Agenda — Stanton City Council, July 9, 2024 (part 2 of 4)

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) No. 012-23010767-CV Public Works & Engineering Department
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
(714) 379-9222 | StantonCA.gov
Approved for Advertising:
______________________
Public Works Director/City Engineer
[email protected]
(714) 890-4203
Issue Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Deadline for Questions: Tuesday, April 9, 2024
Proposal Due Date: Thursday, April 18, 2024, at 4:00 p.m.

Presentation/Interviews: TBD (as necessary)

Page 2 of 38 ends

SECTION I. GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND INTRODUCTION………………………………………………3 SECTION II. PROJECT BACKGROUND………………………………………………………………………………………. 3 SECTION III. SCOPE OF SERVICES……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4 SECTION IV. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS……………………………………………………………………………. 8 SECTION V. SELECTION CRITERIA……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 10 SECTION VI. SELECTION PROCESS………………………………………………………………………………………………11 SECTION VII. SUBMISSION DEADLINE………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 SECTION VIII. REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION…………………………………………… 13 SECTION IX. TAXES AND LICENSES……………………………………………………………………………………………...13 SECTION X. PAYMENT TO CONSULTANT………………………………………………………………………………….. 13 SECTION XI. INSURANCE…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 14 SECTION XII. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF THE CITY………………………………………15 SECTION XIII. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR…………………………………………………………………………. 16 SECTION XIV. CONTRACT………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 16 SECTION XV. GENERAL CONDITIONS…………………………………………………………………………………………16 SECTION XVI. PREVAILING WAGE………………………………………………………………………………………………… 17 EXHIBIT A: VICINITY MAP
EXHIBIT B: AS-BUILT PLANS
EXHIBIT C: HVAC UNITS SPECIFICATIONS
EXHIBIT D: PROPOSAL ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM
EXHIBIT E: SAMPLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

Page 3 of 38 ends

The City of Stanton (“City”) is requesting proposals from qualified consultants to provide Engineering and Design Services for the replacement of HVAC system for the Community Center Improvements Project (Project) located at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680. The design will be funded by U.S.

Housing and Urban Development (HUD) received from the County of Orange.

Proposals must conform to the requirements of this Request for Proposal (RFP) and proposals must be submitted in a sealed envelope to the Department of Public Works and Engineering no later than 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 18, 2024. The consultant contract is anticipated to be awarded at a May City Council meeting. The City reserves the right to waive any irregularity in any proposal, or to reject any proposal that does not comply with this RFP. The city alone, using the criteria determined by the city, will select the qualified candidate.

The successful Consultant will be required to enter into an agreement with the city, which will include the requirements of this RFP, as well as other requirements to be specified at a later date. By submitting a proposal, the Consultant agrees to all of the terms of this RFP.

Please direct any questions by the deadline for questions listed on the cover page of this RFP to Elias Garcia, Assistant City Engineer via email at [email protected].

New HVAC units will bolster the City’s ability to deliver essential services to the public during emergencies, including pandemics such as COVID-19. Public facilities, such as the Stanton Community Center, play critical roles in providing shelter, electricity, internet access and other services to the public during emergencies.

On May 23, 2023, the City Council authorize a purchase order for eight (8) HVAC units from Russell Sigler, Inc. in the amount of $133,116 for the Project. The HVAC units are anticipated to arrive late March 2024.

Page 4 of 38 ends

The design of the Project will require extensive coordination with city staff from various departments, but mainly the Public Works Department and Building Division.

HVAC System Replacement – Conduct a site inspection/analysis of the work site and existing equipment, develop design plans, including but not limited to replacement of existing HVAC units with new City furnished HVAC units, upsize necessary air ducts, upsizing of existing gas connection lines, installation of curb adaptors, roofing/framing improvements, obtain all required permits from applicable agencies and permits for construction and operation, confirmation of Cal Green compliance requirements.

The City desires to have Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (“PS&E”), a complete bid package and procurement of necessary permits for the project.

The City will furnish the boiler plate specifications. Plans shall include but not limited to, plan and profile views, plans for structural, MEP and civil improvements. Final plans shall be scaled and in reproducible sheets. The selected consultant shall conduct all engineering and administrative tasks necessary to complete the project.

Project tasks shall include, but are not necessarily limited to, those items noted below. If the consultant feels that additional tasks are warranted, they must be clearly identified in the consultant’s proposal.

The development of the design for the Project requires the following objectives:
• Project kick-off meeting.
o In-person meeting with City staff to discuss all aspects of the project including project timeframe, design alternatives, budget, construction alternatives, deliverables, and expectations. Conduct site visits to review existing site conditions.
• Permitting
o Consultant shall coordinate and assist the City to obtain a building permit from the City of Stanton. The Consultant shall verify that work complies with permitting agency requirements for design and construction unhindered.

Page 5 of 38 ends

o The Consultant’s design shall include all disciplines needed for a complete design of the three priorities and shall include but not limited to mechanical, electrical, structural. In addition an air balance report and structural calculations. Develop construction drawings, submit and obtain approval from the City’s Planning & Building Division. This task also includes responding to comments by the City’s Planning & Building Division to obtain final approval.
• Survey
o Consultant shall perform the required surveying scope for this project.
• Existing HVAC System Assessment
o The Consultant shall conduct a thorough assessment of the existing HVAC system for the purpose of identifying system deficiencies and recommending solutions. The assessment should determine whether or not the existing HVAC system provides adequate cooling, heating, air movement and
temperature control, and thermal comfort in accordance with California state building ventilation requirements, Title 24, ASHRAE, ADA and all other applicable codes and regulations.

Troubleshooting the system for deficiencies will be arranged with Public Works Department staff to minimize disruption to City Hall staff. The identification of HVAC system deficiencies shall be comprehensive in nature and should consider, at a minimum:
current system performance, maintenance requirements
(including a review of records of past attempts to improve the system), operations efficiency (including costs of operation), remaining system operational life, inadequate design, and any other deficiencies observed. The Assessment findings will be written in a draft report and submitted to the Public Works Director at a monthly progress meeting for discussion and comment. Two (2) copies will be provided to the director and it will also be made available in electronic form (Microsoft Word).

Comments will be incorporated and the final Assessment
findings will be presented to the City, as two (2) final copies and in Word electronic format as well. Upon acceptance by the Public Works Director, approval will be given to begin the following task. • Proposed HVAC System Improvements Recommendations
o The Consultant shall prepare a report outlining
recommendations for HVAC system improvements, including modifying the existing equipment as an option. List the proposed

Page 6 of 38 ends

system and cost estimates (design, installation and Operation and Maintenance costs). The proposed solutions shall be based on the consultant’s professional expertise and experience and shall take into consideration numerous factors including existing HVAC performance, installation cost, operational and
maintenance costs, efficiency, system operational life, and input from City staff. The Recommendations Report findings will be written in a draft report and submitted to the Public Works Director at a monthly progress meeting for discussion and comment. Two (2) copies will be provided to the director and it will also be made available in electronic form (Microsoft Word).

Comments will be incorporated and the final Recommendation Report will be presented to the City, as two (2) final copies and in Word electronic format as well. The final report will be wet stamped and signed by a professional Mechanical Engineer licensed in the State of California.
• Final Plans, Specifications and Estimates (PS&E)
Upon review of the recommendations report as described in the previous task, the Public Works Director shall provide approval to proceed with this task. This task shall include comprehensive engineering/HVAC design services for the development all necessary bidding documents including plans, specifications and estimates (PS&E) to be used for the construction of the improvements and should therefore be complete in detail and contain all necessary information.

Drawings shall conform to standard professional practice and applicable rules, codes and regulations (local, state and federal).

The City intends to bid this part of the scope out for construction, therefore the proposal must include services related to the bidding phase (i.e. response to RFIs). After final approval by the Building Division, three (3) complete sets of bidding documents shall be provided and one final approved set in an electronic format. o Plans
▪ The Consultant shall submit PDF plans, specifications and cost estimate to the City for each status check, including all pertinent electronic files, as requested by City staff. Plans shall be submitted at 30%, 60%, 90% for City review and concurrence.
o Specifications
▪ Consultant shall prepare the project specifications, bid form, general and special provisions, and technical

Page 7 of 38 ends

specifications for project. This information shall be
organized in a format that can accommodate items being
added or deleted. These documents are to be submitted
with the 60% and 90% Plan submittal. Minor corrections
may need to be included when the final 100% Bid Set of
Plans are promulgated.
o Cost Estimate
▪ The engineer’s estimate for construction costs shall be based on local unit costs. Estimates shall be organized in a line-item format so that non-essential items can be added or deleted depending on available funding. Engineering
estimates are to be submitted with the 30% and 90% plan submittals.

QA/QC shall be performed for each deliverable. The consultant shall refrain from submitting incomplete work and from submitting irrelevant information on the plans, specifications, and cost estimates.

Submittals are deemed complete only after review and acceptance is provided by the City. The 100% PS&E submittal is the 90% submittal documents with all compliance comments resolved, all others dispositioned as necessary, and documents approved and issued for acceptance by the City.
• Construction Support
o The Consultant shall provide support with project equipment submittals, clarifications with design, review submittals for change orders, prepare record drawings, and approval of work assignments during construction of the project. The Consultant shall provide responses within two (2) working days of receiving a notices to avoid delaying construction efforts. The Consultant will be expected to attend the pre-construction meeting,
construction field progress meetings (three (3) meetings minimum) and the post-construction meeting. A separate
optional fee should be included with the proposal for this task.

Deliverable Expected Completion from Kick-off Meeting
Existing HVAC System Assessment Week 4
Proposed HVAC System Improvements Week 8
Permitting Weeks 8-16
PS&E Weeks 8-20

Page 8 of 38 ends

Advertise for Construction Week 24
Construction Support TBD
Consultant is encouraged to identify any additional work that is not specified in this Scope of Work that would be, in its opinion, necessary to complete the project as defined herein. Consultant may propose additional services that in its opinion will improve the efficiency and quality of the project. If identified, the additional work or services must be included in the proposal but separated out as an additional task in the Consultant’s Fee Schedule.

Proposals and all other information and documents submitted in response to this RFP are subject to the California Public Records Act, which generally mandates the disclosure of documents in the possession of the City upon the request of any person, unless the content of the document falls within a specific exemption category.

Three (3) copies of the Proposal and one (1) copy of the Fee Proposal must be submitted containing the following elements:
• Proposers must submit three (3) bound copies of their proposal to the City for review.
• 8‐1/2" x 11" sheet sizes should be used for the text, with 11" x 17" sheet sizes for any fold‐out drawings.
• The proposal shall be limited to thirty-five (35) pages, double-sided.

Resumes for proposed personnel will not be counted towards the page limit. Otherwise all other sheets apply.
• Proposals should be as concise as possible and specific to this project.

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
A Letter of Transmittal shall be addressed to Cesar Rangel, Director of Public Works/City Engineer, and, at a minimum, must contain the following information:
• Identification of the proposing Consultant who will have contractual responsibility with the City. Identification shall include the legal name of the company, corporate address, telephone number, and email address of the contact person identified during the period of proposal evaluation.

Page 9 of 38 ends

• A statement representing that the Consultant has thoroughly examined and become familiar with the work required in this RFP and is capable of performing quality work to achieve the objectives of the City. • Acknowledgement of receipt of all addenda, if any.
• A statement to the effect that the proposal shall remain valid for a period of not less than ninety (90) days from the date of submittal. • Signature of the official authorized to bind Consultant to the terms of the proposal.
• Signed statement attesting that all information submitted with the proposal is true and correct.

WRITTEN PROPOSAL
The Proposal shall consist of the following sections:

1. Letter of Transmittal. Contents of the Letter of Transmittal listed above.

2. Firm Structure and History. Including the firm’s experience managing projects similar in magnitude and scope, structure (organization chart), credentials, background, and ownership of the firm. Include the firm’s previous experience with Federal Funded Grant projects.

3. Key personnel. List qualifications of personnel with resumes and a breakdown of responsibilities. The Firm’s project manager, who will be responsible for planning, coordinating, and conducting the majority of the work, must be identified and committed to the project. The City must approve changes to key personnel committed to work on the project subsequent to award of contract. Resumes must be submitted for key personnel who will be assigned to this project.

4. A narrative briefly describing the proposed approach using general descriptions for the activities.

5. A list of proposed sub-consultants, sub-contractors, suppliers, and manufacturers, including their qualifications pertinent to this project.

6. A client reference list from previous City / Government Agency projects of similar scope and magnitude. List should include key personnel-contacts and their position with the agency.

7. A schedule indicating proposed time and duration for completion of project.

8. Evidence of compliance with City insurance requirements.

9. Exceptions and Deviations. Contractor shall state any exceptions or deviations from the requirements of this RFP, segregating “technical” exceptions from “contractual” exceptions. Where the Consultant wishes to

Page 10 of 38 ends

propose alternative approaches to meeting the City’s technical or contractual requirements, these shall be thoroughly explained. If no contractual exceptions are noted, Consultant will be deemed to have no objection to the contract requirements as set forth in EXHIBIT E, “Sample Professional Services Agreement.”

10. Proposal Acknowledgement Form. Contractor shall complete and submit EXHIBIT D, “Proposal Acknowledgement Form.” Failure to submit this signed form will result in the disqualification of the Consultant’s proposal.

SEPARATE FEE PROPOSAL
Consultant fee schedule included with the submittal but in a separate sealed envelope. The proposal shall include:
a. Total Project Cost Proposal and hourly rate schedule. b. A table indicating the anticipated staff-hours dedicated to perform each of the tasks to complete the project.

Additional information can be found under Section X, “Payment to Consultant,” below.

Submitted proposals will be evaluated based on the following factors, but may not be limited to just these factors:

Criteria Approximate
Weight
Staffing Capabilities / Technical Competence. Candidates shall have knowledge of the principles and practices of engineering as related to design, construction and
maintenance of public facilities, as well as an understanding of the practices, applicable laws and state permits; codes and standards applicable to public works construction.
15%
Approach to Work. Methodology to be implemented to
address and coordinate the various elements within the
program.
35%
Past Performance Record. Experience in completion of
projects of similar complexity and scale for other municipal agencies within Southern California is desirable. Efficiency and timeliness in completion of project.
35%

Page 11 of 38 ends

Cost. Reasonableness of the firm’s fixed price and or hourly rates, and competitiveness of quoted firm-fixed prices with other proposals received.
10%
Exceptions and deviations from the City’s standard
Professional Services Agreement. 5%
Per California law, the procurement of Professional Services must be selected on the basis of qualifications, or Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) in accordance with Public Law 92-582. The procurement of Professional Services can be one-time or multi-year. Professional services contracts have provisions for specific terms, compensation amounts, and scopes of services.

The City reserves the right to require in-person interviews with Consultants, if deemed necessary, after the evaluation of the written proposals. In this case, the Consultants of the three (3) highest-scoring written proposals will be invited to interviews prior to final selection of the Consultant.

Each RFP will be reviewed to determine if it meets the submittal requirements contained within this RFP. Failure to meet the requirements for the RFP will be cause for rejection of the proposal. The city may reject any proposal if it is conditional, incomplete, or contains irregularities. The City may waive an immaterial deviation in a proposal, but this shall in no way modify the proposal document or excuse the Consultant from compliance with the contract requirements if the Consultant is awarded the contract.

The successful Consultant to whom work is awarded shall, within ten (10) days after being notified, enter into a contract with the City for the work in accordance with the specifications and shall furnish all required documents necessary to enter into said contract. Failure of the successful bidder to execute the contract within the ten (10)-day window shall be just cause for the City to contract with the next responsible Consultant.

Page 12 of 38 ends

In order to be considered, the Consultant must submit three (3) copies of the Service Proposal, and one (1) copy of the Fee Proposal in a separate, sealed envelope to the following office:

City of Stanton – City Hall
Public Works & Engineering Department (Public Counter)
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680-3162
Attention: Elias Garcia, P.E., T.E.

The proposal outer envelope shall be labeled:

PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN OF THE

HVAC REPLACEMENT OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS

PROJECT
The proposal must be received at the department listed above no later than the date and time listed on the cover. The City is not responsible for proposals submitted to the incorrect department.

There is no expressed or implied obligation for the City to reimburse firms for any expenses incurred in preparing proposals in response to this request.

Materials submitted by respondents are subject to public inspection under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sec. 6250 et seq.). Any language purporting to render the entire proposal confidential or proprietary will be ineffective and disregarded.

The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted, and to use any idea in a proposal, regardless of whether the proposal was selected.

Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the firm of the conditions contained in the RFP, unless clearly and specifically noted in the proposal submitted and confirmed in the contract between the City and the selected firm.

All property rights, including publication rights of all reports produced by the selected firm in connection with services performed under this agreement, shall be vested in the City.

Page 13 of 38 ends

All questions and/or inquiries regarding this RFP shall be directed to:

Elias Garcia, P.E., T.E.

Assistant City Engineer
City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680-3162
Email: [email protected]
All questions and/or inquiries shall be submitted by Tuesday, April 9, 2024. If the City chooses to respond to such inquiries, written responses will be made available through the City’s bidding support platform, bidnet direct (https://www.stantonca.gov/departments/public_works___engineering/reque st_for_proposals_and_bids/) by Monday, April 15, 2024.

Consultants are responsible to verify receipt of any addenda issued. We are aware some of our e-mails go to “junk”. If you do not receive any addenda by Monday, April 15, 2024, please verify any addenda was issued by contacting Elias Garcia by e-mail. Confirmation of receipt of all addenda is part of the Proposal Acknowledgement Form (EXHIBIT D).

All taxes and licenses, including, but not limited to, a Stanton City Business License and appropriate Contractor’s license, required for this work shall be obtained at the sole expense of the Contractor.

This work is to be performed for a “Not-to-Exceed Fixed Fee.” The Consultant shall provide a “Payment Schedule” indicating the fee for individual tasks with a “Not-to-Exceed Fixed Fee” which shall be the sum of all tasks.

Tasks shall include, but not be limited to, all Professional Consultant Services necessary to complete the work covered by this Proposal.

Page 14 of 38 ends

The City will pay the Consultant for work completed as identified in the Payment Schedule.

Progress payments shall be based on tasks performed as identified in the Payment Schedule. Monthly invoices will specifically identify job title, personhours, and costs incurred by each task.

Sub-categorization of task is permitted to better define the task for payment.

Reimbursement costs such as mileage, printing, telephone, photographs, postage and delivery, are to be included in the “Not-to-Exceed Fixed Fee.” All tasks including labor and reimbursable costs such as mileage, printing, telephone, photographs, postage, and delivery shall be supporting documentation presented at the time payment is requested.

The City will pay the Consultant for all acceptable services rendered in accordance with the “Agreement for Professional Consultant Services.”

When the Consultant is performing, or is requested to perform, work beyond the scope of service in the “Agreement for Professional Consultant Services,” an amendment to the agreement will be executed between the City and Consultant.

Payment will be based on hourly rate for work completed associated with each applicable task as identified in the consultant’s proposal.

A. The Consultant shall have Commercial General Liability insurance which affords coverage at least as broad as Insurance Services Office “occurrence” form CG 0001, with minimum limits of at least $1,000,000 per occurrence, and if written with an aggregate, the aggregate shall be double the per occurrence limit. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.

B. The Contractor shall have Automobile Insurance for owned and nonowned automotive equipment in the amount of not less than $1,000,000.

Page 15 of 38 ends

C. The selected firm shall furnish the City a certificate evidencing Workmen’s Compensation Insurance with limits of no less than $1,000,000 per accident and Comprehensive Professional Liability with limits no less than $2.000,000 per occurrence. The City shall be named as the Additional Insured. Certificates of Insurance must be accompanied by the applicable endorsements for the specific insurance policy.

D. A Certificate of Insurance or an appropriate binder shall bear an endorsement containing the following provisions:
“Solely as respect to services done by or on behalf of the named insured for the City of Stanton, it is agreed that the City of Stanton, the Successor Agency of the City of Stanton, its officers, employees, and agents are all included as additional insured under this general liability policy, and the coverage(s) provided shall be primary insurance and not contributing with any other insurance available to the City of Stanton, its officers and employees, and its agents, under any third-party liability policy.”
E. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to ensure that all sub-consultants comply with the following:

Each sub-consultant that encroaches within the City’s right-ofway and affects (i.e., damages or impacts) City infrastructure must comply with the liability insurance requirements of the City.

Examples of such sub-consultant work include soil sample borings, utility potholing, etc.

The City reserves the right to terminate the “Professional Services Agreement” for the “convenience of the City” at any time by giving ten (10) days written notice to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. All finished or unfinished drawings, maps, documents, field notes, and other materials produced and procured by the Consultant under the said aforementioned Agreement is, at the option of the City, City property and shall be delivered to the City by the Consultant within ten (10) working days from the date of such termination. The City will reimburse the Consultant for all acceptable work performed as set forth in the executed Agreement.

Page 16 of 38 ends

The Contractor’s relationship to the City in the performance of the Contractor’s services for this project is that of an independent contractor. The personnel performing said services shall at all times be under the Contractor’s exclusive direction and control and shall be employees of the Contractor, not employees of the City. The Contractor shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due its employees in connection with the performance of said work, and shall be responsible for all employee reports and obligations, including, but not limited to, Social Security, income tax withholding, unemployment compensation, and Workers’ Compensation.

The Contract includes the Professional Services Agreement, the City’s RFP, the Contractor’s Proposal, and Exhibits.

The Political Reform Act and the City’s Conflict of Interest Code require that consultants be considered as potential filers of Statements of Economic Interest. Consultants, as defined by Section 18701, may be required to file an Economic Interest Statement (Form 700) within thirty (30) days of signing a Consultant Agreement with the City, on an annual basis thereafter while the contract remains in effect, and within thirty (30) days of completion of the contract.

Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by the Consultant in: (1) preparing the proposal; (2) submitting the proposal to the City; (3) presenting during the selection interview; (4) negotiating with the City on any matter related to the proposal; (5) any other expenses incurred by the Consultant prior to an executed Agreement, and (6) attendance of City Council for Award of Contract.

The City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by the Contractor. Services shall not commence until the Agreement for Professional Contractor Services has been executed by the City.

The Contractor is responsible for notifying Underground Service Alert and providing proper traffic control, at no additional expense to the City.

Page 17 of 38 ends

The City reserves the right to withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any Agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone reviewing the proposals for its own convenience and to reject any and all proposals responding to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s). Any contract awarded for these Contractor engagements will be made to the Contractor who, in the opinion of the City, is best qualified.

Certain labor categories under this project are subject to prevailing wages as identified in the State of California Labor Code commencing in Section 1770 et. seq. These labor categories when employed for any work on or in the execution of a “Public Works” project require payment of prevailing wages including but not limited to, testing, potholing and non-design work.

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

ENGINEERING AND DESIGN SERVICES FOR HVAC REPLACEMENT OF THE

COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
SUBMITTED BY:

Due Date: April 30, 2024 2024-599PBS
PBS ENGINEERS 2

1. Letter of transmittal April 30, 2024
Cesar Rangel
City of Stanton – City Hall
Public Works & Engineering Department (Public Counter)
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680-3162
Project: Engineering and Design Services for HVAC Replacement of the Community Center Improvements Project Dear Mr. Rangel,
PBS Engineers, Inc. (PBS), is pleased to submit our Statement of Qualifications for your consideration in response to your RFP-0222. PBS is pleased to provide professional services and enter a contract with the City of Inglewood under the terms and conditions described in the Sample Agreement of RFP-0222. PBS fully understands and complies to all elements of RFP-0222.

Contact Person: Norman Patel, Senior Mechanical Project Engineer | Senior Associate Contact: (626) 650-0350 | [email protected]
Corporate Address: 2100 E Route 66, Glendora, CA 91740
PBS is a full-service mechanical, electrical, plumbing and technology (MEP+T) consulting firm with an international staff of over one hundred (100), all committed to providing innovative solutions and personalized engineering services for your project, certified SBE/MBE/DBE.

PBS offers a variety of engineering services ranging from the design of mechanical, electrical, plumbing, fire protection and telecommunication systems to the study and implementation of cogeneration, thermal energy storage, and photovoltaic, air conditioning and daylighting systems. As the result of a rich and diverse history, the firm’s capabilities include engineering for municipal, aviation, education, healthcare, commercial, residential and industrial facilities.

As a full-service engineering firm, we offer an experienced and cohesive team of engineers, designers, draftspersons, and CADD technicians. Our commitment is to provide quality engineering, and to ensure that projects are submitted on time and within the budget. Working in close coordination with the local and state agencies, PBS provides quality work and a well-organized and executed project that meets all codes and regulations.

We believe that the following PBS capabilities would be extremely beneficial to this project: We have extensive experience with government agencies, such as: City of Inglewood, City of Cerritos, City of Poway, City of Long Beach, City of Commerce, City of San Dimas, City of Simi Valley, City of Santa Ana, City of Torrance, City of Monterey Park, County of Los Angeles, Metropolitan Water District, Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety (LADBS), Department of Veteran’s Affairs Department State Architect (DSA), Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, San Diego County Regional Airport Authority and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). Our dedication to “Providing Best Service” (PBS) at minimum cost.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide our Statement of Qualifications. We hope that the enclosed information answers all of your questions. Should you require any additional information, please call us at (626) 650-0350.

All information submitted within this proposal is true and correct.

This proposal shall remain valid for a period of no less than ninety (90) days from the date of submittal.

PBS Engineers, Inc. acknowledges addendum #1, dated April 11, 2024.

Sincerely,
PBS Engineers, Inc.

Kunal Shah, PE, RCDD, LEED AP, President | CEO
[email protected]
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS Engineers, Inc. - Statement of Qualifications
RFP-0222 Engineering and Design Services for
HVAC Replacement of the Community Center Improvements Project April 30, 2024
PBS ENGINEERS 3

2. Firm Structure and History
PBS Engineers, Inc. was incorporated in 2003 and is a
full-service mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP)
consulting firm with a staff of over one hundred (100)
professionals, all committed to providing innovative
solutions and personalized engineering services. We
are headquartered in Glendora, with offices in Los
Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, Santa Clara, and
Houston, Texas. Work for the City of Stanton will be
prepared in our headquarters in Glendora office.

The PBS Engineers mission is to “Provide WOW Through
Service.” PBS offers a wide range of engineering services that includes the design of mechanical, electrical,
plumbing, fire protection and technology integration.

The PBS Team brings a unique level of experience to
every project with its industry ranging portfolio of
work. PBS proven itself to be a leader in engineering
field by being recognized as a Top Engineering Firm
by ENR California, Consulting Specifying Engineer and
Building Design and Construction. PBS differentiates
itself through a commitment to quality design, constant communication and responsiveness to client needs.

PBS Engineers is a certified Small Business Enterprise
(SBE), Minority Business Enterprise (MBE), and
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) corporation.

When PBS was formed in 2003, the founding principals
had already worked together for many years, and it
was through their ongoing friendship and professional
association that a shared vision emerged to provide
excellence in MEP design. We are headquartered in
Glendora, with offices in Los Angeles, San Diego and
in Houston, Texas. Work for City of Stanton will be
prepared out of our headquarters in Glendora.

PBS principals are involved in every project and
every team includes an organization of Professional
Engineers, LEED Accredited Professionals, and/or
Registered Communication Distribution Designers,
depending on the requirements of the project. PBS is
known for the production of technically outstanding
documents and for document coordination between
all disciplines, with a strong Total Quality Management program and an Independent Quality Review Team.

PBS offers a variety of engineering services ranging
from the design of mechanical, electrical, plumbing,
fire protection and telecommunication systems to the
study and implementation of cogeneration, thermal
energy storage, and photovoltaic, air conditioning and
daylighting systems. As the result of a rich and diverse history, the firm’s capabilities include engineering
for municipal, aviation, education, healthcare,
commercial, residential and industrial facilities.

These relationships are in place to continue providing
services with the utmost efficiency, therefore assuring budget constraints are met. Utilizing our team of
highly qualified engineers that are supported by a
Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) system
that utilizes BIM technology, along with our broad
experience in field observation, our client is assured
of a project that will be completed in a prompt and
cost-effective manner. It is the experience acquired
through a vast array of projects, together with an
uncompromising dedication to serving clients through
superior engineering, which sets us apart.

We have a magnitude of MEP engineering experience
with various government agencies, such as, City of
Poway, City of Simi Valley, Los Angeles Department of
Building and Safety (LADBS), Los Angeles Bureau of
Street Lighting (LABSL), Department State Architect
(DSA), Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), City of
Long Beach, City of San Dimas, City of Torrance, City
of Monterey Park, San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority, John Wayne Airport, Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and Office of
Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD).

The design process starts with coordination or
interaction with the City of Stanton, knowing exactly
their needs and what they have. Field investigation or
field work will be scheduled with the City of Stanton
to gather all pertaining information needed for the asneeded work.

Our goal is “Providing Best Services” (PBS) at maximum
quality and minimal cost.

Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 4
Firm Structure and History
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
City of Cerritos, Cerritos, California
Civic Center HVAC Replacement (2021-2023)
PBS Engineers provided mechanical, electrical and plumbing design and engineering services in the planning, design, and construction drawings for the replacement of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) at the City Hall and the Council Chamber. The City Hall has two levels with a basement and is an approximately 45,000-square-foot facility. The Council Chamber is approximately 8,000 square feet. The Scope of Work involved the design of a new HVAC system at the City Hall and Council Chamber to replace the current HVAC system in operation. The existing HVAC system was almost 50 years old and in need of replacement. The overall goal of the project was to install an HVAC system that is responsive to the yearround temperature fluctuations in the City buildings.

PBS ENGINEERS 5
Firm Structure and History
City of Poway, Poway, California
City Hall - Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Equipment Assessment and System Function Analysis (2019-2020)
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS Engineers has prepared an extensive report to include Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Assessment and Functional analysis for City Hall Building (CHB) and the City Council Building (CCB), located at 13325 Civic Center Dr, Poway, California. Report comprises of detailed analysis of the existing HVAC Systems, Building Automation System, the Central Plant Equipment such as 250 Ton air cooled chiller, chilled water pumps, 2 million Btu boiler, heating hot water pumps, Air Handling Units, VAV terminal units, Fan Coil Units, Condensers, and Exhaust Fans. This report was prepared and based on the extensive survey, visual filed observations, Test and Air Balance report review, available As-built drawings study, maintenance interviews and input from users and concluded the report with fully executed summary comprising all findings and recommendation for all HVAC equipment.

PBS ENGINEERS 6
Firm Structure and History
Metropolitan Water District Headquarters Building – Los Angeles, California Comprehensive Assessment and Report for Chiller Water Plant Efficiency and Recommendations for Improvements (2017-2018)
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
The Scope of Work for this project involved performing assessment of the Three (3) existing Chillers associated Pumps and Cooling Towers performance serving the Metropolitan Water District Headquarters Building.

Prepare report to provide recommendations for improvement to the overall efficiency of the existing Chilled Water Central Plant and provide alternate options identifying their advantages and disadvantages.

PBS ENGINEERS 7
Northrop Grumman, Manhattan Beach, CA
Building O3 Interior Upgrade (2020-2022)
Firm Structure and History
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS provided MEP/FA/FP engineering services for replacement of existing HVAC originally installed in 1981 with new energy efficient HVAC system without major structural upgrade for two story building approximately 50,000 sq. ft area. Project includes replacement of large existing custom air handling units, Pneumatic to digital controls upgrade, restroom upgrade, large presentation room 230+ occupant capacity with STC 50 sound rating, brake rooms, huddle rooms, server room, computer labs. The challenge was to design the entire project from inception to completion withing 3 months including Northrop Grumman engineering facility review. PBS was able to deliver the project on time and able to get approval from AHJ with minor plan check correction.The highlight of the project is Secured HVAC system with white noise masking, Power filters for security requirements, SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) wall construction, stringent noise attenuation criteria for conference room and individual offices.

PBS ENGINEERS 8
Firm Structure and History
PBS oversaw the City Hall Poway Building Management System (BMS) controls upgrade from inception to the completion. City Hall of Poway replaced existing LONWORKS controls to BACnet compatible control. PBS reviewed controls drawings provided by selected controls contractor, organize bi weekly construction meetings, overseen BMS installation and integration with city web control server, ensured proper training has been delivered to the city maintenance crew and ensure the smooth implementation of the brand new BACnet compatible controls for all HVAC equipment such as Chiller, Boiler, Pumps, Air handling units, fan coil units and exhaust fans.

City of Poway, Poway, California
Poway City Hall, Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Controls Replacement Project (2021-2022)
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 9
Firm Structure and History
United States Postal Service, Industry Processing and Distribution Facility Center, City of Industry, CA
Mechanical Controls System Comprehensive Assessment and Report (2018-2019) Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS provided Mechanical Engineering Services assessment and report for the United States Postal Service, Industry Processing and Distribution Facility Center located at City of Industry, California, for the existing Building Automation System (BMS) Upgrade House Control Review Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, Energy Management and Building Management Systems House Controls that are currently not functioning in conformance to owner standards.

PBS ENGINEERS 10
Firm Structure and History
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
Los Angeles Unified School District, Phineas Banning Senior High School, Wilmington, CA Remove and Replace Deteriorated Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Equipment for Multipurpose Building “C” (007DOT); Shop Building No. 1 (006COG); Shop Building No. 3 (010COT), Replace Cooling Tower and Chiller at Shop Building No. 3 (010COT) (2016-2020) PBS Engineers surveyed the existing building and site and assessed the facility’s existing Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing systems. Assessment was included to 700-ton Central Plant Chiller, Cooling Tower, pumps etc.

A written report was provided on the adequacy/inadequacy of each system and provided recommendation for replacement/refurbishment of the Central Plant components. The report also included recommendations on what would be needed to bring the current building’s current systems into compliance with current code standards, as well as, what would be required to accommodate the District’s needs. A conceptual cost estimate for the Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing systems, including the site work was also provided.

PBS ENGINEERS 11
Firm Structure and History
Los Angeles Unified School District, Downtown Business Magnet High School, Los Angeles, California
Replace HVAC System (2012-2019)
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS Engineers provided an HVAC replacement for the Los Angeles Unified School District, Downtown Business Magnet High School. The project is a two-story classroom and administration building, built in 1960. The total project size was approximately 108,000 square feet. A/E Services included: assessment report of mechanical equipment and systems, basis of design and recommendation, selected equipment to comply with Title-24, high energy efficient, indoor air quality requirement, economizer as required per code, energy rebate for efficient units and demand controls from local utility company to benefit to the District. Prepared construction documents, specification for Division of State Architect (DSA) submittal and approval process included DSA-1, DSA-3 and DSA-108 required applicable forms. Bidding process phasing and construction administration as required to complete successful project. Scope of work includes to replace 140 Ton chiller, boiler, pumps and air handling units.

PBS ENGINEERS 12
Firm Structure and History
PBS provided Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Structural and Architectural/Engineering Services to replace the deteriorated air-conditioning equipment serving the Classroom Buildings and provided a make-up air system and fire suppression system (Ansul 102) for the existing Type I Kitchen Hood, complete maintenance service for roof top air conditioning units for Building 1 (Administration), Building 10 (Multipurpose) and Building AA-2445 (Classroom Building). Scope of work includes package units, fan coil units for IT server rooms and Bard units.

Los Angeles Unified School District, Apperson Elementary School, Sunland, California Replace Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Systems for (18) Classroom Buildings; (1) Administration Building; and (1) Multipurpose Building (2015 to 2019) Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 13

3. Key Personnel
Organization Chart of Personnel and Percentage of Commitment Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
Norman Patel
Senior Mechanical Project Engineer
Percent Available: 70%
Tariq Hassan, P.E.

Senior Mechanical Engineer
Percent Available: 60%
Mechanical:

Khushboo Patel, P.E., PMP, CBCP, LEED AP | Senior
Mechanical Engineer | Percent Available: 65%
Himanshu Patel, EIT, LEED AP | Senior Mechanical Design Engineer | Percent Available: 65%
Plumbing:

Ramon Camacho | Senior Plumbing & Fire Protection
Design Engineer | Percent Available: 65%
Costa and Associates
Structural Engineer
Percent Available: 70%
Steve Hseih
Cost Estimator
Percent Available: 70%
Electrical:

Kunal Shah| President, CEO |
Percent Available: 60%
Louis Perez | Senior Electrical Project Engineer |
Percent Available: 65%
R. Alberto Arango
Architect
Percent Available: 70%
PBS ENGINEERS 14
Company Personnel
Tariq Hassan, PE
Associate Principal
Principal in Charge | Project Mechanical Engineer
Contact Number: 626-650-0350
25 Years of Experience
Joined PBS Engineers, Inc. in 2007
Background
• B.S., Mechanical Engineering, California State Polytechnic University Pomona, California
• Registered Mechanical Engineer in California #33827
Selected Project Experience
• City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana, California
New Bike Station
• City of Cerritos, Cerritos, California
Civic Center HVAC Replacement
• City of Commerce, Commerce, California
New Transit and Public Works Operations and Maintenance Facility • City of Poway, City Hall – Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Equipment Assessment and System Function Analysis
• City of Poway, Poway, California
Poway City Hall, Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Replacement Project
• City of Simi Valley, California, City Hall HVAC Replacement • USPS, Industry Processing & Distribution Facility Center, City of Industry, CA Mechanical Controls System Comprehensive Assessment and Report • Northrop Grumman, Manhattan Beach, CA
Building O3 Interior HVAC Upgrade
Tariq has designed mechanical systems for numerous new
and existing facilities such as commercial, educational, healthcare, industrial and military facilities, including entertainment centers, amusement parks, computer
and data rooms, civil centers, institutional facilities and cogeneration plants. Tariq has worked as a designer, HVAC engineer, project engineer and project manager during his engineering experience, allowing him to fully understand the mechanical design process. His primary duties
include the design of HVAC, preparation of specifications and cost estimates, performance of mechanical peer
review, attendance at project meetings and project
coordination. Tariq is well-versed in the application of energy conservation measures to help design ultra-efficient facilities. He is on the cutting edge of implementing
mechanical design strategies to promote Net-Zero
operation.

Tariq’s personal business motto is,
“I will strive to exceed our Client’s expectations as well as the goals of the project.” Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 15
Company Personnel
Norman Patel
Associate Principal
Senior Mechanical Project Engineer | Senior
Associate
Contact Number: 626-650-0350
40+ Years of Experience
Joined PBS Engineers, Inc. in 2018
Background
• B.S., Mechanical Engineering, California State Polytechnic University Selected Project Experience
• City of Cerritos, Cerritos, California
Civic Center HVAC Replacement
• United States Postal Service, Los Angeles Processing and Distribution Facility Center, Los Angeles, CA
Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Assessment and Report
• LAUSD, Downtown Business Magnet High School, Los Angeles, California Replace HVAC Systems
• LAUSD, Apperson Elementary School, Sunland, California Replace Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Systems • Los Angeles Unified School District, Phineas Banning Senior High School, Wilmington, CA
Remove and Replace Deteriorated Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Equipment
• Fontana Unified School District, Live Oak Elementary School, Fontana, CA HVAC Assessment Report and Replacement
• San Dimas Unified School District, San Dimas, California Bonita High School and San Dimas High School Gymnasium HVAC Upgrades
With over forty years of experience, Norman Patel has
engineered and implemented over 10 million square feet
of innovative mechanical systems design, including: heat transfer and transport, cooling/heating load calculations, complex psychrometric studies, energy savings analysis, systems selection and comparative solutions design. In
addition, Norman is dedicated to incorporating sustainable and renewable energy concepts in all of his projects.

To accomplish the results, Norman is skilled in all facets of mechanical engineering design, feasibility studies,
construction documentation, equipment specification
and review, and construction administration. He
focuses on solutions to achieve client satisfaction
through elegantly simple, easily maintainable and
energy efficient systems, while not losing focus on
budgetary realities and interdisciplinary coordination.

Norman’s personal business motto is,
“Providing the best service to my client.”
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 16
Company Personnel
Kunal Shah, PE, RCDD, LEED AP
President | CEO
Project Electrical Engineer
Contact Number: 626-650-0350
25 Years of Experience
Joined PBS Engineers, Inc. in 2003
Background
• B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, California • Professional Electrical Engineer #E-17249 in California • Registered Communication Distribution Designer (RCDD) # 07039 • LEED AP
Selected Project Experience
• City of Cerritos, Cerritos, California
Civic Center HVAC Replacement
• City of San Dimas, California
Electrical On-Call Services
• City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana, California
New Bike Station
• City of Poway, Poway, California
City Hall – Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Equipment Assessment and System Function Analysis
• Metropolitan Water District Headquarters Building – Los Angeles, California Comprehensive Assessment and Report for Chiller Water Plant Efficiency and Recommendations for Improvements
• City of Commerce, Commerce, California
New Transit and Public Works Operations and Maintenance Facility • East Whittier City School District, Oceanview Elementary School, Whittier, CA Campus Wide Fire Alarm and HVAC Upgrade
As a Principal Electrical Engineer, Kunal has built a portfolio of award-winning work across multiple industries. Kunal can control all phases of project management from design strategy through implementation including design, budgeting, design development, construction documentation coordination
and construction administration. His attention to detail and follow through has won him a loyal client following.

As the Principal Electrical Engineer, Kunal is intimately involved in all design and project management responsibilities. He is fueled by his desire to “WOW” his clients through his commitment to service. In addition, Kunal’s role is to cultivate a positive team environment and to nurture and motivate employees to reach their potential while maintaining client satisfaction for all projects within the firm. Kunal’s philosophy is to be available to his clients whenever he is needed.

Kunal’s personal business motto is,
“I make your life easier by providing you what you need when you need it.” Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 17
Company Personnel
Louis Perez
Associate Principal
Senior Electrical Project Engineer
Contact Number: 626-650-0350
35+ Years of Experience
Joined PBS Engineers, Inc. in 2004
Background
• Electrical Engineering Certification, Mt. San Antonio College, Walnut Selected Project Experience
• City of San Dimas, California
Electrical On-Call Services
• City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana, California
New Bike Station
• South Oxnard Branch Library, Oxnard, California
Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) and Controls Upgrade • East Whittier City School District, Oceanview Elementary School, Whittier, CA Campus Wide Fire Alarm and HVAC Upgrade
• Los Angeles County Fire Department, Station No. 192, La Habra, CA Upgrade Americans with Disabilities Act Restroom/Shower Area • San Dimas Unified School District, San Dimas, California Bonita High School and San Dimas High School Gymnasium HVAC Upgrades
• Torrance Municipal Airport, Torrance California
Design Services for Emergency Operations Center (EOC)
• City of Compton - Compton Library, Compton, California Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Restroom Upgrade
• City of Riverside, Riverside, California
Public Works Department – Water Quality Control Plant Renovation

A diverse professional with over thirty-eight years
of experience, Lou Perez has designed full electrical
systems for municipal, aviation, elementary
schools through graduate universities, fire stations,
churches, hospitals and commercial facilities.

His expertise also includes feasibility and utility master planning studies, as well as systems for communication and signaling, fire alarm and detection, interior and exterior lighting design and low voltage power distribution. A superb project manager, Lou is responsible for the engineering and construction administration on many key projects.

Lou has extensive experience in feasibility and master
utility studies, electrical design and engineering, as well as construction coordination and administration. He is
fluent in working with governing agencies, including the Division of the State Architect, which provides design
and construction oversight for K–12 schools, community
colleges, and various other state-owned and leased facilities.

Lou’s personal business motto is,
“Helping you to see what is possible.”
Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 18
Company Personnel
Khushboo Patel, PE, PMP, CBCP, LEED AP
Senior Associate
Senior Mechanical Engineer
Contact Number: 626-650-0350
13 Years of Experience
Joined PBS Engineers, Inc. in 2011
Background
• M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology Baroda, Gujarat India
• Registered Mechanical Engineer in California #M38521
• Certified Building Commissioning Professional (CBCP)
• LEED AP
Selected Project Experience
• City of Poway, Poway, California
City Hall – Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Equipment Assessment and System Function Analysis
• City of Poway, Poway, California
Poway City Hall, Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Replacement Project
• City of Cerritos, Cerritos, California
Civic Center HVAC Replacement
• City of Commerce, Commerce, California
New Transit and Public Works Operations and Maintenance Facility • Northrop Grumman, Manhattan Beach, CA
Building O3 Interior HVAC Upgrade
• City of Riverside, Riverside, California
Public Works Department – Water Quality Control Plant Renovation Khushboo Patel is an HVAC mechanical engineer and has
experience in both residential and commercial projects.

She has worked on several projects including municipal, aviation, healthcare facilities, educational institutes, fire stations, religious facilities and small-scale commercials.

Her responsibilities include field assessments, designing HVAC systems, providing specifications and cost estimates, reviewing submittals and shop drawings, responding to
Request for Information (RFIs) and plan check comments.

She has worked as a designer, HVAC engineer, project
engineer and project manager during his engineering
experience. Her primary duties include the design of
HVAC, preparation of specifications and cost estimates, performance of mechanical peer review, attendance at
project meetings and project coordination. Additional
responsibilities for Khushboo consist of initial design development, field investigations, and heating and
cooling load calculations, preparation of California
Administrative Code Title 24 energy compliance documents.

Khushboo’s personal business motto is,
“With my dedication and hard work I will go above and beyond our goals”.

Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 19
Company Personnel
Himanshu Patel, EIT, LEED AP
Senior Mechanical Design Engineer | Senior Associate
Mechanical Engineer
Contact Number: 626-650-0350
9 Years of Experience
Joined PBS Engineers, Inc. in 2016
Background
• M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas • B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Gujarat Technological University, Gujarat, India Selected Project Experience
• City of Cerritos, Cerritos, California
Civic Center HVAC Replacement
• City of Poway, Poway, California
City Hall – Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Equipment Assessment and System Function Analysis
• City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana, California
New Bike Station
• Metropolitan Water District Headquarters Building, Los Angeles, California, Comprehensive Assessment and Report for Chiller Water Plant Efficiency and Recommendations for Improvements
• City of Riverside, Riverside, California
Public Works Department – Water Quality Control Plant Renovation • Northrop Grumman, Manhattan Beach, CA
Building O3 Interior HVAC Upgrade
• LAUSD, Apperson Elementary School, Sunland, California Replace Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning Systems • East Whittier City School District, Oceanview Elementary School, Whittier, CA Campus Wide Fire Alarm and HVAC Upgrade
Himanshu Patel is HVAC mechanical engineer and has
experience in both residential and commercial projects. In addition to this, he has experience in the field of Residential Sound Insulation (RSI) and has worked for various sound insulation programs such as San Diego Quieter Home
Program. His responsibilities include field assessments, designing HVAC systems, providing specifications and
cost estimates, reviewing submittals and shop drawings, responding to Request for Information (RFIs) and plan check comments.

Himanshu provides a professional experience in terms of his knowledge for different kinds of mechanical equipment present and their application for design purpose for
sound insulation projects. He has knowledge of California Mechanical Code, California Building Code and California Plumbing Code. He also has experience in producing Title 24 calculations for residential and commercial projects.

His experience includes various aspects of construction activities.

Himanshu’s personal business motto is,
“We see our customers as invited guests to a party and we are the hosts. It’s our job every day to make every important aspect of the customer experience a little bit better.” Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 20
Company Personnel
Ramon Camacho
Senior Associate
Project Senior Plumbing & Fire Protection Engineer
Contact Number: 626-650-0350
25 Years of Experience
Joined PBS Engineers, Inc. in 2009
Background
• UCLA Extension, Plumbing Design Systems Certification • Oklahoma State University, Correspondence Education
• Fire Protection and Safety Engineering Technology Program Selected Project Experience
• City of Cerritos, Cerritos, California
Civic Center HVAC Replacement
• City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana, California
New Bike Station
• City of Riverside, Riverside, California
Public Works Department – Water Quality Control Plant Renovation • City of Simi Valley, California, City Hall HVAC Replacement • USPS, Industry Processing & Distribution Facility Center, City of Industry, CA Mechanical Controls System Comprehensive Assessment and Report • United States Postal Service, Los Angeles Processing and Distribution Facility Center, Los Angeles, CA
Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Assessment and Report • Northrop Grumman, Manhattan Beach, CA
Building O3 Interior HVAC Upgrade
Ramon Camacho is responsible for plumbing and fire
protection systems design. Ramon has over twenty-five
years of design and construction experience, and over
fourteen years’ experience in fire protection design. He is responsible for plumbing and fire protection systems design and has designed a comprehensive range of plumbing
systems such as: sanitary waste and vent, domestic cold water, natural gas, storm water and compressed air.

He has also designed a comprehensive range of fire
protection systems such as: hydraulic calculations, fire sprinkler layout, pre-action, deluge and FM200 design.

Ramon’s additional responsibilities include the research and application of building, plumbing and fire protection codes to develop design criteria, scope and construction documentation. He also has experience in preliminary
design, construction documentation, calculations,
equipment, document review and punch list observations.

4. Narrative
One of the most important considerations to improvements to public facilities would be to keep them in operation during the duration of construction. The project schedule should include a construction phasing plan to ensure constructibility while fulfilling the needs of staff and the public.

There is an intimate relationship between schedule, cost and value engineering; a cost control through the preparation, evaluation and consideration of a minimum three (3) conceptual schemes should be proposed for school improvements, once the most cost effective scheme is selected the detail design should start. The methodology for value engineering shall be the one that starts with the design of the project and continues with a cost consideration of each inclusion of equipment and device to the project. The value engineering shall be reviewed at each milestone of the project design and verify that the project design is within the budget.

Every project with the objective of optimizing energy efficiency, environmental responsiveness, and the use of renewable energy sources through MEP engineering wherever possible. Depending on the project and owner goals, either mandatory codes or energy efficient guidelines act as a baseline to begin the design process, or the principles of these guidelines are incorporated with engineering innovation to develop new solutions to specific planning criteria. PBS commitment to improve the energy efficiency, environmental responsiveness, and use of renewable energy sources in new or existing buildings. PBS to also implement and consider post COVID MEP strategies to immunize the risk of spread of air born viruses and bacteria.

5. Proposed Subconsultants
Costa & Associates, Structural Engineers (MBE/SBE)
Orlando Costa, SE
Principal
Contact Number: (626) 960-1811
40+ Years of Experience
Background
• BSCE, California State University, Northridge
• California Structural Engineer, SE2285
• California Civil Engineer, CE 26923
Selected Project Experiences
• North Hollywood High School Modernization, LAUSD
• Marshall High School Gymnasium Building, PUSD
• ACES Charter School
• Valley High School #5, LAUSD
• Y.O.U. Charter High School
• South Region #5, LAUSD
• Monsenor Oscar Romero Charter School
• Driffill Elementary School, Oxnard USD
• Silver Lake Library, County of Los Angeles
• El Monte Aquatic Center, City of El Monte
Orlando Costa founded the firm in 1981 after a highly successful career with major firms in the Los Angeles area. Mr. Costa holds a degree in Engineering from California State University, Northridge (1974) and is licensed as a Structural Engineer in California a (SE 2285), During his 42 years as principal of the firm, he has led the design work on many and widely varied projects including office buildings, schools, institutional and industrial projects, hotels, maintenance facilities, etc.

5. Proposed Subconsultants
R. Alberto Arango, Architect
R. Alberto Arango
Architectural Consultant (Self-Employed
Contact Number: (818) 400-8909
30+ Years of Experience
Background
• Bachelor Degree in Architecture, Assoc. AIA, Universidad Piloto de Colombia, Bogota. Colombia
Selected Project Experiences
• Mathew Redifer Residence
• Boys Gymnasium at Westchester High School
• Renovation Sweetwater Union School District
• Barstow Community College
• Garden Grove Gas Station
• Cudahay Gas Station
Alberto Arango works as an Architectural consultant for PBS engineers. He has contributed to various projects, such as LAUSD, Sweetwater Union School District of San Diego California, Barstow Community College, Garden Grove Gas Station and Cudahay Gas Station. He has contributed design and preparations for numerous projects, including the Boys Gymnasium for Westchester High School and the Mathew Redifer Residence Renovation in Palmdale, California.

5. Proposed Subconsultants
Yuang Tai, Inc.

Yuang Steve Hseih
Principal Construction Cost Consultant
Contact Number: (626) 446-2388
30+ Years of Experience
Background
• M.S. Civil Engineering & Construction Management, Oklahoma State University
• B.S. Architecture, National Cheng-Kung University, Taiwan Selected Project Experiences
• San Jose State University
• Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Existing Facilities • Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) For nine campuses • Department of Energy, U.S. Air Force, Navy, Army and Corps of Engineers • Nationwide Developers, Institutional Entities and Major Corporations Steve Hsieh possesses more than thirty-five years of construction industry related experience in the field of professional Cost Estimating. He assumes bottom line responsibility for the projects he is involved with and applies his expertise on a daily basis in regard to preparing budget type estimates as well as competitive bid estimates. His experience and expertise includes, but is not limited to the following:
• Estimate over 600 major projects totaling over 5 Billion in construction value
• Estimate over 80 complex projects per year as Principal Cost Consultant
• Campus Cost Consultant for San Jose State University
• Contract Cost Consultant to Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD) for the District’s nine campuses
• Developed an Objective Cost Evaluation Technique to monitor Electrical/Mechanical subcontractors in the field
• The $24.5 Million LACCD Auditorium Modernization Project Glendora | Houston | Los Angeles | Orange County | San Diego | Santa Clara 3187 Airway Avenue, Building “C,” Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | T 949.368.3001 | F 626.650.0352 www.pbsengineers.com
PBS ENGINEERS 25

6. Client References
City of Cerritos
Contact Person: Amandeep Mann, (562) 916-1219, [email protected] Responsibility/relationship to project: Associate Civil Engineer Address: 18125 Bloomfield Avenue, Cerritos, CA 90703-3130 Description of services: PBS Engineers provided mechanical, electrical, and plumbing design and engineering services in the planning, design, and construction drawings for the replacement of Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) at the City Hall and the Council Chamber. The City Hall has two levels with a basement and is an approximately 45,000-square-foot facility. The Council Chamber is approximately 8,000 square feet.

The Scope of Work involved the design of a new HVAC system at the City Hall and Council Chamber to replace the current HVAC system in operation. The existing HVAC system was almost 50 years old and in need of replacement. The overall goal of the project was to install an HVAC system that is responsive to the yearround temperature fluctuations in the City buildings.

Key Personnel: Tariq Hassan, Norman Patel, Khushboo Patel, Kunal Shah, Ramon Camacho City of Poway
Contact Person: Jeff Beers, (858) 668-4624, [email protected] Responsibility/relationship to project: Special Projects Engineer Address: 13325 Civic Center Dr, Poway, CA 92064
Description of services: PBS Engineers has prepared an extensive report to include Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) Assessment and Functional analysis for City Hall Building (CHB) and the City Council Building (CCB), located at 13325 Civic Center Dr, Poway, California. Report comprises of detailed analysis of the existing HVAC Systems, Building Automation System, the Central Plant Equipment such as 250 Ton air cooled chiller, chilled water pumps, 2 million Btu boiler, heating hot water pumps, Air Handling Units, VAV terminal units, Fan Coil Units, Condensers, and Exhaust Fans. This reportwas prepared and based on the extensive survey, visual filed observations, Test and Air Balance report review, available As-built drawings study, maintenance interviews and input from users and concluded the report with fully executed summary comprising all findings and recommendation for all HVAC equipment.

6. Client References
City of Commerce
Contact Person: Amy Chang, AIA, LEED AP, (Stantec), (213) 955-3506, [email protected] Responsibility/relationship to project: Principal
Address: 801 S Figueroa St Unit 300, Los Angeles, CA 90017 Description of services: PBS provided Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, Fire Alarm, Fire Protection, and Low Voltage Engineering Services for the new transit and public works operations and maintenance facility, including the transition to zero-emission buses (ZEBs) in alignment with California’s clean energy mandates. PBS has provided electrical design services for over 100 electrical vehicle charging points to support the current and future bus fleet and commercial vehicles to serve the city’s transit system’s needs as well as to comply with Cal Green requirements. The new facility is located on approximately 6.5 acres at a former power generation plant, which was repurposed and rebuilt with resiliency in mind. The project consists of a 20,000-square-foot administration and operations building, a 15,000-square-foot maintenance facility, site improvements for staff/ visitor parking, and on-site fueling and washing.

Key Personnel: Tariq Hassan, Khushboo Patel, Kunal Shah, Ramon Camacho City of Santa Ana
Contact Person: Nicholas Acevedo (Gensler), (949) 260-8597, [email protected] Responsibility/relationship to project: Senior Associate Address: 4675 MacArthur Court Suite 100. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Description of services: PBS provided Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing engineering design services for this new bicycle center including indoor bicycle storage, lockers, restrooms with showers, a storage room and a community bicycle workshop. This project covered roughly 4,000 square feet.

6. Client References
Metropolitan Water District
Contact Person: Kristof Schnaitmann, S.E. (ABS Consulting), (714) 734-2521, [email protected] Responsibility/relationship to project: Principal Engineer Address: 420 Exchange, Suite 200, Irvine, California 92602 Description of services: The Scope of Work for this project involved performing assessment of the Three (3) existing Chillers associated Pumps and Cooling Towers performance serving the Metropolitan Water District Headquarters Building. Prepare report to provide recommendations for improvement to the overall efficiency of the existing Chilled Water Central Plant and provide alternate options identifying their advantages and disadvantages.

Key Personnel: Tariq Hassan, Kunal Shah, Himanshu Patel, Ramon Camacho Northrop Grumman
Contact Person: Bertha A. Olmos, AIA, NCARB, (Studio+), (323) 254-9200, [email protected] Responsibility/relationship to project: PM and Lead Architect Address: 4605 Lankershim Blvd. Suite 300, North Hollywood, CA 91602 Description of services: PBS provided MEP/FA/FP engineering services for replacement of existing HVAC originally installed in 1981 with new energy efficient HVAC system without major structural upgrade for two story building approximately 50,000 sq. ft area. Project includes replacement of large existing custom air handling units, Pneumatic to digital controls upgrade, restroom upgrade, large presentation room 230+ occupant capacity with STC 50 sound rating, brake rooms, huddle rooms, server room, computer labs. The challenge was to design the entire project from inception to completion withing 3 months including Northrop Grumman engineering facility review. PBS was able to deliver the project on time and able to get approval from AHJ with minor plan check correction.The highlight of the project is Secured HVAC system with white noise masking, Power filters for security requirements, SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility) wall construction, stringent noise attenuation criteria for conference room and individual offices.

SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE
Item Description Weeks
1 Site Investigation, As-Built Drawings Review and Schematic Assessment Report / Design
Electronic Files
2 2 City Review and Comments 1
3 Design Development 30% Submittal
Electronic Files
Basis of Design
30% CD Drawings
Outline Specification TOC
4 4 City Review and Comments 2
5 Construction Design Phase 60% Submittal
Electronic Files
Specifications
50% CD Drawings
3 6 City Review and Comments 2
7 Final Plans and Specifications 90% Submittal
Electronic Files
Pre-Final Specifications (stamped and signed)
3 8 City Review and Comments 1
9 Plan Check Final Submittal (Stamped and Signed)
100% Drawings
100% Specifications
100% Cut Sheets
100% Calculations
Electronic Files
6 10 Bid Document 2
TOTAL WEEKS 26

COMPENSATION BY PERCENTAGE & A/E FEE
No. Phase Percentage of Fee Total
1 Site Investigation & Assessment 10% $7,400.00
2 Design Development 25% $18,500.00
3 60% Construction Documents 20% $14,800.00
4 100% Construction Documents 20% $14,800.00
5 Plan Check Review and Approval 5% $3,700.00
6 Bidding and Award 2% $1,480.00
7 Construction Administration 15% $11,100.00
8 Project Closeout – Record Set 3% $2,220.00
TOTAL PERCENTAGE OF FEE & A/E FEE 100% $74,000.00
Notes:

1. Plan Check Fee paid by the City.

2. Additional service per City’s request.

3. 10% mark-up on consultants’ additional service.

4. See attached Schedule of Charges.

5. City shall provide as-built record drawings.

6. Duct leakage test is included with optional fee refer to Table-B.

7. Duct cleaning specification and scope of work direction is included under the main design scope.

8. Prereading air flow test is included with optional fee refer to Table-B.

TABLE - A
*Optional - Contingency Fees $21,000.00

1. Existing roof structure and framing modification for new units’ weight with roof curb and economizers.

2. Existing units are Trane and Daikin has different supply and return duct arrangement versus Carrier units already purchased by the City. This may require roof opening and main supply and return duct reconfiguration.

TABLE - B
*Optional - Fees (AABC Air Balancing Company) $30,000.00 Markup 10% (PBS Engineers) $3,000.00
TOTAL FEE $33,000.00

1. Perform air flow test for pre-air readings at each supply and return air grilles.

2. Perform duct leakage test for all rooftop HVAC units and existing air distribution devices.

3. Perform duct travers air flow readings on main ducts for all rooftop units.

4. Above listed work will be performed by AABC test and balance company during second shift (after hours schedule).

SCHEDULE OF CHARGES
The fee for our services will be based on the charges listed below. All fee quotations are applicable for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of the proposal to which this schedule is attached. We reserve the right to modify these rates upon thirty (30) days advance notice.

PERSONNEL/HOURLY RATE
Principal Engineer $250 Senior CADD/Revit Operator $155 Project Manager $230 CADD/Revit Operator/Drafting $135
Project/Senior Engineer $195 Senior Field Representative $155 Senior Designer $175 Field Representative $145
Designer $165 Word Processor/Clerical $110
These rates apply to regular time and travel time in the continental United States. A maximum travel time of eight (8) hours will be charged on any day. If required in the interest of the project, Overtime will be charged at the above rates for professional personnel and at 1.5 times the above rates for other personnel. Overtime will apply to the time in excess of eight (8) hours per weekday and all-time on Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays. In the event of adverse weather conditions or other factors beyond our control, a standby charge of four (4) hours per weekday will be made for field personnel. Reimbursable expenses are in addition to personnel rates. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at cost except as noted below.

MISCELLANEOUS CHARGES
Passenger Car $0.85/mile
Plotting $6.60/sheet
Photocopy $0.12/page

INSURANCE
PBS Engineers maintains Professional Liability and General Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage with a limit of $10,000,000 per occurrence for its own account and will furnish certificates of such insurance upon request. In the event the Client desires additional coverage, we will obtain additional insurance at the Client's expense upon the Client's written request.

PBS ENGINEERS 30
PBS ENGINEERS 29

8. Evidence of Compliance with City Insurance Requirements 07/28/2023
Cornerstone Specialty Insurance Services, Inc.
14252 Culver Drive, A299
Irvine CA 92604
Tina Cowie
(714) 731-7700 (714) 731-7750
[email protected]
PBS ENGINEERS, INC.
2100 E. Route 66, Suite 210
Glendora CA 91740
RLI Insurance Company 13056
Arch Insurance Company 11150
Burlington Insurance Company 23620
23/24 COVERAGES
A

ADDT'L INSURED / PRIMARY
BLNKT WVR OF SUBRO PSB0001164 08/01/2023 08/01/2024
1,000,000
1,000,000
10,000

INCLUDED
2,000,000
2,000,000
A PSA0001043 08/01/2023 08/01/2024
1,000,000
A/C
0 PSE0005278/704BE08582 08/01/2023 08/01/2024
5mil/5mil +
5mil/5mil =
10mil Total
A Y PSW0001136 08/01/2023 08/01/2024 1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000

B PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY &
EXCESS PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY PAAEP0129103/XS230517 08/01/2023 08/01/2024 ECH CLAIM/ANN AGG $5mil/$5mil +
ECH CLAIM/ANN AGG $5mil/$5mil =
CLAIMS MADE $10mil Total
Evidence of coverage in force. Contractual insurance requirements will be addressed at the time the contract is awarded.

FOR PROPOSAL PURPOSES ONLY

TO VERIFY COVERAGE IN FORCE

CONTACT CORNERSTONE SPECIALTY

SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE

THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.

INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :

INSURER E :

INSURER D :

INSURER C :

INSURER B :

INSURER A :

NAIC #
NAME:

CONTACT
(A/C, No):

FAX
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:

PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext):

PHONE

INSURED
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:

IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.

If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).

THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS

CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.

OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR
WVD
ADDL
INSD

THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS

CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$ PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person)

COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT

AUTOS ONLY

AUTOS ONLY AUTOS

NON-OWNED

OWNED SCHEDULED

ANY AUTO

AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N

WORKERS COMPENSATION

AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under

ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
ER

OTH- STATUTEPER
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS POLICY EXP (MM/DD/YYYY)

POLICY EFF LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)

EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB EACH OCCURRENCE $
AGGREGATE $
$
OCCUR

CLAIMS-MADE
DED RETENTION $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
GENERAL AGGREGATE $
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $
MED EXP (Any one person) $
EACH OCCURRENCE $

DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $

COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY

CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:

POLICY PROJECT LOC

CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)

CANCELLATION

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.

CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED

9. Exceptions and Deviations
PBS Engineers, Inc. has no objection to the contract requirements as set forth in Exhibit E.

Please feel free the contact us at 626.650.0350 or [email protected] with any questions you might have.
55414.00000\32996936.2
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES AND COMPENSATION

1. Plan Check Fee paid by the City.

2. Additional service per City’s request.

3. 10% mark-up on consultants’ additional service.

4. See attached Schedule of Charges.

5. City shall provide as-built record drawings.

6. Duct leakage test is included with optional fee refer to Table-B.

7. Duct cleaning specification and scope of work direction is included under the main design scope.

8. Prereading air flow test is included with optional fee refer to Table-B.

TABLE - A
*Optional - Contingency Fees $21,000.00

1. Existing roof structure and framing modification for new units’ weight with roof curb and economizers.

TABLE - B
*Optional - Fees (AABC Air Balancing Company) $30,000.00 Markup 10% (PBS Engineers) $3,000.00
TOTAL FEE $33,000.00

1. Perform air flow test for pre-air readings at each supply and return air grilles.

2. Perform duct leakage test for all rooftop HVAC units and existing air distribution devices.

3. Perform duct travers air flow readings on main ducts for all rooftop units.

4. Above listed work will be performed by AABC test and balance company during second shift (after hours schedule).

PBS ENGINEERS 29
55414.00000\32996936.2
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

FUNDING AGREEMENT
County of Orange Page 1 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
CONTRACT # 012-23010767-CV
FOR
CORONAVIRUS AID, RELIEF, AND ECONOMIC SECURITIES (CARES) ACT, H.R.748

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT

PUBLIC FACILITIES & IMPROVEMENTS

CITY OF STANTON COMMUNITY CENTER IMPROVEMENTS

BETWEEN

COUNTY OF ORANGE
AND

CITY OF STANTON
CFDA# FAIN# PROGRAM/SERVICE TITLE FUNDING AGENCY

14.218 Pending Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security (CARES)
Act, H.R. 748
Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG)/Housing
Rehabilitation, Public Facilities
& Improvements, and Public
Services
U.S. Housing & Urban
Development (HUD)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 2 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Table of Contents
RECITALS............................................................................................................................... 5 General Terms and Conditions: ........................................................................................... 7 A. Governing Law and Venue:........................................................................................ 7 B. Entire Contract:........................................................................................................... 7 C. Amendments:.............................................................................................................. 7 D. Intentionally left blank................................................................................................ 7 E. Delivery:....................................................................................................................... 7 F. Acceptance Payment:................................................................................................. 7 G. Intentionally left blank:............................................................................................... 7 H. Patent/Copyright Materials/Proprietary Infringement:............................................. 7 I. Assignment:................................................................................................................ 8 J. Non-Discrimination:.................................................................................................... 8 K. Termination:................................................................................................................ 8 L. Consent to Breach Not Waiver:................................................................................. 8 M. Independent Subrecipient:......................................................................................... 8 N. Performance Warranty: .............................................................................................. 8 O. Insurance Requirements:........................................................................................... 9 P. Changes: ................................................................................................................... 12 Q. Change of Ownership/Name, Litigation Status, Conflicts with County Interest: 12 R. Force Majeure: .......................................................................................................... 13 S. Confidentiality:.......................................................................................................... 13 T. Compliance with Laws: ............................................................................................ 13 U. Intentionally left blank.............................................................................................. 13 V. Severability: .............................................................................................................. 13 W. Attorney Fees:........................................................................................................... 13 X. Interpretation: ........................................................................................................... 13 Y. Employee Eligibility Verification: ............................................................................ 14 Z. Indemnification:........................................................................................................ 14 AA. Audits/Inspections:................................................................................................... 14 BB. Contingency of Funds:............................................................................................. 15 CC. Expenditure Limit: .................................................................................................... 15 Additional Terms and Conditions:..................................................................................... 16

1. Scope of Contract:.................................................................................................... 16

2. Term of Contract....................................................................................................... 16 DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 3 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

3. Renewal:.................................................................................................................... 16

4. Maximum Obligation: ............................................................................................... 16

5. Amendments - Changes/Extra Work:...................................................................... 16

6. Breach of Contract: .................................................................................................. 16

7. Conditions Affecting Work: ..................................................................................... 17

8. Civil Rights:............................................................................................................... 17

9. Conflict of Interest – Subrecipient’s Personnel:.................................................... 17

10. Conflict of Interest – County Personnel: ................................................................ 17

11. Consulting Contract – Follow-On Work:................................................................. 17

12. Project Manager, County: ........................................................................................ 18

13. Subrecipient’s Project Manager and Key Personnel:............................................ 18

14. Subrecipient Personnel – Reference Checks:........................................................ 18

15. Data – Title To ........................................................................................................... 18

16. Licenses .................................................................................................................... 19

17. Disputes – Contract:................................................................................................. 19

18. EDD Independent Subrecipient Reporting Requirements: ................................... 19

19. Emergency/Declared Disaster Requirements: ....................................................... 20

20. Errors and Omissions: ............................................................................................. 20

21. Non-Supplantation of Funds: .................................................................................. 21

22. Satisfactory Work ..................................................................................................... 21

23. Access and Records: ............................................................................................... 21

24. Signature in Counterparts........................................................................................ 22

25. Reports/Meetings...................................................................................................... 22

26. Subcontracting: ........................................................................................................ 22

27. Equal Employment Opportunity:............................................................................. 22

28. Gratuities................................................................................................................... 23

29. News/Information Release:...................................................................................... 23

30. Notices....................................................................................................................... 23

31. Ownership of Documents ........................................................................................ 24

32. Precedence: .............................................................................................................. 24

33. Termination – Orderly: ............................................................................................. 24

34. County Branding Requirements – Publicity, Literature, Advertisement and Social Media: ….................................................................................................................. 24 Program Specific Terms and Conditions: ......................................................................... 26

35. Debarment:................................................................................................................ 26

36. Lobbying: .................................................................................................................. 26 DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 4 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

37. Fraud:......................................................................................................................... 26

38. Fiscal Accountability:............................................................................................... 26

39. Performance Standards: .......................................................................................... 27

40. Budget Schedule:. .................................................................................................... 27

41. Payment Requirements:........................................................................................... 27

42. Modification of Budget:. ........................................................................................... 29

43. Annual Audit: . ......................................................................................................... 29

44. UEI and D-U-N-S Number and Related Information: ............................................... 29

45. Program Income: ...................................................................................................... 30

46. Performance:............................................................................................................. 30

47. Performance Monitoring: ......................................................................................... 32

48. Federal Administrative and Related Requirements:. ............................................. 32

49. Definitions: ................................................................................................................. 43 Signature Page .................................................................................................................... 46

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A - Scope of Services
Attachment B - Payment/Compensation
Attachment C - Budget Schedule
Attachment D - Staffing Plan
Attachment E- Performance Standards

EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1– OC Community Resources Contract Reimbursement Policy Exhibit 2 – Drug Free Workplace Certification
Exhibit 3 – Debarment and Suspension Certificate
Exhibit 4 – Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying
Exhibit 5 - Lobbying Certification
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 5 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Contract # 012-23010767-CV
with
City of Stanton
for
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, H.R. 748 Community Development Block Grant
Public Facilities & Improvements City of Stanton Community Center Improvements This Contract # 012-23010767-CV for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, H.R. 748 / Community Development Block Grant / Public Facilities & Improvements/ City of Stanton Community Center Improvements(hereinafter referred to as “Contract”) is made and entered into as of the date fully executed by and between the County of Orange, a political subdivision of the State of California; hereinafter referred to as “County” and City of Stanton, D-U-N-S 096892401 and UEI# P5N5EKP9DD46, a California Municipality, with a place of business at 7800 Katella Ave., Stanton, CA 90680 (hereinafter referred to as “Subrecipient”), with County and Subrecipient sometimes referred to as “party” or collectively as “parties”.

ATTACHMENTS
This Contract is comprised of this document and the following Attachments, which are attached hereto and incorporated by reference into this Contract:

Attachment A – Scope of Services
Attachment B – Payment/Compensation
Attachment C – Budget Schedule
Attachment D – Staffing Plan
Attachment E- Performance Standards
Exhibit 1– OC Community Resources Contract Reimbursement Policy Exhibit 2 – Drug Free Workplace Certification
Exhibit 3 – Debarment and Suspension Certificate
Exhibit 4 – Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying
Exhibit 5 – Certification Regarding Lobbying

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Subrecipient and County are entering into this Contract for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, H.R. 748 / Community Development Block Grant / Public Facilities & Improvements/ City of Stanton Community Center Improvements9under a cost reimbursement Contract; and
WHEREAS, County solicited, under Agenda Staff Report approved by the Board of Supervisors of Orange County on November 8, 2022, this Contract for services as set forth herein, and Subrecipient represented that it is qualified to provide Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, H.R. 748 / Community Development Block Grant / Public DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 6 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Facilities & Improvements/ City of Stanton Community Center Improvements to the County as further set forth here; and
WHEREAS, Subrecipient agrees to provide Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, H.R. 748 / Community Development Block Grant / Public Facilities & Improvements/ City of Stanton Community Center Improvements to the County as further set forth in the Scope of Service, attached hereto as Attachment A; and WHEREAS, County agrees to pay Subrecipient based on the schedule of fees set forth in Payment/Compensation, attached hereto as Attachment B; and WHEREAS, Subrecipient agrees to manage allotted funding set forth in the Budget Schedule, attached hereto as Attachment C; and
WHEREAS, Subrecipient agrees to provide staff set forth in Staffing Plan, attached hereto as Attachment D; and
WHEREAS, the County Board of Supervisors has authorized the OC Community Resources Director or his designee to enter into a Contract for Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, H.R. 748 / Community Development Block Grant / Public Facilities & Improvements/ City of Stanton Community Center Improvements with the Subrecipient to carry out certain program services and activities; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree as follows:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 7 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

ARTICLES
General Terms and Conditions:

A. Governing Law and Venue: This Contract has been negotiated and executed in the State of California and shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. In the event of any legal action to enforce or interpret this Contract, the sole and exclusive venue shall be a court of competent jurisdiction located in Orange County, California, and the parties hereto agree to and do hereby submit to the jurisdiction of such court, notwithstanding Code of Civil Procedure Section 394.

Furthermore, the parties specifically agree to waive any and all rights to request that an action be transferred for adjudication to another county.

B. Entire Contract: This Contract contains the entire Contract between the parties with respect to the matters herein, and there are no restrictions, promises, warranties or undertakings other than those set forth herein or referred to herein. No exceptions, alternatives, substitutes or revisions are valid or binding on County unless authorized by County in writing. Electronic acceptance of any additional terms, conditions or supplemental Contracts by any County employee or agent, including but not limited to installers of software, shall not be valid or binding on County unless accepted in writing by County’s Contract Administrator.

C. Amendments: No alteration or variation of the terms of this Contract shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the parties; no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either of the parties; and no exceptions, alternatives, substitutes or revisions are valid or binding on County unless authorized by County in writing.

D. Intentionally left blank
E. Delivery: Time of delivery of goods or services is of the essence in this Contract.

County reserves the right to refuse any goods or services and to cancel all or any part of the goods not conforming to applicable specifications, drawings, samples or descriptions or services that do not conform to the prescribed Scope of Services.

Acceptance of any part of the order for goods shall not bind County to accept future shipments nor deprive it of the right to return goods already accepted at Subrecipient’s expense. Over shipments and under shipments of goods shall be only as agreed to in writing by County. Delivery shall not be deemed to be complete until all goods or services have actually been received and accepted in writing by County.

F. Acceptance Payment: Unless otherwise agreed to in writing by County, 1) acceptance shall not be deemed complete unless in writing and until all the goods/services have actually been received, inspected, and tested to the satisfaction of County, and 2) payment shall be made in arrears after satisfactory acceptance.

G. Intentionally left blank:

H. Patent/Copyright Materials/Proprietary Infringement: Unless otherwise expressly provided in this Contract, Subrecipient shall be solely responsible for clearing the right DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 8 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
to use any patented or copyrighted materials in the performance of this Contract.

Subrecipient warrants that any software as modified through services provided hereunder will not infringe upon or violate any patent, proprietary right, or trade secret right of any third party. Subrecipient agrees that, in accordance with the more specific requirement contained in paragraph “Z” below, it shall indemnify, defend and hold County and County Indemnitees harmless from any and all such claims and be responsible for payment of all costs, damages, penalties and expenses related to or arising from such claim(s), including, costs and expenses but not including attorney’s fees.

I. Assignment: The terms, covenants, and conditions contained herein shall apply to and bind the heirs, successors, executors, administrators and assigns of the parties.

Furthermore, neither the performance of this Contract nor any portion thereof may be assigned by Subrecipient without the express written consent of County. Any attempt by Subrecipient to assign the performance or any portion thereof of this Contract without the express written consent of County shall be invalid and shall constitute a breach of this Contract.

J. Non-Discrimination: In the performance of this Contract, Subrecipient agrees that it will comply with the requirements of Section 1735 of the California Labor Code and not engage nor permit any subcontractors to engage in discrimination in employment of persons because of the race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status, or sex of such persons.

Subrecipient acknowledges that a violation of this provision shall subject Subrecipient to penalties pursuant to Section 1741 of the California Labor Code.

K. Termination: In addition to any other remedies or rights it may have by law, County has the right to immediately terminate this Contract without penalty for cause or after 30 days’ written notice without cause, unless otherwise specified. Cause shall be defined as any material breach of contract, any misrepresentation or fraud on the part of the Subrecipient. Exercise by County of its right to terminate the Contract shall relieve County of all further obligation.

L. Consent to Breach Not Waiver: No term or provision of this Contract shall be deemed waived and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by the party claimed to have waived or consented. Any consent by any party to, or waiver of, a breach by the other, whether express or implied, shall not constitute consent to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach.

M. Independent Subrecipient: Subrecipient shall be considered an independent contractor and neither Subrecipient, its employees, nor anyone working under Subrecipient shall be considered an agent or an employee of County. Neither Subrecipient, its employees nor anyone working under Subrecipient shall qualify for workers’ compensation or other fringe benefits of any kind through County.

N. Performance Warranty: Subrecipient shall warrant all work under this Contract, taking necessary steps and precautions to perform the work to County’s satisfaction.

Subrecipient shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical assurance, timely completion and coordination of all documentation and other goods/services DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 9 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
furnished by the Subrecipient under this Contract. Subrecipient shall perform all work diligently, carefully, and in a good and workmanlike manner; shall furnish all necessary labor, supervision, machinery, equipment, materials, and supplies, shall at its sole expense obtain and maintain all permits and licenses required by public authorities, including those of County required in its governmental capacity, in connection with performance of the work. If permitted to subcontract, Subrecipient shall be fully responsible for all work performed by subcontractors.

O. Insurance Requirements:

Prior to the provision of services under this Contract, the Subrecipient agrees to purchase all required insurance at Subrecipient’s expense, including all endorsements required herein, necessary to satisfy the County that the insurance provisions of this Contract have been complied with. Subrecipient agrees to keep such insurance coverage, Certificates of Insurance, and endorsements on deposit with the County during the entire term of this Contract. In addition, all subcontractors performing work on behalf of Subrecipient pursuant to this Contract shall obtain insurance subject to the same terms and conditions as set forth herein for Subrecipient.

Subrecipient shall ensure that all subcontractors performing work on behalf of Subrecipient pursuant to this Contract shall be covered under Subrecipient’s insurance as an Additional Insured or maintain insurance subject to the same terms and conditions as set forth herein for Subrecipient. Subrecipient shall not allow subcontractors to work if subcontractors have less than the level of coverage required by County from Subrecipient under this Contract. It is the obligation of Subrecipient to provide notice of the insurance requirements to every subcontractor and to receive proof of insurance prior to allowing any subcontractor to begin work. Such proof of insurance must be MAINTAINED by Subrecipient through the entirety of this Contract for inspection by County representative(s) at any reasonable time.

All self-insured retentions (SIRs) shall be clearly stated on the Certificate of Insurance.

Any self-insured retention (SIR) in an amount in excess of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) shall specifically be approved by the County’s Risk Manager, or designee, upon review of Subrecipient’s current audited financial report. If Subrecipient’s SIR is approved, Subrecipient, in addition to, and without limitation of, any other indemnity provision(s) in this Contract, agrees to all of the following:
1) In addition to the duty to indemnify and hold the County harmless against any and all liability, claim, demand or suit resulting from Subrecipient’s, its agents, employee’s or subcontractor’s performance of this Contract, Subrecipient shall defend the County at its sole cost and expense with counsel approved by Board of supervisors against same; and
2) Subrecipient’s duty to defend, as stated above, shall be absolute and irrespective of any duty to indemnify or hold harmless; and
3) The provisions of California Civil Code Section 2860 shall apply to any and all actions to which the duty to defend stated above applies, and the Subrecipient’s SIR provision shall be interpreted as though the Subrecipient was an insurer and the County was the insured.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 10 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
If the Subrecipient fails to maintain insurance acceptable to the County for the full term of this Contract, the County may terminate this Contract.

Qualified Insurer
The policy or policies of insurance must be issued by an insurer with a minimum rating of A- (Secure A.M. Best's Rating) and VIII (Financial Size Category as determined by the most current edition of the Best's Key Rating Guide/Property-Casualty/United States or ambest.com). It is preferred, but not mandatory, that the insurer be licensed to do business in the State of California (California Admitted Carrier).

If the insurance carrier does not have an A.M. Best Rating of A-/VIII, the CEO/Office of Risk Management retains the right to approve or reject a carrier after a review of the company's performance and financial ratings.

The policy or policies of insurance maintained by the Subrecipient shall provide the minimum limits and coverage as set forth below:

Coverage Minimum Limits
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence
$2,000,000 aggregate
Automobile Liability including coverage $1,000,000 per occurrence for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles
Workers Compensation Statutory
Employers Liability Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence Network Security & Privacy $1,000,000 per claims-made
Liability
Professional Liability $1,000,000 per claims-made
$1,000,000 aggregate
Sexual Misconduct $1,000,000 per occurrence
Employee Dishonesty $100,000 per occurrence
Required Coverage Forms
The Commercial General Liability coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 00 01, or a substitute form providing liability coverage at least as broad.

The Business Auto Liability coverage shall be written on ISO form CA 00 01, CA 00 05, CA 0012, CA 00 20, or a substitute form providing coverage at least as broad.

Required Endorsements
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 11 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
The Commercial General Liability policy shall contain the following endorsements, which shall accompany the Certificate of Insurance:
1) An Additional Insured endorsement using ISO form CG 20 26 04 13 or a form at least as broad naming the County of Orange its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees as Additional Insureds, or provide blanket coverage, which will state AS REQUIRED BY WRITTEN Contract. 2) A primary non-contributing endorsement using ISO form CG 20 01 04 13, or a form at least as broad evidencing that the Subrecipient’s insurance is primary and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the County of Orange shall be excess and non-contributing.

The Network Security and Privacy Liability policy shall contain the following endorsements which shall accompany the Certificate of Insurance:
1) An Additional Insured endorsement naming the County of Orange, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees as Additional Insureds for its vicarious liability.
2) A primary and non-contributing endorsement evidencing that the Subrecipient’s insurance is primary and any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the County of Orange shall be excess and non-contributing.

The Workers’ Compensation policy shall contain a waiver of subrogation endorsement waiving all rights of subrogation against the County of Orange, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees or provide blanket coverage, which will state AS REQUIRED BY WRITTEN Contract.

All insurance policies required by this Contract shall waive all rights of subrogation against the County of Orange, its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees when acting within the scope of their appointment or employment.

The County of Orange shall be the loss payee on the Employee Dishonesty coverage.

A Loss Payee endorsement evidencing that the County of Orange is a Loss Payee shall accompany the Certificate of Insurance.

Subrecipient shall notify County in writing within thirty (30) days of any policy cancellation and ten (10) days for non-payment of premium and provide a copy of the cancellation notice to County. Failure to provide written notice of cancellation may constitute a material breach of the Contract, upon which the County may suspend or terminate this Contract.

If Subrecipient’s Professional Liability and Network Security & Privacy Liability are “Claims-Made” policy(ies), Subrecipient shall agree to maintain coverage for two (2) years following the completion of the Contract.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 12 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
The Commercial General Liability policy shall contain a severability of interests clause also known as a “separation of insureds” clause (standard in the ISO CG 0001 policy).

Insurance certificates should be forwarded to the agency/department address listed on the solicitation.

If the Subrecipient fails to provide the insurance certificates and endorsements within seven (7) days of notification by the Contract Administrator, award may be made to the next qualified vendor.

County expressly retains the right to require Subrecipient to increase or decrease insurance of any of the above insurance types throughout the term of this Contract. Any increase or decrease in insurance will be as deemed by County of Orange Risk Manager as appropriate to adequately protect County.

County shall notify Subrecipient in writing of changes in the insurance requirements. If Subrecipient does not deposit copies of acceptable Certificates of Insurance and endorsements with County incorporating such changes within thirty (30) days of receipt of such notice, this Contract may be in breach without further notice to Subrecipient, and County shall be entitled to all legal remedies.

The procuring of such required policy or policies of insurance shall not be construed to limit Subrecipient's liability hereunder nor to fulfill the indemnification provisions and requirements of this Contract, nor act in any way to reduce the policy coverage and limits available from the insurer.

P. Changes: Subrecipient shall make no changes in the work or perform any additional work without the County’s specific written approval.

Q. Change of Ownership/Name, Litigation Status, Conflicts with County Interest:

Subrecipient agrees that if there is a change or transfer in ownership of Subrecipient’s business prior to completion of this Contract, and the County agrees to an assignment of the Contract, the new owners shall be required under terms of sale or other instruments of transfer to assume Subrecipient’s duties and obligations contained in this Contract and complete them to the satisfaction of the County.

County reserves the right to immediately terminate the Contract in the event the County determines that the assignee is not qualified or is otherwise unacceptable to the County for the provision of services under the Contract.

In addition, Subrecipient has the duty to notify the County in writing of any change in the Subrecipient’s status with respect to name changes that do not require an assignment of the Contract. The Subrecipient is also obligated to notify the County in writing if the Subrecipient becomes a party to any litigation against the County, or a party to litigation that may reasonably affect the Subrecipient’s performance under the Contract, as well as any potential conflicts of interest between Subrecipient and County that may arise prior to or during the period of Contract performance. While Subrecipient will be required to provide this information without prompting from the County any time there is a change in Subrecipient’s name, conflict of interest or litigation status, Subrecipient must also DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 13 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
provide an update to the County of its status in these areas whenever requested by the County.

The Subrecipient shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with County interests. In addition to the Subrecipient, this obligation shall apply to the Subrecipient’s employees, agents, and subcontractors associated with the provision of goods and services provided under this Contract. The Subrecipient’s efforts shall include, but not be limited to establishing rules and procedures preventing its employees, agents, and subcontractors from providing or offering gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other considerations which could be deemed to influence or appear to influence County staff or elected officers in the performance of their duties.

R. Force Majeure: Subrecipient shall not be assessed with liquidated damages or unsatisfactory performance penalties during any delay beyond the time named for the performance of this Contract caused by any act of God, war, civil disorder, employment strike or other cause beyond its reasonable control, provided Subrecipient gives written notice of the cause of the delay to County within 36 hours of the start of the delay and Subrecipient avails himself of any available remedies.

S. Confidentiality: Subrecipient agrees to maintain the confidentiality of all County and County-related records and information pursuant to all statutory laws relating to privacy and confidentiality that currently exist or exist at any time during the term of this Contract.

All such records and information shall be considered confidential and kept confidential by Subrecipient and Subrecipient’s staff, agents and employees.

T. Compliance with Laws: Subrecipient represents and warrants that services to be provided under this Contract shall fully comply, at Subrecipient’s expense, with all standards, laws, statutes, restrictions, ordinances, requirements, and regulations (collectively “laws”), including, but not limited to those issued by County in its governmental capacity and all other laws applicable to the services at the time services are provided to and accepted by County. Subrecipient acknowledges that County is relying on Subrecipient to ensure such compliance, and pursuant to the requirements of paragraph “Z” below, Subrecipient agrees that it shall defend, indemnify and hold County and County Indemnitees (defined below) harmless from all liability, damages, costs and expenses arising from or related to a violation of such laws.

U. Intentionally left blank
V. Severability: If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Contract is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby.

W. Attorney Fees: In any action or proceeding to enforce or interpret any provision of this Contract, each party shall bear their own attorney’s fees, costs and expenses.

X. Interpretation: This Contract has been negotiated at arm’s length and between persons sophisticated and knowledgeable in the matters dealt with in this Contract. In DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 14 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
addition, each party had been represented by experienced and knowledgeable independent legal counsel of their own choosing or has knowingly declined to seek such counsel despite being encouraged and given the opportunity to do so. Each party further acknowledges that they have not been influenced to any extent whatsoever in executing this Contract by any other party hereto or by any person representing them, or both.

Accordingly, any rule or law (including California Civil Code Section 1654) or legal decision that would require interpretation of any ambiguities in this Contract against the party that has drafted it is not applicable and is waived. The provisions of this Contract shall be interpreted in a reasonable manner to effect the purpose of the parties and this Contract.

Y. Employee Eligibility Verification: The Subrecipient warrants that it fully complies with all Federal and State statutes and regulations regarding the employment of aliens and others and that all its employees performing work under this Contract meet the citizenship or alien status requirement set forth in Federal statutes and regulations. The Subrecipient shall obtain, from all employees performing work hereunder, all verification and other documentation of employment eligibility status required by Federal or State statutes and regulations including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 U.S.C. §1324 et seq., as they currently exist and as they may be hereafter amended. The Subrecipient shall retain all such documentation for all covered employees for the period prescribed by the law. The Subrecipient shall indemnify, defend with counsel approved in writing by County, and hold harmless, the County, and its County Indemnitees, its agents, officers, and employees from employer sanctions and any other liability which may be assessed against the Subrecipient or the County or County Indemnitees, any combination of the three in connection with any alleged violation of any Federal or State statutes or regulations pertaining to the eligibility for employment of any persons performing work under this Contract.

Z. Indemnification: Subrecipient agrees to indemnify, defend with counsel approved in writing by County, and hold County, its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents and those special districts and agencies which County’s Board of Supervisors acts as the governing Board (“County Indemnitees”) harmless from any claims, demands or liability of any kind or nature, including but not limited to personal injury or property damage, arising from or related to the services, products or other performance provided by Subrecipient pursuant to this Contract. If judgment is entered against Subrecipient and County by a court of competent jurisdiction because of the concurrent active negligence of County or County Indemnitees, Subrecipient and County agree that liability will be apportioned as determined by the court. Neither party shall request a jury apportionment.

AA. Audits/Inspections: Subrecipient agrees to permit the County’s Auditor-Controller or the Auditor-Controller’s authorized representative (including auditors from a private auditing firm hired by the County) access during normal working hours to all books, accounts, records, reports, files, financial records, supporting documentation, including payroll and accounts payable/receivable records, and other papers or property of Subrecipient for the purpose of auditing or inspecting any aspect of performance under this Contract. The inspection and/or audit will be confined to those matters connected with the performance of the Contract including, but not limited to, the costs of DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 15 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
administering the Contract. The County will provide reasonable notice of such an audit or inspection.

The County reserves the right to audit and verify the Subrecipient’s records before final payment is made.

Subrecipient agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated under this Contract or by law. Subrecipient agrees to allow interviews of any employees or others who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, Subrecipient agrees to include a similar right to the County to audit records and interview staff of any subcontractor related to performance of this Contract.

Should the Subrecipient cease to exist as a legal entity, the Subrecipient’s records pertaining to this Contract shall be forwarded to the County’s Project Manager.

BB. Contingency of Funds: Subrecipient acknowledges that funding or portions of funding for this Contract may be contingent upon State budget approval; receipt of funds from, and/or obligation of funds by, the State of California to County; receipt of funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”), and inclusion of sufficient funding for the services hereunder in the budget approved by County’s Board of Supervisors for each fiscal year covered by this Contract. If such approval, funding or appropriations are not forthcoming, or are otherwise limited, County may immediately terminate or modify this Contract without penalty.

CC.Expenditure Limit: The Subrecipient shall notify the County of Orange assigned Contract Administrator in writing when the expenditures against the Contract reach 75 percent of the dollar limit on the Contract. The County will not be responsible for any expenditure overruns and will not pay for work exceeding the dollar limit on the Contract unless a written and approved change order to cover those costs has been issued.

Board of Supervisor approval may be required.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 16 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Additional Terms and Conditions:

1. Scope of Contract: This Contract specifies the contractual terms and conditions by which the County will procure Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, H.R. 748 / Community Development Block Grant / Public Facilities & Improvements/ City of Stanton Community Center Improvements from Subrecipient as further detailed in the Scope of Services, identified and incorporated herein by this reference as “Attachment A”.

2. Term of Contract: This Contract shall commence on January 25, 2023 and continue through August 31, 2023, unless otherwise terminated by the County.

3. Renewal: This Contract may not be renewed.

4. Maximum Obligation:

The total Maximum Obligation of County to the Subrecipient for the cost of services provided in accordance with this Contract is $500,000, with individual Maximum Obligation budgets for each Fiscal Year as further detailed in the Budget Schedule, identified and incorporated herein by this reference as Attachment “C”.

5. Amendments - Changes/Extra Work: The Subrecipient shall make no changes to this Contract without the County’s written consent. In the event that there are new or unforeseen requirements, the County has the discretion with the Subrecipient’s concurrence, to make changes at any time without changing the scope or price of the Contract.

If County-initiated changes or changes in laws or government regulations affect price, the Subrecipient’s ability to deliver services, or the project schedule, the Subrecipient will give County written notice no later ten (10) days from the date the law or regulation went into effect or the date the change was proposed and Subrecipient was notified of the change. Such changes shall be agreed to in writing and incorporated into a Contract amendment. Said amendment shall be issued by the County-assigned Contract Administrator, shall require the mutual consent of all Parties, and may be subject to approval by the County Board of Supervisors. Nothing herein shall prohibit the Subrecipient from proceeding with the work as originally set forth or as previously amended in this Contract.

6. Breach of Contract: The failure of the Subrecipient to comply with any of the provisions, covenants or conditions of this Contract shall be a material breach of this Contract. In such event the County may, and in addition to any other remedies available at law, in equity, or otherwise specified in this Contract:
a) Terminate the Contract immediately, pursuant to Section K herein; b) Afford the Subrecipient written notice of the breach and ten (10) calendar days or such shorter time that may be specified in this Contract within which to cure the breach;
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 17 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
c) Discontinue payment to the Subrecipient for and during the period in which the Subrecipient is in breach; and
Offset against any monies billed by the Subrecipient but yet unpaid by the County those monies disallowed pursuant to the above.

7. Conditions Affecting Work:

The Subrecipient shall be responsible for taking all steps reasonably necessary, to ascertain the nature and location of the work to be performed under this Contract; and to know the general conditions which can affect the work or the cost thereof. Any failure by the Subrecipient to do so will not relieve Subrecipient from responsibility for successfully performing the work without additional cost to the County. The County assumes no responsibility for any understanding or representations concerning the nature, location(s) or general conditions made by any of its officers or agents prior to the execution of this Contract, unless such understanding or representations by the County are expressly stated in the Contract.

8. Civil Rights: Subrecipient attests that services provided shall be in accordance with the provisions of Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 as amended; Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and other applicable State and Federal laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, ethnic group identification, age, religion, marital status, sex or disability.

9. Conflict of Interest – Subrecipient’s Personnel: The Subrecipient shall exercise reasonable care and diligence to prevent any actions or conditions that could result in a conflict with the best interests of the County. This obligation shall apply to the Subrecipient; the Subrecipient’s employees, agents, and subcontractors associated with accomplishing work and services hereunder. The Subrecipient’s efforts shall include, but not be limited to establishing precautions to prevent its employees, agents, and subcontractors from providing or offering gifts, entertainment, payments, loans or other considerations which could be deemed to influence or appear to influence County staff or elected officers from acting in the best interests of the County.

10.Conflict of Interest – County Personnel: The County of Orange Board of Supervisors policy prohibits its employees from engaging in activities involving a conflict of interest.

The Subrecipient shall not, during the period of this Contract, employ any County employee for any purpose.

11.Consulting Contract – Follow-On Work:

No person, firm, subsidiary or subcontractor of a firm that has been awarded a consulting services contract or a contract which includes a consulting component may be awarded a Contract for the performance of services, the purchase of goods or supplies, or the provision of any other related action which arises from or can reasonably be deemed an end-product of work performed under the initial consulting to consulting-related Contract.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 18 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

12.Project Manager, County:

The County shall appoint a Project Manager to act as liaison between the County and the Subrecipient during the term of this Contract. The County’s Project Manager shall coordinate the activities of the County staff assigned to work with the Subrecipient.

The County’s Project Manager, in consultation and agreement with the County, shall have the right to require the removal and replacement of the Subrecipient’s Project Manager and key personnel. The County’s Project Manager shall notify the Subrecipient in writing of such action. The Subrecipient shall accomplish the removal within three (3) business days after written notice from the County’s Project Manager.

The County’s Project Manager shall review and approve the appointment of the replacement for the Subrecipient’s Project Manager and key personnel. Said approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. The County is not required to provide any additional information, reason or rationale in the event it requires the removal of Subrecipient’s Project Manager from providing further services under the Contract.

13.Subrecipient’s Project Manager and Key Personnel: Subrecipient shall appoint a Project Manager to direct the Subrecipient’s efforts in fulfilling Subrecipient’s obligations under this Contract. This Project Manager shall be subject to approval by the County and shall not be changed without the written consent of the County’s Project Manager, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.

The Subrecipient’s Project Manager, in consultation and agreement with County, shall be assigned to this project for the duration of the Contract and shall diligently pursue all work and services to meet the project time lines. The County’s Project Manager shall have the right to require the removal and replacement of the Subrecipient’s Project Manager from providing services to the County under this Contract. The County’s Project Manager shall notify the Subrecipient in writing of such action. The Subrecipient shall accomplish the removal within five (5) business days after written notice by the County’s Project Manager. The County’s Project Manager shall review and approve the appointment of the replacement for the Subrecipient’s Project Manager. The County is not required to provide any additional information, reason or rationale in the event it The County is not required to provide any additional information, reason or rationale in the event it requires the removal of Subrecipient’s Project Manager from providing further services under the Contract.

14.Subrecipient Personnel – Reference Checks: The Subrecipient warrants that all persons employed to provide service under this Contract have satisfactory past work records indicating their ability to adequately perform the work under this Contract.

Subrecipient’s employees assigned to this project must meet character standards as demonstrated by background investigation and reference checks, coordinated by the agency/department issuing this Contract.

15.Data – Title To: All materials, documents, data or information obtained from the County data files or any County medium furnished to the Subrecipient in the performance of this Contract will at all times remain the property of the County. Such data or information may not be used or copied for direct or indirect use by the Subrecipient after completion or termination of this Contract without the express written consent of the County. All DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 19 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
materials, documents, data or information, including copies, must be returned to the County at the end of this Contract.

16.Licenses: At its own expense, Subrecipient and its subcontractors, if any, shall, at all time during the term of this Contract, maintain in full force and effect such licenses or permits as may be required by the State of California or any other government entity.

Subrecipient and his subcontractors, if any, shall strictly adhere to, and obey, all governmental rules and regulations now in effect or as subsequently enacted or modified, as promulgated by any local, State, or Federal governmental entity.

17.Disputes – Contract:

A. The parties shall deal in good faith and attempt to resolve potential disputes informally. If the dispute concerning a question of fact arising under the terms of this Contract is not disposed of in a reasonable period of time by the Subrecipient’s Project Manager and the County‘s Project Manager, such matter shall be brought to the attention of the Contract Administrator by way of the following process:

1. The Subrecipient shall submit to the agency/department assigned Contract Administrator a written demand for a final decision regarding the disposition of any dispute between the parties arising under, related to, or involving this Contract, unless the County, on its own initiative, has already rendered such a final decision.

2. The Subrecipient’s written demand shall be fully supported by factual information, and, if such demand involves a cost adjustment to the Contract, the Subrecipient shall include with the demand a written statement signed by a senior official indicating that the demand is made in good faith, that the supporting data are accurate and complete, and that the amount requested accurately reflects the Contract adjustment for which the Subrecipient believes the County is liable.

B. Pending the final resolution of any dispute arising under, related to, or involving this Contract, the Subrecipient agrees to diligently proceed with the performance of this Contract, including the delivery of goods and/or provision of services. The Subrecipient’s failure to diligently proceed shall be considered a material breach of this Contract.

Any final decision of the County shall be expressly identified as such, shall be in writing, and shall be signed by the Director. If the County fails to render a decision within 90 days after receipt of the Subrecipient’s demand, it shall be deemed a final decision adverse to the Subrecipient’s contentions. Nothing in this section shall be construed as affecting the County’s right to terminate the Contract for cause or termination for convenience as stated in Section K herein.

18.EDD Independent Subrecipient Reporting Requirements: Effective January 1, 2001, the County of Orange is required to file in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 6041A of the Internal Revenue Code for services received from a “service DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 20 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
provider” to whom the County pays $600 or more or with whom the County enters into a contract for $600 or more within a single calendar year. The purpose of this reporting requirement is to increase child support collection by helping to locate parents who are delinquent in their child support obligations.

The term “service provider” is defined in California Unemployment Insurance Code Section 1088.8, Subparagraph B.2 as “an individual who is not an employee of the service recipient for California purposes and who received compensation or executes a contract for services performed for that service recipient within or without the State.” The term is further defined by the California Employment Development Department to refer specifically to independent Subrecipients. An independent Subrecipient is defined as “an individual who is not an employee of the ... government entity for California purposes and who receives compensation or executes a contract for services performed for that ... government entity either in or outside of California.” The reporting requirement does not apply to corporations, general partnerships, limited liability partnerships, and limited liability companies.

Additional information on this reporting requirement can be found at the California Employment Development Department web site located at
http://www.edd.ca.gov/Employer_Services.htm

19.Emergency/Declared Disaster Requirements: In the event of an emergency or if Orange County is declared a disaster area by the County, State or Federal government, this Contract may be subjected to unusual usage. The Subrecipient shall service the County during such an emergency or declared disaster under the same terms and conditions that apply during non-emergency/disaster conditions. The pricing quoted by the Subrecipient shall apply to serving the County’s needs regardless of the circumstances. If the Subrecipient is unable to supply the goods/services under the terms of the Contract, then the Subrecipient shall provide proof of such disruption and a copy of the invoice for the goods/services from the Subrecipient’s supplier(s). Additional profit margin as a result of supplying goods/services during an emergency or a declared disaster shall not be permitted. In the event of an emergency or declared disaster, emergency purchase order numbers will be assigned. All applicable invoices from the Subrecipient shall show both the emergency purchase order number and the Contract number.

20.Errors and Omissions: All reports, files and other documents prepared and submitted by Subrecipient shall be complete and shall be carefully checked by the professional(s) identified by Subrecipient as Project Manager and key personnel attached hereto, prior to submission to the County. Subrecipient agrees that County review is discretionary and Subrecipient shall not assume that the County will discover errors and/or omissions.

If the County discovers any errors or omissions prior to approving Subrecipient’s reports, files and other written documents, the reports, files or documents will be returned to Subrecipient for correction. Should the County or others discover errors or omissions in the reports, files or other written documents submitted by the Subrecipient after County approval thereof, County approval of Subrecipient’s reports, files or documents shall not be used as a defense by Subrecipient in any action between the County and DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 21 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Subrecipient, and the reports, files or documents will be returned to Subrecipient for correction.

21.Non-Supplantation of Funds:

Subrecipient shall not supplant any Federal, State, or County funds intended for the purposes of this Contract with any funds made available under this Contract. Subrecipient shall not claim reimbursement from County for, or apply sums received from County with respect to, that portion of its obligations which have been paid by another source of revenue. Subrecipient agrees that it shall not use funds received pursuant to this Contract, either directly or indirectly, as a contribution or compensation for the purposes of obtaining Federal, State, or County funds under any Federal, State, or County program without prior written approval from the County.

22.Satisfactory Work: Services rendered hereunder are to be performed to the written satisfaction of County. County’s staff will interpret all reports and determine the quality, acceptability and progress of the services rendered.

23.Access and Records:

A. County, the State of California and the United States Government and/or their representatives, shall have access, for purposes of monitoring, auditing, and examining, to Subrecipient’s activities, books, documents and papers (including computer records and emails) and to records of Subrecipient’s subcontractors, consultants, contracted employees, bookkeepers, accountants, employees and participants related to this Contract. Subrecipient shall insert this condition in each Contract between Subrecipient and a subcontractor that is pursuant to this Contract shall require the subcontractor to agree to this condition. Such departments or representatives shall have the right to make excerpts, transcripts and photocopies of such records and to schedule on site monitoring at their discretion. Monitoring activities also may include, but are not limited to, questioning employees and participants and entering any premises or onto any site in which any of the services or activities funded hereunder are conducted or in which any of the records of Subrecipient are kept. Subrecipient shall make available its books, documents, papers, financial records, etc., within three (3) days after receipt of written demand by Director which shall be deemed received upon date of sending. In the event Subrecipient does not make the above referenced documents available within the County of Orange, California, Subrecipient agrees to pay all necessary and reasonable expenses incurred by County, or County’s designee, in conducting any audit at the location where said records and books of account are maintained.

B. Records Retention. All accounting records and evidence pertaining to all costs of Subrecipient and all documents related to this Contract shall be kept available at Subrecipient’s office or place of business for the duration of this Contract and thereafter for five (5) years after completion of an audit. Records which relate to:
(1) complaints, claims, administrative proceedings or litigation arising out of the performance of this Contract; or (2) costs and expenses of this Contract to which DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 22 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
County or any other governmental department takes exception, shall be retained beyond the five (5) years until final resolution or disposition of such appeals, litigation, claims, or exceptions.

C. Liability. Subrecipient shall pay to County the full amount of County’s liability to the State or Federal government or any department thereof resulting from any disallowance or other audit exceptions to the extent that such liability is attributable to Subrecipient’s failure to perform under this Contract.

24.Signature in Counterparts: The Parties agree that separate copies of this Contract and/or electronic signatures and handwritten signatures may be signed by each of the Parties, and this Contract will have the same force and effect as if the Original had been signed by all the Parties.

25.Reports/Meetings: The Subrecipient shall develop reports and any other relevant documents necessary to complete the services and requirements as set forth in this contract. The County’s Project Manager and the Subrecipient’s Project Manager will meet on reasonable notice to discuss the Subrecipient’s performance and progress under this Contract. If requested, the Subrecipient’s Project Manager and other project personnel shall attend all meetings. The Subrecipient shall provide such information that is requested by the County for the purpose of monitoring progress under this Contract.

26.Subcontracting: No performance of this Contract or any portion thereof may be subcontracted by the Subrecipient without the express written consent of the County.

Any attempt by the Subrecipient to subcontract any performance of this Contract without the express written consent of the County shall be invalid and shall constitute a breach of this Contract.

In the event that the Subrecipient is authorized by the County to subcontract, this Contract shall take precedence over the terms of the Contract between Subrecipient and subcontractor, and shall incorporate by reference the terms of this Contract. The County shall look to the Subrecipient for performance and indemnification and not deal directly with any subcontractor. All work performed by a subcontractor must meet the approval of the County of Orange.

27.Equal Employment Opportunity: The Subrecipient shall comply with U.S. Executive Order 11246 entitled, “Equal Employment Opportunity” as amended by Executive Order 11375 and as supplemented in Department of Labor regulations (41 CFR, Part 60) and applicable State of California regulations as may now exist or be amended in the future.

The Subrecipient shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, national origin, ancestry, religion, sex, marital status, political affiliation or physical or mental condition.

Regarding handicapped persons, the Subrecipient will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of physical or mental handicap in regard to any position for which the employee or applicant for employment is qualified. The Subrecipient agrees to provide equal opportunity to handicapped persons in employment or in advancement in employment or otherwise treat qualified handicapped DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 23 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
individuals without discrimination based upon their physical or mental handicaps in all employment practices such as the following: employment, upgrading, promotions, transfers, recruitments, advertising, layoffs, terminations, rate of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The Subrecipient agrees to comply with the provisions of Sections 503 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, pertaining to prohibition of discrimination against qualified handicapped persons in all programs and/or activities as detailed in regulations signed by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services effective June 3, 1977, and found in the Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 68 dated May 4, 1977, as may now exist or be amended in the future.

Regarding Americans with disabilities, Subrecipient agrees to comply with applicable provisions of Title 1 of the Americans with Disabilities Act enacted in 1990 as may now exist or be amended in the future.

28.Gratuities: The Subrecipient warrants that no gratuities, in the form of entertainment, gifts or otherwise, were offered or given by the Subrecipient or any agent or representative of the Subrecipient to any officer or employee of the County with a view toward securing the Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect to any determinations concerning the performance of the Contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the County shall have the right to terminate the Contract, either in whole or in part, and any loss or damage sustained by the County in procuring on the open market any goods or services which the Subrecipient agreed to supply shall be borne and paid for by the Subrecipient. The rights and remedies of the County provided in the clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under the Contract.

29.News/Information Release: The Subrecipient agrees that it will not issue any news releases in connection with either the award of this Contract or any subsequent amendment of or effort under this Contract without first obtaining review and written approval of said news releases from the County through the County’s Project Manager.

30.Notices: Any and all notices, requests demands and other communications contemplated, called for, permitted, or required to be given hereunder shall be in writing, except through the course of the Parties routine exchange of information and cooperation during the terms of the work and services. Any written communications shall be deemed to have been duly given upon actual in-person delivery, if delivery is by direct hand, or upon delivery on the actual day of receipt or no greater than four calendar days after being mailed by US certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, whichever occurs first. The date of mailing shall count as the first day. All communications shall be addressed to the appropriate party at the address stated herein or such other address as the parties hereto may designate by written notice from time to time in the manner aforesaid.

For County:

OC Community Resources OC Community Resources
Housing and Community Development Contract Development and Management Project Manager Contract Administrator
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 24 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
1501 East St. Andrew Place, 1st Floor 601 N. Ross St., 6th Floor Santa Ana, CA 92705-4930 Santa Ana, CA 92701
For Subrecipient:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Ave.

Stanton, CA 90680
Attn: Project Manager

31.Ownership of Documents: The County has permanent ownership of all directly connected and derivative materials produced under this Contract by the Subrecipient.

All documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or materials furnished hereunder shall become and remains the sole property of the County and may be used by the County as it may require without additional cost to the County. None of the documents, reports and other incidental or derivative work or furnished materials shall be used by the Subrecipient without the express written consent of the County.

32.Precedence: The Contract documents consist of this Contract and its exhibits and attachments. In the event of a conflict between or among the Contract documents, the order of precedence shall be the provisions of the main body of this Contract, i.e., those provisions set forth in the recitals and articles of this Contract, and then the exhibits and attachments.

33.Termination – Orderly: After receipt of a termination notice from the County of Orange, the Subrecipient may submit to the County a termination claim, if applicable. Such claim shall be submitted promptly, but in no event later than 60 days from the effective date of the termination, unless one or more extensions in writing are granted by the County upon written request of the Subrecipient. Upon termination County agrees to pay the Subrecipient for all services performed prior to termination which meet the requirements of the Contract, provided, however, that such compensation combined with previously paid compensation shall not exceed the total compensation set forth in the Contract.

Upon termination or other expiration of this Contract, each party shall promptly return to the other party all papers, materials, and other properties of the other held by each for purposes of performance of the Contract.

34.County Branding Requirements – Publicity, Literature, Advertisement and Social Media:

A. County owns all rights to the name, logos, and symbols of County. The use and/or reproduction of County’s name, logos, or symbols for any purpose, including commercial advertisement, promotional purposes, announcements, displays, or press releases, without County’s prior written consent is expressly prohibited.

B. Subrecipient may develop and publish information related to this Contract where all of the following conditions are satisfied:

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 25 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

1. Contract Administrator/assigned Deputy Purchasing Agent provides its written approval of the content and publication of the information at least 30 days prior to Contractor publishing the information, unless a different timeframe for approval is agreed upon by the Contract Administrator/assigned Deputy Purchasing Agent;

2. Unless directed otherwise by Contract Administrator/assigned Deputy Purchasing Agent, the information includes a statement that the program, wholly or in part, is funded through County, State and Federal government funds [funds identified as applicable];

3. The information does not give the appearance that the County, its officers, employees, or agencies endorse:
a. any commercial product or service; and,
b. any product or service provided by Subrecipient, unless approved in writing by Contract Administrator/assigned Deputy Purchasing Agent; and,

4. If Subrecipient uses social media (such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube or other publicly available social media sites) to publish information related to this Contract, Subrecipient shall develop social media policies and procedures and have them available to the Contract Administrator/assigned Deputy Purchasing Agent. Subrecipient shall comply with County Social Media Use Policy and Procedures as they pertain to any social media developed in support of the services described within this Contract. The policy is available on the Internet at http://www.ocgov.com/gov/ceo/cio/govpolicies.

THE REMAINDER OF THE PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 26 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Program Specific Terms and Conditions:

35.Debarment: Subrecipient certifies that it is not debarred or suspended or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal/State assistance programs in accordance with 29 CFR Part 98.

36.Lobbying:

A. Subrecipient shall complete and immediately forward to the County the “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 4 and incorporated herein by this reference, if subrecipient, or any person, firm or corporation acting on Subrecipient’s behalf, engaged or engages in lobbying any federal office, employee, elected official or agency with respect to this Contract or funds to be received by subrecipient pursuant to this Contract.

B. Subrecipient agrees that the funds provided herein shall not be used to promote, directly or indirectly, any political party, political candidate or political activity, except as permitted by law.

37.Fraud: Subrecipient shall immediately report all suspected or known instances and facts concerning possible fraud, abuse or criminal activity under this Contract.

Subrecipient shall inform staff and the general public of how to report fraud, waste or abuse through appropriate postings of incident reporting notice. The County’s AntiFraud Program can be accessed through:
http://ocgov.com/gov/risk/programs/antifraud.

38.Fiscal Accountability:

A. Financial Management System: Subrecipient shall establish and maintain a sound financial management system, based upon generally accepted accounting principles. Subrecipient’s system shall provide fiscal control and accounting procedures that will include the following:
i. Information pertaining to the line items as identified in Attachment C to this Contract;
ii. Source documentation to support accounting records; and iii. Proper charging of costs and cost allocation.

B. Subrecipient’s Record: Subrecipient’s records shall be sufficient to:
i. Permit preparation of required reports;
ii. Permit tracking of funds to a level of expenditure adequate to establish that funds have not been used in violation of the applicable restrictions on the use of such funds;
iii. Permit the tracking of program income, or profits earned, and any costs incurred (such as stand-in costs) that are otherwise allowable except for; and iv. Permit tracking and reporting of leveraging as required.

C. Costs Charged: Cost shall be charged to this Contract only in accordance with the County and other requirements as required by funding source(s).

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 27 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

39.Performance Standards: Subrecipient shall comply with and adhere to the performance accountability standards as described in this Contract and applicable regulations and the activity levels to be utilized by County for program evaluation and monitoring included, but not limited to those listed in the Attachment E-Performance Standards attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

40.Budget Schedule: Subrecipient agrees that the expenditures of any and all funds under this Contract will be in accordance with the Budget Schedule, a copy of which is attached hereto as Attachment C, and which by this reference is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as if fully set forth.

41.Payment Requirements:

If funding levels are significantly affected by state or federal budget and funds are not allocated and available for the continuance of the function performed by Subrecipient, the Contract may be terminated by the County at the end of the period for which funds are available. The County shall notify Subrecipient at the earliest possible time of any service, which will or may be affected by a shortage of funds. No penalty shall accrue to the County in the event this provision is exercised and the County shall not be obligated nor liable for any damages as a result of termination under this provision of this Contract, and nothing herein shall be construed as obligating the County to expend or as involving the County in any Contract or other obligation for future payment of money in excess of appropriations authorized by law.

A. Contract Amount: It is expressly agreed and understood that the total amount to be paid by County under this Contract shall not exceed the total County funding as set forth in Attachment B-Payment/Compensation to Subrecipient attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

B. County will reclaim any unused balance of funds for reallocation to other County approved projects.

C. Payment of Project Activities:

1. Payment of Project Activities: County will reimburse Subrecipient for eligible project-related costs only. Subrecipient shall submit requests for reimbursement to County on a monthly basis beginning on February 1, 2023, and must provide adequate documentation as required by County in accordance with the OC Community Resources Contract
Reimbursement Policy, as set forth in Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In addition, Subrecipient will provide a progress Grantee Performance Report (“GPR Information Form”) for the time period covered, as prescribed by County. Failure to provide any of the required documentation and reporting will cause County to withhold all or a portion of a request for reimbursement, or return the entire reimbursement package to Subrecipient, until such documentation and reporting has been received and approved by County.

2. If Subrecipient has no request for reimbursement during any quarter during the term of this Contract, a GPR Information Form, including and DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 28 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
explanation as to why no invoices were being processed, shall be required in lieu of a request for reimbursement.

3. The following “Required Expenditure Threshold” criteria have been established to guide the Subrecipient in structuring and scheduling their expenditure of funds received through this Contract, through term of Contract. The criteria thresholds are consistent with the criteria used by OC Community Resources to determine performance including, but not limited to, determinations of future award of funds, additional funding requests and/or determinations for the recapture of funding. *Milestone Date Minimum Required Expenditure Threshold
May 31, 2023 70% of Contracted Amount Expended
June 30, 2023 80% of Contracted Amount Expended
Failure to achieve at least the aforementioned 50% drawdown, without extenuating circumstances, may cause any remaining balance in this Contract to be reclaimed by County, and will negatively affect future funding to Subrecipient. Failure to achieve the aforementioned 80% drawdown goal, without written exception approved by the Director, may cause any remaining balance in this Contract to be reclaimed by County, and will impact future funding to Subrecipient

4. Subrecipient will have fifteen (15) days following the expiration of the Contract to submit outstanding invoices for reimbursement of eligible costs incurred during the Contract period. After the fifteen (15) day period for submitting invoices has expired, County shall reallocate the remaining balance under this Contract for other program purposes and Subrecipient shall be ineligible for any further reimbursement D.

D. Funds shall not be disbursed for any costs incurred prior to the certification by County and/or HUD of Certificate(s) of Insurance as further defined in Paragraph O “Insurance Requirements” of this Contract.

E. Eligible costs related to services provided by Subrecipient must be incurred during the period beginning January 25, 2023. The Project shall be completed, and all funds provided through this Contract shall be expended on eligible Project activities through and including August 31, 2023.

F. County and Participating Cities previously entered into a Cooperation Agreement effective July 1, 2022 as amended, in which both Parties agreed to cooperate in the undertaking, or assist in the undertaking, of community development and housing assistance activities.

G. Metropolitan Cities with populations of over 50,000, are eligible to participate in the Community Planning and Development (“CPD”) program funds directly from HUD and have opted to participate in the CPD programs through the County’s Urban County Program as a metropolitan city.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 29 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

42.Modification of Budget: Upon written approval of County, Subrecipient shall have the authority to transfer allocated program funds from one category of the overall program Budget to another category of the overall Budget. No such transfer may be made without the express prior written approval of County. A modification of the Budget may include the addition of any new Budget category.

43.Annual Audit: If Subrecipient expends Federal funds in a fiscal year which equal or exceed $750,000 (seven hundred fifty thousand dollars) as specified in 2 CFR Part 200.500- Subpart F-Audit Requirements, Subrecipient shall cause an audit to be prepared by a Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) who is a member in good standing with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) of the California Society of CPA’s. The audit must be performed annually in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (“GAAS”) authorized by the AICPA and Federal laws and regulations governing the programs in which it participates.

Furthermore, County retains the right to require Subrecipient to submit similarly prepared audit at Subrecipient’s expense even in instances when Subrecipient’s expenditure is less than $750,000. Subrecipient will be required to identify corrective action taken in response to any findings identified by CPA related to their funded activity or program.

Subrecipient will ensure an annual financial audit is performed in compliance with the Federal Single Audit Act and will submit two (2) copies of such audit report, including a copy of the management letter, to County within six (6) months of the end of each Contract year in which Subrecipient has received federal funding (i.e., July 1 – June 30).

Failure to meet this requirement may result in County denying reimbursement of funds to Subrecipient, as well as future funding qualification. Subrecipients, which are exempt from statutory audit requirements, shall maintain records, which are available for review by County or Federal officials. Subrecipient acknowledges that any and all “Financial Statements” submitted to County pursuant to this Contract become public records and are subject to public inspection pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Section 6250 et seq. of the California Government).

44.UEI and D-U-N-S Numbers and Related Information: UEI and D-U-N-S Numbers: A unique, non-indicative 12-and 9 digit identifiers issued and maintained by SAM.gov and the Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) that verifies the existence of a business entity. The UEI and D-U-N-S Numbers are needed to coordinate with the System for Award Management (SAM) that combines federal procurement systems and the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance into one new system. https://www.SAM.gov The UEI and D-U-N-S Numbers must be provided to County prior to the execution of this Contract. Subrecipient shall ensure all UEI and D-U-N-S information is up to date and the UEI and D-U-N-S Numbers status is “active,” prior to execution of this Contract.

If County cannot access the Subrecipient’s UEI and D-U-N-S information related to this federal sub award on the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Sub Award Reporting System (SAM.GOV) due to errors in the Subrecipient’s data entry for its UEI and D-U-N-S Numbers, the Subrecipient must immediately update the information as required.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 30 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
If County cannot access the Subrecipient’s UEI and D-U-N-S information related to this federal sub award on the Federal Funding Accounting and Transparency Act Sub Award Reporting System (SAM.GOV) due to errors in the Subrecipient’s data entry for its UEI and D-U-N-S Numbers, the Subrecipient must immediately update the information as required.

The County reserves the right to verify and validate any information prior to contract award and during the entire term of the Contract.

45.Program Income:

A. Subrecipient shall comply with regulations, as well as all applicable State or County regulations concerning the reporting and payment procedures for program income.

B. Definition: “Program Income” means, as provided by 24 CFR § 570.504, gross income received by the Subrecipient directly generated by a grant supported activity, or earned only as a result of the grant agreement during the grant period.

C. Use. The Subrecipient shall use all income received from said funds only for the same purposes for which said funds may be expended pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Contract.

D. All Program Income accrued shall be returned to County on a quarterly basis prior to Subrecipient receiving any reimbursement from grant funds provided under this Contract.

E. Subrecipient shall provide information of the receipt of Program Income by Subrecipient related to this Contract on all GPR Information Forms submitted with requests for reimbursement.

F. Subrecipient shall complete and submit a Year-End Program Income letter, indicating amount of Program Income and include any reimbursement remittance necessitated therein, by July 15, after the close of the Contract fiscal year.

46.Performance:

A. Subrecipient shall provide the oversight, administration, and project management necessary to accomplish all contracted activities in a timely manner. Subrecipient also agrees to comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and regulations governing the funds provided under this Contract.

B. Subrecipient shall comply with all applicable HUD regulations, as described in Paragraph 49 “Federal Administrative and Related Requirements” of this Contract, concerning administrative requirements and maintain records as to services provided and total number of persons served through the project, including but not limited to, population-served analysis (i.e., extremely-low income persons, very-low income persons, and low-income persons as defined DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 31 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
by HUD). Such information shall be available for periodic monitoring by representatives of County or HUD and shall be submitted by Subrecipient in report form to County by dates specified by County.

C. The following “Performance Threshold” criteria shall be used to assess the level of performance of the Subrecipient, including Attachment A — Scope of Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Furthermore, the criteria will be considered by OC Community Resources when determining future funding. In order to be considered in compliance with the performance threshold criteria, the Subrecipient must, on or before the required milestone date, submit to OC Community Resources a request for reimbursement which demonstrates that Subrecipient has expended funds and met their proposed accomplishment goals at the required levels, unless exempted in writing by the County.

D. Subrecipient shall complete and submit a Year End GPR Information Form by September 15, 2023, after the close of the Contract fiscal year.

E. Should the activity being funded through this Contract be completed, cancelled or terminated prior to the termination date set forth herein in Paragraph 2 “Term of Contract,” or if funds allocated through this Contract are fully expended, prior to end of Contract term, Subrecipient must continue to serve its clients for the entire term of this Contract. Subrecipient shall complete and submit a Mid-Year and Year End GPR Information Form at the time of the completion, cancellation or termination.

F. Subrecipient shall complete and submit a GPR Information Form in support of all requests for reimbursement. Said GPR Information Form shall consist of a cumulative report of project related accomplishments as set forth in Attachment A - Scope of Services, for the subject quarter. If at any time during the term of this Contract Subrecipient has no activity occuring during any quarter, Subrecipient shall prepare and submit to County a Quarterly GPR Information Form, regardless of actual activity.

G. Subrecipient acknowledges that the GPR Information Form is a monitoring tool that will be reviewed and evaluated to determine Subrecipient’s level of performance relative to this Contract.

H. Subrecipient shall submit all requested data necessary to complete the Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), and monitor program accountability and progress in accordance with HUD requirements, in the format and at the time designated by County.

I. Readiness – for Housing Rehabilitation and Public Facilities & Improvements Projects:

Subrecipient shall be required to demonstrate to County its readiness to immediately initiate its Project upon execution of this Contract by providing to the County documentation including, but not limited to, the following: Board or Council Minutes/Resolution; Awarded bid documents with timeline requirements; and, executed Architect and Engineer (hereafter referred to as “A&E”) contracts DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 32 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
with specific project timelines consistent with funding. By July 30 of Contract term, Subrecipient shall provide County a Project Readiness Checklist incorporating the status of all Project-phasing milestones. In the case of milestones not yet reached, Subrecipient shall provide projected target dates for when said milestones would be met. The Project Readiness Checklist shall clearly demonstrate that Subrecipient will meet the “Minimum Required Expenditure Thresholds” as set forth in this Paragraph 47.C. Subrecipient acknowledges that said Project Readiness Checklist may be considered to evaluate the performance of the Subrecipient.

47.Performance Monitoring:

A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives.

B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring.

County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient.

C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract.

D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

48.Federal Administrative and Related Requirements: Subrecipient must comply with all federal requirements as it pertains for 24 CFR Parts 91 and 570. Subrecipient acknowledges that administration of its operation and services are subject to the requirements as established in 2 CFR Part 200, et al. Subrecipient shall procure all materials, property, or services in accordance with the requirements of 2 CFR § 200.318-326.

A. Financial Management:

1. Accounting Standards
Subrecipient agrees to comply with 24 CFR 84.21-28 and agrees to adhere to the accounting principles and procedures required therein, utilize adequate internal controls, and maintain necessary source documentation for all costs incurred.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 33 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

2. Cost Principles:

The Subrecipient shall administer its program in conformance with 2 CFR Part 200, et al; (and if Subrecipient is a governmental or quasigovernmental agency, the applicable sections of 24 CFR 85, “Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments,”) as applicable. These principles shall be applied for all costs incurred whether charged on a direct or indirect basis.

B. Documentation and Record Keeping

1. Records to be Maintained
Subrecipient shall maintain all records required by the Federal regulations specified in 24 CFR 570.506 that are pertinent to the activities to be funded under this Contract. Such records shall include, but not be limited to:
a. Records providing a full description of each activity undertaken; b. Records demonstrating that each activity undertaken meets the one of the National Objectives of the CDBG program;
c. Records required to determine the eligibility of activities; d. Records required to document the acquisition, improvement, use, or disposition of real property acquired or improved with CDBG assistance;
e. Records documenting compliance with the fair housing and equal opportunity components of the CDBG program;
f. Financial records as required by federal regulations 24 CFR 570.502, and 24 CFR 84.21-28; and
g. Other records necessary to document compliance with Subpart K of 23 CFR.

2. Retention
Subrecipient shall retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to this Contract for a period of five (5) years. The retention period begins on the date of the submission of the County’s annual performance and evaluation report to HUD in which the activities assisted under the Contract are reported on for the final time. Notwithstanding the above, if there is litigation, claims, audits, negotiations or other actions that involve any of the records cited and that have started before the expiration of the five-year period, then such records must be retained until completion of the actions and resolution of all issues, or the expiration of the five-year period, whichever occurs later.

3. Client Data
a. Subrecipient shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided for a period of five (5) years after the termination of all activities funded under this Contract, or after the DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 34 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
resolution of all Federal audit finding, whichever occurs later. Such data shall be consistent and include, but not limited to, client name, address, verifiable income level (as documented by income tax returns, employee payroll records, retirement statements, etc. or other third party documentation acceptable to County, for determining eligibility), and description of service provided. Such information shall be made available to HUD representatives, County monitors, or their designees, for review upon request. b. Subrecipient shall develop and implement procedures to ensure the confidentiality of records pertaining to any individual provided family violence prevention or treatment services under any project assisted under the subject program, including protection against the release of the address or location of any family violence shelter project, except with the written authorization of the person responsible for the operation of that shelter.

4. Disclosure
Subrecipient shall maintain client data demonstrating client eligibility for services provided. Such data shall include, but not be limited to, client name, address, income level or other basis for determining eligibility, and description of service provided. Such information shall be made available to County monitors or their designees for review upon request.

5. Close-Outs
Subrecipient’s obligation to County shall not end until all close-out requirements are completed. Activities during this close-out period shall be completed in accordance with federal and State regulations and shall include, but are not limited to: making final payments; submitting final invoice(s), report(s), in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 49, and documentation; disposing of program assets (including the return to County of all unused materials and equipment); remitting any program income balances and accounts receivable to County, and determining the custodianship of records. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the terms of this Contract shall remain in effect during any period that the Subrecipient has control over CDBG funds, including Program Income.

C. Personnel & Participation Conditions

1. Civil Rights
Compliance
Subrecipient agrees to comply with California Civil Rights Act Ordinances and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended, Section 104(b) and Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Executive Order 11063, and with Executive Order 11246, as amended by Executive Orders 11375, 11478, 12107 and 12086.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 35 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV

2. Nondiscrimination in Employment and Contracting
Subrecipient agrees to comply with the non-discrimination in employment and contracting opportunities laws, regulations, and executive orders referenced in 24 CFR 570.607, as revised by Executive Order 13279, including 24 CFR Part 8, 24 CFR 570.602 and Section 504 of Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Executive Order 11063. The applicable non-discrimination provisions in Section 109 of the Housing and Community Development Act (HCDA) are still applicable.

3. Affirmative Action:

Subrecipient agrees that it shall be committed to carry out an Affirmative Action Program that encompasses that principals provided in President’s Executive Order 11246, as revised on January 4, 2002.

4. Americans with Disabilities Act:

Subrecipient agrees to comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 as amended; Title VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended; Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 USC 12101; California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Title 22: California Government Code, Sections 11135, et seq; and other federal and state laws and executive orders prohibit discrimination. All programs, activities, employment opportunities, and services must be made available to all persons, including persons with disabilities.

5. Drug-Free Workplace:

The Subrecipient hereby certifies compliance with Government Code Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug-free workplace as set forth in Exhibit 2, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

The Subrecipient will:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a). b. Establish a drug-free awareness program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b) to inform employees about all of the following:
i. The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
ii. The Subrecipient’s policy of maintaining a drug free workplace;
iii. Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and
iv. Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Provide as required by Government Code Section 8355(c) that every employee who works under this Contract:
i. Will receive a copy of the company’s drug-free policy statement; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 36 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
ii. Will agree to abide by the terms of the company’s statement as a condition of employment under this Contract.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the contract or termination of the contract or both, and the Subrecipient may be ineligible for award of any future County contracts if the County determines that any of the following has occurred:
iii. The Subrecipient has made false certification, or
iv. The Subrecipient violates the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

6. Anti-Lobbying:

Subrecipient certifies that it will comply with federal law (31 U.S.C. 1352) and regulations found at 24 CFR Part 87, which provide that:
a. No federal appropriated funds will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any Cooperative Agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or Cooperative Agreement; and
b. Subrecipient shall include subject anti-lobbying certification in award documents for all sub-Subrecipients at all tiers (including sub-subcontracts, sub-subgrants, and contract under grants, loans, and Cooperative Agreements) and that all sub-Subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

7. Employment Restrictions:
a. Prohibited Activity:

Subrecipient is prohibited from using funds provided herein, or personnel employed in the administration of the program, for:
political activities, sectarian or religious activities, lobbying, political patronage, and nepotism activities.
b. OSHA:

Where employees are engaged in activities not covered under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, they shall not be required or permitted to work, be trained, or receive services in buildings or surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous to the participants’ health or safety.
c. Employee Rights
i. Federal Minimum Wage
Subrecipient must follow the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA), as it currently exists and it may be amended, which sets basic minimum wage and overtime pay standards.

These standards are enforced by The United States
Department of Wage and Hour Division under Department’s DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 37 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Wage and Hour Division. The Federal minimum wage
provisions are contained in the FLSA. Many states also
have minimum wage laws. In cases where an employee is
subject to both state and federal minimum wage laws, the employee is entitled to the higher minimum wage.
d. California Minimum Wage
i. Subrecipient must follow the California enacted legislation signed by the Governor of California, raising the minimum wage for all industries (MW-2007). (AB 1835, CH230, Stats of 2006, adding sections 1182.12 and 1182.13 to the
California Labor Code.) Pursuant to its authority under Labor Code section 1182.13, the Department of Industrial
Relations amends and republishes Sections, 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the General Minimum Wage Order. MW-2001, Section 4,
Separability, has not been changed. Consistent with this enactment, amendments are made to the minimum wage,
and the meals and lodging credits sections of all of the IWC’s industry and occupation orders. This summary must be
made available to employees in accordance with the IWC’s wage orders. Copies of the full text of the amended wage orders may be obtained by ordering on-line at
www.dir.ca.gov/WP.asp or by contacting your local Division of Labor Standards Enforcement office.
e. Hatch Act:

Subrecipient agrees that no funds provided, nor personnel employed under this Contract, shall be in any way or to any extent engaged in the conduct of political activities in violation of the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 1501 et seq. and Chapter 15 of Title V of the U.S.C.
f. Religious Organization/Activities:

In accordance with 24 CFR 570.200(j), Subrecipient shall not discriminate against faith-based organizations in administering its federal HUD activities. Subrecipient agrees that funds provided under this Contract will not be utilized for inherently religious activities prohibited by 24 CFR 570.200(j), such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization or to promote religious interest, or for the benefit of a religious organization.

8. Labor Standards
a. Subrecipient agrees to contact County no less than fourteen (14) days prior to the Pre-Construction Meeting date to seek consultation regarding application of requirements per federal labor standards regulations or Davis-Bacon related Acts.
b. Subrecipient will comply with Davis-Bacon Act and/or State Prevailing Wage requirements, when applicable.
c. Subrecipient agrees to comply with all applicable requirements of the Secretary of Labor in accordance with the Davis-Bacon Act, the provisions of Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, the DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 38 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. 276, 327-333), and all other applicable Federal, State and local laws and regulations pertaining to labor standards. Subrecipient shall maintain all applicable documentation, which demonstrates compliance with hour and wage requirements of this part. Such documentation shall be made available to County for review upon request.
d. Subrecipient agrees that, except with respect to the rehabilitation or construction of residential property designed for residential use for less than eight (8) units, all Subrecipients engaged in contracts of $2,000.00 or more for construction, renovation or repair of any building or work financed in whole or in part with assistance provided under this Contract, shall comply with all applicable federal requirements including Department of Labor regulations, under 29 CFR, Parts 3, 1, 5, 7 and 1926 governing the payment of wages and ratio of apprentices and trainees to journeymen.

Nothing hereunder is intended to relieve
e. Subrecipient of its obligation, if any, to require payment of the higher rate under state or local laws Subrecipient shall insert provisions meeting the requirements of this Paragraph in all such Contracts.

In case where the Davis-Bacon Act applies, Subrecipient agrees to submit the Construction Bid Package for this project to County for modification, Subrecipient shall construct project in accordance with the approved Construction Bid Package.

9. California Labor Code Compliance
a. Prevailing Wage laws apply, Subrecipient hereby agrees to pay, or cause its subcontractors to pay, Prevailing Wage rates at all times for all construction, improvements, or modifications to be completed for County under this Contract. Subrecipient herein agrees that Subrecipient shall post, or cause to be posted, a copy of the most current, applicable Prevailing Wage rates at the site where the construction, improvements, or modifications are performed. b. Payroll Records
Subrecipient agrees that:

Certified copies of all payroll records for this project shall be required pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code “Section 1776”. The reporting format and words of certification shall be as indicated in Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 16401.

Certified copies of the payroll records of all subcontractors working on this project are required. It shall be the responsibility of the prime contractor to ensure subcontractor compliance.

Certified copies of all payroll records shall be submitted on a weekly basis to County through the duration of this Contract.

Subrecipient acknowledges that failure to comply with Section 1776 may result in a forfeiture of one hundred dollars ($100) for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each worker, until strict compliance is effectuated, DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 39 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
and it should be recognized that a contractor or subcontractor, or agent or representative thereof who neglects to comply is guilty of a misdemeanor pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1777.

10. Economic Opportunities
Compliance
Subrecipient agrees to abide by the provisions of OMB Circulars 102 and 110, as applicable, 24 CFR 570.611 with respect to conflicts of interest, and covenants that it presently has no financial interest and shall not acquire any financial interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services required under this Contract.

Subrecipient further covenants that in the performance of this Contract no person having such a financial interest shall be employed or retained by Subrecipient hereunder. These conflict of interest provisions apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected official or appointed official of County or Subrecipient, or any designated public agencies which are receiving funds under the CDBG Entitlement Program.

This Contract is subject to the requirements of 12 USC 1701u, the HUD regulations issued pursuant thereto at 24 CFR, 135.1 et seq., and any applicable rules and orders of HUD issued Federal financial assistance shall be conditioned upon compliance with 12 USC 1701u. Failure to fulfill these requirements shall subject Subrecipient and any sub-Subrecipients, their successors and assigns, to those remedies specified herein.

Subrecipient certifies and agrees that no conflict exists which would prevent compliance with requirements.

The Subrecipient agrees to abide by 24 CFR, 135.38, below and will insert the following clause in any subcontracts executed with third parties for work covered by this Contract:
a. The work to be performed under this Contract is subject to the requirements of Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968, as amended (12 USC §1701u) ("Section 3"). The purpose of Section 3 is to ensure that employment and other economic opportunities generated by HUD assistance or HUDassisted developments covered by Section 3 shall, to the greatest extent feasible, be directed to low- and very low-income persons, including persons who are recipients of HUD assistance for housing, with a preference for both targeted workers living in the service area or neighborhood of the Development and YouthBuild participants, as defined at 24 CFR Part 75 ("Section 3
Regulations").
b. The Parties agree to comply with HUD's Regulations in 24 CFR, Part 75 which implement Section 3. As evidenced by their execution DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 40 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
of this Contract, the Parties certify that they are under no contractual or other impediments that would prevent them from complying with the Section 3 Regulations.
c. The Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor agrees to send to each labor organization or representative of workers with which the Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor has a collective bargaining agreement or other understanding, if any, a notice advising the labor organization or workers' representative of the Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor's commitments under this section of the Contract and will post copies of the notice in conspicuous places at the worksite where both employees and applicants for training and employment positions can see the notice. The notice shall describe the Section 3 preference and shall set forth the following: (i) minimum number and job titles subject to hire, (ii) availability of apprenticeship and training positions, (iii) qualifications for each, (iv) name and location of the person(s) taking applications for each of the positions, and (v) the anticipated date the work shall begin.
d. The Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor agrees to include this Section 3 clause in every subcontract subject to compliance with regulations in Section 3 Regulations and agrees to take appropriate action, as provided in an applicable provision of the subcontractor in this Section 3 clause, upon a finding that the subcontractor violates the regulations in Section 3 Regulations.

The Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor will not subcontract with any subcontractor where the Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor has notice or knowledge that the subcontractor has been found in violation of the regulations 24 CFR part 75.

e. The Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor will certify that any vacant employment positions, including training positions, that are filled (1) after a contractor is selected but before the Contract is executed, and (2) with persons other than those to whom the regulations of 24 CFR part 75 require employment opportunities to be directed, were not filled to circumvent the Sub-recipient, contractor, and subcontractor's obligations under 24 CFR part 75

f. Noncompliance with HUD's regulations in 24 CFR part 75 may result in sanctions, termination of this Contract for default, and debarment or suspension from future HUD assisted contracts.

11. Environmental Conditions:

Subrecipient shall comply with HUD Environmental Review under HUD regulations at 24 CFR 58 et seq., which implement the National DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 41 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); and, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No costs shall be incurred and no funds shall be disbursed prior to certification by County and/or HUD of environmental compliance.

Subrecipient shall incur no costs for any project-related activity defined in Subrecipient Scope of Services and County shall not disburse funds prior to certification by County and/or HUD for environmental compliance.

Subrecipient shall provide requested material to County for the Environmental Review process required by applicable regulations. a. Air and Water:

Subrecipient agrees to comply with the following regulations in so far as they apply to the performance of this Contract:

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C., 1857, et seq.

Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations pursuant to 40 CFR 50 and 40 CFR 58.
b. Flood Disaster Protection:

Subrecipient agrees to comply with the requirements of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, including as applicable any regulations set forth in 24 CFR 55, (implementing Executive Order 11988) in regard to the sale, lease or other transfer of land acquired, cleared, or improved under the terms of this Contract, as it may apply to the provisions of this Contract.
c. Lead-Based Paint:

Subrecipient agrees that any construction or rehabilitation of residential structures with assistance provided under this Contract shall be subject to HUD Lead-Based Paint Regulations at 24 CFR 570.608, and 24 CFR 35, particularly, 24 CFR 35.100 through

35.175. Such regulations pertain to all HUD-assisted housing and require that all owners, prospective owners, and tenants or properties constructed prior to 1978 be properly notified with the “Protect Your Family From Lead In Your Home” publication, found at http://www.epa.gov/lead that such properties may include leadbased paint. d. Historic Preservation:

Subrecipient agrees to comply with the Historic Preservation requirements set forth in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470) and the procedures set forth in 36 CFR 800, Protection of Historic Properties, insofar as they apply to the performance of this Contract.

In general, this requires concurrence from the State Historic Preservation Officer for all rehabilitation and demolition of historic properties that are fifty years old or older or that are included on a Federal, State, or local historic property list.
e. Energy Efficiency Standards:

Subrecipient agrees to comply with the California Energy Commission Assembly Bill 970, Title 24, Part I of the California DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 42 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Code of Regulations (AB970: Building Efficiency Energy
Standards), in regard to construction and property development, when applicable.
f. Modifications/Transfers of Real Property:

Any proposed modification or change in use of real property acquired or improved, in whole or in part, by CDBG funds from the use planned at the time of the acquisition or improvement, including disposition, is prohibited.
i. Subrecipient shall ensure that any real property under Subrecipient’s control that was acquired or improved in whole or in part with CDBG funds in excess of $25,000 is either:
i.i. Used to meet one of the national objectives contained in 24 CFR 570.208 for a period not less than five years,
or for such period of time as determined to be
appropriate by County, after expiration of the Contract and close-out of Subrecipient’s participation in the
CDBG Program, or, until five years after the close-out
of the grant from which the assistance to the property, whichever occurs first; or,
i.ii. Disposed of in a manner which results in County being reimbursed in an amount equal to the current fair
market value of the property less any portion thereof
attributable to expenditures of non-CDBG funds for
acquisition of, or improvement to, the property. Such
reimbursement is not required after the period of time
specified in accordance with this Paragraph 49.
g. Property Records:

Subrecipient shall maintain real property inventory records, which clearly identify properties purchased, improved, or sold. Properties retained shall continue to meet eligibility criteria, rental limitations, health, safety and building codes, etc., and shall conform to federal and State regulations.
h. Equipment:

Subrecipient shall use, manage and dispose of equipment in accordance with federal and State regulations.
i. Subcontracts:
i. Subrecipient shall submit all subcontract agreements to County for review and consent prior to entering into such subcontracts. For construction subcontracts, Subrecipient shall submit the Construction Bid Package to County for review and written approval by Director or designee prior to advertising for bids and award for the construction contract.

Subrecipient shall construct Project in accordance with the Construction Bid Package, which Director approved, unless prior written approval is received from Director for
modification thereof.
ii. Subrecipient shall assume responsibility for all
subcontracted services to assure Contract compliance.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 43 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
iii. Subrecipient shall cause all of the provisions of this Contract in entirety to be included in and made a part of any
subcontract executed in the performance of this Contract. iv. Subrecipient shall monitor all subcontracted services on a quarterly basis to assure Contract compliance. Results of said monitoring efforts shall be summarized in written form, and supported with documented evidence of follow-up
actions(s) to correct any area(s) of Contract noncompliance. Documentation shall be made available for periodic monitoring by representatives of County and/or HUD.
j. Fair Housing:

Subrecipient shall affirmatively further fair housing in accordance with 24 CFR 570. Under section 808(e)(5) of the Fair Housing Act, HUD has a statutory duty to affirmatively further fair housing. HUD requires the same of its funded sub-recipients. The Subrecipient has a duty to affirmatively further fair housing opportunities for classes protected under the Fair Housing Act, along with all applicable State & Federal requirements.
k. Grantor Recognition:

Subrecipient shall insure recognition of the role of the County in providing services through this Contract. All activities, facilities and items utilized pursuant to this Contract shall be prominently labeled as to funding source. In addition, Subrecipient will include a reference to the support provided herein in all publications made possible with funds made available under this Contract.

Subrecipient will retain documentation of such recognition, which shall be available for periodic monitoring by representatives of County or HUD.
l. Rehabilitation Act:

Subrecipient agrees to comply with any federal regulations issued pursuant to compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, (29 U.S.C. 706) which prohibits discrimination against the handicapped in any federally assisted program. County shall provide Subrecipient with any guidelines necessary for compliance with that portion of the regulations in force during the term of this Contract.

49. Definitions:

For the purposes of this Contract the following definitions shall apply:

A. OC Community Resources (OCCR): Designated as the Lead for the development and implementation of County of Orange Urban County Program’s Consolidated Plan.

B. Director: Director of OC Community Resources, or designee.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 44 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
C. Grantee Performance Report (GPR) Information Form: A Program activity data document provided by County to Subrecipient used to monitor, track and report the performance of Subrecipient.

D. OC Community Resources Contract Reimbursement Policy: A County document setting policies regarding types of documentation required to support the costs incurred and paid (including but not limited to copies of paid invoices, certified payroll registers, bank statements, etc.)
E. Project: Any site or sites, including buildings, and/or activities assisted with federal program funds.

F. OMB: Federal Office of Management and Budget.

G. CAPER: Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report. An annual published report to HUD and the public on all housing-related activities.

H. CDBG: 24 CFR Part 570 - Community Development Block Grant – the CDBG regulations set forth eligible activities and the national objectives that each activity must meet. The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) # 14.218 distributes formula grants (CDBG) to develop viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income.

I. Continuum of Care: An Orange County group composed of representatives of relevant organizations that serve homeless and formerly homeless persons that are organized to plan for and provide, as necessary, a system of services to address the various needs of homeless persons and persons at risk of homelessness.

J. Homeless Management Information System (HMIS): The information system designated by the Continuum of Care to comply with HUD’s data collection, management, and reporting standards and used to collect client-level data and data on the provision of housing and services to homeless individuals and families and persons at risk of homelessness. (24 CFR Part 580) K. Equipment: Tangible, non-expendable, personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit.

L. Substantial Amendment: The following criteria will be used by the County – if any one criteria applies, a substantial amendment will be required:
i. A new activity not previously listed and described in the Consolidated Plan/Annual Action Plan;
ii. When a proposal is made to amend the description of an existing activity in such a way that the newly described purpose, scope, or beneficiaries differ significantly from the original activity’s purpose, scope, or beneficiaries; and/or
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 45 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
iii. An increase in the amount of Federal Community Planning Development and/or local funds allocated to an existing activity when the following apply:
a. An increase in funding for a public service activity in an amount that is consistent with County policy; or
b. An increase in the funding for public facility
improvements/housing rehabilitation in an amount that is consistent with County policy.

M. Construction Bid Package: A package of bidding documents which includes the proposal, bidding instructions, Contract documents, detailed estimated costs, and plans and specifications for a construction project, all prepared in accordance with applicable Federal regulations.

N. Program Administration: An activity relating to the general management, oversight and coordination of community development programs. Costs directly related to carrying out eligible activities are not included.

THE REMAINDER OF THE PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC County of Orange Page 46 of 46 City of Stanton
OC Community Resources Contract # 012-23010767-CV
Signature Page
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto certify that they have read and understand all the terms and conditions contained herein and have hereby cause this Contract to be executed. *City of Stanton
By: By:

Name: Name:

Title: Title:

Dated: Dated:
*For Subrecipients that are corporations, signature requirements are as follows: 1) One signature by the Chairman of the Board, the President or any Vice President; and 2) One signature by the secretary, any Assistant secretary, the Chief Financial Officer or an Assistant Treasurer.

For Subrecipients that are not corporations, the person who has authority to bind the Subrecipient to a contract, must sign on one of the lines above. ************************************************************

COUNTY OF ORANGE
A Political Subdivision of the State of California
COUNTY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE:

Print Name Title

Signature Dated

APPROVED AS TO FORM

DEPUTY COUNTY COUNSEL
By: Dated:

Deputy County Counsel

DocuSign Envelope ID: 27ABB20C-7FFB-49BF-BD41-55A1670591DC 1/11/2023
Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
1/17/2023
Contract Administrator Nina Campmas
1/24/2023

CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: July 9, 2024
SUBJECT: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MATRIX AUDIO VISUAL DESIGNS, INC. FOR COUNCIL CHAMBER AUDIO SYSTEM

RENOVATION SERVICES
REPORT IN BRIEF:

The City Council will consider entering into a Professional Services Agreement with Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc. (Matrix) for the Council Chamber Audio System Renovation project.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council find that this item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Authorize the City Manager to enter into a Professional Services Agreement between the City and Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc. for audio system renovation services in the Council Chamber in the amount of $78,184.30 for a term of one year with two additional one-year extensions; and

3. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders as needed and determined by City staff, for any contingencies up to $5,000, increasing the total authorized compensation for this agreement to a potential maximums of $83,184.30.

BACKGROUND:

After receiving Council direction, staff initiated a process to explore upgrading and renovating the audio system in the City’s Council Chambers. The existing audio system is outdated and was last updated in December 2013. The system fails to provide satisfactory performance in the following three categories:

Item: 9J
Click here to return to the agenda.
• Audio Input. The current system lacks the strength to receive sound from both the hard-wired and wireless microphones in order to sufficiently capture live meeting audio by the City’s recording system. Speakers have to position their hold microphones very close to their face (or lean towards the dais microphones) in order for audio to be reliably picked up.
• Speaker Output. The City’s only functional control is to either increase or lower the volume of the speaker system. This limited functional control results in the sound pickup sensitivity becoming either too low (i.e., speech is inaudible or barely audible) or too high (i.e., amplified, high-frequency feedback is projected throughout the speaker system).
• Connectivity. The current system is incompatible with key external devices, including accessibility technology and video conferencing equipment.

Communication with meeting participants via Zoom utilizes the microphone and speakers of the DTEN digital whiteboard, which is not ideal.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

On February 29, 2024, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the Council Chamber Audio System Renovation project (Attachment A) and defined the desired scope of the project, posted the documents on the City’s website, and conducted a mandatory walk-through on March 14, 2024, for all interested vendors to review the project. Staff provided the following basic specifications of the Council Chambers as follows:
• Council Chamber Dimensions
o Floor space: approx. 1,570 square feet (30.6 feet wide by 51.2 feet long) o Ceiling height: approx. 28-30 feet
• Standard/Comfortable Seating Arrangement
o 36 audience attendees
o 8 members on the dais
o 6 department directors at two executive tables
o 150 official room capacity
• Standard Microphone Count
o 8 hard-wired gooseneck microphones along the dais—seven of which are input-activated (i.e., turning on only when speech is detected within its “bubble”)
o 1 wireless, handheld microphone for presentations and public comment at a podium facing the dais—roughly in the center of the council chambers o 2 wireless, handheld microphones—one placed at each department directors executive table
• The well space of the council chambers is bounded by the podium, the dais, and the two department directors executive tables that face each other.

Seven (7) vendors attended the walk-through. After receiving clarifying questions from interested proposers, the City released Addendum 1 on April 1, 2024, and Addendum 2 to the RFP on April 2, 2024 (Attachment B). Final responses were due on April 5, 2024.

The City received 5 proposals in response to the City’s RFP. A three-member review committee was formed consisting of the City Manager, Director of Public Works, and City Clerk. The City’s Human Resources Management Analyst served as the RFP coordinator. The committee reviewed, and evaluated each on the following factors:

Criteria Weight
Approach to providing services, including the methods
and techniques to be utilized for assessment and ongoing management, and customer service 25%
Cost of the services to reflect value and fiscal prudence 25% Demonstrated record of success on similar work
performed for other municipalities or enterprises 25%
Qualifications and ability of the firm in regard to providing the services outlined in the “Scope of Services” 25%
The Council Chamber Audio System Renovation scope of services includes services that can be reasonably expected to design, develop, and install an upgraded audio solution that provides ease of use, sound quality, audio recording and archiving, efficient and effective setup, and accessibility elements.

After reviewing proposals, conducting interviews with all five proposers, and verifying references, staff determined that Matrix was the best-qualified firm to provide professional services to meet the City’s needs. References were checked with the Cities of Montclair, Fontana, and Hesperia; the Town of Apple Valley; and the Fontana Unified School District. Each firm's total scores were as follows, shown in alphabetical order below.

Company Score
Avidex 121.5
Eidim 91.25
Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc. 128.75
Vidiflo 97.5
Western Audio Visual & Security 121.25
The cost of the project with Matrix is $78,184.30. The initial one-year term of the contract is from July 10, 2024 to July 9, 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The Fiscal Year 2024-25 Adopted Operating Budget includes $85,000 for Council Chamber Audio Renovation services, sufficient funds to cover the cost of the proposed contract.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

This item is not subject to California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Sections 15378(b)(5)(Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment).

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Public notification provided through the regular agenda process.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES:

Obj. No. 3: Promote a quality infrastructure.

Obj. No. 4: Ensure fiscal stability and efficiency in governance.

Prepared by: Sylvia Soong, Human Resources Management Analyst Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Attachments:

A. RFP for Council Chamber Audio System Renovation
B. Professional Services Agreement with Matrix

Page 1 of 12 ends

Administration Department
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
(714) 379-9222 | StantonCA.gov
Approved for Advertising:
______________________
City Manager
[email protected]
(714) 890-4277
Issue Date: Thursday, February 29, 2024
Mandatory Site Visit: Thursday, March 14, 2024, at 10:00 am PST Deadline for Questions: Friday, March 22, 2024, at 5:00 pm PST Proposal Due Date: Friday, April 5, 2024, at 5:00 pm PST Presentation/Interviews: Early May 2024
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

Page 2 of 12 ends

The City of Stanton (“City”) is requesting proposals from qualified firms to conduct a detailed inspection and assessment of the City’s Council Chamber audio system, recommend renovations for sound quality and ADA compliance, and complete such renovations (“Council Chamber Audio System Renovation Services”).

A Mandatory Site Visit event will be held at Stanton City Hall (7800 Katella Ave., Stanton, CA 90680) at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 14th, 2024. City staff will provide access to the audio/visual equipment and explain the desired audio system functionality. Only firms with a technical representative in attendance for the Mandatory Site Visit are eligible to have their proposal reviewed.

All questions and/or inquiries regarding this RFP shall be directed to Jason Huynh, RFP Administrator, via email at [email protected] by 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 22
nd
, 2024. Responses to inquiries, if they significantly
change or clarify the RFP requirements, will be forwarded via written (emailed) addenda to all proposers and posted publicly.

Proposals must conform to the requirements of this RFP, and proposals must be submitted via email to the RFP Administrator no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, April 5th, 2024.

The City of Stanton’s council chamber audio system was most recently updated in December 2013. In addition to hosting the meetings of the City Council and Commissions, the council chambers are also utilized occasionally for staff training sessions, staff meetings with developers, and large conferences. Although the council chambers are used on occasion for overflow meetings, the primary use of the space is for Council and Commission meetings which, on average, last between two and four hours. Diagrams and photos of the council chambers have been included as EXHIBIT A, “Council Chamber Images and Plans.” (NOTE: The attached plans are to be used for reference only.)

Page 3 of 12 ends

The basic specifications of the council chambers are as follows:
• Council Chamber Dimensions
o Floor space: approx. 1,570 square feet (30.6 feet wide by 51.2 feet long)
o Ceiling height: approx. 28-30 feet
• Standard/Comfortable Seating Arrangement
o 36 audience attendees
o 8 members on the dais
o 6 department directors at two executive tables
o 150 official room capacity
• Standard Microphone Count
o 8 hard-wired gooseneck microphones along the dais—seven of which are input-activated (i.e., turning on only when speech is detected within its “bubble”)
o 1 wireless, handheld microphone for presentations and public comment at a podium facing the dais—roughly in the center of the council chambers
o 2 wireless, handheld microphones—one placed at each
department directors executive table
• The well space of the council chambers is bounded by the podium, the dais, and the two department directors executive tables that face each other.

The existing sound system in the council chambers consists of a ceilingmounted Atlas Sound 8” coaxial 8-speaker system with 70.7V / 100V - 60W transformer and BΩ bypass. The existing sound system in the council chamber lobby consists of a ceiling-mounted Atlas Sound 8” coaxial 2-speaker system with 70.7V / 100V - 60W transformer and BΩ bypass, along with 2 additional Bose speakers. The volume level for each system is controlled by a 10-level attenuator knob/dial.

The City utilizes the Zoom Communications application on a DTEN ON interactive whiteboard to allow members of the public to virtually attend public meetings in the council chambers. The Zoom meetings are recorded and uploaded to the City of Stanton YouTube channel. A separate audio recorder, powered by an aging (Windows) PC laptop operating an outdated For the Record software application, is operated by the City Clerk during public

Page 4 of 12 ends

meetings; those .mp3 files are uploaded to the City’s website under “Agendas & Minutes.”
The existing sound system fails to provide satisfactory performance in three main respects:
• Audio Input. The current system lacks the strength to receive sound from both the hard-wired and wireless microphones in order to sufficiently capture live meeting audio by the City’s recording system.

Speakers have to position their hold microphones very close to their face (or lean towards the dais microphones) in order for audio to be reliably picked up.
• Speaker Output. The City’s only functional control is to either increase or lower the volume of the speaker system. This limited functional control results in the sound pickup sensitivity becoming either too low (i.e., speech is inaudible or barely audible) or too high (i.e., amplified, highfrequency feedback is projected throughout the speaker system). • Connectivity. The current system is incompatible with key external devices, including accessibility technology and video conferencing equipment. Communication with meeting participants via Zoom utilizes the microphone and speakers of the DTEN digital whiteboard, which is not ideal.

The City does not have documentation, schematics, or programming code pertaining to the original installation of the audio system. Contractors are required to familiarize themselves with the existing audio equipment through the Mandatory Site Visit.

The City is seeking qualified contractors with a minimum of three (3) years of experience providing Council Chamber Audio System Renovation Services similar to those requested in this Scope of Services. Contractors with experience and current contracts with public agencies, particularly in Orange County, are highly desirable. Contractor shall be prepared to furnish all labor, including travel and per diem, materials, non-consumable supplies, equipment, transportation, and every other line-item of expense necessary to successfully provide Council Chamber Audio System Renovation Services. The City desires the most economical solution that fully meets the City’s requirements.

Page 5 of 12 ends

The Council Chamber Audio System Renovation Services shall include all services that can be reasonably expected to design, develop, and install an upgraded audio solution that provides all of the following:
• Ease of use- durable, fully integrated design centered around a wireless touchscreen controller/mixer with ability to mute and adjust the volume on individual microphones and speakers.
• Sound quality- reliable, even, and controlled sound coverage throughout the council chambers and council chambers lobby for all forms of media, including speech, music, and recording playback. Must provide an easy listening experience for both in-person and remote audiences. • Audio recording & archiving (optional)- a more intuitive, systemcompatible network recorder/archiver. • Efficient & effective setup- complete compatibility with the existing visual equipment, and energy-efficient wireless microphones (handheld and lapel) that have a long battery life.
• Accessibility elements- compatibility with wireless assistive devices for those with hearing and vision impairments, in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and California accessibility requirements (collectively, “Accessibility Requirements”).

The Council Chamber Audio System Renovation Services shall include all of the following:

1. Listing and detailed specifications of all materials

2. Detailed description of all labor required for (removal and) installation

3. Replacement of council chamber audio system

4. Programming, testing, and adjustments

5. Single-line diagram, schematics, and programming code information

6. Operating manual and warranty information for all installed equipment

7. Training and limited-term post-installation support

Page 6 of 12 ends

In order to be considered, the Contractor must submit before the deadline one (1) electronic copy of the complete proposal to:

[email protected].

Contractors must submit their proposals as set forth below:
• Proposals shall be titled “Proposal for Council Chamber Audio System Renovation Services”.
• All materials shall be sized to 8 ½” x 11” sheets, with a minimum of 11-pt font, and saved to a PDF version for transmission.
• Proposals should not include any unnecessarily elaborate promotional material.
• Proposals should be clear and concise—lengthy narrative is discouraged.

A complete proposal consists of the following two (2) separate elements:
the services proposal and the cost proposal.

SERVICES PROPOSAL
The Services Proposal shall consist of the following sections (in order):

1. Submission Transmittal Form
EXHIBIT B, “Submission Transmittal Form,” shall be fully completed and submitted in PDF format.

2. Qualifications, Relevant Experience, and References
This section of the proposal shall establish the ability of the Contractor to satisfactorily perform the required work by reasons of:
• Experience in performing work of a similar nature to the required services shown in the Scope of Services
• Proven competence in the services to be provided
• Strength and stability of the firm
• Staffing capacity
• Track record of meeting schedules on similar projects and supportive client references

Page 7 of 12 ends

This section shall, at a minimum:
• Describe the firm’s relevant experience in performing work of a similar nature to that solicited in this RFP, highlighting the participation in such work by the key personnel proposed for assignment to the City.
• Describe the firm’s financial condition by identifying any conditions that may impede the Contractor’s ability to provide these services (e.g., bankruptcy, settlements paid in the last five years, pending litigation, planned office closures, impending merger, etc.).
• Identify sub-contractors by company name, address, contact person, telephone number, email address, and project function, if applicable. The list should include a summary of the roles and responsibilities of each sub-contractor.
• Using EXHIBIT C, “References Form,” provide a minimum of three (3) references for completed work in the past five (5) years similar to the required services shown in the Scope of Services. • Provide a list of all organizations which in the past five (5) years have contracted with the firm for work similar to the required services shown in the Scope of Services. The list should identify which, if any, of the organizations terminated or cancelled their contract with the firm; failure to list any such organizations, willfully or otherwise, may be grounds for rejection of the proposal.

3. Proposed Team
• Identify a proposed Project Manager, who will be responsible for planning, coordinating, and conducting the majority of the work.

The Project Manager will serve as the City’s day-to-day contact for this project.
• Describe key personnel’s specialized training, experience, and professional competence in the area(s) directly related to this RFP.

If providing résumés of key personnel, limit them to two pages maximum per résumé.
• Describe the specific project responsibilities for each key personnel member (and sub-contractor). Specify if any of the key personnel are based outside of the area (25-mile radius).

Page 8 of 12 ends

• Include a statement that key personnel will have undergone criminal background and fingerprinting checks (at Contractor’s sole expense) that finds such personnel clear of any sexual, drugrelated, or felony convictions. • Include a statement that key personnel will be available to the extent proposed for the duration of the required services, acknowledging that no person designated as “key” shall be removed or replaced without the prior written concurrence of the City.

4. Understanding of Project Needs
Contractor shall provide a detailed narrative describing the deficiencies in the current audio system that were observed during the Mandatory Site Visit, including wiring/electrical problems, broken equipment, unused equipment, poor installation, etc.

5. Approach and Project Schedule
Contractor shall provide a detailed narrative and critical-path timeline of the project approach, methodology, and services they will employ to reach project milestones and deliverables. Contractor shall include a detailed description of specific activities, if any, they will require of City staff.

Contractor shall also provide a detailed narrative of its on-call maintenance & technical support abilities post-implementation.

Contractor shall list the hours of availability and standard in-person response times for their technicians. Technicians must be familiar with the audio system equipment & software and come prepared with the tools and diagnostic equipment to troubleshoot and repair common issues. The City expects that Contractor be able to commit to responding via telephone to support requests within thirty (30) minutes during regular business hours. Should staff require in-person support, the City expects that Contractor be able to commit to having a technician arrive at the council chambers within ninety (90) minutes.

Page 9 of 12 ends

6. Exceptions and Deviations
Contractor shall state any exceptions or deviations from the requirements of this RFP, segregating “technical” exceptions from “contractual” exceptions. Where the Contractor wishes to propose alternative approaches to meeting the City’s technical or contractual requirements, these shall be thoroughly explained. If no contractual exceptions are noted, Contractor will be deemed to have no objection to the contract requirements as set forth in EXHIBIT D, “Sample Professional Services Agreement.”

7. Proof of Insurance
Contractor shall provide a current certificate of insurance that verifies the Contractor has insurance coverage that meets the insurance requirements set forth in EXHIBIT D, “Sample Professional Services Agreement,” barring any contractual exceptions made.

COST PROPOSAL
In a separate file, Contractor shall provide their Cost Proposal. All taxes, insurance, and licenses, including, but not limited to, a Stanton City Business License, required for this work shall be obtained at the sole expense of the Contractor. Contractor shall state any assumptions on which costs are based.

The Cost Proposal shall consist of the following sections (in order):

1. Project Costs
Contractor shall present project costs broken down by project phases.

Project costs shall be on a fixed-price, all-inclusive basis, meaning that mileage, printing, mailing, and other reimbursable costs shall be built into the pricing. Contractor shall note any Consumer Price Index (CPI) and other annual cost increases, with the understanding that such yearover-year cost increases will be judged unfavorably by the City.

2. Schedule of Hourly Rates
Contractor shall provide a schedule of hourly rates for each staff member of the proposed team, as well as any other relevant specialty personnel for the purposes of on-call maintenance and repair services regarding the audio system.

Page 10 of 12 ends

If and when the Contractor is performing, or is requested to perform, work beyond the Scope of Services, an amendment to the Professional Services Agreement will be executed between the City and Contractor. In such instances, unless the work was described and quoted in the proposal as an add-on service, payment will be based on the rates identified in the schedule of hourly rates.

The City alone, using criteria determined by the City, will select the most qualified candidate. Submitted proposals will be evaluated based on the following factors, but may not be limited to just these factors:

Criteria Approximate
Weight
Approach to providing services, including the methods
and techniques to be utilized for assessment and ongoing management, and customer service
25%
Cost of the services to reflect value and fiscal prudence 25% Demonstrated record of success on similar work
performed for other municipalities or enterprises 25%
Qualifications and ability of the firm in regard to providing the services outlined in the “Scope of Services” 25%
Selection of the Contractor will be made in accordance with the provision of Chapter 10 of the California Government Code, Sections 4526 and 4529.5, stating that the selection of professional services shall be made based on competence and qualifications for the types of services to be performed at a fair and reasonable price. The cost proposals will be opened and evaluated after qualification evaluations of all proposers are complete. The contract award shall be made to the Contractor providing the best value to the City.

Each proposal will be reviewed to determine if it meets the submittal requirements contained within this RFP. Failure to meet the requirements for the RFP will be cause for rejection of the proposal. The City may reject any proposal if it is conditional, incomplete, or contains irregularities. The City may request written clarification or additional documentation for any proposal. The City may waive any immaterial deviations in a proposal, but this shall in no way

Page 11 of 12 ends

modify the proposal document or excuse the Contractor from compliance with the contract requirements if the Contractor is awarded the contract.

The City reserves the right to require in-person interviews with and/or presentations from Contractors, if deemed necessary, after the evaluation of the written proposals by a selection panel. In this case, the Contractors of the highest-scoring written proposals will be invited to interview/present.

In the event that a Contractor is selected, the successful Contractor to whom work is awarded shall, within ten (10) days after being notified, enter into a contract with the City for the work in accordance with the specifications and shall furnish all required documents necessary to enter into said contract.

Failure of the successful applicant to execute the contract within the ten (10)- day window shall be just cause for the City to contract with the next most responsible Contractor. The terms and conditions set forth in EXHIBIT D, “Sample Professional Services Agreement,” are subject to change without notice at any time prior to contract award. Upon execution of the contract, the contract shall take precedence over the RFP in the event of a conflict between the two documents.

A kick-off meeting shall be held after the final execution of the contract.

Contractor and its team will meet with City staff to conduct introductions, discuss scope of services, and confirm the implementation process.

Pre-contractual expenses are defined as expenses incurred by the Contractor in: (1) preparing the proposal; (2) submitting the proposal to the City; (3) presenting during the selection interview; (4) negotiating with the City on any matter related to the proposal; and (5) any other expenses incurred by the Contractor prior to an executed Agreement.

The City shall not, in any event, be liable for any pre-contractual expenses incurred by the Contractor. Services shall not commence until the Professional Services Agreement has been executed by the City.

By submitting a proposal, Contractor attests that they have not been a party to any collusion among proposers in restraint of freedom of competition. This means that the Contractor has not directly or indirectly entered into any agreement, express or implied, with any other vendor(s) for the purposes of

Page 12 of 12 ends

controlling the price or scope of services of said proposal or limiting the number of proposals submitted to the City.

The City reserves the right to retain all proposals submitted, and to use any idea in a proposal, regardless of whether the proposal was selected. Materials submitted by respondents are subject to public inspection under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Sec. 6250 et seq.). Any language purporting to render the entire proposal confidential or proprietary will be ineffective and disregarded.

All property rights, including publication rights of all reports produced by the selected firm in connection with services performed under this agreement, shall be vested in the City.

The City reserves the right to amend or withdraw this RFP at any time without prior notice. Further, the City makes no representations that any Agreement will be awarded to any Consultant responding to this RFP. The City expressly reserves the right to postpone reviewing the proposals for its own convenience and to reject any and all proposals responding to this RFP without indicating any reasons for such rejection(s).

Labeled Diagram - Council Chambers & Lobby
*Diagram is not to scale.

Council Chambers Lobby
Audience View – Back Left Corner
Audience View – Right Side (Front Row)
Dais View – Center
Dais View – Down Dais (from Left)
Audio Control – Council Chamber Back Hall
Ceiling View – 8 Speakers
1 2
3 4
5 6 7 8
Ceiling View – 2 & 2 Speakers
1 A B 2

APPLICATION
Request for Proposals Subject Council Chamber Audio System Renovation Legal Name of Submitter (and d/b/a)
Type of Organization
(corporation, limited liability company,
partnership, sole proprietorship, etc.)
Years of Experience Performing the
Requested Services
Federal Employer ID
Number (FEIN)
Contractor License No. (if
applicable)
City of Corporate Headquarters Estimated Number of
Employees (company-wide) Website
Address for Notices
Contact Information Regarding This Submittal
Email Address Phone Number Fax Number (if applicable)
(___) ___-____ (___) ___-____
Attestation Statement
By completing and signing this form, I hereby attest to all of the following:
1) I am an authorized signatory for the aforementioned Submitter. 2) In preparing this submission, the Submitter has thoroughly abided by the RFP, as well as any and all related addenda.
3) A technical representative of the Submitter was present for the Mandatory Site Visit. 4) All information submitted in this submission is true and correct.

Signature
(Scanned wet signature or
Formally timestamped e-signature)
Name (printed)
Title
If you have any questions, please contact Jason Huynh, Management Analyst, at [email protected].

REFERENCES FORM
Application Form
City of Stanton | 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 | www.StantonCA.gov City of Stanton | 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 | www.StantonCA.gov | 1 REFERENCE #1
Name of Agency/Organization
Contact Information
(Person Most Knowledgeable About the Work Performed)
Name Title Address (of Agency/ Organization)
Email Address Phone Number
(___) ___-____
Description of the Services Provided
Proposed Key Personnel that
were Involved with This Project
Date Range that Services Were
Provided
Total Cost
REFERENCE #2
Name of Agency/Organization
Contact Information
(Person Most Knowledgeable About the Work Performed)
Name Title Address (of Agency/ Organization)
Email Address Phone Number
(___) ___-____
Description of the Services Provided

REFERENCES FORM
Application Form
City of Stanton | 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 | www.StantonCA.gov City of Stanton | 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, CA 90680 | www.StantonCA.gov | 2 Proposed Key Personnel that
were Involved with This Project
Date Range that Services Were
Provided
Total Cost
REFERENCE #3
Name of Agency/Organization
Contact Information
(Person Most Knowledgeable About the Work Performed)
Name Title Address (of Agency/ Organization)
Email Address Phone Number
(___) ___-____
Description of the Services Provided
Proposed Key Personnel that
were Involved with This Project
Date Range that Services Were
Provided
Total Cost
If you have any questions, please contact Jason Huynh, Management Analyst, at [email protected]. 55414.00000\32996936.2
Exhibit D

CITY OF STANTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

COUNCIL CHAMBER AUDIO SYSTEM RENOVATION SERVICES

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this day of , 2024, by and between the City of Stanton, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680 (“City”) and [INSERT NAME OF COMPANY], a [INSERT TYPE OF BUSINESS; CORPORATION; LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; ETC.], with its principal place of business at [INSERT ADDRESS] (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

Consultant desires to perform and assume responsibility for the provision of professional Council Chamber Audio System Renovation services required by the City on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant represents that it is experienced in providing professional Council Chamber Audio System Renovation services to public clients, is licensed in the State of California, and is familiar with the plans of City.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Council Chamber Audio System Renovation project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.1 General Scope of Services. Consultant promises and agrees to furnish to the City all labor, materials, tools, equipment, services, and incidental and customary work necessary to fully and adequately supply the professional Council Chamber Audio System Renovation services necessary for the Project (“Services”). The Services are more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. All Services shall be subject to, and performed in accordance with, this Agreement, the exhibits attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules, and regulations.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from [INSERT START DATE] to [INSERT ENDING DATE], unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City Manager shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement annually for no more than two additional one-year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 2 -

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractors, Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision.

Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details of performing the Services subject to the requirements of this Agreement. City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and not as an employee. Consultant shall complete, execute, and submit to City a Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification (IRS Form W-9) prior to commencement of any Services under this Agreement. Consultant retains the right to perform similar or different services for others during the term of this Agreement. Any additional personnel performing the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall also not be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Neither City, nor any of its officials, officers, directors, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all wages, salaries, and other amounts due such personnel in connection with their performance of Services under this Agreement and as required by law. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to, social security taxes, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers’ compensation insurance.

3.2.2 Schedule of Services. Consultant shall perform the Services expeditiously, within the term of this Agreement, and in accordance with the Schedule of Services set forth in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Consultant represents that it has the professional and technical personnel required to perform the Services in conformance with such conditions. In order to facilitate Consultant’s conformance with the Schedule, City shall respond to Consultant’s submittals in a timely manner. Upon request of City, Consultant shall provide a more detailed schedule of anticipated performance to meet the Schedule of Services.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

3.2.4 Substitution of Key Personnel. Consultant has represented to City that certain key personnel will perform and coordinate the Services under this Agreement. Should one or more of such personnel become unavailable, Consultant may substitute other personnel of at least equal competence upon written approval of City. In the event that City and Consultant cannot agree as to the substitution of key personnel, City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement for cause. As discussed below, any personnel who fail or refuse to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, or who are determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project or a threat to the safety of persons or property, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant at the request of the City.

The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: [INSERT NAME(S)].

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates Patricia Vazquez, City Clerk, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 3 -
Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates [INSERT NAME OR TITLE], or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.7 Coordination of Services. Consultant agrees to work closely with City staff in the performance of Services and shall be available to City’s staff, consultants, and other staff at all reasonable times.

3.2.8 Standard of Care; Performance of Employees. Consultant shall perform all Services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner, consistent with the standards generally recognized as being employed by professionals in the same discipline in the State of California. Consultant represents and maintains that it is skilled in the professional calling necessary to perform the Services. Consultant warrants that all employees and subconsultants shall have sufficient skill and experience to perform the Services assigned to them. Finally, Consultant represents that it, its employees and subconsultants have all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to perform the Services and that such licenses and approvals shall be maintained throughout the term of this Agreement.

As provided for in the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, Consultant shall perform, at its own cost and expense and without reimbursement from the City, any services necessary to correct errors or omissions which are caused by the Consultant’s failure to comply with the standard of care provided for herein. Any employee of the Consultant or its sub-consultants who is determined by the City to be uncooperative, incompetent, a threat to the adequate or timely completion of the Project, a threat to the safety of persons or property, or any employee who fails or refuses to perform the Services in a manner acceptable to the City, shall be promptly removed from the Project by the Consultant and shall not be re-employed to perform any of the Services or to work on the Project.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 4 -

3.2.10.1 Time for Compliance. Consultant shall not commence Work under this Agreement until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subconsultant to commence work on any subcontract until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City that the subconsultant has secured all insurance required under this section.

3.2.10.2 Types of Insurance Required. As a condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement for work to be performed hereunder and without limiting the indemnity provisions of the Agreement, the Consultant in partial performance of its obligations under such Agreement, shall procure and maintain in full force and effect during the term of the Agreement, the insurance specified in Exhibit “D” attached hereto and incorporated herein. If the existing policies do not meet the Insurance Requirements set forth herein, Consultant agrees to amend, supplement, or endorse the policies to do so.

3.2.10.3 Primary and Non-Contributing Insurance. All insurance coverages shall be primary and any other insurance, deductible, or self-insurance maintained by the indemnified parties shall not contribute with this primary insurance. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.4 Waiver of Subrogation. Required insurance coverages shall not prohibit Consultant from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Consultant shall waive all subrogation rights against the indemnified parties. Policies shall contain or be endorsed to contain such provisions.

3.2.10.5 Deductible. Any deductible or self-insured retention must be approved in writing by the City and shall protect the indemnified parties in the same manner and to the same extent as they would have been protected had the policy or policies not contained a deductible or self-insured retention.

3.2.10.6 Evidence of Insurance. The Consultant, concurrently with the execution of the Agreement, and as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, shall deliver either certified copies of the required policies, or original certificates and endorsements on forms approved by the City. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. At least fifteen (15 days) prior to the expiration of any such policy, evidence of insurance showing that such insurance coverage has been renewed or extended shall be filed with the City. If such coverage is cancelled or reduced, Consultant shall, within ten (10) days after receipt of written notice of such cancellation or reduction of coverage, file with the City evidence of insurance showing that the required insurance has been reinstated or has been provided through another insurance company or companies.

3.2.10.7 Failure to Maintain Coverage. Consultant agrees to suspend and cease all operations hereunder during such period of time as the required insurance coverage is not in effect and evidence of insurance has not been furnished to the City. The City shall have the right to withhold any payment due to the Consultant until Consultant has fully complied with the insurance provisions of this Agreement.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 5 -
In the event that the Consultant’s operations are suspended for failure to maintain required insurance coverage, the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for completion of the Services because of production lost during suspension.

3.2.10.8 Acceptability of Insurers. Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VIII and authorized to do business in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

3.2.10.9 Insurance for Subconsultants. All Subconsultants shall be included as additional insureds under the Consultant’s policies, or the Consultant shall be responsible for causing Subconsultants to purchase the appropriate insurance in compliance with the terms of these Insurance Requirements, including adding the City as an Additional Insured to the Subconsultant’s policies.

3.2.11 Safety. Consultant shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out its Services, the Consultant shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and life-saving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subconsultants, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth in Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed [INSERT WRITTEN DOLLAR AMOUNT] DOLLARS ($[INSERT NUMBER]) (“Total Compensation”) without written approval of City’s City Manager. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant.

The statement shall describe the amount of Services and supplies provided since the initial commencement date, or since the start of the subsequent billing periods, as appropriate, through the date of the statement. City shall, within 45 days of receiving such statement, review the statement and pay all approved charges thereon.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 6 -

3.3.4 Extra Work. At any time during the term of this Agreement, City may request that Consultant perform Extra Work. As used herein, “Extra Work” means any work which is determined by City to be necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which the Parties did not reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this Agreement.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.3.5 Prevailing Wages. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable “public works” or “maintenance” project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. City shall provide Consultant with a copy of the prevailing rates of per diem wages in effect at the commencement of this Agreement. Consultant shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the project site. It is the intent of the parties to effectuate the requirements of sections 1771, 1774, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815 of the Labor Code within this Agreement, and Consultant shall therefore comply with such Labor Code sections to the fullest extent required by law. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.4.1 Maintenance and Inspection. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to all costs and expenses incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records and any other documents created pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

3.5.1.1 Grounds for Termination. City may, by written notice to Consultant, terminate the whole or any part of this Agreement at any time and without cause by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination, and specifying the effective date thereof, at least seven (7) days before the effective date of such termination. Upon termination, Consultant shall be compensated only for those services which have been adequately rendered to City, and Consultant shall be entitled to no further compensation. Consultant may not terminate this Agreement except for cause.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 7 -

3.5.1.2 Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, City may require Consultant to provide all finished or unfinished Documents and Data and other information of any kind prepared by Consultant in connection with the performance of Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall be required to provide such document and other information within fifteen (15) days of the request.

3.5.1.3 Additional Services. In the event this Agreement is terminated in whole or in part as provided herein, City may procure, upon such terms and in such manner as it may determine appropriate, services similar to those terminated.

3.5.2 Delivery of Notices. All notices permitted or required under this Agreement shall be given to the respective parties at the following address, or at such other address as the respective parties may provide in writing for this purpose:

Consultant:
[INSERT NAME, ADDRESS & CONTACT PERSON]
City:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Attn: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, Administration Department
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including, but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data.

Consultant makes no such representation and warranty in regard to Documents & Data which were prepared by design professionals other than Consultant or provided to Consultant by the City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Data at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City’s sole risk. 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 8 -

3.5.3.2 Confidentiality. All ideas, memoranda, specifications, plans, procedures, drawings, descriptions, computer program data, input record data, written information, and other Documents and Data either created by or provided to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement shall be held confidential by Consultant. Such materials shall not, without the prior written consent of City, be used by Consultant for any purposes other than the performance of the Services. Nor shall such materials be disclosed to any person or entity not connected with the performance of the Services or the Project. Nothing furnished to Consultant which is otherwise known to Consultant or is generally known, or has become known, to the related industry shall be deemed confidential. Consultant shall not use City’s name or insignia, photographs of the Project, or any publicity pertaining to the Services or the Project in any magazine, trade paper, newspaper, television or radio production or other similar medium without the prior written consent of City.

3.5.3.3 Confidential Information. The City shall refrain from releasing Consultant’s proprietary information (“Proprietary Information”) unless the City’s legal counsel determines that the release of the Proprietary Information is required by the California Public Records Act or other applicable state or federal law, or order of a court of competent jurisdiction, in which case the City shall notify Consultant of its intention to release Proprietary Information.

Consultant shall have five (5) working days after receipt of the Release Notice to give City written notice of Consultant’s objection to the City’s release of Proprietary Information. Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City, and its officers, directors, employees, and agents from and against all liability, loss, cost or expense (including attorney’s fees) arising out of a legal action brought to compel the release of Proprietary Information. City shall not release the Proprietary Information after receipt of the Objection Notice unless either: (1) Consultant fails to fully indemnify, defend (with City’s choice of legal counsel), and hold City harmless from any legal action brought to compel such release; and/or (2) a final and non-appealable order by a court of competent jurisdiction requires that City release such information.

3.5.4 Cooperation; Further Acts. The Parties shall fully cooperate with one another and shall take any additional acts or sign any additional documents as may be necessary, appropriate or convenient to attain the purposes of this Agreement.

3.5.5 Attorney’s Fees. If either party commences an action against the other party, either legal, administrative, or otherwise, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing party reasonable attorney’s fees and all other costs of such action.

3.5.6 Indemnification.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, 55414.00000\32996936.2
- 9 -
expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

If Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant’s performance as a “design professional” (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant’s indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant’s liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant’s proportionate percentage of fault.

3.5.7 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior negotiations, understandings, or agreements. This Agreement may only be modified by a writing signed by both parties.

3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.

3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.8 Assignment or Transfer. Consultant shall not assign, hypothecate, or transfer, either directly or by operation of law, this Agreement or any interest herein without the prior written consent of the City. Any attempt to do so shall be null and void, and any assignees, hypothecates or transferees shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.

3.9 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days.

All references to Consultant include all personnel, employees, agents, and subconsultants of Consultant, except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. All references to City include its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers except as otherwise specified in this Agreement. The captions of the various articles and paragraphs are for convenience and ease of reference only, and do not define, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of this Agreement.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 10 -

3.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.11 Waiver. No waiver of any default shall constitute a waiver of any other default or breach, whether of the same or other covenant or condition. No waiver, benefit, privilege, or service voluntarily given or performed by a Party shall give the other Party any contractual rights by custom, estoppel, or otherwise.

3.12 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.13 Invalidity; Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is declared invalid, illegal, or otherwise unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.

3.14 Prohibited Interests. Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no member, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.

3.15 Equal Opportunity Employment. Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not discriminate against any subconsultant, employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination. Consultant shall also comply with all relevant provisions of City’s Minority Business Enterprise program, Affirmative Action Plan or other related programs or guidelines currently in effect or hereinafter enacted.

3.16 Labor Certification. By its signature hereunder, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code, which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker’s Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

3.17 Authority to Enter Agreement. Consultant has all requisite power and authority to conduct its business and to execute, deliver, and perform the Agreement. Each Party warrants that the individuals who have signed this Agreement have the legal power, right, and authority to make this Agreement and bind each respective Party.

3.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 11 -

3.19 Declaration of Political Contributions. Consultant shall, throughout the term of this Agreement, submit to City an annual statement in writing declaring any political contributions of money, in-kind services, or loan made to any member of the City Council within the previous twelve-month period by the Consultant and all of Consultant’s employees, including any employee(s) that Consultant intends to assign to perform the Services described in this Agreement.

3.20 Subcontracting.

3.20.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[Signatures on following page.]
55414.00000\32996936.2
- 12 -
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Professional Services Agreement on this ____ day of __________, 2024.

CITY OF STANTON [INSERT NAME OF CONSULTANT]
By:
___________________
City Manager
By:

Name:

Title:
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary,

AND CORPORATE SEAL OF
CONSULTANT REQUIRED]
ATTEST:

By:

Patricia Vazquez
City Clerk
By:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
55414.00000\32996936.2
A-1
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
[INSERT SCOPE OF SERVICES]
55414.00000\32996936.2
B-1
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
[INSERT SCHEDULE OF SERVICES]
55414.00000\32996936.2
C-1
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION
[INSERT RATES & AUTHORIZED REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES]
55414.00000\32996936.2
D-1
EXHIBIT “D”

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Certificate holder on Certificate of Insurance shall be stated as follows:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Required insurance policies shall not be in compliance if they include an endorsement with any limiting provision (e.g., to contractual liability, “ongoing operations,” or the “sole” liability of Consultant) or exclusion (e.g., cross-liability) contrary to the Agreement, unless such endorsements are approved by the City. Endorsements shall read as follows:

Additional Insured:
• City of Stanton its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement. OR • Any person or organization as required by written agreement/contract. (Blanket coverage)
[Note: Use Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 20 26 04 13, or a form at least as broad.]
Primary and Non-Contributory:
• It is agreed that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stanton shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, insurance provided by this policy. [Note: Use ISO form CG 20 01 04 13, or a form at least as broad.] Waiver of Subrogation:
• We [the insurer] waive any right of recovery we may have against the City of Stanton because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of you ongoing operations or “your work” done under a contract with that person or organization and included in the “products-completed operations hazard”. [Note: Use ISO form CG __ __ __ __, or a form at least as broad.] Commercial General Liability
Coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 0001. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.
55414.00000\32996936.2
D-2
 A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Additional Insured Endorsement with policy # indicated  Primary Non-Contributory Endorsement with policy # indicated  Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  $1,000,000 limit per occurrence
 $2,000,000 aggregate per project
 Self-Insured Retention information (Must be declared on certificate of insurance when applicable – waiver and current audited financial report required if over $50,000) Automobile Liability
Coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CA 0001.  A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Additional Insured Endorsement with policy # indicated  Primary Non-Contributory Endorsement with policy # indicated  Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  Shall cover “Any Auto” (unless otherwise exempted by the City)  $1,000,000 limit per occurrence
 Self-Insured Retention information (Must be declared on certificate of insurance when applicable – waiver and current audited financial report required if over $50,000) Workers’ Compensation/Employers’ Liability
 A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  “Statutory” is checked for Workers’ Compensation
 $1,000,000 limit per occurrence for Employers’ Liability Professional Liability
Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed. If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of 55414.00000\32996936.2
D-3
the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
 A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  $1,000,000 per occurrence
 $1,000,000 aggregate
 Self-Insured Retention information (Must be declared on certificate of insurance when applicable – waiver and current audited financial report required if over $50,000) Technology Errors & Omissions
Not applicable.

Cyber/Network Security & Privacy Liability
Not applicable.

Sexual Misconduct
Not applicable.

Employee Dishonesty & Crime
Not applicable.
55414.00000\32996936.2

CITY OF STANTON

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
FOR

COUNCIL CHAMBER AUDIO SYSTEM RENOVATION SERVICES

1. PARTIES AND DATE.

This Agreement is made and entered into this 9th day of July, 2024, by and between the City of Stanton, a municipal organization organized under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 7800 Katella Avenue, Stanton, California 90680 (“City”) and Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc, a California S-Corporation, with its principal place of business at 2525 W. Burbank Boulevard, Burbank, CA 91505 (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.”

2. RECITALS.

2.1 Consultant.

2.2 Project.

City desires to engage Consultant to render such services for the Council Chamber Audio System Renovation project (“Project”) as set forth in this Agreement.

3. TERMS.

3.1 Scope of Services and Term.

3.1.2 Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from July 9, 2024 to July 9, 2025, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The City Manager shall have the unilateral option, at its sole discretion, to renew this Agreement annually for no more than two additional one-year terms. Consultant shall complete the Services within the term of this Agreement, and shall meet any other established schedules and deadlines.

Attachment: B
Click here to return to the agenda.
- 2 - 55414.00000\32996936.2

3.2 Responsibilities of Consultant.

3.2.1 Independent Contractors, Control and Payment of Subordinates; Independent Contractor. The Services shall be performed by Consultant or under its supervision.

3.2.3 Conformance to Applicable Requirements. All work prepared by Consultant shall be subject to the approval of City.

The key personnel for performance of this Agreement are as follows: Hovik Mirzakhanian, Vice President.
- 3 - 55414.00000\32996936.2

3.2.5 City’s Representative. The City hereby designates the City Manager, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“City’s Representative”). City’s Representative shall have the power to act on behalf of the City for all purposes under this Contract. The City Manager hereby designates Patricia A. Vazquez, City Clerk, or his or her designee, as the City’s contact for the implementation of the Services hereunder. Consultant shall not accept direction or orders from any person other than the City’s Representative or his or her designee.

3.2.6 Consultant’s Representative. Consultant hereby designates Hovik Mirzakhanian, Vice President, or his or her designee, to act as its representative for the performance of this Agreement (“Consultant’s Representative”). Consultant’s Representative shall have full authority to represent and act on behalf of the Consultant for all purposes under this Agreement. The Consultant’s Representative shall supervise and direct the Services, using his best skill and attention, and shall be responsible for all means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures and for the satisfactory coordination of all portions of the Services under this Agreement.

3.2.9 Laws and Regulations. Consultant shall keep itself fully informed of and in compliance with all local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations in any manner affecting the performance of the Project or the Services, including all Cal/OSHA requirements, and shall give all notices required by law. Consultant shall be liable for all violations of such laws and regulations in connection with Services. If the Consultant performs any work knowing it to be contrary to such laws, rules and regulations, Consultant shall be solely responsible for all costs arising therefrom. Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold City, its officials, directors, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers free and harmless, pursuant to the indemnification - 4 - 55414.00000\32996936.2
provisions of this Agreement, from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with such laws, rules or regulations.

3.2.10 Insurance.

In the event that the Consultant’s operations are suspended for failure to maintain required insurance coverage, the Consultant shall not be entitled to an extension of time for completion of the Services because of production lost during suspension.

3.3 Fees and Payments.

3.3.1 Compensation. Consultant shall receive compensation, including authorized reimbursements, for all Services rendered under this Agreement at the rates set forth i ,Exhibit “C” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The total compensation shall not exceed SEVENY EIGHT THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-FOUR DOLLARS, THIRTY CENTS $(78,184.30)
(“Total Compensation”) without written approval of City’s City Manager. Extra Work may be authorized, as described below, and if authorized, will be compensated at the rates and manner set forth in this Agreement.
- 6 - 55414.00000\32996936.2

3.3.2 Payment of Compensation. Consultant shall submit to City a monthly itemized statement which indicates work completed and hours of Services rendered by Consultant.

3.3.3 Reimbursement for Expenses. Consultant shall not be reimbursed for any expenses unless authorized in writing by City.

Consultant shall not perform, nor be compensated for, Extra Work without written authorization from the City.

3.4 Accounting Records.

3.5 General Provisions.

3.5.1 Termination of Agreement.

Consultant:

Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc.
2525 W. Burbank Boulevard
Burbank, CA 91505
Attn: Hovik Mirzakhanian, Vice President
City:

City of Stanton
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Attn: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
Such notice shall be deemed made when personally delivered or when mailed, forty-eight (48) hours after deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class postage prepaid and addressed to the party at its applicable address. Actual notice shall be deemed adequate notice on the date actual notice occurred, regardless of the method of service.

3.5.3 Ownership of Materials and Confidentiality.

3.5.3.1 Documents & Data; Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, and other intellectual property embodied in plans, - 8 - 55414.00000\32996936.2
specifications, studies, drawings, estimates, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including, but not limited to, physical drawings or data magnetically or otherwise recorded on computer diskettes, which are prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant under this Agreement (“Documents & Data”). Consultant shall require all subconsultants to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for any Documents & Data the subconsultant prepares under this Agreement. Consultant represents and warrants that Consultant has the legal right to license any and all Documents & Data.

3.5.6 Indemnification.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City’s choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any alleged acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's Services, the Project or this Agreement, including without limitation the payment of all damages, expert witness fees and attorneys fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by the Consultant or the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers.

3.5.8 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue shall be in Orange County.

3.5.9 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

3.6 City’s Right to Employ Other Consultants. City reserves right to employ other consultants in connection with this Project.

3.7 Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the parties.

3.9 Construction; References; Captions. Since the Parties or their agents have participated fully in the preparation of this Agreement, the language of this Agreement shall be construed simply, according to its fair meaning, and not strictly for or against any Party. Any term - 10 - 55414.00000\32996936.2
referencing time, days or period for performance shall be deemed calendar days and not work days.

3.10 Amendment; Modification. No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing and signed by both Parties.

3.12 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. There are no intended third-party beneficiaries of any right or obligation assumed by the Parties.

3.18 Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original.

3.20 Subcontracting.

3.20.1 Prior Approval Required. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work required by this Agreement, except as expressly stated herein, without prior written approval of City. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement.
[Signatures on following page.]
- 12 - 55414.00000\32996936.2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Professional Services Agreement on this day of , 2024.

CITY OF STANTON MATRIX AUDIO VISUAL DESIGNS, INC.

By:

Hannah Shin-Heydorn
City Manager
By:

Hovik Mirzakhanian
Vice President
By:

Treasurer/Secretary
[If Corporation, TWO SIGNATURES,
President OR Vice President AND Secretary,

AND CORPORATE SEAL OF
CONSULTANT REQUIRED]
ATTEST:

By:

Patricia A. Vazquez
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
A-1
55414.00000\32996936.2
EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
The project scope of work includes installing a comprehensive audio distribution system designed to optimize communication and presentation capabilities.

The following is a summary of services and work.

We are immensely grateful for the chance to offer our proposed solution to fulfill your AV needs. At Matrix AV, our primary focus is on you, the customer, and we take pride in our commitment to providing you with exceptional service.

Our business revolves around delivering cutting-edge Technology Service Solutions, and it's not just a slogan; it's our ethos. Thank you for considering us, and we look forward to serving you with our best possible efforts.

Information worth mentioning.

Notice of Confidentiality:

Please note that the information contained in this communication/proposal is strictly confidential and intended solely for your use. It should not be shared with any third party, including our competitors. We have dedicated significant time, effort, and resources to training, education, and staying up-to-date with the latest technology to deliver the best solutions to our clients.

The drawings, specifications, concepts, designs, and arrangements included herein are the tangible property of Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc. They are solely intended for use in the project for which they have been developed and prepared. No part of this material may be copied, disclosed, or used in connection with any other work or project without the express written consent of Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc.

By accessing these drawings or specifications, you acknowledge and accept these confidentiality restrictions. Please ensure that all members of your team are aware of these terms and that they comply with them.

Training: At Matrix AV, we believe that training is an essential part of any successful project, regardless of its size or complexity. That's why we are committed to providing tailored training solutions that meet the specific needs of our customers. Whether you have a small or large project, our team will work closely with you to identify your unique training requirements and develop a comprehensive plan to ensure your team is fully equipped to operate and maintain your new system effectively. Our goal is to provide you with a seamless experience from start to finish and beyond.

Source code and configuration files: At Matrix AV, we understand the importance of the source code, configuration files, and other programming components that comprise the audio, video, and control systems we design and install. We believe that our customers should have full ownership of these essential components to ensure they can maintain and upgrade their systems over time. Therefore, we provide our customers with complete access to the source code, configuration files, DSP files, and network topology files associated with their systems. We will work with you to ensure that you have all the information you need to manage your system effectively and provide ongoing support as needed.

Finally, our promise to you
At Matrix AV, we are committed to providing our customers with exceptional service and expertise. Our promise to you includes conducting ourselves in a professional and respectful manner at all times. We only use reputable manufacturers from the AV and IT industries who stand behind their products, ensuring that you receive a professionally designed and installed system that meets your specific needs.

We are committed to an unbiased decision-making process when selecting equipment, and we always strive to be truthful and accurate in all aspects of our work. Our team is dedicated to staying up-to-date with the latest advancements in technology and continuing to improve our technical knowledge and skills.

Finally, we are committed to educating the public about the AV industry and the benefits of implementing high-quality audio and visual solutions in various settings. Our goal is to provide you with a reliable, efficient, and cost-effective system that enhances your operations and exceeds your expectations.

B-1
55414.00000\32996936.2
EXHIBIT “B”

SCHEDULE OF SERVICES
Services and work shall begin promptly at the start of the term of this Agreement estimated per the following attachment.
,' 7DVN
0RGH
7DVN1DPH 'XUDWLRQ 6WDUW )LQLVK 3UHGH5HVRXUFH1DPHV
3KDVH,

$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
GD\V :HG 7XH
&RQWUDFW$ZDUG GD\ :HG :HG &LW\RI6WDQWRQ 2UGHU0DWHULDO GD\V 7KX )UL 0DWUL[$9$GPLQ 0HHWLQJZLWK&LW\ )DFLOLW\
GD\ :HG :HG 0DWUL[$9&LW\RI6WDQWRQ 6KRS'UDZLQJV ZNV 7KX :HG 5RGQH\ ,QWHUIDFH'HVLJQ GD\V 7KX 7XH 6HYDQ ,QWHUIDFHDSSURYDO GD\V :HG 7KX &LW\RI6WDQWRQ 0DWHULDO(7$ ZNV 0RQ )UL 0DWUL[$9$GPLQ
'HYLFHFRQILJXUDWLRQ
DQGILUPZDUHXSGDWH
GD\V 0RQ 7XH 1DUEHK
3KDVH,,
,QVWDOODWLRQ GD\V 0RQ
:HG
6LWH6XUYH\ GD\ 0RQ
0RQ
0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP :LUH /DEHO GD\V 7XH 0RQ 0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP 7HUPLQDWLRQ GD\V 7XH :HG 0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP 'HYLFH,QVWDOODWLRQ GD\V :HG 7XH 0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP &RPPLVVLRQLQJ GD\V :HG 7KX 0DWUL[$9&RPP(QJLQHHU 3KDVH,,, 6\VWHP
3URJUDPPLQJ

GD\V )UL :HG

3URJUDPPLQJ GD\V )UL 0RQ
6HYDQ 7URXEOHVKRRWLQJ GD\V 7XH
:HG
6HYDQ
3KDVH,9
6XEVWDQWLDO
&RPSOHWLRQ
GD\V 7KX
0RQ

3XQFK/LVW GD\V 7KX
)UL
9DKH 7UDLQLQJ KUV 0RQ

0RQ

5RGQH\ 6LJQ2II KU 0RQ

0RQ

9DKH
3KDVH,
$GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
&LW\RI6WDQWRQ
&RQWUDFW$ZDUG
0DWUL[$9$GPLQ
2UGHU0DWHULDO
0DWUL[$9&LW\RI6WDQWRQ
0HHWLQJZLWK&LW\)DFLOLW\
5RGQH\
6KRS'UDZLQJV
6HYDQ
,QWHUIDFH'HVLJQ
&LW\RI6WDQWRQ
,QWHUIDFHDSSURYDO
0DWUL[$9$GPLQ
0DWHULDO(7$
1DUEHK
'HYLFHFRQILJXUDWLRQDQGILUPZDUHXSGDWH
3KDVH,,
,QVWDOODWLRQ
0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP
6LWH6XUYH\
0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP
:LUH /DEHO
0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP
7HUPLQDWLRQ
0DWUL[$9,QVWDOODWLRQ7HDP
'HYLFH,QVWDOODWLRQ
0DWUL[$9&RPP(QJLQHHU
&RPPLVVLRQLQJ
3KDVH,,,
6\VWHP3URJUDPPLQJ
6HYDQ
3URJUDPPLQJ
6HYDQ
7URXEOHVKRRWLQJ
3KDVH,9
6XEVWDQWLDO&RPSOHWLRQ
9DKH
3XQFK/LVW
5RGQH\
7UDLQLQJ
9DKH
6LJQ2II

$XJ
6HS

7DVN6SOLW0LOHVWRQH
6XPPDU\3URMHFW6XPPDU\,QDFWLYH7DVN
,QDFWLYH0LOHVWRQH,QDFWLYH6XPPDU\0DQXDO7DVN
'XUDWLRQRQO\0DQXDO6XPPDU\5ROOXS0DQXDO6XPPDU\
6WDUWRQO\)LQLVKRQO\([WHUQDO7DVNV
([WHUQDO0LOHVWRQH'HDGOLQH3URJUHVV
0DQXDO3URJUHVV
3DJH
3URMHFW
&LW\RI6WDQWRQ(VWLPDWHG3URMHFW7LP'DWH
:HG
C-1
55414.00000\32996936.2
EXHIBIT “C”

COMPENSATION
Project fees based on the Scope of Services outlined in Exhibit “A” shall include one year of standard warranty for parts and labor, excluding batteries and other consumable items.

Total fees shall also include the optional Silver Level Services Agreement which includes one year of quarterly maintenance, cleaning, projector filter cleaning, checking all wires and connectors are snug, confirmation of system operation, performing major firmware updates Date
City of Stanton
Date
Client: Contractor: Matrix Audio Visual Designs, Inc.

CSLB #: 765990
City of Stanton
Name:

Hovik Mirzakhanian
Name:

Equipment: $38,754.01
Project Summary
Miscellaneous: $1,937.69
Sales Tax: $3,560.52
Electronic Waste Fee: $4.00
Shipping: $388.00
Labor: $28,281.50
Bond: $1,546.58
Sales tax is calculated based on the current sales tax and it is subject to change Grand Total: $74,472.30
Payment Schedule Amount
Inital Deposit $33,512.54
Progress Payment - 50% progress $3,723.62
Final Payment $37,236.14
Optional Service Level Agreements Amount
Silver SLA - Includes quarterly maintenance, cleaning, projector filter cleaning, checking all wires and connectors are snug, confirmation of system operation, performing major firmware updates, Minor repairs. See our extended service level agreement detail. Period of performance: One Year.
1 $3,712.00
D- 55414.00000\32996936.2
EXHIBIT “D”

INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
Certificate holder on Certificate of Insurance shall be stated as follows:

Additional Insured:
• City of Stanton its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be additional insureds with regard to liability and defense of suits or claims arising out of the performance of the Agreement. OR • Any person or organization as required by written agreement/contract. (Blanket coverage)
[Note: Use Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CG 20 26 04 13, or a form at least as broad.]
Primary and Non-Contributory:
• It is agreed that any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City of Stanton shall apply in excess of, and not contribute with, insurance provided by this policy. [Note: Use ISO form CG 20 01 04 13, or a form at least as broad.] Waiver of Subrogation:
• We [the insurer] waive any right of recovery we may have against the City of Stanton because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of you ongoing operations or “your work” done under a contract with that person or organization and included in the “products-completed operations hazard”. [Note: Use ISO form CG , or a form at least as broad.]
D- 55414.00000\32996936.2
Commercial General Liability
Coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CG 0001. Defense costs shall be paid in addition to the limits.
 A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Additional Insured Endorsement with policy # indicated  Primary Non-Contributory Endorsement with policy # indicated  Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  $1,000,000 limit per occurrence
 $2,000,000 aggregate per project
 Self-Insured Retention information (Must be declared on certificate of insurance when applicable – waiver and current audited financial report required if over $50,000) Automobile Liability
Coverage shall be at least as broad as ISO Form CA 0001.  A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Additional Insured Endorsement with policy # indicated  Primary Non-Contributory Endorsement with policy # indicated  Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  Shall cover “Any Auto” (unless otherwise exempted by the City)  $1,000,000 limit per occurrence
 Self-Insured Retention information (Must be declared on certificate of insurance when applicable – waiver and current audited financial report required if over $50,000) Workers’ Compensation/Employers’ Liability
 A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  “Statutory” is checked for Workers’ Compensation
 $1,000,000 limit per occurrence for Employers’ Liability D- 55414.00000\32996936.2
Professional Liability
Covered professional services shall specifically include all work to be performed under the Agreement and delete any exclusions that may potentially affect the work to be performed. If coverage is written on a claims-made basis, the retroactive date shall precede the effective date of the initial Agreement and continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended reporting period will be exercised for a period of at least three (3) years from termination or expiration of this Agreement.
 A.M. Best Rating; A-/VIII minimum
 Waiver of Subrogation Endorsement with policy # indicated  $1,000,000 per occurrence
 $1,000,000 aggregate
 Self-Insured Retention information (Must be declared on certificate of insurance when applicable – waiver and current audited financial report required if over $50,000) Technology Errors & Omissions
Not applicable.

Cyber/Network Security & Privacy Liability
Not applicable.

Sexual Misconduct
Not applicable.

Employee Dishonesty & Crime
Not applicable.

CITY OF STANTON

REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
DATE: July 9, 2024
SUBJECT: ADOPT THE 2024 SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATE AND APPROVE THE

SEWER SYSTEM MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE
REPORT IN BRIEF:

A Sewer Master Plan assesses the capacity and condition of the City’s sewer collection system incorporating updated housing element information and provides recommendations to address deficiencies. It is a valuable planning tool for the City’s Capital Improvement Program and managing the sewer system for future development. Furthermore, the City’s General Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 2006-003 mandates the development and implementation of a Sewer System Management Plan.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

1. City Council declare this action to be categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15378(b)(5) (Organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment); and

2. Adopt the 2024 Sewer Master Plan Update.

BACKGROUND:

At its meeting on January 11, 2022, the City Council approved the award of a Professional Services Agreement with NV5 to provide an updated Sewer Master Plan in the amount of $499,265.

At its meeting on May 9, 2023, the City Council approved a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with NV5 to fund additional services, increasing the contract amount to $838,986.

The City currently operates and maintains a sewer collection system that serves 3.1 square miles of the City and portions of the adjacent cities of Anaheim and Garden Grove discharges into the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). This network of sanitary sewers serves approximately 39,000 residents and is comprised of over 50 miles of sewer Item: 12A
Click here to return to the agenda.
pipes ranging in size from 6 inches to 24 inches in diameter with approximately 1,100 manholes. The sewer system has 14 inverted siphons that are used to cross existing stormwater channels.

The City is a member agency of the OCSD, which provides wastewater service to the City.

In 2013, the City completed its Sewer Master Plan Update. Since that time, new legislation and associated requirements have impacted wastewater generation and sewer master planning. California Senate Bill 7 (Water Conservation Act of 2009) and California’s recent addendum to the General Waste Discharge Requirements (GWDR), known as Sanitary Sewer Order 2006-0003, prescribe required activities for the operation, maintenance, and expansion of sewerage collection systems. This amendment to the State’s GWDR is in response to the Federal Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) initiative mandated through the Environmental Protection Agency. Each State was required to adopt the federal program or develop its own to comply with all CMOM components. The basic components required by the adopted California Order to comply with CMOM are within the proposed 2024 Sewer Master Plan Update.

The overall goal of implementing a Sewer Master Plan is to evaluate the existing condition of the sewer system, ensure adequate capacity exists to effectively collect and transport sewage generated in the City, and identify and plan for needed capital improvements to the system. The plan also helps to ensure that the City remains compliant with new and constantly changing State regulations related to sewer system management and ensure there is adequate capacity for future development.

ANALYSIS/JUSTIFICATION:

NV5 has completed the 2024 Sewer Master Plan Update and found that overall, the City’s sewer system has sufficient capacity. It also describes the negligible impact of additional wastewater flow from Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and discusses how the Master Plan Update accounted for the additional flow that would be generated by new housing units required to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). Additionally, the pipeline condition assessment summarized that approximately 35% of sewer pipelines require improvements such as point repairs, rehabilitation or replacement. The following sewer improvement projects are recommended to be constructed over the next 10 years:

CIP No. Street Description
Total Cost
($2024)
CIP-001 Various Sewer Point Repair Program
(Severity E) $600,000
CIP-002 Via Kannela, Via
Irana
Replace 1,509 LF of 8" concrete sewer
pipes (Severity E) $1,600,000
CIP-003 Beach Boulevard Replace 335 LF of 10" VCP sewer pipe (Severity E) $420,000
CIP-004 Cerritos Avenue Replace 527 LF of 8" VCP sewer pipes (Severity E) $600,000
CIP-005 Various Sewer Point Repair Program
(Severity D) $1,480,000
CIP-006 Various Sewer Pipeline Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program (Severity D) $12,500,000
CIP-007 Various Sewer Manhole Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program $1,700,000
Total $18,900,000
The City understands its responsibility to address infrastructure needs with long range planning efforts. By reviewing its existing sanitary sewer system and focusing on future needs, the City can continue to maintain a high level of service and reliability in its sewer system in a cost effective and fiscally responsible manner. The 2024 Sewer Master Plan Update has been developed to assist the City in achieving these objectives. The City is in the process of selecting a consultant to perform a sewer rate study.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action; however, the implementation of the plan will have a substantial fiscal impact. The estimated cost to implement all future projects recommended for the Capital Improvement Program totals $18,900,000. This cost would primarily be absorbed by the Sewer Maintenance Fund (#501) and Sewer Capital Improvement Fund (#502) through the assessment of future sewer service charges to the City’s customers. If approved, the 2024 Sewer Master Plan will be included in the City’s cost of sewer system costs during the completion of the multiyear sewer service rate study planned for Fiscal Year 2024-25.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

None.

LEGAL REVIEW:

None.

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION:

Notifications and advertisement were performed as prescribed by law.

STRATEGIC PLAN OBJECTIVES:

Obj. No. 3: Provide a quality infrastructure.

Obj. No. 6: Maintain and promote a responsive, high-quality, and transparent government.

Prepared by: Cesar Rangel P.E., Director of Public Works/City Engineer Fiscal Impact Reviewed by: Michelle Bannigan, Finance Director Approved by: Hannah Shin-Heydorn, City Manager
ATTACHMENT:

A. Draft 2024 Sewer Master Plan
15092 Avenue of Science, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92128
PROJECT NUMBER 227522-00001381.00

CITY OF STANTON SEWER MASTER PLAN UPDATE - DRAFT
2024
Prepared For:

CITY OF STANTON
Public Works Director/City Engineer
7800 Katella Avenue
Stanton, CA 90680
Attachment: A
Click here to return to the agenda.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | i

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................ES-1

1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Sewer Master Plan Purpose / Objectives..................................................................................... 1

1.2 Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2

1.3 Report Organization......................................................................................................................... 4

1.4 Regulatory Requirements............................................................................................................... 4

1.5 Environmental Compliance ............................................................................................................ 5

2.0 Study Area ............................................................................................................................................. 6

2.1 Study Area Overview........................................................................................................................ 6

2.1.1 Topographical Description...................................................................................................... 6

2.1.2 Geotechnical Information....................................................................................................... 7

2.1.3 Climate ...................................................................................................................................... 7

2.1.4 Population................................................................................................................................. 7

2.2 Orange County Flood Control District Facilities ........................................................................... 9

2.3 Golden State Water COMPANY Facilities ...................................................................................11

2.4 City of Stanton Tributary Sewer Basins.......................................................................................11

2.5 Land Use ..........................................................................................................................................15

2.5.1 Residential Land Use.............................................................................................................18

2.5.2 General Commercial Land Use ............................................................................................18

2.5.3 Mixed - Use..............................................................................................................................18

2.5.4 Industrial Land Use................................................................................................................19

2.5.5 Open Space Recreation ........................................................................................................19

2.5.6 Public / Institutional..............................................................................................................19

3.0 Summary of Wastewater Assets......................................................................................................20

3.1 Wastewater Collection System ....................................................................................................20

3.2 Collection System Characteristics ...............................................................................................22

3.3 WasteWater Collection System Siphons ....................................................................................26

3.4 Interagency Flow Locations ..........................................................................................................28

3.5 Thunderbird Lane Relief Sewer....................................................................................................30

4.0 Wastewater Generation Analysis.....................................................................................................31

4.1 Flow Monitoring ..............................................................................................................................31

4.1.1 Metered Basins.......................................................................................................................33

4.2 Wastewater Generation Rates.....................................................................................................34

4.2.1 Recommended Wastewater Generation Rates ................................................................35

4.3 Impact of Accessory Dwelling Units ............................................................................................36

4.4 RHNA Units......................................................................................................................................36

5.0 Sewer Design Criteria ........................................................................................................................37

5.1 Design Criteria Background..........................................................................................................37

5.2 Gravity Sewer Design Criteria.......................................................................................................37

6.0 Hydraulic Model Update ....................................................................................................................39

6.1 Background .....................................................................................................................................39

6.2 Methodology....................................................................................................................................39 NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ii

6.3 Limitations of Hydraulic Modeling...............................................................................................39

6.4 Model Update..................................................................................................................................40

6.4.1 Hydraulic Model Elements....................................................................................................40

6.5 Wastewater Load Allocation.........................................................................................................42

6.5.1 Schools ....................................................................................................................................43

6.5.2 Outside Agencies ...................................................................................................................43

6.5.3 Planned Projects ....................................................................................................................46

6.6 Model Calibration ...........................................................................................................................47

6.6.1 Dry Weather Flow Calibration ..............................................................................................47

6.6.2 Wet Weather Flow Loading and Calibration......................................................................48

6.7 Peaking Factors..............................................................................................................................49

7.0 Hydraulic / Capacity Analysis ...........................................................................................................50

7.1 Evaluation Criteria..........................................................................................................................50

7.2 Capacity Analysis............................................................................................................................50

7.3 Capacity Analysis Findings............................................................................................................54

7.3.1 Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) Conditions ......................................................................54

7.3.2 Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) Conditions....................................................................55

7.4 Recommendations for Pipelines with Capacity Deficiencies..................................................55

8.0 Pipeline Condition Assessment........................................................................................................58

8.1 Background .....................................................................................................................................58

8.2 Inspection and Assessment..........................................................................................................58

8.2.1 Inspection Criteria and Procedures.....................................................................................58

8.3 Pipeline Condition Assessment Summary .................................................................................60

9.0 Operation and Maintenance Program.............................................................................................64

9.1 Background .....................................................................................................................................64

9.2 Ownership and Maintenance........................................................................................................64

9.3 Summary of Operation and Maintenance Program .................................................................64

9.3.1 Review of Cleaning/Preventive Maintenance Program...................................................64

9.4 Summary of Inspection and Assessment Program..................................................................65

9.4.1 Pipeline Inspection Criteria and Documentation Procedures.........................................66

9.4.2 Documentation of Inspection Findings...............................................................................66

9.5 Condition Assessment of Manholes............................................................................................69

10.0 Capital Improvement Program (CIP)...............................................................................................70

10.1 Cost Development..........................................................................................................................70

10.1.1 Unit Construction Costs.........................................................................................................70

10.1.2 Construction Contingency.....................................................................................................71

10.1.3 Costs for Design, Construction Management and Administration.................................71

10.2 CIP Projects .....................................................................................................................................71

10.2.1 Criteria for CIP Projects.........................................................................................................71

10.2.2 Recommended CIP Projects ................................................................................................72

10.3 Summary of CIP Costs...................................................................................................................74 NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | iii

LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1 OCFCD Storm Drain Channels....................................................................................................... 9 Table 2-2 Land Use Composition..................................................................................................................16 Table 3-1 Wastewater Collection System by Pipe Diameter ...................................................................20 Table 3-2 Wastewater Collection System by Pipe Material .....................................................................22 Table 3-3 Locations of Flow Diversions .......................................................................................................24 Table 3-4 Wastewater Collection System Siphons....................................................................................26 Table 3-5 Interagency Inflow Locations.......................................................................................................28 Table 4-1 Flow Monitoring Locations...........................................................................................................31 Table 4-2 Flow Monitoring Locations and Flows........................................................................................35 Table 4-3 Recommended Wastewater Unit Generation Rates ...............................................................36 Table 5-1 Design Criteria – Gravity Sewers ................................................................................................38 Table 6-1 School Loads..................................................................................................................................43 Table 6-2 Summary of Average Dry Weather Flows from Anaheim and Garden Grove......................45 Table 6-3 Planned Projects ...........................................................................................................................46 Table 6-4 Dry and Wet Weather Peaking Factors .....................................................................................49 Table 7-1 Pipelines Not Meeting Evaluation Criteria for Dry Weather Conditions ...............................54 Table 7-2 Pipelines Not Meeting Evaluation Criteria for Wet Weather Conditions ..............................54 Table 8-1 Pipeline Condition Severity Rating .............................................................................................59 Table 8-2 Pipeline Condition Assessment Severity Criteria .....................................................................59 Table 8-3 Preliminary Recommendation Criteria......................................................................................60 Table 8-4 Pipelines Inspected.......................................................................................................................61 Table 8-5 Condition Assessment - Severity Ratings Summary................................................................61 Table 8-6 Condition Assessment - Preliminary Recommendations Summary.....................................62 Table 10-1 Pipeline Replacement Unit Costs.............................................................................................70 Table 10-2 Rehabilitation Unit Costs ...........................................................................................................71 Table 10-3 Manhole Unit Costs.....................................................................................................................71 Table 10-4 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Cost Summary ............................................................74 NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | iv

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1 City of Stanton Overview............................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2-1 Soil Type .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2-2 OCSD Drainage Basins and Facilities .......................................................................................14 Figure 2-3 General Plan Land Use................................................................................................................17 Figure 3-1 Wastewater Collection System by Pipe Diameter..................................................................21 Figure 3-2 Wastewater Collection System by Pipe Material....................................................................23 Figure 3-3 Locations of Flow Diversions......................................................................................................25 Figure 3-4 Wastewater Collection System Siphons ..................................................................................27 Figure 3-5 Interagency Inflow Locations .....................................................................................................29 Figure 4-1 Location of Temporary Flow Meters .........................................................................................32 Figure 6-1 Elements of the Hydraulic Model ..............................................................................................41 Figure 6-2 Average Dry Weather Diurnal Curves .......................................................................................47 Figure 6-3 Calibrated Diurnal Curve.............................................................................................................48 Figure 7-1 Planned Developments...............................................................................................................52 Figure 7-2 Vacant Parcels..............................................................................................................................53 Figure 7-3 Hydraulic Deficiencies for Peak Dry Weather Conditions .....................................................56 Figure 7-4 Hydraulic Deficiencies for Peak Wet Weather Conditions ....................................................57 Figure 8-1 Condition Assessment – Severity Rating Summary...............................................................61 Figure 8-2 Condition Assessment – Preliminary Recommendations Summary ..................................62 Figure 8-3 Condition Assessment – Preliminary Recommendations and Severity Ratings...............63 Figure 9-1 Owner and Maintenance Responsibilities ...............................................................................67 Figure 9-2 High Frequency Maintenance Locations ..................................................................................68 NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | v

APPENDICES
Appendix 1 - City of Stanton Planned Developments
Appendix 2 - Vacant Parcels
Appendix 3 - Capacity Analysis – Model Results
Appendix 4 - Condition Assessment Findings and Preliminary Recommendations Appendix 5 - Cooperative Sanitary Sewer Agreement
Appendix 6 - High Frequency Maintenance Locations
Appendix 7 - Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects Appendix 8 – Projected Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Expenditures NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | vi

ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AC Acres
ADWF Average Dry Weather Flow
AMSL Above Mean Sea Level
BMP Best Management Practices
CCTV Closed Circuit Television
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CFS Cubic Feet per Second
CIP Capital Improvement Program
City City of Stanton
County County of Orange
CWEA California Water Environment Association
d/D Depth of flow over pipe diameter
Dia Diameter
DIP Ductile Iron Pipe
D/S Downstream
DU Dwelling Units
EDU Equivalent Dwelling Units
EIR Environmental Impact Report
FAR Floor Area Ratio
Ft Feet
FPS Feet Per Second
GIS Geographical Information System
GC General Commercial
GGSD Garden Grove Sanitary District
GPCD Gallons Per Capita Per Day
GPD Gallons Per Day
GPM Gallons Per Minute
H2S Hydrogen Sulfide
HDR High Density Residential
HFML High Frequency Maintenance Location
Hp Horsepower
Hwy Highway
I-5 Interstate 5
ID Identification
I&I Inflow and Infiltration
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | vii
In Inches
LDR Low Density Residential
MDR Medium Density Residential
MGD Million Gallons per Day
NASSCO National Association of Sewer Service Companies
O&M Operations and Maintenance
OCFCD Orange County Flood Control District
OCPW Orange County Public Works
OCSD Orange County Sanitation District
OS Open Space
PACP Pipe Assessment and Certification Program
PDWF Peak Dry Weather Flows
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride
PWWF Peak Wet Weather Flow
QA/QC Quality Assurance and Quality Control
SSMP Sanitary Sewer Management Plan
SSO Sanitary Sewer Overflow
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
Unk Unknown
U/S Upstream
VCP Vitrified Clay Pipe
WDRs Waste Discharge Requirements
WAMPSS West Anaheim Master Plan of Sewer System
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Sewer Master Plan Update (Master Plan Update) evaluates the City of Stanton’s (City’s) existing and future wastewater collection (sewer) system infrastructure needs over a 10-year planning horizon and updates the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Evaluation of the capacity and condition of the City’s sewer collection system included updating the hydraulic model with planned development projects and reviewing Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) videos of the pipelines. A summary of each chapter as well as key findings are presented below:

Chapter 1 - Introduction
This introductory chapter describes the purpose, objective, and organization of the Master Plan Update, provides background information about the City’s existing sewer system, and gives an overview of regulatory requirements.

Chapter 2 – Study Area
Chapter 2 describes the Master Plan Update study area and provides information regarding topography, soils, geology, climate, population, other existing utilities, sewer basins, and land use.

The study area, the City of Stanton, is a built-out urban suburb that consists of mostly residential, mixed-use, commercial, and industrial land. It is experiencing revitalization in its redevelopment and continues its effort to maximize the development of vacant and underutilized land. It had a population estimate of 38,914 persons in 2023 and has a population forecast of 41,300 persons for 2035.

Neighboring cities include Anaheim and Buena Park to the north, Garden Grove and Anaheim to the east, Westminster to the south and Garden Grove and Cypress to the west.

The City’s wastewater collection system is located within the Orange County Sanitation District’s (OCSD’s) Service Area 3 and the majority wastewater from the City’s system flows directly into OCSD’s wastewater collection system. The City also discharges a small amount of wastewater into Garden Grove and Anaheim sewers, which ultimately flows into OCSD’s system as well.

Chapter 3 – Summary of Wastewater Assets
Chapter 3 describes the City’s wastewater facilities, which include a network of gravity sewers, manholes, cleanouts, and siphons. Information pertaining to the characteristics of the existing wastewater collection system was obtained primarily from the City’s Geographic Information System (GIS).

Most of the City’s wastewater collection system was likely constructed during the 1950s and 1960s and consists predominantly of Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP) gravity sewer pipelines. The aging system has approximately 50.5 miles of pipelines and approximately 1,100 manholes. Pipe diameters range between 6- and 24-inches, with the majority being 8-inches. The system also has 14 inverted siphons that are used to cross existing stormwater facilities.

The City’s system also conveys a substantial amount of wastewater from the Cities of Anaheim and Garden Grove which flow into the City’s sewer system at twenty-three (23) locations.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-2
Chapter 4 – Wastewater Generation Analysis
Chapter 4 describes the temporary flow monitoring of existing wastewater flows and the methodology used to estimate wastewater generation rates. It also describes the insignificant impact of additional wastewater flow from Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and discusses how the Master Plan Update accounted for the additional flow that would be generated by new housing units required to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).

Recommended wastewater unit generation rates are listed below in Table ES-1 for each land use designation.

Table ES-1 Recommended Wastewater Unit Generation Rates Land Use Designation
Max Density
(DU/Acre)
Recommended Unit Rate
GPD/DU GPD/Acre
Low Density Residential, LDR 6 250 1,440
Medium Density Residential, MDR 11 200 1,750
High Density Residential, HDR 18 200 3,000
General Mixed-Use, GMU, GLMX2 45 (673) 200 -
North Gateway Mixed-Use, North, NGMX2 45 (903) 200 -
South Gateway Mixed-Use, South, SGMX2 60 (903) 200 -
Town Center Mixed-Use, Town2 60 (903) 200 -
General Commercial, GC N/A N/A 2,000
Industrial, I N/A N/A 700
Public/Institutional, PI N/A N/A 2,000
Open Space/Recreational, OS1 N/A N/A 0
School4 N/A N/A N/A
Note:
1 Generation rate for OS was reduced from previous master plan as it was not included in the hydraulic analysis. 2 For mixed-use zones, use parcel specific land use unit rate or dwelling unit generation rate. 3 50% bonus permitted for affordable housing.
4 For schools, use rate of 15 gpd/student.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-3
Chapter 5 – Sewer Design Criteria
Chapter 5 describes the design criteria used to evaluate the City’s gravity sewer collection system, which is summarized below in Table ES-2.

Table ES-2 Design Criteria – Gravity Sewers
Criteria for All Pipes
Pipeline Roughness Coefficient n = 0.013
Maximum d/D Ratio (PWWF), All Pipe Diameters 0.82
Criteria for Existing Pipes
Maximum d/D Ratio (PDWF), All Pipe Diameters 0.62
Criteria for New or Upsized Pipes
Maximum d/D Ratio (PDWF), Diameter < 15-inches 0.50
Maximum d/D Ratio (PDWF), Diameter ≥ 18-inches 0.62
Minimum Pipeline Diameter 8-inches
Minimum Pipeline Velocity at PDWF1 2 feet per second
1 Minimum pipeline velocity criteria shall be adhered to when feasible Chapter 6 – Hydraulic Model Update
Chapter 6 includes a description of the hydraulic model update including an overview of the hydraulic model, model development, flow allocation, calibration, and peaking factors.

The City’s existing hydraulic model was updated for this Master Plan Update using InfoSewer hydraulic modeling software. This included corrections and updates to the model network based on GIS data, available record drawings, CCTV inspections, input from City personnel, and field verifications performed by City staff. Wastewater flows were re-allocated to model manholes based on land use areas and the recommended wastewater generation rates listed in Chapter 4. Flows were also allocated specifically for schools, planned development projects, and incoming wastewater from Anaheim and Garden Grove.

The updated model was calibrated based on the wastewater flow monitoring data for both dry weather and wet weather flow conditions such that simulated and recorded wastewater flows matched to within a reasonable level of accuracy. Based on an analysis of the flow monitoring data, the following peaking relationships were selected and applied in the model:
• Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) = 1.60 x Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) • Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) = 1.40 x Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-4
Chapter 7 – Hydraulic / Capacity Analysis
Chapter 7 describes the hydraulic (capacity) analysis of the existing sewer system for existing and future flow conditions and provides recommendations for pipelines identified as hydraulically deficient. Tables ES-3 and ES-4 below show the four pipeline segments that did not meet the evaluation criteria for dry weather and wet weather flow conditions.

Table ES-3 Pipelines Not Meeting Evaluation Criteria for Dry Weather Conditions Pipe ID
Diamete
r (in)
Length
(ft)
Slope
Existing PDWF Future PDWF
Total Flow
(mgd)
Velocity
(ft/s)
d/D
Total Flow
(mgd)
Velocit
y (ft/s)
d/D
I012-I001 15 9 -0.006 0.81 1.02 1.00 0.85 1.07 1.00
W003-W002 8 364 0.002 0.26 1.69 0.64 0.26 1.69 0.64
W004-W003 8 360 0.002 0.25 1.68 0.62 0.25 1.68 0.62
W005-W004 8 338 0.002 0.25 1.68 0.62 0.25 1.68 0.62
Table ES-4 Pipelines Not Meeting Evaluation Criteria for Wet Weather Conditions Pipe ID
Diameter
(in)
Length
(ft)
Slope
Existing PWWF Future PWWF
Total
Flow
(mgd)
Velocity
(ft/s)
d/D
Total
Flow
(mgd)
Velocity
(ft/s)
d/D
I012-I001 15 9 -0.006 1.13 1.43 1.00 1.19 1.51 1.00
W003-W002 8 364 0.002 0.36 1.59 1.00 0.36 1.59 1.00
W004-W003 8 360 0.002 0.35 1.77 0.82 0.35 1.77 0.82
W005-W004 8 360 0.002 0.35 1.77 0.82 0.35 1.77 0.82
Recommendations for each deficient pipe segment are provided below.

Pipe I012-I001: Available data indicates that this 15-inch pipe segment has a reverse slope. NV5 recommends that the City survey this pipe segment and adjacent segments to verify pipeline elevations and updating the hydraulic model.

Pipes W003-W002, W004-W003, and W005-W004:

Following these tasks, the hydraulic model should be updated and the pipeline should be reevaluated to determine if the pipeline is hydraulically deficient and needs to be replaced with a larger pipeline. If required, replacement costs would be shared between the City and the Garden Grove Sanitation District per the joint-use agreement.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-5
NV5 also recommends that the City closely monitor these pipe segments to determine if there are any corresponding operations and maintenance issues with the identified capacity deficiencies.

Chapter 8 – Pipeline Condition Assessment
Chapter 8 provides a summary of the pipeline condition assessment performed for this Master Plan Update including inspection procedures, assessment criteria, severity ratings, and preliminary recommendations.

Approximately 47 miles of sewer pipeline were inspected between August 2022 and April 2024. The remaining portion of the system that was not inspected, approximately 3 miles, consists primarily of pipelines that are owned or maintained by other agencies, pipelines in private easements, and newly constructed pipelines. CCTV Video inspections were performed by National Plant Services (NPS).

Standard observations and severity ratings were documented on video inspection logs. Observations included the various locations of sewer mains with noted deficiencies. The inspection logs were independently reviewed by NV5 and each observation was assessed for its severity to assist in determining rehabilitation recommendations. For each pipe segment inspected, the video inspection log for each pipeline was analyzed by NV5 and rated to indicate the overall severity of the pipeline condition using a scale of “A” through “E”, with “A” being a good condition and “E” being a failing condition. Using the applicable observations and assigned severity rating, a preliminary recommendation for each pipeline segment was provided. Table ES-5 provides a summary of the assigned pipeline condition severity ratings based on the length of pipe inspected.

Table ES-5 Condition Assessment - Severity Ratings Summary

Severity Ratings
Total

A B C D E
Length (Miles) 7.8 15.4 16.9 5.7 1.4 47.2
Percent by Length 16.5% 32.6% 35.8% 12.1% 3.0% 100.0%
Table ES-6 provides a summary of the preliminary recommendations provided based on length of pipe inspected.

Table ES-6 Condition Assessment - Preliminary Recommendations Summary Preliminary Recommendation Length (Miles) Percentage
No Action 12.8 27.1%
Clean 15.1 32.0%
Clean and CCTV 1.1 2.3%
Root Treatment 1.8 3.8%
Rehabilitate (Lining) 8.6 18.2%
Point Repair 5.4 11.4%
Replace 2.4 5.1%
Total 47.2 100%
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-6
Based on the preliminary recommendations, approximately 38 percent of the pipelines inspected will benefit from thorough maintenance / cleaning, while approximately 35 percent require improvements including point repairs, rehabilitation, and replacement.

Chapter 9 – Operation and Maintenance Program
Chapter 9 presents an overview and a review of the City’s Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Program for its wastewater collections system including preventative maintenance (cleaning), inspection, and assessment. It also discusses the joint-use agreement between the City and the Garden Grove Sanitary District for shared operation and maintenance responsibilities.

The City’s O&M program is administered by the City’s Public Works Department which is responsible for ensuring the implementation of City and regulatory agency policies and procedures. To minimize and prevent system blockages that can lead to sewer system overflows (SSOs) the City’s O&M Program includes contracting outside services to perform routine cleaning of the collection system. This includes attention to locations that have been identified as High Frequency Maintenance Locations (HFMLs). The HFMLs include approximately 139 pipelines that have been identified as having reoccurring problems and which require more frequent maintenance and cleaning. Contracted crews clean HFMLs on a quarterly basis. The City plans to develop and refine an appropriate schedule and target for cleaning its system.

The City does not currently have a formally established CCTV Inspection and Assessment Program for sewer pipelines and manholes but employed CCTV technology for the inspection of system pipelines in 2009 and 2022/2024 for the preparation of master plan updates. It is recommended that the City consider development and implementation of an inspection program to inspect the condition of its gravity sewers on a 5-year cycle and to use the information obtained during implementation of its operations and maintenance program for identifying and prioritizing projects for the necessary improvements.

It is also recommended that the City consider development and implementation of a formal manhole inspection and assessment program to identify and prioritize manhole rehabilitations and replacements. Manholes should also be visually inspected during either maintenance and/or annual cleaning of the pipelines, information be documented, and defects noted for tracking and reporting purposes.

Chapter 10 – Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
This chapter presents a proposed 10-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for improving the City’s wastewater collection (sewer) system based on the findings of the evaluations performed for development of the Sewer Master Plan Update and includes development of a preliminary opinion of probable cost, recommended CIP projects, and a summary of CIP Costs.

Recommended CIP projects were developed based on the findings and preliminary recommendations of the sewer pipeline condition assessment discussed in Chapter 8 and input from City staff. The general criteria for development of CIP projects for sewer pipelines was to first address pipeline segments rated with a failing (“E”) condition severity as these segments have severe defects that require more immediate attention. Some pipeline segments rated with a poor (“D”) condition severity were grouped together with severity “E” replacement segments or included as separate projects.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-7
NV5 also recommends that all pipeline segments rated with a “D” or “E” condition severity be cleaned and inspected annually using CCTV technology until critical defects are addressed by CIP projects or by City operations and maintenance efforts. This should include pipeline segments assigned a “Clean and CCTV” recommendation, which are not included in the following CIP projects.

Table ES-7 below provides a summary of the project costs for each recommended CIP project. Note that these are rough order of magnitude cost opinions for preliminary planning information only and do not include inflation for future cost planning.

Table ES-7 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Cost Summary CIP
No.

Pipe
Segments
Street Description
Construction
Cost Opinion
Plus Contingency
Engineering /
CM / Admin
Total Cost
($2024)
CIP-001 Various Various Sewer Point Repair
Program (Severity E) $460,000 $140,000 $600,000
CIP-002
G010-G009,
G011-G010,
G012-G011,
G013-G012,
G014-G013,
G801-G014,
G007-G012
Via Kannela,
Via Irana
Replace 1,509 LF of 8"
concrete sewer pipes
(Severity E)
$1,240,000 $360,000 $1,600,000
CIP-003 S017-S016 Beach
Boulevard
Replace 335 LF of 10" VCP
sewer pipe (Severity E)
$320,000 $100,000 $420,000
CIP-004 B039-B002,
H107-B005
Cerritos
Avenue
Replace 527 LF of 8" VCP
sewer pipes (Severity E)
$460,000 $140,000 $600,000
CIP-005 Various Various
Sewer Point Repair
Program (Severity D)
$1,140,000 $340,000 $1,480,000
CIP-006 Various Various
Sewer Pipeline
Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program
(Severity D)
$9,600,000 $2,900,000 $12,500,000
CIP-007 N/A Various
Sewer Manhole
Replacement and
Rehabilitation Program
$1,300,000 $400,000 $1,700,000
CIP-008
W002-OC09,
W003-W002,
W004-W003,
W005-W004,
Lampson
Avenue
Upsize 1,166 LF of 8" VCP
sewer pipes
(Capacity Deficiency)
$1,200,000 $400,000 $1,600,000
Total $20,500,000
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | ES-8
The City plans to implement the recommended CIP projects over the next 10 years. Projected expenditures for the 10-year CIP program are included in Appendix 8. These preliminary projections were developed based on the estimated CIP costs listed herein, prioritizing CIP projects with severe condition deficiencies, and direction from City staff.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION
In 2013, the City of Stanton (City) completed the City of Stanton Sewer Master Plan Update (Master Plan). The Master Plan included an evaluation of the existing sanitary system, a capacity analysis, inspection, hydraulic modeling of the City’s collection system, and development of future flow projections. The Master Plan also included recommendations for pipeline improvements. Additional information pertaining to major elements of the City’s wastewater collection (sewer) system and specific system improvements was included in the Master Plan.

Due to increased growth in development, system modifications, ongoing water conservation efforts, and aging infrastructure, the City is updating its infrastructure needs and Capital Improvement Program (CIP).

Available capacity of the collection system was determined based on captured flow monitoring data and projected wastewater flow projections. Estimated flows were incorporated into the sewer model to determine the capacity improvement needs, while video pipeline inspections were conducted to identify condition related improvements needed.

This introductory chapter of the Master Plan provides a summary of the:
• Master Plan purpose and objectives
• Contents and organization of this report
• Background information about the City’s sanitary sewer system • Overview of Regulatory Requirements

1.1 SEWER MASTER PLAN PURPOSE / OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this Sewer Master Plan Update (Master Plan Update) is to reevaluate the City’s existing and future wastewater system infrastructure needs and assist the City achieve compliance with the State of California’s Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs). The Master Plan Update includes a capacity and condition assessment of the existing sewer collection system to update the CIP for the next 10-years. The recommended CIP forms the basis for capital facilities financing and can be used in sewer rate evaluations to be completed in separate financial studies. Other key objectives with preparation of the Master Plan Update are to:
• Include land use and planned development consistent with the General Plan • Incorporate current Housing Element information and update estimated wastewater flow projections
• Assess the current condition of the wastewater system and identify specific improvements over a 10 year planning horizon
• Include recommended system improvements that address existing and projected capacity constraints over a 10 year planning horizon
• Review of sewer system improvements since 2013
• Conduct, review and assess Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) data captured of the sewer system NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 2
• Conduct flow monitoring for use to estimate existing and future wastewater flow rates • Review of wastewater flow data to confirm and/or update unit wastewater generation flow rates
• Perform a hydraulic analysis of the wastewater system for existing and future (10-years) conditions
• Develop a phased improvement plan
• Estimate wastewater system improvement costs
In addition to providing City staff with information that can be used for planning, management, and operation and maintenance of its wastewater system to assure an appropriate level of service, this Master Plan Update will ultimately allow the City to:
• Address capacity issues through the update of the hydraulic model • Assess the condition of the collection system
• Strategically and systematically prioritize existing and projected improvements • Reduce the occurrences of emergency repairs
• Extend asset service life
• Minimize cost of operating, maintaining, and renewing assets • Direct budgeted resources toward sustaining the performance of assets • Facilitate development of funding and revenue plans

1.2 BACKGROUND
The City is located in in the northwestern portion of Orange County, CA. It encompasses 3.1 square miles of commercial, industrial, and residential areas and serves a population of approximately 39,000 residents.

Prior to the City’s incorporation in 1956, the City of Anaheim proposed creating a sewage farm on the County land near the residents of Benedict. In 1911, the residents responded to this proposal by incorporating as the City of Stanton, which prevented the creation of the sewage farm. In 1924, the residents voted to disincorporate which extended until 1956 when the City once again voted for the City’s incorporation. It is now operated under the general law form as mandated by the State of California.

The City operates under a Council/Manager form of government, under which the City Council is the policymaking body and the City Manager is responsible for executing Council policy. The City Council is made up of the City mayor, who is elected at large, and four (4) City Council members elected by voters in their districts.

The City continues to work to proactively and systematically maintain its wastewater infrastructure and provide an appropriate level of service to its customers. The City’s system includes approximately

50.5 miles of wastewater collection system gravity mains and pipelines and approximately 1,100 manholes. Figure 1-1 illustrates the general location of the City of Stanton and the boundary of its sanitation jurisdiction.
¬«91
¬«22
§¨¦5
§¨¦405
¬«22
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
Legend
City Boundary
Anaheim & Garden Grove Tributary Area
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 1-1
0 800 1,600
±
3,200 4,800
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
City of Stanton
Overview

CITY OF

STANTON

CITY OF

LA PALMA

CITY OF

HUNTINGTON BEACH
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 4

1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION
This Master Plan Update allows for a comprehensive review and evaluation of the City’s wastewater collection, conveyance, condition, and capacity requirements under existing and future conditions (10- years). Based on findings of the evaluation, the Master Plan Update includes recommended facility improvements and estimated capital cost requirements to assure that aging infrastructure remains serviceable and allows for the anticipated growth within the City. The findings will provide the City with information to be used for planning, management, operation and maintenance, and allocation of funding to efficiently and effectively maintain the wastewater collection system and implement capital improvements needs.

The Master Plan Update is presented in the following ten (10) chapters; • Chapter 1 provides an introduction, purpose and objectives, and background to the project. • Chapter 2 presents an overview of the study area.
• Chapter 3 presents an overview of the City’s wastewater assets. • Chapter 4 includes a description of the methodology for developing recommended unit generation rates.
• Chapter 5 presents the design criteria used to evaluate the existing sewer system and design criteria for new sewer infrastructure.
• Chapter 6 includes a description of the hydraulic model update including model calibration. • Chapter 7 presents the capacity analysis for existing and future flow conditions. • Chapter 8 includes a summary of the pipeline condition assessment performed including assessment criteria, severity ratings, and preliminary recommendations. • Chapter 9 includes an overview of the City’s Operations and Maintenance Program. • Chapter 10 includes a summary of the recommended Capital Improvement Program projects and estimated costs.

1.4 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
On May 2, 2006, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) adopted Order 2006-0003, the Statewide General Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) for Sanitary Sewer Systems, which requires all federal and state agencies, municipalities, counties, districts, and other public entities that own or operate a sanitary sewer system greater than one (1) mile in length to comply with the elements of the WDRs. The WDRs serve to provide a unified statewide approach for reporting and tracking Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO), establishing consistent and uniform requirements for Sewer System Management Plan (SSMP) development and implementation, establishing consistency in reporting, and facilitating consistent enforcement for violations. Additionally, the WDRs require that the SSMP include directives for owners and operators of sanitary sewer systems to demonstrate effective and efficient management, operation and maintenance of the sanitary sewer system.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 5
In 2008, the SWRCB issued Order No. WQ 2008-0002-EXEC to address deficiencies in the notification procedures that were originally included in the General WDR Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP).

The 2008 Order included amending the MRP requirements of the WDRs to address timely notifications of SSOs discharged to waters of the State and ensure first responders are notified in a timely manner.

Subsequently, Order No. WQ 2013-0058-EXEC was issued to address compliance and enforceability of the MRP and include a definition of a Category 3 SSO to the already defined Category 1 and Category 2.

On December 6, 2022, the SWRCB adopted General Order WQ 2022-0103-DWQ, which serves as statewide waste discharge requirements, supersedes the previous Order 2006-0003-DWQ and amendments thereafter, and became effective June 5, 2023. Through this General Order, the SWRCB requires an enrollee to:
• Comply with federal and state prohibitions of discharge of sewage to waters of the State, including federal waters of the United States;
• Comply with specifications, and notification, monitoring, reporting and recordkeeping requirements in this General Order that implement the federal Clean Water Act, the California Water Code (Water Code), water quality control plans (including Regional Water Board Basin Plans) and policies;
• Proactively operate and maintain resilient sanitary sewer systems to prevent spills; • Eliminate discharges of sewage to waters of the State through effective implementation of a Sewer System Management Plan;
• Monitor, track, and analyze spills for ongoing system-specific performance improvements; and • Report noncompliance with this General Order per reporting requirements.

The City recognizes the importance of preventing sewage spills for the mutual protection of it surface waters and the overall environment to safeguard public health and safety. In compliance with the State WDRs, the City prepared an SSMP that includes various plans and programs that are reflective of the City’s existing processes and procedures pertaining to its sanitary sewer collection system. The City conducted an update of its SSMP in June 2023. The City’s SSMP includes the eleven (11) WDR elements including a summary of the required changes and updates. The SSMP is available at the City offices and includes detailed information demonstrating the City’s efforts to comply with each of the mandatory and applicable elements required.

1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
The City’s Master Plan Update is statutorily exempt from the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or a Negative Declaration per Section 15262 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. However, the approval of specific improvement projects identified in this Master Plan Update represents a discretionary action by the City, which is subject to review under CEQA.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 6

2.0 STUDY AREA
This chapter provides a description of the Master Plan Update study area including information regarding:
• Topography, soils, geology, and climate
• Existing and forecasted populations
• Existing Storm Drain and Potable Water Facilities
• Regional sewage facilities serving the City
• Sewer basins.
• Land Use

2.1 STUDY AREA OVERVIEW
The City is located in in the northwestern portion of Orange County, CA. It encompasses approximately 1,993 acres or about 3.1 square miles of commercial, industrial, and residential areas and serves a population of approximately 39,000 residents. Neighboring cities include Anaheim and Buena Park to the north, Garden Grove and Anaheim to the east, Westminster to the south and Garden Grove and Cypress to the west.

The City is bound by several highways which provide direct access into the City from all directions. The San Diego Freeway (I-405) and Garden Grove Freeway (SR-22) are located to the south. The San Gabriel Freeway (I-605) is located to the west. The Artesia Freeway (SR-91) is located to the north. Major roads that traverse the City include Beach Boulevard, Knott Avenue, Magnolia Avenue, Katella Avenue, Cerritos Avenue, Western Avenue, and Chapman Avenue.

The Cities of Garden Grove and Anaheim contribute flows into the City’s sewer system. Approximately 660 acres of Anaheim are tributary to City’s system from the north, and approximately 563 acres of Garden Grove are tributary to the City’s system from the east and west. The total sewer service area including the tributary portions residing in the City of Anaheim and Garden Grove is approximately 1,223 acres. The southern portion of the City, located south of Stanford Avenue and east of Hoover Street, is tributary to the Garden Grove Sanitary District’s system.

2.1.1 Topographical Description
The study area is generally flat with a slope of approximately 0.18 percent. The highest ground elevation is approximately 80 feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the northeastern portion of the City, at Lola Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. The lowest ground elevation is approximately 50 feet amsl at the southwestern portion of the City at the intersection of Garden Grove Boulevard and Hoover Street.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 7

2.1.2 Geotechnical Information
Soils
Three soil classifications exist within the corporate boundaries of the City, as seen on the Hydrologic Classification of Soils, Plate A of the Orange County Hydrology Manual and Figure2-1. The descriptions of each soil type are as follows:
• Group A soils are well drained sands or gravels with high infiltration and water transmission rates. • Group B soils are generally well drained, sandy loam having moderate infiltration and water transmission rates.
• Group C soils are mostly silty-loam with slow infiltration and water transmission rates.

The soils with higher infiltration rates permit better passage of water through them to the groundwater table. Sewer lines constructed in Group A and B soils would therefore be more susceptible to infiltration through defective pipe joints and manholes than Group C soils.

The majority of the soils in the study area are Groups A and B. However, a significant concentration of Group C soil is found on the south side of the City, just north of SR-22 on either side of Beach Boulevard.

Group C soil is also found on the corner of Santa Rosalia Street and Lampson Avenue.

Geology
There are several major faults in close proximity to the City. The Newport-Inglewood Fault and Los Alamitos Fault are located south of the City. The Whittier Fault and Norwalk Fault are located to the north of the City. These faults generally run in the northwest to southeast direction.

2.1.3 Climate
The climate in the area is generally mild temperatures, virtually no days below freezing, and approximately 340 days of sunshine per year. The average annual rainfall for the City of Stanton is estimated to be approximately 13.30 inches, as measured at the Orange County Public Works (OCPW) Watershed Program, Santa Ana Station No. 121. Most of the rainfall occurs between the months of November and April.

2.1.4 Population
According to population estimates by the State of California Department of Finance, the population of Stanton was 38,914 persons in 2023, which is a decrease of approximately 0.7% since 2013. Connect SoCal, the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, developed by Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), forecasts that the City’s population will increase to 41,300 by 2035, an increase of approximately 6.1% from 2023.

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
Group A
Group B
Group C
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 2-1
Soil Type
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 9

2.2 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FACILITIES
Included in the study area are several major Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) storm drain channels, which generally drain in a northeast to southwest direction. The OCFCD storm drain channels which are located within the City boundary are included in Table 2-1. A description of each OCFCD facility is also provided below.

Table 2-1 OCFCD Storm Drain Channels
OCFCD Facility No. Facility Reference
C02P03 Knott Cerritos Storm Drain
C02P08 Dale Cerritos Storm Drain
C02S01 Stanton Storm Channel
C03 Anaheim Barber City Channel
C03P04 Chapman Beach Storm Drain
C03P05 Lampson Storm Drain
C03P06 Chapman Dale Storm Drain
C03S04 Rosalia Storm Channel
The Knott-Cerritos Storm Drain drains from the intersection of Knott Avenue and Cerritos Avenue and extends south along Knott Avenue to the Jonathan Storm Channel (OCFCD Facility No. C02S03) at the Southern Pacific Railroad. This facility consists of the following:

Knott-Cerritos Storm Drain - OCFCD Facility No. C02P03
Location Facility Description
Knott Avenue 81” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
The Dale-Cerritos Storm Drain begins at Cerritos Avenue, 250’ west of Sherrill Street. It drains west along Cerritos Avenue and south along Dale Street to the Stanton Storm Channel, south of Standustrial Street. The facility consists of the following:

Dale-Cerritos Storm Drain – OCFCD Facility No. C02P08
Location Facility Description
Cerritos Avenue Single 8’ (W) x 4.5’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) Dale Street Single 9’ (W) x 5’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) The Stanton Storm Channel (OCFCD Facility No. C02S01) conveys the flow from the Dale-Cerritos Storm Drain. It commences at Cerritos Avenue, south of Standustrial Street and extends southwest through the industrial area at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Dale Street. The Stanton Storm Channel parallels Katella Avenue to the south and exits the City limits at Knott Avenue. The facility consists of the following:

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 10
Stanton Storm Channel - OCFCD Facility No. C02S01
Location Facility Description
Cerritos Avenue Single 8’ (W) x 4.5’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) Dale Street Single 9’ (W) x 5’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) Monroe Avenue 5’ (W) x 6.5’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel Katella Avenue 5’ (W) x 7’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel Katella Avenue Crossing 11’ (W) x 7’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) South of Katella Avenue 8’ (W) x 7’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel South of Katella Avenue Crossing 6’ (W) x 7.5’ (H) reinforced concrete rectangular channel South of Katella Avenue Crossing 6’ (W) x 7.5’ (H) reinforced concrete rectangular channel Beach Boulevard Crossing 8’ (W) x 7’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) East of Beach Boulevard 5’ (W) x 7’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel Santa Rosalia Street 3.5’ (W) x 7’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel Pacific Railway 3.5’ (W) x 8.5’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel Western Avenue 8’ (W) x 7’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) Knott Avenue 6’ (W) x 8’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel The Anaheim Barber City Channel enters the City at Chapman Avenue and Dale Street and extends southwest to Lampson Avenue and the Pacific Railway where it exits the City boundary. The facility consists of the following:

Anaheim Barber City Channel - OCFCD Facility No. C03
Location Facility Description
Chapman Avenue Double 12’ (W) x 10’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) Lampson Avenue Double 12’ (W) x11’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) The Chapman-Beach Storm Drain begins at Fillmore Drive and extends west to Beach Boulevard. It then extends south along Beach Boulevard and west on Chapman Avenue, where it exits the City at Santa Paula Street. The facility consists of the following:

Chapman-Beach Storm Drain - OCFCD Facility No. C03P04
Location Facility Description
Fillmore Drive 48” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Beach Boulevard 54” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
Chapman Avenue Single 5’ (W) x 4’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 11
The Lampson Storm Drain begins at the corner of Beach Boulevard and Lampson Avenue and confluences with the Anaheim Barber City Channel on Lampson Avenue. The facility consists of the following:

Lampson Storm Drain - OCFCD Facility No. C03P05
Location Facility Description
Lampson Avenue 12’ (W) x 13’ (H) reinforced concrete trapezoidal channel The Chapman-Dale Storm Drain enters the City at the intersection of Dale Street and Chapman Avenue.

It extends westward where it confluences with the Anaheim Barber City Channel on Chapman Avenue.

The facility consists of the following:

Chapman-Dale Storm Drain - OCFCD Facility No. C03P06
Location Facility Description
Chapman Avenue 78” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP)
The Rosalia Storm Channel begins 1,500 ft north of Chapman Avenue. It parallels Santa Rosalia Street to the west and exits the City on Chapman Avenue. The facility consists of the following:

Rosalia Storm Channel (OCFCD Facility No. C03S04)
Location Facility Description
Santa Rosalia Street Double 5’ (W) x 2.7’ (H) reinforced concrete box (RCB) Numerous storm drains within the City boundary connect to the eight (8) OCFCD facilities described above. In crossing these channels and tributary storm drains, as well as other major utilities, the wastewater collection system includes several inverted siphons. The City’s siphons are described in Chapter 3 of this Master Plan Update.

2.3 GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY FACILITIES
The Golden State Water Company (Golden State Water) provides potable water service to customers in the City. Golden State Water owns and maintains water distribution and transmission pipelines throughout the City which cross and run parallel to the City’s existing sewer pipelines. For any sewer improvements project, Golden State Water should be contacted to locate existing water lines and avoid conflicts.

2.4 CITY OF STANTON TRIBUTARY SEWER BASINS
The City’s wastewater collection is located within the Orange County Sanitation District’s (OCSD’s) Service Area 3 and is generally comprised of four (4) tributary sewer basins which generally drain from the northeastern service area boundary towards the southwestern portion of the City. The five (5) OCSD facilities listed below are located within the City to which the wastewater collection system discharges. • Knott Interceptor
• Hoover - Western Subtrunk
• Lampson Interceptor
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 12
• Katella Interceptor
• Magnolia Subtrunk
General descriptions of the OCSD sewer drainage basins contributing flows to OCSD facilities are included below. Figure 2-2 graphically illustrates the OCSD drainage basins and facilities.

Katella Hoover Western Tributary Area
The Katella Hoover Western Tributary Area consists of approximately 1,181 acres within the City. The Cities of Anaheim and Garden Grove contribute wastewater from an additional 660 acres and 563 acres, respectively. The tributary area is bound by Knott Avenue, Litchfield Avenue, Oakhaven Drive, and Danbrook Drive to the west; Del Monte Drive and Ball Road to the north; Magnolia Street and Mac Street to the East; and Orangewood Avenue, Yorkshire Avenue and Hampton Way to the south. Tributary flows from Anaheim enter the City at Western Avenue, Garrett Street, Masterson Road, Courtnight Street, Beach Boulevard, Fern Avenue and Dale Street. Tributary flows from Garden Grove enter the City at Cerritos Avenue and Katella Avenue.

The Hoover-Western Subtrunk and Katella Interceptor originate at OCSD manhole (I018) located at Western Avenue and Katella Avenue. The flows are split to the west by the Katella Interceptor and to the south by the Hoover-Western Subtrunk. The Katella Hoover Western Tributary Area includes all areas that are tributary to the split manhole at this location. A brief description of the Katella Interceptor and Hoover-Western Subtrunk are as follows:

Katella Interceptor - The Katella Interceptor extends west along Katella Avenue, from Western Avenue to Knott Avenue, where the wastewater is discharged into the Knott Interceptor. The Cities of Stanton, Garden Grove, and Anaheim contribute wastewater to this 24-inch facility at Katella Avenue and Western Avenue. Since the Hoover-Western Subtrunk and Katella Interceptor originate at the same upstream manhole (I018), flows may be diverted to either facility when necessary.

Hoover-Western Subtrunk - The Hoover-Western Subtrunk collects wastewater from the Cities of Stanton, Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Westminster and conveys the flow to the Knott Interceptor. The Hoover- Western Subtrunk is located along Western Avenue, Garden Grove Boulevard, and Hoover Street, and it is parallel to the Knott Interceptor. This facility is 21- inches and 24-inches in diameter, and extends south along Western Avenue, from Katella Avenue to Simmons Place. Since the Hoover-Western Subtrunk and the Katella Interceptor originate at the same upstream manhole (I018), flows may be diverted to either facility when necessary.

Knott Tributary Area
The Knott Tributary Area includes all areas that are tributary to the Knott Interceptor via local sewers, and it is comprised of approximately 131 acres within the City of Stanton. The Knott Tributary Area is bound by Via Irana and Knott Avenue to the west; Thornton Avenue to the north; Oakhaven Drive, Litchenfield Avenue, and Hardee Way to the east; and Patterson Drive to the south. A portion of the wastewater from the Katella Hoover Western Tributary Area flows into the Knott Interceptor by means of the Katella Interceptor. A brief description of the Knott Interceptor is as follows:

Knott Interceptor - The Knott Interceptor collects wastewater from the Cities of Fullerton, Buena Park, Cypress, Stanton, Westminster, and Seal Beach. Within the City’s boundary, the NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 13
Knott Interceptor is 63-inches and 66-inches in diameter, and it is located along Knott Avenue, south of Brady Way to Hampton Way. The City contributes wastewater flows to this facility at Syracuse Avenue and at Katella Avenue.

Lampson Hoover Western Tributary Area
The Lampson Hoover Western Tributary Area includes approximately 600 acres within the City of Stanton as well as approximately 530 acres from the City of Garden Grove. The areas tributary to the Lampson Interceptor are also included in the Lampson Hoover Western Tributary Area. It is bound by Western Avenue, Hardee Way, and the Union Pacific Corridor to the west; Katella Avenue and Pacific Electric Corridor to the north; Mac Duff Street, Magnolia Street, Josephine Street, and Dale Street to the east, and Garden Grove Boulevard to the south. Tributary flows from the City of Garden Grove enter the City at Crager Lane, Chapman Avenue, Lampson Avenue, Stanford Avenue, Acacia Avenue, Fern Street, Vanguard Circle, Laurelton Avenue, Belgrave Avenue, and Fieldgate Street. Additional wastewater from the Katella Hoover Western Tributary Area flows into the Hoover-Western Subtrunk at Katella Avenue and Western Avenue. A brief description of the OCSD facilities includes the following:

Hoover-Western Subtrunk - The Hoover-Western Subtrunk collects wastewater from the Cities of Stanton, Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Westminster and conveys the flow to the Knott Interceptor. The Hoover-Western Subtrunk is located along Western Avenue, Garden Grove Boulevard, and Hoover Street, and it -inch and 24-inch in diameter, and extends south along Western Avenue, from Katella Avenue to Simmons Place. Since the Hoover-Western Subtrunk and the Katella Interceptor originate at the same upstream manhole (I018), flows may be diverted to either facility when necessary.

Lampson Interceptor - The Lampson Interceptor collects wastewater from the Cities of Stanton and Garden Grove. The facility is 15-inch to 21-inch in diameter and extends west along Lampson Avenue from Beach Boulevard to Western Avenue where the wastewater is discharge to the Hoover-Western Subtrunk. The City contributes wastewater at Beach Boulevard, Rancho 39 MHP, west of the Anaheim Barber Channel, and Santa Rosalia Street.

Magnolia Tributary Area
The Magnolia Tributary Area includes approximately 85 acres on the north-eastern end of the City. It includes the areas that are tributary Magnolia Subtrunk via City sewers. The Magnolia Tributary Area is bound by Christy Street and Annapolis Avenue to the west; Lullaby Lane to the north; Garza Street and Gilbert Street to the east; and Katella Avenue to the south. A brief description of the Magnolia Subtrunk includes the following:

Magnolia Subtrunk - The Magnolia Subtrunk collects wastewater from the Cities of Anaheim, Stanton, Garden Grove, Westminster, and Fountain Valley. It is located on the east end of the City along Magnolia Street between Lola Avenue and Katella Avenue. The City contributes wastewater to the Magnolia Subtrunk along Magnolia Avenue, at Cerritos Avenue, Pacific Avenue, Stacie Lane, and north of Katella Avenue.

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
OCSD Facilities
City Boundary
Hoover/Western Subtrunk 1 Basin
Hoover/Western Subtrunk 2 Basin
Katella Interceptor Basin
Knott Interceptor Basin
Lampson Interceptor Basin
Magnolia Subtrunk Basin
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 2-2
OCSD Drainage Basins
and Facilities
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 15

2.5 LAND USE
The Stanton General Plan (General Plan) was adopted in 2008, under Resolution No. 2008-36. The General Plan was developed to guide the City in achieving its economic and community development goals and includes specific measures and activities to meet the needs of the City’s land use, transportation, economic development, community aesthetics, housing, public facilities, and infrastructure.

The land use information utilized in the preparation of this Master Plan Update is based on the City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element, dated June 2022 and the City of Stanton General Plan (General Plan), adopted September 23, 2008. The current Housing Element dated June 2022 reflects the 2021-2029 Housing Plan includes the goals, policies, and programs the City will implement to address the City’s constraints and needs.

The City is a built-out urban suburb that is experiencing revitalization in its redevelopment and continues its effort to maximize the development of vacant and underutilized land. Currently, the City consists of mostly residential, mixed-use, commercial, and industrial land. Land use designations within the study area are categorized in Table 2-2 and shown on Figure 2-3 based on the General Plan and the City’s Zoning Code, which is used to implement the General Plan.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 16
Table 2-2 Land Use Composition
General Plan Designation
(Zoning Code Designations)
Zoning
Density
Zoning Codes Area (Ac) Percentage of Total
Low Density Residential
(Residential Estates; Single-Family
Residential)
1-6 du/ac RE, RL 436.4 22.0%
Medium Density Residential
(Medium Density Residential)

6.1-11 du/ac RM 166.4 8.4%
High Density Residential
(High Density Residential; Planned
Development)

11.1-18 du/ac RH, PD 321.8 16.2%
Subtotal Residential Use 924.6 46.6%
General Mixed-Use
(General Mixed-Use)
45 du/ac GLMX 112.5 5.7%
North Gateway Mixed-Use District
(North Gateway Mixed-Use)
45 du/ac NGMX 22.4 1.1%
South Gateway Mixed-Use District
(South Gateway Mixed-Use)
60 du/ac SGMX 92.7 4.7%
Town Center Mixed-Use District
60 du/ac 37.9 1.9%
Subtotal Mixed-Use 265.5 13.4%
General Commercial
(Commercial Neighborhood;
Commercial General)
CN, CG 55.4 2.8%
Subtotal Commercial Use 55.4 2.8%
Industrial
(Business Park; Industrial General)
BP, IG 151.8 7.6%
Subtotal Industrial Use 151.8 7.6%
Public/Institutional
(Public/Institutional)
PI 90.7 4.6%
Subtotal Public Use 90.7 4.6%
Open Space / Recreational
(Open Space/Buffer; Parks and
Recreation)
OS, PR 122.8 6.2%
Streets and Right of Ways 373.8 18.8%
Subtotal Other Use 496.6 25.0%
Total 1,984.6 100.0%
DU = Dwelling Unit
Ac= Acres

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
City Boundary
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
General Mixed Use
North Gateway General Mixed Use
South Gateway General Mixed Use
Town Center Mixed Use
General Commercial
Industrial
Public/Institutional
Open Space
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 2-3
General Plan
Land Use
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 18
The following includes a description of the land use designations including the intensity of development permitted based on land use type.

2.5.1 Residential Land Use
The primary land use in the City is residential. The City’s Housing Element and General Plan include three residential land use categories including the following:
• Low Density Residential neighborhoods are characterized by single family detached homes with densities up to six (6) DU/ ac.
• Medium Density Residential neighborhoods may include cluster housing, duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, townhomes, condominiums, apartments, and mobile homes, in addition to low-density single-family homes. The designation allows for a density of 6.1-to 11 DU/ac; however, if a development provides affordable housing for low - moderate income households, the density may be increased by 35 percent to 15 DU/ac. • The High-Density Residential designation is intended for the development of multifamily residential neighborhoods that provide a variety of housing types, primarily along major transportation corridors. The designation allows for a density of 11.1-18.0 DU/ac. A development may increase its zoning density to twenty-four (24) DU/ac by providing affordable housing to low to moderate income households.

2.5.2 General Commercial Land Use
The existing General Commercial Land Use is currently located along Beach Boulevard between Ball Road and Garden Grove Boulevard. There are also areas of commercial land use along Katella Avenue and Cerritos Avenue. General Commercial Land Use encompasses a wide range of businesses which serve the local residential neighborhoods. The General Commercial Land Use designation may include but is not limited to retail shops, professional offices, restaurants, hotels, theaters, churches, and auto related facilities. FAR (Floor Area Ratio) ranges from 0.25 to 1.5.

2.5.3 Mixed - Use
The Mixed-Use Land Use areas allow for both vertical and horizontal mixed-use, consisting of residential, commercial, and office uses. In addition to General Mixed-Use designation, the City has defined three specific Mixed-Use Districts: North Gateway Mixed-Use District, South Gateway Mixed-Use District, and Town Center Mixed-Use District. Other areas of general mixed-use are also located throughout the City. Mixed-Use areas are defined as areas with 60 percent residential density and a 40 percent commercial density, assuming a FAR of 0.35.

General Mixed-Use - Areas are mainly located along Beach Boulevard between Katella Avenue and Catherine Avenue, and along Katella Avenue between Beach Boulevard and Dale Street.

Buildings are limited to a height of three (3) stories, and the zoning density shall be a maximum of forty-five (45) DU per acre. However, if a development provides affordable housing for low - moderate income households, the density may be increased by 50 percent to sixty-seven (67) DU per acre.

North Gateway Mixed-Use District – The district focuses on commercial and office uses, servicing northern Stanton and Anaheim areas and is located along Starr Street and Beach Boulevard. The buildings may be up to three (3) stories in height, and the zoning density shall NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 19
be no more than forty-five (45) DU/ac. Generally, commercial use is encouraged on the ground floor along Beach Boulevard with office and / or residential components on the upper floors.

A development may increase its zoning density to sixty-seven (67) DU/ac by providing affordable housing to low to moderate income households.

South Gateway Mixed-Use District – The district is the main entryway into the City from the Garden Grove Freeway (22Fwy) and communities to the south and is located along Beach Boulevard between Catherine Avenue and Garden Grove Boulevard. Commercial, office, and residential uses are allowed up to five (5) stories in height and a density of 60 DU/ac. Uses may be vertically or horizontally integrated, with an emphasis on freeway-oriented commercial and office uses. Residential uses are encouraged to support commercial uses and to serve as a transition to adjacent single-family and multifamily residential development. A development may increase its zoning density to ninety (90) DU/ac by 50 percent by providing affordable housing to low to moderate income households.

Town Center Mixed-Use District – The district focuses on community service uses in a transit supportive environment, with emphasis on a balance of commercial, office, and residential uses. This district is located near the civic center and potential transit routes and is intended to be pedestrian friendly with strong linkages between different uses and easy access to future transit. Commercial, office, and residential uses up to five (5) stories in height and an allowable density of 60 DU/ac. Retail uses are encouraged along the street frontage with office or residential on the rear of properties or upper floors of buildings. However, if a development provides affordable housing to low to moderate income households, the density may be increased by 50 percent to ninety (90) DU/ac.

2.5.4 Industrial Land Use
Industrial areas allow for manufacturing, processing, research and development, assembly, storage, warehousing, distribution, and other industrial services. The industrial developments shall be developed on either large or multiple parcels with common streetscape treatments and design.

2.5.5 Open Space Recreation
Dedicated to providing recreational needs and some open space value, the Open Space and Recreation Land Use is comprised of parks, bicycle paths, golf courses, the off-service Pacific Electric Railroad and Union Pacific Corridor, utility, and flood control easements. The City’s existing parks consist of: Stanton Central Park, Stanton Park, Hollenbeck Park, Stanton Tennis Courts, Norm Ross Sports Field, Veteran’s Memorial Park, Date and Katella Pocket Park, Dotson Park, Zuniga Park, and Premier Park.

2.5.6 Public / Institutional
The Public / Institutional category are Schools, City offices and yards, libraries, post offices, police and fire stations, hospitals, and medical centers. The City has two (2) public schools and one (1) private school.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 20

3.0 SUMMARY OF WASTEWATER ASSETS
The following section includes a description and summary of the City’s wastewater facilities. The City’s facilities include a network of gravity sewers, manholes, cleanouts, and siphons.

Information pertaining to the characteristics of the existing wastewater collection system was obtained primarily from the City’s Geographic Information System (GIS), previously prepared reports and studies, and input from City staff. Information obtained from the GIS included, but was not limited to, characteristics pertaining to pipelines, manholes, and cleanouts. Generally, the records for the sewer pipelines included:
• Facility ID
• Location
• Pipe Length
• Pipe Diameter
• Pipe Material
• Manhole Rim and Invert Elevations
The following includes a description of the City’s system assets and characteristics based on the information obtained from the GIS, reports, and City staff.

3.1 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
Information obtained from the City’s GIS indicates the majority of the City’s wastewater collection system was likely constructed during the 1950s and 1960s. The collection consists of gravity sewers predominantly of Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP). GIS information includes approximately 50.5 miles of pipe and approximately 1,100 manholes. Pipe diameters range between 6- and 24-inches. The number of pipe segments and the approximate length of pipe associated with the pipe diameter is summarized in Table 3-1. Information presented in Table 3-1 in is illustrated graphically in Figure 3-1.

Table 3-1 Wastewater Collection System by Pipe Diameter Pipe Diameter
Number of
Segments
Feet Miles
% of Total
Footage
6 7 1,075 0.2 0.4%
8 945 208,327 39.5 78.1%
10 99 23,605 4.5 8.9%
12 70 17,531 3.4 6.6%
15 39 9,730 1.8 3.6%
18 11 3,406 0.6 1.3%
21 8 1,687 0.3 0.6%
24 3 1,325 0.3 0.5%
Total 1,175 266,686 50.5 100.0%
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
!! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !! !! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!!
! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! !!

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
! Manhole
6"
8"
10"
12"
15"
18"
21"
24"
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 3-1
Wastewater Collection
System by Pipe Diameter
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 22

3.2 COLLECTION SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
Based on limited data available, it appears construction of the City’s collection system commenced in the 1950s when Vitrified Clay Pipe (VCP) was the most common pipe material used for construction.

The approximate length of pipe associated with the pipe diameter and material is summarized in Table 3-2. Information presented in Table 3-2 was obtained from the City’s GIS and is illustrated graphically in Figure 3-2.

Table 3-2 Wastewater Collection System by Pipe Material Pipe
Diameter
(in)
Material Total
VCP
(ft)
VCP
(mi)
PVC
(ft)
PVC
(mi)
Unk
(ft)
Unk
(mi)
Feet Miles
% of Total
Footage
6 391 0.07 684 0.13 - - 1,075 0.20 0.4%
8 203,426 38.53 826 0.16 4,075 0.77 208,327 39.5 78.1%
10 22,891 4.34 - - 714 0.14 23,605 4.5 8.9%
12 17,355 3.29 - - 176 0.03 17,531 3.3 6.6%
15 9,730 1.84 - - - - 9,730 1.8 3.6%
18 3,406 0.65 - - - - 3,406 0.7 1.3%
21 1,687 0.32 - - - - 1,687 0.3 0.6%
24 1,325 0.25 - - - - 1,325 0.3 0.5%
Total 260,211 49.29 1,510 0.29 4,965 0.94 266,686 50.5 100.0% As may be determined from Table 3-2, approximately 98 percent of the City’s system consists of VCP pipe. Historically, VCP pipe has an average life span ranging from 50-75 years. Based on the information presented in Table 3-2, approximately 98 percent of the VCP has reached the initial years of the pipe material life cycle. Therefore, as the wastewater collection system continues to age, is critical to continue to monitor the condition of the pipelines and identify methods to extend its service life where possible.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
!! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !! !! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!!
! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! !!

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
! Manhole
Unknown
Concrete
PVC
VCP
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 3-2
Wastewater Collection
System by Pipe Material
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 24
The City’s wastewater collection system includes twelve (12) flow diversions located at manholes where flows are diverted / split to multiple reaches. Table 3-3 includes a summary the Manhole IDs and locations where flow is split throughout the wastewater collection system. Information presented in Table 3-3 is illustrated graphically in Figure 3-3.

Table 3-3 Locations of Flow Diversions
MH ID MH Location
Flow Direction
at Split MH
Comments Plan No.

C004 Cerritos Avenue
and Rose Street
South and
Southeast
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
all flow goes south (C004-I004); no flow goes
southeast (C004-C058)
D-1485
D012
Beach
Boulevard and
First Street
South and
Southeast
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
most flow goes southeast (D012-D098); little flow
goes south (D012- D011)
CIP 02103
D025
Beach
Boulevard and
Starr Street
West and
Southwest
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
all flow goes southwest (D025-D022); no flow goes
west (D025-D023)
D-1485
D091
Cerritos
Avenue, 370'
E/O Beach
Boulevard
North and West
CCTV shows that the west pipe (D091-D003) is a
relief/overflow sewer. Model forces 100% of flow to
the north (D091-D032).

D-1485
E001 Cerritos Avenue
and Dale Street North and West
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
all flow goes north (E001-E003); no flow goes west
(E001-D010)
D-1485
H024
Katella
Avenue,660'
E/O Knott
Avenue
East and West Flows are split by invert elevations, slopes, and sizes.

Pipe H024-H023 to the west, H024-H025 to the east. D-1485 I009 Katella and
Rose Street South and West
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
all flow goes south (I009-I023); no flow goes west
(I009-I008)
D-1485
I021 Katella Avenue
and Oak Street North and West
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
all flow goes west (I021-I020); no flow goes north
(I021-I006)
D-1485
I096
Mitchell Drive,
east of Garrett
Street
Northwest and
Southeast
Flows are split by invert elevations, slopes, and sizes.

Pipe I096-I094 to the east, I096-I095 to the west. Unk
J004
Katella Avenue
and Court
Street
South and West
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
all flow goes south (J004-J015); no flow goes west
(J004-J003)
D-1485
J013
Katella Avenue
and Beach
Boulevard
North and West
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
all flow goes west (J013-I024); no flow goes north
(J013-J002)
D-1485
V004
Santa Rosalia
Street and
Georgian Street
South and
Southwest
Based on the invert elevations of the discharge pipes,
75% of flow goes south (V004-V003); 25% of flow
goes southwest (V004-V002)
CIP 02103
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
!! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !! !! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!!
! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! !!

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
D091 E001
J013
V004
D025
H024
I096
J004
I021
I009
D012
C004
Legend
ID Flow Diversion
!
Manhole
Sewer Pipes
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 3-3
Locations of
Flow Diversions
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 26

3.3 WASTEWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM SIPHONS
There are fourteen (14) siphons in the City’s wastewater collection system and are required where sewer pipelines cross existing storm drains. The City’s sewer system crosses beneath the following three (3) OCFCD storm drains.
• Knott Cerritos Storm Drain (OCFCD C02-P03)
• Stanton Storm Channel (OCFCD C02-S01)
• Anaheim Barber City Channel (OCFCD C03)
The existing siphon locations are listed in Table 3-4 and are graphically illustrated in Figure 3-4.

Table 3-4 Wastewater Collection System Siphons
No. Pipe
U/S
MH ID
D/S
MH ID
Location
Size
(in)
Length
(ft)
Material
Existing
PDWF
(mgd)
Comments
11 B026A-B026 B026A B026 Lowden Street South
of Cerritos Avenue 8 60 VCP 0.003
60" Cerritos Ave
storm drain crossing
22 B045-B019 B045 B019
Knott Avenue &
Cerritos Avenue - mid
intersection
8 62 VCP 0.118
81" OCFCD (C02-
P03) storm drain
crossing
31 H022-H021 H022 H021 Knott Avenue south
of Cerritos Avenue 10 57 VCP 0.131 C02-P03 storm drain crossing 41 H083-B021 H083 B021 Bell Street, south of
Cerritos Avenue 8 55 VCP 0.059 60" Stanton storm drain crossing 52 H093-B023 H093 B023 Lexington Street
South of Cerritos
8 359 VCP 0.014
60" Stanton storm
drain crossing
62 H097-B003 H097 B003 Courson Drive, south
of Cerritos Avenue
8 371 VCP 0.011
60" Stanton storm
drain crossing
72 H102-B001 H102 B001 Ramblewood Drive,
south of Cerritos
8 198 VCP 0.002 60" Stanton storm
82 H107-B005 H107 B005 Alley west of Courson
St, south of Cerritos 8 285 VCP 0.002
60" Stanton storm
drain crossing
91 I041-I040 I041 I040 Rose Street at Pacific
Electric
12 402 VCP 0.217 -
101 I049-I048 I049 I048 Rose Street at Pacific
Electric
12 363 VCP 0.002 -
111 I104-I105 I104 I106 Rose Street at Pacific
Electric
18 419 VCP 1.331 -
122 J035-J034 J035 J034 Monroe Avenue, east
of Court Street
8 60 VCP 0.013 5' x 6.5' OCFCD
(C02-S01)
trapezoidal
131 K039-J038 K039 J038 Dale Street & Monroe
Avenue
2-6” 91 VCP 0.007 42” MWD pipeline
142 W010-W008 W010 W008 Beach Blvd, north of
Catherine Avenue
8 164 VCP 0.058 Dbl 12’x10’ OCFCD
(C03) RCB Channel
Total 2,941
1Length of siphon from record drawings
2Length of siphon from GIS
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
!! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !! !! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!!
! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! !!

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
B026A
H083
B045
K039
H022
W010
H102
H097
H093
I049 I104
J035
H107
I041
Legend
Siphon
!
Manhole
Sewer Pipe
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 3-4
Wastewater Collection
System Siphons
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 28

3.4 INTERAGENCY FLOW LOCATIONS
Wastewater collection systems operate primarily on a gravity flow basis. However, agency boundaries do not always align with the natural drainage contours. Consequently, some portions of a service area may drain in a direction away from the gravity collection system which requires an inter-agency agreement. Interagency agreements are developed to allow wastewater flows to be conveyed into and/or through the collection system of an adjacent district or agency.

The City of Anaheim and the Garden Grove Sanitation District (GGSD) contribute substantial wastewater flows to the City’s sewer system at twenty-three (23) locations. Table 3-5 includes a summary of the inflow locations and are graphically illustrated in Figure 3-5.

Table 3-5 Interagency Inflow Locations
Manhole
ID
Location
Contributing
Agency
D/S Pipe
Size
Tributary Area
(Ac)
C800 Western Avenue, north of Ravenswood Drive Anaheim 12" 272.2 C806 Western Avenue & Sunview Drive Anaheim 10" 1.7
C809 Garrett Street, between Lanerose Drive & Cordy Avenue Anaheim 8" 4.1 C812 South Mastersin Road, between Lanerose Drive & Cody Avenue. Anaheim 8" 6.2 C813 Courtright Street, south of West Maywood Avenue Anaheim 8" 19.4 D022A Beach Blvd., north of Starr Street Anaheim 12" 309.5 D075 Fern Avenue, south of Ravenswood Drive Anaheim 8" 4.4 E052 Sherrill Street & Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 8" 17.2
E801 Dale Street, south of Ravenswood Drive Anaheim 8" 3.3 E808 Sherrill Street & Chanticleer Road Anaheim 8" 7.2
E809 Sherrill Street & Palais Street Anaheim 8" 14.9
K001 Katella Avenue & Dale Street GGSD 10" 34.9
S004 Chapman Avenue & Arthur Drive GGSD 15" 354.2
S815 Crager Lane, west of Jane Way GGSD 8" 6.8
S820 South of La monte Road & west of Hearing Drive GGSD 8" 2.5 V011 Vanguard Circle and Santa Rosalia Street GGSD 8" 4 V806 Laurelton Avenue, between Santa Rosalia Street & Fieldgate Street GGSD 8" 13.9 V036 Bently Avenue & Fieldgate Street GGSD 8" 8.9
V804 Belgrave Avenue, between Santa Rosalia Street & Fieldgate Street GGSD 8" 3 Z016 Fern Street & Garden Grove Blvd GGSD 8" 12.7
Z018 Fern Street & Acacia Avenue GGSD 12" 17.8
Z020 Fern Street & Stanford Avenue GGSD 12" 27.6
W005 Lampson Ave GGSD 8" 54
Total 1,200.40
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
!! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !! !! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!!
! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! !!
D075
S820
V806
C813
K001
Z018
Z016
S004
S815
V804
V036
Z020
C806
E801
V011
E808
E809
E052
D022A
W005
C809
C812

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITAAVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
Interagency Inflow Locations
! Manhole
Sewer Pipes
City Boundary
Hoover/Western Subtrunk 1 Basin
Hoover/Western Subtrunk 2 Basin
Katella Interceptor Basin
Knott Interceptor Basin
Lampson Interceptor Basin
Magnolia Subtrunk Basin
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet
1 " = 1,500 '

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 3-5
Interagency Inflow
Locations
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 30

3.5 THUNDERBIRD LANE RELIEF SEWER
The 2013 master plan update recommended a new 8-inch sewer on Thunderbird Lane as part of CIP project CI-1. The intent of the CIP project was to address an existing capacity issue for the existing 10-inch sewer between Manhole H065 in Thunderbird Lane and Manhole H052 in Bock Avenue. The new 8-inch sewer was originally intended to re-route all flow by gravity to the existing 15-inch sewer on Western Avenue, to replace the existing 8-inch sewer on Thunderbird Lane, and to abandon the existing 10-inch sewer running to Bock Avenue. However, the project was ultimately re-designed and constructed so that the new 8-inch line functions as a relief sewer in the event the 10-inch sewer between Manhole H065 and Manhole H052 reaches capacity and backs up. The existing 10-inch sewer was not abandoned and remains the primary sewer, and if it backs up, sewage will overflow into the 8-inch relief sewer at Manhole H065A.

Due to design elevation issues, the 8-inch relief sewer on Thunderbird Lane is unable to flow to the existing 15-inch sewer on Western Avenue by normal gravity flow. Instead, the relief sewer conveys flow to a large 72-inch diameter sump manhole (Manhole H065E) at the east end of Thunderbird Lane near the intersection with Western Avenue. Once the capacity of the sump is reached, wastewater overflows by gravity to Manhole I016B on Western Avenue but also backs up the 8-inch relief sewer on Thunderbird Lane. To avoid backing up the 8-inch relief sewer, the sump in Manhole H065E must be pumped out before reaching capacity.

The relief sewer is currently monitored by a smart manhole cover at Manhole H065A which detects the wastewater level in the manhole. This location is sufficient for detecting overflows (from the 10- inch sewer) but is not able to detect if the sump manhole (H065E) has reached capacity and is backing up the relief sewer. In November 2023, NV5 found that the sump manhole had reached capacity and was backing up the relief sewer, although most of the water appeared to be stormwater that entered the relief sewer as inflow or infiltration.

To avoid potential issues in the future, NV5 recommends that the City install a new smart manhole cover at the large sump manhole (H065E) to monitor the sump level and recommends pumping out the water before the sump reaches capacity.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 31

4.0 WASTEWATER GENERATION ANALYSIS
As the City continues to experience gradual increases in the number of wastewater customers due to growth, wastewater flows have lessened due to ongoing region-wide water conservation efforts. This chapter documents existing wastewater flows within the sewer service area and unit flows are updated for residential, commercial, and industrial areas. Peaking factors for contributing basins are developed and evaluated for dry and wet weather flows. This chapter provides description of the wastewater generation methodology including:
• Flow monitoring data
• Methodology for developing unit generation rates
• Recommended unit generation rates, and
• Estimated future wastewater flows

4.1 FLOW MONITORING
For purpose of this Master Plan Update and to characterize wastewater flows throughout the system, eight (8) temporary flow meters were strategically placed throughout the City’s sanitary sewer system.

The locations were selected to measure inflow from other agencies at specific locations, measure flows for specific land use designations, to update and/or confirm flow factors, and to calibrate the hydraulic model. The flows were monitored between January 28, 2023, and February 27, 2023, for a period of 32 days. Depth, velocity, and flows were measured at the designated locations for the study period.

Table 4-1 includes a description of the locations where flow monitoring was conducted. It should be noted that the meters for Site 6 and Site 7 were in the same manhole but in different upstream pipes.

Also, Site 8 was omitted as the meter was not able to be installed in a timely manner. Figure 4-1 illustrates the locations where temporary meters were installed.

Table 4-1 Flow Monitoring Locations
Site
#
MH ID Site ID U/S Pipe ID
Pipe
Diameter
(in)
Location
Monitor
Location
Area
(Acres)
Reason
1 I013 ST01 I014-I013 15 7456 Skyline Dr North 476 Calibration 2 I019 ST02 I020-I019 24 7545 Katella Ave East 1286 Calibration 3 R804 ST03 R011-R804 15 7550 Chapman Ave East 480 Calibration 4 N032 ST04 N033-N032 12 11212 Santa Maria St South 123 Flow Factor Calibration
5 I042 ST05 I052-I042 8 10671 Rose St West 13 Flow Factor Calibration
6 S004 ST06 GGSD 8 8119 Chapman Ave North 16 Agency Inflow Calibration
7 S004 ST07 S004-S003A 18 8119 Chapman Ave East 346 Agency Inflow Calibration
9 C800 ST09 C800-C017 12 1338 S Western Ave North 321 Agency Inflow Calibration
I013 !H
I019 !H
R804 !H
!H N032
!H I042
!H
S004
!H
C800

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITAAVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
City Boundary
ST01 (I013)
ST02 (I019)
ST03 (R804)
ST04 (N032)
ST05 (I042)
ST06 (S004)
ST07 (S004)
ST09 (C800)
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 4-1
Location of Temporary
Flow Meters
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 33
Figure 4-1 also illustrates the drainage basins from which wastewater flows enter the City’s collection system. The basins are designated based on the origin of the flows including Anaheim (AM) and the Garden Grove Sanitation District (GGSD) and the meter location where the flows were captured.

4.1.1 Metered Basins
Basins were delineated for the temporary installed flow meters. Wastewater flows generated within each basin were estimated from the average flows observed at the flow meter. The following includes a description of the metered basins.

Site No. 1 - Monitoring Site 1 was located on Western Avenue between Skyline Drive and Katella Avenue on a 15-inch diameter trunk line. The tributary area to Site 1 included approximately 476 acres, which included Low Density Residential (LDR), Medium Density Residential (MDR), High Density Residential (HDR), General Commercial (GC), Open Space (OS) and inflow from a tributary area within the City of Anaheim.

Monitoring Site 9 was located upstream of Site 1 and includes flows from Anaheim along the northern boundary of the City at Western Avenue. There are approximately 321 acres included in the tributary area associated with Monitoring Site 9.

Site No. 2 - Monitoring Site 2 was located on Katella Avenue between Mercantile Avenue and Western Avenue on a 24-inch diameter trunk line near an OCSD outlet. The tributary area to Site 2 included approximately 1,286 acres, which included LDR, MDR, HDR, GC, OS, I, PI, and portions of Anaheim and Garden Grove. Tributary areas associated with monitoring Sites 4 and 5 are located within the basin that was metered at Site 2.

Monitoring Site 2 was located east of Site 1 along Katella Avenue and downstream of Sites 4 and 5 and includes flows from Anaheim along the northern boundary of the City at Western Avenue and Garden Grove along Katella Avenue on the east. There are approximately 354 acres included in the tributary areas associated with Monitoring Site 2.

Site No. 3 - Monitoring Site 3 was located on Chapman Avenue between Hoover Street and Western Avenue on a 15-inch diameter trunk line near an OCSD outlet. The tributary area to Site 3 included approximately 480 acres, which comprised mostly LDR, MDR, GC, and a portion of Garden Grove. Captured at Site 3 are flows captured in basins for Sites 6 and 7. Both Sites 6 and 7 capture inflows from Garden Grove which are conveyed through the City of Stanton.

Site No. 4 - Monitoring Site 4 was located on Santa Maria Street on a 12-inch diameter trunk line. The tributary area to Site 4 included approximately 123 acres, which comprised mostly LDR land use area. The purpose of monitoring at Site 4 was to capture LDR flow rates.

Site No. 5 - Monitoring Site 5 was located at the intersection of Rose Street and Sandalwood Way on an 8-inch diameter pipeline. The tributary area to Site 5 included approximately 13 acres, which included mostly HDR land use area. The purpose of monitoring at Site 5 was to capture HDR flow rates.

Site No. 6 - Monitoring Site 6 was located at the intersection of Chapman and Arthur Drive on an 8-inch diameter pipeline. The tributary area to Site 6 included approximately 16 acres of LDR land use area in Garden Grove along the eastern boundary of the City of Stanton. The information captured served to confirm the use of similar factors for the City of Stanton.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 34
Site No. 7 - Monitoring Site 7 was located on Chapman Avenue between Arthur Drive and Beach Boulevard on an 18-inch diameter trunk line. The tributary area to Site 7 included approximately 346 acres, which comprised mostly LDR land use area in Garden Grove along the eastern boundary of the City downstream of monitoring Site 6. The site measured inflow from Garden Grove and the information was used to evaluate potential differences in flows that were included in the hydraulic model. It should be noted that meter data revealed that flows included in the model when compared to flow meter data appear to be conservative. The documented flows at Site 7 were 30 percent lower than what was previously included in the model.

Site No. 9 - Monitoring Site 9 was located on Western Avenue between Sunview Drive and Palais Road on a 12-inch diameter trunk line. The tributary area to Site 9 included approximately 321 acres of City of Anaheim and which appeared to include primarily LDR, HDR, schools, and some GC in the tributary area located on the north and eastern boundary of the City of Stanton.

Generally, flow monitoring at sites 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 was performed primarily for the purpose of calibrating the model at locations with large tributary areas. Flow monitoring at sites No. 2, 3 and 7 was conducted to confirm hydraulic deficiencies identified from the City’s existing sewer model analysis.

4.2 WASTEWATER GENERATION RATES
Establishing wastewater generation rates serves to characterize the existing unit rate by either population or land use, and for subsequent use in forecasting wastewater flows. Metered flows associated with land use data were used to develop planning level unit wastewater generation rates.

This system-wide approach was used and based on data obtained from the temporary flow meters located at the locations described. Table 4-2 includes a summary of the flow information captured at the eight (8) locations where meters were placed.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 35
Table 4-2 Flow Monitoring Locations and Flows

Site #
Measured Flow (mgd) Measured Velocity (fps) Measured Depth (in) Min Avg Max Min Avg Max Min Avg Max Max d/D
1 0.093 0.328 0.618 0.64 1.30 1.86 3.56 5.21 6.76 0.45
2 0.384 1.132 2.461 0.41 0.91 1.63 10.69 14.27 17.26 0.72 3 0.156 0.482 1.329 1.45 2.53 3.72 2.58 4.18 6.82 0.45
4 0.024 0.108 0.216 0.62 1.06 1.39 1.52 2.96 4.18 0.35
5 0.004 0.024 0.056 0.19 0.59 0.94 1.12 1.84 2.6 0.33
6 0.027 0.147 0.278 1.37 2.09 2.53 1.1 2.72 4.56 0.57
7 0.095 0.298 0.625 1.07 1.75 2.19 2.27 3.72 5.59 0.31
9 0.041 0.133 0.241 0.81 1.34 1.66 1.74 2.96 4.08 0.34

4.2.1 Recommended Wastewater Generation Rates
Estimating land-use based unit generation rates serves to establish the amount of wastewater generated per day over an acre of land based on designated land use types to estimate projected wastewater flows through a specific planning horizon. Land use-based generation rates are determined through a comparison of the existing area for a land use type against multiple sources of information, including rates applied by neighboring agencies and the average wastewater flows observed at the temporary flow meters. Based on the findings, the unit flow factors were updated to reflect current data.

Updated land use categories and the respective unit generation rates are summarized in Table 4-3. The system-wide unit flow factors were updated for the Medium Density Residential, General Commercial, Public/Institutional, and Open Space/Recreational land uses to provide a closer match between the calculated and measured flows and a comparison with other local agencies including the City of Anaheim and the Garden Grove Sanitation District.

To project wastewater flows for existing and planned residential developments with a known number of dwelling units, wastewater generation per dwelling unit rates (GPD/DU) included in Table 4-3 were applied. Flow monitoring data was evaluated to confirm the reasonableness of the flow factors.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 36
Table 4-3 Recommended Wastewater Unit Generation Rates
Land Use Designation
Max Density
(DU/Acre)
Recommended Unit Rate
GPD/DU GPD/Acre
Low Density Residential, LDR 6 250 1,440
Medium Density Residential, MDR 11 200 1,750
High Density Residential, HDR 18 200 3,000
General Mixed-Use, GMU, GLMX1 45 (672) 200 -
North Gateway Mixed-Use, North, NGMX1 45 (902) 200 -
South Gateway Mixed-Use, South, SGMX1 60 (902) 200 -
Town Center Mixed-Use, Town1 60 (902) 200 -
General Commercial, GC N/A N/A 2,000
Industrial, I N/A N/A 700
Public/Institutional, PI N/A N/A 2,000
Open Space/Recreational, OS N/A N/A 0
School3 N/A N/A N/A
Note:
1 For mixed-use zones, use parcel specific land use unit rate or dwelling unit generation rate. 2 50% bonus permitted for affordable housing.
3 For schools, use rate of 15 gpd/student.

4.3 IMPACT OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) continue to be developed throughout the City in all residential zones, primarily in Low Density Residential areas. The Housing Element projects a minimum of 14.7 new ADUs to be produced annually and there were approximately 25 ADUs permitted by the City each year in 2021 and in 2022.

Based on flow monitoring, the impact that existing ADUs have on the capacity of the wastewater collection system appears to be negligible and is covered by the recommended land use generation rates. This should be reevaluated as part of the next sewer master plan update, which should be completed approximately every 5 years. A hydraulic analysis could also be conducted for each future ADU addition on a case-by-case basis to determine if there is any impact on the capacity of the wastewater collection system downstream of the point of connection.

4.4 RHNA UNITS
The City’s 2021-2029 Housing Element lists a Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 1,231 new housing units for the 2021 to 2029 planning period. The hydraulic model prepared for this master plan addressed the additional flow that will be generated by these units by allocating a wastewater flow for housing projects identified in the Housing Element and other planned projects, including those listed in Section 6.5.3, totaling 1,398 units which exceeds the RHNA goal. Flow was allocated by using the wastewater generation per dwelling unit rates included in Table 4-3 and the number of dwelling units for each development.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 37

5.0 SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA
The level of service that is provided to a community is directly related to compliance with applicable regulations and implementation of improvements planned and designed in accordance with accepted criteria. The capacity of the collection system is analyzed with a hydraulic model and findings are evaluated against established and verified design criteria to identify capacity deficiencies.

Included in this chapter is a description of the design criteria used to evaluate the existing sewer system for existing and future flow conditions and design criteria for planning and design of new sewer infrastructure.

5.1 DESIGN CRITERIA BACKGROUND
The City provides a level of service that complies with state and federal sanitary sewer regulations to assure the collection system is efficiently and effectively managed to meet public health and safety standards. The City adheres to the criteria included in its Municipal Code, the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Contracts (Greenbook) or as directed and approved by the City Engineer which serve to assist the professional design community and the general public by consolidating information related to the City’s engineering standards. Title 13, Public Utilities, of the Municipal Code includes specific requirements related to the City’s sewer system.

5.2 GRAVITY SEWER DESIGN CRITERIA
The primary design criterion for gravity sewers is the depth of flow, which is calculated in the hydraulic model based on Manning’s Equation. The capacity of each gravity sewer is based on the relative depth of flow within the respective pipeline reach. Gravity sewers are not typically designed to flow full, as unoccupied space at the top of the pipe is required for conveyance of sewage gasses and to provide contingent capacity for wet weather inflow and infiltration.

A secondary design criterion used for gravity sewers is pipeline velocity which is also calculated in the hydraulic model. A minimum pipeline velocity of 2 feet per second (ft/s) during peak dry weather flow (PDWF) conditions is recommended to self-clean and prevent solids from settling. However, achieving this velocity may not be feasible if there is insufficient pipeline slope or insufficient flow. Pipelines that are unable to meet the velocity criterion should be frequently maintained, flushed, and cleaned to prevent solids buildup and potential odor issues.

Friction (roughness) factors for pipelines are a required input to the model. The factors vary with the material and the age of the pipe. Since it appears the City’s wastewater collection system consists primarily of VCP, a roughness factor as indicated by a Manning’s coefficient (“n”) of 0.013 is used to evaluate the existing gravity sewers and for projection of future sizing needs. Previous studies have shown that this value typically accounts for the roughness of most pipes, joints, and fouling that occurs after several years of operation. The applied design criteria are summarized in Table 5-1.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 38
Table 5-1 Design Criteria – Gravity Sewers
Criteria for All Pipes
Pipeline Roughness Coefficient n = 0.013
Maximum d/D Ratio (PWWF), All Pipe Diameters 0.82
Criteria for Existing Pipes
Maximum d/D Ratio (PDWF), All Pipe Diameters 0.62
Criteria for New or Upsized Pipes
Maximum d/D Ratio (PDWF), Diameter < 15-inches 0.50
Maximum d/D Ratio (PDWF), Diameter ≥ 18-inches 0.62
Minimum Pipeline Diameter 8-inches
Minimum Pipeline Velocity at PDWF1 2 feet per second
1 Minimum pipeline velocity criteria shall be adhered to when feasible Analysis of the City’s existing gravity sewer system was based upon the calculated peak dry weather flows. Any segment of existing sewer pipe with a depth to diameter ratio (d/D) of 0.62 or greater was considered hydraulically deficient. This allows for approximately 40 percent capacity above the peak dry weather flow for inflow and infiltration (I/I) based on the assumption that the maximum capacity of a circular pipe will occur when d/D = 0.82 rather than the theoretical maximum that occurs at d/D =

0.938.

The extra pipeline capacity allows for the possibility that actual wastewater flows may be slightly higher than anticipated, especially during the hours when instantaneous or intermittent peaks may occur.

Additionally, the area above the water surface allows for aeration of the sewer flows to reduce the possibility of septic conditions and generation of odors.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 39

6.0 HYDRAULIC MODEL UPDATE
To perform the detailed analysis of the sewer collection system, the City’s existing hydraulic sewer model, which simulates the operating properties of the wastewater collection system was updated. The original model was developed in InfoSewer by Innovyze, a GIS based modeling software. InfoSewer was used to update the model and perform steady state analysis of the wastewater flows throughout the system for this Master Plan Update. This chapter provides a description of the hydraulic model update and includes:
• An overview of the hydraulic model and methodology
• Model development, flow allocation, and calibration
• Peaking factors

6.1 BACKGROUND
A capacity analysis of the City wastewater collection system was completed to identify sewer reaches that may be deficient under existing design criteria and to identify any upsizing necessary to accommodate existing and projected dry and wet weather wastewater flows. The capacity analysis serves to identify phased facility improvements to reduce the potential for sanitary sewer overflows and allow for projected growth within the City’s service area while maintaining a minimum level of service to its residents relative to the capacity of its assets.

The sewer model includes the City’s wastewater infrastructure including manholes and sewer pipelines (excluding laterals and private sewers). Also included are the connections to OCSD’s five (5) facilities within the City’s boundary including: Knott Interceptor, Katella Interceptor, Hoover- Western Subtrunk, Magnolia Subtrunk, and the Lampson Interceptor.

6.2 METHODOLOGY
The principal tool utilized in the capacity analysis was a hydraulic model. The hydraulic model simulates flow conditions, including wastewater flow depth, flow rate, and velocity within the pipelines and manholes in the City’s wastewater collection system. The model uses the projected average dry weather flows and determines peak flows based upon the peaking factors listed in Section 6.7.

6.3 LIMITATIONS OF HYDRAULIC MODELING
The hydraulic sewer model was utilized as the primary planning tool for the sewer capacity analysis and provides a reasonable representation of actual flow conditions within a sanitary sewer system in response to existing and future sewage loading. The accuracy of the simulation, however, is directly related to the accuracy of the model input data, including physical parameters and sewage loading projections. In the future, the accuracy of the City’s model could be improved by surveying all sewer manholes and pipe inverts, conducting additional flow monitoring, and updating the model.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 40

6.4 MODEL UPDATE
The City’s hydraulic model combines information of the physical and operational characteristics of the wastewater collection system and performs calculations to solve a series of mathematical equations to simulate the flows in pipes. The model update process consisted of the following steps, as described below:
• The InfoSewer hydraulic model obtained from the City was reviewed against the City’s GIS data.

Where discrepancies were noted, the model was updated to reflect corrections and current field conditions.
• The updated hydraulic model was reviewed to verify the model data was input correctly and the flow direction, size, and layout of the modeled pipelines were logical. Quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) involved comparing the updated hydraulic model with other limited data sources such as record drawings and discussion with City personnel.

It should be noted that there was information included in the City’s GIS found to be incorrect. Where possible and information was available, corrections and updates were made based on record drawings, Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) inspections, input from City personnel, and field verifications performed by City staff. Only active sewers owned by the City are included in the hydraulic model. Sewer laterals and private sewers were not included nor analyzed.

6.4.1 Hydraulic Model Elements
An overview of the hydraulic model is presented in Figure 6-1. The major elements of the hydraulic model and the required input parameters are summarized below:
• Pipes: Sewer mains are represented as pipes in the hydraulic model. Input parameters for pipes include length, friction factor (Manning’s n values), pipe diameter, and pipe shape. • Junctions: Sewer manholes, as well as other locations where sewer pipe sizes change, sewer pipes intersect or where sewer pipes start or end, are represented as junctions. Input parameters for junctions are invert elevation and maximum depth.
• Outfalls: Outfalls represent areas where flow leaves the system. For sewer system modeling, outfalls typically represent the connection to the inlet at a wastewater treatment plant and/or the boundary point for the sewer system. Input parameters for outfalls include outfall type and invert elevation.
• Load Allocation: The load represents the wastewater flows discharged into the wastewater collection system and used to either maintain or size the infrastructure for existing and future conditions.
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!!
!! ! !
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
! !
!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !! !! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!!
! !
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! !!

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
! Manhole
Sewer Pipes
OCSD Facilities
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 6-1
Elements of the
Hydraulic Model
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 42

6.5 WASTEWATER LOAD ALLOCATION
A significant component of the hydraulic model is the quantity of average dry weather wastewater flows generated and the method used to distribute the flows throughout the sewer system. While there are various methods to assign wastewater flows in hydraulic models, adequate estimates of the wastewater loads are an important part in maintaining and sizing sewer system infrastructure both for existing and future conditions.

For this update, wastewater loads were primarily allocated based on existing and future land use and the recommended wastewater generation rates listed in Chapter 4.

The general process for assigning wastewater loads was as follows:
• The City’s service area is divided into loading polygons. The loading polygons were previously generated and where appropriate were updated for this update. Polygons provide a means to divide an area into regions that bisect known points (junctions). These polygons typically represent the bounded region closest to each of the junctions. Each loading polygon represented the geographic area that contributes flows to a specific manhole. • For each loading area, the existing land use areas and the recommended wastewater generation unit flow factors were used by the model to automatically allocate average flows to each manhole.

For the 10-year planning horizon, land use factors were applied as average loads to the specific scenario in the model.
• PDWFs and PWWFs are calculated in the model based on the peaking factors listed in Section

6.7. • Point loads were used to account for schools, outside agencies contributing to the City’s system, and future flows from vacant parcels and the City’s planned projects.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 43

6.5.1 Schools
The City’s existing land use map and general plan map were used to designate land uses for the model.

Schools were assigned a distinct land use designation. The flows included in Table 6-1 below, were included in the previous model and applied at the respective manholes. The flow factors remained unchanged.

Table 6-1 School Loads
Manhole ID School Location
No. of
Students
Unit Flow
Factor
(gpd/stu)
Existing
ADWF
(mgd)
Future
ADWF
(mgd)
D037 &
E003
Robert M. Pyles
Elementary 10411 South Dale Street 780 15 0.012 0.012
S004 &
S003A St Polycarp Elementary 8182 Chapman Ave 169 15 0.003 0.003 N095
Early Childhood
Education Center at
Carver Preschool
11150 Santa Rosalia Street 90 15 0.001 0.001
Total 1,039 0.016 0.016

6.5.2 Outside Agencies
Neighboring agencies including the City of Anaheim and the Garden Grove Sanitation District convey flow through the City’s wastewater collection system. There are eleven (11) locations at which City of Anaheim discharges wastewater flows into the City’s wastewater collection system and an additional twenty-four (24) locations at which Garden Grove discharges flow into the City. The average dry weather flows at these locations are estimated based up the tributary land uses and the unit flow factors applied by the adjoining agencies. The following includes a summary of the methodology applied to determine flow contributions from each adjoining agency.

6.5.2.1 City of Anaheim
The City of Anaheim was contacted and current flow information, specifically at the locations at which the City of Anaheim flows discharge in the City’s collection system, was requested. The City does not conduct regular flow monitoring of their system flow but provided access to Anaheim’s West Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (WAMPSS), dated June 2019.

As noted in Chapter 4, flow monitoring was performed at Site 8 which captured flows from Anaheim entering the City at manhole C800. The results of the temporary flow monitoring indicate that flows included in Anaheim’s WAMPSS are overly conservative. Additionally, discrepancies in the 2013 Master Plan document and the hydraulic analysis were identified, specifically the documented existing ADWF and what was included in the model. Model data reflected a reduction of approximately ten percent (10%) than what was published. As neither the basis nor reasoning was provided or could be determined, and as the WAMPSS does not include specific flow information at the inflow locations, for modeling purposes, the existing average dry weather flow at the metered location was adjusted to reflect the metered flows. The flows at the remaining inflow locations remained unchanged. Table 6-2 includes a summary of the average dry weather flows that were input into the City’s model as point NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 44
source flows at the respective connection locations. These flows were used for both existing and future conditions considering that Anaheim is mostly built-out and because most existing flow projections seem to be conservative.

6.5.2.2 Garden Grove Sanitation District
The Garden Grove Sanitation District (GGSD) was contacted and current flow information, specifically at the locations at which GGSD flows discharge in the City’s collection system, was requested. GGSD does not conduct regular flow monitoring of their system flow but provided access to the Garden Grove System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan, dated April 2012. The document does not include specific flow data for the inflow locations.

As previously noted, flows measured at Site 7 (Manhole S004) included wastewater flows from GGSD.

Flow data captured revealed that actual flows are significantly lower than what was included in the 2013 Master Plan. The documented metered flows were approximately 30% lower than what was included in the previous hydraulic model. For purposes of this Master Plan Update, the wastewater flow at this specific inflow location was updated to reflect the actual metered flow. However, GGSD has not updated its master plan and additional information was not available at the time this update was performed. Therefore, for modeling purposes, the existing average dry weather flow at the metered location was adjusted to reflect the metered flows. The flows at the remaining inflow locations remained unchanged. Table 6-2 includes a summary of the average dry weather flows that were input into the City’s model as point source flows at the respective connection locations. These flows were used for both existing and future conditions considering that Garden Grove is mostly built-out and because most existing flow projections seem to be conservative.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 45
Table 6-2 Summary of Average Dry Weather Flows from Anaheim and Garden Grove Manhole
ID
Location
Contributing
Agency
D/S Pipe
Size
Tributary Area
(Ac)
ADWF
(mgd)
C800 Western Avenue, north of
Ravenswood Drive Anaheim 12" 272.2 0.146
C806 Western Avenue and Sunview
Drive Anaheim 10" 1.7 0.002
C809 Garrett Street, between Lanerose
Drive and Cordy Avenue Anaheim 8" 4.1 0.005
C812 South Mastersin Road, between
Lanerose Drive and Cody Avenue. Anaheim 8" 6.2 0.011
C813 Courtright Street, south of West
Maywood Avenue Anaheim 8" 19.4 0.022
D022A Beach Blvd., north of Starr Street Anaheim 12" 309.5 0.359 D075 Fern Avenue, south of
Ravenswood Drive Anaheim 8" 4.4 0.005
E052 Sherrill Street and Cerritos Avenue Anaheim 8" 17.2 0.020 E801 Dale Street, south of Ravenswood
Drive Anaheim 8" 3.3 0.0038
E808 Sherrill Street and Chanticleer
Road Anaheim 8" 7.2 0.008
E809 Sherrill Street and Palais Street Anaheim 8" 14.9 0.017 K001 Katella Avenue and Dale Street GGSD 10" 34.9 0.071 S004 Chapman Avenue and Arthur Drive GGSD 15" 354.2 0.495 S815 Crager Lane, west of Jane Way GGSD 8" 6.8 0.004
S820 South of La monte Road and west
of Hearing Drive GGSD 8" 2.5 0.004
V011 Vanguard Circle and Santa Rosalia
Street GGSD 8" 4 0.005
V806 Laurelton Avenue, between Santa
Rosalia Street and Fieldgate Street GGSD 8" 13.9 0.020
V036 Bently Avenue and Fieldgate Street GGSD 8" 8.9 0.008 V804 Belgrave Avenue, between Santa
Rosalia Street and Fieldgate Street GGSD 8" 3 0.003
Z016 Fern Street and Garden Grove Blvd GGSD 8" 12.7 0.031 Z018 Fern Street and Acacia Avenue GGSD 12" 17.8 0.024
Z020 Fern Street and Stanford Avenue GGSD 12" 27.6 0.038 W005 Lampson Ave GGSD 8" 54 0.143
Total 1,200 1,471
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 46

6.5.3 Planned Projects
The City has identified several development projects that were in the planning stage or in construction at the time this Master Plan Update was prepared. The wastewater flows were determined based on dwelling unit generation rates and the number of units for each project. Each project was modeled as a point load in the Future (10-year planning horizon) condition. Table 6-3 includes a summary of the City’s planned project included in the hydraulic analysis. A detailed summary is included in Appendix 1.

Table 6-3 Planned Projects
Project Name Developer Project Address Status
No. of
Units
Lighthouse KB Home 10871 Western Ave. Completed 40
Assemblage KB Home 7455 Katella Ave. Completed 36
VRV Bonanni 12736 Beach Blvd. Completed 300
Cloud House Bonanni 12331-12435 Beach
Blvd. In Progress 321
Bigsby Bonanni 12200 Beach Blvd. In Progress 79
ShareMyCoach Joe Hill 10775 Beach Blvd. In Progress 1
Tina-Pacific Brandywine Tina Way & Pacific Way Housing Element 161 Super King / Magnolia Plaza N/A 10560 Magnolia Ave. Completed 1 Attached Condos Huy Tran 11752 Beach Blvd Completed 17
Tahiti Jamboree 11850-11870 Beach
Blvd. Completed 60
Riviera Jamboree 11892 Beach Blvd Housing Element 19
Townhome Units Loc Tran 7320 Katella Ave. In Progress 6 Stanton Inn Jamboree Housing 7161 Katella Ave. Completed 72 Detached Single Family Units Sean Singh 7082 Kermore Street Plan Check 4 Townhome Units An Ha 7162 Kermore Street Completed 4
Multi Family Unit Christopher Caohuynh 7131 Kermore Street Plan Check 5 ORCO Block Site Stanton Land LLC 8042 Katella Avenue In Progress 159 Detached Condos James Le 8222 Starr Street Plan Check 5 SB-9 Urban Lot Split
(2 duplexes)
Henry Cao & Phat Ho 10861 Oak Street Planning Commission 4 Medical Building Scott Belair 10692 Beach Blvd. Planning Commission 4 Single Family Detached
Condos Emily Fahrenhoiz 7091 Kermore Lane In Progress 1 NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 47

6.6 MODEL CALIBRATION
Hydraulic model calibration is a critical step in the hydraulic modeling effort. Calibrating the model results to match measured values assures the most accurate results possible. The calibration process consists of calibrating to both dry and wet weather conditions. The model was calibrated based on the flow monitoring conducted at the eight (8) temporary flow meters.

The flow monitoring data captured at each of the monitoring locations included data related to specific land use as well as inflows at connections with adjoining agencies. The model was calibrated by refining estimated model parameters under dry and wet weather conditions to simulate model flow conditions that reasonably approximate the measured flow conditions.

6.6.1 Dry Weather Flow Calibration
Dry weather flow calibration serves to accurately model the base wastewater flows in the service area.

To load the areas tributary to the flow meters, dry weather flows were calibrated to the flow monitoring data captured between January 28, 2023 and February 27, 2023.

The calibration process included verification that the calculated average flow from the areas tributary to the flow meters matched the measured average flows at each flow meter. The calculated average flow was subsequently adjusted to reflect the flow factor assigned to the various land use types within the tributary area.

A calibrated dry weather diurnal curve was developed based on the flow monitoring data. Figure 6-2 illustrates the calibration process and reflects the documented flows at each of the metered sites. The dashed red line (best fit) represents the calibrated average hourly flow.

Figure 6-2 Average Dry Weather Diurnal Curves

0.0 0.2

0.4 0.6

0.8 1.0

1.2 1.4

1.6 1.8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

PEAKING FACTOR
HOUR
ST01 ST02 ST03 ST04-LDR ST05-HDR
ST06-LDR/HDR ST07 ST09 CALIBRATED

DIURNAL
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 48
Figure 6-3 also illustrates the calibrated diurnal curve with hourly peaking factors.

Figure 6-3 Calibrated Diurnal Curve

6.6.2 Wet Weather Flow Loading and Calibration
Collection systems may be compromised when they must transport higher flows than what they were designed to convey, which can result in a discharge of untreated wastewater into the environment.

Wet Weather Flow Loading
Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) generally consists of wet weather infiltration and stormwater inflow that enters the wastewater collection system. Infiltration may enter the collection system through defects in the system pipelines which may include, cracks, broken pipe, offset joints, break-in connections, and manholes due to temporary high groundwater levels as a result of rainfall percolation or consistent high water levels. Typically, infiltration from rainfall events can be estimated using flow metering technology and rainfall records. However, infiltration that occurs year-round is generally detected by performing inspections of the pipelines and manholes and occur in areas with high groundwater elevations.

Wet Weather Calibration
Wet weather flow calibration assures accurate modelling of anticipated I&I into the sewer system. I&I can be interpreted as the difference between dry weather flow and wet weather flow. Wet weather flows were calibrated to a rain event that occurred on February 25, 2023. Based on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates and NOAA precipitation data, this rain event is estimated to have been between a 10-Year and 25-Year frequency event, a historically large rain event.

0.0 0.1

0.2 0.3

0.4 0.5

0.6 0.7

0.8 0.9

1.0 1.1

1.2 1.3

1.4 1.5

1.6 1.7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

PEAKING FACTOR
HOUR
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 49

6.7 PEAKING FACTORS
The wastewater unit flow factors were used to generate average dry weather flows entering the collection system. To determine the adequacy of the collection system to convey peak flows, PDWFs were determined by using the flow data collected at each site to determine the average daily weather flows and maximum daily flows over a 24-hour period. The measured peaking factors at each site were averaged to determine the estimated peaking factor which was applied to the average dry weather flows loaded into the model and converting the total average flow to peak dry weather flows.

Table 6-4 includes a summary of the average and maximum dry and wet weather flow data captured at the eight metered locations. Additionally, the summary includes the calculated dry weather and wet weather peaking factors.

Table 6-4 Dry and Wet Weather Peaking Factors

Site #

Dry Weather Flow
(mgd)
Wet Weather Flow
(mgd)
Average
Dry Weather
Flow
Peak Factor1
Average
Wet Weather
Flow
Peak Factor2 Avg Max Avg Max
1 0.336 0.508 0.379 0.631 1.51 1.24
2 1.108 1.564 1.472 2.541 1.41 1.62
3 0.470 0.701 0.724 1.365 1.49 1.95
4 0.107 0.160 0.137 0.230 1.49 1.44
5 0.023 0.037 0.034 0.063 1.60 1.70
6 0.146 0.233 0.188 0.278 1.59 1.19
7 0.296 0.428 0.394 0.704 1.45 1.64
9 0.134 0.199 0.157 0.241 1.49 1.21
1 Average dry weather flow peak factor is calculated as maximum dry weather flow divided by average dry weather flow.
2 Average wet weather flow peak factor is calculated as maximum wet weather flow divided by maximum dry weather flow.

The average of all the dry weather flow peaking factors listed in Table 6-4 is approximately 1.5.

However, a peaking factor of 1.6 was selected and applied to the hydraulic model considering that the highest calculated peak factor was 1.6.

The average of all the wet weather flow peaking factors listed in Table 6-4 is approximately 1.5.

However, a peaking factor 1.4 was selected and applied to the hydraulic model, considering that the rain event that occurred during flow monitoring was a historically large rain event. The Garden Grove Sanitation District design criteria also lists a wet weather flow peaking factor of 1.4.

In summary, the following peaking relationship was selected and applied to the analysis for this Master Plan Update:
• Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) = 1.6 x Average Dry Weather Flow (ADWF) • Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) = 1.4 x Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 50

7.0 HYDRAULIC / CAPACITY ANALYSIS

7.1 EVALUATION CRITERIA
Per the design criteria listed in Chapter 5, existing sewer pipelines are considered hydraulically deficient if they have a d/D ratio greater than or equal to 0.62 during peak dry weather flow (PDWF) conditions or they have a d/D ratio greater than or equal to 0.82 during peak wet weather flow (PWWF) conditions.

However, hydraulically deficient sewer pipelines shall not be identified as a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) project for immediate replacement/upsizing. Instead, hydraulically deficient sewer pipelines are to be identified as improvement projects if either or both of the following conditions exist:
• There are corresponding operations and maintenance issues associated with the pipeline • The pipeline is identified for replacement due to condition related deficiencies If either of these situations occurs, the pipeline is to be replaced and upsized per the design criteria listed in Chapter 5 for new or upsized pipes, which is more stringent than the design criteria for existing pipes.

7.2 CAPACITY ANALYSIS
Wastewater flow projections were developed for 2023 (existing) conditions and for the 10-year planning horizon (2033, future) conditions. Future wastewater flow projections were determined by applying land use unit generation rates to the land use acreages per land use designation or by applying dwelling unit (DU) generation rates where the number of DUs is known for planned developments. These projections form the basis for sewer input flows to the hydraulic model, and analyses of future capacity needs in the wastewater collection system. Refer to Section 4 regarding wastewater generation rates.

A capacity analysis of the existing collection system was performed under existing and future dry and wet weather flow conditions to identify potential improvement projects. The hydraulic analysis was performed for each of the following scenarios:
• 2023 Peak Dry Weather Flow (Existing)
• 2023 Peak Wet Weather Flow (Existing)
• 2033 Peak Dry Weather Flow (10-year, Future)
• 2033 Peak Wet Weather Flow (10-year, Future)
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 51
A 10-year planning horizon was analyzed to project future wastewater flows for incorporation into the hydraulic model. Future flows to be conveyed in the wastewater collection system included flows expected to be generated from the anticipated development of parcels that include planned redevelopment of parcels as identified by the City and the eventual development of remaining vacant parcels.

A summary of anticipated developments with estimated housing units is summarized in Appendix 1, which includes information pertinent to the planned developments including the address, status at the time the Master Plan Update was prepared, APNs associated with the development, and MH ID at which the flows were loaded in the hydraulic model. An overview of the planned developments is illustrated in Figure 7-1.

Additionally, there were forty-nine (49) additional parcels identified as vacant. All forty-nine (49) vacant parcels were loaded into the model based on the designated land use type, acreage, and by applying the recommended wastewater generation rate. A summary of vacant parcels with estimated wastewater flow is included in Appendix 2. Figure 7-2 illustrates the remaining vacant parcels for which flow projections were estimated and included to analyze future flow conditions.

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITAAVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
Parcel
Development Type
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
General Commercial
Mixed Use
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet
1 " = 1,500 '

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: June 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 7-1
Planned
Developments

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITAAVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
City Boundary
Future Land Use for Vacant Parcels
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Parking Lot
Open Space
Planned Development
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 7-2
Vacant Parcels
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 54

7.3 CAPACITY ANALYSIS FINDINGS
The following includes a summary of the capacity analysis findings, specifically for each scenario and the pipelines identified to be deficient in capacity based on the criteria included in Chapter 5. As previously noted, existing pipelines with a d/D ratio of 0.62 or greater at PDWF or a d/D ratio of 0.82 or greater at PWWF are identified as potential improvement reaches. Results of the hydraulic analysis for each system pipeline are included in Appendix 3. Tables 7-1 and 7-2 include a summary of the pipelines not meeting the evaluation criteria for each scenario and the location of these sewer pipelines is illustrated on Figure 7-3.

Table 7-1 Pipelines Not Meeting Evaluation Criteria for Dry Weather Conditions Pipe ID
Diameter
(in)
Length
(ft)
Slope
Existing PDWF Future PDWF
Total Flow
(mgd)
Velocity
(ft/s)
d/D
Total Flow
(mgd)
Velocit
y (ft/s)
d/D
I012-I001 15 9 -0.006 0.81 1.02 1.00 0.85 1.07 1.00
W003-W002 8 364 0.002 0.26 1.69 0.64 0.26 1.69 0.64
W004-W003 8 360 0.002 0.25 1.68 0.62 0.25 1.68 0.62
W005-W004 8 338 0.002 0.25 1.68 0.62 0.25 1.68 0.62
Table 7-2 Pipelines Not Meeting Evaluation Criteria for Wet Weather Conditions Pipe ID
Diameter
(in)
Length
(ft)
Slope
Existing PWWF Future PWWF
Total
Flow
(mgd)
Velocity
(ft/s)
d/D
Total
Flow
(mgd)
Velocity
(ft/s)
d/D
I012-I001 15 9 -0.006 1.13 1.43 1.00 1.19 1.51 1.00
W003-W002 8 364 0.002 0.36 1.59 1.00 0.36 1.59 1.00
W004-W003 8 360 0.002 0.35 1.77 0.82 0.35 1.77 0.82
W005-W004 8 338 0.002 0.35 1.77 0.82 0.35 1.77 0.82

7.3.1 Peak Dry Weather Flow (PDWF) Conditions
Existing (2023) PDWF Conditions
Four pipe segments (I012-I001, W003-W002, W004-W003, and W005-W004) were identified as hydraulically deficient under existing peak dry weather flow conditions. The deficiency at the intersection of Katella Avenue and Western Avenue, in pipe segment I012-I001 (15-inch pipe diameter) is due to a backwater effect caused by flow entering from the east along Katella Avenue via the 24-inch diameter pipeline that discharges at MH I018 and the reverse pipe slope in segment I012-I001, which results in a d/D of 1.0, exceeding the d/D criteria of 0.62.

Deficiencies were also identified for pipe segments W003-W002, W004-W003, and W005-W004 (8- inch pipe diameter) along Lampson Avenue east of Beach Boulevard. The hydraulic analysis showed d/D ratios of 0.64 and 0.62 and the deficiencies are due to the pipeline being undersized. This pipeline is owned by the city but is shared with the Garden Grove Sanitation District (GGSD), under the 2008 NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 55
Joint Use (Cooperative) Sanitary Sewer Agreement included in Appendix 5. These pipeline segments were also identified as deficient by the GGSD and was listed as CIP project No. 52 in their 2012 System Evaluation and Capacity Assurance Plan, which proposed upsizing the existing 8-inch pipeline to a 12- inch pipeline. However, per GGSD staff that project was not implemented.

Future (2023) PDWF Conditions
Similar to existing peak dry weather conditions, four pipe segments (I012-I001, W003-W002, W004- W003, and W005-W004) were identified as hydraulically deficient under future peak dry weather flow conditions with d/D ratios exceeding the d/D criteria of 0.62.

7.3.2 Peak Wet Weather Flow (PWWF) Conditions
Similar to peak dry weather flow conditions, four pipe segments (I012-I001, W003-W002, W004-W003, and W005-W004) were identified as hydraulically deficient under existing (2023) and future (2033) peak wet weather flow conditions with d/D ratios exceeding the d/D criteria of 0.82.

7.4 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PIPELINES WITH CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES The capacity analysis, described above, identified four pipe segments that are hydraulically deficient.

Recommendations for each deficient pipe segment are provided below.

Pipes W003-W002, W004-W003, and W005-W004:

NV5 recommends that the City conduct flow monitoring upstream and downstream of these 8-inch pipe segments, at Manholes W005 and W002, to verify this capacity deficiency for existing conditions and that the City survey all manholes to verify pipeline elevations. Future flow projections for these shared sewer segments should also be verified with the Garden Grove Sanitation District with consideration for future developments within the City of Garden Grove. Following these tasks the hydraulic model should be updated and the pipeline should be re-evaluated to determine if the pipeline is hydraulically deficient and needs to be replaced with a larger pipeline. If required, replacement costs would be shared between the city and the Garden Grove Sanitation District per the joint-use agreement.

NV5 also recommends that the City closely monitor these pipe segments to determine if there are any corresponding operations and maintenance issues with the identified capacity deficiencies.

W003-W002

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITAAVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
I012-I001
W005-W004
W004-W003
Legend
Hydraulic Deficiency
Existing Sewer Pipe
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet
1 " = 1,500 '

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 7-3
Hydraulic Deficiencies for
Peak Dry Weather Conditions
W003-W002

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITAAVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
I012-I001
W005-W004
W004-W003
Legend
Hydraulic Deficiency
Existing Sewer Pipe
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet
1 " = 1,500 '

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 7-4
Hydraulic Deficiencies for
Peak Wet Weather Conditions
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 58

8.0 PIPELINE CONDITION ASSESSMENT
This chapter provides a description of the pipeline condition assessment performed as part of the Master Plan Update and includes:
• Inspection and assessment criteria and procedures
• Summary of the pipeline condition assessment results

8.1 BACKGROUND
A wastewater system condition assessment provides municipalities with valuable information used to determine the funding required to repair and rehabilitate an aging collection system and to prioritize how the funds should be allocated. An assessment is used to identify the existing system conditions and defects which may contribute to potential overflows. Such conditions include root intrusion at misaligned joints or cracks, deposits or debris, I/I entering into the system through cracks in pipes or manholes or via illegal storm drain connections, which affect pipe capacity. The condition assessment of the existing collection system included CCTV inspection of approximately 47 miles of pipeline.

8.2 INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT
Closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras offer valuable insight into the structural and maintenance condition of underground infrastructure. Video inspection of sewer pipelines is used to evaluate the existence and severity of cracks, misaligned joints, root intrusion, deposits, or debris, and potential sources of infiltration.

The video inspections were performed by National Plant Services (NPS). The CCTV inspection data was collected using the latest version of the Granite software (Granite Net) developed by CUES. The information collected was assembled and included in a comprehensive database.

8.2.1 Inspection Criteria and Procedures
National Association of Sewer Service Companies (NASSCO) inspection codes and ratings were used for CCTV inspections. Implementation of the NASSCO codes provides a consistent method in which the inspections were conducted, and the observations noted.

For each pipe segment inspected, the video record and inspection log were independently reviewed as a quality check for the noted observations and respective ratings included in the database and as confirmation that the data provided for performing the condition assessment was acceptable. The video inspection log for each pipeline was analyzed and rated to indicate the overall severity of the pipeline condition using a scale of “A” through “E”. Table 8-1 provides a summary of the pipeline condition severity ratings and the recommended response time to complete the recommended action.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 59
Table 8-1 Pipeline Condition Severity Rating

A B C D E
Good Adequate Moderate Poor Failing
Maintenance 5+ years 3 - 5 years 1 - 2 years Immediate
The severity rating assigned to each pipe segment is based on the criteria listed in Table 8-2 to assure consistency and uniformity in the assessment process.

Table 8-2 Pipeline Condition Assessment Severity Criteria Observation
Severity Rating

A B C D E
Cracks
None Very small hair line
crack(s)
Hair line crack(s) <50%
of ID in length
Cracks ≤1/8” wide or
>50% of ID in length Cracks >1/8” wide
• Circular
• Longitudinal
• Multiple
Broken Pipe None Connecting cracks,
no displacement
Connecting cracks,
displacement
≤ ¼”
Connecting cracks,
displacement
> ¼”
Collapsed pipe,
impassable
Joints - Offset Minimal Up to ½ of the pipe
thickness
½ to thickness
of the pipe
Thickness of
the pipe to 1 ½ times
> 1 ½ times the
thickness of the
pipe
Joints – Separation None Gasket exposed Bell exposed Dirt exposed at top Dirt exposed at invert
Roots Minimal 10% to 35%
Fine roots
35% to 60%
Fine/medium roots
60% to 80%
Medium roots
80% to 100%
Tap root(s) visible
Grease None ≤¼” thick ¼” to ½” thick ½” to 2” thick >2” thick Debris
Accumulation Minimal Sporadic deposits (no rocks) ≤10% of ID (no rocks) 10% to 25% of ID and/or rocks >25% of ID or
impassable
Erosion
(typical concrete
pipe)
None Rough surface Exposed aggregate Exposed rebar Missing concrete Corrosion (metal
pipe only) None Minimal Light tuberculation Moderate tuberculation Impassable, heavy
tuberculation
Mineral Deposits None Minimal (possible
infiltration)
≤10% ID
thickness
>10% ID
thickness
Impassable, heavy
mineral deposits
Infiltration None Dripping Seeping Constant stream Gushing water Sag None Minimal (probably
not perceptible) ≤25% of ID 25% to 75% of ID >75% of ID Flow Capacity Minimal 2/5 or less full 2/5 to ½ full ½ to ¾ full ¾ to totally full NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 60
Using the applicable observations and assigned severity rating, a preliminary recommendation for each pipeline segment was provided. Table 8-3 summarizes the preliminary recommendation criteria for each observed condition and severity rating.

Table 8-3 Preliminary Recommendation Criteria
Observation
Severity Rating

A B C D E
Cracks
No Action No Action No Action or
Rehabilitate
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate
• Circular
• Longitudinal
• Multiple
Broken Pipe No Action No Action No Action, Point Repair or Rehabilitate
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate
Joints - Offset No Action No Action No Action, Point Repair or Replace
Point Repair or
Replace
Point Repair or
Replace
Roots No Action Root
Treatment
Root Treatment or
Rehabilitate Rehabilitate Rehabilitate orReplace
Grease No Action Clean Clean Clean Clean
Debris
Accumulation No Action Clean Clean Clean Clean
Erosion
(concrete pipe) No Action No Action No Action or Replace Replace Replace Mineral Deposits No Action Clean Clean or Point Repair / Rehabilitate / Replace
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate / Replace
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate / Replace
Infiltration No Action No Action No Action or Point
Repair / Rehabilitate
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate
Point Repair or
Rehabilitate
Sag No Action No Action No Action or Replace Replace Replace Flow Capacity No Action No Action No Action Clean and Evaluate Capacity
Clean and Evaluate
Capacity

8.3 PIPELINE CONDITION ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Approximately 47 miles of sewer pipeline were inspected between August 2022 and April 2024, which is approximately 94 percent of the entire sewer system. The remaining portion of the system that was not inspected, approximately 3 miles, consists primarily of pipelines that are owned or maintained by other agencies, pipelines in private easements, and newly constructed pipelines. Table 8-4 includes a summary of the length of pipe inspected based on material.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 61
Table 8-4 Pipelines Inspected
Material Length (Miles) Percentage
VCP 44.4 94.0%
PVC 0.6 1.3%
Concrete 0.3 0.6%
Lined 1.9 4.0%
Total 47.2 100.0%
Condition assessment results for each pipe segment inspected are included in Appendix 4, including the primary defect(s) identified, the assigned pipeline condition severity rating, and a preliminary recommendation. Note that the preliminary recommendations provided are for general planning purposes only and should be further evaluated during final design of any pipeline improvements.

Table 8-5 and Figure 8-1 below provide a summary of the assigned pipeline condition severity ratings based on the length of pipe inspected.

Table 8-5 Condition Assessment - Severity Ratings Summary

Severity Ratings
Total

A B C D E
Length (Miles) 7.8 15.4 16.9 5.7 1.4 47.2
Percent by Length 16.5% 32.6% 35.8% 12.1% 3.0% 100.0%

Figure 8-1 Condition Assessment – Severity Rating Summary A
16%
B
33% C
36%
D
12%
E
3%

A B C D E
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 62
Table 8-6 and Figure 8-2 below provide a summary of the preliminary recommendations provided based on length of pipe inspected. Note that the length listed for point repairs is the total inspected length of all pipe segments with a point repair recommendation. The actual length of recommended point repairs will need to be determined during design.

Table 8-6 Condition Assessment - Preliminary Recommendations Summary Preliminary Recommendation Length (Miles) Percentage
No Action 12.8 27.1%
Clean 15.1 32.0%
Clean and CCTV 1.1 2.3%
Root Treatment 1.8 3.8%
Rehabilitate (Lining) 8.6 18.2%
Point Repair 5.4 11.4%
Replace 2.4 5.1%
Total 47.2 100%

Figure 8-2 Condition Assessment – Preliminary Recommendations Summary Based on the preliminary recommendations, approximately 38 percent of the pipelines inspected will benefit from thorough maintenance / cleaning, while approximately 35 percent require improvements including point repairs, rehabilitation, and replacement.

Figure 8-3 illustrates the condition severity rating and preliminary recommendations provided for inspected sewer pipelines throughout the sewer system.

No Action
27%
Clean
32%
Clean and CCTV
2%
Root Treatment
4%
Rehabilitate (Lining)
18%
Point Repair
12%
Replace
5%
No Action Clean Clean and CCTV Root Treatment Rehabilitate (Lining) Point Repair Replace

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

LESSUE AVE

WINSTON RD

FERN AVE

SENTRY DR

SHERRILL ST

CODY DR

MAIN ST

SANTA RITA AVE

LOWDEN ST

KERMORE LN

ASHDALE ST

SANTA ROSALIA ST

SANDALWOOD WAY

ASBURY AVE

AMY AVE

VANTAGE ST

LOWDEN ST

PACIFIC AVE

SHERRILL ST KENNELLY LN

COURT ST

BRIARWOOD ST

SAN MARCOS DR

DALE ST

YANA DR

STARR ST

GRANDOAKS DR

ORANGEWOOD AVE

CHANTICLEER RD

HAMDEN AVE

SANTA ROSALIA ST

IDYLWILD DR

THUNDERBIRD LN

SANTA CRUZ ST

SANTA CATALINA AVE

STANTON AVE

LOLA AVE
OAK ST

CEDAR ST

COURT LN PACIFIC ST

DAVMOR AVE

FLOWER ST

CENTRAL AVE

CHESTER AVE

STANFORD AVE

ACACIA AVE

DATE ST

STARDUST LN

TINA WAY

CRIS AVE

LULLABY LN

CAMUS LN

LULLABY LN

HARRIET LN

ORRWAY DR

SKYLINE DR

VIA KANNELA

BOATMAN AVE

SYCAMORE AVE

INDUSTRIAL WAY

FILLMORE DR

CAPISTRANO DR

FLOWER AVE

HOOVER ST

CHESTNUT AVE

MITCHELL DR
UP RR

COURT ST

HYNES RD

RUTHANN AVE

SYCAMORE ST

ROSE AVE

ELECTRIC AVE

SANTA GERTRUDES AVE

CATHERINE AVE

LOLA AVE

DALE AVE

LEAFWOOD ST

BENTLY AVE

DEVONWOOD AVE

SANTA MONICA AVE

SANTA BARBARA AVE

LEXINGTON ST

WASCO RD

MACDUFF ST
1ST ST

STANDUSTRIAL ST

JANE WAY

PINE TREE LN

PALAIS RD

SANTA MARIA ST
2ND ST

BOCK AVE

BELL ST

SEABOARD C RI

ARROWHEAD ST

YORKSHIRE AVE

HOPI RD

JOEL AVE

EILEEN ST

VIA IRANA

CEDAR ST

LAMBERT WAY
Legend
Condition Assessment
Preliminary Recommendation (Severity)
Replace (E)
Point Repair (E)
Replace (D)
Point Repair (D)
Lining (D)
Other (B,C)
Clean and CCTV (D,E)
Clean (B,C)
No Action (A,B,C)
Needs Assessment
City Boundary
0 400 800
±
1,600 2,400
Feet

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

CYPRESS

CITY OF

WESTMINSTER

CITY OF

GARDEN GROVE

CITY OF

BUENA PARK

CITY OF

ANAHEIM
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
B
E
A
C
H
B
LV
D
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
W
E
S
T
E
R
N
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
K
N
O
T
T
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
D
A
L
E
AV
E
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T
M
A
G
N
O
LIA
S
T

GARDEN GROVE BLVD

LAMPSON AVE LAMPSON AVE

CHAPMAN AVE CHAPMAN AVE

ORANGEWOOD AVE ORANGEWOOD AVE

KATELLA AVE KATELLA AVE

CERRITO AVE

BALL RD BALL RD
405 FWY
Project No.
227522-0001381
Date: May 2024
City of Stanton
Sewer Master Plan Update
Figure 8-3
Condition Assessment
Preliminary Recommendations
and Severity Rating
NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 64

9.0 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
The City’s Public Works Department is responsible for the inspection, operation, and maintenance of the City’s wastewater collection system including the access manholes and related appurtenances. The City’s Operations and Maintenance (O&M) program for its wastewater collection system is administered by the City’s Public Works Department which secures the contracted services to clean the collection system to ensure a well-functioning wastewater system that meets the current and future needs of the community.

9.1 BACKGROUND
The City’s Public Works Department is responsible for ensuring the implementation of City and regulatory agency policies and procedures to ensure that wastewater operations are effective and economical. A well-maintained sanitary sewer system is critical to preventing community nuisances, such as odors resulting from high hydrogen sulfide gas (H2S), preventing sewer spills for the mutual protection of surface waters and the environment, and to safeguard public health and safety that may potentially result in significant penalties. System information collected during operations and maintenance activities is provided to the Public Works Department who prioritizes the capital improvement projects.

9.2 OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE
The City of Stanton and the Garden Grove Sanitation District executed a Joint Use (Cooperative) Sanitary Sewer Agreement in 2008 which defines the maintenance and operation responsibilities for sanitary sewer facilities shared by the two agencies. Per the agreement each agency is responsible for routine maintenance of shared sewers which are located within their respective jurisdictions. The agreement granted both agencies capacity rights for the shared sanitary sewers and defines cost sharing for repair or replacement of shared sewers, which is apportioned to each agency based on flows set forth in the agreement. Included in Appendix 5 is a copy of the executed Cooperative Sanitary Sewer Agreement.

Figure 9-1 graphically illustrates the ownership and maintenance responsibilities between the City of Stanton and the Garden Grove Sanitation District based on the agreement. NV5 recommends that the City and the District update the agreement to reflect any system changes since 2008 and delineate maintenance responsibilities for shared sewer segments which cross jurisdictional boundaries.

9.3 SUMMARY OF OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
Elements of the City’s O&M Program include proactive, preventive and corrective maintenance of gravity sewers. The City is responsible for ensuring the implementation of City and regulatory agency policies and procedures to ensure that wastewater operations are effective and economical.

9.3.1 Review of Cleaning/Preventive Maintenance Program An effective O&M Program helps to identify and prevent blockages in gravity sewers caused by structural defects or by accumulation of debris in the pipeline. Debris that can accumulate in the pipelines include fats, oil, grease, sediment, or other materials. Certain structural defects may trap debris and result in accumulated buildup of solids. Root intrusion through structural defects may result NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 65
in blockages. Thus, repair or elimination of any defects that contribute to buildup of material is evaluated as part of the rehabilitation program as defects will create maintenance challenges.

To minimize and prevent system blockages that can lead to sewer system overflows (SSOs) the City’s Operations and Maintenance Program primarily includes performing regular citywide cleaning of the collection system. The City plans to develop and refine an appropriate schedule and target for cleaning its system.

9.3.1.1 Mechanical Cleaning Procedures
The City contracts outside services to conduct routine mechanical cleaning of the City’s wastewater collection pipelines using a combination jet rodder/vactor truck(s). As the citywide cleaning is conducted, the date and location that at which cleaning occurred is captured. Thus, the locations and maintenance history of the City’s maintained wastewater system pipes and associated appurtenances are documented.

9.3.1.2 High Frequency Maintenance Locations
The City’s preventative maintenance program includes attention to locations that have been identified as High Frequency Maintenance Locations (HFMLs). The HFMLs include approximately 139 pipeline segments that have been identified as having reoccurring problems and which require more frequent maintenance and cleaning. Contracted crews clean HFMLs on a quarterly basis. Included in Appendix 6 is a summary of the HFMLs. The HFMLs within City are presented in Figure 9-2 and include several of the City’s pipelines with sags and the accumulation of grease, roots and debris.

9.4 SUMMARY OF INSPECTION AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM
Inspection, documentation, and assessment of condition of the sanitary sewer pipelines and manholes are important components for properly maintaining and operating a sewer collection system.

Collectively the components are used to evaluate and identify potential maintenance issues and structural defects which can contribute to potential sanitary overflows.

CCTV cameras offer valuable insight into the structural and maintenance condition of underground infrastructure. Video inspection of sewer pipelines is used to evaluate the existence and severity of cracks, misaligned joints, accumulation of roots or silt, and potential sources of infiltration. Information obtained from routine inspections serves to:
• Identify existing or potential problems
• Provide accurate information regarding any existing or potential problems • Isolate the location of any existing or potential problems • Provide information regarding the severity of any existing or potential problems • Facilitate identification of the optimal method to rectify existing or potential problems Performing CCTV inspections of the entire system on an established schedule will allow the City to continue to maintain a comprehensive list of potential improvement projects. Consequently, recommendations for improvements based on the noted defects will assist in optimizing the expenditures for the wastewater collection system by improvement method.

NV5 Project Number 227522-0001381.00 NV5.COM | 66
It is recommended that the City consider development and implementation of an inspection program to inspect the condition of its gravity sewers on a 5-year cycle and to use the information obtained during implementation of its operations and maintenance program for identifying and prioritizing projects for the necessary improvements.

As mentioned previously, it is also recommended that the City consider development and implementation of a formal manhole inspection and assessment program to identify and prioritize manhole rehabilitations and replacements. Manholes should also be visually inspected during either maintenance and/or annual cleaning of the pipelines, information be documented, and defects noted for tracking and reporting purposes.

9.4.1 Pipeline Inspection Criteria and Documentation Procedures The City does not currently have a formally established CCTV Inspection and Assessment Program with periodic and systematic inspection of the sanitary sewer system pipelines and manholes. The City employed CCTV technology for the inspection of system pipelines in 2009 and 2022-2024 for the preparation of master plan updates. Most recently, the information was documented using NASSCO codes and collected in digital format to facilitate record keeping, reporting, and retrieval of information in a timely manner.

It is recommended the City develop and implement a formal and strategic inspection and assessment program that includes the sewer pipelines and manholes. Including the inspection and assessment of the system manholes will provide the City with a thorough understanding of the condition of the entire collection system and allow for development of a comprehensive plan to address the system needs.

9.4.2 Documentation of Inspection Findings
As the City considers development of an inspection and assessment program, application of NASSCO inspection codes and ratings to document the observations noted during the inspection process will provide a consistent method in the manner in which the inspections are conducted, and the observations and ratings noted. Structural type observations are distinguished from maintenance type observations with the use of an “S” to denote a structural observation while an “M” is used to denote maintenance related observations.

The numeric severity rating (1-5) assigned to the specific structural and/or maintenance observations are also defined. A NASSCO severity rating of one (1) is minor while a severity rating of five (5) is severe.

The severity ratings, as noted, are automatically assigned based on the structural and/or maintenance observation noted by the CCTV operator.

Included in Chapter 8 are the procedures and criteria employed for conducting inspection and assessment of the City’s collection system for purposes of the Master Plan Update. As the collection system continues to age, it is recommended the City consider incorporating an inspection and assessment program that allows the City to regularly and consistently document the characteristics of the collection system and prioritize condition related improvements. !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!!
! ! !!
!
! !
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! !!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! ! !
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! ! ! !! !
! !
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! !
! ! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
! !
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
! ! !
!
! !
! !
!
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
!
!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
!
!
! !
!
!
!
!
!!
! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!

WESTERN AVE IDYLWILD
DR

GRANT WAY

COLLEGE DR

MONROE AVE

COURT ST

FULTON WAY

Stanton City CouncilJuly 9, 2024

Stanton City Council
July 9, 2024