Agenda — Temecula City Council, February 8, 2022 (part 4 of 5)

Public participation in the development, adoption and implementation of the housing element is essential to effective housing planning. Throughout the housing element process, the City should continue to engage the community, including organizations that represent lower -income and special needs households, by making information regularly available and considering and incorporating comments where appropriate.

For your information, some general plan element updates are triggered by housing element adoption. HCD reminds the City to consider timing provisions and welcomes the opportunity to provide assistance. For information, please see the Technical Advisories issued by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research at:
http://oi)r.ca.gov/docs/OPR Appendix C final.pdf and
http://opr.ca.gov/docs/Final 6.26.15.pdf.

Several federal, state, and regional funding programs consider housing element compliance as an eligibility or ranking criteria. For example, the CalTrans Senate Bill (SB) 1 Sustainable Communities grant; the Strategic Growth Council and HCD's Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities programs; and HCD's Permanent Local Housing Allocation consider housing element compliance and/or annual reporting requirements pursuant to Government Code section 65400. With a compliant housing element, the City will meet housing element requirements for these and other funding sources.

HCD appreciates the diligent work Amanda Tropiano and Brandon Rabidou during our review. We are committed to assisting the City of Temecula in addressing all statutory requirements of State Housing Element Law. If you have any questions or need additional technical assistance, please contact Tristan Lanza, of our staff, at tristan.lanza(aD_hcd.ca.gov.

Sincerely,
we(
Paul McDougall
Senior Program Manager
Enclosure

APPENDIX

CITY OF TEMECULA
The following changes are necessary to bring the City's housing element into compliance with Article 10.6 of the Government Code. Accompanying each recommended change, we cite the supporting section of the Government Code.

Housing element technical assistance information is available on HCD's website at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/housing-element/housing-element-memos.shtml .

Among other resources, the housing element section contains HCD's latest technical assistance tool, Building Blocks for Effective Housing Elements (Building Blocks), available at http://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/building-blocks/index.shtml and includes the Government Code addressing State Housing Element Law and other resources.

A. Review and Revision
Review the previous element to evaluate the appropriateness, effectiveness, and progress in implementation, and reflect the results of this review in the revised element. (Gov. Code, § 65588 (a) and (b).)
As part of the review of programs in the past cycle, the element must provide an evaluation of the effectiveness of goals, policies, and related actions in meeting the housing needs of special needs populations (e.g., elderly, persons with disabilities, large households, female headed households, farmworkers and persons experiencing homelessness).

B. Housing Needs, Resources, and Constraints

1. Affirmatively furtherfing] fair housing in accordance with Chapter 15 (commencing with Section 8899.50) of Division 1 of Title 2... shall include an assessment of fair housing in the jurisdiction. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(10)(A).) The element includes the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH) that was prepared in 2017 and is only pertinent until 2022. The analysis must be for the entire planning period and additional information is necessary to address the requisite affirmatively furthering fair housing (AFFH) analysis requirement, including local contributing factors to the fair housing issues and develop strong programs and strategies to address the identified fair housing issues as follows:

Enforcement and Outreach: The element describes past outreach efforts and fair housing services from the City's Analysis of Impediments (AI) completed in 2017.

While the element lists the partnership with the Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, it must also include recent information on fair housing enforcement as well as local knowledge. Enforcement should include data and evaluation (e.g., characteristics of complaints) of any past or current fair housing lawsuits, findings, settlements, judgements, and complaints as well as confirm that the City complies with fair housing law. The analysis could also evaluate data and the results from any fair housing Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 1 December 3, 2021

testing. In addition, the analysis should also include ongoing outreach throughout the planning period.

Integration and Segregation: While the element utilized data from the City's 2017 Al, the element must be updated to include recent data. The regional analysis of race should include an analysis of concentrations of race in comparison to the surrounding area, not just as a percentage of the overall population. In addition, the element must analyze whether families or non -family households are concentrated in certain areas or spread throughout the City and also include a regional level analysis (comparing the City to the region). The element must provide a local and regional analysis for race, disability, familial status, and income.

Racial/Ethnic Areas of Concentration of Poverty (R/ECAP): The element includes information relative to R/ECAP but the analysis must also provide a regional comparison. In addition, the City should also address concentrated areas of affluence.

The combination of the R/ECAP and areas of affluence analyses will help guide goals and actions to address fair housing issues. The analysis should evaluate the patterns and changes over time at a local and regional level. Furthermore, the element does list one area of high poverty and segregation therefore the City should analyze this concentration and consider relevant factors such as past policies, practices, and investments as well as whether or not there is a concentration of subsidized housing units in that area.

Access to Opportunity: While the element contains some general information on access to opportunity from its 2017 Al, it must be updated with more recent data and must include a local and regional analysis in relation to education, economy, transportation and environmental factors. The analysis should include maps and descriptions as appropriate. The element must also include a regional analysis regarding overall access comparing the City to the surrounding region.

Disproportionate Housing Needs: While the element analyzes displacement, it must also include an analysis of all factors related to disproportionate housing needs to include the following:
• Cost Burden: The element has some information on cost burden; however the element must be revised to expand on the local analysis by including overall cost burden and include a regional analysis.
• Risk of Displacement: While the element stated that there was no displacement risk due to investment, it is unclear what data was utilized to reach this conclusion. The element should include an analysis to support the conclusion. In addition, the element must analyze the risk of displacement due to disaster (i.e. fire, flood earthquake).

Overcrowding, substandard housing and homelessness: The element must be revised to include a local and regional analysis of overcrowding, substandard housing and homelessness including looking at trends, patterns, and other local knowledge, and conclude with a summary of issues.

Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 2 December 3, 2021

Sites Inventory: The element must include an analysis demonstrating whether sites identified to meet the RHNA are distributed throughout the community in a manner that AFFH. A full analysis should address the income categories of identified sites with respect to location, the number of sites and units by all income groups and how that effects the existing patterns for all components of the assessment of fair housing (e.g., segregation and integration, access to opportunity). While the element states that sites identified for lower income are disbursed throughout the City, that information should be supported with maps and analysis. Also, the element must describe where the moderate and above moderate sites are located throughout the City. The element should also discuss whether the distribution of sites improves or exacerbates conditions. If sites exacerbate conditions, the element should identify further program actions that will be taken to mitigate this (e.g. anti -displacement strategies).

Contributing Factors: While the element contains information on contributing factors, it must also identify, evaluate, and prioritize the contributing factors to fair housing.

Furthermore, the analysis shall result in strategic approaches to inform and connect goals and actions to mitigate contributing factors to affordable housing.

Goals, Priorities, Metrics, and Milestones: The element must be revised to add or modify goals and actions based on the outcomes of a complete analysis. Goals and actions must specifically respond to the analysis and to the identified and prioritized contributing factors to fair housing issues and must be significant and meaningful enough to overcome identified patterns and trends. Actions must have specific commitment, metrics and milestones as appropriate and must address housing mobility enhancement, new housing choices and affordability in high opportunity areas, place - based strategies for community preservation and revitalization and displacement protection. For more information, please see HCD's guidance at https://www.hcd.ca.gov/community-development/affh/index.shtml#quidance .

2. An inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having realistic and demonstrated potential for redevelopment during the planning period to meet the locality's housing need for a designated income level, and an analysis of the relationship of zoning and public facilities and services to these sites. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(3).)
The City has a regional housing need allocation (RHNA) of 4,193 housing units, of which 2,160 are for lower -income households. To address this need, the element relies on vacant sites, including sites in Specific Plan Areas and within the Affordable Housing Overlay area. To demonstrate the adequacy of these sites and strategies to accommodate the City's RHNA, the element must include complete analyses:

Progress in Meeting the RHNA: The element indicates (p. HBR 52, Table 32) that 159 units are either approved or are in the process of being approved of which 132 are affordable to lower -income households. The element must include additional information on the status of these units including any remaining entitlement that are needed prior to approval, and for projects approved, but not yet built, the jurisdiction must demonstrate the units are expected to be built in the planning period. The Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 3 December 3, 2021

element must also include an analysis to demonstrate the affordability of these units based on actual or projected sales prices, rent levels, or other mechanisms establishing affordability in the planning period.

Sites Inventory: The element must clarify whether all sites in Appendix A are vacant and if the unit count includes realistic capacity assumptions. In addition, the unit count listed in the sites inventory should be the number of units without a decimal, currently there are sites listed that do not equal one unit per site. The sites inventory should include the allowed densities for all sites listed in the inventory. The element must also include a general map of identified sites.

Realistic Capacity: While the element mentions an assumption of 85 percent of maximum allowable densities to calculate residential capacity on identified sites (p. HBR 125), it must also provide support for these assumptions. The capacity methodology must estimate of the number of units for each site based on the land use controls and site improvements, typical densities of existing or approved residential developments at a similar affordability level, and on the current or planned availability and accessibility of sufficient water, sewer, and dry utilities. The element must also provide support for the assumptions within the three specific plans (Old Town, Harveston and Uptown) including accounting for the likelihood of development of 100 percent nonresidential uses. For example, the element could analyze all development activity in these nonresidential zones, how often residential development occurs and adjust residential capacity calculation, policies and program accordingly. The element should include analysis based on factors such as development trends, performance standards or other relevant factors.

Zoning Appropriate for Lower -Income: The element should clarify if the Affordable Housing Overlay which allows up to 30 units per acre applies to these sites. If not, the element must include an analysis evaluating the appropriateness of zoning to accommodate housing affordable to lower -income households. The analysis should be based on factors such as market demand, development experience within zones, and specifically address the impacts of density on financial feasibility. For communities with densities that meet specific standards (at least 30 units per acre for Temecula), this analysis is not required.

Large Sites: Sites larger than ten acres in size are deemed inadequate to accommodate housing for lower -income housing unless it is demonstrated that sites of equivalent size were successfully developed during the prior planning period for an equivalent number of lower -income housing units as projected for the site or unless the housing element describes other evidence to HCD that the site is adequate to accommodate lower -income housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c)(2)(A).) For example, a site with a proposed and approved housing development that contains units affordable to lower -income households would be an appropriate site to accommodate housing for lower -income households. (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c)(2)(C).) In addition, p. HBR 128 states that two of the large sites are City -owned.

The element must identify which sites are owned by the City and include the potential schedule for development. The element must also include a description of whether Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 4 December 3, 2021

there are any plans to sell the property during the planning period and how the jurisdiction will comply with the Surplus Land Act Article 8 (commencing with Section 54220) of Chapter 5 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5.

Availability of Infrastructure: While the element describes water and sewer infrastructure capacity (pg. HBR 106), it must also demonstrate sufficient existing or planned dry utilities, including the availability and access to distribution facilities to accommodate the City's RHNA. The element must also clarify that there is sufficient current or planned water and sewer capacity to meet the RHNA in all specific plans.

Environmental Constraints: While the element generally describes environmental conditions within the City (pg. HBR 111), it must relate those conditions to identified sites within the inventory and describe any other known environmental or other constraints that could impact housing development on identified sites in the planning period.

Accessory Dwelling Units: The element assumes an ADU build out of 18 ADU and/or junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU) per year based upon the City's 2020 production. Given that the City has only produced an average of 6 units per year since 2018, it is not clear if this production level will be achievable in the planning period. As a result, the element should be updated to include a realistic estimate of the potential for ADUs and include policies and programs that incentivize the production of ADUs. Depending on the analysis, the element must commit to monitor ADU production throughout the course of the planning period and implement additional actions if not meeting target numbers anticipated in the housing element. In addition to monitoring production, this program should also monitor affordability.

Additional actions, if necessary, should be taken in a timely manner (e.g., within six months). Finally, if necessary, the degree of additional actions should be in stride with the degree of the gap in production and affordability. For example, if actual production and affordability of ADUs is far from anticipated trends, then rezoning or something similar would be an appropriate action. If actual production and affordability is near anticipated trends, then measures like outreach and marketing might be more appropriate.

Zoning for a Variety of Housing Types:
• Emergency Shelters: While the element states emergency shelters are allowed by right in the Medium and High -Density Residential districts, the element must describe the development standards and requirements. In addition, the element must also demonstrate the zones have sufficient capacity to accommodate the identified housing need and analyze the access to services for zones that allow emergency shelters without conditions. In addition, the element must ensure the parking requirements meet AB 139.
• Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing: The element describes the definition of transitional and supportive housing (p. HBR 95) but does not state whether the City complies. Transitional housing and supportive housing must be permitted as a residential use in all zones allowing residential uses and only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).) The element must describe and analyze Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 5 December 3, 2021

the City's transitional and supportive housing standards and codes and demonstrate consistency with Government Code section 65583, subdivision (a)(5) or add or revise programs which comply with the statutory requirements. • Manufactured Housing: The element identifies manufactured homes as suitable housing in all of its residential zoning districts. However, the housing element must demonstrate the jurisdiction's zoning code allows and permits manufactured housing in the same manner and in the same zone as a conventional or stick -built structures are permitted pursuant to Government Code Section 65852.3. • Agricultural Housing: The element must demonstrate zoning is consistent with the Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code, § 17000 et seq.), specifically, sections 17021.5 and 17021.6. Section 17021.5 requires employee housing for six or fewer employees to be treated as a single-family structure and permitted in the same manner as other dwellings of the same type in the same zone. Section 17021.6 requires employee housing consisting of no more than 12 units or 36 beds to be permitted in the same manner as other agricultural uses in the same zone. • Single Room Occupancy (SRO): The element must clarify zoning that allows SRO units or add a program as appropriate.
• ADUs: The element must also clarify that ADUs are allowed in all zones that allow residential uses.

3. An analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the types of housing identified in paragraph (1) of subdivision (c), and for persons with disabilities as identified in the analysis pursuant to paragraph (7), including land use controls, building codes and their enforcement, site improvements, fees and other exactions required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures. The analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need in accordance with Government Code section 65584 and from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters identified pursuant to paragraph (7). Transitional housing and supportive housing shall be considered a residential use of property and shall be subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).)
Land -Use Controls: The element must identify and analyze all relevant land use controls impacts as potential constraints on a variety of housing types. The analysis should analyze land use controls independently and cumulatively with other land use controls including whether development standards impede the ability to achieve maximum allowable densities. Page HBR 75 lists target densities that are lower than the maximum density and states "The target density establishes a ceiling within the range which cannot be exceeded without Planning Commission/City Council approval." The element must clarify whether densities assumed in the sites inventory can be met without City Council approval and analyze whether this is a constraint and add a program as appropriate. In addition, Table 48 (HBR 80) lists zones that do not include minimum/maximum densities or Floor Area Ratios for the zones listed. The element Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 6 December 3, 2021

must clarify whether residential development is allowed in these zones. In mixed -use overlay, the element must also clarify if residential development is allowed without a commercial component.

Parking: The element must analyze the parking requirements (p. HBR 81) of two spaces for all residential dwelling units for properties with 12 or fewer units for its impact as a potential constraint on housing. Should the analysis determine the parking standards are a constraint on residential development, it must include a program to address or remove any identified constraints.

Fees and Exactions: The element must describe all required fees for single family and multifamily housing development, including environmental and impact fees, and analyze their impact as potential constraints on housing supply and affordability. In addition, the element must clarify if all fees listed in Table 54 (HBR 99) are the same for single family and multifamily developments. For example, the analysis could identify the total amount of fees and their proportion to the development costs for both single family and multifamily housing.

Density Bonus: The City's current density bonus ordinance should be reviewed for compliance with current state density bonus law. (Gov. Code, § 65915.) and programs should be added as appropriate.

Local Ordinances: The element must specifically analyze locally adopted ordinances such as inclusionary ordinances or short-term rental ordinances that directly impact the cost and supply or residential development. The analysis should demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting its share of the regional housing need and from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters.

Processing and Permit Procedures: While the element (p. HBR 104) includes some information about processing times, it should also describe the procedures for a typical single family and multifamily development. The analysis should address the approval body, the number of public hearing if any, approval findings and the element should describe how the standards of decision -making impact development certainty.

Furthermore, the analysis should address impacts on housing cost, supply, timing and approval certainty. For example, the element (Table 57) should identify timeframes for conditional use permits, zoning changes, general plan amendments, site plan review, architectural/design review, parcel and tract maps, environmental impact reports and analyze approval findings for impacts on approval certainty, the presence of processes or guidelines to promote certainty and add or modify programs as appropriate. In addition, the element must analyze the difference in length of time to approve a single- family unit (four to six weeks) versus a multifamily unit (a minimum of a year) as a constraint on development. The element must also describe whether multifamily projects are required to have a discretionary hearing by City Council due to the size of the project (greater than 10,000 square feet) (p. HBR 104). Lastly, the element must address whether projects that are 100 percent affordable will be approved in the affordable housing overlay or whether they must be mixed -income projects (HBR 120).

Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 7 December 3, 2021

Specific Plan: The element must describe any process requirements to develop in the specific plan as well as the process to subdivide lots into developable parcels.

Codes and Enforcement: The element must describe if there are any local amendments to the building code and their enforcement for impacts on housing supply and affordability.

Zoning and Fees Transparency: The element must clarify its compliance with new transparency requirements for posting all zoning and development standards for each parcel on the jurisdiction's website pursuant to Government Code section 65940.1, subdivision (a)(1).

Constraints on Housing for Persons with Disabilities:

Group Homes: The element must analyze and revise requirements for both group homes for six or fewer residents as well as group homes for seven or more residents. Group homes for six or fewer residents must be allowed by -right in all residential zones. While the element conditionally permits the use for residential care facilities serving seven or more persons in residential and commercial zones, the element must include the City's process for objectively approving the conditional use permit and the description of the compatibility findings. The element must include the decisions making criteria as an objective procedure. The element also states it requires the State Fire Marshal's approval for group homes of seven or more residents. The element must be revised to analyze the process as a potential constraint on housing for persons with disabilities and add or modify programs as appropriate to ensure zoning permits group homes objectively with approval certainty.

Reasonable Accommodation Procedure: While the element (p. HBR103) indicates the City does have a reasonable accommodation procedure, it must list the specific findings and requirements for requesting and granting a reasonable accommodation separate from the conditional use permit procedures. The procedure should not be limited to the installation of accessibility improvements and must provide reasonable accommodations to zoning and land -use requirements for housing for persons with disabilities.

4. An analysis of potential and actual nongovernmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels, including the availability of financing, the price of land, the cost of construction, the requests to develop housing at densities below those anticipated in the analysis required by subdivision (c) of Government Code section 65583.2, and the length of time between receiving approval for a housing development and submittal of an application for building permits for that housing development that hinder the construction of a locality's share of the regional housing need in accordance with Government Code section 65584. The analysis shall also demonstrate local efforts to remove nongovernmental constraints that create a gap between the locality's planning for the development of housing for all income levels and the construction of that housing. (Gov. Code, § Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 8 December 3, 2021

65583, subd. (a)(6).)
The element must contain an analysis of potential nongovernmental constraints including the following:
• Land Costs: Estimate the average cost per acre for single-family and multifamily zoned developable parcels.
• Availability of Financing: The element must include an analysis of whether housing financing, including private financing and government assistance programs, is generally available in the community.

Developed Densities and Permit Times: The element must be revised to include analysis of requests to develop housing at densities below those anticipated, and the length of time between receiving approval for a housing development and submittal of an application for building permits that potentially hinder the construction of a locality's share of the regional housing need.

5. Analyze any special housing needs such as elderly; persons with disabilities, including a developmental disability, large families; farmworkers; families with female heads of households; and families and persons in need of emergency shelter. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(7).)
Farmworker Housing: The element indicates that there are only 228 farmworkers employed farming occupations in the City. However, farmworkers from the broader area and those employed seasonally may have housing needs, including within the City's boundaries. As a result, the element should at least acknowledge the housing needs of permanent and seasonal farmworkers at a county -level (e.g., using USDA county -level farmworker data) and include programs as appropriate.

6. Analyze existing assisted housing developments that are eligible to change to nonlow- income housing uses during the next 10 years due to termination of subsidy contracts, mortgage prepayment, or expiration of use restrictions. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(9) through 65583(a)(9)(D).)
While the element identifies 180 units for being at risk, the element lists four properties that are at -risk of expiring within the next 10 years for a total of 256 units. In addition, the element should describe any outreach to owners and interest in preserving the units identified. The element must identify local public agencies, public or private nonprofit corporations, and for -profit organizations with the legal and managerial capacity to acquire and manage at -risk projects pursuant to Government Code Section 65583, subdivision (a)(8)(C)). In addition, the element must list potential federal, state, and local funding sources that can be used to preserve the units.

While the element analyzes the cost of replacement for units designated high risk, the element must analyze replacement costs for all units with expiring restrictions in the next ten years. Furthermore, the analysis should contain the following:

Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 9 December 3, 2021

Estimate the costs of producing new rental housing (comparable in size and rent levels to existing at -risk units) to replace units converting from affordable to market rate. The analysis should consider current land costs and either current construction costs (square footage rates for multifamily development) or the actual cost of recently completed units.

Estimate the cost of preserving the identified assisted housing developments including acquisition and rehabilitation costs long-term affordability controls and project -based rent subsidies.

A project -by -project replacement/preservation cost estimate is not required (Government Code Section 65583(a)(8)(B)). The element can make an assessment of the appropriate strategy (replace vs. preserve) based on sample cost estimates.

C. Housing Programs
Include a program which sets forth a schedule of actions during the planning period, each with a timeline for implementation, which may recognize that certain programs are ongoing, such that there will be beneficial impacts of the programs within the planning period, that the local government is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies and achieve the goals and objectives of the Housing Element through the administration of land use and development controls, the provision of regulatory concessions and incentives, and the utilization of appropriate federal and state financing and subsidy programs when available. The program shall include an identification of the agencies and officials responsible for the implementation of the various actions. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c).)
To address the program requirements of Gov. Code section 65583, subd. (c)(1-6), and to facilitate implementation, programs should include: (1) a description of the City's specific role in implementation; (2) all programs must be revised with discrete timelines (i.e. month and year); (3) objectives, quantified where appropriate; and (4) identification of responsible agencies and officials. Programs to be revised include the following:
• Program 6 (Density Bonus Ordinance): The program must be revised to include outreach to developers as well as how often the law will be monitored for updates and potential revisions.
• Program 7 (Land Assemblage and Affordable Housing Development): The program should be revised to include specific incentives to developers and include a how often outreach will occur within the planning period. • Program 10 (Mortgage Credit Certificate Program): The program must update when the certification program will be implemented.
• Program 12 (Development Fees): The program should be updated to include outreach to developers and to revise the timeframe to include how often the program will be implemented within the planning period. • Program 13 (Expedite Processing of Affordable Housing Projects): The element must clarify when the objective criteria will be developed and adopted as well as include proactive outreach to developers.

Review of the City of Temecula 6` Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 10 December 3, 2021

• Program 19 (Residential Improvement Program): The program must be revised to include how often the City will apply for funds throughout the planning period.

2. Identify actions that will be taken to make sites available during the planning period with appropriate zoning and development standards and with services and facilities to accommodate that portion of the city's or county's share of the regional housing need for each income level that could not be accommodated on sites identified in the inventory completed pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (a) without rezoning, and to comply with the requirements of Government Code section 65584.09. Sites shall be identified as needed to facilitate and encourage the development of a variety of types of housing for all income levels, including multifamily rental housing, factory -built housing, mobilehomes, housing for agricultural employees, supportive housing, single - room occupancy units, emergency shelters, and transitional housing. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(1).)
As noted in Finding B3, the element does not include a complete site analysis, therefore, the adequacy of sites and zoning were not established. Based on the results of a complete sites inventory and analysis, the City may need to add or revise programs to address a shortfall of sites or zoning available to encourage a variety of housing types. In addition, the element should be revised as follows:

Previously Identified Nonvacant and Vacant Sites: While the element includes a policy regarding sites identified for lower income that were listed in previous elements, this must be revised as a program with a specific timeframe for implementation. If nonvacant sites identified in a prior adopted housing element or vacant sites identified in two or more consecutive planning periods, the sites are inadequate to accommodate housing for lower -income households unless:

The site's current zoning is appropriate for the development of housing affordable to lower -income households by either including analysis or meeting the appropriate density. See (Gov.Code section 65583.2, subdivision (c)(3)), and The site is subject to a housing element program that requires rezoning within three years of the beginning of the planning period to allow residential use by right for housing developments in which at least 20 percent of the units are affordable to lower income households (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c).).

Program 1 (Land Use Policy and Development Capacity): This program mentions utilizing credits for constructed units towards the RHNA. If the units were constructed before June 30, 2021 they cannot count toward the 6t" cycle RHNA. In addition, the program must include how often the inventory will be monitored and updated.

Program 3 (Public Property Conversion to Housing Program): This program should include a schedule of actions to facilitate development on City owned sites during the planning period. For example, the program could include zoning, outreach with developers, incentives, fee waivers, priority processing, or financial assistance.

Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 11 December 3, 2021

Program 14 (Emergency Shelters and Transitional/Supportive Housing): As noted in Finding B.3, the element describes transitional housing as allowed in the same manner as emergency shelters, i.e., with a conditional use permit. However, transitional housing and supportive housing must be permitted as a residential use in all zones allowing residential uses and only subject to those restrictions that apply to other residential dwellings of the same type in the same zone. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (a)(5).) The element must demonstrate consistency with Section 65583(a)(5) or add or revise programs which comply with the statutory requirements. In addition, this program must be implemented early in the planning period.

Housing for Agricultural Employees: As mentioned in finding B3, if the zoning code is not consistent with the Employee Housing Act (Health and Safety Code, § 17000 et seq.), specifically, sections 17021.5 and 17021.6, the element must include a program to revise the zoning code.

3. The housing element shall contain programs which assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate - income households. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(2).)
Program 8 (Housing for Extremely Low -Income Households): While Program 8 identifies SRO units and efficiency housing units to assist in meeting the needs of extremely low-income (ELI) households, it does not address the identified needs of larger ELI households. The element must also confirm whether the identified program incentives are currently in place or if they need to be adopted within the planning period.

4. Address and, where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, including housing for all income levels and housing for persons with disabilities. The program shall remove constraints to, and provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for, intended for occupancy by, or with supportive services for, persons with disabilities. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(3).) As noted in Finding(s) B.4 and B.5, the element requires a complete analysis of potential governmental and nongovernmental constraints. Depending upon the results of that analysis, the City may need to revise or add programs and address and remove or mitigate any identified constraints. In addition, the following must be addressed:

Program 9 (Special Needs Housing Construction): The program should be revised to specifically list which special needs groups are included and what incentives will be offered to developers.

Program 16 (Zoning Code Amendments — Housing Constraints): This program must be revised to include permanent supportive housing by -right (AB 2162) as well as the residential care findings mentioned above in B.4.

Review of the City of Temecula 6' Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 12 December 3, 2021

Program to Mitigate Nongovernmental Constraints: The element must be revised to include a program that mitigates nongovernmental constraints that create a gap in the jurisdictions ability to meet RHNA by income category (Gov. Code, § 65583.2, subd. (c)(3).).

5. Promote and affirmatively further fair housing opportunities and promote housing throughout the community or communities for all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, color, familial status, or disability, and other characteristics protected by the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Part 2.8 (commencing with Section 12900) of Division 3 of Title 2), Section 65008, and any other state and federal fair housing and planning law. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c) (5).)
While the element includes Program 22 (Equal Housing Opportunity), the program should be revised to commit to annual outreach, enforcement, and education. In addition, programs throughout the element should be revised to integrate the fair housing analysis. Actions must have specific commitment, metrics and milestones as appropriate and must address housing mobility enhancement, new housing choices and affordability in high opportunity areas, place -based strategies for community preservation and revitalization and displacement protection.

6. The housing program shall preserve for low-income household the assisted housing developments identified pursuant to paragraph (9) of subdivision (a). The program for preservation of the assisted housing developments shall utilize, to the extent necessary, all available federal, state, and local financing and subsidy programs identified in paragraph (9) of subdivision (a), except where a community has other urgent needs for which alternative funding sources are not available. The program may include strategies that involve local regulation and technical assistance. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(6).)
Program 17 (Preserve At -Risk Housing Units): The program must be revised to include specific and proactive actions to preserve the at -risk units in addition to monitoring. In addition, the element should revise (c) tenant education, to include current State Preservation Notice Law (Gov. Code 65863.10, 65863.11, 65863.13) which requires owners to provide tenants and affected public entities (including the City) notices regarding expiring rental restrictions starting three years before expiration.

7. Develop a plan that incentivizes and promotes the creation of accessory dwelling units that can be offered at affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code, for very low, low-, or moderate -income households. For purposes of this paragraph, "accessory dwelling units" has the same meaning as "accessory dwelling unit' as defined in paragraph (4) of subdivision (i) of Section 65852.2. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c)(7).)
While the element includes Program 5 (ADUs), the City should provide specific incentives to promote the development. In addition, the timeframe should be revised to Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 13 December 3, 2021

include how often the City will monitor ADU production, as well as review and update the ordinance to comply with state law.

D. Public Participation
Local governments shall make a diligent effort to achieve public participation of all economic segments of the community in the development of the housing element, and the element shall describe this effort. (Gov. Code, § 65583, subd. (c) (8).) While appendix C tabulates general comments and goals from public comments, the element must also include the missing summary of public participation (p. HBR 6). In addition, the element must include information on whether the housing survey was available in multiple languages and how public comments were incorporated.

Review of the City of Temecula 6t" Cycle Draft Housing Element Page 14 December 3, 2021

PC RESOLUTION NO.2022-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF

THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE UPDATED 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN (LONG
RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR18-1620) AND
APPROVING EIR ADDENDUM NO. 2021-01 TO THE
GENERAL PLAN"
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine, and declare that:

A. The City of Temecula adopted its first Housing Element (Second Cycle) on November 9, 1993.

B. The City of Temecula first amended its Housing Element (Third Cycle) on October 8, 2002.

C. The City of Temecula adopted a Comprehensive Update of its General Plan on April 12, 2005.

D. The City of Temecula amended its Housing Element (Fourth Cycle) on July 27, 2010.

E. The City of Temecula amended its Dousing Element (Fifth Cycle) on January, 2014.

F. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) completed the Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) on March 4, 2021, with a minor amendment adopted on July 1, 2021.

G. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) approved the RHNA allocation on March 22, 2021.

H. Government Code Section 65588 establishes October 15, 2021, as the due date for cities located in the SCAG region to submit their 2021-2029 Housing Element Update to the State.

I. The City of Temecula must adopt its updated 2021-2029 Housing Element within 120 days of the above -referenced due date.

J. The Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element includes an analysis of potential sites that indicates that the City of Temecula has adequate development capacity under existing zoning designations to meet its RHNA of 4,139 total units and related affordable housing needs for lower and moderate income households.

K. On August 17, 2021, the Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element was released to the community for public comment and review including to groups that represent lower income and special needs populations in Temecula.

L. On August 17, 2021, the City hosted a community open house to introduce the Draft Housing Element and solicit public feedback on the draft Housing Element.

M. On , the City held a public hearing before the Planning Commission where the draft Housing Element was considered. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council adopt the Housing Element for submission to HCD.

N. On October 12, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing where the draft Housing Element was considered. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council adopted the draft Housing Element with the understanding that the Housing Element may need to be further amended in response to any comments received by HCD.

O. On October 27, 2021, the City hosted a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) workshop, which included a discussion on the draft Housing Element.

P. HCD provided a comment letter to the City on December 3, 2021, and staff working with its consultant, has amended the draft Housing Element in response to HCD's comments.

Q. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, codified at Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR § 15000 et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update (the Project); and
R. This Housing Element Update was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by law.

S. The Planning Commission considered the updated 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan and environmental review on January 19, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.

T. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update, and EIR Addendum No. 2021-01 to the General Plan based upon the findings set forth hereunder.

U. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.

Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending that the City Council adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that:

General Plan Amendment

A. The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City.

The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update has been designed to be consistent with State Housing Law, the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for local agencies under jurisdiction of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), and to be internally consistent with the other elements of the Temecula General Plan with implementation of the identified programs.

B. The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan will not have a significant impact on the character of the built environment; The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update is compatible with the nature, condition and development of existing uses, buildings and structures and will not adversely affect the existing or planned uses, buildings, or structures. The Housing Element Update contains the goals, policies, and programs that will help guide the production of future housing within the City, in concert with other elements of the General Plan. The Housing Element Update will provide flexibility and opportunity in the development of residential uses to meet the needs of all economic segments of the community within the City. The specific programs of the Housing Element Update will provide opportunityfor affordable housing through the identification of appropriate sites and density, provisions for density bonus law, provisions for transitional, supportive, and employee housing, as well as establishment of development standards for emergency shelters. The Housing Element and the City's current General Plan have adequate capacity to accommodate all units. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the General Plan FEIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed updates to the General Plan Housing Element do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required.

C. The nature of the proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and Minor Updates to the Public Safety Element of the General Plan is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community;
The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update will promote the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the City and its residents through the goals, policies, and implementation programs geared towards ensuring adequate housing for all income levels in the community. The proposed Housing Element Update complies with all statutory requirements and is internally consistent with the other elements of the General Plan with implementation of the identified programs. The proposed Housing Element will not expose people to an increased risk of negative health or public safety impacts and potential impacts related to the health, safety and general welfare of the community were analyzed in the environmental review and determined to be less than significant as a result of this project. The Housing Element and the City's current General Plan have adequate capacity to accommodate all units. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an

Addendum to the General Plan FEIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed updates to the General Plan Housing Element do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required.

Section 3. Further Findings. The Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element has been prepared to meet the requirements of State law and local housing objectives, and is consistent with the other elements of the current Temecula General Plan.

Section 4. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommendation for approval of the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan, Long Range Planning Project No. LR18-1620.

A. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff has reviewed and considered the Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") for the General Plan certified by the City Council on April 12, 2005 (State Clearinghouse No. 2003061041), including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Staff has also reviewed the Harveston Specific Plan Amendment Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2019070974), Altair Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2014111029) and Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (State Clearinghouse No. 2013061012).

B. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the General Plan FEIR (Addendum 2021-01) was prepared in August 2021 which concludes that the draft General Plan Housing Element does not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. No new development is permitted under the draft Housing Element where it is not currently permitted in the General Plan, and all new development analyzed in the draft Housing Element is in areas already designated for residential or mixed use. In addition, no new information of substantial importance has surfaced since the certification of the General Plan EIR. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required. The draft Housing Element was amended in response to HCD's comments. The 2021- 2029 Housing Element Update, as revised in response to HCD's comments, does not create any new program or policy that would permit residential development where it is not otherwise permitted. As such, it was determined that the revisions to the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated, and that it is still appropriate for the City to rely on Addendum 2021-01.

It was determined that a supplemental or subsequent EIR do not need to be prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and no further environmental review is required.

C. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the General Plan Addendum 2021-01 prepared for this project that is attached as Exhibit "A" to the draft City Council resolution.

Section 5. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula herby recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution adopting the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan and General Plan EIR Addendum 2021-01 in substantially the same form as attached here to as Exhibit "A".

PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 19th day of January 2022.

Watts, Chairperson
Secretary
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-03 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 19th day of January 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: 3 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Telesio, Turley-Trejo NOES: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Watts
ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
Ruiz
00, uke Watson
Secretary

RESOLUTION NO. 2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE UPDATED 2021-2029

HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN (LONG
RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR18-1620) AND

APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
ADDENDUM NO. 2021-01 TO THE GENERAL PLAN

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine, and declare that:

A. The City of Temecula adopted its first Housing Element (Second Cycle) on November 9, 1993.

B. The City of Temecula first amended its Housing Element (Third Cycle) on October 8, 2002.

C. The City of Temecula adopted a Comprehensive Update of its General Plan on April 12, 2005.

D. The City of Temecula amended its Housing Element (Fourth Cycle) on July 27, 2010.

E. The City of Temecula amended its Housing Element (Fifth Cycle) on January, 2014.

F. The City of Temecula amended its Housing Element (Sixth Cycle) on October 12, 2021.

G. The Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) completed the Sixth Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) on March 4, 2021, with a minor amendment adopted on July 1, 2021.

H. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) approved the RHNA allocation on March 22, 2021.

I. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) provided a comment letter on December 3, 2021.

J. Government Code Section 65588 establishes October 15, 2021, as the due date for cities located in the SCAG region to submit their 2021-2029 Housing Element Update to the State.

K. The City of Temecula must adopt its 2021-2029 Housing Element within 120 days of the above -referenced due date.

L. The Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element includes an analysis of potential sites that indicates that the City of Temecula has adequate development capacity under existing zoning designations to meet its RHNA of 4,139 total units and related affordable housing needs for lower and moderate income households.

M. On August 17, 2021, the Draft 2021-2029 Housing Element was released to the community for public comment and review including to groups that represent lower income and special needs populations in Temecula; and
N. On August 17, 2021, the City hosted a community open house to introduce the Draft Housing Element and solicit public feedback on the Housing Element O. On October 27, 2021, the City hosted a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) workshop, which included a discussion on Housing Element.

P. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, codified at Public Resources Code § 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 CCR § 15000 et seq.), the City is the lead agency for the adoption of the 2021-2029 Housing Element (the Project); and Q. This Housing Element Update was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by law.

R. The Planning Commission considered the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan and environmental review on January 19, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.

S. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-XX recommending that the City Council adopt the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan, and EIR Addendum No. 2021-01 to the General Plan, based upon the findings set forth hereunder.

T. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the 2021-2029 Housing Element (Sixth Cycle) of the General Plan at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter.

U. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council adopted the EIR Addendum No. 2021-01 to the General Plan and the 2021-2029 Housing Element (Sixth Cycle) of the General Plan, Long Range Planning Project No.

LR18-1620 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder.

V. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.

Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in adopting the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update hereby finds, determines and declares that:

General Plan Amendment

B. The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan will not have a significant impact on the character of the built environment; The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update is compatible with the nature, condition and development of existing uses, buildings and structures and will not adversely affect the existing or planned uses, buildings, or structures. The Housing Element Update contains the goals, policies, and programs that will help guide the production of future housing within the City, in concert with other elements of the General Plan. The Housing Element Update will provide flexibility and opportunity in the development of residential uses to meet the needs of all economic segments of the community within the City. The specific programs of the Housing Element Update will provide opportunity for affordable housing through the identification of appropriate sites and density, provisions for density bonus law, provisions for transitional, supportive, and employee housing, as well as establishment of development standards for emergency shelters. The Housing Element and the City s current General Plan have adequate capacity to accommodate all units. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the General Plan FEIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed updates to the General Plan Housing Element do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required.

C. The nature of the proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community; The proposed 2021-2029 Housing Element Update will promote the health, safety, comfort and general welfare of the City and its residents through the goals, policies, and implementation programs geared towards ensuring adequate housing for all income levels in the community. The proposed Housing Element Update complies with all statutory requirements and is internally consistent with the other elements of the General Plan with implementation of the identified programs. The proposed Housing Element will not expose people to an increased risk of negative health or public safety impacts and potential impacts related to the health, safety and general welfare of the community were analyzed in the environmental review and determined to be less than significant as a result of this project. The Housing Element and the City s current General Plan have adequate capacity to accommodate all units. In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 an Addendum to the General Plan FEIR has been prepared which concludes that the proposed

updates to the General Plan Housing Element do not result in any new or greater environmental impacts than were previously analyzed, disclosed, and mitigated. None of the conditions in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 are present to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, and no additional environmental review is required.

Section 4. Environmental Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the recommendation for approval of the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update of the General Plan, Long Range Planning Project No. LR18-1620.

It was determined that a supplemental or subsequent EIR do not need to be prepared pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, and that no further environmental review is required.

C. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council herby adopts General Plan Addendum 2021-01 prepared for this project.

Section 4. Adoption. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby adopts the 2021-2029 Housing Element Update and General Plan Addendum 2021-01 in substantially the same form as attached here to as Exhibit "A"

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this day of February, 2022.

Matt Rahn, Mayor
ATTEST:

Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss

CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Randi Johl, City Clerk

P: (626) 381-9248 0 155 South Hudson Avenue
F: (626) 389-5414 Mitchell M. Tsai Suite 200
E: [email protected] Attorney At Law Pasadena, California 91101

VIA E-MAIL
January 19, 2022
City of Temecula
Council Chambers
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Em: stuart.fisk&temeculaca.gov
RE: City of Temecula's 6th Cycle RHNA Housing Element Update Dear Commissioners,
On behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters ("Southwest Carpenters" or "SWRCC"), my Office is submitting these comments on the City of Temecula's ("City") Agenda Item No. 2 for the City's January 19, 2022 Planning Commission meeting, regarding the 6th Cycle RHNA Housing Element Update ("Project").

The Southwest Carpenters is a labor union representing more than 50,000 union carpenters in six states and has a strong interest in well ordered land use planning and addressing the environmental impacts of development projects.

Individual members of the Southwest Carpenters live, work and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project's environmental impacts.

SWRCC expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearings and proceedings related to this Project. Cal. Gov. Code § 65009(b); Cal. Pub. Res. Code 5 21177(a); Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control P. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal. App. 4th 1184, 1199-1203; see Galante Vineyards P. Monterey rater Dist. (1997) 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121.

SWRCC incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the EIR submitted prior to certification of the EIR for the Project. Citizens for Clean Energy v City

City of Temecula — 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
January 19, 2022

Page 2 ends

of Wloodland (2014) 225 Cal. App. 4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the Project's environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties).

Moreover, SWRCC requests that the Lead Agency provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Cal Public Resources Code ("PRC") 5 21000 et seq, and the California Planning and Zoning Law ("Planning and Zoning Law"), Cal. Gov't Code §§ 65000-65010. California Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(1 and Government Code Section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency's governing body.

The City should require the use of a local skilled and trained workforce to benefit the community's economic development and environment. The City should require the use of workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor Management apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California, or have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state approved apprenticeship training program or who are registered apprentices in an apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California.

Community benefits such as local hire and skilled and trained workforce requirements can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project Site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and providing localized economic benefits. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project Site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and providing localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note:
[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

City of Temecula — 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
January 19, 2022

Page 3 ends

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling.

Skilled and trained workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
.. labor should be considered an investment rather than a cost — and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California's workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.'
Local skilled and trained workforce requirements and policies have significant environmental benefits since they improve an area's jobs -housing balance, decreasing the amount of and length of job commutes and their associated greenhouse gas emissions. Recently, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the "[u] se of a local state -certified apprenticeship program or a skilled and trained workforce with a local hire component" can result in air pollutant reductions.2
Cities are increasingly adopting local skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements into general plans and municipal codes. For example, the City of Hayward 2040 General Plan requires the City to "promote local hiring ... to help achieve a more positive jobs -housing balance, and reduce regional commuting, gas consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions."3
1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https: / /laborcenter.berkeleLedu/ w�p-content/uploads /2020 /09 /Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 — Warehouse Indirect Source Rule — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 — Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021 /2021-May7-027.12dfpsfvrsn=10 a City of Hayward (2014) Hayward 2040 General Plan Policy Document at p. 3-99, available at https://www.hayward-ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/General Plan FINAL.pdf.

City of Temecula — 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
January 19, 2022

Page 4 ends

In fact, the City of Hayward has gone as far as to adopt a Skilled Labor Force policy into its Downtown Specific Plan and municipal code, requiring developments in its Downtown area to requiring that the City "[c]ontribute to the stabilization of regional construction markets by spurring applicants of housing and nonresidential developments to require contractors to utilize apprentices from state -approved, joint labor-management training programs,.. ."' In addition, the City of Hayward requires all projects 30,000 square feet or larger to "utilize apprentices from state -approved, joint labor-management training programs.115
Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits. As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:

People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.'
In addition, local hire mandates as well as skill training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled. As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions since the skill requirements of available local jobs must be matched to those held by local residents.' Some municipalities have tied local hire and skilled and trained workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. As Cervero and Duncan note:

In nearly built -out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing." The city's First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, a City of Hayward (2019) Hayward Downtown Specific Plan at p. 5-24, available at https: / / www.hayward-ca.gov/sites /default/files /Ha3ward%20Downtown% 20S12ecific%20Plan.12df.
5 City of Hayward Municipal Code, Chapter 10, § 28.5.3.020(C).

California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs -Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs- housing_pdf
Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs - Housing Balance or Retail -Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available athtip://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Up1oads/UTCT- 825.12df.

City of Temecula — 6th Cycle Housing Element Update
January 19, 2022

Page 5 of 5 ends

especially for entry- and intermediate -level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment -ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.

The City should consider utilizing skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and mitigate greenhouse gas, air quality and transportation impacts.

Sincerely,
Mitchell M. Tsai
Attorneys for Southwest Regional
Council of Carpenters
Attached:

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C).

EXHIBIT A

S� p Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and
JLitigation Support for the Environment
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 8, 2021
Mitchell M. Tsai
155 South El Molino, Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101
Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai,
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise ("SWAPE") is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts.

Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations
The California Emissions Estimator Model ("CaIEEMod") is a "statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects."' CaIEEMod quantifies construction -related emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off -road construction equipment; on -road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on -road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2
The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' 1 "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home .

Z "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home . 3 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 1 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled ("VMT") associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle -class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CaIEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction -related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4
Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CaIEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below):
"VMTd = F(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length 1) n Where:
n = Number of land uses being modeled."'
Furthermore, to calculate the on -road emissions associated with worker trips, CaIEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below):
"EmisslonSpollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant
Where:

Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled
EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions."' Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise.

Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CaIEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site -specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project - specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.' The default number of construction -related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the 4 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, P. 23. ' "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 "CalEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. $ CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/ , p. 1, 9. 2 number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9 Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively."10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home -to -work vehicle trips.11 The operational home -to -work vehicle trip lengths are:
"[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings" (emphasis added)." Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CaIEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
Air Basin
Rural (miles)
Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys

16.8 10.8
Lake County

16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe

16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert

16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties

16.8 10.8
North Central Coast

17.1 12.3
North Coast

16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau

16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley

16.8 10.8
Salton Sea

14.6 11
San Diego

16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area

10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley

16.8 10.8
South Central Coast

16.8 10.8
South Coast

19.8 14.7
Average

16.47 11.17
Minimum

10.80 10.80
Maximum

19.80 14.70
Range

9.00 3.90
9 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 11 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14. 12 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21. 13 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 - D-86. 3 As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location.

Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction -related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan ("Project") located in the City of Claremont ("City"). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles -South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project's construction -related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C).

Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year)
3,623
120.77
With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e)
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year)
% Decrease in Construction -related GHG Emissions
3,024
100.80
17%
As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project -level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction -related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project's urbanization level and location.
14 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 4 Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,
G
Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.
�p
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
5 Attachment A
Rural H-W
Urban H-W
Location Type
Location Name
(miles)
(miles)
Air Basin
Great Basin

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Lake County

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Lake Tahoe

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Mojave Desert

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Mountain

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
North Central

17.1 12.3
Air Basin
North Coast

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Northeast

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Sacramento

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
Salton Sea

14.6 11
Air Basin
San Diego

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
San Francisco

10.8 10.8
Air Basin
San Joaquin

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
South Central

16.8 10.8
Air Basin
South Coast

19.8 14.7
Air District
Amador County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Antelope Valley

16.8 10.8
Air District
Bay Area AQMD

10.8 10.8
Air District
Butte County

12.54 12.54
Air District
Calaveras

16.8 10.8
Air District
Colusa County

16.8 10.8
Air District
El Dorado

16.8 10.8
Air District
Feather River

16.8 10.8
Air District
Glenn County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Great Basin

16.8 10.8
Air District
Imperial County

10.2 7.3
Air District
Kern County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Lake County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Lassen County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Mariposa

16.8 10.8
Air District
Mendocino

16.8 10.8
Air District
Modoc County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Mojave Desert

16.8 10.8
Air District
Monterey Bay

16.8 10.8
Air District
North Coast

16.8 10.8
Air District
Northern Sierra

16.8 10.8
Air District
Northern

16.8 10.8
Air District
Placer County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Sacramento
15 10

Air District
San Diego

16.8 10.8
Air District
San Joaquin

16.8 10.8
Air District
San Luis Obispo
13 13
Air District
Santa Barbara

8.3 8.3
Air District
Shasta County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Siskiyou County

16.8 10.8
Air District
South Coast

19.8 14.7
Air District
Tehama County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Tuolumne

16.8 10.8
Air District
Ventura County

16.8 10.8
Air District
Yolo/Solano
15 10
County
Alameda

10.8 10.8
County
Alpine

16.8 10.8
County
Amador

16.8 10.8
County
Butte

12.54 12.54
County
Calaveras

16.8 10.8
County
Colusa

16.8 10.8
County
Contra Costa

10.8 10.8
County
Del Norte

16.8 10.8
County
El Dorado -Lake

16.8 10.8
County
El Dorado-

16.8 10.8
County
Fresno

16.8 10.8
County
Glenn

16.8 10.8
County
Humboldt

16.8 10.8
County
Imperial

10.2 7.3
County
Inyo

16.8 10.8
County
Kern -Mojave

16.8 10.8
County
Kern -San

16.8 10.8
County
Kings

16.8 10.8
County
Lake

16.8 10.8
County
Lassen

16.8 10.8
County
Los Angeles-

19.8 14.7
County
Madera

16.8 10.8
County
Marin

10.8 10.8
County
Mariposa

16.8 10.8
County
Mendocino-

16.8 10.8
County
Merced

16.8 10.8
County
Modoc

16.8 10.8
County
Mono

16.8 10.8
County
Monterey

16.8 10.8
County
Napa

10.8 10.8

County
Nevada

16.8 10.8
County
Orange

19.8 14.7
County
Placer -Lake

16.8 10.8
County
Placer -Mountain

16.8 10.8
County
Placer-

16.8 10.8
County
Plumas

16.8 10.8
County
Riverside-

19.8 14.7
County
Riverside -Salton

14.6 11
County
Riverside -South

19.8 14.7
County
Sacramento
15 10
County
San Benito

16.8 10.8
County
San Bernardino-

19.8 14.7
County
San Diego

16.8 10.8
County
San Francisco

10.8 10.8
County
San Joaquin

16.8 10.8
County
San Luis Obispo
13 13
County
San Mateo

10.8 10.8
County
Santa Barbara-

8.3 8.3
County
Santa Barbara-

8.3 8.3
County
Santa Clara

10.8 10.8
County
Santa Cruz

16.8 10.8
County
Shasta

16.8 10.8
County
Sierra

16.8 10.8
County
Siskiyou

16.8 10.8
County
Solano-
15 10
County
Solano-San

16.8 10.8
County
Sonoma -North

16.8 10.8
County
Sonoma -San

10.8 10.8
County
Stanislaus

16.8 10.8
County
Sutter

16.8 10.8
County
Tehama

16.8 10.8
County
Trinity

16.8 10.8
County
Tulare

16.8 10.8
County
Tuolumne

16.8 10.8
County
Ventura

16.8 10.8
County
Yolo
15 10
County
Yuba

16.8 10.8
Statewide
Statewide

16.8 10.8

Worker
Air Basin
Great Basin Valleys
Lake County
Lake Tahoe
Mojave Desert
Mountain Counties
North Central Coast
North Coast
Northeast Plateau
Sacramento Valley
Salton Sea
San Diego
San Francisco Bay Area
San Joaquin Valley
South Central Coast
South Coast
Average
Mininum
Maximum
Range
igth by Air Basin
Rural (miles)

16.8 16.8

16.8 17.1

16.8 16.8

16.8 14.6

16.8 10.8

16.8 16.8

19.8 16.47

10.80 19.80

9.00 Urban (miles)

10.8 10.8

10.8 12.3

10.8 10.8

10.8 11

10.8 10.8

14.7 11.17

10.80 14.70

3.90 Attachment B
CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building

45.00 +
1000sgft
; 1.03
45,000.00
i 0
---------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- -
h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 +
High
= — — ;--------------------
1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0
-----------------------------_------------------------------ _------------------------------ Hotel 50.00 +
= — -- —;------------- -------
Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0
-----------y----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 +
= --- ---—;--------------------
1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0
----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Apartments Low Rise 25.00 +
= --- ---------
—;-------------
Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72
-----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------=-----------------------i------------------+--------------- Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 +
Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789
------------------------------ _------------------------------ _----------------------------- --------------}------------------E-------------
Regional Shopping Center

56.00 1000sgft

1.29 56,000.00
0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr)

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblFireplaces
FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20

0.00 ----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00
-------------p-------------_-------------------
tblFire laces
------------ --------------------------
NumberWood r 1.25 0.00
----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------r----------------------------- ------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00
---------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------ -------------------------
ST_TR r 7.16 6.17
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
--------------------------------------
ST_TR r 158.37 79.82
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
--------------------------------------
ST_TR r 8.19 3.75
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
ST_TR r 94.36 63.99
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
ST_TR r 49.97 10.74
----------------------------_-----------------
tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
SU_TR r 6.07 6.16
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18
----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips
---------------------------------------
SU_TR r 1.05 0.69
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR

5.95 3.20
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips

Y----------------------------
SU_TR
�-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16

57.65 tblVehicleTrips
SU_TR
} 25.24

6.39 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 6.59

5.83 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 6.65

4.13 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 11.03

6.41 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 127.15

65.80 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 8.17

3.84 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 89.95

62.64 tblVehicleTrips
WD_TR
} 42.70

9.43 tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
} 1.25

0.00 tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
} 48.75

0.00 tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
} 1.25

0.00 tblWoodstoves
NumberNoncatalytic
} 48.75

0.00 tblWoodstoves
Wood stove DayYear
} 25.00

0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
i 999.60

0.00 tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60

0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1969 213.1969 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6993 003
-------------
2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i �
'� i i i i i i i i • 1 6 i 6 i i i 7
2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3649 � 5.6747 i 0.0178 � 1.1963 � 0.0996 i 1.2959 � 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 � 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492 '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i 5
2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9078 52.9078 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 1 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i
Maximum

4.1619

4.1142

6.1625

0.0189

1.3058

0.1201

1.4259

0.3460

0.1128

0.4588

0.0000
1,721.682
1,721.682

0.1294

0.0000
1,724.918
6 6
7 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

2.1 Overall Construction
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1967 � 213.1967 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6991 003
2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i
3 i 3 i i i 3
2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3648 5.6747 i 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 i 1.2959 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492 2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9077 52.9077 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i
Maximum

4.1619

4.1142

6.1625

0.0189

1.3058

0.1201

1.4259

0.3460

0.1128

0.4588

0.0000
1,721.682
1,721.682

0.1294

0.0000
1,724.918
3 3
3 ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio-0O2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Reduction
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1 9-1-2021
11-30-2021

1.4103

1.4103
2 12-1-2021
2-28-2022

1.3613

1.3613
3 3-1-2022
5-31-2022

1.1985

1.1985
4 6-1-2022
8-31-2022

1.1921

1.1921
5 9-1-2022
11-30-2022

1.1918

1.1918
6 12-1-2022
2-28-2023

1.0774

1.0774
7 3-1-2023
5-31-2023

1.0320

1.0320
8 6-1-2023
8-31-2023

1.0260

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 9 9-1-2023
11-30-2023

1.0265

1.0265
10 12-1-2023
2-29-2024

2.8857

2.8857
11 3-1-2024
5-31-2024

1.6207

1.6207
Highest

2.8857

2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 i 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 i 220.9670 i 0.0201 i 3.7400e- 222.5835 Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 i 0.7770 7.6200e- i i 0.0966 i 0.0966 i i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1 3,896.073 i 3,896.073 i 0.1303 i 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 3
;� i i i i
Mobile •1 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 1 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 1 7,629.016 '1 i i i i i i i i 1 6 i 6 i i 1 2
Waste •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 1 514.8354 ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ----------------------*------r------ ---------------j-------*------- Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 � 29.1632 i 556.6420 � 585.8052 i 3.0183 � 0.0755 � 683.7567 Total

6.8692

9.5223

30.3407

0.0914

7.7979

0.2260

8.0240

2.0895

0.2219

2.3114
236.9712
12,294.18
12,531.15

15.7904

0.1260
12,963.47
j
j
j
j
07 19
j
51 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 10.3804 i 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 � i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 i
Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 0.7770 i 7.6200e- 0.0966 i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 i 3,896.073 3,896.073 i 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 3
Mobile •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2
Waste •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 29.1632 i 556.6420 585.8052 i 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total

6.8692

9.5223

30.3407

0.0914

7.7979

0.2260

8.0240

2.0895

0.2219

2.3114
236.9712
12,294.18
12,531.15

15.7904

0.1260
12,963.47
07 19
51 ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
Reduction

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase
Number
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Week
Num Days
Phase Description
1 ;Demolition +Demolition
19/1/2021
110/12/2021
5:
30:
+
i
2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation
110/13/2021
:11/9/2021
5:
20:
+
i
3 •Grading +Grading
111/10/2021
:1/11/2022
5:
45:
+
i
4 -Building Construction +Building Construction
11/12/2022
:12/12/2023
5:
500:
+
i
5 -Paving +Paving
112/13/2023
:1/30/2024
5:
35:
+
i
6 -Architectural Coating -Architectural Coating
1/31/2024
3/19/2024

5. 35,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition
'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001
81 •

0.73 --------------------------
�- - --------------------------
-----------
Demolition
+Excavators ; 3 8.001
158•

0.38 + _ i
_
Demolition
'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001
247•

0.40 --------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Site Preparation
'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001
247•

0.40 ----------------------------
_ i
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- -----------
Site Preparation
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001
97•

0.37 i
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
+Excavators ; 2 8.001
158•

0.38 --------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
'Graders ; 1 8.001
187•

0.41 --------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001
247•

0.40 ----------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- -----------
Grading
'Scrapers ; 21 8.001
367•

0.48 i
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Grading
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001
97•

0.37 ----------------------------
_ i
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- -----------
Building Construction
'Cranes ; 11 7.001
231,

0.29 �_ i
- - - --------------------------
-----------
Building Construction
'Forklifts ; 3 8.001
89•

0.20 + _ __ i i
_
Building Construction
'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001
_
84•

0.74 �_
_ i
- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Building Construction
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001
_
97•

0.37 + __ i
i
Building Construction
'Welders ; 1 8.001
46•

0.45 �- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Paving
+Pavers ; 2 8.001
130•

0.42 ---------------------------
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Paving
'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001
132•

0.36 i
�- - - - --------------------------
-----------
Paving
'Rollers ; 2 8.001
80•

0.38 ----------------------------
--------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- -----------
Architectural Coating
•Air Compressors 1 • 6.00•
78•

0.48 Trips and VMT

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A
6;

15.00"

0.001
458.00;

14.70:

6.90;

20.00:LD_Mix
1HDT_Mix
(HHDT
-------------
Site Preparation
7;
-----_--,

18.00:
--------i

0.001

0.00:
---------

14.70:
------------------------

6.90;

20.00;LD_Mix
----------r--------_
;HDT_Mix
;HHDT
�-
--------------- °
Grading
-------------;
8;
i------------

20.00:
--------i

0.001
,----------�-

0.00:
--------------------------

14.70:

6.90;

20.00.LD_Mix
------'
iHDT_Mix
--
EHHDT
----------------°
�-
Building Construction v
-------------=---------------''''-,
9;
i----------i-
801.00-
I --------i
143.001
,-

0.00:
---------' ---------
�-

14.70:
------------------------�----------'

6.90,

20.00;LD_Mix
iHDT_Mix
--------
;HHDT
°
�-
Paving
--------------
6;
- i------------

15.00:
--------i

0.001
,----------4-

0.00:
----------

14.70:

6.90;
-------------'

20.00;LD_Mix
iHDT_Mix
--
EHHDT
i
f
;
Architectural Coating ;
1;
160.00,

0.00,

14.70,

6.90,

20.00,LD_Mix
;HDT_Mix
HHDT

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 0.0496 , 0.0000 , 0.0496 , 7.5100e- , 0.0000 ; 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0475 , 0.4716 , 0.3235 , 5.8000e- , , 0.0233 , 0.0233 , , 0.0216 ; 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0012 , 51.0012 , 0.0144 , 0.0000 i 51.3601 004
Total

0.0475

0.4716

0.3235

5.8000e-

0.0496

0.0233

0.0729

7.5100e-

0.0216

0.0291

0.0000

51.0012

0.0144

0.0000

51.3601
004
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 1.9300e- i 0.0634 i 0.0148 1.8000e- i 3.9400e- 1.9000e- 4.1300e- i 1.0800e- 1.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 i 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 17.4869 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 9.7000e- 7.5000e- 8.5100e- 2.000Oe- 2.4700e- 2.000Oe- 2.4900e- 6.5000e- 2.000Oe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 i 2.2251 2.2251 7.000Oe- 0.0000 i 2.2267 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

2.9000e-

0.0641

0.0233

2.000Oe-

6.4100e-

2.1000e-

6.6200e-

1.7300e-

2.000Oe-

1.9300e-

0.0000

19.6816

1.2800e-

0.0000

19.7136
11 003
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 i 7.5100e- 0.0000 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003
Off -Road •i 0.0475 i 0.4716 i 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 i 0.0000 i 51.3600 004
Total

0.0475

0.4716

0.3235

5.8000e-

0.0496

0.0233

0.0729

7.5100e-

0.0216

0.0291

0.0000

51.0011

0.0144

0.0000

51.3600
004
003
1 j

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.2 Demolition - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr

I I I I I I I I I I I
Hauling •I 1.9300e- I 0.0634 I 0.0148 11.8000e- 13.9400e- I 1.9000e- 14.1300e- I 1.0800e- 11.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 I 17.4566 I 17.4566 11.2100e- I 0.0000 i 17.4869 �I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 004 I 003 I 003 I 004 003003 I I-

I I I I I I I I I I I
Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000

I I I I I I I I I- I I I
Worker •I 9.7000e- 6.7000e- � 0.0000 I 2.2251 2.2251 0.0000 i 2.2267

17.5000e- 18.5100e- 12.00OOe- 12.4700e- 12.00OOe- 12.4900e- 16.5000e- 12.00OOe- I 17.00OOe- I 'I
004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 005 � Total

2.9000e-

0.0641

0.0233

2.00OOe-

6.4100e-

2.1000e-

6.6200e-

1.7300e-

2.00OOe-

1.9300e-

0.0000

19.6816

1.2800e-

0.0000

19.7136
11 003
004
003
004
003
003
004
003
003

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr

I I I I I I I I I I I
Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I
•I I

I I I I I I I I I I I
Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7061 004 I I I I 1 I I I I
Total

0.0389

0.4050

0.2115

3.8000e-

0.1807

0.0204

0.2011

0.0993

0.0188

0.1181

0.0000

33.4357

0.0108

0.0000

33.7061
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

I I I I I I I I I I
Hauling •I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I-

I I I I I I I I I I I
Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •I 7.7000e- 1.9700e- 5.4000e- 0.0000 I 1.7801 1.7801 0.0000 i 1.7814

16.000Oe- 16.8100e- 12.000Oe- I 12.000Oe- 11.9900e- 15.2000e- 11.000Oe- I 15.000Oe- I 'I
004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 005 � Total

7.7000e-

6.000Oe-

6.8100e-

2.000Oe-

1.9700e-

2.000Oe-

1.9900e-

5.2000e-

1.000Oe-

5.4000e-

0.0000

1.7801

5.000Oe-

0.0000

1.7814
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr

I I I I I I I I I I I
Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I
•I I

I I I I I I I I I I I
Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7060 004 I I I I 1 I I I I
Total

0.0389

0.4050

0.2115

3.8000e-

0.1807

0.0204

0.2011

0.0993

0.0188

0.1181

0.0000

33.4357

0.0108

0.0000

33.7060
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - ------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 7.7000e- 6.00OOe- 6.8100e- 2.00OOe- 1.9700e- 2.00OOe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.00OOe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.7801 1.7801 5.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.7814 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

7.7000e-

6.00OOe-

6.8100e-

2.00OOe-

1.9700e-

2.00OOe-

1.9900e-

5.2000e-

1.00OOe-

5.4000e-

0.0000

1.7801

5.00OOe-

0.0000

1.7814
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005

3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3776 003
Total

0.0796

0.8816

0.5867

1.1800e-

0.1741

0.0377

0.2118

0.0693

0.0347

0.1040

0.0000
103.5405
103.5405

0.0335

0.0000
104.3776
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2021
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 4.1600e- 3.000Oe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.000Oe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 i 3.7607 i i i i i
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i
Total

1.6400e-

1.2700e-

0.0144

4.000Oe-

4.1600e-

3.000Oe-

4.2000e-

1.1100e-

3.000Oe-

1.1400e-

0.0000

3.7579

1.1000e-

0.0000

3.7607
11 003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3775 003
Total

0.0796

0.8816

0.5867

1.1800e-

0.1741

0.0377

0.2118

0.0693

0.0347

0.1040

0.0000
103.5403
103.5403

0.0335

0.0000
104.3775
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2021
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 4.1600e- 3.00OOe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.00OOe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 i 3.7607 i i i i i
003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i
Total

1.6400e-

1.2700e-

0.0144

4.00OOe-

4.1600e-

3.00OOe-

4.2000e-

1.1100e-

3.00OOe-

1.1400e-

0.0000

3.7579

1.1000e-

0.0000

3.7607
11 003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004

3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total

0.0127

0.1360

0.1017

2.2000e-

0.0807

5.7200e-

0.0865

0.0180

5.2600e-

0.0233

0.0000

19.0871

6.1700e-

0.0000

19.2414
004
003
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6684 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005
Total

2.8000e-

2.1000e-

2.4400e-

1.0000e-

7.7000e-

1.000Oe-

7.7000e-

2.000Oe-

1.000Oe-

2.1000e-

0.0000

0.6679

2.000Oe-

0.0000

0.6684
11 004
004
003
005
004
005
004
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total

0.0127

0.1360

0.1017

2.2000e-

0.0807

5.7200e-

0.0865

0.0180

5.2600e-

0.0233

0.0000

19.0871

6.1700e-

0.0000

19.2414
004
003
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.4 Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 2.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.6684 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005
Total

2.8000e-

2.1000e-

2.4400e-

1.00OOe-

7.7000e-

1.00OOe-

7.7000e-

2.00OOe-

1.00OOe-

2.1000e-

0.0000

0.6679

2.00OOe-

0.0000

0.6684
11 004
004
003
005
004
005
004
004
005
004
005

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 2.0700 i 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 i i 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1324 i 293.1324 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8881 003
Total

0.2158

1.9754

2.0700

3.4100e-

0.1023

0.0963

0.0000
293.1324
293.1324

0.0702

0.0000
294.8881
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------
Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 i 967.4773 003 003
Total

0.4616

2.0027

3.9885

0.0152

1.2243

0.0121

1.2363

0.3278

0.0112
1,408.795
1,408.795

0.0530

0.0000
1,410.120
[777000
2 2
8 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 i 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8877 003
Total

0.2158

1.9754

2.0700

3.4100e-

0.1023

0.0963

0.0000
293.1321
293.1321

0.0702

0.0000
294.8877
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ----------------
Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 i 967.4773 003 003
Total

0.4616

2.0027

3.9885

0.0152

1.2243

0.0121

1.2363

0.3278

0.0112
1,408.795
1,408.795

0.0530

0.0000
1,410.120
[777000
2 2
8 3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9814 003j
Total

0.1942

1.7765

2.0061

3.3300e-

0.0864

0.0813

0.0000
286.2789
286.2789

0.0681

0.0000
287.9814
003
j

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 i 909.9291 003 003
Total

0.4135

1.5218

3.5707

0.0144

1.1953

9.8700e-

1.2051

0.3200

9.1400e-
1,327.336

0.0462

0.0000
1,328.491
j
003
j
j
003
j
[-377000
9 [1,327.336
9 j
6 Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9811 i i i i i • i i i i
003j
Total

0.1942

1.7765

2.0061

3.3300e-

0.0864

0.0813

0.0000
286.2785
286.2785

0.0681

0.0000
287.9811
003
j

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i
Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 i 909.9291 003 003
Total

0.4135

1.5218

3.5707

0.0144

1.1953

9.8700e-

1.2051

0.3200

9.1400e-
1,327.336

0.0462

0.0000
1,328.491
j
003
j
j
003
j
[-377000
9 [1,327.336
9 j
6 3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i
•� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

6.7100e-

0.0663

0.0948

1.5000e-

3.3200e-

3.0500e-

0.0000

13.0175

4.2100e-

0.0000
003
004
003
003
003
003
003
1 m

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 --------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ ----�-------------'--------------� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.000Oe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.8968 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

3.7000e-

2.7000e-

3.1200e-

1.0000e-

1.0700e-

1.000Oe-

1.0800e-

2.8000e-

1.000Oe-

2.9000e-

0.0000

0.8963

2.000Oe-

0.0000

0.8968
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i
•� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

6.7100e-

0.0663

0.0948

1.5000e-

3.3200e-

3.0500e-

0.0000

13.0175

4.2100e-

0.0000
003
004
003
003
003
003
003
1 m

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ----------------------- ---------------------'------------------------ --+ ----� -------------'----00- ----00 1 000
Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.00OOe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.8968 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

3.7000e-

2.7000e-

3.1200e-

1.00OOe-

1.0700e-

1.00OOe-

1.0800e-

2.8000e-

1.00OOe-

2.9000e-

0.0000

0.8963

2.00OOe-

0.0000

0.8968
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005

3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0109 i 0.1048 0.1609 i 2.5000e- i i 5.1500e- i 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- i 0.0000 i 22.2073 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

0.0109

0.1048

0.1609

2.5000e-

5.1500e-

4.7400e-

0.0000

22.0292

7.1200e-

0.0000

22.2073
11 004
003
003
003
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.000Oe- 1.8100e- 1.000Oe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.000Oe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.4706 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

5.9000e-

4.1000e-

4.9200e-

2.000Oe-

1.8100e-

1.000Oe-

1.8200e-

4.8000e-

1.000Oe-

4.9000e-

0.0000

1.4697

4.000Oe-

0.0000

1.4706
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
I I
PM2.5
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 i 22.2073 i i i
•� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total

0.0109

0.1048

0.1609

2.5000e-

5.1500e-

4.7400e-

0.0000

22.0292

7.1200e-

0.0000
11 004
003
003
003
003
003
m

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.6 Paving - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - ------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.00OOe- 1.8100e- 1.00OOe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.00OOe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.4706 i i i i i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005
Total

5.9000e-

4.1000e-

4.9200e-

2.00OOe-

1.8100e-

1.00OOe-

1.8200e-

4.8000e-

1.00OOe-

4.9000e-

0.0000

1.4697

4.00OOe-

0.0000

1.4706
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i
003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i
Total

4.1404

0.0213

0.0317

5.00OOe-

1.0700e-

0.0000

4.4682

2.5000e-

0.0000

4.4745
005
003
003
003
003
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ��--------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ - -------------'--.--�-------T Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 '� I
'� •
I
•
Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 i 24.9558 i i i i � i
003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i
Total

0.0101

6.9900e-

0.0835

2.8000e-

0.0307

2.3000e-

0.0309

8.1500e-

2.2000e-

8.3700e-

0.0000

24.9407

6.1007

0.0000

24.9558
003
004
004
003
004
003
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i
003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i
Total

4.1404

0.0213

0.0317

5.000Oe-

1.0700e-

0.0000

4.4682

2.5000e-

0.0000

4.4745
005
003
003
003
003
004

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I
I
Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 i 24.9558 i i i i � i
003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i
Total

0.0101

6.9900e-

0.0835

2.8000e-

0.0307

2.3000e-

0.0309

8.1500e-

2.2000e-

8.3700e-

0.0000

24.9407

6.1007

0.0000

24.9558
003
004
004
003
004
003
004

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG
I NOx
I CO
I S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 i 7.7979 i 0.0580

7.8559
i 2.0895
i 0.0539

2.1434

0.0000 i 7,620.498 � 7,620.498 � 0.3407 i 0.0000
i 7,629.016
6 i 6 i i
i 2
Unmitigated

1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580

7.8559

2.0895

0.0539

2.1434

0.0000 7,620.498 • 7,620.498 • 0.3407 - 0.0000
• 7,629.016
6 6
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................-----------
General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r -
High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 ..

Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95
8,164.43
8,057.31
20,552,452
20,552,452

4.3 Trip Type Information

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose %
I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70

5.90 8.70

40.20 19.20

40.60 86
11 3
Apartments Mid Rise 14.70

5.90 8.70
Y 40.20
:
1 19.20

40.60 86
11 3
........................------------------__
__ __
?
_
T
_
--------
----
-------------
General Office Building 16.60

8.40 6.90

33.00 48.00

19.00 77
; 19
4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - -
High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60
- - - - - - - - -

8.40 T - - - - - - - - - .

6.90 - - - - - - - -

8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T
1 72.50
- - - - - - - - - - - -

19.00 - - - - - - - - -
37 - - - - - - - - - -
20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
43 .......:......r........�------------------
--
...
?
r--------------....

T..
-------- .r..
--------
---- r...
-------------
Hotel 16.60

8.40 6.90

19.40 61.60

19.00 ;
58 ; 38 ;
4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - -
Quality Restaurant 16.60
- - - - - - - - -

8.40 T - - - - - - - - - .

6.90 - - - - - - - -

12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T
1 69.00
- - - - - - - - - - - -

19.00 - - - - - - - - -
38 - - - - - - - - - -
18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60

8.40 6.90

16.30 64.70

19.00 54
35 11

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA
I LDT1
I LDT2
I MDV
LHD1
LHD2
MHD
HHD
OBUS
UBUS
MCY
SBUS
MH
Apartments Low Rise

0.543088} 0.044216;

0.209971;

0.116369;

0.014033;

0.006332;

0.021166;

0.033577;

0.002613;

0.001817;

0.005285;

0.0007121

0.000821
r
Apartments Mid Rise

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.0140331

0.0063321

0.0211661

0.0335771

0.0026131

0.0018171

0.0052851

0.000712.

0.000821
r
General Office Building

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.0140331

0.0063321

0.0211661

0.0335771

0.0026131

0.0018171

0.0052851

0.000712:

0.000821
r
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down

0.5430881 0.044216:

0.209971:

0.116369:

0.014033:

0.006332:

0.021166:

0.033577:

0.002613:

0.001817:

0.005285:

0.000712:

0.000821
Restaurant)
....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285
Hotel

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.014033,

0.006332

0.021166

0.033577

0.000712

0.000821
-----------------------_-----------------------
Quality Restaurant

0.5430881 0.0442161

0.2099711

0.1163691

0.0140331

0.0063321

0.0211661

0.0335771

0.0026131

0.0018171

0.0052851

0.000712.

0.000821
Regional Shopping Center

0.543088. 0.044216'

0.209971'

0.116369'

0.014033'

0.006332'

0.021166'

0.033577'

0.002613'

0.001817'

0.005285'

0.000712'

0.000821

5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
I Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity •1
I I 1
I 1 I
I I
1 I 0.0000
I I
I 0.0000 I
I
I 0.0000
� 0.0000
� 0.0000
I I
12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037
I
1 0.0215
i 2,521.635
Mitigated
5 1 5 1
1 1 6
•1 I I 1 I 1 1
I
1 •
1 1 I
1 Electricity •1
I I I
I 1 I
I 1
1 I 0.0000
1 I
1 0.0000 I
I
I 0.0000

0.0000
� 0.0000
1 I
12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037
I
1 0.0215
2,521.635
Unmitigated
5 1 5 1
I
1 6
•1 I I 1 I 1 1
I
1 •
I 1 1 I
1 NaturalGas

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265

0.0254
1,391.647
Miti
003
7 7
8gated
•
I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 •
1 1 I
1 NaturalGas

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
- 0.0966

0.0966 -

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426 - 1,383.426 - 0.0265
- 0.0254
1,391.647
Unmitigated
003
7 7
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise
1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 ;
1 1
r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T
Apartments Mid
i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise
+007 ; 1 I I 003
_
1 ; 1
r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T
General Office
Building
i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1
'1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit

8.30736e •1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant)
1 +006 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1
-----------
Hotel
------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�-------�-------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_

1.74095e 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 __
" '-" "I
Quality
1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------. 1 �-------�-------�-------' r------71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 1 99.0993 Restaurant
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1
1 , I I I 1
I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_
Regional
Shopping Centers
i 91840 .1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total

0.1398

1.2312

0.7770

7.6200e-

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426
1,383.426

0.0265

0.0254
1,391.647
003
8 8
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
I Total
I
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise
1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 004 1 004 1 1 ; 1
r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T
Apartments Mid
i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise
+007 ; 1 I I 003
_
1 ; 1
r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T
General Office
Building
i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1
'1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit

8.30736e .1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant)
1 +006 i 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1
-----------
Hotel
------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�------- -------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , �____--'I-------1 1 1 -------

1.74095e •1 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -""'-""i
Quality
'1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------��1 �-------�-------�-------1 r-------------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ____--'I-------1 1 1 T_----- 71 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 99.0993 Restaurant
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1
1 , I I I 1
I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_
Regional
Shopping Centers
i 91840 •1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 ; 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total

0.1398

1.2312

0.7770

7.6200e-

0.0966

0.0000
1,383.426
1,383.426

0.0265

0.0254
1,391.647
003
8 8
j
j
8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978
Rise
003 004 i
--�------it------
Apartments Mid
•---------------- *-------

3.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
Rise
+006 9 i i i 9
General Office
-j--------j-------
i 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165
Building
003 003
High Turnover (Sit
-j- - - - - --- - - - - - -

1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135
Down Restaurant)
i +006 003
--
Hotel
-----•--------------- -ii-------
i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672
003 003
-
Quality
•�- - - - - --- - - - - --
------ii-------
353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141
Restaurant
;1 i 003 i 004
Regional
756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- T 241.7395
Shopping Center
003 i 003
Total
2,512.646

0.1037

0.0215
2:521.635
5 6

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low
106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978
Rise
003 004 i
Apartments Mid
• ----------------

1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135
Down Restaurant)
i +006 003
---r---
Hotel
------- *-------
---ii•---------------
i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672
003 003
---
Quality
•�- - - - - ---
r------ii------- *-------
353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141
Restaurant
;1 003 i 004
Regional
--------------
756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- 241.7395
Shopping Center
003 i 003
Total
2,512.646�71037

0.0215
2,521.635
5 6

6.0 Area Detail

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 5.1437
i 0.2950 � 10.3804 1.6700e-

0.0714
i 0.0714
i i 0.0714

0.0714

0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201
� 3.7400e- 1 222.5835
003
003
Unmitigated 5.1437

0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
- 0.0714
- 0.0714

0.0714

0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 - 0.0201

3.7400e- 222.5835
003
003

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.4137 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating
%
----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------*------- Consumer �� 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products
Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- i 0.0143 i 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- i 205.3295 •� 003 003 003 i
.

Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 i 17.2540 i
004
Total

5.1437

0.2950

10.3804

1.6600e-

0.0714

0.0000
220.9670
220.9670

0.0201

3.7400e-
222.5835
003
003

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
S02
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.4137 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating
Consumer •i 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products
Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 205.3295 003 003 003 i
Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 i 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 004
Total

5.1437

0.2950

10.3804

1.6600e-

0.0714

0.0000
220.9670
220.9670

0.0201

3.7400e-
222.5835
11 003
003

7.0 Water Detail

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated •1 585.8052 i 3.0183 i 0.0755
i 683.7567
- - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4------------------------------- - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755
683.7567

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low

1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471
Rise

1.02688 ;i i 003
'-------- -------- -------
Apartments Mid
1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
Rise

40.0485 ;
-- - - - --- - - - - - -
General Office
1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- i 61.6019
Building

4.90201 ;i i 003
-
- - - - - - ------- -j------- --------- - - - - - - -
High Turnover (Sit

10.9272 / •i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 62.8482
Down Restaurant)
i 0.697482 ;i i 003
' -------- -------
Hotel
i 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- i 7.5079

0.140927 'i 003
-- - - - - --- - - - - - -
Quality

2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663
Restaurant
i 0.154996 ;i i 003
----------
---------------
Regional

4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490
Shopping Center

2.54236 ;i i 003
Total
585.8052
j 3.0183
j 0.0755
683.7567

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low

1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471
Rise

1.02688 ;i i 003
'-------- -------- -------
Apartments Mid
1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
Rise

40.0485 ;
-- - - - --- - - - - - -
General Office
1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- i 61.6019
Building

4.90201 ;i 003
--r-
----- ------- -j--------------- * - - - - - - -
High Turnover (Sit

10.9272 / •i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 62.8482
Down Restaurant)
i 0.697482 ;i i 003
' -------- -------
Hotel
i 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- i 7.5079

0.140927 'i 003
-- - - - - --- - - - - - -
Quality

2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663
Restaurant
i 0.154996 ;i i 003
----------
---------------
Regional

4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490
Shopping Center

2.54236 ;i i 003
Total
585.8052
j 3.0183
j 0.0755
683.7567

8.0 Waste Detail

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual CategoryNear
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 207.8079
i 12.2811 i 0.0000
1 514.8354
- - - - - - - - - - - % --------------+------------------------------ - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 207.8079

12.2811 0.0000
514.8354

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low

11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Rise
•�
i
• '-------'-------
Apartments Mid
i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513
Rise
•�
--------
i
-------- ------- '-------
GeneralOffice
i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464
Building
i •�
-
------ �i------- '------- '------- *-------
High Turnover (Sit
428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Down Restaurant)1
•�
• '-------'-------
Hotel
i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694
__
i i
Quality

7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Restaurant
i •�
• -------- -------

58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Shopping Center
i •�
Total
207.8079

12.2811

0.0000
514.8354

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low

11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Rise
•�
i
• '-------'-------
Apartments Mid
i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513
Rise
•�
--------
i
-------- ------- '-------
GeneralOffice
i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464
Building
i •�
-
------ �i------- '------- '------- *-------
High Turnover (Sit
428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Down Restaurant)1
•�
'-------'-------
Hotel
i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694
__
i i
Quality

7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Restaurant
i •�
• - ' - - - - - - -'- - - - - - -
Regional

58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Shopping Center
i •�
Total
207.8079

12.2811

0.0000
514.8354

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number

11.0 Vegetation

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer

1.0 Project Characteristics

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
General Office Building

45.00 +
1000sgft
; 1.03
45,000.00
i 0
----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00
High
----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0
+
-----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 +
---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0
------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 +
---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0
_
--- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 +
----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72
---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments
artments Mid Rise 975.00 +
----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789
------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center

56.00 1000sgft

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.