Vallejo City Council
May 12, 2026

discretion, without any obligation to consider any proposed assignment, sublet or transfer in good faith or otherwise. Tenant's attempted assignment/subletting without first obtaining Landlord's written consent shall be void at Landlord's election. Landlord's consent to one assignment or subletting shall not be deemed a consent to subsequent assignments and/or sublettings. The merger of Tenant with any other entity or the transfer of any controlling or managing ownership or beneficial interest in Tenant, or the assignment of a substantial portion of the assets of Tenant, whether or not located at the Premises shall constitute an assignment hereunder. In the event Tenant shall assign or sublet the Premises or request the consent of Landlord to any assignment or subletting or ifTenant shall request the consent of Landlord for any other act Tenant proposes to do then Tenant shall pay Landlord's attorneys' fees incurred in connection with each such request.

16. ESTOPPEL, ATTORNMENT AND SUBORDINATION.

16.1. Estoppel. Within ten (10) days after request by Landlord, Tenant shall deliver an estoppel certificate duly executed and acknowledged to any proposed mortgagee, beneficiary, purchaser, or Landlord, in a commercially reasonable form substantially similar to that requested and a statement certifying, without limitation: (i) the date of commencement ofthis Lease; (ii) the fact that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect (or, ifthere have been modifications hereto, that this Lease is in full force and effect, as modified, and stating the date and nature of such modifications); (iii) the date to which the rental and other sums payable under this Lease have been paid; (iv) the fact that there are no current defaults under this Lease by either Landlord or Tenant except as specified in Tenant's statement; (v) no deposit of any nature has been made in connection with the Lease (other than deposits the nature and amount of which are expressly described in the Lease), and (vi) such other matters requested by Landlord.

Landlord and Tenant intend that any statement delivered pursuant to this Section 16 may be relied upon by any mortgagee, beneficiary, purchaser or prospective purchaser of the Premises, the Property or any interest therein. Tenant's failure to deliver such statement within such time shall be conclusive upon Tenant that (i) this Lease is in full force and effect, without modification except as may be represented by Landlord; (ii) there are no uncured defaults in Landlord's performance, (iii) not more than one (1) month's rental has been paid in advance; and (iv) no deposit of any nature has been made in connection with the Lease except as represented by Landlord. Except to the extent caused by Landlord's sole or active negligence or willful misconduct, Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from and against any and all damages, penalties, fines, taxes, costs, liabilities, losses and expenses (including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) which Landlord may sustain or incur as a result of or in connection with Tenant's failure or delay in delivering such estoppel certificate. If any financier should require that this Lease be amended (other than in the description of the Premises, the Term, the permitted uses, the Rent or as will substantially, materially and adversely affect the rights of Tenant), Landlord shall give written notice thereof to Tenant, which notice shall be accompanied by a Lease supplement embodying such amendments. Tenant shall, within ten (10) days after the receipt of Landlord's notice, execute and deliver to Landlord the tendered Lease supplement.

16.2. Subordination. This Lease shall be subject and subordinate to all ground leases, CC&Rs, and the lien of all mortgages and deeds of trust which now or hereafter affect the Premises or the Property or Landlord's interest therein, and all amendments thereto, all without 17

the necessity of Tenant's executing further instruments to effect such subordination; provided, however, that Tenant's rights hereunder shall not be disturbed, except in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Lease. If requested, Tenant shall execute and deliver to Landlord within ten (10) days after Landlord's request, whatever documentation that may reasonably be required to further effect the provisions of this Section 16.2.

16.3. Attornment. In the event of a foreclosure proceeding, the exercise of the power of sale under any mortgage or deed of trust or the termination of a ground lease, Tenant shall, if requested, attorn to the purchaser thereupon and recognize such purchaser as Landlord under this Lease. The transferee shall not be liable for any acts, omissions or defaults of Landlord that occurred before the sale or conveyance, or the return of any security deposit except for deposits actually paid to transferee, and except as reduced as expressly provided for in Section 3.4 of this Lease or by operation of Law.

17. RELOCATIONWAIVER.

17.1. Waiver. Tenant fully releases and discharges Landlord (in its capacity as Landlord and otherwise as a municipal corporation) from all and any manner of rights, demands, liabilities, obligations, claims, or cause of actions, in law or equity, of any kind or nature, known or unknown, now existing or hereinafter arising, which arise from or relate in any manner to the relocation of Tenant's business operations, or the relocation of any person(s ), business( es), or other occupant(s) located on within, on, or about, the Premises following the full or partial termination or expiration of Tenant's leasehold interest in the Premises (collectively, "Relocation Claims"), including waiver and release of any relocation rights under Government Code sections 7260 et seq. or any federal laws ("Relocation Assistance Law"). Tenant acknowledges and agrees that the release and waiver set forth in this Section 17 is material consideration for Landlord's amendment and consent to assignment of Lease, and that, but for this release and waiver, Landlord would not have entered into this Lease. By releasing and forever discharging the Relocation Claims, Tenant expressly waives any rights under California Civil Code section 1542, which provides: "A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH

THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS FAVOR AT THE

TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM MUST HA VE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR."

18. MISCELLANEOUS.

18.1. General.

18.1. l Entire Agreement. This Lease sets forth all the agreements between Landlord and Tenant concerning the Property and the Premises, and there are no agreements either oral or written other than as set forth herein.

18.1.2 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence of this Lease.

18.1.3 Attorneys' Fees. If any action is commenced which arises out of or related to this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party such sums as the court may adjudge to be reasonable attorneys' fees, expert fees, and expenses in the action, in addition to costs and expenses otherwise allowed by Law. In all other situations, 18

including any matter arising out of or relating to any bankruptcy or other voluntary or involuntary proceeding, in or out of court, for the adjustment of debtor-creditor relationships, Tenant agrees to pay all of Landlord's costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees and expert fees, which may be incurred in enforcing or protecting Landlord's rights or interests.

18.1.4 Severability. If any provision of this Lease or the application of any such provision shall be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable to any extent, the remaining provisions of this Lease and the application thereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall not be affected, impaired or invalidated.

18.1.5 Law. This Lease shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the Laws of the state of California, without reference to its choice of law provisions.

18.1.6 Intemretation. The titles to the sections ofthis Lease are not a part of this Lease and shall have no effect upon the construction or interpretation of any part of this Lease. As used in this Lease, masculine, feminine or neuter gender and the singular or plural number shall each be deemed to include the others where and when the context so dictates. The word "including" shall be construed as if followed by the words "without limitation." This Lease shall be interpreted as though prepared jointly by both parties.

18.1.7 No Option. Submission of this Lease to Tenant for examination or negotiation does not constitute an option to lease, offer to lease or a reservation of, or option for, the Premises; and this Lease shall become effective and binding only upon the execution and delivery hereof by Landlord and Tenant.

18.1.8 Successors and Assie:ns. This Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of Landlord and, subject to compliance with the terms of Section 15, Tenant.

18.1.9 third party benefit.

Third Partv Beneficiaries. Nothing herein is intended to create any

18.1.10 Memorandum of Lease; Title. Landlord may elect to have either this Lease or a short form memorandum hereof recorded pursuant to the requirements of California Government Code section 37393. Tenant shall cooperate with Landlord in executing and acknowledging any such memorandum oflease. Upon the expiration or other termination ofthis Lease, Tenant shall immediately execute and deliver to Landlord a quitclaim deed to the Premises and the Property, as required, in recordable form, designating Landlord as transferee or grantee. Tenant shall not do any act which shall in any way encumber the title of Landlord in and to the Property or any portion thereof.

18.1.11 Agency, Partnership or Joint Venture. Nothing contained herein nor any acts of the parties hereto shall be deemed or construed by the parties hereto, nor by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture by the parties hereto or any relationship other than the relationship of landlord and tenant.

18.1.12 Merger. The voluntary or other surrender of this Lease by Tenant or a mutual cancellation thereof or a termination by Landlord shall not work a merger and shall, at 19

the option of Landlord, terminate all or any existing subtenancies or may, at the option of Landlord, operate as an assignment to Landlord of any or all of such subtenancies.

18.2. filw. All signs and graphics of every kind visible in or from public view or corridors, or the exterior of the Premises, installed or caused to be installed by, for the benefit of, or at the request of Tenant ("Signs") shall be, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, and subject to Landlord's prior written approval and shall be subject to all applicable Laws. Tenant shall remove all such Signs prior to the termination ofthis Lease. Such installations and removals shall be made in such manner as to avoid injury or defacement of the Premises; and Tenant shall repair any injury or defacement, including discoloration caused by such installation or removal.

Tenant shall be responsible for all fees, costs and expenses associated with installation and removal of Signs. In the event any such fees, costs or expenses are incurred by Landlord (whether directly or indirectly), Landlord shall deliver to Tenant an invoice, with reasonable supporting documentation, and Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for those amounts within fifteen (15) days after receipt of such invoice.

18.3. Waiver. No waiver of any default or breach hereunder shall be implied from any omission to take action on account thereof, notwithstanding any custom and practice or course of dealing. No waiver by either party of any provision under this Lease shall be effective unless in writing and signed by such party. No waiver shall affect any default other than the default specified in the waiver and then such waiver shall be operative only for the time and to the extent therein stated. Waivers of any covenant shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same.

18.4. Limitation of Liabilitv. The obligations of Landlord under this Lease are not personal obligations of Landlord; and Tenant shall look solely to the Premises for satisfaction of any liability of Landlord and shall not look to other assets of Landlord nor seek recourse against the other assets of Landlord. Whenever Landlord transfers its interest, Landlord shall be automatically released from further performance under this Lease and from all further liabilities and expenses hereunder and the transferee of Landlord's interest shall assume all liabilities and obligations of Landlord hereunder from the date of such transfer.

18.5. Notices. All notices to be given hereunder shall be in writing and mailed postage prepaid by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or delivered by personal or courier delivery, or sent by facsimile (immediately followed by one of the preceding methods), to Landlord's address and Tenant's address set forth in Sections 1 and 2 of the Basic Lease Information, or to such other place as Landlord or Tenant may designate in a written notice given to the other party. Notices shall be deemed served upon the earlier of receipt or three (3) days after the date of mailing.

18.6. Brokerage Commission. Landlord and Tenant each represents that they have not been represented by any broker in connection with this Lease, and that no real estate broker's commission, finder's fee or other compensation (individually and collectively, "Commission") is due or payable. Tenant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Landlord from any claims or liability, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in connection with a claim by any person for a Commission based upon any statement, representation or agreement of Tenant. 20

18.7. Authorization. Each individual or entity executing this Lease on behalf of Tenant represents and warrants that he or she or it is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on behalf of Tenant and that such execution is binding upon Tenant.

18.8. Holding Over. If, with Landlord's express written consent, Tenant holds over the Premises or any part thereof after expiration or earlier termination of the Term, such holding over shall constitute a month-to-month tenancy on all the other terms and conditions of this Lease, except that Base Rent shall be equal to the Rent payable under this Lease for the last full month before the date of expiration or termination. This section shall not be construed as Landlord's permission for Tenant to hold over. Acceptance of Rent by Landlord following expiration or termination shall not constitute a renewal of this Lease or extension of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term, as the case may be, except as specifically set forth above. If Tenant remains in possession of the Premises after expiration or other termination of this Lease without Landlord's express written consent, Tenant's continued possession shall be on the basis of a tenancy at sufferance and Tenant shall pay as rent during the holdover period an amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the Rent payable under this Lease for the last full month before the date of expiration or termination. If Tenant fails to surrender the Premises upon expiration or other termination of this Lease, Tenant shall indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from and against all loss or liability resulting from or arising out of Tenant's failure to surrender the Premises, including, but not limited to, any amounts required to be paid to any tenant or prospective tenant who was to have occupied the Premises after the expiration or other termination of this Lease and any related attorneys' fees and brokerage commissions.

18.9. Surrender. Upon the expiration or other termination of this Lease or Tenant's right to possession of the Premises, Tenant will surrender the Premises, together with all keys, broom-swept clean and in good condition and repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted.

Conditions existing because of Tenant's failure to perform maintenance, repairs or replacements shall not be deemed "reasonable wear and tear."

18. l 0. Joint and Several. If Tenant consists of more than one person, the obligation of all such persons shall be joint and several.

18.11. Covenants and Conditions. Each provision to be performed by Tenant hereunder shall be deemed to be both a covenant and a condition. This Lease shall be construed as though the covenants between Landlord and Tenant are independent and not dependent. Tenant expressly waives the benefit of any statute to the contrary, and agrees that even if Landlord fails to perform its obligations under this Lease, Tenant shall not be entitled to make repairs or perform any acts at Landlord's expense, or to any setoff against Rent or other amounts owing under this Lease against Landlord.

18.12. Force Majeure. For purposes of this Lease, the term "Force Majeure" shall mean and include the following: any delay caused by any action, inaction, order, ruling, moratorium, regulation, statute, condition or other decision of any governmental agency having jurisdiction over any portion of the Property, over any construction anticipated to occur thereon or over any uses thereof, or by fire, flood, inclement weather, energy shortage, strikes, lockouts or other labor or industrial disturbance, civil disturbance, order of any government, court or regulatory body claiming jurisdiction or otherwise, governmental preemption or curtailment in connection 21

with a national emergency or in connection with any rule, order, guideline or regulation of any department or governmental agency, or by reason of the conditions of supply and demand which have been or are affected by a war or other emergency, acts of terrorism, act of public enemy, war, riot, sabotage, blockade, embargo, failure or inability to secure an adequate supply of water, electricity, fuel, materials, supplies or labor through ordinary sources by reason of shortages or priority, discovery of Hazardous Materials (as defined in paragraph 11.1 ), earthquake, or other natural disaster, or any cause whatsoever beyond the reasonable control (excluding financial inability) of the party whose performance is required, or any of its contractors or other representatives.

18.13. Financial Statements. Upon ten (10) days prior written request from Landlord (which Landlord may make at any time during the Term but no more often than once in any calendar year, unless Tenant is in default), Tenant shall deliver to Landlord a current financial statement of Tenant and any guarantor ofthis Lease. Such statements shall be prepared in accordance with generally acceptable accounting principles and certified as true in all material respects by Tenant (if Tenant is an individual) or by an authorized officer or general partner of Tenant (if Tenant is a corporation or partnership, respectively).

19. ADDENDUM.

19.1. Attached hereto is an addendum or addenda containing Section(s) 20 through 22, which constitute a part ofthis Lease.
[SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE]
22

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease as of the Effective Date.

TENANT:

Mare Island Brewing Co. LLC
By: __,_7M_~~-
Print Name: Kent Fortner
Title: Presid:1 I 1z Date: q I~ I
(CITY SEAL)
23 LANDLORD:

CITY OF VALLEJO,
a municipal corporatio
ED AS TO COJ)JTENT:

D , ar
Intenm Economic Development Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:
c=~~~
City Attorney

ADDENDUM TO LEASE
(Base Rent During Term Subject to CPI Increase)
S::e:y;r; I&
This Addendum is attached to and made part of that certain Lease dated~ __ , 2013, between City of Vallejo, a California municipal corporation, as Landlord, and Mare Island Brewing Co. LLC, as Tenant ("Lease"). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Addendum shall have the meaning given them in the Lease. The provisions of this Addendum shall prevail over any inconsistent or conflicting provisions of the Lease. 20 BASE RENT ADJUSTMENTS DURING TERM.

20.1 Adjustment. Base Rent shall be adjusted commencing on the first anniversary of the Commencement Date and on each subsequent anniversary of the Commencement Date during the Term, including any Extension Term (each, an "Adjustment Date"). On each Adjustment Date the Base Rent for the ensuing twelve (12) month period ("Adjustment Period") shall be an amount equal to the greater of (i) the Base Rent (including any prior Base Rent adjustments) in effect immediately prior to the commencement of the applicable Adjustment Period (without regard to any temporary abatement of Rent then or previously in effect pursuant to the provisions of this Lease) or (ii) the product obtained by multiplying the sum specified in item (i) by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Index, as defined below, published for the month nearest but prior to the commencement date of the applicable Adjustment Period, and the denominator of which is the Index published for the month nearest but prior to the commencement of the twelve (12) month period immediately preceding the applicable Adjustment Period, capped at 3 %.

20.2 Index. The term "Index" as used in this Lease means the Consumer Price Index published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department of Labor for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area. If the Index is revised, the parties agree that the Bureau of Labor Statistics will be the sole judge of the comparability of successive indexes, but if that agency fails to supply indexes that it deems comparable, or if no succeeding index is published, then Landlord shall determine an appropriate alternative published price index.
809390v!B 05137/0068
[SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE]
Addendum
I

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the Effective Date.

TENANT:

Mare Island Brewing Co. LLC
By: jtMt~
Print Name: Kent Fortner
Title: President I {I ~
Date: q 1'4
(ClTY SEAL)
809390vlB 05137/0068
·LANDLORD:

CITY OF VALLEJO,
a municipal corporation
B~~-ieIB.Keen
City Manager
Date: / 0 - £- tl.fJ ( j,
/ONTENT:

Interim Economic Development Director

APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS:
~~~fin Claudia Quintana
City Attorney
Addendum
2

CONSENT CALENDAR 8.G.

DATE: May 12, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Job, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A NEW SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE, PHASE 1, AND THE CONSTRUCTION

PLANS FOR THE FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS CREEK BRIDGE

AND ADMIRAL CALLAGHAN LANE & TURNER PARKWAY, VALLEJO CALIFORNIA

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution approving a new Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Fairview at Northgate, Phase 1, and the construction plans for the Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge and Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway, Vallejo, California.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
Public Works recommends approval of the Subdivision Improvement Agreement to allow the Developer to continue its work to complete the required public improvements and further recommends that the City Council approve the construction plans for the Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge, located on Admiral Callaghan Lane at the southern end of the proposed Costco development, just south of the Turner Parkway intersection, and the construction plans for Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway, Vallejo, California.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
On June 9, 2020, the City approved the vesting tentative map entitled “Vesting Tentative Map Fairview at Northgate, Vallejo, California”, dated September 2018 and revised April 2020 (TM17-002) (the “Vesting Tentative Map”), for the Subdivision and other land use entitlements (PD 17-007, UP 18-007, ZMA 17-001) applicable to said Subdivision and/or the land encompassed within the Subdivision. Conditions of approval for the Fairview at Northgate development project, Phase 1 (including the new Costco), require the Developer to construct frontage improvements along Admiral Callaghan Lane, including, among other improvements, widening Admiral Callaghan Lane and installing a new bridge across the Blue Rock Springs Creek at the southerly end of Admiral Callaghan Lane.

A new Subdivision Improvement Agreement will allow the Developer additional time to complete the improvements, including installation of the Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge.

The construction plans for the Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge in Vallejo, California, were prepared by RNR, Construction, Inc., a true copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Vallejo, have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The construction plans are being presented to the City Council for approval.

The construction plans for Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway, Vallejo, California, were prepared by Kier & Wright, dated May 2025, a true copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Vallejo, have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The construction plans are being presented to the City Council for approval.

Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A NEW SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE, PHASE 1, AND THE

CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE BLUE ROCK

SPRINGS CREEK BRIDGE AND ADMIRAL CALLAGHAN LANE & TURNER

PARKWAY, VALLEJO CALIFORNIA

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact on the General Fund. This project is funded solely by private development.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Vallejo City Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the Fairview at Northgate Project (SCH#2018102007) on June 9, 2020.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution Approving SIA and Construction Plans for Fairview at Northgate Phase 1_CAO Stamp

2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement_CAO Stamp

CONTACT
Brad Job, Public Works Director (707) 648-4433
[email protected]

RESOLUTION NO. 26-______

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO APPROVING A NEW SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE, PHASE 1,

AND THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE BLUE ROCK

SPRINGS CREEK BRIDGE

WHEREAS, on June 9, 2020, the City approved the vesting tentative map entitled “Vesting Tentative Map Fairview at Northgate, Vallejo, California”, dated September 2018 and revised April 2020 (TM17-002) (the “Vesting Tentative Map”), for the Subdivision and other land use entitlements (PD 17-007, UP 18-007, ZMA 17-001) applicable to said Subdivision and/or the land encompassed within the Subdivision (collectively referred to as the “Approvals”); and WHEREAS, said Approvals, City ordinances, and City policies require the Developer to enter into an agreement with City whereby Developer agrees to construct street, utility, and other public improvements including the Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge (“Improvements”) by the time specified in said agreement; and
WHEREAS, a new Subdivision Improvement Agreement by and between the City of Vallejo and Vallejo-Fairview Developers, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation, has been prepared for Council’s approval which provides Developer until May 13, 2028 to complete the Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Construction Plans for the Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge in Vallejo, California, consisting of 18 sheets prepared by RNR, Construction, Inc., a true copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Vallejo, have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer; and

WHEREAS, the Construction Plans for Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway, Vallejo, California, consisting of 30 sheets prepared by Kier & Wright, dated May 2025, a true copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Vallejo, have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Vallejo hereby approves the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Fairview at Northgate, Phase 1, which agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or their designee to execute the Agreement, with any modifications recommended by the City Attorney and the City Clerk to attest.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of Vallejo hereby approves the Construction Plans for the Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of Vallejo hereby approves the Construction Plans for Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway, Vallejo, California.

Adopted by the City Council of the City of Vallejo at the meeting held on May 12, 2026, with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
____________________________________

ANDREA SORCE, MAYOR

ATTEST: _____________________________________
DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 1 of 15

RECORDING REQUESTED BY:

City of Vallejo
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:

City Clerk
City of Vallejo
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590

A portion of APN: 010-490-010 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Gov. Code §27383

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
(FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE, PHASE 1)
This Subdivision Improvement Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of May 13, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between Vallejo-Fairview Developers, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation whose business address is: Lewis Management Corporation, 9216 Kiefer Boulevard, Suite 4, Sacramento, CA 95826, hereinafter referred to as “Subdivider” of that certain subdivision known as Fairview at Northgate Project (“Subdivision”), and the City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation and charter city, hereinafter referred to as "City."
Recitals
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2020, the City approved the vesting tentative map entitled “Vesting Tentative Map Fairview at Northgate, Vallejo, California”, dated September 2018 and revised April 2020 (TM17-002) (the “Vesting Tentative Map”), for the Subdivision and other land use entitlements (PD 17- 007, UP 18-007, ZMA 17-001) applicable to said Subdivision and/or the land encompassed within the Subdivision (collectively referred to as the “Approvals”); and WHEREAS, Subdivider, pursuant to the State of California Subdivision Map Act and all applicable ordinances of City, presented to City a bond in the amount that will cover the cost of design and construction of the Improvements (defined herein) to be constructed by Subdivider for Phase 1 of the above-mentioned Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, on March 28, 2023, Subdivider presented a Final Map of Fairview At Northgate- Phase 1 (“Final Map”) to City for approval; and
WHEREAS, Subdivider requested approval of said Final Map prior to construction and completion of such Improvements; and
WHEREAS, said Approvals, City ordinances, and City policies require Subdivider to enter into

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 2 of 15 an agreement with City whereby Subdivider agrees to have said Improvements completed by the time specified in said agreement; and
WHEREAS, City and Subdivider are parties to that certain Public Infrastructure Construction and Reimbursement Agreement dated November 10, 2021 (the “PICRA”) which concerns in part the construction of the Improvements. It is not the intent of City and Subdivider to amend the PICRA in this SIA.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows:

Agreement

1. Prior to the expiration of two years from the Effective Date, and subject to extension as provided herein, Subdivider will construct, to the City's satisfaction, all improvements as outlined and set forth on the vesting tentative map entitled "Vesting Tentative Map Fairview at Northgate, Vallejo, California," dated September 2018 and revised April 2020 (TM l 7-002)("Vesting Tentative Map"), for the Subdivision and other land use entitlements (PD 17-007,UP 18-007 and ZMA 17- 001) together with all Conditions of Approval applicable to Phase 1 of said Subdivision and/or the land encompassed within the Subdivision (collectively referred to as the "Approvals") and all other improvements required of the Subdivider to be constructed by said ordinances, the Approvals pertaining to Phase 1 of said Subdivision ("Improvements"). Said Approvals are incorporated herein by this reference. Said Improvements are identified in the Approvals, and in Exhibits A and B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and shall include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

Admiral Callaghan Lane Frontage (East Side) Improvements The Improvements along the Admiral Callaghan Lane frontage (east side) include:
• Widen the existing two-lane roadway to a four-lane roadway with a raised island fronting Parcels 1 and 2 (raised island width will range from 2 feet to 12 feet). • Construct turn lanes.
• Rehabilitate the southbound lanes by a grind and overlay pavement treatment. • Construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
• Construct a bridge over the existing creek at the southwest corner of the project site. • Install a traffic signal at the proposed Costco entrance. • Construct utility improvements including stubbing 12-inch diameter fire water connections to the adjacent commercial site, potable water and irrigation meter services, storm drain improvements along the proposed northbound lanes, a 24- inch diameter sanitary sewer stub to the commercial site to facilitate the future relocation of the Vallejo Flood & Wastewater District line.
• Install landscaping and irrigation.
• Install public streetlights.
• Relocate the existing overhead utility pole underground at the southwest corner of the project.
• Install landscaping and irrigation.
• Pay the pro-rata cost for the existing Rotary Way traffic signal.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 3 of 15 The Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway Improvements are shown in the plans prepared by Kier & Wright, dated May 2025, and stamped “Permit Set.” Turner Parkway Frontage (South Side) Improvements
The Improvements along the Turner Parkway Lane frontage (south side) include:
• Modify the existing traffic signal at Turner Parkway/ Admiral Callaghan Lane. • Along the Parcel 2 frontage:
o Widen the roadway.
o Reconstruct the curb, gutter, and sidewalk.
o Construct a meandering sidewalk.
o Install a bus turnout and concrete foundation for a future bus stop shelter to be installed by others.
o Install landscaping and irrigation.

The Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway Improvements are shown in the plans prepared by Kier & Wright, dated May 2025, and stamped “Permit Set.”

Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge Project, plans prepared by Cornerstone Structural Engineering Group, Inc., dated 1/7/2026, comprised of 17 Plan Sheets, to be constructed by RNR, Constructing Incorporated.

2. Said Improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the improvement plans described in Section 1 (sometimes “Plans” or “Plan”).

3. Said Improvements shall also be constructed in accordance with the current edition of the Caltrans Standard Specifications and Standard Plans, the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the City of Vallejo Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings dated December 20, 2011, and the Vallejo Municipal Code (the “Specifications”), as applicable. The foregoing Plans and Specifications are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.

4. Where there is a conflict between the Plans and Specifications described in paragraphs 2 and 3 herein, the more strict requirement shall govern.

5. Upon completion of the Improvements, and as conditions precedent to the acceptance of same and the release of security as provided hereinafter, the physical condition of the Subdivision shall be substantially identical with that depicted on the Vesting Tentative Map and all Approvals and Plans for the Improvements (except as to any other improvements approved by the City in writing).

At the request of Subdivider, City shall approve a one-year extension of the 2-year time period, provided the Subdivider is not otherwise in default hereunder. No additional extension of the total five years shall be made except (i) as provided in Section 18 for a Force Majeure Event or (ii) upon the basis of a written application made by Subdivider to the City stating fully the grounds of the application and facts relied upon for such an extension, and City shall retain full discretion to grant, grant in part, or deny the extension. Subdivider shall pay the City's costs of processing any extension in accordance with the City's cost recovery procedures, and any application for an extension may be conditioned upon an increase in security and inspection fees to reflect current

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 4 of 15 costs, as determined by the City Engineer. Whether any such extension is granted shall be left to the sole, unfettered discretion of the City. Neither such extension nor other delay by City shall constitute a waiver of any of the obligations of Subdivider or Subdivider's surety. Any application for an extension of the said five- (5-) year time period specified herein shall be delivered to the City at least sixty (60) days before the said time period expires (or as provided under Section 18 below for a Force Majeure extension), otherwise, the right to apply for such an extension shall be waived.

6. A. Subdivider shall, at Subdivider’s expense, obtain and maintain during the life of this Agreement all necessary permits, approvals, waivers and/or licenses for the construction and installation of the Improvements, give all necessary notices and pay all fees and taxes required by law.

B. Prior to and as a condition to the issuance of any grading, building or other permit by City for said Improvements, as a condition to the continued validity of any such permit and prior to the commencement of the Work (defined below), Subdivider shall have obtained and provided to the City evidence that it has obtained, all necessary approvals, licenses, permits, and/or waivers (“third party permits”) required for said Improvements from the California Department of Fish and Game, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District, and all other agencies with jurisdiction. Subdivider shall comply with said third party permits and their terms and conditions. If at any time any of Subdivider’s third party permits obtained from any other agency with jurisdiction lapses, expires, terminates, and/or is revoked and/or Subdivider is served with a notice of violation of any such third party permits by any such agency, the City shall have the right to revoke any grading, building or other permit it issued to Subdivider and halt any and all Work until the third party permits are reinstated or re-issued and/or the notice of violation is rescinded or canceled, as the case may be.

7. Subdivider warrants and guarantees that as of the date of this Agreement, except for any interests offered to and accepted by public agencies, it is the sole owner of the Subdivision and each and every lot, parcel or part thereof; provided that Costco is, or will be by the Effective Date of this Agreement, the owner of Parcel 1 of the Phase 1 Final Map (the “Costco Parcel”).

8. Subdivider hereby warrants that the Plans referred to herein are in accordance and conformity with the Approvals and all other plans for the Approvals previously approved by the City, together with all conditions made a part of said Approvals. Subdivider further warrants that said plans and specifications are adequate to accomplish the Improvement work (the “Work”) covered by this Agreement in good, workmanlike manner and in accordance with accepted construction practices.

Subdivider warrants and shall be solely responsible for ensuring that the design and construction of the Improvements and the Work will not adversely affect any portion of adjacent properties and that all Work will be performed in a proper manner and in accordance with all City-issued permits and third party permits and applicable laws and regulations. Subdivider may modify said Plans and specifications as the development of the Subdivision progresses should unforeseen conditions occur only upon the prior written approval from the City Engineer. Should said Plans and specifications, the Improvements and/or the Work at any time prior to the City’s final acceptance of the Improvements referred to herein prove, in the opinion of City, to be inadequate in any respect, then Subdivider shall make such changes in the plans and specifications, Improvements and/or Work as are necessary to satisfy City's requirements, all at no expense to City.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 5 of 15

9. The City’s Public Works Director shall inspect all of the Improvements to be accepted for maintenance by the City (hereinafter referred to as "Public Improvements"). All Improvements shall be inspected for compliance with this Agreement and City standards, the plans, the conditions of the Approvals, specifications, and development regulations.

10. A. Subdivider shall allow City's duly authorized representatives access to the Work at all times and shall furnish them with every reasonable facility for ascertaining that the methods, materials, and workmanship comply with the requirements and intent of the Improvement plans and this Agreement. Subdivider shall give at least ten days’ advance notice of the date upon which the Work is to commence and the date upon which the Work is to be completed. City may reject defective Work and require its repair, replacement, or removal by Subdivider, all at no expense to City. City will use its best efforts to provide timely notice of any defect about which it has actual knowledge, but City’s failure to provide such notice shall not constitute a waiver or affect any of City’s rights or remedies or provide a defense to Subdivider.

B. Upon final completion and acceptance of all said Work in accordance with this Agreement, the City Engineer, in accordance with City regulations, shall notify Subdivider in writing of his acknowledgment of acceptance of same. Except as otherwise provided herein, for a period of one year from and after the date of said acceptance of said Work, Subdivider shall guarantee and warrant all the Improvements constructed under the provisions of this Agreement against defective work or labor done or defective materials furnished and shall repair any defects or failures which may appear in the Improvements during said one year period and further correct the causes of said defects or failures. Neither the written acknowledgment of acceptance hereinabove referred to nor any periodic or progress inspection or approval shall waive any defect in the Improvements or any breach of this Agreement. Acceptance of any part of any stage of said improvement Work shall not be final until the written notice of final acceptance of all the Improvements shall have been delivered to Subdivider as required herein.

C. City shall not be required to exonerate any surety, release any security relating to satisfactory completion of the Improvements or issue occupancy permits until acceptance of Public Improvements by the City or, in the case of Improvements which will not be dedicated to and accepted by the City, until the Improvements have passed final inspection by the City. In addition, release of security, exoneration of sureties and issuance of occupancy permits will be predicated upon the receipt of required maintenance and/or warranty agreements and security therefor, in forms acceptable to the City.

D. No Improvements shall be accepted by the City unless and until they are free of all liens and encumbrances, and free of all material defects and conditions which may create a hazard to the public health, safety, or welfare. In addition, all properties, rights-of-way, easements, and other interests to be dedicated to the City shall be, before acceptance thereof by the City, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances of any kind or character whatsoever and free of any and all material defects and conditions creating a hazard to public health or public safety.

E. Subdivider shall acquire and dedicate all rights-of-way, easements, and other interests in real property for construction and installation of the Public Improvements or pay the cost of acquisition incurred by City. The Subdivider’s obligations with regard to acquisition by City of off-site rights-of-way, easements, and other interests in real property shall be subject to a separate

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 6 of 15 agreement between Subdivider and City. Subdivider shall also be responsible for obtaining any public or private sanitary sewer, drainage, and/or utility easements or authorizations to accommodate the Subdivision.

F. If any of the Public Improvements contemplated by this Agreement are to be constructed or installed on land not owned by City or Subdivider, no construction or installation of the Improvements or Work shall be commenced before:
(1) An offer of dedication is made to City of appropriate rights-of-way, easements, or other interests in real property, as determined by the City Engineer, and appropriate authorization from property owner(s) to allow construction or installation of the Improvements or Work are delivered to the City, or
(2) The appropriate rights-of-way, easements, or other interests in real property, as determined by the City Engineer, are dedicated and accepted by the City, or (3) A court of competent jurisdiction issues an order of possession pursuant to the State Eminent Domain Laws. Subdivider shall comply in all respects with the order of possession.

Nothing in this Section 10(F) shall be construed as authorizing or granting an extension of time to Subdivider.

11. Subdivider shall replace or repair, or have replaced or repaired, as the case may be, all Public Improvements, public utility facilities and surveying monuments which are destroyed or damaged as a result of any Work under this Agreement. Subdivider shall bear the entire cost of replacement or repairs of any and all public or public utility property damaged or destroyed by reason of any Work done under this Agreement, whether such property is owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political development thereof, or by the City or any public or private utility corporation or by any combination of such owners. Any repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of the City Engineer.

Furthermore, until such time as the Improvements are accepted by City, Subdivider shall be responsible for, and bear the risk of loss to, any and all of the Improvements constructed or installed excepting any loss resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City.

Until such time as all Improvements required by this Agreement are fully completed and accepted by City, Subdivider shall be solely responsible for the care, maintenance of, and any damage to such Improvements, and City shall not, nor shall any officer or employee thereof, be liable or responsible for any accident, loss or damage, regardless of cause, happening or occurring to the Work or Improvements excepting any loss or damage resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City. All such risks shall be the responsibility of and are hereby assumed by Subdivider. The Subdivider shall defend and indemnify the City for said accidents, losses, and/or damages pursuant to Section 29 below. As to any accident, loss or damage occurring or happening after all the Improvements are fully completed and accepted by the City, Subdivider shall indemnify and defend the City pursuant to Section 29 below.

12. All inspection services rendered in connection with the Work covered by this Agreement shall be paid for by Subdivider.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 7 of 15

13. Intentionally omitted.

14. If Subdivider refuses or fails to cause prosecution of the Work, or any severable part thereof, with such diligence as will ensure its completion within the time specified by this Agreement, or any extensions thereof, or fails to cause completion of said Work within such time; or if the Subdivider fails to timely cure any defects in the Improvements; or if the Subdivider should be adjudged bankrupt; or if Subdivider should make a general assignment for the benefit of Subdivider's creditors; or if a receiver should be appointed in the event of Subdivider's insolvency; or if Subdivider or any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees should violate or fail to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement; then such acts, omissions and/or events shall constitute a material breach of and default under this Agreement, and, unless such breach and default remains uncured after thirty (30) days written notice to Subdivider from the City, then City reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or in equity for such breach, including but not limited to serving written notice on Subdivider and Subdivider's surety of breach of this Agreement, or of any portion thereof, and of the default of Subdivider.

15. In the event of any such notice of breach of this Agreement and the failure of Subdivider to cure its default, any surety providing Performance Security described in Section 16, below, shall be liable to City for the cost of construction and installation of the Improvements and Work and for costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred in enforcing this Agreement. In such event, and at the City’s option, Subdivider’s surety shall have the duty to take over, commence (if applicable) and complete the Work and Improvements or otherwise perform as is herein specified; provided, however, that if the surety, within the time period specified in the City’s notice of breach, does not give City written notice of its intention to take over the performance of this Agreement, and does not commence performance thereof within five (5) days after notice to City of such election, City may elect to take over the Work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract with a new contractor or by any other method City may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of Subdivider and Subdivider’s surety. In such event, City may, without liability for so doing, take possession of and utilize in completing the Work such materials, appliances, plant and other property belonging to Subdivider as may be onsite of the Work and necessary therefor, and by execution of this Agreement, Subdivider grants City permission to enter onto the Subdivision in such event as may be necessary or convenient to construct such Improvements. Should City proceed to have the Work called for by this Agreement completed by entering into a contract with a new Contractor, City shall execute said contract for and on behalf of and as the agent of Subdivider. The City reserves to itself all remedies available to it at law or in equity for breach of Subdivider’s obligations under this Agreement. The City shall have the right, subject to this Section, to draw upon or utilize the appropriate security to mitigate the City’s damages in the event of default of Subdivider. The right of the City to draw upon or utilize the security is additional to and not in lieu of any other remedy available to City. It is specifically recognized that the estimated costs and security amounts may not reflect the actual cost of construction or installation of the Improvements and, therefore, City’s damages for Subdivider’s default shall, in part, be measured by the cost of completing the required Improvements. The sums provided by the Improvement security may be used by City for the completion of the Public Improvements in accordance with the Improvement plans and specifications contained herein. Subdivider and Subdivider's surety, and any person, partnership, entity, corporation, or association claiming any interest in the Subdivision and each of them, shall be liable to City for any costs, claims, damages, liability or expenses of whatever nature or kind,

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 8 of 15 direct or indirect, including interest at the maximum rate allowed by law from the date of notification of such cost and expense until paid, and reasonable attorneys’ fees, which are directly or indirectly incurred by reason of the enforcement of this Agreement. Such amounts and interest accrued thereon shall constitute a lien on the Subdivision. Subdivider acknowledges and agrees that if the Improvements are not completed to the satisfaction of the City within the time specified by this Agreement, or any extension thereof, Subdivider fails to comply with any requirement imposed as a condition of the Approvals, or Subdivider fails to comply with any condition imposed under a third party permit, City, in addition to any other remedy it may have at law or in equity or as otherwise provided in this Agreement, may withhold occupancy certificates, utility connections, building permits, zoning permits, and any other land use entitlement until the Improvements have been completed in accordance with this Agreement, and as to any such permit or land use entitlement, Subdivider waives any and all rights Subdivider may have under the California Permit Streamlining Act. Failure of Subdivider to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall constitute consent to the filing by the City of a notice of violation against all the lots in the Subdivision, or to rescind the Approvals or otherwise revert the Subdivision to acreage. The remedies provided by this Section are in addition to, and not in lieu of, other remedies available to the City. Subdivider agrees that the choice of remedy or remedies for Subdivider’s breach shall be in the discretion of City. In the event that Subdivider fails to perform any obligation hereunder, Subdivider agrees to pay all costs and expenses incurred by City in securing performance of such obligations, including but not limited to fees and charges of architects, engineers, attorneys, other professionals, and court costs. The failure of City to take enforcement action with respect to a default, or to declare a breach, shall not be construed as a waiver of that default or breach or any subsequent default or breach of Subdivider. In the event that Subdivider commences work on none of the Improvements required to be constructed under this Agreement within the time period set forth in Section 1 hereof, such failure shall constitute a breach of this Agreement and permit the City to recover from Subdivider’s surety and/or utilize the performance security to pay for the costs of commencing and completing the Improvements and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorney’s fees incurred in enforcing this Agreement.

16. Subdivider shall, upon execution of this Agreement, deposit with City cash in the sum of $7,099,164.60, or satisfactory improvement security as provided by all applicable ordinances of City, in said amount to secure faithful performance of this Agreement and every part thereof by Subdivider. Any additions, alterations, or modifications of this Agreement or to the plans and specifications referred to herein, including any extension of time within which the Work hereunder may be completed, shall not release, or exonerate any surety or sureties on the improvement security given in connection with this Agreement.

17. Subdivider shall, upon execution of this Agreement, deposit with City cash in the sum of $7,099,164.60, or a satisfactory improvement security as provided by all applicable ordinances of City, in said amount to guarantee payment to contractors, subcontractors and persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials for improvements covered by this Agreement and every part thereof by Subdivider. Any additions, alterations, or modifications to this Agreement or to the plans and specifications referred to herein, including any extension of time within which the Work hereunder may be completed, shall not release, or exonerate any surety or sureties on the improvement security given in connection with this Agreement.

18. Force Majeure Extension. In addition to specific provisions of this Agreement providing for

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 9 of 15 extensions of time, times for performance by Subdivider hereunder shall be extended where delays or defaults are due to war; insurrection; any form of labor dispute; lockouts; riots; floods; earthquakes; fires; acts of Goel or of third parties; third party litigation; acts of a public enemy; referenda; acts of governmental authorities (except that the failure of the City to act as required hereunder shall not excuse its performance); moratoria; epidemics; pandemics; quarantine restrictions; shortages of materials; freight embargoes; and any other matter beyond the reasonable control of Subdivider (each a "Force Majeure Event"), provided, however, that Subdivider shall notify City of the nature of the matter causing the delay within thirty (30) clays from the occurrence thereof; and, provided further, that the extension of time shall be only for the period of the delay caused by the Force Majeure Event. However, deadlines for performance may not be extended as provided above due to any inability of the Subdivider to obtain or maintain financing for the construction and/or operation of the Improvements.

19. Intentionally omitted.

20. A. The securities described in Sections 16 and 17 shall be of the type specified in Government Code Section 66499(a)(1), (2), or (3), and must be satisfactory to and be approved by the City Attorney as to form. The surety for each such security (herein "Surety") shall (i) be currently admitted to transact surety insurance by the California Department of Insurance, (ii) have a Best’s Insurance Guide rating (herein a "Rating") of no less than A-, when each such security is issued, and (iii) be approved by the City, with such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. Upon execution of this Agreement, or any change in Surety hereunder, Subdivider shall deliver to the City the certificate of the County Clerk attesting to the admittance status of the Surety. The City shall be the sole indemnitee named on any instrument required by this Agreement.

B. In the event a Surety's Rating is reduced below "B" ( a “Rating Event”), Subdivider shall have ten (10) business days from the date such rating actually drops below “B” to present the City with bonds issued by one or more Sureties other than the one being replaced, which shall meet the criteria specified above (the "Replacement Surety"), regardless of the date Subdivider or City actually becomes aware of the Rating Event. In the event the Subdivider does not deliver to the City the security of a Replacement Surety within the ten (10) business day period provided hereunder, Subdivider's Work under this Agreement shall immediately cease and shall not re- commence until Subdivider has delivered security issued by such Replacement Surety to the City.

C. In the event that the Subdivider does not maintain, in full force and effect, the securities specified in Sections 16 and 17 until the later of final acceptance of the Improvements or the time at which the City is required to release said securities, (a) Subdivider’s Work under this Agreement shall immediately cease and shall not re-commence until Subdivider has delivered to the City the requisite security, and (b) the City shall have the right to withhold certificates, permits and entitlements as provided in Section 15.

D. Certificates of deposit shall not be deemed to be satisfactory security unless such certificates provide that the City is the owner of record of such funds. In addition to the full amount of the security, there shall be included costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including attorney’s and expert’s fees incurred in enforcing the obligation secured.

21. Intentionally omitted.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 10 of 15

22. Without limiting Subdivider's indemnification provided hereinbelow, Subdivider shall take out and maintain at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance with insurers with a Best rating of no less than A:XI:

A. Workers' Compensation Insurance to cover its employees, and the Subdivider shall require all contractors and subcontractors similarly to provide Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California for all of the subcontractors' employees. Each Workers' Compensation policy shall be endorsed with the provision that it will not be canceled or altered without first giving thirty (30) days prior notice to the City.

In case any class of employees engaged in hazardous work under this Agreement is not protected under Workers' Compensation statutes, the Subdivider shall provide, and shall cause its contractors and subcontractors to provide, adequate and suitable insurance for the protection of its employees not otherwise protected. Such policy shall provide that it will not be canceled or altered without first giving thirty (30) days prior notice to the City.

Said Worker's Compensation policy shall have the following endorsement:
"All rights of subrogation are hereby waived against the City, its officers and employees when acting within the scope of their appointment or employment".

B. Commercial General Liability Insurance including personal injury and property damage insurance for all activities of the Subdivider and its contractors and subcontractors arising out of or in connection with this contract, written on a commercial general liability form including, but not limited to, Broad Form Property Damage, blanket contractual, products liability and completed operations, X,C,U hazards, vehicle coverage and non- owned auto liability coverage in an amount no less than $2 million dollars combined single limit personal injury and property damage for each occurrence.

Each such policy shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
(1) The City is named as additional insured for all liability arising out of the Work performed by or on behalf of the named insured, and this policy protects the additional insured, its officers, agents, and employees against liability for personal and bodily injuries, deaths or property damage or destruction arising in any respect, directly, or indirectly, in the performance of the contract.
(2) The inclusion of more than one insured shall not operate to impair the rights of one insured against another insured, and the coverages afforded shall apply as though separate policies had been issued to each insured.
(3) The insurance provided is primary and no insurance held or owned by the City shall be called upon to contribute to a loss.
(4) The coverage provided by this policy shall not be canceled without thirty (30) days prior written notice given to the City.

C. At the time of execution of this Agreement, Subdivider shall submit to City documentation

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 11 of 15 evidencing Subdivider’s required insurance including Certificates of Insurance signed by the insurance agent and companies named on the City’s form, copies of which are attached as Exhibit "A" and "B" and properly executed endorsements in the form attached as Exhibits "C" and "D" for the additional coverages required hereunder. Any deductible or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved in writing by City. At the option of City, insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductible or self-insured retention as respects City, its officers and employees or Subdivider shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigation, claims, administration, and defense expenses.

23. All notices herein required shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by overnight or registered mail, postage paid. Notice required to be given to City shall be addressed as follows:

Public Works Director
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590

With copy to:

Veronica Nebb
City Attorney
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo, CA 94590
Email: [email protected]

All notices required to be given to Subdivider shall be addressed as hereinbelow indicated:

Lewis Management Corp.

Attention: Doug Mull
9216 Keifer Blvd.

Sacramento, CA 95826
Telephone: (916) 363-2617
Email: [email protected]

Lewis Management Corp.

Attention: W. Bradford Francke, Esq.
1156 N Mountain Avenue
Upland, CA 91786
Telephone: (909) 946-7538
Email: [email protected]

All notices required to be given to surety or guarantor of Subdivider shall be addressed as indicated on the instrument of improvement security incorporated herein by reference.

Any party hereto or the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other parties and thereafter notice shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 12 of 15

24. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and every provision thereof; provided, that subject to Section 1, in the event good cause is shown therefor, City may extend the time for completion of the Improvements by Subdivider. Any such extension may be granted without notice to the Subdivider's surety, and extensions granted shall not relieve the surety's liability on the bond to secure the faithful performance of this Agreement. The City shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle Subdivider to an extension.

25. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by written agreement signed by both parties.

Failure on the part of either party to enforce any provisions of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to compel enforcement of such provision(s) and shall not act to release any surety from its obligations under this Agreement.

26. This Agreement shall not be assigned by Subdivider without the written consent of City. The consent of City to any assignment shall not be unreasonably withheld, provided the proposed assignee (“Successor”) can demonstrate its ability to perform and complete the obligations of Subdivider under this Agreement, as determined by objective standards of financial capability, creditworthiness and experience required for such performance. The City shall have the right to compel the Successor to disclose all documents, information, and other material which, in the City’s reasonable discretion, may establish or tend to establish that the proposed Successor meets the standards specified hereinabove. Subject to subparagraph (5) herein below, no assignment permitted hereunder shall be complete until substitute security is provided by the Successor to fulfill its obligations under Sections 16 through 21 hereof. Provided that by no later than six (6) months prior to the expiration of the period specified in Section 1 above, Subdivider provides the City at least forty-five (45) days advance written notice of Subdivider’s intent to assign this Agreement and delivers that notice as well as all documents, information and other material requested by the City and sufficient to enable the City to exercise the discretion vested in it pursuant to this Section 26. No later than thirty (30) calendar days after the City receives the materials submitted by the Subdivider, the City shall deliver to the Subdivider a written determination whether the submitted materials are complete. If the City’s written determination is not delivered within said thirty (30) day period, the submission shall be deemed complete. If within said thirty (30) day period, the City delivers a notice to the Subdivider that the submitted materials are incomplete, the Subdivider shall have thirty (30) calendar days to submit the necessary additional information and after timely submittal thereof, the City shall have thirty (30) calendar days within which to, again, deliver notice to the Subdivider whether the submitted materials are complete. If the Subdivider does not submit additional materials within thirty (30) calendar days after receiving the City’s determination of incompleteness, it shall be conclusively deemed that the Subdivider has withdrawn its request for consent to the assignment in question. Not later than forty-five (45) days after the Subdivider’s submittal is determined or deemed complete, the City shall accept or reject the proposed assignment. The existence of any legitimate dispute between City and Subdivider over the acceptance by City of any proposed Successor may, in City’s unfettered discretion, result in an extension of the time for performance of Subdivider’s obligations hereunder, as set forth in Section 1, equal to the amount of time required for resolution of such dispute. If the City consents to an assignment to any third-party Subdivider or Subdivider, this Agreement shall be deemed to have been amended to provide: (1) that Successor shall be acknowledged by City to be the Subdivider hereunder; (2) that Successor shall assume all obligations of Subdivider hereunder; (3) that all Work and Improvements to which this Agreement relates shall be completed by Successor as required hereunder; (4) that the security for performance

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 13 of 15 of Subdivider’s obligations hereunder, as provided in Sections 16 through 21 hereof, shall, at the election of Subdivider, consist of such security as the Successor shall post, subject to the City’s approval and as long as said substitute security complies with Sections 16 through 21; (5) that all cash security deposited with the City shall be retained by the City pursuant to the terms hereof and any balance owing to the Subdivider shall be paid to the Successor; and (6) Subdivider shall remain jointly and severally responsible with the Successor for all of the Subdivider’s obligations hereunder; and (7) the Successor shall provide evidence that it has obtained the requisite insurance.

27. In the event either party hereto shall commence any legal action or proceeding against the other party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the party prevailing in said action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover, in addition to its cost of suit, reasonable attorneys' fees to be fixed by the court, and such recovery shall include costs of suit and attorneys' fees on appeal, if any. This provision shall be in addition to any provisions regarding attorney’s fees set forth in the bonds securing this Agreement.

28. Prior to the acceptance of any dedications or improvements by City, Subdivider shall certify and warrant that: (1) neither the property to be dedicated nor Subdivider are in violation of any environmental law and neither the property to be dedicated nor the Subdivider are subject to any existing, pending or threatened investigation by any federal, state or local governmental authority under or in connection with environmental law. Neither Subdivider nor any third party will use, generate, manufacture, produce, or release, on, under, or about the property to be dedicated, any hazardous substance except in compliance with all applicable environmental laws; (2) Subdivider has not caused or permitted the release of, and has no knowledge of the release or presence of, any hazardous substance on the property to be dedicated or the migration of any hazardous substance from or to any other property adjacent to, or in the vicinity of, the property to be dedicated; and (3) Subdivider’s prior and present use of the property to be dedicated has not resulted in the release of any hazardous substance on the property to be dedicated. Subdivider shall give prompt written notice to City at the address set forth herein of:

A. Any proceeding or investigation by any federal, state, or local governmental authority with respect to the presence of any hazardous substance on the property to be dedicated or the migration thereof from or to any other property adjacent to, or in the vicinity of, the property to be dedicated;
B. Any claims made or threatened by any third party against City or the property to be dedicated relating to any loss or injury resulting from any hazardous substance; and C. Subdivider’s discovery of any occurrence or condition on any property adjoining or in the vicinity of the property to be dedicated that could cause the property to be dedicated or any part thereof to be subject to any restrictions on its ownership, occupancy, use for the purpose for which it is intended, transferability or suit under any environmental law.

29. City shall not be responsible for any of the Work, any Improvement or for performance or nonperformance of any work of construction of any Improvement. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Subdivider, and each of its members, hereby agrees to, and shall defend, indemnify and hold City, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, or committees, and their respective officers, officials, appointees, agents, and employees (collectively, “City Indemnitees”) harmless

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 14 of 15 from and against any and all allegations, claims, damages, disabilities, or expenses, including attorneys’ fees, experts’ fees, and witness costs that may be asserted or incurred, as the case may be, by any person or entity, including liability for damages or claims for damage for personal injury, or death, as well as from claims for real or personal property damage arising out of or in connection with (i) the activities of Subdivider in performing any Work on any Improvement addressed in this Agreement, (ii) Subdivider’s performance or non-performance under this Agreement, (iii) Subdivider’s breach of this Agreement, (iv) the City’s approval of this Agreement (except for any claims Subdivider may have against the City for City’s breach of this Agreement), (v) the City’s compliance or non-compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act or any other law applicable to the approval, processing and implementation of the Subdivision, the Approvals, this Agreement, the Improvements and/or Work, (vi) any soils subsidence, landslides or soil movement arising out of Subdivider’s activities hereunder; (vii) Subdivider’s handling, releasing, disposing, transporting or arranging for the handling, releasing, disposing or transporting of any hazardous wastes, substances or materials as those terms may be defined by any law, ordinance and/or regulation of any regulatory agency with jurisdiction; and/or (viii) Subdivider’s violation of any law, ordinance or regulation, whether or not there is concurrent, passive negligence on the part of City Indemnitees, and regardless of the City’s approval of the Plans or City’s inspection, approval or acceptance of the Improvements and notwithstanding any limitation on the amount or type of damages or compensation payable by or for Subdivider under Workers’ Compensation, Disability, or other employee benefit acts, the acceptance of insurance certificates required under this Agreement, or the terms, applicability, or limitations of any insurance held by Subdivider (collectively the “Claims”). City shall retain the right to: (i) choose and approve the counsel to so defend the City; (ii) approve all significant decisions concerning the manner in which the defense is conducted; and (iii) approve any and all settlements. City shall also have the right not to participate in the defense, except that City agrees to cooperate with the Subdivider in the defense of the proceeding. If City chooses to have counsel of its own defend any proceeding where the Subdivider has already retained counsel to defend the City in such matters, the fees and expenses of the counsel selected by the City shall be paid by the City. Subdivider indemnifies the City for any liability, cost, expense, including attorney’s fees, incurred by the City in enforcing this Section 29. This Section 29 shall not apply to any claims to the extent resulting from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City or any other City Indemnitees. This Section 29 shall survive termination of this Agreement for any reason.

30. Subdivider shall have sole responsibility for making all arrangements and assuming all expenses that may be required to provide the Subdivision with utilities. All utilities, including cable television facilities, shall be installed underground. All utilities to be located in streets shall be installed and approved prior to installing street improvements. Subdivider shall be solely responsible and assume all liability for any delays, or damages arising therefrom, caused by utility companies in relocating, installing, establishing, and/or constructing utility lines, cables, trenches, and/or facilities of any type. Subdivider shall release, defend, indemnify, and hold City harmless from any such liability, irrespective of City’s active or passive negligence.

31. All utilities to be located in streets shall be installed and approved prior to installing street improvements.

32. Intentionally omitted.

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) Page 15 of 15

33. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties’ successors, heirs and assigns, and by the recordation hereof (or the recordation of a memorandum hereof subject to the City’s approval) (which said recordation shall be effected by the City), it is the intention of the parties to give notice to and bind their successors, heirs and assigns hereto. The parties intend that this Agreement and its terms and conditions shall run with the land and shall be deemed a covenant running with the land and an equitable servitude. This Section 33 shall survive termination of this Agreement for any reason.

34. Jurisdiction and venue of all disputes over this Agreement and/or its terms shall be in the County of Solano, State of California.

35. The recitals are incorporated by reference.

[Signatures on the following page]

Subdivision Improvement Agreement (Fairview at Northgate – Phase 1) (Signature Page) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year shown below the name of each of the parties.

SUBDIVIDER:

VALLEJO-FAIRVIEW DEVELOPERS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company

By: LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP.
a Delaware corporation- Its Manager

By:

Doug Mull
Authorized Agent

DATE: __________________

(City Seal)

CITY OF VALLEJO,
a municipal corporation

By:

Gillian Haen
Acting City Manager

DATE:

By:

Nalungo Conley
Acting City Manager

DATE:

ATTEST:

By:

Dawn G Abrahamson
City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

By:

Veronica A. F. Nebb
City Attorney

APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE:

By:

Armond Sarkis
Risk Manager

NOTE: If the Subdivider executing this Agreement is a corporation, a certified copy of the bylaws or resolution of the board of directors authorizing said corporation to execute this Agreement shall be provided; and at least two corporate officers must execute this Agreement.

State of )
)
County of )

On , before me, ,
a Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the document.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of )
)
County of )

On , before me, ,
a Notary Public, personally appeared , who
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the document.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

PAYMENT (LABOR AND MATERIALS) BOND
for

CITY OF VALLEJO

FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS CREEK BRIDGE PROJECT

AND ADMIRAL CALLAGHAN LANE & TURNER PARKWAY VALLEJO,

CALIFORNIA IMPROVEMENTS

KNOW ALL MEN/WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, WHEREAS, that the City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation of the State of California, acting through its City Council, has Approved: _________________________, hereinafter designated as the Principal, a contract for:

Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge Project, plans prepared by Cornerstone Structural Engineering Group, Inc, dated 1/7/2026, comprised of 17 Plan Sheets, to be constructed by RNR, Constructing Incorporated.

Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway Vallejo, California, plans prepared by Kier & Wright, dated May 2025, comprised of 30 Plan Sheets, and stamped “Permit Set.”

AND WHEREAS, said Principal is required to furnish a bond in connection with said contract, provided that if said Contractor, or any of his/her or its subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies, or teams, used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or any work or labor done thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such labor, the Surety of this bond will pay the same.

NOW, THEREFORE, we, the Principal, and _____________________, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called City, in the sum of Seven Million Ninety-Nine Thousand One Hundred and Sixty-Four Dollars and Sixty Cents ($7,099,164.60), and no more, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents, as herein provided.

The condition of this obligation is such that, if said Principal, or his/her or its Subcontractors, shall fail to pay for any materials, provisions, provender or other supplies or teams used in, upon, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be done, or for any work or labor thereon of any kind, or for amounts due under the Unemployment Insurance Code with respect to such work or labor, as required by the provisions of California Civil Code, commencing with Section 9550, and providing that the persons, companies or corporations so furnishing said materials, provisions, or other supplies, appliances or power used in, for or about the performance of the work contracted to be executed or performed, or any person, company, or corporation, renting, or hiring implements, or machinery, or power, for, or contributing to said work to be done, or any person who performs work or labor upon the same, or any person who supplies both work and materials therefor, shall have complied with the provisions of said Title 15, the Surety hereon will pay the same in an amount not exceeding the sum specified in its bond, and

also, in case suit is brought upon this bond, reasonable attorneys’ fees to be fixed by the Court, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and virtue.

This bond shall inure to the benefit of any and all persons, companies and corporations entitled to file claims under Section 9100 of the Civil Code of the State of California so as to give a right of action to them or their assigns in any suit brought upon this bond.

The Surety herein, for value received, hereby stipulates, and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, addition or modification to the terms and conditions of said contract, or the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any manner affect its obligation on this bond, and said Surety does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration, or addition.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bounded parties have executed this Instrument under their several seals this ________ day of _____________________, 20_______. The name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed, and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative pursuant to authority of its governing body.

PRINCIPAL SURETY

SURETY INFORMATION:

Contact Person:__________________________________________

Name of
Company:_____________________________________________________

Adress: _____________________________________________________

Telephone: ___________________________________________

NOTE: (1) Signatures of those executing for the Surety must be properly acknowledged.
(2) This Bond must be in an amount equal to 100% of the amount bid.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Veronica A. F. Nebb City Attorney

State of )
)
County of )

On , before me, ,
a Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the document.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND
for

CITY OF VALLEJO

FAIRVIEW AT NORTHGATE BLUE ROCK SPRINGS CREEK BRIDGE

PROJECT AND ADMIRAL CALLAGHAN LANE & TURNER PARKWAY

VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA IMPROVEMENTS

KNOW ALL MEN/WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, WHEREAS,
________________________, as Principal, and ____________________________, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto the City of Vallejo, a municipal corporation of the State of California, hereinafter called the City, in the sum of Seven Million Ninety-Nine Thousand One Hundred Sixty-Four Dollars and Sixty Cents ($7,099,164.60), and no more, for the work described below, for the payments of which sum in lawful money of the United States of America well and truly to be made to the City of Vallejo, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents as herein above provided.

WHEREAS, that the Principal has entered into a contract with said City for the construction of:

Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge Project, plans prepared by Cornerstone Structural Engineering Group, Inc, dated 1/7/2026, comprised of 17 Plan Sheets, to be constructed by RNR, Constructing Incorporated.

Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway Vallejo, California, plans prepared by Kier & Wright, dated May 2025, comprised of 30 Plan Sheets, and stamped “Permit Set.”

NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of this obligation is such that if the above bounded Principal shall in all things stand to abide by, and well and truly keep and perform the covenants, conditions and agreements in the foregoing contract agreed on his/her or their part to be kept and performed at the time and in the manner herein specified, and shall indemnify and save harmless the City of Vallejo, its officers, agents and employees as therein stipulated, then this obligation shall become null and void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and virtue to guarantee Contractor’s faithful performance of its obligations in the Contract Documents, and Principal and Surety, in the event suit is brought on this bond, will pay to the Obligee such reasonable attorneys' fees as may be fixed by the Court.

The Surety herein, for value received, hereby stipulates, and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, addition or modification to the terms and conditions of said contract, or the specifications accompanying the same shall in any manner affect its obligations on this bond and said Surety does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension, alteration or addition. Said Surety hereby waives the provisions of Section 2819 and 2845 of the Civil Code of the State of California.

(Signatures on the following page)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above bounded parties have executed this Instrument under their several seals this day of , 20 .

The name and corporate seal of each corporate party being hereto affixed, and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative pursuant to authority of its governing body.

PRINCIPAL SURETY

SURETY INFORMATION:

Contact Person:________________________________________________

Name of
Company:_____________________________________________________

Address: _____________________________________________________

Telephone No.: ____________________________
NOTE: (1) Signatures of those executing for the Principal and Surety must be properly acknowledged.

(2) This Bond must be in an amount equal to 100% of the amount bid.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Veronica A. F. Nebb
City Attorney

State of )
)
County of )

On , before me, ,
a Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the document.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature (Seal)
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

EXHIBIT A
PW24-00374 Plans for Fairview at Northgate Blue Rock Springs Creek Bridge Project, dated 1/7/2026, and prepared by RNR, Construction, Inc.

EXHIBIT B
Construction Plans for Admiral Callaghan Lane & Turner Parkway Vallejo, California

CONSENT CALENDAR 8.H.

DATE: May 12, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Jason Ackley, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING UP-TO $50,000 FOR EMERGENCY ANIMAL

CONTROL VETERINARY COSTS

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution authorizing a not-to-exceed amount of $50,000 for emergency veterinary services paid to Solano County.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
The agreement between the City of Vallejo and Solano County for animal control services stipulates that Vallejo will reimburse Solano County for emergency medical treatment for animals that costs less than $400 per instance. As of April 16th, those invoices total nearly $22,000 in emergency medical veterinary charges.

City staff require Council approved authority to pay those invoices, as they are in addition to the normal contractual amount originally approved by City Council.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The City's agreement with the Solano County Sheriff's Office for animal control services, in effect from July 1, 2025, through June 30, 2028, contains the following language regarding emergency veterinary care for Vallejo animals:

The Sheriff’s Animal Control Officers will request approval from Customer for any emergency medical treatment exceeding $400.00, Customer expressly approves all cost $400.00 and below. Customer shall reimburse the Sheriff’s Office for all costs associated with the emergency medical visit.

As of April 16th, 2026, the City has received invoices totaling approximately $22,000 for emergency veterinary costs for Vallejo animals. The FY2026-2027 City Manager's Office budget has the funds budgeted to pay the invoices but does not have the authority to expend those dollars. Staff are thereby requesting Council authorization to expend up to $50,000 in total for the 2026-2027 Fiscal Year on these emergency veterinary costs for Vallejo animals.

FISCAL IMPACT
No additional funding is requested in this item - the City Manager's Budget has the funding budgeted for these costs. As authorization was not requested previously, Council approval and authorization is required to expend these funds.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably

Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING UP-TO $50,000 FOR EMERGENCY ANIMAL

CONTROL VETERINARY COSTS

foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution_50k_animalVet

CONTACT
Jason Ackley, Assistant to the City Manager (707) 648-4577 [email protected]

RESOLUTION NO. 26-______

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO AUTHORIZING UP TO $50,000 IN EMERGENCY VETERINARY COSTS PAYABLE TO SOLANO COUNTY

WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City of Vallejo has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement for Solano County Sheriff’s Office of Animal Control to provide Animal Control services within the City of Vallejo; and

WHEREAS, that agreement states that the City will pay for any emergency medical treatments for Vallejo animals with a cost of up to $400; and

WHEREAS, monies in the Fiscal Year 2025-2026 budget was set aside for these costs within the City Manager’s Office budget; and

WHEREAS, staff is requesting authorization for the City to expend a not-to-exceed amount of $50,000 for emergency veterinary costs through Solano County.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the expenditure of a not-to-exceed amount of $50,000 for emergency medical costs incurred during animal control operations by Solano County Sheriff’s Office of Animal Control.

ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO at a regular meeting held on _________, 2026, with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN

ATTEST

ANDREA SORCE, MAYOR

DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

CONSENT CALENDAR 8.I.

DATE: May 12, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Nalungo Conley, Acting City Manager
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO

APPROVING A THREE-YEAR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO, JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND

SOLANO COUNTY, BENICIA, FAIRFIELD, RIO VISTA, SUISUN CITY, VACAVILLE, AND

VALLEJO TO PARTIALLY FUND THE COORDINATED ENTRY SYSTEM ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS FROM DECEMBER 1, 2025 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2028 AND

AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a resolution of the City Council of the City of Vallejo approving a three-year memorandum of understanding between Community Action Partnership Solano, Joint Powers Authority and Solano County, Benicia, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun City, Vacaville and Callejo to partially fund the Coordinated Entry System addressing homelessness from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2028.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
The City Council is being asked to approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) by and between the Community Action Partnership of Solano, Joint Powers Authority (CAP Solano JPA), Solano County, and the Cities of Benicia, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun City, Vallejo, and Vacaville to support the coordinated entry system addressing homelessness from December 1, 2025 through December 31, 2028.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
A Coordinated Entry System (CES) is a community-wide system to standardize and expedite the process by which people experiencing homelessness, or who are at risk of homelessness, access housing and homeless resources. It connects the community's network of homeless services and housing resources while streamlining, standardizing and coordinating the homeless intake, assessment, and referral processes.

Through Coordinated Entry, people experiencing homelessness are matched to services and housing based on their level of vulnerability, need, and preferences. Standardizing the intake process across the CoC, sharing information in real-time, and adopting uniform prioritization policies are all at the core of a high- performing CES.

In Solano County, Community Action Partnership Solano, Joint Powers Authority (CAP Solano JPA) is the Administrative Entity for the Continuum of Care (CoC) and as such is required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to operate a Coordinated Entry System (CES). The CES is a process developed to ensure that all people experiencing homelessness have fair and equal access to available housing and are quickly identified, assessed for, referred to, and connected to housing and assistance based on their strengths and needs. The CES operator is selected through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process.

In 2017, HUD established requirements for such a coordinated assessment system for all CoCs and recipients of CoC and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) funding. Each CoC, including the local Housing First Solano, had to implement HUD requirements by January 2018 in order to receive continued funding, HUD provides limited funding for the CES, but does not cover the full cost of the mandated services. Since 2019 Benicia,

Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO

APPROVING A THREE-YEAR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO, JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

AND SOLANO COUNTY, BENICIA, FAIRFIELD, RIO VISTA, SUISUN CITY,

VACAVILLE, AND VALLEJO TO PARTIALLY FUND THE COORDINATED ENTRY SYSTEM ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS FROM DECEMBER 1, 2025 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2028 AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME

Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun, Vacaville and Vallejo and the County have agreed to provide funding to supplement federal funding for the annual cost of the agreement with the operator. The most recent funding agreement with the jurisdictions expired on May 31, 2025. This item brings forward a new MOU to continue to fund the CES at the same rate as previously funded.

CAP Solano JPA, as the Community Action Agency for Solano County, the collaborative applicant for Continuum of Care funding, and the Homeless Management Information System Lead Agency, is responsible for ensuring implementation of coordinated entry in Solano County. The coordinated entry operator, Caminar, was selected through a Request for Proposal process in 2017. The Solano Family Justice Center serves as the Coordinated Entry provider for survivors of domestic violence.

The CAP Solano JPA Board consists of one member and one alternate from the County and each seven cities, appointed by their respective Board or Council.

According to the CAP Solano JPA 2024 Annual Report, Resource Connect Solano reported a total of 1022 individuals and households had Coordinated Entry intakes completed during their reporting year. This is nearly double the total of prior year total of 591. Unhoused individuals accessed Resource Connect Solano (RCS) by phone, in person, or by email. RCS received 17,603 phone calls from individuals and families, 1,654 individuals and families came in person to physical access sites in Fairfield and Vallejo, and 1,594 individuals and families emailed looking for help and resources.

There were 137 exits with the following recorded positive outcomes, a 10% increase from the prior year. (Note: not all clients have exit outcomes recorded. Clients may secure housing through a variety of means and may not report back to RCS when they obtain housing.):
• Rental by client, with ongoing subsidy: 78%
• Rental by client, no ongoing subsidy: 19%
• Permanent housing with family/friend: 11%

During the reporting year, RCS referred 475 households to services and housing projects that participate in the Coordinated Entry System.

The County and several cities have reported that they have included funding to continue their support for Coordinated Entry in their FY2025/26 budgets. The proposed payment amount is determined by the population of the Cities with the County making a larger amount than its population and is in accordance with the payment structure of the previous MOU. The City of Dixon is not a participate in this Coordinated Entry MOU and is not included in the cost distribution, although people experiencing homelessness in Dixon are not excluded from receiving services through the coordinated entry system.

Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO

APPROVING A THREE-YEAR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO, JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

AND SOLANO COUNTY, BENICIA, FAIRFIELD, RIO VISTA, SUISUN CITY,

VACAVILLE, AND VALLEJO TO PARTIALLY FUND THE COORDINATED ENTRY SYSTEM ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS FROM DECEMBER 1, 2025 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2028 AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME

The JPA staff will ensure that the Coordinated Entry Services Operator:

1. Will be responsible managing for the implementation and on-going administration, development, and continuous improvement of Solano County’s Coordinated Entry System in alignment with Housing First Solano’s Coordinated Entry System Policies and Procedures.

2. Administers System support to the Coordinated Entry staff as well as the various jurisdictional and non-profit outreach teams.

3. Provides housing readiness services and case management.

4. Has resources made available through this MOU for operations are allocated to items such as: the costs of office space; maintenance; office equipment; Internet access; a system website; marketing; office supplies; transportation costs incurred by the Resource Connect Solano staff; public transportation costs for consumers; and essential training and conference attendance about Coordinated Entry.

FISCAL IMPACT
HUD provides funding through an agreement with the CAP Solano JPA, on behalf of the CoC, that funds approximately $233,589 annually of the CES operator contract. In addition, the CAP Solano JPA has secured funding from Partnership Health Plan of approximately $129,500 annually to enhance CES.

However, additional funds are still needed to ensure a fully functional CES.

The City of Vallejo's total share consists of $248,402 to be paid over a three-year term of December 1, 2025- December 31, 2028.

First year Funding Source: Professional Services / Homelessness

The first-year cost of $80,366 has already been included in the Professional Services / Homelessness fiscal year 2025-2026 approved budget. Staff are proposing that years two and three ($82,777 and $85,260 respectively) come from Measure P Funding and will be requested during future year budget processes.

2026 2027 2028 Total

Solano County $81,966 $84,425 $86,958 $253,350
Benicia $18,816 $19,381 $19,962 $58,158
Fairfield $77,564 $79,891 $82,288 $239,743
Rio Vista $6,127 $6,311 $6,501 $18,939
Suisun City $19,903 $20,500 $21,115 $61,517
Vacaville $66,895 $68,902 $70,969 $206,767
Vallejo $80,366 $82,777 $85,260 $248,402
Total $351,638 $362,187 $373,053 $1,086,878

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) because it is not a project

Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO

APPROVING A THREE-YEAR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO, JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY

AND SOLANO COUNTY, BENICIA, FAIRFIELD, RIO VISTA, SUISUN CITY,

VACAVILLE, AND VALLEJO TO PARTIALLY FUND THE COORDINATED ENTRY SYSTEM ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS FROM DECEMBER 1, 2025 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2028 AND AUTHORIZE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME

which has a potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, pursuant to CEQA Guideline section 15378.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Coordinated Entry MOU Resolution CAO Stamp

2. DRAFT REVISED CITIES/COUNTY COORD Entry MOU

3. Memo to Vallejo re Cities and County CES MOU

CONTACT
Natalie Peterson, Assistant to the City Manager
[email protected]

RESOLUTION NO. ________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO APPROVING A THREE-YEAR

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO,

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY AND SOLANO COUNTY, BENICIA, FAIRFIELD, RIO VISTA, SUISUN

CITY, VACAVILLE, AND VALLEJO TO PARTIALLY FUND THE COORDINATED ENTRY SYSTEM ADDRESSING HOMELESSNESS FROM DECEMBER 1, 2025 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2028

WHEREAS, a Coordinated Entry System (CES) is a community-wide system to standardize and expedite the process by which people experiencing homelessness, or who are at risk of homelessness, access housing and homeless resources; and

WHEREAS, in Solano County, the Community Action Partnership Solano, Joint Powers Authority is the Administrative Entity for the Continuum of Care and as such is required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to operate a CES; and

WHEREAS, HUD provides limited funding for the CES, but does not cover the full cost of the mandated service; and

WHEREAS, in 2019 the Cities of Benicia, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun, Vacaville and Vallejo and Solano County agreed to provide funding to supplement federal funding for the annual cost of the agreement with the CES operator; and

WHEREAS, the most recent funding agreement with the jurisdictions expired on May 31, 2025; and

WHEREAS, the City desires to continue to support the Coordinated Entry System;

WHEREAS, the revised MOU (Exhibit A) has been reviewed by staff and a clarifying memorandum dated March 30, 2026 has been provided by CAP Solano JPA staff to address questions raised by Vallejo staff (Exhibit B)

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Vallejo hereby approves the Memorandum of Understanding between Community Action Partnership, Joint Powers Authority and Solano County, Benicia, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun City, Vacaville, and Vallejo as set forth in Exhibit A and clarified in Exhibit B, attached hereto.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Manager or their designee is authorized to execute and implement the Memorandum of Understanding.

Adopted by the Council of the City of Vallejo on May 12, 2026 with the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
_________________________________________

ANDREA SOURCE, MAYOR

ATTEST: _________________________________________
DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 1 A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN

THE COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO,
JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY; SOLANO COUNTY; AND

THE CITIES OF BENICIA, FAIRFIELD, RIO VISTA,

SUISUN CITY, VACAVILLE, AND VALLEJO

REGARDING THE HOUSING FIRST SOLANO

CONTINUUM OF CARE COORDINATED ENTRY
SYSTEM

This Memorandum of Understanding, hereinafter referred to as “MOU,” is made effective December 1, 2025 by and between the Community Action Partnership Solano, Joint Powers Authority, hereinafter referred to as the “JPA”; Solano County, hereinafter referred to as the “County”; and the Cities of Benicia, Fairfield, Rio Vista, Suisun City, Vacaville, and Vallejo, hereinafter referred to as the “Cities”; individually, a “Party”; and collectively, the “Parties.”

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the JPA is charged with providing oversight and coordination of homeless and safety net services to the residents of the County and Cities; serving as the conduit for safety net funding support; administering such funds and making grants available to other non-profit entities that provide services to people experiencing homelessness; and undertaking such other programs as its Board of Directors may authorize, including such duties and tasks required to receive and distribute federal, state, local, and other funding to support the JPA’s mission; and

WHEREAS, the Continuum of Care that coordinates the provision of housing and supportive services addressing homelessness in the County and Cities is known as the Housing First Solano Continuum of Care, hereinafter referred to as the “CoC”; and

WHEREAS, in March 2017, the JPA released “Neighbors Helping Neighbors: Forward Together,” a regional strategic plan to respond to homelessness in Solano County as amended from time to time, hereinafter referred to as the “Regional Strategic Plan.”; and

WHEREAS, Coordinated Entry provides a standardized approach to comprehensively assess the housing and service needs of homeless individuals and families and refer them to appropriate available resources that are needed to end their homelessness; and

WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires recipients of Continuum of Care and Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Program

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 2 funding to use a coordinated assessment system, under the authority of the Continuum of Care Program Interim Rule, 24 CFR § 578; the Emergency Solution Grant Program Interim Rule, 24 CFR § 576; and HUD Notice CPD-17-01; and

WHEREAS, the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development requires recipients of Homeless Housing, Assistance and Prevention Program funding to use a coordinated entry system under the authority of Welfare and Institutions Code 8256(iii)(IV); and

WHEREAS, Coordinated Entry connects the community’s network of homeless services and housing resources while streamlining, standardizing, and coordinating the current homeless intake, assessment, and referral process; and

WHEREAS, homeless individuals and families, especially highly vulnerable individuals and families who are homeless, are Coordinated Entry’s principal users; and

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed that an effective Coordinated Entry process is a critical component to improving system navigation as recommended by the Regional Strategic Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Coordinated Entry System is governed by Housing First Solano’s Coordinated Entry System Policies and Procedures; and

WHEREAS, the JPA operates Coordinated Entry through a subrecipient Coordinated Entry System Operator pursuant to a separate Subrecipient Agreement, hereinafter known as the “Subrecipient Agreement”; and

WHEREAS, the Parties recognize that additional resources are needed to enable Coordinated Entry to operate an effective and efficient system to address homelessness and implement best practice solutions to leverage the existing housing stock to increase housing opportunities.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 3 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows:

I. The County and Cities agree to provide funds to the JPA over the course of three years from the effective date for Coordinated Entry services provided throughout Solano County as set forth in Exhibit B (Budget).

1. The County and Cities shall transmit annual payments to the JPA for the deliverables specified in Exhibits A and B.

2. This Memorandum of Understanding may be amended upon written agreement signed by all the Parties.

II. Program performance of the JPA

The JPA shall use funding received pursuant to this MOU to deliver the services described in Exhibit A (Scope of Work) to homeless individuals and families from the County and Cities pursuant to the terms of this MOU.

III. Fiscal responsibilities of the JPA

The JPA agrees to:

1. Monitor the activities listed in Exhibits A (Scope of Work), B (Budget), and C (Performance Objectives), and the terms of this MOU.

2. Adhere to its written JPA Continuum of Care Policies and Procedures for financial management.

3. Be liable for repayment of costs incurred for activities not consistent with Exhibits A-C. The JPA shall be afforded the opportunity to respond to any adverse findings regarding such costs before being held subject to repayment.

IV. Records, reports, and audits of the JPA

1. Governance.

a. The JPA shall have available and provide to County and/or Cities upon request:

i. A copy of current JPA Bylaws.

ii. The current roster of the JPA membership.

iii. A copy of the adopted JPA Continuum of Care Policies and Procedures Manual, inclusive of its Conflicts of Interest Policy and

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 4 its Financial Management policies and procedures.

b. The JPA shall notify the Parties if it makes any changes to its interpretation of its compliance obligations under the Ralph M. Brown Act, as specified in the JPA Bylaws, on an annual basis.

2. Establishment and maintenance of records. The JPA shall maintain records sufficient to reflect properly all matters covered by the enclosed Exhibits A-C.

3. Preservation of records. The JPA shall preserve and make available its records in accordance with its Bylaws.

4. Examination of records and/or facilities. At any time during normal business hours, and as often as may be deemed necessary, the JPA agrees that the County and/or any City, and/or any duly authorized representatives for those Parties, shall, for a period of five years following the expiration of this MOU, have access to and the right to examine its offices and facilities engaged in performance of this MOU, and audit records and data with respect to matters covered by this MOU; excepting those falling within the attorney-client and attorney- work-product privileges. The County and/or Cities shall provide the JPA with reasonable notice of any such examination.

5. County and City monitoring reviews. The County and/or Cities may conduct monitoring reviews. Such reviews may cover program compliance, as well as fiscal matters. The County and/or Cities shall provide the JPA with reasonable notice that a review will be conducted. The JPA will be afforded a reasonable period of time to respond to any monitoring findings. Cost of such reviews will be borne by the Party(ies) requesting the review. The County and/or Cities may withhold payment and/or terminate this MOU if the JPA fails to respond to or correct finding(s) within a reasonable period of time.

6. Performance reports. Throughout the MOU term, the JPA shall share performance reports prepared pursuant to the oversight of Subrecipient by the JPA.

V. Coordination of program

1. JPA. The Executive Director of the JPA, or his/her designee, shall have overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this MOU.

2. The County. The County Administrator, or his/her designee, shall serve as the point of contact for the County with respect to this MOU.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 5 3. The Cities. The City Managers, or their designees, shall serve as the point of contact with respect to this MOU.

4. Notices. All notices or other correspondence required or contemplated by this MOU shall be sent to the Parties at the following addresses:

JPA: CAP Solano JPA
Attn: DeShawn Waters, Executive Director
675 Texas Street
Fairfield, CA 94533
County: Ian Goldberg
County Administrator
Solano County
675 Texas Street, Suite 6500
Fairfield, CA 94533
City of Benicia:

Mario Giuliani
City Manager
City of Benicia
250 East L Street
Benicia, CA 94510
City of Fairfield:

David Gassaway
City Manager
City of Fairfield
1000 Webster Street
Fairfield, CA 94533
City of Rio Vista:

Kristina Miller
City Manager
City of Rio Vista
One Main Street
Rio Vista, CA 94571
City of Suisun
City:

Bret Prebula
City Manager
City of Suisun City
701 Civic Center Boulevard
Suisun City, CA 94585
City of Vacaville:

Savita Chaudhary
City Manager
City of Vacaville
650 Merchant Street
Vacaville, CA 95688

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 6 City of Vallejo: Andrew Murray
City Manager
City of Vallejo
555 Santa Clara Street
Vallejo CA 94590

VI. Compliance with law

The JPA shall become familiar and comply with and cause all its employees and contractors, if any, to become familiar and comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, codes, regulations, and decrees. Failure of the JPA to, in any manner, observe and adhere to laws as described herein or as amended, shall in no way relieve the JPA of its responsibility to adhere to same, and the JPA herein acknowledges this responsibility.

VII. Indemnification/insurance

The JPA shall indemnify, defend (with independent counsel jointly approved by the County and Cities), and hold harmless the County and Cities and their officers, officials, directors, employees, agents, volunteers, and affiliates from any and all claims, demands, causes of actions, damages, costs, expenses, actual attorney’s fees, consultant’s fees, expert fees, losses or liability, in law or in equity, of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the JPA’s operations, or any subcontractor’s operations, to be performed pursuant to this MOU or the current Subrecipient Agreement between the JPA and its Coordinated Entry System Operator, for the fullest extent permitted by law, with the exception of the sole active negligence or willful misconduct of the County and/or any of the Cities.

Per its Subrecipient Agreement with the JPA, the Coordinated Entry System Operator shall procure and maintain for the duration of its Subrecipient Agreement with the JPA insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work under its Subrecipient Agreement and the results of that work by the Coordinated Entry System Operator, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors. The County and Cities and their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be covered by the Coordinated Entry System Operator as additional insureds against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work under its Subrecipient Agreement and the results of that work

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 7 by the Coordinated Entry System Operator, its agents, representatives, employees, or subcontractors.

The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this MOU and are not limited by any provisions relating to insurance in the current Subrecipient Agreement between the JPA and its Coordinated Entry System Operator.

The JPA agrees to enforce all the insurance requirements set forth in the Terms and Conditions exhibit to the current Subrecipient Agreement between the JPA and its Coordinated Entry System Operator.

VIII. Noncompliance with Scope of Work, Budget, and Performance Objectives

1. The JPA shall be afforded the opportunity to respond to any information that suggests a failure or deficiency by the JPA to comply with any provision of this MOU. Examples of noncompliance include:

a. If the JPA (with or without knowledge) makes any material misrepresentation of any nature with respect to any information or data furnished to the Parties in connection with this MOU.

b. If there is pending litigation with respect to the performance by the JPA of any of its duties or obligations under this MOU which may materially jeopardize or adversely affect the undertaking of or the carrying out of its program.

c. If the JPA is in default under the provisions of this MOU.

d. If the JPA makes improper use of funds.

e. If the JPA fails to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this MOU in such a manner as to constitute a material breach thereof.

f. The JPA refuses to accept any additional conditions that may be imposed by the County and/or any City as a result of changes required by law or by the Federal government.

g. If the JPA fails to accomplish the scope of services listed in Exhibits A-C and pursuant to the terms of this MOU in a timely manner.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 8 2. Should the JPA be unable to resolve concerns by a Party about a perceived failure to comply with Exhibits A-C under this MOU within a reasonable period of time, that Party shall have the right to withdraw from this MOU, receive reimbursement for services not yet rendered, and/or require corrective action to enforce compliance with such provision.

IX. Suspension or Termination

1. Suspension or termination for cause. This MOU may be suspended or terminated at any time before the date of completion by the JPA or pursuant to a unanimous agreement among the County and Cities if:

a. Any party fails to comply with the conditions of this MOU as described above; or

b. The Housing First Solano CoC chooses an entity other than the JPA to operate the Coordinated Entry System; or

c. The JPA is not able to secure the resources to perform one or more of the duties described in Exhibit A: Scope of Work; or

d. The JPA no longer has adequate resources to operate the Coordinated Entry System; and

e. The offending Party or Parties is/are afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to any such concerns, and the offending Party or Parties fail(s) to resolve any such concerns.

2. Upon suspension or termination, the JPA shall:

a. Not incur new obligations and shall cancel as many outstanding obligations as possible.

b. Be paid only for services rendered to the County and each City to the date of such suspension or termination; provided, however, if the MOU is suspended or terminated for fault of the JPA, the County and each City shall be obligated to compensate the JPA only for that portion of the JPA’s services which were of benefit to the County and each City.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 9 X. Rights and remedies not waived

In no event shall payment by the County or any City or acceptance of payment by the JPA hereunder constitute or be construed to be a waiver by any Party of any breach of covenants or conditions of this MOU or any default which may then exist on the part of any Party, and the making of any such payment while any such breach or default shall exist, shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to any Party with respect to such breach or default.

XI. Integrated document

No verbal agreements or conversations with any officer, agent or employee of the County and/or Cities prior to execution of this MOU shall affect or modify any of the terms or obligations contained in any documents comprising this MOU. Any such verbal agreement shall be considered as unofficial information and in no way binding upon the Parties.

XII. Severability

In case any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall, for any reason, be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, it shall not affect the validity of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect.

XIII. Term of MOU

The Term of this MOU is for three years from December 1, 2025 – December 31, 2028.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, acting by and through their duly authorized representatives, have executed this MOU in duplicate on the day and year set below each of the parties.

For the JPA:

For Solano County, a municipal
corporation:

SIGNATURE SIGNATURE

PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME

TITLE TITLE

DATE DATE

For the City of Vacaville, a municipal
corporation:

For the City of Rio Vista, a municipal
corporation:

SIGNATURE SIGNATURE

PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME

TITLE TITLE

DATE DATE

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 11 For the City of Fairfield, a municipal
corporation:

For the City of Suisun, a municipal
corporation:

SIGNATURE SIGNATURE

PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME

TITLE TITLE

DATE DATE

For the City of Vallejo, a municipal
corporation:

For the City of Benicia, a municipal
corporation:

SIGNATURE SIGNATURE

PRINTED NAME PRINTED NAME

TITLE TITLE

DATE DATE

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 12 EXHIBIT A: SCOPE OF WORK

JPA shall be responsible for the following activities:

• Identifying and selecting the Coordinated Entry Services Operator. • Securing the necessary resources to support scope the work. • Providing technical assistance and oversight of the Coordinated Entry Services Operator.
• Providing annual reports to the County and Cities on progress in achieving the milestones.
• Ensuring that resources provided by the County and Cities will be used for the following activities:

I. Resource Connect Solano Coordinated Entry System Management

The JPA will ensure that the Coordinated Entry Services Operator will be responsible managing for the implementation and on-going administration, development, and continuous improvement of Solano County’s Coordinated Entry System in alignment with Housing First Solano’s Coordinated Entry System Policies and Procedures.

Management includes:

1. Conducting Coordinated Entry System analysis, evaluation, monitoring, and review;

2. Maintaining Coordinated Entry System documentation, which includes system performance documents, reporting data, and federal forms;

3. Developing new access and outreach/in-reach points throughout the County to ensure full and equal access;

4. Increasing the number of providers using Housing First Solano’s Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) and participating in Resource Connect Solano;

5. Creating tools and resources necessary to manage Resource Connect Solano Entry Points;

6. Ensuring consistent usage of and calibration of the assessment tool throughout the Coordinated Entry System;

7. Ensuring that the adopted prioritization criteria are used so that the most vulnerable individuals and families are prioritized for assistance and matched with the appropriate services for them ensuring the most efficient and cost- effective usage of resources;

8. Ensuring that beds and/or units fund by County or City programs that have specific client criteria are reserved for eligible program clients and input of program staff is sought before placement;

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 13 9. Managing the priority lists;

10. Ensuring timely linkage of persons to available housing and services;

11. Providing guidance, training, capacity building support, communication updates, and other project support as needed to Housing First Solano, the County, and the Cities;

12. Ensuring all participating provider agencies have information as necessary to operate and participate in Resource Connect Solano successfully;

13. Providing monthly or quarterly reports to the JPA as requested;

14. Preparing annual assessments of the Coordinated Entry System;

15. Establishing a more robust marketing plan to bring awareness to residents across the county, including those precariously housed and those least likely to receive assistance in the absence of such marketing;

16. Creating and disseminating outreach materials about Resource Connect Solano;

17. Reviewing and analyzing HMIS data, including reports on system- wide performance (e.g., clients receiving diversion assistance, vacancy reporting, completion of assessments); and

18. Maintaining the integrity of consumer data and ensuring up-to-date security protocols for the system.

II. Coordinated Entry System Administration

The JPA will ensure the Coordinated Entry Service Operator Administers System support to the Resource Connect Solano staff as well as the various jurisdictional and non-profit outreach teams. Support services include:

1. Answering and responding to all Coordinated Entry System referral calls;

2. Performing a pre-screen diversion assessment over the phone and full Vulnerability assessment, where appropriate;

3. Referring callers to the most pertinent services, including prevention services for callers at-risk of homelessness;

4. Connecting clients to case management;

5. Scheduling appointments with clients for the Coordinated Entry Specialists;

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 14 6. Providing training and technical assistance to local outreach teams to support their data entry in HMIS.

III. Other Coordinated Entry System Services

The Coordinated Entry Services Operator may offer other services such as Housing Location Services to support the staff as well as the various jurisdictional and non- profit outreach teams to identify housing opportunities for individuals experiencing homelessness. Services will be outlined in the subrecipient agreement may include:

1. Developing and managing a comprehensive outreach/ working relationship with community stakeholders, especially landlords;

2. Engaging a landlord recruitment and retention plan. Recruiting landlord, management firm, and leaseholder participation and/or growth of participation in Continuum of Care and Resource Connect Solano housing programs, which may include Permanent Supportive Housing, Rapid Rehousing, Section 8, TBRA, HUD/VASH, and other subsidy programs;

3. Meeting with owners, landlords and property managers to discuss partnering with Resource Connect Solano, including rental assistance, placement programs, and support services;

4. Negotiating with landlords experiencing conflicts with formerly homeless tenants to find solutions to experienced problems, including outside mediation services for more serious conflicts to help avoid eviction;

5. Building long-lasting relationships with property managers, landlords, owners, and firms to expand the scope of their participation in programs that house those experiencing homelessness;

6. Performing initial site visits at all prospective sites to ensure they meet guidelines for habitability standards;

7. Maintaining a database of landlords, management firms, and leaseholders working with those experiencing homelessness;

8. Sending out notices to Resource Connect Solano staff of any new housing availability;

9. Tracking all placements with landlords in HMIS;

10. Maintaining awareness of changes in market and community processes that can impact services; bring forward prospective recommendations to deal with expected changes.

11. Increase focus on systemic County-wide landlord engagement strategies.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 15 IV. Coordinated Entry System Housing Readiness Services and Case Management

The JPA will ensure that the Coordinated Entry Services Operator provides Housing Readiness Services and Case Management. This includes:

1. Counseling individuals and families at the top of the Resource Connect Solano prioritization system as to potential housing options;

2. Coordinating supportive services for individuals and families at the top of the Resource Connect Solano prioritization system;

3. Using the Coordinated Entry System to provide comprehensive assessments of participant need for housing and services;

4. Monitoring and evaluating Resource Connect Solano participant progress;

5. Providing Resource Connect Solano participant information and referrals to providers participating in the Coordinated Entry System;

6. Developing individualized housing and service plans for individuals and families at the top of the Resource Connect Solano prioritization system;

7. Providing tenant counseling to individuals and families placed within the past 30 days into housing through Resource Connect Solano;

8. Assisting individuals and families at the top of the Resource Connect Solano prioritization system or placed within the past 30 days into housing through Resource Connect Solano to understand the leasing process;

9. Assisting individuals and families at the top of the Resource Connect Solano prioritization system or placed within the past 30 days into housing through Resource Connect Solano with securing utilities;

10. Assisting individuals and families at the top of the Resource Connect Solano prioritization system or placed within the past 30 days into housing through Resource Connect Solano with making moving arrangements.

V. Coordinated Entry Systems Operations

The JPA will ensure that resources made available through this MOU for operations are allocated to items such as: the costs of office space; maintenance; office equipment; Internet access; a system website; marketing; office supplies; transportation costs incurred by the Resource Connect Solano staff; public transportation costs for consumers; and essential training and conference attendance about Coordinated Entry.

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
675 Texas Street Fairfield, CA 94533 – www.capsolanojpa.org 16 EXHIBIT B: BUDGET

I. Funding
In addition to coordinated entry staff supported by HUD CoC, which is $233,589 for FY2025/26, pursuant to this MOU, the Cities and County will provide 2026 funding of $351,638 as follows to support the activities described in Exhibit A.

Funding for calendar years 2027 and 2028 will increase at a fixed rate of three (3) percent per year.

II. Method of Payment

The County and Cities shall transmit annual payments to the JPA. The method of payment was determined by the population of the Cities with the County making a larger amount than its population and is as follows:

The JPA shall invoice the County and Cities within 30 days of the effective date of this MOU and then each year thereafter within 30 days of the same calendar date. The Cities and County shall make payment of the invoice within 30 days of the date of the invoice.

2026 2027 2028 Total

Solano
County $81,966 $84,425 $86,958 $253,350
Benicia $18,816 $19,381 $19,962 $58,158
Fairfield $77,564 $79,891 $82,288 $239,743
Rio Vista $6,127 $6,311 $6,501 $18,939
Suisun
City $19,903 $20,500 $21,115 $61,517
Vacaville $66,895 $68,902 $70,969 $206,767
Vallejo $80,366 $82,777 $85,260 $248,402
Total $351,638 $362,187 $373,053 $1,086,878

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
CAP Solano, JPA – providing a pathway to housing for everyone in Solano County

To: Natalie Peterson, Assistant to the Vallejo City Manager From: Michael Wilson, Interim Executive Director
Date: March 30, 2026
RE: Response to questions regarding the Cities and County CES MOU

We appreciate meeting with you and City Attorney Veronica Nebb on March 19th and wanted to respond to the questions in your email dated March 24th regarding the Cities and County proposed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the Coordinated Entry System (CES).

1. Please differentiate between the terms “Coordinated Entry,” “Coordinated Entry System,” “Coordinated Entry Operator.”

Coordinated Entry: This refers to the process of coordinated entry. It includes:
• A standardized approach to comprehensively assess the housing and service needs of homeless individuals and families and refer them to appropriate available resources that are needed to end their homelessness.
• Connects the community’s network of homeless services and housing resources while streamlining, standardizing, and coordinating the current homeless intake, assessment, and referral process.
• Homeless individuals and families, especially highly vulnerable individuals and families who are homeless, are the principal users.

Coordinated Entry System: This refers to the entire structure and framework supporting the process of Coordinated Entry. It includes:
• The policies and procedures
• The staffing and roles
• The access points (physical or virtual)
• The assessment tools
• The data infrastructure (HMIS, software, forms)

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP SOLANO

JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY
CAP Solano, JPA – providing a pathway to housing for everyone in Solano County

Coordinated Entry [System] Operator: The agency the JPA will contract with who operates the system on a day to day basis.
• Entity responsible for running and managing the day-to-day operations of a community’s Coordinated Entry System.
• Oversees the coordinated entry workflow.
• Ensures assessments are completed and accurate.
• Manages referrals to housing programs.
• Monitors prioritization lists.
• Trains and supports access point staff.
• Ensures data quality and HMIS compliance.
• Tracks system performance and generates reports.
• Ensures compliance with HUD and local CoC policies.
• Troubleshoots issues across access points and agencies. • Serves as the main operational contact for the system. •

2. Please Define subrecipient term under IV # 6.

The Subrecipient as discussed in Section IV.6. is the agency contracted with the CAP Solano JPA to serve as the Coordinated Entry System Operator.

3. Please confirm that “death” is included under insurance naming County, Cities & Coordinated Entry System Operator as additional insured. “Death” is included in the Indemnification section of the RFP (CES-2025-01, p 16) and will be included in the subrecipient contract with the CES Operator.

4. Please confirm where outcomes/objectives and reporting structure will be outlined (e.g. subrecipient agreement).

The CAP Solano JPA is currently in a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for Coordinated Entry Operator. The resulting subrecipient contract will include outcomes/objectives and reporting structure which will be reported to jurisdictions which are participating in the CAP Solano JPA.

CONSENT CALENDAR 8.J.

DATE: May 12, 2026
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Brad Job, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)

BETWEEN THE CITY OF VALLEJO AND THE VALLEJO FLOOD AND WASTEWATER

DISTRICT, SPECIFICALLY OUTLINING THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF

EACH AGENCY RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE MUNICIPAL REGIONAL

STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED BY THE STATE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of Vallejo and the Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District, specifically outlining the duties and responsibilities of each agency related to compliance with the Municipal Regional Stormwater Discharge Permit issued by the State and authorizing the City Manager to execute same.

REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION
The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region (Regional Board) Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, Order No. R2-2015- 0049, NPDES No. CAS612008 Municipal Regional Permit (MRP). As co-permittees, both agencies share responsibility for implementing stormwater management measures and ensuring compliance with federal and state regulatory requirements established under the Clean Water Act. The most recent Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the District was executed in March 2016 to support the implementation of MRP-2. Since that time, the Regional Board adopted the third iteration of the permit (MRP- 3), which became effective July 1, 2023. MRP-3 includes expanded regulatory requirements, enhanced programmatic elements, and additional implementation responsibilities related to municipal stormwater management and pollutant reduction. Accordingly, the existing MOU requires revision to reflect the updated regulatory framework and to clearly delineate agency roles and responsibilities associated with implementation of the new and revised provisions contained in MRP-3. Updating the MOU will ensure that each permit requirement is assigned to the appropriate entity and that program implementation remains consistent, coordinated, and compliant with Regional Board expectations. Beyond regulatory compliance, the MOU continues to serve as the foundational governance document guiding coordination between the City and the District. The agreement establishes a collaborative framework intended to promote efficient program implementation, effective resource utilization, and clear accountability, thereby ensuring that all applicable provisions of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit are fully and effectively implemented.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
The City of Vallejo (City) and the Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District (District) are co-permittees under the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region (“Regional Board”) Municipal Regional Stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit, Order No. R2-2015- 0049, NPDES No. CAS612008 Municipal Regional Permit (MRP). As co-permittees, both agencies share

Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)

BETWEEN THE CITY OF VALLEJO AND THE VALLEJO FLOOD AND

WASTEWATER DISTRICT, SPECIFICALLY OUTLINING THE DUTIES AND

RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH AGENCY RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE

MUNICIPAL REGIONAL STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED BY THE STATE AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME

identical regulatory reporting obligations under the permit and operate within the same geographic and political jurisdiction.

Operational responsibilities for stormwater infrastructure are divided between the two agencies. The District owns and maintains the municipal storm drain system downstream of the storm drain inlet grates, including conveyance infrastructure and associated facilities. The City is responsible for stormwater source control, pollutant prevention, and maintenance activities occurring before stormwater enters storm drain inlets, including those within the public right-of-way and other City-maintained areas.

On January 25, 2016, Regional Board staff conducted a compliance inspection of the City’s and District’s Municipal Stormwater Program. Following the inspection, the Regional Board issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) dated March 22, 2016, identifying three violations and establishing 19 required actions and five recommended actions to address deficiencies and improve program implementation. In response, the City and the District collaborated on a joint response to the Regional Board dated May 2, 2016, outlining corrective actions and identifying which agency would be responsible for addressing each item contained in the NOV.

Required Action No. 2 of the NOV directed the City and the District to review each provision of the current MRP (MRP-2) and identify which agency would be responsible for implementing each requirement. To comply with this directive, the City and District developed and executed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that formally delineated roles and responsibilities for implementation of the MRP-2 provisions. The MOU is intended to provide clear accountability, reduce duplication of efforts, and ensure that all permit requirements are implemented in a coordinated and compliant manner.

In July 2023, the Regional Board adopted the third iteration of the permit (MRP-3), which introduced additional regulatory requirements, expanded programmatic elements, and enhanced compliance expectations. As a result, it is necessary to update the existing MOU to incorporate the new and revised provisions of MRP-3 and to clearly assign implementation responsibilities between the City and the District.

In addition to defining implementation responsibilities, the MOU also supports coordination related to preparation of the co-permittees’ annual Municipal Stormwater Program reports, which are submitted to the Regional Board each September. Historically, the City and the District have exchanged information and attempted to coordinate prior to submitting their respective Annual Reports. Nevertheless, information has at times been inadvertently omitted, modified late in the reporting process, or duplicated between agencies, which created inconsistencies and confusion during Regional Board review. The updated MOU is intended to improve continued coordination, streamline data sharing, and ensure consistency in reporting.

The City and District also acknowledge that future implementation of the MRP may necessitate adjustments to program responsibilities as regulatory requirements evolve or operational considerations change. The MOU therefore includes provisions stating that, upon request of either party, the City and District will meet and confer in good faith to evaluate and amend the agreement as necessary to reflect evolving program needs.

Overall, the MOU serves as a key inter-agency governance document that demonstrates the City’s and District’s commitment to coordinated stormwater management, regulatory compliance, and shared accountability for implementation of all applicable provisions of MRP-3. From a regulatory compliance perspective, the MOU was explicitly identified by the Regional Water Quality Control Board as a required corrective action in the 2016 Notice of Violation. As such, failure to approve the MOU may be interpreted as non-compliance with previously mandated directives. This could expose the City and District to further

Date: May 12, 2026
Subject: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)

BETWEEN THE CITY OF VALLEJO AND THE VALLEJO FLOOD AND

WASTEWATER DISTRICT, SPECIFICALLY OUTLINING THE DUTIES AND

RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH AGENCY RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE

MUNICIPAL REGIONAL STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED BY THE STATE AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAME

enforcement actions, including the potential issuance of an additional Notice of Violation by the Regional Board.

FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) will not result in any additional costs associated with compliance with the Regional Board NPDES Permit requirements. The MOU is merely an administrative document intended to clarify and formalize the division of responsibilities between the City and District for the implementation of MRP-3.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15268, Ministerial Projects, because compliance with the regulatory requirements and specific provisions of the MRP-3 is mandatory. To the extent that such compliance consists of maintenance of existing facilities and/or minor repairs to existing facilities, these would also be exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Existing Facilities.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution Approving MOU_CAO Stamp

2. MOU Attachment A - MRP 3.0 Duties

3. Ex A - MOU VFWD and CoV MRP 3.0 Recitals - CAO Stamp

CONTACT
Brad Job, Public Works Director707) 648-4105
[email protected]

RESOLUTION NO. 26- N.C.

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF VALLEJO AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN

THE CITY OF VALLEJO AND THE VALLEJO FLOOD AND WASTEWATER DISTRICT

SPECIFICALLY OUTLINING THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF EACH AGENCY

RELATED TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE MUNICIPAL REGIONAL STORMWATER PERMIT

ISSUED BY THE STATE
WHEREAS, in 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act to reduce pollution from factories, municipal sewage treatment plants, and similar facilities that discharge waste to streams, rivers, lakes, or bays; and
WHEREAS, the 1987 Amendments to the Clean Water Act expanded the pollution reduction mandate to include discharges from Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s, or storm drains); and
WHEREAS, the California Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco Bay Region (RWQCB) issued the first California municipal stormwater National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits in 1989; and
WHEREAS, the stormwater NPDES permits require owners of MS4s—including cities, towns, and counties; state and regional transportation agencies; flood control districts; and others—to control the myriad sources of pollutants that enter and are transported through their systems; and
WHEREAS, the City of Vallejo (“City”) and the Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District (“District”) have reviewed the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP) and have jointly determined which entity is responsible for each applicable provision to ensure all requirements are appropriately implemented; and
WHEREAS, the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) formalizes the respective responsibilities of the City and the District in relation to the MRP requirements; and WHEREAS, this Memorandum of Understanding serves as a foundation for a cooperative and mutually beneficial working relationship between the City and the District to ensure compliance with the MRP.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute the Memorandum of Understanding, attached hereto as Exhibit A, on behalf of the City.

Adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Vallejo, State of California, on the 14th day of April 2026 by the following vote to-wit:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

________________________________

ANDREA SORCE, MAYOR

_________________________________
DAWN G. ABRAHAMSON, CITY CLERK

CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency
A. DISCHARGE PROHIBITIONS
A.1. The Permittees shall, within their respective jurisdictions, effectively prohibit the discharge of non-stormwater (materials other than stormwater) into storm drain systems and watercourses. NPDES-permitted discharges are exempt from this prohibition. Provision C.15 describes a tiered categorization of non-stormwater discharges based on potential for pollutant content that may be discharged upon adequate assurance that the discharge contains no pollutants of concern at concentrations that will impact beneficial uses or cause exceedances of water quality standards.

B
A.2. It shall be prohibited to discharge rubbish, refuse, bark, sawdust, or other solid wastes into surface waters or at any place where they would contact or where they would be eventually transported to surface waters, including flood plain areas. Permittees are also subject to the trash discharge prohibition in the Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California and the Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California.

B
B. RECEIVING WATER LIMITATIONS
B.1. The discharge shall not cause the following conditions to create a condition of nuisance or to adversely affect beneficial uses of waters of the State: B B.1.a. Floating, suspended, or deposited macroscopic particulate matter, or foam; B.1.b. Bottom deposits or aquatic growths;
B.1.c. Alteration of temperature, turbidity, or apparent color beyond present natural background levels; B.1.d. Visible, floating, suspended, or deposited oil or other products of petroleum origin; and B.1.d. Substances present in concentrations or quantities that would cause deleterious effects on aquatic biota, wildlife, or waterfowl, or that render any of these unfit for human consumption.

B.2. The discharge shall not cause or contribute to a violation of any applicable water quality standard for receiving waters. If applicable water quality objectives are adopted and approved by the State Water Board after the date of the adoption of this Order, the Water Board may revise and modify this Order as appropriate.

B
C.1. Compliance with Discharge Prohibitions and Receiving Waters Limitations The Permittees shall comply with Discharge Prohibitions A.1 and A.2 and Receiving Water Limitations B.1 and B.2 through the timely implementation of control measures and other actions as specified in Provisions C.2 through C.24. Compliance with Provisions C.9 through C.12, C.14, C.18 (pertaining to the Pescadero-Butano Sediment TMDL), and C.19.c-f of this Order, which prescribe requirements and schedules for Permittees identified therein to manage their discharges that may cause or contribute to violations of water quality standards (WQS) for pesticides, trash, mercury, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), bacteria, sediment, diazinon and chlorpyrifos, and methylmercury, shall constitute compliance during the term of this Order with Receiving Water Limitations B.1 and B.2 for the pollutants and the receiving waters identified in the provisions. Compliance with Provision C.10 which prescribes requirements and schedules for Permittees to manage their discharges of trash, shall also constitute compliance with Discharge Prohibitions A.1 and A.2 during the term of this Order for discharges of trash. If exceedance(s) of WQS, except for exceedances of WQS for pesticides, trash, mercury, PCBs, bacteria, sediment, diazinon and chlorpyrifos, and methylmercury that are managed pursuant to Provisions C.9 through C.12, C.14, C.18 (pertaining to the Pescadero-Butano Sediment TMDL), and C.19.c-f, persist in receiving waters notwithstanding the implementation of the required controls and actions, the Permittees shall comply with the following procedure:

B

C.1.a.  Upon a determination by either the Permittee(s) or the Water Board that discharges are causing or contributing to an exceedance of an applicable (WQS), the Permittee(s) shall notify, within no more than 30 days, and thereafter submit a report to the Water Board that describes controls or best management practices (BMPs) that are currently being implemented, and the current level of implementation, and additional controls or BMPs that will be implemented, and/or an increased level of implementation, to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants that are causing or contributing to the exceedance of water quality standards. The report may be submitted in conjunction with the Annual Report, unless the Water Board directs an earlier submittal, and shall constitute a request to the Water Board for amendment of this NPDES Permit. The report and application for amendment shall include an implementation schedule. The Water Board may require modifications to the report and application for amendment; and B
C.1.b. C.1.b.Submit any modifications to the report required by the Water Board within 30 days of notification. As long as Permittees have complied with the procedures set forth above, they do not have to repeat the same procedure for continuing or recurring exceedances of the same receiving water limitations unless directed by the Water Board to develop additional control measures and BMPs and reinitiate the Permit amendment process.

B
C.2. Municipal Operations
The purpose of this provision is to ensure implementation of appropriate BMPs by all Permittees to control and reduce non-stormwater and polluted stormwater discharges to storm drains and watercourses during operation, inspection, and routine repair and maintenance activities of municipal facilities and infrastructure.

C.2.a Street and Road Repair and Maintenance
i. Task Description – Asphalt/Concrete Removal, Cutting, Installation, and Repair C The Permittees shall implement appropriate BMPs, such as those described in the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Municipal Stormwater BMP Handbook and Construction Stormwater BMP Handbook, at street and road repair and/or maintenance sites to control debris and waste materials during road and parking lot installation, repaving, repair, or maintenance activities. ii. Implementation Levels B
(1) The Permittees shall require proper management of concrete slurry and wastewater, asphalt, pavement cutting, and other street and road maintenance materials and wastewater to avoid discharge to storm drains from such work sites. The Permittees shall coordinate with sanitary sewer agencies to determine if wastewater generated from road construction, repair, and maintenance activities may be discharged to the sanitary sewer system, provided appropriate approvals are obtained and pretreatment standards are met. (2) The Permittees shall require sweeping and/or vacuuming to remove debris, concrete, or sediment residues from work sites upon completion of work.

The Permittees shall require cleanup of all construction debris, spills, and leaks using dry methods (e.g., absorbent materials, rags, pads, and vacuuming), as described in the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA) Blueprint for a Clean Bay or the CASQA Municipal Stormwater BMP Handbook.
iii.  Reporting B
(1) The Permittees shall report on implementation of and compliance with these BMPs in the Annual Report. (2) Permittees shall make applicable supporting BMP documents available to Water Board staff or representatives during audits or inspections, and upon request.

C.2.b. Sidewalk/Plaza Maintenance and Pavement Washing B i. Task Description – The Permittees shall implement and require to be implemented BMPs that prevent the discharge of polluted wash water and non- stormwater to storm drains from pavement, sidewalk and plaza cleaning, mobile cleaning, outdoor pressure washing operations, and washing down of trash areas and gas station or mobile fueling service areas. BMPs for washing down outside areas of human habitation shall include sanitizing procedures. The Permittees shall implement BMPs such as those included in the BASMAA Mobile Surface Cleaner Program. The Permittees shall coordinate with sanitary sewer agencies to determine if disposal to the sanitary sewer is available for the wastewater generated from these activities provided that appropriate approvals and pretreatment standards are met. ii. Reporting B
(1) The Permittees shall report on implementation of and compliance with these BMPs in the Annual Report. (2) Permittees shall make applicable supporting BMP documents available to Water Board staff or representatives during audits or inspections, and upon request.

C.2.c. Bridge and Structure Maintenance and Graffiti Removal C i. Task Description C
(1) The Permittees shall implement appropriate BMPs to prevent the discharge of polluted stormwater and non-stormwater from bridges and structural maintenance activities directly into surface waters or storm drains. (2) The Permittees shall implement BMPs for graffiti removal that prevent non-stormwater and wash water discharges into storm drains. ii. Implementation Levels
(1) The Permittees shall prevent all debris and pollutants, including structural materials and coating debris, such as paint chips, generated in bridge and structure maintenance or graffiti removal, from entering storm drains or water courses.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(2) The Permittees shall protect nearby storm drain inlets before removing graffiti from walls, signs, sidewalks, or other structures. The Permittees shall prevent any discharge of debris, cleaning compound waste, paint waste, or wash water due to graffiti removal from entering storm drains or watercourses.

C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(3) The Permittees shall use proper disposal methods for wastes generated from these activities. The Permittees shall train their employees and/or specify in contracts the proper capture and disposal methods for the wastes generated. iii. Reporting C
(1) The Permittees shall report on implementation of and compliance with these BMPs in the Annual Report. (2) Permittees shall make applicable supporting BMP documents available to Water Board staff or representatives during audits or inspections, and upon request.

C.2.d. Stormwater Pump Stations D
i. Task Description - The Permittees shall implement measures to operate, inspect, and maintain stormwater pump stations to eliminate non-stormwater discharges containing pollutants, and to reduce pollutant loads in stormwater discharges to comply with WQSs. ii. Implementation Levels - The Permittees shall comply with the following at Permittee-owned or -operated pump stations:
(1) Upon becoming aware that the discharge from a pump station has a dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration below 3.0 mg/L, implement corrective actions, such as continuous pumping at a low flow rate, aeration, or other appropriate methods to maintain DO concentrations of the discharge above 3 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and verify the effectiveness of the corrective actions with monitoring. Corrective actions do not need to be implemented on discharges from pump stations that remain in the stormwater collection system or infiltrate into a dry creek immediately downstream. (2) Ensure that pump stations are free from debris and trash and replace any oil absorbent booms, as needed, and investigate and abate illicit discharges.

Pump stations excluded from C.2.d.ii.(1) above are not excluded from this requirement. (3) The Permittees shall maintain records of inspection, maintenance, implementation of corrective actions, and any monitoring records at Permittee- owned or -operated pumped stations. These records shall be made available to Water Board staff or its representatives during inspections and audits, or otherwise upon request.

C.2.e. Rural Public Works Construction and Maintenance
i.  Task Description - Rural Road and Public Works Construction and Maintenance.  For the purpose of this provision, rural means any watershed or portion thereof that is developed with large lot home-sites, such as one acre or larger, or with primarily agricultural, grazing, or open space uses. Rural roads include paved, unpaved, utility, and access roads in rural areas. The Permittees shall implement and require contractors to implement BMPs for erosion and sediment control during and after construction for maintenance activities on rural roads, such as those in the CASQA Construction Stormwater BMP Handbook, particularly in or adjacent to stream channels or wetlands. The Permittees shall notify the Water Board, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, where applicable, and obtain appropriate agency permits for rural public works activities before work in or near creeks and wetlands. San Mateo County has additional rural road requirements for the Pescadero-Butano Sediment TMDL described in Provision C.18 and shall also implement that provision.

N/A
ii.  Implementation Levels N/A
(1) The Permittees shall continue to implement erosion and sediment control BMPs, in addition to those described in Provision C.2.a, during construction and maintenance activities on rural roads, including developing and implementing appropriate training and technical assistance resources for rural public works activities.
(2) The Permittees shall implement appropriate BMPs to minimize impacts on streams and wetlands in the course of rural road and public works maintenance and construction activities by:
(a) Selecting road design, construction, maintenance, and repairs in rural areas that prevent and control road-related erosion and sediment transport; (b) Identifying and prioritizing rural road maintenance on the basis of soil erosion potential, slope steepness, and stream habitat resources; (c) Construction of roads and culverts that do not impact creek functions. New or replaced culverts shall not create a migratory fish passage barrier, where migratory fish are present, or lead to stream instability; (d) Implementing an inspection program to maintain rural roads’ structural integrity and prevent impacts to water quality; (e) Maintaining rural roads adjacent to streams and riparian habitat to reduce erosion, replace damaging shotgun culverts, and address excessive erosion;   (f) Re-grading of unpaved rural roads to slope outward where consistent with road engineering safety standards, and installation of water bars as appropriate; and
(g) Replacing existing culverts or design of new culverts or bridge crossings shall use measures to reduce erosion, provide fish passage, and maintain natural stream geomorphology in a stable manner.
(3) The Permittees shall incorporate existing training and guidance on permitting requirements for rural public works activities so as to stress the importance of proper planning and construction to avoid water quality impacts. (4) The Permittees shall provide training incorporating these BMPs to rural public works maintenance staff at least twice within this Permit term. iii. Reporting - The Permittees shall report on the implementation of and compliance with BMPs for rural public works construction and maintenance activities, including reporting on increased maintenance in priority areas, in the Annual Report.

NA
C.2.f. Corporation Yard BMP Implementation B
i.  Task Description - Corporation Yard Maintenance
(1) The Permittees shall implement and maintain a site-specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for corporation yards, including municipal vehicle and heavy equipment maintenance yards and parking areas, and material storage facilities, to comply with water quality standards. Each SWPPP shall incorporate all appropriate BMPs, such as those described in the current versions of the CASQA Municipal Stormwater BMP Handbook or the Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbook Maintenance Staff Guide, and addenda, as applicable.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(2) The requirements in this provision shall apply only to facilities that are not covered under the State Water Board’s Industrial Stormwater NPDES General Permit.
ii. Implementation Level B
(1) Implement BMPs to minimize pollutant discharges in stormwater and prohibit non-stormwater discharges, such as wash waters and street sweeper, vactor, and other related equipment wash water. Pollution control actions shall include, but not be limited to, good housekeeping practices, material and waste storage control, and vehicle leak and spill control. (2) Routinely inspect corporation yards to ensure that non-stormwater discharges are not entering the storm drain system and that pollutant discharges are prevented to the maximum extent practicable. At a minimum, each corporation yard shall be fully inspected each year between August 1 and September 30. Permittees shall cease or cause to be ceased any active non-stormwater discharges immediately after they are discovered. Corrective actions shall be implemented before the next rain event, but no longer than 10 business days after the potential and/or actual discharges are discovered.

Corrective actions can be temporary, in which case more time can be allowed for permanent corrective actions. If more than 10 business days are required for compliance, a rationale shall be recorded. (3) Plumb all vehicle and equipment wash areas to the sanitary sewer after coordination with the local sanitary sewer agency and equip with a pretreatment device (if necessary) in accordance with the requirements of the local sanitary sewer agency. In areas where a sanitary sewer connection is not available, the Permittees shall collect and haul the wash water to an alternative sanitary sewer connection or municipal wastewater treatment plant, or implement appropriate BMPs to collect, properly treat, and reuse wash water onsite without any discharge. (4) Use dry cleanup methods when cleaning debris and spills from corporation yards. If wet cleaning methods must be used (e.g., pressure         washing), the Permittee shall ensure that wash water is collected and disposed in the sanitary sewer after coordination with the local sanitary sewer agency and in accordance with the requirements of the local sanitary sewer agency. Any private companies hired by the Permittee to perform cleaning activities on Permittee-owned property shall follow the same requirements. In areas where a sanitary sewer connection is not available, the Permittees shall collect and haul the wash water to a municipal wastewater treatment plant, or implement appropriate BMPs  and dispose of the wastewater to land in a manner that does not adversely impact surface water or groundwater. (5) Outdoor storage areas containing pollutants shall be covered and/or bermed to prevent discharges of polluted stormwater runoff or run-on to storm drain inlets.
iii.  Reporting B
(1) In each Annual Report, Permittees shall list activities conducted in the corporation yards that have BMPs in the site-specific SWPPP, the date(s) of inspections, the results of inspections, and any follow-up actions, including the date of any necessary corrective actions implemented. The information may be reported in a narrative or tabular format.
(2) In the 2023 Annual Report, Permittees shall make their corporation yard SWPPPs available to the Water Board by providing links to online documents or submitting the documents as part of the Annual Report.

C.2.g.  Storm Drain Inlet Marking  D
i. Task Description - Permittees shall mark and maintain municipally- maintained storm drain inlets with an appropriate stormwater pollution prevention message, such as “No dumping, drains to Bay” or equivalent. For newly approved, privately maintained streets, Permittees shall require storm drain inlet markings with an appropriate stormwater pollution prevention message by the project developer upon construction and maintenance of markings through the development maintenance entity. Markings on the storm drain inlets shall be verified prior to acceptance of the project. ii. Implementation Level
(1) Inspect and maintain storm drain inlet markings of at least 80 percent of municipality-maintained inlets to ensure they are legibly labeled with a no dumping message or equivalent once per permit term.
(2) Storm drain inlet markings of newly developed, privately maintained streets shall be verified prior to acceptance of the project. Permittees shall require maintenance of the storm drain inlet markings through the development maintenance entity. (3) Certify that all privately maintained streets had storm drain inlet markings verified prior to acceptance of the project and were required to maintain the storm drain inlet markings through the development maintenance entity. iii. Reporting - In the 2026 Annual Report, each Permittee shall (1) state how many municipally-maintained storm drain inlets it has, (2) certify that at least 80 percent of municipality-maintained storm drain inlet markings are legibly labeled with an appropriate stormwater pollution prevention message during the permit term; and (3) include a picture of a labeled municipality-maintained inlet.

C.2.h.  Staff Training C
i.  Task Description - Permittees shall ensure municipal maintenance staff conducting routine repair and maintenance activities of municipal facilities and infrastructure, or activities related to the implementation of corporation yard SWPPPs, are appropriately trained on the requirements of Provision C.2 and methods of implementation. Trainings may be program-wide, region-wide, or Permittee-specific. ii.  Implementation Levels - At a minimum, provide training at least once within the 5-year term of this Permit to municipal staff on the following topics as relevant to municipal staff responsible for maintenance activities:
(1) Stormwater pollution prevention;
(2) Appropriate BMPs for Maintenance andd cleanup activities; B
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(3)  Street and Road Repair and Maintenance BMPs;
(4) Sidewalk/Plaza Maintenance and Pavement Washing;
(5) Bridge and Sructure Maintenance and Graffiti Removal; (6) Corporation Yard SWPPPs and BMPs; and
(7) Spill and discharge response and notificaion procedures and contacts. iii. Reporting - The Permittees shall include the following information in each Annual Report:
(1) Dates of training;
(2) Training topics covered;
(3) Total number of Permittee maintenance staff;
(4) Number and percentage of Permittee maintenance staff who attended training; (5) If there was no training in a given year, so state.

C.3.  New Development and Redevelopment C
The goal of Provision C.3 is for the Permittees to use their planning authorities to include appropriate source control, site design, and stormwater treatment measures in new development and significant redevelopment projects to address stormwater runoff pollutant discharges and prevent increases in runoff flows from new development and redevelopment projects. This goal is to be accomplished primarily through the implementation of low impact development (LID) techniques.
ii.SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

C.3.a. New Development and Redevelopment Performance Standard Implementation C i. Task Description - At a minimum, each Permittee shall:
(1) Have adequate legal authority to implement all requirements of Provision C.3; B (2) Have adequate development review and permitting procedures to impose conditions of approval or other enforceable mechanisms to implement the requirements of Provision C.3. For projects discharging directly to CWA section 303(d)-listed waterbodies, conditions of approval must require that post- development runoff not exceed pre-development levels for such pollutants that are listed; C
(3) Evaluate potential water quality effects and identify appropriate mitigation measures when conducting environmental reviews, such as under CEQA; (4) Provide training adequate to implement the requirements of Provision C.3 for staff, including interdepartmental training; (5) Provide outreach adequate to implement the requirements of Provision C.3, including providing education materials to municipal staff, developers, contractors, construction site operators, and owner/builders, early in the planning process and as appropriate; (6) For all new development and redevelopment projects that are subject to the Permittee’s planning, building, development, or other comparable review, but not regulated by Provision C.3, encourage the inclusion of adequate site design measures that may include minimizing land disturbance and impervious surfaces (especially parking lots); clustering of structures and pavement; directing roof runoff to vegetated areas; use of micro-detention, including distributed landscape-based detention; preservation of open space; and protection and/or restoration of riparian areas and wetlands as project amenities;(7) For all new development and redevelopment projects that are subject to the Permittee’s planning, building, development, or other comparable review, but not regulated by Provision C.3, encourage the inclusion of adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff. These source control measures should include:
· Storm drain inlet stenciling.
· Landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration where possible, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates appropriate sustainable landscaping practices and programs, such as Bay-Friendly Landscaping. · Appropriate covers, drains, and storage precautions for outdoor material storage areas, loading docks, repair/maintenance bays, and fueling areas. · Covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures.
·  Plumbing of the following discharges to the sanitary sewer, subject to the local sanitary sewer agency’s regulations and standards:
·  Discharges from indoor floor mat/equipment/hood filter wash racks or covered outdoor wash racks for restaurants. ·  Dumpster drips from covered trash and food compactor enclosures. · Discharges from outdoor covered wash areas for vehicles, equipment, and accessories. ·  Swimming pool water, if discharge to onsite vegetated areas is not a feasible option. ·  Fire sprinkler test water, if discharge to onsite vegetated areas is not a feasible option. (8) Revise, as necessary, General Plans to integrate water quality and watershed protection with water supply, flood control, habitat protection, groundwater recharge, and other sustainable development principles and policies (e.g., referencing the ReScape California Guidelines). ii. Reporting - Provide a brief summary of the method(s) of implementation of Provisions C.3.a.i.(1)–(8) in the 2023 Annual Report.

C.3.b. Regulated Projects C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

i. Task Description - The Permittees shall require all projects fitting the category descriptions listed in Provision C.3.b.ii. below (hereinafter called Regulated Projects) to implement LID source control, site design, and stormwater treatment onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility1 in accordance with Provisions C.3.c. and C.3.d., unless the Provision C.3.e. alternate compliance options are invoked. For Regulated Projects that will discharge runoff to a joint stormwater treatment facility, the treatment facility must be completed by the end of construction of the first Regulated Project that will be discharging runoff to the joint stormwater treatment facility. (1) Any Regulated Project that has been approved with stormwater treatment measures in compliance with Provision C.3.d. under a previous MS4 permit is exempt from the requirements of Provision C.3.c. (low impact development requirements). (2) Any Regulated Project that was approved with no Provision C.3. stormwater treatment requirements under a previous MS4 permit and that has not begun construction by the effective date of this permit, shall be required to fully comply with the requirements of C.3.c. and C.3.d. Permittees may grant exemptions from this requirement as follows:
(a) An exemption may be granted to:
(i) Any Regulated Project that was previously approved with a vesting tentative map that confers a vested right to proceed with development in substantial compliance with the ordinance, policies, and standards in effect at the time the vesting tentative map was approved or conditionally approved, as allowed by State law.
(ii) Any Regulated Project for which the Permittee has no legal authority to require changes to previously granted approvals, such as projects that have been granted building permits.
(b) An exemption from the LID requirements of Provision C.3.c. may be granted to any Regulated Project as long as stormwater treatment with media filters is provided that comply with the hydraulic sizing requirements of Provision C.3.d. (3) Any pending Regulated Project that has not yet been approved as of June 30, 2023, and for which a Permittee has no legal authority to require new requirements under Government Code sections 66474.2 or 65589.5., subd. (o), is subject to the Provision C.3 requirements in effect on the Permit's effective date.
ii. Regulated Projects are defined in the following categories: C (1) Special Land Use Categories
(a) New Development or redevelopment projects that fall into one of the categories listed below and that create and/or replace 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). This category includes development projects of the following four types on public or private land that fall under the planning and building authority of a Permittee, including sidewalks and any other portions of the public right of way that are developed or redeveloped as part of the project2:
(i) Auto service facilities, described by the following Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes: 5013, 5014, 5541, 7532- 7534, and 7536-7539; (ii) Retail gasoline outlets;
(iii) Restaurants (SIC Code 5812); or
(iv) Stand-alone uncovered parking lots and uncovered parking lots that are part of a development project if the parking lot creates and/or replaces 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface. This category includes the top uncovered portion of parking structures, unless drainage from the uncovered portion is connected to the sanitary sewer along with the covered portions of the parking structure. (b) For redevelopment projects in the categories specified in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(a)(i)-(iv):
(i) The following interior and exterior practices are excluded:
a.  Interior remodels; and
b.  Routine maintenance or repair such as roof or exterior wall surface replacement. (ii) The following pavement maintenance practices are excluded:
a.  Pothole and square cut patching;
b. Overlaying existing ashphalt or concrete pavement with asphalt or concrete without expanding the area of coverage; c.  Shoulder grading;
d. Reshaping/regrading drainage systems
e. Crack sealing;
f.  Pavement preservation activities that do not expand the road prism; g. Upgrading from a bituminous surface treatment (e.g., chip seal)3 with an overlay of asphalt or concrete, without expanding the area of coverage;4 h.  Applying a bituminous surface treatment to existing asphalt or concrete pavement, without expanding the area of coverage; and i. Vegetation maintenance
j. Laying gravel over exisiting gravel road, without expanding the area of coverage. (iii) The following pavement maintenance practices are not excluded. For Road Reconstruction Projects, these practices are included only if they trigger all criteria specified in Provision C.3.b.ii.(5), including the criteria regarding contiguousness.

C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

a. Removing and replacing an asphalt or concrete pavement to the top of the base course5 or lower, or repairing the pavement base (including repair of the pavement base in preparation for bituminous surface treatment, such as chip seal), as these are considered replaced impervious surfaces; b. Extending the pavement edge without increasing the size of the road prism, or paving graveled shoulders, as these are considered new impervious surfaces; and
c. Resurfacing by upgrading from dirt to gravel, to a bituminous surface treatment (e.g., chip seal),3 to asphalt, or to concrete; or upgrading from gravel to a bituminous surface treatment, to asphalt, or to concrete, as these are considered new impervious surfaces. (iv) For a project consisting of a combination of exempted pavement maintenance practices (pursuant to Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(b)(ii)), non-exempted pavement maintenance practices (pursuant to Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(b)(iii)), and/or practices that fall under any other Regulated Project category (pursuant to Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)-(6)), the parts of the project that are not exempt shall be evaluated as a Regulated Project. (c) Where a redevelopment project in the categories specified in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(a)(i)-(iv) results in an alteration of 50 percent or more of the impervious surface of a previously existing development that was not subject to Provision C.3, the entire project, consisting of all existing, new, and/or replaced impervious surfaces, must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the entire redevelopment project). (d) Where a redevelopment project in the categories specified in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(a)(i)-(iv) results in an alteration of less than 50 percent of the impervious surface of a previously existing development that was not subject to Provision C.3, only the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project). (e) The calculations in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(c)-(d) shall include portions of the public right of way that are developed or redeveloped as part of the Regulated Project.
(2) Other Development Projects
New development projects that create 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site) including commercial, industrial, residential housing subdivisions (i.e., detached single-family home subdivisions, multi-family attached subdivisions (town homes), condominiums, and apartments), mixed-use, and public projects (other than public road projects), including sidewalks and any other portions of the public right of way that are developed or redeveloped as part of the projects.2 This category includes development projects on public or private land that fall under the planning and building authority of a Permittee. (3) Other Redevelopment Projects
Redevelopment projects that create and/or replace 5,000 square feet or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site) including commercial, industrial, residential housing subdivisions (i.e., detached single-family home subdivisions, multi-family attached subdivisions (town homes), condominiums, and apartments), mixed-use, new and reconstructed private roads and private trails, and public projects (other than public road and trail projects),6 including sidewalks and any other portions of the public right of way that are developed or redeveloped as part of the projects.2 Redevelopment is any land-disturbing activity that results in the creation, addition, or replacement of exterior impervious surface area on a site on which some past development has occurred.This category includes redevelopment projects on public or private land that fall under the planning and building authority of a Permittee.

Specific exclusions that apply to this category are listed in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(b). Public works projects that are additionally excluded from this category – unless they create and/or replace 5,000 contiguous8 square feet or more of impervious surface – include the following examples: sidewalk gap closures,7 sidewalk section replacement, and ADA curb ramps. However, as noted above, portions of the public right of way that are developed or redeveloped as part of Regulated Projects (e.g., curb extensions, pavement replacement, and curb and gutter replacement) shall be included in the total created and/or replaced impervious surface that must be treated by those Regulated Projects (a) Where a redevelopment project results in an alteration of 50 percent or more of the impervious surface of a previously existing development that was not subject to Provision C.3, the entire project, consisting of all existing, new, and/or replaced impervious surfaces, must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the entire redevelopment project). (b) Where a redevelopment results in an alteration of less than 50 percent of the impervious surface of a previously existing development that was not subject to Provision C.3, only the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project must be included (c) The calculations in Provision C.3.b.ii.(3)(a)-(b) shall include portions of the public right of way that are developed or redeveloped as part of the Regulated Project.
(4) New or Widening Road Projects
Any of the following types of road projects that create 5,000 square feet or more of newly constructed contiguous8 impervious surface, that are both public and private road projects, and that fall under the building and planning authority of a Permittee:
(a) Construction of new streets or roads, including sidewalks and bicycle lanes built as part of the new streets or roads. (b) Widening of existing streets or roads with additional traffic lanes. ii. C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(i) Where the addition of traffic lanes results in an alteration of more than 50 percent of the impervious surface of an existing street or road within the project that was not subject to Provision C.3, the entire project, consisting of all existing, new, and/or replaced impervious surfaces, shall be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the entire street or road that had additional traffic lanes added).
(ii) Where the addition of traffic lanes results in an alteration of less than 50 percent of the impervious surface of an existing street or road within the project that was not subject to Provision C.3, only the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from only the new traffic lanes). However, if the stormwater runoff from the existing traffic lanes and the added traffic lanes cannot be separated, any onsite treatment system shall be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the entire street or road. If an offsite treatment system is installed or in-lieu fees paid in accordance with Provision C.3.e, the offsite treatment system or in-lieu fees must address only the stormwater runoff from the added traffic lanes. (c) Construction of impervious9 trails that are greater than or equal to 10 feet wide or are creek-side (within 50 feet of the top of bank). (d) Specific exclusions to Provisions C.3.b.ii.(4)(a)-(c) include the following:
(i) Sidewalks built as part of new streets or roads and built to direct stormwater runoff to adjacent vegetated areas (ii) Bicycle lanes built as part of new streets or roads, but that are not hydraulically connected to the new streets or roads and that direct stormwater runoff to adjacent vegetated areas.
(iii) Impervious trails that direct stormwater runoff to adjacent vegetated areas, or other non-erodible permeable areas, preferably away from creeks or towards the outboard side of levees, where those areas are at least half as large as the contributing impervious surface area. (iv) Sidewalks, bicycle lanes, or trails constructed as pervious pavement systems.10 (v) Caltrans highway projects and associated facilities (5) Road Construction Projects
Road projects that involve the reconstruction of existing streets or roads,11 which create and/or replace greater than or equal to one contiguous8 acre of impervious surface and that are public road projects and/or fall under the building and planning authority of a Permittee, including sidewalks and bicycle lanes that are built or rebuilt as part of the existing streets or roads. This Regulated Project category includes utility trenching projects which are - on average, over the entire length of the project - greater than or equal to 8 feet wide. It also includes public pavement maintenance practices listed in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(b)(iii)(b).

Project activities that are included and excluded, which apply to this category, are listed in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(b)(ii)-(iv). Pavement maintenance practices that are not excluded (as detailed in Provision C.3.b.ii.(1)(b)(iii)) are considered Road Reconstruction Projects if they meet the other definitions therein.(a) Where the reconstruction project results in an alteration of greater than or equal to 50 percent of the impervious surface of an existing street or road within the project that was not subject to Provision C.3, the entire project, consisting of all existing, new, and/or replaced impervious surfaces, shall be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the entire street or road that was reconstructed).
(b) Where the reconstruction project results in an alteration of less than 50 percent of the impervious surface of an existing street or road within the project that was not subject to Provision C.3, only the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from only the new and/or replaced impervious surface within the project footprint). However, if the stormwater runoff from the existing impervious surface and the added impervious surface cannot be separated, any onsite treatment system shall be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the entire street or road. If an offsite treatment system is installed or in-lieu fees paid in accordance with Provision C.3.e, the offsite treatment system or in-lieu fees must address only the stormwater runoff from the added impervious surface.(c ) Road Reconstruction Projects shall comply with Provision C.3.d. However, with cause (e.g., significantly constrained area for a BMP, substantially increased costs for that sizing relative to the Provision C.3.j.i.(2)(g) approach outlined in the Previous Permit, significant amounts of run-on from adjacent areas, or other substantial constraints identified by Permittees) and with reporting in their Annual Reports, Permittees may use the Guidance for Sizing Green Infrastructure Facilities in Streets Projects with companion analysis Green Infrastructure Facility Sizing for Non-Regulated Street Projects submitted in June 2019, to size Road Reconstruction Projects. If so, Permittees must comply with the Water Board’s June 21, 2019, conditional approval of that submittal, which provides qualifiers to, and the conditions under which, the alternative sizing criteria may be used. (d) Permittees may credit the acreage of impervious surface created or replaced for Road Reconstruction Projects towards the Numeric Implementation retrofit requirements specified in Provision C.3.j.ii.(2). (6) Large Detached Single Family Home Projects
Detached single-family home projects that create and/or replace 10,000 ft2 or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site) and are not part of a larger development or redevelopment plan regulated under Provision C.3.b.ii.(2)-(3). (a) Where a single family home project results in an alteration of 50 percent or more of the impervious surface of a previously existing project that was not subject to Provision C.3, the entire project, consisting of all existing, new, and/or replaced impervious surfaces, must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the entire project). ii. C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(b) Where a single family home project results in an alteration of less than 50 percent of the impervious surface of a previously existing project that was not subject to Provision C.3, only the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project must be included in the treatment system design (i.e., stormwater treatment systems must be designed and sized to treat stormwater runoff from the new and/or replaced impervious surface of the project). (c) The calculations in Provision C.3.b.ii.(6)(a)-(b) shall include portions of the public right of way that are developed or redeveloped as part of the Regulated Project.
(d) Included in this Regulated Project category is the addition of an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on an existing parcel with one single- family home, without a subdivision.
iii. Implementation Level C
(1) Provision C.3.b.i shall be effective immediately.
(2) Beginning July 1, 2023, the Regulated Project definitions in Provision C.3.b.ii are effective. (3) Prior to July 1, 2023, the Regulated Project definitions in Provision C.3.b.ii in Attachment I are effective, which are definitions from the Previous Permit. (4) For Provisions C.3.b.iii.(1)-(3), this shall include a database or equivalent tabular format that contains all the information under Reporting (Provision C.3.b.iv.).
iv. Reporting C
(1) C.3.b.i.(2) Reporting
In the 2023 Annual Report, each Permittee shall provide a complete list of the development projects that are subject to the requirements of Provision C.3.b.i.(2). For each such project, the Permittee shall indicate the type of stormwater treatment system required or the specific exemption granted, pursuant to Provision C.3.b.i.(2)(a) and (b). If a Permittee has no projects subject to Provision C.3.b.i.(2), it shall so state in the 2023 Annual Report. (2) Annual Reporting - C.3.B.ii Regulated Projects
For each Regulated Project approved during the fiscal year reporting period, the following information shall be reported electronically in the fiscal year Annual Report, in tabular form (as set forth in the Provision C.3.b. Sample Reporting Table included in Attachment B):
(a) Project Name, Number, Location (cross streets), and Street Address; (b) Name of Developer, Phase No. (if project is being constructed in phases, each phase should have a separate entry), Project Type (e.g., commercial, industrial, multi-unit residential, mixed-use, public), and description; (c) Project watershed;
(d) Total project site area and total area of land disturbed;Project Name, Number, Location (cross streets), and Street Address; (e) Total new impervious surface area and/or total replaced impervious surface area; (f) If redevelopment or road widening project, total pre-project impervious surface area and total post-project impervious surface area;Project Name, Number, Location (cross streets), and Street Address;
(g) Status of project (e.g., application date, application deemed complete date, project approval date), and whether the project has been completed.

If not, the estimated project completion date;Project Name, Number, Location (cross streets), and Street Address; (h) Source Control measures
(i) Site design measures;
(j) All post-construction stormwater treatment systems installed onsite, at a joint stormwater treatment facility, and/or at an offsite location; (k) Operation and maintenance responsibility mechanism for the life of the project;Project Name, Number, Location (cross streets), and Street Address;
(l) Hydraulic Sizing Criteria used;Project Name, Number, Location (cross streets), and Street Address; (m) Alternative compliance measures for Regulated Project (if applicable) (i) If alternative compliance will be provided at an offsite location in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(1), include information  required in Provision C.3.b.iv.(2)(a) – (l) for the offsite project; and (ii) If alternative compliance will be provided by paying in-lieu fees in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(2), provide information required in Provision C.3.b.iv.(2)(a) – (l) for the Regional Project. Additionally, provide a summary of the Regional Project’s goals, duration, estimated completion date, total estimated cost of the Regional Project, and estimated monetary contribution from the Regulated Project to the Regional Project; and ii. C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(n) Hydromodification (HM) Controls (see Provision C.3.g) – If not required, state why not. If required, state control method used.

C.3.c  Low Impact Development (LID) C
The goal of LID is to reduce runoff and mimic a site’s predevelopment hydrology by minimizing disturbed areas and impervious cover and then infiltrating, storing, detaining, evapotranspiring, and/or biotreating stormwater runoff close to its source. LID employs principles such as preserving and recreating natural landscape features and minimizing imperviousness to create functional and appealing site drainage that treats stormwater as a resource, rather than a waste product. Practices used to adhere to these LID principles include measures such as rain barrels and cisterns, green roofs, permeable pavement, preserving undeveloped open space, and biotreatment through rain gardens, bioretention units, bioswales, and planter/tree boxes.i. Task Description - The Permittees shall, at a minimum, implement the following LID requirements: C (1 ) Source Control Requirements
Require all Regulated Projects to implement source control measures onsite that, at a minimum, shall include the following:
(a) Minimization of stormwater pollutants of concern in urban runoff through measures that may include plumbing of the following discharges to the sanitary sewer, subject to the local sanitary sewer agency’s regulations and standards:
-  Discharges from indoor floor mat/equipment/hood filter wash racks or covered outdoor wash racks for restaurants; -  Dumpster drips from covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures; -  Discharges from covered outdoor wash areas for vehicles, equipment, and accessories; -  Swimming pool water, if discharge to onsite vegetated areas is not a feasible option; and -  Fire sprinkler test water, if discharge to onsite vegetated areas is not a feasible option; (b) Properly designed covers, drains, and storage precautions for outdoor material storage areas, loading docks, repair/maintenance bays, and fueling areas;
(c) Properly designed trash storage areas;
(d) Landscaping that minimizes irrigation and runoff, promotes surface infiltration, minimizes the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and incorporates other appropriate sustainable landscaping practices and programs such as Bay-Friendly Landscaping; (e) Efficient irrigation systems; and
(f)  Storm drain system stenciling or signage.
(2) Site Design and Stormwater Treatment Requirements
(a) Require each Regulated Project to implement at least the following design strategies onsite:
(i) Limit disturbance of natural water bodies and drainage systems; minimize compaction of highly permeable soils; protect slopes and channels; and minimize impacts from stormwater and urban runoff on the biological integrity of natural drainage systems and water bodies; (ii) Conserve natural areas, including existing trees, other vegetation, and soils; (iii) Minimize impervious surfaces;
(iv) Minimize disturbances to natural drainages; and
(v) Minimize stormwater runoff by implementing one or more of the following site design measures:
- Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse. -  Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas.
- Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. -  Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas. -  Construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with pervious pavement systems. - Construct driveways, bike lanes, and/or uncovered parking lots with pervious pavement systems. (b) Permittees shall shall implement the design specifications for pervious pavement systems contained within their stormwater handbooks. (c) Require each Regulated Project to treat 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures onsite or with LID treatment measures at a joint stormwater treatment facility. (i) LID treatment measures are harvesting and use, infiltration, evapotranspiration, and biotreatment. iv. C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(ii) Biotreatment (or bioretention) systems shall be designed to have a surface area no smaller than what is required to accommodate a 5 inches/hour stormwater runoff surface loading rate, infiltrate runoff through biotreatment soil media at a minimum of 5 inches per hour, and maximize infiltration to the native soil during the life of the Regulated Project. The soil media for biotreatment (or bioretention) systems shall be designed to sustain healthy, vigorous plant growth and maximize stormwater runoff retention and pollutant removal. Permittees shall ensure that Regulated Projects use biotreatment soil media that meet the minimum specifications set forth in the Revised Model Biotreatment Soil Media Specifications submitted by BASMAA on behalf of the Permittees on February 5, 2016, and approved on April 18, 2016, pursuant to the requirements of Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(ii) of MRP2. Permittees may collectively (on an all-Permittee scale or countywide scale) develop and adopt revisions to the soil media minimum specifications, subject to the Executive Officer’s approval.
a. The Permittees may convene a workgroup with Water Board staff to discuss and investigate the pollutant removal effectiveness and hydrologic equivalency of – and suggested criteria for – high flow-rate media treatment systems in combination with retention/detention measures, such as silva cells and structural soils, as compared to conventional bioretention. The workgroup should consider issues including: the MEP standard in relation to the use of such systems; the pollutant removal benefits and hydrologic criteria associated with the Permit's LID design approach and which are included in other MS4 permits, such as the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (NPDES Permit No.

WAR045717) and the Los Angeles Regional MS4 Permit (NPDES Permit No. CAS004004); and additional issues, such as the feasibility of obtaining high flow rate media at construction and, as needed, for the life of a project. (iii)  Alternative Treatment Systems
Permittees may allow a Regulated Project to comply with the Provision C.3.d design volume and/or flow requirement for the approved portion (Approved Portion)  using an alternative treatment system (i.e., onsite non-LID treatment systems (e.g., media filters) in combination with systems providing flow control benefit), as follows:
a. Alternative treatment systems may be implemented in the following two geographic areas, as identified in a Countywide Hydromodification Applicability Map accepted by the Executive Officer:

1.Area draining to channels that are hardened continuously from the point of discharge into the channel to San Francisco Bay or to the Pacific Ocean; and

2. Areas draining directly into the Bay, the Ocean, or channels that are tidally influenced at the point of discharge into the channel. Before a Permittee may implement alternative treatment systems, the Permittee shall, among other requirements in this Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(iii), re-submit the applicable portions of its respective Countywide Hydromodification Applicability Map to accurately identify the two geographic areas described above and the resubmitted applicable portions of the map must be accepted by the Executive Officer as accurate. b.Alternative treatment systems in the two geographic areas listed in Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(iii)a must have an active General Use Level Designation certification for Enhanced Treatment from the Washington State Department of Ecology’s Technology Assessment Protocol – Ecology (TAPE) Program.14 c. Implementation of alternative treatment systems requires a Demonstration of Technical Infeasibility  that has been submitted by the Permittee to the Water Board and approved by the Executive Officer for each Regulated Project where an alternative treatment system is proposed. Permittees shall include the following documentation in the Demonstration of Technical Infeasibility:

1. The technical constraints (spatial, utility, or other) to treating 100 percent of the Provision C.3.d design volume and/or flow onsite and offsite using LID and that the Regulated Project maximizes LID treatment within those constraints. This must include an assessment of the technical feasibility of incorporating all potential types and configurations of LID, including, but not limited to, the following: runoff capture and use, suspended pavement systems with the approved biotreatment soil media (e.g., Silva cells), bioretention, green roofs, pervious pavement systems, and infiltration galleries. For onsite technical infeasibility, a demonstration that the Regulated Project will implement LID in or on all potential or actual onsite landscaping opportunities  and that there are no potential or actual onsite landscaping opportunities in or on which LID will not be implemented. For offsite technical infeasibility, demonstration that there are no opportunities to implement  an equivalent amount of LID in the adjacent or nearby public right of way (ROW) for the Regulated Project; elsewhere in the Permittee’s jurisdiction (including opportunities identified in the Permittee’s GI Plan); and elsewhere in the same county (including opportunities identified in the GI Plans of other Permittees in the county).

2. That the alternative treatment system includes flow controls that, based on monitoring and/or field studies, provide flow control benefit commensurate to the flow control benefit of LID measures had they been implemented for the project.

At a minimum, this shall include consideration of vertical infiltration into soils (including soils with low infiltration rates), horizontal infiltration, evapotranspiration, and the effect of inter-event periods on antecedent soil conditions. In places where infiltration is not allowed because of permanent high groundwater (i.e., less than 10 feet below the surface) or documented existing significant soil and groundwater contamination, flow control benefits may be compared to those from lined bioretention cells. e. Implementation – Permittees may implement Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(iii) after they have collectively submitted a Regional Guidance Document to facilitate Permittees’ compliance with the Demonstration of Technical Infeasibility and with the Demonstration of Commensurate Benefit and the Executive Officer has approved the Regional Guidance Document.At a minimum, the Permittees shall include the following in the Regional Guidance Document:   1.Regional guidance to ensure that Permittees and projects seeking to use alternative treatment systems comply with the requirements for the Demonstrations of Technical Infeasibility and Commensurate Benefit set forth in Provisions C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(iii)c-d;

2.Review of data from monitoring and/or field studies, and guidance on the use of that data sufficient to demonstrate commensurate benefit; i. C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

3.Guidance on how the Demonstrations of Technical Infeasibility and Commensurate Benefit apply to different types of projects; and

4. How Permittees will incorporate assessment of technical infeasibility and commensurate benefit into the early stages of their municipal planning processes.

If the Permittees choose to submit a Regional Guidance Document, they must do so on or before the deadline set forth in Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(iii)f.2.

The Regional Guidance Document is subject to the approval of the Executive Officer. If the Executive Officer determines that the Regional Guidance Document is sufficiently detailed to enable Permittee review of Demonstrations of Technical Infeasibility and Commensurate Benefits for Regulated Projects on a consistent, objective, and rigorous basis, the Executive Officer may, in the approval of the Regional Guidance Document, allow Permittee approval of the Demonstration of Technical Infeasibility and of the Demonstration of Commensurate Benefit for Regulated Projects in lieu of the requirement for Executive Officer approval of both demonstrations, contingent on Permittees implementing the approved Regional Guidance Document for those Regulated Projects.f. Reporting

1.In each Annual Report, Permittees shall provide the following information for each Regulated Project that is implementing Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(iii):
the final percentage of LID treatment and non-LID treatment and all other information reported for Regulated Projects pursuant to Provision C.3.b.iv.

2. If the Permittees choose to submit the Regional Guidance Document—which is a prerequisite to their implementation of Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(c)(iii)—it shall be submitted no later than with the 2025 Annual Reports. (iv) Green roofs may be considered biotreatment systems that treat roof runoff only if they meet certain minimum specifications. Permittees shall ensure that green roofs installed at Regulated Projects meet the following minimum specifications:
a. The green roof system planting media shall be sufficiently deep to provide capacity within the pore space of the media for the required runoff volume specified by Provision C.3.d.i.(1).
b.The green roof system planting media shall be sufficiently deep to support the long-term health of the vegetation selected for the green roof, as specified by a landscape architect or other knowledgeable professional. ii. Reporting
(1) For specific tasks listed above that are reported using the reporting tables required for Provision C.3.b.iv, a reference to those tables will suffice.

C.3.d.  Numeric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems C i Task Description – The Permittees shall require that stormwater treatment systems constructed for Regulated Projects and for projects implemented pursuant to Provision C.3.j meet at least one of the following hydraulic sizing design criteria:
(1) Volume Hydraulic Design Basis – Treatment systems whose primary mode of action depends on volume capacity shall be designed to treat stormwater runoff equal to:
(a) The maximized stormwater capture volume for the area, on the basis of historical rainfall records, determined using the formula and volume capture coefficients set forth in Urban Runoff Quality Management, WEF Manual of Practice No. 23/ASCE Manual of Practice No. 87, (1998), pages 175–178 (e.g., approximately the 85th percentile 24-hour storm runoff event); or (b) The volume of annual runoff required to achieve 80 percent or more capture, determined in accordance with the methodology set forth in Section 5 of CASQA’s Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook, New Development and Redevelopment (2003), using local rainfall data. (2) Flow Hydraulic Design Basis – Treatment systems whose primary mode of action depends on flow capacity shall be sized to treat:
(a) 10 percent of the 50-year peak flow rate;
(b) The flow of runoff produced by a rain event equal to at least two times the 85th percentile hourly rainfall intensity for the applicable area, based on historical records of hourly rainfall depths; or
(c) The flow of runoff resulting from a rain event equal to at least 0.2  inches per hour intensity. (3) Combination Flow and Volume Design Basis – Treatment systems that use a combination of flow and volume capacity shall be sized to treat at least 80 percent of the total runoff over the life of the project, using local rainfall data.ii. Reporting – Permittees shall use the reporting tables required in Provision C.3.b.iv.(2) iii.  Limitations on Use of Infiltration Devices in Stormwater Treatment Systems (1) For Regulated Projects and for all projects implemented pursuant to Provision C.3.j, each Permittee shall review planned land use and proposed treatment design to verify that installed stormwater treatment systems with no under-drain, and that function primarily as infiltration devices, should not cause or contribute to the degradation of groundwater quality at project sites. An infiltration device is any structure that is designed to infiltrate stormwater into the subsurface and, as designed, bypass the natural groundwater protection afforded by surface soil. Infiltration devices include dry wells, injection wells, and infiltration trenches (includes french drains). (2) For any Regulated Project and for any project implemented pursuant to Provision C.3.j that includes plans to install stormwater treatment systems which function primarily as infiltration devices, the Permittee shall require that:
(a) Appropriate pollution prevention and source control measures are implemented to protect groundwater at the project site, including the inclusion of a minimum of two feet of suitable soil to achieve a maximum 5 inches/hour infiltration rate for the infiltration system; (b) Adequate maintenance is provided to maximize pollutant removal capabilities; i. C
SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(c) The vertical distance from the base of any infiltration device to the seasonal high groundwater mark is at least 10 feet. (Note that some locations within the Permittees’ jurisdictions are characterized by highly porous soils and/or high groundwater tables. In these areas, a greater vertical distance from the base of the infiltration device to the seasonal high groundwater mark may be appropriate, and treatment system approvals should be subject to a higher level of analysis that considers the potential for pollutants (such as from onsite chemical use), the level of pretreatment to be achieved, and other similar factors in the overall analysis of groundwater safety); (d) Unless stormwater is first treated by a method other than infiltration, infiltration devices are not approved as treatment measures for runoff from areas of industrial or light industrial activity; areas subject to high vehicular traffic (i.e., 25,000 or greater average daily traffic on a main roadway or 15,000 or more average daily traffic on any intersecting roadway); automotive repair shops; car washes; fleet storage areas (e.g., bus, truck); nurseries; and other land uses that pose a high threat to water quality; (e) Infiltration devices are not placed in the vicinity of known contamination sites unless it has been demonstrated that increased infiltration will not increase leaching of contaminants from soil, alter groundwater flow conditions affecting contaminant migration in groundwater, or adversely affect remedial activities; and      (f) Infiltration devices are located a minimum of 100 feet horizontally away from any known water supply wells, septic systems, and underground storage tanks with hazardous materials.  (Note that some locations within the Permittees’ jurisdictions are characterized by highly porous soils and/or high groundwater tables. In these areas, a greater horizontal distance from the infiltration device to known water supply wells, septic systems, or underground storage tanks with hazardous materials may be appropriate, and treatment system approvals should be subject to a higher level of analysis that considers the potential for pollutants (such as from onsite chemical use), the level of pretreatment to be achieved, and other similar factors in the overall analysis of groundwater safety).iv. Tree Runoff Reduction and Tree -Based Stormwater Treatment Systems (1) The Permittees collectively may submit a proposal, subject to the Executive Officer’s approval, which evaluates the benefit and associated criteria of runoff reduction associated with trees with respect to treatment control sizing, which evaluates and includes as appropriate the findings of the Healthy Watersheds, Resilient Baylands project,13 and which will be considered for incorporation into a subsequent Permit. Such a proposal shall characterize the multiple benefits of green infrastructure beyond standard designs (e.g., urban forestry), develop recommendations for Permittees to achieve the benefits (e.g., beneficial modifications to GI designs, guidelines for coordinating with work such as stream restoration, parks and urban forestry), and suggest opportunities to modify Provision C.3 language in a future Permit to better recognize broader benefits.The proposal may include treatment control sizing and design criteria for tree-based stormwater treatment systems in combination with systems that provide additional hydrologic benefit (such as structural soils, suspended pavement systems, or other methods to provide tree rooting volume), which provide water quality and hydrologic benefit equivalent to bioretention.   (2) Tree Interceptor Credits, as described in the 2011 BASMAA Feasibility/Infeasibility Criteria Report submitted pursuant to Provision C.3.c.i.(2)(b)(iv) of MRP 1, shall not be used to reduce the stormwater treatment required pursuant to Provision C.3.

C.3.e. Alternative or In-Lieu Compliance with Provision C.3.b. C i The Permittees may allow a Regulated Project to provide alternative compliance with Provision C.3.b in accordance with one of the two options listed below:
(1) Option 1:  LID Treatment at an Offsite Location
Treat a portion (this portion may be zero; Permittees should treat as much onsite as possible) of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures onsite or with LID treatment measures at a joint stormwater treatment facility and treat the remaining portion of the Provision C.3.d runoff with LID treatment measures at an Offsite Project14 in the same watershed. The offsite LID treatment measures must provide hydraulically-sized treatment (in accordance with Provisions C.3.d and C.3.g, as appropriate) of an equivalent quantity of both stormwater runoff and pollutant loading and achieve a net environmental benefit. (2) Option 2: Payment of In-Lieu Fees
Treat a portion (this portion may be zero; Permittees should treat as much onsite as possible) of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures onsite or with LID treatment measures at a joint stormwater treatment facility and pay equivalent in-lieu fees15 to treat the remaining portion of the ProvisionC.3.d runoff (and comply with Provision C.3.g, as appropriate) with LID treatment measures at a Regional Project16 or Offsite Project. The Regional Project must achieve a net environmental benefit, through a net increase in impervious surface treated, and/or a net reduction in flow and/or pollutant load. (3) For the alternative compliance options described in Provision C.3.e.i.(1) and (2) above (Options 1 and 2), all Offsite Projects and Regional Projects must be completed within three years after the end of construction of the Regulated Project. However, the timeline for completion of an Offsite Project or Regional Project may be extended, up to five years after the completion of the Regulated Project, with prior Executive Officer approval. Executive Officer approval will be granted contingent upon a demonstration of good faith efforts to implement the Offsite Project or Regional Project, such as having funds encumbered and applying for the appropriate regulatory permits. (4) Reporting
(a) Annual reporting on Alternative Compliance projects shall be done in conjunction with reporting requirements under Provision C.3.b.iv.(2). ii. Special Projects
C
iii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(1) When considered at the watershed scale, certain land development projects characterized as smart growth or high density can either reduce existing impervious surfaces or create less “accessory” impervious areas and automobile-related pollutant impacts. Incentive LID Treatment Reduction Credits approved by the Water Board may be applied to these Special Projects, which are Regulated Projects that meet the specific criteria listed below in Provision C.3.e.ii.(2). For any Special Project, the allowable incentive LID Treatment Reduction Credit is the maximum percentage of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Special Project’s drainage area that may be treated with one or a combination of the following two types of non-LID treatment systems:
- Tree-box-type high flowrate biofilters
C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

- Vault-based high flowrate media filters
The allowed LID Treatment Reduction Credit recognizes that density and space limitations for the Special Projects identified herein may make 100% LID treatment infeasible.
(2) Prior to granting any LID Treatment Reduction Credits, Permittees must first establish all the following:
(a) The infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures onsite;
(b) The infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures offsite or paying in-lieu fees to treat 100% of the Provision C.3.d runoff with LID treatment measures at an offsite or Regional Project; and (c) The infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with some combination of LID treatment measures onsite, offsite, and/or paying in-lieu fees towards at an offsite or Regional Project. For each Special Project, a Permittee shall document the basis of infeasibility used to establish technical and/or economic infeasibility. Under Provision C.3.e.v, each Permittee is required to report on the infeasibility of 100% LID treatment in each scenario described in Provision C.3.e.ii.(2)(a)-(c) above, for each of the Special Projects for which LID Treatment Reduction Credit was applied. (3) Category A Special Project Criteria
(a) To be considered a Category A Special Project, a Regulated Project must meet all of the following criteria:
(i) Be built as part of a Permittee’s stated objective to preserve or enhance a pedestrian-oriented type of urban design. (ii) Be located in a Permittee’s designated central business district, downtown core area or downtown core zoning district, neighborhood business district or comparable pedestrian-oriented commercial district, or historic preservation site and/or district. (iii) Create and/or replace one half acre or less of impervious surface area. (iv) Include no surface parking, except for incidental surface parking. Incidental surface parking is allowed only for emergency vehicle access, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility,  and passenger and freight loading zones. (v) Have at least 85% coverage for the entire project site by permanent structures.  The remaining 15% portion of the site is to be used for safety access, parking structure entrances, trash and recycling service, utility access, pedestrian connections, public uses, landscaping, and stormwater treatment.
(b) Any Category A Special Project may qualify for 100% LID Treatment Reduction Credit, which would allow the Category A Special Project to treat up to 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1).
(4) Category B Special Project Criteria
(a) To be considered a Category B Special Project, a Regulated Project must meet all of the following criteria:
(i) Be built as part of a Permittee’s stated objective to preserve or enhance a pedestrian-oriented type of urban design. (ii) Be located in a Permittee’s designated central business district, downtown core area or downtown core zoning district, neighborhood business district or comparable pedestrian- oriented commercial district, or historic preservation site and/or district.      (iii) Create and/or replace greater than one-half acre but no more than 2 acres of impervious surface area. (iv) Include no surface parking, except for incidental surface parking. Incidental surface parking is allowed only for emergency vehicle access, ADA accessibility, and passenger and freight loading zones. (v) Have at least 85% coverage for the entire project site by permanent structures.  The remaining 15% portion of the site is to be used for safety access, parking structure entrances, trash and recycling service, utility access, pedestrian connections, public uses, landscaping, and stormwater treatment.
(b) Any Category A Special Project may qualify for 100 percent LID Treatment Reduction Credit, which would allow the Category A Special Project to treat up to 100 percent of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1). (4) Category B Special Project Criteria
(a) To be considered a Category B Special Project, a Regulated Project must meet all of the following criteria:
(i) Be built as part of a Permittee’s stated objective to preserve or enhance a pedestrian-oriented type of urban design. (ii) Be located in a Permittee’s designated central business district, downtown core area or downtown core zoning district, neighborhood business district or comparable pedestrian-oriented commercial district, or historic preservation site and/or district. (iii) Create and/or replace greater than one-half acre but no more than 2 acres of impervious surface area. (iv) Include no surface parking, except for incidental surface parking.  Incidental surface parking is allowed only for emergency vehicle access, ADA accessibility, and passenger and freight loading zones. (v) Have at least 85 percent coverage for the entire project site by permanent structures. The remaining 15 percent portion of the site is to be used for safety access, parking structure entrances, trash and recycling service, utility access, pedestrian connections, public uses, landscaping, and stormwater treatment.

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(b) For any Category B Special Project, the maximum LID Treatment Reduction Credit allowed is determined based on the density achieved by the Project in accordance with the criteria listed below. Density is expressed in Floor Area Ratios (FARs ) for commercial development projects, in Dwelling Units  per Acre (DU/Ac) for residential development projects, and in FARs and DU/Ac for mixed-use development projects. (i) 50 percent Maximum LID Treatment Reduction Credit
(a) For any commercial Category B Special Project with an FAR of at least 2:1, up to 50% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1). (b) For any residential Category B Special Project with a gross density24 of at least 50 DU/Ac, up to 50 percent of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above.
(c) For any mixed use Category B Special Project with an FAR of at least 2:1 or a gross density of at least 50 DU/Ac, up to 50 percent of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above. (ii) 75% Maximum LID Treatment Reduction Credit
a. For any commercial Category B Special Project with an FAR of at least 3:1, up to 75 percent of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above.
b. For any residential Category B Special Project with a gross density of at least 75 DU/Ac, up to 75 percent of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above.
c. For any mixed-use Category B Special Project with an FAR of at least 3:1 or a gross density of at least 75 DU/Ac, up to 75 percent of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above. (iii) 100% Maximum LID Treatment Reduction Credit
(a) For any commercial Category B Special Project with an FAR of at least 4:1, up to 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above.
(b) For any residential Category B Special Project with a gross density of at least 100 DU/Ac, up to 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.#.d for the Project's drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above.
(c) For any mixed use Category B Special Project with an FAR of at least 4:1 or a gross density of at least 100 DU/Ac, up to 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area may be treated with either one or a combination of the two types of non-LID treatment systems listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1) above. (5) Category C Special Project Criteria (Affordable Housing) (a) For the purposes of attributing Affordable Housing Credits, affordable housing is defined as preserved housing with deed restrictions running at least 55 years, at rent/mortgage rates (including utilities) no greater than 30 percent of the area median household income (AMI) limits adjusted for household size based on the maximum percentage of AMI for each income category, which are defined by the Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for affordable housing in metropolitan areas as follows: Acutely Low household incomes as 0-15 percent of AMI, Extremely Low household incomes as 16-30 percent of AMI, Very Low household incomes as 31-50 percent of AMI, Low household incomes as 51-80 percent of AMI, and Moderate household incomes as 81-120 percent of AMI.25  To be considered a Category C Special Project, a Regulated Project must additionally meet both of the following      (i) Be primarily a residential development project,26 and (ii) Achieve at least a gross density of 40 DU/Ac.
(b) For any Category C Special Project, the total maximum LID Treatment Reduction Credit allowed is the sum of four different types of credits that the Category C Special Project may qualify for, namely: Affordable Housing, Location, Density, and Minimized Surface Parking Credits. The total maximum LID Treatment Reduction Credit for any Category C Special Project may not exceed 100 percent. (c) Affordable Housing Credits: A Category C Special Project may qualify for Affordable Housing Credits, according to the following criteria. The income limits that shall be used for these criteria are the most current Official State Income Limits (adjusted for household size, and specific to each county), which are defined on the California Department of Housing and Community Development’s website.27, 28  All qualifying affordable housing DUs must be preserved housing with deed restrictions running at least 55 years, at rent/mortgage rates (including utilities) no greater than 30 percent of the total household income. In each Category C Special Project, up to three DUs that are used as building manager’s DUs may be exempted from the deed restriction requirement and may be excluded from the calculations described below in Provision C.3.e.ii.(5)(c)(i)-(ii). The following two steps shall be used to calculate Affordable Housing Credits:    (i) First, the percentage of the project’s DUs in each affordability category are multiplied by the respective credit multipliers, according to the table below, and rounded to the nearest whole number.

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(ii) Second, , the credits generated from the table above in the first step in Provision C.3.e.ii.(5)(c)(i) are summed together to produce a weighted sum and rounded to the nearest whole number. Then Affordable Housing Credit is granted according to which weighted sum range (in the table below) that whole number (X) falls into:
(d) Location Credits: To qualify for any Location Credits, a Category C Special Project must first qualify for one of the Affordable Housing Credits in Provision C.3.e.ii.(5)(c).
(i) A Category C Special Project may qualify for the following Location Credits:
(d) Location Credits: To qualify for any Location Credits, a Category C Special Project must first qualify for one of the Affordable Housing Credits in Provision C.3.e.ii.(5)(c).
(i) A Category C Special Project may qualify for the following Location Credits:
a. 5 percent Location Credit: Located within a ¼-mile radius of an existing or planned transit hub. b. 10 percent Location Credit: Located within a planned Priority Development Area (PDA), which is an infill development area formally designated by the Association of Bay Area Government’s/Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s FOCUS regional planning program. FOCUS is a regional incentive-based development and conservation strategy for the San Francisco Bay Area. (ii) Only one Location Credit may be used by an individual Category C Special Project, even if the project qualifies for multiple Location Credits. (iii) One hundred percent of a Category C Special Project’s site must be located within the ¼-mile radius of an existing or planned transit hub to qualify for the corresponding Location Credit listed above. One hundred percent of a Category C Special Project’s site must be located within a PDA to qualify for the corresponding Location Credit listed above.
(iv) Transit Dens
(e) Density Credits:  To qualify for any Density Credits, a Category C Special Project must first qualify for one of the Location Credits listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(5)( c) .
(i) A Category C Special Project that is a commercial or mixed-use development project may qualify for the following Density Credits:

a. 5% Density Credit: Achieve a gross density of at least 40 DU/Ac b. 10% Density Credit: Achieve a gross density of at least 60 DU/Ac c. 15 percent Density Credit: Achieve a gross density of at least 100 DU/Ac. (ii) Only one Density Credit may be used by an individual Category C Special Project, even if the project qualifies for multiple Density Credits.

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(f) Minimized Surface Parking Credits: To qualify for any Minimized Surface Parking Credits, a Category C Special Project must first qualify for one of the Location Credits listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(5) (c ) . (i) A Category C Special Project may qualify for the following Minimized Surface Parking Credits:

(a) 5% Minimized Surface Parking Credit: Have no surface parking except for incidental surface parking. Incidental surface parking is allowed only for emergency vehicle access, ADA accessibility, and passenger and freight loading zones. (g) Category C Special Projects receiving final discretionary approval prior to July 1, 2022, may use the Category C Special Project criteria included in the Previous Permit.
(6) Any Regulated Project that meets all the criteria for multiple Special Projects Categories (i.e., a Regulated Project that may be characterized as a Category B or C Special Project) may only use the LID Treatment Reduction Credit allowed under one of the Special Projects Categories (i.e., a Regulated Project that may be characterized as a Category B or C Special Project may use the LID Treatment Reduction Credit allowed under Category B or Category C, but not the sum of both.).
iii. Implementation Level
(1) Provisions C.3.e.i-ii supersede any Alternative Compliance Policies previously approved by the Executive Officer. (2) For all offsite projects and Regional Projects installed in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i-ii, the Permittees shall meet the Operation & Maintenance (O&M) requirements of Provision C.3.h.
(3)  Prior to July 1, 2023, Permittees shall implement Provision C.3.e.ii in Attachment I, which are requirements from the Previous Permit. (4) Beginning July 1, 2023, Permittees shall implement Provision C.3.e.ii. iv. Reporting – Annual reporting shall be done in conjunction with reporting requirements under Provision C.3.b.iv.(2).

Any Permittee choosing to require 100% LID treatment onsite for all Regulated Projects and not allow alternative compliance under Provision C.3.e, shall include a statement to that effect in each Annual Report. v.  Reporting on Special Projects
(1) Permittees shall track any identified potential Special Projects, including those projects that have submitted planning applications but that have not received final discretionary approval.
(2) In each Annual Report, Permittees shall report to the Water Board on these tracked potential Special Projects using Table 3.1 found at the end of Provision C.3. All the required column entry information listed in Table 3.1 shall be reported for each potential Special Project. Any Permittee with no Special Projects shall so state. For each Special Project listed in Table 3.1, Permittees shall include a narrative discussion of the feasibility or infeasibility of 100% LID treatment onsite, offsite, and at a Regional Project. The narrative discussion shall address each of the following:
(a) The infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures onsite.
(b) The infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with LID treatment measures offsite or paying in-lieu fees to treat 100% of the Provision C.3.d runoff with LID treatment measures at a Regional Project. (c) The infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d for the Regulated Project’s drainage area with some combination of LID treatment measures onsite, offsite, and/or paying in-lieu fees towards a Regional Project. Both technical and economic feasibility or infeasibility shall be discussed, as applicable. The discussion shall also contain enough technical and/or economic detail to document the basis of infeasibility used.
(3) Once a Special Project has final discretionary approval, it shall be reported in the Provision C.3.b. Reporting Table in the same reporting year that the project was approved. In addition to the column entries contained in the Provision C.3.b. Reporting Table in the same reporting year that the project was approved. In addition to the column entries contained in the Provision C.3.b. Reporting Table, the Permittees shall provide the following supplemental information for each approved Special Project:
(a) Submittal Date: Date that a planning application for the Special Project was submitted. (b) Description: Type of project, number of floors, number of units (commercial, mixed-use, residential), type of parking, and other relevant information.   (c) Site Acreage: Total site area in acres. (d) Total Impervious Surface Created/Replaced: The total impervious surface in acres created or replaced by the project, which is subject to the treatment requirements listed in Provision C.3.e.ii.(1). (e) Gross Density in DU/Ac: Number of dwelling units per acre. (f) Category C Projects: Number of DUs in each AMI Category: For Category C Special Projects only, the number of preserved DUs (DUs with deed restrictions running at least 55 years) that have rent/mortgage rates (including utilities) no less than 30 percent of the Moderate, Low, Very Low, and Extremely Low area median household income levels specified in Provision C.3.e.ii.(5)(c). (g) Density in FAR: Floor Area Ratio.
(h) Special Project Category: For each applicable Special Project Category, list the specific criteria applied to determine applicability. For each non- applicable Special Project Category, indicate n/a.

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(i) LID Treatment Reduction Credit: For each applicable Special Project Category, state the maximum total LID Treatment Reduction Credit applied. For Category C Special Projects also list the individual Affordable Housing, Location, Density, and Minimized Surface Parking Credits applied. (j) Stormwater Treatment Systems: List all proposed stormwater treatment systems and the corresponding percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Project’s drainage area that will be treated by each treatment system. (k) List of Non-LID Stormwater Treatment Systems: List all non-LID stormwater treatment systems approved. For each type of non-LID treatment system, indicate: (1) the percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Special Project's drainage area, and (2) whether the treatment system either meets minimum design criteria published by a government agency or received certification issued by a government agency, and reference the applicable criteria or certification.

C.3.f.  Alternative Certification of Stormwater Treatment Systems C i. Task Description – In lieu of reviewing a Regulated Project’s adherence to Provision C.3.d, a Permittee may elect to have a third party conduct detailed review and certify the Regulated Project’s adherence to Provision C.3.d. The third party reviewer must be a Civil Engineer or a Licensed Architect or Landscape Architect registered in the State of California or staff of another Permittee subject to the requirements of this Permit. ii.  Implementation Level – Any Permittee accepting third-party reviews must make a reasonable effort to ensure that the third party has no conflict of interest with regard to the Regulated Project in question. That is, any consultant or contractor (or his/her employees) hired to design and/or construct a stormwater treatment system for a Regulated Project shall not also be the certifying third party. The Permittee must verify that the third party certifying any Regulated Project has current training on stormwater treatment system design (within three years of the certification signature date) for water quality and understands the groundwater protection principles applicable to Regulated Project sites. Training conducted by an organization with stormwater treatment system design expertise (such as a college or university, the American Society of Civil Engineers, American Society of Landscape Architects, American Public Works Association, California Water Environment Association (CWEA), BASMAA, National Association of Flood & Stormwater Management Agencies, CASQA, or the equivalent, may be considered qualifying training. iii. Reporting – Projects reviewed by third parties shall be noted in reporting tables for Provision C.3.b.

C.3.g.  Hydromodification Management C
i. Hydromodification Management (HM) Projects are Regulated Projects that create and/or replace one acre or more of impervious surface except where one of the following applies.  All HM Projects shall meet the Hydromodification Management Standard of Provision C.3.g.ii. (1) The post-project impervious surface area is less than, or the same as, the pre-project impervious surface area. (2) The project is located in a catchment that drains to a hardened (e.g., continuously lined with concrete) engineered channel or channels or enclosed pipes that extend continuously to the Bay, Delta, or flow- controlled reservoir, or drains to channels that are tidally influenced. (3) The project is located in a catchment or subwatershed that is highly developed (i.e., that is 70% or more impervious).30 All HM Projects shall meet the HM Standard of either Provision C.3.g.ii or Provision C.3.g.iii. The Hydromodification Applicability Maps developed by the Permittees in the Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Fairfield-Suisun Programs, and the City of Vallejo, under Order No. R2-2009-0074 remain in effect and are provided in Attachment C to this Permit. Permittees that do not have the location-based applicability criteria (Provision C.3.g.i.(2) – (3)) shown on existing maps shall develop, or cause to be developed, new maps, overlays to existing maps, or other equivalent information that demonstrates whether a project falls under one of those two criteria (whether or not areas are subject to HM requirements). Such maps, overlays, or other equivalent information shall be acceptable to the Executive Officer and shall not be effective until accepted by the Executive Officer. ii.  HM Standard
Stormwater discharges from HM Projects shall not cause an increase in the erosion potential of the receiving stream over the pre-project (existing) condition. Increases in runoff flow and volume shall be managed so that post-project runoff shall not exceed estimated pre-project rates and durations, where such increased flow and/or volume is likely to cause increased potential for erosion of creek beds and banks, silt pollutant generation, or other adverse impacts on beneficial uses due to increased erosive force. The demonstration that post-project stormwater runoff does not exceed estimated pre-project runoff rates and durations shall include the following:
(1) Range of Flows to Control: FFor Alameda, Contra Costa, San Mateo, and Santa Clara Permittees, and the City of Vallejo, HM controls shall be designed such that post-project stormwater discharge rates and durations match pre-project discharge rates and durations from 10 percent of the pre-project 2- year peak flow24 up to the pre-project 10-year peak flow. For Fairfield-Suisun Permittees, HM controls shall be designed such that post- project stormwater discharge rates and durations shall match from 20 percent of the 2-year peak flow up to the pre-project 10-year peak flow. (2) Goodness of Fit Criteria: The post-project flow duration curve shall not deviate above the pre-project flow duration curve by more than 10 percent over more than 10 percent of the length of the curve corresponding to the range of flows to control.

C
v.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(3) Standard HM Modeling: Permittees shall use, or shall cause to be used, a continuous simulation hydrologic computer model to simulate pre-project and post-project runoff, or sizing factors or charts developed using such a model, to design onsite or regional HM controls. The Permittees shall compare, or shall cause to be compared, the pre-project and post-project model output for a long-term rainfall record and shall show that applicable performance criteria in C.3.g.ii.(1)-(3) above are met. HM controls designed using the Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM) and site-specific input data shall be considered to meet the HM Standard. Such use must be consistent with directions and options set forth in the most current BAHM User Manual.

Modifications to the BAHM shall be acceptable to the Executive Officer, shall be consistent with the requirements of this Provision, and shall be reported as required below:
- Precipitation Data: Precipitation data used in the modeling of HM controls shall, at a minimum, be 30 years of hourly rainfall data representative of the area being modeled. Where a longer rainfall record is available, the longer record shall be used. - Calculating Post-Project Runoff: Retention and detention basins shall be considered impervious surfaces for purposes of calculating post-project runoff. Pre- and post-project runoff shall be calculated and compared for the entire site, without separating or excluding areas that may be considered self-retaining.iii. HM Standard – Direct Simulation of Erosion Potential HM control shall be achieved by maintaining the erosion potential in receiving streams at a value of equal to or less than 1.0. In order to use the Provision C.3.g.iii HM Standard – Direct Simulation of Erosion Potential, for their HM Projects, the CCCWP Permittees shall distinguish the range of situations present within their jurisdictions and incorporate an associated range of sizing factors for HM controls (described below in Provision C.3.g.vi.(2)) to address that range of situations, sufficient to demonstrate that appropriately-sized HM controls in those respective situations would achieve the HM Standard. The CCCWP Permittees shall submit a Technical Report describing and justifying these criteria, subject to the Executive Officer’s approval.
iv. Types of HM Controls
Projects shall meet the HM Standard using any of the following HM controls or a combination thereof:
(1) Onsite HM controls are flow duration control structures, LID features and facilities, and hydrologic source controls that collectively result in the HM Standard being met at the point(s) where stormwater runoff discharges from the project site. (2) Regional HM controls are flow duration control structures that collect stormwater runoff discharge from multiple projects (each of which shall incorporate hydrologic source control measures as well) and are designed such that the HM Standard is met for all the projects at the point where the regional HM control discharges.
(3) In-stream measures shall be an option only where the stream, which receives runoff from the project, is already impacted by erosive flows and shows evidence of excessive sediment, erosion, deposition, or is a hardened channel.In-stream measures involve modifying the receiving stream channel slope and geometry so that the stream can convey the new flow regime without increasing the potential for erosion and aggradation. In-stream measures are intended to improve long-term channel stability and prevent erosion by reducing the erosive forces imposed on the channel boundary.In-stream measures, or a combination of in-stream and onsite controls, shall be designed to achieve the HM Standard from the point where the project(s) discharge(s) to the stream to the mouth of the stream or to achieve an equivalent degree of flow control mitigation (based on amount of impervious surface mitigated) as part of an in-stream project located in the same watershed. Designing in-stream controls requires a hydrologic and geomorphic evaluation (including a longitudinal profile) of the stream system downstream and upstream of the project. As with all in-stream activities, other regulatory permits must be obtained by the project proponent.32 v. Implementation Level
(1) For Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and Solano Permittees, HM Projects shall meet the HM Standard in Provision C.3.g.ii immediately. (2) For CCCWP Permittees, HM Projects receiving final planning entitlements prior to Executive Officer approval of CCCWP’s submittal pursuant to Provisions C.3.g.iii and C.3.g.vi.(2) shall use the methods and criteria specified in CCCWP’s Stormwater C.3 Guidebook, 7th Edition (2017), or most current version. Subsequent to Executive Officer approval of CCCWP’s submittal pursuant to Provisions C.3.g.iii and C.3.g.vi.(2), HM Projects shall use the methods and criteria specified (and/or acknowledged and approved) in the Executive Officer’s approval or conditional approval of that submittal; CCCWP Permittees may alternatively implement the HM Standard in Provision C.3.g.ii. vi. Reporting
(1) New HM Applicability Maps or equivalent information prepared pursuant to Provision C.3.g.i, for those Permittees who do not have an approved Map, shall be submitted, acceptable to the Executive Officer, not later than with the 2023 Annual Report. (2) With the 2023 Annual Report, the CCCWP Permittees shall submit a Technical Report subject to the Executive Officer’s approval, consisting of a HM Management Plan describing how the CCCW Permittees will implement the HM Standard specified in Provision C.3.g.iii. The Technical Report shall include:

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(a) A complete suite of sizing factors – for each type of HM control that may be used in the County – that is protective of all likely site and watershed characteristics, for sites with soils in Hydrologic Soil Groups (HSG) A, B, C, and D, with equations for adjustments to the sizing factors based on geographic differences (including, but not limited to, annual rainfall intensity and frequency, land use, and other hydrologic characteristics), based on the methods and criteria in the CCCWP Hydromodification Technical Report (September 29, 2017), and pursuant to the recommendations provided in the Water Board’s Response to CCCWP’s Hydromodification Management Memo of November 4, 2020 (March 19, 2021). The complete suite of sizing factors shall ensure each type of HM control achieves the Provision C.3.g.iii HM Standard. For the complete suite of sizing factors, the base case sizing factor for HM controls at sites with HSG D soils shall be 6.5 percent.33 (b) The Technical Report may optionally identify geographic areas or criteria for site-by-site determination, where the use of the prescribed methods, criteria, and suite of sizing factors may result in HM Projects failing to comply with the Provision C.3.g.iii HM Standard. For those areas, the Technical Report shall propose additional onsite mitigation measures, which when implemented in addition to the complete suite of sizing factors specified in Provision C.3.g.vi.(2)(a), ensure that HM controls achieve the Provision C.3.g.iii HM Standard. The additional onsite mitigation measures include, but are not limited to: site grading to produce self-retaining areas, specific guidance on augmentation of HM control design (e.g., increasing the size of the storage layer), and increases to the HM control sizing factors. The additional mitigation measures shall not include: reliance on land development restrictions, or on open space preservation, or on the presence of existing or future HM and LID controls located elsewhere within the catchment. The Technical Report may additionally propose alternative or supplemental methods of compliance with the Provision C.3.g.iii HM Standard, including any combination of: undersized onsite HM controls, additional new HM controls located offsite within the same catchment as the receiving stream, and in- stream controls (e.g., as described in SCVURPPP’s 2005 Hydromodification Management Plan Final Report), which when implemented together achieve the Provision C.3.g.iii HM Standard.(3) Reporting of HM projects shall be as described in Provision C.3.b. (4) Permittees allowing the use of BAHM shall report collectively, with each Annual Report, a listing, summary, and date of modifications made to the BAHM, including the technical rationale. This shall be prepared at the countywide program level and submitted on behalf of participating Permittees. (5) In addition, for each HM Project approved during the reporting period, Permittees shall collect and make available the following information.

Information shall be reported electronically, and, where appropriate, in tabular form. -  Device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, such as detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention basin, or in-stream control(s);
-  Method used by the project proponent to design and size the device or method used to meet the HM Standard; - Site plans identifying impervious areas, surface flow directions for the entire site, and location(s) of HM measures; - For projects using standard sizing charts, a summary of sizing calculations used; - For projects using the BAHM, a listing of model inputs; and - For projects using custom modeling, a summary of the modeling calculations with a corresponding graph showing curve matching (existing, post- project, and post-project-with HM controls curves).

C.3.h.   Operation and Maintenance of Stormwater Treatment Systems C i.  Task Description – Each Permittee shall implement an Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Verification Program. ii.  Implementation Level – At a minimum, the O&M Verification Program shall include the following elements:
(1) Conditions of approval or other legally enforceable agreements or mechanisms for all Regulated Projects that, at a minimum, require at least one of the following from all project proponents and their successors in control of the Project or successors in fee title:
(a) The project proponent’s signed statement accepting responsibility for the O&M of the installed pervious pavement system(s) (if any), onsite, joint, and/or offsite stormwater treatment system(s), and HM control(s) (if any) until such responsibility is legally transferred to another entity; C
vi.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(b) Written conditions in the sales or lease agreements or deed for the project that requires the buyer or lessee to assume responsibility for the O&M of the pervious pavement system(s) (if any), onsite, joint, and/or offsite installed stormwater treatment system(s), and HM control(s) (if any) until such responsibility is legally transferred to another entity; (c) Written text in project deeds, or conditions, covenants and restrictions (CCRs) for multi-unit residential projects that require the homeowners association or, if there is no association, each individual owner to assume responsibility for the O&M of the installed pervious pavement system(s) (if any), onsite, joint, and/or offsite stormwater treatment system(s), and HM control(s) (if any) until such responsibility is legally transferred to another entity; or   (d) Any other legally enforceable agreement or mechanism, such as recordation in the property deed, that assigns the O&M responsibility for the installed pervious pavement system(s) (if any), onsite, joint, and/or offsite treatment system(s) and HM control(s) (if any) to the project owner(s) or the Permittee.(2) Coordination with the appropriate mosquito and vector control agency with jurisdiction to establish a protocol for notification of installed stormwater treatment systems and HM controls.
(3) Conditions of approval or other legally enforceable agreements or mechanisms for all Regulated Projects that require the granting of site access to all representatives of the Permittee, local mosquito and vector control agency staff, and Water Board staff, for the sole purpose of performing O&M inspections of the installed pervious pavement system(s) (if any), stormwater treatment system(s) and HM control(s) (if any).

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(4) A database or equivalent tabular format of the following:
(a) All pervious pavement system(s) that total 3000 square feet or more installed at Regulated Projects, offsite, or at a Regional Project. The total square footage should not include pervious pavement systems installed as private-use patios for single family homes, townhomes, or condominiums. (b) All stormwater treatment systems installed onsite at Regulated Projects, offsite, or at a joint or Regional Project. all HM controls installed onsite at Regulated Projects, offsite, or at a joint or Regional Project. (c) All HM controls installed onsite at Regulated Projects, offsite, or at a joint or Regional Project. (5) The database or equivalent tabular format required in Provision C.3.h.ii.(4) shall include the following information for each Regulated Project, offsite project, and Regional Project , and shall be made available to Water Board staff upon request:
(a) Name and address of the project;
(b) Names of the owner(s) and responsible operator(s) of the installed pervious pavement system(s) (if any), stormwater treatment system(s), and/or HM control(s);
(c) Specific description of the location (or a map showing the location) of the installed pervious pavement system(s) (if any), stormwater treatment system(s), and HM control(s) (if any);
(d) Date(s) that the pervious pavement system(s) (if any), stormwater treatment system(s), and HM controls (if any) was/were installed; (e) Description of the type and size of the pervious pavement systems (if any), stormwater treatment system(s), and HM control(s) (if any) installed; (f) Detailed information on O&M inspections. For each inspection, include the following:
(i) Date of inspection.
(ii)  Type of inspection (e.g., installation, annual, followup, spot). (iii) Type(s) of pervious pavement systems inspected (e.g., pervious concrete, pervious asphalt, pervious pavers). (iv) Type(s) of stormwater treatment systems inspected (e.g., swale, bioretention unit, tree well) and an indication of whether the treatment system is an onsite, joint, or offsite system.
(v) Type of HM controls inspected.
(vi) Inspection findings or results (e.g., proper installation, proper operation and maintenance, system not operating properly because of plugging, bypass of stormwater because of improper installation or maintenance, maintenance required immediately). (vii) Enforcement action(s) taken, if any (e.g., verbal warning, notice of violation, compliance schedule, administrative citation, administrative order). (6) A prioritized O&M Inspection Plan for inspecting all pervious pavement systems that total 3,000 square feet or more (excluding private-use patios for single family homes, townhomes, or condominiums), stormwater treatment systems and HM controls installed at Regulated Projects, offsite locations, and/or at joint or Regional Projects. For residential subdivisions with pervious pavement systems that include individual driveways, inspection of a representative number of driveways is sufficient. At a minimum, the O&M Inspection Plan must specify the following for each fiscal year:
(a) Inspection by the Permittee of all newly installed pervious pavement systems that total 3,000 square feet or more (excluding private-use patios for single family homes, townhomes, or condominiums), stormwater treatment systems, and HM controls (at Regulated Projects, offsite locations, and/or at joint or Regional Projects) at the completion of installation to ensure approved plans have been followed. For residential subdivisions with pervious pavement systems that include individual driveways, inspection of a representative number of driveways is sufficient; (b) Inspection by the Permittee of an average of 20 percent, but no less than 15 percent, of the total number (at the end of the preceding fiscal year) of Regulated Projects, offsite projects, or Regional Projects. Each inspection shall include inspection of all pervious pavement systems that total 3,000 square feet or more (excluding private-use patios for single family homes, townhomes, or condominiums), stormwater treatment systems, and HM controls installed at the Regulated Project, offsite project, or Regional Project. For residential subdivisions with pervious pavement systems that include individual driveways, inspection of a representative number of driveways is sufficient; (c) Inspection by the Permittee of all Regulated Projects, offsite projects, or Regional Projects at least once every five years.  Each inspection shall include inspection of all pervious pavement systems that total 3,000 square feet or more (excluding private-use patios for single family homes, townhomes, or condominiums), stormwater treatment systems, and HM controls installed at the Regulated Project, offsite project, or Regional Project.

For residential subdivisions with pervious pavement systems that include individual driveways, inspection of a representative number of driveways is sufficient; and
(d) For vault-based stormwater treatment systems, Permittees may  accept 3rd party inspection reports in lieu of conducting Permittee operation and maintenance inspections only if the 3rd party inspections are conducted at least annually. Information from each 3rd party inspection shall be included in the database or tabular format required in Provision C.3.h.ii.(5) and each inspection shall be clearly identified as a 3rd party inspection. Each 3rd party inspection report must clearly document the following:
(i)  Name of 3rd party inspection company.
(ii) Date of inspection.

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency

(iii) Condition of the treatment unit(s) at the time of inspection. (iv) Description of maintenance activities performed during the inspection. (v) Date- and time-stamped photographs of the inside of the vault unit(s) before and after maintenance activities. (7) An Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) for all operation and maintenance inspections that serves as a reference document for inspection staff so that consistent enforcement actions can be taken to bring development projects into compliance. At a minimum, the ERP must contain the following:
(a) Enforcement Procedures – A description of the Permittee’s  procedures from the discovery of problems through the confirmation of implementation of corrective actions. This shall include guidance for recognizing common problems with the different types of pervious pavement systems, stormwater treatment systems, and/or HM controls, remedies for the problems, and appropriate enforcement actions, follow-up inspections, and appropriate time periods for implementation of corrective actions, and the roles and responsibilities of staff responsible for implementing the ERP. (b) Enforcement Tools and Field Scenarios – A discussion of the various, escalating enforcement tools appropriate for different field scenarios of problems identified with the pervious pavement systems, stormwater treatment systems, and/or HM controls as well as for different types of inadequate response to enforcement actions taken.
(c) Timely Correction of Identified Problems – A description of the Permittee’s procedures for assigning due dates for corrective actions. Permittees shall require timely correction of all identified problems with the pervious pavement systems, stormwater treatment systems,  and/or HM controls.

Corrective actions shall be implemented no longer than 30 days after a problem is identified by an inspector. Corrective actions can be temporary, in which case more time may be allowed for permanent corrective actions. If more than 30 days are required for compliance, a rationale shall be recorded in the electronic database or equivalent tabular system. iii.  Due Date for Implementation:  Immediate
iv. Maintenance Approvals: The Permittees shall ensure that all pervious pavement systems that total 3,000 square feet or more (excluding private-use patios for single family homes, townhomes, or condominiums), stormwater treatment systems, and HM controls installed onsite, offsite, or at a joint or Regional Project by development proponents are properly operated and maintained for the life of the projects. In cases where the responsible party for a pervious pavement system, stormwater treatment system, or HM control has worked diligently and in good faith with the appropriate State and federal agencies to obtain approvals necessary to complete maintenance activities, but these approvals are not granted, the Permittees shall be deemed to be in compliance with Provision C.3.h. Permittees shall ensure that constructed wetlands installed by Regulated Projects and used for urban runoff treatment shall abide by the Water Board’s Resolution No. 94-102: Policy on the Use of Constructed Wetlands for Urban Runoff Pollution Control and the operation and maintenance requirements contained therein.v. Reporting (1) The database or equivalent tabular format required in Provisions C.3.b.ii.(4) and (5) shall be maintained by the Permittees. Upon request from the Executive Officer, information from this database or equivalent tabular format shall be submitted to Water Board staff for review. The requested information may include specific details on each inspection conducted within particular timeframes, such as several fiscal years. (2) On an annual basis, before the wet season, provide a list of newly installed (installed within the reporting period) stormwater treatment systems and HM controls to the local mosquito and vector control agency and the Water Board. This list shall include the facility locations and a description of the stormwater treatment measures and HM controls installed. (3) Each Permittee shall report the following information in the Annual Report each year:
(a) Total number of Regulated Projects in the Permittee’s database or tabular format as of the end of the reporting period (fiscal year). (b) Total number of Regulated Projects, offsite projects, and Regional Projects inspected during the reporting period (fiscal year). (c) Percentage of the total number of Regulated Projects that were inspected during the reporting period (fiscal year). (d) A discussion of the inspection findings for the year and any common problems encountered with various types of pervious pavement systems, treatment systems and/or HM controls. This discussion should include a general comparison to the inspection findings from the previous year. (e) A discussion of the effectiveness of the Permittee’s O&M Program and any proposed changes to improve the O&M Program (e.g., changes in prioritization plan or frequency of O&M inspections, other changes to improve effectiveness of program).

C.3.i.  Required Site Design Measures for Small Development and Redevelopment Projects and Smaller Detached Single-Family Home Projects C i.  Task Description – The Permittees shall require all development and redevelopment projects, which create and/or replace ≥ 2,500 ft2 to < 5,000 ft2 of impervious surface, and detached single-family home projects,27 which create and/or replace ≥ 2,500 ft2 to < 10,000 ft2 of impervious surface, to install one or more of the following site design measures:
-  Direct roof runoff into cisterns or rain barrels for reuse. -  Direct roof runoff onto vegetated areas.
-   Direct runoff from sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios onto vegetated areas. -  Direct runoff from driveways and/or uncovered parking lots onto vegetated areas.

C
ii.

SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION MUNICIPAL STORMWATER NPDES PERMIT - MRP 3.0 R2-2022-0018                                                            ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF VALLEJO AND VALLEJO SANITATION AND FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES LEGEND:  C = CITY          D = DISTRICT                        B = BOTH CITY & DISTRICT Responsible Section Agency