City Council and Concurrent Authorities
March 22, 2022

POLICYSAF‐2.1
Ensure that community members are adequately prepared for natural disasters and emergencies through education and training.

Action SAF‐

2.1A
Develop neighborhood watch and emergency support groups to be trained and put into action in the event of an emergency in support of government staff.

GP, CPTED CD, CS, PD, CM, OES Neighborhood Watch Groups were developed to encourage citizen involvement and deter crime by early detection.

Ongoing.

Attachment A
1160
17 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)
Emergency Preparedness is managed by the City's Office of Emergency Services (OES) for disaster preparedness, readiness, City departments response, and mitigation. OES offers information online to assist citizens in in disaster preparedness.
http://www.stocktongov.com/government/departments/fire/emerge.html Action SAF‐

2.1B
Inform the public about the specific risks of living in flood‐prone areas and provide residents instructional information on how to take steps to reduce their exposure to flood damages.

GP, SMC CD, PW The Building Life and Safety Division works in coordination with Federal and State agencies to information the public about flood risks. http://www.stocktongov.com/government/departments/communityDevelop/cdBuildState.html Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐2.2
Prepare sufficiently for major events to enable quick and effective response.

Action SAF‐

2.2A
Require new development to provide adequate access for emergency vehicles and evacuation routes, including by designing roadway systems to provide multiple escape routes in the event of a levee failure.

GP, SMC CD, Fire Staff currently reviews entitlement and permit applications for health and safety compliance.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.2B
Formulate, review, periodically update, and make available to the public emergency management plans (EMP) for the safe evacuation of people from areas subject to inundation from levee and dam failure.

GP, EMP CD, Fire Staff currently reviews entitlement and permit applications for health and safety compliance. Emergency plan review will include coordination within SJCOG for resiliency and adaptation. Additional information on emergency evacuations in the event of a flood are published on the Fire Department’s website athttp://www.stocktonca.gov/government/departments/fire/emeFlood.html Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.2C
Require new critical facilities, including hospitals, emergency operations centers, communications facilities, fire stations, and police stations, to be located, designed, and constructed to avoid or mitigate potential risks and ensure functional operation during flood events (i.e., avoid locating in the 100‐year and 200‐year floodplains), seismic and geological events, fires, and explosions.

GP, SMC PW, Fire Staff currently reviews entitlement and permit applications for health and safety compliance. Staff will review emergency plans with coordination within SJCOG for resiliency and adaptation.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.2D
Continue to work with San Joaquin County, the County Office of Emergency Services, other cities in the region, and disaster agencies to coordinate disaster and emergency preparedness planning.

GP, EMP, CAP CD, Fire Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐2.3
Protect the community from potential flood events.

Action SAF‐

2.3A
Coordinate with appropriate State, federal, and local flood control agencies to develop a flood protection plan for the levee systems protecting the city that:
■ Identifies the levees protecting the city and the entities responsible for the operation and maintenance of the levees;
■ Determines the flood levels in the waterways and the level of protection offered by the existing levees along the waterways; ■ Identifies a long‐term plan to upgrade the system as necessary to provide at least a 100‐year level of flood protection to the city, and 200‐year level of flood protection, where feasible;
■ Encourages multi‐purpose flood management projects that, where feasible, incorporate recreation, resource conservation, preservation of natural riparian habitat, and scenic values of the city's streams, creeks, and lakes; and
■ Includes provisions for updates to reflect future State or federally mandated levels of flood protection.

GP, EMP CD, Fire Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.3B
Collaborate with State and local flood management agencies and other interested parties to develop funding mechanisms to finance the local share of flood management responsibilities, and maintain GP, EMP, PFF CD, Fire Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

Attachment A
1161
18 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)
cooperative working relationships with appropriate agencies to minimize flood hazards and improve safety.

Action SAF‐

2.3C
Require new public and private waterfront development to be oriented to waterways and provide setbacks and easements along levees and channels to provide space for levee widening, flood fighting, roadway and maintenance access, open space and trail amenities, and appropriate landscaping.

GP, SMC CD, Fire Staff will continue coordination. Reviewed as part of the entitlement and permit application process.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.3D
Prepare and maintain a map of evacuation routes for major flood events
GP, EMP PW, Fire Additional information on emergency evacuations in the event of a flood are published on the Fire Department’s website at
http://www.stocktonca.gov/government/departments/fire/emeFlood.html Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐2.4
Minimize risks to the community from flooding through appropriate siting and protection of structures and occupants.

Action SAF‐

2.4A
Regulate new urban development in accordance with State requirements for 200‐year level of flood protection and federal requirements for 100‐year level of flood protection.

GP, SMC CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. These are currently reviewed as part of the entitlement and permit applications process.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.4B
Investigate and implement when feasible mitigation measures that offer 200‐year level of flood protection for existing urban development in flood‐prone areas.

GP, SMC, EMP CD, PW Staff will continue coordination and can possibly investigate historical flood data for mapping and project coordination. These are currently reviewed as part of the entitlement and permit applications process.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.4C
Preserve floodways and floodplains for non‐urban uses to maintain existing flood carrying capacities, except when mitigated in conformance with the City's floodplain management program.

GP, SMC PW Staff will continue coordination. These are currently reviewed as part of the entitlement and permit applications process.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.4D
Consider the best available flood hazard information and mapping from regional, State, and federal agencies to inform land use and public facilities investment decisions
GP, SMC, EMP CD, PW Staff will continue coordination and can possibly investigate historical flood data for mapping and project coordination. These are currently reviewed as part of the entitlement and permit applications process.

Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐2.5
Protect the community from health hazards and annoyance associated with excessive noise levels
Public Health
Action SAF‐

2.5A
Prohibit new commercial, industrial, or other noise generating land uses adjacent to existing sensitive noise receptors such as residential uses, schools, health care facilities, libraries, and churches if noise levels are expected to exceed 70 dBA Community Noise Equivalent (CNEL) (decibels on A‐weighted scale CNEL) when measured at the property line of the noise sensitive land use.

Public Health GP, SMC CD, CS Staff will continue to require noise studies for projects that may generate significant levels of noise and apply mitigation accordingly. Where mitigation cannot be placed, staff will make recommendations on a case‐by‐case basis and enforce the noise standards.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.5B
Require projects that would locate noise sensitive land uses where the projected ambient noise level is greater than the "normally acceptable" noise level indicated on Table 5‐1 to provide an acoustical analysis that shall:
■ Be the responsibility of the applicant;
■ Be prepared by a qualified person experienced in the fields of environmental noise assessment and architectural acoustics; ■ Include representative noise level measurements with sufficient sampling periods and locations to adequately describe local conditions;■ Estimate existing and projected (20‐year) noise levels in terms of Ldn/CNEL and compare the levels to the adopted noise policies and actions in this General Plan;
■ Recommend appropriate mitigation to achieve compatibility with the adopted noise policies and standards;
■ Where the noise source in question consists of intermittent single events, address the effects of maximum noise levels in sleeping rooms in terms of possible sleep disturbance;
Public Health GP, SMC CD, CS Staff will continue to require noise studies for projects that may generate significant levels of noise and apply mitigation accordingly. Where mitigation cannot be placed, staff will make recommendations on a case‐by‐case basis and enforce the noise standards.

Ongoing.

Attachment A
1162
19 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)
■ Estimate noise exposure after the prescribed mitigation measures have been implemented;
■ If the project does not comply with the adopted standards and policies of this General Plan, provide acoustical information for a statement of overriding considerations for the project; and ■ Describe a post‐project assessment program, which could be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures.

Action SAF‐

2.5C
Require noise produced by commercial uses to not exceed 75 dB Ldn/CNEL at the nearest property line.

Public Health GP, SMC CD, CS Staff will continue to require noise studies for projects that may generate significant levels of noise and apply mitigation accordingly. Where mitigation cannot be placed, staff will make recommendations on a case‐by‐case basis and enforce the noise standards.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.5D
Grant exceptions to the noise standards for commercial and industrial uses only if a recorded noise easement is conveyed by the affected property owners.

Public Health GP, SMC CD, CS Staff will continue to require noise studies for projects that may generate significant levels of noise and apply mitigation accordingly.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.5E
Require all new habitable structures to be set back from railroad tracks to protect residents from noise, vibration, and safety impacts Public Health GP, SMC CD, CS Staff will continue to require noise studies for projects that may generate significant levels of noise and apply mitigation accordingly.

Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐2.6
Minimize the risk to city residents and property associated with the transport, distribution, use, and storage of hazardous materials.

Public Health
Action SAF‐

2.6A
Restrict transport of hazardous materials within the city to routes that have been designated for such transport.

Public Health EMP Fire Continue to review and enforce on a case‐by‐case basis. Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.6B
When appropriate, require new development to prepare a hazardous materials inventory and/or prepare Phase I or Phase II hazardous materials studies, including any required cleanup measures.

Public Health GP, SMC CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Reviewed as part of the entitlement and permit application process.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

2.6C
Educate the public regarding the types of household hazardous wastes and the proper methods of disposal
Public Health GP, SMC CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

GOAL SAF‐
3:

CLEAN WATER: Sustain clean and adequate water supplies.

POLICYSAF‐3.1
Secure long‐term renewable contracts and related agreements to ensure that surface water rights will be available to meet projected demand.

Action SAF‐

3.1A
Actively participate in appropriate forums designed to discuss and solve regional water supply and quality issues.

GP, SMC CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐3.2
Protect the availability of clean potable water from groundwater sources.

Public health
Action SAF‐

3.2A
Continue to cooperate with San Joaquin County, Stockton East Water District, and CalWater to monitor groundwater withdrawals and ensure that they fall within the target yield for the drinking water aquifer.

GP, SMC CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

3.2B
Require new development to employ low impact development (LID) approaches, including:
■ Conserving natural areas and reducing imperviousness
■ Runoff storage
■ Hydro‐modification (to mimic pre‐development runoff volume and flow rate)■ Reducing trash accumulation
■ Public education and outreach
GP, SMC, CSWRCB CD, MUD Staff will continue to implement as part of entitlement and permit review. Ongoing.

Attachment A
1163
20 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)  POLICYSAF‐3.3
Encourage use of recycled ("gray") water for landscaping irrigation to reduce demand on potable supplies.

Action SAF‐

3.3A
Require new development to install non‐potable water infrastructure for irrigation of large landscaped areas where feasible.

CRWQCBCVR‐R5‐
2007‐0173
CD, MUD Staff will continue to implement as part of entitlement and permit review. Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

3.3B
Investigate and implement Code amendments to allow installation of dual plumbing and/or rainwater capture systems to enable use of recycled water and/or captured rainwater generated on‐site.

SMC,CRWQCBCVR‐R5‐
2007‐0173
CD, MUD Staff will continue to implement as part of entitlement and permit review. 2022 and Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐3.4
Ensure adequate collection, treatment, and safe disposal of wastewater.

Action SAF‐

3.4A
Require all new urban development to be served by an adequate wastewater collection system to avoid possible contamination of groundwater from onsite wastewater disposal systems.

Public health SMC PW, MUD Staff will continue to implement as part of entitlement and permit review. Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

3.4B
Conduct outreach and provide information to encourage
homeowners with septic tanks to abandon existing septic tanks and hook up to the City wastewater collection system.

Public health SMC PW, MUD Staff will continue to implement as part of entitlement and permit review.

The city will explore existing and future outreach options. 2022 and Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

3.4C
Continue to discharge treated effluent to the Delta and reuse that water through the City’s California Water Code Section 1485 water right18.

GP, SMC CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

GOAL SAF‐
4:

CLEAN AIR: Improve local Air quality.

POLICYSAF‐4.1
Reduce Air impacts from mobile and stationary sources of Airpollution.

Air quality,
public health
Action SAF‐

4.1A
Require the construction and operation of new development to implement best practices that reduce Air pollutant emissions, including:■ Use of low‐emission and well‐maintained construction equipment, with idling time limits.
■ Development and implementation of a dust control plan during construction.■ Installation of electrical service connections at loading docks, where appropriate.■ Installation of Energy Star‐certified appliances. ■ Entering into Voluntary Emissions Reduction Agreements with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.

Air quality,
public health
GP, AQMP CD Staff will continue to implement as part of entitlement and permit review and approvals.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

4.1B
Use the results of the Health Risk Assessments required by the California Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Act to establish appropriate land use buffer zones around any new sources of toxic Air pollutants that pose substantial health risks.

Air quality,
public health
GP, AQMD CD, Air District Staff will continue coordination and can possibly investigate historical data for mapping and project coordination. These are currently reviewed as part of the entitlement and permit application process.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

4.1C
Require the use of electric‐powered construction and landscaping equipment as conditions of project approval when appropriate.

Air quality,
public health
GP, AQMD CD CAP and building requirements will continue to be integrated into entitlement and permit application process.

Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

4.1D
Limit heavy‐duty off‐road equipment idling time to meet the California Air Resources Board’s idling regulations for on‐road trucks.

Air quality,
public health
GP, AQMD CD CAP and building requirements will continue to be integrated into entitlement and permit application process.

Ongoing.
18 California Water Boards‐ SWRCB‐Statutory Water Rights Law https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/laws_regulations/docs/wrlaws.pdf Attachment A
1164
21 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)  POLICYSAF‐4.2
Encourage major employers to participate in a transportation demand management program (TDM) that reduces vehicle tripsthrough approaches such as carpooling, vanpooling, shuttles, car‐sharing, bike sharing, end‐of‐trip facilities like showers and bicycleparking, subscription bus service, transit subsidies, preferentialparking, and telecommuting.

Air quality,
public health
Action SAF‐

4.2A
Provide information and conduct marketing and outreach to major existing and new employers about the transportation demand management (TDM) program facilitated by the San Joaquin Council of Governments.

Air quality,
public health
GP, TDM CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

POLICYSAF‐4.3
Coordinate with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District and non‐profit organizations to promote public awareness on Airquality issues and consistency in Air quality impacts analyses.

Air quality,
Action SAF‐

4.3A
Distribute educational materials from the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District on the City’s website and at its Permit Center.

Air quality, GP, Air District CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

Action SAF‐

4.3B
Coordinate review of development project applications with the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District to ensure that Air quality impacts are consistently identified and mitigated during CEQA review.

Air quality, GP, AQMD CD CAP, AQMD, and building requirements will continue to be integrated into entitlement and permit applications process.

Ongoing.

GOAL CH‐1:  HEALTHY PEOPLE: Support the ability of the entire community to maintain healthy lifestyles.

POLICY CH‐1.1
Maintain walking and wheeling facilities and parks that are safe and accessible in all areas of Stockton.

Public health,Air quality,
climate change.

Action CH‐

1.1A
Plant and maintain appropriate shade trees along all City streets to reduce heat exposure, prioritizing areas of the city with significantly less tree canopy, and provide a buffer between the travel way and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and provide other amenities like well‐ marked crosswalks, bulb‐outs, and pedestrian‐scale street lighting.

Public health,Air quality,
climate change.

GP CD CAP and building requirements will continue to be integrated into entitlement and permit application process.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.1B
Prepare a parks master plan through an open and engaging process inclusive of community residents that assesses the quality and distribution of existing parks, facilities, and community centers throughout the city relative to the population served (i.e., within a set walking distance) and their needs (i.e., considering age, income, and abilities), and, based on this information, identifies and prioritizes new, renovation, and expansion park and community center projects and describes funding means and timelines.

Public health, EJ GP CD, PW Park requirements will continue to be integrated into entitlement and permit application process. Existing approvals will be implemented through construction and amendment review.

Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐1.2
Promote healthy retail food choices within and adjacent to residential areas
Public Health
Action CH‐

1.2A
Adapt, expand, and target existing small business development programs to provide training, promotion, and technical, financial, and business assistance to small neighborhood grocery and convenience stores that provide healthy food and accept Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP or CalFresh) and Supplemental Nutrition for Women, Infants and Children (WIC).

Public health, EJ GP CD, PW, ED The City offers Stocked Full of Produce, a grant program for neighborhood grocery and convenience stores to encourage the sale of healthy food options. Incentive is listed on the website www.stocktonca.gov/produce.

Staff will continue coordination to market other business resources.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.2B
Prepare a healthy food ordinance that creates incentives and guidelines that support access to healthy food, such as standards requiring that a percent of sales area in neighborhood food and beverage stores be devoted to healthy foods and/or requiring acceptance of CalFresh and WIC. As part of this ordinance, collect geographic data about current health conditions, and discourage unhealthy food establishments (e.g., mini markets and fast food Public health, EJ CD, PW Stockton’s first Urban Agricultural Ordinance for those who live within the city limits of Stockton was approved by the Stockton City Council on September 15, 2020. The ordinance makes it possible for Stockton residents to keep chickens (no roosters), ducks and/or bees, and allows for additional types of produce stands to sell locally grown fruits and vegetables. In 2021, ED allocated CDBG‐CV Cares Act funds of $400,000 to the Urban Agriculture Ongoing.

Attachment A
1165
22 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)
restaurants) in neighborhoods with high rates of obesity and/or diabetes.
& Food Insecurity Program and $107,650 to the Urban Farmers & Cottage Food Grant Program.

Action CH‐

1.2C
Collaborate with non‐profit partners and San Joaquin County Public Health Services to attract full‐service grocery stores in areas that lack access to fresh food and/or are at a high risk of obesity and diabetes.

Public health, EJ GP CD, CM The City’s Stocked Full of Produce Grant Program addresses food insecurity through grant funding to help with infrastructure upgrades to retail stores, to promote sale and storage of healthier food options. Grants can be used for improvements, such as installing new refrigeration or shelving. Grant funds are available up to $10,000. Eligible properties must be retail outlets such as corner stores or convenience stores, located within the City of Stockton limits, and within one of the targeted areas according to the Stocked Full of Produce program map.
http://www.stocktongov.com/government/departments/econDev/eDevBusAss.html Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.2D
Prioritize pedestrian and active transportation improvement projects in low‐income/disadvantaged communities that connect residential areas to retail locations that sell healthy food.

Public health,
Air quality,
climate change
GP CD Pedestrian requirements will continue to be integrated into entitlement and permit applications process. Staff will explore other options to integrate enhanced design into existing areas.

Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐1.3
Encourage activities that support local agriculture, such as farmers’ markets, urbanfarming and community gardening.

Public health
Action CH‐

1.3A
Provide public land, traffic control, cleanup, and other City services to farmers’ markets, including technical assistance to encourage markets to accept CalFresh and WIC.

Public health, EJ GP ED, CD Staff will explore possibility of coordinating with SJC Public Health and farmers markets.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.3B
Create an accessible inventory of publicly‐owned and private vacant sites appropriate for community gardens or other forms of urban agriculture.

Public health GP ED, CD Staff will continue exploring the possibilities of this in 2022. Urban Ag ordinance adopted in 2020.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.3C
Amend the Development Code to include standards for small‐scale, urban local food operations
Public health GP, SMC CD, ED, PW Staff will explore overlay as part of 2022‐2023 code overhaul. 2022 and Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.3D
Adopt and Implement an Urban Agriculture Incentive Zone (per AB 551) to allow privately‐owned vacant property to be productively used for growing food.

Public health GP, SMC CD, ED, PW Urban Ag ordinance adopted in 2020. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.3E
Partner with nonprofits, local farmers and San Joaquin County Public Health Services to conduct public outreach and education to aid in the development of an urban agriculture ordinance.

Public health GP, Air District CD, PW Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

1.3F
Identify new potential locations for farmers’ markets in low‐income and nutrient deficient neighborhoods, including opportunities to hold markets on publicly owned land.

Public health, EJ GP, SMC CD, ED The Stocked Full of Produce Grant Program assists businesses in nutrient deficient neighborhoods. Staff will continue exploring in 2022 to expand upon existing markets https://www.visitstockton.org/blog/farmers‐markets‐ in‐and‐around‐stockton/ and http://www.stocktonfarmersmarket.org/ Ongoing.

GOAL CH‐2  RESTORED COMMUNITIES: Restore disadvantaged communities to help them become more vibrant and cohesive neighborhoods with high‐quality affordable housing, a range of employment options, enhanced social and health services, and active public spaces.

POLICY CH‐2.1
Prioritize maintenance of streets and improvement of sidewalks, parks, and other infrastructure in areas of the city that historicallyhave been comparatively underserved by public facilities, includingimplementation of complete streets where needed, especially inconjunction with infrastructure maintenance and improvementprojects.

Public health.,EJ
Action CH‐

2.1A
When considering parks and infrastructure maintenance and improvement projects, consider the following through an open and engaging process inclusive of community residents:
■ Whether the affected community is underserved or disadvantaged.

EJ GP, MFP PW, CD Staff will explore options. Ongoing.

Attachment A
1166
23 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)
■ What the priority needs of the community are and whether the project would address those needs.
■ Whether the project would negatively impact the community, such as through increased exposure to pollutants or displacement of residents or local businesses.

Action CH‐

2.1B
Provide incentives for rehabilitation or redevelopment of distressed properties that takes into consideration strategies to avoid gentrification.

EJ GP, SMC CD, ED Staff will continue to monitor and provide information and incentives for residentials and business to rehabilitate buildings.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.1C
Develop incentives to promote reuse of distressed areas, such as through re‐zoning, permit streamlining, density bonuses, and other appropriate tools.

EJ GP, SMC CD, ED, PW Incremental Development Code amendments adopted in 2020 include local Density Bonuses of up to 100%, parking reductions for affordable and senior housing, and flexibility and incentives with development standards and housing typology. Further examination of strategies during the 2022‐2023 code overhaul.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.1D
Conduct marketing to potential developers to encourage the redevelopment and conversion of distressed commercial strips into housing and mixed‐use areas that includes strategies to avoid gentrification.

EJ GP, SMC CD, ED, PW The City is participating in SJCOG’s displacement study, which began in 2020, and anticipates utilizing LEAP funds to supplement the study with specific local strategies in 2022.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.1E
Investigate and implement programs that will incentivize landlords to maintain properties free of Municipal Code violations and criminal activity
EJ GP, SMC CD, ED, CS Staff will explore overlay as part of 2021 amendments. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.1F
Work with transit agencies, non‐profit organizations, and communities to maintain and improve transit service in underserved and disadvantaged neighborhoods to connect residents with jobs, shopping, and services.

EJ, Air quality,
climate change
GP, SMC CD, ED, PW In 2020, the California Strategic Growth Council approved an award of $10.8 million to Stockton through the Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) program, which funds community‐led development and infrastructure projects that achieve major environmental, health and economic benefits in California’s most disadvantaged communities.

Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐2.2
Stimulate investment through partnerships with private property owners, neighborhood groups, health and housing advocates,nongovernmental organizations, and other community supporters.

EJ
Action CH‐

2.2A
Aggressively facilitate the conservation and rehabilitation of older neighborhoods through the following approaches:
■ Utilize all federal, State, and local programs for conservation and rehabilitation projects.■ Prioritize older disadvantaged neighborhoods for investment using funds such as the Community Development Block Grants.
■ Encourage private investment in older neighborhoods.
■ Cooperate in joint public‐private partnerships to invest in older neighborhoods.

EJ GP, HE ED, CD Coordination with business and property owners will continue and staff will maintain and improve underutilized and housing condition survey list. ED Staff will continue to actively participate in the South Stockton Promise Zone working group https://rsscoalition.org/.

In 2020, the California Strategic Growth Council approved an award of $10.8 million to Stockton through the Transformative Climate Communities (TCC) program, which funds community‐led development and infrastructure projects that achieve major environmental, health and economic benefits in California’s most disadvantaged communities.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.2B
Establish Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Overlay Zones around the Robert J. Cabral ACE Train Station and the San Joaquin Street Amtrak Station to promote high density residential, including affordable and mixed income housing, and other TOD.

Downtown,public health,Air quality,
climate change
GP, SMC CD, ED, PW Staff will explore overlay as part of 2022‐2023 code overhaul. 2022 and Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.2C
Evaluate and implement adjustments to the Public Facilities Fee structure to promote development in the Downtown.

Downtown GP, PFF CD, ED PFF to be updated in 2023. The city currently operates a PFF reduction program for DTA areas.
http://www.stocktongov.com/government/departments/econDev/eDevBu sPffep.html
Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.2D
Collaborate with non‐profit partners and San Joaquin Public Health Services to attract medical clinics, mental health facilities, and pharmacies in areas that lack access to health care.

Public health, EJ GP ED Ongoing project meetings held with Community Medical Centers and STAND, agencies committed to develop services to areas in need; continue coordination.

Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐2.3
Focus on reducing the unique and compounded environmental impacts and risks in disadvantaged communities.

Public health, EJ
Attachment A
1167
24 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)  Action CH‐

2.3A
Build strong ties with disadvantaged communities to ensure that local residents can make significant contributions to planning decisions through the following:
■ Use culturally appropriate approaches.
■ Consider the convenience of the timing and locations of meetings to community members.
■ Use social media and other communication techniques for those without time to attend public meetings.
■ Provide translation services and translated materials when needed. ■ Partner with non‐profit organizations who are already active within the community.

EJ GP CD, CM, CD Concurrent with ongoing code overhaul effort, the city will seek to establish strong and robust working groups with various aspects of the community.

Especially Disadvantaged communities and stakeholders.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.3B
Expand efforts to repair and rehabilitate substandard housing in disadvantaged communities, taking into consideration strategies to avoid gentrification.

GP, Fire/Bld Code CD, CS, ED‐H Utilizing CDBG funds, ED staff administers the Emergency Repair Program and the Single‐Family Housing Repair Loan Program to assist low‐income home owners with housing rehabilitation.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.3C
Require applicants for residential remodel and rehabilitation projects to remediate structural health hazards, such as lead‐based paint, mold, mildew, and asbestos.

Public health, EJ GP, Fire/Bld Code CD, CS, ED‐H CDBG rehabilitation funds are subject to Federal environmental standards, requiring mitigation or removal of environmental contaminants to render them harmless.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.3D
Focus enforcement of public health‐related codes in disadvantaged communities, including on properties that are managed by homeowners’ associations.

Public health, EJ GP, SMC CD, PD, CS Staff will establish contact with HOAs for 2022‐2023 code overhaul. As part of amendments options will be discussed with community groups.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

2.3E
Work with wastewater, water, and stormwater utilities to seek funding to complete sewer, water, and stormwater systems in areas within the SOI where parcels still rely on septic systems, wells, and roadside ditches.

Public health, EJ GC, CIP PW, MUD, CD Entitlement, permits, and CIP reviews currently include service reviews for these areas.

Ongoing.

GOAL CH‐3:  SKILLED WORKFORCE: Expand opportunities for local enterprise, entrepreneurship, and gainful employment.

POLICY CH‐3.1
Promote entrepreneurial development and small business expansion.

Action CH‐

3.1A
Coordinate with the Small Business Development Centers and other agencies to provide well‐tailored services and resources for small and minority‐owned businesses.

GP ED Staff will continue coordination with partnering organizations. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

3.1B
Provide training, promotion, and technical, financial, and business assistance to small and minority‐owned businesses.

EJ GP ED The Entrepreneurship Grant Program administered by ED provides funding for organizations that serve as business service providers and aid small businesses.

Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐3.2
Encourage neighborhood‐serving commercial uses in areas where frequently needed goods and services are not widely available,especially for those areas with no availability within a 2‐mile radius.

Public health,EJ, Air quality,
climate change
Action CH‐

3.2A
Work with property owners to develop corridor‐specific strategies for attracting and retaining businesses that will provide synergistic opportunities and improve the availability of goods and services adjacent to residential areas.

Public health,
EJ, Air quality,
climate change
GP ED Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

3.2B
Consider options and develop an ordinance to restrict mini markets, gas stations, fast food restaurants, check cashing establishments, and tobacco stores in areas with high existing concentrations of similar establishments, and continue to restrict over‐concentrations of liquor stores through the City’s Alcohol Ordinance. To inform the development of this ordinance, create a map that identifies the locations of current establishments of these types, and regularly maintain it so that it continues to aid in decision‐making about such uses.

Air quality, EJ GP, SMC CD Staff can explore this as part of the 2022‐2023 code overhaul. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

3.2C
Work with regulators, service providers, and employers to ensure the provision of safe, affordable, and high‐quality childcare services.

Air quality, EJ GP, CAP CD, ED Staff to highlight requirements for entitlements and permit inclusion and possible incentives to encourage more services.

Ongoing.

Attachment A
1168
25 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)  Action CH‐

3.2D
Work with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to avoid over concentration of liquor stores.

EJ GP CD, PD Staff will continue to review license applications on a case‐by‐case basis and include possible proximity standards in the zoning code to avoid over concentration.

Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐3.3
Ensure that Stockton youth and adults have access to the services and resources they need to enhance and renew their vocational andprofessional skills for job readiness and retention.

Action CH‐

3.3A
Collaborate with educational institutions, the San Joaquin County Economic Development Association, and workforce training agencies on programs that educate and train youth for the labor force.

GP ED Efforts underway on the establishment of an apprenticeship program thru SJC; ED staff will continue coordination and follow up.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

3.3B
Continue to work with the San Joaquin County Workforce Investment Board (WIB), the San Joaquin County Economic Development Association (EDA), and similar organizations to develop the workforce GP ED ED Staff will continue coordination, attendance at Board meetings, and participation in local and regional workforce development consortiums.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

3.3C
Continue to work with community‐based organizations that employ local Stockton youth to perform energy efficiency, alternative energy, and water conservation assessments and installations in local homes and businesses.

Climate change GP ED Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐3.4
Foster innovation through access to quality community education and library services
Action CH‐

3.4A
Work with school districts to prioritize the expansion or renovation of existing schools in infill areas and evaluate various approaches to infill area school expansions, such as smaller school sizes (e.g., lower capacity campuses spread through an area) or smaller campus land areas (e.g., multi‐story facilities).

Air quality,
climate change
GP CM Staff will continue coordination with the school districts and Charter schools to review expansion and renovation projects as well as locate and identify locations for new school sites.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

3.4B
Promote the use of City parks and community centers for childcare, youth, and family programs, including programs for after school, holiday, and vacation time periods.

Public health GP CS Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

3.4C
Continue to promote the development of a new University of California, California State University, or private college or university campus within the city through outreach, marketing, and cooperation with other agencies and organizations.

GP CM Staff will continue coordination. Ongoing.

GOAL CH‐4:  AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Ensure that all residents have a safe, high‐ quality, and stable place to call home.

POLICY CH‐4.1
Attract and encourage residential development that offers a range of housing options to meet the needs and income constraints of allStockton residents.

Action CH‐

4.1A
Maintain a ratio of 30 percent multi‐family residential uses or higher in the citywide housing stock.

Air quality,
climate change
GP, HE CD, Housing, BLD Staff will continue to monitor annually and adjust accordingly. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

4.1B
Conduct a study to explore the feasibility of inclusionary housing requirements, in‐lieu fee levels, density bonus, modified fee structures, and/or tax incentives to promote the inclusion of a meaningful percentage of affordable units within market rate housing projects, and implement the feasible approaches identified in the study.

GP, HE CD, ED, H This effort began in 2020 and concluded in 2021. 2021 Action CH‐

4.1C
Explore the feasibility of developing an ordinance to allow “tiny homes” and container homes to serve as permanent housing.

Climate change GP, CAP, SMC CD This effort began in 2020 and concluded in 2021. 2021 Action CH‐

4.1D
Study and implement adjustments to the Public Facilities Fee structure, parking requirements, and other development standards to facilitate the development of secondary residential units and other smaller dwelling units that can serve as relatively affordable housing.

Air quality,
climate change
GP CD, ED PFF study to be completed in 2023. 2023
Attachment A
1169
26 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)  Action CH‐

4.1E
Ensure that affordable housing projects and project components meet health and safety requirements that are consistent with market rate housing during project application review and Ongoing. Code enforcement.

Public health, EJ CD, CD, H This will continue to be reviewed on an annual basis for reporting. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

4.1F
Provide assistance to developers seeking to build affordable housing in Stockton with preparing applications for regional, State, and/or federal funding assistance programs.

GP, , SMC,
Housing Fund
ED, H The annual NOFA provides funding for affordable housing developers in Stockton. The City currently provides information on incentives via the website at www.stocktonca.gov/housing. The City also assists affordable housing developers applying for regional, State, and/or federal funding.

Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐4.2
Support homeless members of the Stockton community with programs to improve quality of life.

EJ
Action CH‐

4.2A
Coordinate with local and regional agencies and community organizations to address the needs of homeless people, including shelter, food, clothing, health care, mental health, and transportation.

Public health, EJ GP H The City will continue its participation in the San Joaquin County Continuum of Care (SJCoC). The SJCoC, in partnership with the City of Stockton and the County of San Joaquin, developed the San Joaquin Community Response to Homelessness (“2020 San Joaquin County Strategic Plan”). The City Council adopted the Strategic Plan on July 14, 2020 and City staff continue to implement the goals and objectives.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

4.2B
Provide information about shelter and food assistance programs via the range of the City's communication tools.

Public health GP H Continue coordination. Ongoing.

Action CH‐

4.2C
Support programs to provide rental and homeownership assistance to low‐income people and families through outreach and other assistance.

Public health, EJ GP H Owner‐occupied rehab programs offer funding opportunities for low‐income property owners and is shared on the City’s website at
www.stocktonca.gov/housing.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

4.2D
Support programs to reduce homelessness through education, job training, and substance abuse counseling and rehabilitation through outreach and other assistance
Public health, EJ GP H The 2020‐2021 Annual Action Plan was amended to outline a number of projects and initiatives to reduce homelessness with $7M in Cares Act ESG funding, including $500,000 for Supplies, Equipment & Transportation; $2M for Homeless Encampment/Street Outreach; $1.5M for Expanded Shelter Homeless Services & Staffing; and $2.345M for a NOFA for rapid rehousing and homeless prevention assistance.

Ongoing.

GOAL CH‐5: SUSTAINABILITY LEADERSHIP: Exhibit leadership in sustainability for the Central Valley and beyond.

POLICY CH‐5.1
Accommodate a changing climate through adaptation, mitigation, and resiliency planning and projects.

Climate change
Action CH‐

5.1A
Upon the next revision of the City’s Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, conduct a comprehensive climate change vulnerability assessment to inform the development of adaptation and resilience policies and strategies, and incorporate them into the Safety Element, in accordance with SB 379.

Climate change GP, HMP CD, PD, Fire Staff will coordinate with service provides and effected departments (i.e. firs, police) to assess current plan and resources. No action to updated plan scheduled for 2022 unless directed by Council.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

5.1B
Maintain and implement the City of Stockton Climate Action Plan (CAP) and update the CAP to include the following:
■ Updated communitywide GHG emissions inventory;
■ 2030 GHG emissions reduction target, consistent with SB 32; ■ Estimated 2030 GHG emissions reduction benefits of State programs;■ Summary of the City’s progress toward the 2020 local GHG emissions reduction target;
■ New and/or revised GHG reduction strategies that, when quantified, achieve the 2030 reduction target and continue emission reductions beyond 2030; and■ New or updated implementation plan for the CAP.

Climate change GP, CAP CD City staff will inventory CAP policies and practices in 2021. This effort may require procurement and council direction and/or review.

Ongoing.

Attachment A
1170
27 Category  POLICY/ACTION  Action Topic1  Regulatory
Documents2
Action Lead 3  Possible Tools/Steps/Funding  STATUS Estimated Time of Completion Orange: (ED); Blue: (PW, Parks, MUD)  Action CH‐

5.1C
Accommodate a changing climate through adaptation and resiliency planning and projects.

Climate change GP, CAP, HMP CD, PW, Fire Staff will continue to work with SJCOG to monitor and incorporate CAP policies on adaption and resiliency and correspond to the city’s emergency and Hazard Mitigation Planning.
2021 and Ongoing.

POLICY CH‐5.2
Expand opportunities for recycling, re‐use of materials, and waste reduction.

Climate change
Action CH‐

5.2A
Use recycled materials and products for City projects and operations where economically feasible, and work with recycling contractors to encourage businesses to use recycled products in their manufacturing processes and encourage consumers to purchase recycled products Climate change GP PW Continue to provide information on the city’s website http://www.stocktongov.com/government/departments/publicWorks/garb. html
Ongoing.

Action CH‐

5.2B
Continue to require recycling in private and public operations, including construction/demolition debris.

Climate change GP PW, CD Continue to review refuse and recycling needs for new projects and permits.

When applicable, require installation and enough onsite services.

Ongoing.

Action CH‐

5.2C
Expand educational and outreach efforts to promote recycling by occupants of multi‐family housing, businesses, and schools.

Climate change  GP PW, CD Continue to utilize information of the city’s website to educate recycling efforts and standards.

Ongoing.

Attachment A
1171
Housing Element Annual Progress Report ‐ Summary
Jurisdiction Stockton
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Current Year
Deed Restricted 86
Non-Deed Restricted 0
Deed Restricted 75
Non-Deed Restricted 27
Deed Restricted 0
Non-Deed Restricted 6
694
888
Units by Structure Type Entitled Permitted Completed
SFA 0 0 0
SFD 0 526 412
2 to 4 0 4 0
5+ 0 329 74
ADU 0 29 21
MH 0 0 0
Total 0 888 507
59 2,466
1,517
0 0
0 0
0 Income Rental Ownership Total
Very Low 0 00
Low 0 00
Moderate 0 00
Above Moderate 0 00
Total 0 00
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
Income Level
Very Low
Low
Moderate
Above Moderate
Units Constructed - SB 35 Streamlining Permits
Number of Streamlining Applications Approved
Total Developments Approved with Streamlining
Total Units Constructed with Streamlining
Total Housing Applications Submitted:

Number of Proposed Units in All Applications Received:

Total Housing Units Approved:

Total Housing Units Disapproved:

Total Units
Housing Applications Summary
Use of SB 35 Streamlining Provisions
Note: Units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals Number of Applications for Streamlining
Building Permits Issued by Affordability Summary
1 Attachment B 1172
Housing Element Progress Report
Table A
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional fieldReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element ImplementationPlanning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023 Date
Application
Submitted
Total
Approved
Units by
Project
Total
Disapproved
Units by
Project
Streamlining Application Status Notes
2 34 6 7 8 9 11 12
Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Date Application Submitted+ (see instructions) Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low-Income Deed Restricted Low-Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Total PROPOSED Units by Project Total APPROVED Units by project Total DISAPPROVED Units by Project Was APPLICATION SUBMITTED Pursuant to GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Was a Density Bonus requested for this housing development? Was a Density Bonus approved for this housing development? Please indicate the status of the application. Notes+ Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 91 178 184 18 0 88 1907 2466 1517 0 06642014 6823 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 Westlake Village P20-0200 P20-0618 SFD O 1/20/2021 46 46 46 No No No Approved Master Plan Village C111727025 1604 N WILSON WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 Town Center Studios P20-0962 5+ R 1/29/2021 40 40 40 No Yes Yes Approved Phased Homekey project14906215 401 S EL DORADO ST, #C, STOCKTON, CA 95203 HASJC Sonora Square P20-0943 5+ R 2/3/2021 37 37 37 No Yes Yes Approved HASJC07067002 2902 W EIGHT MILE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95209 8-Mile House P20-0241 5+ R 3/2/2021 384 384 384 No No No Approved Site Plan Review - Two Phases06605059 6210 WESTLAKE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95219 Autumn Trails at Westlake Village P20-1001 SFD O 3/9/2021 112 112 112 No No No Approved Master Plan Village N13937001 228 N SUTTER ST, STOCKTON, CA 95202 Medici Artist Lofts P20-0903 5+ R 3/18/2021 27 7 34 34 No No No Approved Vertical Tentative Parcel Map12117025 2710 BRISTOL AV, STOCKTON, CA 95204 P18-0690 SFA R 4/2/2021 16 16 16 No No No Approved 8 Duplexes13906033 610 N HUNTER ST, STOCKTON, CA 95202 Hunter House P21-0287 P19-0294 5+ R 4/2/2021 120 120 120 No No No Approved Design change17118001 1845 E THIRTEENTH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 P19-0765 SFD O 4/7/2021 9 9 9 No No No Approved Revised Tentative Map - 9 SF lots09405008 1004 E SWAIN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95210 P19-0806 5+ R 4/7/2021 18 18 No No No Pending Pending resubmittal of site plan.15543035 2649 E MAIN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 P20-0254 2 to 4 R 4/7/2021 4 4 No No No Pending Pending resubmittal of site plan.13705006 645 W HARDING WY, STOCKTON, CA 95204 P20-0939 5+ R 4/7/2021 22 22 22 No No No Approved Office to MFR conversion11017009 1457 ROSE MARIE LN, STOCKTON, CA 95207 P20-0671 SFD O 4/13/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved Existing SFR lot split17513021 3442 MARY AV, STOCKTON, CA 95206 P20-0965 SFD O 4/13/2021 2 2 2 No No No Approved Existing SFR lot split16529012 2863 S VAN BUREN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 P20-0788 SFD O 4/26/2021 3 3 3 No No No Approved 1:3 lot split for SFR17304007 2955 JULIET RD, STOCKTON, CA 95205 Verona Estates P20-0614 SFD O 4/27/2021 23 23 23 No No No Approved Tentative map - 23 SF lots06605010 10131 SKYLINE BAY DR, STOCKTON, CA 95219 Westlake Village P20-1002 SFD O 4/28/2021 96 96 96 No No No Approved Master Plan Village L11530002 4204 ALVARADO AV, STOCKTON, CA 95204 Calaveras Estates Unit No. IV P21-0106 SFD O 4/28/2021 40 40 40 No No No Approved12708014 137 E HARDING WY, #C, STOCKTON, CA 95204 P20-0580 2 to 4 R 5/10/2021 3 3 3 No No No Approved Add 3 MFR DU to existing 7 MFR17127315 2313 NIGHTINGALE AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 P21-0016 SFD O 6/30/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved Existing SFR lot split12202032 3616 E EIGHT MILE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95212 Cannery Park P21-0435 P21-0569 SFD O 7/7/2021 321 321 No No No Pending Amend D.A. to shift Comm to 324 SFR DU + future MFR between 162-296 DU17953001 4302 ZACHARY DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Rose Creek P21-0406 SFD O 7/8/2021 38 38 38 No No No Approved Design Review07245028 9163 CONNIE AV, STOCKTON, CA 95209 P21-0450 SFD O 7/8/2021 3 3 No No No Pending 1:3 lot split for SFR07117002 10100 TRINITY PKWY 5TH FL STOCKTON, CA 95219 Atlas Tract/Delta Cove P21-0437 SFD O 7/9/2021 51 51 51 No No No Approved Tentative map extension06643001 6901 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 Westlake Village P20-0021 SFD O 7/21/2021 101 101 101 No No No Approved Master Plan Village C2 - Design Review06605009 10100 TRINITY PKWY 5TH FL STOCKTON, CA 95219 Westlake Village P21-0648 SFD O 8/10/2021 84 84 84 No No No Approved Master Plan Village M - Design Review14918015 47 N GRANT ST, STOCKTON, CA 95202 P21-0084 5+ R 9/1/2021 7 7 No No No Pending Office to MFR conversion16382015 1612 BELLA VISTA DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Aspire at River Terrace P21-0868 SFD O 9/3/2021 83 83 83 No No No Approved Design Review12708010 1610 N EL DORADO ST, STOCKTON, CA 95204 P21-0808 5+ R 9/9/2021 43 43 No No No Pending Office to MFR conversion12202051 10300 BONO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 Cannery Park P21-0764 SFD O 9/14/2021 73 73 73 No No No Approved Unit 6 - Design Review08404005 10789 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD, STOCKTON, CA 95209 Elderberry Senior Housing Project P21-0667
SFD O 9/28/2021 42 42 42 No No No Approved
Tentative map extension
16603005 4849 CAROLYN WESTON BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Asano P21-0999 SFD O 10/21/2021 212 212 No No No Pending Tentative map application and Williamson Act Cancellation13710211 615 W MAGNOLIA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 P21-0508 SFD O 11/3/2021 1 1 1 No No No Approved Design Review14918016 27 N GRANT ST, STOCKTON, CA 95202 P21-1102 SFA O 11/4/2021 1 1 No No No Pending Live/work Site Plan and Design Review17514038 55 CLAYTON AV, STOCKTON, CA 95206 P21-0051 SFD O 11/17/2021 2 2 No No No Pending 1:2 lot split for SFR16422014 3535 MANTHEY RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 P21-0080 5+ R 11/17/2021 32 32 No No No Pending Phased project - convert office to 8 DU, then construct 8 DU07061005 1240 HEAVENLY CI, STOCKTON, CA 95209 Elkhorn Club Estates 2 P21-1091 SFD O 11/18/2021 55 55 55 No No No Approved Master Plan - Design Review14906607 429 S SAN JOAQUIN ST, #B, STOCKTON, CA 95203 Gospel Center Transitional Housing P21-1188 5+ R 11/23/2021 178 178 No No No Pending New construction - transitional housing14926412 435 S GRANT ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 P21-1179 2 to 4 R 12/7/2021 2 2 No No No Pending Duplex07117005 9901 N INTERSTATE 5 W FR RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 Atlas Tract/Delta Cove P21-1098
SFD O 12/14/2021 0 No No No Pending
D.A.
08032006 8601 THORNTON RD, STOCKTON, CA 95209 Davis Crossing P21-1171 SFD O 12/14/2021 67 67 No No No Pending Tentative Map & Planned Development13718030 709 N CENTER ST, #2G, STOCKTON, CA 95202 HASJC Park Center P21-1284 5+ R 12/29/2021 51 51 No Yes Yes Pending HASJC12716209 436 E CLEVELAND ST, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-10152 ADU R 12/27/2021 1 1 No No No Pending 7944003 450 JILL CI, STOCKTON, CA 95210 BP21-06074 ADU R 12/7/2021 1 1 No No No Pending 12420032 9220 MAMMATH PEAK CI, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-06162 ADU R 12/3/2021 1 1 No No No Pending 9605012 4424 IJAMS RD, STOCKTON, CA 95210 BP21-08617 ADU R 12/6/2021 0 No No No Disapproved Resubmittal with building code corrections requested. 12428014 3429 CATHEDRAL CI, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-07359 ADU R 12/28/2021 0 No No No Pending16535058 2448 S LINCOLN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08966 ADU R 12/20/2021 0 No No No Pending16709101 2048 S SAN JOAQUIN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08633 ADU R 11/4/2021 1 1 No No No Pending13504136 1320 BUENA VISTA AV, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP21-07089 ADU R 10/4/2021 0 No No No Pending Illegal JADU conversion subject to Code Enforcement action. Resubmittal with building code corrections requested.11733019 1625 PINCHOT ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-09579 ADU R 12/23/2021 1 1 No No No Disapproved Illegal ADU conversion subject to Code Enforcement action. Resubmittal with building code corrections requested.11524217 564 E ESSEX ST, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-05573 ADU R 9/24/2021 1 1 No No No Disapproved Resubmittal with building code corrections requested.11518401 202 E DOWNS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-0888 ADU R 12/13/2021 1 1 No No No Disapproved Resubmittal with building code corrections requested.11822030 4301 GLENEAGLES CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 P21-1248 ADU R 12/20/2021 1 1 No No No Pending ADU within PURD, exceptions to setbacks of PURD recommended.12514026 21 E MONTEREY AV, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-09464 ADU R 12/2/2021 0 No No No Pending Response requested with clarifications. 8208043 3114 VALLEY FORGE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-06837 ADU R 9/23/2021 0 No No No Pending Resubmittal with building code corrections requested. 16712206 1729 S CALIFORNIA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-09062 ADU R 12/9/2021 0 No No No Pending Resubmittal with building code corrections requested.11723210 1703 HIAWATHA AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-09156 ADU R 12/14/2021 0 No No No Pending Resubmittal with building code corrections requested.13005021 3232 TRIDENT ST, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09400 ADU R 12/22/2021 0 No No No Pending Resubmittal with building code corrections requested.

Table A
Housing Development Applications Submitted
Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas
1 5
Project Identifier Unit Types Proposed Units - Affordability by Household Incomes (CCR Title 25 §6202)
Density Bonus Applications
10 1
Attachment B
1173
Housing Element Annual Report
Table A2
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Table A2
Annual Building Activity Report Summary - New Construction, Entitled, Permits and Completed Units Project
Identifier Streamlining Infill
Housing without Financial
Assistance or Deed
Restrictions
Term of Affordability
or Deed Restriction Notes
1 23 56 89 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Prior APN+ Current APN Street Address Project Name+ Local Jurisdiction Tracking ID+ Unit Category (SFA,SFD,2 to 4,5+,ADU,MH) Tenure R=Renter O=Owner Very
LowIncome
Deed
Restricte
d
Very
LowInco
me
Non
Deed
Restri
cted
LowIncom
e Deed
Restric
ted
LowIncom
e
Non
Deed
Restri
cted
ModerateIncome Deed
Restricted
ModerateIncome Non
Deed
Restricted
Above
ModerateIncome
Entitlement
Date Approved # of Units issued Entitlements Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Building Permits Date Issued # of Units Issued Building Permits Very Low- Income Deed Restricted Very Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Low- Income Deed Restricted Low- Income Non Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Deed Restricted Moderate- Income Non Deed Restricted Above Moderate- Income Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness (see instructions) Date Issued # of Units issued Certificates of Occupancy or other forms of readiness How many of the units were Extremely Low Income?+ Was Project APPROVED using GC 65913.4(b)? (SB 35 Streamlining) Y/N Infill Units? Y/N+ Assistance Programs for Each Development (may select multiple - see instructions) Deed Restriction Type (may select multiple - see instructions) For units affordable without financial assistance or deed restrictions, explain how the locality determined the units were affordable (see instructions) Term of Affordability or Deed Restriction (years) (if affordable in perpetuity enter 1000)+ Number of Demolished/Des troyed Units Demolished or Destroyed Units Demolished/De stroyed Units Owner or Renter Total Density Bonus Applied to the Project (Percentage Increase in Total Allowable Units or Total Maximum Allowable Residential Gross Floor Area) Number of Other Incentives, Concessions, Waivers, or Other Modifications Given to the Project (Excluding Parking Waivers or Parking Reductions)
List the incentives,
concessions,
waivers, and
modifications
(Excluding Parking
Waivers or Parking
Modifications)
Did the project receive a
reduction or waiver of
parking standards? (Y/N)
Notes+
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 0 75 27 0 6 694 888 80 0 0 15 0 0 412 507 00 00 17718042 1569 MICHAEL AV, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-08765 SFD O 0 0 1 1/5/2021 1N06644011 6941 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03240 SFD O 0 0 1 1/5/2021 1N06641054 6723 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08804 SFD O 0 0 1 1/7/2021 1N06641008 6702 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08789 SFD O 0 0 1 1/11/2021 1N06642015 10920 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03985 SFD O 0 0 1 1/11/2021 1N06642047 10936 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04180 SFD O 0 0 1 1/11/2021 1N16378060 1668 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09174 SFD O 0 0 1 1/12/2021 1N15716048 964 S BROADWAY AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP19-07882 SFD O 0 0 1 1/13/2021 1N06643041 10942 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03238 SFD O 0 0 1 1/13/2021 1N06641006 6710 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-06322 SFD O 0 0 1 1/14/2021 1N06641009 10900 PORTSIDE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08790 SFD O 0 0 1 1/14/2021 1N06642046 10932 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04179 SFD O 0 0 1 1/14/2021 1N06642049 10944 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04182 SFD O 0 0 1 1/14/2021 1N 06641049 6703 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08797 SFD O 0 0 1 1/19/2021 1N 06641050 6707 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08799 SFD O 0 0 1 1/21/2021 1N 17742024 1933 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04389 SFD O 0 0 1 1/21/2021 1N 16379061 1710 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09114 SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2021 1N 16378057 1655 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09117 SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2021 1N 16378056 1649 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09176 SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2021 1N 16378055 1643 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09177 SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2021 1N 06642048 10940 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04181 SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2021 1N 17742025 1925 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04391 SFD O 0 0 1 1/22/2021 1N 16378061 1660 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09172 SFD O 0 0 1 1/25/2021 1N 06642050 10948 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04183 SFD O 0 0 1 1/25/2021 1N 06642051 10952 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04184 SFD O 0 0 1 1/25/2021 1N 16379060 1718 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09136 SFD O 0 0 1 1/26/2021 1N 06641003 6722 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08564 SFD O 0 0 1 1/27/2021 1N 16378059 1702 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09096 SFD O 0 0 1 1/27/2021 1N06644010 6945 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03270 SFD O 0 0 1 1/28/2021 1N06641002 6726 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08786 SFD O 0 0 1 2/2/2021 1N16827002 4707 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03857 SFD O 0 0 1 2/2/2021 1N16378058 1703 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09103 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2021 1N16378051 1619 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09146 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2021 1N16378052 1625 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09158 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2021 1N06644024 6944 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03271 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2021 1N16827013 4772 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03848 SFD O 0 0 1 2/3/2021 1 N 17513055 3444 ODELL AV, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09212 SFD O 0 0 1 2/4/2021 1 N 17742026 1917 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04393 SFD O 0 0 1 2/5/2021 1N 17742027 1909 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04396 SFD O 0 0 1 2/5/2021 1N 17742028 1901 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04397 SFD O 0 0 1 2/5/2021 1 N 16518306 436 ST FRANCIS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-08885 SFD O 0 0 1 2/9/2021 1N 16827017 4740 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03844 SFD O 0 0 1 2/9/2021 1N 16827016 4748 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03845 SFD O 0 0 1 2/9/2021 1 N 16827015 4756 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03846 SFD O 0 0 1 2/9/2021 1 N 16528026 2727 S LINCOLN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-06192 SFD O 0 0 1 2/10/2021 1 N 16828009 4774 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03833 SFD O 0 0 1 2/10/2021 1 N16828008 4766 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03835 SFD O 0 0 1 2/10/2021 1 N16828007 4758 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03836 SFD O 0 0 1 2/10/2021 1 N06641001 6802 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08554 SFD O 0 0 1 2/11/2021 1 N 16378026 1443 HEATHWICK DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09122 SFD O 0 0 1 2/11/2021 1 N16828006 4750 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03837 SFD O 0 0 1 2/17/2021 1 N16828005 4742 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03838 SFD O 0 0 1 2/17/2021 1 N16828004 4734 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03839 SFD O 0 0 1 2/17/2021 1 N16827019 4724 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03842 SFD O 0 0 1 2/17/2021 1N 16827018 4732 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-03843 SFD O 0 0 1 2/17/2021 1N 06641007 6706 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08787 SFD O 0 0 1 2/18/2021 1N 07064006 1318 HEAVENLY CI, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP19-08984 SFD O 0 0 1 2/18/2021 1N 06643050 10939 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03908 SFD O 0 0 1 2/18/2021 1N 06644023 6948 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03910 SFD O 0 0 1 2/18/2021 1N 06643051 10943 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03258 SFD O 0 0 1 2/19/2021 1N 16379059 1726 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09125 SFD O 0 0 1 2/22/2021 1N 16378062 1652 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09151 SFD O 0 0 1 2/22/2021 1N 16379058 1734 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09180 SFD O 0 0 1 2/22/2021 1N16379062 1709 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09133 SFD O 0 0 1 2/24/2021 1N 16379063 1715 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09144 SFD O 0 0 1 2/24/2021 1N06643049 10935 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03907 SFD O 0 0 1 2/24/2021 1N 16828003 4726 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04876 SFD O 0 0 1 2/24/2021 1N 16828002 4718 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04877 SFD O 0 0 1 2/24/2021 1N 16828001 4710 EMERALD WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04878 SFD O 0 0 1 2/24/2021 1N16827021 4708 LISETTE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04879 SFD O 0 0 1 2/24/2021 1 N 06644009 6949 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-03909 SFD O 0 0 1 2/25/2021 1 N 16722024 2212 PERALTA AV, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-08883 SFD O 0 0 1 3/2/2021 1 N 16722053 2060 PERALTA AV, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-08884 SFD O 0 0 1 3/2/2021 1 N 16531050 2642 S MADISON ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-08887 SFD O 0 0 1 3/2/2021 1 N 16379065 1727 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09182 SFD O 0 0 1 3/2/2021 1 N 16379064 1721 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09183 SFD O 0 0 1 3/2/2021 1 N 07064010 1282 HEAVENLY CI, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP19-08986 SFD O 0 0 1 3/4/2021 1 N 06644022 6952 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04891 SFD O 0 0 1 3/4/2021 1N 07062013 10893 ST MORITZ CI, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP19-08983 SFD O 0 0 1 3/9/2021 1N 15127207 419 S AIRPORT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP19-09306 SFD O 0 0 1 3/9/2021 1N 16379056 1750 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09184 SFD O 0 0 1 3/16/2021 1N 06644008 6953 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04889 SFD O 0 0 1 3/16/2021 1N 16828012 4769 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04874 SFD O 0 0 1 3/17/2021 1 N 16828028 4776 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04858 SFD O 0 0 1 3/18/2021 1 N16828013 4761 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04873 SFD O 0 0 1 3/18/2021 1 N16379067 1739 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09185 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2021 1 N16379066 1733 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09186 SFD O 0 0 1 3/23/2021 1 N07064016 1246 HEAVENLY CI, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP19-08987 SFD O 0 0 1 3/25/2021 1 N16828027 4768 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04860 SFD O 0 0 1 3/25/2021 1 N16828026 4760 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04861 SFD O 0 0 1 3/25/2021 1 N16828015 4745 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04871 SFD O 0 0 1 3/25/2021 1 N16828014 4753 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04872 SFD O 0 0 1 3/25/2021 1 N06644007 6957 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04888 SFD O 0 0 1 3/29/2021 1N 06643043 10934 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04883 SFD O 0 0 1 3/30/2021 1N 16379068 1745 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09190 SFD O 0 0 1 4/1/2021 1 N 16828025 4752 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04862 SFD O 0 0 1 4/1/2021 1N 16828016 4737 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04870 SFD O 0 0 1 4/1/2021 1N16828023 4738 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04863 SFD O 0 0 1 4/2/2021 1N 06643044 10930 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04884 SFD O 0 0 1 4/6/2021 1N 16828021 4722 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04865 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2021 1N 16828019 4713 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04867 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2021 1N16828018 4721 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04868 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2021 1N 16828017 4729 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04869 SFD O 0 0 1 4/12/2021 1 N 17742019 1973 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06362 SFD O 0 0 1 4/15/2021 1 N17742020 1965 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06365 SFD O 0 0 1 4/15/2021 1 N17742021 1957 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06371 SFD O 0 0 1 4/16/2021 1 N17742022 1949 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06373 SFD O 0 0 1 4/16/2021 1 N06644021 6956 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04890 SFD O 0 0 1 4/19/2021 1 N17742023 1941 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06374 SFD O 0 0 1 4/19/2021 1 N16379069 1751 CAMEO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09189 SFD O 0 0 1 4/20/2021 1 N 16828020 4714 DELANEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04866 SFD O 0 0 1 4/20/2021 1 N 16826030 615 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04880 SFD O 0 0 1 4/20/2021 1 N16826031 621 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04881 SFD O 0 0 1 4/20/2021 1 N06642087 10933 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06233 SFD O 0 0 1 4/20/2021 1 N 16379057 1742 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09181 SFD O 0 0 1 4/21/2021 1 N06644006 6961 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04887 SFD O 0 0 1 4/26/2021 1 N16826025 640 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05673 SFD O 0 0 1 4/27/2021 1 N16826026 634 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05674 SFD O 0 0 1 4/27/2021 1 N16826033 633 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05692 SFD O 0 0 1 4/27/2021 1 N06642085 10941 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06231 SFD O 0 0 1 4/27/2021 1 N 16826032 627 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04882 SFD O 0 0 1 4/29/2021 1 N16826034 639 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05693 SFD O 0 0 1 4/29/2021 1 N12217017 3001 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06055 SFD O 0 0 1 4/29/2021 1 N 06642083 10949 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06178 SFD O 0 0 1 4/29/2021 1 N 12218005 3193 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06819 SFD O 0 0 1 4/29/2021 1 N 16826014 632 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05660 SFD O 0 0 1 5/4/2021 1 N 16826016 644 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05670 SFD O 0 0 1 5/4/2021 1 N 06644005 10963 HUMMOCK ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04886 SFD O 0 0 1 5/6/2021 1 N 12217013 10211 CLAPTON LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06052 SFD O 0 0 1 5/10/2021 1 N 16826028 622 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05684 SFD O 0 0 1 5/11/2021 1 N16826029 616 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05686 SFD O 0 0 1 5/11/2021 1 N06642086 10937 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06867 SFD O 0 0 1 5/11/2021 1 N 06644004 10959 HUMMOCK ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-04885 SFD O 0 0 1 5/12/2021 1 N16530605 2621 S MADISON ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05589 SFD O 0 0 1 5/12/2021 1 N 12217015 10235 CLAPTON LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06319 SFD O 0 0 1 5/12/2021 1 N 16826012 620 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05658 SFD O 0 0 1 5/13/2021 1 N 16826013 626 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05659 SFD O 0 0 1 5/13/2021 1 N06644003 10955 HUMMOCK ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06067 SFD O 0 0 1 5/14/2021 1 N06642084 10945 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06179 SFD O 0 0 1 5/14/2021 1 N 12217014 10223 CLAPTON LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06054 SFD O 0 0 1 5/17/2021 1 N 06642033 10925 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06323 SFD O 0 0 1 5/18/2021 1 N 16826035 707 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05694 SFD O 0 0 1 5/19/2021 1 N16826036 713 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05695 SFD O 0 0 1 5/19/2021 1 N16826037 719 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05696 SFD O 0 0 1 5/19/2021 1 N16825036 725 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05700 SFD O 0 0 1 5/19/2021 1 N12217077 10212 CLAPTON LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06058 SFD O 0 0 1 5/20/2021 1 N 06642082 10953 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06177 SFD O 0 0 1 5/20/2021 1 N 06645035 6766 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07761 SFD O 0 0 1 5/20/2021 1 N06645036 6770 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07762 SFD O 0 0 1 5/20/2021 1 N06645037 6767 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07763 SFD O 0 0 1 5/20/2021 1 N06645038 6761 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07764 SFD O 0 0 1 5/20/2021 1 N06642035 10917 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06325 SFD O 0 0 1 5/24/2021 1 N 06645039 6753 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07765 SFD O 0 0 1 5/24/2021 1 N16709103 331 E SEVENTH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-00328 SFD O 0 0 1 5/25/2021 1 N 06645040 6747 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07766 SFD O 0 0 1 5/25/2021 1 N15516016 1827 MILTON ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP18-06139 SFD O 0 0 1 5/26/2021 1 N16825038 737 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05703 SFD O 0 0 1 5/26/2021 1 N16825039 743 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05704 SFD O 0 0 1 5/26/2021 1 N16825040 749 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05706 SFD O 0 0 1 5/26/2021 1 N06644002 10951 HUMMOCK ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06065 SFD O 0 0 1 5/26/2021 1 N12217076 10200 CLAPTON LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06057 SFD O 0 0 1 5/27/2021 1 N 12218007 3194 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06823 SFD O 0 0 1 5/27/2021 1 N 06645033 6754 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07759 SFD O 0 0 1 5/27/2021 1 N06644001 10947 HUMMOCK ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06064 SFD O 0 0 1 6/1/2021 1 N 06642052 10956 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06857 SFD O 0 0 1 6/1/2021 1 N 16825042 761 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05708 SFD O 0 0 1 6/2/2021 1 N 06645034 6760 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07760 SFD O 0 0 1 6/2/2021 1 N 08410002 10730 MONTROUGE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP17-07495 SFD O 0 0 1 6/3/2021 1 N 16826023 702 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05671 SFD O 0 0 1 6/7/2021 1 N 16825041 755 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05707 SFD O 0 0 1 6/7/2021 1 N 16825043 767 SANDSTONE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05710 SFD O 0 0 1 6/7/2021 1 N 06642032 10929 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06070 SFD O 0 0 1 6/9/2021 1 N 06642053 10960 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06858 SFD O 0 0 1 6/9/2021 1 N 12217016 10247 CLAPTON LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07570 SFD O 0 0 1 6/9/2021 1 N 12218006 3197 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-06820 SFD O 0 0 1 6/10/2021 1 N 06645032 6750 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07758 SFD O 0 0 1 6/10/2021 1 N06642054 6815 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06860 SFD O 0 1 1/20/2021 1 1 6/11/2021 1 N 06642012 10908 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-02576 SFD O 0 0 1 6/14/2021 1 N 06645031 6746 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07757 SFD O 0 0 1 6/14/2021 1 N12217018 3013 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-08158 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 1 6/14/2021 1 N 12217019 3025 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07769 SFD O 0 0 1 6/15/2021 1 N 06643048 10931 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06063 SFD O 0 0 1 6/16/2021 1 N 16826022 708 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06620 SFD O 0 0 1 6/16/2021 1 N16379054 1766 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09193 SFD O 0 0 1 6/22/2021 1 N06643053 6958 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07055 SFD O 0 0 1 6/24/2021 1 N06645030 6742 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08430 SFD O 0 0 1 6/24/2021 1 N 16826018 706 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06601 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N16826019 712 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06602 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N16826020 718 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06603 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N16825033 732 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06616 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N16825034 726 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06617 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N16825035 720 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06618 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N16826021 714 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06619 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N12218002 3173 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07770 SFD O 0 0 1 6/28/2021 1 N 06642043 10920 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06330 SFD O 0 0 1 6/29/2021 1 N 06642039 10904 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06881 SFD O 0 0 1 6/29/2021 1 N 06642041 10912 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06886 SFD O 0 0 1 6/29/2021 1 N 12218003 3181 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07571 SFD O 0 0 1 6/29/2021 1 N 06645029 6740 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08427 SFD O 0 0 1 6/29/2021 1 N06643052 6954 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07053 SFD O 0 0 1 6/30/2021 1 N12218004 3189 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07572 SFD O 0 0 1 7/1/2021 1 N 06645041 6741 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08431 SFD O 0 0 1 7/6/2021 1 N 16825020 724 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06604 SFD O 0 0 1 7/8/2021 1 N 16825021 730 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06605 SFD O 0 0 1 7/8/2021 1 N 16825022 736 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06606 SFD O 0 0 1 7/8/2021 1 N 16825032 738 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06615 SFD O 0 0 1 7/8/2021 1 N 06644048 6953 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07062 SFD O 0 0 1 7/8/2021 1 N 06645028 6734 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08426 SFD O 0 0 1 7/9/2021 1 N 12218009 3182 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07573 SFD O 0 0 1 7/12/2021 1 N 12218010 3174 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07771 SFD O 0 0 1 7/12/2021 1 N 12218011 3162 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-08160 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 1 7/12/2021 1 N 16825023 742 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06607 SFD O 0 0 1 7/13/2021 1 N 16825024 748 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06608 SFD O 0 0 1 7/13/2021 1 N16825030 750 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06613 SFD O 0 0 1 7/13/2021 1 N16825031 744 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06614 SFD O 0 0 1 7/13/2021 1 N06645043 6731 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08434 SFD O 0 0 1 7/15/2021 1 N06644047 6949 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07061 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2021 1 N06645042 6735 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08432 SFD O 0 0 1 7/19/2021 1 N16825025 754 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06609 SFD O 0 0 1 7/20/2021 1 N16825026 760 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06610 SFD O 0 0 1 7/20/2021 1 N16825028 762 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06611 SFD O 0 0 1 7/20/2021 1 N16825029 756 TOPAZ RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06612 SFD O 0 0 1 7/20/2021 1 N12218012 3150 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-08161 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 1 7/20/2021 1 N 12217029 3138 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-08454 SFD O 0 0 1 7/20/2021 1 N 06642055 6819 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06861 SFD O 0 0 1 7/22/2021 1 N06642080 10946 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00058 SFD O 0 0 1 7/22/2021 1 N 06642079 10942 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00057 SFD O 0 0 1 7/23/2021 1 N 06642081 10950 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00059 SFD O 0 0 1 7/27/2021 1 N Unit Types Affordability by Household Incomes - Completed Entitlement Affordability by Household Incomes - Building Permits Affordability by Household Incomes - Certificates of Occupancy Density Bonus 4 7 10
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
Housing with Financial Assistance
and/or Deed Restrictions Demolished/Destroyed Units
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
1 Attachment B
1174
Housing Element Annual Report
Table A2
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
16827001 4734 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07208 SFD O 0 0 1 7/28/2021 1 N 16825002 4716 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07210 SFD O 0 0 1 7/28/2021 1 N16825027 766 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07226 SFD O 0 0 1 7/28/2021 1 N11748036 2013 GAVIN CT, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-01818 SFD O 0 0 1 7/28/2021 1 N11748037 2037 GAVIN CT, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-01819 SFD O 0 0 1 7/28/2021 1 N06641067 10926 SHADOWPORT CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP19-08785 SFD O 0 0 1 7/29/2021 1 N 06642034 10921 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06075 SFD O 0 0 1 7/29/2021 1 N 16379010 1659 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06940 SFD O 0 0 1 7/29/2021 1 N06644045 6941 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07058 SFD O 0 0 1 8/2/2021 1 N 06645027 6730 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08425 SFD O 0 0 1 8/2/2021 1 N 06645044 6725 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08435 SFD O 0 0 1 8/2/2021 1 N 06642036 10913 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06327 SFD O 0 0 1 8/4/2021 1 N 17742016 1982 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07698 SFD O 0 0 1 8/5/2021 1 N 17742018 1981 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07701 SFD O 0 0 1 8/5/2021 1 N 06645023 6706 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08420 SFD O 0 0 1 8/5/2021 1 N 06645024 6712 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08421 SFD O 0 0 1 8/5/2021 1 N 16825004 4636 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07213 SFD O 0 0 1 8/6/2021 1 N 06645025 6718 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08422 SFD O 0 0 1 8/6/2021 1 N 06642056 6823 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06863 SFD O 0 0 1 8/11/2021 1 N 06643047 10927 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07052 SFD O 0 0 1 8/11/2021 1 N 06644046 6945 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07060 SFD O 0 0 1 8/11/2021 1 N06642045 10928 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06332 SFD O 0 0 1 8/12/2021 1 N 06642057 6827 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06865 SFD O 0 0 1 8/12/2021 1 N16378002 1641 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06943 SFD O 0 0 1 8/12/2021 1 N12217030 3126 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-08455 SFD O 0 0 1 8/12/2021 1 N 06645046 6713 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00523 SFD O 0 0 1 8/12/2021 1 N 16379011 1653 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06941 SFD O 0 0 1 8/16/2021 1 N16378001 1647 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06942 SFD O 0 0 1 8/16/2021 1 N06645026 6724 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08424 SFD O 0 0 1 8/16/2021 1 N06645045 6719 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08436 SFD O 0 0 1 8/16/2021 1 N06645047 6707 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00524 SFD O 0 0 1 8/16/2021 1 N16825003 4704 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07212 SFD O 0 0 1 8/17/2021 1 N16825005 4628 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07215 SFD O 0 0 1 8/17/2021 1 N16825006 4620 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07216 SFD O 0 0 1 8/17/2021 1 N12217078 10224 CLAPTON LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-07772 SFD O 0 0 1 8/17/2021 1 N 12217025 3113 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00275 SFD O 0 0 1 8/17/2021 1 N 16825001 4728 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07209 SFD O 0 0 1 8/18/2021 1 N16825008 794 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07220 SFD O 0 0 1 8/18/2021 1 N16825009 788 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07222 SFD O 0 0 1 8/18/2021 1 N16825010 782 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07224 SFD O 0 0 1 8/18/2021 1 N06644044 6937 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07056 SFD O 0 0 1 8/19/2021 1 N17742015 1974 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07696 SFD O 0 0 1 8/19/2021 1 N17742017 1989 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07700 SFD O 0 0 1 8/19/2021 1 N16825013 764 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08205 SFD O 0 0 1 8/19/2021 1 N17742014 1966 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07695 SFD O 0 0 1 8/20/2021 1 N06645020 10804 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00519 SFD O 0 0 1 8/20/2021 1 N 06645021 10800 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00521 SFD O 0 0 1 8/20/2021 1 N 06645022 6700 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00522 SFD O 0 0 1 8/20/2021 1 N06645019 10808 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00518 SFD O 0 0 1 8/24/2021 1 N 06644043 6933 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07258 SFD O 0 0 1 8/26/2021 1 N16825011 776 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08203 SFD O 0 0 1 8/26/2021 1 N 06642076 10930 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00756 SFD O 0 0 1 8/26/2021 1 N 06645017 10816 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00515 SFD O 0 0 1 8/30/2021 1 N 16703508 1735 S SAN JOAQUIN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-01521 SFD O 0 0 1 8/30/2021 1 N12217024 3101 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00273 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 12217026 3125 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00276 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 12217028 3149 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00277 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 12217031 3114 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00278 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 12217020 3037 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00959 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 12217021 3051 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00960 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 12217022 3073 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00961 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 12217023 3089 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00962 SFD O 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N 06644042 6929 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07257 SFD O 0 0 1 9/2/2021 1 N 16825017 740 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08209 SFD O 0 0 1 9/2/2021 1 N 16825018 734 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08210 SFD O 0 0 1 9/2/2021 1 N 16825019 728 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08211 SFD O 0 0 1 9/2/2021 1 N 06645014 10828 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00512 SFD O 0 0 1 9/2/2021 1 N 06645015 10824 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00513 SFD O 0 0 1 9/2/2021 1 N 06642044 10924 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06078 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 06642042 10916 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06328 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 06642037 10909 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06880 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16378003 1635 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06944 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16378004 1629 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06945 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16378005 1623 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06946 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16380008 1506 LA VITA DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06955 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16825012 770 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08204 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16825014 758 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08206 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16825015 752 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08207 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 16825016 746 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08208 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 06645016 10820 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00514 SFD O 0 0 1 9/3/2021 1 N 06643046 10923 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07256 SFD O 0 0 1 9/9/2021 1 N 06643045 10926 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07255 SFD O 0 0 1 9/13/2021 1 N 06642031 10926 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07652 SFD O 0 0 1 9/14/2021 1 N 06645018 10812 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00516 SFD O 0 0 1 9/14/2021 1 N 06645048 6706 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01356 SFD O 0 0 1 9/16/2021 1 N 12217032 10238 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-01908 SFD O 0 0 1 9/20/2021 1 N12217033 10226 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-01909 SFD O 0 0 1 9/20/2021 1 N12217080 10225 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-02152 SFD O 0 0 1 9/21/2021 1 N12217034 10214 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-01910 SFD O 0 0 1 9/22/2021 1 N06645049 6710 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01357 SFD O 0 0 1 9/23/2021 1 N 06645050 6714 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01358 SFD O 0 0 1 9/23/2021 1 N 06645051 6718 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01366 SFD O 0 0 1 9/23/2021 1 N 06645052 6722 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01367 SFD O 0 0 1 9/23/2021 1 N 06645053 6726 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01368 SFD O 0 0 1 9/23/2021 1 N 06645067 10825 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01375 SFD O 0 0 1 9/23/2021 1 N 06645054 6730 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01370 SFD O 0 0 1 9/28/2021 1 N 06645055 6734 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01372 SFD O 0 0 1 9/28/2021 1 N 06645056 6738 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01373 SFD O 0 0 1 9/28/2021 1 N 06642040 10908 MIKAS POND WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06884 SFD O 0 0 1 9/29/2021 1 N 06642018 10925 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07650 SFD O 0 0 1 9/29/2021 1 N 06642019 10921 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07651 SFD O 0 0 1 9/29/2021 1 N 06644027 6932 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07391 SFD O 0 0 1 9/30/2021 1 N 06642028 10914 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07855 SFD O 0 0 1 10/1/2021 1 N 06644012 6937 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07389 SFD O 0 0 1 10/4/2021 1 N 17742013 1958 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07621 SFD O 0 0 1 10/4/2021 1 N 06645057 6742 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01374 SFD O 0 0 1 10/6/2021 1 N 06642020 10917 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07854 SFD O 0 0 1 10/7/2021 1 N 06644013 6933 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07390 SFD O 0 0 1 10/12/2021 1 N17742012 1950 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07618 SFD O 0 0 1 10/12/2021 1 N 06643014 10909 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07387 SFD O 0 0 1 10/18/2021 1 N 06642058 6831 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00753 SFD O 0 0 1 10/19/2021 1 N 16378006 1617 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06947 SFD O 0 0 1 10/26/2021 1 N 16378007 1611 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06948 SFD O 0 0 1 10/26/2021 1 N 16378013 1636 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06953 SFD O 0 0 1 10/27/2021 1 N 16378014 1642 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06954 SFD O 0 0 1 10/27/2021 1 N 06643015 10913 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07388 SFD O 0 0 1 10/27/2021 1 N 06645068 10824 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02188 SFD O 0 0 1 10/27/2021 1 N 06642021 10913 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00416 SFD O 0 0 1 11/1/2021 1 N 06644014 6929 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08253 SFD O 0 0 1 11/2/2021 1 N 06644028 6928 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08254 SFD O 0 0 1 11/8/2021 1 N 12217082 10201 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03139 SFD O 0 0 1 11/8/2021 1 N 08424023 36 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03267 SFD O 0 0 1 11/9/2021 1 N 08424024 48 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03268 SFD O 0 0 1 11/9/2021 1 N 08424026 72 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03270 SFD O 0 0 1 11/9/2021 1 N 06642030 10922 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00418 SFD O 0 0 1 11/10/2021 1 N 06642059 10957 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01620 SFD O 0 0 1 11/10/2021 1 N 06642062 10945 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01640 SFD O 0 0 1 11/12/2021 1 N 06645069 10828 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02189 SFD O 0 0 1 11/12/2021 1 N 06645072 10827 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02192 SFD O 0 0 1 11/15/2021 1 N 08424025 60 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03269 SFD O 0 0 1 11/15/2021 1 N 08424021 12 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03770 SFD O 0 0 1 11/15/2021 1 N 14109044 1798 E FLORA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP19-07505 SFD O 0 0 1 11/16/2021 1 N 06645073 10823 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02193 SFD O 0 0 1 11/17/2021 1 N 17743002 1968 OLD OAK DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02061 SFD O 0 0 1 11/18/2021 1 N 17743003 1960 OLD OAK DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02062 SFD O 0 0 1 11/18/2021 1 N 06645070 10832 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02190 SFD O 0 0 1 11/18/2021 1 N 06645071 10831 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02191 SFD O 0 0 1 11/18/2021 1 N 16378009 1612 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06949 SFD O 0 0 1 11/22/2021 1 N 16378010 1618 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06950 SFD O 0 0 1 11/22/2021 1 N 16378011 1624 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06951 SFD O 0 0 1 11/22/2021 1 N 16378012 1630 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06952 SFD O 0 0 1 11/22/2021 1 N 12217035 10202 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03137 SFD O 0 0 1 11/22/2021 1 N 08424019 10808 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03768 SFD O 0 0 1 11/23/2021 1 N 08424022 24 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03771 SFD O 0 0 1 11/23/2021 1 N 06642061 10949 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01639 SFD O 0 0 1 11/29/2021 1 N 06645012 10836 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02185 SFD O 0 0 1 11/29/2021 1 N06643016 10917 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08249 SFD O 0 0 1 11/30/2021 1 N 06642060 10953 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01621 SFD O 0 0 1 11/30/2021 1 N 06645013 10832 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02186 SFD O 0 0 1 11/30/2021 1 N06642025 10902 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08228 SFD O 0 0 1 12/1/2021 1 N 06642063 10941 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01641 SFD O 0 0 1 12/1/2021 1 N 08026002 9405 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-01302 SFD O 0 0 1 12/2/2021 1 N 08026002 9410 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02236 SFD O 0 0 1 12/2/2021 1 N 08026002 9410 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02236 SFD O 0 0 1 12/2/2021 1 N 06643018 10925 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00944 SFD O 0 0 1 12/6/2021 1 N 16718220 1544 SIKH TEMPLE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05716 SFD O 0 0 1 12/7/2021 1 N 06643020 10933 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00945 SFD O 0 0 1 12/9/2021 1 N 06645065 10833 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02187 SFD O 0 0 1 12/9/2021 1 N 06643019 10929 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00951 SFD O 0 0 1 12/10/2021 1 N 17743001 2977 S B ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02056 SFD O 0 0 1 12/10/2021 1 N 06645010 10844 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02183 SFD O 0 0 1 12/10/2021 1 N06645011 10840 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02184 SFD O 0 0 1 12/10/2021 1 N 06642064 10937 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01642 SFD O 0 0 1 12/16/2021 1 N 06644029 6924 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00948 SFD O 0 0 1 12/20/2021 1 N 16314050 2039 S YOSEMITE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-01585 SFD O 0 0 1 12/20/2021 1 N 06642004 6818 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00581 SFD O 0 0 1 12/21/2021 1 N 06642026 10906 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08229 SFD O 0 0 1 12/22/2021 1 N 06642065 10933 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01643 SFD O 0 0 1 12/22/2021 1 N06642066 10929 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01645 SFD O 0 0 1 12/22/2021 1 N 16381035 1419 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03408 SFD O 0 0 1 12/22/2021 1 N 16381034 1411 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03409 SFD O 0 0 1 12/22/2021 1 N 06642011 10904 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-02575 SFD O 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N 15311331 2080 MYRTLE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP20-06795 SFD O 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N 17744013 3061 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02583 SFD O 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N 17744015 3035 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02584 SFD O 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N 17744016 3017 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02586 SFD O 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N 17744012 3073 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02928 SFD O 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N 17744014 3049 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02929 SFD O 0 0 1 12/23/2021 1 N 06642002 6810 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00415 SFD O 0 0 1 12/27/2021 1 N 16314049 2051 S YOSEMITE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-01583 SFD O 0 0 1 12/27/2021 1 N16381061 1412 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03305 SFD O 0 0 1 12/27/2021 1 N 16381060 1418 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03411 SFD O 0 0 1 12/27/2021 1 N 06642008 6834 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00585 SFD O 0 0 1 12/28/2021 1 N 16379055 1758 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09187 SFD O 0 0 1 12/30/2021 1 N 16508025 62 W FIFTH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07922 ADU R 0 1 4/1/2021 1 1 4/1/2021 1 N Rents 16538002 1628 TURNPIKE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Turnpike Commons BP20-02668 ADU R 0 01 8/18/2021 1 N HEAP Other 55 16538004 1618 TURNPIKE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Turnpike Commons BP20-02672 ADU R 0 01 8/18/2021 1 N HEAP Other 55 16538005 1612 TURNPIKE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Turnpike Commons BP20-02674 ADU R 0 01 8/18/2021 1 N HEAP Other 55 13323031 1207 CARLTON AV, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP20-02832 ADU R 0 0 1 11/12/2021 1 N Rents 16709204 336 E SEVENTH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05637 ADU R 0 0 1 12/6/2021 1 N Rents13517101 1461 W WALNUT ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP21-03555 ADU R 0 0 1 12/16/2021 1 N Rents 11017009 1457 ROSE MARIE LN, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP20-02264 ADU R 0 0 1 2/4/2021 1 N Rents15709018 424 BURKETT AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04771 ADU R 0 1 11/18/2021 1 0N 11507314 143 W KNOLES WY, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP20-01612 ADU R 0 1 3/2/2021 1 0N 13505022 1739 MONTE DIABLO AV, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP20-03983 ADU R 0 0 1 6/15/2021 1 N Rents 16719109 1655 SIKH TEMPLE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04058 ADU R 0 1 11/9/2021 1 0N Rents15529010 2154 E SCOTTS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP20-05378 ADU R 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N Rents 7541011 8304 CRUDEN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP19-01838 ADU R 0 0 1 1/6/2021 1 N Rents 10423018 4703 TANGLEWOOD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP20-03870 ADU R 0 0 1 3/29/2021 1 N Rents 15320616 2371 E MARSH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05048 ADU R 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N Rents 13319016 2174 MONTE DIABLO AV, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP19-09024 ADU R 0 0 1 1/20/2021 1 N Rents 11663058 3810 CONDOR CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04685 ADU R 0 1 10/27/2021 1 0N Rents 13903034 1107 N SAN JOAQUIN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95202 BP21-08586 ADU R 0 1 11/16/2021 1 0N Rents 17716402 3009 VOLNEY ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09036 ADU R 0 1 10/28/2021 1 0N Rents 12712012 343 E CLEVELAND ST, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP20-06679 ADU R 0 1 3/15/2021 1 1 6/23/2021 1 N Rents16523010 2483 S COMMERCE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05685 ADU R 0 1 1/4/2021 1 1 6/21/2021 1 N Rents 16310023 1114 LEVER BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-01986 ADU R 0 1 3/11/2021 1 0N Rents 14120507 2334 E POPLAR ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-01146 ADU R 0 0 1 8/31/2021 1 N Rents 16538003 1624 TURNPIKE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Turnpike Commons BP20-02670 ADU R 01 11/9/2020 1 1 9/18/2021 1 N HEAP Other 55 11302128 1255 W MARIPOSA AV, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-04259 ADU R 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N Rents 10206025 5609 JEFFREY CT, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP20-06677 ADU R 0 0 1 5/12/2021 1 N Rents 11515108 127 E STADIUM DR, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-09132 ADU R 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N Rents 7931045 136 PATRICIA AV, STOCKTON, CA 95210 BP21-07407 ADU R 0 1 11/30/2021 1 0N Rents 13714020 245 W ACACIA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP21-09145 ADU R 0 1 12/14/2021 1 0N Rents 13522514 908 N ORANGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP18-04342 ADU R 0 0 1 3/22/2021 1 N Rents 16318067 1956 S STOCKTON ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP18-02168 ADU R 0 0 0N 11020515 1102 W DOWNS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP20-06739 ADU R 0 1 6/30/2021 1 0N Rents 8207015 8445 KELLEY DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-09050 ADU R 0 1 11/30/2021 1 0N Rents 12605054 8959 LAUGHLIN AV, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-04863 ADU R 0 1 8/30/2021 1 0N Rents13336011 831 FIGUEROA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP21-06414 ADU R 0 1 10/28/2021 1 0N Rents 10810047 1431 W LONGVIEW AV, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP21-07628 ADU R 0 1 10/21/2021 1 0N Rents 15102312 1201 N SIERRA NEVADA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-06599 ADU R 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N Rents 10412057 336 HUNTINGTON CT, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP21-08216 ADU R 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0N Rents 10226010 213 NORWICH DR, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP21-02242 ADU R 0 1 4/5/2021 1 0N Rents15502032 115 DELLA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07996 ADU R 0 1 11/18/2021 1 0N Rents 13913001 244 N HUNTER ST, STOCKTON, CA 95202 Grand View Village BP20-04935 5+ R 075 2/3/2021 75 0 N AHSC, HOME, CDBG Other 16538002 1630 TURNPIKE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Turnpike Commons BP20-02669 ADU R 01 11/9/2020 1 1 8/18/2021 1 N HEAP Other 55 16538003 1626 TURNPIKE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95206 Turnpike Commons BP20-02671 ADU R 01 11/9/2020 1 1 8/18/2021 1 N HEAP Other 55 8137508 215 W SWAIN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP21-05071 ADU R 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0N Rents 15716043 1022 S GARDEN AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP19-06737 ADU R 0 1 10/20/2021 1 0N Rents 08137203 427 W PEARL AV, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP21-09178 ADU R 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N Rents 16714108 1549 S SUTTER ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-01217 ADU R 0 1 2/24/2020 1 1 3/1/2021 1 N Rents 15711040 823 S WINDSOR AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP19-03225 ADU R 0 1 2/18/2021 1 0N Rents 14906216 421 S EL DORADO ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203
HACSJ Crossway
Residences @ El
Dorado BP20-01943
5+ R
0 12 8/4/2021 12 0 N Other, MHSA Other 20
13938001 807 N SAN JOAQUIN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95202 Visionary's Liberty Square BP18-02584 5+ R 0 74 9/8/2021 74 74 12/16/2021 74 N AHSC, HOME, LIHTC Other 55 2 Attachment B
1175
Housing Element Annual Report
Table A2
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
7067032 2902 W EIGHT MILE RD, STOCKTON, CA 95209 Eight Mile House BP20-04596; BP20-
04598; BP20-04600;
BP20-04601; BP20-
04602; BP20-04603;
BP20-04604; BP20-
04605; BP20-04606;
BP20-04607; BP20-
04608; BP20-04609;
BP20-04610; BP20-
04611
5+ R
0 168 6/1/2021 168 0N
10411017 4830 KENTFIELD RD, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP20-08100 2 to 4 R 0 2 7/23/2021 2 0N Rents13302046 1241 DORAY CT, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP21-01104 2 to 4 O 0 2 7/23/2021 2 0N Rents06642025 10902 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08228 SFD O 0 1 1/4/2021 1 0N06642026 10906 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08229 SFD O 0 1 1/4/2021 1 0N06642029 10918 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08230 SFD O 0 1 1/4/2021 1 0N06643047 10927 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07052 SFD O 0 1 1/6/2021 1 0N06644045 6941 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07058 SFD O 0 1 1/6/2021 1 0N06644046 6945 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07060 SFD O 0 1 1/6/2021 1 0N06642020 10917 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07854 SFD O 0 1 1/6/2021 1 0N06642028 10914 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07855 SFD O 0 1 1/6/2021 1 0N 8424049 10844 PIAVE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-09342 SFD O 0 1 12/29/2021 1 0N 8423030 10845 PIAVE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-09343 SFD O 0 1 12/29/2021 1 0N 8423031 10853 PIAVE WY, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-09344 SFD O 0 1 12/29/2021 1 0N 06645023 6706 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08420 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N06645024 6712 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08421 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N06645025 6718 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08422 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N06645026 6724 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08424 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N06645027 6730 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08425 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N06645028 6734 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08426 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N06645029 6740 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08427 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N06645030 6742 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08430 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N 06645041 6741 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08431 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N 06645042 6735 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08432 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N 06645043 6731 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08434 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N 06645044 6725 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08435 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N 06645045 6719 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08436 SFD O 0 1 1/8/2021 1 0N 16378001 1647 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06942 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16378006 1617 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06947 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16378007 1611 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06948 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16378009 1612 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06949 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16378010 1618 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06950 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16378011 1624 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06951 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16378012 1630 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06952 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16378013 1636 SILVERSHIRE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06953 SFD O 0 1 1/12/2021 1 0N 16508069 163 W FIFTH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-07618 SFD O 0 1 1/13/2021 1 0N 08423002 132 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP20-08357 SFD O 0 1 1/13/2021 1 0N 08423003 144 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP20-08358 SFD O 0 1 1/13/2021 1 0N 16380014 1402 DELTA RIVER AV, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08307 SFD O 0 1 1/14/2021 1 0N 12217029 3138 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-08454 SFD O 0 1 1/14/2021 1 0N 12217030 3126 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP20-08455 SFD O 0 1 1/14/2021 1 0N 8424048 10852 PIAVE DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-09341 SFD O 0 1 12/29/2021 1 0N 06642055 6819 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06861 SFD O 0 1 1/20/2021 1 0N 15311330 2074 MYRTLE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP20-06790 SFD O 0 1 1/21/2021 1 0N 16827001 4734 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07208 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825001 4728 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07209 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825002 4716 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07210 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825003 4704 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07212 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825004 4636 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07213 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825005 4628 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07215 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825006 4620 MCDOUGALD BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07216 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825008 794 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07220 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825009 788 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07222 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825010 782 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07224 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 16825027 766 TILLMAN DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07226 SFD O 0 1 1/25/2021 1 0N 06642001 6806 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00414 SFD O 0 1 1/28/2021 1 0N 06642002 6810 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00415 SFD O 0 1 1/28/2021 1 0N 06642021 10913 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00416 SFD O 0 1 1/28/2021 1 0N06642030 10922 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00418 SFD O 0 1 1/28/2021 1 0N06642079 10942 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00057 SFD O 0 1 2/3/2021 1 0N06642080 10946 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00058 SFD O 0 1 2/3/2021 1 0N06642081 10950 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00059 SFD O 0 1 2/3/2021 1 0N06645014 10828 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00512 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645015 10824 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00513 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645016 10820 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00514 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645017 10816 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00515 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645018 10812 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00516 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645019 10808 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00518 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645020 10804 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00519 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645021 10800 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00521 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645022 6700 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00522 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645046 6713 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00523 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645047 6707 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00524 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06645066 10829 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00525 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06642003 6814 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00580 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06642004 6818 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00581 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06642005 6822 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00582 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06642006 6826 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00583 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06642007 6830 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00584 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06642008 6834 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00585 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 06642009 6838 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00586 SFD O 0 1 2/5/2021 1 0N 17742012 1950 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07618 SFD O 0 1 2/9/2021 1 0N 17742013 1958 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07621 SFD O 0 1 2/9/2021 1 0N 17742014 1966 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07695 SFD O 0 1 2/9/2021 1 0N 17742015 1974 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07696 SFD O 0 1 2/9/2021 1 0N 17742016 1982 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07698 SFD O 0 1 2/9/2021 1 0N 17742017 1989 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07700 SFD O 0 1 2/9/2021 1 0N 17742018 1981 SIMBAD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07701 SFD O 0 1 2/9/2021 1 0N 17138021 2624 NIGHTINGALE AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP20-06801 SFD O 0 1 2/10/2021 1 0N 14517022 526 MODESTO AV, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP20-06478 SFD O 0 1 2/11/2021 1 0N15311331 2080 MYRTLE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP20-06795 SFD O 0 1 2/11/2021 1 0N 12217024 3101 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00273 SFD O 0 1 2/11/2021 1 0N 12217025 3113 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00275 SFD O 0 1 2/11/2021 1 0N 12217026 3125 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00276 SFD O 0 1 2/11/2021 1 0N 12217028 3149 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00277 SFD O 0 1 2/11/2021 1 0N 12217031 3114 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00278 SFD O 0 1 2/11/2021 1 0N 16825011 776 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08203 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N16825012 770 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08204 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N 16825013 764 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08205 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N 16825014 758 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08206 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N16825015 752 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08207 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N16825016 746 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08208 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N16825017 740 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08209 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N16825018 734 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08210 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N16825019 728 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-08211 SFD O 0 1 2/17/2021 1 0N14709401 248 W JEFFERSON ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-00718 SFD O 0 1 2/18/2021 1 0N06642056 6823 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06863 SFD O 0 1 2/24/2021 1 0N 06642057 6827 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-06865 SFD O 0 1 2/24/2021 1 0N 06643045 10926 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07255 SFD O 0 1 2/24/2021 1 0N 06643046 10923 MATAKET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07256 SFD O 0 1 2/24/2021 1 0N 06644042 6929 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07257 SFD O 0 1 2/24/2021 1 0N06644043 6933 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07258 SFD O 0 1 2/24/2021 1 0N06644044 6937 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07056 SFD O 0 1 2/25/2021 1 0N06642076 10930 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00756 SFD O 0 1 2/25/2021 1 0N12217020 3037 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00959 SFD O 0 1 3/5/2021 1 0N 12217021 3051 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00960 SFD O 0 1 3/5/2021 1 0N 12217022 3073 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00961 SFD O 0 1 3/5/2021 1 0N 12217023 3089 FOGARTY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-00962 SFD O 0 1 3/5/2021 1 0N 06643014 10909 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07387 SFD O 0 1 3/11/2021 1 0N 06643015 10913 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07388 SFD O 0 1 3/11/2021 1 0N 06644012 6937 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07389 SFD O 0 1 3/11/2021 1 0N06644013 6933 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07390 SFD O 0 1 3/11/2021 1 0N06644027 6932 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-07391 SFD O 0 1 3/11/2021 1 0N 06642022 10909 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01347 SFD O 0 1 3/16/2021 1 0N 06642023 10905 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01349 SFD O 0 1 3/16/2021 1 0N06645048 6706 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01356 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645049 6710 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01357 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645050 6714 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01358 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645051 6718 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01366 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645052 6722 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01367 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645053 6726 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01368 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645054 6730 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01370 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645055 6734 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01372 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645056 6738 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01373 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645057 6742 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01374 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06645067 10825 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01375 SFD O 0 1 3/19/2021 1 0N06642010 10900 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01895 SFD O 0 1 4/1/2021 1 0N 06642013 10912 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01896 SFD O 0 1 4/1/2021 1 0N 06642024 10901 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01897 SFD O 0 1 4/1/2021 1 0N06643016 10917 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08249 SFD O 0 1 4/2/2021 1 0N 06644014 6929 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08253 SFD O 0 1 4/2/2021 1 0N06644028 6928 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08254 SFD O 0 1 4/2/2021 1 0N14734409 1214 S GRANT ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-06473 SFD O 0 1 4/6/2021 1 0N 16703508 1735 S SAN JOAQUIN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-01521 SFD O 0 1 4/12/2021 1 0N 11748037 2037 GAVIN CT, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-01819 SFD O 0 1 4/12/2021 1 0N 17743001 2977 S B ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02056 SFD O 0 1 4/12/2021 1 0N 17743002 1968 OLD OAK DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02061 SFD O 0 1 4/12/2021 1 0N 17743003 1960 OLD OAK DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02062 SFD O 0 1 4/12/2021 1 0N 12217080 10225 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-02152 SFD O 0 1 4/16/2021 1 0N 12217032 10238 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-01908 SFD O 0 1 4/19/2021 1 0N 12217033 10226 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-01909 SFD O 0 1 4/19/2021 1 0N 12217034 10214 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-01910 SFD O 0 1 4/19/2021 1 0N 06645009 10848 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02181 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645010 10844 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02183 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645011 10840 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02184 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645012 10836 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02185 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645013 10832 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02186 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645065 10833 KENTLEDGE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02187 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645068 10824 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02188 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645069 10828 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02189 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645070 10832 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02190 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645071 10831 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02191 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645072 10827 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02192 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 06645073 10823 LARBOARD CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-02193 SFD O 0 1 4/22/2021 1 0N 16526232 2530 S HARRISON ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-04996 SFD O 0 1 4/26/2021 1 0N 11748036 2013 GAVIN CT, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-01818 SFD O 0 1 4/29/2021 1 0N 06643018 10925 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00944 SFD O 0 1 4/30/2021 1 0N 06643020 10933 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00945 SFD O 0 1 4/30/2021 1 0N 06644015 6925 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00947 SFD O 0 1 4/30/2021 1 0N 06643019 10929 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00951 SFD O 0 1 4/30/2021 1 0N 09058011 8027 LORRAINE AV, STOCKTON, CA 95210 BP21-02129 SFD O 0 1 4/30/2021 1 0N08026002 9405 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-01302 SFD O 0 1 5/6/2021 1 0N 06644029 6924 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00948 SFD O 0 1 5/11/2021 1 0N 17744007 3028 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02579 SFD O 0 1 5/12/2021 1 0N 17744008 3040 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02580 SFD O 0 1 5/12/2021 1 0N 17744009 3052 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02581 SFD O 0 1 5/12/2021 1 0N 17744011 3076 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02582 SFD O 0 1 5/12/2021 1 0N 17744013 3061 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02583 SFD O 0 1 5/12/2021 1 0N 17744015 3035 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02584 SFD O 0 1 5/12/2021 1 0N 17744016 3017 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02586 SFD O 0 1 5/12/2021 1 0N 06642058 6831 SPARKS ST, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-00753 SFD O 0 1 5/14/2021 1 0N 06642059 10957 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01620 SFD O 0 1 5/14/2021 1 0N06642060 10953 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01621 SFD O 0 1 5/14/2021 1 0N16724049 640 E NINTH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07666 SFD O 0 1 5/20/2021 1 0N 16724048 642 E NINTH ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-07663 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06643024 10942 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01979 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06643040 10941 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01980 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06644016 6921 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01981 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06644030 6920 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01982 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06644031 6916 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01983 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645004 6717 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03183 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645005 6713 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03184 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645006 6709 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03185 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645007 6705 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03186 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645008 6701 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03188 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645059 6726 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03189 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645060 6722 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03190 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645061 6718 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03191 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645062 6714 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03192 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645063 6710 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03193 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 06645064 6706 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03194 SFD O 0 1 5/24/2021 1 0N 16314049 2051 S YOSEMITE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-01583 SFD O 0 1 5/25/2021 1 0N 16314050 2039 S YOSEMITE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-01585 SFD O 0 1 5/25/2021 1 0N17744010 3064 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02926 SFD O 0 1 5/26/2021 1 0N 17744012 3073 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02928 SFD O 0 1 5/26/2021 1 0N 17744014 3049 MALISA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02929 SFD O 0 1 5/26/2021 1 0N 08424023 36 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03267 SFD O 0 1 5/27/2021 1 0N 08424024 48 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03268 SFD O 0 1 5/27/2021 1 0N 08424025 60 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03269 SFD O 0 1 5/27/2021 1 0N 08424026 72 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03270 SFD O 0 1 5/27/2021 1 0N 12217035 10202 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03137 SFD O 0 1 5/28/2021 1 0N 12217082 10201 ZAPPA LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03139 SFD O 0 1 5/28/2021 1 0N 12218019 10201 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03141 SFD O 0 1 5/28/2021 1 0N 12218020 10213 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03142 SFD O 0 1 5/28/2021 1 0N 12218056 10200 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03143 SFD O 0 1 5/28/2021 1 0N 14709406 204 W JEFFERSON ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-00615 SFD O 0 1 6/3/2021 1 0N06642061 10949 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01639 SFD O 0 1 6/3/2021 1 0N06642062 10945 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01640 SFD O 0 1 6/3/2021 1 0N06642063 10941 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01641 SFD O 0 1 6/3/2021 1 0N16523010 2481 S COMMERCE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP20-05344 SFD O 0 1 6/10/2021 1 0N08026002 9410 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02236 SFD O 0 1 6/10/2021 1 0N 08026002 9410 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02236 SFD O 0 1 6/10/2021 1 0N 12218021 10225 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03320 SFD O 0 1 6/10/2021 1 0N 12218023 10249 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-03344 SFD O 0 1 6/10/2021 1 0N 08424019 10808 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03768 SFD O 0 1 6/15/2021 1 0N 08424020 10800 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03769 SFD O 0 1 6/15/2021 1 0N 08424021 12 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03770 SFD O 0 1 6/15/2021 1 0N 08424022 24 MOLVENO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-03771 SFD O 0 1 6/15/2021 1 0N 06642064 10937 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01642 SFD O 0 1 6/16/2021 1 0N06642065 10933 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01643 SFD O 0 1 6/16/2021 1 0N 3 Attachment B
1176
Housing Element Annual Report
Table A2
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
06642066 10929 GLADLANDS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-01645 SFD O 0 1 6/16/2021 1 0N15504008 1627 E SONORA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-01172 SFD O 0 1 6/17/2021 1 0N 16379055 1758 CROSSBOW LN, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP19-09187 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N15311211 2090 E WEBER AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP20-06517 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381037 1435 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03302 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381061 1412 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03305 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381036 1427 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03398 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381035 1419 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03408 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381034 1411 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03409 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381060 1418 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03411 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381058 1430 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03412 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381059 1424 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03414 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381039 1451 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03693 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381056 1450 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03694 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381038 1443 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03696 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381057 1442 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03708 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 16381055 1456 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03710 SFD O 0 1 6/23/2021 1 0N 06643025 10938 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03284 SFD O 0 1 6/25/2021 1 0N 06643039 10937 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03286 SFD O 0 1 6/25/2021 1 0N 06644017 6917 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03287 SFD O 0 1 6/25/2021 1 0N06644032 6912 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03289 SFD O 0 1 6/25/2021 1 0N08026002 9422 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02730 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 08026002 9401 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02741 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646001 6806 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04309 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646002 6812 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04310 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646003 6818 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04311 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646004 6824 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04312 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646005 6828 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04314 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646006 6832 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04315 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646018 6831 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04316 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646019 6825 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04317 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646020 6819 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04318 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646021 6813 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04319 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646022 6807 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04320 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 06646023 6801 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04321 SFD O 0 1 6/28/2021 1 0N 16826003 710 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02141 SFD O 0 1 6/30/2021 1 0N 16826002 716 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02142 SFD O 0 1 6/30/2021 1 0N 16826001 722 HENRY LONG BL, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02143 SFD O 0 1 6/30/2021 1 0N 08424017 10824 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04271 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 08424018 10816 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04272 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 08424027 10801 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04273 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 08424028 10809 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04274 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 08424029 10817 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04275 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 16381054 1508 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04295 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 16381053 1516 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04322 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 16381052 1524 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04337 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 16381040 1509 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04339 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 16381041 1517 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04344 SFD O 0 1 7/1/2021 1 0N 16381051 1532 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04563 SFD O 0 1 7/8/2021 1 0N 16381042 1525 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04574 SFD O 0 1 7/8/2021 1 0N 16381043 1533 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04578 SFD O 0 1 7/8/2021 1 0N 11747001 1907 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04438 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 11747002 1919 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04439 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 11747003 1931 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04441 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 11747013 1910 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04442 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 11747014 1916 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04443 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 11747015 1928 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04444 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 12218024 10261 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-04701 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 12218025 10273 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-04702 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 12218026 10285 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-04703 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 12218027 10284 HENLEY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-04704 SFD O 0 1 7/9/2021 1 0N 08026002 9414 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02823 SFD O 0 1 7/19/2021 1 0N 08046010 9414 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-02823 SFD O 0 1 7/19/2021 1 0N 17304021 1927 LADD TRACT RD, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP20-05296 SFD O 0 1 7/21/2021 1 0N 16381049 1548 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04905 SFD O 0 1 7/21/2021 1 0N 16381033 1410 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04906 SFD O 0 1 7/21/2021 1 0N 16381050 1540 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04908 SFD O 0 1 7/21/2021 1 0N 16381013 1415 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04952 SFD O 0 1 7/21/2021 1 0N 16381012 1409 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04953 SFD O 0 1 7/21/2021 1 0N 16381032 1418 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-04954 SFD O 0 1 7/21/2021 1 0N 06644033 6908 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03810 SFD O 0 1 7/28/2021 1 0N 06643026 10934 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03811 SFD O 0 1 7/28/2021 1 0N 06643038 10933 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03812 SFD O 0 1 7/28/2021 1 0N 06644018 6913 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03813 SFD O 0 1 7/28/2021 1 0N 06644019 6909 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-03815 SFD O 0 1 7/28/2021 1 0N 06642067 10936 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04023 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N 06642068 10940 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04024 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N 06642069 10944 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04025 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N 06642070 10948 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04027 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N 12218028 3301 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05010 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N12218029 3309 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05014 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N12218030 3317 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05015 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N12218060 3310 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05016 SFD O 0 1 7/29/2021 1 0N14524035 406 S YOSEMITE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP19-09309 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N 08424015 10840 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04930 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N 08424016 10832 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04931 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N 08424030 10825 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04933 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N 08424031 10833 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-04934 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N 16381015 1427 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05102 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N16381031 1422 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05106 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N16381030 1428 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05111 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N16381044 1541 BATTLEMENT DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05124 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N 16381014 1421 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05241 SFD O 0 1 8/4/2021 1 0N08424012 10864 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05157 SFD O 0 1 8/5/2021 1 0N 08424013 10856 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05158 SFD O 0 1 8/5/2021 1 0N 08424014 10848 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05160 SFD O 0 1 8/5/2021 1 0N 08424032 10841 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05161 SFD O 0 1 8/5/2021 1 0N 08424033 10849 VICO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05162 SFD O 0 1 8/5/2021 1 0N 06646007 6836 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05362 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646008 6842 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05364 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646009 6848 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05365 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646010 6854 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05367 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646011 6860 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05371 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646012 6866 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05372 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646013 6861 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05373 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646014 6855 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05375 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646015 6849 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05376 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646016 6843 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05377 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 06646017 6837 OAKUM WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05378 SFD O 0 1 8/9/2021 1 0N 12218031 3325 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05583 SFD O 0 1 8/11/2021 1 0N12218032 3333 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05584 SFD O 0 1 8/11/2021 1 0N12218061 3318 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05585 SFD O 0 1 8/11/2021 1 0N12218062 3326 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05586 SFD O 0 1 8/11/2021 1 0N16314051 2042 S YOSEMITE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-03296 SFD O 0 1 8/12/2021 1 0N 16381016 1433 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05566 SFD O 0 1 8/18/2021 1 0N16381029 1434 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05575 SFD O 0 1 8/18/2021 1 0N16381017 1439 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06020 SFD O 0 1 8/18/2021 1 0N16381028 1440 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06021 SFD O 0 1 8/18/2021 1 0N16381018 1505 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06022 SFD O 0 1 8/18/2021 1 0N11747004 1943 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05719 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 11747005 1955 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05720 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 11747006 1967 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05721 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 11747007 2001 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05722 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 11747008 2009 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05723 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 11747016 1940 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05724 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 11747017 1952 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05725 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 11747018 1964 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05726 SFD O 0 1 8/20/2021 1 0N 12218033 3341 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05885 SFD O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0N12218034 3349 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05886 SFD O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0N12218063 3334 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05888 SFD O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0N12218064 3342 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-05889 SFD O 0 1 8/24/2021 1 0N06643027 10930 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04252 SFD O 0 1 8/25/2021 1 0N 06643028 10926 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04254 SFD O 0 1 8/25/2021 1 0N 06643037 10929 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04255 SFD O 0 1 8/25/2021 1 0N 06644020 6905 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04256 SFD O 0 1 8/25/2021 1 0N 06644034 6904 WAMASQUID LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04258 SFD O 0 1 8/25/2021 1 0N 07140082 9712 TWIN CREEKS AV, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP20-08142 SFD O 0 1 9/7/2021 1 0N 16529012 373 HORTON AVE, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-00797 SFD O 0 1 9/8/2021 1 0N 16529047 373 HORTON AVE, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-00797 SFD O 0 1 9/8/2021 1 0N 16718220 1544 SIKH TEMPLE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-05716 SFD O 0 1 9/9/2021 1 0N 06642071 10952 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04028 SFD O 0 1 9/13/2021 1 0N 06642072 10956 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04767 SFD O 0 1 9/13/2021 1 0N 06642073 10960 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04768 SFD O 0 1 9/13/2021 1 0N 08424005 85 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05992 SFD O 0 1 9/16/2021 1 0N 16381026 1514 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06386 SFD O 0 1 9/16/2021 1 0N 16381027 1506 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06387 SFD O 0 1 9/16/2021 1 0N 08424006 73 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05993 SFD O 0 1 9/17/2021 1 0N 08424007 61 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05995 SFD O 0 1 9/17/2021 1 0N 08424008 49 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05997 SFD O 0 1 9/17/2021 1 0N 08424009 37 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05998 SFD O 0 1 9/17/2021 1 0N 08424011 13 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-06000 SFD O 0 1 9/17/2021 1 0N 11539039 4244 ALVARADO AV, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-06895 SFD O 0 1 9/23/2021 1 0N 06643035 10921 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05317 SFD O 0 1 9/27/2021 1 0N 06643036 10925 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05318 SFD O 0 1 9/27/2021 1 0N 06644040 6921 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05319 SFD O 0 1 9/27/2021 1 0N 06644041 6925 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-05321 SFD O 0 1 9/27/2021 1 0N 11747009 2017 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-06600 SFD O 0 1 9/28/2021 1 0N 11747011 2033 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-06601 SFD O 0 1 9/28/2021 1 0N 11747012 2041 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-06602 SFD O 0 1 9/28/2021 1 0N 11747010 2025 SHADY FOREST WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-06661 SFD O 0 1 9/28/2021 1 0N 12218035 3357 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-07098 SFD O 0 1 10/1/2021 1 0N12218037 3373 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-07100 SFD O 0 1 10/1/2021 1 0N12218038 3381 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-07102 SFD O 0 1 10/1/2021 1 0N12218065 3350 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-07106 SFD O 0 1 10/1/2021 1 0N12218067 3366 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-07109 SFD O 0 1 10/1/2021 1 0N12218068 3374 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-07110 SFD O 0 1 10/1/2021 1 0N16381019 1513 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-07147 SFD O 0 1 10/7/2021 1 0N 06642074 10964 MONOMOY WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04769 SFD O 0 1 10/12/2021 1 0N 15710133 714 BURKETT AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-04957 SFD O 0 1 10/12/2021 1 0N 06642075 6901 WAMASQUID, #LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-04970 SFD O 0 1 10/12/2021 1 0N 10810047 1431 W LONGVIEW AV, STOCKTON, CA 95207 BP21-07628 SFD O 0 1 10/12/2021 1 0N16412024 1845 DECARLI ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02563 SFD O 0 1 10/14/2021 1 0N 08424034 10850 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07189 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 08424035 10842 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07190 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 08424037 10826 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07193 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 08424036 10834 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07194 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 08424044 10827 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07195 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 08424045 10835 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07196 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 08424046 10843 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07197 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 08424047 10851 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07198 SFD O 0 1 10/18/2021 1 0N 16410001 2063 WATERCOURSE ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-02564 SFD O 0 1 10/25/2021 1 0N 06643029 10922 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-06405 SFD O 0 1 10/28/2021 1 0N 06644038 6913 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-06406 SFD O 0 1 10/28/2021 1 0N06644039 6917 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-06408 SFD O 0 1 10/28/2021 1 0N13336011 831 FIGUEROA ST, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP21-06414 SFD O 0 1 10/28/2021 1 0N 14343058 2575 E MINER AV, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-05401 SFD O 0 1 10/29/2021 1 0N 11747019 3671 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07643 SFD O 0 1 11/1/2021 1 0N 11747020 3657 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07645 SFD O 0 1 11/1/2021 1 0N 11747021 3649 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07647 SFD O 0 1 11/1/2021 1 0N 11747023 3627 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07649 SFD O 0 1 11/1/2021 1 0N 11747024 3611 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07651 SFD O 0 1 11/1/2021 1 0N 11747025 3533 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07652 SFD O 0 1 11/1/2021 1 0N 11747026 3525 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-07653 SFD O 0 1 11/1/2021 1 0N 08046013 9402 CARTER CT, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-05143 SFD O 0 1 11/4/2021 1 0N 16529012 2869 S VAN BUREN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06791 SFD O 0 1 11/4/2021 1 0N 16529046 2869 S VAN BUREN ST, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06791 SFD O 0 1 11/4/2021 1 0N 12202051 3307 RIGHTEOUS DR, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08428 SFD O 0 1 11/4/2021 1 0N16381021 1529 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-07956 SFD O 0 1 11/8/2021 1 0N16381025 1522 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-07957 SFD O 0 1 11/8/2021 1 0N09019024 8614 LEDGEWOOD AV, STOCKTON, CA 95210 BP20-05759 SFD O 0 1 11/10/2021 1 0N 16381020 1521 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08325 SFD O 0 1 11/15/2021 1 0N16381024 1530 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08326 SFD O 0 1 11/15/2021 1 0N 12218039 3389 FREY LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08086 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N 12218040 10272 NUGENT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08123 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N12218041 10260 NUGENT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08124 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N12218042 10248 NUGENT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08125 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N12218043 10236 NUGENT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08126 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N12218044 10224 NUGENT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08127 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N12218045 10212 NUGENT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08128 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N12218046 10200 NUGENT WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08129 SFD O 0 1 11/17/2021 1 0N06645001 6729 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08701 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N 06645002 6725 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08702 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N 06645003 6721 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08703 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N 06646024 6800 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08704 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06646025 6804 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08705 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06646026 6808 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08706 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06646027 6812 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08707 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06646028 6816 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08708 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06646029 6820 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08709 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06646030 6824 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08710 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06646031 6828 DON CONTI LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08711 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N06645058 6730 BATTEN RD, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08712 SFD O 0 1 11/23/2021 1 0N 16380051 1535 SILVERBELL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08693 SFD O 0 1 11/29/2021 1 0N 16381001 1536 SILVERBELL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08694 SFD O 0 1 11/29/2021 1 0N 16381022 1537 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08695 SFD O 0 1 11/29/2021 1 0N16381023 1538 GAUNTLET DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-08696 SFD O 0 1 11/29/2021 1 0N06643022 6906 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-07112 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2021 1 0N06643023 6910 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-07113 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2021 1 0N 06643033 10913 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-07114 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2021 1 0N 06643034 10917 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-07115 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2021 1 0N 06644037 6909 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-07116 SFD O 0 1 11/30/2021 1 0N 12202051 3338 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08682 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 3332 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08683 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 3326 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08684 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 3320 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08685 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 3314 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08686 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 10313 FLOYD LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08687 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 10319 FLOYD LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08688 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 10325 FLOYD LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08689 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 10331 FLOYD LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08690 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 12202051 10343 FLOYD LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08692 SFD O 0 1 12/1/2021 1 0N 11748001 1930 FONTANELLA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-08477 SFD O 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0N 4 Attachment B
1177
Housing Element Annual Report
Table A2
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulas Planning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023
Note: "+" indicates an optional field
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
11748002 1918 FONTANELLA WY, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-08478 SFD O 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0N11747028 3509 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-08482 SFD O 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0N 11747029 3501 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-08483 SFD O 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0N 12218047 3375 BUDDY HOLLY DR, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08713 SFD O 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0N 12218048 3367 BUDDY HOLLY DR, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08714 SFD O 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0N 12218049 3359 BUDDY HOLLY DR, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-08715 SFD O 0 1 12/6/2021 1 0N 17953016 3274 VERMILLION DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06611 SFD O 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0N 17953017 3266 VERMILLION DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06616 SFD O 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0N 17953018 3258 VERMILLION DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06619 SFD O 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0N 17953019 3250 VERMILLION DR, STOCKTON, CA 95206 BP21-06620 SFD O 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0N 11747027 3517 EL PINAL DR, STOCKTON, CA 95205 BP21-08480 SFD O 0 1 12/8/2021 1 0N 12219062 3431 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09367 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219063 3425 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09369 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219064 3419 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09372 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219065 3413 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09377 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219066 3407 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09378 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219068 3349 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09380 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219069 3343 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09381 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219070 3337 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09382 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219071 3331 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09383 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219072 3325 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09385 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 12219073 3319 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09386 SFD O 0 1 12/13/2021 1 0N 13305012 2834 MONTE DIABLO AV, STOCKTON, CA 95203 BP21-00988 SFD O 0 1 12/14/2021 1 0N 06644036 6905 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08178 SFD O 0 1 12/15/2021 1 0N 11132116 1747 LA JOLLA DR, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-03144 SFD O 0 1 12/17/2021 1 0N 08424038 10818 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07958 SFD O 0 1 12/20/2021 1 0N 08424039 10810 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07959 SFD O 0 1 12/20/2021 1 0N 08424040 10802 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07962 SFD O 0 1 12/20/2021 1 0N 08424041 10803 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07964 SFD O 0 1 12/20/2021 1 0N 08424042 10811 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07965 SFD O 0 1 12/20/2021 1 0N 08424043 10819 ALBANO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-07967 SFD O 0 1 12/20/2021 1 0N 06643021 6902 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08173 SFD O 0 1 12/21/2021 1 0N06643030 10918 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08174 SFD O 0 1 12/21/2021 1 0N 06643031 10914 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08175 SFD O 0 1 12/21/2021 1 0N 06643032 10906 MIACOMET CT, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08176 SFD O 0 1 12/21/2021 1 0N 06644035 6901 WHALERS WY, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-08177 SFD O 0 1 12/21/2021 1 0N12219026 10318 BONO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09752 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 12219027 10312 BONO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09754 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 12219028 10306 BONO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09756 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 12219030 10301 BONO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09758 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 12219032 10313 BONO LN, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09773 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 12219035 3402 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09776 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 12219036 3350 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09777 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 12219037 3344 SEGER WY, STOCKTON, CA 95212 BP21-09778 SFD O 0 1 12/22/2021 1 0N 11539001 902 E FARGO ST, STOCKTON, CA 95204 BP21-09118 SFD O 0 1 12/23/2021 1 0N06643001 6902 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-09794 SFD O 0 1 12/28/2021 1 0N 06643002 6906 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-09796 SFD O 0 1 12/28/2021 1 0N 06643003 6910 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-09799 SFD O 0 1 12/28/2021 1 0N 06643004 6914 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-09800 SFD O 0 1 12/28/2021 1 0N 06643012 6905 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-09803 SFD O 0 1 12/28/2021 1 0N 06643013 6901 TAILWIND LN, STOCKTON, CA 95219 BP21-09805 SFD O 0 1 12/28/2021 1 0N 08424003 109 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-09336 SFD O 0 1 12/29/2021 1 0N 08424004 97 PILATO DR, STOCKTON, CA 95209 BP21-09337 SFD O 0 1 12/29/2021 1 0N 5 Attachment B
1178
Housing Element Annual Report
Table B
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORTReporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element ImplementationPlanning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023 (CCR Title 25 §6202) 1 34
RHNA Allocation
by Income Level 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Units to Date (all years) Total Remaining RHNA by Income Level Deed Restricted - - 164 - 118 36 86 - - Non-Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - Deed Restricted - - - - - 27 75 - - Non-Deed Restricted 49 300 - 4 4 - 27 - - Deed Restricted - - - - - - - - - Non-Deed Restricted 138 194 47 80 457 14 6 - - Above Moderate 4,560 - - 175 243 - 392 694 - - 1,504 3,056 11,824
187 494 386 327 579 469 888 - - 3,330 8,494
Note: units serving extremely low-income households are included in the very low-income permitted units totals and must be reported as very low-income units. 1,518
Please note: For the last year of the 5th cycle, Table B will only include units that were permitted during the portion of the year that was in the 5th cycle. For the first year of the 6th cycle, Table B will include units that were permitted since the start of the planning period.Total RHNATotal Units Income Level
Very LowLowPlease note: The APR form can only display data for one planning period. To view progress for a different planning period, you may login to HCD's online APR system, or contact HCD staff at [email protected]. 1,167
404
This table is auto-populated once you enter your jurisdiction name and current year data. Past year information comes from previous APRs. 936
Moderate
3,157 2,004 2,103
Please contact HCD if your data is different than the material supplied here 486
2 Table B
Regional Housing Needs Allocation Progress
Permitted Units Issued by Affordability
2,753
1 Attachment B
1179
Housing Element Progress Report
Table D
Jurisdiction Stockton
Reporting Year 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31)
123 4
Name of Program Objective Timeframe in H.E Status of Program Implementation HE-1 (1): Adequate Sites
Monitoring: The City shall
biennially update its
vacant land inventory,
including an updated
inventory of potential infill
sites (smaller vacant and
underutilized parcels). The
City shall make the
updated inventory
available to the public and
development community
via the City’s website.

N/A Biennially
The City maintains www.advantagestockton.com to enable property inventory and public searches. ED and CD staff to update database with vacant/underutilized parcel list in 2021.

HE-1 (2): No Net Loss
Zoning: For any
downzoning or project
approval for fewer
housing units and/or at
lower densities than
assumed in the Housing
Element, the City shall
make findings that there is
still adequate capacity to
meet the remaining
housing need, consistent
with “no-net-loss” zoning
law (AB 2069).

N/A Ongoing Rezoning applications are reviewed and No Net Loss findings made when appropriate, as required by Government Code 65683.

HE-1 (3): Settlement
Agreement
Implementation: The City
shall develop a
comprehensive housing
strategy to meet the
housing targets identified
in the Settlement
Agreement. The
comprehensive strategy
shall include measures to
enable development of
4,400 residential units in
the Greater Downtown
Area by 2035. Potential
strategies could include
adopting less restrictive
zoning in the Downtown
and Greater Downtown, or
expanding the
Commercial Downtown
(CD) zoning district to
allow greater densities in
the Greater Downtown.
4,400 residential units in the Greater
Downtown Area by 2035 Ongoing
The City of Stockton continues to promote the successful completion of its agreed upon number of required affordable housing units as outlined in the City’s (Affordable) Settlement Agreement. The City has updated its Five Year Consolidated Plan, which describes the City’s Plan to create additional affordable units as well as the City’s recently completed San Joaquin Community Response to Homelessness Strategic Plan to create over 200 new units of permanent housing over the next five years. The development of an Affordable Housing Strategic Plan is also under development.

HE-2 (4):Public Facilities
Repair and Replacement:

Through implementation
of the Consolidated Plan,
and upon funding
availability, the City shall
continue to identify and
target low-income
neighborhoods for the
expansion of existing
facilities/infrastructure,
replacement of
deteriorating facilities,
and construction of new
facilities/infrastructure to
increase quality of life for
Stockton residents.
10 public facility/ infrastructure projects Annually
Since FY 2015-16, the City has funded more than 30 public facility projects with CDBG funds, and will continue to fund several projects in 2021-2022 including the Downtown Infrastructure Infill Incentive Program, rehab of sleeping quarters and bathroom at the Gospel Center Rescue Mission, rehab of a Community Medical Centers building, rehab of Women's Center - Youth & Family Services facilities that serve domestic violence victims and homeless youth, renovation of restroom facilities at Oak Park, and acquisition/construction/rehab funding for temporary or transitional shelters.

HE-3 (5): Study Fee
Deferral Program for
Affordable Housing: The
City shall develop a
program for consideration
of adoption by the City
Council to defer fees for
affordable housing until
certificate of occupancy.

N/A 2021
The Affordable Housing Nexus and Linkage Fee report was prepared in 2020- 2021. In addition, a RFP was issued in 2021 for preparation of a Housing Action Plan utilizing LEAP funds, with work to begin in 2022.

HE-3 (6): Coordination
with the Housing Authority
of San Joaquin County:

The City shall continue to
work closely with the
Housing Authority of San
Joaquin County in
providing assisted
housing through the
Housing Voucher Program
(Section 8), and in
providing housing and
supportive services to
special needs households
and individuals.
5,000 households countywide Ongoing.

The City continues to work with the Housing Authority of San Joaquin County in providing Housing Choice Vochers to residents. In 2021, the City approved the distribution ofHousing and Homeless Assistance Program (HHAP) and the Permanent Local Housing Assistance program (PLHA) funding to provide housing and supportive services to special needs households and individuals.

Housing Programs Progress Report
Describe progress of all programs including local efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing as identified in the housing element.

Table D
Program Implementation Status pursuant to GC Section 65583

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
1 Attachment B 1180
Housing Element Progress Report
Table D
HE-3 (7): State and
Federal Funding: The City
shall continue to apply
annually for Federal
entitlement funds under
the CDBG, HOME and ESG
Programs, and shall
pursue additional State
and Federal funding that
becomes available during
the planning period. The
City shall support housing
organizations and
affordable housing
developers by assisting in
applications for funding,
drafting letters of support
and resolutions, and
identifying potential sites
for affordable housing.
200 extremely low-, 400 very low-, 450
low-income units Ongoing.

Funding sources are evaluated annually. HOME funds are allocated as gap financing for affordable housing developers through an annual competitive application process. CDBG funds are used for the Single Family Repair Loan Program, the Single Family Emergency Repair Program, and to support housing organizations, such as San Joaquin Fair Housing. ESG funds are allocated to local emergency shelters homeless services, and for rapid re-housing and rental assistance services. In 2021, the City applied for or received funding from a number of State and Federal funding sources, including REAP, Homekey, PLHA, and HHAP.

HE-3 (8): Continue to
Operate Down Payment
Assistance Program: The
City shall continue to
administer its Down
Payment Assistance
Program for low-income
first-time homebuyers
using a variety of funding
sources including CDBG
and HOME funds.
75 low-income households Ongoing.

The City continues to operate the Down Payment Assistance Program and will work in 2022 to evaluate the Program for improvements to increase participation for low-income first-time homebuyers.

HE-3 (9): Priority Sewer
and Water Service for
Affordable Housing: The
City shall adopt policies
and procedures to provide
priority sewer and water
service for developments
that include lower income
housing units, consistent
with State law
(Government Code
Section 65589.7).

N/A 2021 Ongoing and will be further explored in 2022 as part of the updated vacant and underutilized sites for potential development list.

HE-3 (10): Inclusionary
Housing Evaluation: The
City shall conduct a study
to investigate the
feasibility of an
Inclusionary Housing
Program. The study shall
include an analysis of the
potential options and
requirements, such as the
appropriate percentage of
affordable units, income
eligibility criteria, methods
by which developers
could meet the
requirements, appropriate
resale restrictions on
ownership units, and time
frame for affordability of
units. Based on the
findings of the study, the
City Council shall
consider adoption of an
inclusionary housing
program, as appropriate.

N/A 2021 Consultants were hired in 2020, and completed the study in 2021.

HE-4 (11): Infill Strategy:

The City shall develop a
strategy to facilitate the
development of infill
projects in the Downtown
and Greater Downtown
Areas. The Infill Strategy
shall identify actions and
incentives to promote infill
development. These
strategies and incentives
could include allowing
less restrictive height
limits, setbacks, and
parking requirements;
planning infrastructure
improvements; and
streamlining the
permitting process.

N/A 2022
Infill stategy is continuing to be developed. The Downtown Infrastructure Infill Incentive Program provides financial incentives to eligible parties in developing new market-rate residential, commercial, or mixed-use projects in Downtown Stockton.

HE-4 (12): Infill Site
Assembly: The City shall
actively work with local
property owners and
developers to assist in the
consolidation and
assembly of small infill
parcels for residential
projects, particularly as it
related to parcels listed in
the sites inventory and
parcels with multiple
owners. The City shall
process lot mergers
ministerially, and shall
offer incentives, such as
expedited processing, in
addition to the incentives
already offered to infill
development.

N/A Ongoing Ongoing
2 Attachment B 1181
Housing Element Progress Report
Table D
HE-4 (13): Development
Outside Infill Areas: The
City shall submit for City
Council adoption
amendments to the
General Plan to ensure
that development outside
City limits as of the
effective date of the
Settlement Agreement
does not occur in a
manner that is out of
balance with infill
development (i.e,
development within
existing city limits). These
proposed amendments
shall include measures
limiting the granting of
entitlements for projects
(i.e., specific plan, master
plan, or other projects of
significance) outside the
City limits until firm,
effective milestones that
will assure that specified
levels of infill
development, jobshousing balance goals,
and greenhouse gas
N/A 2018/2019
The City’s adopted 2040 General Plan includes goals and actions on greenhouse gas (GHG) and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction. These goals stem from the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) and will continued to be implemented through entitlement and capital improvement plan (CIP) projects review. Applicable General Plan Action Items include: Action LU-6.1F: Evaluate and implement adjustments to the Public Facilities Fee (PFF) structure to encourage development in areas where infrastructure is already present and ensure that noninfill development pays its fair share of anticipated citywide capital facilities and operational costs. Action LU-6.2A: Develop and implement an infill incentive program that encourages infill development through expedited permitting, changes in fee structures, prioritizing infrastructure improvements in infill areas, property owner and/or landlord incentives to maintain property and reduce blight, and/or other strategies. As part of this program, the City defines and prioritizes categories of infill types based on land use and residential density or nonresidential intensity. Action LU-6.2B: Ensure prioritization of development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas be considered through strategies such as zoning changes and strategies to avoid gentrification. Action LU-6.5A: Require preparation of a fiscal impact analysis for large development projects and annexations to ensure a full accounting of infrastructure and public service costs and require fiscal mitigations when necessary.

HE-5 (14): Development
Code Amendment for
Compliance with State
law: The City shall amend
the Development Code to
allow care homes for six
persons or fewer in the RE
zone to fully comply with
State law, which requires
State licensed group
homes for six or fewer to
be treated as a single
family home.

N/A 2018/2019 This program was completed.

HE-5 (15): Review
Development Code
Standards for Possible
Revision: Following the
Comprehensive General
Plan Update, the City shall
review and evaluate the
Development Code for
consistency and shall
explore ways to maximize
housing opportunities on
small lots. Possible
changes to the
Development Code might
include:
* Reducing the minimum
lot area required for a PUD
or the possibility of
creating an alternative
zoning designation for
smaller lot developments
of less than 2 acres. The
purpose of this alternative
zoning designation would
be to allow different
development standards to
permit higher densities in
infill areas.
* Reviewing site
development standards to
N/A 2018/2019
Since adoption of the 2040 General Plan, the City has amended the Development Code in two phases to: remove AUP requirements for high multi-family residential development City-wide, allow ADUs & JADUs with flexible development standards, reduced or eliminated parking for housing developments (TOD, affordable housing, senior housing, small lots, etc.), maximized local Density Bonuses to allow 100% bonuses, and increased allowable densities. The City anticipates additional amendments related to Zoning Map and General Plan inconsistencies in a third phase in 2022.

HE-5 (16): Monitor Article
34 Authorization: The City
shall request voter
approval on a future ballot
for its Article 34
Authorization, which
expires in 2020.

Thereafter, the City shall
annually monitor the
number of remaining units
allowed under its Article
34 authorization and
schedule a new election
when needed to limit the
lack of authorization as a
constraint to the
development of affordable
housing.

N/A 2018
Measure K, which required a simple majority, passed with 74.86% of the electorate participating in the November 6, 2018 election, voting to approve. The election results were ratified by the Stockton City Council at the regularly scheduled meeting on December 18, 2018. The City continues to monitor the number of units authorized remaining, and will schedule a new election when needed.
3 Attachment B 1182
Housing Element Progress Report
Table D
HE-5 (17): FiscallyPositive Impact Fees: The
City shall develop and
adopt impact fees on new
development or other
ongoing funding
mechanisms (e.g.,
community facilities
districts) in accordance
with State law to ensure
that all development
outside the existing City
limits as of the effective
date of the Settlement
Agreement (i.e., non-infill
areas) is fiscally-positive
to the City. Specific
details of the fee structure
shall be determined as
part of the comprehensive
strategy for implementing
the Settlement Agreement.

As part of this process,
the City shall consider the
impacts on the cost,
supply, and affordability
of housing and
N/A 2018
Approved in 2018, the Greater Downtown Stockton Residential Development Public Facilities Fees (PFFs) Exemption Program provides a waiver for certain PFFs for all new residential development within the Greater Downtown Stockton area. The City-Wide Affordable Housing Development Public Facilities Fees Exemption Program provides an exemption for certain PFFs for new affordable housing developments located within city limits. For other developments that do not qualify under these two programs, the City's Stockton Economic Stimulus Plan (SESP) provides a fee reduction for single-family and multi-family residential projects and a 50% fee reduction for commercial and industrial projects within city limits. The SESP Program will expire when the City completes the Master Infrastructure Plans and PFF Nexus Study and the new fees are in effect, in approximately 2022.

HE-6 (18): Preserve AtRisk Units: The City shall
continue to work with
owners of “at risk”
projects to discuss the
timing of a possible sale
and potential sales price.

The City shall ensure
owners have met the
tenant noticing
requirements as set forth
in California Government
Code Sections 65863.10
and 65863.11. The City
shall contact non-profit
housing providers that
work in the Stockton area
to see if any are interested
in acquiring and
rehabilitating “at-risk”
projects. Assuming there
is interest, the City shall
provide technical
assistance as needed and
funding as available to
these housing providers.
552 at-risk units Upon receipt of notice of
intent to convert
The City will continue to conduct its annual and/or bi-annual Housing Quality Inspections of multi-family affordable housing projects funded with CDBG and/or HOME program funds to ensure the habitability and quality of the City’s affordable housing stock. Additionally, the City will continue to promote its Owner Occupied Rehabilitation deferred loan program for low-income homeowners to correct code violations and habitability issues.

HE-6 (19): Housing
Rehabilitation Programs:

The City shall continue to
administer its owneroccupied loan program
and emergency repair
program using a variety of
funding sources including
CDBG and HOME funds.
150 lower-income units Ongoing
The City continues to administer its owner-occupied loan program and emergency repair program, including the Single-Family Loan Program and the Single-Family Emergency Repair Program.

HE-6 (20): Code
Enforcement Program:

The City shall continue to
inspect housing units in
targeted areas to check
for building code
violations. In situations
where properties cannot
be rehabilitated, the City
will continue to enforce
the removal and
replacement of
substandard units
2,000 units annually Ongoing The City's Code Enforcement goals are on track.

HE-6 (21): Neighborhood
Stabilization Program
Funds: The City shall use
the remaining
Neighborhood
Stabilization Program
funds to rehabilitate
foreclosed properties
80 lower-income units 2016 NSP funds were used to purchase and rehabilitate foreclosed properties. Funds have also been used to acquire and/or rehabilitate six apartment complexes.

HE-7 (22): Point-in-Time
Homeless Count: The City
shall continue to
participate in the
countywide Point-in-Time
homeless count to
determine the number and
characteristics of both
sheltered and unsheltered
homeless in San Joaquin
County.

N/A Biennially in the month of
January
The San Joaquin Continuum of Care (CoC) recently conducted the 2019 Point-in-Time Count (PIT) which utilized methods of outreach that were considerably improved over prior years. Thus, the PIT identified a notably larger population of unsheltered homeless, compared to prior years. Based on this significantly improved response rate, the CoC can prepare more detailed and comprehensive estimates of need, including analysis of needs by type (e.g., housing, social services, etc.), as well as needs based on the characteristics of the respondent (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, veterans’ status, disability status, etc.).

These data can subsequently be used to better assess the needs of unsheltered homeless and can be used to direct any indicated changes in service provision. This is particularly valuable since unsheltered homeless are frequently among the hardest-to-reach regarding available services. The City is working with the CoC to determine the appropriate time to conduct the next Pointin-Time homeless count, given the circumstances of COVID-19. 4 Attachment B 1183
Housing Element Progress Report
Table D
HE-7 (23): Continue to
Support Organizations
Assisting Homeless
Persons: The City shall
annually apply for and
continue to pursue State
and Federal funds
available to the City,
private donations, and
volunteer assistance to
support homeless
shelters. The City shall
continue to provide
financial assistance
fromits Emergency
Solutions Grant (ESG)
funding to homeless
service providers and
continue to support
additional development of
shelter facilities as
requested by shelter
providers. In addition, the
City shall review the need
for additional shelter
facilities and services
when it updates its
Assist up to 4,000 unduplicated
homeless persons; 1,000 households
with one-time rental assistance.

Apply for funding annually
ESG funds continue to be allocated to local emergency shelter homeless services, rapid re-housing, rental assistance services, and the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS). As part of the 2020-2025 Consolidated Plan update that took place in 2020, the City reviewed and acknowledged the need to support the acquisition, rehabilitation, or construction of emergency shelter facilities.

HE-7 (24): Reasonable
Accommodation Public
Outreach: The City shall
prepare public information
brochures and website
information on reasonable
accommodations for
disabled persons, and
translate the materials to
provide information to
residents with language
barriers, The City shall
make this information
available at the public
counter and distribute the
materials to community
groups and organizations
that represent persons
with disabilities.

N/A Prepare and distribute
material in 2018
All City funded affordable housing projects and supportive service programs must affirmatively further fair housing through the marketing of the projects/programs to those least likely to apply. Marketing materials are forwarded to agencies that target individuals with disabilities, homeless persons and low-income households of various ethnicities.

HE-7 (25): Continue to
Assist the Disabled in
Community Development
Block Grant Project Areas:

The City shall continue to
include special provisions
for housing the disabled
in CDBG project areas,
including mobility grants
for homes (e.g.,
Emergency Repair
Program) and
handicapped accessibility
features.
120 individuals Annual contingent on
CDBG funding
The City funded the Disability Resource Agency for Independent Living (DRAIL) with $15,000 allocated in CDBG funds in FY 2019-20. The City also provided $7,550 in FY 2019-20 and $13,330 in FY 2020-21 CDBG funding to the Community Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired (CBVI).

HE-7 (26): Assist Farm
Workers: The City shall
continue to provide
ongoing assistance to
farm laborers by working
with the San Joaquin
Housing Authority, San
Joaquin County,
agricultural employers,
farm labor housing
advocates, and the
development community
to develop affordable,
decent housing for farm
workers.

N/A
Meet biennially to explore
opportunities for
farmworker housing
Ongoing.

HE-7 (27): Housing for
Persons with
Developmental
Disabilities: The City shall
work with the Valley
Mountain Regional Center
to implement an outreach
program that informs
families within the city on
housing and services
available for persons with
developmental
disabilities. The program
could include the
development of an
informational brochure,
posting information on the
City’s website, and/or
conducting workshops.

N/A Ongoing
City of Stockton will continue to provide capital and operating funding to nonprofits developers to encourage the development of new housing for persons with disabilities, including those with developmental disabilities, and for the improvement of existing housing units targeting disabled persons.

HE-8 (28): Analysis of
Impediments to Fair
Housing: The City shall
review and update its
Analysis of Impediments
to Fair Housing Report
every five years.

N/A 2020 The City updated its Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Report in early 2020, presenting it to the City Council on April 28, 2020. 5 Attachment B 1184
Housing Element Progress Report
Table D
HE-8 (29): Fair Housing
Referrals and Brochures:

The City shall continue to
provide funds from its
CDBG Program to San
Joaquin County Fair
Housing to provide fair
housing counseling and
education and outreach
efforts to city residents. In
addition to providing
contact information for
San Joaquin Fair Housing
on the City’s website
(under the Housing
Division), the City shall
continue to make referrals
to Fair Housing as
issues/cases come to the
City’s attention. The City
shall also work with Fair
Housing to periodically
review and update fair
housing brochures that
are provided to the public
and posted to the City’s
website. The City shall
distribute fair housing
information at City offices,
the library, community
N/A Ongoing
The City continues to provide CDBG funding to San Joaquin County Fair Housing. Coordination with Fair Housing is ongoing, with resources and contact information located on the City's website under the Housing Division.

HE-9 (30): Property
Assessed Clean Energy
(PACE) Program: The City
shall continue to provide
programs for property
owners to finance the
purchase and installation
of infrastructure
improvements to their
properties with no upfront costs for: renewable
energy, energy and water
efficiency improvements,
water conservation
upgrades, and/or electric
vehicle charging.

N/A Ongoing Ongoing
HE-9 (31): Green-Up
Stockton: The City shall
continue to encourage
voluntary energy
assessments for existing
housing units built prior to
November 1, 2002. The
City shall continue to work
with community services
agencies and PG&E and
other funding sources to
identify funding and
incentivize residential
energy efficiency projects.

N/A Ongoing Ongoing
HE-9 (32): Weatherization
Activities: The City shall
advertise local
weatherization programs
by posting information on
the City website and
distributing fliers and
brochures, and shall refer
elderly homeowners, lowincome households within
certain income limits, and
the general public, to
agencies offering
weatherization programs.

N/A Ongoing
The City continues to use HUD funds for the owner-occupied Single-Family Repair Loan Program and the Single-Family Emergency Repair Program, which includes weatherization activities. The programs are advertised on the City website.

A&I (33): Annual Housing
Element Implementation
Reporting: The City shall
review and report annually
on the implementation of
Housing Element
programs for the prior
calendar year, and present
the annual report to the
City Council at a public
hearing before submitting
the annual report to the
Department of Housing
and Community
Development (HCD) and
the Office of Planning and
Research (OPR).

N/A Annually The City is scheduled to present the Annual Housing Element report to the City Council at a public hearing.
6 Attachment B 1185
Housing Element Progress Report
Table D
A&I (34): Annual Staff
Review: The City shall
conduct annual staff
meetings to review the
City’s progress in
implementing the Housing
Element and addressing
housing issues, especially
issues relating to
affordable housing and
special needs housing.

The City shall use these
meetings to coordinate
Housing Element
implementation with all
City departments (e.g.,
Public Works, Fire, Police,
Economic Development,
and Recreation).

N/A Ongoing
Annual staff meetings are ongoing. Departmental staff, particularly ED and CD, communicate regularly on issues related to the Housing Element and addressing housing issues in Stockton. In 2020, CD staff launched an initiative, alongside ED, to create the City's first Housing Action Plan. An RFP was issued in 2021, with work to begin in 2022.
7 Attachment B 1186
Housing Element Annual Progress Report
Table F
Jurisdiction Stockton ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT Note: "+" indicates an optional field Reporting Period 2021 (Jan. 1 - Dec. 31) Housing Element Implementation Cells in grey contain auto-calculation formulasPlanning Period 5th Cycle 12/31/2015 - 12/31/2023 (CCR Title 25 §6202) Extremely LowIncome+ Very Low-Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Extremely Low- Income+ Very Low- Income+ Low-Income+ TOTAL UNITS+ Rehabilitation Activity 86 86 Visionary's Liberty Square (74); HACSJ Crossway Residences @ Park Street (12) Preservation of Units At-RiskAcquisition of Residential UnitsMobilehome Park PreservationTotal Units by Income 86 86 Table F
Please note this table is optional: The jurisdiction can use this table to report units that have been substantially rehabilitated, converted from non-affordable to affordable by acquisition, and preserved, including mobilehome park preservation, consistent with the standards set forth in Government Code section 65583.1, subdivision (c). Please note, motel, hotel, hostel rooms or other structures that are converted from non-residential to residential units pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c)(1)(D) are considered net-new housing units and must be reported in Table A2 and not reported in Table F.

Activity Type
Units that Do Not Count Towards RHNA+
Listed for Informational Purposes Only
Units that Count Towards RHNA +
Note - Because the statutory requirements severely limit what can be counted, please contact HCD to receive the password that will enable you to populate these fields. The description should adequately document how each unit complies with subsection (c) of Government Code Section 65583.1+
Units Rehabilitated, Preserved and Acquired for Alternative Adequate Sites pursuant to Government Code section 65583.1(c) 1 Attachment B
1187
Housing Element Annual Report
Table H
Jurisdiction Stockton
Note: "+" indicates
an optional field
Reporting Period 2021
(Jan. 1 - Dec.
31)
Cells in grey
contain autocalculation
formulas
Designation Size Notes
1 2 34 5 6 7
APN Street Address/Intersection Existing Use Number of
Units
Surplus
Designation
Parcel Size (in
acres) Notes
14926120 411 S Stanislaus St Vacant Surplus Land 1.66 N/A 14909504 536 E Lafayette St Vacant Surplus Land 0.14 N/A 14909503 534 E Lafayette St Vacant Surplus Land 0.09 N/A 14909502 530 E Lafayette St Vacant Surplus Land 0.11 N/A 14909518 548 E Lafayette St Other Excess 0.27
Parcel is Public
Right of Way and
access to adjacent
available parcel at
319 S. American
Street.
15703013 2849 E Lafayette St Vacant Excess 0.19 N/A
17526034 Lincoln Street & Horton Avenue Vacant Excess 0.06 N/A 17507008 Lincoln Street & Horton Avenue Vacant Excess 2.73 N/A 7730002 7823 Amber Way Vacant Surplus Land 0.13 N/A
7730001 7826 Amber Way Vacant Surplus Land 0.11 N/A
7749001 1450 W Hammer Lane Vacant Surplus Land 0.21 N/A 16902002 1805 S Airport Way Vacant Excess 0.34 N/A
16907703 2135 S Airport Way Vacant Excess 0.33 N/A
16904009 1814 S Union St Vacant Excess 0.18 N/A
14527009 705 W Weber Avenue Vacant Surplus Land 3.08
These properties,
known collectively
as "South Pointe,"
are under contract
via an ENRA.
14527010 Weber Avenue Vacant Surplus Land 0.29
These properties,
known collectively
as "South Pointe,"
are under contract
via an ENRA.
14527006 833 W Weber Avenue Vacant Surplus Land 3.73
These properties,
known collectively
as "South Pointe,"
are under contract
via an ENRA.
14519003 855 W Weber Avenue Vacant Surplus Land 1.97
These properties,
known collectively
as "South Pointe,"
are under contract
via an ENRA.
14918017 25 N Grant St Vacant Surplus Land 0.11 N/A
14918021 725 E Main St Vacant Surplus Land 0.34 N/A
13741009 Miner's Levee Vacant Surplus Land 2 N/A
Summary Row: Start Data Entry Below
Parcel Identifier

ANNUAL ELEMENT PROGRESS REPORT
Housing Element Implementation
(CCR Title 25 §6202)
Table H
Locally Owned Surplus Sites
1 Attachment B 1188
2021 General
Plan and Housing
Element Annual
Progress Reports
Stockton City Council
Agenda Item 16.1
March 22, 2022
1189
PURPOSE:

Annual Progress Reports (APR)
2 2015-2023
Housing Element
APR
2040
General Plan
APR
Submit to State
by April 1st
[Required by Government Code Section 65400]
1190
BACKGROUND:

Housing Element APR & Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) 3 State
of CA
SJCOG
City
Every 8 years
HCD provides
SJCOG with
regional RHNA
determination
SJCOG allocates
the regional RHNA
(40,360 units) between its
Member Cities & County
City adopts Housing
Element & reports
annual progress
toward
2015-2023 RHNA
(11,824 units)
The Housing Element - reviewed
by the state - is a required
element of the
General Plan
1191
HOUSING ELEMENT APR:

By The Numbers
4 Very-low income
0-50% of AMI
Low-income
50-80% of AMI
Moderate-income
80-120% of AMI
Above Moderate-income
120+% of AMI
2021 Units 86 102 6 694
2015-2020 Units 318 384 930 810
318 384
930
810 86
102
6 694
0 200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
888 BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED FOR NEW HOUSING UNITS IN 2021 3,330 TOTAL FOR 2015-2021
Area Median Income (AMI)
1192
HOUSING ELEMENT APR :

Policies + Programs
5 Must reflect local
housing needs
Indicate available land
and financial resources
Reduce identified
constraints
1193
2021 Housing Element APR:

Accomplishments and Ongoing

PRO-HOUSING
CODE

AMENDMENTS
+ ZONING
UPDATE
GRANT

FUNDING

RFP FOR

HOUSING
ACTION
PLAN +

HOUSING

ELEMENT
OTHER PROHOUSING
POLICIES +

PROGRAMS
6 1194
General Plan APR
Policies + Actions
7 Policies
Guide Staff, Planning Commission,
and City Council in their review of
land development projects and in
decision making.

Actions
Measure, procedure, or technique
intended to implement one or
more policies to help reach a
specified General Plan goal.
1195
2021 General Plan APR:

Accomplishments and Ongoing
8 Overlaps with items from Housing Element APR:
-Grant Funding pursued & secured
-Pro-housing Policies & Programs underway
Zoning Map Consistency with
General Plan Land Use Map
Series 3 underway
Kicked off
Development
Code Overhaul
Disbursed $35M
in Emergency
Rental Assistance
REAP Funding for
targeted
Neighborhood
Planning
33 Accessory
Dwelling Units
(ADUs) Finaled
1196
RECOMMENDATION:

APR Approval + Submittal to State
ACCEPT THE 2021 ANNUAL

PROGRESS REPORTS (APRS)

AND AUTHORIZE THE

CITY MANAGER TO SEND
THE REPORTS TO THE STATE.
9 1197
City of Stockton
Legislation Text
File #: 22-0057, Version: 1

CONSIDERATION TO CERTIFY A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A PREZONE AND ANNEXATION REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A NEW PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY AT 692 GRIDER WAY (APPLICATION NO. P21-0589)

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council:

1. Adopt a Resolution certifying the Grider Personal Storage Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and

2. Adopt an ordinance for the Pre-zoning of APN 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, 070-14- 010, 070-14-011, and 070-14-034 to Commercial, General (CG); and

3. Adopt a resolution authorizing the filing of an Annexation application with the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission to incorporate one parcel (APN 070-56-047, 070-57- 013, 070-14-035, 070-14-010, 070-14-011, and 070-14-034) totaling ±8.76-acres into the Stockton City Limit boundary and detachment from the Lincoln Rural Fire District.

It is further recommended that the City Manager be authorized to take appropriate and necessary actions to carry out the purpose and intent of the resolution.

Summary
The Project Applicant (Strategic Land Planning) proposes developing a new ±100,850 square foot, 570-unit personal storage facility with a 1,200 square-foot caretaker residential unit at 692 Grider Way at the northwest corner of Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road intersection. The project development site consists of four (4) vacant parcels (APN 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, and 070-14-010) and two (2) developed parcels (APN 070-14-011 and 070-14-034) totaling ±8.76-acres that are currently within the boundary of San Joaquin County. The proposed storage facility will include accompanying drive aisles, parking stalls, landscaping, pedestrian access, lighting, and utility services.

The Project is consistent with the property's General Plan Land Use Map designation of Commercial.

The design is consistent with the development standards within Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Title 16 (Development Code) and the City's Design Guidelines. To develop the Project, the City Council is asked to certify the Project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration, consider pre-zoning the proposed project site to Commercial, General and authorize an Annexation application with the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). The Annexation would include a detachment from the Lincoln Rural Fire District.

City of Stockton Page 1 of 5 Printed on 3/16/2022
powered by Legistar™
1198
File #: 22-0057, Version: 1

DISCUSSION
Background
The subject site consists of four (4) vacant parcels and two (2) developed parcels identified as Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, 070-14-010, 070-14-011, and 070-14-034 located at 692 Grider Way, presently within the jurisdiction of the County of San Joaquin, but contiguous to Stockton City Limit boundaries (Attachment A - Location Map and Aerial Photo). The site is bounded to the following:
· North: The Windmill Park subdivision with existing single-family homes on land zoned as Residential, Low-Density (RL);
· West: The Windmill Park subdivision with existing single-family homes and the Podesta Ranch Elementary School. The houses are within the City limit and zoned as Residential, LowDensity (RL), while the school is zoned Public Facilities (PF); · South: (across Grider/Whistler Way) existing businesses and undeveloped land currently in San Joaquin County; and
· East: (across Lower Sacramento Road) existing businesses and undeveloped land now in San Joaquin County.

A Zoning Map designation has not been assigned because the subject site sits outside the City Limits but is within the City's Sphere of Influence. The Applicant has proposed a Commercial, General (CG) zoning designation consistent with the nearby commercial properties within the City Limits along Eight Mile Road. The Zoning Map designations for properties adjacent to the City Limits and referenced above are identified in Attachment B - Zoning Map. The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject site as Commercial (Attachment C - General Plan Land Use Map).

Project Description
The Applicant has requested an Annexation, Prezone, Administrative Use Permit, Design Review, and Mitigated Negative Declaration to construct a new ±100,850 square foot single story 570-unit personal storage facility with a two-story 1,200 square-foot caretaker residential unit located at 692 Grider Way (Attachment D - Project Plans).

To minimize impacts on the existing residential homes, the Applicant will construct an 8-foot-tall masonry wall between the facility and existing houses and a 6-foot masonry wall along all publicly visible rights-of-way. All storage will be kept indoors, as a condition of approval has been added to prohibit outdoor storage of material or equipment. The Applicant will be required to install new landscape planters, 15-gallon trees, shrubs, and ground cover along the Project boundary in addition to street frontage improvements with new landscaping, sidewalk, and bicycle lane striping.

The two-story office and caretaker unit have been oriented south towards Grider Way, while the single-story storage units are behind the main building and screening walls. The buildings will be constructed using a combination of materials (stucco, metal siding, wood), colors (brown, red, beige, and charcoal), as the main entrance and Emergency Vehicle Access gates will use metal mesh fencing to help break up the façade. The Architectural Review Committee and Site Plan Review Committee found the proposed design complies with all City standards and recommended approval.

City of Stockton Page 2 of 5 Printed on 3/16/2022
powered by Legistar™
1199
File #: 22-0057, Version: 1
The proposed facility will be open Monday through Saturday from 8:00 am to 6:00 pm with direct access (right-in/right-out) from Grider Way. Should the parcels south of Grider Way annex and develop, additional access (left-in/left-out) may be granted upon review of traffic analysis prepared by the applicant. Overall, storm drain and sanitary sewer utility connections can be extended to the annexation area, with water service readily available and adequate to serve the property. Public Utility and Street Access Easements will be dedicated in accordance with City of Stockton Standards.

The proposed storage use is consistent with the existing General Plan designation and proposed prezoning of the site, and the necessary development approvals are within the range of probable development-related activities considered in the 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (GPEIR) and outlined in the project’s Mitigated Negative Declaration.

ANALYSIS
To develop the storage facility Project, the City Council is asked to consider certifying a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and approving a Prezone and Annexation request described in the analysis provided below.

Environmental Clearance
Per CEQA guidelines, it has been determined that the Project involves potential significant effects on the environment. Still, these effects could be reduced to a less-than-significant level with recommended mitigation measures. A Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the CEQA IS/MND was published in The Record on November 15, 2021. Since the review did not require State agency approval, the NOI provided notice of a 20-day public review/comment period on the draft CEQA IS/MND document. Public agencies were allowed to review the draft CEQA IS/MND with associate Mitigation Monitoring and Report Plan (MMRP) document. The review/comment period ended on December 6, 2021, with one comment received and responded to. The final CEQA IS/MND has been prepared to incorporate the comment (Exhibit 1 to the proposed Resolution).

The project design, with conditions, conforms to the City’s General Plan, Development Code, Citywide Design Guidelines, and State CEQA guidelines. Staff requests that the City Council adopt a resolution certifying the Final IS/MND document under CEQA for the Grider Way Storage Project.

Prezone
Because the Project site is presently located within the County of San Joaquin, Annexation must occur and be preceded by "Prezoning" to establish City zoning through a Zoning Map Amendment.

The Project, therefore, includes a request to Prezone the site to the Commercial, General (CG) Zone (Attachment E - Prezone Map). The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as Commercial. Pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan, the CG Zone is compatible with Commercial's General Plan Land Use Map designation. As reflected in the Proposed Resolution, all necessary findings can be made to support the proposed Prezone action.

Upon approval of the Annexation by the LAFCo, the Zoning Map Amendment would become effective and applicable.

City of Stockton Page 3 of 5 Printed on 3/16/2022
powered by Legistar™
1200
File #: 22-0057, Version: 1
Annexation
As the project site is presently located within the jurisdiction of San Joaquin County, the Applicant has requested Annexation of the project site into the City of Stockton (Attachment F - Annexation Map).

The project site is located within the City's Sphere of Influence and is designated Commercial by the General Plan Land Use Map.

Pursuant to SMC Section 16.212.050(C)(1), the City Council is the Review Authority for annexation requests upon recommendation from the Development Review Committee (DRC). On November 10, 2021, the DRC considered the Project's City Services Plan for the project site and forwarded an approval recommendation to the City Council (Attachment G - City Service Plan).

If approved by the City Council, the City Manager would be authorized to file an annexation application with the LAFCo.

Development Permits
The Director is the Review Authority for Administrative Use Permit and Design Review requests by Code. However, given that the Project’s physical development plans are integral to the environmental review and zoning aspects, the Director elevated the two recommendations to the Planning Commission for decision, as provided by SMC Sections 16.88.050(B)(5) and 16.136.020. On November 18, 2021, the Planning Commission approved the Administrative Use Permit and Design Review request subject to conditions of approval. This action is not effective until the City Council adopts the recommendations presently under review and LAFCo approves Annexation.

One of the Project’s conditions of approval (condition #16) involves consolidating the street name from Whistler Way and Grider Way to just Whistler Way. The condition allows the Applicant to consolidate the street name through the County or City, as the City regulates Street Name change by Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Chapter 16.160. The City name change process involves a fee for staff time and public hearing notice charges. The request must be presented to the Planning Commission for recommendation and approval by the City Council.

Public Comments
On October 28, 2021, per SMC Section 16.88.025, the Applicant held a neighborhood meeting to present the development proposal and receive feedback (Attachment H - Community Meeting Info).

Mailing notice was provided to property owners within 300 feet of the project site at least ten days in advance. City staff attended the meeting along with the Applicant and two members of the public.

Questions were raised at the meeting; however, no formal comment on the Project has been submitted to staff in opposition or support.

Notice for the City Council public hearing for this request was published on March 10, 2022, in The Record, and mailed notice was sent to all property owners within a 300-foot radius at least ten days prior. As of the writing of this staff report, no written comments have been submitted.

City of Stockton Page 4 of 5 Printed on 3/16/2022
powered by Legistar™
1201
File #: 22-0057, Version: 1
Planning Commission
On January 17, 2022, the Stockton Planning Commission approved the proposed Project design. No written comments were submitted before the Planning Commission hearing. One person representing the Applicant provided comments in support of the project during the public hearing. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to approve a Resolution 2022-01-27-0502-01 recommending the City Council certify the Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopt an Ordinance for the Pre-zoning of the Project site to Commercial, General (CG); and Resolution 2021-11-18-0502-02, approving Administrative Use Permit and Design Review, subject to conditions (Attachment I - Planning Commission Approved Resolutions). Construction of the retail building is contingent on City Council and LAFCo approval.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY
All application fees were paid to cover staff time processing the requested actions. The proposed project will result in a positive effect on City revenues due to sales and property taxes. When building permits are obtained to construct the Project, Utility connection and Public Facilities Fees (PFF) will be generated and received in the Utility and PFF revenue accounts. In addition, plan check and permit fees will be generated based on the building construction valuation.

Attachment A - Location Map and Aerial Photo
Attachment B - Zoning Map
Attachment C - General Plan Land Use Map
Attachment D - Project Plans
Attachment E - Prezone Map
Attachment F - Annexation Map
Attachment G - City Services Plan
Attachment H - Community Meeting Info
Attachment I - Planning Commission Approved Resolutions City of Stockton Page 5 of 5 Printed on 3/16/2022
powered by Legistar™
1202
BaseCamp

PROJECT SITE
Attachment A 1203
City of Stockton, CA
Grider Way Storag e Annexa tion Projec t (Zonin g Map)
Property Information
Property ID 15132011-109588
Location 1133 E JEFFERSON ST
Owner MADADY, SAMEER & BEHESHTA

MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY

NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.

Geometry updated 12/06/2021
Data updated 12/02/2021
Print map scale is approximate.

Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 1388.2048968258357 ft
Attachment B 1204
Map Theme Legends
Zoning
City of Stockton, CA Zoning Data

COMMERCIAL AUTO DISTRICT (CA)

DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL (CD)

GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG)

LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL (CL)

NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN)

OFFICE COMMERCIAL(CO)

GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(IG)

LIMITED INDUSTRIAL (IL)

PORT (PT)

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RL/P)

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RM/P)

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (RH/P)

MIXED USE (MX)

OPEN SPACE (OS)

PUBLIC FACILITIES (PF)
Attachment B 1205
City of Stockton, CA
Grider Way Storag e Annexa tion Projec t (Gener al Plan Land Use Map)

MAP FOR REFERENCE ONLY

NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT
City of Stockton, CA makes no claims and no warranties, expressed or implied, concerning the validity or accuracy of the GIS data presented on this map.

Geometry updated 12/06/2021
Data updated 12/02/2021
Print map scale is approximate.

Critical layout or measurement
activities should not be done using
this resource.
1" = 818.2089809150627 ft
Attachment C 1206
Map Theme Legends
General Plan Map
City of Stockton GIS data

ECONOMIC AND EDUCATION ENTERPRISE

RESIDENTIAL ESTATE

LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

ADMINISTRATIVE-PROFESSIONAL

COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

INSTITUTIONAL

OPEN SPACE/ AGRICULTURE

PARKS AND RECREATION

MIXED USE
Attachment C 1207
89° 10' 59"
909.73'
S E
46° 24' 00" 454.61' S E
41 ° 40' 29"
614.41' S
W
47° 08' 00" 319.81' S E
685 GRIDER WAY
APN: 070-140-34
LOT 34
.87 AC
611 GRIDER WAY
APN: 070-140-11
LOT 11
.06 AC
APN: 070-570-13
LOT 12
.25 AC
9993 LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD.

APN: 070-140-10
LOT 10

4.00 AC
10091 LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD
APN: 070-560-47
LOT 47

1.01 AC
692 W. GRIDER WAY
APN: 070-140-35
LOT 35

7.68 AC
692 W. GRIDER WAY
APN: 070-140-35
LOT 10.2

0.846 AC

ENTRANCE

EXISTING BUILDING ON SITE
692 W. GRIDER WAY
APN: 070-140-35
LOT 10.1

0.858 AC
DOMUM

STATE OF CAL I FORN IA

L ICENSED ARCHITECT
Ren. 3.31.

C-32555
TIMOTHY E.

ALATORRE
23 Issue / Revision Schedule:

Proj. No:Copyright Domum: All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute original and unpublished original work of the architect and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without prior written consent of the architect.

No. Date Description
Drawn By:Reviewed [email protected] Lonetree Blvd. Suite 102, Rocklin, CA 95765 888-352-ARC1
C:\Users\carte\Downloads\21-0514 518 - Sundance - Stockton - Design_v4 (2).rvt 12/7/2021 10:37:29 AM
APN: 070-140-10
2019.518
A1

COVER SHEET

WHISTLER STORAGE LLC

NEW SELF STORAGE

FACILITY
CKITEA
9993 LOWER

SACRAMENTO RD
STOCKTON, CA 95210

WHISTLER STORAGE LLC

NEW SELF STORAGE FACILITY
9993 LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
STOCKTON, CA 95210
PROJECT SUMMARY:

PROJECT INFORMATION

EXISTING PROPOSED
SITE AREA:OCCUPANCY:GENERAL PLAN:ZONING:CONSTRUCTION TYPE:FIRE SPRINKLER:NUMBER OF STORIES:BLDG. HEIGHT:NEW CONSTRUCTION OF [11] STEEL BUILDINGS TO INCLUDE[1] STICK FRAMED BUILDING TO HOUSE 1ST LEVEL OFFICE/MANAGER'S UNIT. EVA ACCESS AGREEMENT WITHADJACENT PROPERTY. 264943 SFVACANT C-C / B / S-1N/A

UNCHANGED
N/A YESN/A TWO (2)0" 27' - 7"

PROJECT SITE
PHONE:CONTACT:EMAIL:ARCHITECT:DOMUM6532 LONETREE BLVD., SUITE 102ROCKLIN, CA 95765 (888) 352-2721
Tim Alatorre
[email protected]
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:

PHONE:CONTACT:EMAIL:CIVIL ENGINEER:NORTHSTAR ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.620 12TH STREETMODESTO, CA 95354 (209) 524-3525
Brock Campbell
[email protected]
PHONE:CONTACT:EMAIL:OWNER:SUNDANCE DEVELOPMENT GROUP5701 LONETREE BLVD. 102ROCKLIN, CA 95765 (916) 656-0995
Ron Smith
sundancedg.com

PROJECT DIRECTORY INDEX OF DRAWINGSAREA SUMMARY

VICINITY MAP
EXISTINGLOT 47 44,099.00 SF 1.010 ACLOT 10 174,240.00 SF 4.000 ACLOT 10.1 37,417.00 SF 0.858 ACLOT 10.2 36,866.00 SF 0.846 ACLOT 12 11,921.00 SF 0.270 ACPROPOSEDLOT 304,543.00 SF 6.98 AC

BUILDING AREA
BUSINESSOFFICE 1,200 SF
1,200 SF
RESIDENCEMANAGER UNIT 1,200 SF
1,200 SF
STORAGEBUILDING A 5,600 SFBUILDING B 6,825 SFBUILDING C 18,925 SFBUILDING D 13,850 SFBUILDING E 10,800 SFBUILDING F 7,800 SFBUILDING G 7,425 SFBUILDING G CORRIDOR 725 SFBUILDING H 14,900 SFBUILDING I 5,500 SFBUILDING J 6,100 SF 98,450 SF
100,850 SF

BUILDING AREAS
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:

COMMERCIALCOUNTY (CG) COMMERCIAL GENERAL
1 SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" SITE PLAN

II-B, V-B
STORAGE LOT COVERAGEBLD 100,850 / 304,543 = 33.12 %
00 - ARCHITECTURALA1 COVER SHEETA2 UNIT LAYOUT PLANA3 FENCING PLANA4 PARTITION PLANSA5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA6 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSA10 RENDERINGSA12 SIGNAGE PLAN Attachment D
1208
OFFICE
ELECT.
10 X 10
10 X 30
GARAGE
5 X 5 10 X 15
ASR
5 X 10 10 X 20
10 X 25
41 ° 40' 29"
614.41' S
W
89° 10' 59"
909.73'
S E
46° 24' 00" 454.61' S E
46° 48' 23" 111.36' N W

43.60°

WHISTLER WAY -
- GRIDER WAY
46° 48' 23" 118.05' N W
41 ° 54' 47"
164.89' N
E
OFFICE

ENTRANCE

EVA ONLY ACCESS GATE
FENCE
FENCE 5
4 2
3 1
681 GRIDER WAY

LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
3 5
' -
0 "
2 5
' -
0 "
3 0
' -
0 "
2 5
' -
0 "
3 0
' -
0 "
2 5
' -
0 "
3 0
' -
0 "
2 5
' -
0 "
7 0
' -
0 "
1 5
' -
0 "
1 5
' -
0 "
1 0
' -
0 "
2 0
' -
0 "
1 0
' -
0 "
2 0
' -
0 "
1 5
' -
0 "
2 0
' -
0 "
555' - 0"
470' - 0"
370' - 0"
270' - 0"
500' - 0"
190' - 0"
10' -
0"
15' -
0"
30' -
0"
30' - 0"
20' -
0"
25' - 0"
190'
- 0"
10111 LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD
30' -
0"
25' - 0"
25' - 0"
200'
- 0"
145' - 0"
150'
- 0"
15'
- 0"
15'
- 0"
10'
- 0"

HOSE LENGTH
R 150' - 0"
40' - 0"
R 25' - 0" R 50' - 0"
A5
3 A6
1 4
23 20' -
0"
20' -
0"
25' -
0"
2 5
' -
0 "
A5
12 BUILDING H

BUILDING A

BUILDING GBUILDING CBUILDING DBUILDING E

BUILDING J

BUILDING I

BUILDING F

BUILDING B
A6
5 DOMUM

STATE OF CAL I FORN IA

L ICENSED ARCHITECT
Ren. 3.31.

C-32555
TIMOTHY E.

ALATORRE
23 Issue / Revision Schedule:

Proj. No:Copyright Domum: All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute original and unpublished original work of the architect and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without prior written consent of the architect.

No. Date Description
Drawn By:Reviewed [email protected] Lonetree Blvd. Suite 102, Rocklin, CA 95765 888-352-ARC1
C:\Users\carte\Downloads\21-0514 518 - Sundance - Stockton - Design_v4 (2).rvt 12/7/2021 10:16:05 AM
APN: 070-140-10
2019.518
A2

UNIT LAYOUT
PLAN

WHISTLER STORAGE LLC

NEW SELF STORAGE

FACILITY
CKITEA
9993 LOWER

SACRAMENTO RD
STOCKTON, CA 95210

PARKING SCHEDULE
BUILDING AREAS UNIT MIX per BUILDING

MODEL COUNT
BUSINESS9 x 18 49 x 18 (8' AISLE) 1
5 GRAND TOTAL 5
1 SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN
UNIT LEGEND UNIT MIX per SIZE
NAME TYP. UNIT AREA AREA UNIT COUNT %

STORAGE
5 x 5 25 SF 650 SF 26 1%
5 x 10 50 SF 800 SF 16 1%
10 x 10 100 SF 10,850 SF 108 11%10 x 15 150 SF 26,050 SF 174 27%10 x 20 200 SF 28,200 SF 141 29%10 x 25 250 SF 6,000 SF 24 6%10 x 30 300 SF 24,300 SF 81 25% 96,850 SF 570 100%
NAME TYP. UNIT AREA AREA UNIT COUNT
10 x 10 100 SF 2,600 SF 2610 x 15 150 SF 300 SF 2
10 x 20 200 SF 4,800 SF 24
7,775 SF 55

BUILDING G
5 x 5 25 SF 150 SF 6
5 x 10 50 SF 100 SF 2
10 x 10 100 SF 2,000 SF 2010 x 15 150 SF 1,750 SF 1210 x 20 200 SF 3,400 SF 17 7,400 SF 57

BUILDING H
5 x 5 25 SF 125 SF 5
5 x 10 50 SF 50 SF 1
10 x 15 150 SF 300 SF 2
10 x 30 300 SF 14,400 SF 48
14,875 SF 56

BUILDING I
5 x 5 25 SF 25 SF 1
5 x 10 50 SF 50 SF 1
10 x 10 100 SF 1,999 SF 2010 x 15 150 SF 1,200 SF 810 x 20 200 SF 2,200 SF 11 5,474 SF 41

BUILDING J
5 x 5 25 SF 25 SF 1
5 x 10 50 SF 150 SF 3
10 x 20 200 SF 200 SF 1
10 x 30 300 SF 4,800 SF 16
5,175 SF 21
96,849 SF 570
NAME TYP. UNIT AREA AREA UNIT COUNT

BUILDING A
5 x 5 25 SF 25 SF 1
5 x 10 50 SF 50 SF 1
10 x 10 100 SF 200 SF 2
10 x 20 200 SF 200 SF 1
10 x 30 300 SF 5,100 SF 17
5,575 SF 22

BUILDING B
5 x 5 25 SF 100 SF 4
10 x 10 100 SF 100 SF 1
10 x 15 150 SF 600 SF 4
10 x 25 250 SF 6,000 SF 24
6,800 SF 33

BUILDING C
5 x 5 25 SF 25 SF 1
5 x 10 50 SF 300 SF 6
10 x 15 150 SF 8,250 SF 5510 x 20 200 SF 10,600 SF 53
19,175 SF 115

BUILDING D
5 x 5 25 SF 75 SF 3
10 x 10 100 SF 400 SF 4
10 x 15 150 SF 13,350 SF 89
13,825 SF 96

BUILDING E
5 x 5 25 SF 25 SF 1
5 x 10 50 SF 100 SF 2
10 x 10 100 SF 3,550 SF 3510 x 15 150 SF 300 SF 2
10 x 20 200 SF 6,800 SF 34
10,775 SF 74

BUILDING F
5 x 5 25 SF 75 SF 3
PER SAN JOAQUIN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 9 DEVELOPMENT TITLE.DIVISION 10 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CHAPTER 9-1015.3 REQUIREDPARKING SPACES.TABLE 9-1015.3(b): (PERSONAL STORAGE), 1 SPACE REQUIRED PER 1000 SF OF BUILDING.1200 SF OFFICE / 1000 SF = 1.2 = 2 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED.

BUILDING AREA
BUSINESSOFFICE 1,200 SF
1,200 SF
RESIDENCEMANAGER UNIT 1,200 SF
1,200 SF
STORAGEBUILDING A 5,600 SFBUILDING B 6,825 SFBUILDING C 18,925 SFBUILDING D 13,850 SFBUILDING E 10,800 SFBUILDING F 7,800 SFBUILDING G 7,425 SFBUILDING G CORRIDOR 725 SFBUILDING H 14,900 SFBUILDING I 5,500 SFBUILDING J 6,100 SF 98,450 SF
100,850 SF
Attachment D
1209
UP
DN
REF.

N O PA R K I N G

PROPOSED BUILDING

PROPOSED BUILDING

PROPOSED BUILDING

PROPOSED BUILDING

PROPOSED BUILDING

PROPOSED BUILDING
FF= 0000.00
FF= 0000.00
FF= 0000.00
FF= 0000.00
FF= 0000.00
FF= 0000.00
FF= 0000.00
FF= 0000.00
89° 10' 59"
909.73'
S E
46° 24' 00" 454.61' S E
41 ° 40' 29"
614.41' S
W
47° 08' 00" 319.81' S EXIT ON E LY

WHISTLER WAY -- GRIDER WAY EVA ONLY ACCESS GATE DOUBLE ROLLER GATE FENCE 8' EXPANDED METAL FENCE

ENTRANCE
8" W. CMU WALL
8" W. CMU WALL
8" CMU WALL
OFFICE
FIRE HOSE REACH R 150' - 0"
R 25' - 0" R 50' - 0"

FIRE TURN RADIUS

BUILDING H
OFFICE

BUILDING A

BUILDING G

BUILDING CBUILDING DBUILDING E

BUILDING J
OFFICE

BUILDING I

BUILDING F

BUILDING B
8' EXPANDED METAL FENCE
8' EXPANDED METAL FENCE
R
5 0
'
-
0 "
R 25'
- 0"
1 3
4 2
5 PATH OF TRAVEL
(2) BICYCLE RACK
EXIT KEYPAD ON CONC. POST
30'-0" ROLLING GATE @ ENTRY AND EXIT
16' - 0" 10' - 0"
ROLLING TRASH AND RECYCLABLE BINS FOR OFFICE/MANAGER'S UNIT.

A3
4 (N) SIDEWALK
8' - 0" H. C.M.U WALLMETAL BUILDING WALL8' - 0" H. EXPANDED METAL FENCE 6" SEE FENCING PLAN
1" x 1-1/2" T.S TOP RAIL
2" SQUARE TUBULAR STEEL POST

EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE
FOOTING AT +/- 8'-0" O.C. AND 4"

SQUARE TUBULAR STEEL POST AT
ENTRANCES.
6"
1" IN. 7R EXPANDED

METAL PANELING

SLOPE TOP FOOTING FOR DRAINAGE
1" x 1-1/2" T.S BOTTOM RAIL.

FINISH GRADE
6" DEEP CONCRETE CURB

CONTINUOUS UNDER
FENCE.
12" DIA. x 30" DEEP
CONCRETE FOOTING.

SET POST INTO
FOOTING.

PAVING - SEE PLAN.
12"
42" 6" 94"
12"
NOTES:

1. ALL TUBULAR STEEL FENCING TO BE POWDER COATED. COLOR AND FINISH TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.

2. FENCE IS TO BE INDEPENDENT WITH NO BOLTS OR ATTACHMENT TO BUILDINGS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON DETAILS AND APPROVED BY OWNER.

3. FENCE TO MEET ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS.
36" 6" LAYER OF GRAVEL PROPOSED
DOMUM

STATE OF CAL I FORN IA

L ICENSED ARCHITECT
Ren. 3.31.

C-32555
TIMOTHY E.

ALATORRE
23 Issue / Revision Schedule:

Proj. No:Copyright Domum: All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute original and unpublished original work of the architect and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed without prior written consent of the architect.

No. Date Description
Drawn By:Reviewed [email protected] Lonetree Blvd. Suite 102, Rocklin, CA 95765 888-352-ARC1
C:\Users\carte\Downloads\21-0514 518 - Sundance - Stockton - Design_v4 (2).rvt 12/7/2021 10:50:26 AM
APN: 070-140-10
2019.518
A3

FENCING PLAN

WHISTLER STORAGE LLC

NEW SELF STORAGE

FACILITY
CKITEA
9993 LOWER

SACRAMENTO RD
STOCKTON, CA 95210
1 SCALE: 1" = 50'-0" SITE PLAN 2 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ENLARGED ENTRANCE

FENCE LEGEND
3 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" FENCING DETAIL - EXPANDED MESH 4 SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" BICYCLE RACK - STAPLE 5 SCALE: 6" = 1'-0" EXPANDED MESH FENCE
Attachment D
1210
OMEGA
1 COAT STUCCO
M1

WOOD TRIM
-
M2
M4

FOAM TRIM
-
M3

METAL ROOFING
- MCBI
- AUTUMN RED OR EQUIVALENT
OMEGA - 9262 ASH GRAY OR SIM.

MCBI - DESERT SAND
P2

SHERWIN- WILLIAMS
- ANTIQUE RED -SW 7587

OR MCBI - RUSTIC RED
P1
OMEGA - 9258 GRAVITY OR SIM.

MCBI - SANDSTONE
P4

METAL PANEL
- MCBI
- LIGHT STONE OR EQUIVALENT
M5
OMEGA - 9206 MOONSHINE OR SIM.

MCBI - LIGHTSTONE
P3
M6 STUCCO
SHERWIN WILLIAMS OR SIM.
-SW 7027

MBCI - KOKO BROWN
P5
M7 CONCRETE TILT UP
SHERWIN WILLIAMS OR SIM.
-SW 9610

MBCI - CHARCOAL
P5 02 T.P
21' - 8"
01-T.P
11' - 6"
02 - F.F
12' - 8"
00 F.G
0"
00 F.G
0"
01 S.T.P
9' - 6"
01a S.F.F
1 1/4"

TOP OF PARAPET
11' - 6"
02a T.O.P
24' - 8"
02b T.O.P
27' - 8"
17' - 7" 1' - 6" 17' - 0" 1' - 6" 27' - 7" 10' - 0" 2' - 0" 36' - 0" 2' - 0" 00 F.G
0"
01 S.T.P
9' - 6"
01a S.F.F
1 1/4"

TOP OF PARAPET
11' - 6"
65' - 2"
01 F.F.
6"
00 F.G
0"
01 S.T.P
9' - 6"
01a S.F.F
1 1/4"

TOP OF PARAPET
11' - 6"
20' - 2"

FOAM TRIM
1' - 6" 17' - 0"

FOAM TRIM
1' - 6"
6' - 6"
8' - 0" 4' - 0"
1' - 6"
8' - 0"

ORNAMENTAL FENCE
44' - 7"
1"
1" REVEAL TYP.
1' - 0" 12' - 0"
01 F.F.
6"
02 T.P
21' - 8"
01-T.P
11' - 6"
02 - F.F
12' - 8"
00 F.G
0"
01 S.T.P
9' - 6"
01a S.F.F
1 1/4"

TOP OF PARAPET
11' - 6"
02a T.O.P
24' - 8"
02b T.O.P
27' - 8"
3' - 0" 3' - 0" 9' - 0" 1' - 2" 11' - 0"
2' - 0" 36' - 0" 2' - 0" 15' - 0" 30' - 0" 1' - 6" 17' - 0" 1' - 6" 20' - 2" 1' - 0" 12' - 0" 7' - 0" 2' - 1" 4' - 0" 9' - 0" OFFICE
40' - 0"
DOMUM

STATE OF CAL I FORN IA

L ICENSED ARCHITECT
Ren. 3.31.

C-32555
TIMOTHY E.

ALATORRE
23 Issue / Revision Schedule:

Proj. No:

Copyright Domum: All drawings and written
material appearing herein constitute original
and unpublished original work of the architect
and may not be duplicated, used, or disclosed
without prior written consent of the architect. No. Date Description Drawn By:

Reviewed
[email protected]
6532 Lonetree Blvd. Suite 102, Rocklin, CA 95765
888-352-ARC1
Z:\Active\2019.518 - Bateman - Stockton\CAD\21-0514 518 - Sundance - Stockton - Design_v4.rvt 9/24/2021 11:25:48 AMAPN: 070
-140
-10
2019.518
A5

EXTERIOR

ELEVATIONS

BATEMANNEW SELF STORAGE

FACILITY
CKI
TEA
9993 LOWER

SACRAMENTO RD
STOCKTON, CA 95210

COLORS AND MATERIALS
1'0' 2' 4' 8' 16' 24'
1/8"=1'-0"
3 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION - GRIDER WAY - BLDG. A - 1.1
4 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION - GRIDER WAY - BLDG. A - 1.2
1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION - GRIDER WAY - BLDG. J - 1.1
2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
ELEVATION - GRIDER WAY - BLDG. J - 1.2
M1/P3 M3/P1 M5/P2 M7/P2 M3/P1 M7/P3 M3/P2
Attachment D1211
EXHIBIT "A"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

PREZONE TO

COMMERCIAL, GENERAL (CG)
ALL that certain real property, situate in the South one-half of Section 4, Towns North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Westerly corner of Parcel 2 as shown on that certain Parcel ap filed for record in Book 25 of Parcel Maps, at Page 34, San Joaquin County Records, said Westerly corner being also on the Northeast line of a 60-foot wide Irrevocable O er of Dedication for the extension of Grider Way as shown on said map;

1. thence North 45°
22'15" West 45.67 feet to the beginning of a curve cone ve to the Southwest, having a radius of 1119.06 feet;

2. thence Northwesterly 52.26 feet along the arc of said curve, through a ce tral angle of 02°
40'32" to a point on the Northeast line of a Street Easement a described in Easement Deed to the City of Stockton, recorded April 16, 2 10, as Document No. 2010-052194, San Joaquin County Records;
thence along last said Northeast line the following five (5) courses

3. along a non-tangent line North 48°
02'46" West 100.01 feet to the beginni
curve concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 1119.06 feet;

4. Northwesterly 173.45 feet along the arc of said curve, through a central a gle of 08°
52'50";

5. along a non-tangent line North 56°
55'37" West 107.30 feet to the beginnin of a
curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 1081. 06 feet;

6. Northwesterly 97.05 feet along the arc of said curve, through a central an le of 05°
08'36" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave to the Southwest, having a radius of 1122.06 feet and to which beginning a radial line bears South 38°
12'59" West;

7. Northwesterly 77.48 feet along the arc of said curve, through a central ang e of 03°
57'22" to a point on the North line of Parcel "D" as shown on that certai Parcel Map filed in Book 8 of Parcel Maps, at Page 23, San Joaquin Coun y Records;
thence along said North line the following two (2) courses

8. North 87°
53'27" East 117. 72 feet;

Attachment E 1212

9. North 86°
20'27" East 149.15 feet to the point of intersection of said Pare I "D" and the West line of Parcel Four, as described in Gift Deed, recorded December 24, 1998, as Instrument No. 98154296, San Joaquin County

10. thence South 55°
40'13" East 219.67 feet to the termination of the Northe st line of said Parcel "D", said point being on the South line of said Parcel Four nd the Westerly corner of Parcel Seven, as described in said Instrument No. 98 54296;

11. thence South 89°
07'28" East 910.17 feet along the North line of said Par el Seven and Parcel Six, as described in said Instrument No. 98154296 to point on the Southwest line of Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way;

12. thence South 23°17'56" East 9.67 feet along said Southwest right-of-wa line to the point of intersection of said Southwest right-of-way line and the Nort west right-of-way line of Lower Sacramento Road, said point being Northwest rly

40.00 feet distant at right angles from the centerline of said Lower Sacra ento Road;

13. thence South 41°
40'42" West 734.78 feet along said Northwest right-of- ay line and parallel with said centerline to the Northeasterly corner of the propert described in that certain Resolution filed for record April 28, 1983 as Instr ment Number 83029652, San Joaquin County Records;

14. thence along the Northerly line of last said property South 86° 42'58" We t

42.43 feet to a point on the Southwesterly line of Parcel "C" as shown on that certain Parcel Map filed in Book 8 of Parcel Maps, at Page 23, San Joaq in County Records;

15. thence along said Southwesterly line of Parcel "C" and the Southwester! said Parcel 2 North 48°
16'40" West 425.07 feet to the POINT OF BEGIN
Containing 382,242 square feet (8.78 acres), more or less.

A bearing of South 41 ° 40'42" West for the centerline of Lower Sacramento Roa shown on that certain Record of Survey filed in Book 38 of Surveys, at Page 11 , San Joaquin County Records, was used as a basis for all bearings. Distances shown are ground distances.

All as shown on EXHIBIT "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part ereof. /726/f(lJ\t.-.J_
Rien Groenewoud, P.L.S. 6946

Attachment E 1213
\
. \

LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE

LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE RADIUS BEARING LENGTH
L1 N45'22'15"W 45.67' C1 1119.06' 02·40'32" 52.26'
L2 N48'02'46"W 100.01' C2 1119.06' 08·52'50" 173.45'
L3 N56.55'37"W 107.30' C3 1081.06' os·o8'36" 97.05'
L4 N87'53'27"E 117.72' C4 1122.06' 03'57'22" 77.48' "
L5 N86'20'27"E 149.15'
L6 523i7'56"E 9.67'
L7 586'42'58"W 42.43'
\ ��
Q) LINE NUMBER; SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION \ \ /a."1/\ \
\ \
\
1C'°'
-
·
\
S"--:'
��-<
"'
c,O
I
/
---
\, sl'fff>.'1-c� 1-10•
1t1S· t,'l.g
liJ
9 2
1 "
----------
st-
✓�
tl
'!-c�1, ('IO·
ff>. 1t1S· ',f2,9
'il
9 2
\
--� /
/ fl,►�
o\)'�
30� ADJUSTED PARCEJ.. 2
DOC. ND. 202/-105335 r ; @ \
\ 555·40'13"£ \
--- 2W67' 382,242 SF

8.78 ACRES
---- IV,,. , \I. / ------ f
o
0 ,,..
,,..
·o· - - -- - - ,- -
, I
�,IQ !�
I Cc
- � �12
---1� � � !lJ
�s: � ,!
,�
cf, � '@ fl)
,: §
-......_
/
✓< ••x-,,.. \ ', '1-c�
1, i-109,, ,,..,,.. c�1, i'" I ------
,-;'\ / \ ff>. 1t1S•dl- / ff>.1< o\ii-"
j 1- --
•\�,, , 9e'",,..,,.. e-"' - - -
/ ' �l/ \ 'v/ FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE {TYP) / j / \ j � SJ�1�·�9�i,y_@2_ l -"IJ-!..."ti!'.!.:!): (R) j PARCEJ.. 2 j 0 ...., /
/ \
/ I \; /--® -- C © - fJ' --, (}) / 25-PM-34
/
_l1 -cJ· �-- - ,-,-=---'2 '� �L2 I ., "'-- -- - L1 I ; WHISTLER . 0c• LJ® ',Ni!�".1'1.f:E_@l : - WAJ> \ <;P ,_ - -�- --- - - -- - - - _POINT OF -- @N487�s_a..,,
� - / � \ '1l- BEGINN/NG-r ----_
i ,,..,,. � \ '"c> I
I ,,..,,. � \ .,,.o
I
. ,,..,,. c;;.

I
11 *..a. \ "&,
�\ � . C'lo I i EXHIBIT 118
11 I

PARCEL 'C'
8-PM-23
•��I� PLAT TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
_.
i
�
� ...
• CML ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING •
620 12th Street Modesto, G4 95354
(209) 524-3525 Phone (209) 524-3526 Fax

PREZONING TO CG
LYING IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 4,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO MERIDIAN

STOCKTON SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CALIFORNIA
JOB:

DATE:

SCALE:

DRAWN:
40'
I
,
4)
I
J20-2582
�/9/2021
1"=150'
TM
CHKO: RG
SHEET 1
\
--
....

OF 1 ....

Attachment E
1214
EXHIBIT "A"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON
ALL that certain real property, situate in the South one-half of Section 4, Towns ip 2 North, Range 6 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, described as follows:

BEGINNING at the Northerly corner of Parcel 1 as shown on that certain Parcel Map filed for record in Book 25 of Parcel Maps, at Page 34, San Joaquin County Records, said Northerly corner being also on the Southwest line of a 60-foot wide Irrevocable ffer of Dedication for the extension of Grider Way as shown on said map;

1. thence South 41 °
43'20" West 9.00 feet along the Northwest line of said
to a point on the Southerly right-of-way line of Whistler Way (78-feet wid thence along said Southerly right-of-way line the following four (4) cours s

2. leaving said Northwest line North 48°
16'40" West 99.80 feet to the begi ning of a
curve concave to the South, having a radius of 1961.00 feet;

3. Northwesterly 42.20 feet along the arc of said curve, through a central a 01°13'59";

4. North 49°
30'39" West 28.71 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to he South, having a radius of 3461.00 feet;

5. Northwesterly 428.93 feet along the arc of said curve, through a central ngle of 07°06'03" to a point on the West line of Parcel "D" as shown on that cert in Parcel Map filed in Book 8 of Parcel Maps, at Page 23, San Joaquin County Re ords;

6. thence along said West line North 01 °07'55" East 64.87 feet to the North est corner of said Parcel "D";
thence along the North line of said Parcel "D" the following two (2) cours s

7. North 87°
53'27" East 138.20 feet;

8. North 86°
20'27" East 149.15 feet to the point of intersection of said North line of Parcel "D" and the West line of Parcel Four, as described in Gift Deed, re orded December 24, 1998, as Instrument No. 98154296, San Joaquin County ecords;

9. thence South 55°
40'13" East 219.67 feet to the'point of termination of the Northeast line of said Parcel "D", said point being on the South line of sai Four and the Westerly corner of Parcel Seven, as described in said lnstru No. 98154296;

Attachment F 1215

10. thence South 89°
07'28" East 910.17 feet along the North line of said Pa eel Seven and Parcel Six, as described in said Instrument No. 98154296 to point on the Southwest line of Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way;

11. thence South 23°
17'56" East 97.96 feet along said Southwest right-ofand the Southerly extension thereof to the point of intersection of said right-of-way line and the Southeast right-of-way line of Lower Sacrame to Road, said point being Southeasterly 40.00 feet distant at right angles from th centerline of said Lower Sacramento Road;

12. thence South 41°
40'42" West 578.82 feet along said Southeast right-of- ay line and parallel with said centerline to the beginning of a curve concave to t e Southeast, having a radius of 2415. 00 feet;

13. thence Southwesterly 208. 95 feet along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 04°
57'27" to the point of intersection of said Southeast right-of- ay line and the Southeasterly extension of the Southwest line of the property de cribed in that certain Resolution filed for record April 28, 1983 as Instrument Num 83029652, San Joaquin County Records;

14. thence along said Southeasterly extension and Southwest line North 48°
16'40" West 569.17 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.

Containing 519,753 square feet (11.93 acres), more or less.

A bearing of South 41 ° 40' 42" West for the centerline of Lower Sacramento Roa as shown on that certain Record of Survey filed in Book 38 of Surveys, at Page 11 , San Joaquin County Records, was used as a basis for all bearings. Distances show are ground distances.

All as shown on EXHIBIT "B'' attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. �G,&11�£ Rien Groenewoud, P.L.S. 6946

Attachment F 1216
4o/ f,7/21
\ \
/
/
/
\

LINE TABLE CURVE TABLE

LINE BEARING LENGTH CURVE RADIUS BEARING LENGTH
L1 S41 '43'20"W 9.00' C1 1961.00' 07'13'59" 42.20'
L2 N48'76'40"W 99.80' C2 2415.00' 04'57'27" 208.95'
L3 N49'30'39"W 28.77'
L4 N01'07'55"E 64.87'
L5 N87'53'27"E 138.20'
L6 N86'20'27"E 149.15'
L7 S23'17'56"E 97.96'
\
(J) LINE NUMBER; SEE LEGAL DESCR/PTlON \ /11.- / \
--� /
/
r
/
---
(
�
K �
l.c)
,"#-
C)
:,,-,_
//(
/ \
/
\
"'-."- - - - ..l.
������� @ �
! UIH/STLER
���� •l>c�'j-,-
• ,_,
- ·--
, .
,\-�-,_�� � \u /
> -WA y....- .,
,,
, �,�/
I 6 " N33"23'1B"E (R).
l.
2"" I -- t.;f>N4s•15'4o"w
'-./'/
' _.... '�------
� '{:!I I
' ....- '
I
! ....-
\ �
I
�
ij \ o .L __ (\ �o R i(
,
---��3 -=
(\�
��;
��(\�
�
�
�
��-------------f1--:.��
��,---II
�t ·�� \ -;..··� / 25-PM-34 j l � , .L -=i- I I I
i
l
�
� I
�
t
�
�
r4���
• CML ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • PLANNING•
620 12th street Modesto, C4 95354
... (209) 524-3525 Phone (209) 524-3526 Fox
EXHIBIT 118
11 ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF STOCKTON
LYING IN A PORTION OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SECTION 4,
TOWNSHIP 2 NORTH, RANGE 6 EAST, MOUNT OIABLO MERIDIAN

STOCKTON SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CALIFORNIA
JOB: J20-2582
DATE: 9/13/2021
SCALE: 1 n=15Q'
DRAWN: M
CHKO: RG
SHEET 1
Of 1
...
....

Attachment F
1217
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 1

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW DRAFT

ANNEXATION REPORT

WHISTLER WAY ANNEXATION
ANNEXATION FILE NO. ________
Client Review Draft
September 16, 2021

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT INFORMATION
This report provides background information and analysis in support of the proposed Whistler Way annexation to the City of Stockton. The report addresses annexation compliance with applicable San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) rules and regulations, describes the plan for provision of City services to the annexation area, analyzes the fiscal effects of the annexation, and documents the availability of adequate potable water supply to the project. The contents of this document are as follows:

1.0 Introduction and Project Information

2.0 Consistency of Proposed Annexation with LAFCo Policy

3.0 City Services Plan for Proposed Annexation Area

4.0 Fiscal Effects of Proposed Annexation

5.0 Availability of Adequate Water Supply
The Whistler Way Annexation project proposes the annexation of six parcels of land totaling 8.76 acres into the City of Stockton (City), along with the rights-of-way of the site frontages on Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road. The proposed annexation area, hereinafter referred to as the “subject site,” is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and Grider Way (see attached figures). The existing Stockton city limit line is the northern boundary of the subject site. The parcels constituting the subject site are identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs) 070-140- 10, -11, -34, and -35; 070-560-47; and 070-570-13. Only two acres of APN 070-140-35 are proposed for annexation to the City. Two of the parcels, APNs 070-140-11 and 070- 140-34, have each been developed with a commercial building; the other parcels are vacant.

The subject site is currently within the land use jurisdiction of San Joaquin County; it has a County General Plan designation of Agriculture-Urban Reserve and County zoning designations of C-C (Community Commercial) and AU-20 (Agriculture-Urban Reserve).

The subject site is designated Commercial in the City of Stockton General Plan, as is some of the surrounding area. The subject site is within the City of Stockton's existing Sphere of Influence and 10-year planning horizon, as designated in the City’s Municipal Service Review adopted in 2020.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1218
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 2
The City has received and is processing an application for annexation, pre-zoning, and subsequent development of the subject site. The project proposes to pre-zone the subject site as CG – Commercial, General. These approvals, which would take effect upon annexation of the subject site to the City, would permit proposed development of a selfstorage facility on 7.26 acres of the subject site. The facility would have 570 storage units and an office/onsite manager’s residence, associated on-site utility services and site improvements, and off-site street and utility improvements. The existing Grider Way will be renamed Whistler Way. Proposed pre-zoning and development are consistent with the existing Commercial designation under the City’s General Plan. The City is currently preparing an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the project in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

2.0 CONSISTENCY OF PROPOSED ANNEXATION WITH LAFCO POLICY

REQUIREMENTS
The Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000 (California Government Code Section 56000 et seq.) provides LAFCo with its authority, procedures, and functions. The Act gives LAFCo power to “approve or disapprove with or without amendment, wholly, partially or conditionally,” proposals concerning the formation of cities and special districts, annexation or detachment of territory to/from cities and special districts, and other changes in jurisdiction or organization of local government agencies.

Criteria for project consistency with the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Act are identified in California Government Code Section 56337 and shown below. The following sections of this report provides information in support of each of these findings for the proposed annexation as summarized below.
1) Lands within the annexation area are planned for urban uses in the Stockton General Plan.

As documented in Section 1.0, the subject site is designated “Commercial” in the City of Stockton General Plan and is adjacent to the Stockton city limits. 2) The project is located within the City of Stockton Sphere of Influence and 10-year development timeframe.

As documented in Section 1.0, the subject site is within the City’s Sphere of Influence and 10-year planning horizon, per the City’s recently adopted Municipal Service Review.
3) The project proposes an orderly and logical boundary for annexation and is contiguous to the City limits.

As noted above, the subject site is in a developing urban area with existing commercial development, and it is designated for commercial development. the proposed annexation would permit a logical extension of existing ongoing development in the northern Stockton region.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1219
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 3
4) The project creates a logical extension of the City boundaries and can be served by existing infrastructure.

As discussed in Section 1.0 and the above findings, the subject site is adjacent to the City boundary and represents a logical extension of those boundaries. All required City services and utilities are available to the subject site, as described in Sections 3.0 and 5.0.

3.0 CITY SERVICES PLAN
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 56653, the San Joaquin LAFCo requires that any application for a change of organization or reorganization be accompanied by a plan for providing services. The plan must include the following information:
(a) An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory.
(b) The level and range of those services.
(c) An indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the affected territory.
(d) An indication of any improvements or upgrading of structures, roads, sewer or water facilities, or other conditions the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory if the change of organization or reorganization is completed.
(e) Information with respect to how those services will be financed.

The following City Services Plan meets the above requirements (a) through (d) with respect to annexation of the subject site. The subject site would require some extension of existing City services, including public safety and utilities. Overall, existing public services, with improvements proposed as part of the project, would be adequate to serve the subject site and planned industrial development. The proposed level and range of services to be provided are described in more detail below. The design and construction of required infrastructure improvements, both on- and off-site, will be the responsibility of the project developers, as required by project conditions of approval and subject to engineering approval by the City. Information with respect to how those services will be financed is provided in Section 4.0, which will meet requirement (e) above.

The City of Stockton provides a full range of municipal services. These municipal services include public safety (police, fire), sanitation (solid waste disposal, sanitary wastewater, and stormwater utility), potable water utility, community development, library, parks and recreation, and general administrative services. Public safety and general services will be extended to the subject site upon annexation. Utility services will be provided upon completion and connection of required on-site and off-site improvements.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1220
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 4

3.1 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE
Water systems in the City of Stockton Metropolitan Area use a combination of treated surface water and pumped groundwater from City wells. Stockton water purveyors include the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities Department (COSMUD), California Water Service Company, and San Joaquin County maintenance districts. Should the annexation be approved, water service to the subject site would be provided by COSMUD. COSMUD provides water to service areas in North Stockton and South Stockton; the subject site is in the North Stockton service area.

Sources of water provided by COSMUD include purchases from the Stockton East Water District (SEWD) and the Woodbridge Irrigation District, groundwater wells, and surface water from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta through the City’s Delta Water Supply Project (DWSP). Water from DWSP is treated at the Delta Water Treatment Plant, operated by COSMUD and located north of Stockton. SEWD water is treated at its water treatment plant east of Stockton. The City currently plans to use 6,000 acre-feet per year from SEWD.

By agreement, the City purchases 6,500 acre-feet of water per year from the Woodbridge Irrigation District for municipal and industrial use. This water will augment the DWSP supply.

The DWSP provides most of the potable water supply for the City’s service areas, including North Stockton. The Delta Water Treatment Plant currently treats an average of 15 million gallons per day (mgd) of water, and it currently has the capacity to treat 30 mgd. The projected 2035 capacity of the DWSP is 90 mgd, with an annual production of approximately 50,000 acre-feet per year. The City’s supply from the San Joaquin River is curtailed annually from February through June of each year due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife.

The DWSP has the objectives of reducing groundwater overdraft and of protecting the underlying groundwater basin from further saltwater intrusion and water quality degradation. Extensive groundwater pumping in the past has caused movement of the saline waters eastward from under the Delta. With the DWSP now online, the City uses less groundwater in wet and average years, but it increases groundwater use in dry years to make up for reductions in surface water deliveries. The City has determined that the sustainable groundwater yield is 0.75 acre-feet per acre per year, equivalent to a groundwater yield of approximately 50,000 acre-feet per year. Based on available monitoring data, extraction rates appear to be below the maximum sustainable yield of the groundwater basin.

The North Stockton water system distributes water from the DWSP, SEWD, and groundwater wells. The DWSP provides most of the service area’s drinking water. There are eight groundwater wells in active service (Okubo pers. comm.), with pump design flows ranging from 550 to 2,800 gallons per minute. The entire system is one pressure zone with the lowest ground surface elevation (5 feet above mean sea level) on the western side of the system and the highest elevation (35 feet above mean sea level) on the eastern side of the system. Additionally, there are two 3-million-gallon storage tanks near 14-Mile Slough and three 3.4-million-gallon storage tanks near the Northwest Reservoir. These tanks deliver water through 18-, 24-, and 30-inch diameter mains. A 48-inch diameter Attachment G- City Service Plan 1221
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 5
pipeline connects the North Stockton system to SEWD. The remainder of the distribution system consists primarily of mains of 12 inches diameter or less.

The subject site is currently within the service area of the North Stockton potable water system, and an existing water line runs along Grider Way. The two developed parcels are already connected to the City’s water system; connection by the currently vacant parcels would occur upon annexation. On-site lines would be installed to provide water to future development, and the on-site water system would connect to the Grider Way line. The developer(s) will comply with plumbing, metering, and other water conservation measures in effect in the City of Stockton, including the policies in the City's current Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP).

The existing water connection fee charged by COSMUD for non-residential development varies from approximately $2,264 to $156,828 or higher, depending on the size of the water meter. For purposes of the fiscal analysis shown in Section 4.0, a water meter size of one inch is assumed, as only the office/on-site manager’s residence building is anticipated to use water. The connection fee for a one-inch meter is approximately $4,266. In addition, a DWSP surface water fee is applied, ranging from approximately $5,441 to $290,178 or higher, again depending on water meter size. For a one-inch water meter, the DWSP fee would be $5,441. Water connection fees are payable upon issuance of a building permit.

In addition, the City bills the property owner for water service on a monthly basis.

The City is requiring an additional water connection for the subject site for firefighting purposes. The proposed connection would have an eight-inch meter. The connection fee for an eight-inch meter is approximately $158,828. The DWSP surface water fee also would apply to this connection. For an eight-inch water meter, the DWSP fee would be approximately $290,178. As with the other proposed connection, these fees are payable upon issuance of a building permit.

3.2 WASTEWATER
The proposed development site is not presently connected to a wastewater collection and treatment system and contains no individual wastewater disposal systems. Should the annexation be approved, the subject site would be served by the City’s existing wastewater and collection system currently installed in Grider Way.

The Stockton Regional Wastewater Control Facility (RWCF) provides primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater gathered from the city as a whole. The RWCF has a designed flow capacity of 55 mgd and had an average daily flow rate of 27 mgd in 2017. Treated effluent from the RWCF is dechlorinated and discharged to the San Joaquin River. The RWCF operations are regulated by the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, through Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R5-2015-0142, NPDES CA0079138.

The City’s wastewater collection system is divided into 14 designated subareas or “systems.” Upon annexation, the subject site would be incorporated within Wastewater Collection System No. 10. Pump stations are located throughout Stockton and are integral Attachment G- City Service Plan 1222
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 6
to the sanitary sewer collection system. Most of the pump stations discharge to pressure lines that convey flow directly to the RWCF or to an available gravity sewer.

An existing sewer main is located along Grider Way, and the two developed parcels are already connected to the City’s wastewater system. Connection by the currently vacant parcels would occur upon annexation. The subject site is within the North of Calaveras Sanitary Connection fee area. The existing sewer connection fee in that area is $3,634 per single family residential unit equivalent. For this project, the sewer connection fee, based on a residential unit equivalency of 1.38 units, would be approximately $5,015 (see Exhibit 7 for how estimate was derived). Sanitary sewer connection fees are payable upon issuance of a building permit. As with potable water, the City bills the property owner for sanitary sewer service on a monthly basis.

3.3 STORM DRAINAGE
The City of Stockton is situated just east of the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, a low-lying region of sloughs and channels connecting local waterways with the Suisun and San Francisco Bays. The city and surrounding areas depend on creeks, rivers, and sloughs to collect and convey storm runoff to the San Joaquin River and the Delta. The primary watercourses include the San Joaquin River, Bear Creek, Mosher Slough, Five Mile Slough, Fourteen Mile Slough, Calaveras River and Stockton Diverting Canal, Smith Canal, and French Camp and Walker Sloughs. The subject site is within the Bear Creek watershed. Bear Creek, approximately 900 feet south of the subject site, is tributary to the San Joaquin River.

The Stormwater Utility Division of COSMUD operates and maintains 620 miles of storm drains, 72 pump stations, and over 100 discharge pipes that collect and route runoff from the streets and gutters to local rivers, creeks, and sloughs. Most storm drains and pump stations have adequate capacity to collect stormwater. Runoff within the Bear Creek watershed is collected in three major storm drains with diameters of 36, 42, and 84 inches, and it is pumped into Bear Creek from these drains at Interstate 5, Iron Canyon Court, and Thornton Road, respectively. Within the City, the Bear Creek channel is up to 175 feet wide and has a capacity of 7,600 cubic feet per second. Bear Creek has capacity to carry the 100-year peak runoff from City lands within its banks and has the additional capacity to carry runoff from developing lands south of Eight Mile Road, an area within which the subject site is located.

Stormwater discharges from the Stockton urbanized area contain substantial urban runoff pollution. Five Mile Slough, Mosher Slough, the Stockton Deep Water Channel, and the San Joaquin River are listed as “water quality impaired”. The City of Stockton provides local management of the federal and state programs for implementation of the Clean Water Act’s NPDES program. Stormwater quality is governed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Order No. R5-2016-0040, NPDES No.

CAS0085324. The regulations of the City’s Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance and the Storm Water Management and Discharge Control Ordinance establish local oversight of the general permit system and effective control of storm water quality impacts. The design of drainage facilities is regulated by the City. The City Department of Public Works Standard Specifications Section 71, Sanitary Sewers and Storm Sewers, and Section 79, Attachment G- City Service Plan 1223
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 7
Storm Water Basins, cover much of the design criteria for these facilities. The City’s General Plan commits the City to maintaining the existing storm drain and flood management facilities.

The City’s General Plan includes policies that ensure and require that stormwater drainage planning be addressed in conjunction with new development, including requirements for inclusion of Best Management Practices (BMPs) that reduce stormwater runoff pollution and runoff volume. Any costs associated with new facilities must be met or offset by the project, including costs of storm water BMP maintenance.

3.4 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
City ordinance requires collection of municipal refuse. This ordinance would apply to development on the subject site upon annexation. The City’s franchise haulers provide solid waste collection in Stockton. The waste provider bills the property owner monthly for collection service, based on the size of collection container utilized. Industrial waste – including construction and demolition debris and manufacturing waste – may only be collected and hauled with a valid City-issued Industrial Waste Collector Permit. There are currently two waste haulers permitted to collect and transport industrial waste within the City of Stockton limits: Republic Services and Waste Management. The subject site is within the Waste Management collection boundaries.

Solid waste generated in the City of Stockton is disposed at existing County-owned and private landfill facilities. There is currently no shortage of space available at the Countyowned landfills, with one estimated to have available capacity to 2048 and another to 2082.

Recent information regarding individual jurisdiction diversion of solid waste from landfills is no longer available. The most recent information from 2006 indicates that about 33% of the City of Stockton’s solid waste is landfilled while the remainder is handled by one or more of the City’s waste diversion (recycling) programs. To increase construction and demolition debris recycling, the City adopted a Construction and Demolition Debris Ordinance in 2008; the ordinance requires construction and demolition contractors to divert from the landfill 50% of all waste generated, by weight, and to document these reductions in written reports filed with the City. Upon annexation of the subject site, construction associated with future development will be subject to this ordinance.

3.5 NATURAL GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND CATV SERVICES Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) currently provides both natural gas and electricity services to the vicinity of the subject site. Local telephone service is provided by AT&T, and cable television service is provided by Comcast. These systems are obligated to extend service to the subject site on request. Developer/utility company costsharing agreements to provide these services will be executed as required.

3.6 POLICE PROTECTION
Law enforcement services to the subject site currently are provided by the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department. Upon annexation, law enforcement would be the responsibility of the Stockton Police Department. The Police Department serves the area Attachment G- City Service Plan 1224
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 8
within City limits, covering more than 65 square miles. As of February 2021, the Police Department consists of 486 sworn officers, 47 police telecommunicators, and 179 civilian staff. The staffing level is determined each year by the Stockton City Council and is subject to change as the Council, City Manager, and Chief of Police determine the needs of the city.

The service area is organized into six Community Policing Districts, one of which (Bear Creek) is adjacent to the subject site. It is the Police Department’s policy to respond to all emergency calls within three to five minutes. Currently, there are no adopted service levels for the Police Department; however, it is understood that a higher level of service may be required as population increases. The project would receive law enforcement service during construction as well as upon completion of development.

Capital costs of Police Department expansion are accounted for by the City’s Public Facilities Fee program. The City of Stockton has adopted a Public Facility Fee for police facilities payable upon issuance of a building permit. For warehouse/low density land uses, the adopted fee is $62 per 1,000 square feet. However, as part of the City’s Economic Stimulus Package currently in effect, this fee has been reduced by 50 percent. Assuming 100,850 square feet of future self-storage development on the subject site, an estimated $3,126 in Public Facility Fees for police facilities would be generated. Additionally, in November 2014, Stockton’s voters approved Measure A, which instituted a three-quarter cent (0.75%) sales tax to provide funding for law enforcement, crime prevention services, and other essential City services.

3.7 FIRE PROTECTION
The subject site is currently within the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District, which serves 8,084 acres within unincorporated San Joaquin County throughout the northern Stockton area. The Lincoln Fire Protection District currently provides fire protection services under contract with the Stockton Fire Department.

Upon annexation, the subject site would be detached from the Lincoln Fire Protection District, and fire protection would be the direct responsibility of the Stockton Fire Department. The Fire Department provides fire protection, fire prevention, paramedic emergency medical, and other related services to all areas of the City of Stockton, as well as on a contract basis to the Lincoln, Eastside, Boggs Tract, and Country Club Fire Districts. Specific services provided include fire hydrant maintenance, training, fire dispatch, hazardous materials intervention, and weed abatement services. The Fire Department currently serves an area of about 86 square miles and has about 181 total personnel.

The Fire Department has twelve stations located throughout the greater Stockton metropolitan area. The closest station to the subject site is Station 14 at 3019 McNabb Street, approximately 1.7 miles to the west. Station 14 is equipped with one engine and one grass rig. The standards for response time for all stations are between three and four minutes for a structural fire call and four minutes for an emergency medical service call.

Average response times from Station 14 to both types of calls have been approximately six minutes.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1225
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 9
To provide adequate fire protection services, future development will coordinate with the Stockton Fire Department during planning and design phases to ensure site access, response time, sprinkler requirements, water system design, and hydrant placement are acceptable. Improvements to the City of Stockton water system will also be constructed in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code fire flow standards, and hydrants will be placed in accordance with Fire Department standards. As noted in Section 3.1 above, the City will require an additional water connection to the subject site for firefighting purposes.

In addition, the Stockton Fire Department participates in the California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement. This agreement allows the City to share resources with all fire department agencies in San Joaquin County and request assistance from the County fire districts when additional services are required. The existing mutual aid agreement allows the City and County agencies to share resources when needed. The City currently provides most of the fire services within and around the City limits, since some of the County fire districts have reduced staffing, supply shortages, or operations on a temporary basis.

As with police facilities, capital costs of fire station expansion are accounted for by the City’s Public Facilities Fee program. The City of Stockton has adopted a Public Facility Fee for fire stations payable upon issuance of a building permit. For warehouse/low density land uses, the fee is $54 per 1,000 square feet. As part of the City’s Economic Stimulus Package currently in effect, this fee has been reduced by 50 percent. Using the same development assumptions for police facility expansion, approximately $2,723 in Public Facility Fees for fire stations would be generated by future development.

3.8 SCHOOLS
The subject site is within the boundaries of the Stockton Unified School District (SUSD).

The nearest public school to the subject site is Podesta Ranch Elementary School, a SUSD facility located approximately one-quarter mile to the west. SUSD experiences overcrowding in its schools, but it collects required school impact fees and coordinates with residential developers to ensure that sufficient capacity exists within the school system to accommodate residential-related student generation.

The subject site is proposed for commercial development and would not result in residential-related student generation. Nevertheless, the project would contribute development impact fees from commercial development in accordance with State law.

Based on a non-residential development rate of $0.61 per square foot, the project would generate approximately $61,519 in total school impact fees. Project development will contribute to these fees in conjunction with building permit issuance.

3.9 PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
The City of Stockton provides park and recreational services. The nearest City park to the subject site is Dentoni Park, approximately one mile to the southwest. Dentoni Park, a 9.5- acre neighborhood park, is equipped with picnic tables, a barbeque facility, a tot lot, horseshoe pits, two tennis courts, a softball field, and a basketball court. The Stockton General Plan establishes policies and standards for the size and siting of parklands.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1226
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 10
San Joaquin County also provides parks and recreational facilities available to the public.

The nearest County park is Oak Grove Park, a regional park located along Eight Mile Road approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the subject site. Oak Grove Park contains 10-acre Oak Grove Lake, a nature center, two nature trails, and a youth campground.

No new residential development is proposed on the subject site. Public Facility Fees for parklands are only assessed on new residential development; commercial development is exempt from parkland fees. However, commercial development would be subject to the payment of Public Facility Fees for community recreation centers. For warehouse/low density land uses, this fee would be $23.25 per 1,000 square feet. As part of the City’s Economic Stimulus Package currently in effect, this fee has been reduced by 50 percent.

Based on this, the project would generate approximately $1,172 in Public Facility Fees for community recreation centers. As with other Public Facility Fees, these fees would be payable upon issuance of a building permit.

3.10 LIBRARIES
The public library system in the Stockton area is operated jointly by the City and San Joaquin County. The nearest branch to the subject site is the Margaret K. Troke Library at 502 West Benjamin Holt Drive, approximately 2.3 miles to the south. A new library and community center is under construction in northeast Stockton adjacent to Ronald McNair High School on West Lane.

Capital costs of library expansion are accounted for by the City’s Public Facilities Fee program. The City of Stockton has adopted a Public Facility Fee for libraries payable upon issuance of a building permit. For warehouse/low density land uses, the fee is $56 per 1,000 square feet. As part of the City’s Economic Stimulus Package currently in effect, this fee has been reduced by 50 percent. An estimated $2,824 in Public Facility Fees for libraries would be generated by future development on the subject site.

3.11 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC FACILITIES/OTHER GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES Two public roads are adjacent to the subject site, both currently maintained by San Joaquin County. Grider Way is along the southwest boundary of the subject site. This two-lane road is paved but does not have street improvements such as curb, gutter, and sidewalk along the subject site frontage. Lower Sacramento Road abuts the northeast corner of the subject site. This road is an arterial road with two lanes on the segment adjacent to the subject site.

It is paved and has curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements on both sides of the road.

Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road intersect southeast of the subject site. A fourway traffic signal has been installed at the intersection.

Proposed development on the subject site will require street improvements along the Grider Way frontage, including curb, gutter, and sidewalk. These improvements would be designed and constructed by the developer pursuant to City of Stockton standards. No such improvements would be necessary for the Lower Sacramento Road frontage, which already has been improved.

With increased vehicular traffic resulting from the development of the subject site, the need for road maintenance will increase. Future development will be responsible for payment of Attachment G- City Service Plan 1227
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 11
adopted Public Facility Fees for street improvements and traffic signals to fund intersection and roadway segment improvements identified in the City's Street Improvement Plan. The City requires that these fees be paid prior to building permit issuance. For warehouse/low density land uses, street improvement fees are $931.50 per 1,000 square feet. However, as part of the City’s Economic Stimulus Package currently in effect, this fee has been reduced by 50 percent. Therefore, the project would generate approximately $46,971 in street improvement fees. Traffic signal fees are $30.75 per 1,000 square feet, so the project would generate approximately $3,101 in traffic signal fees. The traffic signal fee is required even though a traffic signal already exists at the Grider Way/Lower Sacramento Road intersection.

A Regional Transportation Impact Fee (RTIF) also will be required of future development on the subject site. The RTIF’s objectives are to generate funding from new development projects that impact the Regional Transportation Network and to integrate these funds with federal, state, and other local funding to make transportation improvements identified in the RTIF Program. Proposed improvements in the RTIF Program that are in the vicinity of the subject site include Eight Mile Road interchange improvements at both Interstate 5 and State Route 99, widening of both Lower Sacramento Road and Eight Mile Road, and improvements at the intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and Thornton Road. The Regional Transportation Impact Fee for the proposed commercial development is $460 per 1,000 square feet, so future development would generate approximately $46,391 in RTIF.

Measure K was passed by voters in 1990 and extended for another 30 years by voter approval in 2006. This measure instituted a 1/2-cent sales tax dedicated to transportation improvement projects in San Joaquin County. Measure K funding is allocated to specific projects including improved highways and local streets, new passenger rail service, regional and interregional bus routes, park-and-ride lots, new bicycle facilities, and railroad crossings by the San Joaquin Council of Governments. San Joaquin County and cities within the County share thirty-five percent (35%) of the sales tax revenue for local street repair. The local jurisdictions receive an annual funding allocation for local street repairs and safety and operations improvements. The local share of Measure K funds is distributed by formula based primarily on the City’s proportionate share of the overall County population. Since the proposed annexation and development would not change the City’s population, there would be no change in Measure K revenue directed to the City.

4.0 FINANCING OF CITY SERVICES AND FISCAL EFFECTS
California Government Code Section 56653 requires that the required plan for services to a subject site include information on how the extension services would be financed. For the purposes of this analysis, services extensions are classified as 1) public road improvements and utility services such as water, wastewater, storm water, electrical, gas and communication systems that require construction of new pipelines, power lines, pump stations or other physical facilities needed to extend urban services to the subject site, and 2) general City services such as police and fire protection would, generally speaking, be provided without major improvements to capital facilities. These concerns are addressed in the following Sections 4.1 and 4.2, respectively.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1228
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 12

4.1 FINANCING OF ROADS AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
Improvements needed to extend public road and utility services to the site would be constructed in conjunction with the development of proposed commercial storage structures, access, parking and other on-site improvements. These improvements would include off-site improvements to the frontage of Grider Way, any improvements to water and wastewater lines and electrical, gas and communication lines, if required.

As prescribed in the project conditions of approval, the project will be responsible for design and construction of required improvements to City roads and utility systems in accordance with adopted City standards. Unless improvements are deferred per a specific agreement with the City, they will be constructed prior to occupancy of the project site.

The costs of extending electrical, gas and communication facilities will be borne by the project and the responsible franchise utility as prescribed in adopted rules and regulations.

Costs of operating public infrastructure for the benefit of the project will be met through existing monthly service fee systems established by the City and franchise utilities.

Long-term capital improvement needs associated with new development, including the proposed project, are met through the City's adopted Public Facility Fees, which provide for expansion of City offices, libraries, community recreation centers, fire and police stations, street improvements, park land, surface water resource development improvement, air quality, and related administrative costs as these needs are identified.

Similarly, the City has also adopted development fees for sanitary sewer and water connections, traffic signals, and street trees, and various local benefit district fees. Public Facility Fees and connection fee payments are required when building permits are issued, in accordance with the City’s adopted fee schedule that is annually updated to keep pace with infrastructure and public facility costs. As a result, the City operates from year to year with a fee structure that reasonably anticipates and collects fees sufficient to meet capital improvement needs associated with new development.

Estimated Public Facility Fees and connection fees for proposed development of the selfstorage facility are summarized in Table 1 below. As noted, some of the Public Facility Fees have been reduced by 50 percent as part of the City’s Economic Stimulus Package currently in effect. The two parcels within the subject site that are already developed and connected to the City’s water and wastewater systems would not be subject to these fees.

For more information on how the estimates were developed, please see the attached Exhibit

7. Attachment G- City Service Plan 1229
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 13
TABLE 1

ESTIMATED PUBLIC FACILITY AND CONNECTION FEES

FOR PROPOSED SELF-STORAGE FACILITY

FEE CATEGORY ESTIMATED PROJECT FEES
City of Stockton Public Facility Fees
Community Recreation Center $1,172
City Office Space $1,286
Fire Stations $2,723
Libraries $2,824
Parkland $0
Police Stations $3,126
Regional Transportation $46,391
Street Improvement $46,971
Traffic Signal $3,101
Subtotal $107,594
City of Stockton Utility Connection Fees
Sewer Connection $5,015
Water Connection (2 connections) $161,094
Delta Water Supply Project (2 connections) $295,619
Subtotal $461,728
TOTAL CITY CAPITAL FEES $569,322
Along with the Public Facility Fees and connection fees, the City also collects development-related fees for the following:
• Agricultural Land Mitigation Program (not applicable, as no agricultural land as defined by the City ordinance is within the subject site) • Air quality
• County facilities
• Habitat/Open Space for San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) (no further payment due; SJCOG fees for the site have already been paid) • Surface water for SEWD ($0.228 per square feet of retail/0.60) • Related administrative costs
Table 2 summarizes the estimated development-related fees for the proposed self-storage facility. These also include development impact fees collected by other agencies, such as the SUSD and SJCOG. Exhibit 7 provides more information on how the fee estimates were developed. The two parcels within the subject site that are already developed would not be subject to these fees.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1230
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 14
TABLE 2

ESTIMATED OTHER DEVELOPMENT-RELATED FEES

FOR PROPOSED SELF-STORAGE FACILITY

FEE ESTIMATED PROJECT FEES
Agricultural Land Mitigation $0
Air Quality $40,844
County Facilities $12,405
Surface Water $38,323
Administration $19,902
Subtotal $111,474
School Impact Fees (SUSD) $61,519
Habitat/Open Space (SJCOG) $75,393*
TOTAL OTHER FEES $248,386
* Fee has been paid by project applicant to SJCOG.

4.2 FINANCING OF GENERAL SERVICES
This section describes the anticipated revenues to the City of Stockton, which would be the main provider of services. As noted above, the design, engineering, and construction of these services and infrastructure improvements will be financed by developers of the subject site, subject to approval by the City. This section also analyzes financial impacts on the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District, which currently provides fire protection services to the subject site and from which the subject site would be detached upon annexation to the City.

4.2.1 Estimated Change in Annual Revenue for City of Stockton As a Charter City, the City of Stockton benefits from the same revenue sources as general law cities, as well as a utility user tax. The City receives a portion of the property tax collected within the City limits, and it receives franchise payments from electrical distribution, cable television and solid waste collection franchises. The City operates its public utilities (i.e., water and sanitary sewer) as enterprise functions, and it engages in public recreation activities on a quasi-enterprise basis, subsidized by its General Fund (e.g., golf courses, ice arena, civic auditorium).

The major sources of revenue that will be generated by the proposed future development for the City of Stockton General Fund are summarized in Table 3 below. Revenue estimates were generated primarily on a person-served basis, which accounts for project-related population and employee growth. Please see the attached Exhibits 1-6 for more information regarding the derivation of Table 3 calculations. More detailed information regarding specific sources of revenues is provided below.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1231
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 15
TABLE 3

ESTIMATED RECURRING CITY OF STOCKTON GENERAL REVENUES

RESULTING FROM ANNEXATION AND BUILDOUT OF THE SUBJECT SITE

CATEGORY AMOUNT
Property Taxes
Secured Property Tax $3,910
Unsecured Property Tax $391
Property Transfer Tax $161
Property Tax in-Lieu of Motor Vehicle Fees $5,110
Sales Tax
Direct Sales Tax $44,901
Other Revenue Sources
Utility Users Tax $2,036
Franchises $984
Business Licenses $2,956
Document Transfer $51
Investment Proceeds $119
Fire Contracts $278
Code Enforcement $207
Charges for Services $187
Fines & Forfeitures $30
Revenues from Other Agencies $193
Licenses & Permits $34
Sale of Fixed Assets $1
Indirect Cost Allocations $350
Refunds & Reimbursements $14
Rents/Leases/Concessions $181
TOTAL $62,094
Property Tax
Property tax rates are set at 1% of assessed property value. The potential property tax revenues resulting from the project were based on information provided by the project applicant and the current City/County Revenue Sharing Agreement for annexations. As shown in Exhibit 3, the estimated assessed valuation on the subject site with both proposed and existing development is $4,443,507.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1232
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 16
Based on information from the San Joaquin County Auditor-Controller, approximately

59.5% of every property tax dollar from the subject site is allocated among the Stockton Unified School District, San Joaquin Delta Community College, and the State’s educational fund. This leaves an “available share” of approximately 40.5% of the overall property tax revenue, which is divided between the County General Fund, the Lincoln Rural County Fire District, and other County agencies. This division of the property tax is the basis for estimating the property tax the City will receive upon annexation and development of the subject site (see Exhibit 3).

Secured Property Tax
Based upon information from the San Joaquin County Auditor-Controller, upon annexation, approximately 8.8% of total property tax revenue from the subject site would go to the City. Based on this and the anticipated valuation of the subject site once fully developed, the secured property tax amount that would be collected by the City would be approximately $3,910 (see Exhibit 3).

Unsecured Property Taxes
Unsecured property taxes are derived from property that is not real estate such as business equipment, boats, aircraft, and possessory interests. For this analysis, it is assumed that the unsecured property tax is 10% of the secured property tax and that the amount of unsecured property tax the City would receive after annexation and development of the subject site would be $391 (see Exhibit 3).

Other Property Taxes
Property transfer taxes are taxes charged as a percentage of the value of property that has a transfer of title. It is estimated that the amount of property transfer tax the City would receive after annexation of the subject site would be $161. Exhibit 3 provides details on the property transfer tax estimate.

In 2004, the State Legislature and the Governor agreed to a swap of city and county vehicle license fee revenue for an additional share of property tax revenue to be provided to the local governments. This Property Tax in-Lieu of Motor Vehicle Fees is a substantial source of revenue based on property taxes. It is estimated that the amount of property tax in-lieu of motor vehicle fees associated with the subject site would be $5,110. See Exhibit 3 for development of this estimate.

Sales Tax
The current sales tax rate in the City of Stockton is 9.00%, with the City receiving 2.25% of taxable sales, 1.25% of which is a result of measures approved by City voters (Measure A – 0.75%, Measure W (police and fire) – 0.25%, Measure M (library and recreation) –

0.25%). A portion of the subject site has been developed with commercial uses, so it is expected that sales tax revenues would be generated by this development. A rough estimate of the sales tax revenue generated from this existing development is provided in Exhibit 4.

The estimated direct sales tax revenue is $44,901. It is expected that sales tax revenue from the proposed self-storage facility would be minimal, since few taxable items are expected Attachment G- City Service Plan 1233
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 17
to be sold. Therefore, no estimate of sales tax revenue was developed for the self-storage facility.

Utility User Tax
A utility user tax is levied against utility charges for all non-public users of gas, electric, water, telephone, and cable television services. This tax is 6% of a customer’s monthly bill.

As noted in Table 3 above, development on the subject site, both existing and future, would generate an estimated $2,036 annually in utility user tax revenues. See Exhibits 1 and 5 for how the estimate of utility user tax revenue was developed.

Franchise Tax
Franchise taxes are levied upon the providers of natural gas, electric, refuse removal and cable television service. The franchise tax, which is 2% for most utilities and 3% for cable TV, is levied upon the provider rather than the customer and is charged against all utility revenues. Development on the subject site would generate approximately $984 in franchise tax revenue annually (see Exhibits 1 and 5).

Business License Tax
The City of Stockton assesses a business registration fee and a license tax on any person engaged in or carrying on any profession, trade, calling, occupation, or business in the City.

Beyond a registration fee of $24, businesses are assessed at varying rates based typically on their gross receipts. However, as gross receipts information for the annexation area is unknown, business license tax revenues were estimated using City budget information and estimated number of employees. Development on the subject site is estimated to yield an annual revenue of $2,956 (see Exhibits 1 and 5).

Other Revenue Sources
The City has a variety of other revenue sources, which are listed in the City’s budget. These include document transfer fees, licenses and permits, fines and forfeitures, rents/leases and concessions, sales of fixed assets, investment proceeds, and revenues from fire service contracts and from other agencies, among others. Exhibits 1 and 5 list these other sources.

Not all these revenue sources would be associated with annexation and development of the subject site. However, to simplify the analysis, revenues from each of these sources have been estimated based upon the service population anticipated to be on the subject site at full development. Estimated revenues from these other sources would be $1,645.

4.2.2 Estimated Change in Annual Expenditures for City of Stockton As discussed in Section 4.1, immediate and future capital costs of the project would be met through developer improvements to public road and utility systems and through payment of the City’s Public Facility Fees and connection fees. The project is commercial in nature and would not result in increases in the resident population of Stockton, with concurrent costs in providing City services. However, the addition of project-related employees may contribute to the “service population” of the City, which would contribute to service costs.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1234
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 18
Preliminary work done for the IS/MND indicates that impacts of proposed future development on the City’s water, sanitary sewer, and storm drainage systems would be less than significant. The City’s sanitary sewer system has adequate capacity to accommodate additional wastewater from the project, and existing sewer lines in the area can carry the anticipated flow. The City’s water system has sufficient supplies to satisfy potential project demand, and no new supplies would need to be obtained. In accordance with City requirements, the project developer would construct the necessary improvements and connections to the City’s water and sewer systems and storm drainage facilities to accommodate runoff in accordance with City standards. Expenses to operate the required City utilities to the subject site are expected to be minimal and would be covered by monthly utility billing to the project activities.

The IS/MND also concluded that impacts of the proposed development on public services provided by the City, primarily fire and police protection, would be less than significant.

Expenses to provide City fire and police services to the subject site are also expected to be minimal. While the project would place an incremental demand for City fire and police services, no new or expanded services would be required because of the project. In fact, the Stockton Fire Department already provides service to the subject site, under contract with the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District. Future capital costs for these services would be met through payment of Public Facility Fees.

The proposed annexation would include approximately 350 feet of Grider Way right-ofway. Improvements would be installed along the north side of Grider Way and are likely to include curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street lighting. The frontage improvements would be funded by the developer. However, the annexed right-of-way of both Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road (the latter approximately 240 feet) would increase costs to the City for ongoing maintenance. A rough approximation of the increased maintenance cost was obtained by dividing the total miles currently maintained by the City of Stockton into total street maintenance cost, then applying the results to the segments to be annexed.

According to the FY 2021/22 budget for the City of Stockton, the City maintains 770 miles of streets at a cost of $22,687,975. Based on these figures, the additional cost to maintain the annexed streets would be approximately $3,851 annually. Road maintenance costs are met from a variety of sources.

The project is not expected to result in additional costs for schools or parks and recreation, as the project would not increase the resident population. Nonetheless, the project would contribute to future school and community center capital needs through payment of school mitigation fees and community center Public Facility Fees.

An approximation of maximum potential increases in City services costs associated with the project was calculated by dividing total general fund expenditures by the City service population, and by multiplying that factor by the increase in service population on the subject site. The per-unit cost factor would be $653.81. The expected increase in service population would be 23 (see Exhibit 2). Therefore, potential service costs to the City would be approximately $15,038. See Exhibit 8 for a development of the expenditure estimate for the subject site.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1235
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 19

4.2.3 Overall Impact of Project on City Budget
As indicated in Table 3 and in Exhibit 6, existing and proposed future development of the subject site is expected to generate approximately $62,094 in annual revenues to the City.

With estimated annual expenditures of $15,038, the City would have adequate annual revenues to provide services to the subject site. In addition, as indicated in Tables 1 and 2 and in Exhibit 7, proposed future development would generate approximately $680,796 in one-time Public Facility Fees and connection fees to the City to cover expenses associated with new or expanded public facilities and services. Additional fees would be paid to SUSD and SJCOG.

In summary, the City would be expected to expect to receive revenues from both existing and proposed development of the subject site that would exceed the expenses incurred in providing City services. Thus, at the project level, the City would likely operate at a budget surplus.

4.3 PROPERTY TAX IMPACT TO THE LINCOLN FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Based on information provided by the County Auditor-Controller, the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District currently receives approximately 22.8 percent of the general one-percent property tax levy from the subject site. This currently generates approximately $958 of property tax revenue for the Fire District. Upon annexation and development of the subject site, the assessed valuation of the site would increase substantially. However, as a part of the annexation process, the subject site would be detached from the Fire District, and the Fire District would no longer receive tax revenue from the site.

LAFCo policy dictates that adverse fiscal impacts resulting from detachments from special districts or annexations that fail to provide adequate mitigation of the adverse impact on the district will not be approved would apply to this proposed detachment. It is expected that the City and the Fire District will reach an agreement that recognizes the revenue impacts on the Fire District resulting from the proposed annexation. LAFCo may determine an appropriate temporary mitigation, if needed, and impose that temporary mitigation to the extent it is within its powers.

As previously noted, the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District currently provides fire protection services through a contract with the Stockton Fire Department. Therefore, while the Fire District would lose some revenue with the annexation, existing services provided within the Fire District boundaries would not change, as the Stockton Fire Department already provides such services and would continue to do so under the terms of the contract.

5.0 AVAILABILITY OF ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY
As noted, California Government Code Section 56668(l) requires an assessment of the timely availability of water supplies for an annexation area. The UWMP for the City of Stockton’s water system, updated in 2020, assessed the reliability of its water supply for its service area, which includes the subject site. The UWMP includes a description of the Attachment G- City Service Plan 1236
Whistler Way Annexation Report Page 20
water supply sources, projected water use, and a comparison of water supply water demands during normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years. The definitions of the three water year scenarios, as described by the State Department of Water Resources, are provided below.

1. Average year is a year, or an averaged range of years in the historical sequence that most closely represents median water supply availability to the agency.

Normal and average are used interchangeably within the Department of Water Resources guidebook.

2. Single dry year is the year with the lowest water supply availability to the agency.

3. Multiple dry year is the lowest average water supply availability to the agency for a consecutive multiple-year period for a watershed since 1903. For the City of Stockton, a five-year period was used in the analysis.

As part of the 2020 UWMP, a Water Supply Reliability Assessment was conducted to determine the reliability of the City’s water supply for all three water year scenarios from 2025 to 2045. Under the normal water year scenario, water supply would exceed demand by 36,596 to 47,322 acre-feet per year. Under the single dry water year scenario, supply would exceed demand by 13,656 to 24,022 acre-feet per year. Under the multiple dry year scenario, supply would exceed demand in a range from 12,456 acre-feet per year in the fourth dry year in 2040 and 2045 to 44,196 acre-feet per year in the fifth dry year in 2030.

A Water Master Plan Update prepared by the City in 2021 indicated that commercial activities use approximately 1.62 acre-feet of water per year. While water usage can vary greatly among commercial activities, for this analysis it is assumed that commercial water usage on the subject site would be the same. This is considered a conservative assumption, as self-storage facilities generally do not use as much water as other types of commercial activities. Based on the assumed water use, water demand from development on the subject site, both existing and proposed, would be approximately 14.2 acre-feet per year. Again, this is considered a conservative estimate; actual water use would likely be less. When compared with the difference in water supply and demand described above, the City would have sufficient water supply for proposed future development on the subject site, even in multiple dry years. Water can be readily provided from existing sources, without the need to acquire additional supplies or water rights.

It should be noted that the demand figures used in this analysis do not consider the amount of water that may be saved by active and passive water conservation programs, which are described in the City Service Plan. The COSMUD has met, and expects to be able to continue to meet, annual water demands within its service area during differing hydrologic periods with surface water, groundwater, water conservation, and other potential water supplies such as non-potable supplies from local communities, raw surface water from local irrigation districts, and water from active groundwater storage projects.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1237

FIGURES
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1238
BaseCamp
Figure 1
BaseCamp Environmental REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
San Diego Imperial
Orange
Riverside
San Bernardino
Ventura Los Angeles
Santa Barbara
Kern San Luis
Obispo
Inyo
Tulare
Kings Monterey
Fresno
San
Benito
Mono
Madera
Mariposa
Tuolumne
Calaveras
Amador
El Dorado
Sacramento
Alpine
Santa
Clara
San
Joaquin
Contra
Costa
Merced
Marin
Napa
Yolo
Solano
Sutter
Lake Colusa Placer Yuba
Sonoma
Stanislaus Alameda
Santa Cruz
San Mateo
San Francisco
www.csac.counties.org

PROJECT SITE
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1239
BaseCamp
Figure 2
BaseCamp Environmental Aerial Photo

PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: Google Earth
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1240
Figure 3
BaseCamp Environmental ASSESSOR PARCEL MAP

PROJECT SITE
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1241
Figure 4
BaseCamp Environmental PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA & PREZONING SOURCE: Project Applications

WHISTLER WAY
070-140-11
070-140-34
070-570-35
070-570-35
070-570-13

LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD
070-140-10
070-560-47

PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA

PROPOSED PREZONING AREA
(CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL)
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1242
Figure 5
BaseCamp Environmental SITE PLAN
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1243

EXHIBITS
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1244
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

CITY OF STOCKTON GENERAL FUND REVENUE SUMMARY
I. CITY DEMOGRAPHIC DATA
2020 Estimated City Population [1] 318,522
2020 Estimated City Employees [2] 121,350
2020 Persons Served Population [3] 391,332
II. CITY REVENUE SOURCES
General Fund Revenue Type City Budget [4]
Recurring or
Non-Recurring Multiplier Type Multiplier
Property Tax $38,416,000 Recurring AV/square foot NA
Utility Users Tax 34,342,000 Recurring Persons Served $87.76 Sales and Use Tax 94,587,000 Recurring NA NA
Franchises 16,595,630 Recurring Persons Served $42.41
Business Licenses 9,695,000 Recurring Per Employee $79.89 Document Transfer 852,000 Recurring Persons Served $2.18 Hotel/Motel Tax 2,648,000 Non-Recurring NA NA
In-Lieu of Motor Vehicle Fees 26,791,495 Recurring AV Proportion NA Motor Vehicle License 200,000 Recurring Per Capita $0.49 Investment Proceeds 2,011,693 Recurring Persons Served $5.14 Fire Contracts 4,691,240 Recurring Persons Served $11.99 Code Enforcement 3,498,413 Recurring Persons Served $8.94 Charges for Services 3,150,079 Recurring Persons Served $8.05 Fines & Forfeitures 501,694 Recurring Persons Served $1.28 Revenues from Other Agencies 3,253,496 Recurring Persons Served $8.31 Licenses & Permits 577,014 Recurring Persons Served $1.47 Sale of Fixed Assets 22,000 Recurring Persons Served $0.06 Districts/Area of Benefit Contribution 0 Non-Recurring Persons Served NA Misc. Other Revenues (171,781) Recurring Persons Served $0 Indirect Cost Allocation 5,904,220 Recurring Persons Served $15.09 Refunds & Reimbursements 230,309 Recurring Persons Served $0.59 Rents/Leases/Concessions 3,052,448 Recurring Persons Served $7.80 Loan Repayment 0 Recurring Persons Served NA
TOTALS $250,847,950 -- -- --
NOTES:
[1] California Department of Finance, E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1-1-2020. [2] San Joaquin County Forecast Summary, Center for Business and Policy Research, Eberhardt School of Business, University of the Pacific, July 7, 2016.
[3] Assumes City population plus 60% of employees.
[4] Source: City of Stockton Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget.

AV – Assessed Valuation; NA – Not applicable
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1245
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

LAND USE AND DEMOGRAPHICS SUMMARY
I. RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
Residential Land Uses Number of Units Persons per Household [1] Residential Population Residential 0 3.26 0
II. NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USES
Non-Residential Land Uses Square Feet Number of Employees Commercial – Proposed 100,850 3[2]
Commercial – Existing 20,000 34[3]
III. PROJECT DEMOGRAPHICS
Residential Population 0
Direct Employees 37
Persons Served Population [4] 22
NOTES:
[1] Source: California Department of Finance, E-5 City/County Population and Housing Estimates, 1-1-2020. [2] Based on review of postings on selfstoragetalk.com: “How many employees work at your facility?” Most respondents indicated 2 or 3; larger number used. Review conducted September 8, 2021. [3] Based on factor of one employee per 588 square feet of neighborhood retail (source USGBS). [4] Assumes population plus 60 percent of number of employees.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1246
EXHIBIT 3
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

PROPERTY TAX REVENUE
I. GENERAL PROPERTY TAX ASSUMPTIONS
Pre-Annexation - 1% General Property Tax Breakdown [1]
Public Agency Property Tax Breakdown
County General Fund 17.7%
Lincoln Fire Protection District 22.8%
School districts and other agencies 59.5%
TOTAL 100.00%
Property Tax Allocation Upon Annexation [1]
Public Agency Property Tax Breakdown
County General Fund 31.7%
City of Stockton 8.8%
School districts and other agencies 59.5%
TOTAL 100.00%
II. SECURED PROPERTY TAX ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land Use
Type
Square
Feet
Valuation per
Square Foot [2]
Estimated
Assessed
Valuation
Total Secured
Property Tax
Commercial – Proposed 100,850 $40.00 $4,034,000 $3,550
Commercial – Existing 20,000 - $409,507[3] $360
TOTAL $4,443,507 $3,910
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1247
III. UNSECURED PROPERTY TAX ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land Use
Type
Square
Feet
Unsecured Tax (as %
of Secured Tax)
Total Secured
Property Tax
Total
Unsecured
Property Tax
Commercial – Proposed 100,850 10.00% $3,550 $355
Commercial – Existing 20,000 10.00% $360 $36
TOTAL $391
IV. PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land Use
Type
Square
Feet
Property
Turnover Rate [4]
Property
Transfer Tax to
City [5]
Total Property
Transfer Tax
Commercial – Proposed 100,850 5.00% 0.055% $111
Commercial – Existing 20,000 5.00% 0.055% $50
TOTAL $161
V. PROPERTY TAX IN-LIEU OF MOTOR VEHICLE FEE (MVF) ANALYSIS Nonresidential Land Use
Type
Square
Feet
Total Assessed
Valuation
Property Tax InLieu of MVF per
$1,000 Assessed
Value [6]
Total Property
Tax In-Lieu of
MVF
Commercial – Proposed 100,850 $4,034,000 $1.15 $4,639
Commercial – Existing 20,000 $409,507 $1.15 $471
TOTAL $4,443,507 $5,110
NOTES:
[1] Source: San Joaquin County Auditor-Controller Office. [2] Source: ISS, “How to Value, Price and Sell Your Facility,” October 1, 2000. Actual values range from $20-80 per square foot; $40 per square foot most common.
[3] Actual valuation from San Joaquin County Assessor’s Office. [4] Based on typical OTA baseline assumptions.
[5] Source: California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11911-11929. [6] Based on City of Stockton Assessed Valuation and In-Lieu of MVF revenue items in City of Stockton Fiscal Year 2019/20 Budget, the most recent fiscal year assessed valuation data are available. See Exhibit 1 for In-Lieu of MVF. * All figures subject to rounding.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1248
EXHIBIT 4
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

SALES TAX REVENUE ANALYSIS
I. DIRECT SALES TAX ANALYSIS
Nonresidential Land Use
Type
Taxable Sales per
Acre [1]
Acres Total Sales Tax
Revenue
Commercial – Existing $29,934 1.5 $44,901
NOTES:
[1] Based on City of Stockton FY 2021/22 sales tax revenue of $94,587,000 divided by 3,160 commercial acres in Stockton (source: 2040 General Plan Update and Utility Master Plan Supplements Draft EIR, June 2018).

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1249
EXHIBIT 5
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

MULTIPLE REVENUE ANALYSIS
General Fund Revenue Type
Revenue Projection
Basis [1]
Multiplier
Factor [2]
Estimated Project
Revenue
Utility Users Tax Persons Served $87.76 $1,948
Franchises Persons Served 42.41 941
Business Licenses Per Employee 79.89 2,956
Document Transfer Persons Served 2.18 48
Motor Vehicle License Per Capita 0.49 0
Investment Proceeds Persons Served 5.14 114
Fire Contracts Persons Served 11.99 266
Code Enforcement Persons Served 8.94 198
Charges for Services Persons Served 8.05 179
Fines & Forfeitures Persons Served 1.28 28
Revenues from Other Agencies Persons Served 8.31 185
Licenses & Permits Persons Served 1.47 33
Sale of Fixed Assets Persons Served 0.06 1
Miscellaneous Other Revenues Persons Served 0 0
Indirect Cost Allocation Persons Served 15.09 335
Refunds & Reimbursements Persons Served 0.59 13
Rents/Leases/Concessions Persons Served 7.80 173
Loan Repayment Persons Served 0 0
TOTAL -- -- $7,420
NOTES:
[1] See Exhibit 2.
[2] See Exhibit 1.
* All figures subject to rounding.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1250
EXHIBIT 6
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

PROJECTED RECURRING GENERAL FUND REVENUE

CATEGORY AMOUNT
Secured Property Tax $3,111
Unsecured Property Tax $311
Property Transfer Tax $161
Property Tax in-Lieu of Motor Vehicle Fees $5,110
Direct Sales Tax $44,901
Utility Users Tax $1,948
Franchises $941
Business Licenses $2,956
Document Transfer $48
Motor Vehicle Licenses 0
Investment Proceeds $114
Fire Contracts $266
Code Enforcement $198
Charges for Services $179
Fines & Forfeitures $28
Revenues from Other Agencies $185
Licenses & Permits $33
Sale of Fixed Assets $1
Miscellaneous Other Revenues 0
Indirect Cost Allocations $335
Refunds & Reimbursements $13
Rents/Leases/Concessions $173
Loan Repayment 0
TOTAL $61,891
NOTES:
[1] See Exhibit 3.
[2] See Exhibit 4.
[3] See Exhibit 5.
* All figures subject to rounding.

NA – information not available
Attachment G- City Service Plan 1251
EXHIBIT 7
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

PUBLIC FACILITY AND IMPACT FEE SUMMARY
(PROPOSED SELF-STORAGE FACILITY)

FEE CATEGORY FEE RATE ESTIMATED PROJECT
FEES
City of Stockton Fees [1]
Agricultural Land Mitigation $10,494/acre of ag land $0 Air Quality $405/1,000 sq. ft. $40,844
City Office Space* $25.50/1,000 sq. ft. $1,286
Community Recreation Center* $23.25/1,000 sq. ft. $1,172 County Facilities $123/1,000 sq. ft. $12,405
Fire Stations* $54/1,000 sq. ft. $2,723
Libraries* $56/1,000 sq. ft. $2,824
Parkland N/A $0
Police Stations* $62/1,000 sq. ft. $3,126
Street Improvement* $931.50/1,000 sq. ft. $46,971
Surface Water $0.228/(sq. ft./0.6) $38,323
Administration (2.5% of total fees above) -- $3,742
SUBTOTAL $153,416
Sewer Connection $3,634/SFU equivalent [2] $5,015
Water Connection 1-inch meter $4,266
Delta Water Supply 1-inch meter $5,441
Administration (3.5% of total fees above) -- $515
SUBTOTAL $15,237
Regional Transportation $460/1,000 sq. ft. $46,391
Traffic Signal $30.75/1,000 sq. ft. $3,101
SUBTOTAL $49,492
TOTAL CITY PUBLIC FACILITY AND IMPACT FEES $218,145
Fees by Other Agencies
School Impact Fees (SUSD) $0.61/square foot $61,519
Habitat/Open Space (SJCOG) $17,363/acre $75,393[3]
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITY AND IMPACT FEES $355,057
NOTES:
[1] Source: City of Stockton FY 2020-21 Fee Schedule.
[2] For warehouse land use >50,000 sq. ft., single-family unit (SFU) equivalent is square footage times 0.01 gallons/day divided by 300.
[3] Fee has been paid by project applicant to SJCOG.
* 50% reduction in adopted fee as part of Stockton Economic Stimulus Package, to be eliminated once nexus study is completed and General Plan is updated.

All figures subject to rounding.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1252
EXHIBIT 8
CITY OF STOCKTON – PROPOSED GRIDER WAY ANNEXATION

ESTIMATED PROJECT EXPENDITURES
I. CITY EXPENDITURES
Program Appropriations City Budget [1]
Police $143,771,046
Fire 50,152,050
Administration 18,762,286
Public Works 17,498,458
Community Services 7,915,150
Economic Development 5,606,034
Capital Improvements 5,000,000
Debt Service 4,174,175
Other Programs 2,978,111
TOTAL $255,857,310
II. PROJECT EXPENDITURE ANALYSIS
2020 City of Stockton Persons Served Population [2]: 391,332 City Expenditures per Person Served: $653.81
Persons Served Population on Subject Site [3]: 22
Total Subject Site Expenditures: $14,384
NOTES:
[1] Source: City of Stockton Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget [2] See Exhibit 1.
[3] See Exhibit 2.
* All figures subject to rounding.

Attachment G- City Service Plan 1253
Whistler Storage LLC
c/o Marlon Bateman
5701 Lonetree Blvd., Ste. 102
Rocklin, CA 95765

NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTICE
TO: Residents
CC: City Of Stockton Community Development Department
Dear Resident,
This notice is being sent to inform you that the property near 681 Grider Way, Stockton, California is proposing to annex into the City of Stockton to permit a self-storage facility and associated onsite improvements (parking, lighting, landscaping). The property currently resides within unincorporated San Joaquin County and is required to annex into the City to receive City water, storm, and sanitary services for the proposed commercial development.

The parcel being annexed is approximately nine acres and is currently designated for Commercial uses by the Stockton General Plan. The proposed annexation will be consistent with the City’s General Plan.

The proposed development and associated use are allowed under the existing and proposed zoning by right.

As part of the annexation process, this notice is being sent to inform you of a meeting that will occur on THURSDAY, OCTOBER 28TH AT 5:00 PM PACIFIC TIME at the [Windmill Homeowners Center] [Elkhorn Golf Club, 1050 Elkhorn Drive, Stockton, CA] to answer any questions you may have about the proposed annexation of this parcel.

If you have any questions, please contact Marlon Bateman at (916) 677-6800.

Best regards,
Marlon Bateman
Attachment H 1254
ResolutionNo. 2022-01-27-0502-01

STOCKTON PLANNING COMMISSION

RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL CERTIFY A MITIGATED

NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO PREZONE
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, 070-14-010, 070-14-011, AND 070-14-034 (P21-0589) TO COMMERCIAL, GENERAL (CG) ZONE Strategic Land Planning (hereafter "Applicant") requests the annexation of six parcels totaling ±8.76-acres. Four of the parcels (APN 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14- 035, and 070-14-010) will be used to develop a new ±100,850 square foot 570-unit personal storage facility with 1,200 square-foot caretakers residential unit located at 692 Grider Way. The proposed personal storage facility requires an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) for processing and will include accompanying drive aisles, parking stalls, landscaping, lighting, and utility services. The proposed annexation also includes two developed parcels (APN 070-14-011 and 070-14-034) adjacent to the Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Way intersection; and
Since the project site is presently located within the County of San Joaquin, Annexation must occur and be preceded by "Prezoning" it through a Zoning Map Amendment; and
Since the 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the project site as Commercial, the Project includes a request to Prezone the site to Commercial, General (CG) Zone, pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan; and
Per CEQA guidelines, it has been determined that the Project involves potential significant effects on the environment. Still, these effects could be reduced to a less-thansignificant level with recommended mitigation measures. A Notice of Intent (NOi) to adopt the CEQA IS/MND was published in The Record on November 15, 2021. Since the review did not require State agency approval, the NOi provided notice of a 20-day public review/comment period on the draft CEQA IS/MND document. Members and other public agencies were allowed to review the draft CEQA IS/MND document. The review/comment period ended on December 6, 2021, with one comment received and incorporated into the final CEQA IS/MND; and
On October 28, 2021, per SMC Section 16.88.025, the Applicant held a neighborhood meeting to present the development proposal and receive feedback.

Mailing notice was provided to property owners within 300 feet of the project site at least ten days in advance. City staff attended the meeting along with the Applicant and two members of the public. Questions were raised at the meeting; however, no formal comment on the Project has been submitted to staff in opposition or support; and Attachment I 1255
On January 27, 2022, the Planning commission held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Section 16.116.040(D), to consider certifying the Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and the proposed Prezoning, at which all times all interested parties had the opportunity to be heard; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOWS:

1. CEQA Document
a. The Project initial study identified potentially significant effects of the Project. The proposed mitigated negative declaration (MND) and initial study were released for public review were determined by the City to avoid or reduce the potentially significant effects to a less than significant level, and, therefore, there was no substantial evidence that the Project as revised and conditioned would have a significant effect on the environment.
b. A Notice of Intent to Adopt the MND (NOi) was circulated for public comment for 20 days (November 15, 2021, through December 6, 2021 ). The NOi was sent to those public agencies that have jurisdiction by law with respect to the proposed project and to other interested parties and agencies. The comments of such persons and agencies were sought.
c. The NOi was published in the Stockton Record, a newspaper of general circulation, and the NOi was posted in the office of the Stockton Community Development Department.
d. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the MND, including the initial study, the revisions and conditions incorporated into the Project, and the comments received during the public review process and the hearing on the Project. The Planning Commission has determined that the MND constitutes an adequate, accurate, objective and complete review of the environmental effects of the proposed project.
e. Based on its review of the MND and on the basis of the whole record, the City Council finds that the MND reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis and that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment.

2. Zoning Map Amendment (Prezone SMC Section 16.116.050):
a. The proposed amendment ensures and maintains internal consistency with general land uses, objectives, policies, programs, and actions of all elements of the General Plan on balance and would not create any inconsistencies with this Development Code; The 2040 General Plan Land Use Map designates the subject site Commercial. Pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Attachment I 1256
Code) of the General Plan, the CG Zone is compatible with the Commercial General Plan Land Use Map designation of Commercial. The proposed Prezone action would not create any inconsistencies with SMC Title 16 (Development Code) since it pertains to the Zoning Map only. The text of Title 16 (Development Code) would remain unchanged under this action.

The proposed Prezone action would further the following General Plan policies:
i. Goal LU-4: Attract and retain companies that offer high-quality jobs with wages that are competitive with the region and state. ii. Policy LU-4.2: Attract employment- and tax-generating businesses that support the economic diversity of the City.
iii. Policy LU-6.2: Prioritize development and redevelopment of vacant, underutilized, and blighted infill areas.
b. The proposed Prezone action will not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the City because the CG Zone designation will, as noted above, be compatible with General Plan Land Use Map designation applicable to the site.
c. The proposed Prezone action complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines because a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and demonstrated that with mitigation, no significant environmental effects would result from either the Prezone action or other related actions constituting the Project.
d. Additional Finding for Zoning Map Amendments. The site(s) would be physically suitable (including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested zoning designation(s) and anticipated land use development(s). (Prior code § 16- 510.050): Based on the information included in the Project MND and the General Plan EIR, the subject site would be physically suitable (including access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested zoning designation and anticipated land use development.

SECTION II. PREZONE CLASSIFICATION

3. The Planning Commission recommends that City Council certify the Grider Personal Storage Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Exhibit 1 ) and adopt the attached Ordinance (Exhibit 2) for a Zoning Map Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit 3, to Prezone Assessor's Parcel Number 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, 070- 14-010, 070-14-011, and 070-14-034, presently located in the County of San Attachment I 1257
Joaquin, State of California, is hereby reclassified, upon annexation to the City of Stockton, to Commercial, General (CG) Zone.

PASSED,APPROVED,andADOPTED --�Ja=n�u=a-��2=7-,�2�0=22�_ ATTEST:

ST�IEOCASIO, SECRETARY
City of Stockton Planning Commission

ANNE MALLETT, CHAIR
✓
City of Stockton Planning Commission
Attachment I 1258
ResolutionNo. 2022-01-27-0502-02

STOCKTON PLANNING COMMISSION

RESOLUTION APPROVING ADMINISTRATIVE USE PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW FOR A NEW PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITY (APPLICATION NO. P21-0589) Strategic Land Planning (hereafter "Applicant") applied for an Administrative Use Permit and Design Review to develop a new ±100,850 square foot 570-unit personal storage facility with 1 ,200 square-foot caretakers residential unit located at 692 Grider Way (APN 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, 070-14-010, 070-14-011, and 070-14- 034). The proposed personal storage facility requires an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) for processing and will include accompanying drive aisles, parking stalls, landscaping, lighting, and utility services. The proposed annexation also includes two developed parcels adjacent to the Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Way intersection; and On December 8, 2021, the Site Plan Review Committee (SPRC) and Architectural Review Committee (ARC) conducted a review of the proposed Project and forwarded a recommendation of approval, and submitted supporting findings to the Director, who concurs with the recommendation; and
Because the Project requires more than one application under the provisions of the Development Code, the applications are being processed concurrently; and On January 27, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and received and considered all evidence on the Retail Commercial Center Project; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON, AS FOLLOW:

The Planning Commission approves the Administrative Use Permit and Design Review application, illustrated in Exhibit 1, and based on the following findings and the Conditions of Approval incorporated herein:

Administrative Use Permit Finding per SMC 16.168.050

1. The proposed use is allowed within the subject zoning district with the approval of a use permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Development Code and the Municipal Code. (§ 16.168.050(A)(1 )); The proposed storage facility is defined as "Personal Storage Facilities (mini storage)," which requires an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) per SMC Section 16.20.020 (Allowable Land Uses) for the proposed CG (Commercial-General) Prezone. As conditioned, the proposed Project meets all city development standards. There are no applicable overlays or specific plans for this site.

Attachment I 1259

2. The proposed use would maintain or strengthen the integrity and character of the neighborhood and zoning district in which it is to be located. (§ 16.168.050(A)(2)); The existing business is located within a predominately industrial area. The Project proposal of the truck wash would be compatible with surrounding uses, and therefore, the use would maintain the integrity and character of the neighborhood and zoning district.

3. The proposed use would be consistent with the general land uses objectives, policies, and programs of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan or master development plan. (§ 16.168.050(A)(3) ); The proposed storage facility will comply with the General Plan and Zoning Code development standards for site coverage, height, setbacks, and design. The proposed design will not negatively affect vehicular circulation, bike paths, or pedestrian circulation.

4. The subject site would be physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed, including the provision of services (e.g., sanitation and water), public access, and the absence of physical constraints (e.g., earth movement, flooding, etc.). (§1 6.168.050(A)(4)); The Project is required to incorporate a variety of design treatments for the purposes of ensuring the development is compatible with the surrounding area and is integrated into the built environment. The proposed facility that complies with the Development Code will be similar in design to other commercial buildings and storage facilities within the area. The proposed personal storage facility would have minimal impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. All storage will be kept indoors, and the entire Project will be screened behind a six and eight-foot tall masonry screening wall.

5. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the proposed land use activity at the location proposed would not endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. (§ 16.168.050(A)(5)); The Project is consistent with all applicable development provisions as the proposed uses are consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. As such, the Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the area or the City's general welfare.

The proposed storage facility will comply with the General Plan and Zoning Code development standards for site coverage, height, setbacks, and design. The proposed design will not negatively affect vehicular circulation, bike paths, or pedestrian circulation.

6. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing, and future land uses on-site and in the vicinity of the subject property. (§ 16.168.050(A)(6)); The Project is consistent with all applicable development provisions as the proposed uses are consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site. As such, the Project will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the area or the City's general welfare. The proposed storage facility will Attachment I 1260
comply with the General Plan and Zoning Code development standards for site coverage, height, setbacks, and design. The proposed design will not negatively affect vehicular circulation, bike paths, or pedestrian circulation ..

7. The proposed action would comply with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines; The requested action complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines because a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and demonstrated that with mitigation, no significant environmental effects would result from construction of the facility or other related actions constituting the Project as the development of the facility will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.

Design Review Findings per SMC 16.120.060

1. The proposed development is consistent with all applicable prov1s1ons of this Development Code and other applicable City ordinances; The Project has been evaluated against all applicable development code standards. Representatives of each department within community development, municipal utilities, and fire preve,ntion have reviewed the Project and have found it to be in compliance with all applicable city ordinances. The Architectural Review Committee has found the Project to be in substantial compliance with provisions of the Stockton City-wide Design Guidelines for Commercial properties.

2. The general design considerations, including the character, quality, and scale of design, are consistent with the purpose/intent of this chapter and the Guidelines and other design guidelines that may be adopted by the City; The SPRC and ARC have reviewed the site plan and building elevations, materials, and design in a comprehensive manner. The proposed Project will incorporate high-quality, durable materials according to the design review guidelines.

3. The architectural design of structures and their materials and colors are visually compatible with surrounding development. Design elements (e,.g., awnings, exterior lighting, screening of equipment, signs, etc.) have been incorporated into the Project to further ensure its compatibility with the character and uses of adjacent development and/or between the different types of uses in a mixed-use development; The corporate design is visually compatible with other commercial developments near the project site. The Project has incorporated screening from the adjacent homes and other equipment using decorative landscaping elements.

4. The location and configuration of structures are compatible with their sites and with surrounding sites and structures and do not unnecessarily block views from other structures or dominate their surroundings: the site design and development pattern are consistent within the context of the surrounding developments. There are no protected views that would be blocked from the proposed development.

5. The general landscape design, including the color, coverage, location, size, texture, and type of plant materials, provisions for irrigation, planned maintenance, and Attachment I 1261
protection of landsqape elements have been considered to ensure visual relief, to complement structures, and to provide an attractive environment; the Project has incorporated landscaping into the overall design, using landscaping to highlight and enhance entrances, screen unattractive elements, and provide shade and beautification to internal parking lots. A detailed irrigation plan will be approved by the building department prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.

6. The design and layout of the proposed Project will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future development and will not result in vehicular or pedestrian hazards; The Stockton Design Guidelines establish criteria for residential and non-residential development to achieve a product of high-quality design that is compatible with the character of the surrounding area. The Project is required to incorporate a variety of design treatments for the purposes of ensuring the development is compatible with the surrounding area and is integrated into the built environment. The proposed architecture and site improvements are consistent with the Development Code will be like surrounding commercial and storage uses within the area.

7. The building design and related site plans, including on-site parking and loading, has been designed and integrated to ensure the intended use will best serve the potential users or patrons of the site; The site plans have been evaluated by all departments within Community Development have reviewed the site plan for the Project. On-site parking and loading have been incorporated per development code standards. The engineering department and Public works have evaluated the layout to ensure adequate circulation for patrons. Frontage improvements have been incorporated into the design and shall be installed by the Applicant prior to construction of the facility.

8. Special requirements or standards have been adequately incorporated, when applicable, into the building and/or site design (e.g., American Disabilities Act regulations, historic preservation, mitigation measures, open space, utilities, etc.). (Prior code § 16-515.060) ADA requirements per the Uniform Building Code have been evaluated by the building department and incorporated in the final design.

Emergency vehicle access and other standards have been evaluated by fire prevention, and all comments have been incorporated into the final design. Individual departments will review other standards during plan check to ensure compliance with all other standards.

Conditions of Approval- Administrative Use Permit
On-Going

1. This approval authorizes a Personal Storage Facility located at 629 Grider Way (APN 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, and 070-14-010) consistent with the Applicant's Project Description and approved Project Plans shown as Exhibit 1 on the Planning Commission Resolution to approve the Administrative Use Permit.

2. Compliance with these conditions is mandatory. Failure to comply with these conditions is unlawful, constitutes a public nuisance, and is subject to the Attachment I 1262
remedies and penalties identified in the Stockton Municipal Code (SMC), including but not limited to monetary fines and revocation or modification of said Administrative Use Permit.

3. The Administrative Use Permit shall become valid ten days after the date of approval unless the action is appealed, and shall be maintained by both the property owner and the business operator and shall be made available upon request by a City official.

4. This Administrative Use Permit shall be void unless the approved use or construction is initiated within 12 months of the permit being issued and diligently pursued to completion. An extension may be requested in accordance with SMC section 16.168.0B0(C).

5. The property owners, developers, and/or successors-in-interest (ODS) shall be responsible for and defend, indemnify and hold the City harmless for any and all fees and costs associated with any legal challenge to the approvals for this Project or its related environmental determination.

6. If applicable, the subject development must comply with the requirements of the San Joaquin Council of Government's San Joaquin County Multi-Species Habitat Conversation and Open Space Plan and demonstrate such compliance to the City prior to the submittal of a grading permit for the Grider Way Storage Facility project.

7. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, the Project shall be subject to all applicable feasible mitigation measures identified in the certified Final Mitigated Negative Declaration and in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the 2040 General Plan
Planning

8. The ODS shall install a solid masonry wall along the boundary of the project in accordance with SMC 16.80.200.C (Perimeter Wall) prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the main storage structures.

9. No signage is approved with this Administrative Use Permit. The ODS shall submit signage plans to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to issuance of a Building Permit for installation of any off-site signs.

10. The ODS shall install directional signage and restripe the parking areas for two existing buildings. All proposed signage and parking improvements shall comply with Title 16 ( development code) of the Stockton Municipal code.

11. The ODS shall submit for a Lot Line Adjustment (LLA) or Parcel Map to reconfigure the existing property lines around the proposed structures. The LLA or Parcel Map must be completed and recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for construction of the main storage structures. Comply with all applicable Federal, State, County, and City codes, regulations and adopted standards and pay all applicable fees.

Engineering
Attachment I 1263

12. ODS shall dedicate right-of-way (R/W) to the City to provide their half of the street section per the SMC 16.72.060. The limit of R/W dedication shall be from Lower Sacramento Road to the westerly property line, sufficient to include the necessary width for the intersection receiving lane/transition lane from Lower Sacramento Road and 36 feet half street section measured from the roadway centerline.

13. Roadway facility shall be designed as a collector Street Non-Residential (Std.Dwg. R-8) with minimum design requirements per City Std. Dwg. R14.

14. ODS shall design and install off-site improvements along the Grider Way, from Lower Sacramento Road to the westerly property line per the SMC 16. 72.070 and City Standards. Off-site improvements shall include but are not limited to curb, gutter, sidewalk, bicycle lane, ADA curb-ramp, pavement widening, driveways, landscaping, and street lighting prior to receiving any Certificate of Occupancy for any building permit. Construction frontage Improvement shall seamlessly tie to the existing frontage improvements.

15. No driveway access will be allowed to the site from Lower Sacramento Rd.

16. ODS shall file an application for a street name change with the San Joaquin County to change Grider Way to Whistler Way prior to the public hearing for LAFCO consideration of the project site annexation. Should the ODS be unsuccessful in receiving approval of street name change from the County prior to site annexation into the City limits, the ODS shall file an application with the City to change the street name.

17. Driveway access to/from site shall be limited to right in and right out turning movements, unless ODS prepare a traffic operational and safety analysis demonstrating to the City's satisfaction that full turning movement access could be permissible.

18. The ODS shall submit subdivision master plans for water, storm and sanitary sewer service. These plans shall show all on-site and off-site utilities necessary to provide water, storm and sanitary sewer utility service. These plans shall be approved by the Assistant Director of Municipal Utilities prior to the submittal of any improvement plans.

Public Works

19. Access control upon Grider Way will be dictated by the designation of street classification.

20. Offsite improvement plans will be designed per City standards.

Municipal Utilities Department (MUD):

21. MUD will require a Stormwater Quality Control Plan (SWQCP) and WDID number for the State approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) at the time of building permit submittal.

22. MUD will also require the applicant to comply with the terms and conditions of the City will serve letter.

23. Dedicate stormwater easement to the City of Stockton.

Attachment I 1264

24. there must not be any direct water connections to the existing 30" water transmission main. A 12" water service main must be constructed with this project and the irrigation connections can be made to this main.

Stockton Fire Department

25. Fire Department will need to review existing fire hydrant locations with the project design team for Grider Way, Whistler Way and Lower Sacramento Road. Additional public fire hydrants may be required pending further review of public improvements along the streets noted that are being annexed into the city. Fire hydrant spacing shall be at every 300-feet apart to meet city standards for commercially developed areas.

26. Access to the existing buildings that will be included in this annexation shall meet the California Fire Code, Chapter 5 for requirements. Specifically, perimeter access to each building shall be reviewed and evaluated with the project design team. Any security fencing and gates shall be equipped with Fire Department key boxes and key switches. Automated gates will require a Fire Department key switch. "Click-to-Enter" requirements shall also be applied to this development.

27.AII existing buildings being annexed into the city will require a minimum 12-inch address sign on the building in a conspicuous location to be seen from the public street.

28. Prior to construction, the applicant shall obtain City of Stockton Fire Department approval for all matters subject to local control under the Grider Way Storage Facility Act and Stockton Municipal Code (e.g., fire hydrant locations outside of the project boundary).

Outside Agency

29. The ODS shall provide the Community Development Department (COD) a copy of the completed Air Impact Assessment Application for Indirect Source Review (ISR). Confirmation of San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) approval shall be submitted to COD staff prior to issuance of an Encroachment Permit to extend utilities to the approved site plan.

Conditions of Approval- Design Review Specific

30. This approval authorizes the plans included as Exhibit 1 (Project Plans).

31.Comply with all applicable Federal, State, County, and City codes, regulations, and adopted standards, and pay all applicable fees.

32. The property owners, developers, and/or su·ccessors-in-interest (ODS) shall be responsible for the City's legal and administrative costs associated with defending any legal challenge of the approvals for this Project or its related environmental document.

33. In order to minimize any adverse financial impact on the City of Stockton (COS) associated with development and/or use of the subject site, the ODS agrees that it will not challenge or protest any applicable fees associated with the Attachment I 1265
development of the site, but if such fees are amended or modified, the ODS agrees to pay such fees as they may be amended or modified from time to time.

PASSED,APPROVED,and ADOPTED __ Ja_n_u_a_�_2_7_,_2_02___ 2 ANNE �T, rn,AR
City of Stockton Planning Commission
ATTEST:

STEPHANIEO��·SI � � SECRETARY
City of Stockton Planning Commission
Attachment I 1266
Resolution No.

STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL

RESOLUTION CERTIFYING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR THE GRIDER STORAGE PROJECT LOCATED AT 692 GRIDER WAY AT ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, 070-14-010, 070-14-011, AND 070-14-034 39 (APPLICATION NO. P21-0589)
Strategic Land Planning (hereafter “Applicant”) requests the annexation of six (6) parcels totaling ±8.76-acres. Four (4) of the properties (APN 070-56-047, 070-57-013, 070-14-035, and 070-14-010) will be used to develop a new ±100,850 square foot 570-unit personal storage facility with 1,200 square-foot caretaker’s residential unit located at 692 Grider Way. The proposed personal storage facility requires an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) for processing and will include accompanying drive aisles, parking stalls, landscaping, lighting, and utility services. The proposed annexation also includes two (2) developed parcels (APN 070-14-011 and 070-14-034) adjacent to the Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road intersection; and Since the 2040 General Plan, Land Use Map designates the project site as Commercial, the Project includes a request to Prezone the site to Commercial, General (CG) Zone, pursuant to Table 2-1 (General Plan Relationship to Development Code) of the General Plan; and
Per CEQA guidelines, it has been determined that the Project involves potential significant effects on the environment. Still, these effects could be reduced to a less-thansignificant level with recommended mitigation measures. A Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the CEQA IS/MND was published in The Record on November 15, 2021. Since the review did not require State agency approval, the NOI provided notice of a 20-day public review/comment period on the draft CEQA IS/MND document. Members and other public agencies were allowed to review the draft CEQA IS/MND document. The review/comment period ended on December 6, 2021, with one comment received and incorporated into the final CEQA IS/MND; and
On October 28, 2021, per SMC Section 16.88.025, the Applicant held a neighborhood meeting to present the development proposal and receive feedback.

Mailing notice was provided to property owners within 300 feet of the project site at least ten days in advance. City staff attended the meeting along with the Applicant and two members of the public. Questions were raised at the meeting; however, no formal comment on the Project has been submitted to staff in opposition or support; and On January 27, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, pursuant to Stockton Municipal Code (SMC) Section 16.116.040(D), to consider the proposed Prezoning, at which all times, all interested parties had the opportunity to be 1267
heard. At the meeting, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval to the Stockton City Council; and
On March 22, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the application, in compliance with SMC Section 16.88.040, at which point all persons wishing to be heard were provided such opportunity; now, therefore,

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF STOCKTON AS FOLLOWS:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated by this reference.

2. Based on its review of the entire record herein, the City Council proclaims, a. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared for the project per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
b. The MND identified potential environmental impacts which could occur from the development of the project and, where feasible, the application of mitigation measures that would reduce the impacts to a level of less than significant.
c. All other potentially significant effects were identified and paired with feasible mitigation measures to reduce them to less than significant levels.

3. Based on its review of the entire record herein, including March 22, 2022, City Council staff report, all supporting, referenced, and incorporated documents, and all comments received, the City Council certifies the Grider Storage Project Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program as shown in Exhibit 1.

4. The City Manager is authorized to take all necessary and appropriate steps to carry out the purpose and intent of this resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED March 22, 2022 .

KEVIN J. LINCOLN II
Mayor of the City of Stockton
ATTEST:

ELIZA R. GARZA, CMC
City Clerk of the City of Stockton
1268
FINAL
INITIAL STUDY/
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR THE
WHISTLER WAY ANNEXATION
Stockton, CA
January 27, 2022
Prepared for:

City of Stockton
Community Development Department
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Prepared by:

BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.
802 W. Lodi Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1269
ii
FINAL

INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

WHISTLER WAY ANNEXATION
JANUARY 27, 2022
The Whistler Way Annexation Project proposes annexation of six parcels totaling 8.76 acres to the City of Stockton, along with adjacent road right-of-way. The annexation area would be pre-zoned to the City of Stockton CG (Commercial General) zoning district.

These actions would permit development of Upon annexation, the project proposes to develop 7.26 acres as a self-storage facility totaling ten buildings, 570 storage units and 100,850 square feet of floor area. The project site is located at the intersection of Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road in unincorporated San Joaquin County, adjacent to the City of Stockton. This Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) describes the potential environmental effects that would result from project approval and development.

The City of Stockton, which is the “lead agency” for the project, prepared and processed the IS/MND in accordance with the requirements of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines. A Public Review Draft IS/MND was prepared and made available for local public review from November 17, 2021 through December 6, 2021. No substantive comments related to the content or processing of the IS/MND were received by the City. One comment letter from the Auburn Rancheria requested cooperation in the implementation of the required IS/MND cultural resource mitigation measures. No responses to public review comments are required.

In parallel with the public review process, the City of Stockton also provided notification of the project under AB 52 to 13 tribal representatives including the Auburn Rancheria, the Wilton Rancheria and the Northern Valley Yokuts. Only the Wilton Rancheria responded to the notice, requesting consultation on the project. The City opened consultation with the Auburn Rancheria and the Wilton Rancheria on December 27, 2021, but the City received no reply was received to the initiation of consultation.

Followup calls were made to the tribes on January 18, 2022 with no response.This Final IS/MND includes a copy of the Public Review Draft IS/MND and appendices as well as documentation related to the conduct of the public review process, which is shown on the following pages. The Final IS/MND will be presented to the Stockton Planning Commission and City Council for adoption in conjunction with project consideration and approval. Subsequent to City approval, the IS/MND will be used by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission in its consideration of the project.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1270

CITY OF STOCKTON

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
345 N EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON, CA 95203

NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION

AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
Notice is hereby given that the City of Stockton has prepared an Initial Study (IS) of environmental effects and intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan (MMRP) for the Whistler Way Annexation project. The City of Stockton is the Lead Agency for this project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The subject project is the annexation, pre-zoning and development of six parcels totaling 8.76 acres to the City of Stockton, including two developed parcels, along with adjacent street right-of-way for Grider/Whistler Way.

The project includes construction of a self-storage facility of ten buildings with a total of 570 storage units and an office/onsite manager residence. The project will include improvement of the project site frontage on Grider/Whistler with additional pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk.

The IS/MND analyzes the potential environmental effects of the project in accordance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. Based on this analysis, the IS/MND finds that the project will not involve any significant environmental effects, provided that the mitigation measures described in the IS/MND are implemented. The project proponent has agreed to the mitigation measures, and these measures will be included in a Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan to be adopted by the City of Stockton in conjunction with the IS/MND and approval of the project. There are no sites identified under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code located on or near the project site.

Copies of the IS/MND are available for public review at the Stockton Permit Center at the address shown below and at the City’s website:
http://www.stocktonca.gov/government/departments/communityDevelop/cdPlanEnv.html The City will accept public and agency comments on the IS/MND during a 20-day review period that will begin on November 17, 2021 and end on December 6, 2021. Comments may be submitted by mail or e-mail as shown below:

Stockton Permit Center
Attn: Matt Diaz, Planning Manager
345 N El Dorado St
Stockton, CA 95202
[email protected]
At completion of the public review, the Stockton Planning Commission will consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the IS/MND and the MMRP, and approval of the proposed project.

Subsequent notifications will be sent for those hearings consistent with State Law and local requirements.

William Crew
Director of Community Development
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1271
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND
1272
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND
1273
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND
1274

MONARES GEORGE BENITO II & KAREN

PHANTHA
854 SCHMIDT CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

UNION PACIFIC, CORPORATION
1400 DOUGLAS ST STOP 1640
OMAHA, NE 68179

UNION PACIFIC, CORPORATION
1400 DOUGLAS ST STOP 1640
OMAHA, NE 68179

ASHLEY LANE LP
PO BOX 659
LINDEN, CA 95236

RUBINO FRANK TRUSTEE
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

HAGUE, KON HWA TR
3194 SALIDA WAY
CAMERON PARK, CA 95682

RUBINO FRANK TRUSTEE
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

RUBINO FRANK TRUSTEE
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

RUBINO FRANK TRUSTEE
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

RUBINO FRANK TRUSTEE
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

RUBINO FRANK TRUSTEE
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

ORIMO, ROSE M TR
PO BOX 692714
STOCKTON, CA 95269

QUESSENBERRY CAROLINE M TR
1166 FREMONT WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95818

QUESSENBERRY CAROLINE M TR
1166 FREMONT WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95818

QUESSENBERRY CAROLINE M TR
1166 FREMONT WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95818

QUESSENBERRY CAROLINE M TR
1166 FREMONT WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95818

STOCKTON CITY OF
400 EAST MAIN 4TH FL
STOCKTON, CA 95202

LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
1305 E VINE ST
LODI, CA 95240

BOLINA, JAG & JOTI
1212 PRAHSER AVE
STOCKTON, CA 95209

RUBINO FRANK
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

RUBINO FRANK
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

WINDMILL PARK OWNERS ASSN
24988 BLUE RAVINE RD #108-132
FOLSOM, CA 95630

JOHNSON JENNIFER LEE
10116 RUDDER WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

MADISHETTY SRINIVAS
5695 WELLS LN
SAN RAMON, CA 94582

ORTEGA, HOLLY
866 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

HOLLOWAY, BRIAN TR
204 N SHERMAN AVE
MANTECA, CA 95336

THOMPSON, ORA & RHONDA
912 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

HART SHANE & JAQUES MICHELLE GRUPE TR
13285 WILLOW GLEN RD
STOCKTON, CA 95206

TABARACCI RICHTER TERRI
936 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

JEMERIGBE, MARY ETAL
948 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1275

REESE DERRICK ETAL
960 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

ULANGCO, MELANIE ELLORZA
937 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

FARMER PEGGY A ETAL
855 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

DE CLARO, ERMIE B
PO BOX 684
THORNTON, CA 95686

BRIGHAM MELISSA M
10139 RUDDER WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

HOANG, VINH T
830 SCHMIDT CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

ABDALLA MUNIRA SAIDA ETAL
866 SCHMIDT CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

TACLA, GARY LEE JR & TONYA JOY
10108 RUDDER WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

GAYAGOY, ROMELYNE
10140 TANK HOUSE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

KHAN BUSHRA ETAL
9012 CHERBOURG WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95210
P &
972 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

ASLAMI, SHER
50 VALLEY VISTA CT
FREMONT, CA 94539

CHANDLER, DONALD C JR & JANELLE T
10115 TANK HOUSE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

TREHAN, PROMOD K & MANJU TR
10203 TANK HOUSE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

NGUYEN, AN D
10106 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

DO, NGUYEN & HOA
1017 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

TURNER RUFUS & TRENA
1005 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

WINDMILL PARK OWNERS ASSN
1731 E ROSEVILLE PKWY #100
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

WINDMILL PARK OWNERS ASSN
1776 W MARCH LN SUITE 170
STOCKTON, CA 95207

DAWANG, LOUIS GENE ETAL
274 THORNDIKE WAY
FOLSOM, CA 95630

STOCKTON CITY OF
305 N EL DORADO ST
STOCKTON, CA 95202

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

STOCKTON CITY OF
425 N EL DORADO ST 3RD FL
STOCKTON, CA 95202

QUESSENBERRY CAROLINE M TR
1166 FREMONT WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95818
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1276

QUESSENBERRY CAROLINE M TR
1166 FREMONT WAY
SACRAMENTO, CA 95818

RUBINO FRANK
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

RUBINO FRANK
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

RUBINO FRANK
3608 WOOD DUCK CIR
STOCKTON, CA 95207

PRASAD, JITENDRA C
820 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

DARMAS, LINDA GEORG
832 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

WILLIS WILLIAM & ASHLEY
852 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

MOSE, DOMINGO V & EVA M
949 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

SADLER, SYLVIA M
PO BOX 693074
STOCKTON, CA 95269

CHOY, KONG PANG & MEI PO
125 N MARY AVE #73
SUNNYVALE, CA 94086

WONG, YUK S & SANGDEON N
870 35TH AVE
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94121

DOMINGO, EFRAIN CLARENCE & CHARMAINE
G
867 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

CORREA, ALEISHA A
PO BOX 7768
STOCKTON, CA 95267

CHIONG, KENN & VERA
818 SCHMIDT CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

SHAW VERNELL III & LITTLE LAKEISHA
842 SCHMIDT CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

BALCITA MANUEL JOSEPH III & CHRISTY LYNN
10120 WINDMILL COVE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

DULAY, JASBIR S & SURINDER K ETAL
1002 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

NGUYEN, THOMAS & ANH HOANG GIAO
1014 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

HOLLOWAY, JASON L & MARY E
1026 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

DORAN, JOSEPH E & NATASHA M
10132 RUDDER WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

OLIVAS, GERSON I
10124 RUDDER WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

BRICE, LAWREN A & AISHA L
10103 TANK HOUSE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

PRICE, KENNETH
10127 TANK HOUSE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

CABUAG RICHARD E & SOPHORNA
10139 TANK HOUSE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

ANCHETA, BERNADETTE F ETAL
10151 TANK HOUSE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

VINSON, MICHELLE L
878 SCHMIDT CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

WINDMILL PARK OWNERS ASSN
24988 BLUE RAVINE RD #108-132
FOLSOM, CA 95630

GURM, MANDEEP S
6111 RAYMOND CT
STOCKTON, CA 95212

NGUYEN, MY THAI
1038 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

MARQUEZ LINDA PHAN ETAL
808 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1277

DE JESUS, CARLOS JR & DEANNA
1050 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

KOONER, IQBAL S & DALJIT K
1029 WINDMILL COVE CT
STOCKTON, CA 95209

BUENVIAJE FELEMARIE A TR
10162 WINDMILL COVE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

MADHURE, VASANTH S & VEENA S TR
1004 WINDJAMMER DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

ALBINTO, JAIME & DARLEEN
985 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95206

SANDHU SUMEL SINGH TR
1016 WINDJAMMER DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

ROGERS MARY M TR
1028 WINDJAMMER DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

NGUYEN, MARY JANE ETAL
10148 WINDMILL COVE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

SADORRA JAMES B & MARIA NYMPHA C
10134 WINDMILL COVE DR
STOCKTON, CA 95209

DEMESA WILLIAM B
961 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

SISON, AIMEE L
996 GEDDINGS WAY
STOCKTON, CA 95209

UNION PACIFIC, CORPORATION
1400 DOUGLAS ST STOP 1640
OMAHA, NE 68179

WINDMILL PARK OWNERS ASSN
1731 E ROSEVILLE PKWY #100
ROSEVILLE, CA 95661

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

ALPINE PACKING CO
2000 MONTY CT
STOCKTON, CA 95207

LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
1305 E VINE ST
LODI, CA 95240

UNION PACIFIC, CORPORATION
1400 DOUGLAS ST STOP 1640
OMAHA, NE 68179

ASHLEY LANE LP
PO BOX 659
LINDEN, CA 95236

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219

VAL SAN ASSOCIATES
3031 W MARCH LN STE 112 SOUTH
STOCKTON, CA 95219
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1278
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
INITIAL STUDY/
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR THE
WHISTLER WAY ANNEXATION
Stockton, CA
November 17, 2021
Prepared for:

City of Stockton
Community Development Department
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Prepared by:

BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.
802 W. Lodi Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1279

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
INITIAL STUDY/
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
FOR THE
WHISTLER WAY ANNEXATION
Stockton, CA
November 17, 2021
Prepared for:

City of Stockton
Community Development Department
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Prepared by:

BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.
802 W. Lodi Avenue
Lodi, CA 95240
209-224-8213
www.basecampenv.com
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1280
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
NEGATIVE DECLARATION v
A. General Project Information v
B. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected vi
C. Lead Agency Determination vii
Chapter 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Project Brief 1-1

1.2 Purpose of Initial Study 1-1

1.3 Project Background 1-3

1.4 Environmental Evaluation Checklist Terminology 1-3

1.5 Summary of Environmental Effects and Mitigation Measures 1-4 Chapter 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1

2.1 Project Location 2-1

2.2 Project Details 2-1

2.3 Permits and Approvals 2-5
Chapter 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION FORM 3-1

3.1 Aesthetics 3-1

3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources 3-3

3.3 Air Quality 3-5

3.4 Biological Resources 3-10

3.5 Cultural Resources 3-13

3.6 Energy 3-15

3.7 Geology and Soils 3-17

3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3-21

3.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials 3-24
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1281
ii

3.10 Hydrology and Water Quality 3-28

3.11 Land Use and Planning 3-32

3.12 Mineral Resources 3-35

3.13 Noise 3-36

3.14 Population and Housing 3-39

3.15 Public Services 3-40

3.16 Recreation 3-43

3.17 Transportation 3-44

3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources 3-47

3.19 Utilities and Service Systems 3-49

3.20 Wildfire 3-51

3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance 3-53
Chapter 4.0 REFERENCES 4-1

4.1 Document Preparers 4-1

4.2 References Cited 4-1

4.3 Persons Consulted 4-4
Chapter 5.0 NOTES RELATED TO EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 5-1

APPENDICES
A. CalEEMod Results
B. Incidental Take Minimization Measures
C. AB 52 Notification Material
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1282
iii

LIST OF TABLES
1-1 Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 1-10 2-1 Annexation Area Parcels and Acreages 2-1
2-2 Proposed Building Development 2-3
2-3 Required Permits and Approvals for Project 2-5
3-1 San Joaquin Valley Air Basin Attainment Status 3-6
3-2 SJVAPCD Significance Thresholds and Project Construction Emissions 3-8 3-3 Project GHG Emissions 3-22
3-4 City of Stockton Land Use-Related Noise Standards 3-37 3-5 Groundborne Vibration Thresholds 3-37
3-6 Construction Equipment Noise 3-39

LIST OF FIGURES
1-1 Regional Location Map 1-5
1-2 Street Map 1-6
1-3 USGS Map 1-7
1-4 Aerial Photo 1-8
1-5 Assessor Parcel Map 1-9
2-1 Proposed Annexation and Prezoning 2-7
2-2 Site Plan 2-8
2-3 Elevation 2-9
2-4 Elevation 2-10
2-5 Aerial Simulation 2-11
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1283
iv

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT AB Assembly Bill
APN Assessor’s Parcel Number
ARB California Air Resources Board
BMP Best Management Practice
CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model
Cal Fire California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CAP Climate Action Plan
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CO carbon monoxide
CO2e carbon dioxide equivalent
dB decibel
EIR Environmental Impact Report
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
GHG greenhouse gas
IS/MND Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration
Ldn Day-Night Average Level
LOS Level of Service
MS4 municipal separate storm sewer system
NAHC Native American Heritage Commission
NOx nitrogen oxides
PM10 particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter
PM2.5 particulate matter 2.5 microns or less in diameter ROG reactive organic gases
SB Senate Bill
SJCOG San Joaquin Council of Governments
SJMSCP San Joaquin County Multi-Species Open Space and Habitat Conservation Plan
SJRTD San Joaquin Regional Transit District
SJVAPCD San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District SWMP Storm Water Management Plan
SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board
TAC toxic air contaminant
UAIC United Auburn Indian Community
VMT vehicle miles traveled
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1284
v
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
A. General Project Information
Project Title: Whistler Way Annexation
Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Stockton
Community Development Department
345 N. El Dorado Street
Stockton, CA 95202
Contact Person and Phone Number: Matt Diaz, Planning Manager 209-937-8598
Project Location: Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road, Stockton
Project Sponsor Name and Address: Strategic Land Planning 18040 Foreman Court
Linden, CA 95236
Attn: David Stagnaro
General Plan Designation: Agricultural-Urban Reserve (County), Commercial (City of Stockton)
Zoning: C-C - Community Commercial (County)
Project Description: The project proposes the annexation of six parcels totaling 8.76 acres to the City of Stockton,
including adjacent road right-of-way. The
annexation area would be pre-zoned CG
(Commercial General). Upon annexation, the
project proposes to develop 7.26 acres for a selfstorage facility totaling 100,850 square feet in floor area. The facility would consist of ten
buildings with a total of 570 storage units of
various sizes, plus a combined office/onsite
manager residence building. An enlarged entrance
to the facility would be constructed off Grider
Way. Perimeter walls and landscaping would be
installed.

Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site is within a mostly developed area of north Stockton. Residential subdivisions are ato
the north and west. Also west of the site is
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1285
vi
Podesta Ranch Elementary School. A small
commercial center fronting on Lower Sacramento
Road is to the east, and beyond Lower
Sacramento Road is agricultural land.

Commercial and vacant properties are to the
south, with two commercial buildings adjacent to
the project site.

Other Public Agencies Whose
Approval is Required: San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (annexation), State Water Resources
Control Board (Construction General Permit)
Have California Native American
tribes traditionally and culturally
affiliated with the project area
requested consultation pursuant to
Public Resources Code Section
21080.3.1? If so, has consultation
begun?
Notifications have been sent on behalf of the City
to the list of potentially interested tribes shown in
Appendix C together with information generated
during a prior tribal consultation by San Joaquin
County in conjunction with a prior version of the
project. No requests for consultation have been
received as of the date of publication of this
document.

B. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below may be significantly affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” prior to mitigation.

Mitigation measures that would avoid potential effects or reduce them to a level that would be less than significant have been prescribed for each of these effects, as described in the checklist and narrative on the following pages, and in the Summary Table at the end of Chapter 1.0.

Aesthetics Agriculture/Forestry
Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy
Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards/Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use Mineral Resources
Noise Population/Housing Public Services
Recreation Transportation Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities/Service Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1286
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1287
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-1 November 2021

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Project Brief
This document is an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Whistler Way Annexation (project). The project site is located at the intersection of Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road in unincorporated San Joaquin County, adjacent to the City of Stockton (Figures 1-1 through 1-5). Strategic Land Planning is the applicant for the purposes of City of Stockton (City) action on the project. On City approval, the City will be the project proponent for the purposes of Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo) action on the proposed annexation. The IS/MND has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). For the purposes of this CEQA analysis, the City is the Lead Agency for the project.

The project proposes the annexation of six parcels totaling 8.76 acres to the City of Stockton, including two developed parcels, along with adjacent road right-of-way. The annexation area would be pre-zoned to the City of Stockton CG (Commercial General) zoning district. Upon annexation, the project proposes to develop 7.26 acres that are currently vacant for a self-storage facility totaling 100,850 square feet in floor area. The facility would consist of ten buildings with a total of 570 storage units of various sizes, plus a combined office/onsite manager residence building. An enlarged entrance to the facility would be constructed off Grider Way. Perimeter walls and landscaping would be installed. Annexation of the project site would require approval by the San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo). Pre-zoning would require approval by the City, as well as an Administrative Use Permit and site plan and design review approval for the proposed development.

On occasion, the term “annexation area” will be used in this document, which means the area proposed to be annexed by the City. The annexation area includes both the proposed “development area” and portions of the adjacent rights-of-way of Whistler/Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road; these right-of-way areas are not proposed for development.

For the sake of convenience, when environmental impacts are analyzed, the term “project site” will be used, which will be understood to cover the entire annexation area.

1.2 Purpose of Initial Study
CEQA requires that public agencies document and consider the potential environmental effects of the agency’s actions that meet CEQA’s definition of a project. Briefly summarized, a “project” is an action that may cause direct or indirect physical changes in the environment. A project includes the agency’s direct activities and activities that involve public agency approvals or funding. The State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3) provides guidance for an agency’s implementation of CEQA.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1288
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-2 November 2021
Provided that a project is not exempt from CEQA, the first step in the agency’s consideration of its potential environmental effects is the preparation of an Initial Study.

The purpose of an Initial Study is to determine whether the project would involve “significant” environmental effects, as defined by CEQA, and to describe feasible mitigation measures that would avoid identified significant effects or reduce them to a level that is less than significant. If the Initial Study does not identify significant effects, then the agency ordinarily prepares a Negative Declaration. If the Initial Study concludes that significant effects would occur but also identifies mitigation measures that would reduce these significant effects to a level that is less than significant, then the agency may prepare a Mitigated Negative Declaration. If a project would involve significant effects that cannot be feasibly mitigated, then the agency must prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The agency may also decide to proceed directly with the preparation of an EIR without first preparing an Initial Study.

The proposed project is a “project” as defined by CEQA and is not exempt from CEQA consideration. The City has determined that the project may have potentially significant environmental effects and therefore requires preparation of an Initial Study. This Initial Study describes the proposed project and its environmental setting, discusses the potential environmental effects of the project, and identifies feasible mitigation measures that would eliminate any potentially significant environmental effects of the project or reduce them to a level that would be less than significant. The Initial Study considers the project’s potential for significant environmental effects in the following subject areas:
• Aesthetics
• Agricultural Resources
• Air Quality
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Energy
• Geology and Soils
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions
• Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
• Hydrology and Water Quality
• Land Use and Planning
• Mineral Resources
• Noise
• Population and Housing
• Public Services
• Recreation
• Transportation/Traffic
• Tribal Cultural Resources
• Utilities and Service Systems
• Wildfire
• Mandatory Findings of
Significance (including
Cumulative Impacts)
This Initial Study concludes that the project would have potentially significant environmental impacts, but all these impacts would be avoided or reduced to a level that would be less than significant with identified mitigation measures. The project proponent has accepted the obligation to implement all the mitigation measures; implementation by the developer will be required as a project condition of approval. As a result, the City has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration and has issued a Notice of Intent to adopt the IS/MND for the project. The Notice of Intent, inside the cover of this document, shows the time available for public comment on the IS/MND.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1289
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-3 November 2021

1.3 Project Background
As noted, two of the parcels proposed for annexation have been developed, each with a commercial building. A site plan for development of four of the parcels within the current project site was submitted to San Joaquin County (County) in 2020. The site plan proposed the development of a storage facility similar to the application for City approval described in this document; under the County application only eight storage buildings would be built. The County approved the site plan with conditions on April 21, 2021. At the time of County approval, the project site was expected to remain in the County but would connect to the water, wastewater, and storm drainage systems of the City of Stockton. Connection to City utilities would, however, have required an Out-of-Area Agreement with the City. The LAFCo has expressed its concerns about the use of Out-ofArea Agreements for projects in the unincorporated area, indicating a preference that such projects be annexed to the City. As a result, the project applicant has applied to the City requesting annexation of the project site, along with a pre-zoning request and request for necessary City approvals of the proposed site development; these requests are the subject of this IS/MND.

1.4 Environmental Evaluation Checklist Terminology
The project’s potential environmental effects are evaluated in the Environmental Evaluation Checklist presented in Chapter 3.0 of this IS/MND. The checklist includes a list of environmental considerations against which the project is evaluated. For each question, the City determines whether the project would involve 1) a Potentially Significant Impact, 2) a Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated, 3) a Less Than Significant Impact, or 4) No Impact.
• A Potentially Significant Impact occurs when there is substantial evidence that the project would involve a substantial adverse change to the physical environment, i.e., the environmental effect may be significant, and feasible mitigation measures have not been defined that would reduce the impact to a level that would be less than significant. If there is a Potentially Significant Impact entry in the Initial Study, then an EIR is required. No Potentially Significant Impacts have been identified in this IS/MND. • An environmental effect that is Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated is a Potentially Significant Impact that can be avoided or reduced to a level that is less than significant with the application of defined mitigation measures. This IS/MND identifies a few impacts that are Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated.
• A Less Than Significant Impact occurs when the project would involve an environmental impact, but the impact would not cause a substantial adverse change to the physical environment such that mitigation would be required. • A determination of No Impact is self-explanatory.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1290
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-4 November 2021
This IS/MND identifies certain potentially significant environmental effects that would be mitigated by implementation of existing provisions of law and standards of practice related to land use planning and environmental protection. Where appropriate, such provisions are identified and considered in the environmental impact analysis, and the degree to which they would reduce potential environmental effects is discussed. These protections are considered part of the existing regulatory environment and are assumed to avoid or minimize the potential environmental effects of the project. Additional mitigation measures are identified in this IS/MND, as necessary, when existing provisions of law and standards of practice are not adequate to avoid potentially significant environmental effects or to reduce them to a level that is less than significant.

1.5 Summary of Environmental Effects and Mitigation Measures Table 1-1, which follows Figures 1-1 through 1-5, summarizes the results of the Environmental Evaluation Checklist and associated narrative discussion in Chapter 3.0 of this IS/MND. The potential environmental impacts of the proposed project are listed in the left-most column of this table. The level of significance of each impact is indicated in the second column. Feasible mitigation measures that avoid or minimize the impacts, if necessary, are shown in the third column, and the significance of the impact after the mitigation measures are applied is shown in the fourth column.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1291
BaseCamp
Figure 1-1
BaseCamp Environmental REGIONAL LOCATION MAP
San Diego Imperial
Orange
Riverside
San Bernardino
Ventura Los Angeles
Santa Barbara
Kern San Luis
Obispo
Inyo
Tulare
Kings Monterey
Fresno
San
Benito
Mono
Madera
Mariposa
Tuolumne
Calaveras
Amador
El Dorado
Sacramento
Alpine
Santa
Clara
San
Joaquin
Contra
Costa
Merced
Marin
Napa
Yolo
Solano
Sutter
Lake Colusa Placer Yuba
Sonoma
Stanislaus Alameda
Santa Cruz
San Mateo
San Francisco
www.csac.counties.org

PROJECT SITE
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1292
BaseCamp
Figure 1-2
BaseCamp Environmental STREET MAP

PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: Google Maps
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1293
BaseCamp
Figure 1-3
BaseCamp Environmental USGS MAP
SOURCE: USGS Quadangle Map, Lodi South 1968. T 2N, R 6E, S4

PROJECT SITE
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1294
BaseCamp
Figure 1-4
BaseCamp Environmental Aerial Photo

PROJECT SITE
SOURCE: Google Earth
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1295
Figure 1-5
BaseCamp Environmental ASSESSOR PARCEL MAP

PROJECT SITE
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1296
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-10 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures

3.1 AESTHETICS
a) Scenic Vistas NI None required -
b) Scenic Resources and Highways NI None required -
c) Visual Character and Quality LS None required -
d) Light and Glare LS None required -

3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
a) Agricultural Land Conversion NI None required -
b) Conflict with Agricultural Zoning or Williamson
Act Contract
LS None required -
c, d) Forest Lands NI None required -
e) Indirect Conversion of Farmland or Forest Land NI None required -

3.3 AIR QUALITY
a) Air Quality Plan Consistency LS None required -
b) Cumulative Emissions LS None required -
d) Exposure of Sensitive Receptors LS None required -
e) Odors and Other Emissions LS None required -

3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a) Special-Status Species LS None required -
b) Riparian and Sensitive Habitats, NI None required - Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1297
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-11 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures
c) State and Federally Protected Wetlands NI None required - d) Fish and Wildlife Movement LS None required -
e) Local Biological Resource Requirements NI None required - f) Conflict with Habitat Conservation Plans NI None required -

3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
a) Historical Resources LS None required -
b) Archaeological Resources PS CULT-1: If any subsurface archaeological resources are encountered during construction, all construction
activities within a 50-foot radius of the encounter shall be immediately halted until a qualified archaeologist can examine these materials, initially evaluate their
significance and, if potentially significant, recommend measures on the disposition of the resource. The City shall be immediately notified in the event of a discovery. The contractor shall be responsible for retaining qualified professionals, implementing recommended mitigation
measures, and documenting mitigation efforts in written reports to the City. Recommended measures could include, but are not limited to, 1) preservation in place, or 2) excavation, recovery, and curation by qualified
professionals.

LS
c) Human Burials LS None required -

3.6 ENERGY
a) Project Energy Consumption LS None required -
b) Consistency with Energy Plans LS None required -
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1298
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-12 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures

3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
a-i) Fault Rupture Hazards NI None required -
a-ii) Seismic Ground Shaking LS None required -
a-iii) Seismic-Related Ground Failure LS None required - a-iv) Landslides NI None required -
b) Soil Erosion LS None required -
c) Geologic Instability NI None required -
d) Expansive Soils LS None required -
e) Adequacy of Soils for Sewage Disposal NI None required - f) Paleontological Resources PS GEO-1: If buried paleontological resources are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing
activities, work shall stop within 50 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can examine these materials, initially evaluate their significance and, if potentially significant, recommend measures on the disposition of the resource. The City shall be immediately notified in the event of a discovery. Prior to construction, construction personnel shall receive brief “tailgate” training by a qualified archaeologist in the identification of
paleontological resources and protocol for notification should such resources be discovered during construction work.

LS

3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
a, b) Project GHG Emissions and Consistency with
GHG Reduction Plans
LS None required -
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1299
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-13 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures

3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
a) Hazardous Material Transportation, Use, and
Storage
LS None required -
b) Upset and Accident Conditions LS None required -
c) Release of Hazardous Materials near Schools LS None required - d) Hazardous Material Sites PS HAZ-1: Prior to final site plan approval, the project applicant shall retain a qualified environmental
professional to conduct soil testing to determine the potential presence of soil contamination on the project site.

If testing reveals hazardous levels of agricultural chemical residues, the environmental professional make
recommendations for remediation needed to reduce
contamination to acceptable levels for the proposed land use. Recommendations shall be implemented by the
applicant.

LS
e) Public Airports NI None required -
f) Emergency Response and Evacuations PS HAZ-2: Prior to the start of project construction, the applicant’s contractor shall prepare and implement a Traffic Control Plan, which shall include such items as traffic control requirements, resident notification of access closure, and daily access restoration. The contractor shall specify dates and times of road closures or restrictions, if any, and shall ensure that adequate access will be provided for emergency vehicles. The Traffic Control Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Department of Public Works and shall be coordinated with the Stockton Fire and Police Departments if construction will require road closures or lane restrictions.

LS
g) Wildland Fire Hazards NI None required -
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1300
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-14 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures

3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
a) Water Quality LS None required -
b) Groundwater Supplies and Recharge LS None required - c-i, ii) Drainage Patterns LS None required -
c-iii) Runoff LS None required -
c-iv) Flooding Hazards NI None required -
d) Release of Pollutants in Flood, Tsunami, or Seiche
Zones
NI None required -
e) Conflicts with Water Quality or Groundwater
Management Plans
LS None required -

3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING
a) Division of Established Community NI None required - b) Conflicts with Land Use Plans, Policies and
Regulations
LS None required -

3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES
a, b) Availability of Mineral Resources NI None required -

3.13 NOISE
a) Generation of Noise Exceeding Local Standards PS NOISE-1: The following measures shall be implemented to minimize noise impacts at sensitive receptors (i.e., residences and schools) during construction:
• Construction activities shall be limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on all working days.

LS
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1301
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-15 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures
Construction work shall not occur on Sundays and federal holidays.
• Use newer equipment with improved muffling and
ensure that all equipment items have the
manufacturers’ recommended noise abatement
measures, such as mufflers, engine enclosures, and engine vibration isolators intact and operational. All construction equipment shall be inspected at periodic
intervals to ensure proper maintenance and presence
of noise control devices (e.g., mufflers and shrouding, etc.).
• Turn off idling equipment when not in use for more than five (5) minutes.
b) Exposure to Groundborne Vibrations LS None required - c) Public Airport and Private Airstrip Noise NI None required -

3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING
a) Unplanned Population Growth NI None required -
b) Displacement of Housing or People NI None required -

3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a-i) Fire Protection LS None required -
a-ii) Police Protection LS None required -
a-iii) Schools NI None required -
a-iv) Parks NI None required -
a-v) Other Public Facilities NI None required -
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1302
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-16 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures

3.16 RECREATION
a, b) Recreational Facilities NI None required -

3.17 TRANSPORTATION
a) Conflicts with Transportation Programs/Plans LS None required - b) Conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section
15064.3(b)
NI None required -
c) Traffic Hazards NI None required -
d) Emergency Access NI None required -

3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
a, b) Tribal Cultural Resources PS TCR-1: A minimum of seven days prior to the start of any ground-disturbing activity, the contractor shall notify the City’s Community Development Department of the start date and invite a UAIC tribal representative or tribal monitor to inspect the project site within the first five days of ground disturbance activity. During this inspection, the UAIC tribal representative or tribal monitor shall provide an onsite meeting for construction personnel information on tribal cultural resources and a workers’ awareness brochure. The meeting shall include relevant information on sensitive tribal cultural resources, applicable regulations and protocols for avoidance, and consequences of violating State laws and regulations. It shall describe appropriate avoidance and minimization measures for resources and shall outline what to do and whom to contact if any potential tribal cultural resources are encountered.

The meeting shall underscore the requirement for
confidentiality and culturally appropriate treatment of any find with cultural significance to Native American tribal values.

LS
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1303
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-17 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures
TCR-2: If any potential tribal cultural resources are encountered during project construction activities, all work within 100 feet of the encounter shall be suspended, and the UAIC, the City, and the onsite project manager shall be immediately notified. If human remains are
encountered, the County Coroner shall also be notified in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c). The tribal monitor and/or a qualified
archaeologist shall examine the find and determine the disposition of the resource. Preservation in place is the preferred alternative, although other options may be pursued in coordination with the tribal monitor. The location and nature of the encountered resource shall be strictly confidential, and under no circumstances shall the contractor or any employee collect the encountered material.

3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
a) Relocation or Construction of Utility Facilities LS None required - b) Water Supplies NI None required -
c) Wastewater Treatment Capacity NI None required -
d, e) Solid Waste Services NI None required -

3.20 WILDFIRE
a) Emergency Response Plans and Emergency
Evacuation Plans
PS Mitigation Measure HAZ-1. LS
b) Exposure of Project Occupants to Wildfire
Hazards
NI None required -
c) Installation and Maintenance of Infrastructure NI None required - Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1304
TABLE 1-1

SUMMARY OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 1-18 November 2021
Potential Impact
Significance
Before Mitigation
Measures Mitigation Measures
Significance
After Mitigation
Measures
d) Risks from Runoff, Post-Fire Slope Instability, or
Drainage Changes
NI None required -

3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Findings on Biological and Cultural Resources PS Mitigation measures in Sections 3.5 and 3.18 above. LS b) Findings on Cumulatively Considerable Impacts LS None required - c) Findings on Adverse Effects on Human Beings LS None required - Notes: NI = No Impact; LS = Less Than Significant; PS = Potentially Significant Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1305
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 2-1 November 2021

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Project Location
The project site is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road in unincorporated San Joaquin County, adjacent to northern Stockton (see Figures 1-1 through 1-5). The project site is shown on the U.S. Geological Survey’s Lodi South 7.5-minute quadrangle map within Section 4, Township 2 North, Range 6 East, Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian. The latitude of the project site is approximately 38° 02ʹ 45ʺ North, and the longitude is approximately 121° 19ʹ 16ʺ West.

2.2 Project Details
Reorganization and Pre-zoning
The project proposes a reorganization that would involve the annexation of six parcels, currently under County jurisdiction, into the City of Stockton (Figure 2-1) Table 2-1 shows the parcels proposed for annexation, each identified by its Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN), its address, and its acreage. APNs 070-140-11 and 070-140-34 have been developed; the other parcels are vacant.

TABLE 2-1

ANNEXATION AREA PARCELS AND ACREAGES
APN Address Acres
070-140-10 9993 Lower Sacramento Road 4.00
070-140-11 611 W. Grider Way 0.63
070-140-34 681 W. Grider Way 0.87
070-140-35 692 W. Grider Way (partial) 2.00
070-560-47 10091 Lower Sacramento Road 1.01
070-570-13 No address assigned 0.25
TOTAL ACRES 8.76
The project also proposes to annex the rights-of-way of the segments of Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road that are along the annexation area frontage. Existing Grider Way is already connected to existing Whistler Way; these street names would need to be Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1306
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 2-2 November 2021
consolidated in the future. It is expected that LAFCo would require the annexation area to be detached from the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District, which currently has jurisdiction over the annexation area. Fire protection services after annexation would be provided by the Stockton Fire Department (see Section 3.15, Public Services).

After approving the pre-zoning, the City would submit an annexation application to the San Joaquin LAFCo, which would then be responsible for approval of the annexation and detachment. LAFCo’s policies with respect to proposed reorganizations are specified in its Change of Organization Policies and Procedures, adopted in 2007 and subsequently amended. Key considerations of LAFCo in considering approval of an annexation include if the annexation would constitute a logical expansion of a city boundary and if the annexation area would be provided with public utilities and services in an efficient manner. Additional information on LAFCo requirements and findings are provided in Section 3.11, Land Use. The project site is within the City of Stockton’s Sphere of Influence and its 10-Year Planning Horizon Area as defined in the City’s adopted Municipal Service Review.

The parcels in the proposed annexation area are currently zoned by the County as C-C - Community Commercial. The project proposes that the City Council pre-zone the entire project site CG (Commercial General). The proposed pre-zoning would be consistent with both the proposed development and the current Commercial designation of the parcels under the Stockton General Plan 2040. Pre-zoning would require a recommendation for approval from the Stockton Planning Commission and final approval by the City Council. The pre-zoning would take effect upon recordation of the proposed annexation.

Project Development
The project proposes development of a self-storage facility on the following four parcels:

APNs 070-140-10, 070-140-35, 070-560-47, and 070-570-13. All four of these parcels are currently vacant. The total acreage of these parcels is 7.26 acres. APN 070-140-11 has existing development and would not be affected by the proposed development described here. APN 070-140-34 also has existing development and would not be affected by the proposed development, except for one feature described later.

Figure 2-2 shows the proposed site plan. The proposed development consists of ten buildings that would accommodate storage units, plus one building that would house an office and an onsite manager residence. Figures 2-3A and 2-3B show the building elevations. Table 2-2 summarizes the proposed building development. A more detailed description of the development follows.

Storage Unit Buildings
The project proposes to construct ten buildings that would accommodate storage units.

As indicated in Table 2-2, the storage units would range in size from 5 feet x 5 feet (25 square feet) to 10 feet x 30 feet (300 square feet), and the buildings would accommodate between 21 and 115 units. The buildings would be one story, with a maximum height of 11 feet, 6 inches. The buildings would be constructed of metal, with stucco coating and Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1307
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 2-3 November 2021
foam trim. Access to all storage units would be from the outside, except for some units in Building G that would be accessible from the inside through a corridor. Access to this corridor would be controlled by a gate. The anticipated days and hours of operation would be Monday through Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

TABLE 2-2

PROPOSED BUILDING DEVELOPMENT
Building
Floor Area
(sq. ft.)
Unit Sizes (ft. x ft.)
Total
Units
5 x 5 5 x 10 10 x
10 10 x
15 10 x
20 10 x
25 10 x
30 A 5,600 1 1 2 1 17 22
B 6,825 4 1 4 24 33
C 18,925 1 6 55 53 115
D 13,850 3 4 89 96
E 10,800 1 2 35 2 34 74
F 7,800 3 26 2 24 55
G 7,425 6 2 20 12 17 57
H 14,900 5 1 2 48 56
I 5,500 1 1 20 8 11 41
J 6,100 1 3 1 16 21
G Corridor 725
Office/
Residence
2,400
TOTAL 100,850 26 16 108 174 141 24 81 570
Office/Residential Unit
The project proposes construction of a two-story office building to be located adjacent to the facility entrance. The total floor area of the building would be 2,400 square feet. The lower story would accommodate the facility office, while the upper story would have a residential unit for an onsite manager. The office building would be a concrete tilt-up structure with a maximum height of 27 feet, 8 inches, and it would include foam trim.

The exterior of the building would accommodate signage at the top.

Other Features
The facility would be accessed from a driveway off Grider Way. The driveway would be constructed in accordance with City standards. A rolling gate, approximately 30 feet in length, would control access to and from the facility. An exit keypad would be mounted Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1308
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 2-4 November 2021
on a concrete pole near the gate. Another gated access point would be from 681 Grider Way (APN 070-140-34). This access would be for emergency vehicles only.

Five parking spaces would be provided for visitors and delivery vehicles in front of the office building, outside the gate. Two bicycle racks would be provided near the office building, outside the gate. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements would be installed along the Grider Way frontage of the project site, in accordance with City standards.

Along the northern boundary, a concrete masonry wall approximately 8 feet in height would be installed to provide a visual screen between the storage facility and the residential area to the north. A solid wall would also be installed along the other boundaries of the project site. Landscaping would be installed along the Grider Way and Lower Sacramento Road frontages to the facility.

The facility would connect to existing water and wastewater lines beneath Grider Way that are part of the respective utility systems of the City of Stockton. Connections to these systems would be per applicable City standards. Electrical and natural gas services would be provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E).

Street Frontage Improvements
Project development will also require the improvement of the project site frontage on Grider Way; these improvements will include additional pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk in accordance with City street improvement standards. The exact location and type of improvements will be established in detailed improvements to be submitted to the City of Stockton for approval. However, as discussed with staff, these improvements are expected to provide a two-lane street divided by a two-way left turn lane, similar to the Whistler Way street section west of Windmill Park Drive. This design would need to be reviewed by City staff prior to construction
The planned improvements will require the dedication of right-of-way by the applicant along the project site frontage on Grider Way and acquisition of right-of-way along the frontage of existing commercial properties; this will also be the responsibility of the project applicant. The City and applicant’s engineer will work closely to ensure that necessary improvements will be designed to minimize the need for new right-of-way and impacts on adjoining properties.

Project Construction
Project construction would generally be accomplished using conventional equipment.

Proposed development would involve grading, excavation and compaction as required to establish desired subgrades and accommodate the proposed new buildings, access ways and site improvements. Building foundations, fence post footings, and underground utility line conduits would be excavated where needed. Aggregate base and pavement would be imported, placed on the site and compacted. Construction of buildings, site improvements, and landscaping would proceed as sequenced by the contractor, in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the City.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1309
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 2-5 November 2021

2.3 Permits and Approvals
The project would require discretionary approvals from the City of Stockton, including pre-zoning, site plan review, design review, and an Administrative Use Permit for the proposed self-storage facility. While the self-storage is an allowed use in the proposed CG zone, an Administrative Use Permit for this use is required by Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.20.020. The City would be responsible for preparing and submitting the annexation application to LAFCo with a recommendation from the Development Review Committee, convened by the Community Development Department and chaired by the City Manager’s office.

The annexation and detachment of the project site would require approval by the San Joaquin LAFCo. As part of the annexation application, LAFCo typically requires preparation of a City Services Plan that describes how various urban utilities and services will be provided to the proposed development. The City Services Plan also demonstrates the financial feasibility of providing city services to a proposed annexation area. LAFCo typically requires written statements regarding agricultural land conversion and adequacy of water supplies. The City Services Plan and required statements would be provided to LAFCo in a separate document.

Table 2-3 provides a summary of permits and approvals that would be required for the project from the City, LAFCo, and other agencies.

TABLE 2-3

REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS FOR PROJECT
Agency Permit/Approval
City of Stockton, City Council Adoption of Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, CEQA findings and mitigation
monitoring program
Approval of application for annexation, including
pre-zoning of project site
City of Stockton, Planning
Commission*
Recommendations to the City Council on pre-zoning
and other land use and development actions
Administrative Use Permit approval for future
development
City of Stockton, Community
Development Department
Site Plan and Design Review approvals
City of Stockton, Public Works
Department
Approval of site improvement plans
Approval of storm drainage facilities
Encroachment permits for work in streets
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1310
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 2-6 November 2021
Agency Permit/Approval
City of Stockton, Municipal Utilities
Department
Compliance with City of Stockton construction and
post-construction storm water quality requirements
Connections to City’s water, sewer, and storm
drainage systems
City of Stockton, Development Review
Committee
Recommendation on annexation application
San Joaquin Local Agency Formation
Commission
Approval of annexation application
Approval of City Services Plan
Approval of Agricultural Land Conversion
Statement
State Water Resources Control Board Compliance with Construction General Permit requirements through City MS4 permit
requirements.
* Planning Commission decisions can be appealed to the City Council.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1311
Figure 2-1
BaseCamp Environmental PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA & PREZONING SOURCE: Project Applications

WHISTLER WAY
070-140-11
070-140-34
070-570-35
070-570-35
070-570-13

LOWER SACRAMENTO ROAD
070-140-10
070-560-47

PROPOSED ANNEXATION AREA

PROPOSED PREZONING AREA
(CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL)
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1312
Figure 2-2
BaseCamp Environmental SITE PLAN
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1313
Figure 2-3
BaseCamp Environmental ELEVATION SOURCE: DOMUM
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1314
Figure 2-4
BaseCamp Environmental ELEVATION
SOURCE: DOMUM
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1315
Figure 2-5
BaseCamp Environmental AERIAL SIMULATION
SOURCE: DOMUM
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1316
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-1 November 2021

3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM

3.1 AESTHETICS
Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage points.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site is vacant land consisting of bare surface soils interspersed with scrub brush.

The southern portion of the project site has two existing commercial buildings. The project site is bounded to the east by Lower Sacramento Road, a two-lane road. Lighting at the project site is limited to street lighting along Lower Sacramento Road and security lighting at existing on-site buildings and adjacent land uses. The surrounding area contains a mix of residential and commercial development and vacant land, along with Podesta Ranch Elementary School to the west. An existing residential area is along the northern boundary of the site. The site is planned for urban commercial development in the Stockton General Plan.

The Stockton Design Guidelines, adopted in 2004, serve as a reference point for the City’s expectations for quality development and provide guidance for the designated review authority during the design review process. Chapter 4 of the Design Guidelines sets forth standards for commercial development, while Section 4.02 provides guidelines specifically for storage facilities, among other commercial uses. The general design objectives for storage Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1317
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-2 November 2021
facilities are quality development, compatibility with surrounding uses, architectural character, and landscape emphasis (City of Stockton 2004).

California Public Resources Code Section 21099 states that the aesthetic and parking impacts of residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center projects on an infill site within a transit priority area shall not be considered significant. The project is not a residential, mixeduse residential, or employment center project. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria of Section 21099, and aesthetic impacts must be analyzed.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Scenic Vistas.

Scenic vistas have been defined as vantage points with a broad and expansive view of a significant landscape feature, such as a mountain range or coastline. The Stockton General Plan 2040 EIR notes that the adopted General Plan does not designate scenic vistas.

However, distant views of the Sierra Nevada mountain range are available in parts of the Stockton area that are not limited by the built environment. The existing built environment in the project vicinity severely limits distant views; the project would not detract from or improve existing distant views. The project would have no impact on scenic vistas. b) Scenic Resources and Highways.

The Stockton General Plan identifies open space, agricultural fields, and riparian areas, particularly along the San Joaquin River and the Calaveras River, as significant visual features (City of Stockton 2018a). No such visual features are in the area other than agricultural fields to the east of Lower Sacramento Road. However, these fields are not visible from the project site.

The project site itself contains no scenic resources of notable value. The project site consists of bare soil interspersed with scrub brush. No mature trees or other substantial vegetation of scenic value were observed on the project site.

According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) list of designated scenic highways under the California Scenic Highway Program, there are only two officially designated state scenic highways within San Joaquin County: Interstate 5 from the Stanislaus County Line to Interstate 580, and Interstate 580 from Interstate 5 to the Alameda County Line (Caltrans 2017). The project site is not on either of these State Scenic Highways. The Stockton General Plan has not designated any local scenic roadways. The project would have no impact on scenic resources.
c) Visual Character and Quality.

The project site is in an area that is becoming predominantly urban. The project would be consistent with the existing developed landscape. As noted, the project site contains no scenic resources of notable value. The project may improve the visual character of the project site; the project will be required to be consistent with the applicable provisions of the City’s Design Guidelines, especially the provisions addressing storage facilities. In addition, Stockton Municipal Code Chapter 16.56 sets forth landscaping standards for all projects that Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1318
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-3 November 2021
require approval by the City. In accordance with Section 16.56.030, the project would submit a landscape plan that would be reviewed and approved for consistency with the City’s landscape standards. As a result, adverse project impacts on visual character and quality would be less than significant.
d) Light and Glare.

The project would include exterior lighting of buildings, accessways and loading areas to permit after-dark use. Proposed lighting would be required to comply with outdoor lighting standards set forth in Stockton Municipal Code Sections 16.32.070 and 16.36.060(B).

Section 16.32.070 states that exterior lights shall be located so as to eliminate spillover illumination or glare onto adjoining properties and to prohibit any interference with the normal operation or enjoyment of adjacent property. They also shall be made up of a light source, reflector, and shielding devices so that, acting together, the light beam is controlled and not directed across a property line or upward into the sky; bare bulbs are not allowed.

Section 16.36.060(B) requires exterior lighting to be energy-efficient, stationary, shielded, and directed away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way.

The project applicant has prepared a photometric plan that indicates the levels of illumination on the project site and along its boundaries, based on the anticipated lighting to be used by the project. Illumination levels are measured in foot-candles. Projected illumination levels, as shown on the photometric plan, were uniformly less than 1.0 foot-candle at or near the north project boundary, which would not result in a significant light or glare effect on the adjoining residences, even if the site were not shielded by masonry wall. At one location, projected illumination would reach 1.6 and 3.6 foot-candles at the northern edge of the project site. However, the adjoining residential uses at this point and along the remainder of the wall, would be shielded from potential light and glare effects by the required 8-foot masonry wall, as illustrated in Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.32.070. This, along with compliance with these provisions of the Municipal Code would minimize the amount of indirect illumination that may occur, thereby reducing lighting impacts on nearby residences to a level that would be less than significant.

Glare is produced mainly by materials that reflect sunlight. Project structures would be painted with darker colors or coated with stucco, which would minimize the production of glare. Project impacts related to light and glare would be less than significant.

3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1319
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-4 November 2021
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment that, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site is not used for agricultural production. Lands adjacent to the project site and west of Lower Sacramento Road are vacant or in urban uses and are not used for agriculture; lands east of the project site across Lower Sacramento Road are in use for orchards and row crops.

The Important Farmland Maps, prepared by the California Department of Conservation as part of the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, designate the viability of lands for farmland use, based on the physical and chemical properties of the soils. The maps categorize farmland, in decreasing order of soil quality, as "Prime Farmland," "Farmland of Statewide Importance," "Unique Farmland," and "Farmland of Local Importance." The first three categories are defined as “Farmland” by CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. The 2018 Important Farmland Map of San Joaquin County designates the project site as Farmland of Local Importance (FMMP 2018), which is not a category considered “Farmland” for the purposes of CEQA.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Agricultural Land Conversion.

As noted, the project site is classified as Farmland of Local Importance, which does not meet the definition of Farmland in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G. The project would not convert Farmland and would therefore have no impact on this issue. b) Conflict with Agricultural Zoning or Williamson Act Contract.

The majority of the project site, with the exception of its westernmost tip, is currently zoned by the County for Community Commercial use.APN 070-570-13 and a portion of APN 070- 140-35 is zoned by the County as AU-20, Agriculture-Urban Reserve indicating that the area is planned for future urban development, not for ongoing agricultural use.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1320
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-5 November 2021
The Stockton General Plan 2040 has designates the project site Commercial, indicating that the project site is intended for urban development. The project would have no impact on agricultural zoning.

The Williamson Act preserves agricultural land by means of a contract between the landowner and local government that keeps the contracted land in agricultural use in exchange for a lower property tax assessment. None of the parcels within the project site are under a Williamson Act contract. Project impacts on agricultural zoning or Williamson Act contracts would be less than significant.
c, d) Forest Lands.

The project site is in a mostly developed area; there are no forest lands on the project site or in the vicinity. No land in the project vicinity is zoned as forest land or timberland. The project would have no impact on forest lands.
e) Indirect Conversion of Farmland or Forest Land.

The project site is mostly surrounded by urban development fully served by existing street and utility infrastructure. There is agricultural land to the east, but the project would not involve the extension of infrastructure that may lead to increased pressure to convert these lands. The project would have no impact on indirect conversion of agricultural lands. As noted in c, d) above, there are no forest lands in the vicinity, so the project would have no impact on indirect conversion of forest land.

3.3 AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollutant control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Attainment Plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1321
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-6 November 2021
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site is within the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin. The San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD), which includes San Joaquin County, has jurisdiction over most air quality matters in the Air Basin; vehicle emissions are the responsibility of the California Air Resources Board (ARB). The SJVAPCD is tasked with developing and implementing plans, programs and regulations that would enable the Air Basin to attain ambient air quality standards set under both the federal and California Clean Air Acts. Under their respective Clean Air Acts, both the State of California and the federal government have established ambient air quality standards for six criteria air pollutants: ozone, particulate matter, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead. California has four additional criteria pollutants under its Clean Air Act; none of these pollutants would be generated in the project area.

Table 3-1 shows the current attainment status of the Air Basin relative to the federal and State ambient air quality standards for criteria pollutants. Except for ozone and particulate matter, the Air Basin is in attainment of, or unclassified for, all federal and State ambient air quality standards.

TABLE 3-1

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN ATTAINMENT STATUS
Pollutant
Designation/Classification
Federal Primary Standards State Standards
Ozone - One hour No Federal Standard Nonattainment/Severe Ozone - Eight hour Nonattainment/Extreme Nonattainment
PM10 Attainment Nonattainment
PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment
Carbon Monoxide Attainment/Unclassified Attainment/Unclassified Nitrogen Dioxide Attainment/Unclassified Attainment
Sulfur Dioxide Attainment/Unclassified Attainment
Lead (Particulate) No Designation/Classification Attainment Hydrogen Sulfide No Federal Standard Unclassified
Sulfates No Federal Standard Attainment
Visibility Reducing Particles No Federal Standard Unclassified Vinyl Chloride No Federal Standard Attainment
Source: SJVAPCD 2020.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1322
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-7 November 2021
Ozone is not emitted directly into the air but is formed when reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) react in the atmosphere in the presence of sunlight. The SJVAPCD currently has a 2007 Ozone Plan and a 2013 Plan for the Revoked 1-Hour Ozone Standard for the Air Basin to attain federal ambient air quality standards for ozone.

Particulate matter is a mixture of solid and liquid particles suspended in air, including dust, pollen, soot, smoke, and liquid droplets. In San Joaquin County, particulate matter is generated by a mix of rural and urban sources, including agricultural operations, industrial emissions, dust suspended by vehicle traffic, and secondary aerosols formed by reactions in the atmosphere. Two types of particulate matter are of concern: particulate matter 10 micrometers or less in diameter (PM10), and particulate matter 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter (PM2.5). The SJVAPCD currently has a 2015 PM2.5 Plan for the 1997 federal PM2.5 standard, a 2012 PM2.5 Plan for the 2006 federal PM2.5 standard, a 2016 Moderate Area Plan for the 2012 federal PM2.5 standard, and a 2007 PM10 Maintenance Plan to maintain the Air Basin’s attainment status of the federal PM10 standard.

CO is an odorless, colorless gas that is toxic in high concentrations. It is formed by the incomplete combustion of fuels and is emitted directly into the air, unlike ozone. The main source of CO in the San Joaquin Valley is on-road motor vehicles (SJVAPCD 2015). The San Joaquin Valley Air Basin is in attainment/unclassified status for carbon monoxide (CO); as such, the SJVAPCD has no CO attainment plans. However, high CO concentrations may occur in areas of limited geographic size referred to as “hotspots,” which are ordinarily associated with heavy traffic volumes and congestion.

In addition to the criteria pollutants, the California Air Resources Board has identified other air pollutants as toxic air contaminants (TACs) - pollutants that are carcinogenic (i.e., cause cancer) or that may cause other adverse short-term or long-term health effects. Diesel particulate matter, considered a carcinogen, is the most common TAC, as it is a product of combustion in diesel engines. It is present at some concentration in all developed areas of the state. Other TACs are less common and are typically associated with industrial operations.

As noted, the SJVAPCD is tasked with implementing regulations designed to attain ambient air quality standards. SJVAPCD regulations that are potentially applicable to the project are summarized below.

Regulation VIII (Fugitive Dust PM10 Prohibitions)
Rules 8011-8081 are designed to reduce PM10 emissions (predominantly dust/dirt) generated by human activity, including construction and demolition activities, road construction, bulk materials storage, paved and unpaved roads, carryout and track out, landfill operations, etc.

Rule 4101 (Visible Emissions)
This rule prohibits emissions of visible air contaminants to the atmosphere and applies to any source operation that emits or may emit air contaminants.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1323
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-8 November 2021
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
In 2015, the SJVAPCD adopted a revised Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. The Guide defines an analysis methodology, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures for the assessment of air quality impacts for projects within SJVAPCD’s jurisdiction (SJVAPCD 2015). Table 3-2 shows the CEQA thresholds for significance for pollutant emissions within the SJVAPCD. The significance thresholds apply to construction emissions and to operational emissions.

TABLE 3-2

SJVAPCD SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS

AND PROJECT CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS
Pollutant
SJVAPCD Significance
Threshold (tons/year)
Maximum Construction
Emissions (tons/year)
Operational Emissions
(tons/year)
ROG 100 0.25 0.47
NOx 10 1.37 0.11
CO 10 1.34 0.52
SOx 27 <0.01 <0.01
PM10 15 0.11 0.11
PM2.5 15 0.07 0.03
Sources: CalEEMod 2020.4.0, SJVAPCD 2015.
a) Air Quality Plan Consistency.

The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) was used to estimate both construction and operational emissions associated with the proposed project, based mainly on estimated vehicle trips to and from the project site. The CalEEMod results are shown in Appendix A of this document, and Table 3-2 shows the maximum project construction emissions in a calendar year and the annual operational emissions based on the CalEEMod run. As indicated by Table 3-2, neither project construction emissions nor operational emissions exceed the SJVAPCD significance thresholds. As the significance thresholds were established in part to ensure consistency with the objectives of the air quality plans adopted by the SJVAPCD, project emissions would be consistent with these plans.

While project emissions would not be significant, the project would still be required to comply with applicable SJVAPCD rules and regulations, which would further reduce potential air quality impacts. As noted, SJVAPCD Regulation VIII contains measures to reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction. Dust control provisions are routinely included in site improvement plans and specifications, along with construction contracts.

Implementation of Regulation VIII provisions would further reduce project emission impacts already considered less than significant.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1324
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-9 November 2021
b) Cumulative Emissions.

As noted in a) above, project emissions would not exceed SJVAPCD significance thresholds.

Future attainment of federal and State ambient air quality standards is a function of successful implementation of the SJVAPCD’s attainment plans. Consequently, the application of significance thresholds for criteria pollutants is relevant to the determination of whether a project’s individual emissions would have a cumulatively significant impact on air quality.

Pursuant to the SJVAPCD’s guidance, if project-specific emissions would be less than the thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants, the project would not be expected to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the SJVAPCD is in nonattainment under applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards. As project emissions would not exceed SJVAPCD significance thresholds, the cumulative impacts of these emissions would be less than significant.
c) Exposure of Sensitive Receptors.
“Sensitive receptors” refer to those segments of the population most susceptible to poor air quality (i.e., children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing serious health problems affected by air quality). Land uses where sensitive individuals are most likely to spend time also may be called sensitive receptors; these include schools and schoolyards, parks and playgrounds, daycare centers, nursing homes, hospitals, and residential communities (SJVAPCD 2015). Emissions of pollutants, including TACs, in sufficient concentrations could have adverse health impacts on nearby sensitive receptors.

Residences are located along the northern boundary of the project site, and Podesta Ranch Elementary School is near the site to the west. These sensitive receptors would be exposed to emissions from construction activities, mainly dust. However, these emissions would be temporary and would cease once construction work is completed. Also, as described in a) above, the project would be required to incorporate measures that would reduce fugitive dust emissions from construction activities.

Potential health effects on sensitive receptors occur with long-term exposure to pollutants.

This includes diesel particulate matter, a TAC often associated with construction activities, generated by construction equipment. However, as noted, construction impacts would cease with the completion of project work, and length of exposure time would be short. Impacts of exposure of sensitive receptors to construction emissions would be less than significant.

CO in high concentrations can have adverse health impacts, as previously described. The Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts indicates that a project would create no violations of the CO standards if neither of the following criteria are met (SJVAPCD 2015):
• A traffic study for the project indicates that the Level of Service (LOS) on one or more streets or at one or more intersections in the project vicinity will be reduced to LOS E or F; or
• A traffic study indicates that the project will substantially worsen an already existing LOS F on one or more streets or at one or more intersections in the project vicinity (See Section 3.17, Transportation, for an explanation of LOS).

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1325
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-10 November 2021
While no traffic study was conducted for the project, the CalEEMod run estimates that that the project would contribute approximately 102 vehicle trips per day to local intersections and roadways (see Section 3.17, Transportation, for details on the trip estimate). For comparison, the segment of Lower Sacramento Road adjacent to the project had average daily traffic of 16,340 as of 2017 (City of Stockton 2018a). Therefore, project traffic would not contribute substantially to traffic at the Grider Way/Lower Sacramento Road intersection so that LOS would degrade to LOS E or F or worsen operations at any intersection if it currently operating LOS E or F. Therefore, no CO hotspots resulting from the project are expected to occur. Overall, project impacts on sensitive receptors would be less than significant.
d) Odors and Other Emissions.

The project is not expected to generate significant odors, other than occasional temporary emissions from construction activities. Such emissions would be localized and would dissipate rapidly outside the project site. As noted above, the nearest sensitive receptors would be adjacent residences, which would be exposed only temporarily to construction emissions. Project impacts related to odors and other emissions are considered less than significant.

3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1326
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-11 November 2021
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site is vacant land consisting of bare soils covered with scrub brush. No trees or other significant vegetation are on the project site. There are no streams or bodies of water on or near the project site. The project site is mostly surrounded by urban development. No wildlife was observed on a field visit to the site by BaseCamp staff.

The City participates in the San Joaquin County Multi-Species Open Space and Habitat Conservation Plan (SJMSCP). The SJMSCP, managed by the San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG), is a comprehensive program for assessing and mitigating the biological impacts of converting open space or biologically sensitive lands to urban development in San Joaquin County. It provides three compensation methods: preservation of existing sensitive lands, creation of new comparable habitat on the project site, or payment of fees that would be used to secure preserve lands outside the project site. It also identifies and requires covered projects to abide by Incidental Take Minimization Measures, which are protection measures that avoid direct impacts of development on special-status species (SJCOG 2000). As an alternative, applicants may also provide equivalent mitigation, subject to the review and approval of permitting agencies. The project applicant made application to the SJMSCP in conjunction with project review by San Joaquin County.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Special-Status Species.

Special-status species include plant and/or wildlife species that are legally protected under the federal Endangered Species Act, the California Endangered Species Act, or other laws and regulations, or are considered rare enough by the scientific community and trustee agencies to warrant special consideration. In its review of the project, SJCOG determined that the project could provide habitat for Swainson’s hawk, a species listed as threatened under the California Endangered Species Act, and for western burrowing owl, a State Species of Special Concern. In addition, special-status bird species such as sharp-shinned hawk, yellow warbler, and loggerhead shrike could nest in isolated trees on the project site (SJCOG 2020).

The applicant has paid required SJMSCP habitat fees of $75,363.36, and the SJCOG has issued Incidental Take Minimization Measures for the project that would avoid or minimize impacts on these special-status species. These measures are provided in Appendix B of this Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1327
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-12 November 2021
document. The project is required to comply with these measures, which would reduce project impacts on special-status species to a level that would be less than significant. b) Riparian and Sensitive Habitats.

As noted above, there are no streams or surface waters on or near the project site; therefore, there is no riparian habitat in the vicinity. The project vicinity is adjacent to existing developed areas; no other sensitive habitats were identified in the project vicinity. The project would have no impact on riparian or sensitive habitats. c) State and Federally Protected Wetlands.

Waters of the U.S., including wetlands, are broadly defined under 33 Code of Federal Regulations 328 to include navigable waterways, their tributaries, and adjacent wetlands. “Waters of the State”, subject to oversight by the SWRCB and by the RWQCB with jurisdiction over the affected water, include isolated wetlands not covered by federal regulations. There are no wetlands, streams or other surface waters on or near the project site, which is located in a predominantly developed urban area. The nearest potential wetland areas are along the alignments of Bear Creek, approximately 500 feet to the south, and Pixley Slough, approximately 4,000 feet to the north. The project would have no physical impact on either stream, both of which are contained within levees. The project would have no impact on state or federally protected wetlands.
d) Fish and Wildlife Movement.

As noted, there are no streams on or near the project site, so the project would not affect fish or other species that may use streams as movement corridors. Given the nearby urban development and lack of natural habitat, it is unlikely that the project site would be used as a wildlife corridor. However, the SJCOG noted that potential nesting habitat is available for common birds that may be protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (SJCOG 2020).

Disruption of active nests or nesting behaviors of migratory birds by project construction would be a potentially significant impact.

The SJCOG has issued Incidental Take Minimization Measures for the project that would avoid or minimize impacts on migratory birds (see Appendix B). The project shall comply with these measures, which would reduce project impacts on nesting birds to a level that would be less than significant.
e) Local Biological Resource Requirements.

Stockton Municipal Code Chapter 16.130 addresses Heritage Trees, which are any valley oak, coast live oak, and interior live oak tree with a trunk diameter of 16 inches or more, measured at 24 inches above actual grade. No Heritage Trees have been identified on the project site. The City has no other applicable local biological resource requirements. The project would have no impact on local biological resource requirements.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1328
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-13 November 2021
f) Conflict with Habitat Conservation Plans.

As noted, the City participates in the SJMSCP. The project has been reviewed by SJCOG.

The project applicant has paid the required development fees to SJCOG, and SJCOG has issued Incidental Take Minimization Measures that the project shall implement. No other habitat conservation plans apply to the project site. The project would have no impact related to habitat conservation plans.

3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred
outside of formal cemeteries?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
Stockton has more than 1,900 recorded cultural resources, ranging from prehistoric habitation sites to mid-20th century developments (City of Stockton 2018b). The project site is generally considered to be in Northern Valley Yokuts territory. Section 3.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, discusses potential project impacts on tribal cultural resources.

Euro-American contact began with infrequent excursions by Spanish explorers traveling through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valleys in the late 1700s to early 1800s. The Spanish, and later Mexican, governments of California tried to encourage settlement by awarding large plots of land, called ranchos, to prominent men. The project site was part of one such grant, Charles M. Weber’s El Campo de los Franceses. Weber founded the City of Stockton in 1850, and the City incorporated that same year. No cultural resource studies specific to the project site were conducted.

Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.36.050 states that if a historical or archaeological resource or human remains may be impacted by a development project requiring a discretionary land use permit, the Secretary of the Cultural Heritage Board shall be notified, any survey needed to determine the significance of the resource shall be conducted, and the proper environmental documents shall be prepared. In addition:

A. Historical Resources. Resources that have been identified as a landmark or part of a historic district in compliance with Chapter 16.220 (Cultural Resources) shall Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1329
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-14 November 2021
require a certificate of appropriateness (Section 16.220.060) if any exterior changes to the resource are proposed.

B. Archaeological Resources. In the event that archaeological resources are discovered during any construction, construction activities shall cease, and the Community Development Department (Department) shall be notified so that the extent and location of discovered materials may be recorded by a qualified archaeologist, and disposition of artifacts may occur in compliance with State and federal law.

C. Human Remains. In the event human remains are discovered during any construction, construction activities shall cease, and the County Coroner and Director shall be notified immediately in compliance with CEQA Guidelines 15064.5(d). A qualified archaeologist shall be contacted to evaluate the situation.

If the human remains are of Native American origin, the Coroner shall notify the NAHC [Native American Heritage Commission] within 24 hours of this identification. The NAHC will identify the most likely descendent of the Native American to inspect the site and provide recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated grave goods.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Historical Resources.

The Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan EIR stated that Stockton has over 1,900 recorded cultural resources ranging from prehistoric habitation sites to mid-20th century developments.

These resources include those registered in the National Register of Historic Places and the California Register of Historical Resources (City of Stockton 2018b). None of these resources were identified at the project site. Given the lack of any structures on the project site, project impacts on historical resources are considered to be less than significant. b) Archaeological Resources.

There are no known archaeological resources on the project site. However, it is conceivable that excavation associated with the project could unearth archaeological materials that are currently unknown. This was a concern expressed by one of the local tribes (see Section 3.18, Tribal Cultural Resources). Procedures to address archaeological discoveries if they should occur are set forth in the mitigation measure below, consistent with Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.36.050. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce cultural resource impacts to a level that would be less than significant.

Level of Significance: Potentially significant
Mitigation Measures:

CULT-1: If any subsurface archaeological resources are encountered during construction, all construction activities within a 50-foot radius of the encounter shall be immediately halted until a qualified archaeologist can examine these materials, initially evaluate their significance and, if Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1330
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-15 November 2021
potentially significant, recommend measures on the disposition of the resource. The City shall be immediately notified in the event of a discovery. The contractor shall be responsible for retaining qualified professionals, implementing recommended mitigation measures, and documenting mitigation efforts in written reports to the City.

Recommended measures could include, but are not limited to, 1) preservation in place, or 2) excavation, recovery, and curation by qualified professionals.

Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant
c) Human Burials.

Given development of the project site and vicinity, it is unlikely that any intact human burials would be encountered. However, should any human remains be encountered during project construction, construction activities could have a potentially significant adverse impact, especially if the remains are of Native American origin.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(e) sets forth procedures to be followed should any human remains be uncovered, with special requirements for burials determined to be Native American. Also, Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.36.050 has provisions related to the discovery and disposition of human remains. Compliance with these regulations would reduce impacts related to human burials to a level that would be less than significant. Refer to Section 3.18, Tribal Cultural Resources, for a discussion of potential impacts on tribal cultural resources, including Native American burials.

3.6 ENERGY
Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Result in potentially significant environmental impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for
renewable energy or energy efficiency?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
Electricity is a major energy source for residences and businesses in California. In San Joaquin County, based upon the most recent information available, electricity consumption in 2019 totaled approximately 5,583 million kilowatt-hours, of which approximately 1,893 million kilowatt-hours were consumed by residential uses and the remainder by nonExhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1331 Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-16 November 2021
residential uses (CEC 2021a). In 2019, natural gas consumption in San Joaquin County totaled approximately 259 million therms, of which approximately 89 million therms were consumed by residential uses and the remainder by non-residential uses (CEC 2021b). Motor vehicle use also accounts for substantial energy usage. The SJCOG estimated countywide daily VMT was 17,868,785 miles in 2015, which led to the consumption of approximately 511 million gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel (SJCOG 2018).

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Project Energy Consumption.

Project construction would involve fuel consumption and use of other non-renewable resources. Construction equipment used for such improvements typically runs on diesel fuel or gasoline. The same fuels typically are used for vehicles that transport equipment and workers to and from a construction site. Construction-related fuel consumption would be finite, short-term, and consistent with construction activities of a similar character. This energy use would not be considered wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary.

Electricity may be used for equipment operation during construction activities. It is expected that more electrical construction equipment would be used in the future, since it generates no air pollutants. Electrical consumption by this equipment would be consistent with construction activities of a similar character; therefore, the use of electricity in construction activities would not be considered wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary, especially since fossil fuel consumption would be reduced.

Project operations are expected to use little energy. The main energy use associated with project operations would be vehicle trips to and from the project site and security lighting.

As mentioned in Section 3.3, Air Quality, the project is expected to generate approximately 102 trips daily, so vehicle fuel consumption would not be substantial. As noted in Section

3.1, Aesthetics, the Stockton Municipal Code requires energy-efficient exterior lighting.

Streetlights installed as part of the project are not expected to consume energy in a manner considered wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary. Project impacts related to energy consumption are considered less than significant.
b) Consistency with Energy Plans.

The City does not have adopted plans for renewable energy or energy efficiency. However, as discussed in a) above, the project is not expected to lead to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy. Project impacts related to energy plans would be less than significant.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1332
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-17 November 2021

3.7 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.)
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site in the San Joaquin Valley in central California near the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The San Joaquin Valley is filled with thick sedimentary rock sequences that were deposited as much as 130 million years ago. The sediments that form the Valley floor were derived largely from erosion of the Sierra Nevada. The Geologic Map of the Sacramento Quadrangle designates the underlying geology of the project site as the Modesto Formation (Wagner et al. 1981). The Modesto Formation, ranging in depth from 10 to 200 feet, consists primarily of sand, silt, and clay seams deposited by rivers (DWR 2014).

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1333
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-18 November 2021
The topography of the project site is essentially flat. A custom soil survey downloaded from the Natural Resources Conservation Service website indicates there is only one soil type underlying the project site: Jacktone clay, 0 to 2 percent slopes. This is a somewhat poorly drained soil also formed in alluvium from mixed rock sources, and it is moderately deep to a hardpan. Permeability and runoff of Jacktone clay are slow, and the water erosion hazard is slight. The expansive (“shrink-swell”) potential of this soil is high (SCS 1992; NRCS 2021).

There are no active or potentially active faults in the Stockton vicinity. The Stockton Fault is a south-dipping reverse fault that trends east-west across the Stockton area, but it has not been classified as an active fault by the California Geological Survey. The nearest active fault is the Greenville Fault, approximately 22 miles west-southwest of Stockton (City of Stockton 2018b). Portions of the Concord-Green Valley and Hayward fault zones, 35 and 50 miles west of Stockton, and the Calaveras fault zone, approximately 40 miles southwest of Stockton, have also been rated as active within the last 200 years. The project site, along with the rest of San Joaquin County, is subject to seismic shaking from these fault zones, as well as the San Andreas Fault farther to the west (San Joaquin County 2016).

Paleontological resources are fossils or groups of fossils that are unique, unusual, rare, uncommon, or important, and those that add to an existing body of knowledge in specific areas. Only a handful of specimens are within the Planning Area of the Stockton General Plan, and those have been identified as relatively recent (City of Stockton 2018b).

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a-i) Fault Rupture Hazards.

As noted, there are no active or potentially active faults within or near the project site. The project site is not within or near a designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (California Geological Survey 2017). The project would have no impact related to fault rupture.
a-ii) Seismic Ground Shaking.

The project site is potentially subject to seismic shaking from active faults outside San Joaquin County. Project development must comply with applicable provisions of the adopted California Building Code, which includes seismic safety provisions that minimize ground shaking impacts. Implementation of the seismic provisions of the California Building Code would reduce project impacts related to ground shaking to a level that would be less than significant.
a-iii) Seismic-Related Ground Failure.

Geologic hazards include such phenomena as liquefaction and subsidence. Liquefaction generally occurs in areas where moist, fine-grained, cohesionless sediment or fill materials are subjected to strong seismic ground shaking. Under certain circumstances, seismic ground shaking can temporarily transform an otherwise solid, granular material to a fluid state.

Neither the California Geological Survey nor the U.S. Geological Survey has mapped any Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1334
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-19 November 2021
liquefaction hazard zones in the Stockton area (City of Stockton 2018b). Soils on the project site are clayey in nature.

Subsidence is the sinking of a large area of ground surface in which the material is displaced vertically downward, with little or no horizontal movement. Subsidence is not anticipated outside of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area, of which the project site is not a part.

Impacts related to ground failure would be less than significant. a-iv) Landslides.

The project site is in a topographically flat area; as such, landslides would not occur. The project would have no impact related to landslides.
b) Soil Erosion.

The construction and grading associated with site preparation and construction of the project would temporarily increase the exposure of soils on the project site to water and wind erosion. Since construction activities are anticipated to disturb at least one acre of land area, the project would need to obtain a Construction General Permit from the SWRCB. The Construction General Permit would require preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a Qualified SWPPP Developer. The SWPPP would include implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to avoid or minimize adverse water quality impacts from erosion and sedimentation. BMPs fall within the categories of Temporary Soil Stabilization, Temporary Sediment Control, Wind Erosion Control, Tracking Control, Non-Storm Water Management, and Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control.

In addition, the City has a Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP) that requires implementation of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) for erosion control, including limitations on disturbance and temporary soil stabilization through the use of mulch, seeding, soil stabilizers, and fiber rolls and blankets (see Section 3.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, for more information on the SWMP). Dust control measures noted in Section

3.3, Air Quality, would reduce potential wind erosion impacts of the project. With implementation of these measures, project impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant.
c) Geologic Instability.

Existing soil and geological conditions on the project site are similar to those throughout most of the Stockton area. The project site and vicinity are topographically flat, so no landslides or lateral spreading would occur. As noted in a-iii) above, subsidence and liquefaction are unlikely to occur. The project would be constructed in accordance with the California Building Code, which has provisions designed to ensure stability of structures.

The project would have no impact related to geological instability. d) Expansive Soils.

As noted, Jacktone clay has a relatively high shrink-swell potential. Compliance with existing State and local laws and regulations such as the California Building Code and the Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1335
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-20 November 2021
Stockton Municipal Code, along with the City’s grading and building permit process, would ensure that the impacts associated with development on expansive soils are minimized to the extent practicable, reducing impacts to a level that would be less than significant. e) Adequacy of Soils for Sewage Disposal.

The project proposes to connect to the City of Stockton’s wastewater collection system. As such, no onsite sewage disposal systems would be installed, so adequacy of soils for such systems is irrelevant. The project would have no impact related to soil adequacy for sewage disposal.
f) Paleontological Resources.

As noted, only a handful of paleontological specimens have been found within the Stockton area. However, records of vertebrate fossils have been related to the Modesto Formation, which underlies the project site. Given project site development and the lack of resources identified in the Stockton area, it is unlikely that intact paleontological resources would be encountered. However, it is conceivable that currently unknown paleontological resources could be uncovered during project construction that involves deeper excavation. Mitigation described below would require work to be stopped when paleontological resources are uncovered until these resources can be evaluated by a qualified paleontologist and recommendations made for their proper disposition. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce paleontological resource impacts to a level that would be less than significant.

Level of Significance: Potentially significant
Mitigation Measures:

GEO-1: If buried paleontological resources are inadvertently discovered during ground-disturbing activities, work shall stop within 50 feet of the find until a qualified paleontologist can examine these materials, initially evaluate their significance and, if potentially significant, recommend measures on the disposition of the resource. The City shall be immediately notified in the event of a discovery. Prior to construction, construction personnel shall receive brief “tailgate” training by a qualified archaeologist in the identification of paleontological resources and protocol for notification should such resources be discovered during construction work.

Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1336
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-21 November 2021

3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
A greenhouse gas (GHG) is a gas that absorbs and emits radiation within the thermal infrared range, trapping heat in the earth’s atmosphere. There are several types of GHGs, which are both naturally occurring and generated by human activity. Increased atmospheric concentrations of GHGs are considered a primary contributor to global climate change, which is a subject of concern for the State of California. Potential climate change impacts occurring in the San Joaquin Valley include more intense and frequent heat waves, higher frequency of catastrophic floods, more intense and frequent drought, and more severe and frequent wildfires (Westerling et al. 2018).

GHG emissions in California in 2018, the most recent year for which data are available, were estimated at approximately 425 million metric tons CO2e – a decrease of approximately 13% from the peak level in 2004. Transportation was the largest contributor to GHG emissions in California, with approximately 40% of total emissions. Other significant sources include industrial activities, with approximately 21% of total emissions, and electric power generation, both in-state and imported, with approximately 15% of total emissions (ARB 2020). Total GHG emissions from Stockton in 2005 were an estimated 2,360,932 metric tons CO2e. Of the total emissions, approximately 48% percent came from on-road transportation and 33% came from building energy use (City of Stockton 2014).

The State of California has implemented GHG emission reduction strategies through AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which requires total statewide GHG emissions to reach 1990 levels by 2020, or an approximately 29% reduction from 2004 levels. In 2016, Senate Bill (SB) 32 became law. SB 32 extends the GHG reduction objectives of AB 32 by mandating statewide reductions in GHG emissions to levels that are 40% below 1990 levels by the year 2030. The State has adopted an updated Scoping Plan that sets forth strategies for achieving the SB 32 target, which is 260 million metric tons CO2e. The updated Scoping Plan continues many of the programs that were part of the previous Scoping Plans, including the cap-and-trade program, low-carbon fuel standards, renewable energy, and methane reduction strategies, along with a proposed 20% reduction in GHG emissions from refineries.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1337
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-22 November 2021
It also addresses for the first time GHG emissions from the natural and working lands of California, including the agriculture and forestry sectors (ARB 2017).

The City of Stockton adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in 2014. The CAP sets a GHG emission reduction target of 10% below 2005 GHG emission levels by 2020, or approximately 20.6% below 2020 “business as usual” GHG emissions (i.e., 2020 GHG emissions that are unmitigated), which is the level by which the State has set its emission reduction goal. Approximately 83% of the reductions needed to achieve the City’s GHG reduction goal are achieved through state‐level programs, and 17% are achieved through City‐level programs. The largest GHG reductions identified are in building energy (both energy efficiency and renewable energy), transportation, and waste (City of Stockton 2014).

At this time, the City’s CAP has not set any GHG reduction targets beyond 2020, although the City is planning to update its community GHG inventory.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a, b) Project GHG Emissions and Consistency with GHG Reduction Plans.

Estimates of GHG emissions of the project were developed using the CalEEMod program (see Section 3.3, Air Quality). Table 3-3 presents the results of the CalEEMod run.

TABLE 3-3

PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS
GHG Emission Type
Unmitigated Emissions
(metric tons CO2e)
Mitigated Emissions
(metric tons CO2e)
Construction1 234.5 234.5
Operational2 273.3 223.7
1 Total GHG emissions for construction period.
2 Annual emissions.

Source: California Emissions Estimator Model v. 2020.4.0. “Mitigated emissions” are the result of project compliance with applicable laws, rules, and regulations, along with inclusion of project features that reduce GHG emissions. These include the following:
• Increase in diversity of land uses.
• The project site is approximately 0.6 miles from a transit stop. • The project site is approximately six miles from downtown Stockton. • The project would add sidewalks to the site.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1338
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-23 November 2021
• SB X7-7, enacted in 2009, sets an overall goal of reducing per capita urban water use by 20% by December 31, 2020. The California Green Building Code mandates a 20% reduction in indoor water use.
• AB 341 establishes the goal of diverting 75% of California’s waste stream from landfills by 2020.

GHG construction emissions would be limited due to the length of time of construction activity; these emissions would cease once work is completed. Mitigated operational GHG emissions would be approximately 18.2% less than under business-as-usual (unmitigated) conditions.

The City does not have current GHG reduction objectives, which are in the process of being updated. For the purposes of this document, analysis of project impacts will be based on the provisions of the 2017 State Scoping Plan related to 2030 reduction targets. The Scoping Plan proposes various measures to achieve the 2030 target, most of which are State measures, such as use of the cap-and-trade program, the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Plan, and achievement of the 50% renewable sources of electricity in the Renewables Portfolio Standard (see Section 3.6, Energy). Based on estimates in the 2017 Scoping Plan, State actions would account for 89.8% of GHG reductions needed by 2030, with local actions accounting for approximately 9.3% of reductions.

Applying this ratio to the percentage reduction for 2030, approximately 6.0% of the reduction from 2030 business-as-usual levels would be achieved by local measures, including the Development Review Process. Therefore, a project that can show GHG reductions greater than 6.0% can be said to be consistent with the reduction goals of SB 32. As noted, project GHG operational emissions would be approximately 18.2% less than business-as-usual levels, which would exceed the 6.0% local reduction share. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the reduction goals of SB 32.

The State of California has comprehensive GHG regulatory requirements, with laws and regulations requiring reductions that affect project emissions. The project is subject to several State regulations applicable to project design, construction, and operation that would reduce GHG emissions, increase energy efficiency, and ensure compliance with the Climate Change Scoping Plan (ARB 2017). Legal mandates to reduce GHG emissions from vehicles, for example, would reduce project-related vehicular emissions. Other mandates that would reduce GHG emissions include reducing per capita water consumption and imposing waste management standards to reduce methane and other GHGs from solid wastes. Also, as discussed in Section 3.6, Energy, the project would be subject to codes that require energy efficiency measures, which would reduce the amount of electricity produced by fossil fuels – a major source of GHG emissions.

Based on the information provided above, the project would be consistent with GHG reduction plans of the State and with the County General Plan policy on mitigation of GHG emissions. Project impacts related to consistency with GHG emission reduction plans would be less than significant.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1339
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-24 November 2021

3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
Hazardous material sites of all statuses are recorded in the GeoTracker database, maintained by the SWRCB, and the EnviroStor database, maintained by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (SWRCB 2021, DTSC 2021a). A search of both databases revealed no active hazardous material sites are recorded on the project site or in the project vicinity. The EnviroStor database recorded one cleanup of a nearby site – Podesta Ranch Elementary School. Soil samples taken on the school site, prior to school construction, indicated elevated levels of lead and chlordane (a pesticide) associated with past agricultural uses of the area.

A Removal Action Workplan for the site was approved in 2007 and implemented and Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1340
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-25 November 2021
completed the same year. In 2008, DTSC determined the removal action was completed and that no further action was required (DTSC 2021b).

There is no existing testing data for the site, and no site-specific Environmental Site Assessment has been completed for the site.

Various federal and State laws and regulations cover the transportation, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials. The Unified Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Management Regulatory Program, enacted in 1993, is a state and local effort to consolidate, coordinate, and make consistent existing programs regulating hazardous waste and managing hazardous materials. The Unified Program is implemented at the local level by a Certified Unified Program Agency. The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department was approved by the State as the Certified Unified Program Agency for the County and its incorporated cities. The County Environmental Health Department has the primary responsibility to enforce most regulations regarding hazardous materials in the area, while the Stockton Fire Department Hazardous Materials Team acts as first responder to hazardous material incidents.

A list of solid waste disposal sites identified by SWRCB with waste constituents above hazardous waste levels outside the waste management unit did not show any locations in the County (CalEPA 2021a). Likewise, a list by SWRCB containing sites under Cease and Desist Orders and Cleanup and Abatement Orders showed no locations on or near the project site (CalEPA 2021b).

The nearest public use airport to the project site is Lodi Airpark, approximately 2.6 miles to the north. Lodi Airpark does not offer scheduled passenger air service. An Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) for Lodi Airpark and other County airports, except for Stockton Metropolitan Airport, was adopted by the County in 2009. The ALUCP delineated safety zones surrounding the airport and identified compatible land use for each safety zone.

It also identified an Airport Influence Area, which identifies an area within which development projects are subject to review by the County Airport Land Use Commission.

SACOG functions as the County Airport Land Use Commission.

Wildfires are a potential hazard in many parts of San Joaquin County. High hazard areas in the County for wildland fires are the grass-covered areas in the east and the southwest foothills (San Joaquin County 2016a). The project site is not within these areas. Section 3.20, Wildfire, discusses wildfire issues in more detail.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Hazardous Material Transportation, Use, and Storage.

The project proposes development of a self-storage facility. Hazardous materials that are likely to be used and stored on the project site would include cleaning products used as a part of facility maintenance. None of these hazardous materials would be stored or used in large quantities. Hazardous materials storage by storge unit renters will be prohibited by site management.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1341
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-26 November 2021
Facilities that store significant amounts of hazardous materials are required to prepare a Hazardous Material Business Plan that would be submitted to the County Environmental Health Department. The Hazardous Material Business Plan must be prepared by any facility that handles a hazardous material, or mixture containing a hazardous material, of a quantity at any one time during the reporting year equal to or greater than 55 gallons for liquids, 500 pounds for solids, or 200 cubic feet for a compressed gas. None of the hazardous materials to be used by the project are anticipated to be handled or stored in such quantities.

An Administrative Use Permit in compliance with Stockton Municipal Code Chapter 16.172 is required for any new commercial, industrial, institutional, or accessory use, or major addition (over 10 percent) to an existing use within 1,000 feet of a residential zoning district that involves the manufacture, storage, handling, or processing of hazardous materials in sufficient quantities that would require permits as hazardous materials. The project does not seek an Administrative Use Permit for the storage of hazardous materials.

Project impacts related to transport, use, or storage of hazardous materials would be less than significant.
b) Upset and Accident Conditions.

Construction activities on the project site may involve the use of hazardous materials typical for such activities, such as fuels and solvents, and thus create a potential for hazardous material spills. Construction and maintenance vehicles would transport and use fuels in ordinary quantities. Fuel spills, if any occur, would be minimal and would not typically have significant adverse effects. In accordance with SWPPP requirements (see Section 3.7, Geology and Soils), contractors have absorbent materials at construction sites to clean up minor spills. As noted in a) above, no hazardous materials would be used or stored in large quantities at the project site once construction work is completed. Project impacts related to potential upset or accident conditions would be less than significant. c) Release of Hazardous Materials near Schools.

The Podesta Ranch Elementary School is within one-quarter mile of the project site.

However, as noted in a) above, the project would not involve use or storage of hazardous materials in large quantities. As noted in b) above, localized spills of hazardous materials could occur during project construction. Any such spills would be cleaned up as they occur, and the hazardous materials used during project construction are not considered acutely hazardous. Construction work occurring near the school would not be prolonged and would cease once work is completed. Project impacts on releases of hazardous materials near schools would be less than significant.
d) Hazardous Material Sites.

As noted, a search of the GeoTracker and EnviroStor databases, along with SWRCB lists, did not identify any active hazardous material sites on or near the project site. As was documented at the nearby Podesta school site, elevated levels of agricultural chemical residues remain from past agricultural activities, which could also be the case on the project site. A review of historical Google Earth photographs of the project site does not indicate any agricultural use for approximately 30 years. However unlikely, agricultural chemical Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1342
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-27 November 2021
residues may exist on the site, and project impacts related to hazardous material sites would be potentially significant.

Level of Significance: Potentially significant
Mitigation Measures:

HAZ-1: Prior to final site plan approval, the project applicant shall retain a qualified environmental professional to conduct soil testing to determine the potential presence of soil contamination on the project site. If testing reveals hazardous levels of agricultural chemical residues, the environmental professional shall make recommendations for remediation needed to reduce contamination to acceptable levels for the proposed land use. Recommendations shall be implemented by the applicant.

Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant
e) Public Airports.

As noted, the nearest public airport, Lodi Airpark, is approximately 2.6 miles to the north.

The project site is not within any of the airport’s safety zones, and it is outside the Airport Influence Area, as indicated in the ALUCP for the airport (Coffman Associates 2009). The project would not place residents or businesses in an area potentially subject to hazards from airport operations. The project would have no impact related to public airports. f) Emergency Response and Evacuations.

The project would not obstruct any public street once construction is completed. Project construction work would mostly occur on the project site. The project would involve improvement of the frontage of Grider Way and connections to buried utility lines beneath this road. However, Grider Way is a relatively narrow two-lane road, and any construction work done in this road could significantly restrict traffic flow and access for emergency vehicles. Mitigation presented below would require pre-construction planning to ensure that access would be maintained during project construction thereby reducing impacts to a level that would be less than significant.

Level of Significance: Potentially significant
Mitigation Measures:

HAZ-2: Prior to the start of project construction, the applicant’s contractor shall prepare and implement a Traffic Control Plan, which shall include such items as traffic control requirements, public notification of access closure, and daily access restoration. The contractor shall specify dates and times of road closures or restrictions, if any, and shall ensure that adequate access will be provided for emergency vehicles. The Traffic Control Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Department of Public Works Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1343
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-28 November 2021
and shall be coordinated with the Stockton Fire and Police Departments if construction will require road closures or lane restrictions.

Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant
g) Wildland Fire Hazards.

The project site is within a developed urban area. There are no wildlands on or near the project site. Moreover, the proposed development, with its buildings and pavement, would eliminate the existing fire hazard of the site by eliminating existing brush cover. The project would have no impact related to wildland fire hazards. Section 3.20, Wildfire, discusses this issue in more detail.

3.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the
basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river runoff or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1344
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-29 November 2021
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project vicinity is a developed area that is covered mostly with impervious surfaces, with the exception of agricultural lands to the east, east of Lower Sacramento Road. There are no surface streams or other bodies of water on or adjacent to the project site. The nearest surface water is Bear Creek, approximately 500 feet to the south of the site (see Section 3.4, Biological Resources).

The project site is within the Eastern San Joaquin County Groundwater Subbasin of the San Joaquin Valley Groundwater Basin. According to the most recent information available, groundwater in the project area is approximately 40 feet below ground surface (San Joaquin County FCD 2018). Recharge to the groundwater system in the Stockton area primarily is from percolation of irrigation return water, precipitation, seepage from reservoirs and rivers, and urban runoff.

In 2014, the California Legislature passed the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act, part of which requires Groundwater Sustainability Plans for critically overdrafted basins to be adopted by January 31, 2020. The Eastern San Joaquin County Groundwater Subbasin is designated a critically overdrafted basin, and a Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Subbasin was submitted to the California Department of Water Resources on January 29, 2020. The goal of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan is to achieve sustainable groundwater management of the Subbasin on a long-term average basis by increasing recharge and/or reducing groundwater pumping, while avoiding undesirable results such as degraded water quality and declining groundwater levels. The Subbasin will achieve sustainability by implementing water supply projects such as direct and in-lieu recharge, intra-basin water transfers, demand conservation, water recycling, and stormwater reuse (ESJGA 2019).

Potential flooding hazards are designated on maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). FEMA maps focus on areas potentially subject to inundation by a 100-year flood (i.e., a flood of such magnitude that occurs on average once every 100 years). According to FEMA Map Panel 06077C0315F, the project site is in Zone X (FEMA 2009). Zone X indicates the project site is at reduced risk from a 100-year flood due to a levee. The project site is not within a 100-year floodplain, which is considered a Special Flood Hazard Area.

SB 5 and related State legislation requires future development to consider the 200-year flood event (i.e., a flood of such magnitude that occurs on average once every 200 years) within certain Central Valley geographies, with a focus on areas subject to a 200-year flood of three feet or more in depth. Based on information in the Stockton General Plan, the project site would not be subject to a 200-year flood at a depth of three feet or greater (City of Stockton 2018a).

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1345
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-30 November 2021
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Surface Waters and Water Quality.

As noted above, there are no streams or other bodies of water on or near the project site.

Project construction, with associated ground disturbance, could lead to the conveyance of sediments in storm water; such sediments would be directed to the City storm drainage system and potentially to surface waters. As described in Section 3.7, Geology and Soils, construction that causes one acre of ground disturbance or more is required to obtain a Construction General Permit, which contains provisions designed to reduce impacts on water quality.

Storm water regulation is established in the area-wide municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) permit system, administered by the SWRCB. The City of Stockton has adopted and currently implements its MS4 program in accordance with Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Order No. R5-2016-0040-2. As part of its MS4 program, the City has adopted a SWMP (see Section 3.7, Geology and Soils). The SWMP addresses the storm water quality effects of development, including construction and post-construction activity.

It consists of a variety of programs, including controls on illicit discharges, public education, controls on City operations, and water quality monitoring (City of Stockton 2009). Project design is required to be consistent with the City’s MS4 program, so the project is not expected to significantly affect water quality once it is completed.

The project would be constructed in an area that is already developed and paved, with storm drainage systems in place. Proposed building and paving would reduce existing percolation of runoff and associated groundwater recharge. Loss of recharge would be offset by SWMP requirements to reduce the volume of runoff during storm events in conjunction with water quality protection. Because of this, the project is not expected to contribute adversely to surface or groundwater quality effects. Project impacts on surface and groundwater quality would be less than significant.
b) Groundwater Supplies and Recharge.

The project would require only minimal use of water; therefore, it would not place substantial demands on surface or groundwater supplies used by the City or other agencies. The proposed project would increase the impervious surface area on the site. However, the project would comply with City requirements regarding storm water, including Low Impact Development approaches and applicable Best Management Practices, consistent with the requirements of the General Plan and GPEIR. Project impacts on groundwater recharge would be less than significant.
c-i, ii) Drainage Patterns.

The project site is currently undeveloped and generally flat. There is no indication of any defined drainage patterns on the site. Proposed development of the project site would alter existing storm drainage patterns, due to grading and the installation of pavement and storm drainage facilities. As part of its MS4 program, the City has adopted a SWMP that addresses the storm water quality effects of development, including construction and post-construction Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1346
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-31 November 2021
activity. Project design is required to be consistent with the City’s MS4 program, so alterations of drainage patterns are not expected to cause onsite or offsite erosion or siltation, nor would it cause onsite or offsite flooding. Project impacts related to drainage patterns would be less than significant.
c-iii) Runoff.

As noted in c-i, -ii) above, the project would change runoff peak flows and volumes, due to the introduction of impervious surfaces such as buildings and parking areas. The City has adopted a Storm Water Quality Control Criteria Plan that identifies a range of postconstruction BMPs that must be incorporated into development plans. BMPs include provisions for control of storm water volumes such that peak existing discharges are not exceeded. Volume control can be achieved through a combination of low-impact development and specific volume control measures. Post-construction BMP requirements are contained in City ordinances that require compliance with the plan. Compliance with the provisions of the Storm Water Quality Control Criteria Plan, including all applicable BMPs, would reduce impacts related to runoff to a level that would be less than significant. c-iv) Flooding Hazards.

As noted, the FEMA map for the project site designates the site within Zone X, which indicates the project site is at reduced risk from a 100-year flood due to a levee. FEMA generally designates areas at risk from a 100-year flood within Zone A or a variant thereof.

Since the project site is not within Zone A, it is not considered by FEMA standards to be within a Special Flood Hazard Area. Also as noted, the project site is not within a designated 200-year floodplain that would flood at least three feet in depth. The project would not change existing flood risks. The project would have no impact related to flooding hazards. d) Release of Pollutants in Flood, Tsunami, or Seiche Zones.

As described in c-iv) above, the project site is not within a 100-year floodplain or a 200-year floodplain that would flood to a depth of at least three feet. The project is not near any large bodies of water, so it would not be subject to seiches or tsunamis. The project would not introduce any large quantities of hazardous materials (see Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials), and flood flows are unlikely to occur. The project would have no impact related to release of pollutants in flood, tsunami, or seiche zones. e) Conflicts with Water Quality or Groundwater Management Plans.

As noted in a) above, the project would be subject to the City’s MS4 permit program, which is designed to minimize impacts on water quality. As noted in b) above, the project would not affect groundwater resources or supplies, so the project would not affect implementation of the Groundwater Sustainability Plan for the Eastern San Joaquin Subbasin nor hinder the attainment of its objectives. Project impacts related to water quality or groundwater management plans would be less than significant.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1347
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-32 November 2021

3.11 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site is currently vacant land except for its southern portion, which is occupied by two commercial buildings. It is bounded on the north and west by existing residential development. East of the project site is Lower Sacramento Road, a two-lane roadway. South of and adjacent to the project site is Grider Way, a two-lane local street.

The project vicinity consists of residential development to the north and west, along with Podesta Ranch Elementary School. To the south, across Grider Way, are two more commercial buildings, both occupied, and vacant land. To the east, across Lower Sacramento Road, is the Lower Sacramento Plaza commercial development, and beyond that is agricultural land.

The project site is currently within the jurisdiction of San Joaquin County. As such, the project site is subject to the San Joaquin County General Plan. The County General Plan provides guidance to future development of lands within unincorporated San Joaquin County. The project site is currently designated by the County General Plan as AgriculturalUrban Reserve. This designation generally applies to areas currently undeveloped or used for agricultural production that are in the logical path of development around an Urban Community or City Fringe Area. This designation may be applied to areas adjacent to cities and in City Fringe Areas if: 1) the area identified is designated for urban development in a city general plan, and 2) the County determines that the area represents a reasonable expansion of a city. The project site is subject to the County’s existing zoning. The current County zoning of the majority of the project site is C-C - Community Commercial. As noted in Section 3.2, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, APN 070-570-13 and a portion of APN 070-140-35 is zoned by the County as AU-20, Agriculture-Urban Reserve. The County granted the project Site Approval (Application #PA2000188) effective May 1, 2021 subject to conditions.

The project site is within the Planning Area of the Stockton General Plan 2040, the City’s Urban Service Boundary, and its 10-Year Planning Horizon Area. The Stockton General Plan 2040 designates the project site as Commercial. As part of the proposed annexation, the City proposes to pre-zone the project site as CG (Commercial, General). The CG zone is Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1348
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-33 November 2021
consistent with the Commercial land use designation of the Stockton General Plan 2040. It is applied to areas appropriate for a wide variety of general commercial uses, including retail, personal and business services; commercial recreational uses; and a mix of office, commercial, and/or residential uses. The proposed self-storage facility is an allowed use in the CG zone with approval of an Administrative Use Permit (Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.20.020).

The San Joaquin LAFCo is the responsible agency for proposed reorganizations for cities and special districts within San Joaquin County; as such, it would review and decide on the proposed annexation of the project site. LAFCo’s review encompasses the consistency of the project with State statutes and policies, particularly the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act, as well as its own adopted policies. In determining the appropriateness of a proposed annexation, LAFCo considers if the project would constitute a logical expansion of a city boundary and if a proposed annexation area would be provided with public utilities and services in an efficient manner. LAFCo’s policies with respect to proposed annexations are specified in its Change of Organization Policies and Procedures, adopted in 2007 and subsequently amended (San Joaquin LAFCo 2012). As an agency with approval authority over the project, LAFCo is a Responsible Agency under CEQA and would use this IS/MND in its decision-making process.

The State has enacted legislation that seeks to address the adverse environmental impacts of projects that disproportionately affect minority and/or lower income communities, particularly those already burdened with environmental problems. The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has developed the California Communities Environmental Health Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen) to identify “environmental justice” or “disadvantaged” communities. CalEnviroScreen measures pollution and population characteristics using 20 indicators such as air and drinking water quality, waste sites, toxic emissions, asthma rates, and poverty. It applies a formula to each U.S. Census tract in California to generate a score that rates the level of cumulative impacts on each area. A census tract that scores in the top 25% is considered a disadvantaged community. The project site is within Census Tract 6077003208. According to CalEnviroScreen, the overall score for this census tract is not within the top 25%; therefore, the project site is not within a disadvantaged community (OEHHA 2021).

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Division of Established Community.

The project proposes a commercial development on vacant land on a site designated for commercial development. Although the project site is adjacent to a residential area, it is also adjacent to existing commercial development. No other residential areas have been designated in the vicinity. The project would not divide an established community and therefore would have no adverse impact on this issue.

The project would provide personal storage facilities in relative proximity to extensive areas of residential development between Lower Sacramento Road and Interstate 5, south of Eight Mile Road. There are no other existing personal storage facilities in the area north of Mosher Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1349
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-34 November 2021
Slough. The availability of new personal storage facilities may be viewed as a contribution to the existing community
b) Conflicts with Land Use Plans, Policies, and Regulations.

The project proposes to annex the project site to the City of Stockton. As noted, the project site is currently designated by the County General Plan as Agricultural-Urban Reserve, which applies to areas that are in the logical path of development around an urban community. The project site is within a developing urban area of Stockton; as such, the existing Agricultural-Urban Reserve designation is appropriate to proposed project development. The project site is currently designated Commercial under the Stockton General Plan.

Upon annexation, the site would be pre-zoned to CG General Commercial, which is consistent with the existing Stockton General Plan designation, and the proposed project development would be consistent with both. The project would not involve any conflict with the Stockton General Plan or zoning.

Frontage improvements along Grider Way will require widening of the existing street section in order to comply with City improvement standards, which will involve dedication of rightof-way along the project site frontage on Grider Way and acquisition of right-of-way from the existing commercial properties that front on Grider Way, which will also be the responsibility of the applicant. The need for right-of-way dedication and acquisition will be determined by joint City/applicant design effort to minimize the improvement width. From preliminary discussions with City staff, widening will affect the existing parking area of these properties, but that the needed improvements can be accomplished without significant impact to on-site circulation patterns or loss of parking capacity.

This IS/MND discusses potential impacts on the environment and prescribes mitigation of potentially significant environmental impacts. No impacts have been identified that cannot be mitigated to a level that would be less than significant. Also, this IS/MND has identified existing land use plans, policies, and ordinances potentially applicable to the project. These plans, policies, and ordinances either do not apply to the project, or the project would comply with them, thereby eliminating potential conflict. The project also would not conflict with State legislation designed to minimize environmental impacts on disadvantaged communities.

The project site is adjacent to the City limits of Stockton. The site is also adjacent to City facilities such as water and sewer lines and would require no extension of utility lines to obtain service. As such, the proposed annexation of the project site would be consistent with LAFCo policies. Overall, project impacts related to land use plans, policies, and regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect would be less than significant.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1350
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-35 November 2021

3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
Mineral resources within San Joaquin County are primarily sand, gravel, and other construction material deposits in the alluvial portion of the valley floor. Sand and gravel deposits have been identified along the Stanislaus River in San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties from Ripon to the Stanislaus/Tuolumne County line (DMG 1977). Portland cement concrete aggregate deposits also have been identified within San Joaquin County; however, none are located on the project site (DMG 1988).

Oil and natural gas deposits have been identified throughout the Central Valley. Deposits in the Stockton area are predominantly natural gas. The project site is within the Harte natural gas field, which is now abandoned. The nearest active field is the Rindge Tract natural gas field, approximately four miles southwest of the project site (DOGGR 2021).

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a, b) Availability of Mineral Resources.

As described above, there are no identified mineral resources areas nor active mining operations on or near the project site. The project site is within a natural gas field that has been abandoned. Therefore, the project would not affect the availability of, or access to, any known or locally designated mineral resources. The project would have no impact on mineral resources.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1351
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-36 November 2021

3.13 NOISE
Would the project result in: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
Assessment of noise impacts focuses on project-related changes in the “ambient" noise level, which is the general noise level in a project area. The main source of noise in the project vicinity is train traffic on the adjoining track to the northeast and motor vehicle traffic on Lower Sacramento Road, with a lesser noise source being traffic on Grider Way. Lower Sacramento Road is classified as an arterial by the Stockton General Plan. The Stockton General Plan 2040 EIR indicates that traffic on the segment of Lower Sacramento Road between Eight Mile Road and Bear Creek – the segment on which the project site is adjacent – generates noise at a level of 68.9 decibels (dB) 50 feet from the road centerline. The 60-dB noise contour was estimated to extend 196 feet from centerline (City of Stockton 2018b). No noise data are available for Grider Way, a local street that does not have substantial traffic volumes. Noise data for the railroad track are also not available.

The main concern regarding noise impact is its impact on noise-sensitive land uses. Noisesensitive land uses are defined in Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.60.040 as residences, childcare and educational facilities, libraries and museums, lodging, and medical services.

As noted, the project site is near residential areas and Podesta Ranch Elementary School.

Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.60.040 establishes the City’s standards concerning acceptable noise levels for new or expanded commercial, industrial, and other land userelated noise sources. Land use-related projects that will create new noise sources or expand existing noise sources shall be required to mitigate their noise levels so that the resulting noise does not adversely impact noise-sensitive land uses; and does not exceed the standards specified in Table 3-4 below.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1352
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-37 November 2021
TABLE 3-4

CITY OF STOCKTON LAND USE-RELATED NOISE STANDARDS
Noise Level Descriptor
Outdoor Activity Areas
Day
(7:00 a.m – 10:00 p.m.)
Night
(10:00 a.m. – 7:00 a.m.)
Hourly equivalent sound level (dB Leq) 55 45
Maximum sound level (dB) 75 65
Source: Stockton Municipal Code Section 16.60.040.

Groundborne vibration is not a common environmental problem. It is typically associated with transportation facilities, although it is unusual for vibration from sources such as buses and trucks to be perceptible, even in locations close to major roads. Construction equipment is another potential source. Caltrans has prescribed a methodology for evaluating groundborne vibration impacts from construction related to potential damage to structures, based on transient sources (e.g., blasting, drop balls) or continuous/frequent intermittent sources such as impact and vibratory pile drivers, vibratory compaction equipment (Caltrans 2013). Measurements of groundborne vibrations are presented in peak particle velocity, with the unit of measure being inches per second. Table 3-5 presents thresholds for impacts related to groundborne vibration, based on the Caltrans methodology.

TABLE 3-5

GROUNDBORNE VIBRATION THRESHOLDS
Guidelines for:

Maximum Peak Particle Velocity (in/sec)
Transient Sources
Continuous/Frequent
Intermittent Sources
Structure and Condition
Older residential structures 0.5 0.3
New residential structures 1.0 0.5
Modern industrial/commercial buildings 2.0 0.5
Human Response
Barely perceptible 0.04 0.01
Distinctly perceptible 0.25 0.04
Strongly perceptible 0.9 0.1
Severe 2.0 0.4
Source: Caltrans 2013.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1353
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-38 November 2021
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Generation of Noise Exceeding Local Standards.

The main source of noise anticipated with project operations would be traffic entering and exiting the facility site. As discussed in Section 3.17, Transportation, the number of trips to and from the project site would be low – approximately 102 trips per day. As such, the project would not generate a substantial amount of noise from its operations.

Noise from construction activities is the primary noise of concern associated with the project.

Table 3-6 shows noise levels that could be generated by construction equipment.

Construction activities near residences, schools, and libraries could generate noise at levels that exceed City noise standards for these land uses. Mitigation described below would limit construction hours and require the use of mufflers, thereby reducing construction noise impacts to a level that would be less than significant.

Level of Significance: Potentially significant
Mitigation Measures:

NOISE-1: The following measures shall be implemented to minimize noise impacts at sensitive receptors (i.e., residences and schools) during construction:
• Construction activities shall be limited to the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on all working days. Construction work shall not occur on Sundays and federal holidays.
• Use newer equipment with improved muffling and ensure that all equipment items have the manufacturers’ recommended noise abatement measures, such as mufflers, engine enclosures, and engine vibration isolators intact and operational. All construction equipment shall be inspected at periodic intervals to ensure proper maintenance and presence of noise control devices (e.g., mufflers and shrouding, etc.). • Turn off idling equipment when not in use for more than five (5) minutes.

Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant
b) Exposure to Groundborne Vibrations.

The project may generate groundborne vibrations from construction equipment use. As noted, land uses sensitive to noise are located near the project site. These land uses would also be sensitive to groundborne vibrations. Groundborne vibrations from project construction would cease once work is completed; nevertheless, groundborne vibrations could significantly affect sensitive land uses.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1354
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-39 November 2021
TABLE 3-6

CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE
Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dB at 50 feet
Backhoe 78
Compactor 83
Compressor (air) 78
Concrete Saw 90
Dozer 82
Dump Truck 76
Excavator 81
Generator 81
Jackhammer 89
Pneumatic Tools 85
Source: FHWA 2006.

The largest construction equipment likely to be used would be a large bulldozer, which would generate vibrations at a peak particle velocity of 0.089 inches per second at 25 feet (City of Stockton 2018b). Based on Caltrans standards provided in Table 3-5 above, the vibrations generated would be less than thresholds for structural damage or human perception. After construction work is completed, no groundborne vibrations are expected to be generated.

Project impacts related to groundborne vibration would be less than significant. c) Public Airport and Private Airstrip Noise.

As noted in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the nearest public airport is Lodi Airpark, approximately 2.6 miles to the north. The project site is outside the noise contours delineated in the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan for the airport (Coffman Associates 2009). There are no private airstrips in the project vicinity. The project would not lead to the placement of residents or employees who could potentially be exposed to noise from any source. The project would have no impact related to airport or airstrip noise.

3.14 POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1355
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-40 November 2021
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The 2020 U.S. Census indicates that the population of Stockton is 312,682, an increase of approximately 7.2% from its 2010 U.S. Census population of 291,707. As of the 2020 U.S.

Census, Stockton had an estimated 104,720 housing units (U.S. Census Bureau 2020). Based on estimates from the California Department of Finance, single-family detached units (typical houses) accounted for approximately 64.5% of total housing units in Stockton (California Department of Finance 2021).

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Unplanned Population Growth.

The project proposes construction of a storage facility. It would not construct additional housing, nor would it indirectly encourage development that may lead to population growth beyond that anticipated in the Stockton General Plan. As noted, the project would be consistent with the Stockton General Plan designation of the project site, which is Commercial. The project vicinity is already substantially developed, and any future development would occur in accordance with the Stockton General Plan, which designated remaining vacant land in the area for other commercial development. The project would have no impact related to unplanned population growth.
b) Displacement of Housing or People.

The project site is vacant; it has no existing housing. No housing or residents would be displaced because of any work associated with the project. The project would have no impact related to displacement.

3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of, or the need for, new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
i) Fire protection?
ii) Police protection?
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1356
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-41 November 2021
iii) Schools?
iv) Parks?
v) Other public facilities?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
Currently, the project site is within the boundaries of the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District, which covers most of the unincorporated lands in the north Stockton area and contracts with the Stockton Fire Department for services. Police protection services are currently provided by the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department, which has its main station and the County Jail in the community of French Camp.

Upon annexation, fire protection services for the project would be provided by the Stockton Fire Department, and police protection services would be provided by the Stockton Police Department. The Stockton Fire Department provides fire protection, fire prevention, and paramedic emergency medical services to the City of Stockton. The closest Fire Department station to the project site is Station 14 at 3019 McNabb Street, approximately 1.7 miles west of the project site. Station 14 is equipped with one engine and a grass fire rig (City of Stockton 2020).

The Stockton Police Department’s Main Precinct, at 22 East Market Street approximately five miles northwest of the project site, is where field services are located. Central Services, located at 22 East Weber Street, houses investigations and support services. The service area of the Police Department, entirely within City limits, is organized into six Community Policing Districts. The project site is adjacent to the Bear Creek Community Policing District, which covers northwestern Stockton.

The project site is within the boundaries of the Stockton Unified School District. Podesta Ranch Elementary School, part of the Stockton Unified School District, is located less than one-quarter mile west of the project site. The Stockton-San Joaquin County Public Library system provides library services to the City and County. The nearest branch is the Margaret K. Troke Library at 502 West Benjamin Holt Drive, approximately 2.3 miles south of the project site.

The City of Stockton provides park and recreational services within its City limits, managed by its Community Services Department. The nearest City park to the project site is Dentoni Park, approximately one mile to the southwest. Section 3.16, Recreation, discusses nearby park facilities in more detail.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1357
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-42 November 2021
Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a-i) Fire Protection.

The project proposes the construction of a self-storage facility, which will result in an increment of additional demand for fire protection services above existing conditions.

However, as discussed above, the project site is already served by the Stockton Fire Department, which provides fire protection services under contract with the Lincoln Rural County Fire Protection District. Also, as noted in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, development of the project site would eliminate the fire hazard associated with existing site conditions.

The project would be required to comply with the provisions of the 2019 California Fire Code adopted by the City. The California Fire Code contain provisions designed to improve fire safety in structures, including installation of sprinkler systems, alarm systems, and portable fire extinguishers, along with requirements for hydrants and fire flows. In addition, the Stockton Fire Department has specific requirements, such as fire apparatus turning radii and hydrant spacing, that would be attached as conditions of approval to the project.

Given the above, it is expected that the project would not place additional demands such that the Stockton Fire Department would be required to construct new or expanded fire protection facilities that could have environmental impacts. The project would, however, be required to participate in the funding of new fire stations by paying Public Facility Fees to the City.

Public Facility Fees are intended to be used for future construction of Fire Department facilities required by urban expansion. Given all this, project impacts related to fire protection services would be less than significant.
a-ii) Police Protection.

Development of the project would result in an increment of additional demand for police protection services above existing conditions. The Stockton Police Department currently patrols nearby developed areas that are within the City limits; such patrols can be readily extended to the project site.

The Police Department has indicated there will eventually be a need for new police facilities as growth continues in the City, particularly in northern Stockton (City of Stockton 2020).

The project itself would not trigger the need for new police facilities, but construction of such facilities when required in the future would have potential for environmental impacts.

The Stockton General Plan 2040 EIR analyzed the potential environmental impacts of new police and other capital facilities. It stated that the estimated timing or location of such facilities, if required, or the exact nature of these facilities are not known, so project-specific environmental impacts that would occur from their construction and operation cannot be determined at this time. However, such facilities would require permitting and review in accordance with CEQA, which would ensure that any environmental impacts are disclosed and mitigated to the extent possible (City of Stockton 2018b). The Stockton Municipal Service Review confirmed that new police facilities would likely be required in the future and that the City will review future projects on an individual basis and will require City compliance with requirements (e.g., impact fees) in effect (City of Stockton 2020).

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1358
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-43 November 2021
The project would be required to pay Public Facility Fees to the City that would be applied to future construction or renovation of Police Department facilities required by urban expansion. Future facilities would be subject to CEQA review. With payment of these Public Facility Fees, impacts on police protection services would be less than significant. a-iii) Schools.

As noted in Section 3.14, Population and Housing, the project would not construct residences that would encourage population growth in the area. Because of this, the project would not create additional demand for school services. No new or expanded school facilities that could have environmental impacts would be required. The project would have no impact on this issue.
a-iv) Parks.

The project would not create additional demand for parks. No new or expanded facilities that could have environmental impacts would be required. The project would have no impact on this issue.
a-v) Other Public Facilities.

The project would not create additional demand for other public facilities, such as libraries.

No new or expanded facilities that could have environmental impacts would be required. The project would have no impact on this issue.

3.16 RECREATION
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur or be accelerated?
b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
As noted in Section 3.15, Public Services, the City of Stockton provides park and recreational services within its City limits, managed by its Community Services Department. The City owns and operates 66 parks, along with accessible open space, special purpose facilities, and trails. As mentioned in Section 3.15, Public Services, the nearest City park is Dentoni Park, Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1359
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-44 November 2021
approximately one mile southwest of the project site. Dentoni Park, a 9.5-acre neighborhood park, is equipped with picnic tables, a barbeque facility, a tot lot, horseshoe pits, two tennis courts, a softball field, and a basketball court.

Parks and recreational facilities in the unincorporated areas are managed by San Joaquin County Parks and Recreation. Oak Grove Park, located at 4520 West Eight Mile Road, is a regional park approximately 2.5 miles northwest of the project site. Oak Grove Park contains 10-acre Oak Grove Lake, which is stocked with catfish and trout for fishing; paddle boats and aqua cycles are available for rent. It also has a nature center, two nature trails, and a youth campground. Other nearby recreational facilities include the Elkhorn County Club, a private golf course approximately 0.4 miles north of the project site.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a, b) Recreational Facilities.

As noted in Section 3.14, Population and Housing, the project would not construct residences that would encourage or accommodate new population growth in the area. Because of this, it would not create additional demand for recreational facilities, nor would it increase the use of existing facilities. No new or expanded facilities that could have environmental impacts would be required. The project would have no impact on this issue.

3.17 TRANSPORTATION
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance, or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
b) Conflict with or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards to a geometric design feature (e g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e g, farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site is bounded by two roadways. Lower Sacramento Road, east of the project site, is a regional arterial road that connects Stockton with the communities of Lodi and Woodbridge to the north. It is a two-lane roadway near the project site. At the intersection Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1360
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-45 November 2021
with Grider Way, Lower Sacramento Road has left-turn pockets in both directions and a right-turn pocket and acceleration lane in the southbound direction. Arterials are highvolume roadways that connect the regional roadway network to the local roadway network.

The segment of Lower Sacramento Road adjacent to the project site passes beneath the nearby Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Because of this, no direct access to the project site is available from Lower Sacramento Road.

Grider Way is a narrow, two-lane local street that forms most of the southern boundary of the project site. Access to and from the project site would be from this road. Grider Way connects Lower Sacramento Road traffic to the residential areas and Podesta Ranch Elementary School north and west of the project site via Whistler Way, and to other commercial buildings in the project vicinity. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk improvements have been installed along the frontage of the commercial buildings south of Grider Way; no frontage improvements have been installed along the north side of Grider Way or elsewhere along this road. West of the project site, Grider Way connects with and continues west as Whistler Way. As noted in Chapter 2.0, Project Description, it is proposed that Grider Way would be renamed Whistler Way as part of the project.

The San Joaquin Regional Transit District (SJRTD) is the primary provider of public transportation service in the Stockton metropolitan area, offering fixed-route and flexible fixed-route services in the Stockton metropolitan area. In addition, SJRTD provides curb-tocurb paratransit (“dial-a-ride”) bus service for passengers who, due to their disability or age, are unable to access fixed route services. No SJRTD bus routes currently serve the project site. There are currently no designated bikeways in the vicinity. As noted, sidewalk has been installed along the frontage of the commercial buildings south of Grider Way. Sidewalks also have been installed along both sides of Lower Sacramento Road near the project site.

The State of California has recently added Section 15064.3 to the CEQA Guidelines, which is meant to incorporate SB 743 into CEQA analysis. SB 743 was enacted in 2013 with the intent to balance congestion management needs and the mitigation of the environmental impacts of traffic with statewide GHG emission reduction goals. SB 743 requires an alternative mechanism for evaluating transportation impacts and amending the CEQA guidelines to provide a transportation impact analysis framework that prioritizes reducing GHG emissions, replacing the prior focus of minimizing automobile delay. Section 15064.3(b) states that VMT is the preferred method for evaluating transportation impacts, rather than LOS. The VMT metric measures the total miles traveled by vehicles associated with a project. Unlike LOS, VMT accounts for the total environmental impacts of a project on transportation, including use of non-vehicle travel modes. As noted in Section 3.6, Energy, estimated countywide daily VMT was 17,868,785 miles in 2015.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Conflicts with Transportation Programs and Plans.

The CalEEMod run for the project (see Section 3.3, Air Quality) based its estimates on the vehicle trips that would be generated by the proposed development. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition), a “mini-warehouse” would generate 17.96 vehicle trips per 100 storage units. The total vehicle trips generated by Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1361
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-46 November 2021
the proposed development were first estimated by using this rate, then translated into trips per 1,000 square feet for use in CalEEMod. The total vehicle trips that would be generated would be approximately 102. This is considered a conservative estimate, as that assumes approximately 20% of all units would be visited every day, which is considered unlikely.

The estimated 102 trips would make only a small contribution to traffic in the vicinity and would not substantially affect traffic flow. As noted in Section 3.3, Air Quality, for comparison, the segment of Lower Sacramento Road adjacent to the project had average daily traffic of 16,340 as of 2017. As such, the project is not expected to conflict with the Circulation Element policies of the Stockton General Plan that address traffic flow. In particular, Action TR-4.1A states that the City shall strive for LOS D or better for both daily roadway segment and peak hour intersection operations. Given the minimal traffic the project would generate, the project is not expected to affect LOS on nearby roads. Project impacts regarding conflicts with transportation programs and plans would be less than significant. b) Conflict with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b).

Section 15064.3(b) states that VMT is the preferred method for evaluating transportation impacts, rather than the commonly used LOS. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) has issued a Technical Advisory on the application of VMT in evaluating project impacts. The OPR Technical Advisory established screening criteria to assist in determining if a land use project would have a VMT impact requiring further evaluation.

One of these criteria is if the project generates or attracts fewer than 110 trips per day, then it generally may be assumed to cause a less-than-significant transportation impact (OPR 2018). As noted, the proposed project is expected to generate 102 average daily trips; therefore, the project would meet this screening criteria. The project would not conflict with the intent of CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). The project would have no impact on this issue.

The City’s TIA Guidelines indicate that a project screened out for VMT analysis “may be required to evaluate potential transit, bicycle/scooter, pedestrian, safety and construction impacts. The project’s potential construction safety effects are addressed in the following section. Sidewalks and a bicycle lane will be included in the street frontage improvements linking existing facilities along Lower Sacramento Road to existing bike facilities within Windmill Park. Being an auto-accessed personal storage facility, the project is not expected to generate any substantial transit need.
c) Traffic Hazards.

Project construction would involve movement of construction equipment onto and from the site, which would be different in character from existing traffic in the vicinity. Construction traffic would be linked to major improvements when they occur, which would be intermittently, temporary, and would cease when work is completed. No significant amount of construction traffic is anticipated. The project does not propose any substantial alterations to Grider Way, other than frontage improvements, and would therefore not contribute to potential traffic hazards. The project would have no impact related to traffic safety.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1362
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-47 November 2021
d) Emergency Access.

The site plan indicates that the project site would be accessible from two points off Grider Way – the main entrance and an emergency vehicle access gate from 681 Grider Way. These points would provide adequate access for emergency vehicles. The project would have no impact on emergency access.

3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its
discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the
criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site is generally considered to be in Northern Valley Yokuts territory. Their territory included most of the northern San Joaquin Valley and stopped between the Mokelumne and Calaveras rivers. At the core of their land ran the San Joaquin River. The Northern Valley Yokuts tribe had a village, Yatchcumne (or Yachik) near Stockton. Another village, Tauquimne, in the eastern end of the San Joaquin-Sacramento Delta near Bear Creek, appears in mission records. Early impacts of disease and missionization destroyed much of the Northern Valley Yokuts culture before it could be documented, resulting in a dearth of information about the tribe (City of Stockton 2018b).

In 2014, the California Legislature enacted AB 52. AB 52 modifies CEQA procedures regarding consultation with Native American tribes on cultural resource issues. AB 52 established a category called “tribal cultural resources,” which not only includes physical resources but also site features, places, cultural landscapes, and sacred places and objects of value to a tribe, and which are on or eligible for a State or local historic register. AB 52 Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1363
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-48 November 2021
establishes notification requirements and consultation procedures between a CEQA lead agency and a tribe when a tribal cultural resource is involved.

In conjunction with the Site Approval application that was approved prior to submittal of the current application to the City, San Joaquin County contacted several local tribes that may have had an interest in the project and its potential impacts on tribal cultural resources, in accordance with AB 52. A response was received from the United Auburn Indian Community (UAIC). The UAIC noted the possibility of human remains of Native American origin occurring on the project site. No responses were received from other contacted tribes during the County’s AB 52 effort.

The project applicant distributed notice of the proposed project on behalf of the City to a more extensive list of tribal entities. The notification material and distribution list are shown in Appendix C of this document. No replies to this notification effort have been received as of the date of publication of this IS/MND.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a, b) Tribal Cultural Resources.

As noted, during the County’s AB 52 notification effort, the UAIC noted the possibility of human remains of Native American origin occurring on the project site. Should such remains be encountered during project construction, their disturbance would be a potentially significant impact.

The UAIC recommended procedures to be followed should any human remains be uncovered during the course of project construction. These procedures are described in the mitigation measures below, which also include worker training in tribal cultural resources and their treatment. The UAIC considers that implementation of these mitigation measures would adequately address impacts on tribal cultural resources encountered during construction.

Therefore, project impacts on tribal cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation.

The City of Stockton through the project applicant, as described above, has taken additional steps to notify potentially interested tribes of the proposed project. City contact with the tribes may generate additional concerns and recommendations regarding mitigation that should be included in the project. However, at this point in time, the AB 52 process has identified the potential for the project to result in significant effects on tribal cultural resources and the means by which those impacts can be reduced to a less than significant level. In the event that other tribes differ as to how tribal cultural resources should be protected, those differences will need to be addressed, and mitigation requirements modified, during further tribal consultation if requested of the City.

Level of Significance: Potentially significant
Mitigation Measures (as identified by United Auburn Indian Community):

TCR-1: A minimum of seven days prior to the start of any ground-disturbing activity, the contractor shall notify the City’s Community Development Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1364
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-49 November 2021
Department of the start date and invite a UAIC tribal representative or tribal monitor to inspect the project site within the first five days of ground disturbance activity. During this inspection, the UAIC tribal representative or tribal monitor shall provide an onsite meeting for construction personnel information on tribal cultural resources and a workers awareness brochure. The meeting shall include relevant information on sensitive tribal cultural resources, applicable regulations and protocols for avoidance, and consequences of violating State laws and regulations. It shall describe appropriate avoidance and minimization measures for resources and shall outline what to do and whom to contact if any potential tribal cultural resources are encountered. The meeting shall underscore the requirement for confidentiality and culturally appropriate treatment of any find with cultural significance to Native American tribal values.

TCR-2: If any potential tribal cultural resources are encountered during project construction activities, all work within 100 feet of the encounter shall be suspended, and the UAIC, the City, and the onsite project manager shall be immediately notified. If human remains are encountered, the County Coroner shall also be notified in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5(c). The tribal monitor and/or a qualified archaeologist shall examine the find and determine the disposition of the resource. Preservation in place is the preferred alternative, although other options may be pursued in coordination with the tribal monitor. The location and nature of the encountered resource shall be strictly confidential, and under no circumstances shall the contractor or any employee collect the encountered material.

Significance After Mitigation: Less than significant

3.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry, and multiple dry years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that would serve the project that it has adequate Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1365
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-50 November 2021
capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
The project site currently is not provided with utility services. Upon annexation and development of the project site, the City of Stockton would provide potable water and wastewater services to the project site. Existing water and sewer lines are located beneath Grider Way. The City also has a storm drainage system that collects runoff from the area.

Solid waste collection service for the project site would be provided by Waste Management.

Energy services, including electricity and natural gas, would be provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Telephone service is provided by AT&T, while cellular telephone service is provided by several companies.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Relocation or Construction of Utility Facilities.

Project construction would not require the replacement or relocation of utility lines. New water and sewer lines would be installed parallel to existing lines beneath Grider Way. The installation of these lines would occur within existing rights-of-way and would have no different environmental impacts from project site development. The project would require no major extension of electrical or communication lines to the project site such that significant environmental impacts would occur. Project impacts related to relocation or construction of utility facilities would be less than significant. b) Water Supplies.

The project would place only limited demands on the water supplies of the City; water use would be confined mainly to the office area and landscaping. No new supplies would need to be obtained to satisfy project demands. The project would have no impact on water supplies.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1366
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-51 November 2021
c) Wastewater Treatment Capacity.

The project would generate only limited wastewater, mainly from the office/onsite residence.

The project would not require expansion of capacity of the City’s wastewater treatment plant to accommodate the wastewater generated by the project. The project would have no impact on wastewater treatment capacity.
d, e) Solid Waste Services.

The project would limited generate solid waste; therefore, it would not place a significant demand on solid waste collection services. The project would not place demands on the capacity of landfills where the City’s solid waste is disposed. The project would have no impact on solid waste services or regulations pertaining to solid waste.

3.20 WILDFIRE
If located in or near State Responsibility Areas or lands classified as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
Environmental Setting
Wildland fires are an annual hazard in San Joaquin County. Wildland fires burn natural vegetation on undeveloped lands and include rangeland, brush, and grass fires. Long, hot, and dry summers with temperatures often exceeding 100°F add to the County’s fire hazard.

Human activities are the major causes of wildland fires, while lightning causes the remaining wildland fires. High hazard areas for wildland fires are the grass-covered areas in the east and the southwest foothills of the County (San Joaquin County 2016).

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1367
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-52 November 2021
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) has a Fire and Resource Assessment Program that identifies fire threat based on a combination of two factors: 1) fire frequency, or the likelihood of a given area burning, and 2) potential fire behavior (hazard).

These two factors are combined in determining the following Fire Hazard Severity Zones:

Moderate, High, Very High, Extreme. These zones apply to areas designated as State Responsibility Areas – areas in which the State has primary firefighting responsibility. The project site is not within a State Responsibility Area; rather, it is within a Local Responsibility Area, where local fire districts or departments have primary firefighting responsibility. The project site and vicinity are not in any designated fire hazard zone for a Local Responsibility Area (Cal Fire 2007a, 2007b).

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures
a) Emergency Response Plans and Emergency Evacuation Plans.

The project site is not part of a State Responsibility Area, and Cal Fire maps indicate the site is not designated within any Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The project is within a mostly developed urban area with no significant open spaces. As discussed in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, work within Grider Way has the potential to restrict traffic flow.

Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would minimize impact related to emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans to a level that would be less than significant. b) Exposure of Project Occupants to Wildfire Hazards.

As noted, Cal Fire maps indicate that the project site is not designated within a Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The project is a self-storage facility; only one onsite manager would occupy the facility. As discussed in Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the potential fire hazard on the project site would be substantially reduced with site development. The project would have no impact related to exposure of project occupants to wildfire hazards. c) Installation and Maintenance of Infrastructure.

As noted in Section 3.19, Utilities and Service System, existing utility lines are available in the project vicinity. Only lines connecting the project site to these utility lines would be required. The installation of these improvements would not exacerbate the wildfire risk on the project site, which is considered minimal. The project would have no impact related to infrastructural exacerbation of wildfire hazards.
d) Risks from Runoff, Post-Fire Slope Instability, or Drainage Changes.

The project site is in a topographically flat area at the bottom of the San Joaquin Valley.

There are no streams or other channels that cross the site. As such, it is not expected that people or structures would be exposed to significant risks from changes resulting from fires in steeper areas, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides. The project would have no impact related to risks from runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1368
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-53 November 2021

3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community,
substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable? "Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
NARRATIVE DISCUSSION
a) Findings on Biological and Cultural Resources.

The biological resource impacts of the revised project were described in Section 3.4, Biological Resources. Cultural resource impacts were described in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, and Section 3.18, Tribal Cultural Resources. No potentially significant effects on biological resources were identified with implementation of Incidental Take Minimization Measures from SJCOG. Potentially significant environmental effects on cultural and tribal cultural resources were identified, but implementation of mitigation measures described in these sections would reduce these effects to a level that would be less than significant. b) Findings on Cumulatively Considerable Impacts.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(a)(1) states that a “cumulative impact” is created by the combination of a proposed project with other past, present, and probable future projects (or programs) causing related impacts. The overall impacts of urban development in the project area generally are addressed in the certified EIR for the Stockton General Plan 2040.

Cumulative impacts can also result from individually minor, but collectively significant, projects taking place over time (CEQA Guidelines Section 15355[b]). For this project, past projects applicable to potential cumulative effects include Podesta Ranch Elementary Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1369
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 3-54 November 2021
School, commercial development near the intersection of Lower Sacramento Road and Grider Way, and residential development north and west of the project site.

In general, the project would have no impact on environmental issues, or would have impacts that are less than significant with mitigation. The potential environmental effects of the project would contribute to environmental effects associated with commercial development of the site, and urban development of other surrounding lands as addressed in the certified EIR for the Stockton General Plan 2040. None of the project impacts identified are expected to have a notable cumulative effect or a cumulatively considerable effect in combination with existing or planned development in the project area. The project is consistent with planned development in the area as provided in the Stockton General Plan. The project would not make a considerable contribution to potential cumulative impacts. c) Findings on Adverse Effects on Human Beings.

Potential adverse project effects on human beings were discussed in Section 3.3, Air Quality; Section 3.7, Geology and Soils (seismic hazards); Section 3.9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Section 3.10, Hydrology and Water Quality (flooding); Section 3.17, Transportation (traffic hazards); and Section 3.20, Wildfire. Potential adverse effects identified in those sections would be reduced to levels considered less than significant through compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and City ordinances and standards, along with mitigation measures where necessary.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1370
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 4-1 November 2021

4.0 REFERENCES

4.1 DOCUMENT PREPARERS
This IS/MND was prepared by BaseCamp Environmental, Inc. for use by and under the supervision of the City of Stockton. The following persons were involved in preparation of the IS/MND:

BaseCamp Environmental, Inc.

Charlie Simpson, Principal
Terry Farmer, AICP, Senior Environmental Planner
Krista Simpson, Associate Environmental Planner

4.2 REFERENCES CITED
Bryant, William A. and Earl W. Hart. 2007. Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California:

Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones Maps. Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey Special Publication 42. Interim Revision 2007.

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2009. Model Policies for Greenhouse Gases in General Plans: A Resource for Local Government to Incorporate General Plan Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions. June 2009.

California Air Resources Board (ARB). 2017. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. November 2017.
______. 2020. California Greenhouse Gas Emissions for 2000 to 2018.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resources Protection, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). 2018. San Joaquin County Important Farmland 2018 (map).

California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology (DMG). 1977.

Mineral Land Classification Study of the Stanislaus River Area, San Joaquin and Stanislaus Counties, California. DMG Open File Report 77-16. ______. 1988. Mineral Land Classification of Portland Cement Concrete Aggregate in the Stockton-Lodi Production-Consumption Region. Special Report 160.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR). 2021. Well Finder – CalGEM GIS. Available online at Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1371
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 4-2 November 2021
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/#openModal/- 121.32396/38.04370/12. Accessed September 1, 2021.

California Department of Finance. 2021. Report E-5, Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, January 1, 2011-2021, with 2010 Benchmark.

Released May 1, 2021.

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire). 2007a. Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA, San Joaquin County (map). October 2, 2007. ______. 2007b. Draft Fire Hazard Severity Zones in SRA, San Joaquin County (map).

Adopted on November 7, 2007.

California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2021a. EnviroStor database, www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov. Accessed August 26, 2021.
______. 2021b. Podesta Ranch Elementary School (60000071). From EnviroStor database, www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov. Accessed August 26, 2021.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2013. Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. September 2013. ______. 2017. Designated and Eligible California Scenic Highways. Available online at www.dot.ca.gov/design/lap/livability/scenic-highways/index.html. March 2017.

California Department of Water Resources (DWR). 2014. Geology of the Northern Sacramento Valley. June 2014, updated September 22, 2014.

California Energy Commission (CEC). 2021a. Electricity Consumption by County – San Joaquin County 2019. Available online at ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty. aspx. Accessed August 20, 2021.
______. 2021b. Gas Consumption by County – San Joaquin County 2019. Available online at ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx. Accessed August 20, 2021.

California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA). 2021a. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit. Available online at http://www.calepa.ca.gov/ SiteCleanup/CorteseList/CurrentList.pdf. Accessed January 14, 2021. ______. 2021b. List of "Active" CDO and CAO from Water Board. Available online at http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/default.htm. Accessed January 14, 2021.

California Geological Survey (CGS). 2017. CGS Information Warehouse: Regulatory Maps. Available online at http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/ informationwarehouse/index.html?map=regulatorymaps. Accessed July 29, 2017.

California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2021.

CalEnviroScreen 3.0. Available online at oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/ Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1372
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 4-3 November 2021
calenviroscreen-30. Accessed September 1, 2021.

City of Stockton. 2004. Stockton Citywide Design Guidelines. Approved by City Council Resolution 04-0213, March 30, 2004.
______. 2009. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Municipal Stormwater Program Stormwater Management Plan. Prepared by Larry Walker Associates.

April 15, 2009.
______. 2014. City of Stockton Climate Action Plan. Prepared by ICF International.

Adopted December 2014.
______. 2018a. Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan. Adopted December 2018. ______. 2018b. Envision Stockton 2040 General Plan Update and Utility Master Plan Supplements Draft EIR. Prepared by PlaceWorks. June 2018. ______. 2020. City of Stockton Sphere of Influence Plan/Municipal Service Review.

Submitted by City of Stockton and PlaceWorks. April 23, 2020.

Coffman Associates, Inc. 2009. Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update, San Joaquin County Aviation System, San Joaquin County, California. July 2009.

Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Authority (ESJGA). 2019. Eastern San Joaquin Groundwater Subbasin Groundwater Sustainability Plan. November 2019.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2009. Flood Insurance Rate Map #06077C0315F, San Joaquin County, California. Effective date October 16, 2009.

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2006. Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide. FHWA-HEP-05-054. January 2006.

Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR). 2018. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. December 2018.

San Joaquin Council of Governments. (SJCOG). 2000. San Joaquin County MultiSpecies Open Space and Habitat Conservation Plan (SJMSCP). November 14, 2000.
______. 2018. 2018 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report. March 2018. ______. 2020. Bateman Self-Storage FacilitySJMSCP Incidental Take Minimization Measures. Letter dated December 21, 2020.

San Joaquin County. 2016. San Joaquin County General Plan Background Report.

Prepared by Mintier Harnish. December 2016.

San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. 2018. Groundwater Report, Spring 2018.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1373
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 4-4 November 2021
San Joaquin Local Agency Formation Commission (San Joaquin LAFCo). 2012. Change of Organization Policies and Procedures (Including Annexations and Reorganizations). Adopted September 21, 2007; last amended December 14, 2012.

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD). 2015. Guide for Assessing and Mitigating Air Quality Impacts. Adopted March 19, 2015. ______. 2020. Ambient Air Quality Standards and Valley Attainment Status. Available online at http://www.valleyair.org/aqinfo/attainment.htm. Accessed August 7, 2020.

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2021. GeoTracker website, www.geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov. Accessed August 26, 2021.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2020. Stockton city, California. Available online at https://data.census.gov/cedsci/profile?g=1600000US0675000. Accessed August 27, 2021.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2021.

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Joaquin County, California – Whistler Way Annexation. August 26, 2021.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1992. Soil Survey of San Joaquin County, California.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2009. Endangerment and Cause of Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. Federal Register Vol. 74, No. 239, pp. 66496-66546. December 15, 2009.

Wagner, D. L., C.W. Jennings, T.L. Bedrosian, and E. J. Bortugno. 1981. Geologic Map of the Sacramento Quadrangle, California, 1:250,000. California Division of Mines and Geology, Regional Geologic Map Series.

Westerling, Leroy, Josue Medellin-Azuara, Joshua Viers. 2018. San Joaquin Valley Summary Report. California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. Publication number: SUM-CCCA4-2018-003.

4.3 PERSONS CONSULTED
Diaz, Matt. City of Stockton Community Development Department.

Okubo, Ann. City of Stockton Municipal Utility Department.

Stagnaro, David J. Strategic Land Planning.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1374
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 5-1 November 2021

5.0 NOTES RELATED TO EVALUATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts.
3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less-than-significant level. Mitigation measures from “Earlier Analyses,” as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced.
5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration [CEQA Guidelines Section 15063(c)(3)(D)]. In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used: Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed: Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures: For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures, which ones were incorporated or refined from the earlier document, and the extent to which Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1375
Whistler Way Annexation IS/MND 5-2 November 2021
they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances).

Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance.

Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1376
APPENDIX A
CALEEMOD RESULTS
Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1377
Whistler Way Annexation
San Joaquin County, Annual
Project Characteristics -
Land Use -
Construction Phase - No demolition.

Vehicle Trips - From ITE Trip Generation Manual 10th edition - Mini-Warehouse.

Area Coating - Per SJVAPCD Rule 4601.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Default values.

Water Mitigation - Default values.

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 100.85 1000sqft 2.32 100,850.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
2 Wind Speed (m/s) 2.7 Precipitation Freq (Days) 51

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Operational Year 2023
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
203.98 CH4 Intensity 0.033
(lb/MWhr)
N2O Intensity 0.004
(lb/MWhr)
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 0 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 0 50
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Parking 0 150
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1378

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Exterior 0 150
tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Residential_Interior 0 150
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 0 50500
tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 0 151500
tblAreaCoating ReapplicationRatePercent 0 10
tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM10PercentReducti on
0 55
tblConstDustMitigation WaterExposedAreaPM25PercentReducti on
0 55
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 220.00 180.00
tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.74 1.01
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.74 1.01
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.74 1.01
tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowBathroomFaucet 0 32 tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowKitchenFaucet 0 18 tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowShower 0 20
tblWaterMitigation PercentReductionInFlowToilet 0 20
tblWaterMitigation UseWaterEfficientIrrigationSystemPercen tReduction
0 6.1
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1379

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1748 1.3722 1.3433 2.7200e0030.0427 0.0624 0.1051 0.0107 0.0597 0.0704 0.0000 232.1028 232.1028 0.0370 4.9700e003234.5096 2023 0.2522 0.1477 0.1729 3.2000e0043.8800e0036.6900e0030.0106 1.0500e0036.3400e0037.3900e0030.0000 27.6614 27.6614 5.3300e0034.2000e00427.9188 Maximum 0.2522 1.3722 1.3433 2.7200e0030.0427 0.0624 0.1051 0.0107 0.0597 0.0704 0.0000 232.1028 232.1028 0.0370 4.9700e003234.5096 Unmitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2022 0.1748 1.3722 1.3433 2.7200e0030.0398 0.0624 0.1022 0.0104 0.0597 0.0701 0.0000 232.1026 232.1026 0.0370 4.9700e003234.5094 2023 0.2522 0.1477 0.1729 3.2000e0043.8800e0036.6900e0030.0106 1.0500e0036.3400e0037.3900e0030.0000 27.6614 27.6614 5.3300e0034.2000e00427.9188 Maximum 0.2522 1.3722 1.3433 2.7200e0030.0398 0.0624 0.1022 0.0104 0.0597 0.0701 0.0000 232.1026 232.1026 0.0370 4.9700e003234.5094 Mitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1380
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.26 0.00 2.52 2.71 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 5-1-2022 7-31-2022 0.5811 0.5811
2 8-1-2022 10-31-2022 0.5799 0.5799
3 11-1-2022 1-31-2023 0.5374 0.5374
4 2-1-2023 4-30-2023 0.2447 0.2447
Highest 0.5811 0.5811

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.4174 1.0000e0059.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8000e0031.8000e0030.0000 0.0000 1.9200e003 Energy 3.2900e0030.0299 0.0251 1.8000e0042.2700e0032.2700e0032.2700e0032.2700e0030.0000 75.0157 75.0157 7.4900e0031.4300e00375.6290 Mobile 0.0512 0.0823 0.4916 1.1300e0030.1109 9.3000e0040.1118 0.0297 8.8000e0040.0305 0.0000 104.6778 104.6778 5.8200e0035.5300e003106.4705 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.2435 0.0000 19.2435 1.1373 0.0000 47.6751 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.3989 11.6759 19.0747 0.7618 0.0182 43.5357 Total 0.4718 0.1122 0.5176 1.3100e0030.1109 3.2000e0030.1141 0.0297 3.1500e0030.0328 26.6424 191.3711 218.0135 1.9124 0.0251 273.3122 Unmitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1381

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 0.4174 1.0000e0059.3000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.8000e0031.8000e0030.0000 0.0000 1.9200e003 Energy 3.2900e0030.0299 0.0251 1.8000e0042.2700e0032.2700e0032.2700e0032.2700e0030.0000 75.0157 75.0157 7.4900e0031.4300e00375.6290 Mobile 0.0501 0.0790 0.4725 1.0800e0030.1053 8.9000e0040.1062 0.0282 8.3000e0040.0290 0.0000 99.5927 99.5927 5.6400e0035.3100e003101.3158 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.8109 0.0000 4.8109 0.2843 0.0000 11.9188 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.9191 9.3407 15.2598 0.6095 0.0145 34.8286 Total 0.4707 0.1090 0.4985 1.2600e0030.1053 3.1600e0030.1085 0.0282 3.1000e0030.0313 10.7300 183.9509 194.6808 0.9069 0.0213 223.6940 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2022 4/29/2022 5 0
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/1/2022 5/4/2022 5 3 3 Grading Grading 5/5/2022 5/12/2022 5 6
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.24 2.91 3.69 3.82 5.00 1.25 4.89 4.99 1.59 4.66 59.73 3.88 10.70 52.58 15.32 18.15 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1382
4 Building Construction Building Construction 5/13/2022 1/19/2023 5 180 5 Paving Paving 1/20/2023 2/2/2023 5 10
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 2/3/2023 2/9/2023 5 5 OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56
Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Scrapers 1 8.00 367 0.48
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37
Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 151,500; Non-Residential Outdoor: 50,500; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating – sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1383

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 42.00 17.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 8.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1384

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1385

3.2 Demolition - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 3.7100e0030.0000 3.7100e0034.0000e0040.0000 4.0000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.2000e0048.2000e0040.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Total 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0053.7100e0038.9000e0044.6000e0034.0000e0048.2000e0041.2200e0030.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1386

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0776 0.0776 0.0000 0.0000 0.0784 Total 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0776 0.0776 0.0000 0.0000 0.0784 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.6700e0030.0000 1.6700e0031.8000e0040.0000 1.8000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0058.9000e0048.9000e0048.2000e0048.2000e0040.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Total 2.0700e0030.0235 0.0151 4.0000e0051.6700e0038.9000e0042.5600e0031.8000e0048.2000e0041.0000e0030.0000 3.2321 3.2321 1.0500e0030.0000 3.2582 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1387

3.3 Site Preparation - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0776 0.0776 0.0000 0.0000 0.0784 Total 4.0000e0053.0000e0053.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0040.0000 1.0000e0043.0000e0050.0000 3.0000e0050.0000 0.0776 0.0776 0.0000 0.0000 0.0784 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 1.5900e0030.0000 1.5900e0031.7000e0040.0000 1.7000e0040.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0052.2300e0032.2300e0032.0500e0032.0500e0030.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Total 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0051.5900e0032.2300e0033.8200e0031.7000e0042.0500e0032.2200e0030.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1388

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.0000e0057.0000e0057.5000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1940 0.1940 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1959 Total 9.0000e0057.0000e0057.5000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1940 0.1940 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1959 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 7.2000e0040.0000 7.2000e0048.0000e0050.0000 8.0000e0050.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0052.2300e0032.2300e0032.0500e0032.0500e0030.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Total 4.6200e0030.0510 0.0277 6.0000e0057.2000e0042.2300e0032.9500e0038.0000e0052.0500e0032.1300e0030.0000 5.4308 5.4308 1.7600e0030.0000 5.4747 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1389

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.0000e0057.0000e0057.5000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1940 0.1940 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1959 Total 9.0000e0057.0000e0057.5000e0040.0000 2.4000e0040.0000 2.4000e0046.0000e0050.0000 6.0000e0050.0000 0.1940 0.1940 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.1959 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1540 1.2121 1.1913 2.0800e0030.0583 0.0583 0.0559 0.0559 0.0000 172.3745 172.3745 0.0333 0.0000 173.2059 Total 0.1540 1.2121 1.1913 2.0800e0030.0583 0.0583 0.0559 0.0559 0.0000 172.3745 172.3745 0.0333 0.0000 173.2059 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1390

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.9700e0030.0778 0.0215 2.9000e0049.3200e0038.5000e0040.0102 2.6900e0038.2000e0043.5100e0030.0000 28.2473 28.2473 2.0000e0044.2800e00329.5280 Worker 0.0110 7.6800e0030.0867 2.5000e0040.0278 1.5000e0040.0279 7.3800e0031.3000e0047.5200e0030.0000 22.5465 22.5465 7.4000e0046.8000e00422.7685 Total 0.0140 0.0855 0.1082 5.4000e0040.0371 1.0000e0030.0381 0.0101 9.5000e0040.0110 0.0000 50.7938 50.7938 9.4000e0044.9600e00352.2965 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1540 1.2121 1.1913 2.0800e0030.0583 0.0583 0.0559 0.0559 0.0000 172.3743 172.3743 0.0333 0.0000 173.2057 Total 0.1540 1.2121 1.1913 2.0800e0030.0583 0.0583 0.0559 0.0559 0.0000 172.3743 172.3743 0.0333 0.0000 173.2057 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1391

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.9700e0030.0778 0.0215 2.9000e0049.3200e0038.5000e0040.0102 2.6900e0038.2000e0043.5100e0030.0000 28.2473 28.2473 2.0000e0044.2800e00329.5280 Worker 0.0110 7.6800e0030.0867 2.5000e0040.0278 1.5000e0040.0279 7.3800e0031.3000e0047.5200e0030.0000 22.5465 22.5465 7.4000e0046.8000e00422.7685 Total 0.0140 0.0855 0.1082 5.4000e0040.0371 1.0000e0030.0381 0.0101 9.5000e0040.0110 0.0000 50.7938 50.7938 9.4000e0044.9600e00352.2965 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0120 0.0954 0.0995 1.8000e0044.3000e0034.3000e0034.1200e0034.1200e0030.0000 14.5391 14.5391 2.7500e0030.0000 14.6079 Total 0.0120 0.0954 0.0995 1.8000e0044.3000e0034.3000e0034.1200e0034.1200e0030.0000 14.5391 14.5391 2.7500e0030.0000 14.6079 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1392

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3000e0045.2600e0031.5500e0032.0000e0057.9000e0043.0000e0058.2000e0042.3000e0043.0000e0052.6000e0040.0000 2.2928 2.2928 1.0000e0053.5000e0042.3963 Worker 8.5000e0045.6000e0046.6900e0032.0000e0052.3400e0031.0000e0052.3500e0036.2000e0041.0000e0056.3000e0040.0000 1.8402 1.8402 6.0000e0055.0000e0051.8573 Total 9.8000e0045.8200e0038.2400e0034.0000e0053.1300e0034.0000e0053.1700e0038.5000e0044.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 4.1329 4.1329 7.0000e0054.0000e0044.2537 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0120 0.0954 0.0995 1.8000e0044.3000e0034.3000e0034.1200e0034.1200e0030.0000 14.5391 14.5391 2.7500e0030.0000 14.6079 Total 0.0120 0.0954 0.0995 1.8000e0044.3000e0034.3000e0034.1200e0034.1200e0030.0000 14.5391 14.5391 2.7500e0030.0000 14.6079 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1393

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.3000e0045.2600e0031.5500e0032.0000e0057.9000e0043.0000e0058.2000e0042.3000e0043.0000e0052.6000e0040.0000 2.2928 2.2928 1.0000e0053.5000e0042.3963 Worker 8.5000e0045.6000e0046.6900e0032.0000e0052.3400e0031.0000e0052.3500e0036.2000e0041.0000e0056.3000e0040.0000 1.8402 1.8402 6.0000e0055.0000e0051.8573 Total 9.8000e0045.8200e0038.2400e0034.0000e0053.1300e0034.0000e0053.1700e0038.5000e0044.0000e0058.9000e0040.0000 4.1329 4.1329 7.0000e0054.0000e0044.2537 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8179 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1394

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2000e0041.4000e0041.7100e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4694 0.4694 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4738 Total 2.2000e0041.4000e0041.7100e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4694 0.4694 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4738 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 4.4000e0030.0431 0.0584 9.0000e0052.1700e0032.1700e0032.0000e0032.0000e0030.0000 7.7564 7.7564 2.4600e0030.0000 7.8178 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1395

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2000e0041.4000e0041.7100e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4694 0.4694 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4738 Total 2.2000e0041.4000e0041.7100e0031.0000e0056.0000e0040.0000 6.0000e0041.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 0.4694 0.4694 1.0000e0051.0000e0050.4738 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.2341 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.8000e0043.2600e0034.5300e0031.0000e0051.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6393 Total 0.2346 3.2600e0034.5300e0031.0000e0051.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6393 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1396

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e0054.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1252 0.1252 0.0000 0.0000 0.1264 Total 6.0000e0054.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1252 0.1252 0.0000 0.0000 0.1264 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 0.2341 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.8000e0043.2600e0034.5300e0031.0000e0051.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6393 Total 0.2346 3.2600e0034.5300e0031.0000e0051.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0041.8000e0040.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e0050.0000 0.6393 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 31 Date: 9/9/2021 1:24 PM Whistler Way Annexation - San Joaquin County, Annual
EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Not Applied Exhibit 1- Final IS/MND 1397

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e0054.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1252 0.1252 0.0000 0.0000 0.1264 Total 6.0000e0054.0000e0054.5000e0040.0000 1.6000e0040.0000 1.6000e0044.0000e0050.0000 4.0000e0050.0000 0.1252 0.1252 0.0000 0.0000 0.1264 Mitigated Construction Off-Site