Upland City Council
September 8, 2025

employees, or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.
(4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended,voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty(30)days'prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City.
e. cceotability_of Insorprs. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.

Best's rating of no less than A: VIII and admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verifioation of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause.The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete,certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements effecting the coverage required by these specifications.

11.IMEPENDENT CON_IRACTOR,
a.Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor.

The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees, or agents of the City. Contractor shalt not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City, City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. c. PERS Eligibility Indemnification: In the event that Contractor or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Contractor providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Contractor or its employees, agents, or

subcontractors,as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.
d. Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Contractor and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enrollin PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

11.LEGAL RE$PONSIBILITIES.

The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws, and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. Contractor is responsible for compliance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010), and City shall not be obligated to provide any health care coverage to Contractor. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws, and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section.

12. RELEASE OFJNFORM TlON.,
a, All information gained by Contractor in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Contractor without City's prior written authorization.

Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered"voluntary" provided Contractor gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Contractor shall promptly notify City should Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories,request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Contractor andlorbe present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Contractor agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Contractor. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response.

12.NOTICES.

Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,Federal Express,that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be

effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail asprovided above.

To City: City of Upland To Contractor:Hardy & Harper Inc, Mailing Address: 460 N. Euclid Ave 31 Rancho Circle Upland, CA 91786 Lake Forest, CA 92630
Attention: City Manager Attention: Ashlie Blanchard

13.ASSIGNMENT.

The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder,without prior written consent of the City. Upon terminationof this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Counciland the Contractor

14.LICENSES.

At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 15,GOVERNING.,LAW.

The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties, and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place In the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Upland.ln the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement,the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.

16.PROHIBITED 1NTERB$T,
No officer, or employee of the City of Upland shall have any financial interest,direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof. the Contractor, or Contractor's sub-contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Upland has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial, or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub-contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.

17.ENTIRE A G REEMENT,
This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. Ail prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations, and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.

18.AVIMBILY TO EXECUTE THIS AgREEMENT,

The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.

19.SEVERABUTY,
If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unenforceable in any circumstance, such determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any other circumstance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the value of this Agreement, based upon the substantial benefit of the bargain for any party,is materially impaired, which determination made by the presiding court or
arbitrator of competent jurisdiction shall be binding,then both parties agree to substitute such provision(s)through good faith negotiations.

20.WAIVER,
The delay or failure of either party at any time to require performance or compliance by the other of any of its obligations or agreements shall in no way be deemed a waiver of those rights to require such performance or compliance. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized representative of the party against whom enforcement of a waiver is sought. The waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any occurrence or eventshall not be deemed a waiver of any right or remedy in respect to any other occurrence or event, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver

21.CONSTRUCTION.

The parties have participated jointly in the negotiation and drafting of this Agreement. In the event an ambiguity or question of intent or interpretation arises with respect to this Agreement, this Agreement shall be construed as if drafted jointly by the parties and in accordance with its fair meaning; There shall be no presumption or burden of proof favoring or disfavoring any party by virtue of the authorship of any of the provisions of this Agreement.

22.COSTS.

Each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in the preparation andnegotiation of this Agreement and in the performance of Its obligations hereunder except as expressly provided herein

23.RE1PSQNSIBILITy FOR ERRORS.

Contractor shall be responsible for its work and results under this Agreement. Contractor, when requested, shall furnish clarification and/or explanation as may be required by the City's representative, regarding any services rendered under this Agreement at no additional cost to City. In the event that an error or omission attributable to Contractor occurs, then Contractor shall, at no cost to City, provide all necessary design drawings,

estimates and other Contractor professional services necessary to rectify and correct the matter to the sole satisfaction of City and to participate in any meeting required with regard to the correction.

24.AtTORNEYS' 'EES.

In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions, or provisions hereof.
(signatures on following page)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the dayand year first above written.

CITY OF UPLAND
/47' AZ
.. Stephen Parker,Acting City Manager
Attest:

Keri Johnson, City.(",,;s,rjl{
Approved As to Form:

Stephen Deitsch,City Attorney

CONTRACTOR
Hardy&Harper Inc., 32 Rancho Circle, Lake Forest, CA 92630(714-444-1851) / By:

Name: Michael rurrA',
,
Title: Vice President
i
By: k - .

Name: Kristen Paulino
Corporate Secretary
Title:
1

1 EXHIBIT 'A'

FEE SCHEDULE
On-Call Asphalt Repair—Standard Pricing
(Includes all Labor.Equipment, Materials&Disposal Costs) Equipment Breakdown(wlo Labor) Daily Rate
Flat Bed Truck wl Compressor Mount $330,00r
Bob-Tail Truck 0-11 Yards $320.00
Concrete Flat Bed Truck $300.00
Dump Truck 9-11 Yards $350.00
Air Compressor $160.00
Water Truck $320.00
Skip Loader(incl trailer) $350.00
Flat Bed Truck wl 3-5 ton roller combo $670.00
Dump Truck w/Skip Loader&Trailer combo $700.00
10-12 Ton Roller(incl trailer) $620.00
3-5 Ton Roller(Intl trailer) $370.00
Berm Machine(min,charge) $1,500.00
Bobcat w/bucket $250.00
Bobcat wl grinder $310.00
Materials Unit Cost
Asphalt(D-2 Mix) Ton $95.00
Asphalt(C-2 Mix) Ton gad
-
Asphalt Plant Opening on Saturday $i,000.Od
Class II Rock Base C.Y. $25.00
CMB Rock Base C.Y. $15.©0
Tack Material S.Y. $1.00
Concrete(3- 10 C.Y.) C.Y. $180.00
Short Load Charge (less than 3 C.Y.) $500.00

EXHIBIT 'A'

FEE SCHEDULE
On-Call Asphalt Repair-Standard Pricing
(includes all Labor,Equipment,Materials&Disposal Costs) Asphalt 4"thick-Remove and Replace Unit Unit Price (includes sawcut)
1 0-500 4 S.F. $14.50
2 501 -2,000 S.F. $10.00
3 2,001 —5,000 S.F. $7.00
4 5,001 -15,000 S.F. $4.50 --
5 15,001 —30,000 S.F. $3.50
Asphalt 6"thick-Remove and Replace 1 Unit I Unit Price I (Includes saw-cut)
1 0-500 S.F. $18.00 ___
2 1 501 —2,000 S.F. $12.75
3 2,001 —5,000 S.F. $9.25
4 15,001 -15,000 S.F._ $5.75
5 15,001 —30,000 S.F. $4.75
6"Asphalt Berm-Machine ' Unit Unit Price
1 0—500 L.F. $1 ,50
2 501 —1,000 ' L.F. $9. 0
18"Asphalt Berm-Machine Unit Unit Price
1 I—500 L.F. $12.00
2 1501 —1,000 L.F. $11.00
' "T-Cut"Asphalt Grinding-0.12'Depth ! Unit Unit Price yid 0.12'AC Overlay I
f__
1 I 0—500 S.F. $9.50
2 I 501 —2,500 S.F. $4.50
3 12,501 —5,000 S.F. $3.25

EXHIBIT 'A'

FEE SCHEDULE
On-Call Asphalt Repair--Standard Pricing
(includes all Labor, Equipment,Materials& Disposal Costs) Striping(Two Coats Paint Unit Unit Price
1 4-inch White Stripe . L.F. $1.15
2 6-inch White Stripe L.F. ` $1.45
3 8-inch White Stripe L.F. $1.75
4 4-Inch Yellow Stripe I L.F. $1.15
5 4-inch Double Yellow Stripe L.F. $2.30
•
I Striping
P g(Thermoplastic) � Unit I Unit Price
1 12-inch White Cross-Walk � S.F. -$5:75 2 12-inch Yellow Cross-Walk S.F. $5.75
3 12-inch White Stop Bar I S.F. $5.75
Slurry Seal-Type 1 I Unit Unit Price
7 0—1,000 S.F. $5.15
2 1,001-5,000 S.F. $2.85
3 5,001 -10,000 S.F. $1.45
4 10,001 +S.F. S.F. $0.65
Slurry Seal-Type 2 Unit Unit Price
1 0-1,000 S,F.
2 1,001-5,000 S.F. $2.90
3 5,001-10,000 S.F. $1.50
4 10,001 +S.F. S.F. $0.75

EXHIBIT 'A'
FEE.SCHEDULE
On-Call Asphalt Repair—Standard Pricing
(includes all Labor, Equipment, Materials&Disposal Costs) Equipment Breakdown(w/o Labor) I Daily Rate
Flat Bed Truck w/Compressor Mount $330.00
Bob-Tail Truck 9.11 Yards $320.00
Concrete Flat Bed Truck $300.00
Dump Truck 9-11 Yards $350.00
Air Compressor $160.00
Water Truck $320.00
Skip Loader(inci trailer) $350.00
Flat Bed Truck w/3.5 ton roller combo $670.00
Dump Truck w/Skip Loader&Trailer combo I $700,00
10-12 Ton Roller(inci trailer) $620.00
3-5 Ton Roller(inci trailer) $370.00
Berm Machine(min.charge) $1,500.00
Bobcat wi bucket $250.00
Bobcat wl grinder $310.00
Materials Unit Cost
Asphalt(D-2 Mix) Ton $95.00
Asphalt(C-2 Mix) Ton $90.00
Asphalt Plant Opening on Saturday $1,000.00
Class II Rock Base C.Y. $25.00
CMB Rock Base C.Y. $15.00
Tack Material S.Y. $1.00
Concrete(3- 10 C.Y.) C.Y $180,00
Short Load Charge(less than 3 C.Y.) $500.00

4 o apt

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
o9Ll
California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits City Officers from participating in any action concerning a license, permit,other entitlement for use,franchise, or contract(collectively"license, permit,or contract")if they receive political contribution(s)from a party, or its agent(s), totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months before the proceeding, while a proceeding is pending, and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Upland City Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding and recuse themselves before the proceeding unless the violation has been properly cured.

Current Upland City Council Members are listed at:
https://www.upla ndca,gov/city-council-treasurer
Parties and their Agents are responsible for accessing the link to review the names and disclosing their applicable contributions to City Officers on the record of a proceeding.

As a party to a proceeding,you are also required to provide information below about contributions made by you, your agents on behalf of you or your organization, your organization subject to the proceeding with the City, and any organization you direct or control pursuant to the aggregation rules at FPPC Reg. § 18438.5, except for uncompensated officers of a nonprofit organization. This form is to be submitted to the City of Upland and is a public record. If you have any questions about this form, please contact your City representative for assistance.

1. Have you or your company,or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/entity,made any political contributions of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application,or the anticipated date of any Council action?
YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):

NO

2. Do you or your company/entity, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months following any Council action related to your proposal or application? AYES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):
tfNO
Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the Upland City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action. It does, however, preclude the identified Council Member(s)from participating in any actions related to your proposal or application.

Date Signature of authorized individual
Company/Apo ii cant Name t/s e(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)

, °v °p`q� cITFUP LAND
oid "The City of Gracious Living"
DATE: September 8,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:DAMIEN R.ARRULA,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

LIZ RODRIGUEZ,MANAGEMENT ANALYST
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH KOSMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES

FOR ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT ADVISORY SERVICES RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council Approve an agreement with Kosmont Transactions Services, Inc. dba Kosmont Financial Services for Financing District Advisory services in the amount of$47,500.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action supports the City's goal of exploring financing tools that will help fund infrastructure improvements and economic development opportunities, with a focus on the Downtown Upland parking structure, Foothill Blvd Sewer Main and other priority sites.

BACKGROUND
Staff has identified a need to evaluate long-term funding strategies for infrastructure and redevelopment projects.One option available under State law is the formation of a tax increment financing district, such as an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District(EIFD).

In response to the elimination of redevelopment agencies, California Senate Bill 628 effective January 1, 2015, and California Assembly Bill 313 effective January 1,2016,authorized public agencies the ability to form EIFDs,which are public financing instruments designed to succeed former Redevelopment Agency financing mechanisms and provide more flexibility than Infrastructure Financing Districts (IFDs). An EIFD is a governmental entity, separate and distinct from a city or county that establishes it and is governed by a Public Financing Authority(PFA).

EIFDs can aid local government entities in funding public capital facilities, or other specified projects of communitywide significance,primarily by capturing tax increment(TI)revenue generated within the district. EIFDs provide an opportunity for agencies to issue bonds for an array of public infrastructure projects, such as a parking structure in the Downtown, a new Sewer Main along West Foothill Blvd., and other economic development efforts within specific areas.

Kosmont Financial Services (KFS), an Independent Registered Municipal Advisor with the Security Exchange Commission and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board,has submitted a proposal to provide advisory services that will assist the City in evaluating the feasibility of establishing an EIFD.KFS will advise on boundary options,potential tax increment revenues,governance considerations,and initial engagement with the County of San Bernardino. This advisory work will provide the City with the necessary information to determine whether to move forward with EIFD formation and/or consider other financing approaches for these necessary public infrastructure projects.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Pursuing an EIFD requires careful coordination with the County and other taxing entities,as a portion of property tax increment would be dedicated toward significant public infrastructure projects. School districts are precluded under EIFD law. Before any commitment to form an EIFD can be made, the City must understand the potential revenue capacity,the types of infrastructure that could be funded,and the governance structure required by State law.

Engaging KFS at this early stage will give the City a clear picture of whether projected tax increment is sufficient to support meaningful projects. Their analysis will also help determine which boundary alternatives would best align with development priorities while maximizing funding potential. In addition,the City will gain an understanding of

the steps and timeline required for formation and will be positioned to begin discussions with the County regarding participation.

The outcome of this analysis will not commit the City to forming an EIFD but will provide a clear path forward should the City Council wish to pursue this financing tool. Kosmont is a recognized leader in economic development advisory services and has partnered with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) to develop an EIFD/CRIA Technical Screening Tool that assists member cities in evaluating the feasibility of these critical financing mechanisms.

Professional services agreements are exempt from bidding requirements under Section 12.1 of the City's Purchasing Policy,however this agreement marks the third project that the City is intending to procure with Kosmont this fiscal year, and collectively exceeds the City Manager's approval threshold. As set forth in Upland Municipal Code §2.04.070(C)(UMC),the City Manager may authorize expenditures up to$50,000 for any one vendor in a given fiscal year.While the other projects with Kosmont are for separate scopes,given the aforementioned UMC requirement,the cumulative expenditure will now exceed the permissible threshold,thus requiring City Council approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).According to Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines,the proposed action does not meet the definition of a"project"under CEQA and is therefore exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The total cost for services provided is$47,500.There are available funds in the City Administration Contract Services Account No. 1011201-5253.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

CITY OF UPLAND

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is made and entered into as of September 08, 2025 by and between the City of Upland, a public agency organized and operating under the laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 460 N. Euclid Avenue, Upland, CA 91786 ("City"), and Kosmont Transactions Services, Inc. dba Kosmont Financial Services, a California corporation with its principal place of business at 2301 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 4140, El Segundo, CA 90245 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as "Party" and collectively as "Parties" in this Agreement.

RECITALS
A. City is a public agency of the State of California and is in need of professional services for the following project: for Financing District Advisory services (hereinafter referred to as "the Project").

B. Consultant is duly licensed and has the necessary qualifications to provide such services.

C. The Parties desire by this Agreement to establish the terms for City to retain Consultant to provide the services described herein.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Services.

Consultant shall provide the City with the services described in the Scope of Services attached hereto as Exhibit "A."

2. Compensation.
a. Subject to paragraph 2(b) below, the City shall pay for such services in accordance with the Schedule of Charges set forth in Exhibit "B." b. In no event shall the total amount paid for services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement exceed the sum of $49,400.00 [forty-nine thousand four hundred]. This amount is to cover all printing and related costs, and the City will not pay any additional fees for printing expenses. Periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of receipt of an invoice which includes a detailed description of the work performed. Payments to Consultant for work performed will be made on a monthly billing basis.
c. The City Manager may approve Additional Work, as further defined in Section 3, up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement or fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). In no event shall the total sum of the agreement (original compensation amount and Additional Work) exceed fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council.

3. Additional Work.
1

If changes in the work seem merited by Consultant or the City, and informal consultations with the other party indicate that a change is warranted, it shall be processed in the following manner: a letter outlining the changes shall be forwarded to the City by Consultant with a statement of estimated changes in fee or time schedule. An amendment to this Agreement shall be prepared by the City and executed by both Parties before performance of such services, or the City will not be required to pay for the changes in the scope of work. Such amendment shall not render ineffective or invalidate unaffected portions of this Agreement.

4. Maintenance of Records.

Books, documents, papers, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred shall be maintained by Consultant and made available at all reasonable times during the contract period and for four (4) years from the date of final payment under the contract for inspection by City.

5. Term.

The term of this Agreement shall be from September 8, 2025 to October 31, 2026, unless earlier terminated as provided herein. The Parties may, by mutual, written consent, extend the term of this Agreement if necessary to complete the Project. Consultant shall perform its services in a prompt and timely manner within the term of this Agreement and shall commence performance upon receipt of written notice from the City to proceed ("Notice to Proceed"). The Notice to Proceed shall set forth the date of commencement of work.

6. Delays in Performance.
a. Neither City nor Consultant shall be considered in default of this Agreement for delays in performance caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the non- performing party. For purposes of this Agreement, such circumstances include but are not limited to, abnormal weather conditions; floods; earthquakes; fire; epidemics; pandemics; war; riots and other civil disturbances; strikes, lockouts, work slowdowns, and other labor disturbances; sabotage or judicial restraint.
b. Should such circumstances occur, the non-performing party shall, within a reasonable time of being prevented from performing, give written notice to the other party describing the circumstances preventing continued performance and the efforts being made to resume performance of this Agreement.

7. Compliance with Law.
a. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of the federal, state and local government, including Cal/OSHA requirements. b. If required, Consultant shall assist the City, as requested, in obtaining and maintaining all permits required of Consultant by federal, state and local regulatory agencies. c. If applicable, Consultant is responsible for all costs of clean up and/ or removal of hazardous and toxic substances spilled as a result of his or her services or operations performed under this Agreement.

8. Standard of Care
2

Consultant's services will be performed in accordance with generally accepted professional practices and principles and in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions.

9. Assignment and Subconsultant
Consultant shall not assign, sublet, or transfer this Agreement or any rights under or interest in this Agreement without the written consent of the City, which may be withheld for any reason. Any attempt to so assign or so transfer without such consent shall be void and without legal effect and shall constitute grounds for termination. Subcontracts, if any, shall contain a provision making them subject to all provisions stipulated in this Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall prevent Consultant from employing independent associates, and subconsultants as Consultant may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of services hereunder.

10. Independent Contractor
Consultant is retained as an independent contractor and is not an employee of City. No employee or agent of Consultant shall become an employee of City. The work to be performed shall be in accordance with the work described in this Agreement, subject to such directions and amendments from City as herein provided.
a. PERS Eligibility Indemnification
In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement claims or is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System ("PERS") to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of the City, Consultant shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City.

Notwithstanding any other agency, state or federal policy, rule, regulation, law or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing service under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to, and hereby agree to waive any claims to, any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in PERS as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contribution and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits.

11. Insurance. Consultant shall not commence work for the City until it has provided evidence satisfactory to the City it has secured all insurance required under this section. In addition, Consultant shall not allow any subcontractor to commence work on any subcontract until it has secured all insurance required under this section. a. Commercial General Liability
(i) The Consultant shall take out and maintain, during the performance of all work under this Agreement, in amounts not less than specified herein, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City. 3

(ii) Coverage for Commercial General Liability insurance shall be at least as broad as the following:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (Occurrence Form CG 00 01) or exact equivalent. (iii) Commercial General Liability Insurance must include coverage for the following:
(1) Bodily Injury and Property Damage
(2) Personal Injury/Advertising Injury
(3) Premises/Operations Liability
(4) Products/Completed Operations Liability
(5) Aggregate Limits that Apply per Project
(6) Explosion, Collapse and Underground (UCX) exclusion deleted
(7) Property Damage
(iv) The policy shall contain no endorsements or provisions limiting coverage for (1) cross liability exclusion for claims or suits by one insured against another; (2) products/completed operations liability; or (3) contain any other exclusion contrary to the Agreement.
(v) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status using ISO endorsement forms CG 20 10 10 01 and 20 37 10 01, or endorsements providing the exact same coverage. (vi) The general liability program may utilize either deductibles or provide coverage excess of a self-insured retention, subject to written approval by the City, and provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured. b. Automobile Liability
(i) At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain Automobile Liability Insurance for bodily injury and property damage including coverage for owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City.
(ii) Coverage for automobile liability insurance shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 00 01 covering automobile liability (Coverage Symbol 1, any auto).
(iii) The policy shall give City, its officials, officers, employees, agents and City designated volunteers additional insured status. (iv) Subject to written approval by the City, the automobile liability program may utilize deductibles, provided that such deductibles shall not apply to the City as an additional insured, but not a self-insured retention.
c. Workers' Compensation/Employer's Liability
4

(i) Consultant certifies that he/she is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for workers' compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that code, and he/she will comply with such provisions before commencing work under this Agreement.
(ii) To the extent Consultant has employees at any time during the term of this Agreement, at all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement, the Consultant shall maintain full compensation insurance for all persons employed directly by him/her to carry out the work contemplated under this Agreement, all in accordance with the "Workers' Compensation and Insurance Act," Division IV of the Labor Code of the State of California and any acts amendatory thereof, and Employer's Liability Coverage in amounts indicated herein. Consultant shall require all subconsultants to obtain and maintain, for the period required by this Agreement, workers' compensation coverage of the same type and limits as specified in this section.
d. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions)
At all times during the performance of the work under this Agreement the Consultant shall maintain professional liability or Errors and Omissions insurance appropriate to its profession, in a form and with insurance companies acceptable to the City and in an amount indicated herein.

This insurance shall be endorsed to include contractual liability applicable to this Agreement and shall be written on a policy form specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Consultant. "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this Agreement. The policy must"pay on behalf of"the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. e. Minimum Policy Limits Required
(i) The following insurance limits are required for the Agreement:

Combined Single Limit
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 per occurrence/ $4,000,000 aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury, and property
damage
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 combined single limit Employer's Liability $1,000,000 per accident or disease Professional Liability $2,000,000 per claim and aggregate (errors and omissions)
(ii) Requirements of specific coverage or limits contained in this section are not intended as a limitation on coverage, limits, or other requirement, or a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any insurance. Any available coverage shall be provided to the parties required to be named as Additional Insured pursuant to this Agreement. f. Evidence Required
5

Prior to execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall file with the City evidence of insurance from an insurer or insurers certifying to the coverage of all insurance required herein. Such evidence shall include original copies of the ISO CG 00 01 (or insurer's equivalent) signed by the insurer's representative and Certificate of Insurance (Acord Form 25-S or equivalent), together with required endorsements. All evidence of insurance shall be signed by a properly authorized officer, agent, or qualified representative of the insurer and shall certify the names of the insured, any additional insureds, where appropriate, the type and amount of the insurance, the location and operations to which the insurance applies, and the expiration date of such insurance.
g. Policy Provisions Required
(i) Consultant shall provide the City at least thirty (30) days prior written notice of cancellation of any policy required by this Agreement, except that the Consultant shall provide at least ten (10) days prior written notice of cancellation of any such policy due to non-payment of premium. If any of the required coverage is cancelled or expires during the term of this Agreement, the Consultant shall deliver renewal certificate(s) including the General Liability Additional Insured Endorsement to the City at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date of cancellation or expiration.
(ii) The Commercial General Liability Policy and Automobile Policy shall each contain a provision stating that Consultant's policy is primary insurance and that any insurance, self-insurance or other coverage maintained by the City or any named insureds shall not be called upon to contribute to any loss.
(iii) The retroactive date (if any) of each policy is to be no later than the effective date of this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain such coverage continuously for a period of at least three years after the completion of the work under this Agreement. Consultant shall purchase a one (1) year extended reporting period A) if the retroactive date is advanced past the effective date of this Agreement; B) if the policy is cancelled or not renewed; or C) if the policy is replaced by another claims-made policy with a retroactive date subsequent to the effective date of this Agreement.
(iv) All required insurance coverages, except for the professional liability coverage, shall contain or be endorsed to provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers or shall specifically allow Consultant or others providing insurance evidence in compliance with these specifications to waive their right of recovery prior to a loss. Consultant hereby waives its own right of recovery against City, and shall require similar written express waivers and insurance clauses from each of its subconsultants.
(v) The limits set forth herein shall apply separately to each insured against whom claims are made or suits are brought, except with respect to the limits of liability.

Further the limits set forth herein shall not be construed to relieve the Consultant from liability in excess of such coverage, nor shall it limit the Consultant's indemnification obligations to the City and shall not preclude the City from taking such other actions available to the City under other provisions of the Agreement or law.
h. Qualifying Insurers
(i) All policies required shall be issued by acceptable insurance companies, as determined by the City, which satisfy the following minimum requirements:
6

(1) Each such policy shall be from a company or companies with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII and admitted to transact in the business of insurance in the State of California, or otherwise allowed to place insurance through surplus line brokers under applicable provisions of the California Insurance Code or any federal law.

Additional Insurance Provisions
(i) The foregoing requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant, and any approval of said insurance by the City, is not intended to and shall not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to, the provisions concerning indemnification.
(ii) If at any time during the life of the Agreement, any policy of insurance required under this Agreement does not comply with these specifications or is canceled and not replaced, City has the right but not the duty to obtain the insurance it deems necessary and any premium paid by City will be promptly reimbursed by Consultant or City will withhold amounts sufficient to pay premium from Consultant payments. In the alternative, City may cancel this Agreement.
(iii) The City may require the Consultant to provide complete copies of all insurance policies in effect for the duration of the Project. (iv) Neither the City nor any of its officials, officers, employees, agents or volunteers shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or by virtue of this Agreement.
j. Subconsultant Insurance Requirements. Consultant shall not allow any subcontractors or subconsultants to commence work on any subcontract until they have provided evidence satisfactory to the City that they have secured all insurance required under this section.

Policies of commercial general liability insurance provided by such subcontractors or subconsultants shall be endorsed to name the City as an additional insured using ISO form CG 20 38 04 13 or an endorsement providing the exact same coverage. If requested by Consultant, City may approve different scopes or minimum limits of insurance for particular subcontractors or subconsultants.

12. Indemnification.
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall defend (with counsel of City's choosing), indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees, volunteers, and agents free and harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, costs, expenses, liability, loss, damage or injury of any kind, in law or equity, to property or persons, including wrongful death, in any manner arising out of, pertaining to, or incident to any acts, errors or omissions, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officials, officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants or agents in connection with the performance of the Consultant's services, the Project or this Agreement, including the payment of all damages, reasonable expert witness fees and reasonable attorney's fees and other related costs and expenses. Consultant's obligation to indemnify shall not be restricted to insurance proceeds, if any, received by Consultant, the City, its officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. 7

b. If Consultant's obligation to defend, indemnify, and/or hold harmless arises out of Consultant's performance of "design professional" services (as that term is defined under Civil Code section 2782.8), then, and only to the extent required by Civil Code section 2782.8, which is fully incorporated herein, Consultant's indemnification obligation shall be limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant, and, upon Consultant obtaining a final adjudication by a court of competent jurisdiction, Consultant's liability for such claim, including the cost to defend, shall not exceed the Consultant's proportionate percentage of fault.

13. California Labor Code Requirements.
a. Consultant is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and 1770 et seq., which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on certain "public works" and "maintenance" projects ("Prevailing Wage Laws"). If the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, Consultant agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claims, liabilities, costs, penalties or interest arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It shall be mandatory upon the Consultant and all subconsultants to comply with all California Labor Code provisions, which include but are not limited to prevailing wages (Labor Code Sections 1771, 1774 and 1775), employment of apprentices (Labor Code Section 1777.5), certified payroll records (Labor Code Sections 1771.4 and 1776), hours of labor(Labor Code Sections 1813 and 1815) and debarment of contractors and subcontractors (Labor Code Section 1777.1). The requirement to submit certified payroll records directly to the Labor Commissioner under Labor Code section 1771.4 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Section 1771.4. b. If the services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, then pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1, the Consultant and all subconsultants performing such services must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall maintain registration for the duration of the Project and require the same of any subconsultants, as applicable. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the contractor registration requirements mandated by Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1 shall not apply to work performed on a public works project that is exempt pursuant to the small project exemption specified in Labor Code Sections 1725.5 and 1771.1. c. This Agreement may also be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations. It shall be Consultant's sole responsibility to comply with all applicable registration and labor compliance requirements. Any stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor that affect Consultant's performance of services, including any delay, shall be Consultant's sole responsibility. Any delay arising out of or resulting from such stop orders shall be considered Consultant caused delay and shall not be compensable by the City. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of stop orders issued by the Department of Industrial Relations against Consultant or any subcontractor.

14. Verification of Employment Eligibility.
8

By executing this Agreement, Consultant verifies that it fully complies with all requirements and restrictions of state and federal law respecting the employment of undocumented aliens, including, but not limited to, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, as may be amended from time to time, and shall require all subconsultants and sub-subconsultants to comply with the same.

15. Reserved.

16. Laws and Venue.

This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of San Bernardino, State of California. 17 Termination or Abandonment
a. City has the right to terminate or abandon any portion or all of the work under this Agreement by giving ten (10)calendar days written notice to Consultant. In such event, City shall be immediately given title and possession to all original field notes, drawings and specifications, written reports and other documents produced or developed for that portion of the work completed and/or being abandoned. City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered for any portion of the work completed prior to termination. If said termination occurs prior to completion of any task for the Project for which a payment request has not been received, the charge for services performed during such task shall be the reasonable value of such services, based on an amount mutually agreed to by City and Consultant of the portion of such task completed but not paid prior to said termination. City shall not be liable for any costs other than the charges or portions thereof which are specified herein. Consultant shall not be entitled to payment for unperformed services, and shall not be entitled to damages or compensation for termination of work.
b. Consultant may terminate its obligation to provide further services under this Agreement upon thirty(30)calendar days'written notice to City only in the event of substantial failure by City to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of Consultant.
18 Documents. Except as otherwise provided in "Termination or Abandonment," above, all original field notes, written reports, Drawings and Specifications and other documents, produced or developed for the Project shall, upon payment in full for the services described in this Agreement, be furnished to and become the property of the City.

19. Organization
Consultant shall assign Joseph Dieguez as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall not be removed from the Project or reassigned without the prior written consent of the City.

20. Limitation of Agreement.

This Agreement is limited to and includes only the work included in the Project described above.

21. Notice
9

Any notice or instrument required to be given or delivered by this Agreement may be given or delivered by depositing the same in any United States Post Office, certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed to:

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City of Upland Kosmont Transactions Services, Inc. dba 460 N. Euclid Avenue Kosmont Financial Services
Upland, CA 91786 1601 N Sepulveda Blvd., #382,
Attn: City Manager's Office Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 Attn: Larry J. Kosmont
and shall be effective upon receipt thereof.

22. Third Party Rights
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than the City and the Consultant.

23. Equal Opportunity Employment.

Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and that it shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, age or other interests protected by the State or Federal Constitutions. Such non-discrimination shall include, but not be limited to, all activities related to initial employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination.

24. Entire Agreement
This Agreement, with its exhibits, represents the entire understanding of City and Consultant as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes and cancels any prior or contemporaneous oral or written understanding, promises or representations with respect to those matters covered hereunder. Each Party acknowledges that no representations, inducements, promises or agreements have been made by any person which are not incorporated herein, and that any other agreements shall be void. This Agreement may not be modified or altered except in writing signed by both Parties hereto. This is an integrated Agreement.

25. Severability
The unenforceability, invalidity or illegality of any provision(s) of this Agreement shall not render the remaining provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal.

26. Successors and Assigns
This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors in interest, executors, administrators and assigns of each Party to this Agreement. However, Consultant shall not assign or transfer by operation of law or otherwise any or all of its rights, burdens, duties or obligations without the prior written consent of City. Any attempted assignment without such consent shall be invalid and void.
10

27. Non-Waiver
None of the provisions of this Agreement shall be considered waived by either Party, unless such waiver is specifically specified in writing.

28. Time of Essence
Time is of the essence for each and every provision of this Agreement.

29. City's Right to Employ Other Consultants
City reserves its right to employ other consultants, including engineers, in connection with this Project or other projects.

30. Prohibited Interests
Consultant maintains and warrants that it has not employed nor retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement. Further, Consultant warrants that it has not paid nor has it agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right to rescind this Agreement without liability. For the term of this Agreement, no director, official, officer or employee of City, during the term of his or her service with City, shall have any direct interest in this Agreement, or obtain any present or anticipated material benefit arising therefrom.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]
11

SIGNATURE PAGE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN CITY OF UPLAND
AND KOSMONT TRANSACTIONS SERVICES, INC. DBA KOSMONT FINANCIAL

SERVICES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date first above written.

CITY OF UPLAND KOSMONT TRANSACTIONS SERVICES, INC.

DBA KOSMONT FINANCIAL SERVICES
Approved By:

By: By:

Michael Blay,
City Manager
Its:

Printed Name:

ATTEST:

By: By:

Keri Johnson
City Clerk
Its:

Printed Name:

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
City Attorney
12

EXHIBIT A
Scope of Services
I. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
• The City has expressed interest in assistance from the Consultant related to the evaluation of a tax increment financing ("TIF") district, such as an Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District ("EIFD"), encompassing economic development opportunity sites in Downtown Upland and potentially other sites. As the State's leader in evaluation and implementation of TIF districts among other economic development expertise, Consultant proposes the following Scope of Services.

II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
• Approach to Tasks: The prospective assignment and consulting services that Consultant will provide will be of a relatively limited scope and duration, and advisory in nature. Consultant will be making recommendations only, which advise the Client and jurisdictions, including their elected officials, appointed officials, and staff, which they can accept or reject. None of Consultant's staff will act in a capacity as an elected official, nor as an appointed official, nor as staff, nor as serving in a "designated" position.

Task 1: Overview of Tools and Evaluation of Boundary Alternatives Consultant will coordinate a kickoff meeting with the City to discuss the City's objectives for this engagement, and for Consultant to present an overview of relevant financing district tools.

Based on input during initial discussions, Consultant will identify and evaluate up to three (3) potential boundary alternatives for a TIF district that could support the City's objectives.

Consultant will analyze key strategic implementation considerations, including:
a) Property ownership (e.g., City-owned parking lots)
b) Planned / proposed future development (e.g., Downtown, other) c) Infrastructure needs and estimated costs
d) Potential public and private sector partners (e.g., City, County of San Bernardino, other affected taxing entities)
e) Overlap with former Redevelopment Agency Project Area boundaries and status of redevelopment dissolution
f) Potential to utilize alternative public financing approaches (e.g., lease revenue bond, State programs, other).

Task 2: Revenue and Bonding Capacity Analysis
Consultant will prepare a tax increment revenue analysis that will identify:
a) Potential assessed value increase from future development within the preferred boundary alternative(s)
b) Property tax increment funding capacity at select annual benchmarks and cumulatively over the estimated district lifetime(s)
c) Different levels of tax increment revenue allocation by taxing entity (e.g., 25%, 50%) d) Initial estimates of potential bonding capacity
e) Complementary economic development tools and funding resources (e.g., community facilities district [CFD] financing)
f) As related to potential overlap of proposed district boundaries with former redevelopment agency project areas, analysis of corresponding relevant outstanding enforceable obligations and implications on available revenues. 13

Task 3: Governance and Implementation Roadmap
Based on the preferred financing district tool(s) identified by the Client based on previous Task findings, Consultant will evaluate and summarize feasible governance and implementation alternatives, including district governing board composition, voting /approval procedures, district formation milestones, debt issuance procedures, and estimated timing, in order to provide potential public and private sector stakeholders with an illustrative "roadmap" for implementation.

Task 4: Initial Meeting and Presentation Assistance
Kosmont will coordinate a virtual meeting with City staff, City Council, and/or other key community stakeholders, such as residents, property owners, and/or local developers. Kosmont will prepare and present a summary of feasibility analysis findings. As available budget may allow, Consultant will coordinate and participate in initial discussions with County of San Bernardino representatives (e.g., Administrative Office staff, Supervisorial Office representatives) regarding potential partnership in a TIF district.

The purpose of the initial meetings will be to facilitate education of key stakeholders, to vet initial interest in partnership, and ultimately to confirm whether to proceed into the financing district implementation phase, or not.

Potential Future Services
• Discussions and Negotiations with County Representatives on Financing District Terms • City/ County/Other Taxing Entity Fiscal Impact Analysis • Resolution of Intention and Establishment of the Governing Public Financing Authority • Infrastructure Financing Plan Preparation
• Financing District Formation Meetings and Hearings • State Board of Equalization Financing District Boundary Application • Assistance with tax increment financings (e.g., tax increment allocation bonds) • Annual Compliance Report Preparation, Related Presentations at PFA Public Hearings • Continuing Disclosure as related to Financing District debt transactions.

Ill. SCHEDULE AND REQUIRED DATA
• Consultant is prepared to commence work upon receipt of executed Agreement and project data outlined below. A summary PowerPoint presentation with separate analysis detail exhibits characterizing findings from Tasks 1-3 is anticipated to be delivered within three (3) months from assignment authorization. Timing of stakeholder briefings will be contingent on stakeholder availability.

Client will provide Consultant with existing project data, including relevant planning documentation, project site plans, and information related to potential infrastructure improvements with estimated range of costs, as available. 14

EXHIBIT B
Schedule of Charges/Payments
Consultant will invoice City on a monthly cycle. Consultant will include with each invoice a detailed progress report that indicates the amount of budget spent on each task. Consultant will inform City regarding any out-of-scope work being performed by Consultant.

IV. COMPENSATION
• The compensation for Tasks 1 through 4 is outlined below for professional services (hourly) fees at Consultant's billing rates as reflected below.

TASK ESTIMATED BUDGET
1) Overview of Tools and Evaluation of Boundary Alternatives $15,500 2) Revenue and Bonding Capacity Analysis $14,000 3) Governance and Implementation Roadmap $5,500
4) Initial Meeting and Presentation Assistance $12,500 Estimated Total Professional Services (Hourly) Fees $47,500 If necessary, additional rounds of comments and revisions can be accommodated on an hourly basis.

Consultant's attendance or participation at any publicly noticed meeting, whether such participation is in person, digital, video and/or telephonic (e.g., City Council, Planning Commission, Public Agency Board, other), as requested by Client is in addition to compensation for Tasks 1 through 4 and will be billed at the professional services (hourly) fees as shown.

Hourly Rate Fee Schedule
President & CEO $525.00/hour
Sr. Managing Director/ Sr. Vice President/ Senior Advisor $395.00/hour Vice President $295.00/hour
Senior Project Analyst $205.00/hour
Project Analyst/ Project Research $195.00/hour Assistant Project Analyst/Assistant Project Manager $165.00/hour Project Promotion/Graphics/GIS Mapping Services $ 95.00/hour Clerical Support $ 80.00/hour
15

4 or UN
`t', :,..,

CALIFORNIA LEVINE ACT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Ogt�......._,7
4-011 California Government Code Section 84308, commonly referred to as the "Levine Act," prohibits City Officers from participating in any action concerning a license, permit,other entitlement for use,franchise, or contract(collectively"license, permit,or contract") if they receive political contribution(s)from a party, or its agent(s), totaling more than $500 within the twelve (12) months before the proceeding, while a proceeding is pending, and for twelve (12) months following the date of a final decision in a proceeding.

The Levine Act also requires a member of the Upland City Council who has received such a contribution to disclose the contribution on the record of the proceeding and recuse themselves before the proceeding unless the violation has been properly cured.

Current Upland City Council Members are listed at:
https://www.uplandca.gov/city-council-treasurer
Parties and their Agents are responsible for accessing the link to review the names and disclosing their applicable contributions to City Officers on the record of a proceeding.

As a party to a proceeding,you are also required to provide information below about contributions made by you, your agents on behalf of you or your organization, your organization subject to the proceeding with the City, and any organization you direct or control pursuant to the aggregation rules at FPPC Reg. § 18438.5, except for uncompensated officers of a nonprofit organization. This form is to be submitted to the City of Upland and is a public record. If you have any questions about this form, please contact your City representative for assistance.

1. Have you or your company,or any agent/board member on behalf of you or your company/entity, made any political contributions of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months preceding the date of the submission of your proposal or application,or the anticipated date of any Council action?
YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):

X NO

2. Do you or your company/entity, or any agency on behalf of you or your company/entity, anticipate or plan to make any political contribution of more than $500 to any Upland City Council Member in the 12 months following any Council action related to your proposal or application? YES If yes, please identify the Council Member(s):

X NO
Answering yes to either of the two questions above does not preclude the Upland City Council from awarding a contract or approving an application or any subsequent action. It does, however, preclude the identified Council Member(s)from participating in any actions related to your proposal or application.

August 28, 20254,x) -
Date Signature of authorized individual
Kosmont Transactions Services, Inc.,dba Kosmont Financial Services Company/Applicant Name
(Levine Act definitions on reverse side)

,�A:i' °p` , CITFUPLAND
, �` "The City of Gracious Living"
,i,,-,,,,,,'' Stair( --q9Q1c11
DATE: September 8,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:DAMIEN R.ARRULA,ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER

RICHARD SMIDERLE,OPERATIONS MANAGER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVING AN INCREASE TO PURCHASE ORDER NO.20260024 WITH HOLLIDAY ROCK BY$40,000 FOR A TOTAL AMOUNT OF$90,000
RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council authorize an increase to Purchase Order No. 20260024 with Holliday Rock Co.,Inc. for Fiscal Year 2025-26 by$40,000 for a total amount of$90,000.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed action is consistent with the City's objective of preserving and enhancing the public infrastructure, ensuring the continued provision of safe,efficient and reliable services to the community.

BACKGROUND
For Fiscal Year 2025-26, the Public Works Department Water Division under the City Manager's authority, established an annual Purchase Order with Holliday Rock in the amount of$50,000 to facilitate the acquisition of rock,sand,asphalt,and concrete materials.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Based on an evaluation of departmental needs,the Public Works Operations Division has determined that they expect to spend approximately $40,000 during Fiscal Year 2025-26 on the acquisition of rock, sand, asphalt, and concrete materials. Therefore,the annual Purchase Order needs to be increased to$90,000 to accommodate both divisions.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The proposed action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines defines a project subject to CEQA. The proposed action is not included within the definition of a"project" and thus is exempt.

FISCAL IMPACTS
The total Purchase Order increase is $40,000. There are available funds in Street Maintenance Other Supplies/Materials Account No. 2045401-5217.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA:Not a Project.

::, Up`q� CITYUPLAND
. . "The City of Gracious Living"
l'lrFOR0i''
DATE: September 8,2025
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: MICHAEL BLAY,CITY MANAGER
PREPARED BY:ROBERT D.DALQUEST,DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR

JOSHUA WINTER, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT REZONING PROGRAM RECOMMENDED ACTION:

It is recommended that the City Council conduct a public hearing and: 1) Adopt a Resolution (Attachment A) approving an Addendum to the Upland General Plan Environmental Impact Report finding that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)pursuant to Section 21166 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, and that the project is exempt pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080.085; as well as, approving General Plan Amendment No. 23-0001 to modify the General Plan land use designations of properties shown in Exhibit B to the Resolution and modify the General Plan Land Use Element as shown in Exhibit C to the Resolution; 2) Hold first reading by title only, waive further reading and introduce an Ordinance (Attachment B) approving Zone Change No. 23-0001, to change the zoning designations of properties shown in Exhibit A to the Ordinance and approving Zone Code Text Amendment No.25-0003 to amend the Upland Municipal Code Sections 17.04, 17.05 and 17.09 as shown in Exhibit B,C and D to the Ordinance; and 3)Hold first reading by title only, waive further reading and introduce an Ordinance (Attachment C) approving Specific Plan Amendment No. 23-0001 to modify the district designation of 530 E. 9th Street from "Pleasant View District" to "Citrus Transportation District" as shown in Exhibit A to the Ordinance and to increase the permitted residential density within the Multi-Family/Senior Housing District in the Specific Plan from 25 du/ac to 40 du/ac as shown in Exhibit B to the Ordinance.

GOAL STATEMENT
The proposed project supports the City's goal to encourage new,balanced growth with a range of housing choices.

BACKGROUND
The project includes the implementation of the recently adopted 6th Cycle Housing Element, specifically processing modifications to the City's General Plan, General Plan Land Use Map, Zoning Code and Zoning Map, as well as Specific Plan Amendments necessary to implement the City of Upland Housing Element and receive final certification from the State of California's Housing and Community Development Dept lenient.This portion of the project includes the implementation of multiple programs within the City of Upland Housing Element,as follows:

1. General Plan Amendment No. 23-0001 to modify the General Plan land use designations of properties included on the Housing Element Sites Inventory and to modify the land use element to include language defining the characteristics of the Multi-Family High(MFR-H)designation.

2. Zone Change No.23-0001,to change the zoning designations of properties listed within the adopted 6th cycle Housing Element Update that accommodate the mandatory Regional Housing Needs Allocation(RHNA).

3. Zone Code Text Amendment No.25-0003 to make various modifications to Upland Municipal Code(UMC), Title 17(Zoning Ordinance),which includes:
a. Creating a new Transit Overlay Zone with new development standards within UMC Chapter 17.09 (Overlay Zones);
b. Creating a new Residential Multi-Family High (RM-40) zoning designation and amending UMC Chapter 17.04 (Residential Zones)to include new development standards for the proposed R-40 zone, and eliminate the use permit requirements for residential uses,among other minor modifications;

c. Amending UMC Chapter 17.05 (Mixed-Use Zones) to increase the allowed density for the Business/Residential Mixed-Use(B/R-MU)zone from 20 du/ac to 30 du/ac and eliminate the use permit requirements for residential uses,among other minor modifications.

4. Specific Plan Amendment No. 23-0001 to modify the district designation of 530 E.9th street from"Pleasant View District"to"Citrus Transportation District"and to increase the permitted residential density within the Multi-Family/Senior Housing district from 25 du/ac to 40 du/ac.

State law requires each city to adopt a General Plan to guide land use and development within the City. The Housing Element is among the various required elements of the General Plan,which describes City policies and programs for maintaining and improving existing housing,as well as encouraging development of new housing to meet the City's assigned share of regional growth needs under the Regional Housing Needs Assessment ("RHNA"). The Housing Element Update demonstrates how the City's share of regional housing needs growth will be accommodated for the eight-year planning period. The State forecasts the need for housing based on population projections, employment, and household growth. Each City must show how it will accommodate its need through designating areas for the City's share of housing allocation. The City of Upland's allocation for the 2021-2029 planning period is 5,686 units.

The rezoning/upzoning are located throughout the City, as identified in the Housing Element Sites Inventory. The existing capacity of these subject parcels to be rezoned is 2,163 units. The new maximum housing capacity,based on the proposed rezoning of the subject parcels, would be 5,277 units. Together with the existing sites in the Housing Element Update not needing to be rezoned,will together meet the RHNA number mandated by the State Department of Housing and Community Development(HCD),and a State mandated 15%buffer.

The proposed Housing Element Rezoning Program would not directly result in development on the identified parcels.

Each subsequent proposed development on the rezoned sites would be subject to compliance with all Federal, State, and local regulations, including a development-specific environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act,compliance with the City of Upland General Plan and Municipal Code regulations including the required entitlement process.

The City began the process of updating the Housing Element in 2020,which consisted of drafting the Housing Element Update and hosting public workshops throughout 2021.Between 2021 and 2024,the City underwent multiple reviews with the California Department of Housing and Community Development(HCD),which required numerous revisions to the Housing Element document.Ultimately,HCD provided Upland with a letter of conditional compliance on June 17,2024(Attachment D).With the letter of conditional compliance in hand,the Planning Commission,at its Special Meeting on August 22, 2024, conducted a public hearing and recommended the City Council approve the Housing Element Update. On September 23, 2024, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the Housing Element Update.

The HCD letter of conditional compliance included two requirements: (1)The Housing Element must be re-adopted by City Council, which has already occurred, and (2) the rezonings outlined within the Housing Element Sites Inventory must be completed.This second action is the subject of this staff report and Public Hearing,and will bring the City into full compliance with State Law and will result in the City obtaining certification of the Housing Element by HCD.

For additional background information regarding Housing Elements, please refer to the staff reports and materials from the previous public meetings posted on the City website at https://www.uplandca.gov/2021-2029-housing- element-update.

Prior to the City Council review of the proposed project, the Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the project and heard many comments from residents which primarily concerned two housing sites,one located on the vacant land behind the northwest corner of Arrow Highway and San Antonios Avenue, and the other located 502 E. 21'Street. At the meeting,the Planning Commission recommended the City Council approve the Housing Element Rezoning Prgram,with a density reduction to the above-mentioned properties. These revisions are discussed within the analysis section below.

ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
General Plan Goals and Policies
The proposed actions are consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies:

Policy HE-2.1: Housing Growth. Direct new housing The proposed project implements the rezonings growth into strategic locations that strengthen the City's identified in the City's adopted Housing Element.These economy,maximize existing and planned infrastructure, rezonings create new housing opportunities that, in and foster the use and development of transit and many cases, encourage multimodal transportation, and multimodal transportation.These areas include Historic new development within the focus areas, including Downtown, Foothill Boulevard, Southeast Quadrant, Historic Downtown, the Southeast Quadrant, and and College Heights. College Heights.

Policy HE-2.2 Housing Diversity: Provide high-quality The proposed rezonings provide a variety of zoning housing in a range of types,densities,and unit sizes that designations that will permit a broad range of housing meet the housing needs of residents of all income levels types, densities ranging from 10 du/ac to 55 du/ac,that and household types.This includes single-and multiple- will meet the housing needs of residents of all income family housing, senior developments, mixed-use levels and household types. _projects,and transit-oriented developments. _ Policy HE-2.4: Housing Incentives. Facilitate the The project includes Zoning Code Text amendments development of a mix of prices,types,and affordability that will implement the proposed Transit Overlay Zone of housing products through the implementation of and RM-40 (Multi-Family Residential High) zone that flexible standards, efficient permitting process, and include more flexible development standards. other assistance. Furthermore, the text amendments eliminate the requirement of a conditional/administrative use permit
for residential development.

Policy LU-1.2 Permitted Densities and Intensities. The project includes General Plan amendments that Ensure existing and future zoning designations correspond to changes within the Zoning Code. correspond to the permitted density and intensity ranges as listed in Table LU-1 of the Land Use Element. _ Policy LU-4.1 Infill Development. Encourage mixed- The project includes the rezoning of many parcels that use, infill development on brownfields or underutilized are vacant, underutilized, near public transportation parcels, particularly near public transit and within the commercial amenities and Historic Downtown. In historic downtown. addition, the new zoning designation encourages new residential development and new mixed-use
development.

Policy LU-5.4 Transit-Oriented Development. Support The proposed project includes the creation of a new the development of multi-family residential and mixed- Transit Overlay zone near the Montclair Transit Center. use projects around transit stations by allowing a The overlay will include new development standards reduction in the parking requirements or other that will encourage Transit-Oriented Development such development standards. as a reduction in the parking requirements,setbacks and open space.

Site Selection Criteria
As mentioned above, the sites included in the proposed project are included in the adopted Housing Element. The criteria for site selection included various elements that have resulted in multiple developments occurring in the City.

The criteria included:
a. Residential development interest expressed by property owners or developers. b. Site conditions indicating a property is suitable for development or redevelopment during the planning period, such as vacant buildings,for sale/for lease signs,low land-to-improvement(LIR)value ratio,buildings more than 40 years old,signs of deferred maintenance or deterioration,or low site utilization(i.e.,current building floor area compared to market potential).
c. Proximity to public transportation, employment and educational opportunities, and urban services such as shopping, medical facilities and parks. The City considered if a site was within '/2 mile of a high-quality transit stop.
d. No incompatible uses or adverse development conditions such as high noise levels, heavy truck traffic, sensitive biological habitat,flood hazards or wildland fire hazards. e. The City has reviewed the properties and is not aware of any leases on underutilized sites that would prevent housing development during the planning period.

Not every site meets all characteristics identified,but all sites included are appropriate for redevelopment. The sites have similar uses to recent projects that were developed in the City and their redevelopment potential can be directly compared to these trends.

General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning District Modifications Described below are the proposed general plan land use and zoning modifications planned for within the adopted Housing Element. As noted above, these rezonings must be completed to receive final certification of the Housing Element from HCD. The format below includes the resulting density from the proposed Zoning/General Plan amendments, a description of the proposed Zoning Designation/General Plan designation, and analysis of example rezone sites,with examples of possible and/or proposed projects.

A. Density:40 Dwelling unit per acre(du/ac)
The project includes rezoning and/or upzoning of 132 parcels to allow residential uses up to 40 du/acre,in two different ways,which will allow up to 1,719 units.

1. Creation of a new Multi-Family Residential High(RM-40)Zoning Designation The first proposal involves the creation of a new RM-40 zoning designation and the implementation of the Multi-Family Residential High (MFR-H) land use designation in the General Plan. The RM-40 zone is intended to accommodate a range of high-density residential developments at densities of up to 40 dwelling units per net acre,not including any additional units allowed through City or State density bonus provisions.

Housing types permitted in this zone include three- to four-story apartment buildings, as well as duplexes and triplexes.These developments typically feature shared open spaces with enhanced landscaping,reduced setbacks(front,side,and rear),and shared access for driveways and parking.

Currently,the City's highest allowable residential density is 55 dwelling units per acre,permitted only within the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan area. The RM-40 designation is proposed for select locations throughout the City, specifically in areas with vacant land, adjacent to or near existing multi-family residential developments and in areas adjacent to high employment areas.A total of five(5)sites have been identified for the RM-40 designation,as shown in Table 1 below(highlighted in blue).

Table 1—Proposed RM-40 Areas
Location: East side of Benson Avenue, between 11th Street Location: Northwest corner of San Antonio Avenue and 9th and Arrow Route. Street.

Current Zoning: The parcels are currently zoned General Current Zoning: This area is currently zoned Industrial(GI). Business/Residential Mixed Use(B/R-MU).

Reason for Rezone:These properties are situated near existing Reason for Rezone: This area consists of a mix of vacant and multi-family residential developments. The parcel fronting underutilized parcels.The site is adjacent to both multi-family Arrow Route is largely underutilized and presents a significant residential and commercial uses. Redevelopment activity is opportunity for residential redevelopment. already underway,as demonstrated by the recent construction of a 7-unit apartment complex at the southeast corner of the Image 1 site.
1 .n .4 1 /:._ -. --
,+�h 5 Image 2
1 I °, 1 + l Il
„ _
ol iffl l s v y s
� 4 -• {� M a
I^

Location: Northwest corner of San Antonio Avenue and Location: Approximately 500 feet north of Foothill Blvd on Arrow Highway. Campus Avenue.

Current Zoning: It is currently zoned as Public (PB).

Reason for Rezoning: These parcels remain undeveloped and Current Zoning: The site is currently zoned RM-10 which are underutilized.The property owner has expressed interest in permits Multi-family residentialily uses at 10 du/ac density. residential development for many years. A development Reason for Rezoning: The site is currently owned by the San application for the development of a townhome project Bernardino County Housing Authority, whom, from time to consisting of 121 for-sale units,with an approximate density of time will rebuild outdated housing complexes. This site was 25 dwelling units per acre (du/ac)was recently submitted and orginally constructed in the 1950's, and upzoning could is currently under review by Planning Division staff.Following encourage redevelopment of the site. the approval of the proposed zone changes, the project will Image 4
proceed to the City Council for further review and action. A �_.� a11�J�'� ill
preliminary site plan has been included (Attachment E) to ? = ;JCT- L it ? ��• dim.k I �.-.�} ► 13Ih'St
provide the City Council with a conceptual overview of the it: 1= is ., '/% y��� t .Fr sl itiil5i
proposed development, as well as a reference for potential z� _, II,+ �, . development on other similarly zoned sites. ' Firs:-"" 12 'ram 0 Planning Commission: The Planning Commission d2 - . i, t .14 .i1.,, ' reccomended that this site be reduced from 40 du/ac to 30 r* �'r du/ac,which is proposed in the Resolution and Ordinance.The « .� .,k, :' City Council may approve of the reccomendation, or approve r .�•, ,,t - , • the modifications as orginally proposed. ; = �� 1 i 3 _� -
Image 3 r !� ' .dam w— z
,d �T... �I. ,3 ir. I�'lf E ValuJ 5�� • a �'�A' - _€.`. .. 1 - fp 60; -- 'I i ke S.'S'.''..,; , I
wil
61 MOH 1
AIII
,'A 'r Z`.. ___ ' M. �vitt F 0 ..-iF Fouthiill67 .. .' qi Ij - E1EaoI-illABlvd.� - -
_ "d '" 'a 9� In _ QI�i6ABlvd
ci
. ...r ��
le
F'i'�
r
. J .—.�
r- u _
)0 i' 7#
II
(_ R
.I..Z i' r �I - '-
�
ll llIU

2. Creation of a new Transit Overlay(TO)Zone
The second proposal includes the creation of the Transit Overlay Zone (TO) to support higher-density residential development in areas of the City close to a major transit center. No General Plan Land Use modifications are required for the implantation of the TO zone. The TO Zone would be an overlay over existing zoned areas to allow for modified development standards and increased density. This means that existing zoning rights are preserved, and no legal non-conforming issues will be created. Mixed-use development will still be permitted within the overlay. This new overlay zone is specifically located in the southwestern portion of the City(see Image 5).This area is adjacent to the Pacific Electric Trail and in close proximity to the Montclair Transit Center,making it well-suited for transit-oriented development.The TO is designed to encourage lot consolidation and new residential construction by implementing special development standards—such as reduced setbacks and parking requirements—that make higher-density

projects more feasible. The area is currently made up of numerous small parcels, which present an opportunity for consolidation and the creation of larger-scale developments. To further encourage this, the Zoning Code will require a minimum of one acre to reach the full density potential of 40 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The TO also includes eight parcels located north of the Pacific Electric Trail (highlighted in purple),which will allow for residential development at a density of up to 30 du/ac. One project has already been submitted within the TO area in anticipation of its approval. The proposed development is a for-sale townhome project with 39 units at an approximate density of 28 du/ac.This project is currently under review by the Planning Division and will be presented to the Planning Commission at a future date.A preliminary site plan is included for review(Attachment F).

Image 5
' I ?P. - *I.
r . . , --.
xl 4i - -r Will
r.. _/ NI irr+ 12� ��.ii l i� : _ LL �� --r= iii6?Ele[tr ir.•Llra'tw 1, _ !Aar .-III 3 _ . �n
t - Per i _ ram . I 1 .s .1
- 1 r
I' e �
M i
Y' all�� a pi ,,—,i
. .:., , Ji
, .
fiMe •. 1 r4 r
. Il
11 pp• Yx
ill •
,1 j
ill
_ m +fir^, _ �.�. _—�_...��. -"wow►. _ —. _ .-.. I .' ..

In addition to the for-sale townhome projects mentioned above,the RM-40 and Transit Overlay Zone could allow for a variety of housing types, typically between 20 and 40 du/ac. Table 2,below, includes projects that provide visual examples of the types of housing that can be built under this density. Common building types include mixed-use and mid-rise apartments,usually 3-to 4-stories tall,that include multiple units per building, often with elevators. Common amenities such as shared laundry, parking garages and courtyards are typically provided with architectural styles that tend to have more of an urban design. Townhouses are also typical but usually include smaller lot sizes or slightly more compact footprints, 2- to 3-stories, with private entrances and closer spacing between units than lower density zones.Stacked flats,garden apartments and senior apartments can be built and are typically 3-4 story buildings with units stacked vertically,shared open space amenities and more units per building footprint than at 30 du/acre. Duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes are also possible,which consist of 2 to 4 units in one building, arranged side-by-side or stacked and can be built in transitional areas between single-family zones and larger apartment projects.

Table 2
Example 1 (Image 6)
La Collina,Rolling Hills Estates,CA
Mixed Use Development
58-unit, 1.5 Acres
38 du/acre
�— i r b
61 `
um 1_1.--._ _,...,_ p. L .
{ Irma
e de, lb ilk IS
-"Ma1144
i .
•
151r ,.. E-•
, gi._ _ _ -
;- } --., _ _ . _-� -— ..i»ate i?! Te -dovr
•
iit _ __
Example 2(Image 7)
Grove Ave Project,Rancho Cucamonga,CA
Mixed Use Development
308-unit,9.5 Acres
33 du/acre
— .. i !, .� ��' L
II
•
y �,
�� �!l v

Example 3 (Image 8)
Vista Grande Court,Glendale
Multi-Family Development
66-unit, 1.5 Acres
44 du/acre(slightly above the permitted density)
• '41` 7 it 001 • •• ____,....--- • '''''''''' • Ilill I�E I ���
Est +k k.I i', .. I it
per:1111 � .M fII
`� • •S.
�. ��
v.
a
• 40 -, ihir.- : - - •
_:-
3 .

B. Density:30 Dwelling unit per acre(du/ac)
Similar to the above,the project includes rezoning and/or upzoning of 132 parcels to allow residential uses up to 30 du/acre,in two different ways,allowing for up to 1,250 units.

1. Increase the density in the Business/Residential Mixed-Use(B/M-RU)Zone The first proposal involves increasing the maximum allowable density in the B/R-MU zone from 20 to 30 dwelling units per acre(du/ac).The B/R-MU(Business/Residential Mixed-Use)Zone is intended for areas where business and light industrial uses are compatible with multi-family, single-family, or live/work residential development.

This zoning designation supports a mixed-use environment, allowing residents to live and work on the same site or in close proximity.The B/R-MU zone is primarily located along 9th Street,within both the eastern and western portions of the City. The sites identified in the Housing Element are situated east of Historic Downtown and generally consist of clusters of developable parcels or blocks. Specifically,the parcels are located east of Campus Avenue,south of 9th Street,and east of 12th Avenue. These sites are highlighted in blue in Image 9 below.

Image 9
, - [IT
,P;s4 401). Nic7.7., ,
• .T"'_+"_ ... t o. 0c7 a-- 1
}a' l si
1F1!
4 F t P� �r" f
This area has been identified in the Housing Element based on the criteria outlined above.

Many of the parcels are underutilized,consisting of industrial and storage yards,as well as aging structures.The area is strategically located near Downtown Upland and the Metrolink station, making it suitable for future residential development. It's important to note that the proposed increase in permitted density within the B/R-MU zone—from 20 to 30 dwelling units per acre—will apply to all parcels citywide that are zoned B/R-MU. This includes all parcels located within the previously mentioned Transit Overlay(TO) Zone. As stated, the TO zone retains the underlying B/R-MU zoning designation, which means parcels within the TO zone may either develop under the enhanced standards of the TO zone(including higher density and reduced development standards)or opt to follow the base B/R- MU standards,now allowing up to 30 du/ac.Additionally,this zoning modification will affect certain industrial parcels along 9th Street, between San Antonio and Benson Avenue (see Image 10). These areas were not included in the Housing Element's sites inventory because they are fully developed,have many active businesses,and there has been no indication of redevelopment interest from property owners.

Image 10
, � _ , y. � F rii -T l air. . _. . 1 It -- -•� _. - - 9St IiiiILT 9th't5t- aw MS _
„. . v, • , ill it L ., i • -.IL' ii • A 'Ll r'iL-J3 1 - Li E . .- k la 1 if -11 ,..4 11., .I .7yr. II rJ . rre r'r.
,,,ern" _29 —— _ - llRr.�.._`___ ail-.

I'M
ram, ~ 'l 'riff '�rip ..or. r r• f� ,s, 4 + 7 ap�•.if` 1 .�1�'.� �,, ysL� n f R7J [Fl LH7l I�8.'a all r -^i� - �4 . f IA S f d_ fly r

2. Rezoning parcels to Residential Multi-Family Medium(RM-30) The second proposal involves rezoning 60 parcels to RM-30 and updated the General Plan Land Use Designation of the parcels to Multi-Family Medium(MFR-M),permitting residential densities of up to 30 dwelling units per acre.The RM-30(Residential Multi-Family Medium)zone is designed to accommodate a range of medium-density multi-family housing types, including three- to four-story apartment buildings, duplexes, and triplexes, at densities of up to 30 units per net acre—excluding any City or State density bonuses. The parcels identified for rezoning, shown below,primarily consist of upzoned sites that currently allow for lower-density residential uses.

Location:The sites shown in Image 11 are located east of 11th Location: The site shown in Image 12 is located at the Avenue,north of 9th Street,and west of Bodenhamer. northwest corner of Grove Avenue and Arrow Highway, Current Zoning: These parcels are currently zoned adjacent to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.

Residential Multi-Family Low(RM-20). Current Zoning: It is currently zoned Residential Multi- Reason for Rezoning: The Planning Commission recently Family Low(RM-20). approved an 11-unit townhome project within this area. Reason for Rezoning: As depicted, the eastern portion of the Surrounded by existing multi-family development, these site is vacant,while the western portion is occupied by a legally parcels remain largely underdeveloped and present nonconforming commercial fueling business. The owner of the opportunities for future redevelopment. western parcel has expressed interest in selling the property for potential residential development.

Image 11
▪ �� iVrt&iti G Image 12
Iw �rf , P+�- I� . P _T..I•'• 11 .p��J .;y��� • r I. I�' / i *. . `�I J i/7 `.'.,6 tea,
�pp a \' ver,/Oft
' Cr a.,y,- tr
'',I.
r 1"2 ' i 4�
•
.+ . FT '
`i ._ ..: I . - _ fir. - -

0.,,T.-."-fir We.i� `- - •.,,ems:n�+a.-- ..-reT ✓' . a LI,..r ,
' '''' ' r.'' ll d liliiiiiiic 1146Aiteilif4 V142
P !I ar
O. 1
ea r 4 �„ "del 11 ;�PI �12
IMAT;JC' _ Eprrow-wy" " �"-.y
times --- - .._- _�.... ` ...-'
NoMmimimo
l®13r113I iiurint1Jin 11-11- Tllf ill '

Location: The site shown in Image 13 is located at the Location:The site shown in Image 14 is located at the southeast northeast corner of Campus Avenue and 14th Street. corner of 7th Street and 11th Avenue.

Current Zoning: It is currently zoned Public/Institutional Current Zoning:This site is currently zoned RM-20.The area (PB/I). comprises 4 separate properties under 3 different owners.

Reason for Rezoning: This site remains undeveloped, Reason for Rezoning: The westernmost property owner has presently operating as a nursery. The property owner has long expressed interest in pursuing a residential development. The expressed interest in pursuing residential development on the central parcel,in 2020,received approval for a townhouse-style site, with a particular focus on a potential senior housing apartment project shown below. Additionally, the City has project. received correspondence from the United States Army regarding the potential closure and sale of Thrall Hall, which Image 13 occupies the easternmost portion of the site. ` .._ 7,...
. ,. � 4.7
: C_ , a m s,v� :eP _ Image 14
nNo..; in
, .
_� Thadi[ ��-ui - _
.,3=, mil
_4,7 �0.)..
�. "_ Eaih t -E?KSt .�E 7th Sr
■'alit ..5- ' '.:'I ... _ R.__— . mi..... ' + 1 _1 CCCYYYr1--
- l� ny, s ■Y
1 !ix- mil- ' . ' i i rk - i I Iiii j,, 11 ';-: 1: 9 ;0-,_ , f-,.eiro - ,, . T
,:. ''s"41.4.,:,
I , mi 1:
tee.. , .G ' :11 i

Location: The site shown in Image 15 below consists of 15 Location: The site shown in Image 16 below consists of 8 contiguous parcels, and is located at the northeast corner of contiguous parcels,and is located at the northwest corner of 11 th Claremont Boulevard and Blanchard Place. Avenue and 8th Street.

Current Zoning:The site is currently zoned Residential Single- Current Zoning: Most of the site is currently zoned Light Family Medium (RS-7.5). Indistrial (LI) with 2 lots zoned Residential Single-Family Reason for Rezoning: This site contains some vacant lots and Medium (RS-7.5). aging single-family residential structures. Upzoning this aging Reason for Rezoning: The site is located within th mile of single-family housing stock provides increased opportunity for Historic Dowtown and the Metrolink Station. The site is housing adjacent to the College Campus that could be utilized currently RS-7.5 and contains some vacant lots and aging by faculty and staff. single-family residential structures.Upzoning this aging single- family housing stock provides increased opportunity for Image 15 housing adjacent to the College Campus that could be utilized "•iet __ ,-- by faculty and staff.
};,( 1 ,• } r am,:= ..
r- i71,!lJ :i ' i 1 Image 16

1.II On � �f7�!1 �o f.` } „ tr _9 ,= LH . -,— 'r „J.,
... -a 1"- Pi" 'Urn, qj I 1 '"'"'
rI-l..J1 7,
71IO0151p ..F. .. -,.t.,.-.-,---_.:',.' "ii.",.0•: ,) r1I6.,'7,-,.,;/A,i.,f,,.4..,.3i1&r-g•t':,_,--,.,'1:',,43./j.4 1l4 a
l
1 t_ s I-
r VV 1
---
Fr
* ' . e° ° : r ill w , 1;11 1• 0 44 Sulrere ..�`zic— 4 it iWWI _ a- >1.

Location: The site shown in Image 17 below consists of 3 Location: The site shown in Image 18 below consists of 4 contiguous parcels,and is located approxiamtly 300-feet north of contiguous parcels, and is located at the southwest corner of intersection of Campus Anvenue and 11th Street. Central Avenue and 11th Street.

Current Zoning: The site is currently zoned Residential Multi- Current Zoning: The site is currently zoned Family Low(RM-20). Commercial/Industrial Mixed-Use (C/I-MU).

Reason for Rezoning: This site contains mostly vacant space Reason for Rezoning:The site contains some vacant areas,aging with 2 single family homes.The property owner has contacted the buildings and is close to existing multi-family residenital.The site City and intends to develop the site, therefore upzoning the site is also near mulitple commercial/industrial areas and could will provide the property owner wil more development options. provide living opportunities near employment areas.

Image 17 Image 18
-. { tijn,sr -
• 1 I k �, A
1k�
Y I
Ufa i �i �' : .
_ . � _ .,_ r �.r •
re _ 7 _ f .. + yl i
EC'
M _ 11 ' I :1 n �n
yy y i a
r ] 1
7 i Al" A i ' \ , -1 II ,. i L. i' II ..#?-7 - .'". .".e..: .,i' ., : ',. , La -' ' e fill 1 4J.1, N 1W: 1-e,.,, 1 • _ .

At a density of 30 dwelling units per acre,the housing types tend to be moderately dense —Generally between 20 and 30 du/ac. Common housing types include townhouses which are typically 2-3 stories tall, share walls with neighbors with each unit having its own entrance and the units are generally arranged in clusters or rows. Low-rise apartments that are 2-3 stories are also common,which features include multiple units per building,shared entrances and shared common/open space areas. Duplexes and triplexes can also be built, which often look like a large house but contain multiple units and can be side-by-side or stacked. Garden-style/Low-rise apartments can be built. This housing type typically includes units arranged in clusters with primary entrances facing large, landscaped areas with shared open space.

As an example project,in 2020,the Planning Commission approved the Mesa Court apartments,a 3-story townhouse style apartment project at 24 du/ac on an existing RM-30 lot(Image 19 and 20).In addition,the Planning Commission recently approved the City Ventures project,which included 32 for-sale townhomes,at approximately 30 du/ac(Image 21 and 22).

Image 19(Mesa Court site plan)
-._ _:.,....!..____. .,.,._ .:4....-ifirowitimalfrtik,:,--....\ r.1 ifir,L7,2t A s Io L2f
.:
s. ••0 .. �coes,, v,f.: A ono i9 i LJ\ w
ka "'Pi?
'to?'-C}.,� u. �� l'e b � Vim"
-{ry.44� �, �.�, �riiii
11111 4 J"169USPAuItl`
ter 111 till e�
111111: ii-„If libli 9 rii'll°11, :

Image 20(Mesa Court Apartments)
•IIn
o..in .. ri_._m
I,•t41
Jhuman I El CI
�11 I -- - I _, - -1
.,_ : _
_._11- -
_
Image 21 (City Ventures)
EXISTING ALLEY -
F A MN FLOW, gLD6
.>r
.E• y -� ELF
I o'ur mi,...i .„-
; -7=6 ,. J� f EXISTING
..-. ,,RR■r®0=.®i.O'INE UM' 'Iia®'®ism ®IM.® BUILDING ME vaita.

PROJECT € r '. I - ,
ENTRY e' x I t ' I ,
Li'
';' 111,111:1!FITIIi . ® 1II:. �'. . tm=- v' ® II! ® r Milli SIII I -__- L Cilia�,T-- 1.„' -.'
Barr za- -
.,_.. lIfaIPG > I]__11�J T ��� LURID' PACs N ♦ S‘.
/{?s, m N. FIRST AVE. . S cv CARY o t Pl .

Image 22 (City Ventures)
NE mi gg 1ii, N Flo
NO IN ■ ■. / N
Illi ii 1 - lfr41.' illi
'kJ/ ,1 7: , rig
- x
C.Density: 20 Dwelling units per acre(du/ac)
The Housing Element includes the rezone or upzone of 8 parcels(shown in table)to Residential Multi-Family Low (RM-20),allowing residential densities up to 20 du/ac and updating the General Plan Land Use Designations to Multi- Family Low(MFR-L). Within the RM-20 zone,projects are generally being constructed between 10 and 20 du/ac.

The City has approved numerous projects at this density,primarily consisting of townhouses which include attached units with private entrances, typically 2 — 3 stories tall and arranged in rows or small clusters. Recently approved projects of this nature include the"7th Street Apartments"which consist of 60,2-and 3-story apartments,at 20 du/ac (Image 23) and the "Sage at 9t"'project, which consists of 71 2-story townhomes, at 15 du/ac (Image 24 and 25).

Another housing type could include Small-Lot Single-Family Homes,detached houses on smaller lots than traditional suburbs often with reduced setbacks and smaller yards,similar to the Rose Glen Specific Plan project currently under construction(Image 26), which consists of 64 units at 13.2 du/ac. In addition, similar to the above zones, duplexes and triplexes and low-rise apartments are also possible.

Location: The site shown in Image 23 below consists of 3 Location: The site shown in Image 24 is located south of E. 9th contiguous parcels, and is located at the southeast corner of Street,between 12 Avenue and 13th Avenue.

Benson Avenue and 9th Street. Current Zoning: Currently, the parcels are zoned Residential Current Zoning: The site is currently zoned Light Industrial Single-Family Medium(RS-7.5). (LI). Reason for Rezoning: This site is surrounded by multi-family Reason for Rezoning: and contains a contractors buiness and residenital uses. The area is strategically located near Downtown storage yard. The site is in cose proximty to the TO zone and Upland and the Metrolink station, making it suitable for future provides additional oppurtunity to provide housing near public residential development. trasportation and near job centers.

Image 23 Image 24
-. , 3ii:711..i. 4r....-... .) ,:. igri ., il,..- i ofio „,-,-, 4.,:i _ ,„_... , ,.., . , i ,.., ,..... - _ ir.1 ,..., ,..,, ,,„-,_ " - 5 ,... .'" .. - , ;17
" .., C '''' IA ..0
., 1I. r 'i. -_ , rri,, ,, 1 .41.-101 KJ rel.. ` "i e _le
ti.
r eii - AlTt i:, Q

1. ''• ` ■® - .,. _ Mir : m_1:APT t 4 f rvi a r • .ir 1 - I l' ■._ � : 1 1�'7M �1 - i L . 1» 1� ' ��■ L— L J j, I: �-1 I ,4 t, r
r
Example Projects
Image 25 (7th Street Apartments)
— —fr!
., # s

Image 26(Sage at 9th Townhomes)
'i ''ailiq..1"`; . ,.-__IV '''6."11:11 1.1"1111-411- EigEm..... 111
ail kig
/ - e- �. ,� ma' s , +
I =Ali I. t • . . j r) - irf. . j,:,1 ii.

I
-; it_ - - - - ' ��` _ of r,_ " , ��� _ r ' -AIM
IN. i� g +ram F ; . ,x ,,:l. ^R 'r_ i Silt ilfil. -- •• .a_,��iL - ,�. - rr ae
ail Mt rillr _ I are an......-. - .,-., I .1.- Image 27(Sage at 9th Townhomes)
1 __ --.Wg- -- - - -- -
_..~
�• .. ' k'.
p:- . __,jr___„..,,,,
,__ .
. ...,. :::. A ---_,€____. ... ._,„
Image 28 (Rose Glen)
I aP
, ir
t hI
a Ci , '�
1 W
. i .n ,. a t `-- dt i.

ROSE—GUN ..TTr ` ' ��—
f
D.Density: Single-family Residential: 10 Dwelling Units an Acre The project proposes rezoning two parcels,totaling 15.5 acres,to the Residential Single-Family Medium(RS-4) designation(as shown in the Table),which permits residential densities of up to 10 units per acre—allowing for a maximum of 169 units. Or,as recommended by the Planning Commission,as mentioned below,one parcel would be rezoned to RS-10 allowing 4 units per acre,reducing the total number of units to approximately 100 units across both sites. The General Plan Land Use Designations will be updated to Single-Family Medium(SFR-M) if the RS-4 zone is implemented. The RS-4 zone is intended for lots with a minimum size of 4,000 square feet, each accommodating one single-family home along with typical accessory structures. These parcels may also be developed under a specific plan,which could incorporate features such as gated communities, shared open space amenities,private streets,and supporting infrastructure.For example,the Planning Commission recently reviewed

the Villa Serena Specific Plan(Image 31),a project consisting of 65 single-family homes on lots of approximately 3,500 square feet.Although slightly smaller than the RS-4 minimum,the Villa Serena Specific Plan represents the kind of development that could be feasible on these parcels.

Location:The site shown in Image 29 below consists of 10-acre Location: The site shown in Image 30 below consists of 5-acre parcel,located at the south-west corner of Campus Avenue and parcel, located at the west end of 24th Street. 21' Street. Current Zoning: This property is currently zoned Residential Current Zoning: The property is currently zoned Residential Single-Family Low (RS-15) Single-Family Low (RS-20). Reason for Rezoning: The site is currently vacant and Reason for Rezoning:The site currently contains an equestrian underutilized. It is located adjacent to an existing single-family use, and is surrounded by single-family uses to the north, south residential neighborhood, within the Residential Single-Family and west. The site proximaty to the Colonies Crossroads Low(RS-15)to the east. shopping center makes for an ideal location for additional housing opputnities north of the 210-freeway.

Planning Commission: The Planning Commission
reccomended that this site be reduced from RS-4 to RS-10, which is proposed in the Resolution and Ordinance.The City Council may approve of the reccomendation, or approve the modifications as orginally proposed. The City Counicl can also consider rexoning this property to RS-7.5.

Image 29 Image 30 r
A 'yam :,,or: �+ � ' _-
M. s �� �y ry
N411.11Mr•TinP. a1;16Laimplirr-. •

17. - p40.7-Al : .!r.7411: :„.1
l .
)1
• ' \ I - r. nrtfigirr
_ _ , .
.__Y _ __. I. iII-.:I
..rL
- - t 1 , , -,...in ir _ - •
�. _ ,.... , i . J
k �� 9 • :Ili
1614GIB ,, Ori;, - - 10/-1`r''' ,44 0 . i NU . ka e _ y' .-- -r7alt f�J+ ■rt - G ii� �i __;„ q_iixl
k. 6 , ‘,--4,
�y �, =� NCIFJi

4. 1 v 7
orkier4. 1--.- . A •,. "
': t-..--AllarlITIJI6A,'

Image 31—Villa Serena Specific Plan
--
frzif„_
_- _
• ;:..=
f�'
- " ' -- e-.'
0 111.-
/
_if-
y
\®
General Plan Text Amendments
As required by General Plan Policy LU-1.2, certain modifications to the General Plan Land Use Element to ensure existing and future zoning designations correspond to the permitted density and intensity ranges as listed in the Land Use Element.The modifications are included as Exhibit C to the Resolution(Attachment A)in a redline and codified version,and are summarized here:

1. Modification to Table LU-1 General Plan Land Use Designations to increase the permitted density of the B/R-MU land use designation, matching the density increase in the B/R-MU zone. This modification is shown in Image 32,below.

Image 32
Gravel\Line — —
Mixed-Use
Business;Residential Mixed-Use 30 20 0.5
Commercial/Residential Mixed-Use 20 1.0
Commercial/Industrial Mxed-Use -- 1.0
Commercial'Office Mixed-Use 1.5
Special/Institutional
Institutional — -0.5

2. In addition to the density modification to Table LU-1, the description of the BR-MU land use designation has been changed to reflect the new density, shown in image below:

Image 33
Business/Residential Mixed-Use(B/R-MU)
Intensity: 0.5 FAR/ Maximum 30?8 dwelling units per acre The Business/Residential designation is intended for areas in which business and/or light industrial uses are compatible with multi-family or single-family residential_Supported uses include light manufacturing,assembly, processing, office,and multi-family and single-family residentiaL

3. With the Inclusion of a new Zoning District,the General Plan Land Use Element must be modified to include a corresponding Land Use Designation.Currently,the General Plan Land Use Map and Table LU-1 include the Multi-Family High(MFR-H) (30-40 du/ac) designation, but the Land Use Element does not include a description of that designation,therefore,the following has been added,as shown in image Image 34
Multi-Family High(MFR-H)
Intensity: 30-40 dwelling units per acre
The Multi-Family High designation supports residential development types including vertical and horizontal attached units (i.e.,stacked flats,apartment units,etc.) as well as higher density townhome style products.This designation is also typically located on major corridors.near major commercial areas.and near transit stations and opportunities (i.e.. bus lines). The purpose of this land use designation is to provide for a high density residential environment. The permitted density range is from 30 to 40 dwelling units per acre.

City of Upland General Plan Page Lt-3
Zoning Code Modifications
In order to properly implement the rezonings, the Zoning Code text must be amended to include development standards for the new zoning districts,RM-40 and the TO zone. Furthermore,the proposed upzoning to 30 du/ac is accomplished with a modification of the Zoning Code, as mentioned above. In addition, the Housing Element identifies, within Program 8, various modifications to the Zoning Code that will modify the development review process,as required by HCD.

UMC 17.04 Residential Zones
Modifications to UMC 17.04 include various modifications to implement the RM-40 zone and eliminate certain regulatory constraints to housing. Exhibit B to the Ordinance (Attachment B) contains all redlines of UMC 17.04, which are summarized below.

1. The first modification consists of the elimination of the requirements for Conditional/Administrative Use Permits for residential uses throughout chapter 17.04.During review of the Housing Element,HCD identified various regulatory constraints that prevent housing production,with the requirement for discretionary review (e.g. CUPs and AUPs)being one of them. Therefore, to be in compliance with Government Code Section 65583(c)(3),the City has committed to eliminating these constraints. See Chapter 17.04 within Exhibit B to

the Resolution for details. After these modifications are made, additional Zoning Code Text Amendments will move forward that address the remaining constraints identified by HCD.That said,staff has limited the text amendments to only those related to the proposed zone changes at this time.

2. Inclusion of the zone"purpose",under 17.04.010. Purpose of the Residential Zones, shown below in Image

35.Currently,the RM-40 zone does not exist,therefore,the purpose of the zone must be included within section

17.04 Image 35
iauuatapua5, aaun.,anti a..cu y anti auai t.0 tillr tin ay a anti Na►naiig. a ut,auva- 30 zone implements the Multi-family Residential Medium(MFR M)land use designation in the General Plan.

L. RM-40 Residential Multi-Family High. The RM-40 residential multi-family high zone is intended to provide areas for a variety of high-density multi-family residential developments at densities up to 40 units per net acre exclusive of City and state density bonuses. Housing types include three-to four-story multi-family housing projects,duplexes and triplexes.These lots are typically characterized by shared open spaces with lush landscaping; reduced front, side, and rear yards; and shared driveways and parking. The RM-40 zone implements the Multi-family Residential High(MFR-H)land use designation in the General Plan.

3. Inclusion of the RM-40 zone in Table 17.04-1 Permitted Land Uses in the Residential Zones.As mentioned, the RM-40 zone does not exist,therefore the zone must be included within necessary areas of the code section.

Table 17.04-1 identities and land use that are not permitted, permitted, administratively permitted, and conditionally permitted. The RM-40 zone has been included, and matches the land uses allowed, or not allowed within the other multi-family residential zones.

4. Establishment of development standards for the RM-40 Zone in Table 17-04-2 and Table 17.04-3 and a reduction of open space requirements for project exceeding 30 du/ac are proposed.As shown below,the tables have been modified to include standards for the RM-40 zone. These standards are slightly less restrictive, in order to allow for urban development within the RM-40 zone. This includes a reduction in the minimum unit size, an increase in the permitted height limit and a reduction in common open space. Currently, residential projects are required to provide 250 square feet of open space per unit,but,within more urban environments, like Downtown Upland,roughly 100 square feet per unit is common,therefore,a 50%reduction is provided for projects exceeding 30 du/ac,resulting in a requirement of 125 square feet per unit.

TABLE 17-04-2 PARCEL SIZE AND DENSITY FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES Residential Density Minimum
Parcel Area Parcel Width Maximum Floor Area Zone (min.) (min.) [1] Min. Max. Lot Coverage [2] RS-20 20,000 sq. ft. 100 ft. [3] — 1 unit per 35% 2,000 sq. ft. 20,000 sq. ft.

RS-15 15,000 sq. ft. 85 ft. [3] — 1 unit per 35% 1,800 sq. ft. 15,000 sq. ft.

RS-10 10,000 sq. ft. 75 ft. [3] 1 unit per 40% 1,600 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft.

RS-7.5 7,500 sq. ft. 60 ft. [4] — 1 unit per 45% 1,400 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft.

RS-4 4,000 sq. ft. 40 ft. [5] — 1 unit per 50% 1,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft.

RS-MH 10 acres 44 ft. 8 units per net 14 units per 60% — acre net acre[6]
RM-10 100 ft. 5 units per net 10 units per — 600 sq.ft. [8] acre [7] net acre[6]
RM-20 100 ft. 10 units per net 20 units per — 600 sq. ft. [8] acre [7] net acre[6][9]
RM-30 — 100 ft. 15 units per net 30 units per — 600 sq.ft. [8] acre [7] net acre[6][9]
RM-40 - 100 ft. 20 units per net 40 units per - 500 sq.ft. [8] acre [71 net acre[61[91
TABLE 17.04-3 SETBACK AND HEIGHT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES [1] I Develop- zone
Applicabl
ment Standard RS-20 RS-15 RS-10 RS-7.5 RS-4 MH RM-10 RM-20 RM-30 e RM-40 Standard
S
Primary Structure Setbacks(min.) [2][3] Section

17.10.060
Front 40 ft. 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft.

Side 10 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. [4] 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft. 5 ft.

Rear 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 5 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft.

Primary 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 35 ft. 16 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 40 ft. 50 ft. Section Structure [5] [5] f51 17.10.050 Height(max.)
UMC Chapter 17.05 Mixed-use Zones
Modifications to UMC Chapter 17.05 Mixed-use Zones are proposed to allow for multi-family residential densities at 30 du/ac and to implement setbacks within the TO zone. Exhibit C to the Ordinance (Attachment B)contains all redlines of UMC 17.05,which are summarized below.

1. Elimination of the requirements for Conditional/Administrative Use Permits for residential uses for the same reasons mentioned above.

2. As mentioned within the first strategy discussion to increase density to 30 du/ac,the B/R-MU zone will be modified to increase permitted density from 20 to 30 dwelling units per acre. The modification is included within Table 17.05-2.

3. Modification to the notes 3 and 5 under Table 17.05-3 to eliminate the setback increase in the TO zone.

Currently,projects in the mixed-use zones are required to provide 5-foot front and side yard setbacks. But, when projects are adjacent to major or secondary highways, freeways, drainage channels, or railroad rights-of-way,projects shall require an additional 10-foot setback. In addition,Residential uses fronting the street shall provide an additional 10-foot setback,which results in a minimum setback increase to 25 feet.The notes are proposed to be modified to provide an exception to residential projects within the TO zone. This modification will provide relief to the development projects, and encourage transit-oriented development, as called for by General Plan Policy LU-5.4.

UMC Chapter 17.09 Overlay Zones
Modifications to UMC Chapter 17.09 Overlay Zones are proposed to implement development standards within the TO zone.Exhibit D to the Ordinance(Attachment B)to the Resolution contains all redlines of UMC 17.09,which are summarized below.

1. Inclusion of the zone"purpose",under 17.04.010. Purpose of the Residential Zones, shown below in Image

36. Image 36
•
include Historic Downtown Upland, the Colonies, College Park, Foothill Walk, Foothill Benson Terrace,Wyeth Cove,Upland Crossing,College Commerce Center, and Park View.

D. Transit Overlay Zone. The Transit Overlay zone(TO)is intended to allow for higher density residential development in areas of the Cityl in close proximately to transit centers. The TO is specifically located within the south-west area of the city. The TO is intended to promote lot consolidation and new transit- oriented development as the area is within one-half mile of the Montclair Transit Center. § 17.09.020. Airport Compatibility Overlay Zone.

2. Establishment of the development standards for the TO zone is included under 17.09.050,and is included in red below,with some analysis in black.
§ 17.09.050. Transit Overlay Zone. The following additional standards shall apply for any new residential development in the TO zone.

The Density provided for below differentiates north and south of the Pacific Electric Trial as called for in the Housing Element.

1. Density:
a. North of the Pacific Electric Trail: 30 du/ac maximum. b. South of the Pacific Electric Trail:40 du/ac maximum.

To encourage lot consolidation, the maximum allowable density may only be achieved when parcels are combined to create a minimum site area of one acre. Within the Transit-Oriented (TO) zone, most parcels are small and narrow, posing challenges for standalone development.

As a result,consolidated lots are incentivized through higher permitted densities.Looking ahead, the City's Housing Element includes additional strategies to support lot consolidation.

Specifically, Program 15 outlines measures such as expedited project review and reduced development fees for consolidated parcels,among other incentives.

2. Minimum Lot Size: To qualify for the maximum density above, the project site must be a minimum of 1 Acre.

As mentioned above,the notes under Table 17.05-03 are proposed to be modified to encourage transit-oriented development within the TO zone

3. Setbacks:As provided in Table 17.05-3 Setback and Height Standards for Mixed-Use Zones.

As with the RM-40 zone,the proposed standards include an increase in the maximum building height and a reduction in open space requirements to further support urban, transit-oriented development. Specifically, the common open space requirement is reduced to 125 square feet per unit(50 percent of the underlying zone).The proposed building height aligns with the height limits established for the Citrus Transportation District in Historic Downtown, reinforcing transit-oriented development around transit centers.Additionally,parking standards are reduced to be consistent with those applied to mixed-use projects in the City of Upland,further promoting transit-oriented development. The proposal also eliminates the requirement for garage parking, in line with Program 8 of the Housing Element and requirements from HCD,which has identified garage parking as a potential constraint to multi-family housing production.

4. Open space:Same as required within the underlying zone,except that Common Open Space may be reduced by 50%in total area for projects exceeding 20 du/ac.

5. Building height: 55-feet

6. Parking for multi-family residential uses within the TD zone:

Table 17.09-1 Parking Requirements for multi-family uses in the transit overlay zone Studio and One-Bedroom Units 1 per unit;plus 0.25 guest spaces per unit,uncovered. 2 or More Bedrooms 1.5 spaces per unit;plus 0.25 guest spaces per unit,uncovered.

Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan Modifications
55 Dwelling units per acre(du/ac)
The final rezoning action involves a 0.48-acre parcel located within the Pleasant View District of the Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan. This parcel will be rezoned to the Citrus Transportation District, permitting residential densities of up to 55 dwelling units per acre,allowing for a potential total of 21 units. As shown in Image 37 below,the site is currently occupied by an auto repair business and older residential structures.Given the growing interest in development within Historic Downtown,the City has included this site in the rezoning effort to encourage redevelopment. Additionally,the adjacent property to the south has been approved for a 111-unit project at a density of 48 du/acre (see Image 38), and this parcel could potentially be incorporated into that development, or another housing type could be built. Following this rezoning,the Planning Division will initiate updates to the Specific Plan to establish revised development standards for the Citrus Transportation District, ensuring any future project on the site is compatible with the character of the Pleasant View District.

Image 37 Image 38
Jam' �� i
--y
� I ✓ n �
.'• � 11_11 -
I - -
v
714
®
•
Historic Downtown Upland Specific Plan Text Amendment
In addition to the downtown zone change, the Specific Plan will be amended to increase the permitted residential density within the Multi-Family/Senior Housing District from 25 to 40 dwelling units per acre.This change is intended to facilitate the development of a City-owned parcel located adjacent to the Gibson Senior Center (Image 39).

Although the City previously approved a senior housing project on this site,it was never constructed. By increasing the allowable density, the City aims to attract new development opportunities and better support the realization of senior housing on this underutilized property.

Image 39
.71;z t - a I ' - ' .r - ' I r Vr .' I `i r 4 7i i. .ie 1 .... .__.___
r � q6S� �
• T Y I� •1r1•r• ;
■- - -- ; .d i---, �.
•
` � ..
- •..7 7 • 4 t: ' "4--""r ,
" •K
1 IP F. .1 1.1 ile;
!WV. � .
i'r - :1 ni: , ,
A !. 3ff !
J it
. Yr : !"r'MI ME in NMI illrilli' .

S
Legal non-conforming status l
Properties chosen for rezone were selected to minimize the creation of legal non-conforming uses to the maximum extent feasible. However, the proposed zoning changes will result in certain properties becoming legal non- conforming uses, primarily existing industrial sites that are proposed to be rezoned from industrial to residential designations. These properties are generally recognized as legally established uses of land, buildings, or structures that were in existence prior to the adoption of the zoning change and may continue to operate as such.However,non- conforming uses are subject to regulations under Upland Municipal Code (UMC) Chapter 17.31, which includes amortization provisions.

Under these provisions, non-residential uses located within newly designated residential zones are permitted to continue operations for a period of 10 years, after which they must cease. The City is required to provide affected property owners with written notice at least five years before the date by which the use must be removed or altered, and annually thereafter until the end of the five-year notification period. This means that starting five years after the zoning changes are adopted, the Planning Division must issue yearly notices to applicable property owners to implement the amortization schedule. Additionally,the City Manager or their designee has the authority to grant an extension of the amortization period following a public hearing.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
A Program EIR for the General Plan Update(State Clearinghouse Number 2012041006)was certified by the City on September 28,2015.The certified GPU EIR evaluated potentially significant effects for the following environmental areas of potential concern:(1)Land Use;(2)Population,Housing,and Employment;(3)Aesthetics;(4)Transportation and Traffic;(5)Air Quality;(6)Greenhouse Gas Emissions;(7)Noise;(8)Geology and Soils;(9)Cultural Resources; (10) Biological Resources; (11) Agriculture and Forestry Resources; (12) Mineral Resources (13) Hydrology and Water Quality;(14)Hazards and Hazardous Materials;(15)Water Supply;(16)Wastewater;(17)Fire Protection;(18) Police Protection;(19)School Facilities;(20)Parks and Recreational Facilities;(21)Solid Waste;and(22)Electricity and Natural Gas. Of these 22 environmental subject areas, it was determined that there would be significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality relative to short-term construction emissions, long-term mobile and stationary source emissions, and cumulative impacts. For the areas in which environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable,even with the implementation of mitigation measures,a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093. The previously certified GPU EIR is available at https://www.uplandca.gov/general-plan-map .

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)(Cal.Code Regs.,Title 14,§ 15162 and§ 15164),after an EIR has been certified for a project,if some minor technical changes to the previously certified EIR are necessary, preparation of an Addendum to the EIR is appropriate. If the factors listed in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15163, or 15164 have not occurred or are not met, no changes to the previously certified EIR are necessary. The

analysis found that the Proposed Project will not involve new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects already identified in the Certified EIR, adopted in September 2015.

Therefore, an Addendum to the existing EIR is appropriate and has been prepared for the project; no further environmental review is required.

Additionally,on June 30,2025,Governor Newsom,signed Senate Bill No. 131,which became effective immediately.

This law introduced several amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including a new statutory exemption for Housing Element-related rezonings. Specifically,Public Resources Code Section 21080.085 provides an exemption for rezonings that implement the schedule of actions outlined in a jurisdiction's adopted and state-approved housing element. The City of Upland's 6th Cycle Housing Element has been adopted by the City Council and approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. As the proposed rezoning is consistent with and implements the Housing Element's adopted schedule of actions,the project qualifies for exemption from CEQA under this provision.

Finally, the proposed project does not result in any actual development within the City. as project are submitted, Compliance with CEQA will be required to ensure all future projects do not have any significant impacts on the environment.

FISCAL IMPACTS
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

ALTERNATIVES
Provide alternative direction to staff.

CEQA: Determine to be Exempt

RESOLUTION NO.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

UPLAND, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN ADDENDUM
(EXHIBIT A) TO THE UPLAND GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH#2012041006)

FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
PURSUANT TO SECTION 21166 OF THE STATE PUBLIC
RESOURCES CODE AND SECTION 15162 OF THE CEQA

GUIDELINES, FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT
PURSUANT TO PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE 21080.085; AND
APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 23-0001 TO

MODIFY THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF

PROPERTIES SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B AND MODIFY THE

GENERAL PLAN LAND USE ELEMENT AS SHOWN IN
EXHIBIT C.

WHEREAS, local governments are authorized by Government Code section 65350 et seq. to prepare, adopt and amend general plans; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65580 et seq. requires cities to update their Housing Elements on a regular basis; and
WHEREAS, Upland Municipal Code Section 17.49 requires that the City Council take action on General Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Zone Code Text Modifications and UMC Section 17.49.040 requires that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the City Council on such amendments; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive update to the Housing Element of the Upland General Plan for the 2021-2029 planning period has been initiated and prepared by the City of Upland; and
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2024, HCD issued a letter finding that the draft 2021- 2029 Housing Element is conditionally compliant and will be in full compliance with state law upon readoption and completion of the proposed rezonings; and WHEREAS, during the preparation of the 2021-2029 Housing Element update, the City of Upland conducted public meetings on February 25, 2021, June 22, 2021, September 23, 2021, March 23, 2022 and October 5, 2022 during which all interested persons were invited to offer testimony concerning the Housing Element; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on August 21, 2024, at which time it received public testimony concerning the Housing Element Update, and at the conclusion of the public hearing the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending City Council approval the 2021-2029 Housing Element update; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on September 23, 2024, at which time it solicited public testimony concerning

Resolution No.

the Housing Element update, and considered the CEQA determination for the proposed project and approved the 2021-2029 Housing Element update; and WHEREAS, after City Council adoption of the Housing Element, the City of Upland Planning Division began processing the required General Plan Amendments, Rezonings, Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments and Specific Plan Amendments outlined within Program 6 and 8 of the adopted Housing Element, including environmental documents for the project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Division on July 7, 2025, posted two (2) true and correct copies of the legal notice at the Upland City Hall Bulletin Board and at the Upland Public Library in accordance with the Upland Municipal Code Section

17.46.020; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Division on June 30, 2025, mailed the public hearing notice to each property owner including in the rezoning program, as well property owners within 300-feet of six specific sites indicating the date and time of the public hearing in compliance with state law concerning the Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Division on July 2, 2025, published a display ad in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local paper of general circulation, indicating the date and time of the public hearing in compliance with state law concerning the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on July 23, 2025, at which time it received public testimony concerning the Project, and considered the CEQA for the proposed project, and recommended the City Council approve the project with certain modifications; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland Planning Division on August 14, 2025, mailed the public hearing notice to each property owner including in the rezoning program, as well property owners within 300-feet of six specific sites indicating the date and time of the public hearing in compliance with state law concerning the Project; and WHEREAS, the City of Upland City Clerk on August 14, 2025, published a legal notice in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a local paper of general circulation, indicating the date and time of the public hearing in compliance with state law concerning the Project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland City Clerk on August 18, 2025 posted two (2) true and correct copies of the legal notice at the Upland City Hall Bulletin Board and at the Upland Public Library in accordance with the Upland Municipal Code Section

17.46.020; and
WHEREAS, the City of Upland City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on September 8, 2025, at which time it received public testimony concerning the Project, and considered the CEQA for the proposed project NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Upland hereby finds, determines and resolves as follows:

Resolution No.

Section 1. Findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Project:

Findings: Upland Municipal Code Section 17.49.060 provides that the City Council, before it may approve a General Plan Map Amendment, shall make a determination to allow the activity based upon the following findings:

A. The proposal is in conformity with the following General Plan Land Use Policies.

1. Policy HE-2.1: Housing Growth. Direct new housing growth into strategic locations that strengthen the City's economy, maximize existing and planned infrastructure, and foster the use and development of transit and multimodal transportation. These areas include Historic Downtown, Foothill Boulevard, Southeast Quadrant, and College Heights.

Fact: The proposed project implements the rezonings identified in the City's adopted Housing Element. These rezonings create new housing opportunities that, in many cases, encourage multimodal transportation, and new development within the focus areas, including Historic Downtown, the Southeast Quadrant, and College Heights.

2. Policy HE-2.2 Housing Diversity: Provide high-quality housing in a range of types, densities, and unit sizes that meet the housing needs of residents of all income levels and household types. This includes single- and multiple- family housing, senior developments, mixed-use projects, and transit- oriented developments.

Fact: The proposed rezonings provide a variety of zoning designations that will permit a broad range of housing types, densities ranging from 10 du/ac to 55 du/ac, that will meet the housing needs of residents of all income levels and household types.

3. Policy HE-2.4: Housing Incentives. Facilitate the development of a mix of prices, types, and affordability of housing products through the implementation of flexible standards, efficient permitting process, and other assistance.

Fact: The project includes Zoning Code Text amendments that will implement the proposed Transit Overlay Zone and RM-40 (Multi-Family Residential High) zone that include more flexible development standards.

Furthermore, the text amendments eliminate the requirement of a conditional/administrative use permit for residential development.

4. Policy LU-1.2 Permitted Densities and Intensities. Ensure existing and future zoning designations correspond to the permitted density and intensity ranges as listed in Table LU-1 of the Land Use Element.

Resolution No.

Fact: The project includes General Plan amendments that correspond to changes within the Zoning Code.

5. Policy LU-4.1 Infill Development. Encourage mixed-use, infill development on brownfields or underutilized parcels, particularly near public transit and within the historic downtown.

Fact: The project includes the rezoning of many parcels that are vacant, underutilized, near public transportation commercial amenities and Historic Downtown. In addition, the new zoning designation encourages new residential development and new mixed-use development.

6. Policy LU-5.4 Transit-Oriented Development. Support the development of multi-family residential and mixed-use projects around transit stations by allowing a reduction in the parking requirements or other development standards.

B. Upland Municipal Code Section 17.49.060 provides that the City Council before approving a General Plan Map Amendment, shall make a determination to allow the activity based upon the following findings:

1. Finding: The proposed General Plan Amendment is in the public interest.

Evidence: The amendment directly implements the City's 6th Cycle Housing Element, which is a state-mandated plan to accommodate Upland's assigned share of housing under the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Without this amendment, the City risks non-compliance with State Housing Element Law. The amendment allows for higher-density zoning which provides a mix of housing types for a variety of income levels and household types. The General Plan Amendment includes growth into areas near transit (e.g., Montclair Transit Center, Upland Metrolink), job centers, and existing infrastructure. Many of the rezoned sites are underutilized or vacant, making them ideal candidates for infill development that revitalizes neighborhoods without requiring new infrastructure.

2. Finding: The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent and compatible with the rest of the General Plan.

Evidence: The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent and compatible with the goals, policies, and overall vision of the City of Upland General Plan. It directly implements the City's adopted and state-certified 6th Cycle Housing Element, which is an integral component of the General Plan. The amendment supports key policies within the Land Use and Housing Elements, including promoting infill development, encouraging a diverse range of housing types and densities, and facilitating transit- oriented development near major transit hubs. By introducing new land use designations such as Multi-Family Residential High (MFR-H) and aligning zoning regulations with Table LU-1 of the Land Use Element, the

Resolution No.

amendment ensures that zoning designations correspond to permitted densities and intensities. Furthermore, it supports compatible land use transitions by focusing higher-density housing in areas near existing multi-family, commercial, and transit-serving uses. The amendment also includes regulatory streamlining measures such as eliminating discretionary permits for residential uses and offering flexible development standards—which align with General Plan objectives to reduce barriers to housing production. Overall, the proposed amendment furthers the City's long-range planning goals while ensuring cohesive and compatible development throughout the community.

3. Finding: The potential effects of the proposed General Plan Amendment have been evaluated and have been determined not to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare.

Evidence: The potential effects of the proposed General Plan Amendment have been evaluated in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and other applicable planning regulations and have been determined not to be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare. An Addendum to the previously certified General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared, finding that the proposed rezonings and policy changes do not introduce new or more severe environmental impacts beyond those already analyzed. The amendment facilitates orderly growth by directing new development to appropriate areas with existing infrastructure, services, and access to transit. It also promotes housing development in a manner that reduces reliance on vehicle travel, thereby supporting improved air quality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Furthermore, the amendment includes development standards—such as height limits, open space requirements, and parking regulations—that ensure compatibility with surrounding uses and mitigate potential land use conflicts. As such, the amendment supports the overall public interest while safeguarding the health, safety, and well-being of the Upland community.

4. Finding: The proposed General Plan Amendment has been processed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Government Code and CEQA.

Evidence: The proposed General Plan Amendment has been processed in full compliance with the applicable provisions of the California Government Code and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

The City has followed all required procedures for amending the General Plan, including public noticing, hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council, and preparation of the necessary environmental documentation. An Addendum to the certified General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15164, demonstrating that the proposed amendment would not result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously analyzed. In addition, the project

Resolution No.

qualifies for a CEQA exemption under Public Resources Code Section 21080.085, as it implements the rezoning actions identified in the City's adopted and State-certified Housing Element.

Section 2. Determination. Based on the findings above, the City Council of the City of Upland adopts a resolution approving the amendments as shown in the Exhibits A B and C, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 3. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act. The adoption of the General Plan Amendment does not: (1) trigger the need for subsequent environmental review pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines; (2) require major revisions of the Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the City of Upland's General Plan Update (GPU 08-03), Zoning Code Update (ZCU 08-03), Climate Action Plan (CAP), and the Cable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update (CALUCP), State Clearinghouse No. 2012041006 due to new or substantially increased significant environmental effects as demonstrated in the prepared addendum; or (3) result in any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that would require major revisions of the Final EIR due to new or substantially increased significant environmental impacts; and there has been no discovery of new information of substantial importance that would trigger or require major revisions of the Final EIR due to new or substantially increased significant environmental effects.

Additionally, on June 30, 2025, the Governor signed Senate Bill No. 131 into law, which became effective immediately, and which introduced several amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including a new statutory exemption for housing element-related rezonings. Specifically, Public Resources Code Section 21080.085 provides an exemption for rezonings that implement the schedule of actions outlined in a jurisdiction's adopted and state-approved housing element. The City of Upland's 6th Cycle Housing Element has been adopted by the City Council and approved by the California Department of Housing and Community Development. As the proposed rezoning is consistent with and implements the Housing Element's adopted schedule of actions, the project qualifies for exemption from CEQA under this provision.

Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.

Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions ofthis Resolution or any part thereof. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, or phrases are declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective.

Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately.

Resolution No.

PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 2025.

Bill Velto, Mayor
I, Keri Johnson, City Clerk of the City of Upland, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 8th day of September 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST:

Keri Johnson, City Clerk

ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF UPLAND GENERAL PLAN UPDATE (SCH NO. 2012041006) FOR PURPOSES OF CONSIDERATION OF

REZONING AS OUTLINED IN THE ADOPTED HOUSING ELEMENT
or tript---
04,
mums. Vir
Irtt •4 F
Lead Agency:

City of Upland
461 North Euclid Avenue
Upland, California 91786
Contact: Joshua Winter
Prepared by:

Michael Baker International
9635 Granite Ridge Drive
San Diego, California 92123
Contact: Shannon Liska, AICP
March 2025

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
-able of Contents
Introduction 1
Background 1
Project Description 3
Environmental Review Update Checklist Form 6 Addendum to an EIR 9
Environmental Review Update Checklist 10
Land Use 10
Population, Housing, and Employment 11
Aesthetics 12
Transportation and Traffic 13
Air Quality 15
Greenhouse Gas Emissions 20
Noise 20
Geology and Soils 22
Cultural Resources 23
Biological Resources 24
Agricultural and Forestry Resources 26
Mineral Resources 27
Hydrology and Water Quality 27
Hazards and Hazardous Materials 28
Water Supply 30
Wastewater 31
Fire Protection 32
Police Protection 32
School Facilities 33
Parks and Recreational Facilities 34
Solid Waste 35
Electricity and Natural Gas 36
References 38
2

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Introduction
The City of Upland (City) proposes to adopt zoning amendments to rezone 261 parcels within the City's boundaries to accommodate the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). The City, acting as the lead agency for the proposed Project (see Project Description) under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), has prepared this Addendum to the certified Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan Update (GPU), Zoning Code Update, Climate Action Plan, and Cable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Update (CALUCP) (GPU EIR, approved Project, State Clearinghouse No. 2012041006), in accordance with CEQA (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Title 14, Sections 15000 et seq.).

Background
California State law requires each city and county to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan. The Upland General Plan is the official policy statement of the City for use by the City Council to guide future private and public development, as well as the City's own operations and decisions.

State law requires that the City ordinances regulating land use be consistent with the General Plan. The City of Upland's Zoning Code, individual project proposals, and other related plans and City ordinances must be consistent with the goals and policies identified in the General Plan.

State law outlines seven mandatory elements that must be included in a General Plan, pertaining to land use, open space, conservation, housing, circulation, noise, and safety. Jurisdictions can elect to adopt additional elements to address relevant issues of community importance (urban design, recreation, public facilities and services, historic preservation, etc.), if desired.

The City's General Plan was adopted in September 2015. Various elements of the General Plan have been subsequently updated, including the Housing Element. The City of Upland's current General Plan consists of the following mandatory and optional elements:
• Housing
• Land Use
• Focus Areas
• Community Character
• Economic Sustainability
• Circulation
• Open Space-Conservation
• Public Facilities
• Healthy Community
• Safety (includes the mandatory noise component)
The State of California requires jurisdictions to update their Housing Element every eight years.

California Government Code Sections 65580-65589.11 outline the necessary requirements and components to be included in the Housing Element to ensure compliance with State law. 1

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Jurisdictions are required to submit their Housing Elements to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for review and for determination of whether the Housing Element achieves substantial compliance with State law. This can be done before or after adoption by the jurisdiction. Once HCD has determined that a Housing Element meets the necessary requirements, it issues a letter of substantial compliance. Throughout preparation of a Housing Element, HCD provides guidance and technical assistance to jurisdictions to assist them in achieving compliance with applicable State laws.

HCD and the California Department of Finance are responsible for assessing the new housing needs of different regions across the State. The City of Upland is located within the San Bernardino County Regional Transit Authority (SBCTA) region of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). The SBCTA region has a cumulative Regional Housing Needs Determination of 138,110 new residential units. The SBCTA has distributed these units to each jurisdiction within the region using a methodology that considers proximity to transit, employment, and opportunity—the RHNA. The City of Upland has been assigned a RHNA of 5,686 residential dwelling units, to be achieved for a range of income categories.

State law requires that a community provide a fair share of sites to allow for and facilitate production of the regional share of housing, assessed through the RHNA. To determine whether a jurisdiction has sufficient land to accommodate its share of regional housing needs for all income groups, the jurisdiction must identify "adequate sites" in its Housing Element. Such sites must be appropriately zoned, sized, and free of constraints that would inhibit future residential development from occurring within the planning cycle.

The City of Upland's 2021-2029 6th Cycle Housing Element was prepared in compliance with State law and in conformance with the Housing Element Guidelines as established by HCD. The Housing Element sets forth the City's overall housing objectives in the form of goals, policies, and programs, and allows for future development of new residential units to meet RHNA requirements identified for the City. The Housing Element identifies rezoning of approximately 157 acres on 261 parcels for a net increase of approximately 3,114 units. These units are counted in addition to the units available under existing zoning to help the City meet its required RHNA of 5,686 units.

The City adopted the 6th Cycle Housing Element update on October 24, 2022. After adoption, the City received another letter from HCD and submitted a round of revisions on February 13, 2024.

HCD provided another comment letter on April 12, 2024. The City then revised the Housing Element, met with HCD on May 1, 2024 to discuss the final revisions, and submitted the final Housing Element for review on May 20, 2024, following a seven-day public review period. HCD provided the City with a letter of conditional compliance on June 17, 2024. The letter states that once the Housing Element is re-adopted by City Council and the rezonings are completed as outlined in the Housing Element, the City will be in full compliance with State law. The letter did not request any further revisions to the Housing Element document. The Housing Element was re-adopted by City Council on September 23, 2024.

No changes are proposed to the 6th Cycle Housing Element with the proposed Project; however, this addendum analyzes the potential environmental effects resulting from the rezoning that would 2

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
allow the potential net increase of 3,114 new units, as identified in the Housing Element through implementation of Program 6. The 6th Cycle Housing Element is included in its entirety as Appendix A, 6t" Cycle Housing Element, for reference.

Project Description
The City of Upland is located in the westernmost part of San Bernardino County, California, approximately 35 miles southeast of the City of Los Angeles, at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. The City encompasses approximately 15 square miles of land generally bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, Grove Avenue and the Interstate 10 (1-10)freeway to the south, Rancho Cucamonga to the east, and the Los Angeles County line to the west.An additional approximately three square miles (1,969 acres) are located in one unincorporated area within the City's Sphere of Influence. Overall, the City's Planning Area encompasses a total of approximately 18 square miles. Neighboring communities include unincorporated San Bernardino County to the north, the Cities of Montclair and Ontario to the south, the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the east, and the Cities of La Verne and Claremont to the west. Regional access to the City is provided via 1-10, 1-210, and Foothill Boulevard (formerly State Route 66).

The Project affects a total of 261 parcels located throughout the City, as identified in the Housing Element. A total of 261 parcels would be rezoned or upzoned with the proposed Project. The existing maximum capacity of these parcels is 2,163 units. The new maximum capacity, based on the proposed rezoning, is 5,277 units, for an increased capacity of 3,114 new units. However, the Housing Element projects a reasonable buildout of 3,856 units on these parcels, which is 1,693 units greater than existing conditions. The reasonable buildout is the number of units the Housing Element projects as realistic development for each parcel.

A map of the parcels that would be rezoned under the proposed Project is provided in Figure 1:

Rezone and Upzone Parcels. The map shows the parcels to be rezoned and the rezoning action that would take place on each parcel. Of the 261 parcels, 244 already allow housing at some density, and the density would be increased. Seventeen parcels would be rezoned to allow housing where it is not currently allowed, at densities of 30 or 40 dwelling units per acre (du/ac).

The following zone changes are included in the proposed Project as provided in Program 6 of the Housing Element:
• Rezone or upzone 144 parcels 71.89 acres to allow residential uses from 20 to 40 du/acre (including parcels to be in the Transit Overlay Zone) (projected for 544 very low-, 376 low- , 414 moderate-, and 385 above moderate-income, totaling 1,719 units). • Rezone one 0.48-acre parcel to the Citrus Transportation District, allowing up to 55 du/acre (projected for 11 moderate- and 10 above moderate-income units, totaling 21 units).
3

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
• Rezone or upzone 43 parcels totaling 12.66 acres to allow mixed-use residential up to 30 du/acre (projected for 46 very low-, 30 low-, 64 moderate-, and 49 above moderate-income units, totaling 189 units).
• Rezone or upzone 8 parcels totaling 10.66 acres to RM-20, allowing residential densities up to 20 du/acre (projected for 163 very low-, 109 low-, 18 moderate-, and 16 above moderate-income units, totaling 306 units).
• Rezone or upzone 63 parcels totaling 45.58 acres to RM-30, allowing residential densities from 20 to 30 du/acre (projected for 487 very low-, 327 low-, 131 moderate-, and 116 above moderate-income, totaling 1,061 units).
• Rezone two parcels totaling 15.5 acres to RS-4, allowing densities up to 10 units per acre (projected for 85 moderate- and 84 above moderate-income units, totaling 169 units).

The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified parcels.

Each subsequent proposed development on rezoned sites would be subject to compliance with all federal, State, and local regulations, including a development-specific environmental review as appropriate, including the City of Upland General Plan and Municipal Code and additional evaluation pursuant to CEQA regulations, as required.

The proposed zone changes would not conflict with the City's adopted Climate Action Plan or CALUCP; therefore, those discussions in the GPU EIR remain unchanged with implementation of the proposed Project. No new environmental analysis is required or provided herein relative to potential proposed Project effects on such plans.
4

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Legend . -..

C.ty boundary . - ---
Other Jurisdiction -
i::

Rezone Parcels
Rezone/UpzoneTo? "�'"` ::::''•
MI R5 4 !Ipti /'d't1T2
RM-30 l
— Mixed-Use 30 du/. 11 • I -,F V �3 y1# y i '.'`• ' —40 du/ac A c yl" 'mar--.-- - . —
>ti ® 1i •per
- Citrus TransportaCon - " �'f+ °�;' t� 1 `?t .,' W 19eh St
'. "' 1:"-IA P1'_ 1. i$A410KriGki. ■ 0
V
p a..lrs Y.I .�. r
4447e 140 ? k
s 1 .Iwj@y * w A s 3..;, �' 1'�'^�,6 ems -' ' • 1 .�,t . 7 4 KF " • �1 as -- E.Baseline;Rd- - ...W16th Si h.. "''� o ~_ 1 ..I"- err "' II
o '; . Cotantry CIUI-
1 T ' z
• `
IS ,�rrvti 'tt Table
�. 1_•s k a +is
,� . }M ~
sd ° i
'-— - - - ' ' E Foothill Blvd - - - m� M,,.. ' - ��^ IN Foothill Blvd
. i L. _ �' .- - - .. oothlll Blvd'. -, yet "i' -tel
• r mon1 la ■�. ex�.r.' •
s ` 1
College lii 11 ;!, .•
-ti IN Arrow Rte - Id Arrow busy Upland E Arrow Hwy—. •rnont ,1-:- :!' _
,' W'9th Si - E 9th Si t r
` - el -•
W 9th St • Ca=
Moreno`St " 1l �I IN 7th St � ...'"E-7th St _ of
a.,
.. l _I E 6th
-.di
0 0.5 1 Figure 1 : Rezone and Upzone Parcels Michael Baker 0 Miles

INTERNATIONAL

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Environmental Review Update Checklist Form
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15164 set forth the criteria for determining the appropriate additional environmental documentation, if any, to be completed when there is a previously adopted Negative Declaration (ND) or a previously certified EIR covering the project for which a subsequent discretionary action is required. This Environmental Review Update Checklist Form has been prepared in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(e) to explain the rationale for determining whether any additional environmental documentation is needed for the subject discretionary action.

1. Background on the Previously Certified EIR:

A Program EIR for the City's GPU (GPU EIR, GPU 08-03, Zoning Code Update 08-03, State Clearinghouse Number 2012041006)was certified by the City on September 28, 2015. The certified GPU EIR evaluated potentially significant effects for the following environmental areas of potential concern: (1) Land Use; (2) Population, Housing, and Employment; (3) Aesthetics; (4) Transportation and Traffic; (5) Air Quality; (6) Greenhouse Gas Emissions; (7) Noise; (8) Geology and Soils; (9) Cultural Resources; (10) Biological Resources; (11) Agriculture and Forestry Resources; (12) Mineral Resources (13) Hydrology and Water Quality; (14) Hazards and Hazardous Materials; (15) Water Supply; (16) Wastewater; (17) Fire Protection; (18) Police Protection; (19) School Facilities; (20) Parks and Recreational Facilities; (21) Solid Waste; and (22) Electricity and Natural Gas.

Of these 22 environmental subject areas, it was determined that there would be significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality relative to short-term construction emissions, long- term mobile and stationary source emissions, and cumulative impacts. For the areas in which environmental impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, even with the implementation of mitigation measures, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093. The previously certified GPU EIR is available at https://www.uplandca.gov/general-plan-map .

2. Lead agency name and address:

City of Upland, Development Services
460 North Euclid Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
Contact: Joshua Winter, Senior Planner
Phone number: (909) 931-4143
Email: [email protected]
6

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025

3. Project applicant's name and address:

City of Upland, Development Services
460 North Euclid Avenue
Upland, CA 91786

4. Summary of the activities authorized by present permit/entitlement application(s):

The project does not include any permit and/or entitlement applications.

5. Does the project for which a subsequent discretionary action is now proposed differ in any way from the previously approved project?
YES NO
® n
In accordance with State law (Government Code Sections 65583 and 65302), the City of Upland has prepared an update to its General Plan Housing Element. The updated Housing Element adopted by the City Council identified 261 parcels that needed to be rezoned to allow for increased housing. The proposed Project is the rezoning of these parcels as outlined in the adopted Housing Element.

6. SUBJECT AREAS DETERMINED TO HAVE NEW OR SUBSTANTIALLY MORE SEVERE

SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS COMPARED TO THOSE IDENTIFIED IN THE PREVIOUS ND OR EIR.

The subject areas checked below were determined to be new significant environmental effects or to be previously identified effects that have a substantial increase in severity either due to a change in project, change in circumstances or new information of substantial importance, as indicated by the checklist and discussion on the following pages.

VI NONE
❑ Land Use ❑ Population, Housing, and ❑ Aesthetics Employment
❑ Transportation and Traffic ❑ Air Quality ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions Noise Geology and Soils Cultural Resources Biological Resources Agriculture and Forestry Mineral Resources Resources
Hydrology and Water Quality Hazards and Hazardous Materials Water Supply ❑ Wastewater ❑ Fire Protection ❑ Police Protection School Facilities Parks and Recreational Facilities Solid Waste Electricity and Natural Gas
7

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
DETERMINATION:

On the basis of this analysis, Planning & Development Services has determined that:

Z No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, the previously adopted ND or previously certified EIR is adequate.
❑ No substantial changes are proposed in the project and there are no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous EIR or ND due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Also, there is no "new information of substantial importance" as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, because the project is a residential project in conformance with, and pursuant to, a Specific Plan with a EIR completed after January 1, 1980, the project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182.
❑ Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous ND due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). However all new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in severity of previously identified significant effects are clearly avoidable through the incorporation of mitigation measures agreed to by the project applicant. Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT ND is required.

Substantial changes are proposed in the project or there are substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project will be undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous ND or EIR due to the involvement of significant new environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Or, there is "new information of substantial importance," as that term is used in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)(3). Therefore, a SUBSEQUENT or SUPPLEMENTAL EIR is required.

Signature Date
Print Name Title
8

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Addendum to an EIR
CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 through 15164 set forth the criteria for determining the appropriate additional environmental documentation, if any, to be completed when there is a previously adopted ND or a previously certified EIR for the project.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a) and 15163 state that when an ND has been adopted or an EIR certified for a project, no Subsequent or Supplemental EIR or Subsequent Negative Declaration shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in light of the whole public record, one or more of the following:

1. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.

3. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or Negative Declaration; or
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previously adopted Negative Declaration or previously certified EIR; or
c. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
d. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Negative Declaration or EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.

CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) states that the lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR have occurred.
9

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(b) states that an Addendum to a previously adopted ND may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary. If the factors listed in CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162, 15163, or 15164 have not occurred or are not met, no changes to the previously certified EIR or previously adopted ND are necessary.

The following responses detail any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or"new information of substantial importance" that may cause one or more effects to environmental resources. The responses support the "Determination," above, as to the type of environmental documentation required, if any.

Environmental Review Update Checklist
Land Use
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that cause one or more effects to land use and planning, including physically dividing an established community, conflicts with federal or State regulations, conflicts with SCAG's 2012- 2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy goals and adopted growth forecast, conflicts with the CALUCP, or resulting in land use conflicts? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts associated with land use would be less than significant.

No mitigation measures were identified. It was determined that the approved Project would not conflict with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations, or result in land use conflicts.

Implementation of General Plan policies and actions and the Zoning Code update and CALUCP standards and guidelines as identified in the GPU EIR would ensure impacts relative to land use were less than significant.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Protect
The proposed Project would rezone 261 parcels, as identified in the adopted Housing Element, to accommodate the City's RHNA allocation as provided by SCAG. Rezoning would ensure that the zoning of affected parcels is reflective and accurate as identified in the City's Housing Element and that there are no conflicts between the General Plan and zoning classification of parcels.

Additionally, rezoning would ensure the City can accommodate the adopted growth forecast in SCAG's 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy. The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. Each individual proposed development on rezoned sites would be subject to compliance with federal, State, and local regulations, including the City of Upland General Plan and Municipal Code and additional evaluation pursuant to CEQA regulations, as required. 10

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects(direct or indirect)to land use, beyond those previously analyzed.

No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Population, Housing, and Employment
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in one or more effects to population and housing including inducing substantial population growth in the planning area, or displacing substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts associated with population, housing, and employment would be less than significant. No mitigation measures were identified. The GPU EIR noted that population projections would comply with SCAG growth forecasts and that future development would be subject to implementation of General Plan 2035 policies and actions.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would implement rezoning as identified in the adopted Housing Element, which provides zoning for the RHNA as allocated by SCAG. The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. The proposed Project would accommodate population growth as projected by SCAG for the City and region, and thus would not induce substantial population growth. The proposed Project would result in an increased residential development capacity of 3,114 dwelling units within the Planning Area. Additionally, the Housing Element includes policies and programs to ensure there is no displacement or net loss of housing units throughout the 2021-2029 planning period.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to population, housing, and employment, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required. 11

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Aesthetics
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that cause one or more effects to aesthetic resources, including scenic vistas; scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings within a State scenic highway; existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings; creating new sources of light/glare that could adversely affect views in the area; and/or creating new sources of shade and shadows that could adversely affect adjacent land uses? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to aesthetics would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures AES-1 through AES-3, in addition to compliance with the General Plan policies,the Zoning Code update, CALUCP standards and guidelines, and the City's Lighting Ordinance. Mitigation measures AES-1 through AES-3 were included to reduce potential impacts associated with the visual character of development and its immediate surroundings. The GPU EIR noted that since the exact nature of future development is unknown, individual projects may require site-specific evaluation of impacts to aesthetics on a case-by-case basis, pursuant to CEQA requirements. Furthermore, additional mitigation measures may be needed at the time of development depending on a future development's location, nature, and project design.

Mitigation measures identified to reduce potential impacts to aesthetic resources are as follows:

AES-1 For future development located in or immediately adjacent to residentially zoned properties, construction documents shall include language that requires all construction contractors to strictly control the staging of construction equipment and the cleanliness of construction equipment stored or driven beyond the limits of the construction work area. Construction equipment shall be parked and staged within the project site, as distant from the residential use, as reasonably possible.

Staging areas shall be screened from view from residential properties.

AES-2 Construction documents shall include language requiring that construction vehicles be kept clean and free of mud and dust prior to leaving the development site. Streets surrounding the development site shall be swept daily and maintained free of dirt and debris.

AES-3 Construction worker parking may be located off-site with prior approval by the City.

On-street parking of construction worker vehicles on residential streets shall be prohibited.
12

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. Any future development on the rezoned sites would be subject to City development standards, design review process, and any other applicable City standards regarding aesthetics. Additionally, as noted in the GPU EIR, individual development projects would be subject to project-specific development and planning review, including adherence to standards for community design and visual quality, and implementation of mitigation measures AES-1 through AES-3, as appropriate.

Subsequent development applications would be required to conform to zoning, design standards, and other regulations concerning aesthetic resources. Therefore, impacts relative to aesthetics would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated, consistent with that previously identified in the GPU EIR.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to aesthetics, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Transportation and Traffic
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that cause effects to transportation/traffic, including conflicts with an Applicable Plan, Ordinance, or Policy establishing measures of effectiveness for intersection and roadways; conflicts with the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program; resulting in inadequate design features of incompatible uses; resulting in inadequate emergency access; or conflicts with the performance and/or planned transit system serving the area and/or conflicts with adopted transit, bicycle, or pedestrian policies, plans, or programs? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to transportation and traffic would be less than significant with incorporation of mitigation measure TRA-1, as provided below. The GPU EIR noted that since the exact nature of future development is unknown, individual projects may require site- specific assessments of impacts to traffic on a case-by-case basis. Furthermore, additional mitigation measures may be needed at the time of individual parcel development depending on a development's location, intensity, trip distribution characteristics, and project design. 13

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
The mitigation measure identified to reduce potential impacts to transportation/traffic is as follows:

TRA-1: Prior to issuance of each Building Permit, future development projects that are determined through preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis (Policy CIR-1.5) to impact the specific intersection, shall make a fair contribution toward implementation of the following improvements. These development projects shall be required to contribute to the implementation of mitigation measure, including but not limited to those identified in the General Plan EIR, by the payment of fair share costs, constructing the required improvement, providing right-of-way, or other actions as required by the City.
• 16th Street (Baseline)/Benson Avenue (AM) Intersection: The eastbound thru- right lane shall be split to provide a separate eastbound right turn lane and optimize the signal timing at this intersection. Additional right-of-way shall be acquired to accommodate this improvement.
• 16th Street (Baseline)/Mountain Avenue (PM) Intersection: The intersection cycle length and splits shall be optimized to provide more time to the left turn approach.
• Foothill Boulevard/Mountain Avenue (PM) Intersection: The intersection splits shall be optimized to provide more time at the eastbound and westbound approaches.
• Foothill Boulevard/Euclid Avenue (PM) Intersection:_The intersection splits shall be optimized to provide more time at the eastbound and westbound approaches.
• 8th Street/Campus Avenue (AM and PM) Intersection: A traffic signal shall be installed at this location.
• 1-10 EB Ramps/Mountain (PM) Intersection: The intersection cycle length and splits shall be optimized at this intersection.
• 1-10 WB Off Ramp/Second Avenue (AM and PM) Intersection: A traffic signal shall be installed at this location. This has been recently completed. • 1-10 EB Ramps/Euclid Avenue (AM) Intersection: The intersection splits shall be optimized to provide more time at the eastbound and westbound approaches.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Protect
The proposed Project would not directly result in development that would have the potential to impact transportation/traffic conditions at this time. Any future development on the rezoned sites would be subject to additional project-specific evaluation of potential impact to traffic at the time of application. Additionally, as noted in the GPU EIR, individual development projects would be subject to project-specific development and planning review, and subject to standards including the above mitigation measure TRA-1, as applicable, and General Plan 2035 policies and actions. 14

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to transportation/traffic, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Air Quality
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that cause one or more effects to air quality, including increased citywide construction activities under the Project that would considerably increase criteria pollutants, and thus, violate Air Quality Standards; increased mobile and stationary source emissions which would exceed South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Air Quality Standards; creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people; exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations associated with carbon monoxide hotspots, which could exceed SCAQMD standards; or conflicting with or hindering the implementation of the SCAG's Comprehensive Plan Guidelines and the SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that air quality impacts would be less than significant relative to conflicts with objectionable odors, carbon monoxide hotspots, and the SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan. However, impacts associated with air quality violations and non-attainment criteria pollutants were determined to be significant and unavoidable even with the incorporation of mitigation measures AQ-1 through AQ-14 due to the magnitude of development expected by the approved Project. As such, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for air quality pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093.

Mitigation measures AQ-1 through AQ-14 were identified to help reduce individual development projects impacts to air quality, depending on the specific air quality impacts of the future projects at the time of development. Mitigation measures identified to reduce potential impacts to air quality are as follows:

AQ-1 Prior to issuance of any Grading Permit, the Development Services Director and the Engineering/Land Development Division shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans, and specifications stipulate that, in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403, excessive fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled by regular watering or other dust prevention measures, as specified in the SCAQMD's Rules and 15

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Regulations. In addition, SCAQMD Rule 402 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off-site.

Implementation of the following measures would reduce short-term fugitive dust impacts on nearby sensitive receptors:
• All active portions of the construction site shall be watered twice daily to prevent excessive amounts of dust;
• Non-toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 20 days or more, assuming no rain), according to manufacturers' specifications;
• All excavating and grading operations shall be suspended when wind gusts (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour;
• On-site vehicle speed shall be limited to 15 miles per hour; • All on-site roads shall be paved as soon as feasible, watered twice daily, or chemically stabilized;
• Visible dust shall not cross the property line;
• All material transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust prior to departing the job site; • Track-out devices shall be used at all construction site access points; • All delivery truck tires shall be watered down and/or scraped down prior to departing the job site;
• A construction relations officer shall be appointed to act as a community liaison concerning on-site construction activity including resolution of issues related to fugitive dust generation;
• Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent paved public roads and use of SCAQMD Rule 1186 and 1186.1 certified street sweepers or roadway; and
• Replace ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as possible.

AQ-2 All trucks that are to haul excavated or graded material on-site shall comply with State Vehicle Code Section 23114 (Spilling Loads on Highways), with special attention to Sections 23114(b)(F), (e)(4) as amended, regarding the prevention of such material spilling onto public streets and roads. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the Applicant shall demonstrate to the City how the project operations subject to that specification during hauling activities shall comply with the provisions set forth in Sections 23114(b)(F), (e)(4).
16

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
AQ-3 Prior to issuance of any Building Permit, the Development Services Director and the Engineering/Land Development Division shall confirm that the Building Plans and specifications include the following measures to reduce VOC emissions resulting from application of architectural coatings:
• Contractors shall use high-volume-low-pressure (HVLP) paint applicators with a minimum transfer efficiency of at least 50 percent;
• Use required coatings and solvents with a VOC content lower than required under Rule 1113;
• Construct/build with materials that do not require painting; and • Use pre-painted construction materials.

AQ-4 Prior to issuance of any Grading Permit, the Development Services Director and the Engineering/Land Development Division shall confirm that the Grading Plan, Building Plans and specifications stipulate that ozone precursor emissions from construction equipment vehicles shall be controlled by maintaining equipment engines in good condition and in proper tune per manufacturer's specifications, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Equipment maintenance records and equipment design specifications data sheets shall be kept on site during construction. The City Inspector shall be responsible for ensuring that contractors comply with this measure during construction.

AQ-5 Electricity from power poles shall be used instead of temporary diesel or gasoline- powered generators to reduce the associated emissions. Approval shall be required by the City Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading permits.

AQ-6 Each individual implementing development project shall submit a traffic control plan prior to the issuance of a grading permit. The traffic control plan shall describe in detail safe detours and provide temporary traffic control during construction activities for that project. To reduce traffic congestion, the plan shall include, as necessary, appropriate, and practicable, the following: temporary traffic controls such as a flag person during all phases of construction to maintain smooth traffic flow, dedicated turn lanes for movement of construction trucks and equipment on- and off-site, scheduling of construction activities that affect traffic flow on the arterial system to off-peak hour, consolidating truck deliveries, rerouting of construction trucks away from congested streets or sensitive receptors, and/or signal synchronization to improve traffic flow.

AQ-7 Building and grading permits shall include a general note that restricts idling of construction equipment on site to no more than five minutes. 17

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
AQ-8 Proposed development projects that are not exempt from CEQA shall have construction-related air quality impacts analyzed using the latest available air emissions model, or other analytical method determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD. The results of the construction-related air quality impacts analysis shall be included in the development project's CEQA documentation. To address potential localized impacts, the air quality analysis may incorporate SCAQMD's Localized Significance Threshold analysis or other appropriate analyses as determined in conjunction with SCAQMD. If such analyses identify potentially significant regional or local air quality impacts, the City shall require the incorporation of appropriate mitigation to reduce such impacts.

AQ-9 Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the Development Services Director and the Engineering/Land Development Division shall confirm that the Building Plans, and specifications stipulate that proposed developments within the City shall include, to the extent feasible, the following measures:
• All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high efficiency/low polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping.
• All new residential, commercial, and industrial structures shall be required to incorporate light colored roofing materials where it would not conflict with other design objectives.

AQ-10 Future development projects within the City that include employers with 250 employees or more shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 2202, which requires the implementation of employee commute reduction programs.

AQ-1 1 To identify potential implementing development project-specific impacts resulting from operational activities, proposed development projects that are not exempt from CEQA shall have long-term operational-related air quality impacts analyzed using the latest available air emissions model, or other analytical method determined in conjunction with the SCAQMD (only for projects that are subject to a discretionary action and that require a General Plan amendment and/or Zone Change). The results of the operational-related air quality impacts analysis shall be included in the development project's CEQA documentation. To address potential localized impacts, the air quality analysis may incorporate SCAQMD's Localized Significance Threshold analysis, CO Hot Spot analysis or other appropriate analyses as determined in conjunction with SCAQMD. If such analyses identify potentially significant regional or local air quality impacts, the City shall require the incorporation of appropriate mitigation to reduce such impacts. 18

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
AQ-12 Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the Development Services Director and the Engineering/Land Development Division shall confirm that the Building Plans and specifications require signage to be posted at loading docks and all entrances to loading areas prohibiting all on-site truck idling in excess of five minutes.

AQ-13 New sensitive land uses such as residential, schools, hospitals, medical offices, day care facilities, and fire stations to be located within the City shall not be located closer than 500 feet to the 1-10 or SR-210 freeways, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in the CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. If new sensitive land uses cannot meet this setback, they shall be designed and conditioned to include mechanical ventilation systems with fresh air filtration. For operable windows or other sources of ambient air filtration, installation of a central heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system that includes high efficiency filters for particulates (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value [MERV] 13 or higher) or other similarly effective systems shall be required.

AQ-14 New sensitive land uses such as residential, schools, hospitals, medical offices, day care facilities, and fire stations shall not be located closer than 1,000 feet from any existing or proposed distribution center/warehouse facility which generates a minimum of 100 truck trips per day, or 40 truck trips with transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day, or TRU operations exceeding 300 hours per week, pursuant to the recommendations set forth in the CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. If new sensitive land uses cannot meet this setback, they shall be designed and conditioned to include mechanical ventilation systems with fresh air filtration. For operable windows or other sources of ambient air filtration, installation of a central heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system that includes high efficiency filters for particulates (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value [MERV] 13 or higher) or other similarly effective systems shall be required.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
Similar to that noted in the GPU EIR, the exact location, timing, and amount of future development on the parcels identified to be rezoned is not currently known. Any future development would be subject to additional project-specific evaluation of potential impacts to air quality at the time of application. Additionally, as noted in the GPU EIR, individual development projects would be subject to project-specific development and planning review, including adherence to SCAQMD air quality standards and incorporation the above mitigation measures A-1 through AQ-14, as appropriate.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to air quality beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.
19

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in one or more effects associated with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including generating GHG emissions by development associated with project implementation that would have a significant impact on the environment, and/or conflicting with an applicable GHG reduction plan, policy, or regulation?
YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts associated with GHG emissions and global climate change would be less than significant. No mitigation measures were identified. The GPU EIR states that the implementation strategies in the City's Climate Action Plan would allow the City to meet its reduced GHG reduction target. The GPU EIR was determined to be in compliance with the requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 32 which sets statewide GHG emissions reduction targets, and to result in less than significant impacts relative to potential effects of global climate change, in particular with regard to effects of global climate change on water supply, wildfires, energy needs, and public health.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
Similar to that noted in the GPU EIR, the exact location, timing, and amount of future development on the parcels identified to be rezoned is not currently known. Any future development would be subject to additional project-specific evaluation of potential impacts relative to GHG emissions at the time of application. Future development would be subject to the relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR as well as the City's Building Code and Climate Action Plan, which would ensure that impacts related to GHG emissions would be less than significant and consistent with those previously identified in the GPU EIR.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) related to GHG emissions beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Noise
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in one or more effects from noise, including generation of noise levels in 20

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
excess of established standards; generating or exposing persons or structures to excess groundborne vibration due to construction activities; contributing to an exceedance of the City's noise standards resulting in potential noise impacts to sensitive receptors; and/or exposing people residing or working in the project area to excessive airport-related noise levels? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that noise impacts would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measure NOI-1. The GPU EIR states that compliance with the CALUCP, Upland Noise Ordinance and Municipal Code, and General Plan policies and actions would help reduce potential impacts related to noise to less than significant levels. Furthermore, as noted in the GPU EIR, site-specific proposals would require individual assessments of potential noise impacts at the time of application and would be subject to the relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR as well as mitigation measure NOI-1.

The mitigation measure identified to reduce potential impacts related to noise is as follows:

NOI-1: During construction, the City shall require future developments to implement the following measure to reduce the potential for human annoyance and architectural/structural damage resulting from elevated groundborne noise and vibration levels.
• Pile driving within a 50-foot radius of historic structures shall utilize alternative installation methods where possible (e.g., pile cushioning, jetting, predrilling, cast- in-place systems, resonance-free vibratory pile drivers). • The preexisting condition of all designated historic buildings within a 50-foot radius of proposed construction activities shall be evaluated during a preconstruction survey. The preconstruction survey shall determine conditions that exist before construction begins for use in evaluating damage caused by construction activities.

Fixtures and finishes within a 50-foot radius of construction activities susceptible to damage shall be documented (photographically and in writing) prior to construction. All damage shall be repaired back to its preexisting condition. • Vibration monitoring shall be conducted prior to and during pile driving operations occurring within 100 feet of the historic structures. Every attempt shall be made to limit construction-generated vibration levels in accordance with Caltrans recommendations during pile driving and impact activities in the vicinity of the historic structures.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
21

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Similar to that noted in the GPU EIR, the exact location, timing, and amount of future development on the parcels identified to be rezoned is not currently known. Any future development would be subject to additional project-specific evaluation of potential impacts related to noise at the time of application. Future development would be subject to the relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR as well as the City's Noise Ordinance and Municipal Code, and mitigation measure NOI-1, as appropriate, which would ensure that noise impacts would be less than significant and consistent with those previously identified in the GPU EIR.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) related to noise, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Geology and Soils
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that result in one or more effects from geology and soils, including exposure of people and structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving fault ruptures or strong seismic groundshaking; resulting in substantial erosion or the loss of topsoil; and/or exposing people and structures to potential substantial adverse effects from ground failure, unstable geologic units/soils, and expansive soils?
YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to geology and soils would be less than significant. No mitigation measures were identified. Compliance with the City's Building Code, best civil engineering practices, and General Plan 2035 goals and policies would reduce impacts to geology and soils to less than significant levels. Future construction would be subject to compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System associated permit requirements and SCAQMD's construction emission rules.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. Similar to that noted in the GPU EIR, the exact location, timing, and amount of future on the parcels identified to be rezoned is not currently known. Any future development would be subject to additional evaluation of potential impacts related to geology and soils at the time of application.

Future development would be subject to the relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR as well as the City's Building Code, the National Pollutant Discharge 22

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Elimination System permitting requirements, and SCAQMD regulations, which would ensure that impacts to geology and soils would be less than significant and consistent with those previously identified in the GPU EIR.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect)to geology and soils, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Cultural Resources
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that cause one or more effects to cultural resources, including causing a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource; causing a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource; directly or indirectly impacting a unique paleontological resource or site; and/or disturbing human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to cultural resources would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measure CR-1. Mitigation measure CR-1 was identified to address potential impacts to archaeological and paleontological resources. Furthermore, the GPU EIR states that site-specific proposals would require individual assessments of potential impact to cultural resources at the time of application and would be subject to the implementation of relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR, as well as applicable local, State, and federal regulations that would ensure impacts to cultural resources would be less than significant.

The mitigation measure identified to reduce potential impacts related to cultural resources is as follows:

CR-1 In the event that cultural resources (archeological or paleontological) are unearthed during excavation and grading activities of any future development project, the contractor shall cease all earth-disturbing activities within a 100-meter radius of the area of discovery and retain a qualified archaeologist/paleontologist to evaluate the significance of the finding and appropriate course of action.

Salvage operation requirements pursuant to Section 15064.5 of the CEQA 23

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Guidelines shall be followed. After the find has been appropriately mitigated, work in the area may resume.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would result in additional land zoned for higher-density housing uses on 261 parcels in the City. No parcels affected by the proposed Project are currently listed on the National Register of Historic Places or California Register of Historical Resources. The majority of the parcels are outside any of the identified historic districts in the City.

The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. Similar to that noted in the GPU EIR, the exact location, timing, and amount of future development on the parcels identified to be rezoned is not currently known. Any future development would be subject to additional evaluation of potential impacts to cultural resources at the time of application. Future development would be subject to relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR as well as mitigation measure CR-1, as appropriate, and applicable federal and State regulatory frameworks. Compliance with such measures would ensure that impacts to cultural resources would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect)to cultural resources, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Biological Resources
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that cause one or more effects to biological resources, including causing an adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on species; having an adverse effect on a sensitive vegetation community, including riparian habitat and federally protected wetlands; and/or interfering with the movement of a native resident or migratory wildlife species? YES NO
El El
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to biological resources would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-4. Mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-4 pertain to impacts on special-status species, riparian habitat, federally protected wetlands, and migratory bird species. Per the GPU EIR, there are no significant wildlife corridors in the City.

The GPU EIR states that development is anticipated to occur throughout the City. Furthermore, 24

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
the GPU EIR indicates that site-specific proposals would require individual assessments of potential impact to biological resources at the time of application and would be subject to the relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR.

Mitigation measures identified to reduce potential impacts related to biological resources are as follows:

BIO-1 Prior to an application being deemed complete for future development projects in known or suspected habitat areas, a Biological Resources Assessment shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist, in order to determine the potential presence/ absence of candidate, sensitive, or special status species, as well as the presence/ absence of habitat that would support these species.

BIO-2 Prior to any ground disturbance and if deemed necessary by the site-specific Biological Resources Assessment, a Focused Survey of the proposed development site shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist to determine the presence/absence of sensitive plant and wildlife species that are federally- or state-listed as endangered or threatened, having moderate to high potential for occurrence on the proposed development site.

BIO-3 Prior to any ground disturbance and if deemed necessary by the site-specific Biological Resources Assessment, a pre-construction Burrowing Owl Survey of the proposed development site shall be conducted to determine the presence/absence of the burrowing owl. The Survey shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist according to the standard protocol established in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game [Wildlife], March 7, 2012).

If burrowing owls are determined to be present on the development site, mitigation for potential impacts to owls shall follow the guidelines outlined in the Staff Report, including passive relocation during the non-breeding season.

BIO-4 To the extent feasible, all vegetation removal activities shall be scheduled outside the nesting season (typically February 15 to August 15) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. However, if initial vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, all suitable habitat shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist prior to commencement of clearing. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 100 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete as determined by the biological monitor to minimize impacts.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would result in additional land zoned for higher-density housing uses.

However, the proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. Similar to that noted in the GPU EIR, the exact location, timing, and amount of future development is not currently known. Many of the parcels to be rezoned currently allow housing. 25

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Any future development on the rezoned sites would be subject to additional evaluation of potential impacts to biological resources at the time of application and would be subject to the relevant General Plan policies and actions as provided in the GPU EIR as well as mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-4, as appropriate. Therefore, impacts to biological resources would be less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures BIO-1 through BIO-4.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to biological resources, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Agricultural and Forestry Resources
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that cause one or more effects to agricultural resources, including conversion of important farmlands to a non-agricultural use or conflicts with land zoned for an existing agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract?
YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to agricultural resources would be less than significant.

The GPU EIR redesignated Prime and Unique farmland to new zoning designations that allowed for urban land uses that were consistent with the existing General Plan at the time. The GPU replaced existing agricultural zones with urban uses for surface water storage. The GPU EIR noted that there are no Williamson Act contract lands in the City and no land within the City is designated for continued agricultural production. No mitigation measures were identified.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project allows for revised zoning on 261 parcels as outlined in the City's Housing Element. The affected parcels do not have existing agricultural zoning or uses. None of the affected parcels are designated farmland by the California Department of Conversation's Important Farmland Finder.

The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. As noted in the GPU EIR, individual development projects would be subject to project-specific development and planning review, including adherence to applicable State and local standards for the protection of agricultural resources. Therefore, impacts relative to agricultural resources would be less than significant.
26

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect)to agricultural and forestry resources, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Mineral Resources
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that cause one or more effects to mineral resources, including the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State, and/or the loss of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on the Upland General Plan Land Use Map or official Zoning Map?
YES NO
El Z
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to mineral resources would be less than significant with the implementation of General Plan policies and actions. The Zoning Code update completed in the GPU EIR zoned the City's mineral sectors with the Mining (M) and Open Space (OS) classifications. No mitigation measures were identified.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites.

Rather, the proposed Project would allow increased residential density on 261 parcels in the City.

None of the identified parcels have a M or OS zoning designation. No changes to the City's existing mining uses are proposed.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect)to mineral resources, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Hydrology and Water Quality
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that cause one or more effects to hydrology and water quality, including violation of 27

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
any waste discharge requirements; substantially depleting groundwater supplies or interfering with groundwater recharge; altering drainage patterns or capacity; placing housing or other structures within a 100-year flood hazard area; resulting in people or structures being located in a dam inundation area; or resulting in inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts related to hydrology, drainage, and water quality would be less than significant with compliance with federal, State, and local existing regulatory framework and the Upland Municipal Code, and implementation of the General Plan 2035 policies and actions. Additionally, the GPU EIR noted that all future development would be subject to project- specific review to ensure it would not alter drainage patterns. There are no parcels in Upland located in a 100-year flood hazard area and, due to the distance inland from the Pacific coast, the City would not experience a tsunami or tidal wave. No mitigation measures were identified.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. The proposed Project would rezone specific parcels identified for housing and other uses to allow future development of housing at a higher density. No new parcels that were not considered in the GPU EIR analysis are included with the proposed Project. Future development would be reviewed on a project-by-project basis to ensure compliance with General Plan policies and actions, the Upland Municipal Code, and applicable federal, State, and local regulatory policies.

Thus, impacts to hydrology and water quality would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to hydrology and water quality, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in one or more effects from hazards and hazardous materials, including creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, storage, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or wastes; creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving 28

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
the release of hazardous materials into the environment; location on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, thus creating a hazard to the public or the environment; resulting in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area as related to airport hazards; conflicts with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; and/or exposure of people or structures to a significant risk involving wildland fires?
YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant. The GPU EIR did not include any specific development projects, so no specific type of hazard associated with the use of hazardous materials was identified. However, the GPU EIR noted that future nonresidential development in the City may require or engage in operations that involve the generation, use, storage, or transport of hazardous materials, and identified applicable General Plan policies and goals to minimize exposure related to the generation, storage, use, and/or transport of hazardous materials. The GPU EIR determined that the level of risk associated with the release of hazardous materials would be determined on a project-by-project basis and that compliance with appropriate federal, State, and local regulatory agency requirements would minimize potential impacts related to the release of hazardous materials.

The GPU EIR determined that there were no listed properties in the City on the Cortese List, compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.

Furthermore, the GPU EIR determined that implementation of the CALUCP, General Plan 2035 policies and actions, and Zoning Code update regulations would ensure that the Project would result in a less than significant safety hazard pertaining to airport safety for people residing and/or working in the Project area.

The GPU EIR determined that there would be no interference with an adopted emergency response or evacuation plan as no changes were proposed to the City's Emergency Operations Plan and General Plan goals and policies are designed to protect residents to the maximum extent possible.

The GPU EIR determined that compliance with the Uniform Fire Code, established regulatory framework, and Zoning Code update, and implementation of the General Plan 2035 policies and actions, would ensure that no people or structures would be exposed to a significant risk involving wildland fires.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on the identified sites. Four of the parcels are located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone as documented in the City's 29

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Housing Element update. Future housing development on the affected parcels would be subject to future City review for compliance with applicable Upland General Plan goals and policies, State law, and Upland Fire Code as discussed in the GPU EIR. The rezoned parcels currently allow housing or other urbanized uses. Thus, impacts to hazards and hazardous materials would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to hazards and hazardous materials, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Water Supply
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in increased demand for water supplies and infrastructure? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to water supply would be less than significant. Water usage and populations were projected to be within the accommodations provided in the 2010 Upland Urban Water Management Plan. Additionally, the GPU EIR determined that with adherence to General Plan goals and policies, Senate Bills (SB) 610 and 221, the Upland Municipal Code, and the Urban Water Management Plan, potential impacts associated with increased water demand would be reduced to less than significant levels. The GPU EIR states that individual development projects would be reviewed on a project-by-project basis to determine if adequate water supply is available for future development. No mitigation measures were identified.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on any of the affected parcels. No changes are proposed related to the City's Sphere of Influence, and therefore, no new parcels requiring future water service would be added to existing service boundaries. Many of the parcels that would be rezoned with the proposed Project currently allow housing. Future development on the affected parcels would be subject to project-specific review for compliance with applicable Upland General Plan goals and policies, State law, and the current 2020 Urban Water Management Plan to ensure that adequate water supply and infrastructure are available and/or provided. Thus, impacts related to an increased demand for water supply and infrastructure would be less than significant.
30

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to water supply, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Wastewater
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in an increased demand for wastewater services and infrastructure? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to wastewater would be less than significant with adherence to the General Plan 2035 policies and actions, City sewer connection fees, and the Sanitary Sewer Facilities Expansion fees. No mitigation measures were identified. The GPU EIR states that individual future development projects would be reviewed on a project-by-project basis to determine if there is adequate conveyance and treatment capacity as well as to ensure payment of applicable fees for sewage treatment. The GPU EIR indicates that areas of the City that are served by varying districts for wastewater treatment are charged a connection fee for the provision of public wastewater services. Additionally, the available capacity of the districts' treatment facilities is limited to levels associated with approved growth as identified by SCAG.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project affects zoning on 261 parcels in the City of Upland. No changes are proposed related to the City's Sphere of Influence and, therefore, no new parcels requiring future wastewater service would be added to existing service boundaries. The proposed Project would not directly result in development on any of the affected parcels. Future development would be subject to payment of applicable sewer connection fees, the Sanitary Sewer Facilities Expansion fees, and applicable goals and policies of the General Plan as identified in the GPU EIR to ensure that adequate wastewater services and infrastructure are available and/or provided. Furthermore, rezoning of the parcels is intended to accommodate the RHNA as provided by SCAG, based on approved growth identified by SCAG. This would ensure that the areas served by the affected districts have available wastewater service capacity. Thus, impacts related to an increased demand for wastewater services and infrastructure would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) related to wastewater, beyond those 31

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Fire Protection
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that result in increased demand for fire protection services and the need for additional facilities or personnel?
YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to fire protection would be less than significant with adherence to the Upland Municipal Code and compliance with the General Plan 2035 policies and actions. No mitigation measures were identified.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project affects zoning on specific City parcels identified to allow future residential development to meet the City's RHNA. No changes are proposed related to the City's Sphere of Influence. The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on any of the affected parcels. Future development on the parcels would be subject to development impact fees related to fire protection, the Upland Municipal Code, and applicable policies and actions of the General Plan as identified in the GPU EIR to ensure that potential effects on fire protection services remain less than significant. Thus, impacts related to an increased demand for fire protection services or the need for additional facilities or personnel would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to fire protection, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Police Protection
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in increased demand for police protection services and the need for additional facilities or personnel?
YES NO
32

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to police protection would be less than significant with adherence to the Upland Municipal Code and compliance with the General Plan 2035 policies and actions. No mitigation measures were identified.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project affects zoning on specific City parcels identified to allow future residential development to meet the City's RHNA. No changes are proposed related to the City's Sphere of Influence. The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on any of the affected parcels. Future development on the parcels would be subject to development impact fees related to police protection, the Upland Municipal Code, and applicable policies and actions of the General Plan as identified in the GPU EIR to ensure that potential effects on police protection services remain less than significant. Thus, the proposed Project would not result in increased demand for police protection services or the need for additional facilities or personnel. Impacts to police protection would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to police protection, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

School Facilities
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in adverse physical impacts to facilities within the Upland Unified School District and the Ontario-Montclair School District?
YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to school facilities would be less than significant with implementation of GPU policies. No mitigation measures were identified. The GPU EIR states that growth associated with the approve Project is anticipated to occur over several years and an increase in demand for school services would occur gradually; however, the specific location, timing, and amount of development that may generate new demand for school services is not currently known. To maintain adequate school facilities, individual development would be required 33

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
to pay statutory fees to the school districts. Pursuant to SB 50, payment of fees is considered full mitigation for project impacts.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
The proposed Project would result in additional land zoned for higher-density housing uses.

However, similar to that noted in the GPU EIR, the exact location, timing, and amount of development that would occur on the affected parcels is not currently known. Many of the parcels to be rezoned currently allow housing. The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on any of the affected parcels. Any future development on the rezoned sites would be subject to payment of school district fees and applicable General Plan policies. With implementation of General Plan 2035 policies and actions and payment of statutory fees, future development occurring with implementation of the proposed Project would not result in potential adverse physical impacts to facilities within the Upland Unified School District and the Ontario- Montclair School District.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to school facilities, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Parks and Recreational Facilities
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in an increased demand for parks and recreation facilities and the need for additional facilities?
YES NO
El El
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to parks and recreation would be less than significant with conformance of future development to applicable General Plan policies and actions. No mitigation measures were identified. The GPU EIR identified General Plan 2035 actions and policies that support the provision of parks and park access throughout the City to help meet the City's established parkland-to-population requirement of 3.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons. Per the GPU EIR, the City provided access to 287.5 acres of developed parkland, in excess of the 244 acres needed to meet the population anticipated by the approved Project.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
34

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
The proposed Project would not directly result in future development on any of the affected parcels. Since the previous EIR was certified, the City now maintains access to 286.1 acres of developed parkland, which exceeds the requirements of 3.0 acres of parkland per 1,000 persons.

The proposed Project does not propose modifications to existing land designated for parks and recreation and would not reduce existing parkland within the City. Furthermore, as stated in the GPU EIR, future development would be required to comply with Upland Municipal Code Section

3.44.020, which established a park acquisition and development fee on issuance of all building permits. Thus, with payment of applicable fees,future development occurring with implementation of the proposed Project would not increase demand for parks and recreation facilities or create the need for additional facilities. Impacts to parks and recreation facilities would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect)to parks and recreation facilities, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Solid Waste
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance"that result in one or more effects to solid waste, including the generation of additional solid waste and, as a result, incrementally decrease the capacity and lifespan of landfills? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to solid waste would be less than significant with the implementation of General Plan policies. No mitigation measures were identified. The GPU EIR states that future development would be required to comply with applicable State and local regulations as well as source reduction programs set forth in the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element to minimize operation waste and debris generated by new development.

Additionally, future development would be subject to City review on a project-by-project basis to ensure solid waste disposal services and landfill facilities would be available to serve proposed development.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Protect
Any future development on rezoned parcels would be subject to applicable General Plan policies and other local and State regulations to reduce solid waste generation, in addition to project-by- project review, as documented in the GPU EIR to reduce impacts to solid waste. Thus, potential 35

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
impacts relative to solid waste generation and the incremental decrease in the capacity and lifespan of landfills would be less than significant and consistent with those previously provided in the GPU EIR.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to related to solid waste, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required.

Electricity and Natural Gas
Since the previous EIR was certified, have there been any changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that result in one or more effects to electricity and natural gas, including increasing the demand for electrical or natural gas service beyond existing conditions and thus requiring expansion of the existing electrical or natural gas system? YES NO
Summary of the Certified EIR
The GPU EIR determined that impacts to electricity and natural gas would be less than significant with compliance with existing General Plan policies. No mitigation measures were identified.

The GPU EIR determined that the approved Project could result in an increased demand for electricity of 101 million kilowatts-hours per year, or approximately 0.12 percent, of the electricity demand at the time of the GPU EIR. Southern California Edison (SCE) maintains existing electricity infrastructure throughout the City and implements a distribution plan that is updated annually. The GPU EIR stated that SCE would not provide service to new developments unless adequate electricity supplies and infrastructure were available to maintain existing service levels and meet the anticipated electricity demands of the specific future development requesting service. All new development would be required to pay applicable SCE fees for service.

Additionally, all new construction would comply with energy conservation standards set forth in Title 24, Parts 6 and 11 of the California Code of Regulations and the City's General Plan policies related to conservation and energy efficiency. Implementation of these building practices would reduce the demand for electricity and impacts would be less than significant.

The GPU EIR determined that the approved Project would result in an increase in natural gas consumption of 19 percent over 25 years (buildout of the General Plan), or an increase of approximately 0.76 percent per year. Southern California Gas (SoCalGas) provides gas service to new development within the City boundaries. The GPU EIR noted that SoCalGas would not provide service to new developments unless adequate gas supplies and infrastructure were 36

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
available to maintain existing service levels and meet the anticipated demands of the specific future development requesting service. All new development would be required to pay applicable SoCalGas fees for service. With compliance with applicable SoCalGas fee requirements and General Plan policies, impacts to natural gas would be less than significant.

Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project
All future development on the rezoned parcels would be required to comply with Title 24, Parts 6 and 11, the City's General Plan policies (PFS-15.1 and PFS-15.2), and payment of applicable SCE and SoCalGas fees to ensure impacts to electricity and natural gas would be less than significant.

Since the EIR was certified, there have been no changes in the Project, changes in circumstances under which the Project is undertaken, and/or "new information of substantial importance" that would cause one or more effects (direct or indirect) to electricity and natural gas, beyond those previously analyzed. No additional significant impacts beyond those previously analyzed in the EIR or increases in severity of any identified significant impacts would result from the revised Project, and no new mitigation measures would be required. 37

Addendum to the General Plan EIR
Housing Element Rezoning March 2025
References
California Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. Accessed December 23, 2024. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ City of Upland. 2015. Final Program Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Update, Zoning Code Update, Climate Action Plan, and Cable Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Adopted September 28, 2015. SCH No. 2012041006. https://www.uplandca.gov/general- plan-map.

City of Upland. 2021. City of Upland 2020 Urban Water Management Plan and Water Shortage Contingency Plan. June 2021.

City of Upland. 2024. City of Upland 2021-2029 Housing Element. Adopted September 23, 2024. https://www.uplandca.gov/general-plan-map .

National Park Services, National Register of Historic Places. Accessed December 23 2024. https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/database-research.htm#table .

Office of Historic Preservation. California Historical Resources. Accessed December 23, 2024. https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/Listed Resources/?view=county&criteria=19.

Southern California Association of Governments. 2012. 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan. Sustainable Communities Strategy. Adopted April 2012. https://libraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/scag/2012-2035-regional-transportation-plan.pdf 38

Appendix A
City of Upland 2021 - 2029 Housing Element

SITE 1
General Plan Amendment
ugnt Induistrial/
_ - Industrial/ Business Light
usiness/-- Business pad •
z Industrial/
�sadentiaai T� Park Business
ixedUsel 20-30. j Park
Id u/ac .
9th St 9th St
-- -
- _ ._._
I- - : light
Business/ Industrial! . Business/ Residential Business . Civic/ Business/ Residential Mixed Use Park School Mixed Use
Residential
Mixed Use
Business/ ---
Residential
Mixed Use Light
Industrial! LI/BP to MFR L
Business BUST mss/ •
Park (8.49 Acres) Residential
i Mixed_Use
Hill::. , -
Light Light
ht
Business! Industrial! Industrial/
Residential Business
Business
Mixed Use pad Light pad Business/
Civic/ Industrial/' ResideC ial
School B Park siness Mixed se-U
Business/
Residential•Mixed Use
l \ 4-14
4-1, 4-10 &Vac f
4-10 Iliac\ / '
du/at :; ,
dufac !
4 14 l dLNaO€ . 4.10 -�-,i
- '--- ufa
4-10
dufac --
-_y Ir I duia i,
4-10 r--- 't 4-10 dufac I l dufac - — du/ac i du/at
4-10 -- •-
t du/ac f-
N • ro
4-10 5 4 10 ' 4-10 ` 10 dufac dufa6 du W E dufac - ,- dufac o
dufac �, dufac -
m — dufac 14-10 4.10 4.10 e 4-10 < 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 'du/ac dufac dufac c :dufac dufac dufac 'dufac dufac [ - - ,crow Hwy 8th St
Benson Avenue and 9th Street
From LI/BP (Light Industrial/Business Park) to MFR-L (Multi-Family-Low) (10-20 dwelling units per acre)
APN(s): 100762105, 100762106 and 100760101

SITE 2
General Plan Amendment
, .... .. —
Iridus[nal
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial Industrial end
Cog?irs- d0I - Iu dusCrial
,tr ] J Indusu ial_
aiklIfa p I I._.�
ICI° - ;Indus( Industrial
_ial I Irrdusteial
I
Indu i.1il
° zanw I -
I1:Juscrial Industri I
' !ndustrial
I'tdustr!al
20-30 • ' .
duac Industrial
C/I-MU and GI Industrial
to MFR-H , clustriai; ' Industrial
(5.06 Acres) • I
I :dLrstrlal
— nduscrial I
Industrial
': I Iridu ari„'
20•34 I`n'7Trri.
dulac �.'` a`I I. : I •ustr-lal
Arrow Route Arrow Route
4-10 4-10
rciall' du/ac dufac 4- 10
ntial i &Vac
Use i
4-10
emmercialf du/ac 4 10
residential dufac 10-20 10-20
Mixed Use — 4-10 dinar du/ac
4-10 dufac 10-20
du/ac I du/ac

4.10 4-10- du/ac
- afar 10-20
N 4-10 du/a c
_dufac
W E 4-10
dufac
•
Vorth of Arrow Route and East of Loma Place
■■ From Cl/MU (Commercial Industrial/Mixed -Use) and GI (General Industrial) to Multi-Family Medium (MFR-H) (Densities up to 40 units per acre)
APN: 100728133, 100728132, 100728146, 100728117, 100728119, 100728122, 100728123 100728134, 100728115, 100728118 and 100728121

SITE 3
General Plan Amendment
n
Dewdrop lJflrt+tl
industrial
iI.________ ...___._
St W 11th St
— - -- 4im.g1Lt.la hi/ • - - — I 10;M. Ei -- Industrial
Jght Light ft 81MA kligyurr.li`cr[iall
;usffial/ IndusrriaU o , Industrial isiness Business
Park Park �` I d sj InIdirttrial
-q In�ustnal Indus[rial
In° -
C/I-MU to MFR-M • -
Induserial
Light (1.80 Acres) c?nu,,,,e ��
lustrialf ' I aiDit
iciness Business `
Park Park - �� Irrodusdial_ Industrial r k I � F C -I
° Mad C1 Industrial Ind li—iial
4,°PP
rn� �r Industrial
IN lin:i .

Ik .frig
IFii #wa I - ----gli
—
L
is SPeciric Specific
Plan Plan
•H ghw
I, ci mmercial d _
Q
or h'u ;Industrial
ToIHigh.way c
C.omrner.cial r)
I Specific z
Plan
['-
1Nighwa}r
Cd fr.imer[ial
A I .rciarf Industrial
•Industrial
Highway • d duke
F ix:o-Use
S�lanIc Specific Specific Cammerr31 dulac Iti Plan
Arrow Route Arrow Route
Highway -- 4-10 4-10 L
Commercialf dufac
Co I 1 H Highway•.
alal du/ac du/a�
Residential
Commeraa,
N Highway.. Mixed use Commercial/
Contmetcial --Residential ¢ 10
E I Ni71-.:... . Fixed Use dufac
du/ac .

S ! I d-11}
1 .., dufac
East of N. Central Avenue, between Arrow Route and W. 11th Street From Oil-MU (Commercial/Industrial Mixed-Use) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN: 100730111, 100730110, 100730109 and 100730108

SITE 4
General Plan Amendment
11111111111
•
r I
CI-MU to
e .I MFR-H Industrial
Mixed rntlusrrl, (0.55
' Acres) —
Industrial
eom, rcIal/
Ilnustregi
r
Industrial
Ind
N
W±E us.rrdl
1 S
s.r
- I
South of 11' Street, East of N. Central Avenue
From Oil-MU (Commercial/Industrial Mixed-Use) to MFR-H (Multi-Family High) APN: 100729108
rage 34C of 520

SITE 5
General Plan Amendment
CMC HammierTtrraw.• lost tutiana
11 Institute oval
Specific 5
Plan
lzt
155
institutional
1 rtr
C3 specific
Plan
n SFR-M and
El barrio Park Public/Institutional
(PB/I)
i! to MFR-M
_ (3.92 Acres)
• / ',4-10
1 /
• ,� Lea l
4-10�/ L
.dufac 4. ,/ —
lu ac /I
{ I
4-10
• dulac
y4-1 4-1 I 10 — --
ufac ufac II dufac Specific
I• 4 40 Plan
_ dufa ii
Specific
�� ',4-101 4-1 Il c�ufarc Specific P lah dufacll �tlac II 11 I Plan
L
. 4-10I II --4-iC� -------- ---- ----
;` dufac --- duly _-----
• -
Specific
Plan - • -
Park/Open _ -
N Space
WE
S
Northeast corner of Blanchard Place and Claremont Boulevard ■■ From SFR-M (Single-Family Medium) and PB/I (Public/Institutional) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) Densities up to 30 units per acre
APN(s): 100736205, 100736203, 100736202, 100736215, 100736214, 100736208, 100736213, 100736207, 100736210, 100736211, 100736209, 100736206, 100736204, 100736201

SITE 6
General Plan Amendment
--rj I IInstitutional
Ins;iarinn:,l Institutional
/a 10-20 , 1
dulac
W Vernon Dr I W Vernon Dr
ParkiOpen Park/Open
Park/Open Spate
Space Spare
Light
Industrial!
Business 10-
['AA, i du,
Light o
Industrial!
Business 0
Park Business/ Business/ Business! Business/ Business! = 10- Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential 10. rtrial/ o du
ness
ark Business/ Business/ Business/ Business/ Business/ a' Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential > .Mixed Use Mixed Use Mixed Use Mixed Use Mixed Use rD 10. du
i
9th St 9th St
N —Light . .
'S Bi4lesi ss/ Industrial! Neighborhood 4- nL V1f _ E I Resi dal
U Mixed Use Business Commercial dL t Park
S Neighborhood
�U]li it. Commercial
isrht
San Antonio Avenue and 9th Street
From MFR-M (Residential Multi-Family Low) to MFR-H (Multi-Family Residential - High) (Densities up to 40 units per acre)
APN(s): 104633332, 104633322, 104633319, 104633313, 104633318, 104633308, 104633326, 104633323, 104633324, 104633317, 104633309, 104633325, 104633307, 104633306, 104633301, 104633304, 104633305, 104633311, 104633310, 104633316, 104633327, 104633329, 104633331, 104633312, 104633303, 104633302

SITE 7
General Plan Amendment
--
4-10
4-10 4-10 4.10 dulac
dufa€ du/at dufac
-..-- 1
E Cumberland St -
0 4.10 4.10� 4-10 li
du/at du/at dufac
IC
p 4.10FPI
c dufac 4-10
dllac I 4-10
du/at
-_
Doreen Ct
4-10 4-10
0 4-10 dufac dufacFilm . .
is dufac
0 4-10 4-10 • Z
c dufac dufac 4-10 C]
dufac 3
— 1 o
'Helena Ct N
. t PB/I to MFR-M

4.10 z 4 iQ h\ (5.58 acres)

4.10 4-70 dulaG � dulac
dufac dufac T rRublic

15. Utilities
0 4.10 4-10 Public\
Ic du/at dulac 4-10 Utilities
duiac
14th St 14th St
Tu r.
rZ ;.. r Fd4.� s
10- c� 10-2 �'1C-26 ufac-
.d
du/at durac d's is 4.1 Q
i MINER. .-J— = du/a€
10120
dufac 07 dufa€ &Ilk Alpine II .11
10=40 Fri
m_
� dcVac 2 I
iD= v ?4-20 _ i° ii-
0 dulac Mr 7 of.2c - i 4.1C
_'--rI_ J" "L 1- it du/at
4-10 I,
d'm'c dufac
�� _r n- �� RI $ 1adui
0Z0T0720I d[MH
0 stlfa ! ' 1 0
ddF c 3' 4
a.

N i0 pp i0 ti di
Mud-
LI1dC
7Q='26 4.10
Lr_L
{ POr
N. du/at Iril
- n 7n— _r- tn-=.n Birch '•, t 1
N. Campus Avenue and 14t" Street
From PB/I (Public/Institutional to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN(s): 104518103, 104518102
Page ;i4U OT 52U

SITE 8
General Plan Amendment
i
a-10 o
dufac
i
E 13th5t 4-10 I
i afar
Park/Open
Spate
m
}
N CO
7 Q 10.20
-- rlulae i
ru
0 °a
2 MFR-L to MFR-M
4-10 4-10 4-10 (12.59 Acres)
dufac dufac dufac
Los Otivos
/
." Public Housing
F Pine St
4-10
dufac C1 10-20 a.14dui S-14
4-1a 1 dufac acMH a[N
4-10 dufac
dufac t
4-10 4
dufac N
Q
g
San Ysidro Ur ,
Commercial/
4-10 10 20 Office
4-10 dufac 4-10 du/ac
du/ac dufac
West St \ 4-10 4-10 4-10 Op
dufac dufac dufac
} Commercial/
\.. Commercial/ Office
Office
4-10 4-1 4.10 4-10 z ValadezSt
du/ac dufac dufac dufac m / $ 3 n
Gyrnbon. a
7l 4-10 4-10
w
du(
E dufac dufacc
m
S
Commercial/
Commercial/ Commerci.: -r;.-„
Northwest corner of N. Campus Avenue E. Pine Street
From MFR-L (Residential Multi-Family Low) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN(s): 104550101, 104551123

SITE 9
General Plan Amendment
Institutional Institutional 20
] 4-10 5aant t4 �ph dui.
c dufac Cathutic Church
10-20 10-20 20-
] 4-10 I dufac dufac duf-
c dufac
Z -- 10- xiI 10-20
v, dul, c dufac E3
MFR-L to MFR-M -o
(1.28 Acres)
4 10 {O 10-20 10-20 10-20 D :.dj ` e dLVac dufac dufac I duixc <
4-10
dufac •
•
•
10-20
dufac 1 0
10-20 0-20 10-20 dufac
4-10 dufac ufad dufac
dufac
10-20 10-20 10-20
dufac dufac dufac
4-10
dufac
I PI
F11fit St qy E11thSt ci
y } 0
— a — ..

L • I rt., 4.1C
in -a E dufac
z z
o
4-10 4-10 4-10 4- 10
dufac dufac dufac dufac dufac
- . • 1 I
Civic/ 4 10 4-10
5crloal 4-10 dufac 4 10 dufac 4 10 _ dufac 4. 1{ dufac dufac dufac dufa.
4-10 4-10
Civic/vic! dufac dufac
I I _ 4-1(
E G St E G.St • dufa
•
N 4-10 4-10 f 4-10
dufac 4-10 dufac dufac
W+E Z. 4- lc
2 du/de 4-10 I Z dufa
S f.n di 1ac a- 3
I . - _ .

Westside of N. Campus Avenue, north of E. 11' Street
From MFR-L (Multi-Family Low) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN(s): 104609122, 104609123, 104609124
flcyu 351 of.120

SITE 10
General Plan Amendment
-, $-14Ill <
.`•, ac MH
0 8-14dui .
- ac MH
,.
$-14dof -- ;x;{Y
ac MH ,/ c„
8-14 duf
ac MH ..' 101)
,, dufac,
- ,
ParkfOpen
Space MFR-L to MFR-M
(5.59 Acres)
r

10.20 Iliac
10-20
10-20 dinar
dufac
---- .r. Arrow&Grove
Market&Liquor
E Arrow Hwy E Arrow Hwy A
-.... . 4-10 �lJlaC 4 l n 4-1a
ParklOpen I 1 dulad ijde dufac 4-10 Space s OufaJ
Eight ; -10 -0ufa 14-10 :4-14' dulaq If Industrial/ 4.10 dufac dufac jdu/a Business duac —
Pa Park I-
Bnsirtessl �--1U ;t-1 dufac I 4-10 4 14 "Axed l se .�— dulae 4ufa i u/ac
industrial/
"Axed tJse
ri Business T�
Park 4i-- 1 1-10
• dufac 4.10 ufaa -1I dufac
dufac dufac
N 4.1
E Light fix dufa
, Light
c el ufa
ndustriall Industrial/ r '-- ---..---L--- i --.--' 4-111 icy S Su5ine55Parle Business I' Orange Grove 5# chi/ac Northwest corner of E. Arrow Highway and Grove Avenue
From MFR-L (Multi-Family Low) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN(s): 104617107, 104617101, 104617102, 104617103

SITE 11
General Plan Amendment
Park/Open . . dulac
Space
r
•.0-;4.
(lt/r
Z 10-20
4-10 g 4.10 4-10 4.10
du/at g du/at du/ac dulat - dulac Fo r
{ 7
N 4
10-20 10.20
dul,r dulac
0 4.10 4-10 MFR-L to MFR-M
it du/at dulac (0.99 Acres)
10 4 10 4 10 10-20 10-20
dulac du lac
Jac dulac dinar
1-- I -
0 d 10 4•10 10-20 10-20
E ducat dulac dulac dulac
I
0 4.10 4-10
3c dulac ducat
10-20
dulac
1 1 1� 2U Via Arco
4-10 dulac 10-;
dufac dui/
4-10 Z 4.10 4-10 Z
du/ac o dulac durac Neighborhood
s 4.10 COm met al i
n durac n 7
gip
1 �'� 1
?th St 9th St 9th St
1 1
I
N 4-10 4-10 Neighborhood 4-10 4-10 4.10 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 du/ac dulac Cammercial dulac du/ac ducat du/at dulac du/ac du/ac du/ac VIL E
S
4-10 4.10 4-10
I ,,a,, I I
N. 11th Avenue, north of 9th Street
From MFR-L (Multi-Family Low).to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN(s): 104646216, 104646217

1 SITE 12
General Plan Amendment
10-20
&Vac
1--1-1111111111111"
10-20
d PI i
• dufac
—
10-20
dufac
•
iTa
m
a•
IN
MFR-L to 10-20
MFR-M du/ac
10 20 (0.97 Acres)
duf c
Neigh borhoo4
Commercial
10-20
dufac
10-21
'5 dwac
I I r
as
9th St 9th St
1 4-1 4-10 4- 10 4-10 4- 10 4-10 4.10 N dufac dulac du/rim dufac dulac dulac wE
4- 10 4-10 4-10
du/ac 4-10 dufac du/ac
9th Street, east of Via Linda
From MFR-L (Multi-Family Low) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN(s): 104646209, 104646220

SITE 13
General Plan Amendment
10-20
E Via Luna E Vfa Luna E Via Len dulac
Ilf
— ParWope
Space
ulac i
E
10-20 10_g} 14-24
du/ac 0-2 dWac
10-20 m
dutac z
IQ-20
du/ac
MFR-L to MFR-M I
10-20 10-il
0 du/ac (3.88 Acres) 20 du!d
10-20
du/ac N
i P\rklOpen E
Space
10-20 10-20
du far tlulac
4-/ac0 3
du m'
z
�•��• 9th St 9th St 9th St 9t
N
4-10 10-20
VV±E dulac dula[
4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 10-20 10-20 10-20 10-20 du/ac dulac du/ac du/ac &Jac du/ac du/ac du/ac du/ac du/ac S
4-10 4-10 4.10
Northwest corner of 9' Street and Via Linda
From MFR-L (Multi-Family Residential Low) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Residential Medium) APN(s): 104646110, 104646109, 104646111, 104646113, 104646105, 104646104, 104646107, 104646106, 104646108, 104646112

SITE 14
General Plan Amendment
auras
Park/Open
Space I Light
Industrial/
Business 10-20.

Park/Open Park du/ac
Space
10-20
r du/ac
10-20 10-20
dulac dulac
I 10-20
dulac
I
MFR-L to MFR-M •
(0.56 Acres) 10-20
10-20 duiac
&ilk
10 • 1a-2r• 10-20
d'ula , . . . durac dulac
m
C
aU 10-20 10-20 10-20
o du/ac dui& claim
co
z
9th St 9th St
10-20 10-20 10-20 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 du/ac du/ac dg.ilac dulac dulac du/3c du/ac dulac N 4-10
dulac
E 10-20 10-20 dui& duiac dulac
S dulac du/ac
E. 9th Street, between Bodenheimer Street and N. 14th Avenue From MFR-L (Multi-Family Residential Low) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Residential Medium)

SITE 15
General Plan Amendment
Ji 1IWOL —
'th St 9th St 9th 5t 9th St
10-20
orhlaod 4-10 4-10 4-10 4.10 4-10 4-10 4-10 du/ac 10-20 10- t 10-2( tierdial dui dulac du/ac du/ac du/ac du/at dulac dulac du/at dulac � du/at du/at

4.10 4-10 4.10 4.10 10.20 10.20
od du/at du/ac 4-10 du/ac du/ac dulao du/at 10-21 du/ac
al du/ac
Business/ Business/ 4-10 10-20
Residential Residential dulac dulac
Mixed Use— Mixed Use
4-10 4-10
—. dWac
Business/ Business/ 4-10 . I dWac d 10.20 Residential Residential
Mixed Use Mixed Use du/ac I 10.20 du/at du/at
5 10-20
D 4-10 10.20 .Wat
ss/ Business/ 4-10 4-10 m du/at du/at dulac
ndaI Residential du/ac du/at
Use Mixed Use
10-20
4-10 4.10 4.10 4-10 du/ac10-20
du/at du/at duiat du/ac 4-10 du/at du/ac I du/
' Business/
Residential
s/ Business/ Mixed Use 4-10 10.20 l _ ial Residential dJ/ac du/ac 10 1 se Mixed Use 4-10 4.10 du/'at
du/ac SFR-M to MFR-L du/at
(6.89 Acres)
ness! du/ac 10-20
iential Business/ du/ac
,d Use Residential 1 I 10-20
Mixed Use Business r 4.10 4.10 - du/ac
Residentia du/ac du/at y
- Mixed Ust z ra
—
• 4-10 s 4-10 Z
du/ac y du/ac

4.10 4-10 du/ac
q Sf du/ac 10dul-20
1y dulac0
Light
Industrial! Li:,r 4-10 10-20
Business l a,�a du/ac du/ac 10
Business dulai
f Park
[f USA 10-20
W E Industrial! Light A St du/ac 10/at dula
Business Industrial/ 5
Park `Business
S 1 Park '
N. 12th Avenue and E. A Street
From SFR-M (Single-Family Medium) to MFR-L (Multi-Family Low) APN(s): 104654242, 104654243, 104654240, 104654238, 104654226, 104654229, 104653101, 104653102, 104653107, 104653108, 104653109

SITE 16
General Plan Amendment
Residential
Biness/ Business/ Business/ Mixed Use sidential Business/ I Residential
fixed Use Residential Business/ Mixed Use Mixxeded Use Residential Mixed 4-10
Mixed Use Mixed Use dufac
Business/
- Residential Business/
Mixed Use Residential I r
Mixed Use business 4-10
Residential dufac
Mixed Use
4-10 4-10
dufac /. , 4-10 du/ac
dufac -
4-10 Light
dufac ct Industrial/
Business Light S
o Light Park Industrial/
I a 4.10 Industrial/ __,_ Business Light Business Li
a du/ac Park Industrial/

4.10 -, Park ---___ Business Indush-ia dufac -- Park
Business
4-10 _--- Park / Light
dufac Industrial/
4-10 Light x eusiness 'II
dufac (Business Light Park
= Business Industrial/
,D Park Business %
Park %
5i Light
— dufa L4 c Industrial/
LISP to MFR-M Light
t. 4-1t} Park (4.17Acres) Industrial/ \ k Ligh dufac Business Indust'
Park Busini
4-10 - Peri
dufac 4-10
4-10 o dufac Light Light Light \ l dufac Industrial) Light
L — Industrial/ Industrial/ Ir
Business Industrial/
E 4 10 Business Business E
Park Park Park Business
J4 dufaacc c5 4 dufac Paris
8th St 8th St 8th
—] in 4-10 } 4-10 4-10
4-10 4-10
cc dufac 4-14 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 t dufac dufac dam dufac 4-10 dufac dufac dufac
Ileac = claim dufac dufac 4.10 \ A du/ac 7 - 4-10
- V: dufac

4.10 10 dufac du/a�
dry -1 E 0
4-10 4.10 4.10 4-10 4-10 4-10 4-10 S dufac du/ae du/ac dufac dufac dufac i dufac 4-10 I 4-10 W
8th Street, between S. 11th Avenue and S. Berlyn Avenue From LI/BP (Light Industrial/Business Park) to MFR-M (Multi-Family Medium) APN(s): 104655102, 104655108, 104655101, 104655107, 104655103, 104655106, 104655141, 104652104