Agenda packet — Turlock City Council, December 10, 2024 (part 4 of 7)

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15378 (Project) of the CEQA guidelines because it consists of “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment”.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Turlock does hereby determine the Amendment No. 4 for Task Order No. 2 is exempt from the provisions of CEQA in accordance with Section 15378 and approve Amendment No. 4 for Task Order No. 2 under the terms of the Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2024- 112) with CCME, Inc. (Merced, California office) for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the City of Turlock’s Roads Initiative Program in the amount of $41,776.00 to be funded by Fund 115 “Measure A – Roads” for Bid Package 1 for City Project No. 23-067 as “CCME CM Task Order No. 2 for City Project No. 23-067, Bid Package 1.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Turlock this 10th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

NOT PARTICIPATING:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:
__________________________
Julie Christel, City Clerk,
City of Turlock, County of Stanislaus,
State of California

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TURLOCK
IN THE MATTER OF DETERMINING THE } RESOLUTION NO. 2024- AMENDMENT NO. 5 FOR TASK ORDER NO. 3 }
IS EXEMPT FROM THE PROVISIONS OF CEQA }
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 15378 AND }
APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. 5 FOR TASK }
ORDER NO. 3 UNDER THE TERMS OF THE }
MASTER AGREEMENT (CITY CONTRACT NO. }
2024-111) WITH NV5, INC. (FRESNO, }
CALIFORNIA OFFICE) FOR CONSTRUCTION }
MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES }
FOR THE CITY OF TURLOCK’S ROADS }
INITIATIVE PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF }
$54,151.24 TO BE FUNDED BY FUND 115 }
“MEASURE A – ROADS” FOR BID PACKAGE 1 }
FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 23-068 AS “NV5 CM }
TASK ORDER NO. 3 FOR CITY PROJECT }
NO. 23-068, BID PACKAGE 1” }
}
WHEREAS, under a separate resolution on February 27, 2024, the City Council approved a Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2024-111) for Construction Management and Inspection Services for Roads Program CIP Projects (“Agreement”) between the City of Turlock (“City”) and NV5, Inc. (“Professional”); and WHEREAS, Construction Management and Inspection Services comprise three (3) components: Pre-Construction, Construction Management and Inspection, and PostConstruction; and WHEREAS, Agreement stipulates that the scope of services and fees associated with specific projects will be agreed upon through task orders approved under the terms of Agreement by a written amendment to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, City desires that Professional provide “Pre-Construction” services for Bid Package 1 for City Project No. 23-068 as “NV5 CM Task Order No. 3 for City Project No. 23-068, Bid Package 1;” and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3 provides for the scope of services and associated fees for said services; and
WHEREAS, the cost of said services is estimated to be $54,151.24; and WHEREAS, funding is available from Fund 115 “Measure A – Roads” account number 115-10-115.43327 “Construction Management” for costs associated with said City Project; and
WHEREAS, this action is not subject to the provisions of the California Resolution No. 2024-

Page 2 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Turlock does hereby determine the Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3 is exempt from the provisions of CEQA in accordance with Section 15378 and approve Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3 under the terms of the Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2024- 111) with NV5, Inc. (Fresno, California office) for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the City of Turlock’s Roads Initiative Program in the amount of $54,151.24 to be funded by Fund 115 “Measure A – Roads” for Bid Package 1 for City Project No. 23-068 as “NV5 CM Task Order No. 3 for City Project No. 23-068, Bid Package 1.”
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Turlock this 10th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

NOT PARTICIPATING:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:
__________________________
Julie Christel, City Clerk,
City of Turlock, County of Stanislaus,
State of California

Page 1 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-112, Amendment No. 4 for Task Order No. 2 AMENDMENT NO. 4 FOR TASK ORDER NO. 2
Under the Terms of the

MASTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TURLOCK
and
CCME, INC.
for

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES
City Contract No. 2024-112
City Project No. 23-067; Bid Package 1
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 for Task Order No. 2 under the terms of City Contract No. 2024-112 is entered into by and between the CITY OF TURLOCK, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and CCME, INC., a California corporation (“Professional”), on this ______ day of ___________ 2024 (the “Effective Date of Task Order No. 2”). City and Professional may be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” or individually as “Party.” There are no other parties to this Amendment No. 4.

WHEREAS, the Parties hereto previously entered into a Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2024-112) dated February 27, 2024, for Construction Management and Inspection Services for Roads Program Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, Construction Management and Inspection Services comprise three (3) components: Pre-Construction, Construction Management and Inspection, and PostConstruction; and WHEREAS, Agreement stipulates that the scope of services and fees associated with specific projects will be agreed upon through task orders approved under the terms of Agreement by a written amendment to the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, City desires that Professional provide Pre-Construction services for Bid Package 1 for City Project No. 23-067 as “CCME CM Task Order No. 2 for City Project No. 23- 067, Bid Package 1;” and
WHEREAS, Pre-Construction services will commence shortly after approval of the proposed Amendment No. 4 and will continue through the start of construction; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 4 for Task Order No. 2 provides for the scope of services and associated fees for said City Project.

Page 2 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-112, Amendment No. 4 for Task Order No. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Exhibit E, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby added to the Agreement.

2. Recital B of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

B. Professional has made a proposal to City to provide such professional services. A description of the services Professional proposes to provide is included in the Scope of Services in Exhibits A through E attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Services”). City desires to retain Professional to perform the Services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

4. Recital C of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

C. The Parties anticipate that one or more projects for Services shall be determined through creation of a Task Order as a City-requested modification of services under Section 5.2 of this Agreement which shall be approved by written amendment to this Agreement. The Parties shall outline the schedule or timeline for providing the Services agreed upon under each Task Order (“Completion Schedule”), which shall be included in one or more written amendments to this Agreement. Such Completion Schedule is included in Exhibit E.

5. Recital D of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

D. The Parties shall outline the rates and method of payment to Professional for its performance of the Services under this Agreement as determined under each Task Order (“Compensation Schedule”), which shall be included in one or more written amendments to this Agreement. Such Compensation Schedule is included in Exhibit E.

6. Section 5 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

5.1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Professional shall provide City the Services described in Exhibits A through E. Any request for Services not included in Exhibits A through E will be considered a request for additional or modified Services (“Modification” or “Modifications”).

Professional shall not receive additional compensation for any Modification of the Services unless the Parties agree otherwise in a writing executed by both Parties.

5.2. City Requested Modification of Services. City may, by written order, authorize Modifications to the Services described in Exhibits A through E. If such Modifications cause an increase in the cost or time required for performance of Professional’s Services, the Parties shall enter into a written amendment to this Agreement to adjust the Services and the compensation to be paid to Professional and, if necessary, amend the Completion Schedule or Compensation Schedule. The Services, Completion Schedule, or Compensation Schedule shall not be revised unless City and Professional mutually agree to a written amendment to this Agreement reflecting such revisions, additional compensation, time for performance or such other terms or conditions mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

Page 3 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-112, Amendment No. 4 for Task Order No. 2

7. Section 6 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

6.1. Amount, Time and Manner of Payment for Professional Services. City shall pay Professional according to the rates and timing set forth in the Compensation Schedule for each Task Order within each Amendment to the Agreement. Each Compensation Schedule shall include an exhibit based on Exhibit 10-H of Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Professional will be allowed to include an amount for the anticipated salary increases as calculated per Exhibit 10-H. City’s total compensation to Professional shall not exceed the cumulative amount resulting from each Task Order with each approved Amendment to the Agreement. The compensation for Amendment No. 4 shall not exceed Forty-One Thousand SevenHundred-Seventy-Six Dollars and Zero Cents ($41,776.00) (“Maximum Payment”), unless the Parties mutually agree in writing otherwise.

8. Execution and Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously, and in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The Parties agree that this Amendment and any other documents to be delivered in connection herewith may be electronically signed utilizing services such as DocuSign and Nitro Sign, or by transmitting signatures in pdf or similar format, and that any electronic signatures appearing on this Agreement or such other documents are the same as handwritten signatures for the purposes of validity, enforceability, and admissibility.

9. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Term of the Agreement.
[Signatures on Following Page]

Page 4 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-112, Amendment No. 4 for Task Order No. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment No. 4 to be executed by and through their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

PROFESSIONAL
CCME, INC., a California corporation
By:

Ramon Montes De Oca, Vice President
Date
CITY
City of Turlock, a California
municipal corporation
By:

Reagan M. Wilson, City Manager
Date:

APPROVED AS TO SUFFICIENCY:

By:

Christopher Fisher,
Municipal Services Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

George A. Petrulakis, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By:

Julie Christel, City Clerk
11/18/2024
CM and Inspection Roads Program CIP Projects Page 1
City of Turlock

SCOPE OF WORK
CCME, Inc. (CCME) will furnish a Project Manager, Construction Manager / Resident Engineer, and associated personnel including inspectors, arborists, material testers, and office engineers for the duration of this project. The CCME construction manager will be responsible for all matters related to the consultant team and report directly to the City’s project manager. CCME will also coordinate, when needed, regarding project issues and critical items with the City’s designer, other City consultants, third parties, or departments.

Items not specifically requested in the RPF are denoted with an asterisk.

A Pre-Construction Services
A.1 Bid Package Review, Constructability Review and Bidding Assistance- CCME will provide a constructability review of the design bid package at the designated 65% and 100% completion stages to identify any potential conflicts, constructability issues, or specifications that may be unclear or may result in change orders. CCME will review the Designer’s schedule and associated working days and provide comments. CCME will also aid the City in bid advertisement, help provide clarification to any bidder’s questions and if necessary, prepare addendums to the bid package.

A.2 Schedule Review - Once the specific road packages are identified and plans are nearing completion, CCME will prepare a tentative schedule that will identify anticipated construction sequencing, utility relocations, long lead items, and anticipated submittals to be received from the Contractor.

A.3 Draw Schedule - CCME will use a street by street breakdown of anticipated quantities, and the Contractors baseline and their three-week look ahead to forecast quantity and pay estimates ahead of the progress payment date. CCME will provide the initial forecast schedule based on the Designers schedule and working days.

A.4 Contractor Pre-qualification - CCME will take an active role in prequalifying Contractors and verify the specifications include direction to the Contractor to apply with the DIR. CCME will assist or perform the logging of scoring contractors per the criteria outlines in Section D “PRE-QUALIFICATION CRITERIA QUESTIONS AND SCORING” and in conformance with Public Contracting Code 20101.

A.5 CCME will review the documents found in a typical RE Pending file. These documents offer include but are not limited to Plans, quantity calculations, pavement designs, geotechnical reports, permits, and any other pertinent files and will develop a list of any items that may require changes, creates an issue for the project, or needs further investigation. A red-line markups of the project documents will be provided within three weeks of the NTP.

A.6 CCME will document pre-construction conditions of the roadways and adjacent facilities to assist in determining if any additional damage was caused by the Contractor during construction and to have a baseline condition of the roads. The project limits will be photographed and stored on our server until the project records are transmitted to the City.

A.7* CCME will attend the Bid Opening and review bid results for irregularities.

A.8 Project Conference - Attend a meeting between the City and CCME team to coordinate lines of communication and further define the City’s expectations of CCME during the life of the project.

A.9 Pre-Construction Conference - CCME will organize and run a preconstruction meeting with the City, Contractor, Designer, and pertinent subcontractors and stakeholders.

Deliverables: Preconstruction Meeting Agenda, Preconstruction Meeting Minutes, and review of any Contractor submitted preconstruction submittals.

A.10* File management - organize and maintain project files per Caltrans 63 category filing system and any additional federal, state, or city requirements.

CM and Inspection Roads Program CIP Projects Page 2
City of Turlock
Ramon Montes De Oca, PE
Project Manager/
Resident Engineer
Bryce Moore
Materials Testing
Lead (Blackburn)
Additional Resources
Office Engineer
Janae Awoniyi
Kathlien Red
Organizational Chart
Kareem Abonofal, PE
Resident Engineer
Blake Watkins
Arborist
(Blake Watkins LLC)
Materials Testing
Arthur Mills (Blackburn)
Dustan Kliethermes (Blackburn)
Eric Quintana (Blackburn)
Jose Lopez (Blackburn) Inspectors
Branden Anderson
Jaskaran Singh, EIT
Allison Nutting, EIT (Mozamo)
Corinne Burkhard, EIT (Mozamo)

RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL
Bryan Kroeger, MSCE, PE
Principal In Charge/
Construction Manager
Rick Bettencourt
Lead Inspector
Michael Schaffner
Inspector
(Mozamo)
Key
Staff
Key Staff- Bryan Kroeger, Principal In Charge, Construction Manager Registered Civil Engineer #79177, QSD
Bryan has a master’s degree in Civil Engineering from California State University Fresno and 16 years of experience delivering public projects. As a Construction Manager and Resident Engineer, Bryan has worked on all aspects of project delivery including helping with preconstruction permitting issues and utility agreements. Bryan has vast experience working on both the State Highway System as well as Local Roads.

Key Staff - Ramon Montes De Oca, Project Manager, Resident Engineer Registered Civil Engineer #78212, QSD
Ramon has a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. Ramon has over 17 years of experience and, in addition to his PE license, is a Qualified SWPPP Developer/ Practitioner.

Throughout the years, Ramon has been a Structures Representative and Resident Engineer on a variety of Road, Bridge, and retaining wall projects. Ramon is currently assisting on your City of Turlock CIP Roads Projects.

Chris Mcdermott, PE
Resident Engineer
(Mozamo)
CM and Inspection Roads Program CIP Projects Page 3
City of Turlock
Key Staff - Kareem Abonofal, Resident Engineer
Registered Civil Engineer #94485, CMIT
Kareem has a bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from California State University, Fresno and 4 years of experience working on a variety of different heavy infrastructure projects. Kareem has extensive experience working on the California High-Speed Rail Project as well as roadway and bridge projects for different municipalities across the Central Valley. Kareem is a License Professional Civil Engineer and Certified Construction Manager-in-Training.

Key Staff - Rick Bettencourt, Lead Inspector
Richard has 21 years of experience verifying construction quality. As an Inspector, Richard has worked as both Quality Control and Quality Assurance, on projects ranging from small local projects to the $6.5 Billion Bay Bridge Eastern Span Replacement Project. Richard has vast experience working on both the State Highway System and local roadways. Richard is currently inspecting the grinding and paving operations on your City of Turlock CIP Roads Projects.

PROPOSED PERSONNEL
CCME, Inc. (CCME) will furnish a Project Manager, Engineers, office engineers, and an inspector to review plans and specifications for preconstruction services.

Those personnel are as follows:

Project Manager: Ramon Montes De Oca
Review Engineers: Bryan Kroeger, Kareem Abonofal, Juan Zermeno, and Ramon Montes De Oca
Inspector: Rick Bettencourt
Review engineers will review the Plans, Specification, Estimate and any other bid package items for errors, constructability and consistency issues.

Inspector Rick Bettencourt will be used as needed for review package as well as any potential site inspections to confirm existing field conditions are as shown on the plans.

The CCME project manager will be responsible for all matters related to the consultant team and report directly to the City’s project manager.

Bryan Kroeger Construction Manager Ramon Montes De Oca Project Manager Kareem Abonofal Resident Engineer Rick Bettencourt Inspector Levi Willims Office Engineer Blackburn Blake Watkins MozamoNo Sub MarkUp
Hourly Rate $247.68 $247.68 $198.14 $179.39 $61.32
TASK

1.0 CONST. MGMT SER. PRE CON.

1.1 Bid Package Review 2 32 16 50 $11,291.36 $11,291.36

1.2 Schedule Review 2 8 4 14 $3,194.36 $3,194.36

1.3 Draw Schedule 8 8 $1,981.44 $1,981.44

1.4 Contractor Prequalification 8 8 $1,981.44 $1,981.44

1.5 Review RE Pending File 4 8 4 16 $3,689.72 $3,689.72

1.6 Document PreConstruction Condition 4 16 20 $3,860.96 $3,860.96

1.7 Attend Bid Opening 4 8 12 $2,972.16 $2,972.16

1.8 Project Conference 4 8 12 $2,972.16 $2,972.16

1.9 Pre-Construction Conference 8 8 8 24 $5,398.00 $5,398.00

1.10 File Management 8 40 48 $4,434.40 $4,434.40
Subtotal Task 1 0 100 0 48 40 212 $41,776.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,776.00 TOTAL HOURS 24 100 0 48 40 212
OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL COST $5,944 $24,768 $0 $8,611 $2,453 $41,776.00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $41,776.00 Total Prime
Cost
FEE SCHEDULE FOR TURLOCK PROJECT 23-067 - Task 01
Subconsultants
TOTAL
Total COST
Hours
CCME
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed X Subconsultant 2
nd Tier Subconsultant
Consultant
Project No. Contract No.TBD Date 11/7/2024

DIRECT LABOR
Hours
24 100
0 0
48 40
0 0
212

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $17,710.40
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $0.00 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $17,710.40

FRINGE BENEFITS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 0.00% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $0.00

INDIRECT COSTS
f) Overhead (Rate: 114.44%) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $20,267.78 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00%) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $0.00 j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $20,267.78
FIXED FEE (Profit)
q) (Rate: 10.00% ) k) TOTAL FIXED PROFIT [(c) + (j)] x (q)] $3,797.82 l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
1 Included $0.00
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0.00
m) SUBCONSULTANT'S COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1:

Subconsultant 2:
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS $0.00
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l)+(m)] $0.00 TOTAL COST [(c) +(j) + (k) + (n)] $41,776.00
NOTES:

1. Key personnel must be marked with an asterisk (*) and employees that are subject to prevailing wage requirements must be marked with two asterisks (**). All costs must comply with the Federal cost principles. Subconsultants will provide their own cost proposals.

2. The cost proposal format shall not be amended. Indirect cost rates shall be updated on an annual basis in accordance with the consultant's annual accounting period and established by a cognizant agency or accepted by Caltrans.

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

4. Saturday time denoted with tripple asterisk (***), Sunday time denoted with quadrouple Asterisk (****).

Page 1 of 3 ends

Office Engineer Levi Willims
Inspector TBD**
Description of Item
Vehicles
Office Engineer Kathlien
Inspector Rick Bettencourt**
Construction Manager Bryan Kroeger*
Project Manager / RE Ramon Montes De Oca*
Resident Engineer Juan Zermeno
Resident Engineer Kareem Abonofal
SAMPLE COST PROPOSAL 1

COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
CCME, Inc.

Classification/Title Name
City Project 23-067
Prime Consutant
Actual Hourly Rate Total
$43.30 $0.00
$76.05 $3,650.40
$26.00 $1,040.00
$78.00 $0.00
$2,520.00
$10,500.00
$0.00
$0.00
$105.00
$105.00
$89.00
$84.00
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H1
Consultant Contract No. TBD Date 11/7/2024

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$0.00 = $0.00 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $0.00 + = $0.00 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $0.00 + = $0.00 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $0.00 + = $0.00 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $0.00 + = $0.00 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 5 $0.00 + = $0.00 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 212.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 212.0
Year 1 $0.00 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $0.00 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $0.00 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $0.00 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $0.00 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $0.00
= $0.00
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1 This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2 An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology) 3 This assumes that one year will be worked at the rate on the cost proposal before salary increases are granted. 4 Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided. Page 2 of 3

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) 212.0
212.0
Total
212.0
Total Hours
212
Proposed Escalation
3%
3%
3%

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours)

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) 3%
3%
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
Estimated %
212.0
212.0
Total Hours
Cost per Year
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation
Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
0 0
0 (calculated above)
Avg Hourly Rate
(calculated above)
212
0 Estimated hours

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
CCME, Inc.
per Cost Proposal
Direct Labor Subtotal
per Cost Proposal

Page 1 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3 AMENDMENT NO. 5 FOR TASK ORDER NO. 3
Under the Terms of the

MASTER AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TURLOCK
and
NV5, INC.
for

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND INSPECTION SERVICES
City Contract No. 2024-111
City Project No. 23-068; Bid Package 1
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 5 for Task Order No. 3 under the terms of City Contract No. 2024-111 is entered into by and between the CITY OF TURLOCK, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and NV5, INC., a California corporation (“Professional”), on this ______ day of ___________ 2024 (the “Effective Date of Task Order No. 3”). City and Professional may be collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” or individually as “Party.” There are no other parties to this Amendment No. 5.

WHEREAS, the Parties hereto previously entered into a Master Agreement (City Contract No. 2024-111) dated February 27, 2024, for Construction Management and Inspection Services for Roads Program Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Projects (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, Construction Management and Inspection Services comprise three (3) components: Pre-Construction, Construction Management and Inspection, and PostConstruction; and WHEREAS, Agreement stipulates that the scope of services and fees associated with specific projects will be agreed upon through task orders approved under the terms of Agreement by a written amendment to the Agreement; and
WHEREAS, City desires that Professional provide Pre-Construction services for Bid Package 1 for City Project No. 23-068 as “NV5 CM Task Order No. 3 for City Project No. 23-068, Bid Package 1;” and
WHEREAS, Pre-Construction services will commence shortly after approval of the proposed Amendment No. 5 and will continue through the start of construction; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3 provides for the scope of services and associated fees for said City Project.

Page 2 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1. Exhibit F, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby added to the Agreement.

2. Recital B of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

B. Professional has made a proposal to City to provide such professional services. A description of the services Professional proposes to provide is included in the Scope of Services in Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (“Services”). City desires to retain Professional to perform the Services, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

4. Recital C of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

5. Recital D of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

6. Section 5 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

5.1. Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, Professional shall provide City the Services described in Exhibits A through F. Any request for Services not included in Exhibits A through F will be considered a request for additional or modified Services (“Modification” or “Modifications”).

Professional shall not receive additional compensation for any Modification of the Services unless the Parties agree otherwise in a writing executed by both Parties.

5.2. City Requested Modification of Services. City may, by written order, authorize Modifications to the Services described in Exhibits A through F. If such Modifications cause an increase in the cost or time required for performance of Professional’s Services, the Parties shall enter into a written amendment to this Agreement to adjust the Services and the compensation to be paid to Professional and, if necessary, amend the Completion Schedule or Compensation Schedule. The Services, Completion Schedule, or Compensation Schedule shall not be revised unless City and Professional mutually agree to a written amendment to this Agreement reflecting such revisions, additional compensation, time for performance or such other terms or conditions mutually agreed upon by the Parties.

Page 3 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3

7. Section 6 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:

6.1. Amount, Time and Manner of Payment for Professional Services. City shall pay Professional according to the rates and timing set forth in the Compensation Schedule for each Task Order within each Amendment to the Agreement. Each Compensation Schedule shall include an exhibit based on Exhibit 10-H of Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Professional will be allowed to include an amount for the anticipated salary increases as calculated per Exhibit 10-H. City’s total compensation to Professional shall not exceed the cumulative amount resulting from each Task Order with each approved Amendment to the Agreement. The compensation for Amendment No. 5 shall not exceed Fifty-Four Thousand OneHundred-Fifty-One Dollars and Twenty-Four Cents ($54,151.24) (“Maximum Payment”), unless the Parties mutually agree in writing otherwise.

9. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for the Term of the Agreement.
[Signatures on Following Page]

Page 4 of 4 ends

CITY CONTRACT NO. 2024-111, Amendment No. 5 for Task Order No. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment No. 5 to be executed by and through their respective officers thereunto duly authorized.

PROFESSIONAL
NV5, INC., a California corporation
By:

Lori Goodwin, Vice President
Date
CITY
City of Turlock, a California
municipal corporation
By:

Reagan M. Wilson, City Manager
Date:

APPROVED AS TO SUFFICIENCY:

By:

Christopher Fisher,
Municipal Services Director
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

George A. Petrulakis, City Attorney
ATTEST:

By:

Julie Christel, City Clerk
11/20/2024
City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Projects Task Order #3 (Project No. 23-068 Package 1) Pre-Construction Services – Scope of Consultant Services 1

SCOPE OF CONSULTANT SERVICES

CITY OF TURLOCK ROADS PROGRAM CIP PROJECTS
TASK ORDER #3 (PROJECT NO. 23-068)

PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
City of Turlock

DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Provide pre-construction project management services for the City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Project No. 23-068 Package 1.

NV5 shall furnish a licensed Civil Engineer as Resident Engineer during the pre-construction period. NV5 will also provide support staff, as needed, during the pre-construction period.

The Resident Engineer shall be responsible for coordination with the City of Turlock and shall act as the key point of contact with the City. The Resident Engineer shall also be responsible for coordination of the Construction Management staff and will oversee the daily interaction with the Contractor, the City, and other public agencies.

NV5 shall complete the following pre-construction services:

Task 1: Pre-Construction Services
Task 1.1 Constructability Review
Objectives:

1. Achieve a full understanding of the project plans and specifications.

2. Identify potential discrepancies in the contract documents and recommend solutions to the Owner.

Description:

NV5 takes pride in their role in constructability reviews of project plans and specifications prior to advertisement for bids. Our constructability reviews provide an opportunity to offer input from a construction perspective to produce an improved set of plans and specifications and ultimately a more cost-effective project for the Owner. Our experience has shown that these constructability reviews lead to lower bids, reduced owner risks, fewer change orders, and fewer claims.

We utilize an 18-page constructability review spreadsheet that was developed in-house and is routinely updated based on lessons learned from our vast array of project experience. As part of the review process, we will review the plans and specifications to verify that the design as presented is complete and clear, poses no City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Projects Task Order #3 (Project No. 23-068 Package 1) Pre-Construction Services – Scope of Consultant Services 2 construction conflicts, and is economically feasible to build. We review contract documents from the contractor’s point of view. In general, we look for missing details, ambiguous or contradictory information, physical conflicts, and impractical constraints. Some of the general questions we ask are:
• Are the plans complete and free of conflict?
• Is there sufficient information for the contractor to build the project? • Are the staging or traffic handling plans feasible?
• How will the contractor be paid?
In addition to identifying potential issues, we review the plans and specifications in an attempt to identify potential opportunities to accelerate construction or improve the contractor’s efficiencies. We thoroughly review the project staging to see if it can be modified or combined without affecting the overall objectives. We rely on our vast experience working closely with numerous agencies and contractors over the years to develop ideas that will benefit the project.

When potential issues or opportunities are identified, we will work with the City and the project’s designers to develop possible solutions and if necessary, implement plan changes or bid package addenda in a timely manner so as not to delay bid opening.

Deliverables:

Constructability review spreadsheet.

Task 1.2 Contractor Prequalification
Objectives:

1. Manage the contractor pre-qualification process in compliance with DIR’s guidelines.

Description:

NV5 will manage the contractor pre-qualification process using the procedures described in the DIR’s Public Works Pre-Qualification of Contractors process. We will ensure each prospective bidding contractor submits the DIR’s Pre-Qualification of Contractors Model Questionnaire. The questionnaires will be reviewed by the NV5 team, and each contractor will be scored utilizing the DIR’s Public Works Pre-Qualification of Contractors Scoring Worksheet. The results will be shared and reviewed with the City to make the final determination of which contractors are prequalified for the right to bid.

Deliverables:

Public Works Pre-Qualification of Contractors Scoring Worksheets.

Task 1.3 File Review
Objectives:

1. Review project files, including existing plans, quantity calculations, geotechnical reports, pavement design, etc.

Description:

City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Projects Task Order #3 (Project No. 23-068 Package 1) Pre-Construction Services – Scope of Consultant Services 3 During the pre-construction phase, NV5 will review the contract documents, including the plans, specifications, engineer’s estimate, schedule, RE pending file, environmental permits, geotechnical report, pavement design, and any other agreements. Our review will identify required submittals, order of work, any schedule constraints, restricted work windows and overall contract requirements. We will also independently verify estimated quantities for any large dollar bid items such as Hot Mix Asphalt, and identify any discrepancies found. The pavement design reports will be reviewed and compared to the contract documents for each project location to ensure the plans and specifications accurately reflect the design requirements.

Deliverables:

List of submittals.

Summary of any quantity or pavement design discrepancies found.

Task 1.4 Document Existing Conditions
Objectives:

1. Document existing conditions using photographic and video records at all job site locations prior to the start of construction activities.

Description:

Pre-construction documentation is a crucial tool for roadway reconstruction and rehabilitation projects to accurately document existing conditions of the roadways and adjacent improvements prior to the contractor commencing their scope of work. The records help protect the City from any inaccurate claims from adjacent property owners that the project activities damaged their facilities. They also assist in holding the contractor responsible for any damages they cause to adjacent City property, or property of adjacent private residences or businesses. For these specific projects, some items to document include existing conditions of curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveways, mailboxes, landscaping, signs, and street lighting. In addition to the typical street level photographs, we utilize high-definition drone photography to capture a wide snapshot of the jobsite locations to ensure all existing conditions are documented.

Deliverables:

Digital photographs and videos of existing job site conditions, complete with captioned descriptions, locations, and notes.

Task 1.5 Schedule Review
Objectives:

1. Prepare a tentative schedule that identifies construction stages, utility relocations and all items that will be submitted by the Contractor for review and approval.

Description:

NV5 will prepare a project schedule for major construction activities broken into stage construction, sequencing of work and anticipated durations. In addition to the general construction activities, we will include utility relocations by others including notification timelines to meet specification requirements, identify all critical project submittals, and
include any permit and agreement requirements. This schedule will be used in review of the Contractor’s baseline schedule submittal.

City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Projects Task Order #3 (Project No. 23-068 Package 1) Pre-Construction Services – Scope of Consultant Services 4 Deliverables:

Preliminary schedule of construction activities.

Task 1.6 Draw Schedule
Objectives:

1. Develop, and maintain during the construction phase, a construction draw schedule based on the contractor’s construction schedule and forecast cash flow requirements.

Description:

NV5 will prepare a construction draw schedule to assist the City of Turlock with forecasting cash flow requirements. It will be based on the Contractor’s authorized construction schedule and will be updated on a regular basis as needed. NV5 regularly performs this task for many of our clients, including Stanislaus County and Merced County.

Deliverables:

Construction draw schedule.

Task 1.7 Pre-Construction Conference
Objectives:

1. Organize, and conduct, a pre-construction conference with the Contractor, Subcontractors, and City representatives to discuss the work involved, administrative matters, labor compliance, safety and accident prevention.

2. Answer questions from the contractors, and address issues that need to be resolved before work commences.

Description:

The NV5 Team will coordinate and facilitate a preconstruction conference with the construction contractor, subcontractors, the City, utility companies, and other stakeholders after contract approval and before start of work to review the project and discuss coordination efforts. This meeting will be used to establish managerial and administrative procedures with the contractor to ensure efficient startup and execution of the project. The project submittal list will be reviewed, and any time-critical submittals will be identified. Other discussion topics will include labor compliance, safety, and accident prevention. NV5 will prepare and distribute meeting minutes to all attendees, documenting the topics discussed at the preconstruction meeting.

Deliverables:

Written agenda for pre-construction conference, including project submittal list.

Electronic distribution of pre-construction meeting minutes to the attendees.

Task 1.8 Review Contractor Pre-Construction Submittals
Objectives:

City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Projects Task Order #3 (Project No. 23-068 Package 1) Pre-Construction Services – Scope of Consultant Services 5

1. Coordinate, document, and review pre-construction project submittals for their compliance with the project plans and specifications.

Description:

Contract provisions identify specific items to be provided by the contractor prior to the start of construction that are subject to review. When we receive these pre-construction submittals from the contractor, they will be stamped and logged in by date of receipt. The NV5 Team will then review the submittals or forward the submittals to the designer and the City, as appropriate.

A partial list of expected pre-construction submittals includes:
• Construction Schedule
• Traffic Control Plans & Pedestrian Detours
• SWPPP or WPCP
• Safety Program
Deliverables:

Comprehensive log of submittal tracking and response
Submittal review documentation per contract documents
Correspondence of review with status (acceptable, revise and resubmit) Task 1.9 Establish Project Procedures
Objectives:

1. Gain concurrence from the City regarding planned project procedures, tracking tools, construction forms and templates.

2. Provide a concise outline of regular tracking, correspondence and reporting activities with planned frequencies.

Description:

The Resident Engineer will discuss with the City all proposed tracking log templates, correspondence templates and construction forms to be used during administration of the project for review and input. The frequency of regular meetings and reporting needs will be understood based on the City’s needs. We will also discuss correspondence procedures with the project designer, stakeholders, the public and other City staff. Once established, these project procedures
will be summarized through Project Procedures Outline and will be maintained on file and updated as necessary during the project. All findings and conclusions resulting from this task will be conveyed to the project team prior to construction.

Deliverables:

Proposed tracking log templates, correspondence templates, and construction forms.

Project Procedures Outline.

City of Turlock Roads Program CIP Projects Task Order #3 (Project No. 23-068 Package 1) Pre-Construction Services – Scope of Consultant Services 6 Completion Schedule
NV5 shall be bound by the requirements of the Agreement from the start of pre-construction services commencing in January 2025 until the conclusion of pre-construction period at the end of February 2025. Time extensions may result in the need for additional CM services. Overtime, weekend, and holiday work are not anticipated and therefore not included.

In the event that the City Project Manager requires additional pre-construction services above the value established in the attached fee estimate, or the duration exceeds the time period listed above, NV5 will remain onsite and provide continuous pre-construction services. However, these services shall be considered as additional services, are above and beyond the scope and fee estimate of this contract and shall be paid on a cost plus fixed fee basis as set forth by the appropriate hourly wages, mark-up, and profit shown in the attached fee estimate. In addition, should the City request additional services not included in the contract, NV5 can provide those services. They shall also be considered as additional services, to be paid on a cost plus fixed fee basis.

Fee Schedule
Compensation to provide Construction Management services required for the pre-construction phase of the subject construction project as detailed in this Agreement, for the time periods discussed in the previous section throughout the duration of the contract, shall be on a time and materials basis for the necessary personnel and reimbursables at the rates included herein.

Name Brad Riel, PE Kramer Walker, PE John Seymour, PE Neil Novotny, EIT Matt Ramsey TOTAL COST Classification Project Manager Resident Engineer AssistantResident Engineer Project Engineer Inspector (7) Actual Hourly Rate $127.41 $113.43 $85.00 $45.67 $83.10 Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) 134.14% 134.14% 134.14% 134.14% 134.14% Net Fixed Fee 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00% 10.00%
Hourly Billing Rate (1) $328.15 $292.14 $218.92 $117.62 $214.03 Contract Escalation Fee (8) 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%

1.1 CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEW 32 32 20 12

1.2 CONTRACTOR PREQUALIFICATION 4

1.3 FILE REVIEW 8 8 4 4

1.4 DOCUMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS 8 16

1.5 SCHEDULE REVIEW 8

1.6 DRAW SCHEDULE 4

1.7 PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 4 4 4 4

1.8 REVIEW CONTRACTOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION SUBMITTALS 8 32 8

1.9 ESTABLISH PROJECT PROCEDURES 4 4 4 4
Man Hour Subtotal 0 80 80 40 40
Task 1 Subtotal Fees $0.00 $23,371.48 $17,513.67 $4,705.00 $8,561.09 $54,151.24 Notes and Assumptions: Other Direct Costs

1. NV5 employee hourly rates include project-related overhead, profit, safety equipment, vehicles, laptops, and cell phones. Per Diem ($120 per day) - 0 Days $0.00

2. Cost proposal is based on 8-hour work shifts according to the Caltrans 5-Day Working Calendar. Field Supplies $0.00

3. Overtime, weekend, and holiday work is not included. Overtime hours will be paid in accordance with applicable labor law and prevailing wage rates, and are above and beyond the scope and fee of this estimate.

4. Adjustments to this estimate may be required if the actual schedule requires more or less construction management services than proposed. Proposal Total $54,151.24

5. This cost estimate is based on the pre-construction phase of the project being completed between January 1st, 2025 and February 28th, 2025. Time extensions (including weather delays) may result in additional CM services & fees.

6. This estimate is based on the specific scope of work described for the CITY OF TURLOCK ROADS PROGRAM CIP PROJECTS T.O. #3 (PROJECT NO. 23-068 Package 1) - PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.

7. Classifications requiring prevailing wage are subject to the provisions set forth in the latest DIR determination.

8. An escalation fee of 5.0% will be applicable for work completed after 03/31/2025.

Staffing Plan & Fee Proposal for Pre-Construction Services Turlock Roads Program CIP Projects T.O. #3 (Project No. 23-068 Package 1) Prepared for the City of Turlock
TASK I: PRE-CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H1
Cost Proposal
Note: Mark-ups are Not Allowed
Consultant
Project No. 23-068 Package 1 Contract No. 2024-111 Task Order #3 Date 11/12/2024

DIRECT LABOR
Hours Actual Hourly Rate Total
0 $127.41 $0.00
80 $113.43 $9,074.40
80 $85.00 $6,800.00
40 $83.10 $3,324.00
40 $45.67 $1,826.80
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
0 $0.00
240

LABOR COSTS
a) Subtotal Direct Labor Costs $21,025.20
b) Anticipated Salary Increases (see page 2 for calculation) $0.00 c) TOTAL DIRECT LABOR COSTS [(a) + (b)] $21,025.20

FRINGE BENEFITS
d) Fringe Benefits (Rate: 0.00% ) e) Total Fringe Benefits [(c) x (d)] $0.00

INDIRECT COSTS
f) Overhead (Rate: 134.14% ) g) Overhead [(c) x (f)] $28,203.20 h) General and Administrative (Rate: 0.00% ) i) Gen & Admin [(c) x (h)] $0.00 j) Total Indirect Costs [(e) + (g) + (i)] $28,203.20
FIXED FEE (Profit)
q) (Rate: 10.00% ) k) TOTAL FIXED PROFIT [(c) + (j)] x (q)] $4,922.84 l) CONSULTANT'S OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) - ITEMIZE (Add additional pages if necessary) Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total
l) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS $0.00
m) SUBCONSULTANT'S COSTS (Add additional pages if necessary) Subconsultant 1: $0.00
Subconsultant 2: $0.00
m) TOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS $0.00
n) TOTAL OTHER DIRECT COSTS INCLUDING SUBCONSULTANTS [(l)+(m)] $0.00 TOTAL COST [(c) +(j) + (k) + (n)] $54,151.24
NOTES:

3. Anticipated salary increases calculation (page 2) must accompany.

Description of Item
Project Engineer Neil Novtony, EIT
Project Manager Brad Riel, PE
Resident Engineer Kramer Walker, PE*
Inspector Matt Ramsey**
Assistant Resident Engineer John Seymour, PE*
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES)
NV5, Inc.

Classification/Title Name
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H1
Consultant Contract No. 2024-111 Task Order #3 Date 11/12/2024

1. Calculate Average Hourly Rate for 1st year of the contract (Direct Labor Subtotal divided by total hours) Avg Hourly 5 Year Contract
Rate Duration
$21,025.20 = $87.61 Year 1 Avg Hourly Rate
Avg Hourly Rate
Year 1 $87.61 + = $91.99 Year 2 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 2 $91.99 + = $96.58 Year 3 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 3 $96.58 + = $101.41 Year 4 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 4 $101.41 + = $106.48 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Year 5 $106.48 + = $111.81 Year 5 Avg Hourly Rate
Total Hours
per Year
Year 1 100.00% * = 240.0 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 0.00% * = 0.0 Estimated Hours Year 5
Total 100% = 240.0
Year 1 $87.61 * = $21,025.20 Estimated Hours Year 1
Year 2 $91.99 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 2
Year 3 $96.58 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 3
Year 4 $101.41 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 4
Year 5 $106.48 * = $0.00 Estimated Hours Year 5
= $21,025.20
= $21,025.20
= $0.00 Transfer to Page 1
NOTES:
1 This is not the only way to estimate salary increases. Other methods will be accepted if they clearly indicate the % increase, the # of years of the contract, and a breakdown of the labor to be performed each year. 2 An estimation that is based on direct labor multiplied by salary increase % multiplied by the # of years is not acceptable. (i.e. $250,000 x 2% x 5 yrs = $25,000 is not an acceptable methodology) 3 This assumes that the year one rates expire 03/31/25 and salary increases due to escalation are effective 04/01/25. 4 Calculations for anticipated salary escalation must be provided.

Direct Labor Subtotal before Escalation
Estimated total of Direct Labor Salary Increase
240
0 0
0 0
Total Direct Labor Cost with Escalation

4. Calculate Total Costs including Escalation (Multiply Average Hourly Rate by the number of hours) Avg Hourly Rate Estimated hours
Cost per Year (calculated above) (calculated above)
Total

3. Calculate estimated hours per year (Multiply estimate % each year by total hours) Estimated % Total Hours
Completed Each Year per Cost Proposal
240.0
240.0
240.0
240.0
240.0
5%
per Cost Proposal per Cost Proposal
240

2. Calculate hourly rate for all years (Increase the Average Hourly Rate for a year by proposed escalation %) Proposed Escalation
5%
5%
5%
5%

ACTUAL COST-PLUS-FIXED FEE OR LUMP SUM (FIRM FIXED PRICE) CONTRACTS (CALCULATIONS FOR ANTICIPATED SALARY INCREASES)
NV5, Inc.

Direct Labor Subtotal Total Hours
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 2 of 3
Local Assistance Procedures Manual Exhibit 10-H
Cost Proposal
Certification of Direct Costs:

I, the undersigned, certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that all direct costs identified on the cost proposal(s) in this contract are actual, reasonable, allowable, and allocable to the contract in accordance with the contract terms and the following requirements:

1. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)

2. Terms and conditions of the contract

3. Title 23 United States Code Section 112 - Letting of Contracts

4. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 31 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures

5. 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 - Procurement, Management, and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Service

6. 48 Code of Federal Regulations Part 9904 - Cost Accounting Standards Board (when applicable) Prime Consultant or Subconsultant Certifying:

Name: Lori Goodwin Title *: Vice President
Signature : Date of Certification (mm/dd/yyyy): 11/12/2024 Email: [email protected] Phone Number: 559-661-5228
Address: 2109 West Bullard Avenue, Suite 145, Fresno, CA 93711 * An individual executive or financial officer of the consultant’s or subconsultant’s organization at a level no lower than a Vice President or a Chief Financial Officer, or equivalent, who has authority to represent the financial information utilized to establish the cost proposal for the contract.

List services the consultant is providing under the proposed contract:

Construction Management Services
EXHIBIT 10-H1 COST PROPOSAL Page 3 of 3
All costs must be applied consistently and fairly to all contracts. All documentation of compliance must be retained in the project files and be in compliance with applicable federal and state requirements.

Costs that are noncom pliant with the federal and state requirements are not eligible for reimbursement.

Local governments are responsible for applying only cognizant agency approved or Caltrans accepted Indirect Cost Rate{s).

LPP 15-01

Page 3 of 3 ends

January 2018

KRAMER WALKER, PE | Resident Engineer
Kramer Walker brings twelve years of experience on transportation improvements in the Central Valley working as a Project Manager, Resident Engineer, Assistant Resident Engineer and Office Engineer. He has worked on the construction of major expressway, highway, interchange, bridge, and utility projects. Kramer has indepth knowledge of the Caltrans Standard Plans, Specifications, and Construction Manual procedures.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE
ROADS PROGRAM PROJECTS 23-031 BP2 & 23-033

CITY OF TURLOCK
Resident Engineer for the $3.5 million and $2.9 million roadway rehabilitation projects. Project 23-031 BP2 includes the reconstruction of concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway, and curb ramp improvements, cold-planing of existing roadway surface, full depth reclamation (FDR-C) of the existing roadway structural section, and HMA pavement placement.

Project 23-033 includes the reconstruction of concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveway, and curb ramp improvements, removal of the existing roadway structural section, and full depth HMA pavement reconstruction. Prior to construction, responsibilities included a thorough constructability review of the project plans and specifications. During construction, responsible for full Resident Engineer duties.

MANNING AVENUE PHASE 3 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION

CITY OF REEDLEY
Resident Engineer for the $3.1 million sewer line replacement and roadway rehabilitation project. The project includes the rehabilitation of approximately 2,700 linear feet of roadway on Manning Avenue utilizing numerous different methods, including full depth section removal and replacement, 6-inch isolated dig-out areas, and variable depth grind followed by pavement fabric placement and an HMA overlay. Manning Avenue is a four-lane divided major arterial street that is a heavily traveled route for vehicles, public transportation, bicyclists, and pedestrian paths serving numerous businesses, residences, schools, and public offices through the center of Reedley. Prior to construction, responsibilities included developing a traffic management plan and performing a thorough constructability review of the project plans and specifications. During construction, responsible for full Resident Engineer duties.

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California
State University, Fresno

EXPERIENCE
12 years

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer
(CA), #C84284

JOHN SEYMOUR, PE | Assistant Resident Engineer
John Seymour brings seven years of experience on City and County improvement projects in the Central Valley working as a Senior Engineering Associate for Merced County and the City Engineer for the City of Atwater. He has worked on a variety of capital improvement projects, including roadway reconstruction, traffic signalization, and water storage tank projects. These projects had numerous different local, state, and federal funding requirements, and were constructed to City, County, and Caltrans Standards.

PROJECT EXPERIENCE

CITY ENGINEER

CITY OF ATWATER
07/20123 -11/2024
As City Engineer for the City of Atwater, duties included project management of the City’s Public Improvement Projects. This included developing capital improvement projects from PS&E through construction. Typical projects included utility relocations, roadway reconstruction and widenings, concrete improvements, and traffic signalization.

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE

MERCED COUNTY
01/2018-06/2023
As an Engineering Associate and a Senior Engineering Associate for Merced County Department of Public Works, responsibilities included project management on various public works projects including roadway reconstruction, sidewalk in-fill, underground storage tank removal and remediation, and traffic signalization. Typical duties included engineering design and plan set review, engineering estimates, construction inspection and construction management, and ensuring conformance with Caltrans LAPM requirements on Federal Projects.

EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, University of
California Davis

EXPERIENCE
7 years

REGISTRATIONS
Registered Professional Engineer
(CA), #C92033
City Council Staff Report
December 10, 2024
From: Jason Hedden, Police Chief
Prepared by: Amanda Fortado, Support Operations Manager Agendized by: Reagan M. Wilson, City Manager

1. ACTION RECOMMENDED:

Approving the purchase of three (3) replacement marked police BMW Motorcycles from Long Beach BMW Motorcycles, for a total amount not to exceed $109,000 from account number 506-00-000-213.51020 "Police Equipment" through BMW Long Beach utilizing cooperative Contract No. B22153311006

2. DISCUSSION OF ISSUE:

The Turlock Police Department replaces vehicles and equipment when they reach the end of their service life or if maintenance costs exceed the value of the vehicle or piece of equipment. In FY 2024-25, the three (3) traffic unit motorcycles are scheduled to be replaced and funds have been appropriated. These replacements comply with the established Turlock Police Department’s Equipment Replacement Plan.

The Turlock Police Department Field Operations Division utilizes a fleet of marked black and white emergency-equipped police motorcycles. These motorcycles are given a five (5) year life cycle and were purchased in 2019. Along with the three (3) in-service motorcycles, the Department also keeps a spare in the fleet. The following are currently active in the fleet:

1. Police BMW motorcycle POL19-1340 is five (5) years old and has approximately 21,300 miles.

2. Police BMW motorcycle POL19-1338 is five (5) years old and has approximately 29,100 miles.

3. Police BMW motorcycle POL19-1339 is five (5) years old and has approximately 35,000 miles.

4. Police BMW motorcycle POL 14-1135 is ten (10) years old and has approximately 41,240 miles.

The three (3) currently assigned BMW motorcycles will be reassigned as spares and/or training motorcycles to provide the traffic unit with the ability to have additional motor units at events or on traffic details when needed. The 2014 Motorcycle #14-1135 is scheduled to surplus, as the repair costs have exceeded its effectiveness.

The purchase of three (3) 2024 BMW Motorcycles is being done through BMW Long Beach on a cooperative agreement.

The adopted budget for FY 2024-25 in account number 506-00-000-213.51020 “Police Equipment Replacement” includes $109,000 for three (3) police motorcycles.

Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024

3. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:

Pursuant to Turlock Municipal Code section 2-7-08(b)(5), bidding procedures are not required when engaged in joint, cooperative, or leveraged purchasing plans that have been solicited and awarded on a competitive basis.

4. FISCAL IMPACT / BUDGET AMENDMENT:

Funding is budgeted in 506-00-000-213.51020 as part of the Vehicle Replacement Plan.

5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Recommend approval.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:

Recommend approval.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

N/A

8. ALTERNATIVES:

Council could choose not to approve the replacement of these motorcycles. This is not recommended because the motorcycles are aging and funding is available to replace them.

9. ATTACHMENTS:

1. Motorcycle Replacement Purchase - Draft Resolution

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TURLOCK
IN THE MATTER OF APPROVING THE } RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX PURCHASE OF THREE (3) REPLACEMENT }
MARKED POLICE BMW MOTORCYCLES FROM}
LONG BEACH BMW MOTORCYCLES, FOR A }
TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $109,000 }
FROM ACCOUNT NUMBER }
506-00-000-213.51020 “POLICE EQUIPMENT” }
THROUGH BWM LONG BEACH UTLIZING }
COOPERATIVE CONTRACT NO. }
B22153311006 }
}
WHEREAS, the Turlock Police Department replaces vehicles and equipment when they reach the end of their service life or if maintenance costs exceed the value of the vehicle or piece of equipment; and
WHEREAS, these replacements were planned and funds have been appropriated in FY 2024-25 budget and comply with the established Turlock Police Department’s Equipment Replacement Plan; and
WHEREAS, the purchase is being made from Long Beach BMW through the City of Sacramento Contract No. B22153311006.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Turlock does hereby approve the purchase of three (3) replacement marked police BMW Motorcycles from Long Beach BMW Motorcycles, for a total amount not to exceed $109,000 from account number 506- 00-000-213.51020 “Police Equipment” through Long Beach utilizing cooperative Contract No.

B22163311006.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Turlock this 10th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

NOT PARTICIPATING:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:
___________________________
Julie Christel, City Clerk
City of Turlock, County of Stanislaus,
State of California
City Council Staff Report
December 10, 2024
From: Christopher Fisher, Municipal Services Director
Prepared by: Juan Gutierrez, Transit Analyst
Agendized by: Reagan M. Wilson, City Manager

1. ACTION RECOMMENDED:

Resolution 2024-XXX: Adopting a revision to the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) for the City of Turlock for Fiscal Year 2024-25 and certifying compliance with federal PTASP regulations

2. DISCUSSION OF ISSUE:

On July 19, 2018, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) Final Rule (49 CFR Part 673), which required certain operators of public transportation systems that received federal funds under FTA's Urbanized Area Formula Grants to develop safety plans that included the processes and procedures to implement Safety Management Systems (SMS). The Final Rule also required an annual update that must be certified by transit agencies annually. The City of Turlock fulfilled this requirement for Fiscal Year 2020-21 by submitting a revision to its PTASP.

City transit staff reviews the PTASP annually to determine if any changes are recommended. In addition to this review, federal PTASP requirements in 49 U.S.C. § 5329(d) mandate that agencies serving small urbanized areas (urbanized areas with fewer than 200,000 people) update their Agency Safety Plans annually with the cooperation of frontline employees. Agencies are required to identify two key positions by name and title:

Accountable Executive and Chief Safety Officer. These individuals are permitted to work through the City's existing organizational and reporting structure, but are required to have direct reporting capability to the City Manager for safety-related matters that are urgent or otherwise not being resolved in a timely manner through traditional channels. The City has identified Wayne York (Transit Manager) as the Accountable Executive and Juan Gutierrez (Transit Analyst) as the Chief Safety Officer.

During February 2024 City transit staff sought feedback from frontline employees on the draft PTASP revisions but did not receive any. However, City staff made several important updates to the PTASP, including reassigning the General Manager position, including the Risk Management Director in safety communication activities, incorporating a process to report and handle assaults on transit workers, and referencing Turlock Transit's best practices for minimizing exposure to infectious diseases. These proactive steps show the City's commitment to continuously improving transit safety and communication.

3. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:

1. Recipients of FTA Section 5307 funds are required to perform an annual review of its PTASP with the participation of frontline employees to remain in compliance with federal regulations.

Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024

2. A PTASP establishes safety performance targets and outlines a framework for improving safety culture, all with the goal of reducing hazards to passengers and staff members in the provision of transit services.

3. The proposed update better aligns roles and responsibilities with the individuals best suited for oversight and implementation of the PTASP; it incorporates safety policies and procedures that improve the safety of City employees and passengers; and to improve the safety of transit workers, it outlines the steps followed to report, track, and handle assaults on transit workers.

4. FISCAL IMPACT / BUDGET AMENDMENT:

There are no direct or indirect expenses associated with the adoption of the proposed PTASP revision.

5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Recommend approval.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:

Recommend approval.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

This action is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15378 (Project) of the CEQA guidelines. This action consists of “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment” and therefore is not considered a project.

8. ALTERNATIVES:

1. Reject the proposed revision of the PTASP for the City of Turlock. City staff does not recommend this approach as all recipients of federal operating assistance are required to perform an annual review and update the adopted PTASP as a condition of continuing to receive federal funds. Additionally, updates to the PTASP are intended to improve safety following implementation.

9. ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft Resolution

2. Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) for FY 24-25

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TURLOCK
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

WHEREAS, on July 19, 2018, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) published the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) Final Rule (49 CFR Part 673), which requires certain operators of public transportation systems that receive federal funds under FTA's Urbanized Area Formula Grants to develop safety plans that include the processes and procedures to implement Safety Management Systems (SMS); and WHEREAS, on December 8, 2020, the City of Turlock adopted its first PTASP and is committed to regular reviews of the PTASP in accordance with federal regulations; and WHEREAS, in accordance with PTASP regulations that require agencies to identify their Accountable Executive and Chief Safety Officer by name and title, the City has identified Wayne York (Transit Manager) as the Accountable Executive and Juan Gutierrez (Transit Analyst) as the Chief Safety Officer, along with direct reporting authority to the City Manager, if necessary, for reporting time-sensitive safety-related issues; and WHEREAS, the City continues to revise it’s PTASP as needed to adhere to evolving legislative changes or enhancements to operations and procedures; and WHEREAS, this action is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15378 (Project) of the CEQA guidelines because it consists of “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment” and therefore is not considered a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Turlock does hereby adopt a revision to the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) for the City of Turlock for Fiscal Year 2024-25 and certifies compliance with federal PTASP regulations.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Turlock this 10th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

NOT PARTICIPATING:

ABSENT: ATTEST:
__________________________
}
}
}
}
}
}
}

IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING A REVISION

TO THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

AGENCY SAFETY PLAN (PTASP) FOR THE

CITY OF TURLOCK FOR FISCAL YEAR
2024-25 AND CERTIFYING COMPLIANCE

WITH FEDERAL PTASP REGULATIONS
Resolution No. 2022-

Page 2 ends

Julie Christel, City Clerk,
City of Turlock, County of Stanislaus,
State of California
1 Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) for the City of Turlock (Turlock Transit)
Under 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 673, a transit agency is required to maintain documents that describe its Agency Safety Plan (ASP), including those related to implementation and results from processes and activities. Also, a transit operator may have existing documentation that describes processes, procedures, and other information required in Part 673.

1. Transit Agency Information
Transit Agency
Name City of Turlock (Turlock Transit)
Transit Agency
Address 1418 N. Golden State Blvd., Suite 1, Turlock, CA 95380 Name and Title of
Accountable
Executive
Wayne York, Transit Manager
Name of Chief
Safety Officer or
SMS Executive
Juan Gutierrez, Transit Analyst
Mode(s) of Service
Covered by This
Plan
Demand-Response
(Paratransit, OnDemand) and Motor
Bus (Fixed Route)
List All FTA Funding
Types (e.g., 5307,
5337, 5339)
5307, 5339
Mode(s) of Service
Provided by the
Transit Agency
(Directly operated or
contracted service)
Demand-Response (Paratransit, On-Demand) and
Motor Bus (Fixed Route)
Does the agency
provide transit
services on behalf
of another transit
agency or entity?
Yes No Description of
Arrangement(s) N/A
Name and Address
of Transit
Agency(ies) or
Entity(ies) for Which
Service Is Provided
N/A
2 2. Plan Development, Approval, and Updates
Name of Entity That
Drafted This Plan City of Turlock
Signature by the Signature of Accountable Executive Date of Signature Accountable
Executive 9/17/24
Name of Individual/Entity That
Approved This Plan Date of Approval
Turlock City Council 12/10/24
Relevant Documentation (Title and Location)
Approval by the
Board of Directors or
an Equivalent
Authority
City of Turlock Resolution No. (TBD); Office of the City Clerk Name of Individual/Entity That
Certified This Plan Date of Certification
Wayne York, Transit Manager 9/17/24
Relevant Documentation (Title and Location)
Certification of
Compliance
City of Turlock Resolution No. (TBD); Office of the City Clerk Version Number and Updates
Record the complete history of successive versions of this plan.

Version
Number
Section/Pages
Affected Reason for Change Date Issued
1 ALL Initial adoption 12/08/20
2 1, 2 Incorporating recommendations from
the PTASP Technical Assistance
Center, process updates, and a unit of
measure conversion request from
StanCOG
08/24/21
3 1, 2, 3, 4, Reassigned the Accountable Executive
and Chief Safety Officer positions.

Solicited and incorporated relevant
frontline transit worker input.

Updated signatures and dates.

Updated target transmittal dates.

Updated agency leadership positions.

Updated key staff positions.
10/25/22
3 4 3, 7, 15, 16 Reassigned the General Manager
position.

Incorporate language that explains
how the ASP will be reviewed and
updated annually.

Incorporate language that explains the
process for reporting, tracking and
handling assaults on transit workers.

Removed the role of the Director of
Human Resources and Training and
assigned role to the Risk Management
Director.

Reference Turlock Transit’s
“Strategies to Help Minimize Exposure
to Infectious Diseases and Other
Respiratory Hazards” document.
12/10/24
Annual Review and Update of the Agency Safety Plan
Describe the process and timeline for conducting an annual review and update of the ASP.

This plan will be jointly reviewed and updated by the Turlock Transit Safety Committee, comprised of the Chief Safety Officer, contracted transit management staff, and frontline employees, by July 1st of each year. The ASP, with any proposed revisions, will be sent to the Accountable Executive for review and approval, prior to sending to the Turlock City Council for approval.

The City of Turlock complied with the annual frontline employee feedback requirement for the Public Transportation Agency Safety Plan (PTASP) on February 8, 2024. Frontline employees were given the opportunity to provide input and recommendations on safety issues and improvements during the review period from February 1, 2024, to February 9, 2024.

However, no feedback was received from frontline employees during this designated review period.

3. Safety Performance Targets
Safety Performance Targets
Specify performance targets based on the safety performance measures established under the National Public Transportation Safety Plan.

Targets below are based on a review of safety performance data from the City of Turlock for the prior completed Fiscal Year (FY 2023-2024). In FY 2023-2024, MB total mileage was 331,495 and DR total mileage was 27,368.

Mode of
Transit Service
Fatalitie
s (Total)
Fatalitie
s (Rate)
Injuries
(Total)
Injuries
(Rate)
Safety
Events
(Total)
Safety
Events
(Rate)
System
Reliability
4 Motor Bus
(Fixed Route) 0 0 3

0.25 per
month 6

0.5 per
month

1.2 MF
per 100K
miles
DemandResponse
(Paratransit)
0 0 1

0.1 per
month 2

0.17 per
month

5.5 MF
per 100K
miles
Safety Performance Target Coordination
Describe the coordination with the State and Metropolitan Planning Organization(s) (MPO) in the selection of State and MPO safety performance targets.

The Transit Manager shall share the ASP, including safety performance targets, with the entities described below and shall consider any suggestions or feedback from those respective entities in future enhancements or revisions, to include immediate updates as needed.

Targets State Entity Name Date Targets Transmitted
Transmitted to
the State Caltrans 12/11/24
Metropolitan Planning Organization
Name Date Targets Transmitted Targets
Transmitted to
the
Metropolitan
Planning
Organization(s)
Stanislaus Council of Governments
(StanCOG) 12/11/24

4. Safety Management Policy
Safety Management Policy Statement
Use the written statement of safety management policy, including safety objectives.

The management of safety is one of our core business functions. The City of Turlock is committed to developing, implementing, maintaining, and constantly improving processes to ensure that all our transit service delivery activities take place under a balanced allocation of organizational resources, aimed at achieving the highest level of safety performance and meeting established standards. All levels of management and all employees are accountable for the delivery of this highest level of safety performance.

Turlock Transit’s commitment is to:

1. Support the management of safety through the provision of appropriate resources, that will result in an organizational culture that fosters safe practices, encourages effective employee safety reporting and communication, and actively manages safety with the same attention to results as the attention to the results of the other management systems of the organization;

2. Integrate the management of safety among the primary responsibilities of all managers and employees;
5 3. Clearly define for all staff, managers and employees alike, their accountabilities and responsibilities for the delivery of the organization’s safety performance and the performance of our safety management system;

4. Establish and operate hazard identification and analysis, and safety risk evaluation activities, including an employee safety reporting program as a fundamental source for safety concerns and hazard identification, in order to eliminate or mitigate the safety risks of the consequences of hazards resulting from our operations or activities to a point which is consistent with our acceptable level of safety performance;

5. Ensure that no action will be taken against any employee who discloses a safety concern through the employee safety reporting program, unless disclosure indicates, beyond any reasonable doubt, an illegal act, gross negligence, or a deliberate or willful disregard of regulations or procedures;

6. Comply with, and wherever possible exceed, legislative and regulatory requirements;

7. Ensure that sufficient skilled and trained human resources are available to implement safety management processes;

8. Ensure that all staff are provided with adequate and appropriate safety-related information and training, are competent in safety management matters, and are allocated only tasks commensurate with their skills;

9. Establish and measure our safety performance against realistic and data-driven safety performance indicators and safety performance targets;

10.Continually improve our safety performance through management processes that ensure that appropriate safety management action is taken and is effective; and

11.Ensure externally supplied systems and services to support our operations are delivered meeting our safety performance standards.

Safety Management Policy Communication
Describe how the safety management policy is communicated throughout the agency.

Include dates where applicable.

All matters related to occupational safety, health, or security are communicated to all employees at the time of hire through written documentation and in-person training by Storer.

Remedial training on the same topics are provided to employees multiple times per year at mandatory employee training sessions held by Storer. Printed materials on the same topics, including this ASP, are made available 24/7 through postings by Storer in the work areas. Items of urgency or particular emphasis are communicated in writing and provided by Storer to each employee directly by their supervisor or her designee. Health or safety related items from the City are communicated in writing to the Storer General Manager for dissemination to their staff.

In addition, City and Storer personnel provide safety updates to Storer employees during monthly safety meetings.

Authorities, Accountabilities, and Responsibilities
Describe the role of the following individuals for the development and management of the transit agency’s Safety Management System (SMS).

Accountable
Executive
Wayne York, Transit Manager
The AE has ultimate authority over SMS development and
implementation, is accountable for agency safety performance, is responsible for the City to carry out the ASP, and promotes safety. 6 • Authority: The AE has ultimate control and direction over PTASP and TAM Plans.
• Accountability: The AE must ensure that agency SMS is effectively implemented throughout the agency’s public transportation system.

To ensure that action is taken as necessary to address substandard performance in the agency’s SMS. The AE may delegate specific responsibilities but is ultimately accountable.
• Responsibility: The AE is responsible to carry out the PTASP of the agency as well as the TAM Plan including control and direction over human and capital resources needed to develop and maintain the PTASP and the TAM Plan.

Chief Safety Officer
or SMS Executive
Juan Gutierrez, Transit Analyst
The Chief Safety Officer (CSO) reports SMS activities to AE, Director, and/or City Manager when required, Implements and operationalizes agency SMS, manages SMS documentation, oversee processes are in place, monitors Safety Risk mitigations, develops performance reports. • Authority: The SMS Executive/ CSO have authority over the day to day implementation and operation of the agency’s SMS. The SMS Executive and CSO are partners with the agency leaders and staff to execute the agency SMS.
• Accountability: The SMS Executive/ CSO are accountable to report to the AE and communicate AE decisions and directives as well as briefing the AE and Council Members.
• Responsibility: The SMS Executive/ CSO are responsible to implement and operate the agency SMS processes and activities including:
o Develop and maintain SMS documentation
o Directing hazard identification and risk assessment
o Monitor safety risk mitigation activities
o Planning safety management training
o Ensure that Safety Suggestion forms are reviewed and
addressed promptly
Agency Leadership
and Executive
Management
Reagan Wilson, City Manager
Sarah Eddy, Deputy City Manager
Christopher Fisher, Municipal Services Director
Wayne York, Transit Manager
Juan Gutierrez, Transit Analyst
Provides input, guidance and support to develop the ASP and implement SMS processes, review and act on safety performance reports to mitigate risks in areas of responsibility.
• Authority: To direct subordinate staff and ensure SMS compliance • Accountability: To ensure that SMS activities are being carried out and followed in each of their respective areas of operation 7 • Responsibility: To support the day to day operation and implementation of the agency SMS
Key Staff
Wayne York, Transit Manager
Juan Gutierrez, Transit Analyst
Bobbi Wayman, General Manager, Storer Transit Systems
Maritza Tinoco, Operations Manager, Storer Transit Systems Steven Rocha, Safety Officer, Storer Transit Systems
Draft safety management system policy and procedures, are Subject Matter Experts in development of real-world SMS strategies and processes, Execute SMS activities and promote best practices. • Authority: The key staff have the authority as assigned by the leadership and management to assist in the development of agency SMS processes and activities as they are the subject matter experts • Accountability: The key staff assigned are accountable to endorse the agency SMS and promote it at all levels
• Responsibility: Key staff members are responsible to draft the agency SMS policies and procedures. In addition to develop, implement and operate the agency safety plan action elements
Employee Safety Reporting Program
Describe the process and protections for employees to report safety conditions to senior management. Describe employee behaviors that may result in disciplinary action (and therefore, are excluded from protection).

Employees are expected to report all safety concerns to their supervisor. This notification can be made verbally or in writing, at the employee’s discretion, and should be made as soon as practically possible. Employees providing written reports are encouraged to do so on designated forms, though alternate forms will be accepted if the designated form(s) are unavailable. Employees opting to use the designated form(s) may elect to remain anonymous.

No employee will be retaliated against for reporting hazards or potential hazards or for making suggestions related to safety or security.

In accordance with the FTA’s 2023 mandate, Turlock Transit employees must report any assaults they experience. The FTA defines assault as an act that knowingly endangers the safety of an individual or shows reckless disregard for human life while interfering with, disabling, or incapacitating a transit worker. In the event of an assault, drivers and other transit workers are required to report immediately to their supervisor, either verbally or in writing. The information to be reported includes details about the assailant, the victim, the type of assault, date and time, location/vehicle number, and a description of the incident. The reports are reviewed by the Storer management team and formalized in an email to the Chief Safety Officer and the Accountable Executive. Incidents are to be reported to the Chief Safety Officer and the Accountable Executive, and discussed during monthly operations meetings to determine appropriate course of action.
8 Reports generated from Storer employees shall be reviewed and documented by the Storer General Manager, Operations Manager, and/or Safety Officer. Employees that fail to follow established safety procedures shall be subject to the following actions from their supervisor:

1. Supervisor informs employee of the violation;

2. Supervisor informs or reminds the employee of the correct procedure;

3. Supervisor directs the employee to comply and correct the violation, as applicable;

4. Supervisor reminds the employee of applicable disciplinary policies.

The previously described safety issues shall be reported by the Storer General Manager, or his/her designee, to the Chief Safety Officer. The Chief Safety Officer will log the reports received in the Safety Incident Log and will bring the reported hazards for discussion to the monthly Safety Committee meetings. It is at those meetings that the severity and likelihood of occurrence will be determined and mitigation strategies will be discussed. Urgent or timesensitive safety issues requiring an immediate response shall be communicated immediately, while less urgent issues shall be reported as soon as practically possible. All safety related issues for a given month shall be included in the monthly report from Storer and shall be discussed at the subsequent transit meeting between City staff and Storer staff.

Reports generated from City transit employees shall be reviewed and documented by the Chief Safety Officer. Employees that fail to follow established safety procedures shall be subject to the following actions from the Transit Manager:

1. Transit Manager informs employee of the violation;

2. Transit Manager informs or reminds the employee of the correct procedure;

3. Transit Manager directs the employee to comply and correct the violation, as applicable;

4. Transit Manager reminds the employee of applicable disciplinary policies.

Employees submitting frivolous or false reports of hazards or potential hazards will be subject to progressive discipline up to and including termination.

5. Safety Risk Management
Safety Risk Management Process
Describe the Safety Risk Management process, including:
• Safety Hazard Identification: The methods or processes to identify hazards and consequences of the hazards.
• Safety Risk Assessment: The methods or processes to assess the safety risks associated with identified safety hazards.
• Safety Risk Mitigation: The methods or processes to identify mitigations or strategies necessary as a result of safety risk assessment.

Turlock Transit uses the SRM process as a primary method to ensure the safety of our operations, passengers, employees, vehicles, and facilities. It is a process whereby hazards and their consequences are identified, assessed for potential safety risk, and resolved in a manner acceptable to Turlock Transit’s leadership. Turlock Transit’s SRM process allows us to carefully 9 examine what could cause harm and determine whether we have taken sufficient precautions to minimize the harm, or if further mitigations are necessary.

Turlock Transit’s Chief Safety Officer leads the agency’s SRM process, working with City transit administrative personnel and contracted operations and safety personnel to identify hazards and consequences, assess safety risk of potential consequences, and mitigate safety risk. The results of the agency’s SRM process are documented.

Turlock Transit’s SRM process applies to all elements of our system including our operations and maintenance; facilities and vehicles; and personnel recruitment, training, and supervision.

In carrying out the SRM process, Turlock Transit uses the following terms:
• Event – Any accident, incident, or occurrence.
• Hazard – Any real or potential condition that can cause injury, illness, or death; damage to or loss of the facilities, equipment, rolling stock, or infrastructure belonging to the City; or damage to the environment.
• Risk – Composite of predicted severity and likelihood of the potential effect of a hazard. • Risk Mitigation – Method(s) to eliminate or reduce the effects of hazards. • Consequence – An effect of a hazard involving injury, illness, death, or damage to City property or the environment.

Safety Hazard Identification
The Agency will apply risks of loss to the Risk Management Process which includes a systematic and continuous identification of loss exposures, the analysis of these exposures in terms of frequency and severity probabilities, the application of sound risk control procedures and the financing of risk consistent with the Agency’s financial resources. The Safety Risk Management practices include a comprehensive hazard identification and analysis data collection process from various sources such as: the employee safety reporting program, observations of operations, inspections, internal safety investigations, accident reports, compliance programs, safety committee reviews, industry data, governmental sources (FTA, NTSB, CHP), customer and public feedback or complaints.

The Chief Safety Officer may conduct further analyses of hazards and consequences entered into the Safety Risk Register to collect information and identify additional consequences and to inform which hazards should be prioritized for safety risk assessment. In following up on identified hazards, the Chief Safety Officer may:
• Reach out to the reporting party, if available, to gather all known information about the reported hazard;
• Conduct a walkthrough of the affected area, assessing the possible hazardous condition, generating visual documentation (photographs and/or video), and taking any measurements deemed necessary;
• Conduct interviews with employees in the area to gather potentially relevant information on the reported hazard;
• Review any documentation associated with the hazard (records, reports, procedures, inspections, technical documents, etc.);
• Contact other departments that may have association with or technical knowledge relevant to the reported hazard;
10 • Review any past reported hazards of a similar nature; and • Evaluate tasks and/or processes associated with the reported hazard.

The Chief Safety Officer will then prepare an agenda to discuss identified hazards and consequences with the Transit Management Team during monthly meetings. This agenda may include additional background on the hazards and consequences, such as the results of trend analyses, vehicle camera footage, vendor documentation, reports and observations, or information supplied by FTA or other oversight authorities.

Any identified hazard that poses a real and immediate threat to life, property, or the environment must immediately be brought to the attention of the Accountable Executive and addressed through the SRM process for safety risk assessment and mitigation. This means that the Chief Safety Officer believes immediate intervention is necessary to preserve life, prevent major property destruction, or avoid harm to the environment.

Safety Risk Assessment
Turlock Transit assesses safety risk associated with identified safety hazards using its safety risk assessment process. This includes an assessment of the likelihood and severity of the consequences of hazards, including existing mitigations, and prioritizing hazards based on safety risk.

The Chief Safety Officer or the designated safety officer employed by the operations contractor shall assess prioritized hazards using Turlock Transit’s Safety Risk Matrix. This matrix expresses assessed risk as a combination of one severity category and one likelihood level, also referred to as a hazard rating. For example, a risk may be assessed as “1A” or the combination of a Catastrophic (1) severity category and a Frequent (A) probability level.

This matrix also categorizes combined risks into levels, High, Medium, or Low, based on the likelihood of occurrence and severity of the outcome. For purposes of accepting risk:
• “High” hazard ratings will be considered unacceptable and require action from Turlock Transit to mitigate the safety risk,
• “Medium” hazard ratings will be considered undesirable and require the Transit Management Team to decide regarding their acceptability, and • “Low” hazard ratings may be accepted by the Chief Safety Officer without additional review.

Using a categorization of High, Medium, or Low allows for hazards to be prioritized for mitigation based on their associated safety risk.

The Chief Safety Officer schedules safety risk assessment activities on the transit management meeting agenda and prepares a Safety Risk Assessment Package. This package is distributed at least one week in advance of the monthly meeting. During the meeting, the Chief Safety Officer reviews the hazard and its consequence(s) and reviews available information distributed in the Safety Risk Assessment Package on severity and likelihood. The Chief Safety Officer may request support from other transit professionals in obtaining additional information to support the safety risk assessment.

Once sufficient information has been obtained, the Chief Safety Officer will facilitate completion of relevant sections of the Safety Risk Register, using the agency’s Safety Risk Assessment 11 Matrix, with the transit management group. The Chief Safety Officer will document the Transit Management Team’s safety risk assessment, including hazard rating and mitigation options for each assessed safety hazard in the Safety Risk Register. The Chief Safety Officer will maintain on file Transit Management Team agendas, Safety Risk Assessment Packages, additional information collection, and completed Safety Risk Register sections for a period of three years from the date of generation.

To determine the appropriate probability level as defined in Table II for a given hazard at a given point in time, assess the likelihood of occurrence of a mishap. Probability level F is used to document cases where the hazard is no longer present. No amount of doctrine, training, warning, caution, or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) can move a mishap probability to level F.
12 Safety Risk Mitigation
Risk Management is dedicated to the minimization of the total long-term cost to the Agency of all activities related to the identification, prevention and control of accidental losses and their consequences. Risk Mitigation Safety Actions fall into three major categories.

Physical Defenses: Objects and technologies that are engineered to discourage, warn against, or prevent inappropriate action or mitigate the consequence of events such as safety restraining systems, signals, safety redundancies, equipment crashworthiness.

Administrative Defenses: procedures and practices that mitigate the likelihood of accidents/incidents such as safety regulations, standard operating procedures, personnel proficiency, supervision, inspections and training.

Behavioral Defenses: behavioral interventions through education and public awareness campaigns aimed at reducing risky and reckless behavior of motorists, passengers and pedestrians; factors outside the control of the agency.

The Accountable Executive and Chief Safety Officer will review current methods of safety risk mitigation and establish methods or procedures to mitigate or eliminate safety risk associated with specific hazards based on recommendations from the Transit Management Team. Turlock Transit can reduce safety risk by reducing the likelihood and/or severity of potential consequences of hazards. Prioritization of safety risk mitigations is based on the results of safety risk assessments. The Chief Safety Officer tracks and updates safety risk mitigation information in the Safety Risk Register and makes the Register available to the Transit Management Team during monthly meetings and to agency staff upon request. 13 In the Safety Risk Register, the Chief Safety Officer will also document any specific measures or activities, such as reviews, observations, or audits, that will be conducted to monitor the effectiveness of mitigations once implemented.

6. Safety Assurance
Safety Performance Monitoring and Measurement
Describe activities to monitor the system for compliance with procedures for operations and maintenance.

Turlock Transit has many processes in place to monitor its entire transit system for compliance with operations and maintenance procedures, including:
• Safety audits,
• Informal inspections,
• Regular review of onboard camera footage to assess drivers and specific incidents, • Safety surveys,
• ESRP,
• Investigation of safety occurrences,
• Safety review prior to the launch or modification of any facet of service, • Daily data gathering and monitoring of data related to the delivery of service, and • Regular vehicle inspections and preventative maintenance.

Results from the above processes are compared against recent performance trends quarterly and annually by the Chief Safety Officer to determine where action needs to be taken. The Chief Safety Officer enters any identified non-compliant or ineffective activities, including mitigations, back into the SRM process for reevaluation by the Transit Management Team.

Describe activities to monitor operations to identify any safety risk mitigations that may be ineffective, inappropriate, or were not implemented as intended.

Turlock Transit monitors safety risk mitigations to determine if they have been implemented and are effective, appropriate, and working as intended. The Chief Safety Officer maintains a list of safety risk mitigations in the Safety Risk Register. The mechanism for monitoring safety risk mitigations varies depending on the mitigation.

The Chief Safety Officer establishes one or more mechanisms for monitoring safety risk mitigations as part of the mitigation implementation process and assigns monitoring activities to the appropriate director, manager, or supervisor. These monitoring mechanisms may include tracking a specific metric on daily, weekly, or monthly logs or reports; conducting job performance observations; or other activities. The Chief Safety Officer will endeavor to make use of existing Turlock Transit processes and activities before assigning new information collection activities.

Turlock Transit’s Chief Safety Officer and Transit Management Team review the performance of individual safety risk mitigations during monthly Transit Management Team meetings, based on the reporting schedule determined for each mitigation, and determine if a specific safety risk mitigation is not implemented or performing as intended. If the mitigation is not implemented or performing as intended, the Transit Management Team will propose a course 14 of action to modify the mitigation or take other action to manage the safety risk. The Chief Safety Officer will approve or modify this proposed course of action and oversee its execution.

Turlock Transit’s Chief Safety Officer and Transit Management Team also monitor Turlock Transit’s operations on a large scale to identify mitigations that may be ineffective, inappropriate, or not implemented as intended by:
• Reviewing results from accident, incident, and occurrence investigations; • Monitoring employee safety reporting;
• Reviewing results of internal safety audits and inspections; and • Analyzing operational and safety data to identify emerging safety concerns.

The Chief Safety Officer works with the Transit Management Team and Accountable Executive to carry out and document all monitoring activities.

Describe activities to conduct investigations of safety events, including the identification of causal factors.

Turlock Transit maintains documented procedures for conducting safety investigations of events (accidents, incidents, and occurrences, as defined by FTA) to find causal and contributing factors and review the existing mitigations in place at the time of the event (see Turlock Transit Safety Event Investigation Procedures Manual for specific procedures for conducting safety investigations). These procedures also reflect all traffic safety reporting and investigation requirements established by California Department of Motor Vehicles.

The Chief Safety Officer maintains all documentation of Turlock Transit’s investigation policies, processes, forms, checklists, activities, and results. As detailed in Turlock Transit’s procedures, an investigation report is prepared and sent to the Transit Management Team for integration into their analysis of the event.

Turlock Transit’s Transit Management Team consists of six members that represent management, operations, and maintenance. The Chief Safety Officer chairs the board. Turlock Transit’s Transit Management Team, with support of the operations and management contractor:
• Ensures all accidents or safety incidents are reviewed; • Ensures a determination is made regarding each accident as to whether it was preventable or non-preventable;
• Determines if causal factor(s) indicate(s) that a safety hazard contributed to or was present during the event; and
• Determines whether an accident appears to involve underlying organizational causal factors beyond just individual employee behavior.

Describe activities to monitor information reported through internal safety reporting programs.

The Chief Safety Officer and Transit Management Team routinely review safety data captured in employee safety reports, safety meeting minutes, customer complaints, and other safety communication channels. When necessary, the Chief Safety Officer and Transit Management Team ensure that the concerns are investigated or analyzed through Turlock Transit’s SRM process.

The Chief Safety Officer and Transit Management Team also review internal and external reviews, including audits and assessments, with findings concerning Turlock Transit’s safety performance, compliance with operations and maintenance procedures, or the effectiveness of safety risk mitigations.
15 7. Safety Promotion
Competencies and Training
Describe the safety training program for all agency employees and contractors directly responsible for safety.

Turlock Transit’s comprehensive safety training program applies to all Turlock Transit employees directly responsible for safety, including:
• Bus vehicle operators,
• Dispatchers,
• Maintenance technicians,
• Managers and supervisors,
• Agency Leadership and Executive Management,
• Chief Safety Officer, and
• Accountable Executive.

Turlock Transit dedicates resources to conduct a comprehensive safety training program, as well as training on SMS roles and responsibilities. The scope of the safety training, including annual refresher training, is appropriate to each employee’s individual safety-related job responsibilities and their role in the SMS.

Basic training requirements for Turlock Transit employees, including frequencies and refresher training, are documented in Storer Transit System’s Employee Handbook.

Operations safety-related skill training includes the following:
• New-hire bus vehicle operator classroom and hands-on skill training, • Bus vehicle operator refresher training,
• Bus vehicle operator retraining (recertification or return to work), • Classroom and on-the-job training for dispatchers,
• Classroom and on-the-job training for operations supervisors and managers, and • Accident investigation training for operations supervisors and managers.

Vehicle maintenance safety-related skill training includes the following:
• Ongoing vehicle maintenance technician skill training, • Ongoing skill training for vehicle maintenance supervisors, • Accident investigation training for vehicle maintenance supervisors, • Ongoing hazardous material training for vehicle maintenance technicians and supervisors, and
• Training provided by vendors.
16 Safety Communication
Describe processes and activities to communicate safety and safety performance information throughout the organization.

Turlock Transit’s Chief Safety Officer and the Risk Management Director coordinate Turlock Transit’s safety communication activities for the SMS. Turlock Transit’s activities focus on the three categories of communication activity established in 49 CFR Part 673 (Part 673):
• Communicating safety and safety performance information throughout the agency:

Turlock Transit communicates information on safety and safety performance in its quarterly newsletter and during quarterly All-Staff Meetings. Turlock Transit also has a permanent agenda item in all monthly meetings dedicated to safety. Information typically conveyed during these meetings includes safety performance statistics, lessons learned from recent occurrences, upcoming events that may impact Turlock Transit’s service or safety performance, and updates regarding SMS implementation.

Turlock Transit also requests information from drivers during these meetings, which is recorded in meeting minutes. Finally, Storer Transit Systems posts safety bulletins and flyers on the bulletin boards located in all bus operator and maintenance technician break rooms, advertising safety messages and promoting awareness of safety issues. • Communicating information on hazards and safety risks relevant to employees' roles and responsibilities throughout the agency: As part of new-hire training, Storer Transit Systems distributes safety policies and procedures, included in the Storer Transit Systems Employee Handbook, to all employees. Storer Transit Systems provides training on these policies and procedures and discusses them during safety talks between supervisors and bus operators and vehicle technicians. For newly emerging issues or safety events at the agency, Turlock Transit’s Chief Safety Officer issues bulletins or messages to employees that are reinforced by supervisors in one-on-one or group discussions with employees.
• Informing employees of safety actions taken in response to reports submitted through the ESRP: Turlock Transit provides targeted communications to inform employees of safety actions taken in response to reports submitted through the ESRP, including handouts and flyers, safety talks, updates to bulletin boards, and one-on-one discussions between employees and supervisors.

Strategies to Help Minimize Exposure to Infectious Disease Mitigation Measures
Turlock Transit has implemented various mitigation measures to address the challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic, enhancing its preparedness for future infectious diseases and respiratory hazards. These measures encompass several areas, including transit revenue vehicles and the Transit Center, and also outline future considerations. The “Strategies to Help Minimize Exposure to Infectious Diseases and Other Respiratory Hazards” can be found in Appendix A below.
17 Additional Information
Supporting Documentation
Include or reference documentation used to implement and carry out the ASP that are not included elsewhere in this Plan.

Turlock Transit will maintain documentation related to the implementation of its SMS; the programs, policies, and procedures used to carry out this ASP; and the results from its SMS processes and activities for three years after creation. They will be available to the FTA or other Federal or oversight entity upon request.

Definitions of Special Terms Used in the ASP
Term Definition
TAM Plan Transit Asset Management Plan
List of Acronyms Used in the ASP
Acronym Word or Phrase
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CHP California Highway Patrol
DR Demand-Response Transportation Modes (Paratransit & On-Demand) FR Fixed Route Transportation Mode
FTA Federal Transit Administration
NTSB National Transportation Safety Board
SMS Safety Management System
StanCOG Stanislaus Council of Governments
Storer Storer Transit Systems of Modesto, CA (transit contractor) TDA California’s Transportation Development Act
18 Appendix A: Strategies to Help Minimize Exposure to Infectious Diseases and Other Respiratory Hazards
Turlock Transit has implemented several mitigation measures that are consistent with the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for minimizing exposure to infectious diseases and respiratory hazards to address the challenges posed by the Covid-19 pandemic, thereby improving its future preparedness for other infectious diseases and respiratory hazards. These measures include:

Mitigation measures in effect on transit revenue vehicles • Installation of driver barriers to limit exposure to contaminants. • Use of USSCE air purification units that filter cabin air, with annual filter replacement. • Provision of hand sanitizer and face masks to drivers. • Weekly washing and disinfection of buses.

Mitigation measures in effect at Transit Center (Suite 1 & Suite 2) • Installation of USSCE air purification units.
o Filters replaced every other year.
• Installation of thermometers for employees to monitor their temperature. • Provision of COVID-19 testing to employees.
• Provision of hand sanitizer to all employees.
• Daily cleaning and sanitizing of high traffic areas.

Future Considerations
In the event of future infectious disease outbreaks, Turlock Transit will utilize SMS strategies to determine the need for additional responses including but not limited to:
• Reducing or cancelling service.
• Increasing vehicle availability.
• Enforcing social distancing.
• Creating public awareness campaigns that help inform the public. • Providing additional personal protective equipment to employees. • Providing masks to transit users.
• Following guidance provided by health officials and City leadership. • Increase cleaning and disinfecting of transit vehicles. • Conduct risk assessment to identify vulnerabilities within the transit system. • Consider implementing emerging innovative design concepts that have been identified as effective in reducing the transmission of infectious diseases on transit vehicles. • Implement strategies to improve ventilation, such as opening windows, doors, and roof hatches to reduce the concentration of airborne contaminants inside the vehicles. • Consider providing training virtually.
• Consider meeting virtually.

City Council Staff Report
December 10, 2024
From: Christopher Fisher, Municipal Services Director
Prepared by: Janine Lee, Associate Engineer
Agendized by: Reagan M. Wilson, City Manager

1. ACTION RECOMMENDED:

Resolution: Approving Contract Change Order No. 1 with SoCal Pacific Construction, Copr. dba National Coating & Lining Company for City Project No. 23-027, “Secondary Clarifier No. 4 Recoating” in the amount of $55,936.00 bringing the contract total to $273,573.00 and appropriating $34,000.00 from Fund 410 "Sewer" unallocated reserves to Fund 410 account number 410-51-534.43363 "Coating Contract"

2. DISCUSSION OF ISSUE:

The RWQCF includes five secondary clarifiers. The secondary clarifiers are used to separate microorganisms so that just clear water remains. The clear water that flows out of the top of the clarifier is sent along for disinfection. Secondary Clarifier No. 4 was constructed approximately 30 years ago. The corrosive wastewater environment has resulted in corrosion of various metal surfaces associated with Secondary Clarifier No. 4.

The scope of City Project No. 23-027 "Secondary Clarifier No. 4 Recoating" includes:
• Remove by abrasive blasting the existing coating system on the interior metal work (rake arms, skimmer arms, bridge, etc)
• Spot repair and overcoat all exterior metal work (surfaces above immersion) • Apply new coating system to all clarifier interior metal work, above grade piping and valves within the clarifier, and all piping associated with the scum box • Apply new coating system on all exterior surfaces of the Return Activated Sludge (RAS) pump station above ground equipment
Staff was under the impression that the launder channel was made of fiberglass material; therefore, it was not included in the original scope of work. It was determined in the field during construction that the launder channel is in fact made of metal and will require abrasive blasting and a new coating system.

Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $55,936.00 includes the additional work by National Coating & Lining (NCL) to blast and coat the launder channel after the weir and baffle are removed by City staff. An additional 15 working days is also requested by the Contractor in order to perform the new work. This change order increases the total contract cost due to additional coating work on the launder channel. It is necessary to approve this change order item to correct the contract amount and ensure that all interior metal work is coated properly with a new coating system.

Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024
Project Summary:

Amount Approval Date
Original Contract $217,637.00 May 14, 2024
Change Order No. 1 $55,936.00
Adjusted Total Contract $273,573.00
In accordance with the change order policy established in Council Resolution No. 2023- 070, Chance Order No. 1 exceeds the available contingency amount and requires City Council approval. The contingency amount for change orders is $21,764 at the time of the award of bid. Change Order No. 1 exceeds the original contingency by $34,172.

3. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:

A. Contract Change Order 1 is necessary to compensate the contractor for additional, unforeseen work.

B. Resolution No. 2023-070 outlines the City’s process for change order approval. The City Engineer is authorized to approve change orders up to 50% of the approved contract change order contingency amount; the City Manager and City Engineer may jointly approve change orders up to 100% of the approved contract change order contingency amount; and all other change orders must be reviewed by the City Council.

4. FISCAL IMPACT / BUDGET AMENDMENT:

No General Fund money was used for this project.

The total estimated project costs are displayed below:

The project account number for expenses is 410-51-534.43363 “Coating Contract” which includes a budget amount of $265,000 in FY 24/25. As the new estimated project cost is $298,503, staff requests an appropriation of $34,000 to cover the estimated project expenses in FY 24/25, including the additional services outlined in this Contract Change Order.

5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024
Recommend approval.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:

Recommend approval. Recommend approval.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

This project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) as this project involves negligible or no expansion or use of the existing facilities, and specifically no additional automobile lanes will be created by project.

8. ALTERNATIVES:

A. Council could choose not to approve Contract Change Order No. 1. Staff does not recommend this alternative, as part of the scope of the change order includes improvements that were necessary to complete the project.

9. ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft Resolution

2. Contract Change Order No. 1

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TURLOCK
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

WHEREAS, City Project No. 23-027 "Secondary Clarifier No. 4 Recoating" will remove the existing coating system and apply a new coating system to Secondary Clarifier No. 4 interior metal work; and
WHEREAS, the contractor, National Coating & Lining Company, discovered in the field that the launder channel that was expected to be made of fiberglass material was in fact made of metal; and
WHEREAS, Contract Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $55,936.00 with an additional 15 working days, covers the additional work required to blast and coat the launder channel; and WHEREAS, the contingency amount for change orders is $21,764 and Change Order No. 1 exceeds the original contingency by $34,172; and
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2023-070 stipulates that contract change orders in excess of the Council-approved contingency amount may only be approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the new estimated total project cost is $298,773 which will require an appropriation of $34,000 in FY 24/25, including the additional services outlined in Contract Change Order No. 1; and
WHEREAS, this project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) as this project involves negligible or no expansion or use of the existing facilities, and specifically no additional automobile lanes will be created by project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Turlock does hereby approve Contract Change Order No. 1 with SoCal Pacific Construction, Copr. dba National Coating & Lining Company for City Project No. 23-027, “Secondary Clarifier No. 4 Recoating” in the amount of $55,936.00 bringing the contract total to $273,573.00 and appropriate $34,000.00 from Fund 410 "Sewer" unallocated reserves to Fund 410 account number 410-51-534.43363 "Coating Contract".
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}

IN THE MATTER OF APPROVING
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 WITH
SOCAL PACIFIC CONSTRUCTION, COPR.

DBA NATIONAL COATING & LINING
COMPANY FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 23-027,
“SECONDARY CLARIFIER NO. 4
RECOATING” IN THE AMOUNT OF
$55,936.00 BRINGING THE CONTRACT
TOTAL TO $273,573.00 AND
APPROPRIATING $34,000.00 FROM FUND
410 "SEWER" UNALLOCATED RESERVES
TO FUND 410 ACCOUNT NUMBER 410-51-
534.43363 "COATING CONTRACT"
Resolution No. 2024-

Page 2 ends

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Turlock this 10th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

NOT PARTICIPATING:

ABSENT:

ATTEST:
__________________________
Julie Christel, City Clerk,
City of Turlock, County of Stanislaus, State
of California

City Council Staff Report
December 10, 2024
From: Christopher Fisher, Municipal Services Director
Prepared by: David Barr, Fleet Services Manager
Agendized by: Reagan M. Wilson, City Manager

1. ACTION RECOMMENDED:

Resolution: Approving the purchase of a utility body and an onboard compressor system to be supplied and installed by Stiles Truck Body & Equipment, Inc. of Turlock, CA for $39,354.57 to be funded by Fund 426 "Transit" and finding that the best interests of the City require that the purchase be made without compliance with the formal bid procedure pursuant to Turlock Municipal Code 2-7-08(b)(6) which requires at least four (4) affirmative votes

2. DISCUSSION OF ISSUE:

On July 1, 2023, the Fleet Services Division ordered three Ford F-350 chassis cab trucks without any bodies or equipment installed. Two of these trucks were going to be assigned to the Water Quality Control (WQC) area and one was to be assigned to Fleet Services as a service truck to maintain the Turlock Transit buses. At the time of the order placement, the decision was made to order the trucks as chassis cabs with no bodies due to long lead times on the required bodies which were planned to be sourced at a later date. With staffing changes, new staff members were unaware of the order of incomplete vehicles.

After the arrival of the three units, an informal bid process was completed wherein staff solicited quotes from several vendors to provide utility bodies for the trucks assigned to WQC. Stiles Truck Body & Equipment, Inc. (Stiles) came in with the lowest, responsible and responsive bid for those two trucks. The vehicle assigned to Fleet Services as a service truck to maintain the Turlock Transit buses also requires an air compressor system installed to allow for use of our pneumatic tools and tire inflation; this pushed this quote over the $25,000 threshold for an informal quote. The need for a formal bid would push an award out until late spring of 2025. During this period of time, the truck asset that has already been purchased will not be functional, will depreciate, and the warranty term will diminish. On top of that, our current Fleet Service Vehicle, a 1992 van, has been placed out of service due to a number of safety concerns, forcing Fleet Services to work out of a retired patrol vehicle. Stiles was successful in the informal bid for the truck bodies on the first 2 trucks, and they have 5 utility beds in stock.

In order for this purchase to be authorized without compliance to the formal bid process according to Turlock Municipal Code 2-7-8(b)(6), City Council must adopt "a resolution by at least four (4) affirmative votes determining that the best interests of the City require that the purchase be made without compliance with the formal bid procedure." Staff recommend approval of this purchase and have Stiles install the onboard air compressor system onto the Fleet vehicle in addition to the utility body, for which they were already the successful low bidder, so this unit can be immediately beneficial to Fleet Services in the performance of service to the Turlock Transit bus service.

Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024

3. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:

A. On July 1, 2023, staff purchased three chassis cabs without the other necessary equipment, which were probably planned for purchase from a different vendor to expedite delivery time. There have been new staff in the Fleet Services division who were unaware of this plan until the chassis cabs arrived and were discovered in their incomplete condition.

B. While two of the three vehicles could be outfitted within the threshold for the informal bid procedure, the third requires more equipment, which trips the requirement for a formal bid procedure.

C. The lead time on a formal bid procedure being fully conducted, the vendor awarded at City Council, and the deliverables completed is late Spring 2025.

D. It is not in the City's best interest for the vehicle to sit on the lot until late Spring of 2025 because it would not be a functional asset during that time, it would depreciate, and the valuable warranty period would diminish.

E. Stiles Truck Body & Equipment, Inc. has proven to be a competitive bidder by producing the low bids for the equipment required for the other two vehicles.

F. Finding that the best interests of the City require that the purchase be made without compliance with the formal bid procedure pursuant to Turlock Municipal Code 2-7- 08(b)(6) requires at least four (4) affirmative votes.

4. FISCAL IMPACT / BUDGET AMENDMENT:

The approval of this purchase will not impact the General Fund.

The total cost of this purchase is $39,354.57, which will be expensed to Fund 426 "Transit" account number 426-40-415-241-002.51240 captured within City Project 23047 "Transit Service Vehicle Purchase".

Appropriate funds have been allocated during Fiscal Year 2024-25 budget process to cover this purchase.

5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Recommend approval.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:

Recommend approval.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

This action is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15378(b)(5) of the CEQA guidelines. This action consists of “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment” and therefore is not considered a project.

8. ALTERNATIVES:

A. The City could go out to formal bid for this complete package, however, during that time which is estimated to be six months or more, the $57,135.74 chassis cab truck Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024
will sit in the parking lot unable to be utilized, while the value of the vehicle continues to depreciate and the warranty period diminishes. During this time, Fleet staff will continue to use a retired patrol vehicle, which is not outfitted for proper work and does not allow staff to properly serve internal customers.

9. ATTACHMENTS:

1. Draft Resolution

2. Estimate 32208 from Stiles Truck Body Equipment Inc.

BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TURLOCK
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2023, staff purchased three chassis cabs without vehicle bodies to expedite shipment and new staff in the Fleet Services division were unaware of this plan until the chassis cabs arrived and were discovered in their incomplete condition; and
WHEREAS, while two of the three vehicles could be outfitted within the threshold for the informal bid procedure, the third requires more equipment, which trips the requirement for a formal bid procedure; and
WHEREAS, the lead time on a formal bid procedure being fully conducted, the vendor awarded at City Council, and the deliverables on the vehicle being completed is late Spring 2025; and
WHEREAS, it is not in the City's best interest for the vehicle to remain inoperable until late Spring of 2025 because it would not be a functional asset during that time, it would depreciate, and the valuable warranty period would diminish; and WHEREAS, Stiles Truck Body & Equipment, Inc. has proven to be a competitive bidder by producing the low bids for the equipment required for the other two vehicles; and
WHEREAS, finding that the best interests of the City require that the purchase be made without compliance with the formal bid procedure pursuant to Turlock Municipal Code 2-7-08(b)(6) requires at least four (4) affirmative votes; and WHEREAS, this action is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15378 (Project) of the CEQA guidelines because it consists of “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment” and therefore is not considered a project.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Turlock }
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}

IN THE MATTER OF APPROVING THE

PURCHASE OF A UTILITY BODY AND AN

ONBOARD COMPRESSOR SYSTEM TO BE

SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY STILES
TRUCK BODY & EQUIPMENT, INC. OF
TURLOCK, CA FOR $39,354.57 TO BE
FUNDED BY FUND 426 "TRANSIT" AND

FINDING THAT THE BEST INTERESTS OF

THE CITY REQUIRE THAT THE PURCHASE

BE MADE WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH

THE FORMAL BID PROCEDURE PURSUANT
TO TURLOCK MUNICIPAL CODE 2-7-
08(B)(6) WHICH REQUIRES AT LEAST FOUR
(4) AFFIRMATIVE VOTES
Resolution No. 2022-

Page 2 ends

does hereby approve the purchase of a utility body and an onboard compressor system to be supplied and installed by Stiles Truck Body & Equipment, Inc. of Turlock, CA for $39,354.57 to be funded by Fund 426 "Transit" and find that the best interests of the City require that the purchase be made without compliance with the formal bid procedure pursuant to Turlock Municipal Code 2-7-08(b)(6) which requires at least four (4) affirmative votes.

PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Turlock this 10th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

NOT PARTICIPATING:

ABSENT: ATTEST:
__________________________
Julie Christel, City Clerk,
City of Turlock, County of Stanislaus,
State of California
Estimate
Date
11/18/2024
Estimate #
32208
Name / Address
City of Turlock
Attn: David D. Barr
701 S. Walnut Rd.

Turlock CA 95380
Stiles Truck Body & Equipment, Inc.

Terms
Net 30 Days
Rep
SRS
Fax Number Phone Number
209-585-8203
Total
Subtotal
Sales Tax (8.625%)
Customer Signature __________________________________
Upon acceptance of bid, please sign one copy of this estimate and return to us for our records, along with any required deposits or signed purchase orders. This Contract is void 30 days from date, unless one copy is signed and returned to bidder.

Please Note: There are NO Returns on special order, non-stocked part. Special orders require a non-refundable deposit. A 25% restocking charge may apply on all other returns.

Sales Representative Signature ___________________________________ P.O. Box 507 Turlock CA 95381-0507
701 S Golden State Blvd. Turlock CA 95380
Phone: 209-667-2639 FAX: 209-667-2746
website: www.stilestruckbody.com
Description Quantity Unit Price Total
** Estimate valid until 12/31/24 **
** There is no deposit required **
#6108F40 Knapheide Service Body with built-in flip top opening compartments on both sides. 1 16,825.00 16,825.00T - 9' long x 78" wide x 41.5" high with 14.5" deep compartments and 49" wide cargo area. - NXG rivetless rotary stainless steel slam latches.
- Standard interior shelving package.
- Knapheide surface mounted LED light kit.
- Knapheide body installation kit, 2017+ Ford 60" C.A.
- Knapheide 78" straight galva grip rear bumper w/ Knap Liner black spray on coating. - Exterior of body painted WHITE.
- Interior of body to be light grey primer finish.
- Installation of body onto a 2024 Ford F-350 regular cab w/ 60" cab to axle SRW chassis.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS (included):
- Ford OEM provided backup camera to be installed at the rear of the truck and wired to the factory harness (only if the truck is factory equipped). - Class 5 trailer tow package installed at rear of truck w/ 2-1/2" receiver tube, 16,000 lbs. gross trailer weight rating & 7-Wire RV trailer light plug.
- 20192696 CTECH mechanics tool drawer unit, 28" long x 29.82" high x 12" deep w/ (3) 3" deep drawers, (2) 5" deep drawers & (1) 7" deep drawer, all rated for 225 lbs., telescopic top shelf and powder coated RED.

ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT (not included - additional cost):
- #77009660 Knapheide Power Door Lock Kit, installed & wired to the truck's electric locking circuit.
1 1,964.75 1,964.75T
- Cargo tie-downs, set of (6) installed in the cargo area. 1 660.00 660.00T - V400141 VMAC VR-70 under hood rotary screw air compressor system w/ 70 CFM maximum output, 175 PSI maximum pressure, air/oil separator tank, in-cab controller and complete installation onto a 2024 Ford F-350 2X4. Filter/Lube/Reg & 1/2" air hose reel installed into the right side rear vertical compartment with a roller fairlead exiting the body back panel. Supply all plumbing from the air compressor to the rear outlet.
1 16,780.00 16,780.00T

Page 1 ends

Estimate
Date
11/18/2024
Estimate #
32208
Name / Address
City of Turlock
Attn: David D. Barr
701 S. Walnut Rd.

Turlock CA 95380
Stiles Truck Body & Equipment, Inc.

Please Note: There are NO Returns on special order, non-stocked part. Special orders require a non-refundable deposit. A 25% restocking charge may apply on all other returns.

TRUCK IS EQUIPPED WITH DUAL ALTERNATORS IT REQUIRES CONVERSION TO A SINGLE ALTERNATOR AT THE TRUCK OWNERS EXPENSE.

TERMS: NET 30 DAYS
- Upon acceptance of bid, please sign one copy of this estimate and return to us for our records, along with a signed copy of your purchase order.
- 3.5% Service fee applies to all credit card payments.

Page 2 ends

$39,354.57
$36,229.75
$3,124.82
City Council Staff Report
December 10, 2024
From: Christopher Fisher, Municipal Services Director
Prepared by: Tania Hernandez, Staff Services Analyst
Agendized by: Reagan M. Wilson, City Manager

1. ACTION RECOMMENDED:

Motion: Accepting the Development Fee Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2019-2020, Fiscal Year 2020-2021, Fiscal Year 2021-2022, Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and a combined Development Fee Annual and Five-Year Report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 as required by State of California Government Code Sections 66006(b) and 66001(d)

2. DISCUSSION OF ISSUE:

Development impact fees are one-time charges on new development collected and used by jurisdictions to mitigate the cost of capital facilities and infrastructure required to serve new residential, commercial, and industrial growth. Impact fees are generally collected upon issuance of a building permit, although the City of Turlock allows the payment of certain fees to be deferred to close of escrow, certificate of occupancy, or payment over a set period of time with City Manager approval.

Fees are established under Assembly Bill 1600 legislation as codified by California Government Code § 66000 et. Seq. This code section sets forth the procedural requirements for establishing and collecting development impact fees. These procedures require that “a reasonable relationship, or nexus, must exist between a governmental exaction and the purpose of the condition.”
The Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code § 66000 et seq.) was enacted by the State of California in 1987 to establish requirements for development impact fee (DIF) programs. Section 66006(b) of the Mitigation Fee Act requires local agencies to submit an Annual Report each year detailing the status of their DIF programs.

For each established development impact fee fund, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year, report the following information and make it available to the public:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund.

2. The amount of the fee.

3. The beginning and ending balance of the fund.

4. The amount of fees collected and the interest earned.

5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with fees.

6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the local agency determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.

7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan from the fund, including the public Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024
improvement for which the transfer was made, and, in the case of a loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the interest rate which the fund will receive on the loan.

8. The amount of any refunds made or allocated from the fee fund.

Section 66001 (d) of the act requires local agencies to submit reports every five years to detail the status of their various development impact fee programs. The local agency is required to make four findings summarized below:

1. Identify the purpose of the fee.

2. Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee and the purpose for which it is charged.

3. Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of the remaining improvements.

4. Identify the approximate dates on which the funding referred to above is expected to be deposited into the development impact fee fund.

Staffing shortages and other circumstances limited the City’s ability to complete the reports within the required timeframe. In 2023, the City engaged Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) to prepare these documents for Fiscal Years 2019-2020, 2020-2021, and 2021- 2022 for several active City DIF programs. This year, City staff worked with Harris & Associates to complete the annual report for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and a combined annual and five-year report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. The information in these reports is presented to comply with the aforementioned requirements for the following eight City development impact fee programs:
• Westside Industrial Specific Plan (WISP) Fee Program
• Northwest Turlock Specific Plan (NWTSP) Fee Program
• Northeast Turlock Master Plan (NETMP) Fee Program
• East Tuolumne Master Plan (ETMP) Fee Program
• North Turlock Master Plan (NTMP) Fee Program
• Master Storm (Storm) Fee Program
• Sewer Trunk Capacity (Sewer) Fee Program
• Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Program
These reports were made available to the public no less than 15 days in advance of this meeting as required under Section 66006(b).

3. BASIS OF RECOMMENDATION:

A. California Government Code Section 66006(b) requires local agencies generate, review and make available to the public an Annual Report detailing the status of their DIF programs. Section 66001(d) of the Government Code requires that a fiveyear report of development fee activity be reviewed and accepted by the CIty Council.

Agenda Staff Report
12/10/2024

4. FISCAL IMPACT / BUDGET AMENDMENT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Recommend approval.

6. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS:

Recommend approval.

7. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION:

This action is not subject to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15378 (Project) of the CEQA guidelines, consisting of “organizational or administrative activities of governments that will not result in direct or indirect physical changes in the environment”.

8. ALTERNATIVES:

A. Council could postpone the motion to accept these reports; this approach is not recommended as State law requires these reports to be completed.

9. ATTACHMENTS:

1. Annual Report FY 2019-20

2. Annual Report FY 2020-21

3. Annual Report FY 2021-22

4. Annual Report FY 2022-23

5. Combined Annual & Five-Year Report FY 2023-24
Final Report
Turlock Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2019–20
Prepared for:

City of Turlock
Prepared by:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
August 2023
EPS #222113
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................. 1 Overview ........................................................................................... 1 Organization of the Report ................................................................... 2 Westside Industrial Specific Plan ..................................................... 3 Fee Program Overview ......................................................................... 3 Current Fee Schedule .......................................................................... 3 Fee Fund Activity ................................................................................ 3 Remaining Improvements .................................................................... 6 Northwest Triangle Specific Plan ..................................................... 9 Fee Program Overview ......................................................................... 9 Current Fee Schedule .......................................................................... 9 Fee Fund Activity ................................................................................ 9 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 12 Northeast Turlock Master Plan ....................................................... 15 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 15 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 15 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 15 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 18 North Turlock Master Plan ............................................................. 22 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 22 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 22 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 22 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 25 East Tuolumne Master Plan ........................................................... 28 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 28 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 28 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 28 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 32 Master Storm Fee Program ............................................................ 36 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 36 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 36 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 36 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 39 Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program ................................................ 44 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 44 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 44 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 44 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 47 Capital Facilities Fee Program ........................................................ 51 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 51 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 52 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 52 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 55 List of Tables
Table 1. WISP Development Impact Fees ................................................... 4 Table 2. WISP Fee Program Fund Summary ................................................ 5 Table 3. WISP Fee Program Remaining Costs .............................................. 7 Table 4. WISP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ........................................ 8 Table 5. NTWSP Development Impact Fees ............................................... 10 Table 6. NWTSP Fee Program Fund Summary ........................................... 11 Table 7. NWTSP Fee Program Remaining Costs ......................................... 13 Table 8. NWTSP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs .................................... 14 Table 9. NETMP Development Impact Fees ............................................... 16 Table 10. NETMP Fee Program Summary .................................................... 17 Table 11. NETMP Fee Program Remaining Costs .......................................... 19 Table 12. NETMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs .................................... 21 Table 13. NTMP Development Impact Fees ................................................. 23 Table 14. NTMP Fee Summary .................................................................. 24 Table 15. NTMP Fee Program Remaining Costs ............................................ 26 Table 16. NTMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ...................................... 27 Table 17. ETMP Development Impact Fees ................................................. 29 Table 18. ETMP Fee Program Fund Summary .............................................. 30 Table 19. ETMP Fee Program Remaining Credits .......................................... 31 Table 20. ETMP Fee Program Remaining Costs (2 pages) .............................. 33 Table 21. ETMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ...................................... 35 Table 22. Master Storm Development Impact Fees ...................................... 37 Table 23. Master Storm Fee Program Fund Summary ................................... 38 Table 24. Master Storm Fee Program Remaining Costs (3 pages) ................... 40 Table 25. Master Storm Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ........................... 43 Table 26. Sewer Trunk Capacity Development Impact Fees ........................... 45 Table 27. Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Fund Summary ....................... 46 Table 28. Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Remaining Costs (2 pages) ....... 48 Table 29. Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ................ 50 Table 30. CFF Program Development Impact Fees ....................................... 53 Table 31. CFF Program Fund Summary ...................................................... 54 Table 32. CFF Program Remaining Costs .................................................... 56 Table 33. CFF Project Costs Incurred Detail (2 pages) .................................. 57 Table 34. CFF Program Net Remaining Costs .............................................. 59 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 1
Introduction
Overview
The Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code 66000 et seq.) was enacted by the State of California in 1987 to establish requirements for development impact fee (DIF) programs. Section 66006(b) of the Mitigation Fee Act requires local agencies to submit an Annual Report each year detailing the status of their DIF programs.

For each established development impact fee fund, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year, report the following information and make it available to the public:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund.

2. The amount of the fee.

3. The beginning and ending balance of the fund.

4. The amount of fees collected and the interest earned.

7. A description of each interfund transfer or loan from the fund, including the public improvement for which the transfer was made, and, in the case of a loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid, and the interest rate which the fund will receive on the loan.

8. The amount of any refunds made or allocated from the fee fund.

Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2
The City of Turlock (City) engaged Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) to prepare this document, which serves as the Fiscal year 2019–20 Annual Report for several active City fee programs. Specifically, the information in this report is presented to comply with the aforementioned requirements for the following seven City development impact fee programs:
 Westside Industrial Specific Plan (WISP) Fee Program
 Northwest Turlock Specific Plan (NWTSP) Fee Program
 Northeast Turlock Master Plan (NETMP) Fee Program
 North Turlock Master Plan (NTMP) Fee Program
 East Tuolumne Master Plan (ETMP) Fee Program
 Master Storm (Storm) Fee Program
 Sewer Trunk Capacity (Sewer) Fee Program
 Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Program
The first five fee programs listed above are fee programs for specific plan or master plan areas, and the remaining three programs are citywide fee programs.

The information needed for the required reporting for each fee program was obtained from the City. For each fee program, the City provided the reports and data listed below:
 Most recent Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (or Update).  Fund balances, revenue, and expenses for fiscal year 2019–20.  Remaining improvements to be constructed and estimated construction costs.  Current fee schedule.

Organization of the Report
Following this introduction, each chapter of this report focuses on one fee program, providing the Mitigation Fee Act required annual reporting for Fiscal year 2019–20. The report is organized as follows:
 Chapter 1: Introduction
 Chapter 2: Westside Industrial Specific Pan Fee Program  Chapter 3: Northwest Triangle Specific Plan Fee Program  Chapter 4: Northeast Turlock Master Plan Fee Program
 Chapter 5: North Turlock Master Plan Fee Program
 Chapter 6: East Tuolumne Master Plan Fee Program
 Chapter 7: Master Storm Fee Program
 Chapter 8: Sewer Trunk Capacity Development Fee Program  Chapter 9: Capital Facilities Fee Program
Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 3
Westside Industrial Specific Plan
Fee Program Overview
The WISP Area includes land zoned for commercial, office, and industrial uses.

The WISP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the WISP Area.

The WISP fees originally funded transportation, storm drainage, recycled water, sanitary sewer, and potable water improvements needed to serve the WISP Area.

In 2013, a WISP Fee Nexus Study Update was prepared in which the transportation and storm drainage improvements were removed from the WISP Fee Program and added to the citywide fee programs for such facilities. The projects and any existing funds for these former WISP Fee Program components were moved to the citywide fee programs. In addition, the WISP Fee Program recycled water component was combined with the water component, and all projects and funding were moved from the recycled water component to the water component.

The components of the updated WISP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system infrastructure, including sewer lines and a pump station.
 Water: Funds water system infrastructure, including water lines and a water well.
 Administration: Funds administration of the WISP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 1 shows the current fee schedule for the WISP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 2 shows the WISP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2019–20. It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the three components. During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income and WISP Area development impact fees, and the following expenses were incurred:
 City Engineering Services.
 Administrative Reporting.

Table 1
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Business Park $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Community Commercial $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Highway Commercial $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Industrial $ 8,057.29 $ 5,018.75 $ 391.97 $ 13,468.01Office $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 4 Table 2
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Fee Program Fund Summary (FY 2019-2020)Item Sanitary Sewer Water Administration [1] Total Beginning Balance $ 322,306 $ 336,584 ($ 235,115) $ 423,775Revenue Interest Income $ 2,722 $ 2,843 $ 0 $ 5,565Development Fees $ 12,290 $ 21,744 $ 1,021 $ 35,055Total Revenue $ 15,012 $ 24,587 $ 1,021 $ 40,620 Expenses
City Engineering Services $ 0 $ 0 ($ 1,075) ($ 1,075)
Reporting $ 0 $ 0 ($ 1,240) ($ 1,240)Total $ 0 $ 0 ($ 2,315) ($ 2,315) Ending Balance $ 337,318 $ 361,171 ($ 236,409) $ 462,080 Source: City of Turlock
[1] The original fee program nexus study had more improvements than what the most recent update included. Staff projected to receive higher administration revenue because budget estimates were based on a percentage of theoriginal projects listed.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 5 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 6
Remaining Improvements
Table 3 details the remaining WISP Fee Program improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the WISP Fee Program fees. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2013 WISP Fee Nexus Study Update. Portions of both a sewer main and a water main have been completed since 2013, and the associated estimated costs have been deducted from the original improvement costs. These improvements were constructed by developers who received WISP fee credits to reimburse them for the construction. In addition, the 2013 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index (CCI) for San Francisco from September 2013 through March 2020.

In total, approximately $9.0 million in improvements remain to be constructed.

Table 4 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the existing fund balance. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all remaining improvements. For each fee component, additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $9.0 million in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining fee program costs, as summarized by component below:

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
WISP Fee Program revenue will provide the financing needed to fully fund the remaining improvements and fee administration costs summarized above. The timing and amount of the fee revenue will depend on the rate and amount of development. Fee revenue will be collected at the issuance of building permits for development in the WISP. The remaining improvements will be constructed as sufficient fee revenue becomes available. The improvements will be completed in an order to be established by the City.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sanitary Sewer $ 3,393,000
Water $ 5,071,000
Administration $ 523,000
Total $ 8,987,000
Table 3
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs
(2020 $) [1] Less Completed Remaining Costs
WISP-Funded Percentage of Costs 100%Sanitary Sewer
5 15' Gravity in Clinton from W. Main 2100' to north $ 412,692 $ 0 $ 412,692 13 10" Gravity in Washington from W. Main 1400' to south $ 211,637 $ 0 $ 211,637 19 12" Gravity in Washington from Linwood 2800' to north $ 465,601 $ 0 $ 465,601 20 12" Force Main in Washington from Linwood to W. Main $ 816,313 $ 0 $ 816,313 21 12' Gravity in future road from Linwood 2800' to north $ 465,601 $ 0 $ 465,60122 10" Gravity in Tegner from Linwood 732' to north $ 151,169 $ 0 $ 151,16923 10" Gravity in Kilroy from Linwood 1700' to north [2] $ 256,987 $ 0 $ 256,98724 15' Gravity in Linwood from Washington 2600' East $ 510,951 $ 0 $ 510,951 P5 Proposed Pump Station at Washington and Linwood $ 439,574 $ 0 $ 439,574 Subtotal $ 3,730,525 $ 0 $ 3,730,525
Water
8 12" Water Line in Canal from Washington 2600 east [3] $ 393,040 $ 393,040 $ 0 9 12" Water Line in Canal from Fransil to Diane $ 393,040 $ 0 $ 393,040 10 12" Water Line in Canal from Diane to Walnut $ 196,520 $ 0 $ 196,520 15 12" Water Line in Washington from W. Main to Ruble $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,15717 12" Water in Ruble from Washington to Tegner [4] $ 343,280 $ 0 $ 343,28019 12" Water Line in Washington from Ruble to Linwood $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,15721 12" Water in Tegner from Linwood 1300 feet north $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,157 22 12" Water in Kilroy from Linwood 1732' to North [5] $ 261,825 $ 0 $ 261,82523 12" Water in Linwood from Washington to Tegner $ 816,313 $ 0 $ 816,313 25 12" Water in Linwood from Tegner to Kilroy $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,15726 12" Water in Linwood from Kilroy to Walnut $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,157 W5 New Potable Well Near Linwood and Washington $ 1,380,373 $ 0 $ 1,380,373 Subtotal $ 5,825,176 $ 393,040 $ 5,432,136
Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 9,555,701 $ 393,040 $ 9,162,661 Administration - 3% of Costs [6] $ 286,671Total WISP Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 9,449,332Source: City of Turlock [4] Updated remaining costs as TID completed 2600' in 2004 from Tegner west to Washington. Remaining LF is 2800.[5] Updated the LF to 1732' (&remaining costs) per partial project completion as reported in the FY18/19 Annual Report.[1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-19 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, July 2020.
[3] Project complete. Hilmar Cheese installed 2652' in 2015-2016. COT & developer entered into reimbursement agreement.[2] Updated the LF to 1700' (&remaining costs) per partial project completion as reported in the FY18/19 Annual Report.[6] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 7 Table 4
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)Item Source Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Remaining Costs Table 3 $ 3,730,525 $ 5,432,136 $ 286,671 $ 9,449,332 Less Fund Balance Table 2 ($ 337,318) ($ 361,171) $ 236,409 ($ 462,080)Net Remaining Costs $ 3,393,207 $ 5,070,965 $ 523,080 $ 8,987,252Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements No No No NoPercent of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2020 $)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 8 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 9
Northwest Triangle Specific Plan
Fee Program Overview
The NWTSP Area includes land zoned for residential and commercial uses. The NWTSP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the NWTSP Area. The NWTSP fees originally funded transportation, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer improvements needed to serve the NWTSP Area. In 2013, a NWTSP Fee Nexus Study Update was prepared in which the transportation and storm drainage were removed from the NWTSP Fee Program and added to the citywide fee programs for such facilities. The projects and any existing funds for these former NWTSP Fee Program components were moved to the citywide fee programs. In addition, water improvements specific to the NWTSP were added to the NWTSP Fee Program.

The components of the updated NWTSP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system lines.
 Water: Funds water system lines.
 Administration: Funds administration of the NWTSP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 5 shows the current fee schedule for the NWTSP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 6 shows the NWTSP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2019–20.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the three components.

During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income and NWTSP Area development impact fees, and the following expenses were incurred:
 Bank charges.
 Administrative Reporting.

There were no loans and no refunds made or allocated from the NWTSP Fee Program.

Table 5
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Residential
Low Density $ 33.39 $ 1,483.70 $ 45.01 $ 1,562.10
Low-Medium Density $ 27.58 $ 927.68 $ 29.04 $ 984.30Medium Density $ 23.23 $ 673.62 $ 20.32 $ 717.17High Density $ 23.23 $ 974.13 $ 30.49 $ 1,027.85 Nonresidential
Community Commercial $ 107.43 $ 3,546.66 $ 110.33 $ 3,764.42 Highway Commercial $ 107.43 $ 3,546.66 $ 110.33 $ 3,764.42 Heavy Commercial $ 107.43 $ 3,546.66 $ 110.33 $ 3,764.42 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per dwelling unit
per developable acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 10 Table 6
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Fee Program Fund Summary (FY 2019-20)Item Sanitary Sewer Water Administration Total Beginning Balance $ 215,610 $ 175,247 $ 3,829 $ 394,686Revenue Interest Income $ 2,602 $ 2,235 $ 0 $ 4,837Development Fees $ 1,864 $ 80,239 $ 2,463 $ 84,566Total $ 4,466 $ 82,474 $ 2,463 $ 89,403 Expenses
Bank Charges ($ 75) $ 0 $ 0 ($ 75)Construction Project $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0City Enginerring Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Reporting $ 0 $ 0 ($ 1,240) ($ 1,240)Total ($ 75) $ 0 ($ 1,240) ($ 1,315) Ending Balance $ 220,001 $ 257,721 $ 5,052 $ 482,774Source: City of Turlock Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 11 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 12
Remaining Improvements
Table 7 details the remaining NWTSP Fee Program improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the NWTSP Fee Program fees. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2013 NWTSP Fee Nexus Study Update. A 12-inch water line was completed since 2013, as shown in the table. Another 12-inch water line and bore casing have been combined into one improvement, and a new cost estimate was provided for this item. In addition, the 2013 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI for San Francisco from September 2013 through March 2020.

Table 8 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the existing fund balance. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all remaining improvements. For each fee component, additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $752,000 in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining fee program costs, as summarized by component below:

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
Future NWTSP Fee Program revenue will provide the financing needed to fully fund the remaining improvements and fee administration costs summarized above. The timing and amount of the fee revenue will depend on the rate and amount of development. Fee revenue will be collected at the issuance of building permits for development in the NWTSP. The remaining improvements will be constructed as sufficient fee revenue becomes available. The improvements will be completed in an order to be established by the City.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sanitary Sewer $ 302,000
Water $ 419,000
Administration $ 31,000
Total $ 752,000
Table 7
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
NWTSP-Funded Percentage of Costs 100%Sanitary Sewer
1 10" Sewer Line in Golden State Blvd from Tuolumne 1800 feet North $ 272,104 $ 0 $ 272,104 2 12" Sewer Line in Golden State Blvd from Tuolumne 1800 feet South $ 249,429 $ 0 $ 249,429 Subtotal $ 521,533 $ 0 $ 521,533
Water
1 12" Water line in Golden State from Taylor 400' South $ 60,468 $ 0 $ 60,468 2 12" Water Line in Taylor Rd from Golden State to Tegner $ 211,637 $ 0 $ 211,6373 Bore 24" Casing under TID at Tegner $ 45,351 $ 0 $ 45,3514 12" Water Line in Tuolumne from Tegner to Countryside $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 5 Bore 24" Casing / Install 12" Line Under SR99 at Tuolumne $ 359,483 $ 0 $ 359,483 Subtotal $ 676,938 $ 0 $ 676,938
Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 1,198,471 $ 0 $ 1,198,471
Administration - 3% of Costs [2] $ 35,954Total NWTSP Area Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 1,234,425Source: City of Turlock [1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-19 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, July 2020. [2] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 13 Table 8
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)Item Source Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Remaining Costs Table 7 $ 521,533 $ 676,938 $ 35,954 $ 1,234,425Less Fund Balance Table 6 ($ 220,001) ($ 257,721) ($ 5,052) ($ 482,774)Net Remaining Costs $ 301,532 $ 419,217 $ 30,902 $ 751,651Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements No No No NoPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2020 $)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 14 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
Northeast Turlock Master Plan
Fee Program Overview
The developable land in the NETMP Area consists of residential uses only. The NETMP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the NETMP Area. The components of the NETMP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system infrastructure, including sewer line and lift station improvements. All sewer system infrastructure has been completed and funded.
 Storm Drainage: Funds storm drainage lines.
 Transportation: Funds street, traffic signal, and bike and pedestrian paths improvements.
 Water: Funds water infrastructure, including water lines and 50 percent of a non-potable purple water pipe. The remaining 50 percent is funded by a City contribution.
 Administration: Funds administration of the NETMP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 9 shows the current fee schedule for the NETMP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. It also shows the Adjusted NETMP fees of $3,000 per dwelling unit that were approved by the Turlock City Council in April of 2020.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 10 shows the NETMP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2019–20.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the five components.

Table 9
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Water Admin. Total Residential
Very Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00Medium Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Residential
Very Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00Medium Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
Fee per Dwelling Unit (effective April 1, 2020)
Adjusted Fee per Dwelling Unit to Be Implemented by Individual Developer Agreements (Approved by Turlock City Council - April 2020)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 16 Table 10
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Fee Program Summary (FY 2019-20)Item Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Water Administration Total Beginning Balance $ 189,257 $ 1,275,350 $ 1,416,425 $ 539,241 $ 80,928 $ 3,501,202Revenue Market Valuation $ 1,772 $ 11,934 $ 13,250 $ 5,045 $ 757 $ 32,758Interest Income $ 2,119 $ 14,283 $ 14,802 $ 6,037 $ 0 $ 37,241Development Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Total $ 3,891 $ 26,217 $ 28,052 $ 11,082 $ 757 $ 69,999 Less Expenses
Bank Charges $ 0 $ 0 ($ 594) $ 0 $ 0 ($ 594)Contractual Services City Engineering Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 7,062) ($ 7,062)Reporting $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 1,240) ($ 1,240)Special Legal Counsel $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 8,489) ($ 8,489)Fee Nexus Study $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Subtotal $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 16,791) ($ 16,791) Capital Outlay
Monte Vista Avenue - North Olive Avenue to Berkeley Avenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers Out
Transfers Out To Fd 215 MV & Colorado P0763 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers Out To Fd 502 Engineering Admin $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Subtotal $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Total Expenses $ 0 $ 0 ($ 594) $ 0 ($ 16,791) ($ 17,385) Ending Balance $ 193,148 $ 1,301,567 $ 1,443,883 $ 550,323 $ 64,894 $ 3,553,816 Source: City of Turlock
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 17 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 18
During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income and NETMP Area development impact fees, and the following expenses were incurred:
 Bank charges.
 City Engineering Services.
 Administrative Reporting.
 Special Legal Counsel.

There were no loans and no refunds made or allocated from the NETMP Fee Program.

Remaining Improvements
Table 11 details the remaining improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the NETMP Fee Program revenues. The costs are based on the remaining improvement costs detailed in the 2004 NETMP Fee Nexus Study. Because the majority of the improvements have now been completed (including all of the sewer improvements), in 2018, the City prepared an updated list of remaining improvements and also updated the remaining costs to reflect then current dollars. The 2018 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI for San Francisco from December 2018 through March 2020.

In addition to improvement costs, the costs in Table 11 include amounts owed from the Transportation fund component to the other fund components because of interfund transfers that were made. The interfund transfers owed were not updated to 2020 dollars, as the amounts will remain constant until paid back.

After accounting for the amounts owed to various fund components, two of the components (Water and Administration) have remaining costs that are less than zero.

Table 11
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
NETMP-Funded Percentage of Costs 100%
Sanitary Sewer
Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($57,138) $0 ($ 57,138) Storm Drainage
Line in 1st Road south of Christoffersen off Berkeley Road $ 130,863 $ 0 $ 130,863Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($ 109,537) $ 0 ($ 109,537) Subtotal $ 21,326 $ 0 $ 21,326
Transportation
Signal at Taylor Road/Berkeley Avenue $ 713,743 $ 0 $ 713,743Christoffersen Parkway - North Olive Avenue to Berkeley Avenue $ 48,775 $ 0 $ 48,775Christoffersen Parkway - North Olive Avenue to Berkeley Avenue (Sound Wall) $ 126,491 $ 0 $ 126,491Monte Vista Avenue - North Olive Avenue to Berkeley Avenue $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Colorado Avenue - North of Monte Vista Avenue to Project Line $ 76,224 $ 0 $ 76,224Berkeley Avenue Landscape Setback Area Value $ 24,760 $ 0 $ 24,760Interior Pedestrian Connection Paths $ 18,450 $ 0 $ 18,450Interfund Transfer (Owed to other fee components) $ 715,225 $ 0 $ 715,225Subtotal $ 1,723,668 $ 0 $ 1,723,668 Water
East/West Line in 2nd Rd South of Christoffersen Pkwy, Colorado to Greenbelt $ 183,353 $ 0 $ 183,353Purple Pipe $ 191,262 $ 0 $ 191,262City Contribution to Purple Pipe ($ 95,631) $ 0 ($ 95,631)Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($ 500,234) $ 0 ($ 500,234) Subtotal ($ 221,251) $ 0 ($ 221,251)
Administration
Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($ 48,315) $ 0 ($ 48,315) Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 1,418,290 $ 0 $ 1,418,290
Administration - 3% of Costs [2] $ 42,549Total NETMP Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 1,460,839Source: City of Turlock[1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-19 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, July 2020.
[6] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 19 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 20
Table 12 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the fee fund balances. All NETMP fee fund components except for the Transportation component have net remaining costs that are less than zero, indicating that, at this time, sufficient funds have been collected to fund remaining all improvements. In total, the NETMP fee fund currently has an estimated $2.1 million of surplus funds, as summarized by component below:

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
No remaining funding is necessary, as the City has collected enough NETMP fee revenue to fund the remaining infrastructure costs. In addition to the estimated $2.1 million in current surplus NETMP funds summarized above, future NETMP fees, if collected, would result in a greater surplus. As discussed previously, future NETMP fees have been reduced from approximately $37,000 to $52,000 per dwelling unit (depending on the unit type) to $3,000 per dwelling unit for all dwelling units, and therefore, the amount of potential additional surplus funds would be minimal. NETMP fees are collected at the issuance of building permits for development in the NETMP.

The remaining improvements are to be located on undeveloped land that is privately owned by individual developers. The developers will construct the improvements and be reimbursed through the NETMP Fee Program. The timing of construction will depend on the rate of the remaining future residential development and will be determined by the developers who will construct the improvements.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sanitary Sewer ($ 250,000)
Storm Drainage ($ 1,280,000)
Transportation $ 280,000
Water ($ 772,000)
Administration ($ 71,000)
Total ($ 2,093,000)
Table 12
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)Item Source Sanitary
Sewer
Storm
Drainage Transportation Water Admin. Total
Remaining Costs Table 11 ($ 57,138) $ 21,326 $ 1,723,668 ($ 221,251) ($ 5,766) $ 1,460,839 Less Fund Balance Table 10 ($ 193,148) ($ 1,301,567) ($ 1,443,883) ($ 550,323) ($ 64,894) ($ 3,553,816)Net Remaining Costs ($ 250,287) ($ 1,280,241) $ 279,785 ($ 771,574) ($ 70,660) ($ 2,092,977)Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements Yes Yes No Yes Yes YesPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2020 $)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 21 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 22
North Turlock Master Plan
Fee Program Overview
The developable land in the NTMP Area consists of residential, office, and public school uses. The NTMP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the NTMP Area. Most of the improvements have already been completed. The components of the NTMP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system infrastructure, including sewer line and lift station improvements.
 Storm Drainage: Funds storm drainage improvements, including storm line, lift station, and storm water storage improvements.
 Transportation: Funds street, traffic signal, and bike and pedestrian paths improvements.
 Administration: Funds administration of the NTMP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 13 shows the current fee schedule for the NTMP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 14 shows the NTMP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2019–20.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the four components.

During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income only. There is no remaining development in the NTMP, so there was no fee revenue. The following expenses were incurred:
 Bank charges.

There were no loans and no refunds made or allocated from the NTMP Fee Program.

Table 13
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Admin. Total Residential
Low Density $ 2,907.79 $ 3,751.42 $ 9,306.24 $ 478.96 $ 16,444.41 Medium Density $ 2,907.79 $ 2,362.61 $ 9,306.24 $ 437.29 $ 15,013.93High Density $ 2,907.79 $ 1,763.15 $ 9,306.24 $ 419.32 $ 14,396.50 Nonresidential
Elementary School $ 8,315.64 $ 2,722.07 $ 52,297.82 $ 1,900.09 $ 65,235.62Office $ 16,575.12 $ 38,704.79 $ 196,349.04 $ 7,548.87 $ 259,177.82 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per dwelling unit
per acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 23 Table 14
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Fee Summary (FY 2019-20)Item Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Administration [1] TotalBeginning Balance $ 842,674 $ 454,063 $ 891,966 ($ 5,047) $ 2,183,656Revenue Interest Income $ 8,952 $ 4,863 $ 9,390 $ 0 $ 23,206Market Valuation $ 0 $ 20,457 $ 0 $ 0 $ 20,457Total $ 8,952 $ 25,320 $ 9,390 $ 0 $ 43,663 Expenses
Bank Charges $ 0 $ 0 ($ 370) $ 0 ($ 370)Total $ 0 $ 0 ($ 370) $ 0 ($ 370) Ending Balance $ 851,626 $ 479,383 $ 900,985 ($ 5,047) $ 2,226,948Source: City of Turlock[1] Fund balance is negative due to staff charging their time to the fee program after the development had been built out.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 24 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 25
Remaining Improvements
Table 15 details the remaining improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the NTMP Fee Program revenues. The costs are based on the remaining improvement costs detailed in the 2001 NTMP Fee Nexus Study. Because the majority of the improvements have now been completed, the City recently prepared an updated list of remaining improvements.

The 2001 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI for San Francisco from September 2001 through March 2020.

Table 16 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the fee fund balances. All NTMP fee fund components except for the Administration component have net remaining costs that are less than zero, indicating that, at this time, sufficient funds have been collected to fund remaining all improvements. In total, the NTMP fee fund currently has an estimated $1.8 million of surplus funds, as summarized by component below:

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
There is no projected remaining development in the NTMP Area, so there is no future fee revenue to be collected. There is more than sufficient NTMP program revenue available to construct all remaining improvements, so the improvements should be constructed as soon as it is feasible.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sewer ($ 642,000)
Storm Drainage ($ 285,000)
Transportation ($ 901,000)
Administration $ 17,000
Total ($ 1,811,000)
Table 15
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
NTMP-Funded Percentage of Total 100%Sanitary Sewer
Mt View Systems - Payback for Pitman HS Pump Station $ 101,246 $ 0 $ 101,246Kilroy/Walnut Systems - Payback for Pitman HS Pump Station $ 107,996 $ 0 $ 107,996Subtotal $ 209,241 $ 0 $ 209,241 Storm Drainage
1st St. N/O Christoffersen Off Mid Storm Line $ 116,822 $ 0 $ 116,822 2nd St. N/O Christoffersen Off Mid Storm Line $ 77,881 $ 0 $ 77,881Subtotal $ 194,704 $ 0 $ 194,704 Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 403,945 $ 0 $ 403,945Administration - 3% of Costs [2] $ 12,118Total NTMP Area Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 416,063Source: City of Turlock [1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-19 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, July 2020.
[2] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 26 Table 16
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)Item Source Sanitary
Sewer
Storm
Drainage Transportation Administration Total
Remaining Costs Table 15 $ 209,241 $ 194,704 $ 0 $ 12,118 $ 416,063Less Fund Balance Table 14 ($ 851,626) ($ 479,383) ($ 900,985) $ 5,047 ($ 2,226,948)Net Remaining Costs ($ 642,385) ($ 284,680) ($ 900,985) $ 17,165 ($ 1,810,885)Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements Yes Yes Yes No YesPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2020 $)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 27 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 28
East Tuolumne Master Plan
Fee Program Overview
The developable land in the ETMP Area consists of residential uses only. The ETMP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the ETMP Area. The components of the ETMP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Transportation: These improvements include road improvements, irrigation improvements, and underground electrical improvements to roads that border the ETMP area.
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system infrastructure, including a pump station and series of new sewer mains.
 Water: Funds water infrastructure, including a series of water lines.  Administration: Funds administration of the ETMP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 17 shows the current fee schedule for the ETMP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 18 shows the ETMP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal year 2019–20.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the three components. During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from ETMP Area development impact fees. No expenses were incurred.

ETMP Fee Credits
In December 2019 and February 2021, the City entered into Subdivision Improvement Agreements (SIA) between Fairbanks Ranch 1, LLC., and KB Home North Bay, LLC., respectively. Fairbanks Ranch 1, LLC., agreed to build capital improvements for the Fairbanks Ranch Subdivision located in the ETMP Area. KB Home North Bay, LLC., agreed to build capital improvements for the Les Chateaux Subdivision located in the ETMP Area.

Table 19 shows the ETMP Fee Program credit activity Fiscal Year 2019–20.

It summarizes the beginning balance of credits, net any credits used in previous fiscal years, the credits received in Fiscal Year 2019–20, and the remaining balance.

Table 17
Turlock Annual ReportETMP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Transportation Sanitary Sewer Portable Water Admin. Total Residential
Very Low Density $ 13,541.90 $ 4,143.56 $ 3,755.68 $ 1,072.06 $ 22,513.20 Low Density $ 13,541.90 $ 4,143.56 $ 2,933.55 $ 1,030.95 $ 21,649.96Medium/Low Density $ 13,541.90 $ 3,397.00 $ 1,251.49 $ 909.52 $ 19,099.91Medium Density $ 13,541.90 $ 3,297.04 $ 853.84 $ 884.64 $ 18,577.42High Density $ 9,459.33 $ 2,749.36 $ 1,028.27 $ 661.85 $ 13,898.81 Cost Recovery Fee
073-013-003 $ 64,986.00073-013-004 $ 31,532.00073-016-006 $ 31,532.00073-016-007 $ 18,279.00 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per dwelling unit
per acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 29 Table 18
Turlock Annual ReportETMP Fund Summary (FY 2019-20)Item Transportation Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Water Administration [1] TotalBeginning Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 163,000) ($ 163,000)Revenue Interest Income $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Development Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 845 $ 845Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 845 $ 845 Expenses
Bank Charges $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Ending Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 162,155) ($ 162,155)Source: City of Turlock[1] Staff time was charged for administering the fee program before any fees had been collected.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 30 Table 19
Turlock Annual ReportETMP Fee Program Remaining CreditsFund Component Capital Improvements
(Credits Owed) Credits Received Balance
Capital
Improvements
(Credits Owed)
Credits
Received Balance
Transportation $ 1,200,531 $ 985,386
FY 19/20 $ 11,102 $ 1,189,429 $ 0
Subtotal Transportation $ 1,200,531 $ 11,102 $ 1,189,429 $ 985,386 $ 0 $ 985,386 Sanitary Sewer $ 936,382 $ 0
FY 19/20 $ 3,397 $ 932,985 $ 0Subtotal Sewer $ 936,382 $ 3,397 $ 932,985 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Water $ 76,676 $ 366,874
FY 19/20 $ 2,405 $ 74,271 $ 0Subtotal Water $ 76,676 $ 2,405 $ 74,271 $ 366,874 $ 0 $ 366,874 Total $ 2,213,589 $ 16,904 $ 2,196,685 $ 1,352,260 $ 0 $ 1,352,260Source: City of Turlock EMTP Credits
Fairbanks Ranch Les Chateaux
Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 31 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 32
Remaining Improvements
Table 20 details the remaining ETMP Fee Program improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the ETMP Fee Program fees. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2019 ETMP Fee Nexus Study Update. In addition, the 2019 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index (CCI) for San Francisco from September 2019 through March 2020. In total, approximately $1.3 million in improvements remain to be constructed.

Table 21 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the existing fund balance. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all the remaining improvements. For each fee component, additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $1.3 million in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining fee program costs, as summarized by component below:

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
ETMP Fee Program revenue will provide the financing needed to fully fund the remaining improvements and fee administration costs summarized above. The timing and amount of the fee revenue will depend on the rate and amount of development. Fee revenue will be collected at the issuance of building permits for development in the ETMP area. The remaining improvements will be constructed as sufficient fee revenue becomes available. The improvements will be completed in an order to be established by the City.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs Fairbanks Les Chateaux Fairbanks Les Chateaux Fairbanks Les Chateaux Transportation $ 721,000 $ 1,200,531 $ 985,386 ($ 11,102) $ 0 $ 1,189,429 $ 985,386 Sewer $ 0 $ 936,382 $ 0 ($ 3,397) $ 0 $ 932,985 $ 0
Water $ 322,000 $ 76,676 $ 366,874 ($ 76,676) $ 0 $ 0 $ 366,874 Administration $ 214,000
Total $ 1,257,000 $ 2,213,589 $ 1,352,260 ($ 91,175) $ 0 $ 2,122,414 $ 1,352,260 Credits Owed Credits Used Credits Remaining

Page 1 of 2 ends

Table 20Turlock Annual ReportETMP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Total
Cost
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Cost
(2020 $)
ETMP-Funded Percentage of Total 100%
Transportation
Tuolumne Rd Improvements from West Master Plan line to Waring [1] $ 678,072 ($ 678,072) $ 0 $ 0 Waring Rd Improvements from Tuolumne Rd to Monte Vista [2] $ 686,867 ($ 686,867) $ 0 $ 0TID Irrigation Improvements on Tuolumne Rd from West Master Plan line to Waring [3] $ 443,040 ($ 443,040) $ 0 $ 0TID Irrigation Improvements on Waring North of Tuolumne [3] $ 317,844 ($ 317,844) $ 0 $ 0Quincy Rd Improvements from Tuolumne to Monte Vista $ 243,110 $ 0 $ 243,110 $ 251,857Waring Rd Improvements from Tuolumne Rd to Wyndfair #3 [1] $ 264,789 ($ 264,789) $ 0 $ 0TID Electrical Undergrounding on Tuolumne Rd from West Master Plan line to Waring $ 181,720 $ 0 $ 181,720 $ 188,258TID Electrical Undergrounding on Waring North of Tuolumne $ 132,915 $ 0 $ 132,915 $ 137,697TID Electrical Undergrounding on Waring South of Tuolumne $ 138,107 $ 0 $ 138,107 $ 143,076Subtotal $ 3,086,464 ($ 2,390,612) $ 695,853 $ 720,888 Sanitary Sewer [4]
Pump Station at Storm Basin #1 $ 293,125 ($ 293,125) $ 0 $ 0Sewer Force Main in Lafitte Rothchild Dr. (6") $ 7,571 ($ 7,571) $ 0 $ 0Sewer Force Main in Tuolumne Rd (6") $ 57,861 ($ 57,861) $ 0 $ 0Sewer Force Main in Waring south (6") $ 290,975 ($ 290,975) $ 0 $ 0Sewer Force Main in Hawkeye (6") $ 148,709 ($ 148,709) $ 0 $ 0Sewer Main in Tuolumne Rd (8") $ 138,141 ($ 138,141) $ 0 $ 0Sewer Main in Lafitte Rothchild Tuolumne to Pump Station (8" & 10") $ 14,603 ($ 14,603) $ 0 $ 0Subtotal $ 950,984 ($ 950,984) $ 0 $ 0 Remaining Costs (2019 $)
Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 33

Page 2 of 2 ends

Table 20Turlock Annual ReportETMP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Total
Cost
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Cost
(2020 $)
Remaining Costs (2019 $)
Water
Water Line in Tuolumne (10") [1] $ 82,676 ($ 82,676) $ 0 $ 0Water Line in Waring Road North of Tuolumne Road (12") [5] $ 168,950 ($ 168,950) $ 0 $ 0Water Line in Waring Road South of Tuolumne Road (12") [5] $ 168,950 ($ 168,950) $ 0 $ 0Water Line in Monte Vista Ave (24") $ 103,516 $ 0 $ 103,516 $ 107,240 Water Line in Quincy Road (16") $ 315,414 $ 0 $ 315,414 $ 326,762 Less City share for increased size on Quincy (Surface Water Infrastructure) ($ 37,642) $ 0 ($ 37,642) ($ 38,996) Less City share for increased size on Monte Vista (Surface Water Infrastructure) ($ 70,092) $ 0 ($ 70,092) ($ 72,614) Subtotal $ 731,772 ($ 420,576) $ 311,196 $ 322,392
Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 4,769,220 ($ 3,762,172) $ 1,007,048 $ 1,043,280 Administration - 5% of Costs [6] $ 52,164Total ETMP Area Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 1,095,444Source: City of Turlock[1] Project completed by Les Chauteax & Fairbanks in FY 2018-19.[2] Project completed by Les Chauteax in FY 2018-2019.[3] Project completed by Fairbanks in FY 2018-19.[4] All sewer projects were completed by Fairbanks in FY 2017-18.[5] Completed by Les Chauteax in 2017.[6] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 5% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 34 Table 21
Turlock Annual ReportETMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)Item Source Transportation Sanitary Sewer Portable Water Administration Total Remaining Costs Table 20 $ 720,888 $ 0 $ 322,392 $ 52,164 $ 1,095,444 Less Fund Balance Table 18 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 162,155 $ 162,155Net Remaining Costs $ 720,888 $ 0 $ 322,392 $ 214,319 $ 1,257,599Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements No Yes No No NoPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2020 $)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 35 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 36
Master Storm Fee Program
Fee Program Overview
The Master Storm Fee Program is a citywide fee program that provides funding for storm drainage facilities needed to serve development in all areas of the City. As growth in the City occurs and more users are added to the system, the increased level of service will result in capacity deficiencies. The Master Storm Fee Program was established to provide funding for upgrades to existing storm drainage facilities to correct future deficiencies, as well as for construction of new storm drainage system facilities. These facilities include master storm drains and master detention basins. In 2015, the Master Storm Drainage Development Impact Fee Nexus Study was prepared to update the Master Storm Fees based on new land use and growth projections as well as estimated storm drainage facility needs and costs. In addition to other updates, it should be noted that the updated improvements included improvements that had been transferred from the WISP and NWTSP Fee Programs to close the storm drainage components in those two fee programs.

The components of the Master Storm Fee Program are summarized below:
 Storm Drainage: Funds master storm drains and master detention basins.  Administration: Funds administration of the Master Storm Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 22 shows the current fee schedule for the Master Storm Fee Program.

These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. Note that while it is not specified in the City fee schedule, 3 percent of each fee is designated for fee administration, and the remaining amount is designated for capital expenses.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 23 shows the Master Storm Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2019–20. It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance.

Table 22
Turlock Annual ReportMaster Storm Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Fee (effective October 1,
2022)
Residential
Low Density $ 8,702.39Medium Density $ 15,242.05High Density $ 15,242.05 Nonresidential
Commercial $ 21,802.35Office $ 21,802.35Industrial $ 21,802.35 Source: City of Turlock
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 37 Table 23
Turlock Annual ReportMaster Storm Fee Program Fund Summary (FY 2019-20)Item AmountBeginning Balance $ 2,561,800Revenue Interest Income $ 28,634Market Valuation $ 25,122Development Fees - Storm Drainage $ 188,152Development Fees - Administration $ 4,127Total $ 246,036 Less Expenses
Bank Charges ($ 453)Contractual Services
Reporting ($ 1,240)
Transfers Out
Transfers Out W Main Corridor Rehab P1730 [1] ($ 39,198) Total Expenses ($ 40,891)
Ending Balance $ 2,766,945City of Turlock[1] Transferred to Fund 218 Measure L for the W Main Rehabilitation Project Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 38 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 39
During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income and Master Storm development impact fees.

Expenses were incurred for the following items.
 Bank charges.
 Administrative Reporting.
 Transfer from the Master Storm Fee Program fund to Fund 218 Measure L for the W Main Rehabilitation project.

Remaining Improvements
Table 24 details the total and remaining improvement and fee administration costs to be funded by the Master Storm Fee Program, which comprise approximately 53 percent of the total improvement costs. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2015 Master Storm Drainage Development Impact Fee Nexus Study. Table 24 shows deductions for the costs of several portions of storm lines that have been completed since 2015. The 2015 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI for San Francisco from June 2015 through March 2020.

Table 25 summarizes the remaining net costs in 2020 dollars after accounting for the fee fund balance. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all remaining improvements. Additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $48.0 million in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining storm drainage improvements and administrative costs.

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
Future Master Storm Fee Program revenue will provide the financing needed to fully fund the remaining improvements and administration costs discussed above.

The timing and amount of the fee revenue will depend on the rate and amount of development. Fee revenue will be collected at the issuance of final maps for development in the City. The remaining improvements will be constructed as sufficient fee revenue becomes available. The improvements will be completed in an order to be established by the City.

Table 24 Page 1 of 3
Turlock Annual ReportMaster Storm Fee Program Remaining CostsItem Type Description/Street Description/Limits Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Total Improvements Cost (from 2015 Nexus Study) [2] $ 83,828,000Total Master Storm Fee-Funded Cost (from 2015 Nexus Study) [2] $ 44,468,500Master Storm Fee-Funded Percentage of Total 53% Existing Service Area MASTER CIP
PipelinesESD-2 Pipe Christoffersen Pkwy Pump Station No. 31 Wet Well to Walnut Rd (Walnut Pump Station #1 Wet Well) $ 386,330 $ 0 $ 386,330ESD-3 Pipe Monte Vista Dr Four Seasons Dr to Walnut Rd $ 109,100 $ 0 $ 109,100ESD-4 Pipe Countryside Dr West side of Staples/Walmart Shopping Center, parallel to Countryside Dr $ 12,173 $ 0 $ 12,173 ESD-6 Pipe Colorado Ave Waldorf Dr to Tuolumne Rd $ 9,302 $ 0 $ 9,302 ESD-8 Pipe Castleview Dr Quincy Rd to west of Palace Ct $ 71,949 $ 0 $ 71,949 ESD-9 Pipe Johnson Rd Tuolumne Rd to north of Castleview Dr $ 16,021 $ 0 $ 16,021 ESD-14 Pipe Almond Ave Almond Ave and Golden State Blvd $ 26,873 $ 0 $ 26,873 ESD-23 Pipe Montana Ave East of Hwy 99 to West Ave South $ 35,486 $ 0 $ 35,486 ESD-29 Pipe Kilroy Rd Parallel Pipe from Industrial Rowe to Spengler Way $ 28,596 $ 0 $ 28,596 ESD-45 Pipe Quincy Rd Canal Dr to East Ave $ 295,088 $ 0 $ 295,088 ESD-46 Pipe East Ave Quincy Rd to Southeast 2 Area Pump Station (ESD-PS-6) $ 206,200 $ 0 $ 206,200 Pump Stations/BasinsESD-PS-6 Pump Station East Ave East of Daubenberger Rd $ 849,835 $ 0 $ 849,835ESD-FM-1 Force Main East Ave Dual Force Mains to Northern East Linear Basin $ 728,102 $ 0 $ 728,102 ESD-BN-1 Basin Northern East Linear Basin Northern East Linear Basin $ 528,735 $ 0 $ 528,735 Land Acquisition Northern East Linear Basin Northern East Linear Basin $ 643,118 $ 0 $ 643,118 Buildout System Improvements PipelinesFSD-1 Pipe Monte Vista Dr Summer Creek Dr to Four Seasons Dr $ 89,118 $ 0 $ 89,118FSD-3 Pipe Tully Rd Branding Iron Dr to Fulkerth Rd $ 21,016 $ 0 $ 21,016FSD-4 Pipe Oxford Ave, Pedras Rd Jacquelinelee Dr to Northeast of Divanian Dr $ 130,920 $ 0 $ 130,920 FSD-5 Pipe Kilroy Rd Parallel Pipe from Castor St to Industrial Rowe $ 26,931 $ 0 $ 26,931 FSD-6 Pipe Syracuse Ave Palm St to Geer Rd $ 91,817 $ 0 $ 91,817FSD-7 Pipe Golden State Blvd Monroe Ave to Geer Rd $ 21,533 $ 0 $ 21,533FSD-8 Pipe Washington Rd, Canal Dr Fulkerth Rd to Fransil Ln $ 285,958 $ 0 $ 285,958FSD-9 Pipe Unnamed Rd Fulkerth Rd to Canal Dr $ 509,901 $ 0 $ 509,901FSD-10 Pipe Canal Dr Dianne Dr to Fransil Ln $ 76,370 $ 0 $ 76,370 FSD-11 Pipe Tegner Rd South of Fulkerth Rd to Canal Dr $ 310,075 $ 0 $ 310,075 FSD-12 Pipe Tegner Rd North of West Main St to Canal Dr $ 354,863 $ 0 $ 354,863FSD-13 Pipe Fransil Ln Fulkerth Rd to Canal Dr $ 87,969 $ 0 $ 87,969FSD-14 Pipe Fransil Ln Canal Dr to West Main St, to FSD-PS-2 Wet Well $ 111,053 $ 0 $ 111,053 Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 40 Table 24 Page 2 of 3
Turlock Annual ReportMaster Storm Fee Program Remaining CostsItem Type Description/Street Description/Limits Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
FSD-18 Pipe West Main St, Clinton Rd, Fransil Ln Near intersection of West Main St and Clinton Rd, and along Fransil Ln $ 599,478 $ 0 $ 599,478 FSD-19 Pipe West Main St Clinton Rd to Fransil Ln $ 395,058 $ 0 $ 395,058 FSD-20 Pipe West Main St Dianne Dr to Kilroy Rd $ 254,950 $ 0 $ 254,950 FSD-21 Pipe Tegner Rd West Main St to Liberty Square Pkwy $ 616,704 $ 0 $ 616,704FSD-22 Pipe Tegner Rd Linwood Ave to south of Humphrey Ct $ 329,598 $ 0 $ 329,598FSD-23 Pipe Washington Rd, Ruble Rd Clayton Rd to FSD-PS-2 Wet Well $ 788,968 $ 0 $ 788,968FSD-24 Pipe Linwood Ave, Unnamed Rd Linwood Ave and along Unnamed Rd, to FSD-PS-2 Wet Well $ 1,064,590 $ 0 $ 1,064,590 FSD-25 Pipe Ruble Rd Tegner Rd to Unnamed Rd $ 79,586 $ 0 $ 79,586FSD-26 Pipe Linwood Ave Glenwood Ave to Kilroy Rd $ 1,427,492 $ 0 $ 1,427,492 FSD-27 Pipe Kilroy Rd Linwood Ave to Spengler Way $ 721,211 $ 0 $ 721,211FSD-28 Pipe Soderquist Rd South Ave to Jordan Ave $ 446,737 $ 0 $ 446,737FSD-29 Pipe/Casing(1) Highway 99 West of Soderquist Rd to the east side of Highway 99, north of Venture Ln $ 375,535 $ 0 $ 375,535 FSD-30 Pipe North of Venture Ln, Walnut Rd Soderquist Rd to Walnut Rd, Linwood Ave to Venture Ln $ 806,194 $ 0 $ 806,194 FSD-31 Pipe Unnamed Dr South of Hawkeye Ave to north of Canal Dr $ 693,649 $ 0 $ 693,649FSD-32 Pipe Unnamed Dr South of Canal Dr to East Ave $ 729,250 $ 0 $ 729,250 FSD-33 Pipe West of Verduga Rd Connection pipeline from Northern to Southern East Linear Basin $ 84,524 $ 0 $ 84,524 FSD-34 Pipe Johnson Rd South of East Ave to Unnamed Rd $ 218,201 $ 0 $ 218,201FSD-35 Pipe Johnson Rd Unnamed Rd to Brier Rd $ 679,868 $ 0 $ 679,868 FSD-36 Pipe Johnson Rd Brier Rd to Linwood Ave $ 1,328,728 $ 0 $ 1,328,728 FSD-37 Pipe Unnamed Rd, Brier Rd Daubenberger Rd to Johnson Rd $ 1,612,389 $ 0 $ 1,612,389 FSD-38 Pipe South of Brier Rd FSD-BN-5 (Future Basin) to Johnson Rd $ 1,066,887 $ 0 $ 1,066,887 FSD-39 Pipe Linwood Ave West of Verduga Rd to Johnson Rd $ 1,020,950 $ 0 $ 1,020,950 FSD-40 Pipe Paulson Rd Center St to Linwood Ave at Future Pump Station (FSD-PS-3) Wet Well $ 1,419,453 $ 0 $ 1,419,453FSD-41 Pipe Linwood Ave Johnson Rd to 5th St $ 991,091 $ 0 $ 991,091 FSD-42A Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 111,397 $ 0 $ 111,397FSD-42B Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 664,938 $ 0 $ 664,938FSD-42C Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 169,967 $ 0 $ 169,967FSD-42D Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 88,429 $ 0 $ 88,429FSD-42E Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 289,403 $ 0 $ 289,403FSD-42F Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 689,055 $ 0 $ 689,055 FSD-42G Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 60,867 $ 0 $ 60,867FSD-42H Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 365,199 $ 0 $ 365,199FSD-42I Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 113,694 $ 0 $ 113,694 FSD-42J Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 153,889 $ 0 $ 153,889FSD-42K Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 145,850 $ 0 $ 145,850FSD-42L Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 169,967 $ 0 $ 169,967FSD-42M Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 155,037 $ 0 $ 155,037FSD-42N Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 129,772 $ 0 $ 129,772FSD-42O Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 56,273 $ 0 $ 56,273FSD-42P Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 160,780 $ 0 $ 160,780FSD-42Q Pipe Unnamed Rd, parallel to Hwy 99 Morgan Ranch $ 76,944 $ 0 $ 76,944FSD-43 Pipe Lander Ave Southeast 1 Area (FSD-PS-4) to Lander Ave $ 1,081,816 $ 0 $ 1,081,816 FSD-44 Pipe Linwood Ave 5th St to Lander Ave $ 2,159,039 $ 0 $ 2,159,039 FSD-45 Pipe Linwood Ave West Linwood Ave Basin to Harding Drain Outfall $ 2,709,537 $ 0 $ 2,709,537 Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 41 Table 24 Page 3 of 3
Turlock Annual ReportMaster Storm Fee Program Remaining CostsItem Type Description/Street Description/Limits Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Pump Stations/BasinsFSD-PS-1 Pump Station Fransil Ln & West Main St At Fransil Ln and West Main St, Future Pump Station $ 85,673 $ 0 $ 85,673FSD-PS-2 Pump Station Ruble Rd At Ruble Rd and Unnamed Rd, Future Pump Station $ 284,809 $ 0 $ 284,809 FSD-PS-3 Pump Station Linwood Ave At Johnson Rd $ 1,820,254 $ 0 $ 1,820,254 FSD-FM-1 Force Main Linwood Ave Johnson Rd to Verduga Rd (Dual Force Mains) $ 4,305,446 $ 0 $ 4,305,446 FSD-PS-4 Pump Station Unnamed Rd Southeast 1 Area Future Pump station $ 693,649 $ 0 $ 693,649FSD-BN-1 Basin Fransil Ln & West Main St At Fransil Ln and West Main St, Future Retention Basin $ 102,440 $ 0 $ 102,440 Land Acquisition Fransil Ln & West Main St At Fransil Ln and West Main St, Future Retention Basin $ 114,843 $ 0 $ 114,843 FSD-BN-2 Basin Ruble Rd At Ruble Rd and Unnamed Rd, Future Detention Basin $ 409,758 $ 0 $ 409,758 Land Acquisition Ruble Rd At Ruble Rd and Unnamed Rd, Future Detention Basin $ 459,370 $ 0 $ 459,370 FSD-BN-3 Basin Southern East Linear Basin Southern East Linear Basin $ 1,750,200 $ 0 $ 1,750,200 Land Acquisition Southern East Linear Basin Southern East Linear Basin $ 2,325,561 $ 0 $ 2,325,561 FSD-BN-4 Basin Highway 99 Basin Southeast 1 Area, Highway 99 new basin $ 715,469 $ 0 $ 715,469 Land Acquisition Highway 99 Basin Southeast 1 Area, Highway 99 new basin $ 712,024 $ 0 $ 712,024 FSD-BN-5 Basin Unnamed Rd Southeast of Daubenberger Rd and Brier Rd $ 1,024,395 $ 0 $ 1,024,395 Land Acquisition Unnamed Rd Southeast of Daubenberger Rd and Brier Rd $ 1,148,425 $ 0 $ 1,148,425 Total Remaining Improvement Costs $ 49,319,690 $ 0 $ 49,319,690 Fee Administration Cost (3%) [3] $ 1,479,591 $ 0 $ 1,479,591 Total Remaining Cost $ 50,799,280 $ 0 $ 50,799,280
Source: City of Turlock and EPS
[2] From Storm Master Storm Drainage Development Impact Fee Nexus Study, dated September 18, 2015.[1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-19 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, July 2020. [3] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 42 Table 25
Turlock Annual ReportMaster Storm Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)Item Source Total
Remaining Cost
Remaining Costs Table 24 $ 49,319,690
Fee Administration Cost Table 24 $ 1,479,591Less Fund Balance Table 23 ($ 2,766,945)Net Remaining Costs $ 48,032,336Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements NoPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 53% Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 43 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 44
Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program
Fee Program Overview
The Sewer Trunk Capacity (Sewer) Fee Program is a citywide fee program that provides funding for sanitary sewer facilities need to serve development in all areas of the City. The Sewer Fee Program was established to provide funding for the construction of citywide sewer trunk lines or the oversizing of normal-sized sewer lines to be used as sewer trunk lines. In 2015, the Sewer Trunk Capacity Development Impact Fee Nexus Study was prepared to update the Sewer Fees based on new land use and growth projections as well as estimated sewer trunk facility needs and costs.

The components of the Sewer Fee Program are summarized below:
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds construction of sewer trunk lines.  Administration: Funds administration of the Sewer Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 26 shows the current fee schedule for the Sewer Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. Note that while it is not specified in the City fee schedule, 3 percent of each fee is designated for fee administration, and the remaining amount is designated for capital expenses.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 27 shows the Sewer Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal year 2019–20.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance.

During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income, line construction, and Sewer development impact fees.

The following expenses were incurred.
 Bank charges.
 Administrative Reporting.

There were no loans and no refunds made or allocated from the Sewer Fee Program.

Table 26
Turlock Annual ReportSewer Trunk Capacity Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Fee
(effective October 1, 2022)
Residential per dwelling unit
Very Low Density $ 3,052.77Low Density $ 3,052.77Low-Medium Density $ 3,052.77Medium Density $ 2,416.31High Density $ 2,034.72Subtotal Residential Nonresidential and Mixed Use per acre
Downtown $ 254.86Neighborhood Center $ 1,031.93Office $ 636.46Community Commercial/Office $ 763.19Community Commercial $ 889.93Highway Commercial $ 636.46Heavy Commercial $ 636.46Business Park $ 636.46Industrial $ 1,653.12 Source: City of Turlock
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 45 Table 27
Turlock Annual ReportSewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Fund Summary (FY 2019-20)Item AmountBeginning Balance $ 729,115Revenue Interest Income $ 9,852Development Fees - Sewer $ 70,090Line Constructon $ 154,031Total $ 233,973 Expenses
Reporting ($ 1,240)Bank Charges ($ 153)Total ($ 1,393)
Ending Balance $ 961,695Source: City of Turlock
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 46 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 47
Remaining Improvements
Table 28 details the improvement and fee administration costs to be funded by the Sewer Fee Program, which comprise approximately 74 percent of the total costs. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2015 Sewer Trunk Capacity Development Impact Fee Nexus Study. No construction has occurred since 2015, so the remaining improvements to be completed have not changed. The 2015 remaining costs, however, have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI for San Francisco from June 2015 through March 2020.

Table 29 summarizes the remaining net costs in 2020 dollars after accounting for the fee fund balance. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all remaining improvements. Additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $41.4 million in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining sewer improvements.

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
Future Sewer Fee Program revenue will provide the financing needed to fully fund the remaining improvements and administration costs discussed above. The timing and amount of the fee revenue will depend on the rate and amount of development. Fee revenue will be collected at the issuance of building permits for development in the City. The remaining improvements will be constructed as sufficient fee revenue becomes available. The improvements will be completed in an order to be established by the City.

Table 28 Page 1 of 2
Turlock Annual ReportSewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Remaining CostsItem Type Description/Street Description/Limits Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Total Improvements Cost (from 2015 Nexus Study) [2] $ 48,304,500 Total Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee-Funded Cost (from 2015 Nexus Study) [2] $ 35,805,720Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee-Funded Percentage of Total 74% Existing System Improvements
PipelinesESS-1 Pipe W. Main St./N. Soderquist Rd. Julian St. to S. Tully Rd. $ 38,598 $ 0 $ 38,598 ESS-2 Pipe Wayside Dr. N. Denair Ave, to Geer Rd. $ 7,248 $ 0 $ 7,248 ESS-3 Pipe Colorado Ave. North of Escondido Ave. to south of Escondido Ave. $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Projects to Remove Direct Connections to Sewer System(4)ESD-11 Pipe Johnson Rd Marshall St to Canal Dr $ 120,240 $ 0 $ 120,240ESD-17 Pipe D St 6th to Lander Ave $ 201,032 $ 0 $ 201,032 ESD-19 Pipe West South Ave Columbia St to High St $ 42,032 $ 0 $ 42,032 ESD-20 Pipe West South Ave High St to Vermont Ave $ 77,174 $ 0 $ 77,174ESD-21 Pipe West South Ave Vermont Ave to South Ave $ 104,047 $ 0 $ 104,047 ESD-22 Pipe West Ave South South Ave to Linwood Ave $ 403,671 $ 0 $ 403,671ESD-24 Pipe South Ave Corner of West Ave South, remove outfall to existing infrastructure $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ESD-25 Pipe Montana Ave Gabriel St to West Ave South $ 108,009 $ 0 $ 108,009ESD-26 Pipe Lander Ave E St to Linwood Ave, Adjust inverts to match proposed Linwood trunk line $ 339,015 $ 0 $ 339,015ESD-27 Pipe Lander Ave At F St, influent pipe to Pump Station No. 2 Wet Well $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ESD-43 Pipe Canal Drive Johnson Rd and Canal Dr, provides connection to canal trunk line $ 3,675 $ 0 $ 3,675 ESD-47 Pipe Marshall St Berkeley Ave to Johnson Rd $ 307,778 $ 0 $ 307,778ESD-48 Pipe Rose St Merritt St to Canal Dr $ 269,306 $ 0 $ 269,306 ESD-50 Pipe Olive Ave, Golden State Blvd Thor St to southeast of Minerva St $ 748,773 $ 0 $ 748,773ESD-51 Pipe/Casing(1) Golden State Blvd, 1st Street Pipe & Casing under Train Tracks, east of Golden State Blvd $ 174,561 $ 0 $ 174,561ESD-52 Pipe D St 1st St to 6th St $ 589,716 $ 0 $ 589,716 ESD-53 Pipe F St 8th St to Lander Ave $ 145,850 $ 0 $ 145,850ESD-54 Pipe F St Southwest of 8th St, Remove connection to sewer $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ESD-55 Pipe Lander Ave D St to E St $ 203,960 $ 0 $ 203,960 ESD-56 Pipe Lander Ave Linwood Ave to Glenwood Ave $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ESD-57 Pipe Linwood Ave Lander Ave to West Linwood Ave Basin $ 1,722,982 $ 0 $ 1,722,982 ESD-58 Pipe Columbia St Locust St to West Ave South $ 244,615 $ 0 $ 244,615ESD-59 Pipe Castor St, Laurel St Locust St to High St $ 74,648 $ 0 $ 74,648 ESD-60 Pipe High St Laurel St to West Ave South $ 273,325 $ 0 $ 273,325 ESD-61 Pipe Vermont Ave Orange St to West Ave South $ 220,498 $ 0 $ 220,498ESD-62 Pipe Martinez St, Williams Ave Parnell Ave to West Ave South $ 95,319 $ 0 $ 95,319 ESD-63 Pipe Orange St South Ave to Montana Ave $ 283,087 $ 0 $ 283,087 ESD-64 Pipe Lewis St Maple St to Orange St $ 53,402 $ 0 $ 53,402 ESD-65 Pipe Montana Ave Orange St to west of Gabriel St $ 160,780 $ 0 $ 160,780 ESD-66 Pipe/Casing(1) Linwood Ave, under Highway 99 Boring under Highway 99, under Linwood Ave $ 270,454 $ 0 $ 270,454ESD-BN-2 Basin Linwood Ave West Linwood Ave Basin $ 1,561,628 $ 0 $ 1,561,628 Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 48 Table 28 Page 2 of 2
Turlock Annual ReportSewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Remaining CostsItem Type Description/Street Description/Limits Costs
(2020 $) [1]
Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Buildout System Improvements
PipelinesFSS-1A Pipe E. Linwood Ave. Golf Rd. to east of 5th St. $ 171,115 $ 0 $ 171,115FSS-1B Pipe E. Linwood Ave. S. Johnson Rd. to Golf Rd. $ 298,591 $ 0 $ 298,591FSS-2 Pipe S. Johnson Rd. Briar Rd. to E. Linwood Ave. $ 534,018 $ 0 $ 534,018 FSS-3 Pipe S. Johnson Rd. South of East Ave. to Brier Rd. $ 176,857 $ 0 $ 176,857 FSS-4 Pipe E. Linwood Ave. S. Quincy Rd. to S. Johnson Rd. $ 218,201 $ 0 $ 218,201 FSS-5 Pipe E. Linwood Ave. East of S. Quincy Rd. to S. Quincy Rd. $ 174,561 $ 0 $ 174,561FSS-6 Pipe Brier Rd. S. Quincy Rd. to S. Johnson Rd. $ 215,904 $ 0 $ 215,904 FSS-7 Pipe Brier Rd. S. Daubenberger Rd. to S. Quincy Rd. $ 179,154 $ 0 $ 179,154FSS-8 Pipe Alley north of East Ave. N. Berkeley Avenue to Bell St. $ 375,535 $ 0 $ 375,535FSS-9 Pipe East Ave. N. Quincy Rd. to N. Berkeley Ave. $ 614,407 $ 0 $ 614,407 FSS-10 Pipe East Ave. West of N. Verduga Rd. to N. Quincy Rd. $ 539,760 $ 0 $ 539,760FSS-11 Pipe West of N. Verduga Rd. Canal Dr. to East Ave. $ 445,589 $ 0 $ 445,589 FSS-12 Pipe West of N. Verduga Rd. South of Hawkeye to Canal Dr. $ 169,967 $ 0 $ 169,967FSS-13 Pipe E. Glenwood Ave. 5th St. to Golf Rd. $ 195,232 $ 0 $ 195,232 FSS-14 Pipe Golf Rd. South of E. Glenwood Ave to E. Glenwood Ave. $ 180,303 $ 0 $ 180,303FSS-15 Pipe W. Glenwood Ave. West of Lander Avenue to east of S. Walnut Rd. $ 390,465 $ 0 $ 390,465 FSS-16 Pipe W. Glenwood Ave. West of Lander Avenue to south of Linwood Ave. $ 265,286 $ 0 $ 265,286FSS-24 Pipe East of S. Washington Rd. South of West Main St. to West Main St. $ 181,451 $ 0 $ 181,451FSS-28 Pipe Christoffersen Pkwy./N. Waring Rd. Redirect Denair flows to 24-inch sewer on Christoffersen $ 1,754,794 $ 0 $ 1,754,794 FSS-29 Pipe Golf Road Glenwood Ave. to E. Linwood Ave. $ 289,403 $ 0 $ 289,403 Lift StationsLS-MR Lift Station Morgan Ranch Assumed 2 pumps $ 933,670 $ 0 $ 933,670LS-4 Lift Station Kilroy Road Assumed 3 pumps $ 2,020,080 $ 0 $ 2,020,080 LS-50 Lift Station Tegner Road Assumed 3 pumps $ 7,659,995 $ 0 $ 7,659,995 Force Main N. Walnut Rd. Extend existing 18-inch force main $ 569,619 $ 0 $ 569,619 LS-57 Lift Station Piccadilly Lane Assumed 2 pumps $ 3,264,973 $ 0 $ 3,264,973LS-63 Lift Station Fulkerth/Tegner Assumed 2 pumps $ 2,778,040 $ 0 $ 2,778,040 LS-67 Lift Station Humphrey Ct. Assumed 2 pumps $ 1,011,763 $ 0 $ 1,011,763LS-GS Lift Station Golden State Blvd. Assumed 3 pumps (current capacity unknown) $ 1,714,599 $ 0 $ 1,714,599LS-Main Lift Station Main St. Near Clinton Rd. Assumed 3 pumps (current capacity unknown) $ 2,570,175 $ 0 $ 2,570,175LS-Ind Lift Station New Industrial Lift Station Assumed 2 pumps $ 1,639,951 $ 0 $ 1,639,951 Force Main S. Washington Rd. W. Linwood Ave. to W. Main St. $ 1,092,152 $ 0 $ 1,092,152 Land Acquisition Corner of S. Washington Rd. and W. Linwood Ave. Land Acquisition assumed 0.25 acres $ 21,820 $ 0 $ 21,820 Less Lift Station in WISP [3] ($ 324,500) ($ 324,500)
Total Remaining Improvement Costs $ 41,168,351 $ 41,168,351 Fee Administration Cost (3%) [4] $ 1,235,051 $ 1,235,051 Total Remaining Cost $ 42,403,402 $ 42,403,402
Source: City of Turlock[2] From Sewer Trunk Capacity Development Impact Fee Nexus Study dated October 20, 2015.[3] Costs adjusted to exclude lift station that is also in the WISP Fee Program. [1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-19 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, July 2020.[4] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 49 Table 29
Turlock Annual ReportSewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)Item Source Total
Remaining Cost
Remaining Costs Table 28 $ 41,168,351Fee Administration Costs Table 28 $ 1,235,051Less Fund Balance Table 27 ($ 961,695)Net Remaining Costs $ 41,441,707Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements NoPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 74% Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 50 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 51
Capital Facilities Fee Program
Fee Program Overview
The CFF Program is a citywide fee program that funds new and expanded infrastructure and facilities needed to serve new development in the City. The CFF Program provides funding for transportation, general government, fire, and police facilities. In 2013, the CFF Nexus Study was prepared to update the CFF fees based on new land use and growth projections as well as updated facility needs and costs.

The components of the CFF Program are summarized below:
 Roadways: Funds new and expanded roadways, interchanges, freeway and railroad overcrossings, and other projects such as intersection signalizations, multimodal facilities, and planning studies. In addition to other identified citywide improvements, the 2013 CFF Nexus Study includes improvements that were transferred from the WISP and NWTSP Fee Programs to close the transportation components in those two fee programs.
 General Government: Funds City building construction and expansion, downtown parking facilities, land acquisition for the corporation yard expansion, and General Plan implementation studies. This fee component is also referred to as Administration Projects.
 Police: Funds public safety facility expansion, animal services facility expansion, and police vehicles and equipment.
 Fire: Funds a new fire training facility and fire station (including land acquisition), fire vehicles, and equipment.
 Contingency: This component, previously referred to as a surcharge component, was established by the City in 1987 to ensure that a positive cash flow was achieved in the CFF Fund. A surcharge was collected on new development through 1991 to provide the additional needed funding. The surcharge is no longer collected, but the remaining surcharge funds that were not expended are accounted for in the Contingency Component and could be used to provide funding for any of the CFF Program facilities as needed.  Administration: Funds administration of the CFF Program.

Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 52
Current Fee Schedule
Table 30 shows the current fee schedule for the CFF Program. As shown in Table 30, the CFF has a different set of fees for each of three City zones. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. Note that while it is not specified in the City fee schedule, the total fees collected for a particular land use in a particular City zone are distributed to the CFF components outlined above, with the distribution based on the 2013 CFF Nexus Study percentage distribution of the total fee rate among the fee components.

Fee Fund Activity
Table 31 details the CFF Program Fund activity for Fiscal year 2019–20.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the five components.

During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest earnings, CFF Program development impact fees, and transfers from other City funds. The transfers are summarized below:
 Transfer to the CFF General Government fund component from the City Water Quality and Water Enterprise Funds for rent payments for space in a City building that was funded by the CFF Program.
 Transfer to the CFF Roadways component as a result from the City receiving an SB 1 grant from the State of California.

Expenses were incurred for the following items:
 Bank charges.
 City Engineering Services
 Administrative Reporting.
 State Route 99/Fulkerth Road Interchange improvements.  Golf Road/Berkeley Avenue/Golden State Boulevard Intersection improvements.

Table 30
Turlock Annual ReportCFF Program Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022) Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
Land Use Fee Basis
Downtown
PPA
Master Plan
Areas
City
Infill
Residential
Single Family per dwelling unit $ 14,951.67 $ 18,244.35 $ 16,307.92Multifamily per dwelling unit $ 10,758.80 $ 13,155.79 $ 11,705.34Senior Assisted Living per bed $ 4,267.63 $ 5,217.16 $ 4,647.442nd Unit/Accessory Unit per dwelling unit $ 8,307.98 $ 10,063.48 $ 9,136.38 Mobile Home per dwelling unit $ 7,922.19 $ 9,674.70 $ 8,632.46 Nonresidential and Mixed Use
Retail (< 100,000 sq. ft.) per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 16,101.57 $ 19,404.72 $ 17,812.21Retail (>=100,000 sq. ft.) per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 16,034.28 $ 19,315.00 $ 17,744.92Gas Station per VFP [1] $ 9,860.12 $ 11,908.70 $ 10,885.90Hotel/Motel per room $ 5,272.49 $ 6,364.07 $ 5,822.76Office per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 8,436.57 $ 10,253.38 $ 9,256.01Medical Office per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 13,809.25 $ 16,678.76 $ 15,241.76Hospital per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 5,517.72 $ 6,716.96 $ 6,042.57Institutional/Assembly per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 3,676.98 $ 4,463.52 $ 4,038.85 Industrial (<25,000 sq. ft.) per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 2,693.06 $ 3,297.17 $ 2,932.32Industrial (>=25,000 sq. ft.) per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 2,096.43 $ 2,555.50 $ 2,295.31Warehouse per 1,000 sq. ft. $ 1,954.38 $ 2,370.08 $ 2,147.27 Source: City of Turlock[1] Vehicle fueling position.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 53 Table 31
Turlock Annual ReportCFF Program Fund Summary (FY 2019-20)Item Roadways Police General
Government/
Administration Fire
Contingency
Reserve Administration Total
Beginning Balance $ 9,506,621 ($ 638,795) $ 807,967 $ 1,532,926 $ 211,726 $ 1,044,899 $ 12,465,344Revenue Market Valuation $ 91,883 $ 0Interest Income $ 85,946 $ 0 ($ 2,330) $ 12,166 $ 1,682 $ 0 $ 97,464Development Fees $ 2,053,955 $ 83,904 $ 84,942 $ 47,227 $ 0 $ 174,978 $ 2,445,006Transfers In SR-99/Fulkerth Road Interchange [1] $ 4,075,419 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4,075,419Transfers In From Fd 410&420BCH Rent-Coll&Bill $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,800 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 15,800Transfers In Fire Ventilation Prop $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Total Revenue $ 6,307,204 $ 83,904 $ 98,412 $ 59,393 $ 1,682 $ 174,978 $ 6,633,690 Less Expenses
Bank Charges ($ 1,193) $ 0 ($ 187) ($ 329) ($ 43) $ 0 ($ 1,752)Capital Outlay City Engineering Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 10,718) ($ 10,718)Reporting $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 9,301) ($ 9,301)Construction Project [2] $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Contributed Capital Expense $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Contributed Capital-Contra Expense $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0SR 99/Fulkerth Rd Interchange ($ 9,932,657) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 9,932,657)Golf/Berkeley/GSB Intersection ($ 2,687) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 2,687)Fire Capital Ventilation Training Prop $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Subtotal ($ 9,935,345) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 20,019) ($ 9,955,364) Transfers Out
Transfers Out To Fd215 Fulkerth/GSB Signal 1428 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Transfers Out Lander/F St Signal $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Transfers Out To Fd215 Wayside/Olive Signal1365 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Transfers Out To Tegner & Main Signal P1444 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Transfers Out SR-99/Fulkerth Road Interchange $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Transfers Out To Fd 502 Engineering Admin $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Transfers Out To Fd 110 Admin & Acctg Service $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Subtotal $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Total Expenses ($ 9,936,538) $ 0 ($ 187) ($ 329) ($ 43) ($ 20,019) ($ 9,957,116) Ending Balance $ 5,877,288 ($ 554,891) $ 906,192 $ 1,591,990 $ 213,365 $ 1,199,858 $ 9,141,919Source: City of Turlock[1] The $4,075,419 transferred in for SR-99/Fulkerth Road Interchange is a result of the City receiving an SB 1, also known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act, Grant from the State of California.
[2] These expenses are associated with Project 0828 - SR/99/Fulkerth and Project 1479 - Intersection Improvements at Golden State-Golf-Berkley Ave.

The majority of the expenses are assocatied with Project 0828.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 54 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2019–20
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 55
Remaining Improvements
Table 32 details the remaining improvement and fee administration costs to be funded by the CFF Program. The CFF Program will fund approximately 44 percent of the total identified improvement costs. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2013 CFF Nexus Study. For each fee component, the costs of items completed since 2013 are deducted from the CFF Nexus Study costs, resulting in the current remaining costs in 2013 dollars. Table 33 provides backup detail for the costs of completed improvements. The 2013 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering NewsRecord CCI for San Francisco from September 2013 through March 2020.

Table 34 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the fee fund balances. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all remaining improvements. Additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $229.2 million in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining fee program costs, as summarized by component below:

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
Future CFF Program revenue will provide the financing needed to fully fund the remaining improvements and fee administration costs summarized above. The timing and amount of the fee revenue will depend on the rate and amount of development. Fee revenue will be collected at the issuance of building permits.

The remaining improvements will be constructed as sufficient fee revenue becomes available. The improvements will be completed in an order to be established by the City.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Transportation $ 190,602,000
General Government $ 18,768,000
Police $ 7,507,000
Fire $ 6,927,000
Contingency ($ 213,000)
Administration $ 5,643,000
Total $ 229,234,000
Table 32
Turlock Annual ReportCFF Program Remaining CostsProject Assumption Transportation General
Government Police Fire Total Notes
Total Improvements Cost (from 2013 Nexus Study) $ 420,655,870 $ 16,582,589 $ 6,823,050 $ 13,750,538 $ 457,812,047 Total CFF-Funded Cost (from 2013 Nexus Study) [1] $ 170,640,022 $ 15,403,930 $ 6,823,050 $ 7,262,086 $ 200,129,088 CFF-Funded Percentage of Total 41% 93% 100% 53% 44%
Total CFF-Funded Improvement Costs (2020 $) [2] $ 202,900,651 $ 18,212,977 $ 8,413,003 $ 8,518,497 $ 238,045,127Less Completed Projects [3] 440' of 1,840 Fulkerth RD Median Landscaping $ 0 $ 0 partially complete Washington / W Main Intersection $ 0 $ 0 partially completeSR 99/Fulkerth Rd Interchange ($ 9,932,657) ($ 9,932,657) partially completeGolf/Berkeley/GSB Intersection ($ 2,687) ($ 2,687) partially completeDowntown Parking - 129 S. Broadway $ 0 $ 0 partially completeGeneral Plan Update $ 0 $ 0 partially completeProject: 1673 - City Hall Renovation $ 0 $ 0 partially completeFire Training Facility $ 0 $ 0 partially completeTotal ($ 9,935,345) $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 9,935,345) Remaining CFF-Funded Improvement Costs A $ 192,965,306 $ 18,212,977 $ 8,413,003 $ 8,518,497 $ 228,109,783 Administration [4] 3% $ 5,788,959 $ 546,389 $ 252,390 $ 255,555 $ 6,843,293Interfund Transfers Owed FY 2018-19 [5] $ 3,513,788 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3,513,788
Total Remaining CFF-Funded Cost (2020 $) $ 202,268,054 $ 18,759,366 $ 8,665,393 $ 8,774,051 $ 238,466,864Source: City of Turlock[1] Transportation amount adjusted to account for $5.5 million in overcrossing projects that are not CFF Funded ($176,163,804-$5,523,782)[3] See Table 33.[5] Transfer from General Government to Transportation in previous fiscal year is owed back to the General Government Component of the CFF Fund.[2] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2018-19 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, July 2020.[4] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 56 Table 33 Page 1 of 2
Turlock Annual ReportCFF Project Costs Incurred Detail
Project Transportation
General
Government Police Fire Total
440' of 1,840 Fulkerth RD Median Landscaping (partially complete 9/24/13) [1] $ 54,674 $ 54,674Washington/W Main Intersection (partially complete 1/22/13) $ 44,693 $ 44,693Golden State Blvd/Hawkeye Ave Traffic Signal and Turn Lanes (complete 5/22/18) $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Fulkerth Rd/Diane Traffic Signal and Intersection Realignment (complete 7/14/15) $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 Washington Rd/W Main St Traffic Signal (complete 1/22/13) $ 220,000 $ 220,000 SR 99/Fulkerth Rd Interchange (partially complete)
FY 2013-14 $ 396,468 $ 396,468FY 2014-15 $ 1,220,250 $ 1,220,250FY 2015-16 $ 106,288 $ 106,288FY 2016-17 $ 29,363 $ 29,363FY 2017-18 $ 659,992 $ 659,992FY 2018-19 $ 1,434,581 $ 1,434,581FY 2019-20 $ 9,932,657 $ 9,932,657Total SR 99/Fulkerth Rd Interchange $ 13,779,599 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,779,599 Golf/Berkeley/GSB Intersection (partially complete)
FY 2014-15 $ 2,249 $ 2,249
FY 2015-16 $ 7,961 $ 7,961
FY 2016-17 $ 5,638 $ 5,638
FY 2017-18 $ 1,104 $ 1,104
FY 2018-19 $ 1,812 $ 1,812
FY 2019-20 $ 2,687 $ 2,687
Total Golf/Berkeley/GSB Intersection $ 21,452 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 21,452 Downtown Parking Study (complete)
FY 2015-16 $ 65,208 $ 65,208
FY 2016-17 $ 4,600 $ 4,600
Total Downtown Parking Study $ 0 $ 69,808 $ 0 $ 0 $ 69,808 Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 57 Table 33 Page 2 of 2
Turlock Annual ReportCFF Project Costs Incurred Detail
Project Transportation
General
Government Police Fire Total
Downtown Parking - 129 S. Broadway (partially complete) FY 2015-16 $ 40,024 $ 40,024
FY 2016-17 $ 384,325 $ 384,325FY 2017-18 $ 31,215 $ 31,215FY 2018-19 $ 0 $ 0FY 2019-20 $ 0 $ 0Total Downtown Parking - 129 S. Broadway $ 0 $ 455,564 $ 0 $ 0 $ 455,564 General Plan Update: FY 2013-14 (partially complete) $ 0 $ 13,685 $ 0 $ 0 $ 13,685Recreation Facilities Prioritization & Feasibility Study (complete FY 16-17) $ 0 $ 75,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 75,000Project: 1673 - City Hall Renovation (partially complete) FY 2016-17 $ 17,935 $ 17,935FY 2017-18 $ 987 $ 987FY 2018-19 $ 0 $ 0FY 2019-20 $ 0 $ 0Total Project: 1673 - City Hall Renovation $ 0 $ 18,922 $ 0 $ 0 $ 18,922 Fire Training Facility (partially complete)
FY 2016-17 $ 210,265 $ 210,265FY 2017-18 $ 86,076 $ 86,076FY 2018-19 $ 57,138 $ 57,138FY 2019-20 $ 0 $ 0Total Fire Training Facility $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 353,480 $ 353,480 Total $ 16,020,419 $ 632,980 $ 0 $ 353,480 $ 17,006,878 Source: City of Turlock[1] 440' of 1840' median completed; cost incurred estimated as 440/1840 * $228,637 (total cost).

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20 58 Table 34
Turlock Annual Report
CFF Program Net Remaining Costs (2020 $)
Item Source Transportation
General
Government Police Fire Contingency Administration Total Remaining CFF-Funded Cost (2020 $) [1] Table 32 $ 196,479,094 $ 18,212,977 $ 8,413,003 $ 8,518,497 $ 0 $ 6,843,293 $ 238,466,864 Less Fund Balance Table 31 ($ 5,877,288) $ 554,891 ($ 906,192) ($ 1,591,990) ($ 213,365) ($ 1,199,858) ($ 9,233,802) Net Remaining Costs $ 190,601,807 $ 18,767,868 $ 7,506,812 $ 6,926,507 ($ 213,365) $ 5,643,435 $ 229,233,063 Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements No No No No N/A No No Percent of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program Table 32 41% 93% 100% 53% N/A 100% 44% [1] Costs funded by the CFF Program only. Total capital facilities costs and percentages funded by CFF Program are shown on Table 32.

Cost (2020 $)
Prepared by EPS 9/6/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m1 FY19-20.xlsx Final Report
Turlock Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2020–21
Prepared for:

City of Turlock
Prepared by:

Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS)
August 2023
EPS #222113
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................. 1 Overview ........................................................................................... 1 Organization of the Report ................................................................... 2 Westside Industrial Specific Plan ..................................................... 3 Fee Program Overview ......................................................................... 3 Current Fee Schedule .......................................................................... 3 Fee Fund Activity ................................................................................ 3 Remaining Improvements .................................................................... 6 Northwest Triangle Specific Plan ..................................................... 9 Fee Program Overview ......................................................................... 9 Current Fee Schedule .......................................................................... 9 Fee Fund Activity ................................................................................ 9 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 12 Northeast Turlock Master Plan ....................................................... 15 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 15 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 15 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 15 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 18 North Turlock Master Plan ............................................................. 22 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 22 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 22 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 22 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 25 East Tuolumne Master Plan ........................................................... 28 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 28 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 28 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 28 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 32 Master Storm Fee Program ............................................................ 36 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 36 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 36 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 36 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 39 Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program ................................................ 44 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 44 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 44 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 44 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 47 Capital Facilities Fee Program ........................................................ 51 Fee Program Overview ....................................................................... 51 Current Fee Schedule ........................................................................ 52 Fee Fund Activity .............................................................................. 52 Remaining Improvements .................................................................. 55 List of Tables
Table 1. WISP Development Impact Fees ................................................... 4 Table 2. WISP Fee Program Fund Summary ................................................ 5 Table 3. WISP Fee Program Remaining Costs .............................................. 7 Table 4. WISP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ........................................ 8 Table 5. NTWSP Development Impact Fees ............................................... 10 Table 6. NWTSP Fee Program Fund Summary ........................................... 11 Table 7. NWTSP Fee Program Remaining Costs ......................................... 13 Table 8. NWTSP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs .................................... 14 Table 9. NETMP Development Impact Fees ............................................... 16 Table 10. NETMP Fee Program Summary .................................................... 17 Table 11. NETMP Fee Program Remaining Costs .......................................... 19 Table 12. NETMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs .................................... 21 Table 13. NTMP Development Impact Fees ................................................. 23 Table 14. NTMP Fee Summary .................................................................. 24 Table 15. NTMP Fee Program Remaining Costs ............................................ 26 Table 16. NTMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ...................................... 27 Table 17. ETMP Development Impact Fees ................................................. 29 Table 18. ETMP Fee Program Fund Summary .............................................. 30 Table 19. ETMP Fee Program Remaining Credits .......................................... 31 Table 20. ETMP Fee Program Remaining Costs (2 pages) .............................. 33 Table 21. ETMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ...................................... 35 Table 22. Master Storm Development Impact Fees ...................................... 37 Table 23. Master Storm Fee Program Fund Summary ................................... 38 Table 24. Master Storm Fee Program Remaining Costs (3 pages) ................... 40 Table 25. Master Storm Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ........................... 43 Table 26. Sewer Trunk Capacity Development Impact Fees ........................... 45 Table 27. Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Fund Summary ....................... 46 Table 28. Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Remaining Costs (2 pages) ....... 48 Table 29. Sewer Trunk Capacity Fee Program Net Remaining Costs ................ 50 Table 30. CFF Program Development Impact Fees ....................................... 53 Table 31. CFF Program Fund Summary ...................................................... 54 Table 32. CFF Program Remaining Costs .................................................... 56 Table 33. CFF Project Costs Incurred Detail (3 pages) .................................. 57 Table 34. CFF Program Net Remaining Costs .............................................. 60 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 1
Introduction
Overview
The Mitigation Fee Act (California Government Code 66000 et seq.) was enacted by the State of California in 1987 to establish requirements for development impact fee (DIF) programs. Section 66006(b) of the Mitigation Fee Act requires local agencies to submit an Annual Report each year detailing the status of their DIF programs.

For each established development impact fee fund, the local agency shall, within 180 days after the end of each fiscal year, report the following information and make it available to the public:

1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund.

2. The amount of the fee.

3. The beginning and ending balance of the fund.

4. The amount of fees collected and the interest earned.

8. The amount of any refunds made or allocated from the fee fund.

Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 2
The City of Turlock (City) engaged Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) to prepare this document, which serves as the Fiscal year 2020–21 Annual Report for several active City fee programs. Specifically, the information in this report is presented to comply with the aforementioned requirements for the following seven City development impact fee programs:
 Westside Industrial Specific Plan (WISP) Fee Program
 Northwest Turlock Specific Plan (NWTSP) Fee Program
 Northeast Turlock Master Plan (NETMP) Fee Program
 North Turlock Master Plan (NTMP) Fee Program
 East Tuolumne Master Plan (ETMP) Fee Program
 Master Storm (Storm) Fee Program
 Sewer Trunk Capacity (Sewer) Fee Program
 Capital Facilities Fee (CFF) Program
The first five fee programs listed above are fee programs for specific plan or master plan areas, and the remaining three programs are citywide fee programs.

The information needed for the required reporting for each fee program was obtained from the City. For each fee program, the City provided the reports and data listed below:
 Most recent Development Impact Fee Nexus Study (or Update).  Fund balances, revenue, and expenses for fiscal year 2020–21.  Remaining improvements to be constructed and estimated construction costs.  Current fee schedule.

Organization of the Report
Following this introduction, each chapter of this report focuses on one fee program, providing the Mitigation Fee Act required annual reporting for Fiscal year 2020–21. The report is organized as follows:
 Chapter 1: Introduction
 Chapter 2: Westside Industrial Specific Pan Fee Program  Chapter 3: Northwest Triangle Specific Plan Fee Program  Chapter 4: Northeast Turlock Master Plan Fee Program
 Chapter 5: North Turlock Master Plan Fee Program
 Chapter 6: East Tuolumne Master Plan Fee Program
 Chapter 7: Master Storm Fee Program
 Chapter 8: Sewer Trunk Capacity Development Fee Program  Chapter 9: Capital Facilities Fee Program
Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 3
Westside Industrial Specific Plan
Fee Program Overview
The WISP Area includes land zoned for commercial, office, and industrial uses.

The WISP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the WISP Area.

The WISP fees originally funded transportation, storm drainage, recycled water, sanitary sewer, and potable water improvements needed to serve the WISP Area.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 1 shows the current fee schedule for the WISP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 2 shows the WISP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2020–21.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the three components. During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income and WISP Area development impact fees, and the following expenses were incurred:
 City Engineering Services.
 Administrative Reporting.

Table 1
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Business Park $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Community Commercial $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Highway Commercial $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Industrial $ 8,057.29 $ 5,018.75 $ 391.97 $ 13,468.01Office $ 2,858.52 $ 1,141.09 $ 120.49 $ 4,120.10 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 4 Table 2
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Fee Program Fund Summary (FY 2020-2021)Item Sanitary Sewer Water Administration [1] Total Beginning Balance $ 337,318 $ 361,171 ($ 236,409) $ 462,080Revenue Interest Income $ 1,338 $ 1,440 $ 0 $ 2,778Development Fees $ 72,191 $ 180,844 $ 7,591 $ 260,626 Total Revenue $ 73,529 $ 182,284 $ 7,591 $ 263,403
Expenses
City Engineering Services $ 0 $ 0 ($ 1,930) ($ 1,930)
Reporting $ 0 $ 0 ($ 259) ($ 259)Total $ 0 $ 0 ($ 2,188) ($ 2,188) Ending Balance $ 410,846 $ 543,454 ($ 231,006) $ 723,295 Source: City of Turlock
[1] The original fee program nexus study had more improvements than what the most recent update included. Staff projected to receive higher administration revenue because budget estimates were based on a percentage of theoriginal projects listed.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 5 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 6
Remaining Improvements
Table 3 details the remaining WISP Fee Program improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the WISP Fee Program fees. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2013 WISP Fee Nexus Study Update, and the subsequent AB1600 Annual Reports. The remaining costs have been updated to 2021 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index (CCI) for San Francisco from March 2020 through September 2021. In total, approximately $10.0 million in improvements remain to be constructed.

Table 4 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the existing fund balance. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all remaining improvements. For each fee component, additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $9.3 million in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining fee program costs, as summarized by component below:

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sanitary Sewer $ 3,545,000
Water $ 5,217,000
Administration $ 522,000
Total $ 9,284,000
Table 3
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs [1] Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Cost
(2021$)
Cost Adjustment
San Francisco CCI - March 2020 [1] 1,012.13San Francisco CCI - September 2021 1,073.21Cost Increase Factor 1.06 WISP-Funded Percentage of Costs 100%
Sanitary Sewer
5 15' Gravity in Clinton from W. Main 2100' to north $ 412,692 $ 0 $ 412,692 $ 437,598 13 10" Gravity in Washington from W. Main 1400' to south $ 211,637 $ 0 $ 211,637 $ 224,41019 12" Gravity in Washington from Linwood 2800' to north $ 465,601 $ 0 $ 465,601 $ 493,70120 12" Force Main in Washington from Linwood to W. Main $ 816,313 $ 0 $ 816,313 $ 865,57921 12' Gravity in future road from Linwood 2800' to north $ 465,601 $ 0 $ 465,601 $ 493,70122 10" Gravity in Tegner from Linwood 732' to north $ 151,169 $ 0 $ 151,169 $ 160,29223 10" Gravity in Kilroy from Linwood 1700' to north [2] $ 256,987 $ 0 $ 256,987 $ 272,49624 15' Gravity in Linwood from Washington 2600' East $ 510,951 $ 0 $ 510,951 $ 541,788 P5 Proposed Pump Station at Washington and Linwood $ 439,574 $ 0 $ 439,574 $ 466,103 Subtotal $ 3,730,525 $ 0 $ 3,730,525 $ 3,955,668
Water
8 12" Water Line in Canal from Washington 2600 east [3] $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 09 12" Water Line in Canal from Fransil to Diane $ 393,040 $ 0 $ 393,040 $ 416,760 10 12" Water Line in Canal from Diane to Walnut $ 196,520 $ 0 $ 196,520 $ 208,38015 12" Water Line in Washington from W. Main to Ruble $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,157 $ 432,79017 12" Water in Ruble from Washington to Tegner [4] $ 343,280 $ 0 $ 343,280 $ 363,99719 12" Water Line in Washington from Ruble to Linwood $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,157 $ 432,79021 12" Water in Tegner from Linwood 1300 feet north $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,157 $ 432,79022 12" Water in Kilroy from Linwood 1732' to North [5] $ 261,825 $ 0 $ 261,825 $ 277,62623 12" Water in Linwood from Washington to Tegner $ 816,313 $ 0 $ 816,313 $ 865,57925 12" Water in Linwood from Tegner to Kilroy $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,157 $ 432,79026 12" Water in Linwood from Kilroy to Walnut $ 408,157 $ 0 $ 408,157 $ 432,790 W5 New Potable Well Near Linwood and Washington $ 1,380,373 $ 0 $ 1,380,373 $ 1,463,680 Subtotal $ 5,432,136 $ 0 $ 5,432,136 $ 5,759,972
Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 9,162,661 $ 0 $ 9,162,661 $ 9,715,640Administration - 3% of Costs [6] $ 291,469Total WISP Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 10,007,109Source: City of Turlock[4] Updated remaining costs as TID completed 2600' in 2004 from Tegner west to Washington. Remaining LF is 2800.[5] Updated the LF to 1732' (&remaining costs) per partial project completion as reported in the FY18/19 Annual Report.[6] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.
[1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, December 2022.

Costs (2020$)
[2] Updated the LF to 1700' (&remaining costs) per partial project completion as reported in the FY18/19 Annual Report.[3] Project complete. Hilmar Cheese installed 2652' in 2015-2016. COT & developer entered into reimbursement agreement.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 7 Table 4
Turlock Annual ReportWISP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2021$)Item Source Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Remaining Costs Table 3 $ 3,955,668 $ 5,759,972 $ 291,469 $ 10,007,109Less Fund Balance Table 2 ($ 410,846) ($ 543,454) $ 231,006 ($ 723,295)Net Remaining Costs $ 3,544,822 $ 5,216,518 $ 522,475 $ 9,283,815Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements No No No NoPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2021$)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 8 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 9
Northwest Triangle Specific Plan
Fee Program Overview
The NWTSP Area includes land zoned for residential and commercial uses. The NWTSP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the NWTSP Area. The NWTSP fees originally funded transportation, storm drainage, and sanitary sewer improvements needed to serve the NWTSP Area. In 2013, a NWTSP Fee Nexus Study Update was prepared in which the transportation and storm drainage were removed from the NWTSP Fee Program and added to the citywide fee programs for such facilities. The projects and any existing funds for these former NWTSP Fee Program components were moved to the citywide fee programs. In addition, water improvements specific to the NWTSP were added to the NWTSP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 5 shows the current fee schedule for the NWTSP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 6 shows the NWTSP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2020–21. It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the three components.

During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income and NWTSP Area development impact fees, and the following expenses were incurred:
 Bank charges.
 Administrative Reporting.

There were no loans and no refunds made or allocated from the NWTSP Fee Program.

Table 5
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Residential
Low Density $ 33.39 $ 1,483.70 $ 45.01 $ 1,562.10
Low-Medium Density $ 27.58 $ 927.68 $ 29.04 $ 984.30Medium Density $ 23.23 $ 673.62 $ 20.32 $ 717.17High Density $ 23.23 $ 974.13 $ 30.49 $ 1,027.85 Nonresidential
Community Commercial $ 107.43 $ 3,546.66 $ 110.33 $ 3,764.42 Highway Commercial $ 107.43 $ 3,546.66 $ 110.33 $ 3,764.42 Heavy Commercial $ 107.43 $ 3,546.66 $ 110.33 $ 3,764.42 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per dwelling unit
per developable acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 10 Table 6
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Fee Program Fund Summary (FY 2020-21)Item Sanitary Sewer Water Administration Total Beginning Balance $ 220,001 $ 257,721 $ 5,052 $ 482,774Revenue Interest Income $ 1,127 $ 1,438 $ 0 $ 2,565Development Fees $ 396 $ 13,005 $ 402 $ 13,803Total $ 1,523 $ 14,443 $ 402 $ 16,368 Expenses
Bank Charges ($ 83) $ 0 $ 0 ($ 83)
Construction Project $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
City Enginerring Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Reporting $ 0 $ 0 ($ 259) ($ 259)
Total ($ 83) $ 0 ($ 259) ($ 342)
Ending Balance $ 221,441 $ 272,164 $ 5,196 $ 498,800Source: City of Turlock Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 11 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 12
Remaining Improvements
Table 7 details the remaining NWTSP Fee Program improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the NWTSP Fee Program fees. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2013 NWTSP Fee Nexus Study Update and subsequent AB1600 reports. The remaining costs have been updated to 2021 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI for San Francisco from March 2021 through September 2021.

Table 8 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the existing fund balance. At this time, sufficient funds have not been collected to fund all remaining improvements. For each fee component, additional funding in the amount of the estimated remaining net costs is needed to fully fund all remaining improvements and fee administration. In total, approximately $811,000 in additional funding is needed to fully finance the remaining fee program costs, as summarized by component below:

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sanitary Sewer $ 332,000
Water $ 446,000
Administration $ 33,000
Total $ 811,000
Table 7
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs [1] Less Completed Remaining
Cost
Cost
(2021$)
Cost Adjustment
San Francisco CCI - March 2020 [1] 1,012.13San Francisco CCI - September 2021 1,073.21Cost Increase Factor 1.06 NWTSP-Funded Percentage of Costs 100%
Sanitary Sewer
1 10" Sewer Line in Golden State Blvd from Tuolumne 1800 feet North $ 272,104 $ 0 $ 272,104 $ 288,5262 12" Sewer Line in Golden State Blvd from Tuolumne 1800 feet South $ 249,429 $ 0 $ 249,429 $ 264,482 Subtotal $ 521,533 $ 0 $ 521,533 $ 553,009
Water
1 12" Water line in Golden State from Taylor 400' South $ 60,468 $ 0 $ 60,468 $ 64,117 2 12" Water Line in Taylor Rd from Golden State to Tegner $ 211,637 $ 0 $ 211,637 $ 224,4093 Bore 24" Casing under TID at Tegner $ 45,351 $ 0 $ 45,351 $ 48,088 4 12" Water Line in Tuolumne from Tegner to Countryside $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 5 Bore 24" Casing / Install 12" Line Under SR99 at Tuolumne $ 359,483 $ 0 $ 359,483 $ 381,178 Subtotal $ 676,938 $ 0 $ 676,938 $ 717,792
Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 1,198,471 $ 0 $ 1,198,471 $ 1,270,800 Administration - 3% of Costs [2] $ 38,124
Total NWTSP Area Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 1,308,924Source: City of Turlock Costs (2020$)
[1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, December 2022.
[2] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 13 Table 8
Turlock Annual ReportNWTSP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2021$)Item Source Sanitary Sewer Water Admin. Total Remaining Costs Table 7 $ 553,009 $ 717,792 $ 38,124 $ 1,308,924Less Fund Balance Table 6 ($ 221,441) ($ 272,164) ($ 5,196) ($ 498,800)Net Remaining Costs $ 331,568 $ 445,628 $ 32,928 $ 810,125Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements No No No NoPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2021$)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 14 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 15
Northeast Turlock Master Plan
Fee Program Overview
The developable land in the NETMP Area consists of residential uses only. The NETMP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the NETMP Area. The components of the NETMP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system infrastructure, including sewer line and lift station improvements. All sewer system infrastructure has been completed and funded.
 Storm Drainage: Funds storm drainage lines.
 Transportation: Funds street, traffic signal, and bike and pedestrian paths improvements.
 Water: Funds water infrastructure, including water lines and 50 percent of a non-potable purple water pipe. The remaining 50 percent is funded by a City contribution.
 Administration: Funds administration of the NETMP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedule
Table 9 shows the current fee schedule for the NETMP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. It also shows the Adjusted NETMP fees of $3,000 per dwelling unit that were approved by the Turlock City Council in April of 2020.

Fee Fund Activity
Table 10 shows the NETMP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2020–21.

It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the five components.

Table 9
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Water Admin. Total Residential
Very Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00Medium Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Residential
Very Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Low Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00Medium Density $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
Fee per Dwelling Unit (effective April 1, 2020)
Adjusted Fee per Dwelling Unit to Be Implemented by Individual Developer Agreements (Approved by Turlock City Council - April 2020)
Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 16 Table 10
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Fee Program Summary (FY 2020-21)Item Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Water Administration Total Beginning Balance $ 193,148 $ 1,301,567 $ 1,443,883 $ 550,323 $ 64,894 $ 3,553,816 Revenue
Market Valuation ($ 1,260) ($ 8,500) ($ 9,431) ($ 3,595) ($ 425) ($ 23,211)Interest Income $ 1,029 $ 6,936 $ 7,693 $ 2,933 $ 0 $ 18,591Development Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,000 $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,000 Total ($ 231) ($ 1,564) $ 52,262 ($ 662) ($ 425) $ 49,380 Less Expenses
Bank Charges $ 0 $ 0 ($ 604) $ 0 $ 0 ($ 604)
Contractual Services
City Engineering Services $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 2,647) ($ 2,647) Reporting $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 259) ($ 259)
Special Legal Counsel $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 177) ($ 177)
Fee Nexus Study $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Subtotal $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 3,083) ($ 3,083)
Capital Outlay
Construction Project $ 0 $ 0 ($ 2,274) $ 0 $ 0 ($ 2,274) Transfers Out
Transfers Out To Fd 215 MV & Colorado P0763 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Transfers Out To Fd 502 Engineering Admin $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Subtotal $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Total Expenses $ 0 $ 0 ($ 2,878) $ 0 ($ 3,083) ($ 5,961) Ending Balance $ 192,918 $ 1,300,003 $ 1,493,267 $ 549,661 $ 61,386 $ 3,597,234 Source: City of Turlock
Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 17 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 18
During the fiscal year, revenue was derived from interest income and NETMP Area Transportation development impact fees, and the following expenses were incurred:
 City Engineering Services
 Administrative Reporting.
 Special Legal Counsel
 Bank Charges
 Transportation Construction Project
There were no loans and no refunds made or allocated from the NETMP Fee Program.

After accounting for the amounts owed to various fund components, two of the components (Water and Administration) have remaining costs that are less than zero.

Table 11
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs [1] Less Completed Remaining
Cost
Cost
(2021$)
Cost Adjustment
San Francisco CCI - March 2020 [1] 1,012.13San Francisco CCI - September 2021 1,073.21Cost Increase Factor 1.06 NETMP-Funded Percentage of Costs 100%Sanitary Sewer
Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($57,138) $0 ($57,138) ($ 57,138) Storm Drainage
Line in 1st Road south of Christoffersen off Berkeley Road $130,863 $ 0 $130,863 $ 138,761Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($109,537) $ 0 ($109,537) ($ 109,537)Subtotal $ 21,326 $ 0 $ 21,326 $ 29,224 Transportation
Signal at Taylor Road/Berkeley Avenue $713,743 $ 0 $ 713,743 $ 756,818Christoffersen Parkway - North Olive Avenue to Berkeley Avenue $48,775 $ 0 $ 48,775 $ 51,719Christoffersen Parkway - North Olive Avenue to Berkeley Avenue (Sound Wall) $126,491 $ 0 $ 126,491 $ 134,125Monte Vista Avenue - North Olive Avenue to Berkeley Avenue $0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Colorado Avenue - North of Monte Vista Avenue to Project Line $76,224 $ 0 $ 76,224 $ 80,824Berkeley Avenue Landscape Setback Area Value $24,760 $ 0 $ 24,760 $ 26,254Interior Pedestrian Connection Paths $18,450 $ 0 $ 18,450 $ 19,563Interfund Transfer (Owed to other fee components) $715,225 $ 0 $ 715,225 $ 715,225Subtotal $ 1,723,668 $ 0 $ 1,723,668 $ 1,784,529 Water
East/West Line in 2nd Road South of Christoffersen Parkway, Colorado to Greenbelt $ 183,353 $ 0 $ 183,353 $ 194,418 Purple Pipe $ 191,262 $ 0 $ 191,262 $ 202,805City Contribution to Purple Pipe ($ 95,631) $ 0 ($ 95,631) ($ 101,402)Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($ 500,234) $ 0 ($ 500,234) ($ 500,234)Subtotal ($ 221,251) $ 0 ($ 221,251) ($ 204,414) Administration
Interfund Transfer (Owed from Transportation) ($ 48,315) $ 0 ($ 48,315) ($ 48,315) Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 1,418,290 $ 0 $ 1,418,290 $ 1,503,886 Administration - 3% of Costs [2] $ 45,117
Total NETMP Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 1,549,002Source: City of Turlock Costs (2020$)
[1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, December 2022.
[2] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 19 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 20
Table 12 summarizes the remaining net costs by fee component after accounting for the fee fund balances. All NETMP fee fund components except for the Transportation component have net remaining costs that are less than zero, indicating that, at this time, sufficient funds have been collected to fund remaining all improvements. In total, the NETMP fee fund currently has an estimated $2.0 million of surplus funds, as summarized by component below:

Amount and Timing of Remaining Funding
No remaining funding is necessary, as the City has collected enough NETMP fee revenue to fund the remaining infrastructure costs. In addition to the estimated $2.0 million in current surplus NETMP funds summarized above, future NETMP fees, if collected, would result in a greater surplus. As discussed previously, future NETMP fees have been reduced from approximately $37,000 to $52,000 per dwelling unit (depending on the unit type) to $3,000 per dwelling unit for all dwelling units, and therefore, the amount of potential additional surplus funds would be minimal. NETMP fees are collected at the issuance of building permits for development in the NETMP.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sanitary Sewer ($ 250,000)
Storm Drainage ($ 1,271,000)
Transportation $ 291,000
Water ($ 754,000)
Administration ($ 65,000)
Total ($ 2,049,000)
Table 12
Turlock Annual ReportNETMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2021$)Item Source Sanitary
Sewer
Storm
Drainage Transportation Water Admin. Total
Remaining Costs Table 11 ($ 57,138) $ 29,224 $ 1,784,529 ($ 204,414) ($ 3,199) $ 1,549,002Less Fund Balance Table 10 ($ 192,918) ($ 1,300,003) ($ 1,493,267) ($ 549,661) ($ 61,386) ($ 3,597,234)Net Remaining Costs ($ 250,056) ($ 1,270,779) $ 291,263 ($ 754,075) ($ 64,585) ($ 2,048,232)Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements Yes Yes No Yes Yes YesPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2021$)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 21 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 22
North Turlock Master Plan
Fee Program Overview
The developable land in the NTMP Area consists of residential, office, and public school uses. The NTMP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the NTMP Area. Most of the improvements have already been completed. The components of the NTMP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system infrastructure, including sewer line and lift station improvements.
 Storm Drainage: Funds storm drainage improvements, including storm line, lift station, and storm water storage improvements.
 Transportation: Funds street, traffic signal, and bike and pedestrian paths improvements.
 Administration: Funds administration of the NTMP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedu le
Table 13 shows the current fee schedule for the NTMP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fu nd Activity
Table 14 shows the NTMP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal Year 2020–21. It summarizes the beginning balance, revenues, expenses, and ending balance for each of the four components.

There were no loans and no refunds made or allocated from the NTMP Fee Program.

Table 13
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Admin. Total Residential
Low Density $ 2,907.79 $ 3,751.42 $ 9,306.24 $ 478.96 $ 16,444.41 Medium Density $ 2,907.79 $ 2,362.61 $ 9,306.24 $ 437.29 $ 15,013.93High Density $ 2,907.79 $ 1,763.15 $ 9,306.24 $ 419.32 $ 14,396.50 Nonresidential
Elementary School $ 8,315.64 $ 2,722.07 $ 52,297.82 $ 1,900.09 $ 65,235.62Office $ 16,575.12 $ 38,704.79 $ 196,349.04 $ 7,548.87 $ 259,177.82 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per dwelling unit
per acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 23 Table 14
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Fee Summary (FY 2020-21)Item Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Transportation Administration Total Beginning Balance $ 851,626 $ 479,383 $ 900,985 ($ 5,047) $ 2,226,948Revenue Interest Income $ 4,413 $ 2,509 $ 4,668 $ 0 $ 11,590Market Valuation $ 0 ($ 14,578) $ 0 $ 0 ($ 14,578)Total $ 4,413 ($ 12,069) $ 4,668 $ 0 ($ 2,988) Expenses
Bank Charges $ 0 $ 0 ($ 376) $ 0 ($ 376)
Total $ 0 $ 0 ($ 376) $ 0 ($ 376)
Ending Balance $ 856,039 $ 467,315 $ 905,278 ($ 5,047) $ 2,223,584Source: City of Turlock Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 24 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 25
Remaining Improvements
Table 15 details the remaining improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the NTMP Fee Program revenues. The costs are based on the remaining improvement costs detailed in the 2001 NTMP Fee Nexus Study. Because the majority of the improvements have now been completed, the City recently prepared an updated list of remaining improvements.

The 2001 remaining costs have been updated to 2020 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record CCI for San Francisco from September 2001 through March 2020.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs
Sewer ($ 634,000)
Storm Drainage ($ 261,000)
Transportation ($ 905,000)
Administration $ 18,000
Total ($ 1,782,000)
Table 15
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Fee Program Remaining CostsProject Costs [1] Less
Completed
Remaining
Cost
Cost
(2021$)
Cost Adjustment
San Francisco CCI - March 2020 [1] 1,012.13San Francisco CCI - September 2021 1,073.21Cost Increase Factor 1.06 NTMP-Funded Percentage of Total 100%
Sanitary Sewer
Mt View Systems - Payback for Pitman HS Pump Station $ 101,246 $ 0 $ 101,246 $ 107,356 Kilroy/Walnut Systems - Payback for Pitman HS Pump Station $ 107,996 $ 0 $ 107,996 $ 114,513Subtotal $ 209,241 $ 0 $ 209,241 $ 221,869 Storm Drainage
1st St. N/O Christoffersen Off Mid Storm Line $ 116,822 $ 0 $ 116,822 $ 123,8732nd St. N/O Christoffersen Off Mid Storm Line $ 77,881 $ 0 $ 77,881 $ 82,582Subtotal $ 194,704 $ 0 $ 194,704 $ 206,454 Subtotal Improvement Cost $ 403,945 $ 0 $ 403,945 $ 428,324Administration - 3% of Costs $ 12,118 $ 12,850 Total NWTSP Area Fee Program Remaining Costs $ 416,063 $ 441,173 Source: City of Turlock
Costs (2020$)
[1] Total project costs are the remaining costs from the previous fiscal year. See Turlock Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 prepared for the City of Turlock by EPS, December 2022.
[2] Estimated admin costs are based on a fee program admin percentage applied to estimated remaining costs, but actual administration is equal to 3% of the current fee.

Prepared by EPS 9/1/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 26 Table 16
Turlock Annual ReportNTMP Fee Program Net Remaining Costs (2021$)Item Source Sanitary
Sewer
Storm
Drainage Transportation Administration Total
Remaining Costs Table 15 $ 221,869 $ 206,454 $ 0 $ 12,850 $ 441,173 Less Fund Balance Table 14 ($ 856,039) ($ 467,315) ($ 905,278) $ 5,047 ($ 2,223,584)Net Remaining Costs ($ 634,169) ($ 260,860) ($ 905,278) $ 17,897 ($ 1,782,411)Sufficient Funds Available to Complete Improvements Yes Yes Yes No YesPercentage of Total Improvements Funded by Fee Program 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Cost (2021$)
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 27 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 28
East Tuolumne Master Plan
Fee Program Overview
The developable land in the ETMP Area consists of residential uses only. The ETMP Fee Program was established to charge development impact fees to new development for specific plan infrastructure needed to serve the ETMP Area. The components of the ETMP Fee Program are summarized below:
 Transportation: These improvements include road improvements, irrigation improvements, and underground electrical improvements to roads that border the ETMP area.
 Sanitary Sewer: Funds sewer system infrastructure, including a pump station and series of new sewer mains.
 Water: Funds water infrastructure, including a series of water lines.  Administration: Funds administration of the ETMP Fee Program.

Current Fee Schedule
Table 17 shows the current fee schedule for the ETMP Fee Program. These fees are effective from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.

Fee Fund Activity
Table 18 shows the ETMP Fee Program Fund activity for Fiscal year 2020–21.

Table 19 shows the ETMP Fee Program credit activity Fiscal Year 2020–21.

It summarizes the beginning balance of credits, net any credits used in previous fiscal years, the credits received in Fiscal Year 2020–21, and the remaining balance.

Table 17
Turlock Annual ReportETMP Development Impact Fees (effective October 1, 2022)Land Use Transportation Sanitary Sewer Portable Water Admin. Total Residential
Very Low Density $ 13,541.90 $ 4,143.56 $ 3,755.68 $ 1,072.06 $ 22,513.20 Low Density $ 13,541.90 $ 4,143.56 $ 2,933.55 $ 1,030.95 $ 21,649.96Medium/Low Density $ 13,541.90 $ 3,397.00 $ 1,251.49 $ 909.52 $ 19,099.91Medium Density $ 13,541.90 $ 3,297.04 $ 853.84 $ 884.64 $ 18,577.42High Density $ 9,459.33 $ 2,749.36 $ 1,028.27 $ 661.85 $ 13,898.81 Cost Recovery Fee
073-013-003 $ 64,986.00073-013-003 $ 31,532.00073-016-006 $ 31,532.00073-016-007 $ 18,279.00 Source: City of Turlock
Fee (effective October 1, 2022)
per dwelling unit
per acre
Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 29 Table 18
Turlock Annual ReportETMP Fee Program Fund Summary (FY 2020-21)Item Transportation Sanitary Sewer Storm Drainage Water Administration [1] Total Beginning Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 162,155) ($ 162,155)Revenue Interest Income $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Development Fees $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,927 $ 50,927Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 50,927 $ 50,927 Expenses
Bank Charges $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0Total $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Ending Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 ($ 111,228) ($ 111,228)Source: City of Turlock[1] Staff time was charged for administering the fee program before any fees had been collected.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 30 Table 19
Turlock Annual ReportETMP Fee Program Remaining CreditsFund Component Capital Improvements
(Credits Owed) Credits Received Balance
Capital
Improvements
(Credits Owed)
Credits
Received Balance
Transportation $ 1,200,531 $ 985,386
FY 19/20 $ 11,102 $ 0
FY 20/21 $ 669,201 $ 0
Subtotal Transportation $ 1,200,531 $ 680,303 $ 520,228 $ 985,386 $ 0 $ 985,386 Sanitary Sewer $ 936,382 $ 0
FY 19/20 $ 3,397 $ 0
FY 20/21 $ 204,763 $ 0
Subtotal Sewer $ 936,382 $ 208,160 $ 728,222 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 Water $ 76,676 $ 366,874
FY 19/20 $ 2,405 $ 0
FY 20/21 $ 144,967 $ 0
Subtotal Water [1] $ 76,676 $ 147,372 ($ 70,696) $ 366,874 $ 0 $ 366,874 Total $ 2,213,589 $ 1,035,835 $ 1,177,753 $ 1,352,260 $ 0 $ 1,352,260Source: City of Turlock EMTP Credits
Fairbanks Ranch Les Chateaux
[1] Orginally, Reimbursement was owed to Fairbanks Ranch based on the total Capital Improvements for the Sewer Component of the ETMP Program while both water and transportation components had fees due based on the original fee obligation. Because of the oversizing in Sewer,reimbursements were converted into credit for the fee obligations due in the Water Component for the 2020-21 Fiscal Year.

Prepared by EPS 8/11/2023 Z:\Shared\Projects\SAC\222000\222113 Turlock Annual Reports\Model\222113 m2 FY20-21 31 Turlock Annual Report—Fiscal Year 2020–21
August 2023
Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. (EPS) 32
Remaining Improvements
Table 20 details the remaining ETMP Fee Program improvement and fee administration costs. All improvement costs will be funded by the ETMP Fee Program fees. The costs are based on the remaining costs detailed in the 2019 ETMP Fee Nexus Study Update and subsequent AB1600 reports. The remaining costs have been updated to 2021 dollars using the change in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index (CCI) for San Francisco from March 2020 through September 2021. In total, approximately $1.3 million in improvements remain to be constructed.

Estimated Net Remaining Costs Fairbanks Les Chateaux Fairbanks Les Chateaux Fairbanks Les Chateaux Transportation $ 764,000 $ 1,200,531 $ 985,386 ($ 680,303) $ 0 $ 520,228 $ 985,386 Sewer $ 0 $ 936,382 $ 0 ($ 208,160) $ 0 $ 728,222 $ 0
Water $ 342,000 $ 76,676 $ 366,874 ($ 147,372) $ 0 ($ 70,696) $ 366,874 Administration $ 167,000
Total $ 1,273,000 $ 2,213,589 $ 1,352,260 ($ 1,035,835) $ 0 $ 1,177,753 $ 1,352,260 Credits Owed Credits Used Credits Remaining

Page 1 of 2 ends

Turlock City CouncilDecember 10, 2024

Turlock City Council
December 10, 2024