South Gate City Council
June 25, 2024

shall be put are any one or more of the following:
a. Decoration of any public place in the area;
b. Promotion of public events which are to take place on or in public places in the area; c. The general promotion of retail trade activities in the area. (Ord. 1129 § 2 (part), 1970)

2.64.050 Fund creatiorource of funds-Purpose.

There is hereby created and established a special fund designated as the "parking and business improvement area fund." All funds derived from the additional levy of the general business license tax made pursuant to this chapter, and any other moneys the city council may from time to time transfer thereto, shall be deposited in said parking and business improvement area fund. The parking and business improvement area fund shall be used exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in Section 2.64.040. (Ord. 1129 § 2 (part), 1970)

2.64.060 Rate of levy of businesses.

The initial or additional rate or levy of the business license tax imposed upon the businesses within said area, is hereby fixed, levied, determined and established as follows:

That the amount of levy upon each such business shall be in an amount equal to the general business license tax applicable to each such business as specified and provided in the ordinances and resolutions of the city of South Gate as of the first day of January, 1971 but in no event shall said levy exceed the sum of four hundred dollars for any one licensee.
(Ord. 1148 § 1, 1971 : Ord. 1129 § 2 (part), 1970)

2.64.070 Payment of tax.

The additional rate or levy of the license tax hereby levied shall be due and payable and shall be paid at the same time and in the same manner that the business license tax imposed by Chapter 2.08 of this title is due and payable in accordance with the terms of this chapter. (Ord. 1129 § 2 (part), 1970)

2.64.080 Applicability of general business license provisions.

The provisions of Sections 2.08.060, 2.08.085, 2.08.135, 2.08.195, 2.08.270, 2.08.295, 2.08.300, 2.08.335,

2.08.340, 2.08.350, 2.08.355, 2.08.375, 2.08.430, 2.08.440, 2.08.455, 2.08.460, and 2.08.470 shall be applicable to all businesses in the area described in Section 2.64.020 and subject to the additional levy of the general The South Gate Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2022-07-CC, passed July 26, 2022. 148
South Gate Municipal Code Chapter 2.64 PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA

BUSINESS LICENSE

business license tax imposed by Section 2.64.050.
(Ord. 1129 § 2 (part), 1970)

2.64.090 Payment prerequisite to license.

No business license shall be issued pursuant to this title unless the additional business license tax imposed by this chapter is paid together with the business license payable pursuant to and imposed by Section 2.64.050. (Ord. 1129 § 2 (part), 1970)

2.64.100 Tweedy Mile advisory board.

The city council shall appoint a Tweedy Mile advisory board pursuant to Section 36530 of the California Streets and Highways Code in order to make recommendations to the city council on the expenditure of revenues derived from the levy assessments on proposed improvements and activities and on the method and basis of levying assessments
(Ord. 2286 § 1 (part), 9-27-2011 )

2.64.110 Membership.

The Tweedy Mile advisory board shall consist of five members each of which shall be appointed by a city council member. The members of the Tweedy Mile advisory board shall be appointed for staggered, three-year terms. (Ord. 2286 e) 1 (part), 9-27-2011 )

2.64.120 Meetings.

1. The regular meetings of the Tweedy Mile advisory board shall be held not less frequently than once each calendar year, and otherwise as determined by the Tweedy Mile advisory board. The Tweedy Mile advisory board shall meet in the South Gate city council chambers.

2. The Tweedy Mile advisory board shall annually elect a chairperson and vice chairperson from among its members.

3. Three members of the Tweedy Mile advisory board constitute a minimum quorum for the transaction of business.

4. The affirmative vote of at least a majority of the then present members of the Tweedy Mile advisory board shall be necessary to take action.
(Ord. 2286 § 1 (part), 9-27-2011)

2.64.130 Duties.

The South Gate Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2022-07-CC, passed July 26, 2022.

Iq
149
South Gate Municipal Code Chapter 2.64 PARKING AND BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT AREA

BUSINESS LICENSE

The duties of the Tweedy Mile advisory board are as follows:

1. The Tweedy Mile advisory board shall prepare an annual report specifying the expenses, services, activities, and programs to be funded by the assessment, in accordance of the requirements of Sections 36530 and 36533 of the California Streets and Highways Code. Upon approval of the annual report, the city council shall follow the procedures set forth in Section 36534 of the California Streets and Highways Code for the conduct of a public hearing on the assessments for the fiscal year referred to in the annual report.

2. The Tweedy Mile advisory board will work together with city staff to consider new business, to evaluate whether or not proposed solutions are viable and cost-effective, and to submit from time to time recommendations to the city council for review and approval.

3. To perform such duties and responsibilities as may be assigned by the city council from time to time. (Ord. 2286 § 1 (part), 9-27-2011 )

2.64.140 Staff representation.

The city manager shall assign staff to ensure the effective functioning of the Tweedy Mile advisory board, including designating the secretary to the Tweedy Mile advisory board who shall be a city employee responsible for the preparation of all minutes of all meetings of the board, and the filing of the approved minutes with the city clerk. The minutes shall include a record of board member attendance, a brief summary of presentations made if any, actions taken by the Tweedy Mile advisory board, and the vote of each member on any item upon which action is taken. Minutes need not be verbatim transcripts of the conduct of the meetings, but should be sufficient to adequately characterize the discussions, deliberations and actions taken. (Ord. 2286 § 1 (part), 9-27-2011)
The South Gate Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 2022-07-CC, passed July 26, 2022. '2/0
150
Office of the
South Gate City Clerk
Item No. 6
JUN 1 9 202't
FILED Ciffl of South Gate
1,' r2(;iH CITY COUNCIL
AeENDA JB3J[LL
For the Regular Meeting o'f: June 25, 2024
riginating Department: Public Works
Arturo Cervantes
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT N0. 2 TO CONTRACT N0. 2020-53-CC FOR THE

MANAGEMENT SERVICES OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROGRAM AND FAT,

OIL, AND GREASE CONTROL PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE AND JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

PURPOSE: To approve Ai'nendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2020-53-CC to extend the term of the agreement with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., for one year to secure services necessary for the management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: The City Council will consider:
a. Approving Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2020-53-CC ("Ainendment No. 2") with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., to extend management services for the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program for one year, not-to-exceed amount of $56,760; and
b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2020-53-CC in a form approved by the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the General Fund. Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2020-53-CC is in the amount of $56,760, and it will be funded with Sewer Funds to be budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 in Sewer Funds.

Agreement 2020-53-CC Amount
Fiscal Year 2020-21 $54,435
Fiscal Year 2021-22 $54,435
Fiscal Year 2022-23 $54,435
Fiscal Year 2023-24 (Amendment 1) $56,760
Fiscal Year 2024-25 (Amendment 2) $56,760
Total $276,825
ANALYSIS: Contract 2020-53-CC provides specialty services for the management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program with the support of consultant services. Contract 2020-53-CC provides for an extension of services. Staff is recommending a one-year extension. John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., has provided services 151
in tlie last four years with the appropriate level of expertise, and provided services that met expectations and were witliin budget. They are familiar with City processes and the needs of the businesses that are being serviced. Amendment No. 2 is recomi'nended to extend services one additional year.

BACKGROUND: The Industrial Waste ("IW") and Fat, Oil, and Grease ("FOG") Control Programs are part of the California State Water Resources Control Board's 2006 Waste Discharge Requirements Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems ("WDR 888"). These Programs regulate facilities which generate, handle and/or dispose of fats, oils, grease and industrial wastewater that are discharged into the City's sanitary sewer system. The goal of the Programs is to manage sewage discharges, and to prevent sewage discharges that have the potential to cause damage to the City-owned sanitary sewer system.

The City has issued approximately 240 Industrial Waste Discharge Permits to active businesses that are inspected one to four times per year, depending on the type of business. Each of these businesses is required to have on-site treatment facilities such as grease traps or sand and grease interceptors to remove harmful elements from their discharge. Industrial Waste Discharge Permits are valid for five years; however, inspections of one to four times per year are required.

On July 14, 2020, the City Council approved Contract No. 2020-53-CC with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., for professional services for the Management for Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program for a three-year term through and including June 30, 2023, in the total aggregate amount of $163,305 or annual amount of $54,435.

On March 28, 2023, the City Council approved Ai'nendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2020-53-CC with John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., for a one-year term extension not to exceed the amount of $56,760.

Under Contract No. 2020-53-CC, John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc., provides services which include program management, inspections of new and existing commercial and industrial businesses, supports of enforcement of tlie Municipal Code 6.62 (Industrial Waste), evaluates and processes Industrial Waste reports, reviews and approves developer plans, implements Quality Assurance ("QA") procedures, educates the public, and attends local community events to promote the Programs.

ATT ACHMENTS: A.

B.

C.

D.

LC:lc
Proposed Amendment No. 2 (Including Exhibit A)
Amendment No. 1
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
Proposal for extension by John L. Hunter & Associates, Inc. a2,- 152
Attachment A
Amendment No. 2 to
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
AMENDMENT N0. 2TO CONTRACTN0. 2020-53-CC FORTHE MANAGEMENT

SERVICES OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROGRAM AND FAT, OIL, AND

GREASE CONTROL PROGRAM BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE AND JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

This Ai'nendmentNo. 2 to Contract No. 2020-53-CC ("AmendmentNo. 2") forManagement Services of tlie Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program ("Agreement") is made and entered into on June 27, 2023, by and between tlie City of South Gate, a municipal corporation ("City"), and John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc. ("Consultant"). The City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, on July 14, 2020, the City Council approved the Agreement for a three-year ten'n through and including June 30, 2023, with an aru'iual sum of Fifty-Four Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Five Dollars ($54,435) and a total aggregate not-to-exceed of One Hundred Sixty Three Thousand Three Hundred Five Dollars ($163,305); and WHEREAS, on March 28, 2023, the City Council approved Amendment No. l to the Agreement for a one-year term through and including June 30, 2024, with a annual sum of Fifty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Dollars ($56,760) and a total aggregate not-to-exceed of Two Hundred Twenty Thousand Sixty Five Dollars ($220,065); and WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to execute this ArnendmentsNo. 2 to extend the Agreement for an additional one-year ten'n through and including June 30, 2024, and increase compensation for an amount not-to-exceed Fifty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Donars ($56,760) for Fiscal Year 2024/2025. The total aggregate oftheAgreement, AmendmentNo. 1, and Amendment No. 2 is a total sum of Two Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($276,825).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. TERM OF AGREEMENT.

The ternn of the Agreement is hereby extended from June 30, 2024, through and including June 30, 2025, inclusive.

2. COMPENSATION.

The total amount of compensation paid by the City to Consultant for this Agreement shall not-to-exceed the sum of Fifty-Six Thousand Seven Hundred Sixty Dollars ($56,760).

The total sum of the Agreement, AmendmentNo. I and Amendment No. 2, is a total sum of Two Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Dollars ($276,825).

153
Ai'nendment No. 2 to
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
EFFECT OF .=UVIENDMENT.

Except as expressly amended herein, all otl'ier terms and conditions of Agreement as originally approved on July 14, 2020, sliall remain in full force and effect. Furtherinore, City reserves the right to augi'nent or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary. All capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meanings attributed to them in the Agreement.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally]

'f 154
Amendment No. 2 to
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Parties hereto have carised this Ai'nendment No. l to be execrited and attested by their respective officers thereunto duly arithorized.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Gil Hurtado, Mayor
Dated:

ATTEST:

B7:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

B7:
ffil F. Salinas, City Attorney
JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC:

BY:

John L. Hunter, President
Dated:

5 155
@JLHA

MUNICIPAL CONTRACTOR
March 4, 2024
Arturo Cervantes
Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works
City of South Gate
8650 California Ave
South Gate, CA 90280
Subject: Extension of Professional Seniices for the Management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control
Dear Arturo Cervantes:

We at John L. Hunter & Associates (JLHA) welcome the opportunity to continue providing our services to the City of South Gate with regard to the environmental programs of Industrial Waste (IW) Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control. Our existing scope of work with the City will apply for the one-year service extension.

This project will be on a time and materials basis. We will provide consultant services not to exceed the budgetary amount of S56,760 without the City's prior authorization. Our latest rate schedule is included on the following page.

Thank you for the opportunity to offer our services. If you have any questions, you can reach me at [email protected], or 562.623.5081.

Sincerely,
Jillian Brickey
Director, JLHA
John L. Hunter & Associates, Inc.
6131 0rangethorpe Ave, Suite 300, Buena Park, CA 90620 156
Standard Rate Schedule
Principal 5220/hour
Director 5195/hour
ProgramManager S195/hour
StaffEngineer S195/hour
ProjectManager S185/hour
Assistant Project Manager S165 / hour
ProjectEngineer S165/hour
Senior Compliance Specialist 5145 / hour
Compliance Specialist II 5135 / hour
Project Analyst II 5135 / hour
Compliance Specialist I 5125 / hour
Project Analyst I S125 / hour
Administrative Assistant, Laborer (OSHA 40hr certified) 585 / hour State Certified Laboratory Analysis Cost + 5%
Legal Consultation, Court Appearances/Document review, etc. S290 / hour Subcontractedequipment Cost+5%
JLHA does not add charges for overhead items such as administrative copying or mileage in and around the city. 2 I
157
Attachment B
AmendmentNo. 1 to
Contmct No. 2020-53-CC
AMENDMKNTN0.1TOCONTRACTNo.cyOunmrhcunuffi
SERV[CES OF THE INDUSTR1ALWA8TE PROGRATht AND FAT, OIL,AJ'm 'Caa',uT' CONTROL PROGRAM HETffi,F,N THE aTY OF SOUTH GATE AND JOHN L. mn'ffERANn ASSO('tAJ?':R, lNr
This Amendment No.l to Commct No.2020-53-CC for Management Services of the mdustrial Waste Pm@am and Fat, Oil and Grease Contml Pragpm ("Aigmment") is made and entered into on June 27, 2023, by and between the City of South Gate, a miuiicipal corporafion ('City'), and John L. Hunter mid Associates, Inc. ('Consultant'). The City and Consultant are sometimes hereinderindividuallyto asa 'Party' mid collective]y as '?arties."

RECITALS
WHERRAS,on Jiy 14,2020,theCity Council appmval ContNo. 2020-53-CC mth Consultant ("A@"eement')forManagernentServicesofthe lndustrialWastePmgmmandFat,Oil, and Grease Contml Pmg forathree-yearterm thmugh and including June 30, 2023, with an annual sum of Fifly Four Thousand Four Hundrai Thirty Five Dollars ($54435) and a tohil nggibgah, uuL to cxc ur One Hundred Sixty Three Thoumnd Three Hundred Five Dollam ($163,305); and
$eCityandCtdesiretomecutethisAmendmentsNo.1 toexmnd
Pmfessional ServicesfortheManagementSen4oesoftheIn4ustm WastePmgmmand Fat, Oil and Grease Contml Pmgmm foranadditionalone-yeartamughand includingJune 30,2024, andincrmsecompensationforanamountnottri wrrrdFiflySiiThuusandSeyenHundredStxty Dollars ($56,760) for F Yar 2023a024. The total ag@egate of tj'ie A@eement, and Amenarnent No. 1 is a total sum of Tvo Hundmd hen'ffl Thoamnd 8 Ftve Dollars (3ffl,065).
alW, l'jikRkboRK, THF, PARffi!G' RKRRRY A.GRF.K M FOLLOW8:

TF,RM nV AGRJ'ffl.

The term of the A@eement is herby extended fimm June 30, 2023, thmugh and including June 30, 2024, inclusive.

2. COMPENSA'nON.

Thetotal amountofcompenmion paid by the Ctty to Consultant forthisA@eementshall not-to-e3cml the sum ofF$ Six Thoumnd Seven Hundrai Sixty Dollars ($56,760).

The total sum ofthe A@eement and AmendmentNo. 1, is atotal sum ofTwo Hundred Twenty Thousand Shty Ftve Dollars ($220,065).

Page I of2
158
ArnendmentNo. ] to
ContmctNo. 2020-53-CC
3i
Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and condions of Agreement as originallyappmvedonJtdy 14,2020shdlremaininfiillforoeandeffect Furthemiore,City reservestherightto au@nentorreduoethescopeofwork asthe Citydeems necessmy. All aipitalized te used but not defined in diis Amendmeni shall have the same meanings dributedtothem intheA@eetnent
JN OF,Pmtmbambaveams@dd*AmmdmadNa ltobeexemdedand
aUestedbytheirmspedmoffimrstbeteutdoQm
aTY OF 80UTHGATE:

MariaDel PilarAvalos,Mayor
696//2603
YOdit City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

F. Salinas, CityAttomey
JOHN L. AND ATfQ, TN("-
Dated: '31iblts
Pap2of'2
159
@JLHA

MUNICIPAL CONTRACTOR
January 10, 2023
Arturo Cervantes
City of South Gate
8650 California Ave.

South Gate, CA 90280
Subject: Extension of Professional Seniices for the Management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control
Dear Arturo Cervantes:

We atJohn L. Hunter and Associates (jLHA) welcome the opportunityto continue offering our professional consulting services to the City of South Gate with regard to the environmental programs of Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control.

Option 1: One-Year Extension
The timeframe of this extension is for a period of one year (July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024). Our existing scope ofwork with the City, and Standard Rate Schedule included on the following page will apply for the service extension. It is anticipated that funding in the amount of 556,760 will be needed to assist the City forthis period. Workwill be conducted on a time and materials basis. We will provide consultant services not to exceed the budgetary amount without the City's prior authorization.

Option 2: Two-Year Extension
The timeframe of this extension is for a period of two years (July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2025). Our existing scope of work with the City, and Standard Rate Schedule included on the following page will apply for the service extension. It is anticipated thatfunding in the amount of S113,520 will be needed to assistthe City for this period. Work will be conducted on a time and materials basis. We will provide consultant services not to exceed the budgetary amount without the City's prior authorization.

Thank you again for the opportunity to offer our services. If you have any questions you can reach me Jillian Brickey at [email protected], or 562.676.5703.

Sincerely,
t'6'
Jillian Brickey
Director
(O
160
Standard Rate Schedule
Principal
Director
Program Manager
Staff E'ngineer
Project Manager
Assistant Project Manager
Project Engineer
Compliance Specialist II
Project Analyst II
Compliance Specialist I
Project Analyst I
Administrative Assistant, Laborer
State Certified Laboratory Analysis
Legal Consultation, Court Appearances/Document review, etc.

Subcontracted equipment
Fee Schedule effective as ofJuly 1, 2022
5210 / hour
S185 / hour
!>185 / hour
S185 / hour
S175 / hour
S160 / hour
S160 / hour
S130 / hour
S130 / hour
S120 / hour
5120 / hour
S80 / hour
COSi + 5%
5275 / hour
Cost + 5%
Estimated Costs
Two options are provided: The first is for an extension of one (1) year and the second is for an extension of two (2) years. This project will be on a time and materials basis. We will provide consultant services not to exceed the budgetary amount without the City's prior authorization.

Option 1: Not-To-Exceed Cost Estimate for One (1) Year Extension !
m4 o :i(i
X;ml
:rJ:A!"!
Management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control 956,760 a(ira _ota o ear4;,,;,++i;"fi"m3;7g4'7ptt-%7:.'j_-§i2";z !M Option 2: Not-To-Exceed Cost Estimate for Two (2) Year Extension Management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control S56,760 956,760 2 161
Attachment C Contract No. 2020-53-CC

AGREEMENT FOR PROFSSIONAL SERVICES

FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE PROGRAM AND FAT, OIL, AND GREASE CONTROL PRO(.R AM BETiVEEN THE
CITY OF SOUTH GATE AND JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

This Agreement for Professional Services for the management of tlie Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program ("Agreement"), is made and entered into on July 14, 2020, by and between the City of South Gate, a municipal corporation ("City"), and John L.

Hunter and Associates, Inc., a California corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

RECIT ALS
WHEREAS, City desires to retain Consultant for as-needed professional services for the management of the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease Control Program; and WHEREAS, Consultant warrants to City that it has the requisite skills, knowledge, qualifications, manpower and expertise to perform properly and timely the professional services under this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, based on such representation, City desires to contract with Consultant to performthe services described inthe Scope of Work attachedhereto as Exhibit "A" and made apart to tliis Agreement.

NOW, THERF,FORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. SCOPE OF WORK. City hereby engages Consultant, and Consultant accepts such engagement, to perform the services set forth in the Scope of Work as described in Exhibit "A." The Scope of Work may be mutually amended from time to time by both Parties in writing.

2. COMPENSATION. ThetotalarnountofcompensationforthisAgreementshallnotexceed the annual sum of Fifty Four Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Five Dollars ($54,435), and the three-year sum shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty Three Thousand Three Hundred Five Dollars ($163,305), as described in Exhibit "A." City shall pay Consultant for its professional services rendered and reasonable costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred unless first approved by the Director of Public Works.

2.1 Consultant shall be required to attend meetings at City Hall as necessary in t}ie delivery of the projects. Travel time between the Consultant's office and City Hall Page I of 10
IA
162
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
shall not be billable; however, mileage is an allowable charge reimbursable at the federal rate. Consultant may request an exemption on a case by case basis.

2.2 Consultant shall submit to City a monthly invoice for services rendered included in Exhibit"A." City shallpaythe Consultantwithinforty-five (45) days ofreceiptofthe lnVOICe.

2.3 No payment made hereunder by City to Consultant, other than the final payment, shall be construed as an acceptance by Cityof anywork ormaterials, nor as evidence of satisfactory performance by Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement.

TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement is effective as of July 14, 2020, and will remain in effect through and including June 30, 2023, unless otherwise expressly extended and agreed to by both Parties in writing, or terminated by either Party as provided herein.

CITY AGENT. The Director of the Public Works Department, for the purposes of this Agreement, is the agent for the City. Whenever approval or authorization is required, Consultant understands thatthe Director ofthe Public Works Departmenthas the authorityto provide that approval or authorization.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in any real property located within City which may be affected bythe services to be performed by Consultantunderthis Agreement.

Consultant further represents that inperformance ofthis Agreement, no person having such interest shall be employed by it. Within ten (10) days, Consultant agrees that it will immediatelynotify City of any other conflict of interestthat may exist or develop duringthe term of this Agreement.

5.I Consultant represents that no City employee or official has a material financial interest in the Consultant's business. Duringthe term ofthis Agreementand/or being awardedthis Agreement, Consultantshallnotoffer, encourage oracceptanyfinancial interest in the Consultant's business or in this Agreement by City employee or official.

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

6.1 TerminationforConvenience.TheCitymayterminatethisAgreementatanytime without cause by giving fifteen (15) days written notice to Consultant of such termination and spec3f5ring the effective date thereof. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents and other materials shall, at the option of City, become its

13 163
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
property. IfthisAgreementisterminatedbyCityasprovidedherein,Consultantwill be paid a total amount equal to its outstanding fees for senices rendered as of the terminationdate. Innoeventshalltheamountpayableuponterminationexceedthe total maximum compensation provided for in this Agreement.

6.2 Termination for Cause.

6.2.1 The City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement in any of the following circumstances:
a. If Consultant failsto perform the services required bythis Agreement within the time specified herein or any authorized extension thereof', or
b. If Consultant fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement or so fails to makeprogress asto endangerperformance of this Agreement in accordance with its terms, and in either of these circumstances does not correct such failure withinaperiod often (10) days (or such longer period as City may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from City specifying such failure.

6.2.2 In the event City terminates this Agreement in whole or in part as provided above in Subsection 6.2.1, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may deem appropriate, setvices similar to those terminated.

6.2.3 ffthisAgreementistemninatedasprovidedaboveinSubsection6.2.l,City may require Consultantto provide all finished or unfinished dociunents, data, studies, drawirtgs, maps, photographs, reports, films, charts, sketches, computation, surveys, models, or other similar documentation prepared by Consultant. Upon such termination, Consultantshall be paid an amount equal to the value of the work performed. In ascertaining the value of the work performed up to the date oftermination, consideration shall be given to both completed workand work in progress, to complete andincomplete drawings, and to other documents whether delivered to City or in possession of Consultant, and to authorized reirnbursement expenses.

6.2.4 If, after notice of termination of the Agreement under the provisions of Subsection 6.2.1 above, it is determined, for any reason, that Consultant was not in default, or that the default was excusable, then the rights and obligations ofthe Parties shall be the same as ifthe notice oftermination had been issued pursuant to Subsection 6.1 above.

6.3 Non-Assignability. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this

)\'l
164
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
Agreement without the express prior written consent of City.

6.4 Npn-Discriminahon.

6.4.1 Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, creed, gender, gender identity (including gender expression), color, religion, ancestty, sexual orientation, riational origin, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, or veterarffrnilitary stahis, inthe performance ofits services andduties pursuant to this Agreement and will comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the Federal, State, and County and City governments. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees aretreated during emplo3mientwithoutregard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, national origin, disabled or age.

Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that all employment practices, including those of any subcontractors retained by Corisultant to perform services under this Agreement, are free from such discrimination.

Such employment practices include but are not limited to hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, recruitment advertising, layoff, termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

6.4.2 TheprovisionsofSubsection6.4.1aboveshallbeincludedinallsolicitations or advertisements placed by or on behalf of Consultant for personnel to perfomn any services under this Agreement. City shall have access to all documents, data and records of Consultant aiid its subcontractors for purposes of determining compliance withthe equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination provisions of this Section, and all applicable provisionsofExecutiveOrderNo. ll246whichisincorporatedhereinbythis reference. A copy of Executive Order No. 11246 (relating to federal restrictions against discriminatory practices) is available for review and on file with the City Clerk's Office.

6.5 Insurance. Consultant shall submit to City certificates indicating compliance with the following minimum insurance requirements no less than one (l) day prior to beginning of performance under this Agreement:

6.5.1 Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by law. Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarlyto provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees.

6.5.2 Comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance protecting

165
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
Consultantin amounts notlessthan $1,000,000 forpersonal injuryto anyone person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of one occurrence, and $500,000 for property damages or a combined single limit of $1,000,000, with an aggregate of $2,000,000. Each such policy of insurance shall:
a. Be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted or authorized to do business in the State of California or which is approved in writing by City. b. Name and list as additional insured City, its officers and employees.

C. Specify its acts as primary insurance.
d.
e.

Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy shall not be canceled except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City of such cancellation or material change."
Cover the operations of Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

6.6 Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and/or any other City agency, including otheremployees, officers and representatives, for/from any and all claims or actions of any kind asserted against City and/or any other City agency arising out of Consultant's (including Consultant's employees, representatives, products and subcontractors) negligent perfon'nance under this Agreement, excepting only such claims or actions which may arise out of sole or active negligence of City and/orany other City agency, or anythird parties not acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the control of Consultant.

6.7 Compliance With Applicable Law. Consultant and City shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the federal, state, county and city governments, without regard to conflict of law principles.

6.8 Independent Contractor. This Agreement is by and between City and Consultant and is not intended, nor shall it be construed, to create the relationship of agency, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture or association, as between City and Consultant.

6.8.1. Consultant shall be an independent contractor and shall have no power to incur any debt or obligation for or on behalf of City. Neither City nor any of its officers or employees shall have any control over the conduct of Consultant, or any of Consultant's employees, except as herein set forth, and Consultant expressly warrants not to, at any time or in any maru'ier represent

Ik
166
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
that it, or any of its agents, servants or employees are in any manner employees of City, it being distinctly understood that Consultant is and shall at all times remain to City a wholly independent contractor and Consultant's obligations to City are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement.

6.8.2. Indemnification of CalPERS Determination- In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractorof Consultantproviding services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competentjurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for CalPERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment ofanypenalties and interest on such contributions, whichwould otherwise be the responsibility of City.

6.9 Consultant's Personnel.

6.9.1 AllservicesrequiredunderthisAgreementwillbeperformedbyConsultant, or under Consultant's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits and licenses required by State and local lawto perfomi such services, including, without limitation, a City of South Gate business license as required by the South Gate Municipal Code.

6.9.2 Consultantshallbesolelyresponsibleforthesatisfactoryworkperformance of all personnel engaged in performing services required by this Agreement, and compliance with all reasonable performance standards established by City.

6.9.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractor's wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security.

6.9.4 Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and all other related entities, officers, employees, andrepresentatives, from any liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature arising from alleged violations of personnel practices, or of any acts or omissions by Consultant in connection with the work performed arising from this Agreement.

6.10 Copyright. Noreports,mapsorotherdocurnentsproducedinwholeorinpartunder this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Consultant.

167
Contract No. 2020-53-CC

6.11 Legal Construction.

6.11.1 This Agreement is made and entered into in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced and govemed under the laws of the State of Califomia, without regard to conflict of law principles.

6.11.2 This Agreement shall be construed without regard to the identity of the persons who drafted its various provisions. Each and every provision of tliis Agreement shall be construed as though each of the parties participated equally in the drafting of the same, and any rule of constniction that a document is to be construed against the drafting party shall not be applicable to this Agreement.

6.11.3 The article and section, captions and headings herein have been inserted for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of interpretation or construction.

6.11.4 Wbenever in this Agreement the context may so require, the masculine gender shall be deemed to refer to and include the feminine and neuter, and the singular shall refer to and include the plural.

6.12 FinalPaymentAcceptanceConstitutesRelease. TheacceptancebyConsultantof the final paymentmade underthis Agreement shall operate as and be arelease of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, furnished or relating to Consultant's work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City's check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check.

However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, arelease of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents for the accuracy and competency of the information provided and/or work performed; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the workprepared by Consultant, its employees, subcontractors and agents.

6.13 Corrections. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during City's review of Consultant's report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in areasonably timely manner, such correction shall be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to the Consultant.

6.14 Files. All files of Consultant pertaining to City shall be and remain the property of City. Consultantwill controlthe physical location ofsuch files during the termof this Agreement and shall be entitled to retain copies of such files upontermination ofthis

168
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
Agreement.

6.15 Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by a Party to insist upon the performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other Party, irrespective of the length oftime for which such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's rightto demand compliance by such other Party inthe future. No waiver by a Party of a default or breach ofthe other Party shall be effective or binding upon such a Party unless made in writing by such Party, and no such waiver shall be implied from any omissions by a Party to take any action with respect to such default or breach. No express written waiver of a specified default or breach shall affect any other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach and/or period of time specified. All ofthe remedies permittedor availableto a Party under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, shall be cumulative and altemative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right of remedy.

6.16 Mitigation of Damages. In all such sihiations arising out of this Agreement, the Parties shall attempt to avoid arid minimize the damages resulting from the conduct of the other Party.

6.17 Severability. If any provision in this Agreement is held by a coiut of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in anyway.

6.18 Attorney=s Fees. The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attorney's fees arising outofand/orconnectedwiththe negotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and allmatters arising out ofor connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any Party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that Party or those Parties may be entitled.

6.19 Entire Agreement and Amendments. This Agreement constitutes the whole agreement between City and Consultant, and neither Paity has made any representahons to the other except as expressly contained herein. Neither Party, in executing or performing this Agreement, is relying upon any statement or information not contained in this Agreement. Any changes or modifications to this Agreement must be made in writing and appropriately executed by both City and Consultant.

6.20 Notices. Any notice required to be given hereunder shall be deemed to have been given by depositing said notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and

l'l
169
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
addressed as follows:

TO CITY:

City of South Gate
Arturo Cervantes
Director of Public Works
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 9Q280
TO CONSULTANT:

John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc.

John L. Hunter, President
6131 0rangethorpe Avenue, #300
Buena Park, CA 90620
WITH COURTESY COPY TO:

City of South Gate
Carmen Avalos
City Clerk
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280

6.21 Warranty of Authorized Signatories. Each ofthe signatories hereto warrants and represents thathe or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign.

6.22 Consultation With Attorney. Consultant warrants and represents that it has consulted with an attorney or knowingly and voluntarily decided to forgo such a consultation.

6.23 Interpretation Against Drafting Party. City and Consultant agree that they have cooperated in the review and drafting ofthis Agreement. Accordingly, inthe event of any ambiguity, neitherPartymay claim that the interpretation ofthisAgreementshall be constnied against either Party solely because that Party drafted all or a portion of this Agreement, or the clause at issue.

6.24 Counterparts. ThisAgreementmaybeexecutedincounterpartsandassoexecuted shall constihite an agreement which shall be binding upon all Parties herein. [Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]

170
Contract No. 2020-53-CC
IN WITNF,SS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

ATTEST:

Bar: C g.,
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVE AS TO FORM:

F. Salinas, City Attorney
CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

Maria Davila, Mayor
Dated: 5? " 2-7 - 2-ez51
JOHN L. HUNTER AND ASS
INC.:

Dated:

171
Attachment D
May 14, 2020
City Clerk's Office
Attn: Arturo Cervantes, P.E,
Assistantaty Manager/DlrectorofPubllcWorks
City oFSouth Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA90280
SualECT: ProposalforAs-NeededServlcesforthelndustrlalWastePro@amandFat,Oil,andGrease (FOG) Central PfOlram €Pr@Jet PJlll!11bi :lu4Ala 'OOGI) John L Hunter & Associates, Inc.QLHA) is pteased to submit a proposal to provide for As:Needed Seniices for the Industrial Waste Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease (FOG) Control Program, prepared in response to the City of South Gate Request for Proposal (RFP) Project Number 1041620-0061.

JLHA is an environmental consulting firm that specializes in sendcing municipal clients. Currently we implement elements of Industrial Waste and FOG Control compliance programs to over 20 agencies In the Counties of Los Angeles and Orange. Specific qualifications and experience are detailed in the enclosed packaged.

All staff operate out of JLHA's office at 6131 0rangethorpe Ave, Sulte 300,in 8uena Park, California.

The person authorized as the point oF contact for a contract resulting from the RFP Is:

Michelle Staffleld, Project Manager
310.593.1288
[email protected]
This propogl Is considered valid for a period of ninety (9€Q days from the date of submittal, All information submitted with the proposal is considered true and corred.

Wewelcorne the opportunity to offerourservlces. Please do not hesltateto contact us ifyou have any questions or would like further information.

Sincerely,
(7,L& 'j}
Michelle Staffleld
6131 0RANGETHORPE AVE SUITE 300 I BUENA PARK, CA 90620 I (562) 802-7880 I wwwjlha.net GENERAL ENGINEERING LICENSE A-582340 I HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE REMEDIATION uC. 3382 172
stiBMlll'ao
As Needed Services for the Industrial Waste
Program and Fat, Oil, and Grease (FOG) Control

SERVICES PROPOSAL
2020.05.14
Prepared far: The City of South Gate
Attention: Arturo Cervantes, P.E.

Preparedby: JohnLHunter&Associates
6131 0rangethorpe Ave #300
Buena Park, CA9D620
Michelle StaffiaLd
JLHA Project Manager
[email protected]
J,p![4J,
John Hunter
JLHA Principal in Charge
[email protected] 31D.344.B650
'2,3
173
As Needad Services for the IW Program and FOG Control May 14, 2020 Table of Contents
I. Qualifications, Relevant Experience and References A. Relevant Firm Experience
B. Firm Quality Assurance/Control
C. Staffing Capablltty and Current Work Load
D. Proposed T
E. References
B.
1 I
2 2
2 4
5 6
6 6
6 6
6 II, Scope of Work and Project
A. Conductlng Industrial Waste inspections at new and existing businesses Enforclng City Municipal Code
Evaluating and Processing IW Reports
Reviewing and Approving Developer Plans..,..............................

Conducting Inspections for new deve(opments and existlng Completing and submitting required regulatory
Asslsting with Annual Billings
Developing an informative model that educates the 7 Attending a mlnlmum of three local City/Community event.............................,,....,,.,.,....,........,..,,.7 J, Quarterly Inspections and Results............................................................... 7 legal Investigation History
Consultant Agreement...

Fee
7 8
8 9
7 6
A. 2020 Rate Schedule
B, Estimated Not-to-Exceed Fee Proposal
Appendix A. Resumes ............................,,Al
Appendix B. Samples of Inspection Form and Outreach Bl Pace
174
As Needed Services forthelW Program and FOG Cantro! May 14, 2020 I. Q,ua]ifications, Relevant Experience and References John L. Hunter and Associates, Inc. (JLHA) is an environmental consutting corporation founded in 1985.

We specialfxe in assisting municipalities implement water quality and consenation programs. These programs include NPDES, stormwater pollution preventlon, watershed management, sewer overflow prevention, Industrlal waste (IW) and fats, oll and grease (FOG) control,water conservation, and recycling.

Services provided include program administration, funding assistance, compliance planning, engineering, inspedions, educaUon, and monitoring and reporting.

A. Relevant Firm Expertence
This section highlights JLHA's recent experience relevant to this proposal. Table 1 Is a complete list of IW/FOG services we recently or currently provide to municipal clients. This indudes:

Table 1: S mmarr of IW/FOG !iervlce; Recertly orCurren':ly Provided Client
a'IJ.
e
!!
:%a
m
' %"
. E- .
.!!l
'!
.111
kl}
!8
E
ll
>
'O
(!
E
J
E
{!
.tlll
'e
eL
n
. ! .
,5I
ffl
4s!;e).!d
%&t
_j!el
44 &lu
.E
u
a
ui
!)!.

R
4 a
'(5
!E
(l)l
>,
o
50 E
€
ffl.
at
i
5 'al
l!
€ i
J
A
z
-{! '
' Bo
.11 j
,':

WE
e! '
_e 9t,)(l_
.lla
(
a
.p
b
!I
?
(J
Arcadia 1995 25 x X x x x x x x
Covina 2015 s x x
EI Monte 2016 4 x x X x
Hamhorne 2008 12 x x x x x x
Inglewaod 2015 3 x X x
Lynwaod 2014 s x x x x x
Manhattan Beach 2010 10 x x x x
Rancho Palos Verdes 2010 10 x x x x x x x
Signal Hill FIB5 35 x x x x x x x x
Sauth El Nkinte 1997 23 x x x x x x
South Gate 1991 ;ig x x x X x X x x
South Pagdena 2010 s x x x K x x
Slanton 2007 13 x x x x x x x x
Whittier
TOTALSoutd!4qenda ,
2015 5
ffl m
x
u
x
.13
x
:u 5 a
l-
3 x
g
P;iHel-
175
As Needed Services for the IW Program and FOG Control May 14, 20X) JLHA has been provldlng IW and FOG Control services to municipal clients since its incorporation in 1985.

Prior to the State Water Board's 2006 Waste Discharge Requirements Order for Sanitary Sewer Systems (555 WDR), FOG control was addressed under the broad scope of a City's IW Control Program, which was adopted to protect local sewersystems. Since 2006, JLHA has expanded the FOG element ofits IW ControJ Programs to address the 555 WDR, including Food Service Establishment permitUng, FOG-oriented tnspections and aducation, hot spot identification and facility prloritization.

B. FirmQualityAssurance/ControlProcedures
Service quality is ensured through a QA/QC budget assigned to the program. This budget (approximately 5% of total program costs) is for time spent by supervlslng key personnel to regularly review the ProJect Team's work produd. This time is also used to track and control the budget, and to ensure control of the schedule of services provided as listed in the followlng subsections.

It is worth noting that twoJLHA FOG clients in the LA area-South Pasadena and Manhattan Beach-have received Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) program audits by the Los Angeles Regional Water Board. These audits address all elements of an 555 WDR Enrollee's SSMP Program, indudlng FOG control source, In both Instances no deficiencies were noted in the FOG Control Program.

C. StaffingCapabilityandCurrentWorkLoad
JLHA staffing is at 25, consisting of 20 full-time staff and 5 part-Ume staff, This includes I principal, 2 directors, 5 projectmanagers, 5 engineers, 7 field inspectors, 4 project analysts, and 3 administrative staff.

All staff operate out ofJLHA's office at 6131 0rangethorpe Ave, Suite 300, in Buena Park, California. The ProjectTeam listed in the follomng sectlonwill be available to provide any requested servlces throughout the term.

D. Proposed Team
Table 2 lists the proposed team for these programs and their typical projed roles. See the Resumes Section for the experience, credentials, and education of the projed team, Pagti2
176
As Needed Senices for the IW Program and FOG Control
Table2.lW/FOG ControlStaffRoles
May 14, 2020
Program Title Team Memt er Information
E
fl
e
8 Project Manager/
Project Engineer
Name Mkhelle Staffleld, PE, MSE, CPSWa Q5D
Roles Point-of-contact, project admlnlstration and delivery Warkload 8% of servlces provided
Principal in Charge/
Project Engineer
Name John Hunter, PE
Workload Point-of<ontact, project oversight
Roles 2% ofservices provided
Asst Project Mgr./
Compliance Inspector
Name Hugo Garcia, CPSWQ, CESSWI, QSD/P
Rokis
Alternate polnt-of-contact, preliminary plan revlew, project delm=ry, and field services admlnistratlon
Workload 25% of services provided
E
m
,!
N
C
!
Senior Engineer
Name Rosallma Tandoc, PE
Roles Plan review and approval
%rkload 1% ofservices provided
Program Manager
Name Cameron McCullough, MS, CPSWQ, QSD/P, IGPToR
Roles As-needed project oversight and support
Workload 2% ofservices provided
Outreach Specialist
Name Jaaluellne Mak
Roles Outreach programs imp!ementation
Workload 2% ofservices provided
Compliance Inspector
Name Erick Barrales
Roles Field compliance inspections
Workload 45% of services provided
Compliance Inspector
Name Elsa Chan
Roles Field compliance Inspections
workload ' 15% of services provided
Page3
2"1 177
As Needed Semces for tha IW Program and FOG Control Mac 14, 2020 E. References
Table 3 is a listof client references,Additlonal references are available at the request ofthe City.

Table 3: Referenais
Agency Name Data Field Reference Information JLHA Project Manager Arcadia Contact7ntle Vanessa Hevener, Environmental 5enices Officer Cameron McCu!lough, John Hunter
Address 11800 Goldring Rd, Arcadia, 910%
Phone/email (626) 305-5327, [email protected]
JLHAservicas IW/FOG Control
Monterey Park Contad7ntle MarkMcAvoy, PublicWorks Director/OtyEngineer Carneron McCullough, Address 320 W Newman Ave, Monterey Park, CA 91754
Phone/email (626) 307-1323, [email protected] JLHAsenices IW/FOG Control
Signal Hill Contact/T Itle Ke)II Tunnicliff, Director of PubllcWorks Michelle Staffleld Address 2175 Cherry Ave, Signal Hlll, CA 90755
Phone/email 1562) 989-7351, [email protected] jLHA services IW/FOG Control
South EI Monte Contact/litle ReneSalas, DiredorofPublicWorks Cameron McCullough, IlugoCiarcia
Address 1415 Santa Anita Ave, South El Monte, 0191733 Phone/email (626} 579-6540, [email protected]
JLHA sentces IW/FOG Control
Stanton Contact/ntle Allan Rlgg, DirectorofPublicWorks Cameron McCullough, Ilugo Ciarda
Address 7800 KatellaAve, Stantan, CA 90680
Phone/small (714) 890-4204, [email protected]
JLHA services FOG Control
PhBe4
178
As Needed Semces farthe IW Program and FOG Control May 14, 2020 II. ScopeofWorkandProjectUnderstandmg
JLHA welcomes the opportunity to continue providing professional Industrial Waste and FOG Control services to the City of South Gate. This section details the approach to the Scope of Work (SOW). The timeframe of this proposal is for three years (Fiscal Year 2020-2021 through 2022-2023). The services provided may be extended for additional years, maximum of two, upon written agreement by the City and JLHA. This proposal is considered valid for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of submittal, Services offered under this proposal are:

Conducting Industrial Waste inspedions on commercial and Industdal businesses Enforcing City Municipal Code Chapter 6.62 - Industrial Waste Evaluating and processing IW Reports to ensure compliance Reviewing and approving developer plans
Conducting inspections for new developments and existing businesses Completing and submitting required regulatory reports Assisting with Annual Billing
Implementing Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QC) Procedures Developing an informative model that educates the public Attending a minimum ofthree loca) City/Community events to promote the program Quarterly inspections and results update
PageS
179
As Needed Services for the IW Program and FOG Contro! May 14, 2020 A. Conducting Industrial Waste inspecttons at new and existing businesses There are approximately 250 existing Industrial Waste Discharge Permits that require compliance Inspections to verify proper control of industrlal waste discharges to the City's sanitary sewer system.

JLHAwlll insped these Facilities on a tiered schedule assethy the adopted LA County Municipal CodeTitle 20 sectlon, These compliance Inspectlons focus on employee education as well as verlficaUon of proper source control BMPs and grease trap/interceptor maintenance.

B. Enforcing City Municipal Code
The City's Municipal Code, Chapter 6,62 Industrial Waste, which was adopted In part from DMslon 2 (Sanitary Sewers and Industrial Waste) of Title 20 (Utilities) ofthe Los Angeles County Code will continue to be enforced.

C. EvaluatingandProcessinglWReports
An inspection reportforthe Industrial Waste and FOG Control Program has been developed and currently in use. A copy of the report is provided to the businesscontad upon Inspection. Reports are evaluated for compllance, filed and logged onto an e(ectronic database for recordkeeplng.

D. ReviewingandApprovingDeveloperP1ans
When new IW dischargers, orexisting IW dischargers undergoing extensive modification, submit plans to the Bulldlng Department, the plans are reviewed for compliance with the City's grease trap/interceptor requirements. The application and any associated plans and supporting information are reviewed for:

Discharge rates into the sewer;
Pretreatment retention times and capadty; and
Types of materials being discharged.

This work is managed by the Proposed Team's Principal In Charge. A plan review's turnaround time is within two weeks.

E. Conducting Inspections for new developments and existing Existing facilities are Inspected based on the tiered schedule as set by the adopted LA County Municipal Code Title 20 section. New developments are not inspected until the ficllity has received their Certificate of Occupancy and has been operating for at least three months. Sites found not to be In compliance recetve a follow-up two weeks afterthe Jnitial inspection to allow for necessary corredions.

F. Completing and submitting required regulatoty reports JLHA will complete and submit required regulatory reports to the State. This includes the results of SSMP self-audits as they pertain tothe City's FOG Control Program, and FOG investigations conducted as a result of Category I sanltary sewer overflows.

G. Assisting wtth Annual Blllings
JLHA will continue to assist the Finance Department mth Annual Billing by providing a spreadsheet of the sltes inspeded withln the fiscal year and their assigned tiered schedule.

Page6
180
As Needed Services for the IW Program and FOG Control May 14, 2020 H. Developinganinformativemodelthateducatesthepublic
Thls task consists of providing relevant Industrial Waste and FOG information to each facility enrolled in the Industrial Waste and FOG Control Program. The materials could be distributed at the aty's permit counter or by JLHA's inspedors durlng an inspedion. Such information includes a kitchen BMP poster, sanitary sewer system general brochure, and blank maintenance log forms for FSE staff to complete on a regular basis, Examples ofthese materials are included in Appendix B.

1. AttendingaminimumofthreelocalCity/Communttyevent
JLHA is avai)ableto attend a minimum ofthree local/community events forthepromoUon ofthe Industrial Waste and FOG Control Programs. JLHA currenttyattends at least one eventyearly to promote the NPDES environmental program and is available to present both topics during the same event.

J. Quarterly inspections and Results
Inspection results and non-compliant information can be provided to the Public Works Department on a quahedy basis. This will include: the Issued Industrial waste permit, permit expiration date, number of inspections required and conducted annually, violaUons, pald fees, new businesses Identified (annually), and an electronic copyofthe inspection.

III. Legal Investtgation History
JLHA has not been the subjectof any legal investigation by County, State, and/or Federal agencies within the past five years.

IV. ConsultantAgreement
JLHA has no exceptions requested to the standard contract induded in the RFP.

P,'r(,a7
181
AsNSarvksforthelWProgramand FOBControl May 14, 2020
V. Fee Proposal
jk 2020 Rate Schedule
Pnrdpal S195 / hour
DireCtOr 6175 / hour
Program Manager 5175 / hour
Staff Engineer 6175 / hour
Project Manager 6165 / hour
Assistant Project Manager 9155 / hour
Project Engineer 6iss / hour
Compliance Specialist II S125 / hour
Project Analyst II 6125 / hour
Industrial/commercial facility inspedion S125 / unit
Compliance Specialist I 6115 / hour
ProjectAnalystl 6115 / hour
Administrative Assistant, Laborer (OSHA 40hr certifled) 675 / hour State Certified Laboratory Analysis Cost + 5%
Legal Consultation, Court Appearances/Document review, etc. 6250 / hour Subcontrade4 equipment Cost + 5%
This rate schedule is subjectto consumer price index (CPQ ingeases in subsequent years.

P a ge8
182
As Needed Serv!cas ror the IW Program and FOG Control May 14, 2020 B. Estimated Not-to-Exceed Fee Proposal
The annual not-to-exceed costs forthe Industrial Waste and FOG Control services are included in Table 4.

Work will be conducted on a time and materials basis. Information on the tasks listed are provided under the Scope of Work section of this proposal.

Table 4. Estimated Not-to-Exceed Annual Costs for IV//FOG Servlces Task name Team' Rate Hours Cost Totals
Conduct approximately 355 inspections for 250
Ficilities CSI 5115 344 539,560 SS0,970
Enforce ordinance tn cases of noncompliance CSi S115 25 5z,grs Process permits CSI S115 50 55,750
Conduct plan reviews PE 5155 15 52,325
ASSISt with Annual Billing CSI SIIS 4 S460
Participate in 3 City/community event(s) to pnomote
the Industrtal Waste and FOG Control Program
CSI S115 o SO
Adminlster Program and Implement QA/QC
Procedures (assume 5% of sub-pro@ram costs)
PM 5165 21 53,465 S3,465
Total S54,435
* CSI: Compllance Specialist 1/2, PE: Project Engineer, PM: Project Manager Page9
183
As Needm Services forthe IW Program and FOG Cantml May.l4,E20 AppendixA. Resumes
The following sedion indudes the resumes and certlficaUons of key personnel, PaHeJll
184
As Needed Services for the IW Program and FOG Control Educatlon
M.S., Civil Engineering, Loyola Marymount
a.s., Ecology, Behavior, & Evolution, UCSD
Certificat]ons
PE, Californla Professional Civil Engineer
CPSWQ, Envirocert (#1136)
QSD, CASCA (#26529)
May 14, 2020
Michel}e Staffield, PE, MSE, (.PSWQ, QSD
Water ResourcesEngineer
Michelle Staffleld has thirteen years of experience in the water quality field, speclalizing in surface water quality regulation in local regions including Los Angeles, Orange County, and San Diego, Her experiences Include
managingthe development and implementation of polnt and non-point source programs-induding NPDES and
TMDL programs for municipalities-assisting and
training municipal staff in their In-house NPDES
programs, and represenUng client Interests in
interadions with regulators and other stakeholders.

Recent Expedence and Pmject Qualfflcatlons
Michelle serves as a ProJect Manager and technical lead on various stormwater infrastructure projects for munlcipalities Involving planning, review, and implementation. In this role her relevant experiences and tasks include implementing and managing NPDES municipal permit provisions such as watershed management and TMDL compliance, Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Low Impact Development (LID) for planning and land development, construction, and industrial/commercial activitles, public Information and participation, and general programs management and technical asslstance, She is also involved in the development and review of Watershed and Stormwater Management Programs, Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs), and LID Plans,
Munk;ipal NPDES Permit Management: Some of Mlchelle's current client-specific responsibilities include:
* ReviewingLIDPlansfollomngthestandardsoftheLosAngelesCountyarea-wideMS4Permitfor the C1tleS Of COViria, Diamond Bar, DOWney, Hawaiian Gardensi Long BeaCh, L7nWOOd, Monterey Park, Norwalk, Pasadena, Rancho Palos Verdes, Santa Fe Springs, Signal Hill, South El Monte, South Gate, West Hollywood, and Whittier,
s Reviewing WQMPs following the standards of the North Orange County area-wide MS4 Permit for the citIes of Buena Park, La Habra, Placentla, Seal Beach, Stanton, and Villa Park. (WQMPs are the Orange County-equivalent of Los Angeles County's LID Plans.) * Servlng as point-of<ontad with projed engineers for the LID Plan and WQMP review process. a Conducting post-construdion BMP verification and maintenance inspections for the cities of Covlna, Diamond Bar, Downey, Hawaiian Gardens, La Habra, Placentia, Rancho Palos Verdes, Seal Beach, Signal Hill, Stanton, and West Hollywood.
* Assisting in municipal TMDL compliance activitms, including the preparation of Trash TMDL studies and compliance reports, and Baderia TMDL studies and Load Reduction Strategy reports. h Assisting in NPDES program management for the cities of Downey, South Gate and Signal Hill.

Tasks include serving as a point-of-contactwith City staff, representing clty Interests atwatershed meetings and other related meetings and hearings, and preparing the Indiv}dual Annual Report.

Watershe;d Management: Through representation of municipal clients' stakeholder interests, Mlchelle also participates In the development and implementation of watershed management programs and monitorlng programs for the Los Cerritos Channel, Lower Los Angeles River, and Lower San GabrTel River.

PageA2
185
As Needed Services for the IW Program and FOG Caritrol May 14, 2020 John L. Hunter, PE
Principal
Eduatlon Mr. Hunter SeNeS aS tbe Prlncipal OfJLHA. He %aS OVer30 s.s. Chemical Engineertng, CSULB years ofexperience in municipal environmentl programs B-S- Bk)10glCal SCienC5# UCI and currently overseas: (1) elements or over 40 separate CarUficatlons and ucenses NPDES PROGRAMS encompa!!lng three counties that CA ProFesslonal Chemlcal tnglneer, 4724 covers programs such as: watershed and stormwater CA Reglstered Environmental MS5SOrl 0900 management, TMDL implementation, plan reviews, o Hazar"us subs'ance Remova'i U3a2 industrial and constructlon inspections, public agency QGene' Englneerlng ucensa' A-58234o activities, public outreach, and monitoring/reporting; (2) eleven munidpal FOG programs encompassing
permitting, Inspections and enforcement; (3) seven munidpal Used Oil Recydingprograms; (4) three munldpal BeverageContainerRecyclingprograms;and(5}twowaterconsenationprograms, AsofMay20l6Mr.Hunter serves as the chair for the LA Permit Group, which provides area-wide MS4 Permit updates to all affeaed parties under the LA Region MS4 Permit.

Related Expedence
Water4h@d Management
lead consultant for the Lower Los Angeles River Watershed Group, the Lower San Gabriel River Watershed Group, the Peninsula Cities Watershed Group, and the Long Beach Near-shore watersheds. Oversaw preparation and oversees continued development of the Watershed Management Programs farthese groups.

Also participates in the Upper LosAngeles RiverWatershed Group, the Dominguez Channel Watershed Group, and the Los Cenitos Channel Watershed Group.

Total Maximum Dally Loads
Los Angeles RwerMetals TMDL: Developed the Reach 1 Metals TMDL Implementation Plan on behalf of nlne local agencies. The Plan was used as a source document for the Compllance Schedule In the Lower LA Rtver WMP.

LosAngelesRiverTrash TMDL: Administered Trash DGR studies and associated compliancerepoits for multiple citles since 2004. Negotiated client interests with Reglonal Board staff. Obtained grant funding for and prepared the Hamilton Bowl BMP Study. The study eva(uated different end-of-pipe trash capture systems for the Citles ofSlgnal Hlll and Long Beach,
MS4 Permit Minimum (:orltrol Measures (M(,Ms)
Oversees MCM elements of MS4 Permits for 37 dtles. MCM programs Indude buslnas and construction site inspections, LID Plan and SWPPP reviews, BMP implementation for public agency activiUes, illicit discharge investigatlons, and public outreach.

Representation and advocacy
Represents cllent Interests in meetings with Regional Board staff/members regarding(E)WMPs, TMDLs, and other Permit mandates. Has chaired the Los Angeles River Watershed Management Committee, Santa Monica Bay Bacterial TMDLJ7 Subcommittee, and the LA Permit Group. CurrenRly senies as technical lead for the Lower San Gabriel, Lower Los Angeles, and Peninsula Cities Watershed Management Groups. pageA3
186
As Needed Services for the IW Program and FOG Control May 14, 2020 16years of project expermnce
Education
M.S., Applied Mathematics, CSULB
e.s., Physics, CSULB
Certlfiations
CPSWQ, Envirocert (#0842)
QSD/QSP, CASQA (#22706)
IGP Trainerof Record, CASQA (#079)
Cameron McCullough, MS, CPS%VQ, QSD/P, IGP ToR
Director
Cameron McCullaugh has sixteen years of experience In the envlronmental compllance field, specializing in water quality.

His experience includes munfcTpal NPDES, TMDL, and 550 Control program administration, pmgram funding, compliance planning, providing technical assistance and training to municipal staff, and representing client tnterests in interactions with regulators and other stakeholders.Afflliatlons Phi Beta Kappa Society
Society for Industrial & Applied Math Recant experlence and projact qualHiaitions Mr. McCullough serves as a munlcipal NPDES and Industrial Waste Program Manager for several local cities. Programs administered include those for NPDES stormwater permits (MS4, IGP, and CGp), non-stormwater permits and orders (e.g., sanitary sewer overflows and drinking water system discharges), and local ordinances related to these permits and orders. Tasks Include fundlng (e.g., Safe, aean Water Program), compliance planning (e.g,, Water Management Programs and TMDLs), stormwater quality controls for development and construction, industrlal facilities, and munlclpal activRies, prohibiting and investigating non-stormwater discharges to and from the MS4, and surface water quality monitoring. Through providing these services, he has developed the qualifications needed to sene as a Program Managerfor this proved, Specific examples of these qualifications include:

Serving as a Program Manager for contracted MS4 NPDES Program services for local cities: Arcadia, 8urbank, Diamond Bar, Glendale, Inglewood, San Gabriel, South El Monte, South Pasadena, Stanton, Villa Park, and West Covina, Project responsibllitles include serving as point-of-contact, overseeing the Project Team, ensuring successful completion of the proJed, and representing clients In mteractions with regulators and stakeholders. Estimated total budget: 9650,000 peryear. s Serving as a Program Manager for contracted Industrial Waste and/or Fats, Oils, and Grease (FOG) seniices for loca* cltles: Arcadia, Hawthorne, South EI Monte, South Pasadena, Stanton, and Whittier. Project responsibilities include serving as point-of-contact, overseeing the Project Team, ensuring successful completion of the project, and representing clients in interadions with regulators and stakeholders. Estimated total budget: S200,000 peryear, Representing cities in MS4 NPDES Permit compliance audits from Cal EPA and Federal EPA: Villa Park 2019, Diamond Bar 2019, Stanton 2014, 2010, Seal Beach 2010, 2006, Big Bear Lake 2007.

Developing projects and submitting applications for Safe, Clean Water Program funding: South Pasadena 2019, Burbank 2020, Diamond Bar 2020, Estimated budget: SIO0,000.

Administering the preparation of watershed management programs to address wet and dry weatherTMDLs for Metals, Toxics, Bacteria, and Trash: Lower Los Angeles River, Lower San Gabriel River, and Long Beach Nearshore Watersheds, 2013-2016. Estimated budget: 61.5 million. a Administeringtheadaptivemanagementofwatershedmanagementprograms:LoWerLOSAngeles River, Lower San Gabriel River, and Long Beach Nearshore Watersheds, 2017-2020. Estimated budget: SIO0,000.
s Leadinghundredsofmuniclpaltrainlngsesslonsforover30municipalitiesoverthelastl5years.

PageA4
31 187
As Needed Services For the IW Program and FOG Control May 14, X120 Education
B.S,, Environmental Sclence, UCR
Certtflcatlons and Training
CPSWQ, EnvinoCert (#1183)
CESSWI, EnvlroCert (#4769)
QSO/P, CASQA t#27064)
Professlonal Certiflcate tn GIS
Basic InspectorAcademy, Cal EPA
Spanish fluency
Hugo Garcia, CPS%VQ, CHSSWI, QSD/P
SenkhrProJectAna%st/AssistantProjectManager
Hugo Gareia has eight years of experience with John L Hunter & Assodates, speciallxing In NPDES and Industrlal Waste/FOG Control re@ilations. His experiences include implementation of Munldpal NPDES Programs for Industrial/Commercla( FadlRies, Development Construction, Municipal Activities, Planning and Land Davelopment, Public Information and Participation, and 11ncit Connections & Illicit Discharge Elimination Programs. In addition, Hugo providesTMDL Implementation and reporting, and serves as JLHA's lead GIS Spec}allst.

Recent Experience and Project Quallficatlons
Mr. Garcia currently serves as both a Senlor Project Analyst and Compliance 5peciamt whose responsibilities indude pravldlng assistance with the implementation or several Watershed Management Programs in los Angeles and Orange County, as well as conduding storrnwater compliance inspections (e.g., La Habra, South Gate, and Whittier}. Specific examples of recent experience and project qualifications include:
* Assisting with the development, Implementation, and compliance reporting components of Trash TMDLS for the aties of Alhambra, Arcadia, Burbank, Downey, Glendale, Inglewood, Long Beach, Lomita, Lynwood, Monterey Park, Paramount, Pasadena, Plco Rhiera, Rancho PalosVerdes, Signal Hill, South EI Monte, South Gate, South Pasadena, Temple City, and West Hollywoad. * Ass1stlngwlththedevelopmentoftheLowerLosAngelesRiverWatershedManagementGroupTrash Monitoring Reporting Plan (TMRP), Trash Minimum Frequency of Assessment and Collection (MFAC/BMP) Programs for the Cities of Arcadla, 8urbank, Downey, Glendale, Long Beach, Pasadena, and Pico Rhiera, and Plastic Pellet Management Programs (PMRPs) for the atlas ofArcadia, Burbank, Glendale, Monterey Park, Pasadena, San Gabriel, South El Monte, South Pasadena, and Temple City. * Assisting with Industrial General NPDES Stormwater Permit compliance activities and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs} for municlpal facillUes located in the aties of Laguna Beach, La Mlrada, San Gabriel, Signal Hill, and West Covina.
* Conducting over 3,000 NPDES compliance Inspections at Industrial/commercial ficilities (e,g,, food facilities, automotive repair facilities, and facllltles subject to the Industrial General Permit) and construction sites.
* Developing and malntainlng GIS databases or 1) potential sites for low Impact development (LID) retrofit projeds to comply with various Watershed Management Programs, 2) catch basin retrofit locations to complywlth Trash TMDLi and the statewideTrash Provisions, and 3) MS4outfall and non- stormwater discharges locations to comply mth Coordinated Integrated Monitoring Programs (CIMPS).
* Reviewing preliminary plumbing plans for new development and tenant improvement proJeds at Industrial Waste/FOG facilities in the citles of Arcadla, Signal Hill, South EI Monte, South Gate, and Stanton.
h AssistingmththerevlewofsmallsiteLowlmpactDevelopment(LID)plansfarconforrnancewithcity- specific LID standards for the Cities of Signal Hill, South Gate, and West Hollywood. * Developlng retrofit oppartunlty Inventories for multi-watershed/mult!4urisdictional grants (i.e. OCTA ECPTier 1, Prop84).

PageAS
188
As Needed Services for the IW Program and FOG Control May 14, 2020 Overview
Rosalinda Tandoc, PE
StaffCivil Engineer
Ms. Tandoc has over 30 years of experience reviewlng and approving structural and architectural plans, Her specialty lies in reviewing and approving such plans for compliance with Permits (lncluding MS4, City ordinances (including LID and Green Streets/Fats, Oils, and Grease/Industrial Waste/Eroslon Control), Building Codes, and other State Laws, At JLHA, she has been instrumental in expediting plan review and approval for issuance of permits, interading with clients to troubleshoot project development problems, and expediently facilitating completion of cllent projects. She has done this for all of jLHA's past and current clients, which now includes 23 cities.

Educatlon
Master of Science In Civil Engineering
California Store Unfversiffl, Long Beach
Related Experience
Certificatons and Llcenses
CA Registered Clvil Engineer
Wlth jLHA
(Starting 2006 )
s Revlews structural and architectural plans and raidential and large and complicated buildings for compliance with the MS4 Permit, atyOrdlnances and State Law.
s Interacts with developers to facilitate completion of thelr projects s Worked with the Prlncipal in investigating problems presented to them. s Code Consultant
Prior Expedence: a Los Angeles County Department of Public Works Building and Safety Division (1979 - 2006)
ii Coordinated wlth local agencies In expediting the issuance of permits a Assisted Permit Technician In solving problems that he or she may have incurred In the processing of permits and other related problems that need to be resolved at the counter.

Assisted the City In developing ways and methods of expeditlngthe processing of plans for issuance of permits.
s Assisted the City In developing plans and methods for effective office organization in the City Building Department In working with the City Planning Department,
Personal Advancement Courses
Engineering Management
Communication
Diversity Training
Business and English Wdtings
Supervisory Management
AchJevements/VolunteerWorks
Outstanding Woman of 1998, City of Cerritos
Greater Long Beach Girl Scout Council
Cerritos Senior Center, City of Cerritos
St. Linus Parish, Nonualk, CA
Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, Los Angeles
PageA6
189
As Needed Strvices for the IW Program and FOG Controt May 14, 2020 Appeqdix B. Samples of Inspection Form and Outreach Material Thefollowingsection includessamples ofaninspectionform andeducationalmatertal handedoutmthe public.

P.iBaBl
Llb
190
a!a,.--' atyOfSOuthGatelndustrlalWastePrOgritn-FoodServlCeEs'fflbllShnlents(FSEs) '; j
%rmlt Number: Inspectlon Date:

FSE Name: Inspector: i
Address: Inspedar Slgnat'ure:

Contaa Name/Tiile:
04ECKuST FOR BMP COMPuANa 181CnONS
Raqdremant Stltll$ Comments/Comctlve Actlm Requb"ad

1. keens Instalfed In all fkxir and slnk
drains? % € NO €
2, Propersegegatlon and aillectlon of
waite axiklngoll? Yes CI NO €

3. 0$osal ofall hxid waste In the trash
(notdmn the draln)? Yes a No Cl

4. Oil dacanted from kitchen exhaust
filterwashwaterto agreaselnterceptor
orwaste oil contalner?
Yes a No a
S. Requked kitchen slgnage posted? Yes [1 NO €

6. Employee BMPTralnlng Log complete
and up-to-date? % [] NO €
7, Grease Interceptor Malntenance Log
complete and up-to-date (lfappllaible}? Yes € No [:l

8. Foodgrlndersellminated? Yes € NO [:l

9. Blataglaigchemlcal additives used for
emuls)fylng grease efimlmted? Yes [] No []

10. Effluent dlsdiarge temperahires
below 140" Fahrenheit? '14!S [] NO €

11. Yelkiw Grease Pldiup/Disposal Log
complete and up-to-date? Yes 0 NO Cl
€JECKLIST FOR(-REASEtNT!RCEPTORIN9ECnONS
12, Interceptor accessible for
Inspectkin? Yes a No [:)

13. FOG and solids layerkss than 25%
oftotaldepth? Yes a No Cl

14. Discharge (effluent} line
unabshucted? Yes € NO [:)

15. aaffie tube present and working
properly? Yas [] No a
I IN!!IEalONFINDINGS/CORRECnVEACTION€S)REQUIRED:

CORRECnVE ACTION NmlCE (IF REQulR!D)
Ifany defldendH h@w, %en cmcked abQvQ @r Irony eorrectivQ actlons hiVQ bqeri Qatm, then based On the Inspectkin ofyour establishment, you are in noncarnpllance with the Sanitary Sewms and Imustrial Waste Ordinance 4Munl6pal Code Chapter 6.62). Your attbllshment must take Immediate actlon to oonect the problem by implementing the requlrm corrective acUon(s) by:

Correcthre Aemn Due Date
Aharthls date, the Inspedarwill re-inspactyourestabl}shment to wlfy that all neaissary conadhie measures have bean taken. FAllURITO IMPLEMENTTHE CORREalVE A(TION(S) MAYSU!UECTYOu TO MlSDEMFJkNOR OR INFRACnON PENALTIES.

ACKNOWLEDGEMWOF RECEIPTOF € ORRECm/E ACnON NOnCE
FoodSemcaEnabl)shmerRContact51xrvtura PrlntedName Date 191
DOinstall agreasetrapand keepitclean.

Thereshouldmonlytheslightestlayerof
greaseontheoutletside. C(eanasneeded.

Morefquentdean outswill reducethe odors
assocaited withgreasetrap.

DOrgyclewastegreasewlthrendering
companles. Goto
www.caffog.org/Hauler.html forhauler
reference.

DOscrapegreaseoffdishes&potsintoa
trash an before washlng.
i
DOn'tcleanhoodfilbrs Inthe sinkUsea
commercialservke instead.Some enterprlslng
restaurateurs haveeven taken theirdirty
greasehoods to theself-servecarwashes to
be deaned.

DOntusehotwatertowashgreasedown
the disposal.Grease liquefies in hmwaterand
hardens oncereaching thecold waterin the
ThaDnoonoi'is'opo0wunrgarneyaoserasins.

Recycle Waste Grease
Don't LetThis Happen
Vlslt www.caffag.org
Clt}OfSOuth Gaffl
Departmentof Public Worki
For more information, pleasecall
(323) 357-9657
www.cltyofsouthgate.org
Q

GREASE-FREE
SEWER

A RESTAURANT GUIDE

TO HELP PREVENT SEWER STOPPAGES
192
Te!A\.S:IEAD{NGICAUSEOFII
-SEWERSNP,PAGESfSGREASE
jyy'p4t@grS!
environment as well.

Most gre:ise Is a bypradud of food prepara-
tlon such as:
- Cookingoll
- MeatfatS
- Dairyproducts
- Bakinggoods
h Butter & margarlne
- Shortening
* Sauces
- Foad scraps
- Lard
OncettAgewerrsa(mastblodied,thsiuntieatediewmlihas

WHAT ARETHE EFFECTS OF
SEWER BLOCKAGE?
On your business
- Potential contad with disease-causing
organisms.
- Sewageandfoodpanldesthataccumulate
whlleyaursewerpipes back upcan
attract insects and othervermln.
- Propertydamageresultlngfromsewer
blockage orback ups witl lead to
expenslve plumbing repairs and dean up.
o Violationsofthehealthcodemlghtlead
to closure ofyour buslness.
- Severefinestoyoufromregulatory
agencies*
On the environment
* Clogged sewers result In overflows.
- Sewage overflow may get onto city
streets, and then flow Into storm drains
which lead to our riversand beaches.
- Healthriskstomrmmersandmarlnelife
an cause beach closures.

On the city
Increased sewer blockages lead to costly
maintenance.

Increased sewerfees!
(Q,.)FINES
.=ptrsaqiarics
IrBeepcal,ioresead ckiwn until the blockage Is
2aeliableforthecostofthecleanup.
3pBreospue:,jecdtafomrathge,costofanyresulting
expenslve- both in effonsfor
remediation and from possible fines.

The costcan add upveryqulck51!
193
\"\"';IA/ que pueda tiacer
-toaque no debe hacer
Puede ins(alar unatrimpadsgrasay
mantenerla llmpia. El lado desallda tlene que
teneruna capa nifnlma degrasa.

MantengasvFimpa Umpb comoseanecsario.
trampadegmsa.

Debe de reciclar losreslduosdegrasa.
para obtener una liiia y lnformad6n de
empresmquecolectan grasay aceite porfavor
vlsite el sltiodelntemet
www.calfog.org/Hauler.html
Puede despegar lagmsa,comida,etc.que
qusda en los p)atos yollai. Ponga los residigis
en el botede basura.

No debe dellmplarlosfiltrosdela
campana en el fregadero sl no esTh coneaado
aunatmmpadegrasa. Lhillceunsaniicki
comerclal en su lugar.Algunos propietarlos de
restaumntesTnduso han llevado los filims a
un lavado de auto senildo para Ilmpiarlot
No debedeusaraguaaillenteparalavarla
grasa en el kegadero. La grasa sedemte en agua
callenteyse endurece una vez que Ilega al agua
fdaen las ca/larfas.

ThNodebetirargrasaso, aceltes en cualquier
desagae.

Recicl6 desechos de grasa
No deje que esto ocurra
1llm+n iiiiiii.iaiiilruH-ui H
Ciudad de South Gate
Departamento deTrabajos POblicos
Para mis lnformacl6n porfivor
Ilame al (323) 357-9657
www.cttyofsouthgate.org
fist f
CANEmAS
LMBRES DJE fiRASA

UNA GUIA DE RESTAURANTES
PAaA EVffAR €NlSTRU((10NB EN LAS CAfl[RIAS
Dasinolpor JahnLHuntai&Auodats201l
194
solo p'ueden'causardafi6s }nteriores en la
proptedadsi no tambl6n art;enazanal medio
ambiente.

LIaapmreapyaofflrraa.d0enldaegararlsmaeenst.iiOns bsuibesprcoodmuodo de - Aceite para coclnar
. Los productos licteos
- Manvquilla ymargarina
- Sobrasde comida
- Grasas de carnes
- PastelerFa
a Salsas
- Manteca
' Con demasiada'frecuincia los, aceites y
grasas se Introducenal slstema de plomerfa
a trav6s de frega4etosiydesagaesde plso en
las fiteas de preparacl6n de alimentos. La
grasa se pegaal intetffir de las tuberlas, y
cqn el tiempo7a ;3rasa Opuedeacumulary
,@i4:'bloquearel tubo entii6.

La mayoria de,obstmcdones an lascaflerfas
,o<unencuando'm,grasasseacum0l@n en
2CUALES SON LOS EFECTOS DE
BLOQUEAR LAS CANERIAS?
En su negocio:
- Poslble contacto can organismos que
causan enfermedades.
- Cuandosuslineasdeplomerlasetapan,
reslduos ypartrculas de comida se
acumulanyatmen Insectosyotrosbichos
que pueden crear potenclales rlesgos a su
salud.

Cuando las I!neas setapan el costo de
lirnpieza y reparaci6n puede ser muy alto.

Lasvlolaclones al C6dlgo deSalud puede
resultarhasta en la dausura de su negodo.

Puede ser multado porautoridades
reguladoras.

A el medio ambiente:

Las cafierias tapadas resultan en derrames.

Estosderrames pueden dirigirse hacia las calles
de la cludad, yfluyen hacia las alcantarillas de
agua pluvlal que son descargadas a nuestros
rfosyplayas.

Riesgosde salud delos bafilstasy la vida
marina puedeausarel derre de playas.

A la ciudad
El aumento de carierias tapadas y derrames
pueden oasionaraltosy excesivoscostos de
mantenlmiento.

Podrfa aumentr los impuestosdesistema de
carier!a.
1b5eioaqcu:,nadohastaqueserepareel
2iSimeapri:spaonsable porel costo de la
3dSeaanosuaJelatoppor0prleeldcaods.todecualquler
demimes pueden sercostosos - tanto
en los esfuerzosde remediaci6n yde
poslbles multas. IEI costo aumenta
muyripidamente!
195
Manatjng
,[1)[ano
"lt'S (aSler ttlan Y[lll Ttiink!"
La Fnrma Inaorreeta
D + ncl pot r ccok nq
iciidbc d icclli)
itilu l'ic Ji im
Ho v ail i taiit'luoi da
rocin'ii if rclimit ii
e n e I d c s 'l t) ri c
Do i ol dHgii
ol jood v'iile iiilo Ilu
i) ith iga diip..u'il
No ( 011(I s dcipiiid ciui dc
(@al)id i oii Ill liilunuJii uu
cnmid i
DJ not pour iainli i.
diiiicllq inl.i Iho dniri
Hu ptint)i dcipiidicir %
ICLIIC dn:<timiiniii on n
des iquc
Do not i-iiil jlooi
mili Vll(I(11 vilii s II
run nll dmicllyl inlo
Iho iloim diiin
Ho tivo Lipclci do liiio eii i.n
lut)'it donda iil igpi ctiin
h ici i al dgiii,ric
THE
RfflGHT WAY
la Farma Gorreeta
WIIIO (-cii pms ird
vaiili ire n piioi to
y'iili nq
Li ipiii ctin iirn !o'ill I i
I s i o I I s s c s u c I Th s 4
itii n dc I i'i ila inlcr
tin l'iviiloi
Ditpcii oj lood
v'nlc ditcClh4 m o
It L li 'iili
Dguidiii m
d u s p ii r dl C Ill! d 0 e or+ld s
iin cl bole dr biiun
Crllocl V 1111} C
ird ilote {or I(!LIICIIII(l
Junlo Ll di.tpcialicio r'c
ic a t o i) il u i K olo p i i s
quu u i iccicltdo
Clc in i tli intidg
ivct 'i 1111111! tmk
Lmpio loi l'ipc!ci da
pno delta dc iin l'rvqba
o IIIICI I(OT
q'G=
196
Office of the
SOuth Gate City Clerk Item No. 7
JUN 1 9 2024
FILED Ciffl of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL
/'2"" ACENJDA B,JILL
DepartmentDirector:

SUBJECT: AMENDMENT N0. 4 TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC WITH BKF ENGINEERS, INC., FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CITYWIDE

RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE I, II, III AND IV, CITY PROJECT NOS. 659-ST AND 699-ST
PURPOSE: To approve Amendment No. 4 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC ("Amendment No. 4") with BKF Engineers to fund additional design and construction support services that were provided for the Residential Resurfacing Project, Phases I, II, III and IV (RRP Project), which construction is now complete.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: The City Council will consider:
a. Approving Amendment No. 4 with BKF Engineers, Inc., for additional design and construction support services for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I, II, III and IV, City Project Nos. 659-ST and 699-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed $116,230; and
b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 4 in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. Amendment No. 4 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC is in the amount of $116,230 and is proposed to be funded from the Gas Tax funds as sumtnarized below.

Contract No.
2021-147-CC

RRP PH I
SBI

RRP PH II
SBI

RRP PH III / SW

PH VIII, SBI

RRP PH IV,
SBI Gas Tax
Water PH II
& III, Water Total
Contract $68,790 $68,790 $137,578 $275,158
Amendment No. 1 $7,973 $7,973 $7,973 $239,641 $194,720 $458,280 Amendment No. 2 $79,677 $79,677
Amendment No. 3 $87,416 $87,416
Amendment No. 4 $7,550 $7,550 $7,550 $46,790 $46,790 $116,230 Total $84,313 $84,313 $153,101 $286,431 $213,883 $194,720 $1,016,761 ANALYSIS: On November 23, 2021, the City Council approved under Contract No. 2021-147- CC ("Agreement") with BKF Engineers, hic. ("BKF") for Professional Services to provide construction support services on the RRP Phase I, II and III Project (RRP Project), for which construction of the project is now complete. During construction, a number of needs arose that required additional construction support services and design services from BKF. BKF was authorized by the Department of Public Works to proceed to provide the services so as not to I
197
delay construction, which on a construction contract of this magnitude, $7.8 Million, delays would be costly. The additional services included project management ($9,720), and additional construction support to resolve existing thin pavement issues ($12,930). Ai'nendment No. 4 includes $22,650 to fund these services for the RRP Project.

Under Agreement BKF is also responsible for preparing design and construction documents.

This project is currently in the design phase. BKF was authorized to complete additional work to revised the scope of work of the project. The Engineering Division found that there was a need to upgrade existing flatworks such as sidewalk, curb/gutter, and ADA curb ramps. The additional services include project management ($3,450), field surveying ($9,992), finalizing bid packages ($69,722), and construction support ($10,416). In addition, as the engineer of record, BKF must provide construction support services for construction such as handling Requests for Information and submittal reviews. The Agreement did not include the concrete flatwork design service.

Amendment No. 4 includes $93,580 to fund these services for the RRP Project.

Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement is in the amount of $116,230. These fees are reasonable and competitive as they align with the services approved for similar street improvements under the contract.

BACKGROUND: The 5-year Capital Improvement Program provides funding annually for street and water system improvements on residential streets under the following annual projects:
(a) Citywide Residential Resurfacing (RRP) Project, (b) Citywide Sidewalk Improvements (Sidewalk Improvements) Project, and (c) Water Main Replacement (Water Improvements) Project. Several phases of these projects were consolidated to (a) ensure that both the road pavement and sidewalk issues are addressed at the same time, (b) minimize disruption to residents and motorists on the same street that would otherwise be caused by having more than two independent construction projects, (c) provide for efficiency in project management, and (d) encourage more competitive costs. BKF was contracted to perfon'n design and construction documents and to provide construction support on the project.

On November 23, 2021, the City Council awarded the Agreement to BKF in the amount of $275,158 to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the RRP, Phase I, II and III and Sidewalk Improvements, Phase VIII.

On July 26, 2022, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $458,280 to add services to prepare design and construction documents for street improvements to be included under the RRP, Phase IV Project. Amendment No. 1 also added services for certain water system improvements to be included under the Water Main Replacement, Phase II and Phase III Project.

On June 27, 2023, the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement in the amount of $79,677 to add engineering services to prepare design and construction documents to rehabilitate Southern Avenue and Frontage Road East from approximately 250 feet east of Garfield Avenue to Miller Way.

On August 22, 2023, the City Council approved Ainendment No. 3 to the Agreement in the amount of $79,677 to add engineering services to include water improvements under RRP, Phase IV as well as to provide additional construction support services under RRP, Phases I, II and III. 2 198
Amendment No. 4 is now necessary to add services to include flatworks improvements such as sidewalk, curb/gutter, and ADA ramps under RRP, Phase IV as well as to provide additional construction support services under RRP, Phases I, II and III.

Phase IV stree:s within the Residential Resurfacing Proiect as follows:

SEGMENT STREET FROM TO
1 Santa Ana Avenue Seville Avenue Madison Avenue
2 Liberty Boulevard Long Beach Boulevard Califomia Avenue 3 Madison Avenue Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
4 Deeble Street Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
5 Victoria Avenue Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
6 Missouri Avenue State Street California Avenue
7 Mariposa Lane City Limit Sequoia Drive
8 Elizabeth Avenue City Limit Tweedy Boulevard
9 Virginia Avenue City Limit Tweedy Boulevard
10 Adella Avenue Southern Avenue Legacy Lane
Construction for the RRP, Phases I, II and III began on March 1, 2023, and was completed on May 10, 2024.

Design of the RRP, Phase IV Project is scheduled to be completed in July 2024. Construction is estimated to take eight months to complete.

ATT ACHMENTS: A. Proposed Amendment No. 4
B. Amendment No. 3
C. Amendment No. 2
D. Amendment No. 1
E. ContractNo. 2021-147-CC
F, Location Map
KT:lc
199
Attachment A Amendment No. 4
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
AMENDMENT N0. 4 TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC WITH BKF ENGINEERS, INC., FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE

CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE I TO IV, CITY PROJECT NOS. 659-ST AND 699-ST
This Amendment No. 4 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC ("Amendment No. 3") for the preparation of additional design and construction documents for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I to IV, City Project Nos. 659-ST and 699-ST (the "Residential Resurfacing Project"), is made and entered into on September 26, 2023, by and between the City of South Gate ("City"), and BKF Engineers, Inc. ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021, the City Council approved Contract No. 2021-147- CC with Consultant ("Agreement"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I, II and III, City Project No. 662-ST and the Citywide Sidewalk Improvement, Phase VIII, City Project No. 683-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars ($275,158);
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2022, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement ("Amendment No. 1"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST and the Water Main Replacement Project Phase II and Phase III, City Project No. 702-ST, in an amount not-to- exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollars ($458,281); WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023 the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement ("Amendment No. 2"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST for Frontage Road East Street improvement, in an amount not-to-exceed Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($79,677);
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023 the City Council approved Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement ("Amendment No. 3"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST for Frontage Road East Street improvement, in an amount not-to-exceed Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($79,677);
I
'f 200
Amendment No. 4
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant therefore desire to execute Amendment No. 4 to the Agreement (Amendment No. 4), increasing the compensation payable to the Consultant in an amount not to exceed Ninety Three Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Dollars ($93,580) to fund preparation of additional design and construction flatworks improvement such as sidewalk, curb/gutter, and ADA curb ramps documents Exhibit "A" attached hereto and for construction support for the Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I-IV identified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, rinder the terms and conditions of the Agreement, bringing the aggregate total of the Agreement, Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2, Amendment No. 3, and Amendment No. 4 to One Million Sixteen Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty One Dollars ($1,016,761).

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. MODIFICATION TO AGREEMENT

1.1 SCOPE OF WORK. Consultant shall expand its services to the City as identified in Exhibits "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part to this Agreement. City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.

1.2 COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation paid by the City to Contractor for the work identified in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall not exceed Ninety Three Thousand Five Hundred Eighty Dollars ($93,580).

2. EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and its amendments, attachments, and exhibits thereto, shall remain unchanged in full force and effect. All the recitals to this Amendment No. 4 are incorporated into the Agreement as modified by this Amendment No. 4. Furthermore, City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally]
2 !E) 201
Amendment No. 4
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 4 to be executed and attested by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Gil Hurtado, Mayor
ATTEST: Dated:

BY:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: BKF ENGINEERS, INC.:

BY:

Raul F Salinas, City Attorney
By:

Chris Rideout, PE, Vice President
Dated:
3 202
December 12, 2023
Revised May 28, 2024
Mr. Ken Tang, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Subjed: SOUTH GATE CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT ADDITIONAL SERVICE REQUEST NO 5: PHASES 1, II, AND Ill Dear Ken:

As you requested, BKF Engineers (BKF) is submitting an Additional Service Request to increase the budget for Construction Support. The request also includes revisions of pavement delineations to be included in the contract agreement for design and Construction Support. The scope of work outlined below encompasses Design Support, Project Management, and Construction Support that BKF will provide to the City. i. SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
We are requesting an additional budget for Project Management for additional meetings with the City. This budget request will also cover the day-to-day project management for Phases I, II, and Ill, including monthly invoicing, preparing progress reports, and meeting minutes.

TASK8: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Per the City's request, the pavement delineation needs to be redesigned according to new guidelines and comments provided during a meeting on November 14, 2023. We are requesting an increase in our budget in order to revise the pavement delineation plans for the streets within Phases 1, It and lit.

MEETINGS: We assumed an additional twelve (12) meetings.

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER ESTIMATES: The engineer's Estimate will be revised according to the City of South Gate City Council AGENDA BILL document dated December 13, 2022, and the Bid Schedule document dated October 25, 2023.

CityofSou+h Gafei Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phases l-Ill Additional Service Request No. 5
11Page
1 203
II. COMPENSATION
Below is the fee breakdown, and we propose continuing to invoice in the same manner as the original contract. !!a ar!'l-z ffif

1.0 Project Management $9,720 -

8.0 Construction Support

8.1 Meetings (12 meetings) $11,544

8.3 Construction Engineer's Estimates _ _ -$1,386
mi ffi'!iv_iy_i
F/JIIN
Please contact me at 949-526-8478 if you have any questions regarding the additional scope items or if we need to meet to review them.

Sincerely,

BKF ENGINEERS
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD
Project Manager/Associate Principal
CityofSou+h Gatei Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phases l-Ill Additionol Service Request No. 5
21Page
204
South Gate Phase I Ill
Additional Service Request No. 3
? . i! I €affi!l Ill!'r W'a al
F .. .
i
!.i " ":;' . .. "i" %i. = '
i*:,," '
a- .
;. , ,
{" '
:"l ... .. =ff.a'0__%k!Lm _ttt-tLtal._. (- __ _- ffiJtttml.aLul0a ._ __. .4.tttt ; S..-. _4'..... _____' ..._._.__ !fflHitiut!IJI-11 :&i_H € __ffiaffii
- g' -
2":
,da.EI
Cj 'a:
3i' Y'i"" a: E'
::gtlpl_ ;:; 4
a'.mC)Aniu)a.
- "'- "W "
,.- :O1 :
':8
:_'.q,f _ .-.
', % 'a))l- y
aaF01la.
aA
_ 'Q ..Oj
' .JC -
a....i l'li':la'i!aa'az
"..
- :;, _ ; a;
=J9: -
:."ll',a;,'
:"'MR,_ ;"
01(; -
_ 'a)'! '.a)A '
:aK,"'
:==:taWc-*i-
' "' "- a;'
" L_- :
' :al! n
' . i.a)J " v
. ;al ".
.rCTl ;',
C ...
' . LLI ".. ; 2
= 5 , ;
Q . i
\T. i:JI..I -) .
4J -
.'H ' l%% _. -l
F Aa)ff '*li:..zi41JiR a_4r b
aal':,." " :',' "' " : "
':- ' 0 .-
i ).,. "- .
r __a)..-..
% p 9."'.." a
'-, _= iJ%_' _.1.. . al!l .
=+4,%. l}-Ill.-
4a-''a,
i ) _ j--i',-
i.i,yl%,a,Do. .1" . _
-: " , _ , C:_.
;"" :.t-:. .' - .C1 '
i-." ' . {j,j4k.
":.... ti =. ,.a) a,
, Jj',:0 I
+i<!:ii_io
I .. . : . :. .. . -:;
. :.>ai , :, _
. a). ;, .-
,l:Q _@8
'%T ::'!"Jc )ai;l
'At!lJ_' 2.77
:R ) ACn" ' ,. j:;' k'J
*ima"s.i_:j"'_!!
%_ _-:
14ffll""':!:'-" :.
.l_ ,a,, i,
.# 04-a
% ( - 0
a. -'!;;I""€ :' .
€- '<: "
?4 e'k ash
4":"0'
r'l. *a '
AC'L'aizy
r "' " "..-:
i"J;,l'
a' C .
a)'=
;.C
' tu-. '.
' m .
- !'(1:l.i
' p.;$.='
..- <'ir '
..i .1 ,
' 9
. ,=,J,,.
-' :l .
xaai"(!u.i-_jC
.. - : -N
o o.6 :
- %mQ'
:" i!ll"f
" " : €5
.i!:C -.at-l .
:l -
r*:=-a)."
. ':?:
i:i.a(d;lzlm
r","""- """
" :. . L. 1 ,,,
.: .,;CT)l-" al!:- lJfi;,, ,,c _.-
ff :'5:axq
E_
o
I
-!!l
2_0
k/l
H
o
U
-B
B_C)
l/l
Rate
l--l+'i+vz(
I 'l:j$.

I. '+ -%.-l % . %
P-f
I=lt' I
q 'U7..:R
}J(di 7,,.'-,4a
%I.;'&1. -
I
:7":
(.XeV.1
!'l- 'i fltU"
} laG) l"-' ':'JaaeH
"41;J
)= . I
-.)-iP
-g$a'*iC13
} ')
p.i; l;a;<*-I- L
a anait- N!'al
2f4MW*
'a'az':-; ":"2j':1 I
Task1 Project Management
Project Management
I 1='-:4_:-
:'- - o24'
Jl* 'l'a! = =a-.':&.'
' 46§
L ... M . .
:;, ' (,:k. . '- ,, a
!
a.)q <( ( ' _ s, .a-,, d$% . ' 6,.a a.!
-, - &Th ,. .
.- ffl
.t4a - ' - '
i-%J&.
-ai... "=j7{41,.,,'
[
._ -4WA)tRt&
't!' _+ _" I =:,L'_'_'II40
I
$9,7201
Task 4 Subtotal Hours o 24 16 o o o o o O' I 40 I
Task 4 Subtotal ($) $0 $6,072 $3,648 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $01 $01 $9,720 I Task 8 Construction Support

8.1 Meetings
. 8.2 Construction Plans Revisions
B.3 Construction Engineer's Estimate

8.5 Reimburseables (mileage)
I
,,,,..l .,.....,.,............._..I
48 o
7 $11,544
$0
$1,386
$0
$0
fflT1
t 'l
l
i . .'(":-. -
I " '
it-. -' - ' ;
i - '=;
Ifff-:-"o
m-",2:$ J
::' o o- 4
,, <" 24
' - " '(,( , -.:'A
.'== l'Xj,." es_ ' . " ,. d. ..,."-j.,'i
i
]
ti
t
i-.--k
t
r-
t -'
I.ial'a.
}.. - .' .,
t"-"_':-:
} - -. .._
.- ,.. 's:,
- ,- - ;'. l -
," Ij ,." " " a 7 _ i'A a _ .. ' .
':" " - }" - " a - Oi'
, .., , . . .:
_...:-)=,:' %
' - : , . - '. a
.a , 4s0. ,, y
_ '.!t ,.'
- ,," . '.t!
f: - . -
' - nl
., . . >,

I ( ) A,
' . . - !
.._ll. :la.,11.,,,',i,,
.' : ': .-'!
r'-"J
f':(-'ilB tljaJ::J"J:l
Task 8 Subtotal Hours o -"' 2jl- - 26 o 5 o o o ol I 55 I Task 8 Subtotal ($) $0 $6,072 $5,928 $0 $930 $0 $0 $0 $O I $O I $12,930 l TOTAL
622,650 l
205

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
EXHIBIT "A"

LIST OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS FOR THE CITYWIDE PARKING STUDY Updated Dad
- _ J* IL .w'4' 7-: I" ' "'za' :I=a'J* I" I.:_. _J-" ol 'IP:R"'.!'-!!X-9":'AU"'J!!'9%'!'C""N'a':E"'Pmu_z"""'.._ia"::J5.i".J':-m'4:""""'::;WJg"'!'J"' i.afa:..! r J:
!o.J"J;:_;;,:::YJa=.'lI 'c4Q7a:g:_-;-Jt=i';f;bg':isi. ::W'+i:iiitJ'W:"rh..u-':I.il ,g . S , - - - - ,- =. -- '_l'i-.:(Z = --!. ,, ., - - Fl' 72i :,, Na%4,Ry)53%ndini'P4rkt;pjj_:Th,1-.'ff",:,:.,J,'S=mZ,:1 %9_'l0-.u)!-11- - "7.'=, -l#aaa. * lO .% _l 4_ y, , . . ,.1, ' _ ,..,,aa" i y :.-' -, ,-, 'i h , +i! _ -- " l '- , ' . N 'i %'+_4W.1!;1&_- s:p<o.hibl!JtTh-!p. a.rklnH_oj,ox i
l'i-2':.-'7L'ZZo..:l._". _.,2): I ',l,"'""'Lohll "-l.""'aa"i:;il" \-" ) ::":*:'7T*"a'. 7, "-'! q . 2 '- . 5@%p%atq@ ,'- '..', :
i, y . % _, ,,-, -'a '- '.- _. ..__....__..____-'.1___..___.. __. . . - ,, - - # % # 0 - % Y 0 I # I %. % %. 0 ; A #p. i% % #l Q. @ " ,_ "-i* - ,.."'0 . - " t_)* '-!>'.____-_-+-=-a
. i6imff6ilvehiklas;6ji:iesi%ThtTil'streiti-T.l
. . {. . a - ( = - 1'4"rza _ ., -' i
I
I DESCRIPTION .1
I
Install WayTinding Signage tO Public
Parking Lots
ILimits of pilot program: Long Beach
8oulevaid to Chestnut Avenue and
Santa Ana Street to Llberty Boulevard.

I
Initallatlon oT new bike rack sunounding
patki and shopping centers.

Reduce Red curb zones by the I
1:::;:n"hatlnte'e""s
I
Modlfylng dty ordinance of commercial vehldes
-.----.-.1
I
I " ITASKI .
, , . . _ ,li,
I
,Bldoeunltelvfya,pdubslOicutpha:kIninAgvloetinuoenaTnwd eedy iGarfleld Avenue (Hollydale).

Develop a work plan to identiTy the
locatlon of fire hydrants and the
number af parking spacei loit or
galned.

Identify the parks and shiipping centevi for
new bike racks to be Installed.
l======-=-
Schedule a meeting wlth dty atioiney for
guldance and procedutei in updating city
ordinance.
- :, ' TASK 2 _
Prepare exhlblts and work orders for
ileld operations
Prepare exhiblts and work orders for
field operatlons.

Develop work plan for Improvementi.
l=============-
Schedule public hearlngs.

M
I
Requeit fundlng to Implement work
orders.

Request fundlng to Implement work
orderi
Request Tundlng to Implement work plan.
l=,=====,=-=-
Preient dty ordlnace to city councll.
n
Fisld operationi io Install slgni. Field opeiatlons to Initall slgns.

Construd Improvementi for each park and
ihopping center.
1:::-=-=-==-
ICieate work plan.

TASK5 - i
=l
Prepare outteach 11tetature to promote
public parklng loti.
'Prepare outreach 11teratute to notlfy
the public of the Improvementi along
the flre hydrants.

I
Request fundlng to implement work plan
:, " TASK 6 ' I Request Enforcement from PD Conitruct Impnovements per work plan.

TASK 7 'l Coordlnate enforcement with PD.
.:: TASK8. I
.. - = 'l
TOTAI DLlRA'n5N iWeeks) l] ._ _ _ j
at PW prOieCtl and implementatlon Ivarilon 21 Updated 7/26/2023 206
September 18, 2023
Revised May 30, 2024
Mr. Ken Tang, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Subject: SOUTH GATE CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT ADDITIONAL SERVICE REQUEST NO 4: ADDITIONAL PHASE IV SCOPE OF SERVICES

AND FEES
Dear Ken:

In accordance with your request, BKF Engineers (BKF) is presenting this Additional Service Request to augment the budget for design services related to the "Phase IV" streets within the resurFacing project. The specific segments requiring attention are detailed below and highlighted in orange, as shown in Attachment A.

SEGMENT STREET FROM TO
1 Santa Ana Avenue Seville Avenue Madison Avenue
2 Liberty Boulevard Long Beach Boulevard California Avenue 3 Madison Avenue Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
4 Deeble Street Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
5 Victoria Avenue Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
6 Missouri Avenue State Street California Avenue
7 Mariposa Lane City Limit Sequoia Drive
8 Elizabeth Avenue City Limit Tweedy Boulevard
9 Virginia Avenue City Limit Tweedy Boulevard
10 Adella Avenue Southern Avenue Legacy Lane
BKF acknowledges that the City intends to include the removal and repair of concrete flatwork (including curb & gutters, sidewalks, and driveways) as part of the project's scope of work. This additional service request provides a breakdown of the additional scope required to effectively implement this design changes.

SCOPE OF WORK
TASK1: Project Management
With the additional services the City is including in Phase IV, we are including additional coordination meeting with the City and design team, up to three (3) meetings with the assumption of two (2) hours per meeting.

TASK3: Preliminary Engineering
We are seeking an increased budget to cover the time required for a site visit to identify the areas necessitating CityofSouth Gate i Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phases l-Ill Additional Service Request No. 3
1 Page
207
concrete flatwork removal and replacement (R&R). It is assumed that the City will participate in the site visit to ensure agreement on the areas requiring R&R. This task encompasses a total of three (3) days to complete the site visit for all Phase IV segments.

TASK 4: 50% PS&3 Plan Preparation
95% PS&E Plan Preparation
100% Final/Bid-Ready Plan Prep
We are requesting additional budget to incorporate the concrete flatwork removal and replacement findings, identified during the site visit, into the Project's plans, specifications, and estimates. It is understood that these modifications are exclusively required in the street improvement sheets of the plans, totaling 42 pages.

TASK5: Construction Support
With the additional scope of concrete flatwork, we are requesting to increase the budget for construction support to:
u Review and respond to RFIs
ii Review Contractors submittals and provide comments/approval. ii Prepare as-built drawings for Contractor/City Redlines II. COMPENSATION
Below is the fee breakdown and we propose to continue to invoice in the same manner as the original contract. f s
I
.1 . I ' m
1 Project Management $3,450
3 Preliminary Engineering $9,992
4 50% PS&E Plan Preparation $37,478
95% PS&E Plan Preparation $19,674
100% PS&E Plan Preparation $12,570
5 Construction Support $10,416
' rmim
aaau-t.iy-*-a
yxy;tiai
aifiWmWWINilWfflflllll i ffi
Please contact me at 949-526-8478 if you have any questions regarding the additional scope items or if we need to meet to review them.

Sincerely,

BKF ENGINEERS
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD
Senior Project Manager/Associate Principal
CityofSouth Gate i Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phases l-Ill Additional Service Request No. 3
2iPage
208
Mi"!fflffiatfffiJ 'fflalThWWl
i..7:..z'.' !takla
t }tNlliW&l'Mlmjaama'm":
i.

IJkl_
: _ali'!l
W
'-a 4
$4 .hy- ',
U14
N'!,.. +iir.1-
I !%
i.,,..,.-,-'a"'-- --.:!
i7 !.-
i
tj..;
4%2
l--"'
t.
i"'l.'
,. .}. .
'>.Ji'.
atAW. .'P
' "ffi
!
.!
. fl.'. .ltb
, , j.

O}!fJlgz,
r.
!-
.1!'mk%A
a N -
MoLl'
!N"b;
l'ltJm
., . B .,...., :
'K4ffi
AXJ) ta, +)M
'.;tj.
*'a&;rmi
jji"Q" l,-
u.llt!
-;J91(;j,;5< ' )l.: t
L,..;b,'l
r---'
Th
:,
J 211K41 hpl Hl. I Yl) * re.- (T j-6P El *.* M -'. ill %i 4 ll'j (if }! IA!Wllil41'!!Illl=l4'llli l a a a z z s a a z a a a z s z z z s "Pmaim' "M:n:'eme':'U"7oiimlnntlan Mee0ngi (aiinmm up o 3 m@. 2 hana eaih mlg) !LJ L,_i _,_lfi -i j-- 1)40
Tril t lu}tnil lli liJOO li.i& I!ti In in l) j!O 11.410 af.!lifl4i{lll'fflTffl'NMPffiMlThli I
=-=====-=-! I
t Oi )
-4
:..0
<. i.
}}. . _
i, , !
4,,,:.. 4
IN
in
Tll} ) If}Inttl ll IN IN In IN
K!'@POm?fJ. a a I
-"t
'%'ii a"-14
.iaW
H 1, t i?t .r')'} ",i,'a' )-'
..y4+i -- J=mk-
_ a -a.,i.
...biaitsA
li(.')W'i
!'
,:J
* i l""g
IQ
-!! -l!!tl
In
Itjtl
H
IN
IN
IN
IN
Inhtatrl Ill I( 14.))1 11,101 IR!!I
kf.!'lNo}4#A4J41lUil'MlilAil'll
Riffne PS&! Pi&igi bmd on C$ iwm aT ConiepU9ialimj Iltn I PiepiniTiihnkil5peel!cmoni i
:Voat"it"lm'p:'wm''int'(lii"l'gnrmPlinPiipiiallon 'i[E
1,
aE
' 4
't ' , .1
Hl
,J
II,110
1R2!!
112000

11.110
latrn
!u}vml Ill Il.af 10,011 l!.la I)0.1!( IN W 111 jif 07.on ih41f.l4Jf.lilJilli.lf,fil-II I
Rdne PS&! Pa&tgt bmd an C15 iedew aT 6011 !l&t (ubmljlrl I PryrsTedylalSpseffidom I
aRioj"""niP(&Ea'P:adir"gi ;a+i"'d on Clly ieyiw of to% PSIIF (ubmliUl ai Wttst Impmvrmrrlt 1,
F
E,,.._,-
it'
14 "00
' n . it
i' .1i
'i
_,...........i
1).t4)
tM.Otn

11.41}
I!.ffi
tn
In}nijrl 11) li7Ai I!.!Ill li.!!O Illil IN IN li!.@l 11!.1174 " i - a fl4A'VJfl.!{ldiHi.!i!.lilah I i
Reffni PS&E Pimge biied an Chy ieyew of 9t% PSI!J Inbmljll a Piephie Tichnkil !piafitiUoni
a%o0""niP"tM'P:'b'ge "bm"id on C* imm of 9!% PS&! tubmllThl & Walit Impmremir!' L'_ l
.i
s
.;
al ' . t(
,ffi
'Z , f'.t ' , , ,
(Ill,
ws'
% " '
I
-i
g
1).4t)
1f.{14
14411
1i.114
Ill
lubtnil il} li.O% liAl( li.al0 111.!)O It).tl0
ilM4'ffiffi<al)Cliil'ml'llH'%d'lil I i
Wl Ryew/Reipe
Renew Coniiidar !nbmlbli
Piapini M-Bum Dirmngi fiam Conjiadai/C$ Redllnei ( . " . . ,4
'. i:2
" j
, , ;ft
.1
.l_.,"L_i.
+ ". '
j"', , , , ,l 0
ai
,, , ; ;,
._ib..i
$':,j
!
,,a ,, . . . j
L
7f
i 11
J ;j
-'l -a
l{.l
lult
11 m
11,100
i luhioEI Ill IO It l! 1% l( tiain IO In I( IlO.lT} IT!.li} ITIT
Tnbl Dnlltn In liiJll lil!!! tuin U IN I!l.i!O I!IJ!O
ffi!alffltl: I!l.itO
GRAND i(IIAI tADDmONak lulMY !IIOG!T }tl)ullT AND !HAII 110 I}!.!!t

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Citywide Residnetial Resurkicing Project
Additional Service Request for Phases 1, 11, and Ill, and Phase IV, City Project No. 662-ST

BKF TEAM FEE PROPOSAL
209
South Gate Phase I Ill
Additional Service Request No. 3
:at.'+Jatal!+.m..'sa#_..t6Rl&&t;.WA%'x)aii#iljln#*! haiaaiiiimi-iafaiaxfviiaiaiiixy(lbxx:affifffflff!P%aaiiaxiaxiaai.iaaumbax-aiinaiamwiivmwi.wuiiiiii.uiini.iiiiun nii '-4 FiA-_6. 104 M41ilu 4e )i @h- AjTaal {? I I?.i@ -' N.'. rTa_l. 4FN 'I- A 'Th-i 'l N ifflO I 'i% "41' " 'IMW'.'!'. Nl'aW-da&: a@f'!' € 111-l €la:J eM1r i!!!il €NRffMJ)ifil "'y" '4
, F
} .- '
"l
!" ' " " %-k.
{'
l:"
ip:1&'l'll'Ml&Q..l'jliJi.@.'Ml4141ll'iQ41. i:"Wli"iAYxiiii-l.i. '(-'14"il'J'i.u',i'l.'l'i, fl; I I ml I i." 10. I l'.V 171!W?'aTk!lWjtfflTffill#W%i!T:Uta!!!!!!KlmT!')JW%f €ll i
!
;..

Il
C'
(O
f. ,.

U)
'50. igE
-B. :'O!
,d_u>QEB '
iC- IC :
_ fat: € =
} . l.. , ,
4 <C)i
mLl
.: y _
. $_ ' .
- - a)_IA
" "R5A ' -
'W '
,43
=:(E:
(""
"' CTi}"
:pr _
i. i.i"-' ,
' 2"
:I
L/)-!.
a%.

O1
,5_,,,,
Q 'if a)
..a) .iC)l"
.C 87(1)
a:-"C
Cl) ':_io
5:'it'2,'
' - ' l ' _
. a)f
I . ai -
C"--0
_ .. (a
' C;F
, _, ,;<,, =
a)'; a
a@J '-
, _ a_:
04'.

C- ._
a ' -S' - "
!){ .
, 5%,'.
a '
:)'
l/l a .
=: '% '
,, -:(%
a)A.

C_'-
. C))C-!},'
" Lu -
_" . tie(-' "
. .'a).
a . a'l),
" i o " a',C)I"Tl
1%-
$.

C0
:-C-i+i>1, a)=
tW"i2;
ad!+
-"':mi:o'2's5;'- :
.. ..l'. Th,.
g
J
"'9 -'
, (_ . }-
,!, ," ... I/l ,;
0, _i,
q. <
:t. _5. i 'i
' iC)','
:> : ' " :_
$,, , "'
@.

J. . 1_,, -
'-i "" j_" '
(J,
:,, . . ,,,:),;,.
i;. Q_
t-",-i
?"l/'
C ,
. .H,,
fi:

Uf
X: ,
;. , ..8:' .
lfl" -
:. - :i
, ' . ' .=I
. II
i , a; l
l
-,,: 7..._1,1
' l/) "
ai;
.. .ic, .,
'a)=.._il-
= ( _C1! - "
- Xi "
'a- IJJ - I
I
:
li
If)
k/l
t"
o
U
-!!
2 _0
l/l
Rate (,iss" ' $253 -4fiffis - :$242 : 1 5*s:B:- .$:'- $'{6:3 -' ' =- I;4:1_ . II' ,. ,11,111:rlll:I I Taskl Projed Management
ProJect Management
{-
f_ ____' _L".._-, _ 3q _ _ :2fi.4 "' I
I
- i-
,-,1. ___ ____;;
I
. 40
$9,7201
Task 4 Subtotal Hours o 24 16 o o o o o o
I
I 40 I
Task 4 Subtotal ($) $0 $6,072 $3,648 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o I $9,720 i Task 8 Construction Support

8.1 Meetings

8.2 Construdion Plans Revisions

8.3 Construdion Engineer's Estimate

8.5 Reimburseables (mileage)
W
.'l
a_-l
I
- ' 1( " - i
ql_" 0. _' II %l # 0 a -_- t
48 o
7 $11,544
$0
$1,386
$0
$0
p+
t. IY,l
'74a -.ar74a'

2..
, ! ,,
..'f' = (
" - (
-_ ;ia
tap %s4%M
2' . '- '
Qail .. ,,
i . '5,
f,, , . l , ,, i
4'lffi+- 's+'Ms _aA'4v *a4affl' l #_ 'aaa, Ql 14'$
Task 8 Subtotal Hours o 24 26 o 5 o o o o I 55 I
Task 8 Subtotal ($) $0 $6,072 $5,928 $0 $930 $0 $0 $0 $0 ' $ol $12,930 I TOTAL
62i,650 I
210
',JjffifTEiPa:!'jilmft!'iAnllaffl'k €W.
t,
%
t
]
!
I "-'-"- '-..""'-"'-'-'--'-'-"""""" "' ""-"""'---'-z-=k-4=:'=. --"' ! -
aan , r=Mb "i('
!t._._.__ . _' _.-....__._ _ ___ -.__.._._ _. _
P!ej@J!jk"f!Mlll%WlM '!:2'!!'f'gg7$i!'iQ!'imgjJlmm 8 (( a'$f '
-'6s
IWI
!iUa
._ -.! -5#,
&
}
j"
' II r
,,g'
.,y_,f.

I .,,..,
'l=h
-:F,: .

I;t .
§" '5. '
im" '
_a, N,,'_, ,,
.;,,J,,f,
a':&
I:;it.:,,
4[:- '
a. 1,3 al .. .i'
l:l - '
:) N ,;.: 0. 21;'
':.. at" ;;i
!-i
u, r
_ _ .. i_ i
tvatiR %rJ
-l_!
0=i='-
{,i l- r!":;:
!ti:
t 'Eh
f fl'A 'y -,',., .1
' f(1 € .
a [k3 '
f. ' l- (I "i
y*,' 4 19 il} itll BO ,}l IH I }l {A )111! f- %'!T ra
M!'lMJil4144i'AWl"l4i'illll a a a z z a a a s z z aa z a z z Aaend Kl60ff MteOng
%@t MrnigrminUCmmlntOon Medlngi taiiumed up big mtgi. 2 hoiux enih mlg) s
t --mA $JQ'%ali j'-a a0i._" '!j. _.... ....'.]"
in
ll.4i0
+a*+. ..._____._____.. Tri}Tin}nimlll)
11101 li.ial I%O If W 11.{!O ii.sn
aTMNl lallil('M'l!llll'lQ-l-II-lli}11Mi
uNll5 Caaidjvtlan 1115my A B. C lebii)
llujy aate Mipplng j"' :'
N-
F€
ih
: l-_ _
3 .1
._.z .. I
IN
IN
Tti} l In}lalzl 11) In W If In In IN
It;!'lifFINillFTJ i a a
0 "
W
m. '
L .._'
j4
'lq"a "" . -
'l l' ,, . ' _::

A j1
!h"" - :'a
A') I
=i . :',i
I!.t!l)
IO
If
I!.!!l
IN
10 IN
T!11 I lubtnml tl} l! !!) ll.jtl
kr YIY '} li41liflTl j&il!ii liT Nl'll
Rejns PQIF Pdage bated on CH TIVIIW iiT CiintepWilimlnay Pmn Itepini Tethnkal tpeil!ani
Cantnan Coit !iOmije
W!IIT Imptotamint Deilgn im Plin %pimbn
#-
€ -
. _ ': Th
I _l m i
" j
. .1
IZl[B
II,!)O
iQ}!O
iuin

10.1!!
IN}Int.l Ill u,ltl ItJIO Il.ut U In Ill jl! li7.4)t
AlijlWf.lllJilli.!i!.1ilali
Rs0ni P!&E Pidigi h on C17 iw iif m% PSM (nhmlltil P+epira Tedihkil Spa'fflcifani
Cordlon Cod Emmrta
Refni P!&E Pidiigs baieil an CRy ieviw d m% ?Slli Snlnmlllil dl WIIIT Impmvemir ! ,
s
3_ _
. (1
, T!
- ' to
li4%
" ' "jt' ;I
I).lt)
Il.il)
lil.OtO
1).41t
Il.ill
l!
Iullol!l Ill 117! ii.tin 11.!l( li}.lK IN IN lit })l li!.!;M l'l'lII.Ifl'll4il41W.IllJilli.Iil.1il'li
IJne PS&! %ektge bmed an C§ Thw aT 9!% PS&! Submal Piepini Tiihnbl tpeilOemoni
Canmu?tni Coij !mmila
Rifne PS&! %dagi baied on Clty ianw 01 95% Ti&E lubmbl aTWam Impmiemer ffl
:

B
%txm-aj;
, i ;4'
- : al
et:ttapl&
,,,i; : :
%: i
m
I .ati ,6
"tm" 's'm
" <*
.'_' -k
.- , '8
-t!
14) ..
b
:;ii,y)Tat
s , l
aiz
;i:i
I!,151 U.1!4
13141

11.174
IN
lOhl6ffll Ill l( li.O!t ll.al( li.6!0 IT).110
if!!'N'fflffi'l"lOXil'l41ollH'l{d'lil
RTI Rsww/Reiptntia
Ratav CFnhttai Snbnn51i
Pieprni AiBut Diamngi 1mm Contgtoi/Chy Redllna
L-.
- aa
i!
m,
. {J
"J 'l=
.
, d
'- i 11
!.
'."4:Effi
l ' II /,,
m
_ 'i,e'.. I
.1
I
It!ih
Il.el

11.{a!
lit
Il.m
114!
If) l( l) 112{0 In tn liO.jit I1ali0
liull IZllO I!l Iff tti.irn
j'JlB;W I!l.!00
GRAND lCllk WDmONAk iuMY jllDGf! Nl(Jut!T ANI) }HA!! In I!).la

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
Ci+ywide Residne+ial Resurfacing Project
Additional Service Request for Phases 1, II, and llli and Phase IV, City Project No. 662-ST

BKF TEAM FEE PROPOSAL
211
Attachment B
Amendment No. 3
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
AMENDMENT N0. 3 TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC WITH BKF ENGINEERS, INC., FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE

CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE I TO IV, CITY PROJECT NOS. 659-ST AND 699-ST
This Amendment No. 3 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC ("Amendment No. 3") for the preparation of additional design and construction documents for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I to IV, City Project Nos. 659-ST and 699-ST (the "Residential Resurfacing Project"), is made and entered into on September 26, 2023, by and between the City of South Gate ("City"), and BKF Engineers, Inc. ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as "Parties."

RECIT ALS
WHERE AS, on November 23, 2021, the City Council approved Contract No. 2021-147- CC with Consultant ("Agreement"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I, II and III, City Project No. 662-ST and the Citywide Sidewalk Improvement, Phase VIII, City Project No. 683-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars ($275,158);
WHEREAS, on July 26, 2022, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement ("Amendment No. l"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST and the Water Main Replacement Project Phase II and Phase III, City Project No. 702-ST, in an amount not-to- exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollars ($458,281); WHEREAS, on June 27, 2023 the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement ("Amendment No. 2"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST for Frontage Road East Street improvement, in an amount not-to-exceed Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Seventy-Seven Dollars ($79,677);
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant therefore desire to execute Amendment No. 3 to the Agreement ( Amendment No. 3), increasing the compensation payable to the Consultant in an amount not to exceed Eighty Seven Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars ($87,416) to fund preparation of additional design and construction water improvement documents along Frontage Road East Exhibit "A" attached hereto and for construction support for the Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I-IV identified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto, under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, bringing the aggregate total of the Agreement, Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 to Nine Hundred Thousand Five Hundred and Thirty One Dollars ($900,531).
1 3'i
212
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

MODIFICATION TO AGREEMENT
Amendment No. 3
to ContractNo. 2021-147-CC

1.1 SCOPE OF WORK. Consultant shall expand its services to the City as identified in Exhibits "A" and Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part to this Agreement. City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.

1.2 COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation paid by the City to Contractor for the work identified in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall not exceed Eighty- Seven Thousand Four Hundred Sixteen Dollars ($87,416).

EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and its amendments, attachments, and exibits thereto, shall remain unchanged in full force and effect. All the recitals to tis Amendment No. 3 are incorporated into the Agreement as modified by this An'iendment No. 3. Furthermore, City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendtnent No. 3 to be executed and attested by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized.

ATTEST:

BY:

Yodit Glaze, City Clerk
(SEAL)
CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

By:

Maria del Pilar Avalos, Mayor
Dated:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BY:

Raul F. Salinas, City Attomey
BKF ENGINEERS, INC.:

Dated: September 28, 2023
2 40 213
EXHIBITA ga@g
/j
August 25, 2023
BKF No. 2021625-11
Mr. Luis H Osuna, P.E.

Deputy City Engineer
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Transmitted Via Email
Subject: Additional Service Request No. 01
E Frontage Road Pavement Rehabilitation
Dear Mr. Osuna:

Per your request, we have prepared this additional service request that addresses work outside the limits of our current contractual scope of work. Identified below are each item with the approximate level of effort needed to address the additional tasks.

1. ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This task includes time for the additional project coordination and site visits in support of the additional improvements as described below.

TASK 5: FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES Per the City's request, BKF shall incorporate, as necessary, the enhancements delineated within the document titled "List of Public Works Projects for the Citywide Parking Study" (see attached Exhibit "A") into the existing contract.

This task includes time for collaboration with the City, aimed at confirming the specific tasks to be integrated into the final project design. Furthermore, it includes the time for the adaptation of the plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) to encompass these identified enhancements.

The original extent of the project's scope had not included any timeframe for the refinement of PS&E documents resulting from the City's review. This task now includes the required time needed for coordination and updates to the PS&E documents, encompassing up to two (2) rounds of review by the City.

TASK 5.1: WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
The City has requested that the project include design for various upgrades to many of the existing water services along East Frontage Road. In general, the City is looking to have the existing PVC water services replaced with new copper and ductile iron services. Relocations and upgrades to many of the fire water services and fire hydrants has also been required. New service connections to the existing main will be made via hot tap (to be installed by City forces) approximately 6-in away from existing service lines. Service lines will be shut off at the corporation stop and capped. We understand the scope of the water system improvements to be as follows:
@ Abandon existing water service at 9841 Frontage Road and replace with a new 2-in service. Existing water meter to be retained.

R
BKF ENGINEERS Jffffl
214
Abandon existing water services at Rockview Dairy and replace with a new 2-in service and a new 1 -in service. Existing water meters to be retained.

Abandon existing water service at 9711 Frontage Road and replace with a new 2-in service. Existing water meter to be retained.

Abandon existing water service at 9590 Frontage Road and replace with a new 2-in service. Existing water meter to be retained.

Replace existing public fire hydrant and concrete apron near Rockview Dairy Replace existing public fire hydrant, including new bury and riser and concrete apron near 9701 Frontage Road.
* Remove exiting 8-in single-check fire service near Rockview Dairy and replace with new 8-in ductile iron service, riser, and double detector check valve.

Remove exiting 8-in single-check fire service near 9590 Frontage Road and replace with new 8-in ductile iron service, riser, and double detector check valve.

BKF will prepare Utility Plans to be incorporated into the overall drawing set, showing the existing utility infrastructure and new water service improvements. References to City standards and supplemental details will be developed and included to illustrate the new connections and appurtenances. Trench paving and concrete hardscape repair will be illustrated on the Improvement Plan sheets.

TASK 6: RESPOND TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION AND SUBMITTALS This task includes time for additional construction support needed with the inclusion of additional improvements as detailed above.

II. COMPENSATION
BKF proposes to provide the additional services on the basis of the current contract. We will continue to invoice for our services per task summarized as follows:
y a I _ _i i a
it I iia+r'i-nimin i l'
1 Project Management $4,744
5 Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates $7,556

5.1 Water System Improvements $11,704
6 Respond to Requests for Information and Submittals $3,640 Please contact me at 949-526-1042 if you have any questions regarding the additional scope items or if we need to meet to review them.

Respectfully,
BKF Engineers
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD
Project Manager/Associate
Page2of2 BKFENGINEERS
\,l'F215

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
I ' " ' !
tj.t_..-'.;.'f:-s;m"'Z'-'<.q_ %,sk ' .illil
l I lffl ' - 'ffli i ) i .. m
i in i i n iii . k t
-k. " "' m'
I:li s:l
'Q"a :"l ' !'IN A; ..a -dL. -, (la5 !)
* stsytl
""" L'f '!Y
" !13 l- A
'4(, 'iA N
T " " ' t: '> -k
, . tia-. . '.:
, 1%@ ..1 ._--
'@ . M
( " 8 'i% o'o.-I 1%
%. 2" :
l ,: '.
a" m.

IIIN
. :! , ! -
."a"ea?"",:
,,.';l@$
la(hhe*) ' C 5
X ! W _ Ih -.
.i a :-
. 2)j" lITh .
.- :';l" QJ
'€ "
. _Ve 1,
.'ya,
PI, Qp ,,;, .1, %,
'i::'7"
<,
}a .
. -a .a_
o";mA" ag,0 'a%-:!... 1_} ,
4)1-,
Vr-he
t.*uisiq
. -O
.(!::
?,: _
_5f
. .. , :.o :
':'":a
-l .C
-&-
_h.
. al
.'e4 '.a'_5 -
l/l'
"---' + ,l
- .J " :
. ..E
.(,_Th" :'.lJ,
a%f;) . ( ,1
fai2{j I I', ' 5 i-Vl.
'
I
B
5 !0
.g
5 I'J
fi7
I
g.}'1
i H
'l '!I_YJ!! ! I,8. v ,}
II-+
; !. .
.;
i)
t'
i,,. m:. i,
Rate yt 3ss.. ' $; !it).. , Jl :2i8;- 1212 i - : =-.$lt II . -$1(i2 - li. -r41[ )3ia.'."1, s :.8 3, - ffi 5! , ..l p kA!141Jil@!li'i!!18!iT €lli'illik s z s s z sz z z q i
ProJedManagement/CooidinationMeetlngs I
Attend Kick-Off Meg5ng .1 " .,;t ' J
; - 2!b'
l.
- -.B-___-(l_. ';a-----tL--
[)
22 so
$4.744
o
22 $0
$4,7411
Taski 1 Subtotal Houri I o 2 12 o 8 o o o o 22 22
Taik 1 Subiotal i$) $0 $520 $2,736 $0 $1488 $0 sa $0
l
$4.744 $4.744
afX1iY*!I'lil'l?'l'llllllV'TTN'lliT1ll'li
=-========-= I
It : .:
ii(:,,7_ = ' :
)L;
,?:: ,, ,,5' . B
braa".
('.- )':
& h 1;A
(l _ . :_:: i_ :'
l
l
o
o
$0
$0
o
o
$0
$0
Taik 2 Subtotal Hours I 0 -O -ti -O [) ' " ' 0 "'- [1' -" "-'O' "- " - '-" - " " -o ,l o o Taik 2 Subtotal i$) $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 so $0 sol
4 $0 $0
1F*!'liflliilliMi'l4il*llil'l'lilili
L-?
4,, . ' ,=,'t'E-' " - :':
u
,ti, .. , "
, { , . } IIf I% (ai-
' I
-aL' I
0 $0 o $0
$0
$0
Taik 3 Subto!al Houti I o o o o o o o 'O -l o o
Taik 3 Subtotal ($)'. $0 $0 $0 10 $0 $0 so $0
$0 if.
$0 $0
kfiN$1liY!lfflSVk$lJal41JI4iilolik&1SI'j4'llli'i!"14 I a Final Plans, Specifications, and Estimates :

5.1 WatetSystemlmptovements IL.i..

C a " '-
al. .'. -" i
" ' %
- -8
> 8g%
_., 40
.. 2B
-'.. . _'26
.a 32
41 $7,556
$11704
4t $7,556
$11.704
Taski5 Subtotal Houti o 3 18 o 32 52 o 'O o 105 105
Taiki S Subtotal ($) : $0 $780 $4.104 $0 liS.952 $8.424 sti $0 lol,f $19.260 sig.;iso
@e1ffl'il!uJI'al'lil4'l'l+1Th1i'lilldlPIilrlT*11l'lVIIXrl'PI'l'Trlllll6T! ' i -'-----'- I
RFI Review/Response
ReviewComadorSubmittals j
Prepare As-Bullt Drawings from Contradoi/Clty Redlines fj'2
t_ '
'&ma'i
:.2 - .:8
i..-m
" 8 l i 18
o
o
$3.640
$0
$0
I 1:

I (l
sa,uti
so
so
Taik 6 Subtotal Houti o o 2 8 B [) "-O -O 01 18 18
Taik 6 Subtotal ($) $0 $0 $456 $1,696 $1488 $0 $0 $0
so iI $3,640 $3.64)
iail.i i i l
Total Houti' -O '-5 - 32 8 52 o o -l i45 145
Total Dollari $0 $1300 $7,296 $1696 $8.928 $8,424 $0 $0 so i $27.644 $27.644 TASK 4 Geotechnical Inves!iqation and Letter Repon II GRAND TOTALi ,l $27.644
Citywide Residnetial Resurfacing Project, Phase I and Phase II, City Project No. 662-ST

BKF TEAM ASROI FEE PROPOSAL
216

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
EXHIBIT "A"

LIST OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS FOR THE CITYWIDE PARKING STUDY Updated Dag
:_ ,ffl. .-.l=a- tta"!.lr_,<Fl:-_ A_.___tIte.i,7%-l-Mh,r.A--,J_ __.,%7-i;'g'_______,_J_l.l;--I#€%i._-i.;El#_I+-:,-l- _I_____________t..-'--,=r-__- _-.-_l _-J.-:7\-J-i...-%.(..__a5a#l0L-'! z===;="- lad-" 41g6#T?Ubl%-i:y;'Jy.i_-,Q-L.',:f-:a,,:_.'.'<1A_,:.w.ffiW:\4i.ll u:-.u..,ffi,_l _-.,W,H.,.,,_I1 -P Illl0il i.li%-tl Jl # I % . . ' - .
l ' .. , ..
["__.:-' € _."%__.a'_.._-'-'_
."a- ""-- "- a:i €ltS ', -a"'.' >a
.,- :J'_"l"""f"ffl -I._=l'f; _ - .- - - piQeai y. ""-'- -" 4 i'0 ' " - j ' a " " : " I '_ _ ____M_' _____-l.. _. _____ _ ._ _ - =i -- __ __ 17-"7:i."' _T"-'=_Ja.f;'ffi__.9%\j:ffi_\'I'effi!!:!' :ffl;.), DESCRIPTION ' 1,,.:...:,.,....=.....,,,.....
1E.'H:i.i."EE.'5:E:E,.

I
Installatlon oL new blke rack sunoundlng
parks and shopplng centers.
i:"33;;;:"'::::'=nS'
I
Modifylng city ordinance oT commercial vehlcles
-1, -"'-'
TASKI
I
Identify public patklng lojs on Tweedy
i::"""V:::"':::'a"l====================-
Identlfy the parks and shopping centers lot
new bike tacks to be installed.
l======-=-iE;EEJ:=:""::"':""'C"'
I
' JASK 2 - "
Prepare exhlblts and work ordeti for
field opetaUons.

Prepare exhibits and work orders for
fleld operatlons
Develop wiiik plan for impnovementi
l===============-
I
l-=-=-=-
4 Reqiieit fundlng to Implement work
orders.

Request funding to implement work
oideti
Requeit funding to Implemem work plan.
l=====,=-=-=-1-=-=-=-=-
'_ -'.T/1SK4- . , Field operationi to Initall signi. Field opetatlons to Initall iigns.

Construct Improvementi JOT each paA and
ihopping center.
1::===-=-=-==-l-=-=-
-l=" " ' -_.-
' : - TASK5 ' I
Prepare outteach literature to promote
public parking liiti.
':Prepare outteach IReiatute to notlfy
Ithe public of the Improvements along
the fire hydranti.

I 1-=-=-=-=-=-
' ruHs .1
Request Enforcement from PD
I 1-=------------------=-
'- - " iASK 7 - " I ICoordlnate enforcement with Pa.

TASK8 " I I
l.._.... I
TOTAL DU!IATION (Wee-ks) " i - .. l--- - - l- . _J
of PW Piolecti and Implementatlon Ivettion 21 updated 7/26/2023 217
EXHIBITB ff
/a
July 6, 2023
Mr. Ken Tang, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Subject: SOUTH GATE CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT ADDITIONAL SERVICE REQUEST NO 3: PHASES I, II, AND Ill Dear Ken:

Per your request, BKF Engineers (BKF) is submitting this Additional Service Request to increase the budget for Bidding Support and Construction Support, and to include our Geotechnical Engineers, GMU, into the contract agreement for Construction Support. The scope of work below includes the work associated with Bidding Support BKF provided to the City, Project Management, and Construction Support.

1. SCOPE OF WORK
TASK 1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
We are requesting additional budget for Project Management for additional meetings with the City, Construction Management Team, and the Contractor during construction. This budget request will also cover the day-to-day project management for Phases 1, II, and Ill, including monthly invoicing, preparing progress reports, and meeting minutes.

TASK8: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
As part of Construction Support, we are requesting to increase our budget as our current budget for Phases 1, II, and II is in the amount of $4,152 with twenty-four (24) hours.

SITE VISITS Et MEETINGS: We have, to date, attended the pre-construction meeting, in-person construction meeting, and site walks with the City, CM, and Contractor. We will assume an additional six (6) meetings via virtual or teleconference.

Pre-Construction Meeting: February 13, 2023 (4 hours) Construction Meeting: March 1, 2023, May 5, 2023 (4 hours per meeting) Site Visits: March 8, 2023, March 13, 2023, March 24, 2023, March 27, 2023, and March 31, 2023 (8 hours per site walk) During the Design Phase, BKF provided the list of tree locations that require the City Arborist to assess. During our site walk with the City, Maintenance Crew, and CM, we were requested to prepare an elaborate assessment of the pavement, curb, gutter, and sidewalk conditions. BKF submitted an exhibit with the inventory oflocations of pavement, curb, gutter, and sidewalk damaged due to tree roots uplifts.

CityofSouth Gatei Citywide Residential Resufacing Project Phases l-Ill Additional Service Request No. 3
1iPage
\,l<'218
CONSTRUCTION PLANS REVISIONS: In addition to on-site meetings and site walks, we are also requesting the budget increase for revising the plans to match the awarded contract the City issued to the Contractor. BKF revised the construction plans to match the Base Bid streets and Additive Alternate Streets per the City of South Gate City Council AGENDA BILL document dated December13, 2022. We updated the Engineer's Estimates to match the added Alternate Bid Items to the Base Bid Items. The following sheets (75 sheets total) were revised and submitted to the City:

G-01
TX-05, TX-06
C-02 through C-24, C-26 through C-33
CD-0.1, CD-01 through CD-39
CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER ESTIMATES: The engineer's Estimate will be revised according to the City of South Gate City Council AGENDA BILL document dated December13, 2022, and the Bid Schedule document dated October 25, 2023.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION: We have included our Geotechnical Engineering subconsultant, GMU, to provide their expertise in responding to RFIs pertaining to pavement improvements, soils conditions and site preparations. This budget increase is also for BKF to respond in writing to written requests for information associated with civil design items.

II. COMPENSATION
Below is the fee breakdown and we propose to continue to invoice in the same manner as the original contract. &n a -
s asix
5!i -1m

1.0 Project Management $6,684

8.0 Utility Locating and Verification

8.1 Site Visits & Meetings $29,532

8.2 Construction Plans Revisions $10,850

8.3 Construction Engineer's Estimates $7,706

8.4 Geotechnical Engineering Services $5,000
m n
m Ql lm! ! J_! LL LM
riih-t-i- <a fl $1' ffffifAlfgJk.A. a M ffi j#jal
Please contact me at 949-526-8478 if you have any questions regarding the additional scope items or if we need to meet to review them.

Sincerely,

BKF ENGINEERS
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD
Associate Principa
CityofSouth Gate i Citywide Residential Resurfocing Project Phases l-Ill Additional Service Request No. 3
21Page
219
South Gate Phase I I
}'a-"" "'=-"'-' s"7T"-=-i-+--'J:""**'*='-'aa-===*,7a-ai! if .i . It!fil . .. , att*ain 0 " " ,, :'. . !
t- '
( "' . ' 4@,pk* "' ='
] '!
I
t " '__ '_' _ _ __ _. __ ]
!AjNt-'Nlffil.}ti.id'Rn iailffi!::'ti41..%l,a!traf!l.'l>'1 €!!N ' .l+'t%'
"h- - -l&-+
6'i ,
:C ,,,
U 3,"
c -:O!!--D.
-B " D!
+rsiWE'
-j7 ,tJ
a6 :-d.
a:: l:
! CL ("l
o.'%. it. 4;;'
- k " .
,. _ ; act), ' ,
' Oat
, 'z:- '
ffli = ,,
.:':' , .%' , I.
, i,'l _ _
Nk -
,. 'q , Q €
' .. 0 - '
;C.

GQ
.yAR.";c/
,J: , ' .
'-a)
" O)!l
,., . ; :,t, .
l (O'0'. 11 % . .
r'iaap2;.
r,,m ?.,._! .
, @g C71
_ 't,a)l .G;" aT-_ ,:"
-.jC_a,- a) :."
'En: 2f a
(:- )'a"
. LLI "l/'tJ
: my "
!:
:ti",
"'aj i.
48 '
'a_
.8
a:S5 a '.:

UQ-
' }.'a- +:6}.iThli .:
-' ,< " =
""+'io'i-' ;(
' "'\34'c- ' = '
." oLEi" L
'.0> }
- ':r.ixa'a)tit 'i lla
, fi:iToF 2_ a -
'- (' I/" ,.lk"'
:',,.+,,"
- aj".L:
. C' o,_
7:-g'4§
yu;-lAf.la:'Ci
T):@.'g:"
%:7(A=..'<J'i"/(O>'
1a61'tta""i'
... -.';(!t-i'; ':
: . !,
' . - ' %
, .. _ W,. .-II i-. Q 7 .
- 5C ' -
J)y_ j
'(4111..."
" aTO;' :
= 8,
. ,l,y;,;,%. . .
'a+tl '
:'l-
.o._:
" 'fi" '
f
f: : t_ ,, ' ..i. a=€ '
i= U,i
!- Gffi:'..= :-:m
" y'
. :' -
'....!.€....)
. 'x"a, ,';
-'-'-.,.".-, -,1;1
}I
_ ";a:l- ;I
':a . ffll', !i'
==' m f '
.,:2E:t.=':'j:, .C %; :, :l
.;ta5!" .si I._C
'-jil
-' -;. ';.-.:-'-:t='i3i
- . I
' , . ,l
il,a'6, .1"'
,l, i 'i .. I
t " ' ..,..::'. ; (/) !A -. '
'v at. -'- .. i!!. ui:,.. i
-'Ca ""
!-.o ;At O_ }
y;.. X _ , ',;
_. .Lu . !{
I
J
', g
IJ
-(Cl
IU
o
U
-(II)
+a '
0 !
f)
(/l
Rate i( ,$g88,;, '_ $2.5.3 .). $:224 $;12 "QEi6., .ii>ip2- '3Ho; == } :, %l,
vA. " 61E - a .1:
. Ii
Taskl Pro3ect Management
ProjedManagement II : *+a ,' "i-ffi-
' " - "t"
_, 'l6:
a." !
= ==, . 0
-a:-a' +-1. -:-...__J'
tl
!
j. . .. .
:a "-- ' :l:: %
' (
'(i:....J!,
t.. :aX ._ ..ll
:'i , , , ." :..

A--i-.' ,,_I_.':;,::'i 28 $6,684 '
Task 4 Subtotal Hours i o 12 16 o o o o o Oi l i 28
Task 4 Subtotal ($) $0 $3,036 $3,648 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 'i $0 'I I
$6,684 .

Task 8 Construction Support

8.1 Site Visits & Meetings

8.2 Construction Plans Revisions .I

8.3 Construction Engineer's Estimate '

8.4 Geotechnical Engineering Services

8.5 Reimburseables (mileage)
m fflm! M m M m li'
I
I
' 140
' 54
38 $29,532
$10,850 ,
$7,706 :
$5,000
$0
l , ,- . .
l"
I .- _
I .S
j .,
l'.
.-iz=
.-.2'
' 2.:
-64:
.,+ ' ,' 1_(r,
" "12-a
.. %-1,
f- - ;
_______.__,j
%t. ,
Q. .fl ia .,}.
&__,-__
-.7fl*
. lb')
" -2!:

J* a_
% . ,4
,, _, , % ,,' J,,,,'la(
7-0--a
;j'
=U.., -
ti' '.
;, -a ___, _ '_
i
. +
lil.l
J
. . ' $,
'A
" &
7i7";
i - §I
I. il
:= . :I
'.., ":le_ ii.1 -' _ 51
' ., - _,li
i, . . ,, lli
1 . , . ,
' "'li
:$-5iO!))?f:

J a' ) la" . }
. 4' . ;:- --.1
Task 8 Subtotal Hours i o 16 92 o 124 o " ' 0 o oi
I 232
Task 8 Subtotal ($) $0 $4,048 $20,976 $0 $23,064 $0 $0 $0 $01 $0 $53,088 :

TOTAL S59,772 ,
Add t ona Service Request No 3
220
Attachment C
Affiendffient No, 2
to ContractNo. 2021-147-CC
fflNDMENT N0. 2 TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC FOR ADDITIONAL DF,SIGN SERVICES FOR Tml CITYWmE RESmENTIAL RESWACING PROJECT, PHASE IS', CITY PROJECT N0. 699-ST BETWEEN THE CJTY OF SOUTH GATE AND BKF ENGINEERS, INC.

This Amendment No. 2 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC (<'Annendment No. 1") for the preparation of additional design and construction documents for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST (the "Residential Resurfacing Project"), is made and entered into on June 27, 2023, by and between the City of South Gate ("City"), and BKF Engineers, Inc. ("Consultant"), City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referredto as "Parties,"

RECITALS
WHEREAS, onNovembet 23, 2021, the City Council appyoved ContractNo, 2021-147- CC with Consultant (<'Agreemerit"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Proje4 Phase I, n and m, City Project No, 662-ST and the Citywide Sidewalk Improvement, Phase VriI, City Project No. 683-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Fifly-Eight Dollars ($275,158);
WHFiREiAS, on July 26, 2022, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC with Consultant ("Agreement"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and eates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No, 699- ST and the Water Main Replacement Project Phase U And III, City Project No. 702-ST, in an mnount not-to-exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollazs ($458,281);
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant therefore desire to execute Amendment No. 2 to the Agreement, increasing the compensation payable to the Consultant in an amount not to exceed Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-Seven Dollars ($79,677) to fund preparation of additional design and constuction documerits for the Res!dential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, bringing the aggregate total of the A@eement, Amendment No, 1, and Amendment No, 2, Amend to Bight Hundred Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Sixteen Dollars ($813,116),
NOW, '11UJ:REFOII, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1, SCOPE OF WORK.

Consultant shall expand its services to the City as identified in Exhibits "A" attached hereto and made a part to t's Agreement. Cit5r reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary,

2. COMPENSATiON. The amount of compensation paid by City to Contractor for llie work identified in Exhibit "A" shall not exceed Seventy-Nine Thousand Six Hundred Sixty- I
221
AtnendmentNo. 2
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
Seven Dollars ($79,667).

3. EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and its Amendments, Attachments, and Exhibits thereto, shall remain in full force. All the recitals to this Amendment No. 2 are incorporated into the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WmFiREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed and attested by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

ATTEST:

Yodit City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVF,D AS TO FORM:

BKF F,N
Cbffs PH. Vice President
Dated: June 28, 2023
2 90 222

EXHIBIT A
BKF Proposal
May 17, 2023
Mr. Luis H. Osui'ia, P.E.

Deputy City Engineer
City of South Gate
8650 California Avemie
South Gate, CA 90280
Transmitted Via Emait
Subjed: E Frontage Road Paven'ient Rehabilitation and ADA Improvements Proposal
Deor Mr. Osuna:

BKF Engineers welcomes the opportunity to submit this proposal for civil engineering and land surveying services associated with the pavement rehabilitation along Southern Avenue/E Frontage Road from approximately 250 feet east of Gafield Avenue to Miller Way in the City of South Gate, Ca(ifornia. The project total length is over O.6 miles, and to arrive at the estimated effort required by our office for this project, we liave outlined a proposed scope of services, identified assumptions, and determined a level of effort fee based on our understanding of the project.

1. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Based on your proposal request and information obtained via einail, we cinderstand the project as:

The projed proposes to grind and overlay the existing pavement and upgrade five (5) curb mmps at the interSeCtiOn Of SOLrtllern AVenUe and Garfield AVenue (NW, SW and SE COrner) and at the interSeCtiOl1 0f Southern Avenue and E Frontage Road (SE rorner). The City pr'oposes five (5) pavement rehabilitation cilternatives:

L Cold Milf Existing asphalt pavement 4 inches, apply 4 inches of asphalt pavement PG-64-1 0.

2. Co!d Mill Existing asphalt pavement 1.5 Inches, apply L.S inches of asphalt pavement PG-64-1 0.

3. Cold Mill Existing asphalt pavement 2 inches, place 2 inches of asphalt pavement PG-64-1 0. Place steel headers at edge of pavement.

4. Cold Mill existing Roadway 1.5" deep.
5, Apply 2" of asphalt pavementl.5" thick, PG-64-10
With the City's intent to rehabilitate the pavement along Southern Avenue/E Frontage Road, we have invited Diaz Yourman at Associates (DYA) as our Geotechnical subconsultant to perform the geotechnical investigations, and provide pavement recommendations for the Project.

II, SCOPE OF SERVICES
TASKI: PROJECTMANAGEMENT
This task covers the day-to-day project management including, monthly invoicing, preparing progress repons, and updating the project schedule. This task also includes preparing for Project Development Teain (PD T) meetings, the agenda, meeting minutes, and attending coordination meetings with the City and design team.

3t 223
TASK2: AGENCYANDUTIIITYCOORDINATION

1. Utility Research: BKF will contact the City and utility (water, sewer, stornl and SCE) companies that serve within the project limits or have utilities within the adjacent streets. We will gathei- the available record drawings and/or block maps to depict the record location of the utilities superimposed onto the existing topographic survey. BKF will also confirm any known (to the City and/or utility companies) deficiencies witli the existing utitities serving tl'ie property and identify any planned upgrades that could impact the developinent.

2. Existing Conditions Review: BKF will visit the site to review the existing site constraints and conditions. We will note any potential challenges to development and confirm our scope of suivey seivices to suppoitthe construction documents. We will document areas that may have tree root uplifts within the pavement, curb, gutter or sidewalk, drainage issues and otl"ier note-worthy existing conditions 3, Potholing services is excluded from this scope of services.

TASK 3: PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING
BtlSE ?MI)P(NG: BKF will research, compile and review existing survey control and mapping data from City and County sources. BKF field crews will establish control and gather field data required for the preparation of a topographic survey of the project site. The survey will be completed using conventional ground survey techniques.

Vertical control will be established from recotded City and or County bench marks.

The City provided the aerial topography of E Frontage Road/Southern Avenue from Garfield Boulevard to Miller Way. We will use the City-provided aerial topography as the base file for the pavementimprovement plans. Profiles will not be provided as part ofthis scope. We also assumed the following:

Suppiemental survey for the four (4) curb ramps at the intersectio+i of Southern Avenue and Garfield Avenue were provided by the City. Additional supplemental survey will be required at the two (2) curb ramps at the ii"itersection of E Frontage Road and Miller Way. The City will provide the datum and basis of bearings used for the survey data received for the curb rarnps at Southern Avenue and Garfie!d Avenue, in order to be in the same datum as the survey data BKF will obtain at the intersedion of E Frontage Road and Miller Way.
* Centerline: We will provide a construction centerline by spfitting the roadway width from curb to curb. * Right-of-way lines within the Project limits will be mapped using the City's GIS AutoCAD file of the existing right-of-way. If right-of-way acquisition is required and if requested by the City, BKF will prepai-e and submit an Additional Service Request to the City for review and approval, which may include ordering Preliminary Title Reports, and preparing plat maps and legal descriptions.

Should the project require a full removal and replacement of pavement, we recommend preparing the improvement plans with the profiles requiring supplemental survey. If reqbiested, we can provide the scope and fees for the supplemental survey.

TASK4: GEOTECHNICALINVESTIGATIONANDREPORT
Witl'i the visual assessment of the pavement, below are Google photos of the following pavement sectioi'is that will be confirmed during the site visit:

224
Ft-ontage Road from Millei' Way to Southern Avenue; one lane each direction, (1,800 feet long) - Poor pavement surface conditions - severe alligator cracks in n'iost of tlie areas within tliis stretcli - depends on the existing pavement sections, mill and overlay inight be viable; but no guarantee - in such case, a full reinoval and replacement may I:ie required.

Southern Avenue from E Frontage Road to Garfield Avenue, one lane e,3cli direction, (1,300 feet long) - Fair condition with low pavement Sutface distresses - Mill and overlay may be a reasonable pavement rehabilitation option but will be verified with the geotechnical borings. * The intersection of GarField Avenue and Southern Avenue - Fair condition with low pavement surface distresses - Mill and overlay may be a reasonable pavement rehabilitation option but viill be verified.

Based on our understanding of the City's request for proposal via email and conversations, the following Geotechnical tasks indude;
Data review, underground utility map review, and prepare a boring/coring locations exhibit.

Apply for a City encroachment permit (only permit), provide business license and Cal.

Mark coring/boring locations at the site, Contact Ui'iderground Service Alert (USA)/DigAlert, follow-up with USA as needed to get "no conflict" confirmation. These locations will be on parking spaces by the airb.
* We assumed the City will issue a peri'nit witliout traffic control plai'is and no lane closures. We will perfortn the coring within parking lane, approximately 6 feet to 8 feet from t)'ie curb line. Diaz Yorirman F3i.

Associates will place cones only within the parking lane and area of tl'ie coring. If traffic control is tequired, we will submit an Additional Seivice Request for City review and approval.

225
Perform coring/boring - coring and hancl augering bases and subsurface soils. This will be peiforined ii'i tt'ie parking lane only; net in active lanes Or intersections. One shift (no more than s hours at the Site) is anticipated during weekdays (no weekend or iiighttiine work. We believe that we can peiforin 5 to a coring/borings locations within this time frame. Backfill with sand/gravel ai'id patched with cold patcli asphalt or rapid set cona-ete dying black [No l'iot patch asphalt will be used to patch the liolesl. If hot patches ai-e required, we will submit an Additional Service Request for City review and approval.

No falling weiqht deflectometer (FWD) testing is necessary; No percolation testing.

Peform lab testing - 4 moisture tests, 4 Passing 200 sieve/Atterberg tests, and 3 R-value tests. * Analyses-Wewillprovidethefollowingnewpavementsections-RHMA/HMA/AB,HMA/AB,and PCC/AB sections.

Letter-Type Re1'iort - This will only consist of existing pavement sections, pavement surface conditions (based on quick drive by survey), subsurface conditions. We can provide a non-standard mill/overlay rehabilitation option, similar to the City's recommended sections. The noi'i-standard analyses for mill/overlay tliickness recommendation will be based on deficiency of AC and AB reqriired (by comparing the existing pavement section and required pavement section based on design traffic index and R value of the subgrade soils) for the pavement to support the design traffic loading over the pavement's design life.

Our Team will discuss with the City our Team's recommended pavement section and the comparison with the City's pavement rehabilitation approach. We will provide the cost analysis and discuss with the City the best course of action that is consistent with tlie City's construction budget.

Please note tliat the correct way to determine the pavement rehabilitation strategy is to peiforin non- destructive test, like the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) per Caltrans guidelines. However, based on the existing pavement section shared by City on 05/10/2023, the East Frontage Road has a pavement sedion 3" of AC over 3" AB. With such shallow asphalt concrete and aggregate base depths, our opinion is that a new pavement section will be required, hence for this roadway segment FWD is not required.

TASK 5: 90% FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES P1ANS: We understand that the City has a lii'nited construction budget, BKF will prepare the concept plan with t)ie rough order of magnitude in construction costs for pavement rehabilitation treatment alternatives within the Projed limits for the City to determine the preferred pavement treatment(s) for E Frontage Road/Southern Avenue from Garfield Avenue to Miller Way. With the concept plan vetted and agreed upon, BKF will work closely with the Team to develop and document the construction plans Project improvements. The Project improvements also include gap closures of the sidewalk, using decomposed granite as the alJ-weather sciiface.

BKF will prepare the following plans:

1. 90% Improvement Plans (7 sheets)
a. Title Sheet (1)
b. Typical Section (1)
c. Plan Sheets (3)
d. Construdion Details (2)
QUAI'lTITY TAV.E-O'rF At'lD Cl)ST ESTl?tlA rE: The team cinderstands there is a finie COnStruCtiOl1 budget associated with the funding and will compare this budget to the Engineers Estimate to confirm both are in alignment.lfappropriate, the team will work with the City to identify possible bid alternates to give the City the flexibility to add or deduct scope.

TECHNIC/!I. SPEC.IFICATIONS: Specifications will be developed using Greenbook 2018, and the City's boilerplate and format

3't 226
TASK6: CONSTRUCTIONSUPPORT
SIN E (.)ei5ERVA.tlC)lslS. SITE (li'iSERVAfal(.'tNS BKF Will Visit tl'lesite tO provide clarification Oftlle consultant's design intent for the contractor, architect or owner. We )iave allocated fees for two (2) visits.

REQUE'il' F(.M" INFl11lMAl lkJlV BKF Will respond in Wriitlg tO written requests fOla informaiion aSSOCiaed Witl1 CiVil design items.

StlBMI I'-I /IL RL1/IEW: BKF Will review and retut'n submittals fil' thOSe included in the SCOpe OfWOrk.

RECOI?D (>RA'i'fli'lGS. Using Contractor provided red- line drawings, BKF will develop and deliver to the City Record Drawings.

Ill. COMPENSATION

1. BASESCOPEOFWORK
BKF proposes to provide tiie services on a lutnp sum basis. We will invoice for our services on a percent complete basis per task summarized as folfows:
m aal' - r )!
1 Project Minagement %e,-ij'ffi'-'
2 Agency and Utility Coordination $10,216
3 Preliminary Engineering $ 12128"
4 Geotechnical Investigation and Report (Optional) $21,67i" 5 90% Plans, Specifications, and Estimates "' $15,920
6 _Biddinc and,Co6structionSup'iort,As-BuiltDrawin4s $13,420 i
I . INffinfffiMM W mjffl
u M
Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. We look forward to assisting in developing this project.

Please contact me at 949-526-8474 if you have any questions regarding our scope of services.

Respectfilly,
BKF Engineers
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD
Associate Principal

227
S831NID1%13 l)19 z lo g a5e,1
SIIWII .L)3rOud
228

BKF ENGINEERS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RATE SCHEDULE
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2023

CLASSIFICATION

PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Principal
SeniorAssociate Principal
Associate Principal
Senior Project Managerl Senior Technical Manager
Project Managerl Teclinical Manager
Engineering Manager I Surveying Manager I Planning Manager

TECHNICAL ST AFF

HOURLY RATE
$288.00
!j268.00
$260.00
$253.00
$247.00
$228.00
Senior Project Engineerl Senior Project Sui'veyorl Senior Project Planner Pi-oject Engineerl Project Surveyorl Project Planner
Design Ei'igineerl StaFf Surveyorl Staff Planner
BIM Specialist I, II, Ill
Technician I, II, Ill, IV
Drafter I, II, Illi IV
Engineering Assistantl Surveying Assistantl Planning Assistant $212.00
186.00
162.00
jl62.00-$186.00 - $212.00
154.00 - $164.00-%180.00 - $194.00
101.00

FIEID SURVEYING
Survey Party Chief
Instrument Person
Survey Cl'iainperson
Utility Locator I, II, Ill, IV
Apprentice I, II, Ill, IV

CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
Senior Consultant
Senior Construction Administrator
Resident Engineer
Field Engineer I, If, Ill

FUNDING & GRANT MANAGEMENT
Director of Funding Strategies
Funding Strategies Manager
Funding/Research Analyst 1, II, Ill, IV

PROJECT ADMINISTRATION
Project Coordinator
Senior Project Assistant
Project Assistant
Clericall Administrative Assistant
$212.00
$182.00
$136.00
$110.00 - $156.00 - $187.00 - $213.00
$83.00 - $112.00 - $124.00 - $132.00
$277.00
$241.00
$179.00
$162.00 - $186.00 - $212.00
$198.00
$181.00
$'] 24.00 - $144.00 - $153.00 - $168.00
$135.00
$117.00
$103.00
!587.00
Expert witness rates are available upon request.

Subject to the terms of a services agreement:

Charges far Outside Sel'viCeS, equipinent, materials, and facilities notfurnislied directly by BKF Engineers Will be billed aS reimbursable expenses at cost plus10o/o. Such charges rnayinclude, but shall not be limited to: printing and reproduction services; shipping, delivery, and courier charges; subconsultant fees and expenses; agency fees; insurance; transportation on public carriers; meals and lodging; and consuinable inaterials.

Allowable mileage will be charged at tl'ie prevailing IRS rate per mile.

Monthly invoices are due within 30 days from invoice date. Interest will be charged at 1.5o/o per montli on past due accounts.

The rates shown are subject to periodic increases, including January 1st of each year BKF ENGINEERS!El 229

ORGANIZATION CHART

ORGANIZATION CHART
The organization chart presented below displays our proposed team organization, deptl'i of resources, and coordination between team meinbei-s. By assigning seasoned engineers and surveyors, BKF will assure a tl'iorocigh work product, a cross-pollinatioi'i of design e:<pertise, ai'id effective inanagement of tlie pi-oject as necessary, ,rO Key Personnel
-A Jason Kirchmann, PE, PLS, QSD
QA/QC Engineer

BKF ENGINEERS
-!o Cl'iris Rideout, PE
Principal in Charge

BKF ENGINEERS
A Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD
Projed Manager

BKF ENGINEERS
-A Bobby Lin, PE
Deputy PM

BKF ENGINEERS

CIVILENGINEERINGSUPPORT SURVEY PAVEMENT
Hooman Jalaie, EIT
Sr. Projed Engineer

BKF ENGINEERS
Nick Woo, EIT
Project Engineer

BKF ENGINEERS
A Nate Parker, PLS
Survey Manager

BKF ENGINEERS
-sO S. Niranjanan, PE, GE
Paveinent Engineer
DIAZ YOURMAN & ASSOC.

City of South Gate i ( Frontage Road
Pavement Rehabilitation !l
230
Attachment D
Amendment No. 1
to ContractNo. 2021-147-CC
AMENDMENT NO. l TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CITYWmE RESmENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE IV, CITY PROJECT N0. 699-ST AND THE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROJECT PHASE II AND In, CITY PROJECT N0. 702-ST BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE AND BKF ENGINEERS, INC.

This Amendment No. l to Contract No. 2021-147-CC ("Amendment No. l") for the preparation of additional design and constniction documents for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST and the Water Main Replacement Project Phase n and nI, City Project No. 702-ST (the "Residential Resurfacing Project"), is made and entered into on April 28, 2022, by and between the City of South Gate ("City"), and BKF Engineers, Inc. ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021, the City Council approved Contract No. 2021-147- CC with Consultant ("Agreement"), to provide engineeig plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I, II and III, City Project No. 662-ST and the Citywide Sidewalk Improvement, Phase VIII, City Project No. 683-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars ($275,158);
WHEREAS, the City has funding for the Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV and the Water Main Replacement project Phase II and III programmed in the 5-Year CIP for Fiscal Year 2022/23;
WHEREAS, the City may accelerate the implementation of the Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV by authorizing Consultant to prepare design and constnuction documents by amending Contract No. 2021-147-CC to incorporate the needed scope of work and fees; WHEREAS, the Water Main Replacement Project Phase II and In proposes water main improvements on four of the streets proposed to be repaved under the Residential Resurfacing Phase IV Project, however, are scheduled to be constnucted after the completion of the Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV Project, which water system improvements would require excavation on four of the newly paved roadways; WHERF,AS, said issue can be mitigated by incorporating the water system improvements proposed on four streets into the Residential Resurfacing Phase IV Project so that the water main improvements can be constructed in conjunction with the road improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant therefore desire to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement, increasing the compensation payable to the Consultant in an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollars ($458,281), to fund preparation of additional design and constnuction documents for the Residential l
lu 231
Amendment No. l
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
Resurfacing Project identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, bringing the aggregate total of the Agreement, Amendment No. l to Seven Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty-Nine Dollars ($733,439.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF WORK.

Consultant shall expand its services to the City as identified in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part to this Agreement. City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.

2. COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation paid by City to Contractor for the work identified in Exhibit "A" and "B" shall not exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollars ($458,281).

3. EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and its Amendments, Attachments, and Exhibits thereto, shall remain in fiill force. All the recitals to this Amendment No. l are incorporated into the Agreement.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]
2 )'7
232
Amendment No. l
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
AMENDMF,NT NO. l TO CONTRACT N0. 2021-147-CC FOR ADDITIONAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CITfflDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE IV, CITY PROJECT N0. 699-ST AND THE WATER MAnSJ REPLACEMENT PROJECT PHASE n AND m, CITY PROJECT N0. 702-ST BETWF,EN THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE AND BKF ENGINEERS, INC.

This Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2021-147-CC ("Amendment No. l") for the preparation of additional design and construction documents for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase IV, City Project No. 699-ST and the Water Main Replacement Project Phase II and nI, City Project No. 702-ST (the "Residential Resurfacing Project"), is made and entered into on April 28, 2022, by and between the City of South Gate ("City"), and BKF Engineers, Inc. ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively referred to as "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2021, the City Council approved Contract No. 2021-147- CC with Consultant ("Agreement"), to provide engineering plans, specifications and estimates for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I, II and I, City Project No. 662-ST and the Citywide Sidewalk Improvement, Phase 'AI, City Project No. 683-ST, in an amount not-to-exceed Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Fifty-Eight Dollars ($275,158);
WHEREAS, the City has fiinding for the Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV and the Water Main Replacement project Phase II and m programmed in the 5-Year CIP for Fiscal Year 2022/23;
WHEREAS, the City may accelerate the implementation of the Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV by authorizing Consultant to prepare design and constnuction documents by amending Contract No. 2021-147-CC to incorporate the needed scope of work and fees; WHEREAS, the Water Main Replacement Project Phase II and III proposes water main improvements on four of the streets proposed to be repaved under the Residential Resurfacing Phase IV Project, however, are scheduled to be constnucted after the completion of the Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV Project, which water system improvements would require excavation on four of the newly paved roadways; WHEREAS, said issue can be mitigated by incorporating the water system improvements proposed on four streets into the Residential Resurfacing Phase IV Project so that the water main improvements can be constructed in conjunction with the road improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant therefore desire to execute Amendment No. l to the Agreement, increasing the compensation payable to the Consultant in an amount not to exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollars ($458,281), to fund preparation of additional design and constnuction documents for the Residential 1 l'(
233
Amendment No. 1
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
Resurfacing Project identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, biging the aggregate total of the Agreement, Amendment No. I to Seven Hundred Thirty-Three Thousand Four Hundred and Thirty-Nine Dollars ($733,439.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF WORK.

Consultant shall expand its services to the City as identified in Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part to this Agreement. City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as the City deems necessary.

2. COMPENSATION. The amount of compensation paid by City to Contractor for the work identified in Exhibit "A" and "B" shall not exceed Four Hundred Fifty-Eight Thousand Two Hundred Eighty-One Dollars ($458,281).

3. EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS. Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement and its Amendments, Attachments, and Exhibits thereto, shall remain in full force. All the recitals to this Amendment No. I are incorporated into the Agreement.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]
2 iq
234
Amendment No. l
to Contract No. 2021-147-CC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed and attested by their respective officers hereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF SO[m[ GATE:

Al Rios, Mayor
ATTEST:

By:

Yodit G City Clerk
()
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

F. Salinas, City Attorney
BKF ENGINEERS. mC.
235
BKF Proposal
July18, 2022
Mr. Ken Tang, PE
Senior Civil Engineer
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Subject: SOUTH GATE CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT ADDITIONAL SERVICE REQUEST NO 1: PHASES 1, It, AND Ill SUPPLEMENT AL SURVEY

REQUEST AND PHASE IV SCOPE OF SERVICES AND FEES
Dear Mr. Tang:

This letter constitutes BKF Engineer's (BKF) request for additional budget for supplemental survey.

The supplemental survey for Phases /, //, and /// was reduced to six days for the two-person Survey Crew. With 64 intersections (174 curb ramps) for Phases 1, II, and Ill, the total number of days required to complete the supplemental survey is an additional 10 days. We are requesting an additional 10 days for the two-person Survey Crew to be added to our current budget for Phases 1, II, and Ill. Please note that on an average, our survey crew completes four intersections per day.

A separate line item for this budget request is included as the last line item in the Fee Pmposai.

This Additional Service Request is also in response to the City's request for BKF to provide engineering consulting services for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project for Phase IV for the street segments listed and highlighted in orange shown iriAttachmentA.

SEGMENT STREET FROM TO
1 Santa Ana Avenue Seville Avenue Madison Avenue
2 Liberty Boulevard Long Beach Boulevard California Avenue 3 Madison Avenue Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
4 Deeble Street Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
5 Victoria Avenue Tweedy Boulevard Southern Avenue
6 Missouri Avenue State Street California Avenue
7 Mariposa Lane City Limit Sequoia Drive
8 Elizabeth Avenue City Limit Tweedy Boulevard
9 Virginia Avenue City Limit Tweedy Boulevard
10 Adella Avenue Southern Avenue Legacy Lane
Ci+yofSouth Gatei Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV Additional Service Request No. l
1lPage
2,i 236
Based on our conversation and your email request for the added engineering services for pavement rehabilitation along the streets within Phase IV. We have identified the scope of work required for Phase IV as listed below:

SCOPE OF WORK
TASK1: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
This task covers the day-to-day project management for Phase IV including, monthly invoicing, preparing progress reports, and updating the project schedule. This task also includes preparing for Project Development Team (PDT) meetings, the agenda, meeting minutes, and attending coordination meetings with the City and design team.

TASK2. AGENCYANDUTILITYCORDINATION
DATA RESEARCH : BKF will review City record maps and utility company records for all previous work performed to date in the Project vicinity that impacts the design of the improvements including:

Existing improvement plans / engineering reports of record Applicable design standards, codes, and plan processing procedures UTILITY COORDINATION AND MAPPING: BKF will identify existing utilities within the project limits.

BKF will request utility maps and send out utility verification and information requests to utility purveyors present. Based on an agreement with the City for Phases /, //, and ///, BKF will capture the utility features within the surface of the pavement only and map in AutoCAD to develop the utility base mapping. Since the water mainline replacement will be included in the Phase IV scope of services, we will map the underground utilities to identify the potential utility conflicts with the relocated water main. We will engage with the utility companies that will be required to adjust their facilities to grade.
potholing services is exduded from this scope of services.

TASK3: PRELIMINARYENGINEERING
BASE MAPPING: BKF will research, compile and review existing survey control and mapping data from City and County sources. BKF field crews will establish control and gather field data required for the preparation of a topographic survey of the project site. The survey will be completed using conventional ground survey techniques. Vertical control will be established from recorded City and or County bench marks.

BKF will provide aerial topography with limits and panels. Mapped survey data will then be compiled by BKF staff to create a project site topography map at a scale of 1" = 20' with1-foot contours, and provide:

CilyofSouth Gatel Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV Additional Service Request No. I
21Page
237
Centerline: We will provide a construction centerline by splitting the roadway width from curb to curb.

Right-of-way lines within the Project limits will be mapped using the City's GIS AutoCAD file of the existing right-of-way. If right-of-way acquisition is required and if requested by the City, BKF will prepare and submit an Additional Service Request to the City for review and approval, which may include ordering Preliminary Title Reports, and preparing plat maps and legal descriptions.

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND REPORT: GMU will provide the geotechnical services required for Phase IV, which include the following:

Perform a document review of existinq as-built drawinqs and peotechnical/pavement reports provided to us. The information gathered from this review will be considered in the analysis and development of pavement repair recommendations (i.e., existing pavement section thicknesses, date of last pavement improvement work, etc.).

Perform a limited pavement surface condition assessment to identify the type, extent, and severity levels of the pavement distresses in general accordance with ASTM D 6433. The general condition of the various pavement areas will be documented and summarized, and photos of the pavement surFace condition will be taken.

Pavement coring locations will be marked in coordination with the City and Dig Alert (Underground Service Alert) will be notified to aSSess potential conflict with known underground utilities prior to performing pavement corings.

SUBSURFACE EXPLORAT!ON: GMU will utilize the previously obtained encroachment permit from the City of South Gate for the proposed field exploration. We have assumed permits from other agencies are not required, including Caltrans.

Six-inch diameter pavement corings will be performed to a maximum depth of four (4) feet below the top of the existing asphalt surface using an electric-powered core drill. Sampling and digging below the AC section will be performed using hand tools. The thickness of the existing asphalt concrete (AC) and aggregate base (AB), where encountered, will be recorded. Other information such as aggregate base type and presence of petromat fabric will be recorded as well. In addition, a bulk sample of the subgrade soil will be collected.

Upon completion of the sampling, the core hole will be back-filled with soil cuttings or other suitable backfill materials and capped with asphalt concrete cold patch. We will perform a total of 22-24 pavement corings (3 days).

Traffic control will consist of 3-5 cones around work zone. We have assumed that troffic control plans will not be required and costs to have traffic control plans prepared or CityofSouth Ga+ei Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV Additional Service Request No. l
3 Page
238
stamped is not considered in our fee.

LABORATORY TESTING: Laboratorytesting will be conducted in ourAASHTO and Caltrans certified laboratory on the samples collected from the field investigation program. Laboratory tests will include:

R-value;
Sieve No. 200 wash for soil classification;
Atterberg Limits for soil classification;
Maximum density and optimum moisture content; and
In-place moisture.

The quantity of testing has been estimated based on our experience with similar past projects.

PAVEMENT ENGINEERING ANALYSIS: Pavement engineering analysis will be performed in accordance with the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. Caltrans AC design methodology considers the relationship between the traffic index (Tl), subgrade soil strength (through R-value testing), and the gravel factors of the various pavement layers, allowing us to recommend a pavement structural section for the expanded area, and to provide pavement rehabilitation recommendations. We will utilize the Tl approved by the City from Phases 1, II, and Ill, and apply to Phase IV.

PAVEMENT EVALUATION AND REHABILITATION RECOMMENDATIONS: Work and findings from the geotechnical investigations for Phase IV will be incorporated into the Phaselthrough /// Geotechnica/ Report currently being prepared, which will include the following information:

Summary of relevant information gathered from the document review; Project location map;
Subsurface exploration location map;
Pavement coring information (asphalt concrete thickness aggregate base thickness, subgrade soil type, etc.);
Select photographs of the pavement surface condition; Laboratory testing results;
Conclusions; and
Pavement rehabilitation repair recommendations.

If the City elects to have the Geotechnical Report for Phase IV as a stand-alone report, the BKF Team will prepare an ASR to the City for review and approval.

Ci+yofSouth Gatel Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV Additional Service Request No. l
41Page
239
WATER MAINLINE REPLACEMENT: Per the City's request, we will design the water mainline and prepare the plan and profile sheets at 40-foot scale along:

Kansas Avenue from Alameda Street to Long Beach Boulevard Missouri Avenue from Alameda Street to Long Beach Boulevard Indiana Avenue from Alameda Street to Long Beach Boulevard Nebraska Avenue from Alameda Street to Long Beach Boulevard The water mainline will be replaced with ductile iron pipe per the City of South Gate design standards. lmprovementswillincludethereplacementsofwaterlaterals,firehydrants,watermeters and isolation valves.

Supplemental Survey: The supplemental survey for the water improvements plans will include 100- foot intervals from back of walk to back of walk, and will capture the centerline, grade breaks within the cross section of the roadbed, edge of gutter, flowline and top of curb. The additional topographic survey in linear feet is approximately 13,700 feet for the four street segment listed above.

TASK 4: 65%, 95% and 100% FINAL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND ESTIMATES PLANS: We understand that the City has a limited construction budget, BKF will prepare the concept plan with the rough order of magnitude in construction costs for the pavement rehabilitation of street segments within the Project limits for the City to determine the limits of improvements for Phase IV. With the concept plan vetted and agreed upon, BKF will work closely with the Team to develop and document the construction plans Project improvements. BKF will prepare the following plans:

Title Sheet
General Notes, Legend, and Abbreviations
Typical Sections
Street Improvement Plan (includes existing above ground utilities and ROW/Parcel boundaries from City-provided GIS)
Signing and Striping Plans
Water Improvement Plans (40-Scale Plan and Profile)
QUANTITY TAKE-OFF AND COST ESTIMATE: The team understands there is a finite construction budget associated with the funding and will compare this budget to the Engineers Estimate to confirm both are in alignment. If appropriate, the team will work with the City to identify possible CityofSouth Gate I Cifywide Residentiol Resurfacing Project Phase IV Additional Service Request No. T
51Page
240
bid alternates to give the City the flexibility to add or deduct scope.

TECHNICAL SPECIF(CA-rlONS: Specifications will be developed using Greenbook 2018, and the City's boilerplate and format.

TASK 5: CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT
Sl-I-E OBSERVATIONS: SITE OBSERVATIONS: BKF will visit the site to provide clarification of the consultant's design intent for the contractor, architect or owner. We have allocated fees for two (2) visits.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION: BKF will respond in writing to written requests for information associated with civil design items.

SUBMITTAL REVIEW: BKF will review and return submittals for those included in the scope of work.

RECORD DRAWINGS: Using Contractor provided red- line drawings, BKF will develop and deliver to the City Record Drawings.

CityofSouth Gate l Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project Phase IV Additional Service Request No. 1
61Page
241
3 ll'.."l
l IJ
AVE. SCHOOL
to 3 STRFFTS UNnFR DFSTGN
It
4'l
242
ik'4!!.'5;rk."W!!<::x;a";. i-'R''sw t) ':-.:AT: A ffll: 7i;: ,%07,: :J.'2,:":%T a4WffiAaiWWi i; v:"iV * M','J_:Thl "' "- o "-Ji'
...., p, "!_,-
' ::. ':. . :4
J===J
4 -,%!
I+t%# =X5+!*!1<AJ-
J t'as",.--a'a4!ycaa'i'a'
- -='Qa:,;l'aax;P' @' :*:':_rjZ ;-% a *, 5, ;. 5., 4@-6 ,t('l_%' -(ys, -J 6 e r k i!!(""ffi 'Wli
,.1;it =-'..4 yii6k...s. !ffi *a "-t, ._ ;a==-'-M-.-;} . _&, :L !l . -7 '8- =..._ '#!t'..: "_t-) ' i
"-'!" A"'$
fflfflmK#M!lla'lj!ml
A t"'4;" %'a:t .4k"ffiaaA"='4'a:'(jl
E. ,mSe 'r=.a' :. ij ")('i(. :--=.:'
411=1 [',=l...."t, =lr,,,l"
',,"!ll=l" '!j_"'6j":'.:
,t!> . 4 .k4 ,-; 'V, j ;I$_ 'A - '_, . .4. ' .:
' k - y ! W 3: &.. ';,l. fA -i
,",,J ":1':':";21.- ,l
. ,,. i I. , JimJi . I- .i[ ;.'
$t3 : l
@!l
I,i.i
i ,
€
-I
§l
5 4, a('

4. ,'::*' Q'J
l:

IJ
k
t
%
%
41 ffi,;:,<._
q5@'
%.,'l-l..,11';,, yRate Iax$ 2"&W _..A )1_ Iak - ig :l_- :J1 JlL- _.JI! €I k._: n (l)Is 6aJ i_,$1 7 ffi. 'l i$1 3 7.. -=% i I 24!ai, I I Q Q
Attend Kick-Off Meeting
Ptojed Management/Coordination Meetings l" ,, . 22': 4 l -, .j2
' #--' a&'llPA
r ._ %,t ==+i24:
'(..( ,l
--..-i=.t=sl4
...
,.,,i, ,-.t
&.%taZjt keii. Jsrt kw;dl &ad+ iak 12
72 $13'.;0': I
2 72 sigh,gouss I!:IA' -l:2
:""-"-' T
it-_ix.ga' i.t!
Tasks 1 Subto!al Hours l- 25 13 24 12 o o o ol I 74 I 74 I Task 1 Subtojal [$)
2 $5.450 $2,561 H,ggz $1!)20 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $14,323
4"a"a
aAYff:l'lilnffi(TT'FTI a i s a s
utility Coordination (tltllity A, B, C Letters)
Utility Base Mapping
l:
.'
"!
Th
4 "
t_ _
!
14 ___ 7,
" . " "rs:
j _ ,l,,,!!_L _.,___
'- :!i
, ;:<!!_ __ is
-i
:;___i
f ie
i4
'i
.1
]
:..l,;
;_ _)
)
I I 34
gs
$4,404 I
$15,232 I
34'
gs
;,;,l
Task 2 Subtotal Hours o TO o 16 40 48 16 o o 130 I 130 Task 2 Subtml ($)
* 0 0 i* s ffQL - - L ] - 4 J k l! €%
I so $2,180 $0 s,i,g;is $6,400 $6,720 I $1,408 $0 $0 Itg,sss I _. $19.6361 lfi!n*Ji"llliNiTlTi!J4MiT4- ia ii z I
I
IF ' a
%
'('
.iJa
: ;..
l'i _ ,.

J
';l
';i4
7,,
4-
# =- .
.k a !R2:W
'J
,!l'
k'Xt-a%4a-.tsffi
-"4
.. . ?
- a!
" " ' ffi
b_b*t_'-b-qX'6'-
:@ + - '-
% , -io
K "56
_ -8'
L m:m"e4i;;
"'1
!
. .' !
' A""'J
-=J'_*'2'!
hl
i 240
I 648
I 36
i 40
$36.680 ,
$;00,2;1:, I
$$:jlB,trJi86 1,
$6,288 i
-;!Ql
648
36 40
.$:is.m. I
$ioo,;i<s i
ai,zoo i
Mi.iis i
$s,ass i
$s,;im i
li
l'"'.i
i -J
..": !
:-_ il
iJ
i'
'a. :'l
ai
il
.!
4 'aaJJ
0 I @," aa ' V. k1, ,14,.iR: .- !m ) '_
%'a.:eTh;3
r:7A
k . 110
0 9,
;/; - Ill,
"t4'&saa" M;S"
Task 3 Subtotal Hours ' o 28 64 24 104 200 o 272 272 96il i 964 I Task 3 Subtotal ($) $0 $6104 :T2,608 $4,392 $16,640 :28.000 $0 $49.504 $31824 Iziasgo I $2j3,390 IFiiThli%l'fi Tal'llj%lkldllllill!iillllk
Refine PS&E'Package based on City review of Concepl/Preliminary Plan Prepare Technical Specifications
Construdion Cost Esiimate
Water Improvement Design and Plan Preparation
z s a s
! '-1.
f
2 y
,'a
8 :. . . ,,
l - '
: =f;'
." 8
4 . ,,-,,,,flp .: . , .(io.

PK>, ,l l-11$ IJI
,,:;%
.. IF
;.-:-4a:
'it tmd Qllim VMww 10€ll. lam.J 4
2')6
24 44
222
$46.00B ,
$4.672 ,
$7,296
$36.096
.2!16'
24 44
222
$46,008'
$4,672
$7,2!'6
$36,(196
'.'
4 0 , '
-*
Fffi'!:
"j
l;,,,:J
!
#
S
:'-=-==!
.1
;, !
97 -
!
;!l
')
j
@r =;-a -,,
r ,o";ar _:
l i "
_-tt.' alaAr_a'
E'a7+"rt. :-X-'I,

1. . '
Sukmtal Houis I o 34 20 120 154 258 o o o 586 sas
iaia* Subtotal($)
$0 $7,412 $3.940 $21,960 $24,640 $36,120 $0 $0 $0
4 $94.072 ' $94072
8$-K#!:441f4i!'U;ltlMlMlil@II s i z a
Refine PS&E Package based on City review o'f 60% PS&E Submittal PrepareTechnicel Specifications
Construdion Cost Estimate
Refine PS&E Package based on City review of 60% PS&E Submittal of Water Improvements \,,)l -
,l
' 8.

A
4 6 ._N
* %}
-' . 4
'a:.l6
- :l(i
_ _ _42
--a.iJ kb r'mui lami&'-aj [ ='d i.l';J JWAdll:
a( '
I
TOO
20 38
128
3is,goo i
$3,800
$6.0621
$20.878 i
100
20a
38 128
$15,94€1
$3,800
$6,062
'J20,878
- "F - '-i"A{-
' s, ' , 40,i. _ -ffl'a'a'-' """'440';'
' " a N
' ":24
, _?68j
l!-,"=-1
k.
r 'i
I
=_ . .)
"i
i
)
-if
, ,i
jaf *1a aar _a 'IN
Subctal Houis ' u 22 12 80 40 132 o o o 286 286
Subtotal ($) $0 $4.7% $2,364 $14.640 $6,400 $18.480 I $0 $0 $0 $46,680 Iffl. $4&68a
oKilJll!!!'J'lla!il41aNJ'!lUilW!iR)iilali i a
Refine PS&E Packgge based on City review 6f aS%'P!;&E Submittal PrepareTechnlcal Specifican6ns
Construdion Cost Estimate'
Refine PS&EPaaiage based on City review of 95% PS&E Submittal otWater Improvements R+...,. . 14..

I 01
I:.
il
li &.'
I + ' a
,:, _ _ _ _ . ai
6 ' 20
\'
' Q
;{ ' :'
_.i'-_-_ _m
"" a B
.,;, - %, 's
- {;,_- 6'
_ _ _. Hl.i%
.i__Y .aa
i't '_ - -.
='_: % .' -b" a.
iz;,:,:':::'i!
H;;;=;\i,;i':1
i
i
;
[" ";
l),-
l'
IL'i -
'i
im'
i. " .'
, .1;,
yvm
) "
li
A - ' -,,i -
b.;sit
46 ltl
18 74
%7.572 'i
'xi.goo l
s.i.gaa.i
$12,274
46 iO

18. ' 74'
:S7,572.
$i,900
$2,934
$12,274
Subtotal HOLII'S o 14 10 46 16 62 o o o M8 I .148
_ Subtotil($) $0 $3,052 $T.970 $8.418 $2,560 $8,680 s.0 $0 $0 $24.6801
. $2468a
!j.t4!ljal!11ffiiil €!ffi!iiljUllJJiilv! ii s a a a a 81 II
RFI Revlew7Response
' Revlew Contractor Subniitials
PrepareAs-Bullt Dtawings'from Conttador/City Redlines :H
It
-f-i: -,.,_]
.-(
'!,
-'="4!.-
'! '.': " a '!'!17
i . :J!6:i_ , .
.S._l,l;.:a(,als,0,.':':l;s)"i.F,,,lJz7,:,,I,l.l'.,,
s
!
c
! t-_-'!
;.$
;J61,= K
_'hJLj
:if= '='(-.a.d"
a: l' ; ',:
i, , . :. ,If,If ,"'j;. , {;.

J"7:'!
: " a.: "i.?
50 68
14 I
$7.980 I
$1i.484
5a,ns i
50 sa
14 $7,gso:
$11,484.
$2,116
Task 5 Subhl Hours 1 o 28 o 60 o 12 32 o o 132 132
Taskssubtohi($)l $0 $6,104 $0 sio.gso $0 $1.680 $2,816 $0 $0 $21,580 $21,580 m)fi! I i ia i i i i i
Totl Hours o 161 119 €70 365 712 48 272 272 2320 I 232(1 Total Dollars , $0 $35.0!18 $23,443 $67.710 $58,560 %!10,580 I $4,224 $49.504 $31824 $434,361 . $434,361 SUBTOTAL W54.B51
243
Attachment E
Contract No. 2021-147-CC
BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH GATE AND BKF ENGINEERS, INC.

This Agreement for Professional Services for Design Services ("Agreement") is made and entered into on November 23, 2021, by and between the City of South Gate, a municipal corporation ("City"), and BKF ENGINEERS, INC., a Califomia corporation ("Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, City desires to retain a qualified provider for certain services relating to design services for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I, II and III, City Project No. 662-ST and the Citywide Sidewalk Improvement, Phase VIII, City Project No. 659-ST; and WHEREAS, Consultant warrants to City that it has the requisite skills, knowledge, qualifications, manpower and expertise to perfomi properly and timely the Professional Services under this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, based on such representation, City desires to contract with Consultant to perform the services as described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A" of this Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE,, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. City hereby engages Consultant, and Consultant accepts such engagement, to perfonn the services set forth in the Scope of Services as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part of this Agreement. The Scope of Services may be mutually amended from time to time by both Parties in writing.

2. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES. The total amount of compensation for this Agreement shall not exceed the sum of Two Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Fifty- Eight Dollars as described in Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A." City shall pay Consultant for its professional services rendered and costs incurred pursuant to this Agreement. No additional compensation shall be paid for any other expenses incurred, unless first approved in writing by Director of Public Works or his/her designee.

2.1 Consultant shall be required to attend meetings at City Hall as necessary in the delivery of the projects. Travel time between Consultant's office and City Hall shall not be billable, Consultant may request an exemption on a case-by-case basis, which shall be subject to City approval.

2.2 Consultant shall be paid in accordance with the schedule included in Consultant's proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A." City shall pay Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of the invoice.

2.3 No payment made hereunder by City to Consultant, other than the final payn'ient, shall be construed as an acceptance by City of any work or materials, nor as evidence of 5116863.1 -L235.0
Page I of 9
244
satisfactory perforz'nance by Consultant of its obligations under this Agreement.

3. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement is effective as of November 23, 2021, and will remain in effect for a period of two (2) years from said date or until project completion, unless otherwise expressly extended and agreed to by both Parties in writing, or terminated by either Party as provided herein.

4. CITY AGENT. The Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works ("Director"), or his/her designee, for the purposes of this Agreement, is the agent for City. Whenever approval or authorization is required, Consultant understands that the Director, or his/her designee, has the authority to provide that approval or authorization.

5. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall not acqriire any interest, direct or ixidirect, in any real property located in the City which may be affected by the services to be performed by Consultant under this Agreement. Consultant further represents that in perfon'nance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Witliin ten (10) days, Consultant agrees that it will immediately notify City of any other conflict of interest that may exist or develop during the term of this Agreement.

5.1 Consultant represents that no City employee or official has a material financial interest in Consultant's business. During the term of this Agreement and/or as a result of being awarded this contract, Consultant shall not offer, encourage or accept any financial interest in Consultant's business or in this Agreement by any City employee or official.

6. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDffIONS.

6.1 Termination for Convenience. City may terminate this Agreement at any time without cause by giving fifteen (15) days written notice to Consultant of such tennination and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event, all finislied or rmfinished docun'ients and other materials shall, at the option of City, become its property. If this Agreement is terminated by City as provided herein, Consultant will be paid the total amount of its costs as of the tenniriation date. In no event shall the amount payable upon termination exceed the total maximum compensation provided for in this Agreement.

6.2 Termination for Cause.

6.2.1 City may, by written notice to Consultant, terininate the whole or any part of this Agreement in any of the following circumstances:
a, If Consultant fails to perform the services required by this Agreement within the time specified herein or any authorized extension thereof', or b. If Consultant fails to perform the services called for by this Agreement or so fails to make progress as to endanger performance of this Agreement in accordance with its tertns, and in either of these circumstances docs not correct such failure withing a period of ten (10) days (or such longer period as City may authorize in writing) after receipt of notice from City specifying 5116863.1-L235.0

245
sucli failure.

6.2.2 In the event City temiinates tliis Agreement in whole or in part as proyided above in Subsection 6.2.1, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may deem appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

6.2.3 If tbis Agreement is terminated as provided above in Subsection 6.2.1, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, drawings, maps, pliotographs, reports, films, charts, sketches, computations, surveys, models, or other similar documentation prepared by Consultant. Upon such termination, Consultant shall be paid an amount equal to the value of the work performed. In ascertaining the value of the work performed up to the date of termination, consideration shall be given to both completed work and work in progress, to complete and incomplete drawings, and to other documents whether delivered to City or in possession of Consultant, and to authorized reimbursement expenses.

6.2.4 If, after notice of termination of the Agreement under the provisions of Subsection 6.2. l above, it is determined, for any reason, that Consultant was not in default, or that the default was excusable, then the rights and obligations of the Parties shall be the same as if the notice of termination had been issued pursuant to Subsection 6.1. above.

6.3 Non-Assignability. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement without the express prior written consent of City.

6.4 Non-Discrimination.

6.4.I Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of to race, creed, gender, gender identity (including gender expression), color, religion, ancestry, sexual orientation, national origin, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, or veteran/military status, in the perfori'nance of its services and duties pursuant to this Agreement and will comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of the Federal, State, and County and the City governments. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, ancestry, sex, national origin, disability, or age. Consultant will take affimative action to ensure that all employment practices, including those of any subcontractors retained by Consultant to perform services under this Agreement, are free from such discrimination. Such employment practices include, but are limited to:
hiring, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recniitment, recruitment advertising, layoff, terinination, rates of pay or other fori'ns of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship.

6.4.2 The provisions of Subsection 6.4.2 above shall be included in all solicitations or advertisements placed by or on behalf of Consultant for personnel to perfortn any services under this Agreement. City shall have access to all documents, data, and 5116863.i-L235.0

246
records of Consultant and its subcontractors for purposes of deten'nining compliance with the equal employment opportunity and non-discrimination provisions of this Section, and all applicable provisions of Executive Order No. 11246 (relating to federal restrictions against discriminatory practices) is available for review and on file with the City Clerk's Office.

6.5 Insurance. Consultant shall submit to City, certificates indicating compliance with tlie following minimum insurance requirements no less than one (l) day prior to beginning of perfomiance under this Agreement:

6.5.1 Workers Compensation Insurance as required by law. Consultant shall require all subcontractors similarly to provide such workers' compensation insurance for their respective employees.

6.5.2 Comprehensive general and automobile liability insurance protecting Consultant in amounts not less than $1,000,000 for personal injury to any one person, $1,000,000 for injuries arising out of one occurrence, and $500,000 for propeity damages or a combined single limit of $1,000,000, with an aggregate of $2.,ooo,ooo. Each such policy of insurance shall:
a. Be issued by a financially responsible insurance company or companies admitted and authorized to do business in the State of California or which is approved in writing by City.
b. Name and list as additional insured the City, its officers and employees. c. Specify its acts as primary insurance.
d. Contain a clause substantially in the following words: "It is hereby understood and agreed that this policy shall not be canceled except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City of such cancellation or material change."
e. Cover the operations of Consultant pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.

6.6 Indemnification. Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold hamiless City and/or any other City agency, including other employees, officers and representatives, for/from any and all claims or actions of any kind asserted against City and/or any other City agency arising out of Consultant's (including Consultant's employees, representatives, products and subcontractors) negligent performance under this Agreement, excepting only such claims or actions which may arise out of sole or active negligence of City and/or any other City agency, or any third parties not acting on behalf of, at the direction of, or under the control of Consultant.

6.7 Compliance with Applicable Law. Consultant and City shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinanccs, and codes of the Federal, State, County and City governments, without regard to conflict of law principles.
5H6863.1-L235.0

51 247

6.8 Independent Contractor. This Agreement is by and between City and Consultant and is not intended, nor shall it be construed, to create the relationship of agency, servant, employee, partnersliip, joint venture, or association, as between City and Consultant.

6.8.1 Consultant shall be an independent contractor and sliall have no power to incur any debt or obligation for or on behalf of City. Neither City nor any of its officers or employees sliall have any control over tlie conduct of Consultant, or any of Consultant's employees, except as herein set forth, and Consultant expressly warrants not to, at any time or in any manner, represent that it, or any of its agents, servants or employees are in any manner employees of City, it being distinctly understood tliat Consultant is and shall at all times remain to City a wliolly independent contractor and Consultant's obligations to City are solely such as are prescribed by tliis Agreement.

6.8.2 Indemnification of CalPERS Determination - In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or CalPERS to be eligible for enrollment in CalPERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indeinnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for CalPERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as, for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

6.8.3 Business License Required. According to Title 2.08.40 of the South Gate Municipal Code, a business license will be required prior to doing business within the City, even if the business is located outside of the City. Verification of a valid South Gate business license will be required prior to start of work and any fees associated with the acquisition or maintenance of such business license shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant.

6.9 Consultant's Personnel.

6.9.1 All services required under the Agreement will be perfon'ned by Consultant, or under Consultant's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess tlie qualifications, peri'nits and licenses required by State and local law to perfomn such services, including, without limitation, a City of South Gate business license as required by the South Gate Municipal Code.

6.9.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing services required by this Agreement, and compliance with all reasonable performance standards established by City.

6.9.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance and Social Security.
5116863. l- [23 5.0

248

6.9.4 Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City and all other related entities, officers, employees and representatives from any liability, damages, claims, costs, and expenses of any nature arising from alleged violations of personnel practices or of any acts of omissions by Consultant in connection with the work performed arising from tl'iis Agreement.

6.10 Copyright. No reports, maps or other documents produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be the subject of an application for copyright by or on behalf of Consultant.

6.11 Legal Construction.

6.11.1 This Agreement is made and entered into in the State of California and shall in all respects be interpreted, enforced, and govemed under the laws of the State of Califomia without regard to conflict of law principles.

6.11.2 This Agreement shall be construed without regard to the identity of the persons who drafted its various provisions. Each and every provision of this Agreement shall be conmued as though each of the parties participated equally in the drafting of same, and any rule of construction that a document is to be constnued against the drafting party shall not be applicable to this Agreement.

6.11.3. The article and section, captions and headings herein have been inserted for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of interpretation or construction.

6.11.4. Whenever in this Agreement the context may so require, the masculine gender shall be deemed to refer to and include the feminine and neuter, and the singidar shall refer to and include the plural.

6.12 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts and, as so executed, shall constitute an agreement which shall be binding upon all Parties hereto.

6.13 Final Payment Acceptance Constitutes Release. The acceptance by Consultant of the final payment made under this Agreement shall operate as and be a release of City from all claims and liabilities for compensation to Consultant for anything done, fumished, or relating to Consultant's work or services. Acceptance of payment shall be any negotiation of City's check or the failure to make a written extra compensation claim within ten (10) calendar days of the receipt of that check. However, approval or payment by City shall not constitute, nor be deemed, a release of the responsibility and liability of Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents for the accuracy and competency of tlie infori'nation provided and/or work perfori'iied; nor shall such approval or payment be deemed to be an assumption of such responsibility or liability by City for any defect or error in the work prepared by Consultant, its employees, sub-consultants and agents.

6.14 Corrections. In addition to the above indemnification obligations, Consultant shall correct, at its expense, all errors in the work which may be disclosed during City's review of Consultant's report or plans. Should Consultant fail to make such correction in a 51168611- L235.0

249
reasonably, timely manner, such correction shall be made by City, and the cost thereof shall be charged to Consultant.

6.15 Files. All files of Consultant pertaining to City shall be and remain the property of City.

Consultant will control the physical location of such files during the term of this Agreement and sliall be entitled to retain copies of such files upon termination of this Agreement.

6.16 Waiver; Remedies Cumulative. Failure by a Party to insist upon the performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party, irrespective of tlie lengtli of time for whicli such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver of such Party's right to demand compliance by such other Party in the future. No waiver by a Party of a default or breach of the other party shall be effective or binding upon such a Party unless made in writing by such Party, and no such waiver shall be implied from any omissions by a Party to take any action with respect to such default or breach. No express written waiver of a specified default or breach shall affect any other default or breach, or cover any other period of time, other than any default or breach and/or period of time specified. All of the remedies permitted or available to a Party under this Agreement, or at law or in equity, shall be cumulative and alternative, and invocation of any such right or remedy shall not constitute a waiver or election of remedies with respect to any other permitted or available right of remedy.

6.17 Mitigation of Damages. In all such situations arising out of this Agreement, the Parties shall attempt to avoid and minimize the damages resulting from the conduct of the other Party.

6.18 Severability. If any provision in this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way.

6.19 Attorneys' Fees. The Parties hereto acknowledge and agree that each will bear his or its own costs, expenses and attomeys' fees arising out of and/or connected with the riegotiation, drafting and execution of the Agreement, and all matters arising out of or connected therewith except that, in the event any action is brought by any Party hereto to enforce this Agreement, the prevailing Party in such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and costs in addition to all other relief to which that Party or those Parties may be entitled.

6.20 Entire Agreement and Amendments. This Agreement constitutes the whole agreement between City and Consultant, and neither party has made any representations to the other except as expressly contained herein. Neither party, in executing or performing this Agreement, is relying upon any statement or information not contained in this Agreemcnt.

Any amendments, changes or modifications to this Agreement must be madc in writing and appropriately executed by both City and Consultant.

6.21 Notices. Any iotice required to be given hereunder shall be deemed to have been given by email transmission with confirmation of delivery and depositing said notice in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:
51i6863.1-L235.0

250
TO CITY:

City of South Gate
Arturo Cervantes, P.E.

Assistant City Manager/Director of Public Works
8650 Califomia Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Email: acervaxites(20sogate.org
TEL: (323) 563-9512
TO CONSULT ANT:

Chris Rideout, PE
Vice President
BKF Engineers
4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 400
Newport Beach CA 92660
Email: crideorit(mbkf.com
(949) 526-8462
WITH COURTESY COPY TO:

City Clerk's Office
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
8650 Califomia Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
Email: cavalos(4sogate.org
TEL: (323) 563-9510

6.22 Warranty of Authorized Signatories. Each of the signatories hereto warrants and represents that he or she is competent and authorized to enter into this Agreement on behalf of the Party for whom he or she purports to sign.

6.23 Consultation with Attorney. Consultant warrants and represents that it has consulted with an attorney or knowingly and voluntarily decided to forgo such a consultation.

6.24 Interpretation Against Drafting Party. City and Consultant agree that they have cooperated in the review and drafting of this agreement. Accordingly, in the event of any ambiguity, neither Party may claim that the interpretation of this Agreement shall be constnied against either Party solely because that Party drafted all or a portion of this Agreement, or the clause at issue.

7. EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this Agreement is November 23, 2021, and will remain in effect through and rintil project completion, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the tenns of this Agreement.
[Remainder of page left blank intentionally.]
5H6863.1-L235.0

513/
251
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

CITY OF SOUTH GATE:

B7:

AI Rios'; Mayor
Dated: /;1-/7'-4021
ATTEST:

Carmen Avalos, City Cl
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
t
Salinas, City Attorney
BKF ENGINEERS:

BY:

Dated:
/,lru)-2,)
5116863.1-L235.0

252
m
m
o
o
c
I
253

CITY OF SOUTH GATE
CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACING PROJECT, PHASE I & It CITY PROJECT N0. 662-ST

TABLE OF CONTENTS

COVER LETTER

QUALIFICATION AND EXPERIENCE
Firm Profile
Organization Chart & Availability Chart
Similar Project Experience with References
Quality Assurance / Quality Control Procedures

SCOPE OF WORK
Project Understanding & Approach
Scope of Work
Preliminary Project Schedule

APPENDICES
Key Personnel Resumes
7 9
10 ALTURA PAVEMENT PROJECT COUNTRY HILLS PAVEMENT LAKELAND PAVESIENT WILLOW STREET PAVEMENT 5! 254

COVER LETTER
September 22, 2021
City Clerk's Office
Kenneth Tang, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
City of South Gate
8650 California Avenue
South Gate, CA 90280
SUBJECT: Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I and II, City Project No. 662-ST Dear Kenneth,
BKF Engineers (BKF) welcomes the opportunity to submit our proposal for the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I and II for the City of South Gate. We understand the City is seeking a professional consultant to provide design services including preliminary engineering, surveying, engineering design, PS&E and assistance during the construction bidding phase. BKF Engineers has several pavement projects, of which most have been constructed or under construction. BKF is ranked in the ENR Top Design Firms in 2020, and for over 100+ years we have earned a reputation for balancing City goals and community needs. We understand that construction budget is finite, and we have collaborated and coordinated with cities, like Santa Fe Springs, Buena Park, and Brea to ensure the City's goals and construction budgets are met for the pavement rehabilitation and street improvement projects.

SIMILAR PROJECT EXPERIENCE. Recent similar BKF projects include, City of Long Beach Willow Street Pavement Project, City of Santa Fe Springs North Residential Street Pavement Rehabilitation and Lakeland Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Brea Country Hills Subdivision Pavement Rehabilitation and Water Improvement, City of Buena Park Altura Pavement Rehabilitation, and Rosecrans Pavement Rehabilitation, City of Downey Lakewood/Florence Intersection Improvement, and City of Pico Rivera Regional Bikeway Project. Our proposal under Qualifications and Experience provide a thorough project description for the aforementioned projects with our references. We encourage the City of South Gate to review our firm's experience and contact our references as confirmation of our commitment and excellent customer service.

PROJECT MANAGER. To show our commitment to the City, we have dedicated Ms. Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD/P as the project manager for the duration of our contract. She brings more than 20 years of experience in roadway widenings, pavement rehabilitations, utility relocations and intersection improvements. Sheila is currently managing similar type projects, as mentioned above, that are either in final design, in construction or have successfully completed construction within this year.

As Principal/Vice President of BKF I am an authorized principal who can make legally binding commitments on behalf of the company. I am available to expand on any portion of our proposal and answer any further questions you may have. Please feel free to contact me for all correspondence during the selection process at (949) 526-8462 or via email at [email protected].

We look forward to working with the City of South Gate.

Sincerely,

BKF NGINEERS
C - Rideout, PE
Principal/\/ice President
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD/P
Senior Project Manager
City of South Gate I Citywide Residential ResurFacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST BKF ENGINEERS 51 255

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
BKF Engineers
Delivering Inspired Infrastructure for
over 100 years
Since 1915, BKF Engineers has built a reputation on
the ability to plan, design, survey, and successfully implement complex projects. We draw upon and utilize our experience guiding projects from the inception and feasibility stages through construction to develop designs that identify physical constraints, potential risks, and value engineering alternatives; resulting in projects that exceed expectations.

Through our network of 15 offices in California, BKF provides civil engineering, land surveying, and
land planning services for government agencies,
institutions, developers, architects, contractors, school districts, and corporations.

BKF's decades of engineering, surveying, and planning have produced some of the most recognized projects
in California. By combining our years of experience in diverse markets with new, innovative appi-oaches to problem solving, we have grown to more than 450
experienced staff.

SERVICES
Water Resources
Civil Engineering
a Surveying
ffl Planning
ffl Sustainability
Transportation
a Construction Management
Utility Locating

SIMILAR PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Altura Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Buena Park, CA Country Hills Pavement Rehab & Water Connection, Brea, CA Willow Street Pavement Project, Long Beach, CA
Bartley Avenue Street Improvements, Santa Fe Springs, CA - North Residential Street Pavement Improvement, Santa Fe Springs, CA Rosecrans Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Buena Park, CA Lakeland Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Santa Fe Springs, CA Foster Road Side Panel Project, Norwalk, CA
City of South Gate I Citywide Residential ResurFacing,
Phase I & II, City Proiect No. 662-ST 1 BKF ENGINEERS
256

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

ORGANIZATION CHART
The organization chart presented below displays our proposed team organization, depth of resources, and coordination between team members. By assigning seasoned engineers and surveyors, BKF will assure a thorough work product, a cross-pollination of design expertise, and effective management of the project as necessary.
.s0 Key Personnel
,0 Chris Rideout, PE
Principal in Charge

BKF ENGINEERS
,0 Saeed Kerayehchian, PE
QA/QC Engineer

BKF ENGINEERS
,0Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD/P
Project Manager

BKF ENGINEERS
Hooman Jalaie, EIT
Sr. Project Engineer

BKF ENGINEERS
Tony Ye, EIT
Project Engineer

BKF ENGINEERS
,J) Davis Thresh, PLS
Survey Manager

BKF ENGINEERS
J) RogerSchlierkamp, MSc, PE
Pavement Engineer
GMU
TEAM ALLOCATION + AVAILABILITY

KEY STAFF ASSIGNED

PERCENTAGE OF

CURRENT WORKLOAD

COMMITMENT TO

SOUTH GATE
Chris Rideout, PE
Principal in Charge
Sheila Amparo, PE, QSD/P
Project Manager
Saeed Kerayehchian, PE, PTOE
QA/QC Engineer
Davis Thresh, PLS
Survey Manager
Jamboree/Main Intersection Improv.

GSA #4 Real Property Services
Pico Rivera Bikeway Project
Jamboree/Main Intersection Improv.

GSA #4 Real Property Services
Pico Rivera Bikeway Project
Lakewood/Rorence Intersection Improv.

Herndon Avenue Widening
Monte Rio Bridge Replacement
Mount Vernon Viaduct PM/CM
McKinley Grade Separation
SDSU Aztec Stadium
35 %
55 %
20 %
30 %
Roger Schlierkamp, PE
Sr. Pavement Engineer
Mission Viejo 2021 Residential Streets Slurry
Seal, Construction Observation/Testing
City of Irvine Pavement Evaluations
Harbor Blvd, Frontera st., & Nohl Ranch Rd
40 %
City of South Gate i Citywide Residential ResurFacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST 2
Q
BKF ENGINEERS Affl)
257

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
Noe Negrete, PE
Director of Public Works
11710 E. Telegraph Road
Santa Fe Springs
CA 90670
Ph. (562) 455-5680
noenegrete@
santafesprings.org
LAKELAND ROAD PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT, Santa Fe Springs, CA BKF Engineers is working with the City of Santa Fe
Springs to provide design services for the street
improvementsalongLakeland Road.Theintersedion
of Lakeland and Shoemaker is controlled by a traffic signal. The existing traffic loops for the westbound
direction will be impacted and will need to be re-
established by the Project. The middle portion of
this block, near the ISA Business Center, shows pavement distress with patching of potholes being common in this area. There are stretches along Lakeland there are no sidewalks, for example, nearl3000 Lakeland a 70 foot decomposed granite meandering walk could be replaced with new sidewalk to get it up to City standards. Some of the existing sidewalk panels are raised and will be incorporated into the improvement plans. Existing ramps at Shoemaker, Laurel, and Carmenita are non-compliant and will be upgraded by the Project. With the Lakeland Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project being the third pavement project with the City, BKF has established a streamline process with the City to meet the tight design schedule and stay within the limited design budget.

We worked pro-actively with the City from the onset. BKF's first order of work was to conduct a site visit with the City to mutually agree which portions of pavement, curb and guti:er, sidewalk, curb ramps, cross gutters, and driveways that needed to be removed and rep1aced. These limits were marked on the curb and surveyed by BKF's survey team. Improvement plans, specifications, and construction cost estimates were developed and submitted for approval.

BKF applied best practices from the Bartley Avenue Rehabilitation Project and the North Residential Street Improvements Project to Lakeland Road Pavement Rehabilitation Project. Such instances included consideration of using the method of full depth redamation to expedite the construction schedule. This project was completed as part of BKF's On-Call contract with the City.

REFERENCE
ROSECRANS AVE. & ALTURA BLVD. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT, Buena Park, CA As part of the City of Buena Park's pavement
rehabilitation program, the City identified segments of Rosecrans Avenue & Altura Boulevard as
part of the 2020 construction cycle. The Project
improvements included pavement rehabilitation,
curb, guttei; cross gutter and sidewalk replacement
and the installation of ADA compliant curb ramps.

With the flat grades and pavement deterioration,
localized areas of ponding are prevalent, which
causes nuisances, and pavement damage. Unlike
many pavement rehabilitation projects, Rosecrans
had minimal flatwork replacement needs. In this
area, Rosecrans had a longitudinal slope sufficient
to not allow for ponding which in turn would lead to isolated flatwork/pavement failures. The landscape area are at the back of the sidewalk with large trees and tree roots damaging segments of sidewalk. The Project included localized sidewalk repair and tree root barriers.

City of South Gate l Citywide Residential ResurFacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST 3

REFERENCE
Teddy Luong, PE
ASSistant Engineer
6650 Beach Blvd.

Buena Park CA 90622
Ph. (714) 562-3689
[email protected]
BKF ENGINEERS !l
258

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
Noe Negrete, PE
Public Works Director
11710 E. Telegraph Road
Santa Fe Springs
CA 90670
Ph. (562) 455-5680
noenegrete@
santafesprings.org
NORTH RESIDENTIAL STREET PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENT, Santa Fe Springs, CA The construction of BKF's pavement rehabilitation
project along Terradell Street, Whiteland Street,
Roma Street and Nova Street in the City of Santa
Fe Springs are part of the on-going Pavement
Management Program the City uses to prioritize
and fund roadway maintenance. In order to meet
the tight design schedule and stay within the limited design budget, BKF worked pro-actively with the City from the onset. BKF's first order of work was to conduct a site visit with the City to mutually agree which portions of pavement, curb and gutter; sidewalk, curb ramps, cross gutters, and driveways would need to be removed and replaced. These limits were marked on the curb and surveyed by BKF's survey team. Improvement plans, specifications, and construction cost estimates were developed and submitted for approval. In addition, BKF applied best practices from the Bartley Avenue Rehabilitation Project to the North Residential Street Improvements Project.

Such instances included consideration to using the method of full depth reclamation to expedite the construction schedule.

REFERENCE
PICO RIVERA REGIONAL BIKEWAY, Pico Rivera, CA
BKF Engineers is leading the civil design for the Pico Rivera Bikeway Project, a1.5-mile bicyde facility that will add a connection over the San Gabriel River. The project indudes a Class I bike path along Mines Ave. from the Rio Hondo Channel to the San Gabriel
River, a new bridge structure located north of Mines Ave. spanning the San Gabriel River and Class I and
II bike lanes along Dunlap Crossing Rd. from the San Gabriel River to Norwalk Blvd. The alignment will connect an existing publicly accessible bike path to the San Gabriel River Mid hail. Additionally, there is a completestreetsimprovementalong MinesAvenuefromtheRioHondoChannel to the San Gabriel River. The improvements on Mines Ave. include but are not limited to: pavement reconstruction; installation of bioswales; reconfiguration of parking lanes; upgrading street lights; traffic signal modifications at Rosemead Blvd and Mines Ave; and landscaping.

COUNTRY HILLS PAVEMENT REHABILiTATION & WATER CONNECTION, BKF Engineers is the consultant for the City of Brea
selected for the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate (PS&E) for the pavement rehabilitation
and water main improvements at Country
Hills Subdivision. The Country Hills Subdivision
experienced multiple water breakage and pavement
failures due to the 60-year old water mains that
were corroded. The BKF Team tested the soil for
corrosivity to ensure the proper pipe materials were used forthe replaced water main lines. Additionally, the Project rehabilitated the pavement, upgraded curb ramps to be ADA-compliant, and replaced sidewalk. BKF provided general civil and surveying services, including utility coordination.

REFERENCE
Kenner Guerrero
Assistant Engineer
6615 Passons Blvd.

Pico Rivera CA 90660
Ph. (562) 801-4351
[email protected]
Brea, CA

REFERENCE
Raymond Contreras, PE
Associate Engineer
1Civic Center Cirde
Brea CA 92821
Ph. (714) 671-4411
[email protected]
City of South Gate l Citywide Residential Resurfacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST 4 BKF ENGINEERS fl
AfflJ
l,,')
259

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE
WILLOW STREET PAVEMENT PROJECT, Long Beach, CA
As part of our On-Call contract, BKF Engineers
prepared and submitted the construction
documents to the City if Long Beach for the
pavement rehabilitation of Willow Street between
San Vincente Street and Studebaker Road. Scope
of Services include providing design services such
as project management, research and field reviews,
utility base mapping, plan preparations, and cost
estimates. BKF is also providing bid and construction support services.

FOSTER ROAD SIDE PANEL PROJECT, Norwalk, CA
The Foster Road Side Panel project replaces a
60-year old damaged asphalt side panels used
by students, bicydists and residents. The City of
Norwalk proposed a plan to make improvements to
minimize future accidents. This ATP funded projed
is being designed with a new meandering pathway
incorporated into existing side panels between
Foster Road and the frontage road to minimize
accidents involving motor vehicles and pedestrians/bicyclists. Early on, in the conceptual phase, BKF evalbiated the existing curb-to-curb dimensions, and presented to the City an opportunity to employ a "Road Diet:' By reducing unnecessary travel lanes, a new Class II bike lane and a two-way left turn lane are being introduced along the Foster Road corridor between Pioneer Avenue and Studebaker Road, while not impacting the existing on-street parking. BKF is leading the design team in incorporating new drainage facilities, pedestrian safety lighting, and drought tolerant landscaping. Once improvements are completed, Foster Road will provide a safer and more convenient pathway for students, bicydists and residents.

REFERENCE
Thana Sathees, PE, QSD
Civil Engineer
411 W. Ocean Boulevard
Long Beach CA 90802
Ph. (562) 570-7513
thana.sathees@
longbeach.gov

REFERENCE
Bill Zimmerman, PE
Former Acting
City Engineer
12700 Norwalk Blvd.,
Norwalk CA 90650
Ph. (714) 412-1597
[email protected]
GMU PROJECT +

REFERENCE
Noe Negrete, PE
Public Works Director
11710 E. Telegraph Road
Santa Fe Springs
CA 90670
Ph. (562) 455-5680
noenegrete@
santafesprings.org
"SOUTH RESIDENTIAL 1" PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT, Santa Fe Springs, CA GMU performed a pavement evaluation and
developed pavement repair recommendations for
various asphalt concrete (AC) roadway segments
located within City of Santa Fe Springs, specifically, Gridley Road (Darcy Street to Longworth Avenue),
Dunning Street (Longworth Avenue to cul-de-sac),
Darcy Street (Orr and Day Road to cul-de-sac),
and Harvest Avenue (Darcy Street to Longworth
Avenue). Scope of services included performing a pavement surface condition assessment, field exploration (AC corings), laboratory testing, pavement thickness analysis, and development of pavement repair recommendations. The existing roadway segments are generally in poor condition. Multiple pavement repair recommendations were provided, including conventional remove-and- replace reconstruction as well as full-depth redamation with cement treatment (FDR-C). During construction, GMU performed cement stabilized pulverized base (CSPB) mix design testing services.

City of South Gate i Citywide Residential Resufacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST 5 BKF ENGINEERS !l (,,'f260

QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
BKF will dedicate a member of staff not directly related to the project as the Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Manager. This member of staff's key role is to assure the Quality Control procedures delineated below are closely followed and the procedure documented.

LEVEL 1: INTERNAL REVIEW - EACH DISCIPLINE IS REQUIRED TO CONDUCT AN INTERNAL REVIEW PERFORMED PRIOR TO EACH MILESTONE SUBMITTAL.

A senior staff member at the firm, other than on the design team, shall review the documents prepared by the design team. This review will require that all items on the documents be highlighted in yellow indicating the review has occurred and there are no exceptions to the document. This process is for the entire document (i.e. north arrows, station call-outs, profile grid designation, etc.). a If the reviewer identifies an item on the document that is not correct, then it is marked in red. If the reviewer has comments for clarifications, then it is marked in green. - After the review is complete, the document is returned to the design team with a signature (documentation) indicating the review is complete.
a The design team will review and address all items in red and meet with the reviewer on the items in green until a clarification allows for the reviewer to yellow the item, or a red mark is added. a The design team will then resolve the red marks and return the reviewers original markup along with a clean print. The reviewer will document the comments that have been addressed by yellowing outthe origina! red mark and placing yellow on the clean set, and signing the document, LEVEL 2: INTER-DISC!PLli%lAR'r' REVIEW - THiS REVIE-W IS I'O COTh-iFlRM rH)\r Ti-lER[ A.RE NO INTER-DiSCIP LINARY C ON)"'LIC"t-S ,/-!iThoil) C)CCl)t?S Al" 'r I"IE '-)O'/O", 95'>o" A!'ID I 00% FlilAL SUBMI1-l-A'- MILES'TONES.
a All disciplines provide their plans to BKF for collation. BKF will assemble the sets and distribute to the design team.
a Each discipline will review the others and similar to the process delineated in Level 1 above, marking in yellow, red, or green, and return to BKF for collation. - A meeting will be held with all the disciplines in attendance, and the documents with all red or green comments will be discussed and resolved between disciplines. - The resolutions will be marked in red and returned to the designer forincorporation as described above in the Level1 procedure.

The QA/QC Manager will review the review documents to ensure the Level 1 and Level 2 procedures have been met by all team members and will document their findings.

CONCEPTUAL
€ 50%SUBMITTAL t, 95%SUBM1TTAL t
100% BID REA[)Y
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS 1 QA/QC protocol established at project initiation 2 QA/QC maintained/docuinented tiyoughout project lifespan LEVEL 2 QUALITY CONTROL

INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW
1 2
3 4
Each consultant condricts interdisciplinary review
Team shares comments
Taam reioMliq mii$lpal
Incoro*ra% r*i*lvgal semmants
City of South Gate l Citywide Residential ResurFacing, Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST 6 BKF ENGINEERS
261

SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT UNDERSTANDING

INTRODUCTION
The City of South Gate, has secured funding for the design and construction of the Citywide Residential Resurfacing Project, Phase I and Phase 11, City Project No. 662-ST with SB-1 and local funds to rehabilitate the pavement, upgrade the curb ramps to ADA-compliant ramps, localized sidewalk, driveway approaches, curb and gutter removal and replacement within the Phases 1 through 3 Streets. The Project also includes the relocation of existing facilities, such as fences, mailboxes, trees, and implementation of air and water quality improvements, green streets technologies, such as bioswales with drought-tolerant landscape, Filterra systems or porous paving that capture and filter stormwater.

PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
EXISTING C.ONDlr'lOf-15
Based on our visual assessment of the pavement conditions during our site walk through the street identified within the three Phases, the pavement conditions within the City varied from very poor condition to fair condition. Several streets within Phase 2 and the segment along California Avenue have concrete paved parking aisles on both sides of the street. The concrete pavement segments are in fairly good conditions that may be protected in place. There are concrete segments that are cracked and damaged, that we recommend to locally remove and replace in order to support the expected life span of the rehabilitated pavement. Due to the variations on the pavement conditions, there may be several pavement recommendations to be provided to the City.

APPROACH - CONCEP'rUAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT
Similarly to our projects in the Cities
of Santa Fe Springs, Buena Park, and
Brea, we invite the City of South Gate
to join the BKF Team to perform the
site walk, where the City staff and our
team can walk the streets, identify
the locations requiring removal and
replacement of sidewalk, curb, gutter,
ramps, and cross gutters, by spray
painting the limits.

BKF Surveyors can capture the
locations, and we can map in
AutoCADD to implement in the
construction documents. With all the information from our site walk, we will prepare an exhibit depicting the course of action for each segment of the streets, and the limits of improvements, submit to the City for review and approval prior to proceeding to 50% Design. We will also include in the exhibit photos of areas that are in question and will need further review from the City as to the course of action.

City of South Gate l Citywide Residential ResurFacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST 7 BKF ENGINEERS R
Affll
l,,(P262

SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
With the allotted design and construction budget of $3.18 Million, and over 10 miles of roadway, we need to be strategic in identifying the limits of improvements and pavement rehabilitation approaches. The BKF Team will provide three pavement rehabilitation alternatives, with one being that we suggest the life span of the pavement be reduced to10 years. We will prepare an exhibit with pavement recommendations and the cost associated with the alternatives. The strategies that we would like to expound on with the City to satisfy the City's goals, objectives, and stay within budget, include:

Performing localized AC repairs (to
address areas of high-severity load-related
distresses such as alligator cracking,
potholes, depression)
Performing edge milling (to join AC overlay
into edge of gutter)
Paving1.0-1.5" thick AC leveling course -
to smooth out the roadway as it will likely
disintegrate during milling, preferably with
a fiber-reinforced AC mix to the mixture's
tensile strength and reduce reflective
cracking potential
Installing pavement interlayer system
(ARAM, fabric, Glasgrid, or GlasPave)
Constructing 2-3" AC overlay (with
fibers again)
This strategy assumes the subgrade is relatively strong and sufficient AC thickness exists to mill.

By working with the City on the pavement rehabilitation approaches and limits ofimprovements, our team can better understand the City's preferred areas of improvement and address their major concerns. With the City-approved course of action, design documents that will be submitted at the 50% milestone to the City will be in alignment with their expectations, and within the construction budget allotted for the Project. . a'i;a@l
Nfflb :s ":% _,, ,,, E 't. at
=, p_ i ,
-... W ,I-flJ ,
I - 'W - - ' - -" j (J_ffi'aa=aa___ '-l i
t"aa-jjjj
!"
_'-" -":.-) .a !
,.; .-' ML
'ar'
am' -+a" '
'
la'"l I -- r

EXISTING UTILITIES/FACILITIES
Several utilities were observed, such as maintenance holes, valves and water meters that would need to be raised to the new pavement grades. Our Team has preliminarily identified the types of utilities that will need to be adjusted to grade and, if special attention is required, we will include the required work on the plans for the Contractor. Other utilities observed during our site visit include:

Los Angeles County Sewer
Los Angeles Storm Drain
Southern California Gas
Overhead electrical and communication
Water Lines
We will locate traffic loops impacted by the pavement improvements, and include the replacements of the traffic loops on the construction daocuments. There are several ways we have included the traffic loops improvements on the construction documents. We will discuss with the City these several methods and confirm which method they prefer.

City of South Gate l Citywide Residential Resurfacing,
Phase I & 11, City Project No. 662-ST 8 BKF ENGINEERS (,,1
263

SCOPE OF WORK AND PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
While the BKF Team understands that the scope of the RFP, we would like to propose methods we have used on pavement projects that may be a great cost-savings to the City. As an example, the City would like to have supplemental survey to obtain cross slopes for the sections of the roadbed. We propose for topographic survey (at 20-scale) to only be used in areas where the streets will not change the crown and grade of the existing pavement. The cross slopes in grind and overlay or slurry seal treated areas will not be modified. This alone is a great cost savings to the City.

We would also propose for corings to be performed in certain streets. Adding the corings may increase the cost to the City in design, but by obtaining the structural pavement profile, our Team will better provide a recommendation for the pavement treatment that will yield a longer life cycle of the pavement. The longevity of the pavement will be a greater cost savings compared to the initial cost of the corings.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
As part of the Request for Proposal, the City has provided a detailed Scope of Services in the RFP. Therefore, in an effort to eliminate lengthy repetitions, we will address the Scope of Services as follows:

If the City Scope of Services is consistent with our approach and needs for a specific task, we will simply state: "No exceptions to the Scope of Services" If BKF believes that in order deliver the Project there are additions, suggested modifications or clarifications, or deletions to the City's Scope of Services we provided the foltowing section of this proposal.

Below is our concurrence or deviation from the Scope of Services provided by the City TASK 5 Plan Preparation No exceptions to the Scope of Services TASK 6 Cost Estimates No exceptions to the Scope of Services TASK12 Prepare Record Drawings
(As-Builts) No exceptions to the Scope of Services
City of South Gate l Citywide Residential ResurFacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST 9 BKF ENGINEERS - 264

PROJECT SCHEDULE
CITY OF SOUTH GATE CITYWIDE RESIDENTIAL RESURFACmG PROJECT, PHASF, I AND n, CITY PROJECT NO. 662-ST r..l N## I owai-ai i iiaai I Paffl* "% I ri I o I t I P I :"f' "a I xr I r : t I A I !:" "l "o i ii I 0 <mCO;lTKoRA,:::Al:/EXECUTION =l*da: TTIeelOl/1,1://2211 MTuoenllOl/,1://22:
' KICK-OFFAEmnNG Odivs )i(on )1/IS/21 Aion 11/IS/21 "'l' t-V"mtto"fi";a ',ronvp,amo5,i_,1_- o& -m't fifmtnxnVTh ff Th I'- t-ffl l')% tmY A f v- n I-V vvt -I & -'-V - --'- " "" "" " """ ' "" " ""' I
ff
4 11111
@1171
-!"="g=-.'u'F"a;"",:'=i'-":'==""' :::a'I I:"::',::',:: ".":X':l- ===q 'aE:J:i;E',",'i,E\':m"" ":,:; E:":':;:fi -3?EE;Hl: r m T',:i,:::W=;,H:',:"'::::o" :',:: .H:,':;::,: :::,::;::
3=:i:ilH.:E€,,;:;:.r;:=y=-= s:';&n T,II3W.;iW :,hH:;HE =-=-==-=-=-=-===-------- =-= =-=- =-=-=- i PavemenrTieamient Recommendation Concepnial Exhiliit/Lisr 2 vks Tuc 11/30/2t Alon 12/13/21 WTt<=-ri<:=f';:-='==a==='-= - li: fJIfi:Iil '1;i::iit' Sulimit to City for Review O dayi Wed 2/2/_') Wed :!/2/_" H-'=.==.i.$fi:=-=-=-=---------- -=J=:i =;'i:ii:: :fi:i:ii:

M Incoipiiraie QC Commen(s 3 ax)'s Tue 3/_"/22 aniu 3/24/22 "J Suhmir to Ci7 for Bidding o dryt Fii .i/25/_" Fri 3/25/22 ______j CkyRt'vicvPcnod 2wlt Alon3/28/22 F6-+/s/=
l)
I Task !i-7 - Prepare 100% PS&E Bid-Ready Documents )!O days Mon 4/It/22 Pn 5/6/22 _ ,' (Package 1 and Package 2 concumnt)
" PicpaglO)'/oPS&fi 3wks Mon4/11/_" Fri4/29/_"
? :'::.,:.:.':%::,. ::: ::::::H ;,::::H
"1 !%ihminti(4forBidding Odays Fn5/6/fj %S/6/)_a'
"1 Task 8 - Respond to Requests for Information and Submittals 134 days Mon S/9/22 Thu 12/U22 2I1 Ci7.ldveniiePioeci 30days Mon5/9/22 A7:/z2:'/;i" Ilid Opming l day )ilon 6/:'0/_') ll
g. cpfflonc+raocn:zawa.lm0nziA=,eeaiehn;on i day Tue6/21/_a" Tue6/21/_"l "'a' ""-'-" ":i€:aJ .EEE==...............,,.., =-a: ,...=,;:;E ,:- il
"'l
ff
@lll
iffi
S
r
"v,
'i 'l
=, . . ii I
4 Lta!ND Tab !ll 8umnuuy ' I%$d0rllvmffi nnii.i 1 p PHna Iljlamna * %%'lsimnq chlllmiw Ilbnualmuy
The 121
City of Redondo Beach l Kingsdale Avenue Resurfacing
Design Services from 182nd Street to Grant Avenue 10 BKF ENGINEERS !W 265

APPENDICES

KEY PERSONNEL RESUME

REGISTRATION
Pr6fessienal"Civil
Engineer, C:A No.
44922

AFFILIATIONS
American Public
Works Association -
Membtfr
TOTAL.YE.ARS

EXPERIENCE
34 years, 17 #ith BKF

CHRIS RIDEOUT, PE

PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Chris has more than 34 years of project management/design experience on numerous streetscape, roadway, utility infrastructure, and municipal improvement projects. He has been able to develop strong relationships with the local and regional approval agencies throughout his career, which helps with obtaining timely jurisdictional approvals. His strengths include providing creative alternatives with a maximum amount of flexibility during the design, while maintaining the project objectives and schedule.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
North Residential Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Santa Fe Springs, CA - Project manager leading the design team in incorporating new drainage facilities, pedestrian safety lighting and drought tolerant landscaping - Met with Santa Fe Springs residents to incorporate concerns into design as well as construction
- On-Call project and is part of the new on-going pavement management program the city uses to prioritize and fund roadway maintenance - Coordinated construction activities with both the Contractor and City representatives including traffic control and detour determination Bartley Avenue Rehabilitation Project, Santa Fe Springs, CA - Project manager leading the design team in incorporating new drainage facilities, pedestrian safety lighting and drought tolerant landscaping - On-Call project and is part of the new on-going pavement management program the city uses to prioritize and fund roadway maintenance - Coordinated construction activities with both the Contrador and City Representatives including traffic control and detour determination Foster Road Side Panels Project, Norwalk, CA
- Presented and evaluated the opportunity to employ a "Road Diet" to Foster Road between Pioneer Avenue and Studebaker Road - Led the design team in incorporating new drainage facilities incorporating LID standards, lighting, and new landscaping
- Developed side panel geometry and roadway striping modification for Road-Diet
- Led the coordination/relocation with third party utilities, including SCE street light, Frontier down guy relocation, and water line reconnection for irrigation - Project executive for the design team in incorporating new drainage facilities, pedestrian safety light, and drought tolerant landscaping - Prepared PS&E submittal package
Lakewood/Florence Intersection Improvement Project, Downey, CA - Developed numerous geometric alternatives
- Project Manager leading a multi-discipline team
- Refined Right of way acquisition needs
- Coordinated with utility companies
City of South Gate I Citywide Residential Resufacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST BKF ENGINEERS !l 10 266

APPENDICES
,/ I, l
.i"/'i/lilAi'sl

EDUCATION
B.S., Civil :Engirieer:ing,
Ur;iversity, iF!orriena
'REGISTRATION
Profes'sional 'Civil
Engineer, CA No.
78003

AFFILIATIONS
Qualified SWPPP
D,eveloper(QSp).&
Prad:itioner(QSP.)
'CA No..26297

TOTALYEARS

EXPERIENCE
21 years, 7.with BKF

SHEILA AMPARO, PE, QSD/P

PROJECT MANAGER
Sheila has more than 20 years of civil engineering experience in roadway design, grading, and highway/bridge projects with mcinicipal agencies, as the project engineei; design manager, and project manager. Sheila has led the design efforts for roadway geometrics, grading, signing and striping, stage construction and traffic handling on a number of large transportation projects and cinderstands the importance of strong, clear communication when it comes to meeting project goals to ensure timely and accurate execution of project deliverables. She will oversee all the geometric design, and ensure that coordination among the team members are consistent and clear.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Rosecrans & Altura Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Buena Park, CA - Project Manager for the pavement rehabilitation project - Scope included curb, gutter, cross gutter and sidewalk replacement - Replacement of ADA compliant curb ramps
- Led review meetings with city staff and design team - Coordinated project design with city staff and subconsultants - Coordinated/prepared pavement rehabilitation alternatives with associated costs
Street Improvement Project - Lakeland Road, Santa Fe Springs, CA - Project manager leading the design team in implementing pavement recommendation, sidewalk, curb and gutter replacement - Met with City staff and maintenance crew to identify limits of improvements and scope of construction work
- Prepared and submitted construction bid documents
- Provided support during bidding process
Country Hills Pavement Rehabilitation & Water Connection, Brea, CA - Preparation of plans, specifications, and estimate for the pavement rehabilitation and water main improvements
- Tested soil for corrosivity to ensure the proper pipe materials were cised for the replaced water main lines
- Project rehabilitated the pavements, unpgraded curb ramps to be ADA compliant, and replaced sidewalk
- Provided general civil and surveying services & utility coordination Foster Road Side Panel, Norwalk, CA
- Project engineer for geometric alignments alternatives - Led coordination efforts with design team
- Developed side panel geometry and roadway striping modification for Road-Diet
- Civil team leader for design and coordination with sub-consultants - Generated utility composite plan and identified utility relocation needs - Developed stage construction concept to minimize impact to public - Prepared PS&E submittal Package
City of South Gate I Citywide Residential ResurFacing,
Phase I & II, City Proiect No. 662-ST BKF ENGINEERS !I
-'7l267

APPENDICES
'M:S., Transpoirtatign
Enqiineerir3g,.Azad
Uriiversity ofTe!'irari
a-'s-t civil Engineering,
Mashhad
REGISTRAT!ON
Professional Civil
Enginqer, C:A No.,
89422
Profer;sional Traffic
Qperations Engineer,
No,47:10

TOTAL YEARS
EXPERiENCE
10 yearG,.1 with BKF

SAEED KERAYEHCHIAN, PE, PTOE

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL ENGINEER
Saeed has more than 10 years of project experience in Transportation Engineering and Land Development Projects including Advanced Urban/ Rurak Roadway Corridor and Intersection Modeling, Grading, Drainage, and Stormwater Drainage. Saeed has made significant contributions in developing transportation strategies and solutionstoa widevarietyofland-use projects and urban street improvement projects (included bike/pedestrian improvements, roadway widenings, and intersedion improvements) from early decision- making in the conceptual and functional design stages to detailed geometric design gciidance in the preliminary and final engineering stages.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Lakewood/Florence Intersection Improvements, Downey, CA - Project Engineer for geometric alignments
- Civil team leader for design and coordination with sub-consultants - Responsible for QA/QC process
- Prepare the PS&E package
Avenue of Angels, Los Angeles, CA
- Project seeks to transform Francisco Street into an active pedestrian corridor linking the Financial Distrid to the Sports and Entertainment District - Prepared Street realignment to improved and enhanced traffic access along the Francisco Street for people and vehicles Los Angeles Convention Center (LACC) Expansion and Renovation, Los Angeles, CA
- New hall as an expansion would be constructed over Pico Boulevard to connect the existing West Hall and South Hall of Convention Center, to provide an expansion of up to 700,000 sq. ft.
- Performed technical engineering reviews of plans, specifications, and studies for geometric design/improvement of roadways, sidewalks, bikeways, and intersections around the project, considering Complete Street Elements in design
Los Angeles Skyscraper at 1045 0live, Los Angeles, CA - 70-story residential tower with nearly 800 apartments at South Olive and 11 Street. At 170 feet, it would also be among the city's tallest buildings - Perfoi-med analyses relating to the preparation of Traffic Impact Study (using CEQA new VMT metrics)
Coachella Valley Arena, Coachella, CA
- Coachella Valley Arena is a planned multi-purpose 10,000-seat indoor arena to be built in the Coachella Valley near Palm Desert, California. The project will be complete during the last quarter of 2022 - Prepared Parking Study (site access, internal circulation, parking shared analysis), and prepared parking lot layout, the design considered requirements for access, continuous circulation, sight distance, and accessible parking
- Performed freeway operational analysis
City of South Gate l Citywlde Residential Resurfacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST BKF ENGINEERS
7r268

APPENDICES

KEY PERSONNEL RESUME
- - a- DAVIS THRESH, PLS

SURVEY MANAGER
Throughout histenure with BKF, Davis has played a key role in many projects in both the public and private sectors. He has been the lead surveyor on numerous projects involving districts, cities, counties, and other local municipalities in California. He is responsible for management of all phases of land surveying including construction, both aerial and conventional topographic and planimetric surveys, boundary analysis and resolutions, right of way engineering, as-built surveys, digital terrain modeling, directing field and office survey efforts, contract document preparation, cost estimation, and contrad administration. He provides coordination with clients, other professional consultants and reviewing agencies.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Jamboree/Barranca Intersection Improvement Project, Irvine, CA - Coordinated research & field crews for boundary search & plotting - Topographic Map Drafting & Redlining
- Control - GPS Surveying Adjustments
- Coordinated Locating of Existing Monuments
Mount Vernon Viaduct Project, San Bernardino, CA
- Pre-Construction Record of Survey
- Survey Control
- Land Net Survey:
- Legal descriptions and plats
- Utility Mapping
- RecordofSurveys
Monument perpetuation
- Research of public records/maps
- Organization of all research records
- Utility Verification
- Advanced Design Surveys
- Right of Way Engineering
- Stake Property Lines
- Field and Office Survey Support
Post-construction Record of Survey
McKinley Street Grade Separation, Corona, CA
- Pre-Construction Record of Survey
- Survey Control
- Land Net Survey
Utility Verification
- Advanced Design Surveys
- Right of Way Engineering
- Stake Property Lines
- Field and Office Survey Support
- Post-construction Record of Survey
City of South Gate i Citywide Residential Resurfacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST BKF ENGINEERS
M44
'7?)269

APPENDICES
ffiX
ROGER W. SCHLIERKAMP, iVi.sc., PE
GMU PAVEMENT ENGINEERING i SENIOR PAVEMENT ENGINEER
Roger possesses over 10 years of experience in pavement engineering and construction related projects, such as pavement evaluation / design, pavement condition index studies, construdion testing/observation, specification development, and mix design development projects. His experience includes working with a number of local agencies, private sector clients, civil engineering firms, paving contractors, and pavement material producers. He has also worked successfully as a Quality Control / Quality Assurance Manager and Pavement Engineer on a wide variety of projects. His engineering experience includes performing pavei'nent evaluations, developing cost-effective paVement repair recommendations, performing pavement mix designs, and managing testing / observation services of pavement-focused construction projects.

SELECT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
E'.s. civil Engineering,
University of Nevada,
Reno, NV

REGISTRATION
Professional Civil
Engineer, CA No.
81529

TOTAL YEARS

EXPERIENCE
10 years
Plaza Del Amo at Western Mobility Enhancement Project, Torrence, CA - Performed pavement evaluation/design of existing roadway as well as widened roadway
Bonita Canyon Drive and Ford Road, Newport Beach, CA - Performed pavement evaluation consisting of pavement surface condition assessments, corings, deflection testing, tab testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations Bison Ave, San Joaquin Hills Road, San Nicolas, Newport Beach, CA - Performed pavement evaluation consisting of pavement surface condition assessments, corings, deflection testing, tab testing, analysis, and development of pavement rehabilitation recommendations Crenshaw Blvd Rehabilitation Project, Torrance, CA
- Performed pavement evaluation to develop pavement rehabilitation repair recommendations
City of Lake Forest Pavement Evaluations, Lake Forest, CA - Performed pavement evaluation for various pavement CIP projects, including Portola Parkway, Dimension Drive, Civic Center Drive, etc.

Santa Fe Springs and Painter Avenue Pavement Reconstruction Project, - Performed pavement evaluation and developed pavement reconstruction repair recommendations, including full-depth reconstruction repair South Residential 1" Pavement Evaluation Project, Santa Fe Springs, CA - Performed pavement evaluation and developed pavement reconstruction repair recommendations, including full-depth reconstruction repair - Provided observation and testing services during construci:ion phase FY 18-19 Pavement Maintenance/Repair Project, Dana Point, CA - Performed pavement surface condition assessments ofvarious streets throughout City of Dana point, prioritized streets for maintenance/ repaid recommended maintenance/repair strategies, reviewed/developed pavement-related specifications, oversaw quality assurance observation/ testing services during construction phase
City of South Gate l Citywide Residential Resurfacing,
Phase I & II, City Project No. 662-ST
M

BKF ENGINEERS
7!270
BKF
271

MODIFIED SCOPE OF WORK
While the BKF Team understands that the scope of the RFP, we would like to propose methods we have used on pavement projects that may be a great cost-savings to the City. As an example, the City would like to have supplemental survey to obtain cross slopes for the sections of the roadbed. We propose for topographic survey (at 20-scale) to only be used in areas where the streets will not change the crown and grade of the existing pavement. The cross slopes in grind and overlay or slurry seal treated areas will not be modified. This alone is a great cost savings to the City.

We would also propose for corings to be performed in certain streets. Adding the corings may increase the cost to the City in design, but by obtaining the structural pavement profile, our Team will better provide a recommendation for the pavement treatment that will yield a longer life cycle of the pavement. The longevity of the pavement will be a greater cost savings compared to the initial cost of the corings.

SCOPE OF SERVICES
As part of the Request for Proposal, the City has provided a detailed Scope of Services in the RFP. Therefore, in an effort to eliminate lengthy repetitions, we will address the Scope of Services as follows:

If the City Scope of Services is consistent with our approach and needs for a specific task, wewill simply state: "No exceptions to the Scope of Services" If BKF believes that in order deliver the Project there are additions, suggested modifications or clarifications, or deletions to the City's Scope of Services we provided the following section of this proposal.

Below is our concurrence or deviation from the Scope of Services provided by the City TASK1 Project Management No exceptions to the Scope of Services TASK 2
Agency & Utility
Coordination
Potho[ing is excluded from this Scope. Profiling
high hazardlhigh pressure fact(ities will
require potholing. The BKF Team wili identif y
the potho{e locations and provide the City the
scope and fee for this task uponrequest.

TASK3
Monument Restoration
(Optional) No exceptions to the Scope of Services
TASK4
TASK5
Preliminary Engineering
Plan Preparation
Supplementa{ survey will only be provided at
cprb rampsand2'y feet from the BCRIECR
Roadway Plans will be prepared at 40 scare
double-stacked.

Signing and Striping plans wili be prepared at
40 sca(e double-stacked.

City of South Gatei Citywide Residential Resufacing
Phase I & It, City Project No. 662-ST
7(b272
TASK 6 Cost Estimates No exceptions to the Scope of Services TASK7
TASK8
Specifications
Respond to Requests for
Information and Submittals
TASK 12 Prepare Record Drawings
(As-Builts)
No exceptions to the Scope of Services
No exceptions to the Scope of Services
No exceptions to the Scope of Services
City of South Gate l Citywide Residential ResurFacing
Phase I & It, City Project No. 662-ST
273
f ia "t
ffi !tl'
2 tf!l ,r
{{N
274
'ES ioNE
' 810 €
8100 !2 PL.

Lj
PAL M PL - PALM PL. ' . W W > y
8450

CASS PL I LIBERTY
S S SCHOOL o , SJ,
I 8400EY
I - -
"[ POST
jiiINDEPEND.lNCE
LJ -!IIE.LEMENT

INDEPENDENCE S '
"' . INnlPENDEElCE 'S ('- ,
r s 'vlT IJ
? . lm
9'00 6 Li
CESAR E CHAVEZ PARK CESAR E. CHAVEZ PARK PARK - J S € UTl-ERN AVE
I [IWA (1.1
"" In AVE"
"4 pBJWla STANFORD \9300 11
l tgYF. 11
9500
I ' S (9600 lj lj
9700 tr 9700
' A \S II> E
'i:

AVE TO <ooa VES- OF MILLER MY) 11 II10100
DRIVE "l 'II

CITY LIMIT
21l7'Xo'oo " }0400
l- l. l
[IUTHERN
%W' 1"" X ;
dl % C&
n' 8 :)
S[]LITHERN AVE, kAll'== I I
i l'y0-xqeicyosk"l i '_
i II,,,""" \\5/M!'C-LLUM! .,. 'A I
/\f!-j tg6}I
10 % "l%% I
% ( %% I
I % ?l%ll I
ElJNcqx 1, WAY %"%
ii 'sE;Gi: a;';l j 97
I I I v
11J l l -
I l I I ;
0 LJ,:)i
21 wnan H:
%' AVE 'S=
11LEGACY HIGH fl _
SCH € [IL (/)
,J!7fr :=
L € CATI € N MAP (RRP PHASE I-IV)

LEGENDI
275
Item No. 8
Office of the
SOuth Gate City Clerk
JUN 1 9 2024
FILED
/-af4=='tq
City of South Gate

CITY COUNCIL
ACENDA B3uLL
For the Regular Meeting of: June 25, 2024
/Origina5 Department: Public Works
nepartmentnirector: X" 7 a '- ciywanager:
lArturo Cervantes Rob Houston
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT N0. 1 TO CONTRACT N0. 2022-41-CC WITH HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., FOR THE SPORTS CENTER HV AC SYSTEM

CHILLER INSTAI,LATION
PURPOSE: To approve Aanendment No. I to Contract No. 2022-41-CC ("Amendment No. 1") with Honeywell International Inc., ("Honeywell") to perfon'n major maintenance on the Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system at the South Gate Park Sports Center.

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Tlie City Council will consider:
a. Approving Ainendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2022-41-CC with Honeywell International Inc., ("Agreement") to replace the existing chiller of the Sports Center HVAC System, at a cost not to exceed $106,000;
b. Authorizing the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2022-41-CC in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and
c. Authorizing the City Manager to approve amendments up to a cumulative amount of $30,000 to be funded with budgeted funds.

FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the General Fund. Amendment No. I to Contract No. 2022-41-CC is budgeted under the Sports Center HVAC Project, City Project No. 712-PRK in the amount of $106,000 and is funded with State Grant Funds (Rendon Funds). The revised contract amount is surnrnarized below.

Contract Services Amount Appropriation Total
FY 2022/23 $170,369 $170,369
FY 2023/24 $164,481 $164,481
FY 2024/25 and Amendment No. l $164,481 $106,000 $270,481 Total $499,331 $106,000 $605,331
ANALYSIS: The South Gate Park Sports Center HVAC Project ("HVAC Project") is under design and planned to begin construction in late 2024. The goal is to complete construction in mid-2025 prior to the suinmer season. The Project requires replacing the existing HVAC system which includes installing a 130-ton chiller. The procurement of the chiller has an estimated lead time of 42 weeks. To stay on schedule, staff purchased the chiller in advance of awarding a construction contract to ensure it is readily available for installation during construction. The chiller is scheduled to be delivered in July 2024, well before the project begins construction. i
276
To keep the HVAC system in operation during surnrnertime, a rental chiller is being used as a temporary replacement for the existing unit not working properly. Staff plans to install the new chiller to replace the existing unit under the current maintenance services contract with Honeywell. Once the new cl'iiller is installed, the rental unit will no longer be necessary.

Honeywell is the contract provider for routine HVAC Maintenance. Services include routine maintenance and equipment replacement of low-cost equipment specified in the contract. Major 'i'naintenance can be perfori'ned by Honeywell; however, the replacement of a major HVAC components such as tlie chiller is not routine maintenance. A contract amendment is required to authorize Honeywell to complete the work.

Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement in the amount of $106,000 provides the authorization to complete tlie work. Based on the preliminary cost evaluation by staff, the proposed charge seems reasonable. Amendment No. 1 will be funded by project funds budgeted in the FY 2023/24 CIP.

BACKGROUND: The existing HVAC System at the Sports Center needs major upgrades.

Its chiller system fails regularly as it is undersized and near the end of its service life. Due to it being undersized, it shuts down regularly during the hot suinmer months when demand is high. It provides inadequate cooling when the outside air temperature exceeds 85 degrees Fahrenheit.

Further, it does not provide adequate cooling to maintain comfortable temperatures in the two weight rooms. A temporary portable chiller unit has been rented to provide cooling during suini'ner season at an estimated cost of $25,000 monthly since last year. The Sports Center HVAC Project is being implemented to make the necessary HVAC system modifications and improvements.

Proceeding with the pre-installation of the chiller as the first phase of the HVAC Project has benefits. It provides a solution in advance of project construction which allows the rental chiller unit to be removed.

On July 1, 2022, the City Council approved the Agreement with Honeywell in the amount of $499,331 to provide routine HVAC repair/maintenance services for the City facilities.

Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement provides $106,000 for as needed services for the replacement of existing chiller at South Gate Sports Center, for a revised contract amount of $605,331. Services include removing rooftop chiller, and installing the pre-purchased chiller, piping, and electrical wiring as well as system integration, startup, and testing (Exhibit A).

Honeywell has been the City's HVAC system maintenance contractor for the last twenty-eight years. It lias met contract requirements satisfactorily. Honeywell is well resourced, having over $14 million in contracts throughout California. Its Field Operations units are equipped with mobile maintenance vehicles that are stationed near the City to ensure iinmediate response for any service calls. It has been responsive with timely repairs particularly when an HVAC fails to operate. Honeywell have offered acceptable customer service and skilled technicians who are able to resolve every issue that occurs.

Z/
277
ATT ACHMENTS: A.

B.

Proposed Amendment No. l (including Exhibit A)
ContractNo. 2022-41-CC
AA:lc
278
Attachmept,,:No. 2022Alendmen' No,,.Cl
AMENDMENT N0. 1 TO CONTRACT N0. 2022-41-CC

FOR HV AC MAINTENANCE, SERVICES
WITH HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.

This Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. 2022-41-CC for Maintenance Services ("Amendment No. 1 "), is made and entered into on June 25, 2024, by and between the City of South Gate, a municipal corporation ("City"), and Honeywell International Inc., a California corporation ("Contractor"). City and Contractor are sometimes hereinafter individually referred to as a "Party" and collectively as "Parties."
RECIT ALS:

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2022, the City Council approved Contract No. 2022-41-CC with Contractor ("Agreement ") for a period commenced on July 1, 2022, and ternninates on June 30, 2025, in the amount of Four Hundred Ninety-Nine Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-One Dollars ($499,331); and
WHEREAS, the City and Contractor/Consultant desire to execute Amendment No. 1 in an amorint not to exceed One Hundred Six Thousand Dollars ($106,000), for services identified in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, under the terms and conditions of the Agreement, bringing the aggregate total of the Agreement, and Amendment No. l to a total sum of Six Hundred Five Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-One Dollars ($605,331).

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1. SCOPE OF WORK.

City hereby engages Consultant, and Consultant accepts such engagement, to perform the services set forth in the Scope of Services as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made part of this Agreement. The Scope of Services may be mutually amended from time to time by both Parties in writing.

2. COMPENSATION.

The amount of compensation paid by City to Contractor for the work identified in Exhibit "A" shall not exceed One Hundred Six Thousand Dollars ($106,000).

3. EFFECT OF AMENDMENTS.

Except as expressly amended herein, all other terms and conditions of Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Agreement shall remain unchanged during the term of Agreement as extended by Section 1 above. Furthermore, City reserves the right to augment or reduce the scope of work as City deems necessary.