Agenda packet, regular meeting — Vallejo City Council, September 9, 2025 (part 6 of 8)

PAGE 6
subject to seven exceptions. Most of the exceptions require that the City charge a fee which does not exceed the reasonable cost to the City to provide the service for which the fee is charged. Thus, if the fee exceeds the reasonable cost of service, it may be considered a “tax” which must be approved by the voters. MGT has calculated each fee to recover no more than the reasonable cost of each service so that none of the fee adjustments recommended herein will be considered taxes under Proposition 26.

Additionally, it should be noted that some fees might be capped by state law and might not change, regardless of any cost analysis carried out. ♦ Community benefit – The City might wish to subsidize some user fees to reflect policy considerations that supersede cost recovery. For example, many community services fees have very moderate cost recovery levels. Some programs are provided free of charge or for a minimal fee regardless of cost. Youth and senior programs tend to have the lowest cost recovery levels. Miscellaneous classes tend to have a moderate cost recovery level, while adult sports programs typically have a higher cost recovery level. ♦ Private benefit – If a user fee primarily benefits the fee payer, MGT recommends the fee be set at, or close to, 100% full cost recovery.
♦ Service driver – In conjunction with the first point above, the issue of who is the service recipient versus the service driver should also be considered. ♦ Understanding demand – There are other considerations that might inform recommendations for fees not subject to cost recovery limitations. For example, elasticity of demand is a factor in pricing certain municipal services; increasing the price of some services could result in a reduction in the quantity demanded for other services, and vice versa.
♦ Competition – Certain services might be provided by neighboring communities or the private sector. Demand for these services can be highly dependent on what else might be available at lower prices. Furthermore, if the City's fees are too low, demand for services produced by private-sector competitors could decrease.
♦ Incentives – Fees can be set low to encourage participation in a service.

Page 1140 of 1570 ends

PAGE 7
Analysis Highlights
User Fee Studies
Below is a brief discussion of the findings for each department’s user fee study. Please see the user fee summary sheets in Appendix A of this report for the details on the cost analysis for each fee.

The services provided by all departments included in the user fee study create benefit for individuals and the community and are therefore eligible for cost recovery. Because these services primarily benefit the fee payer, the fees are recommended to be set at 100% cost recovery unless otherwise noted.

The results of this fee study show that some fees are over-recovering costs while others are under-recovering costs. Adjusting fees to achieve 100% cost recovery will keep fees aligned with the level of effort needed to provide the associated services.

Fire Department – Fire Prevention Division
The mission of the Vallejo Fire Department is to ensure a safe community through exceptional professional fire service. Its vision is to be a progressive organization that provides leadership and high-quality safety to the community we serve.

The Fire Prevention Section is responsible for:
♦ Fire Inspection Services
♦ Fire and Life Safety Inspections
♦ Plan Check and Permitting
♦ Fire Reports and Investigations
♦ Public Education/Community Outreach
Currently, Fire Prevention Division fees recover approximately 70% of the division’s total costs.

If staff recommendations are adopted, cost recovery would increase to 100%, adding approximately $457,000 in revenue once the fee changes are fully implemented.

Fee Updates
Below is a concise snapshot of every new fee and all adjustments to existing fees proposed for Fire Prevention activities. Each amount reflects the full cost of service, supporting the goal of 100% cost recovery.

New Fees

1. Hood and Duct Extinguishing System: $735

2. Stationary Fire Pump: $1,290

3. Emergency Responder Communication Coverage System: $624

4. Energy Storage System – Residential: $735

5. Energy Storage System – Commercial: $1,845

6. CO2 beverage dispensing systems: $735

7. Stationary Fire Pump: $1,290

8. Emergency Responder Communication Coverage System: $624

9. Energy Storage System – Residential: $735

Page 1141 of 1570 ends

PAGE 8

10. Energy Storage System – Commercial: $1,845

11. CO2 beverage dispensing systems: $735

12. Cryogenic Fluids: $445

13. Additive manufacturing: $445

14. Amusement buildings: $634

15. Energy storage systems: $445

16. Exhibits and trade shows: $445

17. Floor finishing: $445

18. Hot work operations: $445

19. Mobile fueling of hydrogen-fueled vehicles - $445

20. Plant extraction systems: $445

21. Pyroxylin plastics: $445

22. Rooftop heliports: $445

23. Lithium batteries: $445

24. Administrative Citation - Penalty for a Violation (Fireworks) - $1000

25. Printing Fees
a. Per Page
b. Double Sided
c. Photocopy
Updates To Fee Structure

26. Fire alarm systems 26-50 devices: $1,290

27. Fire alarm systems 51-100 devices: $1,845

28. Fire alarm systems >100 devices: $2,956

29. Fire Sprinkler System - Commercial 13/13R(New Installation - per riser/system) a. New Installation - 1-99 sprinklers: $2,179
b. New Installation - 100-199 sprinklers: $2,623
c. New Installation - 200 or more sprinklers: $3,289

30. Fire Sprinkler System - Commercial 13/13R (Tenant Improvement) a. Tenant - 1-99 sprinklers: $957
b. Tenant - 100-199 sprinklers: $1,290
c. Tenant - 200 or more sprinklers: 1,623

31. Residential Fire Sprinkler System (Custom or Master Plan): $1,068

32. Residential Fire Sprinkler System (per lot - inspections only): $513 Department management recommends 100% cost recovery for all fees. This results in cost increases for many fees. Lumber Yards and Woodworking Plant fees and Company - Level Fire

Page 1142 of 1570 ends

PAGE 9
Prevention (Business and Mercantile) fees have among the largest percentage increases at over 200%, while other treatments have increases of as little as 8%. If demand stays the same, the recommended fee changes will generate about $457,000 in additional annual revenue.

Planning and Development Services Department
The Planning and Development Services Department's purpose is to create an environment that fosters sustainable investment while preserving the public's welfare and the environment.

Building Division
Within this department, the Building Division ensures public safety by applying state and local building codes to every construction project. Staff review plans, issue permits and conduct inspections for new construction, additions, renovations and remodels. They also investigate complaints about potentially dangerous or nuisance buildings. This work supports the City’s goal of encouraging development while maintaining a safe built environment.

Current Recovery
Currently, the Building Division’s fee schedule recovers approximately 59% of the division’s total costs. If staff recommendations are adopted, cost recovery would increase to 80%, adding approximately $760,000 in revenue once the fee changes are fully implemented.

Fee Structure and Calculations
The Building Division fee schedule is organized into five primary fee types; each aligned with how services are delivered. This structure improves transparency for applicants, supports accurate cost recovery, and provides staff with a consistent framework for applying fees. The table below outlines each type, its purpose, and the method used to calculate charges.

Fee Structure Description Calculation
Hourly Fees Time-based fee. Minimum base fee applies Base Fee + Additional Hourly Fee* Valuation-Based Fees Core permits tied to project value, aligned to typical staff time on project by size
Base Fee + Additional Per $1000
Increments*
Flat Fees Fixed charge for service provided One-Time Fixed Fee Percentage-Based Fees Fees for complex plan reviews. Based on a percentage of the plan review fee
Plan Review Fee * Applicable
Percentage
Statutory/Ordinance Fees State-mandated fees Fee set by the applicable state or local mandate
*Base Fee = (total hours for all staff involved * rates) Additional Hourly Fee = (hours for non-intake staff involved * rate) Valuation Increments = (Valuation Category Max – Valuation Category Min) / $1,000 increments

Page 1143 of 1570 ends

PAGE 10
Updates Made to Fee Structure
The following updates reflect a combination of structural adjustments and clarifications to the existing fee schedule. These changes were made to improve transparency, align fees more closely with service delivery, and ensure consistency with cost-of-service principles.

1. Penalty and Expired Permits
Clarified as percentage-based charges tied to the original permit value (e.g., 25%–50%), rather than flat fees. This ensures proportionality based on project size and reinforces compliance expectations.

2. Base-Plus-Hourly Format
For plan reviews and certain inspections, clarified the use of a base fee that includes a set number of hours, with additional time billed hourly. This structure was already in use in some areas and has now been formalized and consistently applied.

3. Valuation-Based Fees
Updated sliding scale approach that better reflects project size and complexity with updated assumptions of time efforts, review counts, and project size valuations with more scalable fee tiers.

4. Percentage-Based Plan Review
Retained existing percentage-based calculations for elements like Title 24, Disabled Access, and CALGreen reviews. These were clarified in the fee schedule to ensure consistency and transparency.

5. State-Regulated Fees (e.g., Solar)
Adjusted to match state-mandated maximums and formulas. Language was also refined for clarity, including updates to thresholds (e.g., “>50 kW”) and itemized $/kW rates.

6. Fee Schedule Language Improvements
Strengthened the clarity of fee descriptions by specifying what the base includes, when hourly charges apply, and which items are subject to state or policy-driven limitations.

7. Phased Cost Recovery Application
Most cost-based fees are aligned to a target recovery level (e.g., 80%) and increases are phased in over a three-year period with an adjustment for the Consumer Price Index (CPI) yearly to ease implementation and reduce abrupt jumps.

Page 1144 of 1570 ends

PAGE 11
Planning Division
The Planning Division facilitates new development consistent with the City’s General Plan, specific plans, Zoning Ordinance, Sign Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and other State, Federal and local regulations pertaining to new development activity. The Planning Division supports the Planning Commission, the Architectural Landmarks and Heritage Commission, and the Design Review Board.

Within the Planning Division, current fees recover approximately 44%. If staff recommendations are adopted, cost recovery would increase to 62%, adding approximately $139,000 in revenue once the fee changes are fully implemented.

Fee Updates
The Planning Division is keeping the original structure of their fee schedule; therefore, MGT is not recommending any fee structure updates. There are new fees being added for the following five activities listed below, along with the full cost of each activity:

1. Design Review – Minor: $4,243

2. SB-9 – Lot Split: $3,881

3. SB-9 – Two Unit Development: $3,881

4. SB-9 Lot Split and Two Unit Development: $5,897

5. Street Vender – Permit: $347
Department management recommends a variety of cost recovery levels across the fee structure.

This results in price increases for many fees and price decreases for others. Planned Development fees have the largest percentage increase at approximately 450%, while other fees are expected to decrease by as much as 100%, in the case of Sign Permits: Over the Counter. If demand stays the same, the proposed fee changes are expected to generate approximately $139,000 in additional annual revenue.

Water Department
The Vallejo Water Department provides administrative, engineering, water treatment, and maintenance support for the City's potable (drinking) water treatment and distribution. Our stringent criteria and regulations ensure we meet or exceed all regulations set forth by the California Department of Public Health and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Vallejo Water Department also works closely with the community and local schools to provide conservation education and share information about current rebate programs.

The Water Department was unable to provide annualized volume data for their fees due to recent changes in technology; however, the department was able to provide reasonable level of effort estimates for each fee to enable MGT to calculate the Water Department’s fee on a per transaction basis.

Fee Updates
The Water Department is keeping the majority of its original fee structure. The only change in fee structure relates to moving four of the five “Reduced Pressure Installation” fees from a flat rate to an actual cost fee. Currently the “3-inch or larger reduced pressure” fee is already set as an actual cost fee. The department has also recommended a few slight changes to its current deposit and penalty fees. The “residential sfd” and “multifamily/commercial” water service security deposits have been recommended to update from $148 and $300 (minimum) respectively, to $150 and $400 (minimum), respectively. Also, the department recommended increasing the penalties associated with water meter lock tampering from $75 and $117 for first and second offenses, respectively, to $150 and $200, respectively. The department believes the

Page 1145 of 1570 ends

PAGE 12
increase in deposits reflects the increase in monthly water bills, while the increase in penalties will provide more deterrence from unwanted behavior.

In addition to the minor changes in fee structure and updates to deposits and penalties, the Water Department is adding 20 new fees to its fee schedules. These new fees are as follows, along with the full cost of each activity:

1. Meter Upsizing to ¾ inch – Actual Cost

2. Development Agreement – $599

3. General Plan Update – $599

4. Minor Use Permit – $492

5. Accessory Dwelling Unit – $492

6. Planned Development – $1,337

7. Planned Development – Amendment – $546

8. Preliminary Review (Inside City) – $1,688

9. Preliminary Review (Outside City) – $2,284

10. Preliminary Review (School/Hospital) – $2,284

11. Development Review – Major (Staff Level) (Large Multi-Family, Demolition) – $7,084

12. Development Review – Major (PC Public Hearing) – $733

13. Development Review – SB 35 and/or Density Bonus – $6,189

14. Development Review – Minor (Single/Multi Family, Tenant Improvements) – $3,095

15. Lot Line Adjustment – $492

16. Parcel Map – $1,230

17. Parcel Map Amendment – $492

18. Tentative Map – 5-20 lots - $4,303

19. Tentative Map – 20+ lots - $10,278

20. Tentative Map Amendment – $4,391
The new fees are designed to capture revenue related to services already provided by the department but that are not yet being charged.

Department management recommends 100% cost recovery for all fees. Most fees are increased because of this level of cost recovery; however, there are a select number of fees that will decrease. See Appendix A for a summary of the results.

Page 1146 of 1570 ends

PAGE 13
Peer Comparison Survey
Peer comparisons provide insights into fee practices and structures. By examining the fee structures of neighboring jurisdictions, agencies can ensure their fees are competitive and fair.

Moreover, peer comparisons can help to identify the best industry practices and innovative approaches that can improve efficiency and service delivery. This could affect how City implements their fee structures and levels.

As with any survey across jurisdictions, it is often challenging to make an “apples-to-apples” comparison. This is because organizational structures, fee schedules and practices, and legal requirements vary across jurisdictions. Also, peer communities might not have completed a cost recovery analysis or updated their fee policy for many years.

The City requested that MGT conduct a comparison survey of various fees charged by peer fire departments. These peers included the following, which were suggested by City:
♦ Concord
♦ Fairfield
♦ Richmond
♦ San Pablo
♦ Santa Rosa
♦ Vacaville
The survey included numerous examples of fees charged or proposed by the following departments and divisions:
♦ Fire Department
♦ Planning and Development Services Department
o Building Division
o Planning Division
♦ Water Department
A complete list of fees included in the survey can be found in Appendix B.

Page 1147 of 1570 ends

PAGE 14
Recommendations
MGT’s recommendations are grounded in the results of our thorough analysis and are designed to be practical and achievable. The primary objective is to enhance the City’s fee structure and fee levels to improve cost recovery and better match the people who benefit from the service with those who pay for it.
♦ The City should build on its investment in this cost-of-service analysis by continuing to analyze its fees and charges, whether this is done by staff or outside consultants. Once the commitment is made to understand the full cost of providing services, it is important to review and update the analysis to keep pace with changes in service delivery, staffing changes, and demand levels.
♦ The City should perform this detailed analysis at least every three but not more than five years, with minor adjustments in the non‐study years. This will help keep pace with changes in costs and other economic factors.
♦ The City should also apply an annual inflation adjustment to fees levels to keep pace with inflation. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a commonly used macroeconomic statistic that is employed to adjust fee levels over time, although there are other options. The best practice in industry is to apply an inflation adjustment once per year as part of the City’s annual budget process. This is particularly helpful once an agency has chosen to adopt a cost recovery policy – whether 100% of the cost or something less – to keep fees at the desired level.

Page 1148 of 1570 ends

PAGE 15
Appendix A – User Fee Study Results
The following pages show the individual fee study results.

Fire Prevention Division
No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
1 Plan Review and Inspection Services
2 Alternative agent extinguishing systems (non-sprinkler types) Flat Fee 11 $ 824 $ 1,068 77% 11,750 $ $ 9,059 $ 2,691 100% $ 1,068 $ 11,750 $ 2,691 $ - 3 NEW: Hood and Duct Extinguishing System New Fee 20 $ - $ 735 0% $ 14,701 $ - $ 14,701 100% $ 735 $ 14,701 $ 14,701 $ - 4 Fire Alarm Systems (device count includes panel(s) and initiating devices) New Header - $ 605 $ 402 150% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 402 $ - $ - $ - 5 a. Fire alarm systems 0-25 devices New Fee 25 $ - $ 957 0% $ 23,928 $ - $ 23,928 100% $ 957 $ 23,928 $ 23,928 $ - 6 b. Fire alarm systems 26-50 devices New Fee 15 $ - $ 1,290 0% 19,353 $ $ - $ 19,353 100% $ 1,290 $ 19,353 $ 19,353 $ - 7 c. Fire alarm systems 51-100 devices New Fee 10 $ - $ 1,845 0% 18,454 $ $ - $ 18,454 100% $ 1,845 $ 18,454 $ 18,454 $ - 8 d. Fire alarm systems >100 devices New Fee 5 $ - $ 2,956 0% 14,779 $ $ - $ 14,779 100% $ 2,956 $ 14,779 $ 14,779 $ - 9 e. Fire alarm systems Communications upgrade New Fee 30 $ - $ 513 0% 15,390 $ $ - $ 15,390 100% $ 513 $ 15,390 $ 15,390 $ - 10 Installation of liquid petroleum gas tanks Flat Fee 2 $ 627 $ 624 100% $ 1,248 $ 1,254 $ (6) 100% $ 624 $ 1,248 $ (6) $ - 11 Installation of medical gas systems Flat Fee 6 $ 665 $ 1,068 62% $ 6,409 $ 3,989 $ 2,420 100% $ 1,068 $ 6,409 $ 2,420 $ - 12 Installation of spray booths Flat Fee 4 $ 665 $ 735 90% $ 2,940 $ 2,660 $ 280 100% $ 735 $ 2,940 $ 280 $ - 13 Installation of aboveground hazardous material tank Flat Fee 4 $ 627 $ 846 74% $ 3,384 $ 2,508 $ 877 100% $ 846 $ 3,384 $ 877 $ - 14 Site plan review, 1 - 5,000 sq ft Flat Fee 96 $ 411 $ 846 49% 81,225 $ $ 39,477 $ 41,747 100% $ 846 $ 81,225 $ 41,747 $ - 15 Site plan review, 5,001+ sq ft Flat Fee 36 $ 617 $ 957 64% 34,456 $ $ 22,206 $ 12,251 100% $ 957 $ 34,456 $ 12,251 $ - 16 Bell & Pull Stations in Residential Care Homes Flat Fee 5 $ 498 $ 513 97% $ 2,565 $ 2,492 $ 73 100% $ 513 $ 2,565 $ 73 $ - 17 New building plan review and Inspection
Actual Cost -25% of bldg
pmt/pc fee 125 $ - $ 69 0% $ 8,605 $ - $ 8,605 100% $ 69 $ 8,605 $ 8,605 $ - 18 Monitoring equipment for sprinkler/alarm systems Flat Fee 20 $ 415 $ 513 81% 10,260 $ $ 8,291 $ 1,968 100% $ 513 $ 10,260 $ 1,968 $ - 19 Underground fire service installation Flat Fee 15 $ 824 $ 957 86% 14,357 $ $ 12,353 $ 2,004 100% $ 957 $ 14,357 $ 2,004 $ - 20 Fire Sprinkler System - Commerical 13/13R(New Installation - per riser/system) New Header - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 21 a. New Installation - 1-99 sprinklers New Fee 5 $ - $ 2,179 0% 10,893 $ $ - $ 10,893 100% $ 2,179 $ 10,893 $ 10,893 $ - 22 b. New Installation - 100-199 sprinklers New Fee 20 $ - $ 2,623 0% 52,453 $ $ - $ 52,453 100% $ 2,623 $ 52,453 $ 52,453 $ - 23 c. New Installation - 200 or more sprinklers New Fee 10 $ - $ 3,289 0% 32,889 $ $ - $ 32,889 100% $ 3,289 $ 32,889 $ 32,889 $ - 24 Fire Sprinkler System - Commercial 13/13R (Tenant Improvement) New Header - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 25 a. Tenant - 1-99 sprinklers New Fee 20 $ - $ 957 0% 19,142 $ $ - $ 19,142 100% $ 957 $ 19,142 $ 19,142 $ - 26 b. Tenant - 100-199 sprinklers New Fee 5 $ - $ 1,290 0% $ 6,451 $ - $ 6,451 100% $ 1,290 $ 6,451 $ 6,451 $ - 27 c. Tenant - 200 or more sprinklers New Fee 5 $ - $ 1,623 0% $ 8,117 $ - $ 8,117 100% $ 1,623 $ 8,117 $ 8,117 $ - 28 Residential Fire Sprinkler System (Custom or Master Plan) New Fee 15 $ - $ 1,068 0% 16,022 $ $ - $ 16,022 100% $ 1,068 $ 16,022 $ 16,022 $ - 29 Residential Fire Sprinkler System (per lot - inspections only) New Fee 75 $ - $ 513 0% 38,474 $ $ - $ 38,474 100% $ 513 $ 38,474 $ 38,474 $ - 30 NEW: Stationary Fire Pump New Fee - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 31 Special After Hours Inspections Hourly; 2 hr min 20 $ 194 $ 222 88% $ 4,441 $ 3,889 $ 553 100% $ 222 $ 4,441 $ 553 $ - 32 Emergency Responder Communication Coverage System New Fee 15 $ - $ 624 0% $ 9,360 $ - $ 9,360 100% $ 624 $ 9,360 $ 9,360 $ - 33 Energy Storage System - Residential New Fee 20 $ - $ 735 0% 14,701 $ $ - $ 14,701 100% $ 735 $ 14,701 $ 14,701 $ - 34 Energy Storage System - Commercial New Fee 5 $ - $ 1,845 0% $ 9,227 $ - $ 9,227 100% $ 1,845 $ 9,227 $ 9,227 $ - 35 CO2 beverage dispensing systems New Fee 20 $ - $ 735 0% 14,701 $ $ - $ 14,701 100% $ 735 $ 14,701 $ 14,701 $ - 36 Flammable or combustible liquid tanks (above ground): Permit to install Flat Fee - $ 600 $ 645 93% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 645 $ - $ - $ - 37 Base Fee by Occupancy State Mandated Inspections
38 Pre-insp of residential care facil <25 Flat Fee 60 $ 313 $ 445 70% 26,725 $ $ 18,773 $ 7,952 100% $ 445 $ 26,725 $ 7,952 $ - 39 Pre-insp of residential care facil >25 Flat Fee 60 $ 362 $ 634 57% 38,022 $ $ 21,723 $ 16,299 100% $ 634 $ 38,022 $ 16,299 $ - 40 Clinics requiring licensing clearance Flat Fee 10 $ 241 $ 257 94% $ 2,571 $ 2,414 $ 158 100% $ 257 $ 2,571 $ 158 $ - Recommendations
City of Vallejo Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals

Page 1149 of 1570 ends

PAGE 16
No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
41 Residential Care Homes Header 25 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 42 R-1 Residential Occupancies: Up to 20 Rooms Flat Fee 16 $ 362 $ 634 57% 10,139 $ $ 5,793 $ 4,346 100% $ 634 $ 10,139 $ 4,346 $ - 43 R-1 Residential Occupancies: 20 Rooms + Flat Fee 7 $ 460 $ 1,010 46% $ 7,072 $ 3,223 $ 3,849 100% $ 1,010 $ 7,072 $ 3,849 $ - 44 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 3-5 Units Flat Fee 471 $ 453 $ 257 176% 121,107 $ $ 213,156 $ (92,048) 100% $ 257 $ 121,107 $ (92,048) $ - 45 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 6-15 units Flat Fee 98 $ 601 $ 351 171% 34,425 $ $ 58,916 $ (24,491) 100% $ 351 $ 34,425 $ (24,491) $ - 46 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 16-25 units Flat Fee 24 $ 748 $ 634 118% 15,209 $ $ 17,942 $ (2,733) 100% $ 634 $ 15,209 $ (2,733) $ - 47 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 26-60 units Flat Fee 16 $ 895 $ 775 116% 12,399 $ $ 14,321 $ (1,923) 100% $ 775 $ 12,399 $ (1,923) $ - 48 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 61-100 units Flat Fee 11 $ 1,043 $ 916 114% 10,077 $ $ 11,468 $ (1,391) 100% $ 916 $ 10,077 $ (1,391) $ - 49 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 101-200 units Flat Fee 19 $ 1,238 $ 1,104 112% 20,984 $ $ 23,524 $ (2,541) 100% $ 1,104 $ 20,984 $ (2,541) $ - 50 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 201-300 units Flat Fee 3 $ 1,386 $ 1,246 111% $ 3,737 $ 4,157 $ (420) 100% $ 1,246 $ 3,737 $ (420) $ - 51 R-2 Residential Occupancies: 301-400+ units Flat Fee 1 $ 1,533 $ 1,387 111% $ 1,387 $ 1,533 $ (146) 100% $ 1,387 $ 1,387 $ (146) $ - 52 R-3 Residential Occupancies: Licensed Day Care Flat Fee 104 $ 230 $ 445 52% 46,323 $ $ 23,941 $ 22,382 100% $ 445 $ 46,323 $ 22,382 $ - 53 R-4 Residential Occupancies Flat Fee 5 $ 460 $ 445 103% $ 2,227 $ 2,302 $ (75) 100% $ 445 $ 2,227 $ (75) $ - 54 I-2 Hospitals, Nursing Homes & Other Non-Amb Health Care Facilities Flat Fee 10 $ 656 $ 822 80% $ 8,220 $ 6,559 $ 1,660 100% $ 822 $ 8,220 $ 1,660 $ - 55 I-2.1 Ambulatory Health Care Facilities Flat Fee 9 $ 460 $ 1,010 46% $ 9,092 $ 4,144 $ 4,949 100% $ 1,010 $ 9,092 $ 4,949 $ - 56 I-3 Jails, Correctional Centers & Other Places of Involuntary Restraint Flat Fee 5 $ 460 $ 445 103% $ 2,227 $ 2,302 $ (75) 100% $ 445 $ 2,227 $ (75) $ - 57 I-4 Day Care Facilities Flat Fee 10 $ 460 $ 634 73% $ 6,337 $ 4,604 $ 1,733 100% $ 634 $ 6,337 $ 1,733 $ - 58 High-rise annual inspection Flat Fee 1 $ 876 $ 1,421 62% $ 1,421 $ 876 $ 545 100% $ 1,421 $ 1,421 $ 545 $ - 59 Business License Inspection, (under 1,500 sq ft) Flat Fee 400 $ 197 $ 257 76% 102,851 $ $ 78,668 $ 24,183 100% $ 257 $ 102,851 $ 24,183 $ - 60 Business License Inspection, (over 1,500 sq ft) Flat Fee 200 $ 345 $ 445 78% 89,083 $ $ 69,058 $ 20,025 100% $ 445 $ 89,083 $ 20,025 $ - 61 Fire Report Flat Fee - $ 20 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 62 Private School (K-12) Flat Fee 25 $ 313 $ 634 49% 15,842 $ $ 7,822 $ 8,020 100% $ 634 $ 15,842 $ 8,020 $ - 63 Fire Code Operational Permits
64 Aerosol Products Flat Fee 10 $ 264 $ 445 59% $ 4,454 $ 2,637 $ 1,817 100% $ 445 $ 4,454 $ 1,817 $ - 65 Motor fuel-dispensing facilities Flat Fee 5 $ 368 $ - 0% $ - $ 1,838 $ (1,838) 100% $ - $ - $ (1,838) $ - 66 Aviation facilities Flat Fee - $ 965 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 67 Waste handling Flat Fee 10 $ 665 $ 565 118% $ 5,649 $ 6,649 $ (1,000) 100% $ 565 $ 5,649 $ (1,000) $ - 68 Open flames and candles Flat Fee 10 $ 264 $ 257 103% $ 2,571 $ 2,637 $ (66) 100% $ 257 $ 2,571 $ (66) $ - 69 Carnivals & Fairs Flat Fee 5 $ 460 $ 445 103% $ 2,227 $ 2,302 $ (75) 100% $ 445 $ 2,227 $ (75) $ - 70 Cellulose nitrate film & storage Flat Fee - $ 241 $ 422 57% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 422 $ - $ - $ - 71 Combustible fibers storage Flat Fee 5 $ 460 $ 445 103% $ 2,227 $ 2,302 $ (75) 100% $ 445 $ 2,227 $ (75) $ - 72 Miscellaneous combustible storage. (excess of 2,500 cubic feet) Flat Fee 15 $ 460 $ 445 103% $ 6,681 $ 6,906 $ (225) 100% $ 445 $ 6,681 $ (225) $ - 73 Compressed gases Flat Fee 30 $ 605 $ 534 113% 16,005 $ $ 18,136 $ (2,131) 100% $ 534 $ 16,005 $ (2,131) $ - 74 New:Cryogenic Fluids New Fee - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 75 Dry cleaning plants Flat Fee 12 $ 362 $ 351 103% $ 4,215 $ 4,345 $ (129) 100% $ 351 $ 4,215 $ (129) $ - 76 Combustible dust-producing operations Flat Fee 2 $ 362 $ 445 81% $ 891 $ 724 $ 167 100% $ 445 $ 891 $ 167 $ - 77 Private fire hydrants Flat Fee 100 $ 264 $ 257 103% 25,713 $ $ 26,371 $ (658) 100% $ 257 $ 25,713 $ (658) $ - 78 Explosives Flat Fee 5 $ 665 $ 640 104% $ 3,201 $ 3,324 $ (124) 100% $ 640 $ 3,201 $ (124) $ - 79 Flammable or combustible liquids Flat Fee 100 $ 264 $ 351 75% 35,127 $ $ 26,371 $ 8,756 100% $ 351 $ 35,127 $ 8,756 $ - 80 Fruit Ripening Flat Fee 2 $ 264 $ 445 59% $ 891 $ 527 $ 363 100% $ 445 $ 891 $ 363 $ - 81 Fumigation or thermal insecticide fogging Flat Fee 25 $ 204 $ 445 46% 11,135 $ $ 5,112 $ 6,023 100% $ 445 $ 11,135 $ 6,023 $ - 82 Repair garages and motor fuel-dispensing facilities - up to 2 bays Flat Fee 70 $ 204 $ 445 46% 31,179 $ $ 14,314 $ 16,865 100% $ 445 $ 31,179 $ 16,865 $ - 83 Repair garages and motor fuel-dispensing facilities - 3 or more bays Flat Fee 65 $ 277 $ 540 51% 35,071 $ $ 18,013 $ 17,058 100% $ 540 $ 35,071 $ 17,058 $ - 84 Hazardous materials Flat Fee 5 $ 427 $ 445 96% $ 2,227 $ 2,134 $ 93 100% $ 445 $ 2,227 $ 93 $ - 85 NEW: HPM facilities New Fee - split from
above - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ -
City of Vallejo Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals Recommendations

Page 1150 of 1570 ends

PAGE 17
No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
86 High-piled combustible storage Flat Fee 15 $ 1,125 $ 634 178% $ 9,505 $ 16,879 $ (7,374) 100% $ 634 $ 9,505 $ (7,374) $ - 87 Liquid or gas fueled equipment (in assembly buildings) Flat Fee 1 $ 277 $ 445 62% $ 445 $ 277 $ 168 100% $ 445 $ 445 $ 168 $ - 88 LP-gas Flat Fee 30 $ 486 $ 422 115% 12,674 $ $ 14,583 $ (1,909) 100% $ 422 $ 12,674 $ (1,909) $ - 89 Lumber Yards and woodworking plants Flat Fee 2 $ 231 $ 822 28% $ 1,644 $ 461 $ 1,183 100% $ 822 $ 1,644 $ 1,183 $ - 90 Magnesium Flat Fee 1 $ 382 $ 445 86% $ 445 $ 382 $ 63 100% $ 445 $ 445 $ 63 $ - 91 Covered and open mall buildings Flat Fee 1 $ 486 $ 753 65% $ 753 $ 486 $ 267 100% $ 753 $ 753 $ 267 $ - 92 Temporary occupant load increase Flat Fee - $ 702 $ 257 273% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 257 $ - $ - $ - 93 Open Burning Flat Fee 5 $ 277 $ 257 108% $ 1,286 $ 1,386 $ (100) 100% $ 257 $ 1,286 $ (100) $ - 94 Organic Coatings Flat Fee 2 $ 634 $ 445 142% $ 891 $ 1,267 $ (376) 100% $ 445 $ 891 $ (376) $ - 95 Places of Assembly: A-1 Flat Fee 3 $ 460 $ 822 56% $ 2,466 $ 1,381 $ 1,085 100% $ 822 $ 2,466 $ 1,085 $ - 96 Places of Assembly: A-2 Flat Fee 95 $ 460 $ 634 73% 60,201 $ $ 43,737 $ 16,464 100% $ 634 $ 60,201 $ 16,464 $ - 97 Places of Assembly: A-3 Flat Fee 96 $ 460 $ 540 85% 51,797 $ $ 44,197 $ 7,600 100% $ 540 $ 51,797 $ 7,600 $ - 98 Places of Assembly: A-4 Flat Fee 1 $ 460 $ 822 56% $ 822 $ 460 $ 362 100% $ 822 $ 822 $ 362 $ - 99 Places of Assembly; A-5 Flat Fee 2 $ 460 $ 445 103% $ 891 $ 921 $ (30) 100% $ 445 $ 891 $ (30) $ - 100 Pyrotechnic special effects materials Flat Fee 1 $ 194 $ 565 34% $ 565 $ 194 $ 370 100% $ 565 $ 565 $ 370 $ - 101 Refrigeration Equipment Flat Fee 5 $ 264 $ 445 59% $ 2,227 $ 1,319 $ 909 100% $ 445 $ 2,227 $ 909 $ - 102 Spraying or Dipping Flat Fee 30 $ 824 $ 445 185% 13,362 $ $ 24,707 $ (11,344) 100% $ 445 $ 13,362 $ (11,344) $ - 103 Temporary membrane structures and tents Flat Fee 25 $ 605 $ 422 143% 10,562 $ $ 15,114 $ (4,552) 100% $ 422 $ 10,562 $ (4,552) $ - 104 Tire-rebuilding plants Flat Fee - $ 264 $ 634 42% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 634 $ - $ - $ - 105 Storage of scrap tires and tire byproducts Flat Fee 25 $ 362 $ 634 57% 15,842 $ $ 9,051 $ 6,791 100% $ 634 $ 15,842 $ 6,791 $ - 106 Cutting and welding Flat Fee 18 $ 362 $ 351 103% $ 6,323 $ 6,517 $ (194) 100% $ 351 $ 6,323 $ (194) $ - 107 Additional re-inspections Flat Fee - $ 194 $ 188 103% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 188 $ - $ - $ - 108 New: Additive manufacturing. CFC 105.5.1 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 109 New: Amusement buildings. CFC 105.5.3 New Fee - $ - $ 634 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 634 $ - $ - $ - 110 New: Energy storage systems. CFC 105.5.14 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 111 New: Exhibits and trade shows. CFC 105.5.15 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 112 New: Floor finishing. CFC 105.5.19 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 113 New: Hot work operations. CFC 105.5.25 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 114 New: Mobile fueling of hydrogen-fueled vehicles. CFC 105.5.32 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 115 New: Plant extraction systems. CFC 105.5.40 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 116 New: Pyroxylin plastics. CFC 105.5.43 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 117 New: Rooftop heliports. CFC 105.5.46 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 118 New: Lithium batteries. CFC 105.5.53 New Fee - $ - $ 445 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 445 $ - $ - $ - 119 Other Fire Services -
120 Various Flat Fee - $ 194 $ 188 103% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 188 $ - $ - $ - 121 Stand By Flat Fee - $ 194 $ 188 103% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 188 $ - $ - $ - 122 Witness/deposition appearance Hourly - $ 194 $ 188 103% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 188 $ - $ - $ - 123 EMS First Responder Flat Fee - $ 561 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 124 DUI Incident Response (per staff hour - equipment is billed separately) Hourly - $ 307 $ 339 91% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 339 $ - $ - $ - 125 Unsafe Buildings Fire Code Hearing Appeal Fee - Residential (1-2 Units) Flat Fee - $ 536 $ 482 111% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 482 $ - $ - $ - 126 Unsafe Buildings Fire Code Hearing Appeal Fee - Residential (3-5 Units) Flat Fee - $ 896 $ 821 109% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 821 $ - $ - $ - 127 Unsafe Buildings Fire Code Hearing Appeal Fee - Residential (6-25 Units) Flat Fee - $ 1,792 $ 1,641 109% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 1,641 $ - $ - $ - 128 Unsafe Buildings Fire Code Hearing Appeal Fee - Residential (26+ Units) Flat Fee - $ 4,520 $ 3,974 114% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 3,974 $ - $ - $ - 129 Unsafe Buildings Fire Code Hearing Appeal Fee - Commercial Flat Fee - $ 4,520 $ 3,974 114% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 3,974 $ - $ - $ - 130 Company - Level Fire Prevention (Business and Mercantile) Hourly - $ 190 $ 710 27% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 710 $ - $ - $ - 131 Administrative Citation - Penalty for a Violation (Fireworks) New Fee - Per Violation - $ 1,000 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - Recommendations
City of Vallejo Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals

Page 1151 of 1570 ends

PAGE 18
No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
132 Printing Fees -
133 Per Page New Fee - Per Page - $ 0 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 134 Double Sided New Fee - Per Page - $ 0 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 135 Photo Copy New Fee - Per Page - $ 0 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 136 non-fee related activity Fee 1 $ - $ 33,659,164 0% 33,659,164 $ $ - $ 33,659,164 100% 33,659,164 $ $ 33,659,164 $ 33,659,164 $ - City of Vallejo Fire Department
Fire Prevention Division
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals Recommendations

Page 1152 of 1570 ends

PAGE 19
Planning and Development Services Department – Building Division

Page 1153 of 1570 ends

PAGE 20

Page 1154 of 1570 ends

PAGE 21

Page 1155 of 1570 ends

PAGE 22

Page 1156 of 1570 ends

PAGE 23
No. Service Name Fee Description
Annual
Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy
Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
157 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy: -
158 First Month (0-30 days) Flat Fee 152 $ 597 $ 899 66% 136,695 $ $ 90,701 $ 45,994 80% $ 719 $ 109,356 $ 18,655 $ 27,339 159 Second Month (31 - 60 days) Flat Fee 148 $ 1,494 $ 558 268% 82,580 $ $ 221,115 $ (138,535) 80% $ 446 $ 66,064 $ (155,051) $ 16,516 160 Third Month (61 - 90 days) Flat Fee 141 $ 2,989 $ 558 536% 78,675 $ $ 421,473 $ (342,798) 80% $ 446 $ 62,940 $ (358,533) $ 15,735 161 Day 91 - Red tag and remove utilities - Post "DO NOT OCCUPY" (NOTE) - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 162 New City Ordinance AB 2598 -
163 1st Violation Penalty 38 $ 130 $ - 0% $ - $ 4,940 $ (4,940) 100% $ - $ - $ (4,940) $ - 164 2nd Violation of Same Ordinance within 1 Year Penalty 5 $ 700 $ - 0% $ - $ 3,500 $ (3,500) 100% $ - $ - $ (3,500) $ - 165 Each Additional Violations of Same Ordinance within 1 Year Penalty - $ 1,300 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - Recommendations
City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Building Division
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals

Page 1157 of 1570 ends

PAGE 24
Planning and Development Services Department – Planning Division No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
1 Zoning applications
2 Temporary Use Permit Flat Fee 25 $ 867 $ 1,416 61% 35,412 $ $ 21,683 $ 13,729 80% 1,133 $ $ 28,330 $ 6,647 $ 7,082 3 Temporary Use Permit - Special Events Flat Fee 6 $ 94 $ 480 20% $ 2,878 $ 563 $ 2,315 60% $ 288 $ 1,727 $ 1,164 $ 1,151 4 Annexations $5,000 deposit + Hourly - $ 229 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 Appeal to Commission/Board/Council plus noticing fee Flat Fee - $ 803 $ 8,150 10% $ - $ - $ - 40% 3,260 $ $ - $ - $ - 6 Certificate of Appropriateness - Public Hearing Flat Fee 11 $ 3,521 $ 5,974 59% 65,718 $ $ 38,726 $ 26,992 59% 3,525 $ $ 38,774 $ 47 $ 26,944 7 Certificate of Appropriateness - Staff level Flat Fee - $ 824 $ 3,520 23% $ - $ - $ - 40% 1,408 $ $ - $ - $ - 8 Certificate of Compliance Flat Fee - $ 3,226 $ 5,143 63% $ - $ - $ - 70% 3,600 $ $ - $ - $ - 9 Certificate of Conformity Flat Fee - $ 2,746 $ 4,481 61% $ - $ - $ - 70% 3,137 $ $ - $ - $ - 10 Development Agreement $5,000 deposit + Hourly - $ 229 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 11 General Plan Amendment Flat Fee - $ 8,234 $ 18,098 45% $ - $ - $ - 60% 10,859 $ $ - $ - $ - 12 General Plan Amendment <5 acres or <.5 FAR Flat Fee 1 $ 4,115 $ 8,423 49% 8,423 $ $ 4,115 $ 4,308 70% 5,896 $ $ 5,896 $ 1,781 $ 2,527 13 Exception Flat Fee 16 $ 2,275 $ 5,510 41% 88,160 $ $ 36,405 $ 51,755 50% 2,755 $ $ 44,080 $ 7,675 $ 44,080 14 Minor Use permit Flat Fee - $ 1,780 $ 5,979 30% $ - $ - $ - 40% 2,391 $ $ - $ - $ - 15 Accessory Dwelling Unit Flat Fee - $ 792 $ 1,806 44% $ - $ - $ - 50% $ 903 $ - $ - $ - 16 Planned Development: Hourly Rate: $5,000 deposit, up to maximum fee of $27,840 (120 hours)
Deposit + Hourly (Max
$27,195) 1 $ 5,000 $ 5,961 84% 5,961 $ $ 5,000 $ 961 461% 27,480 $ $ 27,480 $ 22,480 $ (21,519) 17 Planned Development - (Amendment)
Deposit + Hourly (Max
$6,799) 1 $ 3,000 $ - 0% $ - $ 3,000 $ (3,000) 100% $ - $ - $ (3,000) $ - 18 Design Review DRB - Major Flat Fee 7 $ 7,382 $ 13,745 54% 96,214 $ $ 51,671 $ 44,542 60% 8,247 $ $ 57,728 $ 6,057 $ 38,485 19 Preliminary Review Hourly 8 $ 229 $ - 0% $ - $ 1,832 $ (1,832) 100% $ - $ - $ (1,832) $ - 20 Public Convenience or Necessity Flat Fee - $ 2,030 $ 3,453 59% $ - $ - $ - 100% 3,453 $ $ - $ - $ - 21 Public Notice Mailing (200 & 300 feet) Flat Fee - $ 384 $ 1,197 32% $ - $ - $ - 45% $ 539 $ - $ - $ - 22 Public Notice Mailing (500 & 1,000 feet) Flat Fee - $ 681 $ 1,521 45% $ - $ - $ - 75% 1,141 $ $ - $ - $ - 23 Rezoning/Map Prezoning, Text Amendment: Hourly Rate: $5,000 deposit, up to maximum fee of $18,320 (80 hours)
Deposit + Hourly (Max
$10,844) 1 $ 5,000 $ 17,524 29% 17,524 $ $ 5,000 $ 12,524 105% 18,320 $ $ 18,320 $ 13,320 $ (796) 24 Sign Permits - Over-the-Counter Flat Fee - $ 166 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 25 Sign Permits - All Others Flat Fee 13 $ 428 $ 878 49% 11,417 $ $ 5,565 $ 5,852 75% $ 659 $ 8,562 $ 2,998 $ 2,854 26 Sign Master Plan/Program Flat Fee 1 $ 2,174 $ 3,716 58% 3,716 $ $ 2,174 $ 1,542 75% 2,787 $ $ 2,787 $ 613 $ 929 27 Development Review - Major (Staff Level) Flat Fee - $ 5,513 $ 8,215 67% $ - $ - $ - 67% 5,504 $ $ - $ - $ - 28 Development Review - Major (PC Public Hearing) - Flat Fee, No deposit Deposit + Hourly (Max
$7,222) 7 $ 3,000 $ 9,515 32% 66,603 $ $ 21,000 $ 45,603 70% 6,660 $ $ 46,622 $ 25,622 $ 19,981 29 Development Review - SB 35 and/or Density Bonus Flat Fee 1 $ 4,628 $ 6,152 75% 6,152 $ $ 4,628 $ 1,523 90% 5,536 $ $ 5,536 $ 908 $ 615 30 Development Review - Minor Flat Fee 34 $ 824 $ 4,111 20% 139,759 $ $ 27,999 $ 111,760 30% 1,233 $ $ 41,928 $ 13,928 $ 97,832 31 Special Requests Flat Fee - $ 229 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 32 Specific Plan - New/Amendment: Hourly Rate: $5,000 deposit, up to maximum fee of $27,195 (80 hours)
$5,000 deposit + Hourly
(max 50 hrs) - $ 229 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 27,480 $ $ - $ - $ - 33 Major Use Permit Flat Fee 6 $ 5,455 $ 9,894 55% 59,367 $ $ 32,733 $ 26,634 65% 6,431 $ $ 38,588 $ 5,856 $ 20,778 34 Major Use Permit - Amendment - (25% of original fee) 25% of orig. fee - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 35 Variance Flat Fee 2 $ 8,170 $ 12,629 65% 25,258 $ $ 16,340 $ 8,918 70% 8,840 $ $ 17,681 $ 1,341 $ 7,577 36 Zoning Verification Letter Flat Fee 19 $ 427 $ 1,225 35% 23,275 $ $ 8,114 $ 15,161 55% $ 674 $ 12,801 $ 4,688 $ 10,474 37 Environmental Quality
38 Environmental lmpact Report - (Contract Plus 20%) Consult + 20% - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 39 Mitigated Negative Declaration/Addendum, City Staff Prepared Flat Fee - $ 10,065 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Planning Division
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals Recommendations

Page 1158 of 1570 ends

PAGE 25

No. Service Name Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
40 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Consultant Prepared - (Contract plus 20%) Consult + 20% - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 41 Subdivision Applications
42 Lot Line Adjustment Flat Fee 3 $ 2,504 $ 4,487 56% 13,462 $ $ 7,513 $ 5,949 80% 3,590 $ $ 10,769 $ 3,256 $ 2,692 43 Parcel Map Flat Fee 5 $ 3,342 $ 6,048 55% 30,240 $ $ 16,708 $ 13,532 80% 4,838 $ $ 24,192 $ 7,484 $ 6,048 44 Parcel Map Amendment Flat Fee - $ 2,339 $ 3,535 66% $ - $ - $ - 80% 2,828 $ $ - $ - $ - 45 Tentative Map 5-20 lots Flat Fee 3 $ 11,275 $ 21,048 54% 63,144 $ $ 33,825 $ 29,318 75% 15,786 $ $ 47,358 $ 13,532 $ 15,786 46 Tentative Map 20 + lots Plus $225 per lot - $ 12,628 $ 29,136 43% $ - $ - $ - 60% 17,481 $ $ - $ - $ - 47 Tentative Map Amendment (25% of Original Fee) 25% of orig. fee - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 48 Zoning Compliance Review-Minor (Over the Counter Plan Check) Flat Fee - $ 66 $ 133 50% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 133 $ - $ - $ - 49 Zoning Compliance Review - Major (Not Over the Counter/Plan Check) Flat Fee - $ 269 $ 955 28% $ - $ - $ - 45% $ 430 $ - $ - $ - 50 Code Enforcement Review: Non-Compliance Penalty/Fine Flat Fee - $ 538 $ 1,037 52% $ - $ - $ - 52% $ 539 $ - $ - $ - 51 Mills Act - Application Flat Fee 3 $ 258 $ 4,889 5% 14,667 $ $ 773 $ 13,893 30% 1,467 $ $ 4,400 $ 3,627 $ 10,267 52 Mills Act - Contract Preparation Flat Fee 2 $ 1,034 $ 4,889 21% 9,778 $ $ 2,068 $ 7,710 30% 1,467 $ $ 2,933 $ 866 $ 6,844 53 Mills Act - Contract Monitoring Flat Fee - $ 1,034 $ 626 165% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 626 $ - $ - $ - 54 Notice of Exemption Flat Fee 5 $ 258 $ 558 46% 2,792 $ $ 1,289 $ 1,502 50% $ 279 $ 1,396 $ 107 $ 1,396 55 Certificate of Appropriateness - Over-the-Counter Flat Fee - $ 258 $ 718 36% $ - $ - $ - 50% $ 359 $ - $ - $ - 56 Abandoned Shopping Cart Prevention Plan Flat Fee - $ 3,114 $ 2,325 134% $ - $ - $ - 100% 2,325 $ $ - $ - $ - 57 Modification of Shopping Cart Prevention Plan Flat Fee - $ 492 $ 368 134% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 368 $ - $ - $ - 58 Design Review - Minor Flat Fee - $ - $ 4,243 0% $ - $ - $ - 30% 1,273 $ $ - $ - $ - 59 SB-9 - Lot Split New Fee - $ - $ 3,881 0% $ - $ - $ - 60% 2,328 $ $ - $ - $ - 60 SB-9 - Two Unit Development New Fee - $ - $ 3,881 0% $ - $ - $ - 60% 2,328 $ $ - $ - $ - 61 SB-9 Lot Split and Two Unit Development New Fee - $ - $ 5,897 0% $ - $ - $ - 70% 4,128 $ $ - $ - $ - 62 Street Vender - Permit New Fee - $ - $ 347 0% $ - $ - $ - 50% $ 173 $ - $ - $ - Recommendations
City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Planning Division
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals

Page 1159 of 1570 ends

PAGE 26
Water Department
No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
1 WATER CHARGES
2 Disinfection /Bacteriological Testing Flat fee 4 $ 435 $ 1,345 32% 5,378 $ $ 1,740 $ 3,638 100% 1,345 $ $ 5,378 $ 3,638 $ - 3 Pipeline cost: (per linear foot per flush) Flat fee
4 up to 14" Line Flat fee 3 $ 1 $ 2 43% $ 7 $ 3 $ 4 100% $ 2 $ 7 $ 4 $ - 5 14" Line and larger Flat fee - $ 2 $ 5 44% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 5 $ - $ - $ - 6 Tie-in inspection (per tie-in) Flat fee 12 $ 388 $ 1,104 35% 13,248 $ $ 4,656 $ 8,592 100% 1,104 $ $ 13,248 $ 8,592 $ - 7 Developer water service to unbuilt lots fee - City System per lot (5,000 sqft) Flat fee - $ 30 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 30 $ - $ - $ - 8 Developer water service to unbuilt lots fee - Green Valley / Lakes System per lot (5,000 sqft) Flat fee - $ 64 $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 64 $ - $ - $ - 9 WATER FIELD SERVICE CHARGES
10 Charge for miscellaneous repairs due to customer action or neglect per hour Flat fee - $ 243 $ 289 84% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 289 $ - $ - $ - 11 NEW SERVICE INSTALLATION CHARGES
12 Tap and Meter Set (does not include backflow device) Contractor to excavate and restore surfaces.
13 up to 1-inch tap and meter set Flat fee 13 $ 2,483 $ 3,397 73% 44,164 $ $ 32,279 $ 11,885 100% 3,397 $ $ 44,164 $ 11,885 $ - 14 1-1/2" inch tap and meter set Flat fee 3 $ 4,221 $ 5,489 77% 16,466 $ $ 12,663 $ 3,803 100% 5,489 $ $ 16,466 $ 3,803 $ - 15 2-inch tap and meter set Flat fee 2 $ 4,774 $ 6,229 77% 12,459 $ $ 9,548 $ 2,911 100% 6,229 $ $ 12,459 $ 2,911 $ - 16 3-inch tap and meter sets Flat fee - $ 5,701 $ 7,196 79% $ - $ - $ - 100% 7,196 $ $ - $ - $ - 17 4-inch tap and meter sets Flat fee - $ 7,197 $ 9,198 78% $ - $ - $ - 100% 9,198 $ $ - $ - $ - 18 6-inch tap and meter sets Flat fee - $ 10,178 $ 13,192 77% $ - $ - $ - 100% 13,192 $ $ - $ - $ - 19 8-inch tap and meter sets Flat fee - $ 15,621 $ 19,621 80% $ - $ - $ - 100% 19,621 $ $ - $ - $ - 20 10-inch tap and meter sets Flat fee - $ 19,730 $ 24,258 81% $ - $ - $ - 100% 24,258 $ $ - $ - $ - 21 12-inch tap and meter sets Actual cost - 100% $ -
22 Meter Set
23 Meter Upsizing to 3/4 inch - NEW Actual cost - 100% $ - 24 up to 1-inch meter set Flat fee 27 $ 1,219 $ 1,045 117% 28,208 $ $ 32,913 $ (4,705) 100% 1,045 $ $ 28,208 $ (4,705) $ - 25 1-1/2 inch meter set Flat fee - $ 3,058 $ 3,976 77% $ - $ - $ - 100% 3,976 $ $ - $ - $ - 26 2-inch meter set Flat fee - $ 4,383 $ 5,472 80% $ - $ - $ - 100% 5,472 $ $ - $ - $ - 27 3-inch and larger meter sets Actual cost - 100% $ -
28 BACKFLOW DEVICES (STANDARD INSTALLATION)
29 Double Check Installation
30 up to 1-inch double check valve Flat fee - $ 1,157 $ 2,286 51% $ - $ - $ - 100% 2,286 $ $ - $ - $ - 31 1-1/2" inch double check valve Flat fee - $ 1,391 $ 2,774 50% $ - $ - $ - 100% 2,774 $ $ - $ - $ - 32 2-inch double check valve Flat fee - $ 1,751 $ 3,527 50% $ - $ - $ - 100% 3,527 $ $ - $ - $ - 33 3-inch or larger double check valve Actual cost - 100% $ - 34 Reduced Pressure Installation
35 3/4" reduced pressure Flat fee 10 100% $ -
36 1-inch reduced pressure Flat fee 6 100% $ -
37 1-1/2" inch reduced pressure Flat fee 3 100% $ -
38 2-inch reduced pressure Flat fee 2 100% $ -
39 3-inch or larger reduced pressure Actual cost - 100% $ - 40 Double Detector Check Valve Installation
41 3-inch or larger double detector check valve Actual cost 3 Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee 100% Actual Cost Fee $ - Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Actual Cost Fee - Proposed
Recommendations
City of Vallejo
Water Department
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals
Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee

Page 1160 of 1570 ends

PAGE 27
No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
42 Monthly Fee for Annual Backflow Device (Standard Installation) testing, inspection, repair or replacement cost (10 year) 43 3/4" double check valve Flat fee - $ 10 $ 14 70% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 14 $ - $ - $ - 44 1" double check valve Flat fee - $ 10 $ 14 70% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 14 $ - $ - $ - 45 1-1/2" double check valve Flat fee - $ 10 $ 14 70% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 14 $ - $ - $ - 46 2'" double check valve Flat fee - $ 11 $ 14 76% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 14 $ - $ - $ - 47 3" double check valve Flat fee - $ 22 $ 16 135% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 16 $ - $ - $ - 48 4" double check valve Flat fee - $ 24 $ 31 79% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 31 $ - $ - $ - 49 6" double check valve Flat fee - $ 33 $ 32 103% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 32 $ - $ - $ - 50 8" double check valve Flat fee - $ 57 $ 36 158% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 36 $ - $ - $ - 51 10" double check valve Flat fee - $ 82 $ 41 202% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 41 $ - $ - $ - 52 3/4" reduced pressure to 2" Flat fee - $ 12 $ 28 42% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 28 $ - $ - $ - 53 3" reduced pressure Flat fee - $ 25 $ 31 82% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 31 $ - $ - $ - 54 4" reduced pressure Flat fee - $ 30 $ 31 95% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 31 $ - $ - $ - 55 6" reduced pressure Flat fee - $ 42 $ 33 125% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 33 $ - $ - $ - 56 8" reduced pressure Flat fee - $ 73 $ 39 188% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 39 $ - $ - $ - 57 10" reduced pressure Flat fee - $ 92 $ 42 219% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 42 $ - $ - $ - 58 3" double detector Flat fee - $ 22 $ 30 73% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 30 $ - $ - $ - 59 4" double detector Flat fee - $ 24 $ 31 79% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 31 $ - $ - $ - 60 6" double detector Flat fee - $ 33 $ 32 103% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 32 $ - $ - $ - 61 8" double detector Flat fee - $ 57 $ 36 158% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 36 $ - $ - $ - 62 10" double detector Flat fee - $ 82 $ 41 202% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 41 $ - $ - $ - 63 Monthly Fee for Backflow Device (Non-Standard Installation) 64 Customer Required Testing Notification Letter Fee Flat fee - $ 3 $ 10 30% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 10 $ - $ - $ - 65 CHARGES RELATED TO DELINQUENCY SHUT-OFF AND UNAUTHORIZED TURN-ON:
66 Lock box installation, 1st occurrence Flat fee 36 $ 262 $ 504 52% 18,135 $ $ 9,432 $ 8,703 100% $ 504 $ 18,135 $ 8,703 $ - 67 2nd occurrence Flat fee 3 $ 452 $ 468 97% 1,404 $ $ 1,356 $ 48 100% $ 468 $ 1,404 $ 48 $ - 68 Each Add'l occurrence Flat fee - $ 574 $ 468 123% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 468 $ - $ - $ - 69 Lock box repair/replacement Actual cost - 100% $ -
70 Meter removal Less than or equal to 1" Actual cost 4 100% $ - 71 Meter removal Greater than 1" Actual cost - 100% $ - 72 Meter reinstallation Actual cost 2 100% $ -
73 Water service turn-on Actual cost 1 100% $ -
74 Jumper removal Actual cost 1 100% $ -
75 Capping of service to stop water theft (Kill tap at the main) Actual cost - 100% $ - 76 Removal of cap and install new service Actual cost - 100% $ - 77 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES
78 Meter test for 5/8" inch to 1-1/2 inch (in shop) Flat fee - $ 254 $ 471 54% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 471 $ - $ - $ - 79 Meter test for 2-inch and larger (in field) Flat fee - $ 364 $ 1,156 31% $ - $ - $ - 100% 1,156 $ $ - $ - $ - 80 Construction Pre -Tie in analysis (CIP pressure test) Flat fee - $ 388 $ 900 43% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 900 $ - $ - $ - 81 Fire hydrant flow test Flat fee 19 $ 634 $ 1,142 56% 21,697 $ $ 12,046 $ 9,651 100% 1,142 $ $ 21,697 $ 9,651 $ - 82 Finance Fee 1.5% per mo 466 100% $ -
83 Delinquency Penalty 10% per mo 510 100% $ -
84 Water shutoff fee Flat fee 132 100% $ -
City of Vallejo
Water Department
FY25
Current Conditions Annual Totals Recommendations
Penalty set at $151 Penalty set at $151 Penalty set at $151 Actual Cost Fee

1.5% per month
10% per month

1.5% per month
10% per month
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee
Actual Cost Fee

Page 1161 of 1570 ends

PAGE 28
No. Service Name Fee Description Annual Demand Fee Cost Recovery % Cost Revenue Subsidy Target
Recovery %
Fee @ Policy
Level
Annual
Revenue
Increased
Revenue Subsidy
85 Water Service Security Deposit
86 Residential sfd Flat fee 180 100% $ -
87 Multifamily/Commercial 2x avg bill; min $300 5 100% $ - 88 Water engineering services Flat fee - 100% $ -
89 Meter obstruction penalty Actual cost 16 100% $ -
90 Customer Damage to Water Meter (labor plus cost of new meter) Unit Price plus Labor 3 100% $ - 91 ILLEGAL Turn-On Penalty Flat fee 74 100% $ -
92 Meter Removal Obstruction Fee Flat fee - 100% $ -
93 Customer Requested Meter Re-Read, 1st occurrence free, 2nd occurrence within 12 months $46 Flat fee 2 $ 46 $ - 0% $ - $ 92 $ (92) 100% $ 46 $ 92 $ - $ - 94 New Account Setup with Same Day Turn-On (if available, within Regular business hours) Flat fee 118 $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - $ - 95 Illegal Turn On Administrative Penalty - 1st Offense Flat fee - 100% $ - 96 Illegal Turn On Administrative Penalty - 2nd Offense Flat fee - 100% $ - 97 Illegal Turn On Administrative Penalty - each additional occurrence Flat fee - 100% $ - 98 Water Diversion, Tampering, and/or Theft Flat fee 2 100% $ - 99 Water Meter Lock Tampering Penalty - 1st Offense Flat fee - 100% $ - 100 Water Meter Lock Tampering Penalty - 2nd Offense Flat fee - 100% $ - 101 Water Meter Lock and/or Lock Box Tampering (post water shut off) Flat fee - 100% $ - 102 Water Theft Prevention Device Within Water Pipes (blind washer) Flat fee - 100% $ - 103 TAPPING FEES
104 4"-12" tap Flat fee 5 $ 1,139 $ 1,251 91% 6,254 $ $ 5,695 $ 559 100% 1,251 $ $ 6,254 $ 559 $ - 105 Larger than 12" tap Actual cost - 100% $ -
106 WATER ENGINEERING FEES
107 Development Agreement - New Flat fee - $ - $ 599 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 599 $ - $ - $ - 108 General Plan Update - New Flat fee - $ 20 $ 599 3% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 599 $ - $ - $ - 109 Minor Use Permit - New Flat fee - $ - $ 492 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 492 $ - $ - $ - 110 Accessory Dwelling Unit - New Flat fee - $ - $ 492 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 492 $ - $ - $ - 111 Planned Development - New Flat fee - $ - $ 1,337 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 1,337 $ $ - $ - $ - 112 Planned Development - (Amendment) - New Flat fee - $ - $ 546 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 546 $ - $ - $ - 113 Preliminary Review (Inside City) - New Flat fee - $ 409 $ 1,688 24% $ - $ - $ - 100% 1,688 $ $ - $ - $ - 114 Preliminary Review (Outside City) - New Flat fee - $ - $ 2,284 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 2,284 $ $ - $ - $ - 115 Preliminary Review (School/Hospital) - New Flat fee - $ - $ 2,284 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 2,284 $ $ - $ - $ - 116
Development Review - Major (Staff Level) (Large Multi-Family, Demolition) - New Flat fee - $ - $ 7,084 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 7,084 $ $ - $ - $ - 117 Development Review - Major (PC Public Hearing) - New Flat fee - $ - $ 733 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 733 $ - $ - $ - 118 Development Review - SB 35 and/or Density Bonus - New Flat fee - $ - $ 6,189 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 6,189 $ $ - $ - $ - 119
Development Review - Minor (Single/Multi Family, Tenant Improvements) - New Flat fee - $ - $ 3,095 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 3,095 $ $ - $ - $ - 120 Lot Line Adjustment - New Flat fee - $ - $ 492 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 492 $ - $ - $ - 121 Parcel Map - New Flat fee - $ - $ 1,230 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 1,230 $ $ - $ - $ - 122 Parcel Map Amendment - New Flat fee - $ - $ 492 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% $ 492 $ - $ - $ - 123 Tentative Map 5-20 lots - New Flat fee - $ - $ 4,303 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 4,303 $ $ - $ - $ - 124 Tentative Map 20 + lots - New Flat fee - $ - $ 10,278 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 10,278 $ $ - $ - $ - 125 Tentative Map Amendment - New Flat fee - $ - $ 4,391 0% $ - $ - $ - 100% 4,391 $ $ - $ - $ - City of Vallejo
Water Department
FY25
Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee
Penalty set at $236
Penalty to be changed from $75 to $150
Penalty to be changed from $117 to $200
Penalty set at $236
Penalty set at $152
Actual Cost Fee
Penalty set at $111
Penalty set at $130
Penalty set at $111
Penalty set at $130
Penalty set at $236
Penalty set at $477
Penalty set at $717
Penalty set at $236
Penalty to be changed from $75 to $150
Penalty to be changed from $117 to $200
Penalty set at $236
Penalty set at $152
Penalty set at $236
Penalty set at $477
Penalty set at $717
Penalty set at $236
Penalty to be changed from $75 to $150
Penalty to be changed from $117 to $200
Penalty set at $236
Penalty set at $152
Penalty set at $111
Penalty set at $130
Penalty set at $236
Penalty set at $477
Penalty set at $717
Unit Price plus Labor Unit Price plus Labor Unit Price plus Labor Penalty set at $58 Penalty set at $58 Penalty set at $58 Deposit to be changed from $300 min to $400
min
Deposit to be changed from $300 min to $400
min
Deposit to be changed from $300 min to $400
min
Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee Actual Cost Fee
Deposit to be changed from $148 to $150 Deposit to be changed from $148 to $150 Deposit to be changed from $148 to $150 Current Conditions Annual Totals Recommendations

Page 1162 of 1570 ends

PAGE 29
Appendix B – Peer Comparison Results
The following pages show the results from the peer comparison for each respective department.

Fire Prevention Division
Activity Current Fee Proposed Fee Concord Fairfield Richmond San Pablo Santa Rosa Vacaville Plan Review and Inspection Services
Automatic fire extinguishing systems $ 823.55
Commercial
Cooking (Hood
and Duct) Fire
Suppression
System - $632
Fire Sprinkler
System - NFPA
13 Base Fee - 1st 25
Heads - $2,026
Base Fee + Each
Additional 25
Head - $263
R2 - $2,917
Base Fee + Each
Unit R2 - $243
$ 251
Commercial
Cooking (Hood
and Duct) Fire
Suppression
System - $632
Fewer than 10 -
$181
automatic fireextinguishing
systems – $522
Fixed fireextinguishing
system - $553
$ 804
Monitoring equipment for sprinkler/alarm systems $ 414.57 $ 632 $ 648 $624.00, plus
$11.00 per
initiating and
notification
device. Includes
two hours of plan
review and up to
one hour of field
inspection time
632 $ 348
New Fire Alarm:
$606
Tenant
Improvement:
$315
Underground fire service main installation $ 823.55 N/A 1 - 4
Hydrant/Riser -
$1,459
5 - 10
Hydrant/Riser -
$2,269
11 or More
Hydrant/Riser -
$2,863
$501, plus $251
per hour for each
additional
inspection. Plus
$125 additional
plan review time,
per half hour.

N/A $ 1,683 $ 1,161
Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems (New Installation) NFPA 13D $ 335.23 N/A Subdivision
Model Homes -
13D (per unit) -
$891
Subdivision
Production
Homes & ADUs -
13D (per unit) -
$292
$1,754.00,
includes one hour
review. Additional
inspections are
$251 per hour
N/A $522 + $4.53 per
sprinkler head
1-25 sprinkler
heads - $311
26-99 sprinkler
heads - $573
100+ sprinkler
heads and 2
hydro areas -
$1,322 plus $2.20
per head over
100

Page 1163 of 1570 ends

PAGE 30
Activity Current Fee Proposed Fee Concord Fairfield Richmond San Pablo Santa Rosa Vacaville Base Fee by Occupancy
R-1 Occupancies up to 20 rooms $ 362.05
$474: plus $4 per
unit for three
stories or more

N/A N/A
$474: plus $4 per
unit for three
stories or more
$219: 3- 10 units
R-1 Occupancies 20+ rooms $ 460.39
$474: plus $4 per
unit for three
stories or more

N/A N/A
$474: plus $4 per
unit for three
stories or more
$367: 11- 40 units
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 3-5 Units Fee $ 452.56
$115: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$405: 1 - 4 units $ 118
$115: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$219: 3- 10 units
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 6-15 units $ 601.18
$115: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$486: 5 - 25 units $ 216
$115: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$367: 11- 40 units
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 16-25 units $ 747.57
$158: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$486: 26 - 100
units $ 264
$158: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$367: 11- 40 units
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 26-60 units $ 895.07
$158: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$567: 26 - 100
units $ 264
$158: plus $3 per
unit for less than
three stories
$367 up to 40 -
$442 up to 50, 51
or more +$426
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 61-100 units $ 1,042.58
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
$567: 26 - 100
units $ 264
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
($426 for first 50,
add’l $75 for each
10 units over 50)
Residential Occupancies: 101-200 units $ 1,238.13
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
$648: 101 - 300
units $ 529
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
($426 for first 50,
add’l $75 for each
10 units over 50)
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 201-300 units $ 1,385.64
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
$648: 101 - 300
units
$529 up to 250,
250+ $880
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
($426 for first 50,
add’l $75 for each
10 units over 50)
R-2 Residential Occupancies: 301-400+ units $ 1,533.13
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
$729: 301+ units $ 880
$158: plus $4 per
unit for less than
three stories
($426 for first 50,
add’l $75 for each
10 units over 50)
I-4 Occupancies Day Care Facilities $ 460.00 $ 316
7 to 49 Persons -
$648
50 - 149 Persons -
$729
150 Persons or
More - $810
$251 base fee,
plus per
unit/occupant $5
$ 316 $ 253
15% of Building
Permit fee

Page 1164 of 1570 ends

PAGE 31
Activity Current Fee Proposed Fee Concord Fairfield Richmond San Pablo Santa Rosa Vacaville Fire Safety Inspections
High-piled combustible storage $ 1,125.27
Up to 5,000 sq ft -
$ 632.00
More than 5,000
sq ft - $948.00
500 - 10,000 sq ft
- $567
10,001 - 20,000
sq ft - $729
20,001 - 50,000
sq ft - $972
> 50,000 sq ft
area - base fee -
$1,134
Each additional
sq ft - $81
5000 sq ft or less
$ 496.00, each
additional 5000
sq ft or fraction
thereof $312
Up to 5,000 sq ft -
$ 632.00
More than 5,000
sq ft - $948.00
$ 504 $ 603
Lumber yards $ 230.67 $ 632 $ 810 $ 501 $ 632 $ 592 $ 419 Places of Assembly $ 460.39
Occupancy load
50-100 $ 395.00
Occupancy load
101-200 $ 632.00
Occupancy load
201-299 $ 632.00
Occupancy load
300 + - $948
50 - 99 Persons -
$648
100 - 299
Persons - $729
300 or More
Persons - $891
With Stage
$1,000
Without Stage
300+ occupant
load $519
Without Stage
>300 occupant
load $501
Occupancy load
50-100 $ 395.00
Occupancy load
101-200 $ 632.00
Occupancy load
201-299 $ 632.00
Occupancy load
300 + - $948
Less than 300
persons: $219
300 or more
persons: $504
$ 340
Group E occupancies $ 312.88
Occupant load
less than 50. $
395.00
Occupant load 50-
149. $ 632.00
Occupant load
150-499. $
632.00
Occupant load
500 or greater. $
948.00
7 to 49 Persons -
$648
50 - 149 Persons -
$729
150 Persons or
More - $810
Ocupant load
less than 50
$312.00;
Occupant load 50-
149 $438.00;
Occupant load
150-499 $519.00;
Occupant load
500 or more
$624.00
Occupant load
less than 50. $
395.00
Occupant load 50-
149. $ 632.00
Occupant load
150-499. $
632.00
Occupant load
500 or greater. $
948.00
Institutional 25 or
more persons:
$362
Institutional/reside
ntial care facility -
7 - 49 : $420
Institutional/reside
ntial care facility -
50+: $672
Special
Inspection Fee
$315 per hour
Tents and Air-Supported structures $ 604.54
401 sq. ft. to 699
sq. ft. $ 158.00
700 sq. ft. to
5,000 sq. ft. $
316.00
More than 5,000
sq. ft. $ 474.00
400 - 3,000 sq ft -
$405
3,001 - 10,000 sq
ft - $486
10,001 or more
sq ft - $648
399 - 699 square
feet $125
699-4,199 sq feet
$251
5000+ sq feet
$376
401 sq. ft. to 699
sq. ft. $ 158.00
700 sq. ft. to
5,000 sq. ft. $
316.00
More than 5,000
sq. ft. $ 474.00
>400 sq. ft. (1.5
hrs min.) each -
$271
>400 sq. ft. Less
than 5 business
days notice. Each
(1.5 hrs min.) -
$542
Tent, canopy and
temporary
membrane
structure (5,000
sq. ft. or less)
$205
Tent, canopy and
temporary
membrane
structure (over
5,000 sq. ft.)
$251

Page 1165 of 1570 ends

PAGE 32
Planning and Development Services Department – Building Division Activity Current Fee Proposed Fee Concord Fairfield Richmond San Pablo Santa Rosa Vacaville Residential re-roof permit (2 Inspections) $ 246 $ 654 $ 242 $ 274 Fee not listed $ 397 $ 290 Fee not listed Residential multi-family re-roof permit (2 Inspections per building) $ 246 $ 654 $ 242 $ 274 Fee not listed $ 915 $ 676 Fee not listed Residential swimming pool permit $ 942 $ 1,517 $ 1,077 $ 537 Fee not listed $ 2,022 $ 1,448 $ 71 Water heater replacement (same type and same location) $ 141 $ 381 $ 186 $ 117 $ 159 $ 208 $ 166 $ 71 Decks or trellis permits - Less than 500 sq. ft. (no electrical) $ 412 $ 583 Fee not listed $ 383 Fee not listed $ 689 $ 241 Fee not listed Decks or trellis permits over 500 sq. ft. $35 + $0.87/sqft $ 899 Fee not listed $ 411 Fee not listed $ 768 $ 241 Fee not listed Valuation-based permits $100,001 - $500,000 $1,438.66 + $6.90 for each
additional $1,000
above $100,001
$2,993.38 +
$20.40 for each
additional $1,000
above $100,001
$ 2,207 $ 1,241 $ 3,466
N/A - Building
permit fees based
on size (sq ft)
N/A - Building
permit fees based
on size (sq ft)
$ 819

Page 1166 of 1570 ends

PAGE 33
Planning and Development Services Department – Planning Division Activity Current Fee Proposed Fee Concord Fairfield Richmond San Pablo Santa Rosa Vacaville Development Review - Major (Staff Level) $ 5,513 $ 5,504 $ 2,500 $ 8,047 $ 7,081 $ 4,715 $ 14,312 $ 4,168 Development Review - Major (PC Public Hearing) $ 3,000 $ 6,660 $ 6,500 $ 8,047 $ 7,081 $ 4,715 $ 14,312 $ 9,070 Development Review - Minor $ 824 $ 1,233 $ 1,000 $ 10,351 $ 1,635 $ 2,185 $ 9,500 $ 2,071 Exceptions $ 2,275 $ 2,755 $ 1,169 Fee not listed Fee not listed Fee not listed Fee not listed $ 3,052 Appeal to Commission/Board plus noticing fee $ 803 $ 3,260 $ 138 $ 4,128 $ 500 $ 4,771 $ 9,393 $ 666 Landscape Review (WELO) - Existing Residence
$ 461 N/A Fee not listed Fee not listed
Valuation-Based
Fee + Contractor
Costs
Fee not listed $ 972 No fee listed
Landscape Review (WELO) - All Other
$ 1,385 N/A Fee not listed Fee not listed
Valuation-Based
Fee + Contractor
Costs
$ 1,986 $ 972 $ 2,105
Sign Permits - Over-the-Counter $ 166 $ - $ 110 Fee not listed $ 385 $ 394 $ 559 No fee listed Sign Permits - All Others $ 428 $ 878 $ 660 $ 454 $ 1,218 $ 394 $ 1,677 $ 79 Sign Master Plan/Program $ 2,174 $ 2,787 $ 1,100 $ 2,076 $ 3,500 $ 794 $ 3,261 $ 2,685 Zoning Compliance Review-Minor (Over the Counter Plan Check) $ 66 $ 133 Fee not listed $ 227 $ 69 Fee not listed $ 372 No fee listed Zoning Compliance Review - Major (Not Over the Counter/Plan Check) $ 269 $ 430 Fee not listed $ 227 $ 915 Fee not listed $ 372 No fee listed

Page 1167 of 1570 ends

PAGE 34
Water Department
Activity Current Fee Proposed Fee Concord Fairfield Richmond San Pablo Santa Rosa Vacaville Lock box installation, 1st occurrence $ 262 $ 504 No fee No fee $ 81 $ 81 Pending Fee Pending Fee Lock box installation, 2nd occurrence $ 452 $ 468 No fee No fee $ 131 $ 131 Pending Fee Pending Fee Lock box installation, Each add'l occurrence $ 574 $ 468 No fee No fee $ 131 $ 131 Pending Fee Pending Fee Lock box repair/replacement Actual Cost Actual Cost No fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee $ 52 $ 109 Meter removal (≤1″) Actual Cost Actual Cost Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee $ 124 Meter reinstallation Actual Cost Actual Cost Pending Fee Pending Fee $ 463 $ 463 $ 368 $ 842 Water service turn-on Actual Cost Actual Cost $ 74 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 55 $ 83 Jumper removal Actual Cost Actual Cost Pending Fee No fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Capping of service to stop water theft (Kill tap at the main) Actual Cost Actual Cost Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee $ 404 Pending Fee Removal of cap and install new service Actual Cost Actual Cost Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee Pending Fee

Page 1168 of 1570 ends

PAGE 35
Appendix C – Implementation Schedules
The following pages show the phased implementation schedules for each respective department.

Planning and Development Services Department – Building Division

Page 1169 of 1570 ends

PAGE 36
No. Service Name
Current
Fee
Current
Recovery Level
Full
Cost
Target
Recovery
Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Rounded
Fee Increase
($)
Fee Increase
(%)
Fee in Year One
Not Rounded
Fee in Year One
Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Not Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Not Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Rounded
1 California Building Standards Fee
2 Project Valuation
3 $1-25,000 $ 1.00 0% $ - 100% $ 1.00 $ 1 $ - 0% $ 1.00 $ 1 $ 1.00 $ 1 $ 1.00 $ 1 4 $25,001-50,000 $ 2.00 0% $ - 100% $ 2.00 $ 2 $ - 0% $ 2.00 $ 2 $ 2.00 $ 2 $ 2.00 $ 2 5 $50,001-75,000 $ 3.00 0% $ - 100% $ 3.00 $ 3 $ - 0% $ 3.00 $ 3 $ 3.00 $ 3 $ 3.00 $ 3 6 $75,001-100,000 $ 4.00 0% $ - 100% $ 4.00 $ 4 $ - 0% $ 4.00 $ 4 $ 4.00 $ 4 $ 4.00 $ 4 7 $100,000 + (each addtl' $25,000) $ 1.00 0% $ - 100% $ 1.00 $ 1 $ - 0% $ 1.00 $ 1 $ 1.00 $ 1 $ 1.00 $ 1 8 Strong Motion Instrumentation Program
9 Project Valuation Construction Type
10 Residential (minimum charge $0.50) (Fee is per $100,000) $ 13.00 0% $ - 100% 13.00 $ $ 13 $ - 0% $ 13.00 $ 13 $ 13.00 $ 13 $ 13.00 $ 13 11 Commercial (minimum charge $0.50) (Fee is per $100,000) $ 28.00 0% $ - 100% 28.00 $ $ 28 $ - 0% $ 28.00 $ 28 $ 28.00 $ 28 $ 28.00 $ 28 12 Miscellaneous Administration Fee
13 Application Processing Fee $ 35.00 26% 135.40 $ 80% 108.32 $ $ 108 $ 73.32 209% $ 59.44 $ 59 $ 83.88 $ 84 $ 108.32 $ 108 14 Permit Extension Request Review Fee $ 93.87 30% 316.94 $ 80% 253.55 $ $ 254 $ 159.68 170% $ 147.10 $ 147 $ 200.32 $ 200 $ 253.55 $ 254 15 New - Expired Permits Less Than One Year
Penalty - 25%
of Original
Permit Fee 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
Penalty - 25%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 25%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 25%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 25%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 25%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 25%
of Original
Permit Fee
16 New - Expired Permits Over One Year up to Five Years Penalty - 50%
of Original
Permit Fee 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
Penalty - 50%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 50%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 50%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 50%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 50%
of Original
Permit Fee
Penalty - 50%
of Original
Permit Fee
17 New - Expired Permits Over Five Years
New Permit
Required 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
New Permit
Required
New Permit
Required
New Permit
Required
New Permit
Required
New Permit
Required
New Permit
Required
18 Plan Check Extension Request Review Fee
19 Building Permit Refunds - 80% of building permit fee, excluding plan check fee (Refund must be requested prior to or within 180 days of permit issuance)
80% of permit,
excluding plan
check fee 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
80% of permit,
excluding plan
check fee
80% of permit,
excluding plan
check fee
80% of permit,
excluding plan
check fee
80% of permit,
excluding plan
check fee
80% of permit,
excluding plan
check fee
80% of permit,
excluding plan
check fee
20 Duplicate Permit Card Fee $ 21.23 28% 74.92 $ 80% 59.94 $ $ 60 $ 38.71 182% $ 34.13 $ 34 $ 47.03 $ 47 $ 59.94 $ 60 21 Plan Re-issuance Fee (official copy creation, does not include copy cost) $ 93.87 63% 149.84 $ 80% 119.87 $ $ 120 $ 26.00 28% $ 102.54 $ 103 $ 111.21 $ 111 $ 119.87 $ 120 22 Official Certificate of Occupancy Certificate $ 45.82 38% 120.20 $ 80% 96.16 $ $ 96 $ 50.34 110% $ 62.60 $ 63 $ 79.38 $ 79 $ 96.16 $ 96 23 Inspection Fees
24 Business Compliance Inspection $ 222.73 48% 461.54 $ 80% 369.23 $ $ 369 $ 146.50 66% $ 271.56 $ 272 $ 320.40 $ 320 $ 369.23 $ 369 25 Certified Access Specialist Program (CASp) Certificate $ 12.29 4% 301.73 $ 80% 241.39 $ $ 241 $ 229.10 1864% $ 88.66 $ 89 $ 165.02 $ 165 $ 241.39 $ 241 26 Certified Access Specialist Program (CASp) Consultation and Inspection $ 1,510.79 30% 5,057.60 $ 80% 4,046.08 $ $ 4,046 $ 2,535.29 168% $ 2,355.89 $ 2,356 $ 3,200.98 $ 3,201 $ 4,046.08 $ 4,046 27 New - Yearly review of qualification to be included in special inspection program $ - 0% 875. $ 92 80% 700.73 $ $ 701 $ 700.73 0% $ 467.16 $ 467 $ 583.95 $ 584 $ 700.73 $ 701 28 Special Inspection - Covers 1 Hour of Inspection $ - 0% 422.58 $ 80% 338.06 $ $ 338 $ 338.06 0% $ 225.37 $ 225 $ 281.72 $ 282 $ 338.06 $ 338 29 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 341.34 $ 80% 273.07 $ $ 273 $ 273.07 0% $ 182.05 $ 182 $ 227.56 $ 228 $ 273.07 $ 273 30 Permit Fee for Inspections of Work Completed Without Permit 2x original
permit 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
2x original
permit
2x original
permit
2x original
permit
2x original
permit
2x original
permit
2x original
permit
31 Permit Fee for Inspections of Work Completed Without Permit for Subsidy Program Projects
4x original
permit 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
4x original
permit
4x original
permit
4x original
permit
4x original
permit
4x original
permit
4x original
permit
32 Plan Review Fee
33 Life Safety Plan Review
70% -
Percentage
based fee 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
70% -
Percentage
based fee
70% -
Percentage
based fee
70% -
Percentage
based fee
70% -
Percentage
based fee
70% -
Percentage
based fee
70% -
Percentage
based fee
34 Plan Check Extension Request Review Fee $ 93.87 29% 325.96 $ 80% 260.77 $ $ 261 $ 166.90 178% $ 149.50 $ 150 $ 205.14 $ 205 $ 260.77 $ 261 35 Deferred Submittal Request Fee - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ 204.00 37% 549.80 $ 80% 439.84 $ $ 440 $ 235.84 116% $ 282.61 $ 283 $ 361.23 $ 361 $ 439.84 $ 440 36 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 37 Plan Review Alternative Methods and Materials Review Fee - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ 204.00 28% 740. $ 52 80% 592.42 $ $ 592 $ 388.42 190% $ 333.47 $ 333 $ 462.94 $ 463 $ 592.42 $ 592 38 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 39 Plan Review of Soils Report - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ 204.00 37% 549.80 $ 80% 439.84 $ $ 440 $ 235.84 116% $ 282.61 $ 283 $ 361.23 $ 361 $ 439.84 $ 440 40 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 41 Plan Review Consultation with Design Professionals - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ 204.00 37% 549. $ 80 80% 439.84 $ $ 440 $ 235.84 116% $ 282.61 $ 283 $ 361.23 $ 361 $ 439.84 $ 440 42 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Building Division
FY25
Three-Year Phased User Fee Increase Schedule

Page 1170 of 1570 ends

PAGE 37
No. Service Name
Current
Fee
Current
Recovery Level
Full
Cost
Target
Recovery
Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Rounded
Fee Increase
($)
Fee Increase
(%)
Fee in Year One
Not Rounded
Fee in Year One
Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Not Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Not Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Rounded
43 Revision to Permit/Plans, Additional plan review required by changes, additions or revisions to plans - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ 204.00 37% 549. $ 80 80% 439.84 $ $ 440 $ 235.84 116% $ 282.61 $ 283 $ 361.23 $ 361 $ 439.84 $ 440 44 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 45 Applicant Request for Outside Consultants for Plan Checking and Inspections, or both - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ - 0% 687. $ 19 100% 687.19 $ $ 687 $ 687.19 0% $ 458.13 $ 458 $ 572.66 $ 573 $ 687.19 $ 687 46 Title 24 Energy Conservation Review (calculated as a % of the original Bldg Pmt) $ - 0% 549. $ 80 100% 549.80 $ $ 550 $ 549.80 0% $ 366.53 $ 367 $ 458.17 $ 458 $ 549.80 $ 550 47 Disable Access Review $ - 0% 549.80 $ 100% 549.80 $ $ 550 $ 549.80 0% $ 366.53 $ 367 $ 458.17 $ 458 $ 549.80 $ 550 48 CALGreen Building Standards Review $ - 0% 549.80 $ 100% 549.80 $ $ 550 $ 549.80 0% $ 366.53 $ 367 $ 458.17 $ 458 $ 549.80 $ 550 49 Single-Family Subdivision Production Home Plan Review $ 376.58 39% 964.20 $ 80% 771.36 $ $ 771 $ 394.78 105% $ 508.17 $ 508 $ 639.77 $ 640 $ 771.36 $ 771 50 Expedited Plan Review (additional 50% cost above regular plan check fees) $ - 0% 135.40 $ 100% 135.40 $ $ 135 $ 135.40 0% $ 45.13 $ 45 $ 90.27 $ 90 $ 135.40 $ 135 51 Permit Fees
52 Demolition Permits: Demolition valuation based per Table 1A $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 53 Demolition (per building) additional fees may apply $ 721.70 79% 908.76 $ 80% 727.01 $ $ 727 $ 5.31 1% $ 723.47 $ 723 $ 725.24 $ 725 $ 727.01 $ 727 54 Residential Solar Permits - State Mandated Fees
55 Residential Solar Plan Review $ 138.00 68% 203.67 $ 68% 138.49 $ $ 138 $ 0.49 0% $ 138.16 $ 138 $ 138.33 $ 138 $ 138.49 $ 138 56 Residential Solar 15kW or Less $ 309.00 38% 818.07 $ 38% 310.87 $ $ 311 $ 1.87 1% $ 309.62 $ 310 $ 310.24 $ 310 $ 310.87 $ 311 57 Residential Solar Permit, per kW above 15 kW $ 51.28 90% 57.00 $ 90% 51.30 $ $ 51 $ 0.02 0% $ 51.29 $ 51 $ 51.30 $ 51 $ 51.30 $ 51 58 New - Residential Solar Remove and Reinstall Existing Panels Same Location to Allow for Reroof Under Separate Permit $ - 0% 476. $ 74 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 381.39 0% $ 254.26 $ 254 $ 317.82 $ 318 $ 381.39 $ 381 59 Commercial Solar Permits - State Mandated Fees
60 Commercial Solar Plan Review $ 323.00 59% 549.80 $ 59% 324.38 $ $ 324 $ 1.38 0% $ 323.46 $ 323 $ 323.92 $ 324 $ 324.38 $ 324 61 Commercial Solar 50kW or Less $ 673.00 58% 1,159.41 $ 58% 672.46 $ $ 672 $ (0.54) 0% $ 672.82 $ 673 $ 672.64 $ 673 $ 672.46 $ 672 62 Commercial Solar 51kW to 250kW, per kW $ 42.52 26% 166.57 $ 26% 43.31 $ $ 43 $ 0.79 2% $ 42.78 $ 43 $ 43.05 $ 43 $ 43.31 $ 43 63 Commercial Solar, each kW above 250kW $ 40.00 24% 166.57 $ 24% 39.98 $ $ 40 $ (0.02) 0% $ 39.99 $ 40 $ 39.99 $ 40 $ 39.98 $ 40 64 Commercial Ground Mount Solar Piers/Foundation Permit $ - 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 65 New - Commercial Solar Remove and Reinstall Existing Panels Same Location to Allow for Reroof Under Separate Permit $ - 0% 854. $ 60 80% 683.68 $ $ 684 $ 683.68 0% $ 455.79 $ 456 $ 569.74 $ 570 $ 683.68 $ 684 66 Pool/Spa Permits
67 Residential swimming pool/spa or Hot tub plan review - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ 187.73 45% 414. $ 40 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 143.79 77% $ 235.66 $ 236 $ 283.59 $ 284 $ 331.52 $ 332 68 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 69 Residential swimming pool permit $ 942.38 50% 1,896.24 $ 80% 1,516.99 $ $ 1,517 $ 574.61 61% $ 1,133.92 $ 1,134 $ 1,325.46 $ 1,325 $ 1,516.99 $ 1,517 70 Residential swimming pool remodel permit $ 753.46 62% 1,213.57 $ 80% 970.85 $ $ 971 $ 217.39 29% $ 825.92 $ 826 $ 898.39 $ 898 $ 970.85 $ 971 71 Residential spa or hot tub permit (self-contained above ground) $ 456.32 52% 872.23 $ 80% 697.79 $ $ 698 $ 241.47 53% $ 536.81 $ 537 $ 617.30 $ 617 $ 697.79 $ 698 72 Commercial swimming pool/spa or Hot tub plan review - Covers 2 Hours of Review $ - 0% 828. $ 80 80% 663.04 $ $ 663 $ 663.04 0% $ 442.03 $ 442 $ 552.53 $ 553 $ 663.04 $ 663 73 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 74 Commercial swimming pool/ spa permit $ - 0% 2,389.35 $ 80% 1,911.48 $ $ 1,911 $ 1,911.48 0% $ 1,274.32 $ 1,274 $ 1,592.90 $ 1,593 $ 1,911.48 $ 1,911 75 Re-roof
76 Residential re-roof permit (2 Inspections) $ 245.73 30% 818.07 $ 80% 654.46 $ $ 654 $ 408.73 166% $ 381.97 $ 382 $ 518.22 $ 518 $ 654.46 $ 654 77 Residential multi-family re-roof permit (2 Inspections per building) $ 245.73 30% 818.07 $ 80% 654.46 $ $ 654 $ 408.73 166% $ 381.97 $ 382 $ 518.22 $ 518 $ 654.46 $ 654 78 New - Residential re-roof permit (Max 3 Inspections) with existing solar panel removal and reinstallation same location $ - 0% 1, $ 227.11 80% 981.69 $ $ 982 $ 981.69 0% $ 654.46 $ 654 $ 818.07 $ 818 $ 981.69 $ 982 79 New - Residential multi-family re-roof permit (Max 3 Inspections) with existing solar panel removal and reinstallation same location $ - 0% 1, $ 227.11 80% 981.69 $ $ 982 $ 981.69 0% $ 654.46 $ 654 $ 818.07 $ 818 $ 981.69 $ 982 80 Commercial re-roof permit (3 Inspections), without rooftop equipment HVAC $ 668.43 45% 1,500.75 $ 80% 1,200.60 $ $ 1,201 $ 532.17 80% $ 845.82 $ 846 $ 1,023.21 $ 1,023 $ 1,200.60 $ 1,201 81 Commercial re-roof permit (3 Inspections), with rooftop equipment HVAC $ 881.40 41% 2,130.52 $ 80% 1,704.42 $ $ 1,704 $ 823.02 93% $ 1,155.74 $ 1,156 $ 1,430.08 $ 1,430 $ 1,704.42 $ 1,704 Three-Year Phased User Fee Increase Schedule
City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Building Division
FY25

Page 1171 of 1570 ends

PAGE 38
No. Service Name
Current
Fee
Current
Recovery Level
Full
Cost
Target
Recovery
Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Rounded
Fee Increase
($)
Fee Increase
(%)
Fee in Year One
Not Rounded
Fee in Year One
Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Not Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Not Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Rounded
82 Residential window/ patio door replacements SFD or MFD per dwelling cost. 3 or More (includes plan review) $ 305.79 47% 647. $ 40 80% 517.92 $ $ 518 $ 212.13 69% $ 376.50 $ 377 $ 447.21 $ 447 $ 517.92 $ 518 83 Residential window or door replacement - per window or door $ 125.57 31% 408.47 $ 80% 326.77 $ $ 327 $ 201.20 160% $ 192.64 $ 193 $ 259.71 $ 260 $ 326.77 $ 327 84 Patio covers and Decks
85 Plan review - Covers 2 Hours of Review $ - 0% 828.80 $ 80% 663.04 $ $ 663 $ 663.04 0% $ 442.03 $ 442 $ 552.53 $ 553 $ 663.04 $ 663 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 86 Patio Cover permits Less than 500 sq. ft. (wood or metal construction - no electrical) $ 411.85 57% 728. $ 64 80% 582.91 $ $ 583 $ 171.06 42% $ 468.87 $ 469 $ 525.89 $ 526 $ 582.91 $ 583 87 Decks or trellis permits - Less than 500 sq. ft. (no electrical) $ 411.85 57% 728.64 $ 80% 582.91 $ $ 583 $ 171.06 42% $ 468.87 $ 469 $ 525.89 $ 526 $ 582.91 $ 583 88 Decks or trellis permits over 500 sq. ft. $ 0.87 0% 899.31 $ 100% 899.31 $ $ 899 $ 898.44 103269% $ 600.41 $ 600 $ 750.30 $ 750 $ 899.31 $ 899 89 Plan review for decks or trellises $ 93.87 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (93.87) -100% $ 62.58 $ 63 $ 31.29 $ 31 $ - $ - 90 Sign installation permit
91 Sign permit valuation based per Table 1A
92 Plan review for signs - Covers 30 Minutes of Review $ 93.87 45% 207.20 $ 80% 165.76 $ $ 166 $ 71.89 77% $ 117.83 $ 118 $ 141.80 $ 142 $ 165.76 $ 166 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 93 Painted or illuminated sign permit $ 721.69 77% 935.84 $ 80% 748.68 $ $ 749 $ 26.99 4% $ 730.69 $ 731 $ 739.68 $ 740 $ 748.68 $ 749 94 Monument (painted or illuminated) sign permit $ 1,064.43 74% 1,447.85 $ 80% 1,158.28 $ $ 1,158 $ 93.85 9% $ 1,095.71 $ 1,096 $ 1,127.00 $ 1,127 $ 1,158.28 $ 1,158 95 Cellular Tower Installation permit
96 Plan review (minimum 1 hour, based on valuation table) $ - 0% 1,099.60 $ 80% 879.68 $ $ 880 $ 879.68 0% $ 586.45 $ 586 $ 733.07 $ 733 $ 879.68 $ 880 97 Cellular, free standing Monopole $ - 0% 1,636.14 $ 80% 1,308.92 $ $ 1,309 $ 1,308.92 0% $ 872.61 $ 873 $ 1,090.76 $ 1,091 $ 1,308.92 $ 1,309 98 Cellular on City Property, per location $ 1,410.40 80% 1,771.54 $ 80% 1,417.24 $ $ 1,417 $ 6.84 0% $ 1,412.68 $ 1,413 $ 1,414.96 $ 1,415 $ 1,417.24 $ 1,417 99 Utility Cabinet $ 721.69 73% 990.00 $ 80% 792.00 $ $ 792 $ 70.31 10% $ 745.13 $ 745 $ 768.57 $ 769 $ 792.00 $ 792 100 Manufactured home set-up/installation
101 California Housing and Community Development (HCD) Application fee $ - 0% 99.29 $ 80% 79.43 $ $ 79 $ 79.43 0% $ 52.96 $ 53 $ 66.20 $ 66 $ 79.43 $ 79 102 Plan review - Covers 1 Hour of Review $ - 0% 892.40 $ 80% 713.92 $ $ 714 $ 713.92 0% $ 475.95 $ 476 $ 594.93 $ 595 $ 713.92 $ 714 103 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 414.40 $ 80% 331.52 $ $ 332 $ 331.52 0% $ 221.01 $ 221 $ 276.27 $ 276 $ 331.52 $ 332 104
California Housing and Community Development (HCD) Standard Plan Approval (SPA) foundation. $ - 0% 1, $ 706.68 80% 1,365.35 $ $ 1,365 $ 1,365.35 0% $ 910.23 $ 910 $ 1,137.79 $ 1,138 $ 1,365.35 $ 1,365 105 Non-Standard Plan Approval (SPA), engineered foundation system $ - 0% 1,706.68 $ 80% 1,365.35 $ $ 1,365 $ 1,365.35 0% $ 910.23 $ 910 $ 1,137.79 $ 1,138 $ 1,365.35 $ 1,365 106
MH Site Electrical (Any work on the MH structure should be refered to HCD for permitting) $ 352.32 74% 476. $ 74 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 29.07 8% $ 362.01 $ 362 $ 371.70 $ 372 $ 381.39 $ 381 107
MH Site Plumbing (Any work on the MH structure should be refered to HCD for permitting) $ 352.32 74% 476. $ 74 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 29.07 8% $ 362.01 $ 362 $ 371.70 $ 372 $ 381.39 $ 381 108 Accessory structure $ - 0% 2,069.45 $ 80% 1,655.56 $ $ 1,656 $ 1,655.56 0% $ 1,103.71 $ 1,104 $ 1,379.63 $ 1,380 $ 1,655.56 $ 1,656 109 Commercial Coach, Office or Job Site Trailer set-up/installation $ - 0% 1,728.11 $ 80% 1,382.49 $ $ 1,382 $ 1,382.49 0% $ 921.66 $ 922 $ 1,152.08 $ 1,152 $ 1,382.49 $ 1,382 110 Miscellaneous Electrical
111
Lighting, receptacle, switch additions or replacements (does not include main service change) $ 140.87 30% 476. $ 74 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 240.52 171% $ 221.04 $ 221 $ 301.22 $ 301 $ 381.39 $ 381 112
Temporary power pole/service (request for electrical prior to final inspection) $ 245.73 52% 476. $ 74 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 135.66 55% $ 290.95 $ 291 $ 336.17 $ 336 $ 381.39 $ 381 113 Vehicle charging - Residential $ 411.85 71% 580.34 $ 80% 464.27 $ $ 464 $ 52.42 13% $ 429.32 $ 429 $ 446.80 $ 447 $ 464.27 $ 464 114 Vehicle charging - Commercial $ 1,064.43 78% 1,367.87 $ 80% 1,094.30 $ $ 1,094 $ 29.87 3% $ 1,074.39 $ 1,074 $ 1,084.34 $ 1,084 $ 1,094.30 $ 1,094 115 Restoration of service (1 inspection) $ 245.73 52% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 135.66 55% $ 290.95 $ 291 $ 336.17 $ 336 $ 381.39 $ 381 116 New - Electrical when added to a set fee permit $ - 0% 409.04 $ 80% 327.23 $ $ 327 $ 327.23 0% $ 218.15 $ 218 $ 272.69 $ 273 $ 327.23 $ 327 117 Electrical service meter and/or sub-panel installation 118 Up to 324 amperes $ 245.73 30% 818.07 $ 80% 654.46 $ $ 654 $ 408.73 166% $ 381.97 $ 382 $ 518.22 $ 518 $ 654.46 $ 654 119 325 to 1,000 amperes $ 721.69 56% 1,300.17 $ 80% 1,040.14 $ $ 1,040 $ 318.45 44% $ 827.84 $ 828 $ 933.99 $ 934 $ 1,040.14 $ 1,040 120 Over 1,000 amperes $ 1,064.43 72% 1,484.38 $ 80% 1,187.50 $ $ 1,188 $ 123.07 12% $ 1,105.45 $ 1,105 $ 1,146.48 $ 1,146 $ 1,187.50 $ 1,188 Three-Year Phased User Fee Increase Schedule
FY25
City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Building Division

Page 1172 of 1570 ends

PAGE 39
City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Building Division
FY25
No. Service Name
Current
Fee
Current
Recovery Level
Full
Cost
Target
Recovery
Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Rounded
Fee Increase
($)
Fee Increase
(%)
Fee in Year One
Not Rounded
Fee in Year One
Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Not Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Not Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Rounded
121 Miscellaneous Plumbing
122 Dishwasher, sinks, leak repair, etc. $ 140.87 30% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 240.52 171% $ 221.04 $ 221 $ 301.22 $ 301 $ 381.39 $ 381 123 Water heater replacement (same type and same location) $ 140.87 30% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 240.52 171% $ 221.04 $ 221 $ 301.22 $ 301 $ 381.39 $ 381 124
New - Water heater replacement same location, convert to Heat Pump. (Includes adding 1 electrical circuit) $ - 0% 647. $ 40 80% 517.92 $ $ 518 $ 517.92 0% $ 345.28 $ 345 $ 431.60 $ 432 $ 517.92 $ 518 125 Re-pipe entire residential unit SFD per dwelling cost $ 352.32 43% 818.07 $ 80% 654.46 $ $ 654 $ 302.14 86% $ 453.03 $ 453 $ 553.75 $ 554 $ 654.46 $ 654 126 Restoration of natural gas service (for PGE release) $ 245.73 52% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 135.66 55% $ 290.95 $ 291 $ 336.17 $ 336 $ 381.39 $ 381 127 Tankless Water Heater $ 245.73 38% 647.40 $ 80% 517.92 $ $ 518 $ 272.19 111% $ 336.46 $ 336 $ 427.19 $ 427 $ 517.92 $ 518 128 Commercial Boilers- Refrigerator Units- 4 Ton HVAC Units $ - 0% 1,782.27 $ 80% 1,425.82 $ $ 1,426 $ 1,425.82 0% $ 950.55 $ 951 $ 1,188.18 $ 1,188 $ 1,425.82 $ 1,426 129 New - Plumbing when added to a set fee permit $ - 0% 409.04 $ 80% 327.23 $ $ 327 $ 327.23 0% $ 218.15 $ 218 $ 272.69 $ 273 $ 327.23 $ 327 130 Miscellaneous Mechanical
131 Residential HVAC installation/replacement
132 Furnace, A/C condenser and duct work $ 205.68 25% 818.07 $ 80% 654.46 $ $ 654 $ 448.78 218% $ 355.27 $ 355 $ 504.87 $ 505 $ 654.46 $ 654 133 Furnace and/or A/C condenser only $ 149.87 31% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 231.52 154% $ 227.04 $ 227 $ 304.22 $ 304 $ 381.39 $ 381 134 Wall furnace or Wall Heater Only $ 149.87 31% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 231.52 154% $ 227.04 $ 227 $ 304.22 $ 304 $ 381.39 $ 381 135 Air/Heat Duct Work Only $ 149.87 31% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 231.52 154% $ 227.04 $ 227 $ 304.22 $ 304 $ 381.39 $ 381 136 Commercial HVAC installation/replacement
137 Furnace, A/C condenser and duct work $ 425.59 47% 899.31 $ 80% 719.45 $ $ 719 $ 293.86 69% $ 523.54 $ 524 $ 621.50 $ 622 $ 719.45 $ 719 138 Furnace and/or A/C condenser only $ 377.60 42% 899.31 $ 80% 719.45 $ $ 719 $ 341.85 91% $ 491.55 $ 492 $ 605.50 $ 606 $ 719.45 $ 719 139 Fireplace installation/replacement
140
Prefabricated or metal (U.L. or listed recognized testing agency, EPA approved) $ 376.73 42% 899. $ 31 80% 719.45 $ $ 719 $ 342.72 91% $ 490.97 $ 491 $ 605.21 $ 605 $ 719.45 $ 719 141 Masonry with gas fireplace insert (EPA approved) $ 376.73 42% 899.31 $ 80% 719.45 $ $ 719 $ 342.72 91% $ 490.97 $ 491 $ 605.21 $ 605 $ 719.45 $ 719 142 New - Whole home fan $ - 0% 476.74 $ 80% 381.39 $ $ 381 $ 381.39 0% $ 254.26 $ 254 $ 317.82 $ 318 $ 381.39 $ 381 143 Building Code Violation Inspection Fees
144 Substandard Housing Complaint Inspection - Covers 4 Hours of Inspection $ - 0% 1, $ 461.97 80% 1,169.57 $ $ 1,170 $ 1,169.57 0% $ 779.72 $ 780 $ 974.65 $ 975 $ 1,169.57 $ 1,170 145 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 341.34 $ 80% 273.07 $ $ 273 $ 273.07 0% $ 182.05 $ 182 $ 227.56 $ 228 $ 273.07 $ 273 146 Building Code Board of Appeals Hearing - Covers 4 Hours of Inspection $ - 0% 1,950.76 $ 80% 1,560.61 $ $ 1,561 $ 1,560.61 0% $ 1,040.40 $ 1,040 $ 1,300.51 $ 1,301 $ 1,560.61 $ 1,561 147 Additional Hourly Rate $ - 0% 605.12 $ 80% 484.10 $ $ 484 $ 484.10 0% $ 322.73 $ 323 $ 403.41 $ 403 $ 484.10 $ 484 147 Table 1A Building Permits
148 1 to $2,000 valuation $ 231.44 26% 891.14 $ 80% 712.91 $ $ 713 $ 481.47 208% $ 391.93 $ 392 $ 552.42 $ 552 $ 712.91 $ 713 149 $2,001 to $25,000 valuation $ 231.44 26% 891.14 $ 80% 712.91 $ $ 713 $ 481.47 208% $ 391.93 $ 392 $ 552.42 $ 552 $ 712.91 $ 713 150 $25,001 to $50,000 valuation $ 672.90 33% 2,013.65 $ 80% 1,610.92 $ $ 1,611 $ 938.02 139% $ 985.57 $ 986 $ 1,298.25 $ 1,298 $ 1,610.92 $ 1,611 151 $50,001 to $100,000 valuation $ 1,054.71 48% 2,191.88 $ 80% 1,753.50 $ $ 1,754 $ 698.79 66% $ 1,287.64 $ 1,288 $ 1,520.57 $ 1,521 $ 1,753.50 $ 1,754 152 $100,001 to $500,000 valuation $ 1,438.66 38% 3,744.68 $ 80% 2,995.74 $ $ 2,996 $ 1,557.08 108% $ 1,957.69 $ 1,958 $ 2,476.72 $ 2,477 $ 2,995.74 $ 2,996 153 $500,001 to $1,000,000 valuation $ 4,696.48 34% 13,941.17 $ 80% 11,152.94 $ $ 11,153 $ 6,456.46 137% $ 6,848.63 $ 6,849 $ 9,000.79 $ 9,001 $ 11,152.94 $ 11,153 154 $1,000,001 valuation and up $ 7,702.59 47% 16,314.38 $ 80% 13,051.50 $ $ 13,052 $ 5,348.91 69% $ 9,485.56 $ 9,486 $ 11,268.53 $ 11,269 $ 13,051.50 $ 13,052 155 Mechanical Permit
25% of Building
Permit Fee 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
25% of Building
Permit Fee
25% of Building
Permit Fee
25% of Building
Permit Fee
25% of Building
Permit Fee
25% of Building
Permit Fee
25% of Building
Permit Fee
156 Electrical Permit
20% of Building
Permit Fee 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
20% of Building
Permit Fee
20% of Building
Permit Fee
20% of Building
Permit Fee
20% of Building
Permit Fee
20% of Building
Permit Fee
20% of Building
Permit Fee
157 Plumbing Permit
30% of Building
Permit Fee 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0%
30% of Building
Permit Fee
30% of Building
Permit Fee
30% of Building
Permit Fee
30% of Building
Permit Fee
30% of Building
Permit Fee
30% of Building
Permit Fee
Three-Year Phased User Fee Increase Schedule

Page 1173 of 1570 ends

PAGE 40
City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Building Division
FY25
No. Service Name
Current
Fee
Current
Recovery Level
Full
Cost
Target
Recovery
Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Rounded
Fee Increase
($)
Fee Increase
(%)
Fee in Year One
Not Rounded
Fee in Year One
Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Not Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Not Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Rounded
158 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy
159 First Month (0-30 days) $ 596.72 66% 899.31 $ 80% 719.45 $ $ 719 $ 122.73 21% $ 637.63 $ 638 $ 678.54 $ 679 $ 719.45 $ 719 160 Second Month (31 - 60 days) $ 1,494.02 268% 557.98 $ 80% 446.38 $ $ 446 $ (1,047.64) -70% $ 1,144.81 $ 1,145 $ 795.59 $ 796 $ 446.38 $ 446 161 Third Month (61 - 90 days) $ 2,989.17 536% 557.98 $ 80% 446.38 $ $ 446 $ (2,542.79) -85% $ 2,141.57 $ 2,142 $ 1,293.98 $ 1,294 $ 446.38 $ 446 162 Day 91 - Red tag and remove utilities - Post "DO NOT OCCUPY" (NOTE) $ - 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 163 New City Ordinance AB 2598
164 1st Violation $ 130.00 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (130.00) -100% $ 86.67 $ 87 $ 43.33 $ 43 $ - $ - 165 2nd Violation of Same Ordinance within 1 Year $ 700.00 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (700.00) -100% $ 466.67 $ 467 $ 233.33 $ 233 $ - $ - 166 Each Additional Violations of Same Ordinance within 1 Year $ 1,300.00 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (1,300.00) -100% $ 866.67 $ 867 $ 433.33 $ 433 $ - $ - Three-Year Phased User Fee Increase Schedule
80% Base Per $1,000
Up to $2,000 $ 712.91 -
$2,001 - $25,000 $ 712.91 $ 36.67
$25,001 - $50,000 $ 1,556.31 $ 7.92
$50,001 - $100,000 $ 1,754.31 $ 24.78
$100,001 - $500,000 $ 2,993.38 $ 20.40
$500,001 - $1,000,000 $ 11,153.04 $ 3.80
$1,000,001 and up $ 13,051.62 $ 1.90
Valuation Based Permits

Page 1174 of 1570 ends

PAGE 41
Planning and Development Services Department – Planning Division No. Service Name
Current
Fee
Current
Recovery Level
Full
Cost
Target
Recovery
Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Rounded
Fee Increase
($)
Fee Increase
(%)
Fee in Year One
Not Rounded
Fee in Year One
Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Not Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Not Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Rounded
1 Zoning applications
2 Temporary Use Permit $ 867 61% 1,416 $ 80% 1,133.20 $ $ 1,133 $ 265.88 31% $ 955.95 $ 956 $ 1,044.57 $ 1,045 $ 1,133.20 $ 1,133 3 Temporary Use Permit - Special Events $ 94 20% $ 480 60% 287.80 $ $ 288 $ 193.94 207% $ 158.51 $ 159 $ 223.15 $ 223 $ 287.80 $ 288 4 Annexations $ 229 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (229.02) -100% $ 152.68 $ 153 $ 76.34 $ 76 $ - $ - 5 Appeal to Commission/Board/Council plus noticing fee $ 803 10% 8,150 $ 40% 3,259.83 $ $ 3,260 $ 2,456.34 306% $ 1,622.27 $ 1,622 $ 2,441.05 $ 2,441 $ 3,259.83 $ 3,260 6 Certificate of Appropriateness - Public Hearing $ 3,521 59% 5,974 $ 59% 3,524.88 $ $ 3,525 $ 4.31 0% $ 3,522.01 $ 3,522 $ 3,523.44 $ 3,523 $ 3,524.88 $ 3,525 7 Certificate of Appropriateness - Staff level $ 824 23% 3,520 $ 40% 1,407.86 $ $ 1,408 $ 584.35 71% $ 1,018.29 $ 1,018 $ 1,213.07 $ 1,213 $ 1,407.86 $ 1,408 8 Certificate of Compliance $ 3,226 63% 5,143 $ 70% 3,600.17 $ $ 3,600 $ 373.70 12% $ 3,351.04 $ 3,351 $ 3,475.60 $ 3,476 $ 3,600.17 $ 3,600 9 Certificate of Conformity $ 2,746 61% 4,481 $ 70% 3,136.55 $ $ 3,137 $ 390.68 14% $ 2,876.10 $ 2,876 $ 3,006.32 $ 3,006 $ 3,136.55 $ 3,137 10 Development Agreement $ 229 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (229.02) -100% $ 152.68 $ 153 $ 76.34 $ 76 $ - $ - 11 General Plan Amendment $ 8,234 45% 18,098 $ 60% 10,858.88 $ $ 10,859 $ 2,625.00 32% $ 9,108.88 $ 9,109 $ 9,983.88 $ 9,984 $ 10,858.88 $ 10,859 12 General Plan Amendment <5 acres or <.5 FAR $ 4,115 49% 8,423 $ 70% 5,896.40 $ $ 5,896 $ 1,781.34 43% $ 4,708.84 $ 4,709 $ 5,302.62 $ 5,303 $ 5,896.40 $ 5,896 13 Exception $ 2,275 41% 5,510 $ 50% 2,754.99 $ $ 2,755 $ 479.68 21% $ 2,435.20 $ 2,435 $ 2,595.10 $ 2,595 $ 2,754.99 $ 2,755 14 Minor Use Permit $ 1,780 30% 5,979 $ 40% 2,391.44 $ $ 2,391 $ 611.75 34% $ 1,983.61 $ 1,984 $ 2,187.52 $ 2,188 $ 2,391.44 $ 2,391 15 Accessory Dwelling Unit $ 792 44% 1,806 $ 50% 903.21 $ $ 903 $ 110.99 14% $ 829.22 $ 829 $ 866.21 $ 866 $ 903.21 $ 903 16 Planned Development: Hourly Rate: $5,000 deposit, up to maximum fee of $27,840 (120 hours) $ 5,000 84% 5,961 $ 461% 27,480.21 $ $ 27,480 $ 22,480.21 450% $ 12,493.40 $ 12,493 $ 19,986.81 $ 19,987 $ 27,480.21 $ 27,480 17 Planned Development - (Amendment) $ 3,000 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (3,000.00) -100% $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000 $ - $ - 18 Design Review DRB - Major $ 7,382 54% 13,745 $ 60% 8,246.87 $ $ 8,247 $ 865.28 12% $ 7,670.02 $ 7,670 $ 7,958.44 $ 7,958 $ 8,246.87 $ 8,247 19 Preliminary Review $ 229 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (229.02) -100% $ 152.68 $ 153 $ 76.34 $ 76 $ - $ - 20 Public Convenience or Necessity $ 2,030 59% 3,453 $ 100% 3,452.73 $ $ 3,453 $ 1,422.72 70% $ 2,504.25 $ 2,504 $ 2,978.49 $ 2,978 $ 3,452.73 $ 3,453 21 Public Notice Mailing (200 & 300 feet) $ 384 32% 1,197 $ 45% 538.64 $ $ 539 $ 154.42 40% $ 435.69 $ 436 $ 487.16 $ 487 $ 538.64 $ 539 22 Public Notice Mailing (500 & 1,000 feet) $ 681 45% 1,521 $ 75% 1,140.85 $ $ 1,141 $ 460.01 68% $ 834.18 $ 834 $ 987.51 $ 988 $ 1,140.85 $ 1,141 23 Rezoning/Map Prezoning, Text Amendment: Hourly Rate: $5,000 deposit, up to maximum fee of $18,320 (80 hours) $ 5,000 29% 17,524 $ 105% 18,320.00 $ $ 18,320 $ 13,320.00 266% $ 9,440.00 $ 9,440 $ 13,880.00 $ 13,880 $ 18,320.00 $ 18,320 24 Sign Permits - Over-the-Counter $ 166 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (166.45) -100% $ 110.97 $ 111 $ 55.48 $ 55 $ - $ - 25 Sign Permits - All Others $ 428 49% $ 878 75% 658.65 $ $ 659 $ 230.61 54% $ 504.91 $ 505 $ 581.78 $ 582 $ 658.65 $ 659 26 Sign Master Plan/Program $ 2,174 58% 3,716 $ 75% 2,787.15 $ $ 2,787 $ 613.23 28% $ 2,378.33 $ 2,378 $ 2,582.74 $ 2,583 $ 2,787.15 $ 2,787 27 Development Review - Major (Staff Level) $ 5,513 67% 8,215 $ 67% 5,504.26 $ $ 5,504 $ (8.76) 0% $ 5,510.10 $ 5,510 $ 5,507.18 $ 5,507 $ 5,504.26 $ 5,504 28 Development Review - Major (PC Public Hearing) - Flat Fee, No deposit $ 3,000 32% 9,515 $ 70% 6,660.31 $ $ 6,660 $ 3,660.31 122% $ 4,220.10 $ 4,220 $ 5,440.21 $ 5,440 $ 6,660.31 $ 6,660 29 Development Review - SB 35 and/or Density Bonus $ 4,628 75% 6,152 $ 90% 5,536.41 $ $ 5,536 $ 908.21 20% $ 4,930.94 $ 4,931 $ 5,233.68 $ 5,234 $ 5,536.41 $ 5,536 30 Development Review - Minor $ 824 20% 4,111 $ 30% 1,233.17 $ $ 1,233 $ 409.66 50% $ 960.06 $ 960 $ 1,096.62 $ 1,097 $ 1,233.17 $ 1,233 31 Special Requests $ 229 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (229.02) -100% $ 152.68 $ 153 $ 76.34 $ 76 $ - $ - 32 Specific Plan - New/Amendment: Hourly Rate: $5,000 deposit, up to maximum fee of $27,195 (80 hours) $ 229 0% $ - 100% 27,480.00 $ $ 27,480 $ 27,250.98 11899% $ 9,312.68 $ 9,313 $ 18,396.34 $ 18,396 $ 27,480.00 $ 27,480 33 Major Use Permit $ 5,455 55% 9,894 $ 65% 6,431.40 $ $ 6,431 $ 975.94 18% $ 5,780.77 $ 5,781 $ 6,106.09 $ 6,106 $ 6,431.40 $ 6,431 34 Major Use Permit - Amendment - (25% of original fee) $ - 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ - 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 35 Variance $ 8,170 65% 12,629 $ 70% 8,840.36 $ $ 8,840 $ 670.31 8% $ 8,393.49 $ 8,393 $ 8,616.93 $ 8,617 $ 8,840.36 $ 8,840 36 Zoning Verification Letter $ 427 35% 1,225 $ 55% 673.75 $ $ 674 $ 246.71 58% $ 509.28 $ 509 $ 591.52 $ 592 $ 673.75 $ 674 37 Environmental Quality
38 Environmental lmpact Report - (Contract Plus 20%) $ - 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (1.00) 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 39 Mitigated Negative Declaration/Addendum, City Staff Prepared $ 10,065 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (1.00) -100% $ 6,709.93 $ 6,710 $ 3,354.96 $ 3,355 $ - $ - City of Vallejo
Planning and Development Services - Planning Division
FY25
Three-Year Phased User Fee Increase Schedule

Page 1175 of 1570 ends

PAGE 42
No. Service Name
Current
Fee
Current
Recovery Level
Full
Cost
Target
Recovery
Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Fee at Target
Recovery Level
Rounded
Fee Increase
($)
Fee Increase
(%)
Fee in Year One
Not Rounded
Fee in Year One
Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Not Rounded
Fee in Year Two
Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Not Rounded
Fee in Year
Three
Rounded
40 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Consultant Prepared - (Contract plus 20%) $ - $ - - 100% $ - $ - $ (1.00) 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 41 Subdivision Applications
42 Lot Line Adjustment $ 2,504 56% 4,487 $ 80% 3,589.76 $ $ 3,590 $ 3,588.96 43% $ 2,866.14 $ 2,866 $ 3,227.95 $ 3,228 $ 3,589.76 $ 3,590 43 Parcel Map $ 3,342 55% 6,048 $ 80% 4,838.39 $ $ 4,838 $ 4,837.59 45% $ 3,840.54 $ 3,841 $ 4,339.46 $ 4,339 $ 4,838.39 $ 4,838 44 Parcel Map Amendment $ 2,339 66% 3,535 $ 80% 2,827.77 $ $ 2,828 $ 2,826.97 21% $ 2,502.01 $ 2,502 $ 2,664.89 $ 2,665 $ 2,827.77 $ 2,828 45 Tentative Map 5-20 lots $ 11,275 54% 21,048 $ 75% 15,785.89 $ $ 15,786 $ 15,785.14 40% $ 12,778.70 $ 12,779 $ 14,282.30 $ 14,282 $ 15,785.89 $ 15,786 46 Tentative Map 20 + lots $ 12,628 43% 29,136 $ 60% 17,481.43 $ $ 17,481 $ 17,480.83 38% $ 14,245.83 $ 14,246 $ 15,863.63 $ 15,864 $ 17,481.43 $ 17,481 47 Tentative Map Amendment (25% of Original Fee) $ - 0% $ - 100% $ - $ - $ (1.00) 0% $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 48 Zoning Compliance Review-Minor (Over the Counter Plan Check) $ 66 50% $ 133 100% 132.85 $ $ 133 $ 131.85 100% $ 88.51 $ 89 $ 110.68 $ 111 $ 132.85 $ 133 49 Zoning Compliance Review - Major (Not Over the Counter/Plan Check) $ 269 28% $ 955 45% 429.96 $ $ 430 $ 429.51 60% $ 322.71 $ 323 $ 376.33 $ 376 $ 429.96 $ 430 50 Code Enforcement Review: Non-Compliance Penalty/Fine $ 538 52% 1,037 $ 52% 539.19 $ $ 539 $ 538.67 0% $ 538.51 $ 539 $ 538.85 $ 539 $ 539.19 $ 539 51 Mills Act - Application $ 258 5% 4,889 $ 30% 1,466.68 $ $ 1,467 $ 1,466.38 469% $ 660.78 $ 661 $ 1,063.73 $ 1,064 $ 1,466.68 $ 1,467 52 Mills Act - Contract Preparation $ 1,034 21% 4,889 $ 30% 1,466.68 $ $ 1,467 $ 1,466.38 42% $ 1,178.07 $ 1,178 $ 1,322.38 $ 1,322 $ 1,466.68 $ 1,467 53 Mills Act - Contract Monitoring $ 1,034 165% $ 626 100% 625.73 $ $ 626 $ 624.73 -39% $ 897.76 $ 898 $ 761.74 $ 762 $ 625.73 $ 626 54 Notice of Exemption $ 258 46% $ 558 50% 279.16 $ $ 279 $ 278.66 8% $ 264.94 $ 265 $ 272.05 $ 272 $ 279.16 $ 279 55 Certificate of Appropriateness - Over-the-Counter $ 258 36% $ 718 50% 359.05 $ $ 359 $ 358.55 39% $ 291.57 $ 292 $ 325.31 $ 325 $ 359.05 $ 359 56 Abandoned Shopping Cart Prevention Plan $ 3,114 134% 2,325 $ 100% 2,325.00 $ $ 2,325 $ 2,324.00 -25% $ 2,850.89 $ 2,851 $ 2,587.95 $ 2,588 $ 2,325.00 $ 2,325 57 Modification of Shopping Cart Prevention Plan $ 492 134% $ 368 100% 368.00 $ $ 368 $ 367.00 -25% $ 450.57 $ 451 $ 409.28 $ 409 $ 368.00 $ 368 58 Design Review - Minor $ - 0% 4,243 $ 30% 1,273.02 $ $ 1,273 $ 1,272.72 0% $ 424.34 $ 424 $ 848.68 $ 849 $ 1,273.02 $ 1,273 59 SB-9 - Lot Split $ - 0% 3,881 $ 60% 2,328.40 $ $ 2,328 $ 2,327.80 0% $ 776.13 $ 776 $ 1,552.27 $ 1,552 $ 2,328.40 $ 2,328 60 SB-9 - Two Unit Development $ - 0% 3,881 $ 60% 2,328.40 $ $ 2,328 $ 2,327.80 0% $ 776.13 $ 776 $ 1,552.27 $ 1,552 $ 2,328.40 $ 2,328 61 SB-9 Lot Split and Two Unit Development $ - 0% 5,897 $ 70% 4,128.03 $ $ 4,128 $ 4,127.33 0% $ 1,376.01 $ 1,376 $ 2,752.02 $ 2,752 $ 4,128.03 $ 4,128 62 Street Vender - Permit $ - 0% $ 347 50% 173.41 $ $ 173 $ 172.91 0% $ 57.80 $ 58 $ 115.60 $ 116 $ 173.41 $ 173 FY25
City of Vallejo
Three-Year Phased User Fee Increase Schedule
Planning and Development Services - Planning Division

Page 1176 of 1570 ends

ACTION ITEM 9.E.

DATE: September 9, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Veronica A.F. Nebb, City Attorney
SUBJECT: RECEIVE PRESENTATION OF SCOPES FOR FOUR PRIORITY CITY COUNCIL

REFERRALS RELATED TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF

RECOMMENDATION
Receive the scopes of work that City staff developed for four City Council referrals related to public safety and provide direction to staff on next steps.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
City staff were requested to return to Council with four public safety items scoped, and to receive feedback regarding the implementation of certain Council referrals.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
City Council referrals are requests for future Council agenda items or special projects that the City Council directs City staff to research and possibly implement, in addition to staff’s routine work and projects required by other City work planning processes, such as the strategic plan and the budget processes.

On July 22, 2025, City Council implemented a new referral process consisting of:
• A Referral Submission Form for Councilmembers to complete at the time the referral is made, or shortly thereafter.
• A new subheading titled "Requests & Actions for Future Agenda Items" was added to the City Council meeting agenda, giving Councilmembers a consistent time to make referral requests. • A Two-Step Approval Process:
o Step 1: Council Initiation & Prioritization — When a referral is made, Council votes on:
▪ Whether the referral should move forward.
▪ The item's priority.
▪ A timeline for staff to return with a project scope.
▪ This requires a majority vote of Council.
o Step 2: Review of Scope & Final Approval
▪ At the Council-directed timeline, staff will return with the detailed scope of work, including estimated timeframes, staffing requirements and fiscal impacts. ▪ Council will then vote to either approve or reject moving forward with the implementation of the item.
▪ This requires a majority vote.

At the City Council meeting on September 10, 2024, City staff presented information on the 31 referrals that Council recently requested. The 31 included two referrals that had been completed; seven that had been approved for implementation and were awaiting completion; four that were awaiting scoping from staff; and eighteen that were pending a Council decision on whether to direct staff to scope. At the September 10, 2024 meeting, City Council added a new referral, bifurcated one referral, eliminated three referrals, and provided

Page 1177 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: RECEIVE PRESENTATION OF SCOPES FOR FOUR PRIORITY CITY COUNCIL

REFERRALS RELATED TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF

Page 2 ends

updated direction to staff on the referrals. At that meeting, Council also directed staff to present, at a Council meeting in October 2024, scopes that the City Council had previously requested for four referrals. At the September 10, 2024 Council meeting, Council directed staff to create scopes for sixteen referrals that had been pending a Council decision on whether to direct staff to scope. Council directed staff to present scopes for these sixteen referrals at a Council meeting in November 2024. Staff presented scopes for these sixteen referrals at the Council meeting on November 19, 2024. The staff report for the Council meeting is attached as Attachment 1. At that meeting, City Council did not take any action on the referrals and rather directed staff to return to City Council in February 2025 to get direction from the new City Council. In September 2024, December 2024, and January 2025, City Council added thirteen more referrals.

At the July 22, 2025 City Council meeting, staff were directed (1) to bring forward scopes for 4 specific public safety related items; and (2) to work on scoping the remaining items on the referral list. Returning to Council tonight is the scoping of the four specific public safety-related items:

Table: Referrals for Which City Council Requested Scopes Topic Date Requested Requestor
Analysis and possible presentation of an ordinance addressing prostitution/solicitation
December 10, 2024 Palmares
Analysis and possible presentation of a Red Light Abatement Act ordinance
June 24, 2025 Palmares
Analysis and possible presentation of a process and related action for a reduction of speeds pursuant to AB-22 for (1) in school site zones from 25mph to 15mph; and (2) in designated business districts July 8, 2025 Matias
Analysis and possible action to adopt an Individual Gun Violence Restraining Order (IGVRO) Policy
July 8, 2025 Matias
Attached hereto are scopes and recommendations relating to the four public safety related items requested on July 22nd. City staff seek Council’s direction on whether or not to proceed to take action to develop any of the four items, and a process and timeline for same. Staff is completing scopes for all remaining Council referrals and intends to present those to Council at a soon future Council meeting unless directed otherwise by Council.

Those include the special projects for which scopes were presented on November 19, 2024 as well as the special projects requested in September 2024, December 2024, and January 2025 (consolidating those that are duplicative).

FISCAL IMPACT
Some of the required resources to implement the four referrals, such as staff time, are already part of the FY 2025-2026 adopted budget. For some referrals, if approved for implementation, additional resources may be needed to be allocated by the City Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Prostitution Ordinance Referral Scope 8.2025 Final

2. Red Light Abatement Referral Scope 8-2025 Final

3. Gun Violence Restraining Orders Referral Scope 8-25 Final

Page 1178 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: RECEIVE PRESENTATION OF SCOPES FOR FOUR PRIORITY CITY COUNCIL

REFERRALS RELATED TO PUBLIC SAFETY AND PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF

Page 3 ends

4. Vallejo PD Policy 347 GVRO

5. Speed Limit Reductions (AB43) Referral Scope 8.2025 Final

6. AB43

CONTACT
Veronica A.F. Nebb, City Attorney
[email protected]

Page 1179 of 1570 ends

DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Veronica Nebb, City Attorney
Hampton Jackson, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: CREATION OF A PROSTITUTION ORDINANCE –SCOPE OF WORK

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Item number 34 of the City Council Referral requests was submitted by Councilmember Palmares. The request is to research, possibly draft and possible consideration of an ordinance addressing prostitution. City Attorney Staff has briefly looked at the viability of such an ordinance in order to provide sufficient detail for the scope below to be considered by the City Council. As a result of this initial research, staff are also providing below a recommendation based upon the viability and anticipated effectiveness of such an ordinance based upon this initial research.

LEGAL LANDSCAPE AND LEGISLATIVE HISTORY RELATING TO CURRENT

PROSTUTION LAWS
In 2019, California passed SB 233. The law, which aimed to improve the health and safety of individuals in the sex trade, prohibited police and prosecutors from using condoms as evidence of prostitution. The law further allowed sex workers to report a crime committed against them, without being arrested or prosecuted for related sex work or for a misdemeanor drug offense.

In 2022, California passed SB 357, the Safer Streets for All Act. The new law prohibited police from arresting individuals in violation of Penal Code section 653.22, loitering in a public place with the intent to commit prostitution. Further, SB 357 allowed individuals who had been convicted under PC § 653.22 to remove this conviction from their criminal record.

While SB 357 did not decriminalize prostitution and other sex work-related offenses, the bill prevented police from targeting and arresting individuals for loitering with intent to commit prostitution. In practice, this law prevents police officers from arresting an individual until they have attempted or committed the actual crime.

On July 30, 2025, Governor Newsom signed AB 379 into law. AB 379 creates a new offense for loitering with the intent to purchase commercial sex, increases penalties for purchasing commercial sex from minors, and requires certain businesses to display information related to human trafficking. Loitering in a public place with the intent to purchase commercial sex is now a misdemeanor offense pursuant to state law. Also, if the buyer of commercial sex is more than

Page 1180 of 1570 ends

three years older than a minor victim, the buyer will be charged with a felony. Finally, the law increases fines for businesses that facilitate prostitution and human trafficking.

California law preempts the City from adopting an ordinance which would prosecute loitering with intent to commit prostitution. While AB 379 prohibits loitering with intent to purchase commercial sex, loitering with intent to commit prostitution remains legal. Thus, any City ordinance addressing prostitution would be limited to enforcement against the buyers. Because California law provides sufficient tools to enforce against the buyers, a City ordinance which would do the same is effectively unnecessary.

SCOPE ASSOCIATED WITH A VALLEJO SPECIFIC ORDINANCE
Vallejo Police Department – Hours and Resources
AB 379 provides an important tool in addressing sex trafficking by strengthening accountability for individuals who exploit vulnerable members of Vallejo. From a policing standpoint, this legislation provides VPD with an opportunity to enhance both its enforcement posture and preventative efforts.

Sex trafficking is not only a crime, but a profound community harm that requires a coordinated and proactive response. To meet this challenge, VPD intends to utilize a new Problem Orientated Policing (POP) Team as a central element in enforcing AB 379. This team will be tasked with identifying trafficking activity, conducting targeted operations, and working closely with community partners to ensure victims are connected to support services. Their proactive approach, rather than relying solely on reactive casework, will allow VPD to intervene earlier and more effectively.

The POP Team will initially consist of 4 full-time officers (1 sergeant and 3 officers), and VPD expects the team to be fully staffed by October 2025. In addition to any prostitution or red-light abatement enforcement, the POP Team will also assist with sideshows, armed robberies, shootings, and various quality of life crimes. Finally, the POP Team anticipates that the initial enforcement for prostitution would be roughly two to three days per month.

City Attorney’s Office – Hours and Resources
While as set forth in more detail below, staff does not recommend the drafting of a prostitution ordinance at this time, if the City Council so desires, a limited ordinance could be developed.

The City Attorney’s Office anticipates that the research, drafting, and presentation of a proposed ordinance would require approximately 30 hours of staff time. One assistant city attorney would be assigned to research and draft the ordinance, and the City Attorney and the Chief Assistant City Attorney would be involved in the review and presentation of the ordinance. The above

Page 1181 of 1570 ends

time estimate does not include any additional time or costs associated with public outreach either before or after the consideration and adoption of any local ordinance.

Public Works – Hours and Resources
Pursuant to VMC Chapter 8, the City Engineer would be required to conduct traffic reports. The Public Works Streets Team would also be tasked with the creation and installation of traffic signs. The City anticipates a financial expense associated with the production of traffic reports.

Also, the City anticipates that implementation of the proposed traffic measures would require approximately 30 hours of staff time.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council not move forward with a proposed prostitution ordinance because California’s current statutory scheme is sufficient. Current California law preempts effective investigation and prosecution of individuals loitering with the intent to commit prostitution. Further, recently adopted changes to California law (AB 379) allows for the prosecution of individuals soliciting sex from minors or loitering with the intent to purchase sex with fines in excess of those that the City can impose. Taken as a whole, state legislation prohibits the solicitation of sex; however, SB 357 the Safer Streets for All Act prohibits police for arresting individuals for loitering for prostitution. Thus, any proposed City ordinance will be severely restricted in addressing loitering for prostitution.

POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE CITY ACTIONS
Traffic Enforcement
Chapter 8 of the Vallejo Municipal Code authorizes the City’s Traffic Engineer to limit the standing or parking of vehicles at specified places and/or for specified times. Further, it is within the City’s Engineer’s discretion to determine no-parking zones and prohibited parking zones for on-street parking in the City. Once a traffic report is completed, the City Engineer can designate no-parking zones and post tow-away signs to address problematic areas. The Public Works Department in conjunction with the Police Department could possibly examine areas of the City to be considered for revised parking or standing regulations which could have the effect of deterring buyers from pulling to the curb, parking or standing in areas plagued by prostitution activity. The cost of a traffic report is unknown at this time. Staff would have to obtain a bid for such report.

The Police Department Traffic Division has limited resources at this time. Additional detail on the cost and timeline for enhancing the traffic division is included in the separate report relating to speed limit reductions.

Page 1182 of 1570 ends

Community Outreach
Several nonprofits in the Bay Area run programs to address exit pathways for sex workers and survivors of human trafficking. These programs include street outreach teams who contact and offer services to sex workers. Some of these programs also offer temporary shelter, counseling, assistance with transportation to return home to family or friends and educational programs. The Police Department currently works with one non-profit that operates in this space. A possible alternative city action would be to explore expanding that work to include a more robust program with one or more non-profits already operating in this space. The enhanced program could be a part of the VISIONS program and provide additional funding for specific activities targeted to victim services and exit pathways. The cost and timeline for implementation of such a program is unknown at this time, but could be explored further if the Council believes this is a viable alternative.

Report a John Program
The Vallejo Report John Program (RJP) was created to reduce human trafficking and prostitution in high impacted areas by targeting sex buyer activity. RJP enables the community to report sex buying activity through a website. A citizen can provide vehicle and suspect information which is then evaluated by VPD. If deemed appropriate, a “Letter of Visibility” is sent to the registered owner of a suspected vehicle alerting them that their vehicle was seen in an area known for high levels of prostitution. The program has been adopted and remains live in Vallejo, to date the program has not reached full implementation. Currently, the Police Department has a contract with a non-profit to assist in implementation of the program however, to date the program has not reached full implementation. In order to reach full implementation additional non-sworn staff support would be required.

Engagement of the Public Safety Subcommittee in Vetting Other Ideas There may be other alternative ideas that could assist in reducing prostitution related activities that could be explored. One avenue for such exploration, would be to engage the newly formed City Council Public Safety Subcommittee in receiving and vetting any additional ideas and then bringing forward any recommendations to the full council for consideration. Examining actions taken by other jurisdictions, both successful and non-successful, consideration of ideas brough forward by the community or those organizations working in this area could be work that the subcommittee could engage with staff on without initially impacting full city council meetings.

Page 1183 of 1570 ends

DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Veronica Nebb, City Attorney
Hampton Jackson, Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: POSSIBLE CREATION OF A RED LIGHT ABATEMENT ORDINANCE –

SCOPE OF WORK

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Item number 54 of the City Council referral requests was submitted by Councilmember Palmares. The request is to research and possibly draft an ordinance addressing red-light abatement. City Attorney Staff has briefly looked at the viability of such an ordinance, in order to provide the below scope. As a result of this initial research, staff are also providing a recommendation based upon the viability and anticipated effectiveness of such an ordinance.

LEGAL LANDSCAPE AND RELEVANT CALIFORNIA STATUTUES
California Government Code § 38771, et seq.

California Government Code section 38771, et seq., authorizes the legislative body of a city to declare by ordinance a public nuisance and to establish procedures for the abatement of such nuisances, including the recovery of costs associated with nuisance abatement proceedings. A public nuisance generally is defined as conditions that are harmful to public health, safety, or welfare.

The Vallejo Municipal Code has adopted numerous ordinances related to public nuisances.

Generally, a violation of a specific ordinance or a determination made by a public official that nuisance activity has occurred constitutes a public nuisance pursuant to the Vallejo Municipal Code.

Drug Abatement Act (Health & Safety Code §§ 11570–11587) The California Drug Abatement Act allows cities to remove occupants from any building or place where any illegal drug activity occurs. Every building or place used for the purpose of drug activity is expressly declared a nuisance, subject to injunctive relief. The Drug Abatement Act also allows cities to seek a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction ordering the building to be vacated and boarded against entry for up to one year. In addition to providing for injunctive relief, a city may also recover fines and costs, attorney’s fees and investigation costs which if not paid can be filed as a lien against the real property and ultimately enforced through the sale of the property.

Page 1184 of 1570 ends

The Drug Abatement Act is a particularly useful tool because an order to vacate the property can be obtained quickly. When a building or house is the situs of ongoing drug activity, it can be difficult to arrest and prosecute each individual. Further, the continuous criminal activity on the property can become a strain on policing resources. An injunction pursuant to the Drug Abatement Act provides a city with expansive relief without having to spend the time and money on numerous individual criminal prosecutions. However, to obtain an injunction, there must be careful documentation of the pattern of drug activity, and declarations from police officers who have personal knowledge of the illegal activities on the subject property and qualify as experts in drug identification, drug trafficking, and drug use. Additional declarations, including declarations from neighbors, are also useful. In some cases, prior to issuing an injunction, the court may require that a city attempt less drastic approaches to abate the drug nuisance, such as sending notification letters, holding meetings, and having discussions with the property owner or business owner.

Red Light Abatement Act (Pen. Code §§ 11225-11235)
The Red Light Abatement Act allows any city, through its city attorney, to vacate and board up for 1 year any building or place used for gambling, prostitution, lewd behavior (spas, massage parlors, bathhouses), or any other criminal sexual behavior that could lead to transmission of AIDS. The Act also covers places used for illegal gambling. The same penalties, cost recovery and foreclosure rules apply as with the Drug Abatement Act. Further, as required under the Drug Abatement Act, careful documentation and police declarations are necessary to obtain an injunction.

Both the Drug and Red Light Abatement Acts can be utilized by a city without the need for passing a local city ordinance.

City of Salinas Red-Light Abatement Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2675) In January 2024, the City of Salinas adopted an ordinance incorporating the California Red Light Abatement Act to mitigate the effects of prostitution activities within the city. While any city is free to incorporate state law into their municipal code, cities can enforce both the Drug Abatement Act and the Red Light Abatement Act without passing any local ordinance.

SCOPE ASSOCIATED WITH A VALLEJO SPECIFIC ORDINANCE
Vallejo Police Department
Currently, the Vallejo Police Department does not have the requisite number of officers to staff a vice unit to assist with the civil prosecution of drug or red-light abatement. However, VPD intends to utilize a new Problem Orientated Policing (POP) Team as a central element in enforcing AB 379. This team will be tasked with identifying trafficking activity, conducting

Page 1185 of 1570 ends

targeted operations, and working closely with community partners to ensure victims are connected to support services. Their proactive approach, rather than relying solely on reactive casework, will allow VPD to intervene earlier and more effectively.

City Attorney’s Office
While staff does not recommend the drafting of a red-light abatement ordinance at this time (see more detailed discussion below), if the City Council wishes to consider a local ordinance similar to the City of Salinas, the City Attorney’s Office anticipates that the research, drafting, and presentation of a proposed ordinance would require approximately 50 hours of staff time. One assistant city attorney would be assigned to research and draft the ordinance, and the City Attorney and the Chief Assistant City Attorney would be involved in the review and presentation of the ordinance. This estimate does not include any hours associated with community outreach either before or after the adoption of any ordinance.

The City Attorney’s Office Neighborhood Law Program (NLP) regularly files public nuisance abatement actions. Utilizing the penalties under the Drug and Red Light Abatement Acts, the NLP has successfully abated properties with illegal gambling activity and illegal marijuana grows. However, the NLP is severely limited in its civil prosecution of nuisance properties (illegal gambling, marijuana grows, and massage parlors), because successful prosecution requires extensive police evidence and documentation. Until VPD can fully staff a vice or assign such activities to a fully staffed POP unit, the civil prosecution of nuisance properties would remain limited.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council not move forward with a proposed specific local red light abatement ordinance because California’s current statutory scheme is sufficient. The penalties instituted by the Drug Abatement Act and Red Light Abatement Act are effective and severe. Further, the City can enforce these laws without the need to adopt an ordinance. Once there are sufficient resources to file such cases, the Police Department and the City Attorney’s office can re-institute such actions. If the Council would like to schedule a regular check in report such can be added to the regular staffing updates.

Page 1186 of 1570 ends

Page 1187 of 1570 ends

DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Veronica Nebb, City Attorney
Randy J. Risner, Chief Assistant City Attorney
SUBJECT: CREATION OF A GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER POLICY –

SCOPE OF WORK

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Item number 57 of the City Council Referral requests was submitted by Councilmember Matias.

The request is to research, possibly draft and to possibly consider a policy concerning Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVRO). City Attorney Staff has briefly looked at the viability of such a policy in order to provide sufficient detail for the scope below to be considered by the City Council. As a result of this initial research, staff are also providing below a recommendation based upon the viability and anticipated effectiveness of such a policy based upon this initial research.

CURRENT GVRO POLICY
The City currently has an existing GVRO policy that is part of the Vallejo Police Department Policy Manual. It is Policy No. 347, a copy of which is attached hereto for reference. The policy was put into place in response to California Penal Code Section 18108 which required every police department in California to adopt a GVRO policy on or before January 1, 2021. The policy accomplishes the following requirements of Section 18108:

1. Instructs officers on the use of GVROs in appropriate situations to prevent future violence involving firearms;

2. Instructs officers on the types of evidence a court considers in determining whether grounds exist for issuance of a GVRO;

3. Instructs officers to consider whether a GVRO may be necessary during a response to any residence that is associated with a firearm registration or record, during a response in which a firearm is present, or during a response in which one of the involved parties owns or possesses a firearm, or expressed an intent to acquire a firearm;

4. Instructs officers to consider whether a GVRO may be necessary during a contact with a person exhibiting mental health issues, including suicidal thoughts, statements, or actions, if that person owns or possesses a firearm or expressed an intent to acquire a firearm. The policy

Page 1188 of 1570 ends

reflects the policy of the agency to prevent access to firearms by people with mental health issues who pose a danger to themselves or to others by owning or possessing a firearm.

Unfortunately, because of ongoing staffing issues, VPD does not frequently use the GVRO process. In order to ramp up use, it would require additional resources that don’t currently exist.

SCOPE ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASING USE OF OR ENHANCING THE

EXISTING GVRO POLICY
Vallejo Police Department – Hours and Resources
GVROs are a tool to prevent individuals who possess firearms, and who may be high risk from using those firearms to inflict harm. While VPD has an existing policy, it is currently not in frequent use because of the manpower needed to implement a robust program. According to Chief Ta, most of the gun violence in Vallejo is committed by individuals who cannot legally possess guns for other reasons. Frequently guns used in gun violence are either stolen or “ghost” guns which are not registered or traceable. GVROs would be ineffective against such uses because they are already prohibited by law and are a crime. However, GVROs can be effective in domestic violence cases and cases in which guns are in the possession of high risk individuals who meet the criteria for a GVRO.

In order to determine if a robust GVRO program would have a positive effect in the community, VPD would need to conduct significant statistical research. The research would require a significant amount of hours. If the City Council desires to move forward, the Chief will provide a time estimate for conducting the necessary research.

If a GVRO program is implemented, the Police Department believes it will require additional man hours for VPD staff including the use of tactical teams to serve GVROs on subjects.

Tactical teams are needed for such service because officers will know that the subject possesses firearms.

In addition, officers will need to be trained to gather the evidence that will be required by the court in order to consider the issuance of a GVRO. Depending upon the workload, this could require the creation of a GVRO unit. Such a unit was developed in the City of San Diego as a joint effort of the San Diego Police Department and the City Attorney’s office. The unit has been described as successful in reducing the number of guns on the street, particularly those that may have been identified as in possession of individuals in high risk categories that have not yet resulted in any criminal action.

In Vallejo, since the GVRO policy already exists, the question would be whether to move toward creation of a dedicated program for using the policy and implementing it. That would be a

Page 1189 of 1570 ends

collaborative effort between VPD and CAO. Such a program may not be immediately viable on a widespread basis until additional personnel resources are available.

City Attorney’s Office – Hours and Resources
In addition, to additional police resources, additional city attorney resources would also be necessary. Each of the GVROs would require an attorney to create and file the request for the GVRO with the court. It would then require evaluation of evidence supplied by VPD, preparation for court hearing and testimony by VPD officers at such hearings. Again, depending upon the ultimate workload which we cannot currently estimate, it may require one or more dedicated attorneys to handle the actual work. We estimate that each GVRO would require 10-12 hours of work for an attorney. If there were two each week, current CAO staff could probably absorb that work at current staffing levels. However, if there were five per week, we would likely need additional staff.

RECOMMENDATION
The City currently has a GVRO policy in place. Implementing a robust program under that policy would require a significant commitment of VPD resources to conduct a statistical study to determine if such a program would be worthwhile in Vallejo. If Council determined to move forward with a robust program, it would also potentially require a dedicated unit within VPD to investigate GVROs in order to obtain adequate evidence. It would also require the use of tactical teams to serve GVRO paperwork because of the presence of firearms in a potentially volatile situation.

In addition, a robust GVRO program would require a significant commitment of City Attorney resources and perhaps a dedicated attorney, depending on how frequently GVROs are used. This attorney would be responsible for evaluating evidence provided by VPD and preparing cases for hearing which would include prepping VPD officers for testimony, evaluating opposing evidence and preparing arguments for court.

If the Council desires to move forward with enhancing the use of the City’s existing policy by developing a robust program, such work can be undertaken. VPD however is not likely to be able to implement such a program in the immediate future because of staffing shortfalls. (note:
other jurisdictions, such as San Jose and San Diego, have robust programs but also have dedicated staff for the program). The options before the Council would be to consider: (1) proceeding to develop a program at this time recognizing the implementation challenges; (2) as VPD continues to report on increased staffing levels, determine the point at which such a program should be developed and move forward at that time; or (3) take no action pending direction in the future.

Page 1190 of 1570 ends

Policy
347
Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual
Gun Violence Restraining Orders
347.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for petitioning and serving gun violence restraining orders and accounting for the firearms obtained pursuant to those orders (Penal Code § 18108).
347.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include:

Gun violence restraining order - Civil restraining order prohibiting a named person from controlling, owning, purchasing, possessing, receiving, or otherwise having custody of any firearms or ammunition, including an ammunition magazine (Penal Code § 18100). 347.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Vallejo Police Department to petition for and serve gun violence restraining orders in compliance with state law and to properly account for firearms and ammunition obtained by the Department pursuant to such orders.
347.3 GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDERS
An officer who reasonably believes a person is a present danger to self or another person by controlling, owning, purchasing, possessing, receiving, or otherwise having custody of a firearm may request permission from the officer's supervisor to petition the court for a gun violence restraining order.

Officers petitioning the court should use the forms established by the Judicial Council (Penal Code § 18105). The petition should describe the number, types, and locations of any firearms and ammunition that the officer believes to be possessed or controlled by the person (Penal Code § 18107). The petition should also describe why less-restrictive alternatives are ineffective or inadequate for the circumstances (Penal Code § 18125; Penal Code § 18150; Penal Code § 18175).

If it is not practical under the circumstances to submit a written petition, an officer may submit the petition electronically or orally request a temporary order (Penal Code § 18122; Penal Code § 18140).
347.3.1 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Officers should also consider requesting permission to petition the court for a gun violence restraining order (Penal Code § 18108):
(a) When responding to a residence that is associated with a firearm registration or record. (b) When responding to any call or incident when a firearm is present or when one of the involved parties owns, possesses, or expresses an intent to acquire a firearm. (c) During a contact with a person exhibiting mental health issues, including suicidal thoughts, statements, or actions, if that person owns or possesses a firearm.

Published with permission by Vallejo Police Department
Gun Violence Restraining Orders - 297

Page 1191 of 1570 ends

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual
Gun Violence Restraining Orders
Officers should consider obtaining a mental health evaluation if the encounter involves a situation where there is a reasonable cause to believe that the person poses an immediate and present danger of causing personal injury to themself or another person by having custody or control of a firearm or expresses intent to obtain a firearm (see the Mental Illness Commitments Policy) (Penal Code § 18108).
347.4 SERVICE OF GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDERS
An officer serving any gun violence restraining order shall:
(a) Verbally ask the subject of the order if he/she has any firearm, ammunition, or magazine in his/her possession or under his/her custody or control (Penal Code § 18160).
(b) Request that any firearms or ammunition be immediately surrendered and issue a receipt for the surrendered items (Penal Code § 18120). (c) Take into temporary custody any firearm or other deadly weapon discovered in plain view or pursuant to consent or other lawful search (Penal Code § 18250). (d) Inform the restrained person of any scheduled hearing regarding the order (Penal Code § 18160).
(e) Transmit the original proof of service form to the issuing court as soon as practicable but within one business day (Penal Code § 18115).
(f) As soon as practicable, but by the end of his/her shift, submit proof of service to the Records Supervisor for prompt entry into the California Restraining and Protective Order System (Penal Code § 18115).

The officer should also inform the restrained person that he/she is required, within 24 hours, to surrender to a law enforcement agency any other firearms and ammunition he/she owns or that are in his/her custody or control or sell them to a firearms dealer. This notification should be documented.

All firearms and ammunition collected shall be handled and booked in accordance with the Property and Evidence Policy.
347.4.1 TEMPORARY EMERGENCY GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDERS An officer requesting a temporary emergency gun violence restraining order shall (Penal Code § 18140):
(a) For oral requests, sign a declaration under penalty of perjury reciting the oral statements provided to the judicial officer and memorialize the order of the court on the form approved by the Judicial Council.
(b) Serve the order on the restrained person if the person can be reasonably located. (c) Forward a copy of the order to the Records Supervisor for filing with the court and appropriate databases.

Published with permission by Vallejo Police Department
Gun Violence Restraining Orders - 298

Page 1192 of 1570 ends

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual
Gun Violence Restraining Orders
347.5 SEARCH WARRANTS
If a person who has been served with a gun violence restraining order refuses to surrender any firearm or ammunition, the officer should consider whether to seek a search warrant. If a search warrant is to be obtained, the preparation and service of the search warrant shall be done in accordance with the Warrant Service Policy. Additionally, (Penal Code § 1542.5):
(a) The officer serving the warrant shall take custody of any firearm or ammunition that is controlled, possessed or owned by the person who is the subject of the gun violence restraining order, including any discovered pursuant to the warrant, a consensual search or other lawful search.
(b) If the location being searched is jointly occupied and the firearm or ammunition is owned by a person other than the restrained person, the firearm or ammunition should not be seized if the following conditions are met:

1. The firearm or ammunition can be stored in a manner that does not allow the restrained person to have control or access.

2. There is no evidence that the owner unlawfully possesses the firearm or ammunition.
(c) If a locked gun safe belonging to someone other than the subject of a gun violence restraining order is discovered, the officer shall not search the contents of the safe unless the owner consents or there is a valid search warrant for the safe. Any search of the safe must be done in the owner’s presence.
347.6 RECORDS SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES
The Records Supervisor is responsible for ensuring:
(a) Proof of service of any gun violence restraining order served by an officer or received from the clerk of the court is entered in the computer database system for protective and restraining orders maintained by the Department of Justice within one business day of service if served by an officer, or within one business day of receipt of proof of service if served by a person other than a law enforcement officer (Penal Code § 18115).
(b) Temporary orders are entered into the California Restraining and Protective Order System (Penal Code § 18140).
(c) Copies of temporary orders are filed with the court as soon as practicable, but no later than three court days, after issuance (Penal Code § 18140). (d) Copies of receipts of surrendered firearms or ammunition issued by other agencies for gun violence restraining orders issued by the Department are properly maintained (Penal Code § 18120).
(e) Any relinquishment of firearm rights form received from the court is entered into the California Restraining and Protective Order System within one business day of receipt (Penal Code § 18115).

Published with permission by Vallejo Police Department
Gun Violence Restraining Orders - 299

Page 1193 of 1570 ends

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual
Gun Violence Restraining Orders
347.7 COURT-ORDERED FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION SURRENDERS
Authorized members shall accept firearms and ammunition from any individual who is the subject of a gun violence restraining order. The member receiving any firearm or ammunition shall:
(a) Record the individual’s name, address and telephone number. (b) Record the serial number of the firearm.
(c) Prepare an incident report and property report.
(d) Provide a property receipt to the individual who surrendered the firearms and ammunition.
(e) Package and submit the firearms and ammunition in accordance with the Property and Evidence Policy.
347.8 STORAGE AND RELEASE OF FIREARMS AND AMMUNITION
Firearms and ammunition that were taken into temporary custody or surrendered pursuant to a gun violence restraining order shall be stored in accordance with the Property and Evidence Policy.

Firearms and ammunition shall be returned to the restrained person upon the expiration of the order in accordance with Penal Code § 18120 and the Property and Evidence Policy (Penal Code § 18108).
347.9 GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police will appoint a gun violence restraining order coordinator. The responsibilities of the coordinator include:
(a) Developing and maintaining procedures for the filing of a petition for an order or a renewal of an order by department members, also including procedures for requesting and serving (Penal Code § 18108):

1. A temporary emergency gun violence restraining order.

2. An ex parte gun violence restraining order.

3. A gun violence restraining order issued after notice and hearing.

4. Renewal orders.
(b) Developing and maintaining factors to consider when assessing the need to seek an order, including (Penal Code § 18108; Penal Code § 18155):

1. Whether threats have been made, and if so, whether the threats are credible and specific.

2. Whether the potential victim is within close proximity.

3. Whether the person has expressed suicidal tendencies.

4. Whether the person has access to firearms.

5. The criminal history of the person, in particular any history of criminal violence, including whether the person is currently on parole, probation, or monitored release.

Published with permission by Vallejo Police Department
Gun Violence Restraining Orders - 300

Page 1194 of 1570 ends

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual
Gun Violence Restraining Orders

6. The mental health history of the person, in particular whether the person has any history of mental illness or has ever been detained for being a danger to themselves or others.

7. Any upcoming holidays, anniversaries, or other dates of significance that may serve as a trigger for the person, such as the death of a family member.

8. Whether the person has any history of drug or alcohol abuse. (c) Developing and maintaining procedures for the receipt and service of orders consistent with the requirements of Penal Code § 18115; Penal Code § 18120; Penal Code § 18135; Penal Code § 18140; and Penal Code § 18160. Procedures should include:

1. Evaluation of an order to determine appropriate service and necessary precautions (see the Warrant Service Policy and the Operations Planning and Deconfliction Policy).

2. Forwarding orders to the Records Supervisor for recording in appropriate databases and required notice to the court, as applicable.

3. Preparing or obtaining a search warrant prior to attempting service of an order, when appropriate (Penal Code § 18108).

4. Seizure procedures of firearms and ammunition at the time of issuance of a temporary emergency gun violence restraining order.

5. Verification procedures for the removal of firearms and ammunition from the subject of a gun violence restraining order (Penal Code § 18108). (d) Coordinating with the Training Sergeant to provide officers who may be involved in petitioning for or serving orders with training on such orders. Training should include determining when a petition is appropriate, the process for seeking an order, and the service of such orders.
(e) Reviewing each petition and any associated court documents for an order prepared by members, for compliance with this policy, department procedures, and state law. (f) Developing and maintaining procedures for members to accept voluntarily surrendered prohibited items at times other than when an order is being served by the Department.

1. Procedures should include preparing and providing a receipt identifying all prohibited items to the person surrendering the items.
(g) Coordinating review of notices of court hearings and providing notice to the appropriate officer of the hearing date and the responsibility to appear and participate in the evidence presentation process (Penal Code § 18108).
(h) Coordinating with the Training Sergeant to ensure officers remain current with the following (Penal Code § 18108):

1. Types of evidence a court considers when determining whether grounds exist for the issuance of a gun violence restraining order as provided in Penal Code § 18155 (Grounds for gun violence restraining order; examination by court).

Published with permission by Vallejo Police Department
Gun Violence Restraining Orders - 301

Page 1195 of 1570 ends

Vallejo Police Department
Vallejo PD Policy Manual
Gun Violence Restraining Orders

2. The different procedures and protections afforded by different types of firearmprohibiting emergency protective orders that are available to law enforcement petitioners.
(i) Establishing standards and procedures for addressing violations of a gun violence restraining order (Penal Code § 18108).
(j) Establishing procedures for officers to provide information about mental health referral services during contact with persons exhibiting mental health issues (Penal Code § 18108).
347.10 RENEWAL OF GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDERS
The Investigations Division supervisor is responsible for the review of a gun violence restraining order (including temporary or ex parte orders) obtained by the Department to determine if renewal should be requested within the time prescribed by law (Penal Code § 18190). 347.11 POLICY AVAILABILITY
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall be responsible for making this policy available to the public upon request (Penal Code § 18108).
347.12 TRAINING
The Training Sergeant should ensure that members receive periodic training on the requirements of this policy (Penal Code § 18108).

Published with permission by Vallejo Police Department
Gun Violence Restraining Orders - 302

Page 1196 of 1570 ends

DATE: September 2, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Veronica Nebb, City Attorney
Angad Gangapuram, Deputy City Attorney
SUBJECT: ASSEMBLY BILL 43—SPEED LIMIT REDUCTIONS: (1) IN DESIGNATED BUSINESS DISTRICTS; AND (2) IN DESIGNATED SCHOOL ZONES

RECOMMENDATION
Item number 56 of the City Council Referral request was submitted by Councilmember Matias.

This request was to consider implementing Assembly Bill 43 (“AB43”) to implement reduced speed limits (1) in designated business districts; and (2) in designated school zones. The City Attorney Staff has researched the costs associated with reducing speed limits across various City departments and presents the following scope of work.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Assembly Bill 43 is a legislative measure that was signed in October 2021, aimed at providing municipalities with additional flexibility in setting speed limits on California roadways. The primary purpose of AB43 is to increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety by allowing City’s to consider additional factors and the use a data-driven analysis when setting speed limits, particularly in business activity districts, senior zones, safety corridors, and school zones.

Speed limits have historically been determined by conducting an Engineering and Traffic Study (“E&TS”). Generally, E&TSs involve measuring vehicle speeds on specific roadways segments and then establishing speed limits at or within the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic for those segments. Per California Vehicle Code (“CVC”) § 22358.6, posted speed limits shall be established to the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic.

Speed limits set outside of the 85th percentile were considered “speed traps”, as defined by CVC § 40802 et. seq., if enforcement in those areas involves the use of radar or other electronic devices. Recent changes have allowed for more flexibility in the 85th percentile rule.

Conducting an E&TS is governed by both the CVC and the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (“MUTCD”). Since E&TS are used to set speed limits and are usually only valid for a period of five (5), seven (7), or fourteen (14) years, the City must update their E&TS prior to lowering speed limits as allowed by the CVC, due to the changes set forth by AB43. The City’s current E&TS is set to expire on May 31, 2026.

Page 1197 of 1570 ends

SCOPE OF WORK AND FISCAL IMPACT
The primary fiscal impacts in the implementation of AB43 would be spread across three City departments: the Vallejo Police Department, the City Attorney’s Office, and the Public Works Department. The estimated costs associated with each department’s specific responsibilities are set forth below.
i. Vallejo Police Department
The Vallejo Police Department (“VPD”) will be the primary department responsible for the enforcement and educational component of the changes in the reduction of speed limits. The primary component of implementing speed limit reductions is the educational component, which will likely include a series of community meetings and a social/digital media campaign. Most citizens operating on public throughfares are law abiding motorists, and as such, will comply with changes in law if duly notified.

If, upon the reduction in speed limits in certain areas, the City notices a lack of compliance, VPD would be the department tasked with enforcing the changes in law. Currently, the VPD Traffic Division is staffed by two (2) Full-time equivalent (“FTE”) employees, consisting of one (1) FTE Sergeant and one (1) FTE Officer. There are plans to expand the division with the addition of one (1) additional FTE Officer, but those plans have not yet been finalized by the Department.

The cost of adding an additional FTE Officer is approximately $268,706.71 annually. It is worth noting that despite adding additional Officers, the VPD Traffic Division is tasked with a high amount of other departmental responsibilities, including but not limited to event permits, tow rotation oversight, department wide collision investigation, state reporting requirements, fatal collision reviews and follow-ups, tow hearings, and abandoned vehicle abatement.

Consequently, the Traffic Division and VPD currently lack the necessary resources to dedicate full-time staff strictly dedicated to enforcing speed limits.

If VPD were to dedicate personnel strictly towards speed limit enforcement City wide, without interfering with the existing responsibilities of Traffic Division Staff, they estimate this would cost approximately $268,706.71 per year and involve the hiring and training of one additional FTE officer, which could take between 12-14 months to accomplish.

Alternatively, if VPD were to dedicate a certain amount of existing Traffic Divion Staff hours to enforcing speed limits in the areas undergoing reductions pursuant to AB43, they would be able to dedicate fifteen (15) hours per week to this purpose.

Page 1198 of 1570 ends

ii. City Attorney’s Office
The City Attorney’s Office role in the implementation of AB43 speed limit reductions would involve reviewing E&TS as well as drafting and presenting the proposed ordinance. This would require roughly thirty (30) hours of staff time. This workload would be split between four staff members. One Deputy City Attorney and one Assistant City Attorney, who would be responsible for researching and drafting the ordinance. Subsequently, the City Attorney and Chief Assistant City Attorney would be involved to review, finalize, and present the proposed ordinance.
iii. Public Works Department
The Public Works Department’s primary responsibilities will be to oversee the new E&TS, creation and the installation of new signage, and amending existing pavement markings currently used to indicate speed limits on roadways.

Due to staffing levels in the Public Works Department, the City will need to retain an outside Transportation Consultant to perform the E&TS. The Department received a quote for this project on August 18, 2025, in the amount of $166,265.00. This E&TS will cover 170 road segments within in the City and will take approximately ninety (90) days to complete from when it is started. The Public Works team will then have an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed speed limit changes considered in the new E&TS prior to finalizing it, which will take another thirty (30) to sixty (60) days.

New signage will also be necessary to alert motorists of the reduction in speed limits. Until an E&Ts is conducted, the actual number of signs that will need to be replaced is unknown. The Public Works Department estimates that a single sign will cost about $42.50 to create and approximately $51.96 to install. Additionally, there are several streets where pavement markings are used to indicate the speed limit. Those markings would need to be removed and revised in conjunction with the changes stated above. These projects would likely be handled internally by City staff.

A time estimate cannot be provided with accuracy until an E&TS is completed.

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council move forward with this proposal to reduce speed limits in certain high traffic areas to increase pedestrian, bicyclist, and motorist safety. It would however be prudent to conduct this change in conjunction with the expiration of the current E&TS, which will occur in roughly nine (9) months, on May 31, 2026.

Page 1199 of 1570 ends

CONTACT
Veronica Nebb, City Attorney; [email protected] Angad Gangapuram, Deputy City Attorney; [email protected]

Page 1200 of 1570 ends

Assembly Bill No. 43
CHAPTER 690
An act to amend Sections 627, 21400, 22352, 22354, 22358, and 40802 of, and to add Sections 22358.6, 22358.7, 22358.8, and 22358.9 to, the Vehicle Code, relating to traffic safety.
[Approved by Governor October 8, 2021. Filed with Secretary of State October 8, 2021.]
legislative counsel’s digest
AB 43, Friedman. Traffic safety.
(1) Existing law establishes various default speed limits for vehicles upon highways, as specified. Existing law authorizes state and local authorities to adjust these default speed limits, as specified, based upon certain findings determined by an engineering and traffic survey. Existing law defines an engineering and traffic survey and prescribes specified factors that must be included in the survey, including prevailing speeds and road conditions.

Existing law authorizes local authorities to consider additional factors, including pedestrian and bicyclist safety.

This bill would authorize local authorities to consider the safety of vulnerable pedestrian groups, as specified.
(2) Existing law establishes a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on any highway, other than a state highway, located in any business or residence district, as defined. Existing law authorizes a local authority to change the speed limit on any such highway, as prescribed, including erecting signs to give notice thereof.

This bill would establish a prima facie speed limit of 25 miles per hour on state highways located in any business or residence district and would authorize the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to change the speed limit on any such highway, as prescribed, including erecting signs to give notice thereof.
(3) Existing law establishes a speed limit of 65 miles per hour on state highways, as specified. Existing law authorizes Caltrans to declare a speed limit on any such highway, as prescribed, of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, or 25 miles per hour, including erecting signs to give notice thereof. Existing law also authorizes a local authority, on a section of highway, other than a state highway, where the speed limit is 65 miles per hour to declare a lower speed limit, as specified.

This bill would additionally authorize Caltrans and a local authority to declare a speed limit of 20 or 15 miles per hour, as specified, on these highways.
(4) Existing law authorizes a local authority, without an engineering and traffic survey, to declare a lowered speed limit on portions of highway, as

Page 1201 of 1570 ends

specified, approaching a school building or school grounds. Existing law limits this authority to sections of highway meeting specified requirements relating to the number of lanes and the speed limit of the highway before the school zone.

This bill would similarly authorize a lowered speed limit on a section of highway contiguous to a business activity district, as defined, and would require that certain violations be subject to a warning citation, for the first 30 days of implementation.
(5) Existing law requires Caltrans, by regulation, to provide for the rounding up or down to the nearest 5 miles per hour increment of the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing traffic on a portion of highway as determined by a traffic and engineering survey. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to create and implement an online tool by June 30, 2024, for the adjudication of traffic infractions, among other things.

This bill would authorize a local authority to further reduce the speed limit, as specified, and require that certain violations be subject to a warning citation, for the first 30 days of implementation. The bill would, in some circumstances, authorize the reduction of a speed limit beginning June 30, 2024, or when the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating traffic infraction violations, whichever is sooner. The bill would require Caltrans to accordingly revise the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, as specified.
(6) Existing law defines a speed trap and prohibits evidence of a driver’s speed obtained through a speed trap from being admissible in court in any prosecution against a driver for a speed-related offense. Existing law deems a road where the speed limit is not justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted within the previous 7 years to be a speed trap, unless the roadway has been evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, in which case the speed limit remains enforceable for a period of 10 years. Existing law exempts a school zone, as defined, from certain provisions relating to defining a speed trap.

This bill would extend the period that a speed limit justified by a traffic and engineering survey conducted more the 7 years ago remains valid, for purposes of speed enforcement, if evaluated by a registered engineer, as specified, to 14 years.

This bill would also exempt a senior zone and business activity district, as defined, from those provisions.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 627 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
627. (a) “Engineering and traffic survey,” as used in this code, means a survey of highway and traffic conditions in accordance with methods determined by the Department of Transportation for use by state and local authorities.
90 Ch. 690 — 2 —

Page 1202 of 1570 ends

(b)  An engineering and traffic survey shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by the department, consideration of all of the following:
(1)  Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements. (2)  Accident records.
(3)  Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.
(c)  When conducting an engineering and traffic survey, local authorities, in addition to the factors set forth in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive, of subdivision (b) may consider all of the following:
(1)  Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:
(A)  Upon one side of the highway, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.
(B)  Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of a quarter of a mile, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures. (C)  The portion of highway is longer than one-quarter of a mile but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph (A) or (B). (2)  Safety of bicyclists and pedestrians, with increased consideration for vulnerable pedestrian groups including children, seniors, persons with disabilities, users of personal assistive mobility devices, and the unhoused.

SEC. 2. Section 21400 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
21400. (a)  The Department of Transportation shall, after consultation with local agencies and public hearings, adopt rules and regulations prescribing uniform standards and specifications for all official traffic control devices placed pursuant to this code, including, but not limited to, stop signs, yield right-of-way signs, speed restriction signs, railroad warning approach signs, street name signs, lines and markings on the roadway, and stock crossing signs placed pursuant to Section 21364.
(b)  The Department of Transportation shall, after notice and public hearing, determine and publicize the specifications for uniform types of warning signs, lights, and devices to be placed upon a highway by a person engaged in performing work that interferes with or endangers the safe movement of traffic upon that highway.
(c)  Only those signs, lights, and devices as are provided for in this section shall be placed upon a highway to warn traffic of work that is being performed on the highway.
(d)   Control devices or markings installed upon traffic barriers on or after January 1, 1984, shall conform to the uniform standards and specifications required by this section.

SEC. 3. Section 22352 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
90 — 3 — Ch. 690

Page 1203 of 1570 ends

22352. The prima facie limits are as follows and shall be applicable unless changed as authorized in this code and, if so changed, only when signs have been erected giving notice thereof:
(a)  Fifteen miles per hour:
(1)  When traversing a railway grade crossing, if during the last 100 feet of the approach to the crossing the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the crossing and of any traffic on the railway for a distance of 400 feet in both directions along the railway. This subdivision does not apply in the case of any railway grade crossing where a human flagperson is on duty or a clearly visible electrical or mechanical railway crossing signal device is installed but does not then indicate the immediate approach of a railway train or car.
(2)  When traversing any intersection of highways if during the last 100 feet of the driver’s approach to the intersection the driver does not have a clear and unobstructed view of the intersection and of any traffic upon all of the highways entering the intersection for a distance of 100 feet along all those highways, except at an intersection protected by stop signs or yield right-of-way signs or controlled by official traffic control signals. (3)  On any alley.
(b)  Twenty-five miles per hour:
(1)  On any highway, in any business or residence district unless a different speed is determined by local authority or the Department of Transportation under procedures set forth in this code.
(2)  When approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof, contiguous to a highway and posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. The prima facie limit shall also apply when approaching or passing any school grounds which are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children and the highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign. For purposes of this subparagraph, standard “SCHOOL” warning signs may be placed at any distance up to 500 feet away from school grounds.
(3)  When passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, contiguous to a street other than a state highway and posted with a standard “SENIOR” warning sign. A local authority may erect a sign pursuant to this paragraph when the local agency makes a determination that the proposed signing should be implemented. A local authority may request grant funding from the Active Transportation Program pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 2380) of Division 3 of the Streets and Highways Code, or any other grant funding available to it, and use that grant funding to pay for the erection of those signs, or may utilize any other funds available to it to pay for the erection of those signs, including, but not limited to, donations from private sources.

SEC. 4. Section 22354 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
22354. (a) Whenever the Department of Transportation determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles 90 Ch. 690 — 4 —

Page 1204 of 1570 ends

per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of a state highway where the limit of 65 miles is applicable, the department may determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie speed limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the highway.
(b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

SEC. 5. Section 22358 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
22358. (a) Whenever a local authority determines upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the limit of 65 miles per hour is more than is reasonable or safe upon any portion of any street other than a state highway where the limit of 65 miles per hour is applicable, the local authority may by ordinance determine and declare a prima facie speed limit of 60, 55, 50, 45, 40, 35, 30, 25, 20, or 15 miles per hour, whichever is found most appropriate to facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and is reasonable and safe, which declared prima facie limit shall be effective when appropriate signs giving notice thereof are erected upon the street. (b) This section shall become operative on the date specified in subdivision (c) of Section 22366.

SEC. 6. Section 22358.6 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358.6. The Department of Transportation shall, in the next scheduled revision, revise and thereafter maintain the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices to require the Department of Transportation or a local authority to round speed limits to the nearest five miles per hour of the 85th percentile of the free-flowing traffic. However, in cases in which the speed limit needs to be rounded up to the nearest five miles per hour increment of the 85th-percentile speed, the Department of Transportation or a local authority may decide to instead round down the speed limit to the lower five miles per hour increment. A local authority may additionally lower the speed limit as provided in Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8.

SEC. 7. Section 22358.7 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358.7. (a)  If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a prima facie speed limit that has been reduced an additional five miles per hour for either of the following reasons:
(1)  The portion of highway has been designated as a safety corridor. A local authority shall not deem more than one-fifth of their streets as safety corridors.
(2)  The portion of highway is adjacent to any land or facility that generates high concentrations of bicyclists or pedestrians, especially those from vulnerable groups such as children, seniors, persons with disabilities, and the unhoused.
(b)  (1)  As used in this section, “safety corridor” shall be defined by the Department of Transportation in the next revision of the California Manual 90 — 5 — Ch. 690

Page 1205 of 1570 ends

on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. In making this determination, the department shall consider highways that have the highest number of serious injuries and fatalities based on collision data that may be derived from, but not limited to, the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System. (2) The Department of Transportation shall, in the next revision of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, determine what constitutes land or facilities that generate high concentrations of bicyclists and pedestrians, as used in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). In making this determination, the department shall consider density, road use type, and bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure present on a section of highway. (c) A local authority may not lower a speed limit as authorized by this section until June 30, 2024, or until the Judicial Council has developed an online tool for adjudicating infraction violations statewide as specified in Article 7 (commencing with Section 68645) of Chapter 2 of Title 8 of the Government Code, whichever is sooner.
(d) A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

SEC. 8. Section 22358.8 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358.8. (a)  If a local authority, after completing an engineering and traffic survey, finds that the speed limit is still more than is reasonable or safe, the local authority may, by ordinance, retain the current speed limit or restore the immediately prior speed limit if that speed limit was established with an engineering and traffic survey and if a registered engineer has evaluated the section of highway and determined that no additional general purpose lanes have been added to the roadway since completion of the traffic survey that established the prior speed limit.
(b)  This section does not authorize a speed limit to be reduced by any more than five miles per hour from the current speed limit nor below the immediately prior speed limit.
(c)  A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

SEC. 9. Section 22358.9 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:
22358.9. (a)  (1)  Notwithstanding any other law, a local authority may, by ordinance, determine and declare a 25 or 20 miles per hour prima facie speed limit on a highway contiguous to a business activity district when posted with a sign that indicates a speed limit of 25 or 20 miles per hour. (2)  The prima facie limits established under paragraph (1) apply only to highways that meet all of the following conditions:
(A)  A maximum of four traffic lanes.
(B)  A maximum posted 30 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 25 miles per hour speed limit.
(C)  A maximum posted 25 miles per hour prima facie speed limit immediately prior to and after the business activity district, if establishing a 20 miles per hour speed limit.
90 Ch. 690 — 6 —

Page 1206 of 1570 ends

(b)  As used in this section, a “business activity district” is that portion of a highway and the property contiguous thereto that includes central or neighborhood downtowns, urban villages, or zoning designations that prioritize commercial land uses at the downtown or neighborhood scale and meets at least three of the following requirements in paragraphs (1) to (4), inclusive:
(1)  No less than 50 percent of the contiguous property fronting the highway consists of retail or dining commercial uses, including outdoor dining, that open directly onto sidewalks adjacent to the highway. (2)  Parking, including parallel, diagonal, or perpendicular spaces located alongside the highway.
(3)  Traffic control signals or stop signs regulating traffic flow on the highway, located at intervals of no more than 600 feet. (4)  Marked crosswalks not controlled by a traffic control device. (c)  A local authority shall not declare a prima facie speed limit under this section on a portion of a highway where the local authority has already lowered the speed limit as permitted under Sections 22358.7 and 22358.8. (d)  A local authority shall issue only warning citations for violations of exceeding the speed limit by 10 miles per hour or less for the first 30 days that a lower speed limit is in effect as authorized by this section.

SEC. 10. Section 40802 of the Vehicle Code is amended to read:
40802. (a)  A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(1)  A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
(2)  A particular section of a highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not apply to a local street, road, school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.
(b)  (1)  For purposes of this section, a local street or road is one that is functionally classified as “local” on the “California Road System Maps,” that are approved by the Federal Highway Administration and maintained by the Department of Transportation. It may also be defined as a “local street or road” if it primarily provides access to abutting residential property and meets the following three conditions:
(A)  Roadway width of not more than 40 feet.
(B)  Not more than one-half of a mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official traffic control signals as defined in Section 445. (C)  Not more than one traffic lane in each direction.
(2)  For purposes of this section, “school zone” means that area approaching or passing a school building or the grounds thereof that is 90 — 7 — Ch. 690

Page 1207 of 1570 ends

contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign, while children are going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during the noon recess period. “School zone” also includes the area approaching or passing any school grounds that are not separated from the highway by a fence, gate, or other physical barrier while the grounds are in use by children if that highway is posted with a standard “SCHOOL” warning sign.
(3)  For purposes of this section, “senior zone” means that area approaching or passing a senior center building or other facility primarily used by senior citizens, or the grounds thereof that is contiguous to a highway and on which is posted a standard “SENIOR” warning sign, pursuant to Section 22352.
(4)  For purposes of this section, “business activity district” means a section of highway described in subdivision (b) of Section 22358.9 in which a standard 25 miles per hour or 20 miles per hour speed limit sign has been posted pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of that section. (c)  (1)  When all of the following criteria are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A)  When radar is used, the arresting officer has successfully completed a radar operator course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B)  When laser or any other electronic device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the arresting officer has successfully completed the training required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)  (i)  The prosecution proved that the arresting officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the arresting officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii)  The prosecution proved the speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D)  The radar, laser, or other electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or calibration facility. (2)  A “speed trap” is either of the following:
(A)  A particular section of a highway measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated, or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel the known distance.
90 Ch. 690 — 8 —

Page 1208 of 1570 ends

(B)  (i)  A particular section of a highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or by local ordinance under paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I)  Except as specified in subclause (II), seven years. (II)  If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation, and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume, 14 years.
(ii)  This subparagraph does not apply to a local street, road, or school zone, senior zone, or business activity district.

O
90 — 9 — Ch. 690

Page 1209 of 1570 ends

ACTION ITEM 9.F.

DATE: September 9, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jason Ta, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: CONSIDER MAKING A FINDING TO CONTINUE THE STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY

RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY STAFFING

RECOMMENDATION
Consider making a finding reaffirming that the conditions exist to continue the proclamation of a local emergency.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
State law requires that the Proclamation of Local Emergency be reaffirmed every 60 days. The 60th day since the last confirmation of the proclamation is Sept 20, 2025. City Council must reaffirm the proclamation for it to continue.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
On July 25, 2023, the City Council unanimously voted to approve a Proclamation of Local Emergency due to the critically low staffing levels at the City of Vallejo Police Department. Below is information on the current situation with Police Department staffing and whether the conditions that gave rise to the Proclamation of Local Emergency continue to exist.

When the City of Vallejo adopted a Proclamation of Local Emergency in July 2023, the Police Department staffing continued to decline. As of Aug 2023, the department had 76 sworn staff positions filled, with nine officers on disability, four officers out on injury, and one officer on FMLA, totaling 62 full-duty sworn officers. 32 full-duty officers and 5 full-duty sergeants were working patrol. This staffing level was determined to constitute a state of emergency. At that time, the Police Department collapsed some divisions, including the Traffic Division and the Detective Division, to assign more staff to patrol.

Current Staffing Levels
Total Sworn Staffing: 81
Total Disability/Injured: 3
Number of Officers Working Patrol: 46
Field Training Program: 2
Strategies Underway to Increase Staffing
In addition to its regular attraction and retention efforts, the Police Department is working to implement new strategies to further attract and retain officers. The Police Department has entered an agreement with Allstar recruiting to increase the department's visibility towards applicants. The Police Department has also proposed a recruitment, retention, and referral program, which the City Council approved Step 2 of 2 on July 22nd.

Steps Taken to Supplement Staffing

Page 1210 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: CONSIDER MAKING A FINDING TO CONTINUE THE STATE OF LOCAL

EMERGENCY RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY STAFFING

Page 2 ends

In January of 2024, the Vallejo Police Department began coordinated discussions with the Solano County Sheriff’s Office relating to several different staffing models under a contract service agreement. At that time SB1379 was being introduced by State Senator Dodd’s office to create an exemption for the retired annuitant program to assist the COV with its public safety crisis. In Sept of 2024, SB 1379 was approved by Governor Newsom. In December of 2024, the Sheriff provided the COV with a staffing projection proposal for contract services. Since then, the city council and the county board of supervisors has provided direction for the city and the county to further negotiations for contract services. All labor unions affected have been contacted to commence meet and confer obligations. This topic will be decided by the County Board of Supervisors Sept 9.

Since, July 2024, CHP has been providing additional traffic enforcement when their traffic officers have free patrol time. CHP officers have been conducting this additional presence and enforcement on Vallejo city roadways. Starting in February, the Governor has authorized CHP to provide the department with additional assistance to conduct multiple traffic enforcement campaigns addressing sideshow activity and reckless driving. These added campaigns continue to deter and disrupt reckless driving and hold the offenders accountable.

The City Manager has concluded a Request for Proposal (RFP) for uniformed unarmed security guards.

The city’s existing security company (AX9) was selected. The City Manager's office, the City Attorney's office, Public Works, and the police department have since finalized the security guard deployment strategies. The contract has been reviewed and approved by the security company, Public Works, and the City Attorney's Office. HR is currently in Meet and Confer with the labor union regarding the contract.

The police department is also in the process of revitalizing its community volunteer program. The department's volunteer program will be revitalized to increase community engagement, expand department capacity for non-enforcement duties, and strengthen trust between law enforcement and residents. This program is a cost-effective alternative to additional staffing, with estimated annual savings of hundreds of paid personnel hours. By reallocating non-enforcement tasks to qualified volunteers, the police department will preserve sworn officer time for priority calls, reduce administrative strain, and extend its public presence at community events.

A phased launch can begin in January 2026 and will ensure quality training, proper oversight, and sustainable growth.

Emergency Conditions Remain
As stated above, on July 23, 2023, the City Council adopted a proclamation declaring a state of local emergency pursuant to Government Code Section 8550 et. seq. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 8630(c) the City Council is required to review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the City Council terminates the local emergency. Council last reaffirmed the emergency at its July 22, 2025, meeting.

City staff believe that Police Department staffing remains in an emergency staffing condition as of September 2025. As such, staff believe that a state of emergency still exists and recommends that the City Council vote to reaffirm the existence of the state of local emergency.

FISCAL IMPACT

Page 1211 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: CONSIDER MAKING A FINDING TO CONTINUE THE STATE OF LOCAL

EMERGENCY RELATING TO PUBLIC SAFETY STAFFING

Page 3 ends

There is no immediate financial impact associated with this item. Any potential impact will be brought back to City Council with related costs.

ATTACHMENTS
None

CONTACT
Jason Ta, Chief of Police
(707) 648-4540
[email protected]

Page 1212 of 1570 ends

ACTION ITEM 9.G.

DATE: September 9, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Gillian Haen, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS, LLC

PRELIMINARY GOLF COURSE CONCEPT PLAN

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution accepting City Council direction on the preliminary Blue Rock Springs Golf Course Concept Plan

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
In 2022, the City sold a 75-acre portion of Blue Rock Springs Golf Course to a developer (Blue Rock Springs, LLC) in order to facilitate development of housing, neighborhood commercial uses, and the redesign of the golf course, including a new clubhouse and upgraded course. The parties thereafter entered into a Performance and Participation Agreement which enables the City and Blue Rock Springs, LLC to take the next step towards developing the project. Section 4(c) of that Agreement states that after the preliminary Golf Concept Plan alternatives and preliminary Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost and Scope have been submitted to the City by the developer, the City Council will approve or disapprove the preliminary Golf Concept Plan and Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost and Scope within 60 days. The preliminary Golf Concept Plan was submitted on July 16, 2025, and the City Council is due to provide feedback on its preferred alternative Golf Facilities Options or offer sufficient comments for an approvable redesign at tonight's meeting to meet the September 14, 2025 deadline.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Blue Rock Springs Golf Course is a City-owned municipal 18-hole golf course consisting of 225 acres located at 655 Columbus Parkway, in Vallejo. The Golf Course reported negative revenues of approximately -$4.6M from 2011-2017.

In late 2017, the City issued an RFQ to sell a 75-acre portion of the golf course to fund development of a new Clubhouse and improved golf course to increase revenues. The goals for the RFQ included the following: 1) Update public golf course to operate fiscally positive; 2) Fund new Clubhouse and upgraded facilities serving both the golf course and community; and 3) Preserve or improve aesthetics, quality, property values, and retain views of the surrounding neighborhoods. The winning respondent was Greg Norman, who partnered with Lewis Group and became Blue Rock Springs, LLC (Developer).

In 2020, negotiations on the potential development came to a halt when Syar filed an initiative petition to require a public election for the rezoning of any open space property and filed a legal claim against the City. After much negotiation, Syar agreed to withdraw its petition and legal claim, and the parties agreed to enter into agreements to provide certain notices and use restrictions applicable to a portion of the golf course property (the "Settlement Agreement").

The project was then reanalyzed, given the Settlement Agreement requirements, and negotiations began for the Purchase and Sale Agreement. Century Urban was hired to review the proposed deal points and to advise the City Council on the best path forward for the most City benefit and revenue generation.

Page 1213 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS,

LLC PRELIMINARY GOLF COURSE CONCEPT PLAN

Page 2 ends

On December 20, 2022, the City Council approved the Purchase and Sale Agreement (PSA) of the Blue Rock Springs Golf Course to the Developer (Attachment A). As part of the PSA, a Participation and Performance Agreement was required to outline the path of project development and city benefits.

Participation and Performance Agreement
On December 17, 2024, the City Council approved the Participation and Performance Agreement which sets forth the path for future development of the site (Attachment B). The main components of the agreement consist of: Payment Structure, Concept Golf Plan, Commercial Component of the project, Appraisal, CFD Special Tax, and the Project Performance Schedule. Currently, we are working on the Concept Golf Plan.

A few important milestones highlighted in the agreement are:
• Milestone #1 - $100,000 deposit to City for the Deposit and Reimbursement Agreement which was completed on April 17, 2025.
• Milestone #2 - Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost and Scope submission, which was completed on July 16, 2025. This milestone also includes a presentation before the City Council at tonight's September 9, 2025 City Council meeting. The City is required to select from each of the three preliminary conceptual plan options presented prior to September 14, 2025. During review staff has prioritized the following:
o New Clubhouse/event center proposed to be placed on the East Course. o Overall golf course restoration and driving range modifications proposed to accommodate the new and expanded clubhouse footprint on the East Course. o Golf programming on the West Course.
• Milestone #3 - Golf Concept Plan to be reviewed by September 14, 2025 • Milestone #4 - Project Entitlements target date of January 12, 2026 The Performance and Participation Agreement defines how proceeds from the sale of the property are shared with the City to ensure the maximum profit share. (See attachment B).

The City’s financial benefit has a $10.5M floor. In addition, the following considerations will be made:

1. $400,000 upfront consideration- paid at PSA approval (complete).

2. Upon entitlement approvals -entitled property will be appraised by both parties- if the value is more than $10.5M, then City gets an additional 25% of value above $10.5M (including $1.5M for golf course design/entitlements). (Assumes 18.5% return for BRS.)

3. Sale of Land to Housing Developer-Proceeds: The City will receive the greater of 8.1525% as a percentage of gross lot sales or $8.6M allocated by lot minimum.

4. Profit share of 50% of homebuilder profits at sale of home-25% to City; 25% to Lewis.

5. Transfer Fee-At subsequent land sale (1%) in perpetuity for every legal lot created to the City.

The City maintains full authority and flexibility as to how to direct funds generated through residential and mixed-use development for the golf course upgrades, or any other desired scope/approach as the City Council directs. The guidance, collaboration and feedback received from the City Council on the conceptual project

Page 1214 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS,

LLC PRELIMINARY GOLF COURSE CONCEPT PLAN

Page 3 ends

plans are subject to further refinement that will result in a conceptual design level plan that will later be packaged as a part of the overall project entitlements. The City shall continue to reserve its full rights and authority as the oversight body through this process and in turn shall maintain full discretionary authority on future project approvals for both the Golf facilities and future development project.

Public Outreach
The Developer has conducted extensive public outreach with stakeholder meetings during July through October 2024 to gather community input and insight on the potential project. From September 2024 through June 2025, there were various stakeholder meetings (with members of the public, GVRD, city staff and golf professionals) that included touring the site, reviewing the vision for the site, its sustainability, housing needs/demands, infrastructure requirements, including technology and security. The steakholder group discussed the three proposed layouts for the East Course including the clubhouse design options, parking, driving range, golf course redesign, and the redesign/scope overviews for the West Course. The group liked the idea of a larger capacity clubhouse with a commercial kitchen that could hold larger events and be used to provide additional revenues for the City in the long term. The group preferred the option with parking closest to the clubhouse with the ability to separate the banquet room into two rooms, and have access to the outdoors for other activities.

On August 16, 2025, a community meeting was held regarding the potential project. The community meeting was well attended by residents. Discussion centered around the number of homes proposed to be built, possible view blockage, walkability of the course, and compatibility of design.

Review of the Concept Golf Plans
Consistent with the Performance and Participation Agreement, the developer has submitted three preliminary concept plans for the clubhouse and for the golf course improvements for the City’s approval.

On July 16, 2025, in accordance with the above milestones, BRS submitted the Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost & Scope, which includes three Clubhouse Preliminary Scope options and three Golf Facilities Preliminary Scope West Course options; and
The City Council is to provide feedback and select one of each (clubhouse and golf improvements) of the three preliminary conceptual plan options contained within the Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost & Scope within 60 days of the date of submittal, or by September 14, 2025 Some feedback to be thinking about as you review the plans is:

Does the Developer have the City and community's collective priorities in order? Did the Developer properly understand, assess, and respond to the priorities the City may have for a new clubhouse?
Is the Developer accommodating parking and cart storage needs supporting the clubhouse and golf course? Are there additional facilities and / or programming the Developer should consider? Are the driving range enhancements of interest?
Are the “other than regular play” golf options such as practice facilities, or a 3-par course or a 9-hole course, currently not offered at Blue Rock, something the City desires?

Page 1215 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS,

LLC PRELIMINARY GOLF COURSE CONCEPT PLAN

Page 4 ends

All City departments reviewed the concept plans in order to flag any important issues that may arise from any of the concepts. Staff did not identify anything noteworthy that would prevent any one of the plans from moving forward.

Staff has the following feedback for City Council to consider:

Clubhouse Concept Plan #1 is the preferred plan with some additional adjustments for consideration:

1. Add a larger clubhouse building with added flex space that could grow into a 500-person capacity as the area develops, including a commercial kitchen and an additional outdoor gathering area/space.

2. Clubhouse views appear best in plan #1, as the building is not surrounded by parking.

3. Staff suggests that Council consider the design they prefer not based on budget, but based on longterm golf operations and programming at the site.

4. Funding for the upgrades would come from the sale of the residential land, the residential lots, and long term payback in transfer fees of each newly created lot (as the Performance and Participation Agreement requires, as described above). Any cost beyond project revenues would be the responsibility of the City to contribute.

West Course Concept Plan #3 is the preferred option:

1. This option allows for potential future revenues by re-imagining the west course as a 9-hole par 3 course and would preserve the golf course views from the existing homes, which is important to the community.

2. This reduced-size 9-hole par 3 course is more affordable, creates a pipeline of new golfers for the larger 18-hole course, and would appeal to families, new golfers, junior golfers and those that like a quick warm-up game. This would potentially enhance revenue and reduce turf management costs.

Choosing Clubhouse option #1 and West Course option #3 puts the costs at ~$16.3M, without any upgrades or redesign of concepts. The range of costs between all options is from ~$14.2M to ~$17.8M.

NEXT STEPS
Once the City Council gives direction on the concept plans, the developer will adjust the design and complete the following:
• Entitlements submission, including General Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, Tentative Map, Planned Development Permit, and other entitlements as necessary; and • CEQA analysis.

FISCAL IMPACT
Receiving direction from City Council on the preliminary plans does not pose any fiscal impacts at this time.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A full environmental review will be undertaken, at the expense of the developer, prior to the consideration of the first related entitlement proposal.

ATTACHMENTS

Page 1216 of 1570 ends

Date: September 9, 2025
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION PROVIDING DIRECTION ON THE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS,

LLC PRELIMINARY GOLF COURSE CONCEPT PLAN

Page 5 ends

1. Resolution re BRS Golf Concept Plan_CAO Stamp

2. Attachment A - Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions

3. Attachment B - Performance and Participation Agreement (Blue Rock Springs Golf Course Redevelopment)

4. Blue Rock Springs - Presentation 07.2025 UPDATE

CONTACT
Gillian Haen, Assistant City Manager (707) 648-4163
[email protected]

Page 1217 of 1570 ends

RESOLUTION NO. ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO PROVIDING

DIRECTION ON THE PRELIMINARY BLUE ROCK SPRINGS, LLC GOLF COURSE

CONCEPT PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME WHEREAS, on December 20, 2022, the City Council approved the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions (PSA) for 655 Columbus Parkway to Blue Rock Springs, LLC (the Developer), which proposes to develop 75 acres out of approximately 255 acres of the property with housing and commercial uses while retaining and redesigning the Golf Course; and
WHEREAS, six amendments were given to increase the negotiation timeline for the Participation and Performance Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developer has conducted extensive public outreach with stakeholder meetings held on July 30, 2024, September 5, 2024, October 3, 2024, and October 31, 2024 to gather community input and insight on the proposal; and
WHEREAS, the “Participation Agreement” identified in the Purchase Agreement includes the terms and conditions for payment of additional consideration to City for City’s sale of the Blue Rock Springs property to the Developer; and
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2024, the City Council approved the Performance and Participation Agreement enabling the parties to take the next step towards developing the new City Golf Course and new residential housing and commercial uses in Vallejo; and WHEREAS, the Performance and Participation Agreement includes a schedule and terms pursuant to which the Developer will proceed with filing the applications and submittals that will be necessary to secure issuance of the project entitlements for the proposed development and the renovated City Golf Course in a timely manner; and
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2025, in accordance with the above schedule, Developer submitted the Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost & Scope, which includes three Clubhouse Preliminary Scope options and three Golf Facilities Preliminary Scope West Course options; and WHEREAS, the City Council is to provide feedback and select one of each of the three preliminary conceptual plan options contained within the Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost & Scope within 60 days of the date of submittal, or by September 14, 2025; and WHEREAS, Developer presented the Golf Facilities Preliminary Cost & Scope to the City Council for approval at a regular council meeting on September 9, 2025.

Page 1218 of 1570 ends

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves Clubhouse Preliminary Scope Option ___ and Golf Facilities Preliminary Scope West Course Option ___ or, alternatively, disapproves of ______________________________ and directs the Golf Architect to revise same in accordance with the substantive comments and feedback provided by the City Council.

Adopted by the City Council of the City of Vallejo at a regular meeting held on September 9, 2025, with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________________________________________________________

ANDREA SORCE, MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________________________________________________________________ DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

Page 1219 of 1570 ends

Dec 21, 2022 12:13 PM, 1049529041
Contract and Routing Form
Date Originated:

Finance Department ∙ 555 Santa Clara Street ∙ Vallejo ∙ CA ∙ 94590 ∙ 707.648.4592 Department: City Manager's Office, Economic Development Division Staff Contact: Emi Theriault, [email protected] Contract Type: Other: Purchase and Sale Agreement and related Lease Agreement Vendor: Lewis Management Corp.

Contract Not to Exceed Amount: 0.00
Contract Start Date: Dec 20, 2022 End Date: Dec 20, 2026 Authority to Contract: City Council Date to Council: Dec 20, 2022 Other Comments:

Please contact City Clerk if related executed Resolutions of approval need to be included.

Attachments are uploaded for review here: https://bit.ly/vContracts Approved Pre-Requisition Form
I have uploaded additional files.Yes
DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1220 of 1570 ends

Contract and Routing Form
Signature Page
Department Initial Date Comment
Originating Department/Division
Risk Manager
Finance Department
City Attorney
City Manager
City Clerk
Return executed contract to: Emi Theriault
DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1221 of 1570 ends

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF VALLEJO,

A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
AND

BLUE ROCK SPRINGS, LLC,

A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
December 20, 2022
DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1222 of 1570 ends

Page 1 ends

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND

JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS
This Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions (“Agreement”) is made and entered by and between The City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Blue Rock Springs, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or its assignee (“BRS”) (each a “Party,” and collectively, “Parties”), dated for reference purposes as of December 20, 2022. City and BRS do mutually agree as follows:

RECITALS
This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts, which the Parties agree are true and accurate:

A. City is the record owner of that certain real property commonly known as 655 Columbus Parkway, Vallejo, California (“City Property”), which is currently improved with two (2) eighteen- (18-) hole golf courses, clubhouse and associated improvements that are currently managed by Touchstone Golf, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Touchstone”), pursuant to an agreement with City. The City Property is more fully described on Exhibit A to this Agreement, which is incorporated herein by this reference.

B. On or about August 8, 2017, City issued a Request for Qualifications (“RFQ”) for the “Revitalization of Two 18-Hole Golf Courses and 225 Acres at Blue Rock Springs Municipal Golf Course through a Public-Private Partnership, Management, Lease or Other Agreement.” The RFQ identified three goals for any revitalization project: (1) renovate and restore the municipal golf course in a manner that allows for it to operate as an affordable public course but independent of subsidies from City; (2) fund the development of a new or renovated multi-use clubhouse and associated facilities serving both the golf course and the local community; and (3) preserve or improve the existing aesthetics, quality, property values, environment and views of the surrounding neighborhoods.

C. BRS’s predecessor-in-interest, Greg Norman Golf Course Design Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“Norman”), responded to the RFQ with a proposal that included a sale of a portion of the City Property.

D. City subsequently entered into Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreement with Norman regarding the Subject Property, dated July 3, 2018 (“ERN”). Norman subsequently assigned the ERN to BRS.

E. The Parties intend that BRS will acquire a portion of the City Property on the terms established by this Agreement, and that after closing, BRS will submit all applications necessary for the redevelopment of the City Property (“BRS Applications”).

F. The ERN was amended on eight (8) occasions between December 26, 2018 and October 20, 2022, in response to communications that Syar Industries, Inc., a California corporation (“Syar”) made to the City, and which resulted in City’s receipt of a formal complaint letter on or about June 2, 2020 (“Syar Complaint”).

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1223 of 1570 ends

Page 2 ends

G. Following negotiations between the Parties and Syar concerning the Syar Complaint, the Parties entered into that certain Settlement and Release Agreement with Syar, which was approved by the City Council for City by Resolution 22-136 N.C. adopted July 12, 2022, a true and correct copy of which is appended to this Agreement as Exhibit B, and is incorporated herein by this reference (“Syar Agreement”). Relevant here, the Syar Agreement requires the City and BRS to undertake certain additional actions as set forth in the Syar Agreement, including without limitation recording a Collaborative Use Easement on certain portions of the City Property identified in the Syar Agreement as set forth in the Syar Agreement (“Collaborative Use Easement”). In addition, a land plan (“Land Plan”) was developed, and is appended to the Syar Agreement.

H. As of the date of this Agreement, the current 8th Amendment to the ERN expires December 29, 2022.

I. The Parties now intend to establish the terms on which the City will sell and BRS will purchase a portion of the City Property which consists of a portion of each of Solano County Assessor’s Parcel No. (“APN”) 0081-040-100, 0081-040-880, 0081-191-010, 0081-040-110, and 0181- 190-010, including: (1) all rights, easements and appurtenances belonging or appurtenant thereto; and (2) all existing improvements located thereon, as more fully described in Exhibit C-1 through C-3 to this Agreement and incorporated herein by this reference (“Subject Property”).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the receipt and adequacy of which is acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
The Recitals set forth in the introductory paragraphs of this Agreement constitute a material part of this Agreement, and are fully incorporated herein by this reference, as if set forth in their entirety.

1. Effective Date. The Parties acknowledge that City’s ability to enter into this Agreement is contingent upon the enactment of a resolution by the City Council approving this Agreement. Accordingly, as used herein, the term “Effective Date” shall mean the latter of the date on which and this Agreement (a) has been executed by both Parties, and (b) the resolution(s) adopted by the City Council approving and authorizing this Agreement, shall become final and effective.

2. Purchase and Sale. City agrees to sell and BRS agrees to purchase the Subject Property, including without limitation all rights, easements and appurtenances belonging or appurtenant thereto, on the terms and conditions stated in this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, the Subject Property does not include (a) personal property used in the operation of a golf course on the Subject Property, (b) intellectual property in connection with such operations, (c) rights to select an operator for the golf course on the balance of the City Property, or (d) water and water rights, including both riparian and appropriative rights, in connection with the operation of the golf course; or (e) other property rights in connection with the City’s conduct of golf-related activities on the Subject Property.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1224 of 1570 ends

Page 3 ends

3. Consideration to City.
a. Payment of Negotiation Fee. City previously received the Negotiation Fee from BRS in the total sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), as provided by the ERN.

The Negotiation Fee is non-refundable to BRS and has been used to cover the costs associated with the negotiation of the ERN.
b. City Cost Security Deposit. In addition to the Negotiation Fee, BRS posted the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), as provided by the ERN (“City Cost Security Deposit”) to fund payment of City Costs, as defined by the ERN. The City Cost Security Deposit is non-refundable to BRS and has been used to cover the costs of negotiation of this Agreement. c. Purchase Deposit. Within three (3) days after the Effective Date, BRS shall deliver into Escrow (as hereinafter defined) with the Escrow Holder a deposit in the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) in cashier’s check or by confirmed wire transfer of good and available funds (“Purchase Deposit”). The Purchase Deposit shall be placed in an interestbearing account, shall be refundable to Buyer (except for the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment and Appraisal Fees), and shall be applied to the Purchase Price at Closing. City requested that BRS fund the cost of an appraisal of other City property, i.e., 400 Mare Island Way, Vallejo, California (“400 Mare Island”), in connection with its request that the Subject Property be released from certain loan obligations for which the Subject Property was pledged as security (“Loan Obligations”). To the extent that BRS funds the cost of the appraisal for 400 Mare Island, BRS may deduct the cost of the 400 Mare Island appraisal from the amount of the Purchase Deposit deposited with Escrow Holder. The full amount of the Purchase Deposit (i.e., $150,000) shall nonetheless be credited toward the Purchase Price.
d. Independent Consideration. Immediately upon receipt of the Purchase Deposit, Escrow Holder shall release a “Nonrefundable Consideration Payment,” in the amount of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) to City without further instructions from City or BRS. The Nonrefundable Consideration Payment is paid to City in consideration for City granting BRS the right to purchase the Subject Property and to conduct due diligence as a contingency in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, in no event shall the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment be refundable; however, the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment shall be applicable to the Purchase Price at Closing. e. Purchase Price.
i. The Purchase Price for the Property is and shall be the fair market value of the Property in its as-is-where-is condition, as is determined by an MAI-certified appraiser with at least ten (10) years of experience appraising comparable unimproved real property in Solano County, California (“Qualified Appraiser”).
ii. The Qualified Appraiser shall be instructed to appraise the Property for uses then allowed under then applicable laws and entitlements (without taking into account any prospective future uses or prospective value attributable to prospective entitlements and development rights that may thereafter be issued by any governmental or quasi-governmental entity, and assigning no value to the existing golf course operations of the Property). The appraisal shall recognize this DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1225 of 1570 ends

Page 4 ends

purchase as a “bulk” land sale. Further, no value shall be attributed to any portion of the Property lying within the Columbus Parkway right of way including, easements for streets, sidewalks, curb, gutter and/or existing easements which prohibit or restrict the use of the Property excluding therefrom the Collaborative Use Agreement.
iii. BRS shall have no obligation to purchase the Subject Property unless and until an appraisal of the Subject Property establishes the Purchase Price, and the Purchase Price is approved by BRS and City, each in its sole and absolute discretion. Each Party shall approve or disapprove the Purchase Price, in writing, within three (3) business days after its receipt of the appraisal which establishes the Purchase Price.
iv. City shall appoint the Qualified Appraiser. All fees associated with obtaining the appraisal (“Appraisal Fees”) shall be funded by BRS, which shall be non-refundable to BRS and shall not be applicable to the Purchase Price at Closing (as opposed to the costs to appraise 400 Mare Island), which are the subject of Section 3(c) of this Agreement. v. After approval of the Purchase Price by each of the Parties, and prior to the Closing Date, BRS shall deposit the balance of the Purchase Price in Escrow as provided by Section 10(b)(i), together with all other funds necessary on the part of BRS to enable Escrow Agent to comply with these instructions (see Sections 12 and 13) (“Closing Funds”).

4. Escrow. The Parties have opened escrow with First American Title Company, Northern California Homebuilder Services, c/o Tammi Buna, Senior Escrow Officer, 4750 Willow Road, Suite 275, Pleasanton, CA 94588, Escrow No. 0131-622619ala (“Escrow Agent”).

5. Limited Pre-Closing Investigation of the Property. During the period starting on the Effective Date and continuing through the Closing Date, BRS shall have the right to conduct limited physical inspections of the Subject Property and receive certain limited disclosures from City, as provided below.
a. Environmental Investigation. BRS previously obtained a Phase I environmental site assessment for the Subject Property (“Environmental Report”). BRS shall have a right to enter onto the Subject Property with reasonable advance notice to City, for purposes of obtaining an update to the Environmental Report and conducting such follow-up investigation as may be reasonable and necessary for BRS to evaluate the Subject Property’s environmental condition in manner sufficient to satisfy the “All Appropriate Inquiries” rule established by the Environmental Protection Agency. See 40 CFR Part 312, et seq.
b. Natural Hazard Disclosure. City may be required under California law to disclose if the Property lies within the following natural hazard areas or zones: (i) a special flood hazard area designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (California Civil Code Section 1102.17); (ii) an area of potential flooding (California Government Code Section 8589.4); (iii) a very high fire hazard severity zone (California Government Code Section 51183.5); (iv) a wild land area that may contain substantial forest fire risks and hazards (Public Resources Code Section 4136); (v) an earthquake fault zone (Public Resources Code Section 2621.9); or (vi) a seismic hazard zone (Public Resources Code Section 2694). On or about November 3, 2022, BRS obtained a Natural Hazards Disclosure Statement concerning the Property issued by JCP-LGS, which Natural DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1226 of 1570 ends

Page 5 ends

Hazards Disclosure Statement shall and hereby does satisfy City’s compliance with the above-stated obligations. BRS hereby acknowledges receipt the Natural Hazards Disclosure Statement. c. Title and Survey.
i. Preliminary Title Report. Prior to the Effective Date, BRS requested that First American Title Insurance Company (“Title Company”) issue a preliminary title report pertaining to the Subject Property, together with complete and legible copies of all documents relating to the title exceptions and other matters referred to in such preliminary title report (collectively, the “Preliminary Title Report”). The Preliminary Title Report shall provide for issuance of an owner’s policy of title insurance to BRS using an ALTA Policy Form 2021 or on such other form as BRS may require in its sole and absolute discretion, in the full amount of the Purchase Price, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions (defined below) (“Owner’s Title Policy”).

A. Within two (2) business days after the Effective Date, BRS shall notify City in writing (“Title Objection Notice”) of any title exceptions identified in the Preliminary Title Report and/or Survey that BRS disapproves in its sole and absolute discretion (“Title Objection”).

B. BRS hereby disapproves all deeds of trust, delinquent payments of taxes and assessments and other monetary liens affecting the Subject Property that accrued prior to Closing (other than liens for non-delinquent property taxes and assessments as described above) (“Monetary Exceptions”). City hereby covenants to cause all such Monetary Exceptions to be satisfied at City’s sole cost and expense (including all prepayment penalties and charges) before or concurrently with the Close of Escrow from sales proceeds or otherwise.

Notwithstanding the above, City and BRS acknowledge that the Subject Property is pledged as security for Loan Obligations to Union Bank of California, N.A., a national banking association organized an existing under the laws of the United States of American, as trustee (for convenience, “Union Bank”).

City shall exercise its best efforts to cause the release of the Subject Property from the Loan Obligations prior to Closing. In the event that City is unable to do so, the Loan Obligations shall become the subject of Section 6 of this Agreement, and its failure to secure the release the Loan Obligations shall not be deemed a pre-closing default within the meaning of Section 16.

C. Any exception to coverage shown on the Preliminary Title Report, or matter that is not listed as a Title Objection in the BRS’ Title Objection Notice will be deemed approved by BRS and shall constitute a “Permitted Exception” hereunder.

D. City shall have a period of two (2) business days following its receipt of the Title Objection Notice within which to notify BRS in writing (“Title Objection Response”) of its agreement to remove, alter, modify or otherwise mitigate any Title Objection to the satisfaction of BRS. City’s failure to timely provide a Title Objection Response will be deemed an election by City not to cure the Title Objections prior to the Close of Escrow. In the event that City is not willing to remove, alter, modify or otherwise mitigate any Title Objection to the satisfaction of BRS, BRS shall elect within two (2) business days after the City’s Title Objection Response was due to (1) waive its disapproval of such exception, in which case such exception shall then be deemed to be a Permitted Exception, or (2) terminate its obligation to purchase the Subject Property.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1227 of 1570 ends

Page 6 ends

ii. Survey. BRS shall obtain a boundary survey for the Subject Property (“Survey”) prepared by as surveyor and/or engineer selected by BRS in its sole discretion, provided that BRS shall pay for the cost of such Survey and provide City and the Title Company with copies of such Survey. The surveyor and/engineer shall prepare a metes and bounds legal description that will identify the Real Subject Property for purposes of the Title Policy, Grant Deed, and Rescission Deed (all as defined herein). The Survey and legal description shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager and the City Attorney, and such approval shall be and hereby is a condition of Closing. d. Golf Lease. Prior to Closing, City and BRS shall negotiate and execute a lease agreement (“Golf Lease”), which shall commence at the Close of Escrow, pursuant to which City shall continue to hold possession of the Subject Property and operate the golf course and attendant facilities thereon. The Golf Lease shall include commercially reasonable insurance and indemnity requirements for similar leases, in favor of BRS.

In the event that (i) each of the Parties does not approve the Purchase Price, or (ii) BRS terminates the Agreement prior to the Closing Date due to a condition identified in the Environmental Report or Natural Hazards Disclosure Statement; due to a title or survey defect; or due to the failure of the Parties to timely enter into the Golf Lease; the Purchase Deposit shall be refunded to BRS, less the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment, Appraisal Fees, and any amounts due to Escrow Agent from BRS pursuant to this Agreement. City shall promptly (but no longer than two (2) business days after such termination) execute any instructions required by Escrow Agent in order to release the Purchase Deposit. Upon BRS’ termination or deemed termination of this Agreement under this Section 5, neither party shall have any further liability under this Agreement or under the ERN, except for any obligations that are specifically stated to survive the termination of this Agreement (the “Surviving Obligations”).

6. Post-Closing Obligations. The Parties intend that certain activities must be performed after Closing, to confirm the sale of the Subject Property and to realize the development of the Subject Property by BRS if and as ultimately approved by the City in the normal course of entitlement and permitting review. Accordingly, the Parties shall undertake the following activities after Closing, reasonably and in good faith, which obligations shall survive the close of escrow. a. Release of Subject Property from Loan Obligations.
i. In the event that City is unable to obtain the release of the Subject Property from the Loan Obligations prior to Closing, as contemplated by Section 5(c)(1)(B), that failure shall not be deemed a pre-closing default within the meaning of Section 16. City shall have fifteen (15) business days after Closing, subject to a written agreement executed by both Parties extending such deadline, to secure such release by the recording of such documents as Title Company requires to remove the Loan Obligations as Monetary Exceptions to the Title Policy (“Union Bank Documents”), so that the Title Policy may be re-issued to BRS free from such Monetary Exceptions.

Commencement of the Due Diligence Period established by Section 6(e) shall be postponed until the date when the Union Bank Documents are recorded in the Official Records of Solano County (“Official Records”).
ii. To the extent that that the Union Bank Documents do not record within fifteen (15) days after Closing, as such date may be extended from time-to-time, Rescission shall occur within the meaning of and as provided in Section 7.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1228 of 1570 ends

Page 7 ends

b. Continued Operation of Golf Course. City shall continue to operate the golf course and attendant facilities on the Subject Property pursuant to the Golf Lease. For the avoidance of doubt, City shall be permitted to continue golf operations on the Subject Property after the Close of Escrow, and may continue to conduct such operations through Touchstone or any other management company that City may choose in its reasonable discretion. c. Reimbursement Agreement.
i. Within sixty (60) days after Closing, subject to a written agreement executed by both Parties extending such deadline, the Parties shall negotiate and execute an agreement to provide for BRS’ payment of City’s reasonable costs associated with the engagement of City Staff (if not subject to flat rate entitlement fees), third-party consultants and attorneys, including City’s legal counsel (outside or staff), contract project manager, and financial and engineering consultants, in connection with the review and processing of the BRS Applications, and, to the extent City’s involvement is necessary or desirable to BRS, the permits from resource agencies (“Reimbursement Agreement”).
ii. The Reimbursement Agreement shall be in the City’s usual form and will provide for an “evergreen deposit” of One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($100,000.00) to secure BRS’ obligations to pay such costs. The Parties contemplate that BRS’ first payment of costs due to City under the Reimbursement Agreement shall be payable no earlier than the latter of the following dates: (A) sixty (60) calendar days after Closing, (B) ninety (90) days prior to submittal of development applications by BRS.
iii. In the event that City and BRS are not able to timely negotiate and execute a Reimbursement Agreement, Rescission shall occur within the meaning of and as provided in Section 7.
d. Participation Agreement.
i. No later than one hundred twenty (120) days after closing, subject to a written agreement executed by both Parties extending such deadline, the Parties shall negotiate and execute a Participation Agreement by which the City will receive (A) additional consideration for the Subject Property after BRS’ receipt of final entitlements for a project on the Subject Property; and (B) additional consideration for the Subject Property at such time as (1) finished lots are sold to merchant builders for construction, or (2) BRS sells the improved residential and/or commercial property.
ii. In the event that City and BRS are not able to timely negotiate and execute a Participation Agreement, Rescission shall occur within the meaning of and as provided in Section 7.
e. Conduct of Due Diligence; Physical Inspections.
i. BRS shall have the opportunity to perform due diligence investigations after Close of Escrow, which investigations may include (A) a review of all the documents, materials DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1229 of 1570 ends

Page 8 ends

or information relating to the Subject Property, including without limitation those described on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively, the “Due Diligence Materials”), which shall be provided to BRS no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after Close of Escrow; and (B) a review of the physical condition of the Subject Property, including without limitation investigations, and tests of the Subject Property, including but not limited to, geotechnical soil borings, test pits, physical inspections and other environmental tests of the Subject Property (“Physical Inspections”), all at BRS’ sole risk, cost, and expense. ii. BRS shall complete its review of the Due Diligence Materials within forty-five (45) days after City delivers the Due Diligence Materials and shall complete its Physical Inspections within sixty (60) days after Close of Escrow (“Due Diligence Period”). iii. At the conclusion of the Due Diligence Period, BRS shall notify the City in writing as to whether it approves the Subject Property and intends to retain title (“Approval Notice”), or if it disapproves the Subject Property (“Disapproval Notice”). For the avoidance of doubt, BRS shall not issue a Disapproval Notice unless the Due Diligence Materials or Physical Inspections disclose conditions that BRS determines will materially impact BRS’s intended use and development of the Subject Property and or the value of the Subject Property. iv. If BRS issues a Disapproval Notice,, Rescission shall occur within the meaning of and as provided in Section 7. The failure by BRS to deliver its Disapproval Notice shall be deemed to be its approval of the Subject Property.
v. In the event BRS terminates this Agreement and exercises the right of Rescission, BRS shall return all Due Diligence Materials provided by City to BRS and shall permanently delete any electronic copies held by BRS.
f. Performance Agreement; Pursuit of Entitlements by BRS. i. Within one hundred twenty (120) after Closing, subject to a written agreement executed by both Parties extending such deadline, City and BRS shall negotiate and execute an agreement that includes a performance schedule pursuant to which BRS shall proceed with filing those applications and submittals that are and will be necessary to secure issuance of entitlements to develop the Subject Property (“Performance Agreement”). The Performance Agreement shall provide that (A) the requested entitlements shall be consistent with the limitations imposed on the development of the Subject Property by the Syar Agreement; and that (B) entitlements for the Subject Property shall be pursued in an expeditious manner, with reasonable diligence, and on a timeline that is generally consistent with the performance schedule, market conditions, and other similar factors, and the goal of completing expeditious development of the Subject Property, subject to force majeure, which shall be defined in the Performance Agreement.
ii. The Performance Agreement (or alternate form of agreement, as the Parties may agree) shall provide that the City shall have a power of termination (a reversionary interest) in the Subject Property (“Power of Termination”) as provided in Section 7(e). iii. The Performance Agreement (or alternate form of agreement, as the Parties may agree) shall provide that if the BRS Applications are not approved, and BRS is not able to DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1230 of 1570 ends

Page 9 ends

secure entitlements for a project, the nature of which project, shall be within BRS’ sole and absolute discretion, BRS shall have the right to require the City to repurchase the Subject Property by refunding to BRS the Purchase Price (inclusive of the Purchase Deposit and any unexpended amounts pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement, but exclusive of the Nonrefundable Consideration and Appraisal Fees) in consideration for BRS reconveying the Subject Property to the City. iv. Following execution of the Performance Agreement, a Memorandum of Agreement shall be recorded on title to the Subject Property to assure that the City’s Power of Termination is recorded in the chain of title for the Subject Property. v. BRS shall engage Norman, at its sole cost and expense, to develop a Conceptual Golf Site Design and Upgrade package (“Concept Plan”). Norman shall also prepare a construction estimate for the implementation of the Concept Plan. The Concept Plan shall be consistent with the limitations imposed on the development of the City Property by the Syar Agreement and any cost limitation imposed by City. City shall have the right to approve the cost and scope to develop the Concept Plan. Upon City approval of the cost and scope to develop the Concept Plan, BRS shall within thirty (30) days of approval of the cost and scope prepare and submit to the City the Concept Plan. Upon approval of the Concept Plan by City, and concurrently with submittal of the BRS Applications, BRS shall submit plans sufficient to permit (1) CEQA review of and approval of designs for the Golf Site design and upgrade; (2) the pursuit of entitlements (i.e., the Concept Plan shall include sufficient detail to permit the submittal of a development application and pursuit of entitlements, and shall include a site layout and grading plan, among other requirements); (3) an updated construction estimate for same; (4) allow the City or City Designee to obtain construction bids for the Golf Site design and upgrade. For the avoidance of doubt, BRS is not obligated to provide construction-level detail in the Concept Plan.
vi. In the event that City and BRS are not able to timely negotiate and execute a Performance Agreement, Rescission shall occur within the meaning of and as provided in Section 7.
vii. BRS may request that City enter into a development agreement in connection with its pursuit of entitlement applications for the Subject Property, which shall be considered by the City in the normal course of processing for such applications. g. CEQA Compliance. In compliance with CEQA, and to give members of the public the opportunity to be aware of the environmental consequences of a development project on the Subject Property, and to fully participate in the CEQA process, the Parties acknowledge that City has no obligation to approve a development project on the Subject Property and that any such project shall be subject to all applicable governmental approvals. City shall retain discretion in accordance with applicable law before action on the project by the City Council to (i) identify and impose mitigation measures to mitigate significant environmental impacts, (ii) select other feasible alternatives to avoid significant environmental impacts, (iii) balance the benefits of the project against any significant environmental impacts prior to taking final action if such significant impacts cannot otherwise be avoided, or (iv) determine not to proceed with the project. Any failure by City Council to grant such approvals after a public hearing thereon shall not constitute a default or a breach of the terms of this Agreement by City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1231 of 1570 ends

Page 10 ends

7. Rescission; Power of Termination.
a. In the event that the Union Bank Documents are not recorded as required by Section 6(a); if the Parties are not able to timely reach agreement on the Reimbursement Agreement, Participation Agreement, Performance Agreement, or if BRS issues a Disapproval Notice at the conclusion of the Due Diligence Period, the conveyance of the Subject Property to BRS shall be rescinded (“Rescission”).
b. In the event of Rescission, (i) BRS shall receive the return of the Purchase Deposit (less the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment and Appraisal Fees) and the Purchase Price, together with and any unexpended amounts pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement; (ii) the Parties shall execute and record a deed rescinding BRS’ acquisition of the Subject Property. (“Rescission Deed”).
c. For the avoidance of doubt, BRS shall not have a right of Rescission in connection with its pursuit of entitlements for the project, with CEQA, any development agreement, or with the City’s pursuit of development of golf or other improvements on that portion of the City Property retained by City.
d. In the event of Rescission, BRS shall not be entitled to reimbursement of any amounts expended pursuant to the Negotiation Fee, the City Cost Security Deposit, the Reimbursement Agreement, Performance Agreement or any costs associated with the processing of the BRS Applications.
e. In the event that BRS fails to comply with the Performance Agreement, the City may exercise the Power of Termination under the Performance Agreement (Cal. Civ.

Code § 885.010, et seq.), in which case fee ownership of the Subject Property shall be returned to the City and BRS shall receive the return of the Purchase Price and such other sums as the Parties negotiate in the Performance Agreement.

8. Conditions Precedent. The following shall be the conditions precedent to the applicable Party’s obligations to consummate the purchase and sale transaction contemplated herein:
a. Conditions to BRS’ Obligations. BRS’ obligations hereunder, including, but not limited to, its obligation to consummate the purchase transaction provided for herein, are subject to the satisfaction, in BRS’ sole and absolute discretion, of each of the following conditions, each of which is for the sole benefit of BRS and may only be waived by BRS in writing:
i. City’s Representations and Warranties. Each representation and warranty made in this Agreement by City shall be true and correct in all material respects at the time as of which the same is made and as of the Close of Escrow.
ii. Purchase Price. The Purchase shall have been established and approved by BRS and City.
iii. Approval of Legal Description. The legal description pursuant to which the Subject Property shall be conveyed to BRS shall have been approved by BRS and City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1232 of 1570 ends

Page 11 ends

iv. Delivery of the Golf Lease. A fully executed copy of the Golf Lease shall have been delivered to Escrow by City.
v. Owner’s Title Policy. Title Company shall be irrevocably committed to issue, at the Closing, its standard coverage owner’s title insurance policy (and provided BRS provides the Survey to the Title Company (in a form that meets the Title Company’s reasonable requirements), its extended coverage ALTA Owner’s Title Insurance Policy (2021 Form), with liability equal to the Purchase Price, or in such greater amount as BRS may request and to which Title Company may agree to underwrite, showing fee title to the Subject Property vested in BRS, free and clear of any and all tenancies and/or occupancy rights of third parties affecting all or any portion of the Subject Property, with the limited exception of the existing lease to Touchstone, and subject only to the Permitted Exceptions (the “Owner’s Title Policy”).
vi. City Deliveries. City shall have delivered to Escrow Agent the items described in Section 10(a) hereof.
vii. No Pending Action. There shall exist no pending actions, suits, arbitrations, proceedings, assignments for the benefit of creditors, insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceedings, against City that would materially and adversely affect City’s ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement. viii. Condemnation. This Agreement shall not have been terminated by BRS as a result of any condemnation or threatened condemnation of the Subject Property as described in Sections 14(a)(vi) and 15 hereof.
ix. BRS’ Waiver of Conditions. BRS may at any time or times on or before the Close of Escrow, at its sole election, waive any of the conditions precedent to BRS’ obligations under this Section 8(a) or otherwise and consummate the sale, but any such waiver shall be effective only if contained in a writing signed by BRS and delivered to City. In the event any of the conditions precedent for the benefit of BRS that are contained in this Agreement are not completely fulfilled and satisfied, then in addition to any other rights or remedies BRS may have, BRS may, prior to the Closing Date (defined below), terminate its obligation to purchase the Subject Property, and (A) the Purchase Deposit and all accrued interest thereon shall immediately refunded to BRS (less the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment and Appraisal Fees and any amounts due to Escrow Agent from BRS pursuant to this Agreement); (B) BRS’ obligation to purchase, and City’s obligation to sell, the Subject Property shall terminate; and (C) neither Party shall have any further obligation to the other except, except as to the Surviving Obligations. Any unexpended amounts pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement shall be returned to BRS by City outside of Escrow.
b. Conditions to City’s Obligations. City’s obligations hereunder, including, but not limited to, its obligation to consummate the purchase transaction provided for herein, are subject to the satisfaction, in City’s sole and absolute discretion, of each of the following conditions, each of which is for the sole benefit of City and may be waived by City in writing:
i. Purchase Price. The Purchase shall have been established and approved by BRS and City.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1233 of 1570 ends

Page 12 ends

ii. Approval of Legal Description. The legal description pursuant to which the Subject Property shall be conveyed to BRS shall have been approved by BRS and City. iii. Delivery of the Golf Lease. A fully executed copy of the Golf Lease shall have been delivered to Escrow by BRS.
iv. BRS Deliveries. BRS shall have delivered to Escrow Agent the items required to be delivered by BRS pursuant to Section 10(b). v. Due Performance. BRS shall not be in default under this Agreement and shall have duly performed each and every covenant, undertaking and agreement to be performed by it prior to the Close of Escrow hereunder.
vi. BRS’ Representations and Warranties. Each representation and warranty made in this Agreement by BRS shall be true and correct in all material respects at the time as of which the same is made and as of the Close of Escrow.
vii. City’s Waiver of Conditions. City may at any time or times on or before the Close of Escrow, at its sole election, waive any of the conditions precedent to City’s obligations under this Section 8(b) or otherwise and consummate the sale, but any such waiver shall be effective only if contained in a writing signed by City and delivered to BRS. In the event any of the conditions precedent for the benefit of City that are contained in this Agreement are not completely fulfilled and satisfied, then in addition to any other rights or remedies City may have, City may, prior to the Closing, terminate its obligation to convey the Subject Property, and the Purchase Deposit and all accrued interest thereon shall immediately refunded to BRS, less the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment and Appraisal Fees, and any amounts due to Escrow Holder from BRS pursuant to this Agreement, BRS’ obligation to purchase, and City’s obligation to sell, the Subject Property shall terminate, and neither Party shall have any further obligation to the other except as otherwise provided in this Agreement. Any unexpended amounts pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement shall be returned to BRS by City outside of Escrow.

9. Covenants During Escrow. From the Effective Date until the earlier of the Closing or the termination by BRS or City of its obligation to complete the transfer of the Subject Property, BRS and City, as applicable, covenant and agree to the following:
a. Operation of the Subject Property Prior to Close of Escrow. i. Affirmative Covenants. City shall (A) pay all taxes and assessments, and service all debt secured by the Subject Property, if any, prior to delinquency, (B) maintain and operate the Subject Property in substantially its current condition, and (C) maintain property and liability insurance related to the Subject Property at the level and with the insurance companies that City currently maintains.
ii. Negative Covenants. Following BRS’ delivery of an executed copy of this Agreement, City shall not, except as otherwise specifically permitted or required pursuant to this Agreement, or as otherwise agreed or permitted by BRS in writing in BRS’ sole and absolute discretion, (A) grant, create or allow the creation of any easement, right-of-way, encumbrance, lien, restriction, DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1234 of 1570 ends

Page 13 ends

right of occupancy or assessment affecting the Subject Property or otherwise cause or permit any other change to the state of title with respect to the Subject Property, (B) amend, extend or otherwise modify the terms of any existing lease, easement, right-of-way, encumbrance, lien, restriction or assessment that affects the Subject Property (except as may be necessary to release the Subject Property from any existing mortgage obligation), (C) sell, transfer or otherwise convey or terminate, amend or otherwise modify any Intangible Property relating exclusively to the Subject Property, (D) enter into any further or amend any existing agreements, contracts, leases or rights of occupancy with respect to the Subject Property, with the exception of the Touchstone Agreement or any other Agreement relating to the operation of the Golf Course, (E) cause or permit any Hazardous Materials (as defined in Section 14(a)(viii) below) to be used, stored, released, discharged or generated on the Subject Property in violation of applicable law, or (F) cause or permit any material changes to the physical condition of the Subject Property.
b. City Contracts. With the exception of City’s agreement with Touchstone, City shall cause any and all charges, fees, costs or expenses that have accrued under any contracts or agreements relating exclusively to the Subject Property to which City is a party (“Contracts”) to be paid in full and terminated on or prior to the Close of Escrow. This Section 9(b) shall survive the Close of Escrow.

10. Closing Deliverables.
a. City’s Closing Deliveries. Not less than one (1) business day prior to the Closing Date, City shall deliver or cause to be delivered to Escrow Agent the following items:
i. The amount of Closing Costs and Prorations allocated to City, as provided by Sections 12 and 13;
ii. One (1) fully executed and acknowledged grant deed conveying the Real Subject Property in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit E (“Grant Deed”); iii. A Certificate of Non-Foreign Status duly executed by City certifying that City is not a “foreign person” within the meaning of Section 1445(f)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, together with the equivalent California form (Form 593) confirming that City is not subject to withholding of any portion of the Purchase Price by BRS pursuant to the California Revenue & Taxation Code (collectively, the “Non-Foreign Affidavits”); iv. One (1) fully executed original of a general assignment agreement (the “General Assignment”) conveying to BRS the Intangible Property in the substantially form attached hereto as Exhibit F.
v. One(1) fully executed original of the Golf Lease; and vi. Any other document, instrument or agreement necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated herein reasonably requested by BRS or Escrow Agent. b. BRS’ Closing Deliveries. On or prior to the Closing Date, BRS shall deliver to Escrow Agent the following items:

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1235 of 1570 ends

Page 14 ends

i. The Closing Funds;
ii. One(1) fully executed original of the Golf Lease;
iii. One (1) fully executed Collaborative Use Easement as required by the Syar Agreement, in recordable form;
iv. One (1) fully executed original of the Preliminary Change of Ownership Report (“PCOR”);
v. One (1) fully executed original of the Transfer Tax Information Statement; and
vi. Any other documents, instruments or agreements necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated herein reasonably requested by City or Escrow Agent.

11. Escrow and Closing.
a. Escrow Instructions. When this Agreement or counterparts hereof shall have been executed by City and BRS and delivered to Escrow Agent, it shall constitute Escrow Agent’s escrow instructions. Any standard form escrow instructions submitted by Escrow Agent or any other clarification or addition to the instructions contained herein shall, when executed by BRS and City, constitute additional escrow instructions. In the event of any conflict between such additional instructions and this Agreement, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail. b. Closing. The “Close of Escrow” or “Closing” means the date on which the Grant Deed conveying title to the Subject Property to BRS is recorded. The Close of Escrow shall occur on or before Wednesday, December 28, 2022 (the “Closing Date”). The Closing Date may be extended by the Parties, but may not be extended beyond Friday, December 30, 2022 (“Outside Closing Date”)”). Any extension of the Outside Closing Date shall be confirmed by the Parties in writing.
c. Close of Escrow. If and when BRS and City have deposited into Escrow the funds and documents required by this Agreement, and all closing conditions have been satisfied or waived by the applicable party, and Title Company is irrevocably committed to issue the Owner’s Policy and Lender’s Policy concurrently with the Close of Escrow, Escrow Holder shall do the following:
i. Record Documents. Cause the following documents to be recorded in the Official Records: (A) Grant Deed, (B) Collaborative Use Easement, and (C) Union Bank Documents (if available).
ii. Deliver to BRS. Immediately upon the recording of the Grant Deed, deliver to BRS: (A) a conformed copy of the Grant Deed and Collaborative Use Easement; (B) the Non-Foreign Affidavits (if required); (C) fully executed originals of the General Assignment; (D) any DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1236 of 1570 ends

Page 15 ends

funds deposited by BRS, and any interest earned thereon, in excess of the amount required to be paid by BRS hereunder; and (E) the Owner’s Title Policy.
iii. Deliveries to City; Holdback of Purchase Price.

A. Immediately upon the recording of the Grant Deed, deliver to City: a conformed copy of the recorded Grant Deed, Collaborative Use Easement, and the Union Bank Documents (if recorded).

B. Escrow Agent shall retain that portion of the Closing Funds otherwise due to City pursuant to this Agreement (“Sales Proceeds”) until such time as Escrow Agent is notified by the Parties that the Loan Obligations are released (if not released prior to Close of Escrow); the Reimbursement Agreement, Participation Agreement, Performance Schedule are finalized; and BRS issued an Approval Notice at the conclusion of the Due Diligence Period. For the avoidance of doubt, the timelines established by this Agreement provide that all of the foregoing conditions on the release of the Sales Proceeds to City shall occur approximately one-hundred-twenty one (121) days after Closing (i.e., the Due Diligence Period expires sixty (60) days after Close of Escrow, and the balance of the conditions on release of the Sales Proceeds shall be satisfied no later than one-hundred-twenty (120) days thereafter) unless amendments of these timelines are agreed to by both Parties in writing. City acknowledges, however, that such timelines may be extended if the Loan Obligations are not released and the Union Bank Documents recorded before Closing.
d. Real Estate Reporting Person. Escrow Agent is hereby instructed to comply with all applicable Federal, state and local reporting and withholding requirements relating to the close of this transaction. Escrow Holder is hereby designated the “real estate reporting person” for purposes of Section 6045 of Title 26 of the United States Code and Treasury Regulation 1.60454 and any instructions or settlement statement prepared by Escrow Holder shall so provide. Upon the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement, Escrow Agent shall, in addition to complying with any applicable state and local requirements, file Form 1099 information return and send the statement to City as required under the aforementioned statute and regulation.

12. Closing Cost Allocation.
a. BRS shall pay (i) Escrow Agent’s escrow fee; (ii) Title Company’s charges for the Owner’s Title Policy, including any charges for extended title coverage and any additional title endorsements requested by BRS; and (iii) recording fees associated with recording the Grant Deed and Collaborative Use Easement in the Official Records. b. City shall pay (i) any City, County and/or other documentary transfer stamps, if any; and (ii) all fees and costs (including without limitation Escrow Agent’s fee, recording fees, and Title Company charges) associated with the release of the Loan Obligations and/or the recording of the Union Bank Documents in the Official Records. City’s obligations to pay such costs concerning the Loan Obligations and/or the Union Bank Documents shall survive the Close of Escrow. c. All other closing costs and charges attributable to BRS’ acquisition of the Subject Property shall be paid by the Parties in accordance with the customary practice in the County DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1237 of 1570 ends

Page 16 ends

where the property is located. All other closing costs and changes attributable to the release of the Loan Obligations and/or the Union Bank Documents shall be borne by City, which obligation shall survive the Close of Escrow.
d. The foregoing provisions of this Section 12 notwithstanding, should the obligations of BRS to purchase, and City to sell, the Subject Property be terminated in accordance with this Agreement, BRS and City shall each pay one-half (½ ) of the cost of the escrow cancellation fees and other amounts due Escrow Agent and the Title Company; provided, however, that should this Escrow be terminated as a result of the default by one of the Parties hereto, the defaulting Party shall pay the entire amount of the cancellation fees and other amounts due Escrow Agent and the Title Company, and the non-defaulting Party shall have no liability therefor. e. BRS shall pay its own attorneys’ fees in connection with the preparation and negotiation of this Agreement and in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby. All fees of the City shall remain subject to the Reimbursement Agreement.

13. Prorations. All non-delinquent taxes and assessments applicable to the Subject Property, including, without limitation, all property taxes and assessments shall be prorated as of the Close of Escrow on the basis of the actual number of days of the month that have elapsed as of the Close of Escrow and based upon a three-hundred-sixty-five (365) day year. With respect to prorations related to real property taxes and assessments, the basis for said proration shall be the amount shown for real property taxes and assessments in the most recent installment for the fiscal year in which the Close of Escrow occurs. If no installment for the fiscal year in which Close of Escrow occurs is available, BRS and City shall reasonably estimate such installment which shall be used to prorate taxes and assessments. No adjustment shall be made for any change in the real property taxes and assessments occurring by virtue of the sale of the Subject Property to BRS. The amount of such prorations shall be subject to adjustment in cash after the Close of Escrow outside of Escrow as and when complete and accurate information becomes available, if such information is not available on the Closing Date. City and BRS agree to cooperate and use their good faith efforts to make such adjustments prior to ninety (90) days after the Close of Escrow, if updated tax bills are available. This Section 13 shall survive the Closing for two (2) years.

14. Representations and Warranties.
a. Representations and Warranties of City. City hereby makes the following representations to BRS, which representations are true in all respects as of the date hereof and as of the Closing.
i. Due Authorization.

A. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by City have been duly authorized by the requisite action on the part of City, and no other authorization or consent is required therefor. No approvals, authorizations or consents of any public body or any other person or entity (except for those already obtained) are necessary in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of City, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms against City, subject only DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1238 of 1570 ends

Page 17 ends

to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws or equitable principles affecting or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally.

B. BRS also acknowledges that City requires authorization from Union Bank to release the Subject Property from the Loan Obligations. Union Bank’s failure to provide such authorization prior to the Closing, as provided by Section 6(a) shall not be deemed a breach of this representation or a pre-closing breach of this Agreement within the meaning of Section 16.
ii. No Options. City has not granted any option or right of first refusal or first opportunity to any party to acquire any interest in the Subject Property. iii. Due Diligence Materials. To City’s knowledge, the Due Diligence Materials are complete, include the various items identified on Exhibit D, and will include all contracts and agreements that concern the Subject Property, including all contracts related to the rights of third parties to use, possess, occupy, improve, or maintain the Subject Property (which representation shall survive the closing).
iv. Eminent Domain. To City’s knowledge, there are no existing, proposed, threatened or contemplated eminent domain proceedings that would affect the Subject Property in any way whatsoever.
v. Litigation. To City’s knowledge, there is no adverse claim (including mechanic’s liens), litigation or administrative proceeding or governmental investigation pending or threatened in writing, that does or will have a material, adverse effect on City or the Subject Property. vi. Violations of Law. To City’s knowledge, no notices of any material violation of governmental regulations, ordinances or laws relating to the Subject Property have been received by City or, to City’s knowledge, entered against City written the twelve (12) months prior to the Effective Date.
vii. Violation of Agreements. To City’s knowledge, neither this Agreement nor anything provided to be done hereunder, including but not limited to, the transfer, assignment and sale of the Subject Property, violates or shall violate any contract, agreement or instrument to which City is a party or that affects the Subject Property or any part thereof. viii. Hazardous Materials. City has not received from or given to any governmental authority or other party any notice or other communication or agreement relating in any way to the presence, placement, generation, transportation, storage, release, treatment or disposal of any Hazardous Materials or other environmental conditions on, at, under or about the Subject Property. As used herein, “Hazardous Materials” shall mean any “Hazardous Material,” “Hazardous Substance,” “Pollutant” or “Contaminant,” “Petroleum” and “Natural Gas Liquids” as those terms are defined or used in Section 101 of CERCLA or any substance which is defined as a hazardous material, hazardous waste, or hazardous substance in any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation, and any other substance regulated because of its affect or potential effect on public health or the environment, including, but not limited to, any radioactive substance, hydrocarbons, industrial solvents, metals, flammable materials, explosives or other hazardous substance or toxic material.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1239 of 1570 ends

Page 18 ends

ix. Bankruptcy. No attachments or execution proceedings and no assignments for the benefit of creditors, insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceedings are pending or threatened against City or concerning all or part of the Subject Property, nor are any such proceedings contemplated by City. City has not been insolvent for the last one-hundredtwenty (120) days preceding the Effective Date. x. No Bonds. City has not posted any bonds or other collateral with any governmental authorities to secure performance of any obligations with respect to the development of the Subject Property.
xi. Anti-Money Laundering. City is in compliance with the requirements of Executive Order No. 13224, 66 Fed. Reg. 49079 (Sept. 23, 2001) (the “Order”) and other similar requirements contained in the rules and regulations of the Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of the Treasury (“OFAC”) and in any enabling legislation or other Executive Orders or regulations in respect thereof (the Order and such other rules, regulations, legislation, or orders are collectively called the “Orders”).
xii. Prohibited Transactions. City (A) is not listed on the “Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List” maintained by OFAC pursuant to the Order and/or on any other list of terrorists or terrorist organizations maintained pursuant to any of the rules and regulations of OFAC or pursuant to any other applicable Orders (such lists are collectively referred to as the “Lists”); (B) is not a person who has been determined by competent authority to be subject to the prohibitions contained in the Orders; or (C) is not or has not engaged in any dealings or transactions with any Forbidden Entity. A “Forbidden Entity” is defined as (Y) the governments of Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Myanmar, Syria and Sudan (each, a “Prohibited Country”) and any of their agencies, including, but not limited to political units and subdivisions (each, a “Prohibited Government”); and (Z) any company that (1) is wholly or partially managed or controlled by a Prohibited Government, (2) is established, organized under, or whose principal place of business is in any Prohibited Country, or (3) has failed to submit an affidavit following request therefore averring that it does not own or control any property or asset in and has not and does not transact business with any Prohibited Country. For purposes of this Section, a “company” is any entity whether publicly traded or privately owned capable of affecting commerce, including, but not limited to, a government, government agency, natural person, legal person, sole proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, subsidiary, affiliate, franchisor, franchisee, joint venture, trade association, financial institution, utility, public franchise, provider of financial services, trust, or enterprise and any association thereof. b. Representations and Warranties of BRS. BRS hereby makes the representations and warranties set forth in this section for the benefit of City and its successors and assigns. BRS shall notify City in writing immediately if BRS becomes aware that any representation or warranty has become untrue or misleading in light of information obtained by BRS after the Effective Date.
i. Authority. BRS is a limited liability company duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Delaware and has been qualified to do business in the State of California, or shall be so qualified on or before the Effective Date. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by BRS have been duly authorized by the requisite action on the part of BRS, and no other authorization or consent is required therefor. No DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1240 of 1570 ends

Page 19 ends

approvals, authorizations or consents of any public body or any other person or entity (except for those already obtained) are necessary in connection with this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. This Agreement constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of BRS, and is enforceable in accordance with its terms against BRS, subject only to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws or equitable principles affecting or limiting the rights of contracting parties generally.
ii. No Conflict. The execution and delivery of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereunder on the part of BRS do not and will not violate any applicable law, ordinance, statute, rule, regulation, order, decree or judgment, conflict with or result in the breach of any terms or provisions of, or constitute a default under, or result in the creation or imposition of any lien, charge, or encumbrance upon any of the property or assets of BRS by reason of the terms of any contract, mortgage, lien, lease, agreement, indenture, instrument or judgment to which BRS is a part or which is or purports to be binding upon BRS or which otherwise affects BRS, which will not be discharged, assumed or released at the Close of Escrow. iii. Litigation. There are no claims, actions, suits or proceeding continuing, pending or to BRS’ actual knowledge, threatened, which would materially adversely affect BRS’ ability to perform the transaction contemplated by this Agreement. iv. Bankruptcy. No attachments or execution proceedings and no assignments for the benefit of creditors, insolvency, bankruptcy, reorganization or other proceedings are pending or threatened against BRS or concerning any of BRS’ assets, nor are any of such proceedings contemplated by BRS, nor has BRS ever been a debtor under any case commenced under the United States Bankruptcy Code. BRS has not been insolvent for the last one-hundredtwenty (120) days preceding the Effective Date. v. Financial Capability. BRS is financially able to fully perform hereunder. vi. Anti-Money Laundering. BRS is in compliance with the requirements of the Order, and other similar requirements contained in the rules and regulations of OFAC, and in any enabling legislation.
vii. Prohibited Transactions. BRS (A) is not listed on the Lists; (B) is not a person who has been determined by competent authority to be subject to the prohibitions contained in the Orders; or (C) is not or has not engaged in any dealings or transactions with any Forbidden Entity; and (D) any company that (1) is wholly or partially managed or controlled by a Prohibited Government, (2) is established, organized under, or whose principal place of business is in any Prohibited Country, or (3) has failed to submit an affidavit following request therefore averring that it does not own or control any property or asset in and has not and does not transact business with any Prohibited Country. For purposes of this Section, a “company” is any entity whether publicly traded or privately owned capable of affecting commerce, including, but not limited to, a government, government agency, natural person, legal person, sole proprietorship, partnership, firm, corporation, subsidiary, affiliate, franchisor, franchisee, joint venture, trade association, financial institution, utility, public franchise, provider of financial services, trust, or enterprise and any association thereof.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1241 of 1570 ends

Page 20 ends

c. Survival of Representations. The express representations and warranties made in this Agreement shall survive the Close of Escrow for a period of six (6) months and shall not merge into any instrument or conveyance delivered at the Close of Escrow.

15. Condemnation & Casualty.
a. Condemnation. If before the Close of Escrow, all or any portion of the Subject Property is subject to an actual or threatened taking by a governmental or quasi-governmental entity or public authority, by the power of eminent domain or otherwise, BRS shall have the right, exercisable by giving written notice to City within fifteen (15) days after BRS’ receipt of written notice from City of such taking to either (i) to terminate its obligation to purchase the Subject Property, in which case the Purchase Deposit (less the Nonrefundable. Consideration Payment and Appraisal Fees) shall be immediately refunded to BRS, less any amounts due to Escrow Holder from BRS pursuant to this Agreement, BRS’ obligation to purchase, and City’s obligation to sell, the Subject Property shall terminate (with any unexpended amounts pursuant to the Negotiation Fee or City Cost Security Deposit shall be returned to BRS by City outside of Escrow), and neither Party shall have any further obligation to the other except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, or (ii) to accept the applicable portion of the Subject Property in its then existing condition, in which case, all condemnation awards shall be paid or assigned to BRS. If BRS elects to proceed under clause (ii) above, City shall not compromise, settle or adjust any claims to such condemnation award without BRS’ prior written consent. BRS’ failure to deliver such notice within the time period specified shall be deemed to constitute BRS’ election to terminate its obligation to purchase the Subject Property. In the event that condemnation awards are tendered to BRS under this Section 15(a) and Rescission later occurs or the City exercises a Power of Termination, the proceeds of any condemnation awards shall be returned to City.
b. Casualty. BRS shall have no right to terminate this Agreement in the event of any casualty to the Subject Property or any improvements that may be located on the Subject Property, as BRS is acquiring the Subject Property for development purposes.

16. Default and Remedies.
a. Notice of Default; Opportunity to Cure. Any failure by Party to perform any obligation established by this Agreement (i.e., a pre- or post-closing obligation) or its failure to observe or perform any other provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be a breach of this Agreement, provided that such failure continues for five (5) business days after written notice thereof; provided that if the nature of such breach is such that the same cannot reasonably be cured within a five (5) business day period, the Party alleged to be in breach shall not be deemed to be in default if it diligently commences such cure within such period and thereafter diligently proceeds to rectify and cure such default, but in no event exceeding a period of time in excess of ten (10) calendar days after written notice thereof. In no event shall either Party have the right to cure a pre-Closing default after the Outside Closing Date.
b. Remedies for Defaults.
i. City Pre-Closing Default. In the event of a material pre-closing default by City under this Agreement, BRS shall have either (A) the right to pursue specific performance of DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1242 of 1570 ends

Page 21 ends

this Agreement, provided that an action for specific performance is filed with the Superior Court for the County where the Subject Property is located within sixty (60) days after City’s alleged default, or (B) the right to terminate this Agreement and recover the Purchase Deposit, less the Nonrefundable Consideration Payment and Appraisal Fees. Any unexpended amounts pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement shall be returned to BRS by City outside of Escrow. ii. BRS Pre-Closing Default. In the event of a material pre-closing default by BRS under this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in which case the Purchase Deposit shall be retained by City.

In the event of a post-closing default by City or BRS under any of the agreement(s) outlined in Section 6 of this Agreement, the remedies provided in such agreement(s) shall apply, rather than this Section 16.

17. No Waiver. The waiver by one Party of the performance of any covenant, condition or promise shall not invalidate this Agreement nor shall it be considered a waiver by such Party of any other covenant, condition or promise hereunder. The waiver by either or both Parties of the time for performing any act shall not constitute a waiver of the time for performing any other act or identical act required to be performed at a later time. The exercise of any remedy provided by law and the provisions of this Agreement for any remedy shall not exclude other consistent remedies unless they are expressly excluded.

18. Construction. As used in this Agreement, the masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural numbers shall each be deemed to include the other whenever the context indicates. This Agreement shall be construed as a whole and in accordance with its fair meaning, the captions being for convenience only and not intended to fully describe or define the provisions in the portions of the Agreement to which they pertain. Each Party hereto, and counsel for each Party hereto, has reviewed and revised this Agreement, and the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not be employed in the interpretation or construction of this Agreement. This document shall, in all respects, be governed by the laws of the State of California applicable to agreements executed and to be wholly performed within the State of California. Nothing contained herein shall be construed so as to require the commission of any act contrary to law, and wherever there is any conflict between any provision contained herein and any present or future statute, law, ordinance or regulation contrary to which the Parties have no legal right to contract, the latter shall prevail but the provision of this document that is affected shall be curtailed and limited only to the extent necessary to bring it within the requirements of the law.

19. No Personal Liability.
a. Without affecting the obligations or liabilities of the entities comprising BRS, no shareholder of BRS or any shareholder, member or equity holder or affiliate of BRS or any of their respective directors, officers, agents, consultants or employees will be personally liable to City for any claim, loss, expense or liability arising from or in connection with this Agreement, and City hereby waives any such liability. This Section 19(a) shall not impact City’s ability to exercise the remedies provided in Section 16(b)(ii) in the event of a breach of this Agreement by BRS prior to the Close of Escrow.

DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1243 of 1570 ends

Page 22 ends

b. No elected official, officer, agent, consultant or employee of City will be personally liable to BRS for any claim, loss, expense or liability arising from or in connection with this Agreement, and BRS hereby waives any such liability.

20. Merger/Integration. The Parties intend this paragraph to be a conclusive recital of fact pursuant to Section 622 of the California Evidence Code. This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto supersede any prior agreement, oral or written, including without limitation the ERN, as amended, and contain the entire agreement between the Parties on the subject matter hereof. This Agreement (including the exhibits attached hereto) is intended to be a final expression of the agreement of the Parties and is an integrated agreement within the meaning of Section 1856 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. No subsequent agreement, representation or promise made by either Party hereto, or by or to any employee, officer, agent or representative of either Party shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the Party to be bound thereby. There are no contemporaneous separate written or oral agreements between the Parties in any way related to the subject matter of this Agreement, with the exception those documents specifically identified herein.

21. Amendments. This Agreement and any modifications, amendments or supplements thereto may be executed in several counterparts, and all so executed shall constitute one agreement binding on all parties hereto, notwithstanding that all parties are not signatories to the original or the same counterpart. The parties may also deliver executed copies of this Agreement to each other by facsimile or electronic mail, which facsimile or electronic mail signatures shall be binding. Any facsimile or electronic mail delivery of signatures shall be followed by the delivery of executed originals.

22. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by facsimile. Each such counterpart hereof shall be deemed to be an original instrument but all such counterparts together shall constitute but one agreement.

23. Survival. Subject to any specific limitations described in this Agreement, All covenants, agreements, representations and warranties made herein shall survive the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Close of Escrow, the recording of the Grant Deed conveying the Subject Property to BRS and all deliveries contemplated herein.

24. Computation of Periods. All periods of time referred to in this Agreement shall include all Saturdays, Sundays and State or National holidays, unless the period of time specifies “business days”, in which case such period of time shall exclude Saturdays, Sundays and State and National holidays; provided that if the date or last date to perform any act or give any notice with respect to this Agreement shall fall on a Saturday, Sunday or State or National holiday, such act or notice may be timely performed or given on the next succeeding day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or State or National holiday. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase “State and National holiday” shall refer to any day in which the Escrow Agent, Title Company and/or the Office of the County Recorder for the County of Solano is/are closed for business.

25. Independent Counsel. EACH PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT ADMITS,

ACKNOWLEDGES AND REPRESENTS THAT IT HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO

CONSULT WITH AND BE REPRESENTED BY INDEPENDENT COUNSEL OF SUCH DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1244 of 1570 ends

Page 23 ends

PARTY’S CHOICE IN CONNECTION WITH THE NEGOTIATION, EXECUTION AND AMENDMENT OF THIS AGREEMENT. EACH PARTY FURTHER ADMITS,

ACKNOWLEDGES AND REPRESENTS THAT IT HAS NOT RELIED ON ANY

REPRESENTATION OR STATEMENT MADE BY ANY OF THE ATTORNEYS AND

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE OTHER PARTY WITH REGARD TO THE SUBJECT MATTER, BASIS, OR EFFECT OF THIS AGREEMENT.

26. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assignable by BRS without City’s prior written consent, which consent may be granted or withheld in City’s sole discretion, which may be withheld for any reason or no reason whatsoever. Notwithstanding the above, BRS shall be permitted to assign this Agreement to a member of BRS, an affiliate of BRS, or to a legal entity under common control with BRS (“Permitted Assignee”), and need only provide City with notice of such assignment, provided that the Permitted Assignee shall assume BRS’ obligations under this Agreement. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, successors, and permitted assigns of the Parties, and each of them.

27. No Obligation to Third Parties. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon, nor obligate either of the Parties hereto, to any person or entity other than each other.

28. Legal Fees. If either BRS or City brings any action, arbitration or suit against the other for any matter relating to or arising out of this Agreement, then the prevailing party in such action or dispute, whether by final judgment or settlement and including any appeals, shall be entitled to recover from the other party all costs and expenses of suit, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expert witness fees. Any judgment or order entered in any final judgment shall contain a specific provision providing for the recovery of all costs and expenses of suit, including reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing, perfecting and executing such judgment.

29. Tax Deferred Exchange. The Parties agree to cooperate with each other in effecting a tax-deferred exchange or exchanges under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031; provided, however, that (a) consummation of this Agreement is not predicated or conditioned on an exchange, (b) the Close of Escrow shall not be delayed due to any exchange, (c) any rights of the non-exchanging Party pursuant to this Agreement shall not be impaired due to any exchange requested by the other Party, (d) the non-exchanging Party shall incur no additional costs, expenses or liabilities as a result of or in connection with any exchange requested by the other Party except those incurred in connection with the non-exchanging Party’s review of customary exchange documentation, and (e) the non-exchanging Party shall not be required to take title to any other property in connection with any exchange requested by the other Party. Subject to the foregoing, the Parties agree to execute customary escrow instructions, documents, agreements, or instruments to effect an exchange. Each Party agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the other Party free and harmless from and against any liability, loss, damage, cost or expense (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses) that may arise from the indemnifying Party’s exchange.

30. Broker. BRS and City each represent and warrant that no broker, salesman or finder has been engaged by it in connection with any of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or, to its knowledge, is in any way connected with any of such transactions. In the event of any other claim for broker’s, consultant’s or finder’s fees or commissions in connection with the negotiation, DocuSign Envelope ID: DD048B7C-3F32-4019-B775-453A28F31325

Page 1245 of 1570 ends

Vallejo City CouncilSeptember 9, 2025

Vallejo City Council
September 9, 2025