as the preferred alternative

7. Concept 4 with buffered bike lanes (Hybrid Option - Two lanes between Pomeroy Avenue and Luther Drive, four lanes between Gamblin Drive and Saratoga Avenue, two lanes between Harold Avenue and Winchester Boulevard, center turn lane, buffered bike lanes along the entire study area, and parking removal on the south side of Pruneridge Avenue between Saratoga Avenue and Harold Avenue) as the preferred alternative

8. Concept 4 with protected bikeways (Hybrid Option - Two lanes with parking-protected bikeways between Pomeroy Avenue and Luther Drive, four lanes with protected bikeways between Gamblin Drive and Saratoga Avenue, two lanes with parking-protected bikeways between Harold Avenue and Winchester Boulevard, center turn lane, and parking removal on the south side of Pruneridge Avenue between Saratoga Avenue and Harold Avenue) as the preferred alternative.

RECOMMENDATION
Alternative 1: Adopt a resolution adopting the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan; and select one of the following
Alternative 5: Concept 2 (Two lanes, center turn lane, and buffered bike lanes) as the preferred alternative;
or
Alternative 7: Concept 4 with buffered bike lanes (Hybrid Option - Two lanes between Pomeroy Avenue and Luther Drive, four lanes between Gamblin Drive and Saratoga Avenue, two lanes between Harold Avenue and Winchester Boulevard, center turn lane, buffered bike lanes along the entire study area, and parking removal on the south side of Pruneridge Avenue between Saratoga Avenue and Harold Avenue) as the preferred alternative.

Reviewed by: Craig Mobeck, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Rajeev Batra, City Manager

ATTACHMENTS

1. Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan

2. Location Map

3. Design Concepts
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 9 of 10
powered by Legistar™
22-605 Agenda Date: 8/30/2022

4. Summary of Pruneridge Avenue Corridor Transportation Analysis.

5. Pedestrian Improvements

6. Summary of Outreach Responses

7. Resolution
City of Santa Clara Printed on 8/24/2022Page 10 of 10
powered by Legistar™
Prepared by
Alta Planning + Design
City of Santa Clara
Pruneridge Complete
Streets Plan
July 2022
2 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara City Council
Lisa M. Gillmor
Mayo
r
Kathy Watanabe
District 1
Raj Chahal
District 2
Karen Hardy
District 3
Kevin Park
District 4
Sudhanshu “Suds” Jain
District 5
Vice Mayor
Anthony Becker
District 6
City of Santa Clara Staﬀ
Craig Mobeck
Director o
f Public Works
Michael Liw
Assistant Public Works Director
Jonathan Yee
Transportation Manager
Carol Shariat
Project Manager,
Principal Transportation Planner
Stakeholders
Santa Clara Uniﬁed School District
(CUS
D)
The Old Quad Residents Association
Santa Clara County Public Health
Department (SCCPHD)
Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition (SVBC)
Apple
Boards and Committees
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Comm
ission
Senior Advisory Commission
Parks and Recreation Commission
Youth Commission
Consultant Team
Alta Planning + Design
Hexa
gon Transportation Consultants
Funding Provided by Caltrans
This study would not have been possible
without the generous fu
nding provided by
the Caltrans Sustainable Transportation
Planning Grant Program.

Acknowledgments
3 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara Table of Contents
Introduction and Background ......................... 4 Existing Conditions .......................................... 9 Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts.......16
Design Concept Analysis Findings .............. 34
Community Engagement ............................... 45 Implementation ............................................... 61 Cost Based Alternatives .............................. 62 Funding Options .......................................... 63 Appendices ..................................................... 66 A. Working Papers
• Existing Conditions Memo
• Parking Utilization Memo
• Future Volume Forecasts
• Tra ﬃc Analysis Memo
B. Survey Results
C. Public Outreach Materials
D. Collision Data
Introduction
and Background

01. 5 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

01. Introductionand Background
Study Overview
The City of Santa Clara obtained a Sustainable
Transportation Planning grant from Caltrans
to conduct the Pruneridge Complete Streets
Plan (“Plan”), intended to study a 2.2 mile
section of Pruneridge Avenue between
Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester Boulevard
for possible complete streets improvements to
improve multi-modal transportation options
(i.e. bike, ped) for residents and others, as
shown in Map 1. This grant is intended to help
improve pedestrian and bicycle connections,
safety, and accessibility across California.

The project began in December 2020 and sought
to gain a deeper understanding of the potential
EHQH¿WVDQGWUDGHRɣVWRFUHDWLQJD³&RPSOHWH
Street.” A Complete Street is a roadway which
provides safe and convenient travel along
and across the street for all users, including
pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities,
motorists, movers of commercial goods, users
and operators of public transportation, seniors,
children, youth, and families. Complete Streets
design concepts are intended to improve
bicycling and walking while addressing
existing issues and concerns from residents.

The Plan was developed through extensive
outreach with local residents and stakeholders,
including one-on-one interviews, seven
community meetings, and several online
surveys. Community priorities for the corridor
were established through interactive polling at
public workshops, and multiple online surveys.

These priorities helped guide the development
and evaluation of potential roadway concepts
and acted as a lens to evaluate concept designs.

Study Corridor
!!
!!!!
!!
!! !! Study Area Boundary
City Boundary
Parks
School
Existing Bike Facilities
Class I
Class II
Class III
Class IV
Map 1. Study Area
The project evaluated multiple years of collision
data along the Pruneridge Avenue corridor and
surrounding neighborhood to identify high
collision locations and incorporate potential
safety enhancements into concept designs. Each
concept design as well as the existing roadway
FRQ¿JXUDWLRQZHUHHYDOXDWHGIRUWKHLULPSDFW
RQWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVWKURXJKDGHWDLOHGFRUULGRU
transportation analysis of 25 intersections
along Pruneridge Avenue and parallel roads
surrounding the Pruneridge Avenue corridor. In
DGGLWLRQWRWUDɤFFKDQJHVWKHSURMHFWHYDOXDWHG
changes to vehicle congestion, corridor travel
times, and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT).

Results from the data-driven analysis are
summarized in this Plan with full memoranda
and methodologies included as Appendices.

The City Council will consider design options
and decide the best path forward given the
FROOHFWHGFRPPXQLW\LQSXWDQGDQDO\VLV¿QGLQJV
-•..
' '·
' ,- -- _ _.
' >-

0..
)(
w
w
(J
z ,_.,,. w
·- ~ . -' - --- - ---- - 3:. <(.
_, !
'
>-0 er w :;;
0 a..
..
____ HOME~TEAD RD _. __ .;___.s ... TU ... D~Y.,.;..;A.,.R..,_EA""_ "+'-'-'--'--''--'-'-':.c.c..~~~ "~

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
-1 -- • ••••• .. •••---~-mm~ ... ...,. ........ -_,.4,.,...,._...,.,.,..,,.,,. • ._,..,,.., .._.. . >- J -

MOORPARK AVE

0..
)(
w
"' <(
:.
0 ...
z
<(
"'
0 ~ a,
I=
0 (J
"'
i:
·~--~·-·-~---.. -~ .. ·-----·
6 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

01. Introductionand Background
Pruneridge Avenue
(Tantau to Pomeroy)
W. Hedding Street
(East of Winchester Boulevard)*
Corridor Context
Study Area overview
The study evaluates a 2.2 mile section
of Pruneridge Avenue with neighboring
city connections including W. Hedding
in San Jose and Apple Park in Cupertino.

Pruneridge Avenue is a minor arterial road
with a posted speed limit of 35 mph.

Neighboring segments
The length of the study area along Pruneridge
Avenue extends from Pomeroy Avenue to the
west to Winchester Boulevard to the east.

Pruneridge Avenue to the west of Pomeroy
underwent a roadway reallocation redesign from
four to two lanes in 2012, and the City of San
Jose completed a similar roadway reallocation
on W. Hedding Street to the east of Winchester
Blvd in 2017. The redesigns were done to
accommodate dedicated bicycle facilities, reduce
vehicle speeds, and improve safety. Pruneridge
Avenue changes names to W. Hedding Street
at Winchester Boulevard – the border between
City of Santa Clara and San Jose. A 2013 City
RI6DQWD&ODUDWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVVWXG\VKRZHG
that the section west of Pomeroy Avenue
*Located in the City of San Jose
TXDGUXSOHGZHHNGD\ELF\FOHWUDɤFDQGUHGXFHG
ZHHNGD\FDUWUDɤFE\SHUFHQWIROORZLQJWKH
redesign. This section of Pruneridge also had
a 15% reduction in total collisions compared
WRWKHSULRUFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ$&LW\RI6DQ
Jose collision analysis on the segment of W.

Hedding east of Winchester Boulevard following
WKHUHGHVLJQLGHQWL¿HGDUHGXFWLRQLQWRWDO
FROOLVLRQVFRPSDUHGWRWKHSULRUFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ
7 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

01. Introductionand Background
237
87 82
280
880
Central
Park
Guadalupe
River Park
Twin Creeks
Sport
Complex Sunnyvale
Baylands Park
Guadalupe River
Calabazas Creek
Saratoga Creek
Coyote CreekLevi’s
Stadium
Patrick
Henry
School
Kaiser
Permanente
Santa Clara
Medical
Center
Curtis
School
Santa Clara
High School
Mission
College
Adrian
Wilcox
High
School
Cabrillo
Middle
School
Herbert
Hoover Middle
School
Santa
Clara
University
Wilson
High School
Abraham
Lincoln
High School
Peterson
Middle
School

STEVENS CREEK BLVD

LAURELW
OOD

CENTRAL EXPY

WASHINGTON ST

CRONIN DR

HOPE DR

PARK AVE
HOM
ESTEAD
RD

MARKET ST

BELLOMY ST

CALABAZAS
BLVD

FORBES AVE

KIFER RD

HARRISON ST

SARATOGA AVE

TASMAN DR

WALSH AVE

KIELY BLVD

LAWRENCE EXPY

BOWERS AVE

SCOTT BLVD

MONROE ST

EL CAMINO REAL

LAFAYETTE ST

POPLAR ST

COLEMAN
AVE

LAFAYETTE ST

GARRITY WAY

SAN TOMAS EXPY

CENTRAL EXPY

CHROMITE DR

MONROE ST

SCOTT BLVD

WINCHESTER BLVD

CABRILLO AVE

GUADALUPE RIVER TRAIL

BAYLANDS PARK TRAIL

SANTA CLARA ST

BENTON ST

MARTIN AVE

ALDO AVE

STARS ANDSTRIPES DR

DE LA CRUZ BLVD

BASSETT ST

MARTIN AVE
M

AURICIA AVE
FO

REST AVE

CALABAZAS CREEK TRAIL

AGATE DR
AM

ETHYST DR

SCOTT BLVD
AUGUS
TI
NE DR

MISSION CO
LLEG
E BLVD

POMEROY
BR
O
OKD
ALE D
R

HARVARD AVE

LAWRENCE EXPY

PRUNERIDG
E AVE

SAN TOMAS AQUINO CREEK TRAIL

OLD MTN VIEW-
ALVI
SO
RD

GREAT AMERICA PKWY

LAKES HORE DR
AG
NEW
RD

LICK MILL BLVD
W

ARBURTON AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD
MON
TAGU
E EXP
Y
237
87 280
880
GuadalupeG alupepeuadaGuGuadaad
River Parker Parer Par PaRiveRiveRiv
reeTwin Creereeks
SportSp
ComComplComplexC Sunnyvale
Baylands Park
Guadalupe RiverGuadalupe RiverGuGuGGuGuuuuuGuuuadalupe RiverGuGuu Coyote CreekCoyote Creek
ckPatri kc
ryHenrr
oolSchoo l
HeHerbertHeeeHHHer
Hoover MiddleHoover MHoo Middleidi ddoovoovHHHHH eleeeeeleeeeee SchoolooSchoooooooooooooooooooooSchcccS
AbrahamAbrahamAAbbAbAAA mammmbbb
LinLincolnL
SchoolHigh SchooolScSc
PetersonPetersonnsonnP nnnnnn
MMiddle
SSchool

CENTRAL EXPYCENCC
EXPY

NCHESTER BLVDH DRE VBN

GUADALUPE RIVER TRAILGUA
E
AL
V
UPU
RT

LUPLUPU
VERV R

EEER I VE
V
EEE

BAYLANDS PARK TR
PA

TRAILRTR
S P
RRRR

OOOOOOLLLLLDDDDDDD

MTN VMTNM MTN V
Calabazas Creek, Saratoga Creek, and Hetch
Hetchy Trails are being analyzed separately
under the Creek Trails Master Plan project
Destinations + Boundaries
Source: City of Santa Clara, Caltrans, US Census, ESRI, VTA. Ma p produced March 2018.

City Hall
Train Station
Light Rail Station
USPS Office
Sport Stadium
Santa Clara Bicycle
Plan Update 2018
Recommended & Existing Bikeways
School
Hospital
Park
00 .51
MILES
Class I Shared-Use Path
Class II Bicycle Lane
Class IIB Buffered Bicycle Lane
Class III Bicycle Route
Class IIIB Bicycle Boulevard
Class IV Separated Bikeway
Recommended BikewaysExisting Bikeways
Bridge or
Undercrossing
Class I Shared-
Use Path
Class II Bicycle
Lane
Class III Bicycle
Route
City Bike Plan
Adopted Santa Clara
Plans and Policies
Both the City of Santa Clara and the SCVTA
have adopted plans which highlight the need for
bicycle facilities on Pruneridge Avenue. Adopted
plans recommend bicycle lanes on Pruneridge
Avenue. The Pruneridge Avenue corridor is
LGHQWL¿HGLQWKH&LW\¶V*HQHUDO
Plan as a recommended location for bicycle
lanes. Following the redesign of the two road
segments on either end, closing this gap in the
ELF\FOHQHWZRUNZDVLGHQWL¿HGDVDKLJKSULRULW\
UHFRPPHQGDWLRQLQWKH&LW\RI6DQWD&ODUD¶V
Bicycle Master Plan and a priority “Cross County
Bicycle Corridor” in the Santa Clara Valley
Transportation Authority (VTA) Countywide
Bicycle Plan. The Bicycle Plan Update 2018
UHFRPPHQGHGD&ODVV,,%%XɣHUHG%LF\FOH/DQH
as the facility on Pruneridge Avenue. Creating a
Complete Street design on Pruneridge Avenue
LVVXSSRUWLYHRIWKH&LW\¶V&RPSOHWH6WUHHWV
policy and resolution (No. 18-8593). This plan
DOVRVXSSRUWVWKH&LW\¶V&OLPDWH$FWLRQ3ODQE\
identifying strategies to improve bicycle and
pedestrian connectivity and reduce their level
RIWUDɤFVWUHVVLQRUGHUWRHQFRXUDJHPRGH
shifts from vehicles towards more sustainable
modes such as bicycling and walking.
:: .... / i
Ii :
r--- _if-- k :i.
--~~ .. ;. .. ~~,
_[""J ,.. .....
'
I
~i
)
r. ---,
,J
0 N
0 ,..........____
e
:····
- ("··-
t. f-.::..J
f'. ·, L •• ' . ,: [ <.
'\
~
I
8 0
e e
0 Celebrating Our
Past, Present and
Future
■
■
■
8 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

01. Introductionand Background
VTA Countywide Bicycle Plan
City Climate Action Plan
V
:S....U0¥1V.llllt't
ltMKPO!'liUon
~thotlty
final OWl1 May 2016 31
Strategy T2: Expand clean mobility options and use of non-SOV transportation modes Action T-2-1: Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan ~
Fund and accelerate implementation of the Pedestrian Master Plan and Bicycle Master Plan-focusing on 1) closing gaps in the bicycle and pedestr ian networks with a focus on high demand arteria ls; 2) installing painted buffers or phys;cal vertical elements on h;gh stress roadways documented ;n the B;cycle Master Plan; and 3) Implementing spot ;mprovements ;n high traffic areas (e.g., bicycle detection , bulb outs, and wayfinding elements)-such that walking and biking compr ise 6% of total city mode share .

Co-benefits :
► Enhances public health by encouraging act ive t ransportation.

Pruneridge Avenue looking West.

Existing
Conditions

02. Technical analysis helps evaluate potential impacts caused by roadway design changes before they happen.

The analyses presented in this plan quantify potential
impacts of the design now and into the future in order to DVVLVWGHFLVLRQPDNHUV.H\PHWKRGRORJLHVDQG¿QGLQJV
IURPHDFKDQDO\VLVHɣRUWDUHVXPPDUL]HGEHORZZLWKIXOO memorandums included in the Appendices.
10 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

02. Existing Conditions
Collision Analysis
The collision analysis was conducted for
the study corridor as well as adjacent street
segments on either end of the study boundaries.

On Pruneridge Avenue
(Pomeroy to Winchester)
The project obtained and evaluated historical
collision data from January 2015 to December
2021
1 to identify safety issues and potential
mitigations along the corridor. During this time
period, a total of 60 collisions resulting in an
injury or fatality were recorded; this includes one
fatal collision, four collisions involving people
biking, and three collisions involving people
walking, as shown in Map 2. This represents a
rate of .73 collisions per million vehicle miles
traveled on Pruneridge Avenue. This is slightly
higher than the 2017-2019 California average
of 0.60 for four-lane urban roadways

2. The
VLJQL¿FDQWPDMRULW\

RIWKHVHFROOLVLRQVRQ
Pruneridge Avenue occurred at an intersection.

Unsignalized intersections, typically two-
way stop controlled, experienced the largest
number of collisions with a total of 38; 18
collisions occurred at signalized intersections.

Adjacent to Pruneridge Avenue Study Area
The two segments of Pruneridge Avenue
which were redesigned between 2012 and 2017
present a case study for potential impacts of
a similar redesign within the study limits.

Pruneridge Avenue from Tantau to Pomeroy
was redesigned in 2012 from four lanes to two
in order to include bicycle lanes and reduce
vehicle speeds. After the redesign was completed,
collisions on this portion of Pruneridge
Avenue fell by 15%. Additionally, the segment
of W. Hedding (Pruneridge Avenue) east of
Winchester Boulevard located in the City of
San Jose saw a reduction in collisions of 33%.
1 Data obtained from the Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). Data does not include Property Damage Only (PDO) collision s as they are not tracked by the TIMS database. 2 2019 Crash Data on California State Highways (road miles, travel, crashes, crash rates) Map 2. 2015-2021 Collision Analysis
HOMESTEAD RD ;
. - - - - - - - - -r- - - - - .. - - - - - - . -
I•-••
' ' '
' ·-- --... I - - - .. -
> 0 a:: w
~
0 Q.

Cetnraii C.."''rlJII
-""~ c-,1p.,,t
-
Sf£.,,
1;.
~ .L
Ill r <
0 Study Corrido, 8-'.isting Bike Facilities
St dy A rea Bm.mda ry - Class J
- - - • Cily Bou-idary - Class II
Par~s - Class Ill
School -- Clc1ss IV
Colllslo11s by Mode
Bicycle
• Mo Lor Ve'11cle
11 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

02. Existing Conditions
7UDɤF$QDO\VLV0HWKRGRORJ\
7KHSURMHFWFRQGXFWHGGHWDLOHGWUDɤFPRGHOLQJ
throughout the project area, including at 25
LQWHUVHFWLRQV7KLVHɣRUWHYDOXDWHGWKHRYHUDOO
/HYHORI6HUYLFH
/26

3 of each intersection
XVLQJEDVHOLQHDQGIXWXUHWUDɤFYROXPHV
DQGFRPSDUHGWKLVWRWKH/26SROLF\FULWHULD
from the City for each intersection.
7KH3ODQHYDOXDWHGFXUUHQWDQGIXWXUHWUDɤF
RSHUDWLRQVZLWKWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQDQG
DOOFRQFHSWGHVLJQVDVVXPLQJSUH&29,'WUDɤF
levels. The City developed representative pre-
&29,'WUDɤFYROXPHVXVLQJDQG

WUDɤFFRXQWVLQWKHVWXG\DUHD7KHSURMHFW
developed an adjustment factor by comparing
SUH&29,'GDWDDQGWUDɤFGDWDFROOHFWHG
during shelter-in-place. This factor was applied
to data collected in 2021 at the 25 study
intersections, where there was no historical
data, in order to develop representative baseline
WUDɤFYROXPHVIRUDQDO\VLVSXUSRVHV7KH
FRPSDULVRQVKRZHGWKDWWUDɤFFRXQWV
needed to be increased by 63% for the AM
peak hour and by 42% for the PM peak hour.
7KHSURMHFWWUDɤFDQDO\VLVDOVRSURMHFWHGWUDɤF
operations out to 2030 and 2040. A growth
factor developed from Valley Transportation
$XWKRULW\¶VWUDYHOGHPDQGPRGHOKHOSHGWKH
&LW\GHYHORSDQGWUDɤFYROXPH
estimates and gauge future impacts.
/HYHORI6HUYLFHLVDQDQDO\VLVPHWULFWRGHWHUPLQHKRZZHOO DQ intersection is operating and assigns rankings from A-F where A UHSUHVHQWVIUHHÀRZXQLPSHGHGPRYHPHQWDQG)UHSUHVHQWVVLJQL¿FD QW FRQJHVWLRQ/26'LQGLFDWHVDFFHSWDEOHRSHUDWLRQVDWDOOVWXG\ LQWHUVHFWLRQVEHVLGHV6DQ7RPDVZKHUH/26(LVDOVRDFFHSWDEOH GXHWR WKHVLJQL¿FDQWOHYHORIWUDɤFZKLFKWUDYHOVWKURXJKWKDWLQWHUV HFWLRQ Corridors (East-West)
Cross Streets (North-South)
Pruneridge Avenue Forbes Avenue Homestead Road 0DXULFLD$YHQXH

1. Pomeroy Avenue 13. Pomeroy Avenue 18. Pomeroy Avenue 23. Cronin Drive

2. Cronin Drive 14. Woodhams Road 19. Woodhams Road 24. Woodhams Road 5DGFOLɣH'ULYH 15. Kiely Boulevard 20. Kiely Boulevard 25. Kiely Boulevard

4. Woodhams Road 16. San Tomas Expressway 21. San Tomas Expressway

5. Redwood Avenue /RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG /RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG

6. Kiely Boulevard

7. Tanoak Drive

8. San Tomas Expressway

9. Saratoga Avenue

10. Cypress Avenue
/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG

12. Winchester Boulevard
Figure 1. Study Intersections
Figure 2. Study Intersections
1 13
18 19 20
23 24 25
21 22
14 15
16 17
2 3 4 56 7 8 9 10 11 12

STUDY AREA
c. ...... ~-"'-~ FM .,.;;:_:;,
CM,~-
' : ·-· - __ ,_ .1
' ' __ San JoH! :
-~an·tn l::T,iri.,
'
---- ------------------------------- ------------------------ ---- ---------------------------------- i ,,
12 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

02. Existing Conditions
7UDɤF9ROXPHVDQG'HOD\
%DVHOLQH([LVWLQJ9ROXPHV
3UH
&29,'DGMXVWHG
There are approximately
15,000 vehicles a day that traveled along
Pruneridge Avenue pre-Covid with a nearly
equal split between eastbound and westbound
WUDɤF7KH&LW\FROOHFWHGYHKLFOHYROXPHGDWDRQ
Pruneridge Avenue for a full seven-day period
from February 23, 2021 to March 1, 2021 and
shows volumes along Pruneridge Avenue to be
around 8,000 vehicles per day. The comparison
shows that the current ADT on Pruneridge
Avenue is approximately 45% lower compared
to pre-COVID volumes. This data is highlighted
in Figure 3. Methodologies and assumptions are
included in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
([LVWLQJ,QWHUVHFWLRQ'HOD\ - The existing
IRXUODQHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRQ3UXQHULGJH
$YHQXHZDVDQDO\]HGXVLQJEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
YROXPHVZLWKDGHWDLOHGWUDɤFDQDO\VLVPRGHO
for 25 intersections along and around the
corridor. This analysis highlighted that all
intersections except the San Tomas Expwy.
/ Pruneridge Ave intersection are currently
RSHUDWLQJDWDQDFFHSWDEOH/26DVVKRZQ
LQ)LJXUH$IXOOEUHDNGRZQRIWUDɤF
operations analysis results are included
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
# Location EB WB Total EB WB Total
1 Pruneridge (Lawrence - Pomeroy) 7-day 4,076 4,188 8,264 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,141 4,236 8,377 7,451 7,622 15,073
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,877 4,017 7,894 - - -
2 Pruneridge (Pomeroy - Kiely) 7-day 4,093 4,045 8,138 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,176 4,107 8,283 7,392 7,269 14,661
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,841 3,832 7,673 ---
3 Pruneridge (Kiely - Saratoga) 7-day 3,920 3,569 7,489 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,090 3,580 7,670 7,626 6,675 14,301
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,595 3,398 6,993 ---
4 Pruneridge (Saratoga - Winchester) 7-day 4,421 3,858 8,279 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,448 3,851 8,298 7,724 6,688 14,412
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 4,223 3,709 7,932 - - -
Notes:

Average Daily Traffic
2021 Counts Pre-COVID 1
1 For segments 1, 2 & 3, ADT derived based on the assumption that approximately 11% of the total daily traffic occurs during the PM peak hour. For segment 4, ADT based on November 2018 daily traffic count.

Figure 3. 3UXQHULGJH$YHQXH([LVWLQJ$YHUDJH'DLO\7UDɤF&RXQWV )RUWKHSXUSRVHRIWKLVVWXG\/26'RUEHWWHU
is considered acceptable intersection operation,
DQG/26(RU)LVFRQVLGHUHGGH¿FLHQWRSHUDWLRQ
except for the Congestion Management Program
(CMP) intersections and intersections along
H[SUHVVZD\V/26(RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHG
DFFHSWDEOHDQG/26)LVGH¿FLHQW)LJXUHV
VKRZLQJWKHRSHUDWLRQVXQGHUEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
conditions for each analysis scenario display
the results for each study intersection using
these metrics. Detailed results are provided
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
13 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

02. Existing Conditions
Figure 4. Baseline (Existing) AM & PM
*LOS D or better is considered acceptable for all intersections; LOS E or better is acceptable for the San Tomas Expressway int ersection >c.

X w
w
(.)
z w a::
~
EarlR
Carmichael
Park
: STUDYAREA
>-0
0:::
w
:i
0 C.
-- -······ .. -·•···
•- •J .& L '- •- •J 4. ,._ ._ J ..I L
"
Central Central
Parl< Park
Cmr1IIP1/t
ct"""""''"'Y $TEAl'f

BENTON ST
d.
(/)
Mary Gomez
Par/< and Pool

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
~J••~-J••~-J••~~J~•~~J··~-J••~-J • •~~J••~-J••~-
>c.

X
w
CJ)
er
Baseline (Existing)

AM CD PM
• Acceptable *
• Unacceptable
· · · · · ·,. p--- N"EW H
• • • •• ■ ••• ■ •
M1ss10n City
Memorial Park
HEDC
FORES
\ .
\ .
,.
' • ,.
-study Corridor ·""- · -'• ·--· -"" t ·
Study Area Boundary
- - - • City Boundary
Parks
School
14 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

02. Existing Conditions

GAMBLIN DR

KIELY BLVD

JILL AVE

WINCHESTER BLVD

SLOAT CT

MARK TWAIN CT

HAYES AVE

CRONIN DR

REDWOOD AVE

DRAKE CT

CRESTVIEW DR

SARATOGA AVE

WESTRIDGE DR

KERRY DR

POMEROY AVE

HENRY AVE
RADCL

IFFE DR

TANOAK DR

LOS PADRES BLVD

LUTHER DR

SAN TOMAS EXPWY

CYPRESS AVE

HAROLD AVE

LANDEROS DR

BURNETT AVE

WOODHAMS RD

CEDAR WAY
Lightly Utilized
Plenty of extra spaces
Existing Parking ProhibitionHeavily Utilized
May have to park a block over
Target Residential Utilization
>50%30–49.9%15–29.9%<15%

AVAILABLE PARKING
Please note: parking data shown
represents results along Pruneridge and
one block north or south on side streets.
17 out of 28
available spots used
5 out of 36
available spots used

RADCLIFFE

TO WOODHAMS
12 out of 15
available spots used

SARATOGA

TO HAROLD
Figure 5. Average Total Parking Utilization: Existing Conditions (March 9-13, 2021) 3DUNLQJ$QDO\VLV
The project evaluated the current parking
utilization along Pruneridge Avenue from
Pomeroy Avenue to Winchester Boulevard,
including all side streets for up to one block
RɣRI3UXQHULGJH'DWDFROOHFWLRQRFFXUUHG
between Tuesday March 9 and Saturday March
13, 2021 during three distinct periods for a
representative analysis (7-9am, 11am-2pm,
and 2-4am). Figure 5 highlights the average
rates of available parking across all periods of
GDWDFROOHFWLRQ7KHVWXG\LGHQWL¿HGWKHKLJKHVW
area of localized parking demand between
Saratoga Ave and Cypress Ave. Furthermore,
this analysis indicates that 82% of the parking
spaces along Pruneridge Avenue are under
utilized throughout the day. (For the full report,
please see $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.)
f)
g,~
~~ o
iii
iii
@)
'''' '''' ''''
::J
::J
::J
-~
'''''' '''''' '''''' '''''' '''''' ''''''
'''' '''' ''' '''
'''
:J
:IC
lr----1 i[fr
15 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

02. Existing Conditions
CupertinoSan
Jose
Cupertino
Santa
Clara
San JoseSanta Clara
FWY

LAFAYETTE ST
F
O
R
E
S
T
A
V
E

HEDDING ST

SANTOMASEXPY

WINCHESTER BLVD

HOMESTEAD RD

MONROEST

SCOTT BLVD
N
E
W
H
A
LL
S
T

N IM IT Z FW Y

SARATOGA AVE

S A N TO M A S EXPY

KIELY BLVD

LAWRENCEEXPY

MOORPARK AVE
B
E
N
TO
N
S
T

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
JU
N
IP
ER
O
S
E
R
R
A
F
W
Y
Earl R
Carmichael
Park
Mary Gomez
Park and Pool
Henry
Schmidt
Park
Townsend
Field
Mission City
Memorial Park
Central
Park Central
Park
Pruneridge
Golf Course
Maywood Park
John
Mise
Park
Raynor
Park
Santa
Clara High School
Haman
Elementary
School
John Sutter
Elementary
School Millikin
Basics+
Eisenhower
School
Buscher
Middle
School
Westwood
School
Pomeroy
Elementary
School
Laurelwood
Elementary
School
Wilson High
School
Washington Open
Elementary School
Central Park
Elementary
STEAM

PRUNERIDGE AVE

STUDY AREA
Map 3. Pruneridge Avenue Average Speed Survey Results (7-days) Lawrence to Pomeroy
WB
85th % - 41 MPH
49% > 35 MPHLawrence to Pomeroy
EB
85th % - 36 MPH
22% > 35 MPH
Pomeroy to Kiely EB
85th % - 38 MPH
31% > 35 MPH
Pomeroy to Kiely WB
85th % - 39 MPH
44% > 35 MPH
Kiely to Saratoga WB
85th % - 34 MPH
9% > 35 MPH
Saratoga to
Winchester WB
85th % - 41 MPH
57% > 35 MPH
Saratoga to
Winchester EB
85th % - 40 MPH
48% > 35 MPH
Kiely to Saratoga EB
85th % - 39 MPH
39% > 35 MPH
Speed Survey
The City collected speed data at four locations
along the corridor across an entire seven-day
period during peak and non-peak periods in
order to gauge speeding issues on Pruneridge
Avenue. Pruneridge Avenue has a posted speed
limit of 35 miles per hour (mph). Pruneridge
Avenue westbound between Saratoga and
Winchester experienced 57% of vehicles traveling
faster than 35 MPH during the study period.

The speed survey showed that 85th percentile
speeds are generally higher than the posted speed
limit of 35 mph but within approximately 7 mph,
as shown in Map 3. Typically, arterial streets have
speeds within 7 mph of the posted speed limit.

Based on this survey, there is an opportunity to
reduce vehicle speeds through an application of
roadway designs and additional enforcement.

Potential Corridor
Alternative
Concepts
The City developed four redesign concepts
of varying intensity within the roadway. Each design
FRQFHSWDVZHOODVWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRU³1R%XLOG´ scenario, are described below along with the corridor
transportation analysis. A summary comparison between
design concepts is included at the end of the section.

03. 8’
12’ 8’
5’
5’64’CURB TO
CURB
12’
12’ 12’
8’
8’

PROPERTY
LINE
P
P

PRUNERIDGE AVE

PROPERTY
LINE
APPROX. 90’
ROW
17 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

INTERSECTIONS / CORNERS
Sweeping corners and long crossing distances for
sidewalk users promote higher vehicle speeds.

These intersection corner designs are based on old
design standards.

CANOPY TREES
Intermittent matures trees spread
along the corridor provide shade where
present. Most trees are on private
property setback from roadway and do
not provide shade for the sidewalk.

RESIDENTIAL CONTEXT
The majority of the Pruneridge
corridor is lined with single-family
KRPHVWKDWGH¿QHWKLVDUHD¶V
residential character

PARKING LANES
Curbside parallel parking is
present along a majority of
the corridor.

Existing Conditions /
No Build
/DQHV3DUNLQJRQ%RWK6LGHV
• ¶7UDɤF/DQHV
• ¶&XUEWR&XUE:LGWK
•
¶7RWDO52:
7KLVLVWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRQ
Pruneridge Avenue, present along a majority
of the corridor between Pomeroy and
Winchester, with four vehicle travel lanes
and parking on both sides with no bicycle
lanes and older intersection designs.
64’CURB TO
CURB
5’8’
2’
2’
10’ 11’ 11’ 10’
5’
5’5’

PRUNERIDGE AVE
P
18 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

CURB-EXTENSION & HIGH-

VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
(at select intersections)
enhances pedestrian safety by
increasing visibility and reducing
crossing length (short-term quick-build
painted option shown).

RESTRICTED PARKING
(red curb)
at intersection
approaches.

TRASH BIN

LOCATION
for pick up days.

SIGHT LINE
BUFFER
increase
sight lines at
driveways.

PARKING LANE
retains parking areas on one side
of the corridor.

BUFFERED BIKE LANES
on both sides of the corridor are provided
with striped buffers, similar to W. Hedding
St. east of Pruneridge Ave.
¶ELNHODQHZLWK
¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU

ADDITIONAL

CANOPY TREES
¿OOLQWKHJDSVIRU
shade and add to the
residential character of
the street, within public
ROW adjacent to back of
sidewalk.

INTERSECTION APPROACH CONSIDERATIONS:
Green-backed bike symbol at intersection approach for visibility Bulb-outs, option for curb extensions or short-term quick-build painted option 3DUNLQJLVUHVWULFWHGDWFRUQHUVZLWKEROODUGVDQGELNHODQHV LPSURYHGVLJKWOLQHVLVDFREHQH¿W Leading pedestrian phase and bike phase or indication Add vertical barrier to further protect bicyclists from right turn movements. If installed, vehicles are restricted from turni ng right on red.

Concept 1
)RXU/DQHV
5HPRYH3DUNLQJ2Q2QH6LGH
•M a i n t a i n f o u r t r a v e l l a n e s
• Parking on one side of roadway
• %XɣHUHGELNHODQHV
• Curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersection locations
• Canopy trees
This concept retains four vehicle lanes but
removes parking from one side of the street in
RUGHUWRDFFRPPRGDWHEXɣHUHGELF\FOHODQHV
LQERWKGLUHFWLRQV7KHEXɣHUHGELNHODQH
ZRXOGEH¿YHIHHWZLGHZLWKDWZRIRRWEXɣHU
between the travel lane and bicyclists. This
concept includes no changes to the existing
VLGHZDONV6LJKWOLQHEXɣHUVDWWKHGULYHZD\V
improve visibility for cars, bicyclists, and
pedestrians while aiding driveway entry/exit.
64’CURB TO
CURB
8’ 5’ 10’ 12’ 10’ 5’ 8’
5’
5’
3’
3’
P
P

PRUNERIDGE AVE
19 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

CURB-EXTENSION & HIGH-

VISIBILITY CROSSWALKS
(at select intersections)
enhances pedestrian safety by
increasing visibility and reducing
crossing length (short-term quick-
build painted option shown).

RESTRICTED

PARKING
(RED CURB)
at intersection
approaches.

TRASH BIN

LOCATION
for pick up
days.

SIGHT LINE BUFFER
increase sight lines at
driveways.

BUFFERED BIKE LANES
on both sides of the corridor are provided with
striped buffers, similar to W. Hedding St. east of
Pruneridge Ave.

PARKING LANE
retains parking areas on both
sides of the corridor.
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU

ADDITIONAL

CANOPY TREES
¿OOLQWKHJDSVIRUVKDGHDQG
add to the residential character
of the street, within public ROW
adjacent to back of sidewalk.

INTERSECTION APPROACH CONSIDERATIONS:
Include green-backed bike symbol at intersection approach for visibility Include bulb-outs, option for curb extensions or short-term quick-build painted option Add vertical barrier to further protect bicyclists from right turn movements. If installed, vehicles are restricted from turni ng right on red. 3DUNLQJLVUHVWULFWHGDWFRUQHUVZLWKEROODUGVDQGELNHODQHV LPSURYHGVLJKWOLQHVLVDFREHQH¿W Modify signal timing to include leading pedestrian and bike intervals Concept 2
7ZR/ D QH V
• Maintain two travel lanes
• Center two-way left turn lane
• Parking on both sides of roadway
• %XɣHUHGELNHODQHV
• Curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersection locations
• Canopy trees
This concept provides two travel lanes and a
center-turn lane with parking on both sides
RIWKHVWUHHWEXɣHUHGELNHODQHVFDQRS\
trees, and curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at selection intersections. Sightline
EXɣHUVDWWKHGULYHZD\VLPSURYHYLVLELOLW\IRU
cars, bicyclists, and pedestrians while aiding
driveway entry/exit. This concept includes
two eastbound through lanes between San
Tomas and Saratoga with the outermost lane
becoming a right-turn lane at Saratoga Avenue.

At full implementation, this concept may
UHTXLUHPRGL¿FDWLRQRIVLJQDOWLPLQJVDQG
incorporation of pedestrian and bicycle
intervals and bicycle signal heads.
8’
8’
5’
5’64’CURB TO
CURB
5’
5’
3’
3’
10’ 12’ 10’
P
P

PRUNERIDGE AVE
20 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

CURB-EXTENSION & HIGH-VISIBILITY
CROSSWALKS (at select intersections)
enhances pedestrian safety by increasing
visibility and reducing crossing length (short-term
quick-build painted option shown).

TRASH BIN

LOCATION
for pick up
days.

SIGHT LINE BUFFER
increase sight lines at
driveways.

PARKING LANE
retains parking areas
on both sides of the
corridor, protects
bicyclists, and
maintains clear sight
lines from driveways.

SEPARATED BIKEWAY
on both sides of the corridor are further
VHSDUDWHGIURPWUDI¿FZLWKSDUNLQJODQHWKH
¶EXIIHUVHSDUDWHVELF\FOLVWVIURPWKRVH
opening their door.
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU

ADDITIONAL

CANOPY TREES
¿OOLQWKHJDSVIRUVKDGH
and add to the residential
character of the street,
within public ROW adjacent
to back of sidewalk.

INTERSECTION APPROACH CONSIDERATIONS:
Include green-backed bike symbol at intersection approach for visibility Include bulb-outs, option for curb extensions or short-term quick-build painted option 3DUNLQJLVUHVWULFWHGDWFRUQHUVZLWKEROODUGVDQGELNHODQHV LPSURYHGVLJKWOLQHVLVDFREHQH¿W Modify signal timing to include leading pedestrian and bike intervals Vehicles are restricted from turning right on red.

Concept 3
3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG6HSDUDWHG%LNHZD\
• Maintain two travel lanes
•T w o - w a y c e n t e r - t u r n l a n e
• Parking on both sides of roadway
•P a r k i n g p r o v i d e s p h y s i c a l
separation for cyclist
• %XɣHUVVLGHZDONZLWKELNHODQHDQGSDUNLQJ
• Curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersection locations
• Canopy trees
Similar to Concept 2, this concept also provides
two travel lanes, a center-turn lane, parking
on both sides of the road, canopy trees, and
curb-extensions and high-visibility crosswalks
at select intersections. This concept includes
two eastbound through lanes between San
Tomas and Saratoga with the outermost
lane becoming a right-turn lane at Saratoga
$YHQXH7KHNH\GLɣHUHQFHEHWZHHQ&RQFHSWV
2 and 3 is an exchange between the bicycle
lane and the parking to create a ‘parking
SURWHFWHG¶ELNHODQHZKLFKLVSK\VLFDOO\
separated from moving vehicles. Sightline
EXɣHUVDWWKHGULYHZD\VLPSURYHYLVLELOLW\IRU
cars, bicyclists, and pedestrians while aiding
driveway entry/exit. At full implementation,
WKLVFRQFHSWPD\UHTXLUHPRGL¿FDWLRQRIVLJQDO
timings and incorporation of pedestrian and
bicycle intervals and bicycle signal heads.
21 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Concept 4
The Hybrid Concept
• Created to meet project goals and
UHGXFHWUDɤFFRQJHVWLRQEDVHGRQ
community and Council feedback.
• %XɣHUHGELNHODQHVRUVHSDUDWHG
bikeways along entire corridor.
• 0LQLPL]H/HYHORI6HUYLFHLPSDFWV
at critical intersections
• %XɣHUVVLGHZDONZLWKELNHODQHDQGSDUNLQJ
• Improves pedestrian and bicyclist
visibility at intersections
This concept combines numerous elements
from the three previous concepts to strike a
balance between modal considerations. This
FRQFHSWKDVWZRGLɣHUHQWGHVLJQYDULDWLRQV

• :LWK%XɣHUHG%LNH/DQHV
&ODVV,,%
RU

• With Parking-Protected
%LNH/DQHV
&ODVV,9

Under each design variation, this concept
ZRXOGUHFRQ¿JXUHWKHSRUWLRQRIWKHURDGZD\
EHWZHHQ3RPHUR\$YHQXHDQG/XWKHU'ULYH
as well as Harold Avenue to Winchester
Boulevard, to have two travel lanes in each
direction with a center-turn lane (Concept
2/3). The center section would include four
ten-foot-wide travel lanes and a center-turn
ODQHDORQJZLWKEXɣHUHGELNHODQHVVKRZQ
on the next page. The road would transition
EHWZHHQWKHVHGLɣHUHQWFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVWKURXJK
PXOWLEORFNVHFWLRQVIURP/XWKHU'ULYHWR
*DPEOLQ'ULYHDQGIURP6DUDWRJD$YHQXH
to Harold Avenue, as shown to the right.

Map 4. Concept 4 Segment Map
Two-Lanes
Transition ,,,.
~
Ill r <
C
.,_
Ill
/tlill}'Gomez
Patl< andPool
Four-Lanes
Traa"s'.ition ,
I
M'is 1Q11C1ty ,
Two-1:-anei"' i
, c
I =i
I ID
I 0::

I UJ
'1ti UJ
t· : ~ ~ -----l 3:

HEDI
FORES

PRUNERIDGE AVE
64’CURB TO
CURB
8’ 5’ 10’ 12’ 10’
5’ 8’
5’
5’
3’
3’
P
P
22 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Concept 4
&RUULGRU0DS
• This concept was produced in response to
concerns expressed about the vehicle travel time
delay possible with Concept 2 and Concept 3.
• This concept transitions the roadway between
sections with four travel lanes and two travel
lanes at the approach to the intersections of
*DPEOLQDQG6DUDWRJDWRUHGXFHWUDɤFGHOD\V
• &RQFHSWKDVWZRGLVWLQFWGHVLJQYDULDWLRQV

Ń :LWK%XɣHUHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW
RU
Ń :LWK3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW

TRANSITION FROM ROAD

RECONFIGURATION TO HYBRID
Bike lanes and travel lanes begin transition to
accommodate the hybrid concept

BUFFERED BIKE LANES

OR CYCLETRACK
on both sides of the corridor
are separated with striped
buffers, similar to W. Hedding
St. east of Pruneridge Ave.
4-LANE SECTION
2-LANE SECTION
TRANSITION:
%HJLQQLQJRIWKHWUDQVLWLRQIURPURDGZD\FRQ¿JXUDWLRQ concepts to hybrid concepts
¶%LNH/DQHVZLWK¶%XIIHULQWUDQVLWLRQ]RQH%XIIHUZLGHQV WR ¶ZKHQURDGZD\EHFRPHV&RQFHSWRU
¶&XUEWR&XUE:LGWK
¶7UDYHO/DQHV
CONCEPT 4: TRANSITION ZONES
,
I L • • 1
'··-..II :1.3.•1. ~
23 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
MID-BLOCK:
)LYH

¶ZLGHWUDYHOODQHV
Buffered bike lanes

BUFFERED BIKE LANES OR

CYCLETRACK
on both sides of the corridor are
separated with striped buffers,
similar to W. Hedding St. east of
Pruneridge Ave.

Concept 4: Mid-Block example
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
4 LANES
24 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts

EXAMPLE OF INTERSECTION
More advanced bicycle protection may be possible in the future, but will require additional coordination with the County. The example shown here is for intersection such as San Tomas, a County owned roadway

MIXING ZONE
signage and roadway
markings alert all users to
DVKDUHGWUDQVLWLRQ]RQH
near the intersection

BUFFERED BIKE LANES OR CYCLETRACK
on both sides of the corridor are separated with
striped buffers, similar to W. Hedding St. east of
Pruneridge Ave.

Concept 4 - Intersection Example
INTERSECTION:

Example Illustration of County owned intersection like San Tomas.
Intersection improvement possibilities are limited at this time. There may be opportunities to coordinate with the County on future improvements as shown on the Pedestrian Improvements Map for this location
Buffered bike lanes
6WULSLQJDQGVLJQDJHLQELNHDQGFDUPL[LQJ]RQHQHDU intersection
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
¶ELNHODQH
ZLWK¶EXIIHU
.JoMs.Jtter
&IH'tenwy _,
Intersection
•• ,
' ~ ----~
'• - -,-]!!!.. ~~s!..-:. J
25 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Corridor Transportation Analysis
The City conducted an in-depth corridor
transportation analysis along Pruneridge
$YHQXHWRJDXJHWKHH[LVWLQJDQGIXWXUHWUDɤF
RSHUDWLRQVXQGHUWKHFXUUHQWFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ
and the alternative concepts, changes to
SDUNLQJELF\FOHDQGSHGHVWULDQEHQH¿WVDQG
HQKDQFHPHQWVWRVDIHW\,QRUGHUWRJDXJHWUDɤF
impacts, the City evaluated a wide variety of
PHWULFVLQFOXGLQJWUDɤFGLYHUVLRQYHKLFOHGHOD\
corridor travel time, and vehicle miles traveled.
7KH&LW\GHYHORSHGDUREXVWWUDɤFDQDO\VLV
micro-simulation model to guide the complex
analysis. The model outputs and analysis
¿QGLQJVIURPWKHFRUULGRUWUDQVSRUWDWLRQ
DQDO\VLVKHOSHGWRLGHQWLI\SRWHQWLDOWUDGHRɣV
between concepts and are summarized below.

Each design concept was evaluated using
the following metrics. Analysis results for all
design concepts are summarized at the end of
this section. Technical Memoranda detailing
WKHVSHFL¿FPHWKRGRORJ\IRUHDFKHYDOXDWLRQ
metric are available in Appendix A.
9HKLFOH6SHHGLQJ - Vehicle speeding was
evaluated using speed survey data. The
current speed limit on Pruneridge Avenue
is 35 MPH. Potential reductions in speeding
resulting from elements of each concept
design are noted when applicable.

Safety - Safety was evaluated by reviewing
collision history along the corridor and
reviewing before and after collision data
IURPWKHURDGUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVRQRWKHU
segments of the Pruneridge/Hedding corridor.

The impacts of infrastructure changes
are noted for the conceptual designs.
9HKLFOH&RQJHVWLRQ - Based on historical and
DGMXVWHGFXUUHQWWUDɤFGDWDLQWHUVHFWLRQDQG
corridor analyses were conducted to quantify
WKHSRWHQWLDOHɣHFWVRIWKHFRQFHSWGHVLJQVRQ
vehicle delay, congestion, and vehicle miles
WUDYHOHG7KH&LW\DQDO\]HGWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
for Baseline, 2030, and 2040 conditions under
three distinct scenarios representing the project
concepts. Results for the analysis are included
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
26 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Figure 6. No Build & Concept 1 (Four Lanes) - AM & PM7UDɤF$QDO\VLV )RUWKHSXUSRVHRIWKLVVWXG\/HYHORI6HUYLFH

/26
'RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHGDFFHSWDEOH
LQWHUVHFWLRQRSHUDWLRQDQG/26(RU)LV
FRQVLGHUHGGH¿FLHQWRSHUDWLRQ+RZHYHUDW
Congestion Management Program (CMP)
intersections and intersections along
H[SUHVVZD\V/26(RUEHWWHULVFRQVLGHUHG
DFFHSWDEOHDQG/26)LVGH¿FLHQW)LJXUHV
VKRZLQJWKHRSHUDWLRQVXQGHUEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
conditions for each analysis scenario display
the results for each study intersection using
these metrics. Detailed results are provided
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU
No Build Option & Concept 1 (Four lanes)
Both the No Build Option and Concept 1
maintain the existing number of travel lanes on
Pruneridge Avenue and thus operate with the
VDPHOHYHORIFDSDFLW\DQG/26%RWKRSWLRQV
ZHUHHYDOXDWHGXVLQJEDVHOLQHWUDɤFYROXPHV
The analysis highlighted that all intersections
except the San Tomas / Pruneridge Avenue
intersection are currently operating at an
DFFHSWDEOH/26DQGZRXOGFRQWLQXHWRRSHUDWH
DWDQDFFHSWDEOH/26XQGHUERWKWKH1R
%XLOG2SWLRQDQG&RQFHSW
)RXU/DQHV

7KH&LW\HYDOXDWHGIXWXUHWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
by projecting volumes forward to 2030
and 2040 with growth factors generated
from the VTA travel demand model. This
analysis is available in Appendix A.
*Acceptable operations - A Level of Service (LOS) D or better. For CMP intersections, LOS E or better is acceptable. >
Cl.
t;j
w u z w
I
...I
EarlR
cam,,,,,,...

Porl<
: STUDYAREA - -.-............. .,, .......... .
>-0
ir
UJ
~
0 a.

CeotflJI Central
P8rl< P.,.

BENTON ST
.. ··•·.

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
- - ·~ "- '- ' J .. ~ ;..+_.._. ... ~ ;..• .. • J ... '- ' - ~ ""' ...... ..... ...... 1- •..-,J .... ... . _.J • .,.1,,,_..., .... "-'- ' J ~ .. .. ._ . ...... .. ~_ .. .., .... ---- .. - i, >
IL
>< w
(/)
.,,
No Build & Concept 1
(Four Lanes)

AM CD PM
• Acceptable
• Unacceptable
'
HEDI
FORES
• .. - -- - -
-study Co.rr1dor
Study [email protected] Boundary
• - • • City Boundar~
Parks
$Choo!
..
" .. ,,
-•"-.._ . .., .. ... ... --- ,.
27 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
&RQFHSWVDQG
7ZR/DQHV

Under Concepts 2 and 3, Pruneridge Avenue
would be converted from four lanes to two lanes
(one lane in each direction) with a center-turn
lane between Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester
Boulevard in order to accommodate dedicated
bike lanes in each direction. These concepts
would also provide two eastbound through-
lanes between San Tomas Expressway and
Saratoga Ave; turning into a right-turn only
ODQHDW6DUDWRJD$YHQXH7UDɤFDQDO\VLVUHVXOWV
IRUERWKFRQFHSWVDUHEDVHGRQEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
YROXPHVDQGLQGLFDWHWKDWWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
ZRXOGIDOOEHORZSROLF\/26DWWKHIROORZLQJ
LQWHUVHFWLRQVLQWKHSHULRGVLGHQWL¿HG
• Kiely Blvd / Pruneridge Ave - AM and PM
•T a n o a k D r / P r u n e r i d g e A v e - P M •S a n Tomas Expressway /
Pruneridge Ave - AM and PM
• Saratoga Ave / Pruneridge Ave - AM
• Cypress Ave / Pruneridge Ave - AM
7KHSURMHFWWUDɤFDQDO\VLVDOVRSURMHFWHGWUDɤF
operations out to 2030 and 2040. A growth
factor developed from Valley Transportation
$XWKRULW\¶VWUDYHOGHPDQGPRGHOKHOSHGWKH
&LW\GHYHORSDQGWUDɤFYROXPH
estimates and gauge future impacts.

Figure 7. Concepts 2 and 3 (Two Lanes) - AM & PM
*Acceptable operations - A Level of Service (LOS) D or better. For CMP intersections, LOS E or better is acceptable. ► Q.

X
w
w u z w
0::
~ _,
'
EarlR
C;,,m,c:hao/
Pstlr
: STUDYAREA
- - ~ • ~ - o. • • • 0 0 I
>-0
D::
w
::!;
0 Q.
.,
\
CeflllBI C.tttml
PtNk Park
·•
L"'#wl!IP.A
£J,,,,,,..r11
51£,;W

BENTON ST
_ .. •··• ..

Mary GCJnllJZ
PorhndPool
STEVENS CREEK BLVD - .. ·=----·-·.,,. ~ '-'_.J .... 'a ' J""' ... ...... _..,, ....... ~ ...... ,.__.,, .......... _ • .I,. .... .. . ,., ... .... _.J..,, •... ._ . .,J .... .. . _.J ... 11.-J .. ... 1... ... ► a.

X
UJ
rn
Concepts 2 and 3
(Two l anes)

AM CD PM
• Acceptable •
• Unacceptable
0 , ::,
UI
0::
w
Im
u
HEDI
FORES
,. :: .. -... _..., .... -----\ •
.. ..... • City Bounda ry
P.arh
Sct,ocl
28 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Concept 4 (Hybrid)
The hybrid concept has a combination of 4 travel
lanes and Concept 2 or 3, which results in a
better operational outcome for congestion. This
FRQFHSWDSSOLHVWKH&RQFHSWFRQ¿JXUDWLRQ
IURP3RPHUR\$YHQXHWR/XWKHU'ULYHDQG
Harold Avenue to Winchester Blvd, and
provides four travel lanes with a center-turn
ODQHEHWZHHQ*DPEOLQ'ULYHDQG6DUDWRJD
Avenue with transition zones between the
YDULRXVFRQ¿JXUDWLRQV7UDɤFDQDO\VLVUHVXOWV
IRUWKLVVFHQDULRDUHEDVHGRQEDVHOLQHWUDɤF
YROXPHVDQGLQGLFDWHWKDWWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQV
ZRXOGIDOOEHORZSROLF\/26DWWKHIROORZLQJ
LQWHUVHFWLRQVLQWKHSHULRGVLGHQWL¿HG

• Kiely Blvd / Pruneridge Ave - AM
•T a n o a k D r / P r u n e r i d g e A v e - A M • San Tomas Expressway / Pruneridge Ave - AM
7KHSURMHFWWUDɤFDQDO\VLVDOVRSURMHFWHGWUDɤF
operations out to 2030 and 2040. A growth
factor developed from Valley Transportation
$XWKRULW\¶VWUDYHOGHPDQGPRGHOKHOSHGWKH
&LW\GHYHORSDQGWUDɤFYROXPH
estimates and gauge future impacts.

Figure 8. Concept 4 (Hybrid) - AM & PM
*Acceptable operations - A Level of Service (LOS) D or better. For CMP intersections, LOS E or better is acceptable. >Q.
>< UI
UI
0 z
UI
a:
!
fodR
CofmichOBI ,,.,,
>-0 a::

UJ
:ii
0 0.
"
Central Centn,i
PatJ. Parle
·•
CNWJJIJ:',.J
o,,,,~, y
5TCAN

BENTON ST

STEVENS CREEK BLVD
,•·• ... --
>-

0. >< w
U)
~
tll
0 0
--i
--i
(!)
~
Concept 4 (Hybrid)

AMCD PM
• Acceptable•
• Unacceptable
HEDI
FORES
·------, : ,. , . ..
- - - - C1tv Boundary
Parks
~hoot
29 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
9HKLFOH'LYHUVLRQ
7UDɤFGLYHUVLRQLVDVVXPHGWRRFFXUDV
residents and visitors readjust travel patterns
ZLWKWKHUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQIURPIRXUWRWZRODQHV
(Concepts 2 and 3). The following two maps
highlight the number of vehicles diverting along
parallel street and side-streets in the study area
during the morning and evening peak hours.

In the AM peak hour (Figure 9), volumes
on Pruneridge Avenue are mainly diverting
to arterial and collector roadways such
as San Tomas Expressway, Winchester
Boulevard, Stevens Creek Boulevard,
DQG/RV3DGUHV%RXOHYDUG
The legends in Figure 9 and 10 highlight the
total number of vehicles per hour that are
DQWLFLSDWHGWRGLYHUW,W¶VLPSRUWDQWWRQRWHWKDW
orange indicates new diversion routes and blue
indicates the route vehicles diverted from.

In the PM peak hour (Figure 10), volumes on
Pruneridge decrease in the peak eastbound
direction, especially between Woodhams
Road and San Tomas Expressway. Vehicles
are diverting to the same roadways as in
the AM peak hour. While there would be
an increase in vehicles onto these other
roadways, the increased volumes do not cause
the roadways to operate over capacity.

Diversion to other local streets not mapped
may occur, but would be less than 50 per hour
during the busiest times in the day. This means
less than one new car diverting per minute. This
OHYHORIWUDɤFLVJHQHUDOO\QHJOLJLEOHDQGZLOO
not cause operational issues. A full breakdown
RIWKHDVVXPHGWUDɤFGLYHUVLRQLVLQFOXGHG
in $SSHQGL[$:RUNLQJ3DSHU.
30 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
6DQWD
&ODUD
6XQQ\YDOH
6DQ
-RVH
Pruneridge Ave
Saratoga Ave
Mauricia Ave
Lawrence Expy
Pomeroy Ave
Los Padres Blvd
Scott BlvdScott BlvdScott Blvd
N Winchester Blvd
Forbes Ave
Tanoak Dr
Kiely Blvd
San Tomas ExpwySan Tomas ExpwySan Tomas Expwy
Woodhams Rd
Homestead RdHomestead RdHomestead Rd
Benton StBenton StBenton St
Stevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek Blvd
Cronin DrCronin Dr
RedwoodRedwood
AveAve
RadcliffeRadcliffe
DrDr
Cronin Dr
Redwood
Ave
Radcliffe
Dr
Cypress Cypress
AveAve
Cypress
Ave
Monroe StMonroe StMonroe St
LEGEND
= Decrease in Traffic 50 to 100 vph
= Decrease in Traffic 100 to 200 vph
= Decrease in Traffic 200 to 300 vph
= Decrease in Traffic > 300 vph
= Increase in Traffic 50 to 100 vph
= Increase in Traffic 100 to 200 vph
= Increase in Traffic 200 to 300 vph
= Increase in Traffic > 300 vph
= City Limits
Figure 9. $07UDɤF)ORZ
%DVHOLQH

f
.----._, ,_ >
~<(
- l l ~
-----r-+-----,- --~-- ----------'--.1....-.J-~
31 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

f---+-'I~ ~ ; I I I,
32 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Table 1. Parking Utilization for removing north side parking Location # of Available
Parking
Average Cars
Estimated
Estimated
Utilization Rate
Pruneridge - North Side 00 0 %
Pruneridge - South Side 233 82 35%
Location # of Available
Parking
Average Cars
Estimated
Estimated
Utilization Rate
Pruneridge - North Side 220 83 38%
Pruneridge - South Side 00 0 %
Table 2. Parking Utilization from removing south side parking Concept VMT Reduction Today VMT Reduction 2030
No Build Option No Change No Change
Concept 1: 4 Lane Option No Change No Change
Concept 2: 2 Lane Option

0.5% reduction 0.6% reductionConcept 3: Parking Protected Option Conc
ept 4: Hybrid Option
Table 3. Vehicle Miles Traveled
3DUNLQJ8VDJH
Parking was studied along Pruneridge and
for one block on each side street (both sides).

There are 453 parking spaces on Pruneridge
Avenue. There are also an additional 539
parking spaces on side streets studied.

Analysis showed that there is adequate
parking available along the corridor and
side-streets. If parking were consolidated on
one side of the street under Concept 1, on-
street parking would be available to meet the
demand. Parking utilization rates would be
38% to 35%, should parking be removed on
the south side or north side, respectively.
9HKLFOH0LOHV7UDYHOHG
0RGLI\LQJWKHURDGZD\FRQ¿JXUDWLRQDQG
providing dedicated space for bicyclists was
evaluated for a potential impact on local Vehicle
Miles Traveled. Findings from this analysis
are included in Table 3. This analysis does not
account for potential future modal shifts out
of vehicles due to an improved walking and
bicycling network and enhanced conditions.
33 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Table 4. Corridor Travel Times (minutes)– Alternatives Comparison Concept Morning Westbound
(peak direction)
Evening Eastbound
(peak direction)
No Build Option 8.2 10.8
Concept 1: 4 Lane Option 8.2 10.8
Concept 2: 2 Lane Option 16.8 14.7
Concept 3: Parking Protected Option 16.8 14.7
Concept 4: Hybrid Option 11.5 11.5
Corridor Travel Time
The project analyzed the impact to vehicle
travel times along the corridor under baseline
conditions using simulation modeling. This
travel time is the time it would take a vehicle
to traverse Pruneridge Avenue between
Winchester Boulevard and Pomeroy Avenue.

As shown in Table 4, Concepts 2 and 3 resulted
in a notable increase in the average travel
time, especially during the morning peak hour.

Travel time in the morning takes 8.2 minutes
in the busiest direction during rush hour.

Under Concepts 2 and 3, that time is estimated
to increase 105% to 16.8 minutes. The primary
reason that the travel time doubles in the
morning westbound peak direction is the long
cycle length at San Tomas / Pruneridge, coupled
with only one through-lane in each direction
at this intersection. The project assumed green
times on Pruneridge did not increase at San
Tomas, as the County prioritizes the Expressway.

Current travel time in the evening takes

10.8 minutes in the busiest direction during
rush hour.

Under Concepts 2 and 3, that time is estimated
to increase 37% to 14.7 minutes. Due to the
increased capacity associated with Concept 4,
vehicle corridor travel times are less impacted
than under Concepts 2 and 3. Travel time
increases to 11.5 minutes in the peak direction
under both AM and PM peak periods; a 40%
and 6.5% increase in travel time respectively.
34 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Traﬃc Operations Metric Results
Vehicle Speeding
Typically, 85% of drivers travel up to 7 MPH above the 35 MPH posted speed limit.

Eastbound travel speeds are generally more consistent than westbound speeds.

Westbound between Saratoga and Winchester experienced the highest speeds, with almost 60% of vehicles traveling faster than 35 MPH.

Safety Collisions were studied between 2015 – 2021. Across all modes (vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists), 60 collisions occurred.

Vehicle Congestion No change. There is one intersection that currently operates unacceptably.

Parking Usage
$YHUDJH3DUNLQJ8VDJH
SHUFHQWRIWRWDOSDUNLQJVSDFHVRFFXSLHG

• :HHNGD\PRUQLQJV

• :HHNGD\HYHQLQJV

• :HHNGD\RYHUQLJKW

• :HHNHQG

On average, on a typical block, eight out of ten parking spaces would be available.

The overall average utilization rate on side streets is 14%. Three side streets had DQDYHUDJHXWLOL]DWLRQDERYH
ERWKVLGHVRI&UHVWYLHZDQGRQHVLGHRI-LOODQG
Burnett.

Table 5. ([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWV Design Concept
Analysis Findings
Analyses of each design concept using metrics
described above are summarized below.

Existing Conditions / No Build
7KLVLVWKHH[LVWLQJFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRQ3UXQHULGJH
Avenue between Pomeroy and Winchester, with
four vehicle travel lanes, parking on both sides
through a majority of the corridor, no bicycle
lanes, and outdated intersection designs.
35 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Traﬃc Operations Metric Results
Vehicle Speeding
Narrowing the inside travel lanes from 12 feet wide to 11 feet wide and the outside lanes from 12 feet to 10 feet may reduce speeding by 1 to 6 mph on average. 4 Safety
This concept maintains four vehicle lanes and adds bicycle lanes which provide GHGLFDWHGURDGZD\VSDFHEXWSURYLGHVOLPLWHGVDIHW\FROOLVLRQUHGXFWLRQEHQH¿WV This concept may result in an increased level of street crossings due to removed SDUNLQJRQRQHVLGHRIWKHVWUHHW,QWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQVZR XOGUHGXFHVSHHGV for turning vehicles and improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Pedestrian crossing distances at intersections would be slightly reduced, resulting in shorter crossing times.

Vehicle Congestion
No change. There would be one intersection that operates unacceptably under baseline conditions. This concept would restrict right turns on red at intersections if installed.

Parking Usage
This concept includes removing parking on one side of the street. Pruneridge Avenue and side streets have surplus parking capacity for people wishing to park on-street. Some block segments may be more heavily used, but neighboring segments and side streets have capacity. On a typical block, six out of ten parking spaces would be available.

Cost Total Estimated Cost - $6.94 Million. Pedestrian Improvements - $4.91 Million.

Bicycle Improvements - $2.02 Million.

6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVW LWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHU V

Table 6. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWVConcept 1 - Four Lanes This concept will maintain four travel lanes
DQGSURYLGHEXɣHUHGELF\FOHODQHVFXUE
extensions and high-visibility crosswalks at
select intersections. Parking would be eliminated
on one side of the street under this concept.
36 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Traﬃc Operations Metric Results
Vehicle Speeding
Converting four lanes to two lanes and narrowing travel lane width as included in Concepts 2 and 3 may reduce speeding by 3-6 mph on average. 5 Road UHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVIURPIRXUODQHVWRWZRODQHVDOVRUHGXFHWKHVS HHGGLɣHUHQFH between vehicles, since vehicles that want to exceed the speed limit cannot pass drivers obeying the speed limit.
5 Safety
/DQHUHGXFWLRQDQGUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQKDVWKHSRWHQWLDOWRUHGXFHF ROOLVLRQVE\
47%67KHURDGUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQZRXOGFUHDWHDFRQVLVWHQWURDGZD\FRQ ¿JXUDWLRQ across the corridor while slowing vehicle speed and reducing collision risk and VHYHULW\,QWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQVZRXOGUHGXFHVSHHGVIRUWXU QLQJYHKLFOHV and improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Pedestrian crossing distances at intersections would be slightly reduced, resulting in shorter crossing times. 3DLQWHGEXɣHUVDWGULYHZD\VLPSURYHVLJKWGLVWDQFHVDQGLQFUHDV HYLVLELOLW\IRU both vehicles and bicyclists.

Vehicle Congestion
Five intersections would operate unacceptably under baseline conditions. In addition, up to eight minutes would be added to the westbound direction of travel during the AM peak hour. It should be noted that diversion is not expected to increase congestion or cause level of service impacts to other streets. If installed, this concept would restrict right turns on red for vehicles.

Parking Usage /LPLWHGSDUNLQJUHPRYDOQHDUGULYHZD\VWRLQFUHDVHYLVLELOLW\ 2QDW\SLFDOEORFN eight out of ten parking spaces would be available.

Cost Total Estimated Costs - $7.22 Million. Pedestrian Improvements - $4.91 Million.

Bicycle Improvements - $2.30 Million
6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVWL WXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHUV

(YDOXDWLRQRI/DQH5HGXFWLRQ´5RDG'LHW³0HDVXUHVRQ&UDVKHV )+:$+57

Table 7. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWV Concept 2 - Two Lanes
This concept provides two travel lanes and a
center-turn lane with parking on both sides of
WKHVWUHHWEXɣHUHGELNHODQHVFDQRS\WUHHVDQG
curb-extensions and high-visibility crosswalks
at selection intersections. It is important to
note that this concept includes two eastbound
through lanes between San Tomas and
Saratoga, with the outermost lane becoming a
right-turn lane at the Saratoga intersection.
37 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Traﬃc Operations Metric Results
Vehicle Speeding
Converting four lanes to two lanes and narrowing travel lane width as included in Concepts 2 and 3 may reduce speeding by 3-6 mph on average. 7 Road UHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQVIURPIRXUODQHVWRWZRODQHVDOVRUHGXFHWKHVS HHGGLɣHUHQFH between vehicles, since vehicles that want to exceed the speed limit cannot pass GULYHUVREH\LQJWKHVSHHGOLPLW7KLVFRQFHSWKHOSVSURPRWHWUD ɤFFDOPLQJE\ placing objects (vehicles) closer to the travel lane, which creates a visually smaller travel way and may result in additional speed reductions. 8 Safety
/DQHUHGXFWLRQVUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQDQGELF\FOHSURWHFWLRQKDYHWKHSRWHQWLDOWR reduce collisions by 19-47%
9)+:$LVFXUUHQWO\VWXG\LQJVDIHW\EHQH¿WVIURP
separated facilities, which are likely to be higher due to the physical separation of vulnerable road users (to be completed in Fall 2022). The center-turn lane would LPSURYHGULYHZD\WXUQLQJDQGUHGXFHFROOLVLRQFRQÀLFWSRLQWVIR USHRSOHWXUQLQJ 3DLQWHGEXɣHUVDWGULYHZD\VLPSURYHVLJKWGLVWDQFHVDQGLQFUHDV HYLVLELOLW\IRU ERWKYHKLFOHVDQGELF\FOLVWV,QWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQVZRXOGU HGXFHVSHHGVIRU turning vehicles and improve pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

Parking Usage /LPLWHGSDUNLQJUHPRYDOQHDUGULYHZD\VWRLQFUHDVHYLVLELOLW\ 2QDW\SLFDOEORFN eight out of ten parking spaces would be available.

Cost 7RWDO(VWLPDWHG&RVWV

0LOOLRQ3HGHVWULDQ,PSURYHPHQWV
0LOOLRQ
Bicycle Improvements - $3.37 Million. 6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVWL WXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHUV

.QDSS.7:HOFK-:LWPHU&RQYHUWLQJ)RXU/DQH8QGLYLGH G5RDGZD\VWRD7KUHH/DQH&URVV6HFWLRQ )DFWRUVWR&RQVLGHU

(YDOXDWLRQRI/DQH5HGXFWLRQ´5RDG'LHW³0HDVXUHVRQ&UDVKHV )+:$+57

Table 8. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWVConcept 3 - Parking Protected Separated Bikeway
Similar to Concept 2, this concept also
provides two travel lanes, a center-turn lane,
parking on both sides of the road, canopy
trees, and curb-extensions and high-visibility
crosswalks at select intersections. This concept
also includes two eastbound through-lanes
between San Tomas and Saratoga, with the
outermost lane becoming a right-turn lane at
WKH6DUDWRJDLQWHUVHFWLRQ7KHNH\GLɣHUHQFH
between Concepts 2 and 3 is an exchange
between the bicycle lane and the parking to
FUHDWHDµSDUNLQJSURWHFWHG¶ELNHODQHZKLFKLV
physically separated from moving vehicles. This
protection would extend to the intersections,
providing a protected intersection for bicyclists
and pedestrians. At full implementation, this
FRQFHSWZRXOGUHTXLUHPRGL¿FDWLRQRIVLJQDO
timings and incorporation of pedestrian and
bicycle intervals and bicycle signal heads.
38 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Traﬃc Operations Metric Results
Vehicle Speeding
Narrowing vehicle travel lanes to ten feet will help reduce vehicle speeding by narrowing the visual appearance of the roadway. This may result in a reduction of average vehicle speeds between 3-6 mph.
9 Modifying the total number of lanes
to two will help to reduce excessive speeding as vehicles looking to speed will be unable to pass vehicles traveling at a reasonable speed. Additionally, the presence of on-street parking may help to reduce vehicle speeds, as the visual width of the roadway will appear more restricted than without the presence of parked vehicles.

Safety
Reducing the total number of lanes from four to two will reduce the total number RISRWHQWLDOFRQÀLFWSRLQWVEHWZHHQYHKLFOHVDVOHIWWXUQLQJYH KLFOHVDUHUHPRYHG IURPWKHÀRZRIWUDɤF7KHFRPELQDWLRQRIODQHUHGXFWLRQVUHFR Q¿JXUDWLRQ and bicycle protection has the potential to reduce collisions by up to 47%. 10 7KLVFRQFHSWZRXOGH[SHULHQFHVLPLODUVDIHW\EHQH¿WVWR&RQFHSWVDQGLQWKH sections where that design is applied. This includes improved sight distances, increased visibility for both vehicles and bicyclists, and reduced vehicle speeds WKURXJKLQWHUVHFWLRQPRGL¿FDWLRQV7KH)+:$LVFXUUHQWO\VWXG\L QJWKHDGGLWLRQDO VDIHW\EHQH¿WVRIVHSDUDWHGELF\FOHIDFLOLWLHVEH\RQGWUDGLWLRQ DO&ODVV,,ELNHODQHV Vehicle Congestion
This concept maintains vehicle capacity in the busiest section of the study area. 7KLVPDLQWDLQVDKLJKHUOHYHORIWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVWKDQFRXOGEH DFKLHYHGWKURXJK Concepts 2 or 3. Three intersections would operate at unacceptable levels of service during the AM peak period under baseline conditions. Additionally, travel WLPHVXQGHUEDVHOLQHFRQGLWLRQVLQWKLVWUDɤFVFHQDULRZRXOGEH PLQXWHVLQ the peak AM and PM periods in the corresponding peak directions. This accounts for an additional 3.3 minutes in the AM and additional 0.7 minutes in the PM peak period. It should be noted that diversion is not expected to increase congestion or cause level of service impacts to other streets.

Parking Usage
This concept results in minimal parking removal around driveways and an additional seven parking spaces would need to be removed on the south side of Pruneridge Avenue east of Saratoga Avenue. This would provide a similar level of parking with eight out of ten parking spaces available on a typical block.

Cost TBD

6NHQH0LFKDHO³µ7UDɤF&DOPLQJ¶2Q$UWHULDO5RDGZD\V"´,QVW LWXWHRI7UDQVSRUWDWLRQ(QJLQHHUV&RPSHQGLXPRI7HFKQLFDO3DSHU V

.QDSS.7:HOFK-:LWPHU&RQYHUWLQJ)RXU/DQH8QGLYL GHG5RDGZD\VWRD7KUHH/DQH&URVV6HFWLRQ )DFWRUVWR&RQVLGHU

Table 9. &RQFHSW7UDɤF2SHUDWLRQV0HWULFVDQG5HVXOWV Concept 4 - Hybrid Option
This concept represents a blend of 4 travel
lanes and Concept 2 or 3. This concept
LQFOXGHVWZRGLVWLQFWGHVLJQYDULDWLRQV

• :LWK%XɣHUHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW
RU
• :LWK3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG%LNH/DQHV
&RQFHSW

7KHURDGZRXOGEHUHFRQ¿JXUHGWRKDYHWZR
travel lanes and a center turn lane from Pomeroy
$YHQXHWR/XWKHU'ULYHDQGIURP+DUROG$YHQXH
to Winchester Boulevard. The roadway would
transition to a four lane section with a center
WXUQODQHEHWZHHQ/XWKHUDQG*DPEOLQ'ULYH
DQGPDLQWDLQWKLVFRQ¿JXUDWLRQWKURXJK+DUROG
Avenue. Preserving vehicle capacity at the critical
intersections of San Tomas Expressway and
Saratoga Boulevard maintains a higher level
RIWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQVWKDQZRXOGEHSRVVLEOH
with Concepts 2 or 3. This concept includes
many of the major improvements and design
concepts from Concepts 2 and 3, such as parking
on both sides of the road, canopy trees, curb
extensions, and high-visibility crosswalks at
selected intersections. This concept integrates
GHVLJQDQGWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQFRQVLGHUDWLRQV
from partner agencies. This concept may
UHTXLUHVLJQDOPRGL¿FDWLRQWRLQFRUSRUDWH
pedestrian and bicycle intervals and bicycle
signal heads if the parking protected bike
lane design variation is ultimately selected.
39 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
3HGHVWULDQ,PSURYHPHQWV
:KLOHWKHUHFRQ¿JXUDWLRQRIURDGZD\VSDFH
between the curbs in Concepts 1, 2, and 3 may
require additional consideration, improvements
to pedestrian safety along the corridor can
be implemented with little to no impact while
SURYLGLQJDVXEVWDQWLDODQGLPPHGLDWHEHQH¿W
WRORFDOUHVLGHQWV7KH&LW\WHDPLGHQWL¿HG
intersections along the corridor to provide
low-cost pedestrian safety improvements
as shown below. These include enhanced
pedestrian crossing markings, improved right-
turn slip lanes, and pedestrian countdown
timers / Accessible Pedestrian Signals.
40 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Tool Name Icon Example Description
Pedestrian Crossing Sign
$OHUWPRWRULVWVWRWKHSUHVHQFHRIDPDUNHGFURVVZDONZLWKRXWD WUDɤF signal. They can be placed parallel to or in advance of a crosswalk, and are particularly useful in locations where a crosswalk may not be expected by motorists.
6WDQGDUG&URVVZDON
0DUNLQJ
Use marking patterns of two parallel lines to increase yielding behavior and deter encroachment into the crosswalk.
$GYDQFH<LHOG6WRS/LQHV
These inform motorists of the correct position to wait for pedestrians at marked crossings. They are used in advance of stop signs or signalized crossings.
$'$&XUE5DPS
Provide a transition between the sidewalk and roadway crossings. They provide universal access for all users including pedestrians using wheeled mobility devices, small children, adults pushing strollers, and people with luggage.

Figure 11. Pedestrian Crossing Improvement Tools
9LVXDO/HJHQGIRU,PSURYHPHQWV
The following pedestrian recommendations
ZHUHVHOHFWHGXVLQJWKHWRROVLGHQWL¿HGLQ6DQWD
Clara's Pedestrian Master Plan. This visual
glossary shows the icons that represent the
UHFRPPHQGDWLRQVLGHQWL¿HGDWLQWHUVHFWLRQV
on the following pages. The glossary includes
an example image and short description.
41 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Tool Name Icon Example Description
Curb Radius Reduction
Are extensions of the sidewalk and curb at the corners of intersections.

They shorten the roadway crossing distance and result in cars turning more slowly.
,PSURYHG5LJKW7XUQ6OLS
/DQH
Shortening the turn radius, requiring vehicles to turn more slowly, or removing slip lane entirely. Might include installing pedestrian refuge islands and marked pedestrian crossings so that people are clearly visible to oncoming drivers.

Countdown Timer /
Accessible Pedestrian
6LJQDOV
$36

Countdown timers indicate pedestrian walk phase and remaining time to cross at signalized intersections. APS devices communicate information DERXWWKH:$/.DQG'21¶7:$/.LQWHUYDOVLQQRQYLVXDOIRUPDWV WR pedestrians who are visually impaired or have low vision. 7UDɤF6WXG\
Collect 8-hours of vehicle counts, pedestrian crossings, and travel speeds and determine if stop signs, signals or beacons should be installed with marked crosswalks.
42 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Curb Radius
Reduction
Timer
X2
X
X2
Extension
Standard
Crosswalk
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
X
Standard
Crosswalk
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
X4
Curb Radius
Reduction
ADA
Pedestrian
Signal
X8
Countdown Leading Pedestrian
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X3
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
Standard
Crosswalk
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
X
Curb Radius
Reduction
Curb Radius
Reduction
Recommend
Traffic Study
X6
Countdown
Timer
Timer
Pomeroy Avenue
Cronin Drive
Burnett Avenue
Hayes Avenue
Woodhams Road
Redwood Avenue
Cedar Way
X2
X2
X
C
bR d i
X
C
bR d iADA
Curb Ramp
X4
Pomeroy Avenue
Cronin Drive
e u n e v A t t e n r u B
e u n e v A s e y a H
d a o R s m a h d o o W
Redwood Avenue
y a W r a d e C
5 6 7
1 2
3 4
Eisenhower Elementary School
Maywood Park
Figure 12. Pruneridge Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Map – Segment 1 .J
a
0 0
0 0
43 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Kiely Boulevard
Luther Drive
Tanoak Drive
San Tomas Expy
Saratoga Avenue
X4
Curb Radius
Reduction
X8
Countdown
Timer
X4
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
Improved
Right-Turn Slip Lane
X16
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
Advance Yield/
Stop Lines
X8
Countdown
Timer
X4
Pedestrian
Crossing Sign
X2
Improved
Right-Turn Slip Lane
X2
Advance Yield/
Stop Lines
X8
Countdown
Timer
X2
Pedestrian
Crossing Sign
X2 X2
Cb Rd i
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d iStandard
Crosswalk
Standard
Crosswalk
Kiely Boulevard
Luther Drive
Tanoak Drive
San Tomas Expy
Saratoga Avenue8 9 10 11 12
Requires
coordination
with Santa
Clara County
Figure 13. Pruneridge Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Map – Segment 2 ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ i, @
"
@
-- -- -- - -- Ci) @ Ci) @ @w @ w - -- -- -- -@
-
ao 0 0 ao a
44 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

03. Potential Corridor Alternative Concepts
Harold Avenue
Cypress Avenue
Kerry Drive
Henry Avenue/Los Padres Boulevard
Jill Avenue
Winchester Boulevard
ADA
Curb Ramp
X8
Countdown
Timer
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
ADA
Curb Ramp
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2
Improved
Right-Turn Slip Lane
X8
Countdown
Timer
ADA
Curb Ramp
X2X2
ADA
Curb Ramp
X4
X2 X2
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb Rd i
Standard
Crosswalk
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb Rd i
Standard
Crosswalk
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb Rd i
Recommend
Traffic Study
X2
Advance
Stop Lines
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i
Standard
Crosswalk
X2
Curb Radius
Reduction
X
Cb R d i
Harold Avenue
Cypress Avenue
Kerry Drive
Henry Avenue
Jill Avenue
Winchester Blvd
Los Padres Blvd
Sutter Avenue
13 14 15 16 17 18
Requires
coordination
with San Jose
Requires
coordination
with San Jose
Requires
coordination
with San Jose
Figure 14. Pruneridge Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Map – Segment 3 ~
.
~ ~ (f) ~ (f) ®
~
~ ~
" - - - - - - -- - -®) § ®) § § ®) §
-- - -- - - - - -
0 a 0 0 a
Community
Engagement

04. Due to COVID-19 restrictions, most public outreach and engagement was conducted virtually, which allowed
for continued engagement with the community while
promoting public health and safety. This allowed the
project to continue moving forward during shelter-in-place orders and resulted in a higher level of engagement than typically received with in-person focused engagement.
46 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Engagement Strategies
3URMHFW:HEVLWH
The City of Santa Clara hosted the project
website for the Plan and provided information
about the project throughout the life of the study.

This website was a key landing page for residents
looking for project information, including project
documents, public event details, and recordings
of public workshops. The website also provided
an opportunity to submit feedback directly to
the project throughout the life of the project,
including through online surveys. The project
website was launched in December 2020.
(www.SantaClaraCA.gov/PruneridgeAvePlan)
f•Of\tflull'l.a~ , -~t;l'l-lloDllb->'tlal , 'h-.~~W,,[JJ'll)IIAIII~ l,.~,1.i, ,,,.~ .. l.f,-ru,,u, ,.-r.a1 •, I~ • ~1l1JeCt'1't,11:!riai.1Clai• Q, •• -•• ,,..,r,• ,.,_
SE:R\IICES OUR CITY RE:CRE:ATION & COMMUNITY BUSINESS & Dl:VELOPMENT I WANT TO r,.urti, ~''II"_.
l)ufq•VT~
r,;ir><.p'.JfUhonAJcJ#f ,~Pallo,
IJJ,>dal"
l'l•1Lh,...,...,.lkrul,,v.i,<1[1a._.
1 ..... r>ru,.-<'!
Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Plan
Online Community Meetings #5 and /If;
Plea!< /of\"''°' tt,e laot """1d<>4_,."""""""'Y.,.._ lor111< """""""10A...,,.,.,Compic"' s ... to Plan lhmtt meeUngs Will preserd. lhe '""'bed canccP' plans ror ,mprovtt.g Wo1tkirlg and bicycling alOng P,ui,erldge-A.weptJe bl!!weei ~y A...enue iind Wlndlester Boule\r.a.rd ~,ed on connw.mlty IRput mld commen~ .-ecer.,eci t,om u,e onlnl! ~rvey ~ pi ans lf'CIUcle opll0fl$ lof rermi.Jig p:u11,1og 131~ ~S'. 01 lo ratain emttng tane:.. In adi:itlori. the rcsllll.3 ol l.ho tramc. 1mpac'.s ror all tt.c COt"l&t'p(5 WtN be shared V!lilrt ttie commu111ty, Flnal y, au~ Will be .&.N to saea: bie. prefer~ b eadi concepl :htough a~lmtd'lclJonwltr
47 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Stevens Creek Blvd
Winchester Blvd
San Tomas Expwy
Lawrence Expwy
Pruneridge Avenue
Pomeroy Ave
Homestead Rd
Los Padres Blvd
Forbes Ave
Hedding
St Interstate 880
Interstate 280
Apple
Campus
Valley
Fair
Monroe St
Agilent
Campus
Kaiser
Hospital
La Herran
Dr
Calabazas Creek
Saratoga Ave
Newhall St
Scott Blvd
Bellomy St
Market St
Int
ers
t
Apple
Campus
Calabazas C
C
Project corridor
Notification flyer boundary
City of San Jose
City of Cupertino
LEGEND
Map 5. 0DLOHU1RWL¿FDWLRQ%RXQGDULHVCommunity Survey
The project included an online community
survey intended to gather feedback and
input from the public to identify barriers and
recommendations for multimodal improvements
along the corridor. The City team sent a total
of 23,238 notices to UHVLGHQWVZLWKLQ
½ mile of the corridor (as shown in Map
5) in order to generate feedback directly from
local residents and those who use the corridor
most frequently for each round of outreach. The
online survey was available from 2/12/2021 to
5/8/2021 and generated 678 responses. Two
additional online surveys were created to gather
FRPPXQLW\IHHGEDFNVSHFL¿FDOO\RQWKHGUDIW
and revised corridor concepts. The second online
survey sought feedback on the draft corridor
concepts. The second survey was available
between September 2021 and January 2022. The
survey received 352 responses. The third survey
asked respondents to prioritize their preferences
on the revised corridor concepts. This survey
had a total of 144 completed responses. The
survey ran from February 2022 - March 2022
and was re-issued on May 23, 2022 and ran
through June 28, 2022 to gather additional
public feedback. This additional survey captured
188 total responses. A full analysis of the
survey results is available in Appendix B.

I=
48 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
6WDNHKROGHU,QWHUYLHZV
The City team conducted multiple interviews
with a diverse group of stakeholders to
understand their mobility needs along the
corridor. Each meeting helped the City team
identify known issues and opportunities
along the corridor as well as the diverse needs
of project stakeholders. Interviews were
FRQGXFWHGZLWKWKHIROORZLQJVWDNHKROGHUV

•O l d Q u a d R e s i d e n t s A s s o c i a t i o n - March 29, 2021
• Apple - March 29, 2021
• Santa Clara County Public Health
Department (SCCPHD) - April 1, 2021
•S i l i c o n V a l l e y B i c y c l e C o a l i t i o n (SVBC) - April 1, 2021
• 6DQWD&ODUD8QL¿HG6FKRRO'LVWULFW
CUSD - April 21, 2021
6WDNHKROGHULQWHUYLHZVXPPDULHV
Santa Clara Uniﬁed School District (CUSD)
3UXQHULGJH$YHQXHGRHVQRWKDYHDVLJQL¿FDQW
number of students crossing for school purposes
because this road acts as a boundary for
(LVHQKRZHU(OHPHQWDU\VFKRRO&86'VWDɣ
was supportive of additional bicycle facilities
and improved safety on routes to school.

The Old Quad Residents Association
This association represents residents of
WKHµ2OG4XDG¶QHLJKERUKRRGLQWKHKHDUW
of the City of Santa Clara. In general,
this group was supportive of increased
multimodal connections into downtown
Santa Clara and providing an east-west
bicycle facility south of Homestead Road.

Santa Clara County Public Health
Department (SCCPHD)
6WDɣIURPWKH6&&3+'ZHUHVXSSRUWLYHRI
safety improvements and creating comfortable
alternative transportation facilities to encourage
PRUHELF\FOLQJDQGZDONLQJ6&&3+'VWDɣ
highlighted the need for improved crossings
for children, seniors, disabled individuals,
and those who otherwise can not drive.

Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition (SVBC)
7KH69%&LVDQRQSUR¿WRUJDQL]DWLRQIRFXVHG
on promoting and expanding the bicycle network
in San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties. SVBC
representatives expressed strong support for
creating protected bicycle facilities, expanding
the bicycle network, and implementing complete
streets strategies along Pruneridge Avenue.

Apple
$SSOHVWDɣVXSSRUWHGSURYLGLQJFRPIRUWDEOH
bicycle facilities along Pruneridge in order to
increase employee bicycle mode share and create
DVWURQJHDVWZHVWFRQQHFWLRQ6WDɣH[SUHVVHGD
desire for Pruneridge Avenue to connect to north/
south facilities and the larger bicycle network.
49 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Concept 2:

Two Lane Option 1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
Concept 4:

Hybrid Option
Concept 3:

Protected Bikeway Option
Concept 1:

Four Lane Option
No build:
existing conditions
Figure 15. BPAC Concept Preferences
The BPAC ranked their
preference of all
concepts presented,
results are highlighted
in Figure 15. The BPAC
showed a strong
SUHIHUHQFHIRUEXɣHUHG
bike lanes and a
continuous bicycle
facility.

Committee/Commission
DQG&RXQFLO0HHWLQJV
The City team met with the following
Committee/Commissions and the City
Council to provide project updates and
receive feedback and direction. In general,
Committee/Commission members participated
in online poll questions, asked clarifying
questions about the concept designs, and
provided verbal feedback. Meeting dates and
content provided are summarized below.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee (BPAC)
• 0DUFK - Alta presented during the
regularly scheduled March 22, 2021 BPAC
meeting. The purpose of this meeting
was to provide project information and
gather feedback on existing conditions
and known issues on the corridor.
• $XJXVW - Alta presented as part of a
regularly scheduled August 23, 2021 BPAC
meeting. At this meeting, the draft concepts
were presented to them and general comments
received focused on making the corridor
consistent with either end and enhancing
bicycle and pedestrian visibility at driveways
and throughout the design. Concept 2
received the highest level of support from the
&RPPLVVLRQ
IXOO\VXSSRUWHG&RQFHSW
2 and 38% supported with minor changes.
• -DQXDU\ - Alta presented to the BPAC
during the regular meeting on January 24,
2022. Alta presented a project overview and
updates as well as updated design concepts
based on previous public input. BPAC
members voted on updated project concepts
and provided general comments. Comments
focused on design considerations (trash can
pick-up locations, driveway visibility, etc.)
and ensuring that the movements of people
biking are predictable and visible for all
concepts. Concept 3 was ranked as the most
preferred concept by the Committee. See
image below for the full BPAC ranking.
• 0DUFK&LW\VWDɣSUHVHQWHGWR
the BPAC during the regular meeting on
0DUFK6WDɣVKDUHG&LW\&RXQFLO
comments provided at the March 8,
2022 Council meeting study session and
obtained additional BPAC feedback.
-
50 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
• 0D\ - Alta presented at a specially
held BPAC meeting on May 11, 2022. Alta
provided the Committee with information
about the most recent revisions to the
analysis based on public comments and
the newly developed Concept 4 Hybrid
Option. The Committee members provided
feedback on the revised analysis and hybrid
option. Ultimately the preferred option
VHOHFWHGE\%3$&ZDV&RQFHSW
7ZR/DQH
Option with Concept 4 ranking second.
• -XQH%3$&PHHWLQJ - Alta
presented the draft Pruneridge Complete
Streets Plan to the BPAC during the regular
meeting on June 27, 2022. The Committee
received a presentation on the plan and
design concepts. Following the presentation,
BPAC took an action to recommend that the
City Council adopt the Pruneridge Avenue
Complete Streets Plan and recommended
that the Council adopt Concept 4 with
WKHEXɣHUHGELNHODQHV
&RQFHSW

51 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Parks and Recreation Commission
Alta presented as part of a regularly scheduled
Parks & Recreation Commission meeting
RQ6HSWHPEHU*HQHUDOFRPPHQWV
included questions about the impact of designs
DQGSRWHQWLDOIRUFXWWKURXJKWUDɤFRQVLGH
streets. Concept 2 received the highest support
from the Commission with 60% voting in full
support or support with minor changes.

Youth Commission
Alta presented as part of a regularly scheduled
Youth Commission meeting on September
14, 2021. The Commission provided feedback
on the designs and were generally in
IDYRURI&RQFHSWDQG&RQFHSW*HQHUDO
comments included questions about next
steps and timeline for construction.

City Council Study Session
The City Council was presented with information
regarding the project on March 8, 2022. This
study session included an overview of the project
and what was completed to date. The Council
study session was informational in nature and
intended to provide Councilmembers with a
full review of technical analysis completed for
the design concepts. Councilmembers asked
questions and provided feedback regarding
VKRUWDQGORQJWHUPWUDɤFRSHUDWLRQDODQG
safety concerns as well as potential options for
implementation. The Council also heard public
comments on the project which were in favor of
PRUHWUDɤFFDOPLQJDQGDVLQJOHODQHDORQJZLWK
a general concern regarding potential congestion.
3RSXS(YHQWV
The City team conducted two pop-up style events
during the project. These events provided an
opportunity to meet residents where they are
and generate additional project feedback and
awareness of the project. Both pop-up events
included information booths with a welcome
board that provided an overview of the project
and a QR code linked to the project website.

Each of the four corridor alternatives (including
existing) had a board, and visitors could walk
52 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
around the booth and receive an explanation
RIHDFKFRQFHSWDQGWKHGLɣHUHQFHVEHWZHHQ
them. Residents then had the opportunity to
vote for which alternative was their preference.
iPads were also available for residents to
take the Concept Alternative Survey.

Celebrate Santa Clara - August 21, 2021
Celebrate Santa Clara was an outdoor
community event held in Santa Clara Central
Park with food, entertainment, and booths from
local organizations and City departments. The
Public Works Department hosted a booth for
the Pruneridge Avenue Complete Street Study.

The City team interacted with 45 residents
during the afternoon. Concepts 2 and 3 received
the most support from residents who voted
on the concept designs during the event.

Christmas Tree Lighting - December 3, 2021
This outdoor event featured performances
from local groups, food, pictures with Santa, a
snow park, and booths from local organizations
and City departments. The Public Works
Department hosted a booth for the Pruneridge
Avenue Complete Streets Study which provided
a welcome board, sign-in sheet, comment
cards, and project information virtually
and through paper handouts. The City team
interacted with approximately 86 residents
during the event. Concept 3 received the most
support from residents during the event.
53 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
&RPPXQLW\:RUNVKRSV
Community workshops provide an opportunity
to meet directly with residents to provide
information, identify existing issues, and gather
feedback on project concepts. The project
included three distinct phases of workshops
with two workshops at various times to allow
for increased participation. One workshop was
held on a weekday evening and one workshop
was held on a Saturday afternoon. Information
shared at each workshop was the same for each
round. Community workshops were promoted
through postcards mailed to 7,746 mailing
addresses within ½ mile of the corridor for
each of the three rounds (23,238 total notices
mailed); social media posts from the City,
stakeholders, and community partners; the City
0DQDJHU¶V%ORJ
DQGWKHSURMHFWZHEVLWHZKLFK
included a link for registration to the community
workshops. Meeting dates, times, and general
WKHPHVIRUHDFKURXQGDUHLGHQWL¿HGEHORZVHH
Appendix CWRYLHZSRVWFDUGQRWL¿FDWLRQV
sign-in sheets, and materials provided.

Phase 1 - Workshops 1 & 2
Participants in Phase 1 workshops received
information about the project and were
provided with an opportunity to voice concerns
and issues experienced along the corridor.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 92 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 7pm on
February 25th, 2021. There were a total
of 90 comments provided through chat
or video conference at the meeting.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 28 participants
who submitted 40 comments and suggestions
through the chat or video conference
meeting functions. This meeting occurred
at 1 pm on February 27, 2021 on Zoom.

Phase 2 - Workshops 3 & 4
Phase 2 workshops included initial
conceptual designs for Concept 1, 2, and

3. Attendees were provided with existing
condition data about the corridor and
given an overview of the draft conceptual
designs. Participants were asked to rank the
conceptual designs and provide feedback.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 62 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 6pm
on July 22, 2021. There were a total of 103
comments made by residents through the
Zoom chat and video conference functions.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 17 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 1pm
on July 24, 2021. There were a total of
31 comments received at this meeting
through the chat and video conference.

Phase 3 - Workshops 5, 6 & 7
3KDVHZRUNVKRSVIRFXVHGRQUH¿QLQJWKH
conceptual designs by gathering feedback
from the community. Workshops 5 and
SURYLGHGSDUWLFLSDQWVZLWK¿QDOGHVLJQ
concepts and the technical analysis related
to Concepts 1, 2, and 3. Concept 4 was
introduced to the public at Workshop 7.
• :RUNVKRShad a total of 61 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 6pm
on February 9, 2022. There were a total
of 80 comments provided through chat
or video conference at the meeting.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 20 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 1pm on
Saturday, February 12, 2022. There was
a total of 25 comments provided through
chat or video conference at the meeting.
• :RUNVKRS had a total of 44 participants
and was held virtually on Zoom at 6pm on
May 12, 2022. Participants provided a total
of 40 comments and suggestions through
the chat or video conference functions.

Tt1emn
• Calm.st:raffic-sp,L"!th. I
• lmpr,;1\-.:f to11Jklnic c(mJkiom1 ,..!",._!.._..,.
• lrnprv~bli:1 ·d1:bptiu11J1 • ~ :•~~ ~
• Pre$ci'\'el on -11trl!ll:I ri:u-ldr1g
54 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Additional Outreach Strategies
In addition to the engagement events detailed
above, the City team also used a combination
of promotional strategies to increase awareness
of and participation with the Plan. Events,
surveys, and other items were promoted using
WKHSURMHFWZHEVLWHWKH&LW\0DQDJHU¶V%ORJ
social media posts on Facebook, Nextdoor, and
Twitter, and “Inside Santa Clara” articles. The
City provided a dedicated phone number and
email address for the project. The City also
emailed everyone who signed up to receive
QRWL¿FDWLRQVDERXWWKHSURMHFWHYHU\WLPHQHZ
information or materials were posted on the
project website including meeting details.

The City also posted 20 street signs along the
corridor to direct people to the project website.

SPEED
LIM IT
35 55 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Figure 16. Workshop 1 & 2 - Pruneridge Destination Results3KDVH2XWUHDFK6XPPDU\)LQGLQJV Travel trends / preferences summary
The City team asked respondents about their
typical destinations when traveling along
Pruneridge Avenue and developed a word cloud
from the responses. The size of each word
indicates the frequency it was used with the
largest words below being used most often by
respondents. The most common responses
were traveling to and from home and work.

In order to gain a deeper understanding of how
Pruneridge Avenue is used and what destinations
the road provides access to, residents were
asked to identify their top locations that they
use Pruneridge Avenue to access. The combined
feedback from both Phase 1 workshops are
shown in Figure 16 and 17. Many of the responses
came from local residents and those who work
LQWKHDUHD7KHPRVWFRPPRQO\LGHQWL¿HG
phrases were “Home”, “Work”, and “Everywhere”.

Based on this feedback, it is apparent that
Pruneridge Avenue serves many purposes
for the local community and will continue to
support these uses now and in the future.

Home
Work
shopping
walk
Everywhere
lawrence
school
Commute
exercise
Bike
Library
Park
Kaiser
Parks
Luckys
freeway
280
cupertino
Lucky
GuadalupeTrail
Airportcommunity
Highways
biking
Transit
errands
restaurants
Store
Apple
Church
Kiely
trail
Friends
doctors
Mall
Skeletons
Hospital
Sunnyvale
San Tomas
travel to work
Downtown San JoseSan Jose
Valley fair
Grocery store
Grocery and gas station
Lawrence. Car.
kaiser 880 101 downtown work s
China Delight
walking to local parks
Get to San Tomas
Luckys market, Carl's Jr, Chin
To SJC
to get to the bascom interchan
shopping excerise
To freeway
Elderly parents home daily and
Shoping and exercise.
neighborhood walk, go to Santa
Home. Visit family get out of
access to expressways
biking to bike trails
To Lawrence. To commute to Mt
Bike to work
home, library, shopping, park
Home work family
Home and forest park cabana cl
Fire station
Rose Garden or Santana Row
Santana row
freeway interchange at Bascom
work, grocery, walk,
Lawrence SanTomas
Caltrain station
Swim club and home
store, work, shopping
Love on ot
home, work, everywhere
Office Daycare
To San Jose downtown
Grave yard
Lawrence expressway
walking for exercise
Access freeway
Post office
Lawrence expressway to Lynbroo
San Tomas Aquino trail
biking for exercise
Avoid stevens creek
Dad house
visit friends
ice rink Cupertino
live on the street
visiting relatives
Laurence expressway
Home school work shopping
Exercise ...workLive on Pruneridge Shopping Santana row home work shopping
Kaiser Santa Clara
56 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Figure 17. Workshop 1 and 2 - Visioning Results
Cal slow down
tra ic speeds 1st
2nd
3rd
4th
5th
educe tra ic
congestion
pro e
bicycling options
pro e walking
conditions
Preser e on street
parking
Figure 18. What should Pruneridge’s priorities be? (ranking)Community priorities summary The community ranked their priorities for the
FRUULGRUDQGLGHQWL¿HGFDOPLQJWUDɤFVSHHGV
as their top priority, as shown to the right.

Bike
community
Biking
safe
Bike lanesParking
4 lanes
unchangedresidential
quiet
bikelanes
slower
safe bike lanes Cars
Calm4-lanes
Slower traffic
slowMore lanes
green
safer
Less traffic
Bike-friendly
diet-lanes
2 lanes
matching across valley
Reduced speed
green bike lanes
More traffic
Not congested Toll road
Equitable
Pedestrian safety
as-is
modern
unchanged!!
2-lanes
Keep 4 lanes
not the main way into apple
Yes, unchanged.
resident parking
livable
nogridlock
Calmer traffic, Safe and easy
keep 4 lanes easy access to fr
Homeowner's have rights
safely crossing the street
no-diet
bike crosswalks residential
quiet calm
Turning lane
smart lights to make car traff Friendly to residents
unpolluted
Not just for cars
Complete Streets, safe and inv
quiet, less traffic, safe to w
friendly
For people
no backups onto Lawrence
genteel
keep all four lanes
For people not for cars
two lanes, safe, residential
safe, bicycling, friendly
Greenery bus connection from Apple to B
local
Put bikes in ISOLATED path awa
Smooth traffic flow
Sidewalk
protected bike lanes
safe flows calming
Safety.
safe bikeway
Road-diet
welcome peds, bikes
safe friendly green
Bikable
connectivity bicycles calm
Safer for predestrians Safety
square off street corners to s
Safer commute, slower traffic
Don't restrict parking
no backed up traffic
four
Bicycle corridor
Synchronized
Family friendly
Bike lanes safe
calmer
Improve safety and connectivit
bicycle, walking, friendly
Bike route
Leave it alone
More greenery
Traffic-flow
Road diet
flowing
peaceful
four lanes
Traffic law enforcement
Car
Police presence
lowspeeds
Car focused
Slow the traffic down, not to
complete
Convenient commute
Driver friendly
parkway
Stress free
Moving away
homeowners
Reduce traffic
less pollution
No change
BikeLaneCorridor
no parking = room for bikes
No merging lanes
No bike lane
Easy going
bike lane
Coordinated signals
Relaxing
Family
Pedestrian-friendly Bike lane corridor convenient
9LVLRQ
In order to gain a better understanding
of t
he long-term community vision
for the corridor, the City team asked
respondents to identify one to three words
which come to mind when thinking of
the future of Pruneridge Avenue. Some
RIWKHPRVWFRPPRQSKUDVHVLGHQWL¿HG
for the future of Pruneridge include
µ6DIH¶µ%LNH/DQHV¶DQGµSDUNLQJ¶DV
shown in the word-clouds to the right.
57 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Figure 19. Concepts 1 through 3 Feedback3KDVH2XWUHDFK6XPPDU\)LQGLQJV The City team brought initial designs for
Concept 1, 2, and 3 to the public for their
input in July, 2021. Meeting attendees were
asked to provide their support for or against
each design concept and provide general
comments on the designs. Feedback from the
SXEOLFKHOSHGWRVKDSHWKH¿QDOWKUHHFRQFHSWV
and are summarized below. Please refer to
Appendix B for all survey responses.

Concept 1: Four Lane Option
The combined results of the Round 2
workshops indicate that approximately 47%
of respondents did not support this concept
with just 38% of respondents supporting this
concept either fully or with minor changes.

Concept 2: Two Lane Option
Approximately 64% of survey respondents
indicated that they support this concept
either fully or with minor changes.

Concept 3: Parking Protected Option
Through both community workshops,
approximately 51% of respondents supported
Concept 3 either fully or with minor changes.
$GGLWLRQDOIHHGEDFN
The public also expressed concerns
regarding existing pedestrian and bicycle
comfort and safety needs in addition to the
potential impacts on parking, congestion,
and bicycle & pedestrian comfort from
the concept designs. A full summary of
feedback is provided in Appendix B.

Do not support
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Needs major
changes
Support with
minor changes
Full support
Concept 1 Concept 2 Concept 3
40%
31%
40%
20%
16%
11%
17%
18%
14%
23%
35%
35%
■ ■ ■
58 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
2135 4 1
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice
Concept 2:

Two Lane 24 2 23 24 4 12 1
Concept 1:

Four Lane
13 1 4 523 1
No Build 23 115
Concept 3:

Parking Protected
34 1223 2 21 2
Figure 20. Workshops 5 and 6 Combined Concept Ranking Preferences3KDVH2XWUHDFK6XPPDU\)LQGLQJV During Workshops 5 & 6, the City team engaged
with meeting attendees regarding revised
design concepts, based on community feedback.

Meeting attendees were asked to rank each
concept based on which they would most like
to see implemented. The combined results from
both workshops are presented in Figure 20.

Concept 1 feedback
)RXUODQHVZDVLGHQWL¿HGDVWKHWKLUG
or fourth choice by the majority of
workshop attendees (57%).

Concept 2 feedback
7ZR/DQHVUHFHLYHGRIYRWHVIURP
UHVSRQGHQWVDVWKHLU¿UVWRUVHFRQGFKRLFH
Concept 3 feedback
Parking Protected was selected as the
top choice by the highest number of
respondents (38%). Furthermore, a
majority of respondents (61%) selected this
concept as their top one or two options.

No Build feedback
The rankings from Phase 3 workshops highlight
WKDWWKHH[LVWLQJRUµ1R%XLOG¶RSWLRQLVWKH
last choice for a majority of respondents. In
Phase 3 43-57% of respondents indicated
that this option was their last choice.
2135 4 1
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice 5th Choice
Concept 2:

Two Lane
43 4 1 35
No Build 3 13 4 43
Concept 3:

Parking Protected
1 22 13 5
Concept 4:

Hybrid 4 35 43 41 3
Concept 1:

Four Lane 4 3 1 3
Figure 21. Workshop 7 Concept Ranking
- ~~------,-.
• •
- -------.
■ ~~---,-------
• •
•
•
•
•
59 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
Concept 4 feedback
During Community Workshop 7, attendees
were asked to rank the design concepts once
again, including the hybrid option Concept

4. The results of this ranking are highlighted
in Figure 21. This ranking highlights that
&RQFHSWZDVVHOHFWHGDVWKH¿UVWFKRLFHIRU
the largest portion of respondents (43%) and
Concept 4 was selected as the second choice
by the largest number of respondents (35%).

Additional feedback
Workshop attendees provided additional
feedback during the meeting on a variety of
items regarding the project including potential
YHKLFOHFRQJHVWLRQEHQH¿WVWRELF\FOHFRPIRUW
vehicle speeding impacts, and potential for
mixing concept alternatives. All comments
DUHUHÀHFWHGLQWKH&RPPHQW6XPPDU\
Spreadsheet included in $SSHQGL[%
Community Survey Results
7KH¿QDOFRPPXQLW\VXUYH\ZDVDYDLODEOH
online from May 23 through June 28,
2022. The results of this survey indicate
a strong preference for redesigning the
roadway, with 36% of respondents selecting
&RQFHSW
3DUNLQJ3URWHFWHG2SWLRQDV
their preferred concept and 37% selecting
&RQFHSW
7ZR/DQH2SWLRQDVWKHLUVHFRQG
most preferred concept. The No Build option
received nearly 54% of last place votes.

Figure 22. Final Community Preference Survey Results
1st Choice 2nd Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice 5th Choice
11 2
32 22 3
23 4
1 15
3 22
5 5
141
22 11
13 4422
1 11 2
13 3
11 54 3
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Concept 4: Hybrid
Concept 3: Parking Protected
Concept 2: Two Lane
Concept 1: Four Lane
xisting No Build
I
--~ I
I
- -----,--
1 ■ ■
r
■ ■
60 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara

04. Community Engagement
The City provided residents multiple
opportunities to engage with the project
throughout the 18 month duration. Table 10
categorizes all survey responses, community
workshop polls, and emails and phone calls
received throughout the project into either
supporting a change or not supporting a change.

On average, 74% of workshop attendees, 52% of
survey responses, and 38% of emails and phone
calls supported a changed design on the corridor.

A majority of responses received throughout
the project (55.4%) indicate support for
implementing a redesign concept on the corridor.

Outreach Activity Total
Responses
Supports No Change Supports Change
Responses Percentage Responses Percentage
Workshop 3 130 34 2 6% 96 74%
Workshop 4 12 0 0% 12 100%
Workshop 5 39 9 23% 30 77%
Workshop 6 15 5 33% 10 67%
Workshop 7 23 9 39% 14 61%
All Workshops

Online Survey 1 659 371 56% 288 44%
Online Survey 2 36 8 22% 28 78%
Online Survey 3 288 44 23% 144 77%
All Online Surveys

Total Email/Phone Calls 64 40 63% 24 38%
Total
Table 10. Consolidated Corridor Rankings
Implementation

05. The implementation guide provides a potential roadmap for full project implementation in order to provide
decision makers with considerations for implementation
DQGSKDVLQJRIWKH¿QDOSURMHFW
62 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara 5 ple entation
Cost Based Alternatives
The implementation of bicycle and pedestrian
projects may be piloted prior to full
LPSOHPHQWDWLRQZLWKSHUPDQHQW¿[WXUHV7KH
low-cost option below includes a possible pilot
project type implementation, to be evaluated at
a later date. This provides the opportunity to
reassess the need for and use of low-stress bicycle
and pedestrian facilities along the corridor.
/RZ3DLQW3RVW
Reducing the time to implementation, this
low-cost strategy is focused on providing
meaningful improvements using low-cost
materials and construction methods. This option
would implement the pedestrian improvements
LGHQWL¿HGLQ)LJXUHVZKLOHXVLQJSDLQW
where feasible. This allows for improvements
such as bulb-outs to be implemented quickly
with minimal maintenance requirements
and without reconstructing portions of the
intersection. The recommended pedestrian
improvements in the low-cost concept
accounts for approximately $1,768,000.

In order to reduce time to implementation
DQGRYHUDOOFRVWEXɣHUHGELF\FOHODQHV
&ODVV
II) and separated bikeway (Class IV) may be
implemented using a combination of paint and
WUDɤFGHOLQHDWRUV7KHFRVWRILPSOHPHQWDWLRQ
for this method ranges from $4.07 to
$4.26 million (see Table 11).

Concept 1, 2, or 4 Concept 3 or 4
Low-Cost (Quick-Build) $4.07 Million $ 4.26 Million
High-Cost (Long-Term) $ 7.22 Million $8.29 Million
+LJK&RQFUHWH&XUE
A long-term implementation may be completed
with concrete and may require new curbs along a
majority of the roadway. This method requires a
higher capital cost but is longer lasting than other
PDWHULDOVVXFKDVSDLQWDQGWUDɤFGHOLQHDWRUV
Under this option, the City would install
SHGHVWULDQLPSURYHPHQWVLGHQWL¿HGLQWKLV
plan using a combination of paint and concrete,
including moving existing curb lines to install
concrete bulb-outs. Additionally, this option
LQFOXGHVSURYLGLQJSHUPDQHQWEXɣHUHG
bicycle lane or separated bikeway facilities
utilizing low-impact materials including paint
DQGWUDɤFGHOLQHDWRUVDVZHOODVKLJKHUFRVW
materials including concrete for creating
PRUHUREXVWSDYHGEXɣHUVEHWZHHQYHKLFOHV
and bicyclists. This option ranges in cost
from $7.22 to $8.29 million (see Table 11).

Table 11. Cost Based Alternatives
63 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara 5 ple entation
Funding Options
/2&$/$1'5(*,21$/
*5$17352*5$06
2016 MEASURE B
Santa Clara voters approved a half-cent sales tax
in 2016 to fund transportation infrastructure
investments. Measure B is expected to raise $6.3
billion (2017 dollars) over 30 years to fund nine
SURJUDPFDWHJRULHV7KH/RFDO6WUHHWVDQG5RDGV
Program returns funds to the cities and the
County on a formula basis to be used to repair
and maintain the street system. The allocation
is based on the population of the cities and the
&RXQW\RI6DQWD&ODUD¶VURDGDQGH[SUHVVZD\
lane mileage. Cities and the County will be
required to demonstrate that these funds would
be used to enhance and not replace their current
investments for road system maintenance and
repair. The program would also require that
cities and the County apply Compete Streets
best practices in order to improve bicycle and
pedestrian elements of the street system. If a
city or the County has a Pavement Condition
Index score of at least 70, it may use the funds
for other congestion relief projects. $250
million has been allocated towards the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Program. Within the Bicycle
and Pedestrian Program, funds are divided
between capital projects (80 percent), education
and encouragement programs (15 percent) and
planning studies (5 percent). The education and
encouragement funds will be allocated to cities
based on a population formula with a $10,000
annual minimum allocation per city; $250,000
will be reserved for countywide programs.

Funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects are
applied to a select list of projects approved by the
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Board.

Funds are programmed by VTA.

TRANSPORTATION FUND FOR CLEAN AIR

COUNTY PROGRAM MANAGER FUND
The Bay Area Air Quality Management District
(BAAQMD) administers funds to the VTA
for projects that reduce vehicle emissions
including bicycle projects. These funds come
from a $4 vehicle registration surcharge in
Bay Area counties and can be used as a match
for competitive state or federal programs.

Funds are programmed by VTA.

ONE BAY AREA GRANT
7KH2QH%D\$UHDJUDQWSURJUDP
2%$*

emphasizes funding for projects within Priority
Development Areas (PDAs) in the region that
are in-line with housing and land use goals.

Projects that are within or provide access to
WKHVH3'$VFRXOGTXDOLI\IRU2%$*JUDQWV
Funds are programmed by the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Santa
Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA).

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT
ACT ARTICLE 3
Transportation Development Act Article 3 (TDA
3) provides funding annually for bicycle and
pedestrian projects. Two percent of TDA funds
collected within the county are used for TDA 3
projects. MTC policies require that all projects be
reviewed by a Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory
Committee or similar body before approval.

Funds are programmed by VTA.
64 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara 5 ple entation
67$7($1')('(5$/*5$17
352*5$06

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM (ATP)
*RYHUQRU%URZQVLJQHGOHJLVODWLRQLQ
which consolidates existing federal and
state transportation programs including the
Transportation Alternatives program, Bicycle
Transportation Account, and State Safe Routes to
School, into a single program which is focused on
expanding and enhancing active transportation
across the state. The ATP program is intended
to increase the use of active transportation,
enhance safety for non-motorized users,
improve public health, and advance regional
*UHHQKRXVH*DV
*+*
UHGXFWLRQJRDOV
pursuant to SB 375 (of 2008) and SB 341 (of
2009). This grant program funds a wide variety
of activities and projects which further the
goals of the program including infrastructure,
non-infrastructure, and planning studies.

Funds are programmed by Caltrans
with guidance from the CTC.

HIGHWAY SAFETY

IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
&DOWUDQVRɣHUV+LJKZD\6DIHW\,PSURYHPHQW
Program (HSIP) grants every one to two years.

Projects on any publicly owned road or active
transportation facility are eligible, including
bicycle and pedestrian improvements. HSIP
focuses on projects that explicitly address
documented safety challenges through proven
countermeasures, are implementation-
UHDG\DQGGHPRQVWUDWHFRVWHɣHFWLYHQHVV
Funds are programmed by Caltrans.

OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANT
7KH&DOWUDQV2ɤFHRI7UDɤF6DIHW\
276

makes grants available to local and state public
agencies for programs that help them enforce
WUDɤFODZVHGXFDWHWKHSXEOLFLQWUDɤFVDIHW\
DQGSURYLGHYDULHGDQGHɣHFWLYHPHDQVRI
reducing fatalities, injuries, and economic
losses from collisions. Funding can be used
IRUVDIHW\WUDLQLQJVELNHKHOPHWVDQGWUDɤF
safety campaigns, among other activities.

Funds are programmed by OTS.
27+(567$7(352*5$06

ROAD MAINTENANCE AND

REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Senate Bill 1 (SB1) created the Road Maintenance
and Rehabilitation Program (RMRP) to address
deferred maintenance on state highways
and local road systems. Program funds can
be spent on both design and construction
HɣRUWV2QVWUHHWDFWLYHWUDQVSRUWDWLRQUHODWHG
maintenance projects are eligible if program
maintenance and other thresholds are met.

Funds are allocated to eligible jurisdictions.

Funds are programmed by the State Controller’s
2ɤFHZLWKJXLGDQFHIURPWKH&7&
65 Pruneridge Complete Streets Plan 2022 City of Santa Clara 5 ple entation
Table 12. Funding Sources by Type
Local Source Formula Grants
(Federal/State)
Formula Grants
(Regional)
Competitive
Grants
(Federal/State)
Competitive
Grants
(Regional)
Santa Clara Capital
Improvement Plan

&,3
*HQHUDO)XQG
/RFDO6WUHHWVDQG
Roads Program (SB1)
Measure B (2016)
/RFDO6WUHHWVDQG
Roads
Highway Safety
Improvement Program
(HSIP)
2QH%D\$UHD*UDQW
3URJUDP
2%$*

7UDɤF,PSDFW)HHV TDA Article 3 Vehicle Registration
Fee
2ɤFHRI7UDɤF6DIHW\
(OTS)
Measure B (2016)
Bicycle and Pedestrian
Planning Projects
*DV7D[ Active Transportation
Program (ATP)
Transportation Fund
for Clean Air (TFCA)
Appendices
A. Working Papers
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
([LVWLQJ&RQGLWLRQV0HPR
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
3DUNLQJ8WLOL]DWLRQ0HPR
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
)XWXUH9ROXPH)RUHFDVWV
Ń :RUNLQJ3DSHU
7UDɤF$QDO\VLV0HPR
B. Survey Results
C. Public Outreach Materials
D. Collision Data
Appendix A
Working Paper 1

Memorandum
Date: September 3, 2021
To: City of Santa Clara
CC: Mr. Jeff Knowles, Alta Planning + Design, Inc.

From: Trisha Dudala, Gary Black

Subject: Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets – Baseline Conditions Analy sis

The City of Santa Clara was recently awarded a California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) grant to implement complete streets improvements along the 2.2-mile segment of Pruneridge Avenue between Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester Boulevard (eastern city limit). Complete Streets are roadways that are designed to enable safe and comfortable access for all roadway users; pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and automobile drivers of all ages and abilities. It is noted that a Complete Streets Project was already implemented on the approximately 1-mile segment of Pruneridge Avenue west of Pomeroy Avenue between Tantau Avenue and Pomeroy Avenue. This 1-mile segment formerly was four travel lanes undivided and now consists of one travel lane in each direction and a center turn-lane for automobile traffic, a bicycle lane in each direction, a parking lane, and a pedestrian sidewalk on both sides of the roadway.

Baseline Conditions analysis
The study area consists of a 2.2-mile section of Pruneridge Avenue. In coordination with the City, a total of 25 intersections were identified for study: 12 intersections along Pruneridge Avenue and 13 intersections along Forbes Avenue, Homestead Road, and Mauricia Avenue (see Figure 1). These intersections are shown in Table 1. The reason to study some intersections off Pruneridge Avenue is that any reduced traffic capacity on Pruneridge could lead to an increase in volume on parallel streets.

The baseline conditions analysis was conducted based on peak hour volumes that are reflective of pre-COVID conditions, existing lane geometries, and existing signal timings as described below.

Data Collection
Intersection Lane Geometries
The existing lane geometries were determined from maps and field visits. The existing lane geometries at all 25 study intersections are shown on Figure 2.

Intersection Turning Movement Counts
Weekday AM (7-9) and PM (4-6) peak hour traffic counts were conducted at all 25 intersections, including bicycle and pedestrian counts on Thursday, February 25th, 2021. Due to shelter in place orders first issued in March 2020, most businesses and schools were closed, and people started working at home to the extent possible. While some businesses have subsequently reopened subject to certain restrictions, traffic volumes continue to be substantially below pre-COVID jiliP ~
(I} ~ ~~XAGON T~ANSPO~TATION (ONSULTANTS, IN<.
f""'\
cm
• I
4 North Second Street , Suite 400 · San Jose, California 95113 · phone 408 .9 71. 6100 • fax 408 .9 71.6102 · www hextrans .com1 Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

2 Table 1
Study Intersections
conditions. Thus, to be conservative, the baseline conditions analysis is based on pre-COVID conditions. Hexagon has historical counts from the past two years (pre-COVID) for 8 of the 25 study intersections. Along Pruneridge Avenue, historical counts are available at all four major intersections at Kiely Boulevard, San Tomas Expressway, Saratoga Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. The total AM and PM peak hour intersection volumes for these 8 locations based on the historical counts are shown in Table 2. A comparison of the historical counts to the 2021 counts showed that traffic volumes in the study area are currently 63% lower during the AM peak hour and 42% percent lower during the PM peak hour. For the 8 intersections where historical counts are available, the historical counts were used as the baseline volumes for analysis. For all other locations where historical counts are not available, Year 2021 traffic counts were increased by 63% during the AM peak hour and 42% during the PM peak hour to estimate normal pre-COVID baseline volumes. For intersections along Pruneridge Avenue, the volumes were further balanced between the intersections so that there is no loss of traffic along the corridor. For example, between the intersections of Kiely Boulevard and San Tomas Expressway which both have historical peak hour counts, there is one study intersection, Tanoak Drive for which pre-COVID volumes were developed. After applying a growth factor of 63% during the AM peak hour and 42% during the PM peak hour to the 2021 turning movements counts at Tanoak Drive intersection, the volumes turning into and out of Tanoak Drive were adjusted so that there is no loss in traffic volume along the # Intersection Control
Acceptable
LOS
1 Pomeroy Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
2 Cronin Drive and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
3 Pruneridge Avenue and Radcliffe Drive OSWC D
4 Woodhams Road and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
5 Redwood Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue OWSC D
6 Kiely Boulevard and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
7 Tanoak Drive and Pruneridge Avenue OWSC D
8 San Tomas Expressway and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
9 Saratoga Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
10 Cypress Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
11 Los Padres Boulevard and Pruneridge Avenue OWSC D
12 Winchester Boulevard and Pruneridge Avenue Signal D
13 Pomeroy Avenue and Forbes Avenue AWSC D
14 Woodhams Road and Forbes Avenue AWSC D
15 Kiely Boulevard and Forbes Avenue Signal D
16 San Tomas Expressway and Forbes Avenue Signal D
17 Los Padres Boulevard and Forbes Avenue AWSC D
18 Pomeroy Avenue and Homestead Road Signal D
19 Woodhams Road and Homestead Road OWSC D
20 Kiely Boulevard and Homestead Road Signal D
21 San Tomas Expressway and Homestead Road* Signal E
22 Los Padres Boulevard and Homestead Road Signal D
23 Cronin Drive and Mauricia Avenue AWSC D
24 Woodhams Road and Mauricia Avenue AWSC D
25 Kiely Boulevard and Mauricia Avenue TWSC D
Notes:
* denotes CMP intersection
Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

3 Pruneridge Avenue corridor. This is a conservative assumption as there are a number of residential streets that connect to Pruneridge Avenue which are not being analyzed but the volume is being accounted for at one of the study intersections. The baseline AM and PM peak hour volumes are shown on Figure 3.

Table 2
Comparison of Historical Traffic Counts

Signal Timings
There are a total of 16 signalized study intersections. Signal timing information for all intersections were obtained from the City of Santa Clara, Santa Clara County and City of San Jose. The minimum green, yellow and red times and pedestrian clearance times were entered based on the signal timing sheets. The minimum green time was entered as the sum of pedestrian walk time plus the pedestrian clearance time, where there was a pedestrian phase.

Average Daily Traffic Counts (ADT)
Seven-day average daily traffic counts along with vehicle classification counts were conducted at four locations along Pruneridge Avenue on Thursday, February 25th, 2021. The seven-day, weekday (Tuesday through Thursday) and weekend (Saturday and Sunday) counts are summarized in Table 3 and also included in the appendix.

#I ntersection Historical
Count Date
Historical
Count
2021
Count
%
decrease
Historical
Count Date
Historical
Count
2021
Count
%
decrease
6 Pruneridge/Kiely Boulevard 5/10/218 2,780 944 66% 5/10/218 3,166 1,810 43% 8 Pruneridge/San Tomas Expressway 1/23/2019 5,462 2,015 63% 5/24/2018 5,609 3,593 36% 9 Pruneridge/Saratoga Avenue 1/22/2019 2,342 962 59% 1/22/2019 2,654 1,798 32% 12 Pruneridge/Winchester Boulevard 5/24/2018 2,234 926 59% 5/24/2018 2,736 1,581 42% 15 Forbes/Kiely Boulevard 5/10/2018 1,670 556 67% 5/10/2018 2,139 936 56% 16 Forbes/San Tomas Expressway 5/24/2018 4,470 1,719 62% 5/24/2018 4,591 2,776 40% 20 Homestead/Kiely Boulevard 5/16/2019 3,379 1,197 65% 5/10/2018 3,845 2,064 46% 21 Homestead/San Tomas Expressway 5/16/2019 6,079 2,249 63% 11/8/2018 5,975 3,537 41% Average 63% 42%
PM Peak HourAM Peak Hour
Santa
Clara
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12
13 14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
11 Kiely Blvd
Pruneridge Ave
Saratoga Ave
Mauricia Ave
Lawrence Expy
Pomeroy Ave
Los Padres Blvd
Scott BlvdScott BlvdScott Blvd
Woodhams Rd
N Winchester Blvd
Forbes Ave
San Tomas ExpwySan Tomas ExpwySan Tomas Expwy
Tanoak Dr
Cypress AveCypress Ave
Homestead RdHomestead RdHomestead Rd
Benton StBenton StBenton St
Stevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek Blvd
Cronin DrCronin Dr
RedwoodRedwood
AveAve
RadcliffeRadcliffe
DrDr
Cypress Ave
Cronin Dr
Redwood
Ave
Radcliffe
Dr
Cypress Cypress AveAveCypress Ave
X = Study Intersection
= Existing 4-Lane Roadway with On-Street Parking
LEGEND
= Complete Streets – 2 Lanes with Center Turn-Lane, Bike Lanes & Parking Lane Pruneridge Complete Streets
Figure 1
Study Intersections
= ~[XAGON 0
NORTH
Notto Scale
Pruneridge Complete Streets
1 >,.,
~~ 2
§
a.
.J l+ L. t....
-- .. Pruneiidge
I ~
Pruneridge
I~ Ava Ava
.J I~ - 11 y
-
-v
C
·1:
e~ uo
5 6
~
- ~ 1 l+ -.. + Pruneridge Pruneridge
i ~ Ave Ave
rG .J ~ ~ -+ y ;Tr -.+ --+
..
i 2::-o
u
G>>
2m
-- -----9 10
.J!!l+ ~ ~ ~
- ..-Pruneridge
n + Prunoridgo
Ave Ave n
.J n ...t+ r~
- iii,.. 1+ .. ..
"'
I~
~
~ ..
~~ u-<
13 14
~ L. ~ 4--+- Forbes Fornes Ave Ave ti .~ 0 ...
➔ ;r ➔ 1+
"' >, E
e "' .c .,
lo u s: a:
17 18
~ +- .J ! L. ~
-Forbes + Ave ... ,., Homestead
f ~ Rd
" ~,
➔ 1+
.J
---+- ; Tr+ ..
>,
!I) e e .. :ga] -g E<1
..JCl.iil i~
LEGEND
• = Sign ◊ = HOV Lane
~ = Signalized Intersection
3 le 4 u j
a::
•
fl L.
~
+4 .i:... r
Pruneridge
-
Prtmaridge
I~ Ava Ave
11 -4 -4 ;r --+ .. ,.

E
"' .c:
lo s:cr:
7 -"' ~
to Cl 8
0 C: PM {2. ◊
•
.J l+ .Jl!!L.L.
~
~ +-
- !~ + Pruner!dge Pruneridge
Ave Ave
I ~
J J
~ii Tr - --
~ ◊
1W,
c~j "0 {/)f--
--11 12 .H~ ,, m
" a.

I. +A+ fl l L. ~
-
~
Pruneridge Pruneridge
I ~ +
Ave
-
Ave
.J H i TT r+ -4 -+ --+ +
i
!-g
S:iii
15 16
PM
◊
.{ !t .J!l!L. t_
+- ..-Forbes Forbes
Ave I ~ Ave ~
1:.~ / ~
➔ 1r
-4 ; r Ti r + ◊
~
~iii
19 --Homestead +
Rd
--+
ti ..
"' E
!

8.,, s:a::
/\M
c•II mox
C/ll-W
20 fl 1 L.
~
-+
Homeslead
H Rd
,.. 19 .J
-+
~11
~Tl r ..
.z,..,
!Zffi -
Figure 2
Existing Lane Configurations
@
NORTH
""1105-
Pruneridge Complete Streets
-21 22
◊
~
+--
.Jlllll+ r ~ r
Homestead
I ~
Homestead
f ~ Rd Rd
.J ~~ .J ~~
.J
"l~lll lr+ .. -.. ◊
ci~ "' rni'o
t'.)l~J'i
Ofl:I~
..JCl.lD
25 0
+ill. 4-Mauricla
Ave
➔ 41lr
..
.?>-o ., >
S2iii
LEGEND
S i = Sign ◊ = HOV Lane
= Signa lized Intersection
= ~[XAGON
23 .L .¾, r
Mau~cia
Ava ~ ~
"
1+ ➔
C
c
e~ uo
24 ¼ 4t+ 4-
Mauncia
Ave j ~
1+ ➔ 1+
e .. <=
i~
Figure 2
Existing Lane Configurations
0 NORTI-t ..........

Pruneridge Complete Streets
1* •i;-g! 2" 3* ;;c ~c ~
4*
-E ~ ---;:;l;r :::;- _II. cow~
:: t_ 229(121) ~ ~ 'L 18(10) ~ ~ ~ · t_ 42(42)
m ..__ 872(539) 983(567) ..,.. ..__ 1015(615) '° N <0 +- 937(564) I ..--- +- I ..--- AP~enerldge I I 31(17) Pruneiidga 4-' Prune((dge ,-- 66'62) Pruner\dga 4-' • .., + Ave Ave • \: Ave1
--7-6(1-23-) _____________ ,__ ___ ---.---_r+ __ ,____24(-35-) ------------- 16(12) i r+ 380(936) --+ 378(965) --+ ;;-- N' 459(972) --+ 440(925) --+ ,;, ~ 0 93(105) 7,- ~ ~ 16(40) ; ~ ¥ ~
.;:::::: o e -q'" ---:t-co
+- 968(606)
~~neridge + 81(58)
9 533(967) -. :1 ~
'32(29) • ;::; ~
i "'<t ;:ii;
al~ o:c
M~ ..... .---_
..... (0 c:,
8 ~ ~ 'L 36(33)
..... <'> <'> +- 676(328)
:~nerictga .J l l+ ,r 242(106)
120(116) j r+
222(684) --+ - - -
10(9) + ~~ ~ co-ca N -"<tU")
13"'
<O
j ~ O'>
~m a,>
tllC
_,.,., -
~~g
m ~ N t_ 54(61) ..- N <0
.J 1 l+ +- 30(14)
Forbes
Ave ,r 51(33)
17*
24(26) i r
8(21)--+ ---,.,., ..-N
11(10)+ ~~ ¥
>- N<'>
~ ?l
~~
a.<C
6 10"'
14*
C
'E
e~ uo
sf:_ ( z;; g~ t_ 5 5)
.J 1 +- 65(49)
Forbes
Ave • 19(14)
18*
11(10) +.. j ,.-
43(66) --+ _!_ _ ~
O'> c:, ,-...
30(24) + :: ~ =
~ - -..::,- ...-
1 1.,
~o:
.- 0, -......... O'>
..- N O'>
~ ?l ~ t_ 205(134)
.- N ..- +- 1139(752)
~~mestead .J l l. 70(57)
113(108) .J T r
732(1075) --+ - - -
64(73)-. ~~ e
>, ffi?::.~ e_ (0
., N
~f Cl.<(
•Growth factors were used to develop baseline pre-COVID volumes .

LEGEND
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
~[XAGON
I~
~c 8 g --0 m MN..-.....
7*
M Ni- ~~~
~ ~ t_ 40(40) ~ ~ ~ t_ 184(156)
<0 N ._.... 933(553) ..- a> a> +- 617(312)
Prtmendge .J ~~8nendge .,J ! l+ 3( 14)
f'--A-'-'vo'---------,,<-4------ ,,.
16(26)
535(989) --+
110(99) .J T r
253(600) --+ - - -
1s3(312l -. ~ ~ re
u=;-~~
~ gJ ~
!! ~
11* 12
<O _,.,.,_
~
~ t_ 75(179)
<') <O ,.,.,
~ ~ ~ t_ 30(43)
Prunendge .J
Ava
~ +- 563(426)
"'<t .... <'> +- 384(296)
::nendge .J ! L. 56(109)
20(32)
399(897) --+
40(59) T r
319(569)--+ - --a) -..... c:,
119(299) ~ ~~~
15 -,.,.,_
-N..-
0>0'>~
~ ~ co t_ 59(27)
0) <') <')
16 1! ........ <O ,-., CO"'<tO'> ....... ,-...
g~
~iii
.J l l+ +- 97(61)
Forbes
Ave • 43(71)
19*
37(37) +-. j ,,+
73(80) --+ ..l.-~ LO a, ,-...
25(27) + ~~ e
"'<t -o N CO v
(X) ,_
wi:::=--
~ ;;! ffi
~ ~ z;; t_ 169(148)
+- 1110(850) N <'> ,-... +- 735(550)
~~-~m_es_1e_e<1 ___ .,.....,__5_7_(8_5) __ ~~mestead .J ! l. 88(1 23) r 146(171 i r r
~ 603(714) --+ - - -
.:o 101(249) ---. ~ ~ e C.O .__,._N
~'O
"> SZiii
..- ..... Cl> co ,-...
..... (0
Figure 3
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Traffic Volumes
0 NORlli ..........

Pruneridge Complete Streets
21 -co
C,,M- -COU")O -r----VNO CO(OC)
- r ~ ~ ~ 't_ 157(35) ~ ~; 't_ 19(15)
N ,..__ M +- 543(348) v <O N +- 504(350)
~~meslead +J 1 l. + 93(71) ~~mestaad .,J 1 l. + 7(16)
342(240) J
~Tr
25(31) J
~Tr 349(619)-+ 324(516)-+ ---- --- _....., ;::_- ai" M co ..--M 136(169) + 1.t"l MO 9(37)+ -c- LO,......

Mtc~ -..---1.0 _,..__ <OON ..- o on .....
"'I ~ .. N U')
li~J'i ~ ~ij ti}!- ..JC.ID
25*
o-N U') _,._ .....

U") - ..... U') 0 __, 't_ 73{71) -NM CO M v
+---- 5(9)
Mauricla .J 1 l+ ,.- 11(5) /we
27(10) J ~Tr 3(3)---t ---46(42) +

1.0 0 CO V ..-N
-U? -=-..-v U") .--
r--
=
(0
., >
52iii
*Growt h factors were used to develop baseline pre-COV ID volumes .

LEGEND
XX(XX) = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes
= ~[XAGON
23*
Mau~cia
Ave
24*
-..-- -en-CD..--.-.. rn-.ro
'L. 35(21) <O ..... (0
't_ 14(21) ;:;~ ~ -- ..... en co - t--- 14( 19) v <0 M
+---- 11 ( 17) .J 1 L. .J 1 l.

Mauncia + 3(10) + 5(3) Ave
27(19) ....7 57(64) J
+-i T r ~Tr
22(30) -t 24(10)-+ LO 00 ~ r::-u;-G" 5(9) + -<O .....
11(17) + -,-__- co --co_..,... oco ,..__ ..... e <O

1.t"l ..

C <=
c
i~ e~ uo
Figure 3
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Traffic Volumes
0 NORll-i ..........

Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

9 Table 3
Pruneridge Avenue - Average Daily Traffic Counts

As shown in Table 3, an average daily traffic of approximately 8,000 was measured along Pruneridge Avenue. Based on the vehicle classification counts, the traffic was composed of approximately 1.5% bicycle traffic, 90% passenger cars, 7% pick-up trucks/vans and 1.5% trucks/buses. Also shown in the table for comparison are the pre-COVID ADT along Pruneridge Avenue. For segments, 1, 2 and 3, the pre-COVID ADT was calculated based on the historical PM peak hour turning movement counts at Kiely Boulevard, Saratoga Avenue and Winchester Boulevard, assuming that approximately 11% of the total daily traffic occurs during the PM peak.

This is based on June 2012 PM peak hour count at the intersection of Pruneridge and Pomeroy and June 2012 ADT count on the segment of Pruneridge Avenue to the west of Pomeroy Avenue included in the Pruneridge Avenue Bicycle Lane Improvements Post-Construction Traffic Study by Kimely-Horn and Associates, Inc. For segment 4, the pre-COVID ADT is based on the daily traffic count from November 2018. The comparison shows that the current ADT on Pruneridge Avenue is approximately 45% lower compared to pre-COVID volumes.

Bicycle Counts
Average weekday and weekend bicycle traffic counts conducted at four locations on Pruneridge Avenue in February 2021 are summarized in Table 4. The 7-day count is the average number of bicycles on Pruneridge Avenue in a 24-hour period averaged over a 7-day period (Sunday through Saturday). The Weekday (T-Th) count shows the average of the total number of bicycles on Pruneridge Avenue in a 24-hour period counted on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. Weekday (AM Peak) is the average number of bicycles in the peak one-hour occurring between 7AM – 9AM on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday. Weekday (PM Peak) is the average number of bicycles in the peak one-hour occurring between 4PM – 6PM on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday.

The Weekend (Sat&Sun) count is the total number of bicycles on Pruneridge Avenue in a 24-hour period averaged over the weekend (Saturday and Sunday). The Weekend (AM Peak) is the average number of bicycles in the peak one-hour occurring between 7AM – 9AM on Saturday and Sunday. Weekend (PM Peak) is the average number of bicycles in the peak one-hour occurring # Location EB WB Total EB WB Total
1 Pruneridge (Lawrence - Pomeroy) 7-day 4,076 4,188 8,264 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,141 4,236 8,377 7,451 7,622 15,073
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,877 4,017 7,894 - - -
2 Pruneridge (Pomeroy - Kiely) 7-day 4,093 4,045 8,138 - - - Weekday (T-Th) 4,176 4,107 8,283 7,392 7,269 14,661
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,841 3,832 7,673 ---
3 Pruneridge (Kiely - Saratoga) 7-day 3,920 3,569 7,489 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,090 3,580 7,670 7,626 6,675 14,301
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 3,595 3,398 6,993 ---
4 Pruneridge (Saratoga - Winchester) 7-day 4,421 3,858 8,279 --- Weekday (T-Th) 4,448 3,851 8,298 7,724 6,688 14,412
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 4,223 3,709 7,932 - - -
Notes:

Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

10 between 4PM – 6PM on Saturday and Sunday. The percentage of bicycle traffic varied between

0.5% to 1.8% of the total traffic.

Table 4
Pruneridge Avenue – Bicycle Traffic Counts

Travel Time Runs and speeds
A total of five travel time runs were conducted in each direction on Pruneridge Avenue during the AM and PM peak hours using a GPS device and the floating car travel time methodology on Thursday, February 25th, 2021 (see Table 5).

#L ocation EB W B T otal
1 Pruneridge (Lawrence - Pomeroy) 7-day 13 26 40
Weekday (T-Th) 13 26 39
Weekday (AM Peak) 2 3 5
Weekday (PM Peak) 3 4 7
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 16 32 47
Weekend (AM Peak) 2 5 7
Weekend (PM Peak) 3 7 9
2 Pruneridge (Pomeroy - Kiely) 7-day 38 21 59
Weekday (T-Th) 40 22 62
Weekday (AM Peak) 4 3 7
Weekday (PM Peak) 8 6 13
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 44 23 67
Weekend (AM Peak) 6 5 11
Weekend (PM Peak) 8 5 13
3 Pruneridge (Kiely - Saratoga) 7-day 57 38 96
Weekday (T-Th) 55 38 93
Weekday (AM Peak) 5 4 9
Weekday (PM Peak) 7 7 14
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 62 30 92
Weekend (AM Peak) 9 5 14
Weekend (PM Peak) 8 6 14
4 Pruneridge (Saratoga - Winchester) 7-day 95 53 148
Weekday (T-Th) 95 39 134
Weekday (AM Peak) 11 6 17
Weekday (PM Peak) 9 8 17
Weekend (Sat&Sun) 83 61 144
Weekend (AM Peak) 7 9 16
Weekend (PM Peak) 7 10 17
Bicycle Summary
2021 Average Counts
Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

11 Table 5
Pruneridge Avenue - Travel Time Runs

The average travel time on eastbound Pruneridge Avenue was 358 seconds (6 minutes) during the AM peak hour and 462 seconds (8 minutes) during the PM peak hour. The average travel time on westbound Pruneridge Avenue was 308 seconds (5 minutes) during the AM peak hour and 365 seconds (6 minutes) during the PM peak hour. The peak direction of traffic on Pruneridge Avenue during the AM peak hour is westbound, and the peak direction of traffic during the PM peak hour is eastbound. The travel times include vehicular delays from waiting at signalized intersections. The intersections of San Tomas Expressway, Saratoga Avenue, and Winchester Boulevard were observed to have long minimum greens that resulted in long wait times for vehicles on Pruneridge Avenue. Although we do not have pre-COVID travel times for comparison, these travel times provide a good baseline for validation of the travel times from the simulation analysis of the Pruneridge corridor.

The posted speed limit on Pruneridge Avenue is 35 mph in the study area. The 85 th percentile
speed at four locations along Pruneridge Avenue is summarized in Table 6. As shown in Table 6, the 85% percentile speed in the study area varied between 36 mph to 41 mph and the data showed that on an average 37% of the traffic to be traveling at higher than the posted speed limit.

Table 6
Pruneridge Avenue – Speed Profile

Roadway Segment
Peak
Hour 12345 A v e r a g e
AM 375 294 351 391 378 358
PM 305 401 543 547 513 462
AM 271 268 291 339 371 308
PM 392 408 284 351 388 365
Note
Pruneridge - Eastbound
(Pomeroy to Winchester)
Pruneridge Westbound
(Winchester to Pomeroy)
Travel Time (seconds)
Travel times conducted on Thursday, February 25, 2021 using a GPS device and floating car methodology # Location Direction
Speed
(85th Percentile)
% of Vehicles
( > 35mph)
1 Lawrence to Pomeroy EB 36 mph 22%
WB 41 mph 49%
2 Pomeroy to Kiely EB 38 mph 31%
WB 39 mph 44%
3 Kiely to Saratoga EB 39 mph 39%
WB 34 mph 9%
4 Saratoga to Winchester EB 40 mph 48%
WB 41 mph 57%
Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

12 Intersection Delay and Level of Service (LOS)
Traffic operations analysis was conducted using the simulation software VISSIM by PTV Vision for all intersections along Pruneridge Avenue. The simulation analysis takes into consideration the impacts of vehicular queues on intersection operation attributed to the proposed lane reduction on Pruneridge Avenue. For all other intersections, the VISTRO software by PTV Vision was used and traffic operations were analyzed based on isolated intersection analysis methodology. This is consistent with the methodology that is typically used to evaluate traffic impacts from land use development projects. Since the proposed project would not result in any physical improvements that would affect the existing intersection capacity along the parallel streets and would only add trips to some of the turning movements, it was determined that a simulation analysis would not be required. Although two different software are used, the LOS is defined in the same way and is comparable to the LOS defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). VISSIM allows visual displays and fine-tuning of operating characteristics along Pruneridge Avenue, which are not necessary on the parallel streets.

For the purpose of this study, level of service (LOS) D or better is considered acceptable intersection operation, and LOS E or F is considered deficient operation, except for the CMP intersections along San Tomas Expressway. For CMP intersections, LOS E or better is considered acceptable intersection operation, and LOS F is considered deficient operation.

The VISSIM model was developed by coding the roadway network along Pruneridge Avenue between Pomeroy Avenue and Winchester Avenue based on the existing lane geometry. The study intersections were coded with turn lanes and traffic signals. The signal timing information was based on the timing sheets obtained from the City of Santa Clara, Santa Clara County, and City of San Jose. The baseline conditions model was first coded based on the February 2021 AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts to match the travel times collected in the field. Table 7 below shows a comparison of the travel times collected in the field and travel times obtained from the VISSIM Model.

Table 7
Simulation Model Travel Times

As shown in the table, the travel times from the model are marginally higher compared to the travel times measured in the field, representing a conservative analysis. This model was then used to analyze the adjusted pre-COVID volumes that were developed by applying a growth factor to the 2021 counts. As shown in the table, the model did not show any increase in travel time between the 2021 counts and the pre-COVID volumes in the non-peak directions (eastbound during the AM Field
Measured
Peak
Hour
2021
Counts
2021
Counts
Adjusted
Pre-COVID
Volumes
Pruneridge Eastbound AM 358 416 440
PM 462 481 642
Pruneridge Westbound AM 308 420 496
PM 365 432 446
Travel Time (seconds)
Vissim Model
Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

13 peak hour and westbound during the PM peak hour). For the peak directions of traffic, westbound during the AM peak hour and eastbound during the PM peak hour, the travel time increased by 1 minute and 3 minutes, respectively.

The intersection delays and levels of service during pre-pandemic conditions are shown in Table 8.

As shown in Table 8, all intersections are operating at acceptable levels of service except for the Pruneridge Avenue/San Tomas Expressway intersection. The analysis shows that based on the pre-pandemic volumes, this intersection operates at unacceptable LOS F during the AM peak hour and LOS E during the PM peak hour.

At the unsignalized intersection of Tanoak Drive, the analysis shows that the southbound left-turn from Tanoak Drive to eastbound Pruneridge Avenue operates at unacceptable LOS F during the PM peak hour. This is because, when the eastbound traffic on Pruneridge Avenue stops at the San Tomas Expressway traffic light, the queues extend past Tanoak Drive, resulting in long delay for traffic from Tanoak Drive to turn onto eastbound Pruneridge Avenue.

At the unsignalized intersection of Kiley Boulevard and Mauricia Avenue, the analysis shows that traffic on Mauricia Avenue operates at unacceptable LOS F during the PM peak hour.

The average and maximum queue lengths on Pruneridge Avenue at the signalized intersections in the study area during the AM and PM peak hours are shown in Table 9 and illustrated on Figures 4 and 5. These queue lengths are based on analyzing the pre-pandemic volumes. The queue lengths are shown along Pruneridge Avenue so that any changes under project conditions (with the implementation of complete streets) can be compared to baseline conditions.

The queuing analysis shows that during the AM peak hour, on westbound Pruneridge Avenue, which is the peak direction of traffic, the average queue lengths at signalized intersections can vary between 2 cars and 15 cars per lane and the maximum queue lengths can vary between 8 cars and 38 cars per lane. The queue lengths during the AM peak hour do not extend into the upstream signalized intersections. However, the queues extend past some of the residential streets that are located upstream of the traffic signals. The maximum queues on westbound Pruneridge Avenue extend past Sloat Court at Cronin Avenue, past Luther Drive at Kiely Boulevard, and 100 feet short of Saratoga Avenue at San Tomas Expressway.

During the PM peak hour, the peak direction of traffic is eastbound Pruneridge Avenue. The average queue length on eastbound Pruneridge Avenue at traffic signals can vary between 1 car and 32 cars per lane and the maximum queue lengths can very between 14 cars and 68 cars per lane. The maximum queue length on eastbound Pruneridge Avenue extends 200 feet short of Lawrence Expressway at Pomeroy Avenue, past Drake Court at Woodhams Road, past Tanoak Drive, Gamblin Drive and Luther Drive at San Tomas Expressway, past the retail complex driveway at Saratoga Avenue, up to Harold Avenue at Cypress Avenue and past Crestview Drive at Winchester Boulevard. However, these queues do not extend into the upstream traffic signals.

Also, existing AM and PM peak hour vehicular queue lengths in the left-turn pockets at major intersections along Pruneridge Avenue are shown Table 10. As shown in Table 10, the average queue lengths are mostly accommodated within the available storage length except at the intersection of Pruneridge Avenue and San Tomas Expressway. The analysis shows that at the Pruneridge/San Tomas intersection, the average queue lengths for the eastbound left-turn pocket on Pruneridge Avenue and the northbound left-turn pocket on San Tomas expressway exceed the available storage length during the AM peak hour under baseline pre-COVID conditions.

Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

14 The analysis shows that the maximum queue lengths would exceed the turn pocket lengths for most of the left turns at Kiely Boulevard, San Tomas Expressway, Saratoga Avenue and Winchester Boulevard intersections during the peak commute hours. Some of these queue lengths are due to the long queues in the adjacent through lane, which blocks access to the left-turn pockets at these intersections.

Signal Warrant Analysis
The level of service analysis for unsignalized intersections was supplemented with an assessment of the need for installation of a traffic signal, known as a signal warrant analysis. The need for signalization of unsignalized intersections in an urban or suburban context is typically assessed based on the Peak Hour Volume Warrant (Warrant 3) described in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways (CA MUTCD), Part 4, Highway Traffic Signals. This method makes no evaluation of intersection level of service, but simply provides an indication whether vehicular peak-hour volumes are, or would be, sufficiently high to justify installation of a traffic signal.

Signal warrant analysis was conducted for both AM and PM peak-hours at the unsignalized study intersections. None of the unsignalized intersections meet signal warrants during either peak hour under existing conditions. The peak-hour signal warrant sheets are contained in Appendix E.

Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

15 Table 8
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Intersection Levels of Service

# Intersection Control
Peak
Hour
A verage
Delay LOS
1 Pomeroy Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 19.5 B PM 18.8 B
2 Cronin Drive and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 6.8 A
PM 10.2 B
3 Pruneridge Avenue and Radcliffe Drive 1 OSWC AM 2.8 15.2 A C PM 1.3 16.2 A C
4 Woodhams Road and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 12.1 B
PM 12.7 B
5 Redwood Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue 1 OWSC AM 5.0 34.2 A D PM 4.0 27.2 A D
6 Kiely Boulevard and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 39.9 D PM 40.0 D
7 Tanoak Drive and Pruneridge Avenue 1 OWSC AM 2.2 30.1 A D PM 31.3 180.5 D F
8 San Tomas Expressway and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 82.5 F PM 75.6 E
9 Saratoga Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 39.0 D PM 34.8 C
10 Cypress Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 16.7 B PM 21.1 C
11 Los Padres Boulevard and Pruneridge Avenue 1 OWSC AM 2.5 9.8 A A PM 4.4 20.2 A C
12 Winchester Boulevard and Pruneridge Avenue Signal AM 28.9 C PM 45.7 D
13 Pomeroy Avenue and Forbes Avenue1 AWSC AM 13.1 B
PM 11.3 B
14 Woodhams Road and Forbes Avenue AWSC AM 7.7 A
PM 8.2 A
15 Kiely Boulevard and Forbes Avenue Signal AM 14.8 B
PM 18.8 B
16 San Tomas Expressway and Forbes Avenue Signal AM 33.9 C PM 15.1 B
17 Los Padres Boulevard and Forbes Avenue 1 AWSC AM 9.1 A PM 9.0 A
18 Pomeroy Avenue and Homestead Road Signal AM 51.9 D
PM 53.3 D
19 Woodhams Road and Homestead Road 1 OWSC AM 1.5 30.0 A D PM 1.6 33.6 A D
20 Kiely Boulevard and Homestead Road Signal AM 44.6 D
PM 52.8 D
21 San Tomas Expressway and Homestead Road* Signal AM 47.6 D PM 43.2 D
22 Los Padres Boulevard and Homestead Road Signal AM 24.2 C PM 24.1 C
23 Cronin Drive and Mauricia Avenue1 AWSC AM 7.9 A
PM 8.5 A
24 Woodhams Road and Mauricia Avenue 1 AWSC AM 7.5 A
PM 7.7 A
25 Kiely Boulevard and Mauricia Avenue 1 TWSC AM 2.9 33.5 A D PM 3.2 70.9 A F
Notes:
* denotes CMP intersection
1 For TWSC and OWSC, the Delay and LOS for the worst movement is shown in italics.

Bold indicates poor level of service
Existing Conditions
2 Intersection control type definitions: TWSC = Two-way-stop-con trol; OWSC = One-way-stop-control; AWSC = All-way-stop- control
LOS calculation reflects the existence of center turning lane on Homestead Road and Woodhams Road intersection.

Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

16 Table 9
Baseline (Pre-COVID) Queue Lengths on Pruneridge Avenue

Pruneridge Avenue Average Maximum Average Maximum
Pomeroy
Eastbound 20 280 200 1,340
Westbound 100 620 40 420
Cronin
Eastbound 0 160 20 280
Westbound 40 380 20 280
Woodhams
Eastbound 20 160 40 320
Westbound 40 400 20 240
Kiely
Eastbound 40 240 140 560
Westbound 160 640 60 380
San Tomas Expressway
Eastbound 60 280 640 1,360
Westbound 300 760 80 360
Saratoga
Eastbound 20 220 80 480
Westbound 100 500 40 200
Cypress
Eastbound 20 200 80 540
Westbound 40 260 20 160
Winchester
Eastbound 60 420 300 1,020
Westbound 40 200 40 180
AM Peak PM Peak
Queue Lengths (feet)
Santa
Clara
Pruneridge Ave
Saratoga Ave
Mauricia Ave
Lawrence Expy
Pomeroy Ave
Los Padres Blvd
Scott BlvdScott BlvdScott Blvd
N Winchester Blvd
Forbes Ave
Tanoak Dr
Kiely Blvd
San Tomas ExpwySan Tomas ExpwySan Tomas Expwy
Woodhams Rd
Homestead RdHomestead RdHomestead Rd
Benton StBenton StBenton St
Stevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek Blvd
Cronin DrCronin Dr
RedwoodRedwood
AveAve
RadcliffeRadcliffe
DrDr
Cronin Dr
Redwood
Ave
Radcliffe
Dr
Cypress Cypress
AveAve
Cypress
Ave
Monroe StMonroe StMonroe St
LEGEND
= Maximum Queue Lengths
= Average Queue Lengths
AM Peak Hour Queuing (ft)
Pruneridge Complete Streets
Figure 4
Baseline (Pre-COVID) AM Queue Lengths on Pruneridge Avenue ,....... ~[XAGON ........... 0
NORTH
Notto Scale
Santa
Clara
Pruneridge Ave
Los Padres Blvd
Scott BlvdScott BlvdScott Blvd
Forbes Ave
Tanoak Dr
Lawrence Expy
Pomeroy Ave
N Winchester Blvd
San Tomas ExpwySan Tomas ExpwySan Tomas Expwy
Saratoga Ave
Mauricia AveWoodhams Rd
Kiely Blvd
RedwoodRedwood
AveAve
Redwood
Ave
Cypress Cypress
AveAve
Cypress
Ave
Homestead RdHomestead RdHomestead Rd
Benton StBenton StBenton St
Stevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek BlvdStevens Creek Blvd
RadcliffeRadcliffe
DrDr
Radcliffe
Dr
Cronin DrCronin DrCronin Dr
Monroe StMonroe StMonroe St
LEGEND
= Maximum Queue Lengths
= Average Queue Lengths
PM Peak Hour Queuing (ft)
Pruneridge Complete Streets
Figure 5
Baseline (Pre-COVID) PM Queue Lengths on Pruneridge Avenue ,....... ~[XAGON ........... 0
NORTH
Notto Scale
Pruneridge Avenue Complate Streets – Baseline Conditions Analysis September 3, 2021

19 Table 10
Baseline (Pre-COVID - Left-Turn Pocket Queue Lengths

Storage
Length
Pruneridge Avenue (feet) Average Maximum Average Maximum Pomeroy
Eastbound Left-Turn 1 120 6 102 6 110
Southbound Left-Turn 1 250 11 81 16 92
Kiely
Eastbound Left-Turn 75 40 215 83 503
Westbound Left-Turn 75 44 543 52 346
Northbound Left-Turn 200 43 221 19 118
Southbound Left-Turn 130 25 160 62 402
San Tomas Expressway
Eastbound Left-Turn 1 150 195 493 73 237
Westbound Left-Turn 1 140 0 20 3 49
Northbound Left-Turn 250 586 1,660 58 226
Southbound Left-Turn 175 27 105 47 172
Saratoga
Eastbound Left-Turn 1 140 41 208 34 203
Westbound Left-Turn 145 143 499 29 164
Northbound Left-Turn 240 7 79 11 92
Southbound Left-Turn 230 8 74 15 108
Winchester
Eastbound Left-Turn 100 10 103 14 210
Westbound Left-Turn 1 250 11 95 36 179
Northbound Left-Turn 1 260 50 256 71 282
Southbound Left-Turn 1 150 4 72 15 171
Notes:
1 Queue longer than the storage length will be accomodated in the center turn lane.

Queue Lengths (feet)
AM Peak PM Peak

Pruneridge Avenue Complete Streets Project
- Working Paper #1
Technical Appendices

Appendix A: Peak Hour Traffic Counts
Appendix B: Average Daily Traffic Counts
Appendix C: Travel Time Run along Pruneridge Avenue
Appendix D: Intersection Level of Service Calculations
Appendix E: Signal Warrant Analysis

ppendix
Peak Hour Tra ic Counts

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
127 131
298
225
00 236
305

0.94 N
S
E W

0.84 0.91

0.00 0.88
(190)(194)
(526)
(341)
(531)
(342)
()()
69 0
58 62
236
0 0
167
69 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
4 3
13 2
N
S
E W
21 85
3 1
2 0
4 1
0 3
0 1
4 0
0 0
0 3
2 1
0 1
N
S
EW
4 0
1 2
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 4 00 2 17 1 0 26 60 1 1 1 04010109
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 4 00 3 16 0 0 49 99 0 0 2 049801 7 01 0 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 5 007 2 4 00 4 7 1 0 0 0 1 1 0566050 1 2 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 18 001 0 2 7 0 0 6 8 1 4 2 11 3 162801 4 0 5 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 16 001 5 3 8 0 0 5 8 1 5 7 10 3 066101 4 01 6 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 16 001 4 4 9 0 0 5 4 1 6 7 00 2 302 0 01 4 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 17 001 7 3 6 0 0 5 4 1 6 2 12 4 001 7 02 1 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 9 002 3 4 4 0 0 7 0 1 7 5 01 4 101 1 01 8 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 5 80 6 769 166 0 0 234 61 65500 0 0
Mediums 000 002010 021 600 0 0
Total 69 167 0 0 236 62 0 0 0 58 0 69 6610000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 2 CRONIN DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
00 284
203
5054
221
298

0.93 N
S
E W

0.00 0.89

0.66 0.81
()()
(502)
(306)
(524)
(331)
(76)(79)
0 0
0 0
266
18 36
185
0 0
0 032
0 18
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
6 8
14 0
N
S
E W
71 86
5 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
1 2
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 00 0 18 0 0 30 52 0 1 1 33540030
7:15 AM 0 5 0 0 0 00 0 17 0 1 57 86 0 0 1 34293030
7:30 AM 0 5 0 0 0 00 0 19 0 1 50 83 0 1 2 34916020
7:45 AM 0 6 0 0 0 000 4 0 07 7 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 65387010
8:00 AM 0 4 0 0 0 000 4 8 05 6 3 1 2 7 0 3 2 15555020
8:15 AM 0 10 0 0 0 000 5 7 03 6 5 1 4 8 0 3 3 411 0 2 0 8:30 AM 0 9 0 0 0 000 4 0 05 6 3 1 3 0 0 0 5 09040
8:45 AM 0 9 0 0 0 000 4 0 05 7 5 1 5 0 0 2 4 111 0 10 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 32 0 17 0 0 00 183 36 17 265 0 55000 0 0
Mediums 001 000020 110 500 0 0
Total 0 185 36 18 266 0 32 0 18 0 0 0 5550000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 3 WOODHAMS RD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
33 23
264
217
3519
197
270

0.99 N
S
E W

0.83 0.94

0.80 0.93
(33)(53)
(473)
(332)
(483)
(305)
(53)(36)
13 0
15 11
245
8 6
185
6 0
0 512
6 17
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
6 3
7 1
N
S
E W
12 34
3 3
1 0
3 0
0 1
1 0
3 0
0 1
0 4
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 3
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 24 0 3 35 70 2 0 0 33550221
7:15 AM 0 4 0 1 1 00 0 16 0 1 45 71 0 1 1 24161002
7:30 AM 0 2 0 0 5 10 0 24 0 1 50 95 0 0 0 24791254
7:45 AM 0 3 1 0 1 103 3 4 02 6 7 1 1 9 1 1 4 05165110
8:00 AM 0 2 2 0 3 302 4 2 01 6 6 1 3 1 0 1 1 15291432
8:15 AM 0 0 1 0 5 001 5 2 05 6 0 1 3 4 0 1 3 10262
8:30 AM 0 6 2 0 5 102 4 8 01 5 5 1 3 2 1 1 3 13324
8:45 AM 0 4 1 0 2 101 4 3 01 6 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 32265
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 12 6 17 15 5 136 183 5 8 243 11 52400 0 0
Mediums 000 000021 020 500 0 0
Total 6 185 6 8 245 11 12 6 17 15 5 13 5290000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 4 KIELY BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
207 258
257
237
269177
211
272

0.93 N
S
E W

0.88 0.90

0.86 0.80
(454)(370)
(447)
(367)
(471)
(327)
(473)(325)
29 0
33 38
205
14 18
169
24 0
0 14538
196
35 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
5 4
4 5
N
S
E W
31 13
3 2
3 2
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
2 0
0 1
0 3
0 1
N
S
EW
1 0
1 0
0 3
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 4 28 0 6 2200 1 8 03 2 8 1 2 8 0 0 0 16736751 7:15 AM 0 8 38 0 4 2403 1 8 03 3 7 1 5 6 1 0 0 37566843 7:30 AM 0 6 36 0 8 3004 1 7 07 3 0 1 6 1 0 1 0 08534865 7:45 AM 0 11 54 0 11 3506 2 9 03 5 2 2 2 8 2 0 1 0920544 1 4 8:00 AM 0 8 37 0 5 2807 3 3 01 6 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 294446 1 38 8:15 AM 0 13 50 0 8 4106 5 5 03 4 8 2 5 3 0 3 0 151 11 0 3 8:30 AM 0 7 48 0 9 4004 4 9 03 4 4 2 2 8 1 0 1 22958
8:45 AM 0 10 61 0 11 3607 3 2 07 5 2 2 5 2 4 1 1 071 2 71 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 1 0 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 38 189 34 32 141 2924 168 17 14 202 38 92600 0 0 Mediums 071 040011 030 1 700 0 0
Total 24 169 18 14 205 38 38 196 35 33 145 29 9440000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

TANOAK DR TANOAK DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 5 TANOAK DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
13 17
264
247
00 244
257

0.87 N
S
E W

0.75 0.92

0.00 0.82
(23)(26)
(456)
(395)
(450)
(386)
()()
3 0
10 11
253
0 0
237
6 0
1 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

TANOAK DR

TANOAK DR
3 0
3 0
N
S
E W
00 21
2 1
0 0
2 0
0 1
0 1
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
0 3
N
S
EW
0 2
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 2 00 1 29 0 0 40 74 0 0 1 03470200
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 2 00 0 27 0 0 50 80 0 0 1 03840001
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 00 0 35 0 0 45 84 0 0 3 24530201
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 2 000 5 0 00 5 2 1 0 9 1 0 1 04970104
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 4 001 4 3 00 6 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 05210000
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 3 003 7 1 00 6 9 1 4 9 0 0 0 00300
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 3 000 6 4 00 5 6 1 2 8 0 0 2 30302
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 012 5 9 00 6 5 1 3 3 0 0 1 00501
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 1 0036 234 0 0 250 11 51510 0 0
Mediums 000 000030 030 600 0 0
Total 6 237 0 0 253 11 0 0 0 10 0 3 5211000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 6 SAN TOMAS EXPY & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
727 866
216
214
827670
245
265

0.89 N
S
E W

0.77 0.89

0.91 0.83
(1,703)(1,235)
(379)
(327)
(456)
(393)
(1,630)(1,151)
43 3
85 93
123
0 74
123
48 0
0 59699
722
6 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
1 1
3 1
N
S
E W
01 12
0 1
0 1
3 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 1
0 4
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 12 124 0 4 8105 2 1 02 2 1 2 9 0 0 0 0 01,6224808 7:15 AM 0 21 218 0 5 10101 0 1 2 0 0 2 3 4 2 0 00 0 01,79281 3 0 9 7:30 AM 0 15 178 0 6 12201 1 1 9 0 2 3 2 4 2 1 00 1 01,87362 1 2 7 7:45 AM 0 12 220 0 20 13401 0 2 3 0 2 2 0 4 9 1 00 1 01,94219 19 1 11 8:00 AM 0 29 170 0 21 13507 1 8 00 2 5 4 6 0 0 0 0 02,01521 25 0 9 8:15 AM 0 21 199 0 16 11401 4 3 7 0 0 3 5 5 0 1 00 1 023 26 2 14 8:30 AM 0 26 165 2 26 14601 6 3 0 0 0 2 9 4 9 0 11 2 119 23 0 8 8:45 AM 0 23 188 1 22 20101 1 3 8 0 0 3 4 5 6 4 00 0 011 19 4 12 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 4 0 0 1 0000 000 500 0 0
Lights 98 712 6 85 590 4248 123 73 0 123 92 1,99500 0 3 Mediums 160 051001 001 1 500 0 0
Total 48 123 74 0 123 93 99 722 6 85 596 43 2,0150003
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 7 SARATOGA AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
248 232
246
250
253274
215
206

0.96 N
S
E W

0.90 0.93

0.80 0.81
(356)(436)
(433)
(378)
(361)
(325)
(399)(498)
36 6
14 13
158
75 3
163
49 0
0 19212
164
73 4

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SARATOGA AVE

SARATOGA AVE
2 1
1 9
N
S
E W
01 01
1 1
8 1
0 1
0 0
3 0
3 0
0 3
0 2
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 2
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 1 3 20 0 0 240 62 0 01 03 1 1 2 6 05 2 26310191 7:15 AM 4 3 22 1 1 320 61 1 01 32 3 1 3 4 03 1 1732044 1 0 7:30 AM 3 1 21 1 4 330 52 2 01 54 2 1 7 0 00 0 284701 1 48 7:45 AM 2 3 26 0 2 670 83 0 11 82 6 2 0 1 02 0 091222 1 04 8:00 AM 0 3 34 0 2 630 14 36 0 19 39 227 1 0 0 09620458 8:15 AM 3 2 50 1 2 510 93 3 02 14 2 2 4 9 30 0 113 2 47 8:30 AM 0 5 41 2 5 360 13 42 0 15 37 235 0 1 1 013 2 2 1 3 8:45 AM 1 2 39 3 5 420 13 52 0 20 40 251 5 0 0 113 2 28 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 1 0 3 0000 100 600 0 0
Lights 12 162 72 14 188 3549 161 3 73 155 13 94700 4 6
Mediums 010 011020 130 900 0 0
Total 49 163 3 75 158 13 12 164 73 14 192 36 9620046
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

CYPRESS AVE CYPRESS AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 8 CYPRESS AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
50 38
214
238
5133
237
243

0.94 N
S
E W

0.81 0.96

0.91 0.86
(59)(89)
(371)
(378)
(420)
(365)
(91)(59)
25 0
14 10
196
8 14
215
8 0
0 1122
20 9
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CYPRESS AVE

CYPRESS AVE
4 3
1 3
N
S
E W
30 01
3 1
3 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 2 0 0 40 1 18 0 1 28 67 0 0 0 03643122
7:15 AM 0 4 1 0 2 20 0 25 0 0 34 75 0 0 1 14181213
7:30 AM 0 8 2 0 5 300 3 1 03 4 9 1 1 0 1 2 6 04833132
7:45 AM 0 3 6 0 6 401 4 4 01 3 3 1 1 2 0 2 1 05171436
8:00 AM 0 5 4 0 3 500 3 8 02 4 7 1 2 1 1 2 0 15525318
8:15 AM 0 5 6 0 2 301 5 6 02 5 2 1 4 0 0 0 1 24225
8:30 AM 0 6 4 0 4 102 6 5 02 4 6 1 4 4 0 0 0 02345
8:45 AM 0 6 6 0 5 205 5 6 02 5 1 1 4 7 2 1 0 13227
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1010 000 200 0 0
Lights 22 20 9 14 11 248 212 14 8 193 9 54400 0 0
Mediums 000 000020 031 600 0 0
Total 8 215 14 8 196 10 22 20 9 14 11 25 5520000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 9 LOS PADRES BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
35 36
210
249
1412
243
205

0.85 N
S
E W

0.93 0.86

0.58 0.75
(57)(63)
(368)
(403)
(355)
(380)
(21)(17)
8 0
23 24
185
1 7
222
11 0
3 49
1 4
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
3 0
5 1
N
S
E W
00 05
2 1
1 0
3 0
0 0
0 1
3 0
0 0
0 1
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 3 00 0 22 0 0 30 60 2 0 0 03301111
7:15 AM 0 1 0 0 5 00 0 25 0 0 34 66 0 0 2 03760100
7:30 AM 0 1 1 0 10 00 0 29 0 0 49 97 0 0 0 24371600
7:45 AM 0 1 1 0 9 025 5 0 01 3 1 1 0 7 0 0 4 34612500
8:00 AM 0 2 1 0 9 023 3 4 00 4 9 1 0 6 0 0 1 15021410
8:15 AM 0 2 0 0 7 102 5 0 00 5 2 1 2 7 1 0 1 12911
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 2 114 6 3 01 4 2 1 2 1 0 0 0 10412
8:45 AM 0 5 0 0 5 202 7 5 00 4 2 1 4 8 0 0 3 04715
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 814 2 33811 219 7 1 181 23 49230 0 0
Mediums 100 010020 041 900 0 0
Total 11 222 7 1 185 24 9 1 4 23 4 8 5023000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WINCHESTER BLVD WINCHESTER BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 10 WINCHESTER BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
183 191
252
203
260305
231
227

0.79 N
S
E W

0.79 0.50

0.65 0.83
(387)(308)
(390)
(350)
(381)
(382)
(507)(469)
32 0
20 20
123
109
65 142
24 0
0 13172
147
41 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WINCHESTER BLVD

WINCHESTER BLVD
1 4
7 7
N
S
E W
13 34
0 1
3 4
3 1
0 1
1 0
4 1
0 1
0 2
0 2
2 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 4 21 0 3 2201 2 1 05 2 5 1 2 2 1 0 2 06616464 7:15 AM 0 6 19 0 3 1200 2 1 03 1 8 1 0 3 0 1 0 07375286 7:30 AM 0 15 105 0 5 280 23 0 01 12 8 2 4 6 31 1 08587366 7:45 AM 0 11 36 0 2 290 23 2 01 22 6 1 9 0 20 0 082324 1 10 5 8:00 AM 0 26 44 0 4 2704 1 9 06 3 2 1 9 8 2 0 3 092618 5 10 3 8:15 AM 0 20 35 0 3 470 33 4 01 03 2 2 2 4 22 1 117 5 10 8 8:30 AM 0 15 32 0 5 3207 4 9 08 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 014 6 9 11 8:45 AM 0 11 36 0 8 250 10 40 0 85 36 293 2 1 2 016 4 12 10 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 72 142 41 20 125 2823 142 64 109 121 20 90700 0 0 Mediums 050 064101 020 1 900 0 0
Total 24 142 65 109 123 20 72 147 41 20 131 32 9260000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
168 153
359
699
11 692
367

0.88 N
S
E W

0.84 0.92

0.25 0.84
(260)(284)
(692)
(1,146)
(691)
(1,121)
(1)(1)
79 0
89 71
288
0 1
609
82 0
0 00
0 1
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
7 6
50 9
N
S
E W
51 2921
4 3
7 2
0 3
0 3
2 3
6 0
0 0
0 7
1 5
0 3
N
S
EW
0 0
5 2
0 2
0 3
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 20 008 8 4 00 6 6 2 1 2 0 0 5 187802 1 01 3 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 13 001 1 8 4 0 0 5 5 1 9 0 12 8 196501 4 01 3 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 15 001 8 9 0 0 0 7 7 2 1 8 01 2 11,121080 1 0 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 21 001 4 1 2 0 0 0 7 9 2 5 8 14 7 01,21801 3 01 1 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 21 002 0 1 6 1 0 0 5 8 2 9 9 00 3 31,22001 9 02 0 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 20 002 0 1 8 6 0 0 7 4 3 4 6 44 1 6 302 5 12 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 25 002 4 1 4 2 0 0 8 2 3 1 5 31 1 6 011 6 02 5 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 23 001 8 1 2 0 0 0 7 4 2 6 0 21 1 5 101 1 01 4 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 001 8 90 7 982 607 1 0 287 71 1,21700 0 0
Mediums 000 000010 010 200 0 0
Total 82 609 1 0 288 71 0 0 1 89 0 79 1,2200000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 2 CRONIN DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
11 340
659
82106
701
358

0.89 N
S
E W

0.25 0.93

0.85 0.83
(2)(1)
(658)
(1,060)
(700)
(1,143)
(173)(213)
1 0
0 1
303
36 70
631
0 0
0 054
0 28
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
25 18
19 0
N
S
E W
810
118
11 14
0 0
3 0
0 0
3 0
4 0
1 0
2 3
0 4
5 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 3
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 21 0 0 0 001 8 5 06 7 1 2 1 3 0 3 5 685119 0 10 0 4:15 PM 0 11 0 0 0 000 8 2 06 5 6 1 8 0 0 5 7 291013 0 12 0 4:30 PM 0 10 0 0 0 000 7 8 07 8 0 2 0 3 1 5 7 21,04721 0 7 0 4:45 PM 0 9 0 0 0 000 1 3 5 09 8 3 2 5 5 0 6 6 61,12414 0 5 0 5:00 PM 0 10 0 0 0 000 1 5 4 09 6 9 2 7 2 0 3 4 1 01,12418 0 11 1 5:15 PM 0 16 0 0 0 000 1 8 4 09 7 5 3 1 7 0 4 4 327 1 5 0 5:30 PM 0 19 0 0 0 000 1 5 8 09 7 6 2 8 0 0 5 5 611 0 7 0 5:45 PM 0 10 0 0 0 000 1 1 7 09 8 3 2 5 5 0 7 5 826 0 10 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 54 0 28 0 0 10 630 69 36 302 1 1,12100 0 0
Mediums 000 000001 010 200 0 0
Total 0 631 70 36 303 1 54 0 28 0 0 1 1,1240000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 3 WOODHAMS RD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
50 46
333
629
5952
619
334

0.90 N
S
E W

0.96 0.94

0.77 0.86
(91)(89)
(659)
(1,022)
(652)
(1,016)
(106)(105)
16 0
20 24
299
10 28
583
8 0
0 1419
14 26
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
12 11
11 7
N
S
E W
92 56
3 9
6 1
3 1
0 0
3 1
3 0
0 2
0 1
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
0 1
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 2 2 0 4 203 8 0 05 7 4 1 8 6 1 2 3 38183434
4:15 PM 0 1 2 0 2 401 8 3 03 6 2 1 7 5 0 0 4 08957451
4:30 PM 0 6 2 0 3 401 9 8 02 8 1 2 1 6 0 2 3 11,0157723 4:45 PM 0 3 1 0 3 401 1 3 1 00 7 6 2 4 1 2 5 1 21,0614666 5:00 PM 0 6 3 0 9 200 1 5 6 06 6 8 2 6 3 1 1 1 51,0523532 5:15 PM 0 4 3 0 4 402 1 6 5 02 8 0 2 9 5 1 2 1 212 7 7 5 5:30 PM 0 6 7 0 4 405 1 3 1 02 7 5 2 6 2 3 3 8 396 1 03 5:45 PM 0 4 11 0 4 304 1 0 2 05 7 5 2 3 2 2 1 2 78475
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 19 14 26 20 14 168 583 28 10 299 24 1,06100 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 8 583 28 10 299 24 19 14 26 20 14 16 1,0610000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 4 KIELY BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
388 419
347
638
467379
608
374

0.95 N
S
E W

0.88 0.93

0.91 0.91
(756)(742)
(641)
(1,060)
(688)
(1,010)
(835)(724)
56 0
51 48
261
38 60
506
42 0
0 28157
329
81 0

PRUNERIDGE AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
6 12
2 8
N
S
E W
210
02 2 4
6 2
5 1
1 0
1 0
4 0
2 2
0 0
0 1
1 0
N
S
EW
5 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 11 72 0 18 650 66 8 01 15 1 3 5 0 11 0 01,43816 8 12 12 4:15 PM 0 11 63 0 19 6307 6 3 09 5 1 3 2 0 0 1 2 01,56213 4 12 5 4:30 PM 0 8 65 0 17 7008 6 9 08 5 7 3 4 7 0 2 0 01,71614 9 13 9 4:45 PM 0 18 82 0 8 7001 0 1 0 9 0 6 6 8 4 2 1 22 0 11,81091 91 01 2 5:00 PM 0 10 77 0 13 830 1 4 1 4 2 01 55 5 4 7 4 23 0 11,79014 9 28 14 5:15 PM 0 14 92 0 19 670 1 1 1 3 4 01 06 9 4 7 4 15 0 122 7 23 6 5:30 PM 0 15 78 0 11 6107 1 2 1 07 6 9 4 4 1 3 2 2 315 13 20 24 5:45 PM 0 18 73 0 8 500 1 0 1 1 3 01 16 3 4 0 1 12 2 215 12 10 18 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 0 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 57 324 81 51 278 5542 506 60 38 261 48 1,80100 0 0 Mediums 040 031000 000 800 0 0
Total 42 506 60 38 261 48 57 329 81 51 281 56 1,8100000 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

TANOAK DR TANOAK DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 5 TANOAK DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
26 41
401
662
00 652
376

0.93 N
S
E W

0.72 0.89

0.00 0.88
(63)(39)
(683)
(1,076)
(649)
(1,066)
()()
4 0
22 29
372
0 0
640
12 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

TANOAK DR

TANOAK DR
2 0
8 0
N
S
E W
00 62
2 0
0 0
3 1
0 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 1
1 4
0 1
N
S
EW
2 1
0 1
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 2 001 9 2 00 6 6 1 6 5 0 0 0 07090301
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 2 004 9 4 00 5 3 1 5 8 0 0 2 18340500
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 4 002 9 8 00 6 6 1 7 2 0 0 0 09560101
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 003 1 2 0 00 8 5 2 1 4 0 0 1 21,0590301 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 4 002 1 8 4 00 9 1 2 9 0 0 0 2 11,0790702 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 9 003 1 7 3 00 8 7 2 8 0 0 0 0 00800
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 6 002 1 5 3 00 1 0 5 2 7 5 0 0 3 10801
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 3 005 1 3 0 00 8 9 2 3 4 0 0 3 00601
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 2 20412 640 0 0 372 29 1,07900 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 12 640 0 0 372 29 0 0 0 22 0 4 1,0790000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 6 SAN TOMAS EXPY & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
1,545 1,085
379
579
1,0191,475
650
454

0.98 N
S
E W

0.93 0.91

0.92 0.88
(2,040)(2,918)
(674)
(958)
(744)
(1,063)
(1,865)(2,778)
106
2 145
167
198
14 168
408
74 0
0 1,292150
842
26 1

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
2 0
6 0
N
S
E W
00 33
2 0
0 0
3 0
2 0
0 2
1 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
2 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 19 164 2 32 27507 6 0 00 3 8 6 6 3 0 0 0 02,96623 26 4 13 4:15 PM 0 14 193 0 33 30902 1 5 2 0 3 3 5 7 2 8 01 1 13,20120 37 2 9 4:30 PM 0 18 207 1 31 28106 5 4 01 3 6 7 1 5 0 0 1 13,39336 27 4 13 4:45 PM 0 21 226 1 31 34701 1 6 2 0 3 5 4 8 6 0 00 1 03,59349 36 6 13 5:00 PM 0 16 230 0 39 28902 2 1 2 0 0 2 5 8 8 9 8 00 0 13,55446 44 8 24 5:15 PM 0 19 207 1 46 33102 4 1 2 4 0 1 4 0 9 2 0 00 3 034 47 10 36 5:30 PM 1 94 179 0 29 32501 7 1 0 2 0 8 4 6 9 1 5 00 2 139 40 2 33 5:45 PM 0 18 200 1 48 30002 3 5 6 0 0 5 2 8 2 1 00 3 155 40 3 25 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 3 0000 000 300 0 0
Lights 150 838 26 145 1,286 10674 408 168 14 198 166 3,58200 1 2 Mediums 040 030000 001 800 0 0
Total 74 408 168 14 198 167 150 842 26 145 1,292 106 3,5930012 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SARATOGA AVE SARATOGA AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 7 SARATOGA AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
365 484
375
621
506339
552
354

0.93 N
S
E W

0.95 0.84

0.90 0.89
(838)(712)
(701)
(1,089)
(637)
(937)
(888)(674)
65 14
33 18
281
76 6
422
123
0 1
2537
329
166
4 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

SARATOGA AVE

SARATOGA AVE
6 8
11 15
N
S
E W
71 65
2 4
9 6
2 0
3 0
2 2
2 0
1 4
0 0
1 2
0 0
N
S
EW
1 1
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 2 1 49 6 8 450 16 85 0 16 53 340 3 3 1 01,44017 3 7 1 4 4:15 PM 0 0 59 0 11 690 21 66 0 17 53 337 4 1 2 01,56403 2 5 1 3 4:30 PM 2 3 71 7 4 650 14 69 0 28 62 370 0 0 5 11,68009 2 2 1 4 4:45 PM 3 1 71 1 8 640 15 97 0 22 51 393 1 2 3 11,79415 3 6 1 8 5:00 PM 1 2 72 5 4 690 3 2 1 1 7 01 88 0 4 6 4 31 2 11,79803 3 9 2 2 5:15 PM 1 2 90 6 12 680 24 99 0 15 67 453 4 0 2 334 4 8 1 4 5:30 PM 1 1 92 1 9 511 3 8 1 1 4 02 77 8 4 8 4 34 2 128 4 6 1 5 5:45 PM 1 2 75 2 8 650 29 92 0 16 56 397 5 3 5 113 3 3 1 4 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 73 2 91 6 4 3 32 5 2 6 5122 422 6 76 281 18 1,79410 4 1 4 Mediums 002 010100 000 400 0 0
Total 123 422 6 76 281 18 7 329 166 33 253 65 1,798104 1 4 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

CYPRESS AVE CYPRESS AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 8 CYPRESS AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
70 63
356
591
6587
617
367

0.88 N
S
E W

0.88 0.86

0.83 0.88
(112)(117)
(661)
(1,003)
(679)
(1,057)
(111)(152)
24 0
15 19
320
16 40
563
14 1
0 3123
30 12
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

CYPRESS AVE

CYPRESS AVE
21 12
6 6
N
S
E W
111
51 10 11
4 2
2 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
0 1
1 0
0 4
1 2
N
S
EW
1 1
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 4 1 0 0 402 1 1 4 03 5 5 2 0 9 1 0 2 083811 5 5 5 4:15 PM 0 4 2 0 4 703 7 3 01 7 5 1 8 8 3 1 2 29446427
4:30 PM 0 3 5 0 3 404 9 6 06 8 1 2 2 2 3 1 2 31,04610 3 4 3 4:45 PM 0 6 7 0 0 508 1 0 8 03 6 4 2 1 9 4 1 2 41,0865535 5:00 PM 0 8 8 0 2 1005 1 6 2 05 9 0 3 1 5 3 7 3 31,1089826 5:15 PM 0 4 6 0 5 603 1 5 9 15 7 6 2 9 0 0 3 1 1 011 3 5 6 5:30 PM 0 10 6 0 2 805 1 2 5 00 8 0 2 6 2 2 0 2 612 4 5 5 5:45 PM 0 1 10 0 6 701 1 1 7 06 7 4 2 4 1 1 2 0 28407
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 23 30 12 15 31 2414 561 40 16 320 19 1,10601 0 0 Mediums 000 000020 000 200 0 0
Total 14 563 40 16 320 19 23 30 12 15 31 24 1,1080100
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 9 LOS PADRES BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
43 66
375
603
2012
596
353

0.93 N
S
E W

0.83 0.92

0.71 0.94
(129)(82)
(711)
(1,000)
(660)
(992)
(31)(27)
10 0
30 43
330
1 8
567
20 1
1 312
3 5
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
21 1
16 3
N
S
E W
10 115
6 15
1 2
3 0
6 1
2 0
0 0
1 1
0 2
0 5
0 5
N
S
EW
0 3
0 2
1 1
1 4
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 1 0 0 6 025 1 0 0 00 5 7 1 8 4 1 0 1 07823712 4:15 PM 0 1 0 0 7 101 8 8 01 7 4 1 9 0 0 0 1 386301 0 1 6 4:30 PM 0 0 3 0 7 004 8 9 03 8 3 2 0 6 0 0 2 795201 1 1 5 4:45 PM 0 2 1 0 2 106 9 4 12 7 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 01,00041 5 0 2 5:00 PM 0 2 0 0 6 014 1 5 1 00 8 9 2 6 5 1 0 3 51,0341722 5:15 PM 0 3 0 0 7 003 1 5 3 01 9 1 2 7 9 0 0 2 421 3 2 4 5:30 PM 0 3 0 0 8 105 1 4 3 00 7 8 2 5 4 0 1 5 82914
5:45 PM 0 4 3 0 9 208 1 2 0 10 7 2 2 3 6 2 0 6 431 4 0 0 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 12 3 5 30 3 1020 566 8 1 330 43 1,03311 0 0
Mediums 000 000010 000 100 0 0
Total 20 567 8 1 330 43 12 3 5 30 3 10 1,0341100
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WINCHESTER BLVD WINCHESTER BLVDPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 10 WINCHESTER BLVD & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
322 254
256
481
428490
575
356

0.96 N
S
E W

0.91 0.81

0.87 0.84
(505)(572)
(511)
(828)
(695)
(996)
(830)(881)
33 0
38 15
186
55 183
350
42 0
0 251137
197
93 1

PRUNERIDGE AVE

WINCHESTER BLVD

WINCHESTER BLVD
3 5
12 18
N
S
E W
32 48
2 1
12 6
2 2
2 0
3 1
2 0
0 3
0 4
0 2
0 2
N
S
EW
2 0
1 3
1 2
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 30 57 0 10 440 96 3 01 12 8 3 1 6 00 0 01,32837 0 15 12 4:15 PM 0 39 52 0 6 330 55 1 02 04 3 3 1 9 20 2 21,41638 2 22 8 4:30 PM 0 30 37 0 10 530 76 5 01 56 2 3 4 8 01 0 11,50428 10 22 9 4:45 PM 0 28 60 0 6 550 76 7 01 34 6 3 4 5 01 3 01,56844 5 10 4 5:00 PM 0 43 56 0 11 640 13 77 0 12 41 404 1 2 2 11,58145 6 24 12 5:15 PM 0 34 45 0 11 720 11 93 0 13 57 407 4 0 2 248 2 16 5 5:30 PM 1 28 54 0 8 520 1 1 1 1 3 01 64 3 4 1 2 70 6 049 3 25 9 5:45 PM 0 32 42 0 8 630 76 7 01 44 5 3 5 8 63 2 041 4 28 7 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 137 194 93 38 247 3342 348 183 55 186 15 1,57200 1 0 Mediums 030 040020 000 900 0 0
Total 42 350 183 55 186 15 137 197 93 38 251 33 1,5810010 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 11 POMEROY AVE & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
132 141
50 40
133125
16 25

0.90 N
S
E W

0.92 0.82

0.90 0.83
(216)(196)
(89)
(65)
(38)
(31)
(192)(189)
7 0
23 20
11 19
4 3
9 0
0 1027
112
14 0

FORBES AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
0 1
3 4
N
S
E W
10 30
0 0
3 1
2 0
3 0
0 1
2 0
1 1
1 1
0 1
0 3
N
S
EW
2 0
0 1
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 2 0 1 500 0 042 2 5 0 2 0 11774421
7:15 AM 0 0 18 0 3 801 0 021 3 6 0 2 0 22351110
7:30 AM 0 2 8 0 7 1101 2 042 4 6 1 1 3 12912511
7:45 AM 0 1 22 0 6 2002 0 012 7 0 2 0 1 332921 1 2 1
8:00 AM 0 0 23 0 6 2604 0 074 8 3 1 0 1 03311660
8:15 AM 0 3 30 0 9 2302 2 064 9 2 1 0 0 02344
8:30 AM 0 3 30 0 5 2702 0 052 8 4 2 1 1 00523
8:45 AM 0 1 29 0 3 2601 1 011 7 2 0 0 1 01620
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 7 112 14 23 102 693 3 1 8 1 1 2 0 3 2 800 0 0
Mediums 000 00100 1 10 0 300 0 0
Total 934 1 9 1 1 2 0 7 1 1 2 1 4 2 3 1 0 27 3 3 10000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 12 WOODHAMS RD & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM
15 21
33 22
2329
31 30

0.80 N
S
E W

0.80 0.67

0.82 0.89
(27)(31)
(51)
(43)
(50)
(51)
(34)(47)
2 0
2 2
24 7
11 16
4 0
0 114
15 4
0 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
4 1
4 1
N
S
E W
10 31
2 2
1 0
4 0
0 0
1 0
4 2
0 1
0 2
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
4 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 300 1 004 1 1 1 0 0 0650011
7:15 AM 0 0 1 0 1 300 4 011 1 2 2 2 0 2860001
7:30 AM 0 3 0 0 1 301 4 012 2 2 1 1 0 61014021
7:45 AM 0 1 1 0 0 200 6 016 2 0 1 2 3 31010210
8:00 AM 0 1 4 0 0 302 4 02 1 0 3 2 0 1 2 11023120
8:15 AM 0 0 5 0 0 301 4 016 2 7 0 0 1 03112
8:30 AM 0 2 4 0 1 200 5 005 2 2 0 0 1 33000
8:45 AM 0 1 2 0 1 301 3 043 2 1 1 0 0 02010
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 41 5 4 21 1 241 6 1 1 72 4 2 1 0 200 0 0
Mediums 000 00000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Total 4 16 11 7 24 2 4 15 4 2 11 2 1020000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 13 KIELY BLVD & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
217 258
54 45
267209
18 44

0.86 N
S
E W

0.90 0.69

0.76 0.61
(450)(369)
(87)
(80)
(70)
(43)
(463)(362)
18 0
9 22
16 16
3 15
0 0
0 19010
236
21 0

FORBES AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
3 2
3 3
N
S
E W
02 12
1 2
1 2
1 1
0 0
1 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
1 1
0 1
N
S
EW
1 0
1 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 29 0 1 2500 0 014 6 4 4 0 1 14061111
7:15 AM 0 1 50 0 3 3000 3 013 9 6 0 3 3 04643020
7:30 AM 0 0 49 0 3 3303 4 043 1 0 7 3 1 0 45030341
7:45 AM 0 4 51 0 4 5013 5 037 1 3 9 2 1 1 05342351
8:00 AM 0 5 42 0 2 3600 3 077 1 2 2 0 0 0 05560659
8:15 AM 0 3 57 0 1 4800 4 025 1 3 5 1 2 1 00564
8:30 AM 0 1 56 0 4 5400 4 023 1 3 8 2 0 0 33542
8:45 AM 0 1 81 0 2 5200 4 051 1 6 1 0 0 2 00663
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 000 0 00 0 100 0 0
Lights 10 232 19 9 185 180 15 3 16 16 22 54500 0 0
Mediums 042 04000 0 00 0 1 000 0 0
Total 0 15 3 16 16 22 10 236 21 9 190 18 5560000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 14 SAN TOMAS EXPY & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
691 885
79 49
864727
85 58

0.88 N
S
E W

0.76 0.80

0.90 0.75
(1,751)(1,168)
(152)
(76)
(106)
(146)
(1,704)(1,237)
20 1
14 25
22 32
37 19
28 0
1 65615
831
16 2

FORBES AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
3 0
6 0
N
S
E W
00 42
2 1
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 2
N
S
EW
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 2 136 0 2 85030 053 2 4 8 0 0 001,4514710
7:15 AM 0 3 238 1 2 105030 055 3 8 1 0 0 001,6015824
7:30 AM 1 2 204 0 2 121064 048 3 7 0 0 0 201,63610 5 2 1 7:45 AM 0 6 240 0 2 1470 1 07 099 4 5 2 0 0 001,6849535 8:00 AM 0 4 193 0 1 14905 4 0 1 07 3 9 8 0 0 0 01,71971 0 2 6 8:15 AM 0 2 231 0 5 129072 065 4 1 6 0 0 119866
8:30 AM 1 5 195 1 4 1591 1 06 085 4 1 8 0 0 2013 3 4 3
8:45 AM 1 4 212 0 4 219067 085 4 8 7 0 0 328445
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 4 0 0 1 0000 000 500 0 0
Lights 15 813 16 14 648 2027 18 37 32 22 25 1,69000 2 1 Mediums 01 4 0 0 7 0110 000 2 410 0 0
Total 28 19 37 32 22 25 15 831 16 14 656 20 1,7191021
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 15 POMEROY AVE & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
197 213
524
333
142131
333
519

0.92 N
S
E W

0.76 0.92

0.87 0.82
(304)(304)
(918)
(573)
(930)
(567)
(216)(198)
70 0
42 76
422
26 20
271
40 0
2 8525
97 20
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
3 4
0 2
N
S
E W
22 00
3 0
1 1
1 0
3 1
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 1
1 1
0 3
N
S
EW
1 0
0 1
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 1 2 0 3 20 3 38 0 3 72 135 0 1 2 18093215
7:15 AM 0 5 10 0 8 70 1 45 0 3 86 184 0 1 0 09431936
7:30 AM 0 5 8 0 3 150 7 60 0 1 106 233 0 0 1 01,066554 1 4 7:45 AM 0 6 22 0 12 172 8 56 0 5 88 257 0 1 0 21,12751 4 71 5 8:00 AM 0 8 21 0 12 151 7 67 0 6 96 269 0 2 0 01,19610 21 3 2 8:15 AM 0 2 28 0 4 231 17 61 0 6 114 307 0 1 0 122 2 62 1 8:30 AM 0 6 25 0 15 270 10 51 0 6 106 294 2 0 0 041 9 22 3 8:45 AM 0 9 23 0 11 200 6 92 0 8 106 326 0 1 0 241 4 92 4 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 04 0 600 0 0
Lights 23 97 19 42 85 6940 262 20 25 413 75 1,17220 0 0 Mediums 201 00008 0 15 1 1 800 0 0
Total 40 271 20 26 422 76 25 97 20 42 85 70 1,1962000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 16 WOODHAMS RD & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
01 433
351
6038
331
434

0.92 N
S
E W

0.00 0.94

0.75 0.79
(2)()
(774)
(606)
(774)
(591)
(84)(67)
0 0
0 1
411
21 17
314
0 0
0 023
0 37
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
6 0
4 0
N
S
E W
00 22
3 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
2 0
1 0
0 2
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 00 0 45 0 4 52 106 0 0 0 26252010
7:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 00 0 53 0 3 87 152 0 1 2 07375020
7:30 AM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 64 0 1 83 158 0 0 2 57873030
7:45 AM 0 7 0 0 0 00 0 83 1 6 103 209 0 0 2 28095130
8:00 AM 0 7 0 0 0 00 0 79 0 5 111 218 0 0 1 382430 1 30 8:15 AM 0 8 0 0 0 00 0 72 0 7 101 202 0 0 1 16080
8:30 AM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 65 0 3 97 180 0 0 2 11190
8:45 AM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 98 0 6 102 224 0 0 0 17070
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 001 0 04 0 500 0 0
Lights 2 30 3 5 0000 302 17 19 398 1 79500 0 0
Mediums 002 00001 1 0 2 9 0 2 400 0 0
Total 0 314 17 21 411 1 23 0 37 0 0 0 8240000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 17 KIELY BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
226 206
348
334
269220
354
437

0.86 N
S
E W

0.82 0.94

0.77 0.81
(354)(384)
(634)
(576)
(773)
(603)
(449)(367)
62 0
47 40
270
38 65
242
47 0
0 117105
119
45 0

HOMESTEAD RD

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
4 10
10 3
N
S
E W
37 37
1 3
2 1
0 0
2 0
1 1
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 14 0 6 170 5 34 0 4 42 152 1 2 4 2873681 1 0 7:15 AM 0 18 29 0 4 210 5 42 0 4 59 212 0 2 4 01,0035898 7:30 AM 0 14 25 0 6 210 9 52 0 8 61 230 0 3 6 01,09266 1 0 1 2 7:45 AM 0 14 27 0 3 3601 0 6 1 0 57 9 2 7 9 14 2 41,13014 2 14 14 8:00 AM 0 29 23 0 11 2001 0 5 7 0 87 4 2 8 2 15 1 11,19715 11 13 11 8:15 AM 0 24 33 0 13 210 12 62 0 16 62 301 0 2 5 219 10 12 17 8:30 AM 0 14 27 0 11 3901 0 4 7 0 46 9 2 6 8 00 1 113 8 7 19 8:45 AM 0 38 36 0 12 370 15 76 0 10 65 346 2 3 3 018 11 13 15 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 0 0 000 1 12 0 500 0 0
Lights 104 116 44 47 114 6245 234 60 36 259 40 1,16100 0 0 Mediums 031 03028 4 19 0 3 100 0 0
Total 47 242 65 38 270 40 105 119 45 47 117 62 1,1970000 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 18 SAN TOMAS EXPY & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
692 884
278
241
882688
397
436

0.89 N
S
E W

0.75 0.89

0.91 0.89
(1,774)(1,201)
(519)
(404)
(771)
(646)
(1,748)(1,165)
130
0 20
35 197
46 100
175
121
0 1
542108
728
46 0

HOMESTEAD RD

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
9 2
3 0
N
S
E W
20 30
6 3
0 0
2 1
1 0
1 0
4 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
N
S
EW
2 0
0 0
0 1
0 2
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 11 124 0 1 7001 7 2 2 1 5 3 1 3 3 0 00 3 01,86512 4 11 21 7:15 AM 1 12 212 0 7 810 21 25 0 19 38 494 0 0 0 02,05711 16 25 26 7:30 AM 0 18 193 0 2 1040 36 21 0 12 37 483 0 0 0 02,13281 5 43 3 7:45 AM 0 26 222 0 5 1230 23 32 0 10 46 558 0 0 0 02,17621 7 7 36 8:00 AM 0 28 173 0 3 1130 29 34 0 10 59 522 0 0 0 02,24933 4 7 29 8:15 AM 0 26 207 0 3 1020 33 54 0 12 45 569 0 2 1 325 8 13 41 8:30 AM 0 26 171 0 7 13612 9 3 6 0 9 4 3 5 2 7 00 0 321 10 10 28 8:45 AM 0 28 177 0 7 1910 30 51 0 15 50 631 0 0 2 321 13 16 32 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 1 3 0 0 2 0100 000 700 0 0
Lights 106 714 45 20 537 125119 166 100 45 188 34 2,20010 0 0 Mediums 11 1 1 0 3 5190 191 4 200 0 0
Total 121 175 100 46 197 35 108 728 46 20 542 130 2,2491000 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 19 LOS PADRES BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
90 71
194
216
5958
218
216

0.94 N
S
E W

0.87 0.92

0.80 0.81
(121)(156)
(352)
(348)
(392)
(343)
(111)(101)
26 1
22 12
177
5 12
181
25 0
0 4113
33 13
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
6 2
2 5
N
S
E W
11 02
2 4
2 3
0 1
1 0
4 0
0 0
1 5
0 0
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 4 0 2 40 2 21 0 1 27 69 1 1 0 04010102
7:15 AM 0 1 5 0 3 50 4 23 0 1 40 93 0 0 0 04760335
7:30 AM 0 1 10 0 4 140 2 31 0 0 33 103 0 1 1 05223014
7:45 AM 0 4 8 1 2 120 4 32 0 0 46 136 0 1 2 054736 1 08 8:00 AM 0 5 12 1 5 1401 1 3 3 0 05 2 1 4 4 12 1 05611226 8:15 AM 0 4 7 0 5 80 1 50 0 2 45 139 0 0 0 15264
8:30 AM 0 3 7 0 3 90 4 45 0 2 35 128 4 0 0 2162 1 1
8:45 AM 0 1 7 0 9 100 9 53 0 1 45 150 0 0 1 35235
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 13 32 12 22 40 2523 174 10 5 167 11 53500 0 1
Mediums 011 01127 2 0 1 0 1 2 600 0 0
Total 2 5 1 8 11 2 5 1 7 71 2 1 33 31 3 2 24 12 6 5 6 10001 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 20 CRONIN DR & MAURICIA AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
44 46
11 13
2832
33 25

0.73 N
S
E W

0.73 0.55

0.78 0.55
(70)(65)
(20)
(20)
(31)
(47)
(42)(53)
18 0
1 5
4 2
4 8
20 0
1 252
21 4
1 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
10 9
6 11
N
S
E W
45 24
5 5
4 7
0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 101 0 000 4 1 1 4 0580100
7:15 AM 0 0 5 0 0 202 0 011 1 5 0 0 2 0711102
7:30 AM 1 0 3 0 0 501 2 010 1 7 1 2 2 0800310
7:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 903 4 001 2 2 1 4 0 1980002
8:00 AM 1 1 3 0 1 301 3 000 1 7 3 1 1 01160112
8:15 AM 0 0 5 0 0 613 1 001 2 4 3 2 3 21114
8:30 AM 0 1 7 0 0 905 2 022 3 5 3 2 1 31114
8:45 AM 0 0 6 0 0 701 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 24 1 52218
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 1 0 0 000 0 00 0 100 0 0
Lights 12 0 2 12 41 820 8 3 2 3 4 10700 1 0
Mediums 111 01000 1 01 1 810 0 0
Total 20 8 4 2 4 5 2 21 4 1 25 18 1161010
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 11 POMEROY AVE & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
202 177
62 76
154172
33 26

0.87 N
S
E W

0.81 0.82

0.82 0.69
(294)(350)
(106)
(136)
(50)
(54)
(260)(290)
15 0
40 35
8 19
6 12
15 0
0 1473
127
24 0

FORBES AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
13 15
19 11
N
S
E W
114
136
9 4
6 5
5 0
4 6
12 0
3 3
0 7
0 5
0 5
0 8
N
S
EW
5 0
1 4
2 10
8 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 2 23 0 5 3201 3 032 8 7 3 4 3 23191654
4:15 PM 0 2 19 0 12 2604 2 034 8 3 1 0 7 13440722
4:30 PM 0 1 21 0 7 1502 4 030 6 8 3 0 1 13902652
4:45 PM 0 1 20 0 9 3001 1 030 8 1 1 5 5 64310754
5:00 PM 0 0 35 0 12 3401 4 0 1 02 1 1 2 1 0 6 24511742
5:15 PM 0 2 39 0 14 4405 1 012 1 2 9 8 2 4 32964
5:30 PM 0 1 32 0 5 3507 3 041 1 0 9 1 1 0 6 221 0 6 3
5:45 PM 0 0 21 0 9 3402 4 043 1 0 1 1 3 3 61986
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 3 127 24 40 147 1515 12 6 19 8 35 45100 0 0
Mediums 000 00000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Total 15 12 6 19 8 35 3 127 24 40 147 15 4510000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 12 WOODHAMS RD & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:45 PM - 06:00 PM
41 38
39 51
5049
58 50

0.85 N
S
E W

0.81 0.81

0.66 0.76
(58)(69)
(77)
(96)
(93)
(101)
(90)(90)
11 0
3 3
28 8
14 38
6 0
0 2711
29 10
0 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
21 10
23 9
N
S
E W
82 158
17 4
5 4
2 0
1 0
4 0
2 4
1 4
0 4
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
2 0
0 4
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 3 5 0 0 610 6 039 4 1 1 0 4 31494130
4:15 PM 0 4 2 0 2 300 9 029 3 6 0 3 2 51571130
4:30 PM 0 2 4 0 1 303 8 043 3 9 0 2 5 61654142
4:45 PM 1 5 2 0 1 700 6 022 3 3 1 2 4 51661123
5:00 PM 0 2 8 0 1 603 1 1 017 4 9 2 0 8 51885023
5:15 PM 0 2 5 0 1 502 1 2 026 4 4 2 2 8 36102
5:30 PM 0 2 7 0 1 800 4 018 4 0 2 1 1 81134
5:45 PM 0 5 9 0 0 801 1 1 047 5 5 3 7 6 52152
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 11 29 10 3 27 1053 7 1 3 82 8 2 1 8 300 0 0
Mediums 000 00111 1 00 1 500 0 0
Total 6 38 14 8 28 3 11 29 10 3 27 11 1880000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 13 KIELY BLVD & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
427 387
51 123
422390
36 36

0.92 N
S
E W

0.86 0.76

0.99 0.71
(718)(799)
(109)
(208)
(80)
(94)
(761)(757)
14 0
48 20
14 17
8 20
8 0
0 3658
359
55 0

FORBES AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
11 9
2 10
N
S
E W
63 20
7 4
6 4
0 1
3 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
0 6
0 5
3 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 6
3 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 1 77 0 9 10004 6 028 2 2 8 2 1 0 08454764
4:15 PM 0 3 65 0 2 7201 9 036 1 8 3 1 2 0 087132 1 16
4:30 PM 0 0 81 0 5 940 4 10 0 4 5 215 0 2 0 59215232
4:45 PM 0 0 89 0 10 8302 4 025 2 1 9 3 3 0 093625 1 43
5:00 PM 0 2 92 0 15 10502 6 054 2 5 4 4 3 1 191816 1 24 5:15 PM 0 4 88 0 11 9003 6 042 2 3 3 0 2 1 242 1 54
5:30 PM 0 2 90 0 12 8701 4 063 2 3 0 3 1 0 817 1 43
5:45 PM 0 2 80 0 7 7003 7 086 2 0 1 0 3 6 025 1 01
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 100 0 0
Lights 8 356 53 48 361 148 20 8 17 14 20 92700 0 0
Mediums 022 04000 0 00 0 800 0 0
Total 8 20 8 17 14 20 8 359 55 48 365 14 9360000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 14 SAN TOMAS EXPY & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
1,517 1,039
81 109
1,0431,529
135
99 0.97
N
S
E W

0.92 0.72

0.97 0.87
(1,920)(2,872)
(130)
(180)
(172)
(249)
(1,941)(2,920)
42 2
31 30
24 27
56 38
41 0
0 1,44233
966
40 4

FORBES AVE

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
5 0
6 1
N
S
E W
00 33
5 0
1 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
0 5
0 3
0 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 5
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 2 5 200 0 2 303067 067 5 6 3 0 0 012,41610 3 7 5 4:15 PM 3 6 214 1 2 3270 1 14 055 6 1 7 0 0 012,51720 3 3 13 4:30 PM 1 5 214 0 3 314059 010 5 8 2 0 0 212,61310 2 11 7 4:45 PM 1 5 211 0 6 365097 078 6 5 4 0 0 002,72716 2 10 7 5:00 PM 0 4 258 0 7 32601 0 1 1 0 1 0 6 6 6 4 00 0 02,77616 2 7 7 5:15 PM 2 9 231 0 10 3940 1 87 051 7 1 3 1 0 2214 6 9 7 5:30 PM 1 6 236 0 6 371087 037 6 9 6 0 0 1213 13 15 10
5:45 PM 1 14 241 2 8 35105 1 3 09 1 0 7 0 3 0 0 3 113 9 9 18 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 33 962 40 31 1,441 4241 38 56 26 24 30 2,77000 4 2 Mediums 040 000000 100 500 0 0
Total 41 38 56 27 24 30 33 966 40 31 1,442 42 2,7760042 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 15 POMEROY AVE & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
247 250
542
710
180201
722
530

0.91 N
S
E W

0.88 0.88

0.85 0.92
(416)(423)
(1,005)
(1,320)
(1,021)
(1,355)
(304)(330)
64 0
57 77
432
33 42
618
59 0
3 12631
114
35 0

HOMESTEAD RD

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
3 13
5 8
N
S
E W
49 41
2 1
4 4
4 1
12 0
2 0
11 0
2 4
0 0
0 6
1 7
N
S
EW
4 0
0 0
0 2
7 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 10 10 0 14 181 17 148 0 4 79 352 4 3 4 21,40213 15 5 18 4:15 PM 0 3 18 0 11 180 9 122 1 4 116 355 1 0 1 11,48013 10 11 19 4:30 PM 0 4 23 0 7 100 13 136 0 5 96 334 3 4 1 01,59041 0 81 8 4:45 PM 0 7 18 0 14 252 14 134 0 5 91 361 4 2 3 01,69191 9 71 6 5:00 PM 0 3 34 0 15 341 13 155 0 11 106 430 1 4 0 11,68513 22 11 12 5:15 PM 0 12 33 0 15 370 19 155 0 11 128 465 0 5 1 011 18 8 18 5:30 PM 0 9 29 0 13 300 13 174 0 6 107 435 3 2 1 291 8 91 8 5:45 PM 0 7 21 0 7 210 10 136 0 8 105 355 1 3 0 211 10 4 15 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 1 0 001 0 00 0 200 0 0
Lights 31 114 35 56 126 6459 612 42 33 428 77 1,68030 0 0 Mediums 000 00005 0 04 0 900 0 0
Total 59 618 42 33 432 77 31 114 35 57 126 64 1,6913000 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 16 WOODHAMS RD & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
23 589
667
7099
659
551

0.93 N
S
E W

0.50 0.84

0.83 0.94
(5)(3)
(1,073)
(1,271)
(1,015)
(1,255)
(120)(160)
2 0
0 2
532
55 44
614
1 0
0 017
0 53
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
35 1
14 0
N
S
E W
10 104
20 15
0 0
1 0
0 0
0 0
3 1
3 0
0 9
0 11
2 0
N
S
EW
1 0
0 9
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 4 0 0 0 000 1 4 2 15 9 6 2 6 8 0 0 7 31,13191 1 00 4:15 PM 0 4 0 0 1 00 0 142 0 6 117 285 0 0 0 01,21510 0 5 0 4:30 PM 0 7 0 0 0 00 0 137 0 15 111 280 0 0 4 21,2831180 4:45 PM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 147 3 7 121 298 0 0 4 51,3178080 5:00 PM 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 161 0 14 146 352 0 1 5 151,32015 0 12 1 5:15 PM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 147 0 9 167 353 0 0 0 890 1 70
5:30 PM 0 5 0 0 0 00 1 160 0 14 111 314 0 0 1 713 0 9 1 5:45 PM 0 5 0 0 0 00 0 146 0 18 108 301 0 0 8 572 1 50
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 1 70 5 1 0021 611 43 53 530 2 1,31000 0 0
Mediums 002 00003 1 22 0 1 000 0 0
Total 1 614 44 55 532 2 17 0 53 0 0 2 1,3200000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 17 KIELY BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM
506 433
480
638
417423
661
570

0.97 N
S
E W

0.96 0.97

0.91 0.93
(825)(990)
(885)
(1,194)
(1,060)
(1,265)
(801)(862)
118
0 114
92 350
38 111
456
94 0
0 274102
247
68 0

HOMESTEAD RD

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
11 28
22 10
N
S
E W
1414
814
3 8
3 7
5 2
1 0
2 2
6 0
0 0
1 4
1 5
5 0
N
S
EW
4 1
1 3
1 1
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 21 61 0 21 930 24 105 0 9 64 475 2 5 1 01,90231 10 14 22 4:15 PM 0 20 54 0 13 7202 1 9 5 1 78 4 4 4 0 23 3 01,96023 19 7 24 4:30 PM 0 26 56 0 28 670 23 97 0 14 74 475 1 8 4 52,03226 21 16 27 4:45 PM 0 26 65 0 26 720 23 101 0 7 78 512 7 13 7 32,06429 28 24 33 5:00 PM 0 25 67 0 32 820 25 116 0 11 91 533 2 6 9 42,03928 22 13 21 5:15 PM 0 32 55 0 28 660 27 103 0 9 95 512 1 7 2 130 19 14 34 5:30 PM 0 19 60 0 28 540 19 136 0 11 86 507 0 2 4 324 23 17 30 5:45 PM 0 29 65 0 32 610 20 112 0 9 75 487 0 7 6 527 18 15 24 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 002 0 00 0 200 0 0
Lights 101 244 67 113 272 11893 449 110 38 346 92 2,04300 0 0 Mediums 131 12015 1 04 0 1 900 0 0
Total 94 456 111 38 350 92 102 247 68 114 274 118 2,0640000 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

SAN TOMAS EXPY SAN TOMAS EXPYHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 18 SAN TOMAS EXPY & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
1,554 1,034
320
453
1,0371,547
626
503

0.95 N
S
E W

0.93 0.94

0.96 0.94
(1,914)(2,948)
(583)
(801)
(967)
(1,165)
(1,921)(2,935)
166
2 46
36 217
67 139
297
189
0 1
1,340119
807
110
1 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

SAN TOMAS EXPY

SAN TOMAS EXPY
6 1
6 0
N
S
E W
10 42
3 3
0 0
9 3
2 0
3 0
7 0
1 0
0 6
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
4 5
0 6
2 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 1 22 181 0 6 2660 35 56 1 12 39 712 0 0 1 03,08041 3 8 41 4:15 PM 1 35 180 1 11 3061 39 69 0 17 46 790 0 0 2 43,22829 5 13 37 4:30 PM 0 22 184 0 5 2810 30 56 0 17 39 730 0 0 1 33,36533 9 14 40 4:45 PM 0 35 167 0 17 3300 39 71 0 14 54 848 0 0 3 03,51040 7 21 53 5:00 PM 0 23 215 0 11 2961 51 75 0 14 59 860 0 0 1 13,53733 11 32 39 5:15 PM 0 36 191 0 16 3640 44 81 0 14 61 927 0 1 1 137 10 28 45 5:30 PM 0 31 201 2 9 3490 42 63 0 22 44 875 0 0 1 133 5 25 49 5:45 PM 1 29 200 0 10 3310 52 78 0 17 53 875 0 0 3 336 10 25 33 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 119 804 110 46 1,339 166188 293 139 67 213 36 3,52410 1 2 Mediums 030 000140 040 1 200 0 0
Total 189 297 139 67 217 36 119 807 110 46 1,340 166 3,5371012 atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD (303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 19 LOS PADRES BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
149 140
293
358
90117
391
308

0.97 N
S
E W

0.87 0.89

0.88 0.90
(273)(269)
(540)
(633)
(565)
(682)
(185)(205)
41 0
25 17
257
19 15
316
60 0
0 8310
63 17
0 HOMESTEAD RD

HOMESTEAD RD

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
8 10
7 9
N
S
E W
64 43
2 6
6 3
0 0
8 0
8 0
5 0
0 6
0 4
1 4
4 5
N
S
EW
0 0
0 4
3 5
5 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 2 20 0 6 140 5 54 0 7 47 165 2 3 0 17534411
4:15 PM 0 2 17 0 4 2101 2 6 5 0 45 7 2 0 0 02 0 08214149 4:30 PM 0 4 13 0 5 120 7 50 0 1 62 183 2 3 3 0860295 1 3 4:45 PM 0 2 24 0 9 1601 5 7 1 0 14 8 2 0 5 58 0 3911261 1 0 5:00 PM 0 2 13 0 6 2101 0 9 7 0 56 5 2 3 3 13 3 09232246 5:15 PM 0 2 16 0 4 2201 4 8 7 0 46 7 2 3 9 51 2 1354 1 1 5:30 PM 0 3 15 0 9 2502 3 5 7 0 56 8 2 3 4 31 2 44979
5:45 PM 0 3 19 0 6 1501 3 7 5 0 55 7 2 1 7 05 0 3612 1 5 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 10 63 17 25 82 4060 312 15 19 252 17 91200 0 0
Mediums 000 01104 0 05 0 1 100 0 0
Total 60 316 15 19 257 17 10 63 17 25 83 41 9230000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

CRONIN DR CRONIN DRMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 20 CRONIN DR & MAURICIA AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
112 92
24 29
5077
64 52

0.92 N
S
E W

0.82 0.67

0.75 0.79
(172)(205)
(48)
(51)
(103)
(102)
(107)(136)
39 0
9 12
10 2
10 17
37 0
0 643
43 3
1 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

CRONIN DR

CRONIN DR
24 23
18 20
N
S
E W
149
99 10 14
10 10
3 7
6 0
4 1
2 0
0 4
0 2
4 1
0 5
N
S
EW
3 0
0 2
0 4
5 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 14 0 1 1308 2 012 6 1 1 1 0 52122459
4:15 PM 0 0 11 0 1 1105 2 013 5 1 2 3 4 42150539
4:30 PM 0 3 11 0 1 1605 2 002 5 2 4 9 4 82322109
4:45 PM 0 1 8 0 2 1106 2 003 4 8 6 4 5 6235221 1 0
5:00 PM 0 1 11 0 3 1201 2 5 0 1 2 6 4 42 9 7250421 1 0
5:15 PM 0 0 8 0 1 1809 5 012 6 8 6 6 5 1 0361 1 4
5:30 PM 1 1 10 0 1 1401 3 3 0 0 4 5 5 66 1 42015
5:45 PM 0 1 14 0 4 2003 4 002 6 3 4 9 3 3140 1 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Lights 34 3 3 96 43 937 17 10 2 10 12 25000 1 0
Mediums 000 00000 0 00 0 000 0 0
Total 37 17 10 2 10 12 3 43 3 9 64 39 2500010
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 21 WOODHAMS RD & MAURICIA AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
18 29
16 13
1519
21 9

0.83 N
S
E W

0.79 0.53

0.67 0.66
(48)(33)
(27)
(18)
(20)
(29)
(29)(32)
1 0
1 10
5 1
2 9
10 0
0 163
9 3
0 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
9 5
13 7
N
S
E W
23 85
5 4
4 3
0 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 1
0 0
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 2000 000 3 0 0 11500000
7:15 AM 0 1 2 0 0 1000 001 1 0 2 0 20591202
7:30 AM 0 2 2 1 0 3012 021 1 6 0 1 10651100
7:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 5025 002 2 1 2 0 10701120
8:00 AM 0 0 1 0 0 4021 000 1 2 0 0 43681300
8:15 AM 0 1 2 0 0 4032 010 1 6 4 1 520111
8:30 AM 0 2 3 0 1 3031 003 2 1 1 4 340500
8:45 AM 0 0 6 0 1 2012 011 1 9 1 2 270203
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 393 1 1 5110 9 2 1 4 10 6800 0 0
Mediums 000 010000 010 200 0 0
Total 10 9 2 1 5 10 3 9 3 1 16 1 700000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 22 KIELY BLVD & MAURICIA AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:45 AM - 09:00 AM
182 268
33 21
251184
28 21

0.88 N
S
E W

0.88 0.63

0.84 0.78
(473)(339)
(61)
(31)
(35)
(44)
(439)(344)
3 0
16 27
2 4
17 1
10 0
0 16316
231
4 0

MAURICIA AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
4 3
0 5
N
S
E W
12 00
0 4
1 4
0 0
2 0
3 0
0 0
0 3
0 0
0 1
0 2
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 3
2 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 2 1 31 0 4 25000 010 7 3 1 0 003892601
7:15 AM 0 3 42 0 0 35020 010 9 2 1 0 014251611
7:30 AM 0 3 43 0 2 43010 000 1 0 5 1 2 014545512
7:45 AM 0 2 59 0 2 42020 001 1 1 9 0 0 034723800
8:00 AM 0 3 46 0 4 32040 011 1 0 9 3 0 0149421 2 3 1
8:15 AM 0 2 62 0 3 43021 000 1 2 1 1 1 015201
8:30 AM 0 4 56 0 6 45010 011 1 2 3 1 2 014401
8:45 AM 0 7 67 0 3 43030 020 1 4 1 0 0 016910
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 16 222 4 16 158 310 1 17 3 2 27 47900 0 0
Mediums 090 050000 100 1 500 0 0
Total 10 1 17 4 2 27 16 231 4 16 163 3 4940000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

RADCLIFFE DR RADCLIFFE DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 23 RADCLIFFE DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
98 269
190
21 199
280

0.89 N
S
E W

0.65 0.90

0.75 0.82
(11)(18)
(475)
(287)
(496)
(300)
(4)(3)
9 0
0 0
269
0 1
189
8 0
1 01
0 1
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

RADCLIFFE DR

RADCLIFFE DR
6 0
14 0
N
S
E W
00 86
3 3
0 0
2 1
0 0
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 3
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
2 0
1 2
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 21 0 0 26 47 0 0 0 03180000
7:15 AM 0 1 0 1 0 01 0 19 0 0 56 79 0 0 2 33840001
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 21 0 0 50 73 0 0 0 34390002
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 001 3 6 00 7 3 1 1 9 0 0 0 24742105
8:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 004 4 3 00 6 3 1 1 3 0 0 2 04790002
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 011 5 9 00 6 9 1 3 4 0 0 4 30004
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 000 4 4 00 6 2 1 0 8 0 0 4 00002
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 003 4 3 00 7 5 1 2 4 0 0 4 31011
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 001 0097 187 0 0 267 0 47210 0 0
Mediums 100 000121 020 700 0 0
Total 8 1 8 91 0 2 6 90 101 009 4 7 91000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

REDWOOD AVE REDWOOD AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 24 REDWOOD AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 08:15 AM - 08:30 AM
01 273
217
2431
214
262

0.94 N
S
E W

0.25 0.91

0.67 0.82
(1)(1)
(477)
(329)
(467)
(324)
(39)(44)
0 0
0 1
251
19 12
202
0 2
0 011
0 13
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

REDWOOD AVE

REDWOOD AVE
12 1
8 0
N
S
E W
10 35
6 6
0 0
3 0
0 0
0 0
4 0
0 0
0 5
0 4
0 0
N
S
EW
3 0
1 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 00 0 23 0 0 33 60 0 0 0 33301020
7:15 AM 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 23 0 2 48 79 0 0 2 34001011
7:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 00 0 28 0 2 47 83 0 0 0 34572020
7:45 AM 0 1 0 0 0 000 3 0 02 7 0 1 0 8 0 1 2 24932030
8:00 AM 0 2 0 0 0 000 4 6 14 7 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 15113130
8:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 000 6 2 04 6 3 1 3 6 0 0 3 43020
8:30 AM 0 2 0 0 0 000 4 8 16 5 6 1 1 9 0 0 3 12040
8:45 AM 0 5 0 0 0 000 4 6 05 6 2 1 2 6 0 1 2 64040
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 11 0 13 0 0 00 200 12 19 248 1 50602 0 0
Mediums 000 000020 030 500 0 0
Total 0 202 12 19 251 1 11 0 13 0 0 0 5110200
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 25 LOS PADRES BLVD & FORBES AVE AM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:45 AM - 08:45 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:45 AM - 08:00 AM
59 55
27 16
6386
60 52

0.93 N
S
E W

0.93 0.75

0.83 0.88
(80)(103)
(42)
(23)
(85)
(93)
(99)(149)
11 0
6 4
16 7
37 10
13 0
0 4225
38 0
0 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
4 12
8 6
N
S
E W
84 26
4 0
2 4
1 0
0 0
4 0
1 0
0 4
0 1
0 1
0 0
N
S
EW
1 0
0 1
1 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 5 3 0 0 2011 002 2 0 0 1 201411113
7:15 AM 0 4 5 0 0 6000 113 2 5 0 0 311752201
7:30 AM 0 4 3 0 0 16031 012 4 0 1 0 212049001
7:45 AM 0 7 8 0 3 11061 016 5 6 0 1 112098203
8:00 AM 0 7 12 0 1 12024 024 5 4 0 3 121968002
8:15 AM 0 9 9 0 2 8034 024 5 4 2 5 417204
8:30 AM 0 2 9 0 0 11021 022 4 5 4 3 2014 0 0 2
8:45 AM 0 7 4 0 0 15023 001 4 3 1 4 1010 1 0 0
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 25 38 0 6 41 1013 10 37 7 16 4 20700 0 0
Mediums 000 011000 000 200 0 0
Total 13 10 37 7 16 4 25 38 0 6 42 11 2090000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

WOODHAMS RD WOODHAMS RDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 21 WOODHAMS RD & MAURICIA AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
62 62
29 37
5039
22 25

0.67 N
S
E W

0.70 0.58

0.60 0.65
(106)(101)
(51)
(63)
(47)
(48)
(94)(78)
11 0
23 12
11 6
5 6
11 0
0 283
39 8
0 MAURICIA AVE

MAURICIA AVE

WOODHAMS RD

WOODHAMS RD
23 9
15 14
N
S
E W
72 96
14 9
6 8
4 0
1 0
3 0
7 0
0 3
1 9
3 4
0 0
N
S
EW
4 0
1 8
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 6 0 3 6025 003 3 3 3 5 331313023
4:15 PM 0 0 10 0 2 7010 016 3 3 0 0 151243111
4:30 PM 0 1 5 0 1 6014 011 2 5 0 2 941170221
4:45 PM 0 2 11 0 2 6030 023 4 0 2 2 8 1 21534241
5:00 PM 0 0 5 0 3 6040 011 2 6 5 0 351632013
5:15 PM 0 1 5 0 2 3021 003 2 6 2 1 581503
5:30 PM 0 0 17 0 13 8004 044 6 1 2 4 161541
5:45 PM 0 2 12 0 5 11051 013 5 0 5 4 641234
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 33 9 8 2 32 81 111 6 5 6 11 12 16300 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 11 6 5 6 11 12 3 39 8 23 28 11 1630000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

KIELY BLVD KIELY BLVDMAURICIA AVEMAURICIA AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 22 KIELY BLVD & MAURICIA AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
368 455
49 67
447330
35 47

0.90 N
S
E W

0.91 0.69

0.93 0.67
(854)(732)
(94)
(108)
(73)
(61)
(818)(670)
18 0
49 41
5 3
24 2
9 0
0 30124
405
16 2

MAURICIA AVE

KIELY BLVD

KIELY BLVD
8 5
0 13
N
S
E W
23 00
3 5
10 3
1 2
1 0
4 0
1 1
0 3
0 0
1 0
0 0
N
S
EW
0 1
0 0
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 3 90 0 5 87041 010 2 0 8 6 3 048064724
4:15 PM 0 1 77 0 7 79000 001 1 8 7 0 0 048319931
4:30 PM 2 3 85 0 13 85011 003 2 1 1 0 1 0189331 3 0 2
4:45 PM 0 4 101 0 9 68010 000 2 0 0 2 3 0189521 1 0 4
5:00 PM 1 4 104 0 7 94030 000 2 3 3 8 1 038994826
5:15 PM 1 6 109 0 14 85020 012 2 4 9 1 3 0241 7 4 4
5:30 PM 0 8 98 0 11 64020 002 2 1 3 0 0 017966
5:45 PM 0 6 94 0 17 58022 021 2 0 4 4 1 029742
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 1 0 0 0 0000 000 100 0 0
Lights 24 400 16 49 297 1892 2 4 35 4 1 8 9 000 2 0
Mediums 040 040000 000 800 0 0
Total 9 2 24 3 5 41 24 405 16 49 301 18 8990020
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

RADCLIFFE DR RADCLIFFE DRPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 23 RADCLIFFE DR & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:15 PM - 05:30 PM
11 28
336
641
31 659
339

0.92 N
S
E W

0.60 0.89

0.50 0.90
(44)(19)
(650)
(1,022)
(656)
(1,053)
(6)(6)
8 0
3 6
330
0 1
635
22 0
1 00
0 3
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

RADCLIFFE DR

RADCLIFFE DR
23 0
29 1
N
S
E W
00 1415
10 13
1 0
4 4
0 0
0 0
2 0
0 0
0 3
1 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 1
0 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 002 8 1 00 7 2 1 5 9 0 0 3 57192101
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 004 9 4 01 6 2 1 6 7 0 0 2 38141102
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 003 9 1 00 8 1 1 7 7 0 0 3 19200002
4:45 PM 0 1 0 0 2 003 1 1 3 01 9 3 2 1 6 0 0 5 29900201 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 017 1 6 9 00 7 1 2 5 4 0 0 6 1 01,0091211 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 006 1 7 8 00 8 7 2 7 3 1 0 3 10002
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 2 004 1 5 3 00 8 3 2 4 7 0 0 6 50113
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 00 5 135 0 0 89 235 0 0 14 70312
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0010 000 100 0 0
Lights 003 30822 634 1 0 330 6 1,00810 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 22 635 1 0 330 6 0 0 3 3 0 8 1,0091000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

REDWOOD AVE REDWOOD AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 24 REDWOOD AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:45 PM - 05:45 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
12 363
627
2653
631
339

0.95 N
S
E W

0.50 0.88

0.83 0.88
(2)(2)
(676)
(1,021)
(656)
(1,023)
(55)(77)
1 0
0 1
328
34 19
611
1 0
0 010
0 16
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

REDWOOD AVE

REDWOOD AVE
18 1
13 0
N
S
E W
10 67
9 9
0 0
4 0
0 0
4 0
6 0
4 0
0 3
0 5
0 0
N
S
EW
3 1
1 2
0 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 6 0 0 0 000 8 2 01 7 4 1 6 8 0 2 0 37383020
4:15 PM 0 2 0 0 0 000 8 3 11 6 2 1 5 8 0 0 4 08287020
4:30 PM 0 3 0 0 0 000 9 1 01 7 9 1 8 4 0 0 0 29375041
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 001 1 2 9 04 8 9 2 2 8 0 0 2 21,0211031 5:00 PM 0 3 0 0 0 000 1 6 3 04 8 1 2 5 8 0 0 4 71,0182050 5:15 PM 0 3 0 0 0 00 0 170 0 10 71 267 0 0 0 59130
5:30 PM 0 4 0 0 0 00 0 149 0 16 87 268 0 1 7 47050
5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 000 1 2 0 05 8 9 2 2 5 0 1 4 71090
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 10 0 16 0 0 11 611 19 34 328 1 1,02100 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 1 611 19 34 328 1 10 0 16 0 0 1 1,0210000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

LOS PADRES BLVD LOS PADRES BLVDFORBES AVEFORBES AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 25 LOS PADRES BLVD & FORBES AVE PM
Thursday, February 25, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 05:00 PM - 06:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 05:30 PM - 05:45 PM
90 91
25 23
117128
71 61

0.91 N
S
E W

0.83 0.65

0.86 0.81
(172)(166)
(44)
(37)
(110)
(119)
(216)(226)
9 0
2 7
14 4
43 16
12 0
0 7938
72 5
2 FORBES AVE

FORBES AVE

LOS PADRES BLVD

LOS PADRES BLVD
6 24
27 17
N
S
E W
1212
1512
3 3
12 5
0 1
9 0
0 0
0 0
1 5
1 1
0 1
7 7
N
S
EW
0 0
0 1
0 0
7 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 1 6 18 0 1 16031 006 6 7 3 1 202428025
4:15 PM 0 7 20 0 2 14021 002 5 4 7 4 1 022444002
4:30 PM 0 4 12 0 2 17021 031 5 6 2 7 5026512 1 0 1
4:45 PM 1 11 17 0 1 14033 003 6 5 8 2 1 242928301
5:00 PM 1 5 15 0 1 18014 004 6 9 6 4 6230312 3 2 3
5:15 PM 1 8 18 0 0 19033 011 7 5 6 5 1 0216 1 2 2
5:30 PM 0 12 19 0 0 26053 027 8 3 3 9 707101
5:45 PM 0 13 20 0 1 16036 012 7 6 2 6 428213
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 37 72 5 2 78 912 16 42 4 13 7 29900 2 0
Mediums 100 010001 010 400 0 0
Total 12 16 43 4 14 7 38 72 5 2 79 9 3030020
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE AM
Saturday, February 27, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 07:00 AM - 08:00 AM
Peak 15-Minutes: 07:00 AM - 07:15 AM
00 0
0 00
0 0

0.00 N
S
E W

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
()()
()
()
()
()
()()
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
0 0
0 0
N
S
E W
00 00
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
5 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 000 000 000 000 00000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

POMEROY AVE POMEROY AVEPRUNERIDGE AVEPRUNERIDGE AVE
(303) 216-2439
www.alltrafficdata.net
LLocation: 1 POMEROY AVE & PRUNERIDGE AVE PM
Saturday, February 27, 2021Date:

Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates
Peak Hour - Motorized Vehicles Peak Hour - Bicycles Peak Hour - Pedestrians Traffic Counts - Motorized Vehicles
Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses.

Peak Hour: 04:00 PM - 05:00 PM
Peak 15-Minutes: 04:00 PM - 04:15 PM
00 0
0 00
0 0

0.00 N
S
E W

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
()()
()
()
()
()
()()
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 00
0 0
0 PRUNERIDGE AVE

PRUNERIDGE AVE

POMEROY AVE

POMEROY AVE
0 0
0 0
N
S
E W
00 00
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 0
8 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
N
S
EW
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Left Thru Right Total
EastboundInterval
Start Time
Rolling
Hour West East South North
Pedestrian Crossings
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 00 00000
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 0 0 0 000000
Vehicle Type Left Thru Right
Eastbound
U-Turn
Westbound Northbound Southbound
TotalLeft Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeft Thru RightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0000 000 000 0 0
Lights 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Mediums 000 000000 000 000 0 0
Total 000 000 000 000 00000
atd

ALL TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
- ....
_J L
t I .:,J I l. l,L I t
..1 ~ -
- r
1 't'I , t re: 1
7 ...,___I - -

ppendix B
erage aily Tra ic Counts

Page 1 ends

City Council and Authorities ConcurrentAugust 30, 2022

City Council and Authorities Concurrent
August 30, 2022