Agenda packet — Upland City Council, June 9, 2025 (part 24 of 25)

Villa Serena Specific Plan Traffic Analysis

14896-04 TA Report
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Page 3454 of 3744 ends

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 160 318 166 533 73 546 51 512
Future Volume (vph) 160 318 166 533 73 546 51 512
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 74385216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 74385216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)9.6 28.8 9.6 28.8 9.6 28.4 9.6 28.4
Total Split (s)12.0 30.6 10.2 28.8 9.6 29.6 9.6 29.6
Total Split (%)15.0% 38.3% 12.8% 36.0% 12.0% 37.0% 12.0% 37.0% Yellow Time (s)3.6 4.8 3.6 4.8 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)4.6 5.8 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 69.8
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.

3.2-1 Page 3455 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 160 318 56 166 533 42 73 546 116 51 512 198 Future Volume (veh/h) 160 318 56 166 533 42 73 546 116 51 512 198 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 174 346 61 180 579 46 79 593 126 55 557 215 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 325 744 130 379 750 59 246 831 176 256 690 266 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.29 0.29 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 2864 500 1594 3156 250 1594 2755 584 1594 2363 909 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 174 202 205 180 308 317 79 362 357 55 396 376 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1683 1681 1594 1683 1723 1594 1683 1656 1594 1683 1589 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.4 6.7 6.9 5.6 11.4 11.4 2.3 12.7 12.8 1.6 14.5 14.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.4 6.7 6.9 5.6 11.4 11.4 2.3 12.7 12.8 1.6 14.5 14.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.57
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 325 437 436 379 400 410 246 508 500 256 492 464 V/C Ratio(X) 0.54 0.46 0.47 0.47 0.77 0.77 0.32 0.71 0.72 0.21 0.81 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 333 627 626 379 582 595 273 612 602 300 612 578 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.4 20.7 20.8 17.6 23.7 23.7 16.6 20.7 20.7 16.2 21.8 21.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.3 3.8 3.8 0.3 3.1 3.2 0.2 6.4 6.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.7 2.4 2.5 1.8 4.4 4.5 0.7 4.8 4.8 0.5 5.9 5.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.2 21.5 21.6 18.0 27.5 27.5 16.9 23.7 23.9 16.4 28.2 28.8 LnGrp LOS B C C B C C B C C B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 581 805 798 827
Approach Delay, s/veh 20.5 25.4 23.1 27.7
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.8 25.5 10.2 23.1 8.4 24.8 11.7 21.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 24.2 5.6 24.8 5.0 24.2 7.4 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.6 14.8 7.6 8.9 4.3 16.6 7.4 13.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.9 0.0 1.9 0.0 2.8 0.0 2.4 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.5
HCM 6th LOS C

3.2-2 Page 3456 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)43 7 10 14 48 680 6 706
Future Volume (vph)43 7 10 14 48 680 6 706
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 4 85216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44885216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 27.6 27.6 9.6 27.4 9.6 27.4
Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 9.8 32.2 9.6 32.0
Total Split (%)40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 14.0% 46.0% 13.7% 45.7% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 40.6
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.

3.2-3 Page 3457 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 43 7 74 10 14 11 48 680 6 6 706 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 43 7 74 10 14 11 48 680 6 6 706 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 8 81 11 15 12 53 747 7 7 776 34 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 415 28 279 359 183 146 367 1388 13 348 1182 52 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.41 0.41 0.01 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1238 136 1381 1166 905 724 1594 3417 32 1594 3285 144 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 89 11 0 27 53 368 386 7 398 412 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1238 0 1517 1166 0 1630 1594 1683 1766 1594 1683 1746 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.3 0.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 0.5 0.8 6.6 6.6 0.1 7.9 7.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.8 0.0 2.0 2.3 0.0 0.5 0.8 6.6 6.6 0.1 7.9 7.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 415 0 307 359 0 329 367 684 717 348 606 628 V/C Ratio(X) 0.11 0.00 0.29 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.14 0.54 0.54 0.02 0.66 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 881 0 878 816 0 968 487 1135 1191 534 1127 1169 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.6 0.0 13.4 14.4 0.0 12.9 7.9 9.0 9.0 8.2 10.7 10.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.0 1.2 1.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 1.6 1.7 0.0 2.1 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.7 0.0 14.0 14.4 0.0 13.0 7.9 9.6 9.6 8.2 11.9 11.8 LnGrp LOS BABBABAAAABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 136 38 807 817
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.9 13.4 9.5 11.8
Approach LOS BBAB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.0 21.5 13.2 6.8 19.7 13.2
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.6 5.4 * 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.8 23.0 5.2 26.6 * 24 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 8.6 4.0 2.8 9.9 4.3
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.1 0.5 0.0 4.4 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.0
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

3.2-4 Page 3458 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Existing (2022) - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)34 49 32 108 34 493 146 588
Future Volume (vph)34 49 32 108 34 493 146 588
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44882266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
Total Split (%)47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 41.1
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.

3.2-5 Page 3459 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Existing (2022) - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 34 49 27 32 108 201 34 493 40 146 588 51 Future Volume (veh/h) 34 49 27 32 108 201 34 493 40 146 588 51 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 38 54 24 36 120 190 38 548 40 162 653 55 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 272 313 139 461 165 262 394 1459 106 440 1439 121 Arrive On Green 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 Sat Flow, veh/h 957 1161 516 1180 612 969 662 3181 232 740 3136 264 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 38 0 78 36 0 310 38 290 298 162 350 358 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 957 0 1678 1180 0 1582 662 1683 1729 740 1683 1717 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 1.4 0.9 0.0 7.0 1.6 4.4 4.4 7.2 5.6 5.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.4 0.0 1.4 2.3 0.0 7.0 7.2 4.4 4.4 11.6 5.6 5.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.15
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 272 0 453 461 0 427 394 772 793 440 772 788 V/C Ratio(X) 0.14 0.00 0.17 0.08 0.00 0.73 0.10 0.37 0.38 0.37 0.45 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 577 0 987 837 0 931 537 1137 1168 600 1137 1160 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 16.8 0.0 10.9 11.8 0.0 13.0 9.7 6.9 6.9 10.7 7.2 7.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.3 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 2.3 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.2 1.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.0 0.0 11.1 11.9 0.0 15.3 9.8 7.2 7.2 11.2 7.6 7.6 LnGrp LOS BABBABAAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 116 346 626 870
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.0 15.0 7.4 8.3
Approach LOS BBAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.3 15.7 23.3 15.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.4 23.0 26.4 23.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.2 10.4 13.6 9.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.4 0.4 4.3 1.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.5
HCM 6th LOS A

3.2-6 Page 3460 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 190 944 99 326 68 627 134 453
Future Volume (vph) 190 944 99 326 68 627 134 453
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 74385216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 74385216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)9.6 28.8 9.6 28.8 9.6 28.4 9.6 28.4
Total Split (s)11.6 31.8 9.8 30.0 9.6 28.8 9.6 28.8
Total Split (%)14.5% 39.8% 12.3% 37.5% 12.0% 36.0% 12.0% 36.0% Yellow Time (s)3.6 4.8 3.6 4.8 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)4.6 5.8 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 77.3
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.

3.2-7 Page 3461 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 190 944 82 99 326 71 68 627 274 134 453 171 Future Volume (veh/h) 190 944 82 99 326 71 68 627 274 134 453 171 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 194 963 84 101 333 72 69 640 280 137 462 174 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 407 1020 89 200 826 176 268 666 291 199 735 274 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.31 0.31 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 3129 273 1594 2760 589 1594 2267 991 1594 2388 892 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 194 518 529 101 201 204 69 475 445 137 324 312 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1683 1718 1594 1683 1666 1594 1683 1575 1594 1683 1597 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.8 23.9 23.9 3.4 7.6 7.8 2.4 22.1 22.1 4.8 13.2 13.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.8 23.9 23.9 3.4 7.6 7.8 2.4 22.1 22.1 4.8 13.2 13.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.16 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.56
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 407 549 560 200 504 498 268 495 463 199 518 491 V/C Ratio(X) 0.48 0.94 0.94 0.50 0.40 0.41 0.26 0.96 0.96 0.69 0.63 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 407 550 561 207 512 506 290 495 463 199 518 491 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.5 26.1 26.1 20.8 22.2 22.3 19.0 27.7 27.7 21.4 23.6 23.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 25.2 24.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.2 30.6 31.9 8.0 2.4 2.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.2 12.3 12.5 1.2 2.8 2.8 0.8 12.3 11.7 2.1 5.2 5.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.8 51.3 51.0 21.6 22.7 22.8 19.2 58.2 59.6 29.4 26.0 26.4 LnGrp LOS B DDCCCBEECCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 1241 506 989 773
Approach Delay, s/veh 46.0 22.5 56.1 26.8
Approach LOS D C E C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.6 28.8 9.5 31.8 8.5 29.9 11.6 29.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 23.4 5.2 26.0 5.0 23.4 7.0 24.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.8 24.1 5.4 25.9 4.4 15.4 8.8 9.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 2.3 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.2
HCM 6th LOS D

3.2-8 Page 3462 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 121 6 1 0 25 838 6 609
Future Volume (vph) 121 6 1 0 25 838 6 609
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 4 85216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44885216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 27.6 27.6 9.6 27.4 9.6 27.4
Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 9.6 32.2 9.6 32.2
Total Split (%)40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 13.7% 46.0% 13.7% 46.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 39.8
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.

3.2-9 Page 3463 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Existing (2022) - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 121 6 43 1 0 4 25 838 4 6 609 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 121 6 43 1 0 4 25 838 4 6 609 31
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 126 6 45 1 0 4 26 873 4 6 634 32
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 461 39 295 418 0 333 375 1316 6 294 1173 59
Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.03 0.38 0.38 0.01 0.36 0.36 Sat Flow, veh/h 1264 177 1329 1208 0 1502 1594 3437 16 1594 3261 164 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 126 0 51 1 0 4 26 428 449 6 327 339 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1264 0 1506 1208 0 1502 1594 1683 1769 1594 1683 1742 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 8.2 8.2 0.1 6.1 6.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 3.5 0.0 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 8.2 8.2 0.1 6.1 6.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 461 0 334 418 0 333 375 645 677 294 605 627 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.07 0.66 0.66 0.02 0.54 0.54 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 921 0 882 877 0 903 528 1149 1208 484 1149 1189 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 13.3 0.0 12.3 12.7 0.0 11.9 7.9 10.0 10.0 8.6 10.0 10.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 1.1 0.0 0.8 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.2 2.3 0.0 1.6 1.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 13.6 0.0 12.5 12.7 0.0 11.9 7.9 11.2 11.1 8.6 10.7 10.7 LnGrp LOS BABBABABBABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 177 5 903 672
Approach Delay, s/veh 13.3 12.1 11.1 10.7
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.9 20.4 13.9 5.8 19.5 13.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.6 5.4 * 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.8 23.0 5.0 26.8 * 24 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 10.2 5.5 2.4 8.1 3.1
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.8 0.6 0.0 3.6 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.2
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

3.2-10 Page 3464 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Existing (2022) - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)51 90 24 66 18 687 119 502
Future Volume (vph)51 90 24 66 18 687 119 502
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44882266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
Total Split (%)47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 37.3
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.

3.2-11 Page 3465 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Existing (2022) - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report
Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 51 90 28 24 66 142 18 687 49 119 502 29 Future Volume (veh/h) 51 90 28 24 66 142 18 687 49 119 502 29 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 54 96 25 26 70 119 19 731 48 127 534 29 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 340 323 84 399 141 240 476 1524 100 392 1546 84 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 1069 1350 352 1136 589 1002 758 3202 210 620 3247 176 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 54 0 121 26 0 189 19 384 395 127 276 287 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1069 0 1702 1136 0 1592 758 1683 1729 620 1683 1740 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 0.0 2.2 0.7 0.0 3.8 0.6 5.8 5.8 6.5 3.8 3.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.5 0.0 2.2 2.9 0.0 3.8 4.4 5.8 5.8 12.3 3.8 3.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.21 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.10
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 340 0 408 399 0 381 476 801 823 392 801 828 V/C Ratio(X) 0.16 0.00 0.30 0.07 0.00 0.50 0.04 0.48 0.48 0.32 0.34 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 744 0 1051 829 0 983 652 1193 1225 537 1193 1234 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.6 0.0 11.6 12.8 0.0 12.2 7.5 6.6 6.6 10.8 6.1 6.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.2 0.0 1.2 0.1 1.1 1.2 0.6 0.7 0.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.8 0.0 12.0 12.8 0.0 13.2 7.6 7.1 7.1 11.3 6.4 6.4 LnGrp LOS BABBABAAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 175 215 798 690
Approach Delay, s/veh 12.9 13.2 7.1 7.3
Approach LOS BBAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.1 14.1 23.1 14.1
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.4 23.0 26.4 23.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.8 7.5 14.3 5.8
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 4.5 0.7 3.4 1.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.4
HCM 6th LOS A

3.2-12 Page 3466 of 3744

Villa Serena Specific Plan Traffic Analysis

14896-04 TA Report
APPENDIX 5.1: OPENING YEAR CUMULATIVE (2025) WITHOUT PROJECT

CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 3467 of 3744 ends

Villa Serena Specific Plan Traffic Analysis

14896-04 TA Report
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Page 3468 of 3744 ends

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 170 337 185 566 85 596 54 565
Future Volume (vph) 170 337 185 566 85 596 54 565
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 74385216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 74385216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)9.6 28.8 9.6 28.8 9.6 28.4 9.6 28.4
Total Split (s)12.0 29.2 11.6 28.8 9.6 29.6 9.6 29.6
Total Split (%)15.0% 36.5% 14.5% 36.0% 12.0% 37.0% 12.0% 37.0% Yellow Time (s)3.6 4.8 3.6 4.8 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)4.6 5.8 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 72.2
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.

5.1-1 Page 3469 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 170 337 68 185 566 45 85 596 131 54 565 210 Future Volume (veh/h) 170 337 68 185 566 45 85 596 131 54 565 210 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 185 366 74 201 615 49 92 648 142 59 614 228 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 311 699 140 375 771 61 232 857 188 241 723 268 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 2794 559 1594 3155 251 1594 2737 599 1594 2390 887 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 185 219 221 201 328 336 92 398 392 59 432 410 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1683 1670 1594 1683 1723 1594 1683 1653 1594 1683 1594 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.0 7.9 8.1 6.7 12.9 12.9 2.8 15.0 15.1 1.8 17.0 17.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.0 7.9 8.1 6.7 12.9 12.9 2.8 15.0 15.1 1.8 17.0 17.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.56
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 311 421 418 375 411 421 232 527 518 241 509 482 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.80 0.80 0.40 0.76 0.76 0.25 0.85 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 311 558 554 375 549 561 251 577 567 276 577 546 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.5 22.8 22.9 17.9 25.0 25.0 17.7 21.8 21.8 17.0 23.1 23.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 5.9 5.9 0.4 5.2 5.3 0.2 10.4 11.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 2.9 3.0 2.2 5.3 5.4 0.9 6.0 6.0 0.6 7.5 7.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.6 23.8 23.9 18.8 31.0 31.0 18.1 27.0 27.2 17.2 33.5 34.2 LnGrp LOS C C C B C C B C C B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 625 865 882 901
Approach Delay, s/veh 22.9 28.1 26.1 32.7
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.0 27.5 11.6 23.4 8.8 26.8 12.0 23.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 24.2 7.0 23.4 5.0 24.2 7.4 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 17.1 8.7 10.1 4.8 19.0 8.0 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.7 0.0 1.9 0.0 2.3 0.0 2.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.9
HCM 6th LOS C

5.1-2 Page 3470 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)46 7 11 15 59 756 6 789
Future Volume (vph)46 7 11 15 59 756 6 789
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 4 85216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44885216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 27.6 27.6 9.6 27.4 9.6 27.4
Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 10.0 32.2 9.6 31.8
Total Split (%)40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 14.3% 46.0% 13.7% 45.4% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 45.1
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.

5.1-3 Page 3471 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 7 88 11 15 12 59 756 6 6 789 33 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 7 88 11 15 12 59 756 6 6 789 33 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 51 8 97 12 16 13 65 831 7 7 867 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 401 23 284 333 182 148 355 1481 12 330 1250 52 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.01 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1236 115 1398 1150 898 730 1594 3421 29 1594 3293 137 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 51 0 105 12 0 29 65 409 429 7 443 460 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1236 0 1514 1150 0 1628 1594 1683 1767 1594 1683 1747 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 2.5 0.4 0.0 0.6 1.0 7.8 7.8 0.1 9.5 9.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 2.5 2.9 0.0 0.6 1.0 7.8 7.8 0.1 9.5 9.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 401 0 307 333 0 331 355 729 765 330 639 663 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.34 0.04 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.56 0.56 0.02 0.69 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 813 0 812 733 0 897 456 1053 1105 501 1037 1076 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.7 0.0 14.6 15.9 0.0 13.9 8.1 9.1 9.1 8.4 11.2 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.6 0.0 1.4 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.1 0.0 2.7 2.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.9 0.0 15.3 15.9 0.0 14.0 8.2 9.8 9.7 8.4 12.6 12.5 LnGrp LOS BABBABAAAABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 156 41 903 910
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.1 14.5 9.7 12.5
Approach LOS BBAB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.0 24.0 13.9 7.3 21.7 13.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.6 5.4 * 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.8 23.0 5.4 26.4 * 24 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 9.8 4.5 3.0 11.5 4.9
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.6 0.0 4.7 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

5.1-4 Page 3472 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)36 52 34 115 44 565 155 673
Future Volume (vph)36 52 34 115 44 565 155 673
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44882266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
Total Split (%)47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 44.5
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.

5.1-5 Page 3473 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 36 52 38 34 115 213 44 565 42 155 673 54 Future Volume (veh/h) 36 52 38 34 115 213 44 565 42 155 673 54 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 58 36 38 128 204 49 628 43 172 748 58 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 243 283 176 435 169 270 358 1540 105 407 1523 118 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 938 1022 634 1163 610 972 604 3196 219 685 3159 245 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 0 94 38 0 332 49 330 341 172 398 408 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 938 0 1656 1163 0 1581 604 1683 1731 685 1683 1721 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 0.0 1.9 1.1 0.0 8.5 2.6 5.6 5.6 9.5 7.1 7.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.3 0.0 1.9 3.1 0.0 8.5 9.7 5.6 5.6 15.1 7.1 7.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.14
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 243 0 459 435 0 439 358 811 835 407 811 829 V/C Ratio(X) 0.16 0.00 0.20 0.09 0.00 0.76 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.42 0.49 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 473 0 865 720 0 826 429 1009 1038 487 1009 1031 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 19.2 0.0 12.2 13.4 0.0 14.6 11.0 7.4 7.4 12.2 7.7 7.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.7 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 2.9 0.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.7 1.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.6 0.0 12.4 13.4 0.0 17.3 11.2 7.7 7.7 12.9 8.2 8.2 LnGrp LOS BABBABBAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 134 370 720 978
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 16.9 7.9 9.0
Approach LOS BBAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.6 17.4 26.6 17.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.4 23.0 26.4 23.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.7 12.3 17.1 10.5
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.8 0.4 4.1 1.9
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.3
HCM 6th LOS B

5.1-6 Page 3474 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 202 1002 120 346 86 697 142 514
Future Volume (vph) 202 1002 120 346 86 697 142 514
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 74385216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 74385216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)9.6 28.8 9.6 28.8 9.6 28.4 9.6 28.4
Total Split (s)15.8 36.0 10.0 30.2 9.7 33.2 10.8 34.3
Total Split (%)17.6% 40.0% 11.1% 33.6% 10.8% 36.9% 12.0% 38.1% Yellow Time (s)3.6 4.8 3.6 4.8 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)4.6 5.8 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.

5.1-7 Page 3475 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 202 1002 102 120 346 75 86 697 305 142 514 181 Future Volume (veh/h) 202 1002 102 120 346 75 86 697 305 142 514 181 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 206 1022 104 122 353 77 88 711 311 145 524 185 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 408 1034 105 178 790 170 256 700 306 190 790 278 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 3080 313 1594 2754 594 1594 2267 991 1594 2433 855 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 206 558 568 122 214 216 88 528 494 145 362 347 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1683 1710 1594 1683 1665 1594 1683 1575 1594 1683 1604 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 29.7 29.7 4.9 9.4 9.6 3.4 27.8 27.8 5.6 16.6 16.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 29.7 29.7 4.9 9.4 9.6 3.4 27.8 27.8 5.6 16.6 16.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.53
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 408 565 574 178 483 477 256 520 486 190 547 521 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.99 0.99 0.69 0.44 0.45 0.34 1.02 1.02 0.76 0.66 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 433 565 574 178 483 477 262 520 486 190 547 521 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.6 29.7 29.7 24.5 26.2 26.3 20.9 31.1 31.1 23.5 26.1 26.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 34.8 34.7 8.7 0.6 0.7 0.3 43.4 44.8 15.2 3.0 3.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 16.3 16.6 2.1 3.6 3.6 1.2 16.7 15.9 2.7 6.7 6.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.0 64.5 64.4 33.2 26.9 27.0 21.2 74.5 75.9 38.7 29.1 29.4 LnGrp LOS B E E CCCCFFDCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 1332 552 1110 854
Approach Delay, s/veh 57.4 28.3 70.9 30.8
Approach LOS E C E C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 33.2 10.0 36.0 9.4 34.6 14.4 31.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.2 27.8 5.4 30.2 5.1 28.9 11.2 24.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 29.8 6.9 31.7 5.4 18.8 9.8 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 51.2
HCM 6th LOS D

5.1-8 Page 3476 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 128 6 1 0 41 949 6 709
Future Volume (vph) 128 6 1 0 41 949 6 709
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 4 85216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44885216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 27.6 27.6 9.6 27.4 9.6 27.4
Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 9.6 32.2 9.6 32.2
Total Split (%)40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 13.7% 46.0% 13.7% 46.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 43
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.

5.1-9 Page 3477 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 128 6 61 1 0 4 41 949 4 6 709 33 Future Volume (veh/h) 128 6 61 1 0 4 41 949 4 6 709 33
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 133 6 64 1 0 4 43 989 4 6 739 34
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 446 28 301 387 0 330 364 1413 6 272 1219 56
Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.01 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1264 128 1369 1188 0 1502 1594 3439 14 1594 3277 151 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 133 0 70 1 0 4 43 484 509 6 379 394 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1264 0 1497 1188 0 1502 1594 1683 1769 1594 1683 1745 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 10.0 10.0 0.1 7.7 7.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.0 0.1 0.7 10.0 10.0 0.1 7.7 7.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 446 0 329 387 0 330 364 691 727 272 626 649 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.70 0.70 0.02 0.61 0.61 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 860 0 819 793 0 843 479 1073 1128 449 1073 1112 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.4 0.0 13.4 14.1 0.0 12.8 8.1 10.2 10.2 9.0 10.7 10.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3 1.2 0.0 1.0 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.6 2.8 0.0 2.1 2.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.8 0.0 13.7 14.1 0.0 12.9 8.1 11.5 11.5 9.0 11.7 11.6 LnGrp LOS BABBABABBABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 203 5 1036 779
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.4 13.1 11.4 11.6
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.9 22.7 14.4 6.6 21.0 14.4
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.6 5.4 * 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.8 23.0 5.0 26.8 * 24 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 12.0 6.0 2.7 9.7 3.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.3 0.7 0.0 4.2 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

5.1-10 Page 3478 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)54 96 25 70 33 803 126 611
Future Volume (vph)54 96 25 70 33 803 126 611
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44882266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
Total Split (%)47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 42.5
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.

5.1-11 Page 3479 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) Without Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 54 96 45 25 70 151 33 803 52 126 611 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 54 96 45 25 70 151 33 803 52 126 611 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 57 102 43 27 74 129 35 854 51 134 650 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 293 265 112 344 131 228 445 1665 99 364 1690 81 Arrive On Green 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 Sat Flow, veh/h 1055 1177 496 1111 580 1010 679 3223 192 551 3271 156 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 145 27 0 203 35 446 459 134 334 347 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1055 0 1673 1111 0 1590 679 1683 1732 551 1683 1744 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 3.0 0.9 0.0 4.7 1.3 7.2 7.2 8.7 4.9 4.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.7 0.0 3.0 3.9 0.0 4.7 6.3 7.2 7.2 15.9 4.9 4.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 293 0 377 344 0 359 445 870 895 364 870 901 V/C Ratio(X) 0.19 0.00 0.38 0.08 0.00 0.57 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.37 0.38 0.38 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 645 0 936 715 0 889 530 1080 1112 433 1080 1119 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.1 0.0 13.5 15.2 0.0 14.1 7.9 6.5 6.5 11.7 6.0 6.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 1.6 0.1 1.4 1.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 17.5 0.0 14.1 15.3 0.0 15.5 8.0 7.0 7.0 12.4 6.3 6.3 LnGrp LOS BABBABAAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 202 230 940 815
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.1 15.5 7.0 7.3
Approach LOS BBAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 26.7 14.5 26.7 14.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.4 23.0 26.4 23.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.2 8.7 17.9 6.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.4 0.8 3.4 1.2
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 8.8
HCM 6th LOS A

5.1-12 Page 3480 of 3744

Villa Serena Specific Plan Traffic Analysis

14896-04 TA Report
APPENDIX 5.2: OPENING YEAR CUMULATIVE (2025) WITH PROJECT

CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS

Page 3481 of 3744 ends

Villa Serena Specific Plan Traffic Analysis

14896-04 TA Report
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Page 3482 of 3744 ends

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 170 337 186 566 87 606 54 569
Future Volume (vph) 170 337 186 566 87 606 54 569
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 74385216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 74385216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)9.6 28.8 9.6 28.8 9.6 28.4 9.6 28.4
Total Split (s)12.0 29.2 11.6 28.8 9.6 29.6 9.6 29.6
Total Split (%)15.0% 36.5% 14.5% 36.0% 12.0% 37.0% 12.0% 37.0% Yellow Time (s)3.6 4.8 3.6 4.8 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)4.6 5.8 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 80
Actuated Cycle Length: 72.3
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.

5.2-1 Page 3483 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 170 337 69 186 566 45 87 606 134 54 569 210 Future Volume (veh/h) 170 337 69 186 566 45 87 606 134 54 569 210 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 185 366 75 202 615 49 95 659 146 59 618 228 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 310 696 141 374 770 61 232 859 190 237 726 268 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.25 0.25 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.05 0.30 0.30 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 2787 565 1594 3155 251 1594 2731 604 1594 2395 883 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 185 220 221 202 328 336 95 406 399 59 434 412 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1683 1669 1594 1683 1723 1594 1683 1652 1594 1683 1594 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.1 8.0 8.1 6.7 12.9 13.0 2.9 15.4 15.5 1.8 17.1 17.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.1 8.0 8.1 6.7 12.9 13.0 2.9 15.4 15.5 1.8 17.1 17.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.34 1.00 0.15 1.00 0.37 1.00 0.55
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 310 421 417 374 411 421 232 529 519 237 510 483 V/C Ratio(X) 0.60 0.52 0.53 0.54 0.80 0.80 0.41 0.77 0.77 0.25 0.85 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 310 557 552 374 547 560 250 576 565 272 576 545 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.6 22.9 23.0 18.0 25.1 25.1 17.8 21.9 21.9 17.1 23.1 23.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.2 1.0 1.1 0.9 6.0 6.0 0.4 5.7 5.9 0.2 10.7 11.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 2.9 3.0 2.2 5.3 5.4 1.0 6.3 6.2 0.6 7.6 7.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.8 23.9 24.0 18.9 31.1 31.1 18.2 27.6 27.8 17.3 33.8 34.5 LnGrp LOS C C C B C C B C C B C C
Approach Vol, veh/h 626 866 900 905
Approach Delay, s/veh 23.0 28.2 26.7 33.0
Approach LOS CCCC
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.0 27.6 11.6 23.5 8.8 26.8 12.0 23.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 24.2 7.0 23.4 5.0 24.2 7.4 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 17.5 8.7 10.1 4.9 19.2 8.1 15.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 2.6 0.0 1.9 0.0 2.2 0.0 2.3 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.1
HCM 6th LOS C

5.2-2 Page 3484 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)46 7 11 15 61 771 6 794
Future Volume (vph)46 7 11 15 61 771 6 794
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 4 85216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44885216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 27.6 27.6 9.6 27.4 9.6 27.4
Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 10.0 32.2 9.6 31.8
Total Split (%)40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 14.3% 46.0% 13.7% 45.4% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 45.3
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.

5.2-3 Page 3485 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 46 7 89 11 15 12 61 771 6 6 794 33 Future Volume (veh/h) 46 7 89 11 15 12 61 771 6 6 794 33 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 51 8 98 12 16 13 67 847 7 7 873 36 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 400 23 284 331 182 148 355 1489 12 326 1254 52 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.01 0.38 0.38 Sat Flow, veh/h 1236 114 1399 1149 898 730 1594 3422 28 1594 3295 136 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 51 0 106 12 0 29 67 417 437 7 446 463 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1236 0 1514 1149 0 1628 1594 1683 1767 1594 1683 1747 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.5 0.0 2.6 0.4 0.0 0.6 1.1 8.0 8.0 0.1 9.6 9.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.1 0.0 2.6 3.0 0.0 0.6 1.1 8.0 8.0 0.1 9.6 9.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.45 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 400 0 307 331 0 330 355 733 769 326 641 665 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.35 0.04 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.57 0.57 0.02 0.70 0.70 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 809 0 808 727 0 892 453 1047 1099 496 1031 1070 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.8 0.0 14.7 16.0 0.0 13.9 8.2 9.1 9.1 8.4 11.2 11.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.0 1.4 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.8 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 2.0 2.1 0.0 2.7 2.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.9 0.0 15.4 16.0 0.0 14.1 8.3 9.8 9.8 8.4 12.6 12.6 LnGrp LOS BABBABAAAABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 157 41 921 916
Approach Delay, s/veh 15.2 14.6 9.7 12.6
Approach LOS BBAB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 5.0 24.2 13.9 7.4 21.8 13.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.6 5.4 * 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.8 23.0 5.4 26.4 * 24 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 10.0 4.6 3.1 11.6 5.0
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.7 0.7 0.0 4.8 0.1
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.5
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

5.2-4 Page 3486 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)36 54 41 120 44 565 161 673
Future Volume (vph)36 54 41 120 44 565 161 673
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44882266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
Total Split (%)47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 45.4
Natural Cycle: 60
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.

5.2-5 Page 3487 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 36 54 38 41 120 230 44 565 44 161 673 54 Future Volume (veh/h) 36 54 38 41 120 230 44 565 44 161 673 54 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 40 60 36 46 133 223 49 628 45 179 748 58 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 233 301 181 442 171 288 348 1530 110 396 1517 118 Arrive On Green 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 Sat Flow, veh/h 917 1037 622 1161 590 988 604 3185 228 684 3159 245 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 40 0 96 46 0 356 49 332 341 179 398 408 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 917 0 1658 1161 0 1578 604 1683 1730 684 1683 1721 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 0.0 2.0 1.4 0.0 9.6 2.8 5.9 5.9 10.6 7.5 7.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.5 0.0 2.0 3.5 0.0 9.6 10.3 5.9 5.9 16.6 7.5 7.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.14
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 233 0 482 442 0 459 348 809 831 396 809 827 V/C Ratio(X) 0.17 0.00 0.20 0.10 0.00 0.78 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 421 0 823 681 0 783 402 959 986 458 959 980 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 20.3 0.0 12.4 13.7 0.0 15.0 11.7 7.8 7.8 13.2 8.2 8.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 2.8 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.5 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.0 3.3 0.3 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.8 1.9 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 20.7 0.0 12.6 13.8 0.0 17.9 11.9 8.1 8.1 14.0 8.7 8.7 LnGrp LOS C ABBABBAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 136 402 722 985
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.9 17.4 8.4 9.6
Approach LOS BBAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 27.7 18.7 27.7 18.7
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.4 23.0 26.4 23.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 13.5 18.6 11.6
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 3.7 0.4 3.7 2.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.9
HCM 6th LOS B

5.2-6 Page 3488 of 3744

HCM 6th TWSC Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
5: 15th St. & Coyote Run Dr. East 04/23/2024
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.3
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 2 6 0 5 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 2 6 0 5 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 2 7 0 5 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 9 7
Stage 1 - - - - 7 -
Stage 2 - - - - 2 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 1011 1075
Stage 1 0 - - 0 1016 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 1021 -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 1011 1075
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 1011 -
Stage 1 - - - - 1016 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1021 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 8.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 1011
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.005
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 8.6
HCM Lane LOS - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0

5.2-7 Page 3489 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 202 1002 124 346 87 704 142 525
Future Volume (vph) 202 1002 124 346 87 704 142 525
Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 74385216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 74385216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)9.6 28.8 9.6 28.8 9.6 28.4 9.6 28.4
Total Split (s)15.8 36.0 10.0 30.2 9.7 33.2 10.8 34.3
Total Split (%)17.6% 40.0% 11.1% 33.6% 10.8% 36.9% 12.0% 38.1% Yellow Time (s)3.6 4.8 3.6 4.8 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)4.6 5.8 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 90
Actuated Cycle Length: 90
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.

5.2-8 Page 3490 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 1: Campus Av. & 16th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 202 1002 104 124 346 75 87 704 307 142 525 181 Future Volume (veh/h) 202 1002 104 124 346 75 87 704 307 142 525 181 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 206 1022 106 127 353 77 89 718 313 145 536 185 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 408 1031 107 178 790 170 253 701 306 190 794 273 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.32 0.32 Sat Flow, veh/h 1594 3074 319 1594 2754 594 1594 2270 989 1594 2449 842 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 206 559 569 127 214 216 89 532 499 145 368 353 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1594 1683 1709 1594 1683 1665 1594 1683 1575 1594 1683 1607 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 29.8 29.8 5.1 9.4 9.6 3.4 27.8 27.8 5.6 17.0 17.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 29.8 29.8 5.1 9.4 9.6 3.4 27.8 27.8 5.6 17.0 17.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.19 1.00 0.36 1.00 0.63 1.00 0.52
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 408 565 574 178 483 477 253 520 487 190 546 521 V/C Ratio(X) 0.50 0.99 0.99 0.72 0.44 0.45 0.35 1.02 1.02 0.76 0.67 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 433 565 574 178 483 477 258 520 487 190 546 521 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.6 29.8 29.8 24.6 26.2 26.3 21.0 31.1 31.1 23.5 26.3 26.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 35.3 35.3 11.1 0.6 0.7 0.3 45.7 47.2 15.2 3.3 3.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.7 16.5 16.7 2.3 3.6 3.6 1.2 17.1 16.2 2.7 6.9 6.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.0 65.1 65.0 35.7 26.9 27.0 21.3 76.8 78.3 38.7 29.5 29.8 LnGrp LOS B E E DCCCFFDCC
Approach Vol, veh/h 1334 557 1120 866
Approach Delay, s/veh 57.9 28.9 73.1 31.2
Approach LOS E C E C
Timer - Assigned Phs 12345678
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 33.2 10.0 36.0 9.4 34.6 14.4 31.6 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.8 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.2 27.8 5.4 30.2 5.1 28.9 11.2 24.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.6 29.8 7.1 31.8 5.4 19.1 9.8 11.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 1.8 Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 52.2
HCM 6th LOS D

5.2-9 Page 3491 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 3
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 128 6 1 0 42 959 6 726
Future Volume (vph) 128 6 1 0 42 959 6 726
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA
Protected Phases 4 85216
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44885216
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 5.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 27.6 27.6 9.6 27.4 9.6 27.4
Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 9.6 32.2 9.6 32.2
Total Split (%)40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 40.3% 13.7% 46.0% 13.7% 46.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.4 3.6 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 5.4 4.6 5.4
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?Yes Yes Yes Yes
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 70
Actuated Cycle Length: 43.6
Natural Cycle: 70
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.

5.2-10 Page 3492 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 2: Campus Av. & 15th St.10/05/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 4
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 128 6 63 1 0 4 42 959 4 6 726 33 Future Volume (veh/h) 128 6 63 1 0 4 42 959 4 6 726 33
Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 133 6 66 1 0 4 44 999 4 6 756 34
Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 445 27 301 383 0 329 360 1421 6 270 1225 55
Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.05 0.41 0.41 0.01 0.37 0.37 Sat Flow, veh/h 1264 125 1372 1186 0 1502 1594 3439 14 1594 3281 148 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 133 0 72 1 0 4 44 489 514 6 388 402 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1264 0 1497 1186 0 1502 1594 1683 1769 1594 1683 1745 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.9 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.7 10.2 10.2 0.1 7.9 7.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.0 0.0 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.1 0.7 10.2 10.2 0.1 7.9 7.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 1.00 0.08
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 445 0 328 383 0 329 360 695 731 270 629 652 V/C Ratio(X) 0.30 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.12 0.70 0.70 0.02 0.62 0.62 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 855 0 814 786 0 839 473 1067 1122 446 1067 1107 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 14.5 0.0 13.5 14.2 0.0 12.9 8.1 10.3 10.3 9.0 10.8 10.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3 1.2 0.0 1.0 1.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 2.7 2.8 0.0 2.2 2.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 14.8 0.0 13.9 14.2 0.0 12.9 8.1 11.6 11.5 9.0 11.8 11.7 LnGrp LOS BABBABABBABB
Approach Vol, veh/h 205 5 1047 796
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.5 13.2 11.4 11.7
Approach LOS BBBB
Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 4.9 22.9 14.5 6.6 21.2 14.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.6 5.4 5.2 4.6 5.4 * 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.0 26.8 23.0 5.0 26.8 * 24 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 2.1 12.2 6.0 2.7 9.9 3.7
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 5.3 0.7 0.0 4.3 0.0
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.8
HCM 6th LOS B
Notes
* HCM 6th computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier.

5.2-11 Page 3493 of 3744

Timings Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 5
Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph)54 102 30 73 33 803 145 611
Future Volume (vph)54 102 30 73 33 803 145 611
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA
Protected Phases 4826
Permitted Phases 4826
Detector Phase 44882266
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Minimum Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.4 Total Split (s)28.2 28.2 28.2 28.2 31.8 31.8 31.8 31.8
Total Split (%)47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 47.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% Yellow Time (s)4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
All-Red Time (s)1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Lost Time (s)5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4
Lead/Lag
Lead-Lag Optimize?
Recall Mode None None None None None None None None
Intersection Summary
Cycle Length: 60
Actuated Cycle Length: 48.7
Natural Cycle: 65
Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated
Splits and Phases: 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.

5.2-12 Page 3494 of 3744

HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896) 3: Campus Av. & 14th St.10/04/2022
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 54 102 45 30 73 163 33 803 60 145 611 31 Future Volume (veh/h) 54 102 45 30 73 163 33 803 60 145 611 31 Initial Q (Qb), veh 000000000000
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 1673 1772 1772 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 57 109 43 32 78 141 35 854 60 154 650 31 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, %222222222222
Cap, veh/h 269 269 106 328 127 229 448 1695 119 363 1740 83 Arrive On Green 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 Sat Flow, veh/h 1040 1203 475 1104 566 1022 679 3185 224 546 3271 156 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 152 32 0 219 35 451 463 154 334 347 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1040 0 1677 1104 0 1588 679 1683 1726 546 1683 1744 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 3.4 1.1 0.0 5.4 1.4 7.4 7.4 10.9 5.0 5.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.7 0.0 3.4 4.5 0.0 5.4 6.4 7.4 7.4 18.3 5.0 5.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.28 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.09
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 269 0 375 328 0 355 448 895 918 363 895 928 V/C Ratio(X) 0.21 0.00 0.40 0.10 0.00 0.62 0.08 0.50 0.50 0.42 0.37 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 588 0 889 666 0 842 500 1024 1050 405 1024 1061 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 18.6 0.0 14.4 16.3 0.0 15.2 7.8 6.5 6.5 12.4 5.9 5.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.1 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 1.9 0.1 1.5 1.6 1.0 1.0 1.1 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 19.0 0.0 15.1 16.4 0.0 16.9 7.9 6.9 6.9 13.1 6.2 6.2 LnGrp LOS BABBABAAABAA
Approach Vol, veh/h 209 251 949 835
Approach Delay, s/veh 16.1 16.8 7.0 7.5
Approach LOS BBAA
Timer - Assigned Phs 2468
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.5 14.9 28.5 14.9
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.4 5.2 5.4 5.2
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26.4 23.0 26.4 23.0
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.4 9.7 20.3 7.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.4 0.8 2.8 1.3
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.1
HCM 6th LOS A

5.2-13 Page 3495 of 3744

HCM 6th TWSC Villa Serna (Tract 20245) (JN 14896)
5: 15th St. & Coyote Run Dr. East 04/23/2024
Opening Year Cumulative (2025) With Project - PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Urban Crossroads, Inc.Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 6 0 3 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 6 0 3 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 -
Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 4 7 0 3 0
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2
Conflicting Flow All - 0 - 0 11 7
Stage 1 - - - - 7 -
Stage 2 - - - - 4 -
Critical Hdwy - - - - 6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - - - 3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 0 1009 1075
Stage 1 0 - - 0 1016 -
Stage 2 0 - - 0 1019 -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - - - 1009 1075
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 1009 -
Stage 1 - - - - 1016 -
Stage 2 - - - - 1019 -
Approach EB WB SB
HCM Control Delay, s/v 0 0 8.6

HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBT WBTSBLn1
Capacity (veh/h)- - 1009
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.003
HCM Control Delay (s/veh) - - 8.6
HCM Lane LOS - - A
HCM 95th %tile Q (veh) - - 0

5.2-14 Page 3496 of 3744

Villa Serena Specific Plan Traffic Analysis

14896-04 TA Report
APPENDIX 5.3: OPENING YEAR CUMULATIVE (2025) WITH PROJECT

CONDITIONS FREEWAY TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS

WORKSHEETS

Page 3497 of 3744 ends

Villa Serena Specific Plan Traffic Analysis

14896-04 TA Report
This Page Intentionally Left Blank

Page 3498 of 3744 ends

California MUTCD 2014 (FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
(Average Traffic Estimate Form)
___ ___ ___ ___TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

DIST CO RTE PM CALC DATE
Jurisdiction:City of Upland CHK DATE
Major Street:15th St.Critical Approach Speed (Major) 25 mph Minor Street:Coyote Run Dr.-West Critical Approach Speed (Minor) 25 mph Major Street Approach Lanes =1 lane Minor Street Approach Lanes 1 lane Major Street Future ADT =261 vpd Minor Street Future ADT =261 vpd Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 64 km/h (40 mph); ….…... or
In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population …………….….….

Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Urban Rural Urban Rural
1 261 1 261 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680
2 + 1 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680
2 + 2 +9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240
1 2 +8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240
Satisfied Not Satisfied
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Urban Rural Urban Rural
1 261 1 261 12,000 8,400 1,200 850
2 + 1 14,400 10,080 1,200 850
2 + 2 +14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120
1 2 +12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120
No one condition satisfied, but following conditions
fulfilled 80% of more ….. A B
3% 2%
Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

XX
on Higher-Volume
2025 WP
CS
CS
10/04/22
10/04/22
(Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note)
Major Street Minor Street
CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic
Vehicles Per Day
on Major Street

URBAN (U)

URBAN RURAL
Major Street Minor Street
The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal. (Total of Both Approaches)
Combination of CONDITIONS A + B
2 CONDITIONS
80%
2 CONDITIONS
80%
Satisfied Not Satisfied
XX
(One Direction Only)
Satisfied Not Satisfied
XX
CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Vehicles Per Day Vehicles Per Day on
Minor Street Approach
(One Direction Only)
Minimum Requirements
EADT
Vehicles Per Day
on Higher-Volume
Major Street
(Total of Both Approaches)
Minor Street Approach

5.3-1 Page 3499 of 3744

California MUTCD 2014 (FHWA's MUTCD 2009, as amended for use in California) Figure 4C-103 (CA). Traffic Signal Warrants Worksheet
(Average Traffic Estimate Form)
___ ___ ___ ___TRAFFIC CONDITIONS

DIST CO RTE PM CALC DATE
Jurisdiction:City of Upland CHK DATE
Major Street:15th St.Critical Approach Speed (Major) 25 mph Minor Street:Coyote Run Dr.-East Critical Approach Speed (Minor) 25 mph Major Street Approach Lanes =1 lane Minor Street Approach Lanes 1 lane Major Street Future ADT =46 vpd Minor Street Future ADT =160 vpd Speed limit or critical speed on major street traffic > 64 km/h (40 mph); ….…... or
In built up area of isolated community of < 10,000 population …………….….….

Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Urban Rural Urban Rural
1 46 1 160 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680
2 + 1 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680
2 + 2 +9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240
1 2 +8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240
Satisfied Not Satisfied
XX
Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach
Urban Rural Urban Rural
1 46 1 160 12,000 8,400 1,200 850
2 + 1 14,400 10,080 1,200 850
2 + 2 +14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120
1 2 +12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120
No one condition satisfied, but following conditions
fulfilled 80% of more ….. A B
1% 0%
Note: To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where it is not reasonable to count actual traffic volumes.

The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.

Combination of CONDITIONS A + B
2 CONDITIONS
80%
2 CONDITIONS
80%
Satisfied Not Satisfied
XX
on Major Street Minor Street Approach
(Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only)
Major Street Minor Street
Major Street Minor Street
CONDITION B - Interruption of Continuous Traffic Vehicles Per Day Vehicles Per Day on Higher-Volume
XX Major Street Minor Street Approach
(Total of Both Approaches) (One Direction Only)
CONDITION A - Minimum Vehicular Volume Vehicles Per Day Satisfied Not Satisfied Vehicles Per Day on on Higher-Volume

URBAN (U)
(Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic - See Note)
URBAN RURAL Minimum Requirements

XX EADT
2025 WP
CS 10/04/22
CS 10/04/22

5.3-2 Page 3500 of 3744

R ECIRCULATED D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
O CTOBER 2024

V ILLA S ERENA S PECIFIC P LAN P ROJECT

U PLAND , C ALIFORNIA

\\aznasunifiler2\projects\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Draft EIR\October 2024 Draft EIR\Appendices - Current\00-Appendix Cover Sheets.docx (10/15/24) APPENDIX G-2

VMT SCREENING EVALUATION

Page 3501 of 3744 ends

V ILLA S ERENA S PECIFIC P LAN P ROJECT

U PLAND , C ALIFORNIA

R ECIRCULATED D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
O CTOBER 2024

\\aznasunifiler2\projects\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Draft EIR\October 2024 Draft EIR\Appendices - Current\00-Appendix Cover Sheets.docx (10/15/24) This page intentionally left blank

Page 3502 of 3744 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx

July 20, 2022
Mr. Brian A. Bush
Diversified Pacific
10621 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

VILLA SERENA VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT) SCREENING EVALUATION Mr. Brian A. Bush,
Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide the following Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Screening Evaluation for the Villa Serena development (Project) which is located northeast of Fernando Avenue and E 15th Street in the City of Upland.

PROJECT OVERVIEW
It is our understanding that the project is to consist of 65 single family detached residential dwelling units. Preliminary site plan as shown below in Exhibit 1.

EXHIBIT 1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN

Page 3503 of 3744 ends

Mr. Brian A. Bush
Diversified Pacific
July 20, 2022

Page 2 of 4 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx

BACKGROUND
Changes to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines were adopted in December 2018, which require all lead agencies to adopt VMT as a replacement for automobile delay-based level of service (LOS) as the measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects.

This statewide mandate went into effect July 1, 2020. To aid in this transition, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December of 2018) (Technical Advisory) (1). Based on the Technical Advisory, the City of Upland has developed and adopted their own VMT methodologies and thresholds, as documented in the City of Upland Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines (City Guidelines) (2). This VMT screening evaluation has been developed based on the adopted City Guidelines.

VMT SCREENING
The City Guidelines identify Projects that meet certain VMT screening criteria may be presumed to result in a less than significant transportation impact. It is our understanding the City of Upland utilizes the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) VMT Screening Tool (Screening Tool). The Screening Tool allows users to select an assessor’s parcel number (APN) to determine if a project’s location meets one or more of the screening thresholds for land use projects identified in the City Guidelines. The City Guidelines lists the following VMT screening steps:
• Step 1: Transit Priority Area (TPA) Screening
• Step 2: Low VMT Area Screening
• Step 3: Project Type Screening
A land use project need only meet one of the above screening criteria to result in a less than significant impact.

STEP 1: TPA SCREENING
Consistent with guidance identified in the City Guidelines, projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) (i.e., within ½ mile of an existing “major transit stop”1 or an existing stop along a “high- quality transit corridor”2) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. However, the presumption may not be appropriate if a project:
• Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75;

1 Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 (“‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.”). 2 Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 (“For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.”).

Page 3504 of 3744 ends

Mr. Brian A. Bush
Diversified Pacific
July 20, 2022

Page 3 of 4 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx
• Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking);
• Is inconsistent with the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy (as determined by the lead agency, with input from the Metropolitan Planning Organization); or
• Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units.

The Screening Tool was utilized to locate the Project site and its proximity to a TPA. Results, as shown in Attachment A, identifies the Project Site is not located within ½ mile of an existing major transit stop or along a high-quality transit corridor.

TPA screening criteria is not met.

STEP 2: LOW VMT AREA SCREENING
As noted in the City Guidelines, consistent with the Technical Advisory, “Residential and office projects that locate in areas with low VMT and that incorporate similar features (density, mix of uses, and transit accessibility) will tend to exhibit similarly low VMT.” The City Guidelines state that projects may be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact if located in an already low VMT generating traffic analysis zones (TAZs) that generates a VMT per service population (SP) that is better than the City of Upland General Plan Buildout VMT per SP. The Screening Tool uses the sub-regional San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM) to measure VMT performance within individual TAZ’s within the region. The Project’s physical location based on parcel number is selected in the Screening Tool to determine the TAZ in which the Project will reside. The Project’s TAZs VMT per service population was compared to City’s adopted threshold of 35.3 VMT per SP. The parcel containing the proposed Project was selected and the Screening Tool was run for origin-destination (OD) VMT per service population.

The Project’s TAZ 53656201 generates 31.4 VMT per SP, which is better than the City’s adopted threshold Citywide average VMT per SP under buildout conditions. The Project is located within a low VMT generating zone (See Attachment A).

Low VMT Area screening criteria is met.

STEP 3: PROJECT TYPE SCREENING
The City Guidelines identify that local serving retail less than 50,000 square feet or other local serving essential services (e.g., day care centers, public schools, medical/dental office buildings, etc.) are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. The Project, as intended, does not contain any local serving uses.

Additionally, the City Guidelines state that small projects generating fewer than 250 daily vehicle trips may be presumed to have a less than significant impact, subject to discretionary approval by the City. Trips generated by the Project’s proposed land uses have been estimated based on trip generation rates collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, 2021 (4). A Project of this size is anticipated to generate 614 daily vehicle

Page 3505 of 3744 ends

Mr. Brian A. Bush
Diversified Pacific
July 20, 2022

Page 4 of 4 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx
trips. Therefore, the Project generates daily vehicle trips exceeding the 250 daily vehicle trip threshold (See Attachment B).

Project Type screening criteria is not met.

CONCLUSION
In summary, the Project was found to meet Low VMT Area screening criteria. The Project’s impact on VMT is presumed to be less than significant; no further VMT analysis required.

If you have any questions, please contact me directly at [email protected].

Respectfully submitted,
URBAN CROSSROADS, INC.

Alexander So
Senior Associate

Page 3506 of 3744 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx

REFERENCES

1. Office of Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. State of California : s.n., December 2018.

2. City of Upland. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidlines. July 2020.

3. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Manual. 11th Edition. 2021.

Page 3507 of 3744 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx

ATTACHMENT A

SBCTA SCREENING TOOL

Page 3508 of 3744 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx

Page 3509 of 3744 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx

ATTACHMENT B

PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY

Page 3510 of 3744 ends

14896-02 VMT.docx
TABLE 1: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY

ITE
Land Use1 Code Units2 In Out Total In Out Total Daily
Single Family Detached Residential 210 DU 0.18 0.52 0.70 0.59 0.35 0.94 9.43 1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Eleventh Edition (2021). 2 DU = dwelling units
Land Use Quantity Units1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Lyon Avenue Project (TTM No. 38468)65 DU 12 34 46 38 23 61 614 1 DU = dwelling units
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour

Page 3511 of 3744 ends

V ILLA S ERENA S PECIFIC P LAN P ROJECT

U PLAND , C ALIFORNIA

R ECIRCULATED D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
O CTOBER 2024

\\aznasunifiler2\projects\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Draft EIR\October 2024 Draft EIR\Appendices - Current\00-Appendix Cover Sheets.docx (10/15/24) This page intentionally left blank

Page 3512 of 3744 ends

R ECIRCULATED D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
O CTOBER 2024

V ILLA S ERENA S PECIFIC P LAN P ROJECT

U PLAND , C ALIFORNIA

\\aznasunifiler2\projects\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Draft EIR\October 2024 Draft EIR\Appendices - Current\00-Appendix Cover Sheets.docx (10/15/24)

APPENDIX H

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT

Page 3513 of 3744 ends

V ILLA S ERENA S PECIFIC P LAN P ROJECT

U PLAND , C ALIFORNIA

R ECIRCULATED D RAFT E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT R EPORT
O CTOBER 2024

\\aznasunifiler2\projects\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Draft EIR\October 2024 Draft EIR\Appendices - Current\00-Appendix Cover Sheets.docx (10/15/24) This page intentionally left blank

Page 3514 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report for
the Villa Serena Project
San Bernardino County, California
Prepared For:

Robert D. Dalquest
Development Services Director
City of Upland, California 91786
P: 909.931.4148
[email protected]

Joshua Winters
Senior Planner
City of Upland, California 91786
P: 909.931.4143
[email protected]
Prepared By:
215 North Fifth Street
Redlands, California 92374
March 2023

Page 3515 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project i March 2023
2023-006

MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
The Colonies Partners, L.P. retained ECORP Consulting, Inc. in 2023 to conduct an updated cultural resources inventory for the Villa Serena Project (Project or Proposed Project) in San Bernardino County, California. Colonies Partners proposes to construct 65 single-family residential units across 23.21 acres of land north of east of Saint Elias Way, south of Upland Hills Drive South, west of Spyglass Drive, and north of (including portions of) East 15th Street, in the City of Upland, California.

The inventory included an updated records search, literature review, and field survey. The records search results indicated that 48 previous cultural resources studies have been conducted within 1 mile of the Project Area, of which two include portions of the Project Area. An additional report completed in 2018 that encompasses portions of the Project Area was supplied to ECORP but was not included as part of the CHRIS search. As a result of those studies, 37 sites have previously been recorded within 1 mile of the Project Area. Of those 37 sites, 9 are from the pre-contact period and associated with Native American culture, consisting of tool and processing remnants and lithic scatters, and 28 are from the historic period, consisting of early built structures including inns, restaurant adobes, and agriculture activities. None of these resources are located within the Project Area.

The field survey resulted in the observation of an existing detention basin that was constructed by 1967 but modified by 1985 to its current configuration. No archaeological resources were identified during the field survey. Recommendations for the management of unanticipated discoveries are provided.

Page 3516 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project ii March 2023
2023-006

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Project Location and Description.................................................................................................................. 1

1.2 Area of Potential Effects ................................................................................................................................... 1

1.3 Regulatory Context ............................................................................................................................................. 3

1.3.1 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................................................. 3

1.3.2 National Historic Preservation Act ............................................................................................... 4

1.3.3 California Environmental Quality Act.......................................................................................... 5

1.4 Report Organization .......................................................................................................................................... 6

2.0 SETTING ................................................................................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 Environmental Setting ....................................................................................................................................... 7

3.0 CULTURAL CONTEXT .......................................................................................................................................................... 7

3.1 Regional Pre-Contact History ......................................................................................................................... 7

3.1.1 Paleo-Indian Period/Terminal Pleistocene (12,000 to 10,000 BP) ................................... 7

3.1.2 Early Archaic Period/Early Holocene (10,000 to 8,500 BP) ................................................. 7

3.1.3 Encinitas Tradition or Milling Stone Period/Middle Holocene (8,500 to 1,250 BP) ................................................................................................................................................ 8

3.1.4 Palomar Tradition (1,250 to 150 BP) ........................................................................................... 9

3.2 Local Pre-Contact History ............................................................................................................................. 10

3.3 Ethnography ....................................................................................................................................................... 11

3.4 Regional History ............................................................................................................................................... 12

3.5 History of Upland ............................................................................................................................................. 12

4.0 METHODS ............................................................................................................................................................................ 13

4.1 Personnel Qualifications ................................................................................................................................ 13

4.2 Records Search Methods .............................................................................................................................. 14

4.3 Sacred Lands File Coordination Methods .............................................................................................. 14

4.4 Other Interested Party Consultation Methods ..................................................................................... 15

4.5 Field Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 15

5.0 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................................................ 15

5.1 Records Search .................................................................................................................................................. 15

5.1.1 Previous Research ........................................................................................................................... 15

5.1.2 Records ................................................................................................................................................ 16

5.1.3 Map Review and Aerial Photographs ...................................................................................... 17

5.2 Sacred Lands File Results .............................................................................................................................. 18

5.3 Other Interested Party Consultation Results ......................................................................................... 18

Page 3517 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project iii March 2023
2023-006

5.4 Field Survey Results ......................................................................................................................................... 18

6.0 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 21

6.1 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................ 21

6.2 Likelihood for Subsurface Cultural Resources ...................................................................................... 21

6.3 Post-Review Discoveries ................................................................................................................................ 21

7.0 REFERENCES CITED .......................................................................................................................................................... 23

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2. APE Overview (view north; February 14, 2023). .................................................................................................. 19 Figure 3. APE Overview (view west; February 14, 2023). .................................................................................................... 19 Figure 4. 15th Street (view southwest; February 14, 2023). .............................................................................................. 20

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Previous Cultural Studies within the Project Area ............................................................................................... 16

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Records Search Confirmation and Historical Society Coordination Appendix B – Sacred Lands File Coordination
Appendix C – Project Area Photographs

Page 3518 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project iv March 2023
2023-006

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
AB Assembly Bill
ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
APE Area of Potential Effect
BP Before Present
Caltrans California Department of Transportation
CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CHL California Historical Landmarks
CHRIS California Historical Resources Information System CRHR California Register of Historical Resources
DPR Department of Parks and Recreation MLD Most Likely Descendant NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
NPS National Park Service
NRHP National Register of Historic Places
OHP California Office of Historic Preservation
PRC Public Resources Code
Project Villa Serena Project
RPA Registered Professional Archaeologist
SCCIC South Central Coastal Information Center
SHPO State Historic Preservation Officer TCR Tribal Cultural Resource USGS United States Geological Survey

Page 3519 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 1 March 2023
2023-006

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Colonies Partners, L.P. retained ECORP Consulting, Inc. in 2023 to conduct an updated cultural resources inventory for the Villa Serena Project (Project or Proposed Project) in the City of Upland in San Bernardino County, California. A survey of the Project Area was required to identify potentially eligible cultural resources (i.e., archaeological sites and historic buildings, structures, and objects) that could be affected by the Project.

1.1 Project Location and Description
The Project Area consists of 23.21 acres of property located in an unsectioned portion of the Cucamonga Land Grant in Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian, as depicted on the 1967 (Photorevised 1981) Ontario, California U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map (Figure 1). It is also known as Assessor Parcel Number 1045-121-04-0000. The Project Area is located east of Saint Elias Way, south of Upland Hills Drive South, west of Spyglass Drive, and north of (including portions of) East 15th Street, in the City of Upland, California.

The proposed Project entails the construction of 65 single family residential units and associated recreational space.

1.2 Area of Potential Effects
The Area of Potential Effects (APE) consists of the horizontal and vertical limits of a project and includes the area within which significant impacts or adverse effects to Historical Resources or Historic Properties could occur as a result of the project. The APE is defined for projects subject to regulations implementing Section 106 (federal law and regulations). For projects subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, the term Project Area is used rather than APE. The terms Project Area and APE are interchangeable for the purpose of this document.

The horizontal APE consists of all areas where activities associated with a project are proposed and, in the case of this project, equals the Project Area subject to environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and CEQA. This includes areas proposed for construction, vegetation removal, grading, trenching, stockpiling, staging, paving, and other elements in the official Project description. The horizontal APE is illustrated in Figure 1 and represents the survey coverage area.

Page 3520 of 3744 ends

Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity
2023-006 Villa Serena Project

Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
:

N
:
\
2 0
2 3
\
2 0
2 3
-
0 0
6 C
o
l
o
n
i
e
s

P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s

U
p
l
a
n
d
\
M
A
P
S
\
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
_
V
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
\
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

V
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
.
a
p
r
x

C
o
l
o
n
i
e
s
_
L
n
V

(
t
r
o
t
e
l
l
i
n
i

1 /
9 /
2 0
2 3
)
I 0 1,000 2,000
Scale in Feet
Ontario, CA (1978)
Guasti, CA (1978
CA 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle
US Geological Survey
San Bernardino County, California
Unsectioned Cucamonga Land Grant, SBBM
Latitude (NAD83): 34.1184592°N
Longitude (NAD83): 117.6323667°W
Watershed: Santa Ana (#18070203)
Map Date: 1/9/2023
Sources: ESRI, USGS
Map Features
Project Site - 23.21 Acres

Page 3521 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 3 March 2023
2023-006

The vertical APE is described as the maximum depth below the surface to which excavations for project foundations and facilities will extend. Therefore, the vertical APE for this project includes all subsurface areas where archaeological deposits could be affected. The vertical APE also is described as the maximum height of structures that could impact the physical integrity and integrity of setting of cultural resources, including districts and traditional cultural properties. For this project, the above-surface vertical APE is up to 50 feet above the surface. The subsurface vertical APE varies across the project, depending on foundation, leveling, compaction, trenching and other requirements for the residential units. In the event that any obstacles are encountered, ground disturbance of up to 15 feet below the surface will be necessary. It could extend as deep as 20 feet below the current surface, and therefore, a review of geologic and soils maps was necessary to determine the potential for buried archaeological sites that cannot be seen on the surface.

1.3 Regulatory Context
A review of the regulatory context is provided below; however, the inclusion of any of these laws and regulations in this report does not make a law or regulation apply when it otherwise would not. Similarly, the omission of any other laws and regulations from this section does not mean that they do not apply.

Rather, the purpose of this section is to provide context in explaining why the study was carried out in the manner documented herein.

1.3.1 National Environmental Policy Act
NEPA establishes national policy for the protection and enhancement of the environment. Part of the function of the federal government in protecting the environment is to “preserve important historic, cultural, and natural aspects of our national heritage.” Cultural resources need not be determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) through the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (as amended) to receive consideration under NEPA. NEPA is implemented by regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508).

The definition of effects in the NEPA regulations includes adverse and beneficial effects on historic and cultural resources (40 CFR 1508.8). Therefore, the Environmental Consequences section of an Environmental Impact Statement (see 40 CFR 1502.16(f)) must analyze potential effects to historic or cultural resources that could result from the proposed action and each alternative. In considering whether an alternative may “significantly affect the quality of the human environment,” a federal agency must consider, among other things:
 Unique characteristics of the geographic area, such as proximity to historic or cultural resources (40 CFR 1508.27(b)(3)), and
 The degree to which the action may adversely affect districts, sites, highways, structures, or objects listed in or eligible for listing in the NRHP (40 CFR 1508.27(b)(8)).

Therefore, because historic properties are a subset of cultural resources, they are one aspect of the human environment defined by NEPA regulations.

Page 3522 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 4 March 2023
2023-006

1.3.2 National Historic Preservation Act
The federal law that covers cultural resources that could be affected by federal undertakings is the NHPA of 1966, as amended. Section 106 of the NHPA requires that federal agencies take into account the effects of a federal undertaking on properties listed in or eligible for the NRHP. The agencies must afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) a reasonable opportunity to comment on the undertaking. A federal undertaking is defined in 36 CFR 800.16(y):

A federal undertaking means a project, activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a federal agency; those carried out with Federal financial assistance; and those requiring a Federal permit, license, or approval.

The regulations that stipulate the procedures for complying with Section 106 are in 36 CFR 800. The Section 106 regulations require:
 definition of the APE;
 identification of cultural resources within the APE;
 evaluation of the identified resources in the APE using NRHP eligibility criteria;  determination of whether the effects of the undertaking or project on eligible resources will be adverse; and
 agreement on and implementation of efforts to resolve adverse effects, if necessary.

The federal agency must seek comment from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and, in some cases, the ACHP, for its determinations of eligibility, effects, and proposed mitigation measures. Section 106 procedures for a specific project can be modified by negotiation of a Memorandum of Agreement or Programmatic Agreement between the federal agency, the SHPO, and, in some cases, the project proponent.

Effects to a cultural resource are potentially adverse if the lead federal agency, with the SHPO’s concurrence, determines the resource eligible for the NRHP, making it a Historic Property, and if application of the Criteria of Adverse Effects (36 CFR 800.5[a][2] et seq.) results in the conclusion that the effects will be adverse. The NRHP eligibility criteria, contained in 36 CFR 63, are as follows:

The quality of significance in American history, architecture, archaeology, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects of state and local importance that possess aspects of integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, and A. that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
B. that are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or

Page 3523 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 5 March 2023
2023-006

C. that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory.

In addition, the resource must be at least 50 years old, barring exceptional circumstances (36 CFR 60.4).

Resources that are eligible for, or listed on, the NRHP are historic properties.

Regulations implementing Section 106 of the NHPA (36 CFR 800.5) require that the federal agency, in consultation with the SHPO, apply the Criteria of Adverse Effect to historic properties within the APE.

According to 36 CFR 800.5(a)(1):

An adverse effect is found when an undertaking may alter, directly or indirectly, any of the characteristics of a historic property that qualify the property for inclusion in the National Register in a manner that would diminish the integrity of the property’s location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling or association.

1.3.3 California Environmental Quality Act
CEQA is the state law that applies to a project’s impacts on cultural resources. A project is an activity that may cause a direct or indirect physical change in the environment and that is undertaken or funded by a state or local agency, or requires a permit, license, or lease from a state or local agency. CEQA requires that impacts to Historical Resources be identified and, if the impacts will be significant, then apply mitigation measures to reduce the impacts.

A Historical Resource is a resource that 1) is listed in or has been determined eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) by the State Historical Resources Commission, or has been determined historically significant by the CEQA lead agency because it meets the eligibility criteria for the CRHR, 2) is included in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Public Resources Code (PRC) 5020.1(k), or 3), and has been identified as significant in a historical resources survey, as defined in PRC 5024.1(g) (California Code of Regulations [CCR] Title 14, Section 15064.5(a)).

The eligibility criteria for the CRHR are as follows (CCR Title 14, Section 4852(b)):
(1) It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; (2) It is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history; (3) It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values; or (4) It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation.

Page 3524 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 6 March 2023
2023-006

In addition, the resource must retain integrity, which is evaluated with regard to the retention of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association (CCR Title 14, Section 4852(c)). Resources that have been determined eligible for the NRHP are automatically eligible for the CRHR.

Impacts to a Historical Resource, as defined by CEQA (listed in an official historic inventory or survey or eligible for the CRHR), are significant if the resource is demolished or destroyed or if the characteristics that made the resource eligible are materially impaired (CCR Title 14, Section 15064.5(b)). Demolition or alteration of eligible buildings, structures, and features that they would no longer be eligible would result in a significant impact. Whole or partial destruction of eligible archaeological sites would result in a significant impact. In addition to impacts from construction resulting in destruction or physical alteration of an eligible resource, impacts to the integrity of setting (sometimes termed visual impacts) of physical features in the Project Area could also result in significant impacts.

Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) are defined in Section 21074 of the California PRC as sites, features, places, cultural landscapes (geographically defined in terms of the size and scope), sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included in or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the CRHR, or are included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision (k) of Section 5020.1, or are a resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1. Section 1(b)(4) of Assembly Bill (AB) 52 established that only California Native American tribes, as defined in Section 21073 of the California PRC, are experts in the identification of TCRs and impacts thereto. Because ECORP does not meet the definition of a California Native American tribe, it only addresses information in this report for which it is qualified to identify and evaluate, and that which is needed to inform the cultural resources section of CEQA documents. This report, therefore, does not identify or evaluate TCRs. Should California Native American tribes ascribe additional importance to or interpretation of archaeological resources described herein, or provide information about non- archeological TCRs, that information is documented separately in the AB 52 tribal consultation record between the tribe(s) and lead agency and summarized in the TCRs section of the CEQA document, if applicable.

1.4 Report Organization
The following report documents the study and its findings and was prepared in conformance with the California Office of Historic Preservation’s (OHP) Archaeological Resource Management Reports:

Recommended Contents and Format. Appendix A includes a confirmation of the records search with the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) and historical society coordination. Appendix B contains documentation of a search of the Sacred Lands File. Appendix C presents photographs of the Project Area.

Page 3525 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 7 March 2023
2023-006

2.0 SETTING

2.1 Environmental Setting
The Project Area is approximately 1,430 feet above mean sea level and is located south of the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. The Project Area is a mostly flat strip of vacant land oriented east–west that slopes down to the south. A housing complex is immediately to the south and a golf course to the north.

The soils in the Project Area consist of mostly Soboba stony loamy sand, 2 to 9 percent slopes. Less than two percent of the Project Area consists of Soboba gravelly loamy sand, 0 to 9 percent slopes. Both are excessively drained alluvium derived from granite. There exists the potential for buried pre-contact archaeological sites in the Project Area due to the presence of alluvium within the Project Area; however, the heavily disturbed nature of the Project Area suggests that the potential is low.

The dominant plant community within the Project Area includes the floating primrose-willow, hackberries, and American black nightshade. Wildlife species that may occur in the Project Area include the fox squirrel and the western fence lizard.

3.0 CULTURAL CONTEXT

3.1 Regional Pre-Contact History

3.1.1 Paleo-Indian Period/Terminal Pleistocene (12,000 to 10,000 BP) The first inhabitants of southern California were big game hunters and gatherers exploiting extinct species of Pleistocene megafauna (e.g., mammoth and other Rancholabrean fauna). Local fluted point assemblages comprised large spear points or knives are stylistically and technologically similar to the Clovis Paleo-Indian cultural tradition dated to this period elsewhere in North America (Moratto 1984).

Archaeological evidence for this period in southern California is limited to a few small temporary camps with fluted points found around late Pleistocene lake margins in the Mojave Desert and around Tulare Lake in the southern San Joaquin Valley. Single points are reported from Ocotillo Wells and Cuyamaca Pass in eastern San Diego County and from the Yuha Desert in Imperial County (Rondeau et al. 2007).

3.1.2 Early Archaic Period/Early Holocene (10,000 to 8,500 BP) Approximately 10,000 years ago, at the beginning of the Holocene, warming temperatures, and the extinction of the megafauna resulted in changing subsistence strategies with an emphasis hunting smaller game and increasing reliance on plant gathering. Previously, Early Holocene sites were represented by only a few sites and isolates from the Lake Mojave and San Dieguito complexes found along former lakebeds and grasslands of the Mojave Desert and in inland San Diego County. More recently, southern California Early Holocene sites have been found along the Santa Barbara Channel (Erlandson 1994), in western Riverside County (Goldberg 2001; Grenda 1997), and along the San Diego County coast (Gallegos 1991; Koerper et al. 1991; Warren 1967).

Page 3526 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 8 March 2023
2023-006

The San Dieguito Complex was defined based on material found at the Harris site (CA-SDI-149) on the San Dieguito River near Lake Hodges in San Diego County. San Dieguito artifacts include large leaf- shaped points; leaf-shaped knives; large ovoid, domed, and rectangular end and side scrapers; engraving tools; and crescentics (Koerper et al. 1991). The San Dieguito Complex at the Harris site dates to 9,000 to 7,500 Before Present (BP) (Gallegos 1991). However, sites from this time period in coastal San Diego County have yielded artifacts and subsistence remains characteristic of the succeeding Encinitas Tradition, including manos, metates, core-cobble tools, and marine shell (Gallegos 1991; Koerper et al. 1991).

3.1.3 Encinitas Tradition or Milling Stone Period/Middle Holocene (8,500 to 1,250 BP)
The Encinitas Tradition (Warren 1968) and the Milling Stone Period (Wallace 1955) refer to a long period of time during which small mobile bands of people who spoke an early Hokan language foraged for a wide variety of resources including hard seeds, berries, and roots/tubers (yucca in inland areas), rabbits and other small animals, and shellfish and fish in coastal areas. Sites from the Encinitas Tradition consist of residential bases and resource acquisition locations with no evidence for overnight stays. Residential bases have hearths and fire-affected rock indicating overnight stays and food preparation. Residential bases along the coast have large amounts of shell and are often termed shell middens.

The Encinitas Tradition as originally defined (Warren 1968) applied to all of the non-desert areas of southern California. Recently, four patterns within the Encinitas Tradition have been proposed which apply to different regions of southern California (Sutton and Gardner 2010). The Topanga Pattern includes archaeological material from the Los Angeles Basin and Orange County. The Greven Knoll Pattern pertains to southwestern San Bernardino County and western Riverside County (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Each of the patterns is divided into temporal phases. The Topanga Pattern included the Los Angeles Basin and Orange County. The Topanga I phase extends from 8,500 to 5,000 BP and Topanga II runs from 5,000 to 3,500 BP. The Topanga Pattern ended about 3,500 BP with the arrival of Takic speakers, except in the Santa Monica Mountains where the Topanga III phase lasted until about 2,000 BP.

The Encinitas Tradition in inland areas east of the Topanga Pattern (southwestern San Bernardino County and western Riverside County) is the Greven Knoll Pattern (Sutton and Gardner 2010). Greven Knoll I (9,400 to 4,000 BP) has abundant manos and metates. Projectile points are few and are mostly Pinto points. Greven Knoll II (4,000 to 3,000 BP) has abundant manos and metates and core tools. Projectile points are mostly Elko points. The Elsinore site on the east shore of Lake Elsinore was occupied during Greven Knoll I and Greven Knoll II. During Greven Knoll I faunal processing (butchering) took place at the lakeshore and floral processing (seed grinding), cooking, and eating took place farther from the shore.

The primary foods were rabbit meat and seeds from grasses, sage, and ragweed. A few deer, waterfowl, and reptiles were consumed. The recovered archaeological material suggests that a highly mobile population visited the site at a specific time each year. It is possible that their seasonal round included the ocean coast at other times of the year. These people had an unspecialized technology as exemplified by the numerous crescents, a multi-purpose tool. The few projectile points suggest that most of the small game was trapped using nets and snares (Grenda 1997:279). During Greven Knoll II, which included a warmer drier climatic episode known as the Altithermal, it is thought that populations in interior southern California concentrated at oases and that Lake Elsinore was one of them. The Elsinore site (CA-RIV-2798)

Page 3527 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 9 March 2023
2023-006

is one of five known Middle Holocene residential sites around Lake Elsinore. Tools were mostly manos, metates, and hammerstones. Scraper planes were absent. Flaked-stone tools consisted mostly of utilized flakes used as scrapers. The Elsinore site during the Middle Holocene was a recurrent extended encampment, which could have been occupied during much of the year.

The Encinitas Tradition lasted longer in inland areas because Takic speakers did not move east into these areas until circa 1,000 BP. Greven Knoll III (3,000 to 1,000 BP) is present at the Liberty Grove site in Cucamonga (Salls 1983) and at sites in Cajon Pass that were defined as part of the Sayles Complex (Kowta 1969). Greven Knoll III sites have a large proportion of manos and metates and core tools as well as scraper planes. Kowta (1969) suggested the scraper planes may have been used to process yucca and agave. The faunal assemblage consists of large quantities of lagomorphs (rabbits and hares) and lesser quantities of deer, rodents, birds, carnivores, and reptiles.

3.1.4 Palomar Tradition (1,250 to 150 BP)
The native people of southern California (north of a line from Agua Hedionda to Lake Henshaw in San Diego County) spoke Takic languages which form a branch or subfamily of the Uto-Aztecan language family. The Takic languages are divided into the Gabrielino-Fernandeño language, the Serrano-Kitanemuk group (the Serrano [includes the Vanyume dialect] and Kitanemuk languages), the Tataviam language, and the Cupan group (the Luiseño-Juaneño language, the Cahuilla Language, and the Cupeño language) (Golla 2011). According to Sutton (2009), Takic speakers occupied the southern San Joaquin Valley before 3,500 BP. Perhaps as a result of the arrival of Yokutsan speakers (a language in the Penutian language family) from the north, Takic speakers moved southeast. The ancestors of the Kitanemuk moved into the Tehachapi Mountains and the ancestors of the Tataviam moved into the upper Santa Clara River drainage.

The ancestors of the Gabrielino (Tongva) moved into the Los Angeles Basin about 3,500 BP, replacing the native Hokan speakers. Speakers of proto-Gabrielino reached the southern Channel Islands by 3,200 BP (Sutton 2009) and moved as far south as Aliso Creek in Orange County by 3,000 BP.

Takic people moved south into southern Orange County after 1,250 BP and became the ancestors of the Juaneño. Takic people moved inland from southern Orange County about 1,000 BP, becoming the ancestors of the Luiseño, Cupeño, and Cahuilla. Takic people from the Kitanemuk area moved east along the northern slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains and spread into the San Bernardino Mountains and along the Mojave River becoming the ancestors of the Serrano and the Vanyume.

The material culture of the inland areas where Takic languages were spoken at the time of Spanish contact is part of the Palomar Tradition (Sutton 2011). San Luis Rey I Phase (1,000 to 500 BP) and San Luis Rey II Phase (500 to 150 BP) pertain to the area occupied by the Luiseño at the time of Spanish contact.

The Peninsular I (1,000 to 750 BP), II (750 to 300 BP), and III (300 to 150 BP) Phases are used in the areas occupied by the Cahuilla and Serrano (Sutton 2011).

San Luis Rey I is characterized by Cottonwood Triangular arrow points, use of bedrock mortars, stone pendants, shell beads, quartz crystals, and bone tools. San Luis Rey II sees the addition of ceramics, including ceramic cremation urns, red pictographs on boulders in village sites, and steatite arrow straighteners. San Luis Rey II represents the archaeological manifestation of the antecedents of the historically known Luiseño (Goldberg 2001). During San Luis Rey I there were a series of small permanent

Page 3528 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 10 March 2023
2023-006

residential bases at water sources, each occupied by a kin group (probably a lineage). During San Luis Rey II people from several related residential bases moved into a large village located at the most reliable water source (Waugh 1986). Each village had a territory that included acorn harvesting camps at higher elevations. Villages have numerous bedrock mortars, large dense midden areas with a full range of flaked and ground stone tools, rock art, and a cemetery.

3.2 Local Pre-Contact History
The native people of southern California (north of a line from Agua Hedionda to Lake Henshaw in San Diego County) spoke Takic languages which form a branch or subfamily of the Uto-Aztecan language family. The Takic languages are divided into the Gabrielino-Fernandeño language, the Serrano-Kitanemuk group (the Serrano [includes the Vanyume or Desert Serrano dialect] and Kitanemuk languages), the Tataviam language, and the Cupan group (the Luiseño-Juaneño language, the Cahuilla Language, and the Cupeño language) (Golla 2011). According to Sutton (2009), Takic speakers occupied the southern San Joaquin Valley before 3,500 BP. Perhaps as a result of the arrival of Yokutsan speakers (a language in the Penutian language family) from the north, Takic speakers moved southeast. The ancestors of the Kitanemuk moved into the Tehachapi Mountains and the ancestors of the Tataviam moved into the upper Santa Clara River drainage. The ancestors of the Gabrielino (Tongva) moved into the Los Angeles Basin about 3,500 BP replacing the native Hokan speakers. Speakers of proto-Gabrielino reached the southern Channel Islands by 3,200 BP (Sutton 2009).

The material culture of the ancestors of the Gabrielino is termed the Del Rey Tradition (3,500 to 150 BP) (Sutton 2010). With the arrival of the Takic speakers, settlement and subsistence systems changed.

Mobility was greatly decreased compared to the Encinitas Tradition and small groups of related people lived in semi-permanent residential bases near a water source. Subsistence changed from a mobile foraging pattern to a collector pattern (Binford 1980). People collected resources and brought them back to the residential base. When away from the residential base people stayed overnight in temporary camps.

Six phases have been defined on the mainland (Angeles I – Angeles VI) and four phases (Island I – Island IV) have been defined on the southern Channel Islands for the Del Rey Tradition (Sutton 2010). Angeles I, II, and III (3,500 to 1,250 BP) correspond with the Intermediate Horizon first defined by Wallace (1955).

During this period mortars and pestles were first used which probably indicates the beginning of acorn exploitation. Acorns required greater processing time but were storable and contributed to a greater degree of sedentism. Lithic technology was more focused on making flake tools, rather than core tools, as in the previous Encinitas Tradition. Large projectile points, including Elko points, indicate that hunting was probably still accomplished with the atlatl or spear thrower.

Angeles IV, V, and VI (1,250 to 150 BP) correspond with the Late Prehistoric Horizon as originally defined by Wallace (1955). The complex hunter-gatherer cultures encountered by the Spaniards in southern California developed during the Late Prehistoric Period. People lived in villages of up to 250 people located near permanent water and a variety of food sources. Each village was typically located at the center of a defended territory from which resources for the group were gathered. Small groups left the village for short periods of time to hunt, fish, and gather plant foods. While away from the village, they

Page 3529 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 11 March 2023
2023-006

established temporary camps and created locations where food and other materials were processed.

Archaeologically, such locations are evidenced by manos and metates for seed grinding, bedrock mortars for acorn pulverizing, and lithic scatters indicating manufacturing or maintenance of stone tools (usually made of chert) used in hunting or butchering. Overnight stays in field camps are evidenced by fire- affected rock used in hearths.

The beginning of Angeles IV is marked by the introduction of the bow and arrow, which made deer hunting more efficient. The bow and arrow was also used in wars for territorial defense. One of the most important food resources for inland groups was acorns gathered from oak groves in canyons, drainages, and foothills. Acorn processing was labor intensive, requiring grinding in a mortar and leaching with water to remove tannic acid (Basgall 1987). Many of the mortars are bedrock mortars. Seeds from sage and grasses, goosefoot, and California buckwheat were collected and ground into meal with manos and metates. Seeds were used as the storable staple in areas which lacked acorn-producing oak groves.

Protein was supplied through the meat of deer, rabbits, and other animals, hunted with bow and arrow or trapped using snares, nets, and deadfalls. On the coast fish were obtained using shell fishhooks and nets.

Trade among local groups and inland and coastal groups was important as a means of obtaining resources from outside the local group’s territory. Items traded over long distances included obsidian from the Obsidian Butte source in Imperial County and from the Coso source in Inyo County, steatite bowls and ornaments from Catalina Island, shell beads and ornaments from the Santa Barbara Channel area, rabbit skins and deer hides from the interior, and dried fish and shellfish from the coast. Acorns, seeds, and other food resources were probably exchanged locally.

3.3 Ethnography
Ethnographic accounts of Native Americans indicate that the Gabrieliño (also known as Gabrieleno, or Tongva) once occupied the region that encompasses the Project Area. At the time of contact with Europeans, the Gabrieliño were the main occupants of the southern Channel Islands, the Los Angeles Basin, much of Orange County, and extended as far east as the western San Bernardino Valley. The term Gabrieliño came from the group’s association with Mission San Gabriel Arcángel, established in 1771. The Gabrieliño are believed to have been one of the most populous and wealthy Native American tribes in southern California prior to European contact. (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Moratto 1984) and spoke a Takic language. The Takic group of languages is part of the Uto-Aztecan language family.

The Gabrieliño occupied villages located along rivers and at the mouths of canyons. Populations ranged from 50 to 200 inhabitants. Residential structures within the villages were domed, circular, and made from thatched tule or other available wood. Gabrieliño society was organized by kinship groups, with each group composed of several related families who together owned hunting and gathering territories.

Settlement patterns varied according to the availability of floral and faunal resources (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Miller 1991).

Vegetal staples consisted of acorns, chia, seeds, piñon nuts, sage, cacti, roots, and bulbs. Animals hunted included deer, antelope, coyote, rabbits, squirrels, rodents, birds, and snakes. The Gabrieliño also fished and collected marine shellfish (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Miller 1991). By the late 18th century, Gabrieliño population had significantly dwindled due to introduced European diseases and

Page 3530 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 12 March 2023
2023-006

dietary deficiencies. Gabrieliño communities disintegrated as families were taken to the missions (Bean and Smith 1978; McCawley 1996; Miller 1991). However, current descendants of the Gabrieliño are preserving Gabrieliño culture.

3.4 Regional History
Spanish colonization of California began with the Portola Expedition of 1769 during which presidios (forts) and missions were established. The missions were established near the coast beginning with San Diego in 1769 and ending with the missions established in San Rafael and Sonoma in 1823 (Castillo 1978). The purpose of the missions was to convert and control the Native American population. Mission San Gabriel Archangel was founded in 1771 east of what is now Los Angeles in Gabrielino territory. An asistencia or outpost of the San Gabriel Mission, known as the San Bernardino Rancho Asistencia, was founded in 1819 in Serrano territory near present-day Redlands.

After Mexico became independent from Spain in the early 1830s, the Mexican government closed the missions. Former mission lands were granted to soldiers and other Mexican citizens for use as cattle ranches. The San Bernardino land grant was south of the Project Area and included what are now the towns of San Bernardino and Redlands. It was granted to Jose del Carmen Lugo, Jose Maria Lugo, Vicente Lugo, and Diego Sepulveda in 1842 (Aviña 1976:91).

The American period began when the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was signed between Mexico and the United States in 1848, ending the Mexican-American War. As a result of the treaty, California became part of the United States. The rapid increase in population resulting from the Gold Rush of 1849 allowed California to become a state in 1850. In 1851, the Lugos sold a portion of the San Bernardino land grant to 500 Mormon settlers from Salt Lake City who founded the town of San Bernardino. After only 5 years, most of the Mormons returned to Salt Lake City (California Genealogy 2008). San Bernardino County was formed from Los Angeles County in 1853 and San Bernardino became the county seat (Gudde 1969:280).

3.5 History of Upland
In 1881, George Chaffey created the Etiwanda Irrigation company. By 1882, he had expanded his business to cover other areas of the former Ranch Cucamonga land grant. Upland was originally part of Chaffey’s planned community called Ontario (Upland Heritage 2023). That same year, after some successful land speculation and having successfully founded the precursor of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, George Chaffey purchased 8,000 acres from the Cucamonga Rancho, developing what would eventually become the city of Ontario. In the process, he constructed Euclid Avenue, and a trolley line, which went to the area now known as Upland (Upland Public Library n.d.).

In 1892, mule-driven street cars pulled trolleys up an 8-mile-long track on a hill, this was later replaced by an electric trolley. By 19222 gasoline motor trucks were running the trolleys in the area (Popular Science 1922). In 1887, the AT&SF railroad selected their route through Upland. The Bedford Brothers built the Upland Railway station on Second Avenue. Numerous fruit packing houses soon sprang up nearby as well.

Farms and houses near the railway station sprang up, as it allowed workers to commute to Los Angeles, or to ship their produce to large markets in Los Angeles (Upland Heritage 2023).

Page 3531 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 13 March 2023
2023-006

In 1888, Having created the Ontario Fruit Exchange, local resident Charles D. Adams created a new citrus association. Because fruit grown at higher elevations tended to be of better quality, he called the new association “Upland,” marking the first time the area was thus designated (Upland Public Library n.d.b).

The City of Ontario incorporated in 1891, as 0.5 square mile. In 1902, when nearby cities also began to seek incorporation, Ontario attempted to annex a 10-square-mile area, which would cover the Upland railroad station, all the Upland railroad tracks, and the Upland post office. San Bernardino Board of Supervisors held a two-day hearing, deciding that a vote of incorporation for Upland should be undertaken before Ontario was allowed to expand. A vote was held, and Upland was incorporated on May 15, 1906 (Upland Heritage 2023). In 1935 the land originally claimed for annexation by Ontario was annexed by Upland (Upland Heritage 2023).

4.0 METHODS

4.1 Personnel Qualifications
Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) Sonia Sifuentes, who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historical archaeology, supervised this cultural resource investigation. Associate Archaeologist Julian Acuña, RPA conducted the fieldwork. Associate Archaeologist Evelyn Hildebrand, RPA prepared the technical report. Lisa Westwood, RPA provided technical report review and quality assurance.

Sonia Sifuentes, RPA is a Senior Archaeologist with more than 15 years of experience in cultural resources management, primarily in Southern California. Ms. Sifuentes holds an M.S. in Archaeology of the North and meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology. She has participated in and supervised numerous surveys, test programs, data recovery excavations, and construction monitoring compliance for both prehistoric and historical sites; and has cataloged, identified, and curated thousands of artifacts. She has conducted evaluations of cultural resources for eligibility for the NRHP and CRHR. Ms. Sifuentes is experienced in the organization and execution of field projects in compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA and CEQA. She has contributed to and authored numerous cultural resources technical reports, research designs, and cultural resources management plans.

Julian Acuña, RPA is an Associate Archaeologist with more than 6 years of experience in cultural resources management. Mr. Acuña holds an M.A. in Applied Archaeology and a B.A. Cum Laude in Anthropology. He meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology. He has participated in various aspects of archaeological fieldwork including survey, test excavations, construction monitoring, the recording of both pre-contact and historic-period archaeological sites, and laboratory work for the analysis and cataloging of artifacts from multi- component sites.

Evelyn Hildebrand, RPA is an Associate Archaeologist with more than 5 years of experience working in cultural resource management across Southern California. She holds a B.A. in Anthropology with a focused curriculum in archaeology and an M.A. in Applied Archaeology. Ms. Hildebrand meets the

Page 3532 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 14 March 2023
2023-006

Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology and has participated in various aspects of archaeological fieldwork including survey, test excavation, data recovery, artifact analysis, construction monitoring, both as an archaeological monitor and field lead, and the recording and recovery of pre-contact and historic-period archaeological sites. She has also worked with Egypt’s department of Antiquities in collaboration with the Wadi el-Hudi expedition in 2019 in the desert southeast of Aswan, Egypt using photogrammetry to record and create digital 3D models of sites.

Lisa Westwood, RPA has 27 years of experience and meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for prehistoric and historical archaeology. She holds a B.A. in Anthropology and an M.A. in Anthropology (Archaeology). She is the Director of Cultural Resources for ECORP.

4.2 Records Search Methods
ECORP conducted a records search for the property at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the CHRIS at California State University, Fullerton on February 6, 2023 (Appendix A). The purpose of the records search was to determine the extent of previous surveys within a 1-mile (1,600- meter) radius of the Proposed Project location, and whether previously documented pre-contact or historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, or traditional cultural properties exist within this area.

In addition to the official records and maps for archaeological sites and surveys in San Bernardino County, the following historic references were also reviewed: Built Environment Resource Directory (OHP 2020); Historic Property Data File for San Bernardino County (OHP 2012); the National Register Information System (National Park Service [NPS] 2023); Office of Historic Preservation, California Historical Landmarks (CHL; OHP 2022); CHL (OHP 1996 and updates); California Points of Historical Interest (OHP 1992 and updates); Directory of Properties in the Historical Resources Inventory (OHP 1999); Caltrans Local Bridge Survey (California Department of Transportation [Caltrans] 2019); Caltrans State Bridge Survey (Caltrans 2018); and Historic Spots in California (Kyle 2002).

Other references examined include a RealQuest Property Search and historic General Land Office land patent records (Bureau of Land Management 2023). Historic maps reviewed include:
 1897 USGS Cucamonga, California topographic quadrangle map (1:1,000 scale);  1942 USGS Ontario and Vicinity, California topographic quadrangle map (1:31,680 scale);  1954 USGS Ontario, California topographic quadrangle map (1:24,000 scale); and  1967 USGS Ontario, California topographic quadrangle map (1:24,000 scale).

ECORP reviewed historic aerial photographs taken in 1938, 1948, 1959, 1966, 1978, 1985, 1994, and 2010 for any indications of property usage and built environment.

4.3 Sacred Lands File Coordination Methods
In addition to the records search, ECORP contacted the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on January 30, 2023 to request a search of the Sacred Lands File for the Project Area (Appendix B).

This search determines whether California Native American tribes within the Project Area have recorded

Page 3533 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 15 March 2023
2023-006

Sacred Lands, because the Sacred Lands File is populated by members of the Native American community with knowledge about the locations of tribal resources. In requesting a search of the Sacred Lands File, ECORP solicited information from the Native American community regarding TCRs, but the responsibility to formally consult with the Native American community lies exclusively with the federal and local agencies under applicable state and federal laws. The lead agencies do not delegate government-to- government authority to any private entity to conduct tribal consultation.

4.4 Other Interested Party Consultation Methods
ECORP mailed letters to the Upland Heritage Society on January 9, 2023 to solicit comments or obtain historical information that the repository might have regarding events, people, or resources of historical significance in the area (Appendix A).

4.5 Field Methods
ECORP subjected the APE to an intensive pedestrian survey on February 14, 2023 under the guidance of the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Identification of Historic Properties (NPS 1983) using 15- meter transects. ECORP expended 1 person-day in the field. ECORP examined the ground surface for indications of surface or subsurface cultural resources and inspected the general morphological characteristics of the ground surface for indications of subsurface deposits that may be manifested on the surface, such as circular depressions or ditches. Whenever possible, ECORP examined the locations of subsurface exposures caused by such factors as rodent activity, water or soil erosion, or vegetation disturbances for artifacts or for indications of buried deposits. ECORP did not conduct subsurface investigations or artifact collections during the pedestrian survey.

Standard professional practice requires that all cultural resources encountered during the survey be recorded using Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) 523-series forms approved by the California OHP. The resources are usually photographed, mapped using a handheld Global Positioning System receiver, and sketched as necessary to document their presence using appropriate DPR forms.

5.0 RESULTS

5.1 Records Search
The records search consisted of a review of previous research and literature, records on file with the SCCIC for previously recorded resources, and historical aerial photographs and maps of the vicinity.

5.1.1 Previous Research
Forty-nine previous cultural resource investigations have been conducted within 1 mile of the property, covering approximately 80 percent of the total area surrounding the property within the records search radius (Appendix A). Of the 49 studies, three overlap with the Project Area (Table 1). One of these reports, completed in 2018 by Garfinkel and Landa, was provided separately from the CHRIS search. Appendix A provides a list of the reports located within 1 mile of the Project Area, in addition to the 2018 report provided ECORP which was not included in the CHRIS results. These studies revealed the presence of pre-

Page 3534 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 16 March 2023
2023-006

contact sites, including lithic scatters and habitation sites, and historical sites, including lithic scatters and sites associated with historic early buildings and agriculture activities. The previous studies were conducted between 1973 and 2018 and vary in size from 8 to 180 acres.

Table 1. Previous Cultural Studies within the Project Area Report
Number Author(s) Report Title Year
SB-00702 Archaeological Associates Archaeological Survey Report: Ultrasystems Project #4426 1978 SB-06667 Encarnacion, Deirdre
Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties: Northwest Recycled Water System Project, Cities of Rancho Cucamonga, Upland and Ontario, San Bernardino County, California
2009
NA Garfinkel & Landa Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment for A proposed commercial development on 10-Acre site in the city of Upland, San Bernardino County, California 2018 The results of the records search indicate that approximately 80 percent of the Project Area has been previously surveyed for cultural resources; however, these studies were conducted in smaller segments, at different times, by different consultants, and as many as 45 years ago under obsolete standards.

Therefore, ECORP conducted a pedestrian survey of the Project Area for the Project under current protocols.

The records search also determined that 37 previously recorded pre-contact and historic-era cultural resources are located within 1 mile of the Project Area. Of these, nine are believed to be associated with Native American occupation of the vicinity, and 28 are historic-era sites, associated with early buildings and structures including adobes, inns and restaurants, and citrus agriculture and early roads. There are no previously recorded cultural resources within the Project Area.

5.1.2 Records
The OHP’s Built Environment Resource Directory for San Bernardino County (dated March 3, 2020) listed two properties within 1 mile of the Project Area (OHP 2020). None are within the Project Area.

The National Register Information System (NPS 2023) failed to reveal any eligible or listed properties within the Project Area. The nearest National Register properties are located 2 miles northwest of the Project Area in the City of Upland, California. None are within the Project Area.

ECORP reviewed resources listed as California Historical Landmarks (OHP 1996) by the OHP (2022) on February 13, 2023. The nearest listed landmark is #1028: the Madonna of the Trail in California (plaque located 1.25 miles southwest of the Project Area). None are within the Project Area.

A review of Historic Spots in California (Kyle 2002) mentions four trails that once crossed what is now Euclid Avenue, which is a long tree-lined drive that extends north and south through the modern cities of

Page 3535 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 17 March 2023
2023-006

Ontario and Upland. It also mentions the Madonna of the Trail, which is now a monument. None are within the Project Area.

A RealQuest online property search for Assessor Parcel Number 1045-121-04-0000 revealed the property consists of 9.13 acres of vacant land. No other property history information was on record with RealQuest.

The Caltrans Bridge Local Inventory (Caltrans 2019) listed one historic-period bridge within 1 mile of the Project Area. Local bridge #54C0222, named Cucamonga Creek Channel, is located 0.72 mile northeast of the Project Area. It was constructed in 1973 and was evaluated by Caltrans as a Category 5 bridge, not eligible for the NRHP under Criterion C. The State Inventory (Caltrans 2018) did not list any historic bridges within 1 mile of the Project Area.

5.1.3 Map Review and Aerial Photographs
The review of historical aerial photographs and maps of the Project Area provides information on the past land uses of the property and potential for buried archaeological sites. This information shows the property was left vacant and unused. Following is a summary of the review of historical maps and photographs.
 The 1897 USGS Cucamonga, California topographic quadrangle map (1:1,000 scale) depicts the Project Area as vacant land with no development surrounding it.  1942 USGS Ontario and Vicinity, California topographic quadrangle map (1:31,680 scale) depicts the Project Area as vacant land on a hillside with a downward north-to-south slope and undeveloped land around it.
 1954 USGS Ontario, California topographic quadrangle map (1:24,000 scale) depicts the Project Area as it is depicted in the 1942 map: vacant land on a slope with undeveloped land around it.  1967 USGS Ontario, California topographic quadrangle map (1:24,000 scale) depicts the Project Area as a percolation basin with development to the southeast.  Aerial photographs from 1938 and 1948 show the Project Area as mostly vacant land with sparse vegetation. Dirt roads are visible running in east–west directions across the western side of the Project Area without a pond. A cluster of trees is in the southeast portion of the Project Area and a square grid of unknown crops is in the northeastern portion.  Aerial photographs from 1959 and 1966 show housing development to the south of the Project Area, while the project area remains undeveloped as in the previous photographs.  Aerial photographs from 1978 and 1980 show additional housing development south of the Project Area and further west than in previous photographs. The Project Area remains unchanged.  The aerial photograph from 1985 shows the Project Area has been modified to its current percolation basin configuration. Housing and road development are visible to the north of the Project Area.

Page 3536 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 18 March 2023
2023-006

 The aerial photographs from 1994, 2002, 2005, and 2010 show the Project Area in its current state as a percolation basin and cleared land that stretches east to west.

In sum, the property has been undeveloped and vacant from at least 1897 to between 1954 and 1967.

After 1954, the property had been modified into a percolation basin, and that the housing development was constructed to the north of the Project Area. Later, the Project Area modified into its current green space landscaped design between 1980 and 1985.

5.2 Sacred Lands File Results
A search of the Sacred Lands File by the NAHC resulted in a negative indication for the presence of Native American cultural resources in the Project Area. A record of all correspondence is provided in Appendix B.

5.3 Other Interested Party Consultation Results
ECORP has not received any responses to the letters sent to the Upland Heritage Historical Society as of the date of the preparation of this document.

5.4 Field Survey Results
ECORP surveyed the Project Area for cultural resources on February 14, 2023. Ground conditions were poor to fair and visibility ranged from 5 to 75 percent (Figures 2 and 3). Most of the Project Area was covered with vegetation, with the densest areas on the slopes of the southern access road/embankment and along the northern Project boundary (Figure 4). ECORP observed the presence of the percolation basin as configured in the 1985 aerial photograph. The bottom of the percolation basin is relatively flat, covered in low vegetation, and portions have standing water (Figure 3); three modern drainages are located on the northern and eastern boundaries.

ECORP did not observe archaeological resources during the survey. Project Area conditions appear unchanged since the 2018 survey conducted by Garfinkle and Landa.

Page 3537 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 19 March 2023
2023-006

Figure 2. APE Overview (view north; February 14, 2023).

Figure 3. APE Overview (view west; February 14, 2023).

Page 3538 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 20 March 2023
2023-006

Figure 4. 15th Street (view southwest; February 14, 2023).

Page 3539 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 21 March 2023
2023-006

6.0 MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS

6.1 Conclusions
ECORP did not identify any archaeological resources within the Project Area as a result of the records search and field survey. Until the lead agencies concur with the identification and evaluation of eligibility of cultural resources, no Project activity should occur.

6.2 Likelihood for Subsurface Cultural Resources
Due to the amount of heavy disturbance within the Project Area caused by the construction of the basin, and due to the negative survey results, there exists a low potential for buried pre-contact archaeological sites in the Project Area.

6.3 Post-Review Discoveries
There always remains the potential for ground-disturbing activities to expose previously unrecorded cultural resources. Both CEQA and Section 106 of the NHPA require the lead agency to address any unanticipated cultural resource discoveries during Project construction. Therefore, ECORP recommends the lead agency adopt and implement the following mitigation measures to reduce potential adverse impacts to Less than Significant:
 If subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery. A qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for prehistoric and historic archaeology, shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no-work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. The following notifications shall apply, depending on the nature of the find:
• If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does not represent a cultural resource, work may resume immediately and no agency notifications are required. • If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does represent a cultural resource from any time period or cultural affiliation, the archaeologist shall immediately notify the lead agencies. The agencies shall consult on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines or a historic property under Section 106 NHPA, if applicable. Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agencies, through consultation as appropriate, determine that the site either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA or a Historic Property under Section 106; or 2) that the treatment measures have been completed to their satisfaction.
• If the find includes human remains, or remains that are potentially human, they shall ensure reasonable protection measures are taken to protect the discovery from disturbance (AB 2641). The archaeologist shall notify the San Bernardino County Coroner (per Section 7050.5

Page 3540 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 22 March 2023
2023-006

of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.98 of the California PRC, and AB 2641 will be implemented. If the coroner determines the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene, the coroner will notify the NAHC, which then will designate a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the Project (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains. If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (Section 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (Section 5097.98 of the PRC). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a reinternment document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agencies, through consultation as appropriate, determine that the treatment measures have been completed to their satisfaction.

The Lead Agency is responsible for ensuring compliance with these mitigation measures. Section 15097 of Title 14, Chapter 3, Article 7 of CEQA, Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting, “The public agency shall adopt a program for monitoring or reporting on the revisions which it has required in the project and the measures it has imposed to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects. A public agency may delegate reporting or monitoring responsibilities to another public agency or to a private entity which accepts the delegation; however, until mitigation measures have been completed the lead agency remains responsible for ensuring that implementation of the mitigation measures occurs in accordance with the program.”

Page 3541 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 23 March 2023
2023-006

7.0 REFERENCES CITED
Aviña, Rose H. 1976. Spanish and Mexican Land Grants in California. Arno Press, New York.

Basgall, Mark E. 1987. Resource Intensification Among Hunter-Gatherers: Acorn Economies in Prehistoric California. Research in Economic Anthropology 9:21-52.

Bean, Lowell J. and Charles R. Smith. 1978. Gabrielino. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 538-549. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.

Binford, Lewis R. 1980 “Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems and Archaeological Site Formation.” American Antiquity, vol. 45, no. 1, 1980, pp. 4–20.

Bureau of Land Management. 2023. Bureau of Land Management, General Land Office Records, Records Automation website. http://www.glorecords.blm.gov/ . Accessed February 13, 2023.

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2019. Structure and Maintenance & Investigations, Historical Significance–Local Agency Bridges Database.
_____. 2019. Structure and Maintenance & Investigations, Historical Significance–State Agency Bridges Database 2019.

California Genealogy. 2008. San Bernardino City History, California Genealogy. http://www.californiagenealogy.org/sanbernardino/san_bernardino_city_history.htm . Accessed February 13, 2023.

Castillo, Edward D. 1978. The Impact of Euro-American Exploration and Settlement. In Handbook of North American Indians, Volume 8, California, edited by R. F. Heizer, pp. 99-127. Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C.

Erlandson, J. M. 1994. Early Hunter-Gatherers of the California Coast. Plenum Press, New York.

Gallegos, D. 1991. Antiquity and Adaptation at Agua Hedionda, Carlsbad, California. In Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by J. M. Erlandson and R. H. Colten, pp. 19-41.

Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 1. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Goldberg, S. 2001. Eastside Reservoir Project: Final Report of Archaeological Investigations (Five volumes).

Applied Earthworks, Inc., Hemet, California.

Golla, V. 2011. California Indian Languages. University of California Press, Berkeley.

Grenda, D. R. 1997. Continuity and Change: 8,500 Years of Lacustrine Adaptation on the Shores of Lake Elsinore: Archaeological Investigations at a Stratified Site in Southern California. Statistical Research Technical Series No 59. Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson, Arizona.

Gudde, Erwin G. 1969. California Place Names: The Origin and Etymology of Current Geographical Names.

Third Edition. University of California, Berkeley.

Page 3542 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 24 March 2023
2023-006

Koerper, H. C., P. Langenwalter II, and A. Schroth. 1991. Early Holocene Adaptations and the Transition Problem: Evidence from the Allan O. Kelly Site, Agua Hedionda Lagoon. In Hunter-Gatherers of Early Holocene Coastal California, edited by J. M. Erlandson and R. H. Colten, pp. 81-88.

Perspectives in California Archaeology, Volume 1. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.

Kowta 1969. The Sayles Complex. A Late Milling Stone Assemblage from Cajon Pass and the Ecological Implications of Its Scraper Planes. University of California Press.

Kyle, Douglas. 2002. Historic Spots in California. Stanford University Press. Stanford, California.

McCawley, William. 1996. The First Angelinos: the Gabrielino Indians of Los Angeles. Malki Museum Press, Ballena Press, Banning, California.

Miller, Bruce W. 1991. The Gabrielino. Sand River Press, Los Osos, California.

Moratto, M. J. 1984. California Archaeology. Academic Press, Orlando.

National Park Service (NPS). 2023. National Register of Historic Places, Digital Archive on NPGallery. https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP . Accessed February 13, 2023. _____. 1983. Archaeology and Historic Preservation: Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines. 48 Federal Register 44716-68.

Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). 2022. Office of Historic Preservation California Historical Landmarks Website. http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=21387 . Accessed February 13, 2023. _____. 2020. Office of Historic Preservation’s Built Environment Resource Directory, dated March 3, 2020 for San Bernardino County.
_____. 2012. Directory of Properties in the Historic Property Data File for San Bernardino County. _____. 1999. Directory of Properties in the Historical Resources Inventory. _____. 1996. California Historical Landmarks. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California.
_____. 1992. California Points of Historical Interest. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento, California.

Popular Science. October 1922. From Mule to Motor Bus on Street Car Tracks. Popular Science, October 1922. https://books.google.com/books?id=bioDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA61#v=onepage&q&f=false .

Rondeau, M. F., J. Cassidy, and T. L. Jones. 2007. Colonization Technologies: Fluted Projectile Points and the San Clemente Island Woodworking/Microblade Complex. In California Prehistory:

Colonization, Culture, and Complexity, edited by T. L. Jones and K. A. Klar, pp. 299-315. Altamira Press, Lanham, Maryland.

Salls, R. A. 1983. The Liberty Grove Site: Archaeological Interpretation of a Late Milling Stone Horizon Site on the Cucamonga Plain. M.A. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.

Page 3543 of 3744 ends

Archaeological Resources Inventory Report
ECORP Consulting, Inc.

Villa Serena Project 25 March 2023
2023-006

Sutton, M. Q. 2011. The Palomar Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 44(4):1-74.
_____. 2010. The Del Rey Tradition and Its Place in the Prehistory of Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 44(2):1-54.
_____. 2009. People and Language: Defining the Takic Expansion into Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 41(2 and 3):31-93.

Sutton, M. Q. and J. K. Gardner. 2010. Reconceptualizing the Encinitas Tradition of Southern California.

Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 42(4):1-64.

Upland Heritage. 2023. History of Early Upland, https://uplandheritage.org/early-upland . Accessed February 13, 2023.

Upland Public Library. n.d.a. History of Ontario, CA. http://uplandpubliclibrary.blogspot.com/p/history-of- ontario-ca.html. Accessed February 13, 2023.

Upland Public Library. n.d.b. History of Upland, CA. http://uplandpubliclibrary.blogspot.com/p/history-of- upland-ca.html. Accessed February 13, 2023.

Wallace, W. J. 1955. A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11:214-230.

Warren, C. N. 1968. Cultural Tradition and Ecological Adaptation on the Southern California Coast. In Archaic Prehistory in the Western United States, edited by Cynthia Irwin-Williams, pp. 1-14. Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology 1. Portales, New Mexico. _____. 1967. The San Dieguito Complex: a Review and Hypothesis. American Antiquity 32:168-185.

Waugh, M. G. 1986. Intensification and Land-Use: Archaeological Indication of Transition and Transformation in a Late Prehistoric Complex in Southern California. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Davis.

Page 3544 of 3744 ends

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Records Search Confirmation and Historical Society Coordination Appendix B – Sacred Lands File Coordination
Appendix C – Project Area Photographs

Page 3545 of 3744 ends

APPENDIX A
Records Search Confirmation and Historical Society Coordination

Page 3546 of 3744 ends

2023-006 Colonies Partners Upland
Map Date: 1/9/2023
Sources: ESRI, USGS Records Search
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
:

N
:
\
2 0
2 3
\
2 0
2 3
-
0 0
6 C
o
l
o
n
i
e
s

P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s

U
p
l
a
n
d
\
M
A
P
S
\
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
_
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
\
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
_
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
a
p
r
x

C
o
l
o
n
i
e
s
_
R
S
_
C
H
R
I
S

(
t
r
o
t
e
l
l
i
n
i

1 /
9 /
2 0
2 3
)
I 0 1,000 2,000
Scale in Feet
Mount Baldy, CA (1999)
Cucamonga Peak, CA (1996)
Ontario, CA (1978)
Guasti, CA (1978)
CA 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle
US Geological Survey
San Bernardino County, California
Unsectioned Cucamonga Land Grant, SBBM
§#8, T.#01S R.#07W, SBBM
Latitude (NAD83): 34.1184592°N
Longitude (NAD83): 117.6323667°W
Watershed: Santa Ana (#18070203)
Map Features
Project Site - 23.21 Acres
1-mile Buffer

Page 3547 of 3744 ends

Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs SB-00171 1973 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT:

PROPOSED P.U.D., 4 UNITS/ACRE,
CUCAMONGA (85-79), RED HILL

CONDOMINIUM SITE

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
SIMPSON, RUTH and

BETTY MOORE
NADB-R - 1060171;
Voided - 73-7.6
SB-00178 1973 RESOURCE EVALUATION OF SITES

WITHIN CUCAMONGA CREEK DEBRIS
BASIN

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM
SMITH, GERALD A.36-000270, 36-001593, 36-001607NADB-R - 1060178; Voided - 73-8.5
SB-00194 1973 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SURVEY: RED
HILL GREEN TRACT #8884

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
NADB-R - 1060194;
Voided - 73-12.3
SB-00203 1974 CASA DE RANCHO CUCAMONGAARCHER, MORSE G.NADB-R - 1060203; Voided - 74-0.2D
SB-00265 1975 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION:

ARCHAEOLOGY OF PROPOSED

ADDITIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS IN

CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT, UCR
WEAVER, RICHARD A.NADB-R - 1060265;
Voided - 75-10.1
SB-00276 1975 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS,

ARCHAEOLOGICAL VALUES, THE LAND

DEVELOPING FIRM OF CROWELL AND
LEVANTHAL, TRACT 9157 - CUCAMONGA

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
36-000902NADB-R - 1060276;
Voided - 75-12.3
SB-00302 1976 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:

ARCHAEOLOGICAL VALUES, FIRM OF
LAKEWOOD ENGINEERING, TRACTS 9167
AND 9193 - CUCAMONGA

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
36-000901NADB-R - 1060302;
Voided - 76-2.4
SB-00316 1976 ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL

RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, TRACTS
9193 AND 9262, CUCAMONGA

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
HARRIS, RUTH D.36-000901NADB-R - 1060316;
Voided - 76-4.1
SB-00318 1982 THE CHAFFEY HILLSIDE SITE, CA-SBR-
895; REPORT ON THE CULTURAL

RESOURCE MITIGATION PROGRAM

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCE

MANAGEMENT

CORPORATION
ALLEN, LAWRENCE P.36-000895NADB-R - 1060318;
Voided - 76-4.2A
SB-00433 1976 ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL

RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF
TENTATIVE TRACT 9589 LOCATED ON

RED HILL IN CUCAMONGA

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
HEARN, JOSEPH E.NADB-R - 1060433;
Voided - 76-11.3
SB-00545 1977 ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL

RESOURCES EVALUATION OF VINEYARD

PARK PROJECT, ALTA LOMA AREA

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
HEARN, JOSEPH E.NADB-R - 1060545;
Voided - 77-8.15

Page 1 of 5 ends

Page 3548 of 3744 ends

Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs SB-00606 1978 ARCHAEOLOGICAL - HISTORICAL

RESOURCES ASSESSMENT OF A
PORTION OF LOT 1, CUCAMONGA
VINEYARD TRACT SUBDIVISION "C"; ALTA

LOMA AREA OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

SAN BERNARDINO

COUNTY MUSEUM

ASSOCIATION
HEARN, JOSEPH E.36-000902NADB-R - 1060606;
Voided - 78-2.1
SB-00642 1977 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT EVALUATION:

TEST EXCAVATION AT BASE LINE -

CARNELIAN STREET TO VINEYARD

AVENUE, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT, UCR
WEAVER, RICHARD A.36-000901, 36-000902NADB-R - 1060642; Voided - 78-5.3A
SB-00643 1978 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT EVALUATION:

TEST EXCAVATIONS AT SBR-902,

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT, UCR
LIPP, DONALD 36-000902NADB-R - 1060643;
Voided - 78-5.3B
SB-00702 1978 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT:

ULTRASYSTEMS PROJECT #4426

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
NADB-R - 1060702;
Voided - 78-11.5
SB-00806 1979 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION:

AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

BOTH SIDES OF SIXTEENTH STREET
(BASELINE) IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESEARCH UNIT, UCR
WILMOTH, STANNADB-R - 1060806;
Voided - 79-7.1
SB-01595 1986 CULTURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT

OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF
CAMPUS AVENUE BETWEEN 19TH
STREET AND 22ND STREET, CITY OF

UPLAND, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA
BISSELL, RONALD M.NADB-R - 1061595;
Voided - 86-10.3
SB-01660 1987 CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL

RESOURCE INVESTIGATIONS OF THE

LAKES AT SAN ANTONIO PROJECT, CITY

OF UPLAND, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,

CALIFORNIA

SCIENTIFIC RESOURCE

SURVEYS
GROSS, LORRAINE S.,
KEVIN J. PETER, and
WILLIAM B. GILMOUR
NADB-R - 1061660;
Voided - 87-3.14
SB-02059 1990 COMPENDIUM OF RESULTS OF OBSIDIAN
STUDIES FOR STUDY AREA SITES:

APPENDIX TO PREHISTORIC SITES IN
THE PRADO BASIN, CALIFORNIA:

REGIONAL CONTEXT AND SIGNIFICANCE

EVALUATION
INFOTECINFOTEC RESEARCH 36-000270, 36-000895, 36-000901, 36-001000, 36-001543, 36-003690,
36-004032, 36-005245
NADB-R - 1062059;
Voided - 90-1.6
SB-02070 1990 REPORT ON TRIP TO RAINS HOUSERECTOR, CAROLNADB-R - 1062070; Voided - 90-2.3

Page 2 of 5 ends

Page 3549 of 3744 ends

Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs SB-02086 1990 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF

THE SYCAMORE VILLAGE PROJECT SITE,

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT CORP.

DEL CHARIO,
KATHLEEN C.

NADB-R - 1062086;
Voided - 90-5.4
SB-02101 1990 AN HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE

SYCAMORE VILLAGE PROJECT SITE,

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT CORP.

VAN WORMER,
STEPHEN R.

NADB-R - 1062101;
Voided - 90-5.5
SB-02266 1991 REVISION AND DISCOVERY IN A MILLING

STONE HORIZON CONTEXT
Pomona CollegeDONNELLY, CORDY 36-000342, 36-000421, 36-000713, 36-000895, 36-000901, 36-001543,
36-005243
NADB-R - 1062266;
Voided - 91-0.1
SB-02290 1991 PRELIMINARY HISTORIC PROPERTY

SURVEY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED

WIDENING OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD

BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND LION

STREET, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY

HATHEWAY AND

ASSOCIATES
HATHEWAY, ROGER G.
and JOHN F. ROMANI
NADB-R - 1062290;
Voided - 91-2.16
SB-02293 1985 THE SCRAPER PLANE: A FUNCTIONAL

INTERPRETATION

JOURNAL OF FIELD
ARCHAEOLOGY 12 (1):99-
106
SALLS, ROY A.36-000901NADB-R - 1062293;
Voided - 85-0.4
SB-02294 1990 CONCERNING WILLIAM FOLAN'S

SCRAPER PLANES

JOURNAL OF FIELD
ARCHAEOLOGY 17
(2):245-245
SALLS, ROY A.36-000901NADB-R - 1062294;
Voided - 90-0.6
SB-02444 1991 PROVENIENCE LOG FOR THE SBCM HA1

ASSEMBLAGE

CHAFFEY COLLEGE,

SOCIAL SCIENCE

DIVISION

MCALLISTER, BERNICE
LYONS
NADB-R - 1062444;
Voided - 91-8.1
SB-02537 1988 OBSIDIAN DATING OF THE LIBERTY

GROVE SITE WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR

SASSON AND CHAFFEY HILLSIDE

ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
SALLS, ROY A.36-000895, 36-000901NADB-R - 1062537;
Voided - 88-0.10
SB-02561 1983 THE LIBERTY GROVE SITE:

ARCHAEOLOGICAL INTERPRETATIONS

OF A LATE MILLINGSTONE SITE ON THE

CUCAMONGA PLAIN
SALLS, ROY 36-000901NADB-R - 1062561;
Voided - 83-4.14
SB-02763 1993 URBAN HISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL

AND ARCHITECTURAL INVESTIGATIONS
AT FOOTHILL BLVD. & VINEYARD AVE.,

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY

OF SAN BERNARDINO, CA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

CONSULTING SERVICES
ALEXANDROWICZ, J.

STEPHEN, ANNE
DUFFIELD-STOLL, and
SUSAN R.

ALEXANDROWICZ
36-007351, 36-007395, 36-007396,
36-007397, 36-007398
NADB-R - 1062763

Page 3 of 5 ends

Page 3550 of 3744 ends

Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs SB-02940 1993 HISTORICAL PROPERTY SURVEY

REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED WIDENING
OF FOOTHILL BLVD., BETWEEN GROVE
AVE AND LION ST., IN THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN

BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

ASSOCIATES
36-000897NADB-R - 1062940
SB-03082 1976 FAUNAL ANALYSIS OF 4 EXCAVATION
UNITS AT SBCM-133
IRVINE, KENNETH C.36-000270NADB-R - 1063082
SB-03567 2001 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY
OF SB54XC412 CELL TOWER SITE,

UPLAND MEMORIAL PARK, CITY OF
UPLAND, CA. 9PP
JENSEN & ASSOCIATESJENSEN, PETERNADB-R - 1063567
SB-03568 1979 EUCLID AVE. TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT M-5083 INFORMATIONAL
REPORT ON EFFECTS SEC 106-HISTORIC
PRESERVATION ACT. 75PP
KING, L.D.36-002910, 36-018222, 36-018593,
36-018594, 36-018596, 36-018598,
36-018600, 36-018602, 36-018603,
36-018604
NADB-R - 1063568
SB-03571 2000 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT
FOR PBMS FACILITY CM 354-01, COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 4PP
LSALAPIN, PHILLIPENADB-R - 1063571
SB-03577 2000 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT
FOR PBW VACILITY CM 233-01, SAN
BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA. 6PP
LSALAPIN, PHILLIPENADB-R - 1063577
SB-03582 2000 RESULTS OF THE CULTURAL RESOURCE

RECORD SEARCH AND EXTENDED
SURVEY FOR PBMS FACILITY CM 354-01,
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA. 14PP
LSADUKE, CURTNADB-R - 1063582
SB-03593 1998 HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY AT EL

RANCHO DE CUCAMONGA, CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN
BERNARDINO CO, CA 2 VOL. 560PP

ACSALEXANROWICZ, JOHN
STEPHEN, S.

ALEXANDROWICZ, D.

WROBLESKI, R.

KRAMER, A. STOLL,
and T. BELL
36-007351, 36-007396, 36-007397,
36-007398
NADB-R - 1063593
SB-04033 2001 PROPOSED WIRELESS DEVICE

MONOPOLE & EQUIPMENT CABINET SITE,
8248 19TH ST, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
CA. 9PP
TETRA TECHBUDINGER, FREDNADB-R - 1064033
SB-04162 2002 CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT:

AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES FACILITY NO.

D121, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CA.
9PP
LSADUKE, CURTNADB-R - 1064162

Page 4 of 5 ends

Page 3551 of 3744 ends

Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs SB-04508 2005 STROKES/CA-8584B. 16PP EARTHTOUCH, LLCTHAL, SEAN M.NADB-R - 1064508 SB-05358 1976 Cucamonga Creek 1776-1976 After 200
Years.

Sider, W.A.NADB-R - 1065358
SB-05489
SB-05499 2003 Historic Resources Compliance Report for
the Relinquishment of State Route 66, City of
Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County,
California.

Hammond, Stephen R.
and David Bricker
36-002910NADB-R - 1065499
SB-05638
SB-06083 2008 Bechtel Wireless Telecommunications Site
ES0258 (Upland Water Tanks) located at 580
East 15th Street, Upland California 91785
C.A.R.E.Wlodarski, Robert J.

SB-06666 2009 Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties: Northwest Recycled Water
System Project, Cities of Rancho
Cucamonga, Upland and Ontario, San
Bernardino County, California.

Encarnacion, DeirdreNADB-R - 1066666
SB-06667 2009 Identification and Evaluation of Historic Properties: Northwest Recycled Water
System Project, Cities of Rancho
Cucamonga, Upland and Ontario, San
Bernardino County, California.

CRM TECHEncarnacion, DeirdreNADB-R - 1066667
SB-07448

Page 5 of 5 ends

Page 3552 of 3744 ends

Page 3553 of 3744 ends

Page 3554 of 3744 ends

Page 3555 of 3744 ends

Page 3556 of 3744 ends

Page 3557 of 3744 ends

Page 3558 of 3744 ends

Page 3559 of 3744 ends

Page 3560 of 3744 ends

Page 3561 of 3744 ends

Page 3562 of 3744 ends

Page 3563 of 3744 ends

Page 3564 of 3744 ends

Page 3565 of 3744 ends

Page 3566 of 3744 ends

Page 3567 of 3744 ends

Page 3568 of 3744 ends

Page 3569 of 3744 ends

Page 3570 of 3744 ends

Page 3571 of 3744 ends

Page 3572 of 3744 ends

Page 3573 of 3744 ends

Page 3574 of 3744 ends

Page 3575 of 3744 ends

Page 3576 of 3744 ends

Page 3577 of 3744 ends

Page 3578 of 3744 ends

Page 3579 of 3744 ends

Page 3580 of 3744 ends

Page 3581 of 3744 ends

Page 3582 of 3744 ends

Page 3583 of 3744 ends

Page 3584 of 3744 ends

Page 3585 of 3744 ends

Page 3586 of 3744 ends

Page 3587 of 3744 ends

Page 3588 of 3744 ends

Page 3589 of 3744 ends

Page 3590 of 3744 ends

Page 3591 of 3744 ends

Page 3592 of 3744 ends

Page 3593 of 3744 ends

Page 3594 of 3744 ends

Page 3595 of 3744 ends

Page 3596 of 3744 ends

Page 3597 of 3744 ends

Page 3598 of 3744 ends

Page 3599 of 3744 ends

Page 3600 of 3744 ends

Page 3601 of 3744 ends

Page 3602 of 3744 ends

Page 3603 of 3744 ends

Page 3604 of 3744 ends

Page 3605 of 3744 ends

Page 3606 of 3744 ends

Page 3607 of 3744 ends

Page 3608 of 3744 ends

Page 3609 of 3744 ends

Page 3610 of 3744 ends

Page 3611 of 3744 ends

1/9/23, 4:38 PM Upland Heritage
https://uplandheritage.org/contact-us 1/2
Upland Heritage P.O. Box 1828 Upland, CA 91785 US
(909) 981-0280
Upland Heritage "Making a Di erence Preserving
Upland History Since 1989"
Thank you for your inquiry! We will get back to you within 48 hours.

UPLAND HERITAGE
P.O. Box 1828Upland, CA 91785US
(909) 981-0280
Today Closed
Board Meetings are held the 3rd Thursday of every month, except in July, August and December, at 7 pm at the Cooper Museum in Downtown Upland. Please feel free to join us and join in on the fun!
Contact Us

Page 3612 of 3744 ends

1/9/23, 4:38 PM Upland Heritage
https://uplandheritage.org/contact-us 2/2
Copyright © 2022 Upland Heritage - All Rights Reserved.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

Page 3613 of 3744 ends

1 Michael DeGiovine
From:Sonia Sifuentes
Sent:Tuesday, January 10, 2023 8:16 AM
To:Upland Heritage
Cc:Evelyn Hildebrand
Subject:RE: Contact Form: Contact Us
Attachments:Colonies_LnV(draft01).pdf
Good morning,

Please see the attached map for the project we reached out to you about, The Colonies Upland. Please let us know if you need any further information from us to help with this request. Thank you!

Sincerely,
Sonia

‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: support=1cee3593‐9fbe‐4b30‐9155‐
7acaab021685.mail.conversations.godaddy.com@mail.conversations.godaddy.com On Behalf Of Upland Heritage Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 8:01 PM
To: Sonia Sifuentes
Subject: Re: Contact Form: Contact Us

Hi, I didn’t see a map attached. Can you send again. Thank you

Page 3614 of 3744 ends

APPENDIX B
Sacred Lands File Coordination

Page 3615 of 3744 ends

Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request Native American Heritage Commission
1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100
West Sacramento, CA 95691
916-373-3710
916-373-5471 – Fax
[email protected]
Information Below is Required for a Sacred Lands File Search Project: _2023-006 Colonies Partners Upland________________________________ County:____________________________________________________________________ USGS Quadrangle Name:_Ontario CA (1978) unsectioned Cucamonga Land Grant, SBBM__ Township:__01S________ Range:_07W_________ Section(s):_8_________ Company/Firm/Agency:__ECORP Consulting Inc._____________________________ Street Address:_215 North 5th Street________________________________________ City:_Redlands_______________________________ Zip:_92374_______________ Phone:_(909) 307-0046____________________________________________ Fax:_(909) 307-0056______________________________________________ Email:[email protected]_____________________________________ Project Description: Proposed residential development in the City of Upland on 10 acres.

Please refer to project number 2023-006 on all correspondence San Bernardino

Page 3616 of 3744 ends

Records Search
2023-006 Colonies Partners Upland

Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
:

N
:
\
2 0
2 3
\
2 0
2 3
-
0 0
6 C
o
l
o
n
i
e
s

P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s

U
p
l
a
n
d
\
M
A
P
S
\
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
_
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
\
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
_
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
a
p
r
x

C
o
l
o
n
i
e
s
_
R
S
_
N
A
H
C

(
t
r
o
t
e
l
l
i
n
i

Page 3617 of 3744 ends

STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor

NATIVE A MERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION

Page 1 of 1 ends

January 30, 2023

Evelyn Hildebrand
ECORP Consulting Inc

Via Email to: [email protected]

Re: 2023-006 Colonies Partners Upland Project, San Bernardino County

Dear Ms. Hildebrand:

A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites.

Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received.

If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance, we can assure that our lists contain current information.

If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: [email protected].

Sincerely,

Cameron Vela
Cultural Resources Analyst

Attachment

CHAIRPERSON
Laura Miranda
Luiseño

VICE CHAIRPERSON
Reginald Pagaling
Chumash

SECRETARY
Sara Dutschke
Miwok

COMMISSIONER
Isaac Bojorquez
Ohlone-Costanoan

COMMISSIONER
Buffy McQuillen
Yokayo Pomo, Yuki,
Nomlaki

COMMISSIONER
Wayne Nelson
Luiseño

COMMISSIONER
Stanley Rodriguez
Kumeyaay

COMMISSIONER
[Vacant]

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY
Raymond C.

Hitchcock
Miwok/Nisenan

NAHC HEADQUARTERS
1550 Harbor Boulevard
Suite 100
West Sacramento,
California 95691
(916) 373-3710
[email protected]
NAHC.ca.gov

Page 3618 of 3744 ends

Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Reid Milanovich, Chairperson
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6800
Fax: (760) 699-6919
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Patricia Garcia-Plotkin, Director
5401 Dinah Shore Drive
Palm Springs, CA, 92264
Phone: (760) 699 - 6907
Fax: (760) 699-6924
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Augustine Band of Cahuilla
Mission Indians
Amanda Vance, Chairperson
84-001 Avenue 54
Coachella, CA, 92236
Phone: (760) 398 - 4722
Fax: (760) 369-7161
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Cabazon Band of Mission
Indians
Doug Welmas, Chairperson
84-245 Indio Springs Parkway
Indio, CA, 92203
Phone: (760) 342 - 2593
Fax: (760) 347-7880
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Cahuilla Band of Indians
Daniel Salgado, Chairperson
52701 U.S. Highway 371
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 5549
Fax: (951) 763-2808
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Gabrieleno Band of Mission
Indians - Kizh Nation
Andrew Salas, Chairperson
P.O. Box 393
Covina, CA, 91723
Phone: (626) 926 - 4131
[email protected]
Gabrieleno
Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel
Band of Mission Indians
Anthony Morales, Chairperson
P.O. Box 693
San Gabriel, CA, 91778
Phone: (626) 483 - 3564
Fax: (626) 286-1262
[email protected]
Gabrieleno
Gabrielino /Tongva Nation
Sandonne Goad, Chairperson
106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St.,
#231
Los Angeles, CA, 90012
Phone: (951) 807 - 0479
[email protected]
Gabrielino
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
Christina Conley, Tribal
Consultant and Administrator
P.O. Box 941078
Simi Valley, CA, 93094
Phone: (626) 407 - 8761
[email protected]
u
Gabrielino
Gabrielino Tongva Indians of
California Tribal Council
Robert Dorame, Chairperson
P.O. Box 490
Bellflower, CA, 90707
Phone: (562) 761 - 6417
Fax: (562) 761-6417
[email protected]
Gabrielino
Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe
Charles Alvarez,
23454 Vanowen Street
West Hills, CA, 91307
Phone: (310) 403 - 6048
[email protected]
Gabrielino
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians Acjachemen Nation -
Belardes
Matias Belardes, Chairperson
32161 Avenida Los Amigos
San Juan Capisttrano, CA, 92675
Phone: (949) 293 - 8522
[email protected]
Juaneno
1 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed 2023-006 Colonies Partners Upland Project, San Bernardino County.

PROJ-2023-
000410
01/30/2023 11:07 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
San Bernardino County
1/30/2023

Page 3619 of 3744 ends

Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians Acjachemen Nation -
Belardes
Joyce Perry, Tribal Manager
4955 Paseo Segovia
Irvine, CA, 92603
Phone: (949) 293 - 8522
[email protected]
Juaneno
Juaneno Band of Mission
Indians Acjachemen Nation 84A
Heidi Lucero, Chairperson
31411-A La Matanza Street
San Juan Capistrano, CA, 92675
Phone: (562) 879 - 2884
[email protected]
Juaneno
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla
and Cupeño Indians
Ray Chapparosa, Chairperson
P.O. Box 189
Warner Springs, CA, 92086-0189
Phone: (760) 782 - 0711
Fax: (760) 782-0712
Cahuilla
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Ann Brierty, THPO
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA, 92220
Phone: (951) 755 - 5259
Fax: (951) 572-6004
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Serrano
Morongo Band of Mission
Indians
Robert Martin, Chairperson
12700 Pumarra Road
Banning, CA, 92220
Phone: (951) 755 - 5110
Fax: (951) 755-5177
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Serrano
Pala Band of Mission Indians
Shasta Gaughen, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
PMB 50, 35008 Pala Temecula
Rd.

Pala, CA, 92059
Phone: (760) 891 - 3515
Fax: (760) 742-3189
[email protected]
Cupeno
Luiseno
Pechanga Band of Indians
Paul Macarro, Cultural Resources
Coordinator
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6306
Fax: (951) 506-9491
[email protected]
Luiseno
Pechanga Band of Indians
Mark Macarro, Chairperson
P.O. Box 1477
Temecula, CA, 92593
Phone: (951) 770 - 6000
Fax: (951) 695-1778
[email protected]
Luiseno
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
Manfred Scott, Acting Chairman
Kw'ts'an Cultural Committee
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Phone: (928) 750 - 2516
[email protected]
Quechan
Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma
Reservation
Jill McCormick, Historic
Preservation Officer
P.O. Box 1899
Yuma, AZ, 85366
Phone: (760) 572 - 2423
historicpreservation@quechantrib
e.com
Quechan
2 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed 2023-006 Colonies Partners Upland Project, San Bernardino County.

PROJ-2023-
000410
01/30/2023 11:07 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
San Bernardino County
1/30/2023

Page 3620 of 3744 ends

Ramona Band of Cahuilla
Joseph Hamilton, Chairperson
P.O. Box 391670
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 4105
Fax: (951) 763-4325
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Ramona Band of Cahuilla
John Gomez, Environmental
Coordinator
P. O. Box 391670
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 763 - 4105
Fax: (951) 763-4325
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Bo Mazzetti, Chairperson
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 749 - 1051
Fax: (760) 749-5144
[email protected]
Luiseno
Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians
Cheryl Madrigal, Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer
One Government Center Lane
Valley Center, CA, 92082
Phone: (760) 297 - 2635
[email protected]
Luiseno
San Manuel Band of Mission
Indians
Jessica Mauck, Director of
Cultural Resources
26569 Community Center Drive
Highland, CA, 92346
Phone: (909) 864 - 8933
Jessica.Mauck@sanmanuel-
nsn.gov
Serrano
Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla
Indians
Lovina Redner, Tribal Chair
P.O. Box 391820
Anza, CA, 92539
Phone: (951) 659 - 2700
Fax: (951) 659-2228
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Serrano Nation of Mission
Indians
Wayne Walker, Co-Chairperson
P. O. Box 343
Patton, CA, 92369
Phone: (253) 370 - 0167
[email protected]
Serrano
Serrano Nation of Mission
Indians
Mark Cochrane, Co-Chairperson
P. O. Box 343
Patton, CA, 92369
Phone: (909) 528 - 9032
[email protected]
Serrano
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Isaiah Vivanco, Chairperson
P. O. Box 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 654 - 5544
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Soboba Band of Luiseno
Indians
Joseph Ontiveros, Cultural
Resource Department
P.O. BOX 487
San Jacinto, CA, 92581
Phone: (951) 663 - 5279
Fax: (951) 654-4198
[email protected]
Cahuilla
Luiseno
Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla
Indians
Cultural Committee,
P.O. Box 1160
Thermal, CA, 92274
Phone: (760) 397 - 0300
Fax: (760) 397-8146
Cultural-
Committee@torresmartinez-
nsn.gov
Cahuilla
3 of 3
This list is current only as of the date of this document. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resource Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code.

This list is only applicable for contacting local Native Americans with regard to cultural resources assessment for the proposed 2023-006 Colonies Partners Upland Project, San Bernardino County.

PROJ-2023-
000410
01/30/2023 11:07 AM
Native American Heritage Commission
Native American Contact List
San Bernardino County
1/30/2023

Page 3621 of 3744 ends

APPENDIX C
Project Area Photographs

Page 3622 of 3744 ends

PHOTOLOG Project Name:Upland Colonies
Project Number:2023-006

Project Number:

Camera Photo
No.

Description Facing Date Initials
Samsung 082115 Project addition from southwest corner East 2/14/23 JEA 082136 Project south access road East 2/14/23 JEA
082215 Ground conditions south boundary Detail 2/14/23 JEA 082804 Ground conditions south boundary Detail 2/14/23 JEA 083514 Project east boundary North 2/14/23 JEA
083518 Project from southeast corner Northwest 2/14/23 JEA 085205 Modern drainage center project North 2/14/23 JEA 085408 Ground conditions north boundary West 2/14/23 JEA 085946 Modern drainage northeast corner Northeast 2/14/23 JEA 092418 Project from northeast corner Southwest 2/14/23 JEA 092447 Northeast drainage Northeast 2/14/23 JEA
092454 Project north boundary West 2/14/23 JEA
093942 Field check area southwest corner Southeast 2/14/23 JEA 094028 Field check area center basin East 2/14/23 JEA
094032 Field check area from northwest corner Northeast 2/14/23 JEA 094115 Field check area, west portion on 15th street Southwest 2/14/23 JEA

Page 3623 of 3744 ends

Page 3624 of 3744 ends

Page 3625 of 3744 ends

Page 3626 of 3744 ends

Page 3627 of 3744 ends

Page 3628 of 3744 ends

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

INLAND DESERTS REGION
3602 INLAND EMPIRE BLVD., SUITE C-220
ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA, 91764

STREAMBED ALTERATION AGREEMENT
EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
15th Street Catch Basin

DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC

VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN

This Streambed Alteration Agreement (Agreement) is entered into between the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and Diversified Pacific (Permittee) as represented by Mr. Brian Bush.

RECITALS
WHEREAS, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1602, Permittee notified CDFW on November 11, 2021 that Permittee intends to complete the project described herein.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Fish and Game Code section 1603, CDFW has determined that the project could substantially adversely affect existing fish or wildlife resources and has included measures in the Agreement necessary to protect those resources.

WHEREAS, Permittee has reviewed the Agreement and accepts its terms and conditions, including the measures to protect fish and wildlife resources.

NOW THEREFORE, Permittee agrees to complete the project in accordance with the Agreement.

PROJECT LOCATION
The Villa Serena Specific Plan Project (Project) is located within an unnamed stream, within the 15th Street Stormwater facility, tributary to West Cucamonga Channel, and thence the Santa Ana River (refer to Exhibit 1: Project Location), situated north of E. 15th Street and east of N. Himalayas Drive in the City of Upland (City), County of San Bernardino, State of California; Latitude 34.118289, Longitude -117.634312; Assessor’s Parcel Number: 1045-121-04. The Project is bounded to the east, west, and south by single-family residential dwellings, a southern California Edison substation is located northwest, and Upland Hills Country Club and residential community is located to the north.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
.

Page 3629 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 2 of 18 ends

The proposed Project would consist of the development of the Project site with 65 single-family detached residential units, on-site active and passive recreational amenities, the extension of improvements along 15 th Street, and construction of off-site public open space improvements. The City has determined the 9.2 acre portion of the flood control detention basin comprising the Project site to be a surplus parcel. The remaining 11.1 acres of the Flood control detention basin would be adequate for continued flood control operations pursuant to completion of modifications to portions of the basin made as part of the proposed Project.

The stream is part of the 15th Street Stormwater facility and is approximately 20.3 acres and has a total watershed tributary of 583 acres based on an analysis by Madole & Associates Inc. (2021). The analysis also shows that the stream accepts storm flows from five drainage areas, referred to as Nodes 81, 72.3, 251, 361, and 431. In additional to the analysis by Madole & Associates Inc., Aspen Environmental Group prepared an Aquatic Resources Delineation Report in 2023 which identified a total of 4 drainages, referenced below. The stream in the western portion of the 15th Street Flood Basin (9.16 acres) will be filled to accommodate the residential development, and the existing basin infrastructure will be relocated to the eastern portion (11.1 acres) of the basin owned, operated, and controlled by the City to maintain flood control and retention operations.

Basin infrastructure modifications include:
• Node 81 (Drainage 1), located at the northwest corner of the proposed site, an existing 90-inch storm drain will be re-routed around the proposed residential project by construction of a new reinforced concrete box storm drain that will outlet into the southwest corner of the reduced basin. Node 81 maintains an area approximately 0.08 acres of stream resources/

• Node 251(Drainage 3) will continue into the reduced basin through a new 60-inch diameter concrete pipe, placed within the Upland Hills Golf Course and routed easterly to outlet into the northwest corner of the reduced basin. Node 241 maintains an area of approximately 1.32 acres of streambed.

• Node 72.3 (Drainage 2) will discharge directly into the storm drain facility that drains the basin. Node 72.3 maintains an area of approximately 0.02 acres of stream resources.

• No changes will occur at nodes 361 and 431 (Drainage 4), which are both located on the eastern portion of the reduced basin. Nodes 361 and 431 together maintain an area of approximately 1.48 acres of stream resources.

• Extension of approximately1,960 LF of the basin outlet from the western edge of the site to the eastern edge of the site. This extension will consist of an 84-inch RCP that will improve spillway flow and include a new outlet structure in the basin. The proposed pipe will extend from the southeast corner of the reduced basin west to the main Project entry, then south into 15th Street and west along

Page 3630 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 3 of 18 ends

15h Street connecting to the existing outlet pipe. Easements will be granted to the City for all basin infrastructure proposed to be located within the site.

• A trapezoidal emergency spillway, with a base width of 40 feet and a top of 52 feet will be installed at the northerly end of Grove Street within the reduced basin.

Construction equipment to be utilized during Project activities include crawler tractors, rubber-tired dozers, excavators, graders, cranes, forklifts, generator sets, welders, paving equipment, rollers, pavers.

PROJECT IMPACTS
Existing fish or wildlife resources the Project could substantially adversely affect include:

BIRDS: red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), Song sparrow (Melospiza melodia), red-winged blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus), Black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), Common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas), Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus), Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos), Cinnamon teal (Spatula cyanoptera), lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria), Allen’s hummingbird (Selasphorus sasin), black-crowned night heron (Nycticorax nycticorax), Nuttall’s woodpecker (Dryobates nuttallii), Pacific-slope flycatcher (Empidonax difficilis), ash-throated flycatcher (Myiarchus cinerascens), pine siskin (Spinus pinus), white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), chipping sparrow (Spizella ppasserine, hooded oriole (Icterus cucullatus), Nashville warbler (Leiothylpis ruficapilla), orange-crowned warbler (Leiothlypis celata), black-headed grosbeak (Pheucticus melanocephalus), great blue heron (Ardea herodias); Mammals: Coyote (Canis latrans), California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheeyi), desert cottontail (Sylvilagus auduboni); Reptiles: Western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana); Vegetation: cattail marsh (Typha latifolia), California buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), showy penstemon (Penstemon spectabilis), Pomona milkvetch (Astragalus pomonensis), hairy yerba santa (Eriodictyon trichocalyx, mulefat (Baccharis salicifolia), common monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus), black sage (Salvia mellifera), hollyleaf cherry (Prunus ilicifolia), scale broom (Lepidospartum squamatum), California sycamore (Platanus racemosa), coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia).

The adverse effects the Project could have on the fish or wildlife resources identified above include: loss of bed or bank, change in contour of channel, soil compaction, short- and long- term release of contaminants from concrete, loss of foraging habitat, loss of riparian habitat, disruption to nesting birds and other wildlife, disruption to wildlife movement, and temporary impacts to water quality.

The Agreement authorizes permanent impacts to 9.16 of Fish and Game Code section 1602 stream resources (Refer to Exhibit 2: CDFW Jurisdictional Areas). If any additional impacts to Fish and Game Code section 1602 resources are anticipated, Permittee shall consult with CDFW and submit a new notification or, if approved by CDFW, apply for an amendment to this Agreement for authorization of those impacts.

MEASURES TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES

Page 3631 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 4 of 18 ends

1. Administrative Measures
Permittee shall meet each administrative requirement described below.

1.1 Documentation at Project Site. Permittee shall make the Agreement, any extensions and amendments to the Agreement, and all related notification materials and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, readily available at the Project site at all times and shall be presented to CDFW personnel, or personnel from another state, federal, or local agency upon request.

1.2 Providing Agreement to Persons at Project Site. Permittee shall provide copies of the Agreement and any extensions and amendments to the Agreement to all persons who will be working on the Project at the Project site on behalf of Permittee, including but not limited to contractors, subcontractors, inspectors, and monitors.

1.3 Notification of Conflicting Provisions. Permittee shall notify CDFW if Permittee determines or learns that a provision in the Agreement might conflict with a provision imposed on the Project by another local, state, or federal agency. In that event, CDFW shall contact Permittee to resolve any conflict.

1.4 Project Site Entry. Permittee agrees that CDFW personnel may enter the Project site at any time to verify compliance with the Agreement.

1.5 Additional Project Impacts. Permittee shall submit to CDFW a request to amend this Agreement if any additional projects or impacts subject to Fish and Game Code section 1602 not identified in this Agreement are anticipated. No additional impacts subject to Fish and Game Code section 1602 are authorized unless the projects and/or impacts are expressly authorized by CDFW by amendment to this Agreement.

1.6 Take of Listed Species. The issuance of this Agreement does not authorize the take, incidental or otherwise, of any state or federally listed threatened, endangered, candidate or fully protected species. Take of any California Endangered Species Act (CESA) listed species is prohibited except as authorized by state law (Fish and G. Code, §§ 2080 & 2085). Consequently, if the Project, including Project construction or any Project-related activity during the life of the Project, may result in take of CESA-listed species, CDFW recommends that the Project proponent seek appropriate authorization prior to Project implementation.

This may include an incidental take permit (ITP) or a consistency determination (Fish & G. Code, §§ 2080.1 & 2081).

1.7 Take of Nesting Birds. Fish and Game Code section 3503 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds -of-prey) to

Page 3632 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 5 of 18 ends

take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The issuance of this Agreement does not in any way exempt or excuse compliance with these statutes.

2. Avoidance and Minimization Measures
To avoid or minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources identified above, Permittee shall implement each measure listed below.

2.1 Designated Biologist. Permittee shall submit to CDFW for review the name, contact information, and qualifications of each biologist, botanist, or other specialist (Designated Biologist(s)) proposed to perform surveys, prepare of implement mitigation plans, and/or conduct monitoring activities addressed by this Agreement.

Permittee shall specify within these submittals which activities each Designated Biologist is being considered for, and clearly identify the qualifications and experience they possess to support the assignment. Permittee shall submit the aforementioned information at least 30 days before commencement of Project activities addressed by this Agreement. Permittee shall notify CDFW in advance and in writing if a Designated Biologist must be changed to a person not previously proposed for the Project.

2.2 Qualifications of Designated Biologist(s). Permittee shall ensure that each Designated Biologist is knowledgeable and experienced in the identification, life history, behavior, and habitat requirements of species with potential to be impacted by the Project and shall ensure that the Designated Biologist responsible for overseeing the mitigation, is knowledgeable and experienced in habitat creation, restoration, and enhancement projects in southern California. Permittee shall also ensure that handling of non-listed fish, wildlife, or plant species is conducted only by Designated Biologists approved by CDFW in writing. Handling of state-listed species will require CESA authorization.

2.3 Responsibility of Designated Biologist(s). The Designated Biologist(s) shall be responsible for monitoring activities addressed by this Agreement, including, but not limited to all activities that result in clearing, grading, excavation, and/or other ground-disturbing activities. To ensure compliance with the measures of this Agreement, the Designated Biologist(s) shall confirm and monitor the limits of Project activities addressed by this Agreement.

2.4 Authority of Designated Biologist. To ensure compliance with the measures of this Agreement, the Designated Biologist(s) shall immediately halt any activity that does not comply with this Agreement, and/or order any reasonable measure to avoid the violation of, or maintain compliance with, any measure of this Agreement.

The Designated Biologist(s) shall not have the authority to handle any listed species (e.g., threatened, endangered, candidate) and must halt construction and notify CDFW immediately if any listed species identified within o r adjacent to the Project area and could be impacted by the Project. If compliance with any measure

Page 3633 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 6 of 18 ends

of this Agreement fails or if the measures of this permit are violated, Permittee shall notify CDFW immediately in writing at [email protected] with a cc to [email protected], and contact Lisa Cardoso at (805) 712-0346.

2.5 Pre-Construction Surveys. The Designated Biologist(s) shall conduct pre-Project surveys (in addition to the nesting bird, burrowing owl, and bat surveys as specified in Measures 2.7-2.9) within the Project area, including access route(s) and staging area(s) and an appropriate buffer surrounding those areas, no more than 3 days prior to initiating Project activities. The surveys shall be conducted to identify and map nesting birds, burrowing owls, special-status species, or listed species with the potential to occur on site including those identified in the Project Impacts section of this Agreement, and any dens, burrows, nests, etc. capable of harboring a special-status or listed species. The Designated Biologist(s) shall ensure that the methods used to locate, identify, map, avoid and buffer individuals, or dens, burrows, or nests of individuals, are appropriate and effective, including the assurance that the surveyor has attained 100% visual coverage of the entirety of the Project impact areas and access routes, and an appropriate buffer surrounding those arears. If any listed species (or sign of presence) is discovered, Permittee shall halt all Project activities that could affect the listed species and notify CDFW within 24 hours of the discovery. If the Project activities have the potential to impact a listed species, an ITP may be required before the Project activities can begin (Refer to Measure 1.6 above).

2.6 Pre-activity Sweeps. The Designated Biologist(s) shall conduct pre-activity sweeps within the Project areas (including access routes) and a 500-foot buffer surrounding the Project areas, within 2 hours of initiating Project activities. The pre- activity sweeps shall confirm and mark/map for avoidance the location of any known nesting bird(s) and/or special-status species and shall verify that no addition/new nesting bird(s) and/or special-status species have occupied the Project areas or adjacent habitats. If any additional/new nesting bird(s) and/or special-status species (or sign of presence) are identified within or adjacent to the Project areas during the pre-activity sweep, Permittee shall determine whether the proposed avoidance measures will be effective in fully avoiding impacts of the Project on the identified resource(s) prior to initiating Project activities. If full avoidance of listed species cannot be accomplished, Permittee shall postpone the Project, and seek CESA authorization for those impacts.

2.7 Nesting Birds. Permittee shall ensure that impacts to nesting birds are avoided through the implementation of preconstruction surveys, ongoing monitoring, and if necessary, establishment of minimization measures. Permittee shall designate a biologist (Designated Biologist) experienced in: identifying local and migratory bird species; conducting bird surveys using appropriate survey methodology (e.g., Ralph et al. 19931 and United States Fish and Wildlife Service and/or CDFW-

1 Ralph, C.J., G.R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T.E. Martin, and D.F. DeSanta. 1993. Handbook of field methods for monitoring landbirds. General Technical Report PSW-GTR 144. USDA Forest Service Pacific

Page 3634 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 7 of 18 ends

accepted species-specific survey protocols, available here:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/conservation/survey-protocols); nesting surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding territories, and identifying nesting stages and nest success (e.g., Martin and Geupel 19932); determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures.

2.7.1 Surveys shall be conducted by the Designated Biologist at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions, no more than 3 days prior to the initiation of Project activities addressed by this Agreement. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the property; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate. Pre-construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior (e.g., copulation, carrying of food or nest materials, nest building, removal of fecal sacks, flushing suddenly from atypically close range, agitation, aggressive interactions, feigning injury or distraction displays, or other behaviors). If a nest is suspected, but not confirmed, the Designated Biologist shall establish a disturbance-free buffer until additional surveys can be completed, or until the location can be inferred based on observations. The Designated Biologist shall not risk failure of the nest to determine the exact location or status and will make every effort to limit the nest to potential predation as a result of the survey/monitoring efforts (e.g., limit number of surveyors, limit time spent at/near the nest, scan the site for potential nest predators before approaching, immediately depart nest area if indicators of stress or agitation are displayed). If a nest is observed, but thought to be inactive, the Designated Biologist shall monitor the nest for 1 hour (4 hours for raptors during the non-breeding season) prior to approaching the nest to determine status. The Designated Biologist shall use their best profess ional judgement regarding the monitoring period and whether approaching the nest is appropriate. Results of pre-construction surveys shall be provided to CDFW per Measure 3.1.

2.7.2 When an active nest is confirmed, the Designated Biologist(s) shall immediately establish a conservative buffer surrounding the nest based on their best professional judgement and experience. The buffer shall be delineated to ensure that its location is known by all persons working within

Southwest Research Station. Albany, CA.

2 Martin, T.E. and G.R. Geupel. 1993. Nest-monitoring plots: methods for locating nests and monitoring success. Journal of Field Ornithology 64:507-514.

Page 3635 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 8 of 18 ends

the vicinity but shall not be marked in such a manner that it attracts predators. Once the buffer is established, the Designated Biologist(s) shall document baseline behavior, stage of reproduction, and existing site conditions, including vertical and horizontal distances from proposed work areas, visual or acoustic barriers, and existing level of disturbance.

Following documentation of baseline conditions, the Designated Biologist(s) may choose to adjust the buffer based on site characteristics, stage of reproduction, and types of Project activities proposed at/near that location.

The Designated Biologist(s) shall monitor the nest at the onset of Project activities addressed by this Agreement, and at the onset of any changes in Project activities (e.g., increase in number or type of equipment, change in equipment usage, etc.) to determine the efficacy of the buffer. If the Designated Biologist(s) determines that Project activities may be causing an adverse reaction, the Designated Biologist(s) shall adjust t he buffer accordingly.

2.7.3 The Designated Biologist(s) shall be onsite daily to monitor all existing nests, the efficacy of established buffers, and to document any new nesting occurrences. The Designated Biologist(s) shall document the status of all existing nests, including the stage of reproduction and the expected fledge date. If a nest is suspected to have been abandoned or failed, CDFW recommends the Designated Biologist(s) monitor the nest for a minimum of 1 hour (4 hours for raptors), uninterrupted, during favorable field conditions.

If no activity is observed during that time, the Designated Biologist(s) may approach the nest to assess the status.

2.7.4 Permittee, under the direction of the Designated Biologist (s), may also take steps to discourage nesting on the Project site, including moving equipment and materials daily, covering material with tarps or fabric, and securing all open pipes and construction materials. The Designated Biologist (s) shall ensure that none of the materials used pose an entanglement risk to birds or other species.

2.7.5 The Designated Biologist(s) shall be responsible for providing summary reports, as specified in Measure 3.2 to CDFW no less than once weekly regarding the nesting species identified onsite, discovery of any of new nests, the status/outcome of any previously identified nest, buffer distances established for each nest, and any adjustments made to established buffe rs.

If the Project results in the abandonment of, or damage to a nest, Permittee shall notify CDFW within 24 hours.

2.8 Burrowing Owl. Permittee shall ensure that impacts to burrowing owls are avoided through the implementation of preconstruction surveys, ongoing monitoring, and if necessary, establishment of minimization and mitigation measures.

2.8.1 Surveys shall be conducted by Designated Biologist(s) at the appropriate

Page 3636 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 9 of 18 ends

time of day/dawn, during appropriate weather conditions, no more than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the initiation of Project activities addressed by this Agreement. The survey shall include inspection of all burrows that exhibit typical characteristics of owl activity such as owls themselves, burrows, and owl sign at burrow entrances, including pellets, feces or other “ornamentation”, feathers, prey remains, whitewash, etc.

Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the property; density and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collec ted is complete and accurate.

2.8.2 Buffers. When an active or occupied burrow is confirmed, Designated Biologist(s) shall immediately establish a conservative buffer surrounding the burrow based on their best professional judgement and experience. The buffer shall be delineated to ensure that its location is known by all persons working within the vicinity but shall not be marked in such a manner that it attracts predators. Once the buffer is established, the Designated Biologist shall document baseline behavior, stage of reproduction, and e xisting site conditions, including vertical and horizontal distances from proposed work areas, visual or acoustic barriers, and existing level of disturbance. Following documentation of baseline conditions, Designated Biologist(s) may choose to make adjustments to the buffer based on site characteristics, stage of reproduction, and types of Project activities proposed at/near that location.

Designated Biologist(s) shall monitor the burrow at the onset of Project activities addressed by this Agreement, and at the onset of any changes in Project activities (e.g., increase in number or type of equipment, change in equipment usage, etc.) to determine the efficacy of the buffer. If Designated Biologist(s) determines that Project activities may be causing an adverse reaction, Designated Biologist(s) shall adjust the buffer accordingly.

2.8.3 Burrowing Owl Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. If burrowing owls are detected on or adjacent to the Project site and cannot be completely avoided, a Burrowing Owl Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to disturbance of the owl(s). The Burrowing Owl Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites that will be disturbed by the Project; proposed relocation, monitoring, and minimization actions; and details on adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls for relocation. If no suitable habitat is available nearby for relocation, details regarding the creation of artificial burrows (numbers, location, and type of burrows) shall be identified in the Burrowing Owl Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. The Burrowing Owl Mitigation and Monitoring Plan shall also include an impact analysis consistent with the 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and shall identify mitigation including acquisition, permanent protect ion, and funding of mitigation lands for the loss of burrowing owl habitat. The Permittee shall implement the Burrowing Owl Mitigation and Monitoring Plan

Page 3637 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 10 of 18 ends

following CDFW review and approval.

2.9 Crotch’s Bumble Bee. The Designated Biologist(s) shall conduct focused surveys within one year prior to vegetation removal and/or grading for the presence/absence of Crotch’s bumble bee. Surveys shall be conducted during flying season when the species is most likely to be detected above ground, between March 1 to September 1, by an approved Designated Biologist, familiar with Crotch’s bumble bee behavior and life history. Surveys shall be conducted within the Project site and areas adjacent to the Project site where suitable habitat exists. Survey results including negative findings shall be submitted to CDFW 30 days prior to Project-related vegetation removal and/or ground-disturbing activities.

If the species is identified onsite, Permittee shall apply for an ITP and onbain “take” coverage prior to the initiation of Project activities.

2.10 Moving Out of Harm ’s W a y . To reduce direct injury and mortality, the Designated biologist(s) shall be at the Project site prior to and during all ground- and habitat- disturbing activities to move or allow to move out of harm’s way any special status species not addressed by specific Measures or other wildlife that would otherwise be injured or killed from Project-related activities. Movement of wildlife out of harm’s way should be limited to only those individuals that would otherwise by injured or killed, and individuals should be moved only as far a necessary to ensure their safety.

2.11 Best Management Practices (BMPs). Permittee shall actively implement (BMPs) to prevent erosion and the discharge of sediment and pollutants into streams during Project activities. Permittee shall monitor and repair BMPs if necessary, to ensure maximum erosion, sediment, and pollution control. Permittee shall prohibit the use of erosion control materials potentially harmful to fish and wildlife species, such as mono-filament netting (erosion control matting) or similar material, within and adjacent to any river, lake, or stream. All fiber rolls, straw wattles, and/or hay bales utilized within and adjacent to the Project site shall be free of nonnative plant materials. Fiber rolls or erosion control mesh shall be made of loose-weave mesh that is not fused at the intersections of the weave, such as jute, or coconut (coir) fiber, or other products without welded weaves. Non-welded weaves reduce entanglement risks to wildlife by allowing animals to push through the weave, which expands when spread.

2.12 Equipment Use and Cleaning. All equipment shall be cleaned prior to entering the bed and bank of the stream. Washing must take place where rinse water is collected and disposed of in either a sanitary sewer, landfill, or other facility authorized to accept such rinse water. The cleaning measures must be practical and verifiable. Depending on the nature of the d ebris, the equipment may be cleaned using mechanical methods (brushing, scraping, prying), compressed air, high-pressure water, or steam. This includes wheels, tires, buckets, stabilizers, undercarriages, and bumpers. The Permittee shall verify and document cleaning has occurred prior to equipment entering the bed and bank of the stream;

Page 3638 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 11 of 18 ends

documentation of equipment inspections for each date of entry shall be available to CDFW upon request.

2.13 Nonnative Plant Species. CDFW recommends the use of native plants to the greatest extent feasible in the landscaped areas adjacent to and/or near mitigation/open space areas and within or adjacent to stream channels. Permittee shall not plant, seed, or otherwise introduce nonnative plant species to the landscaped areas adjacent to and/or near mitigation/open space areas and within or adjacent to stream channels. If Permittee will plant/seed using non-native plant materials, there must be a minimum 100-foot setback from open space areas and a minimum 150-foot setback from stream channels and wetlands/riparian mitigation sites.

2.14 Pollution and Litter. Permittee shall comply with all litter and pollution laws. All contractors, subcontractors, and employees shall also obey these laws and it shall be the responsibility of Permittee to ensure compliance.

2.14.1 Permittee shall not allow water containing mud, silt, or other pollutants from grading, aggregate washing, or other activities to enter a lake, streambed, or flowing stream or be placed in locations that may be subjected to high storm flows.

2.14.2 Spoil sites shall not be located within a lake, streambed, or flowing stream or locations that may be subjected to high storm flows, where spoil shall be washed back into a lake, streambed, or flowing stream where it will impact streambed habitat and aquatic or riparian vegetation.

2.14.3 Raw cement/concrete or washings thereof, asphalt, paint, or other coating material, oil or other petroleum products, or any other substances which could be hazardous to fish and wildlife resources resulting from Project related activities shall be prevented from contaminating the soil and/or entering a lake, streambed, or flowing stream. These materials, placed within or where they may enter a lake, streambed, or flowing stream by Permittee or any party working under contract or with the permission of Permittee, shall be removed immediately.

2.14.4 No broken concrete, cement, debris, soil, silt, sand, bark, slash, sawdust, rubbish, or washings thereof, oil or petroleum products, or other organic or earthen material from any construction or associated activity of whatever nature shall be allowed to enter into or be placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into any river, stream, or lake. When operations are completed, any excess materials or debris shall be removed from the work area. No rubbish shall be deposited within 150 feet of the high-water mark of any lake, streambed, or flowing stream. No equipment maintenance shall be done within or near any lake, streambed, or flowing stream where petroleum products or other pollutants from the equipment may enter these areas under any flow.

Page 3639 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 12 of 18 ends

2.14.5 No equipment maintenance shall be done within or near any lake, streambed, or flowing stream where petroleum products or other pollutants are from the equipment may enter these areas under any flow.

2.15 Trash Abatement and Refuse Removal. Permittee shall ensure that trash and food items are contained in animal-proof containers and removed at the end of each workday to avoid attracting opportunistic predators such as ravens, coyotes, and feral dogs. Upon completion of Project activities, Permittee shall remove and properly dispose of all refuse, including, but not limited to, broken equipment parts, wrapping material, cords, cables, wire, rope, strapping.

2.16 Stockpile Maintenance. Permittee shall maintain stockpiles to avoid the spread of invasive plants. Permittee shall not stockpile materials within the bed, bank or channel after daily work has been completed.

2.17 Staging Areas. Permittee shall confine all Project site-related parking, storage areas, laydown sites, equipment storage, and any other Project site staging activities to locations outside of the bed and bank of the stream.

2.18 Remove Temporary Flagging and Barriers. Permittee shall remove all temporary flagging and/or barriers from the Project site and vicinity of Fish and Game Code section 1602 resource areas upon completion of Project activities.

3. Compensatory Measures
To compensate for adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources identified above that cannot be avoided or minimized, Permittee shall implement each measure listed below.

3.1 Option 1 - Habitat Mitigation. Within 3 months of completion of the Project, Permittee shall implement the Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) provided in the Notification package, following review and approval by CDFW.

Habitat mitigation shall consist of the creation of 1.2 acres of mule fat scrub and enhancement of 0.3 acres of wetland within the 1.5 acres at the eastern portion of the reduced basin bottom (Mitigation Area). The Mitigation Area will be maintained and managed to improve habitat quality and shall meet success criteria established in the CDFW-approved HMMP. Permittee shall provide details of each maintenance visit and the results and each monitoring visit for the Mitigation Area to CDFW annually, as described in Measure 4.3.

3.2 Option 2 – Purchase Credits from Mitigation Bank. Permittee shall purchase 1.5 streambed enhancement credits from CDFW approved mitigation bank(s).

Permittee shall obtain CDFW approval regarding the choice of the mitigation bank prior to credit purchase. Proof of purchase shall be provided to CDFW no later than 30 days prior to initiation of project activities authorized in this agreement.

Page 3640 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 13 of 18 ends

4. Reporting Measures
Permittee shall meet each reporting requirement described below.

4.1 Pre-construction Nesting Bird Survey Report. Prior to commencement of Project activities, Permittee shall submit the results of pre-construction nesting bird surveys completed pursuant to Measure 2.7.1 of this Agreement to [email protected].

4.2 Nesting Bird Summary Reports. Permittee shall prepare and submit to CDFW a summary, as described in Measure 2.7.5 of this Agreement, of nesting species identified onsite, discovery of any of new nests, the status/outcome of any previously identified nest, buffer distances established for each nest, and any adjustments made to established buffers. Summary reports shall be submitted on a weekly basis until there is no further evidence of nesting activity. If the Project results in the abandonment of or damage to a nest, Permittee shall notify CDFW within 24 hours.

4.3 Annual Reporting – Mitigation Area (Option 1). Permittee shall submit annual reports to CDFW for a minimum of 5 years following the initiation of restoration/ enhancement activities, or until CDFW deems the Habitat Mitigation successful (see Measure 3.1 above). At a minimum, the reports shall include the following information: (1) a description of the habitat maintenance and monitoring activities conducted during the previous year: (a) details of nonnative plant removal efforts, such as, the methods used for removal, the amount removed and/or treated, t he frequency and timing of removal and treatment, disposal specifics, and a summary of the general successes and failures or failure of the nonnative removal plan; and (b) an overview of any supplemental planting /seeding conducted, including the number of plants/amount of seed installed, and the location and timing of replacement planting/seeding; (2) current site conditions, including: the percent survival, percent cover, and composition of the habitat, and the methods used to assess these parameters; (3) a list of wildlife species observed within the restoration site during monitoring surveys, including sensitive species and/or listed species; and (4) photos from designated photo stations. The first annual report is due to CDFW no later than 13 months fo llowing the initiation of restoration/enhancement activities.

4.4 Notification to CNDDB. If any sensitive species (threatened, endangered, candidate, fully protected, species of special concern, etc.) are observed on or in proximity to the Project site, or during Project surveys, Permittee shall submit California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) forms and maps to the CNDDB within five working days of the sightings. The CNDDB form is available online at:
https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submittign-Data . A copy of this information shall also be mailed or emailed within seven days to CDFW at the address or email listed below under Contact Information. Please reference Notification No. EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6.

Page 3641 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 14 of 18 ends

4.5 Notification of Start of Construction. Permittee shall notify CDFW, in writing, at least 14 days prior to Project initiation. Notification shall be sent via email to [email protected] with a cc to [email protected].

Please reference Notification No. EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6.

CONTACT INFORMATION
Any communication that Permittee or CDFW submits to the other shall be submitted through EPIMS as instructed by CDFW.

To Permittee:

Brian Bush
EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Villa Serena Specific Plan
[email protected]
To CDFW:

Department of Fish and Wildlife
Inland Deserts Region
EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Villa Serena Specific Plan
[email protected]

LIABILITY
Permittee shall be solely liable for any violations of the Agreement, whether committed by Permittee or any person acting on behalf of Permittee, including its officers, employees, representatives, agents or contractors and subcontractors, to complete the Project or any activity related to it that the Agreement authorizes.

This Agreement does not constitute CDFW’s endorsement of, or require Permittee to proceed with the Project. The decision to proceed with the Project is Permittee’s alone.

SUSPENSION AND REVOCATION
CDFW may suspend or revoke in its entirety the Agreement if it determines that Permittee or any person acting on behalf of Permittee, including its officers, employees, representatives, agents, or contractors and subcontractors, is not in compliance with the Agreement.

Before CDFW suspends or revokes the Agreement, it shall provide Permittee written notice by certified or registered mail that it intends to suspend or revoke. The notice shall state the reason(s) for the proposed suspension or revocation, provide Permittee an opportunity to correct any deficiency before CDFW suspends or revokes the Agreement, and include instructions to Permittee, if necessary, including but not limited

Page 3642 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 15 of 18 ends

to a directive to immediately cease the specific activity or activities that caused CDFW to issue the notice.

ENFORCEMENT
Nothing in the Agreement precludes CDFW from pursuing an enforcement action against Permittee instead of, or in addition to, suspending or revoking the Agreement.

Nothing in the Agreement limits or otherwise affects CDFW's enforcement authority or that of its enforcement personnel.

OTHER LEGAL OBLIGATIONS
This Agreement does not relieve Permittee or any person acting on behalf of Permittee, including its officers, employees, representatives, agents, or contractors and subcontractors, from complying with, or obtaining any other permits or authorizations that might be required under, other federal, state, or local laws or regulations before beginning the Project or an activity related to it. For example, if the Project causes take of a species listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), such take will be unlawful under the ESA absent a permit or other form of authorization from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisherie s Service.

This Agreement does not relieve Permittee or any person acting on behalf of Permittee, including its officers, employees, representatives, agents, or contractors and subcontractors, from complying with other applicable statutes in the Fish and Game Code including, but not limited to, Fish and Game Code sections 2050 et seq. (threatened and endangered species), section 3503 (bird nests and eggs), section 3503.5 (birds of prey), section 5650 (water pollution), section 5652 (refuse disposal into water), section 5901 (fish passage), section 5937 (sufficient water for fish), and section 5948 (obstruction of stream).

Nothing in the Agreement authorizes Permittee or any person acting on behalf of Permittee, including its officers, employees, representatives, agents, or contractors and subcontractors, to trespass.

AMENDMENT
CDFW may amend the Agreement at any time during its term if CDFW determines the amendment is necessary to protect an existing fish or wildlife resource.

Permittee may amend the Agreement at any time during its term, provided the amendment is mutually agreed to in writing by CDFW and Permittee. To request an amendment, Permittee shall log into EPIMS and submit to CDFW a completed CDFW “Amendment & Extension” form. Permittee shall include with the completed form, payment of the corresponding amendment fee identified in CDFW’s current fee schedule (see Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 699.5).

Page 3643 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 16 of 18 ends

TRANSFER AND ASSIGNMENT
This Agreement may not be transferred or assigned to another entity, and any purported transfer or assignment of the Agreement to another entity shall not be valid or effective, unless the transfer or assignment is requested by Permittee in writing, as specified below, and thereafter CDFW approves the transfer or assignment in writing. Such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed.

The transfer or assignment of the Agreement to another entity shall constitute a minor amendment, and therefore to request a transfer or assignment, Permittee shall log into EPIMS and submit to CDFW a completed CDFW “Amendment & Extension” form.

Permittee shall include with the completed form, payment of the minor amendment fee identified in CDFW’s current fee schedule (see Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 699.5).

EXTENSIONS
In accordance with Fish and Game Code section 1605, subdivision (b), Permittee may request one extension of the Agreement, provided the request is made prior to the expiration of the Agreement’s term. To request an extension, Permittee shall log into EPIMS and submit to CDFW a completed CDFW “Amendment & Extension’ form.

Permittee shall include with the completed form, payment of the extension fee identified in CDFW’s current fee schedule (see Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 699.5). CDFW shall process the extension request in accordance with Fish and Game Code section 1605, subdivisions (b) through (e).

If Permittee fails to submit a request to extend the Agreement prior to its expiration, Permittee must submit a new notification and notification fee before beginning or continuing the Project the Agreement covers (Fish & G. Code § 1605, subd. (f)).

EFFECTIVE DATE
The Agreement becomes effective on the date of CDFW’s signature, which shall be: 1) after Permittee’s signature; 2) after CDFW complies with all applicable requirements under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and 3) after payment of the applicable Fish and Game Code section 711.4 filing fee listed at https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/CEQA/Fees .

TERM
This Agreement shall expire on January 2, 2027, unless it is terminated or extended before then. All provisions in the Agreement shall remain in force throughout its term.

Permittee shall remain responsible for implementing any provisions specified herein to protect fish and wildlife resources after the Agreement expires or is terminated, as Fish and Game Code section 1605, subdivision (a)(2) requires.

EXHIBITS

Page 3644 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 17 of 18 ends

The documents listed below are included as exhibits to the Agreement and incorporated herein by reference.

A. Exhibit 1: Project Location

AUTHORITY
If the person signing the Agreement (signatory) is doing so as a representative of Permittee, the signatory hereby acknowledges that he or she is doing so on Permittee’s behalf and represents and warrants that he or she has the authority to legally bind Permittee to the provisions herein.

AUTHORIZATION
This Agreement authorizes only the Project described herein. If Permittee begins or completes a Project different from the Project the Agreement authorizes, Permittee may be subject to civil or criminal prosecution for failing to notify CDFW in accordance with Fish and Game Code section 1602.

CONCURRENCE
Through the electronic signature by the permittee or permittee’s representative as evidenced by the attached concurrence from CDFW’s Environmental Permit Information Management System (EPIMS), the permittee accepts and agrees to comply with all provisions contained herein.

The EPIMS concurrence page containing electronic signatures must be attached to this agreement to be valid.

Page 3645 of 3744 ends

EPIMS-SBR-24938-R6
Streambed Alteration Agreement

Page 18 of 18 ends

Exhibit 1: Project Location

Page 3646 of 3744 ends

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits City Officers from participating in any action concerning a license, permit, other entitlement for use, franchise, or contract (collectively “license, permit, or contract”) if they receive political contribution(s) from a party, or its agent(s), totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months before the proceeding, while a proceeding is pending, and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Upland City Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding and recuse themselves before the proceeding unless the violation has been properly cured.

Current Upland City Council Members are listed at:
https://www.uplandca.gov/city-council-treasurer
Parties and their Agents are responsible for accessing the link to review the names and disclosing their applicable contributions to City Officers on the record of a proceeding.

As a party to a proceeding, you are also required to provide information below about contributions made by you, your agents on behalf of you or your organization, your organization subject to the proceeding with the City, and any organization you direct or control pursuant to the aggregation rules at FPPC Reg. § 18438.5, except for uncompensated officers of a nonprofit organization. This form is to be submitted to the City of Upland and is a public record. If you have any questions about this form, please contact your City representative for assistance.

1. Have you or your company, or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/entity, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application, or the anticipated date of any Council action?
___ YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
___ NO

2. Do you or your company/entity, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months following any Council action related to your proposal or application? ___ YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
___ NO
Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the Upland City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action. It does, however, preclude the identified Council Member(s) from participating in any actions related to your proposal or application.

_________________ _____________________________
Date Signature of authorized individual
_____________________________
Company/Applicant Name

(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)
5/29/2025
Urban Crossroads Inc

Page 3647 of 3744 ends

LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DEFINITIONS

Term Definition Law
Covered
"proceedings"
A proceeding to grant, deny, revoke, restrict, or modify a license, permit or other entitlement for use, that
does not solely involve purely ministerial decisions
and is:
(1) Applied for by the party;
(2) Formally or informally requested by the party; or
(3) A contract between the agency and the party or a
franchisee granted by the agency to the party, other
than a contract that is competitively bid, a labor
contract, or a personal employment contract.

FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)
Party
Any person who files an application for, or is the
subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use.

Gov. Code 84308(a)(1)
Participant
Any person who is not a party but who actively
supports or opposes a particular decision in a
proceeding involving a license, permit, or other
entitlement for use and who has a financial interest in the decision. A person actively supports or opposes a
particular decision in a proceeding if that person
lobbies in person the officers or employees of the
agency, testifies in person before the agency, or
otherwise acts to influence officers of the agency.

Gov. Code 84308(a)(2)
FPPC Reg 18438.4
Agent
A person who represents a party or participant for
compensation and appears before or otherwise
communicates with the governmental agency for the
purpose of influencing the pending proceeding. See
FPPC Reg 18438.3 for exceptions for certain
consultants.

FPPC Reg 18438.3
Competitively Bid
A contract required by law to be awarded to the lowest
responsible bidder with a responsive bid, or, if the
successful bidder refuses or fails to execute the
contract, to the next lowest bidder with a responsive
bid.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(A)
Labor Contract
A contract or agreement reached through collective
bargaining or with a representative group regarding
the salary, benefits, or terms and conditions under an
employment or retirement policy for employees or
retirees, including a project labor agreement entered
under Public Contract Code Section 2500.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(B)
Personal
Employment
Contract
A contract for employment, including the terms and
conditions of employment, between the agency and
an agency employee. A contract with an independent
contractor is NOT a personal employment contract.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(C)-(D)

Page 3648 of 3744 ends

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the'tevine Act,'prohibits City Officers from participating in any action concerning a license, permit, other entitlement for use, franchise, or contract (collectively "license, permit, or contract") if they receive political contribution(s) from a party, or its agent(s), totalinB more than 5500 within the twelve (12) months before the proceeding, while a proceeding is pending, and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Upland City Coun€il who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record ofthe proceedinE and recuse themselves before the proceeding unless the violation has been properly cured,
Current Upland City Council Members are lhted at:

Parties and theirAgents are responsible for accessingthe linkto review the names and disclosing their applicable contributions to City Officers on the record of a proceeding.

As a party to a proceeding, you are also required to provide information below about contributions made by you, your agents on behalf of you or your organization, your organization sLrbject to the proceeding with the City, and any organization you dir€ct or control pursuant to the aggregation rules at FPPC Reg. 5 18438.5, except for uncompensated offirers of a nonprofit organization. This form is to be submifted to the City of Llpland and is a public record. lf you have any questions about this form, please contact your City representative for assistance.
!ntrs://\,1rww. utlandca.eov/citv-cou ncil-lreasu rer
>s

1. Have you oryour companv, or any agent/board member on behalf ofyou oryour company/entity, made any political contributions of more than 5500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date ofthe submission ofyour proposalor application, orthe anticipated date of any Council YES lfyes, please identify the Council Membe(s)
)2110

2. Do you or your company/entrty, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticapate or plan to make any political contribution of more than S500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months followinE any coun€il action related to your proposal or applicahon? Answering yes to either of the two questrons above does not preclude the Upland City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action, lt does, however, preclude the identified Council Membe(s) from participating in any actrons related to your pro I or application horized i
Ssorr >4- 9otttnt 3-
Company/Applicant Name
(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)
lf yes, please id€ntify the Council Membe(s):_YEJ4"
Signatureoatl

Page 3649 of 3744 ends

Page 3650 of 3744 ends

Page 3651 of 3744 ends

Page 3652 of 3744 ends

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

_________________ _____________________________
Date Signature of authorized individual
_____________________________
Company/Applicant Name

(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)
Brian A. Bush
6/2/2025

Page 3653 of 3744 ends

LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DEFINITIONS

FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)
Party
Any person who files an application for, or is the
subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(C)-(D)

Page 3654 of 3744 ends

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

_________________ _____________________________
Date Signature of authorized individual
_____________________________
Company/Applicant Name

(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)
6/2/2025
Aspen Environmental Group

Page 3655 of 3744 ends

LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT DEFINITIONS

FPPC Reg 18438.2(a)
Party
Any person who files an application for, or is the
subject of, a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other entitlement for use.

FPPC Reg
18438.2(a)(3)(C)-(D)

Page 3656 of 3744 ends

DATE: June 9, 2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY, CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY: ROBERT D. DALQUEST, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

LORALEE FARRIS, PLANNING MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PUBLIC WATER LINE EASEMENT AT 1010 E. 20TH STREET

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt a Resolution approving the vacation of a 33-foot-wide portion of a water line easement over property located at 1010 E. 20th Street, further described as Assessor’s Parcel Number 1044- 102-08) and the underlying fee owner being Upland Storage Owner LLC.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action complies with the goals in the Colonies at San Antonio Specific Plan. The proposed vacation is an excess width of the public water line easement and is unnecessary for present or future use.

BACKGROUND
On June 23, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 21 -0006, for the construction and operation of the "Upland Storage Project". This project consists of the construction of a 164,570 square foot multi - story climate controlled public storage building on 3.06 acres, located on the south side of 20th Street at Campus Avenue. The public storage facility will provide 1,328 storage units and a 200 square-foot conference room in a 100% climate-controlled facility.

On July 28, 2021, the Planning Commission approved Development Plan Review No. 21 -0004, encompassing the design review of the facility. The project’s entitlements have since received approval of two, 1-year extensions to allow the applicant time to coordinate with Southern California Edison ("SCE") regarding the interface conditions at the shared western property line boundary.

Since approval of the project’s entitlements, the applicant has been issued a grading permit and has been grading the site. Condition of Approval No. 108 on the conditional use permit requires that any existing on-site utility lines that conflict with the project’s final design shall be relocated to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director. An existing water line traverses the site from north to south within an existing public utility easement on the western portion of the project site. Plans to relocate the water line within the western portion of the existing 73-foot wide easement were previously approved in 2024 and are in the process of being modified to align with the final construction plans.

Relocation of the water line is necessary to accommodate the constructi on of the building in its approved location.

With the relocation of the water line, there is no longer a public need for the full width of the 73 -foot-wide easement, and the utilities can be adequately served by the remaining 40-foot-wide western portion of the easement which leaves the eastern 33-feet excess easement area.

At their meeting of March 26, 2025, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 5025 making a determination of General Plan Conformity and rendering a determination that the vacati on of a 33-foot-wide portion of a 73-foot public water line easement would be in conformity with the City’s General Plan, in accordance with the provisions of State Government Code Section 65402(a).

On May 12, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6828 declaring its intention to vacate a 33-foot-wide portion of a 73-foot-wide public water line easement located within 1010 E. 20th Street, further described as Assessor’s Parcel Number 1044-102-08. In addition, the City Council set a public hearing for Monday, June 9, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. to consider the proposed vacation prior to adoption of the Resolution ordering the vacation and directed the City Clerk to publish and post a Notice of Hearing in accordance with the requirements of the California Stre ets and Highways Code Sections 8320, et seq.

Page 3657 of 3744 ends

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
The fee title of the proposed easement area to be vacated is currently vested to the property owner, Upland Storage Owner LLC. Vacation of a public service easements is governed by the Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easements Vacation Law (Streets & Highway Code, §§8300 -8374). Under the Streets & Highway Code, to vacate the excess easement area, the City Council must adopt a Resolution of Vacation pursuant to Government Code §65402(a). Also, the City must record the Resolution of Vacation with the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office per Streets & Highway Code, §8336. Concurrently with recording the vacation of the excess easement area, a new easement will be recorded to follow the alignment of the water line’s new location.

Per the requirements of the Streets and Highways Code, a Notice of Hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 26, 2025, and again on June 2, 2025. On May 22, 2025, staff posted notices of vacation along the public service easement in three locations, clearly visible from 20th Street. Also, on May 28, 2025, a Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all property owners within 300 feet of the project site. This resulted in a total of 13 pr operty owners being noticed. The Public Hearing Notice was also posted in 2 physical locations, Upland City Hall and Upland Library, and on the City website.

Staff also sent written notice to Southern California Edison, the Southern California Gas Company, Spectrum, Frontier, San Antonio Water Company and Holiday Rock (who has an existing private waterline running along 20 th Street) via Certified Mail on April 15, 2025. No objections or concerns were received regarding the proposed waterline easement vacation. The City’s Land Development and Transportation Division has also confirmed that, upon relocation of the water line to the remaining 40-foot wide easement area, the City does not have any need for future utility infrastructure within the excess 33-foot-wide portion of the easement area to be vacated.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed vacation of excess public utility easement width is Statutorily Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines and is an activity that is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. The applicant has paid the costs for preparation, process, and recordation of the vacation.

ALTERNATIVES
Provides alternative directions to staff.

CEQA: Determined to be Exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.

Page 3658 of 3744 ends

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE VACATION OF A
33-FOOT-WIDE PORTION OF A WATER LINE EASEMENT
OVER PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1010 E. 20TH STREET,
FURTHER DESCRIBED AS ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER
1044-102-08.

WHEREAS, Upland Storage Owner, LLC, the owner of the property located at 1010 E. 20th Street, has submitted an application request to vacate a 33-foot-wide portion of a 73-foot wide public water line easement located at 1010 E. 20th Street, further described as Assessor’s Parcel Number 1044-102-08; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized to vacate all or part of a public utility easement pursuant to California Streets and Highway Code Section 8300 et. seq; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Vacated Area, is legally described in Exhibit A and is shown on Exhibit B and is on file in the office of the Development Services Director; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on March 26, 2025, the City’s Planning Commission made a determination that the proposed street vacation will conform to the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on May 12, 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 6828, declaring its intention to vacate a 33-foot-wide portion of a 73-foot-wide public water line easement located at 1010 E. 20th Street, further described as Assessor’s Parcel Number 1044-102-08. In addition, the City Council set a public hearing for Monday, June 9, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. to consider the proposed vacation prior to adoption of the Resolution ordering the vacation and directed the City Clerk to publish and post a Notice of Hearing in accordance with the requirements of the California Streets and Highways Code Sections 8320, et seq; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Sections 8320, the City Clerk of the City of Upland subsequently caused the publishing of notices in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, for two successive weeks prior to the hearing, and City staff posted notices on the property along the width of the portion of public water line easement to be vacated at least two weeks prior to the date set for public hearing, no more than 300 feet apart, with at least three notices posted; and WHEREAS, the proposed water line easement vacation qualifies for an exemption from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines for projects where it can be seen with certainty there is no possibility of any significant environmental effects; and
WHEREAS, based on staff’s review of the vacation, no special circumstances exist that would create a reasonable possibility that granting the vacation will have a significant effect on the environment; and.

Page 3659 of 3744 ends

Resolution No.

Page 2 ends

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2025, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed vacation and considered all verbal and written testimony provided by persons interested in the proposed vacation.

NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Upland hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

Section 1. Incorporation of Recitals. The above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. DECLARATION. The City Council of the City of Upland, having elected to proceed under the provisions of Division 9, Part 3, Chapters 1 through 3, inclusive, of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and having held a public hearing as provided therein, hereby finds from all evidence submitted that the east 33 feet of a 73-foot-wide public utility easement totaling 9,918 square feet, which transects property located at 1010 E. 20th Street (APN: 1044-102-08), as and as more specifically described in Exhibits “A” and “B”, which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is unnecessary for present or prospective public use and that the public interest and convenience require the vacation of that portion of the public water line easement.

Section 3. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The proposed 33- foot-wide portion of a public easement vacation of a 73-foot-wide public water line easement located at 1010 E. 20th Street is exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines because it can be seen with certainty, based upon the testimony provided in the staff report, that approval of the street vacation will have no physical effect on the environment.

Section 4. FINDINGS. The City Council of the City of Upland hereby makes the following findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the vacation:

A. The vacation is consistent with the Upland General Plan as determined by the Planning Commission on March 26, 2025 through the adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 5025.

B. Per Upland Municipal Code Section 17.44.100(F), the review and decision- making authority may vacate an easement if the vacation complies with the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, other City ordinances, and any other applicable community or specific plans, and as supported by all of the following findings:

1. Finding: A petition has been completed containing the signatures of property owners who own more than two-thirds of the property abutting the portion of the street, alley, or easement to be vacated.

Evidence: The fee title of the proposed vacation area is currently vested to the property owner Upland Storage Owner LLC. The

Page 3660 of 3744 ends

Resolution No.

Page 3 ends

property owner has submitted a Street Vacation application containing the required signature.

2. Finding: The vacation is in the public interest.

Evidence: The excess Waterline Easement Area is an excess portion of a public service easement and is not needed for the City’s existing or future public utility requirements because the water line located within the Excess Waterline Easement Area will be concurrently relocated to the western 40 feet of the existing easement and a new easement will be recorded concurrently to follow its realignment. The vacation of the excess 9,918 square feet of easement area will allow for the development 164,570 square foot multi-story climate controlled public storage building approved under Conditional Use Permit No. 21-0006 and Development Plan Review No. 21-0004.

3. Finding: No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation.

Evidence: No property will be denied direct access as a result of the vacation. Existing access to the property, located at 1010 E. 20th Street (APN: 1044-102-08) will remain accessible from 20th Street.

Section 5. DETERMINATION. The City Council hereby vacates the Excess Waterline Easement Area in accordance with Section 8333(c) of the California Streets and Highways Code, as described in the attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit “B.”.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption.

Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Section 8. That the City Clerk of the City of Upland shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Vacation and Exhibits “A” and “B”, attached hereto and attested to by the City Clerk under seal, to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Upland this 9th day of June, 2025.

Bill Velto, Mayor

Page 3661 of 3744 ends

Resolution No.

Page 4 ends

I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 9th day of June, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

Page 3662 of 3744 ends

Resolution No.

Page 5 ends

Page 3663 of 3744 ends

Resolution No.

Page 6 ends

Page 3664 of 3744 ends

Resolution No.

Page 7 ends

Page 3665 of 3744 ends

Page 3666 of 3744 ends

Page 3667 of 3744 ends

Page 3668 of 3744 ends

Page 3669 of 3744 ends

Page 3670 of 3744 ends

Page 3671 of 3744 ends

Page 3672 of 3744 ends

Page 3673 of 3744 ends

Page 3674 of 3744 ends

Page 3675 of 3744 ends

Aerial Photograph of 1010 E 20th Street (APN 1044-102-08)

Page 3676 of 3744 ends

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

_________________ _____________________________
Date Signature of authorized individual
_____________________________
Company/Applicant Name

(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)
Michelle Bach
Digitally signed by Michelle Bach
DN: C=US,
[email protected],
O="1784 Holdings, LLC",
CN=Michelle Bach
Date: 2025.04.17 10:44:44-07'00'
x
x
04-17-2025
1784 Holdings LLC / Michelle Bach
VP Site Planning & Design

Page 3677 of 3744 ends

Upland City CouncilJune 9, 2025

Upland City Council
June 9, 2025