Upland City Council
June 9, 2025

TENTATIVE
IP
TRACT MAP 20245 r w 0 FOR SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES 16TH ST 0 CITY OF UPLAND , SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA I 15TH ST o 14TH ST PROJECT SITE
13TH ST
#�n•,.�1k, LU . ...., ,, , v� �a Q . Q ,, FOOTHILL Q BLVDI .� � --� 11 . 1 (14 4kgal -• ♦- . III��.`4111111. kr.i d !1.,i,„....s„..„,„ . ,...„.......„.......„.,-.-1^ •��'� tk n0 co w w Z + / I A P ill I 1111....."2-2,7-.1 -1-AVPIPIT �.---_I� idyll - , u0 LU CO
CC
V _ GRASS
IP LU
� ° illir � � _ ,��.� a - -- -- - -� liirlp-wm •� ��,�� LOT�y � .il �� �- � -� o°�� °I'� � �Rr.�l Mo 11631 fviA�� �� ' '� / fRlE�M1AlIINDE�F;ttil ,,::,_� �r�� ► i�/ `r�0 '-�"� ''.%'� _-- liM /7� VICINITY MAP �• �� �V-�.ai► ,';'''' ' � ) I I��i %1iFIENiTIPInililffikeN1110MIIM��� - ' i �� 10,...„ .._
■ � Illlilli� 1425 I I PLACE
___�- ___ ALL _ _
- - ........._ lit: �i.,-- .w!•.�R� -r'.ri.+..mow.-......-....`11R-._._. --.....--. ---....._ 111111. ..ram LJJJ �.w
IICOYOTE Rk1l_'1!`-'. .,� -LO � w rr�� a 6 I '����I �� _ _ - � 4� �.. r �� U coQ Q --_ -_ _= - -- ---- - ----- __ __ `� 8 I mo. s�" _1�r - I 14 J o 0 0 w T�Q(0�Ploo 1646J�IoDo 330�p7��® y- __ = = _ .. a L (��Pop g �Zg D.1 �p7� T °I ��o312 ° M3g� _ 07 i � - - _=ems , w� w� w� w� > �' °/ '4 - - - - ,. - _ ' _ _-- -���� 1 _ - - - r - AREA �5TH- STREET - -- - ' - r �Q Tu - _���;Q-\ 1 �, - ----- _ � - - TABLE J
a - - - �!/' Q I 1 - T � o""e-_ _ ,n��--•. - - - . - - - _ -.- - 15TH STREET , .�� _ = LOT 0 Q - -' I - - - - r_ = ;, - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 T N SQ. FT. PROPOSED USE OWNERSHIP v I II II 1 w 1 3,545 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE I'Ll
I o u4 w w w p Z 2 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE I I a > > Th COS Plop 6026 Mo 0 0 74I/ w TH�I(�T Mo,J6770o I :II IuVWC�T Po..J6a0 ,fo3��136p67�61 M IMr Ho. � �I(�T Po.. I � w I T°d(�T Ha. �1h(��Ho. I w z > 3 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE I �I IK 133/57-61 1 r 5 0673 Mo n o 0199 KB. Q > 9109 KB. 5926 MA Z j a I 1 I I I III I 13,30//57-61 12J/211-22 I I 12J/21-22 74/6-0 10 < I 4 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE I 11
INDEX MAP 5 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SCALE: 1" = 150' 6 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 7 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE
8 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE
9 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE
PL R/W CL R/W BDRY. CL PLZ 10 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 66' 48 16'± R/W 66' R/W 11 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE FLOT 'X' PL LANDSCAPE LOT/ CL 12 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE VARIES 33' I 33' 30' 18 PUBLIC UTILITY 13' 20 20 13 WALL n 13' 20' 20' 13' 2' 1 13.5' , 3.5' , 13' • 13' 5' LOT LINE 51' EASEMENT 9' 9' 16.25' 13 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE �,
I r
I �SID 5' 8'WALK LANDSCAPE _ 8' _ 12 I I - 6' i y 1' _ 17.25' 15' � RESIDENTIAL LOT = 1�5� � 14 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE L11j 2 2% (-PROP AC PAVEMENT EXIST.AC PAD TOP OF SLOPE I - I I o 1- I 15 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE w
PAVEMENT / PAD _ I I w I 16 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 27 x I� o 2° 22% 2% 4'RETAINING-/- 2% 2% 2% �\ Q\ I 2'1S o 17 3,525 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE y •
(O G cL
PROP.CURB& = Q-I 1= __ II I �� WALL \ AF co 18 5,511 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE EXIST.CURB& L TOE OF SLOPE \ J w GUTTER =1 rI ''=111=11 1- GUTTER PR 8"DW Q SIDEWALK �-FL PER PLAN \\ .. v 0 19 3,975 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE \\ 20 3,342 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE PR 12'X8'ROB \ SECTION A-A SECTION El-E1 \\ \Q// // 21 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE NTS NTSC 102"RCP \ / o p 22 3,397 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 6' \ / \
10'x9.5'BOX MIN \ // 23 4,454 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE /
1 24 3,960 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 25 3,344 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE
R/W CL R/W
N'LYI RTW S'LYI RTW SECTION L-L 15TH STREET - UTILITY CROSS-SECTION 26 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 48' 33' VARIES NTS NTS 27 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 24' I _ 24' 3' MIN 26' 5.5' 28 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 5' 19' I 19' 5' I VARIES 1 29 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE r 8' 8' I 2:1 MAX� 1.5' 30 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE PARKING PARKING 2%MIN ' 1 I 31 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE I -_
' 2% 2% I 2_%y 2% 2% 2% 32 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 1 PROPOSED1-111r., 33 3,353 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE Q \--SIDEWALK
RE MAX.

SIDEWALK
RET.WALL 34 3,326 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SECTION 'F-F' 35 3,355 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SECTION B-B NTS 36 3,464 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE NTS GENERAL NOTES: LOT SUMMARY: LEGEND 37 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE

1. EXISTING LAND USE: BASIN -PUBLIC UTILITIES(PU)FC-FLOOD CONTROL. DESCRIPTION TOTAL CENTER LINE 38 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE PL PL 2. EXISTING ZONING: SPECIAL PURPOSE-PUBLIC(PB). LOTS 1-65 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.4 AC FS FINISHED SURFACE 39 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 15' 15' HP HIGH POINT R/W CL R/W TEMP.CONST. i TEMP.CONST. 1 3. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: PUBLIC UTILITIES(PU) FC-FLOOD CONTROL. LETTERED LOTS: PRIVATE WAY(LOT A) 2.2 AC LP LOW POINT 40 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 21'
42' I
I 21' EXIST.SURFACE ESMT.
3' I PROP.PAD EXIST. ESMT. 4. PROPOSED LANDUSE: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; LETTERED LOTS: LANDSCAPE (LOTS B-J) 1.6 AC 41 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SURFACE I 5. UTILITY COMPANIES: TOTAL 9.2 AC R/W RIGHT OF WAY 42 3,337 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE _ \ I PROP. PAD GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 45 LOT NUMBER I- 5' 16' 16' 5' ELECTRICITY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1424.7 PAD ELEVATION 43 3,513 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE _ 8' 8' PROP.GRADING PROP,GRADING WATER: CITY OF UPLAND NOTE: COMBINED ACREAGE MAY NOT MEET 100 o/o OF THE TOTAL DUE PARKINGI PARKING I 3:1 SLOPE "' TO ROUNDING ERRORS. GAS EXISTING GAS LINE 44 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE ( ) (3:1 SLOPE) SEWER: CITY OF UPLAND REFUSE: BURRTEC WASTE INDUSTRIES - EXISTING STORM DRAIN 45 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE o PROP.CONCRETE SWALE PROP.CONCRETE SWALEJ 2' L CABLE TV: TIME WARNER CABLE 2% 2% 2% 2/0 (BE MAINTAINED BY UPLAND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: W EXISTING WATER LINE 46 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE (BE MAINTAINED BY UPLAND
r--�____ HILLS COUNTRY CLUB) HILLS COUNTRY CLUB) 6. FEMA FLOOD ZONE: ZONE X S EXISTING SEWER LINE 47 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SIDEWALK SIDEWALK 7. ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS: 1045-121-04 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, SECTION C-C SECTION H-H SECTION M-M IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AND IS - CENTER LINE 48 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE

8. GRADING FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE IS DEPENDENT ON MAINTAINING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: - - RIGHT OF WAY 49 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE NTS NTS NTS THE OPERATION OF THE EXISTING DETENTION BASIN AT ALL TIMES. THIS MAY BEING A PORTION OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND, IN THE CITY OF UPLAND, - - REQUIRE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED INLET/OUTLET STRUCTURES, STORM EASEMENT 50 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LABELED "REMAINDER DRAIN INFRASTRUCTURE,AND INTERIM GRADING TO RELOCATE BASIN RELATED PARCEL"AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 11631,AS PER MAP RECORDED IN LIMITS OF LEASE 51 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE PRIOR GRADING OF THE PROJECT SITE. DEVELOPER TO BOOK 158, PAGES 53 THROUGH 62 OF MAPS, INCLUSIVE THEREOF, IN THE PROPOSED STORM DRAIN R/W CL R/W 52 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING PLAN TO THE CITY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; BEING MORE 36' _ EXIST.TREE
OF GRADING OR OTHER PERMITS FOR THE PROJECT SITE. PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: S PROPOSED SEWER LINE 53 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 18' 18' PROTECT IN BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER PARCEL, SAID W PROPOSED WATER LINE 54 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE PLACE PL BASIS OF BEARINGS: POINT BEING ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF FIFTEENTH STREET \CYEXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 5' 13' 13' _ 5' I 15' 24" _ 55 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE __
TEMP.CONST. 1 - 15" 8" 1" THE BEARING OF N89°58'31"E ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF 15TH STREET,AS SHOWN (66.00 FEET IN FULL WIDTH),AS SHOWN ON SAID TRACT MAP;THENCE, LEAVING I
I EXIST. ESMT. -�- ON TRACT MAP No. 11631,AS PER M.B. 158/53-62, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND ALONG THE WESTERLY LOT LINE OF SAID PROPOSED STREET LIGHT 56 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SURFACE I 1.5y' OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,WAS USED AS THE REMAINDER PARCEL, NORTH 00°00'S2" EAST 219.80 FEET TO THE 57 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 2% 2% 2% -�- PROP.PAD I BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID REMAINDER PARCEL;THENCE ALONG THE 0 STORM DRAIN MANHOLE Q -L L
I NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID REMAINDER PARCEL, NORTH 89 57'44" EAST 879.81 58 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE �.- r - FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE;THENCE, CONTINUING 59 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SIDEWALK SIDEWALK PROP.GRADING �, ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE, NORTH 52°44'28" EAST 267.15 FEET TO AN IQ PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN (3:1 SLOPE) � � a a as I BENCH MARK:

ANGLE POINT IN SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE,CONTINUING ALONG SAID 60 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SECTION D-D PROP.CONCRETE SWALE Q 2 Q4.o CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK N0. 9D 86 NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 89045;00" EAST, 525.51 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE 61 3,807 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE (BE MAINTAINED BY UPLAND , DESCRIPTION: 2 CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER NORTHERLY LINE, SOUTH 00 07 06" EAST 240.74 FEET TO A POINT ON THE 7 NTS HILLS COUNTRY CLUB) OF A FCC CATCH BASIN, 64' N/O C/L 15th STREET AND 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS AVENUE. SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID REMAINDER PARCEL; THENCE,ALONG SAID SHALLOW STORM DRAIN COVER 62 3,572 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE SOUTHERLY LINE, NORTH 89°49'43"WEST 420.00 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT IN 63 3,572 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE ELEVATION: 1425.286' (CITY OF UPLANS LOCAL DATUM OF 1986) SAID SOUTHERLY LINE,THENCE SOUTH 00°07'06" EAST 139.84 FEET TO A POINT SECTION J-J WEDGE CURB AND GUTTER DETAIL ON SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE;THENCE,ALONG SAID NORTHERLY //Q/// PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN 64 3,572 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE R/W CL R/W NTS NTS ESTIMATED EARTHWORK R.G. QUANTITIES: RIGHT OF WAY LINE,SOUTH 89°58'33"WEST 1,198.79 FEET TO THE POINT OF / /// 65 3,563 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE 30'
48' j CUT 16,765 C.Y. (RAW) BEGINNING.

A 96,707 PRIVATE STREET HOA
FILL 80,926 C.Y. (RAW) B 3,505 OPEN SPACE/RFC HOA 18' EXIST.TREE SHEET INDEX: PROPOSED EASEMENTS:

I PROTECT IN Q C 2,250 OPEN SPACE/RFC HOA SHEET 1 TITLE SHEET
17' 13' I 13' 5' PLACE PL QA DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS. D 1,704 OPEN SPACE/RFC HOA E 15' SHEET 2 3 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SHEETS TEMP.CONST. i © DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS, EGRESS, E 27,928 OPEN SPACE/RFC HOA EXIST. ESMT. I
INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE&REPAIR PURPOSES. F 10,075 OPEN SPACE/RFC HOA

SURFACE
2% 2% 2% �2% -�_ 3' I PROP. PAD LAND OWNER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER: GEOTECHNICAL © DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES G 1,534 LANDSCAPE HOA ____TJ - - _ KB HOME MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GeoTek, Inc. (SEWER,WATER AND STORM DRAIN). H 17,353 LANDSCAPE HOA J PROP.GRADING _ 36310 INLAND VALLEY DRIVE SIDEWALK (3:1 SLOPE) 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE, SUITE 230 1548 NORTH MAPLE STREET OD. DENOTES A RESERVATION TO THE HOA FOR PRIVATE STORM DRAIN PURPOSES. I 1,900 OPEN SPACE HOA WILDOMAR, CA 92595 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 CORONA, CA 92880 SECTION E-E CONTACT: JONATHON SIEMSEN CONTACT: MARK BERTONE CONTACT: ANNA M. SCOTT J 586 LANDSCAPE HOA PROP.CONCRETE SWALE EO DENOTES A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF NTS (BE MAINTAINED BY UPLAND CELL: (714)884-1308 PHONE: (909)481-6322 PHONE: 951-710-1160 TRACT 20245. K 1,086 LANDSCAPE HOA HILLS COUNTRY CLUB) OFFICE: (951)691-5300 TOTAL 399,090 (9.16 ACRES) HOA I o
N

SECTION K-K
0 Z
NTS
PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF : DEVELOPER: 4 (it-6FM%* .� (((MADOLETENTATIVE TRACT MAP . SHEET 1No. 62183�� _ _ 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE.,SUITE 230 co ASSOCIATES INC.

RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 N O■ 20245 co
. Exp: 9-30-23 PHONE 909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX 909.481.6320 3 z aqT clviti 4�e OF �OI'CALI�� w REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION AARON T. SKEERS RCE 62183 DATE: CITY OF UPLAND a

J - PROPOSED EASEMENTS:
w
o GREEN A LU I 29
TR n rT n w E ;i1 © OA. DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS.

I .11l•J . ,,. I I V I GRASS
nn R-_ 1.5R/5�d�2 © DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS, EGRESS, Ailli) / I•`- INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE&REPAIR PURPOSES. (1� • .,�!. RED ;�tl.>_-��s,s:/1t -� ii - --i� © DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES o j ��� (SEWER,WATER AND STORM DRAIN).

GRASS 0t de, ----��.A , r -'- 7� OD. DENOTES A RESERVATION TO THE HOA FOR PRIVATE STORM DRAIN PURPOSES. / P `� •R• - 1"64 BUSH OE. DENOTES A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF /� ,��`,r ; e - rI - _-I` TRACT 20245. 1 41 5-r-
r o o , 5 /, �E ST.36 SD - 1' •� eta • LL■� - - - 0� ■� ■ CURVE TABLE o (MA INED BY UPLANDill/ >�HILLS C• RY CL = ,. -- o g- 1.- pi °. ■11■��■■■°ill GRASS . AND - e - . - ''a .✓ �•° �� ads%��:��■ ■_■_� �435, I jl ► �o ��� 10 '�� CURVE DELTA LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT ° o I OBSCURED 045-12 -1 7� ��," ,'�� • A•;��`-'�riga. N89°4500"W 34 EXIST. • EWER S .,/��/°.•v' , ��� �����'' errli ,. �� W „ ` M :21 16°21'01" 9.70' 34.00' 4.88'5 174) A ,.�� / �� ��� W 16 2101 9.70' 34.00' 4.88' /J `��\\�� 4,41, �r A(�� No. . 1 1435I& _ / �i •' / .:r/'�� ,.�1 �■■ -■ ... TW r\��c��`� 4111".( 4.`3. •
o 0 1435 / ��`':141 ,+� �� �`e. ', 11 C3 10 0107 87.43 500.00 43.83\ alh 0P IIMI°3° 1�8�� 3�(�2 OBSCURED 15 �� 3.53\ \ o. _ + _ - _ ; ; ; It `T.SEWER P` ak _ PROP.8 .,, , �e C4 9 11 17 80.18' 500.00 40.18 OVED) S0 / �� y� C;� W \ lglir 30 0 a.° -'. T BOUNDARY � - - 4� �� 0 ♦'®�0� 'B C6 89°56'53" 64.3T 41.00' 40.96' J� .. ���■■ T..l��t�7,ri •1 nn.. •1�� �����i.. �� ---- - �r II IA'=-� -_ -i i -w��- iYI1T1{� �i`�_'^ gy�IT M==M r/ YUER I�[10 �'�� ' �,�.�� _' \ \ U 36.00 �� P-1 .11111. - ( 1�_•�`` ���� �r►�,'�����: � ■fit: °- �n ■����� ■c���l� 1 6'.® \ . \�!�■ -- ��� ■� � �� , �,1 v' �•� ���.����� % ri� C8 52°46'43" 37.77' 41.00' 20.34' ���I �� 1 -l� �iU►�o\\� ���-,�■����� w�,_1■�izs� ��- M �' w�'7MI I ®I �� /�?`� i i 00 1 �_t-� j `ITh - . .� .li��■�r L _I y� Ayato -.iguip -.....a Ip- �` 7�aMI�� po mame2i�m"„,,,.1 I tli '�� \ ��♦ F, �� rri, 1M �9.0� irpr.,/�t'?'J:1fL404200 '� ���`I �sa�► - _ - = ��._ _ _ o = �� ��1 % p. ob ►P 1 opt O� 7.00' M C9 37 30'33" 130.93' 200.00' 67.91' 36yes - - - USH 1 '��S�` I ����� ��j�J' �0 C10 11°06'27" 58.16' 300.00' 29.17' 1045 621 36 ► , / I \ EXI' .r� ,� PPIMMINI111111.1,0-111.6 � • in 30.4 Mr!? ��►'1�►- •- ►0 [� n � 4MMIIM - I .. 4117 _ 114# i C11 78°20'20" 75.21' 55.00' 44.81' lgri FG !_�I �I. I`1 `y• -- - - - M� - - 0i Orn • te•�r� ���i •rm®rw■w.kaso o���win. f1 Arg � -' ■ P ��:I : r. ■JI� ' (? ■ eiree- �ina:1 .:�� .:1 j 1_iY'S����� -�1����■��(f111I��■-����■ . ■ ����1 '=- ��rr■■ ■-��_�■■ -�5.i�■■-�;� M_� ■■5- - ___ 2 =t7.4 I I ' � � �■I � � 25.5 ��� MITIVIMO � � 11 �-� 'r j wo�wir�o��_ .,l.r`� �� L o n no • A / riir.:� - - v�ai/ ; 1 0,044,,‘,„4, 37 I / I�r; Q o5i11111 • TE R� N D ► oIIIPLOT A0.5/0_ MI /// ' Iti-- ���I��I�����, I���n.111�_ �r��\ l-'1I1 O .. V�,� .89 57 44 E��7�' � I� ••�Si // / .� %`:i.LI.■472--� m, �-1, elk _ \ � L�Sa� �3a .�� t��� BR T- -��I ■■ 1 .. ..� 1- :- ' I: O MAO 4 ^ 44 J O O ' ;' I�ti D2/57 60 = i „ _ _ g1 z J �424.� PAD ELEVATION l'a
�� �' I �: ✓ -- - -- - ---- IliiiiiM - II �' GAS EXISTING GAS LINE 39 1 9' i ► ! ��,oj:� dui riii"i - -- - - -- 25 -_' -'� EXISTING STORM DRAIN 1045-621-39 - ---'--------'r^-��-- -----�.■i..■. �� � _- ,- =o 1 i =■■■■c■.iii .,i2 ■.iii '! l l 47.00' III lwlll Till/ nilll 47V-- 47.00' ' 11 !! 1 ll. i i 47.00' .10' 20.00' � �1:q1 l �R--�r-•,. '..�uIr - ■■■■moo ___ C Qr �� 5 lll��i►,.1 ri°!4 � � _ N89°5T44" :••.10' 11 1 11 11 0 11 W EXISTING WATER LINE EXIST. R/W 30.3 ItIil
WALL 11 LOTH �JTH H N89 5T44"E-866,00' FG •n - f ��II- ------------- - -- -- ----------- G - --_ _ --- - " •4.1T ii S EXISTING SEWER LINE -��� ���� '" � � 7 CENTER LINE EXIST.SD • _ -__-- - �.� - - II, -__ _ - - - RIGHT OF WAY ^'pro
�i e�ilisrre� =_ _ - :��_r.»�aa_.►w_r� �_■r � MINN- 7i _ ll�s�•�� 1 , a " ''�_, - - - - -; �' -� = - � _ �'�__ � JOIN EXIST. \�<�� ,��1��L-'�- - - �� �'�'SL_ - - - �_ :(Si) E lat _ S GAS - r�i GAS - EASEMENT _ - - �; . - - . - - - - - - - - �A� - co - - '� AS' 1 CURB&GUTTER -o- LIMITS OF LEASE
EXIST.WATER PROPOSED STORM DRAIN -0 �� � ';`�_ - ''-�' • 15TH EXIST.WATER PROP.84"SD - PUBLIC)J -- - l�I� `� rif 'ROP.8 im • ' � EXIST.WA �I�JJ _ SEWE I (PUBLIC) P. OE , ��� , _.. �_�i "I���■��� _ ' - �Sr��r� / rir ��r' i'Y - ■ W - W -- �r�r - - - - n � �,� tit !' L d� ���� .. S PROPOSED SEWER LINE - - II --_ - - _- �0 lb yri ���° - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1I LIJ EXIST.CURB IW PROPOSED WATER LINE &GUTTER Ir A &GUTTER CURB \ I II &GUT ER CURB EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT EXIST. RIW d I - g
W W c--4 PROPOSED STREET LIGHT El z z - I I = b 'TRACT Ho. g6770o IM. o o 13 /577-61 Q W I I I TRACT Ho. B6710o M° o ° 13 3/5741 I H W I O STORM DRAIN MANHOLE YG°La �]OO ° 0° (�jo 7100 /1 I J I PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN IM1. o ° 133 357741 ,. ' II a

II W
I It
ILL JOIN EXIST.8"SEWER
@ EXIST.MH Q PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE i

SHALLOW STORM DRAIN COVER

PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN
ST. ELIAS WAY
I 1 TRACT Ho. 1646g IMI. 0 . 0,00 2/5 7=600 \� Q p o o B V ��, , , �, 71 b�s' : 421 �8.; 44 3 7 4 3 2 1 I o Q W �V�aC� �]o° 6�6g �� 54 143c 6 31 I � aC� �10° 6�6gr.B. 300 �0�71�600 < t ]°3° 300 �D�77�600 PI r h 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 =1 ..�' Z I 1- - ,,/l_ _ i - - - - - �/-- ,,,y EXIST.SD - - 39 a _ / / G \ 1045-621-39 17 `;' �=����,■�., • EXIST.ELECTRIC �, - «+��,� - - \ EXIST. RIW F EXIST. RIW 30.3 •��' WA L LL a \\ - --=H TREAT- - • /:�W _ �- _ _ _ 1_ I_ a FG = - __ CO 1 � - - - - - - - -- 15T 8°53S E 145.10- N89°5°'49"E �L� - _ _ _ - _ o , T �,\ .t.•44► i ®� n ,sue ��
- ___ _ _ N7 19"_ o S _�-iligpr CROP.ENTR /EXIT GATE -. PROP.CL - - �L1_, .r.��® 7® a _ -kPUBL1C) EXIST.SEWER-- ' M�■I M ° �. i I _ _ M D .° ° u K-' �.� �.v� W EXIST.CL _ C1 C2 N•9 5949E 157.13 �, C3 EXIST. SD /i ����X
EXIST.CL �°-�/
• ��J ° _ EXIST.SD--\ -"-"- alliff CO
Q - N89°59'49"E 236.3T C10 - EXIST.WATER ___ -1 =- ff - - - - - C4- - - - - - - - s - - - -- OLD 15TH ST.C � �T - _ a • PROP.CL r W
0 Irv;, , I_ __�-___ \ o a �- � EXIST.WAT �. SEVV ■ I I 1 n ° 6 I- - - - II II ° m --EXIST. FENCE /i • c = °M s a . ° ,� gv C iw�-Li .j co ❑ ° II ❑ I o EXIST.WATER o �- - - Q 4 i �`�. /
'r 0 -- II - t/ - - - - - 8- 0 - -fl n O - O T O e -- V�I d --EXIST.CURB I F _� &GUTTERlei EXIST. RIW - ---- --�
I EXIST. R/W LIMITS OF LEASE EXIST RIW t S LIMITS OF LEASE -' EXIST. FENCE O W I I / INSTR. N0.2004 05a0916 INSTR. NO.2004-0590916 ° / 8/1612004 8/16/2004 Z Z ° / TRACT [boo WIG III z w 0 / / Flo 0 . 13 /51-6`1 -� -W- I 0 ° / / / II I o
II
w
J
Q
C)
aga.

IT

SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 120
N
o
d
z
c)
PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF : DEVELOPER: ig°s TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ■ SHEET 2 L.,
At NmADoLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE.,SUITE 230o No. 62183� Q� RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 & ASSOCIATES, INC_. N O■ 20245 * Exp: 9-30-23 * PHONE 909.481.6322 �� co Engineering Communities for Life FAX 909.481.6320 3 z Q\CIVIL 4+ OF 1- �0F CALiF�
REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION AARON T. SKEERS RCE 62183 DATE: CITY OF UPLAND a ._

/ 1435.8111‘ , 1�0_ U " ° D H L C U .' C L U �� 1435.E �� 1 LOT - � '� , 1� ,,,,A,4„ • 145- - -1 , , X °4�5 O Q X7 1438.2 I 1434.3 1434.9XX1430.1101440 TRACT NI.- 631 `�� �' 111 74
�� � TEE X
° 1438.2 illaill**-,
ST �435 � J
IVII.U. I .)�l�l "m v-
PROP T 10
��,� ,r :111iik„ 111114wmak Afr iii I A h b ri 1 1 b lir laisolislull 'i p ,3`j 1433.7 X 1430.4 Vii MD 28.0 w--�`jh, - Idh-
1430- PRo Y - r 7 (29.0) OBSCURED irST. PL 4111 FG N89°45'00"W 525.51'T FG _ „ __ _ _ _ _ IQ _ - OBSCURED _ ���r 1 '''''llikill11111111111111
_ -glir 1430 430

7.00' 47.00' - , .00M-' 111 „'47.011 '"it_ -47.00: _ _ irlyin1 ral 47,.01' -- - _� - ---- _ - _=�, - = - - _ - - - - v -- = - T - _ - -_ ----- - - w� �■a�>_..�. 1 I Imo■ �� `� ��� � -,.-�'�� �- iis�� wi=Il.�a.�..�=��w ws�r = ce - - .. ....../...-411,0110..--- 1-1 ___-.....isram...--__ _....... ...762......--_--.2.__ ____im__ ,_...., •
______
�- 1♦� ..._
�1� ��,, A r
t� _ , _ VI -,�__ � I I I I I I I -I I I ■_��.

Ate. �-
„.,,,,,,,.. i__ ...
___ , ,
_........._ ...„...........
p",,,,,„,,,,_
0 ........„......, ..........„...„
r ,� 1 ti �ff� II\�� I I I I IAllirab, -----411\VA. "r.EN .7141 igillan _ Ar "or__ __ ____--______ , . ___ _...:.,. ..,,,,,,,,uoh7.1roh, _ A __,„ ___53.m.rwinii imm.... , ,,_, , _ lo, 1°14. ' AIRIPAIT =-•a�4�rf. I y II - - - It� !� -am PEAPilw _. _ Clial. 1414.7 1418.4 `■ 7.60` - �� ■n ~1���7�D4fr- f° ► rL■ -pPIIIIII ■n ■ ■ .�` • ' ';.i * .�! 1 1 ■ - I ` �r I I X74715.2 1415.4 1415 i 1416.7 °114, ■ s Iltli■erlaiTnt ��lorium uirilM ■ii singi�l,��r�alouirail d_ I I ne .- I j vv ■7 10.Enni .l■s -ja an.am miw---- n�wi�=�����s I I \ 1414.4 �' X l 14.7 X 1� �►��■■��■11■ ■�■�■■���� 28.2 �� ■�a�Z�\\v=1® III 1 a 7, 1 _� ` FS �1 p ���� 628.89 4.9X X 14 '4) /,,,,,, 1416.1 •1-_1 '45'10°W 3104/111M i]��/�IMIT f AY d I - 141 1 - � I III' ��-�:11:
���� l���»� I� N P R 0 AS1 N G � �' �.9 IMMEM11.111 -
_ � � --PROP. HEADWALL STRUCTURE � _ 1415.2 .1 �:::= LO P������ III ,1414.' 1j I �� , 741 4 �1I IhI� - I `I• --- ROP. HEADWAL STRUCTUR X 4�,j I a �� 1. _-����_ r - X I 1415.2 I I / I 1414. 1415 ' X 1417.9 I�� I P
�a� .v0° a ,. OM 1■ O�' .�� ��� I I 1-F•�-1.14 I �� " r Z,X -47f10L - • • -471,:_ il��l -ate 47:00' - " -30fl0'- - X 1416.6 • ■ _.r.�,MIK ��� �, - I �� I NOTE:
___ _ oil _ _ i � A SEPARATE GRADING PLAN FOR THE �ilk
�� ------- ; W' ��r �_ �. \� :�=i'•i'w' ►`►��A�T\ ��� ■� -- ��.� �i16u Ab_ i, - WHOLE BASIN WILL BE SUBMITTED 1 ' --_mi �� fl■II■F �a•�. C:e- �� �dr i�■iiiii����r]�tii�wilriiirionwisiiri I- '� _ > , -- Imam D �.+-a .n�.■ ■1.■ _ , _'--�.r �_=� 11._ ��i.�...������ - _ - - �� - ----------------- -- -- - 1 INCORPORATING RECOMMENDATIONS - - - I - - - -�� � • A 7i - �spTLTi t•1 ^.� • •LqicIMILI= \�iY _p�1�1�� rrY�1- ■..��.��� .-_-� • • • • ram- I I r "�L. •NM 1_ �•� r_����r�,� _ �� _ • �� r,:tip._ ;_;_,_ __ I BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER I r-� S, )it- L�■I III_ --- - ? -__ � 7u■[ ■� � 1 1Ilur I 1 JSH �1��� 1• 5 ��. 1 ��� �TZ,r2_ft,W �11111 - _ - - I 1 1 ■ram-�.�..Bilm M 1 f . r -r. I _�� r I I mono �',171ne•� o•• POP. 10x9:�- 4��Itf.,�= _� ffA ��� ��� L• "• � 1 �i� Iiti. > + II W w
a ' ' I J IW II II W I I > IZ Q SE) I Q > 1 II z > I W w
� I Q III Q I� Q II I
I
PROPOSED EASEMENTS: LEGEND
CURVE TABLEq CENTER LINE
OA DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS. FS FINISHED SURFACE CURVE DELTA LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT HP HIGH POINT DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR STORM DRAIN, INGRESS, EGRESS, LP LOW POINT INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE& REPAIR PURPOSES. Cl 16°21'01" 9.70' 34.00' 4.88' R/W RIGHT OF WAY
DENOTES EASEMENT TO CITY OF UPLAND FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES C2 16°21'01" 9.70' 34.00' 4.88' 45 LOT NUMBER (SEWER,WATER AND STORM DRAIN). C3 10°01'07" 87.43' 500.00' 43.83' 1424.7 PAD ELEVATION OD. DENOTES A RESERVATION TO THE HOA FOR PRIVATE STORM DRAIN PURPOSES. C4 9°11'17" 80.18' 500.00' 40.18' GAS EXISTING GAS LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN
O DENOTES A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF C5 90°48'47" 60.23' 38.00' 38.54' TRACT 20245. W - EXISTING WATER LINE C6 89°56'53" 64.37' 41.00' 40.96' EXISTING SEWER LINE C7 90°00'00" 54.98' 35.00' 35.00' - CENTER LINE C8 52°46'43" 37.77' 41.00' 20.34' - - RIGHT OF WAY

EASEMENT
C9 37°30'33" 130.93' 200.00' 67.91'
LIMITS OF LEASE o
d-

PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
S PROPOSED SEWER LINE II
W PROPOSED WATER LINE

EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
0--3#-
PROPOSED STREET LIGHT v
O STORM DRAIN MANHOLE V
J PROPOSED STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN
IT
Q PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
7 SHALLOW STORM DRAIN COVER

SCALE IN FEET
0 40 80 120
Lo
j jj j j j PROPOSED INFILTRATION BASIN HH .M1 o N
O
Z
PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF : DEVELOPER: 1 vg.OFESSZA
°s TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ■ SHEET 3 UJ �� CADOLE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE.,SUITE 230 o No. 62183�g RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 & ASSOCIATES, INC_. N O. 20245CO * Exp: 9-30-23 * PHONE 909.481.6322 co �� Engineering Communities for Life FAX 909.481.6320 3 z "Q\civil 4� OF , c_,
REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION AARON T. SKEERS RCE 62183 DATE: CITY OF UPLANDCt a_

CITY OF UPLAND
11 II
GENERAL NOTES FOR GRADING PLANS ROUGH GRADING & 210 1) ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 15.52 OF THE UPLAND MUNICIPAL 31) GRADING AND EXCAVATION SHALL BE HALTED DURING PERIODS OF HIGH WINDS. ACCORDING CODE AND ANY SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. A COPY OF THE APPROVED TO AQMD MEASURE F-4, HIGH WINDS ARE DEFINED AS 30 MPH OR GREATER. THIS LEVEL E R I N N T R L P LA N c_)„, J
GRADING PLAN SHALL BE RETAINED ON THE JOB SITE WHILE WORK IS IN PROGRESS. OCCURS ONLY UNDER EXTREME CONDITIONS, SUCH AS SANTA ANA WIND CONDITIONS. USE A No / PL'14/0 C WHEN REFERENCED ON THE PLANS,A COPY OF CITY OF UPLAND STANDARD PLANS WATER TRUCK FOR DUST CONTROL. TRACT N O . 20245 �SoR SHALL ALSO BE RETAINED ON THE SITE. 32) HE CIVIL ENGINEER,AS A CONDITION OF ROUGH GRADE APPROVAL, SHALL PROVIDE A BLUE TOP 0 _ 16TH ST 2) GRADING SHALL NOT BE STARTED WITHOUT FIRST NOTIFYING THE CITY OF UPLAND PUBLIC WITH ACCOMPANYING WITNESS STAKE, SET AT THE CENTER OF EACH PAD REFLECTING THE PAD \ Q w WORKS INSPECTOR AT(909)291-2963. A PRE-GRADING MEETING ON THE SITE IS REQUIRED ELEVATION FOR PRECISE PERMITS AND A BLUE TOP WITH WITNESS STAKE SET AT THE 15TH ST BEFORE START OF GRADING WITH THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PRESENT:OWNER, GRADING DRAINAGE SWALE HIGH POINT REFLECTING THE HIGH POINT ELEVATION FOR ROUGH GRADING (CC14TH ST CONTRACTOR, DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER, SOILS ENGINEER, ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST,AND PERMITS. IT g 113TH ST `c PROJECT SITE CITY INSPECTOR.THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS FOR GRADING WILL BE EXPLAINED AT THIS 33) THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST SHALL PERFORM PERIODIC INSPECTIONS AND SUBMIT A w MEETING. SCHEDULE 72 HRS. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS. COMPLETE REPORT AND MAP UPON COMPLETION OF THE ROUGH GRADING. w� FOOTHILL BLVD Q ________)1111 34) THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE TO THE APPROVED a 'o 3) ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR PERMITS GRADING PLAN BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL. .EE SHEET 4 QcC o
FROM OTHER AGENCIES WITH REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITIES FOR CONSTRUCTION 35) IN THE EVENT THAT SOIL CONTAMINATION IS DISCOVERED DURING EXCAVATION OR REMOVAL SEE SHEET 5 SEE SHEET 6 U Q ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK AUTHORIZED ON THIS PLAN. TRACT BOIRY SILVCRADO WAY 10 z OF AN EXISTING TANK IS NECESSARY,WORK SHALL BE STOPPED UNTIL A SITE ASSESSMENT ( BASIN ) ( BASIN ) 4) THE GRADING PERMIT AND AN APPROVED COPY OF THE GRADING PLAN SHALL BE ON THE AND MITIGATION PLAN HAS BEEN PREPARED, SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY COUNTY OF SAN \-\ ` 011 PERMITTED SITE WHILE WORK IS IN PROGRESS. BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. o T ACT NO. 20245 -- IF ONWOOD PLACE 5) PRELIMINARY SOIL AND GEOLOGY REPORTS AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS ARE 36) THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING TO THE CITY PROOF THAT A NOTICE , - I I n VICINITY MAP CONSIDERED A PART OF THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN. OF INTENT(N01)FOR THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH ? -fei COYOTE RUN DRIVE NTS CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN FILED WITH AND APPROVED BY THE STATE WATER a z '--� TRACT BOUNDARY 6) THE SOILS ENGINEER AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST SHALL PERFORM SUFFICIENT RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT COMMENCE WITHOUT THIS Q j S SHEET 3 Q INSPECTIONS AND BE AVAILABLE DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION TO VERIFY APPROVAL. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH THE GENERAL v < _ , N pn
COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND THE CODE WITHIN THEIR PURVIEW. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY STORM WATER PERMIT BY IMPLEMENTING THEIR STORM WATER — ` ` INNi\ 7) THE CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL BE AVAILABLE DURING GRADING TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR THE DURATION OF THE PROJECT. ;r -.-\, 7Cal THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, CODE AND ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT WITHIN CL 5 th STREET THEIR PURVIEW. SURVEY MONUMENT NOTE
8) AREAS TO RECEIVE FILL SHALL BE PROPERLY PREPARED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY SURVEY MONUMENTS THAT EXIST AS SHOWN ON RECORDED MAPS, HIGHWAY MAPS, OR POINTS THE SOIL ENGINEER BEFORE PLACING FILL. THAT PROVIDE SURVEY CONTROL WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA, SHALL BE LOCATED AND FERNANDO 13th ALTA MONTE VERDE GROVE 9) FILLS SHALL BE BENCHED INTO COMPETENT MATERIAL AS REQUIRED BY THE SOILS REFERENCED BY A LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR OR REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER(AUTHORIZED AVENUE AVENUE AVENUE AVENUE AVENUE ENGINEER. TO PRACTICE LAND SURVEYING). BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, CORNER RECORDS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR. THESE CORNER RECORDS SHALL DESCRIBE THE 10) ALL EXISTING FILLS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER OR REMOVED BEFORE MONUMENTS FOUND WITH TIE DISTANCES TO REFERENCE POINTS FOR THE RESETTING OF A INDEX MAP PLACING ADDITIONAL FILLS. SURVEY MONUMENT. WHEN CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET AND SCALE: 1"=200' 11) FILLS SHALL BE COMPACTED THROUGHOUT TO A MINIMUM OF 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION. CORNER RECORDS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE COUNTY SURVEYOR SHOWING THE NEW AGGREGATE BASE FOR ASPHALTIC AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% MONUMENTS.

RELATIVE COMPACTION. MAXIMUM DENSITY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC 2013 B, CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR SAFETY CONSTRUCTION NOTES QUANTITIES:

SECTION 1804.
12) CUT AND FILL SLOPES SHALL BE NO STEEPER THAN 2-FOOT HORIZONTAL TO 1-FOOT IN SUBMITTING A BID FOR THIS WORK,THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LEGEND: 0 CONSTRUCT MODIFIED CURB&GUTTER TYPE A(12"CURB/48"GUTTER) VERTICAL(2:1)EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED OTHERWISE. COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOBSITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF PER CITY STD.PLAN NO.CUR 2. 1,665 L.F.

THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY,THAT THIS REQUIREMENT BEING A SUBDIVISION OF THE REMAINDER PARCEL AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO. 11631,AS PER FF=104.03 FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TRACT BOUNDARY 13) ALL CUT SLOPES SHALL BE INVESTIGATED BOTH DURING AND AFTER GRADING BY THE SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS,AND THAT THE MAP FILED IN BOOK 158, PAGES 53 THROUGH 62, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS,ALL WITHIN SECTION 5, PAD=103.36 PAD ELEVATION T Y — SLOPE,2:1 MAX.

ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST TO DETERMINE IF ANY SLOPE STABILITY PROBLEM EXISTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER,THE ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF SHOULD EXCAVATION DISCLOSE ANY GEOLOGICAL HAZARDS OR POTENTIAL UPLAND AND ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CF CURB FACE HEIGHT OF-WAY
TW RIGTO T-O H ROW CALIFORNIA. RIGHT-OF-WAY HAZARDS,THE ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST SHALL SUBMIT RECOMMENDED ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, WALL ELEVATION O INDICATES CONSTRUCTION NOTE — — DIRECTION OF FLOW
TREATMENT TO THE CITY INSPECTOR FOR APPROVAL.

LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER,THE ENGINEER,OR THE CITY OF GF GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 14) ALL TRENCH BACKFILLS SHALL BE TESTED AND APPROVED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER UPLAND AND ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. NOTE: RIM MANHOLE RIM ELEVATION PROPOSED SCREEN WALL PERSEPARATE PERMIT.

PER THE GRADING CODE. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS PERFORMING WORK SHOWN ON OR RELATED TO THESE ADD 1400.00'TO ALL DESIGN ELEVATIONS ON PLANS. FL FLOW LINE FF FINISH FLOOR ® PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PER
15) ANY EXISTING IRRIGATION LINES AND CISTERNS SHALL BE REMOVED OR CRUSHED IN PLANS SHALL CONDUCT THEIR OPERATIONS SO THAT THE EMPLOYEES ARE PROVIDED A SAFE PLACE FG FINISH GRADE SEPARATE PERMIT.

PLACE AND APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR AND SOILS ENGINEER. TO WORK AND THE PUBLIC IS PROTECTED. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL ESTIMATED GRADING CONSTRUCTION DATES: HP FLOW LINE HIGH POINT 7335�- - EXISTING CONTOUR COMPLY WITH THE"OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS"OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT FS FINISH SURFACE 16) ANY EXISTING WATER WELLS SHALL BE ABANDONED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OF LABOR AND WITH"CONSTRUCTION SAFETY ORDERS."THE CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE GB GRADE BREAK 1.0' INDICATES EXTRA DEPTH FOOTING SPECIFICATIONS APPROVED BY SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC RESPONSIBLE IN ANY WAY FOR THE CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR'S COMPLIANCE WITH SAID START : NOVEMBER 15, 2021 INV INVERT HEALTH. REGULATION AND ORDERS. FINISH : JANUARY 15, 2022 TC TOP OF CURB PAD INDICATES PAD ELEVATION INDICATES STREET LIGHT 17) ANY EXISTING CESSPOOLS AND SEPTIC TANKS SHALL BE ABANDONED IN COMPLIANCE TG TOP OF GRATE WITH THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE TO THE APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. ENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR 24-HR CONTACT: TRW TOP OF TOP OF RETAININGN WALL O INDICATES ONSITE STREET LIGHT A SEPARATE PERMIT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY BUILDING DEPARTMENT. n THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON DAVE HAUGEN 4"R 4 INCH RISER 18) THE CITY INSPECTOR, BEFORE EXCAVATION, SHALL APPROVE STOCKPILING OF EXCESS THESE PLANS ARE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS;TO THE BEST OF OUR EDF EXTRA DEPTH FOOTING 0 INDICATES ONSITE LIGHT POLE MATERIAL. (909)730-1979 CL CENTERLINE KNOWLEDGE,THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT INDICATES EXISTING POWER POLE 19) EXPORT SOIL MUST BE TRANSPORTED TO A LEGAL DUMP OR TO A PERMITTED SITE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. LINES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.THE CONTRACTOR FURTHER ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY AND NOTE: INDICATES GARAGE FLOOR RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS OR STRUCTURES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON 0 42'1,�� ELEVATION DIFFERENCE 20) THE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT A HAUL ROUTE PLAN TO THE CITY ENGINEER WHEN A. ALL HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT USED ON THE PROJECT SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THESE DRAWINGS.

EARTH AND/OR DEBRIS IS TRANSPORTED TO OR FROM A PERMITTED SITE ON PUBLIC IN GOOD OPERATING CONDITION,WITH ALL INTERNAL COMBUSTION, ENGINE-DRIVEN INDICATES WATERLINE GATE VALVE ROADWAYS. THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE EQUIPMENT FITTED WITH INTAKE AND EXHAUST MUFFLERS THAT ARE IN GOOD CONDITION. 21) THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL MEASURES. JOB SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT; INCLUDING B. ALL MOBILE OR FIXED NOISE PRODUCING EQUIPMENT USED ON THE PROJECT SITE THAT IS ADA PATH OF TRAVEL SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY;THAT THIS SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE REGULATED FOR NOISE OUTPUT BY A LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL AGENCY SHALL COMPLY 22) THE PERMITTEE SHALL GIVE REASONABLE NOTICE TO THE OWNER OF THE ADJOINING LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS;AND THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY,AND WITH SUCH REGULATION WHILE IN THE SOURCE OF PROJECT ACTIVITY. EARTHWORK QUANTITIES [2 67'1 RETAINING WALL HEIGHT TOP WALL TO LANDS AND BUILDINGS BEFORE BEGINNING EXCAVATIONS,WHICH MAY AFFECT THE HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, LATERALS AND SUBJACENT SUPPORT OF THE ADJOINING PROPERTY. THE NOTICE SHALL IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY C. WHERE FEASIBLE, USE ELECTRICALLY POWERED EQUIPMENT INSTEAD OF PNEUMATIC OR CUT(RAW) - 16,765 CY TOP OF FOOTING.

STATE THE INTENDED DEPTH OF EXCAVATION AND WHEN THE EXCAVATION WILL ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. INTERNAL COMBUSTION POWERED EQUIPMENT. FILL(RAW) - 80,926 CY INDICATES AC MECHANICAL UNIT LAND OWN ER/DEVELOPER J
COMMENCE. THE PERMITTEE OR HIS AGENT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE ` CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND SHALL REPORT ALL D. ALL STATIONARY NOISE-GENERATING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LOCATED AS FAR AWAY A KB HOME CAUSED BY HIS/HER GRADING ACTIVITIES. DISCREPANCIES TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. IT IS THE POSSIBLE FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY LINES. 23) SLOPES EXCEEDING 5 FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL BE PLANTED WITH AN APPROVED PLANT RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. 36310 INLAND VALLEY DRIVE MATERIAL. IN ADDITION, SLOPES EXCEEDING 15 FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL BE PROVIDED BEGINNING OF WORK MEANS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS. E. POST SIGNS PROHIBITING UNNECESSARY IDLING OF INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES. WILDOMAR, CA 92595 WITH AN APPROVED IRRIGATION SYSTEM UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CITY F. THE USE OF NOISE PRODUCING SIGNALS, INCLUDING HORNS,WHISTLES,ALARMS,AND CONTACT: JONATHON SIEMSEN ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL N.P.D.E.S. REQUIREMENTS. BELLS WILL BE FOR SAFETY WARNING PURPOSES ONLY. CELL: (714)884-1308 24) SANITARY FACILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON THE SITE. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST TO FINISH GRADE ALL MANHOLE RIMS,WATER VALVE BOXES, UTILITY OFFICE: (951)691-5300 Z BOXES AND LIDS, ETC. NOTE: 0 25) THE LOCATION AND PROTECTION OF ALL UTILITIES IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL THE NECESSARY PIPE FITTINGS TO COMPLETE THE WORK. DECLARATION OF ENGINEER OF RECORD: RETAINING WALLS TO BE BUILT PER SEPARATE PLAN AND H PERMITTEE. I HEREBY DECLARE THAT IN MY PROFESSIONAL OPINION,THE DESIGN OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AS ENGINEER: GEOTECHNICAL U THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR PERMIT. 26) ALL WATER VALVES AND SEWER MANHOLES SHALL REMAIN ACCESSIBLE AND FREE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS COMPLIES WITH THE CURRENT PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES, INC. GeoTek, Inc. p OF DEBRIS THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF THE PROJECT. UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS.ALL CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUST BE STANDARDS AND PRACTICES. AS THE ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE DESIGN OF 9302 PITTSBURGH AVENUE,SUITE 230 1548 NORTH MAPLE STREET Ce REQUESTED IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THESE IMPROVEMENTS, I ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH DESIGN. I UNDERSTAND AND RANCHO 91730 CA 92880 1— 27) INSTALL 3/4"PLYWOOD FALSE BOTTOMS IN ALL SEWER MANHOLES WITHIN THE CUCAMONGA, CA. CORONA, QUANTITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE PROVIDED FOR PERMIT AND BONDING PURPOSES ONLY. ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THE PLAN CHECK OF THESE PLANS BY THE CITY OF UPLAND IS A REVIEW cn CONSTRUCTION AREA. (CHECKED DAILY BY INSPECTOR). CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THEIR OWN QUANTITIES PRIOR TO BIDDING FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF ENSURING THAT THESE PLANS COMPLY WITH CITY STANDARD AND CONTACT: MARK BERTONE CONTACT: ANNA M. SCOTT Z 28) PROVIDE TRAP AT FIRST MANHOLE DOWNSTREAM OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCREPANCIES IN FINAL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES AND ORDINANCES. THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS IS NOT A PHONE: (909)481-6322 PHONE: 951 710 1160 0 29) PEFFRAFIEV061-MitteklgOIRES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS SHALL CONSTRUCTION QUANTITIES. DETERMINATION OF THE TECHNICAL ADEQUACY OF THE DESIGN OF THE IMPROVEMENTS. SUCH NOTE: GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO.2481-CR 0 BE USED TO PROTECT ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING GRADING. PLAN CHECK DOES NOT THEREFORE RELIEVE ME OF MY DESIGN RESPONSIBILITY. ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A PREPARED BY GeoTek, Inc.

NOTE: SEPTEMBER 3,2020 AS THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, I AGREE TO DEFEND AND INDEMNIFY THE CITY OF UPLAND, ITS CALIFORNIA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR. ANY REQUIRED SIGNATURE: Ce 30) GRADING OPERATIONS, INCLUDING MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT, SHALL BE OFFICER, ITS AGENTS,AND ITS EMPLOYEES FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, CLAIMS, DAMAGES, OR CERTIFICATIONS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND CERTIFIED BY BASIS OF BEARINGS DATE: O0 CONDUCTED BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 7 A.M.AND 3:30 P.M. MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. THE UNDERSIGNED DESIGN CIVIL ENGINEER WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROFESSIONAL INSPECTIONS INJURIES TO ANY PERSON OR PROPERTY ARISING FROM NEGLIGENT ACT, ERRORS OR OMISSIONS LICENSE NUMBER:

NO WORK SHALL BE ALLOWED ON WEEKENDS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3317 OF THE CA BUILDING CODE. OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, HIS EMPLOYEES, HIS AGENTS OR HIS CONSULTANTS. THE CALIFORNIA LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR. THE BEARING OF N89°58'31"E ALONG THE A. ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT, FIXED OR MOBILE, OPERATED WITHIN CENTERLINE OF 15TH STREET,AS SHOWN ON 0 1,000 FEET OF A DWELLING SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH PROPERLY OPERATING AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL STATEMENT TRACT MAP No. 11631,AS PER M.B. 158/53-62, Z MAINTAINED MUFFLERS.

INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF THE COUNTY
B. ALL OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF UPLAND NOISE ORDINANCE THIS GRADING PLAN WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CBC SIGNATURE: DATE: OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,WAS o (CHAPTER 4.5, UNNECESSARY NOISE.) (LATEST ED.)AND CHAPTER 15.52 OF THE UPLAND MUNICIPAL CODE.THE SITE GRADING AND ALL STATEMENT OF THE CITY ENGINEER USED AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP.

APPLICABLE DETAILS AND PROVISIONS OF SERIES CU-E OF THE STANDARD DRAWINGS OF THE CITY N C. STOCKPILING AND/OR VEHICLE STAGING AREAS SHALL BE LOCATED AS FAR AS OF UPLAND,WITH SERIES ED-E OF THE ENGINEERING DIRECTIVES,AND WITH ANY CITY OF UPLAND LICENSE NUMBER: C36637 BY APPROVING THIS PLAN, I HEREBY ACCEPT THIS GRADING PLAN &TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL a_ PRACTICABLE FROM DWELLINGS AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF GRADING PERMIT. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CONCERNING GRADING. IN MY OPINION,ADEQUATE PROVISIONS HAVE PLAN AS MEETING THE PREREQUISITE FOR ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT AND FOR RECORD BEEN MADE FOR THE DRAINAGE OF SURFACE WATERS FROM EACH BUILDING SITE. PURPOSES. THIS GRADING PLAN WAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A FULLY QUALIFIED SHEET INDEX: 6 PROFESSIONAL WHO HAS STATED THAT THE PLAN CONFORMS TO ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF z Underground Service Alert e rt MADOLE AND ASSOCIATES: THE CITY. THE DESIGN, ELEVATIONS, DETAILS AND FEATURES OF THE ONSITE GRADING HAVE NOT SHEET 1 TITLE SHEET Q g BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CITY, EXCEPT AS THEY RELATE TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN ADJACENT SHEET 2 ROUGH GRADING SECTIONS RIGHT OF WAYS AND EASEMENTS. SHEET 3-6 ROUGH GRADING SHEETS CALL SHEET 7-10 EROSION CONTROL 7* TOLL FREE WENDELL L. IWATSURU NOTE: CD C'
���� g 1 CNI EXPIRES: 06-30-22 ALL GRADING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE o
i WITH THE CITY OF UPLAND'S CU-E SERIES STANDARD z DRAWINGS AND ED-E OF THE ENGINEERING DIRECTIVES. "AT RISK " ,..) ..TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG , WDID: 8 36C395058 Q cL
CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO. 9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT co ��cioEssiav CITY OF UPLAND TM20245 DESCRIPTION: MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP'VDfir �, y �, 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN MA DO L E _�" TG<c DESIGNED BY:

THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC � 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE.,SUITE 730 3 No. 36637 c DATE 1 QQ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU TRACT NO. 20245 CATCH BASIN, 64' N/O C/L 15th STREET AND _ Oc ASSOCIATES, INC- PHONE:909.481.6322 Exp: 06-30-22 CHECKED BY: RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12 31 22 oz 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS AVENUE. Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 10 SHEETS /\ ,rVz� ���• WLI CD

ROUGH GRADING PLAN
FOFCPILIF� RECOMMENDED BY: DRAWING NO. w DATE: 1986 TITLE SHEET ELEV: 1425.286' WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION GP 21-08

P/L
I
16'f
2'
EXI T. EXIST.

N'LY R/W S'LY R/W
PAD I 66'
CL 33' TRACT Ma 11631 TBY. ••� E 33 P/L CL P/L / XISTING GOLF COURSE ± TRACT NO. 20475 le
13' 9.5' 1 30.5' 13' 18' 18' 1 - — - Q 15' WIDE TEMPORARY

0.5 5 /12 7.5 /0.5 - 5' __ 13' __ 13' 5 5 CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT I y1 - 4' TUBULAR STEEL 4'f I EXISTING GRADE I FENCE ON RETAINING LEVEL LINE I - �- EXISTING TREE SPLIT FACE BLOCKS .......__-_ _ - �; PAD PAD - Ji _ 5:1 MAX \\ --____ _ 2% 2% 2% / - VARIES 4'rr-- I _� Lcoc.

L
'---1 �' 1.0 WEDGE CURB ' _ _ _1 CONC. :.. -
SIDEWALK -
, _ +I
L_J CONC. WEDGE CURB PROP. 1' CURB __/ '`' \L 225' ROUGH GRADE LINE 43.5' SIDEWALK �� �� W/ 4' GUTTER 0'S' - I [ PAD SECTION D - D � �
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS - ���-111IIIII
PER CITY CONST. STANDARD NO SCALE =1 I II I III III1111 I I I„I 11= SECTION " A- A" SECTION "G-GA NO SCALE SCALE: 1"=5' NORTH SOUTH P/L P/L P/L TRACT
48' BDRY. P/L P/L 50'f 59' ,
I _ 10 I
I - 19' CL 19' - I EXISTING BLOCK -\ LOT "A"CL1 I I 5' 5' _ 5' 5' WALL 17' 13' 13' 5' 11' -1-1' - -1.- - 2' I -- — I LOT "J" 6"CURB &
PAD 1_, f,IST HOUSE
PAD 1:1 MAX. GUTTER AC PAVEMENT 6'CURB & I PAD I I ;-� _2IN' 2%� 2% 6 CURB & 6 CURB &
IC', — r_rti y GUTTER ?� - NTC GUTTERUTTER-1:1 MAX. - 2%L1.0' SLOPE -E ELEV __2_ PAVEMENT 22% _ 2% �CONC.

CONC. ROUGH GRADE LINE SIDEWALK L 1.0' SECTION " H - H " SIDEWALK - ROUGH GRADE LINE SIDEWALK

NO SCALE
SECTION B - B " „
NO SCALE SECTION E- E

NO SCALE
P/L 13UKY.
20' 5' 10' 10' 4' 10' 10' 13.5'± PL 2'

10.4' 5.5'
PAD I I EXIST HOUSE
2' .
2% 1% MIN.

NO/LH SOUTH -1 2-%- TC4 --- --- P/L I 1 i__

1. 42' PAD �1.0' 11 I 1 1 I I. �7 - ROUGH GRADE LINE 5' 16' CL 16' 5' 5' I I I '_ 'ff » — >> — 1_ III111 _ 4.5' MAX. SECTION I 1 I -111111 RETAINING

NO SCALE
6'CURB & -I
PAD 1:1 MAX.-� GUTTER AC PAVEMENT I PAD 1111 Z % 2% rIll OTC+ '- / 2% 1:1 MAX. 1 11 2% � AC�� ��° �� TRACT I— � 1% BDRY. 0

1.0 /, ___
' 6"CURB & CONC. SLOPE 11 11 6 EXISTING GOLF COURSE TRACT NO. 20475 0 CONC. ROUGH GRADE LINE GUTTER SIDEWALK Eli I II -III . - p TRACT SIDEWALK 7AC�� N�° �3� BDRY.

Ct
-\vI—
S E C TI 0 N " C— C" I XISTING GOLF COURSE TRACT NO. 20475 N NO SCALE SECTION �C-F� I 15' WIDE TEMPORARY O r CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT I 0 SCALE 1"=10' HORIZ. - 4' TUBULAR STEEL SCALE 1"=5' VERT. 4' TUBULAR STEEL ,-EXISTING GRADE EXISTING TREE I FENCE ON RETAINING CC - FENCE ON RETAINING f SPLIT FACE BLOCKS SPLIT FACE BLOCKS - - -�I _
_ 5:1
MAX 4'
x
1'CURB W/ 4'GUTTER I - VASES - r-PAD (—
CATCH BASIN WITH 0.5, III _ _ _ = 0

0.5 .

GALVANIZED GRATE - ••••• •`, •-•-,.•.• - - — Ell : - - - 1T111111i1111�1111,�,111 Z ,Y PROP. 1' CURB
o
I +I PAD W/ 4' _GUTTER 1 1 1 1-1, • ID -toCV
-111= `
-111
111111 • I 11 ��1I11� c� . ,-1 I I p
f z
y > S K"• 2,1_ 0 SECTION "K- Underground Service Alert • . N �I MI CALL
L • r •I I I• —I I I i �y �' - 111-11 r' SCALE: 1"=10' � 1111 ;111-111111— — N
0 �� TOLL FREE N ���� 1' 81 1 SECTION "L-L" z

NOT TO SCALE
TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG WDID: 8 36C395058 Q CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO. 9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT co ��e0-E A, CITY OF UPLAND TM20245 N DESCRIPTION: MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP VDIN ��,-0- q •�I, DESIGNED BY: N 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN MA DO L E gt= ,, 2CD 9302 PITTCUCAM AVE.,SUITE 230 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU TRACT Fl O 20245 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 u..1.3 No. 36637 c DATE CATCH BASIN, 64' N/O C/L 15th STREET AND _ & ASSOCIATES, INC. PHONE 909A81.6322 06-30-22 CHECKED BY:Ce RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 o 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS AVENUE. Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 ExpiQ WLI RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 10 SHEETS 1_ T„ CIVIC- ��� ROUGH GRADING PLAN F47FCA1.3. RECOMMENDED BY: DRAWING NO. w DATE: 1986 SECTIONS AND DETAILS a ELEV: 1425.286' WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION GP 21-08 cL

APN
1045-621-55
PAD =
\ \
\ \
\ \
h �� 00
/30 \ \ \ COORDINATE WITH SEWER PLANS& / I . �� 000� 1 P / 034) 0 �� 1) °��`'� `�°� \ 0 CoUR-' ABANDON EXIST.SEWER&REMOVE J o 03 `2'" ( �-� \ oo (1 ) AP 10 .-1 i 1-03 MANHOLESr ti t\o o (1436) N �� N \ \ \ \ Pao h� ' : �' IGH LINE •0Olt: ��' \`r;;' o`��• �' o� PROP. 15'CON RUCTON ,- DAYLIGHT LINE oti,\ �o� 0�(ow1`4• o w\ c 47.00' '> ♦ 47.00' 47.00' !! �� 47.00' ' , 1�� �/� • 47.00' 4 4 .11 �� � r�• i tom\> '� J • d- `� � ! i y r�'/� N B I �� ■1,� �� go ,\,,,�� ����. I/���..-. a i-�>it.. 0.

O� . .
_ _ , (1425) 1425 �) PROTECT IN-PLACE �` 4�� � � � _ _ _ 4 e . . I��-i���rul3jj.1 - - 1► 7
.� .fir �. _ ,
EXIST.WALL&FENCE _ . . • 4�► �s.r��.` •gin-�_,a ^r+ �G - \ IM11111 �,r7 Mii �:� �R7%■ - -_= i��.�' / ; ■ r'%� -.m_ -_A j -� 1-� AP i� �, „, tiw° o�C'== li� . - >� C  -- ___ ;.;fc �, : _- �'• G `1. -G-- `b' C, `l. o� `1...� `l: `l. C, `b G 1045-62 -37 ''� ,e�• II � ,,,,v� �� 13 " " 14 0 16 p 17 �ti �� / 0.51 ��O ST E ET A �� 3.50io _ I I ° IiiIII.,.• o�iii, ram' ; P1=28.00 ,- - p F2 1 W 28 . 2Z71� ;BC r,,, �,,Lo�`� �1 �� �i . �� .Dc�� .ec��AM 0 III i� 4.bt,,, , ���ti --ITAINIENIIIMM_-- �17�-� ►uqlV ` - � �� + _ 7 W 7 t 1 1� �� W 7I■�lI1I/ MMa ibiliAMEINNAM - .♦l7 ..-_ _ I■� - _ ■�!_ �� -- - �w,�-��.���e�u�rir��i �����_�r����..�,���ii►-� �.�_km ���r _ �_ ��•�i/� ��- ��r� w ��• M�wW _ �1 ° c, / •-'� 1 ° ' a��d.ut ,,w. '%��1Crim�� �1.'.pi� a11��LO�aI„JIa ....��r�tZii_7!__ A����\ Ill�d �s r���I►���rl�ai� �'wA■��v- . �se i_1_�\�►I_��1� r�� ° m� � � �. mow,--- ��. w I
�' S 1i7. n \ »fir sib ■ _ �l4siT,. Aii► w ■ • .1 ■1 ■ TiE: - Tr� � 't.�a ■ .. :� 1fr.:.
/� .:.rc,. w•. � � �� i►.Iii�=ate .wii �� 4 w�i. �pr��b�.�v �`� ai .�_.��� ui �ni � - - �f�iii�t�'e�_� i�: �_w�.. =..i ��� � iii ' �.0 ` wiii-1-4 ' do `�r . ���n i1����� W,I_ •...•.•_I_,•._..

APN 1 = iV, 4 z 9 1045-621-38z �c :: yr ,
1420- -(1420) mill 11111.... ��(1420) ril
l! -A
i Ili
9 / / 1425 (14 ����� '�. - o � i - �■ 1�y /_�► o`(14?5) � I 0 S iL E ...I-� a ..�f--:�,1i _ _.�Il' ri �'�"1111 " . - �-� o hir.t'.� - � ft _ • �' .. . . - _.r4�:� - �► -� ��ci, I.. , _ �1 a .. �.�� \ ��- �lr�`�S'���'��- � ii��Fl� I I�� d•� � ��t+�. �r;i�� � ►�r� `�'��� - �.��►i r �ofN �'• i;�,/ •�PROTECT IN PLACE 'co I ` / / � - .�rr11 ������� PP---iw ,„,�� - � (1430) 0 ti ��(1430)EXIST.WALL&FENCE - v 11• ' OF EXIST!StWER& ' ' -' i'ES. I- Ir1~I l cal(, 1►MI► Illfda �' I /�3^, W 11111111 W " A APN ,l�itFFl�l�l►�f�i��� � /` x I 1- 2 ' ' ` .1 5 4 64 4 63 �, �� 62 �� kr _ '` 5654 W 5 5 1045-621- f I I ko .07' �o o ti�0 47.00' �o o ti�0 47.00'w 1��0 47.00'0 �o 25.uj l� • • �> �� cn �> oa h % �, o ,�4o ti` 3 Cr) ,ass doh II
a � � � .- �-ar� ..._ � �� 47 i.. c __�_,, � ! i i �___ Pliiiral°11111.1.1141111b . �' 47.i i c � 47.00 �� � 47.00 � � 47.00 �� 4 4 .00 �n � � � V � �07' ,� �=- fin,% "�.1:.� � •- !��i � _ -REFER TO STORM DRAIN PLANS I[ `I��, `'�+ w - - - -- = ' - - - - - - - - ��-N 1-111114i1W3°7: 411111111r:-AP- _ v _ �I ��► � i tS66 0II'FOR REMOVAL OF EXIST. STORM - ��•�`��' �. J \ - ---- -�>v I I v �� �� Y _� � _DRAIN PIPES&STRUCTURES. ��, �0Mk�r,�1;� 1��� 1 -! i��� 1425 �_ - n gym, .- 1111-1
) .../.°P-- -.14447-1411MWEIMI - _ ---.. - ___- ___ • .-- - ....---..... _... ,, ...--.,- . • 4anoi..... ° ° a - 3m...... ..Rwm.....
. _...._
���� ���.I � � 't76 Ott► �� lialkeirommandowsitt Sith�� ��� �. ��+� � . ������jp.��fr+oy -y ������ ��yr��������� ,_... -...... v �r��._-N__ ��yW-.......... .. �- _�� ����_ �����~ 'off '�,- `''_ - k%� .a�.�'i` `` `` I - ��r�:...�_ -- - .� -� I� IIIIII W `_I W -- W -. V� I W.� Z 4 ____Awilvw, - _,,,_--qq.yourA___10.---- Awl - ----e , -g 71- ..
, ,
op 1 . o
O
Th ________„,--) / --- -'---- _ \ I-
V)
N - Z V• 1 ■ g i 33 - I I 0 CONSTRUCTION NOTES _ .
ti \ 6+ o
O I 1�CONSTRUCT MODIFIED CURB&GUTTER TYPE A(12 CURB 148 GUTTER)PER CITY STD.PLAN NO.CU-R-2. w r 1$' 18' 18' _ 15'
0-1
ERI'lIAND AVENUE 666O II , II Z IT co
1 N
SCALE: 1 "= 30' CL
0 30 60 90 120
z

71.76,
Underground Service Alert Q 0_
CALL
CD
(-NI� TOLL FREE N IA 0 1-
TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG WDID: 8 36C395058 Q o'
CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO. 9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT co Q��L. 1 s CITY OF UPLAND TM202451 DESCRIPTION: MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP VID IN ��,��,\%' q/ 2 DESIGNED BY: N 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN MA DO L E2� c' . `n THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC 9302 PIO CUC GH AVE.,SUITE 230 3 No, 36637 c DATE 3 QQ�� RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU TRACT NO. 20245 CATCH BASIN, 64' N/O C/L 15th STREET AND (X ASSOCIATES, INC. PHONE 909.481.6322 RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 O Exp: 06-30-22 * CHECKED BY: z 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS AVENUE. Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 �, Q WLI RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 10 SHEETS 1_ ;• �I�I,, ��� ROUGH GRADING PLAN DATE: 1986 FOFCALIF' RECOMMENDED BY:

DRAWING NO. Li
ELEV: 1425.286' ' WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION GP 21-08 0' 0_

43Y'(/) i R I r bn$N �`=-� Yi� tY �� i`�C��► 11 / , � � �� k:•°� .i Til(Il�i►I+��• .1 , �U- W/4 G U ice. - =.:c,.11►_•o�ff vow r� sp, 1, ,7,. . 47.00' ter;`�•�el% �1 i � � °c'="Ol�a�.i�� 4 .00' ' �> �``� - 7 00 . ��, . ���11� � � _--�• / ��,,�;•, 1 • , ,\ l 4 k.2• 47.00' .a.� 4- i. 24.00' 2) ' .e TI►..9 _ -imini �� �� (1425) (1425) .■�.� ����`l�y_�1 1425 IIIIIIIW ��me- '/I I �. l t. %11111004ipinsoomum...... am_ ( ) rf�co,- .4^ i "Lile
6 11 - sowinim
co (1410) ��••:-kao , ,ip- (1420) ���� `fir o• Illbo�` o r�i�� � '\ a ��Lemint. pirlomegl
�,a ��� ' _ . INTILI ,C) Iirlkfr .I.mLI ^�!L- ��' -y�y����� `e`P� �� (TYP. �'. j4 w �^�, EASE � soh(1415) lk
o _ ti `�� milligi
��,���i � �
GOLF COURSE o '� _ - �' 1' 1,�i� 1 C G�"4,"
- /� ,ry• ■>I1■ ^9L' L ' 7�0 �- `�- , I�11- V .:'1 - `�" �11- `� - 11 ■ Ap - .�11 _,ar- .10- .m ';:� a' - 4/ 2 ° `■`= \ - - - APN 1045-121-13 l/ I
�0� �P ° - •�-.1° �S�s' 18Wr� Ee�s�� a��� �1 - - 1 ° �j� `� 1► / ".A ►I J _ /` `N.rs �.�'� '' i''''✓p1 �,'�. •�R�, �,:•�.111 � : � '.ice � 4,i A, r��- �.ge 1s�'I
Al ...off .>��;°� ��` a�lIII STREET B �- 14 o5o°i° 15 16 -� zrrc ;�il 1 ►
p� h / iir? ��431 . � o ° ° AIMi�� F / / F� ��' ' ���l� - .AP= 'meiV ■- -47 I :n' g■ V QB' - -47-aft °.■� ■ !LTOW . . ii tIl ,� �j� wW�-_' I c., 0 � 4 ,
�� A
� k I'`' F�' (cG �-UTILITY v//28.8 34 _ T 40,
prAwabi
i....,..i.4......zim.. ....iogiirisi......,......._...,,q..II.,..,y' A . I. - li_ _ 0.,,411 V). e-\, 1, -, j. VOir °\° lk c4) 4' '4kiel. -s
.1........_law
I e1 �/ G ti, el `�I�®� � /N.� ��! I� 1�o �.1 .�•��i/ �� a�t�" _ .,,-.-11.1-0-001-4.1. � 1420' � iwom 'd ,,_ ,___ �=����i �� sz��►�"iNI�l 39�- I is �..._ � .. meinv .. 1���0� ,lliraid J, 1 °!A r ; TC ` � ,D� N �� ' �.jiIt _ � ''[) �y �►�`11�� ✓ `� I�IIFi� 'n • �:u • _�r• � ,v �'L�\�-� co // S/'4 /1�� I do �23/ 1 - - -�� ' �mommilm- •� �I1� 91� r��-- - 1►i� ' .� . I ..,a �,�r •4 1''=1rii: �wl ram■' �,��� Iai � . �---. �, 44 �.�, .11 ,�� I� ■■ 142 �.■ III I� (1425) , ��� i /i�.,.� • �. �� ' Al,,,16'-
�. /I=1/lid 'IIII� ����h1425 .a��..w�.� -��.� ji' /. 2 •�� I ,r �Rlr ---J- vSr.I: �TI'_=•11 { i ����',�►� �- 1425)�� �-- ������5 4.4 �L® !� dQ- N�5 � a 4e f �irl% ��I �► �__ ��i� w W ( ♦ F �4 d 1r4L -I+�j����• % . ��a ' i► 11rj7■tt - �����/�. w _ _ O �10 �� \ � ` / -� aG �:'•d ,p si_.�.�ea■.■ (14301 \�-� p, �. ��7tmill1II1130% ( ) . ::-si. __:��V-'•�` /'� '•:`` s� / Q�; 5°\�� de4f-' 0� .L! 4 ' '`�\�7 - 11 _;�'. ,'' .' J 4' \ 1'- Z`�7c'-- =mil-';= ,a.�-=.,��r+ �i�.Ff Air
V J �� ( ) j ° ' `�C�� •`a // Ili ,gyp, C �.=a •-:. -10 11 .. � • �� 1420 � �� ,i ti• F� /�i�r' / •6' � n�l� �� � �� ��! 28.5 ;� _ _ � .--` �` •� III �/I�i®' - �� '� - \� - - � � o_ � �, , 1 0 ��91 �� tiQAa1 // �01'O�r - - - - Y T - - - - - I� �C9? CONSTRUCT ��- FL ffirI ��c. ` I C1 _-- I �.r�' �/N89°45 00 W 71.53 �LU 1 �,I FS • 1 �� _ •�• CONCRET � �:� ,J_ 'ram VZ N J \ 1IghilliiPill ��;ILit➢II 5IV'
taliIIr Ar r -Nil / ��� .- - _� _ ��I!':Y - Ic =- ���� - ram _ --> J UTILITY w 'AD LIN� /1 ,i Ir - _ ;,� � �� y_� � °ASEMENT �, ( ) I All II 1� �i�•9� i • T e`'j TYP ,/� olio- r1���4 erarm•zw'ivAal- -iwnwmk it f Ii��i/////��i1., _ '_� �� �_ 11 > ��_ -`� .,7 1 io- _ S` ° SOOT - L-fl - gib �Illf/�"��. 111 �� 1.0% � +� A�Ji ����������ii :t1�.et '`_ �' �.► .rA J��r4.cgam���� fo ill- i t 'JVr y (� ° .i �. � ?� ar �;. 143 /11/ T=,• '��-Jo•�•�•�•�• ' ' - \° �� 4r. �_ f��l =tA �i �rA% ..�Irr �` LLaI ��° a.a3/°.��/�f �/ - - -. - - - `�_ - - - - - �. - - - - / 2.0/° �:-�:..1�:.��.��. o

1. CMG,EMIL
"tij�,A r - n r• !' 2°/ F �E'2. Jr �'► : 9'43"W 420.00' �71�Ctiti S�•��n. _ 7� l_ ��-I-R'�i�'OM-- III-I-I••■�1�`6/A\ .``Y.N1Hf�tiI Jl..����, 1111 �/ C NSTR CT �� •
n 1 �ti� R," / rs�Er' ��i�aJ ' tiro,:`\,N I (J _I •Tdi! 5- Q 18 S EET A �' S / : ��I�'' I�I;,_:,�.� 1 �IE��'%��"IA -�l/G / /r IBM,iff`'L71L`7� �i�j��P1�i"°„�'�1-`J■ � `L �.u. - �ti :i��1�1I7T P" ►� I�!/ ao° Q I - 1i� C; �� �` ■ �l ‘ ,NfJw41 \ 0425) -��1 .. . tio' .Q4 IF /Iro ai `v 5� 25.0o svc\ o �/(1425) �0 ,��, ��� yi 1 � '� F �o�oA ��� t � 2.89 TC 2$ o
!Fi1 iMpK_1 N7 _ J_�,�v.�1:011 lig %L►��i/IC/% c' 31 I- IX
. 15th STREE 92.51' �`v CONSTRUCTION NOTES -CD CONSTRUCTION # W a _ W W c....,_ W 1�CONSTRUCT MODIFIED CURB&GUTTER TYPE A(12"CURB/48"GUTTER)PER CITY STD.PLAN N0.CU-R-2. Z II 0
.____
__....._ _____ ------_______t---___---
0 7.0
rd<
_1
RAW � �� L:L3 ix Q O
I LL �) \ N. th A VEN
O01
ti 33 666 Z IT 0
I
14�g� N I. I SCALE: 1 "= 30' CD 0 30 60 90 120
z
MIMM1M z
Underground Service Alert Q 0_
CALL
N
� CD TOLL FREE N 0 { 811 0 OA z 1-
.TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG WDID: 8 36C395058 Q CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO. 9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT co Q�� ,A, C I TY OF UPLAND TM20245 DESCRIPTION: MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP'VDIfir ��,��,�%' q� 2 DESIGNED BY: N 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN MADOL E ' `rc\ . `n THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC � CUC GH AVE.,SUITE 730 3 No, 36637 c DATE 4 0 QQ RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU TRACT NO. 20245 CATCH BASIN, 64' N/O C/L 15th STREET AND .x ASSOCIATES, INC. PHONE 909.481.6322 RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 0 Expl 06-30-22 * CHECKED BY: z 35'W/0 C/L CAMPUS AVENUE. Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 tf, Q WLI RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 1 O SHEETS '•qT civ,� ��� ROUGH GRADING PLAN DRAWING NO. Lu
DATE: 1986 `OF-CALV' RECOMMENDED BY:

ELEV: 1425.286' WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION GP 21-08 0_

30' _ 20'
PL7' _ 60' _ 7'
240' PL CONCRETED 28.5L CONCRETED TRACT 9729 5' ROCK 28.35 32.0 32.0 x MIN. - 31' 20' 81'T _ 26' _ 73.85' _ 21 , Aa FL ROCK FS FS �` / ROCK RIPRAP 14151
1415
/) l I ' N / - Imo. �, .- � -� '� / �� 1 = (J J i �_ .� _ % /� �11Plk ,, 428.35 - - - - 14 i - �� • - 1420 �,TM1 V J r
W :: �(1420),� 1 FL f1r! - _. - I I 28L5 ^ _ 11111ai I!!!!III _` 1425 CONSTRUCT CON i `-;111;��!!!!u!UI 42 ROCH ' t ' W - 0425) �� I I 1 ! .moo, �_ r�Y_ LLI U) .; ! I . , I 1 I W yl�/��Z. N - i - �. l` I 1430 14 v J � '� (1430) ��r I \28.1 So 28 L 5 '�� � �- 3 /* - :.. /N. n, /� �Q sa-,-
FL �� IF 32.0 FG 1 o •.,. 28.5 9 ° FS o
��� '' ��� FL 32.2 a.1 N M I N89°45'00"W 71.57 CONSTRUCT � ��, Lro�°I�'�� ' CONCRETED � '\30.48 I. - - I.° - - - I
1 - - - - 7/ 7/ - -V V 7 - �� c ti1�� ROCK RIPRAP ��S 1 ku- O E> I 1 I
�--�� x-- 669�I,�, � _��- CONSTRUCTCO �. w �1.1%° \28.28N �-- �30.68 I i .r i L 4 45 I FL 419.5E 418.5 �� � � � � 2.3%_ FS � o ,FS FL 1 - I FL- � I - - -- -(�- / �. 1 '• _J F� FL FL I `A��7 ,A , �1W�7 - \28.80 1.0% 1 1�9_ - - 1 1 -/ 1.0% � �4EG 1) "4EG 7) � I(4EG 4)
G.1 4EG'9 I(4EG.0) 4E�•�
C NSTR CT � \ �--� / Z (1425) �� -_�
/ O
�_ / E) I- / o (PF V
/ D
/ Hil
NCt
/ Z
cp
/ Q
/ U
Ct
--\-7 (\ 1 j'
CONCR-TED ROCK: / _
A. 500 LB. ANGULAR ROCK PE�I TABLE 02 0-1.6.2, SPPWC.
( 0 B. ROCK SI-ALL BE P D PER SECTION 300-11, SPPWC, WITH O f 0 �S 1/3 OF ROCK DIAMETER PROJECTING ABOVE THE CONCRETE Li-
SURFACE i-
affZ
Z
74' o0 n o

32.0 32.0 I FG I/ VARIES FG `�' -III-III-I Vq - - S III-III= 1E111E1 I I /WES V6 1=111=111=1 ICD
'I I-TiE111=_ 1 -ITI-111111- o -111-111-111-i 11 CONCRETED r-ROUGH GRADE LINE - 1=111p 11- _ _ _ z �111-111E111= ---• ROCK 1 ,------ E.111-'' 111E111E111111 -� �•o, =111=1I Underground Service Alert ''-ITI-ITI-ITI-ITI= --- '� /,-III1'" 11111 111E111111111-_ �' 1-I I I I ,I 1 111' CALL I 1111 1111„I 11„111-111-111-1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-111E111E111E111E1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-111E111E111E1 1 1-1 1 1-1 1 1-1111 T 11 i 1- �� TOLL FREE -111--III-III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=IIIIIIIII=1" ((( -111.ITI111ITIITI=ITI=ITIITIITI=1TI-1T1-1TI-111III111, 11, 11; cp 811
1' ff ff N SECTION 5
z
SCALE: 1"=10' 1- TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG J WDID: 8 36C395058 Q CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO. 9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: ��e��� ��� DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT °O CITY OF UPLAND TM20245 N
DESCRIPTION: MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP VD fir ��`,0y q��I, DESIGNED BY: cv 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN MA DO L E ?� ' 9302 PITTCUCAM NGA SUITE 230 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU 5 co
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC Qg� RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 u..1.3 No, 36637 c� DATE TRACT NO. 20245 CATCH BASIN, 64' N/O C/L 15th STREET AND _ & ASSOCIATES, INC. PHONE:909.481.6322 Ex pi 06-30-22 CHECKED BY: RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 o 35'W/0 C/L CAMPUS AVENUE. Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 P * WLI RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 10 SHEETS 1_ tp
T-i CIVIA- ��� ROUGH GRADING PLAN C3
DATE: 1986 FOFCAllC' RECOMMENDED BY: DRAWING NO. Li ELEV: 1425.286' WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION GP 21-08 cL

35'
20' 35.7' 8' 20' 7' WIDE
SEWER 32.3 32.0 EASEMENT EXIST. HABITAT AREA FS FS EXIST. 29.0 28.8

18.0 18.0 GROUND 18.0 (PROTECT IN PLACE) FL FL FG FG _ _ FG _ EXIST. GROUND _ _ _ _ GRADE BREAK 100 YR W.S.=27.0 — —I 1 1=1 1 1=1 1 1=1 1 —I 1-1 1 1=1 1 1=1 5;/ Ico -111E111E111E111E111-111E 1 111E111E111E111= 5.1 - 1=1I1= PL EXIST. CHAIN \ Q BOTTOM GRADE TO EXISTING 2
1 _ -III=III=111-III-III-III-III-I 11=l -t!I-I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I- -I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11= GROVE AVENUE , LINK FENCE ROUGH GRADE LINE 3 20.0 -111E111E111E111E111E111EI I I-III-III-111-1 111E111E111E111E111E111EI I I-III-III-11 III-III-111-111-111-111-1 BOTTOM_05.0 __=III III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III=1111 111 -III,—,III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-II , ��� I - 111:11=III- "' "' "' "' "' "'_ g TOP OF ROCK f(09.60)
1-111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111111, 11 111E111E111E111E111-111E111-111=11 111 111 111 111 I I I I I I 111 -111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111111 ,111=1 i- INV. "' —11 111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E1 11- t ', .1 •'. -III=III=III=1111 I11- III III 11I—III—III-11'— EXIST. 8 DUCTILE 1111E111E111E111E111E111E11111111I- P� ztataRa • EXIST. GROUND �, 14 -III-III,;,III- IRON SEWER MAIN » » —III1�III=III—III=111� 111E A j 11- SECTION 6C 1-111EI T I .III- 3 (PROTECT IN PLACE) '1-1 11—
DP 1 CO ROCK ED SECTION " 6 B "
SCALE: 1 =20 5.5'
\ I I
FS --END WALL (SEE SECTION 6F) SCALE: 1"=10'

32.0 6' _ 40' 6' - i x (------
1 j 32.0 EXIST. GROUND FS o / 1 -�111-III_ ."7 •N -Ill'
71Il III= SPILLWAY CREST EL.=29.0 — 1=111—III,:

II-111-1k ��— P III-III-III 1II-III III=IIIEIII- '11=11111 t1 I In II111=111E111=11 111III= tI I In 1 in 1 in 1 II 1 in HE' 1' rC7 ____----- ' 1=1 111 T I_ III-III-III-I 11=1 I E I 11="1=1' IIIIIII 111 T 11 T 1=1 T 11 i'- -"' m ROUGH GRADE LINE \ SECTION " 6A"
0 SCALE: 1"=10' PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST.SEWER LINE. _ - POTHOLE AND VERIFY LOCATION&ELEVATION c
DAYLIGHT BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES IN THIS (1430) ) I (1430) 419.0 TW AREA /

DAYLIGHT
END WAL 419.5 TW I
FL CONCRETED EXIST. SIDE WALL - `o %-) ROCK _1 GROUND TOP SIDE WALL — (1425) I (1425) y
1 i -2 S PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST.WATER LINE.

COMPACTED 1 _ • (1420) (1420) ��� �I
- /-. � _ � POTHOLE AND VERIFY LOCATION &ELEVATION

BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES IN THIS
HORIZ. AND VERT. / el I , C REINFORCEMENT 12' COMPACTED �'� „� CONCRETED ROCK AREA #4 @ 18" OC SUBGRADE HORIZ. AND VERT. 12 --COMPACT SUBGRADE PLACED IN THE REINFORCEMENT / #4 @ 18" OC / sEW \L MIDDLE. SECTION " 6D " FPS ER PLACED IN THE FMENT
SCALE: 1"-5' MIDDLE. END WALL - / �\ 6C EXIST. HABITAT AREA s d
SECTION " 6F" 6
(TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED
SCALE: 1"=5' w , i
/
� PROTECT IN PLACE)
12" (COMPACTED @ 90% w ` DAYLIGHT (NO WORK, NO ACCESS/ INGRESS, NO STORAGE) I CONCRETED ROCK 'ci) 1410E ^
WI v J
1415
%AI
CONCRETED ROCK: _ p
Ili (1420) A. 500 LB. ANGULAR ROCK PER TABLE 200 1.6.2, SPPWC. W (1420) t 1420— HORIZ. AND VERT. B. ROCK SHALL BE PLACED PER SECTION 300-11, SPPWC, WITH UJ , �^ vN TRUC CON —�
REINFORCEMENT 1/3 OF ROCK DIAMETER PROJECTING ABOVE THE CONCRETE V J -HOCK RIPRAP COMPACTED #4 © 18" OC SURFACE ,,' SUBGRADE @ `' (NI1425 �� (1425) 90% PLACED IN THE 432.0 SIDE WA LLMIDDLE. __ _ _ �� FS N/- 428.8FS - 4FS 8 41'* - - 1430 _ DAYLIGHT / (1, ) SECTION 6E - FS \ -- SCALE: 1"=5' 432.3 432.3 (
FS \ 129.0E - -42970 / FS - - - - — — — — FS FS Vic,,o)

CONSTRUCT CONCRETED
PL ROCK RIPRAP �; ',25 - I (1430) EXIST. GROUND 5 418.5 0 o I (1425) EXIST. CHAIN
TRACT 9729 to% FL 1420 LINK FENCE 1 _ _ / —�, z 2' VARIES 2' M — W - Z (420X ,1 O IN Jo 1% EG
N I EXIST.C&G _ 42 1 / 1 I 0 •
EXIST. POWERP Ca D Id CO (PROTECIn
/ Ct
2:1 MAX 1— SECTION " 6G" 11 0 SCALE: 1"=10'
"' 0
w IIx
__-- LLI
8 __--- LL1
PL 240' PL
H
O
TRACT 9729 GRADE TO EXISTING Z Z I2( -r(1111E�'II1='111=''II1t _ GRADE TO EXISTING =� — r ^ I I I-111E111E111E111-111—III [EXIST. - 1 I I-I 11'I=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 111 111 11= ,�rrl=1 I IEI I IEI 11= N I—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—III—I 11=1 111 11= 3. GROUND 1E111E111E1 1E111E111 -mil�II 11=1 I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 111 111 11=1 111 11III—Ill— EI 111 I IEI I IEI I ITI I IEI 11- TIT, 11=111 I AI 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 I A I ILI 11=11 1=11 1111- - — - - =1 T 1=IIIE111E111E111E111E T I `p ''-111111111111111I I II I II I I111E111E11 IEI 1 IE111E111E111E111-111=_ • - =1 T IE T E111-111E111E111E111;111- o - 1 111 IEI 1 IEI 1 IEI 11=11 1=111=1 T 1=11 1-111- 1 1 �I I II I IEI I IEI I IEI I IEI 11=1 T 1111-H 1-1' z - 11E111=111111111E"'=I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=111E 1 BOTTOM=10.0 =111� -III-III-III-I I 1-1 i' ' III-III-I 11- " ' 1=1 I I-III-III-I 11=111E111E111E111E111E111-111-1 i 1-1 i 1 1=1 T 1=1 T 1=1 T 1=1 11=1' Underground Service Alert '' - '' ''-IIIIIIIII1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 11=1 11=1 I I—III—I 11= ROUGH GRADE LINE=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I-' '11-11 I-11 I-I i I-I I-m-1 m 1-1 i 1 1 m 1-1 1 �'=1 11=1 11=1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 I I-1 11=1 111 11=1'' o „ „ ''11 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I, I i- �, SECTION 6H ITI-ITI-ITI-I'I=E11
N
4 '1A TOLL FREE SCALE: 1"=20' oN ���� 1' 81 1
o
z
F-
TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG WDID: 8 36C395058 Q CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO. 9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT °O <2t3FI ‹.• CITY OF UPLAND TM20245 N DESCRIPTION: MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP VD IN ���,�y '%,� DESIGNED BY: N 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN MADOL E �� A • THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC RANCHO CUCAMONGA,SUITE 730 3 No. 36637 c i PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU DATE 6 CA. .6320 TRACT NI 0 20245 CATCH BASIN, 64' N/O C/L 15th STREET AND _ & ASSOCIATES, INC. PHONE 909.481.6322 Expi 06-30-22 * CHECKED BY: RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12 31 22 o 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS AVENUE. Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 �, Q WLI RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 10 SHEETS 1_ .• CIVIC- ��� ROUGH GRADING PLAN DATE: 1986 FOFCAllC' RECOMMENDED BY: DRAWING NO.

ELEV: 1425.286' WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION GP 21-08 cL

GENERAL NOTES FOR EROSION CONTROL PLANS SWPPP NOTES:

THE QSP/CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE BMPS. THE I 11

1. IN THE CASE OF EMERGENCY, CALL DAVE HAUGEN AT WORK PHONE NUMBER (909)730-1979. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BMPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF ANY Li 2. EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMESPOLLUTANTS. ALL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE RECORDED AS AMENDMENTS AND/OR LISTED AS MAINTENANCE IN THEC IT O F P LA D DURING THE RAINY SEASON. NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON-SITE AND SWPPP AND SHOWN ON THIS PLAN.

STOCKPILED AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF E R OS I O CXDL T1 R®L PLAN JTEMPPORR ARY DEVICES WHEN RAINNIS IS IMMIMI NEE NT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE CONDITIONS. � Q , P,q

3. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL NOT BE MOVED OR MODIFIED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF � �D CT) yl Q
SLOPES AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY. DRAINAGE IS TO BE DIRECTED TOWARD ^ B - STREET - T o DESILTING FACILITIES. SHALL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE SOIL COVER FOR INACTIVE AREAS AND ALL FINISHED SLOPES, OPEN SPACES, UTILITY I\ TRACT BOUNDARY —- - _�= - - _ ; cv c� 1TI
BACKFILL, AND COMPLETED LOTS. ��L- / �� i_ it

7. THE PERMITTEE AND CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND SHALL TAKE NECESSARY I - �) II IP z
PRECAUTIONS TO PREVENT PUBLIC TRESPASS ONTO AREAS WHERE IMPOUNDED WATER I / :- , THE CONTRACTOR/QSP SHALL IMPLEMENT GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MANAGEMENT AND PROCEDURES FOR ALL TRACT NO. 20245 CREATES A HAZARDOUS CONDITION. - ' -I- ' T -'- - J _-/ _ _ = `� •" CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, STORAGE AREAS, WASTE MANAGEMENT AND AREAS, VEHICLE STORAGE AND - - - - - -� - - - - - .7- MAINTENANCE Lu r - A STREET 1

8. THE PERMITTEE AND CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EROSION CONTROL WORK AND INSURE MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT AND AREAS, LANDSCAPE MATERIALS, ETC. a z 1 ,. = =_ ._y - j - - T - r r 1TACT BOUNDARY i VICINITY MAP
THAT THE WORK IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS. w S E T 9 1 THE CONTRACTOR/QSP SHALL IMPLEMENT GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MANAGEMENT AND PROCEDURES FOR THE v a I 1

9. ANY SLOPES WITH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED VEGETATION MUST BE STABILIZED TO CONTROL OF ALL AIR DEPOSITION OF SITE MATERIALS AND FROM SITE OPERATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 1 — — — _ 1 1 �11 . _ NTS INHIBIT EROSION BY WIND AND WATER. SEDIMENTS, NUTRIENTS, TRASH, METALS, BACTERIA, OIL AND GREASE, AND ORGANICS. /.1 ..7 - — — — r=i----=---
— I
r — ;, fr

10. SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLEENGINEER'S NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS I_ _ _ _ r 1
PRIVATE CL 15 th STREET -r - +Ir ZTRAFFIC. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ROADWAYS MUST BE STABILIZED TO INHIBIT 1 IIwr
SEDIMENTS FROM BEING DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY.ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITIONS MUST THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE I I ] I:1 BE SWEPT UP IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS. OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF AVAILABLE RECORDS; TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, THERE ARE NO EXISTING I 1 I P.. I V w UTILITIES EXCEPT THOSE SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO TAKE DUE FERNANDO 13th ALTA MONTE VERDE

11. CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE CONTRACTOR AVENUE INDEX MAP PRACTICES (BMP) IN SUCH A MANNER THAT POLLUTANTS ARE NOT DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE AVENUE AVENUE AVENUE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. FURTHER ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS OR STRUCTURES SCALE: 1"=200' SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS.

12. ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE AND MAY NOT BE TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE VIA SHEETFLOW, SWALES,AREA DRAINS, NATURAL DRAINAGE THE CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE JOB SITE LEGEND:

OR WIND. CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT; INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS r PROPOSED GRAVELBAGS AND PROPERTY; THAT THIS SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND GRAVELBAGS FABRIC (POLY GRAVEL BAGS)

13. STOCKPILES OF EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD THE OWNER AND THE ENGINEER HARMLESS FROM 2"X2"WOOD STAKE FROM BEING TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE BY THE FORCES OF WIND AND WATER.

ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS Alliar `PROJECT, EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. v� �o o COARSE AGGREGATE

14. FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DROP INLET Ik COI THEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TO CONTAMINATE THE SOIL AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL `I' `I' APPROVED STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER. SPILLS MUST CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS AND SHALL REPORT ALL DISCREPANCIES TO THE ;;7 4 INLET 3 INLET PROTECTION
BE CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO `t' `�' WASHED INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. BEGINNING OF WORK MEANS ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIONS. �, \, I 1 i *43a/OL#15. EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OR ANY CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL N.P.D.E.S. REQUIREMENTS. \' _ \' \' \' X INDICATES 6 FT. HIGH OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTES ON `w) CHAIN LINK FENCE.

SITE UNTIL THEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE. CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST TO FINISH GRADE ALL MANHOLE RIMS, WATER VALVE BOXES, UTILITY BOXES AND I \' PROPOSED FIBER ROLL

16.ALL NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES, UNLESS EXCEPTED OR AUTHORIZED BY AN NPDES LIDS, ETC. FILTER FABRIC PERMIT, REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. DROP INLET 8" MIN. 0 FIBER ROLL I TT TT

TEMPORARY BMP
CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL THE NECESSARY PIPE FITTINGS TO COMPLETE THE WORK. 1 1 TO BE INSTALLED A _ _ BONDED FIBER MATRIX

17.TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED SOLID WASTES MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED Iv MIN. OF 4" INTO THE m •♦•• — STORMB WATER SAMPLE RECEPTACLE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WIND. THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE OR LIABLE FOR UNAUTHORIZED B PROTECTION DETAIL - \ :♦=�i to S1 LOCATION CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANGES TO THESE PLANS MUST BE REQUESTED IN WRITING AND GROUND SWPPP NOTES: MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. 1_ 6" I (Dl) ROE# LOCATION OF POSSIBLE RUN-ON
\v 2"x 2' WOODEN A. THE QSP/CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF QUANTITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE PROVIDED FOR PERMIT AND BONDING PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL Iv $TAKE SITE DISCHARGE LOCATION THE BMPS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE NECESSARY ADJUSTMENTS TO THE BMPS TO PREVENT (TYP) @4' MAX.

SILT FENCE (SE-I)
THE DISCHARGE OF ANY POLLUTANTS. ALL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE RECORDED AS AMENDMENTS BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THEIR OWN QUANTITIES PRIOR TO BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. THE SPACING O.C. NV NON-VISIBLE POLLUTANT-SAMPLE LOCATION AND/OR LISTED AS MAINTENANCE IN THE SWPPP AND SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. ENGINEER IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DISCREPANCIES IN FINAL CONSTRUCTION QUANTITIES.

TYP. FIBER ROLL INSTALLATION (SE-5) N.T.S. PL PROPERTY LINE B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE CONDITIONS. R/W RIGHT OF WAY J THE S.W.P.P.P.

C. THE STORM WATER QSP SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION AND COMPLIANCE OF STORM WATER POLLUTION INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE N.T.S. PROP. PROPOSED Z D. THIS EROSION CONTROL&BMP PLAN SHALL BE MADE PART OF THE SWPPP. BOTH THE SWPPP TYP. TYPICAL 0 AND THIS PLAN SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE ONSITE AT ALL TIMES. (DISCHARGERS SHALL ENSURE THAT ALL INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE REPAIR AND SAMPLING ACTIVITIES AT THE SBCFCD SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PROJECT LOCATION SHALL BE PERFORMED OR SUPERVISED BY A QUALIFIED SWPPP PRACTITIONER (QSP) FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT E. THE PARTOFCALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD GENERAL PERMIT SHALL BE MADE REPRESENTING THE DISCHARGER. THE QSP MAY DELEGATE ANY OR ALL OF THESE ACTIVITIES TO AN EMPLOYEE U A OF THE S.W.P.P.P. w F. THE CONTRACTOR/QSP SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT EFFECTIVE WIND EROSION APPROPRIATELY TRAINED TO DO THE TASK(S).) 0 80 _ CONTROL. DISCHARGERS SHALL PROVIDE EFFECTIVE SOIL COVER FOR INACTIVE AREAS AND ALL (-) FINISHED SLOPES, OPEN SPACES, UTILITY BACKFILL,AND COMPLETED LOTS. 1 THE REAP SHALL BE FILLED OUT AND FILED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO AN EXPECTED 50% CHANCE OF A G. THE CONTRACTOR/QSP SHALL IMPLEMENT GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MANAGEMENT AND RAIN EVENT. (A REAP IS NOT REQUIRED FOR RISK LEVEL 1 SITES). WOOD STAKE Q

PROCEDURES FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, STORAGE AREAS,WASTE MANAGEMENT AND AREAS,VEHICLE STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT AND AREAS, LANDSCAPE 2 DISCHARGERS SHALL INSPECT ON A DAILY BASIS ALL IMMEDIATE ACCESS ROADS . AT A MINIMUM (AS NECESSARY) PRIOR TO FABRIC a_ MATERIALS, ETC. ANY RAIN EVENT, THE DISCHARGER SHALL REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY-RELATED PROJECT BOUNDARY SLOPE PROTECTION AT TOE AND FACE OF SLOPE H. THE CONTRACTOR/QSP SHALL IMPLEMENT GOOD HOUSEKEEPING MANAGEMENT AND MATERIALS THAT ARE DEPOSITED ON THE ROADS (BY VACUUMING OR SWEEPING). o (TYP.) TABLE 1-CRITICAL SLOPE/SHEET FLOW LENGTH COMBINATIONS
PROCEDURES FOR THE CONTROL OF ALL AIR DEPOSITION OF SITE MATERIALS AND FROM SITE t 0 OPERATIONS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SEDIMENTS, NUTRIENTS, TRASH, METALS, BACTERIA, 3 A SITE INSPECTION OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION BMPS SHALL BE PERFORMED WEEKLY WITH ANY NECESSARY STAKES PLACED ON FAR SIDE OF SHEET FLOW LENGTH LJ-
OIL AND GREASE,AND ORGANICS. MAINTENANCE. THE BMPS SHALL BE INSPECTED BEFORE EACH 50% CHANCE OF A RAIN EVENT. i(ssZOb•y FABRIC (TYP.) SLOPE PERCENTAGE NOT TO EXCEED I. "ALL LOOSE SOIL AND DEBRIS WHICH MAY CREATE A POTENTIAL HAZARD TO OFFSITE PROPERTY A SITE INSPECTION SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE BMPS AND THE OVER-ALL SITE EVERY =1 I1 1 I 11 -I 0% -25% 20' SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE." 4 ! Z 24-HOURS DURING AN EXTENDED RAIN EVENT. '1-111E111 0 50% O J. ALL SILT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL DEVICES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EACH -III-I I IE11 20% - 15 _ 1_111E111-1
RAINSTORM. 111EI I I-I I IE11 1-111=111- OVER 50% 10' ~ 5 A SITE INSPECTION SHALL BE PERFORMED WITHIN 48-HOURS AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. _ _ _ U K. THE DETENTION BASIN SHALL BE SECURED WITH A TEMPORARY FENCE WHENEVER THE DEPTH OF — 11-111-111-11 _ 11E111E111E111- 11E111E111E111 111E111E111E111E111E111E11 - D WATER EXCEEDS TWO FEET.THE DEVICE SHALL BE DRAINED OR PUMPED DRY WITHIN 24 HOURS 1 I—- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UPON IDENTIFYING FAILURES OR OTHER SHORTCOMINGS, AS DIRECTED BY THE QSP, DISCHARGERS SHALL BEGIN -III-III—I —I11=III=III=11I-III—III=11I I- AFTER EACH RAINSTORM. 6 II1E111 III_ III III III III III-III-III- VELOCITY CHECK DAM SPACING ~ IMPLEMENTING REPAIRS OR DESIGN CHANGES TO BMPs WITHIN 72 HOURS OF IDENTIFICATION AND COMPLETE THE -IIIEI 1=CRO_SS BAR_RIERI=III=111E 11=111- L. "THE PLACEMENT OF ADDITIONAL DEVICES TO REDUCE EROSION DAMAGE WITHIN THE SITE IS LEFT 1=111=111=11 I-111-111E111E111E111-_-111-III-- N TO THE DISCRETION OF THE SITE QSP. CHANGES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. =111E111E111-111-111E111E111-11 111E111-111-11 - STREET GRADE INTERVAL Z -III-III-III-III-III-III—I I Obi I I-III-III-III-III- 0 M. "DESILTING BASINS MAY NOT BE REMOVED OR MADE IN-OPERABLE BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1 TO 7 FOR EACH INSPECTION REQUIRED, DISCHARGERS SHALL COMPLETE AN INSPECTION CHECKLIST USING A FORM "1111� 111E111E111E111=11 - 111E111E111E111=111= 1 0%-2°%0 200' C.)APRIL 15 WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE FIELD ENGINEER." ' =111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111E111 4%=111-111- ° _ ° PROVIDED BY THE STATE WATER BOARD OR REGIONAL WATER BOARD OR IN AN ALTERNATIVE FORMAT. 111111-111=III=III=III=III=III=111*=111=III=111 _ 2i0 ai0 100' �1-I 111 I I-111-_I 1 i- I -1 I II I I-I I 1 I 1-11 4%-10% 50' fX N. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE MODIFIED AS NEEDED AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES,AND "-I 1- ' -"'- 0 PLANS OF THESE CHANGES SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL AS REQUIRED. 8 DISCHARGERS SHALL ENSURE THAT CHECKLISTS SHALL REMAIN ONSITE WITH THE S.W.P.P.P. L.- 9 ALL INSPECTION REPORTS SHALL BE EMAILED TO THE LRP AND QSP WITHIN 24-HOURS OF EACH INSPECTION. ANY SILT FENCE (SE-1) I— CORRECTIVE ACTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTION SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 48-HOURS OF THE CORRECTIVE o N.T.S. 0 ACTION BEING NOTED. Z

PLEASE REFER TO THE SWPPP FOR
ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL 10 THE S.W.P.P.P. AND THIS PLAN SHALL BE CONSIDERED INTEGRATED AS PART OF EACH DOCUMENT. I REQUIREMENTS. EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: > CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO ADHERE fY TO THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT, ESTIMATED GRADING DATES:

STATE WATER RESOURCE CONTROL BOARD. AO INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL A. Z BASIS O F BEARINGS © INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS WITH INLET PROTECTION START : NOVEMBER 15, 2021 OWNER ENGINEER GEOTECHNICAL AS SHOWN ON DETAIL B. FINISH : JANUARY 15, 2022 GEOTEK, INC. THE BEARING OF N89°58'31"E ALONG THE O INSTALL FIBER ROLL PER DETAIL C OR SILT FENCE PER DETAIL H LU KB HOME MADOLE &ASSOCIATES, INC. 1548 NORTH MAPLE STREET CENTERLINE OF 15TH STREET,AS SHOWN CC 36310 INLAND VALLEY DRIVE 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE, SUITE 230 CORONA, CA 92880 DO CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL D 0_ ON TRACT MAP No. 11631,AS PER M.B. 158
CONTACT: ANNA M. SCOTTOR A RATTLE PLATE SYSTEM (SIZE DETERMINED DURING 24-HOUR EMERGENCY CONTACT Underground Service Alert WILDOMAR, CA 92595 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91730 PHONE: 951-710-1160 /53-62, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF CONSTRUCTION TO SATISFACTION OF INSPECTORS). gCONTACT: JONATHON SIEMSEN CONTACT: MARK BERTONE THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE DAVE HAUGEN 0909 481-6322 GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO.2481-CR OF CALIFORNIA,WAS USED AS THE BASIS la INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL E. (909)730-1979 CALL PHONE: 951-691-5300 ( ) PREPARED BY GeoTek, Inc. '�>\ TOLL FREE SEPTEMBER 3, 2020 OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. 0 INSTALL/APPLY WIND PROTECTION AS NEEDED PER WE-1. 81 1 DATE:TURE: 0 STREET SWEEPING PER SE-7. cp E
1- LICENSE NUMBER:

TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG EC01 0 WDID: 8 36C395058
U CD 1 co T CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO. 9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT 0-)-, 03FESS�v A.M. CITY OF UPLAND TM20245 cN co
i DESCRIPTION: L. I I 55- 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN THE MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP'VD MN _' NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC CATCH BASIN, MA D O L E 9002 Pm AVE,, 230 ����� �9TJ'G� DESIGNED BY: Ln Ln
64'N/0 C/L 15th STREET AND 35'W/0 C/L CAMPUS RANCHO CUCAMONOA,CA.9730 3 No, 36637 c A.M. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU DATE TRACT NO. 20245 7 AVENUE. ASSOCIATES, INC. PHONE 9o9481.8322 Exp: 06-30-22 * CHECKED BY: RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 0 °° DATE: 1986 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.4818320 , Q M.B. RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF I 0 SHEETS jELEV: 1425.286' _ _ _ �9TFOFCA -„c_ RECOMMENDED BY: EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAWING NO. Lii WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION TITLE SHEET GP ;1g9 92 U. c{744

I
)AORT
\N 43 O OR���d OC ` 1 `\ (1430) )A OR© :•/ . ................................................................... ................. ....

X.............rsrrrrrrrrrcrr.rrrrr...........r......»..............••••••••••............. ...........•••••••••••............•••••••••••............•..•..•••............••••...•••. ` _/ 1,,et• \ `\ ` �� •"'"'""*""" •-•-•"'" •-•-•-•"'*104 ACCOMMODATE Y a •-•-•-•-•-•- - - - - - -��-�-� ' ANTICIPATED �� `� NV NON-VISIBLE POLLUTANT-SAMPLE LOCATION 0 INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL E. LLI z p �� - - B TRAFFIC e01'• „c ��' O ix
TYPICAL GRAVELBAG DETAIL �� *c* \�\, PL PROPERTY LINE INSTALL/APPLY WIND PROTECTION AS NEEDED PER WE-1.

Underground Service Alert N.T.S. x i ®� SUPPLY WATER F� R/W RIGHT OF WAY 0 STREET SWEEPING PER SE-7. w TO WASH WHEELS
CALL GRAVELBAG DETAIL (SE-8) IF NECESSARY. PROP. PROPOSED A TYP. TYPICAL 0 ill 'I � TOLL FREE N.T.S. 50 MIN' T SBCFCD SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 8 ����\ PLAN FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT �, 81 1 B INLET PROTECTION DETAIL (SE-10) N.T.S.

U STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / EXIT (TC-1) N.T.S. T N TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG N.T.S. WDID: 8 36C395058 W
EC -026-
i CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO.9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT co L PREEN A.M. CITY OF UPLAND TM20245 i DESCRIPTION: L, I I 55- 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN THE MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP'VD NORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC CATCH BASIN, ark A D O L E 9�02 R,-� ,AyE,BEE 2�0 ���'�� �9��� DESIGNED BY: co N
64'N/O C/L 15th STREET AND 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS Q� RANCHO qCALM3A,CA,9730 3 No. 36637 c Q A.M. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU DATE TRACT NO. 20245 `� AVENUE. & ASSOCIATES, INC. PHOI�E�909A8L6322 Expi 06-30-22 CHECKED BY: RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 8 0 c-i°° DATE: 1986 Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909ABL6320 * * M.B.B RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF � 0 SHEETS j ELEV: 1425.286' _ �9TFOF�L1-All RECOMMENDED BY: EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAWING NO. c) WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION PLAN SHEET GP g . . 93 0 a744

10 OR 0
(i4 ) O OR 0 •••�I,,,:� /// fi "II*. 30 ���` ,b0. ?, ■ ■- — �- — — _ _ • ��lli• \�Y RP ' 41 ° � ATTACHMENT 8
I*- � 0.50% 111. 0 50% � ti IV 1 1>g 9 Prior to obtaining a permit for clearing and grubbing, stockpile, or rough grading, the applicant shall install a dust / „J 320 // control sign on the property as indicated below. After installation of signage, inspection will be required. If you 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 D I I FL I FG / ( � TYP 33 +I have any questions, please contact Michael Frasure "Department Inspection Supervisor at(909)477-2710 ext. ' 14
(1425) (1425) -- t5°�° 4217.

GENERAL INFORMATION
r
•`�`' o �� (1420) III _ 1) Sign thickness should be 5/8 or 3/4 inch CDX laminated plywood board, overall size of 48"x96" (4 feet by `
�St (1420)
'� �� 8 feet). ..'''v _ I I I 2) Signage must be located within 50 feet of each project site entrance.

4. / — - _ / / / 1 1 _ THIS PROJECT CALL:
v ,10/
m ytA 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 l
.1,11
If you do not receive a response,please call
\ / 43 (1 ) 0430 I 1 \8.1 The AQMD at 1-800-CUT-SMOG t / r:'
1 / , / /// `�'�Jl P —Y—J - 1�01 T T- j TT CONSTRUCT W .fi ��� T ;v T . 1 1 V `�5 ROCKCRIPRAP 011) 1 I I - ' °a E 1.1°�° 6'min to 7'max from the finished grade w
1 / \ �i 2.3% ,AP f/-56 TTo I� _ A witi//Imai!/////atam������i���111U������1i!maimmom1U������1 marimmitomwmawari!!!!!!/////dumwavar=/111!mmind/AWt W=_I1111111IIII/mAim immommim i mmmmn amiiiii. uaaaa MIMI .. ii ......... ......... Embedded into the ground or placed on a ■ ■ ■ O O I/ � O OR O A OR C NSTRUCT A TYP. REET T O — 23 1 P a g e

C NCRETED
• \ I I (1425) (1425) RO K RIPRAP -_� IP ■ ■ ■1 I �
\ I I �/ ►� / TYP. I I
I I
0201 \ \ - I I LEGEND: Z NV-1 1T\ I_i
I
`�� PROPOSED GRAVELBAGS i■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ : i■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ : i■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ : i b I I (POLY GRAVEL BAGS) b COARSE AGGREGATE U
■ VEHICLE � ■ MATERIAL � ■ WASTE 1� 11 it 11 �s W
STORAGES ■ ' STORAGE ■ . STORAGE ■ j \ i I 10 I_I 3 INLET PROTECTION 0
U . ■ ■ I 140 I 110
i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■* i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■* i ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■* I ��k 0 ICI; Z
48 47 46 45 44 • ki���( s1 �D1) , X INDICATES 6 FT.HIGH 1 J I ���� ���' I CHAIN LINK FENCE.

I ,.Gi �e � I: (1420) �� ` PROPOSED FIBER ROLL T _ T ♦�'�'lea I ? 0 / I.W �I ��, I� (1420) IT IT TEMPORARY BMPLi— ‘‘‘A‘‘‘‘‘Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiitlitytt ttn�‘ ‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘�.‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘vo i'liiiiiiiiiiii i «« ««««� «««« BONDED FIBER MATRIX T° ° ° (BFM) S1 STORM WATER SAMPLE
LOCATION z
' CO
OOR® OORO 0 1ST STREET
KDI)RO-# LOCATION OF POSSIBLE RUN-ON 0
SITE DISCHARGE LOCATION U
NV NON-VISIBLE POLLUTANT-SAMPLE LOCATION IY F-
PL PROPERTY LINE if)
—�� ��— R/W RIGHT OF WAY \\ I /�
\\ //
PROP. U
\\ /7 TYP. TYPICAL \\ // r -- r --- SBCFCD SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY I:I I I I / FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 0 1 1 Li— ______I 1 I II 1— THIS PLAN IS FOR SWPPP EROSION & z
13TH ALTA MONTE VERDE AVENUE AVENUE GRAVEL BAG SPACING TABLE AVENUE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICE STREET GRADE INTERVAL PLACEMENT ONLY. SEE >- 11 0%-2% 200' APPROPRIATE IMPROVEMENT PLAN a 0 30 SCALE 6I�N FEET 90 20 EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION NOTES.• 2% 00�0 100' FOR CONSTRUCTION ? mlmrmi AO INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL A. - Q © INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS WITH INLET PROTECTION W AS SHOWN ON DETAIL B. SLOPE PROTECTION AT TOE AND FACE OF O INSTALL FIBER ROLL PER DETAIL C OR SILT FENCE PER DETAIL F SLOPE Underground Service Alert rt0 CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL D TABLE 1-CRITICAL SLOPE/SHEET FLOW LENGTH COMBINATIONS 9 jri'? OR A RATTLE PLATE SYSTEM (SIZE DETERMINED DURING CALL CONSTRUCTION TO SATISFACTION OF INSPECTORS). SLOPE PERCENTAGE SHEET FLOW LENGTH IT © NOT TO EXCEED
ill
1� TOLL FREE INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL E. 0% -25% 20' ot-
i81 14) INSTALL/APPLY WIND PROTECTION AS NEEDED PER WE-1. , 0 STREET SWEEPING PER SE-7. 20% -50% 15' T OVER 50% 10'
TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG _} WDID: 8 36C395058 EC -03 CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK N0.9D 86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT cn (1-zoFESS.04/ A M CITY OF UPLAND TM20245 cii DESCRIPTION: L, I 4 R,-� ,AVE,,BuTE 230 �9�PG DESIGNED BY: Lo N
64'N/O C/L 15th STREET AND 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS & RANCHO q�AMplpp�CA gp�p 3 No, 36637 c A.M. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU DATE TRACT NO. 20245 9 ASSOCIATES, INC. � gp� _ _ RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 o AVENUE. Expi 06 30 22 * CHECKED BY: z c-i°° DATE: 1986 Engineering Communities for Life FAX 909ABL8a20 *, Q M.B. RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 1 0 SHEETS jELEV: 1425.286' - �9TFOF�L1�O��ti RECOMMENDED BY: EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAWING NO. Li - WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION PLAN SHEET GP �4g08i94 o1744

„,,,,
�••�"�•�� ►►► ►►►"'�� /�� 4///;�� PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST. SEWER LINE. /1 1•._, G / ���� POTHOLE AND VERIFY LOCATION &ELEVATION , / DAYLIGHT BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES IN AREA Q OR O 1 )

I FLII I
I 3FC2. (14d0) — —�
4__ \_/ �---„, 1425 ti — _ —��
T 1 ^ MI ' 1 �� (1427) \____--,—1� T + �14�� \ �`` � PROTECT IN PLACE EXIST.WATER LINE. — I / ,•1.`�. / POTHOLE AND VERIFY LOCATION &ELEVATION 'r / N BEFORE ANY WORK COMMENCES IN THIS AREA
I ---1- ----N._ _-------\'--K' ----- N__ / / N z **.S 1415) I I„. 20-{ I I / — - - - - — I 1410 I / �1 ��--1�4 I I I l egSFweR 11 / `� :, I s 14Jo� I I l FMeNr l / \ p OR© EXIST. HABITAT AREA APR© .

CD — kr -- 32.0 T _ _ (1415) '0 (TO REMAIN UNDISTURBED I FG 1 , a — /� / / ' . PROTECT IN PLACE) 1 1 1 �` �/ —1406 I T I I (1415) Ij--:::) / / ` �'. DAYLIGHT W _ F I v '\_�� I �1415) I I I I :::- // / ''•1.�•k�` (NO WORK, NO ACCESS/ INGRESS, NO STORAGE) 732.0
14L0 I II I _ / / 4.

W / I I I I I I I / vv= 14 I I ^ A
,�x� -� i- rvv r Iwvr vv1v VIM—ILv ��__ME RCIK RIPRAP / , / ' ; iV �.:

YLV ..• /
INU ,) �y FL 7sh.�,• � _ ” CONSTRUCT CONI,Kt I tu /.u��.l iOl s`l�s�l���l�o�d�s�d>. ,�,•►%''► /
dil.�, 'ii ;� `� .L, vna `�,,,' ROCK DIDDADmi PIPNAke:ii4:51E,AtiteWit:',Jezq Int s s s (1425)
eVA
0Wit?: i � I _ LIMIT OF WORK I j .ram, 1-401,-,_ _ — _ — _ A _ 1 4FS 0 \ /04,31 A Ann DAYLIGHT / (1430) �� i I_� -� ...� _ _ � � 428.8 428.8 ,�FL Is' \32.0 FG
��'JS 28.5 FS o z �� In FS / FL 32.2 N O O OR© 432.3 432.3 `—CONSTRUCT jt ` al° / FS . _ OR C O FS \ — 129� — _42�0— / FS CONCRETED \30.48— — — — — — — — —\-� •" ..............1.1.1.1•.1.1.01.0.•0,•.�.❖r.•rr.•rrr.❖.❖.❖....❖...❖oc;.%❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.❖.•o.❖.❖.❖.❖..❖.❖.❖.❖.•/•/•//•/•/❖/•/•/•/❖/❖.❖o..;.•/•/❖ ,.......................................•••••.......... — - ii4_., , IP`c, ROCK RIPRAP • ‘c FS / J� T I — �� 9°I° �,,��, ..........,................ ............•................. O(FIBER ROLL) ( ) o N 0(FIBER ROLL) CONSTRUCT CONCRETED �° ' 0) I �— I I I N w I i�i :,i�i :.' 0OR© 1430 (14,�0) ,,' ROCK RIPRAP .:.__._,._:.r_.

1.1% .i` r ........q• Ipp0000001pppppgppppp••••••••••••••;•••:a•••••••••••••••••••••.vvvvvvvvvvvn•vvvn...v.nv -- - _ - ?i14�J \28.28 /\��.68 .O► ..........Iq..oa....►... ...u.........,_uvv.............1.......1......................u... /././4•/•pppl•/././././.0/•pppppOp/vvvvv...vvv.vvvn.....nn...................v........................ ;:: z:.i.z,�_'::,�::;,'�s::,'r:: ) Q ° FS a6,la / FS 424.E ,:..,:....................................�.......... x .................................................................... _zL
�, i' - -/ — •,,:-r:•a�!o.❖a.•..1.1.�.1.1.1.1.1.�..•... .. ................................... ................. _ROLLS L (FIBER ROLL) 418.5 n � It.%G:.it./ :�%. o (1425) '"""'� s' FL FL - - 0427) n �� .�.►�'' aN.at..It 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1..................................................................... ,. ,�.. I 4a _,
—
— W ,, 1 _ — o ,..._
01 Q z
0 ,_
(1420) .

D
1 1 I 1 1 1 ,x v)
z
15TH STREET
15TH STREET 0 1/ _ i, 0 L.._
0 z
1 EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION NOTES SCALE IN FEET " z AO INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL A. 0 30 60 90 120 THIS PLAN IS FOR SWPPP EROSION & © INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS WITH INLET PROTECTION mlmimlmiIlQ W AS SHOWN ON DETAIL B. ci SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICECK O INSTALL FIBER ROLL PER DETAIL C OR SILT FENCE PER DETAIL F PLACEMENT ONLY. SEE 0_Underground Service A I e rt DO CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PER DETAIL D n Lc, OR A RATTLE PLATE SYSTEM (SIZE DETERMINED DURING QQ( ( APPROPRIATE IMPROVEMENT PLAN CALL CONSTRUCTION TO SATISFACTION OF INSPECTORS). U FOR CONSTRUCTION Lu
I� TOLL FREE 0 INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL E. ���� I 81 1 Q INSTALL/APPLY WIND PROTECTION AS NEEDED PER WE-1.

N �, O STREET SWEEPING PER SE-7.

J
TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG _} WDID: 8 36C395058 E - 4 c_D w
CO
7 oo CITY OF UPLAND BENCH MARK NO.9D-86 REVISIONS Prepared Under The Supervision Of: DRAWN BY: APPROVAL BY: PROJECT C_D (":13FESS/84/,, cra A.M. CITY OF UPLAND TM2024500 CD i DESCRIPTION: L, I ' I 2"CITY OF UPLAND BRASS DISC SET IN THE MARK DATE BY DESCRIPTION DATE APP'VDNORTHWEST CORNER OF A PCC CATCH BASIN, MADOLE R,-� ,AVE,,BuTE 233 �9�PG DESIGNED BY:

N
co
64'N/O C/L 15th STREET AND 35'W/O C/L CAMPUS Q� RANCHO CUCAMONQA,CA MO 3 No. 36637 c P A.M. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: BRADEN YU DATE TRACT NO. 20245 Ot ASSOCIATES, INC. PHOIE�A8101 _ _ RCE: 56306 EXP DATE: 12-31-22 1 0 0 AVENUE. Expi 06 30 22 * CHECKED BY: z °° DATE: 1986 Engineering Communities for Life FAX 909ABL8a20 *, Q M.B. RECOMMENDED BY RECOMMENDED BY OF 0 SHEETS z jELEV: 1425.286' _ �9TF,„ /L1�O��ti RECOMMENDED BY: EROSION CONTROL PLAN DRAWING N0. LLI - WENDELL L. IWATSURU RCE 36637 DATE: ENGINEERING STAFF LAND DEVELOPMENT&TRANSPORTATION PLAN SHEET GP ��_ a o tar: . 95 01 i744

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA
L SA
April 2025

This page intentionally left blank

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA
Submitted to:

Joshua Winter, Senior Planner
City of Upland
Development Services Department/Planning Division
460 North Euclid Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Prepared by:

LSA
157 Park Place
Pt. Richmond, California 94801
510.236.6810
Project No. TCl2201
L SA
April 2025

This page intentionally left blank

FINAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA r``

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS iii

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1

1.1 Purpose of the Final EIR 1-1

1.2 Environmental Review Process 1-1

1.3 Document Organization 1-2

1.4 Use of Final EIR 1-2

2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS 2-1

2.1 Organization of Comment Letters and Responses 2-1

2.2 List of Comments on the Draft and Recirculated Draft EIR 2-1 A. Local Agencies 2-1
B. Native American Parties 2-1
C. Individuals 2-2
D. Other Parties 2-2

3.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 3-1
A. Local Agencies 3-3
B. Native American Parties 3-9
C. Individuals 3-29
D. Other Parties 3-123

4.0 RECIRCULATED DRAFT EIR TEXT REVISIONS 4-1

FIGURES
Figure 3-1: Regional and Project Location 4-5
PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\Covers_TOC.docx(04/01/25) i

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J�` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
ii P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\Covers_TOC.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L S A APRIL 2025 UPLAND, CALIFORNIA

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AB Assembly Bill
amsl above mean sea level
Basin South Coast Air Basin
CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
City City of Upland
Final EIR Final Environmental Impact Report
LOS level of service
NOP Notice of Preparation
project Villa Serena Specific Plan Project
Recirculated DEIR Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report SAA Streambed Alteration Agreement
SB Senate Bill
SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
YSMN Yuhaaviatam of San Manual Nation
P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\Covers_TOC.docx(04/01/25) III

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J�` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
iv P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\Covers_TOC.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 PURPOSE OF THE FINAL EIR
This Final Environmental Impact Report (Final EIR) has been prepared to respond to comments received on the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report(Recirculated DEIR) prepared for the proposed Villa Serena Specific Plan Project (project).This document also describes project changes, provides supplemental analysis in response to comments, and makes revisions to the Recirculated DEIR, as necessary, resulting from those comments or to clarify material in the Draft EIR.

According to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15132,the Final EIR shall consist of(1)the Draft EIR or a revision of the draft; (2) comments and recommendations received on the Draft EIR either verbatim or in summary; (3) a list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the Draft EIR; (4)the responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process; and (5) any other information added by the Lead Agency.

This document, together with the Recirculated DEIR, constitutes the Final EIR for the project.

1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS
According to Sections 15086 and 15087 of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines, lead agencies are required to consult with public agencies having jurisdiction over a proposed project and to provide the general public with an opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR.

The City circulated a Notice of Preparation (NOP) informing responsible agencies and interested parties that an EIR would be prepared for the proposed project.The NOP was published on February 8, 2022 and mailed to public agencies, organizations, property owners near the site, and individuals likely to be interested in the potential impacts of the proposed project.A scoping session was held as a public meeting on June 8, 2022,to solicit feedback regarding the scope and content of the EIR. Both verbal comments and written comments were received from members of the public during the scoping period and were considered during preparation of this EIR. Copies of the NOP, comment letters, and a summary of the verbal comments received are included in Appendix A.

The Draft EIR circulated for public review from May 28, 2024,to July 11, 2024, pursuant to Section 15105(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines. A complete hardcopy of the Draft EIR and all appendices were made available for review at the City of Upland Community Development, Planning Division and the City of Upland Public Library.These documents were also available in their entirety online at https://www.uplandca.gov/environmental-review.The Draft EIR and associated technical appendices were uploaded to the State Clearinghouse and made available electronically for public and agency review.The Notice of Availability(NOA)for the Draft EIR was provided to all individuals and organizations who provided a written request for notice, residents in the vicinity of the project, and filed with the San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board.

P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\1.0Introduction FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 1-1

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``` CITY,STATE APRIL 2025
Due to a distribution error and the receipt of additional information,the City conservatively "recirculated"the EIR for a second full 45-day review period. A second full 45-day review period extended from November 4, 2024 to December 18, 2024. A complete hardcopy of the Recirculated DEIR and all appendices were made available for review at the City of Upland Community Development, Planning Division and the City of Upland Public Library.These documents were also available in their entirety online at https://www.uplandca.gov/environmental-review.The Recirculated DEIR and associated technical appendices were uploaded to the State Clearinghouse and made available electronically for public and agency review.The NOA for the Recirculated DEIR was provided to all individuals and organizations who provided a written request for notice, residents in the vicinity of the Project, and filed with the San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board.

The City received a total of 22 comment letters from regional agencies,tribal parties, and individuals during the two rounds of review. Copies of all written comments received during the comment periods are included in Chapter 3.0, Comments and Responses, of this document.

1.3 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION
This document consists of the following chapters:
• Chapter 1.0: Introduction.This chapter discusses the purpose and organization of this Final EIR and responses to comments and summarizes the environmental review process for the project. • Chapter 2.0: List of Commenters. This chapter contains a list of agencies, parties, and individuals who submitted written comments during the public review period. • Chapter 3.0: Comments and Responses.This chapter contains reproductions of all comment letters received on the Draft EIR and Recirculated DEIR.A written response for each CEQA- related comment received during the public review period is provided. Each response is keyed to the corresponding comment.
• Chapter 4.0: Draft EIR Text Revisions. Corrections to the Recirculated DEIR that are necessary in light of the comments received and responses provided or are necessary to amplify or clarify material in the Recirculated DEIR are contained in this chapter. Double underlined text represents language that has been added to the Recirculated DEIR;text with strikeout has been deleted from the Recirculated DEIR.

1.4 USE OF FINAL EIR
The Final EIR will be used by the City of Upland, as Lead Agency,for the following purposes. • The City of Upland Planning Commission, as a recommending body, will hold a public hearing and consider whether to recommend to the City Council approval of the project described in the Final EIR and associated actions, and certification of the Final EIR for the project. • The City of Upland City Council, as the final approval body, will hold a public hearing following the Planning Commission hearing to consider approving the project, associated actions, and certification of the Final EIR for the project.
1-2 P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR Final EIR\1.O Introduction FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
The Final EIR may also be used by other State, regional, and local agencies, as responsible agencies under CEQA, in considering other actions required for the project.

P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\1.0Introduction FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 1-3

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``` CITY,STATE APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
1-4 P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\1.0 Introduction FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L S A APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA

2.0 LIST OF COMMENTERS
This chapter presents a list of comment letters received during the public review periods and describes the organization of the letters and comments that are provided in Chapter 3.0, Comments and Responses, of this document.

2.1 ORGANIZATION OF COMMENT LETTERS AND RESPONSES
Chapter 3.0 includes a reproduction of each comment letter received on the Draft EIR and the Recirculated DEIR.The letters are grouped by the affiliation of the commenting entity as follows:
local agencies, (A); Native American parties, (B); individuals, (C); and other parties, (D). Please note, no regional, State, or federal agencies responded during the comment periods.

The comment letters are numbered consecutively following the A through D designations and follow the format below:
• Local Agencies A-#-#
• Native American Parties B-#-#
• Individuals C-#-#
• Other Parties D-#-#
The letters are numbered and comments within each letter are numbered consecutively after the hyphen. For example, Letter A-1 represents the local agency letter, and comment A-1-1 represents the first enumerated comment within that letter.

2.2 LIST OF COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT AND RECIRCULATED DRAFT EIR The following comment letters were submitted to the City during the public review periods.

A. Local Agencies
A-1: County of San Bernardino, Department of Public Works, Nancy Sansonetti,AICP, Supervising Planner(September 26, 2024)1.

B. Native American Parties
B-1: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation,Andrew Salas, Chairman (June 6, 2024) B-2: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation, Brandy Salas,Administrative Specialist (June 14, 2024)
B-3 Yuhaaviatam of San Manual Nation, Kristen Tuosto,Tribal Archeologist(November 7, 2024)
1 Although received in the period between the two public reviews,the City has elected to respond to these letters.

P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\2.0 List of Commenters FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 2-1

L S A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT UPLAND,CALIFORNIA FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT APRIL 2025
C. Individuals
C-1: David Nasca, (June 3, 2024)
C-2: Max and Marti Schneider(June 7, 2024)
C-3: Tom and Susan James (June 10, 2024)
C-4: Carol Borchers (June 11, 2024)
C-5: David Coleman (June 24, 2024)
C-6: Cindy Mastic (July 10, 2024)
C-7: Robyn and Nathan Tan (July 11, 2024)
C-8: Natasha Walton (July 11, 2024)
C-9: Cathy Cushman (August 23, 2024)1
C-10: Stephen Wullkopf(September 4, 2024)1
C-11: Dennis Ferncez (December 11, 2024)
C-12: Darell Maxey (December 14, 2024)
C-13: Joe Bradley (December 18, 2024)
C-14: Bill Rodstrom (December 18, 2024)
C-15: Natasha Walton (December 18, 2024)
C-16: Larry Johnson (August 4, 2024)1
C-17: Shari Wasson (December 18, 2024)
D. Other Parties
D-1: Southern California Gas Company(August 30, 2024)1 1 Although received in the period between the two public reviews,the City has elected to respond to these letters.
2-2 P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\2.0 List of Commenters FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA

3.0 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21091(d) and the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15088, a lead agency is required to evaluate comments received during the noticed comment period and prepare a written response for each comment relating to any significant environmental issues raised on the Draft or Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Written responses to the comment received on the documents during the public review and comment periods are provided in this chapter. All comments received during the public review periods are provided in their entirety. Each comment is immediately followed by responses keyed to the specific comments.The comments are grouped by the affiliation of the commenting entity as follows: local agencies, (A); Native American parties, (B); individuals, (C); and other parties, (D).

The written responses presented in this chapter describe the nature of any significant environmental issues raised and provide a good-faith, reasoned analysis in response.The range of responses includes providing clarification, making factual corrections, explaining why certain comments may not warrant further response, or simply acknowledging the comment for consideration by the decision-making bodies.

As described in Chapter 1.0, Introduction,the Draft EIR and Recirculated Draft EIR Comments and Response to Comments (RTC) (Chapter 3.0), and Recirculated Draft EIR revisions (Chapter 4.0), together with the Recirculated Draft EIR and supporting appendices, constitute the Final EIR. At least 10 days prior to certifying an EIR,the City of Upland (City) must provide a written response to a public agency on comments made by that agency. Responses shall conform with the legal standards established for responses to comments on draft environmental impacts.

Where comments on the Draft EIR or Recirculated Draft EIR concern issues requiring technical expertise,the responses to comments, like the analysis in the Recirculated Draft EIR, rely on the knowledge and professional analysis of qualified experts.

Text revisions to the Recirculated Draft EIR are provided in Chapter 4.0 of this document.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-1

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-2 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L S A APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
A. LOCAL AGENCIES
A-1: County of San Bernardino, Department of Public Works, Nancy Sansonetti,AICP, Supervising Planner(September 26, 2024)
P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-3

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3_4 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment A-1
Main Office-825 East Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 I Phone:909.387.7910 Fax: 909.387.7911 www.SBCounty.gov
Department of Public Works Noel Castillo, P.E.

Director
SAN BERNARDINO • Flood Control • Special Districts COUNTY • Operations • Surveyor David Doublet, M.S., P.E. • Solid Waste Management • Transportation Assistant Director September 26, 2024
Transmitted Via Email
File: 10(ENV)-4.01
City of Upland
Attn: Joshua Winter, Senior Planner
Development Services Department
Planning Division
460 N. Euclid Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
[email protected]
RE: CEQA — NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY (NOA) OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL (EIR) [VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT (SCH# 2022020150)] Dear Mr. Winter:

Thank you for allowing the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. We received this request on August 26, 2024, and pursuant to our review, the following comments are provided:

Flood Control Planning Division (Michael Fam, P.E., Engineering Manager, 909- 387-7995):

1. We are aware there may be storm drains in and around the site that may be affected by the proposed Project. When planning for or altering existing or future storm drains, be advised that the Project is subject to the San Bernardino County A-1-1 Flood Control District Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan No. 1, dated July 1966.

It is to be used as a guideline for drainage in the area and is available in the County Flood Control Offices. Any revision to the drainage should be reviewed and approved by the jurisdictional agency in which the revision occurs.

We respectfully request to be included on the circulation list for all project notices, public reviews, or public hearings. In closing, I would like to thank you again for allowing the A-1-2 San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. Should you have any questions or need additional clarification, please contact the individual who provided the specific comment, as listed above.

Sincerely,
Nance SansoneW
Nancy J. Sansonetti, AICP
Supervising Planner
Environmental Management Division
NS:AS:ml
Cc: Ayida Smith

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment A-1
County of San Bernardino, Department of Public Works
Nancy Sansonetti,AICP, Supervising Planner
September 26, 2024
Response to Comment A-1-1
This comment indicated that storm drains in and around the project site that may be affected by the project would be subject to San Bernardino County Flood Control District Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan No. 1.The comment further stated Storm Drain Plan No. 1 may be used as a guidance for drainage in the project area, and any revision to the drainage should be reviewed and approved appropriately.

This comment is noted and does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment A-1-2
The commenter requests to be included on the circulation list for all notices, public review, or public hearings related to the project.

Pursuant to CEQA requirements, the City must provide a written responses to public agency comments at least 10 days prior to certifying an EIR.The San Bernardino County Department of Public Works will be notified as requested.This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-7

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-8 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
B. NATIVE AMERICAN PARTIES
B-1: Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation,Andrew Salas, Chairman (June 6, 2024)
B-2: South Coast Air Quality Management District, Sam Wang, Program Supervisor (January 30, 2024)
B-3 Yuhaaviatam of San Manual Nation (YSMN), Kristen Tuosto,Tribal Archeologist (November 7, 2024)
P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-9

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-10 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment B-1
V. d"�' GA5KIELENO BAND OF M1551ON INDIAN5 - KIZLI NATION 0-%1_ historically known as The San Gabriel band of Mission Indians recognized by 3a the `state of California as the aboriginal tribe of the Los Angeles basin Nat+ `
June 6,2024
Project Name: Villa Serena Specific Plan Project, City of Upland, CA Thank you for your letter. Regarding the project above. This is to concur that we agree with the Specific Plan Amendment. However, our Tribal government would like to request consultation for all B-1-1 future projects within this location.

Andrew Salas, Chairman
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation
Andrew Salas,Chairman Nadine Salas,Vice-Chairman Dr.Christina Swindall Martinez,secretary Albert Perez,treasurer I Martha Gonzalez Lemos,treasurer II Richard Gradias, Chairman of the council of Elders ro box 595 Covina,CA 91725 [email protected] [email protected]

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-12 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment B-1
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation
Andrew Salas, Chairman
June 6, 2024
Response to Comment B-1-1
The Kizh Nation agrees with the project and requests consultation with the City on future projects at the project site.

Pursuant to notification requirements of Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52),the City initiated consultation with the Kizh Nation on June 28, 2023. During consultation,the Kizh Nation stated that the project site is within the ancestral territory and traditional use area of their respective tribes.Although no Native American resources were identified on-site, the Recirculated Draft EIR includes measures to reduce potential impacts that may result from the inadvertent discovery of Native American cultural resources during project-related ground disturbance activities.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the content or analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-13

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-14 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment B-2
From: Gabrieleno Administration
Sent: Friday,June 14, 2024 11:19 AM
To: Joshua Winter
Cc: Kara Grant
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project, City of Upland, CA Dear Joshua,
Following discussions with Chairman Salas, it has been determined that the matter at hand necessitates no further deliberation. Should the city choose to incorporate an additional tribal entity into our ancestral territory, it is imperative that substantial evidence B 2 1 supporting this decision be provided, as mandated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). However, should any significant artifacts be discovered or damaged during this process, it is essential that the city assumes accountability for its actions moving forward.

Best regards,
Brandy Salas
Admin Specialist
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation
PO Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
Office: 844-390-0787
website: www.gabrielenoindians.org
,01 OF*o
u c yZ
m� Ca
i DOVE*
The region where Gabrieleno culture thrived for more than eight centuries encompassed most of Los Angeles County, more than half of Orange County and portions of Riverside and San Bernardino counties. It was the labor of the Gabrieleno who built the missions, ranchos and the pueblos of Los Angeles. They were trained in the trades, and they did the construction and maintenance, as well as the farming and managing of herds of livestock. 'The Gabrieleno are the ones who did all this work, and they really are the foundation of the early economy of the Los Angeles area ". 'That's a contribution that Los Angeles has not recognised--the fact that in its early decades, without the Gabrieleno, the community simply would not have survived."
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 3:39 PM Joshua Winter wrote:

Hi Savannah,

Thank you for the Phone call last week.Andrew had mentioned he would send me an email with confirmation that the mitigation in the EIR os sufficient, and the Consultation is officially closed, and also outlining some concerns regarding the Mitigation included for San Manuel.

Just checking in on that!
Thanks, let me know if you need anything else.

Joshua Winter
Senior PlanneriPlanning Division
Development Services Department
City Of Upland
460 N. Euclid Ave, Upland, CA 91786
Counter Hours:Monday—Thursday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
P:(909)931-4143
F:(909)931-4321
[email protected]
Follow us: Website Facebook Twitter Instagram

4.Ov tr#{
d
11 4/1-00

From:Joshua Winter
Sent:Thursday,June 6, 2024 3:56 PM
To: Gabrieleno Administration
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project, City of Upland, CA Hi Savannah,
We have included all the requested mitigation in the attached email received in response to our AB-52 and SB-18 Notice. I was under the impression our consultation had concluded, so I just want to confirm Kizh Nation is in agreement with the mitigation outlined in the EIR, and that consultation is closed.The Tribal Cultural Resources Section is attached for your convenience.

Thank you!
Joshua Winter
Senior PlanneriPlanning Division
Development Services Department
City Of Upland
460 N. Euclid Ave, Upland, CA 91786
Counter Hours:Monday—Thursday from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm
P:(909)931-4143
F:(909)931-4321
jwinterCcauplandca.gov
Follow us: Website Facebook Twitter Instagram

Y !r .
•
•
From: Gabrieleno Administration
Sent:Thursday,June 6, 2024 3:37 PM
To:Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project, City of Upland, CA WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Hello Joshua Winter,
Thank you for your letter. Please see the attachment below.

Thank you
Sincerely,
Savannah Salas
Admin Specialist
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation

PO Box 393
Covina, CA 91723
Office: 844-390-0787
website: www.gabrielenoindians.org
The region where Gabrieleno culture thrived for more than eight centuries encompassed most of Los Angeles County, more than half of Orange County and portions of Riverside and San Bernardino counties. It was the labor of the Gabrieleno who built the missions, ranchos and the pueblos of Los Angeles. They were trained in the trades, and they did the construction and maintenance, as well as the farming and managing of herds of livestock. "The Gabrielerio are the ones who did all this work, and they really are the foundation of the early economy of the Los Angeles area ". `That's a contribution that Los Angeles has not recogniged--the fact that in its early decades, without the Gabrieleno, the community simply would not have survived."

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-20 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment B-2
Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians— Kizh Nation
Brandy Salas, Administrative Specialist
June 6, 2024
Response to Comment B-2-1
This comment consists of an email exchange between the Kizh Nation and the City.The commenter states no further deliberation related to the project is necessary.The tribe further requested that "substantial evidence" be provided should the City choose to "incorporate an additional tribal entity into our ancestral territory."
Please refer to the response to Comment B-1-1.The initiation of consultation with other tribal entities is required pursuant to State law.The standard of"substantial evidence" is not applicable to or required to consult with other tribal entities. Pursuant to applicable provisions of AB 52,the City initiated contact with other tribal entities cited by the Native American Heritage Commission. During consultation, both the Kizh Nation and Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation stated that the project site is within the ancestral territory and traditional use area of their respective tribes.As required, the City initiated consultation with and considered recommended measures from both tribes.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the content or adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-21

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-22 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment B-3
From: Kristen Tuosto
Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2024 2:59 PM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project (SCH#2022020150) -San Manuel Concerns [CIT-UPL-2023-6]
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
You don't often get email from [email protected] why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Hello Joshua Winter,
Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (YSMN)finds the mitigation measure TCR-2 in conflict with the requested mitigation measures for Tribal Cultural Resources made by YSMN.

When multiple Tribes claim affiliation in the project area, a single consulting Tribe cannot determine the treatment of TCRs. It is preferred to keep claims regarding those TCRs neutral by reburial in place or within the project's footprint.

B-3-1
If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at your convenience, as I will be your Point of Contact(POC)for YSMN with respect to this project. I also left a message for you earlier today to discuss this issue or clarify the concern.

Regards,
Kristen
Kristen Tuosto
Tribal Archaeologist
[email protected]
O:(909) 864-8933 x 50-3421
M:(909) 725-1357
26569 Community Center Dr Highland, California 92346
S4IPEL

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-24 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment B-3
Yuhaaviatam of San Manual Nation (YSMN)
Kristen Tuosto,Tribal Archeologist
November 7, 2024
Response to Comment B-3-1
YSMN finds the mitigation measure TCR-2 in Recirculated Draft EIR conflicts with the requested mitigation measures for Tribal Cultural Resources made by YSMN.The YSMN state that,when multiple tribes claim affiliation in a project area, a single consulting tribe cannot determine the treatment of tribal cultural resources. In these cases, it is preferred to keep the competing claims neutral by requiring reburial in place or within the project's footprint.

Mitigation Measure TCR-2, identified through consultation with the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation, states:

Mitigation Measure TCR-2 Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resource Objects (Non- Funerary/Non-Ceremonial)
a. Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist.The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe's sole discretion, and for any purpose the Tribe deems appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.

Mitigation Measure TCR-4, identified through consultation with the Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (YSMN), states:

Mitigation Measure TCR-4 The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (YSMN) Cultural Resources Department shall be contacted, as detailed in Mitigation Measure CUL-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA(as amended, 2015), by a Monitoring and Treatment Plan (Plan) shall be created by qualified archaeologist, in coordination with YSMN.All subsequent finds shall be subject to the Plan.The Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents YSMN for the remainder of the project, should YSMN elect to place a monitor on-site.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-25

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J�` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
The City's consultation efforts pursuant to AB 52 and SB 18 represent a good faith effort to identify potential impact to tribal cultural resources that may result from the development of the project site. As a conflict between measures has been identified,the following revisions are required.

Mitigation Measures TCR-2 and TCR-4 have been revised as follows:

Mitigation Measure TCR-2 Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural Resource Objects (Non- Funerary/Non-Ceremonial)
Upon discovery of any Tribal Cultural Resource, all construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease (i.e., not less than the surrounding 50 feet) and shall not resume until the discovered TCR has been fully assessed by the Kizh monitor and/or Kizh archaeologist. In the event the material is determined be significant, Mitigation Measure TCR-6 shall apply.The Kizh will recover and retain all discovered TCRs in the form and/or manner the Tribe deems appropriate, in the Tribe's sole discretion, and for any purpose thc Tribc dccms appropriate, including for educational, cultural and/or historic purposes.

Mitigation Measure TCR-4 The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (YSMN) Cultural Resources Department shall be contacted, as detailed in Mitigation Measure CUL-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. In the event the material is determined be significant, Mitigation Measure TCR-6 shall apply. Should h-e find be dccmecl nif,,.-,n+ S defined by CEQA(as amended, 2015), by a Monitoring and Tr atment Plan {Plan) shall be cr ated by qualified archaeologist, in coordination with YSMN. All subsequent finds shall be subject to thc Plan. The Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents YSMN for the remainder of thc project, should YSMN elect to place a monitor on site.

The following measure has been identified to ensure the appropriate mitigation of any potential impact to any tribal cultural material.

Mitigation Measure TCR-6 In the event of any inadvertent discovery of any tribal cultural material, or pre-contact/historic-era resource, determined to be significant,the City shall require the preparation of a Monitoring and Treatment Plan.The monitoring and treatment plan shall be prepared by a qualified archeologist in consultation with and subject to the approval of the City and the consulting Native American tribes.The City and consulting Native American tribes shall engage in mutual good faith efforts to develop the Monitoring 3-26 P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
and Treatment Plan.The monitoring and treatment plan shall identify the manner and process in which any suspected tribal cultural material is evaluated, recorded, removed, or curated, including the final disposition of any such material.

In the event the manner and process of evaluation, recordation, removal, and/or disposition of tribal cultural material cannot be resolved between consulting Native American parties,the City shall, in good faith, identify and approve the necessary actions in the Monitoring and Treatment Plan.

Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5(b), recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications in an adequate EIR.The revisions to Mitigation Measures TCR-2 and TCR-4 and the additional of Mitigation Measure TCR-6 resolves a potential point of conflict between the measures identified in the Recirculated Draft EIR and provides a mutually agreeable method to ensure full and complete mitigation of impact to any potential tribal cultural resource.These revisions provide an equally effective method of mitigation and do not identify a new impact, or an impact of greater severity that previously identified in the Recirculated Draft EIR; therefore, further recirculation is not required. No further response is necessary.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-27

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-28 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L S A APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
C. INDIVIDUALS
C-1: David Nasca, (May 27, 2024)
C-2: Max and Marti Schneider (June 7, 2024)
C-3: Tom and Susan James (June 10, 2024)
C-4: Carol Borchers (June 11, 2024)
C-5: David Coleman (June 24, 2024)
C-6: Cindy Mastic (July 10, 2024)
C-7: Robyn and Nathan Tan (July 11, 2024)
C-8: Natasha Walton (July 11, 2024)
C-9: Cathy Cushman (August 23, 2024)
C-10: Stephen Wullkopf(September 4, 2024)
C-11: Dennis Ferncez (December 11, 2024)
C-12: Darell Maxey (December 14, 2024)
C-13: Joe Bradley(December 18, 2024)
C-14: Bill Rodstrom (December 18, 2024)
C-15: Natasha Walton (December 18, 2024)
C-16: Larry Johnson (August 5, 2024)
C-17: Shari Wasson (December 18, 2024)
P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-29

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-30 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

®r tr.p:t Comment C-1
iA, ,. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
` �,1 PLANNING DIVISION
ity
r?ZjP 0 aVIS Telephone (909) 931-4130
Facsimile(909) 931-4321
May 23, 2024 RECEIVED '7�` Z7 2
Nasca Properties Llc JUN 0 3 2024
481 Georgia Ct
Claremont, CA 91711 CITY OF UPLAND
DEV.SERVICES DEPT.

SUBJECT: VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN- NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY. l 1 ,� ..)e.5 6-r . ks I Pam, e p o r N Tc5 [,J�k , -,- „ S ,
1 t P.r ,t t, ,,ne..s2 ca_v o(leci
offer N2q-- kzs WO to (ik-16‘ (T5 Cg �� .

C.,s24---er- k.4f>re6le...) , Tita., ,1 ,1244.t.eic_era4s. (`01,1, Ut.js4-e_A-r--- eir' ooc. agu ---4--€1---.. Tizgi--<- (6 j 5 CC ( k-e-l'z= ( itoostioer -g11.e3d` � �', � A-- C-1-1 t,i1c D1f&--a#ic key i LA) cam' ..S'
55 (Ve +4-0......, L)2- sLIEJ E._. ficoAl
iNnc.)�'e Q.c.) T0 J7J0) W c_. 2 (t k 1J-S 'Orls-- /ttltj-i
J 2..4-(o-nr (S re.e i - h Init. ( f "g_ /17c4c--ke--"Es
(:)) --rC)r,t,(t {"" /'\,
Deure.c.. -
City of Upland 460 North Euclid Avenue,Upland,CA 91786-4732 • (909)931-4100•Fax(909)931-4123 •TDD(900)735-2929•wwv�i Pcbgb\Pf 374

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-32 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-1
David Nasca
June 3, 2024
Response to Comment C-1-1
The commenter questions where the water for the proposed homes will come from, stating there is a water shortage and no state-wide plans to capture water for recharge.The commenter further states that solving the water shortage problem will solve the housing shortage problem and states his opposition to the project.

The Recirculated Draft EIR (see Appendix A-5, pp. 3-83 and 3-84) includes a discussion of water demand and supply indicating the City maintains sufficient water supplies for normal, dry, and multiple-dry years.The commenter's statements are noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.These comments do not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-33

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-34 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-2
From: AOL.COMMUNICATION
Sent: Friday,June 7, 2024 11:24 AM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Project
IYou don't often get email from [email protected] why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Dear Joshua,
We live in the Upland Hills Estates on Upland Hills Drive South. The proposed project will be across the fairway behind our home. We are opposed to this project. The C-2-1 noise and dust created by construction will destroy the peaceful serenity of our location.

Upland doesn't need the increased traffic and congestion this project will cause. They're C-2-2 really going to fit 65 single family homes in the flood control basin? We are going to have houses right on top of us. Our privacy will be compromised. Luckily we do have C-2-3 the fairway between our home and the basin, unless plans change, and they always seem to.

In conclusion, we are adamantly opposed to this project. We purchased here because of the peacefulness and openness of our backyard. We enjoy using our patio C-2-4 and being outside.

Hopefully this project will not be approved.

Thank you,
Max & Marti Schneider

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-36 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L S A APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-2
Max and Marti Schneider
June 7, 2024
Response to Comment C-2-1
The commenters state their opposition to the project, which is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-2-2
The commenters state the noise, dust, and increased traffic congestion will destroy the peace and serenity of the area.

Project impacts related to the generation of dust, noise, and traffic were addressed in Sections 4.2,

4.6, and 4.7 of the Recirculated Draft EIR, respectively. As established in the Recirculated Draft EIR, the generation of particulate matter during either construction or operation of the project would not exceed levels established for regional or localized emissions of pollutants, including particulate matter (see Tables 4.2C through 4.2.F). Furthermore, as with all projects in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin),the project would be required to comply with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) standard construction measures for the control of nuisance emissions and fugitive dust (e.g. SCAQMD Rule 402 and 403, respectively).

For noise,temporary noise impacts have been reduced to below a level of significance (see Recirculated Draft EIR,Table 4.6-H)through the implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-8.As stated in the Recirculated Draft EIR (pp.4.6-20 through 4.6-26), long-term operation-related noise levels of increases in noise levels would not exceed standards established at the nearest sensitive receptor and no significant impact would result from the occupation of the proposed uses.As stated by the commenters,the golf course fairway is between their residence and the project site, and no exceedance of noise levels established by the City would occur (see Tables

4.6.1 through 4.6.M).

Until July 1, 2020, roadway congestion or level of service (LOS)was used as the primary metric for planning and environmental review purposes in Upland. In accordance with Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), on August 10, 2020, the Upland City Council approved Resolution No. 6564 adopting "Vehicle Miles Traveled" Baseline and Thresholds of Significance and Guidelines for the purposes of analyzing transportation impacts under CEQA. Nonetheless,the Recirculated Draft EIR included an LOS analysis to confirm the project's consistency with City's General Plan LOS standard. As detailed in Table 4.7.A of the Recirculated Draft EIR, all intersections within the traffic study area would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during peak hours with the addition of project traffic, and conflict or inconsistency with General Plan LOS standards would occur.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-37

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
State CEQA Guidelines Section 15384 states that argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence which is clearly erroneous or inaccurate, or evidence of social or economic impacts that do not contribute to or are not caused by physical impacts on the environment do not constitute substantial evidence.State CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(c) further states that commenters should explain the basis for their comments and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments.The unsubstantiated comments raise only general issues of concern.The commenter's general statements and concerns are noted but do not constitute substantial evidence pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 and do not raise any specific issue related to the adequacy of the content or analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-2-3
The commenters question how the proposed development will fit on the project site and claim they will have houses "on top" of them, compromising their privacy.

A total of 9.16 acres of the project site would be developed with 65 single-family detached residential units for a residential density of 7.1 dwelling units per acre. Residential lots would range in size from 3,337 to 5,048 square feet. A comparative discussion of the scale of residential development is provided in Recirculated Draft EIR (see pp. 4.1-13 and 4.1-14). Regarding privacy of existing residences,this not a CEQA impact. Per Figure 4.2-1,the nearest residence in the Upland Hills Golf community is 144 feet from the project site.As stated by the commenter, a golf course fairway separates the project site from their residence.This unsubstantiated opinion does not raise any significant issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-2-4
The commenters restate their opposition to the project.The commenter's statements are noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required. 3-38 P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-3
Joshua Winter, Senior Planner
City of Upland RECEIVED
Development Services Dept.

Planning Division
460 N. Euclid Ave JUN 1 0 2024
Upland, CA 91786 CITY OF UPLAND
DEV.SERVICES DEPT.

Re:Villa Serena Specific Plan Project
Dear Mr. Winter,
As long-time residents of the Foothill Knolls neighborhood, we would like to voice our C-3-1 objection to the proposed development in the flood basin above 15th Street. 1) We are concerned about extra traffic in our neighborhood and on Campus Ave. C 3 2 2) We will inevitably enter another season of drought in the future and these residences C-3-3 will require water.Also,the development will cover areas of absorption for ground water. 3) We are concerned that wildlife in that basin will be destroyed during the construction C-3-4 process.
4) Upland High School is already over-crowded. Adding more homes will increase the C-3-5 need for a second high school which Upland has no plans to build.

Thank you for your consideration of these concerns,
Tom and Susan James
1456 Hildita Ct.

Upland, CA 91786

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-40 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-3
Tom and Susan James
June 10, 2024
Response to Comment C-3-1
The commenters state their opposition to the project, which is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-3-2
The commenters express concern about additional traffic in their neighborhood and on Campus Avenue.

Please refer to the response to Comment C-2-2. Also, the commenters reside in the neighborhood south of the proposed project. The proposed project is anticipated to generate a total of 614 two- way vehicle trips per day, with 46 a.m. peak-hour trips and 61 p.m. peak-hour trips.Vehicular access to the project site would be provided via two gated driveways from 15th Street,the primary ingress and egress driveway at the western boundary of the project site via the future new alignment of 15th Street from Coyote Run Drive to Campus Avenue, and an egress/emergency-vehicle-access-only gated driveway to 15th Street east of Coyote Run Drive East.As detailed in Figures 3.3 and 3.4 of the Recirculated Draft EIR, the 15th Street extension to Campus Avenue provides direct gated access from the proposed project site.The traffic knuckle planned for the intersection of 15th Street and Fernando Avenue will prevent through traffic to Campus Avenue from the existing segment of 15th Street,the adjacent neighborhood, or points further east(e.g., Grove Avenue.)As such, due to its less circuitous route, most of the project traffic will enter/exit the project from Campus Avenue, thereby minimizing travel through the commenter's neighborhood.

The traffic study addressed conditions at the following intersections: Campus Avenue at 14th 15tn and 16th Street, and Coyote Run Drive at East and West 15th Street.The additional traffic resulting from development and occupation of the proposed residences would not result in an unacceptable LOS during the a.m. peak hour and p.m. peak hour(see Table 4.7.A). Furthermore, as stated in the response to Comment C-2-2, traffic congestion is longer the metric for planning and environmental review of traffic impacts in Upland.

The commenter's general statements and concerns are noted but do not constitute substantial evidence pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064 and do not raise any specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-3-3
This comment states drought will inevitably occur again and that the proposed residences will require water and that the project will cover areas currently used for groundwater absorption.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-41

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
As stated in Section 4.5 of the Recirculated Draft EIR (pp.4.5-14 and 4.5-15),the 15th Street Basin has a total existing recharge volume of 280,870 cubic feet (or 6.45 acre-feet1).The proposed project would include modifications to the existing ponds within the 15th Street Basin.A summary of the post-developed groundwater recharge volumes is provided in Table 4.5.D of the Recirculated Draft EIR, demonstrating the modifications to the existing 15th Street Basin would result in an increase of on-site recharge from 6.45 acre-feet to 9.7 acre-feet, an increase of 3.25 acre-feet.Therefore,the proposed project would result in an increase in groundwater recharge potential compared to the existing condition. Considering this increase in recharge capacity, no significant impact was identified in the Recirculated Draft EIR.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-3-4
This comment expresses a non-specific concern regarding how wildlife in the basin will be affected during project construction.

The Recirculated Draft EIR (Section 4.3) provides a comprehensive assessment of the project's impacts on biological resources.State CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(c) states that commenters should explain the basis for their comments, and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments.

The general concern expressed by the commenter did not raise any specific substantiated issue related to the significance of environmental impacts or the adequacy of the Draft EIR.The comment does not raise any issues regarding the adequacy of the environmental analysis in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; and no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-3-5
This comment states Upland High School is already overcrowded, and that the project will increase the need for a second high school,which Upland has no plans to build.

As stated in the Recirculated Draft EIR (see Appendix A-5, pp. 3-71 and 3-73), California Government Code (Section 65995[b]) establishes the base amount of allowable developer fees imposed by school districts. Per the California Government Code, "The payment or satisfaction of a fee, charge, or other requirement levied or imposed ... are hereby deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts ... on the provision of adequate school facilities."The project will be required to pay these school impact fees in accordance with Government Code 65995 and Education Code 17620.Through payment of development fees in accordance with Government Code 65995 and Education Code 17620, impacts to school would be less than significant;therefore, no mitigation is required. 1 Acre-foot=325,851 gallons.
3-42 P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-43

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-44 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-4
From: Carol Borchers
Sent: Tuesday,June 11, 2024 3:55 PM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project IYou don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

I am strongly opposed to this project.

There are, as of this writing, 87 homes for sale within the city limits.Why does the city feel C-4-1 additional housing needs to be built?
Opening up 15th street to Campus will increase traffic flow from drivers using 15th street from Grove Ave to Campus Ave as a pass through, or shortcut,to avoid the intersection at C-4-2 Foothill Blvd and Campus Ave., This problem already exists on 14th street between Grove Ave and Campus Ave. Excess traffic and speeding are a very big concern already.The same will occur on 15th street.

There will be a negative impact on the current schools within the boundaries of this C-4-3 project.

There will be a negative impact to San Antonio Regional Hospital,which already struggles C-4-4 to support the current population, both within and outside of the city limits.

The City of Upland designates itself as the "City of Gracious Living". The continual building C-4-5 of new housing has caused a negative change to this city.

Carol Borchers
929 E Foothill Blvd. Spc 81
Upland, CA 91786

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-46 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-4
Carol Borchers
June 11, 2024
Response to Comment C-4-1
The commenter questions why additional housing is required to be built in Upland.This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-4-2
The commenter states that opening 15th Street to Campus Avenue will allow drivers to use 15th Street to avoid the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Campus Avenue, noting that traffic and speeding area already a big concern.

Based on previous public concern regarding traffic through the neighborhood south of the project site, primary access to the site was revised from that which was originally proposed.This access would be installed on 0.63 acre of unimproved land off site connecting the project site to the current terminus of East 15th Street through to Campus Avenue.Vehicular access to the project site would be provided to/from 15th Street at two locations. Primary (gated) access would be through the extension of 15th Street, which would allow residential entry from Campus Avenue, allowing vehicle traffic to avoid the neighborhood to the south.As detailed in Figures 3.3 and 3.4 of the Recirculated Draft EIR, the 15th Street extension to Campus Avenue provides direct gated access from the proposed project.The traffic knuckle planned for the intersection of 15th Street and Fernando Avenue will prevent through traffic to Campus Avenue from the existing segment of 15th Street,the adjacent neighborhood, or points farther east (e.g., Grove Avenue.)As such, due to its less circuitous route, the majority of project traffic will enter/exit the project from Campus Avenue; thereby minimizing travel through the commenter's neighborhood.

This comment does not raise a substantiated specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-4-3
This comment provides an unsubstantiated opinion the project would have an unspecified negative impact on local schools.

Please refer to the response to Comment C-3-5.This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-4-4
This comment provides an unsubstantiated opinion the project would have an unspecified negative impact on San Antonio Regional Hospital.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-47

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``\ UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
The demand for hospital services depends on a myriad of factors, which may include (but not necessarily limited to) actual need, preference, location, services provided, and urgency. It is speculative to determine if, when, and at what intensity future residents of the proposed project would require medical care.State CEQA Guidelines Section 15145 states that if a Lead Agency finds that a particular impact is too speculative for evaluation,this conclusion should be noted, and discussion of the impact should be terminated.As the commenter provides no substantiation to support their opinion,the City determines the evaluation of potential impacts to San Antonio Hospital would be speculative. As such,this comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-4-5
The commenter restates their opinion that development of the proposed project would cause a negative impact on Upland.This opinion is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.

This unsubstantiated opinion does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.
3-48 P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-5
From: David Coleman
Sent: Monday,June 24, 2024 10:34 AM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena
IYou don't often get email from [email protected] why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Hello Mr.Winter,
During the early days of information released there was an issue with the State of California stating that the area was restricted from use. Following that information the contractor burned off all vegetation and bulldozed the area. If there were any protected species in the area they would have C-5-1 been irradicated by the actions of the contractor. What are the positions of the City of Upland and the State of California on these issues today?
I live directly north of the area facing the twelfth fairway of the golf course. I also serve as President of the Upland Hills Estates Condominium Association which has 274 homes on the southside of Baseline Road.

I look forward to your response.

David Coleman
909-256-3224

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-50 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-5
David Coleman
June 24, 2024
Response to Comment C-5-1
The commenter states that vegetation in the basin had been previously removed and the area bulldozed by the contractor and questions the impacts of these activities on any protected species.

The commenter further questions what the current positions of the City and the State are on this these issues.

The project's impacts on biological resources have been comprehensively assessed in Section 4.3 of the Recirculated Draft EIR.The analysis contained in the Section 4.3 is supported by site-specific general biological resources surveys, protocol-level surveys for California gnatcatcher and San Bernardino kangaroo rat, nesting birds, and aquatic resources survey/delineation surveys conducted throughout 2022 and 2023 (see Section 4.3.1.2.)The impacts identified in the Recirculated Draft EIR and mitigation required to reduce the significance of these impact were substantially based on the technical reports (Recirculated Draft EIR, Appendices D1 through D4) and the Draft Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA)2 between the project applicant and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).The SAA establishes the impacts and measures to, "...avoid and minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources."
Mitigation Measures BIO-1 through BIO-6 address impacts to sensitive wildlife species, Mitigation Measure B10-7 requires submittal of evidence of compliance with provisions of the SAA prior to the initiation of ground disturbance, and Mitigation Measures BIO-8 and BIO-9 identify the mechanisms to create, monitor, enhance, and maintain resources in the existing"conservation area" at the eastern end of the basin or provide purchase of an area within a CDFW approved mitigation bank.

Based on the impacts and mitigation identified in Section 4.3 of the Recirculated Draft EIR, the City has determined that implementation of previously identified mitigation measures, developed in cooperation with the CDFW, would mitigate potential impacts to sensitive habitat and species that occur on the project site to a less than significant level.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required. 2 Streambed Alternation Agreement, EPMI-SBR-24938-R6, 15th Street Basin.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-51

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-52 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-6
From: Cindy
Sent: Wednesday,July 10, 2024 12:40 PM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Villa Serena Specific Plan Project IYou don't often get email from [email protected] why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Forwarded Conversation
Subject:Villa Serena Specific Plan Project
From: Cindy
Date: Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:32 PM
To:

Dear Mr. Winters,
I am emailing to express my deep concern for my
neighborhood if Upland approves the development of Villa Serena. I have read the proposal and I understand that the C-6-1 traffic study specifically on Grove, 14th Street and Campus Ave. will increase by 632 vehicles daily. I object to any entry or exit path on 15th St.

Please be aware of the additional changes to our C-6-2 neighborhood regarding the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Nicholson Strawberry Field.

>. A. ill T�
is 71a
� C-6-2
a �� , (cont)
F
m
- VICINITY MAP
Proleci Team
'T , n TE.TaE '' SITE
FOOTHILL AND GROVE MIXED USE ENGINEERING COVER SHEET A 1 Rancho Cucamonga CA L1�. 'J SOLUTIONS

FORE PROPERTY
As you can see Rancho is already setting grounds in the construction of Foothill and Grove to accommodate the
influx of traffic for this project. Please note, on this rendering, the vehicles parked on public streets (on Grove, back-in only) are positioned to go north. These are
parking areas for the commercial renters. It would be a C-6-3 difficult maneuver to exit south on Grove because the
Walmart shopping center also has an exit and southbound gets backed up. May I remind the Planning Commision,
this is Rancho's project not Upland. According to their study regarding this development, it will increase traffic by approximately boo vehicles. Together with Villa Serena's 632, this will impact this area negatively and affect the quality of life for our neighborhood and the City of Upland.

E 161h St E 161h St 16th St
Sunrize Ceriter 9
g
i 0
V} •
. '
;pa 9 2
E iso Si
Goicha Covered ofri
Rancho Cucamonga
i 8
tv
i Armando 512 Valle Vista
. .. .....
... ,., , Elementary School
Prepared Golf
.
ipland Meadows 8 - 1,. gt, o John
Dbile Home Park y qt :5, r 1.. San Ber
3,r6. E 1 31I,St a. ....‹
9 r Red Hill Courtin Club 9
LOS OLIVOS t
. 4 ,s
OGNInFANT TRAFFIC,tv
kik Upland Insurance
nd Member Seroces EX ITWNIG WALMART o'i'i '' I
immr...... ,,,d,ve„,„ ,ner . 9'tajH'IL c''''' Route 66 Trdilhead ci, Vince s Spaghetti
ephs el MeS0 C'!
z Z .

ItirCh y . z; =' Upland ei
7- 7 Memorial Park Z. m
Go gle ,. C-6-4
i 1 I 1 d,...,0
As you can see on this map (Villa Serena not labeled on 15th), this is the shortcut commuters use back and forth to reach the Colonies Shops, 210 freeway, or continue to the east. They avoid the intersection on Campus and Foothill because it is already a nightmare.

I have attached Rancho Cucamonga's mini-pack packet of
the project for you to view.

If you could clarify this rendering.

I. _ BIEMNPOEB
Nto
. LJ{ ieue;�L@f T 1 HR:Ull- 0: SI
p y `
ig
{. �. ,
e 5 FW��:_�__
in®
r Iik sMu y4 :cm:uror: Ey .. ppl_
R I L a' -'i 2 I LR➢R[i11F1m. •.L i � I� C c��y\
-1-=:;-"A I •` � LI�t�� e�of nrml %�.
- - - Iti..-:,=!!'hi-z-r!
,f. ,"%/-(a131-11
�fl
I 1 � /�\\ 1°1 r -i
1 /
F° FOOTHILL AND GROVE MIXED USE AO A2.0
FORE PROPFRtt - --
It appears to have an Exit/Entry point on Grove Ave. into the new development. If so, how is acceptable since this is a City of Rancho project and Grove is in Upland? (Error correction on map in yellow, please ignore.) C-6-5 I urge you to view the mini-packet, I urge you to travel Campus, 14th, and Grove daily before moving forward
with Villa Serena. We already have 1 gated community
exiting into this neighborhood (Red Hill) and now we are in jeopardy of adding 2 more. The City of Upland has
ignored our paved roads, trees, and sidewalks for years. I am able to bypass those things. I understand it is all about the budget and revenue. The 15th basin may be wildly C-6-6 overgrown but it is a tranquil spot in the neighborhood which lacks a park. (proposed when we bought our home but now a drydock).

The Villa's 65 2-story homes on 10 ft berm will affect some residences more than others. Our mountain view is just as C-6-7

important as those council members who boast their
C-6-7
mountain view on social media. (cont)
Take pride in our city and neighborhoods. Mine is not as pristine as others, but I know my neighbors, kids play in C_6_8 the streets, we borrow eggs from each other, we walk the dog.

From: Mail Delivery Subsystem
I
Message blocked
Your message to [email protected] has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.

The response from the remote server was:
550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. [SA2PEPF00002250.namprd09.prod.outlook.com 2024-07-10T19:32:25.987Z 08DC9DDE5ODEF353]
Forwarded message

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-58 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-6
Cindy Mastic
July 10, 2024
Response to Comment C-6-1
The commenters state their opposition to the project, which is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.The commenter further cites the daily vehicle traffic generated by the proposed project and objects to any entry or exit path on 15th Street.

As stated in the response to Comment C-3-2, primary ingress and egress driveway at the western boundary of the project site would be via the future new alignment of 15th Street from Coyote Run Drive to Campus Avenue.'The 15th Street connection to Campus Avenue was provided based on previous public concern regarding traffic through the neighborhood south of the project site. As detailed in Figures 3.3 and 3.4 of the Recirculated Draft EIR, the 15th Street extension to Campus Avenue provides direct gated access from the proposed project.The traffic knuckle planned for the intersection of 15th Street and Fernando Avenue will prevent through traffic to Campus Avenue from the existing segment of 15th Street, the adjacent neighborhood, or points farther east(e.g., Grove Avenue).As such, due to its less circuitous route,the majority of project traffic will enter/exit the project from Campus Avenue, thereby minimizing travel through the commenter's neighborhood.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-6-2
The commenter cites additional changes to their neighborhood resulting from the Strawberry Field development at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-6-3
The commenter cites specific concerns regarding development in Rancho Cucamonga that is planned at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. Notably, the commenter cites that the combined traffic from the proposed project and the project in Rancho Cucamonga would negatively impact their neighborhood and Upland.

As noted by the commenter, Rancho Cucamonga is the Lead Agency tasked with evaluating the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of development within its jurisdiction.As such,the traffic impacts referenced by the commenter would be properly evaluated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.The City of Upland did not require the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue to be addressed in the project-specific traffic study, because the proposed project would not contribute 50 or more peak hour trips at that intersection. The Traffic Impact Analysis 3 An egress/emergency vehicle access only gated driveway to 15th Street east of Coyote Run Drive East.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-59

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``\ UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
(Recirculated Draft EIR, Appendix G-1) states, "The 5 study area intersections shown ... were selected for evaluation in this TA based on consultation with City of Upland staff. At a minimum,the study area includes intersections where the Project is predicted to contribute 50 or more peak hour trips per the City's Guidelines."As stated in the response to Comment C-3-2, all intersections within the traffic study area would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS during peak hours with the addition of project traffic and no conflict or inconsistency with General Plan LOS standards would occur.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-6-4
The commenter claims that traffic will use 15th Street as a shortcut to avoid the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Campus Avenue.The commenter further provided in its entirety,the staff packet from the June 12, 2024 meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission for the referenced project.

As stated in the response to Comment C-6-1, the traffic knuckle at Fernando Avenue would prevent through access to Campus Avenue from 15th Street, negating the use of 15th Street as a shortcut for current traffic or traffic from the project in Rancho Cucamonga.The staff packet (provided at https://rcdocs.cityofrc.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=2000919&dbid=0&repo=RanchoCucamonga) is noted.This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-6-5
This comment questions the locations and control of the access points for the project in Rancho Cucamonga; the condition of daily traffic on Campus Avenue, 14th Street, and Grove Avenue; and presence of existing and future gated communities.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-6-6
This comment states the City of Upland has ignored the condition of pavement,trees, and sidewalks; and comments that, although the 15th Street Basin may be wildly overgrown, it is a tranquil spot in the neighborhood that lacks a park.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required. 3-60 P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L C A APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA J
Response to Comment C-6-7
The commenter states the development of two-story homes will affect some residences more than others and claims views to the mountain are as important to neighborhood residents as they are to local elected officials.

The current top of the berm is at approximately 1,430 feet above mean sea level (amsl). Per the grading plan, the pads of the proposed residential structures would be at 1,429 feet amsl.

Current views north from Fernando Avenue to the project site are provided in the photograph below.As shown,the proposed project site is visible in the foreground with the San Gabriel Mountains offering background views. Under the current condition,golf course landscaping partially blocks views of the lower slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains. ,3 +rFE Y f16 f a
'4' - , it �'" -,:
`^1` ,w A tt: ..'•7-, kP-,e.4.v,,.4-.,.'k,--.-;24.74 jy, -� o .r.�• ; }. , i vac , a;�n b , Y fi
,, f . [ STOP
Post-development,views north to the San Gabriel Mountains will include the proposed two-story homes, enhanced streetscape, and project landscaping in the foreground (see simulation on the next page). As shown,the height of the proposed two-story residences is approximate to the height of the existing current golf course landscaping that blocks views of the lower slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains.Views of the prominent ridgelines of the mountains are maintained.

PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-61

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J�\ UPLAND, CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
'1:1 1 ii*
=..
41 1
—
When viewed north from 13th Avenue (see photo below),the lower slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains are partially obstructed by on-site vegetation and golf course landscaping. 31, •.: ' - .• ,,- .;,- A,
n t.SyY Xy�p. ", 11 k l
•
4,C , , .,
`\'ten A S' y ��y^ i •l. i Al 4�.�,� T .qr \ g •�att,pt!,w h ` t fib` f I'll. • -vr)i i'! .�' �Rr - + -i� r,' + 1'•• Post-development,views north to the San Gabriel Mountains will include the proposed two-story homes, enhanced streetscape, and project landscaping in the foreground (see simulation below). As shown,the height of the proposed two-story residences is approximate to the height of the existing golf course landscaping.Views of the prominent ridgelines of the mountains are maintained. 3-62 P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L S A APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
z 1

7.Y` 1 _ � .
1 iir
; iI ^5
H'
T
e 1
Win=.

By their nature, any view, whether of a typical neighborhood or the San Gabriel Mountains, will vary depending on the location of viewer.The California Court of Appeals concluded in its Mira Mar Mobile Community v. Oceanside decision that potential impacts related to views from private lands are not considered impacts under CEQA unless the lead agency has specifically adopted a standard or policy relevant to the project site specifically protecting a private landowner's views.The City of Upland, as the CEQA lead agency for the proposed project, has not adopted any such policy or standard.

The current partially obstructed views of the San Gabriel Mountains are described in Section 4.1.1.5 of the Recirculated Draft EIR.The post-development condition of these same views from publicly accessible streets is provided in Section 4.1.2.2 of the Recirculated Draft EIR (pgs. 4.1-12 and 4.1-14).

As stated in the Recirculated Draft EIR:
...while the proposed project would slightly obscure lower views of the San Gabriel Mountains and Mt. Baldy, the ridgeline and most prominent views(i.e., higher views that extend above the existing mature trees) would continue to be visible with implementation of the proposed project.

The commenter's non-specific comment is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-6-8
The commenter asks that the City to take pride in Upland and its neighborhoods.

This comment is noted but does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-63

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-64 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-7
From: Robyn&Nathan Tan
Sent: Thursday,July 11, 2024 9:54 AM
To: Joshua Winter
Cc: ICE Robyn Michler Tan
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project IYou don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

To whom it may concern,
As a resident who will be directly impacted by this development which will be adjacent to the north boundary of my property, I am concerned that there is no clear description of the provisions to provide privacy and security for those of us who will suddenly find themselves with a new development and public bike path behind their property.We bought C-7-1 this home in part because of the privacy, quiet and views provided by not having anyone behind us. Now, not only will we have to endure additional neighborhood traffic, noise and obscured views, we will also have random people cycling or walking behind our yard which at this time affords almost complete privacy and serenity.

Please advise if there is a provision to remediate this issue (i.e the builder will construct a sufficiently high wall-7'-to ensure privacy or provide compensation to impacted C-7-2 homeowners for their own construction costs). Otherwise, please add it to the concerns that need to be addressed as part of the EIR and project approval.

Regards,
Robyn and Nathan Tan
Sent from my iPhone

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-66 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-7
Robyn and Nathan Tan
July 11, 2024
Response to Comment C-7-1
The commenters express concern that there is no clear description of the provisions to provide security and privacy to residents living adjacent to the project site.The commenters raise questions regarding the increased noise from public use (cycling and bicycling)within the project site and the changed character of views from their property.

As detailed in the Recirculated Draft EIR, and the responses to Comments C-2-2, C-3-2 and C-6-7, impacts related to noise,traffic, and visual impacts have been determined to be less than significant (traffic and visual impacts) or less than significant with the incorporation of mitigation (noise). Per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15131(a), "Economic or social effects of a project shall not be treated as significant effects on the environment...The focus on the analysis [in the EIR] shall be on the physical changes." As such,the commenters' issues related to the privacy, or the serenity of their residence are not relevant for purposes of CEQA analysis.

This comment does not raise a substantiated, specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-7-2
The commenters suggest preferred options to ensure the continued privacy of existing, adjacent residences.

The commenters' concerns are noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.As stated previously, residential privacy is not an issue addressed under CEQA. This comment does not raise a specific or substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-67

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-68 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-8
From: Natasha Walton
Sent: Thursday,July 11, 2024 5:59 PM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project IYou don't often get email from [email protected] why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Dear Mr. Winter:

I am an advocate for open green spaces and wildlife in our Upland community.

I ask that the developer for the Villa Serena Specific Plan project adopt an alternative project—the donation of the 15th Street flood basin property to a non-profit conservation organization, such as the Wildlands Conservancy,to preserve this open space,wildlife habitat, and flood control basin in perpetuity. Non-profit organizations, like the Wildlands Conservancy create preserves that are open to the public and include outdoor education programs for public schools (please visit their website for more information).

C-8-1
Such a preservation project would be a win-win situation for the entire Upland community! The land owner of proposed project site would have a nice tax write off, and the basin would continue to provide local flood control and become a preserve that would protect the native habitat and wildlife that reside there in perpetuity. In addition the site could remain accessible to the public and become a site of an outdoor education programs for students, like those at Foothill Knolls STEM Academy of Innovation.

I have hope that the city staff, planning commission, and city council will realize that this project site must be preserved for flood control and as a special place for our native wildlife and plants, and,yes, C-8-2 even our hearts.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Natasha Walton, MS
20-Year Upland Resident

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-70 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L S A APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-8
Natasha Walton
July 11, 2024
Response to Comment C-8-1
The commenter requests that the developer and the City adopt an alternative to the project,the donation of the project site to a non-profit conservation organization to preserve the project site in perpetuity for open space, wildlife habitat, and flood-control purposes.

The Recirculated Draft EIR (Section 6.1) provides an assessment of the "No Project" alternative, described as follows:

The No Project alternative assumes that the proposed project would not be developed and that the project site would generally remain in its current condition. The project site would continue to be undeveloped. Infrastructure improvements within and adjacent to the project site, include the extension of 15th Street, would not occur.

Per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, an EIR must"describe a reasonable range of alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which could feasibly attain most of the project's basic objectives, while avoiding or substantially reducing the project's significant environmental impacts."The range of alternatives required in an EIR is governed by a "rule of reason"that requires the EIR to set forth only those alternatives necessary to permit a reasoned choice.The commenter's suggested alternative, donation of the site and preservation in perpetuity in its current state, is synonymous to the "No Project" alternative, which fails to achieve any of the project's objectives detailed in Section 3.4 of the Recirculated Draft EIR.

As the Recirculated Draft EIR provides an alternative assessment to maintain the site in its current condition and because this comment does not raise a substantiated, specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-8-2
The commenter expresses hope that the site be preserved in its special state.This comment is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.This comment does not raise a substantiated, specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-71

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-72 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-9
From: Cathy Cushman
Sent: Friday,August 23, 2024 3:51 PM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan Project IYou don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

I vote a big fat NO on this project. The following are my reasons: C-9-1

1. In 1977 I lived on a street below 15th near Monte Verde St. I would hate to have the traffic from this new development going down Monte Verde. I would think the residents on C-9-2 Alta Avenue and Fernando Avenue would be upset too with the increased traffic going down their quiet neighborhood street.

2. Now I live on the SW corner of Fernbrook and 16th Street. The traffic is so bad in the afternoon, the traffic backs up to 2nd Avenue. I often have to take 15th street east to get to Campus and then turn left to reach 16th. Now Campus is backed up to 15th because people have discovered that route. C-9-3
Now you want to open 15th St. to 65 new houses which might mean 130 more drivers dumping into Campus at 15th?? And speaking of Campus, I have called the city and told them that Campus needs to be repaved from Foothill to Arrow. It also has potholes between 16th and Foothill. I know our city is not rich, and we do not have a lot of money to fix things, so why do we want to add more drivers to our city streets?

3.The 2nd reason deals with the flood control basin. It is there for a reason and has been there for years. Why would you want to build 65 houses on it? I read the comments from C-9-4 the people who are very knowledgeable about what lives in that basin and based on their views, I think it is important to keep the wildlife area.

4. If I lived on 15th Street or Red Hill, I would be very angry if the new project blocked my C-9-5 views of the mountains.

5. And finally there is the water and electricity matter. Our state is trying to cut all of that. I read that CA has to import 60% of our electricity. And we know how water goes- even C-9-6 though houses use less than 5% of the state's water, the gov't is always trying to threaten us with less. Until our state gets serious about real energy and not stupid solar and wind, I don't want to cut my carefully controlled use because of 65 new housing units.

Though my stance may sound like NIMBY, it's more about quality of life. We watched the Colonies absorb all the open land which I believe was done nicely. Can we please just C-9-7 conserve the 9 acres for open space?
Thank you. Cathy Cushman

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-9
Cathy Cushman
August 23, 2024
Response to Comment C-9-1
The commenter expresses opposition to the project.

This comment is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.

This comment does not raise a substantiated, specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-9-2
The commenter states residents will be "upset" by increased traffic and noise on local streets.

Please refer to the response to Comments C-2-2 and C-3-2 regarding noise and traffic impacts that result from development of the proposed project.This comment does not raise a specific, substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-9-3
The commenter states current traffic conditions on Campus Avenue and other local roadways are bad and "dumping" the project traffic onto Campus Avenue will worsen conditions.The commenter further questioned the condition of the existing pavement on Campus Avenue.

This comment does not raise a specific, substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-9-4
The commenter questions the purpose of converting the project site to residential uses and expresses the opinion the "wildlife area" be retained.

As detailed in Section 3.1 of the Recirculated Draft EIR:

The project site encompasses the existing, 20.3-acre 15th Street control detention basin (basin)located south of the Upland Hills Country Club in the central-eastern portion of Upland in San Bernardino County, California... The City of Upland(City)has determined the western portion of the basin is a surplus parcel. The proposed residential uses would be developed on this 9.16-acre surplus parcel. The remaining portion of the basin is adequate for continued flood control operations pursuant to the completion of basin modifications that are a component of this project.

The commenter's opinion is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.This comment does not raise a specific, substantiated issue related to the adequacy of P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-75

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``\ UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-9-5
This comment expresses an opinion regarding changes in views of the San Gabriel Mountains.

Please refer to the response to Comment C-6-7.This comment is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.This comment does not raise a specific, substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-9-6
The comment expresses an unsubstantiated, non-specific opinion regarding electricity and water usage and the State's policy regarding said resources.

This comment does not raise a specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-9-7
The commenter expresses an opinion regarding conservation of the project site as open space.

This comment is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.

This comment does not raise a specific, substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies;therefore, no further response is required.
3-76 P:\T-Z\TCI2201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-10
From: Stephen Wulkopf
To: Joshua Winter
Cc: Stephen Wulkopf
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Villa Serena Specific Plan Project Date: Wednesday,September 4,2024 9:29:20 AM
[You don't often get email from [email protected] why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification
WARNING:External email.Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Mr.Winter,
On behalf of the Home Owner's Association Board at Mountain View(the neighborhood to the direct west of the C-10-1 project),I am writing to formally state our opposition to the project. Wild life in the area already has limited space and this project and the construction will force more animals into our community park. The coyotes are specifically C-10-2 a concern as we have many small children and pets that play in our neighborhood park. Additionally,we have C-10 3 concerns about the additional traffic coming through the extended corridor of 15th. Assuming the project moves forward despite any public dissent,we would at least like fewer homes to be built(smaller footprint,less cars). C-10-4 Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Kind regards,
Stephen Wulkopf
HOA Board President
MountainView in Upland

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-78 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-10
Stephen Wulkopf
September 4, 2024
Response to Comment C-10-1
The commenter expresses opposition to the project.

This comment is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.

This comment does not raise a substantiated, specific issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-10-2
The commenter provides a general statement that project construction will force more animals, including coyotes,from the site into local parks which may prove harmful to small children and pets.

As identified in the Recirculated Draft EIR (see pp. 4.3-33 and 4.3-34),the project site is currently surrounded on all sides by urban/suburban development, and golf course landscapes with little to no areas that may provide connectivity to other habitat, if any, in the region.The project site is not within any identified Essential Habitat Connectivity areas or Natural Landscape Blocks.As further stated in Section 3.1 of the Recirculated Draft EIR, only the eastern 9.16 acres of the basin will be developed with residences.The remaining portions of the basin, 6.85-acre area directly east of the residential development will be modified and maintained for stormwater and flood control capacity, and a 4.29-acre area at the extreme eastern boundary of the basin (the "conservation area")would remain unaffected by project activities. Similar to the existing condition,these areas would be available for wildlife use.

This comment does not raise a specific or substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-10-3
The commenter states that neighborhood will experience additional traffic through the extension of 15th Street.

Please refer to the response to Comment C-3-2, which describes the configuration of the 15th Street extension, which limits access to project residents only.This comment does not raise a specific or substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

Response to Comment C-10-4
This comment recommends the project move forward with fewer residences built on-site.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-79

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J``` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
As stated in the Section 6.2 of the Recirculated Draft EIR,the City considered a "Reduced Density/Conservation" alternative assuming the project site would still be developed with single- family residential uses, similar to the proposed project, but that only approximately 45 units would be developed on the site.This alternative would achieve the objectives of the proposed project, although not to the same extent as the proposed project.

The commenter's development preference is noted and will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.This comment does not raise a specific or substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.
3-80 P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-11
December 11, 2024
Joshua Winter, Senior Planner
City of Upland
Development Services Department
Planning Division
460 N. Euclid Ave.

Upland, CA 91786
[email protected]
RE:Villa Serene Specific Plan Project-Resident Pedestrian Access Dear Mr.Winter,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the Villa Serena project on East 15th Street.As a nearby resident, I would like to address the proposed extension of 15th Street from Campus Avenue to the site.

The city owns the property necessary for this extension, and while I support its development, I believe it is important to ensure that the use of this property benefits not only the developer and future residents but also the current residents of the area.

Currently,there is no pedestrian access between 15th Street and Campus Avenue.To reach Campus Avenue for exercise, or to access local parks and businesses, residents must walk all the way down to 14th Street and then back up Campus Avenue, adding roughly 1.89 miles to the round- trip journey(see Exhibit A). Providing a pedestrian connection between East 15th Street and C-11-1 Campus Avenue would significantly improve the walkability of our neighborhood and offer a direct route to local amenities, benefiting residents and businesses alike.

With support from my neighbors, I respectfully request that a public pedestrian access be created from East 15th Street to Campus Avenue (see Exhibit B).

I would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this matter further and work towards a solution that benefits all parties involved—the neighbors,the developer, and the City of Upland. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience.

Thank you for your attention to this request.

Sincerely,
Dennis Ferncez
Cell: 714-604-9748
[email protected]

ExhibitA
r @

Exhibit B
Old•
TDay SPF� rvii=R a-a ' 0- y -'�'Lr
•
' I °wltam'u11,ew,HQA ,Sawoothrpr-' tIrTif.r. L ;i• 3 lk.,... '.- --- a itiOsal" .0 irlr.Jr:1M
--
rtcit - t _
- #,T'' i ft If If -3 '
N..f ,,,k, • - i
,r 2- _ u Proposed Pedestrian Access : 1 4 it, . , ... .,,....
•
Ili
,.. ,.... .. ... . .
f % � ; �! ' ` frt::_ •y _ter•, . .04,--.••.-?, ,.,rantafn , • ... .. 1.- t... it

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-84 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT L SA APRIL 2025 UPLAND,CALIFORNIA
Response to Comment C-11
Dennis Ferncez
December 11, 2024
Response to Comment C-11-1
The commenter states that the City owns the property planned for the 15th Street extension and that pedestrian access from the existing section of 15th Street through the proposed 15th Street extension to Campus Avenue be provided for current residents of the neighborhood.The commenter further states that providing public access through the 15th Street extension to Campus Avenue would significantly improve the walkability of the existing neighborhood, As detailed in Figure 3.6 of the Recirculated Draft EIR, pedestrian access is provided from the existing segment of 15th Street,through the pocket park to be developed north of Fernando Avenue and the proposed extension of 15th Street to Campus Avenue.The commenter's preference for public complete public access to the planned sidewalk along the 15th Street extension through to Campus Avenue will be considered by the City prior to any future action on the project.This comment does not raise a specific or substantiated issue related to the adequacy of the analysis contained in the Draft EIR, Recirculated Draft EIR, or supporting studies; therefore, no further response is required.

P:\T-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25) 3-85

LC A VILLA SERENA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT J`(` UPLAND,CALIFORNIA APRIL 2025
This page intentionally left blank
3-86 PAT-Z\TC12201 Villa Serena\03 Focused EIR\Final EIR\Final EIR\3.0 Responses FEIR.docx(04/01/25)

Comment C-12
From: Darrell James Maxey
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2024 1:03 PM
To: Joshua Winter
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Villa Serena Specific Plan
IYou don't often get email from [email protected] why this is important WARNING: External email. Please verify sender before opening attachments or clicking on links.

Good afternoon
My name is Darrell Maxey and I live at 1310 Upland Hills Dr S, Upland, CA 91786,which is 300 feet north of the proposed Villa Serena Development. I have lived at this address since 2015, am very familiar with the site or the proposed development. I am a retired Civil Engineer. There is a record of my comments on the June 8, 2020 scoring meeting.

I reviewed the documents in the Draft Environmental Document for the Initial Study and the more recent revised or amended documents.

My comments are as follows:

1.The proposed residential development will remove about 1/2 or 9.2 acres or the 20 existing 20 acre 15th St flood basin. Modifications will be made to the remaining 11.1 acres to mitigate the loss of the flood basin. The basis for this decision is a 2017 Basin Modification study by Madole and Associates.The drainage and hydraulic study may be out of date given changes due to Climate change and major swings in precipitation and flood events occurring in California, Southern California and elsewhere. Significantly, reducing the capacity and function of a working flood detention basin could be a mistake C-12-1 that man will regret. During recent "wet year" precipitation events in the fall/winter of 2022/23 and 2023/24 the basin had much higher water levels than the 2010-2022 drought years and these events did not approach 100+year events.. At the very least, a new independent hydraulic and flood study should be conducted which would incorporate more updated projections of precipitation and flood events.The Villa Serena development is not in the best interests of the City and its residences and will have long term potentially unavoidable impacts to flooding as proposed.

2.The Traffic Impact in Appendix H analysis appears to be flawed. The traffic impact analysis based on 2022 observations (when traffic was light partially due to residual covid work from home and school restrictions) shows level of service (LOS) is A(good) at the intersection of 15th and Campus for PM peak. I drive through this intersection of 15th and Campus several days a week at 4:30 - 6:30 pm and the LOS northbound on Campus is C-12-2 more likely D or E (poor). It often takes 3 or 4 traffic cycles to move north from 15th St. to Baseline (16th Street) and the intersection at Campus and 15th is sometimes blocked. The Villa Serena single home multiple car residential development which proposes to connect