Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Morteza Shafiei
f>UJ~Ja-• ✓l¼o· 4u-,·
Signature: ____ c,~1] ______ _
Address: 1721 Triton CT. Santa Clara CA 95050 Date: Sep-7-2022 Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because :
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months . It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents . The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes ' living areas . There will be noise from cars and fire trucks . The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor . CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown . • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots . Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood . The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking . There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars . Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow . A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better . The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the develope r to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan . We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighbo rhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property . We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor . The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home . The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible .
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases . The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing . CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children 's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems . Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents . We need CH to have contiguous parks , not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither . It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing .
Sincerely,
Printed Name: /OAlc:q .J 11J iA-o
I
Signature: ~ c?Jz-v
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f . MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime , blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas . There will be noise from cars and fire trucks . The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor . CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots . Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking . There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents , requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. 0 Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5 -story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood . · CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan' . As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan . We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis .
• Financial Impact: The '1601 ' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood . CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down . Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home . The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit , and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing . CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners .
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders . This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing publ ic parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks , not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: X, Y\ 3 h~°' \-\o.V\ Signatu~ ~ ~
Address: I g4-3 l-t1 \\ebrcw1t ~L ):;\vrtG\ C.\q~ CA1'5rf;o Date: q IL q I 2-oz.2-- Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: c/to,1)Xv 2Ac~;)
Address: /llf4 H,1/e kt>""t JJl Date: 7 I I 7 / )o2 1,, Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Yoyi'ni} 0
Address: (7J:y I~, //e trr)"t Pf
I
'-7. ~1'11 V1") U ~ L-iJ
Signature: ----1--· -~·~-------
/
Date: __ c;_· _
1 _1 7~1_' 2✓_1, }_t,._
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.
Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The' 1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Address:
Sincerely, (\~
Printed Name: M \ ~~ \,r~ Signature: V\ c:~~
f\'-\ 1(\\ ·,\\_l)\,~ "( ~e• 9 / \] 12 2.
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
r-,\ ~ .. \_;J\ Printed Name:~----- Signature: \~ '--"" Address: __ -¼·\f\j_~ \\ ~\~J\ri'l'hA, "\
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: :::::,vV-1'-f ~ 11.- \->i 0 µ0~1:-.J~ Signature: _ 4 ...-J.,====~=------- Date: 0 '"1 / 1, } 2 - -z_
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPO, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Signature:
·v1 ~rt
¼ \
)
Date: 9 l ) , I I )
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center.
Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbo'rs during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Z \A,Y) cQ_ \ Signature: J,1 ;{/v\JL: , · Address: , J 1 >""' /i 1
1 ~ e/?tWf\{ ) 5M-tR C<'.W:[A I c4 Date: 4 / { 1 / )fl l L.
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: __,_)1;\...........,,&'--..... C"""'Ja ..... ~_,.__ __ _ Address: / 7 rJ H l / (ehtl1tl:£
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely, -#'A n ..._
Printed Name: .,-, I LO !,Af EV/ A Signature: .?'~ /
Address: J ft)1- µ I L.1,,~~ I?~ T fl- S />rh ·-rA- C- ~ Date: v/ IT/ 1--v- , q .i.1>5V I I
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: _~_...1_~_..___vM-'--'--'-....;;.c"Vl _ __,(J Address: I :[D 'l--
Signature: _4
H-1Lll?f?Pfh?T p1,,- S11-vi,-A UA--AA Date: q / ):f: /,z,1,, tf !;""050 I I
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name:~ I'-'- t. t,_;JJfl/;Vl A Signature: ---"----_a-+>-------<~/.
Address: l'hi-- H-1 t..--lkt; )M:V'I Pl::S:A-vir:8 UAft--A 1ro5V
Date: 1 1--:::r / 1..--z,.,
I I
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing. ~c,.,._., 1,-\.l \.\,o..-<L ~
Printed Name: ~ Signature:-~----------
Sincerely,
Address: __ \;_:7_-4_~ __ \*_" _\ \_C2.._b_'{""_~_'6_i'\_:\-_Q_L ______ Date: 9 ·- \ 1 ·- "L-L ~ ~~ ~~'--- cJ\
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight. nuisance , and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandal ism have skyrocketed . CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny ttiis, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible .
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing . CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders . This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: 7l'/Jl.,f1XI ~
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Address:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely, ~
Printed Name:f,trnn'.l/,1,lill\ Cbti'\ Signature: ~-
'. .. . , 1 , ~o.to
Address: jcp.o Hr/&brarr t f()a,drJ{lrt; C4oate: Vn/2022 Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: ~ '' t/( (1 Vf L
1 1
1/1
Address: /1 )l l·/:!l2br:Jv-il 'FL
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: No,.; "f..i'v,.
I
l ->
Signature: / 12 .. ---/·v ~...,·-
Address: /i SL. /.-/.'lt~hr01--.f ~fv?J L&,,..f) (4 °s·.,1qoate: _4 ....... lr ....... n_/ ___ ·2-o __ 2-_1..._ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Sl\w1Ank. r"' b~
Address: 114 L Rt! kb>'A tat r L
<2J.
Signature: -~•/'"""·11v-~ ..... l½: _______ _
Date: (JC{ J 11 / 202.- L i
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely, . . , , \ '\) i ,
Printed Name Fy\i Cc \-1 b, b&-~h, ·~ Signature\\k~
. 9 -- C) 1\ 1) ' P' (/ c·\I ~ i Address: \ SV\ ·t,') 1.e /1§C,,./'\'1 : ,,. 2l~h, h . .. {AOC.- Date: (_Q f 1·1 lL Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: V 1~kL sJ j
Address: /°] g,' t\J [ \e ~ 1 C( ~'-~
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities • Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601' . CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch . There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed . CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood . CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor . The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan :::~::~:::d ;~ :~:~:ic
1 ;,::•ive :i::~~e~De;~ l ~-Housing.
Address: 1106 /-/t'tldr04f et, SC. CA9Sofct>at~: 1/;z/2°22 r .
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before den~~ housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners. I
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HQ As complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from :
existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green. · We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Signature: -~=r ___ """"'~=----'-+------
Address: 1710 Hillebrant PL, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Date: 09/22/2022 Printed Name: Menghui Wang
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost . assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Tianxin Wang Signature:/~ u)~
Address: 1710 Hillebrant PL, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Date: 09/11/2022 Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.
Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety : The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes ' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed . CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.
Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood . CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders . This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: /;)J,eA:- l,, eJ,1/Mc
Address: 1
1 "\'V\' - ld:(.l:e,bratnK PL
Sig nature: __.,,_1 A...,.k..-,,µ,.Al.,.,LMAu.=vf.,_1-'-\.. ____ _ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing {abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely, J (
Printed Name: 41 :ccc:trlOM Signature: __ ft .... ~ ......... __ d;!_~---(yl LJ l J l )fj r - ,J,--/)} o /:A / UJ I 7 fl "Z-,7..---Address: l ~ ~ M I j r;~y~ d Date: _-_ l __ f/V_ ~~Cft1~vZJD
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: S-hi,itA. z~~j Signature:
Address: /~31 1-/i'//el»,-o.wl f(, Sawl'-.- tfaw..j Gt\ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: ~ Ct I'\ D~ I'.) g Signature:
Address: l1]C~(lt,h~1v PlaCR I S"&b±1
er~~
LA, 1~W
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: ( kSS Ct V\ ~ VI\_ M.~ le
Address: \ 11 \ ~ A I <l:,vi,w-, t' 'f l 4- O.
S ~ t( Cl~YA_ Oft,
Signature: _Ch ______ NZ_l.__~_._L __
Date: $ff !9 l J_oz__u
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Xu.AA ~h,u Signature: _,/2 _ _,__.,, ....... /Jh~-~----- Address: I 13t Hlllel,tl,!N;
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0. 72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Ho~v{l(vt>{ /1o C,l
Address: /f?/4 Ht/I ebtI~<\_t f/.
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
llA Printed Name: ____ A_C/JV ------- Signature:_ lft~_---, __ Address: ---1\-u.-i~-~~\,._\tLLl~Rhlv1 fl i )Cttif°' C (,W\ 1 (/,I Date: __ oj / 1_7---'-/_J_·, 2--_) Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents . The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks . The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor . CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown . • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan' . As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood . CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases . The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems . Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green .
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: __,~,__lA_N_~~L¼'V ___ f _iM_· ~- Signature: __ 1_ ·-1) f-~_.f _~J+-'~1 ~ '-L.._ ___ _ PL1 Sw,-t-D\ c(c,..,i;.., (.,/>,, Date: 2ol2 /oj I 1 7
"I Sl>5°
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs com plain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
l,1 OtD :J, /2-<:...-_.)
__,)
Printed Name: XJO")~\A ~ --Signature: _,,,,,-·
I-\ : l \e b r M ni PL
7 D'l / 13' / ~-o?,) Address: I 1 ?·~ Date:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct. 's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPn, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
B,~u:r Lan Printed Name: Signature:_ Ji;.~_~ __ 7 __ _
Address:~ ij- H-,'llebrovit fl Date: 0 7 I I J / Z
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: lnou. Sb~ Signature: __ ~"""------·--
Date:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: __ 1_\\~ ___ LJ_'v1 ___ _ ~ Signature: __________ _ Address: ( l C) \ (, ~vtt CV'\-\]1 olx, ~lv<\-U. °'°"~ Date:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because :
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank) . CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents . The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots . Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed . CH refuses to build underground parking . There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents , requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow . A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood . CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible .
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners .
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children 's park and guest parking are used by outsiders . This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems . Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither . It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: ~ J &a,U6j;, Signature: ~.._ ~
Address:/ 7t?3U/ll~~ .&lvkf&tJAM
7 Cit Date : ~~22-
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because :
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months . It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents . The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks . The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown . • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood . The curbs are filthy , there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic , car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed . CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents , requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan' . As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood . CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible .
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing . CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners .
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children 's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems . Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents . We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither . It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90d8 noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: Ly d : C\ M , ' -;of-----......_ __ _ Signature:.di12 Date: <j- 1-2-,Dl L
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed.
CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project. Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Printed Name: _Zhihui Landau _____ _ Signature: _Zhihui Landau_ Address: _ 1707 Civic Center Dr, Santa Clara, CA 95050 ___ Date: _09/11 /2022 __ _ Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: --.,]___,_,.....,C ..... l{ __ ...,.¥t;:µ_ ...... c: ..... :)_ Signature: ___ /4,..__~--l-...... 1..,..;J..___~---04 i Address: /Jo tj Cut<. Ce0f-:-e1,, (Y1
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: 0k~a~ ~ Sig nature:.,;~
Address: l )11 u,'u~v ~~ ~ . Date: &f / t~ I µ)-2-
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.
Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Develo ment by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: $1\j:B::i A ~H At1
Address: _l~J..+l ...... ;, ____ ct ....... V ...... l=-L---....C~ ...... N'-"--"-'T(Dl..........__D~R=----- Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.
Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
PrintedName: RAJA:N SHETH Signature:_~,._...__-~.:;...;..----- Address: l]l3 tlV(l Lf;:NTE&, DIC Date: Ol}-1 Z- 2.Q2 Z, Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
• Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. • Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car. • Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
• Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: ----------
1:Y"'J ~ ~
Signature: 6.,,~ L.,.,0 ::-:::X
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601 '. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct's fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown.
Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow will worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car.
Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan is better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate.
Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood .
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners.
Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: {jJ/ 1lf::r'/M'J /P,,Jf..[
Date:
Petition to Oppose Charity Housing's High-Density Development on 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, CA
We concerned residents are strongly opposed to the high-density rental development by Charities Housing (abbreviated CH) at 1601 Civic Center Drive, Santa Clara, because:
., Safety: The developer ignored the safety of our neighborhood for 13 months. It refused to fence it and took no action to remove the homeless encampment on '1601'. CH now denies the problems on their property occurred (c.f. MND response E-6 on City website) even though SCPD made them aware of the petty crime, blight, nuisance, and dumping (including a septic tank). CH refuses to remove the proposed driveway on the west side of '1601' and to block access along Triton Ct.'s fence. There are already 3 streets feeding traffic onto Civic Center Drive in a narrow stretch. There is a high risk of pedestrian/ traffic incidents. The proposed street is only 12 feet from Triton Ct. homes' living areas. There will be noise from cars and fire trucks. The new access lane will increase the risk of dumping & petty criminal activity because it is hard to monitor. CH prefers to place the cost and burden of monitoring on neighbors and the enforcement on SCPD, as it did during the lockdown. .. Grossly Inadequate Parking: The project proposes a ratio of 0.72 per unit or 82 spots. Parking overflow wm worsen the congestion in our neighborhood. The curbs are filthy, there is no parking after 6pm, delivery and service vehicles block traffic, car break-ins and vandalism have skyrocketed. CH refuses to build underground parking. There is not enough EV stations on the street or the project.
Not all residents are likely buyers of EV cars. Public transportation is not widespread or reliable enough to serve the residents, requiring each working adult to own a non-EV car . ., Shadow Impact: The 5-story building will block. sunlight and views from several homes on Triton Ct. and cast a significant shadow. A 30 degree angle considered in the ECR Specific Plan js better. The shadow study presented to the Planning Commission was inaccurate. • Density: A 5-story building with 108 units is too high, dense and not a good fit for our neighborhood.
CH shrewdly opted out of the ECR Specific Plan to avoid objective standards contemplated in the 'Plan'. As a Planned Development (PD), the City has the authority to ask the developer to conform to more stringent standards than the ECR Specific Plan. We ask that the project plan reflect any changes made on an on-going basis.
• Financial Impact: The '1601' project has been a huge cost burden to the City and neighborhood. CH goes to great length to deny this, but it imposed enforcement and monitoring costs on the City and lost business and sleep time on its neighbors during the lock down. Please take note of publicized problems at Renascent Place in SJ, a CH property. We have a pattern of CH not being a good neighbor. The 90dB noise during construction will make it difficult to earn an income from home. The mitigation against dangerously high toxic fumes during construction is inadequate, if not impossible.
Longer term this project will worsen the City's structural deficit, and will require more public resources as private rents increases. The sewer, power and water infrastructure is old and there is no cost assessment. Infrastructure has to be updated before dense housing. CH needs to disclose the financial interest of its limited partners .
., Project burdens local private amenities: Residents of Catalina and Boulevard HOAs complain that their private children's park and guest parking are used by outsiders. This project does not provide its own amenities and will exasperate such problems. Existing public parks do not satisfy demand from existing residents. We need CH to have contiguous parks, not patches of green.
We believe in sustainable and balanced development. The proposed project is neither. It does not have the internal controls that enable it to be so. We urge you to Vote NO on the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1601 Civic Center Drive to Planned Development by Charities Housing.
Sincerely,
Printed Name: I\\ \GE- M anC:C)?O
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above. 05/25/2022
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA C
LARA, CA 95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
-MITH UN
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:35 PM
G0.01B
05/25/2022
1927400
SHEET INDEX
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUS
ING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
SHEET INDEX - GPA SUBMISSION
Sheet Number Sheet Name
GENERAL
G0.00 COVER SHEET
G0.01B SHEET INDEX
G0.02 PROJECT INFO
G0.03 GREEN POINT RATED CHECKLIST
G0.04 GREEN BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
G1.01 SITE & SURROUNDING AREA PHOTOS
G1.02 RENDERINGS, COLORS & MATERIALS
G1.03 RENDERINGS
G1.04 FIRE ACCESS DIAGRAM
G1.05 PARKING PLAN
G1.07 UNIT COUNTS
G2.00A GROSS AREA CALCS
CIVIL
C1.01 EXISTING CONDITIONS
C1.02 SITE PLAN
C2.01 GRADING PLAN
C2.02 GRADING SECTIONS
C3.01 UTILITY PLAN
C4.01 STORMWATER CONTROL PLAN
C4.02 STORMWATER CONTROL NOTES & DETAILS
C4.03 STORMWATER CONTROL CALCULATIONS
JOINT TRENCH
JT-1 JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET
JT-2 JOINT TRENCH COMPOSITE
JT-3 JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
L1.0 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 1
L2.0 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 2
L3.0 EXISTING TREE PLAN
L4.0 SUPPLEMENTAL LANDSCAPE EXHIBITS
ARCHITECTURE
A1.01 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
A2.01 LEVEL-1
A2.02 LEVEL-2 PODIUM
A2.03 LEVEL-3-4
A2.05 LEVEL-5
A2.06 ROOF PLAN
A3.01b BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.02b BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.03b BUILDING ELEVATIONS
A3.11 BUILDING SECTIONS
A3.12 BUILDING SECTIONS
A8.50 ENLARGED PLANS -TRASH ROOM AND CHUTES
ELECTRICAL
E0.01 LEGEND, SYMBOLS, GENERAL NOTES & DRAWING LIST
E1.01 SITE PLAN - LIGHTING
E1.02 PODIUM LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - LIGHTING
E1.03 SITE PLAN - POWER
E3.01 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND - POWER
E5.01 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
PLUMBING
P0.01 LEGEND, SYMPOLS, GENERAL NOTES & DRAWING LIST
-
I Ml THUN
IBCH IJI.ITIUHOV:$1NG
}--
~
I
I
I
I
I
C
PROJECT TEAM
OWNER
CHARITIES HOUSING
1400 PARKMOOR AVE #190
SAN JOSE, CA 95126
CONTACT: KATHY ROBINSON
[email protected]
ARCHITECT/INTERIOR DESIGN
MITHUN, INC.
660 MARKET STREET, SUITE 300
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104
415.489.4855
CONTACT: KRISTEN BELT
[email protected]
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
FORMWORK LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
2585 UNIVERSITY AVE,
SAN DIEGO, CA 92104
619.269.4423
CONTACT: MIKE VAIL
[email protected]
CIVIL
HMH ENGINEERS
1570 OAKLAND RD
SAN JOSE, CA 95131
408.487.2200 X5636
CONTACT: ZEFERINO JIMENEZ
[email protected]
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
IDA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS
1629 TELEGRAPH AVE #300
OAKLAND, CA 94612
510.834.1629 X 102
CONTACT: STEPHEN DEJESSE
[email protected]
MECHANICAL ENGINEER
GUTTMAN & BLAEVOET
2351 POWELL ST.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
415.655.4057
CONTACT: JEFF BLAEVOET
[email protected]
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
GUTTMAN & BLAEVOET
2351 POWELL ST.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
707.523.3010 x 311
CONTACT: VICTOR STEFFEN
[email protected]
PLUMBING ENGINEER
GUTTMAN & BLAEVOET
2351 POWELL ST.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94133
707-523.3010 X 303
CONTACT: ROLANDO JACO
[email protected]
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT SITE
108 UNITS OF AFFORDABLE FAMILY HOUSING AND ASSOCIATED COMMON SPACES, OPEN SPACE AND WITH ON-GRADE PARKING.
PROJECT SUMMARY
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR, SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
APN: 224-49-006 | 61,409 SF | 1.4098 ACRES
VACANT SINCE LATE 2016 / EARLY 2017
REFER TO C1.01 FOR EXISTING SITE DIMENSIONS
OFFICE BUILDING
BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 28,950 sf
LOT COVERAGE: 15,181 sf / 61,409 sf = 24%
EXISTING: OG GENERAL OFFICE
PROPOSED: PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
EXISTING: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
PROPOSED: HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
SEE SURVEY DRAWING FOR DETAILS
ZONING INFORMATION
ZONING DATA:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
PARCEL INFORMATION:
EXISTING USE:
ZONING CLASSIFICATION:
GENERAL PLAN:
LAND USE:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
JURISDICTION: SANTA CLARA COUNTY
ZONI
NG: SANTA CLARA CITY MUNICIPAL CODE, ZONING CODE, & BUILDING
ORDINANCES
BUILDING: 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE
FIRE: 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE
MECHANICAL: 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE
ELECTRICAL: 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE
PLUMBING: 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE
ENERGY: 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE
CODE AS AMENDED AND ADOPTED BY THE STATE BUILDING CODE COUNCIL
AND THE CITY OF SANTA CLARA
OCCUPANCY GROUPS: PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL (R-2), W/ SOME (A-3), (B), (S-2) SPACES OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS:
(PER CBC 508.4) R-2 | A-3: 1-HR B | A-3: 1-HR R-2 | B: 1-HR A-3 | S-2: 1-HR R-2 | S-2: 1-HR
TYPE OF CONTRUCTION:
TYPE III-A & I-A
FIRE PROTECTION:
SPRINKLERED PER NFPA 13
ALLOWABLE AREA:
BUILDING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION
TYPE III-A PORTION:
PER 506.2.3: SINGLE-OCCUPANCY, MULTISTORY BUILDINGS (WITH ACCESSORY USES) AA=TOTAL ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA: 170,400 SF
ALLOWABLE AREA PER FLOOR: 85,200 SF
AA= [AT + (NS X IF)] X SA
AA= 72,000 + (24,000 X 0.55) X 2 = 170,400
IF= [F/P - 0.25]W/30
IF= [594.6/741.85 - 0.25] X 30/30 = 0.55
AT= 72,000 (WITHOUT HEIGHT INCREASE)
NS= 24,000
F= 594.6'
P= 741.85'
W= 30
SA= 2
TYPE I PORTION:
UNLIMITED FOR S-2, A-3, B, AND R-2 ACCESSORY
ALLOWABLE HEIGHT
5 ST
ORIES PER TABLE 504.4, TYPE IIIA R-2
65' PER TABLE 504.3, TYPE IIIA R-2 WITH AREA INCREASE
(MAXIMUM STORIES AND HEIGHT TO BE MEASURED OVER TYPE I PODIUM) SPECIAL PROVISIONS:
CBC 510.4 PARKING BENEATH GROUP R: NUMBER OF TYPE IIIA STORIES TO START ABOVE THE TYPE I GARAGE.
CBC 510.2 HORIZONTAL BUILDING SEPARATION ALLOWANCE: TYPE I PORTION CONSIDERED A SEPARATE BUILDING FOR THE PURPOSES OF AREA CALCULATIONS.
CBC 1009.2 HORIZONTAL EXITS: IN BUILDING PROVIDED WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM, THE ELEVATOR SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED ON FLOORS PROVIDED WITH HORIZONTAL EXITS.
CBC 31.04 A PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY: BUILDINGS CONNECTED BY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS SHALL BE CONSIDERED TO BE SEPARATE STRUCTURES, AND SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION.
CBC 31.04.5.2 ALTERNATIVE SEPARATION: DISTANCE BETWEEN CONNECTED BUILDINGS ARE OVER 10', AND BOTH THE BUILDINGS AND WALKWAY ARE PROVIDED WITH SPRINKLER.
REQUIRED RATING:
SHAFTS: 2 HOURS
EXIT STAIR ENCLOSURES: 2 HOURS
HORIZONTAL EXIT: 2 HOURS
SQUARE FOOTAGE:
SEE G2.00A.
EGRESS:
SEE CODE SUMMARY SHEET. G2.01 THROUGH G2.05
EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE WINDOWS:
CBC 1030.1 EXCEPTION 1, RESCUE WINDOWS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION EQUIPPED THROUGHOUT WITH AN APPROVED SPRINKLER SYSTEM.
ACCESSIBILITY:
100% OF THE UNITS ARE ADAPTABLE AND COMPLY WITH 2019 CBC SECTION 11A. 15% (17) OF THE UNITS HAVE ADDED MOBILITY FEATURES PER 2010 ADA & FHA GUIDELINES. 5% (6) OF THE UNITS WILL HAVE ADDED COMMUNICATION FEATURES PER 2010 ADA & FHA GUIDELINES.
UNIT WITH MOBILITY FEATURES:
TO BE DETERMINED
UNITS WITH COMMUNICATION FEATURES:
TO BE DETERMINED.
GSF TABLE
SEE G2.00A FOR BREAKDOWN AND FLOOR PLANS
FEMA MAP
PROJECT SITE
(IN ZONE X)
F/R
ROOM NAME / NUMBER
WALL / PARTITION
ASSEMBLY TYPE
FLOOR / ROOF ASSEMBLY
WINDOW TAG
DOOR NUMBER
SPOT ELEVATION
REVISION CLOUD
DETAIL CALLOUT
NORTH ARROW
GRIDLINE
BUILDING SECTION / SECTION
WALL SECTION
ELEVATION
FLOOR ELEVATION
PROPERTY LINE
SMOKE DETECTOR
EXIT SIGN
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET
0 1
A1.01
1 A1.01
FIRST FLOOR
ELEV 100'-0"
1 A1.01
1 A1.01
1 1A
1A
1A
W/P
ROOM NAME
101
101B
X'-X"
FEC
STOREFRONT TAG1A
SYMBOLS
DOOR TYPE101B
MATERIAL TAGXX-XX
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:02:47 PM
G0.02
05/25/2022
1927400
PROJECT INFO
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2DEDICATED
PARKLAND None
DENSITY: 75.2 DU/ acre
Class 2: 8 spaces
Class 1: 108 spaces
BIKE PARKING
*See parking plan
Total Parking Provided: 82 Spaces
PARKING 0.76 spaces/unit (at 108 units)
Parking Setback: 6'
North Edge: 10'
West Edge: varies (67'7" to 72')
Civic Center Dr.
10' sidewalk zone + 5' setback
SETBACKS &
FRONTAGES
Lincoln St:
10' sidewalk zone + varied setback (15' to 50')
LOT COVERAGE 31,635sf / 61,409 sf =52%
HEIGHT: 5-stories
58'-9 1/2" along Civic Center Drive.
60'-6" along Lincoln Street
66'-7" along North facade
64'-5" along West façade
CATEGORY PROPOSED COMMENTS / STATUS
v v
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
GSF - TOTAL
Name Construction Type Area
AREA 'A' TYPE I-A 18408 SF
AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 13227 SF
AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 47494 SF
AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 53608 SF
132737 SF
MITH UN
EB (:} C)
----0
(:}
◊
------B = =
~
0 6~
,-7
$ e>--_J
®
~
= □
0 t!1 1 .1!,Alfl~~ ,lttlhlf,fu
C
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:40 PM
G0.03
05/25/2022
1927400
GREEN POINT RATED
CHECKLIST
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
~ .... , __
r--;- .. , ,......._.--.
!>- -•------:!--'-_,._.., .... _._
MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/S l.-..'G
1,I l I I j j I I
C
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:41 PM
G0.04
05/25/2022
1927400
GREEN BUILDING
ARCHITECTURE
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
2G1a CAL!f!OIU&A GRll.N 8\J IU'.lllilG STAN DARO COOi!! (CGC) RESlb£.Nf\AL CHll!:CllU&T
lll&.c.«IIJIEIIMINO
""""" ____ ..... _...,. ____ ,,. __ _
•---.--.-.-OlC •IOII
=:=o;;:;::..--:-...::=-=~r·------ • _.._ _..,...,.,.. ___ _,, .. __ _., ::::-:=..-=:·:.-=--==-=-~~~::::=.= • _....slf_......., ........ .,...__ ... c... ...... 0-0--1.a ------------..---.---...._.--.. ii---~------"'~1,._.ua;11• ~.~ .. _ ... _______ ,.._ ,.,_..,__ ■ _T ___ -- ---Ill ____ _
--- .... -•j~ .. -IOIC•Jllal-" _ ,,. __ ,. _____ ...,. ___ .. :..::.=::,.-::~:a-:--... ---------·-""'~ • -----ri,,,---••--1.J. ____ ._ __ _ _IIA..,.,--•ft--OX•:M•••• =::;:':':;:------ .. ---··-•·..---•"I . ._,.,_ ,.,. ___ ,.. ___ u.,_...., .. ,µx;UOl1~ - - .. ---·-··----· .. ,,..,_ . _, ... 1
--..-.---....-....---.--.. ---•,-rnl,,., .. ~.-.~-c.:•~ --------- ...----- .. ("~'111--...._ __ ..,,.._..,.._. _ ......... i:......-•-~t- • O.--lfl.Cl.-•- ....... -c.11::,Jl)o,
H •
-- --.. -·-·-------·--.,_ •«i..•aaJ..••-•-r.-•- .
__._ ________ l,Ctic;•G11
---=---..::.==--=--=-'--===~-.::...-.: ~----------..-.. ------·---"""~"'-.. _., ____ _ ------a.c•t,:io• _____ ""_.,., _______ . ___ , ----..-...---1/U:--alC•-J-J l~----.,.~-.--~----1!1"" ■
=-~~.:~--------. ---.-- . I~~•--•-..--. __ ..,.....,. ___ ,. ::::;-..:=---=~.t=~~---,, .. --...... - •
=---:~:=~ ....... -=--=-.,.=---=--== •
c-__ ,,_, ______ __ , . -.--
=:.-:!::-.:::.:-.:~::."::=:~·------ • ------ ___________ ..... -"·--~-----... .,_ _____ _ ____ ....,. _________ IEVC•~
-•-.tv<;--•-.. --~ .... --il--
._,. ___ ,., . ,___..,_,.. ___ a:1'!1'<11111
......---. .... -~~ .. c.,- .. .-.... _ .. _ __ .,__ ... _..,_...,cx.:,w.z lln-----DMIDMr•~~ C-,~o,DMIN.ilonl-
1.__..,._.....,. _____ .._ ·------- .. --h,----» .. ~o-.__ --•-----•-•-• c.,.,. _ .. _~- ....... -.... -__ ..
- -
MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
KEY
EXISTING
BUILDING
PARKING
CIVIC CENTER DR.
LINCOLN ST.
1 3 42
5 6
7 8
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
SITE
SITE
EL CAMINO REAL
LINCOLN ST.
CIVIC CENTER DR.
EL CAMINO REAL
CIVIC CENTER DR.
LINCOLN ST.
9 9
WOOD RAILING AND
WINDOW TRIM
STUCCO EXTERIOR
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:43 PM
G1.01
05/25/2022
1927400
SITE & SURROUNDING
AREA PHOTOS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANN ING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
THE DESIGN FOR CIVIC CENTER FAMILY HOUSING CREATES A GATEWAY CONDITION MOVING FROM EL CAMINO REAL TO THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS. THE SOUTHERN LEG OF THE BUILDING EXTENDS TOWARDS THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS, MAKING IT CLEARLY VISIBLE AS YOU MAKE YOUR WAY FROM EL CAMINO REAL DOWN LINCOLN. IT SERVES
AS A WELCOMING POINT OF ORIENTATION, WITH A COMMUNITY ROOM OCCUPYING THE CORNER OF THE GROUND FLOOR. MOVING DOWN LINCOLN, THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING PULLS BACK FROM THE STREET, CREATING A LANDSCAPED FORECOURT THAT MIMICS THE CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS OPEN SPACE ACROSS THE STREET.
THE BUILDING IS BROKEN INTO 2 DISTINCT VOLUMES, REDUCING THE APPARENT SCALE OF THE BUILDING. THE
VOLUMES ARE CONNECTED BY A BRIDGE THAT PROVIDES A VISUAL CONNECTION BETWEEN THE PRIVATE COURTYARD AND THE PUBLIC REALM.
NARRATIVE
RENEWAL AND RESILIENCE
LAYERS OF BARK OF THE BIG BERRY/ BLUE MANZANITA PEEL ANNUALLY AS AN ADAPTATION FOR PROTECTION AGAINST INSECTS AND PARASITIC ORGANISMS. TANNINS AND OTHER COMPOUNDS PRODUCED IN THE CELLS OF
THE OUTER BARK SERVE TO DETER THESE ORGANISMS AND ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VARIED COLORS AND LAYERED QUALITY OF THE TRUNK AND BRANCHES. THE PHYSICAL EXPRESSION OF THIS SPECIES IS ONE OF CONSTANT RENEWAL AND RESILIENCE, AND APT METAPHOR FOR A NEW COMMUNITY.
THE FORMAL LANGUAGE AND MATERIAL EXPRESSION OF THIS BUILDING TAKES ITS INSPIRATION FROM THE BLUE MANZANITA, A SPECIES ENDEMIC TO THE SANTA CLARA VALLEY.
THE SIMPLE STUCCO EXTERIOR IS PUNCTUATED BY BALCONIES, WHICH MIMIC THE PEELING BARK AND REVEAL OF A RICH ACCENT COLOR BENEATH, AS THE LIVING SPACES OF THE INTERIOR TRANSITION TO THE OUTSIDE.
THE BASE OF THE BUILDING IS WRAPPED IN A WARM GRAY STUCCO WITH NATURAL WOOD ACCENT PANELS EMPHASIZING THE PUBLIC PROGRAM ELEMENTS AND MAIN ENTRY, DRAWING PEOPLE AND THE OUTSIDE IN.
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:45 PM
G1.02
05/25/2022
1927400
RENDERINGS, COLORS &
MATERIALS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
LINCOLN ST. (EAST) PERSPECTIVE
COLORS AND MATERIALS
STUCCO 1A- WHITE
STUCCO 1B- BLUE
STUCCO 1C- LIGHT GRAY
FIBER CEMENT PLANK - DARK GREY THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING; ALT. FIBER CEMENT PLANK FASCIA / WINDOW FRAME / BRAKE METAL 4, 5, 6 - DARK BRONZE 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
PERFORATED METAL GUARDRAIL/WALL PANEL - COPPER COLOR
STUCCO 1D- DARK GRAY
STREET TREES ARE REMOVED FROM RENDERING FOR CLARITY
MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
THE DESIGN INCLUDES GROUND LEVEL UNITS ALONG CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WITH A LANDSCAPED SETBACK AND
PRIVATE PATIOS TO HELP CREATE AN ACTIVE, RESIDENTIAL FEEL ON THIS STREET THAT TRANSITIONS INTO A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD.
THE BUILDING IS SET BACK FROM THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY BY 65’, AND TREES ARE USED TO PROVIDE A NATURAL SCREENING BETWEEN THE NEW BUILDING AND EXISTING HOMES.
WINDOWS ON THE WEST FACING ELEVATION ARE LIMITED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF THE EXISTING HOMES.
NARRATIVE
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:04:06 PM
G1.03
05/25/2022
1927400
RENDERINGS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUS
ING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
CIVIC CENTER PERSPECTIVE
LOBBY ENTRY PERSPECTIVE CIVIC CENTER STREET LEVEL PERSPECTIVE 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
STREET TREES ARE REMOVED FROM RENDERING FOR CLARITY
STREET TREES ARE REMOVED FROM RENDERING FOR CLARITY
~---------------------------------, MITH UN
C
UP
UPEV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
DN
PROJECT NORTH
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED SETBACK
HOSE LENGTH
FIRE ENGINE
EVA LANE
PARALLEL PARKING ZONE
(N) FIRE HYDRANT
(E) FIRE HYDRANT TO BE REMOVED
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL
SEE A2.01 FOR LOCATION
FDC
FACP
NOTES
1. SEE A3.11 & A3.12 FOR FULL BUILDING SECTIONS
2. SEE A2.01 FOR GROUND LEVEL CONDITIONS
INCLUDING FACP LOCATION
3. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADWAYS
SHALL BE RECORDED AS PERMANENT EVAE
4. PER FD COMMENTS, AMMR WILL BE SUBMITTED
FOR EVAE AT WESTERN DRIVEWAY.
5. EVAE TO HAVE ALL WEATHER SURFACE
DESIGNED TO SUPPORT GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT
OF 75,000 LBS.
CONSTRUCTION TYPE
TYPE IIIA & I-A
292'-11"
220'-4" 208'-11"
188'-0"
158'-6"
LEVEL-2 PODIUM COURTYARD
SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
AERIAL ACCESS ROAD
FIRE ACCESS ROAD
217'-2"
HOSE REACH
64'-0"
HOSE REACH
30'-7"
HOSE REACH
125'-4"
CIVIC CENTER DR.
LINCOLN ST.
PRIMARY ENTRY
SEE A2.01
STANDPIPE W/ OUTLET
AND HOSE VALVE
BIOCELL TYP. SEE
CIVIL DRAWINGS
(E) HYDRANT (+/-120')
(E) HYDRANT (+/- 100')
10'-0" 5'-0"
SETBACK (N) STREET
EASEMENT
(E) R.O.W.
36' - 0"46' - 0"
FIRE TRUCK TURN AT CORNER OF
LINCOLN ST. & CIVIC CENTER DR.
SETBACK
10'-0"
HOSE REACH
28'-3"
HOSE REACH
42'-0"
HOSE REACH
117'-0"
HOSE REACH
54'-6"
NEW HYDRANT
NEW HYDRANT
FDC@ LEVEL 1
NEW HYDRANT
G1.04
3 26'-0"
G1.04
2 41'-0"
59'-2"
76'-0"
23'-2"
21'-9"
57'-10"
AERIAL ACCESS ROAD
HOSE REACH
65'-6"
HOSE REACH
28'-3"
(E) RO.W. SETBACK
HOSE REACH21'-6"
HOSE REACH63'-2"
HOSE REACH
44'-6"
HOSE REACH
61'-3"
HOSE REACH91'-7"
STAIR 2
STAIR 1
19'-0"
17'-10"
DRIVEWAY
TO GARAGE
PARKING
HOSE REACH
25'-6"
HOSE REACH
40'-0"
HOSE REACH
20'-0"
HOSE REACH
15'-2"
5'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"
G1.04
4 100' MAX FROM PUBLIC HYDRANT
73'-2 1/2"
5' WIDE ALL-WEATHER PATHWAY
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
9'-0" 10'-4"
105' LADDER LENGTH
STREET
PARKING
FIRE
TRUCK
LADDER REACH
64'-2"
27'-10 1/2" 50.2°70.0° MAX
5'-0" 10'-0"
SIDEWALK
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
54'-6"
SETBACK
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
9'-0" 10'-4"
105' LADDER LENGTH
LADDER REACH
60'-4"
STREET
PARKING
FIRE
TRUCK
5'-0" 10'-0"
SIDEWALK
54.3°70.0° MAX
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
54'-6"
SETBACK
29'-7 1/4"
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE - WEST
EDGE OF AERIAL ACCESS ROAD
17'-0" 26'-0"
105' LADDER LENGTH
LADDER REACH
53'-6"
SURFACE
PARKING
FIRE
TRUCK
24'-0"
EDGE OF AERIAL ACCESS ROAD
SURFACE
PARKING
64.5°
17'-10 1/4"
14'-6" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0"
54'-6"
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:57:56 PM
G1.04
05/25/2022
1927400
FIRE ACCESS DIAGRAM
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1" = 100'-0"10 FIRE HYDRANT DIAGRAM
1/16" = 1'-0"1 FIRE ACCESS-LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN
Fire Flow Requirements with Mixed Construction
Building
Total Area (SF)
Level 1 (Type IA) 31,635 SF
Level 2-5 (Type IIIA) 101,066 SF
Number of Stories 5
Height Varies from 58'-9" to 66'-6"
Construction Type 4 levels Type IIIA over 1 level Type IA Occupancy Group R-2, S-2, A, B
Calculations:
Total Building area: 31,635 square feet (Type IA - Garage ) + 101,066 square feet (Type IIIA - Residential) = 132,701 SF Percentage of Building: IA = 31,635/132,701 x 100 = 23.8; IIIA = 101,066/132,701 x 100 = 76.2
Fire Flow Duration, Hydrant Locations and Distribution are to be based on the full Fire Flow required per CFC Table B105.1(2) Full Fire Flow: 0.238 (2,000 gpm) + 0.762 (4,500 gpm) = 3,905 gpm = 4,000 gpm (round up) A 75% reduction in fire-flow is allowed with the installation of an automatic fire sprinkler system designed in accordance with California Fire Code § B105.2.
A max 50% reduction in fire flow is allowed per Conditions of Approval from Santa Clara Fire Department for this project.
Reduced Fire Flow = 0.50 x 4,000 gpm = 2,000 gpm
Based upon 4,000 gpm Full Fire Flow, there needs to be a minimum of 4 hydrants with an average spacing of 350 feet (from Appendix C of the Fire Code) for the duration of 4 hours. The frontage distance based on the 4,000 gpm Full flow requirement is 210 feet. 1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
1/16" = 1'-0"2 LADDER REACH AT CIVIC BALCONY 02
1/16" = 1'-0"3 LADDER REACH AT CIVIC MAIN FACADE
1/16" = 1'-0"4 LADDER REACH AT WESTERN DRIVEWAY
L=t
L-f
1 I i - rr----~-------~-------:c=::~--- == -- --------------- - \ l"'""T""""""'::,.=;: \
-~
'
\
I
ii= 11~1
1' 1•1-...' ----C_J.-,} -----------2 \_,,\/ \\ \ ' I
I : // ~ '
I i / ,
: / r--- ~ s::::::::r--L---= I \ .I-
' \ I
••
Q
E9
MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/S l.-..'G
UP
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
UP
DN
LINCOLN ST.
BLDG
ENTRYNEW DRIVEWAY
CIVIC CENTER DR.
9 UNIVERSAL STALLS
15 UNIVERSAL STALLS
14 UNIVERSAL STALLS
2 ADA VAN STALLS
NEW DRIVEWAY
3 EV READY STALLS
4 UNIVERSAL STALLS
71' - 9 3/4"
3 UNIVERSAL STALLS
8 UNIVERSAL STALLS
8 UNIVERSAL STALLS
6 UNIVERAL STALLS
1 ADA STALL
7 UNIVERSAL STALLS
1 EV READY STALL
PARKING LEGEND
UNIVERSAL
8'-6"
17'-0"
ACCESSIBLE
9'-0"
VAN ACCESSIBLE
9'-0"
18'-0"
VAN
18'-0"
ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV)
EV
9'-0"
18'-0"
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:58:03 PM
G1.05
05/25/2022
1927400
PARKING PLAN
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/16" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - PARKING
** Included as part of Van accessible stall
* Included as part of ADA stall
AT 0.76 SPACES/ UNIT
TOTAL PARKING 82
SUBTOTAL PARKING 50
EV PARKING* 5 9'-0" X 18'-0"
CALGreen 4.106.4.2 (10% of total parking)
CBC 11B-228.3.2.1 Includes (1) Van & (1) ADA Stall
ADA STALLS REQ'D 1 9'-0" (+5'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" CBC 11B-208.2.3.1 VAN ACCESSBILE REQ. 1 9'-0" (+8'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" CBC 11B-208.2.4 (1/6 of ADA stalls) UNIVERSAL STALLS PROVIDED 45 8'-6" X 17'-0"
CATEGORY PROPOSED SIZE COMMENTS
PARKING COUNT - INTERIOR
SUBTOTAL PARKING 32
EV PARKING* 3 9'-0" X 18'-0"
CALGreen 4.106.4.2 (10% of total parking)
CBC 11B-228.3.2.1 Includes (1) Van Stall
ADA STALLS 0** 9'-0" (+5'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" 11B-208.2.3.1; VAN ACCESSBILE 2 9'-0" (+8'-0" ACCESS AISLE) X 18'-0" 11B-208.2.4 (1/6 of ADA stalls) UNIVERSAL STALLS PROVIDED 29 8'-6" X 17'-0"
CATEGORY PROPOSED SIZE COMMENTS
PARKING COUNT - EXTERIOR
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
l
,----------------------- ™™\
1-1 1-]-I I -I -17~~ \ r
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I , ~~~ ~ ~ \
L__________________________ _ _____ ,,,,I
I
\ 'c_
I
I
-MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/S l.-..'G
f.: ----\_\
l j \
----- ------\
C
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
FDC
FDC
2BR-ASBR-D2BR-A 3BR-D
ELEC
RM
FIRE
PUMP
DWH
EERC
TRASH
M SHOP
BIKE
RM
LAUNDRY
COMMUNITY
RM
LOBBY
OFFICE
TENANT
SERVICES
PANTRY MTG
RM
MPOE
/TEL
HEAT
RMSTORAGE
RR
JAN. ELEV.
CTRL.
?
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
? 3BR-B 2BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
3BR-A2BR-B
2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
SBR-A
1BR-A 3BR-B
SBR-A
1BR-C
1BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B 3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
1BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
3BR-A2BR-C2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
1BR-A 3BR-B
1BR-C
2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B 3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
1BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
3BR-A2BR-B
2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
1BR-C2BR-B
3BR-B1BR-A
SBR-A
2BR-B
SBR-A
3BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B 3BR-B_2
3BR-B_3
SBR-A
3BR-B 2BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-B
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
3BR-A2BR-B2BR-B
SBR-A
2BR-B
3BR-C
1BR-C
SBR-A
3BR-B1BR-A
SBR-A
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:58:20 PM
G1.07
05/25/2022
1927400
UNIT COUNTS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1" = 40'-0"1 GROUND FLOOR - FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (4 UNITS) 1" = 40'-0"2 LEVEL-2 PODIUM - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS)
1" = 40'-0"3 LEVEL-3 FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS) UNIT COUNT - 1BR
Level Name Count
1BR-A
LEVEL 02 1BR-A 4
LEVEL 03 1BR-A 4
LEVEL 04 1BR-A 4
LEVEL 05 1BR-A 4
1BR-B
LEVEL 02 1BR-B 2
LEVEL 03 1BR-B 2
LEVEL 04 1BR-B 2
LEVEL 05 1BR-B 2
1BR-C
LEVEL 02 1BR-C 1
LEVEL 03 1BR-C 1
LEVEL 04 1BR-C 1
LEVEL 05 1BR-C 1
28 UNIT COUNT - 2BR
Level Name Count
2BR-A
LEVEL 01 2BR-A 2
2BR-B
LEVEL 02 2BR-B 6
LEVEL 03 2BR-B 5
LEVEL 04 2BR-B 6
LEVEL 05 2BR-B 6
2BR-C
LEVEL 03 2BR-C 1
26 UNIT COUNT - 3BR
Level Name Count
3BR-A
LEVEL 02 3BR-A 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-A 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-A 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-A 1
3BR-B
LEVEL 02 3BR-B 3
LEVEL 03 3BR-B 3
LEVEL 04 3BR-B 3
LEVEL 05 3BR-B 3
3BR-B_2
LEVEL 02 3BR-B_2 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-B_2 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-B_2 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-B_2 1
3BR-B_3
LEVEL 02 3BR-B_3 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-B_3 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-B_3 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-B_3 1
3BR-C
LEVEL 02 3BR-C 1
LEVEL 03 3BR-C 1
LEVEL 04 3BR-C 1
LEVEL 05 3BR-C 1
3BR-D
LEVEL 01 3BR-D 1
29 UNIT COUNT - STUDIO
Level Name Count
SBR-A
LEVEL 02 SBR-A 6
LEVEL 03 SBR-A 6
LEVEL 04 SBR-A 6
LEVEL 05 SBR-A 6
SBR-D
LEVEL 01 SBR-D 1
25 1" = 40'-0"5 LEVEL-5 FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS) 1" = 40'-0"4 LEVEL-4 FLOOR PLAN - UNIT COUNT (26 UNITS)
UNIT COUNT - TOTAL
UNIT TYPE COUNT
AVERAGE
SQ FT
SBR-A 24 379 SF
SBR-D 1 395 SF
1BR-A 16 595 SF
1BR-B 8 641 SF
1BR-C 4 605 SF
2BR-A 2 766 SF
2BR-B 23 789 SF
2BR-C 1 826 SF
3BR-A 4 1139 SF
3BR-B 12 1091 SF
3BR-B_2 4 1107 SF
3BR-B_3 4 1090 SF
3BR-C 4 1131 SF
3BR-D 1 997 SF
Grand total: 108
NOTES:
1. ALL AREAS IN THE SCHEDULE ARE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
LEVEL AND APPROXIMATE IN NATURE.
2. NSF FOR RESIDENTIAL UNIT INCLUDES SHAFT SPACE
WITHIN THE UNIT.
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
~---------------- - - - - MITHUN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
18408 SF
AREA 'A'
TYPE I-A
11860 SF
AREA 'B'
TYPE I-A
669 SF
AREA 'B'
TYPE I-A
370 SF
AREA 'B'
TYPE I-A
328 SF
AREA 'B'
TYPE I-A
11867 SF
AREA 'C'
TYPE III-A
13302 SF
AREA 'D'
TYPE III-A
11882 SF
AREA 'C'
TYPE III-A
13466 SF
AREA 'D'
TYPE III-A
11864 SF
AREA 'C'
TYPE III-A
13466 SF
AREA 'D'
TYPE III-A
11882 SF
AREA 'C'
TYPE III-A
13374 SF
AREA 'D'
TYPE III-A
1. GSF IS MEASURED TO OUTSIDE FACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS, CENTERLINE OF CORRIDOR WALLS, AND CENTERLINE OF PARTITION WALLS.
2. ALL AREAS IN THE SCHEDULE ARE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT LEVEL AND APPROXIMATE IN NATURE.
3. GSF DOES NOT INCLUDE COVERED EXTERIOR AREAS.
NOTES:
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:58:30 PM
G2.00A
05/25/2022
1927400
GROSS AREA CALCS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1" = 40'-0"1 LEVEL 01 - GSF AREAS
1" = 40'-0"2 LEVEL 02 - GSF AREAS
1" = 40'-0"3 LEVEL 03 - GSF AREAS
1" = 40'-0"4 LEVEL 04 - GSF AREAS
1" = 40'-0"5 LEVEL 05 - GSF AREAS
GSF - TYPE I-A
Name Construction Type Area
LEVEL 01
AREA 'A' TYPE I-A 18408 SF
AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 11860 SF
AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 669 SF
AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 370 SF
AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 328 SF
31635 SFGSF - TYPE III-A
Name Construction Type Area
LEVEL 02
AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11867 SF
AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13302 SF
LEVEL 03
AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11882 SF
AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13466 SF
LEVEL 04
AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11864 SF
AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13466 SF
LEVEL 05
AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 11882 SF
AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 13374 SF
101102 SF
GSF - TOTAL
Name Construction Type Area
AREA 'A' TYPE I-A 18408 SF
AREA 'B' TYPE I-A 13227 SF
AREA 'C' TYPE III-A 47494 SF
AREA 'D' TYPE III-A 53608 SF
132737 SF
GSF - PER PROGRAM
LEVEL PROGRAM GSF
LEVEL 01
LEVEL 01 BOH 2371 SF
LEVEL 01 CIRCULATION -
HORIZONTAL
1174 SF
LEVEL 01 CIRCULATION -
VERTICAL
725 SF
LEVEL 01 COMMONS 5802 SF
LEVEL 01 PARKING 18338 SF
LEVEL 01 RESIDENTIAL 3229 SF
LEVEL 02
LEVEL 02 BOH 573 SF
LEVEL 02 CIRCULATION -
HORIZONTAL
2907 SF
LEVEL 02 CIRCULATION -
VERTICAL
606 SF
LEVEL 02 RESIDENTIAL 21083 SF
LEVEL 03
LEVEL 03 BOH 572 SF
LEVEL 03 CIRCULATION -
HORIZONTAL
3079 SF
LEVEL 03 CIRCULATION -
VERTICAL
606 SF
LEVEL 03 RESIDENTIAL 21073 SF
LEVEL 04
LEVEL 04 BOH 574 SF
LEVEL 04 CIRCULATION -
HORIZONTAL
3079 SF
LEVEL 04 CIRCULATION -
VERTICAL
606 SF
LEVEL 04 RESIDENTIAL 21071 SF
LEVEL 05
LEVEL 05 BOH 574 SF
LEVEL 05 CIRCULATION -
HORIZONTAL
3075 SF
LEVEL 05 CIRCULATION -
VERTICAL
603 SF
LEVEL 05 RESIDENTIAL 21004 SF
GSF -SUMMARY
PROGRAM GSF
BOH 4664 SF
CIRCULATION -
HORIZONTAL
13314 SF
CIRCULATION - VERTICAL 3146 SF
COMMONS 5802 SF
PARKING 18338 SF
RESIDENTIAL 87460 SF
132723 SF
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
-MITH UN
I I I I l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
I I I
~H
C
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX 8" SS
EX 8" SS
EX 8" SS
EX 12" SD
EX 12" SD
EX 12" SD
EX 8" W
EX 10" W
N89°45'55"E 281.59'
S00°14'05"E 220.00'
N89°45'55"E 237.69'
R=843.74'L=54.60'
Δ=3°42'29"
N22°37'09"W 137.83'
R=30.00' L=58.84'
Δ=112°23'04"
EX AC PARKING LOT
TO BE REMOVED
EX WOOD FENCE ON TOP
OF 2' TO 3' RETAINING WALL
TO REMAIN
EX 2 STORY BUILDING
TO BE REMOVED
EX AC PARKING LOT
TO BE REMOVED
EX TRANSFORMER
TO REMAIN
EX FIRE HYDRANT
TO BE RELOCATED
EX STREET LIGHT
TO BE RELOCATED
EX STREET LIGHT
TO BE RELOCATED
EX STREET LIGHT
TO BE RELOCATED
EX STREET LIGHT
TO BE RELOCATED
EX DRIVEWAY CUT
TO BE REMOVED
35.2'±
8.3'±
24.9'± 5.9'±
35'
EX CURB RAMP
TO BE REMOVED
AND REPLACED
45'
EX STORM DRAIN CURB
INLET TO BE REMOVED
AND REPLACED
EX 12" SD PIPE
TO BE REMOVED
AND REPLACED
EXISTING
CONDITIONS
C1.01
1 INCH = 20 FEET
40 20 10 0
LEGEND
WATER MAIN
WATER METER
WATER VALVE
ELECTROLIER
PROJECT BOUNDARY
CURB AND GUTTER
SANITARY SEWER
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
CENTERLINE
PROPERTY LINE
SIDEWALK
STORM DRAIN LINE
DRIVEWAY
FIRE HYDRANT
TREE
EXISTING
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
PULL BOX
WHEELCHAIR RAMP
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
STORM DRAIN CURB INLET
JOINT TRENCH
GAS
STORM DRAIN INLET
NOTES
1. ALL EXISTING TREES WITHIN THE PROPERTY TO BE REMOVED.
2. EXISTING CURB, GUTTER AND ATTACHED SIDEWALK TO BE
REMOVED AND REPLACED ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE ON
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE.
3. EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE PROJECT FRONTAGE
ON LINCOLN STREET TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.
4. EXISTING ATTACHED SIDEWALK ALONG THE PROJECT
FRONTAGE ON LINCOLN STREET TO BE REMOVED AND
REPLACED WITH A DETACHED SIDEWALK.
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
(
W(E)-W(E)---"t't->--._ ti,.~
~£)-w(E~'/,\0---
SO(E)-SO(E)-SO(E)-SD(E)----SD(E)-SD(E)-SD{E)-SO(E)
-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-----SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)----0--SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS{E)----SS(EJ-SS(E)-SS{E~S u---
-SS(E)
Q
-SO(E)
@
D
-W(E)-
I)-<,
' -JT(E)-
-G([)-
MITH UN
-1-IMI-I-
C
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
35'
25' 10'
26'
10'
10'
4.5'
10'
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING SPACES
WATER EASEMENT
5.5' SIDEWALK ESMT
5' SETBACK ESMT
5' SETBACK ESMT
25' 10'
12.71'
18'
9' 8' 9'
(2)
8.5'x17'
PARKING
SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING
SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING SPACES
26'
WATER EASEMENT
11.64'
14.31'
15' SETBACK ESMT
(2)
8.5'x18'
PARKING
SPACES
(1) 9'x18'EV ~ ADA
PARKING SPACE
(1) 9'x18'
EV ~ ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE
PARKING SPACE
(1) 9'x18'
EV PARKING SPACE
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING
SPACES
(3) 8.5'x17'
PARKING
SPACES
(1) 9'x17'
PARKING SPACE
19.22'
3.5' UGEE ESMT
4' UGEE ESMT
10'
10'
10'
10'
FACE OF CURB
BACK OF SIDEWALK
/ /
/ /
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
|| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | XX
10'
10'
10'
10'
SITE PLAN
C1.02
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
CURB AND GUTTER
EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAY
CENTERLINE
PROPOSEDEXISTING
WHEELCHAIR RAMP
1 INCH = 20 FEET
40 20 10 0
SCALE: 1" = 20'
DRIVEWAY'S TRIANGLE OF SAFETY
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
SCALE: 1" = 20'
DRIVEWAY'S TRIANGLE OF SAFETY
LINCOLN STREET
MITH UN
-1-IMI-I-
w--
' \
\
C
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
TC 72.49
EX TC 75.08±
TC 71.05
EX TC 70.40±
FF 72.80
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
EX 12" SD
EX 12" SD
EX 12" SD
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
BOW / FL 75.04BOW 74.80
4.0% 0.9%
FS 72.60
0.5%
A
C2.02
B
C2.02
CC2.02
FF 74.96
D
C2.02
TC 70.47
EX TW 76.0±
EX BW 73.7±
EX TW 76.0±
EX BW 73.5±
EX TW 78.0±
EX BW 75.9±
EX TW 77.9±
EX BW 75.4±
EX TW 77.9±
EX BW 75.2±
EX TW 77.9±
EX BW 75.3±
EX TW 77.9±
EX BW 74.7±
EX TW 75.9±
EX BW 73.9±
EX TW 77.9±
EX BW 73.9±
EG 72.8±
5.5' SIDEWALK ESMT
FF 73.50
FF 71.15
GS 73.50
FF 74.50
FS 74.76
FF 73.50
FS 73.77
GB
FS 73.64
GB0.5%
2.0%
FS 73.12
GBTVC 74.40
FS 73.90
TVC 74.40
FS 73.90
(E) 0.3%
(E)0.9%
FF 73.50
BOW 70.68
TVC 73.47
TVC 73.62
TVC 73.77
2.0%
2.0%
TVC 73.92
TVC 74.20
2.0%
2.0%
2.0%
TVC 74.60
TVC 74.47
TVC 74.74
FS 74.24
TVC 74.74
FS 74.24
TVC 74.74
FS 74.24FF
74.87 FF
74.87 FF
72.70 2.0%
FF
74.40 TVC 74.36
FS 73.86
2.6%
1.8%
1.5%
2.5%
2.3%
FS 73.56~GB
FS 73.62~GB
FS 73.56~GB
2.0%
TVC 74.15
FS 73.65
TVC 73.79
FS 73.29
1.5%
TVC 74.13
FS 73.63
TC 70.74
FF 71.80
BOW 71.00
2% MAX
2% MAX
FS 72.83
FS 72.66
FS 71.66
BOW 70.86
3.9%
2.3%
4.4%
GS 71.15
GS 71.80
FF 73.50
BOW 70.73
FS 70.98
TC 70.57
FS 71.68
FS 71.68
TC 70.60
3.9%
FS 72.56
(2) 6.5" STEPS
1.8%
BOW 70.83
2%
0.9%
FS 70.96
FS 71.01
FS 71.47
FS 71.52
FS 71.59
FS 71.64
EG 71.9±
EG 71.5±
1.0% 1.8%
1.5%
1.2%
1.8%
1.8% 1.8%
GRADING PLAN
C2.01
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
CURB AND GUTTER
EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAY
CENTERLINE
PROPOSEDEXISTING
WHEELCHAIR RAMP
1 INCH = 20 FEET
40 20 10 0
STORM DRAIN LINE
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE
STORM DRAIN CURB INLET
SD
STORM DRAIN INLET (1X1)
STORM DRAIN INLET (2X2)
OVERLAND RELEASE PATH
STORM DRAIN BUBBLER
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
• .
-SO{EJ
@
.
MITH UN
-1-IMI-I-
C
SECTION
NTS A
EX 2'-3' TALL
RETAINING WALL
TO REMAIN
EX PL
7'
DRIVE AISLE PARKING
SECTION
NTS B
GS 71.80
EX PL
GARAGE
2'
BIORETENTION
SECTION
NTS C
BIORETENTION
LINCOLN STREET
EX PLEX CL
45'
35' 4.5'
SECTION
NTS D
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
EX PLEX CL
35'
25'
SIDEWALK
10' 5.71'
FF 74.50
APARTMENT
EX TW 77.9±
EX BW 74.8±
TVC 73.88
EG 72.3±
TVC 74.40
TC 70.67
BOW 70.93
10'
DETACHED
WALK
1'
TC 73.65
BOW 73.83
12.71'±
7'5.5'
BIORETENTION
2%
PARKING
17' 17'26'
GARAGE
3.15'
70.15'
14.33'± 1.5'
VARIES1.5%-2.6%
2%
5.5'
2' MAX
RETAINING
WALL
6' 5' 1.33'±
4.5'
GRADING
SECTIONS
C2.02
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
- MITH UN
-1-IMI-I-
C
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
EVEV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
25 19
19 20
20 CONCRETE
APRON
25 19
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
W W W W
W
W
IRR
SSSSSS
W
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
EX 12" SD
EX 12" SD
EX 12" SD
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
EX PROPERTY LINE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
EX 8" SSEX 8" SS
EX 8" SS
EX 8" W
EX 10" W
DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER
FIRE WATER SERVICE
WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER
IRRIGATION SERVICE
WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER
50 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.0200
WATER EASEMENT
EX PROPERTY LINE
WATER EASEMENT
51 LF ~ 6" SS
@ S = 0.0100
139 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085
CONNECT TO EX SEWER
INV 66.80 ~ 6" IN (N)
EX INV 66.1± ~ EX 8" THRU (W-E)
EX SDMH
EX RIM 70.8±
INV 65.45 ~ 12" IN (W)
EX INV 65.3± ~ EX 12" THRU (SE-NW)
EX SDMH
EX RIM 74.6±
EX INV 69.0± ~ EX 12" THRU (W-E)
EX SDMH
EX RIM 72.5±
EX INV 67.1± ~ EX 12" IN (W)
EX INV 66.9± ~ EX 12" IN (E)
INV 66.70 ~ 12" IN (NW)
EX INV 66.7± ~ EX 12" IN (SW)
EX INV 66.5± ~ EX 12" OUT (N)
EX SSMH
EX RIM 72.5±
EX INV 64.9± ~ EX 8" IN (SE&W)
EX INV 64.7± ~ EX 8" OUT (NW)
EX SSMH
EX RIM 70.9±
EX INV 63.7± ~ EX 8" THRU (SE-NW)
EX SSMH
EX RIM 74.4±
EX INV 66.9± ~ EX 8" THRU (W-E)
SDCI
TC 71.2±
INV 67.43 ~ 12" IN (W)
INV 67.43 ~ 12" OUT (SE)
SSCO
RIM 71.1±
INV 66.17 ~ 6" OUT (NE)SDMH
RIM 71.3±
INV 66.00 ~ 12" IN (SW)
EX INV 65.7± ~ EX 12" THRU (SE-NW)
SDFI
TG 70.8±
INV 67.00 ~ 6" IN (NW&SE)
INV 67.00 ~ 12" OUT (NE)
SDFI
TG 71.0±
INV 66.91 IN ~ 6" IN (S)
INV 66.91 ~ 12" THRU (W-E)
SDFI
TG 72.4±
INV 67.57 ~ 12" OUT
89 LF ~ 6" SS @ S = 0.020
SDFI
TG 74.4±
INV 69.81 ~ 6" THRU (N-E)
SDFI
TG 72.6±
INV 68.52 ~ 6" OUT
EXISTING WATER VALVE FOR
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO BE REMOVED
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
TO BE REMOVED
SDFI
TG 73.2±
INV 69.33 ~ 6" OUT
SSCO
RIM 73.4±
INV 67.36 ~ 6" OUT
SDFI
TG 74.2±
INV 69.93 ~ 6" OUT
SDFI
TG 74.1±
INV 69.85 ~ 6" OUT
SDFI
TG 70.8±
INV 67.25 ~ 6" OUT
25 LF ~ 6" SD
@ S = 0.0100
14 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0100
SDFI
TG 70.6±
INV 67.14 ~ 6" OUT
SSCO
RIM 71.0±
INV 66.74 ~ 4" OUT
16 LF ~ 4" SS @ S = 0.020
SDFI
TG 70.8±
INV 66.96 ~ 6" OUT
5 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.010
69 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.005
SDFI
TG 71.4±
INV 67.38 ~ 6" OUT
5 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.010
73 LF ~ 12" SD @ S =0.020
SDFI
TG 72.6±
INV 69.10 ~ 6" OUT
63 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.005
SDFI
TG 71.7±
INV 67.23 IN ~ 6" IN (S)
INV 67.23 ~ 12" THRU (W-E)
31 LF TRENCH DRAIN
22 LF ~ 4" SD @ S = 0.020
BUBBLER BOX
TG 70.7±
INV 68.30 ~ 6" OUT
SD INLET
TG 70.9±
INV 68.74 ~ 4" OUT
73 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.0100
62 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085
SDFI
TG 72.8±
INV 68.38 ~ 6" IN (NW)
INV 67.88 ~ 6" IN (SW)
INV 67.88 ~ 12" OUT(E)
45 LF ~ 12" SD @ S = 0.0100
7 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0200
SDCO
RIM 72.8±
INV 68.04 ~ 6" THRU (W-N)
19 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085
SDCO
RIM 73.4±
INV 68.57 ~ 6" THRU
SDCO
RIM 73.4±
INV 68.63 ~ 6" THRU
7 LF ~ 6" SD @ S = 0.0085
12 3.5' UGEE ESMT
4' UGEE ESMT
SECTION2
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
EX PL
FF 74.50
APARTMENT
TC 73.83 BOW 74.01 FS 74.36
SECTION
SCALE: 1" = 5'1
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
EX PL
SIDEWALK WITH TREE WELLS
10'
FF 74.96
APARTMENT
TC 74.36
BOW 74.54
BIORETENTION
AREA
5.17'
1'
ROOT BARRIER FOR
4'x6' TREE WELLS
ROOT BARRIER FOR
4'x6' TREE WELLS
5.17'
FOOTING PER
STRUCTURAL PLANS
4' 1'
10'
SIDEWALK WITH TREE WELLS
13.14'±
0.5' 7.64'
4'
4' 3'
4.5'
2'
3.5' UGEE
0.5'
12.71'±
6.21'
3.5' UGEE
INV 69.31 ~ 6" SD
1'x1' SD INLET BEYOND
SCALE: 1" = 5'
5.5'
4' 3' 2'
5.5' 4.5'
1'x1' SD INLET
INV 69.81 ~ 6" SD
1'
UTILITY PLAN
C3.01
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
CURB AND GUTTER
EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAY
CENTERLINE
PROPOSEDEXISTING
WHEELCHAIR RAMP
1 INCH = 20 FEET
40 20 10 0
STORM DRAIN LINE
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
STORM DRAIN CURB INLET
SD
STORM DRAIN INLET (1X1)
STORM DRAIN INLET (2X2)
STORM DRAIN BUBBLER BOX
WATER MAIN
WATER VALVE
ELECTROLIER
SANITARY SEWER
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
PULL BOX
SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
JOINT TRENCH
SS
W
FIRE WATER
FIRE SERVICE WITH
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTER
GAS
IRRIGATION SERVICE WITH
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
STORM DRAIN CLEAN OUT
STORM DRAIN TRENCH DRAIN
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| +
+
~
+
t>--_llft)~W(Er---'f(El--
-SD(E)-SO(E)-Sll(E)-SO(E)-Sll(E)-SD(E)-SO(E)-SD(E)-----@---SD(E)-SO(E)--SD(E)-SD(E)-SD(E)---SD(EqSO(E)-SO(E)-SO(E)-SO(E)-SD(E) -SS(EJ-~-SS(E)-SS(E)==--SS(E)--=SS(E)~E)--;;;--SS(E)----0-SS(E)-SS(~-SS(E)=-SS(E)--=Ss{E)7E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)-SS(E)~SS I I
H
'9s
\
= &
• .
•
I
u-
w--
MITH UN
= Lill -1-IMI i-
-SD(E)-
@
6 -Ss(E)-
0 -W(E}---
I:
Q--<>
D\
-JT(E)-
-G([)-
C
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
X X X X X X X
XXXXXX
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SDSDSD
SDSDSDSDSDSDSD
SDSDSD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
DMA 1
DMA 2
DMA 3
DMA 4
DMA 5
DMA 6
DMA 7
DMA 8 DMA 9
TCM 1
TCM 2TCM 3TCM 4TCM 5
TCM 6
TCM 7
TCM 8
TCM 11TCM 10
STORMWATER
CONTROL PLAN
C4.01
LEGEND
PROJECT BOUNDARY
CURB AND GUTTER
EASEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAY
CENTERLINE
PROPOSEDEXISTING
WHEELCHAIR RAMP
1 INCH = 20 FEET
40 20 10 0
STORM DRAIN LINE
STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE
STORM DRAIN CURB INLET
SD
STORM DRAIN INLET (1X1)
STORM DRAIN INLET (2X2)
STORM DRAIN BUBBLER
DMA
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA
(DMA)
BIORETENTION BASIN
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
LJ--1
-SD(E)-SD(E)-SD(EJ-SD(E)-SD(E)-SD(E)----@------SD(E)-
:co.-..;,,,, =-=-,.;,,,, :-.
=, .. -_ ..... ,.,...,...
-SO{E)
@
•
MITH UN
-+ IMI -I-
D
TO
STORM
DRAIN
2 TO
STORM
DRAIN
FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER (ABOVE GRADE)
FLOW-THROUGH PLANTER (BELOW GRADE)1
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
* IF TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM
OF FOOTING IS GREATER
THAN OR EQUAL TO 4' WALL
SHALL BE STRUCTURALLY
DESIGNED AND APPROVED
BY PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
DOWNSPOUT NOTE:
IN THE EVENT ONLY ONE
DOWNSPOUT IS LOCATED
WITHIN THE FLOW-THROUGH
PLANTER BOX, CONTRACTOR
SHALL INSTALL A FLOW
SPREADER AT THE
DOWNSPOUT TO ENSURE
PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF
STORMWATER OVER THE
ENTIRE PLANTER.
DOWNSPOUT NOTE:
IN THE EVENT ONLY ONE
DOWNSPOUT IS LOCATED
WITHIN THE FLOW-THROUGH
PLANTER BOX, CONTRACTOR
SHALL INSTALL A FLOW
SPREADER AT THE
DOWNSPOUT TO ENSURE
PROPER DISTRIBUTION OF
STORMWATER OVER THE
ENTIRE PLANTER.
1"
MIN.
RISER
HEIGHT
SEE TCM
TABLE
18"
(BSM)
12"
MIN.
X*0.2'
18"
(BSM)12"
MIN.
RISER
HEIGHT
SEE TCM
TABLE
PAVEMENT
SLOPE TODRAIN
18" MIN.
6" HIGHCURB
6" HIGHCURB
SECTION VIEW
6"
A
A
A-A
SEE
BIORETENTION
OR
FTP DETAILS
CURB OPENING 4N.T.S.
0.2'
VARIES PER
DESIGN
X* * IF TOP OF WALL TO BOTTOM
OF FOOTING IS GREATER
THAN OR EQUAL TO 4' WALL
SHALL BE STRUCTURALLY
DESIGNED AND APPROVED
BY PUBLIC WORKS PRIOR TO
CONSTRUCTION.
SEE
BIORETENTION
OR
FTP DETAILS
5N.T.S. CURB ADJACENT TO BIORETENTION
WARPED
GUTTER
CL
PLAN VIEW
3'-6"
12"
A
A
3:1
MAX
1'-6" MIN6"
VARIES
SEE
PLAN0.2'
MIN.
6"
6"X"
3 MAX DEPRESS 2"
AT OPENING
24"24"
BIO-TREATMENT
SOIL MIX (BSM)
PER SPECS.
ADJACENT
SURFACE
BUILDING WALL
4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE
0.2' BELOW DOWNSPOUTS FOR
DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF
DOWNSPOUT
CLEANOUT
W/ CAP AT
FINISH GRADE
REINF. CONCRETE
PLANTER
4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED
COBBLE 0.2' BELOW
DOWNSPOUTS FOR
DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER
SIDE OF DOWNSPOUT
BUILDING WALLCLEANOUT
W/ CAP AT
FINISH GRADE
PLACE 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE 0.2'
BELOW CURB OPENINGS FOR DISTANCE
OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF CURB OPENINGS
BOTTOM OF
BIORETENTION
BASIN
SET BOTTOM OF CURB PER
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT TO
FOR PAVEMENT STABILITY AND
TO AVOID WATER INFILTRATION
UNDER PAVEMENT
INSTALL 4" MIN DIA. APPROVED
COBBLE 0.2 FEET BELOW CURB
OPENINGS FOR DISTANCE OF 2'
EITHER SIDE OF CURB OPENINGS.
SEE PLAN VIEW FOR LOCATION
CURB & GUTTER
PLACE 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED
COBBLE 0.2' BELOW CURB
OPENINGS FOR DISTANCE OF 2'
EITHER SIDE OF CURB OPENINGS
PERFORATED PIPE (SLOPE AT 0.50% MIN)
W/ PERFORATIONS DOWN. SEE PLAN FOR
LENGTH AND LOCATION.
12" MIN. OF CLASS II
PERMEABLE ROCK
PER CALTRANS SPECS.
ROCK SECTION TO
INCREASE WITH
SLOPE OF PIPE.
12" MIN. OF CLASS II PERMEABLE ROCK
PER CALTRANS SPECS. ROCK SECTION TO
INCREASE WITH SLOPE OF PIPE.
WALL W/ WATERPROOF
MEMBRANE PER
STRUCTURAL PLANS.
WATERPROOF MEMBRANE PER
STRUCTURAL PLANS.
BIO-TREATMENT
SOIL MIX (BSM)
PER SPECS.
CURB OPENING
(SEE DETAIL AND
PLAN FOR LOCATION)
PERFORATED PIPE (SLOPE AT 0.50% MIN)
W/ PERFORATIONS DOWN. SEE PLAN FOR
LENGTH AND LOCATION.
3 12" MIN. OF CLASS II PERMEABLE ROCK
PER CALTRANS SPECS. ROCK SECTION TO
INCREASE WITH SLOPE OF PIPE.
VARIES
PERFORATED PIPE
(SLOPE AT 0.50% MIN)
W/ PERFORATIONS DOWN.
SEE PLAN FOR LENGTH
AND LOCATION.
3:1 MAX
18"
CLEANOUT
W/ CAP AT
FINISH GRADE
VARIES
SEE PLAN
VARIES
SEE PLAN
PLACE 4" MIN. DIA. APPROVED COBBLE
0.2' BELOW CURB OPENINGS FOR
DISTANCE OF 2' EITHER SIDE OF CURB
OPENINGS.
PLACE GEOTEXTILE BETWEEN
COBBLES & NATIVE SOIL
FOR EROSION CONTROL.
SOLID OVERFLOW PIPE
BIORETENTION BASIN W/ LINER
IMPERMEABLE LINER
N.T.S.
CHRISTY V12
OR APPROVED EQUAL
OVERFLOW RISER
W/ GRATE
BIO-TREATMENT
SOIL MIX (BSM)
PER SPECS.
RISER HEIGHT SEE TCM
SUMMARY TABLE
0.2"
8"
MIN.
VARIES
STORMWATER
CONTROL NOTES &
DETAILS
C4.02
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
.... _..,._., __ ... ~-- ==::..."'":":=::-:;;-••1----...
Ellelr11irotnlCMIU1kd101nc1
Ti,,a~m--,--. ... -an.-...---.a...ana
ll!Ml9dlnlflll~IM6<ttM'·i,,11'14~-NNNN~
,,._(,tlll',""r~l...--ftl~•ll~-li~O,~""'
Nl)H Ill /91Mt.-nwil. Ill M tr...,.,.,_-•~ 0.0.~ 11,it ~ OOIIWIQ-11\Mlllll,_~_.IMllilllQ,klllllllallylllllliC.afll'I -P1emlhM .. ~1fllrll!IIMl.dmffl.and'IMlmlJCVllOMkntlllNldbl -w ... 111.-..--u.1 ~-p&aN•--1n,-.ana
f9tlillf9r,DN!lillw..wwt. ... 9"dirt91 .. ~,.,.._l"II ~,,......
OllfflPIIIWl1lltillualllanll--~IUffl-,w~ m;,rie~
..-Jh~flll'!IMl!MI'~ 'l"lt:'~t!"'Jpliytlo!l!ll'~Mt __ ..,,.llngorwnlnlllicilir{1frNlf)an_reciu .... M.dlore.Ml'IIIM M~
N4",111..,.__,.ie'~~.1,11,.;,r,n,,11...,,.111 ......... !+'IOl'INII-M\i!tlll\l4iil and~--CllqllNClordll .. NdV~!IPA 111911) Dl ... -.d
...--Dllf-KH,_..wigpr-11,_. __ llll•iO-H•N
1st.nlpo1NM IIMP.hfillh!lllltnlilllDar..t.nryatirKtrt.habllallllllrnot<IIMlll1 --"""'1•~ .. QfNQl'llyllfjl,NO --lly~.,,,♦HllluKwM'I
~wall!' NlMIM inl~ ,a, Mffl~ ~ ll'eW\lllll!r!IM llll,lll'and _,-. lllMllffl llllr.HGNp,gflll Wilnlionralff .,..,_.,.., llljlf-,it~llflll ~trf/;l,f,hiY1';te,,hft,ilfl "'fdi:Ml6r\,~1111,1Pf .. lll~li:I trwHianll'IACWHIM .. ~lwCIIHcalllil -n:l'NNIM_U_
•~nl~ftffll~N~~~
:.:r1,W).::'.~ ~~~::.:-,.::::: ~~ =., a.r:
~Ol'wl\tf'IN._Ml)o',t.lGi"""".,,.,.,.li~ 8'it(.,11(411y,N.,..._. .. N, f«lllftll'llldl~~twoklll'INy... INhauQhll)oll!UtNl9m.ylll ---♦IHl--aNIIN M.-1.--,,;i-GIMMpilllflll
ll!lt!Mlll'll!ll'l'Wllftlll'I
A«umulMllll'llil>nftdllbti1,..._all._...,.■.IMw!llllw~Ml111!1lfllll)lbl 1111pnm..,--lunallln 0Nfpg11111■H11111:MMrljHCIIIMnlall VIQlll..,.,_ ■o,1.,; ~ ..-,,-11...,_~, ~~
~uw-cn1n,-,.,_m;IIHlilawlL'UCIIHII Thaftlaallll1111pa1YWl!y 1'1ti!h~1•~0tll«~fll"'Mltill,,.6'1wllbl.........,,~r,..,. 111M Dlplndlnglanpol.Unllolldl,IOllll!lllyllNdlClbl~~~lO}'N'IU 4(11',!i~(llO,lWQI
,,_l(Jll(/M(lj)~~~•~<"Nf~-~
-
----.,
_,..._
MITH UN
-+ IMI -I-
D
STORMWATER
CONTROL CALCULATIONS
C4.03
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
1570 Oakland Road(408) 487-2200
San Jose, CA 95131HMHca.com
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
05/25/2022
1927400
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
a;;i..-$1
--~-L.a..:l
DiL--
~~=:~·-~:: "-----·- ---. .. ~.
MITH UN
-+ IMI -I-
-··
D
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
ELECTRIC AND GAS SERVICE REQUIREMENTS
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
JT-1
05/25/2022
21-086
JOINT TRENCH TITLE
SHEET
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
1 04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
5/18/2022 9:42:55 AM
PROJECT
SITE
,n~~s-,0t
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
~ll;SlALL
~T>.LL
~L
~T>.LL ..
EtCAVAT'()N
fl~LY~MEB PMS
EtCAVAT'Ot
.Q0000
eoooo
,0000•
,0000•
.. ,0000•
,0000• ... ,0000•
Elfl!;Ji'ffmffft6 & IJWi5EPMR ,0000•
~
~L
m~~f&SfrM!LIMFS
E~CAVAllON.
illrwl~f &S:tJTAL~Al)
,0000•
,0oeoo
,0000•
,0000•
.Q0000
.Q0000
~TALL .Q000e
CAT&~fis~fS .Q000e
EXCAVAllON. .Q000e
c,rc flflRCoNPurr _I.CCEPlED _DEal\lo
'lU'PLY&IN'.SlALL .Q0000
CIEC flfJRSPIICEBOX£S_ACC[PlED _DECU~D
SU'PLY&11;SlALL ,.()0000
mAVAllON. , .. .()0000
PIR~~& ?!~\1/CON!A£~ Atfl 80BE .Q0000
.Q0000
• r~~~~1~:.:r~& 1Sr~TY T~o:=t BY
ONOT!J'P\.J01!ll[LfUSS0llU1WISESPEGfl[D
----------------------<
Tl£SE Pl.ANS WERE PREPARED IN CONJUtCIK»I 'MTH THE roL.LOWING Pl.ANS:
!!.QJfi I. rn'(ff~ ~~DuWC,'/li-\tsc~i:fillil.ED IN Ni HlE.I n111 CAN BE PLlfflrn 2' ~~d)~~&~fM~l,IJrfc%~oRE£ ~~LAloc1mi WJ,R~~ M~J.
Q) S'.NOBACl(f'U
© 5· SECO!O,RY COl<lUT
® ® ,·uamELICIRICClRO.JIT
(]) 5"PRl=COIOUTS
®
®
@
!!.QJfi 1. [,~fi.Jo~l'W • .JilFfl1c:ffi\m:~;smR m>CAL [L[CTRC rno,CH SECTOOS /HJ 2 . .w&ll,l,IDEPTHI.I05EPl<lATONREl).,l,[1,CNT'SBCT'liEING,!,'S,D,TV,IHJT[lIPHQN[ CONDUITSTDBEPRCl/lUBi'TH[RESPECT'-'EIJTUT(S
3,DEPTHNiOBAD(FUREl).,l,0,CNlSf'OR.()l<llR[..-:a'SfjPUlJCRWTOfWI.YS>l'.LL COl,f'LY WITH CIT'( Cf' SH,/11, CLNl.l. ENGNEIRING DEPIIRlUENT Sl/o/'HWID SPECJlCAlJCll/S
4. JOlf/1 TRENCH COflSffilJCTON REQJl<[!CNl'l APP\.YwtCN Ail LITLITYSU!SffilJCTURES AREINSTI.I.LrnATTH'SIJ.ETIUE
------------------------------------------
4"SAfllP
~Wtr
PERIJTUTYCOll'I.NY PERl/Tl.lTYCOIS'IW'f
,JOINT TRENCH OVFR WATER & S S & S D
'11'DTH Pffi Sil[ & r.lJUl£R Of OCH UTILITY. PG.t[ AND CITY INSPl'CTOR TO OCIERl,U£ r.lETHOO Of Cl!OSSJIIG GENERAi NOTES·
TH'PR[HRR[DTRENCHLOCI.TONISINI.PUElJCIJTUTY[ASBUIT(P,U,E.). 2 AilDEPTI-IS#IJRESU.TINGCCIIERREOUl<O.UIToAREIOSUREDFROUFlN/.1..GR.'OC. ~
MIYCHANGESTOTHISDESK)N
MUST BE APPROVED BY
CONSTRUCTION NOTES·
ALLIRENCltNG,BACKFllLf..CANDlflS[lti,\l(]NBYCOOTRAClORUUSlOOl,PI.YiillHPG&[UOSl.wJARDS.545.J (EFf[CT'-'E DI.I[ 7-~-2000) AND SIL(ON VI.I.LEY POWER SllJO'iPD DOC\JU[t,T UG-1000 UTILllY APPROVALS
AT&:T(PHONE)
COMCAST(CATV)
.llEYEl.QEE8;
CHARITIES HOUSING
1400 PARKMOOR AVE
SAN JOSE, CA 95126
HAI NGUYEN
T: 408-550-8314
E: HNGUYENCICHARITIESHOUSING.ORG
:1£,U !N9o;, =====----,
JT-2 JOINT
JT-J JOfNT
- MITHUN
D
STOP
EVEV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
W W W W
W
W
IRR
SSSSSS
W
/
/
/
/
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
FDC
25 19
19 20
20 CONCRETE
APRON
25 19
CONCRETE
APRON
19 20
25 18
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
JT-2
05/25/2022
21-086
JOINT TRENCH
COMPOSITE
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
1 04.08.2022
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
5/18/2022 9:42:55 AM
GPA RESUBMISSION 1
- MITHUN
~QIE IQ CQ!:lIBM:IQB·
FOR CONTRACTOR'S WORK RESPONSIBILITY,
-PRELIMINARY-REFER TO JOINT TRENCH TITLE SHEET {JT-1)
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LEGEND
R
84" x 75" THREE PHASE TRNGORMER PAD (S\IP)
WORKING SP.fCE SHOWN 'MTH 8' APRON
@] ~~ AA£~ X 7' PRIWAR'( MANHCl.E (!M')
D ~~ AA~f~ X 7' PRI~ MANHCl.E (SW)
C PROPOSED 30' x 60' x 24"SPUCE BOX (SVP)
0 PROPOSED24"xJ6"x24'SPLJCEBOX(S\IP)
0 PROPOSED 17° x 30• 1 24"SPUCE BOX (S\IP)
D PROPOSED 30' x 48" 1 30' Sl.11 BOX {AT&T)
-
PROPOSED20"x42°124"B-#(r.A1V)
-
PROPOSED 20" x 42" 1 24" SPLICE BOX (C.LE.C.)
-JT-EXISTINGJOINTTRENCH
-o-EXISTINGGASUNE
. EXISTINGELEClRICliWIHOLE
.. EXISTINGS\IPVAULTTOBCREI.OCATED
SUBSTRUCTURE LOCATIONS MUST BE STAKED BY A
LICENSED SURVEYOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTES ON JOINT TRENCH TITLE
SHEET (JT-1) REGARDING EXISTING CONDITIONS.
0 10 20 w
~ I
CIVIC CENTER DR
D
~1£,U !N~7;, =:c-;;;~~,
JT-2 JIJINT
JT-3 JOINT
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATEREVISION
CHECK
DATEISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
JT-3
05/25/2022
21-086
JOINT TRENCH SECTIONS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.202150% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
1 04.08.2022
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
5/18/2022 9:42:55 AM
GPA RESUBMISSION 1
-PRELIMINARY-
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
--36"--
);,
CSD
12"MIN ~
c--tTI
i>l
--36"--
[I]
SECTION HS
SECTION U
--36"--
~-iCSD
~
IT]
--36"--
[I]
4" SANDBED
SECTION H6
SECTION U1
i>l
--36"
--36"--
4" SA.NOBE□ 4"SANDBED
SECTION H SECTION H1
--36"--
~i
--36"--
4'' SANDBED
"'z
~!-f--'---'-12"M~,N~ITJ-s _61J_._,I
4"SANDBED
SECTION H7 SECTION H8
SECTION V SECTION W1
--36"--
CSD
12"MIN ~
~
--36"--
12"MING!
SECTION W2
--36"--
--36"--
1dl
____r---12_"MI_N.,_ -~-61J-}
4'' SANDBED
SECTION P1
ABBREVIATIONS:
[E] PRl~ARY (SVP)
SECTION X
c::-::----::----==c-----------, -------------[fil SECONDARY (SVP) fill STREETUGHT(SVP)
f---------~~-----------j [g CATV (COMCAST)
IT] PHONE (AT&T) ~1r,u IN~7:, ==~~----,
IQ) GAS (PG&E)
[[] flBEROPTIC(c.L.E.C.)
JT-2 JOINT
JT-3 JOINT
- MITHUN
D
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE
PLAN - LEVEL 1
LINCOLN STREET
EXISTING CHURCH
NEW AFFORDABLE
MULTIFAMILY
BUILDING
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
1927400
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
CIVIC CENTER
FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work
2585 UNIVERSITY AVE.
SAN DIEGO, CA 92104
T: 619.269.4423
05/25/2022
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
CHECK
NO. DATEREVISION
DATEISSUE
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
08.23.2021GPA APPLICATION SET
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 1ANORTH
L1.0
EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
6 77
D D
5 5
LOW DECORATIVE GARDEN WALL (36" MAX).
ACTIVE FORECOURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & TREE GRATE.
PASSIVE FORECOURT WITH TREE GRATE, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & SOFTER PAVING MATERIALS (D.G. /DECORATIVE PEA-GRAVEL PAVING).
CONCRETE WALKWAY.
EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO REMAIN.
NEW PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
PRIVATE RESIDENT PATIOS.
LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS KEY
5 3
2 1
7 6
9 10
11 12
13 16
17 18
19 20
21 EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN.
STORMWATER TREATMENT BASIN: SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
PRIMARY ENTRY COURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING AND CONCRETE SEATWALLS WITH WOOD SLATS.
TREE WELLS IN SIDEWALK @ CIVIC CENTER DRIVE.
CONTIGUOUS LANDSCAPED PARKWAY @ LINCOLN STREET.
NEW 6-FT PERFORATED METAL PANEL FENCE (WITH MAINTENANCE ACCESS) TO MATCH TRASH ENCLOSURE AND OTHER BUILDING GUARDRAILS. SEE ARCH.
DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO.
SHORT-TERM BIKE PARKING (QTY: 8 BIKES).
DRIVEWAY.
STEPPED CONCRETE PERIMETER.
RAISED RECREATIONAL AREA WITH SYNTHETIC TURF.
RAISED PLANTERS.
LANDSCAPE BOULDERS OR SMOOTH CONCRETE FAUX BOULDERS.
DINING COURT WITH BBQ COUNTER.
RECREATION AREA WITH OUTDOOR PING PONG TABLE & SEATING.
BREAK-OUT SPACE WITH SEATING.
D.G. PATHWAY (EMERGENCY ACCESS).
22 23
4 8
15 14
9 11
9 12
CANDIDATE PLANT LEGEND
13 8
8 8
CONCEPTUAL SITE LIGHTING KEY
14 4
4 F
F
9 1
1 1
2 3
4 4
6 6
77 9
9 9
9 9 9 9
1014
14 4
15 12
4 23
STREET TREES
UTILITY & TREE PROTECTION NOTES:
r-,;-,5-"0-l'--o·-· -----------------o/<'.][:J
MIN5'0FSEPARATIONISPRO\r1DEOBETWEENTREESANDUTILITIES.'M,ENLOCATED'MTHIN 5'AROOTBARRIERl'l1LLBEPRO\r1DED
ROOT BARRIERS FOR SIDEWALK PROTECTION WILL BE 16' LONG OR EXTEND TO DRIP LINE ('I;:
Tl-lEMATURETREE,AND'MLLBE1.5'DEEP,ANOCENTEREDONTREES
STREET TREES FRONTING THE PRD.ECT SITE ALONG Tl-IE PUBLIC R.O.W. WILL BE COORDINATED Will-I STREET DEPARTMENT AND CITY ARBORIST FOR THE TYPE, LOCATION, INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE.
-~ 12' POLE LIGHT
EB BOLLARD LIGHT
RECESSED STEP LIGHT
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 ~
~
BOTANICALNAME(COMMONNAME)
PROJECT STREET TREES:
LINCOLN STREET·
O
OLEAEUROPAEA·sw
0 ANHILL'
(FRUITLESS OLIVE)
Cl\r1CCENTERDRIVE
CERCISCANADENSIS
(EASTERN REDBUD)
ENTRY COURT TREE (SUCH AS)
ELI<OVs S. 'CITY SPR'11''
DWARF ZELKOVA)
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL'
FRUITLESS OLIVE)
CERCISOCCIOENTALIS
WESTERN REDBUD)
YRUSC.'CAPITAL'
CAPITAL FLOWERING PEAR)
l.£VEL 2 COURTYARD TREES (SUCH AS)·
(FRUITI.fSSOLIVE)
HEIGHT(FT)
36" BOX V.LOW
36"BOX MOO
24"BOX MOO
36" BOX V. LOW
2-4" BOX V. LOW 15-20
2-4" BOX MOD 25-J5
O
OLEAEUROPAEA'SWANHILL' 36"BOX V.LOW
AGONIS F. 'AFTER OARK' 24" BOX LOW 15-20
(AFTER DARK PEPPERMINT TREE)
CHITALPA TASHKENTESIS 24" BOX MOO 20-30
(CHITALPA)
PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOLIUM 15-GAL MOD 15-25
(KOHUHU)
ROBINIAP.'PURPL.£ROBE'
(PURPLE ROBE LOCUST)
24" BOX LOW
PRUNUSCAROLINIANA 24"BOX
(CAROLINA CHERRY)
SECONDARYACCENTTREES(SUCHAS)
O
ACERPAL.MATUM'RHOOEISLANDRE0'15-GAL
(JAPANESE MAPLE)
ARBUTUS'MARINA' 15-GAL
(MARINA MADRON[)
O
LOPHOSTEMONCONFERTUS 15-GAL
(BRISBANE BOX)
ACACIASTENOPH\'LLA 15-GAL
(SHOE-STRING ACACIA)
COTINUS COGGYGRIA 15-GAL
(SMOKETREE)
PARKINGAREATREES(SUCHAS)
ORHUSLANCEA 24"BOX
(AFRICAN SUMAC)
GEl.£RAPAR\r1FlORA 24"BOX
o(AUSTRALIANl'l1LLOW)
PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOUUM 15-GAL
(KOHUHU)
STORMWATER TREATMENT PLANTINGS (SUCH AS):
CAREXSPP 1GAL
(SEDGE)
MUHLENBERGIASPP 1GAL
(MUHLY)
JIJNCUSSPP. 1GAL
(RUSH)
CAREXSUBFUSCA 1GAL
(RUSTY SEDGE)
SHRUBS/SUCCUL.£NTS/GROUNDCOVERS/VINES (SUCH AS):
m:Jl
LEPTOSPERMUMS.CVS 5GAL
(DWFTEATREE)
WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA 5GAL
(COAST ROSEMARY)
RHAMNUSC.'EVECASE' SGAL
(DWl"COFFEEBERRY)
LOMANORALONGIFOLIA'TANIKA' SGAL
(TANIKALOMANDRA)
GRE\r1LLEA'NOELLII' SGAL
(NOEL'SGREVILLEA)
ACACIA 'COUSIN ITT SGAL
(DWI" RIVER WATTLE)
ARCTOSTAPH\'LOSSPP. SGAL
(MANZANITA)
ASPARAGUSD.'MYERS' 1GAL
(MYER'S FERN)
DIETESBICOLOR 1GAL
(FORTNIGHT LILY)
CHONDROPETALUMTECTORUM 1GAL
(CAPE RUSH)
POLYSTICHUMMUNITUM 1GAL
(WESTERN SWORD FERN)
MYOPORUMSPP 1GAL
(CREEPINGMYOPORUM)
LANTANASELlOWIANA 1GAL
(TRAILING LANTANA)
ERIGERONKAR\r1NSKIANUS 1GAL
(SANTA BARBARA DAISY)
ROSEMARINUS SPP. 1GAL
(ROSEMARY)
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LOW
LOW
,oo
,oo
NOD
LOW
LOW
LOW
,00
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
,oo
LOW
LOW
NOO
LOW
LOW
LOW
LOW
20-4()
15-25
LJ'\
'
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
1927400
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
CIVIC CENTER
FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work
2585 UNIVERSITY AVE.
SAN DIEGO, CA 92104
T: 619.269.4423
05/25/2022
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
CHECK
NO. DATEREVISION
DATEISSUE
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
08.23.2021GPA APPLICATION SET
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE
PLAN - LEVEL 2
CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN - LEVEL 2ANORTH
L2.0
LOW DECORATIVE GARDEN WALL (36" MAX).
ACTIVE FORECOURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & TREE GRATE.
PASSIVE FORECOURT WITH TREE GRATE, SEATING, LANDSCAPE BOULDERS & SOFTER PAVING MATERIALS (D.G. /DECORATIVE PEA-GRAVEL PAVING).
CONCRETE WALKWAY.
EXISTING PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO REMAIN.
NEW PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
PRIVATE RESIDENT PATIOS.
LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS KEY
5 3
2 1
7 6
9 10
11 12
13 16
17 18
19 20
21 EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN.
STORMWATER TREATMENT BASIN: SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
PRIMARY ENTRY COURT WITH ENHANCED PAVING AND CONCRETE SEATWALLS WITH WOOD SLATS.
TREE WELLS IN SIDEWALK @ CIVIC CENTER DRIVE.
CONTIGUOUS LANDSCAPED PARKWAY @ LINCOLN STREET.
NEW 6-FT PERFORATED METAL PANEL FENCE (WITH MAINTENANCE ACCESS) TO MATCH TRASH ENCLOSURE AND OTHER BUILDING GUARDRAILS. SEE ARCH.
DRAWINGS FOR MORE INFO.
SHORT-TERM BIKE PARKING (QTY: 8 BIKES).
DRIVEWAY.
STEPPED CONCRETE PERIMETER.
RAISED RECREATIONAL AREA WITH SYNTHETIC TURF.
RAISED PLANTERS.
LANDSCAPE BOULDERS OR SMOOTH CONCRETE FAUX BOULDERS.
DINING COURT WITH BBQ COUNTER.
RECREATION AREA WITH OUTDOOR PING PONG TABLE & SEATING.
BREAK-OUT SPACE WITH SEATING.
D.G. PATHWAY (EMERGENCY ACCESS).
22 23
4 8
15 14
IRRIGATION DESIGN STATEMENT
·
·
·
·
·
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT STANDARDS
IRRIGATION FIGURES
MAWA
ETWU
·
TURF AREA
CONCEPTUAL SITE LIGHTING KEY
LANDSCAPE WATER EFFICIENCY CHECKLIST
SEE L1.0 FOR PLANT LEGEND
16 17
18 18
18 18
18 19
77 77
21 20
EE
C
C
2323
22 IRRIGATION DESIGN FOR RECYCLED WATER:
1-,-;16-.. c-,·--0-.. ---------------,:JD
0 0
0 0
0 0
-~ 12' POLE LIGHT 0
0 0 EB BOLLARD LIGHT
0 0
-
RECESSED STEP LIGHT
0 0
TOTAL ... REA:13829SF"
STORMW ... TER ... REA: 1689 Sf
ALLOTI-IERL ... NDSCAPEAREAS:12140SF
(49.4)(0.62)(0.58x13829SF)K245,662GAL/!1s
(49.4)(0.62)(0.Jx12140Sf)/0.9K12J,941G,,.Lf,1.
(49.4)(0.62)(0.5x1689SF")/0.9K28,739GAL/!1s
TOTAL-152,680 GAL/YR
Tl-IE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED TO REDUCE Tl-IE OVERALL WATER REQUIRED FOR SUPPLEMENTAL IRRIG ... TION. ALONG ~~R~i 1:~f[f1~~N~~ci:~~s ~[LL~~T u~~ii~6A~, OROER
TO COMPLY BOTI-1 1111TH THE STATE AND CITY WATER
CONSERVATIONOROINANCES.THESEINQ.UDEET-8ASEO'SM ... RT'
~~~~~lff<i: 6~~: l~l~AR:: !~NDS~Ei'P~~~~o~E?"-auu~~LERS PRESSURIZED MAINLINE PIPING \'<ILL BE CL. 315 PVC. &
BURIEDf,HNIMUM18"
NON-PRESSURIZEOLATERALSWILLBESCH.40PVCORCL
315 PVC & BURIED MINIMUM 12"
AN 'RP'-TYPE 8ACKflOW PREVENTER WILL BE INSTALLED
NEAR TI-IEPRO.CCTPOINT-OF-CONNECTION
SUBSIJRFACEIN-LJNEDRIPIRRIGATIONSHALLBETORO
DL2000,NETAFIM,ORAPPROVEDEQIJIVALENT,
NO OVERHEAD OR SPRAY IRRIGATION WILL BE UTILIZED
ALL ONSITE IRRIGATION WILL BE DESIGNED FOR RECYCLED WATER USE AND WILL COMPLY WITH ALL RECYU..ED WATER REGULATIONS BYCITYOFSANT ... CL ... RA,S81\RANDDEP ... RTMENTOFDRINKING WATER
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
LJ'\
'
EXISTING TREE PLAN
LINCOLN STREET
NEW AFFORDABLE
MULTIFAMILY
BUILDING
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
1927400
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
CIVIC CENTER
FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work
2585 UNIVERSITY AVE.
SAN DIEGO, CA 92104
T: 619.269.4423
05/25/2022
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
CHECK
NO. DATEREVISION
DATEISSUE
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
08.23.2021GPA APPLICATION SET
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
141
EXISTING TREE PLANANORTH
L3.0
EXISTING TREE KEY
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
EXISTING TREE LEGEND
EXISTING TREE NOTES
150149
148
147
146
132
133
134
135
136
137
139
140
142143138
144
145
SUMMARY:
If I
IL
---------------
1 ... ~
_J_
:E
r-1/-16-"c-7'--Q-" --------------~/~[Y
Q =PROTECT IN PLACE
X -TO BE REMOVED
t
t
---------,l
X
\
\.l
X
CONDITION
1-POOR
I TREETYPE DIA.(IN) 5-EXCELHNT ACTlON
OLIVc
OllVc
OLIVc
SWEETGUM
S\lr'EETGUM
S\lr'EETGUM
OLIVc
SWEETGUM
SWEETGUM
OllVc
PURPL£LEAFPLUt.1
OllVc
AFRICANFERNPINE
AFRICANFERNPINE
OllVc
OllVc
OllVc
OllVc
OllVc
11,7,7
16,9,5
16,15
11,7,7,4
13,10
4,3,3,2
16,15
10,10,9
17,14
12,10,70,9
res
"°
res
"°
"°
"° res
"°
"° ,cs
"° ,cs
"°
"° ,cs
,cs
"° ,cs
,cs
1 INFORMATION CONTAINED HERE IS TAKEN FROM ARBORIST'S REPORT PREPAREDBYHORTSCIENCE/8ARTLETTCONSULTING(325RAYST.,
PL.£ASANTON,CA94566)DATE003-06-2020.
2 TREENUMBERINGCONVENTIONUSEDSOASTOALIGNWITHNUMBERINGUSEO IN ARBORIST'S REPORT.
3 'M-IERETREESHAOMORETiiANTRUNK,THEDIAMETERSOFINDIVIDUAL
TRUNKS WERE ADDEO TOGETHER TO ESTABLISH THE DIAMETER CLASS FOR f.HTIGATIONPURPOSES
4. TREESINL£GENDt.1ARKED WIT11 ASTERISK(•): NOTINCWDEDIN
PRELIMINARY ARBORIST'S REPORT
MIN 24" BOX TREES PROVIDED•:
'TREES PERMITTED BY T11E CITY FOR REMOVAL WILL BE REPLACED AT A MINIMUM 2:1 RATIO WIT11 24-INCH BOX SPECIMEN TREES
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
RHWVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
REMOVE
Uwl
E
LJ'\
'
SUPPLEMENTAL
LANDSCAPE EXHIBITS
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
1927400
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
CIVIC CENTER
FAMILY HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E form/work
2585 UNIVERSITY AVE.
SAN DIEGO, CA 92104
T: 619.269.4423
05/25/2022
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
CHECK
NO. DATEREVISION
DATEISSUE
12.08.2020PLANNING SUBMITTAL
08.23.2021GPA APPLICATION SET
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
04.08.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.25.2022GPA RESUBMISSION 2
L4.0
CROSS-SECTION THROUGH LEVEL 1 COURTYARDD
CROSS-SECTION THROUGH LEVEL 2 COURTYARDE
CROSS-SECTION THROUGH LEVEL 2 COURTYARDC CROSS-SECTION @ FORECOURT & COURTYARDFLANDSCAPE ELEMENT IMAGERYB
CONCEPTUAL LIGHTING IMAGERYA
3/16"=1'-0"
3/16"=1'-0"
ENHANCED
PAVING 0
FORECOURT
LLINCOL.N7 STREET
TREEUPLIGHT
POLE LIGHT WALL LIGHT
PASSIVE FORECOURT AREA-CASUAL, QUIET, SOFT PAV1NG
MATERIALS
BOLLARD LIGHT
LJ\ ------------\
--
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SETB
ACK LINE
FIRE HYDRANT
STREET LIGHT
PROPOSED TREE, SEE LANDSCAPE
DRAWINGS
PROJECT NORTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.
LINCOLN ST.
5 STORY APARTMENTS
5 STORY APARTMENTS
SETBACK
LEVEL-2
COURTYARD
(E) TRANSFORMER
(N) TRANSFORMER
S.J.T.D, S.E.D.
(E) WOOD FENCE
O/ 2-3' RETAINING WALL
(E) FENCE
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR
PARKING ACCESS
ELEVATOR
PENTHOUSE
PRIMARY ENTRY
FOURCOURT
1651 TRITON CT
1661 TRITON CT
1671 TRITON CT
1681 TRITON CT
1691 TRITON CT
1700 LINCOLN ST
1701 TRITON CT
(N) LANDSCAPE WALL,
S.L.D.
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE
E E
T
G
FH
(N) SIDEWALK
(N) WATER AND FIRE ,
SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
STAIR ACCESS
TO ROOF
25'-0"
SIDEWALK
10'-0"
SETBACK
5'-0"
SETBACK
67'-7"
SETBACK
10'-0"
5'-0" MIN. SETBACK
6'-0"
(N) IRRIGATION
SERVICE WITH
BACKFLOW
PREVENTER, S.C.D.
STAIR ACCESS
TO ROOF
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR GARAGE
PARKING ACCESS, S.C.D.
15'-0"
10'-0"
35'-0"
(N) DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND
PULL SERVICES
SEE NOTES BELOW FOR TRASH SERVICES.
FH
FH TRASH STAGING AREA
_______2
A1.01
(N) NEW FENCE AND GATE, S.L.D.
SIDEWALK
EASEMENT
5'-6"
10'-0" 4'-6"
1. FOR TRASH PICK UP, PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING:
A. A DEDICATED PATH ADJACENT TO THE GARAGE DRIVEWAY IS PROVIDED FOR PUSH AND PULL SERVICES.
B. COLLECTION TRUCK WILL PARK ON THE STREET, AND WORKER WILL ACCESS THE STAGING
AREA VIA THE DEDICATED PATH, WILL ROLL THE BINS OUT TO THE STREET TO BE SERVICED BY THE TRUCK, THEN RETURN TO THE STAGING AREA. BINS WILL NOT REMAIN ON THE STREET.
C. COLLECTION FOR RECYCLING AND GARBAGE WILL OCCUR ON SEPARATE DAYS.
D. BINS WILL BE MAXIMUM 3 CUBIC YARD.
NOTES:
ASSUMED STREET PARKING ZONE
TRASH COLLECTION TRUCK
(SHOWN FOR REFERENCE)DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH
PUSH AND PULL SERVICE.
MANEUVERING SHOWN IN RED
DASH FOR REFERENCE.
SEE NOTES BELOW FOR DETAILS
ON TRASH SERVICES.
TRASH STAGING AREA
TRASH ROOM INSIDE BUILDING.
FOR MORE DETAILS ON TRASH
ROOM AND STAGING AREA, REFER
TO /1 A8.50
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:10:50 PM
A1.01
05/25/2022
1927400
ARCHITECTURAL SITE
PLAN
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUS
ING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/16" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
1/16" = 1'-0"2 SITE PLAN -TRASH COLLECTION
_J
_j
- ----\
a
o---0
0 MITH UN
:G - CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/S l.-..'G
C
E9
260 SF 250 SF309 SF
FDC
A
A3.12
3 A3.12
3 M SHOP
102
BIKE RM
103
PANTRY
105B
COMMUNITY RM
105
KITCHEN
STAIR 1
ST1.1
A3.12
1 A3.12
1 A3.12
2 A3.12
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
2 108 CLASS 1 BIKE RACKS
42 REQ'D
STAIR 2
ST2.1
RR
109
OFFICE
106A
ELEV. CTRL.
107
FIRE PUMP
118
DWH
117
A3.11
1 A3.11
1 ELEC RM
116
MPOE /TEL
115
PRIMARY ENTRY
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 96.45.3 5.5
13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 32'-8" 6'-0" 73'-11" 23'-3" 13'-2" 45'-3"
GARAGE EXHAUST
OVERHEAD
GARAGE DOOR
/4 A8.02
EERC
110
/4 A8.02
PARKING
P1
73' - 6"
HEAT RM
120
MTG RM
106D
74' - 10 1/2"
74' - 11 3/8"
74' - 10 1/2"
74' - 8 1/2"
TENANT
SERVICES
106C
SERVER &
COPY
106B
STOR.
105A
CORRIDOR
SOUTH
C1A
TRASH
101
111
3BR-D112
2BR-A
114
2BR-A
113
SBR-D
LAUNDRY
104
LOBBY
L1
MAIL
FRONT
DESK
JAN.
108
STOR.
L1A
STORAGE
119
/2 A8.01
/1 A8.06
DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH
PUSH AND PULL SERVICES
72' - 8 13/32"
A3.01b
1 A3.01b2
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 A3.03b 3
ELEVATOR
2 ELEVATOR
1 _______1
A8.10
1.82%
4.68%
BOLLARDS
PROJECT NORTH
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SETB
ACK LINE
FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANELFACP
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL
TAGS
NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES.
2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS.
3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS
INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D.
4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL
FLOOR CEILING TAGS.
5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:23:04 PM
A2.01
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-1
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
MITH UN
-----0
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
\
\
C
EB
A
224
SBR-A
212
3BR-B_3
207
2BR-B
205
3BR-B
201
2BR-B
203
SBR-A
209
SBR-A
211
3BR-B_2
220
2BR-B
A3.12
3 A3.12
3 226
2BR-B
COURTYARD
SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS
A3.12
1 A3.12
1 A3.12
2 A3.12
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
2 214
1BR-A
219
3BR-A
216
1BR-A
218
1BR-A
206
3BR-B
202
2BR-B
A3.11
1 A3.11
1 208
SBR-A
STAIR 2
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 96.45.3 5.5
32'-8" 6'-0" 73'-11" 23'-3" 13'-2" 45'-3"
47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
ELEC.
CLOSET
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
200D
222
2BR-B
204
SBR-A
221
3BR-B
223
1BR-A
STAIR 1
213
3BR-C
CL.
225
SBR-A
2'-0"
210
1BR-C
215
1BR-B
217
1BR-B
CTYD
COURTYARD
C2A
CORRIDOR SOUTH
C2B
CORRIDOR NORTH
STORAGE
200B
TRASH
200E
STOR
200A
ELEC.
CLOSET
10'-4 1/2"
4'-1"
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 A3.03b 3
JANITOR
F
02 FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK LINE
FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANELFACP
PROJECT NORTH
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL
TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES.
2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS.
3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS
INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D.
4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL
FLOOR CEILING TAGS.
5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
6/27/2022 2:23:13 PM
A2.02
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-2 PODIUM
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
1/8" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN - PODIUM
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
Q
---0
------ft
------1-----r--------------1---- ---0
i i i
i i i ----i-----t--------------i---- ---0
i i i
i i i
i i i
' ' '
I I I
----------- --1 ' ' ' ------t-----t------------------ ---0 '
I
'
I
0 ---0
--tt
---0
EB
-MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
f.: ----\_\
l j \
----- ------\
A
A3.12
3 A3.12
3 COURTYARD BELOW
A3.12
1 A3.12
1 A3.12
2 A3.12
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
1 A3.11
1 B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 96.45.3 5.5
47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
324
SBR-A
312
3BR-B_3
317
1BR-B
307
2BR-B
305
3BR-B
301
2BR-B
303
SBR-A
309
SBR-A
311
3BR-B_2
320
2BR-C
326
2BR-B
STAIR 1
ST1.3
314
1BR-A
319
3BR-A
316
1BR-A
318
1BR-A
306
3BR-B
304
SBR-A
308
SBR-A
STAIR 2
ST2.3
TRASH
300E
315
1BR-B
322
2BR-B
302
2BR-B
310
1BR-C
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
300D
STOR
300A
COURTYARD BELOW
321
3BR-B
323
1BR-A
ELEC.
CLOSET
CL.
2HR HORIZONTAL EXIT W/ 90 MIN. RATED
DOOR ON HOLD OPEN (CLOSES W/
ACTIVATION OF FIRE ALARM), TYP.
C3A
CORRIDOR SOUTH
C3B
CORRIDOR NORTH
313
3BR-C
STORAGE
300B
325
SBR-A
ELEC.
CLOSET
/7 A8.01
/6 A8.01
/1 A8.04
/1 A8.03 /2 A8.04 /5 A8.01 /3 A8.05
/2 A8.06
/2 A8.05/3 A8.02
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 A3.03b 3
JANITOR
SEISMIC JOINT
WALKWAY BRIDGE TO BE NON
COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION
F
10 FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK LINE
FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANELFACP
PROJECT NORTH
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL
TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES.
2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS.
3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS
INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D.
4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL
FLOOR CEILING TAGS.
5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:23:22 PM
A2.03
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-3-4
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 3-4 FLOOR PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
0 -----~-----~-------------+-------0
I I I
i i i
-----~-----~-------------+-------0
I I I I
i i i i
'
I i i i
I I I i i i
________________ j _____ i ______________ i -
◊
_____ i _____ i ------------- i -------0
I
'
I
'
I
n7
0 0
- -=- '1:J..-.... ........... .......j:r=7 .db..-t="t!------ ......&=7:!!6....~ +--+-..... ----lf=7 ~ -f=bciiiiiiii(:::Jl+ ............ ~ ~~dr=="4-I -------Q i
MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
EB
A
A3.12
3 A3.12
3 A3.12
1 A3.12
1 A3.12
2 A3.12
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
1 A3.11
1 B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 96.45.3 5.5
524
SBR-A
512
3BR-B_3
507
2BR-B
505
3BR-B
501
2BR-B
509
SBR-A
511
3BR-B_2
520
2BR-B
526
2BR-B
514
1BR-A
519
3BR-A
516
1BR-A
518
1BR-A
506
3BR-B
504
SBR-A508
SBR-A
515
1BR-B
ELEC
522
2BR-B
513
3BR-C
502
2BR-B
510
1BR-C
525
SBR-A
523
1BR-A
521
3BR-B
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
STAIR 2
ST2.5
CL.
2HR HORIZONTAL EXIT W/ 90 MIN. RATED
DOOR ON HOLD OPEN (CLOSES W/
ACTIVATION OF FIRE ALARM), TYP.
32'-8" 6'-0" 73'-11" 23'-3" 13'-2" 45'-3"
47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
C5A
CORRIDOR SOUTH
C5B
CORRIDOR NORTH
503
SBR-A
513
3BR-C
517
1BR-B
TRASH
STORAGE
STOR
STORAGE
STAIR 1
ST1.5
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 A3.03b 3
JANITOR
SEISMIC JOINT
PROJECT NORTH
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK LINE
FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANELFACP
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL
TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES.
2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS.
3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS
INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D.
4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL
FLOOR CEILING TAGS.
5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:23:27 PM
A2.05
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL-5
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL-5 FLOOR PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
Q Q Q MITH UN
------~-----~-------------~----- ---0
6 ------1-----t-------------1----- ---0 l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G i i i
i i i -----1 T 7----- ---0
i i i
i i i
'
I i i i
'
I I
-------r-----~-------------
i i i
---t-----t-------------i----- ---0
◊
6 -1
'
---0
- ---0
C
---0
EB
A
A3.12
3 A3.12
3 A3.12
1 A3.12
1 A3.12
2 A3.12
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
2 A3.11
1 A3.11
1 ROOF
BELOW
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 96.45.3 5.5
32'-8"
6'-0"
73'-11"
23'-3"
13'-2"
45'-3"
47'-0" 13'-2" 33'-7" 13'-2" 9'-10" 6'-4" 17'-5" 15'-3" 18'-5" 13'-2" 32'-5" 219'-10"
195'-8"
PHOTOVOLTAIC ARRAYS
SOLAR THERMAL ARRAYS
2.83%
4.25%
3.24%
3.24%
2.92%
4.76%
9.21%
3.24%
_______2
A2.06
_______3
A2.06
A3.02b
1 A3.02b
2 A3.03b
2 A3.03b 3
PROJECT NORTH
FLOOR PLAN LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK LINE
FIRE ACCESS CONTROL PANELFACP
G
H
128' - 9 3/32"2.08%
C
1 2.08%
FLOOR PLAN NOTES
1. SEE 8 SERIES FOR ENLARGED PLANS WITH INTERIOR WALL
TAGS NOT SHOWN IN OVERALLPLAN, INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
AND TYPICAL UNIT TYPES.
2. SEE EXITING DIAGRAMS FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS
BETWEEN FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETS.
3. FOR TYP. PLANTERS AND BIORETENTION PLANTERS
INFORMATION, S.L.D. AND S.C.D.
4. SEE BUILDING SECTIONS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TYPICAL
FLOOR CEILING TAGS.
5. SEE G SERIES FOR RATING DIAGRAMS FOR FIRE RATED WALL INFORMATION.
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:11:26 PM
A2.06
05/25/2022
1927400
ROOF PLAN
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF PLAN
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
ASSUME SCUPPER DRAIN WITH
OVERFLOW FOR ALL ROOF DRAIN,
UON., TYP.
1/8" = 1'-0"2 ROOF PLAN - PENTHOUSE N
1/8" = 1'-0"3 ROOF PLAN -PENTHOUSE S
'
I
-,
!
'
!
I '--------------------------
1 i --+--
: ◊
i
i
!
I
i
'
6 1
"Ct i
i
i
i
i
I
'
i
I
i
'
l__
I
i
'
!
I
i
i
'
I
i
i
-7
'
!
!
I
i
'
!
I
i
i
'
I
---7
i
'
I -,
I
i
i
I
i
-7--
,
I
i
i
'
!
!
oi
!
-,
!
I
i
'
!
I
i
I
i
' I
i
---7
i
i
-7
I
i
i
'
I
-T-
i
i
'
!
I
i
!
I
i
i
'
!
I ---r
I
i
'
----~-
I
i
i
I
j_ - --0
!
I
i
i
'
!
I
i
'
MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
C
EB
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE - WEST
45-DEG
REE
SETBA
CK PLANE
2 1A5
8 1C 10 #
PROPOSED
FDC 6B
AVERAGE GRADE ALONG
CIVIC CENTER DR.
73'-11"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
TYPE IIIA
3 2
TYPE I
1B
54'-6"
5"
58'-9 1/2" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG CIVIC CENTER DR.
2 6A8
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
SETBACK
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
1'-3 1/2"
73'-0"
TYPE IIIA
TYPE I
54'-6"
60'-6" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG LINCOLN STREET
AVERAGE GRADE
ALONG LINCOLN
72'-2 1/2"
3 1C 335 7 8
5 1B 2 1A 2 1A 1B 10
1C36B
6A 8
8 7
2 A3.01
1 A3.01
3 A3.03
2 A3.02
1 A3.03
2 A3.03
1 A3.02
STUCCO - WHITE
STUCCO - BLUE
STUCCO - LIGHT GREY
FIBER CEMENT PLANK
- DARK GREY
THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING;
ALT. FIBER CEMENT PLANK
NOT USED
MATERIAL LEGEND
1A
1B
1C
KEY
2 3
4 6A
6B
7 8
9 10
BRAKE METAL PANEL -DARK BRONZE
DARK BRONZE ALUM. WINDOW W/ SUNSHADE WHERE NOTED
DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUM. STOREFRONT
METAL ROLL UP DOOR
PERFORATED METAL PANEL; FENCE / GUARDRAIL
(NOT USED)
LOUVERS -PAINTED TO MATCH WINDOW
5 SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:11:49 PM
A3.01b
05/25/2022
1927400
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLAN NING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SOUTH ELEVATION - CIVIC CENTER DR
1/8" = 1'-0"2 EAST ELEVATION - LINCOLN ST.
~------ -------;', ------------------=---=---~ MITH UN
/ , ,
/
/
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 --- -$-
--- +
--- +
- -11- l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/S l.-..'G
I
_J ~--y---i
'
_J
C
2 A3.01
1 A3.01
3 A3.03
2 A3.02
1 A3.03
2 A3.03
1 A3.02
STUCCO - WHITE
STUCCO - BLUE
STUCCO - LIGHT GREY
CEMENT BOARD
- DARK GREY
THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING;
ALT. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL
NOT USED
MATERIAL LEGEND
1A
1B
1C
KEY
2 3
4 6A
6B
7 8
9 10
BRAKE METAL PANEL -DARK BRONZE
DARK BRONZE ALUM. WINDOW W/ SUNSHADE WHERE NOTED
DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUM. STOREFRONT
METAL ROLL UP DOOR
PERFORATED METAL PANEL; FENCE / GUARDRAIL
(NOT USED)
LOUVERS -PAINTED TO MATCH WINDOW
5 LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
1B 2
1C
6B3
14'-6"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
6A1A
AVERAGE GRADE
ALONG WEST FACADE
74'-1/4"
TYPE IA
TYPE IIIA
10 5 28
64'-5" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG WEST FACADE
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
1B 1A6A
1C
AVE. GRADE ALONG NORTH ELEVATION
71'-10"
0"
14'-6"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
TYPE I
TYPE IIIA
10 8
8 1B
EXISTING FENCE SHOWN DASHED
66'-7" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG NORTH ELEVATION
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:12:06 PM
A3.02b
05/25/2022
1927400
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLAN NING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"1 NORTH ELEVATION - AT FORECOURT/COURTYARD
1/8" = 1'-0"2 NORTH ELEVATION
<------ --- ---- , --- ------ -- - --- - -- --- --+
-------------------------- --+
--------------------------- ---+
-------------------------- ---+
, ______ , _____ , ___ ------ -- - --- --- --- --+
Q WQ WW Q ~ 4
Q WQ WW QWQ ~ 4
Q WQ WW QWQ ~ 4
g w □ ww : □ w □ ~
........ .......... :· ···-··············-······· ······[D ················-·····•·········•···· -· ····················· ··· ■·1······ ··········-·· .. 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 -MITH UN
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/S l.-..'G
C
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
10' SETBACK
1A
1C
8'-9"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"14'-6"AVE. GRADE ALONG WEST ELEVATION 74'-1/4"
1A
2 6A1B 10 2
8 STAIR PENTHOUSE
54'-6"
5 1B1B
8 64'-5" FROM AVERAGE GRADE ALONG WEST ELEVATION
2 A3.01
1 A3.01
3 A3.03
2 A3.02
1 A3.03
2 A3.03
1 A3.02
STUCCO - WHITE
STUCCO - BLUE
STUCCO - LIGHT GREY
CEMENT BOARD
- DARK GREY
THERMALLY MODIFIED WOOD SIDING;
ALT. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL
NOT USED
MATERIAL LEGEND
1A
1B
1C
KEY
2 3
4 6A
6B
7 8
9 10
BRAKE METAL PANEL -DARK BRONZE
DARK BRONZE ALUM. WINDOW W/ SUNSHADE WHERE NOTED
DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUM. STOREFRONT
METAL ROLL UP DOOR
PERFORATED METAL PANEL; FENCE / GUARDRAIL
(NOT USED)
LOUVERS -PAINTED TO MATCH WINDOW
5 LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"
6A1B 1B 10 1A6A 8
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"10'-0"
40'-0"
21A 6A 1B6A
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
6/27/2022 2:10:55 PM
A3.03b
05/25/2022
1927400
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"1 WEST ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"2 COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-0"3 COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION
z
1::,
:z:
I-
-:=E
~ ~/
¥
T][ ~
~-rlTff'
J t t t i
CICICIC
~-·BJ BJ ED ED
BJ BJ ED ED
t t t " t t
11 ~ I
.-
EIEI EIEI
□□Cl□
-~~~~
0 §lggt)
0 BJ El ED ED, ___
~I lhilifL-L.II ill I
gggtJI ill I
~
~
[
~-lw
; j I I
i i I '
----♦•-··: --: --:-~-,·-·-, •
0000000
0000 0 0
-a::;wn r=;w,
n DJDJDJDJ
~~~~
DJDJDJDJ
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PARKING
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
54'-6"
SBR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
COURTYARD
PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
5' SETBACK
10' SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.
SBR-D
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
_______1
A7.10
JT
3'-0"
JT CLEAR
4'-0"
TREE
4'-0" 6"
STREET PARKING
9'-0"
SIDEWALK
10'-0"
JT CLEAR.
3'-6"
PATIO
7'-2 1/2"
SD
2'-0"
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
54'-6"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
1BR-C
1BR-C
1BR-C
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A3BR-A
3BR-A
3BR-A
3BR-A CORRIDOR
SOUTH
BIKE
RM
LOBBYM SHOP
PROPERTY LINE - SOUTH
EDGE OF CIVIC CENTER DR.
5' SETBACK
10' SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A1BR-C
3BR-DLAUNDRYTRASH
PARKING
STORAGE
STORAGE
STORAGE
STORAGE
CORRIDOR
SOUTH
CORRIDOR
SOUTH
CORRIDOR
SOUTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.
COURTYARD
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:12:56 PM
A3.11
05/25/2022
1927400
BUILDING SECTIONS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"2 SECTION - NORTH / SOUTH
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECTION - NORTH / SOUTH AT LOBBY
-MITH UN
l I I
I
'
1 I ' I I
I
' I
I I I
I
' I '
I ' . - I ··I
' ,J,
I
' ' I '
I I r I .. I
'
~
. I
' ' I '
l I I I I
I __ , ______
l!1 CU,.J:.IJII~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
... I
~ '.!
. I I
I I I
' I
--~--
----- , .....
I
~ ,J, ] ~ D l
- I I
' -
I
' ' r-i I '
I I I I
'
I
'
I
I
I n
-l---i:l-,1.:l-,1.•,-1-,-1-,-1;-,•
r I I ' I
I I
" I, I, 11 I
I
i '
I
I " I
l I
I
I I
I
------ ---------------------------------- ---- -+
····-··-··-········-··-··- ···· +
C
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
3BR-C
3BR-C
3BR-C
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_2
3BR-B_2
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
?
?
?
SBR-A
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
3BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
2BR-B
LOBBY
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
45-DEG
REE
SETBA
CK PLANE
STAIR 2
3BR-C
54'-6"
PROPERTY LINE - WEST
5' SETBACK
OFFICE
CORRIDOR
CORRIDOR
SOUTH
MTG
RM
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A STOR
STOR
STOR
STOR
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
SBR-A
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
45-DEG
REE
SETBA
CK PLANE
PARKING
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
1BR-A
CORRIDOR
NORTH
CORRIDOR
NORTH
CORRIDOR
NORTH
CORRIDOR
NORTH
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
54'-6"
PROPERTY LINE - EAST
EDGE OF LINCOLN ST.
(N) STREET EASEMENT
5' SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
77.90 LEVEL 01
73' - 6"
LEVEL 02
88' - 0"
LEVEL 03
98' - 0"
LEVEL 04
108' - 0"
LEVEL 05
118' - 0"
ROOF
128' - 0"
PARKING
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"
14'-6"
54'-6"
45-DEGREE SETBACK PLANE
PROPERTY LINE - EAST
(N) STREET EASEMENT
5' SETBACK
PROPERTY LINE - NORTH
LAUNDRY
PARKINGPARKING
FIRE
PUMP
COURTYARD
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:13:19 PM
A3.12
05/25/2022
1927400
BUILDING SECTIONS
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/8" = 1'-0"3 SECTION - THROUGH CORRIDOR AT LEVEL 1
1/8" = 1'-0"1 SECTION - THROUGH GARAGE ENTRY
1/8" = 1'-0"2 SECTION - COURTYARD & CONNECTING WALKWAY
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
/ , -,
/ I j l , ,
· I
---------- +-- -
/
n n n n n n n
I
, , I
/ I I ------- f ----------- .- -- -- ----- -+--
MITH UN
, ,
/
n n n n n n f l
I
, , I I
/
I
------- f ___________ ._ - -- - - - - - -- +--
, I /
,
n n n n n n l
I
, 7
I
, I
II
/
n
j ----------t ,
n 7 n n n n
, I
/ 7
I
, , j -- -- - --- --- ~
/ I
---- - ---- -+---
I
I ' ,
~ I I
I
. I I
I
I +--I I l!1 CU,.J:.IJII ~ JIOI/Sl.-..'G
, ,
/ ,
I
,
/ I I , , . ....
/ ' '
I , ,
. /
- - •
I
, , ....
I /
, I
, I . , '
I
/ , , .... I . / I
, I
I
,
/
lFIT
I . , , I '
I / I
- " I
I
, , -
- I
. /
~--
. I
11 l
I
I
I
. -
I i
I
1 , ,
/ , ,
/ I -+; ·"·-- -- - --- .
,, /
n n 7 n n n - n / ~ ---- - --- I , . ,
/
n n n
[7
n n - n , , i / ~ ---- - --- .
, ,
n
I .
/ n 7 n n - n , , I
/
~ ---- - --- -
, ,
n n 7 n n
- n
.
/ I I I , , .,_ ---- - ---
// I . -
V
!,_
n l fl r ri
u I
1 C
REMOVABLE BOLLARD, TYP.
-2' - 4 1/4"
-1' - 8 1/4" -2' - 4 1/4"
12'-3 7/8"
10'-0"
13'-4 3/4" 20'-1 1/8" 6'-4 1/4"
8 3/4"
4'-6"
4'-8"
MECHANICAL UNIT, S.M.D.
12'-10 7/8"
10'-5 5/8"
4'-5 3/8"
TRASH
101
3 C.Y. BINS, NIC.
SHOWN FOR REFERENCE
7'-9 1/8"
PERFORATED METAL PANEL SCREEN
MOUNTED ON 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB
17'-4 5/8"
39'-10 1/8"
TRASH
STAGING
AREA
FOR TRASH COLLECTION
MANEUVER, REFER TO /
2 A1.01
12 P
12 P16B
P
20 P
50A
P
20 P
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 2:13:22 PM
A8.50
05/25/2022
1927400
ENLARGED PLANS
-TRASH ROOM AND
CHUTES
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AT
KB / SA
SA / AK
AP
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.09.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.25.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/4" = 1'-0"1 TRASH ROOM - GROUND LEVEL
1/4" = 1'-0"10 TYPICAL TRASH CHUTE ROOM
MITH UN
:@
l."' "CHAll11fS IIOOSl"'-'G
C
D
D
CR
J
V
P
B
2 a
F1
DZP
PC
P
a
D
a
a
S
G
W
PLC
TV
M
T
G
GFP
SPD
EPO
CB
AV
L
N E
AV
GROUND ROD
GROUND BUS BAR
CABLE TAP BOX
MOTOR CONNECTION
J-HOOK PATHWAY
PANELBOARD RECESSED MOUNTED
BUSWAY HORIZONTAL
SWITCH AND FUSE
CIRCUIT BREAKER
CIRCUIT BREAKER IN ENCLOSURE
DRAWOUT TYPE CIRCUIT BREAKER
ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT
PANELBOARD SURFACE MOUNTED
BUSWAY RISER WITH PLUG IN UNIT
STEP DOWN TRANSFORMER
GENERATOR
AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH
HEAVY DUTY DISCONNECT SWITCH
HEAVY DUTY DISCONNECT SWITCH WITH FUSE
MOTOR STARTER
COMBINATION MOTOR STARTER/DISCONNECT SWITCH
THERMAL OVERLOAD/DISCONNECT SWITCH
DRAWOUT TYPE SWITCH AND FUSE
CURRENT TRANSFORMER AND KWH METER
GROUND FAULT PROTECTION RELAY
NORMALLY OPEN CONTACT
NORMALLY CLOSED CONTACT
TRANSFORMER
ABBREVIATIONS
JUNCTION BOX, WALL / CEILING MOUNTED
SURGE PROTECTIVE DEVICE
RED PUSH BUTTON MUSHROOM TYPE WITH CLEAR LEXAN PROTECTIVE SHROUD COVER.
EPO = EMERGENCY POWER OFF
ACCESS CONTROL CARD READER BACK BOX
VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE
M
INDICATES CIRCUITING
LIGHTING FIXTURE(S), POLE MOUNTED
WALL WASHER, CEILING MOUNTED
EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE
LIGHTING FIXTURE, WALL MOUNTED
LIGHTING FIXTURE DOWNLIGHT, CEILING MOUNTED
INDICATES SWITCH CONTROL
LIGHTING LEGEND
LIGHTING FIXTURE TYPE
FIXTURE DESIGNATION:
DZP = DAYLIGHTING ZONE PRIMARY
DZS = DAYLIGHTING ZONE SECONDARY
SZ = DAYLIGHTING ZONE SKYLIGHT
DAYLIGHTING PHOTOCELL. SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES LIGHTING CONTROLLED.
OCCUPANCY SENSOR, CEILING MOUNTED.
SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES FIXTURE(S) CONTROLLED.
H - INDICATES HALLWAY TYPE SENSOR.
OUTDOOR PHOTOCELL SENSOR
DATA AND AV DEVICE LEGEND
C
W
TELEPHONE/DATA OUTLET, MOUNT AT 18" AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON, PROVIDE DOUBLE-GANG BOX WITH 1''C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE. PROVIDE PULL CORD.
COMBINATION DIMMER & OCCUPANCY SENSOR, WALL MOUNTED
POWER AND SIGNAL DEVICE LEGEND
THREE WAY SWITCH
POWER LEGEND
OVERRIDE CONTROL SWITCH. PROVIDE LABEL INDICATING "OVERRIDE LTG/REC CONTROL".
T = TAMPER RESISTANT TYPE OUTLET
C
IG
D
= ABOVE COUNTER
ISOLATED GROUND
DEDICATED CIRCUIT
=
=
=
=
a
6 WP WEATHERPROOF=
# SPECIAL MOUNTING HEIGHT=
CEILING MOUNTED DUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A
CEILING MOUNTED QUADRUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A DIMMER SYSTEM LIGHT CONTROL - 3 WAY
DIMMER SYSTEM LIGHT CONTROL
KEYED TYPE SWITCH
G
HALF-CONTROLLED QUADRUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, (ONE DUPLEX CONTROLLED, ONE DUPLEX UNCONTROLLED). MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, UON FLOOR MOUNTED POWER OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V, 20A FLOOR MOUNTED POWER QUADRUPLEX OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V, 20A
COMBINATION POWER, TELE/DATA & AUDIO VISUAL FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED HALF CONTROLLED QUADRUPLEX OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V. 20A
COMBINATION POWER, TELE/DATA & AUDIO VISUAL FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED SPLIT WIRED DUPLEX OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V. 20A QUADRIPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON
DUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP.
UON
CONTROL SWITCH, SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES ASSOCIATED LIGHT FIXTURE(S) / EQUIPMENT CONTROLLED. NO SUBSCRIPT INDICATES ALL LIGHT FIXTURE(S) / EQUIPMENT CONTROLLED INSIDE ROOM. MOUNT AT +42" AFF, TYP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. = GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER
RECEPTACLE SUBSCRIPT LEGEND
BELL
PUSHBUTTON
ADA DOOR PUSHPAD
SINGLEPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON
COMBINATION 120V/USB DUPLEX RECEPTACLE
CONTROLLED DUPLEX RECEPTACLE OUTLET: 125V, 20A, TOP HALF SWITCHED VIA OCCUPANCY SENSOR OR VIA TIME SWITCH IN OPEN OFFICES. (PLUG LOAD CONTROL) MOUNT AT 18"AFF TO
CENTER OF OUTLET, UON
FLUSH FLOOR MOUNTED POWER OUTLET. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND TYPE. 125V, 20A SPECIAL PURPOSE RECEPTACLE OUTLET: RATING AS INDICATED
POWER/TELECOM WIREMOLD SURFACE RACEWAY, LENGTH APPROXIMATELY AS SHOWN a
K
3 OV
3 a
SUBSC
RIPT(S) INDICATES SWITCH CONTROL
NUMBER INDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER
LIGHTING FIXTURE LINEAR, LENGTH AS SHOWN, CEILING MOUNTED
LIGHTING FIXTURE, LENGTH AS SHOWN, WALL MOUNTED
EMEM
OR
DATA OUTLET AT CEILING, PROVIDE SINGLE-GANG BOX/SINGLE GANG MUD RING/STRING WITH 1" C
DATA OUTLET, MOUNT AT 18" AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, TYP. UON, PROVIDE DOUBLE-GANG BOX/SINGLE EXTENDED GANG MUDRING/STRINGS WITH 1"C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE.
TELEPHONE OUTLET, "W" INDICATES WALL PHONE, MOUNT AT 45" AFF TO TOP OF OUTLET, UON, PROVIDE SINGLE-GANG BOX/SINGLE-GANG MUD-RING/STRING WITH 1"C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE.
TELEVISION OUTLET, MOUNT AT 18" AFF TO CENTER OF OUTLET, PROVIDE SINGLE-GANG BOX WITH 1"C TO ABOVE ACCESSIBLE CEILING SPACE.
EXIT SIGN, WALL MOUNTED
SHADING = ILLUMINATED
FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN
EXIT SIGN, LOW LEVEL, RECESSED IN WALL
SHADING = ILLUMINATED FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN
OCCUPANCY SENSOR, WALL MOUNTED. DUAL OR SINGLE RELAY PER PLANS.
SUBSCRIPT(S) INDICATES FIXTURE(S) CONTROLLED.
EXIT SIGN, CEILING MOUNTED
P = PENDANT MOUNTED
SHADING = ILLUMINATED FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN
EXIT SIGN, CEILING MOUNTED
P = PENDANT MOUNTED
SHADING = ILLUMINATED FACE ARROWS AS SHOWN
CONTROL PANEL SURFACE MOUNTED EXAMPLES: LCP, SECURITY, BMS CONTROL PANEL RECESSED MOUNTED EXAMPLES: LCP, SECURITY, BMS MS = MOTORIZED SHADE CONTROLLER (FBO)
PS = PROJECTION SCREEN CONTROLLER (FBO)xx
T
J
INTEG
RATED LUMINAIRE OCCUPANCY SENSOR AND CONTROL UNIT FOR WIRELESS LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM. HB = HIGH BAY TYPE.
GATEWAY CONTROLLER FOR WIRELESS CONNECTIVITY.
PLUG LOAD CONTROLLER FOR POWER RECEPTACLES.
ABOVE COUNTER
ANNUNCIATOR
AMMETER
AMPERE
ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR
APPROXIMATELY
ARCHITECTURAL
AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH
AUTOMATIC
BUILDING
CLOCK OR CONDUIT
CABINET
CAPACITOR
CATALOG
CIRCUIT BREAKER
CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION
CURRENT LIMITING FUSE
CEILING
CIRCUIT
COMBINATION
CONCRETE
CONNECTION
CONTACTOR
CONTRACTOR
CURRENT TRANSFORMER
DECIBEL
DIRECT CURRENT
DETAIL
DIAMETER
DIAGRAM
DIMENSION
DISCONNECT
DISTRIBUTION
DIVISION
DAMPER MOTOR
DOWN
DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROW
DOUBLE POLE SINGLE THROW
DRAWING
EACH
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR
ELECTRICAL
ELEVATION
EMERGENCY
ENCLOSURE
EQUIPMENT
ELECTRIC WATER COOLER
ELECTRIC WATER HEATER
EXISTING
EXPOSED
FIRE ALARM
FOOTCANDLE
FIXTURE
FIGURE
FLOOR
FULL LOAD AMPERE
FLEXIBLE
FLUORESCENT
FOOT OR FEET
FUTURE
GENERATOR
GROUND FAULT
HEIGHT
HIGH INTENSITY DISCHARGE
HORIZONTAL
HORSEPOWER
HEATER
HEATING, VENTILATION
HIGH VOLTAGE
HERTZ
IMPEDANCE
INCH OR INCHES
JUNCTION BOX
KILOVOLT
KILOVOLT - AMPERE
KILOWATT
LIGHTING
MAXIMUM
MOTOR CONTROL CENTER
MOTOR CIRCUIT PROTECTOR
MECHANICAL
MOUNTED
NEUTRAL
NORMALLY CLOSED
NUMBER
NORMALLY OPEN
NOMINAL
NAMEPLATE
NOT TO SCALE
+6" OVERCOUNTER OR BACKSPLASH
OUTSIDE DIAMETER
OVERLOAD
POLE
PUBLIC ADDRESS
PULL BOX or PUSHBUTTON
POWER FACTOR
PHASE
PILOT LIGHT
PANEL
PAIR
PRIMARY
POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
RECESSED or RECEPTACLE
REFERENCE
REGULATOR
REQUIRED
REVISION
ROOM
SCHEDULE
SMOKE DETECTOR
SECONDARY or SECURITY
SOLID NEUTRAL
SOLENOID
SPARE
SPACE
SINGLE POLE DOUBLE THROW
SINGLE POLE SINGLE THROW
SPECIFICATION
SUPERVISORY
SQUARE FOOT
STATION
STANDARD
SUSPENDED
SWITCH
SWITCHBOARD
SWITCHGEAR
SYNCHRONIZATION
SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
TEMPERATURE
THERMAL OVERLOAD
TWISTED PAIR SHIELDED
EXPLOSION PROOF
TELEPHONE TERMINAL CABINET
TELEVISION
TYPICAL
UNIT HEATER
UNIT VENTILATOR
VOLT
VOLT AMPERE
VERTICAL
VESTIBULE
VOLTMETER
VOLUME
WATT
WEATHER PROOF
AC
ANN
AM
A OR AMP
AFF
APPROX
ARCH
ATS
AUTO
BLDG
C
CAB
CAP
CAT
CB
CCTV
CLF
CLG
CKT
COMB
CONC
CONN
CONT
CONTR
CT
DB
DC
DET
DIA
DIAG
DIM
DISC
DIST
DIV
DM
DN
DPDT
DPST
DWG
EA
EC
ELECT
EL
EM
ENCL
EQUIP
EWC
EWH
(E)
EXP
FA
FC
FIXT
FIG
FL
FLA
FLEX
FLUOR
FT
FUT
GEN
GFI
HGT
HID
HORIZ
HP
HTR
HVAC
HV
HZ
IMP
IN
JB
KV
KVA
KW
LTG
MAX
MCC
MCP
MECH
MTD
NEUT
NC
No
NO
NOM
NP
NTS
OC
OD
OL
P
PA
PB
PF
PH
PL
PNL
PR
PRI
PVC
REC
REF
REG
REQD
REV
RM
SCHED
SD
SEC
SN
SOL
SP
SPC
SPDT
SPST
SPEC
SUPV
SQ.FT.
STA
STD
SUSP
SW
SWBD
SWGR
SYNC
SYST
T or TEL
TEMP
TOL
TPS
XP
TTC
TV
(TYP.)
UH
UV
V
VA
VERT
VEST
VM
VOL
W
WP
AUXILIARY
AUDIO VISUAL
AUX
AV
AND AIR CONDITIONING
MOUNTINGMTG
NOT IN CONTRACTNIC
VERMIN RESISTANTVR
CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER
REMOVE AND REINSTALLRR
TRANSFORMERXFMR
ARC FAULT CURRENT INTERUPTAFCI
AMPERES INTERRUPTING CAPACITYAIC
DAYLIGHTING ZONE PRIMARYDZP
DAYLIGHTING ZONE SECONDARYDZS
DAYLIGHTING ZONE SKYLIGHTSZ
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001
G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:32:54 PM
E0.01
05/25/2022
1927400
LEGEND, SYMBOLS,
GENERAL NOTES &
DRAWING LIST
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
-MITHUN
p 0 []
@ 2
~
9 = y
=
~
~ (::.ill
jt n =
~
1 ~
---
~
"
o--() 0-0--0
.....3 .
~
. =-
~
..., -=O
"""
----
□ 0
'
D' • i '
IZI'
i == IZI +-$
'
ID'
$ -BIi
$ -BIi D'
$
-
Q
I ~ □ I
□
0 $
0 El l:l) 0 I
0 i:::::,
□
IY
oo
@
~ -■■-
~ TT
:I' ®
:I' _,....._~
I;! -"--rr=,..-
-<<-~-»-
-<<~>-
□
8)
--0
= -----, I--
-----#-
~
~ I
Luminaire Schedule
Scene: Site
Qty Tag Label Lum. Lumens LLF Lum. Watts
6 ZW1 24370_BEGA_IES 421 10
16 ZR1B 24817_BEGA_IES 1239 0.850 10
4 ZS1 svpg-266l-1200-nw-g2-5 7038 51.9
5 ZY1 LN450-2LVC-WW-T3 5126 71.99
2 ZR1A 24823_BEGA_IES 1218 10
10 ZS2 LN950___Std-Output-3000K 568 0.850 16
7 ZR2 24212K3_BEGA_IES 1423 0.850 15
8 ZW2 24351K3_BEGA_IES 3250 0.850 26
0.850
0.850
0.850
0.850
Calculation Summary
Scene: Site
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
Garage Entrance Illuminance Fc 7.08 10.9 2.5 2.83 4.36
Main Entry Illuminance Fc 5.98 278.5 0.3 19.93 928.33
Parking Illuminance Fc 2.34 12.4 0.4 5.85 31.00
Pathway 1 Illuminance Fc 3.94 10.4 0.3 13.13 34.67
Pathway 2 Illuminance Fc 12.98 165.7 0.1 129.80 1657
Pathway 3 Illuminance Fc 24.00 29.2 18.7 1.28 1.56
Pathway 4 Illuminance Fc 7.95 27.6 2.5 3.18 11.04
Pathway 5 Illuminance Fc 2.01 5.9 0.1 20.10 59.00
Pathway 6 Illuminance Fc 3.63 4.5 3.0 1.21 1.50
Trash Shed Illuminance Fc 13.17 34.6 3.7 3.56 9.35
8.1 8.2 8.6 8.8 8.8 8.7
8.3 8.6 9.2 9.6 9.7 9.4 10.0 10.9 9.4 8.0 6.9
8.4 8.8 9.5 9.9 10.0 10.0 9.9 9.9 9.5 8.9 7.9 6.9 7.5 7.0
8.6 9.1 9.7 10.0 10.1 10.4 10.3 10.2 10.0 9.4 8.3 6.9 6.0 5.1 3.9 3.3 2.6
8.6 9.0 9.5 9.9 10.1 10.5 10.5 10.4 10.0 9.2 8.2 6.9 5.6 4.8 4.2 3.7 3.0
8.5 9.0 9.4 9.7 9.9 10.2 10.3 10.2 9.6 8.8 7.8 6.7 5.8 4.9 4.2 3.6
8.5 8.9 9.3 9.5 9.6 9.9 9.9 9.7 9.1 8.2 7.2 6.2 5.4 4.6 3.9 3.3
8.4 8.7 9.1 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.2 8.5 7.6 6.6 5.6 4.9 4.1 3.4 2.8
8.4 8.8 9.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.0 8.7 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.2 4.4 3.7 3.0
8.4 8.7 9.0 9.0 8.9 8.8 8.6 8.2 7.5 6.6 5.7 4.8 4.0 3.4 2.7
8.2 8.4 8.7 8.8 8.6 8.5 8.2 7.8 7.1 6.2 5.3 4.4 3.7 3.1 2.5
8.6 8.8 8.9 8.8 8.4 8.0 7.7 7.3 6.5 5.7 4.9 4.1 3.5 2.9
7.3 6.8 6.2 5.4 4.6 3.9 3.3 2.7
5.9 5.2 4.4 3.8 3.2
5.7 5.1 4.3 3.7 3.1
6.0 5.5 4.9 4.3 3.7 3.1
5.5 4.9 4.4 4.0 3.7
4.7 4.3 3.9 3.5 3.4
4.2 5.1 4.7 3.3
3.1 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4
0.5 0.6 0.4
0.3 0.3 0.6
0.3 0.6 0.6
0.3 0.6 0.5 0.6
0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6
0.6 0.4 0.4 0.5
0.4 0.5 0.6
0.3 0.4 0.6
5.7 6.7 6.7 6.6 6.7 6.7 5.6
8.0 9.3 9.5 9.7 9.5 9.3 8.0
8.7 10.0 10.4 10.6 10.6 9.9 8.6
7.4 8.8 8.8 9.2 9.1 9.6 8.6 4.8 18.4 25.0 14.2 5.5 14.1 24.9 19.2 6.0 6.0 19.2 24.6 13.0 2.8 1.3 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7
4.9 5.8 5.9 5.7 6.4 7.0 6.7 9.2 25.6 30.5 19.3 6.8 19.1 31.0 25.3 8.1 8.2 25.4 30.4 17.7 3.5 1.4 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.8
2.3 2.9 3.0 3.2 3.9 4.9 5.5 4.9 13.8 19.0 10.3 4.5 10.0 18.6 13.8 4.9 4.9 13.9 18.3 1.4 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.1
1.3 1.6 1.8 2.2 3.1 6.1 12.3 3.0 3.3 4.0 3.2 2.7 3.1 4.0 3.3 2.6 2.6 3.3 3.8 2.5 1.6 1.2 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.2
0.8 1.0 1.3 1.8 3.2 9.5 41.8 96.6 1.6 1.6 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.5 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.5
0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 2.8 9.0 34.9 6.6 0.9 1.1 3.8 2.2 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.8
0.8 1.2 1.6 2.1 2.0 278.5 39.1 8.9 2.6 1.3 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.7 4.2
0.7 0.9 1.5 2.5 3.4 46.1 28.9 7.0 2.4 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.4 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.9
0.8 1.1 2.1 5.3 14.3 2.9 1.5 7.3 3.5 1.7 0.9 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.1 2.7 2.2
0.8 1.4 2.9 9.7 46.6 219.8 1.9 1.5 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.3 1.9 2.4 2.9 3.1 2.8
0.8 1.3 2.7 8.2 24.4 2.1 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.4 1.9 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.3
1.3 2.2 2.6 2.2 2.3 1.9 1.8 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.8 1.9 2.1 2.7 2.6
2.0 2.8 3.1 3.0 2.5 2.1 3.1 3.5 2.1 0.8 1.1 1.5 1.8 1.7 2.1 4.1
10.0 9.7 4.7 3.1 2.4 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.6 2.4 1.4 1.8 1.7 1.7 2.7
26.8 25.7 10.1 3.6 2.7 2.3 2.4 2.7 3.1 3.0 2.4 2.7 1.7 1.4
28.3 27.2 10.8 3.5 2.7 2.7 3.0 2.9 2.4 2.3 3.0 2.7 2.2
13.3 12.6 5.3 2.9 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.1 2.3 2.7 3.1 2.7
4.3 4.3 3.3 2.6 2.0 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.2 2.9 2.4 3.4 4.7
9.5 9.0 4.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 2.7 2.3 2.2 2.3 1.8 1.5
9.1 2.5 2.3 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5
1.8 1.8 1.7 1.4
1.3 0.6 0.6
0.4 0.6 0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
0.6 0.6
5.9 4.3 2.2 1.8 1.4
5.0 3.8 2.3 2.1 2.0
3.7 3.0 2.4 2.4 2.9
2.7 2.3 2.2 2.6 3.3
2.0 1.8 2.0 2.6 3.2
1.6 1.5 1.7 2.4 3.3
5.2 5.0 3.0 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.5 2.2 3.4
3.9 3.9 2.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.2 3.3
2.6 2.9 2.4 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.2 3.2
2.0 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 2.3 3.6
1.8 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.1 1.3 2.2 3.9 6.8 9.7 12.0
1.2 1.0 1.2 2.0 3.1 4.1 3.8 5.7
3.0 3.0 2.3 1.6 1.1 0.9 1.2 1.9 2.8 3.2 2.7 3.4
4.5 4.0 2.5 1.6 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.8 2.8 3.9 3.5 4.9
5.7 4.8 2.6 1.5 1.0 0.7 1.0 1.8 3.2 6.2 9.3 12.4
5.2 4.5 2.5 1.5 0.9 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.8 4.7 5.5 7.8 3.8 1.4
3.8 3.5 2.3 1.4 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.7 2.3 3.0 1.4
0.9 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.7 0.8
1.5 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.3 2.0 2.4
1.0 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.5 3.9 4.2 5.6
0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.9 5.6 8.6 11.1
0.7 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.3 3.2
1.0 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.8
1.0 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.9
2.5 3.0 2.3 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.7 1.1 1.4 1.6 1.3 1.4
3.9 4.2 2.9 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.9 2.7 2.5 3.3
5.0 5.2 3.2 1.5 1.1 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.7 4.9 7.0 9.1
4.6 4.8 3.1 1.5 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.7 2.8 4.7 5.9 7.5
3.2 3.7 2.7 1.6 0.8 1.1 1.7 2.5 5.1
1.1 0.9 1.1 1.8 2.5
1.3 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.1 1.8 3.0 4.2 4.1 6.0
0.9 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.1 1.8 3.4 6.2 9.3 11.7
0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.9 1.5 2.5 3.6 3.6 5.5
0.7 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.8 1.1 1.6 1.8 2.1
1.1 1.4 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9
1.0 0.7 0.7
2.6 3.1 2.4 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.9
4.0 4.3 2.9 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.8 2.3 2.0 2.9
5.0 5.3 3.2 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.6 2.9 4.6 5.3 7.7
4.5 4.7 3.0 1.5 1.0 0.7 0.9 1.7 3.3 5.9 8.4 10.8
3.1 3.5 2.6 1.5 1.0 0.8 1.4 2.2 3.0 2.7 4.3
0.9 0.3
0.4 0.5 0.6
1.0 0.9 0.8
1.3 1.2 1.2
1.6 1.7 1.6
2.0 2.1 2.2
2.5 2.7 2.9
3.0 3.5 3.8
3.7 4.4 5.0
4.2 5.2 6.2
4.4 5.4 6.5
4.2 5.0 5.7
4.0 4.5 4.8
3.9 4.3 4.5
3.9 4.3 4.4
3.9 4.3 4.5
4.1 4.6 5.0
4.4 5.1 5.9
4.6 5.6 6.7
4.5 5.5 6.6
4.2 7.1 8.1 7.5 3.3 2.6
3.9 4.3 4.6 5.1 5.8 5.0 1.9 5.6
3.8 4.0 4.1 3.9 3.7 3.8 4.5 3.3 1.0 1.1 9.7
3.8 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.6 3.9 4.5 3.9 2.3 0.7 0.9 10.4
4.0 4.2 4.0 3.8 3.7 4.2 5.0 3.8 1.9 6.5
0.2 0.1
0.4 0.1
0.3 0.2
23.8 24.8 6.9 0.9 0.7 1.2 2.2 3.5 1.0 0.8 1.5 4.3 9.2 9.2 4.3 1.2
98.1 112.2 0.8 1.2 2.1 4.8 15.9 30.1 0.7 0.8 29.1 10.4 3.2 1.6 1.1 0.9 5.6 38.4 40.7 5.8
1.3 1.8 2.8 6.1 26.3 165.7 21.2 71.5 14.0 4.2 2.3 1.8 1.5 1.3 23.4 41.1
1.9 3.4 4.5 5.8 12.5 6.1 3.1 3.5 2.5 2.2 2.2 2.9 15.0 9.2 4.4 3.1 3.2 3.6 2.4 1.4
4.3 14.3 17.3 9.1 4.8 5.1 14.5 17.3 8.1 3.3 4.5 13.0 17.3 10.5 4.3 4.6 12.6 17.6 9.3 2.4 1.2
8.5 29.7 15.9 4.6 9.9 27.5 30.5 16.6 4.7 8.0 24.9 30.0 17.8 4.9 7.1 23.9 30.4 19.0 3.8 1.3
8.3 23.2 26.6 13.3 4.6 6.3 19.5 24.5 13.4 4.0
6.5 17.5 21.1 9.7 4.1
9.5 27.1 30.5 16.1 3.6
7.4 23.1 26.6 12.8 2.9
29.2 20.1
28.0 18.7
22.0 23.8 6.9
10.8 3.8
3.9 2.8
8.0 3.4
21.9 6.1
24.0 7.0
11.1 4.0
4.1 3.1
6.6 3.6
20.4 6.0
25.6 8.1
14.6 5.6
5.9 4.8
8.3 5.7
22.4 8.4 5.3
27.6 10.4 5.5 4.6 4.3 4.0
5.5 6.5 5.3 4.5 4.9
6.0 4.8 5.0 4.8 4.1
4.3 4.3 4.6 4.7 3.4 2.8
7.1 4.0 2.7 2.7
0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
2.6 4.6 5.9 4.2 2.6 2.3 3.6 5.6 5.2 3.0 1.3
3.4 3.0 4.5
13.7 15.6 11.0 8.6 8.0 7.3
28.6 32.6 19.3 9.1 7.7 7.1 6.5
30.8 34.6 20.9 9.0 7.5 6.8
17.0 19.9 12.1 7.8 7.0 6.4
8.1 8.7 7.6 6.9 6.3 5.7
11.4 13.1 8.5 6.0 5.1
25.4 29.3 16.0 5.7 4.2
27.5 31.3 17.3 5.2
13.2 16.0 8.1 3.7
PATHWAY 1
PATHWAY 2
PATHWAY 4
PATHWAY 5
PATHWAY 3
MAIN ENTRY
GARAGE ENTRANCE
TRASH SHED
CIVIC CENTER DR.
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
PROJECT NORTH
CIVIC CENTER DR.
LINCOLN ST.
5 STORY APARTMENTS
5 STORY APARTMENTS
SETBACK
LEVEL-2
COURTYARD
(E) TRANSFORMER
(N) TRANSFORMER
S.J.T.D, S.E.D.
(E) WOOD FENCE
O/ 2-3' RETAINING WALL
(E) FENCE
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR
PARKING ACCESS
ELEVATOR
PENTHOUSE
PRIMARY ENTRY
FOURCOURT
1651 TRITON CT
1661 TRITON CT
1671 TRITON CT
1681 TRITON CT
1691 TRITON CT
1700 LINCOLN ST
1701 TRITON CT
(N) LANDSCAPE WALL,
S.L.D.
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE
E E
T
G
FH
(N) SIDEWALK
(N) STREET
EASEMENT
(E) R.O.W.
(N) WATER AND FIRE ,
SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
STAIR ACCESS
TO ROOF
(N) IRRIGATION
SERVICE WITH
BACKFLOW
PREVENTER, S.C.D.
STAIR ACCESS
TO ROOF
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR GARAGE
PARKING ACCESS, S.C.D.
(N) DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND
PULL SERVICES
SEE NOTES BELOW FOR TRASH SERVICES.
FH
FH TRASH STAGING AREA
(N) NEW FENCE AND GATE, S.L.D.
LINCOLN ST.
CIVIC CENTER DR.
ZR1A
ZR1B
ZR2
ZR2
ZS2
ZS2
ZS2
ZS2
ZY1
ZY1
ZY1
ZY1
ZY1
ZW2
ZW2
ZW1
ZW2
ZW2
ZW2
ZW2
ZR1B
ZW2
ZW1
ZW2
ZW1ZW1
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1BZR1B ZR1B ZR1B
ZR2ZR2 ZR2
ZR1B
ZR1A
ZR1BZR1B
ZS2
ZS2
ZR1B
ZS2
ZS2
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZS1
ZS1
ZS1
ZS1
ZR1B
ZR1B
ZR2ZR2
ZS2
ZS2
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001
G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:04 PM
E1.01
05/25/2022
1927400
SITE PLAN - LIGHTING
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/16" = 1'-0"1 SITE PLAN - LIGHTING
1 GENERAL NOTES:SHEET NOTES:
1. +++++
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
r
I
L
~
0 MITHUN
0 ~
Calculation Summary
Scene: Podium
Label CalcType Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min
Podium Walkway Illuminance Fc 12.84 120.6 0.1 128.40 1206 Path of Travel Illuminance Fc 17.00 120.6 1.0 17.00 120.60 Luminaire Schedule
Scene: Podium
Qty Tag Label Lum. Lumens LLF Lum. Watts
3 ZR1B 24817_BEGA_IES 1239 0.850 10
5 ZW3 24502_BEGA_IES 1217 0.850 17
23 ZR2 24212K3_BEGA_IES 1423 0.850 15
0.2 0.2
0.5 0.5 0.1
0.1 0.2 0.6 0.2
0.2 0.2
17.2 3.4 89.3 2.9 2.7 31.9 12.5
9.9 87.3 1.8 5.1 1.5 1.7 4.5
3.4 9.0 10.0 43.9 1.5 68.8 26.0 6.4 31.0 2.9 1.0
42.0 6.2 4.5 6.3 10.5 23.1 10.9 120.6 2.9 54.8 48.8 2.5 4.5 56.4 10.4 15.8 8.1 6.2 6.5 1.8 2.1 1.4
8.1 4.6 2.1 1.8 2.2 3.3 4.6 11.8 8.9 55.8 1.5 3.5 1.7 2.0 3.5 2.0 10.4 15.6 18.1 5.6 6.6 16.7 7.5 8.2 2.1 2.6 13.1 7.3
42.2 1.5 1.0 2.6 3.7 1.4 2.0 35.7 1.1 82.2 9.6 27.5 6.0 3.6 5.2 3.1 12.7 25.1 2.3 6.8 28.6 9.3 58.4 2.8 1.2 23.6 10.9
7.0 1.3 0.7 3.3 2.7 5.4 4.4 3.5 3.2 4.7 21.5 1.0
39.7 4.3 1.2 1.3 2.0 7.6 8.9 3.3
8.2 3.8 1.1 6.9
37.4 4.3
9.4 3.8
35.2 4.2 1.0
0.7 PATH OF TRAVEL
PROJECT NORTH
A
224
SBR-A
212
3BR-B_3
207
2BR-B
205
3BR-B
201
2BR-B
203
SBR-A
209
SBR-A
211
3BR-B_2
220
2BR-B
226
2BR-B
214
1BR-A
219
3BR-A
216
1BR-A
218
1BR-A
206
3BR-B
202
2BR-B
208
SBR-A
STAIR 2
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 96.45.3 5.5
ELEC.
CLOSET
ELECTRICAL
CLOSET
200D
222
2BR-B
204
SBR-A
221
3BR-B
223
1BR-A
STAIR 1
213
3BR-C
CL.
225
SBR-A
210
1BR-C
215
1BR-B
217
1BR-B
CTYD
COURTYARD
C2A
CORRIDOR SOUTH
C2B
CORRIDOR NORTH
STORAGE
200B
TRASH
200E
STOR
200A
ELEC.
CLOSET
JANITOR
ZR1B
ZR1B ZW3
ZW3
ZR1B
ZW3 ZW3
ZW3
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2 ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
ZR2
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001
G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:23 PM
E1.02
05/25/2022
1927400
PODIIUM LEVEL FLOOR
PLAN - LIGHTING
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUS
ING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.0 8.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1/16" = 1'-0"1 PODIUM LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - LIGHTING
1 GENERAL NOTES:SHEET NOTES:
1. +++++
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
----------------------- -- ----- MITHUN
0 \
\
\
\
\_
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I
~
EV
EV
VAN
NO
PARKING
EV
CIVIC CENTER DR.
LINCOLN ST.
5 STORY APARTMENTS
5 STORY APARTMENTS
SETBACK
LEVEL-2
COURTYARD
(E) TRANSFORMER
(N) TRANSFORMER
S.J.T.D, S.E.D.
(E) WOOD FENCE
O/ 2-3' RETAINING WALL
(E) FENCE
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR
PARKING ACCESS
ELEVATOR
PENTHOUSE
PRIMARY ENTRY
FOURCOURT
1651 TRITON CT
1661 TRITON CT
1671 TRITON CT
1681 TRITON CT
1691 TRITON CT
1700 LINCOLN ST
1701 TRITON CT
(N) LANDSCAPE WALL,
S.L.D.
(E) CHAIN LINK FENCE
E E
T
G
FH
(N) SIDEWALK
(N) STREET
EASEMENT
(E) R.O.W.
(N) WATER AND FIRE ,
SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS
STAIR ACCESS
TO ROOF
(N) IRRIGATION
SERVICE WITH
BACKFLOW
PREVENTER, S.C.D.
STAIR ACCESS
TO ROOF
(N) DRIVEWAY FOR GARAGE
PARKING ACCESS, S.C.D.
(N) DEDICATED PATH FOR TRASH PUSH AND
PULL SERVICES
SEE NOTES BELOW FOR TRASH SERVICES.
FH
FH TRASH STAGING AREA
(N) NEW FENCE AND GATE, S.L.D.
1 2 3 4 5 5.35.5 6 6.4 7 8 9
I
H
G
F
C
B
A
LINCOLN ST.
CIVIC CENTER DR.
(PROPOSED)
UNDERGROUND
UTILITY SVC.
MAIN SVC. SWITCHGEAR
(GROUND FLOOR)
(NEW) UTILITY
TRANSFORMER.
PAD AND
INSTALLATION IN
ACCORDANCE
WITH SVP
REQUIREMENTS.
TO SVP POINT
OF CONNECTION
TO BE
DETERMINED.
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001
G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:37 PM
E1.03
05/25/2022
1927400
SITE PLAN - POWER
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUS
ING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1" = 20'-0"1 SITE PLAN - POWER
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
I
'.y f
\:'~-
MITHUN
~
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI GFCI
GFCI
GFCI GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI GFCI GFCI
GFCI
GFCI GFCI GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
GFCI
J
J
J
J
GFCI
J
J
J
J
PROJECT NORTH
A
B
C
F
G
H
I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 96.45.3 5.5
FIRE PUMP
(75 HP)
2BR-A
112
COMMUNITY RM
105
LOBBY
L1
PARKING
P1
FIRE PUMP
118
STAIR 2
ST2.1
AP AP
E4.02
5 FIRE PUMP
SWITCHBRD
SECTION
TRASH
101
STORAGE
102A
DWH
117
ELEC RM
116
MPOE /TEL
115
2BR-A
114
SBR-D
113
STAIR 1
ST1.1
CORRIDOR
SOUTH
C1A
3BR-D
111
OFFICE
106A
TENANT
SERVICES
106C
SERVER & COPY
106B
PANTRY
105B
STOR.
105A
LAUNDRY
104
BIKE RM
103
E4.01
6 E4.05
4 ELEV. CTRL.
107JAN.
108
EERC
110
RR
109
ELEVATOR 2
E2
ELEVATOR 1
E1
STOR.
L1A
STORAGE
119
HEAT RM
120
MSB-1 APARTMENT
METERING
EQUIP. TYPICAL.
E7.01
1 VRFFC
2 FC
EERC
HP
ELEV
HP
EERC
?
?
HP
LAUNDRY
FC
LAUNDRY
EF
BIKE
P1H1
MTG RM
106D
14-30R
14-30R
EV CHARGING
EV CHARGING
EV CHARGING
EV CHARGING
1-1/2" C. TO
EACH EV
CHARGING
STATION.
TYPICAL.
WP
HP
FP
FC
ELEC-1
FC
ELEC-2
FC
MPOE
HP
MSHOP
DWH
FC
ELEV
WP
GFCI
ELEC BIKE CHARGERS
LCP
LTG. INVERTER
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001
G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:33:53 PM
E3.01
05/25/2022
1927400
LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN -
GROUND - POWER
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUS
ING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1. +++++
1/8" = 1'-0"1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN - GROUND - POWER
1 GENERAL NOTES:
SHEET NOTES:
1. +++++
-MITHUN
1 0
d
-Cl- ~ -- - 0-
□ □
jT
\ j':~
., I i
I C:::J
\ I n---- ~ -J ---A
□
□
[
□
! ~
□ □
~
.L
- - /
- ElllE:l'll';'I- - - - - -. - - --'-----------' / /
~
T
N N
G G G
M
LOAD
800A
3P
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
800A
3P
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
1 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
N.T.S.
LSIG
TAP (TYP.)
UEP
125A
UEP
125A
UEP
125A
UEP
125A
UEP
125A
LEVEL 4 ( RESIDENTIAL)
225A
3P
HOUSE-EM
LEVEL 3 ( RESIDENTIAL)
225NG
SOURCE CIRCUIT RATING SUBSCRIPT
EXAMPLES
225 NG
60 1/0
50 1
125
250
40 2
100
250
30 4
90 4/0
20 8
80 3/02/0
70 10
15 CIRCUIT
RATING
CONDUCTOR SIZE
SINGLE NEUTRAL
SINGLE NEUTRAL
CONDUCTOR SIZE
RATING
CIRCUIT
* SINGLE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR SIZES FOR CIRCUIT RATING 125 AND LESS G 3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR
2 8@4
2@3
7@4
2@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
2@4
[email protected]
5@4
6@4
3@4
2.5 2.5
2.5 3.5
[email protected]
3 4
3 2
0.5 0.75
1.5 1.25
1.5 0.5
2 2
2 1
NNG
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 2 NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS*,
1 GROUNDING CONDUCTORNNG
IG
1212
GND/
12 10
10 10
12 10
6 8
8 8
8 8
4 2
2 1
4 10
6 6
6 6
1 4
4 2
2 4
1 1
1/0
1/0
3/0
250
350
4/0
2/0
2 400
1 6
NNGINGN
CONDUIT SIZE (INCHES)
NGI
1 0.5
1.25 0.75
1 2
2 2
1.5 2
2.5 2
1.5 0.5
0.5 1
0.5 0.5
1 0.75
1.5 1.5
2 1.25
1.25 1.5
1.25 1.25
1.25 1.25
0.5 1.5
1.25 1.5
0.75 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
GNONE
15 RATING
CIRCUIT
0.5 0.5
1 0.75
0.5 0.5
1 0.75
1.25 1.25
1.25 1.5
1 1.25
1.25 1.25
1 1.25
20 30
50 40
70 80
90 100
60 0.5 0.5
WIRING SCHEDULE - COPPER CONDUCTORS
2 2.5
3 2.5
2.5 3
4 5
2@3
3.5 4
3 3
2 2
2 2.5
1.5 2
2 2
3 3.5
4 2.5
3 3.5
2@2 [email protected]
2.5 2.5
[email protected]
3.5 2.5
2.5 2.5
2@5
[email protected]
2@4
[email protected]
6@5
5@4
4@4
7@4
3@4
2@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
3@3
2@4
3@3
[email protected]
2@3
5@3
4@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
6@4
[email protected]
[email protected]
7@4
[email protected]@3 3@4
6@4
5@4
[email protected]
2@4
[email protected]
[email protected]
2@3
7@4
2@32@[email protected]@2.5
2 1.5
2 2
1.25 1.5
1.5 2
3 2.5
3.5 2@2
2.5 2.5
3 2@2
2 2.5
125
150
175
200
250
300
350
400
225
2@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
3@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
2@3
5@3
4@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
5@3
[email protected]
[email protected]
3@33@3
600
500
700
800
1600
1200
2000
2500
1000
[email protected]@2450
8@[email protected] 8@4
CONDUCTORS PER CONDUIT
8@[email protected]@3.53000
NONE
N
SUBSCRIPT
1 GROUNDING CONDUCTORNG
NGI
NNGI
SUBSCRIPT KEY
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, CONDUIT GROUND
1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR, 1 ISOLATED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR
1 GROUNDING CONDUCTOR, 1 ISOLATED GROUNDING CONDUCTOR110 1.25 1.5 1.5 2 2 2.5 4/0
400
500
400
350
500
300
350
250
500
3/0
250
350
2/0
4/0
3/0
1/0
PHASE/*
NEUTRAL
500
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR, CONDUIT GROUND 3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR,
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 1 NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR,
3 PHASE CONDUCTORS, 2 NEUTRAL CONDUCTORS*,
500
1.25 TAG
015
020
030
050
040
070
080
090
100
060
125
150
175
200
250
300
350
400
225
600
500
700
800
1600
1200
2000
2500
1000
450
3000
110
LEVEL 5 ( RESIDENTIAL)
LEVEL 2 ( RESIDENTIAL)
LEVEL 1 ( RESIDENTIAL)
PANEL-'H5SE'
225A
3P
HOUSE-EM
PANEL-'H5NE'
225A
3P
HOUSE
PANEL-'H1'
M
1000A
3P
M
225A
3P
400A
3P
PARKING
PANEL-'P1'
225A
3P
2-3'' C FOR FUTURE PV
400A
3P
LSIG
M
ROOF
400A
3P
SPARE
PANEL-'EM1'
800A
3P
SPARE
FIRE
PUMP
(75 HP)
CTRL
EM. LOADS
FP DISC.
800A
EM.
INVERTER
SVP
SERVICE
TRANSFORMER
MAIN SWITCHBOARD #2 "MSB1"
1000A, 208/120V, 3Ø, 4W,
100 KAIC
BONDING
JUMPER
125A/2P UTILITY
METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY
METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY
METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY
METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
125A/2P UTILITY
METER (TYP.)
125A/2P-M.C.B.
(TYP. OF 10)
225A
3P
HOUSE
PANEL-'H5S'
225A
3P
HOUSE
PANEL-'H5N'
EM.
INVERTER
50KW
EM.
INVERTER
50KW
TYPICALTYPICAL
TYPICAL TYPICAL
MMMMMMM
NEW (8)4" UG COUNDUIT
(3000A SERVICE)
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
208V, 3PH
4 WIRE, 65KAIC
TYPICAL
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001
G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:34:06 PM
E5.01
05/25/2022
1927400
SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
1 04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
------------------ - - ---- MITHUN
G-4J
r -
I
I
I
: : I _t__J~:,_~~?-~===~=:--:::r~ I I I
L __ _J •--- -~-~-~-~-
~-~-~-
~i
I
PLUMBING GENERAL NOTES
MP COMPONENT ANCHORAGE NOTES
DOMESTIC WATER AND DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS
PIPING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM BRACING NOTE
PIPING DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE BRACED TO
COMPLY WITH THE FORCES AND DISPLACEMENT PRESCRIBED
IN ASCE-7-10 SECTION 13.3 AS DEFINED IN ASCE-7-10 SECTION
13.6.5.6, 13.6.7, 13.6.8 AND 2016 CBC, SECTIONS 1616A.1.23, 1616A.1.24, 1616A.1.25, 1616A.1.26 AND 1705A13.3. THE
METHOD OF SHOWING BRACING AND ATTACHMENTS TO THE
STRUCTURE FOR THE IDENTIFIED DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ARE
AS NOTED BELOW. WHEN BRACING AND ATTACHMENTS ARE
BASED ON A PREAPPROVED INSTALLATION GUIDE (E.G.,
SMACNA OR OSHPD OPM), COPIES OF THE BRACING SYSTEM
INSTALLATION GUIDE OR MANUAL SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON
THE JOBSITE PRIOR TO THE START OF AND DURING THE
HANGING AND BRACING OF THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS. THE
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL VERIFY THE
ADEQUACY OF THE STRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THE HANGER
AND BRACE LOADS.
FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA
C
H
HWR
SS
SS
V
W
SD
L
OF
G
F
SP
WSP
SHW
SHWR
DOMESTIC HOT WATER RETURN
SANITARY SEWER - BELOW FLOOR
PIPE UP - TEE & ELBOW
PIPE DOWN - TEE & ELBOW
DOMESTIC COLD WATER
DOMESTIC HOT WATER
SANITARY SEWER - EXPOSED
VENT
WASTE
PG
PRESSURE GAUGE
THERMOMETER
STORM DRAIN
LEADER (ARCHITECTURAL
OVERFLOW DRAIN
DOWNSPOUT, SEE ARCH. DWGS.)
UNION
FLANGE
PIPE ANCHOR
PIPE GUIDE
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
REDUCER
PETE'S PLUG
STRAINER
CLEANOUT
CAP OR PLUGGED FITTING
BJ BALL JOINT
FLEXIBLE CONNECTION
HB
ANGLE OR STOP CHECK VALVE
NEEDLE VALVE
BUTTERFLY VALVE
RELIEF VALVE
VALVE ASSEMBLY
SOLENOID VALVE
BALANCING VALVE
CONTROL VALVE, THREE WAY
CONTROL VALVE, TWO WAY
GAS COCK
CHECK VALVE
GLOBE VALVE
GATE VALVE
HOSE BIBB
BALL VALVE
FS
FLOOR DRAINFD
FLOOR CLEANOUT
FLOOR SINK
RD ROOF DRAIN
OF OVERFLOW DRAIN
RR ROOF RECEPTOR
AREA DRAIN
NATURAL GAS
DIRECTION AND FLOW
FLOW METER
FLOW SWITCH
FLOW SWITCH/ SENSOR
PRESS SWITCH/ SENSOR
TEMP SWITCH/ SENSOR
FS
FS
PS
TS
PUMP - GENERIC
PUMP
FCO
AD
CO
BFP
BV
BLV
BFV
GV
GLV
PRV
FM
REDUCE PRESSURERPBP
BACKFLOW PREVENTER
TH
GRADE CLEANOUTGCO
P-TRAP
WALL CLEANOUTWCO
PD PLANTER DRAIN
EQUIPMENT TAG
PLUMBING RISER TAG
SHEET NOTE TAG
EXPANSION JOINT
EJ
POINT OF CONNECTION
CV
CVEQUIPMENT TAG
NEW WORK
EXISTING TO REMAIN
TO BE REMOVED
PRESSURE REDUCING
S
POINT OF CONNECTION
A(*) COMPRESSED AIR (*PSI WHERE REQUIRED)
AREA DRAINAD
ACCESS PANELAP
ACID VENTAV
ACID VENT THRU ROOFAVTR
ACID WASTEAW
BOILER BLOW DOWNBD
BOILER FEEDBF
BACKFLOW PREVENTERBFP
BUTTERFLY VALVEBFV
BRAKE / BOILER HORSEPOWERBHP
BALL VALVEBLV
BATH TUBBT
BALANCING VALVEBV
BACKWATER VALVEBWV
DOMESTIC COLD WATERC
CAP FOR FUTURECFF
CUBIC FEET PER HOURCFH
CARBON DIOXIDECO2
CAST IRONCI
CEILINGCLG
CLEANOUTCO
CONDENSER/CONDENSING/CONDENSATECOND
CHROME PLATEDCP
CHLORINATED POLYVINYL CHLORIDECPVC
CONDENSATE RETURN PUMPCRP
DOMESTIC COLD WATER (SOFT)CS
CLINICAL SINKCSK
CONNECT TO EXISTINGCTE
CONTROL VALVECV
CONDENSER WATER RETURNCWR
CONDENSER WATER SUPPLYCWS
DRY BULB TEMPERATUREDB
DEIONIZED WATERDE
DRINKING FOUNTAINDF
DISTILLED WATERDI
DOWNDN
DRAINDR
DRY STANDPIPEDSP
DRIP TRAPDT
EXISTING(E)
EXPANSION TANKET
FIRE HOSE CABINETFHC
FINISHEDFIN
FIRE LINEFL
FLANGEFLG
FLOORFLR
FLOW METERFM
FUEL OILFO
FUEL OIL FILLFOF
FUEL OIL GAUGEFOG
FUEL OIL RETURNFOR
PW PUMP WASTE
PTS PNEUMATIC TUBE SYSTEM
PSIG POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH GAUGE
PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
PRV PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE
PR PUMP RETURN
PLBG PLUMBING
PIV POST INDICATOR VALVE
PG PRESSURE GAUGE
PFF PLUG FOR FUTURE
PD PUMP DISCHAGE/PRESSURE DROP
OV OUTLET VELOCITY
OSY OUTSIDE STEM AND YOKE
OD OUTSIDE DIMENSION
NW NON-POTABLE WATER
NTS NOT TO SCALE
NO NORMALLY OPEN
NFPA NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION
NC NORMALLY CLOSED
(N) NEW
LPG LIQUID PETROLEUM GAS
LPDT LOW PRESSURE DRIP TRAP
LP LOW PRESSURE
LAT LEAVING AIR TEMPERATURE/LATENT
LA LABORATORY COMPRESSED AIR
L
RAINWATER
IW INDIRECT WASTE
IRRW IRRIGATION WATER
IPS IRON PIPE SIZE
IFS IN FURRED SPACE
IE INVERT ELEVATION
ID INSIDE DIAMETER
HZ HERTZ
HWR DOMESTIC HOT WATER RETURN
AC
HV HEATING AND VENTILATING
HU HUMIDIFIER
H(*) DOMESTIC HOT WATER (*TEMP)
GV GATE VALVE
GR GRADE
GPH GALLONS PER HOUR
GCO GRADE CLEANOUT
GA GAUGE
FSK FLOOR SINK
FS FLOW SWITCH
FPM FEET PER MINUTE
FOV FUEL OIL VENT
FUEL OIL SUPPLYFOS
ROOF DRAINRD
ROUGH IN AND CONNECTRIC
ROUGH IN ONLYRIO
REVOLUTIONS PER MINUTERPM
RELIEF VENT/ROOF VENTILATORRV
RELIEF VALVE VENTRVV
ABOVE FINISHED FLOORAFF
BUILDINGBLDG
BUILDING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMBMS
CONDENSATE DRAINCD
CHEMICAL FEEDCF
DRAWINGDWG
FUT FUTURE
PCHR PRIMARY CHILLED WATER RETURN
PCHS PRIMARY CHILLED WATER SUPPLY
REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOWRPBP
PREVENTER
L
COMBINATION WASTE & VENTCWV
FIRE DAMPERFDR
FIRE EXTINGUISHERFE
FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETFEC
FIRE HYDRANTFH
ALL PLUMBING COMPONENTS SHALL BE ANCHORED AND INSTALLED PER THE DETAILS ON THE DSA APPROVED CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. WHERE NO DETAIL IS INDICATED, THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS SHALL BE ANCHORED OR BRACED TO MEET THE FORCE AND DISPLACEMENT REQUIREMENTS PRESCRIBED IN THE 2016 CBC, SECTIONS 1616A.1.17 THROUGH 1616A.1.26, 1705A 13.3 AND ASCE-7-10 CHAPTER 13, 26 AND 30.
1. ALL PERMANENT EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS.
2. TEMPORARY OR MOVABLE EQUIPMENT THAT IS
PERMANENTLY ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING UTILITY
SERVICES SUCH WATER.
3. MOVABLE EQUIPMENT WHICH IS STATIONED IN ONE PLACE
FOR MORE THAN 8 HOURS AND HEAVIER THAN 400
POUNDS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ANCHORED WITH
TEMPORARY ATTACHMENTS.
THE FOLLOWING PLUMBING COMPONENTS SHALL BE
POSITIVELY ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE, BUT THE
ATTACHMENT NEED NOT BE DETAILED ON THE PLANS. THESE
COMPONENTS SHALL HAVE FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONS
PROVIDED BETWEEN THE COMPONENT AND ASSOCIATED
PIPING.
A. COMPONENTS WEIGHING LESS THAN 400 POUNDS AND
HAVE A CENTER OF MASS LOCATED 4 FEET OR LESS
ABOVE THE ADJACENT FLOOR OR ROOF LEVEL THAT
DIRECTLY SUPPORT THE COMPONENT.
B. COMPONENTS WEIGHING LESS THAN 20 POUNDS, OR IN
THE CASE OF DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMS, LESS THAN 5
POUNDS PER FOOT, WHICH ARE SUSPENDED FROM A
ROOF OR FLOOR OR HUNG FROM A WALL.
FOR THOSE ELEMENTS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE DETAILS ON
THE APPROVED DRAWINGS, THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
IN GENERAL RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OR STRUCTURAL
ENGINEER DELEGATED RESPONSIBILITY AND THE DSA
DISTRICT STRUCTURAL ENGINEER. THE PROJECT
INSPECTOR WILL VERIFY THAT ALL COMPONENTS AND
EQUIPMENT HAVE BEEN ANCHORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE ABOVE REQUIREMENTS.
OPTION 1: DETAILED ON THE APPROVED DRAWINGS
WITH PROJECT SPECIFIC NOTES AND DETAILS.
OPTION 2: SHALL COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE
OSHPD PRE-APPROVED DETAILS (CONTRACTOR
SHALL SUBMIT APPLICABLE OPM NUMBERS).
OPM-0052-13 DATED 8/17/2017
PLUMBING PIPING (PP):
OPTION 3: WHERE ANCHORAGE, SUPPORT AND BRACING
ARE NOT FULLY DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS AND
PRE-APPROVED SYSTEMS ARE NOT USED, CONTRACTOR
SHALL SUBMIT DESIGNS AND CALCULATIONS OF
PROPOSED SYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SPECIFICATION SECTION 220548, PARAGRAPH 1.6.B.2.
PP
PP
X
X
PP X
1. ENTIRE INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREME NTS OF
THE 2019 EDITION OF CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE AND BUILDING
CODE, ADOPTED EDITIONS OF NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION CODES,
ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS, AND
AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTIONS.
2. COORDINATE PLUMBING SYSTEMS WITH WORK OF OTHER TRADES PRIOR TO ANY FABRICATION OR INSTALLATION. PROVIDE ALL
FITTINGS, OFFSETS, AND TRANSITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR A
COMPLETE WORKABLE INSTALLATION.
3. COORDINATE LOCATIONS OF ALL ROOF OPENINGS WITH
STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
4. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH
THE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND
APPLICABLE CODES. PROVIDE ALL FITTINGS, TRANSITIONS, VALVES,
AND OTHER DEVICES REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE WORKABLE
INSTALLATION.
5. MAINTENANCE LABELS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO ALL PLUMBING
EQUIPMENT AND A MAINTENANCE MANUAL SHALL BE PROVIDED TO OWNER.
6. PIPES SHALL BE SUPPORTED AND BRACED PER 2019 CBC SECTION 1613A GUIDELINES FOR SEISMIC RESTRAINTS OF MECHANICAL
SYSTEMS AND PLUMBING PIPING SYSTEMS OF NONSTRUCTURAL
COMPONENTS.
7. HOUSEKEEPING PADS SHALL BE MINIMUM 4 INCHES HIGH WITH A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES CLEAR AROUND EQUIPMENT.
8. ALL CLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, 2019 EDITION.
9. VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL OFFSETS SHOWN IN PIPES INDICATE THE GENERAL RELATIONSHIP OF THE SYSTEMS. PROVIDE
ADDITIONAL OFFSETS SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN AS REQUIRED TO SUIT CONSTRUCTION AND WORK DONE BY TRADES.
10. DRAWINGS ARE ESSENTIALY DIAGRAMMATIC TO THE EXTENT THAT
ALL OFFSETS, BENDS, SPECIAL FITTINGS AND EXACT LOCATIONS ARE NOT INDICATED. EXAMINE DRAWINGS AND PREMISES IN ORDER
TO DETERMINE BEST METHODS, EXACT LOCATIONS, ROUTES AND
BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS. INSTALL APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT IN ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS.
11. FOLLOW AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE LAYOUT INDICATED ON DRAWINGS.
12. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATIONS OF PLUMBING FIXTURES.
13. ALL PIPING IN FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE CONCEALED. EXPOSED
PIPING, WHERE NECESSARY, SHALL BE RUN AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE AND TIGHT TO THE WALLS.
14. LOCATIONS OF PIPING, FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT INDICATED
ON DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, AND SHALL BE
CHANGED TO MEET THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL
CONDITIONS AS REQUIRED, AT NO EXTRA COST TO THE
OWNER.
15. ALL PLUMBING FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL HAVE
ISOLATING VALVES, ACCESSIBLE SHUT-OFF VALVE ON ALL
WATER SUPPLY LINES
16. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT
ELEVATION OF UTILITIES IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND PIPING.
17. INSTALL ALL VALVES, CONTROLS, ETC, IN ACCESSIBLE
LOCATIONS. PROVIDE ADEQUATELY SIZED ACCESS DOORS
WHERE REQUIRED.
18. PLUMBING CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL FLOOR DRAINS WITH
WATER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK AND TESTING.
19. INSULATE ALL WATER PIPING PER TITLE 24 REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.
20. ABSOLUTE ACCURACY OF DRAWING AND SPECIFICATIONS
CANNOT BE GUARANTEED. DESIGN DRAWINGS ARE
DIAGRAMMATIC IN NATURE. WHILE EVERY EFFORT HAS BEEN
MADE TO COORDINATE THE LOCATION OF EQUIPMENT, PIPING,
ETC., WITH OTHER TRADES, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE
CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE EXACT REQUIREMENTS
GOVERNED BY ACTUAL JOB CONDITIONS.
21. PENETRATION OF RATED ASSEMBLY SHALL BE FIRE-STOPPED.
STOPPING SYSTEM (MATERIAL AND DESIGN) SHALL CONFORM
TO BOTH FLAME (F) AND TEMPERATURE(T) RATING AS
REQUIRED BY LOCAL BUILDING CODE AND AS TESTED BY
NATIONALLY ACCEPTED TEST AGENCIES PER ASTM E814 OR
REPRESENTABLE OF FIELD CONDITION.
22. COMBINE ALL VERTICAL VENTS WHERE PRACTICAL PRIOR TO ROOF PENETRATION.
23. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO INSTALL ALL
WORK TO MEET OR EXCEED MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
STIPULATED IN CURRENT ISSUE OF APPLICABLE STANDARDS,
CODES, OR REGULATIONS.
24. ALL PLUMBING WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH LEAD FREE
REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 116875 OF CALIFORNIA HEALTH
AND SAFETY CODE.
25. INSTALL ALL PIPING TO AVOID ARCHITECTURAL FRAMING,
STRUCTURAL MEMBERS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION.
COORDINATE PIPING LAYOUT WITH ALL OTHER CONTRACT
DIVISIONS OF WORK BEFORE FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION.
26. PROVIDE VALVED DRAINS AT THE LOW POINTS IN EACH PIPING SYSTEM.
FIRE MAIN
FIRE
SPRINKLER
WET STANDPIPE
SOLAR HOT WATER
SOLAR HOT WATER RETURN
CONDENSATE DRAIN
RISER DESIGNATION
COLD&HOT WATER
RISER DESIGNATION
SANITARY/VENT
RISER DESIGNATION
STORM DRAIN
RISER DESIGNATION
FIRE STANDPIPE
RISER DESIGNATION
ALTERNATE SHEET
NOTE TAGS
KITCHEN
EQUIPMENT TAGS
SIGHT DRAINSD
SHOWERSH
SINKSK
SHEET METALSM
FIRE SPRINKLERSP
SPRINKLER DRAINSPD
STEAM TRAPST
STANDARDSTD
TRENCH DRAINTD
THERMOMETERTH
SANITARY VENTV
VENT THRU ROOFVTR
HB HOSE BIBB
AIR CONDITIONING
MBH THOUSAND BRITISH THERMAL
MA MEDICAL COMPRESSED AIR
LWT LEAVING WATER TEMPERATURE
UNITS PER HOUR
MFR MANUFACTURER
LVG LEAVING
LV LAVATORY
LPS LOW PRESSURE STEAM
LPR LOW PRESSURE CD RETURN
LWCO LOW WATER CUT-OFF
ENTERING WATER PRESSUREEWT
FLEXIBLE CONNECTIONFC
FLOOR CLEANOUTFCO
FLOOR DRAINFD
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONFDC
WASTEW
WATER CLOSETWC
WALL CLEANOUTWCO
WEIGHTWT
VAPOR VENTVV
EQ
#
ABC
#
#
#
EQ-#
EQ-# EQ-#
CH
#
SD
#
CD
#
WV
#
F
#
DOMESTIC
PIPING & FITTINGS
DRAINS & CLEANOUTS
TAGS
VALVES
SENSORS & SWITCHES
PUMPS
GENERAL
SYMBOLS PLUMBING LEGEND
(SOME OF THE ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS SHOWN MAY NOT BE USED ON THIS PROJECT.)Some of the symbols shown may not be used on this project.
FIRE PROTECTION
INDUSTRIAL
g&[email protected]
San Francisco, CA. 94133-1449
415 655 4000
C O N S U L T I N G E N G I N E E R S
2351 Powell Street
&
415 655 4001
G U T T M A N N B L A E V O E T
P
E
F
SEATTLE / Pier 56, 1201 Alaskan Way, #200
Seattle, WA 98101 / 206.623.3344
SAN FRANCISCO / 660 Market Street, #300
San Francisco, CA 94104 / 415.956.0688
LOS ANGELES / 5837 Adams Blvd
Culver City, CA 90232 / 323.937.2150
mithun.com
®
DESIGN PARTNER
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM MEMBERS
PROJECT DESIGNER
TITLE
PROJECT NO.
DATE
SHEET NUMBER
© 2016 MITHUN, INC.
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE 30" x 42"
Mithun, Inc. Disclaimer
Any information contained in these electronic files is for informational purposes only. Recipient acknowledges that the information contained herein may either be in draft form or may be revised at any time. Accordingly, Mithun, Inc. makes no representations as to the accuracy of this information. If for any reason a conflict exists between information contained herein and the stamped, signed documents, the information on the signed documents is to be interpreted as correct. In addition, errors and discrepancies can be inadvertently introduced into electronic media by differing hardware, software and operators.
All information contained in this electronic data prepared by Mithun, Inc. as instruments of service are the property of Mithun, Inc., which expressly reserves all ownership rights including any common law, statutory or copyrights. This electronic data is intended for use on the project specified, and shall not be used or relied upon in part or in whole, for any future work on the same building(s) or site(s) or for any other project. The recipient of this information shall not copy, use or modify this information without the prior written authorization of Mithun, Inc. The drawings and/or data contained herein conform to Mithun, Inc.'s standard specification for software and file format. Mithun, Inc. will review any request for providing data in a different file format(s) if such a request is made in writing by the original recipient. Such a request may be considered to be a change in services.
The recipient agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, indemnify, and hold Mithun, Inc., its shareholders and employees, harmless from and against any claim, liability, demands, losses, damages, penalties or cost (including attorney's fees and defense costs, whether or not a suit is filed) arising or allegedly arising out of any unauthorized use, reuse or modification or in any way connected with, the incompatibility, readability, or durability of the information contained herein by the recipient or any person or entity that acquires or obtains this information thereon from the recipient without written authorization from Mithun, Inc. This agreement to defend, indemnify and hold Mithun, Inc. harmless also applies to the use of this information on any project or construction site without the involvement of Mithun, Inc. in the construction phase services normally associated with such a project.
Your use of the attached/enclosed media, shall constitute an acceptance of the above.
PROJECT
LOCATION
PREPARED FOR
NO. DATE REVISION
CHECK
DATE ISSUE
CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
LINCOLN STREET
VICINITY MAP
COUNTY STAMP SPACE:
5/25/2022 1:29:35 PM
P0.01
05/25/2022
1927400
LEGEND, SYMBOLS,
GENERAL NOTES &
DRAWING LIST
CIVIC CENTER FAMILY
HOUSING
1601 CIVIC CENTER DR.
SANTA CLARA, CA
95050
GPA RESUBMISSION 2
AP
KB / SA
SA / AK
12.08.2020 PLANNING SUBMITTAL
02.5.2021 100% SCHEMATIC DESIGN
8.23.2021 GPA SUBMITTAL
11.19.2021 50% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
04.08.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 1
05.0 9.2022 100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
05.2 5.2022 GPA RESUBMISSION 2
MAIN PIPE SIZE (INCHES) 4"
EDITED BY JT/RJ
PRESSURE LOSS (PSI/100 FT) 5.81
MAX. LENGTH (FT) 510 UNLIMITED 510
VELOCITY (FT/S) 7.25
LAST EDITED 3/23/2022
TOTAL DEVELOPED HEIGHT (FEET) 100 MAIN SANITARY
PIPE
SIZE 6" 8" 6"
TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH (FEET) 600
LOCATION Santa Clara, CA
PIPE MATERIAL COPPER TYPE L
ORIENTATION VERTICAL HORIZONTAL VERTI CAL /
HORIZONTAL
TOTAL WATER DEMAND - FLUSH VALVE (GPM) 270.00
PROJECT NAME CIVIC CENTER
TOTAL WATER DEMAND (WSFU) 1443.00
TYPE WASTE VENT
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: APPENDIX A 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: TABLE 703.2 PROJECT NUMBER MIT-002
TOTAL WATER SUPPLY DEMAND TOTAL SANITARY WASTE DRAINAGE S IZING TOTAL BUILDING WSFU: 1,443 1,326 285
Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Flushometer Valve WC 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 5 3 4 4 4 Service or Mop Basin MS 1 1 1 1 1 0 5 1/2 3 15 3 3 15 14 Kitchen, domestic KS 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1/2 1.5 1.5 1 1/2 2 2 2 Lavatory LV 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1/2 1 1 1 1/2 1 1 1
Hose Bibb, each additional (same branch) HB 3 0 0 0 0 3 6 1/2 1 6 - - - - Hose Bibb HB 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1/2 2.5 5 - - - -
Floor Drain (2") FD 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 - - - 2 2 6 6
Dishwasher, domestic DW 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1/2 1.5 1.5 1 1/2 2 2 2 Clothes Washer, domestic WM 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 1/2 4 56 2 3 42 26
COMMON AREAS FIXTURE LABEL MIN SUPPLY
BRANCH SIZE (IN)
WSFU
PUBLIC
TOTAL WSFU /
FIXTURE MIN SIZE TRAP DFU
PUBLIC TOTAL DFU TOTAL GPM
Water Closet, 1.6 GPF Gravity Tank WC 5 33 33 33 33 0 137 1/2 2.5 342.5 3 3 411 105.5 Kitchen, domestic KS 4 26 26 26 26 0 108 1/2 1.5 162 1 1/2 2 216 68.2 Lavatory LV 5 33 33 33 33 0 137 1/2 1 137 1 1/2 1 137 52.5 Dishwasher, domestic DW 4 26 26 26 26 0 108 1/2 1.5 162 1 1/2 2 216 68.2 Bathtub (or Combo Bath/Shower) BT 5 33 33 33 33 0 137 1/2 4 548 1 1/2 2 274 79.8
APARTMENT FIXTURE LABEL MIN SUPPLY
BRANCH SIZE
WSFU
PRIVATE
TOTAL WSFU /
FIXTURE MIN SIZE TRAP DFU
PRIVATE TOTAL DFU TOTAL GPM
3 BEDROOM APT 3BR 1 7 7 7 7 0 29 1" C / UNIT 14.75 COLD / 9.75... 18 2 BEDROOM APT 2BR 2 6 6 6 6 0 26 3/4" C / UNIT 8.5 C OLD / 6 HOT 11 1 BEDROOM APT 1BR 0 7 7 7 7 0 28 3/4" C / UNIT 8.5 C OLD / 6 HOT 11 STUDIO APT SBR 1 6 6 6 6 0 25 3/4" C / UNIT 8.5 C OLD / 6 HOT 11 APARTMENT TYPE TAGS 1st FLOOR 2nd FLOOR 3rd FLOOR 4th FLOOR 5th FLOOR ROOF TOTAL WATER SUPPLY SIZE SYSTEM WSFU / UNIT TOTAL WSFU / UNIT
WATER SUPPLY INFORMATION
2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: APPENDIX A, TABLE A103.1 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE: TABLE 702.1
DOMESTIC SUPPLY LOAD CALCULATIONS SANITARY WASTE DRAINAGE LOAD
CALCULATIONS
--
~ MITHUN
--0--0 -c:J-
-
-0---
///-/-/-/- --QI- ----lOI-
-
--6-
0 ----i, --d<I-
~i
----N-
e -
--&-
---- --+-o= ---ir.- ---II--
El - x- -0 =-r- -----0----
◊ --___.,, -+-
88 -C>-
±
---i,;1-
88 --<I>--
la]
8 ,. .G •.IHltl"°"~ IIUll~lt-~
-+-
Q
,. ---e- .
D \
.
--e:i-- . t ~---\ \ ----J!- ,el
___5!,_ '!"
_1_
___5!,_
___5!,_
□ _l_
□
□
AJl'PUCANTfflFOfU1ATIOH (BT APPUc:Nn)
I ~Tb7122n0
.-m..to.HT e~e.s. 255 W Jullom St Suite 200
IJINci.!lfPHONEPfOl4011-3t6-S567
ll'PtJC>NTEW.ll.:p1mnnQcwdau;om
PIIW£ CTlNfORMAOOO{ IYAPIJU CAfff)
Pl!,ilH:l"~1 CMcCen~ Atl,Vlme nta
PRQ]KT~: 11501 Cl~ICCenre<Or .
!Approximatel y 119 affordable apartmenls 5 stories
PRi)JcIT OBOIPnC,N, lover a podium 1J<1ra9e
I
IJlf/1~9-006 l ai.JJI..DINGT"t'PE(tAIJFORHl,\Bt.llLDlf«i~ tto,OffMl!Wli(S}TtJ aE A.DWa)13
A.!r,'IM't'Di!..'-Hf{S)lrl0.,204.J . ... 2'} , 16' 1
Plta:JECT HOOEUIIG DATA (CIT'I' TO PROYIDl lO APPUCANT ) ;u)WHVl)U..lf'Tl5}N0-14 29 lsrAm:•~~Cs)oo .,\641
~PR£SSURE{~):38 AT5AM I STATICPflES5Ulll:{l>il): 46AT SAM ITmRDW(GJM)12010FOR 120MIN
~
City of Santa Clara
Agenda Report
1500 Warburton Avenue
Santa Clara, CA 95050
santaclaraca.gov
@SantaClaraCity
22-1389 Agenda Date: 11/15/2022
REPORT TO COUNCIL
SUBJECT
Tentative Meeting Agenda Calendar (TMAC)
COUNCIL PILLAR
Enhance Community Engagement and Transparency
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The purpose of the TMAC is to provide the public advanced notifications of tentative dates of Council Study Sessions, Joint Council/Commission meetings, as well as Council Public Hearing and General Business agenda items. It is important to note that the TMAC is a Tentative Calendar planning tool and reports listed are subject to change due to Public Hearing publication requirements and agenda management.
City of Santa Clara Printed on 11/10/2022Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™
11/10/2022 3:24:14 PM
________
Wednesday, November 16, 2022 Special Council Meeting – Grand Jury Report
Tuesday, December 6, 2022 Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting
Study Session
22-1058 Public Hearing on the Tasman East Specific Plan amendment and potential additional parkland options
Special Orders of Business
22-1307 Recognition of the 2022 Santa Clara Parade of Champions
22-1402 Verbal Report from the Chief Emergency Services Officer regarding COVID-19 Pandemic
22-1403 Verbal Report Update from City Manager Regarding the Local Drought Emergency
Public Hearing/General Business
22-1062 Action on FY 2021/22 Budget Year-End Report and Approve the Related Budget Amendments
22-1231 PLACEHOLDER: Action on a Resolution Amending Rate Schedules for Electric Services for All Classes of Customers, Effective January 1, 2023
22-1381 Action on a Status Report on the BMX lease agreement between the City of Santa Clara and the Police Activities League
Tuesday, December 13, 2022 Joint Council and Authorities Concurrent and Stadium Authority Meeting
Public Hearing/General Business
22-897 Adopt a Resolution Declaring the Results of the Canvass of Returns of the Consolidated General Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022 with the Statewide Gubernatorial Election
City of Santa Clara
Tentative Meeting Agenda Calendar
Note: These proposed dates are tentative and subject to change based on staff capacity, meeting management, and deferred items by Council requiring other items to free up agenda meeting time.
Tuesday, January 10, 2023 Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting
Study Session
23-1316 Study Session to report on the work of the City of Santa Clara Homelessness Taskforce and gather feedback on the Draft Homelessness Response Plan
Public Hearing/General Business
22-276 Housing Element Update Adoption
Tuesday, January 31, 2023 Joint Council and Authorities Concurrent and Stadium Authority Meeting
Study Session
23-1633 Mission City Memorial Park (Cemetery) Operations - Study Session
Public Hearing/General Business
Agenda Items TBD
Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Council and Authorities Concurrent Meeting
Public Hearing/General Business
Agenda Items TBD
Tuesday, February 21, 2023 Joint Council and Authorities Concurrent and Stadium Authority Meeting
Public Hearing/General Business
22-789 Informational Report on adding a potential public art fee for private development applicable to projects in the Patrick Henry Drive Specific Plan area
February 27/28, 2023 Council Priority Setting Meeting - Tentative
AGENDA ITEMS TO BE SCHEDULED TO A FUTURE DATE
22-000 Response to Vice Mayor Jain’s Written Request to Discuss making the Youth Soccer Park Parking Lot available when there are no events at the Youth Soccer Park (soccer gets absolute priority) in order to Generate Revenue for the City approved to be agendized to a future meeting
22-184 Action on a Council Written Request (Council Policy 030) Submitted by Councilmember Jain Requesting to expand the scope of a previous council written request relating to the Youth Soccer Park Parking Lot (Council Policy 030) agenda item already approved to be agendized at future meeting for discussion with additional topics: 1) Under Measure-R, can the City contract out annually to the SCYSL to manage parking the parking lot as it sees fit and charge for parking when there is no soccer activity at YSP? The Parks and Rec department would retain control and could override any decision by the SCYSL. 2) It is my understanding that there have been games at the YSP but no practices this past year due to lack of City staff to schedule practices. I would like a discussion of how scheduling works at the YSP and Reed and Grant. Are only SCYSL events allowed at YSP? Under Measure R, could the SCYSL do its own scheduling, again with override authority (ultimate control) by Parks and Rec? 3) Can the City prioritize staffing a scheduler for YSL as Parks and Rec begins to hire more staff that was reduced under COVID so that we can start having practices at YSP? 4) If staffing for scheduling is short for YSP, can the City look at acquiring some facilities scheduling software to make the process more efficient? SCUSD uses Facilitron. Perhaps this software could be used to schedule all parks and rec facilities. It would be nice for the public to make scheduling requests online to Parks and Rec for meeting rooms, picnic areas, etc. and 5) Can we get a report of the staffing and budget needed to support soccer at YSL and Reed and Grant?
22-000 Action on a Written Petition (Council Policy 030), Submitted by Brian Doyle, to Place an Agenda Item at a Future Council Meeting to Discuss an Explanation by Councilmember Kevin Park of the Apparent Inconsistent Statements in Official Filings Regarding His Employment and Sources of Income – Return at a later date upon completion of litigation.