Agenda packet, first session — South Lake Tahoe City Council, April 5, 2022 (part 1 of 3)

1 City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council and South Tahoe Joint Powers Parking
Financing Authority
Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, April 05, 2022 at 9:00 AM
City Hall - Council Chambers - 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe City Council
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Cristi Creegan, Mayor Pro Tem
Cody Bass, Councilmember
John Friedrich, Councilmember
Tamara Wallace, Councilmember
Mission of the City Council
The City Council exists to represent the public
interest, to oversee the City's operations and to
plan for the City's future.

Public Participation
City Council meetings are held in person at the time and location listed on this agenda. Meetings are live-streamed on Channel 21, City website at www.cityofslt.us, City Facebook page at www.facebook.com/CityofSLT/ and via ZOOM at this link https://us06web.zoom.us/j/89005358174
A public agenda packet is available for review at City Hall, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, on the City’s Website at www.cityofslt.us, or by contacting the City Clerk’s Office, (530) 542-6005 or [email protected] Providing Public Comment:

In Person: Every agenda for regular meetings provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the legislative body (City Council), on any item of public interest which is within the jurisdiction of the City Council during Public Communications. For items on the agenda or in connection with any item which the City Council will consider, the public is given the opportunity to comment before or during the City Council's consideration of the item [Government Code Section 54954.3(a)].

By Phone: If you are joining the meeting via ZOOM and would like to make a comment, press the “raise a hand” button.

If you are joining the meeting via Channel 21 or live stream and would like to make a comment, please call (530) 542-6500. The meeting ID is ID: 890 0535 8174 press *9 to indicate a desire to make a comment. Press *6 to unmute your phone. The Clerk will call you by the last three digits of your phone number when it is your turn to speak.

In Writing: Written comments received by 3 p.m. the day before the meeting will be distributed to City Council prior to the meeting. Written public comment regarding any item on this agenda may be sent to [email protected].

When emailing comments, identify the agenda item number in the subject line to which your comments relate. Any such comment that is a public record and is emailed to [email protected] or otherwise provided to a majority of the City Council before the meeting will be made available for public inspection during normal business 1 2
hours at the City Clerk's Office located at City Hall, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe [Government Code Section 54957.5(b)]. Written comments will not be read out loud during the meeting.

The City Council Chambers meeting facility is accessible to people with disabilities. Every reasonable effort will be made to accommodate any person needing special assistance to attend this meeting. Contact the City Clerk at (530) 542-6005 at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting for assistance [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II and Brown Act Government Code Sections 54953.2, 54954.1, 54954.2, and 54957.5].

Spanish Interpretations: The public may access Spanish interpretation using the ZOOM link listed on the front of the Agenda from an internet device (smartphone, laptop, tablet, home computer) with audio capabilities and selecting the Spanish language option. Persons without an internet device may attend the meeting in-person and a device will be provided while supplies last. Requests for interpreter services to offer public comment may be made by contacting the City Clerk.

Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Closed Session Report
City Employee Recognition

1. City Employee Recognitions
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Two new employees will be introduced to City Council and one employee will be recognized for reaching 20 Years-Service.

Responsible Staff Member: Various
Item 1 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report Employee Service 04 05 2022.docx
Proclamations

2. Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Issue Proclamation recognizing April 2022, as "Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month". Accepting the Proclamation are Deanna Santana on behalf of the El Dorado County Child Abuse Prevention Council, Tammy Chako, Deputy Director, Child Welfare Services, El Dorado County Health & Human Services Agency, and Chelcee Thomas, Executive Director, Live Violence Free.

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Item 2 - Executive Summary.pdf
Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Awareness.docx
Public Communications
This is the public's opportunity to speak on any topic NOT LISTED on this agenda. Comments shall be limited to four (4) minutes. In accordance with the Brown Act, the City Council cannot deliberate or vote on any matter raised under public communications, but may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed. (Government Code Sections 54954.2)
City Commission Reports
Consent Agenda
2 3
Public Comment - This is the public's opportunity to speak on any topic listed on the Consent Agenda. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes.

The consent agenda consists of items of a repeating or routine nature considered under a single action. Any Councilmember may have an item on the consent agenda removed and considered separately upon request.

Pass a Motion to adopt the Consent Agenda in one motion except as indicated at each item.

3. City Council Meeting Minutes
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion approving the March 1, 2022 and March 15, 2022 Regular City Council meeting minutes.

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Item 3 - Executive Summary.pdf
03 01 2022 minutes.pdf
03 15 2022 Minutes.pdf

4. Agreement for Consultant Services to Develop a "Reach Code" for Enhanced Building Code Requirements With Integrated Design 360, LLC
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing $50,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for Reach Code development and authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute an Agreement for consultant services to develop a reach code with Integrated Design 360, LLC in an amount not to exceed $74,543.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Item 4 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Reach Code.docx
02-Resolution - Reach Code.docx
03-Agreement with Integrated Design 360LLC.

5. License Agreement with the California Tahoe Conservancy for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater & Greenbelt Improvement Project
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion to approve a License Agreement between the California Tahoe Conservancy and City of South Lake Tahoe to allow the City and the general public to occupy and use the facilities to be constructed on portions of 17 Conservancy-owned parcels for a 25-year term.

Responsible Staff Members: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager and Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator
Item 5 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report_CTC License Agreement.docx
02-Project Location Map.pdf
03-Greenbelt Concept Plan.pdf
04-Conservancy License Agreement.pdf

6. Agreement for Third Party Plan Review Services for Multi-Generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility with BPR Consulting Group
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute Professional Services Agreement with BPR Consulting Group in the amount of $42,800 with an additional contract contingency of 10% ($4,280) for third party plan review services.

Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvements Manager Item 6 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report Recreation Center Plan Review Services.docx 02 - BPR Proposal.pdf
3 4
03-Agreement with BPR.docx

7. Grant Acceptance and Fund Appropriation for Campground Restroom Relocation Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution to accept grant awards in the amount of $427,952 through the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Proposition 68 Per Capita and RIRE grant funding programs and appropriate said grant awards towards the relocation of the existing restroom located at the City’s campground for purposes of clearing the existing site for the construction of the city’s new Multi-Generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility.

Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvement Projects Manager Item 7 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report Per Capita and RIRE Grant Awards.docx
02 -Resolution to Accept Grant.docx
03-Grant Contracts (Exh. A to Reso.).pdf

8. Ordinance - Amendments to Cannabis Ordinance Prohibiting On-Site Consumption, Allowing Increased Cultivation Canopy of 22,000 Square Feet, and Allowing Owners and Operators to Hold More Than One Non-Retail Permit (Second Reading)
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: 1) Pass a Motion finding that the 2030 General Plan EIR adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed ordinance and that no further environmental analysis is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act; and 2) Pass a motion to hold a second reading (by title only) and adopt an Ordinance amending Article X (Cannabis Regulations) of Chapter 6.55 of the South Lake Tahoe City Code to prohibit on-site consumption, allow increased cultivation canopy of 22,000 square feet, and allow owners and operators to hold more than one non-retail permit
Responsible Staff Member: Heather Stroud, City Attorney Item 8 - Executive Summary.pdf
01 - Staff Report - City Council Second Reading.docx
02 - Ordinance.docx
Public Hearing

9. Sugar Pine Village Affordable Housing Project - Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the purpose of providing financing for a residential rental housing facility known as Sugar Pine Village Phase 1A.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Development Services Director Item 9 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - TEFRA.docx
02-Resolution - Sugar Pine Village Phase 1 TERFA.docx

10. Tentative Subdivision Map approval - 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard & 3709 Osgood Avenue Town Homes
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map.

Responsible Staff Member: John Hitchcock, Planning Manager Item 10 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report.docx
02-Tentative Map
03-Resolution - Tentative Map Approval.docx
04-CEQA Notice of Exemption.pdf
4 5
05-Presentation

11. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control - Public Convenience or Necessity - Grocery Outlet Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving issuance of a Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the Issuance of a Type 21 License for the Premises at 2358 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (Grocery Outlet Inc.)
Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner Item 11 - Executive Summary.pdf
01- Staff Report 22358LakeTahoeBlvd_22-017_PNC0220304.docx 02-ABC Application
03-Resolution - ABC Letter of Necessity - Grocery Outlet.docx 04- Letter of Public Necessity (Exh. A to Reso)
05-Notice of Public Hearing

12. Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Assessment Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution confirming the Ski Run Business Improvement District annual report and levying the assessment for business license year 2022/2023.

Responsible Staff Member: Ben Hannah, Accountant II
Item 12 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Ski Run BID.docx
02-Resolution - Ski Run BID.docx
03-BID Board Report to City (Exh. A to Reso.)
04-SRBID 2022-2023 Budget Proposal.pdf
05-SRBID 2022-2023 Budget Proposal_Prior Year vs Proposed.pdf 06-SRBID 2022-2023 Budget Proposal_Includes Measure S Recreation.pdf 07-Tribune Notice Copy 03.04.2022.pdf
08-SRBID Members 2022.xls
09-Resolution 2002-71 SRBID Formation.pdf
Regular-Unfinished Business

13. Contract for the Supply and Installation of LED Lighting Retrofit Assemblies for US 50 Between Trout Creek and Ski Run Blvd. With Advanced Lighting Services, Inc.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: (1) Pass a Resolution appropriating funds for the award of a Public Works Contract for LED lighting retrofits to Advanced Lighting Services, Inc. either: A) for the project base bid amount of $87,845.43 and 10% contingency of $8,784.54; or B) for the project base bid and additive alternates 1 & 2 amount of $150,418.15 and 10% contingency of $15,041.82; and (2) Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Advanced Lighting Services, Inc. for the selected amount.

Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvement Program Manager Item 13 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report_LED Lighting Retrofit_US 50 and Ski Run Boulevard Pedestrian Lights.docx 02-LED Retrofit Location Map
03-Bid Results
04A-Resolution - Base Bid Only.docx
04B-Resolution - Base Bid Plus Alts 1 & 2.docx
05-Agreement with Advanced Lighting Services.docx
5 6

14. Ordinance – Amendments to South Lake Tahoe City Code Section 4.150.210 (Placement of Residential Containers for Collection Purposes) to Require Better Trash Management (First Reading)
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion to hold a first reading (by title only) of an Ordinance Amending Section 4.150.210 (Placement of Residential Containers for Collection Purposes) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code to Require Better Trash Management, and refer second reading and adoption to the May 3, 2022 meeting.

Responsible Staff Member: Sara Letton, Sustainability Coordinator Item 14 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Better Trash Management Ordinance.docx 02-Ordinance - Better Trash Management.docx.docx
03-Redline of Ordinance Amendment.pdf
Regular-New Business

15. Ordinance - Military Equipment Use Policy (First Reading) Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion to hold first reading (by title only) of an Ordinance approving a military equipment use policy and refer second reading and adoption to the May 3, 2022 meeting.

Responsible Staff Member: David Stevenson, Police Chief Item 15 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-STAFF REPORT - Military Equipment Use.docx
02--ORDINANCE - Military Equipment Use.docx
03-POLICY - Military Equipment Use (Attachment 03 to Ordinance).docx 04-EQUIPMENT LIST (Attachment 04 to Ordinance).docx
05-AB 481 - Military Equipment Use Act.pdf

16. Travel Authorization - California Tahoe Alliance Advocacy Days, Sacramento, April 19-20, 2022 Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing Mayor Middlebrook and Mayor Pro-Tem Creegan to attend the California Tahoe Alliance Advocacy Days in Sacramento. The estimated cost per person is $550.

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Item 16 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report-California Tahoe Advocacy Days Sacramento.docx 02-CTA Advocacy Day Schedule
Regular New Business - South Tahoe Joint Powers Parking Financing Authority

17. Agreement with Walker Consultants for the City Parking Garage Access and Revenue Control System and Modification Project
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Acting as the South Tahoe Joint Powers Parking Financing Authority, Pass a Resolution authorizing and directing the Chair to execute Professional Services Agreement with Walker Consultants in the amount of $187,230, and appropriating $205,953 (including contingency) into the Parking Garage Revenue Expense Account for the Parking Garage Access and Revenue Control System and Modification Project.

Responsible Staff Members: Anush Nejad, Director of Public Works, Scott Crivelli, Detective Sergeant, and Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Item 17 - Executive Summary.pdf
01-Staff Report - Parking Garage Services.docx
02 - Proposal_Walker.pdf
6 7
03 - Professional_Services_Agreement_ Walker.pdf
04-Resolution - STJPPFA Parking Garage.docx
Agenda Planning Calendar

18. Agenda Planning Calendar
Requested Action / Suggested Motions: A Councilmember may request that an item be placed on a future agenda. Upon the support of one (1) additional Council Member, direction shall be given to the City Manager to calendar the item for a convenient future agenda, but no sooner than the second meeting after the request was made, and/or modify the Agenda Planning Calendar as desired.

Responsible Staff Member: Joseph Irvin, City Manager
Item 18 - Executive Summary.pdf
APC - March 25, 2022.pdf
Updates and Announcements (City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager) Councilmember Reports and Comments - Assignments to Boards, Committees, and Commissions Closed Session

19. Public Employee Performance Evaluations – Government Code section 54957(b)(1) Title: City Manager and City Attorney

20. Conference with Labor Negotiator – Government Code section 54957.6(a) Designated Representative: Thomas Stuart, Assistant to City Manager II Unrepresented Employees: City Manager and City Attorney Adjournment
I, Susan Blankenship, City Clerk for the City of South Lake Tahoe, declare that the foregoing agenda for the Tuesday April 5, 2022 meeting of the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council was posted and available for review on Thursday, March 31, 2022 at City Hall, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. The agenda was also available on the City website at https://www.cityofslt.us.

Signed March 31, 2022
\\sb\\
Susan Blankenship, Elected City Clerk
7 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 1
Agenda Item: City Employee Recognitions
Executive Summary: New City employees and long-serving City employees who reach the 5, 10, 15, 20, & 25 year service milestone will be recognized at each monthly meeting.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Two new employees will be introduced to City Council and one employee will be recognized for reaching 20 Years-Service.

Responsible Staff Member: Various
Responsible Staff Member: Various Departments
Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:
01-Staff Report Employee Service 04 05 2022.docx
8 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: City Employee Recognition
Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Various Department Directors
Background: Following past practice, new regular City employees are introduced to Council during a City Council meeting.

As part of the City’s Employee Recognition Program, employees who have reached five, ten, fifteen, twenty and twenty-five years of service are recognized for their achievements and contributions to the City.

New Regular City Employees:

City Manager
Sara Letton - Sustainability Coordinator
Public Works
Chris Heckathorn – Maintenance Tech III
Police Department
Rosemary Martins – Community Service Officer
Service Awards:

Finance Department
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director – 20-Years’ service
City Attorney
Jean Bauwens, Paralegal – 5 Years’ Service
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 1
9 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 2
Agenda Item: Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month Executive Summary: The City Council desires to recognize the month of April 2022 as "Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month" in the City of South Lake Tahoe, so that community awareness and participation in violence prevention may be encouraged.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Issue Proclamation recognizing April 2022, as "Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month". Accepting the Proclamation are Deanna Santana on behalf of the El Dorado County Child Abuse Prevention Council, Tammy Chako, Deputy Director, Child Welfare Services, El Dorado County Health & Human Services Agency, and Chelcee Thomas, Executive Director, Live Violence Free.

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk (530) 542-6005 Reviewed and Approved By:

Attachments:

Proclamation - Child Abuse Prevention Awareness.docx
10 City of South Lake Tahoe
Proclamation
Recognizing April 2022 as
“Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month”
Whereas, Preventing child abuse and neglect means strengthening families so that their children can thrive; and Whereas, 2,365 reports of abuse and/or neglect were made to El Dorado County Child Protective Services in 2021, of which 226 were investigated and found to be substantiated ; and Whereas, In 2020, according to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 143 children in California died as a result of child abuse and neglect, including children in our own county; and Whereas, Children who have been abused or neglected have a higher risk of developing various health problems as adults, including alcoholism, depression, drug abuse, eating disorders, obesity, suicide, early death, and certain chronic diseases; and
Whereas, California's children deserve to grow up in a safe and nurturing environment free from fear, abuse, and neglect; and
Whereas, in the City of South Lake Tahoe, children are victims of one, or perhaps several types of child abuse each year; and
Whereas, The El Dorado County Child Abuse Prevention Council seeks to elevate the message of our community recognizing and reporting suspected child abuse to protect all children in El Dorado County; and Whereas, Live Violence Free has led the way in South Lake Tahoe in addressing child abuse by providing 24- hour hotline services to victim/survivors and their significant others, responding to emergency calls, providing child abuse prevention presentations, community trainings, and empowering those impacted by child abuse to chart their own course for healing; and
Whereas, Child abuse and neglect have long-term economic and societal costs; and Whereas, Providing community-based prevention services to families whose children may be at risk of child abuse or neglect is less costly than addressing the emotional and physical damage that can result from child abuse and neglect; and
Whereas, Providing community-based prevention services to those families can help avoid the costs of protective services, law enforcement, the judicial system, foster care, and the treatment of adults recovering from abuse as children; and
Whereas, Pinwheels are displayed to increase the awareness of child abuse and to focus on the positive message of preventing child abuse and neglect by supporting families and strengthening communities during Child Abuse Prevention Month.

Now, therefore, the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe does hereby proclaim the month of April 2022 as "Child Abuse Prevention Awareness Month" in the City of South Lake Tahoe, so that community awareness and participation in violence prevention may be encouraged. ________________________ __________________________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
11 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 3
Agenda Item: City Council Meeting Minutes
Executive Summary: City Council is asked to formally approve the March 1, 2022 and March 15, 2022 Regular City Council meeting minutes..

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion approving the March 1, 2022 and March 15, 2022 Regular City Council meeting minutes.

Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk Responsible Staff Member: Susan Blankenship, City Clerk (530) 542-6005 Reviewed and Approved By:

Attachments:
03 01 2022 minutes.pdf
03 15 2022 Minutes.pdf
12 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, March 01, 2022 at 9:00 AM
City Hall - Council Chambers - 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe City Council
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Cristi Creegan, Mayor Pro Tem
Cody Bass, Councilmember
John Friedrich, Councilmember
Tamara Wallace, Councilmember
Mission of the City Council
The City Council exists to represent the public
interest, to oversee the City's operations and to
plan for the City's future.

NOTE: The Meeting Minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council members discussions on Regular Session meeting items can be viewed in archived video recordings on the City’s website at http://www.cityofslt.us Public submittals on items are retained in the administrative record and can be viewed in the City Clerk’s repository at http://www.cityofslt.us
At 9:00 a.m. Mayor Middlebrook called the meeting to order. Middlebrook then led the pledge of allegiance to the flag.

Roll Call
Present were Mayor Middlebrook, Councilmembers Bass, Creegan, and Friedrich. Councilmember Wallace was absent.

Also present were City Manager Irvin, City Attorney Stroud, and City Clerk Blankenship.

City Employee Recognitions

1. City Employee Recognitions
Action: Jessica Newman and Kevin Schryvers, Police Department, and Jessisa Wakenhut Lomeli, Development Services, were introduced to City Council. Michelle Schoonveld, Development Services, Joseph Nuckols, Public Works, and Traci Trapini, Police Department were recognized for reaching 5 Years-Service.

Public Communications
Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Dan Brown – Women’s History month, Veteran’s Memorial request

2. Bruce Fritz – neighbor dispute

3. Ed Mosur –Ukraine support, sustainability

4. Darlene Fritz – neighbor dispute
Written Public Comment was received from the following people:

5. Judi Allen – bear boxes

6. Anonymous - Councilmembers

7. Ambrose Bierce – city corruption

8. Nellie Bly – Cristi Creegan/cell towers

9. James Gruss – public comment platform

10. John Powell – Bijou Creek Park

11. Harper Puck – Devin Middlebrook
13 2

12. Lincoln Steffens – City corruption

13. Joseph Story – Diana Madson
City Commission Reports
None.

Consent Agenda
Action: Moved/Seconded: Bass/Friedrich
Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich and Middlebrook

Absent: Wallace
Action: Passed Consent Agenda

2. City Council Meeting Minutes
Action: Passed Motion 2022-022 approving the February 15, 2022, Regular City Council meeting minutes.

3. Ordinance Amending Chapter 6.85 (Residential Development and Design Standards) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code to Establish Requirements for Movable Tiny Homes (Second Reading)
Action: Passed Ordinance 2022-1160 amending Chapter 6.85 (Residential Development and Design Standards) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code to establish requirements for movable tiny homes.

4. Reimbursement Agreement with South Tahoe Public Utility District Action: Passed Motion 2022-023 to authorize and directed the Mayor to execute Agreement C-031-2022 with South Tahoe Public Utility District (STPUD) for payment in lieu of pavement repair as a result of water line replacement for the Bowers Project.

Regular-Unfinished Business

5. Citizen Appointments to Commissions and Boards – Building & Housing Board of Appeals Action: Moved/Seconded: Friedrich/Creegan
Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich and Middlebrook

Absent: Wallace
Action: Passed Motion 2022-024 appointing Courtney Schmidt to serve a 2-year term to the Building Board of Appeals.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Dan Brown
Written Comment was received from the following person:

2. Courtney Schmidt

6. Small Business Sustainability (SBS) Loan Program Update Action: Moved/Seconded: Bass/ Friedrich
Yes: Bass, Creegan and Friedrich
No: Middlebrook

Absent: Wallace
Action: Passed Motion 2022-025 to forgive 2021 COVID-19 Small Business Sustainability Loans and strongly encourage those businesses to make contributions to South Lake Tahoe non-profit organizations.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur
Regular-New Business

7. South Lake Tahoe Fire Rescue - Annual Report 2021
Action: Received and Filed.
14 3

8. Underground Storm Drain Pipe Condition Assessment Results Action: Received presentation and provided feedback on recommended funding needs for asset repair and replacement.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur

9. City Development Rights Annual Report
Action: Moved/Seconded: Bass/ Friedrich
Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich and Middlebrook

Absent: Wallace
Note: Staff distributed written material.

Action: Passed Resolution 2022-023 accepting the development rights appraisal prepared by Johnson Valuation Group Limited and establishing a price point for the calendar year 2022 at onethird of the recommended rate outlined in the appraisal. City Council directed staff to review the City’s policy regarding the sale price of development rights The following person addressed City Council:

1. Ben Johnson, Johnson Valuation Group, Ltd.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

2. Ed Mosur
Written Comment was received from the following people:

3. Saundra Edwards

4. John Wesley Powell

10. Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Assessment Action: Moved/Seconded: Bass/Creegan
Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich and Middlebrook

Absent: Wallace
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-024 declaring intention to levy an annual assessment for the 2022-2023 fiscal year upon the Ski Run Business Improvement District.

The following person address City Council:

1. Jeff Cowen, Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Written Comment was heard from the following people:

2. Saundra Edwards

3. Warren Harding

4. John Wesley Powell

5. Phuket Sherpa II

11. 2021-2022 Master Fee Schedule
Action: City Council provided directed to add a Veteran discount to Recreation facility use and program fees, and to increase fines associated with refuse. Council requested staff bring back an Ordinance to address bad trash behavior.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur

12. Activation of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe Action: Moved/Seconded: Bass/Friedrich
Yes: Bass, Creegan, Friedrich and Middlebrook

Absent: Wallace
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-025 declaring a need for a parking authority to function in the City and declaring the City Council to be the Board of Directors of the Parking Authority. 15 4
Public Comment was heard from the following people:

1. Ed Mosur

2. Kenny Curtzweiler *written material distributed

3. Judi Allen *written comment also received
Written Comment was received from the following people:

4. John Chambers

5. David Jinkens
Agenda Planning Calendar

13. Agenda Planning Calendar
Action: Received.

Updates and Announcements (City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager) City Clerk:

1. Next meeting March 15, 2022, 5:30 p.m.

City Manager:

1. Director Roverud’s provided information on the City’s response to Fritz’s neighbor dispute Councilmember Reports and Comments - Assignments to Boards, Committees, and Commissions Councilmember Friedrich:

1. Multicultural Alliance Subcommittee meeting

2. Tahoe Regional Planning Governing Board meeting

3. Welcome to Sara Letton, Sustainability Coordinator

4. Noted mask requirement changes
Councilmember Bass:

1. LAFCO and Cal JPA meeting updates
Councilmember Creegan:

1. School District Facility Advisory Committee update

2. Behavioral Mental Health Network meeting

3. Noted COVID restrictions changes
Mayor Middlebrook:

1. Tahoe Prosperity Center 2020 Census survey results

2. Veterans Memorial Support (Bass second)
Adjournment
At 12:00 p.m. Mayor Middlebrook adjourned the meeting.
__________________________ _______________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor Date
Attest:
___________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
16 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council, Parking Authority and South Tahoe
Redevelopment Successor Agency
Meeting Minutes
Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 5:30 PM
City Hall - Council Chambers - 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe City Council
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Cristi Creegan, Mayor Pro Tem
Cody Bass, Councilmember
John Friedrich, Councilmember
Tamara Wallace, Councilmember
Mission of the City Council
The City Council exists to represent the public
interest, to oversee the City's operations and to
plan for the City's future.

NOTE: The Meeting Minutes represent actions taken during the meeting of the City Council. Complete Council members discussions on Regular Session meeting items can be viewed in archived video recordings on the City’s website at http://www.cityofslt.us Public submittals on items are retained in the administrative record and can be viewed in the City Clerk’s repository at http://www.cityofslt.us
Call to Order/Pledge of Allegiance
At 5:31 p.m. Mayor Middlebrook called the meeting to order. Middlebrook then led the pledge of allegiance to the flag.

Roll Call
Present were Mayor Middlebrook, Councilmembers, Creegan, Friedrich and Bass. Councilmember Bass was absent.

Also present were City Manager Irvin, City Attorney Stroud, and City Clerk Blankenship.

City Employee Recognition

1. City Employee Recognition
Action: Maureen Stuhlman was recognized for her contribution of major significance in Women's History.

The following person addressed City Council:

1. Noel Farmer, Tahoe Neighborhood Group *written material distributed Public Communications
Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur – loan forgiveness, real estate values in the City Written Public Comment was received from the following people:

2. Saundra Edwards- Tamara Wallace

3. Stella Gibbons – Steve Teshara

4. Wally Pinniped – Tamara Wallace

5. Charles Russell – Jason Collin

6. Ralph Abernathy – cell towers

7. Ambrose Bierce – City corruption
17 2

8. Rob Bilott – Tahoe Prosperity Center

9. Nellie Bly – cell towers

10. John Carlos – over tourism

11. James Gruss – cell towers

12. Warren Harding- Chris McNamara/Cory Rich

13. Robert La Follette – outside interests in the City

14. Peter Norman – over tourism

15. John Powell – Bijou Park Creek

16. Harper Puck – Devin Middlebrook

17. Phuket Sherpa II – Cory Rich

18. Lincoln Steffens – City corruption

19. Joseph Story – City corruption

20. Jonathan Swift – Cristi Creegan

21. Gaius Lucillius – strategic plan

22. Gerald O. Barney – cell towers

23. Edgar Wayburn – Concerned Citizens

24. Kelly Hardin – Cody Bass

25. Udo Keppler – City corruption

26. Paul Weitz – Tamara Wallace
City Commission Reports
None.

Consent Agenda
Note: The City Manager requested Items 3 and 4 be moved to a future meeting.

Action: Moved/Seconded: Friedrich/Wallace
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Consent Agenda with Items 3 and 4 moved to a future meeting.

Note: Councilmember Creegan disclosed she is a Board Member for Live Violence Free (non-profit) before the vote was taken on Item 2.

2. Law Enforcement Specialized Unit Grant – Domestic Violence Programs Action: Passed Resolution 2022-026 ratifying grant application and execution of grant agreement and authorizing receipt of grant funds from the California Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES) in support of the South Lake Tahoe Police Department and Live Violence Free through the Law Enforcement Specialized Unit Grant for the calendar year 2022 in an amount up to $203,142.

3. Grant Acceptance and Fund Appropriation for Campground Restroom Relocation Action: This Item was moved to a future meeting.

Written Comment was received from the following people:

1. Edwin Bustillos

2. Saundra Edwards

3. Granville Fortescue

4. Susan Griffin

5. Will Irwin

6. Val Plumbwood

7. Richard Smothers

8. Grace Thorpe

9. Paul Thorpe

10. John Turner

11. Brent Wisner
18 3

4. Professional Services Agreement with BPR Consulting Group for Third Party Plan Review Services for Multi-Generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility Action: This Item was moved to a future meeting.

5. Grant Application to California Natural Resources Agency, Urban Greening Grant Program for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater & Greenbelt Improvement Project Action: Passed Resolution 2022-028 authorizing Public Works to submit grant application for an amount of up to $4.5 million to California Natural Resources Agency, Urban Greening Grant Program.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Steve Teshara, Tahoe Chamber

6. Amendment No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement between Cardno and the City of South Lake Tahoe for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater & Greenbelt Improvement Project Action: Passed Motion 2022-027 to authorize and direct the Mayor to execute C-034-2022 Amendment No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement between Cardno and the City of South Lake Tahoe to extend term for one year until June 30, 2023 and add compensation of $64,590 for a total amount not to exceed $736,350.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Steve Teshara, Tahoe Chamber

7. Reimbursement Agreement with South Tahoe Public Utility District for the Bijou Project Action: Passed Motion 2022-028 to authorize and direct the Mayor to execute Agreement C-033-2022 with South Tahoe Public Utility District for payment in lieu of pavement repair as a result of water line replacement for the Bijou Water Replacement Project.

8. 2021-2022 Master Fee Schedule
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-029 adopting the Annual Master Schedule of Fees and Charges for City Services.

Regular-Unfinished Business

9. Proposed Amendments to Cannabis Ordinance and Public Safety License Ordinance Regarding On-site Consumption, Allowing increased Cultivation Canopy of 22,000 Square Feet, and Allowing Owners and Operators to Hold More Than One Non-Retail Permit Action: Moved/Seconded: Creegan/Friedrich
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich and Middlebrook
No: Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: 1) Passed Motion 2022-029 finding that the 2030 General Plan EIR adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed ordinance and that no further environmental analysis is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act; and 2) Passed Motion 2022-030 to hold a first reading (by title only) of an Ordinance (Version 2) amending Article X (Cannabis Regulations) of Chapter 6.55 of the South Lake Tahoe City Code and refer second reading and adoption to the April 5, 2022 meeting.

Public Comment was heard from the following people:

1. Ed Mosur

2. Benjamin Mytelka, Redefining Organics.

Written Comment was heard from the following person:

3. Lionel Hutz
19 4

10. Cannabis Revenue Policy, Grant Program Process and Guidelines Action: Moved/Seconded: Wallace/Friedrich
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-030 adopting the Cannabis Revenue Policy, Grant Program Process and Guidelines.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur
Written Comment was heard from the following person:

2. Lionel Hutz
Regular-New Business City Council

11. Police Department Annual Report 2021
Action: Received and Filed.

12. Appropriation of State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) for Park Projects
Action: Moved/Seconded: Friedrich/Creegan
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-031 appropriating SLFRF funds in the amount of $50,000 for the acquisition of solar trash compactors to be placed throughout City parks and $35,000 for proposed maintenance improvements to the City's Bike Park.

Public Comment was heard from the following people:

1. David Gregorich, Parks and Recreation Commissioner

2. Steve Teshara, Tahoe Chamber

13. 2021 General Plan Annual Report and Surplus Land Inventory Note: Staff provided a PowerPoint presentation
Action: Moved/Seconded: Creegan/Wallace
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: 1) Passed Resolution 2022-032 accepting the General Plan Annual Report for 2021; and, 2) Passed Resolution 2022-033 declaring surplus land inventory.

14. Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Mid-Year Budget Review, Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Position Listing, and Five Year Financial Plan Update
Note: Staff provided a PowerPoint presentation
Action: Moved/Seconded: Friedrich/Creegan
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-034 approving FY 2021-2022 Mid-Year Budget Adjustments and Amendments to the Allocated Permanent Position Listing for Changes Made during Mid-Year.

City Council provided consensus, directing the City Manager to bring back a discussion item on increasing the City’s General Fund Reserve.
20 15. Joint application with El Dorado County for Grant from U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) for Middle-Mile Broadband Implementation Action: Moved/Seconded: Creegan/Friedrich
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-035 1) Authorizing the Department of Public Works to jointly submit a grant application to the U.S. Economic Development Administration (EDA) in collaboration with El Dorado County for Middle-Mile Broadband Implementation along US 50 and 89; and 2) Committing to the match funding requirements in the total amount of $1,128,000 from 2021-2022 American Rescue Plan Act funding.

The following person addressed the City Council:

1. Diane Kruse, NEO Connect *provided a PowerPoint presentation

16. Grant Applications to Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Program for Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan and Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project
Action: Moved/Seconded: Wallace/Creegan
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-036 1) Authorizing the Department of Public Works to submit two grant applications through the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) program; and 2) Committing to the match funding requirement in the amount of $480,000 for the Complete Streets Programmatic Master Plan and $400,000 for the Ruby Way/Overlook Court Erosion Control and Mobility Improvement Project from the undesignated General Funds.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur
Note: Item 20 was pulled forward in the Agenda with consent of Council.

Regular New Business - Parking Authority

20. Adoption of Bylaws of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe Action: Moved/Seconded: Wallace/Creegan
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Parking Authority Resolution 2022-002 adopting the official Bylaws of the Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe.

Public Comment was heard from the following person:

1. Ed Mosur
Written Comment was received from the following person:

2. David Gregorich
5 Note: City Manager presented items 17, 18 and 19 in unison.

Public Comment on Items 17, 18, and 19 was heard from the following people:

1. David Gregorich

2. Ed Mosur
21 6
Regular New Business City Council (cont.)

17. Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority
Action: Moved/Seconded: Wallace/Friedrich
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Passed Resolution 2022-037 approving C-032-2022 Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority to replace Successor Agency with Parking Authority.

Regular New Business - South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency

18. Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority
Action: Moved/Seconded: Wallace/Creegan
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Acting as the Board of the South Tahoe Redevelopment Successor Agency, Passed STRSA Resolution 2022-002 Approving C-032-2022 Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority to replace Successor Agency with Parking Authority.

Regular New Business Parking Authority (cont.)

19. Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority
Action: Moved/Seconded: Wallace/Middlebrook
Yes: Creegan, Friedrich, Middlebrook, and Wallace

Absent: Bass
Action: Acting as the Board of Parking Authority of the City of South Lake Tahoe, Passed Parking Authority Resolution 2022-001 Approving C-032-2022 Amendment No. 1 to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for the South Tahoe Joint Powers Financing Authority to replace Successor Agency with Parking Authority.

Agenda Planning Calendar

21. Agenda Planning Calendar
Action: Received.

Updates and Announcements (City Attorney, City Clerk, City Manager) City Clerk

1. Noted Public Communication from Hardin.

City Manager:

1. City Lifeguard positions
Councilmember Reports and Comments - Assignments to Boards, Committees, and Commissions
Councilmember Friedrich:

1. First Multi-Cultural Festival September 24
Councilmember Creegan:

1. Clean Tahoe and Solid Waste JPA upcoming meetings
22 7
Mayor Middlebrook:

1. Strategic Planning meeting

2. Tahoe Prosperity Center Envision Tahoe
Adjournment
At 8:34 p.m. Mayor Middlebrook adjourned the meeting.
__________________________
_______________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Date Attest:
___________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
23 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 4
Agenda Item: Agreement for Consultant Services to Develop a "Reach Code" for Enhanced Building Code Requirements With Integrated Design 360, LLC
Executive Summary: To implement the Climate Action Plan (CAP) strategy to “Reduce Energy Consumption, Improve Efficiency, and Install Renewable Energy in New Construction” the CAP directs the City to explore potential “reach” codes that include energy efficiency measures beyond state requirements for new construction. The City released a Request for Proposals from consultants that could provide technical support and analysis to assist City staff in developing a reach code and is recommending entering into a Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Design 360, LLC. The Professional Services Agreement would be funded through $50,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funding and $24,543 in previously budgeted funds for contract services.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing $50,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for Reach Code development and authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute an Agreement for consultant services to develop a reach code with Integrated Design 360, LLC in an amount not to exceed $74,543.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services (530) 5540-6024 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Reach Code.docx
02-Resolution - Reach Code.docx
03-Agreement with Integrated Design 360LLC.
24 Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Design 360, LLC for consultant services to develop a reach code
Location: City-wide
Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services John James, Building Official
Background:In October 2020, the City Council adopted its first Climate Action Plan (CAP) which serves as a long-term plan to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from community activities, as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. One of many GHG reduction strategies contained in the CAP is to “Reduce Energy Consumption, Improve Efficiency, and Install Renewable Energy in New Construction.” To implement this strategy, the CAP directs the City to explore potential “reach” codes that include energy efficiency measures beyond state requirements for new construction.

Issue and Discussion: The City released a Request for Proposals from consultants that could provide technical support and analysis to assist City staff in developing a reach code on January 4, 2022 with proposals due by February 7, 2022 (See Attachment 01). One proposal was received from Integrated Design 360, LLC (ID360). The proposal was reviewed by City staff and determined to be a responsive proposal. City staff discussed the scope of work with Melanie Jacobson, ID360 Principal, and requested that additional tasks be included. Tasks 3k and 6 were included to address the potential need for cost benefit and economic impact analysis in addition to analysis that is expected to be provided by the California Energy Commission (CEC). The need for this task will be determined after completion of the CEC analysis and meetings with stakeholders. A presentation to City Council as part of Task 2 was also added in order to provide an opportunity for City Council to provide input on the process after initial research and community/stakeholder outreach is conducted. The organization of stakeholder and community meetings was also modified to provide two of each type of meeting.

Financial Implications: The proposed Professional Services Agreement with ID360 contains a not to exceed amount of $74,543.

On August 17, 2021 City Council discussed the results of a community survey representing a variety of projects and programs that would be eligible for American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF). Conducting community participation and economic analysis to determine the effectiveness and feasibility of reach code options was chosen by City Council as a viable use of ARPA funding and the City Council supported the use of $50,000 in ARPA funds for this project.

The SLFRF funding is subject to the requirements specified in the Interim Final Rule adopted by Treasury, which describes whether a program, project, or services is an eligible use. 25 Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2
Prohibited uses clearly outlined in Treasury guidance include:
 Deposits to Reserves or Rainy-Day Funds
 Deposits to Pension Funds for unfunded liabilities (current service costs may be eligible)  Debt Service Payments
 Offset to tax cuts caused by a change in local law.

Outside of these restrictions, the City has substantial discretion to use the funds in ways that best suit the needs of the community – if the use fits into one of the following four statutory categories:

A. To respond to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts, including assistance to households, small businesses, and nonprofits, or aid to impacted industries such as tourism, travel, and hospitality.

B. To respond to workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency by providing premium pay to eligible workers.

C. For the provision of government services to the extent of the reduction in revenue (“revenue loss”) due to the COVID-19 public health emergency relative to revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior to the emergency.

D. To make necessary investments in water, sewer, or broadband infrastructure.

On January 6th, 2022 the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the Final Rule for the SLFRF program. The final rule provides state and local governments with increased flexibility to pursue a wider range of uses, as well as greater simplicity so the government can focus on responding to the crisis in the communities and maximizing the impact of their funds. In addition to several expansions to the above categories, it provided the option to elect a standard allowance for revenue loss rather than calculating revenue loss through the formula. Under this option, Treasury presumes that up to $10 million in revenue has been lost due to the public health emergency and recipients are permitted to use that amount (not to exceed the award amount) to fund “government services.” On February 1, 2022, the City Council through Resolution 2022-019, elected the provision of a “standard allowance” for the allocated to the City $5,309,994 to spend on government services through the period of performance.

The attached resolution would appropriate $50,000 from SLFRF funds to the Building and Safety contract services account (10003110 42025). An additional $24,543 in previously budgeted funds for contract services will fund the remaining balance of the professional services agreement with Integrated Design 360, LLC.

Environmental Considerations: The recommendation in this report is not a project under CEQA, because it does not involve any commitment to a specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment, as contemplated by Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15378(b)(2) and 15378(b)(4) and is, therefore, not subject to CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15060(c)(3).

Policy Implications: None.
26 Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 5, 2022
Authorizing $50,000 of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Funds for Reach Code Development and Authorizing and Directing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement for Consultant Services to develop a Reach Code With Integrated Design 360, LLC in an Amount Not to Exceed $74,543

BACKGROUND
A. The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) (Public Law No. 117-2) was signed into law by the President of the United States on March 11, 2021.

B. The Act appropriated Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) for allocation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury to states, counties, metropolitan cities, and small cities with population under 50,000 (referred to as non-entitlement units of local government).

C. On June 15, 2021 the City Council adopted Resolution 2021-052 establishing the special fund “Local Fiscal Recovery Fund” and authorizing the Director of Finance to accept all funds received under the American Rescue Plan Act and deposit them in the Local Fiscal Recovery Fund.

D. On August 17, 2021 the City Council considered a list of potential projects for ARPA funding and the community outreach and economic analysis for development of a REACH code was chosen by City Council as a viable use of ARPA funding and directed staff to move forward in developing the scope of work and estimated costs.

E. On January 6, 2022, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued the Final Rule for the SLFRF program that provides increased flexibility allowing recipients elect a “standard allowance” of up to $10 million (not to exceed the award amount) to replace lost public sector revenue to pay for “government services”, with streamlined reporting requirements.

F. On February 1, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution 2022-019 electing the provision of a “standard allowance” of up to $10 million provided in the Treasury Final Rule to spend on government services through the period of performance, for the allocated to the City $5,309,994 to be received in two tranches.

G. In October 2020, the City Council adopted its first Climate Action Plan (CAP) which serves as a long-term plan to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from community activities, as well as prepare for the impacts of climate change. One of many GHG reduction strategies contained in the CAP is to “Reduce Energy Consumption, Improve Efficiency, and Install Renewable Energy in New Construction.”
27 Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2
BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Finds that community outreach and economic analysis to support development of a Reach Code is a suitable use of ARPA funds for the provision of government services.

2. Authorizes the appropriation of ARPA funds into the fiscal year 2021/2022 budget as follows:

Fund/Account Description
Revenue
(Increase)
Decrease
Expense
Increase
(Decrease)
264-01952-33132 Appropriate Funds into ARPA Revenue
Account ($50,000)
264-01952-50001 Transfer out to General Fund $50,000
100-03110-36375 Transfer in from ARPA (264) ($50,000)
100-03110-42025 Contract Services $50,000

3. Authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute a Professional Services Agreement with Integrated Design 360, LLC for consultant services to assist City staff in developing a Reach Code in an amount not to exceed $74,543.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 5, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
28 CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 5th day of April, 2022 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Integrated Design 360, LLC.(“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

1. Scope of Services. Consultant shall perform the services set forth in this agreement and shall provide said services at the time, place, and in the manner specified in this agreement. Consultant shall have no power or authority by this Agreement to bind City in any respect.

The Consultant agrees that it has satisfied itself by its own investigation and research regarding the conditions affecting the work to be done and labor and materials needed, and that its decision to execute this Contract is based on such independent investigation and research.

All services provided by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in the Exhibit A, “Scope of Services,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibit B, “Compensation Schedule,” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, outlines the fees and compensation which shall be paid pursuant to this Agreement.

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for 18 months. 29 3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant’s compensation, including travel and out-of-pocket expenses, exceed $74,543 without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

4. Method of Payment. Consultant shall submit monthly billings to City describing the work performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s bills shall include a brief description of the services performed, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, the applicable hourly rate, and a description of any reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than 30 days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.

5. Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform extra work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement. Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, extra work without prior written authorization from City.

6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by City or Consultant immediately for cause or without cause upon thirty days (30) days written notice of termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed up to the effective date of termination, and City shall be entitled to all work performed to that date.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.

7. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees 30 and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

Consultant shall, at Consultant’s expense, provide such reports, plans, studies, documents and other writings to City upon written request. All documents prepared by Consultant are confidential and shall be maintained to preserve their confidential nature. Release of any such documents to third parties shall only be made upon written consent of City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City’s ownership of the Deliverables will not include any ownership interest in Consultant’s preexisting information including, but not limited to, computer programs, software, patents, patents pending, standard details, templates, figures or specifications, or Consultant’s seal, stamp, or certification.

Additionally, except for the Deliverables, all field data and notes, laboratory test data, calculations, estimates, and other documents prepared by Consultant’s will remain the property of Consultant’s. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein will require the alteration, modification, deletion, or destruction of (a) computer back-up media made in the ordinary course of business, (b) one archival copy of the Confidential Information, and/or (c) information required by law to be preserved, provided that any such information is maintained in confidence pursuant to this Agreement.

8. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated for the date of termination or completion of this Agreement. c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any 31 time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. Otherwise, unless an alternative is mutually agreed upon, the receipt of notices in this Agreement.
d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

9. Independent Contractor. It is understood that Consultant, in the performance of the work and services agreed to be performed, shall act as and be an independent contractor and shall not act as an agent or employee of City.

Consultant shall obtain no rights to retirement benefits or other benefits which accrue to City’s employees, and Consultant hereby expressly waives any claim it may have to any such rights. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by Consultant are employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of Consultant and not of the City.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract, and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

10. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s 32 services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

11.Professional Ability of Consultant. City has relied upon the professional training and ability of Consultant to perform the services hereunder as a material inducement to enter into this Agreement. Consultant shall therefore provide properly skilled professional and technical personnel to perform all services under this Agreement. All work performed by Consultant under this Agreement shall be in accordance with applicable legal requirements and shall meet the standard of quality ordinarily to be expected of competent professionals in Consultant’s field of expertise for a project of similar size, scope, and complexity during the time which the Work is provided, and in a similar locality, under similar circumstances (Standard of Care). Reasonable people may disagree on matters involving professional judgment and, accordingly, a difference of opinion on a question of professional judgment will not excuse City from paying for Work rendered, or result in liability to Consultant’s. The Standard of Care is not a warranty or guarantee, and Consultant has no such obligation, express or implied, with respect to professional services. Nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted to require Consultant to perform professional services to any higher standard or have any obligation in the performance of professional services in excess of what is required by the Standard of Care, and this SECTION will control over any contrary provision. NO WARRANTY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED SHALL BE PROVIDED

UNDER THIS CONTRACT, AND CONSULTANT HEREBY SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS

ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
33 12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

13. Licenses. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of whatsoever nature which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Agreement, any licenses, permits, insurance and approvals which are legally required of Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of South Lake Tahoe business license at all times services are performed under this Agreement. Consultant acknowledges that payments made pursuant to this Agreement may be withheld until this provision has been satisfied.

14. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, and employees from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all reasonable costs and expenses in connection therein)(Claims), by third-parties to the extent such Claims are arising out of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligent performance of this Agreement or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out of the extent of Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the 34 acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

This hold harmless agreement by Consultant shall apply to all damages and claims for damages, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operation of Consultant or any subcontractor, regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, or employees.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies.

The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.
37 16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first-class mail and sent via email. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below. Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: Melanie Jacobson, Principal
809 Laurel Street #308
San Carlos, CA 94070

17. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express consent of City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

18. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

19. Dispute Resolution. Any dispute concerning this Agreement will be first submitted to the City Manager or his designee for resolution. If no resolution is reached, such dispute shall be submitted to the City Council. The decision of the City Council shall be final and shall be appealable only to the El Dorado Superior Court pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure §1094.5, and as provided by law.
38 20. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

21. Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any Consultant or person, other than the independent contractors hired in accordance with Consultant’s standard business practice, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any Consultant or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant or an independent contractor hired as discussed above, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

23. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
39 ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under this Agreement or termination of the Agreement, or both, and Consultant may be ineligible for award of any future City agreements if City determines that any of the following has occurred: the Consultant (1) has made false certification, or (2) violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

24. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

25. Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures that neither it nor its principals, is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in covered transactions by any Federal department or agency.

26. Americans with Disabilities Act. By signing this Agreement, Consultant assures the City that it complies with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, (42 U.S.C. 12101, et. seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to ADA.

27. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.
40 28. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

29. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of Agreement between City and Consultant. All prior written and oral communications, including correspondence, drafts, memoranda, and representations, are superseded in total by this Agreement.

30. Execution. This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument and shall become binding upon the parties when at least one copy hereof shall have been signed by both parties hereto. In approving this Agreement, it shall not be necessary to produce or account for more than one such counterpart.

31. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

32. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.

33. Limitation of Liability.
a. Mutual Waiver of Consequential Damages. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, under no circumstances shall either Party be liable to the other, for incidental, consequential, special, multiple, and punitive damages arising out of or relating to this Agreement, regardless of whether such damages were foreseeable and whether or not the culpable Party was advised of the possibility of such damages.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Devin Middlebrook, Mayor Melanie Jacobson, Principal
Date __________________________ Date _____________________________ 41 Business License # ___________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date ________________________________ Heather Stroud, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date ________________________________ Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti-Lobbying Certification
42 EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
43 14

TASKS SCHEDULE ESTIMATE
# Task Name Duration Total Hours
Task 1 - Program Initiation & Project Management 34.0
a
o Project Definition Meeting & Develop Schedule: Organize and attend a project definition conference call with the City staff project lead to discuss strategy and overall project. Assumes meeting prep with Agenda, attend meeting, and deliver meeting minutes and project schedule. 1 week 12.0
b
o Project Kick-off: Organize and attend a project Kick off with City Staff to discuss the project scope, goals, timeline and deliverables. Assumes meeting prep with Agenda and PowerPoint, attend meeting, and deliver meeting minutes. 1 Day 12.0 c
o Progress Meetings: Attend a monthly project meeting with City Staff to discuss progress to date on the Workplan and address any coordination items and technical requirements. Monthly 10.0
Task 2 - Perform and Report Initial Research 40.0
d
o Preliminary Policy Analysis Report: Collaborate with City Staff to obtain relevant permit data of the past two calendar years. Perform an analysis of the permit data and suggest permit type(s) that would be most relevant for application of an energy reach code in the City of South Lake Tahoe. The report will cover relevant state and local building codes and best practices related to building electrification and energy efficiency of new and existing buildings. The report will contain a range of energy saving building policies feasible for implementation in climate zone 16. 1 week 23.0 e
o Presentation, Meeting Materials, and Attend City Council Session: Provide a memorandum summary of the permit data analysis and energy reach code policy summary suggestions for the City Council study session. The style of content will target a non-technical audience without specialized knowledge in energy codes. Provide content for 12-15 PowerPoint slides to support the meeting. 1 Day 17.0 Task 3 - Community Outreach and Develop Draft Policy Criteria 121.0 f
o Industry Stakeholder Engagement Meetings Agenda Development, Marketing, and Technical Support: Attend and facilitate two (2) 90-minute industry stakeholder engagement meetings with local contractors, architects, and building owners for gathering feedback on the energy reach code regulation. For each meeting the following will be prepared: a) community meeting agendas, b) powerpoints, c) "Event Brite" webpage for signup, d) email blast to stakeholders e) correspondance with community members via email as directed by City staff, f) meeting minutes. Assemble results into a summary table and narrative paragraphs to use in the staff report. 8 weeks 18.0
ID360 WORKPLAN: POLICY DEVELOPMENT & ADOPTION
44 15
g
o Community Engagement Meetings Agenda Development, Marketing, and Technical Support: Attend and facilitate two (2) 90-minute community member engagement meetings with local members of the South Lake Tahoe Community for gathering feedback on the energy reach code regulation. For each meeting the following will be prepared: a) community meeting agendas, b) powerpoints, c) "Event Brite" webpage for signup, d) email blast to stakeholders e) correspondance with community members via email as directed by City staff, f) meeting minutes. Assemble results into a summary table and narrative paragraphs to use in the staff report. 8 weeks 18.0
h
o Develop Policy Direction Matrix with 'strawman' model code regulation in Excel and Update throughout Tasks 2 and 3: Using the list of ideal policy requirements from City Staff, create the outline of the policy language to be used as a baseline. The matrix is a tool to house and think through the details of the possible model code language, the interested community organizations, educational aspects, compliance process, related municipal code sections, etc. The matrix will house the costeffectiveness results (developed by others). The intent will be to update and revise the document as the project evolves. Assumes initially one iteration and three (3) round of comments and updates. 6 weeks 26.0
i
o Policy Development, Cost-Effectiveness & Research Support: Coordinate project content to align with the results of the cost-effectiveness study. Cost-effectiveness study to be performed by others. Perform policy research to support the changes to the policy criteria in the local municipal code. Perform State and Federal policy research for amendment to the State code within the municipal code. Communicate with State and Federal agency staff, as needed, regarding the evolving policy development direction. 4 weeks 23.0
j
o Statewide Cost-Effectiveness Study Analysis: Perform policy research and analysis on the results and recommendations from the 2022 Statewide Cost-Effectiveness Studies for New Construction with respect to local stakeholder input. Provide feedback and recommendations on next steps in summary memorandum. Staff to determine if Statewide Cost-Effectiveness Study will be used to justify local reach code or if the City will pursue a localized cost-benefit and economic impact analysis (to be performed under task 6). 4 weeks 17.0
45 16

62.0 k
o Codification Support: Deliver the Final Policy Matrix to the project team. Attend one meeting with City Staff to finalize the regulation requirements in coordination with the cost-effectiveness consultant. The final version in the Policy Direction Matrix will house the final model code language. It is assumed that the final code will be written and approved by the City Attorney. 3 weeks 23.0
l
o Staff Report Writing & City Council Meeting Technical Support for Code Adoption/Public Hearing: Provide technical writing support to assemble Staff Report for model code language. Provide PowerPoint Presentation for Council meeting. Attend one City Council meeting and provide presentation support to City Staff for code adoption. Assumes City Council packet is due six weeks prior to City Council meeting.

Assumes PowerPoint Presentation is due two weeks prior to City Council meeting. 8 weeks 27.0
m
o Submittal to the California Energy Commission: Provide technical writing support to assemble a cover letter to be sent by City Staff to the California Energy Commission.

Work with staff to obtain a wet signature to the City Council approved ordinance. The Submittal to the CEC shall include the Cover letter, Staff Report, Ordinance with wet signatures, and the Cost-Effectiveness Study. Remain in regular communication with the Building Official regarding obtaining notice of receipt from CEC. Work with staff to request assignment of a public comment period and preliminary CEC business meeting date. Note: The CEC will only grant a spot on the Business Meeting agenda after the close of the public comment period. 2 weeks 3.0
n
o Support Staff During Statewide Public Comment Period: Provide technical support to City Staff during the statewide public comment period administered by the California Energy Commission. Address specific questions posed by the CEC and community members during the comment period and before the Business Meeting.

Up to 15
days 3.0
o
o Request CEC Business Meeting Date & Attend CEC Business Meeting by Phone:

Attend CEC Business Meeting, via conference call, to witness approval of local code and to be available to CEC staff immediately following the Business Meeting to address questions. Once approved, work with City Staff to obtain formal letter from CEC for submission to the Building Standards Commission. The City may be required to wait up to 2 months to appear on California Energy Commission Business Meeting agenda.

Assumes 60 Days to complete this task to include waiting time to get on agenda. In the event that updates are needed to the ordinance. 4 Weeks 3.0 p
o Support staff to submit to Building Standards Commission: Support staff to obtain official letter from the CEC to submit to the Building Standards Commission to gain permission to enforce the ordinance. Provide example letter for submittal. 1 week 3.0 q
o Staff Stakeholders List & Coordination Matrix : Work with senior staff to create an internal coordination matrix as a staff management tool to define coordinated efforts for each type of electrical related permit. Document operational procedures and all existing forms, worksheets, checklists and identify new documents to create. Assumes initially one iteration and one (1) round of comments and updates. 1 week 3.0 Task 4 - Local Policy Adoption, State Agency Approval, Rollout 46 17
Task 5 - Permit Applicant Technical Support 152.0
r
o Create a video summarizing the Energy Reach Code & Electrification topic areas: Create technical content, audio voiceover, and editing for a 5-minute compliance video summarizing the energy reach code and electrification related permit processes. ID360 to provide audio content and PowerPoint presentation for video and shall perform editing in Camtasia Software. 4 weeks 41.0 s
o Launch Web Page, Video & News Release: Launch program webpage as developed in Task 2. Work with City Staff to incorporate content, upload guideline, video, and contact info. Provide News Release content for email blasting announcing the new regulation. 1 week 15.0
t
o Energy Reach Code "Green Carpet Service" Technical Support via Phone, Email, and Virtual Counter: Provide initial technical support to building permit applicants and City Staff by phone, email, and virtual counter support services.

Assumes an average of 2-3 hours a week of program support and assumes 2 hours of scheduled "virtual counter hours" each week for the first three months of the program.

Deliver a monthly inquiry log that summarizes program activities. Monthly 25.0 Task 6 - Supplemental Cost-benefit and Economic Impact
Analysis (Optional)

71.0 u
o Supplemental Cost-benefit and Economic Impact Analysis: This task will be executed after Task 3K at the discretion of city staff based on 1) the reach code criteria and items not addressed in the statewide study, and/or 2) feedback requests from community engagement meetings and City Council. The team will develop a custom cost-benefit and economic impact analysis representative of the City's current building development and estimates from local contractors. The study will be performed by TRC as a subcontractor on the project. 4 weeks 71.0
47 EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE
BUDGET
Estimated fees (not to exceed) $74,543
Hourly Rate:

Principal $263.00/hour
Project Manager $167.00/hour
Associate $116.00/hour
TRC Senior Project Manager $185.00/hour
TRC Technical Project Manager $170.00/hour
Travel and out-of-pocket expenses $1,000.00
(travel is included in the TOTAL (not to exceed amount) TOTAL (not to exceed) $74,543
48 TIMELINE
49 EXHIBIT C

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U. S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty not less than $10,000 and no more than $100,000 for such failure.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

1. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; and

2. If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, “Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,” in accordance with its instruction.

Consultant:

Melanie Jacobson, Principal
By:________________________________________
50 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 5
Agenda Item: License Agreement with the California Tahoe Conservancy for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater & Greenbelt Improvement Project
Executive Summary: The Tahoe Valley Stormwater & Greenbelt Improvement Project is located on City-owned and California Tahoe Conservancy-owned properties. Stormwater treatment, mixed-use recreational trails, and public park improvements are proposed on 17 Conservancy owned parcels. The proposed license agreement authorizes use and occupation of the Conservancy parcels as described within the license agreement by the City and general public for a period of 25 years, with no license fee.

Language in the license agreement provides for the option of renewal when the term of the subject license agreement nears expiration.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion to approve a License Agreement between the California Tahoe Conservancy and City of South Lake Tahoe to allow the City and the general public to occupy and use the facilities to be constructed on portions of 17 Conservancy-owned parcels for a 25-year term.

Responsible Staff Members: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager and Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator
Responsible Staff Member: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager, (530) 542-6039 Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator (530) 542-6039 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report_CTC License Agreement.docx
02-Project Location Map.pdf
03-Greenbelt Concept Plan.pdf
04-Conservancy License Agreement.pdf
51 Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: License Agreement with the California Tahoe Conservancy for the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project
Location: Tahoe Valley drainage watershed, inclusive to the “Greenbelt” area located behind The Crossing (AKA “factory stores”) at the South Y and the drainage watershed extending between west F Street down to Tahoe Keys Blvd (see Attachment 02-Project Location Map) Responsible Staff Members: Stan Hill, Engineering Manager and Jason Burke, Stormwater Program Coordinator
Background: City Council adopted the Tahoe Valley Area Plan on June 2, 2015, which includes the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (Tahoe Valley) as a vital environmental and community improvement project. Improvements envisioned with the Tahoe Valley project provide multiple benefits as follows:
 Storm water treatment and stream environment zone (SEZ) enhancement;  Infrastructure related beautification and placemaking projects;  Bicycle and pedestrian improvements; and
 Community park and public space enhancements within the core of the Tahoe Valley town center (Greenbelt area).

Proposed Project improvements will lead to a reduction of pollutant loads entering the Upper Truckee River and Lake Tahoe in urban stormwater runoff and beautification and placemaking infrastructure (including improved community park and public open spaces, walking and biking facilities, streetlights, wayfinding signage, playground equipment, and other park amenities).

Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project planning and design work occurring over the past several years has included coordination with the California Tahoe Conservancy. During the course of development of Project plans, the Conservancy has assisted Public Works with establishing the overall project boundary and limits of improvements. The Conservancy provided $375,000 in grant funding to support the development of Plans, Specifications, and Engineer’s Estimate (PS&E documents) and preacquisition property expenses. Recently, the Conservancy Governing Board awarded to the City, a $550,000 Proposition 1 implementation grant contribution to help fund Tahoe Valley Greenbelt construction expenses.

The overall Project area includes 17 Conservancy owned parcels. The proposed license agreement will allow the City and general public to use and occupy a total of 17 Conservancy owned parcels for a term of 25 years. The 17 proposed Conservancy parcels located throughout the overall Project area are identified within the license agreement appendices.
52 Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2
Issue and Discussion: Conservancy owned parcels located within the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project area include water quality treatment basins, mixed-use recreational trails (bicycle and pedestrian paths), and open space within the Greenbelt public park area. Use of the Conservancy owned parcels is essential to completing the Project. Approval of the proposed ConservancyCity license agreement will provide legal access to occupy and use the Conservancy owned parcels (see Attachment 04- Conservancy License Agreement).

Financial Implications: The City is required to operate and maintain Project improvements during the 25-year license agreement term. The proposed Project improvements provide the City with a significant increase of water quality treatment capability while also providing a major public park upgrade to the existing open Greenbelt area (see Attachment 03-Greenbelt Concept Plan).

Although the City will be required to maintain the Conservancy owned properties and the proposed City improvements during the term of the license agreement, there is no lease or rental cost charged by the Conservancy to use the properties identified within the license agreement.

Maintenance expenses to the proposed water quality treatment basins and mixed-use recreational trail pavement surfaces will be minimal over the first five to ten years or more following construction. Annual water quality treatment basin and pavement surface maintenance costs are anticipated to be an average annual cost of $5,000 to $10,000 per year.

Environmental Considerations: The Planning Commission adopted the CEQA and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Greenbelt and Stormwater Improvement Project on May 9, 2019, SCH# 20190292152. The Project TRPA and Lahontan permitting is currently a work in progress; required permitting will be completed before the commencement of construction.

Policy Implications: Completing project improvements will assist with meeting the sediment and nutrient reductions mandated by the Lake Tahoe Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program. Fulfilling mandated TMDL reduction goals will assist with maximizing residential housing allocations under TRPA Code section 50.5.2.E.2 (Distribution and Administration of Residential Allocations – TMDL Implementation). The Project advances the City Council Strategic Priorities and Goals as follows:
 Action Item 1.4 (Transportation) to prioritize implementation of mixed-use recreational trails and Class 1 bike trails and closing gaps in the bicycle trail system.  Action Item 2.3 (Connectivity) to facilitate implementation of trail infrastructure prioritizing the connection of bicycle and walking trails, from neighborhoods near the Greenbelt to the South Y commercial area and beyond.
 Action Item 5.3 (Infrastructure and Maintenance) by actively seeking funding to develop sustainable infrastructure projects, based on the prioritized capital improvement project list. 53 South Y
Tahoe Valley Storm Water
Improvement Project Area Map
Department of
Public Works -
Engineering Division
Document Path: \\sltpublicworks\public works\GIS files\Projects\Engineering\TahoeValleyGreenbelt\TahoeValleyGreenbeltProjectMap.mxd 12/16/2019 ±
0 500 1,000
Feet
Tahoe Valley Greenbelt Location
Tahoe Valley SWIP Project Boundary
City Boundary
54 55
June 2018

TAHOE VALLEY GREENBELT
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, CA • THE CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE
LEGEND

CITY-OWNED PARCELS IN THE GREENBELT

CTC-OWNED PARCELS IN THE GREENBELT
THE

CROSSINGS

SEATING AREAS
(TYPICAL)

INTERPRETIVE
PATH

WAYFINDING MAP/

KIOSK (TYPICAL)

SHARED USE CL ASS I PATH

WITH USER YIELD SIGN
MEADOW

CROSSINGS

SEZ AND PATH
MEADOW

OVERLOOK

EXPANDED PLAZA/

AMPHITHEATER

FUTURE SHARED

USE CL ASS I PATH

CONNECTS TO

SAWMILL BIKE PATH

STORMWATER

IMPROVEMENTS

SHARED USE CL ASS I PATH

WITH USER YIELD SIGN

SEASONALLY

WET MEADOW

SHARROWS
RALEY’S

SHOPPING
CENTER
CONCEPTUAL PLAN: MOUNTAIN MEADOW

TRASH AND RECYCLING
RECEPTACLES T YP.

PROVIDE ADEQUATE

EMERGANCY TURN-AROUND

ADVENTURE PL AY

AND PARCOURSE

FOURTH ST

THIRD ST

FOURTH ST

MCDONALDS
SUBWAY
CVS
TAHOE
URGENT

MY THAI CARE

CUISINE
KEN’S
TIRES
50’S
DINER
BARTON
HEALTH
TAHOE
VALLEY

PHARMACY

GOODWILL

BONANZA AVE

MELBA DRIVE

JEAN AVE

BARTON AVE

HELEN AVE

B STREET

LAKE TAHOE BOULEVARD

SOUTH AVE
US 50
US 50/SR 89

BARTON MEMORIAL

HOSPITAL
0 200 400
SCALE: 1”=200’

CONCEPTUAL PLAN
56 1
LICENSE NO. 2022-0214-LT-279
Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made on this ____ day of _____, 2022, by and between the California Tahoe Conservancy, hereinafter called “Licensor,” and the City of South Lake Tahoe, hereinafter called “Licensee”;
W I T N E S S E T H:

1. License.

Subject to the provisions hereof, Licensor hereby grants to Licensee a license (“License”) for:

Access onto and through, and construction within, portions of El Dorado County Assessment Numbers: 023-211-010; 023-211-044; 023-231-003; 023-231-010; 023-231- 012; 023-381-001; 023-381-010; 023-430-040; 023-681-001; 032-141-002; 032-141-003; 032-152-020; 032-278-021; 032-278-022; 032-278-023; 023-241-023 and 032-278-024 (“License Area”), for the purpose of conducting surveys, construction and maintaining the Tahoe Valley Stormwater and Greenbelt Improvement Project (“Project”), which includes constructing and maintaining the improvements described in Exhibit A (“Improvements”) and as depicted in Exhibit B, and all activities and incidental activities related to the Project and the maintenance of the Improvements. Access for construction of the Improvements and access for construction of the Project is limited to the License Area.

Licensee may use necessary heavy equipment to dig, construct, backfill, and may use all equipment the Improvements. During construction of the Improvements, Licensee will enclose the portions of the License Area to be used with construction fencing and utilize appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) required for any permits associated with the Project. Licensee may utilize all equipment as reasonably necessary to complete the Project to access the License Area.

Licensee’s right to access and use the License Area is nonexclusive, and Licensor and the public shall have the right to enter and use the License Area for any purpose that will not unreasonably interfere with the rights granted to Licensee under this Agreement. Licensee shall use the least restrictive practices available during construction or maintenance activities to mimize impacts on public access to the License Area.

2. Adherence to the Terms of Relevant Grant Agreements.

The terms of this Agreement shall, at all times, be carried out accordance with all terms of any and all grant agreements and subsequent amendments to such grant agreements entered into by Licensee for any and all projects or other actions to be taken on the parcels listed above that are included in the License Area. In the event of any inconsistency between the terms of such a grant and this Agreement, the terms of a grant shall control. 57 2

3. Term.

The term (“Term”) of this Agreement shall be 25 years, commencing on the date of execution of this Agreement, unless terminated earlier by mutual agreement in writing by all parties to this Agreement or due to breach of the requirements of this Agreement. During the Term, Licensee shall have the right to construct the Project and Improvements, and following completion of construction of the Improvements, Licensee shall be obligated to maintain the Improvements until the end of the Term and pursuant to the terms of any and all grant agreements. The parties may extend the Term by mutual agreement in writing.

4. Access.

Licensor agrees that for the duration of this Agreement, subject to all of the conditions and terms hereof, any employee or agent of Licensee or duly authorized contractor performing construction pursuant to the Improvements may enter upon and use the License Area for the purposes set forth herein.

5. Conditions Precedent to Construction.

In addition to any other conditions contained herein, Licensee shall not begin constructing Improvements within the License Area until Licensee has completed all conditions precendent set forth herein and until Licensee has received all required permits and received required approvals, and Licensor’s Executive Director or designee has approved commencement of contruction in writing.

Prior to construction, Licensee shall provide notice as set forth in Section 6, “Public Notice,” below.

6. Public Notice.

Licensee shall provide reasonable notice to the public of the Project purpose, duration, and limitations of public access. If reasonable public access is inhibited by activies under this License, Licensee shall post signs showing alternate access routes to recreational areas, if applicable. If alternatives access routes are unavailable, Licensee shall provide reasonable notice to the public of the duration of limitations to public access. Licensee shall provide the public with a method for communicating comments or questions to Licensee, and Licensee shall reasonably respond to all public inquiries regarding the Improvements and the Project for five (5) years from the date of execution of this Agreement.

7. License Fee.

There is no fee required to be paid to Licensor for Licensee’s use of the License Area. Licensor has chosen to waive any fee due to water quality and public health and safety benefits of the Improvements.
58 3

8. Expenses of Licensee.

Licensee shall bear the sole risk and pay all costs and expenses of whatever kind and nature which arise from this License, including, without limitation, expenses to reconstruct, repair, and restore the License Area to the same or better condition it was in prior to its use by Licensee, as required by Section 14(B) below.

If Licensor shall have made payments on behalf of Licensee for any costs or expenses incurred herein, Licensee shall reimburse Licensor within ten (10) days from the date such costs or expenses were incurred. Licensor shall have a lien on any Licensee-owned property on Licensor’s property as security for repayment of said amount.

9. Maintenance of Improvements.

Licensee shall be obligated to operate and maintain the Improvements constructed within the License Area through the Term of this Agreement pursuant to Section three (3). Where additional improvements are constructed pursuant to a project funded in whole or in part by Licensor under a grant agreeement provided by Licensor, such improvements shall be operated and maintained in a manner consistent with the terms and provisions of such grant agreement.

Parcels utilized for staging shall be fully restored to natural conditions immediately following construction of the Project and Improvements. Licensor may be excused from its maintenance of the Improvements only upon the written approval of the Executive Director or designee for good cause. “Good cause” includes, but is not limited to, natural disasters which destroy the Improvements and render the Project obsolete or impracticable to rebuild.

10. Qualifications on Use.

Licensee shall neither use nor permit any use of the License Area for any purpose other than that set forth in Section 1 hereof. Licensee will exercise due diligence to not cause any damage while using the License Area and will ensure prompt notification to the Licensor’s Executive Director or designee, if any damage occurs.

Licensee shall not do or suffer to be done in or upon said License Area any act or thing which is or may be a nuisance. Licensee shall not use or knowingly permit others to use the License Area for any unlawful purposes. In the event Licensor determines that Licensee’s use of the License Area is causing damage to the License Area, Licensee agrees to take corrective measures to eliminate further damage. If any damage is caused to the License Area, Licensee agrees to promptly repair or pay the full replacement value of such damaged property to Licensor, at Licensor’s discretion.

This License does not confer upon Licensee any drilling rights or any water or mineral rights or the right to extract or remove any timber existing on the License Area or any water or minerals of any kind or character, including without limitation oil, natural gas, hydrocarbon substances, geothermal steam, or minerals in solution. Unless authorized in writing by Licensor, Licensee shall not destroy, cut, or remove any timber, trees, or firewood standing or lying thereon, or permit others to commit any of said acts on the License Area. 59 4
The License Area shall not be used for displaying signs and notices other than those connected with the use of the License Area contemplated by this License.

Licensee shall, at its expense and to the satisfaction of Licensor, keep and maintain the License Area in good order and repair and in a neat and safe condition. If Licensee shall fail to perform its obligations under this section, Licensor may take action so as to keep and maintain the License Area in good order and repair and in a neat and safe condition and Licensee shall reimburse Licensor for all costs associated with such action pursuant to Section 13 of this Agreement.

11. Prior Encumberances.

Licensor makes no representations or warranties concerning the condition of the License Area.

This License is subject to all easements, leases, liens, conditions, restrictions, encumbrances, and claims of title which may affect the License Area. Licensee accepts the License Area (including, without limitation, Licensor-owned improvements, if any) in their present condition and without any representation or warranty by Licensor as to the condition of such License Area or improvements, and Licensor shall not be responsible for any defect or change of conditions in the License Area or such improvements, any damage occurring thereto, or for the existence of any violation of any municipal, county, State, bi-state, or federal law, order, rule, regulation, or ordinance.

12. Fees and Assessments.

Licensee shall pay, before they become delinquent, all charges, fees, taxes, and assessments imposed on the License Area by reason of this Agreement. If Licensor makes payments on behalf of Licensee for any charges, fees, taxes, or assessments incurred herein, Licensee shall reimburse Licensor within thirty (30) days from the date Licensor provides notice to Licensee of such costs or expenses.

Licensor has the right to post notices of non-responsibility upon the License Area, and to otherwise notify, actually or constructively, any entity or persons supplying services or materials to the License Area that Licensor is not responsible for the cost thereof. Licensee covenants and agrees to keep the License Area free from any mechanic’s or materialmen’s liens claimed by any person, firm, or corporation employed by or on behalf of Licensee for any work or services performed under this Agreement. In the event of the filing of any such liens, Licensee shall cause such lien to be released within five (5) days after Licensor’s written notice to do so. Licensee shall indemnify and defend Licensor and the State of California against any and all liability, cost, and expense including attorney’s fees incurred by Licensor or the State of California as a result of any such lien.

13. Permits.

Licensee shall obtain at its expense all necessary permits and approvals for the use of the License Area. In the event Licensee has not obtained all permits necessary, this License may be 60 5
terminated by either party. Licensee shall adhere to the terms of all permits and approvals applicable to the Improvements and the Project.

Licensee shall seek all permits, licenses, and/or approvals applicable to the repair and operation of the facility as contemplated by this Agreement including, but not limited to, building and/or use permits required by any public body having jurisdiction over the Property.

14. Indemnification and Insurance.

A. General.

Licensee agrees to release, hold harmless, indemnify, and defend (with counsel approved by Licensor) Licensor from and against all liability, cost, and expense (including, without limitation, attorney’s fees, in addition to costs of suit and judgment) for loss of or damage to any property or loss of the use thereof or for injury to or death of any person when arising or resulting from:
(a) the use of the License Area or adjacent property by Licensee, and any agent, licensee, contractor, subcontractor, partner, or any other authorized representative of Licensee (other than an agent, employee, or invitee of Licensor); or (b) Licensee’s breach of any provision of this License, whether or not caused or contributed to by the negligence, active or passive or otherwise, of Licensor, its employees, agents, invitees, or any other person.

B. Environmental Impairment.

Licensee, at its expense, shall comply with all applicable laws, regulations, rules, and orders with respect to the use of the License Area, regardless of when they become or became effective, including, without limitation, those relating to health, safety, noise, environmental protection, waste disposal, and water and air quality, and furnish satisfactory evidence of such compliance upon request of Licensor.

Licensor shall obtain and comply with the terms and provisions of all licenses, permits, and approvals required by any local, regional, State, bi-state, or federal organization with authority to regulate the activities of Licensee under this License.

Should any discharge, leakage, spillage, emission, or pollution of any type occur upon or from the License Area due to Licensee’s use and occupancy thereof, Licensee, at its expense, shall be obligated to clean all the property affected thereby, whether owned or controlled by Licensor or any third person, to the satisfaction of Licensor (insofar as the property owned or controlled by Licensor is concerned) and any governmental body having jurisdiction thereover.

Licensee shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Licensor against all liability, cost and expense (including, without limitation, any fines, penalties, judgments, litigation costs, and attorney’s fees) incurred by Licensor as a result of Licensee’s breach of this section, or as a result of any such discharge, leakage, spillage, emission, or pollution, regardless of whether such 61 6
liability, cost, or expense arises during or after the License term, unless such liability, cost, or expense is proximately caused solely by the active negligence or Licensor.

Licensee shall pay all amounts due hereunder within thirty (30) days after any such amounts become due.

C. Insurance.

In the event that Licensee enters into an agreement or agreements with independent contractors or other third parties other than agencies of the State of California authorizing such parties to enter onto the License Area, such agreement(s) shall require that Licensee’s contractor(s) maintain general liability insurance in an amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or such other lesser amount as shall be reasonably approved by Licensor. In addition, Licensee shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that Licensor, and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, are included as additional insureds under the insurance required above and that a copy of the endorsements or certificate naming them as additional insureds is furnished to Licensor as soon as is practicable. In the event the contractor or third party is unable to name Licensor as an additional named insured, Licensee shall so notify Licensor. Within five (5) working days thereafter, Licensor shall notify Licensee whether Licensee may proceed with authorizing the contractor to enter upon the License Area.

The company or companies providing such insurance shall have no recourse against Licensor and the State of California, and their members, officers and employees, or any of them, for payment of any premiums or assessments under such insurance. Licensor shall also be provided with notice of any proposed cancellation of insurance.

15. Termination or Expiration.

A. General.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this License shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation, or expiration.

B. Surrender of License Area.

Upon completion of construction of the Improvements, Licensee shall discontinue the use of the License Area for construction purposes and, within sixty (60) days, shall remove all personal property of Licensee, including all construction equipment, vehicles, and machinery, from the License Area. Upon completion of construction of the Project and Improvements, Licensee shall restore the unimproved portions of the License Area as nearly as possible to the condition in which they existed at the time of Licensee’s initial entry onto the License Area pursuant to this Agreement. If the Licensee and Licensor do not extend Licensee’s right to use the License Area before the expiration of the term of this License as set forth in Section 3, Licensee’s right to use the License Area for maintenance of the Improvements shall cease immediately. 62 7
Property of Licensee not removed from the License Area within sixty (60) days after the termination, revocation, or expiration of this License shall become the property of the Licensor.

Licensee agrees to reimburse Licensor for the cost and expense incurred by Licensor in restoration of the License Area and disposing of said property of Licensee not so removed. If Licensee fails to surrender possession of the License Area upon termination or revocation of this License, Licensor shall have the right, to the extent permitted by law, to re-enter the License Area and remove Licensee and any person or entity claiming through Licensee from the License Area.

C. Quitclaim of Rights.

In the event that Licensee obtains any form of property rights, as a result of this License, whether land, water, mineral, or otherwise, upon expiration or abandonment of the License Area by Licensee, Licensee shall, within thirty (30) days after demand from Licensor to do so, execute and deliver, in recordable form, a quit claim deed conveying any and all rights which may have been obtained by Licensee.

16. Default.

Licensee shall be in default under this License if Licensee fails or refuses to perform any other covenant or condition of this License.

If Licensee fails to cure a default within thirty (30) days after notice from Licensor to do so, Licensor shall have the right, without further notice and in addition to any other remedies Licensor may have at law or equity, to revoke this License forthwith and to retake possession of the License Area. If, however, the default is one that cannot reasonably be cured within 30 days, then the parties will meet and confer on a timeline for cure and Licensor will not revoke the License so long as Licensee continues to diligently pursue a cure in a good faith effor to meet the mutually agreeable timeline for cure.

17. Nonwaiver.

Licensor’s failure to enforce or exercise its rights under any term, condition, or covenant of this License shall not be construed as a waiver of such rights or such term, condition, or covenant.

18. Attorney’s Fees.

If either party takes any steps or brings an action to compel performance of or to recover for breach of any term of this License, the losing party shall pay reasonable attorney’s fees of the prevailing party, in addition to the amount of judgment and costs.

19. Notices.

Any notices, demands, or statements herein requested or required to be given by one party to the other shall be in writing. Delivery of such written notice, demand or statement shall be conclusively taken as sufficient if and when delivered in person or deposited in the United States 63 8
mail, registered or certified, postage fully prepaid, addressed, if to Licensor at 1061 Third Street, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, and, if to Licensee, to the City Manager, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, with a copy to the City Attorney at the same address. Either party hereto may by written notice change the address to which such notices, demands,or statements may be sent. All payments from Licensee to Licensor shall be made to Licensor at Licensor’s address for notices unless Licensor gives Licensee notice of another address for making payments. Licensor may change by written notice the address where payments to Licensor shall be made.

20. Time is of the Essence of this License.

Time is of the essence of this License.

21. Entire Agreement.

The contents of this License are the entire agreement between the parties, relating to the rights granted and the obligations assumed herein. Any oral representations or modifications of this Agreement shall be of no force and effect unless embodied in a subsequent modification in writing signed by the party to be charged.

22. Modification.

This License shall not be modified except by the written agreement of the parties.

23. Licensor and Licensee.

The terms “Licensor” and “Licensee” as used in this License includes each party’s members(s), officer(s), contractor(s), agent(s), or employee(s), and the successors and assigns of any of them.

24. No Third Party Beneficiaries.

Nothing in this License is intended to create in the public or any member thereof rights as a third party beneficiary hereunder.
64 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate as of the day and year first herein written.

CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

LICENSOR LICENSEE
By: _____________________ By: _______________________________ Michael Steeves Devin Middlebrook
General Counsel Mayor
1061 Third Street 1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
(530) 542-5580 (530) 208-8199
[email protected] [email protected]
California Tahoe Conservancy Contact:

Scott Cecchi
(530) 208-8323
[email protected]
Attest Mayor’s signature:

Seal:

By: ______________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
65 EXHIBIT A
James/Eloise Project Area (north of US50)
Greenbelt Project Area (central)
Parcel Address Proposed Improvements
023-681-001 969 Council
Rock Road
[Exhibit B-1]
Stormwater roadway culvert, and pipe outlet rock apron/dissipater and channel facilities
023-211-010 2208 Eloise
Avenue
[Exhibit B-2]
Stormwater vegetated channel, and stormwater roadway culvert and pipe outlet rock apron/dissipater and channel facilities
023-211-044
2193 James
Avenue
[Exhibit B-2]
Stormwater channel retrofit, and connectivity to proposed vegetated swale (Note: existing Caltrans stormwater infiltration gallery from US 50 storm drain system is located on parcel)
023-241-023 2122 Lake Tahoe
Blvd.
[Exhibit B-3]
Multi-use paved trail connector (Greenbelt entry trail); stormwater open space surface conveyance/treatment area; existing stormwater pipeline retrofit/replacement
023-231-010 2113 Helen
Avenue
[Exhibit B-4]
Stormwater treatment basin and riparian SEZ enhancement, and stormwater pipelines; multi-use paved trail, pedestrian lighting, Greenbelt open space, and recreational trail amenities/site furnishings
023-231-012 2108 Barton
Avenue
[Exhibit B-4]
Stormwater treatment basin and riparian SEZ enhancement, stormwater pipelines and basin outlet structure facilities; multi-use paved trail, pedestrian lighting, Greenbelt open space, and recreational trail amenities/site furnishings 023-381-010 2086 Helen
Avenue
[Exhibit B-5]
Stormwater treatment basin and riparian SEZ enhancement; multi-use paved trail, elevated boardwalk, pedestrian lighting, Greenbelt open space, and recreational trail amenities/site furnishings
023-381-001 N/A – (Helen
Avenue)
[Exhibit B-6]
Stormwater treatment basin and riparian SEZ enhancement; multi-use paved trail, and Greenbelt open space
023-231-003 2070 Lake Tahoe
Boulevard
[Exhibit B-6]
Stormwater treatment basin and riparian SEZ enhancement; multi-use paved trail, and Greenbelt open space
023-430-040 N/A – (B Street) [Exhibit B-7]
Stormwater treatment basin, stormwater channel retrofit, and riparian SEZ enhancement; native soil/DG walking trails, footbridge structure, and Greenbelt open space
66 Bonanza Project Area (west of US50 / SR89)
032-141-002 1100 Emerald
Bay Road
[Exhibit B-8]
Stormwater treatment basin; stormwater inlet/sediment trap, pipeline and pipe outlet rock apron/dissipater, and basin outlet structure facilities; and wood buck/pole barrier fencing
032-141-003 1120 Emerald
Bay Road
[Exhibit B-8]
Stormwater treatment basin
032-152-020 1234 Bonanza
Avenue
[Exhibit B-9]
Stormwater treatment basin; stormwater pipeline and pipe outlet rock apron/dissipater, and basin outlet structure facilities; and wood buck/pole barrier fencing
032-278-021 1177 Margaret
Avenue
[Exhibit B-10]
Stormwater treatment basin; stormwater inlet, pipeline and pipe outlet rock apron/dissipater facilities; and wood buck/pole barrier fencing 032-278-022 1881 D Street [Exhibit B-10]
Stormwater treatment basin; and wood buck/pole barrier fencing 032-278-023 1885 D Street [Exhibit B-10]
Stormwater treatment basin; and wood buck/pole barrier fencing 032-278-024 1889 D Street [Exhibit B-10]
Stormwater treatment basin; pipeline and pipe outlet rock apron/dissipater, and basin outlet structure facilities; and wood buck/pole barrier fencing 67 11"
11"
8"
14"
13"
10"
16" 14" 16"
11"
11" 10"
12"
11"
9"
9"
8" 12"
9"18"
8"
12"
10"14"
11"
11" 9" 9"
6"
8" 9"
8"
10" 9"
12"
11"
36"
8"
14"
10" 18" 17" 11"
16" 9"7"
8"6"
6"
7"7"12"
12"
6" 6" 10"
8"
8"8"
12" 7" 12" 10" 8"
8" 8"
6" 13"6"
10"
0+00
1+00
PI: 0+29.28 PI: 0+12.83
PI: 0+74.91

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=30'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT

INLET/OUTLET
CONTROL (TYP.)
TREE REMOVAL (TYP.)
REMOVE EX 18" SD CMP
INSTALL 23" x 14" RCEP

STORM DRAIN PIPE

INLET/OUTLET
CONTROL (TYP.)

COUNCIL ROCK DR

TAHOE KEYS BLVD
CTC
023-681-001
023-681-002
023-761-014
023-221-020
023-682-014
023-682-013
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 023-681-001

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
B-1
68 X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X X X
X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X X X
X
X
X X X
X
X
X
X X X
X X
X
X X
X
X
X X
X
12"
16"
12"
12" 17"
19"
13"
12" 15"
15"
11"
10"
27"
22"
22"
14"
14"
14" 11"
30"
13"
15"
24" 20"
21" 26" 15"17"
15"
14"
14" 16"
19"
19"
12"
20"
18"
21"
17" 18"
16" 14"
15"
12" 14" 15"
12"
12" 14" 15"
16"
16" 19"
11"
8"
11"
10"
14"
10"
6"
6"
6"
18"p
14" 15"
11"
9" 9"
9"
10"8"
7"
8"
9"6"
10" 7"14"
6"
10"
9"
12"
10"
10"9"
8" 8" 9"7"7"9"
7"7"10" 10"
10"
10"
10" 7"
11"
14"
13"
24"8"
0+00
1+00
2+00
0+00
1+00
1+84
7+50
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5+00
6+00
7+00
1+00
2+00 3+00
???
D
D

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=80'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT

INSTALL RIPRAP

DISSIPATOR

TREE REMOVAL
(TYP.)

CONSTRUCT

VEGETATED SWALE

CULVERT INLET

CONTROL

CONSTRUCT

MEANDERING LOW FLOW

VEGETATED SWALE
CTC
023-211-010
023-211-003
023-211-004
023-211-047
023-211-021 CTC
023-211-044
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 023-211-010 & 023-211-044
INSTALL 34"x22" RCEP

STORM DRAIN PIPE
INSTALL 23"x14" RCEP

STORM DRAIN PIPE

CONSTRUCT

ROCK WEIR
INSTALL 24"Ø

RCP STORM

DRAIN PIPE

INSTALL FLARED

END SECTION

INSTALL FLARED

END SECTION

CONSTRUCT ROCK

LINED SWALE

ROAD SHOULDER

STABILIZATION

AGGREGATE SECTION
023-211-043
023-211-005
023-211-048
023-211-019
023-211-022
023-211-040

JAMES AVE

ELOISE AVE

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
B-2
69 X X
X
X
12"
41"
32"
35"
26"14"
16"
13"
15" 48"
12"14"
12"
14"

EX GAS 8 STL

EX GAS 6 STL

EX SS 8

EX WL 8 STEEL

EX WL 6 STEEL

EX WL 4 STEEL

EX TELE

EX SD

EX GAS 2 STL EX GAS 2 STL
SD

EX SD 18X30
SD

EX GAS

EX GAS
D
D
D
3+00
4+00
7+00
1+00
1+50
PI: 1+33.61
1+00
PI: 1+76.08
1+00
1+50
2+00
2+50
D

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=40'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
023-241-022
023-231-011
CTC
023-241-023
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 023-241-023

INSTALL ADVANCED

WARNING SIGN TRAIL

CROSSING AHEAD
CONSTRUCT 6' WIDE

AC PATH
023-211-040
HWY 50 LAKE TAHOE BLVD.
023-231-019
023-231-018

BARTON AVE PAVEMENT MARKING

CONTINENTAL CROSSWALK
4TH ST

REMOVE AND

REPLACE DRAINAGE
INLET TYPE 2

PORTION OF EXISTING

SD PIPE TO BE

ABANDONED IN PLACE

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
B-3
70 X X
X
X
X
16" 16"
6"
26"
10"
8"
10"
6"
10" 8"
20"
24"
24"
30"
8"
10"
18"
12"
22"
20"
36"
12"
30" 10"
22"
22"
26"
26"
18"
24"
24"
26"
20"
26"
18" 24"
18" 16"
12"
14"
12"

EX GAS 2 STL

EX GAS EX GAS

EX SS 8

EX WL 4 STEEL

EX SS 8

EX SD

EX GAS

EX GAS
SSC

EX SD 15X21 EX SD 15X21 EX SD 15X21

EX SD 60

EX SD 60
60 inch
pipe

EX SD 18X30

SEX GAS EX GAS EX GAS
D
1+00 2+00
3+00
1+50
1+00
1+50
1+00
2+00
2+50
D

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=40'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
CTC
023-231-010
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 023-231-010 & 023-231-012
CONSTRUCT 8' WIDE

MULTI-USE AC PATH

HELEN AVE
BARTON AVE 023-231-011
CTC
023-231-012

REMOVE AND

DISPOSE EXISTING

SD JUNCTION

INSTALL BASIN

OUTLET STRUCTURE

REPLACE EXISTING

BASIN OUTLET

STRUCTURE
INSTALL 30" Ø HDPE

STORM DRAIN PIPE

REPLACE EXISTING SD
PIPE WITH 30" Ø HDPE

STORM DRAIN PIPE
EXISTING 48" Ø

SD MANHOLE
INSTALL 6"Ø

HDPE SD PIPE

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY

INSTALL LIGHT POST
(TYP.)
B-4
023-231-016
71 023-381-010 CTC
X X X
X X

X X X X X X X X
16"
10"
14"
16"
30"
26"
36"
28"
12" 10"
8" 8"
10"
18"
14"
14"
14" 6"
12"10"
8"
16"
6"12"
22"
14"
18"
10" 8" 12" 14"
10"
10"
16"
20"
20"
16"
20"
30" 20"
6"
6"
22"
16"
16" 18"
18"
18"
8"
16"
12" 14"
18"
6" 12" 22"
12"
6"
8"
8"
14"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12"12"
12"
12"
8"6"
12"
12"
6"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12" 12"
30"
22"
24"
20"
26"
26" 22"
22"
6"
22" 20" 8
26"
22"
12"
20" 22"
18"
22"10"
16"
16"
16"
12" 14"
16" 6"
22"
20" 12"
32"
30"
6"
12"
42" EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS

EX SS 8

EX SS 8 EX WL 4 STEEL

EX WL 4 STEEL

EX SS 8

EX SS 8
S S

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=40'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 023-381-010
CTC
023-381-010
12' WIDE AC

MULTI-USE PATH

INSTALL

BOARDWALK PATH

INSTALL LIGHT POST
(TYP.)
TREE REMOVAL (TYP.)

INSTALL ROCK

SLOPE PROTECTION

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
023-381-003
023-381-004
023-381-015
023-381-007
023-381-006
023-381-001
023-231-003
023-231-016
B-5
72 023-381-003
CSLT
023-231-003

CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY
023-381-010 CTC
023-381-001 CTC
023-201-0

CITY OF SLT
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
32" 28"28"
8"
6"
10"
10"
26"16" 10"
14"14"
10"
48"
36"
14"16"
20"
16" 30"
26"
36"
28"12" 10"
8" 8" 10" 18"
14"
14" 6"12" 10"8"
16"
6"12"
22" 14"
18"
12" 14"8"10" 10"
10"
12"
28"
18"
8"10" 28" 6"
24" 28" 22"
12" 22" 26" 20" 10"
14" 8"10" 16" 24" 32"
16" 12" 26" 10"26" 10" 16"
38" 12" 14"
16" 10"28"
10"
28" 16" 10"
24" 20"
22"26" 18" 6"10"16"
24"
32"
10" 28" 16" 6"10"
20"
22"
22"
14"
12"
12"
10"
6"
10"
10"16"
16"
8"
46"
16"
20"
20"
16"20"
30" 20"6"
6"
10"
10" 10"
22"
18"
6"
8"
8"
12" 14"12"
6"
6"
14"
10"
6"
22"
16"
16" 18"
18" 18" 8"
16" 12"14" 18"
6"
26"
12" 18"
18"
42"
6"6"
34"
30"18"
18" 16"
16"16"6"
26" 10"
8" 10"
6"
10" 8"
20"
34"
22"12"
10" 24"30" 8"
30"
12"
16"16"
22"
24"
12"
44"
38"
10"
34"
38"
34"
8"
6"
10"
10" 6"
10"
6"
8"6"
8" 6"
6" 6" 10" 8"
8"6" 6" 16"
16" 12" 10"
38"
40"
46"
44"
8" 6"10"
8"
8"
6"6"
6"
8" 16"
8" 6" 6" 6"
8" 8" 6"
8"
6"
6"6"
12"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"8"6"
6"
6" 8"
6"
12"
14"
14" 26" 18" 20" 16" 24"
6" 8"8"
6"
6" 8"
8"8" 10"
10"6"
6" 6"
10"
10" 10"
12"
14"
6"
12" 12"
10"
8"
8"
8"
6" 10"
10"10"
8"8"
6"6" 26" 40"
16" 6" 20"
8"
12" 8"12" 14"
6" 10"
12"
12"
14"
8"
6"
8"10" 8"8" 6"
8" 10" 8"
8"8"
14" 14"
10"
6" 8" 8"
14"
12"
26"
36"
16" 6"26" 10"18" 24"
18" 16"
12" 14" 12"
12"
12" 12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12"12"
12"
12"
8"6"
12"
6"
12"
12"
12"
12"
12" 12"
12"12"
30"22"
24"
20"
26"
26"22"
22" 6" 22" 20" 8" 26"
22"
12"
20" 22"
18"
22" 10"
16"
16"
16"
14" 20" 12" 32"
30"
12" 6" EX SD

EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8

EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8

EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8

EX WL 4 STEEL EX WL 4 STEEL EX WL 4 STEEL

EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8

EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC EX ELEC

EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE
ET

EX SD EX SD

EX GAS 2 STL

EX GAS 2 STL EX GAS 2 STL EX GAS 2 STL
S S
SD

EX SD 15X21 EX SD 15X21
S
S
S
S

EX SD 36X56

EX SD 36X56 EX SD

EX SD EX SD EX SD

EX SD

EX SD
1+00
2+00
1+50
1+00
2+00
D

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=100'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 023-381-001 & 023-231-003
023-231-004

CONSTRUCT ROCK

LINED SWALE

CTC PARCEL
023-381-001

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
023-231-025
023-381-003 HELEN AVE
023-201-011
023-201-012
CTC
023-231-003
023-231-016
023-231-017
023-231-006
023-231-019
023-231-018
HWY 50 LAKE TAHOE BLVD

CONSTRUCT MINOR

ROCKERY WALL
12' WIDE AC

MULTI-USE PATH
023-381-010
B-6
73 023-081-005 CSLT
023-430-040 CTC
X X
22"
22" 18"
6"40"14"
34" 38"
36"
30" 26"
30"
12"8"
16"
26"
28"
10"
12"
12" 16"
14"
14"8"
10"
12" 6"
10"
8"
8"
8"
6" 6"
24" 32"
28"
28"
24"
12"
6" 8"10" 6"
6" 16"
12"
6"
14"
20"
10" 6"
10"
34"22" 6"
26"
30"
28"
22"
14" 18"
28"
10" 6"30"28"24"32"
26" 14"
14"
8"
8"
12"
6" 6"
10"
8"
6"
8" 12" 10"
34"
30"
16" 14"
12"
28"
12"
12" 28"
24"
14" 34"
20"
18"
12"
10"
18"
12" 16"22"
8"
24"
18"
26" 10"
22"
10"
28" 14"
6"14"
30" 22"
22" 12" 8"
16"
18" 14" 6"
6"
6"
6"
28"
10"
14"18"
6"24"
26"
14"
26"
16" 24"
12"
10" 6"
8"
16" 26" 28" 8"22" 16"
14"
32"
6"
36"
28"
8"
14"
14" 18"
6" 28"
12" 30" 12"
10"
14"
14"
8"
16"
10"
20"
8"
6"
10"
12"
12"
18"
6"
14"
12"
12"
8"
10"
18" 6"22"
28"
38"
34"
24"
10"
36" 10"
6"
40"
12" 38"32"
28"
28"14"
12"
30"
22"
16"
10"
6" 14"
6" 8"
26" 10"
22"
16"
26"
28"
10"
6"
30"
13"
19" 32"
8"
22"

EX SS 8

EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8

EX WL 8 STEEL

EX ELEC

EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE
EV
EV
EP
EP
EP

EX SD 32X48

EX SD 32X48 SD

EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS EX GAS

EX GAS EX GAS
S
W
W
32"x48"D

EX SD

EX SD EX SD

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=100'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 023-430-040
CTC
023-430-040

INSTALL TRAIL SIGN

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
023-430-041
032-191-021

B STREET
023-430-030
023-430-036
023-081-005
CONSTRUCT 8'

WIDE DG TRAIL

CONSTRUCT LOG

DRAINAGE CROSSING

EXTEND EXISTING

OUTFALL CHANNEL WITH

ROCK LINED SWALE
TREE REMOVAL (TYP.)
023-081-007
B-7
74 032-141-002 CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY 032-141-003 CALIFORNIA TAHOE CONSERVANCY 032-141-018 GANYO
032-141-012 MANWILL ESTELLE E (DECD)
032-142-018 WHITELEY
032-142-017 ROMANO
032-142-006 BLACK GARRICK

BLACK ARTHUR A &
032-142-004 ALCORN NATHANAEL E
032-142-003 STEWART BRENDA E
032-142-002
2011 EAST HIGHLAND CA LLC
X
X
X
X X X
X

X X X X X

EX GAS 2 STL

EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6 EX SS 6

EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8

EX WL 6 C900

EX SS 10

EX WL 8 STEEL EX WL 8 STEEL EX WL 8 STEEL

EX ELEC EX ELEC

EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE

EX GAS

G G G G G
G
G
SSC
15"D
SS

EX SD 15

EX SD

EX SD
S
S

EX GAS

EX WL 4 STEEL
24" 6" 28"
30"
22"
32"
15"
15" 30"
8"
24"
6"
18"
21"
7"
33" 32" 34"
34" 15"
10"
10"
6"
7"6"
18"
13"14"
8"17"
10"
11"
10"
19"
9"
11" 10"
9"9"
8"
8"
9"
10"
7" 7"12"
7"
6"7"
8"7"
9"
15"10"
10"6"
9"7" 6"
8"
9"10"
6" 9"
8"8"
10"11" 8"7" 13"12" 14" 8"
15"8" 9"
13"11" 14"14"
13"
12"
9"
9"
11"
10" 12"
13"
15"17"14" 11"
14"
14" 16"
12"
11"
11"
11"
10"
10" 10" 12"
12"
11"
6" 9"
9"
9"
8"9"8"
10"
9"
8"
8"8" 10"
8" 12"
11"
12"
12" 12" 10"
11"
9"10" 8"
8"10"
8" 8"8" 8"
13"
10"9" 8"9"9"10"
11"
10"
10"
13"13"
14"
14" 14"
13"
14" 9"7"
15"
10"
8" 8" 8"9"
8"
8" 8"
7"9" 7"8" 7" 10"
8"
7"9"
9" 7" 9" 18" 17" 6"10"
9"
9" 11"
12"6" 15"
11"
12"
13"
11"
12"
14"
12"
12"
11"
15"
16"
13"
12"13"
11"
14" 14"
16"
15"12"
14"
14"
21"
15"
20"
9"
16"
12" 16"
17" 20"
16" 16" 16"
13" 12"
14"11"
14" 10" 14"
9" 6" 12"12"10" 15" 13" 14"12"
12"
12"10"
17"12"
10"17"12"
10" 17" 9" 14"
9"11" 10"14"
11" 12"
9"12"
14"
11" 11"
14"
15"
14"
16" 17"
12"
11" 14" 15"13"
15"16"
18"
14" 19"
11" 16"
12"
11" 14"
8"
30"
36"
42"
36" 30"
35"
27"
25" 23"
12"
16"
17" 47"
35"
22"
40"
16" 9" 20" 15"
12"
16" 13"
20"18"10"10"11"
11"
17" 13"
22"
160°'

EX GAS 6 PE

EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 EX SS 8 WL 8 STE L

EX WL 8 STEEL

EX ELEC

EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE

EX TELE

EX TELE EX TELE

EX SD 32X48 EX SD 32X48 EX SD 32X48 EX SD 32X48 EX SD 32X48 SD

EX GAS 2 STL EX GAS 2 STL EX GAS 2 STL

EX GAS 2 STL

EX SD EX SD
(SD-L7) 1+00 (SD-L7) 1+50
(SD-M2) 22+00
(SD-M2) 23+00
(SD-M2) 24+00
(SD-M2) 25+00
(SD-M2) 26+00
D
(SD-L8) 1+00 (SD-L8) 2+00 (SD-L8) 2+50
PI: 1+54.73
D (B3) 1+00
(B3) 2+00
(B3) 3+00
(B3) 4+00
(B3) 5+00
(B3) 6+00
(B3) 6+50
PC: 1+39.83
PT: 1+93.38 PC: 2+03.95
PT: 2+40.12 PC: 2+58.38 PT: 2+77.60 PC: 3+06.88
PT: 3+34.35
PC: 3+65.18
PT: 4+15.57 PC: 4+43.94 PT: 5+19.88 PI: 5+41.07
PI: 6+13.25 PI: 6+33.80
D
D
ST

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=100'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
PROPERTY LINE (TYP.)
APN: 032-141-002 & 032-141-003
CTC
032-141-002

INSTALL BUCK AND

POLE FENCE

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
032-141-035
032-141-001
023-081-011

INSTALL FLARED END

SECTION AND ROCK

LINED SWALE

TRANSITION

TREE REMOVAL
(TYP.)

CONSTRUCT BASIN
INSTALL 30"Ø HDPE SD PIPE

INSTALL BASIN OUTLET

STRUCTURE

CONSTRUCT BRAIDED

LOW-FLOW CHANNELS
CONSTRUCT 8' WIDE BERM
INSTALL 18"Ø

RCP SD PIPE

CONSTRUCT

OVERFLOW
WEIR
CTC
032-141-003
032-141-004 032-141-018
032-141-012

EMERALD BAY RD
032-142-001
032-142-002
032-142-004
032-191-011
032-191-021
032-191-002
032-142-018
032-142-017
032-142-003 BONANZA AVE
INSTALL 60"

SEDIMENT TRAP
B-8
75 032-152-020 CTC
032-151-013 CARROLL JOYCE M
032-371-039 SNYDER ELVIN W
032-152-013 ASHBAUGH KATHLEEN M
032-152-021 UNDERWOOD RENEE TR
032-152-006 COTE DAZUR HOMEOWNERS ASSO
032-152
GORU V
X
X
X X
X X
X X

X X X X

X X X X X X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

EX GAS 2 STL

EX SS 6

EX WL 6 C900

EX TELE

EX GAS EX GAS

EX GAS

EX GAS
W W
S
SSC
SSC
GV
17"
23"
25"
15"
16"
35"
28"
28"
3020"
19" 10"
10"
24" 24
9"26"
23" 48"
23"
28"
24"
24"
41" 26"
48"
24"
17"
41"
48"
48"
28" 33"
30"
7"
49"
19"
22" 48" 16" 27"
(B1) 1+00 (B1) 2+00
(B1) 3+00
(B1) 4+00
(B1) 5+00
(B1) 5+50
(SD-M2) 7+00
(SD-M2) 8+00
(SD-M2) 9+00
(SD-M2) 10+00
(SD-M2) 11+00
D
D
D
D
ST

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=50'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
APN: 032-152-020

INSTALL BUCK AND

POLE FENCE

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
032-152-013
032-152-006

INSTALL FLARED

END SECTION AND

ROCK LINED SWALE

TRANSITION

TREE REMOVAL
(TYP.)

REMOVE AND
REPLACE EX. FENCE
INSTALL 18"Ø RCP

SD PIPE
032-151-013
CTC
032-152-020
032-152-021
032-251-016
032-250-015
032-251-014
032-371-039
032-251-013

BONANZA AVE

CONSTRUCT ROCK

LINED SWALE

CONSTRUCT

DETENTION BASIN

INSTALL BASIN OUTLET

STRUCTURE
INSTALL 18"Ø RCP SD PIPE
B-9
76 032-282-054
032-278-024 CTC
032-278-023 CTC
032-278-022
032-278-021
CTC
CTC
032-281-051 HANLEY CHERYL
032-282-001 EPIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS INC
032-1282-056 EICHNERLYNCH JOY TR
032-282-002 DREW JASON R
032-282-055 MOGANNAM OSAMA NABIL TR

X X X X
X
X
X
X X X

EX GAS 6 STL

EX GAS 2 STL

EX WL 8 PVC

EX WL 6 C900

EX SS 6

EX GAS

EX GAS 2 STL

EX GAS 2 STL EX GAS 2

EX GAS 2 STL

EX SD 12

EX SD 12
S
S
W
D 12"D

EX GAS

EX GAS
24"
9"
16"
11" 13"
12"
12" 12"
10" 15"
12"
20"
20"
22"
24"
15"
16"
15"
30" 30"
7"
12"
12"
30"
16"
18"
20"
22"12"
18"
25"
8"
24"
21"
35"
7"
10"
10"
10"
12"
14"
16" 15"
37"
11"
14"
11" 16"
18"
12"
15"
37"
11" 14"
19"
18"
20"
26"34"
(SD-L3) 2+00
(SD-L3) 3+00
(SD-M3) 1+00
(SD-M3) 2+00
(SD-M3) 3+00
(SD-M3) 4+00
(SD-M3) 5+00 D
D
ST

EL DORADO COUNTY CALIFORNIA

TAHOE VALLEY STORMWATER AND GREENBELT
Job No:

Scale:

Date:
1"=40'
11/2021
E3204006000

EXHIBIT RENO
5496 RENO CORPORATE DRIVE
RENO, NV 89511
TEL: (775) 828-4362 FAX: (775) 81-8046
WWW.CARDNO.COM

IMPROVEMENT PROJECT

LICENSE AGREEMENT
APN: 032-278-021, 032-278-022, 032-278-023, 032-278-024

INSTALL BUCK AND

POLE FENCE

CTC PROPERTY BOUNDARY
032-282-055
032-278-019

INSTALL FLARED END

SECTION AND ROCK

LINED SWALE TRANSITION

TREE REMOVAL
(TYP.)

CONSTRUCT

OVERFLOW WEIR
INSTALL 18"Ø

RCP SD PIPE
CTC
032-278-021
032-282-002
CTC
032-278-022
CTC
032-278-023
CTC
032-278-024
032-279-020

DEDI AVE

CONSTRUCT ROCK

LINED SWALE

CONSTRUCT

DETENTION BASIN

INSTALL BASIN OUTLET

STRUCTURE
INSTALL 18"Ø

RCP SD PIPE
CONSTRUCT 3'
BERM
032-282-001
032-277-024
032-278-020
032-278-025
032-278-026
032-278-018
032-279-021
032-282-056
INSTALL 24"Ø RCP SD PIPE

D STREET

MARGARET AVE

INSTALL DRAINAGE
INLET TYPE 2
B-10
77 City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 6
Agenda Item: Agreement for Third Party Plan Review Services for Multi-Generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility with BPR Consulting Group
Executive Summary: After a competitive Request for Proposals process, staff recommends awarding the agreement for third party plan review to BPR Consulting Group of El Dorado Hills, California.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Motion authorizing and directing the Mayor to execute Professional Services Agreement with BPR Consulting Group in the amount of $42,800 with an additional contract contingency of 10% ($4,280) for third party plan review services.

Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvements Manager Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvements Manager (530) 542-6027 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report Recreation Center Plan Review Services.docx 02 - BPR Proposal.pdf
03-Agreement with BPR.docx
78 Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: Agreement for Third Party Plan Review Services for the Multi-generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility Project
Location: 1150 Rufus Allen Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe, CA Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvements Manager (530) 542-6027.

Background:
 July 28, 2020, the City Council approved the agreement for Architectural and Engineering Services with Jordan Knighton of Tahoe City California for the design development of the City’s new Multigenerational Recreation and Aquatics Center.  August 2020 – City and consultant began the preliminary scoping of facility size, location, and program elements
 October through December 2020 – City and Consultant refine and verify programming and conceptual designs through internal meetings, external stakeholder meetings, and public meetings.  January 2021 - Final program is achieved, and Programming Report is generated and distributed to the project team.
 March 02, 2021 – Consultant presents Programming Report to City Council.  August 2021 – Schematic Design Development phase of the facility and site completed.  December 2021 – Design Development Phase of the facility and site is completed.

Issue and Discussion:

Typically, on many City projects, Department of Public Works staff work directly with staff from the Planning and Building Department regarding plan review of city projects. However, the large scale of the proposed Multi-generational Recreation and Aquatics center require third party plan review.

The Multi-generational Recreation and Aquatics Center project is a complex project requiring significant resources to review structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, building envelop, LEED, and energy components for conformity to code.

Recognizing this need, and in discussion with the project team, staff began the process of soliciting qualifications of firms to provide third party plan review services. Staff released a Request for Proposals (RFP) for third party plan review services to the public on January 24, 2022. 79 Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 3
Three hundred and eighty-nine (389) firms specializing in plan review were electronically notified. Forty-Six (46) firms registered as bidders and downloaded the RFP documents.

Electronic submittals were received by the Department of Public Works on February 14, 2022. The City received nine (9) proposals. Table A below lists the firms who submitted qualifications.

Firm Location
1 CSG Consultants Inc Sacramento, CA
2 4Leaf Inc Fair Oaks, CA
3 West Coast Code Consultants San Ramon, CA
4 Shums Coda Associates Pleasanton, CA
5 Interwest Consulting Group Roseville, CA
6 True North Compliance Services Long Beach, CA
7 BPR Consulting Group El Dorado Hills, CA
8 The Code Group (VCA) Orange, CA
9 Bureau Veritas North America Sacramento, CA
Table A – Firms submitting Statement of Qualifications
All submittals received were distributed to the three (3) members of the City’s evaluation team. Each one of the team members independently evaluated, then numerically scored each proposal based on criteria set forth in the RFP. The scores of the evaluators were then added to achieve a cumulative score which provided the ranking.

Table B below lists the scoring/rank.

Rank Firm Cumulative Score
1 BPR Consulting Group 275.0
2 West Coast Code 273.0
3 Interwest Consulting Group 272.0
4 Bureau Veritas North America 257.0
5 The Code Group (VCA) 256.0
6 Shums Coda Associates 246.0
7 CSG Consultants Inc 245.0
8 True North Compliance Services 237.0
9 4Leaf Inc 233.0
Table B – Cumulative Score and Rank
Upon review and scoring of the proposal submitted by BPR Consulting Group (attachment 02) and subsequent discussion, staff has determined BPR Consulting Group is capable, and effectively understands the scope of work required to provide the third-party plan review services for the project as specified by the City. Table C details the cost breakdown by Major Task.

Task (BPR Consulting Group) Cost
1 Initial Plan Review and Comments $21,800.00
2 Second Iteration Plan Review and
Comments
$8,600.00
3 Third Iteration Plan Review and
Comments
$3,800.00
4 Final Plan Review and Approvals $2,400.00
5 Deferred Submittals $6,200.00
Total $42,800.00
Table C –Plan Review Services Cost Breakdown by Major Task 80 Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 3 of 3
Financial Implications:

Anticipating the need for this service, the city appropriated Measure P funds sufficient for this agreement, plus a 10% contingency, into the project account 301-60018-42025 at the FY 21/22 budget adoption
As such, staff is recommending award of a Professional Services Agreement to BPR Consulting Group of El Dorado Hills, CA in the amount of $42,800 and allocate a contract contingency of 10% ($4,280) for third party plan review services for the project.

Environmental Considerations:

To evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the Recreation and Aquatics Center, Ascent Environmental prepared an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Draft IS/MND provides an analysis of the potential for the project to result in significant environmental impacts. Areas of analysis include aesthetics, agriculture and forestry, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use planning, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, utility and services systems, and additional mandatory findings of significance related to potential cumulative impacts. The analysis concluded that the proposed project could have an impacts in the following resource areas: cultural resources, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, tribal cultural resources, utilities and service systems, and cumulative impacts. However, the IS/MND incorporates mitigation measures that would reduce all impacts to a less than significant.

Policy Implications:

The Parks, Trails, and Recreation Master Plan identifies the Recreation Complex Facility and the 56 Acre Plan as recommended projects for the city and the County to pursue. The 2007 56 Acre Draft Plan includes the recreation facility and expanded amenities located in the El Dorado Recreation Area and furthers mutual agency goals to enhance the recreation experience for residents and visitors. 81 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE

PLAN REVIEW AND PERMIT PROCESSING SERVICES

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

RECREATION AND AQUATICS CENTER PROJECT
February 14, 2022
82 2201 Francisco Drive | Suite 140-658 | El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 www.bpr-grp.com
916.562.3600
Safe Buildings for Your Community
Efficient Professional Services
83 2201 Francisco Drive | Suite 140-658 | El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 www.bpr-grp.com
916.562.3600

SECTION A

COVER LETTER
February 14, 2022
Mr. Jim Marino, Capital Improvements Manager
City of South Lake Tahoe Public Works Department
1740 D Street
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
RE: Proposal to Provide Plan Review and Permit Processing Services City of South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Aquatics Center Dear Mr. Marino,
Thank you for the opportunity to present this Proposal, which provides a detailed overview of the plan review and permit processing services provided by BPR Consulting Group (BPR). We appreciate your time reviewing this Proposal and look forward to the opportunity to provide plan review and permit processing services in support of the new City of South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Aquatics Center project. We understand that the City is looking to partner with consultants equipped with the proper credentials, experience, interest, and expertise to perform the requested services. We believe BPR Consulting Group is well equipped to provide the City with the services you are seeking in an efficient, professional and customer focused manner.

Our talented staff of Plans Examiners, Licensed Engineers, CASp experts and Permit Technicians have extensive experience providing all aspects of building department services, including review of capital improvement projects and review of projects for compliance with local City of South Lake Tahoe requirements. As highlighted in our proposal, our staff has provided similar building department plan review services for multiple aquatic center projects including constructability review services when requested. We have worked with public agencies throughout California and Nevada providing code compliance plan review services in support of capital improvement projects. Additionally, we have experience with projects located in snow country gleaned through our work providing plan review services for the Cities of South Lake Tahoe and Big Bear Lake, Counties of Placer and Alpine and the Town of Truckee.

BPR Consulting Group’s staff of experienced building safety personnel provide quality, thorough plan review and permit processing services for our clients. Our staff of qualified professionals and our expertise allows us to quickly and efficiently review complex projects to identify and articulate code deficiencies in a logical, detailed, and thorough manner in support of major building projects. Unlike the large national firms, BPR services are focused on supporting California communities in the delivery of high-quality building department services, tailored to your needs, with the goal of exceeding our clients’ expectations by:
▪ Providing all services in a timely and cost-effective manner. 84 BPR
▪ Providing highly qualified and experienced personnel who have the ability to effectively communicate and explain relevant code requirements.
▪ Utilizing experience gained from plan reviews of similar recreation and aquatics center projects to the benefit of your project.
▪ Effectively communicating with all members of the project team as needed to quickly and efficiently resolve code related project issues.

BPR’s staff of Plans Examiners, Engineers and Certified Access Specialists are all appropriately licensed in the State of California or ICC Certified and are experienced and well-versed in providing the requested services to Building Departments. We believe our past experience providing similar services in support of recreation and aquatic center projects coupled with our highly qualified staff and experience with projects located in snow country will allow us to provide the requested services in a thorough, timely and efficient manner. I will be the primary point of contact for the City of South Lake Tahoe Public Works Department. Roger Peterson will be the secondary contact for the City to ensure no disruptions in service. Our contact information is as follows:

Bill Rodgers, SE Roger Peterson, SE
Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager Plan Review Manager BPR Consulting Group BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658 2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
[email protected] [email protected]
O | 916.562.3600 O | 916.562.3600
C | 916.662.0665 C | 916.202.2902
As a principal of BPR Consulting Group, I am authorized to bind the firm to all commitments made in our proposal and am available to address any questions that may arise during the period of proposal evaluation.

I certify that this proposal will remain valid for a period of 120 Calendar days from the date of submittal.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions concerning our qualifications or the services we provide. Thank you for taking the time to review our qualifications. We look forward to the opportunity to work with you and the City of South Lake Tahoe on this exciting project.

Sincerely,

BPR CONSULTING GROUP
Bill Rodgers, SE
Principal / Project Manager
85 BPR

TABLE OF CONTENTS

S E C T I O N A

COVER LETTER

S E C T I O N B
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..........................................................................................................1

S E C T I O N C
COMPANY HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EXPERIENCE ...........................................3 Licenses and Certifications .....................................................................................................5 Primary Contacts ........................................................................................................................8 Organizational Chart.................................................................................................................9

S E C T I O N D
SCOPE OF WORK / IMPLEMENTATION .....................................................................10

S E C T I O N E
PROJECT BUDGET.................................................................................................................16

S E C T I O N F
DESCRIPTION OF RECENT PROJECTS / REFERENCES .........................................18 References..................................................................................................................................21

A P P E N D I X A

RESUMES
86 BPR

SECTION B

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BPR Consulting Group understands the City desires to partner with a qualified consulting firm equipped with the experience and technical qualifications related to building construction, California State Building Standards and local codes necessary to provide comprehensive and thorough plan review and permit processing services for the City of South Lake Tahoe’s Recreation and Aquatics Center project.

We are familiar with this project. In our previous engagement, we performed and oversaw a preliminary review of this project at the request of John James, Chief Building Official for the City of South Lake Tahoe. We understand the project entails the development of a 10.2 acre site for a public Recreation and Aquatics Center.

The project will include the construction of an approximately 63,000 square foot building to house an indoor lap pool, activity pool, restroom facilities, offices, pool equipment room, mechanical room, electrical room, kitchen, crafts room, gymnasium, and an indoor walking trail. Construction will also include associated site improvements and is set to break ground in June 2022 (civil / utility work) and vertical construction anticipated to begin in May of 2023.

The plan review function will be coordinated with the City’s Building and Planning Department, but the contract will be managed by the Department of Public Works.

The selected consultant team will report to the City’s Building Official and also interact with the City’s Project Manager. We understand that all communication will be coordinated with City staff and the plan review consultant shall not contact the project designers unless directed to do so by the City’s Project Manager. Per the project schedule we understand that plan review services are to commence on April 6th of this year and plan approval shall not be recommended to the City until all code compliance issues have been resolved.

Only professionally qualified staff shall participate in the plan review for this project and assigned plan review staff shall respond to questions related to our plan reviews within one business day. We understand that all plan reviews, including transport of project documents, are to be accomplished via electronic format. Plan reviews are to be accomplished utilizing BlueBeam. The initial plan review is to be completed within 14 business days and subsequent reviews are to be completed within 10 business days. Plan review of all deferred approval items are to be included with our services. All plan review comments are subject to review of the City’s representatives and any noted deficiencies, clarifications or requested changes to our review comments are to be accomplished within 24 hours. We further understand and accept the penalties identified in the RFP for any reviews completed beyond the identified plan review periods.

We believe our proposal demonstrates that BPR Consulting Group is well equipped to provide the City of South Lake Tahoe with the exceptional services you expect and has an experienced and appropriately licensed and/or certified staff that is well qualified to provide the requested services in a professional and timely manner.

We propose to provide a qualified team experienced with similar aquatics projects to complete structural and non-structural plan reviews including plan review of deferred submittals for compliance with all applicable codes including the City of South Lake Tahoe’s City Code.

The BPR Team is
confident we can assist
the South Lake Tahoe
Recreation and Aquatics
Center in meeting its
mission of “being both a
recreation hub for
residents and a
destination for visitors
with flexible spaces which
complement existing
recreational opportunities
in the community."

Page 1 ends

87 BPR
Our key objectives in providing these services to the City of South Lake Tahoe are as follows:
• To provide timely and responsive plan review services with clear and concise comments to ensure an expedient review and approval process.
• To utilize our wealth of code knowledge and experience reviewing other recreation and aquatic center projects to your benefit.
• To be responsive to your specific project needs.
• To provide a well-equipped and responsive staff who have the appropriate experience, certifications, and knowledge to complete the assigned work on time and within budget.

Section C of this proposal provides a brief overview of our company’s background and services offered to our clients. We specify the location of our office which is conveniently located in El Dorado Hills, CA and is in close proximity to the City of South Lake Tahoe. We also list the professional staff we propose to provide the requested services to the City of South Lake Tahoe. As shown, we have a well-qualified team with the appropriate licenses, certifications, and availability to provide superior services to the City of South Lake Tahoe.

In Section D of this proposal, we outline our capabilities and describe our general approach and methodology for providing the requested code compliance plan review service. We describe our customer service policies and procedures and specify our turn-around times which correspond with the City’s expectations. Our role and mission is to provide the following:
• A team of professionals with high-level experience and skills. • A detailed and thorough code compliance plan review to minimize code related issues during construction.
• Licensed Plan Review Engineers and/or ICC Certified Plans Examiners for thorough and timely plan review services.
• Progressive plan review services for this major and unique project. • A high level of customer service to both internal and external customers.

In Section E of this proposal, we specify our proposed fees for this project along with a detailed cost proposal listing staff, title, hourly rate, overhead and incidental costs. Our goal is to provide Services in a cost-effective manner that remain within budget constraints.

In Section F of this proposal, we provide a description of our recent and relevant recreation and aquatic center project experience of which BPR staff members provided plan review services. In this section we have also included references in which we encourage you to contact.

Within Appendix A you will find full resumes for all staff proposed to provide the plan review services as identified in this proposal.

Page 2 ends

88 BPR

SECTION C

COMPANY HISTORY, BACKGROUND & EXPERIENCE
Seamlessly integrating municipal service professionals in support of public agencies is BPR Consulting Group’s sole purpose and the basis on which we were founded. BPR Consulting Group was founded by three experienced veterans of the Building Safety industry with extensive experience providing the same services as being requested by the City of South Lake Tahoe throughout California. The founders of BPR have a 20 year history working together and were largely responsible for the development of one of the largest and most successful building safety firms on the West Coast. Following a private equity acquisition of that firm, BPR Consulting Group was founded in order to maintain our shared values of providing quality services and a very high level of customer service to our clients. Our focus is to support California building departments in a professional manner by providing efficient, timely and professional building safety services for the communities we serve. We have extensive experience providing all aspects of building safety services, including plan review and inspection services for high profile and unique projects. We have worked with numerous public agencies throughout California to provide these same services.

Our Building Safety Division consists of the following: California licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical and fire protection engineers; Certified Access Specialist (CASp) professionals; ICC-certified building officials, plans examiners, inspectors, permit technicians, and highly experienced administrative personnel.

Building department services we provide to municipalities and agencies include:
▪ Building safety plan review services
▪ Building Official services
▪ Building inspection services
▪ Civil plan review and inspection services
▪ CASp plan review and inspection services
▪ Fire prevention plan review and inspection services
▪ Capital improvement plan review and management
▪ Building department support services
Our team has a proven track record of providing efficient and predictable building department services in support of unique and fast paced building projects. Our key objectives in providing these services in support of the City of South Lake Tahoe’s new Recreation and Aquatic’s Center project are as follows:
▪ To provide timely and responsive plan review services. Our well qualified and professionally licensed team of plans examiners will provide you with efficient and timely building department plan review services including clear communication of plan review results. We will work with you to tailor our services to align with your projects schedule and unique and specific project needs. ▪ To utilize our wealth of code knowledge and project experience to benefit your project. Our highly qualified and experienced staff will utilize their combined experience with other similar aquatic and recreation projects to ensure the success of your project. We utilize knowledge gained from our experience providing plan review services for other similar projects to provide reasonable and responsible interpretations of code requirements and detailed reviews of critical portions of the projects.

Page 3 ends

89 BPR
▪ To be responsive to specific project needs. BPR Consulting Group has the depth of staff necessary to complete all assigned plan reviews within agreed upon plan review periods. Our depth of qualified staff allows us the ability to immediately start services upon receipt of project documents for the main project, and for deferred approval items.
▪ To provide staff who have the appropriate experience, certifications, and knowledge. We closely evaluate staff qualifications and experience to align with specific project needs. We understand the importance of assigning plan review staff with the appropriate background and experience to ensure comprehensive plan reviews are provided.

BPR Consulting Group’s staff has extensive experience and proven track record to seamlessly integrate building plan review and permitting services as needed in a cost-effective manner in support specialized and unique building projects. We will tailor our staffing levels to fit the specific needs of this project. BPR has the necessary resources available to provide all of the proposed services to the City of South Lake Tahoe throughout the duration of the project. We do not anticipate using subcontractors to provide any of the proposed services.

Our staff has provided similar building department plan review services for numerous public agencies throughout the State of California including communities such as the Town of Truckee, Cities of South Lake Tahoe, Sacramento, Manteca, Elk Grove, Davis, Woodland, Sonora, Turlock, Visalia, Fresno, Calistoga, Napa, American Canyon, and the Counties of Nevada, Alpine, Napa, San Joaquin, Butte, Shasta, Fresno, and Merced to name a few. Our experience includes plan review of multiple similar indoor and outdoor aquatic and recreation facilities.

Our primary office is located in the Sacramento Region, approximately 78 miles from the City of South Lake Tahoe’s office, our address is 2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762. We have a full complement of licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical, and fire protections engineers, ICC certified plans examiners, and permit technicians, CASp Specialists and administrative staff to provide the services identified in this proposal.

Experience In Climate Zone 16 Areas
BPR Consulting Group has extensive experience providing plan review and inspection services for agencies within Climate Zone 16 Areas with elevations 5000 feet above sea level or higher. We understand the challenges and design features necessary to promote safety and reduce building maintenance requirements for buildings located in snow country. Following is a list of agencies with territories within Climate Zone 16 in which we have experience providing building safety services:
▪ City of South Lake Tahoe ▪ El Dorado County
▪ Town of Truckee ▪ Calaveras County
▪ Shasta County ▪ Tuolumne County
▪ Butte County ▪ Mariposa County
▪ Yuba County ▪ Madera County
▪ Nevada County ▪ Fresno County
▪ Placer County ▪ Tulare County
▪ Alpine County ▪ Mono County

Page 4 ends

90 BPR
Licenses and Certifications of Proposed Staff
The following table shows the licenses and certifications currently held by BPR staff proposed to provide building plan review and permitting services to the City of South Lake Tahoe. For complete resumes please see Appendix A.

Name Current Licenses and Certifications Number(s)
Bill Rodgers, SE
Principal
Project Manager
Sr. Structural Engineer
Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
S4198
C50673
CE18427
SE18427
Roger Peterson, SE
Principal
Plan Review Manager Sr.

Structural Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
ID Registered Professional Civil Engineer
ID Registered Professional Structural Engineer
C46096
S3846
C8225
S8225
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO, ICC
Principal
Director of Client Services,
Sr. Structural Engineer
Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Structural Engineer
NV Registered Professional Civil Engineer
NV Registered Professional Structural Engineer
CABO Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Building Inspector
C39404
S3632
CE019992
SE019992
1492
801789
801789
801789
801789
David Castillo, ME/FPE
Mechanical Engineer
Fire Protection Engr.

CA Registered Professional Mechanical Engineer
CA Registered Fire Protection Engineer
M31455
FP2013
Jerome Schreiber, EE, ICC
Electrical Engineer
Plan Review
CA Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
HI Registered Professional Electrical Engineer
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
EE12290
EE13259
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
879275
Rick Maddox, ICC
Electrical Plan Review
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Master Electrician (NV)
ATC 20 Post Disaster Training
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
848507
000-001221

Page 5 ends

91 BPR
Andrew Burke, CASp, ICC
Certified Access Specialist
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
ICC Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Permit Technician
CASp-710
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
8250398
Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC
Building Official
Project Manager
Plan Review
Inspection
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Plumbing Code UPC
ICC Building Inspection
ICC Plumbing Inspection
ICC Plans Examiner
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
8005399
Mark Berg, ICC
ICC Master Code
Professional
Fire & Life Safety Review
ICC Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Building Inspector
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Certified Fire Code Official
ICC Certified Fire Marshal
ICC Combination Dwelling Inspector - Uniform Codes
ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Fire Code Specialist
ICC Fire Codes and Standards
ICC Fire Inspector I
ICC Fire Inspector II
ICC Fire Plans Examiner
ICC Master Code Professional
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC Permit Specialist
ICC Permit Technician
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Residential Energy Inspector/Plans Examiner
ICC Residential Plans Examiner
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
859362
Daniel Garcia, PE, REA,
CPP
Civil Engineer
CA Registered Professional Civil Engineer 45710
Rick Walters, CASp,

LEED, CBO, ICC
Certified Access Specialist
Building Official
Plan Review
Inspection
Certified Access Specialist
ICC Certified Building Official
ICC Building Code Official
ICC Building Code Specialist
ICC Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Building Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Electrical Inspector
ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
ICC CA Commercial Plumbing Inspector
CASp-439
1061008
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-doPage 6
92 BPR
ICC Building Plans Examiner
ICC Electrical Inspector
ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
ICC Plumbing Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Electrical Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Mechanical Inspector
ICC CA Residential Building Inspector
ICC Building Inspector
ICC CA Commercial Combination Inspector
ICC CA Residential Combination Inspector
ICC Commercial Combination Inspector
CA LEED Certified
LEED AP BD+C
IAPMO Certified Plumbing Inspector
IAPMO Certified Mechanical Inspector
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do1061008
10436985
10436985
030666
090146
Stacy Barker, ICC
Permit Technician
ICC Certified Permit Technician 8821141

Page 7 ends

93 BPR
Primary Contacts / Service Liaisons
As requested in the RFP, we have identified two individuals who will be responsible for all communications with the City of South Lake Tahoe. BPR’s liaisons for all projects for the City of South Lake Tahoe are as follows:

Bill Rodgers, SE // Principal // Project Manager: Bill will serve as Principal-inCharge / Project Manager for services. Bill has over 30 years of experience in the field of structural engineering, including over 20 years of experience as a plan review engineer. Bill has worked closely with Building Departments across the State of California and Nevada for nearly 20 years and has assisted government agencies with numerous projects throughout the years. His wealth of experience includes managing plan review services throughout California and Nevada on behalf of public agency clients and performing structural plan review for commercial and residential projects. In addition to providing structural plan review services, Bill is responsible for the production and performance of BPR’s offices, including maintaining client relationships. Bill’s contact information is as follows:

Bill Rodgers, SE
BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Phone: 916.662.0665 | Email: [email protected]
Roger Peterson, SE // Principal // Plan Review Manager: Roger will serve as Plan Review Manager and the secondary contact for the City of South Lake Tahoe.

He is a registered Structural Engineer, and an experienced building safety professional with over 34 years of experience in structural design and plan review. He has designed and provided plan review services for multi-story steel and concrete-framed buildings, as well as single-story structures utilizing steel, concrete, timber, and masonry framing systems. Roger’s design experience includes schools, commercial and industrial projects, micro-chip production facilities, power plant installations and multi-family residential projects. He currently manages numerous high-profile plan review and inspection services for multiple public agency clients. Roger utilizes his detailed code knowledge, extensive design experience and on-site construction project experience to ensure accurate, thorough, and timely constructability review of project documents on behalf of municipal client agencies.

Roger’s contact information is as follows:

Roger Peterson, SE
BPR Consulting Group
2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Phone: 916.202.2902 | Email: [email protected]

Page 8 ends

94 BPR
Project Staff Organizational Chart
Below is the team proposed and available to serve the City of South Lake Tahoe. BPR is experiencing steady and consistent growth and anticipate adding staff in the very near future to supplement the disciplines below.

Note: *The team members shown with initials are pending transition to our team.

Detailed resumes of staff are found in Appendix A.

Principal-in-Charge / Project Manager
Bill Rodgers, SE
Fire Plan Review
Dave Castillo, ME/FPE
Building Plan Review
Bill Rodgers, SE-Struct.

Roger Peterson, SE-Struct.

Ron Beehler, SE/CBO
Dave Castillo, ME
Jerome Schreiber, EE
Rick Maddox, ICC
Mark Meyers, CBO/ICC
Mark Berg, ICC
Andrew Burke, ICC/CASp
Rick Walters, ICC/CASp. ICC
Permit Technician
Stacey Barker, ICC
Civil /Site Review
Daniel Garcia, PE, REA, CPP
Principal / Plan Review Manager
Roger Peterson, SE

Page 9 ends

95 BPR

SECTION D

SCOPE OF WORK / IMPLEMENTATION
The BPR team holds extensive experience and a proven track record of providing building department services in a cost-effective manner. Our plan review services focus on providing timely and thorough plan reviews with the goal of approving code compliant plans to avoid code related issues during the construction process. In coordination with the City of South Lake Tahoe, we can work with the design team to address any code compliance issues during the design process resulting in quick approval of the final construction documents.

Below you will find our general approach to providing building plan review and permitting services. This will be refined to address the specific requirements of the City’s Recreation and Aquatic Center Project.

Plan Review and Permitting Services
All plans examination services will be performed under the direction of our Project Manager, Bill Rodgers. Bill will be supported by a team of licensed structural, civil, mechanical, electrical, and fire protection engineers, ICC certified plans examiners and CASp experts possessing the necessary experience and certifications to perform complete structural and non-structural construction document plan review on a project of this type and scope. At a minimum, two contacts will be designated to handle all communications with the City to ensure no disruptions occur in the absence of the primary contact. When needed to meet aggressive schedules and peak workload demands, additional support will be provided by appropriately qualified staff.

BPR will furnish our staff with all of the necessary materials, resources and training to perform the necessary plan review services, including a copy of applicable City amendments, policies, forms, and procedures. Our plans examiners maintain a working knowledge of applicable building codes and plan review procedures and will perform detailed plan reviews to provide complete and accurate construction documents to minimize questions and problems during the construction phase of projects. Our team will use their experience and skills to promote efficient services on behalf of your department. BPR has the ability to send and receive all documents associated with digital plan reviews.

Per the RFP, we understand that the City is requesting plan review comments and/or redline documents be provided to expedite clearing discrepancies and approvals. It is the intent to provide expedited and complete plan review and permitting services for this project. Our staff will coordinate all communications with the City’s representative(s) in a collaborative and professional manner to quickly identify and resolve code compliance issues. Unless requested to do so by the City’s representative(s), our team will not reach out directly to the design team. Plan review comments will be completed in a format provided by the City. At the completion of each plan review iteration, draft copies of the plan review comments will be emailed to the City’s Building Official for review and quality assurance approval. Any requested changes or revisions to the plan review comments are to be completed within 24 hours after the quality assurance review by the City. At the completion of the plan review process BPR will submit one complete digital file or paper sets of all final review documents bearing BPR’s plan review stamps, annotated as approved, to the City of South Lake Tahoe Development Services Department. Approval will not be recommended until all code compliance issues are either redlined or formally resolved and all permit issuance requirements of the City Building Division and the Department of Public Works are satisfied. It is understood that code interpretations are subject to final review and approval by the City Building Official.

Page 10 ends

96 BPR
BPR’s staff understands the importance of providing quick, efficient, and consistent plan review services to enable building projects to start construction as quickly as possible which is critical for the economic impact projects may have to the City, and is especially critical due to the regions short building season. BPR will complete plan reviews in a timely manner and within the time-frames established by the City and as documented in this proposal below. BPR’s staff will be available within one business day to respond to questions from the City which may be generated during the plan review process. Our staff will be available for teleconferences at the request of the City.

Plan review services for the City’s Recreation and Aquatics Center project shall be performed remotely and staff is equipped to perform digital plan review of plans and supporting documents using Bluebeam Revu. Should paper submittals need to be submitted, we will arrange for all pick-up and delivery of the plan review documents from your office at no additional cost. BPR will track all plan review activity and will communicate data required to reflect turnaround times, the number of submittals required to obtain approval, and the status of submittals at the request of the City.

Technical Plans Examination Capabilities
BPR’s staff possesses significant technical capabilities in all areas of plans examination competency gained from years of experience providing these same services. All plans examiners are California Licensed Engineers or ICC Certified Plans Examiners with multiple years of experience providing plan review services. Our staff will conduct accelerated or project-specific, phased, plan reviews on an as-needed basis as requested by clients.

Our plans examiners have a thorough understanding of code requirements, are able to read, understand and interpret construction documents, energy calculations, geotechnical reports, structural calculations, electrical load calculations, comissioning reports, and other associated design documents. Our plans examination staff have the ability to prepare well-written, plan review letters, communicate effectively orally and in writing and work effectively with jurisdiction staff, project design teams, and contractors. Our plans examiners posess knowledge of the most current state adopted building standards.

Architectural
BPR’s non-structural plans examiners have provided plan review services for a vast array of projects including large residential, commercial, institutional, industrial, retail, and OSHPD 2, 3 and 5 medical office buildings.

Many of our plans examiners are CASp certified. Completed plan review projects range from single-story, residential projects to complex high-rise buildings and numerous building additions and remodels. We are experienced and familiar with the use and application of the most current editions of the following model codes:
▪ California Building Standards Code
(Title 24) Parts 1 through 6 and 9
▪ International Building Code (IBC)
▪ Americans with Disabilities Act Standards
for Accessible Design
▪ ANSI Standards
▪ NFPA Codes & Standards
▪ CA Code of Regulations (CCR) Titles 19 and 25
▪ Jurisdiction-Adopted Amendments or Ordinances

Page 11 ends

97 BPR
Structural
Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing building projects subjected to the significant snow and wind loads as necessitated by the climate in South Lake Tahoe. Our structural engineers have reviewed all types of projects including residential, multi-family, commercial, and multi-story projects including mid-rise and high-rise projects, institutional projects, industrial projects, retail buildings, schools, medical office buildings and court facilities.

Our structural engineers have experience designing and reviewing projects constructed with all building materials including the following:
▪ Wood
▪ Reinforced Masonry
▪ Heavy Timber / Timber Frame / CLT
▪ Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete
▪ Stressed Skin Panels
▪ Structural Steel
▪ Light Gauge Steel Framing
▪ Straw Bale
▪ Rammed Earth
▪ Insulated Concrete Forms, (ICF)
Our engineers have designed or reviewed a wide array of structural lateral force resisting systems including:
▪ Structural steel moment frames
▪ Buckling-restrained braced frames
▪ Eccentric braced frames
▪ Concentric braced frames
▪ Concrete moment frames
▪ Wood shear wall systems
▪ Masonry shear wall systems
▪ Concrete shear wall systems
▪ Cantilevered column systems
▪ Pre-stressed and post-Tensioned Concrete
▪ Various proprietary lateral force resisting
systems
Our structural engineers and inspectors are experienced with the provisions of most model codes including current versions of:
▪ CCR Title 24, Part 2, Volumes 2 & 2.5
▪ International Building Code (IBC)
▪ AISC 341, 358 and 360
▪ ASCE 7
▪ ASCE 41
▪ AISI Standards for Cold Formed Steel
▪ Jurisdiction adopted amendments
▪ ANSI / AF&PA NDS for wood framing
▪ ACI 318
▪ ACI 530 / TMS 402/602
▪ CA Historic Building Codes
▪ CA Existing Building Codes
▪ NEHRP
Mechanical, Plumbing & Electrical
BPR’s Mechanical and Electrical Engineers are well versed in the California Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical codes. We will review submitted design documents to ensure compliance to the current edition of the following codes:
▪ California Building Code
▪ California Residential Code
▪ California Plumbing Code
▪ California Mechanical Code
▪ California Electrical Code
▪ Jurisdiction adopted amendments
Specialty plan review services may be provided utilizing the most current editions of national standards including the following:
▪ International Building Code
▪ International Residential Code
▪ International Mechanical Code
▪ International Plumbing Code
▪ NFPA Standards 20 (fire pumps)
▪ NFPA Standards 72 (fire alarms)
▪ NFPA Standards 99 (medical gases)
▪ NFPA 101 Life Safety Code

Page 12 ends

98 BPR
▪ NFPA Standards 13 (automatic fire
sprinkler systems)
▪ NEHRP Requirements for Existing
Building
Energy Compliance
Our engineers and plans examiners are up to date on all California Energy Code requirements as they relate to both new and remodel construction for all project types. Our staff have experience verifying CA Energy Code requirements for projects located within climate zone sixteen. The Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Buildings were established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. These standards have been updated since that time to address a multitude of building components, systems and equipment with the goal of having new and updated buildings be more energy efficient, comfortable for building occupants, and less reliant of fossil fuels.

Green Building Standards
BPR’s staff has a working knowledge of the proper incorporation of CALGreen building criteria into project designs and the resulting potential impact of these standards related to building code compliance and the environment. Our plans examiners will review project documents to verify compliance with adopted Green Building Code Standards as required by state law and local amendments and ordinances.

Access Compliance & CASp Review
All BPR CASp-certified professionals are knowledgeable of state and federal accessibility laws and regulations and possess the expertise necessary to promote access to facilities for persons with disabilities. Our staff are experts in the industry, maintaining appropriate certifications demonstrating their expertise, and are experienced providing services for building departments in a seamless manner balanced and in coordination with our client’s expectations and needs. We work collaboratively with our clients to address accessibility plan review and inspection related issues as efficiently as possible.

Our plans examiners are fully trained and familiar with CA Building Code Accessibility requirements and ADA compliance requirements and are available for plan review and/or inspection services. We offer support to municipalities for compliance enforcement and/or developing transition plans. We can assist our clients in researching and providing interpretations of various specific issues related to access compliance including access compliance obligation, transition plan development, construction costs and phasing, and regulation interpretations.

Fire Code Plan Reviews
We have an experienced and licensed professional Fire Protection Engineer on staff to address your fire and life safety needs. Our fire safety plan review and inspection staff can quickly and accurately check plans for compliance with applicable fire codes and standards. Our fire protection staff routinely review and inspect projects for compliance with fire and life safety regulations.

Our Fire Plans Examiners and Inspectors have extensive experience in the use and application of the following model codes, standards, and regulations:
▪ California Fire Code (CFC) and California Building Code (CBC), with local amendments and regulations. ▪ Adopted National Fire Protection Standards
▪ California Health and Safety Code
▪ Appropriate listings (CSFM, U.L., etc.) for common systems and materials

Page 13 ends

99 BPR
▪ Fire Department Standards
▪ Code referenced National Fire Protection Reference Standards ▪ Municipal, State or Federal regulations enforced by local Fire Agencies BPR’s staff is active with California Fire Prevention Officer’s Association, as well as local chapters of International Code Council Building Officials Organizations throughout the State of California.

Electronic Plan Review
BPR Consulting Group is experienced with the City of South Lake Tahoe’s Google Drive-based electronic document transfer system and proposes to work with the City and use this system as requested. We do, however, maintain an efficient ShareFile-based, electronic document, submittal system for receiving and sending large electronic document files.

We will establish a unique distribution email address to which the City can send notifications and correspondence.

We will review electronic submittals utilizing Bluebeam, and can easily supplement our comment lists with snapshots of redlines to facilitate the plan review process and efficiently communicate our comments, where necessary.

Final electronic documents will be stamped in Bluebeam, flattened, and returned to the City via the Google Drive link or our ShareFile portal.

Plan Review Completion Timeframes
We complete all plan reviews in a timely manner and within time-frame guidelines established by the City. As noted in the RFP, we will meet or exceed the City’s timeframe to return a list of comments to the City and/or approval notification within fourteen (14) business days on the first review and maximum ten (10) business days on subsequent reviews. All plan check comments are subject to approval by the City and all requested revisions must be completed within twenty-four 24 hours after quality assurance review by the City. In the event the review is completed and returned to the City delinquent one (1) to five (5) days in excess of the due date, a 10% reduction in cost to the City shall be provided. If the review is completed and returned to the City delinquent six (6) to ten (10) days in excess of the due date, a 20% reduction in cost to the City shall be provided.

If the response time exceeds ten (10) days in excess of the due date, the plan review shall be completed at no cost to the City.

Communicating Plan Review Results
Plan review comments, when necessary, will be typewritten into the City’s Excel-based comment list format.

The comments will refer to specific details, drawing or supporting document, and will reference applicable code sections. BPR will provide a clear, concise, and thorough plan review letter itemized by specific discipline such as life safety, accessibility, structural, plumbing, mechanical, etc., that can be efficiently utilized by clients, designers, contractors, and owners to understand the noted deficiency and make necessary corrections to the project documents. At the completion of each plan review cycle, BPR Consulting Group will return a copy of the plan review comment letter to the Building Official for review. BPR’s staff will not contact the designer directly unless directed by the Building Official. When necessary, in order to facilitate plan review approval, we will

Page 14 ends

100
BPR
participate in meetings with City staff to discuss possible code compliant solutions to challenging design issues.

BPR staff shall be available for teleconferences at the request of the City and shall be available within one business day to respond to questions from the City that may be generated during the plan review process.

Upon completion of the plan review process, we will return completed plan review documents, in either hard copy or electronic format as required, bearing BPR’s plan review stamps and ready for final approval and permit issuance. If requested our staff, will update the City’s permit tracking system and coordinate with other City departments to ensure all applicable entities have approved the project for permit issuance. Our final transmittal will indicate any deferred submittals, special inspection forms, etc. to be submitted to the Building Department during construction. BPR’s staff will also communicate all data as required to issue a Certificate of Occupancy as specified in CBC 111.1. on a form provided by the Building Department. Recommendation of approval will not be issued to the Building Official until all code compliance issues have been resolved and all building code issuance requirements have been satisfied.

Code Interpretations
We understand that all code interpretations are subject to final review and approval by the Building Official.

BPR Consulting Group’s engineers and plans examiners will provide unbiased recommendations, code research, and background information to assist the Building Official to make an informed code compliant determination. We further understand that all plan review comments are subject to review and approval by the Building Department.

Customer Service | Responsiveness
BPR Consulting Group’s staff is always available and willing to discuss plan review issues for projects that we have reviewed with Building Department staff, applicants, designers and contractors via in-person or electronic meetings, telephone, or e-mail as required to resolve plan review related issues. We maintain Microsoft Teams, Zoom and GoTo Meeting accounts in order to foster efficient communication with project proponents who may be located outside the South Lake Tahoe area. Voice mails, e-mails will be responded to the same day they are received if possible, always within 24 hours.

When we are notified that a plan review project has been assigned to us, BPR’s staff will acknowledge the notice immediately, always within 24 hours. BPR’s staff will be available within one business day to respond to questions from the Building Official or inspection staff which may be generated during field inspections of projects which were reviewed by BPR staff.

Permit Technician Services
Permit technician services are crucial to the success of the project’s permit processing. The ability to properly route plans to various plans examiners for review, track submittals, track approvals, database management and issuance of final documents are all critical to the success of your project. We understand that the ability to maintain a smooth flow of permit documents between the City and consultant staff and maintain accurate and up-to-date records, are key elements to furnishing first-rate, efficient success of the project.

Our Permit Technicians will provide information about plan review status, will be organized and have the ability to maintain filing systems necessary for tracking the permits, plan check progress, approved project documents, deferred approvals and any other records or information important to the efficient permitting of your project.

Page 15 ends

101
BPR

SECTION E

PROJECT BUDGET
For complete building department plan review services as outlined in our proposal we propose a total fee of $42,800.00 for all plan review services to be paid as noted in the table below:

Item
No.

Item Description Qty. Unit
of
Meas.

Unit Price Item Bid
Total
Deliverables
Plan Review and Permitting Services – Recreation and Aquatics Center 1 Initial Plan Review
and Comments 1 LS $21,800.00 $21,800.00 Plan Review Comments 2 Second Iteration
Plan Review and
Comments
1 LS $8,600.00 $8,600.00 Plan Review Comments
3 Third Iteration
Plan Review and
Comments (if
required)
1 LS $3,800.00 $3,800.00 Plan Review Comments
4 Final Plan Review,
Approvals 1 LS $2,400.00 $2,400.00 Final Stamped Documents 5 Deferred
Submittals 1 LS $6,200.00 $6,200.00 Plan Review Comments / Final Stamped Documents Our proposed fixed fee unit price for plan review services for Items 1, 2, 3 and 4 will be billed at the completion of the identified plan review phase. We propose that plan review services for Item 5, deferred submittals, be bill monthly on an hourly time and materials basis using the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates included below with a not-to exceed budget of $6,200 as shown in the table above.

Additional services not included within our proposed scope of services will be billed monthly on an hourly basis using the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates included below. Additional services will include the following:
▪ Review of major design changes or revisions to project documents during the plan review process. ▪ Review of changes or revisions to drawings after BPR Consulting Group has approved the documents for construction.
▪ Meeting attendance at the City’s office, job site, or at the design team’s offices. ▪ Review of construction phase plan changes including revisions to approved plans, review of construction related repairs, RFI’s and change orders.

Page 16 ends

102
BPR
Proposed Hourly Rates for Personnel
Hourly rates for personnel designated in the RFP are shown below:

Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates
Staff Title Hourly Rate
Bill Rodgers, SE Project Manager / Sr. Struct. Engr $145 Roger Peterson, SE Plan Review Mgr. / Sr. Struct. Engr/ $140 Ron Beehler, CBO, SE Sr. Structural Engineer $140
Dave Castillo, ME, FPE Mechanical Engr. / Fire Protection Engr. $135 Jerome Schreiber, EE, ICC Electrical Engineer $135
Rick Maddox, ICC Electrical Plans Examiner $105
Andrew Burke, CASp, ICC ICC / CASp Plans Examiner $105
Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC ICC Plans Examiner $105
Mark Berg, ICC, Master Code Prof. ICC Plans Examiner $105 Dan Garcia, PE, REA, CPP Sr. Civil Engineer $135
Rick Walters, CASp, ICC, CBO, LEED ICC / CASp Plans Examiner $105 Stacy Barker Permit Technician / Admin. Support $70
Overhead: Overhead costs are included in the fees and rates shown in the tables above.

Incidental Costs: Incidental costs are included in the fees and rates in the tables above.

Shipping: There is no charge for shipping.

Travel for Meetings: There will be no mileage charges for BPR staff to attend meetings at the City of South Lake Tahoe.

Penalty for Delinquent Plan Reviews
BPR understands and agrees to the penalties assessed by the City due to delinquent plan reviews. The penalties for delinquent plan reviews are as follows:

Number of Days Project is Delinquent Reduction of Fee
One (1) to five (5) Days 10%
Six (6) to ten (10 Days 20%
In excess of ten (10) days 100%

Page 17 ends

103
BPR

SECTION F

DESCRIPTION OF RECENT PROJECTS / REFERENCES
Below you will find a sampling of completed projects similar in nature followed by client references. Additional project profiles as well references can be provided upon request.

Project Experience
BPR Consulting Group’s staff have many years of experience providing plan review for all types of projects ranging from small, simple, tenant-improvement projects to commercial, industrial, mid and high-rise building projects. We review all submitted project documents as needed to verify building code compliance. We have the ability to assign plans examiners with the same qualifications and professional licenses as required for project designers which allows efficient professional communication of plan review related issues. We believe this approach affords a minimum number of plan review cycles allowing projects to move to construction without unnecessary plan review related delays.

The following is a small sampling of projects, which are similar in nature to the City of South Lake Tahoe Recreation and Aquatics Center Project, for which BPR’s staff have provided plan review services.

Great Wolf Lodge ꞁ MANTECA, CA
BPR Consulting Group’s staff provided full plan review
services for the new Great Wolf Lodge in Manteca. This is the first water park to return to the region since the
Manteca Waterslides closed in 2004. The Great Wolf
Lodge has unique construction features including a
510,000 SF hotel, 100,000 SF indoor water park, an
extensive water slide complex, a family entertainment
center, restaurant, food court, meeting rooms and
banquet rooms. BPR’s staff provided project
management for the project on behalf of the City of
Manteca’s Building Department. This complex project
required flexibility and a solid working relationship with the designer team and contactors. Occupancy Types include R-1, A-2, A-3, B, M, F-1, S-1, S-2, with Type I-B Construction. Construction of the Great Wolf Lodge was completed in 2020.

Page 18 ends

104
BPR
Hollywood Park Aquatic Centerꞁ CLARK COUNTY, NV
BPR Consulting Group’s staff provide a constructability/plan review of the Hollywood Park Aquatic Center Project which consisted of a very in-depth review of all building disciplines on behalf of the project owner, the County of Clark. The drawings, specifications and calculations were thoroughly reviewed for consistency, coordination with other disciplines and code compliance. The Hollywood Park Aquatic Center project consists of a 13,596 SF indoor pool structure and 16,246 SF of support facilities, which includes locker rooms, mechanical rooms, storage rooms, office space, lobby, reception area, concessions and other associated facilities. Also included in the project is an outdoor pool and water park facility that consists of water slide structures. The new building structure is a one-story structure with a Group A4 occupancy classification and Type II B construction. The indoor pool structure is constructed of structural steel framing with long-span steel roof trusses supported by wide-flange perimeter beams and steel columns. The lateral force resisting system for the indoor pool structure consists of conventional braced frames. The support facility is constructed of concrete masonry units, (CMU), bearing walls supporting steel open-webbed roof joists and wide flange beams where required. The lateral force resisting system for the support facility is CMU shear walls. The roof system for all buildings consists of corrugated steel roofing covered with built-up roofing. The foundation system for the project consists of conventional continuous and isolated pad footings supporting the steel columns and CMU bearing walls. The estimated construction cost for this project was approximately $14,000,000.00.

Yogi Bear’s Jellystone Water Park ꞁ COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, CA BPR’s staff provided complete plan review services for Yogi Bear Jellystone Water Park, a newly constructed water park in San Joaquin County consisting of a lazy river, play pool, multi-level play structure and supporting facilities. The project consists of Type VB construction and Occupancy
Groups A-5 and S-1.

The lazy river consists of a reinforced concrete/gunite structure having a depth of approximately 3.5 feet, a length of 450 lineal feet and is supported on a helical pier
foundation system. The play pool is a 6,253 SF reinforced concrete/gunite play pool with an average depth of 6 inches and supported on a helical pier foundation system. The play structure consists of new multi-level play structures with water slides. Supporting structures include a new modular restroom building, a new modular shower building, a new 1,200 SF pump house consisting of a concrete block building with wood framed roof structure supported on a helical pier foundation system and an elevated 220 SF steel and wood framed electrical equipment room with stair structure as well as miscellaneous water park components including an ADA lift, permanently installed play features, sumps, plumbing and electrical equipment, site lighting, fencing, ramps and accessibility surface features.

Page 19 ends

105
BPR
Four Seasons Resort & Residences ꞁ CALISTOGA, CA
BPR Consulting Group’s staff provided plan review
services for the Four Seasons Resort & Residences
project which consists of a 1 story 57,595 SF Lodge with Type 1-A construction at the podium, with Type III-B
Construction above the podium level. The lodge
consists of a reinforced concrete podium structure with one- and two-story steel framed structures above the
podium. The hotel portion of the project consists of
twelve two-story and four one-story villas which
provides approximately 80,761 SF of hotel
accommodations spread out over 16 separate Villas.

Included in the resort project are two outdoor pools with large pool decks with two one-story pool buildings which house restrooms/showers and an outdoor bar & grill with a total square footage of 3,071 SF, both with Type V-B Construction. At the south end of the property 20 one and two-story single-family residences were constructed with square footages ranging from 2605 to 5807 SF with 440 SF detached garages. The projects are Type VB construction with R-3 and U occupancies. Also included in the project is several miscellaneous service and equipment buildings.

The Four Seasons Resort and Residences project consists of multiple buildings spread throughout the site in a campus type atmosphere. The lower level of the Lodge Building contains an underground parking garage, back of house spaces including mechanical and electrical rooms, an employee locker room and restrooms. Also included in the lower level of the Lodge is a winery, commercial kitchen, wine storage area, private dining areas and support spaces. Due to the topography of the site the lower level spaces have access at grade include a loading area, an outdoor mechanical yard, compactor room, event spaces, meeting rooms, a wine tasting room and a general store. Located on top of the podium structure is the arrival / drop-off auto court with a landscape plaza and entries / walkways to the various buildings located on top of the podium structure. The buildings located on the podium structure include the Hotel Lobby/Check-in Building, a two-story spa building, a fitness building with back of house offices and a restaurant building with an outdoor dining plaza.

InShape Health Club ꞁ NAPA, CA
BPR Consulting Group’s staff
provided complete plan review
services for this newly
constructed 34,569 SF health
club. This state-of-the-art
health club facility is
comprised of a new two level
fully sprinklered building of
Type lll-B construction with A3 Occupancy. The facility contains both indoor and outdoor lap pools, a exercise equipment area, open workout studios, restroom and locker rooms. Plans were reviewed to verify compliance with the California Building Standards Code.

Page 20 ends

106
BPR
References
BPR’s Principals have worked very hard for over 20 years providing top quality, timely, and efficient building safety services developing reputations of providing services in a professional, courteous manner, always in our Client’s best interests by honoring our commitment to provide timely superior services. We believe our best advertisement is references from current and previous clients and we encourage you to contact our client references. Following are three clients references from agencies of similar population size to the City of South Lake Tahoe:

Brad Wungluck, Chief Building Official
City of Manteca, Community Development Dept., Building Safety 1215 W. Center Street, Suite 201
Manteca, CA 95337
Ph: (209) 456-8562
Email: [email protected]
Mr. Jim Mangino, Building Official
City of Roseville, Development Services Dept., Building Division 311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Ph: (916) 774-5332
Email: [email protected]
Scott Zangrando, PE, Building Official
City of Folsom, Community Development Dept., Building Services 50 Natoma Street
Folsom, CA 95630
Ph: (916) 461-6220
Email: [email protected]

Page 21 ends

107
BPR

APPENDIX A

PROPOSED STAFF RESUMES
Please see the following pages for resumes of the proposed staff:

Page 22 ends

108
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Sacramento

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-4198
 CA Civil Engineer CE-50673
 NV Structural Engineer SE-18427
 NV Civil Engineer CE-18427

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 Structural Engineers Association,
Northern California (SEAONC)

BILL RODGERS, SE
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE | PROJECT MANAGER
Bill has more than 30 years of experience in the field of structural engineering, including more than 20 years of experience as a plan review engineer. His wealth of experience includes a varied and vast list of projects throughout California and Nevada. Bill is in demand for handson work within jurisdictions due to his great success in blending excellent engineering skills with responsive customer service.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal Structural Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Bill directs client plan review on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Senior Structural Engineer | Plans Examiner | Interwest Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Bill performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California and Nevada. In addition to providing structural plan review services, he was responsible for the production and performance of Interwest offices, including maintaining client relationships. Bill’s duties also included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial, and residential projects.

Senior Structural Engineer | LP2A / Bureau Veritas | 2001 - 2006 Bill performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California and Nevada Structural Engineer| Associate | DES Architects + Engineers | 1995 – 2001 Bill was responsible for the structural design of many projects throughout the Bay Area, including Pacific Shores Center in Redwood City, Moffett Corners in Sunnyvale, Carlmont High School in Belmont, and many other projects. Additionally, Bill oversaw the structural department of this architecture and engineering firm, and was responsible for staff development and work quality.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Judicial Council of California | State of California | 2010 – 2021
Bill provided project management and structural plan review services for new court buildings and court building upgrades throughout California. Most recently he provided services for upgrades to the Sonora courthouse, the new courthouse in Modesto and the new eighteen-story high-rise Sacramento Criminal Courthouse.
109
Bill Rodgers, SE – Principal / Project Manager
BPR
Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Division of State Architect | State of California | 2016 – 2021
Bill provided project management and structural plan review services for new school buildings and school upgrades throughout California. Recent projects include Westmore Oaks Elementary School, Santa Maria High School and El Camino College District, New Behavioral Health and Social Science Building.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | University of California, Merced | 2020 Campus Expansion | 2017 – 2021
Bill ensured all plan reviews were completed within the agreed upon timeframes by leading weekly conference calls with the plan review and onsite team and regularly visiting the project site. Additionally, Bill provided structural plan review services for this expansive project.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | City of Berkeley | Berkeley, CA | 2008 – 2021 Bill ensured all plan review services for the City of Berkeley were accurate and completed in a timely manner.

Project Manager/Structural Engineer | Downtown Commons Tower | Sacramento, CA | 2016 – 2019
Bill served as the project manager for the plan review of this new 634,357 gross SF, 16-story, mixed-use tower located adjacent to the new Sacramento Kings Arena. The tower included office space for the team and area management, a 250-room hotel, 44-residential units and below grade parking. 110
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, University of
Wyoming

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-3846
 CA Civil Engineer CE-46096
 ID Structural Engineer SE-8225
 ID Civil Engineer CE-8225
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 Structural Engineers Association of
Northern California (SEAONC)

ROGER PETERSON, SE
PRINCIPAL | PLAN REVIEW MANAGER
With more than 34 years of experience in structural design and plan review, Roger brings considerable depth and knowledge to any project. Roger is a California Registered Structural and Civil Engineer who has designed and provided plan review services for multi-story steel and concrete-framed buildings, as well as one-story structures utilizing steel, concrete, timber, and masonry framing systems. His design experience includes schools, commercial and industrial projects, micro-chip production facilities, power plant installations and multi-family residential projects. Roger's expertise contributes to the success and safety of all projects.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal | Structural Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Roger directs client plan review on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Senior Structural Engineer | Project Manager | Interwest Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Roger provided management for several of Interwest’s offices and special projects as well as performed structural plan review for commercial and residential construction for municipalities for various state and local agencies throughout California. In addition to providing structural plan review services, Roger was responsible for the production and performance of Interwest offices, including maintaining client relationships. His duties also included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial, and residential projects.

Senior Structural Engineer | Plans Examiner | Branch Manager LP2A | Bureau Veritas | CA | 1999 - 2006
Roger served as branch manager and lead structural plan reviewer for the Sacramento Area branch office. He was responsible for the production and performance of office including maintaining client relationships. His duties included performing structural plan reviews for industrial, commercial and residential projects.

Project Engineer | Power Engineers, Inc. | 1999
Roger was a project design engineer for commercial and industrial-type projects. He provided structural design and construction administration services.

Project Engineer | Office Manager | R2H Engineering, Inc. | 1998 - 1999 Roger was the office manager and project design engineer responsible for the structural design of commercial projects.

Project Engineer | Rutherford & Chekene | 1995 - 1998
Roger was responsible for providing design and detailing for commercial and industrial type projects, including numerous projects in the micro-chip industry.
111
Roger Peterson, SE – Principal / Plan Review Manager
BPR
Design Engineer | Project Engineer | DES Engineers & Architects | 1997 - 1995 Roger provided engineering design and detailing for commercial, institutional, corporate and residential building projects using wood, steel, concrete and masonry building materials.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Hollywood Park | Inglewood, CA | 2018 – 2021 Roger provided plan review services for this new, mixed-use development which included retail and office space with associated parking encompassing 28.5 acres.

Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Nasa Ames Research Center | Moffett Field, CA | 2018 Roger provided structural plan review and project management of this 1.2 million square-foot development comprised of office, research, and development space.

Project Manager | Structural Engineer | Monterey Park Hotel & Residence | Monterey Park, CA | 2017 – 2021
Roger provided plan review services and project management for this new, mixed-use hotel, condominium, and restaurant podium type building.

Project Manager |Structural Engineer | Hatchet Ridge Wind Farm | Shasta County, CA | 2009 - 2010
Roger provided project management, structural plan review and field inspections for this 101.2 MW power generating facility that consists of 44 – 2.3 MW wind turbines constructed along 9 miles of the ridge line on Hatchet Ridge near Burney, CA.
112
BPR

EDUCATION
 Graduate Coursework in Structural &
Geotechnical Engineering, California
State University, Sacramento
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico
 AA, Physical Science, Butte College,
Oroville, CA

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE &

CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Structural Engineer SE-3632
 CA Civil Engineer CE-39404
 NV Structural Engineer
SE-019992
 NV Civil Engineer CE-019992
 National Earthquake Hazard
Reduction Program Training
 CA Construction Law Training
International Code Council - 801789
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Building Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 San Joaquin ICC Chapter of Building
Officials – Past President
 Napa Solano ICC Chapter – Past
President
 Sacramento Valley Association of
Building Officials – Multiple Term
Board of Directors Member
 CALBO Building and Fire Advisory
Committee – Appointed Member
 CALBO Structural Committee –
Appointed Member

RON BEEHLER, SE, CBO
PRINCIPAL | SENIOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEER
Ron utilizes experience gained through more than 35 years of hands-on experience performing life safety, accessibility, and structural plan reviews to successfully manage building departments, building department services and high-profile building projects on behalf of public agencies throughout California. His experience includes establishing and coordinating on-site building department services for large, multi-building projects and unique, fast-paced development projects. Ron has served as Chief Building Official for multiple California public agencies including interim assignments. He has also provided building department assessments on behalf of municipal clients to identify inefficiencies and implement best practice improvements.

Licensed as a Civil and Structural Engineer in California and Nevada, certified by the International Code Council as a Building Official, Code Specialist, Plans Examiner and Building Inspector, Ron is uniquely qualified to evaluate and manage all building department services. His background includes the position of Chief Building Official with the City of Sacramento directing a staff of 120 engineers, plan reviewers and building inspectors, Chief of Engineering Design and Construction for the California National Guard and Senior Structural Engineer with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD).

Ron is dedicated to maintaining his knowledge of California building codes, laws and regulations related to building department operations. He frequently lectures and presents classes on technical topics on behalf of professional organizations including CALBO and multiple International Code Council Chapters throughout California and other western states.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Principal | Director of Operations | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present
Ron manages client plan review and inspection services on behalf of BPR Consulting Group providing efficient services on behalf of multiple municipal clients.

Director, Building Safety Services | Interwest Consulting Group | 2006 – 2021
Ron provided direct oversight of all Building Safety Services including coordination of all plan review and building inspection services, ensuring timely and responsive services. He worked with building officials for fullservice clients to insure timely and efficient services. Ron also managed and provided direct oversight of plan review and inspection services for large, complicated and fast-paced projects on behalf of public agency clients.

Chief Building Official | City of Sacramento | 2003 – 2006 Ron planned, directed, and managed activities for a 120-person building department with oversight responsibilities for construction inspections and plan review of 18,000 permitted projects annually. He planned, organized, 113
Ron Beehler, SE, CBO – Principal / Director of Operations BPR
administered, and evaluated staff work. Other duties included report writing and presentations to community groups, city council and professional organizations, and planning and administering a budget of $13.6 million.

Supervising Engineer | Building Inspection Division | City of Sacramento | 2002 – 2003 Ron supervised plan review, managed plan intake and public counter functions for two regional permit centers, trained and mentored staff, met with architects and engineers to resolve building code related issues, coordinated plan review for high profile projects, and worked with field inspection supervisors and inspectors.

Regional Compliance Officer, Senior Structural Engineer | CA State Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development | 1998 – 2002
Ron supervised regional hospital inspection program coordinating field inspection staff and approval of special inspection issues. He resolved complicated code related inspection issues, and reviewed plans, specifications, and structural calculations for healthcare facilities. Ron consulted with architects and engineers to resolve complex code interpretation issues. He researched and investigated structural adequacy of building materials and manufactured products, and verified proper loads, forces, and materials for the design of buildings and equipment anchorage.

Chief of Facilities Engineering | California National Guard | 1991 – 1998 Ron supervised and planned work for engineering design and project inspection staff, developed scope and budgets for projects, directed preparation of plans from preliminary design through working drawings, coordinated and approved project specifications and cost estimates, negotiated and approved project changes, coordinated inspection activities, resolved inspection disputes, represented National Guard/Military Department at public meetings, conducted plan review for projects designed by consultants, and presented design concepts and final designs.

Associate Structural Engineer | CA State Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development | 1987 – 1991
Ron reviewed construction plans and specifications for new hospitals and skilled nursing facilities for California Building Code and UBC requirements, met with architects and engineers to resolve plan review issues, reviewed field changes, investigated, and resolved construction conflicts and other administrative duties.

Associate Engineer Architect | Sacramento County Building Department | 1983 – 1987 Ron reviewed construction plans and specifications, and structural calculations for building code compliance, reviewed plans for residential, multi-residential, commercial, and industrial structures, and met with designers to resolve code issues related to commercial and residential structures. 114
BPR

EDUCATION
 BSME, California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo
 Credentialed Instructor, Los Rios
Community College District
Campuses: Cosumnes River College,
Folsom Lake College, & Sacramento
City College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Registered Mechanical Engineer,
31455
 CA Registered Fire Protection
Engineer, 2013
 Certificate Fire Protection
Engineering | University of California
Davis Extension
 Certificate in HVAC and Refrigeration
| University of California Davis
Extension
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 American Society of Heating,
Refrigerating & Air Conditioning
Engineers
 American Society of Mechanical
Engineers
 National Fire Protection Association
 American Society of Plumbing
Engineers

DAVID CASTILLO, ME, FPE

MECHANICAL ENGINEER / FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER
David brings more than 30 years of breadth, depth, and knowledge of mechanical engineering, design, and plan review to any project. A California licensed professional Mechanical Engineer and Fire Protection Engineer, his expertise encompasses HVAC, Plumbing, Medical Gases, and Fire Sprinklers.

David’s background includes mechanical engineering, design, and plan review on Central Treatment Centers, Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities, Inpatient Mental Health Clinics, and Inmate Housing Units for the Department of Corrections. He has engineered and designed Acute Care Hospitals, Skilled Nursing Facilities, Surgery Clinics, Psychiatric Hospitals, Pharmaceutical Plants, Industrial Plants, Educational Facilities, and Hi-Rise Commercial Buildings.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Plan Review Engineer | BPR Consulting Group |
2021 – Present
David performs mechanical engineering and fire protection engineering plan review services for BRP’s California clients.

Senior Plan Review Engineer | Interwest Consulting Group | 2012 - 2021
David performed mechanical engineering and fire protection engineering plan review services for Interwest’s California clients.

Senior Mechanical Engineer | State of California, OSHPD Group | 2001 - 2012
David performed plan checking of mechanical systems for hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, and surgery centers to ensure code compliance with the CBC, CMC, CPC and NFPA.

Vice President | Technical Engineering Group, Inc. | 2000 - 2001 David responsibilities included acquiring new clients, maintaining existing clients and preparing proposals. He performed heating and cooling load calculations, laid out mechanical designs for central plant systems, chilled water systems, heating hot water systems and variable air volume systems for hospitals, prisons, and educational facilities. David performed in-house plan check of all projects, and served as the Engineer of Record for all projects. He is knowledgeable of CMC, CPC, CBC, NFPA and OSHPD.

Project Manager / Lead Mechanical Engineer | Mazzetti & Associates | 1999 - 2000 David provided project management for all aspects of mechanical design on prisons, hospitals, pharmaceutical facilities, and office buildings. He was familiar with cGMP and all classes of clean rooms related to manufacturing facilities.
115
Dave Castillo, ME, FPE – Mechanical Engineer / Fire Protection Engineer BPR
Project Manager / Lead Mechanical Engineer | Interface Engineering, Inc. / 1997 - 1999 David was the lead engineer for the Mechanical Division of a Mechanical/Electrical engineering firm. He initiated and implemented the writing of a Project Management Procedures Manual for companywide use. David performed heating and cooling load calculations, layout of mechanical designs for central plant systems, chilled water systems, heating hot water systems, variable air volume systems, and write specifications.

Mechanical Designer | Edward Rios & Associates | 1994 - 1997 David was responsible for all aspects of HVAC, process piping and plumbing design and drafting for a mechanical engineering firm. He performed heating and cooling load calculations using Trane Trace analysis software.

Mechanical Designer | The Spink Corporation | 1991 - 1994 David was responsible for all plumbing and process piping design and drafting for the Mechanical Division of a 115-person multidisciplinary engineering firm. Drafting was done using AutoCAD Release 11. David’s primary responsibilities included running HVAC loads using Trane “Load 600” analysis program, Title 24 compliance, and field work for remodel/rehabilitation projects.

Mechanical Designer / Estimator | Mark III Engineering Contractors | 1986 - 1991 David performed material takeoffs for plumbing and HVAC. He designed HVAC and plumbing for commercial projects. David priced out projects and submitted bids to general contractor. He also served as a project manager for field staff.
116
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Electrical Engineering, California
Polytechnic University

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Electrical Engineer 12290
 HI Electrical Engineer 13259
 International Association of
Electrical Inspectors – Electrical
Plans Examiner and Electrical
Inspector – 6027880
International Code Council (ICC)
 ICC CA Commercial Building
Inspector
 ICC CA Commercial Mechanical
Inspector
 ICC CA Commercial Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC CA Residential Mechanical
Inspector
 ICC CA Residential Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
 International Association of
Plumbing and Mechanical Officials
 International Association of
Electrical Inspectors
 IEEE

JEROME SCHREIBER, EE

ELECTRICAL ENGINEER
Jerome has more than 40 years of electrical industry experience. He is a licensed electrical engineer in California and Hawaii, and is certified by the International Association of Electrical Inspectors as an Electrical Plans Examiner and Electrical inspector. Jerome’s experience is wide and varied, having provided engineering services to the military, public utilities, private organizations and municipal agencies.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Inspector | City of Glendale | 2013 -Present
Jerome has served as a Building Inspector for the City of Glendale since August 2013. His duties have included Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, & Electrical Inspections and Plans Examination.

Instructor | Long Beach City College | 2013 -Present
Since 2013, Jerome has served as an instructor in National Electrical Code for Industrial & Commercial Applications at Long Beach City College.

Senior Electrical Inspector | City of Vernon | 1987 -2013 Jerome was responsible for electrical plans examination and performing Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, & Electrical inspections and all electrical installation in the City and for the City municipal facilities.

Electrical Consultant | BSK Engineering | 1986 -1987
Jerome served as an Electrical Consultant for a private firm that provided design for factories, restaurants, computer rooms, car lots, and other such installations.

Distribution Engineer | Southern California Edison | 1983 -1986 Jerome provided service planning and customer coordination for this Southern California utility.

Interior Electrician | Air National Guard | 1978 -1980
Jerome provided electrician services for various installations as a member of the Air National Guard.

Automatic Flight Control Systems Specialist, Sergeant | US Air Force | 1973 -1977
As a Sergeant in the US Air Force, Jerome served as Shift Supervisor and was responsible for repair crew to facilitate maintenance on transient aircraft.
117
BPR

EDUCATION
 Victor Valley College Inspection
Technology Certificate
 Pacesetter Schools Building
Inspections Certificate
 Gordon Copper Vocational
Technical School

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
ICC NO. 848507:
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Combination Inspector
 ICC Combination Inspector - Legacy
 ICC Electrical Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Mechanical Inspector UMC
 ICC Plumbing Inspector
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC Master Electrician (NV)
000-001221
 OSHA 10 & 30 Training
 ATC 20 Post Disaster Training

RICHARD MADDOX, ICC

ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
Richard brings over 25 years of experience in all aspects of plan review and building inspections. Richard provides accurate and complete electrical plan reviews of residential and commercial buildings. While working for Clark County, Richard represented his department for multiple years at all electrical industry events such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW. Richard maintains his electrical plan review and inspection skills by regularly participating in industry and code related training and attending electrical safety and electrical industry symposiums

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Electrical Plan Review  BPR Consulting Group  2021 –
Present
Richard provides electrical plan reviews for residential and commercial projects for compliance with the California Electrical Code,California Energy Code requirements as well as local codes and ordinances.

Building Inspector and Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2013-2021
Provided electrical plan review and inspections for residential and commercial buildings for compliance with California Electrical Code and Energy Code requirements, local codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Supervising Building Inspector, Electrical Specialist | Clark County, Nevada | 2003-2012
Supervised a staff of 15 inspectors. Assisted customers in addressing problems and concerns with compliance issues on code-related matters.

Assisted with plan checking for complex projects and conflict resolution.

Participated in budget planning, budget review and long-range planning.

Building Inspection Specialist | Clark County, Nevada | 2000-2003 Developed an education program for inspectors. Researched, authored and maintained the department’s electrical policies, procedures and inspection technical guidelines. Represented the department to the local utility on all electrical related issues. Represented the department at all electrical industry meetings such as IAEI, IEEE, AGC, NEMA, ABC, SNHBA and IBEW.

Senior Building Inspector | Clark County, Nevada | 1997-2000 Combination inspection of single family and commercial occupancies for code compliance. Maintained an inspection record in the field and office. Investigated complaints and issuance of enforcement actions. Assisted all customers in addressing problems and concerns on compliance issues on all code-related matters related to active permits.

Combination Inspector | Clark County, Nevada | 1995-1997 Combination inspection of single family and commercial occupancies for code compliance. Maintained an inspection record in the field and office. Investigated complaints and issuance of enforcement actions. 118
BPR

EDUCATION
 Associates in Building Inspection
Technology, Butte Community
College
 Associates in Mathematics, Butte
Community College

CERTIFICATIONS
 Certified Access Specialist – CASp710
International Code Council, 8250398
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Permit Technician
 ICC Commercial Building Inspector
 ICC Residential Plans Examiner
 ICC Residential Combination
Inspector
ANDREW BURKE, CASp, ICC
CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST | PLANS EXAMINER
Andrew is a Certified Access Specialist and ICC certified Plans Examiner with more than 17 years of industry experience in plan review, inspection, administration and estimating. Andrew has extensive plan check experience in multi-story mixed use projects and provides in-depth review of accessibility issues to ensure compliance with all California building codes.

His CASp certification provides him the ability to ensure all aspects of accessibility have been achieved. His formal training in ICC codes, as well as on-the-job experience, helps him to provide thorough and accurate commercial and residential plan reviews and inspections. Andrew is an excellent asset to any building department both in the office and out in the field.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Plans Examiner | Certified Access Specialist (CASp) | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present
Provides life safety and accessibility plan review for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Plans Examiner | Certified Access Specialist (CASp) | Interwest Consulting Group|2013 – 2021
Provided life safety and accessibility plan reviews for residential and commercial projects including residential master plans, custom residential projects, commercial tenant improvement and remodel projects.

Building Department Intern | Town of Los Gatos | 2012
Andrew worked as an intern in various areas of a building department. Performed field inspections and worked behind the counter as a permit technician.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion | University of California, Merced | 2016 - 2021 Life Safety and Accessibility Plans Examiner | Andrew reviewed plans for the campus expansion for compliance California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy Standards, Fire Codes, Green Building Standards Code, and California Accessibility Standards; state and local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Sac Republic Soccer Stadium | City of Sacramento | 2019 Accessibility Plans Examiner| Andrew provided plan review for this new 409,664 SF stadium to ensure compliance with applicable accessibility codes and standards.

North 40 | Town of Las Gatos | 2018 - 2019
Accessibility Plans Examiner| Andrew provided accessibility reviews for the new 211,773 SF mixed use building in the North 40 development consisting of residential, parking garage, community room and commercial. 119
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Business and General
Management, San Francisco State
University
 AA, Business Administration, College
of San Mateo
 Coursework, Electrical Engineering
California Polytechnic State
University, San Luis Obispo

CERTIFICATIONS
International Code Council 8005399
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC Building Inspector
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector

MARK MEYERS, CBO, ICC

PLANS EXAMINER
For 25 years, Mark served as a Building Official, Deputy Building Official, Building Inspector, Plans Examiner and Permit Coordinator for the City and County of Madera and the City of Clovis. He has implemented permit tracking software for multiple jurisdictions, prepared operating budgets and managed all facets of building department activities. He currently serves as an Inspection Manager, supervising inspection and clerical staff, for the UC Merced 2020 Project, helping to design and implement the inspection program to fit the University’s evolving needs.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building OfficialProject Manager  BPR Consulting Group  2021 – Present
Mark provides Building Official services for several Cities and Counties throughout California. In addition, Mark provides supervision for inspection staff and clerical staff for the Cities and Counties where he works. Marks responsibilities also includes meeting with clients to insure that expectations are being met and maintaining client relationships.

Inspection Manager  Consultant  2016 – 2021
Mark supervised inspection staff and clerical staff for the UC Merced 2020 Project, working with client staff for the design and implementation of the inspection program to fit the changing needs of UC Merced.

Building Official City of Clovis2008 – 2015
Mark supervised 9 staff and was responsible for all building inspections. His duties included supervision and training of office staff and implementing new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented a new computerized permit tracking and issuance program for the Planning and Development Services Department.

This system included complete integration with the City’s well-developed GIS systems. All permit processing was done manually before new permit tracking system was implemented. The program interfaces with the Tax Collector and Assessor’s Office. Mark formulated a million-dollar budget and presented it annually. He worked regularly with the Fire, Planning, and Engineering Departments.

Deputy Building Official City of Clovis  2006 – 2008
Mark supervised 14 staff responsible for building inspection processes and building permit fee revision. He trained office staff and implemented new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented new computerized permit fees to better comply with state laws and to track time for each inspection type.

Permit Coordinator County of Madera  2000 – 2006
Mark was responsible for all building inspection processes and coordinating building permit issuance. He performed all the duties of a Building Official, and supervised and trained a staff of 20 employees, as well as implementing new training programs for building inspectors. Mark designed and implemented a new computerized permit tracking and issuance program for the Resource Management Agency. Mark coordinated and supervised the remodel of a 37,000 square foot retail building into an office complex for the Resource Management Agency and moved four 120
Mark Meyers, CBO, ICC – Plans Examiner
BPR
departments into one building. Mark’s duties allowed him to work regularly with the Environmental Health, Fire, Planning, Engineering and General Services, Public Works, Roads and Transportation Departments.

Building Inspector  Plans Examiner  Acting Chief Building Official  City of Madera | 1991 – 2000
As a building inspector, Mark inspected residential and commercial buildings, and was responsible for enforcing all building codes per State and local codes. As a plans examiner, Mark regularly worked with the planning department. He formulated the budget for the Building Department and regularly presented staff reports to the City Council. He also did preliminary work on designing a computerized tracking program for the issuance of permits for the Building Department. Mark was eventually designated Acting Chief Building Official.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion  University of California, Merced  2016 - Present Inspection Manager | Mark supervised inspection staff and clerical staff for the UC Merced 2020 Project, working with client staff for the design and implementation of the inspection program to fit the changing needs of UC Merced.

Table Mountain RancheriaFriant, CA  2018 – Present
Building Official | Mark served as the Building Official for the Table Mountain Casino and Hotel Expansion providing guidance to the Tribe for code alternatives and manages the inspection and plan review team for the project. 121
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Public Administration, Minor in
English, California Baptist University
 AA, Construction Technology,
Riverside Community College
 AA, Physical Education, Riverside
City College

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
ICC NO. 859362:
 Master Code Professional
 Electrical Inspector
 Certified Fire Code Official
 Certified Building Official
 Plumbing Inspector UPC
 Mechanical Inspector UMC
 Fire Plans Examiner
 Building Code Official
 Combination Inspector – Legacy
 Fire Inspector I
 Fire Inspector II
 Building Inspector
 Residential Combination Inspector
 Building Plans Examiner
 Combination Dwelling Inspector –
Uniform Codes
 Building Code Specialist
 Fire Code Specialist
 Residential Energy Inspector/Plans
Examiner
 Accessibility Inspector/Plans
Examiner

MARK BERG, CBO, ICC
CERTIFIED BUILDING OFFICIAL | PLANS EXAMINER | BUILDING INSPECTOR | MASTER CODE PROFESSIONAL
Mark is an ICC Certified Building Official, Plans Examiner, Building Inspector, and Master Code Professional with experience performing life-safety, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and structural reviews in residential, multi-family and commercial projects. Mark has successfully guided department staff with inspection and plan review of all phases of complex construction projects. He is experienced utilizing building department permit tracking software and managing all common building department responsibilities, including plan review, multi-discipline inspections, plan review and inspection scheduling, field supervision, regulatory compliance, code interpretation, and project acceptance. Mark also possesses exceptional skills in complaint resolution, problem solving, damage assessment and team building.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Building Official, Life Safety Plans Examiner | BPR
Consulting Group | 2021-Present
Performing comprehensive plan review and inspection services for client agencies. Reviews residential and non-residential plans for compliance with California Building, Life Safety, Fire, Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical Codes, Energy and Green Standards, local building codes, policies, amendments, and ordinances.

Building Official, Life Safety Plans Examiner | Consulting Firm | 2017-2021
Performed comprehensive plan review and inspection services for residential and commercial projects for client agencies. Projects included residential, multi-family residential, commercial, and industrial projects consisting of tenant improvements and new buildings.

Building Official | City of Redlands | 2015-2017
Supervised staff coordination with cities, agencies and the public on various Technical or legal aspects of programs. Performed the most complex and difficult plan checks for both building and fire life safety. Reviewed the new and existing codes and regulations and recommended revision to current ordinances, policies, and inspection methods to meet new requirements.

Building Inspection Supervisor | City of Rancho Cucamonga | 2010-2015 Supervised and trained building inspection staff, developed inspection related policies and guidelines for the department, conflict resolution and code interpretations.

Building Official | City of Norco | 2006-2011
Supervised staff coordination with cities, agencies and the public on various technical or legal aspects of programs.

Performed the most complex and difficult plan checks for both building and fire life safety. Reviewed the new and 122
MARK BERG, CBO, ICC – Building Official / Plans Examiner / Building Inspector / Master Code Professional
BPR
existing codes and regulations and recommended revision to current ordinances, policies, and inspection methods to meet new requirements. Investigated violations of building construction codes and determined necessity for issuance of legal complaints.

Building Division Manager | County of Riverside | 2001-2006 Handled difficult public relations problems, directs investigations of complaint or problems, and recommends resolutions. Assisted in arranging and conducting classroom and on-the-job training sessions for the technical personnel and counter staff. Supervised the plan examination process, inspections, documentation activities and the development process.

Plans Examiner-Sr. Building Inspector | City of Temecula | 1991-2001 Oversee the plan examination process, inspections, documentation activities and the development review process.

Provided code interpretations and developed technical documents. Performed the most complex building code compliance plan reviews.

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 CALBO – Damage Assessment Committee, State Building Codes Committee  CACEO – California Association of Code Enforcement Officers  CEC – California Energy Commission
 ICC – Administrative Committee
 NFPA –National Fire Prevention Association, Building Systems Committee  IAPMO – Code Interpretation Committees for UPC, UMC
 JAEI – Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections
 City of Riverside Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Commission 123
BPR

EDUCATION
 BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Long Beach
 MS, Public Administration,
California State University, Long
Beach

PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
& CERTIFICATIONS
 CA Civil Engineer CE-45710
 Registered Environmental Assessor
5640
 Certified Permitting Professional
D11308, SCAQMD

DANIEL GARCIA, PE, REA, CPP

SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER
Dan is a licensed civil engineer with approximately 38 years of public works engineering and project management experience. He has served in senior and executive management public works positions with the cities of Maywood, Costa Mesa, Norwalk, El Segundo, Solvang, Culver City and Novato. Daniel brings to each project experience and expertise in the areas of Capital Improvement Program management, Private Development, Grading, Parks and Land Use, Water Resources and Transportation Planning.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Senior Civil Engineer | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 - Present Dan provides design and review services for numerous Public Works Departments in the Southern California Region.

Senior Civil Engineer | Project Manager | Consultant | 2014 – 2021
Dan provided project management project management, design services and reviews for numerous Public Works Departments. Dan managed numerous capital improvements, provided numerous site/grading reviews, reviewed numerous wastewater improvement projects and managed numerous street improvement projects. He served as a Public Works Director, City Engineer,and Project Manager for numerous Cities.

City Engineer | City of Norwalk | 2011 - 2014
Notable projects while serving as City Engineer include completing the design and right of way phase of the $22 million Firestone Bridge project and implementing $6 million in I-5 mitigation projects. He coordinated efforts with such agencies as the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA), Caltrans, and Gateway Cities, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Southern California Edison and the County of Los Angeles.

Assistant City Engineer | City of El Segundo | 2007 - 2010 Completed the construction of the Douglas Street Gap Closure Project ($39 million) Implemented $1 million seismic retrofit of the City’s 3.1 MG Water Reservoir. Completed construction and audits for the Douglas Street Gap Closure

3.1 Million Gallon Water Reservoir Seismic Retrofit. Street Improvements, Waterline and Sewer Replacements (various locations). 118th Street Improvements – Included reconstruction of street and coordination with BNSF Railway and Metro for the replacement of deteriorated rail with concrete paneled rails.

Senior Civil Engineer | City of Culver City | 2005 - 2007 As manager of the Capital Improvement Program and Sewer Collection System, his role included the coordination of industrial waste, air quality management, assessment districts and recycled water. Coordinated the Amalgamated Sewer Agreement with the City of Los Angeles, this included making capital improvements to the telemetry system for meters detecting the flow in and out of Culver City. Managed the Sewer Assessment District – This included coordination with the Los Angeles County Assessor regarding changes in customer water billings and capital improvements. Analysis of the Braddock Sewer Pump Station Improvement which led to the overhaul of the Culver City Sewer Master Plan. Instrumental in Sewer Replacements & Street Improvements (various locations) Public Works Director / City Engineer | City of Solvang | 2004 Responsibilities included the implementation of the Capital Improvement Program and maintenance of streets, storm drains, private development, transit, sewer collection, sewer treatment, water distribution, wastewater 124
Dan Garcia, PE, REA, CPP –Senior Civil Engineer
BPR
treatment, building maintenance and solid waste. Coordinated city issues with regional agencies such as the Santa Barbara County Association of Governments (SBCAG), the Public Works Coordination Council, the Sanitation Agencies Management Association (SAMA) and the Central Coast Water Agency (CCWA).Obtained approval from the State of California for a $10.2 million Revolving Fund Grant for water treatment on Well Number 3 in the Santa Ynez River. Reviewed private development including grading, paving, storm drain and sewer. Implemented the development of a new Skate Park. Street Improvements, Water and Sewer Replacements (various locations).

Obtained two new buses for Solvang Transit. Wrote LOMR’s (Letters of Map Revisions) for FEMA affected parcels Principal Civil Engineer | City of Novato | 2001 - 2004 Dan was responsible for the management of both private and Capital Improvement Projects. He successfully obtained approvals through presentations to City Council, Planning Commission and Design Review Committee and also coordinated with the Planning, Building, and Parks and Recreation Departments within the City. Externally, he coordinated with Marin County, the Army Corps, the Coastal Conservancy, special Districts and the public. He was also responsible for FEMA Flood Districts and encroachment permits. Private Development Review – As the Principal Civil Engineer in charge of Private Development, Dan coordinated with Developers and their Engineers through the City’s Design Review, Planning and City Council processes in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act, implementing Conditions of Approval and other State and Federal requirements. This included advocating for the City’s interests in the design of these developments.

Development Review Engineer | City of Hayward | 2000 - 2001 Responsible for managing private projects, assessment and benefit districts, annexations, FEMA flood districts, building division engineering review and liaison for the Community Development Department with Public Works. As a required staff member of the Planning Commission, he advocated engineering issues there and at City Council meetings. Working in the Planning Division, he was the central liaison to Public Works. He also managed all engineering issues in the Planning and Building Divisions, including permit issuance. He was the City’s Coordinator with LAFCO and Alameda County. Reviewed all Private Development Subdivision Plans for compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City’s Conditions of Approval. As a seated member of the Planning Commission, hewas the City’s Engineering Advocate for Private Development. As the City’s representative to the Local Area Formation Commission (LAFCO) for Alameda County, he advocated for Out-Of-Area Service Agreements with the County for sewer service in the County to the Hayward sewer system. Organized and implemented Landscaping and Lighting Districts under Proposition 218 throughout the City.

Assist. Harbor District Engineer | City of Los Angeles | 1984 - 2000 Responsible for the management of the Harbor District Bureau of Engineering office that included directing capital improvement of the streets, storm drain and wastewater programs. Accomplishments included the implementation of a Geographical Information System, Successful development and completion of a $5 million Watts Sewer Replacement Program, and the implementation of $45 million in other capital improvement projects. Responsible for the CIP budget for that district. As Assistant Division Engineer for the Solids Technology and Resource Recovery Division at Hyperion Sewage Treatment Plant, he supervised 105 consultant employees in the implementation of $500 million in research and development of solids handling projects. From 1998 to 2000, he served as the City of Los Angeles On-Call Emergency Sewer Coordinator using the City’s on-call list to address the sewer emergencies in the City of LA and analyzed the hydraulic problems with the City’s major sewers. 125
BPR

CERTIFICATIONS
 IAPMO Certified Plumbing Inspector,
030666
 IAPMO Certified Mechanical
Inspector, 090146
 CA LEED Certified, LEED AP BD+C,
10436985
 Certified Access Specialist, CASp-439
International Code Council, 1061008
 ICC Building Code Official
 ICC CA Residential Building,
Plumbing, Mechanical,
Combination, Electrical Inspector
 ICC Certified Building Official
 ICC CA Commercial Building,
Plumbing, Electrical, Combination,
Mechanical Inspector
 ICC Building, Electrical,
Combination, Mechanical , Plumbing
Inspector
 ICC CA Combination Inspector
 ICC Mechanical UMC
 ICC Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Plumbing Inspector UPC
 ICC CA Building Plans Examiner
 ICC Combination Inspector – Legacy
 ICC Building Code Specialist
 ICC Commercial Combination
Inspector

PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
 International Code Council,

RICK WALTERS, CASp, LEED, CBO, ICC
CERTIFIED ACCESS SPECIALIST | PLANS EXAMINER
Rick has over 30 years of experience in the construction industry with over 30 of those years in the Building Inspection industry. Rick has experience as a building official and inspector. He has provided senior inspector services in disaster zones for floods and wildfires which required communication with the National Guard, elected officials and law enforcement. Additionally, Rick is experienced in inspection management, council meetings, planning meetings, city and county design review meetings, field inspections, permit tracking and issuance, record keeping, construction techniques, and office procedures.

Rick has provided inspection services for over 25 different City, County, State and Military installations. He inspected services of a Wildfire Disaster Zone involving over 100 structures and provided Flood Zone inspections for over 1,100 homes. He provided Chief Building Official services to the Cities of Dixon, Calistoga, Yountville, St. Helena, Gridley, Auburn and Woodland.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Chief Building Official | Certified Access Specialist | Senior Inspector / BPR Consulting Group / 2021 - Present
Rick provides Building Official, building inspection, plan review, CASp review and inspection services for several clients in Northern California.

Chief Building Official | Certified Access Specialist | Senior Inspector / Interwest Consulting Group / 2014 - 2021
Performed Building Official, building inspection and plan review services for various Northern California municipalities, as well as providing CASp plan review and inspection services.

Inspection Services / Bureau Veritas | Beale Air Force Base, CA / 2012 - 2014
Rick provides full inspection services for military housing at Beale Air Force Base. Inspections of single family homes and duplexes include foundation, framing, mechanical, plumbing, electrical, and final inspections. Daily and weekly reports are compiled listing any deficiencies or items needing repair/replacement.

Fill-In Building Inspection Services / Bureau Veritas, CA / 2011 - 2012
Rick has provided fill-in building inspection services during staff vacations, sick-time, and periods of high-workload for the Cities of West Sacramento and Napa. He has inspected residential and commercial structures for compliance with all applicable building codes and local ordinances.

Building Inspection Services Manager / City of Woodland, CA / 2008 - 2011 Rick oversaw the inspection program for the City of Woodland. He managed and directed the inspectors on staff as well as performed inspections for residential, commercial, and industrial facilities. 126
Rick Walters, CBO, CASp, LEED, ICC – Building Official / Certified Access Specialist / Senior Inspector
BPR
Senior Building Inspector / City of Woodland, CA / 2007 - 2008 As a Senior Building Inspector in the City of Woodland, Rick performed inspections and building plan code compliance reviews for residential, commercial, and industrial projects including hotels, industrial construction and multiple housing tracts. Other job duties included permit tracking and issuance as well as record keeping.

Interim Building Official / City of Woodland, CA / 2006 - 2007 Senior Building Inspector / City of Woodland, CA / 2004 - 2006 Senior Building Inspector / City of Auburn, CA / 2004
Interim Building Official / City of Auburn, CA / 2003 – 2004 Senior Building Inspector II / City of Auburn, CA / 1999 – 2004 Building Inspector II / County of Yuba, CA / 1990 – 1999 Building Inspector I / County of Yuba, CA / 1989 - 1990 127
BPR

EDUCATION
 Gavilan College, Certificate
 Evergreen Valley College, Certificate

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND

CERTIFICATIONS
 ICC Certified Permit Technician,
8821141

STACEY BARKER

PERMIT TECHNICIAN / ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
Stacy is an ICC Certified Permit Technician with six years of experience providing services to multiple Northern California municipal clients. In addition to her technical abilities, Stacy has excellent customer service skills that help her to work well with applicants and City staff. She is efficient in the use of the GreenVue’s Digital Permit Suite, Accela Automation, Community Core, as well as other municipal tracking systems.

PROFESSIONAL HISTORY
Permit Technician | BPR Consulting Group | 2021 – Present Primary responsibilities include providing permit technician services to Norther California municipal clients and customer assistance to the general public. Processes documents and reports and directs them to the appropriate department/person. Stacy facilitates a positive productive working environment and maintains clear communication within the office.

Inspection Analyst | UC Merced | 2016 – Present
Primary responsibilities included provided administrative support to our consulting staff and customer assistance to the general public. Processed documents and reports and directed them to the appropriate department/person.

Stacy has workedon the UC Merced 2020 Project assisting in all facets of permit technician services. Stacy facilitated a positive productive working environment and maintains clear communication within the office.

Permit Technician | City of Foster City | 2015
As a Permit Technician for consulting firms, Stacy received and reviewed building applications from customers; assessed scope of project and relevant permit requirements; educated customers regarding necessary permits and general code compliance of their proposed projects. She verified that projects obtained all necessary approvals; verified professional and contractor licensing; calculated and verified valuations and fees; accepted payments and issued permits as authorized. Stacy maintained records and prepared reports as required. She assisted in completing permit applications by explaining building permit requirements; assisted and advised customers in matters relating to building requirements and status of submitted projects. She tracked plan check applications from submission to approval; routed plan checks to appropriate departments and updated applicants on status of their applications. Stacy also calculated fees for permits; logged inspections request and prepared field files for daily inspections for building inspectors; assisted building inspectors in coordinating inspection requests; and performed clerical duties for the building department. She prepared monthly reports for the Assessor’s Office and Construction Monitor and prepared monthly billings.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
2020 Project Expansion  University of California, Merced  2016 - 2020 Inspection Analyst| Stacey provided administrative support to our consulting staff and customer assistance to the general public. Processed documents and reports and directed them to the appropriate department/person. 128

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of the 5th day of April 2022 by and between the City of South Lake Tahoe, a municipal corporation (“City”) and BPR Consulting Group (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. Consultant is specially trained, experienced and competent to perform the special services which will be required by this Agreement.

B. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement on the terms and conditions described herein.

C. City desires to retain Consultant to render professional services as set forth in this Agreement.

AGREEMENT

2. Term/Time of Performance. The services by Consultant are to commence upon the execution of the Agreement and continue for 1year. 129

3. Compensation. Compensation to be paid to Consultant shall be in accordance with the Schedule set forth in Exhibit B which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In no event shall Consultant’s compensation, including travel and out-of-pocket expenses, exceed $48,200 without additional written authorization from City. Payment by City under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of defects, even if such defects were known to City at the time of payment. Payment is contingent upon compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, as set forth herein. Consultant shall obtain prior written authorization from the City Project Manager for any costs in excess of budgeted amounts for each line item, task, or obligation under the Scope of Services.

Termination, revocation, or expiration of this Agreement shall not release either party from liability resulting from an event which occurred prior to such termination, revocation or expiration.

7. Ownership of Documents.

All plans, studies, documents and other writings, including working notes and internal documents, prepared by and for Consultant, its officers, employees 130
and agents and subcontractors in the course of implementing this Agreement, shall become the property of City upon payment to Consultant for such work, and City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further compensation to Consultant or to any other party.

8. Consultant’s Books and Records.
a. Consultant shall maintain any and all ledgers, books of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, and other records or documents evidencing or relating to charges for services, or expenditures and disbursements charged to City for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant for services provided pursuant to this Agreement.
b. Consultant shall maintain all documents and records which demonstrate performance under this Agreement for a minimum period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, and such records shall be available at Consultant’s address indicated from the date of termination or completion of this Agreement.
c. Any records or documents required to be maintained pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available for inspection or audit, at any time during regular business hours, upon written request by the City Manager, City Attorney, City Auditor or a designated representative of these officers. Copies of such documents shall be provided to City for inspection at City offices when it is practical to do so. d. Where City has reason to believe that such records or documents may be lost or discarded due to dissolution, disbandment or termination of Consultant’s business, City may, by written request by any of the above-named officers, require that custody of the records be given to City and that the records and documents be maintained at City offices. Access to such records and documents 131
shall be granted to any party authorized by Consultant, Consultant’s representatives, or Consultant’s successor-in-interest.

City is not required to make any deductions or withholdings form the compensation payable to Consultant under the provisions of this Contract and is not required to issue W-2 Forms for income and employment tax purposes for any of Consultant’s assigned personnel. Any third party persons employed by Consultant shall be entirely and exclusively under the direction, supervision, and control of Consultant. Consultant hereby indemnifies and holds City harmless from any and all claims that may be made against City based upon any contention by any third party that an employer-employee relationship exists by reason of this Contract.

10. Interest of Consultant. Consultant, (and principals, associates and professional employees of consultant) covenants and represents that it does not now have any investment or interest in real property and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the area covered by this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment which would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s services hereunder. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder no person having any such interest shall perform any services under this Agreement.

Consultant is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:
a. Will conduct research and arrive at conclusions with respect to his/her rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel independent of the control and direction of City or of any City official, other than normal agreement monitoring; and,
132
b. Possesses no authority with respect to any city decision beyond rendition of information, advice, recommendation or counsel. [FPPC Reg. 18700(a)(2)].

12. Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, regional and local laws, codes, ordinances and regulations in carrying out his/her duties under this Agreement. Consultant shall observe and comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations and codes of federal, state and local governments, and shall commit no trespass on any public or private property in performing any of the work authorized by this Agreement. The City, its officials, officers, elected officials, appointed officials and employees shall not be liable at law or in equity as a result of any failure of Consultant to comply with this section.

In the event it is determined that the Consultant is required to pay prevailing wages for the work performed under this Agreement, the Consultant shall pay all penalties and wages as required by law.

14. Indemnity. Consultant hereby agrees to and shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed boards, officers, agents, employees and volunteers from and against any liability for any and all claims, demands, actions, losses, damages and injuries, direct or indirect (including any and all 133
costs and expenses in connection therein), arising out of Consultant’s performance of this Agreement or caused in any way by Consultant’s negligence or its breach of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except for any such claims arising out of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City. Consultant agrees to defend City from and against any and all losses, damages, claims costs and fees arising out Consultant’s negligent acts, errors, omissions, regarding this Agreement, the Consultant’s work under this Agreement, or the consultant’s Scope of Work.

City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Consultant which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Consultant, of any of the insurance policies hereinafter set forth.

Consultant further waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the City for any liability, claims, demands, costs, charges and expenses and causes of action of whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of work under this Agreement, and consultant’s work under this Agreement.

15. Insurance Requirements.
a. Consultant, at Consultant’s own cost and expense, shall procure and maintain, for the duration of the contract, the following insurance policies.
i. Workers’ Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain Workers’ Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance for his/her employees in accordance with the laws of the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers’
Compensation Insurance and Employer’s Liability Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor’s employees. Any notice of cancellation of all Workers’ Compensation policies must be received by City 134
at least thirty (30) days prior to such change. Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice of nonrenewal of any Workers’ Compensation policies. The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents, employees and volunteers for losses arising from work
performed by Consultant for City.
ii. Commercial General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial general liability insurance no less broad than ISO form CG 00 01 in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Coverage must be made on
the standard Occurrence form. Claims-Made forms are not acceptable without prior written consent of City. City of South Lake Tahoe must be endorsed as an additional insured for liability arising out of ongoing operation by on behalf of Consultant. If a commercial general liability insurance form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general
aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required
occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain automobile liability insurance covering bodily injury and property damage for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with the work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for owned, hired and nonowned vehicles, in an amount of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for each occurrence. iv. Professional Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain professional errors and omissions liability insurance for protection against claims alleging negligent acts, errors or omissions which may arise from Consultant or by its employees, or subcontractors. The amount of this insurance shall not be less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) on a claims-made annual aggregate basis, or a combined single-limit per occurrence basis.
135
b. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance policy shall be with insurers possessing a AM Best’s rating of no less than A:VII and shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional
insured’s under Consultant’s General Liability and Automobile Liability policies with respect to liability arising out of this Agreement and/or work performed by or on behalf of the
Consultant, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work or operations.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance maintained by City, including any self-insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess insurance only and shall not contribute with it.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as though a separate policy had been written for each,
except with respect to the limits of liability of the insuring Consultant.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City except for Consultant’s Professional Liability and Employers’ Liability policies, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees or agents.
v. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers. vi. No policies of insurance carried by Consultant shall be suspended, voided, canceled, or changed in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days written notice to the City Attorney by Certified Mail.
c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. The Consultant shall be responsible for all deductibles in all of Consultant’s insurance policies. 136
The amount of deductibles for insurance coverage required herein shall be reasonable and approved by the City Attorney.
d. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance coverage required herein. Consultant shall not commence work under this contract until all insurance required under this section has been approved by City as to form, amount and carrier, nor shall Consultant allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until all similar insurance required and reasonably consistent limits of the subcontractor has been so obtained and approved. Certificates of insurance shall contain no exclusions unless negotiated with the City Attorney and approved, in writing, by the City Attorney.

16. Notices. Any notice required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and either served personally or sent prepaid, first class mail. Any such notice shall be addressed to the other party at the address set forth below.

Notice shall be deemed communicated within 48 hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this section.

If to City: City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Provide a copy to: City Attorney’s Office
City of South Lake Tahoe
1901 Lisa Maloff Way, Suite 300
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
If to Consultant: BPR Consulting Group ATTN: Bill Rodgers 2201 Francisco Drive, Suite 140-658
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
916-562-3600
[email protected]
Provide a copy to:

17. Assignment and Subcontracting. The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this Agreement is the professional reputation, experience, and competence of Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the Consultant under this Agreement will be 137
permitted only with the express consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be performed under this Agreement without the written authorization of City. If City consents to such subcontract, Consultant shall be fully responsible to City for all acts or omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in the Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as otherwise required by law.

18. Waiver. Waiver of a breach or default under this Agreement shall not constitute a continuing waiver of a subsequent breach of the same or any other provision under this Agreement.

20. Controlling Law Venue. This Agreement and all matters relating to it shall be governed by the laws of the State of California and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be held exclusively in the Superior Courts in the County of El Dorado, South Lake Tahoe Division.

22. Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, disability, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, 138
upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan, or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

23. Drug-Free Workplace Certification. By signing this Agreement, Consultant hereby certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the Consultant will comply with the requirements of the DrugFree Workplace Act of 1990 (Government Code Section 8350, et seq.) and will provide a drug-free work place by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355 (a). b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The person’s or organization’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance program; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide, as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who performs grant activities under this Agreement:
i. Will receive a copy of the Consultant’s drug-free policy statement; and
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the Consultant’s statement as a condition of employment on this Agreement.

24. Anti-Lobbying Certification. Consultant shall submit to City the Anti-Lobbying Certification contained in Exhibit C. Further, Consultant shall require that the 139
language of the certification in Exhibit C be included in all contracts or subcontracts entered into in connection with this Agreement and that all Consultants and contractors shall certify and disclose accordingly.

27. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City Attorney.

28. Severability. If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

31. Time is of the Essence. Time is of the essence for this Agreement.

32. Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement.

Each party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and to bind each respective party.
140
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the date first written above.

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE: CONSULTANT:

By___________________________ By ________________________________ Devin Middlebrook, Mayor Bill Rodgers, Principal-in-Charge Date __________________________ Date _____________________________ Business License # ___________________
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By____________________________ Date ________________________________ City Attorney
ATTEST:

By______________________________ Date ________________________________ City Clerk
Attachments:

Exhibit A – Scope of Services
Exhibit B – Compensation Schedule
Exhibit C - Anti-Lobbying Certification
141

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES AND TIMELINE

TASK SCHEDULE

COST PROPOSAL

RECREATION & SWIM COMPLEX PRELIMINARY DESIGN CONCEPTS

TASK SCHEDULE
Item No. Item Description Unit Qty. Unit
Price
Amount
1 Initial Plan Review and Comments LS 1 $21,800.00
2 Second Iteration Plan Review and
Comments
LS 1 $8,600.00
3 Third Iteration Plan Review and Comments
(If required)
LS 1 $3,800.00
4 Final Plan Review, Approvals LS 1 $2,400.00
5 Deferred Submittals LS 1 $6,200.00
PROJECT COST PROPOSAL (Task 1 through 5) $ 42,800.00
Timeline is defined in Exhibit A.
151

EXHIBIT C

ANTI-LOBBYING CERTIFICATION
Consultant shall submit to City this certification prior to or at the time of the execution of this Agreement.

The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge or belief, that:

Consultant:

Name, Title
By:________________________________________
152
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 7
Agenda Item: Grant Acceptance and Fund Appropriation for Campground Restroom Relocation Executive Summary: On November 17, 2020 City Council approved staff to submit a Per Capita grant application to The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation in the maximum grant amount of $177,952.00 towards components of the proposed new multi-generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility. The completed grant application was submitted on November 03, 2021. In addition, on March 16, 2021 City Council approved staff to submit another grant application to the State Dept. of Parks and Recreation for the same project through the Recreational Infrastructure Revenue Enhancement (RIRE) Grant Program for the maximum grant amount of $250,000.00. This grant application was submitted on November 10, 2021. On November 12, 2021 the City was awarded the Per Capita Grant, and on January 6, 2022 the City was awarded the RIRE Grant. Both Grant Awards are funded through the 2018 Parks Bond Act (Proposition 68) and have the same contract terms, conditions, and expiration date.

Project execution can begin January 22, 2022 and the project scope must be completed no later than December 31, 2023.

The primary purpose of any building constructed or improved with these funding sources must be for public recreation or elements associated with recreation as well as adhere to the timeline set forth in the grant contracts (attachment 03). To meet the timeline and project eligibility, staff chose one of the first construction components necessary to begin the implementation of construction of the new Multi-Generational Recreation and Aquatics Center, which was relocation of the existing restrooms located in the Campground.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution to accept grant awards in the amount of $427,952 through the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation Proposition 68 Per Capita and RIRE grant funding programs and appropriate said grant awards towards the relocation of the existing restroom located at the City’s campground for purposes of clearing the existing site for the construction of the city’s new Multi-Generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility.

Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvement Projects Manager Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvements Manager (530) 542-6027 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report Per Capita and RIRE Grant Awards.docx
02 -Resolution to Accept Grant.docx
03-Grant Contracts (Exh. A to Reso.).pdf
153
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: Grant Acceptance and Funding Appropriation for Campground Restroom Relocation Location: 56-Acre Parcel - 1150 Rufus Allen Boulevard
Responsible Staff Member: Jim Marino, Capital Improvements Manager (530) 542-6027 Background: On November 17, 2020 City Council approved staff to submit a Per Capita grant application to The State of California Department of Parks and Recreation in the maximum grant amount of $177,952.00 towards components of the proposed new multi-generational Recreation and Aquatics Facility. The completed grant application was submitted on November 03, 2021. In addition, on March 16, 2021 City Council approved staff to submit another grant application to the State Dept. of Parks and Recreation for the same project through the Recreational Infrastructure Revenue Enhancement (RIRE) Grant Program for the maximum grant amount of $250,000.00. This grant application was submitted on November 10, 2021. On November 12, 2021 the City was awarded the Per Capita Grant, and on January 6, 2022 the City was awarded the RIRE Grant. Both Grant Awards are funded through the 2018 Parks Bond Act (Proposition 68) and have the same contract terms, conditions, and expiration date. Project execution can begin January 22, 2022 and the project scope must be completed no later than December 31, 2023.

Issue and Discussion: The primary purpose of any building constructed or improved with these funding sources must be for public recreation or elements associated with recreation as well as adhere to the timeline set forth in the grant contracts (attachment 03). To meet the timeline and project eligibility, staff chose one of the first construction components necessary to begin the implementation of construction of the new Multi-Generational Recreation and Aquatics Center, which was relocation of the existing restrooms located in the Campground.

The existing prefabricated restroom facility was installed in 2019 prior to final site selection of the new multigenerational recreation and aquatics center. Unfortunately, the proposed recreation center site requires the relocation of this facility. Phase 1 of the recreation center project includes the scope to dismantle, relocate the restroom including all necessary utilities, walkways, and access points at a new location within the existing campground area that will not be disturbed by the recreation center project. The existing restroom facility is a prefabricated concrete structure comprising of three independent sections. Structural floor slabs are built into the sections; thus, foundations and slabs are not required for the installation of the units. The three separate sections are placed on structural fill, aligned, then post tensioned together. Final plumbing and electrical are then installed and the unit become usable.

Financial Implications: Utilization of both grants will support the anticipated full construction costs of the relocation project. There are no matching funds required for these grant programs due to the project area median household income and meeting the funding criteria for “severely disadvantaged community”.

Grant funds are paid in arrears on a reimbursement basis; withholding 10% retention until all grant requirements are met and final invoice and reporting is submitted and approved. Upon acceptance of both grant awards, funds should be appropriated into the current FY 21/22 budget as shown below in Table A and as described with the attached resolution (Attachment 02). 154
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2
Table A – Grant Revenue and Project Expenditures Appropriations Environmental Considerations: On January 18, 2022 City Council approved the initial environmental study and mitigated negative declaration for the 56-Acre project area in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 er seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.).

Policy Implications: Per Financial Management- Grant Funding and Compliance Policy approved by City Council on Sept. 8, 2020; section 3.2 City Council Approval to Accept Award: City Council approval to accept an award and appropriate budget is required for ALL Grant Awards. A detailed staff report and a resolution (if required) should be brought forth to City Council for Council approval/adoption.

REVENUE EXPENSE
Fund/Account Description (Increase)/Decrease Increase/(Decrease) 301-60069-33228 Prop 68 Per Capita Grant (177,952)
301-60069-33229 Other State Grant Revenue (250,000)
301-60069-48030 Construction 427,952
155
Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 5, 2022
Acceptance of Grant Awards in the amount of $427,952 through California Department of Parks and Recreation, Proposition 68 Per Capita Fund and Recreational Infrastructure Revenue Enhancement (RIRE) Program

BACKGROUND
A. On June 5, 2018, voters passed Proposition 68 by 57.6 percent. The $4 billion Parks, Environment, and Water Bond Act of 2018 has been appropriated in numerous State grant and funding opportunities. Some of which are through the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation to assist in the development and enhancement of state and local parks and recreational facilities.

B. On November 17, 2020 City Council approved the submittal of a Per Capita Grant application in the amount of $177,952.00 to assist in the funding requirements of components of the City’s new Recreation and Aquatics Center.

This application was awarded on November 12, 2021.

C. On March 16, 2021 City Council approved the submittal of a Recreational Infrastructure Revenue Enhancement Grant application in the amount of $250,000 to also assist in the funding requirements of components of the City’s new Recreation and Aquatics Center. This application was awarded January 6, 2022.

D. The City of South Lake Tahoe agrees to complete the Grant Scope as defined in the Grant Scope/Cost Estimate form filed with the State of California.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Authorizes the acceptance of Grant Awards in the amount of $427,952 through the California Department of Parks and Recreation Per Capita Fund and Recreational Infrastructure Revenue Enhancement Program.

2. Agrees to the terms and conditions of the Grant Contract (attached hereto as Exhibit A) and acknowledges that the State of California, acting through its Director of Department of Parks and Recreation, pursuant to the State of California, agrees to fund the total grant amount as indicated below.
156
Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2

3. Certifies that the City Manager, or his/her designee is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of South Lake Tahoe all grant documents, including but not limited to, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to expend grant funds and implement the approved grant project.

4. Authorizes the appropriation of grant funds and project expenditures into the fiscal year 21/22 annual capital improvement project budget as follows:

Capital Improvements Program Account: 301 60069 Campground Restrooms project
Revenue: 33228: $177,952
Revenue: 33229: $250,000
Expenses: 48030: $427,952
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 5, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
______________________________________ Date: _________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
____________________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
157
18-09-008
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 1/19/2022
158
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 159
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 160
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 161
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 162
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 163
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 164
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 1/19/2022
165
DocuSign Envelope ID: B554E86A-5951-4926-A27E-B2EA096C1A6F 166
RI-09-001
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 1/19/2022
167
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 168
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 169
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 170
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 171
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 172
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 173
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 174
DocuSign Envelope ID: 02F4C35D-457C-4D20-8455-F3C0D063456B 1/19/2022
175
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 8
Agenda Item: Ordinance - Amendments to Cannabis Ordinance Prohibiting On-Site Consumption, Allowing Increased Cultivation Canopy of 22,000 Square Feet, and Allowing Owners and Operators to Hold More Than One Non-Retail Permit (Second Reading)
Executive Summary: On March 15, 2022, City Council held a first reading of the ordinance and referred second reading to the meeting on April 5, 2022. The ordinance amends the City's cannabis regulations to allow increased canopy size up to 22,000 square feet with certain renewable energy and energy efficiency requirements, and allows owners and operators of cannabis businesses to hold more than one non-retail permit. The ordinance also allows the open permit types including retail (1) , cultivation (2), and manufacturing (4) to be combined into one or more microbusinesses with a distribution component. The ordinance allows the City Council to adopt a resolution to reopen the application period to allow additional cannabis businesses to apply for these open permit types. The ordinance also makes certain updates based on changes in applicable state law.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: 1) Pass a Motion finding that the 2030 General Plan EIR adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed ordinance and that no further environmental analysis is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act; and 2) Pass a motion to hold a second reading (by title only) and adopt an Ordinance amending Article X (Cannabis Regulations) of Chapter 6.55 of the South Lake Tahoe City Code to prohibit on-site consumption, allow increased cultivation canopy of 22,000 square feet, and allow owners and operators to hold more than one non-retail permit
Responsible Staff Member: Heather Stroud, City Attorney Responsible Staff Member: Heather Stroud, City Attorney (530) 542-6046 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Attachments:
01 - Staff Report - City Council Second Reading.docx
02 - Ordinance.docx
176
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: Amendments to Cannabis Ordinance Prohibiting On-site Consumption, Allowing Increased Cultivation Canopy of 22,000 Square Feet, and Allowing Owners and Operators to Hold More Than One Non-Retail Permit (Second Reading) Location: Citywide
Responsible Staff Member: Heather L. Stroud, City Attorney (530) 542-6046 Background:

On February 5, 2019, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2019-1126 (“Cannabis Ordinance”), which regulates cannabis businesses in order to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of and visitors to the City of South Lake Tahoe. On August 21, 2018, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2018-1119 (“Public Safety License Ordinance”) to set forth the requirements for cannabis businesses to obtain a Public Safety License from the Police Department. Since then, the City has issued Cannabis Use Permits, Public Safety Licenses, and Development Agreements to five cannabis businesses to operate in the City, in addition to the existing dispensary (Tahoe Wellness Center). There are three permitted retailers with delivery:

Embarc Tahoe, Cannablue, and Tahoe Green, and two microbusinesses received permits: Perfect Union SLT and Redefining Organics. The existing dispensary and retailers are open for business and have been operating adult-use cannabis businesses under the Cannabis Ordinance.

Redefining Organics opened for business in November 2021, and the City Council terminated Perfect Union SLT’s Development Agreement and Cannabis Use Permit on June 15, 2021.

The Cannabis Subcommittee (Mayor Middlebrook and Councilmember Friedrich) reviewed the Cannabis Ordinance with staff and met with stakeholders including the cannabis businesses and members of the cannabis stakeholder group which was convened to assist with developing the Cannabis Ordinance in 2017-2018. In addition to the cannabis businesses, stakeholders participating in the meeting with the Cannabis Subcommittee on April 6, 2021, included representatives from Tahoe Alliance for Safe Kids, Lake Tahoe Unified School District, South Tahoe Chamber, Live Violence Free, and Boys and Girls Club of Lake Tahoe. The Cannabis Subcommittee sought and received feedback from stakeholders on the following proposed amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance: (1) allowing retailers to include on-site consumption lounges; (2) allowing permittees to hold more than one Cannabis Use Permit; (3) increasing the allowable canopy size for indoor cultivation; and (4) establishing a cannabis tax. The Cannabis Subcommittee also received generally positive feedback from stakeholders on the City’s existing regulations and the impact of the cannabis industry on the community including financial contributions to local organizations.

On May 18, 2021, the Cannabis Subcommittee presented its recommendations for amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance to City Council. At that time, City Council directed the Subcommittee 177
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 3
and staff to hold a public workshop to receive input prior to bringing the discussion back to City Council. On June 22, 2021, the Subcommittee hosted a workshop via Zoom and received feedback on the City’s current cannabis regulations and operating cannabis businesses as well as the proposed amendments: (1) to allow consumption lounges at permitted cannabis retail businesses; (2) to allow cannabis businesses to hold more than one non-retail permit; and (3) to increase the maximum allowed canopy size for indoor cannabis cultivation from 5000 sq. ft. up to 22,000 sq. ft. The workshop was attended by 13 cannabis business owners and community members. Feedback received at the workshop was generally positive.

On October 19, 2021, staff brought the results of the public workshop back to City Council for direction. City Council members expressed some concern about allowing on-site consumption at this time as there are not currently robust alternative transportation options available for customers who may become impaired, and there are still no measurable limits for testing cannabis impairment while driving, unlike alcohol. Ultimately, however, Council directed staff to draft an ordinance to be brought back for consideration to include on-site consumption, allowing cannabis businesses to hold more than one non-retail permit, and increase the maximum allowed canopy size. Accordingly, two versions of the ordinance were drafted for consideration: one allowing onsite consumption (Version 1) and one continuing to prohibit it (Version 2). In addition to these changes, minor updates were to reflect changes in state law including the creation of the Department of Cannabis Control and amendments to some of the statutory definitions included in the ordinance.

On February 10, 2022, the Planning Commission considered both versions of the Ordinance, and adopted a resolution recommending that City Council adopt Version 1 of the ordinance to allow on-site consumption. The Planning Commission also recommended that the ordinance include energy efficiency and renewable energy requirements for businesses taking advantage of the increased cultivation canopy size.

On March 15, 2022, City Council voted 3-1, with Councilmember Bass absent, to hold a first reading of Version 2, continuing to prohibit on-site consumption but making the other changes recommended by the Planning Commission.

Issue and Discussion:

On-Site Consumption
City Council elected not to allow on-site consumption at cannabis retailers at this time, so the ordinance would continue to prohibit on-site consumption.

Allowing Permittees to Hold Multiple Permits
South Lake Tahoe City Code section 6.55.740(A)(3) currently prohibits an owner and/or operator of a cannabis business from owning or operating more than one cannabis business within the City. The amendments to the ordinance would allow permittees to hold more than one permit, except that retail permittees should continue to be allowed to hold only one retail permit.

Additionally, open permit types could be combined into additional microbusinesses, and these microbusinesses would be allowed to include a distribution component. As amended, the City would have open permits for retail (1), cultivation (2), and manufacturing (4), which could be combined into one or more microbusinesses with a distribution component. 178
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 3 of 3
Increasing Maximum Cultivation Size
The maximum canopy size for cultivators is currently limited to 5,000 square feet for cultivation permits and 10,000 square feet for microbusiness permits under South Lake Tahoe City Code sections 6.55.800(C)(2) and (E)(3), respectively. The amendments would increase the allowable canopy size for cultivation permits to be consistent with the limits for “medium indoor” cultivation in state law, which is 22,000 square feet of total canopy under 4 Cal. Code Regs. section 16201(d).

The maximum canopy size for microbusiness cultivation would remain at 10,000 square feet, which is the state limit. The Department of Cannabis Control regulations in 4 Cal. Code Regs. sections 16304 through 16310 require cultivators to comply with environmental protection measures, renewable energy requirements, and pest management measures. The revisions recommended by the Planning Commission are incorporated to require renewable energy and energy efficiency measures for businesses taking advantage of the increased canopy size.

Financial Implications:

The proposed amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance could result in additional revenue to the City if they result in additional business activities, in the form of additional community benefit fees, sales tax, and a cannabis tax, if adopted.

Environmental Considerations:

The proposed amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance would allow for additional or expanded cannabis business activities, however they do not change the intensity or density of cannabis business uses beyond what is currently allowed in Table 6.55.740. The proposed ordinance is consistent with the 2030 General Plan policies. The 2030 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed ordinance. The General Plan EIR is available on the City website at:
https://www.cityofslt.us/575/General-Plan. No further environmental analysis is required under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines section 15162 because the proposed ordinance is within the scope of the previous EIR and there are no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances that require major revisions to the previous EIR due to new significant environmental effects not discussed in the previous EIR, significant effects previously examined that would be more severe, or mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible that would substantially reduce one or more significant effects.

Policy Implications:

Applicable General Plan policies include:

Policy LU‐5.1: Locally Serving Commercial
The City shall ensure that commercial uses are responsive to the needs and wishes of the community and encourage users to shop locally, which will reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) from purchasing items outside the Lake Tahoe Basin.

Policy ED‐1.1: High‐Tech and Environmentally-Sustainable Business The City shall support programs and activities that promote business/job retention, expansion, and new business/job development including high‐tech and environmentallysustainable businesses.

Policy ED‐1.7: Year‐Round Community
The City shall provide economic incentives and regulatory reform that support an economically diverse and prosperous year‐round community for city residents and visitors alike. 179
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 8
Ordinance 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 5, 2022
An Ordinance Amending Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code to Continue to Prohibit On-Site Consumption at Cannabis Retailers, to Increase Allowed Canopy Size of Indoor Cultivation to 22,000 Square Feet, and to Allow Owners and Operators to Hold More Than One Non-Retail Permit

FINDINGS
A. On February 5, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2019-1126 (“Cannabis Ordinance”), which regulates cannabis businesses in order to ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of and visitors to the City of South Lake Tahoe.

B. On May 18 and October 19, 2021, the City Council conducted public meetings to solicit public comment on and discuss potential amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance.

C. On October 19, 2021, the City Council provided direction to staff to draft amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance to be brought back for consideration in early 2022.

D. On February 10, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance and the associated environmental analysis.

E. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-001 recommending that City Council adopt amendments to the Cannabis Ordinance to continue to allow on-site consumption at cannabis retailers, increase allowed canopy size of indoor cultivation to 22,000 square feet, and to allow owners and operators to hold more than one non-retail permit. Planning Commission also recommended that the ordinance be amended to require that cannabis cultivators taking advantage of the increased canopy size between 5,000 and 22,000 square feet be required to implement renewable energy and energy efficiency measures.

Now, Therefore, the City Council of City of South Lake Tahoe does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 6.55.710 (Definitions) of Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

For the purposes of this article, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings:
“Applicant” means any person who is required to file an application for a cannabis use permit and development agreement to operate a cannabis business under this article, including without limitation an individual owner, operator, or agent of a cannabis business. 180
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 8
“Cannabis” shall have the meaning set forth in Section 26001(e) of the Business and Professions Code and as subsequently amended.
“Cannabis business” shall include:
a. Any business, facility, use, establishment, property, or location, whether fixed or mobile, where a commercial cannabis activity takes place.
b. Any building, facility, use, establishment, property, or location where any person or entity establishes, commences, engages in, conducts, or carries on, or permits another person or entity to establish, commence, engage in, conduct, or carry on, any activity that requires a state license under Business and Professions Code Section 26000 and following, including but not limited to cannabis cultivation, cannabis distribution, cannabis manufacture, cannabis testing and cannabis retail sales, and the operation of a cannabis microbusiness. “Cannabis product” shall have the same meaning as in Section 11018.1 of the Health and Safety Code.
“Canopy” means all areas occupied by any portion of a cannabis plant, encompassing all vertical planes (i.e., stacking of plants), whether contiguous or noncontiguous on any one site. The canopy shall be measured by taking the longest length and widest width of existing plants (including all gaps, walkways, and open areas between plants) and multiplying the longest length by the longest width to get the area of the cannabis canopy. Each level of a stacked cultivation will be calculated as a separate canopy.
“Commercial cannabis activity” shall include the cultivation, possession, manufacturing, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, packaging, labeling, transportation, delivery or sale of cannabis and cannabis products, or acting as a cannabis event organizer for temporary cannabis events.
“Cultivation” means any activity involving the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing, grading, or trimming of cannabis.
“Cultivator” means any cannabis business engaged in cultivation activities, but specifically excluding cultivation in a private residence or accessory dwelling unit authorized pursuant to SLTCC 6.55.720. “Day care center” shall have that meaning as set forth Section 1596.76 of the Health and Safety Code.
“Delivery” means the commercial transfer of cannabis or cannabis products to a customer or patient. “Delivery” also includes the use by a retailer of any technology platform. “Delivery operation” means a cannabis business that engages in or otherwise provides deliveries. “Distribution” means the procurement, sale, and transport of cannabis and cannabis products between licensees.
“Distributor” means any cannabis business engaged in distribution. “Drug paraphernalia” shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11014.5, and as subsequently amended.
“Edible cannabis product” means cannabis that is intended to be used, in whole or in part, for human consumption.
181
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 3 of 8
“Extraction” means a process by which cannabinoids are separated from cannabis plant material through chemical or physical means.
“Identification card” shall have the meaning set forth in California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.712, and as may be amended from time to time.
“Manufacture” means to compound, blend, extract, infuse, package, label, or otherwise make or prepare a cannabis product.
“Manufacturer” means any cannabis business that conducts any activities involving the manufacture of a cannabis product.
“Medicinal cannabis” or “medicinal cannabis product” shall have the meaning set forth in California Business and Professions Code Section 26001(ai), which includes cannabis or a cannabis product, respectively, intended to be sold for use pursuant to the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (Proposition 215), found at California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5, by a medicinal cannabis patient in California who possesses a physician’s recommendation.
“Medical marijuana dispensary” shall mean a cooperative or collective of four or more members associating at a particular location or real property to cooperatively distribute cannabis to members for medical purposes and that operates on a not-for-profit basis. “Microbusiness” means a cannabis business that engages in commercial cannabis activities of at least three of the following types of cannabis businesses: retailer, distributor, manufacturer, cultivator. “Operator” shall mean any person responsible for management of the cannabis business; any person listed as an officer, director, manager, or member in the Statement of Information filed with the Secretary of State for a cannabis business; any person listed in a governing document for a cannabis business, such as bylaws, articles of incorporation, or operating agreement; any person owning an interest in the cannabis business, unless the interest is solely a security, lien, or encumbrance; and any person that supervises an employee of the cannabis business. “Owner” shall have that meaning set forth in Section 26001(am) of the Business and Professions Code and as it may be amended.
“Package” or “packaging” means any container or wrapper that may be used for enclosing or containing any cannabis products. The term “package” does not include any shipping container or outer wrapping used solely for the transportation of cannabis products in bulk quantity to another licensee or licensed premises.
“Park” shall mean any land, with public access, intended to provide recreation. For the purposes of this article, “park” also includes public beaches.
“Permittee” shall mean any person issued a cannabis use permit under this article. “Physician” shall mean a licensed medical doctor, including a doctor of osteopathic medicine as defined in the California Business and Professions Code. “Property” shall mean the designated structure or structures and land specified in the cannabis use permit application that is owned, leased or otherwise held under the control of the applicant or permittee where the commercial cannabis activity will be or is conducted. “Retailer” means any cannabis business that engages in the sale of cannabis or cannabis products to customers, including medical and adult-use cannabis or cannabis products. 182
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 4 of 8
“School” means any public or private school providing instruction in kindergarten or any of grades one to 12, inclusive, but does not include any private school in which education is primarily conducted in private homes.
“State cannabis laws” means and includes California Health and Safety Code Sections 11362.1 through 11362.45; California Health and Safety Code Section 11362.5 (Compassionate Use Act of 1996); California Health and Safety Code Sections 11362.7 to 11362.83 (Medical Marijuana Program); California Business and Professions Code Section 26000 et seq. (Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA)); all state laws enacted or amended pursuant to SB-94, Chapter 27, Statutes of 2017; the California Attorney General’s Guidelines for the Security and Non-Diversion of Marijuana Grown for Medical Use issued in August 2008, as such guidelines may be revised from time to time by action of the Attorney General; California Labor Code Section 147.5; California Revenue and Taxation Code Sections 34010 through 34021.5; California Fish and Game Code Section 12029; California Water Code Section 13276; all state regulations adopted by the Department of Cannabis Control; any license issued by the Department of Cannabis Control; and all other applicable laws of the state of California regulating cannabis or cannabis products. “Testing laboratory” means a laboratory, facility, or entity that offers or performs tests of cannabis or cannabis products.
“Youth centers” shall mean any youth center, as defined in Section 11353.1(e)(2) of the Health and Safety Code, any playground, as defined in Section 11353.1(e)(1) of the Health and Safety Code, and any child day care facility, as that term is defined in Section 1596.750 of the Health and Safety Code.

SECTION 2. Subsection 6.55.740(A) (Cannabis Businesses Allowed) of Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is amended to read as follows:

A. Cannabis Businesses Allowed.

1. Only those types of cannabis businesses set forth in this section shall be allowed within the city:
a. Retailers.
b. Microbusinesses.
c. Testing labs.
d. Cultivators.
e. Manufacturers.
f. Distributors.
g. Delivery operations.
h. Existing permitted medical marijuana dispensaries, subject to SLTCC 6.55.840.

Any and all cannabis businesses, activities, nonprofits, associations, enterprises, collectives, cooperatives or dispensaries not expressly described herein are expressly prohibited. Temporary cannabis events are prohibited within the city.

2. No more than one cannabis business may exist in the same suite or unit on a lot or parcel of property.
183
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 5 of 8

3. An owner and/or operator of a cannabis business may not own or operate more than one retail cannabis business, including a microbusiness with a retailer component, within the city.

4. No more than four retailers are permitted in the city, including microbusinesses with a retailer component.

5. No more than two microbusinesses are permitted in the city, unless after the application period referenced in SLTCC 6.55.750(C) there are open permits for retailers, cultivators, manufacturers, or distributors, in which case the city council may adopt a resolution to reopen the application period to allow additional microbusinesses combining the open permit types.

6. No more than two cultivators are permitted in the city.

7. No more than four manufacturers are permitted in the city.

8. Distributors are permitted in the city only as part of a microbusiness, unless one or more of the permitted microbusinesses do not include a distributor component, in which case a distributor shall be permitted for each microbusiness without a distributor component.

9. Medical marijuana dispensaries operating under SLTCC 6.55.840 shall not be considered in determining the number of retailers, microbusinesses, manufacturers, distributors, or cultivators allowed under subsections (A)(4) through (A)(8) of this section. The maximum number of cannabis businesses permitted under the numerical limitations set forth in subsections (A)(4) through (A)(8) of this section are in addition to any medical marijuana dispensaries operating under SLTCC 6.55.840.

SECTION 3. Subsection 6.55.760(B) (Supplemental Findings – Cannabis Testing Laboratory) of Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

B. Supplemental Findings – Cannabis Testing Laboratory. In addition to the findings required for the approval of a cannabis use permit as set forth in subsection (A) of this section, the planning commission, or the city council on appeal, shall consider the following supplemental findings in determining whether to grant, modify, or deny a cannabis use permit for a testing lab:

1. The owners, permittees, operators, and employees of the testing lab will not be associated with any other form of commercial cannabis activity.

2. The testing lab meets the accreditation requirements set forth in Business and Professions Code Section 26100(h) and any applicable regulations enacted by the Department of Cannabis Control.

3. The testing lab operating plan demonstrates proper protocols and procedures for statistically valid sampling methods and accurate certification of cannabis and cannabis products for potency, purity, pesticide residual levels, mold, and other contaminants according to adopted industry standards.

SECTION 4. Subsection 6.55.760(C) (Supplemental Findings – Cultivators) of Article X of Chapter

6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

C. Supplemental Findings – Cultivators. In addition to the findings required for the approval of a cannabis use permit as set forth in subsection (A) of this section, the planning commission, or the city 184
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 6 of 8
council on appeal, shall consider the following supplemental findings in determining whether to grant, modify, or deny a cannabis use permit for a cultivator:

1. The cultivation of cannabis for commercial purposes shall only be cultivated within a fully enclosed space.

2. The cultivation of cannabis for commercial purposes shall be limited to 22,000 square feet of total canopy size per property.

3. The cultivation of cannabis will be conducted in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the use of pesticides.

4. The applicant for cultivation for cultivation of cannabis with a total canopy size greater than 5,000 square feet per property has submitted documentation that electrical power used for commercial cannabis activity meets the average electricity greenhouse gas emissions intensity required by the local utility provider pursuant to the California Renewables Portfolio Standard Program, and has submitted an energy efficiency plan showing measures being taken to minimize energy consumption in lighting, HVAC, and dehumidifying equipment.

SECTION 5. Subsection 6.55.760(D) (Supplemental Findings – Manufacturers) of Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

D. Supplemental Findings – Manufacturers. In addition to the findings required for the approval of a cannabis use permit as set forth in subsection (A) of this section, the planning commission, or the city council on appeal, shall consider the following supplemental findings in determining whether to grant, modify, or deny a cannabis use permit for a manufacturer:

1. The manufacturer shall be limited to 2,500 square feet of fully enclosed space.

2. The manufacturer shall not undertake any volatile extraction activities, and shall only conduct the operations authorized under the “Type 6,” “Type N,” or “Type P” license categories, as defined in the Department of Cannabis Control regulations, Title 4 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 17006, as may be amended.

SECTION 6. Subsection 6.55.800(A)(13) (On-Site Consumption) of Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

13. On-Site Consumption. On-site consumption is prohibited.

SECTION 7. Subsection 6.55.800(C) (Supplemental Conditions – Cultivators) of Article X of Chapter

6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

C. Supplemental Conditions – Cultivators. In addition to each of the conditions of operation set forth in subsection (A) of this section, a cannabis cultivation operation shall be operated, maintained, and managed in compliance with the following supplemental conditions:

1. Outdoor commercial cultivation prohibited. The cultivation of cannabis for commercial purposes may only be cultivated within a fully enclosed space.

2. The cultivation of cannabis for commercial purposes shall be limited to 22,000 square feet of total canopy size per property.
185
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 7 of 8

3. The cultivation of cannabis must be conducted in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations governing the use of pesticides. Any fumigation or insecticidal fogging shall comply with the California Fire Code Chapter 26 (Fumigation and Insecticidal Fogging).

4. Screening. Cannabis plants shall not be visible from any location beyond the property.

5. Cultivators shall maintain either the “Type 1A” (specialty indoor), “Type 1B” (specialty mixedlight), “Type 1C” (specialty cottage), “Type 2A” (small indoor), “Type 2B”) (small mixed-light), “Type 3A” (indoor), “Type 3B” (mixed-light) or “Type 4” (nursery) licenses as defined in Business and Professions Code Section 26061, and issued by the Department of Cannabis Control, at all times of operation.

6. Cultivators may not engage in retail sales at the same property as cultivation.

SECTION 8. Subsection 6.55.800(E)(2) of Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

2. Microbusinesses undertaking manufacturing activity shall utilize only extraction processes that employ nonvolatile solvents for the purposes of extracting cannabinoids and processes that are recognized as safe pursuant to the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Microbusinesses undertaking manufacturing activity shall maintain a license of the “Type 6,” “Type N,” or “Type P” license categories, as defined in Title 4 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 17006, as may be amended.

SECTION 9. Subsection 6.55.800(F) (Supplemental Conditions – Manufacturers) of Article X of Chapter 6.55 (Cannabis Regulations) of the South Lake Tahoe City Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

F. Supplemental Conditions – Manufacturers. In addition to each of the conditions of operation set forth in subsection (A) of this section, manufacturers shall be operated, maintained, and managed in compliance with the following supplemental conditions:

1. Manufacturers shall not engage in on-site retail sales of cannabis or cannabis products.

2. Manufacturers shall utilize only extraction processes that employ nonvolatile solvents and are recognized as safe pursuant to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

3. Standard of Equipment. Manufacturing, processing, and analytical testing devices used by manufacturers must be UL (Underwriters Laboratories) listed or otherwise certified by an approved third party testing agency or engineer and approved for the intended use by the city’s building official and fire code official.

4. Food Handler Certification. All owners, employees, volunteers, or other individuals that participate in the production of edible cannabis products shall be state-certified food handlers.

The valid certificate number of each such owner, employee, volunteer, or other individual must be on record at the property where the individual participates in the production of edible cannabis products.

5. Edible Cannabis Product Manufacturing. Manufacturers that sell or manufacture edible cannabis products shall obtain a county health permit to sell and/or manufacture edible cannabis products. Permit holders shall comply with county health permit requirements. 186
Ordinance 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 8 of 8

6. The manufacturer shall maintain a manufacturer license of “Type 6,” “Type N,” or “Type P” license categories, as defined in Title 4 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 17006, as may be amended.

SECTION 10. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision will not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 11. The City Council finds that the 2030 General Plan EIR adequately addresses the potential environmental impacts of the proposed ordinance and that no further environmental analysis is required to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and CEQA Guidelines section 15162 because the proposed ordinance is within the scope of the previous EIR and there are no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances that require major revisions to the previous EIR due to new significant environmental effects, new information of substantial importance that shows the project will have significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, significant effects previously examined would be more severe, or mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would substantially reduce one or more significant effects.

SECTION 12. The City Clerk is directed to certify this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law.

SECTION 13. This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days following its adoption.

Yes:

No:

Abstain:

Absent:
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
First Reading: March 15, 2022
Published:

Effective:
187
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 9
Agenda Item: Sugar Pine Village Affordable Housing Project - Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA)
Executive Summary: Sugar Pine Housing Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership, (the “Borrower”) has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “CMFA”) serve as the municipal issuer of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000 of tax-exempt revenue bonds. The City of South Lake Tahoe must conduct a public hearing (the “TEFRA Hearing”) providing for the members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the purpose of providing financing for a residential rental housing facility known as Sugar Pine Village Phase 1A.

Responsible Staff Member: Hilary Roverud, Development Services Director Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Associate Housing Planner Zach Thomas, Housing Manager
Hilary Roverud, Development Services Director
Reviewed and Approved By:

Hilary Roverud, Development Services Director
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - TEFRA.docx
02-Resolution - Sugar Pine Village Phase 1 TERFA.docx
188
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 3
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: Sugar Pine Village Affordable Housing Project – Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Public Hearing
Location: 1860 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 1029 Tata Lane
Responsible Staff Member: Jessica Wackenhut Lomeli, Associate Housing Planner Zach Thomas, Housing Manager (530) 542-7400
Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services
(530) 542-6024
Background: Sugar Pine Village (the “Project”) is a proposed 248-unit affordable housing project, with onsite community service facilities on 11.6 acres of land owned by the State of California and managed by the California Tahoe Conservancy (Conservancy). This project is a result of the Governor’s Executive Order N-06-19, which directed the California Department of General Services (DGS) to identify surplus state-owned properties as potential affordable housing development sites. Based on a collaborative effort underway to address housing affordability in Tahoe, the Conservancy partnered with DGS and the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to develop housing at 1860 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 1029 Tata Lane. In July 2020, the Conservancy announced the State had selected Related Companies of California LLC in partnership with the St. Joseph Community Land Trust to construct and manage the Sugar Pine Village project. Since June 2020, the City of South Lake Tahoe has been an active partner in the development of the project.

The Project has four financing phases. Phase 1A includes 68 residential units, Phase 1B 60 units, Phase 2A 60 units and Phase 2B 60 units.

Issue and Discussion: Sugar Pine Housing Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership, (the “Borrower”) has requested that the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “CMFA”) serve as the municipal issuer of the bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000 of tax-exempt revenue bonds. The proceeds of the bonds will be used to finance the Project and for the issuance of tax credits.

The Board of Directors of the California Foundation for Stronger Communities, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation located in Carlsbad, California (the “Foundation”), acts as the Board of Directors for the CMFA. Formed to assist local governments, non-profit organizations and businesses with the issuance of taxable and tax-exempt bonds, the CMFA was created on January 1, 2004 pursuant to a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement. This agreement stipulates that the CMFA is a public entity, separate and apart from each member entity and that debts, liabilities and obligations of the CMFA do not constitute debt, liabilities or obligations of member entities. Furthermore, there are no costs associated with membership in the CMFA and the City is in no way exposed to any financial liability by reason of its membership in the CMFA. To date, 189
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 3
over 330 municipalities, including the City of South Lake Tahoe, have become members of the CMFA which allows qualifying private projects within the City to be funded by bonds issued by the CMFA.

Under Section 147(f) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, in order for all or a portion of the bonds to qualify as tax-exempt bonds, the City of South Lake Tahoe must conduct a public hearing (the “TEFRA Hearing”) providing for the members of the community an opportunity to speak in favor of or against the use of tax-exempt bonds for the financing of the Project. Consistent with requirements for the TEFRA Hearing, public notice was provided to the members of the community. Following the close of the TEFRA Hearing, the City Council must vote on whether it approves issuance of the bonds for the financing of the Project.

Staff recommends the City Council adopt the resolution authorizing the issuance of revenue bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the purpose of providing financing for a residential rental housing facility known as Sugar Pine Village Phase 1A.

Financial Implications: The bonds to be issued by the CMFA for the Project will be the sole responsibility of the Borrower, and the City will have no financial, legal, moral obligation, liability or responsibility for repayment of the bonds for the financing of the Project. All financing documents with respect to the issuance of the bonds will contain clear disclaimers that the bonds are not obligations of the City or the State of California but are to be paid for solely from funds provided by the Borrower.

Through its conduit issuance activities, the CMFA shares a portion of the issuance fees it receives with its member communities and donates a portion of these issuance fees to the Foundation for the support of local charities. With respect to the City of South Lake Tahoe, it is expected that that a portion of the issuance fee attributable to the City will be granted by the CMFA to the general fund of the City. The payment to the City is estimated to be approximately $12,000-$15,000.

Environmental Considerations: For projects that satisfy criteria specified by SB 35, the guidelines issued by HCD specify that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to actions taken by a local government to provide financial assistance to a development that receives streamlined approval and that is to be used for housing for persons and families of very low, low, or moderate income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health and Safety Code.

Policy Implications: The recommended action is consistent with the City Strategic Plan which identifies supporting the Sugar Pine Village Project as Action Item 1.3.2.

The recommended action is also consistent with the following adopted policies and programs:

City General Plan Housing Element
Policy 1-1 The City shall adopt programs, ordinances, incentives, land use plans and other regulatory mechanisms that provide opportunities for the private sector to address the housing needs of citizens of all economic levels.

Policy 2-2 The City shall enable opportunities for deed-restricted affordable ownership housing to ensure long-term affordability.

Policy 2-5 The City shall recognize that it will become difficult to attract employees if they cannot afford to purchase or rent housing in South Lake Tahoe. The City shall encourage and support 190
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 3 of 3
programs and activities that create a robust local economy that provides residents with good paying employment and the means to purchase and/or rent housing in the city.

Program 2-1 PURSUE STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDS
To support the creation of quality, affordable housing options for extremely low-, very low-, and low-income households, the City shall seek and when appropriate and feasible pursue grant opportunities for state and federal funds.

Program 2-6 ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL AND STATE LANDS
The City shall continue discussing the potential for developing quality workforce and affordable housing on non-environmentally sensitive lands owned by the California Tahoe Conservancy (Conservancy) and the United States Forest Service (USFS). The City shall ensure that important natural resources are protected and only pursue surplus lands that these agencies have determined do not have a clear and compatible conservation or recreation purpose consistent with agency goals.

Tahoe Valley Area Plan
Policy H-1.1 – Housing Options
Provide for a range of housing options that include affordable, moderate-income, and workforce housing so that people can live and work in the City.

Policy H-1.5 – Redirection of Development
Direct high density residential development to areas of Tahoe Valley that are within walking distance of public transit and services.

Policy H-1.7 – Tahoe Livable Communities Program
Collaborate and support efforts of the California Tahoe Conservancy to remove blighted properties and repurpose associated development commodities. Encourage the use of residential commodities for affordable housing in Tahoe Valley area.

Policy H-2.1 – General
Encourage the creation of residential uses to support and add vitality to commercial and public service projects in the Tahoe Valley area.
191
Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 5, 2022
Approval of the Issuance of Revenue Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the Purpose of Providing Financing for a Residential Rental Housing Facility Known as Sugar Pine Village Phase 1A

BACKGROUND
A. Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California, certain public agencies (the “Members”) have entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Relating to the California Municipal Finance Authority, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the “Agreement”) in order to form the California Municipal Finance Authority (the “Authority”), for the purpose of promoting economic, cultural and community development, and in order to exercise any powers common to the Members, including the issuance of bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness. The City of South Lake Tahoe (the “City”) is a member of the Authority.

B. The Authority is authorized to issue and sell revenue bonds for the purpose, among others, of financing or refinancing the acquisition and rehabilitation of multifamily residential rental housing facilities. Sugar Pine Housing Partners, L.P., a California limited partnership (the “Borrower”) has requested that the Authority consider the issuance and sale of tax-exempt revenue bonds (the “Bonds”) in an amount not to exceed $35,000,000, and to use proceeds of the Bonds to make a loan to the Borrower to finance the acquisition and construction by the Borrower of a 68 unit multifamily rental housing facility currently known as Sugar Pine Village Phase 1A (the “Housing Facility”) located at 1860 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 1029 Tata Lane in the City, to be owned by the Borrower.

C. In order for the interest on the Bonds to be tax-exempt, section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), requires that an “applicable elected representative” of a governmental unit, the boundaries of which include the site at which the Housing Facility is located, hold a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds and approve the issuance of the Bonds following such hearing, and the Authority has determined that the City Council of the City is an “applicable elected representative” for purposes of holding such hearing.

D. The Authority has requested that the City Council of the City approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority, following the conduct of the public hearing, in order to satisfy the public approval requirement of section 147(f) of the Code and the requirements of section 4 of the Agreement.

E. Notice of the public hearing has been duly given as required by the Code, and the City Council has heretofore held such public hearing at which all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard on all matters relative to the location, financing and nature of 192
Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2
the Housing Facility and the Authority’s issuance of the Bonds therefor, and it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the City Council approve the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the aforesaid purposes.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Approves the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority. It is the purpose and intent of the City Council that this Resolution constitute approval of the issuance of the Bonds (a) by the “applicable elected representative” in accordance with section 147(f) of the Code, and (b) by the City Council in accordance with section 4 of the Agreement. The issuance of the Bonds shall be subject to the approval of the Authority of all financing documents relating thereto to which the Authority is a party. The City shall have no responsibility or liability whatsoever with respect to the repayment or administration of the Bonds.

2. Determines that the adoption of this Resolution shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to (i) provide any financing for the Housing Facility; (ii) approve any application or request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action necessary for the acquisition, rehabilitation or operation of the Housing Facility; (iii) make any contribution or advance any funds whatsoever to the Authority; or (iv) take any further action with respect to the Authority or its membership therein.

3. Authorizes and directs that the Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Finance, the City Clerk and all other proper officers and officials of the City execute such other documents and certificates, and perform such other acts, as may be necessary or convenient to effect the purposes of this Resolution and the issuance of the Bonds hereby approved.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 5, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:

Date:

Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
193
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 10
Agenda Item: Tentative Subdivision Map approval - 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard & 3709 Osgood Avenue Town Homes
Executive Summary: On February 10, 2022 the Planning Commission approved a multi-family town home project located at 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 3709 Osgood Avenue. The project includes three buildings with 14 residential units. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the units into condominiums. According to the California Subdivision Map Act, the subdivision of five (5) or more units requires approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map as well as a Final Subdivision Map and Condominium Plan.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map.

Responsible Staff Member: John Hitchcock, Planning Manager Responsible Staff Member: John Hitchcock, Planning Manager (530) 542-7472 Reviewed and Approved By:

Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Director of Finance
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report.docx
02-Tentative Map
03-Resolution - Tentative Map Approval.docx
04-CEQA Notice of Exemption.pdf
05-Presentation
194
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: 3708 Lake Tahoe Blvd & 3709 Osgood Avenue Town Homes Tentative Map, File #21- 142
Location: 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard & 3709 Osgood Avenue (APNs 027-072-032 & 027- 072-010)
Responsible Staff Members: John Hitchcock, Planning Manager (530) 542-7472 Background:

On February 10, 2022 the Planning Commission approved a multi-family town home project located at 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 3709 Osgood Avenue. The project includes three buildings with 14 residential units. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the units into condominiums. According to the California Subdivision Map Act, the subdivision of five (5) or more units requires approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map as well as a Final Subdivision Map and Condominium Plan. The Planning Commission passed a resolution at their regularly scheduled meeting on March 10, 2022 recommending the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivison Map (see Attachment 02).

Issue and Discussion:

MAP REVIEW
The Tentative Map (see Attachment 03) will merge two underlying parcels (APNs 027-072-032 & 027-072-010) into one lot that is for condominium purposes. Although the Subdivision Map Act does not require an applicant to depict boundaries of the condominiums, the applicant has elected to show them on the Tentative Map. The 14 units shown on the map depict the footprints of each condominium unit. Area outside of the condominium units are shown as common area. Also included are public utility and emergency access easements where the project driveway is located and a 10’ public access easement along the Lake Tahoe Blvd frontage. These proposed easements have been reviewed by the Public Works and Fire Department for adequacy.

As part of the project approval on February 10, 2022, the Planning Commission made findings that the project design is consistent with the City-Wide Design Standards and the Tourist Core Area Plan Design Standards. The Planning Commission recommendation from March 10, 2022 includes a finding that the design of the subdivision is suitable for the site, would not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or public health problems, and is consistent with the City General Plan and applicable standards.

Common Interest Developments (CID) such as proposed here are subject to compliance with the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (California Civil Code sections 4000 et seq.). This Act is intended to provide homeowners with a system of self-government and dispute resolution through a homeowner’s association. The California Department of Real Estate will 195
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 2
review the legal framework of the proposed CID to ensure compliance with the Subdivided Lands Law as part of the public report application process before homes are offered for sale to the public.

If the Tentative Map is approved, a Final Subdivision Map for condominium purposes must be submitted to the City within 24 months. The Final Subdivision Map will be accompanied by a condominium plan describing legal boundaries of each airspace unit. The Final Subdivision Map would be reviewed by the City Surveyor prior to approval by the City Council.

The Tentative Map is titled 3708 US 50 Town Homes. The address assigned to the property by the City is 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard. The Tentative Map approval has been conditioned to required the applicant to retitle the Final Map as “3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard.” The applicant has submitted a separate subdivision application to the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA).

FINDINGS
The following findings are required by the Subdivision Map Act for approval of a tentative subdivision map:

1. The project is consistent with the General Plan as specified in Government Code Section 65451.

The General Plan directs the City to utilize the Plan Area Statements (PAS), Community Plans, and Area Plans to guide land use policies and address land use issues. The project is located in the Tourist Core Area Plan Mixed-Use District, where single-family and multi-family residential are allowed uses. With the approval of the project by the City Planning Commission on February 10, 2020 the proposed uses were determined to be consistent with allowed uses in this area plan.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

The Tourist Core Mixed-Use District is zoned for higher-density residential development at 25 units per acre. The project includes 14 units on 0.74 acres, which is equal to 19 units per acre. As part of the project approval on February 10, 2022, the Planning Commission made findings that the project design is consistent with the City-Wide Design Standards and the Tourist Core Area Plan Design Standards.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

With the approval of the project by the City Planning Commission on February 10, 2022, the use was determined to be consistent with The Tourist Core Area Plan policies and standards as well as the City-Wide Design Standard. Moreover, the site is an infill site verified by TRPA to be a suitiable for development (i.e., Land Capability District Class 7) 196
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 3
and existing utilities (e.g., sewer, water and electricity) are found adjacent to the property.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The Tourist Core Mixed-Use District is zoned for higher-density residential development at 25 units per acre. The proposed project includes 14 units on 0.74 acres, which is equal to 19 units per acre.

5. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

On February 10, 2022 the City Planning Commission made the finding that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15332, Class 32, Infill Development, which consists of projects characterized as infill development on 1) parcels less than five acres in size located within the city limits, 2) is consistent with applicable general plan designations, policies and zoning designations, 3) has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, 4) would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and 5) is adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

6. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

With compliance with all City, County, State, TRPA, and Federal regulations, the project will not likely cause public health problems. The project must install water quality best management practices, mitigate potential air quality impacts and built to meet all fire and defensible space standards.

7. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

The tentative map submitted by the applicant indicates a public utility and emergency and public access eastment.

Environmental Analysis:

California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15332, Class 32, which consists of projects characterized as infill development meeting the following conditions:

1. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. 197
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 4
The project is consistent with the General Plan, which designates the parcel Tourist Center, where intensive land uses are encouraged, including major commercial/visitor centers and mixed-use residential. The TCAP encourages residential uses mixed with tourist uses and allows multi-family dwellings at 25-units per acre.

2. The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.

The project site is a vacant property located within the city limits of South Lake Tahoe and is 0.74 acres in size.

3. The project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species.

The project site has no known value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. The parcel has been verified by TRPA as high-capability land (Class 7), and there are no known stream environment zones on the parcel that would provide suitable habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Research of TRPA's wildlife database indicates that the nearest habitat is located in the Truckee Marsh west of the project site and the shores of Fallen Leaf Lake, which is not in the project vicinity.

4. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.

The proposed project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The City/TRPA Permits have been conditioned to require the project applicant to install street frontage improvements. The project is required to install Best Management Practices and treat all runoff onsite. The project's traffic impact was evaluated using TRPA's Project Impact Assessment tool, which determined that the VMTs generated (301 VMTs) are below the threshold of significance; however, the applicant must submit a mobility mitigation fee.

The proposed project would likely create less noise levels than surrounding commercial and tourist accommodation uses as a residential use.

5. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The site is adequately served by required utilities. South Tahoe Public Utility District, which provides water and sewer, has a mainline in Lake Tahoe Boulevard. Electricity is provided by Liberty Utilities, which has existing power poles located within the City rightof-way along the property frontage.

Police and Fire services would be provided by the City of South Lake Tahoe Police Department and Fire Department.
198
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 5
Public Notice:

Notice of this public hearing was provided to the public by a publication in the Tahoe Tribune on March 25, 2022 and to all property owners within 300 feet of the subject area by mail. No comments have been received as of the date of this report.

Financial Implications:

None
Policy Implications:

The development of the proposed multi-family dwelling project is consistent with the City Council's strategic priorities to provide a spectrum of housing needs and ensure housing availability for people of all economic, physical, social, and employment circumstances.

It should be noted that since the project is located in the Tourist Core Area Plan, the proposed project is eligible to obtain a vacation home rentals once the units are subdivide into residential condominiums.
199
200
Resolution 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council
April 5, 2022
Approve the Tentative Subdivision Map for 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 3709 Osgood Avenue, El Dorado County APNs 027- 072-032 and 027-072-010

BACKGROUND
A. On April 5, 2022 the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Tentative Subdivion Map (File #21-142) for 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 3709 Osgood Avenue, APNs 027-072-032 and 027-072-010.

B. A public notice was mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project and published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune on March 25, 2022.

C. On March 10, 2022 the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Tentative Subdivision Map.

D. The City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to receive public comments, considered evidence in the record and deliberated and found that the project is consistent with the City General Plan, the Tourist Core Area Plan, and the CityWide Design Standards and meets the findings required by the California Subdivision Map Act.

E. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution 2022-003 recommending the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council:

1. Finds that the tentative subdivision map is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15332, Class 32, Infill Projects.

2. Finds that the project is consistent with the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan.

3. Finds that the design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City of South Lake Tahoe General Plan and the Tourist Core Area Plan.

4. Finds that the site is physically suitable for the type of development.

5. Finds that the site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. 201
Resolution 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Page 2

6. Finds that the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

7. Finds that the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

8. Finds that the design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision.

9. Approves the tentative subdivision map based on the analysis in the staff report, the findings required by the California Subdivision Map Act, and subject to the following conditions of approval:
a. The initial life of the Tentative Map is 24 months unless otherwise extended as described in Government Code §66452.6.
b. The owner may file multiple Final Maps prior to the expiration of the Tentative Map as long as:
i. The subdivider gives notice to the City of its intent to do so; and ii. After filing the Tentative Map, the subdivider and City concur in the filing of multiple Final Maps (Government Code §66456.1). c. The Final Map shall include all information and statements required by Article 4 of the Subdivision Map Act.
d. The Final Map shall be prepared by or under the direction of a registered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor and shall conform to the provisions in §66434 of the Subdivision Map Act.
e. The City Council shall approve the Final Map per Section § 66440 of the Subdivision Map Act.
f. If Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions are recorded with the Department of Real Estate, the applicant shall provide a copy of such document to the City Planning Division.
g. Any amendment or modification to said document shall also be provided to the City Planning Division.
h. The Final Map shall be in substantial compliance with Major Design Review #21-142.
i. The Final Map shall be retitled “3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard Town Homes”. j. The Final Map shall include the overflight notification language required by the Lake Tahoe Airport Compatibility Land Use Plan.
k. The Final Map shall include easements, dedications, and cite cross access agreements and recorded deed restrictions to assure legal access to all parcels and condominium parcels to the public right-of-way as required by the Subdivision Map Act and as directed and approved by the City Surveyor. l. A Tentative Subdivision Map recommendation of approval by the City Council does not constitute Final Map approval.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council at a meeting on April 5, 2022, by the following vote:

Yes
202
Resolution 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Page 3
No
Absent
Abstain
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
203
Notice of Exemption Supplementary Document Q
To: Office of Planning and Research
State Clearinghouse
P.O. Box 3044
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044
From: City of South Lake Tahoe
1052 Tata Lane
South Lake Tahoe, CA
96150
County Clerk
Count of El Dorado
3368 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150
Project Title: 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard & 3709 Osgood Avenue Town Homes Tentative Map, File #21-142
Project Location - Specific: 3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard and 3709 Osgood Avenue/APNs 027-072- 027 and -032
Project Location - City: South Lake Tahoe
Project Location - County: El Dorado
Description of Project: The project is the subdivision of an approved 14 unit multi-family residential project. The subdivision will result in 14 residential condominiums.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: City of South Lake Tahoe Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project: SLRV Investments LLC Exempt Status: (check one)
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15332, Class 32 Statutory Exemptions. State code number:

Reasons why the project is exempt: The proposed project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15332, Class 22, which consists of projects characterized as infill development.

Lead Agency Contact Person: John M. Hitchcock
Area Code/Telephone: (530) 542-7472
Email: [email protected]
Signature: _______________________________ Title: Planning Manager Date: April 5, 2022
Signed by Lead Agency Date received for filing at OPR: ___________ Signed by Applicant
204
3708 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
& 3709 Osgood Avenue
Tentative Subdivision Map
City Council
April 5, 2022
205
• Construction of a 14-unit multi-family project
• Located at 3708 Lake Tahoe Blvd & 3709 Osgood
Avenue
• Design review approved by Planning Commission
February 10, 2022
• Tentative Subdivision Map approved by Planning
Commission on March 10, 2022
Project Description
206
207
 One-lot subdivision
 Tentative Map will merge the two underlying lots
 SMA does not require the applicant to depict the
condominiums; however, the applicant has elected to
show the condo units on the Tentative Map
 Proposed footprint
 Common area
 Public utility and emergency access easements
 And a public access easement
Tentative Subdivision Map
208
Tentative Map
209
 24-months to submit a Final Map with a
Condominium Plan
 Condominium Plan will provide legal boundaries for
each unit
 Requires review and approval by the City Surveyor
prior to City Council approval
Tentative Map
210
• Consistent with the General Plan
• Consistent with the Tourist Core Area Plan
• Site is suitable for this type of development (disturbed, high capability infill site)
• The site can accommodate the proposed density (25
units/acre)
• The site does not have any know value as habitat for fish or wildlife
• The subdivision will not cause serious public-health problems (BMPs, fire/defensible space, building code)
• The tentative map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large. A public utility and emergency access easement is delineated on the Tentative Map
SMA Findings
211
• CEQA
• The project is categorical exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 332, Class 32, which consists of projects
characterized as infill development
• City staff will file a Notice of Exemption with the State Clearinghouse and the El Dorado County Clerk
Environmental
212
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 11
Agenda Item: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control - Public Convenience or Necessity - Grocery Outlet
Executive Summary: Under State law, the issuance of a new alcohol retail license is prohibited in any area that has an undue concentration of alcohol outlets or high crime unless a determination is made that the license would serve public convenience or necessity. (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 23958.4). The determination of “public convenience or necessity” is either made by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), or by a local governing body, depending on the license type.

Where the ABC license type necessitates a determination of public convenience or necessity by the local governing body, the local governing body must issue a letter to ABC stating that it has made the finding of public convenience and necessity for ABC to issue a new alcohol retail license.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution approving issuance of a Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for the Issuance of a Type 21 License for the Premises at 2358 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (Grocery Outlet Inc.) Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner Responsible Staff Member: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner (530) 542-7405 Reviewed and Approved By:

Hilary Roverud, Director of Development Services
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01- Staff Report 22358LakeTahoeBlvd_22-017_PNC0220304.docx 02-ABC Application
03-Resolution - ABC Letter of Necessity - Grocery Outlet.docx 04- Letter of Public Necessity (Exh. A to Reso)
05-Notice of Public Hearing
213
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 1
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: ABC - Public Convenience or Necessity - Grocery Outlet Location: 2358 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (APN 031-020-041)
Responsible Staff Members: Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner (530) 542-7405 Background:

Under State law, the issuance of a new alcohol retail license is prohibited in any area that has an undue concentration of alcohol outlets or high crime unless a determination is made that the license would serve public convenience or necessity. (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 23958.4). The determination of “public convenience or necessity” is either made by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), or by a local governing body, depending on the license type.

Where the ABC license type necessitates a determination of public convenience or necessity by the local governing body, the local governing body must issue a letter to ABC stating that it has made the finding of public convenience or necessity for ABC to issue a new alcohol retail license.

Issue and Discussion:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This item is before the City Council to approve a Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) to the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for a liquor license request from Grocery Outlet, Inc. Grocery Outlet, Inc. has requested a new liquor license (Type 21 Off-Sale) in conjunction with an existing grocery business, “Grocery Outlet”, which operates at 2358 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, South Lake Tahoe. Grocery stores are an allowed use in the planning area.

Grocery Outlet currently operates with a Type 20 Off-Sale license that allows for the sale of beer and wine. In 2021, Grocery Outlet was successful in obtaining a Type 21 Off-Sale license from ABC, with a requirement that a PCN be obtained from the City of South Lake Tahoe. A Type 21 Off-Sale license would permit the sale of beer, wine, and spirits as an ancillary use to the primary general merchandise use. Establishing this off-sale license would allow the convenience of one-stop shopping for food, beer, wine, and spirits. The South Lake Tahoe Police Department has reviewed the request and does not object to the proposed issuance of this type of license to the applicant. Upon issuance of the Type 21 Off-Sale license, ‘the Type 20 Off-Sale license will be surrendered.

SITE DESCRIPTION
The property is a developed parcel at 2358 Lake Tahoe Boulevard. The site is bordered on the east and south by Johnson Meadow conservation area and on the west by commercial services.

North, across Lake Tahoe Boulevard, is Motel 6.
214
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 2
Existing Site Factors
Parcel Size: 65,231 ft2 (estimated)
Assessor's Parcel Number 031-020-041
General Plan Land Use Designation Town Center
Planning Area Tahoe Valley Area Plan
Zoning Town Center Mixed-Use Corridor
Flood Zone 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, FEMA Panel
06017C0386F
Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Safety Zone 6
Surrounding Land Uses/Zoning
General Plan Land Use Zoning Development Status
North Town Center Mixed-use
Corridor
Developed Commercial Uses
South Conservation NA Vacant Rural Lands
West Town Center Mixed-use
Corridor
Developed Commercial Uses
East Conservation NA Vacant Rural Lands
Environmental Analysis
Staff has reviewed the Project to determine the required level of review under CEQA. The proposed Project is exempt from CEQA under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption). Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines states that an activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA only applies to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA review. Granting this PCN will expand the services at the existing grocery store but will not bring about any physical change to the environment and will not have any potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

Public Notice:

The applicant, according to the California Business and Professionals Code, Chapter 6, 23985.5(a) has notified all residences within 500 feet of the site. No notices on behalf of the City of South Lake Tahoe are required.

Financial Implications:

There is a potential for additional tax revenue generated by the sale of beer, wine, and spirits.

Policy Implications:

The Strategic Plan incorporates the concept of expanding retail opportunities as part of Economic Development. As the City has been endeavoring to “increase the top line”, it is of 215
City Council Agenda Report- April 5, 2022 Page 3
critical importance to encourage and assist private enterprise to create new economic models within the City.
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
Resolution 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council
April 5, 2022
Approving Issuance of a Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ACB) for the Issuance of a Type 21 License for the Premises at 2358 Lake Tahoe Boulevard (Grocery Outlet Inc.), APNs 031-020-030, -036 and -041

BACKGROUND
A. Pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereinafter “ABC”) is charged with the responsibility of reviewing applications and issuance of licenses for the sale and /or manufacture of alcoholic beverages in the State of California.

B. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses, excepted as provided in Section 23958.4 of said Business and Professions Code.

C. Section 23958.4 of the Business and Professions Code provides that, notwithstanding the limitations of Section 23958, ABC shall issue a license if the applicant shows that “public convenience or necessity” would be served by the issuance of such license.

D. Section 23958.4 further provides that the determination of “public convenience or necessity” shall be made by ABC with regard to certain applications and shall be made by the local governing body of the area in which the applicant premises are located with regard to certain other applications.

E. As a local governing body within the meaning of said Section 23958.4 of the Business and Profession Code, the City Council of South Lake Tahoe (hereinafter the “City Council”) has the discretion to determine when the public convenience or necessity would be served by allowing an alcohol license in an area where there is an undue concentration of licenses.

F. Under state law Section 23790 of the Business and Professions Code, ABC may not issue an alcohol license if it violates an existing zoning ordinance. 234
Resolution 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Page 2
G. The subject site is zoned mixed use and is in a designated town center which allows general merchandise use by right.

H. Eric J. Lindberg, President, and Pamela B. Burke, Secretary of Grocery Outlet Inc., has applied for a Type 21 Off-Sale General license that authorizes the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits for consumption off the premises where sold.

I. Grocery Outlet Inc. currently operates under a Type 20 Off-Sale license that authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premise where sold. The Type 20 Off-Sale license shall be surrender upon issuance of a Type 21 Off-Sale license.

J. The City has determined that the issuance of a of PCN is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). Section 15061(b)(3) is a general rule exempted applying to projects that have no possibility of having a significant impact on the environment. The determination that the public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of a Type 31 ABC license would not cause environmental impacts as there is no direct physical effect.

K. The City of South Lake Tahoe has prepared a Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity provide as Exhibit A attached hereto.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council:

1. Finds that the public convenience or necessity would be served by the proposed retail sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits at Grocery Outlet Inc., 2358 Lake Tahoe Boulevard, APNs 031-020-030, -036 and -041.

2. Authorizes and directs the Planning Manager to issue the Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe Planning Commission at a meeting on April 5, 2022, by the following vote:

Yes
No
Absent
Abstain
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
235
Resolution 2022-XX April 5, 2022 Page 3
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
236
April 5, 2022
State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
2400 Del Paso Road, Suite 155
Sacramento CA, 95834
Subject: Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity for Grocery Outlet, Inc., located at 2358 Lake Tahoe Blvd., South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150 Attention:

This letter is regarding the Grocery Outlet, Inc. application for a Type 21 Off Sale General License to sell liquor at 2358 Lake Tahoe Blvd. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), under state statute, must review and issue licenses for the sale and/or manufacture of alcoholic beverages. State law provides that ABC shall deny an application for a license if the issuance of that license would either create a law enforcement problem or result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses unless a determination is made that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of that license.

Pursuant to Section 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code, the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council must issue a letter of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) for ABC to grant Grocery Outlet, Inc. a Type 21 off-sale license due to “undue concentration” in census tract 304.02. The census tract is allowed 7 off-sale licenses, while 8 have been issued. ABC requires the City of South Lake Tahoe to make a finding of public convenience or necessity before a new alcohol license may be issued in census tract 304.02.

Grocery Outlet, Inc. at 2358 Lake Tahoe Blvd. currently has a Type 20 off sale license that will be surrendered upon issuance of the Type 21 off sale license, as to not exacerbate the undue concentration.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Anna Kashuba, Assistant Planner, at (530) 542-7405 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
John Hitchcock
Planning Manager
237

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN in accordance with California Code of Regulations, Title 4, Chapter 1, Rule 61.4.

A motion to pass a resolution to grant a Letter of Public Convenience or Necessity to Grocerey Outlet, Inc. located at 2358 Lake Tahoe Blvd. will be consiered by the City Council on April 5, 2022 at 9:00 a.m., in the City Council Chambers, 1901 Lisa Maloff Way, South Lake Tahoe Airport, to consider the following
ABC - Public Convenience or Necessity - Grocery Outlet, Inc.

Summary: Under State law, the issuance of a new alcohol retail license is prohibited in any area that has an undue concentration of alcohol outlets or high crime unless a determination is made that the license would serve public convenience or necessity. (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 23958.4). The determination of “public convenience or necessity” is either made by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), or by a local governing body, depending on the license type.

Where the ABC license type necessitates a determination of public convenience or necessity by the local governing body, the local governing body must issue a letter to ABC stating that it has made the finding of public convenience or necessity for ABC to issue a new alcohol retail license. (Anna Kashuba, [email protected]).

All interested persons are invited to attend and speak on the projects or may write their comments to the City Planning Division. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(b)(2), if you challenge the application in court, you may be limited to raising only those items you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Planning Division at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. Any written correspondences should be directed to the South Lake Tahoe Development Services Department, 1052 Tata Lane, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. Staff reports will be available three days prior to the hearing and can be downloaded from the City of South Lake Tahoe website (https://www.cityofslt.us/84/Watch-City-CouncilCommission-Meetings). For any questions, please contact the Planning Division at (530) 542-6010 or the staff planner listed above.
238
Subject Parcel:
2358 Lake Tahoe Blvd
239
City of South Lake Tahoe
Agenda Item Executive Summary
Joe Irvin, City Manager
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Agenda Item #: 12
Agenda Item: Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Assessment Executive Summary: The City Council must hold a public hearing and shall consider all protests from business owners within the Ski Run Business Improvement District, received either in writing and submitted to the City Clerk prior to the Public Hearing or presented orally at the Public Hearing. If a majority of businesses (based on their BID assessment) do not provide written protests, the Council may adopt a new Resolution confirming the report as originally filed or as changed. This will allow the Finance department to include the BID assessments with the annual business license renewal billing beginning in May for the 2022/2023 business tax year.

Requested Action / Suggested Motions: Pass a Resolution confirming the Ski Run Business Improvement District annual report and levying the assessment for business license year 2022/2023.

Responsible Staff Member: Ben Hannah, Accountant II
Responsible Staff Member: Ben Hannah, Accountant II (530) 542-6079 Reviewed and Approved By:

Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
Olga Tikhomirova, Finance Director
Heather Stroud, City Attorney
Attachments:
01-Staff Report - Ski Run BID.docx
02-Resolution - Ski Run BID.docx
03-BID Board Report to City (Exh. A to Reso.)
04-SRBID 2022-2023 Budget Proposal.pdf
05-SRBID 2022-2023 Budget Proposal_Prior Year vs Proposed.pdf 06-SRBID 2022-2023 Budget Proposal_Includes Measure S Recreation.pdf 07-Tribune Notice Copy 03.04.2022.pdf
08-SRBID Members 2022.xls
09-Resolution 2002-71 SRBID Formation.pdf
240
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
City of South Lake Tahoe
Report to City Council
Meeting Date: April 5, 2022
Title: Ski Run Business Improvement District to Levy Assessment for Business License Year 2022/2023
Location: Ski Run Blvd
Responsible Staff Member: Ben Hannah, Accountant II (530) 542-6079 Background: On November 19, 2002, City Council formed the Ski Run Business Improvement District (SRBID) by adopting Resolution No. 2002-71. The Ski Run BID was formed under the Parking and Business Improvement Area Law of 1989, which is codified at California Streets & Highways Code 36500-36551. This Staff Report has been composed in accordance with Streets & Highways Code 36533 to satisfy the annual requirements for the Ski Run BID.

Issue and Discussion: This item completes the second step of the two step process listed below as required by Streets & Highways Code section 36535. Step 1, required by Streets & Highways Code sections 36533-36534, was completed on March 1st, 2022 and a public hearing was scheduled for April 5th, 2022.

Step 1: Every year the Ski Run BID Advisory Board is required to submit an Annual Report and proposed budget for approval to the City Council (City Ordinance No. 927, Section 2.9). The Council then adopts a “Resolution of Intention”, which indicates the Council’s intention to levy an assessment to the BID members and sets a time and place of a future Public Hearing whereby members of the BID can provide written protests on the content of the Report for the upcoming fiscal year.

Step 2: The City Council must hold a public hearing and shall consider all protests from business owners within the Ski Run Business Improvement District, received either in writing and submitted to the City Clerk prior to the Public Hearing or presented orally at the Public Hearing. If a majority of businesses (based on their BID assessment) do not provide written protests, the Council may adopt a new Resolution confirming the report as originally filed or as changed. This will allow the Finance department to include the BID assessments with the annual business license renewal billing beginning in May for the 2022/2023 business tax year.

Annual Assessments:

1. There are no changes to the boundaries or areas of benefit in the area.

2. The method of assessment for 2022/2023 remains the same as in previous years and is as follows:
a. 25% of the annual Business and Professions Tax and, if applicable 241
Council Agenda Report April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2
b. $2.00 per lineal foot of property frontage on Ski Run Blvd, if the property is owned by a business license holder.

Revenues: The Ski Run BID receives operating revenues from the annual assessments estimated to be $11,700 for business license year 2022/2023 which equals the projection for the previous year 2021/2022. Actual business license year 2021/2022 revenues were nearly equal to projections. The projections assume that the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic as well as the Caldor fire will continue to limit growth in the coming year.

Expenses: BID assessments will continue to be used for the allowable expenses of landscape maintenance which includes lawn care, water, and electricity. The City Public Works Department performs lawn care maintenance for six months beginning May 1st and ending October 31st.

Activities include sprinkler repair, aerating, fertilizing, mowing, clean-up, and debris removal.

Historically, the assessments have not been adequate to fully cover these costs, which would be the case for year 2022/2023 as well.

The proposed budget is based on last year’s actual revenues and expenses. It reflects a projected shortfall of $13,900 compared to $12,400 in the prior year not including the previously approved General Fund subsidy.

Financial Implications: The proposed 2022/2023 Ski Run Landscaping (fund 280) Funding Plan is attached and will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2022/2023 City budget. The plan includes the BID assessment funded portion for landscaping and maintenance and the City General fund portion from the Parks Department for landscaping and maintenance.

For fiscal year 2022/2023, staff recommends budgeting $13,900 to be transferred in from the General Fund in order to reflect a true cost and achieve a balanced budget for the Ski Run Business Improvement District.

The continued use of VueWorks by Public Works staff to segregate actual maintenance costs has led to a more accurate picture for cost recovery. Staff recommends that an evaluation be performed when the Covid-19 pandemic has run its course and business has returned to normal to determine a course of action toward total cost recovery from businesses within the district.

Environmental Considerations: None
Policy Implications: None
242
Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 1 of 2
Resolution 2022-XXX
Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe
City Council
April 5, 2022
Confirming the Ski Run Business Improvement District Annual Report and Levying the Assessment Referred to in the Report for Business License Year 2022-2023

BACKGROUND
A. On March 1, 2022 the South Lake Tahoe City Council adopted a resolution of Intent to Levy assessments within the Ski Run Business Improvement District as required by California Streets & Highways code sections 36533-36534.

B. On April 5, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing as required by California Streets & Highways code section 36525 where they considered evidence and testimony submitted at that public hearing.

C. The City Council did not receive written or oral protests against the levy of assessments submitted by payers of more than fifty percent (50%) of the total assessments of the entire district. Therefore, the City Council has determined that action is necessary and appropriate to ensure continuation of the district.

BASED ON THE FACTS SET FORTH IN THE BACKGROUND, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of South Lake Tahoe:

1. Finds that the recitals set forth herein are true and correct.

2. Confirms the report submitted by the Ski Run BID advisory board as originally filed. A true and correct copy of that report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

3. Adopts the 2022-2023 budget submitted by the Ski Run BID Advisory Board as originally filed on March 1, 2022

4. Declares that the adoption of this resolution shall constitute the levy of the Ski Run BID assessments at the rates specified in the report for the fiscal year specified in the report.

5. Declares that this Resolution is effective on its adoption.

Adopted by the City of South Lake Tahoe City Council on April 5, 2022 by the following vote:

Yes:

No:

Absent:

Abstain:
243
Resolution 2022-XXX April 5, 2022 Page 2 of 2
________________________ Date:_________
Devin Middlebrook, Mayor
Attest:
________________________
Susan Blankenship, City Clerk
The presence of electronic signature certifies that the foregoing is a true and correct copy as approved by the South Lake Tahoe City Council.
244
February 10, 2022
Ben Hannah
Accountant II
City of South Lake Tahoe
Subject: 2022 Ski Run BID Board Report
Dear Mr. Hannah
Update and Report on Accomplishments
Ski Run Business Improvement District (BID) members weathered another unprecedented pandemic year along with the rest of our south shore community and businesses along the Sierra Nevada. This led to many cancelled events, a few that persevered, and many that we are excited for in 2022.

Farmers Market Returns!
The Friday Ski Run Farmers Market returned in 2021 under the new management of Bridjet Orr. We could not have been more happy with how Bridjet ran the Farmers Market, the selection of vendors and the overall life she brought to Ski Run. It was also just encouraging to see how the farmers market could change management and still keep moving on successfully.

Ski Run Longest Table
This year’s longest table event was sadly cancelled three times due to the Caldor Fire and snow. We look forward to coming back even bigger and better in 2022. This event will use the event area that the Farmers Market is in. Each year it hopes to get a little longer until one day a table full of South Lake Tahoe residents spans the length of Ski Run. Each year 100% of the proceeds will go to a local non-profit. For 2022, all proceeds will go to Ski Run Park.

Ski Run Park
The old vacant parcel at 1195 Ski Run, formerly owned by Safeway, is on its way to becoming a community park! Local residents purchased the parcel and are in the process of building a community park that will appeal to all ages. The park will eventually be donated to the City of South Lake Tahoe. Construction will hopefully begin in May 2022 and be completed before the end of the year. It is our hope that this project will become a model to be used on other vacant parcels in the City of South Lake Tahoe.

Regards,
Jeff Cowen, Board President
Chris McNamara, Board Vice President
Ski Run Business Improvement District
245
BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment 11,700 $
Total Revenue 11,700 $
BID Operating Expenses
Water/Sewer Utilities 7,000 $
Landscaping 16,500 $
Electricity for Timers 2,100 $
Total Expenses 25,600 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (13,900) $
Other Revenue Funding Sources
General Fund Subsidy $        13,900
Ski Run BID Fund Balance $              ‐
Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) ** $              ‐
Provided for reference only.  The above budget will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2022/2023 City budget.

BID Projected Budget FY 2022/2023
FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Total General Fund Subsidy $13,900
246
BID Operating Revenue BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment 11,700 $ BID Assessment 11,700 $
Total Revenue $ 11,700 Total Revenue $ 11,700
BID Operating Expenses BID Operating Expenses
Water/Sewer Utilities 7,000 $ Water/Sewer Utilities 7,000 $Landscaping 15,000 $ Landscaping 16,500 $ Electricity for Timers $ 2,100 Electricity for Timers $ 2,100 Total Expenses 24,100 $ Total Expenses 25,600 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (12,400) $ BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (13,900) $ Other Revenue Funding Sources Other Revenue Funding Sources General Fund Subsidy 12,400 $ General Fund Subsidy 13,900 $ Ski Run BID Fund Balance $ ‐ Ski Run BID Fund Balance $ ‐ Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ ‐ Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $ ‐Provided for reference only. Provided for reference only. The above budget will be brought back for adoption as part of the fiscal year 2022/2023 City budget.

BID Adopted Budget FY 2021/2022
Total General Fund Subsidy $12,400
BID Projected Budget FY 2022/2023
Total General Fund Subsidy $13,900
Ski Run Landscaping and Bike Trail Maintenance Funding Plan 2021/2022 Adopted Budget and 2022/2023 Projected Budget Administered and Accounted for by City
FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 247
BID Operating Revenue
BID Assessment
Total Revenue 11,700 $
BID Operating Expenses
Landscaping $          16,500
Water/Sewer Utilities $            7,000
Electricity for Timers $           2,100
Total Expenses 25,600 $
BID Net Operating Revenue (Expense) (13,900) $
Other Revenue Funding Sources
General Fund Subsidy $          13,900
Ski Run BID Fund Balance $                ‐
Net Budgeted Revenue/(Expense) $                ‐
Measure S Operating Revenue
STAR Ballot Measure (Fund 281) $         10,000
Total Revenue 10,000 $
Measure S Operating Expenses
Employee Compensation $            1,130
Technical Services $            4,800
Snow Removal $            8,800
Sand and Snow Poles $            8,625
Electricity for Lights $           5,800
Total Expenses 29,155 $
Measure S Net Operating Revenue/(Expenses) (19,155) $
Provided for reference only.

Note: Fund 281 Deficit is covered by prior year fund balance.

BID Projected Budget FY 2022‐2023
FUND 280 ‐ SKI RUN BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
FUND 281 ‐ MEASURE S RECREATION SKI RUN BIKE TRAIL
Total General Fund Subsidy $13,900
248
4CD01 Notice of Intention - Ski Run BID - Page 1 of 3
FILER

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE CITY
CLERK
[email protected]
(530) 542-6005

FILING FOR
Tahoe Daily
Tribune
Columns Wide: 3
Ad
Class:

Legals

OFFICIAL AD PROOF
This is the proof of your ad scheduled to run in Tahoe Daily Tribune on the dates indicated below. If changes are needed, please contact us prior to deadline at (530) 541-3880.

Notice ID: mbvh8iwuGTLg0DLIYWoE | Proof Updated: Mar. 01, 2022 at 03:31pm PST Notice Name: 4CD01 Notice of Intention - Ski Run BID | Publisher ID: 203514 This is not an invoice. Below is an estimated price, and it is subject to change. You will receive an invoice with the final price upon invoice creation by the publisher.
03/04/2022: Other Notice 447.26
Affidavit flat charge 4.00
Internet Flat Fee Charge 40.00
Subtotal $491.26
Tax % 0.00
Total $491.26
See Proof on Next Page
249
4 CD01NoticeofIntention-SkiRunBID-Page2of3
250
4 CD01NoticeofIntention-SkiRunBID-Page3of3
251
Sheet1
Bus IDr Business Name Owner Name Stat
010253 A NEW DAY HAIR AND NAILS WELLNESS RODRIGUEZ ERIKA A 010253 RODRIGUEZ ERIKA P
320168 ALVARADO RENTAL-1213 SKI RUN B GABRIEL ALVARADO P 312615 BART'S TAHOE APTS VERNICE ZANCO P
010254 BEAUTY BY BRI RAY BRIANA IRINE P
010254 RAY BRIANA IRINE A
004542 BIOSKIN TOMER TRISH P
004553 BIOSPIRIT DAY SPA TERESA BERTRAND P
012459 MICKALA HOYT CORPORATION A
009445 BLACK BEAR LODGE LAKE TAHOE LLC BLACK BEAR LODGE LAKE TAHOE LLC P 010289 BLESSED HANDS BARBERSHOP GIANQUENTO JOEY P
316897 CAFE FIORE NICK ASHMORE P
009368 CHRISTINA LANE COSMETOLOGY LANE CHRISTINA P
320431 CLAY, V DAVIS - MASSAGE THERAP V DAVIS CLAY P
011069 CUTLOOSE HAIR SALON WALLACE JON P
010256 DEERFIELD LODGE AT HEAVENLY OAKLEY INVESTMENTS LLC P 011185 DYANI INK GIANQUENTO DYANI P
003190 ELITE EVALUATIONS MEDICAL GROUP ELITE EVALUATIONS MEDICAL GROUP P 010160 FOREST INVESTMENTS LLC FOREST INVESTMENTS LLC P
011748 FREE BIRD CHAI LLC FREE BIRD CHAI LLC P
315591 GOODFELLA'S PIZZA MCCARTHY ENTERPRISES LLC P
009988 GREATER SIERRA INSURANCE SERVICES CORTES INSURANCE AGENCY INC P 319198 HIGH SIERRA DENTAL CARE MIREYA ORTEGA P
012165 HORIZON TAHOE HOLDINGS LLC HORIZON TAHOE HOLDINGS LLC P 208074 HUGGINS RENTALS DONALD C HUGGINS P
011604 LA BARBERIA BARBER-SALON SERVICES MARTINEZ JOSE DE JESUS P 003986 LAKE TAHOE COMPUTERS LLC LAKE TAHOE COMPUTERS LLC P 010629 LAS AMIGAS ROMERO RAMONA R P
212056 LAUB & LAUB, LAW OFFICES OF JOE LAUB P
311854 LONDON, LORI G. - ATTORNEY LONDON, LORI G. - ATTORNEY P 003296 MCCARTHY BUILDING THE EDWARD J MCCARTHY TRUST OF 1993 P 008375 MICHAEL L DUPREE CPA DUPREE MICHAEL L P
009331 NOVUS SELECT NOVUS SELECT P
008859 OGL SERVICES LLC OGL SERVICES LLC P
011100 OLYMPIC BOOTWORKS EDWIN EUGENE BROWN II A
011100 EDWIN EUGENE BROWN II A
003032 PARK APTS - 1177 SKI RUN BLVD PARK JOHN R P
003033 PARK APTS - 1181 SKI RUN BLVD PARK JOHN R P
003509 POWDER HOUSE EXPRESS POWDER HOUSE CORPORATION P
003605 RED HUT COMPANY, LLC GARDNER RICHARD K P
003633 GARDNER, RICHARD K P
220277 RGG ENTERPRISES LLLP RGG ENTERPRISES LLLP P
012207 RIP N WILLIES RIP N WILLIES P

Page 1 ends

South Lake Tahoe City CouncilApril 5, 2022

South Lake Tahoe City Council
April 5, 2022