Agenda packet — Thousand Oaks City Council, August 30, 2022 (part 3 of 6)

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-20
pumps to shut off and requiring manual removal of sand to ensure the coastal communities do not flood. With sea level rise, the risk increases. While not currently afflicted with the propensity for sand to clog its outlet, San Nicholas Pump Station is vulnerable to failure as sea level rises.

The pumps in each facility are over 40 years old and do not have on site backup generators, making them vulnerable to power failures, which cause alarms to sound signaling the need for immediate emergency response. All three facilities need constant repair due to corrosive salt air and water. Upgrades are needed, but more land is required for truly effective solutions, and adjacent land is occupied by high value coastal residences. • Ormand Lagoon Coastal Estuary Vulnerable to Sea Level Rise—Ormond Lagoon is a coastal estuary open to the ocean only during rain events and for a variable period thereafter depending on time between rain events, tides, etc. Sea level rise may reduce the ability of storm runoff from Ormond Lagoon Waterway and Tšumaš Creek to breach the lagoon and flow into the Pacific Ocean. Without a Beach Elevation Management Plan, the following are vulnerable to flooding from storm water backed up in the lagoon: the adjacent Oxnard Wastewater Treatment Plant and Advanced Water Purification Facility, the New-Indy recycled containerboard mill, the Halaco Superfund Site, local residences and roads. Restoration of the Ormond Wetlands complex may help reduce flood potential.
• Homeless Population—The size and distribution of the homeless population in the unincorporated area is not easily quantified, but has been increasing in recent years and exacerbates hazard risks and mitigation costs. During a January 2020 point-in-time survey coordinated by the County Executive Office, 128 homeless individuals were counted as residing within the unincorporated County area. Many homeless individuals within the unincorporated area inhabit encampments within the Ventura and Santa Clara river bottoms, where both wildfires and flooding risks are regular concerns. Unsheltered living locations have negative impacts on watershed viability and resilience in addition to posing risks to the broader community. The presence of unauthorized habitation within the watersheds increases wildfire risks (e.g., accidental starts from cooking/warmth fires and arson) as well as the cost of hazard mitigation actions (e.g., brush clearance for wildfire hazard abatement and trash and debris removal efforts prior to winter storm season). Communication barriers, fear of government officials and law enforcement, substance abuse issues, and mental health issues can complicate public outreach and hazard awareness efforts to homeless individuals, and confound accurate assessments of hazard risk and disaster damage. • Importance of Agriculture and Potential for Undervaluation of Drought and Ag/Biological Risks—Agriculture, in the forms of ranching and farming, has been a keystone of Ventura County’s economy since its inception. With fertile soils and a mild climate, Ventura remains one of the leading counties for agricultural production in the state. In addition to a variety of row crops and nursery products, the county is one of the top producers of citrus, avocados, and strawberries in the nation. Much of the cultivated land lies within the unincorporated County areas of the Oxnard Plain and Santa Clara River Valley. In addition to generating direct on-farm employment and revenue, agricultural production supports a wide range of other businesses, including packinghouses, equipment dealers, chemical applicators, pest-control firms, labor contractors, fertilizer and other supply dealers, trucking firms, fuel distributors, and repair and manufacturing facilities. Altogether, farming and farm-dependent businesses provide an estimated 43,000 jobs in Ventura County, more than any other sector of the economy except services. Agriculture and agriculture-related businesses account for about 4.4 percent of overall economic activity in Ventura County, generating $2.1 billion in revenue and $76 million in indirect business taxes annually. One in 10 county residents relies to some degree on income derived from farming. However, drought and agricultural/biological hazards (e.g., invasive crop Item No.7D

1. Ventura County (Unincorporated Area)
1-21
pests and disease) do not lend themselves to evaluation using FEMA’s traditional risk analysis tools (e.g. property, structural damage estimates, loss of life, critical infrastructure inventories), which results in underestimation of the disaster impacts/costs that these hazards can have on the local environment, economy, and area communities.
• Unauthorized Immigrants—Ventura County’s farm bureau estimates there are about 36,000 immigrant workers in the county, many of them undocumented. Unauthorized immigrants may be disproportionately affected by disasters (e.g., wildfires, flooding, pandemics), particularly those that impact agricultural operations in the unincorporated county areas where many work as farm laborers. Language/ communication barriers and fear of government and law enforcement personnel can complicate public outreach and education efforts to these individuals.

Mitigation actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

1.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 1-14 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Table 1-14. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to
Plan Update
Action Item from Previous Plan Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check
if Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 11—Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.
 VUC-8
Comment: This is an ongoing effort to be developed over the next year.

OA 19—Maintain vegetation management program that provides vegetation management services to elderly, disabled, or low-income property owners who lack the resources to remove flammable vegetation from around their homes.  VUC-9
Comment: This is an ongoing program and will be carried over to the plan update.

OA 21—Maintain hazards fuel treatment program for areas that have been identified with overgrown/dead brush/trees to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program.
 VUC-10
Comment: This is an ongoing program and will be carried over to the plan update.

UVC 1—Continue to participate in the National Weather Service’s (NWS) StormReady Program.
 VUC-11
Comment: Ventura County continues to participate in TsunamiReady and StormReady. NWS confirmed that Ventura County was last renewed for both SR and TR on 2/25/2019. The next renewal will be due on 3/19/2022.

UVC 2—Develop a plan to identify funding to replace/relocate the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center (EOC).
 VUC-12
Comment: This item was not completed/pursued during the last update cycle (Thomas & Woolsey fire events, OES staffing changes, and COVID impacted planning and development of many items over the last several years) but continues to be a project of interest that will be carried over to the plan update.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-22
Removed;
Carried Over to
Plan Update
Action Item from Previous Plan Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check
if Yes
Action # in
Update
UVC 3—Update Seismic Standards for Communications (Cell Towers) Facilities (Building Code).
 VUC-13
Comment: This will be done through the Ventura County Building Code VCBC 2019 UVC 4—Reinforce and maintain County roads, bridges, ditches and culverts from flooding through various flood proofing measures.
 VUC-17
Comment: Ventura County Public Works Agency—Roads and Transportation Department (VCPWA-RT) is responsible for the operation and maintenance of County roads, bridges, ditches, and culverts in the unincorporated areas of Ventura County. VCPWA- RT conducts annual ditch cleaning and culvert cleaning before winter storm season to maintain the capacity of ditches and proper drainage flow to mitigate roadway flooding in rural areas of the county. In addition to the annual cleaning of ditches and culverts, the VCPWA-RT is actively working to rehabilitate Bridge Road Bridge (#442) which is currently in design and environmental permitting phase and is expected to be completed in 2023. Replacement of Catalina Drive Bridge (#384) was completed in May 2020 and replacement of Casitas Vista Road Bridge (#327) was completed in September 2020. Mupu Road Bridge and the Wheeler Canyon Road Bridge improvements projects were completed in 2016-2017. The VCPWA-RT is developing a Bridge Management Program to maintain County bridges. The program will identify and prioritize VCPWA- RT’s 158 bridge structures which include 81 bridges on the National Bridge Inventory and 77 other structures. This program will identify budget needs, and schedules for preventive maintenance as well as budget for required rehabilitation or replacement of VCPWA-RT maintained bridges for short and long- term planning needs. The Bridge Management Program is
expected to be completed in calendar year 2021. In 2020-2021, VCPWA-WP continued to clean flood control channels and catch basins to prepare for winter storm seasons. VCPWA-WP also secured Proposition 1 grant funding for the Santa Ana Bridge and Camino Cielo Bridge replacement projects which are managed by VCPWA-RT (both are components of the MDERP). The design of Camino Cielo Bridge is progressing towards 30% millstone. For the Santa Ana Bridge project, a construction contract was awarded in March 2021 with an estimated completion date of December 2022.

1.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 1-15 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 1-16 identifies the priority for each action. Table 1-17 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Table 1-15. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action VUC-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11,
16 Ventura
County
NA High HMGP, PDM, FMA Short-term
Item No.7D

1. Ventura County (Unincorporated Area)
1-23
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action VUC-2—Integrate the Hazard Mitigation Plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including the 2040 General Plan, Non-Coastal Zoning Ordinance, and Local Coastal Program.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami, Drought, Agricultural/Biological
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10,
11, 12, 15, 17, 18,
19 Ventura
County
Resource
Management
Agency,
Ventura
County
Sheriff’s OES,
Ventura
County Public
Works Agency
NA Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action VUC-3—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami, Drought, Agricultural/Biological
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
19 Ventura
County
Agencies
NA Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term
Action VUC-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements to:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Severe Storms, Sea Level Rise, Dam Failure New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10,
11, 13, 14, 15, 17,
19 County Public
Works
Building and Safety Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing Action VUC-5—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including but not limited to the following:
• Implementation of 2040 General Plan programs including a Cool Roof Ordinance and Cool Pavement Standards, Performance-Based Building Code for Green Building, Groundwater Basins Resilience Program, Sea Level Impacts Monitoring Program, and Wildfire Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping Program.
• Develop programs to increase energy efficiency of new buildings above state-required design requirements Hazards Mitigated: Sea Level Rise, Flooding, Drought, Wildfire, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Agricultural/Biological New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
18, 19
Ventura
County
NA Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
and Short-
term
Action VUC-6—Purchase and install permanent generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power.

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-24
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action VUC-7—Purchase and install mobile generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Tsunami, Wildfire Existing 2, 6 Ventura
County
NA High FEMA HMA (BRIC and
HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Short-term
Action VUC-8—Develop and implement plans to increase building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of their building’s structural and nonstructural elements. (formerly 2015 Action OA-11) Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
Exitsting 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 16, 17 Ventura
County
Building and
Safety
NA Medium Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
and Short-
term
Action VUC-9—Maintain new vegetation management program that provides vegetation management services to elderly, disabled, or low-income property owners who lack the resources to remove flammable vegetation from around their homes. (formerly 2015 Action OA- 19) (Coordinates with Ventura County Fire Protection District Action VFP-12) Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 13,
14, 15, 19
VCFPD Ventura County Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMAP
and HMGP), Staff Time,
General Funds
Ongoing
Action VUC-10—Maintain wildfire hazard fuel reduction program for areas that have been identified with overgrown or dead brush, trees and weeds to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program. (formerly 2015 Action OA-21) (Coordinates with Ventura County Fire Protection District Action VFP-6) Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10,
11, 13, 14, 15, 18,
19 VCFPD

CAL FIRE & USDA Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMAP
and HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Ongoing
Action VUC-11—Continue to participate in the National Weather Service’s (NWS) StormReady and TsunamiReady Programs. (formerly 2015 Action UVC-1) (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-16) Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Flooding, Dam Failure, Landslide, Sea Level Rise New & Existing 1, 2, 7, 8, 17 Ventura
County Public
Works
Ventura County Sheriff’s
OES
Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action VUC-12—Develop a plan to identify funding to replace/relocate the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center (EOC). (formerly 2015 Action UVC-2)
Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 6, 7, 8 Ventura
County
Sheriff’s OES
NA High Staff Time, General Funds Long-term
Action VUC-13—Update Seismic Standards for Communications (Cell Towers) Facilities (Building Code).

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 11 Ventura
County
Building and
Safety
NA High HMGP, PDM, FMA Short-term
Action VUC-14—Develop a countywide Evacuation Route Plan to identify and evaluate evacuation routes for wildfires and other hazards.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide New & Existing 7, 8, 17, 19 Ventura
County OES

VCFPD High Staff Time, General
Funds, Fire Safe Council
Grant
Short-term
Item No.7D

1. Ventura County (Unincorporated Area)
1-25
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action VUC-15—Implement a Post Disaster Critical Facilities Risk Impact Assessment Program designed to capture and geo-reference perishable data after significant events (e.g., preliminary damage estimates, damage photos, event mapping, etc.) in support of future hazard mitigation efforts including the implementation and maintenance of the HMP. Leverage applications (Maintstar v15, ArcGIS Online) to capture information related to VCPWA-RT, W&S, and WP critical facility asset impacts, and establish a centralized location to document and archive critical facilities geospatial data related to disaster events which will facilitate the development and optimize the pursuit of grant funding for future hazard mitigation projects. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-3) Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 16, 17,
18, 19
VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments, Cities,
Special-Purpose Districts,
and NGOs.

Low WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC) and County
General Funds, as
required
Short Term
Action VUC-16—Improve public awareness and community response to flood event emergencies by upgrading and modernizing the Flood Warning System (FWS) optimized to leverage multi-social media venues. Expand the public outreach of the FWS through targeted marketing based on web-site analytics and develop multiple language interfaces to better reflect the linguistic and cultural diversity found in Ventura County communities. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-4) Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 12, 17,
18, 19

VCPWA-WP DWR, NOAA, VCSOES,
Ventura County
Departments, Cities,
Special-Purpose Districts,
community and tribal
leaders, community
councils, and NGOs
Medium WP Structural Revenues
augmented by DWR and
FEMA Grants (BRIC and
HMGP) and County
General Funds, as
required
Short Term
Action VUC-17—Prioritize efforts to upgrade County bridges, culverts, dams, debris and detention basins, flood conveyance channel and pipeline infrastructure, pump stations, roads, water and wastewater community infrastructure, and other critical facilities required to provide adequate flood-proofing protection and enhance the resiliency of vital community lifelines in Ventura County. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-5)
Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire New & Existing 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10,
11, 13, 16, 18, 19
VCPWA
Departments
Ventura County
Departments, Cities,
Special-Purpose Districts
High WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC, HMGP)
DWR, VCTC, Caltrans and
County General Funds, as
required
Long-term
Action VUC-18—Complete project feasibility analyses, design engineering and CEQA work for the Ventura River Levee (VR-2) in the unincorporated community of Casitas Springs, and the Live Oak Acres Levee near the unincorporated community of Oak View required to evidence local compliance with Federal Levee Certification Regulations (44 CFR 65.10) (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-6) Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10,
11, 13, 16, 18, 19
VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments and Cities of
Camarillo, Oxnard, and San
Buenaventura
High WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC and HMGP)
DWR-LLAP Grants
USACE, and County
General Funds, as
required
Long Term
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-26
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action VUC-19—Strengthen the unincorporated area’s participation in the NFIP by maintaining a CRS Class 5 Rating; and pursue a renewed emphasis on the planning and implementation of flood mitigation projects for repetitive loss properties eligible for grant funding under FEMA’s Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program with the goal of reducing the number of repetitive loss properties in Ventura County. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-7) Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 16, 18,
19 VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments, DWR, FEMA
High WP Structural Revenues
augmented by Grants
(FMA, BRIC, HMGP) and
County General Funds, as
required
Ongoing
Action VUC-20—Partner with the Nature Conservancy, Santa Clara River Conservancy, Ojai Valley Land Conservancy, and other NGOs in cooperative efforts to acquire floodplain properties, carry out restoration projects, and enhance resiliency to natural disasters with green design elements included in hazard mitigation projects where feasible. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-8) Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Drought, Flooding, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Tsunami, and Wildfire New & Existing 1, 2, 5, 9, 10, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18
VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments, TNC, SCRC,
OVLC, DWR, CDFW, State
Coastal Conservancy
High WP Structural Revenues
augmented by Grants
(FMA, BRIC, HMGP,
DWR, SCC, etc.) and
County General Funds, as
required
Ongoing
Action VUC-21—Advance planning, feasibility analyses, preliminary design, and ultimate construction of multi-benefit stormwater capture projects through a regionally collaborative approach; as well as pursue strategies to maximize stormwater as a resource (enhance recycled water, stormwater capture and sanitary system diversion, and groundwater recharge) where possible in infrastructure planning and implementation of WP stormwater capital projects. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-9) Hazards Mitigated: Drought, Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather New 1, 2, 9, 10, 11, 12,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
19 VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments, SWRCB,
LARWQCB, DWR, SGMAs,
NGOs and Private
Landowners
High WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC & HMGP)

DWR, IRWM, LARWQB,
SWRCB) and County
General Funds, as
required
Ongoing
Action VUC-22—Coordinate with FEMA Region IX to proactively address flood plain management and flood risk mapping issues that could adversely impact local hazard mitigation project planning and implementation efforts which may arise from updates to the Countywide DFIRMs, Community Assistance Visits, and/or other risk mapping initiatives. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-10) Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 16, 17, 18,
19 VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments, DWR, FEMA,
Cities, NGOs, and Private
Landowners
Medium WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC & HMGP)
DWR, and County General
Funds, as required
Ongoing
Action VUC-23—Work closely with CA Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD), County Sheriff Office of Emergency Services (OES), and other Federal, State, and local agencies to update and refine the Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) for the state size dams owned by the County. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-11)
Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Flooding, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather New & Existing 1, 2,4, 7,8,
12, 17, 18
VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments, FEMA, DWR,
Cities, NGOs, and Private
Landowners
Medium WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC), DWR, and
County General Funds, as
required
Short-Term
Item No.7D

1. Ventura County (Unincorporated Area)
1-27
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action VUC-24—Complete project feasibility analyses, design engineering, CEQA, and implementation of the removal of Matilija Dam, reconstruction of the Camino Cielo Bridge crossing, and work with the Casitas Municipal Water District to reconstruct the Robles Diversion, as well as complete the construction of flood protection projects in the unincorporated community of Meiners Oaks in compliance with DSOD requirements. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-12) Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Storms, Severe Weather New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
17, 18, 19
VCPWA-WP Ventura County
Departments, Casitas
Municipal Water District,
Bureau of Reclamation,
Caltrans, CDFW, DSOD,

DWR, FEMA, USACE,
NGOs
High WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC & HMGP)

CDFW, DWR, NFWF,
NRCS, SCC, WCB, and
NGO’s and County and
Casitas General Funds, as
required
Long-Term
Action VUC-25—Collaborate with the City of Oxnard, Nature Conservancy, and State Coastal Conservancy to advance planning, design, and implementation of the Ormond Beach Restoration and Access Plan (OBRAP), particularly those components alleviating flooding along the Ormond Lagoon Waterway and creating public access along tšumaš Creek. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-13 and supports the City of Oxnard Action OXN-12)
Hazards Mitigated: Drought, Flooding, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, 13,
14, 15, 17, 18, 19
City of Oxnard VCPWA-WP High City Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC),
CDFG
Ongoing
Action VUC-26—Coordinate efforts to plan, develop, and ultimately construct multi-benefit, flood resiliency and other risk hazard mitigation projects with the Watershed Coalition of Ventura County (OBRAP) 3-Watershed Councils, its Disadvantaged Community Committee, and nonprofit partners by increasing outreach and engagement with disadvantaged and socially vulnerable communities and tribal groups to better understand their unique community-lifeline vulnerabilities, facilitate the development of flood hazard mitigation multi- benefit projects, and align and leverage advocacy efforts to optimize grant funding opportunities. (Coordinates with Action VCPWA-WP-14)
Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, & 19
VCPWA-WP County of Ventura
Departments, Cities,
Special-Purpose Districts,
community and tribal
leaders, community
councils, WCVC, and
NGOs
Medium WP Structural Revenues
augmented by FEMA
Grants (BRIC & HMGP)
DWR, IRWM, and City and
County General Funds as
required
Ongoing
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-28
Table 1-16. Mitigation Action Priority
Action
#
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded Under
Existing Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
VUC-1 7 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
VUC-2 12 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
VUC-3 17 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
VUC-4 12 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
VUC-5 19 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Medium
VUC-6 3 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
VUC-7 2 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
VUC-8 7 Low Medium No No Yes Low Low
VUC-9 9 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
VUC-10 12 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
VUC-11 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
VUC-12 3 Medium High No No No Low Low
VUC-13 5 Medium High No Yes No Low Medium
VUC-14 4 Medium High No Yes No Low Medium
VUC-15 14 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes-only at a level that is “Minimally Necessary to Comply”
Medium Medium
VUC-16 8 Medium Medium Yes Yes Yes-only at a level that is “Minimally Necessary to Comply”
Medium Medium
VUC-17 12 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
VUC-18 12 Medium High Yes Yes No High High
VUC-19 12 Medium High Yes Yes Maintaining Class 5-CRS Rating: Yes.

Reducing Severe Repetitive Loss
Property Exposure: No
Low Medium
VUC-20 13 High High Yes Yes

Establishing Partnerships with NGOs:

Yes
Acquiring flood plain properties,
carrying out restoration projects, and
including green design elements: No
Low Medium
VUC-21 12 High High Yes Yes Advance planning and feasibility analysis: Yes Perform Final Design and
Construction: No
Medium High
VUC-22 13 Medium Medium Yes Yes Coordination with FEMA: Yes New Hazard Mitigation Project
Planning and Execution: No
Medium Medium
VUC-23 8 High Medium Yes Yes Coordination with FEMA, DWR, and DSOD: Yes
Emergency Action Plan Refinements:

No
Medium High
VUC-24 15 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
VUC-25 11 High High Yes Yes Collaboration with City of Oxnard: Yes OBRAP Flood Mitigation Project
Design and Implementation Actions: No
Medium High
Item No.7D

1. Ventura County (Unincorporated Area)
1-29
Action
#
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded Under
Existing Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
VUC-26 14 High Medium Yes Yes Coordination efforts with WCVC, its DAC, and NGOs: Yes
Flood Mitigation Project Design and
Implementation Actions: No
Medium High
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Table 1-17. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity Building
High-Risk Hazards
Landslides VUC-2 VUC-1 VUC-3, 16 VUC-20 VUC-11, 14 VUC-17, 18 VUC-3, 11, 12, 14, 15 Wildfire VUC-2, 9,
10 VUC-1, 9,
10 VUC-3, 9, 10 VUC-9, 10, 20 VUC-6, 7, 9,
10, 14
VUC-5, 9,
10 VUC-3, 5, 9, 10,
12, 14, 15
Earthquake VUC-2, 13,
23 VUC-1 VUC-3, 8 VUC-6, 7,
23 VUC-17, 18 VUC-3, 8, 12, 13,
15 Severe
Storms
VUC-2, 4,
22, 23
VUC-1, 19 VUC-3, 4, 16 VUC-20, 21 VUC-6, 7,
16, 23
VUC-17,
18, 24
VUC-5, 17,
18, 20
VUC-3, 4, 5, 11,
12, 15, 22
Severe
Weather
VUC-2, 22,
23 VUC-1, 19 VUC-3, 16 VUC-20, 21 VUC-6, 7,
16, 23
VUC-17,
18, 24
VUC-5, 17,
18, 20
VUC-3, 5, 11, 12,
15, 22
Dam Failure VUC-2, 4,
23 VUC-1, 19 VUC-3, 4 VUC-20 VUC-6, 7,
14, 16, 23
VUC-17,
18, 24
VUC-17,
18, 20
VUC-3, 4, 11, 12,
14, 15
Flooding VUC-2, 4,
22, 23
VUC-1, 19 VUC-3, 4, 16 VUC-20, 21 VUC-6, 7,
14, 23
VUC-17,
18, 24
VUC-5, 17,
18, 20
VUC-3, 4, 5, 11,
12, 14, 15, 22
Low-Risk Hazards
Sea Level
Rise
VUC-2, 4,
22 VUC-1, 19 VUC-3, 4, 16 VUC-20, 21 VUC-17, 18 VUC-5, 20 VUC-3, 4, 5, 11, 12, 15, 22
Tsunami VUC-2 VUC-1, 19 VUC-3, 16 VUC-20 VUC-6, 7 VUC-17, 18 VUC-3, 11, 12, 15 Drought VUC-2 VUC-3 VUC-20, 21 VUC-24 VUC-5, 20 VUC-3, 5, 15 a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types.

1.9 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• Ventura County Ordinance—The ordinance code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • 2040 General Plan—This document was reviewed to identify opportunities for hazard plan integration.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-30
• Coastal and Noncoastal Zoning Ordinances—These documents were reviewed to identify opportunities for hazard plan integration.
• Ventura County Subdivision Ordinance, 2020—This document was reviewed to identify opportunities for hazard plan integration.
• Initial Study Assessment Guidelines, 2011
• Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment, 2018
• Sea Level Rise Adaptation Report, 2019
• VCPWA-WP’s Integrated Watershed Protection Plan Project Prioritization Process— Explored possible opportunities to better integrate the development of multi-benefit flood protection project partnerships with public and private sector agencies and organizations aimed at improving community resiliency to flood hazard risk, flood plain management, groundwater conservation, stormwater capture, environmental protection, and helping to secure a sustainable water supply for agricultural and urban users. • VCPWA-WP 5 Year Capital Improvement Projects Plan, Annual Update—Confirmed inclusion of flood protection projects in WP’s current 5-year portfolio which address a mix of high, medium, and low hazard risks found in WP’s current Jurisdiction Annex, keying-up those projects as entries in WP’s new 5-year Action Plan portfolio, including seven levee rehabilitation projects which when completed will ultimately result in local compliance with Federal Levee Certification regulations found in 44CFR65.10.
• Ventura County Flood Mitigation and Safety Plans—Consulted current plan documents to identify opportunities of alignment and optimization of WP’s new 5-Year Action Plan submittal with the baseline framework found in these historical County flood mitigation and safety plan documents.
• VCPWA-WP’s Preparation of Annual Recertifications and Cycle Verification of Class V Rating for Unincorporated Ventura County under FEMA’s Community Rating System Program—Consulted the current Class 5 Rating program performance and reporting requirements to ensure continuation of this rating, as well as identified opportunities for renewed emphasis on the planning and implementation of flood mitigation projects for repetitive loss properties eligible for grant funding under FEMA’s Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program with the goal of reducing the number of repetitive loss properties in Ventura County.
• Ventura County Emergency Services Planning Documents—Reviewed emergency services planning documents prepared by the Ventura County Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services to gain a better understanding of how best to facilitate appropriate development of WP’s new 5- year Action Plan submittal by complementing and supplementing countywide risk hazard emergency planning rubric defined by County’s Emergency Action Plan, as well as refine Emergency Action Plans for the state-sized dams owned by the County. • Ventura County Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) Updates and DAC Public Outreach Engagement Initiative—Explored framing potential opportunities to better coordinate joint efforts to plan, develop, and ultimately construct multi-benefit, flood resiliency and other risk hazard mitigation projects contained in WP’s new 5-Year Action Plan submittal by increasing outreach and engagement with disadvantaged and socially vulnerable communities and tribal groups to better understand their unique community-lifeline vulnerabilities, facilitate Item No.7D

1. Ventura County (Unincorporated Area)
1-31
the development of flood hazard mitigation multi-benefit projects, and align and leverage advocacy efforts to optimize grant funding opportunities.

The following outside resources and references were reviewed:
• Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex Development Toolkit—The toolkit was used to support the identification of past hazard events and noted vulnerabilities, the risk ranking, and the development of the mitigation action plan.
• BEACON Regional Sediment Management Plan
• General Services Agency, Energy Action Plan, April 2010 • Climate Protection Plan for Government Operations, April 2012 • Los Padres National Forest Land Management Plan, 2005 The following website resources were used to document natural hazard event damage assessment:
• https ://www.vcstar.com/story/news/2019/11/12/ventura-county -avocado-lemon-growers-blame- losses-power-shut-offs/4171383002/
• https://gro-intelligence.com/insights/articles/volatile-california-avocado-crop-keeps-market-on- edge
• https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/2019/08/03/ventura-county-california- agriculture/1859539001/
• http://www.coastalview.com/news/2019-avocado-market-rundown-volumes-down-and-prices- up/article_1a24b732-da67-11e9-9fdf-43ac94face0a.html
• https://goldrushcam.com/sierrasuntimes/index.php/news/local-news/18925-2018-heat-reduces- volume-of-2019-avocado-crop-california-farm-bureau-federation-reports • https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/23/heatwave-hits-california-lemons-sending-prices-soaring.html • https://grist.org/article/so-howd-those-avocados-handle-the-searing-heatwave/ • https://www.rdniehaus.com/app/uploads/2019/08/RDN_Montecito_Mudslides_Impacts-1.pdf • https://www.kclu.org/local-news/2016-04-27/battered-south-coast-pier-set-to-reopen-after-1-4- million-in-repairs
• http://archive.vcstar.com/news/local/ventura/much-of-the-ventura-pier-remains-closed-this- week-26f4a712-45e6-0d4b-e053-0100007ffddb-362537201.html • http://archive.vcstar.com/news/local/ventura/ventura-pier-closed-due-to-high-surf-26a2626c- d797-40f2-e053-0100007f22a3-361574741.html
• https://archive.vcstar.com/news/waves-generated-by-hurricane-marie-threaten-pier-close- campground-beaches-ep-579996262-351261691.html/
• https://migration.ucdavis.edu/rmn/more.php?id=1194_0_2_0 • https://tdn.com/business/freeze-destroys-70-percent-of-california-orange- crop/article_de49ab3e-0d14-5b06-b53e-ea2dbcd115ce.html
• https://www.dailynews.com/2007/02/04/despite-freeze-hopes-are-high-for-spring-harvest/ • https://www.montereyherald.com/2007/09/13/not-all-is-lost-for-state-farmers-caught-in-freeze/ Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 1-32
The following website resources were used to document other noted vulnerabilities:
• https://www.vcnewschannel.com/news/480-county-homeless-encampments-efforts-update • https://www.conejoguardian.org/2021/09/23/county-fails-for-years-to-clear-illegal-riverbed- encampment/
• https://housefarmworkers.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/FAQs-about-ag.pdf • https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/2020/11/15/california-coronavirus-covid-19-ventura-county- financial-assistance-farmworkers/6265780002/
• https://housefarmworkers.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/FAQs-about-ag.pdf • https://www.kqed.org/news/11363886/deportation-threats-worry-farmworkers-and-owners

Item No.7D

2-1

2. CITY OF CAMARILLO

2.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Carmen Nichols, Assistant City Manager
601 Carmen Drive
Camarillo, CA 93010
805-388-5312
[email protected]
Roger Pichardo, Sr. Management Analyst
601 Carmen Drive
Camarillo, CA 93010
805-388-5392
[email protected]

Table 2-1 lists the members of the local hazard mitigation planning team that developed this annex.

Table 2-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title Name Title
Tali Tucker Assistant Director of Public Works/City Engineer Kristen Madary Finance/Accounting Manager David Moe Assistant Comm. Development Director Roger Pichardo Senior Management Analyst Jaclyn Lee Principal Planner Carmen Nichols Assistant City Manager Tom Magdaleno GIS Specialist Michelle D’Anna Community Relations Officer Tom Juzwiak Deputy Building Official Wendy Milligan Terra Firma Enterprises (Consultant)

2.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

2.2.1 Location and Features
Camarillo encompasses 19.86 square miles in west Ventura County at the base of the Conejo Grade, within the Oxnard Plain. The City is some eight miles from the ocean and the Pt. Mugu entrance to Naval Base Ventura County. Homes along the City’s northern border are nestled among rolling hills and citrus groves; the northernmost boundary traverses the Las Posas Country Club. Pleasant Valley Road designates much of Camarillo’s southern border, though the southernmost point is on Howard Road, near the southeast corner of the City. The eastern edge of Camarillo is situated partially up the Conejo Grade, along the Ventura Freeway (Hwy 101). Camarillo’s furthest point west is at the end (cul-de-sac) of Del Norte Road, just north of Hwy 101.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-2

2.2.2 History
The City of Camarillo was incorporated in 1964. In 1837, a large expanse of what would be the Conejo and Pleasant Valleys was established though a Mexican land grant, which Juan Camarillo purchased in 1875. Juan’s sons, Adolfo and Juan, Jr., would govern the 10,000-acre Rancho Calleguas for many years. Adolfo oversaw the development of the Camarillo House and Ranch in 1892, and his brother would have a prominent role in the construction of the St. Mary Magdalen Chapel in 1913.

In 1899, a line of the Southern Pacific Railroad was extended from Somis to Oxnard. At the time, a businessman named John Sebastian relocated a store and post office that were displaced from an area called Springville by the new rail line. When asked to provide a name for the new location of the store and post office, Sebastian suggested Calleguas, though the post office representative felt that name was confusing. Sebastian then proposed calling the area Camarillo, and by 1901 it was the official name for the settlement.

For years, from horse-drawn wagons to early automobiles, the route from Thousand Oaks north down the Conejo Grade involved 24 switchbacks. The journey was quite a trek, especially during warmer days. As travelers looked down the grade toward present day Camarillo, they often commented on it being such a pleasant valley.

Eventually, the region from Somis south to Pt. Mugu became known as Pleasant Valley and would be an integral part of the larger farming industry in Ventura County.

In 1942, with America involved in World War II, Naval Base Ventura County was commissioned, and a military airfield was built near Camarillo. In 1945, the airfield was officially known as Oxnard Air Force Base. The County of Ventura purchased the site in 1976 and began the transformation of the base to what is now Camarillo Airport.

In the early 1960s, a movement by the City of Oxnard to annex Camarillo galvanized community leaders, who organized a push for cityhood. In September 1964, cityhood was approved by voters and the following month Camarillo was officially recognized as an incorporated city. At the time, the City had approximately 12,000 residents, and an area of 5.5 square miles.

2.2.3 Governing Body
Camarillo is a general law city. The five-member City Council is the governing body with the responsibility of adopting the HMP. The responsibility for implementing the plan is shared by the Office of the City Manager, and the Community Development and Public Works Departments.

2.3 CURRENT TRENDS

2.3.1 Population
Camarillo has an estimated population of 70,261 (California Department of Finance estimate 2020).

Camarillo is currently growing at a rate of 1.42% annually (https://worldpopulationreview.com).

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-3

2.3.2 Development
Table 2-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

Table 2-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any
land since the preparation of the
previous hazard mitigation plan?
Yes
• If yes, give the estimated area
annexed and estimated number of
parcels or structures.

Annexations since the County’s last HMP update included a 3-acre parcel, initiated by the City, for the Camarillo LDS Church (n/e corner of Las Posas Road and Camino Alvarez); also, properties near the n/w corner of Lewis (Hwy 34) and Las Posas Roads were annexed for the development of the City’s new desalter plant. Construction is underway, and the desalter could be operational by early 2022. The City annexed 7.81-acres for the project from the Ventura Co.

Resource Conservation District, 4.5-acres of which is under the purview of the Camarillo Sanitary District.

Is your jurisdiction expected to
annex any areas during the
performance period of this plan?
No
Are any areas targeted for
development or major
redevelopment in the next five
years?
Yes. Over the past five years Camarillo has had significant residential construction activity, which is expected to continue for several years. A prominent commercial development is also underway just south of the 101 Freeway, and a steady progression of reuse and new industrial projects is anticipated.
• If yes, briefly describe, including
whether any of the areas are in
known hazard risk areas
The primary natural hazard concerns for Camarillo include earthquakes and liquefaction, and wildland fires. Ongoing drought and dry vegetation continue to pose an elevated risk for fires, though the main areas of concern are in existing hillside communities in the northern portions of the City. The main faults in/near Camarillo include the Bailey, Simi-Santa Rosa, and Wright Faults. While these faults have limited intersection with properties proposed for development, major ruptures along the state’s larger fault lines could generate substantial ground movement -- though to what extent is difficult to forecast. As is the case in much of Ventura County, liquefaction is a potential threat connected to earthquakes. Approximately 25% of Camarillo’s soil is identified as being in liquefaction zones, primarily in the southeast and southwest sections of the City.

Permits for new construction issued
since the preparation of the previous
hazard mitigation plan. (For single-
family, each residence equals one
permit; for multi-fam., the numbers are
total units. Multi-fam. refers to
apartments, townhomes, and duplexes.

A permit for one apartment building
may include 20 units.)
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 90 78 37 2 11
Multi-Family 67 821 619 199 53
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 4 9 8 6 2
Total 161 908 664 207 66
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-4
Criterion Response
Provide the number of new-
construction permits for each
hazard area or provide a qualitative
description of where development
has occurred.
• Special Flood Hazard Areas: 0
• Landslide: 0
• High Liquefaction Areas: 0
• Tsunami Inundation Area: 0
• Wildfire Risk Areas: Please see clarification below.

Of the considerable residential development in Camarillo over the past 5+ years, no units have been built, or are currently under construction within a 100-year flood zone. During this period, approximately 350 residences (low-medium-high density) have been built in 500-yr. areas, and another high-density project (385 units) is pending approval. There is a low-income project (75 units) proposed for a 2.5-acre site that is owned by the City; if these apartments are ultimately constructed, the project would likely require flood mitigation measures (100-yr.).

As noted, areas of greatest concern for wildland fire, and those most involved in PSPS events, are in the northwest section of Camarillo, and parts outside (north of) the City. A large project with 281 homes (single-family and duplexes) is under construction approximately 0.8-miles west of a high fire risk zone, with a very-high zone just beyond. This development, for persons 55 years and older, is located east of Hwy 34, on the north side of Upland Road. Another project that is currently under review would result in 248 low-medium density homes in a section of the Camarillo Springs Golf Course, which lies in a very-high fire risk zone.

Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your
jurisdiction’s buildable lands
inventory. If no such inventory
exists, provide a qualitative
description.

Under current zoning, and considering sites under construction or entitled for building, about 60- acres of land is under review for potential housing projects. Over 150-acres are proposed for changes in zoning for industrial projects. There are also 46-acres of commercially-zoned land just off (south of) the 101 Freeway, at Las Posas Road. This site has the potential for 325,000 sq. ft. of retail, though internet sales have changed the brick/mortar outlook for many retailers.

Additionally, another 25-acres of vacant land could be considered for recreational uses (ice rinks, bowling, etc.) in the future.

2.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Findings of the capability assessment were reviewed to identify opportunities to expand, initiate or integrate capabilities to further hazard mitigation goals and objectives. Where such opportunities were identified and determined to be feasible, they are included in the action plan. The “Analysis of Mitigation Actions” table in this annex identifies these as community capacity building mitigation actions. The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 2-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 2-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 2-5. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 2-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 2-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 2-8. • Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 2-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 2-10.

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-5
Table 2-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: 2019 CA Building Code, as amended by the City of Camarillo (Ord. 1167), adopted Oct. 23, 2019 Zoning Code Yes No No Yes
Comment: Title 19 of the Camarillo Municipal Code, as amended by the City of Camarillo (Ordinance 9), adopted February 10, 1965, including subsequent amendments.

Subdivisions Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: Camarillo Municipal Code Title 18, Subdivisions (Ord. 570), adopted May 23,1984 including subsequent additions and amendments
Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Camarillo Municipal Code Chapter 9.32, Stormwater Quality (Ord. 1074), adopted December 12, 2012 including subsequent additions and amendments
Post-Disaster Recovery No No No No
Comment:

Real Estate Disclosure No Yes Yes No
Comment: California Civil Code §1102
Growth Management Yes No No Yes
Comment: Title 20 of the Camarillo Municipal Code, as amended by the City of Camarillo (Ordinance 497), effective July 2, 1981, including subsequent amendments and extensions. The City reviews all residential projects of five or more dwelling units through the Residential Development Evaluation Board process in which the City Council may award up to 400 residential units per year to projects that meet the evaluation criteria with exemptions allowed for low-income units. SB 330 became effective January 1, 2020 and prevents the City from enforcing Title 20 until January 1, 2025. SB 8 was signed into law and extends the term of SB 330 five years from January 1, 2025, to January 1, 2030.

Site Plan Review Yes No No Yes
Comment: Title 19 of the Camarillo Municipal Code, as amended by the City of Camarillo (Ordinance 9), adopted February 10, 1965, including subsequent amendments.

Environmental Protection No No Yes Yes
Comment: California Environmental Quality Act, signed into law by the State of California in 1970.

Flood Damage Prevention Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: Camarillo Municipal Code Chapter 16.34, Flood Damage Protection (Ord 616), adopted August 27, 1986 including subsequent additions and amendments
Emergency Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Camarillo Municipal Code, Chapter 2.32—Emergency Management Systems, 2004 Climate Change Yes No No Yes
Comment: The City currently does not have any adopted ordinance related to Climate Change, however the City is planning on developing a Climate Action Plan in the near future.

Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? No
Comment: The City is currently updating its Safety Element, in compliance with AB 2140.

Capital Improvement Plan Yes No No Yes
How often is the plan updated? Every 5 years
Comment: City of Camarillo FY 2021-2026 Capital Improvement Programs, adopted 6/23/21 Disaster Debris Management Plan No No No No
Comment:

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-6

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Floodplain or Watershed Plan Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps, first Effective September 29, 1986 including subsequent additions and amendments Stormwater Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Ventura County Technical Guidance Manual, approved July 13, 2011 by LARWQCB. The manual provides guidance on the Planning and Land Development requirements in the Ventura County MS4 Permit, adopted July 8, 2010 by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board. City catch basin program prioritizes maintenance of catch basins as required by the VC MS4 Permit, adopted July 8, 2010.

Urban Water Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: City of Camarillo 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, adopted June 23, 2021.

Habitat Conservation Plan Yes Yes/ Federal No Yes
Comment: A habitat conservation plan is required as part of an application for an incidental take permit under the Endangered Species Act, however the City does not currently have any habitat conservation plans.

Economic Development Plan Yes No No No
Comment: City of Camarillo Economic Development Strategic Plan, September 5,2018 Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: No shoreline
Community Wildfire Protection Plan No Yes No Yes
Comment: Ventura County Community Wildfire Protection Plan, 2010 Forest Management Plan No Yes No No
Comment: City of Camarillo does have a Comprehensive Tree Plan and Approved Street List.

Climate Action Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: The City currently does not have a Climate Action Plan, however the City is planning on developing one in the near future.

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes Comment: The City Manager’s Office oversees emergency management and our EOC. We are currently updating the emergency operations plan (EOP). Section Eight-Hazard Summary for City of Camarillo presents a summary of all the hazards the City is subject to and references the Ventura County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan for more specific information. This Plan was approved October 13, 2021.

Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) No No No Yes Comment:

Post-Disaster Recovery Plan No No No Yes
Comment:

Continuity of Operations Plan No No No No
Comment:

Public Health Plan No Yes Yes No
Comment: Ventura County Public Health Emergency Response Plan, 2019 Other
Comment:

Table 2-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Planning, and the Building/Safety Divisions.

Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? No Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? Yes Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-7
Table 2-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes If yes, specify: Public Works user fees pertain to sewer and water connection.

Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas Yes
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes

Table 2-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development Department (Planning + Building and Safety), and Public Works (engineers in land development).

Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Building and Safety Division, and Public Works for infrastructure projects (streets, sewer, water, storm drains).

Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development and Public Works, though consultants are also hired for certain projects.

Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Building and Safety, and Public Works for infrastructure projects (streets, sewer, water, storm drains).

Again, consultants are hired for certain projects.

Surveyors No
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Administrative Services, GIS Specialist Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: The Sr. Management Analyst in the City Manager’s Office serves as the EOC Coordinator.

Grant writers Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Sr. Management Analyst, City Manager’s Office.

Other Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Civil Engineer, Public Works Dept.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-8
Table 2-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Links to several emergency preparedness websites are available on the City’s website (https://www.ci.camarillo.ca.us/departments/fire/emergencies.php).

Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: City of Camarillo Government Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn.

Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The City has an active Community Emergency Response Team.

Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: VC Alert, City “Notify Me!” Emergency Email Distribution, City website (www.cityofcamarillo.org) Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: VC Alert

Table 2-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) City Engineer (Public Works) Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? Yes What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? 1993 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meets When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact?
September 2018
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
No
Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? Yes How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction?a 664 What is the insurance in force? $203,471,400
What is the premium in force? $534,728
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction?a 21 What were the total payments for losses? $1,135,612
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-9
Table 2-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 111-10046
DUNS # Yes 070207006
Community Rating System No
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Yes Grading Class-2 Public Protection Yes 03/3X 12/21/2018
Storm Ready No
Firewise No
Tsunami Ready No

Table 2-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Medium
Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Champions for climate action in local government departments Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-10
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future.

Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: To be further evaluated in the Climate Action Plan that the City is planning on developing in the near future. a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

2.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

Resources listed at the end of this annex were used to provide information on integration. The progress reporting process described in Volume 1 of the hazard mitigation plan will document the progress of hazard mitigation actions related to integration and identify new opportunities for integration.

2.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• City of Camarillo General Plan, Safety Plan, Policy SAF-1.1a– Incorporate new and
updated hazards information relevant to the City of Camarillo into the Safety Element, Emergency Operations Plan, and/or Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, as appropriate. • City of Camarillo, Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), 2021 (pending approval)—Section Eight-Hazard Summary for City of Camarillo presents a summary of all the hazards the City is subject to and references the Ventura County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan for more specific information.
• Capital Improvement Plan—The capital improvement plan includes projects that can help mitigate potential hazards. The City will act to ensure consistency between the hazard mitigation plan and the current and future capital improvement plans. The hazard mitigation plan may identify new possible funding sources for capital improvement projects and may result in modifications to proposed projects based on results of the risk assessment. • Building Code, Title 16, Chapter 16.34.340, Hazard Mitigation Plan—Identifies that the planning commission shall consider whether proposed development is in or affects a known floodplain, practical alternatives to the proposed development if in a floodplain, impacts of the project on the floodplain and plans to mitigate the impact of the development on the floodplain.

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-11

2.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• Climate Action Plan—The Climate Action Plan is a comprehensive roadmap that outlines the specific activities that an agency will undertake to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Currently, the City does not have a Climate Action Plan but is planning to develop one in the near future. • Capital Improvement Projects—Capital improvement project proposals may take into consideration hazard mitigation potential as a means of evaluating project prioritization. • Post-Disaster Recovery Plan—The City does not have a recovery plan but may consider developing one as a mitigation planning action if funds become available. The plan will build on the goals and objectives identified in the hazard mitigation plan.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

2.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

2.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 2-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Table 2-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
COVID-19 Pandemic DR-4482 January 20,
2020 and
continuing
City did not experience any property damages from COVID19 just emergency protective measures response related costs total approximately $30,176.

Maria Fire

FM-5302 November 1,
2019
City was not directly impacted by this fire, however, The Arc of Ventura County opened a community shelter at the Camarillo Community Center.

Wildfires, Flooding,
Mudflows, and Debris
Flows
(Thomas Fire)
DR-4353 December 4,
2017- January
31, 2018
Although this fire burned 281,893 acres in both Ventura County and Santa Barbara County, the City was only indirectly impacted by smoke.

Camarillo Springs
Mudflow
November 1 and
December 12,
2014
Nov. 1 -Twenty homes were evacuated, including two homes that were severely damaged. Dec. 12. Sixteen homes were damaged, including 10 homes that were red-tagged
Springs Fire FM-5024 May 2 – 11,
2013 24,251 acres burned; 10 outbuildings destroyed; 6 commercial properties and 6 outbuildings damaged.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-12
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Wildfires, Flooding,
Mudflows, and Debris
Flows
DR-1731 October 21 –
March 31, 2008
Although Ventura County was impacted by the Ranch Fire, the City of Camarillo was not directly impacted except for heavy smoke.

Severe Freeze DR-1689 January 11 – 17,
2007
This disaster impacted mainly the citrus and avocado crops throughout Ventura County, but no crops in the City were impacted.

Shekell Fire FM-2681 December 3 – 6,
2006
This fire burned in Fillmore and Moorpark. Camarillo had no direct impacts from the fire only indirectly from smoke.

Day Fire FM-2677 September 25 –
30, 2006
City of Camarillo was not directly impacted except for heavy smoke.

Topanga Fire FM-2583 September 28 –
October 10,
2005
City of Camarillo was not directly impacted except for smoke.

Severe Storms, Flooding,
Landslides, and Mud and
Debris Flows
DR-1585 February 16 –
23, 2005
City experienced localized flooding. No significant losses were documented.

Severe Storms, Flooding,
Debris Flows, and
Mudslides
DR-1577 December 27,
2004 – January
11, 2005
Water and mudslides damaged at least two homes after debris jammed a city storm drain.

Wildfires, Flooding,
Mudflow and Debris Flow
DR-1498 October 21,
2003 – March
31, 2004
City of Camarillo was not directly impacted from the fires in Piru and Fillmore except for heavy smoke. Flooding caused downed trees and blocked roads.

Severe Winter Storms and
Flooding
DR-1203 February 2 –
April 30, 1998
Channel at Las Posas Rd. and Ventura Blvd. damaged ($500,000), clogged storm drains.

Camarillo Springs Golf course was damaged. It took 31 men about 10 full days of work to bring the course back to playability. Backed up storm drains impacted several homes. City Hall flooded.

Severe Winter Storms,
Flooding, Landslides, Mud
Flows
DR-1046 February 13 –
April 19, 1995
Large agricultural losses. Localized flooding and clogged storm drains. No major impact to the City of Camarillo.

Severe Winter Storms,
Flooding, Landslides, Mud
Flows
DR-1044 January 3 –
February, 1995
Localized flooding and clogged storm drains. No major impact to the City of Camarillo.

Northridge Earthquake DR-1008 January 17 –
November
30,1994
Drywall sustained large cracks; exterior concrete block walls sustained hairline cracks; a few chimneys were cracked; a few windows cracked; several small objects overturned and fell; light furniture overturned; heavy furniture was displaced; hanging objects and doors swung violently; many items were thrown from store
shelves; masonry fences or retaining walls were partially fallen; underground pipes were broken.

Fires, Mud & Landslides,
Soil Erosion, Flooding
DR-1005 October 26 –
April 22, 1994
Multiple fires around Ventura County and subsequent flooding. Camarillo was not directly impacted except for smoke from the surrounding fires and backed up storm drains.

Severe Storm, Winter
Storm, Mud & Landslides,
Flooding
DR-979 January 5 –
March 20, 1993
Camarillo trailer park flooded (Casa del Norte). Localized street flooding.

Snow Storm, Heavy Rain,
High Winds, Flooding,
Mudslide
DR-935 February 10 –
19, 1992
Countywide agricultural damages. City experienced localized street flooding.

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-13
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Severe Freeze DR-894 December 19,
1990 – January
3, 1991
Countywide agricultural damages. Agricultural crops within the City suffered losses to their crops. More than $100 million worth of avocados, oranges, strawberries and other fruits were destroyed.

Grass, Wildlands, Forest
Fires
DR-739 June 26 – July
19, 1985
City of Camarillo was not directly impacted except for heavy smoke.

Coastal Storms, Floods,
Slides, Tornadoes
DR-677 January 21 –
March 30, 1983
Countywide crop damage. Flood flows broke through the leveed banks of Calleguas Creek in the lower reach below U.S. 101 and caused an estimated $21.5 million in damage to agricultural properties. The City estimate of damages was $160,000.

Severe Storms,
Mudslides, Flooding
DR-615 January 8, 1980 Flooding countywide. No significant damage in the City of Camarillo Coastal Storms,
Mudslides, Flooding
DR-547 February 15,
1978
Evacuation of Leisure Village (150 homes) due to weakened earthen catch basin. Fallen trees (65-75) throughout the City totalling $500,000 loss.

Severe Storms, High
Tides, Flooding
DR-364 February 8, 1973 Countywide rain and flooding. Minor damages in the City of Camarillo Forest, Brush Fires DR-295 September 29,
1970
5 dwellings destroyed in the Camarillo Hills area, historic structure Rancho Lomita mansion destroyed and 10-15 outbuildings.

Severe Storms, Flooding DR-253 January 26,
1969
Downed trees. Flooded streets, bridge damage (Calleguas Road Bridge) curb and gutter damage. Flood Control damages estimated at $2,150, roads, streets and bridges damage is estimated at $110,979.

Heavy Rains, Flooding DR-211 December 7,
1965
Countywide flooding, Minimal damage to City of Camarillo.

2.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 2-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Table 2-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Earthquake 32 Medium
2 Severe Storms 24 Medium
3 Severe Weather 24 Medium
4 Dam Failure 22 Medium
5 Flooding 18 Medium
6 Landslidea 18 Medium
7 Wildfire 12 Medium
8 Drought 9 Low
9 Tsunami 0 Low
10 Sea Level Rise 0 Low
a. Landslide ranking is based only on the Very High susceptibility category.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-14

2.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

2.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 2-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Table 2-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 7—Develop a water conservation public outreach program to increase awareness about the drought, fines and penalties for overuse and solutions for conserving water.
 CAM-1
Comment: Ongoing. Water conservation information is on the City’s website regarding the City’s Stage 1 measures:

Including a rebate program to retrofit indoor plumbing fixtures with water-efficient versions. • Rebates for landscaping controllers and replacement of hose nozzles. • Daily inspections throughout the City’s water service area to ensure compliance with Stage 1 measures. • Best management tools for water conservation.

OA 11—Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.
 CAM-2
Comment: Ongoing. For several years, the City has been contacting the owners of apartment complexes (and one hotel) regarding the importance of retrofitting their soft-story carports. In March 2021, the City applied to Cal OES to retrofit the carports at four of these properties. Unfortunately, the grant did not get funded, but staff has continued to reach out to the owners about future grant applications and financing options.

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-15
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 13—Reinforce roads/bridges from flooding through protection activities, including elevating the roads/bridges and installing/widening culverts beneath the roads/bridges or upgrading storm drains.
 CAM-3
Comment: While no projects are currently planned, this may change in the near future.

CA 1—Broaden outreach efforts to get as many residents as possible registered with the VC Alert system.
 CAM-4
Comment: Ongoing. The City continues to disseminate information on the VC Alert and Pulse-Point programs through our CityScene and CERT-Scene newsletters, on our government TV channel programming, via social media, and on our website.

CA 2—Develop a vegetation restoration/enhancement program for areas that have shown to be susceptible to landslides.

Comment: A vegetation restoration program was implemented for the hillsides above the Camarillo Springs communities. These efforts were in response to extensive damage caused first by the Springs Fire, and later by landslides that occurred in Camarillo Springs. No programs are currently planned for other sites in Camarillo.

2.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 2-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 2-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 2-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Table 2-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimate
d Cost
Sources of
Funding Timelinea
Action CAM-1—Develop a water conservation public outreach program to increase awareness about the drought, fines and penalties for overuse and solutions for conserving water.

Hazards Mitigated: Drought
New & Existing 1, 17 Public Works None Medium Staff time and General Funds

HMGP, BRIC
Ongoing
Action CAM-2—Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
New & Existing 1, 9, 12, 16, 17 Community
Development/
Building & Safety
None Medium Staff time and
General Funds
Ongoing
Action CAM-3—Reinforce roads/bridges from flooding through protection activities, including elevating the roads/bridges and installing/widening culverts beneath the roads/bridges or upgrading storm drains.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
Existing 2, 6, 9 Public Works None High Staff Time,
General Funds,

HMGP, BRIC,
FMA
Ongoing
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-16
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimate
d Cost
Sources of
Funding Timelinea
Action CAM-4—Broaden outreach efforts to get as many residents as possible registered with the VC Alert system.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami, Drought, Sea Level Rise
New & Existing 1, 7, 17 Community
Relations Officer
None Low Staff Time,
General Funds
Ongoing
Action CAM-5—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Flood, Wildfire, Landslide New 19 City Manager’s
Office
Community Development /
Building and Safety, Public
Works
Low Staff Time,
General Funds
Ongoing
Action CAM-6—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami, Drought, Sea Level Rise
New & Existing 17, 19 City Manager’s
Office
Public Works/Community
Development/ Building &
Safety
Low Staff Time,
General Funds
Short-term
Action CAM-7—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flood
New & Existing 1, 4, 17, 18 Public Works FEMA Low Staff Time, General Funds
Ongoing
Action CAM-8—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including developing a Climate Action Plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Drought, Sea Level Rise, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 12, 15, 17,
19 Community
Development
Public Works Medium Staff Time,
General Funds,

HMGP, BRIC
Short-term
Action CAM-9—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power, including City Hall, Library, Corporation Yard, Sanitation Plant.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami Existing 2, 6 Public Works None Medium Staff Time,
General Funds,

HMGP, BRIC
Short-term
Action CAM-10—Analyze the feasibility of developing a Post-Disaster Recovery Pan and develop Plan should funds become available.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami New & Existing 2, 6, 8, 19 City Manager’s
Office
Low HMGP, PDM,
FMA
Short-term
Action CAM-11—Analyze the feasibility of developing a Debris Management Plan and develop Plan should funds become available.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami New & Existing 2 ,8, 18 Public Works None Low Staff Time, General Funds
Ongoing
Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-17
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimate
d Cost
Sources of
Funding Timelinea
Action CAM-12—Analyze the feasibility of developing a Continuity of Operations Plan and develop Plan should funds become available.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami New & Existing 8, 18 City Manager’s
Office
Low Staff Time,
General Funds
Short-term
Action CAM-13—Continue analyzing the cost/benefit of joining the Community Rating System program

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 9, 10, 16, 17 Public Works FEMA Low Staff Time, General Funds
Ongoing
Action CAM-14—Continue to participate in updating the County’s Community Wildfire Protection Plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 5, 8, 12, 17, 18 Ventura County
Fire Protection
District
Community Development Low Staff Time,
General Funds
Ongoing
Action CAM-15—Update Building Code to reference better the HMP for building in all hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami New & Existing 4 Community
Development/
Building & Safety
None Low Staff Time,
General Funds
Short-term
Action CAM-16—Develop a Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment specific to the City should funds become available.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Flooding, Landslide, Wildfire, Tsunami, Drought and Sea Level Rise
New & Existing 1, 17 City Manager’s
Office
Community Development Low/Medi
um
Staff Time,
General Funds,

HMGP, BRIC
Short-term
Action CAM-17—Analyze the feasibility of developing a City-specific Stormwater Management Plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Severe Storms
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 15, 17,
18 Public Works Ventura County
Watershed Protection
Low Staff Time,
General Funds
Short-term
Action CAM-18—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Flood, Wildfire, Landslide, Dam Failure Existing 9, 11 City Manager’s
Office
Community Development High HMGP, PDM,
FMA
Short-term
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Table 2-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
1 2 Low Medium No Yes No Low Medium
2 5 Medium Medium Yes No No Medium Low
3 3 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
4 3 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-18
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
5 1 Medium Low Yes No No Low Low
6 2 Low Low Yes No Yes Medium Low
7 4 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
8 7 Low Medium No Yes Yes Low Medium
9 2 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
10 4 Low Low Yes Yes No Medium Medium
11 3 Low Low Yes No No Low Low
12 2 Low Low Yes No No Low Low
13 7 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
14 6 Medium Low Yes No No Low Low
15 1 High Low Yes No Yes High Low
16 2 Low Low Yes Yes No Medium Medium
17 8 Low Low Yes No No Low Low
18 2 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Table 2-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
None
Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake CAM-2, 5, 15 CAM-18 CAM-2, 4, 6 CAM-3, 4, 9 CAM-2, 6, 10, 11, 12, 16
Severe Storms CAM-8 CAM-3 CAM-4, 6 CAM-4, 17, 9 CAM-3 CAM-8, 16 CAM-6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17
Severe Weather CAM-8 CAM-4, 6 CAM-17 CAM-4, 9 CAM-8, 16 CAM-6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 16
Dam Failure CAM-15 CAM-18 CAM-4, 6 CAM-4, 10, 9 CAM-6, 10, 11, 12, 16 Flooding CAM-5, 7, 8,
13, 15
CAM-3, 18 CAM-4, 6, 7,
13 CAM-17 CAM-3, 4, 10,
9 CAM-3 CAM-8, 16 CAM-6, 7, 8, 10, 11,
12, 16, 17
Landslide CAM-5, 15 CAM-18 CAM-4, 6 CAM-4, 10, 9 CAM-6, 10, 11, 12, 16 Wildfire CAM-5, 14,
15 CAM-14,
18 CAM-4, 6, 14 CAM-4, 10, 9 CAM-8, 16 CAM-6, 10, 11, 12, 14, 16
Low-Risk Hazards
Drought CAM-1, 8 CAM-1, 4, 6 CAM-8, 16 CAM-6, 8, 16 Tsunami CAM-15 CAM-4, 6 CAM-4, 9, 10 CAM-6, 10, 11, 12, 16 Sea Level Rise CAM-8 CAM-4, 6 CAM-8, 16 CAM-6, 8, 16 a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-19

2.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 2-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Table 2-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
CityScene newsletter (Hard-copy Print) Quarterly 22,000 Households CityScene newsletter (Email) Quarterly 1,005
CERTScene Newsletter (Email) Four issues per year 989
Cable TV channel Ongoing Unknown
Official City of Camarillo Government Website Ongoing Unknown Social Media: Facebook Ongoing/ As Needed 3,813 Followers Social Media: Instagram Ongoing/ As Needed 480 Followers Social Media: LinkedIn Ongoing/ As Needed 256 Followers Social Media: Twitter Ongoing/ As Needed 50 Followers
Marquee Sign (Carmen Drive/Paseo Camarillo) Ongoing Visible to Passersby

2.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• City of Camarillo Municipal Code—The Municipal Code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for HMP integration. • City of Camarillo General Plan, Safety Plan, Policy SAF-1.1a– The Safety Plan was reviewed for identifying risk assessment information and for identifying opportunities for HMP integration.
• City of Camarillo, Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)—The EOP was used to gather risk assessment information and to assess the City’s capabilities associated with response in addition to identifying opportunities for HMP integration. • City of Camarillo 2020 Urban Water Management Plan—The Urban Water Management Plan was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for HMP integration.
• City of Camarillo Economic Development Strategic Plan—The Economic Development Strategic Plan was reviewed for the full capability assessment. • Capital Improvement Plan—The Capital Improvement Plan was used to identify possible hazard mitigation actions to add to the HMP and to identify opportunities for HMP integration. • https://www.cityofcamarillo.org/departments/administrative_services/gis_maps.php, accessed October 4, 2021—Used to document location and features for the Jurisdictional Profile. • C ity of Camarillo, Resolution to Accompany Application for State Aid Under the Emergency Flood Relief Law, Resolution 585, May 28, 1969 -- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 2-20
• City of Camarillo, Resolution to Accompany Application for State Aid Under the Emergency Flood Relief Law, Resolution 586, May 28, 1969-—Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.

The following outside resources and references were reviewed:
• Ventura County Fire Protection District, Unit Strategic Fire Plan, May 2020, page 6—Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex Development Toolkit—The toolkit was used to support the identification of past hazard events and noted vulnerabilities, the risk ranking, and the development of the mitigation action plan.
• Levin, Charles, “Storm’s fury: flooding”, Ventura County Star, January 10, 2005, Main News, pg.1-- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment. • Dodge, Dani and Levin, Charles, “County gets a wet Christmas”, Ventura County Star, December 26, 2003, Main News, pg. 1-- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• Mansfield, Gregg, “Airport can see light at ditch’s end—Repairs on flood-damaged channel near completion EL NINO’S WAKE: Camarillo, county wrangle over who must come up with $500,000 to pay for work”, Ventura County Star, March 19, 1998, News, A3-- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• Zintel, Ed, “Out of bounds on the fairway—RAIN: Pre-planning helps courses survive deluge”, Ventura County Star, March 18, 1998, Sports, B4-- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• Mansfield, Ed, “Camarillans say city lagged in dealing with severe flooding—Neighborhood angry: Residents complain to council, but city defends its handling of job, says it couldn’t be everywhere at once during last Friday’s downpour”, Ventura County Star, February 13, 1998, New, A3-- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment. • Dewey, James, et.al., U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.Geological Survey, “Intensity Distribution and Isoseismal Maps for the Northridge, California, Earthquake Of January 17,1994”, 1995- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment. • Lozano, Carlos, “Storm Floods Camarillo Trailer Park : Weather: Rising water surrounds mobile home residents. Sheriff’s deputies airlift farm workers stranded in a field. More rain is expected”, Los Angeles Times, February 19, 1993, accessed digitally on October 18, 2021- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• Gorman, Gary, “1990 in Ventura County: Year in Review: Slow Economy: Freeze Ruins Crops”, Los Angeles Times, December 31, 1990, LA Times Archives- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Study, Volume 1 of 3, Ventura County, California, January 20, 2010- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• Bevol, Steve. “Weary county cleans up”, Camarillo Daily News, February 12, 1978, p.A1- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.
• “Worst Fire in History Hits City ”, Camarillo Daily News September 28, 1970, p.A1- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.

Item No.7D

2. City of Camarillo
2-21
• Sacram ento Associated Press, “President Johnson Declares County Disaster Area”, Camarillo Daily News, December 9, 1965, p.A2- Used to document natural hazard event damage assessment.

Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
!. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Health and Medical
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Camarillo
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«1
¬«34
£¤101
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Camarillo
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Camarillo
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
012 0.5
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Camarillo
NEHRP Soil Class
±
012 0.5
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Camarillo
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
012 0.5
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Camarillo
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Camarillo
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 1 20.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Camarillo
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Camarillo
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Camarillo
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Camarillo
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
012 0.5
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Camarillo
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
012 0.5
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«34
¬«
118
¬«
118
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CAL FIRE, Esri
Camarillo
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
±
012 0.5
Miles
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

3-1

3. CITY OF FILLMORE

3.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
D. Keith Gurrola, Fire Chief
250 Central Ave
Fillmore, CA 93015
805-524-1500
[email protected]
David Rowlands, City Manager
250 Central Ave
Fillmore, CA 93015
805-524-1500
[email protected]
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 3-1.

Table 3-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
D. Keith Gurrola Fire Chief
David Rowlands City Manager
Kevin McSweeney City Planning Director
Ines Ebell Planning Department Admin Assistant

3.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

3.2.1 Location and Features
The City of Fillmore is in the western portion of the County of Ventura, California.

The current boundaries generally extend from the Santa Clara River going north, the Sespe Creek going east, slightly east of Pole Creek going west and the northern city boundary is the start of the foothills to the Los Padres National Forest. Fillmore is bordered on three sides by waterways, encompassing an area of 4.3 square miles.

Fillmore is located in the historic Santa Clara River Valley which is primarily all agricultural land, used to grow a wide variety of fair weather crops. As mentioned, the City is bordered by three separate waterways and open wildlands to the north.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 3-2

3.2.2 History
The City of Fillmore was incorporated in 1914. The town was established in the late 1800s and was known primarily as a railroad stop for travelers. With its fertile soils, the town quickly became an agricultural community. Oil was discovered years later in the hills that surround the Community and Fillmore started supporting businesses associated with oil production and support services. With the decline of the oil industry, Fillmore was able to diversify with light industry. The agricultural image of Fillmore has never gone away and is still quite robust. Fillmore is now known as a “bedroom community” where the majority of its working class residents commute to other nearby cities to work.

3.2.3 Governing Body Format
The City of Fillmore is governed by a Council–Manager form of government.

The Fillmore City Council assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; the Fillmore City Manager will oversee its implementation through the oversight of the various City Departments.

3.3 CURRENT TRENDS

3.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the City of Fillmore as of January 2020 was 15,566. Since 2010, the population has grown at an average annual rate of 0.37 percent.

3.3.2 Development
General development, overall has been primarily single family dwellings with an occasional multi-family unit. An industrial business park has had only one project developed. Currently there are several plans for in-fill of multi-family structures.

Table 3-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

3.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Item No.7D

3. City of Fillmore
3-3
Table 3-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since
the preparation of the previous hazard
mitigation plan?
Yes
• If yes, give the estimated area annexed
and estimated number of parcels or
structures.
3 acres, 0 structures
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any
areas during the performance period of this
plan?
No
Are any areas targeted for development or
major redevelopment in the next five years?
Yes
• If yes, briefly describe, including whether
any of the areas are in known hazard risk
areas
Industrial Park, no known hazard areas
How many permits for new construction were
issued in your jurisdiction since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 30 73 19 124 133
Multi-Family 0 0 0 0 0
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 0 1 0 0 0
Total 30 74 19 124 133
Provide the number of new-construction
permits for each hazard area or provide a
qualitative description of where development
has occurred.

All of the permits issued were in the flood hazard area. There was no new development in the wildland-urban interface zone.

Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s
buildable lands inventory. If no such
inventory exists, provide a qualitative
description.
85%

The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 3-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 3-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 3-5. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 3-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 3-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 3-8. • Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 3-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 3-10.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 3-4
Table 3-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: 2019 CA Building Code, (Ord. No. 20-925, § 2, 1-28-2020) Zoning Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 6.04, (Ord. No. 19-904, § 1, 3-26-2019) Subdivisions Yes No Yes No
Comment: Chapter 6.08, (Ord 467 § 1 (part), 1975)
Stormwater Management Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 8.06, (Ord. No. 14-845, §§ 2, 3, 2-25-2014) Post-Disaster Recovery Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: 1994 City of Fillmore Zoning Code, County of Ventura Disaster Management Plan
Real Estate Disclosure No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: California State Civil Code 1102 requires full disclosure on natural hazard exposure of the sale/re-sale of any and all real property. 1994 City of Fillmore Zoning Code
Growth Management Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: Chapter 6.09 (Ord. 509 § 1 (part), 1980), County Green Belt Agreement Ventura County Ordinance No. 4512 (Adopted November 7, 2017)
Site Plan Review Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 6.08, Title IV (Ord. 467 § 1 (part), 1975) Environmental Protection Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 6.08.070 (Ord. 467 § 1 (part), 1975)
Flood Damage Prevention Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 6.16 (Ord. 602 § 1 (part), 1988)
Emergency Management Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 15.04.050 (Ord. 401 § 5, 1971)
Climate Change No No No No
Comment: None
Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? No
Comment: 2003 Plan Needs Updating
Capital Improvement Plan Yes No Yes Yes
How often is the plan updated? Every 5 Years
Comment: City of Fillmore
Disaster Debris Management Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Ventura County Disaster Recovery Plan, Adopted by BOS in April 2019 Floodplain or Watershed Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: City of Fillmore participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Stormwater Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Urban Water Management Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: City of Fillmore 2015 Urban Water Management Plan Habitat Conservation Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Item No.7D

3. City of Fillmore
3-5

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Economic Development Plan Yes No No No
Comment: Economic Development Collaborative of Ventura County Partnership Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: N/A
Community Wildfire Protection Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Forest Management Plan No No No No
Comment: N/A
Climate Action Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Emergency Operations Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: City of Fillmore Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) No No No No Comment: None
Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Covered in the EOP
Continuity of Operations Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: Covered in the EOP
Public Health Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: County of Ventura Health Care Agency Public Health Emergency Response Plan (ERP)

Table 3-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Planning, Building, Fire Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? Yes Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? Yes

Table 3-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes If yes, specify: All utilities
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas Yes
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes Other Yes (Maintenance Assessment Districts)

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 3-6
Table 3-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Planning, Engineering
Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Planning, Engineering
Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Planning, Engineering
Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Planning, Engineering, Finance Surveyors Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Engineering
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Engineering
Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Fire
Grant writers Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Finance, Fire

Table 3-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Both the Police and Fire Department websites contain information.

Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Yes, the major providers are all used for information sharing Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? No Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The City participates with County OES to disseminate emergency information Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Yes, we utilize County OES along with neighborhood notification via Police/Fire

Table 3-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Engineering Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Engineering Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? 1998 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meets When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact?
unknown
Item No.7D

3. City of Fillmore
3-7
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
If so, state what they are.

Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes If no, state why.

Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
No
Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? Unknown, would have to learn more How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction?a 74 What is the insurance in force? $22,517,800
What is the premium in force? $34,315
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction?a 37 What were the total payments for losses? $226,509
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Table 3-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 0611124092 N/A
DUNS # Yes 363056201 N/A
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule No N/A N/A Public Protection Yes 04/4X 2018
Storm Ready No N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready No N/A N/A

Table 3-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts High Comment: Members of City Staff participate in local, regional, state and national committees Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts High Comment: Members of City Staff participate in local, regional, state and national committees Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities High Comment: Through committee contacts, unlimited to access via internet Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory High Comment: Fillmore is a small geographical city with specifically known sources of emission Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts High Comment: Fillmore implements an extensive review process, the total number of projects are manageable Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks High Comment: City Staff participates at many levels
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 3-8
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes High Comment: Planning Commission and City Council advocate Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts Low Comment: Currently addressing vehicle exhaust emissions Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Medium
Comment: Costs effectiveness
Champions for climate action in local government departments Medium Comment: Looking at opportunities for all new vehicles and equipment Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Medium Comment: All levels of decision making are to embrace
Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Medium Comment: Looking for grants, new purchases
Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted High Comment: The City has full authority over all Departments Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Low Comment:

Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comment: General support, no negative reports
Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: General support, no negative reports
Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: Limited impact in short term
Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: Limited impact in short term, some impact from agriculture a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist, but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

3.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

3.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• Fillmore Municipal Code
Item No.7D

3. City of Fillmore
3-9
• Developer Impact Fees
• 1994 City of Fillmore Zoning Code
• 2015 County of Ventura Disaster Management Plan
• General Plan Land Use Element 2005

3.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• Central Ventura County Regional Fire Safe Council Wildland Fire Mitigation Plan—In future updates, the Wildfire Mitigation Plan may use or reference applicable wildfire hazard maps and risk data presented in this hazard mitigation plan. • City of Fillmore Capital Improvement Plan 2021—Capital improvement project proposals may take into consideration hazard mitigation potential to evaluate project prioritization.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

3.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

3.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 3-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

3.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 3-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

3.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 3-10
Table 3-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
COVID-19 Pandemic DR-4482 Jan 20, 2020-current N/A
Thomas Fire FM-5302 Dec 4, 2017-Jan 2018 No structural damage, but air quality issues and provided mutual aid.

Opened evacuation centers at the high school and the recreation facility.

Guiberson Fire FM-2839 Sept 2009 No structural damage, but air quality issues and provided mutual aid.

Day Fire FM-2677 Sept 2006 No structural damage, but air quality issues and provided mutual aid.

Wildfires DR-1498 Oct 2003 No structural damage, but air quality issues and provided mutual aid.

Severe Fires EM-3120 Oct 1996 No structural damage, but air quality issues and provided mutual aid.

Winter Storm DR-1046 Feb 1995 Economic impacts affecting agricultural packinghouses Northridge
Earthquake
DR-1008 Jan 1994 $50 million in damage and building inspectors red-tagged about 200 buildings and homes as too dangerous to inhabit.

Severe Storm DR-935 Feb, 1992 N/A
Severe Storm DR-615 Jan 1980 N/A
Flooding DR-547 Feb 1978 Evacuations
Sylmar Earthquake N/A Feb 9, 1971 N/A
Brush Fires DR-295 Sept 1970 Packing house within the city limits burned, but may have been an arson of opportunity.

Flooding DR-253 Jan 1969 Evacuations
Flooding N/A Numerous pre 1964 N/A
St Francis Dam
Disaster
March 12, 1928 $7 Million (1928)—Inundation of nearly the entire city, flooding, debris flows, destruction of infrastructure, high loss of life

Table 3-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Dam Failure 36 High
2 Earthquake 32 Medium
3 Severe Storm 24 Medium
4 Severe Weather 24 Medium
5 Wildfire 18 Medium
6 Flooding 18 Medium
7 Landslide 18 Medium
8 Drought 9 Low
Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of Repetitive-Loss Properties or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: 0
Item No.7D

3. City of Fillmore
3-11
Other Noted Vulnerabilities
The following jurisdiction-specific issues have been identified based on a review of the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, and other available resources: N/A • Two large-scale evacuations due to hazardous material fires. Both events triggered evacuations of 25 percent of the city’s population.
• City recreation facility is used as an evacuation center but lacks showers.

Mitigation actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

3.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 3-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Table 3-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to
Plan Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check
if Yes
Action #
in Update
F 1—Construction of Pole Creek Debris Basin. The basin is awaiting Ventura County Watershed District approval for improvements to Final and to accept construction. The Basin will accept mud and debris flow from the Pole Creek watershed in a 100 year rain event and protect all future homes in the Heritage Valley Parks Specific Plan consisting of 750 residential units. The debris basin project includes levees, basin maintenance roads and water flow to the Santa Clara River. The Basin is proposed to be owned and operated by Ventura County Water Shed Protection District.



Comment: The Basin was completed in 2009, it is maintained by the Developer until Ventura County Watershed accepts F 2—Completion of the Heritage Valley Parks Levees. Over 1.5 miles of soil cement levee was constructed for protection of a 100 year storm and water flow from the Santa Clara River. Parks and streets about the levee in order to avoid any emergency conflict with proposed residential units. The Levee system protects the 750 proposed residential units in the Heritage Valley Parks Specific Plan and a proposed 110 condominium project proposed by KB Homes.



Comment: The levee was completed in 2006 but not yet certified, awaiting final construction of the last few remaining residential units
F 3—Completion of the Lower Sespe Creek Levee. A ½ mile in length soil cement levee was constructed south of Hwy 23 to protect the newly constructed Water Recycling Plant and protect the future Business Park Master Plan.

Comment: This levee was completed in 2008 from Hy 126 south to the City limits F 4—Completion of the Central Avenue Storm Drain. A large storm drain was installed in Central Ave to protect the Central Business District from floods that historically threatened downtown.

Comment: This storm drain project was completed in 2008 and drains into the Santa Clara River, improvements will be made on last 100 yards
F 5—Continue to monitor the need to demolish abandoned and dilapidated buildings.  Comment: This is an ongoing project, numerous buildings have been demolished, looking for opportunities as they present themselves for additional structures Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 3-12

3.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 3-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 3-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 3-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Table 3-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met
Lead
Agency Support Agency
Estimat
ed Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action FIL-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Landslide Existing 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 Public
Works.

Community
Development
High Grant Funding-FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Short-term
Action FIL-2—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Landslide, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
17, 19
Community
Development
Public Works Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action FIL-3—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Landslide, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15
Public Works Community
Development
Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term
Action FIL-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 17 Public Works Community
Development
Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action FIL-5—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 19
Community
Development
Public Works Low Staff Time, General Funds,
Grant Funding-FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Short-term
Action FIL-6—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Landslide Existing 2, 19 Public Works Community
Development
High Grant Funding-FEMA HMA
(BRIC and HMGP)
Short-term
Action FIL-7—Study feasibility of developing a resilience hub in the city to provide the resources residents need to enhance their own individual capacity while also supporting and strengthening the community before and during a disaster event.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Landslide New 2, 3, 7, 8, 12, 17 Community
Development
High Staff Time, General Funds,
Grant Funding-FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Short-term
Item No.7D

3. City of Fillmore
3-13
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met
Lead
Agency Support Agency
Estimat
ed Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action FIL-8—Study feasibility of developing an alternative Emergency Operations Center (EOC) location to use during a disaster.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Terrorism New 2, 3, 7, 8, 12, 17 Community
Development
High Staff Time, Grant Funding-

FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP)
Long-term
Action FIL-9—Hardening of the City Water Delivery System and computerized upgrade.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Drought, Wildfire, Flooding, Terrorism New 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 Public Works High Staff Time, Grant Funding-

FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP)
Short-term
Action FIL-10—Continue and enhance the public outreach program for wildfire education and prevention among school children and the general community.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 17
Fillmore Fire
Department
Fire Safe Council Low Staff Time, Fillmore Volunteer
Firefighter Foundation, Grant
Funding—Edison International
Utility Grant
Ongoing
Action FIL-11—Maintain wildfire hazard fuel reduction program for areas that have been identified with overgrown or dead brush, trees and weeds to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program. (Coordinates with VCFPD Action VFP-6) Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11,
13, 14, 15, 18, 19
Fillmore Fire
Department
CAL FIRE, Ventura
County Fire Protection
District, Fire Safe
Council
Low FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMAP and
HMGP), Staff Time & General
Funds
Ongoing
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Table 3-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
1 5 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
2 16 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
3 12 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
4 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
5 17 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Medium
6 2 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
7 6 Medium High No Yes No Low Medium
8 6 Medium High No Yes No Low Medium
9 5 Medium High No Yes No Low Medium
10 11 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High High
11 12 High Low Yes Yes Yes High High
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 3-14
Table 3-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
Dam Failure FIL-2 FIL-1, 9 FIL-3 FIL-6 FIL-2, 3, 7
Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake FIL-2 FIL-1 FIL-3 FIL-6 FIL-2, 3, 7, 8
Severe Storm FIL-2 FIL-1, 9 FIL-3 FIL-6 FIL-5 FIL-2, 3, 7, 8 Severe Weather FIL-2 FIL-1, 9 FIL-3 FIL-6 FIL-5 FIL-2, 3, 7, 8 Wildfire FIL-2 FIL-1, 9 FIL-3, 10 FIL-10, 11 FIL-6 FIL-5 FIL-2, 3, 7, 8 Flooding FIL-2, 4 FIL-1, 9 FIL-3, 4 FIL-6 FIL-5 FIL-2, 3, 4, 7, 8
Landslide FIL-2 FIL-1 FIL-3 FIL-6 FIL-2, 3, 7
Low-Risk Hazards
Drought FIL-2 FIL-9 FIL-3 FIL-5 FIL-2, 3
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

3.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 3-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Table 3-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
Disaster preparedness Every September 500
Earth Day Every April 500
Hazardous vegetation chipping days May & September 100
Fire department children education 10 times a year 10,000

3.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• City of Fillmore Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • City of Fillmore Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance—The flood damage prevention ordinance was reviewed for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. • City of Fillmore General Plan—The GP was reviewed for the capability assessment. • City of Fillmore Capital Improvement Program—The CIP was reviewed for identifying opportunities for action plan integration.

Item No.7D

3. City of Fillmore
3-15
The following outside resources and references were reviewed:
• Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex Development Toolkit—The toolkit was used to support the identification of past hazard events and noted vulnerabilities, the risk ranking, and the development of the mitigation action plan.

Item No.7D

!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
!. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Fillmore
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«126
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Fillmore
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Fillmore
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Fillmore
NEHRP Soil Class
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Fillmore
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Fillmore
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Fillmore
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Fillmore
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Fillmore
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Fillmore
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Fillmore
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Fillmore
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Fillmore
¬«23
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CAL FIRE, Esri
Fillmore
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

4-1

4. CITY OF MOORPARK

4.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Mack Douglass, Program Manager
799 Moorpark Ave.

Moorpark, CA 93021
Telephone: 805-517-6241
e-mail Address: [email protected]
Kambiz Borhani, Finance Director
799 Moorpark Ave.

Moorpark, CA 93021
Telephone: 805-517-6249
e-mail Address:
[email protected]

This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 4-1.

Table 4-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
Mack Douglass Program Manager, Emergency Management
Robert Valery Parks and Facilities Supervisor
Leonard Mendez Public Works Supervisor
PJ Gagajena Assistant City Manager
Douglas Spondello Interim Community Development Director

4.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

4.2.1 Location and Features
Founded by Robert Poindexter in 1900 and incorporated in July 1983, the City of Moorpark is one of ten incorporated cities of Ventura County and is located in the eastern portion of the County. The City encompasses approximately 12.4 square miles and a population of 36,278 as of 2020. It is generally bounded by the City of Simi Valley to the east, the Tierra Rejada Valley and City of Thousand Oaks to the south, and unincorporated lands to the west and north. Lands west of the city are largely agricultural and protected from development by the Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources voter approved initiatives requiring the public’s vote before any agricultural or open space lands are rezoned for development. Lands to the north of City’s boundary are largely mountainous. It is connected to the region by two freeways, SR-118 to the east and SR-23 to the south, and Los Angeles Avenue (SR-118) to the west. Moorpark is home to Moorpark Community College, and is served by the Moorpark Unified School District for grades K-12.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-2
Significant geographical features include the Arroyo Simi, which runs from east to west through central Moorpark. The City is also bisected by State Routes 118 and 23.

4.2.2 History
What is known about the settled history of Moorpark begins with the Chumash tribe of Native Americans, who lived and traded in the area prior to the arrival of Spanish explorers in the 16th century and missionaries in the centuries that followed. The Chumash village of Quimisac was located northeast of present-day Moorpark in the vicinity of what is now known as Happy Camp Canyon Park.

Permanent settlement of the area can be traced back to successive eras of land ownership, starting with the gifting of the Rancho San Jose de Nuestra Señora de Altagarcia y Simi (Rancho Simi) to Francisco Javier Pico and his brothers by Governor Diego de Borica in 1795. When Moorpark was founded, the small farming communities of Fremontville and Epworth were already established in the area. In 1900, Robert W. and Madeleine Poindexter established a town site in anticipation of the arrival of the Southern Pacific Railroad and named it Moorpark, after the apricot variety that grew in the region.

A depot was constructed that year, and several buildings originally constructed in Fremontville and Epworth were relocated to the burgeoning town. Growth began in earnest after 1904, when the railroad tunnels through the Santa Susana Mountains were completed to the east, connecting the area to the Los Angeles basin. Early development in Moorpark was concentrated in the downtown area along High Street, with the area south of the railroad tracks remaining largely farmland for many years.

The railroad and its connection to faraway markets facilitated the growth of the agriculture industry, the economic lifeblood of Moorpark. In the City’s early years, dry land crops such as apricots, black-eyed beans, hay, and lima beans were the primary farming staples. Though agriculture remained an economic engine after World War II, the growth of turkey, chicken, and egg ranches fed the development of the poultry industry and a diversifying economy.

Moorpark became one of the first cities in the world to run off commercial nuclear power in 1957.

Moorpark Community College opened on September 11, 1967.

Moorpark was incorporated as a city on July 1, 1983, marking the most dramatic period of growth of new homes and businesses in the City’s history. This period saw a substantial shift in the Moorpark’s center of activity, with large-scale development occurring in many areas that had heretofore been used for agriculture. High Street and the surrounding area remained the social and retail center of Moorpark through the 1980s until commercial activity began to shift to the south and suburban-style, multitenant retail centers grew along Los Angeles Avenue. Significant growth in home construction began in the late 1970s and accelerated through the 1980s as subdivisions such as Mountain Meadows and Peach Hill expanded the city’s built footprint from the flatlands into the surrounding hillsides. Despite this growth, vestiges of the City’s history still remain. Moorpark contains three locally significant resources, nine Points of Historic Interest, and one built environment resource listed in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). Locally significant resources include the Taylor House, the First Southern Baptist Church and High Street’s Pepper Trees. The highest level of significance conferred on a historical resource in the City is applied to Tanner’s Corner, which is listed in the CRHR as an individual property.

Item No.7D

4. City of Moorpark
4-3

4.2.3 Governing Body Format
The City of Moorpark operates under a council-manager form of government. The City Council assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; the City of Moorpark will oversee its implementation.

4.3 CURRENT TRENDS

4.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the City of Moorpark as of January 2020 was 36,278. Since 2010, the population has grown at an average annual rate of 0.54 percent.

Moorpark’s median age of 37.6 is close to the County median of 37.9, but younger that the neighboring cities. The percentage of the population under 18 years old is 23.1 percent, close to the state and County and higher than its three neighbors. Its percentage of population 65 years and above is lower than the state and County and substantially lower than the neighboring cities.

4.3.2 Development
Table 4-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends. Figure 4-1 describes the existing land uses and development characteristics within the City of Moorpark.

Table 4-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since
the preparation of the previous hazard
mitigation plan?
No
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any
areas during the performance period of this
plan?
No
Are any areas targeted for development or
major redevelopment in the next five years?
Yes
• If yes, briefly describe, including whether
any of the areas are in known hazard risk
areas
There are several major development projects that have been entitled in various locations within Moorpark, including approximately 1,200 housing units, commercial and industrial projects. There are also several significant applications that are pending entitlement. Each site is unique but generally potential risks that have been assessed and mitigated with each project include areas of known liquefaction, potential flooding, and designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The Moorpark Community Development Department maintains a list of pending development projects on the City’s website.

How many permits for new construction were
issued in your jurisdiction since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 87 66 27 4 21
Multi-Family 0 0 0 0 185
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 16 10 7 6 10
Total 103 76 34 10 216
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-4
Criterion Response
Provide the number of new-construction
permits for each hazard area or provide a
qualitative description of where development
has occurred.

The majority of the City is within a designated Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.

Many properties near the Arroyo Simi are also within a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Large areas of the City are also vulnerable to liquefaction, primarily along the Arroyo Simi and tributary streams.

Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s
buildable lands inventory. If no such
inventory exists, provide a qualitative
description.

Moorpark is approaching build out, with infill and redevelopment projects comprising the bulk of our construction activity. Limited numbers of development projects located around the periphery of the City, such as Hitch Ranch are moving through the entitlement process, but may not break ground in the near future.

Figure 4-1. Moorpark Land Use and Development Characteristics Item No.7D

4. City of Moorpark
4-5

4.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Findings of the capability assessment were reviewed to identify opportunities to expand, initiate or integrate capabilities to further hazard mitigation goals and objectives. Where such opportunities were identified and determined to be feasible, they are included in the action plan. The “Analysis of Mitigation Actions” table in this annex identifies these as community capacity building mitigation actions. The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 4-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 4-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 4-5. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 4-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 4-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 4-8. • Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 4-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 4-10.

Table 4-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: California Building Code, 2019 Edition, adopted in Moorpark Municipal Code, Chapter 15.08 Building Code (Ord. 474 § 3, 2019)
Zoning Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Title 17, (Ord. 189 § 3 (8101-0), 1994) Subdivisions Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Title 16, (Ord. 334 § 1 Exh. A, 2006) Stormwater Management Yes No No Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Title 8, (Ord. 240 § 2, 1997) Post-Disaster Recovery Yes No No Yes
Comment: City of Moorpark Emergency Operations Plan. Last updated 2015, update currently underway Real Estate Disclosure No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: California State Civil Code 1102 requires full disclosure on natural hazard exposure of the sale/re-sale of any and all real property.

Growth Management Yes No No No
Comment: City of Moorpark General Plan. Last updated in 1992, comprehensive update is currently underway Site Plan Review Yes No No Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Chapter 17.44 Application Review Procedures. (Ord. 297 Exh. A, 2003) Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-6

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Environmental Protection Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: CEQA (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3) is implemented by the City for all land use impacts. On July 21, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution Number 2004-2224 and on September 15, 2004, the Moorpark Redevelopment Agency adopted Resolution Number 2004-142, establishing Procedures of the City of Moorpark and Moorpark Redevelopment Agency to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).The ongoing Comprehensive General Plan Update will include a program EIR.

Flood Damage Prevention Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Section 15.24 Floodplain Management (Ord. 279 § 1, 2002) Emergency Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Chapter 2.48 (Ord. 89-106 § 1, 1989) Climate Change Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Comprehensive General Plan update will contain a climate change element.

Planning Documents
General Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? Yes
Comment: Comprehensive General Plan update is currently underway Capital Improvement Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
How often is the plan updated? CIP is approved by City Council every seven years and updated by staff annually Comment: City of Moorpark Capital Improvement Program FY 2016/17-2022/23 Disaster Debris Management Plan No Yes No No
Comment: Ventura County Disaster Recovery Plan, Adopted by BOS in April 2019 Floodplain or Watershed Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Section 15.24. This code is current through Ordinance 20-488 and the March 2021 code supplement. The City participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Stormwater Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Moorpark Municipal Code Section 8.52 This code is current through Ordinance 20-488 and the March 2021 code supplement.

Urban Water Management Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A
Comment: City of Moorpark is not a water purveyor
Habitat Conservation Plan No No No No
Comment:

Economic Development Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: Comprehensive General Plan update will contain an economic development chapter.

Shoreline Management Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A
Comment: N/A
Community Wildfire Protection Plan No No No No
Comment: The city does not have this plan
Forest Management Plan N/A N/A N/A N/A
Comment: N/A
Climate Action Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Climate Action Plan Element will be part of the ongoing General Plan Update Emergency Operations Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: 2014 Moorpark Emergency Operations Plan. Comprehensive EOP Update currently underway.

Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) No Yes No No Comment: The city does not have this assessment
Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: This is part of the City of Moorpark Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) 2014 Item No.7D

4. City of Moorpark
4-7

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Continuity of Operations Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: 2014 Moorpark Emergency Operations Plan. Comprehensive EOP Update currently underway.

Public Health Plan No Yes Yes No
Comment: The General Plan Update will include an Element regarding Public Health however the City does not currently have a Public Health Plan. County of Ventura Health Care Agency Public Health Emergency Response Plan (ERP)

Table 4-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Community Development Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? No Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? Yes

Table 4-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service No
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas Yes
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes

Table 4-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development and Public Works Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works
Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development and Public Works Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Finance
Surveyors No
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications No
Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Program Manager, Finance Department Grant writers No
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-8
Table 4-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? No Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? No Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? No Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Community Emergency Response Team Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? No If yes, briefly describe:

Table 4-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Public Works Director Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? 2002 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meets When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact? Unknown Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed? No Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
No
Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? No How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction?a 117 What is the insurance in force? $39,692,000
What is the premium in force? $114,239
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction?a 2 What were the total payments for losses? $33,576
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Table 4-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 0611149138 N/A
DUNS # Yes 628053464 N/A
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule No N/A N/A Public Protection No N/A N/A
Storm Ready No N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready No N/A N/A

Item No.7D

4. City of Moorpark
4-9
Table 4-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Medium Comment: Staff and elected officials understand potential climate change impacts.t Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Low Comment:

Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Low Comment:

Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory Low Comment:

Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts High Comment: General Plan Update will include a climate action plan element.

Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Low Comment:

Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes High Comment: City Council and the City Manager have the authority to consider and direct action to address potential climate change impacts
Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts High Comment: City Council recently enacted an SB 1383 compliant ordinance, which will reduce GHG emissions from organic waste Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Low
Comment:

Champions for climate action in local government departments Unsure Comment:

Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Unsure Comment:

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comment:

Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Low Comment:

Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Medium Comment: Evidence of climate change is obvious in Moorpark and directly affects the lives of residents through sustained droughts, frequent wildfires, high wind events and Public Safety Power Shutoffs.

Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Unsure
Comment:

Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Unsure Comment:

Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment:

Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Unsure Comment:
a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist, but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-10

4.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

4.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• County of Ventura Hazard Mitigation Plan
• City of Moorpark Emergency Operations Plan
• City of Moorpark General Plan, Safety Element (2001)

4.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• City of Moorpark General Plan—The City of Moorpark is engaged in a comprehensive update to the General Plan and zoning ordinance that will include a full evaluation of potential hazards, climate issues, and Program Environmental Impact Report.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

4.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

4.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 4-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Item No.7D

4. City of Moorpark
4-11
Table 4-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
COVID-19 Pandemic DR-4482 January 20, 2020 and continuing COVID-19 Pandemic Maria Fire FM-5302-CA 11/1/2019 $6,199,112.56
Easy Fire FM-5298-CA 10/30/2019 $2,833,870.64
Heat Event N/A 7/4/2018 to 7/6/2018 Extreme 2-day heat event broke records across the county.

Thomas Fire FM-5224 December 4, 2017 Unknown
Winter Storms N/A 2/17/2017 to 2/18/2017 Rainfall amounts from 2 to 6 inches across coastal areas with up to around 10 inches in the local mountains
produced numerous reports of flash flooding as well as
mud and debris flows. Strong southerly winds with gusts up to 70 mph reported in some areas.

Guiberson Fire FM-2839-CA 9/22/2009 $8,033,270.01
Flash Flood N/A January 25, 2008 California Highway Patrol reported heavy rain and flash flooding near the community of Moorpark. Reports
indicated flash flooding along Tierra Rejada Drive at
Hillside Drive.

Severe Freeze Event DR-1689 1/11/2007 to 1/17/2007 4 nights of below freezing temperatures.

Shekell Fire FM-2681-CA 12/3/2006 $1,153,198.47
Winter Storms DR1577 1/7/2005 to 1/11/2005 Major roads including Highways 101, 126, 33 and 150 were closed for more than a week due to severe flooding Wildfires, Flooding,
Mudflow and Debris
Flow
DR-1498 October 21, 2003 – March 31, 2003 Unknown
1928 St. Francis Dam
Failure
N/A 3/12/1928 >530 people died; bridges, orchards, farms, homes all eradicated in flood’s path down the Santa Clara river
valley to the Pacific Ocean.

4.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 4-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Table 4-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Wildfire 36 High
1 Landslide 36 High
3 Earthquake 32 Medium
4 Dam Failure 26 Medium
5 Severe Weather 24 Medium
5 Severe Storms 24 Medium
7 Flooding 18 Medium
8 Drought 9 Low
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-12

4.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of Repetitive-Loss Properties or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: 0
Other Noted Vulnerabilities
The following jurisdiction-specific issues have been identified based on a review of the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, and other available resources:
• Loss of power due to human action (PSPS).
 At least 10 PSPS events affected the city during 2020, including several events that lasted for multiple days.
 Traffic signals were affected.
 City Hall itself was left on backup power for several days.  Police Service Facility has a lack of reliable power due to a faulty power switchover device.  City was unable to provide a cooling center to residents due to a lack of power.  A charity using a City Facility to conduct food bank operations is susceptible to loss of perishable items due to power outages.
• Frequent urban flooding at the intersection of Millard St. and Sherman Ave.

Mitigation actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

4.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 4-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Item No.7D

4. City of Moorpark
4-13
Table 4-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 1—Integrate the hazard analysis and mitigation strategy with the General Plan’s Safety Element.
 MPK-2
Comment: General Plan update including safety element is underway.

OA 6—Develop a public outreach program that informs property owners located in the dam and levee failure inundation areas about voluntary flood insurance.  MPK-7
Comment: Public Works requires additional staff resources to complete this Action.

OA 7—Develop a water conservation public outreach program to increase awareness about the drought, fines and penalties for overuse and solutions for conserving water. 
Comment: Done in concert with Calleguas MWD. Most recently implemented a drought impact plan on 7/01/15.

OA 8—Adopt emergency water conservation measures and/or water conservation ordinance to limit irrigation.

Comment: MMC 15.23.010 was amended most recently on 12/18/19.

OA 10—Seismically retrofit or upgrade seismically deficient government facilities and pre-identified shelter facilities.
 MPK-1
Comment: City Hall will likely be changing location to a seismically suitable facility in the near future OA 19—Maintain vegetation management program that provides vegetation management services to elderly, disabled, or low-income property owners who lack the resources to remove flammable vegetation from around their homes.  MPK-8
Comment: City requires additional staff resources to complete this action item.

MP 1—Generators: Purchase and install back-up generators for 3 facilities, one of which is often used by Ventura County Fire and Sheriff as an Incident Command Center and serves as an alternate Emergency Operation Center (EOC) for the City (Capital Improvement Project 7710)

Comment: Completed in 2009.

MP 2—Hazardous Mitigation Planning: Modify current Neighborhood and Business Watch Programs with focus on electronic format including real-time information exchange between law enforcement and the community

Comment: Completed in 2016.

MP 3—Wildfire Mitigation: Work with Ventura County Fire to consider siting/planning for a new fire station by Moorpark College (east end of City) 
Comment: Placement of new fire station under consideration by City and VCFPD.

MP 4—Mitigation Reconstruction: Reconstruct fire sprinkler system for the Community Center facility

Comment: Use of Community Center Facility may be modified or discontinued when City Hall changes location so this action is no longer feasible.

4.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 4-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 4-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 4-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-14
Table 4-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency
Support
Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action MPK-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Earthquake, Dam Failure, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Flooding Existing 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 City of Moorpark N/A High Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP)
Short-term
Action MPK-2—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including the City’s Emergency Operations Plan and General Plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 15, 17, 19
City of Moorpark N/A Low Staff Time, General
Funds
Ongoing
Action MPK-3—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Earthquake, Dam Failure, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Flooding, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 City of Moorpark N/A Low Staff Time, General Funds
Short-term
Action MPK-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Dam Failure
New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 17 City of Moorpark N/A Low Staff Time, General Funds
Ongoing
Action MPK-5—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including but not limited to the following:
• Climate Action Element of General Plan Update.
• Consider a goal or policy to establish Reach Building Codes with the General Plan Update • Consider inclusion of a Climate Action Plan following the General Plan Update Hazards Mitigated: Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Wildfire, Flooding, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, 15, 16, 19
City of Moorpark N/A Low Staff Time, General
Funds
Short-term
Action MPK-6—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Severe Storms Existing 2, 6, 19 City of Moorpark N/A Medium Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, HMGP),
Staff Time, General
Funds
Short-term
Action MPK-7—Provide reliable back up power for the Police Service Facility.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Earthquake, Dam Failure, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Flooding Existing 2, 6, 19 City of Moorpark N/A Medium Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, HMGP),
Staff Time, General
Funds
Short-term
Action MPK-8—Develop a public outreach program that informs property owners located in the dam and levee failure inundation areas about voluntary flood insurance.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 7, 17 City of Moorpark N/A Low Staff Time, General Funds
Ongoing
Item No.7D

4. City of Moorpark
4-15
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency
Support
Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action MPK-9—Maintain vegetation management program that provides vegetation management services to elderly, disabled, or low- income property owners who lack the resources to remove flammable vegetation from around their homes.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 5, 10, 13, 17 City of Moorpark VCFPD Medium Staff Time, General Funds
Ongoing
Action MPK-10—Proceed with construction of a storm drain to address flooding issues at Millard St. and Sherman Ave (CIP #504) Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
Existing 2, 6, 8 City of Moorpark Caltrans Medium Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time,
General Funds
Long-term
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Table 4-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
1 5 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
2 16 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
3 12 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
4 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
5 17 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Medium
6 3 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
7 3 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
8 2 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
9 4 Medium Medium Yes No Yes High Low
10 3 Medium Medium Yes Yes Yes High Medium
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 4-16
Table 4-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
Wildfire MPK-2 MPK-1 MPK-2, 3 MPK-9 MPK-6, 7 MPK-5 MPK-2, 3, 5, 9 Landslide MPK-2 MPK-1 MPK-2, 3 MPK-6, 7 MPK-2, 3
Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake MPK-1 MPK-3 MPK-6, 7 MPK-3
Dam Failure MPK-4 MPK-1 MPK-3 MPK-6, 7 MPK-3, 4
Severe Weather MPK-1 MPK-3 MPK-6, 7 MPK-5 MPK-3, 5
Severe Storms MPK-1 MPK-3 MPK-6, 7 MPK-5 MPK-3, 5
Flooding MPK-2, 4 MPK-1 MPK-2, 3, 8 MPK-6, 7 MPK-10 MPK-5 MPK-2, 3, 4, 5 Low-Risk Hazards
Drought MPK-3 MPK-5 MPK-3, 5
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

4.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 4-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Table 4-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
Community Emergency Response Team Ongoing 10-20

4.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• Moorpark Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • Moorpark Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance—The flood damage prevention ordinance was reviewed for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. • Moorpark Emergency Operations Plan—the Emergency Operations plan was examined for consistency with the County EOP and this Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 !. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Moorpark
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.!.!. !.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 !. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Moorpark
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Moorpark
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Moorpark
NEHRP Soil Class
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Moorpark
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Moorpark
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Moorpark
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Moorpark
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
00 . 6 5 1.30.325
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Moorpark
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Moorpark
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Moorpark
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Moorpark
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CAL FIRE, Esri
Moorpark
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
±
0 0.65 1.30.325
Miles
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Item No.7D

5-1

5. CITY OF OJAI

5.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
James Vega, City Manager
401 S. Ventura Street
Ojai, CA 93023
Telephone: (805) 646-5581 ext. 102
e-mail Address: [email protected]
Alma Quezada, Interim Public Works
Director
408 S. Signal Street
Ojai, CA 93023
Telephone: (805) 646-5581 ext. 209
e-mail Address:
[email protected]
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 5-1.

Table 5-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
James Vega City Manager
Lucas Seibert Community Development Director
Alma Quezada Interim Public Works Director
Andrea Mackey Management Analyst
James Hahn Technical Support Specialist
Juan Morales Interim Public Works Supervisor

5.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

5.2.1 Location and Features
The City of Ojai is located in the Ojai Valley. The current boundaries generally extend from Villanova Road to Boardman Road, encompassing an area of 4.37 square miles.

Ojai is a small town that is a known as a tourist destination for its boutique hotels, recreation opportunities, hiking, and farmer’s market of local organic agriculture. It is home to the annual Ojai Music Festival and the Ojai Tennis Tournament.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-2

5.2.2 History
City of Ojai was incorporated in 1921. The town was originally named Nordhoff in 1874 but was later changed to Ojai in 1917. Edward Libbey of Libbey Glass Company built the Spanish-style downtown Arcade and park that exist today.

5.2.3 Governing Body Format
The City of Ojai is a Council-Manager form of government with five Council members elected by district.

The City consists of five departments: Community Development, Finance, Public Works, Recreation, and the City Manager’s office. The City Council assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; the City Manager will oversee its implementation.

5.3 CURRENT TRENDS

5.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the City of Ojai as of January 2020 was 7,450. Since 2010, the population has grown at an average annual rate of 0.13 percent.

5.3.2 Development
Anticipated future development for the City of Ojai is low to moderate. Recent development has been mostly infill. There has been a focus on accessory dwelling units. Future growth in the City will be managed as identified in the City’s upcoming General Plan. City Actions such as those relating to land use, annexations, zoning, subdivision and design review, redevelopment, and capital improvements, must be consistent with the plan.

Table 5-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

5.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Item No.7D

5. City of Ojai
5-3
Table 5-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan?
No
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any areas
during the performance period of this plan?
No
Are any areas targeted for development or major
redevelopment in the next five years?
Yes
• If yes, briefly describe, including whether any of
the areas are in known hazard risk areas
Chaparral School site at 414 E. Ojai Avenue

DESIGN CONCEPT
Ojai Town Square development celebrates Ojai as the unique and special place that it is. The development responds to this character as a bookend to the Arcade and town center, enhancing the pedestrian neighborhood linked with outdoor spaces and surrounding public -oriented program uses.

The architectural expression is inspired by historic structures on the site as well as the statement of theme defined by City Ordinance. The concept finds the balance of history and future in a way that is distinctly ‘‘of Oja i.”

PROGRAM HIGHLIGHTS
• Establish a ±200 room hotel.
• Provide Residential Housing: Market Senior, Affordable. • Creating pedestrian -friendly gardens throughout the site. • Activate historic structures on Ojai Avenue for retail and restaurant use. • Provide ample parking to support the on -site activities. • Maintain the skate park as built
• Provide additional community programming opportunities. • Maintain 35 height limit to new structures.

How many permits for new construction were issued
in your jurisdiction since the preparation of the
previous hazard mitigation plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
437 419 438 432 23
Provide the number of new-construction permits for
each hazard area or provide a qualitative description
of where development has occurred.

One replacement single-family dwelling, 22 Accessory Dwelling Units, 2 by new construction, 7 by conversion, 13 legalized through the Compliance program.

Describe the level of buildout in the jurisdiction,
based on your jurisdiction’s buildable lands
inventory. If no such inventory exists, provide a
qualitative description.

The City is largely built out within city limits. The remaining pockets of infill land development opportunities within city limits are sprinkled throughout the City and respective zoning districts with smaller lots, which typically present some level of developable challenges.

The findings of the capability assessment are presented as follows:
• Table 5-3 presents an assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities • Table 5-4 presents development and permitting capabilities • Table 5-5 presents an assessment of fiscal capabilities • Table 5-6 presents an assessment of administrative and technical capabilities • Table 5-7 presents an assessment of education and outreach capabilities • Table 5-8 presents information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance • Table 5-9 presents classifications under various community mitigation programs • Table 5-10 presents the community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-4
Table 5-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: OMC 9-1.102 (§ 1, Ord. 718, eff. April 25, 1997) Zoning Code Yes No No Yes
Comment: OMC 10-2.202 (§ 3, Ord. 771, eff. February 13, 2004, as amended by § 1, Ord. 787, eff. February 10, 2006, § 2, Ord. No. 827, eff. June 28, 2013)
Subdivisions Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: OMC 10-3.301 (§ 2, Ord. 637, eff. January 9, 1986) Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: OMC 5-12.101 Co-permittee with the Ventura County Flood Control District Post-Disaster Recovery No No No No
Comment: None
Real Estate Disclosure No Yes Yes No
Comment: OMC 4-11.12 (§ 1, Ord. 738, eff. July 22, 1999, as amended by § 1, Ord. 744, eff. March 24, 2000, as renumbered by § 2, Ord. 800, eff. August 8, 2008)
Growth Management Yes No No Yes
Comment: OMC 10-6.101 (§ 1, Ord. 769, eff. January 8, 2004) Site Plan Review Yes No No Yes
Comment: OMC 10-2.101 (§ 3, Ord. 771, eff. February 13, 2004) Environmental Protection No No No No
Comment: None
Flood Damage Prevention Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: OMC 9-9.101 (§ 1, Ord. 655, eff. May 19, 1988, as amended by § 2, Ord. 914, eff. March 24, 2021) Emergency Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: OMC 3-1.01 (Part 2, Ord. 468, eff. March 29, 1973) Climate Change No No No No
Comment: None
Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? No
Comment: Currently being updated
Capital Improvement Plan Yes No No Yes
How often is the plan updated? Annually
Comment:

Disaster Debris Management Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Floodplain or Watershed Plan Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: The city participates in the NFIP.

Stormwater Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Management Program to discharge wastes for municipal storm water and urban runoff discharges under waste discharge requirements contained in Order No. 94-082, adopted on July 27, 2000 Urban Water Management Plan No Yes Yes No
Comment: Casitas Municipal Water District
Habitat Conservation Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Item No.7D

5. City of Ojai
5-5

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Economic Development Plan Yes No No No
Comment: General Plan guides economic growth
Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Community Wildfire Protection Plan No Yes No No
Comment: Ventura County Community Wildfire Protection Plan, 2010 Forest Management Plan Yes No No No
Comment: City of Ojai Community Forest Management Plan
Climate Action Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes Comment: Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), 2013
Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) No No No No Comment: Not a stand-alone plan, but addressed in the EOP Post-Disaster Recovery Plan No No No No
Comment: None
Continuity of Operations Plan No No No No
Comment: Not a stand-alone plan, but addressed in the EOP Public Health Plan No Yes Yes No
Comment: Ventura County Public Health Emergency Response Plan, 2019

Table 5-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Community Development Department Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? Yes Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? No

Table 5-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service No
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds No
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds No
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas No
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-6
Table 5-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development Dept./ City Planner Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development Dept./ Building Official Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development Dept. / City Planner Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Finance Dept./ Finance Director Surveyors No
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications No
Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: City Manager’s Office/ City Manager Grant writers No
Other No
If Yes, Department /Position:

Table 5-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? No Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? No Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? Yes If yes, briefly describe: ojai.ca.gov › emergency-preparedness Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Post pertinent information as required Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The City of Ojai Disaster Council Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: City Website, City smart phone App, government access TV channel, AM radio station Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: City Website, City smart phone App, government access TV channel, AM radio station

Table 5-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Department Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Public Works Dept. / Public Works Director
Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? 3/24/2021 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meet When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact?
N/A
Item No.7D

5. City of Ojai
5-7
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
Yes
If so, what type of assistance/training is needed? Ongoing training Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? Possibly How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction?a 79 What is the insurance in force? $25,299,000
What is the premium in force? $41,007
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction?a 43 What were the total payments for losses? $223,301
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Table 5-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 0611153476 N/A
DUNS # Yes 085921781 N/A
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule No N/A N/A Public Protection, contract with VCFPD Yes 03/3X 12/21/2018 Storm Ready No N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready No N/A N/A

Table 5-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts High Comment: City is aware of current drought issues and potential wildfire issues Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Low Comment:

Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Low Comment:

Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory Low Comment:

Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Low Comment:

Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Low Comment:

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-8
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes Low Comment:

Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts Low Comment:

Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Low
Comment:

Champions for climate action in local government departments Low Comment:

Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Low Comment:

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comment:

Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Low Comment:

Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk High Comment: Water use reduction due to drought
Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts High
Comment: Installation and use of solar power
Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts High Comment: Water conservation
Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment:

5.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

5.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• Building Code 9-1.102
• Capital Improvement Plan—Includes projects that can help mitigate potential hazards.

Item No.7D

5. City of Ojai
5-9

5.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• General Plan—Consider new update to the Housing Element • Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), 2013—Assesses threats from natural hazards that could impact the City.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

5.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

5.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 5-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Table 5-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event FEMA Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
COVID-19 Pandemic DR-4482 1/20/2020 and continuing $3-4 million in lost revenue Thomas Fire FM-5224 12/4/2017 No structures lost, City activated Emergency Operation Center, major impact to City
Pine Fire 6/30/2016 Unknown
Severe Storms, Flooding,
Debris Flows, and Mudslides
DR-1577 1/9/2005 Impacted City. Daly park and surrounding homes in neighborhood affected by mud
Wolf Fire 6/1/2002 Unknown
Lightning Strike 4/18/2000 One residential home struck Flood/Landslide 2/20/2000 Unknown
Ranch Fire 12/21/1999 Unknown

5.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 5-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings. The drought hazard has been increased from low to high to match Casitas Municipal Water District, City of Ojai’s water purveyor, and to better reflect local knowledge. The City is vulnerable to drought as it is dependent on Lake Casitas for water. As of October 2021, Lake Casitas is at 33% capacity—a Stage 3 drought. If lake level is reduced to 30% or less, CMWD would implement Stage 4.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-10
Table 5-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Landslide 33 High
2 Earthquake 32 High
3 Drought 30 High
4 Severe Storms 24 Medium
5 Severe Weather 24 Medium
6 Wildfire 18 Medium
7 Flooding 18 Medium
8 Dam Failure 12 Low

5.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

5.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 5-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Item No.7D

5. City of Ojai
5-11
Table 5-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 10—Seismically retrofit or upgrade seismically deficient government facilities and pre-identified shelter facilities.
 OJC-1
Comment: No action. Lack of funding
OA 11—Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.
 OJC-2
Comment: No action. Lack of staffing
OA 14—Acquire, relocate, or elevate residential structures, in particular those that have been identified as RL properties, within the 100-year floodplain.  OJC-1
Comment: No action. Lack of funding/staff
OA 21—Maintain hazards fuel treatment program for areas that have been identified with overgrown/dead brush/trees to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program.
 OJC-8
Comment: Ongoing tree and brush clearing for fire abatement

5.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 5-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 5-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 5-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Table 5-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action OJC-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Dam Failure Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11,
16 Community
Development Dept
Public Works Dept High FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
PDM and HMGP)
Short-term
Action OJC-2—Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
Existing 1, 9, 12, 16, 17 Community
Development Dept
Public Works Dept Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term Action OJC-3—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including General Plan Update, Emergency Action Plan Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Dam Failure New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 17, 19
Community
Development Dept
Public Works Dept Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-12
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action OJC-4—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Dam Failure, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15
City of Ojai Community
Development Dept
Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term
Action OJC-5—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 17 Public Works Dept Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing Action OJC-6—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Flooding, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 19
Enter Response Enter Response Low FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time,
General Funds
Short-term
Action OJC-7—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power, including Public Works Dept. and Recreation Dept.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Severe Weather, Wildfire Existing 2, 19 Public Works Dept Enter Response High FEMA HMA (BRIC and HMGP), Staff Time,
General Funds
Short-term
Action OJC-8—Maintain wildfire hazard fuel reduction program for areas that have been identified with overgrown or dead brush, trees and weeds to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program. (Coordinates with VCFPD Action VFP-6) Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11,
13, 14, 15, 18, 19
VCFPD

City of Ojai, CAL

FIRE & USDA
Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMAP
and HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Ongoing
Action OJC-9—Determine feasibility of the City of Ojai joining the Community Rating System (CRS) program to enhance public safety, reduce flood damage to property and infrastructure, and reduce flood insurance rates in the community.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 19 City of Ojai None Low Staff Time & General Funds
Short-term
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Item No.7D

5. City of Ojai
5-13
Table 5-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
1 8 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
2 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
3 16 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
4 12 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
5 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
6 17 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
7 2 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
8 12 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
9 3 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Table 5-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
Landslide OJC-3 OJC-1 OJC-4 OJC-7 OJC-4
Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake OJC-3 OJC-1 OJC-2, 4 OJC-7 OJC-4
Severe Storms OJC-3 OJC-1 OJC-4 OJC-6 OJC-4
Severe Weather OJC-3 OJC-1 OJC-4 OJC-7 OJC-6 OJC-4
Wildfire OJC-3 OJC-1 OJC-4 OJC-8 OJC-7 OJC-6 OJC-4
Flooding OJC-3, 5 OJC-1 OJC-4, 5 OJC-7 OJC-6 OJC-4, 5, 9 Low-Risk Hazards
Dam Failure OJC-3 OJC-1 OJC-4 OJC-4
Drought OJC-4 OJC-6 OJC-4
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

5.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 5-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Table 5-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date Number of People Involved
Social Media 8/2020 1,000
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 5-14

5.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• City of Ojai Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • City of Ojai Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance—The flood damage prevention ordinance was reviewed for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. • Capital Improvement Projects Program—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment.

Item No.7D

!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
!. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Health and Medical
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Ojai
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !. !.
!.
!.

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Ojai
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Ojai
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Ojai
NEHRP Soil Class
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Ojai
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Ojai
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Ojai
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Ojai
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Ojai
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Ojai
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Ojai
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Ojai
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Ojai
¬«33
¬«
33 ¬«
150
¬«
150
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CAL FIRE, Esri
Ojai
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Item No.7D

6-1

6. CITY OF OXNARD

6.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Scott Brewer, Emergency Services Manager
360 West Second Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
Telephone: 805-385-7717
e-mail Address: [email protected]
Alexander Hamilton, Fire Chief
360 West Second Street
Oxnard, CA 93030
Telephone: 805-385-7700
e-mail Address:
[email protected]
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 6-1.

Table 6-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
Alexander Nguyen City Manager
Jason Benites Police Chief
Eric Sonstegard Assistant Police Chief
Alexander Hamilton Fire Chief
John Colamarino Assistant Fire Chief
Brian Yanez Assistant Public Works Director
Mike More Risk Manager
Scott Kolwitz Planning Manager
Betsy George Chief Financial Officer
Terrel Harrison Cultural/Community Services Director
Stephen Fischer City Attorney
Tatiana Arnaout City Engineer/Floodplain Manager
Mike Shaffer GIS Manager
Katie Casey Communications Manager
Kathleen Mallory Planning & Sustainability Manager
Scott Brewer Emergency Services Manager
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-2

6.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

6.2.1 Location and Features
The City is located about 60 miles northwest of Los Angeles along a beautiful stretch of the Pacific Ocean coastline. The largest city within Ventura County, Oxnard is the center of a regional agricultural industry and a progressive business center while, at the same time, a relaxed seaside destination with a variety of neighborhoods and community services. Bordered by mountains and the Pacific Ocean, West Ventura County provides a seaside environment with expansive mountain views. Oxnard incorporates both of these attributes through its pattern of relatively compact urban development focused on the downtown, coastline and harbor, and the Highway 101 corridor. The moderate Mediterranean climate, fertile topsoil, and generally adequate groundwater supply lead to year-round agricultural production in the surrounding Oxnard Plain.

The City of Oxnard is located in the County of Ventura. The current boundaries generally extend from the Santa Clara River on the west to Del Norte Blvd on the east, as well as just north of the Highway 101 to the Pacific Ocean on the South, encompassing an area of 27.12 square miles.

6.2.2 History
Oxnard Incorporated: The City Oxnard was incorporated in 1903 by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors, who officially named the city after the Oxnard brothers. The city grew steadily into what is now the largest city in Ventura County, with a population of just over 207,000 residents.

Oxnard History: In 1896, local farmers began experimenting with sugar beets in addition to barley and lima beans. A prominent local farmer, Albert Maulhardt, visited Henry T. Oxnard and his three brothers’ American Beet Sugar factory in Chino, which led him to plant sugar beets for shipment to the plant.

Maulhardt’s success persuaded other ranchers to switch from grain to sugar beets.

Encouraged by a pledge of 18,000 acres of sugar beets from local farmers, the Oxnard brothers completed construction of a sugar beet factory adjacent to the beet fields in 1898 on what was then known as Rancho Colonia. The massive brick factory, with its 150-foot smokestacks, was located a few blocks northeast of a town-site that, five years later, would become the City of Oxnard.

The sugar beet factory was responsible for another significant event—bringing a spur line of the Southern Pacific Railroad to the plant site and passenger service to the community.

6.2.3 Governing Body Format
The City of Oxnard was incorporated as a general law city on June 30, 1903 and operates under a council-manager form of government. The City Council consists of the Mayor and six other Councilmembers. The term of office is four years for all elected officials, with elections held every two years for three City Council seats at a time. All Councilmembers are elected by district except for the Mayor, who is elected at large during presidential election years. The City Treasurer, who is elected Citywide at the same time as the Mayor, invests idle cash and manages the City’s investment portfolio.

The City Clerk, also elected Citywide at the same time as the Mayor and City Treasurer, manages the City Council and Committee meeting agenda process, official records, and elections.

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-3
The Oxnard City Council assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; the Oxnard Fire Department along with designated City departments will oversee its implementation.

6.3 CURRENT TRENDS

6.3.1 Population
According to the United States Census Bureau, the population of the City of Oxnard as of January 2020 was 207,887. Since 2010, the population has grown at an average annual rate of 0.48 percent.

6.3.2 Development
The Planning Division coordinates the City’s review of residential, commercial, office, and industrial development projects. This includes working with property owners, developers, business owners, and residents to ensure that their development proposals conform to City policies and guidelines.

Table 6-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

Table 6-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since
the preparation of the previous hazard
mitigation plan?
Yes
• If yes, give the estimated area annexed and
estimated number of parcels or structures.

Local Agency Formation Commission 18-07, Ocean View School District: 5.31 Acres, 1 Parcel
Local Agency Formation Commission 16-01, City of Oxnard Reorganization:

0.77 Acres, 1 Parcel
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any
areas during the performance period of this
plan?
Yes
• If yes, describe land areas and dominant
uses.

Teal Club Annexation—990 single and multifamily dwelling units, 132,000 square-feet of business park, 60,000 square-feet of commercial space, 17.76 acres of parks and open space. The project also includes annexation of 11.4 acres that is pre-zoned for light manufacturing uses.

Rio Urbana Annexation—The Rio Urbana annexation would allow the construction of a new mixed-use development that includes 182 condominium residential units and a 15,000-square-foot office building containing the Rio School District administrative offices.
• If yes, who currently has permitting
authority over these areas?
The County of Ventura currently has permitting authority over the Teal Club area and the Rio Urbana project site.

Are any areas targeted for development or
major redevelopment in the next five years?
Yes
• If yes, briefly describe, including whether
any of the areas are in known hazard risk
areas
Downtown adding up to 2800 units, The Village Specific Plan buildout, Northshore Development, Riverpark Specific Plan buildout, continued industrial development in Sakioka Farms Specific Plan. All areas are within city limits and all areas are in the liquefaction zone.

One annexation approval with 167 housing units is expected in 2021. One large specific plan annexation (Teal Club) with 990 units is under consideration.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-4
Criterion Response
How many permits for new construction were
issued in your jurisdiction since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 140 86 36 59 19
Multi-Family 26 27 18 34 42
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 17 12 10 7 7
Total 183 125 64 100 68
Provide the number of new-construction
permits for each hazard area or provide a
qualitative description of where development
has occurred.
• Special Flood Hazard Areas: 0—Based on FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) downloaded June 9, 2021 Using zones A, A99 , AE, AH, AO, & VE as SFHA and excluding zones X & D
• Landslide: 0—Based on Webservice of Seismic Hazard Zone Maps for Landslides produced by the Seismic Hazards Program, California Geological Survey, California Department of Conservation and downloaded from open data site on June 17, 2021 • High Liquefaction Areas: 540—Based on information contained hereon was obtained from California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology via the County of Ventura GIS
• Tsunami Inundation Area: 51—Based on information contained hereon was obtained from California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology via the County of Ventura GIS
• Wildfire Risk Areas: 0
Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s
buildable lands inventory. If no such
inventory exists, provide a qualitative
description.

Almost entire city (26 sq miles) is first or second generation construction. About 500 acres of farming remain within city limits in areas zoned for industrial or housing but not yet built. Planning capacity for about 8,000 units and 8 million sf industrial/commercial remains under the 2030 General Plan.

6.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Findings of the capability assessment were reviewed to identify opportunities to expand, initiate or integrate capabilities to further hazard mitigation goals and objectives. Where such opportunities were identified and determined to be feasible, they are included in the action plan. The “Analysis of Mitigation Actions” table in this annex identifies these as community capacity building mitigation actions. The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
● An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 6-3. ● Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 6-4. ● An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 6-5. ● An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 6-6. ● An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 6-7. ● Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 6-8. ● Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 6-9. ● The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 6-10.

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-5
Table 6-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes No Yes No
Comment: 2019 California Building Code as adopted by the City of Oxnard Ordinance No. 2968 Zoning Code Yes No Yes No
Comment: Chapter 16 (Inland Zoning Ordinance) and Chapter 17(Coastal Zoning Ordinance) of the Oxnard City Code (OCC) Pursuant to the California Coastal Act (Public Resources Code Division 20, Chapter 6, Article 1, 30500), the City shall prepare a Local Coastal Program for the portion of the coastal zone within its jurisdiction. The LCP is comprised of a Land Use Plan and a Local Implementation Plan which is the Coastal Zoning Ordinance.

Subdivisions Yes No Yes No
Comment: Chapter 15 of the OCC regulates and control the design and improvement of subdivisions of land within the city and supplement the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California set forth at Government Code Section 66410 et seq. concerning the design, improvement and survey data of subdivisions, the form and content of all maps provided for by the Subdivision Map Act, and the procedure to be followed in securing the official approval of the City regarding the maps.

Stormwater Management Yes No No Yes
Comment: Chapter 22, Article 12 implements the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq., as amended, and Division 7 of the California Water Code by prohibiting the discharge of any pollutant to navigable waters of the United States from a point source unless the discharge is authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the Metropolitan required by Clean Water Act Section 402 (33 U.S.C. Section 1342), and by prohibiting non-storm water discharges into the storm drain system.

Post-Disaster Recovery Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: The City of Oxnard does not have a separate disaster recovery plan, guidance and direction for disaster recovery is provided in the Oxnard Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)
Real Estate Disclosure No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: California State Civil Code 1102 requires full disclosure on natural hazard exposure of the sale/re-sale of any and all real property. To be implemented by sellers and realtors. City of Oxnard Ordinance 2383 requires that at the time of entering into an agreement of sale or exchange of any building, the owner or authorized representative shall obtain from the city a report of the building record showing the regularly authorized use, occupancy and zoning classification of such property.

Growth Management Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: California state law requires that every county and city prepare and adopt a comprehensive long-range plan to serve as a guide for community development. The General Plan for the City of Oxnard was amended and adopted in July 2011. The General Plan contains 10 elements that address many aspects of the community including: land use, housing, parks and open space, community design, circulation, infrastructure, safety, sustainability and conservation of resources. The General Plan is the City’s overarching policy document. All City policies and ordinances must be consistent with the General Plan.

The Planning Division is responsible for maintaining the General Plan and preparing amendments to the document as directed by the City Council. The City is preparing a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan consistent with SB39.

Site Plan Review Yes No No No
Comment: Chapter 15 of the OCC regulates the form and contents, submittal and approval of tentative tract maps for the subdivision of five (5) or more parcels and tentative parcel maps for the subdivision of four (4) or fewer parcels shall be governed by the provisions of this chapter. Chapters 16 and 17 of the OCC identify allowed uses and provide development standards that regulate development within the City.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-6

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Environmental Protection Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires state and local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if feasible. On June 28, 2017, the City Council adopted Resolution 15,040 approving an update to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Chapter 22 ,Article 12 implements the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (the Clean Water Act), 33 U.S.C. Section 1251 et seq., as amended, and Division 7 of the California Water Code by prohibiting the discharge of any pollutant to navigable waters of the United States from a point source unless the discharge is authorized by a permit issued pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System required by the Clean Water Act Section 402 (33 U.S.C. Section 1342), and by prohibiting non-storm water discharges into the storm drain system.

Chapter 18, Article 4 recently updated in December 2020 with the authority conferred by Cal. Gov’t Code sections 65302, 65560 and 65800 to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare.

Flood Damage Prevention Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 18, Article 4 recently updated in December 2020 with the authority conferred by Cal. Gov’t Code sections 65302, 65560 and 65800 to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety and general welfare.

Emergency Management Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Oxnard Emergency Operations Plan—City Ordinance No. 2916 Climate Change Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: The City is currently preparing a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan which intends to be comprehensive, robust and innovative to help the City plan for future climate goals and develop vision for how sustainability should be implemented in the City. The Climate Action and Adaptation Plan is anticipated to culminate with adoption by the City Council in mid/late- 2022.

Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? Yes
Comment: The City’s current 2030 General Plan contains Safety Element that includes goals and policies that address liquefaction and subsidence risk; coastline and beach preservation; emergency preparedness; and hazardous materials and uses.

Capital Improvement Plan Yes No Yes Yes
How often is the plan updated? Once a year
Comment: The City Council adopts a 5-year Capital Improvement Plan with the City Council making amendments on an annual basis.

Disaster Debris Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Ventura County Disaster Recovery Plan, Adopted by BOS in April 2019 Floodplain or Watershed Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: Chapter 18, Article 4 recently updated in December 2020 with the authority conferred by Cal. Gov’t Code sections 65302, 65560 and 65800 to adopt regulations designed to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. The City participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System (CRS)Class 7 Stormwater Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: The City is developing the Public Works Integrated Master Plan to develop long-term recommendations for policies, programs, and projects that successfully address and respond to immediate drought conditions while also planning for long- term water needs, reducing dependence upon costly imported water, addressing aging infrastructure and reliability concerns, pursuing aggressive goals for energy efficiency and sustainable solutions, maintaining compliance with changing regulatory requirements, and the ongoing loss of seasoned staff and personnel.

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-7

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Urban Water Management Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: The City has an adopted Urban Water Management Plan. The plan details long-term resource planning to ensure that adequate water supplies are available to meet existing and future water needs. In conjunction with the Urban Water Management Plan, a separate Water Shortage Contingency Plan, is also being prepared. The Water Shortage Contingency Plan outlines how an urban water supplier will respond to various stages of a drought or a prolonged shortage caused by other events.

Habitat Conservation Plan No No No No
Comment: Not applicable for the City of Oxnard
Economic Development Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: The City’s 2030 General Plan contains an Economic Development Chapter within the Community Development Element.

The City created a draft strategic plan which was presented to the Housing and Economic Development Committee and the Chamber of Commerce in 2020 before the pandemic. However, given that COVID significantly impacted the business landscape, staff will be working on a new strategic plan to emphasize business retention, workforce development, and site- based development.

Shoreline Management Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: The City of Oxnard is currently updating the City’s Local Coastal Program to address Sea Level Rise and coastal hazards.

Community Wildfire Protection Plan No No No No
Comment: Not applicable for the City of Oxnard
Forest Management Plan No Yes No Yes
Comment: Not applicable for the City of Oxnard
Climate Action Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: The City is currently preparing a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan which intends to be comprehensive, robust and innovative to help the City plan for future climate goals and develop vision for how sustainability should be implemented in the City. The Climate Action and Adaptation Plan is anticipated to culminate with adoption by the City Council in mid 2022.

Emergency Operations Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Oxnard Emergency Operations Plan
Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) No Yes No Yes Comment: We are currently evaluating the need to complete a THIRA for the City of Oxnard.

Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Disaster Recovery Operations are covered in the Oxnard Emergency Operations Plan Continuity of Operations Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Continuity of Government—Section within the Oxnard Emergency Operation Plan Public Health Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: County of Ventura Health Care Agency Public Health Emergency Response Plan (ERP) Other—Countywide Tsunami Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The County of Ventura has an existing plan that describes each City’s role and has been adopted locally. A revision of this document is required within the coming year.

Table 6-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Building and Safety Division of the Community Development Department Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? No The City does not currently track building permits
issued by hazard area.

Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? No Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-8
Table 6-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes No. Requires a vote of the people User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes If yes, specify: Water and Sewer
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds No. Requires a vote of the people Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas Yes
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes Other Yes
If yes, specify: Federal-sponsored grant programs

Table 6-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development, all Planners) Public Works—City Engineer; Supervising Civil Engineer
Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works—City Engineer; Supervising Civil Engineer; Project Manager; Senior Civil Engineer; Construction Inspector; Project Coordinator; Engineering Tech Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works—City Engineer Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works—Transportation Planner and Grants Coordinator Surveyors Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works (Consultant) Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Information Technology—GIS Manager, GIS Technician III, GIS Systems Analyst, GIS Programmer Analyst
Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No If Yes, Department /Position: None
Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Fire Department—City Emergency Services Manager Grant writers Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works—Grants Coordinator and Transportation Planner

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-9
Table 6-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? Yes If yes, briefly describe: City website has disaster preparedness and fire prevention information in English and Spanish Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: We have in the past used social media to address specific hazard mitigation issues.

Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Yes, the Fire Chief has an advisory “Team” that address emergency preparedness and hazard reduction issues. Organized “Neighborhood Councils” are also used to disseminate emergency preparedness and hazard mitigation information.

Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Community events such as: neighborhood fairs, emergency preparedness fairs, CERT training, neighborhood council meetings, homeowners’ association meetings are all used to disseminate emergency preparedness and hazard mitigation information.

Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: “Alert and Warning” procedures as described in the Oxnard Emergency Operations Plan and the VC Alert System

Table 6-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) City Engineer Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? December 2020 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meets If exceeds, in what ways?
When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact? 2017 Community Assistance Visit Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
If so, state what they are.

Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? Yes If so, state what they are. RiskMAP, Ventura County Levees Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes If no, state why.

Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
Yes
If so, what type of assistance/training is needed? Admin training Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? Yes, Class 7 If yes, is your jurisdiction interested in improving its CRS Classification? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? N/A How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction?a 497 What is the insurance in force? $166,210,700
What is the premium in force? $323,235
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction?a 71 What were the total payments for losses? $244,574
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-10
Table 6-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 06-111-54652 N/A
DUNS # Yes 081790214 N/A
Community Rating System Yes 7 N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Yes Residential: 3 Commercial Industrial: 2
2015/2016
Public Protection Yes 02/2X December 1, 2017
Storm Ready Yes N/A July 2021
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready Yes N/A July 2021

Table 6-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratings
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Medium Comment: The City is preparing a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP). Community engagement has highlighted interest in and knowledge of climate impacts.

Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Low Comment: The CAAP will establish programs and monitoring protocols.

Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Low Comment: Documentation prepared for CAAP and SLR and vulnerability study Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory High Comment: Through the CAAP this has occurred.

Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Medium Comment: This will come out of the CAAP.

Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks High Comment: Professional planner and focused position
Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes Medium Comment: This will come out of CAAP implementation.

Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts High Comment: The CAAP includes this information including strategies Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts High
Comment: The CAAP includes this information including strategies Champions for climate action in local government departments High Comment: The CAAP includes this information including strategies Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies High Comment: Financial support for CAAP study.

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comment: The CAAP includes this information including strategies Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Medium Comment: Addressed in CAAP engagement
Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-11
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratings
Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Medium Comment: Addressed in CAAP engagement
Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comment: Addressed through CAAP engagement
Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment: Input provided during sea level rise engagement and CAAP efforts Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment:

Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment:
a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist, but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

6.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

6.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• Oxnard Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)—The Emergency Operations Plan addresses the City of Oxnard’s planned response to extraordinary emergency situations associated with natural disasters, technological incidents, and national security emergencies. • Ventura County Mass Care and Shelter Plan—This document is intended for use during the preparedness phase to help guide care and shelter planning. It provides all the planning information and guidelines that are relevant for government’s consideration before opening disaster shelters. This document is intended to help cities plan for shelter operations, while also providing an overview of the complete scope of care and shelter services. • Ventura County Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan—The County of Ventura Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) provides the structure and processes that all key partner agencies within the county use to respond to, and initially recover from, a major emergency or disaster event.
• California Tsunami Evacuation Playbook (Ventura County, City of Oxnard)—This playbook is designed to help the emergency managers with tsunami evacuation and Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-12
response activities. The goal is to protect the residents within the local Tsunami Inundation Zone by providing guidance for early warning and coordinated evacuations. • 2030 City of Oxnard General Plan—The General plan contains a Safety Element that includes goals and policies that address liquefaction and subsidence risk; coastline and beach preservation; emergency preparedness; and hazardous materials and uses.

6.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• 2030 City of Oxnard General Plan: The 2030 General Plan should be revised to address hazard mitigation plan elements as needed in the 2022 HMP program and consider integration opportunities by adopting relevant policies in future Safety Element. updates • Local Coastal Program (LCP) Update: The City is in the process of a comprehensive LCP update. One of the goals of the City’s LCP update is to consider and address Sea Level Rise (SLR) and to ensure that policies to implement adaptation options occur in a way that protects the City’s coastal economic vitality, community character, public and private property, coastal resources and public safety.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

6.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

6.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 6-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

6.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 6-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-13
Table 6-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event FEMA Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Rain and High Wind Event January 19, 2021 Trees down, road closures, power outages, damage to structures
Pandemic Influenza COVID-19 4482-DR-CA January 20, 2020 Continuing Ongoing Atmospheric River Storm
System
CA Disaster 109 January/February 2019 Local stream and street flooding, trees down, power outages
Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows,
and Debris Flows
DR-4353 December 4, 2017- January 31,
2018
Post Thomas Fire debris flows in local rivers,
large deposits of debris on local beaches,
road closures
Thomas Fire 4224-DR-CA December 4, 2017 Public Health issues due to smoke, power outages, sewage spill due to power outage
February Winter Storm CA Disaster 77.1 February 2017 Local stream and street flooding, trees down, power outages, debris deposits in local
stream and on beaches
January Winter Storm CA Disaster 77 January 2017 Local stream and street flooding, trees down, power outages, debris deposits in local
stream and on beaches
Extreme Windstorm February 2016 Trees down, power outages, street closures, damage to structures, debris
Erratic Weather (frost, heat,
drought)
Winter 2013 Damage to crops, economic loss
Tsunami (7.1 earthquake in
Japan)
March 11, 2011 Damage to local harbors, marinas and docks Tsunami (8.8 Quake in Chile) February 27, 2010 Damage to local harbors, marinas and docks Storm and Flood January 18 – 22, 2010. Local stream and street flooding, trees down, power outages
Wildfires, Flooding, Mudflows,
and Debris Flows
DR-1731 October 21 – March 31, 2008 Post burn, flooding, debris and mud flows.

Severe Storm DR-1267 January 7 – 11, 2005 Flooding and debris flows “El Nino” Storm and Flood February 1998 Street and stream flooding, debris flows Storms and Floods January and March, 1995 Unknown
Northridge Earthquake DR-1008 January 17 – November 30, 1994 Power and communications disruptions, damage to structures
Storm and Flood February 10-15, 1992 Street and stream flooding, debris flows Earthquake (Whittier Narrows
Earthquake)
October 1, 1987 Unknown
Storm and Flood February 25-March 3, 1983 Street and stream flooding, debris flows Storm and Flood February 13-22, 1980 Street and stream flooding, debris flows Sespe Creek Flood March 4, 1978 Street and stream flooding, debris flows Storms and Floods (Calleguas
Creek Flood)

February 28-March 5, 1978 Street and stream flooding, debris flows St Francis Dam Disaster March 12, 1928 $7 Million (1928)—Inundation of nearly the entire city, flooding, debris flows, destruction
of infrastructure, high loss of life
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-14
Table 6-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Dam Failure 36 High
2 Earthquake 32 Medium
3 Severe Storm 24 Medium
4 Severe Weather 24 Medium
5 Flooding 18 Medium
6 Landslide 18 Medium
7 Sea Level Rise 18 Medium
8 Tsunami 12 Low
9 Drought 9 Low
10 Wildfire 0 Low

6.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 7 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: N/A • Number of Repetitive-Loss or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: N/A Other Noted Vulnerabilities
The following jurisdiction-specific issues have been identified based on a review of the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, and other available resources:
• Unreinforced Masonry and Soft Story Structures—Oxnard has numerous unreinforced masonry and soft story buildings within the city limits. These buildings are subject to severe damage or structural collapse during a moderate to severe earthquake. • H omeless Population—A significant number of persons commonly defined as “Homeless ” live in the Santa Clara River and other undeveloped areas. During wildland fires, storms and flooding these individuals are at great risk.
• S treet and Urban Flooding—There are numerous areas of the city that flood to varying degrees during periods of high rain. The effects of this flooding range from street closures to damage to property, vehicles and buildings.
• Power Outages/Emergency Power—Local power outages have resulted from high winds and storm conditions as well as from the effects of wildland fire in the region. Many key city buildings including the Main City Hall and Council Chambers buildings have no back-up power or emergency generators.

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-15
• Debris Flows—Following heavy rains and winter storms, substantial debris flows have occurred in the Santa Clara River as well as other local streams and culverts. Debris flows following wildland fires are particularly bad and can require removal of material from streams, streets, culverts and beaches.
• Li quefaction Potential—Nearly the entire City of Oxnard is located in a “Liquefaction Zone”.

The effects and damage caused by seismic activities can be amplified resulting in increased damage to buildings and infrastructure.
• Tsunami Awareness and Notification—Oxnard has a large visitor and tourist population who may not be aware of the tsunami risk.
• Sea Level Rise (SLR)—SLR is an identified flooding threat to the future of the City of Oxnard.

Therefore, planning for local adaptation and resiliency is an identified City Council priority and part of the Local Coastal Program update. It is a complex and difficult issue that will require strong coordination at the federal, State, and local level over the long term to effectively plan for and adapt to changing variables over time. Adaptation strategies are based upon various SLR projections anticipated to occur in years 2030, 2060, and 2100. • Drought—Much of California, Ventura County and the City of Oxnard has been experiencing a multiyear drought. Continued drought can directly impact land use, development options, as well as economic development in the city. This includes negatively impacting business development, including expansion and retention and support for agricultural resources and industries. More prolonged and severe drought conditions could potentially impact potable water supplies to the point of creating a public health and safety emergency.  For
background: The City of Oxnard purchases 40-50% of its total water supply from Calleguas Municipal Water District. This water is State Water Project water supplied by Metropolitan Water District. In addition to State water, the City of Oxnard supplements its remaining water needs from groundwater that is pumped by the City (20-30%) and by the United Water Conservation District (20-30%). According to the 2021 Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP), the Oxnard Subbasin water has experienced drier than average conditions since 2015 and anticipates little change to the water elevation level due to the current drought. The subbasin is currently at a level categorized as being in overdraft per the GSP.

Mitigation actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

6.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
The following table summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-16
Table 6-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Action Item Completed
Removed;
No Longer
Feasible
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OX 3—Increase participation in the NFIP by maintaining a CRS rating Class 9, which through enhanced floodplain management activities would allow property owners to receive a discount on their flood insurance.

Comment: Increased participation by upgrading CRS rating from Class 9 to Class 7. The City will continue to maintain CRS rating Class 7.

OX 4—Develop a tool to collect and analyze post-flood disaster risk assessment information to allow the City of Oxnard to analyze the effects of the flood and implement future mitigation projects. Information to be collected will include: number and location of structures, including RL properties, flooded; identification of flooded areas outside of the SFHA and floodwater heights at these locations; number and location of failed gages; etc.
 OXN-19
Comment: Information is being collected as required by CRS program. The tool is to be developed once funding is available. Funding was requested in FY 21-22 for this purpose
OX 5—Continue to participate in the NWS TsunamiReady Program through continued implementation of Guideline 4: Community Preparedness measures, including public outreach material and curriculum.
 OXN-10
Comment: Oxnard continues to participate in the TsunamiReady Program and will be updating and renewing its application again this year. This is an ongoing program.

OX 6—Evaluate Santa Clara Levees 1, 2 and 3 for upgrade and construction.  Comment: Evaluations have been completed by the County of Ventura. Levees are County-owned.

OX 7—Construct a Mandalay Beach storm drainage system to the Channel Islands Harbor. During rain events, stormwater accumulation along Mandalay Beach Road is caused by wind and sand blocking the drainage to the ocean outfall.  OXN-20
Comment: This is currently being mitigated with a dedicated portable pump that is deployed and turned on during storm events. Pump station construction is estimated at $30M+ and has not been completed due to lack of funding.

OX 8—Construct a permanent lift station for Ventura Road @ Wagon Wheel Road.

Water in the low point in the roadway must be manually pumped with each rain event.

Comment: The improvements are currently in the design phase. Wagon Wheel Development conditioned to construct.

OX 9—Construct a stormwater lift station at Perkins Road. Flooding occurs at the point in Perkins Road which is caused by an undersized sump pump. The proposed stormwater lift system will transport stormwater to the Advanced Water Purification Facility and recycle the storm water for agricultural use along Hueneme Road.  OXN-20
Comment: Currently being mitigated with a portable pump that is turned on during storm events. Pump station has not been completed due to lack of funding. The discharge location may change so discharge location is not included in the updated action plan.

OX 10—Construct a permanent flood protection pump station at Dodge Road.

Flooding occurs at the low point in Dodge Road at the intersection with Maulhardt Road.
 OXN-20
Comment: Currently being mitigated with a portable pump that is turned on during storm events. Pump station has not been completed due to lack of funding.

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-17
Action Item Completed
Removed;
No Longer
Feasible
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OX 11—As part of the Memorandum of Agreement / Memorandum of Understanding with The Nature Conservancy (TNC): continue to partner with TNC on acquisition, restoration and mitigation planning processes; partner on grant proposals; participate in negotiations with land use owners; carry-out restoration projects; hold titles to floodplain properties as appropriate; and hold or co-hold with TNC multipurpose easements.
 OXN-21
Comment: In 2016, the California State Coastal Conservancy, City of Oxnard, and The Nature Conservancy (collectively known as the Ormond Beach Partners) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to actively coordinate and collaborate across the Ormond Beach Partners’ respective properties that total over 630 acres in order to protect, manage, and restore the Ormond Beach Area. The Project Partners are leading the Ormond Beach Restoration and Public Access Plan (OBRAP), with the goals of restoring the natural ecosystem and habitats and improving public access and enjoyment of Ormond Beach while protecting nature. The Ormond Beach Partners have held two public outreach meetings soliciting public input on the OBRAP in 2017 and 2019. The Ormond Beach Partners will conduct a public outreach meeting in 2021 to highlight the Preferred Alternative and Preliminary Design. The next phases of the OBRAP will be the environmental review, gap assessment, final design, permitting, funding and construction.

6.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 6-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 6-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 6-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Table 6-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action OXN-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami Existing 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 Public Works. Community
Development
High HMGP, PDM, FMA Short-term
Action OXN-2—Amend General Plan Safety and Hazard Element text and as needed hazard maps, to reflect updated mapping of hazard areas identified by this Hazard Mitigation Plan, FEMA, Cal Fire, or the CA Seismic Hazard Mapping Program, in addition to background data associated with Local Coastal Plan update and background work associated with the City’s Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP)
Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
17, 19
Community
Development
Public Works $500,000 Staff Time, General Fund,
Grant Funding, FEMA
HMA, BRICK, Pre and
Post Disaster Mitigation
Grant Funding
Short-term
Action OXN-3—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this Hazard Mitigation Plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15
Public Works Community
Development
Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-18
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action OXN-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
● Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
● Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. ● Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 17 Public Works Community
Development
Low Staff Time, General Funds Short term
and
ongoing
Action OXN-5—Develop, approve, and implement the City’s Climate Action and Adaptation Plan (CAAP); including adaptive strategies to address hazards.

Hazards Mitigated: Sea Level Rise, Flooding, Wildfire, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 19
Community
Development
Public Works High Staff Time, General Funds Short-term
and on
going
Action OXN-6—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power, & as recommended by the City’s CAAP .

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire New & Existing 2, 19 Public Works Community
Development
Estimated:
$500,000 per
generator
(avg.)
Staff Time, General
Funds, Enterprise Funds,

HMGP, PDM
Short-term
Action OXN-7—Retrofit existing Seawalls at Mandalay Bay in order to withstand seismic events per the latest provisions in the California Building Code (CBC, 2019)
Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
Existing 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 19 Public Works Community
Development
Estimated:
$200,000,000
Staff Time, General
Funds, HMGP, PDM,
FMA
Short-term
Action OXN-8—Replace existing 45-inch diameter water transmission main that is critical as a lifeline for residents, industry, and national defense, including the region’s military base. This project will prevent seismic-related failure of the transmission line of State Water Project water that provides potable water to a population of approximately 245,000. This pipeline supplies 60% of the City of Oxnard’s water and 50% of the City of Port Hueneme’s water which is then purveyed to Naval Base Ventura County’s Point Mugu and Port Hueneme installations.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
Existing 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 19 City of Oxnard City of Port Hueneme Estimated:
$50,000,000
Staff Time, Enterprise
Funds, HMGP, PDM,
FMA
Short-term
Action OXN-9—Develop a comprehensive Sea Level Rise (SLR) Adaptation Plan to be implemented in the four identified coastal planning areas located within the City’s coastal zone to adopt long term adaptation policies and strategies to identify, manage, and reduce SLR impacts on coastal resources, private property and critical City facilities. The SLR adaptation policies and strategies included in the Local Coastal Program update would also be coordinated with the Climate Action and Adaptation Plan to address SLR vulnerabilities.

Hazards Mitigated: Sea Level Rise
New & Existing Enter Response
1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19
Public Works Community
Development;
County of Ventura and
Harbor Department;
City of Port Hueneme;
U.S. Department of
Defense (Navy)
High Grant
State
Federal
Long Term
Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-19
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action OXN-10—Continue to participate in the NWS TsunamiReady Program through continued implementation of Guidelines for Community Preparedness measures, including public outreach material and curriculum. In 2021 Oxnard updated its application and has received approval from the NWS as a TsunamiReady Community. This is an ongoing program

Hazards Mitigated: Tsunami
New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 12, 17,
18, 19
Emergency
Services
Manager
Oxnard Fire and Public
Works Departments
Low Staff Time, Enterprise
Funds, EMPG, DHS
Ongoing
Action OXN-11—Construction of Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) wells in order to ensure future reliable and affordable supply of high-quality water for the Oxnard Plain.

Hazards Mitigated: Drought
Existing 2, 4, 6, 9, 11, 19 City of Oxnard State Division of Drinking Water
High Staff Time, Enterprise
Funds, HMGP, PDM,
FMA
Short-term
Action OXN-12—Develop and implement a resident and visitor tsunami awareness and safety public education and outreach program.

Provide tsunami awareness, hazard, safety, and evacuation information at visitor locations including hotels, vacation rentals, campgrounds and day use recreational areas. Program would include signs, posters, handouts and public presentations.

Hazards Mitigated: Tsunami
New 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 12, 17,
18, 19
Oxnard Police
and Fire
Departments
Oxnard Community
Development
Low Staff Time, Enterprise
Funds, EMPG, DHS
Short-term
Action OXN-13—Engage in a study to determine the best methods and strategies to communicate hazards and warnings to the city’s homeless population, particularly those living in undeveloped areas such as fields, creeks and riverbeds. Warnings would include notification of impending or immediate dangers.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire New 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 12, 17,
18, 19
City of Oxnard High Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time,
Enterprise Funds
Short-Term
Action OXN-14—Engage in a feasibility study to determine if Oxnard Fire Station 6 can be retrofitted, replaced or relocated due to seismic and tsunami hazards.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Tsunami
Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19 Oxnard Fire
Department
City Planning
Department
High Grant Funding-FEMA
HMA (BRIC, HMGP), Staff
Time, Enterprise Funds
Short-Term
Action OXN-15—Engage in a feasibility study to determine if Oxnard Fire Stations 2, 3, 4 & 5 can be retrofitted, replaced or relocated due to seismic hazards.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19 Oxnard Fire
Department
City Planning
Department
High Grant Funding-FEMA
HMA (BRIC, HMGP), Staff
Time, Enterprise Funds
Short-Term
Action OXN-16—Implement the findings of the feasibility studies with retrofits to, relocation of, or replacement of existing City Fire Stations including, Stations # 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. These stations were built between 1954 and 1978 prior to current building standards. Damage to these stations could seriously impact fire, rescue and EMS service within the City.

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-20
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action OXN-17—Engage in a feasibility study to determine if the Oxnard Police Headquarters building, including the Dispatch facilility, can be retrofitted or should be replaced due to seismic hazards.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
New 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 12, 17,
18, 19
City of Oxnard Oxnard Police
Department
High Grant Funding-FEMA
HMA (BRIC,HMGP), Staff
Time, Enterprise Funds
Short-Term
Action OXN-18—Implement the findings of the feasibility study by retrofitting or replacing Oxnard Police Headquarters building. This will include expansion of the Dispatch facility to accommodate equipment for the radio and data traffic needed to support disaster response communications.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Tsunami, Severe Storms, Dam Failure, Wildfires, Flooding Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 18, 19 Oxnard Police
Department
Oxnard Fire
Department
High Grant Funding-FEMA
HMA (BRIC, HMGP), Staff
Time, Enterprise Funds
Short-Term
Action OXN-19—Develop a tool to collect and analyze post-flood disaster risk assessment information to allow the City of Oxnard to analyze the effects of the flood and implement future mitigation projects. Information to be collected will include: number and location of structures, including RL properties, flooded; identification of flooded areas outside of the SFHA and floodwater heights at these locations; number and location of failed gages; etc.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 17 City of Oxnard High Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time,
Enterprise Funds
Short-Term
Action OXN-20—Construct pump stations for roadway areas affected by chronic flooding including, but not limited to:
• Mandalay Beach storm drainage system to the Channel Islands Harbor. During rain events, stormwater accumulation along Mandalay Beach Road is caused by wind and sand blocking the drainage to the ocean outfall. • Construct a stormwater lift station at Perkins Road. Flooding occurs at the point in Perkins Road which is caused by an undersized sump pump.
• Construct a permanent flood protection pump station at Dodge Road. Flooding occurs at the low point in Dodge Road at the intersection with Maulhardt Road.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Severe Storms
Existing 2, 6, 10, 11 Public Works High Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time,
Enterprise Funds
Short-Term
Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-21
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action OXN-21—As part of the Memorandum of Agreement / Memorandum of Understanding with The Nature Conservancy (TNC):
• Continue to partner with TNC on acquisition, restoration and mitigation planning processes • Partner on grant proposals
• Participate in negotiations with land use owners
• Carry-out restoration projects
• Hold titles to floodplain properties as appropriate
• Hold or co-hold with TNC multipurpose easements.

Secure a Consolidated Coastal Development Permit to cover conservation and preservation activities over the next five years (2021-2026) that consist of the following:
• Nesting shorebird protection activities
• Invasive plant removal activities
• Access road and trail maintenance activities
• Field data collection and research.

Collaborate with Ventura County Public Works Agency-Watershed Protection, TNC, and State Coastal Conservancy to advance planning, design, and implementation of the Ormond Beach Restoration and Access Plan (OBRAP), particularly those components alleviating flooding along the Ormond Lagoon Waterway and creating public access along tšumaš Creek. This supports the VCPWA-WP Action VCPWA-13.

Hazards Mitigated: Drought, Flood, Severe Weather, Severe Storms, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami Existing and New 1, 2, 3, 9, 12, 13, 14,
15, 17, 18, 19
City of Oxnard VCPWA-WP Medium Staff Time, Enterprise
Funds, FEMA Grants
(BRIC),
CDFG
Ongoing
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Table 6-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Priority
Grant
Pursuit
Priority
OXN 1 5 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 2 16 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
OXN 3 12 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
OXN 4 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
OXN 5 17 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Medium
OXN 6 2 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 7 6 High High Yes Yes No High High
OXN 8 6 High High Yes Yes No High High
OXN 9 17 Medium High No Yes No Low Medium
OXN 10 9 High Low Yes Yes Yes High Low
OXN 11 6 High High Yes Yes No High High
OXN 12 9 High Low Yes Yes No High High
OXN 13 9 Low Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 14 8 Medium Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 15 8 Medium Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-22
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Priority
Grant
Pursuit
Priority
OXN 16 8 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 17 9 Medium Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 18 8 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 19 3 Medium High No Yes No Medium Medium
OXN 20 4 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
OXN 21 11 Medium Medium Yes Yes Yes High Medium
a. See the introduction to this volume for an explanation of priorities.

Table 6-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Hazard Type
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typesa
Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Building
High-Risk Hazards
Dam Failure OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 6
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 6, 18
OXN-2, 3, 4,
13 OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 6
OXN-2, 3, 4,
6, 13, 18
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 6, 18
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 6
OXN-4, 13,
18 Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake OXN-2, 3, 6,
8, 14, 15, 16
OXN-2, 3, 6,
8, 14, 15,
16, 17, 18
OXN-2, 3, 8,
13 OXN-2, 3, 6 OXN-2, 3, 6,
8, 16, 17, 18
OXN-3, 6,
14, 15, 16,
17, 18
OXN-2, 6 OXN-8, 13,
14, 15, 16,
17, 18
Severe Storm OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 20, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 18, 20
OXN-2, 3, 4,
5, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 20, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 18, 20
OXN-1, 2, 3,
18, 20
OXN-1, 2, 4,
5, 20, 21
OXN-4, 5,
18, 21
Severe Weather OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6
OXN-3, 4, 5,
6, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 6
OXN-1, 3, 5 OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 21
OXN-4, 5, 6,
21 Flooding OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7,
20, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7,
18, 20, 21
OXN-2, 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 13, 19
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 7, 20,
21 OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 18,
20 OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 7, 18, 20
OXN-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 6, 20,
21 OXN-4, 5, 6,
7, 13, 15, 18,
19, 21
Sea Level Rise OXN-1, 2, 5,
9, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
5, 9, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
5, 9
OXN-1, 2, 3,
5, 9, 21
OXN-2, 3 OXN-1, 2, 3,
5, 9
OXN-1, 2, 3,
5, 9, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
5, 9, 21
Low-Risk Hazards
Drought OXN-5, 11,
21 OXN-21 OXN-2, 5 OXN-2, 5,
11, 21
OXN-5 OXN-2, 3, 5,
11, 21
OXN-2, 3, 5,
11, 21
Wildfire OXN-1, 2, 3,
6 OXN-1, 2, 3,
6 OXN-2, 3, 5,
6, 20
OXN-2, 3, 5,
6 OXN-2, 5, 6,
13 OXN-2, 3, 5,
6 OXN-2, 3, 5,
6, 13
Tsunami OXN-1, 2, 3,
6, 10, 14,
16, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
6, 10, 14,
16, 18, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
6, 10, 12, 13
OXN-1, 2, 3,
6, 10, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
6 10, 13, 14,
16, 18
OXN-1, 2, 3
10, 14, 16,
18 OXN-1, 2, 3,
6, 10, 21
OXN-1, 2, 3,
6, 10, 13, 14,
16, 18, 21
a. See the introduction to this volume for an explanation of mitigation types.

6.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 6-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Item No.7D

6. City of Oxnard
6-23
Table 6-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
Virtual Emergency Preparedness Worship September 16, 2021 70 Adaptation Plan, outreach
Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment Report Results and Adaptation Strategies Workshop
August 9, 2017 Approximately 25
Sea Level Rise Adaptation Strategy Results & Conceptual Policies March 14, 2018 Approximately 25

6.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• City of Oxnard Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • City of Oxnard Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance—The flood damage prevention ordinance was reviewed for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. • City of Oxnard 2021-2026 Five Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP)—The CIP was reviewed for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • Flood Info Community Rating System Website (Ventura County):
https://www.vcfloodinfo.com/programs/flooding-and-flood-risk/vc-flood-history • City of Oxnard Sea Level Rise Atlas: As required by the adopted California Coastal Commission Sea Level Rise Guidance Policy, a risk and vulnerability assessment using the best-available information and science regarding coastal erosion, flooding, wave impacts, tidal inundation and tsunamis is needed to identify potential physical impacts in the City’s coastal zone. In this way, the City can determine what areas are vulnerable to impacts from these five coastal hazards individually and combined, and with projected sea level rise. https://www.oxnard.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/OXNARD- FINAL-LCP-Sea-Level-Rise-
Map-Atlas-Task-2.pdf
• Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment and Fiscal Impact Report: This study included a cost-benefit analysis of the adaptation strategies to allow comparison. The aim of the economic analysis was to provide a common metric against which the trade-offs between the costs and benefits of each adaptation strategy may be evaluated. The analysis accounts for the physical changes, economic benefits, and damages associated with each adaptation strategy, including th
• City of Oxnard Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)—The EOP was used to obtain the listing of official natural hazards that can impact the City, reference materials such as tsunami and dam inundation maps as well emergency management priorities, and public alert and warning procedures.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 6-24

6.11 FUTURE NEEDS TO BETTER UNDERSTAND RISK/VULNERABILITY The City of Oxnard Fire Department is currently developing a Strategic Plan composed of numerous elements including a community risk analysis, infrastructure assessment, and community planning prioritization process. These elements are being created with significant input from key stakeholders including Fire Department personnel, City departments, external agencies, and the residential and business communities. It is anticipated that the Department’s Strategic Plan, anticipated for release in 2022, will strengthen the City’s understanding of risk and vulnerabilities and serve as a foundation for additional hazard mitigation project development during the next planning cycle.

Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
.
!.
.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«
118
¬«
126
¬«
232
¬«1
¬«34
£¤101
£¤
101 !. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Health and Medical
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Oxnard
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!. !.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.!.
!. !. !.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!. !.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«
118
¬«
126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤
101
£¤
101
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Oxnard
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Oxnard
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
012 0.5
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Oxnard
NEHRP Soil Class
±
012 0.5
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
E (Soft clay)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Oxnard
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
012 0.5
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«
118
¬«
126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Oxnard
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Oxnard
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«
118
¬«
126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Oxnard
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Oxnard
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
V (Moderate/Very Light)
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«
118
¬«
126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Oxnard
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
V (Moderate/Very Light)
VI (Strong/Light)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Oxnard
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
012 0.5
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«
118
¬«
126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Oxnard
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
012 0.5
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
OCOF, Esri
Oxnard
Sea Level Rise
of 25 cm (9.8 in.)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Sea Level Rise
Inundation Area
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«118
¬«126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
OCOF, Esri
Oxnard
Sea Level Rise
of 100 cm (39.4 in.)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Sea Level Rise
Inundation Area
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Camarillo
San
Buenaventura
¬«126
¬«
118
¬«
126
¬«
232
¬«
1 ¬«
34 £¤101
£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Oxnard
Tsunami Inudation Zones
±
012 0.5
Miles
Inundation Zones
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Item No.7D

7-1

7. CITY OF PORT HUENEME

7.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Brad Conners, City Manager
250 N. Ventura Road
Port Hueneme, CA 93041
Telephone: 805-986-6501
e-mail Address: [email protected]
Charles Peretz, Deputy City Manager
250 N. Ventura Road
Port Hueneme, CA 93041
Telephone: 805-986-6501
e-mail Address: [email protected]
hueneme.ca.us
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 7-1.

Table 7-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
Don Villafana Public Works Director
Lupe Acero Deputy Finance Director
Andrew Salinas Chief of Police
Tony Stewart Director of Community Development
Scott Matalon Emergency Preparedness Manager
Brad Conners City Manager
Charles Peretz Deputy City Manager

7.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

7.2.1 Location and Features
Port Hueneme is a small coastal town located in Ventura County, just south of the City of Oxnard and east of Channel Islands Harbor. The City is home to Naval Base Ventura County (NBVC) and the Port of Hueneme and about five miles to the south is Naval Air Station Point Mugu. Port Hueneme is primarily built out and has a total land area of 4.5 square miles with a population of 23,647 people.

Regional access to the City is provided by Highway 101 and State Route 1. The City also includes beach front properties, parks, and public beaches visited from residents and non-residents alike.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 7-2

7.2.2 History
The City of Port Hueneme was incorporated on March 24, 1948. The City of Port Hueneme (pronounced “Why-nee-mee”) is a unique community along Ventura County’s Gold Coast just south of the City of Oxnard and Channel Islands Harbor. Port Hueneme is unique because of its rich history, culture, and traditions, dating back to the Chumash Indians who made their home here for centuries and because of its long-established, close relationship with the U.S. Navy’s Port Hueneme and Point Mugu naval facilities.

7.2.3 Governing Body Format
The City of Port Hueneme is governed by a five-member city council. The City consists of six departments: Finance, Housing and Facilities, Community Development, Public Works, Police, and the City Manager’s Office. The City has 2 commissions which report to the City Council. The City currently employs a total of 170 employees (full-time equivalent).

The City Council assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; the City Manager will oversee its implementation.

7.3 CURRENT TRENDS

7.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the City of Port Hueneme as of January 2020 was 23,607. Since 2010, the population has grown at an average annual rate of 0.85 percent.

7.3.2 Development
Anticipated future development for Port Hueneme includes creating and sustaining a strong, viable economic base for the City. The City encourages development of diversified housing types that will meet our community’s needs. This includes establishing a mix of housing types in local neighborhoods to avoid economic stratification and enhance community diversity. Future growth in the City will be managed as identified in the City’s 2045 general plan. City actions, such as those relating to land use, annexations, zoning, subdivision and design review, redevelopment, and capital improvements, must be consistent with the plan.

Table 7-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

7.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

7. City of Port Hueneme
7-3
identified and determined to be feasible, they are included in the action plan. The “Analysis of Mitigation Actions” table in this annex identifies these as community capacity building mitigation actions.

Table 7-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since
the preparation of the previous hazard
mitigation plan?
No
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any
areas during the performance period of this
plan?
No
Are any areas targeted for development or
major redevelopment in the next five years?
Yes
• If yes, briefly describe, including whether
any of the areas are in known hazard risk
areas
Parcel located Victoria and Channel Islands, not in hazard area.

How many permits for new construction
were issued in your jurisdiction since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 0 0 0 0 0
Multi-Family 0 0 0 0 0
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0
Provide the number of new-construction
permits for each hazard area or provide a
qualitative description of where development
has occurred.

From 2016 to current, there have been zero new permits issued as the City of Port Hueneme is built out to capacity.

Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s
buildable lands inventory. If no such
inventory exists, provide a qualitative
description.

99.5%

The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 7-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 7-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 7-5. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 7-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 7-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 7-8. • Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 7-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 7-10.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 7-4
Table 7-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Article 8 Municipal Code starting 8001. (Ord. 637 § 5 Exh. A (part), 2001) “California Building Code”, the “California Residential Building Code”, and the “California Green Building Standards Code”, 2019 Editions Zoning Code Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Article 10 Section 10,000 (Ord. 579 § 6 (1), 1992) Subdivisions Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Article 9, Section 9,000 (Ord. 579 § 5 (1), 1992) Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Follow County’s Reports
Post-Disaster Recovery No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: No Official plan
Real Estate Disclosure Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Report of Building Records. California State Civil Code 1102 requires full disclosure on natural hazard exposure of the sale/re-sale of any and all real property. To be implemented by sellers and realtors.

Growth Management No No No No
Comment: City is built out
Site Plan Review Yes No No Yes
Comment: Section 10350
Environmental Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires state and local agencies to identify the significant environmental impacts of their actions and to avoid or mitigate those impacts, if feasible.

Flood Damage Prevention Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Section 10590
Emergency Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Police Department Emergency Manager
Climate Change No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: In Development
Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? 1998 Not Compliant Comment: 2045 Will Be set for October 2021 Release
Capital Improvement Plan Yes No Yes Yes
How often is the plan updated? 5 years
Comment: Under Development
Disaster Debris Management Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment:

Floodplain or Watershed Plan No Yes Yes/No No
Comment: The Ventura County Watershed Protection creates and maintains countywide plans Stormwater Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Ordinance #775
Urban Water Management Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: City of Port Hueneme Urban Water Management Plan Item No.7D

7. City of Port Hueneme
7-5

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Habitat Conservation Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Local Costal Program
Economic Development Plan No No No No
Comment: No Official
Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: General Plan
Community Wildfire Protection Plan No Yes Yes No
Comment: Not in wildfire area, no current plan
Forest Management Plan No Yes No No
Comment: Urban Forestry
Climate Action Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: In Process for General Plan 2045
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes Comment: EOP Plan Scheduled to finished 12/21
Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) No Yes No No Comment: The County of Ventura has performed a THIRA within the past 5 years. We are currently assessing the timing and requirements for the City of Ventura.

Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: EOP December 2021
Continuity of Operations Plan No Yes/No Yes/No Yes/No
Comment: EOP December 2021
Public Health Plan No Yes No No
Comment: County of Ventura Public Health Department has a plan Other: Tsunami Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The County of Ventura has an existing plan that describes each City role and has been adopted locally. A revision of this document is required within the coming year 2022.

Table 7-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Community Development Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? No Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? Yes

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 7-6
Table 7-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes If yes, specify: Water/Sewer
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds No
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas No
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers No

Table 7-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development
Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works, Charles Cable, Don Villafana Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development and Don Villafana Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: City Contractor
Surveyors No
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications No
Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Emergency and Communications Manager, Police Department Grant writers No

Table 7-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? No Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Facebook Postings
Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Currently re-developing our CERT team.

Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: VC Alert, Everbridge, email, Door Knocking, Website Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: VC Alert
Item No.7D

7. City of Port Hueneme
7-7
Table 7-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Community Dev, PW Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Tony Stewart, Charles Cable Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? 1/21 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meets When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact?
Not had one
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes If no, state why.

Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
No
Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? Yes How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction?a 57 What is the insurance in force? $17,732,000
What is the premium in force? $37,235
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction?a 7 What were the total payments for losses? $846
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Table 7-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 0611158296 N/A
DUNS # Yes 157675430 N/A
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule No N/A N/A Public Protection Yes 03/3X 12/21/2018
Storm Ready Yes N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready Yes N/A N/A

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 7-8
Table 7-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Low Comment: Addressed in 2045 Plan
Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Low Comment: No current ability / Port of Hueneme itself conducts studies and publishes results to public Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Low Comment: No resources identified at this time.

Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory Low Comment: None available at this time
Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Medium Comment: Community Development/Public Works
Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Low Comment: Public Works / Environmental Sustainability
Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes Low Comment: Considerations outlined in General Plan
Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts Low Comment: Continued research for adoption is needed for General Plan Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts High
Comment: The current update to the General plan has addressed strategies for adaptation to impacts.

Champions for climate action in local government departments Low Comment: Local non-profits and groups address issues
Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Medium Comment: City Council is supportive as well as many local organizations Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comment: Non identified, however grants could be looked into Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Low Comment: None that we are aware of at this time
Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Low Comment: Many environmentalists in our community who monitor and report Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Low
Comment: Local residences are concerned with issues and are generally supportive Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: High likelihood to adapt based on our environmental position Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment: None seen.

Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: Not a lot of ecosystems
a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist, but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

Item No.7D

7. City of Port Hueneme
7-9

7.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

7.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• City of Port Hueneme: General Plan
• City of Port Hueneme: Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) • Ventura County: Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan

7.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• City of Port Hueneme: General Plan—This comprehensive effort is underway and will be integrated into this effort to be compliant with AB2140. • City of Port Hueneme: Citizen Emergency Response Team (CERT)—This effort will be a collaboration between the following: CERT volunteers, City staff, community-based organizations, with the existing CERT team manual.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

7.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

7.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 7-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 7-10
Table 7-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Erosion Events N/A Biennially, 2021
most recent
Every two years 2 million cubic yards of sand is dredged from the Port of Hueneme and deposited onto the east side of the Port. This erosion is ongoing and threatens roads and other infrastructure and leads to habitat disruption of local species of birds.

Pandemic
COVID-19
4482-DR January 20, 2020
Continuing
Ongoing
High Wind N/A 2020 Strong surface high pressure in the Great Basin along with strong north to northeast flow aloft generated strong Santa Ana winds across Ventura and Los Angeles counties. North to northeast wind gusts up to 83 mph were reported in the mountains while gusts to 59 mph were reported across the coastal plain.

Wind Event N/A 2018 Strong surface high pressure building in the Great Basin generated strong and gusty Santa Ana winds across sections of Ventura and Los Angeles counties.

Winter Storm N/A 2018 Strong surface high pressure in the Great Basin helped to generate a moderate Santa Ana wind event across Southern California. Strong northeast winds were reported across the mountains and valleys of Ventura and Los Angeles Counties.

Tornado N/A 2018 A powerful winter storm brought significant rain, snow and wind to the area.

Rainfall totals ranged from 1 to 2 inches across coastal and valleys areas with 2 to 4 inches in the foothills and mountains. With snow levels dropping to between 2500 and 3500 feet, significant snowfall was reported in the mountains (up to 1 to 2 feet) and even the Antelope Valley (4 to 8 inches). Numerous road closures due to winter storm conditions were reported, including Interstate 5 through the Grapevine as well as Highways 14 and 138. Additionally, thunderstorms generated a waterspout over the coastal waters as well as a very weak tornado over Ventura Harbor.

Flash Flood N/A 2018 High pressure over the four-corners region resulted in an extended monsoonal flow pattern across Southern California. For several days, strong thunderstorms produced heavy rain, flash flooding and large hail across parts of Southern California.

Debris Flow N/A 2018 A powerful early-season winter storm moves across Southwestern California on Halloween night. The storm produced some significant rainfall with amounts in the coastal areas ranging from 0.25 to 1.50 while the mountains received up to

2.00. In the Camarillo area, near the Springs burn scar, a mud/debris flow occurred. Otherwise just some minor nuisance flooding was reported.

Thunderstorm N/A 2017 A powerful winter storm brought heavy rain and snow, flash flooding and gusty winds to the area. Rainfall totals from this storm generally ranged between 2 and 6 inches with locally higher amounts in some foothill areas. With such rainfall amounts, there was significant snowfall totals in the local mountains with up to 28 inches of snow reported at the resort level. Additionally, the heavy rain did generate several flash flooding events including several mud and debris flows.

High Surf N/A 4/2014 High tides and strong surf damaged the pier, beach and local streets causing road damage, pipe damage and damage to the pier.

Tsunami March 11, 2011 7.1 earthquake in Japan. Damage to local harbors, marinas and docks Tsunami February 27, 2010 8.8 Quake in Chile. Damage to local harbors, marinas and docks Northridge
Earthquake
DR-1008 January
17 – November 30,
1994
Power and communications disruptions, damage to structures St Francis Dam
Disaster
March 12, 1928 $7 Million (1928)—Inundation of nearly the entire city, flooding, debris flows, destruction of infrastructure, high loss of life
Item No.7D

7. City of Port Hueneme
7-11

7.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 7-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Table 7-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Dam Failure 36 High
2 Earthquake 32 Medium
3 Severe Storms 24 Medium
4 Severe Weather 24 Medium
5 Landslide 18 Medium
6 Flooding 15 Low
7 Tsunami 14 Low
8 Drought 9 Low
9 Sea Level Rise 6 Low

7.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of Repetitive-Loss Properties or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: 0
Other Noted Vulnerabilities
The following jurisdiction-specific issues have been identified based on a review of the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, and other available resources:
• Street and Urban Flooding—There are numerous areas of the city that flood to varying degrees during periods of high rain. The effects of this flooding range from street closures to damage to property, vehicles and buildings.
• Power Outages/Emergency Power—Local power outages have resulted from high winds and storm conditions as well as from the effects of wildland fire in the region. Many key city buildings including the Main City Hall and Council Chambers buildings have no backup power or emergency generators.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 7-12
• Debris Flows- Following heavy rains and winter storms, substantial debris flows have occurred in the Santa Clara River, Ventura River, as well as local streams and culverts. Debris flows following wildland fires are particularly bad and can require removal of material from streams, streets, culverts and beaches.
• Liquefaction Potential—Nearly the entire City of Port Hueneme is in a “Liquefaction Zone”.

The effects and damage caused by seismic activities can be amplified resulting in increased damage to buildings and infrastructure.
• Homeless Population- A significant number of persons commonly defined as “Homeless” live on and around our local beach. During high tides and significant tidal pushes, the homeless are at greater risk.
• Tsunami Awareness and Notification—Port Hueneme has many visitors to its beach who may not be aware of the tsunami risk. The City does not have tsunami warning sirens. • Wildfire Smoke—During wildfire events in the region the air quality in the City can become hazardous, especially when the Santa Ana winds push wildfire smoke toward the coast. Wildfire can trigger PSPS events, which amplify the hazard when city buildings lacking backup power cannot operate air conditioning systems.

Actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

7.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 7-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Table 7-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 6—Develop a public outreach program that informs property owners located in the dam and levee failure inundation areas about voluntary flood insurance.  PHE-7
Comment: Action status unknown due to staff turnover
OA 10—Seismically retrofit or upgrade seismically deficient government facilities and pre-identified shelter facilities.
 PHE-1
Comment: Not completed due to lack of funding and staff capacity OA 11—Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.
 PHE-9
Comment: Action status unknown due to staff turnover
OA 13—Reinforce roads/bridges from flooding through protection activities, including elevating the roads/bridges and installing/widening culverts beneath the roads/bridges or upgrading storm drains.
 PHE-10
Comment: City does not have bridges but storm drain upgrades are in process in the location of the beach. Continued work needs to continue on other parts of the city.

OA 18—Continue to participate in the NWS TsunamiReady Program through continued implementation of Guideline 4: Community Preparedness measures, including public outreach material and curriculum.
 PHE-11
Comment: Continued participation in the program
Item No.7D

7. City of Port Hueneme
7-13

7.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 7-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 7-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 7-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Table 7-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency
Support
Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action PHE-1—Mitigate beach erosion to protect shoreline roads, properties, harbor facilities, and the natural habitat, including endangered species.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami, Severe Storms New & Existing 2, 13, 14, 18 USACE Public Works Medium General Funds, FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP)
Ongoing
Action PHE-2—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami Existing 1, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 16 Public Works Community
Development
High FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP)
Short-term
Action PHE-3—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including shoreline development.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami, Drought
New & Existing 1, 2, 10, 11, 12, 15,
16, 19
Community Development Public Works Low Staff Time, General Funds
Ongoing
Action PHE-4—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 15,
17, 19
Community Development Public Works Low Staff Time, General Funds
Short-term
Action PHE-5—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11,
13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19
Public Works Low Staff Time, General
Funds
Ongoing
Action PHE-6—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including but not limited to the following:
• Adopt a Climate Action Plan to reflect new State legislation, changing priorities, and environmental sustainability and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies and goals.
• Adopt modifications to existing plans and procedures to meet climate change issues and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami, Drought New & Existing 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, 19
Community Development Public Works Low Staff Time, General Funds
Short-term
Action PHE-7—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power, including the Emergency Operations Center and other critical facilities throughout the city.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Severe Weather, Tsunami, Wildfire Existing 1, 2, 7, 10 Public Works City Manager Medium General Funds, FEMA

HMA (BRIC, HMGP)
Long-term
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 7-14
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency
Support
Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action PHE-8—Develop a public outreach program that informs property owners located in the dam and levee failure inundation areas about voluntary flood insurance.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami Existing 1, 2, 7, 10, 17, 19 Community Development Low Staff Time/ General Funds
Short-Term
Action PHE-9-– Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
Existing 1, 2, 7, 10, 17, 19 Community Development Public Works Low Staff Time / General Fund Short-Term Action PHE-10—Reinforce roads from flooding through protection activities, including elevating the roads and installing/widening culverts beneath the roads/bridges or upgrading storm drains.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flood, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami Existing 2, 4, 6, 9, 11 Public Works Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Long-Term
Action PHE-11—Continue to participate in the NWS TsunamiReady and StormReady Programs through continued implementation of Guideline 4: Community Preparedness measures, including public outreach material and curriculum.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flood, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 12, 17,
18, 19
Public Works Low General Funds Ongoing
Action PHE-12—Install City tsunami warning siren network.

Hazards Mitigated: Tsunami
New & Existing 1, 2, 7 Public Works Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Short-Term
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Table 7-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
1 4 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
2 7 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
3 8 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
4 9 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
5 13 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
6 11 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Medium
7 4 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
8 6 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
9 6 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
10 5 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
11 9 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Medium
12 3 Medium Medium Yes Yes No Medium Medium
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Item No.7D

7. City of Port Hueneme
7-15
Table 7-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
Dam Failure PHE-5 PHE-2 PHE-8 PHE-7 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 5, 6 Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake PHE-2 PHE-9 PHE-7 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 6
Severe Storms PHE-5 PHE-2, 10 PHE-8 PHE-1 PHE-10 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 5, 6, 11 Severe Weather PHE-5 PHE-2, 10 PHE-8 PHE-7 PHE-10 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 5, 6, 11 Landslide PHE-2 PHE-7 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 6
Low-Risk Hazards
Flooding PHE-5 PHE-2, 10 PHE-8 PHE-1 PHE-7 PHE-10 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 5, 6, 11 Tsunami PHE-5, 12 PHE-2, 10 PHE-8, 12 PHE-1 PHE-7, 12 PHE-10 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 5, 6, 11 Drought PHE-2 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 6
Sea Level Rise PHE-5 PHE-2, 10 PHE-8 PHE-1 PHE-6 PHE-3, 4, 5, 6, 11 a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

7.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 7-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Table 7-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
Social media and website ( in coordination with General Plan) 9-02 45

7.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• City of Port Hueneme Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • City of Port Hueneme General Plan—The General Plan is under revision and had been aligned to be compliant with AB2140. It was reviewed for the capability assessment and action plan development.

The following outside resources and references were reviewed:

Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex Development Toolkit—The toolkit was used to support the identification of past hazard events and noted vulnerabilities, the risk ranking, and the development of the mitigation action plan.

Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
.
!.
!.

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
!. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Safety and Security
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Port Hueneme
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!. !.!.!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!. !. !.
!.
!. !. !. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Port Hueneme
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Port Hueneme
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Port Hueneme
NEHRP Soil Class
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
D (Stiff soil)
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Port Hueneme
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Port Hueneme
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Port Hueneme
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Port Hueneme
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Port Hueneme
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Port Hueneme
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
V (Moderate/Very Light)
VI (Strong/Light)
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Port Hueneme
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Port Hueneme
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
OCOF, Esri
Port Hueneme
Sea Level Rise
of 25 cm (9.8 in.)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Sea Level Rise
Inundation Area
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
OCOF, Esri
Port Hueneme
Sea Level Rise
of 100 cm (39.4 in.)
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Sea Level Rise
Inundation Area
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Oxnard
Port Hueneme
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Port Hueneme
Tsunami Inudation Zones
±
0 0.35 0.70.175
Miles
Inundation Zones
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

8-1

8. CITY OF SANTA PAULA

8.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Scott Varner, Support Services Commander
214 S. 10th Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
805-525-4474 ext. 105
[email protected]
Kate Bader, CSO
214 S. 10th Street
Santa Paula, CA 93060
805-525-4474 ext. 113
[email protected]
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 8-1.

Table 8-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
Dan Singer City Manager
James Mason Community & Economic Development Director
Jeff Mitchem Planning Manager
Tom Tarantino Associate Planner
Alexander Wallsten Administrative Analyst

8.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

8.2.1 Location and Features
The City of Santa Paula is in Ventura County, California, United States.

The current boundaries generally extend out from 34.3542° N, 119.0593° W, encompassing an area of

5.69 square miles.

The City of Santa Paula, California is located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and 14 miles east of Ventura and the coastline of the Pacific Ocean. Santa Paula is near the geographical center of Ventura County, situated in the rich agricultural Santa Clara River Valley. The City is surrounded by rolling hills and rugged mountain peaks in addition to orange, lemon, and avocado groves. In fact, Santa Paula is referred to as the “Citrus Capital of the World.”
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-2

8.2.2 History
The city of Santa Paula was incorporated in 1902. The original community that has become known as Santa Paula was established by the Chumash Indians as the villages of Mupu and Srswa. The land was later given away as part of a Spanish land grant to Rancho Santa Paula and Saticoy in 1840. In the 1860s the area was subdivided into small farms. In 1880, oil was discovered in Santa Paula leading to the formation of the Union Oil Company in 1890. The City of Santa Paula was incorporated on April 22, 1902. In the early 1900s Santa Paula was considered the pre-Hollywood film capital, the “Queen of the Silver Screen.” Even today, Santa Paula is noted for its movie personalities (silent and sound) who resided in and adjacent to the city and a TV or movie crew is not an unusual sight in the community.

8.2.3 Governing Body Format
The City of Santa Paula assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; the City Manager will oversee its implementation.

The City of Santa Paula is governed by a five-member city council. The City consists of eight departments: Administration, City Clerk, Community and Economic Development, Finance, Human Resources, Parks & Recreation, Police, and Public Works. The city has 10 commissions and task forces, which report to the City Council. The City currently employs a total of 126 employees, 98 of which are full-time.

8.3 CURRENT TRENDS

8.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the Santa Paula as of January 2020 was 30,389. Since 2010, the population has grown at an average annual rate of 0.27 percent.

8.3.2 Development
Development interest in Santa Paula has greatly increased in recent years, particularly since construction began on the highly visible East Area 1 / Harvest at Limoneira project. As Santa Paula is surrounded by a mix of greenbelt and urban curb restrictions, the majority of development proposals are for infill and adaptive reuse projects—areas where Santa Paula offers numerous opportunities.

Recent legislation aimed at streamlining the entitlement process for housing projects has also generated a great deal of interest from developers.

Table 8-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-3
Table 8-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan?
No
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any areas during the performance period of this plan?
Yes, Santa Paula West Business Park
If yes, describe land areas and dominant uses. The Santa Paula West Business Park is located on 53 acres of agricultural land, currently zoned AE-40 (Agricultural Exclusive, 40 acre minimum parcel size) in the County of Ventura, on the southwestern boundary of the City of Santa Paula. It is bound to the north by Telegraph Road and residential property (zoned MHP and R-2), to the east by existing industrial and commercial development (zoned CG and C-LI), to the south by agriculture (zoned AE 40 in the County of Ventura) and to the west by the Adams Creek and agriculture (zoned AE-40 in the County of Ventura).

The area is identified as SP-6, West Area 2 in the City of Santa Paula’s General Plan. It is within the Sphere of Influence and the city urban restriction boundary of the City of Santa Paula with frontage along State Route 126 and Telegraph Road and is bisected by the railroad right-of- way. While it is just west of the Santa Paula City limits, the area is outside of the Santa Paula -Ventura Greenbelt. Annexation of the Santa Paula West Business Park into the City of Santa Paula has been approved by the City Council, and is currently under review by Ventura County LAFCo.

East Area 1 / Harvest at Limoneira—500-acres on eastern end of the City.

Remaining 1,100 homes (of approved 1,500) to be constructed under adopted Specific Plan, along with commercial areas and park facilities.

Hazard mitigation included in EA1 Specific Plan (SP-3)/EIR.

How many permits for new construction were issued in
your jurisdiction since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 4 10 2 41 174
Multi-Family 8 0 11 0 0
Other (commercial, mixed
use, etc.)
1 2 1 1 0
Total 13 12 14 42 174
Provide the number of new-construction permits for each hazard area or provide a qualitative description of where development has occurred.

Hillside residences along northerly city boundary are either within or abutting high-fire risk areas as defined by CAL FIRE/VCFPD. Residences and businesses, including a portion of those in the new East Area 1/Harvest at Limoneira development, on the east end of the city are within FEMA flood hazard areas of Santa Paula Creek and/or Santa Clara River.

These flood/liquefaction hazards have been mitigated by requirements of applicable Specific Plan(s) or development conditions.

Describe the level of buildout in the jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s buildable lands inventory. If no such inventory exists, provide a qualitative description.

Santa Paula is largely built-out within city limits. Remaining pockets of developable land within city limits are situated near the southeast and southwest corners. These areas either have development proposals (with hazard mitigation) under review, or an adopted Specific Plan (also including hazard mitigation).

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-4

8.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Findings of the capability assessment were reviewed to identify opportunities to expand, initiate or integrate capabilities to further hazard mitigation goals and objectives. Where such opportunities were identified and determined to be feasible, they are included in the action plan. The “Analysis of Mitigation Actions” table in this annex identifies these as community capacity building mitigation actions. The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 8-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 8-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 8-5. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 8-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 8-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 8-8. • Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 8-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 8-10.

Table 8-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes No Yes No
Comment: 2019 California Building Code
Zoning Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 16
Subdivisions Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: State Subdivision Map Act
COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 16.80 Subdivision Regulations Stormwater Management Yes No Yes No
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 54
Post-Disaster Recovery Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 150
Real Estate Disclosure Yes No Yes No
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 156.043
Growth Management Yes No Yes No
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 16.106 (7-19-04)
Site Plan Review Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 16.226
Environmental Protection Yes No Yes No
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter
Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-5

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Flood Damage Prevention Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Municipal Code, Chapter 151
Emergency Management Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Emergency Operations Plan 2019
Climate Change Yes No Yes No
Comment: COSP 2040 General Plan 4-6 Environmental and Cultural Resources, C. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? Yes
Comment: COSP 2040 General Plan
Capital Improvement Plan Yes No Yes Yes
How often is the plan updated? Annually (Five Years)
Comment: California Government Code §65103(c); COSP 2040 General Plan Disaster Debris Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Ventura County Disaster Recovery Plan, Adopted by BOS in April 2019 Floodplain or Watershed Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: The City participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Stormwater Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: Ventura County Storm Water Quality Management Program, COSP 2024 General Plan 4-6 Environmental and Cultural Resources, H. Water Quality
Urban Water Management Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: COSP 2020 Urban Water Management Plan
Habitat Conservation Plan No No No Yes
Comment: N/A
Economic Development Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: City Council Strategic Goals Approved July 2021//Economic Development Strategic Plan under development Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: N/A
Community Wildfire Protection Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Emergency Operations Plan 2019, Section 8, Threat Assessments 8—Wildland Fire Forest Management Plan No Unknown Unknown Yes
Comment: No forest area, unknown on plans or jurisdiction if required.

Climate Action Plan No Unknown Unknown Yes
Comment: N/A
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: COSP Emergency Operations Plan 2019
Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) Yes No Yes No Comment: COSP Emergency Operations Plan 2019
Section 8, Threat Summary and Assessments
Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Emergency Operations Plan 2019
Continuity of Operations Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Emergency Operations Plan 2019 Part one-35 Public Health Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: COSP Emergency Operations Plan 2019 addressed Public Health Emergencies, County of Ventura Health Care Agency Public Health Emergency Response Plan (ERP)

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-6
Table 8-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Building and Safety Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? Yes Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? Currently being developed

Table 8-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes If yes, specify: Water and Sewer
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds No
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas No
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes

Table 8-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/Assistant City Engineer/Community Development /Director & Manager Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/City Engineer Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards No Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis No
Surveyors No
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Planning Department / Associate Planner Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Scott Varner, Commander, Santa Paula PD Grant writers No

Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-7
Table 8-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? No If yes, briefly describe: Will be in development
Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: In process of developing education Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Although not a decision making body, the Citizen Corp meets monthly Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Social Media, Nixle
Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: 1610 AM, Social Media, County reverse 911, Nixle

Table 8-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Public Works/Public Works Director Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? No What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? May 4, 2009 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meets If exceeds, in what ways? Enter Response
When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact?
June 18, 2018
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
If so, state what they are. Enter Response
Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No If so, state what they are. Enter Response
Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? No If no, state why. The current FIRM’s received from FEMA are being appealed for a variety of reasons, including significant A99 zones within the City’s jurisdictional boundary. The City will be conducting its own flood study in the coming months.

Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
No
If so, what type of assistance/training is needed? Enter Response Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? Yes How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction?a 1,021 What is the insurance in force? $306,954,400
What is the premium in force? $604,233
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction?a 63 What were the total payments for losses? $134,387
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-8
Table 8-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 0611170042 N/A
DUNS # Yes 085937027 N/A
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Yes Unknown Unknown Public Protection Yes 03/3X 12/21/2018
Storm Ready N/A N/A N/A
Firewise N/A N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready N/A N/A N/A

Table 8-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Medium Comment: City’s General Plan acknowledges understanding of potential climate change impacts. The City does not currently have an adaptation plan. However, per the General Plan, the City has policies and procedures that will be in force for future developments, entailing strict rules that will not allow for development or construction in high risk wildfire and flood areas, respectively (HPS 2.1 & 3.1). The City’s Storm Drain Master Plan was also created to address deficiencies in existing drainage systems and identify proposed facilities needed to address deficiencies. The City also participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (HPS 2.2) which covers over 1,000 residences and has CIPs addressing potential climate change hazards such as the Water Recycling Facility Floodwall, project #9039, funded through SB1.

Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Low Comment: City itself does not have a committee or task force that monitors climate change impacts. The City does however make informed decisions based on risk zones identified by external sources, such as FEMA, CAL Fire, Ventura County Fire, and USGS. The City updates risk zones as new data is supplied by these external sources and applies the updated information to future decision-making and land use.

Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Low Comment: City does not have any resources specifically dedicated to climate change impacts. City works in collaboration with Ventura County Watershed Protection to protect watercourses, public highways, life, and property from damage or destruction from floodwaters, and Ventura County Fire District in efforts to mitigate future fire risks as guided by the Ventura County Unit Strategic Fire Plan.

Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory Low Comment: City does not have resources dedicated to greenhouse gas inventory. City would cooperate with Ventura County Air Pollution Control District under guidelines imposed by AB 617 to develop and implement emissions reporting, monitoring, and reduction plans and measures.

Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Medium Comment: City’s General Plan outlines policies and procedures that will be in force for future development that bars construction in designated high risk zones, and for other developments outside those zones requires current Federal, State, and City parameters be met during construction (HPS 2.1 & 3.1). The City has been informed of risk zones as have been identified in FEMA’s Flood Hazard Zones map (2018), Ventura County’s Countywide Dam Failure Inundation Areas map (2014), Santa Paula Safety Element Fire History map (2015) detailing Wildland Fire History, and CAL Fire’s Wildland Fire Hazard Areas (2020) detailing fire risk zones in the Santa Paula area.

Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Low Comment: City complies with Ventura County ordinances and participates in the Ventura County Watershed Protection Program to protect watercourses and property from damage or destruction from floodwaters and the Ventura County Unit Strategic Fire Plan to mitigate future fire risks.

Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-9
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes Low Comment: City does not have a direct mandate that states decision-making must consider climate change impacts. Notwithstanding, the City’s General Plan outlines policies and procedures for future development and CIPs that take into account and seek to mitigate climate change hazards. City Council meets every other week and is open to the public to vote on city budgetary and CIP related issues. The Public Works Director is present to provide and inform Council and the public of climate related information as it pertains to project proposals and budge dispensations.

Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts Low Comment: City is in the process of exploring EV technology options and allowing third party alternative energy companies licenses to operate to install and maintain EV charging stations and solar panels.

Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Medium
Comment: City General Plan outlines risk zones and policies for development going forward. Land use policies outlined will bar new development in areas deemed high risk flood zones or high risk wildfire zones (HPS 2.1 & 3.1). The General Plan outlines CIPs to be developed and funded that address climate induced hazards related to flooding (HPS 2.c), programs to be .

Champions for climate action in local government departments Low Comment: City does not have a dedicated department or staff to climate action initiatives. Although there are no direct committees dedicated to this task, Public Works is focused on complying with federal, state, and county regulations. PW has developed a General Plan that acknowledges and plans around known risk zones with the goal of mitigating future hazards and restricting further development into high risk zones.

Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Medium Comment: City Council is on board with climate change adaptation projects if they are projects that would reduce energy usage and increase energy efficiency. An Energy Efficiency Program will go before Council in Dec 2021 to vote on energy programs to implement. Council members are supportive of projects and initiatives if they will provide the community with a measurable return value or if they will directly aid further development of the city.

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comment: City does not allocate resources specifically to climate change adaptation projects. Portions of the budget may be spent on future CIPs related to climate change adaptation.

Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Medium Comment: City has emergency shelters in place that have basic resources that have been used in the recent past during the Thomas Fire. Santa Paula Police have developed evacuation protocols that are enacted when necessary and in coordination with Ventura County Office of Emergency Services and Ventura County Human Services Agency.

Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Medium Comment: The City does not currently send out informational media content related to climate risks. City residents pay into the National Flood Insurance Program and are aware of the potential flood risks in their area.

Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comment: Residents are supportive of adaptation efforts that directly benefit them. Residents may not be as supportive if these adaptation efforts were to take funding from projects that would impact them in a short term time frame, such as repaving of streets that are in a state of disrepair.

Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment: The City’s per capita income is 68% of the national, and the poverty rate is greater than the national average at 14.2% (Census Bureau). Residents have a limited capacity for adaptation and are reliant upon the city to make preparations and fund projects that would mitigate climate induced hazards such as floods or wildfires.

Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment: Scope of climate impact will dictate the economy’s capacity to adapt. Based on FEMA’s updated Ventura County flood maps for communities along Santa Clara River the base floodplain level has risen and portions of the city south of Hwy 126 now exist in a FEMA identified base floodplain zone. Significant portions of the city to the west and east of Santa Paula Creek as well as to the north of Hwy 126 fall within a federally protected A99 zone having met specific requirements. The breaking of the one of four dams located northeast of the city could incur significant cost damages. Also the breaking of a levee could incur damages and rebuilding of said levee would require significant public funding that may not be readily reallocated.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-10
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment: The local ecosystem consists largely of the Santa Clara River watershed which is protected in cooperation with Ventura County Watershed Protection. Wildfires have burned through the foothills to the north and east of the city, including the Thomas Fire (2017) and Simi Fire (2003), respectively. Extensive research and study has not been conducted to ascertain the long-term ecosystem damage or recovery of the region. a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist, but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

8.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

8.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• 2040 General Plan—four-year update process recently completed (late 2021). • Draft Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) and Water Shortage Contingency Plan— updated documents in final stages of review.

8.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• 2029 Housing Element—draft HE Update currently under review w/CA HCD Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-11

8.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

8.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 8-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Table 8-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Thomas Fire FM-5224 2017 281,893 acres burned over the course of 38 days across the Santa Barbara and Ventura Counties. 280 structures were damaged and 1,063 structures were destroyed.

Residents were evacuated and significant smoke covered the area. A hazard shelter was set up with basic resources in Santa Paula for evacuees.

Simi Fire N/A 2003 108,204 acres burned over the course of 10 days in the Simi Valley. Significant smoke billowed over the valley.11 structures were damaged, 315 structures destroyed, 21 injuries. No property damages in Santa Paula.

Maria Fire FM-5302 November 1,
2019
9,999 acres burned over 5 days. 4 structures were destroyed. Residents were evacuated and diverted by Santa Paula PD. Significant smoke lingering causing respiratory irritation.

Flash Flood N/A January 4,
2008
Rainfall totals between January 4th and 6th ranged from 5 to 11 inches in the foothills and mountains. The total amount of rainfall, combined with rainfall rates around 1 inch per hour, produced numerous reports of flooding as well as mud and debris flows.

SC River
Flood/SP Airport
DR-1585 2005 Flooding closed all ingress and egress from the city. Santa Paula airport was closed for several months due to flood damage to the runway--southern portion of the airport and runway was washed away by flood waters.

Flash Flood N/A November
30, 2002
An intense thunderstorm produced heavy rain and flash flooding near the community of Santa Paula. Law enforcement officials reported the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Briggs Road as well as the intersection of Telegraph Road and Briggs Road were inundated with over 2 feet of water.

Wildfire N/A December
25, 2000
Gusty Santa Ana winds fueled a wildfire in the hills between the cities of Santa Paula and Somis. The fire, which burned over 360 acres, was started by downed power lines.

Northridge
Earthquake
DR-1008 1994 6.7 magnitude earthquake centered in Northridge. 57 fatalities reported during caused by earthquake with injuries over the thousands. Damages caused were over $20 billion in costs with double that in economic loss. Marked the costliest earthquake in U.S. history.

SC River Flood DR-253 1969 13 reported deaths. 5 bridge crossings destroyed. Property damage was estimated at $60 million.

St. Francis Dam
Flood
N/A 1928 Countywide, more than 530 people died; bridges, orchards, farms, homes all eradicated in flood’s path down the Santa Clara river valley to the Pacific Ocean.

8.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 8-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-12
Table 8-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Flooding 48 High
2 Dam Failure 36 High
3 Earthquake 32 Medium
4 Severe Storms 24 Medium
5 Severe Weather 24 Medium
6 Landslide 18 Medium
7 Wildfire 12 Low
8 Drought 9 Low

8.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 3 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of Repetitive-Loss Properties or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: 0
Other Noted Vulnerabilities
No jurisdiction-specific issues were identified by the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, or other available resources.

8.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 8-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

8.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 8-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 8-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 8-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-13
Table 8-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 6—Develop a public outreach program that informs property owners located in the dam and levee failure inundation areas about voluntary flood insurance.  SP-4
Comment: Ongoing initiative, Public Works
OA 7—Develop a water conservation public outreach program to increase awareness about the drought, fines and penalties for overuse and solutions for conserving water.
 SP-11
Comment: Ongoing initiative, Public Works
OA 11—Develop and implement plans to increase the building owner’s general knowledge of and appreciation for the value of seismic upgrading of the building’s structural and nonstructural elements.
 SP-1
Comment: Ongoing initiative, Building & Safety / Public Works OA 14—Acquire, relocate, or elevate residential structures, in particular those that have been identified as RL properties, within the 100-year floodplain.  SP-1
Comment: Ongoing initiative, Public Works

Table 8-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action SP-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Landslide, Wildfire Existing 2, 6, 9, 10, 11 City of Santa
Paula
None High FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
PDM and HMGP)
Short-term
Action SP-2—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including the East Area 1 development.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Landslide, Wildfire, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
17, 19
City of Santa
Paula
None Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action SP-3—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Dam Failure, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Landslide, Wildfire, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11,
12, 13, 14, 15
City of Santa
Paula
None Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term
Action SP-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 6, 7, 17 City of Santa
Paula
None Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-14
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action SP-5—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including but not limited to the following:
• Outlining floodplains and identifying areas under threat of liquefaction and subsidence that border the Santa Clara River Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Wildfire, Drought New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,
10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 19
City of Santa
Paula
VCPWA-WP Low FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time, General
Funds
Short-term
Action SP-6—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power, including City Hall, Police Station, Community Center, City facilities yards, water pumping stations, sewer lift stations.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Landslide, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Wildfire Existing 2, 19 City of Santa
Paula
High FEMA HMA (BRIC and
HMGP), Staff Time, General
Funds
Short-term
Action SP-7—Policies and procedures (HPS 1.1-4 & HPS 1.a-i) to reduce severity and damage caused by geologic hazards, including seismic upgrade of unreinforced masonry buildings as required by State regulations, annual review of building codes to ensure State codes are used in reviewing development proposals, establishing of geotechnical investigation standards and requirements to be followed by development applicants
Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11,
12, 16
City of Santa
Paula
None Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, HMGP),
Staff Time & General Funds
Ongoing
Action SP-8—Policies and procedures (HPS 2.1-6 & HPS 2.a-f) to address dam failure and storm water flood hazards, including but not limited to flood hazard mitigation planning that locates development areas where such risk can be mitigated to acceptable levels, locating development for any new public or emergency facilities outside flood hazard zones, participation in the National Flood Insurance Program and the Community Rating System to ensure the city is incentivized to reduce risk of damage from flooding and improve flood preparedness, support of flood control projects on the Santa Clara River, Santa Paula Creek, and other waterways, inter-agency cooperation with Army Corps of Engineers and VCPWA-WP
Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Dam Failure
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11,
12, 16
City of Santa
Paula
VCPWA-WP Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Ongoing
Action SP-9—Policies and procedures (HPS 3.1-4 & HPS 3.a-i) to address risk of wildland fire including but not limited to locating development in areas where wildland fire risks can be mitigated to an acceptable level, locating new public and emergency facilities outside high fire hazard zones, enforcement of new State fire safe and defensible space regulations and standards (Public Resource Code Sec. 4290-4291 and Government Code Sec. 51182), ensuring adequate water supply for firefighting is available in all new development, consideration of a future fire station along the urban wildland interface along State Route 150, identification of effective methods to establish buffer zones separating residential development in foothills from chaparral and other native vegetation.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11,
12, 16
City of Santa
Paula
Ventura County Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMAP
and HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Ongoing
Action SP-10—Maintain wildfire hazard fuel reduction program for areas that have been identified with overgrown or dead brush, trees and weeds to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program. (Coordinates with VCFPD Action VFP-6) Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11,
13, 14, 15, 18, 19
VCFPD

City of Santa
Paula, CAL FIRE &
USDA
Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMAP
and HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Ongoing
Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-15
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action SP-11—Continue developing the water conservation public outreach program to increase awareness about the drought, fines and penalties for overuse and solutions for conserving water.

Hazards Mitigated: Drought
New & Existing 2, 12, 14, 16, 17 City of Santa
Paula
None Low Staff Time & General Funds Ongoing
Action SP-12—Determine feasibility of the City of Santa Paula joining the Community Rating System (CRS) program to enhance public safety, reduce flood damage to property and infrastructure, and reduce flood insurance rates in the community.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 2, 19 City of Santa
Paula
None Low Staff Time & General Funds Short-term
Action SP-13—Water Recycling Facility Floodwall. Construct a Floodwall to protect the Water Recycling Facility, as required by FEMA.

The project will cost an estimated $550,000 with funds fully secured from the Sewer budget.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
Existing 2, 6, 11 City of Santa
Paula
None High FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Short-term
Action SP-14—Water Main Replacement Program. Replace water mains deficient in capacity and not up to current seismic standards, as outlined in the City’s Potable Water System Master Plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Storms
Existing 2, 6, 9, 11, 19 City of Santa
Paula
None Low Sewer Budget, FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Ongoing
Action SP-15—Construct an Advanced Reverse Osmosis Treatment Facility. The project is part of a mandate by the Los Angeles Area Regional Water Quality Board to construct a recycled water delivery system to be completed no later than May 1, 2022. A Water Discharge Permit was issued to the city Feb. 8, 2019, covering a 10-year period with mandated milestones. The City completed infrastructure design, CEQA/Permitting, and additional Administrative/Financing in the amount of $1,490,000 in FY 2019/2020 for the proposed transmission line, as required by the LARWQCB in the Waste Discharge Requirements and Cease and Desist Order. Funding partially (43%) secured through Sewer budget.

Hazards Mitigated: Drought
New & Existing 2, 3, 8, 14 City of Santa
Paula
None Medium Sewer Budget, FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Short-term
Action SP-16—Well Rehabilitation Program. Rehabilitate groundwater wells [18, 11, 12, 13, 14] as recommended by the City’s Potable Water System Master Plan. The Decant Pump will require rebuilding or replacement of one well per year. Funding is fully secured through Water Department budget from FY 2021/2022 to FY 2025/2026.

Hazards Mitigated: Drought
Existing 2, 3, 14, 19 City of Santa
Paula
None Low Sewer Budget, FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Short-term
Action SP-17—Water Recycling Facility Capital Expenditures. Replacement of or plant improvements to critical equipment for the Water Recycling Facility. Past emergency events have identified a need to upgrade and raise elevation of the motor control center and improve water pump and wastewater processing operation sustainability during emergency events and power outage. Funding is fully secured through Sewer budget.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Drought
Existing 2, 3, 11, 14 City of Santa
Paula
None Low Sewer Budget, FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Ongoing
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-16
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action SP-18—FEMA Floodplain Restudy. Develop alternative floodplain study with associated hydrologic and hydraulic analysis to address deficiencies in current FEMA study in key areas of the City. This project will take 6 months to complete and will provide specific detail that builds upon the more general countywide study that was performed by Ventura County.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 1, 8, 19 City of Santa
Paula
None High FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Short-term
Action SP-19—Foothill/Cameron Drainage Improvements. Construct drainage and retaining wall improvements to address safety issues at intersection. Construct: approximately 75’ of a 6’ maximum height retaining wall to match existing adjacent wall along Foothill Dr; debris inlet and associated piping to address drainage and debris flows from steep adjacent agricultural property. Remove existing concrete barrier from roadway and restore two-way vehicular travel. This area has been identified as a critically affected area during flooding events.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
Existing 6, 11, 14, 18 City of Santa
Paula
None Low FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA,
HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Short-term
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Table 8-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
1 5 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
2 16 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
3 12 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
4 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
5 17 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
6 2 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
7 9 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
8 9 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
9 10 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
10 12 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
11 5 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
12 3 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
13 3 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
14 5 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
15 4 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
16 4 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
17 4 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
18 3 Medium High Yes Yes No Medium High
19 4 High Low Yes Yes No Medium High
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Item No.7D

8. City of Santa Paula
8-17
Table 8-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
Flooding SP-2, 4, 8 SP-1, 8, 17 SP-6 SP-8, 13, 14,
19 SP-5, 17 SP-2, 3, 4, 8,
12, 18
Dam Failure SP-2, 8 SP-1, 8 SP-6 SP-8 SP-2, 3, 8
Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake SP-2, 7 SP-1, 7 SP-6 SP-14 SP-2, 3, 7
Severe Storms SP-2 SP-1 SP-6 SP-14 SP-5 SP-2, 3
Severe Weather SP-2 SP-1 SP-6 SP-5 SP-2, 3
Landslide SP-2 SP-1 SP-6 SP-2, 3
Low-Risk Hazards
Wildfire SP-2, 9 SP-1 SP-9, 10 SP-6 SP-5 SP-2, 3, 9
Drought SP-2 SP-11 SP-15 SP-5, 15, 16,
17 SP-2, 3
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

8.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 8-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Table 8-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
Seismic Upgrade Handouts/Guides, Building & Safety Ongoing Citywide Water Conservation Handouts/Guides, Building & Safety Ongoing Citywide Participant, California State ‘Save Our Water’ Program Ongoing Citywide

8.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• City of Santa Paula Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • City of Santa Paula Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance—The flood damage prevention ordinance was reviewed for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. • City of Santa Paula 2040 General Plan—The 2040 General Plan (focusing on Section 5, Hazards & Public Safety Element) was reviewed for opportunities for action plan integration. 2040-General-Plan-Section-5---Hazards-and-Public-Safety-Element (spcity.org) Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 8-18
• City of Santa Paula Fiscal Year 2021/2022 & 2022/2023 Proposed Budget—The budget was reviewed for capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration.

Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
!. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Health and Medical
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Santa Paula
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«126
¬«
126
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Santa Paula
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Santa Paula
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Santa Paula
NEHRP Soil Class
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Santa Paula
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Santa Paula
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Santa Paula
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Santa Paula
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Santa Paula
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Santa Paula
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Santa Paula
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Santa Paula
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Santa Paula
¬«150
¬«
126
¬«
126
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CAL FIRE, Esri
Santa Paula
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
±
0 0.45 0.90.225
Miles
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Item No.7D

9-1

9. CITY OF SIMI VALLEY

9.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Eileen Connors, Emergency Services Manager
3901 Alamo Street
Simi Valley, CA 93063
Telephone: 805-583-6982
e-mail Address: [email protected]
Sean Gibson, Deputy ES Director/City
Planner
2929 Tapo Canyon Rd.

Simi Valley, CA 93063
Telephone: 805-583-6383
email Address: [email protected]
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 9-1.

Table 9-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
Chris Oberender Deputy Public Works Director
Brent Siemer Deputy Public Works Director
Samantha Argabrite Deputy City Manager, City Manager’s Office Sean Gibson Deputy ES Director/City Planner, Planning
Eileen Connors Emergency Services Manager
Alison Phagan Deputy Director, Administrative Services
Marvin Lopez Administrative Services
Jeff Pike Ventura County Fire Dept.

9.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

9.2.1 Location and Features
The City of Simi Valley is in southeast Ventura County.

The current boundaries generally extend from the Santa Susana Mountains in the north to the Simi Hills in the south and east to the San Fernando Valley, encompassing an area of forty-two square miles.

Located just minutes from Los Angeles, Simi Valley offers a vibrant city full of cultural diversity, historical landmarks and beautiful rolling hills with the charm of a small town close to Southern California’s most famous attractions. Simi Valley is Southern California’s best kept secret, the perfect choice for a getaway, meeting, or wedding. The City is home to a variety of business industries, Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-2
including Aerospace, Commercial Aircraft, and Defense Manufacturing, software and technology, warehouse and distribution and auto and transportation.

9.2.2 History
The City of Simi Valley was incorporated in 1969 under the general laws of the State of California. It is believed that the name of the Chumash Indian Village “Shimiji” is the origin of the City’s name. Ta’apu is the origin of the names of Tapo Street and Tapo Canyon. The official City tree is the Coast Live Oak, whose acorns were used by the Chumash Indians for food. The official City flower is the California Wild Rose, from which the Chumash Indians ate vitamin-rich rosehips. In 1795, San José de Nuestra Señora de Altagracia y Simí was granted to Santiago Pico, one of 240 colonists from Mexico, by Spanish Governor Diego de Borica. This land grant, approximately 113,000 acres in size, was one of the largest ever made.

9.2.3 Governing Body Format
The City of Simi Valley operates under a General-Law/council-manager form of government.

The City Council of Simi Valley assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; the Emergency Services department will oversee its implementation.

9.3 CURRENT TRENDS

9.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the City of Simi Valley as of January 2020, was 125,115. Since 2010, the population has grown at an average annual rate of 0.06 percent.

9.3.2 Development
Early development in Simi Valley was agricultural in nature with a variety of crops and cattle grazing on much of the valley floor. As the City grew, development on the valley floor was characterized by a continuous pattern of suburban construction dominated by one and two-story buildings, schools, housing, shopping centers, community facilities, and places of employment, interspersed with parks and open spaces. As growth continued, available vacant land on the valley floor became more limited, and outward expansion of residential development into nearby hillsides occurred. Specific plans have been prepared for several larger-scale projects, in order to preserve the hillside areas as an important natural and visual resource and to provide for the orderly growth of these areas. Examples include the Wood Ranch Specific Plan, Runkle Canyon Specific Plan, and the Whiteface Specific Plan.

Commercial development has also occurred in the community, the most recent being the region-serving Simi Valley Town Center.

The City has developed a region-serving shopping center, the Simi Valley Town Center, and a large residential development in the north-central part of the City called the Big Sky Ranch. Both projects incorporated significant hazard mitigation in the development process; they represent a major success story in the use of hazard mitigation policies to build a safe community. The North Simi Detention basin Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-3
was built to mitigate flooding in both developments, and in the process, removed downstream homes from the FEMA FIRM areas. The strict enforcement of building codes in the developments incorporated current seismic, fire, and flooding mitigation standards.

Simi Valley’s land use pattern reflects the City’s identity as a residential community with significant protected open space and parklands. Residential development represents the predominant land use in the City, making up more than 71 percent of its total land area. Parks and other public and semi-public uses such as schools, cemeteries, a regional landfill, and transportation rights-of-way make up just over 20 percent of the land uses. Industrial and commercial are the remaining land uses in the City, occupying approximately 5 percent and 3 percent, respectively, and represent the smallest component of the City’s overall land use pattern.

Table 9-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

Table 9-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since
the preparation of the previous hazard
mitigation plan?
No
• If yes, give the estimated area annexed
and estimated number of parcels or
structures.

N/A
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any
areas during the performance period of this
plan?
Yes
• If yes, describe land areas and dominant
uses.

Approximately 486 acres of land spread across 447 parcels located on the north west of the City the north east of the City and around Sinaloa Lake. The uses in these areas include vacant and agricultural land as well as land improved with single family residences.

• If yes, who currently has permitting
authority over these areas?
Ventura County
Are any areas targeted for development or
major redevelopment in the next five years?
Yes
• If yes, briefly describe, including whether
any of the areas are in known hazard risk
areas
The Lost Canyons Residential Development consisting of 364 single-family dwellings located on the northern outskirts of the City Limits is located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and pockets of landslide and liquefaction hazards. These areas have been studied in the project’s Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Measures are in place to protect the public safety.

The 210-unit North Canyons Ranch Project located adjacent to the northern City Boundary is located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and small areas of landslide and liquefaction hazard areas. The project’s EIR will address safety issues and mitigation measures to address these hazards
How many permits for new construction were
issued in your jurisdiction since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 101 87 91 51 53
Multi-Family 35 8 29 27 3
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 16 5 6 5 3
Total 152 100 126 83 59
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-4
Criterion Response
Provide the number of new-construction
permits for each hazard area or provide a
qualitative description of where development
has occurred.
• Special Flood Hazard Areas: 0 (New development is prohibited in the SFHA) • Landslide: *
• High Liquefaction Areas: *
• Tsunami Inundation Area: 0
• Wildfire Risk Areas: *
*The City of Simi Valley includes substantial areas of earthquake-induced landscape and liquefaction areas, and wildfire-risk areas. Pursuant to the General Plan, Building Codes and geotechnical standards have been adopted to provide protection for new and renovated structures in these hazard areas. For Special Flood Hazard Areas, all new construction, substantial repair/improvements, and grading are prohibited. The City does not have any Tsunami Inundation Areas.

Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s
buildable lands inventory. If no such
inventory exists, provide a qualitative
description.

The City is virtually built out, with little undeveloped land remaining. The hillside open space areas surrounding the community are expected to remain substantially unchanged as development in these areas is regulated through the City’s Hillside Performance Standards, which are designed to preserve the natural resources surrounding the community.

9.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Findings of the capability assessment were reviewed to identify opportunities to expand, initiate or integrate capabilities to further hazard mitigation goals and objectives. Where such opportunities were identified and determined to be feasible, they are included in the action plan. The “Analysis of Mitigation Actions” table in this annex identifies these as community capacity building mitigation actions. The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 9-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 9-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 9-5. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 9-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 9-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 9-8. • Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 9-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 9-10.

Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-5
Table 9-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Simi Valley Municipal Code, Title 8, Simi Valley Building Code; California Building Codes, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations
Zoning Code Yes No Portions Yes
Comment: Simi Valley Municipal Code, Title 9, Planning and Zoning Subdivisions Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Simi Valley Municipal Code, Title 9, Planning and Zoning/ State Subdivision Map Act (Govt. Code Sec. 66410- 66499.58), Title 7, Chapter 5 Flood Damage Prevention
Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Simi Valley Municipal Code, Title 7, Chapter 5 Flood Damage Prevention, National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), NFIP Community Rating System, California State Water Quality Control Board MS4 Permit Post-Disaster Recovery Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Mandated by CalOES and FEMA for funding.

Real Estate Disclosure Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: SFHA & All-Hazards declaration (State, City)
Growth Management Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Simi Valley General Plan
Site Plan Review Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: (Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District, VC Fire, VCPWA-WP) Simi Valley Municipal Code, Title 9, Planning and Zoning
Environmental Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: CEQA
Flood Damage Prevention Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: Simi Valley Municipal Code, Title 7, Chapter 5 Flood Damage Prevention, National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), NFIP Community Rating System SFHA (FEMA, City)
Emergency Management Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Mandated by CalOES and FEMA for funding.

Climate Change Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: CEQA
Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? Yes
Comment: Once Safety Element is updated in October 2021, this will comply with AB2140.

Capital Improvement Plan Yes No No Yes
How often is the plan updated? Every Year
Comment: City of Simi Valley Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Disaster Debris Management Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: Must meet requirements for CalOES and FEMA funding Floodplain or Watershed Plan No No No Yes
Comment: Both plans are in currently in conceptual form (FEMA, VCPWA-WP, City) Stormwater Plan Yes No No No
Comment: 2016 Master Plan of Drainage requires update (City) Urban Water Management Plan Yes No Yes No
Comment: 2020 Plan recently adopted
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-6

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Habitat Conservation Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: General Plan/CEQA addresses portions of this
Economic Development Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: City of Simi Valley Economic Development Plan
Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: The City doesn’t have shoreline.

Community Wildfire Protection Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: VCFPD’s Ready, Set, Go! Wildfire Action Plan; Ventura County Fire Code Section W106- Fire Protection, Fuel Modification and Vegetation Management Plans and FHRP
Forest Management Plan No No No No
Comment: The City doesn’t have forests.

Climate Action Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: General Plan/CEQA addresses portions of this.

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Updating in 2022. Required by CalOES and FEMA for funding.

Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) Yes No No Yes Comment: The City relies on Ventura County’s THIRA.

Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Opportunity to expand it in 2022 EOP update. Required by CalOES and FEMA for funding.

Continuity of Operations Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Opportunity to expand it in 2022 EOP update. Required by CalOES and FEMA for funding.

Public Health Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Opportunity to expand it in 2022 EOP update

Table 9-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Public Works issues Flood Area Development Permits for development within the SFHA. Environmental Services.

Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? No Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? Yes

Table 9-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes If yes, specify: Water and Sewer Fees
Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas Yes
Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-7
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes Other Yes (Traffic Mitigation fees)

Table 9-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/Deputy Director (Development Services) Public Works/Senior Engineer (Development Services)
Environmental Services/Planning Division
Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/Deputy Director (Development Services) Public Works/Senior Engineer (Development Services)
Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/Deputy Director (Development Services) Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/Deputy Director (Development Services) Surveyors Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: The City contracts surveying services with outside consultants.

Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/GIS Coordinator, Police Dept/Emergency Services Manager Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/Deputy Director (Development Services) Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Police Dept/Emergency Services Manager Grant writers Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Police Dept/Emergency Services Manager. Administrative Services also contracts these services through an outside consultant

Table 9-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The City’s 2015 Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan is posted.

Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The City and SVPD use Twitter, Next Door and other outlets.

Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? Yes If yes, briefly describe: NFIP CRS Program for Public Information Program and Committee; CERT and Disaster Service Worker volunteer teams.

Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: NFIP CRS Program for Public Information Program and Committee; AM530 Radio; Portable digital signs and SVTV cable channel.

Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The County of Ventura uses VC Alert and we encourage residents to sign up.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-8
Table 9-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance
Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Public Works/Public Works Director Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? Yes What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? February 27, 2017 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Exceeds If exceeds, in what ways? All development within the SFHA, including fill, is prohibited. Additional higher regulatory design and construction standards have been codified in the SVMC.

When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact?
December 3, 2021
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
Are any RiskMAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? No If no, state why. The Flood Insurance Study and FIRMs do not accurately represent true flood risk and are overtly conservative. The City is working with FEMA Region 9 to identify funding for either a RiskMap to correct these mapping issues or a Flood Hazard Study to support a subsequent City sponsored mapping change application to FEMA.

Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
Yes
If so, what type of assistance/training is needed? City staff needs training in grant management (NDGrants) and the Mapping Information Platform (MIP) in order to pursue FEMA grant funding for mapping projects.

Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? Yes If yes, is your jurisdiction interested in improving its CRS Classification? Yes How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction? 1,624 What is the insurance in force? $425,325,500
What is the premium in force? $1,337,947
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction? 82 What were the total payments for losses? $116,840
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Table 9-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 0611172016 N/A
DUNS # Yes 076238211 N/A
Community Rating System Yes 5 10/01/19
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Yes 2 10/2/17 Public Protection Yes 03/3X 12/21/2018
Storm Ready No N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready N/A N/A N/A

Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-9
Table 9-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Rating
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Medium Comment: The General Plan Safety & Noise Chapter update was adopted on October 25, 2021, and includes new Emergency Preparedness Goals and Policies to respond to climate change.

Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts High Comment: City of Simi Valley Climate Action Plan
Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities High Comment: City of Simi Valley Greenhouse Gas Inventory Policy, Climate Action Plan; City of Sim Valley Green Community Action Plan Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory High Comment: City of Simi Valley Climate Action Plan
Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts High Comment: Appendix A of General Plan, Policies Addressing Climate Change Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Medium Comment: Ventura County Fire Protection District, Ventura County Health Department, Ventura County OES Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes High Comment: General Plan was adopted on October 25, 2021
Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts High Comment: City of Simi Valley Climate Action Plan
Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts High
Comment: City of Simi Valley Climate Action Plan
Champions for climate action in local government departments High Comment: Planning, Public Works and City Manager’s Office staff through the implementation of the General Plan, Climate Action Plan and efforts to enhance resiliency of City Buildings.

Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies High Comment: The City Council voted to join the Clean Power Alliance, a Community Choice Aggregator, focused On providing clean energy to communities in Southern California.

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation High Comment: The City has undertaken a multi-million dollar project at the Wastewater Treatment Plant to Enhance the City’s resiliency; has invested in solar, battery back-up systems for City facilities, LED lighting, and similar projects.

Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted High Comment: Businesses must abide by the California Green Building Code, the City’s General Plan. However, Many sectors are regulated by the State and Federal government.

Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Medium Comment: Staff does consistent outreach to the community regarding the need for water conservation due to Drought, preparation for PSPS events due to severe weather and possible Wildfire, but there is opportunity for improvement.

Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comment: Some Simi Valley residents have adopted the use of solar panels to be less reliant on the grid but there are other opportunities that can be explored.

Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: Residents have been installing solar panels and buying electric vehicles, but there are other opportunities that can be explored.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-10
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Rating
Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: The City has a diversified economy, which can adapt to climate impacts, but much of the workforce needs training to stay current.

Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment: The City does not have the specialized staff and funding to revamp the ecosystem to be more resilient. a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist, but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

9.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

9.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• 2016 Master Plan of Drainage—SVMC 7-5.605, Flood Damage Prevention, Standards for subdivisions and other proposed development.
• NFIP CRS Program for Public Information—NFIP CRS PPI Plan adopted by the City Council. • Emergency Operations Plan—The EOP explains how the City will plan for, respond to and recover from hazards and disasters. Disaster Debris Management is included in the EOP. • Simi Valley General Plan—Safety Element addresses integration of hazard mitigation into the overall development of the City’s and identifies policies and implantation programs. • Simi Valley Municipal Code, Title 9, Planning and Zoning—Planning and Building Code integrate safe building and land use practices to mitigate risk. • California Environmental Quality Act—Requires the assessment of wildlife risk, climate change impacts and environmental impacts on land development projects in the City of Simi Valley.

9.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-11
programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• Post-Disaster Recovery Plan—The City can expand the 2015 HMP recovery plan into a more detailed version.
• Continuity of Operations Plan—The City can expand the current recovery plan to build on the goals and objectives identified in the hazard mitigation plan. • Public Health Plan—The City can expand the current recovery plan to build on the goals and objectives identified in the hazard mitigation plan.
• Economic Development Plan—The City can look for mitigation opportunities in private sector partnerships.
• Home Rehabilitation Program—The City can investigate expanding the program to incorporate clean energy technology.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

9.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

9.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 9-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Table 9-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
COVID-19 Pandemic DR-4482 01/20/20 – contin
uing
N/A
Severe Weather N/A 02/28/2021 Strong and gusty Santa Ana winds impacted the coastal valleys of Ventura County. Some peak north to northeast wind reports from the local mesonet included east Simi Valley (gust 61 mph).

Wildfire (Easy Fire) FM-5298 10/30-11/2/2019 The three-day fire burned 1,806 acres in west Simi Valley and threatened the Reagan Presidential Library.

Wildfire (Woolsey Fire) DR-4407 11/8-25/2018 This fire was active for 56 days in Ventura and LA counties. It burned over 96,000 acres south of Simi Valley and is the eighth most destructive fire in California history.

Wildfire (Peak Fire) N/A 11/12/2018 This one-day fire burned 186 acres east of Simi Valley off Hwy 118 and Rocky Peak Road.

Wildfire, Flooding,
Landslide
DR-4353 12/4/2017-
1/31/2018
Wildfire, Mudflows and Debris Flows
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-12
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Wildfire (Thomas Fire) FM-5224 12/4/2017 Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District $4M, SVPD $35K in SVPD overtime. This fire was active for 38 days in Ventura and Santa Barbara counties. It was started by power lines and burned over 280,000 acres and destroyed 1,063 structures. Rye Fire burned 12/5- 12/2017 in Santa Clarita but didn’t reach Simi Valley.

Wildfire (Kuehner Fire) N/A 7/1/2016 This one-day fire burned 45 acres off Hwy 118 at Rocky Peak Road, northeast of Simi Valley.

Wildfire (Rustic Fire) N/A 8/16/2015 This one-day fire threatened 500 homes in southwest Simi Valley before being extinguished. Residents were advised to prepare to evacuate their animals, especially livestock, but no evacuation orders were issued.

Flooding N/A 12/12/2014 Heavy rain produced flash flooding and mud and debris flows in the community of Simi Valley. Law enforcement reported mud flows across Hwy 118 at Kuehner Drive.

Wildfire (Springs Fire) FM-5024 5/2-11/2013 Impacted Ventura County.

Severe Storm and Flooding N/A 1/18-22/2010 Heavy rain, gusty winds, and heavy snow were witnessed in Ventura County. Rainfall totals ranged from 4-8 inches over coastal areas to 8-16 inches in the foothills and mountains. Flash flood watches were issued in areas of Ventura County that were damaged by wildfires in 2008.

Wildfire, Flooding,
Landslide
DR-1731 10/21/2007-
3/31/2008
Minor flooding of streets; First Street bridge flooded, which is common with heavy rain. Los Angeles Ave/Madera Road intersection flooded. A blocked storm drain near Santa Susana Park at Katherine Road resulted in the flooding of a few homes.

Wildfire (Sesnon Fire) N/A 10/13-18/2008 EOC activated 10/13-15/2008. Fire active from 10/13 – 18/2008.

Severe Weather DR-1689 1/11-17/2007 Freeze.

Wildfire (Day Fire) FM-2677 9/25-30/2006 Burned 162,000 acres over 28 days north of Simi Valley.

Wildfire (School Fire) FM-2586 11/18-23/2005 Burned almost 4,000 acres over four days near the City of Ventura.

Wildfire (Topanga Fire) FM-2583 9/28-10/10/2005 This Chatsworth-area fire burned along the LA/Ventura counties border for seven days, destroying over 24,000 acres.

Flooding DR-1585 2/16-23/2005 Madera Rd/Los Angeles Ave flooded Severe Storms and
Flooding
DR-1577 12/27/2004-
1/11/2005
(Simi Valley: 1/7-
11/2005)

$21,588. In January 2005, winter storms brought heavy rains to the region. The Ventura River reached a maximum stage of 17.5 feet and maximum discharge of 152,560 cfs. High water flows, scouring, and washouts in the Ventura River damaged several water wells and exposed water lines owned by the Ojai Valley Sanitary District. Severe erosion occurred along both embankments of the Ventura River. The Calleguas Creek topped its banks near the state hospital in Camarillo. Damage from the January 2005 storms totaled more than $200 million.

Wildfire (Simi Fire) FM-2504 10/24 – 11/11/20
03 Per CAL FIRE: 108K acres burned, 315 structures destroyed, 11 structures damaged.

Wildfire DR-1498 10/21/2003-
3/31/2004
Impacted Ventura County.

Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-13
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Severe Storms, Tornado,
High Winds and Flooding
DR-1267 12/20-28/1998 Impacted Ventura County.

Severe Winter Storms and
Flooding (“El Nino” winter)
DR-1203 2/2 – 4/30/1998 In this “El Nino” winter, Simi Valley received 17.2 inches of rain during February. The maximum flow in Calleguas Creek as recorded at the California State University Channel Islands was 21,600 ft³/s, which caused overtopping of the bridges at Pacific Coast Highway.

Wildfires (Calabasas/Malibu
Fires)
EM-3120 10/21-31/1996 Impacted Ventura County.

Severe Storms and
Flooding
DR-1046 2/13-4/19/1995
(Simi Valley: 1/3-
10/1995;
3/10/1995)
Rainfall intensities in some locations were equivalent or greater than 100- year frequency precipitation. Significant local flooding occurred as a result of channels and local storm drains being overtaxed. On March 10, a cooler winter storm brought significant amounts of precipitation with damaging results due to the saturated soil conditions. The peak flow recorded on Calleguas Creek at the stream gauge above Highway 101 was 9,120 ft³/s and at the CSUCI gauge, it was 14,900 ft³/s.

Earthquake (Northridge) DR-1008 1/17-11/30/1994 The Simi Valley Police station was badly damaged and eventually had to be abandoned. Hwy 118 was badly damaged and unusable for months. In the greater Los Angeles area, the 6.7 earthquake caused 57 deaths; 9,253 injuries and displaced over 20,000 people.

Wildfires, Mud &
Landslides, Soil Erosion &
Flooding
DR-1005 10/26-4/22/1994 Impacted Ventura County.

Severe Storm, Mud &
Landslides, Flooding
DR-979 1/5-3/20/1993 Impacted Ventura County.

Severe Storm, Severe
Weather, Flooding, Mud &
Landslide
DR-935 2/10-19/1992 The storm lasted five days, leaving flood control structures damaged, full of debris, and vulnerable to future storms. Of primary concern in Ventura County was erosion of channels and removal of debris following flood flows. The seven-day depths in Ventura County ranged from 6 to 13 inches, which represented about 60-65 percent of the mean annual rainfall. Although the peak flow in Calleguas Creek was estimated to be about a 10-year event, approximately one million cubic yards of sediment was deposited in the channel system. Conejo Creek contributed much of the sediment, as it was running higher than Calleguas Creek at the confluence of the two streams. On Calleguas Creek, the Lewis Street bridge abutments were undermined and required stone placement on them to prevent further damage.

Severe Weather (Severe
Freeze)
DR-894 12/19/1990-
1/3/1991 Minor flooding of streets, including the First Street bridge and Los Angeles Ave/Madera Road.

Severe Storm and Flooding DR-677 1/21-3/30/1983
(Ventura County:
2/25-3/3/1983)
With the ground wet from a January storm, heavy precipitation produced high flows in most creeks in southern California. On Collogues Creek, at the CSUCI stream gage, Madera St. stream gauge, and the stream gauge above Highway 101, the peak discharges of record occurred, 26,600 ft³/s, 10,570 ft³/s and 17,200 ft³/s, respectively. As in 1980, the Calleguas Creek levee was breached. The maximum peak discharge on Conejo Creek at the stream gauge above Highway 101 was 14,000 ft³/s.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-14
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Severe Storm and Flooding N/A 2/13-22/1980 A series of varying intensity fronts coming from the west soaked southern California with eight days of nearly continuous rain. Six storms moved through southern California during February 13-22. The strongest front passed the area midday on Saturday February 16, producing the second highest peak discharge of record on Calleguas Creek of 25,300 ft³/s at the CSUCI stream gauge, 9,310 ft³/s at the Madera St. stream gauge, and 14,000 ft³/s at the stream gauge above Highway 101. This storm caused a breach of the west levee of Calleguas Creek below Hueneme Road, with an estimated total of 24,000 acre-ft of water flowing through the breach before it was repaired. The maximum peak discharge on Conejo Creek at the stream gauge above Highway 101 was 11,800 ft³/s.

Severe Storms and
Flooding
DR-547 2/15/1978
(Simi Valley:
2/28-3/5/1978)
Storms and accompanying flooding throughout February saturated the ground. A last front on March 4 brought heavy rain, thunderstorms and gale force winds. Measurements were 7,730 ft³/s at the Madera St. stream gauge and 8,600 ft³/s at the Moorpark stream gauge.

Severe Storms and
Flooding
DR-364 2/8/1973 Impacted Ventura County.

Wildfire DR-295 9/29/1970 Impacted Ventura County.

9.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 9-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Table 9-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Wildfire 36 High
1 Landslide 36 High
3 Earthquake 32 Medium
4 Flooding 24 Medium
4 Severe Storms 24 Medium
4 Severe Weather 24 Medium
5 Dam Failure 22 Medium
6 Drought 9 Low

9.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:

Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-15
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: 0 • Number of Repetitive-Loss Properties or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: 0
Other Noted Vulnerabilities
The following jurisdiction-specific issues have been identified based on a review of the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, and other available resources:
• Water tanks and system could be attacked by terrorists using chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, explosive or other weapons.
• Frequent wildfires along the 118 Freeway, mostly caused by humans.

Mitigation actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

9.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 9-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Table 9-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update

1.A.1 Modify the City’s zoning ordinance as necessary to address development in hazard areas and reflect changes in the General Plan.
 SIM-2
Comment: This is an ongoing process. Safety Element of the Simi Valley General Plan update was adopted in October, 2021. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

1.B.1 Modify local building codes to address development issues in hazard areas.

In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.  SIM-2

Comment: This is an ongoing process. Ordinance 1268 was adopted in 2017 rewriting and significantly expanding the Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance to codify historic City policy and practice as higher regulatory standards for development citywide and particularly within the Special Flood Hazard Areas.

1.B.2 Actively participate in the state and national building code development groups to ensure that development issues in hazard areas are properly addressed.
 SIM-2

Comment: This is an ongoing process. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

1.B.3 Require site-specific studies to evaluate specific hazards in hazard-prone areas and identify alternative site design criteria to mitigate hazards to the maximum extent possible.
 SIM-8

Comment: Geotechnical, Soils, and Drainage studies are required for all development. The Planning process requires site-specific studies mostly through the CEQA process to evaluate hazards and promote alternative site design criteria. SVMC 9-64.100, Development Code, Geotechnical (Soils) Reports, SVMC 7-5.602, Flood Damage Prevention, Standards of Construction. This is an ongoing action. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-16
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update

1.C.1 Review General Plan, Zoning Codes, Fire Codes, Subdivision Ordinance, and Building Code for consistency.
 SIM-2
Comment: The municipal code is routinely reviewed to ensure consistency with NFIP and CRS standards and requirements along with current floodplain management state of practice. This is an ongoing action. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

1.C.2 Establish hazard mitigation training for development staff.  SIM-8 Comment: PW Development Services staff maintains competency in floodplain management through continual training and at least one staff member holds a Certified Floodplain Manager certificate from the American Society of Floodplain Managers. This is an ongoing action. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

1.D.1 Update databases/Geographic Information System (GIS), with particular attention to maintaining hazard overlay layers.
 SIM-8
Comment: The City’s NFIP SFHA GIS layers are updated whenever FEMA issues FIRM updates and on an ongoing basis. ESRI will perform annual maintenance on GIS system. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

2.A.1 Assist local mobile home parks with their community preparedness plans.  SIM-10 Comment: SVOES can conduct outreach via a preparedness campaign. Not completed due to lack of staff capacity. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

2.A.2 Develop and conduct a variety of community workshops to educate about earthquake preparedness and the benefits of retrofitting buildings for improved seismic performance. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.
 SIM-10
Comment: SVOES can conduct outreach via a preparedness campaign in partnership with Building & Safety. Not completed due to lack of staff capacity.

2.A.3 Increase awareness among at-risk populations of emerging earthquake damage mitigation techniques.
 SIM-10
Comment: SVOES can conduct outreach via a preparedness campaign. Not completed due to lack of staff capacity. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

2.A.4 Develop a program that identifies the needs of senior citizens and assists them to meet those needs.

Comment: The County is responsible for keeping updated records on seniors who may need assistance evacuating in an emergency.

This is not a responsibility of the City.

2.B.1 Provide hazard mitigation links on the Chamber of Commerce’s website and the City’s website.
 SIM-10
Comment: SVOES can conduct outreach via a preparedness campaign. Not completed due to lack of staff capacity. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

3.A.1 Promote the upgrade of buildings to provide acceptable performance during an earthquake and adopt cost-effective mitigation techniques for both structural and non-structural elements.
 SIM-1
SIM-9

Comment: SVOES can conduct outreach via a preparedness campaign in partnership with Building & Safety. Not completed due to lack of staff capacity. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

3.A.2 Conduct a seismic safety survey/assessment of the City’s facilities to ensure that heavy furniture and equipment are properly secured.  SIM-9
Comment: Ongoing as personnel are added and moved. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-17
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update

3.A.3 Support legislative efforts to provide funding for hospital earthquake retrofit projects.

Comment: This is not currently in our Legislative Platform and would need to be included in order for the City to take action on legislation without going to the Council for approval first.

3.B.1 Retrofit water system infrastructure to seismic safety standards.  SIM-9 Comment: A seismic evaluation of water system infrastructure was completed in 2021. The District will schedule projects to improve and replace facilities based on public safety and operational importance. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

3.B.2 Retrofit sanitation system infrastructure to
seismic safety standards
 SIM-1
Comment: The building seismic retrofit projects that were identified in the 2011 Sanitation Asset Reliability Assessment have been completed. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

3.B.3 Conduct seismic non-structural and structural retrofit of critical facilities and infrastructure.
 SIM-1
SIM-9
Comment: Construction has begun on a project to repair and replace structural elements at the City’s Public Services Center and Garage Facility. Anticipated completion is Spring 2022. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

3.C.1 Identify multi-unit buildings (e.g. soft story construction) that may suffer structural failures in earthquakes.
 SIM-9
Comment: This is an opportunity for earthquake mitigation. Not completed due to lack of staff capacity and funding. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

4.A.1 Implement a fuel reduction program, such as the collection and disposal of dead fuel, within open spaces and around critical facilities and residential structures with high or very high wildfire zones.
 SIM-12
Comment: VCFPD Ordinance 31 and Fire Hazard Reduction Program, which is an ongoing program. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application and to align with VCFPD’s lead.

4.A.2 Create a vegetation management program that provides vegetation management services to the elderly, disabled, or low income property owners who lack the resources to remove flammable vegetation near their homes.  SIM-12
Comment: This is an opportunity for wildfire mitigation. Not completed due to lack of staff capacity. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application and to align with VCFPD’s lead.

4.A.3 Implement a fuel modification program that includes maintenance requirements, plan submittal and approval process and enforcement.  SIM-12
Comment: Ventura County Fire Code Section W106- Fire Protection, Fuel Modification and Vegetation Management Plans and FHRP Ongoing program. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application and to align with VCFPD’s lead.

5.A.1 Limit uses in floodways to those tolerant of occasional flooding, including but not limited to agriculture, outdoor recreation and natural resource areas.  SIM-4
Comment: Development within floodways is prohibited. Maintenance of open space as a natural resource area and/or for recreation and agriculture is encouraged. SVMC 7-5.601, Flood Damage Prevention, Prohibitions. Simi Valley General Plan Open Space Element.

Ongoing. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

5. B.1 Discourage the disruption of natural flowage patterns and encourage the use of natural drainage ways in new development.
 SIM-4
Comment: Disruption of natural flowage patterns is prohibited and maintenance of natural drainage ways within new development is enforced. SVMC 9-32.120, Development Code, Drainage Standards. Ongoing. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-18
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update

5.C.1 Submit Letters of Map Revision/ Letters of Map Amendment to FEMA within a prescribed period of time upon completion of drainage improvements or flood- proofing. SVMC 7-5.605, Flood Damage Prevention, Standards for subdivisions and other proposed development
 SIM-4

Comment: SVMC 7-5.605, Flood Damage Prevention, Standards for subdivisions and other proposed development. Ongoing. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

6.A.1 Create and maintain a mailing list of all addresses with dam inundation areas for mailings and public information documents.
 SIM-14

Comment: Creation of the mailing list is pending CalOES approval of VCPWA-WP EAPs for each of the 3 State jurisdictional dams within the City. Inundation maps and EAPs for jurisdictional dams owned by the Calleguas Municipal Water District and the Sinaloa Lake homeowners’ association are also pending. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

6.A.2 Create and maintain a special grouping for emergency notification system users within the dam inundation areas for emergency information delivery.  SIM-14

Comment: OES will leverage VC Alert. Ongoing. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

7.A.1 Increase field personnel’s awareness of hazardous materials incidents and the proper response.
 SIM-11

Comment: SVPD conducts regular trainings during briefings and will continue these. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

7.B.1 Establish and maintain relationships with operators and regulators involved in the transport, extraction, processing and use of hazardous materials.  SIM-11
Comment: City code Title 6 Chapter 10 addresses hazardous wastes. Title 9 Chapter 9-26.070 regulates industrial storage. Title 6 Chapter 13 describes the need for plans to prevent releases of hazardous materials/wastes into the sewer system. Dept. Of Transportation regulates rail cars. The Ventura County Certified Unified Program Agency regulates the storage of hazardous materials on commercial properties. Ongoing. In the update, this action has been reworded for a broader application.

9.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 9-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 9-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 9-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Table 9-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New
or Existing
Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action SIM-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure Existing 9, 10, 11, 16 City of Simi Valley Ventura County OES High FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMA, PDM and HMGP)
Short-term
Action SIM-2—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including Simi Valley General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfires, Landslides, Earthquakes, Flooding, Dam Failure New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10,
11, 13, 14, 15, 16
City of Simi Valley Ventura County Fire Dept,
VCSOES
Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-19
Benefits New
or Existing
Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action SIM-3—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure, Drought New & Existing 1-19 City of Simi Valley Ventura County Fire Dept, VCSOES
Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term
Action SIM-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements:
• Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance.
• Participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates. • Provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding, Dam Failure, Severe Storms New & Existing 1, 4, 11 City of Simi Valley Public Works Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing Action SIM-5—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including but not limited to the following:
• Update the Climate Action Plan and other City plans, when necessary and applicable to remain in compliance and leverage opportunities.
• Explore clean air technologies for City equipment and infrastructure.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Flooding, Drought New & Existing 1, 3, 4 City of Simi Valley Interdepartmental Low Staff Time, General Funds Short-term Action SIM-6—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power, including City Hall, Police Station and Senior Center.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure Existing 2, 6, 9 City Manager’s
Office
Public Works High Staff time, General and
enterprise funds, HMGP,
BRIC
Long-term
Action SIM-7—Develop evacuation routes and plans, partnering with neighboring cities and counties.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Landslide, Earthquake, Flooding, Dam Failure Existing 1, 2, 8, 17 City of Simi Valley

Cities of Thousand Oaks
& Moorpark; VCSOES;
VCFPD
Low Staff Time, CDBG20, FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA, HMGP),
Short-term
Action SIM-8—Increase knowledge of hazard areas and understanding of vulnerability and risk to life and property in hazard-prone areas, including but not limited to these items:
• Conduct site-specific studies to evaluate hazards and identify alternative site design criteria. • Continue ongoing training for development staff.
• Update GIS hazard overlay layers.
• Map new earth movement hazards and make information available to staff, developers, and residents so that soil types, slope percentage, drainage, or other critical factors are used to identify landslide prone areas • Develop flood-after-fire scenarios after wildland fires to identify risks and develop mitigation measures Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Wildfire, Landslide, Flooding, Dam Failure, Severe Storms, Severe Weather New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 12, 14, 15, 16,
17, 19
Public Works Environmental Services Medium General Fund/Staff time,

HMGP, BRIC, FMA
Ongoing
Action SIM-9—Perform structure-specific, all-risk, vulnerability assessment of all City-owned critical facilities (including bridge, water, sanitation and storm drain infrastructure).

Identify potentially vulnerable private utility systems including electric, gas, oil, water, sewer, communications and internet.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 18, 19 Building & Safety Public Works Low General Fund/Staff time,

HMGP, BRIC, FMA
Long-term
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-20
Benefits New
or Existing
Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action SIM-10—Create and conduct hazard mitigation and emergency preparedness outreach campaigns for the low-to-moderate income and Spanish-speaking communities then adapt and expand these campaigns to other demographics and the whole community.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Wildfire, Landslide, Flooding, Dam Failure, Severe Storms, Severe Weather Existing 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 10,
12, 13, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18
SVOES City of Simi Valley,

VCSOES, VCFPD
Low Staff Time, CDBG20,
HMGP
Short-term,
Ongoing
Action SIM-11—The City shall continue to provide inspections, emergency response, and enforcement of hazardous materials and waste compliance procedures in the community. The City shall continue to work with relevant agencies regarding enforcement of hazardous materials regulations and continue to conduct household hazardous waste collection events.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Wildfire, Flooding, Dam Failure Existing 1, 4, 16, 18, 19 Public Works Ventura County Certified Unified Program Agency
Low Staff Time Ongoing
Action SIM-12—Maintain wildfire hazard fuel reduction program for areas that have been identified with overgrown or dead brush, trees and weeds to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program. (Coordinates with Ventura County Fire Protection District Action VFP-6) Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10,
11, 13, 14, 15, 18,
19 VCFPD

CAL FIRE & USDA Medium FEMA HMA (BRIC, FMAP
and HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Ongoing
Action SIM-13—The City shall amend the local building code to account for additional climate change-induced stressors on buildings, such as including flood proofing for intermittent inundation, building materials to reduce the impacts of high heat days, and fireproofing in preparation for increased wildfire risk.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire, Flooding, Severe Storm, Severe Weather New & Existing 4, 9, 10, 11, 12,
16, 17
Environmental
Services
Public Works Low Staff time, HMGP, BRIC,
FMA
Ongoing
Action SIM-14—Create a levee and dam failure element for the City’s emergency response plan, including but not limited to these items:

Assess downstream impacts associated with dam incidents.

Develop a public outreach program that informs property owners located in the dam and levee failure inundation areas about voluntary flood insurance.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure
New & Existing 1, 7, 9, 17, 19 SVOES, Public
Works
Calleguas Water, Ventura
County Watershed
Protection
Low GF/Staff Time, HMGP,

BRIC, FMA
Short-
Term;
Ongoing
Action SIM-15—Assess and retrofit or upgrade City-owned facilities with identified risks, including but not limited to these items:

Retrofit or upgrade at-risk and deficient government facilities and public utility systems to ensure the operation and timely restoration of essential systems to reasonable levels of service.

Reinforce roads/bridges from flooding through protection activities, including elevating the roads/bridges and installing/widening culverts beneath the roads/bridges or upgrading storm drains.

Hazards Mitigated: Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Dam Failure New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 18, 19

Environmental
Services, Public
Works
FEMA, CalOES High General Fund, Staff Time,

HMGP, BRIC, FMA
Long Term
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-21
Table 9-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Priority
Grant
Pursuit
Priority
1 4 High High Yes Yes No Medium High
2 12 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
3 19 Low Low Yes No Yes High Low
4 3 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
5 3 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
6 3 High Medium Yes Yes No Low Medium
7 4 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
8 14 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Low
9 7 Medium High No Yes No Low Medium
10 13 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
11 5 Medium Low Yes No Yes High Low
12 12 High Medium Yes Yes Yes High High
13 7 High Medium Yes Yes No Medium High
14 5 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes High Medium
15 7 High High Yes Yes No Low Medium
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Table 9-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Type
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
Wildfire SIM-1, 2, 3, 5,
10, 11, 12, 13
SIM-1, 2, 3,
5, 10, 11,
12, 13
SIM-2, 3, 5, 7,
10, 11, 12, 13
SIM-2, 3,
11 SIM-3, 6, 7,
10, 11, 12
SIM-1, 2, 3,
5, 13
SIM-3, 5, 13 SIM-2, 3, 5, 6,
7, 8, 10
Landslide SIM-1, 2, 3, 5,
14 SIM-1, 2, 3,
5 SIM-2, 3, 5, 7 SIM-2, 3, 5 SIM-3, 6, 7 SIM-1, 2, 3,
5 SIM-3, 5 SIM-2, 3, 5, 7,
8 Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake SIM-1, 2, 3, 9,
10, 11, 15
SIM-1, 2, 3,
10, 11, 15
SIM-3, 7, 10,
11, 15
SIM-3, 11 SIM-3, 6, 7,
10, 11
SIM-1, 2, 3,
9, 15
SIM-3 SIM-2, 3, 6, 7,
8, 10, 15
Flooding SIM-1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
9, 10, 11, 13, 15
SIM-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 10, 11,
13, 15
SIM-3, 4, 5, 7,
10, 11
13, 15
SIM-3, 5,
11 SIM-3, 6, 7,
10, 11
SIM-1, 2, 3,
4, 5, 9, 13,
15 SIM-3, 5 SIM-2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 10, 15
Severe Storms SIM-3, 4, 9, 10,
13, 15
SIM-3, 4,
10, 13, 15
SIM-3, 4, 10,
13 15
SIM-3 SIM-3, 6, 10 SIM-3, 4, 6,
9, 15
SIM-3 SIM-3, 4, 6, 8,
10, 15
Severe Weather SIM-3, 9, 10, 13,
15 SIM-3, 10,
13, 15
SIM-3, 10, 13,
15 SIM-3 SIM-3, 6, 10 SIM-3, 6, 9,
15 SIM-3 SIM-3, 6, 8,
10, 15
Dam Failure SIM-3, 4, 9, 10,
11, 14, 15
SIM-3, 4,
10, 11, 15
SIM-3, 4, 8,
10, 11, 14, 15
SIM-3, 11 SIM-3, 6, 7, 8,
10, 11, 14, 15
SIM-3, 4, 6,
9, 15
SIM-3 SIM-2, 3, 4, 6,
7, 8, 10, 14, 15
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 9-22
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Type
Hazard Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
Low-Risk Hazards
Drought SIM-3, 5 SIM-3, 5 SIM-3, 5 SIM-3, 5 SIM-3, 5 SIM-3, 5 SIM-3, 5 SIM-3, 5 a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

9.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 9-17 lists public outreach activities for this jurisdiction.

Table 9-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
Presented at four Neighborhood Council meetings 9/9, 9/14, 9/16, 9/21 N/A HMP info & survey link via SVPD Nixle sent to residents and posted on social media
7/27/21 N/A
HMP info & survey link via SVPD Tweet 8/17/21 N/A
HMP info & survey link sent to Neighborhood Councils 1-4 E-Notify List. 8/18/21 1, 400 Emergency Services Manager discussed HMP in radio interview 10/25/21 N/A

9.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• Simi Valley Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • City of Simi Valley Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance—The flood damage prevention ordinance was reviewed for compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. • 2015 Hazard Mitigation Plan—The mitigation strategy action items were used to assess planning and regulatory capabilities and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • 2018 Emergency Operations Plan—The EOP was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration and improvement. • Simi Valley General Plan—The General Plan was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration The following outside resources and references were reviewed:
• Hazard Mitigation Plan Annex Development Toolkit—The toolkit was used to support the identification of past hazard events and noted vulnerabilities, the risk ranking, and the development of the mitigation action plan.

Item No.7D

9. City of Simi Valley
9-23
• FIPS Code—https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference- files/2018/demo/popest/2018- fips.html
• DUNS #—https://www.dnb.com/duns-number.html
• Community Rating System—https://www.fema.gov/floodplain-management/community- rating- system
• Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule—https://www.isomitigation.com/bcegs/iso-s- building-code-effectiveness-grading-schedule-bcegs.html • Public Protection Classification—https://www.isomitigation.com/ppc/ • Storm Ready—https://www.weather.gov/stormready/communities • Firewise—http://www.firewise.org/usa-recognition-program/map-of-active-participants.aspx • Tsunami Ready—https://www.weather.gov/tsunamiready/communities • CEQA statute (Public Resources Code Section 21000 and following), the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 and following) • State Subdivision Map Act (Govt. Code Sec. 66410-66499.58)

Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
!. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Health and Medical
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Simi Valley
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Simi Valley
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
012 0.5
Miles
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Simi Valley
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
012 0.5
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Simi Valley
NEHRP Soil Class
±
012 0.5
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Simi Valley
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
012 0.5
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Simi Valley
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Simi Valley
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Simi Valley
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Simi Valley
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Simi Valley
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
012 0.5
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Simi Valley
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
012 0.5
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Simi Valley
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
012 0.5
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Thousand Oaks
¬«23
¬«118
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤
101£¤
101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CAL FIRE, Esri
Simi Valley
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
±
012 0.5
Miles
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

10-1

10. CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS

10.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Grahame Watts, Emergency Services Manager
2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
805-449-2453
[email protected]
Nader Heydari, Deputy Public Works
Director
2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd.

Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
805-449-2392
[email protected]
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 10-1.

Table 10-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
Grahame Watts Emergency Services Manager (Project Manager) Jim Taylor Senior Civil Engineer
John Brooks Senior Analyst
Michael Devlahovich Utilities Maintenance Supervisor
Kari Finley Planning Division Manager
Iain Holt Senior Planner
David Chavez Landscape Maintenance Supervisor

10.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

10.2.1 Location and Features
Thousand Oaks is the second-largest city in Ventura County and is 40 miles northwest of Downtown Los Angeles. The City is named after the many oak trees present in the area. The City forms the central populated core of the Conejo Valley and includes two-thirds of master-planned community of Westlake Village and most of Newbury Park, which were annexed by the city during the late 1960s and 1970s.

The City of Thousand Oaks has a population of 126,484 and is nearly built out, placing emphasis upon in-fill development, redevelopment and maintenance of aging infrastructure. The Downtown Core Master Plan provides the blueprint for a centralized, walkable shopping, dining and entertainment area adjacent to the Civic Arts Plaza/City Hall, and land use alternatives under the General Plan were Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-2
updated for increased density and mixed-use development along the Thousand Oaks Boulevard corridor.

10.2.2 History
Thousand Oaks was incorporated in 1964 and has evolved from a rural Ventura County settlement into an attractive and desirable Southern California city. Thousand Oaks offers the ideal mixture of commercial, industrial, residential and recreational space in an exceptional location.

The City’s history dates to the Chumash Native Americans who dwelled in the Conejo Valley hundreds of years ago. In 1542, the area was discovered by Spanish explorer Juan Rodriguez Cabrillo, who claimed the land for his Spanish king. The area remained virtually unsettled until the early 1800s when the Spanish governor granted 48,671 acres of land grants to loyal soldiers—land which included the Conejo Valley (Conejo is the Spanish word for rabbit which are abundant in the area).

Throughout the 19th Century, early pioneers migrated to the area. The first post office was built in 1875, and the small settlement became a stop on the stagecoach route between Los Angeles and San Francisco. With the invention of the motor car and the construction of a highway between those two major cities, the Conejo Valley began to evolve.

10.2.3 Governing Body Format
Thousand Oaks is a General Law city with a Council/Manager form of government. This type of government structure designates the City Council as the policy making body, who appoint the City Manager to carrying out Council policy.

The Council consists of five members elected from residents at large. Council members serve four-year staggered terms. Municipal elections are held in November of even numbered years. The City Council annually selects a Mayor who serves as the presiding officer during City Council meetings that are scheduled on Tuesdays approximately two times per month.

The Thousand Oaks City Council is responsible for the adoption of this plan and the Public Works Department oversees its implementation.

10.3 CURRENT TRENDS

10.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of the Thousand Oaks as of January 2020 was 126,484. Since 2010, the population has decreased at an average annual rate of 0.02 percent.

10.3.2 Development
The development mission of Thousand Oaks is to be stewards of the City’s General Plan, and to assist the community with land development, housing, construction, code compliance, open space, and regional issues, all of which are balanced with the City’s environment and resources.

Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-3
Table 10-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

Table 10-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has the City annexed any land since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
Yes

• If yes, give the estimated area annexed
and estimated number of parcels or
structures.
2015—Kelly Estates A & B: Parcel; “A” = 20.32 ac., Parcel “B” = 1.26 ac. (existing developed single-family lots in former County “island”) 2021—Edward-Ventu Park Parcels A & B: Parcel “A” = 0.18 ac., Parcel “B” = 0.22 ac. (2- single-family lots)
Is the City expected to annex any areas
during the performance period of this plan?
No
Are any areas targeted for development or
major redevelopment in the next five years?
Yes
• If yes, briefly describe, including whether
any of the areas are in known hazard risk
areas
These areas primarily consist of larger scale residential projects along Thousand Oaks Boulevard as included in the Community Development Department’ s Development Activity Report (May 2021). Projects in the High Fire Severity Hazard Zone include The Lakes Residential, One Baxter Way residential and the Shapell Industrial Project (49.64 acres and 754,222 SF of building floor area) at northern section of Rancho Conejo Blvd..

How many permits for new construction were
issued in your jurisdiction since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 2,124 1,984 1,870 1,947 1,870
Multi-Family 315 239 244 369 154
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 501 427 379 381 285 Total 2,940 2,650 2,493 2,697 2,179
Provide the number of new-construction
permits for each hazard area or provide a
qualitative description of where development
has occurred.
• Special Flood Hazard Areas: 75
• Landslide: 274
• High Liquefaction Areas: 132
• Tsunami Inundation Area: 0
• Wildfire Risk Areas: 9,934
Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s
buildable lands inventory. If no such
inventory exists, provide a qualitative
description.

Currently, the City does not have an inventory of buildable lands. There is a theoretical residential capacity for the City of 81,124 dwelling units based on an evaluation of 1996 General Plan land use map governed by Measure E. This maximum capacity does not consider constraints that may result in less buildable area. Based on SCAG ’s 2020 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy growth projections out to 2045, Thousand Oaks population will increase by 15,229, households will increase by 5,269 and employment will increase 9,897. The City is currently undergoing a General Plan Update and the Environmental Impact Report will evaluate new growth projections based on the revised land use map and economic analysis. The anticipated adoption date of the General Plan is in FY 2022-23.

10.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-4
identified and determined to be feasible, they are included in the action plan. The “Analysis of Mitigation Actions” table in this annex identifies these as community capacity building mitigation actions. The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 10-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 10-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 10-5. • An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 10-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 10-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 10-8.
• Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 10-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 10-10.

Table 10-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: TOMC Title 8 Ch.1 Building Code amended to reflect 2019 California Building Code Zoning Code Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: TOMC Title 9 Chapter 1 Flood Control requires building permit fees for Ventura County flood control facilities TOMC Title 9 Chapter 4 Zoning and Chapter 5 Environmental Impact Assessment Subdivisions Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: TOMC Title 9 Chapter 3 Subdivisions. Article 14 Environmental Impact and Grading and Erosion Control Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: TOMC 4-7 (Public Safety, Flood Damage Prevention) Post-Disaster Recovery Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City Emergency Operations Plan was adopted on February 25, 2020, which includes a section on Disaster Recovery.

Real Estate Disclosure No Yes No No
Comment: The Community Development Department Building Division prepares residential re -sale disclosure reports per TOMC Title 8 Chapter 12.

Growth Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Measure E requires voter approval for any amendment to the Land Use Element of the City ’s General Plan that: increases residential land use density beyond the City ’s General Plan of November 5, 1996 or increases the amount of commercial acreage beyond the City’s General Plan of November 5, 1996. City Council Ordinance No. 1280-NS Site Plan Review Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The Community Development Department Planning Division and Public Works Engineering Division reviews land use entitlements and subdivisions. County Fire and Police Departments also review projects.

Environmental Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The result of a completed Visioning 2064 process was the development of a Climate and Environmental Action Plan that is expected to be adopted in FY 2022- 23 . The Plan is for the City to be an environmental leader and promote climate change adaptation, zero waste, zero net energy usage, reduced water use, and greenhouse gas reduction, including allocation of the necessary resources. New development is subject to environmental review in accordance with CEQA.

Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-5

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Flood Damage Prevention Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City’s Water Emergency Operations Plan was adopted in June 2021, which includes a section on Flood Damage Prevention. The City and County of Ventura Public Works also developed a Flood Prevention & Preparedness manual that is posted on the City website. The Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance comprises the TOMC 4-7 (Public Safety, Flood Damage Prevention).

Emergency Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City completed a Risk and Resiliency Assessment as part of America’s Water Infrastructure Act (2018) that was submitted to the EPA in December 2020. The City ’s Water Emergency Operations Plan was certified through the EPA in June 2021. .

Thousand Oaks Municipal Code Title 4 Section 404.01 describes the City emergency organization, functions and authorities.

Climate Change Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: An anticipated City goal is to reduce greenhouse gas by a minimum of 40 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050 to match or exceed the State goals. The City’s Climate and Environmental Action Plan is expected to be adopted in FY 2022-23 Planning Documents
City General Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Is the City’s plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? Yes Comment: The Thousand Oaks City General Plan is being updated and is expected to be adopted in FY 2022-23.

Capital Improvement Plan Yes Yes No No
How often is the plan updated?
Comment: The City’s Capital Improvement Plan is part of the City Budget process and is updated every two years.

Disaster Debris Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City has a Disaster Debris Management procedure in its adopted EOP, which is complimentary to the County’s Disaster Debris Management Plan.

Floodplain Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: In January 2010, the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program mapped the City’s 100-year “Areas of Special Flood Hazard” (floodplains). The City’s Capital Improvement Plan does not directly address a strategized approach to reducing or eliminating 100-year floodplains.

Stormwater Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City is participating in a Watershed Management Program and the Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program that are being developed and implemented in compliance with the new State Regional Board Municipal Stormwater Permit.

Urban Water Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: In June 2021, the City adopted the 1) 2020 Urban Water Management Plan, 2) 2020 Water Shortage Contingency Plan, and 3) Addendum to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. Included in the 2020 UWMP are past, present, and projected water use data through 2045: a description of current and future water supply sources and allocations, information on the City’s water conservation program, and background information on the City water system and service area.

Habitat Conservation Plan No No No No
Comment: The City does not have a Habitat Conservation Plan but relies on policies within the Conservation Element of the General Plan. State and Federal agencies are involved as part CEQA review and permitting process. The Conejo Open Space Conservancy Agency (COSCA), a joint-powers authority between the City and the Conejo Recreation and Park District that implements conservation projects and manages habitat lands.

Economic Development Plan Yes Yes No No
Comment: The City Council adopted its Economic Development Plan on November 7, 2017 Shoreline Management Plan No No No No
Comment: Thousand Oaks is inland and does not have a shoreline.

Community Wildfire Protection Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Wildfire protection is described in the City’s EOP in addition to fire protection services provided by the Ventura County Fire Protection District. The City ’s Water Emergency Operations Plan and Risk and Resiliency Assessment address es wildfire zones, specifically within the City’s water infrastructure.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-6

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Forest Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City Forestry Master Plan was adopted in 2017 and applies to City -maintained plantings and provides historical background, design and management and community participation.

Climate Action Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: One of t he City Council goals is to consider a plan to reduce greenhouse gas by a minimum of 40 percent by 2030 and 80 percent by 2050 to meet or exceed the state goals. The City’s Climate and Environmental Action Plan is expected to be considered in FY 2022-23.

Emergency Management Planning Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City’s Water Emergency Operations Plan was adopted in June 2021. Thousand Oaks Municipal Code Title 4 Section 404.01 describes the City emergency organization, functions and authorities.

Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) Yes No No No Comment: In December 2017 the City contracted for the completion of a City facilities security for the two City Theaters. In September 2019, a similar assessment was completed for the Civic Arts Plaza/City Hall, both libraries, Municipal Service Center and the Hill Canyon Treatment Plant. The City completed a Risk and Resiliency Assessment in December 2020.

Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: The City’s Water Emergency Operations Plan was adopted in June 2021, which includes a section on Disaster Recovery Continuity of Operations Plan Yes Yes Yes No
Comment: The City’s Water Emergency Operations Plan was adopted in June 2021 which includes a section on Continuity of Operations.

Public Health Planning No Yes Yes No
Comment: The City’s Water Emergency Operations Plan was adopted in June 2021, which includes a section on public health which as managed by the Ventura County Public Health Department.

Table 10-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does the City issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Public Works Department, Community Development Department Does the City have the ability to track permits by hazard area? Yes Does the City have a buildable lands inventory? No

Table 10-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes- City Council approval of application/acceptance and award by U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes-City Council approval.

Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes-City Council and voter approval.

User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes City Council approval and Proposition 218 protest ballot.

Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes City Council and voter approval.

Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes City Council and voter approval.

Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes City Council approval.

Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas No
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes City Council approval of application/acceptance and award by State Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes City Council approval.

Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-7
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Other Yes
If yes, specify: Incur debt through Lease Revenue Bonds with City Council approval.

Public-Private Partnerships with City Council approval.

Table 10-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development Department & Public Works Department. Senior Planners, Senior Engineers and Division Managers.

Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development Department, Building and Safety Division plan checkers and inspectors Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development Department and Public Works Department. Senior Planners, Senior Engineers and Division Managers.

City staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
Surveyors Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division City personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works Department and Finance Department, IT Division Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency Services Manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works Department, Emergency Services Manager.

Grant writers Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works, Community Development, Finance & Library Departments—The City has several staff in multiple departments that are skilled in writing and administering state and federal grant funded programs.

Table 10-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Does City have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Does City have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Does City have hazard mitigation information available on your website? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Hazard mitigation is part of the City’s Emergency Management Program administered by the Public Works Department, which includes the posting of the City’s current Hazard Mitigation Plan Does City use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The City utilizes several electronic community newsletters as well as Social Media for Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Does City have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? No Does City have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: Social media posts, newsletters and the City website Does City have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The Cities and County of Ventura all subscribe to VC Alert, a mass notification system for local and statewide emergency warnings, incidents and hazards.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-8
Table 10-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance Criterion Response
What City l department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Department Who is your City floodplain administrator? (department/position) Jim Taylor, Senior Civil Engineer, Public Works
Are any certified floodplain managers on staff for your City? Yes; Jim Taylor, Senior Civil Engineer What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? February 11, 2010 Does the City floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Exceeds If exceeds, in what ways? Pursuant to Thousand Oaks Municipal Code Ordinance (TOMC) 1995-20, the City ensures newly- developed building pads are protected from a 100-year flooding event, regardless of whether the location is within a FEMA NFIP-designated floodplain
When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact? Salomon Miranda, California DWR
April 24, 2018
Does the City have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed?
No
Are any Risk MAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes If no, state why.

Does the City floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
No
Does the City participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? No How many flood insurance policies are in force in the City? a 336 What is the insurance in force? $109,948,800
What is the premium in force? $253,564
How many total loss claims have been filed in the City? a 62 What were the total payments for losses? $341,390
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Table 10-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 95-2367314 N/A
DUNS No. Yes 055751937 N/A
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule No N/A N/A Public Protection (VCFPD) Yes 03/3X 12/21/18
Storm Ready Yes N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready No N/A N/A

Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-9
Table 10-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Technical Capacity
City-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Medium Comment: Staff and City Council are aware of potential climate change impacts and actions to address these issues will be included in the General Plan update and the City’s Climate and Environmental Action Plan.

City -level monitoring of climate change impacts Medium Comment: Staff and the City Council are aware of potential climate change impacts and actions to address these issues will be included in the General Plan update and Climate and Environmental Action Plan.

Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities High Comment: The City has capacity internally and the ability to engage consultants for specialized tasks.

City -level capacity for development of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory High Comment: The City has an internally developed GHG inventory.

Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Medium Comment: The City’s General Plan will include Sustainability components throughout the document and is being developed in coordination with the City’s Climate & Environmental Action Plan Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Medium Comment: The City is a member of the Ventura County Regional Energy Alliance which addresses climate change issues within Thousand Oaks and Ventura County.

Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes Medium Comment: On January 12, 2021 the City Council meeting directed staff to develop a Climate and Environmental Action Plan that exceeds the state goals. Concurrently, the General Plan is being updated to include strategies and recommendations related to climate change mitigation.

Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts Medium Comment: Staff has drafted green-house gas mitigation strategies after hosting four stakeholder meetings and additional community events to receive recommendations and input from the public.

Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Medium
Comment: Staff has drafted the strategies now after hosting four stakeholder meetings and additional community events to receive recommendations and input from the public.

Champions for climate action in local government departments Medium Comment: The City Public Works Department established an internal green team of employees from City departments to assist in the development and rollout of internal green policies.

Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Medium Comment: The City Council adopts goals annually and environmental leadership is always included as shown by the following goal. “Provide and enhance essential infrastructure to ensure the goals and policies of the City’s General Plan are carried out and the City retains its role and reputation as a leader in protecting the environment and preserving limited natural resources.” The City Council also approved participation in the Clean Power Alliance at the 100% renewable level which dramatically lowered GHG emissions.

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Medium Comment: The City is supportive of cost-effective environmental initiatives.

Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Low Comment: The City has local authority over housing, water resources and land use issues.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-10
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratinga
Public Capacity
Local resident’s knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Medium Comment: Thousand Oaks residents and business owners are knowledgeable and engaged.

Local resident’s support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comment: Thousand Oaks residents are informed and active on climate and environmental issues.

Local resident’s capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: The City’s Climate & Environmental Action Plan documents residents’ interests and priorities.

Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: Many residents have the resources to make GHG reduction and resiliency reduction measures at home. However, Thousand Oaks also has an aging population with many seniors on a fixed income and unable to complete home improvements on their own.

10.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future. Resources listed at the end of this annex were used to provide information on integration. The progress reporting process described in Volume 1 of the hazard mitigation plan will document the progress of hazard mitigation actions related to integration and identify new opportunities for integration.

10.5.1 Existing Integration
Integration has been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following local plans and programs:
• City Emergency Operations Plan—Adopted in 2020, this Plan describes the City ’s preparedness, response, mitigation and recovery from local and national emergency incidents • City General Plan—Scheduled for adoption in FY 2022-23, this Plan describes the long-term goals, policies and development of Thousand Oaks, including a Safety Element that addresses hazard mitigation.
• City Climate & Environmental Action Plan—Scheduled for adoption in FY 2022-23, this Plan describes the City ’s on -term strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions , reduce air pollution and improve public health.
• Building Code—The City routinely updates the Thousand Oaks Municipal Code (TOMC) and as part of a review of the hazard mitigation in the Building Section of the TOMC. • Stormwater Management—The City is part of a Countywide Stormwater Pollution Management Plan and when possible the Cities and County of Ventura collaborate upon local stormwater management with hazard mitigation policies.

Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-11
• Post-Disaster Recovery—The City addresses disaster recovery in its Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), which includes hazard mitigation as part of the Plan. • Growth Management—The General Plan addresses future growth in Thousand Oaks and during the update, hazard mitigation is incorporated into the final Plan. • Site Plan Review—The Community Development Department and the Public Works Department jointly consider hazard mitigation issues as part of each project review. • Environmental Protection—Hazard mitigation is part of the City’s review of programs, policies and projects as they relate to land, air, water and waste. • Flood Damage Protection—All existing and proposed development projects are reviewed to address existing and future hazards.
• Disaster Debris Plan—The County has a Disaster Debris Plan and the City addressees’ disaster debris in its Emergency Operations Plan in addition to hazard mitigation. • Floodplain Management— The City EOP addresses flooding as well as the TOMC which is updated routinely
• Urban Watershed Plan—As part of a 2021 update, urban watershed policies and the City’s program was updated, and hazard mitigation issues are part of that review. • Wildfire Protection Plan— The City’s EOP includes a wildfire protection element that includes hazard mitigation.
• Forest Management Plan—The 2017 adopted plan addresses City-maintained plantings, background, design and management. Hazard mitigation will continue to be part of the Plan.

10.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and program s that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:
• Countywide Stormwater Pollution Control Plan—This Plan describes how the Cities and County of Ventura will reduce pollution of local waterways. The integration of this Plan with hazard mitigation includes a review of policies and programs of both plans to ensure consistency and compliance.
• Urban Water Management Plan - This Plan describes the City ’s long-term water resource and planning principles for reducing water use. The integration of this Plan with hazard mitigation includes a review of policies and programs of both plans to ensure consistency and compliance. • Economic Development Strategic Plan—This Plan was developed as a policy guide for guiding the City’s short, medium and long-term economic development planning. The integration of this Plan with hazard mitigation includes a review of policies and programs of both plans to ensure consistency and compliance.

Acting to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-12

10.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

10.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 10-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Table 10-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event FEMA Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Wind/PSPS Event N/A 1/20 $2 million
Hill Fire DR 4407 11/8/18 -11/9/18 $1 million
Woolsey Fire DR 4407 11/8/18-11/9/18 $8 million
Borderline Active Shooter N/A 11/18/18 $5 million
Winter Storm Event DR 4353 12/4/17- 1/31/18 $2 million
Springs Fire DR 5024 5/2/13 – 5/11/13 $10 million
Wildwood I Fire N/A 1995 $ 500,000
Northridge Earthquake DR 1008 1/17/94 $6 million
Green Meadow Fire N/A 10/26/93 – 11/3/93 $12 million
Sherwood Fire N/A 1985 $ 1 million
Dayton Canyon Fire N/A 10/25/82 $4 million
Winter Storm Event N/A 2/21/80 $2 million
Winter Storm Event N/A 2/15/78 $1.5 million
Winter Storm Event N/A 1/26/69 $200,000
Winter Storm Event N/A 12/7/65 $100,000
Wind/PSPS Event N/A 1/20 $2 million

10.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 10-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Table 10-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Landslide 51 High
2 Wildfire 36 High
3 Earthquake 32 Medium
4 Severe Storm 24 Medium
5 Severe Weather 24 Medium
6 Flooding 18 Medium
7 Dam Failure 12 Low
8 Drought 9 Low
Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-13

10.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for Thousand Oaks. Available Thousand Oaks-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 5 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: N/A • Number of Repetitive-Loss Properties or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties mitigated: N/A Other Noted Vulnerabilities
The following jurisdiction-specific issues have been identified based on a review of the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, and other available resources:
• Urban Area Flooding—Urban area flooding of specific neighborhoods in Thousand Oaks is an ongoing hazard that continues to be addressed through the City’s Capital Improvement Program. The Public Works Department has identified hazard priorities and through City, State and Federal funding resources, many of the known hazards are being mitigated. Each project includes a public outreach component before, during and after the completion of each project. • Power Outages—Scheduled and un-scheduled SCE power outages continue to be a hazard in Thousand Oaks, especially during excessive heat and wind. The Public Works Department has implemented a Red Flag-PSPS Policy that includes the use of permanent and portable back-up generators at critical City facilities. The City also encourages residents and business owners to secure back-up power.

Mitigation actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

10.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 10-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

10.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 10-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 10-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 10-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-14
Table 10-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
TO 1—Develop a water conservation public outreach program to increase awareness about the drought, fines and penalties for overuse and methods for conserving water.

Comment: The Public Works Department developed a public outreach program over the last decade that includes a monthly e- newsletter to over 10,500 recipients and use of Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. The Sustainability Division in the Public Works Department maintains the City’s Water webpage which provides updates related to drought conditions, fines and penalties for overuse and strategies for conserving water. The City finished its Automatic Meter Reader Upgrade in June 2021 which provides customer access to water consumption data and monitoring of customer water leaks. The City’ s annual
Arbor/Earth Day event includes water conservation booths from all three local water purveyors. During periods of significant water shortage, the City hosts monthly meetings with the three local water purveyors to coordinate programs and messaging. The City is also a member of the California Data Collaborative and has access to a dashboard that identifies high water users in Thousand Oaks that have accepted water rebates. Currently the City is preparing a Climate and Environmental Action Plan, which includes a water conservation component. The plan is being developed in conjunction with
an update to the City’s General Plan and it will be CEQA qualified. Several stakeholder meetings were held in 2021 and the Plan is expected to be considered by the City Council in 2023.

TO 2—Adopt emergency water conservation measures and/or water conservation ordinance to reduce irrigation.

Comment: The City’s Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) was adopted by City Council in June 2021. Municipal code update conservation measures (3 tier to 6 tier) November 2021. Update of water conservation levels from 3 to 6 tiers with Water Shortage Contingency Plan and municipal code updates.

TO 3—Evaluate City bridges for structural, seismic, functional, and safety adequacy.

Comment: Caltrans performs biennial evaluation of all City and State’s bridges for structural, seismic, functional and safety adequacy.

Caltrans provides inspection reports and repair and maintenance recommendations for each bridge that was inspected. In November 2020 Caltrans inspected City of Thousand Oaks bridges and rated them to indicate deficiencies, structural adequacy, safe load carrying capacity and general condition.

TO 4—Update Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Master Plan with seismic improvements, including design, integration of new Programmable Logic Controllers and communication systems at City pump stations, reservoirs, and turnouts.

Comment: CI 5284 SCADA Upgrades—New SCADA program, update of seismic equipment programmable logic controllers and programing. New communications system. Project completion target date: June 2022.

TO 5—Remove and/or repair the interior of reservoir tanks and perform analysis, identify causes, and mitigate hazards to ensure tanks achieve seismic standards. 
Comment: Water reservoirs are inspected and cleaned every 5 years and rehabilitated every 20-25 years. Rehabilitation project priorities include 2019 Lang Ranch Reservoir, 2020 Tara Reservoir Seismic upgrades, ventilation and structural safety were addressed at these sites and all reservoir rehabilitation projects. As part of CIP 5284, SCADA Upgrades

Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-15
Table 10-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action CTO-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslides, Wildfire, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Dam Failure New & Existing 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 19 City Public Works Department
City Community
Development Department
High Grant
Funding- FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Ongoing
Action CTO-2—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including Urban Water Management Plan, General Plan Update, Climate & Environmental Action Plan Hazards Mitigated Flooding, Earthquakes, Climate Change New & Existing 4, 8, 9, 11, 19 City Public Works
Department
City Community
Development Department
Low Staff Time, General
Fund
Ongoing
Action CTO-3—Actively participate in the plan maintenance protocols outlined in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslides, Wildfire, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Dam Failure, Drought New & Existing 9, 10, 11 City Public Works
Department
City Community
Development Department
Low Staff Time, General
Fund
Short-term
Action CTO-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements that include enforcing the City flood damage prevention ordinance, participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates, and provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New & Existing 8, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 19 Public Works Ventura County Water Protection District
Low Staff Time, General
Fund
Ongoing
Action CTO-5—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including but not limited to the following projects:
• CI 5395, Groundwater Utilization Project—Alternative source of water. • CI 5450, Emergency Water Interconnects—2 new interconnects with California American Water Service (Adrian Drive & Avenida de los Arboles).

Hazards Mitigated: Drought, Earthquake
New & Existing 1, 13, 14, 19 City Public Works
Department
Low Staff Time, General
Fund
Short-term
Action CTO-6—Purchase generators for critical facilities and infrastructure that lack adequate backup power, including the following projects:
• CI 5292, La Granada Reservoir Improvements—Redundant supply pumps, emergency fire pump (Pump #3) and emergency backup generator installed at La Granada Reservoir.
• CI 5454, Pressure Reducing Stations—1 new PRS & existing upgrade. Water supply redundancy, reduced pumping. • CI 5452, Lone Oak Emergency Generator—Install new generator at Lone Oak Pump Station with an automatic transfer switch and connection to SCADA System.
• CI 5520, Site Improvements at Reservoir and Pump Stations—Erbes Road Emergency backup generator.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquakes, Flooding, Landslide, Severe Weather, Wildfires New and Existing 2, 8, 10, 19 City Public Works
Department
Community Development
Department
Grant
Funding- FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Short-term
Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-16
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action CTO-7—Maintain wildfire hazard fuel reduction program for areas that have been identified with overgrown or dead brush, trees and weeds to reduce the potential for tree-to-tree ignition. Ensure that a “maintenance now” component to provide continued fire resistance is part of the program. (Coordinates with Ventura County Fire Protection District Action VFP-6 and Conejo Recreation and Parks District Action CRP-1)
Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New & Existing 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11,
13, 14, 15, 18, 19
VCFPD

City of Thousand Oaks,
COSCA (Conejo Open
Space Conservancy
Agency), Conejo
Recreation and Parks
District (CRPD), CAL FIRE
& USDA
Medium Grant
Funding- FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMAP and
HMGP), Staff Time &
General Funds
Ongoing
Action CTO-8—The City is developing plans to install two City Hall emergency power battery backup systems. Two other emergency backup power systems include the Erbes Road Pump Station Battery Back-Up Project and the Pederson Battery Back Up Project. Both projects are funded by state HMGP funding.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslides, Wildfire, Earthquake, Severe Storms, Severe Weather, Flooding, Dam Failure New and Existing 1, 6, 11, 19 City Public Works
Department
VCPWA-WP Low Grant
Funding- FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
and General Fund
Short-term
Action CTO-9— The Lake Eleanor (Banning) Dam was built in 1889 is operated by COSCA and is 37 feet high and has a storage capacity of 128-acre-feet. Dam failure would be a flood risk for the Westlake community and has a sentiment load that cannot be released downstream. The reduction of water storage volume would help mitigate the hazard potential of the Dam.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquakes, Flooding, Severe Weather New and existing 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 14, 15,
16, 17, 19
City Public Works
Department
COSCA, CRPD Low Grant
Funding- FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Long
Term
Action CTO-10—Community outreach program for wildfire safety. Home losses associated with wildfires. COSCA contracts with the Ventura Regional Fire Safe Council to provide educational outreach and services promoting wildfire safety. These include webinars on fire safety, defensible space, and home hardening. Also offered are Home Ignition Zone assessments for homeowners in COSCA’s service area. Currently, these are funded through COSCA Board appropriations for funding from COSCA’s Woolsey Fire Recovery Fund.

Hazards Mitigated: Wildfire
New and Existing 1, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 City Community
Development
COSCA, CRPD Low Grant
Funding- FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMAP and
HMGP), Cal-OES &
Utility Settlement
Ongoing
Action CTO-11—Westlake Boulevard Flood Damage Mitigation. Install retaining walls and upgrade the drainage inlet along the west side of Westlake Boulevard at Cloverleaf Street to mitigate debris and mud flows from adjacent hillsides from entering the roadway.

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquakes, Flooding, Severe Weather.

New and Existing 4, 14, 11, 15, 16, 19 City Public Works Department
N/A Medium General Fund, Grant
Funding- FEMA HMA
(BRIC, FMAP and
HMGP)
Ongoing
Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-17
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency Support Agency Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timelinea
Action CTO-12- Continue implementation of City Drainage Protection Program. Positive drainage away from structures is achieved in accordance with the City’s adopted building codes development discharges to be safely conveyed to stable channels and/or dispersed into natural channels via energy dissipators/rip-rap to avoid scour of unstable areas in accordance with TOMC 1995-20 Section 4 (Commercial/Industrial) and Section 5 (Residential).

Hazards Mitigated: Dam Failure, Earthquake, Flooding, Severe Weather New and Existing 1, 11, 15, 16, 19 City Public Works
Department
City Community
Development Department
Low General Fund Ongoing
Action CTO-13—Continue to participate in Countywide FEMA Coordination by meeting quarterly to discuss program enhancements, studies, and other floodplain matters.

Hazards Mitigated: Flooding
New and Existing 1, 8, 10, 13 City Public Works
Department
N/A Low General Fund Ongoing
a. Short-term = Completion within 5 years; Long-term = Completion within 10 years; Ongoing= Continuing new or existing program with no completion date
Acronyms used here are defined at the beginning of this volume.

Table 10-15. Mitigation Action Priority
Action #
# of
Objectives
Met Benefits Costs
Do Benefits
Equal or
Exceed Cost?
Is Project
Grant-
Eligible?
Can Project Be Funded
Under Existing
Programs/ Budgets?
Implementation
Prioritya
Grant
Pursuit
Prioritya
1 7 High High Yes Yes No High High
2 5 High Low Yes No Yes High Low
3 3 Medium Medium Yes No Yes Medium Low
4 7 High Low Yes No Yes Low Low
5 4 High Medium Yes No Yes Medium Low
6 4 High Medium Yes Yes Yes Medium High
7 12 High Low Yes Yes Yes High High
8 4 Medium High Yes Yes No Medium Medium
9 10 High Low Yes Yes Yes High High
10 6 Low Low Yes Yes Yes Low Medium
11 5 Medium Low Yes Yes Yes Low Medium
12 5 Low Low Yes No Yes Low Low
13 4 Low Low Yes No Yes Low Low
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of priorities.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 10-18
Table 10-16. Analysis of Mitigation Actions
Action Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea
Hazard
Type Prevention
Property
Protection
Public
Education &
Awareness
Natural
Resource
Protection
Emergency
Services
Structural
Projects
Climate
Resilience
Community
Capacity
Buildingb
High-Risk Hazards
Landslide CTO-6, 11 CTO-1, 2, 6 CTO-1, 3, 5 CTO-6, 8 CTO-5, 6, 8 CTO-1, 5 CTO-3, 8 Wildfire CTO-
6, 7, 8, 10
CTO-
1, 3, 6, 7, 10
CTO-
7, 10
CTO-
1, 7
CTO-6, 8,
10 CTO-3, 6, 7 CTO-10 CTO-3, 7, 10
Medium-Risk Hazards
Earthquake CTO-2, 3, 6, 8, 9 CTO-1, 2, 6,
8, 9
CTO-5, 10 CTO-1, 2, 5, 9,
11, 12
CTO-1, 2, 6,
8, 9
CTO-1, 2, 3,
8, 9, 12
CTO-5, 7,
9, 11
CTO-1, 2, 3,
8, 12
Severe
Storms
CTO-3, 6, 8, 11 CTO-1, 3, 6,
8 CTO-1 CTO-8 CTO-1, 6, 8 CTO-1, 3, 6
Severe
Weather
CTO-3, 6, 9, 11,
12 CTO-1, 6, 9,
11, 12
CTO-10, 13 CTO-1, 9, 12 CTO-1, 6, 8,
11 CTO-1, 6, 8,
11, 12
CTO-9 CTO-1, 3, 9,
12 Flooding CTO-2, 3, 4 CTO-1, 2, 4,
8, 9
CTO-7, 11 CTO-1, 2, 9,
11, 12
CTO-6, 8,
11, 12
CTO-1, 2, 6,
8, 9, 11, 12
CTO-2, 9,
11, 12, 13
CTO-1, 2, 3,
4, 9, 12, 13
Low-Risk Hazards
Dam
Failure
CTO-11, 12 CTO-1, 3, 6,
8, 9, 11, 12
CTO-9 CTO-1, 8, 9 CTO-1, 6, 8 CTO-1, 6,
11, 12
CTO-8, 9 CTO-1, 3, 6,
8 Drought CTO-5 CTO-5 CTO-3
a. See the introduction to this volume for explanation of mitigation types. b. N ote that the jurisdiction did not identify a need for expansion of financial capabilities, based on existing capabilities. The intent of this hazard mitigation plan is to expand the financial capability of the jurisdiction.

10.9 PUBLIC OUTREACH
Table 10-17 lists public outreach activities for Thousand Oaks which includes citywide communications and civic engagement activities for City departments, the press, and community members. Public outreach includes:
• City Websites
• Social Media
• Emergency Communications
• Media Relations
• Citywide Branding
• Press Releases
• Community Relations
• City Newsletters
• TOTV—Government Access Television
• Community Attitude Survey
Item No.7D

10. City of Thousand Oaks
10-19
Table 10-17. Local Public Outreach
Local Outreach Activity Date
Number of People
Involved
City Emergency Management E-Newsletter 6/29/21 1,100 subscribers City Sustainability E-Newsletter & Blog 6/29/21 10,400 subscribers City Scene E-Newsletter 7/1/21 1,500 subscribers
Hazard Mitigation Description/Survey Link on City Website 7/1/21 N/A Chamber of Commerce E-Newsletter 8/21/21 2,500 subscribers American Public Works Association, Ventura County Chapter 8/22/21 900 subscribers

10.10 INFORMATION SOURCES USED FOR THIS ANNEX
The following technical reports, plans, and regulatory mechanisms were reviewed to provide information for this annex.
• Thousand Oaks Municipal Code—The municipal code was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration. • Emergency Operations Plan—The EOP was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration.
• Thousand Oaks General Plan—This plan is being updated and is scheduled to be adopted by the City in FY 2022-23. Several sections of the Plan, including the Safety Element and its relation to the Climate and Environmental Action Plan were referenced in this Hazard Mitigation Plan. • Climate Action & Environmental Plan—This plan was reviewed for the full capability assessment and for identifying opportunities for action plan integration.

10.11 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
The City transitioned to a new solid waste hauler (Athens) on January 1, 2022.The new residential and commercial hauler provides improved collection services and has added organics collection and composting. In addition, Athens offers pickup of household hazardous waste (HHW) from residences citywide. A new service that will reduce illegal HHW disposal and improve the City’s recovery of unwanted chemicals out of the waste stream and homes.

The addition of residential HHW curbside supplements the existing City HHW facility at 2010 Conejo Center Drive, which offers free drop-off of HHW to Thousand Oaks residents and unincorporated county residents every Friday 9 am – 1 pm. Small businesses also use the facility 1-3 pm and pay for the cost of disposal further reducing the illegal disposal of toxic chemicals into the waste stream.

In November 2021 the City adopted a Water Shortage Contingency Ordinance and Resolution for a 15 percent voluntary water conservation level.

Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!. !. !.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«34
¬«23
¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
!. Food, Water, Shelter
!. Health and Medical
!. Safety and Security
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Thousand Oaks
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Item No.7D

!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!. !.!. !.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!. !.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!. !.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.!.!.!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.!.!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.!.
!.
!. !.!.
!. !.
!.!.
!.!.
!.
!.
!.
!.
!.!.!.
!.!.
!.!.

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«118
¬«23
£¤101
!. Communications
!. Energy
!. Hazardous Material
!. Transportation
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Data Sources: Ventura Co., VCFD,
Casitas MWD, Calleguas MWD,
City of Camarillo, CA Energy
Commission, Cal Trans, EPA,
HIFLD, Esri
Thousand Oaks
Critical Facilities (1 of 2)
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CA DWR, Esri
Thousand Oaks
Dam Failure
Inundation Areas
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Combined Inundation
Areas
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Thousand Oaks
NEHRP Soil Class
±
01 .530.75
Miles
C (Dense soil/soft rock)
D (Stiff soil)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
Esri
Thousand Oaks
Liquefaction Susceptibility
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Liquefaction zone
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«23
¬«1
¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Thousand Oaks
100-Year Probabilistic
Earthquake Scenario
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Thousand Oaks
Oak Ridge M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«23
¬«1
¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Thousand Oaks
Pitas Point M7.12
Earthquake Scenario
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
V (Moderate/Very Light)
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
VIII (Severe/Moderate-Heavy)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Thousand Oaks
San Cayetano M7.16
Earthquake Scenario
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
VI (Strong/Light)
VII (Very Strong/Moderate)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«23
¬«1
¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
USGS, Esri
Intensity scale described as:
(perceived shaking / potential damage)
Thousand Oaks
S. San Andreas M8.03
Earthquake Scenario
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Mercalli Intensity Scale
V (Moderate/Very Light)
VI (Strong/Light)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
FEMA, Esri
Thousand Oaks
FEMA Flood Hazard Areas
±
01 .530.75
Miles
1% Annual Chance
Flood (100-Year)

0.2% Annual Chance
Flood (500-Year)
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«23
¬«1
¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CGS, Esri
Thousand Oaks
Susceptibility to
Deep-Seated Landslides
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Low
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

Moorpark
Simi Valley
Camarillo
Thousand Oaks
¬«118
¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
23 ¬«
1 ¬«
34 ¬«
23 ¬«
118
¬«
23 £¤101
Data Sources: Ventura Co.,
CAL FIRE, Esri
Thousand Oaks
Wildfire Hazard
Severity Zones
±
01 .530.75
Miles
Moderate
High
Very High
Major Roads
Selected City
Incorporated Cities
County Boundary
Item No.7D

11-1

11. CITY OF VENTURA

11.1 LOCAL HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM
Primary Point of Contact Alternate Point of Contact
Daniel Wall, Emergency Services Manager
501 Poli St.

Ventura, CA 93001
Telephone: 805-223-1030
email: [email protected]
Barry Fisher, Deputy City Manager
501 Poli St.

Ventura, CA 93001
Telephone: 805-223-6873
Email: [email protected]
This annex was developed by the local hazard mitigation planning team, whose members are listed in Table 11-1.

Table 11-1. Local Mitigation Planning Team Members
Name Title
Peter Gilli Director, Community Development
Neda Zayer Deputy Director, Community Development
Jonathan Wood Permit Services Manager, Planning Development Phil Nelson Director, Public Works
Mary Joyce Ivers Deputy Director, Public Works
Jeff Hereford Principal Civil Engineer
Cody Stults Environmental
Susan Rungren General Manager Ventura Water
Linda Sumansky Director, Ventura Water Pure
Brett Reed Fire Marshal, Ventura Fire Department

11.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE

11.2.1 Location and Features
The city of San Buenaventura is in Ventura County, California. The boundaries generally extend from Santa Barbara to Los Angeles along state route 101, the city, encompassing an area of 32.09 square miles. A California coastal community with its phenomenal climate, friendly people and spectacular coastline make Ventura a locale for those who appreciate and enjoy the outdoors.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 11-2

11.2.2 History
Ventura is a coastal City, set against undeveloped hills and flanked by two free-flowing rivers, has been inhabited for thousands of years. Originally European explorers encountered the Chumash, while traveling along the Pacific coast. They witnessed the ocean navigation skill of the native people and their use of the abundant local resources from sea and land. In 1782, the eponymous Mission San Buenaventura was founded nearby, where it benefitted from the water of the Ventura River. The town grew around the mission compound and incorporated in 1866. The development of nearby oil fields began in the 1920s during which many designated landmark buildings were constructed. The mission and these buildings are at the center of a downtown that have become a cultural, retail, and residential district and visitor destination.

11.2.3 Governing Body Format
There are 7 members of the Ventura City Council, each serving a four-year term. Starting with the 2018 Election, four (4) Councilmembers were elected by Districts with the remaining three (3) Councilmembers elected by Districts in 2020. While elected by Districts, each member represents the interests of the City as a whole. The Ventura City Council assumes responsibility for the adoption of this plan; City Administration will oversee its implementation.

11.3 CURRENT TRENDS

11.3.1 Population
According to the California Department of Finance, the population of Ventura as of January 2020 was 106,276. Since 2010, the population has decreased at an average annual rate of 0.09 percent.

11.3.2 Development
Development trends in the City of Ventura are focused on infill development, versus new land/hillside development. The City is looking towards main corridors for increased density and mixed-use development to accommodate the balance of residential and commercial needs. Adaptative reuse of industrial properties is also being considered for last mile distribution centers. Increase housing demands with available property will likely result in more multi-family projects. More flexible zoning will increase commercial and industrial development.

Table 11-2 summarizes development trends in the period since the preparation of the previous hazard mitigation plan, as well as expected future development trends.

11.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT
This section describes an assessment of existing capabilities for implementing hazard mitigation strategies. The introduction at the beginning of this volume of the hazard mitigation plan describes the components included in the capability assessment and their significance for hazard mitigation planning.

Item No.7D

11. City of Ventura
11-3
Table 11-2. Recent and Expected Future Development Trends Criterion Response
Has your jurisdiction annexed any land since
the preparation of the previous hazard
mitigation plan?
No
Is your jurisdiction expected to annex any
areas during the performance period of this
plan?
Yes
If yes, describe land areas and dominant
uses.

A 25.37-acre property located at the western terminus of Thille Street, just east of the Highway 101/ Highway 126 interchange and 75-acre property adjacent to Valentine road.

If yes, who currently has permitting authority
over these areas? County of Ventura
Are any areas targeted for development or
major redevelopment in the next five years? Yes
If yes, briefly describe, including whether any
of the areas are in known hazard risk areas Most of the redevelopment is occurring within the downtown area and the major corridors such as Main Street and Thompson Blvd. The projects are occurring on infill sites that are building multi-story mixed use or residential projects. Some of the development in the downtown area is close to fault lines. Most of the redevelopment areas are generally outside of the high fire areas.

How many permits for new construction were
issued in your jurisdiction since the
preparation of the previous hazard mitigation
plan?
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Single Family 56 255 60 7 4
Multi-Family 31 59 11 14 36
Other (commercial, mixed use, etc.) 1 1 5 0 4
Total 88 315 76 21 44
Provide the number of new-construction
permits for each hazard area or provide a
qualitative description of where development
has occurred.
• Special Flood Hazard Areas: 36
• Landslide: 12
• High Liquefaction Areas: 62
• Tsunami Inundation Area: 21
• Wildfire Risk Areas: 398
Describe the level of buildout in the
jurisdiction, based on your jurisdiction’s
buildable lands inventory. If no such
inventory exists, provide a qualitative
description.

Development trends in the City of Ventura are focused on infill development, (versus new land/hillside development). Looking towards main corridors for increased density and mixed-use development to accommodate to balance residential and commercial needs. Adaptative reuse of industrial properties for last mile distribution. Increase housing demands with available property will likely result in more multi-family projects.

More flexible zoning will increase commercial and industrial development.

The findings of the assessment are presented as follows:
• An assessment of planning and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 11-3. • Development and permitting capabilities are presented in Table 11-4. • An assessment of fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 11-5.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 11-4
• An assessment of administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 11-6. • An assessment of education and outreach capabilities is presented in Table 11-7. • Information on National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 11-8.
• Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 11-9. • The community’s adaptive capacity for the impacts of climate change is presented in Table 11-10.

Table 11-3. Planning and Regulatory Capability

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Codes, Ordinances, & Requirements
Building Code Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Sec. 12.115.010, Adoption of California Building Code, 2019 Edition. (Ord. No. 2019-011, § 2, 10-7-19) Zoning Code Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Division 24 of the Municipal Code (Code 1971, updated numerous times, last updated Ord. No. 2020-021, § 1, 8-3-2020) Subdivisions Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Division 26 of the Municipal Code (Code 1971, § 8211 through 8231.18, updated numerous times, last updated Ord. No. 2015-006, 6-8-15)
Stormwater Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Chapter 8.600, Stormwater Quality Management Ordinance 99-1 adopted 1-11-99 Post-Disaster Recovery Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Emergency Management Sec. 2.370.080., Emergency response May 2021 Real Estate Disclosure Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Division 24 of the Municipal Code (Code 1971, updated numerous times, last updated Ord. No. 2020-021, § 1, 8-3-2020) Growth Management Yes No No Yes
Comment: Save Open Space and Agricultural Resources initiative adopted 1995. Sec. 24.550.010 (Code 1971, § 15.850.010) Site Plan Review Yes No No Yes
Comment: Division 24 of the Municipal Code (Code 1971, updated numerous times, last updated Ord. No. 2020-021, § 1, 8-3-2020) Environmental Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Sec. 2R.450.750 (Res. No. 2002-57, § 4, 9-9-02) Flood Damage Prevention Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Floodplain Regulations, Municipal Code Part 4 Chapter 12.430 ( Ord. No. 2021-001, § 1, 1-11-21 ) Emergency Management Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Emergency Management Sec. 2.370.080, Emergency response May 2021 Climate Change No No No Yes
Comment: None
Planning Documents
General Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Is the plan compliant with Assembly Bill 2140? No
Comment: Undergoing comprehensive General Plan that will bring the Plan into compliance with AB 2140 Capital Improvement Plan Yes No Yes Yes
How often is the plan updated? Annually
Comment: Current plan covers 6-year period from 2020-2026 Item No.7D

11. City of Ventura
11-5

Local
Authority
Other Jurisdiction
Authority
State
Mandated
Integration
Opportunity?
Disaster Debris Management Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: Ventura County Disaster Recovery Plan, Adopted by BOS in April 2019 Floodplain or Watershed Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The Ventura County Watershed Protection creates and maintains countywide plans Stormwater Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The City of Ventura has joined other jurisdictions to form the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program and is named as a co-permittee under a revised countywide municipal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for stormwater discharges issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in 2010 (Order R4-2010-0108) Urban Water Management Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: 2020 Urban Water Management Plan approved June 14, 2021 Habitat Conservation Plan Yes Yes No Yes
Comment: The city does not have an existing habitat plan Economic Development Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: Existing Gap plan developed 2018, funded Econ Dev plan request for proposals anticipated 2022 Spring Shoreline Management Plan Yes Yes Yes Yes
Comment: General Plan. Surfers Point Managed Retreat Project Chapter 24.310, Coastal Protection (CP) Overlay Zone Community Wildfire Protection Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Current effort to develop a plan due Jan 2022
Urban Forest Management Plan Yes No No Yes
Comment: City of San Buenaventura Master Tree Plan, November 9, 2020 Climate Action Plan Yes No No No
Comment: Preparation and adoption of a Climate Action Plan is part of the comprehensive General Plan update that is scheduled to be adopted in 2023.

Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Emergency Operations Plan was published and approved May 10, 2021 Threat & Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment (THIRA) Yes No No Yes Comment: The city does not have a complete THIRA.

Post-Disaster Recovery Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Incorporated into the EOP May 2021
Continuity of Operations Plan Yes No Yes Yes
Comment: Incorporated into the EOP June 2021
Public Health Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: County of Ventura Health Care Agency Public Health Emergency Response Plan (ERP), 2019 Other—Tsunami Plan No Yes Yes Yes
Comment: The County of Ventura has an existing plan that describes each City role and has been adopted locally. A revision of this document is required within the coming year 2022.

Table 11-4. Development and Permitting Capability
Criterion Response
Does your jurisdiction issue development permits? Yes
If no, who does? If yes, which department? Community Development Does your jurisdiction have the ability to track permits by hazard area? Yes Does your jurisdiction have a buildable lands inventory? No Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 11-6
Table 11-5. Fiscal Capability
Financial Resource Accessible or Eligible to Use?
Community Development Block Grants Yes
Capital Improvements Project Funding Yes
Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes Yes
User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Yes If yes, specify: Water, Sewer, Electrical Services fees for new construction Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Yes
Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Yes
Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard-Prone Areas No
State-Sponsored Grant Programs Yes
Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Yes

Table 11-6. Administrative and Technical Capability
Staff/Personnel Resource Available?
Planners or engineers with knowledge of land development and land management practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Community Development / Chief Building Official and Public Works / Principal Civil Engineer Engineers or professionals trained in building or infrastructure construction practices Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/ Principal Civil Engineer, Community Development/Planner/inspector Planners or engineers with an understanding of natural hazards Yes If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/ Principal Civil Engineer, Community Development/Planner/inspector Staff with training in benefit-cost analysis Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Finance / Finance Director Surveyors Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Public Works/ Surveyor
Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: Finance and Technology Department GIS/ Senior GIS Analyst Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Emergency manager Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: City Manager’s Office, Emergency Services Manager Grant writers Yes
If Yes, Department /Position: City Manager’s Office and Multiple other departments

Item No.7D

11. City of Ventura
11-7
Table 11-7. Education and Outreach Capability
Criterion Response
Do you have a public information officer or communications office? Yes Do you have personnel skilled or trained in website development? Yes Do you have hazard mitigation information available on your website? Yes If yes, briefly describe: On our website, there are references to the County OES website wherein centralized training and outreach can be found related to hazard mitigation education.

Do you use social media for hazard mitigation education and outreach? Yes If yes, briefly describe: On our website, there are references to the County OES website wherein centralized training and outreach can be found related to hazard mitigation education.

Do you have any citizen boards or commissions that address issues related to hazard mitigation? Yes If yes, briefly describe: The city of Ventura is currently developing a CERT team Do you have any other programs in place that could be used to communicate hazard-related information? Yes If yes, briefly describe: VCALERT, EVERBRIDGE, Email, Mail and Door Knocking Do you have any established warning systems for hazard events? Yes If yes, briefly describe: VCALERT, Emergency Notification System, VCSOES, WEA system

Table 11-8. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance Criterion Response
What local department is responsible for floodplain management? Public Works Who is your floodplain administrator? (department/position) Public Works/Senior Engineer Are any certified floodplain managers on staff in your jurisdiction? Yes What is the date that your flood damage prevention ordinance was last amended? January 11, 2021 Does your floodplain management program meet or exceed minimum requirements? Meets When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact? 12-4-17 Thomas Fire
Does your jurisdiction have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed? No
Are any Risk MAP projects currently underway in your jurisdiction? No If so, state what they are. FEMA has notified us that they will be studying the Ventura and Santa Clara River flooding
Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your jurisdiction? Yes Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program?
No
Does your jurisdiction participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? No If no, is your jurisdiction interested in joining the CRS program? No How many flood insurance policies are in force in your jurisdiction? a 471 What is the insurance in force? $161.828,500
What is the premium in force? $374,421
How many total loss claims have been filed in your jurisdiction? 62 What were the total payments for losses? $660,191
a. According to FEMA statistics as of March 31, 2021

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 11-8
Table 11-9. Community Classifications
Participating? Classification Date Classified
FIPS Code Yes 00611165042 N/A
DUNS # Yes 039974761 N/A
Community Rating System No N/A N/A
Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule No N/A N/A Public Protection Yes ISO3 2019
Storm Ready No N/A N/A
Firewise No N/A N/A
Tsunami Ready Yes N/A 2012

Table 11-10. Adaptive Capacity for Climate Change
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratings
Technical Capacity
Jurisdiction-level understanding of potential climate change impacts Low Comment:

Jurisdiction-level monitoring of climate change impacts Low Comment:

Technical resources to assess proposed strategies for feasibility and externalities Low Comment:

Jurisdiction-level capacity for development of greenhouse gas emissions inventory Medium Comment: City of Ventura has a current Greenhouse Gas inventory.

Capital planning and land use decisions informed by potential climate impacts Medium Comment: Community Development/Public Works
Participation in regional groups addressing climate risks Medium Comment: Public Works / Environmental Sustainability—The City has partnerships with a number of regional organizations that support greenhouse gas reduction efforts, including the Ventura County Regional Energy Alliance, Clean Power Alliance, and Tri- County Regional Energy Network (3CRen). The City has also partnered with the Beach Erosion Authority for Clean Oceans and Nourishment (BEACON), Surfrider and other organizations to complete the Surfers Point Managed Retreat Project.

Implementation Capacity
Clear authority/mandate to consider climate change impacts during public decision-making processes Low Comment:

Identified strategies for greenhouse gas mitigation efforts Low Comment: Draft Energy Action Plan completed in July 2021 Identified strategies for adaptation to impacts Medium
Comment: The current update to the General plan has addressed strategies for adaptation to impacts.

Champions for climate action in local government departments Low Comment: Environmental Sustainability leads the effort on behalf of the city.

Political support for implementing climate change adaptation strategies Low Comment: City of Ventura city council is supportive as well as local community-based organizations and environmental organizations.

Financial resources devoted to climate change adaptation Low Comment:

Local authority over sectors likely to be negative impacted Unsure Comment:

Item No.7D

11. City of Ventura
11-9
Criterion
Jurisdiction
Ratings
Public Capacity
Local residents’ knowledge of and understanding of climate risk Low Comment:

Local residents’ support of adaptation efforts Medium
Comment: Residents are supportive of adaptation efforts, but when implementation become restrictive, they are reticent to advance the course of action.

Local residents’ capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: The vulnerable populations within the city may not be able to relocate out of a flood-prone area (homeless encampments), but residents with more resources may be more able to rebuild, retrofit, or otherwise protect their home.

Local economy current capacity to adapt to climate impacts Medium Comment: The City has water shortage surcharge rates in addition to the base water rates. These surcharges help to fund the water budget during drought stages.

Local ecosystems capacity to adapt to climate impacts Low Comment:
a. High = Capacity exists and is in use; Medium = Capacity may exist but is not used or could use some improvement; Low = Capacity does not exist or could use substantial improvement; Unsure= Not enough information is known to assign a rating.

11.5 INTEGRATION REVIEW
For hazard mitigation planning, “integration” means that hazard mitigation information is used in other relevant planning mechanisms, such as general planning and capital facilities planning, and that relevant information from those sources is used in hazard mitigation. This section identifies where such integration is already in place, and where there are opportunities for further integration in the future.

11.5.1 Existing Integration
Some level of integration has already been established between local hazard mitigation planning and the following other local plans and programs:
• City of Ventura: General Plan
• City of Ventura: Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)
• Ventura County: Operational Area Emergency Operations Plan

11.5.2 Opportunities for Future Integration
The capability assessment in this annex indicates opportunities to integrate this mitigation plan with other jurisdictional planning/regulatory capabilities. Capabilities were identified as integration opportunities if they can support or enhance the actions identified in this plan or be supported or enhanced by components of this plan. The capability assessment identified the following plans and programs that do not currently integrate hazard mitigation information but provide opportunities to do so in the future:

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 11-10
• City of Ventura: General Plan—This comprehensive effort is underway and will be integrated into this effort to be compliant with AB2140.
• City of Ventura: Evacuation plan—This comprehensive effort is predicated on grant funds and will be initiated in FY20/21 and will encompass a multi-hazard perspective and routes with appropriate stakeholder/community input.
• Visit Ventura: Tourist and Visitor disaster plan—This effort will be a collaboration between the following: Visit Ventura, Chamber of Commerce, Hoteliers and City Emergency Management.
• City of Ventura: Citizen Emergency Response Team (CERT)—This effort will be a collaboration between the following: CERT volunteers, City staff, community-based organizations, with the existing DRAFT CERT team manual.

Taking action to integrate each of these programs with the hazard mitigation plan was considered as a mitigation action to include in the action plan in this annex.

11.6 RISK ASSESSMENT

11.6.1 Jurisdiction-Specific Natural Hazard Event History Table 11-11 lists past occurrences of natural hazards for which specific damage was recorded in this jurisdiction Other hazard events that broadly affected the entire planning area, including this jurisdiction, are listed in the risk assessments in Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan.

Table 11-11. Past Natural Hazard Events
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Wind Event N/A January 19, 2021 Strong surface high pressure in the Great Basin helped to generate a moderate Santa Ana wind event across Southern California.

Wildfire N/A 2020 Strong surface high pressure building in the Great Basin generated strong and gusty Santa Ana winds across sections of Ventura and Los Angeles counties.

COVID-19 DR-4482 January 20, 2020.

Continuing
Ongoing
High Wind N/A 2020 Strong surface high pressure in the Great Basin along with strong north to northeast flow aloft generated strong Santa Ana winds across Ventura and Los Angeles counties. North to northeast wind gusts up to 83 mph were reported in the mountains while gusts to 59 mph were reported across the coastal plain.

Wildfire N/A 2019 Strong surface high pressure building in the Great Basin generated strong and gusty Santa Ana winds across sections of Ventura and Los Angeles counties.

Wind Event N/A 2018 Strong surface high pressure building in the Great Basin generated strong and gusty Santa Ana winds across sections of Ventura and Los Angeles counties.

Item No.7D

11. City of Ventura
11-11
Type of Event
FEMA
Disaster # Date Damage Assessment
Winter Storm N/A 2018 Strong surface high pressure in the Great Basin helped to generate a moderate Santa Ana wind event across Southern California. Strong northeast winds were reported across the mountains and valleys of Ventura and Los Angeles Counties.

Tornado N/A 2018 A powerful winter storm brought significant rain, snow and wind to the area. Rainfall totals ranged from 1 to 2 inches across coastal and valleys areas with 2 to 4 inches in the foothills and mountains. With snow levels dropping to between 2500 and 3500 feet, significant snowfall was reported in the mountains (up to 1 to 2 feet) and even the Antelope Valley (4 to 8 inches). Numerous road closures due to winter storm conditions were reported, including Interstate 5 through the Grapevine as well as Highways 14 and 138. Additionally, thunderstorms generated a waterspout over the coastal waters as well as a very weak tornado over Ventura Harbor.

Otherwise just some minor nuisance flooding was reported.

Wildfires,
Flooding,
Mudflows, and
Debris Flows
DR-4353 December 4, 2017-
January 31, 2018
Strong surface high pressure building in the Great Basin generated strong and gusty Santa Ana winds across sections of Ventura and Los Angeles counties. North to northeast wind gusts up to 73 mph were reported. During this event, the Thomas Fire ignited across Ventura County, eventually spreading into Santa Barbara County.

The Thomas Fire burned 500+ homes in the City of Ventura and destroyed infrastructure including roads, utilities, and utility distribution networks including telecom.

Severe Storm DR-1267 January 7 – 11, 2005 Flooding and debris flows Northridge
Earthquake
DR-1008 January 17 –
November 30, 1994
Power and communications disruptions, damage to structures

11.6.2 Hazard Risk Ranking
Table 11-12 presents a local ranking of all hazards of concern for which this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments. As described in detail in Volume 1, the ranking process involves an assessment of the likelihood of occurrence for each hazard, along with its potential impacts on people, property, and the economy. Mitigation actions primarily target hazards with high and medium rankings.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 11-12
Table 11-12. Hazard Risk Ranking
Rank Hazard Risk Ranking Score Risk Category
1 Landslide 33 High
2 Earthquake 32 Medium
3 Severe Storm 24 Medium
4 Severe Weather 24 Medium
5 Flooding 18 Medium
6 Wildfire 18 Medium
7 Dam Failure 12 Low
8 Sea Level Rise 12 Low
9 Tsunami 10 Low
10 Drought 9 Low

11.6.3 Jurisdiction-Specific Vulnerabilities
Volume 1 of this hazard mitigation plan provides complete risk assessments for each identified hazard of concern. This section provides information on a few key vulnerabilities for this jurisdiction. Available jurisdiction-specific risk maps of the hazards are provided at the end of this annex.

Repetitive Loss Properties
Repetitive loss records are as follows:
• Number of FEMA-identified Repetitive-Loss Properties: 4 • Number of FEMA-identified Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties: N/A • Number of Repetitive-Loss or Severe-Repetitive-Loss Properties that have been mitigated: N/A Other Noted Vulnerabilities
The following jurisdiction-specific issues have been identified based on a review of the results of the risk assessment, public involvement strategy, and other available resources:
• Unreinforced Masonry and Soft Story Structures—Ventura has several unreinforced masonry buildings and Soft Story buildings within the city limits. These buildings are subject to severe damage or structural collapse during a moderate to severe earthquake. • Street and Urban Flooding—There are numerous areas of the city that flood to varying degrees during periods of high rain. The effects of this flooding range from street closures to damage to property, vehicles and buildings.
• Power Outages/Emergency Power—Local power outages including public safety power shutoffs (PSPS) have resulted from high winds and storm conditions as well as from the effects of wildland fire in the region. Many key city buildings including the Main City Hall and Council Chambers buildings have no back-up power or emergency generators. • Debris Flows—Following heavy rains and winter storms, substantial debris flows have occurred in the Santa Clara River, Ventura River, as well as other local streams and culverts. Debris flows following wildland fires are particularly bad and can require removal of material from streams, streets, culverts and beaches.

Item No.7D

11. City of Ventura
11-13
• Liquefaction Potential—Nearly the entire City of Ventura is in a “Liquefaction Zone”. The effects and damage caused by seismic activities can be amplified resulting in increased damage to buildings and infrastructure.
• Homeless Population—A significant number of persons commonly defined as “Homeless” live in the Santa Clara River and other undeveloped areas. During wildland fires, storms, and flooding these individuals are at great risk.
• Tsunami Awareness and Notification—Ventura has a large visitor and tourist population who may not be aware of the tsunami risk.

Mitigation actions addressing these issues were prioritized for consideration in the action plan in this annex.

11.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN ACTIONS
Table 11-13 summarizes the actions that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared.

Table 11-13. Status of Previous Plan Actions
Removed;
Carried Over to Plan
Update
Action Item Completed
No Longer
Feasible
Check if
Yes
Action # in
Update
OA 4—Relocate or reinforce bike trails, parking lots and other beach access amenities away from the shoreline to restore the beach/shoreline in sea-level rise/coastal erosion areas.
 VEN-1
Comment: The Surfers Point Managed Retreat Project Phase 1 has been completed. The Phase 2 design and permitting is nearly complete. The City is pursuing grants for construction. Seaside Wastewater Transfer Station relocation in exploratory phase.

OA 9—Identify potentially vulnerable public and private utility systems including electric, gas, oil, water, sewer and communication. Upgrade vulnerable systems to ensure the operation and timely restoration of essential systems to reasonable levels of service.
 VEN-11
Comment: City of Ventura has multiple projects that meet criteria Southern California Edison has identified and is in the process of hardening their utility infrastructure. SoCalGas is also upgrading their facilities in the city. Water and Wastewater utilities are assessed through current Master Plan evaluations and projects developed for City CIP to address vulnerabilities.

Comment: Due to staffing changes this action was not performed  VEN-22
OA 19—Maintain vegetation management program that provides vegetation management services to elderly, disabled, or low-income property owners who lack the resources to remove flammable vegetation from around their homes.  VEN-17
Comment: Due to limited funding this initiative was not completed.

11.8 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN
Table 11-14 lists the identified actions, which make up the hazard mitigation action plan for this jurisdiction. Table 11-15 identifies the priority for each action. Table 11-16 summarizes the mitigation actions by hazard of concern and mitigation type.

Item No.7D

Ventura County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan 11-14
Table 11-14. Hazard Mitigation Action Plan Matrix
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency
Support
Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action VEN-1—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase or relocation of structures located in hazard areas, prioritizing those that have experienced repetitive losses and/or are located in high- or medium-risk hazard areas.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11,
16 Public Works High Grant Funding-FEMA HMA (BRIC,

FMA, HMGP)
Long Term
Action VEN-2—Incorporate consideration of the FEMA 100-year tide and sea level rise, and climate change-driven extreme storms, into land use planning, shoreline development and dredging. This includes new policies by local jurisdictions, and County and City actions regarding their General Plans, visit Ventura tourist plan, Climate-related Plans, and the development applications.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storm, Flooding, Sea Level Rise New & Existing 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10,
15, 17, 19
Community
Development
Public Works Medium Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action VEN-3—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances and programs that dictate land use decisions in the community, including Emergency Operations Plan, Community Climate Action plan, downtown specific plan, Citywide Evacuation Plan, General Plan, and ongoing plan maintenance
Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami, Drought
New & Existing 1, 2, 10, 11, 12,
15, 16, 19
Community
Development
City Manager Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action VEN-4—Continue to maintain good standing and compliance under the NFIP through implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, meet the NFIP requirements: Enforce the flood damage prevention ordinance, participate in floodplain identification and mapping updates, and provide public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Dam Failure, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10,
11, 13, 14, 15,
17, 18, 19
Public works Low Staff Time, General Funds Ongoing
Action VEN-5—Identify and pursue strategies to increase adaptive capacity to climate change including but not limited to the following:
• Adopt a Climate Action Plan to reflect new State legislation, changing priorities, and environmental sustainability and greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction policies and goals.
• Adopt modifications to existing plans and procedures to meet climate change issues and impacts.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Sea Level Rise, Drought New & Existing 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 19
Community
Development
(for the Climate
Action Plan)
Public Works
Ventura Water Medium Water and Sanitation Funds Short Term Action VEN-6—Advance long-term resilience to the population (including homeless individuals) to sea level rise and extreme storms for the communities and critical assets adjacent to San Buenaventura Beach, Santa Clara River, Ventura River, and nearby areas of the shoreline, as well as provide environmental, recreation, community/connectivity enhancements where possible.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Sea Level Rise, Tsunami Existing 1, 3, 4, 9, 10, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 19
City Manager
office
Medium General Funds, Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, FMA, HMGP)
Long Term
Action VEN-7—City Energy, Power, and Communication Systems Reliability. Ensure adequate emergency power and fuel at critical City facilities, including communications equipment, for continuity of government and services. Reliability will include but is not limited to purchasing stationary generators for critical facilities.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 2, 7, 10, 19 City Manager Medium EMPG, DHS, Grant Funding-FEMA

HMA (BRIC, HMGP), CDBG
Mitigation, General Funds
Short Term
Item No.7D

11. City of Ventura
11-15
Benefits New or
Existing Assets Objectives Met Lead Agency
Support
Agency
Estimated
Cost Sources of Funding Timeline
Action VEN-8—Identify appropriate facility/location for of the City’s Emergency Operations Center to ensure state of readiness and designate a back-up Emergency Operations Center and associated systems. This should include the rebuilding or replacement of the current facility to maintain the Emergency Operations Capacity.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Tsunami New & Existing 1, 8, 12, 17, 19

City Manager N/A Low EMPG, DHS, BRIC, CDBG Mitigation,
General Funds
Short Term
Action VEN-9—Consider participation in incentive-based programs such as Tree City, TsunamiReady, and StormReady.

Hazards Mitigated: Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Tsunami New 1, 2, 19 City Manager N/A Low Staff Time, General Funds Short Term Action VEN-10—Develop and implement a program to capture perishable data after significant events (e.g., high water marks, preliminary damage estimates, damage photos, snapshot in time status) to support future mitigation efforts including the implementation and maintenance of the hazard mitigation plan
Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Tsunami New 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10,
11, 14, 15, 16,
17, 18, 19
City Manager NA Medium EM Budget, Staff Time Short Term Action VEN-11—Identify and upgrade potentially vulnerable public and private utility systems, including electric, gas, oil, sewer, and communication, to ensure the operation and timely restoration of essential systems to reasonable levels of service. Including equipment, and critical facilities, (e.g. pump stations, generators, tide gates, stream gages, open channel, and culvert/pipeline infrastructure), to Improve community resilience and response to emergencies.

Hazards Mitigated: Landslide, Earthquake, Severe Storm, Severe Weather, Flooding, Wildfire, Dam Failure, Tsunami New & Existing 9, 10, 11, 13 Public Works NA Medium Grant Funding-FEMA HMA (BRIC, HMGP), City Capital Project Funding
Long-term
Action VEN-12—Support green infrastructure projects that enhance resiliency to natural disasters and incorporate green design elements into hazard mitigation projects where feasible.

Thousand Oaks City CouncilAugust 30, 2022

Thousand Oaks City Council
August 30, 2022