Agenda packet — West Sacramento City Council, August 5, 2026 (part 3 of 5)

1.0 INTRODUCTION
The California Legislature passed five bills in 2007 to better align flood risk reduction investments, land-use decisions, and statewide flood planning objectives. One of these bills, Senate Bill (SB) 5, requires cities and counties within the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys to make findings related to an urban level of flood protection before approving certain land-use decisions. An “urban level of flood protection” is defined as 200-year level of flood protection, that is, the level of protection necessary to withstand flooding that has a 1-in-200 chance of occurring in any given year using criteria developed by the California Department of Water Resources (DWR). Examples of the land-use decisions affected by these requirements include the continued ability to approve discretionary permits, entitlements, and tentative maps.

State law mandates that cities and counties within the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys, with populations over 10,000, or projected to reach this threshold by 2025, must make a finding regarding urban level of flood protection by July 1, 2016. One permissible finding is of “adequate progress,” indicating that the local flood management agency has made adequate progress towards construction of a flood protection system that meets or exceeds urban level of flood protection standards. For areas protected by State Plan of Flood Control (SPFC) levees, the urban level of flood protection must be achieved by 2025. SB 901 (2022) extended the deadline for West Sacramento to 2030, and SB 586 (2023) extended it again to 2040. Accordingly, 2040 is the operative deadline for this annual progress report, with a new 2026 Finding of Adequate Progress prepared separately.

The City of West Sacramento (City) is within the floodplain of the Sacramento River and almost entirely surrounded by floodways and levees [Figure 1]. During large flood events, the City can become an urban island that depends on the successful performance of nearly 50 miles of levees to protect against the inflow of flood waters. However, portions of this levee system does not meet current design standards and needs repairs to provide the required urban level of flood protection.

The West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) is advancing a comprehensive program of activities referred to as the West Sacramento Levee Improvement Program (WSLIP) to reduce flood risk to the City. This program includes: (1) partnering with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB) to implement the West Sacramento Project as authorized by Congress in the 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act; (2) partnering with DWR in the planning, design, and construction of improvements along several high risk reaches of levee protecting the City; and (3) community outreach regarding the existing flood risk and improved emergency response planning. The primary goal of WSAFCA is to achieve at least a 200-year level of flood protection for the City as quickly as possible, which is currently driven by the federally authorized flood risk management project.

Since 2006, WSAFCA, the State and the USACE have invested approximately $382.2 million toward the planning, design, land acquisition, and construction toward completion of the 200-year Project through 2025. WSAFCA executed a federal Design Funding agreement with the CVFPB and the USACE in April 2019, followed by a Project Partnership Agreement in September 2022. Construction of the Yolo Bypass East Levee improvements were completed in 2025. The USACE is actively designing Sacramento River North Levee improvements, with the next phase of construction scheduled to begin in 2029.

This report describes the progress the City has made to achieve an urban level of flood protection since 2006. This report is not intended to substitute for the independent judgment of the City in adopting findings.
267

Page 2 of 16 ends

2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
This report is intended to address California Government Code 65007(a)(5), which requires an annual report to the CVFPB describing progress toward achieving an urban level of flood protection for the flood protection system. The City adopted an initial finding of adequate progress through approval of Resolution 16-45 by the City Council on June 1, 2016, for the Levee Protected Area (Figure 2). The first Adequate Progress Annual Report and the substantial evidence necessary to support a finding of adequate progress toward achieving an urban level of flood protection was posted to the City website in June 2016 and provided to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board. The initial finding of adequate progress expired in 2025; the City intends to make a new Finding of Adequate Progress in 2026 based on the implementation status of the federally authorized West Sacramento Project and the current legislative requirement to achieve a minimum 200-yr level of protection by 2040.

3.0 URBAN LEVEL OF FLOOD PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS

3.1. Urban Level of Flood Protection Overview
In 2007, the California Legislature passed, and the Governor signed five interrelated bills to strengthen the alignment between flood risk reduction investments, land-use decisions, and statewide flood planning objectives. These bills, effective January 1, 2008, collectively added or amended sections in the California Government Code, Health and Safety Code, Public Resources Code, and Water Code.

Specifically, SB 5 (2007), as amended by SB 1278 (2012), Assembly Bill (AB) 1259 (2013), and as amended by SB 901 (2022), requires cities and counties within the Sacramento and San Joaquin valleys to make findings related to an urban level of flood protection before approving certain land-use decisions.

California Government Code Section 65007(n) states:
“Urban level of flood protection” means the level of protection that is necessary to withstand flooding that has a 1-in-200 chance of occurring in any given year using criteria consistent with, or developed by, the Department of Water Resources. “Urban level of flood protection” shall not mean shallow flooding or flooding from local drainage that meets the criteria of the national Federal Emergency Management Agency standard of flood protection.

Based on this definition of an urban level of protection, SB 5 requires local land-use agencies to make one of the following findings prior to approving certain land-use decisions (GC §65865.5, §65962, and §66474.5):
• The existing flood management facilities protect the property to the urban level of flood protection in urban areas.
• The city or county has imposed conditions that will protect the property to the urban level of flood protection in urban areas.
• The local flood management agency has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system which will result in providing an urban level of flood protection to property located within a flood hazard zone. For an urban area, the urban level of flood protection shall be achieved by 2025, as amended by SB 901, “This bill would require the City of West Sacramento, as defined, to achieve the urban level of flood protection by 2030.” • The property in an undetermined risk area has met the urban level of flood protection based on substantial evidence in the record.
268

Page 3 of 16 ends

The land-use decisions affected by these requirements include all of the following:
• Entering into a development agreement for any property that is located within a flood hazard zone (GC §65865.5);
• Approving a discretionary permit or other discretionary entitlement, or a ministerial permit that would result in the construction of a new residence, for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone (GC §65962); or,
• Approving a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, for any subdivision that is located within a flood hazard zone (GC §66474.5).

SB 5 also required DWR to develop criteria that cities and counties could use to make findings related to an urban level of flood protection. DWR met this requirement through the development of two guidance documents. First, DWR developed the Urban Level of Flood Protection Criteria (2013) to establish the procedural criteria associated with making a finding consistent with the legislative requirements. Second, DWR incorporated by reference the Urban Levee Design Criteria (2012) in the Urban Level of Flood Protection Criteria to provide additional engineering guidance to civil engineers in situations where levees and floodwalls are used to provide an urban level of flood protection.

3.2. Deadline for Findings
SB 5 required that cities and counties amend their general plans within 24 months of adoption of the 2012 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (CVFPP). It also required that zoning ordinances be amended within 12 months after completion of the general plan amendments. The Urban Level of Flood Protection requirements apply once the general plan and zoning ordinance amendments become effective, but no later than 36 months after adoption of the CVFPP.

SB 1278 (2012) extended the deadline for amending general plans by twelve months. As a result, cities and counties needed to amend their general plans within 36 months of adoption of the CVFPP – July 1, 2015. The City amended its General Plan consistent with the requirements of SB 5 through adoption of Resolution 15-43 on June 17, 2015. SB 1278 (2012) did not change the zoning ordinance timeline; therefore, zoning ordinances must be updated, and a finding related to the Urban Level of Flood Protection is required, no later than 48 months after adoption of the CVFPP – July 1, 2016.

SB 5 and DWR’s 2013 Urban Level of Flood Protection Criteria require that the urban level of flood protection be achieved by 2025 for areas protected by levees within the SPFC. SB 586 (2023) most recently extended the deadline for the City of West Sacramento to 2040. Therefore, a new 2026 Finding of Adequate Progress will be prepared by the City, which documents the progress made on the federally authorized West Sacramento Project towards achieving an urban level of flood risk.

3.3. Effective Period for a Finding of Adequate Progress In many cases, a finding adopted by a local agency can be used for subsequent land-use approvals within the covered area of the incorporated city. Setting an effective period for the finding is necessary because it is unreasonable to assume that conditions, information, and assumptions used as a basis for a finding will remain constant in perpetuity. In the specific case of an adequate progress finding, the initial finding can last no longer than 10 years; and it can only be used beyond 2025 if the covered area is not protected by SPFC levees. This has been amended in SB 901, which would instead require the City of West Sacramento to achieve the urban level of protection by 2030 and further extended by SB 586 to 2040. The City therefore will prepare a new 2026 Finding of Adequate Progress. 269

Page 4 of 16 ends

The Urban Level of Flood Protection Criteria document encourages local agencies to formally review the initial finding (1) when significant physical changes are experienced in the covered area, and, (2) as part of recurring review process conducted by USACE through the Periodic Inspection Program.

3.4. Adequate Progress Annual Report
California Government Code Section 65007(a)(5) requires the “local flood management agency shall annually report to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board on the efforts in working toward completion of the flood protection system.” As a result, WSAFCA will prepare annual progress reports related to the finding of adequate progress. Given that the Annual Adequate Progress Report (AAPR) relies heavily on demonstrating that planned funding has been secured and expended, these reports will be submitted annually to summarize progress for the previous fiscal year.

4.0 ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF ADEQUATE PROGRESS FINDING

4.1. Project Scope, Schedule, and Cost
The scope to achieve a minimum 200-year level of protection for the City is referred to as the 200-year Project. This project includes structural improvements associated with the Early Implementation Projects (EIPs) advanced by WSAFCA and DWR and Implementation of the federally authorized project by USACE.

WSAFCA developed an Adequate Progress Financial Plan (Financial Plan) that includes an implementation schedule and assumptions for the timing and amount of federal, State, and local funding appropriations required to complete the WSLIP structural improvements by 2040. The Financial Plan will be revised in 2026 to support the City’s new finding. Construction of the EIP phase levee improvements of the WSLIP was substantially completed in 2020. The federally-led West Sacramento Project was initiated in 2019 and completion is planned for 2038.

The total cost estimate to complete the federal project in the 2023 APR was $1,244 million. The current cost estimate to complete the federal project is $2.1B based on the USACE June 2025 updated total project cost estimate (Table 1, Column D Total).

The State and WSAFCA completed $36.9 million (Table 1, Column A Total) in levee improvements on the Sacramento Bypass (CHP Academy Project), the Sacramento River West North Levee (The Rivers Project), and the I Street Bridge Project. The cost estimate to complete the Sacramento River West South Levee (Southport Project) is estimated at $188.3 million (Table 1, Column B Total).

The USACE June 2025 total project cost estimate was used to populate Table 1, Column C excluding the estimated cost to complete the Sac River West South Levee under the Southport project. The estimated remaining cost to complete the federally-led portion of the project is $1,875 million (Table 1, Column C Total).

In summary, the total 200-year program cost is estimated at $2,100 million as of June 2025 (Table 1, Column D Total). The total cost estimate for work authorized as part of the West Sacramento federal project is $2,052 million (Table 1, Column E Total).
270

Page 5 of 16 ends

Table 1: WSLIP Cost Estimate for State-Local Led Projects and the Federal Led Project.

Notes
[A] State and Local-led Project costs based on actual costs to complete the Rivers & I Steet Projects (Sacramento River West North) and CHP Academy (Sacramento Bypass) project. These project features were completed under section 408 and are not creditable against the federal project. [B] State and Local-led Project costs based on actual costs to complete the Southport project (Sacramento River West South Levee). Estimated $116.6 million in NFS Section 221 credit to be approved by the USACE and estimated $52.9 million in LERRDs will be credited toward the project. [C] The Federal Led Project cost estimate based on USACE Total Project Cost estimate prepared in June 2025 and excludes State-Local work advanced under UFRR/EIP. [D] The 200-year Project cost estimate is based on actual costs to complete all State and Local-led Project and an estimate of the federally authorized project. [E] The federally authorized project cost estimate is based on creditable State and Local-led work and an estimate of the remaining federal led project cost.

Levee Reach
State-Local Work
Excluded Fed. Auth.
[A]
State-Local Work
Included Fed. Auth.
[B]
WSAFCA Est. Federal
Led
Project
[C]
WSAFCA
WSLIP 200-year
Estimate
[D = A + B + C]
WSAFCA
Total Project
Cost Estimate
[E = B + C]
North Basin
Sac River West North Levee-Rivers $22,052,000 $514,782,000 $536,834,000 $514,782,000 Sac River West North Levee-I Street $3,134,000 $3,134,000 $0 Training Berm $25,720,000 $25,720,000 $25,720,000
Sacramento Bypass-CHP Academy $11,734,000 $11,734,000 $0 Yolo Bypass $28,777,000 $28,777,000 $28,777,000
Port North Levee $25,324,000 $25,324,000 $25,324,000
Closure Structure $0
Stone Lock Structure $174,846,000 $174,846,000 $174,846,000 Sub-Total North Basin $36,920,000 $0 $769,449,000 $806,369,000 $769,449,000 South Basin
Sac River West South Levee $188,320,000 $188,320,000 $177,219,000 Deep Water Ship Channel West $779,232,000 $779,232,000 $779,232,000 Deep Water Ship Channel East $242,312,000 $242,312,000 $242,312,000 Port South Levee $17,503,000 $17,503,000 $17,503,000
South Cross Levee $66,762,000 $66,762,000 $66,762,000
Sub-Total South Basin $0 $188,320,000 $1,105,809,000 $1,294,129,000 $1,283,028,000 Total $36,920,000 $188,320,000 $1,875,258,000 $2,100,498,000 $2,052,477,000 Levee Reach
Federal Share of Project $1,334,110,050 $1,334,110,050
State Share of Project [1] $543,486,365 $502,856,865
Local Share of Project [2] $222,901,585 $215,510,085
Total $2,100,498,000 $2,052,477,000
271

Page 6 of 16 ends

4.2. Funding Scenarios for the Federal West Sacramento Project The current focus of the West Sacramento Project is to advance design and construction along remaining project reaches. This will more accurately identify the geographic extent of flood risk reduction improvements in the authorized project and better define the cost to construct improvements and secure necessary Lands, Easements, Rights-of-Way, Relocations, and Disposal sites (LERRDs).

4.3. Revenue and Expenditures
From 2007 through June 2025, WSAFCA, in partnership with the State of California and the USACE, have expended approximately $387.4 million toward completion of the 200-year Project, as shown in Cumulative Program Expenditures in Table 2. These expenses supported the planning, design, land acquisition, and construction of levee improvements to reduce flood risk to the City. This includes the completion of the flood risk reduction improvements for I Street Bridge, the Rivers, CHP Academy, the Southport EIPs, along with design and construction of the Yolo Bypass Levee and design of the Sacramento River North Levee. Funding for the completed improvements was provided by three main sources: the federal government, the State of California, and locally matched funds provided by WSAFCA. Federal appropriations are assumed as spent revenue in the fiscal years they are programmed to the West Sacramento project.

The planned expenditures for federal, State, and local funding for the West Sacramento Federal Project, reported annually, can be found in the Adequate Progress Reports for 2016-17, 2017- 18, 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, and 2023-24. Please refer to these reports for more details on prior reported data. The current planned expenditures for the federal, State, and local funding, are shown in Table 2.
272

Page 7 of 16 ends

Table 2: WSLIP 200-year Expenditure and Revised Projections (ULOP Adequate Progress Report, January 2026).

Notes:
[1] Includes costs of construction for the CHP Academy, the Rivers, and I Street Bridge projects that are not part of the federally authorized USACE project.

Summary of federal, State and Local Expenditures 2006-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 2037-38 Totals Federal Share $97,652,000 $52,758,297 $0 $0 $0 $111,800,000 $221,400,000 $24,800,000 $18,900,000 $0 $784,400,000 $22,399,753 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,334,110,050 State Share [1] $161,643,817 $12,963,480 $2,964,364 $6,145,249 $6,145,249 $30,434,444 $60,270,000 $6,751,111 $5,145,000 $6,145,249 $213,531,111 $6,097,711 $6,145,249 $6,145,249 $6,145,249 $6,813,831 $543,486,365 Local Share [1] $53,881,272 $4,307,490 $1,270,442 $3,580,048 $3,580,048 $13,043,333 $25,830,000 $2,893,333 $2,205,000 $3,580,048 $91,513,333 $2,613,305 $3,580,048 $3,580,048 $3,580,048 $3,863,786 $222,901,585 Subtotal Capital federal, State and Local Expenditures $313,177,089 $70,029,267 $4,234,805 $9,725,298 $9,725,298 $155,277,778 $307,500,000 $34,444,444 $26,250,000 $9,725,298 $1,089,444,444 $31,110,768 $9,725,298 $9,725,298 $9,725,298 $10,677,617 $2,100,498,000 Cumulative Expenditures $313,177,089 $383,206,356 $387,441,161 $397,166,459 $406,891,757 $562,169,535 $869,669,535 $904,113,979 $930,363,979 $940,089,277 $2,029,533,721 $2,060,644,489 $2,070,369,787 $2,080,095,085 $2,089,820,383 $2,100,498,000 273

Page 8 of 16 ends

4.4. History of Appropriations
Table 3 shows the contributions from local, State, and federal sources toward the WSLIP through June 2025. Local property assessments supported the issuance of bonds in 2008, 2011, 2015, and 2020, totaling $41.2 million. In addition to bond proceeds, WSAFCA secured $10 million from the City in Measure V sales tax revenue and $8.3 million in In-Lieu Fee, interest, and other miscellaneous reimbursements. The State of California has provided approximately $177.6 million in funding, while the USACE has appropriated $150.4 million.

WSAFCA has secured approximately 102% of the appropriations for planned expenditures through June 2025. The USACE, State, and WSAFCA have respectively appropriated approximately 97%, 102%, and 102% of the funding needed to cover planned expenditures through June 2025, as compared to the 2023 AAPR.

Table 3: Status of Appropriations (in millions of dollars) through June 2025.

Notes:
[1] Planned expenses are the cumulative expenses through Fiscal Year 2023-24 reported in the July 2024 Annual Adequate Progress Report.

4.5. Actual vs. Planned Expenditures
Table 4 shows the percent of actual versus planned expenditures for the USACE/State/WSAFCA cumulative from 2006 through June 2024 as compared to the cumulative 2023 AAPR.

Table 4: Percent of actual versus planned expenditures for Fiscal Year 2023-24 in 2023 AAPR.

Notes:
[*] Percentages calculated from values in Table 4 (2023 AAPR) for planned expenditures and Table 4 (2024- 2025 AAPR) for actual expenditures.

Total Planned % Appropriated
Summary of federal, State and Local Funding Appropriations Expenses [1] vs. Planned Exp.

A B C = B/A
Federal Government (USACE) $150.4 $154.4 97%
State of California (State) $177.6 $174.4 102%
WSAFCA/City of West Sacramento $59.5 $58.1 102%
Totals $387.4 $386.9 100%
Summary of federal, State and Local Funding
Actual
A
Planned
B
Cumulative 2006-24
C = A/B
Federal Share $150,410,297 $154,410,000 97%
State Share $174,607,296 $174,405,579 100%
Local Share $58,188,763 $58,102,312 100%
Subtotal Capital federal, State and Local Funding $383,206,356 $386,917,891 99% 274

Page 9 of 16 ends

4.6. Advancement of Critical Features
The following critical features have been advanced by WSAFCA in partnership with DWR, the CVFPB and USACE.

1. Early Implementation Projects – WSAFCA, in a close technical and financial partnership with DWR, has engaged in levee improvements at four project sites including: (a) I-Street Bridge – construction completed in 2008; (b) CHP Academy – construction completed in 2012; (c) The Rivers – construction completed in 2012; and (4) Southport – construction completed in 2019 [Figure 3].

2. Sacramento River Bank Protection Project (RM 57.2 Setback Levee) – USACE, through the Sacramento River Bank Protection Project, setback approximately 2,000 feet of levee in lieu of placing rock protection on the existing riverbank. The project was completed in 2015 [Figure 3].

3. West Sacramento Project Repairs – USACE, under the West Sacramento Project authority, repaired two locations along the Yolo Bypass Levee. These projects were completed in 2009 and 2012 [Figure 3].

4. West Sacramento General Reevaluation Report (GRR) – USACE, in partnership with WSAFCA and the CVFPB, conducted a general reevaluation of the City of West Sacramento levee system and determined a Federal interest in approximately $1.2 billion in flood risk reduction measures. WSAFCA executed a Section 221 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the USACE on July 23, 2014, allowing WSAFCA to credit most of the expenditures on the Southport Project against future implementation of the GRR. The Chief of Engineer’s Report was signed on April 26, 2016.

5. West Sacramento Project – Congress authorized the West Sacramento Project in the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act in December 2016. WSAFCA executed a federal Design Funding agreement with the CVFPB and USACE on April 5, 2019, and a federal Project Partnership Agreement was executed on September 7, 2022. The features of the federal project are shown in Figure 4.

6. South Cross Levee – USACE conditionally approved a request by WSAFCA to include this non-SPFC facility in the PL 84-99 Rehabilitation Program as a non-Federal Flood Work.

Approval creates opportunity for federal emergency response and rehabilitation assistance.

Conditional approval was received in April 2016 [Figure 3].

7. Hydraulic Separation of West Sacramento Levee System – USACE approved a request to redefine the West Sacramento - Sac Yolo South Levee System by dividing it at the South Cross Levee based on an analysis of hydraulic separation commissioned by WSAFCA.

Approval removes several miles of levee along the Sacramento River south of the city limit from the West Sacramento levee system. It also means that future federal eligibility determinations (levee inspections) will be based solely on levees protecting the City and not the expansive rural levee system to the south. Approval was received in April 2016.

8. West Sacramento Systemwide Improvement Framework – WSAFCA submitted a Letter of Intent (LOI) to prepare a Systemwide Improvement Framework (SWIF) to the USACE that was approved on April 18, 2018. The levee system protecting the City is now eligible for Public Law (PL) 84-99 federal rehabilitation assistance for a period of two years from the date of the original LOI approval. The SWIF for the West Sacramento Levee System was approved by USACE in September 2025.
275

Page 10 of 16 ends

9. Yolo Bypass Construction – Construction of the Yolo Bypass East Levee North and emergency repairs to the Yolo Bypass East Levee South sections were completed by USACE in 2025 [Figure 4].

10. Sacramento River North Levee and Stone Lock Structure: WSAFCA, DWR, and the USACE are currently advancing key design efforts that will help expedite design and construction of the Federal Project for these reaches [Figure 4].

11. Southport Restoration Project – WSAFCA completed design and construction of approximately 120 acres of mixed floodplain and riparian habitat that will serve as advanced mitigation for some of the impacts from implementation of the balance of the federal project.

4.7. Delays
The federal West Sacramento Project is currently planned for completion by 2038, ahead of the 2040 deadline for the City to complete the State mandated urban level of flood protection.

WSAFCA will continue to work closely with the USACE to minimize potential delays in project implementation.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS
This report demonstrates a continued commitment to achieve a 200-year level of flood protection for the City of West Sacramento. WSAFCA has advanced early project features in partnership with the State prior to federal participation and has received federal funding in FY 2019, FY 2020, FY 2021, FY 2022, and FY 2023. Successful completion of the WSLIP by 2040 will rely on the ability to secure additional planned federal, State, and local appropriations to construct the remaining features. WSAFCA will continue to work closely with its State and Federal partners to ensure the project is completed prior to the ULOP deadline.

The local funding appropriated to date is 102% (Table 3, Column C) of the planned expenses through June 2025. Cumulative local, State, and Federal actual expenditures are 99% (Table 4) of the planned expenditures through June 2025 as compared to the 2023 AAPR. The next AAPR will rely on the revised planned expenditures and appropriations presented in the 2024-2025 AAPR as the baseline for demonstrating that the City is making adequate progress toward providing a minimum 200-year level of flood protection. 276

Page 11 of 16 ends

6.0 REFERENCES
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. West Sacramento Project Total Project Cost Estimate, June 27, 2025.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2023. City of West Sacramento Annual Adequate Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, July 2024.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2022. City of West Sacramento Annual Adequate Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, May 2023.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2021. City of West Sacramento Annual Adequate Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, November 2021.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2020. City of West Sacramento Annual Adequate Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, September 2020.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2019. City of West Sacramento Annual Adequate Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, October 2019.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2018. City of West Sacramento Annual Adequate Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, September 2018.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2017. City of West Sacramento Annual Adequate Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, September 2017.
• West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency. 2016. City of West Sacramento Annual Progress Report. Prepared by West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, June 2016. • Wood Rodgers. 2016a. West Sacramento Problem Identification Report. Prepared for the City of West Sacramento. June.
• Wood Rodgers. 2016b. West Sacramento Alternatives Analysis Report. Prepared for the City of West Sacramento. June.
• Larsen Wurzel and Associates. 2016. Urban Level of Protection Financial Plan. May. • DWR. 2010a. Implementing California Flood Legislation into Local Land Use Planning: A Handbook for Local Communities. October. Available at:
http://www.water.ca.gov/floodmgmt/lrafmo/fmb/docs/Oct2010_DWR_Handbook_web .pdf.
• DWR. 2010b. State Plan of Flood Control Descriptive Document. Central Valley Flood Management Planning Program. FloodSAFE. November. Available at:
http://www.cvfpb.ca.gov/DescriptiveDocNov2010/.
• DWR. 2012. Urban Levee Design Criteria. May. Available at:
http://water.ca.gov/floodsafe/leveedesign/ULDC_May2012.pdf. • DWR. 2013. Urban Level of Flood Protection Criteria. November. Available at:
http://water.ca.gov/floodsafe/urbancriteria/ULOP_Criteria_Nov2013.pdf. • DWR. 2014a. Guidance on General Plan Amendments for Addressing Flood Risk.

September. Available at: http://www.water.ca.gov/cvfmp/docs/DWR-2014-Guidanceon-GP-Amendments-for-Flood-Risk_SEPT2014.pdf. • DWR. 2014b. Addendum to: Implementing California Flood Legislation into Local Land Use Planning: A Handbook for Local Communities. December. Available at:
277

Page 12 of 16 ends

http://www.water.ca.gov/cvfmp/docs/Final-Addendum-to2010Handbook_12.22.2014.pdf. • USACE 2015. West Sacramento General Reevaluation Report. Final Documentation Report. Sacramento District. December. Available at:
http://www.spk.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/WestSacramento.aspx. • Final Engineers Report-West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Assessment District, PB, Jul 2007.
• West Sacramento 200-Year Flood Protection In-Lieu Fee Study, EPS, May 2007 • City of West Sacramento Sales Tax, Measure V ballot proposition, November 4, 2008 ballot for voters in the City of West Sacramento in Yolo County, California.

7.0 DOCUMENT PREPARERS
The following agencies and individuals contributed to the preparation of this plan:

West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency:

Paul Dirksen Flood Protection Manager
City of West Sacramento:

Andrea Ouse Director, Community Development
David Tilley Principal Planner, Community Development
Consultants:

Derek Larsen Larsen Wurzel & Associates
Winson Phoong Larsen Wurzel & Associates
Margaret Engesser Larsen Wurzel & Associates
278

Page 13 of 16 ends

Figure 1: Sacramento River Flood Control Project Map.
279

Page 14 of 16 ends

Figure 2: City of West Sacramento – Levee Protected Area (200-year flood event). 280

Page 15 of 16 ends

Figure 3: West Sacramento Levee System Description.
281

Page 16 of 16 ends

Figure 4: Federally Authorized West Sacramento Project. 282
1 2450 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 240 • Sacramento, CA 95833 www.larsenwurzel.com Memorandum
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency
2026 Adequate Progress Financial Plan
Prepared For: Paul Dirksen and Jenn Nguyen, WSAFCA
Prepared By: Winson Phoong
Reviewed By: Margaret Engesser and Derek Larsen, PE, CFM February 12, 2026
Background
The West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) is advancing a comprehensive program of activities referred to as the West Sacramento Levee Improvement Program (WSLIP) to reduce flood risk to the City of West Sacramento (City). This program includes: (1) partnering with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB) to implement the West Sacramento Project as authorized by Congress in the 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act; (2) partnering with the CA Department of Water Resources (DWR) in the planning, design, and construction of improvements along several high risk reaches of levee protecting the City; and (3) community outreach regarding the existing flood risk and improved emergency response planning.

The primary goal of WSAFCA is to achieve at least a 200-year urban level of flood protection (ULOP) for the City as soon as possible. Per State law, for areas that are protected by the State Plan of Flood Control levees the ULOP must be achieved by 2025. However, Senate Bill 901, enacted in 2022, revised this deadline for the City to achieve the required flood protection by 2030. Senate Bill 586, introduced in February 2023 and passed in April 2024, extends the deadline to 2040. The City adopted its initial ULOP Finding of Adequate Progress in 2016, with an effective period of ten years. WSAFCA has prepared a new Finding of Adequate Progress to demonstrate the substantial progress underway to achieve the required ULOP by 2040.

Since 2006, WSAFCA, the State and the USACE have expended approximately $383.2 million toward the planning, design, land acquisition, and construction toward completion of the 200-year Project through June 2024. WSAFCA executed a Design Funding agreement with the CVFPB and the USACE on April 5, 2019, and a Project Partnership Agreement was executed on September 7, 2022 to fund and implement the remaining federal Project by 2040.

Purpose of the Financial Plan
The purpose of this financial plan is to describe the adequate progress the city has made to reach a 200-year level of flood protection, along with demonstrating the financial ability of the City to achieve an urban level of flood protection by 2040. This is not intended to substitute for the independent judgment of the City in adopting findings. This financial plan supports the City’s 2026 Finding of Adequate Progress, which relies upon the 283
West Sacramento Project
Adequate Progress Financial Plan
February 12, 2026
2 execution of the remainder of the federally authorized West Sacramento Project, to demonstrate progress towards achieving the required flood projection by 2040.

Project Cost Share Assumptions
Early Implementation Projects
The State developed funding programs under Proposition 1E designed to quickly reduce the flood risk in California in advance of congressional authorization. The first funding programs were developed to reduce the risk of flooding in urban areas. The State developed cost share guidelines to determine the percentage of state funding that could be provided for structural improvement projects. WSAFCA secured a 90% State cost share for its Early Implementation Program (EIP) projects in the northern area of the City. Some EIP project costs were deemed ineligible for state cost share and consequently, the effective state cost share is 89% and the local share is 11%.

For the Southport EIP, WSAFCA has secured an 80% state cost share for the setback levee work and a 60% state cost share for the fix-in-place levee work. Revegetation in the offset area is funded by the FloodSAFE Environmental Stewardship and Statewide Resource Office (FESSRO) and is 100% state cost shared. From these various elements, the effective, or blended, state cost share is 77% and the local share is 23%. Table 1 provides a summary of the State and local cost shares secured to advance the EIP projects.

Federal Project
The federally authorized West Sacramento Project has a 65% federal, 35% non-federal cost share. The 35% nonfederal cost share is split between the State and WSAFCA (local project sponsor) at 70% and 30%, respectively.

The effective state and local cost share estimates (as a percentage of total project costs) for implementation of the federal project is assumed to be 25.87% and 10.61%, respectively. Table 1 provides a summary of the assumed federal, state, and local cost shares for the federal project.

The federal, state, and local cost shares to complete the WSLIP are further complicated by the fact that the West Sacramento Project General Reevaluation Report (GRR) excludes three of the North Area EIP projects completed by the State and WSAFCA – the Rivers, CHP Academy and I Street Bridge projects. Therefore, the State and WSAFCA will not be able to secure federal credit for these improvements as they are not included in the federal project. Accordingly, Assembly Bills 1147 and 1788 will not apply to work completed on those projects, and the State will not “true-up” its cost share to the federally authorized cost share for those project elements. Table 1 also provides a summary of the effective federal, state, and local cost share estimates assumed for WSLIP. 284
West Sacramento Project
Adequate Progress Financial Plan
February 12, 2026
3 Table 1: Summary of cost sharing by project.

Notes
[1] WSAFCA secured a 90% state cost share for EIP projects in the north area of the City, however, some costs were ineligible for state cost share so the effective state cost share is 89% and the local share is 11%. [2] WSAFCA secured an 80% state cost share for the setback levee work of the Southport EIP Project and a 60% state cost share for the fix in place levee work. The effective state cost share blended rate is 77% and the local cost share is 23%.
[3] The federal project will be cost shared 65% federal and 35% non-federal sponsor. The non-federal sponsor cost share is assumed to be split between the State and WSAFCA at 70%/30%, respectively. [4] The effective WSLIP cost share reflects the fact that Assembly Bills 1147 and 1788 will not apply to the north area levee project elements not included in the federally authorized project. However, they will apply to the Southport project that is in the process of securing federal credit.

Local Funds
Revenues from the Assessment provide the majority of the local funding necessary to match state and federal funding for the federal project. The Assessment also provides an additional secured funding source for the Operations & Maintenance of the existing and improved flood risk reduction facilities.

As of July 2007, new development within the City is required to demonstrate that any new structures are afforded a 200-year level of flood protection or otherwise contribute to the City’s efforts of providing 200-year flood protection, by paying a fee in-lieu of making or contributing towards physical improvements.

West Sacramento sales tax Measures U and V were approved by the citizens of West Sacramento on November 4, 2008. The City has allocated some of the sales tax revenue generated by Measure V to support the flood risk reduction improvements as part of the WSLIP and can allocate more as needed and as appropriate.

State Funds
Approximately $190.43 million has been made available to WSAFCA from Proposition 1E. This has provided the State’s cost share for structural levee improvements performed by WSAFCA and the State through the EIP, UFRR, and FESSRO programs in advance of congressional authorization of the West Sacramento Project. WSAFCA secured $162.83 million in Capital Outlay Appropriations that were administered through DWR’s EIP. A portion of the Capital Outlay appropriations were needed by DWR to fund program administration and oversight, resulting Entity
EIP
North
Area [1]
EIP
Southport
[2]
West
Sacramento
Project [3]
Effective
WSLIP
[4]
Federal 0% 0% 65.00% 63.51%
State 89% 77% 22.75% 25.87%
Local 11% 23% 12.25% 10.61%
Total 100% 100% 100.00% 100.00%
285
West Sacramento Project
Adequate Progress Financial Plan
February 12, 2026
4 in net funding available to WSAFCA of approximately $156.7 million. WSAFCA also secured an additional $28.73 million under the DWR UFRR program to fully fund the Southport Project.

Under the Local Partnership Project Partnership Agreement (LPPA), this financial plan assumes the State will provide the remaining State portion of funding required to achieve a 200-year level of protection by 2040 through implementation of the federal West Sacramento Project.

Federal Funding
This financial plan assumes that the federal government will provide the additional funding required to achieve a 200-year level of protection by 2040 through the federal West Sacramento Project. This financial plan uses the USACE Total Project Cost Estimate, dated June 2025, to project remaining Federal appropriations through 2040.

Federal Credit Estimate
The GRR identifies the alignment of the Southport setback levee and the Interim Village Parkway as part of the National Economic Development (NED) Alternative. The USACE Sacramento District Commander executed the Section 221 Credit Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) in July 2014. The Section 221 Credit MOU allows the local sponsor to secure credit for construction of the NED Alternative in advance of federal authorization if the work is determined to be integral to the project. To be integral to a study or project, the material or service must be part of the work that the Federal Government would otherwise have undertaken for the study or for construction of what is ultimately determined to be the Federal Project. Any Lands, Easements, Rights of Way, Relocations, and Disposal sites (LERRDs) associated with in-kind contributions determined to be integral to the project will be credited to the project as such. Given that the NED Alternative has been endorsed for implementation, the likelihood of securing Section 221 credit is significantly high. WSAFCA estimates that $188.3 million in Section 221 credit will accrue for the Southport Project. This financial plan assumes that the USACE will afford 65% of the $188.3 million as Section 221 credit to be applied toward the federal project, or approximately $122.4 million. This financial plan assumes the Section 221 credit will be shared between the State and WSAFCA based on the same cost sharing percentage as the Southport Project.

Program Cost Assumptions
WSAFCA’s current estimated cost to achieve the State required 200-year level of protection is approximately $2.1 billion. A summary of the program cost estimate is shown in Table 2. 200-Year Project
The 200-year project cost is based on the following: USACE’s Total Project Cost Estimate for the West Sacramento Project, the actual project costs for the I Street, CHP Academy, the Rivers, and Southport Project EIPs, the design and construction costs for the Yolo Bypass Levee, and design costs for the Sacramento River North Levee. The estimates to complete both the state-local led portion and federal portions of the 200-year WSLIP are presented 286
West Sacramento Project
Adequate Progress Financial Plan
February 12, 2026
5 below in Table 2. The state-local led portion of the project is assumed to cost $225.2 million ($36.9 million + $188.3 million) and the federal project is assumed to cost approximately $1.875 billion for a total program cost of $2.1 billion.

Table 2: WSLIP Cost Estimate by State-Local Led Projects and Federal Led Project.

Notes
[A] State and Local-led Project costs are based on actual costs to complete the Rivers (Sacramento River West North) and CHP Academy (Sacramento Bypass) projects. These project features were completed under section 408 and the USACE did not include them in the West Sacramento GRR, therefore they are not creditable against the federal project. [B] State and Local-led Project costs based on actual and projected costs to close out the Southport Project. Identified projects constructed by the State under EIP and UFRR programs.
[C] Remaining Federal Project cost estimate based on the USACE’s Total Project Cost Estimate dated June 2025.

Funding Sources
Assumptions regarding WSAFCA’s ability to secure federal appropriations and state funding will affect its implementation strategy. The multiple funding sources developed by WSAFCA allow the agency to continue advancing flood risk reduction projects under different state and federal funding assumptions. A more detailed Levee Reach
State-Local Work
Excluded Fed.

Auth.
[A]
State-Local Work
Included Fed.

Auth.
[B]
USACE Est.

Federal Led
Project
[C]
WSAFCA WSLIP 200-year
Estimate
[D = A + B + C]
USACE
Total Project
Cost Estimate
[E]
North Basin
Sac River West North Levee-Rivers $22,052,000 $514,782,000 $536,834,000 $514,782,000 Sac River West North Levee-I Street $3,134,000 $3,134,000 $0 Training Dike $25,720,000 $25,720,000 $25,720,000
Sacramento Bypass-CHP Academy $11,734,000 $11,734,000 $0 Yolo Bypass $28,777,000 $28,777,000 $28,777,000
Port North Levee $25,324,000 $25,324,000 $25,324,000
Closure Structure $0
Stone Lock Structure $174,846,000 $174,846,000 $174,846,000 Sub-Total North Basin $36,920,000 $0 $769,449,000 $806,369,000 $769,449,000 South Basin
Sac River West South Levee $188,320,000 $188,320,000 $177,219,000 Deep Water Ship Channel West $779,232,000 $779,232,000 $779,232,000 Deep Water Ship Channel East $242,312,000 $242,312,000 $242,312,000 Port South Levee $17,503,000 $17,503,000 $17,503,000
South Cross Levee $66,762,000 $66,762,000 $66,762,000
Sub-Total South Basin $0 $188,320,000 $1,105,809,000 $1,294,129,000 $1,283,028,000 Total $36,920,000 $188,320,000 $1,875,258,000 $2,100,498,000 $2,052,477,000 Levee Reach
Federal Share of Project $1,334,110,050 $1,334,110,050
State Share of Project [1] $543,486,365 $502,856,865
Local Share of Project [2] $222,901,585 $215,510,085
Total $2,100,498,000 $2,052,477,000
287
West Sacramento Project
Adequate Progress Financial Plan
February 12, 2026
6 description of the assumptions used to develop this financial plan and implementation strategy are described below.

Funding Sources
To date, WSAFCA has used annual Assessment revenues to directly pay for improvements as well as service bond issuances. Special Taxes and Assessments of approximately $85.8 million have been secured through June 2024 and WSAFCA is projecting $164.1 million in total annual Assessments to be collected from inception in 2006 through June 2035. Bond proceeds totaling $41.2 million ($9.2 million in 2008, $12.0 million in 2011, $10 million in 2015, and $10 million in 2020) have been secured to date. The City of West Sacramento has made available to WSAFCA $33 million in Measure V funding to date and an additional $40 million remaining in Lieu fee to fund the local portion of the 200-year Project. Table 3 summarizes the local funding sources assumed to complete the WSLIP and provide the City with a minimum of a 200-year level of protection.

Table 3: WSAFCA funding sources.

Notes:
[1] Projections based on previous year collections with a 2% annual increase in assessment revenue. [2] Other local funding sources will be secured through existing sources such as the in-lieu fee (approximately $40M available), sales tax measures, or through the development of a new local funding source. [3] $33 million from Measure V funding is available, if needed.

WSLIP Implementation Plan
The total cost of the WSLIP is estimated to be $2.1 billion. The total cost of the I Street Bridge, CHP Academy, and Rivers projects is $36.9 million. The total cost of the EIP portion of the WSLIP is estimated to be $225.2 million.

The estimated cost to complete the federally led portion of the WSLIP is projected to be $1.875 billion based on the cost estimate prepared by the USACE in June 2025.

This financial plan demonstrates the ability of WSAFCA to fund the local share of the WSLIP and it is assumed that the State will be able to appropriate funding to match future federal appropriations.

Funding Sources
Special Tax/Assessment [1] $164,075,857
2008 Bond Proceeds $9,187,418
2011 Bond Proceeds $12,000,000
2015 Bond Proceeds $10,000,000
2020 Bond Proceeds $10,000,000
Other Local Funding (New Assessment, Sales Tax, In-Lieu Fee, etc.) [2] $41,000,000 Measure V [3] $33,000,000
Total Funding Sources $279,263,274
288
West Sacramento Project
Adequate Progress Financial Plan
February 12, 2026
7 Federal appropriations are next assumed to be secured for federal fiscal year 2027 and continue annually through 2034, except for 2031-2032 (Table 4). WSAFCA has secured approximately $150.41 million in federal funding for planning, engineering, and design activities through fiscal year 2024-25. For this analysis, it is assumed that the Federal Government will be able to provide total appropriations to the West Sacramento Project of approximately $1.184 billion between fiscal years 2027-2034. After accounting for the application of federal credit for the Southport Project, it is assumed that WSAFCA will be required to provide an additional $163.4 million and the State will be required to provide an additional $365.9 million to complete the federal project. WSAFCA is relying on planned federal and State appropriations to achieve a minimum 200-year level of flood protection for the City by 2040. Table 4 describes the current WSLIP program projected costs for the state-local led projects and future costs for the federal project through 2040.
289
8 2450 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 240 • Sacramento, CA 95833 www.larsenwurzel.com Table 4: WSLIP 200-year actual FY 2024-25 expenditures and projections through the remainder of the federal project.

Summary of federal, State and Local Expenditures 2006-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31 2031-32 2032-33 2033-34 2034-35 2035-36 2036-37 2037-38 Totals Federal Share $150,410,297 $0 $0 $0 $111,800,000 $221,400,000 $24,800,000 $18,900,000 $0 $784,400,000 $22,399,753 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,334,110,050 State Share [1] $174,607,296 $2,964,364 $6,145,249 $6,145,249 $30,434,444 $60,270,000 $6,751,111 $5,145,000 $6,145,249 $213,531,111 $6,097,711 $6,145,249 $6,145,249 $6,145,249 $6,813,831 $543,486,365 Local Share [1] $58,188,763 $1,270,442 $3,580,048 $3,580,048 $13,043,333 $25,830,000 $2,893,333 $2,205,000 $3,580,048 $91,513,333 $2,613,305 $3,580,048 $3,580,048 $3,580,048 $3,863,786 $222,901,585 Subtotal Capital federal, State and Local Expenditures $383,206,356 $4,234,805 $9,725,298 $9,725,298 $155,277,778 $307,500,000 $34,444,444 $26,250,000 $9,725,298 $1,089,444,444 $31,110,768 $9,725,298 $9,725,298 $9,725,298 $10,677,617 $2,100,498,000 Cumulative Expenditures $383,206,356 $387,441,161 $397,166,459 $406,891,757 $562,169,535 $869,669,535 $904,113,979 $930,363,979 $940,089,277 $2,029,533,721 $2,060,644,489 $2,070,369,787 $2,080,095,085 $2,089,820,383 $2,100,498,000 Commented [DL1]: @Winson Phoong We should talk about
how we want to spread the federal dollars. Some of those values are eye popping for any one given year.

Commented [ME2R1]: @Derek Larsen the spread of federal
funding is based on the USACE funding stream provided by Mark Hall in October.
290
9 2450 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 240 • Sacramento, CA 95833 www.larsenwurzel.com References and Supporting Documentation
• Final Engineers Report-West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency Assessment District, PB, Jul 2007. • West Sacramento 200-Year Flood Protection In-Lieu Fee Study, EPS, May 2007 • City of West Sacramento Sales Tax, Measure V ballot proposition, November 4, 2008 ballot for voters in the City of West Sacramento in Yolo County, California. • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. West Sacramento Project Total Project Cost Estimate, June 27, 2025. • Assembly Bill 1147 and Assembly Bill 1788 cost-sharing regulations. See Cal. Water Code § 12585.7 and implementing regulations at 23 C.C.R. §§ 570-576.
• Public Laws 99-662 and 106-53.
291

WALLA WALLA COST ENGINEERING

MANDATORY CENTER OF EXPERTISE

COST AGENCY TECHNICAL REVIEW

CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
SPK - PN 456851
West Sacramento GRR Project
West Sacramento, CA
The West Sacramento GRR Project cost update, as presented by the Sacramento District, has undergone a successful Cost Agency Technical Review (Cost ATR) of remaining costs, performed by the Walla Walla District Cost Engineering Mandatory Center of Expertise (Cost MCX) team. The Cost ATR included study of the project scope, report, cost estimates, schedules, escalation, and risk-based contingencies. This certification signifies the cost products meet the quality standards as prescribed in ER 1110-2-1150 Engineering and Design for Civil Works Projects and ER 1110-2-1302 Civil Works Cost Engineering.

Certification Date: June 27, 2025,
FY25 Remaining Costs: $1,599,092,000 (Cost ATR Certified) FY25 Spent Costs: $ 25,324,000 (From Programs & PM)
FY25 Project First Cost: $1,624,415,000 (Remaining plus Spent) Fully Funded Costs: $2,052,477,000 including Spent Costs Note: Cost Certification assumes Efficient Implementation (Funding). Cost ATR was devoted to remaining work. It did not review spent costs, which requires an audit process. It remains the responsibility of the District to correctly reflect these cost values and to implement effective project management controls and implementation procedures including risk management through the period of Federal participation.

Derek D. Nelson, TCCC
Acting Chief, Cost Engineering MCX
Walla Walla District
292
**** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 1 of 11 ends

PROJECT: DISTRICT: SPK Sacramento District PREPARED: 4/29/2025 PROJECT NO 456851 PED POC: CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, Theresa Gneiting-JamesLOCATION: West Sacramento, CA This Estimate reflects the scope and schedule in report; West Sac PED Program Year (Budget EC): 2025
Effective Price Level Date: 1 OCT 24
Spent Thru:

WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL 3-Apr-24 INFLATED COST CNTG FULL NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K)

A BC D E F G H I J K L M N O
02 RELOCATIONS $50,834 $18,360 36% $69,194 0.0% $50,834 $18,360 $69,194 $0 $69,194 21.5% $61,084 $22,973 $84,05706 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $35,540 $8,620 24% $44,160 0.0% $35,540 $8,620 $44,160 $0 $44,160 20.1% $42,463 $10,559 $53,02211 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS $460,844 $125,585 27% $586,429 0.0% $460,844 $125,585 $586,429 $13,730 $600,159 25.1% $575,925 $157,807 $747,46316 BANK STABILIZATION $235,789 $66,021 28% $301,810 0.0% $235,789 $66,021 $301,810 $0 $301,810 32.3% $311,924 $87,339 $399,26218 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $12,152 $2,364 19% $14,516 0.0% $12,152 $2,364 $14,516 $0 $14,516 13.5% $13,679 $2,791 $16,471 ____________ __________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ______________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $795,159 $220,950 $1,016,109 0.0% $795,159 $220,950 $1,016,109 $13,730 $1,029,839 26.6% $1,005,075 $281,469 $1,300,274 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $152,147 $48,970 32% $201,117 0.0% $152,147 $48,970 $201,117 $17 $201,133 16.0% $174,287 $59,083 $233,38730 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN $185,232 $47,641 26% $232,873 0.0% $185,232 $47,641 $232,873 $11,577 $244,450 31.9% $243,113 $64,058 $318,74831 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT $118,007 $30,987 26% $148,994 0.0% $118,007 $30,987 $148,994 $0 $148,994 34.3% $157,894 $42,174 $200,068 PROJECT COST TOTALS: $1,250,545 $348,547 28% $1,599,092 $1,250,545 $348,547 $1,599,092 $25,324 $1,624,415 26.8% $1,580,370 $446,784 $2,052,477 CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, Theresa Gneiting-James
ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COST: $2,052,477
PROGRAM MANAGER, Mark Hall CHIEF, REAL ESTATE, Adam Olson CHIEF, ENGINEERING, Mark DeRocchi PREVIOUS TPCS: $ 1,173,819 DATED: 21-Oct-20
THE TPCS REFLECTS A PROJECT COST CHANGE OF: $ 878,658
THE 902 COST LIMITS ARE
AUTHORIZED COST PLUS INFLATION: $ 2,142,828
902 LIMIT: $ 2,385,554
DATED: 29-Apr-25
O&M OUTSIDE OF TOTAL PROJECT COST: N/A
West Sacramento
Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)

TOTAL FIRST
COST

PROJECT FIRST COST
(Constant Dollar Basis)
Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 293 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 2 of 11 ends

RISK BASED
WBS COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL Mid-Point INFLATED COST CNTG FULL NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) Date (%) ($K) ($K) ($K)

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
Training Dike
06 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $570 $160 28% $730 0.0% $570 $160 $730 2034Q4 28.5% $732 $205 $93716 BANK STABILIZATION $10,412 $2,915 28% $13,327 0.0% $10,412 $2,915 $13,327 2034Q4 28.5% $13,376 $3,745 $17,12118 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $53 $15 28% $68 0.0% $53 $15 $68 2034Q4 28.5% $68 $19 $87 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $11,035 $3,090 28% $14,125 $11,035 $3,090 $14,125 $14,176 $3,969 $18,145 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $252 $128 45% $380 0.0% $252 $128 $380 2033Q4 25.2% $316 $161 $47630 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $552 $155 28% $707 0.0% $552 $155 $707 2034Q4 35.9% $750 $210 $960

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $115 $32 28% $147 0.0% $115 $32 $147 2034Q4 35.9% $156 $44 $200

5.0% Engineering & Design $552 $155 28% $707 0.0% $552 $155 $707 2034Q4 35.9% $750 $210 $960

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $115 $32 28% $147 0.0% $115 $32 $147 2034Q4 35.9% $156 $44 $200

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $115 $32 28% $147 0.0% $115 $32 $147 2034Q4 35.9% $156 $44 $200

1.0% Contracting & Reprographics $115 $32 28% $147 0.0% $115 $32 $147 2034Q4 35.9% $156 $44 $200

5.0% Engineering During Construction $552 $155 28% $707 0.0% $552 $155 $707 2034Q4 35.9% $750 $210 $960

1.6% Planning During Construction $177 $50 28% $227 0.0% $177 $50 $227 2034Q4 35.9% $240 $67 $308

1.6% Real Estate $76 $34 45% $110 0.0% $76 $34 $110 2034Q4 35.9% $103 $46 $150

1.0% Project Operations $115 $32 28% $147 0.0% $115 $32 $147 2034Q4 35.9% $156 $44 $200 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $1,104 $309 28% $1,413 0.0% $1,104 $309 $1,413 2034Q4 35.9% $1,500 $420 $1,920

1.2% Project Operation: $137 $38 28% $175 0.0% $137 $38 $175 2034Q4 35.9% $186 $52 $238

3.1% Project Management $347 $97 28% $444 0.0% $347 $97 $444 2034Q4 35.9% $471 $132 $603 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $15,359 $4,371 $19,730 $15,359 $4,371 $19,730 $20,023 $5,696 $25,720

TRAINING DIKE

ESTIMATED COST
Estimate Prepared:

Effective Price Level:

Program Year (Budget EC):

Effective Price Level Date:

West Sacramento
TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED) PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis) Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 294 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 3 of 11 ends

**** CONTRACT COST SUMMARY ****
PROJECT: DISTRICT: SPK Sacramento District PREPARED: 4/29/2025 LOCATION: West Sacramento, CA POC: CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, Theresa Gneiting-JamesThis Estimate reflects the scope and schedule in report; West Sac PED 29-Apr-25 2025
1-Oct-24 1 OCT 24
WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL Mid-Point INFLATED COST CNTG FULL NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) Date (%) ($K) ($K) ($K)

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
Yolo Bypass - North & SOUTH
02 RELOCATIONS $259 $117 45% $376 0.0% $259 $117 $376 2025Q1 0.0% $259 $117 $37606 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $2,000 $560 28% $2,560 0.0% $2,000 $560 $2,560 2025Q1 0.0% $2,000 $560 $2,56011 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS - NORTH $912 $2,669 28% $3,581 0.0% $912 $2,669 $3,581 2025Q1 0.0% $912 $2,669 $3,58111 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS - SOUTH $10,865 $4,151 28% $15,016 0.0% $10,865 $4,151 $15,016 2025Q1 0.0% $10,865 $4,151 $15,01616 BANK STABILIZATION $0 $0 28% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $018 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $0 $0 28% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $009 CHANNELS & CANALS $0 $0 28% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $010 BREAKWATER & SEAWALLS $0 $0 28% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $14,036 $7,496 53% $21,532 $14,036 $7,496 $21,532 $14,036 $7,496 $21,532 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $273 $162 45% $435 0.0% $273 $162 $435 2025Q1 0.0% $273 $162 $43530 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $702 $197 28% $899 0.0% $702 $197 $899 2025Q1 0.0% $702 $197 $899

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $147 $41 28% $188 0.0% $147 $41 $188 2025Q1 0.0% $147 $41 $188

5.0% Engineering & Design $702 $197 28% $899 0.0% $702 $197 $899 2025Q1 0.0% $702 $197 $899

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $147 $41 28% $188 0.0% $147 $41 $188 2025Q1 0.0% $147 $41 $188

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $147 $41 28% $188 0.0% $147 $41 $188 2025Q1 0.0% $147 $41 $1881.0% Contracting & Reprographics $147 $41 28% $188 0.0% $147 $41 $188 2025Q1 0.0% $147 $41 $188

5.0% Engineering During Construction $702 $197 28% $899 0.0% $702 $197 $899 2025Q1 0.0% $702 $197 $899

1.6% Planning During Construction $225 $63 28% $288 0.0% $225 $63 $288 2025Q1 0.0% $225 $63 $288

1.6% Real Estate NFS Oversight $207 $93 45% $300 0.0% $207 $93 $300 2025Q1 0.0% $207 $93 $300

1.0% Project Operations $147 $41 28% $188 0.0% $147 $41 $188 2025Q1 0.0% $147 $41 $188 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $1,404 $393 28% $1,797 0.0% $1,404 $393 $1,797 2025Q1 0.0% $1,404 $393 $1,797

1.2% Project Operation: $175 $49 28% $224 0.0% $175 $49 $224 2025Q1 0.0% $175 $49 $224

3.1% Project Management $441 $123 28% $564 0.0% $441 $123 $564 2025Q1 0.0% $441 $123 $564 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $19,602 $9,175 $28,777 $19,602 $9,175 $28,777 $19,602 $9,175 $28,777

YOLO BYPASS - NORTH & SOUTH
In Construction
Estimate Prepared: Program Year (Budget EC):

Effective Price Level: Effective Price Level Date:

West Sacramento
ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis) Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED) Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 295 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 5 of 11 ends

**** CONTRACT COST SUMMARY ****
PROJECT: West Sacramento DISTRICT: SPK Sacramento District PREPARED: 4/29/2025 LOCATION: West Sacramento, CA POC: CHIEF, COST ENGINEERING, Theresa Gneiting-JamesThis Estimate reflects the scope and schedule in report; West Sac PED 29-Apr-25 Program Year (Budget EC): 2025
1-Oct-24 Effective Price Level Date: 1 OCT 24 FULLY FUNDED PROJECT ESTIMATE WBS Civil Works COST CNTG CNTG TOTAL ESC COST CNTG TOTAL Mid-Point INFLATED COST CNTG FULL NUMBER Feature & Sub-Feature Description ($K) ($K) (%) ($K) (%) ($K) ($K) ($K) Date (%) ($K) ($K) ($K)

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
Lock Closure Levee
02 RELOCATIONS $105 $47 45% $152 0.0% $105 $47 $152 2032Q3 21.2% $127 $57 $18511 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS $81,289 $22,761 28% $104,050 0.0% $81,289 $22,761 $104,050 2032Q3 21.2% $98,562 $27,597 $126,16018 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $210 $59 28% $269 0.0% $210 $59 $269 2032Q3 21.2% $255 $71 $326 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $81,604 $22,867 28% $104,471 $81,604 $22,867 $104,471 $98,944 $27,726 $126,670 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $137 $72 45% $209 0.0% $137 $72 $209 2031Q3 18.2% $162 $85 $24730 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $4,080 $1,143 28% $5,223 0.0% $4,080 $1,143 $5,223 2032Q3 26.5% $5,160 $1,446 $6,605

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $852 $239 28% $1,091 0.0% $852 $239 $1,091 2032Q3 26.5% $1,077 $302 $1,379

5.0% Engineering & Design $4,080 $1,143 28% $5,223 0.0% $4,080 $1,143 $5,223 2032Q3 26.5% $5,160 $1,446 $6,605

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $852 $239 28% $1,091 0.0% $852 $239 $1,091 2032Q3 26.5% $1,077 $302 $1,379

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $852 $239 28% $1,091 0.0% $852 $239 $1,091 2032Q3 26.5% $1,077 $302 $1,379

1.0% Contracting & Reprographics $852 $239 28% $1,091 0.0% $852 $239 $1,091 2032Q3 26.5% $1,077 $302 $1,379

5.0% Engineering During Construction $4,080 $1,143 28% $5,223 0.0% $4,080 $1,143 $5,223 2032Q3 26.5% $5,160 $1,446 $6,605

1.6% Planning During Construction $1,306 $366 28% $1,672 0.0% $1,306 $366 $1,672 2032Q3 26.5% $1,652 $463 $2,114

1.6% Real Estate NFS Oversight $51 $23 45% $74 0.0% $51 $23 $74 2032Q3 26.5% $64 $29 $94

1.0% Project Operations $852 $239 28% $1,091 0.0% $852 $239 $1,091 2032Q3 26.5% $1,077 $302 $1,379 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $8,160 $2,287 28% $10,447 0.0% $8,160 $2,287 $10,447 2032Q3 26.5% $10,319 $2,892 $13,211

1.2% Project Operation: $1,015 $284 28% $1,299 0.0% $1,015 $284 $1,299 2032Q3 26.5% $1,284 $360 $1,643

3.1% Project Management $2,566 $719 28% $3,285 0.0% $2,566 $719 $3,285 2032Q3 26.5% $3,245 $909 $4,154 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $111,339 $31,241 $142,580 $111,339 $31,241 $142,580 $136,536 $38,310 $174,846

LOCK CLOSURE LEVEE

TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)
Estimate Prepared:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis) Effective Price Level:

Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 296 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 6 of 11 ends

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
DWSC West 0+00 - 1002+60
02 RELOCATIONS $1,759 $792 45% $2,551 0.0% $1,759 $792 $2,551 2036Q2 33.5% $2,348 $1,057 $3,40506 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $605 $169 28% $774 0.0% $605 $169 $774 2036Q2 33.5% $808 $226 $1,03411 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS $123,447 $34,565 28% $158,012 0.0% $123,447 $34,565 $158,012 2036Q2 33.5% $164,787 $46,140 $210,92816 BANK STABILIZATION $206,546 $57,833 28% $264,379 0.0% $206,546 $57,833 $264,379 2036Q2 33.5% $275,716 $77,200 $352,91618 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $2,075 $581 28% $2,656 0.0% $2,075 $581 $2,656 2036Q2 33.5% $2,770 $776 $3,545 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $334,432 $93,940 28% $428,372 $334,432 $93,940 $428,372 $446,429 $125,399 $571,828 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $3,631 $1,688 45% $5,319 0.0% $3,631 $1,688 $5,319 2035Q2 30.1% $4,724 $2,196 $6,92030 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $10,922 $3,068 28% $13,990 0.0% $10,922 $3,068 $13,990 2036Q2 42.5% $15,569 $4,373 $19,942

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $3,491 $981 28% $4,472 0.0% $3,491 $981 $4,472 2036Q2 42.5% $4,976 $1,398 $6,374

5.0% Engineering & Design $16,722 $4,697 28% $21,419 0.0% $16,722 $4,697 $21,419 2036Q2 42.5% $23,836 $6,695 $30,531

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $3,491 $981 28% $4,472 0.0% $3,491 $981 $4,472 2036Q2 42.5% $4,976 $1,398 $6,374

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $3,491 $981 28% $4,472 0.0% $3,491 $981 $4,472 2036Q2 42.5% $4,976 $1,398 $6,374

1.0% Contracting & Reprographics $3,491 $981 28% $4,472 0.0% $3,491 $981 $4,472 2036Q2 42.5% $4,976 $1,398 $6,3745.0% Engineering During Construction $10,922 $3,068 28% $13,990 0.0% $10,922 $3,068 $13,990 2036Q2 42.5% $15,569 $4,373 $19,942

1.6% Planning During Construction $5,351 $1,503 28% $6,854 0.0% $5,351 $1,503 $6,854 2036Q2 42.5% $7,627 $2,143 $9,770

1.6% Real Estate NFS Oversight $278 $125 45% $403 0.0% $278 $125 $403 2036Q2 42.5% $396 $178 $575

1.0% Project Operations $3,491 $981 28% $4,472 0.0% $3,491 $981 $4,472 2036Q2 42.5% $4,976 $1,398 $6,374 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $33,443 $9,394 28% $42,837 0.0% $33,443 $9,394 $42,837 2036Q2 42.5% $47,671 $13,390 $61,061

1.2% Project Operation: $4,160 $1,169 28% $5,329 0.0% $4,160 $1,169 $5,329 2036Q2 42.5% $5,930 $1,666 $7,595

3.1% Project Management $10,515 $2,954 28% $13,469 0.0% $10,515 $2,954 $13,469 2036Q2 42.5% $14,988 $4,210 $19,199 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $447,831 $126,508 $574,339 $447,831 $126,508 $574,339 $607,620 $171,613 $779,232

DWSC - WEST
Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED) Estimate Prepared:

Effective Price Level:

Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 297 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 7 of 11 ends

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
South Cross Levee
02 RELOCATIONS $1,711 $770 45% $2,481 0.0% $1,711 $770 $2,481 2037Q1 36.1% $2,328 $1,048 $3,37606 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $4,966 $1,390 28% $6,356 0.0% $4,966 $1,390 $6,356 2037Q1 36.1% $6,757 $1,892 $8,64911 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS $17,048 $4,773 28% $21,821 0.0% $17,048 $4,773 $21,821 2037Q1 36.1% $23,197 $6,495 $29,69218 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $193 $54 28% $247 0.0% $193 $54 $247 2037Q1 36.1% $263 $74 $336 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $23,918 $6,988 29% $30,906 $23,918 $6,988 $30,906 $32,544 $9,508 $42,052 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $3,710 $1,768 45% $5,478 0.0% $3,710 $1,768 $5,478 2037Q1 36.1% $5,048 $2,405 $7,45330 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $1,196 $335 28% $1,531 0.0% $1,196 $335 $1,531 2037Q1 46.0% $1,746 $489 $2,235

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $250 $70 28% $320 0.0% $250 $70 $320 2037Q1 46.0% $365 $102 $467

5.0% Engineering & Design $1,196 $335 28% $1,531 0.0% $1,196 $335 $1,531 2037Q1 46.0% $1,746 $489 $2,235

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $250 $70 28% $320 0.0% $250 $70 $320 2037Q1 46.0% $365 $102 $467

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $250 $70 28% $320 0.0% $250 $70 $320 2037Q1 46.0% $365 $102 $467

1.0% Contracting & Reprographics $250 $70 28% $320 0.0% $250 $70 $320 2037Q1 46.0% $365 $102 $467

5.0% Engineering During Construction $1,196 $335 28% $1,531 0.0% $1,196 $335 $1,531 2037Q1 46.0% $1,746 $489 $2,235

1.6% Planning During Construction $383 $107 28% $490 0.0% $383 $107 $490 2037Q1 46.0% $559 $157 $716

1.6% Real Estate NFS Oversight $506 $228 45% $734 0.0% $506 $228 $734 2037Q1 46.0% $739 $332 $1,071

1.0% Project Operations $250 $70 28% $320 0.0% $250 $70 $320 2037Q1 46.0% $365 $102 $467 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $2,392 $670 28% $3,062 0.0% $2,392 $670 $3,062 2037Q1 46.0% $3,491 $978 $4,469

1.2% Project Operation: $298 $83 28% $381 0.0% $298 $83 $381 2037Q1 46.0% $435 $122 $557

3.1% Project Management $752 $211 28% $963 0.0% $752 $211 $963 2037Q1 46.0% $1,098 $307 $1,405 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $36,797 $11,409 $48,206 $36,797 $11,409 $48,206 $50,976 $15,786 $66,762

TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)
Estimate Prepared:

Effective Price Level:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis)

SOUTH CROSS LEVEE
Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 298 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 8 of 11 ends

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
Port South
02 RELOCATIONS $0 $0 28% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $006 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $526 $147 28% $673 0.0% $526 $147 $673 2037Q4 38.7% $730 $204 $93411 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS $6,319 $1,769 28% $8,088 0.0% $6,319 $1,769 $8,088 2037Q4 38.7% $8,767 $2,455 $11,22218 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $54 $15 28% $69 0.0% $54 $15 $69 2037Q4 38.7% $75 $21 $96 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $6,899 $1,932 28% $8,831 $6,899 $1,932 $8,831 $9,572 $2,680 $12,252 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $161 $106 45% $267 0.0% $161 $106 $267 2036Q4 35.2% $218 $144 $36230 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $345 $97 28% $442 0.0% $345 $97 $442 2037Q4 49.5% $516 $144 $660

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $72 $20 28% $92 0.0% $72 $20 $92 2037Q4 49.5% $108 $30 $138

5.0% Engineering & Design $345 $97 28% $442 0.0% $345 $97 $442 2037Q4 49.5% $516 $144 $660

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $72 $20 28% $92 0.0% $72 $20 $92 2037Q4 49.5% $108 $30 $138

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $72 $20 28% $92 0.0% $72 $20 $92 2037Q4 49.5% $108 $30 $1381.0% Contracting & Reprographics $72 $20 28% $92 0.0% $72 $20 $92 2037Q4 49.5% $108 $30 $138

5.0% Engineering During Construction $345 $97 28% $442 0.0% $345 $97 $442 2037Q4 49.5% $516 $144 $660

1.6% Planning During Construction $110 $31 28% $141 0.0% $110 $31 $141 2037Q4 49.5% $164 $46 $210

1.6% Real Estate NFS Oversight $51 $23 45% $74 0.0% $51 $23 $74 2037Q4 49.5% $76 $34 $111

1.0% Project Operations $72 $20 28% $92 0.0% $72 $20 $92 2037Q4 49.5% $108 $30 $138 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $690 $193 28% $883 0.0% $690 $193 $883 2037Q4 49.5% $1,031 $289 $1,320

1.2% Project Operation: $86 $24 28% $110 0.0% $86 $24 $110 2037Q4 49.5% $129 $36 $165

3.1% Project Management $217 $61 28% $278 0.0% $217 $61 $278 2037Q4 49.5% $324 $91 $415 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $9,609 $2,761 $12,370 $9,609 $2,761 $12,370 $13,599 $3,904 $17,503 Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED) Estimate Prepared:

Effective Price Level:

PORT SOUTH
Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 299 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 9 of 11 ends

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
DWSC East - 0+00 - 171+71
02 RELOCATIONS $8,377 $3,770 45% $12,147 0.0% $8,377 $3,770 $12,147 2037Q3 37.9% $11,548 $5,197 $16,74506 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $5,059 $1,417 28% $6,476 0.0% $5,059 $1,417 $6,476 2037Q3 37.9% $6,974 $1,953 $8,92711 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS $79,507 $22,262 28% $101,769 0.0% $79,507 $22,262 $101,769 2037Q3 37.9% $109,602 $30,689 $140,29118 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $816 $228 28% $1,044 0.0% $816 $228 $1,044 2037Q3 37.9% $1,125 $315 $1,440 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $93,759 $27,677 30% 121,436 $93,759 $27,677 $121,436 $129,249 $38,153 $167,402 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $4,939 $2,291 45% $ 7,230 0.0% $4,939 $2,291 $7,230 2036Q3 34.4% $6,636 $3,078 $9,71430 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $4,688 $1,313 28% $6,001 0.0% $4,688 $1,313 $6,001 2037Q3 48.3% $6,951 $1,946 $8,898

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $979 $274 28% $1,253 0.0% $979 $274 $1,253 2037Q3 48.3% $1,452 $406 $1,858

5.0% Engineering & Design $4,688 $1,313 28% $6,001 0.0% $4,688 $1,313 $6,001 2037Q3 48.3% $6,951 $1,946 $8,898

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $979 $274 28% $1,253 0.0% $979 $274 $1,253 2037Q3 48.3% $1,452 $406 $1,858

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $979 $274 28% $1,253 0.0% $979 $274 $1,253 2037Q3 48.3% $1,452 $406 $1,858

1.0% Contracting & Reprographics $979 $274 28% $1,253 0.0% $979 $274 $1,253 2037Q3 48.3% $1,452 $406 $1,858

5.0% Engineering During Construction $4,688 $1,313 28% $6,001 0.0% $4,688 $1,313 $6,001 2037Q3 48.3% $6,951 $1,946 $8,898

1.6% Planning During Construction $1,500 $420 28% $1,920 0.0% $1,500 $420 $1,920 2037Q3 48.3% $2,224 $623 $2,847

1.6% Real Estate NFS Oversight $354 $159 45% $513 0.0% $354 $159 $513 2037Q3 48.3% $525 $236 $761

1.0% Project Operations $979 $274 28% $1,253 0.0% $979 $274 $1,253 2037Q3 48.3% $1,452 $406 $1,858 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $9,376 $2,625 28% 12,001 0.0% $9,376 $2,625 $12,001 2037Q3 48.3% $13,903 $3,893 $17,796

1.2% Project Operation: $1,166 $326 28% 1,492 0.0% $1,166 $326 $1,492 2037Q3 48.3% $1,729 $484 $2,213

3.1% Project Management $2,948 $825 28% 3,773 0.0% $2,948 $825 $3,773 2037Q3 48.3% $4,371 $1,224 $5,595 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $133,001 $39,632 172,633 $133,001 $39,632 $172,633 $186,750 $55,562 $242,312

TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)
Effective Price Level:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis) DWSC - EAST Estimate Prepared:

Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 300 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 10 of 11 ends

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
02 RELOCATIONS $28,590 $12,866 45% $41,456 0.0% $28,590 $12,866 $41,456 2032Q2 20.5% $34,441 $15,498 $49,93906 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $12,941 $3,623 28% $16,564 0.0% $12,941 $3,623 $16,564 2032Q2 20.5% $15,589 $4,365 $19,95411 Phase 1S - 35% $33,066 $9,258 28% $42,324 0.0% $33,066 $9,258 $42,324 2030Q4 15.9% $38,333 $10,733 $49,06611 Phase 2S $49,391 $13,829 28% $63,220 0.0% $49,391 $13,829 $63,220 2031Q4 18.9% $58,747 $16,449 $75,19611 Levees & Floodwalls $0 $0 28% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $011 I Street Rail Raod Closure Structure $12,509 $3,503 28% $16,012 0.0% $12,509 $3,503 $16,012 2033Q4 25.2% $15,662 $4,385 $20,04816 Phase C3E / 4E $18,831 $5,273 28% $24,104 0.0% $18,831 $5,273 $24,104 2032Q3 21.2% $22,832 $6,393 $29,22518 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $1,825 $511 28% $2,336 0.0% $1,825 $511 $2,336 2032Q2 20.5% $2,198 $616 $2,814 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $157,153 $48,863 31% $206,016 $157,153 $48,863 $206,016 $187,802 $58,439 $246,242 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $94,327 $42,755 45% $137,082 0.0% $94,327 $42,755 $137,082 2031Q4 18.9% $112,194 $50,854 $163,04730 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN

5.0% Project Management $7,858 $2,200 28% $10,058 0.0% $7,858 $2,200 $10,058 2033Q4 31.6% $10,344 $2,896 $13,240

1.0% Planning & Environmental Compliance $5,540 $1,551 28% $7,091 0.0% $5,540 $1,551 $7,091 2033Q4 31.6% $7,293 $2,042 $9,335

5.0% Engineering & Design $7,858 $2,200 28% $10,058 0.0% $7,858 $2,200 $10,058 2033Q4 31.6% $10,344 $2,896 $13,240

1.0% Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $1,641 $459 28% $2,100 0.0% $1,641 $459 $2,100 2033Q4 31.6% $2,160 $605 $2,765

1.0% Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $1,641 $459 28% $2,100 0.0% $1,641 $459 $2,100 2033Q4 31.6% $2,160 $605 $2,765

1.0% Contracting & Reprographics $1,641 $459 28% $2,100 0.0% $1,641 $459 $2,100 2033Q4 31.6% $2,160 $605 $2,765

5.0% Engineering During Construction $7,858 $2,200 28% $10,058 0.0% $7,858 $2,200 $10,058 2033Q4 31.6% $10,344 $2,896 $13,240

1.6% Planning During Construction $2,514 $704 28% $3,218 0.0% $2,514 $704 $3,218 2033Q4 31.6% $3,309 $927 $4,236

1.6% Real Estate NFS Oversight $1,594 $717 45% $2,311 0.0% $1,594 $717 $2,311 2033Q4 31.6% $2,098 $944 $3,043

1.0% Project Operations $1,641 $459 28% $2,100 0.0% $1,641 $459 $2,100 2033Q4 31.6% $2,160 $605 $2,765 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

10.0% Construction Management $15,715 $4,400 28% $20,115 0.0% $15,715 $4,400 $20,115 2033Q4 31.6% $20,687 $5,792 $26,479

1.2% Project Operation: $1,955 $547 28% $2,502 0.0% $1,955 $547 $2,502 2033Q4 31.6% $2,574 $721 $3,294

3.1% Project Management $4,941 $1,383 28% $6,324 0.0% $4,941 $1,383 $6,324 2033Q4 31.6% $6,504 $1,821 $8,325 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $313,877 $109,360 $423,237 $313,877 $109,360 $423,237 $382,134 $132,648 $514,782

TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED)
Estimate Prepared:

Effective Price Level:

Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST

SAC RIVER NORTH

PROJECT FIRST COST
(Constant Dollar Basis)
Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 301 **** TOTAL PROJECT COST SUMMARY **** Printed:6/27/2025

Page 11 of 11 ends

A BC D E F G H I J P L M N O
02 RELOCATIONS $10,033 $0 0% $10,033 0.0% $10,033 $0 $10,033 2022Q4 0.0% $10,033 $0 $10,03306 FISH & WILDLIFE FACILITIES $8,873 $1,153 13% $10,026 0.0% $8,873 $1,153 $10,026 2022Q4 0.0% $8,873 $1,153 $10,02611 LEVEES & FLOODWALLS $46,491 $6,044 13% $52,535 0.0% $46,491 $6,044 $52,535 2022Q4 0.0% $46,491 $6,044 $52,53518 CULTURAL RESOURCE PRESERVATION $6,926 $900 13% $7,826 0.0% $6,926 $900 $7,826 2022Q4 0.0% $6,926 $900 $7,826 ____________ __________ _____________ ____________ _________________ _________ _____________ ___________ ________________ _________________ CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE TOTALS: $72,323 $8,098 11% $80,421 $72,323 $8,098 $80,421 $72,323 $8,098 $80,421 01 LANDS AND DAMAGES $44,717 $0 0% $44,717 0.0% $44,717 $0 $44,717 2022Q4 0.0% $44,717 $0 $44,71730 PLANNING, ENGINEERING & DESIGN Project Management $31,853 $4,141 13% $35,994 0.0% $31,853 $4,141 $35,994 2022Q4 0.0% $31,853 $4,141 $35,994 Planning & Environmental Compliance $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Engineering & Design $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Reviews, ATRs, IEPRs, VE $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Life Cycle Updates (cost, schedule, risks) $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Contracting & Reprographics $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Engineering During Construction $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Planning During Construction $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Real Estate NFS Oversight $233 $30 13% $263 0.0% $233 $30 $263 2025Q1 0.0% $233 $30 $263 31 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Construction Management $14,004 $1,821 13% $15,825 0.0% $14,004 $1,821 $15,825 2022Q4 0.0% $14,004 $1,821 $15,825 Project Operation: $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 Project Management $0 $0 13% $0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 0 0.0% $0 $0 $0 CONTRACT COST TOTALS: $163,130 $14,089 $177,219 $163,130 $14,089 $177,219 $163,130 $14,089 $177,219 Civil Works Work Breakdown Structure ESTIMATED COST PROJECT FIRST COST (Constant Dollar Basis) TOTAL PROJECT COST (FULLY FUNDED) Estimate Prepared:

Effective Price Level:

SAC RIVER SOUTH - NFS BUILT
Completed - Awaiting Crediting Package
Filename: West_Sacramento_TPCS_FY25 20250429.xlsxTPCS 302 Design Maturity Determination for Cost Certification
Date:

P2 Designation/Project Name: ________________________________________________________ The Chief of Engineering is responsible for the technical content and engineering sufficiency for all engineering products produced by the command. As such, I have performed the Management Control Evaluation per Engineer Regulation (ER) 1110-2-1150, Engineering and Design for Civil Works Projects, Appendix H, Internal Management Control Review Checklist.

The current design Choose an item. require HQ approval (i.e., engineering waivers), requiring a deviation from mandatory requirements and mandatory standards, as defined in ERs, Engineering Manuals, Engineering Technical letters, and Engineering Circulars.

The current hydrology and hydraulics modeling is at ____% design maturity, per reference (h) below.

The current geotechnical data and subsurface investigations are at ____% design maturity, per reference (h) below. Subsurface investigations shall also include investigations of potential borrow and spoil areas.

The current survey data is at ____% design maturity, per reference (h) below.

Other major technical and/or scope assumptions and risks include the following, which will be refined as the design progresses.

The aggregate for all features is ____% design maturity. Therefore, per the CECW-EC memorandum dated 05-June-2023, I certify that the design deliverables used to generate the cost products for this project and the estimate meet the requirements for a Choose an item estimate, as per reference (a) below. Design risks, impacts and remaining efforts are summarized on page 2.

Considering risks and assumptions noted above, along with all other concerns documented in the Risk Register, the Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis has developed a contingency of ____% at the ____% confidence level for the defined project scope.

Chief of Engineering
__BBBB__________________________________________________B Printed Name
BBBB_____________________________________________________ Signature
West Sacramento
44 20
33 The 28% contingency factor was derived from the modeling/inputs of the Cost Schedule Risk Assessment that was run/reviewed by the PDT in 2025 that has an estimated contingency value of $257M.
32 28
80 Mark J. DeRocchi, P.E.

Chief, Engineering Division, SPK
Digitally signed by
DEROCCHI.MARK.JOSEPH.100512
4790
Date: 2025.06.09 23:57:40 -07'00'
6/9/25

DOES NOT
CLASS 3
Chief of Engineering
303
Design Maturity Determination for Cost Certification, Remaining Work If an engineering waiver is required, list the risks and remaining design work needed to mitigate this issue in the current design. Identify remaining effort to complete the design required for 100% design.

Identify remaining effort to complete geotechnical design effort required for 100% design. List the risks and cost and schedule impacts needed to mitigate this issue in the current design.

Identify remaining effort required to complete H&H required for 100% design. List the risks and cost and schedule impacts needed to mitigate this issue in the current design.

Identify remaining effort needed to complete survey data required for 100% design. List the risks and cost and schedule impacts needed to mitigate this issue in the current design.

If the project is anticipated to be executed in parts, provide a design assessment (percent complete) of each part/phase below.

References:
a. ER 1110-2-1302 – Civil Works Cost Engineering
b. CECW-EC memorandum dated 05-June-2023MFR, Guidance on Cost Engineering Products update for Civil Works Projects in accordance with Engineer Regulation 1110-2-1302 – Civil Works Cost Engineering c. ER 1165-2-217 – Civil Works Review Policy
d. ER 1110-2-1150 – Engineering and Design for Civil Works Projects e. ER 1110-3-12 – Quality Management
f. ER 1110-345-700 – Design Analysis, Drawings and Specifications g. EM 5-1-11 – Project Delivery Business Process (PDBP) h. Engineering and Construction Bulletin (ECB) 2023-9 – Civil Works Design Milestone Checklists Engineering waiver is not required
Geotech – Design Status - 20% design completion overall with an estimated design completion for all phases by 2038
Reference attachment that explains the design percentages per phase for further clarification H&H – Design Status - 44% design completion overall with an estimated design completion for all phases by 2038
Reference attachment that explains the design percentages per phase for further clarification Survey – Design Status - 33% design completion overall with an estimated design completion for all phases by 2038 Reference attachment that explains the design percentages per phase for further clarification Reference attachment that explains the design percentages per phase for further clarification During this evaluation of the DMM the team decided that assigning equal weight to each phase was the best. However, the PDT did discuss that equal weight distriubtion can be misleading and inaccurate because each phase has varying levels of project lenghts and complexities.
304
Design Maturity Determination for Cost Certification – Instructions Paragraph 1 – Design Date: Use the drop-down menu to populate the date of the design.

Paragraph 1 – Project Information: Enter the P2 Project number and Project name.

Paragraph 3 – Engineering Waivers: Use the drop-down menu to populate this field with either “Does,” or “Does not.” If an engineering waiver is needed, or anticipated to be needed, provide the specific waiver required for the Project. A waiver is any deviation from current mandatory standards, as indicated.

Paragraph 4 – Hydrology and Hydraulics: Populate this field with the % design maturity.

Paragraph 5 – Geotechnical Information: Populate this field with the % design maturity.

Paragraph 6 – Survey Data: Populate this field with the % design maturity.

Paragraph 7 – Other Technical Assumptions and/or Scope: Enter any other major technical assumptions or scope assumptions here. Only include assumptions that pertain to design. Template discussion fields are provided as a courtesy. Please include additional pages as necessary.

Paragraph 8 – Signature: Print the name and title and provide the signature for the District’s Chief of Engineering. This authority cannot be delegated; however, the Deputy Chief of Engineering and Design may sign the form in the absence of the Chief of Engineering. All fillable fields must be populated (use N/A if not applicable) in order for the document to be signed.

Page 2 ends

design effort and risks to complete 100% design for the authorized project. If the project is to be broken into parts or phases, provide details on the aggregate design level of each phase and anticipated timeline for completion.
7KLVIRUPLVUHTXLUHGIRUDOO&LYLO:RUNVSURMHFWVIRULQLWLDO&RVW&HUWLILFDWLRQDQG5HFHUWLILFDWLRQEDVHGRQ3ROLF\ &ODULILFDWLRQ0)5GDWHG-XQH*XLGDQFH RQ &RVW (QJLQHHULQJ 3URGXFWV XSGDWH IRU &LYLO :RUNV 3URMHFWV LQ DFFRUGDQFH ZLWK (QJLQHHU 5HJXODWLRQ ± &LYLO :RUNV &RVW (QJLQHHULQJ 7KH3RLQWRI&RQWDFWIRUWKLVDFWLRQLV0U0XNHVK.XPDU&RVW(QJLQHHULQJ&RPPXQLW\RI3UDFWLFH/HDGHU&(&: (&0XNHVK.XPDU#XVDFHDUP\PLO
9HUVLRQ
2FWREHU
305
West Sacramento - DMM Reference 5/12/2025
Overall Design Phase % Current Design %
Estimated Design
Completion Construction Start
Construction
Completion
Training Dike 0% 12/31/2031 6/15/2034 11/2/2034
Yolo Bypass 80%
Yolo Bypass North/South/Emegency Repairs 100%
Yolo Bypass South - Stabilization 60%
Stone Lock Closure Levee 0% 7/30/2029 9/9/2031 2/21/2033 DWSC - West 0% 4/6/2033 6/6/2035 1/10/2037
South Cross Levee 0% 6/30/2033 12/12/2035 9/3/2037
Port South 0% 6/6/2034 11/7/2036 4/21/2038
DWSC - East 0% 6/8/2034 6/8/2036 1/21/2038
Sac River North 25%
Contract 1S 65% 8/6/2027 11/28/2029 7/29/2031 Contract 2S 35% 7/18/2028 11/29/2030 5/13/2032 UPRR Window 0% 8/28/2029 10/22/2032 4/5/2034 Contract C3E / 4E Bank Stabilization 0% 6/13/2029 7/17/2031 6/21/2033 Sac River South - NFS Built (Early Implementation
Project)
100%
23% 3/30/2031 4/21/2038
H&H 44%
Geotech 20%
Survey 33%
Average 32% 20250609: During this evaluation of the DMM the team decided that assigning equal weight to each phase was the best. However, the PDT did discuss that equal weight distriubtion can be misleading and inaccurate because each phase has varying levels of project lenghts and complexities. 306
West Sacramento - DMM Reference 5/12/2025
H&H Back-Up Information H&H Rationale
Training Dike 35% The GRR was done in the 3x3x3 era and based on the GRR the design components were more realistically in the 3-5% range since most of the discussion and alternatives were vaguely discussed, along with just typical cross sections. Also, due to the time from the GRR to today, the actual conditions on the ground have changed which would warranty additional model runs, verifications and surveys.

Hydrology needs to completed a detailed 2D hydrualic model, erosion, and scour assessment, rock design, P&S, DDR and design review.

Yolo Bypass 90%
Yolo Bypass North/South/Emegency R 100% Modeling is completed for Yolo Bypass North and South, but the compling of this data for other phases is not complete Complete: Hydrology and DWSE profiles for initial PED priority.

Incomplete: Compile profile data into programmatic DWSP report.

Yolo Bypass South - Stabilization 80% Memo was completed and all modeling was completed for the permanent repairs. However, the documentation and review of the design package is not completed and that will be done throughout the design process.

Complete: Hydrology and DWSE profiles for initial PED priority.

Incomplete: Compile profile data into programmatic DWSP report.

Stone Lock Closure Levee 10% The GRR was done in the 3x3x3 era and based on the GRR the design components were more realistically in the 3-5% range since most of the discussion and alternatives were vaguely discussed, along with just typical cross sections. Also, due to the time from the GRR to today, the actual conditions on the ground have changed which would warranty additional model runs, verifications and surveys.

A lot of the hydrology has been derived, but the modeling and analysis has not started.

Complete: Hydrology, DWSP profiles for PED
Incomplete: Finalize programmatic DWSP report, support to A-E for DBB contract, design reviews, O&M manual.

DWSC - West 10% The GRR was done in the 3x3x3 era and based on the GRR the design components were more realistically in the 3-5% range since most of the discussion and alternatives were vaguely discussed, along with just typical cross sections. Also, due to the time from the GRR to today, the actual conditions on the ground have changed which would warranty additional model runs, verifications and surveys.

A lot of the hydrology has been derived, but the modeling and analysis has not started.

Complete: Hydrology, initial hydraulic modeling
Incomplete: Detailed hydraulic modeling, engineering project performance, DWSE, P&S, DDR, design reviews.

South Cross Levee 10% The GRR was done in the 3x3x3 era and based on the GRR the design components were more realistically in the 3-5% range since most of the discussion and alternatives were vaguely discussed, along with just typical cross sections. Also, due to the time from the GRR to today, the actual conditions on the ground have changed which would warranty additional model runs, verifications and surveys.

A lot of the hydrology has been derived, but the modeling and analysis has not started.

Complete: Hydrology, initial hydraulic modeling
Incomplete: Detailed hydraulic modeling, engineering project performance, DWSE, P&S, DDR, design reviews.

Port South 45% The GRR was done in the 3x3x3 era and based on the GRR the design components were more realistically in the 3-5% range since most of the discussion and alternatives were vaguely discussed, along with just typical cross sections. Also, due to the time from the GRR to today, the actual conditions on the ground have changed which would warranty additional model runs, verifications and surveys.

Hydrology is already determined and each segement to some degree has been modeled, this is just modeling, there is no documentation or analysis that has been performed yet.

Complete: Hydrology, initial hydraulic modeling
Incomplete: Detailed hydraulic modeling, engineering project performance, DWSE, P&S, DDR, design reviews.

DWSC - East 45% The GRR was done in the 3x3x3 era and based on the GRR the design components were more realistically in the 3-5% range since most of the discussion and alternatives were vaguely discussed, along with just typical cross sections. Also, due to the time from the GRR to today, the actual conditions on the ground have changed which would warranty additional model runs, verifications and surveys.

Hydrology is already determined and each segement to some degree has been modeled, this is just modeling, there is no documentation or analysis that has been performed yet.

Complete: Hydrology, initial hydraulic modeling
Incomplete: Detailed hydraulic modeling, engineering project performance, DWSE, P&S, DDR, design reviews.

Sac River North 51%
Contract 1S 70% Design is at 60%, but H&H portion is currently at 70% Complete: Hydrology, DWSP, engineering project performance, specifications, DDR Incomplete: finalized programmatic DWSP Report, design review Contract 2S 70% Design is working towards a 30%, but H&H portion is currently at 70% Complete: Hydrology, DWSP, engineering project performance, specifications, DDR Incomplete: finalized programmatic DWSP Report, design review UPRR Window 40% The type of closure structure and unknown design is still needed because at this point we only have the WSE and not the O&M on when the closure structure would need to be closed and the impacts to not closing in time Complete: Hydrology, DWSP profiles for PED
Incomplete: Finalize programmatic DWSP report, support to A-E for DBB contract, design reviews, O&M manual.

Contract C3E / 4E Bank Stabilization 25% The overall design from H&H is 10% LOE because we have at least up to 2 years of modeling to get to a 30% design. We have been able to complete a site selection, but the modeling and requirements for design recommendations is still in the works.

The geotechnical data is being handed off to MVD and that input is needed prior from MVD for SPK to proceed Sac River South - NFS Built (Early
Implementation Project)
100% NFS completed design/construction
44% Overall 44%; however, Since it combined, its difficult to assess the percentage ( and also new to the project), but talking to the team 10% completion to Stone Lock Closure, DWSC-West, and the South Cross Levee seems a little low to me. But I will differ to Morgan and Derek if any adjustment is needed. My rationale is based on the completed hydrology concepts and adopting the available regional hydrology.

Most of the hydraulics is developed from a levee system approach, therefore the hydrology and most hydraulic modeling is completed. Items that remain are specific to levee segments (compiling hydraulic data, assessing resutts) and specific design contracts (formulating designs, documentation, P&S, design reviews).
20250609: During this evaluation of the DMM the team decided that assigning equal weight to each phase was the best. However, the PDT did discuss that equal weight distriubtion can be misleading and inaccurate because each phase has varying levels of project lenghts and complexities.

PDT: Jimmy Pan, Derek Pate, Morgan Marlatt, Raziul Mollah Branch Chief: Greg Kukas
307
West Sacramento - DMM Reference 5/12/2025
Geotech Back-Up Information
Geotech – Design
Status Geotechnical justification (assumes feasbility study provides a 10% of the total design maturity) Training Dike 0% There is no drilling or data that we have for this reach yet.

Yolo Bypass 55%
Yolo Bypass North/South/Emegency Repairs 99% Need to still perform a close out assessment of the system and write the report. Design and construction are completed.

Yolo Bypass South - Stabilization 10% This is in construciton, but due to the failures on site there is new design effort that needs to be completed Emergency memo was issued and emergency repairs were completed, but the final fixes and design are still underway Stone Lock Closure Levee 5% Working towards a 15% design and just completed drilling in 2025 DWSC - West 0% The GRR provided only judgements and assumptions for the conceptual/typical designs that may be required and there was no data to support those assumptions/designs. This was the decisions since the GRR was utilizing the old 3x3x3 report concept.

South Cross Levee 0% The GRR provided only judgements and assumptions for the conceptual/typical designs that may be required and there was no data to support those assumptions/designs. This was the decisions since the GRR was utilizing the old 3x3x3 report concept.

Port South 0% The GRR provided only judgements and assumptions for the conceptual/typical designs that may be required and there was no data to support those assumptions/designs. This was the decisions since the GRR was utilizing the old 3x3x3 report concept.

DWSC - East 0% The GRR provided only judgements and assumptions for the conceptual/typical designs that may be required and there was no data to support those assumptions/designs. This was the decisions since the GRR was utilizing the old 3x3x3 report concept.

Sac River North 26%
Contract 1S 80% Design is currently at 60%, but Geotech specific work is more at 80% Contract 2S 15% Need to redo the GBOD and re-issue a SOW.

UPRR Window 5% This is going to be provided to an AE and they will do the design Contract C3E / 4E Bank Stabilization 2% We have some data that has been sent off to ERDC for evaluation and have preliminary level of data for site screening Sac River South - NFS Built - South Port 99% Need to still perform a close out assessment of the system and write the report. Design and construction are completed 20% Overall %
20250609: During this evaluation of the DMM the team decided that assigning equal weight to each phase was the best. However, the PDT did discuss that equal weight distriubtion can be misleading and inaccurate because each phase has varying levels of project lenghts and 308
West Sacramento - DMM Reference 5/20/2025
Survey Back-Up Information
Survey – Design
Status - Overall Notes
Training Dike 5% Have done some mapping that was completed for the GRR (conceputal level) GRR was a planning level and it is mostly not at a quality level for the requirements for design Per Engineering Guidance surveys have to be redone/evaluated every or 4-5 years.

Yolo Bypass 90%
Yolo Bypass North/South/Emergency Repair 100% In Construction Yolo Bypass South - Stabilization 80% There might be a need for additional data required here for drainage that were not apart of the original project Stone Lock Closure Levee 5% Have done some mapping that was completed for the GRR (conceputal level) GRR was a planning level and it is mostly not at a quality level for the requirements for design Per Engineering Guidance surveys have to be redone/evaluated every or 4-5 years.

DWSC - West 5% Have done some mapping that was completed for the GRR (conceputal level) GRR was a planning level and it is mostly not at a quality level for the requirements for design Per Engineering Guidance surveys have to be redone/evaluated every or 4-5 years.

The DWSC are average completion rates and if we were weighting them by reach/length the overall % would be much smaller South Cross Levee 5% Have done some mapping that was completed for the GRR (conceputal level) GRR was a planning level and it is mostly not at a quality level for the requirements for design Per Engineering Guidance surveys have to be redone/evaluated every or 4-5 years.

Port South 5% Have done some mapping that was completed for the GRR (conceputal level) GRR was a planning level and it is mostly not at a quality level for the requirements for design Per Engineering Guidance surveys have to be redone/evaluated every or 4-5 years.

DWSC - East 5% Have done some mapping that was completed for the GRR (conceputal level) GRR was a planning level and it is mostly not at a quality level for the requirements for design Per Engineering Guidance surveys have to be redone/evaluated every or 4-5 years.

The DWSC are average completion rates and if we were weighting them by reach/length the overall % would be much smaller Sac River North 81%
Contract 1S 95% The majority of the data is completed and there is potential for additional changes if H&H has any changes during the 65% design update through 100%
Identified data gaps and there is potential for additional survey as the design progresses Contract 2S 90% The majority of the data is completed, but since the design is still in the 30% development stage there are still potential for additional surveys to be needed based on any changes that come up during the process for H&H or other sections.

Identified data gaps and there is potential for additional survey as the design progresses UPRR Window 50% Survey to determine if this was mapped during the Phase 1S and Phase 2S efforts or if it is truly at a 5% level.

Was provided to part of Phase 1S and 2S
There might be a need for additional topo, but this requirement was put on the AE to determine and provide Contract C3E / 4E Bank Stabilization 90% Need to verify if we didn't do all 4 of these phases at the same time Was provided to part of Phase 1S and 2S
There might be a need for additional topo, but this requirement was put on the AE to determine and provide Sac River South - NFS Built 95%
There is potential that there might be additioanl surveys or reviews to ensure this is compelted and acceptable to USACE criteria 33% Survey is at 33% overall; however, there might need to be additional data that will be required or re-done depending on the time that passes from the current surveys we have to when the designs would pick back up There is a potential that the design % will change by the next certification if the designs are shelved or put on hold The DWSC are average completion rates and if we were weighting them by reach/length the overall % would be much smaller The individual reaches are various lengths and complexities, which will impact the overall % as they progress forward 20250609: During this evaluation of the DMM the team decided that assigning equal weight to each phase was the best.

However, the PDT did discuss that equal weight distriubtion can be misleading and inaccurate because each phase has varying levels of project lenghts and complexities.

PDT: James Oliver, Joe Marino
Branch Chief: Sam Hong
309
West Sacramento – FY25 CSRA Outputs
310
311
312
313
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
Cost Estimate 2403 27-Jun-25 A 14-Mar-35
No Category (CNTG) 2403 27-Jun-25 A 14-Mar-35
0111 A00020390 Await Start of Next TPCS Development 314 27-Jun-25 A 30-Oct-26 012 A00020400 Develop TPCS 15 02-Nov-26 23-Nov-26
013 A00020410 Package CCE for DQC 7 24-Nov-26 03-Dec-26 014 A00020420 CCE DQC Review 10 04-Dec-26 17-Dec-26
015 A00020430 CCE Package for ATR 5 18-Dec-26 24-Dec-26 016 A00020440 2027 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001) 0 24-Dec-26 017 A00020450 ATR Review 25 28-Dec-26 02-Feb-27
018 A00020460 ATR Certification 3 03-Feb-27 05-Feb-27
019 A00020470 Final Review and Certification 22 08-Feb-27 10-Mar-27 020 A00020480 2027 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020) 0 10-Mar-27 021 A00020500 Develop TPCS 15 06-Nov-28 28-Nov-28
022 A00020510 Package CCE for DQC 7 29-Nov-28 07-Dec-28 023 A00020520 CCE DQC Review 10 08-Dec-28 21-Dec-28
024 A00020530 CCE Package for ATR 5 22-Dec-28 29-Dec-28 025 A00020540 2029 Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001) 0 29-Dec-28 026 A00020550 ATR Review 25 02-Jan-29 06-Feb-29
027 A00020560 ATR Certification 3 07-Feb-29 09-Feb-29
028 A00020570 Final Review and Certification 22 12-Feb-29 14-Mar-29 029 A00020580 2029 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020) 0 14-Mar-29 030 A00020600 Develop TPCS 15 04-Nov-30 25-Nov-30
031 A00020610 Package CCE for DQC 7 26-Nov-30 05-Dec-30 032 A00020620 CCE DQC Review 10 06-Dec-30 19-Dec-30
033 A00020630 CCE Package for ATR 5 20-Dec-30 27-Dec-30 034 A00020640 2031 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001) 0 27-Dec-30 035 A00020650 ATR Review 25 30-Dec-30 04-Feb-31
036 A00020660 ATR Certification 3 05-Feb-31 07-Feb-31
037 A00020670 Final Review and Certification 22 10-Feb-31 12-Mar-31 038 A00020680 2031 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020) 0 12-Mar-31 039 A00020700 Develop TPCS 15 01-Nov-32 22-Nov-32
040 A00020710 Package CCE for DQC 7 23-Nov-32 02-Dec-32 041 A00020720 CCE DQC Review 10 03-Dec-32 16-Dec-32
042 A00020730 CCE Package for ATR 5 17-Dec-32 23-Dec-32 043 A00020740 2033 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001) 0 23-Dec-32 044 A00020750 ATR Review 25 27-Dec-32 01-Feb-33
045 A00020760 ATR Certification 3 02-Feb-33 04-Feb-33
046 A00020770 Final Review and Certification 22 07-Feb-33 09-Mar-33 047 A00020780 2033 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020) 0 09-Mar-33 048 A00020800 Develop TPCS 15 06-Nov-34 28-Nov-34
049 A00020810 Package CCE for DQC 7 29-Nov-34 07-Dec-34 050 A00020820 CCE DQC Review 10 08-Dec-34 21-Dec-34
051 A00020830 CCE Package for ATR 5 22-Dec-34 29-Dec-34 052 A00020840 2035 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001) 0 29-Dec-34 053 A00020850 ATR Review 25 02-Jan-35 06-Feb-35
054 A00020860 ATR Certification 3 07-Feb-35 09-Feb-35
055 A00020870 Final Review and Certification 22 12-Feb-35 14-Mar-35 056 A00020880 2035 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020) 0 14-Mar-35 In Kind Credit 257 18-Jun-24 A 10-Aug-26
No Category (CNTG) 257 18-Jun-24 A 10-Aug-26
004 A00010130 SPK-PD Develops Programmatic Integral Determination Report (IDR) 147 18-Jun-24 A 04-Mar-26 005 A00010140 SPK DQC Programmatic Integral Determination Report 20 05-Mar-26 01-Apr-26 006 A00010150 SPK submittal of Programmatic Integral Determination Report to SPD 0 01-Apr-26 007 A00010160 SPK coordination and backcheck of IDR with SPD 30 02-Apr-26 13-May-26 008 A00010170 SPD approves IDR and determines associated NFS WIK/IKC Credit 20 14-May-26 11-Jun-26 009 A00010180 SPK communicates SPD decision regarding NFS WIK/IKC Credit 20 12-Jun-26 13-Jul-26 010 A00010190 SPK applies and actualizes the NFS WIK/IKC to the Projects CSCR's 20 14-Jul-26 10-Aug-26 011 A00010200 Credit Transfer Complete 0 10-Aug-26
Yolo Bypass East Levee - North 355 17-Aug-23 A 04-Jan-27 Construction Contracts 355 17-Aug-23 A 04-Jan-27
0091 CON02202 YBEL N Construction Contract 95 17-Aug-23 A 02-Nov-25 015 CON02252 YBEL N Construction 32 01-May-24 A 15-Sep-25 0151 CON02254 YBEL N Construction Complete Contingency (CONT100) 0 16-Sep-25 16-Sep-25 016 CON02265 YBEL N Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 16-Sep-25 018 CON02500 YBEL N Construction Complete (CC820) 0 16-Sep-25 020 CON02532 Process Final Payment 48 16-Sep-25 02-Nov-25 021 CON02535 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 16-Sep-25 01-Nov-25 022 CON02534 YBEL N Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 02-Nov-25 023 CON02540 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 22 03-Nov-25 24-Nov-25 024 CON02550 YBEL N As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 24-Nov-25 025 CON02580 YBEL N O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 01-Nov-25 026 CON02590 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 02-Nov-25 04-Nov-25 027 CON02600 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 05-Nov-25 09-Nov-25 028 CON02605 YBEL N Notice of Project Completion Contingency (Cont) 0 04-Jan-27 04-Jan-27 029 CON02610 YBEL N Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 04-Jan-27 Yolo Bypass East Levee - South 200 21-Apr-23 A 15-Feb-26 Construction Contracts 200 21-Apr-23 A 15-Feb-26
0101 CON01202 YBEL S Construction Contract - W9123823C0012 35 21-Apr-23 A 03-Sep-25 021 CON01513 Process Final Payment 35 02-Aug-24 A 03-Sep-25 022 CON01514 Develop OMRR&R Manual 70 02-Aug-24 A 08-Oct-25 023 CON01530 YBEL S Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 15-Feb-26* 024 CON01540 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 04-Sep-25 19-Sep-25 025 CON01550 YBEL S As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 19-Sep-25 026 CON01580 YBEL S O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 08-Oct-25 027 CON01590 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 08-Dec-25 10-Dec-25 Yolo Bypass East Levee - South Bank Stabilization 1131 06-Jun-25 A 10-Feb-30 PED 1051 06-Jun-25 A 12-Oct-29
066 A3212380 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 43 06-Jun-25 A 30-Sep-25 067 A3212390 YBEL-S BS Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 30-Sep-25 068 A3212400 60% Design Final analysis and revisions 44 01-Oct-25 04-Dec-25 069 A3212410 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 41 05-Dec-25 04-Feb-26 070 A3212420 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 05-Feb-26 02-Apr-26 072 A3212440 YBEL-S BS 60% Design Complete (SPK-265) 0 04-Feb-26 073 A3212450 Risk Cadre Report 44 06-Jun-25 A 01-Oct-25 074 A3212460 YBEL-S BS Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 01-Oct-25 075 A3212470 YBEL-S BS Initiate 90% Design 0 05-Feb-26
076 A3212480 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 05-Feb-26 17-Jun-26 077 A3212490 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 18-Jun-26 17-Jul-26 078 A3212500 YBEL-S BS Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 17-Jun-26 079 A3212510 90% Tech Reviews 59 18-Jun-26 11-Sep-26
081 A3212530 YBEL-S BS 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 11-Sep-26 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 14-Mar-35, Cost Estimate
14-Mar-35, No Category (CNTG)
Await Start of Next TPCS Development
Develop TPCS
Package CCE for DQC
CCE DQC Review
CCE Package for ATR
2027 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001)
ATR Review
ATR Certification
Final Review and Certification
2027 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020)
Develop TPCS
Package CCE for DQC
CCE DQC Review
CCE Package for ATR
2029 Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001)
ATR Review
ATR Certification
Final Review and Certification
2029 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020)
Develop TPCS
Package CCE for DQC
CCE DQC Review
CCE Package for ATR
2031 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001)
ATR Review
ATR Certification
Final Review and Certification
2031 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020)
Develop TPCS
Package CCE for DQC
CCE DQC Review
CCE Package for ATR
2033 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001)
ATR Review
ATR Certification
Final Review and Certification
2033 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020)
Develop TPCS
Package CCE for DQC
CCE DQC Review
CCE Package for ATR
2035 TPCS Submit to ATR (SPD-CW-001)
ATR Review
ATR Certification
Final Review and Certification
2035 TPCS Cert Complete (SPK-CW-020)
10-Aug-26, In Kind Credit
10-Aug-26, No Category (CNTG)
SPK-PD Develops Programmatic Integral Determination Report (IDR) SPK DQC Programmatic Integral Determination Report
SPK submittal of Programmatic Integral Determination Report to SPD SPK coordination and backcheck of IDR with SPD
SPD approves IDR and determines associated NFS WIK/IKC Credit SPK communicates SPD decision regarding NFS WIK/IKC Credit SPK applies and actualizes the NFS WIK/IKC to the Projects CSCR's Credit Transfer Complete
04-Jan-27, Yolo Bypass East Levee - North
04-Jan-27, Construction Contracts
YBEL N Construction Contract
YBEL N Construction
YBEL N Construction Complete Contingency (CONT100)
YBEL N Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
YBEL N Construction Complete (CC820)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
YBEL N Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
YBEL N As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
YBEL N O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
YBEL N Notice of Project Completion Contingency (Cont)
YBEL N Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 15-Feb-26, Yolo Bypass East Levee - South
15-Feb-26, Construction Contracts
YBEL S Construction Contract - W9123823C0012
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
YBEL S Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
YBEL S As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
YBEL S O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
10-Feb-30, Yolo Bypass East Levee - South Bank Stabilization 12-Oct-29, PED
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
YBEL-S BS Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Design Final analysis and revisions
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
YBEL-S BS 60% Design Complete (SPK-265)
Risk Cadre Report
YBEL-S BS Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
YBEL-S BS Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
YBEL-S BS Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% Tech Reviews
YBEL-S BS 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 1 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 314
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
082 A3212540 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 14-Sep-26 09-Nov-26 083 A3212550 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 10-Nov-26 08-Jan-27 084 A3212560 Final BCOES Review 20 11-Jan-27 08-Feb-27
087 A3212570 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 09-Feb-27 16-Jun-27 088 A3212580 YBEL-S BS Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 16-Jun-27 089 A3212590 Final Design P&S Review 31 17-Jun-27 02-Aug-27 090 A3212600 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 03-Aug-27 03-Aug-27 091 A3212610 YBEL-S BS Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 03-Aug-27 092 A3212620 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 03-Aug-27 14-Sep-27 093 A3212630 Update Environmental Docs 117 06-Jun-25 A 20-Jan-26 094 A3212640 USACE OC Review 30 21-Jan-26 04-Mar-26
095 A3212650 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 157 05-Mar-26 16-Oct-26 096 A3212660 YBEL-S BS Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 16-Oct-26 097 A3212670 NFS Briefing 1 19-Oct-26 19-Oct-26
098 A3212680 YBEL-S BS NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 19-Oct-26 099 A3212690 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 20-Oct-26 16-Dec-26 100 A3212700 YBEL-S BS USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 16-Dec-26
101 A3212710 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 17-Dec-26 25-Jan-27 1011 A3212720 YBEL-S BS Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 26-Jan-27 26-Jan-27 102 A3212730 YBEL-S BS SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 26-Jan-27 1021 A3212740 YBEL-S BS NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 26-Jan-27 26-Jan-27 103 A3212750 YBEL-S BS NFS RE Acquisition Start (CW340) 0 26-Jan-27 104 A3212760 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 42 26-Jan-27 25-Mar-27 105 A3212770 YBEL-S BS NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 26-Jan-27 106 A3212780 NFS Utilities Relocation 42 26-Jan-27 25-Mar-27 107 A3212790 YBEL-S BS NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 26-Mar-27 11-Jun-27 1071 A3212800 YBEL-S BS NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 11-Jun-27 1072 A3212808 YBEL-S BS Completes Utilities Relocation Conytingency (CONT) 0 26-Mar-27 26-Mar-27 108 A3212810 YBEL-S BS NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 26-Mar-27 109 A3212820 SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg 55 26-Mar-27 11-Jun-27 110 A3212830 YBEL-S BS USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 14-Jun-27 14-Jun-27 111 A3212840 YBEL-S BS USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 14-Jun-27 1111 A3212850 YBEL-S BS BCOES Certification 15 14-Jun-27 06-Jul-27 1112 A3212860 YBEL-S BS BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 07-Jul-27 07-Jul-27 1113 A3212870 YBEL-S BS BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 07-Jul-27 112 A3212880 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 14-Jun-27 21-Jan-28 113 A3212890 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 24-Jan-28 06-Dec-28 114 A3212900 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 07-Dec-28 28-Dec-28 115 A3212910 YBEL-S BS SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 28-Dec-28 116 A3212920 SPD-RE Review 198 29-Dec-28 12-Oct-29
117 A3212930 YBEL-S BS LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 12-Oct-29 Construction Contracts 600 15-Sep-27 10-Feb-30
001 CON5240370 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 15-Sep-27 30-Sep-27 002 CON5240380 RTA Package OC Review 30 01-Oct-27 15-Nov-27 003 CON5240390 Contract Package Contingency 0 16-Nov-27 16-Nov-27 004 CON5240400 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 16-Nov-27 27-Dec-27 005 CON5240410 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 28-Dec-27 28-Dec-27 006 CON5240420 YBEL-S BS Contract RTA (CW400) 0 28-Dec-27 007 CON5240430 YBEL-S BS Advertise (CW420) 0 28-Dec-27
008 CON5240440 Contract Advertisement Period 29 28-Dec-27 08-Feb-28 009 CON5240450 YBEL-S BS Bid Opening (CW430) 0 08-Feb-28 010 CON5240460 Prepare Contract Documents 21 09-Feb-28 09-Mar-28 011 CON5240470 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 10-Mar-28 10-Mar-28 012 CON5240480 YBEL-S BS Contract Award (CC800) 0 10-Mar-28 0121 CON5240482 Contract 454 10-Mar-28 02-Jan-30
013 CON5240490 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 10-Mar-28 07-Jun-28 014 CON5240500 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 08-Jun-28 12-Jun-28 015 CON5240510 YBEL-S BS Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 12-Jun-28 016 CON5240520 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 13-Jun-28 18-Jun-28 017 CON5240530 YBEL-S BS Construction Start (CC815) 0 19-Jun-28 018 CON5240540 YBEL-S BS Construction Contract 547 19-Jun-28 17-Dec-29 019 CON5240550 YBEL-S BS Construction Complete (CC820) 0 17-Dec-29 020 CON5240560 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 18-Dec-29 18-Dec-29 021 CON5240554 YBEL-S BS Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 17-Dec-29 022 CON5240580 Process Final Payment 16 18-Dec-29 02-Jan-30 023 CON5240590 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 18-Dec-29 02-Feb-30 024 CON5240552 YBEL-S BS Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 17-Dec-29 025 CON5240610 YBEL-S BS Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 02-Jan-30 026 CON5240620 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 03-Jan-30 18-Jan-30 027 CON5240630 YBEL-S BS As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 18-Jan-30 028 CON5240640 YBEL-S BS O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 02-Feb-30 029 CON5240650 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 03-Feb-30 05-Feb-30 030 CON5240660 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 06-Feb-30 10-Feb-30 031 CON5240670 YBEL-S BS Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 10-Feb-30 Sac River North Levee Contract 1S 1344 19-Dec-24 A 16-Dec-30 RE Labor & LERRDs Credits 609 04-May-28 09-Oct-30
050 A0311120 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 176 04-May-28 18-Jan-29 051 A0311130 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 19-Jan-29 04-Dec-29 052 A0311140 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 05-Dec-29 26-Dec-29 053 A0311150 SRNL C1S SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 26-Dec-29 054 A0311160 SPD-RE Review 198 27-Dec-29 09-Oct-30
055 A0311170 SRNL C1S LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 09-Oct-30 PED 730 19-Dec-24 A 03-Jul-28
069 A0305040 60% Final analysis and revisions 47 12-Jun-25 A 06-Oct-25 070 A0305045 Prepare Final GDR and GBODR 65 12-Jun-25 A 31-Oct-25 071 A0305050 SRNL C1S Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225) 0 31-Oct-25 072 A0305060 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 07-Oct-25 12-Nov-25 073 A0305080 Contingency - 60% Design 0 13-Nov-25 13-Nov-25 074 A0305090 SRNL C1S 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 13-Nov-25 075 A0307010 SRNL C1S Initiate 90% Design 0 13-Nov-25
076 A0307020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 13-Nov-25 30-Mar-26 077 A0307030 90% Design Review 59 31-Mar-26 23-Jun-26
078 A0307040 Contingency - 90% Design 0 24-Jun-26 24-Jun-26 079 A0307050 SRNL C1S 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 24-Jun-26 080 A0308010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 24-Jun-26 19-Aug-26 081 A0308020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 20-Aug-26 16-Oct-26 082 A0308030 Final Tech Reviews 20 19-Oct-26 16-Nov-26
085 A0308060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 17-Nov-26 29-Mar-27 086 A0308070 SRNL C1S Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 29-Mar-27 087 A0309010 Final Design P&S Review 31 30-Mar-27 11-May-27 088 A0309020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 12-May-27 12-May-27 089 A0309030 SRNL C1S Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 12-May-27 090 A0309040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 12-May-27 24-Jun-27 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final BCOES Review
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
YBEL-S BS Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
YBEL-S BS Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
YBEL-S BS Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
YBEL-S BS NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
YBEL-S BS USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
YBEL-S BS Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
YBEL-S BS SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
YBEL-S BS NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
YBEL-S BS NFS RE Acquisition Start (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
YBEL-S BS NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
YBEL-S BS NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
YBEL-S BS NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
YBEL-S BS Completes Utilities Relocation Conytingency (CONT) YBEL-S BS NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg
YBEL-S BS USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
YBEL-S BS USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) YBEL-S BS BCOES Certification
YBEL-S BS BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
YBEL-S BS BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
YBEL-S BS SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
YBEL-S BS LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
10-Feb-30, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
YBEL-S BS Contract RTA (CW400)
YBEL-S BS Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
YBEL-S BS Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
YBEL-S BS Contract Award (CC800)
Contract
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval YBEL-S BS Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
YBEL-S BS Construction Start (CC815)
YBEL-S BS Construction Contract
YBEL-S BS Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
YBEL-S BS Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
YBEL-S BS Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
YBEL-S BS Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
YBEL-S BS As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
YBEL-S BS O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
YBEL-S BS Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 16-Dec-30, Sac River North Levee Contract 1S
09-Oct-30, RE Labor & LERRDs Credits
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
SRNL C1S SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
SRNL C1S LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
03-Jul-28, PED
60% Final analysis and revisions
Prepare Final GDR and GBODR
SRNL C1S Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
Contingency - 60% Design
SRNL C1S 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
SRNL C1S Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
90% Design Review
Contingency - 90% Design
SRNL C1S 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
SRNL C1S Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
SRNL C1S Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 2 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 315
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
091 A0310010 Update Environmental Docs 1 19-Dec-24 A 31-Jul-25 092 A0310020 USACE OC Review 30 01-Aug-25 12-Sep-25
093 A0310030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 158 15-Sep-25 01-May-26 094 A0310040 SRNL C1S Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 01-May-26 095 A0310050 NFS Briefing 1 04-May-26 04-May-26
096 A0310060 SRNL C1S NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 04-May-26 097 A0310070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 05-May-26 01-Jul-26 098 A0310080 SRNL C1S USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 01-Jul-26
099 A0311010 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 40 24-Jun-26 19-Aug-26 0991 A0311015 SRNL C1S Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 20-Aug-26 20-Aug-26 100 A0311020 SRNL C1S SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 20-Aug-26 1001 A0311025 SRNL C1S NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 20-Aug-26 20-Aug-26 101 A0311030 SRNL C1S NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 20-Aug-26 102 A0311040 SRNL C1S NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 20-Aug-26 22-Mar-28 103 A0311050 SRNL C1S NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 20-Aug-26 104 A0311060 SRNL C1S NFS Utilities Relocation 396 20-Aug-26 22-Mar-28 105 A0311070 SRNL C1S NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 22-Mar-28 106 A0311080 SRNL C1S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 30 23-Mar-28 03-May-28 1061 A0311085 SRNL C1S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 03-May-28 107 A0311090 SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg 25 04-May-28 08-Jun-28 108 A0311100 SRNL C1S USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 09-Jun-28 09-Jun-28 109 A0311110 SRNL C1S USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 09-Jun-28 110 A0311115 SRNL C1S BCOES Certification 15 09-Jun-28 30-Jun-28 111 A0311116 SRNL C1S BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 03-Jul-28 03-Jul-28 112 A0311117 SRNL C1S BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 03-Jul-28 Construction Contracts 629 09-Jun-28 16-Dec-30
001 CON03010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 09-Jun-28 27-Jun-28 002 CON03020 RTA Package OC Review 30 28-Jun-28 09-Aug-28 003 CON03030 Contract Package Contingency 0 10-Aug-28 10-Aug-28 004 CON03040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 10-Aug-28 19-Sep-28 005 CON03050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 20-Sep-28 20-Sep-28 006 CON03060 SRNL C1S Contract RTA (CW400) 0 20-Sep-28
007 CON03070 SRNL C1S Advertise (CW420) 0 20-Sep-28
008 CON03080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 20-Sep-28 31-Oct-28 009 CON03090 SRNL C1S Bid Opening (CW430) 0 31-Oct-28
010 CON03100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 01-Nov-28 01-Dec-28 011 CON03110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 04-Dec-28 04-Dec-28 012 CON03200 SRNL C1S Contract Award (CC800) 0 04-Dec-28 013 CON03210 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 04-Dec-28 03-Mar-29 014 CON03220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 04-Mar-29 08-Mar-29 015 CON03230 SRNL C1S Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 25-May-29 016 CON03240 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 26-May-29 31-May-29 017 CON03250 SRNL C1S Construction Start (CC815) 0 02-Jun-29 018 CON03260 SRNL C1S Construction Contract 547 02-Jun-29 30-Nov-30 019 CON03500 SRNL C1S Construction Complete (CC820) 0 03-Aug-30 020 CON03510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 03-Aug-30 03-Aug-30 021 CON03520 SRNL C1S Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 01-Oct-30 022 CON03530 Process Final Payment 16 02-Oct-30 17-Oct-30 023 CON03540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 02-Oct-30 17-Nov-30 024 CON03550 SRNL C1S Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 30-Nov-30 025 CON03560 SRNL C1S Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 17-Oct-30 026 CON03570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 01-Dec-30 16-Dec-30 027 CON03580 SRNL C1S As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 16-Dec-30 028 CON03590 SRNL C1S O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 17-Nov-30 029 CON03600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 18-Nov-30 20-Nov-30 030 CON03610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 21-Nov-30 25-Nov-30 031 CON03620 SRNL C1S Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 16-Dec-30 Sac River North Levee Contract 2S 1871 08-Jul-24 A 26-Jan-33 PED 1871 08-Jul-24 A 26-Jan-33
056 A0403025 Draft GBOD 340 08-Jul-24 A 09-Dec-26
059 A0403050 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 428 09-Oct-24 A 16-Apr-27 060 A0403055 30% Design Complete Contingency 0 19-Apr-27 19-Apr-27 061 A0403060 SRNL C2S 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 19-Apr-27 062 A0403070 30% Design Review 21 19-Apr-27 17-May-27
063 A0403080 SRNL C2S 30% Revise Design Documents 0 17-May-27 064 A0403090 30% Design ATR Review 41 18-May-27 16-Jul-27 065 A0404010 SRNL C2S Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 18-May-27
066 A0404020 VE Study 36 18-May-27 09-Jul-27
067 A0404030 SRNL C2S VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 09-Jul-27 068 A0405010 SRNL C2S Initiate 60% Design 0 19-Jul-27
069 A0405020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR Contract 2S 110 19-Jul-27 23-Dec-27 070 A0405030 SRNL C2S Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 23-Dec-27 071 A0405040 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 27-Dec-27 31-Jan-28 072 A0405050 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 01-Feb-28 14-Feb-28 073 A0405060 60% Final Analysis and Revisions 10 15-Feb-28 29-Feb-28 074 A0405065 Prepare Final GDR and GBODR 60 01-Mar-28 23-May-28 075 A0405070 SRNL C2S Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225) 0 23-May-28 076 A0405080 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 01-Mar-28 04-Apr-28 077 A0405090 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 05-Apr-28 31-May-28 078 A0405100 Contingency - 60% Design 0 05-Apr-28 05-Apr-28 079 A0405110 SRNL C2S 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 05-Apr-28 080 A0406010 Risk Cadre Report 81 19-Jul-27 10-Nov-27
081 A0406020 SRNL C2S Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 10-Nov-27 082 A0407010 SRNL C2S Initiate 90% Design 0 05-Apr-28
083 A0407020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 05-Apr-28 16-Aug-28 084 A0407030 SRNL C2S Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 16-Aug-28 085 A0407040 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 17-Aug-28 14-Sep-28 086 A0407050 90% Design Review 49 17-Aug-28 26-Oct-28
087 A0407060 Contingency - 90% Design 0 27-Oct-28 27-Oct-28 088 A0407070 SRNL C2S 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 27-Oct-28 089 A0408010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 27-Oct-28 26-Dec-28 090 A0408020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 27-Dec-28 23-Feb-29 093 A0408050 Design Team Responses and Revisions 50 26-Feb-29 04-May-29 094 A0408060 SRNL C2S Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 04-May-29 095 A0408070 Final Design DQC 10 07-May-29 18-May-29
096 A0409010 Final Design P&S Review 21 21-May-29 20-Jun-29 097 A0409020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 21-Jun-29 21-Jun-29 098 A0409030 SRNL C2S Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 21-Jun-29 099 A0409040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 21-Jun-29 02-Aug-29 100 A0410010 Update Environmental Docs 134 19-Jul-27 31-Jan-28 101 A0410020 USACE OC Review 30 01-Feb-28 14-Mar-28
102 A0410030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 158 15-Mar-28 27-Oct-28 103 A0410040 SRNL C2S Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 27-Oct-28 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
SRNL C1S Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
SRNL C1S NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
SRNL C1S USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
SRNL C1S Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C1S SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
SRNL C1S NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C1S NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
SRNL C1S NFS LERRDs Aquisition
SRNL C1S NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
SRNL C1S NFS Utilities Relocation
SRNL C1S NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
SRNL C1S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
SRNL C1S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg
SRNL C1S USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C1S USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) SRNL C1S BCOES Certification
SRNL C1S BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C1S BCOES Complete (CW320)
16-Dec-30, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
SRNL C1S Contract RTA (CW400)
SRNL C1S Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
SRNL C1S Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
SRNL C1S Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval SRNL C1S Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
SRNL C1S Construction Start (CC815)
SRNL C1S Construction Contract
SRNL C1S Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
SRNL C1S Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
SRNL C1S Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
SRNL C1S Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
SRNL C1S As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
SRNL C1S O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
SRNL C1S Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 26-Jan-33, Sac River North Levee Contract 2S
26-Jan-33, PED
Draft GBOD
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
30% Design Complete Contingency
SRNL C2S 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Design Review
SRNL C2S 30% Revise Design Documents
30% Design ATR Review
SRNL C2S Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
SRNL C2S VE/VM Complete (CW290)
SRNL C2S Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR Contract 2S
SRNL C2S Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
60% Final Analysis and Revisions
Prepare Final GDR and GBODR
SRNL C2S Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
SRNL C2S 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
Risk Cadre Report
SRNL C2S Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
SRNL C2S Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
SRNL C2S Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Design Review
Contingency - 90% Design
SRNL C2S 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Design Team Responses and Revisions
SRNL C2S Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
SRNL C2S Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
SRNL C2S Receive Project Bological Opinion
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 3 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 316
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
104 A0410050 NFS Briefing 1 30-Oct-28 30-Oct-28
105 A0410060 SRNL C2S NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 30-Oct-28 106 A0410070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 31-Oct-28 28-Dec-28 107 A0410080 SRNL C2S USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 28-Dec-28
108 A0411010 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 27-Oct-28 04-Dec-28 1081 A0411015 SRNL C2S Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 05-Dec-28 05-Dec-28 109 A0411020 SRNL C2S SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 05-Dec-28 1091 A0411025 SRNL C2S NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 05-Dec-28 05-Dec-28 110 A0411030 SRNL C2S NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 05-Dec-28 111 A0411040 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 05-Dec-28 05-Jul-30 112 A0411050 SRNL C2S NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 05-Dec-28 113 A0411060 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 05-Dec-28 05-Jul-30 114 A0411070 SRNL C2S NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 05-Jul-30 115 A0411080 SRNL C2S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 30 08-Jul-30 16-Aug-30 1151 A0411085 SRNL C2S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 16-Aug-30 116 A0411090 SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg 25 08-Jul-30 09-Aug-30 117 A0411100 SRNL C2S USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 12-Aug-30 12-Aug-30 118 A0411110 SRNL C2S USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 12-Aug-30 1181 A0411115 SRNL C2S BCOES Certification 35 12-Aug-30 30-Sep-30 1182 A0411116 SRNL C2S BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 01-Oct-30 01-Oct-30 1183 A0411120 SRNL C2S BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 01-Oct-30 119 A0411500 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 176 19-Aug-30 01-May-31 120 A0411510 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 02-May-31 19-Mar-32 121 A0411520 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 22-Mar-32 09-Apr-32 122 A0411530 SRNL C2S SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 09-Apr-32 123 A0411540 SPD-RE Review 198 12-Apr-32 26-Jan-33
124 A0411550 SRNL C2S LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 26-Jan-33 Construction Contracts 577 12-Aug-30 01-Dec-32
001 CON04010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 12-Aug-30 27-Aug-30 002 CON04020 RTA Package OC Review 30 28-Aug-30 09-Oct-30 003 CON04030 Contract Package Contingency 0 10-Oct-30 10-Oct-30 004 CON04040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 10-Oct-30 20-Nov-30 005 CON04050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 21-Nov-30 21-Nov-30 006 CON04060 SRNL C2S Contract RTA (CW400) 0 21-Nov-30
007 CON04070 SRNL C2S Advertise (CW420) 0 21-Nov-30
008 CON04080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 21-Nov-30 03-Jan-31 009 CON04090 SRNL C2S Bid Opening (CW430) 0 03-Jan-31
010 CON04100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 06-Jan-31 04-Feb-31 011 CON04110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 05-Feb-31 05-Feb-31 012 CON04210 SRNL C2S Contract Award (CC800) 0 05-Feb-31 013 CON04220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 05-Feb-31 05-May-31 014 CON04230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 06-May-31 10-May-31 015 CON04240 SRNL C2S Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 11-May-31 016 CON04250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 12-May-31 17-May-31 017 CON04260 SRNL C2S Construction Start (CC815) 0 19-May-31 018 CON04270 SRNL C2S Construction Contract 547 19-May-31 15-Nov-32 019 CON04500 SRNL C2S Construction Complete (CC820) 0 19-Jul-32 020 CON04510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 19-Jul-32 19-Jul-32 021 CON04520 SRNL C2S Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 16-Sep-32 022 CON04530 Process Final Payment 16 17-Sep-32 02-Oct-32 023 CON04540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 17-Sep-32 02-Nov-32 024 CON04550 SRNL C2S Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 15-Nov-32 025 CON04560 SRNL C2S Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 02-Oct-32 026 CON04570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 16-Nov-32 01-Dec-32 027 CON04580 SRNL C2S As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 01-Dec-32 028 CON04590 SRNL C2S O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 02-Nov-32 029 CON04600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 03-Nov-32 05-Nov-32 030 CON04610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 06-Nov-32 10-Nov-32 031 CON04620 SRNL C2S Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 01-Dec-32 Sac River North Levee Contract 3E 1668 10-May-24 A 02-Apr-32 PED 1668 10-May-24 A 02-Apr-32
055 A03102130 10% Concept Design & Alternatives Analysis 84 10-May-24 A 01-Dec-25 057 A03103020 SRNL C3E Initiate 30% Design 0 02-Dec-25
058 A03103030 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 02-Dec-25 08-Apr-26 059 A03103040 Contingency - 30% Design 0 09-Apr-26 09-Apr-26 060 A03103050 SRNL C3E 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 09-Apr-26 061 A03103060 30% Technical Reviews 73 09-Apr-26 23-Jul-26 062 A03104010 SRNL C3E Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 26-May-26
063 A03104020 VE Study 36 26-May-26 16-Jul-26
064 A03104030 SRNL C3E VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 16-Jul-26 065 A03105010 SRNL C3E Initiate 60% Design 0 24-Jul-26
066 A03105020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 110 24-Jul-26 31-Dec-26 067 A03105030 SRNL C3E Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 31-Dec-26 068 A03105040 60% Design Final analysis and revisions 44 04-Jan-27 08-Mar-27 069 A03105050 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 09-Mar-27 12-Apr-27 070 A03105060 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 13-Apr-27 08-Jun-27 071 A03105070 Contingency - 60% Design 0 13-Apr-27 13-Apr-27 072 A03105080 SRNL C3E 60% Design Complete (SPK-265) 0 13-Apr-27 073 A03106010 Risk Cadre Report 81 24-Jul-26 18-Nov-26
074 A03106020 SRNL C3E Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 18-Nov-26 075 A03107010 SRNL C3E Initiate 90% Design 0 13-Apr-27
076 A03107020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 13-Apr-27 24-Aug-27 077 A03107030 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 25-Aug-27 22-Sep-27 078 A03107040 SRNL C3E Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 24-Aug-27 079 A03107050 90% Tech Reviews 59 25-Aug-27 18-Nov-27
080 A03107060 Contingency - 90% Design 0 19-Nov-27 19-Nov-27 081 A03107070 SRNL C3E 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 19-Nov-27 082 A03108010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 19-Nov-27 19-Jan-28 083 A03108020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 20-Jan-28 16-Mar-28 084 A03108030 Final BCOES Review 20 17-Mar-28 13-Apr-28 087 A03108060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 14-Apr-28 22-Aug-28 088 A03108070 SRNL C3E Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 22-Aug-28 089 A03109010 Final Design P&S Review 31 23-Aug-28 05-Oct-28 090 A03109020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 06-Oct-28 06-Oct-28 091 A03109030 SRNL C3E Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 06-Oct-28 092 A03109040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 06-Oct-28 20-Nov-28 093 A03110010 Update Environmental Docs 135 24-Jul-26 08-Feb-27 094 A03110020 USACE OC Review 30 09-Feb-27 23-Mar-27
095 A03110030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 157 24-Mar-27 04-Nov-27 096 A03110040 SRNL C3E Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 04-Nov-27 097 A03110050 NFS Briefing 1 05-Nov-27 05-Nov-27
098 A03110060 SRNL C3E NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 05-Nov-27 099 A03110070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 08-Nov-27 06-Jan-28 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 NFS Briefing
SRNL C2S NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
SRNL C2S USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
SRNL C2S Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C2S SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
SRNL C2S NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C2S NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
SRNL C2S NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
SRNL C2S NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
SRNL C2S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
SRNL C2S NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg
SRNL C2S USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C2S USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) SRNL C2S BCOES Certification
SRNL C2S BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C2S BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
SRNL C2S SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
SRNL C2S LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
01-Dec-32, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
SRNL C2S Contract RTA (CW400)
SRNL C2S Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
SRNL C2S Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
SRNL C2S Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval SRNL C2S Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
SRNL C2S Construction Start (CC815)
SRNL C2S Construction Contract
SRNL C2S Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
SRNL C2S Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
SRNL C2S Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
SRNL C2S Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
SRNL C2S As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
SRNL C2S O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
SRNL C2S Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 02-Apr-32, Sac River North Levee Contract 3E
02-Apr-32, PED
10% Concept Design & Alternatives Analysis
SRNL C3E Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Contingency - 30% Design
SRNL C3E 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Technical Reviews
SRNL C3E Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
SRNL C3E VE/VM Complete (CW290)
SRNL C3E Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
SRNL C3E Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Design Final analysis and revisions
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
SRNL C3E 60% Design Complete (SPK-265)
Risk Cadre Report
SRNL C3E Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
SRNL C3E Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
SRNL C3E Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% Tech Reviews
Contingency - 90% Design
SRNL C3E 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final BCOES Review
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
SRNL C3E Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
SRNL C3E Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
SRNL C3E Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
SRNL C3E NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 4 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 317
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
100 A03110080 SRNL C3E USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 06-Jan-28
101 A03111010 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 07-Jan-28 11-Feb-28 1011 A03111015 SRNL C3E Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 14-Feb-28 14-Feb-28 102 A03111020 SRNL C3E SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 14-Feb-28 1021 A03111025 SRNL C3E NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 14-Feb-28 14-Feb-28 103 A03111030 SRNL C3E NFS RE Acquisition Start (CW340) 0 14-Feb-28 104 A03111040 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 14-Feb-28 11-Sep-29 105 A03111050 SRNL C3E NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 14-Feb-28 106 A03111060 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 14-Feb-28 11-Sep-29 107 A03111070 SRNL C3E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 12-Sep-29 30-Nov-29 1071 A03111075 SRNL C3E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 30-Nov-29 108 A03111080 SRNL C3E NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 11-Sep-29 109 A03111090 SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg 55 12-Sep-29 30-Nov-29 110 A03111100 SRNL C3E USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 03-Dec-29 03-Dec-29 111 A03111110 SRNL C3E USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 03-Dec-29 1111 A03111112 SRNL C3E BCOES Certification 15 03-Dec-29 21-Dec-29 1112 A03111113 SRNL C3E BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 24-Dec-29 24-Dec-29 1113 A03111114 SRNL C3E BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 24-Dec-29 112 A03111120 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 03-Dec-29 10-Jul-30 113 A03111130 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 11-Jul-30 27-May-31 114 A03111140 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 28-May-31 17-Jun-31 115 A03111150 SRNL C3E SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 17-Jun-31 116 A03111160 SPD-RE Review 198 18-Jun-31 02-Apr-32
117 A03111170 SRNL C3E LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 02-Apr-32 Construction Contracts 575 03-Dec-29 22-Mar-32
001 CON031010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 03-Dec-29 18-Dec-29 002 CON031020 RTA Package OC Review 30 19-Dec-29 01-Feb-30 003 CON031030 Contract Package Contingency 0 04-Feb-30 04-Feb-30 004 CON031050 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 04-Feb-30 14-Mar-30 005 CON031060 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 15-Mar-30 15-Mar-30 006 CON031070 SRNL C3E Contract RTA (CW400) 0 15-Mar-30 007 CON031080 SRNL C3E Advertise (CW420) 0 15-Mar-30
008 CON031090 Contract Advertisement Period 29 15-Mar-30 24-Apr-30 009 CON031100 SRNL C3E Bid Opening (CW430) 0 24-Apr-30
010 CON031110 Prepare Contract Documents 21 25-Apr-30 23-May-30 011 CON031120 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 24-May-30 24-May-30 012 CON031200 SRNL C3E Contract Award (CC800) 0 24-May-30 013 CON031210 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 24-May-30 21-Aug-30 014 CON031220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 22-Aug-30 26-Aug-30 015 CON031230 SRNL C3E Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 26-Aug-30 016 CON031240 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 27-Aug-30 01-Sep-30 017 CON031250 SRNL C3E Construction Start (CC815) 0 02-Sep-30 018 CON031260 SRNL C3E Construction Contract 547 02-Sep-30 01-Mar-32 019 CON031500 SRNL C3E Construction Complete (CC820) 0 14-Oct-31 020 CON031510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 14-Oct-31 14-Oct-31 021 CON031520 SRNL C3E Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 12-Dec-31 022 CON031530 Process Final Payment 16 13-Dec-31 28-Dec-31 023 CON031540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 13-Dec-31 28-Jan-32 024 CON031550 SRNL C3E Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 01-Mar-32 025 CON031560 SRNL C3E Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 28-Dec-31 026 CON031570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 02-Mar-32 17-Mar-32 027 CON031580 SRNL C3E As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 17-Mar-32 028 CON031590 SRNL C3E O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 28-Jan-32 029 CON031600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 29-Jan-32 31-Jan-32 030 CON031610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 18-Mar-32 22-Mar-32 031 CON031620 SRNL C3E Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 22-Mar-32 Sac River North Levee Contract 4E 1722 02-May-24 A 21-Jun-32 PED 1722 02-May-24 A 21-Jun-32
054 A03202110 10% Concept Design & Alternatives Analysis 84 02-May-24 A 01-Dec-25 056 A03203030 SRNL C4E Initiate 30% Design 0 10-Mar-26
057 A03203040 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 10-Mar-26 14-Jul-26 058 A03203050 Contingency - 30% Design 0 15-Jul-26 15-Jul-26 059 A03203060 SRNL C4E 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 15-Jul-26 060 A03203070 30% Technical Reviews 73 12-Aug-26 25-Nov-26 061 A03204010 SRNL C4E Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 28-Sep-26
062 A03204020 VE Study 36 28-Sep-26 18-Nov-26
063 A03204030 SRNL C4E VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 18-Nov-26 064 A03205010 SRNL C4E Initiate 60% Design 0 27-Nov-26
065 A03205020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 110 27-Nov-26 05-May-27 066 A03205030 SRNL C4E Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 05-May-27 067 A03205040 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 06-May-27 09-Jun-27 068 A03205050 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 10-Jun-27 24-Jun-27 069 A03205060 Final analysis and revisions 10 25-Jun-27 09-Jul-27 070 A03205070 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 12-Jul-27 13-Aug-27 071 A03205080 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 16-Aug-27 12-Oct-27 072 A03205090 Contingency - 60% Design 0 16-Aug-27 16-Aug-27 073 A03205100 SRNL C4E 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 16-Aug-27 074 A03206010 Risk Cadre Report 81 27-Nov-26 25-Mar-27
075 A03206020 SRNL C4E Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 25-Mar-27 076 A03207010 SRNL C4E Initiate 90% Design 0 16-Aug-27
077 A03207020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 16-Aug-27 29-Dec-27 078 A03207030 SRNL C4E Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 29-Dec-27 079 A03207040 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 30-Dec-27 28-Jan-28 080 A03207050 90% Tech Reviews 59 30-Dec-27 24-Mar-28
081 A03207060 Contingency - 90% Design 0 27-Mar-28 27-Mar-28 082 A03207070 SRNL C4E 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 27-Mar-28 083 A03208010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 27-Mar-28 19-May-28 084 A03208020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 22-May-28 19-Jul-28 085 A03208030 Final Tech Reviews 20 20-Jul-28 16-Aug-28 088 A03208060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 17-Aug-28 27-Dec-28 089 A03208070 SRNL C4E Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 27-Dec-28 090 A03208080 Final Design DQC 10 28-Dec-28 11-Jan-29
091 A03209010 Final Design P&S Review 21 12-Jan-29 12-Feb-29 092 A03209020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 13-Feb-29 13-Feb-29 093 A03209030 SRNL C4E Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 13-Feb-29 094 A03209040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 13-Feb-29 27-Mar-29 095 A03210010 Update Environmental Docs 134 27-Nov-26 09-Jun-27 096 A03210020 USACE OC Review 30 10-Jun-27 23-Jul-27
097 A03210030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 158 26-Jul-27 13-Mar-28 098 A03210040 SRNL C4E Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 13-Mar-28 099 A03210050 NFS Briefing 1 14-Mar-28 14-Mar-28
100 A03210060 SRNL C4E NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 14-Mar-28 101 A03210070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 15-Mar-28 09-May-28 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 SRNL C3E USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
SRNL C3E Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C3E SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
SRNL C3E NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C3E NFS RE Acquisition Start (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
SRNL C3E NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
SRNL C3E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
SRNL C3E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
SRNL C3E NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg
SRNL C3E USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C3E USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) SRNL C3E BCOES Certification
SRNL C3E BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C3E BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
SRNL C3E SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
SRNL C3E LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
22-Mar-32, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
SRNL C3E Contract RTA (CW400)
SRNL C3E Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
SRNL C3E Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
SRNL C3E Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval SRNL C3E Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
SRNL C3E Construction Start (CC815)
SRNL C3E Construction Contract
SRNL C3E Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
SRNL C3E Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
SRNL C3E Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
SRNL C3E Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
SRNL C3E As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
SRNL C3E O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
SRNL C3E Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 21-Jun-32, Sac River North Levee Contract 4E
21-Jun-32, PED
10% Concept Design & Alternatives Analysis
SRNL C4E Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Contingency - 30% Design
SRNL C4E 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Technical Reviews
SRNL C4E Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
SRNL C4E VE/VM Complete (CW290)
SRNL C4E Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
SRNL C4E Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
Final analysis and revisions
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
SRNL C4E 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
Risk Cadre Report
SRNL C4E Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
SRNL C4E Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
SRNL C4E Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Tech Reviews
Contingency - 90% Design
SRNL C4E 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
SRNL C4E Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
SRNL C4E Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
SRNL C4E Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
SRNL C4E NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 5 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 318
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
102 A03210080 SRNL C4E USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 09-May-28
103 A03211010 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 27-Mar-28 28-Apr-28 1031 A03211015 SRNL C4E Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 01-May-28 01-May-28 104 A03211020 SRNL C4E SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 01-May-28 1041 A03211025 SRNL C4E NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 01-May-28 01-May-28 105 A03211030 SRNL C4E NFS RE Acquisition Start (CW340) 0 01-May-28 106 A03211040 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 01-May-28 29-Nov-29 107 A03211050 SRNL C4E NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 01-May-28 108 A03211060 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 01-May-28 29-Nov-29 109 A03211070 SRNL C4E NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 29-Nov-29 110 A03211080 SRNL C4E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 30-Nov-29 20-Feb-30 1101 A03211085 SRNL C4E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 20-Feb-30 111 A03211090 SRNL C4E USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 21-Feb-30 21-Feb-30 112 A03211100 SRNL C4E USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 21-Feb-30 1121 A03211102 SRNL C4E BCOES Certification 15 21-Feb-30 13-Mar-30 1122 A03211103 SRNL C4RE BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 14-Mar-30 14-Mar-30 1123 A03211104 SRNL C4E BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 14-Mar-30 113 A03211110 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 21-Feb-30 25-Sep-30 114 A03211120 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 26-Sep-30 13-Aug-31 115 A03211130 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 14-Aug-31 04-Sep-31 116 A03211140 SRNL C4E SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 04-Sep-31 117 A03211150 SPD-RE Review 198 05-Sep-31 21-Jun-32
118 A03211160 SRNL C4E LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 21-Jun-32 Construction Contracts 579 21-Feb-30 11-Jun-32
001 CON032010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 21-Feb-30 08-Mar-30 002 CON032020 RTA Package OC Review 30 11-Mar-30 19-Apr-30 003 CON032030 Contract Package Contingency 0 22-Apr-30 22-Apr-30 004 CON032040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 22-Apr-30 30-May-30 005 CON032050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 31-May-30 31-May-30 006 CON032060 SRNL C4E Contract RTA (CW400) 0 31-May-30 007 CON032070 SRNL C4E Advertise (CW420) 0 31-May-30
008 CON032080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 31-May-30 12-Jul-30 009 CON032090 SRNL C4E Bid Opening (CW430) 0 12-Jul-30
010 CON032100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 15-Jul-30 12-Aug-30 011 CON032110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 13-Aug-30 13-Aug-30 012 CON032200 SRNL C4E Contract Award (CC800) 0 13-Aug-30 013 CON032210 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 13-Aug-30 10-Nov-30 014 CON032220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 11-Nov-30 15-Nov-30 015 CON032230 SRNL C4E Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 15-Nov-30 016 CON032240 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 16-Nov-30 21-Nov-30 017 CON032250 SRNL C4E Construction Start (CC815) 0 22-Nov-30 018 CON032260 SRNL C4E Construction Contract 547 22-Nov-30 21-May-32 019 CON032500 SRNL C4E Construction Complete (CC820) 0 23-Jan-32 020 CON032510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 23-Jan-32 23-Jan-32 021 CON032520 SRNL C4E Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 22-Mar-32 022 CON032530 Process Final Payment 16 23-Mar-32 07-Apr-32 023 CON032540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 23-Mar-32 08-May-32 024 CON032550 SRNL C4E Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 21-May-32 025 CON032560 SRNL C4E Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 07-Apr-32 026 CON032570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 22-May-32 06-Jun-32 027 CON032580 SRNL C4E As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 06-Jun-32 028 CON032590 SRNL C4E O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 08-May-32 029 CON032600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 09-May-32 11-May-32 030 CON032610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 07-Jun-32 11-Jun-32 031 CON032620 SRNL C4E Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 11-Jun-32 UPRR Window 1999 04-Feb-25 A 29-Jul-33
PED 1999 04-Feb-25 A 29-Jul-33
0502 A3211430 UPRR Window AE Contracting 178 04-Feb-25 A 16-Apr-26 0503 A3211460 UPRR Window AE Contract Award (Contingency) 0 17-Apr-26 17-Apr-26 0504 A3211470 UPRR Window AE Contract Award (CW801) 0 17-Apr-26 0505 A3211480 UPRR Window Notice to Proceed 0 17-Apr-26 051 A3211490 Quality Control Plan 15 17-Apr-26 07-May-26 054 A3211520 UPRR Window 10% Concept Design 90 08-May-26 16-Sep-26 055 A3211530 UPRR Window 10% Design Review 42 17-Sep-26 17-Nov-26 057 A3211550 UPRR Window Initiate 30% Design 0 18-Nov-26 058 A3211560 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 18-Nov-26 26-Mar-27 059 A3211570 Contingency - 30% Design 0 29-Mar-27 29-Mar-27 060 A3211580 UPRR Window 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 29-Mar-27 061 A3211590 30% Design Review 47 29-Mar-27 02-Jun-27
062 A3211600 UPRR Window 30% Revise Design Documents 0 02-Jun-27 063 A3211610 30% Design ATR Review 64 03-Jun-27 02-Sep-27 064 A3211620 UPRR Window Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 03-Jun-27 065 A3211630 VE Study 63 03-Jun-27 01-Sep-27
066 A3211640 UPRR Window VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 29-Sep-27 067 A3211650 UPRR Window Initiate 60% Design 0 30-Sep-27 068 A3211660 60% Plans/Specs/DDR/ECIF 115 30-Sep-27 17-Mar-28 069 A3211670 UPRR Window Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 17-Mar-28 070 A3211680 60% Internal Review 24 20-Mar-28 20-Apr-28 071 A3211690 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 20 21-Apr-28 18-May-28 0711 A3211695 60% Design ATR Review 21 19-May-28 20-Jun-28 072 A3211700 Final analysis and revisions 15 21-Jun-28 12-Jul-28 075 A3211730 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 50 13-Jul-28 21-Sep-28 076 A3211740 Contingency - 60% Design 0 22-Sep-28 22-Sep-28 077 A3211750 UPRR Window 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 22-Sep-28 080 A3211780 UPRR Window Initiate 90% Design 0 22-Sep-28 081 A3211790 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 88 22-Sep-28 31-Jan-29 082 A3211800 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 01-Feb-29 01-Mar-29 083 A3211810 90% Design Review 64 01-Feb-29 02-May-29
084 A3211820 Contingency - 90% Design 0 03-May-29 03-May-29 085 A3211830 UPRR Window 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 03-May-29 086 A3211840 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 03-May-29 29-Jun-29 087 A3211850 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 02-Jul-29 27-Aug-29 088 A3211860 Final Tech Reviews 40 28-Aug-29 24-Oct-29
091 A3211870 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 25-Oct-29 07-Mar-30 092 A3211880 UPRR Window Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 07-Mar-30 093 A3211890 Final Design DQC 10 08-Mar-30 21-Mar-30
094 A3211900 Final Design P&S Review 21 22-Mar-30 19-Apr-30 095 A3211910 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 22-Apr-30 22-Apr-30 096 A3211920 UPRR Window Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 22-Apr-30 097 A3211930 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 22-Apr-30 03-Jun-30 098 A3211940 Update Environmental Docs 135 30-Sep-27 14-Apr-28 099 A3211950 USACE OC Review 30 17-Apr-28 26-May-28
100 A3211960 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 157 30-May-28 16-Jan-29 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 SRNL C4E USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
SRNL C4E Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C4E SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
SRNL C4E NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C4E NFS RE Acquisition Start (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
SRNL C4E NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
SRNL C4E NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
SRNL C4E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
SRNL C4E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
SRNL C4E USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C4E USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) SRNL C4E BCOES Certification
SRNL C4RE BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
SRNL C4E BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
SRNL C4E SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
SRNL C4E LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
11-Jun-32, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
SRNL C4E Contract RTA (CW400)
SRNL C4E Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
SRNL C4E Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
SRNL C4E Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval SRNL C4E Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
SRNL C4E Construction Start (CC815)
SRNL C4E Construction Contract
SRNL C4E Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
SRNL C4E Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
SRNL C4E Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
SRNL C4E Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
SRNL C4E As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
SRNL C4E O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
SRNL C4E Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 29-Jul-33, UPRR Window
29-Jul-33, PED
UPRR Window AE Contracting
UPRR Window AE Contract Award (Contingency)
UPRR Window AE Contract Award (CW801)
UPRR Window Notice to Proceed
Quality Control Plan
UPRR Window 10% Concept Design
UPRR Window 10% Design Review
UPRR Window Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Contingency - 30% Design
UPRR Window 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Design Review
UPRR Window 30% Revise Design Documents
30% Design ATR Review
UPRR Window Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
UPRR Window VE/VM Complete (CW290)
UPRR Window Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR/ECIF
UPRR Window Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Internal Review
District Quality Control Review (DQC)
60% Design ATR Review
Final analysis and revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
UPRR Window 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
UPRR Window Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Design Review
Contingency - 90% Design
UPRR Window 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
UPRR Window Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
UPRR Window Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 6 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 319
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
101 A3211970 UPRR Window Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 16-Jan-29 102 A3211980 NFS Briefing 1 17-Jan-29 17-Jan-29
103 A3211990 UPRR Window NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 17-Jan-29 104 A3212000 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 18-Jan-29 15-Mar-29 105 A3212010 UPRR Window USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 15-Mar-29 106 A3212020 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 03-May-29 07-Jun-29 1061 A3212030 UPRR Window Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 08-Jun-29 08-Jun-29 107 A3212040 UPRR Window SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 08-Jun-29 1071 A3212050 UPRR Window NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 08-Jun-29 08-Jun-29 108 A3212060 UPRR Window NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 08-Jun-29 109 A3212070 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 08-Jun-29 09-Jan-31 110 A3212080 UPRR Window NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 08-Jun-29 111 A3212090 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 08-Jun-29 09-Jan-31 112 A3212100 UPRR Window NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 09-Jan-31 113 A3212110 UPRR Window NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 10-Jan-31 31-Mar-31 1131 A3212120 UPRR Window NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 31-Mar-31 114 A3212130 UPRR Window USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 01-Apr-31 01-Apr-31 115 A3212140 UPRR Window USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 01-Apr-31 1151 A3212150 UPRR Window BCOES Certification 15 01-Apr-31 21-Apr-31 1152 A3212160 UPRR Window BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 22-Apr-31 22-Apr-31 1153 A3212170 UPRR Window BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 22-Apr-31 116 A3212180 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 01-Apr-31 04-Nov-31 117 A3212190 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 05-Nov-31 21-Sep-32 118 A3212200 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 22-Sep-32 13-Oct-32 119 A3212210 UPRR Window SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 13-Oct-32 120 A3212220 SPD-RE Review 198 14-Oct-32 29-Jul-33
121 A3212230 UPRR Window LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 29-Jul-33 Construction Contracts 574 01-Apr-31 17-Jul-33
001 CON5240260 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 01-Apr-31 16-Apr-31 002 CON5240270 RTA Package OC Review 30 17-Apr-31 29-May-31 003 CON5240280 Contract Package Contingency 0 30-May-31 30-May-31 004 CON5240290 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 30-May-31 10-Jul-31 005 CON5240300 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 11-Jul-31 11-Jul-31 006 CON5240310 UPRR Window Contract RTA (CW400) 0 11-Jul-31 007 CON5240320 UPRR Window Advertise (CW420) 0 11-Jul-31 008 CON5240330 Contract Advertisement Period 29 11-Jul-31 20-Aug-31 009 CON5240340 UPRR Window Bid Opening (CW430) 0 20-Aug-31 010 CON5240350 Prepare Contract Documents 21 21-Aug-31 19-Sep-31 011 CON5240360 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 22-Sep-31 22-Sep-31 012 CON11210 UPRR Window Contract Award (CC800) 0 22-Sep-31 013 CON11220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 22-Sep-31 20-Dec-31 014 CON11230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 21-Dec-31 25-Dec-31 015 CON11240 UPRR Window Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 25-Dec-31 016 CON11250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 26-Dec-31 31-Dec-31 017 CON11260 UPRR Window Construction Start (CC815) 0 02-Jan-32 018 CON11270 UPRR Window Construction Contract 547 02-Jan-32 01-Jul-33 019 CON11500 UPRR Window Construction Complete (CC820) 0 04-Mar-33 020 CON11510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 04-Mar-33 04-Mar-33 021 CON11520 UPRR Window Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 02-May-33 022 CON11530 Process Final Payment 16 03-May-33 18-May-33 023 CON11540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 03-May-33 18-Jun-33 024 CON11550 UPRR Window Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 01-Jul-33 025 CON11560 UPRR Window Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 18-May-33 026 CON11570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 02-Jul-33 17-Jul-33 027 CON11580 UPRR Window As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 17-Jul-33 028 CON11590 UPRR Window O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 18-Jun-33 029 CON11600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 19-Jun-33 21-Jun-33 030 CON11610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 22-Jun-33 26-Jun-33 031 CON11620 UPRR Window Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 17-Jul-33 Port South Levee 3028 01-Oct-24 A 10-Sep-37
PED 3022 01-Oct-24 A 01-Sep-37
050 A1000000 Port South Await Funds 876 01-Oct-24 A 01-Feb-29 0501 A1000010 Port South Federal Funding Received 0 01-Feb-29 0502 A1000020 Port South AE Contracting 126 02-Feb-29 02-Aug-29 0503 A1000030 Port South AW Contract RTA 21 03-Aug-29 31-Aug-29 0504 A1000040 Port South Contract RTA (CW401) 0 31-Aug-29 0505 A1000050 Port South AE Contract Award (Contingency) 0 04-Sep-29 04-Sep-29 0506 A1000060 Port South AE Contract Award (CW801) 0 04-Sep-29 0507 A1000070 Port South Notice to Proceed 0 02-Nov-29
051 A1001010 Quality Control Plan 15 02-Nov-29 26-Nov-29 053 A1002020 PDT Formulates Plan 16 27-Nov-29 18-Dec-29 054 A1003010 Develop H&H Tech Memo 95 19-Dec-29 06-May-30 055 A1003020 Develop Design Water Surface Profiles 85 07-May-30 06-Sep-30 056 A1003030 Port South Initiate 30% Design 0 09-Sep-30 057 A1003040 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 09-Sep-30 15-Jan-31 058 A1003050 Prepare Draft GBODR 132 16-Jan-31 25-Jul-31 059 A1003060 Contingency - 30% Design 0 28-Jul-31 28-Jul-31 060 A1003070 Port South 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 28-Jul-31 061 A1003080 30% Technical Reviews 73 28-Jul-31 07-Nov-31 062 A1004010 Port South Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 11-Sep-31 063 A1004020 VE Study 36 11-Sep-31 31-Oct-31
064 A1004030 Port South VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 31-Oct-31 065 A1005010 Port South Initiate 60% Design 0 10-Nov-31 066 A1005020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 110 10-Nov-31 19-Apr-32 067 A1005040 Port South Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 19-Apr-32 068 A1005050 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 20-Apr-32 21-May-32 069 A1005060 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 24-May-32 07-Jun-32 070 A1005070 Final analysis and revisions 10 08-Jun-32 22-Jun-32 071 A1005080 Port South H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220) 0 22-Jun-32 072 A1005090 Port South Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225) 0 22-Jun-32 073 A1005100 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 23-Jun-32 28-Jul-32 074 A1005110 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 29-Jul-32 23-Sep-32 075 A1005120 Contingency - 60% Design 0 29-Jul-32 29-Jul-32 076 A1005130 Port South 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 29-Jul-32 077 A1006010 Risk Cadre Report 81 10-Nov-31 09-Mar-32
078 A1006020 Port South Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 09-Mar-32 079 A1007010 Port South Initiate 90% 0 29-Jul-32
080 A1007020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 29-Jul-32 10-Dec-32 081 A1007030 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 13-Dec-32 11-Jan-33 082 A1007040 Port South Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 10-Dec-32 083 A1007050 90% Tech Reviews 59 13-Dec-32 09-Mar-33
084 A1007060 Contingency - 90% Design 0 10-Mar-33 10-Mar-33 085 A1007070 Port South 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 10-Mar-33 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 UPRR Window Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
UPRR Window NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
UPRR Window USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
UPRR Window Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
UPRR Window SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
UPRR Window NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) UPRR Window NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
UPRR Window NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
UPRR Window NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
UPRR Window NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
UPRR Window NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
UPRR Window USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
UPRR Window USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) UPRR Window BCOES Certification
UPRR Window BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
UPRR Window BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
UPRR Window SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
UPRR Window LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
17-Jul-33, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
UPRR Window Contract RTA (CW400)
UPRR Window Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
UPRR Window Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
UPRR Window Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval UPRR Window Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
UPRR Window Construction Start (CC815)
UPRR Window Construction Contract
UPRR Window Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
UPRR Window Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
UPRR Window Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
UPRR Window Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
UPRR Window As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
UPRR Window O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
UPRR Window Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 10-Sep-37, Port South Levee
01-Sep-37, PED
Port South Await Funds
Port South Federal Funding Received
Port South AE Contracting
Port South AW Contract RTA
Port South Contract RTA (CW401)
Port South AE Contract Award (Contingency)
Port South AE Contract Award (CW801)
Port South Notice to Proceed
Quality Control Plan
PDT Formulates Plan
Develop H&H Tech Memo
Develop Design Water Surface Profiles
Port South Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Prepare Draft GBODR
Contingency - 30% Design
Port South 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Technical Reviews
Port South Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
Port South VE/VM Complete (CW290)
Port South Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
Port South Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
Final analysis and revisions
Port South H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220)
Port South Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
Port South 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
Risk Cadre Report
Port South Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
Port South Initiate 90%
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Port South Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% Tech Reviews
Contingency - 90% Design
Port South 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 7 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 320
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
086 A1008010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 10-Mar-33 04-May-33 087 A1008020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 05-May-33 01-Jul-33 088 A1008030 Final Tech Reviews 20 05-Jul-33 01-Aug-33
091 A1008060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 02-Aug-33 09-Dec-33 092 A1008070 Port South Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 09-Dec-33 093 A1008080 Final Design DQC 10 12-Dec-33 23-Dec-33
094 A1009010 Final Design P&S Review 21 27-Dec-33 26-Jan-34 095 A1009020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 27-Jan-34 27-Jan-34 096 A1009030 Port South Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 27-Jan-34 097 A1009040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 27-Jan-34 10-Mar-34 098 A1010010 Update Environmental Docs 134 10-Nov-31 21-May-32 099 A1010020 USACE OC Review 30 24-May-32 07-Jul-32
100 A1010030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 158 08-Jul-32 24-Feb-33 101 A1010040 Port South Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 24-Feb-33 102 A1010050 NFS Briefing 1 25-Feb-33 25-Feb-33
103 A1010060 Port South NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 25-Feb-33 104 A1010070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 28-Feb-33 22-Apr-33 105 A1010080 Port South USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 22-Apr-33 106 A1011100 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 25-Apr-33 27-May-33 1061 A1011105 Port South Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 31-May-33 31-May-33 107 A1011110 Port South SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 31-May-33 1071 A1011115 Port South NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 31-May-33 31-May-33 108 A1011120 Port South NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 31-May-33 109 A1011130 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 31-May-33 29-Dec-34 110 A1011140 Port South NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 31-May-33 111 A1011150 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 31-May-33 29-Dec-34 112 A1011160 Port South NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 29-Dec-34 113 A1011170 Port South NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 45 02-Jan-35 07-Mar-35 1131 A1011175 Port South NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 07-Mar-35 114 A1011180 SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg 55 08-Mar-35 23-May-35 115 A1011190 Port South USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 24-May-35 24-May-35 116 A1011200 Port South USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 24-May-35 117 A1011310 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 176 08-Mar-35 16-Nov-35 118 A1011320 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 19-Nov-35 02-Oct-36 119 A1011330 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 03-Oct-36 24-Oct-36 120 A1011340 Port South SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 24-Oct-36 121 A1011350 SPD-RE Review 198 27-Oct-36 11-Aug-37
122 A1011360 Port South LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 11-Aug-37 123 A1011370 PPMD approval letter routed for signature 15 12-Aug-37 01-Sep-37 124 A1011380 Port South PPMD approval letter signed 0 01-Sep-37 1241 A1011400 Port South MitigationTake Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 31-May-33 31-May-33 125 A1011410 Port South Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 31-May-33 126 A1011420 Port South Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 31-May-33 127 A1011430 LEERDs Aquisition 396 31-May-33 29-Dec-34
128 A1011440 Port South Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 02-Jan-35 21-Mar-35 1281 A1011445 Port South Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 21-Mar-35 129 A1011450 LERRDs Credit Request 66 02-Jan-35 05-Apr-35 130 A1011460 Port South Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 22-Mar-35 22-Mar-35 131 A1011470 Port South Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 22-Mar-35 1311 A1011472 Port South BCOES Certification 15 22-Mar-35 11-Apr-35 1312 A1011473 Port South BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 12-Apr-35 12-Apr-35 1313 A1011474 Port South BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 12-Apr-35 132 A1011480 Completeness Review 110 06-Apr-35 12-Sep-35 133 A1011490 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 13-Sep-35 30-Jul-36 134 A1011510 SPK-RE approval MFR Routing 15 31-Jul-36 20-Aug-36 135 A1011520 Port South SPK-RE approval MFR signed 0 20-Aug-36 136 A1011530 SPD-RE review 198 21-Aug-36 05-Jun-37
137 A1011540 Port South Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370) 0 05-Jun-37 138 A1011550 PPMD Approval Letter Routing 15 08-Jun-37 29-Jun-37 139 A1011560 Port South PPMD approval letter signed 0 29-Jun-37 Construction Contracts 575 24-May-35 10-Sep-37
001 CON10010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 24-May-35 11-Jun-35 002 CON10020 RTA Package OC Review 30 12-Jun-35 25-Jul-35 003 CON10030 Contract Package Contingency 0 26-Jul-35 26-Jul-35 004 CON10040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 26-Jul-35 04-Sep-35 005 CON10050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 05-Sep-35 05-Sep-35 006 CON10060 Port South Contract RTA (CW400) 0 05-Sep-35 007 CON10070 Port South Advertise (CW420) 0 05-Sep-35
008 CON10080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 05-Sep-35 16-Oct-35 009 CON10090 Port South Bid Opening (CW430) 0 16-Oct-35 010 CON10100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 17-Oct-35 15-Nov-35 011 CON10110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 16-Nov-35 16-Nov-35 012 CON10210 Port South Contract Award (CC800) 0 16-Nov-35 013 CON10220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 16-Nov-35 13-Feb-36 014 CON10230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 14-Feb-36 18-Feb-36 015 CON10240 Port South Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 18-Feb-36 016 CON10250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 19-Feb-36 24-Feb-36 017 CON10260 Port South Construction Start (CC815) 0 26-Feb-36 018 CON10270 Port South Construction Contract 547 26-Feb-36 25-Aug-37 019 CON10500 Port South Construction Complete (CC820) 0 28-Apr-37 020 CON10510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 28-Apr-37 28-Apr-37 021 CON10520 Port South Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 26-Jun-37 022 CON10530 Process Final Payment 16 27-Jun-37 12-Jul-37 023 CON10540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 27-Jun-37 12-Aug-37 024 CON10550 Port South Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 25-Aug-37 025 CON10560 Port South Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 12-Jul-37 026 CON10570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 26-Aug-37 10-Sep-37 027 CON10580 Port South As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 10-Sep-37 028 CON10590 Port South O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 12-Aug-37 029 CON10600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 13-Aug-37 15-Aug-37 030 CON10610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 16-Aug-37 20-Aug-37 031 CON10620 Port South Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 10-Sep-37 Stone Lock 1769 18-Nov-24 A 26-Aug-32
PED 1689 18-Nov-24 A 03-May-32
056 A0502110 10% Concept Design 166 18-Nov-24 A 31-Mar-26 0561 A0502120 Alternatives Analysis 63 01-Apr-26 30-Jun-26 0562 A0502130 Select Alternatives (SPD-CW-001) 0 30-Jun-26 060 A0503040 Stone Lock Closure Initiate 30% Design 0 01-Jul-26 061 A0503050 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 01-Jul-26 04-Nov-26 062 A0503060 Contingency - 30% Design 0 05-Nov-26 05-Nov-26 063 A0503070 Stone Lock Closure 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 05-Nov-26 064 A0503080 30% Design Review 21 05-Nov-26 07-Dec-26
065 A0503090 Stone Lock Closure 30% Revise Design Documents 0 07-Dec-26 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
Port South Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
Port South Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
Port South Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
Port South NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
Port South USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
Port South Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
Port South SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
Port South NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
Port South NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
Port South NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
Port South NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
Port South NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
Port South NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
SPK RE Processes Certified RE Pkg
Port South USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
Port South USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
Port South SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
Port South LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
PPMD approval letter routed for signature
Port South PPMD approval letter signed
Port South MitigationTake Letter Contingency (CONT)
Port South Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) Port South Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) LEERDs Aquisition
Port South Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
Port South Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) LERRDs Credit Request
Port South Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) Port South Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) Port South BCOES Certification
Port South BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
Port South BCOES Complete (CW320)
Completeness Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE approval MFR Routing
Port South SPK-RE approval MFR signed
SPD-RE review
Port South Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370)
PPMD Approval Letter Routing
Port South PPMD approval letter signed
10-Sep-37, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
Port South Contract RTA (CW400)
Port South Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
Port South Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
Port South Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval Port South Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
Port South Construction Start (CC815)
Port South Construction Contract
Port South Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
Port South Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
Port South Construction Contract Complete (CC
Port South Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
Port South As-Built Drawings Complete (CC8
Port South O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-2
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
Port South Notice of Project Completion/Assu
26-Aug-32, Stone Lock
03-May-32, PED
10% Concept Design
Alternatives Analysis
Select Alternatives (SPD-CW-001)
Stone Lock Closure Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Contingency - 30% Design
Stone Lock Closure 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Design Review
Stone Lock Closure 30% Revise Design Documents
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 8 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 321
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
066 A0503100 30% Design ATR Review 41 08-Dec-26 05-Feb-27 067 A0504010 Stone Lock Closure Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 08-Dec-26 068 A0504020 VE Study 36 08-Dec-26 29-Jan-27
069 A0504030 Stone Lock Closure VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 29-Jan-27 070 A0505010 Stone Lock Closure Initiate 60% Design 0 08-Feb-27 071 A0505020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 100 08-Feb-27 30-Jun-27 072 A0505030 Stone Lock Closure Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 30-Jun-27 073 A0505040 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 01-Jul-27 04-Aug-27 074 A0505050 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 05-Aug-27 18-Aug-27 075 A0505060 Final analysis and revisions 10 19-Aug-27 01-Sep-27 076 A0505070 Stone Lock Closure Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225) 0 01-Sep-27 077 A0505080 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 02-Sep-27 07-Oct-27 078 A0505090 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 08-Oct-27 07-Dec-27 079 A0505100 Contingency - 60% Design 0 08-Oct-27 08-Oct-27 080 A0505110 Stone Lock Closure 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 08-Oct-27 081 A0506010 Risk Cadre Report 81 08-Feb-27 02-Jun-27
082 A0506020 Stone Lock Closure Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 02-Jun-27 083 A0507010 Stone Lock Closure Initiate 90% Design 0 08-Oct-27 084 A0507020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 08-Oct-27 24-Feb-28 085 A0507030 Stone Lock Closure Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 24-Feb-28 086 A0507040 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 25-Feb-28 23-Mar-28 087 A0507050 90% Design Review 59 25-Feb-28 17-May-28
088 A0507060 Contingency - 90% Design 0 18-May-28 18-May-28 089 A0507070 Stone Lock Closure 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 18-May-28 090 A0508010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 18-May-28 17-Jul-28 091 A0508020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 30 18-Jul-28 28-Aug-28 092 A0508030 Final Tech Reviews 40 29-Aug-28 25-Oct-28
095 A0508060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 26-Oct-28 08-Mar-29 096 A0508070 Stone Lock Closure Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310)0 08-Mar-29 097 A0508080 Final Design DQC 10 09-Mar-29 22-Mar-29
098 A0508090 Final Design P&S Review 21 23-Mar-29 20-Apr-29 099 A0508100 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 23-Apr-29 23-Apr-29 100 A0508110 Stone Lock Closure Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 23-Apr-29 101 A0508120 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 23-Apr-29 04-Jun-29 102 A0510010 Update Environmental Docs 135 08-Feb-27 19-Aug-27 103 A0510020 USACE OC Review 30 20-Aug-27 01-Oct-27
104 A0510030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 157 04-Oct-27 18-May-28 105 A0510040 Stone Lock Closure Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 18-May-28 106 A0510050 NFS Briefing 1 19-May-28 19-May-28
107 A0510060 Stone Lock Closure NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 19-May-28 108 A0510070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 22-May-28 19-Jul-28 109 A0510080 Stone Lock Closure USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 19-Jul-28 110 A0511100 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 13-Jun-28 19-Jul-28 1101 A0511105 Stone Lock Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 20-Jul-28 20-Jul-28 111 A0511110 Stone Lock Closure SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 20-Jul-28 1111 A0511115 Stone Lock NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 20-Jul-28 20-Jul-28 112 A0511120 Stone Lock Closure NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 20-Jul-28 113 A0511130 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 20-Jul-28 20-Feb-30 114 A0511140 Stone Lock Closure NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 20-Jul-28 115 A0511150 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 20-Jul-28 20-Feb-30 116 A0511160 Stone Lock Closure NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 20-Feb-30 117 A0511170 Stone Lock NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 21-Feb-30 08-May-30 1171 A0511175 Stone Lock NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 08-May-30 118 A0511180 Stone Lock USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 09-May-30 09-May-30 119 A0511190 Stone Lock Closure USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 09-May-30 1191 A0511192 BCOES Certification 15 09-May-30 30-May-30 1192 A0511193 Stone Lock BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 31-May-30 31-May-30 1193 A0511194 Stone Lock Closure BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 31-May-30 120 A0511300 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 09-May-30 16-Dec-30 121 A0511310 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 132 17-Dec-30 26-Jun-31 122 A0511320 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 27-Jun-31 18-Jul-31 123 A0511330 Stone Lock Closure SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 18-Jul-31 124 A0511340 SPD-RE Review 198 21-Jul-31 03-May-32
125 A0511350 Stone Lock Closure LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 03-May-32 Construction Contracts 576 09-May-30 26-Aug-32
001 CON05010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 09-May-30 24-May-30 002 CON05020 RTA Package OC Review 30 28-May-30 10-Jul-30 003 CON05030 Contract Package Contingency 0 11-Jul-30 11-Jul-30 004 CON05040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 11-Jul-30 19-Aug-30 005 CON05050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 20-Aug-30 20-Aug-30 006 CON05060 Stone Lock Closure Contract RTA (CW400) 0 20-Aug-30 007 CON05070 Stone Lock Closure Advertise (CW420) 0 20-Aug-30 008 CON05080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 20-Aug-30 30-Sep-30 009 CON05090 Stone Lock Closure Bid Opening (CW430) 0 30-Sep-30 010 CON05100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 01-Oct-30 30-Oct-30 011 CON05110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 31-Oct-30 31-Oct-30 012 CON05210 Stone Lock Closure Contract Award (CC800) 0 31-Oct-30 013 CON05220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 31-Oct-30 28-Jan-31 014 CON05230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 29-Jan-31 02-Feb-31 015 CON05240 Stone Lock Closure Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 03-Feb-31 016 CON05250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 04-Feb-31 09-Feb-31 017 CON05260 Stone Lock Closure Construction Start (CC815) 0 11-Feb-31 018 CON05270 Stone Lock Closure Construction Contract 547 11-Feb-31 10-Aug-32 019 CON05500 Stone Lock Closure Construction Complete (CC820) 0 13-Apr-32 020 CON05510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 13-Apr-32 13-Apr-32 021 CON05520 Stone Lock Closure Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 11-Jun-32 022 CON05530 Process Final Payment 16 12-Jun-32 27-Jun-32 023 CON05540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 12-Jun-32 28-Jul-32 024 CON05550 Stone Lock Closure Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 10-Aug-32 025 CON05560 Stone Lock Closure Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 27-Jun-32 026 CON05570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 11-Aug-32 26-Aug-32 027 CON05580 Stone Lock Closure As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 26-Aug-32 028 CON05590 Stone Lock Closure O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 28-Jul-32 029 CON05600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 29-Jul-32 31-Jul-32 030 CON05610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 01-Aug-32 05-Aug-32 031 CON05620 Stone Lock Closure Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 26-Aug-32 Deep Water Ship Channel East Levee Seepage/Stability Contract 2718 01-Oct-24 A 13-Jun-36 PED 2718 01-Oct-24 A 13-Jun-36
050 A0700000 DWSC E Await Funds 625 01-Oct-24 A 01-Feb-28 0501 A0700010 DWSC E Federal Funding Received 0 01-Feb-28 0502 A0700020 DWSC E AE Contracting 126 02-Feb-28 01-Aug-28 0503 A0700030 DWSC E AW Contract RTA 21 02-Aug-28 30-Aug-28 0504 A0700040 DWSC E Contract RTA (CW401) 0 30-Aug-28
FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 30% Design ATR Review
Stone Lock Closure Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
Stone Lock Closure VE/VM Complete (CW290)
Stone Lock Closure Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
Stone Lock Closure Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
Final analysis and revisions
Stone Lock Closure Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
Stone Lock Closure 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
Risk Cadre Report
Stone Lock Closure Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
Stone Lock Closure Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
Stone Lock Closure Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Design Review
Contingency - 90% Design
Stone Lock Closure 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
Stone Lock Closure Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
Stone Lock Closure Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
Stone Lock Closure Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
Stone Lock Closure NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
Stone Lock Closure USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
Stone Lock Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
Stone Lock Closure SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
Stone Lock NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
Stone Lock Closure NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) NFS LERRDs Aquisition
Stone Lock Closure NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) NFS Utilities Relocation
Stone Lock Closure NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) Stone Lock NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
Stone Lock NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
Stone Lock USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
Stone Lock Closure USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) BCOES Certification
Stone Lock BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
Stone Lock Closure BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
Stone Lock Closure SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
Stone Lock Closure LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
26-Aug-32, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
Stone Lock Closure Contract RTA (CW400)
Stone Lock Closure Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
Stone Lock Closure Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
Stone Lock Closure Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval Stone Lock Closure Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
Stone Lock Closure Construction Start (CC815)
Stone Lock Closure Construction Contract
Stone Lock Closure Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
Stone Lock Closure Construction Physically complete (CC840) Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
Stone Lock Closure Construction Contract Complete (CC830) Stone Lock Closure Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
Stone Lock Closure As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
Stone Lock Closure O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
Stone Lock Closure Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 13-Jun-36, Deep Water Ship Channel East Levee Seepage/Stability Contract 13-Jun-36, PED
DWSC E Await Funds
DWSC E Federal Funding Received
DWSC E AE Contracting
DWSC E AW Contract RTA
DWSC E Contract RTA (CW401)
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 9 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 322
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
0505 A0700050 DWSC E AE Contract Award (Contingency) 0 31-Aug-28 31-Aug-28 0506 A0700060 DWSC E AE Contract Award (CW801) 0 31-Aug-28 0507 A0700070 DWSC E Notice to Proceed 0 01-Nov-28
051 A0701010 Quality Control Plan 15 01-Nov-28 22-Nov-28 053 A0702020 PDT Formulates Plan 16 24-Nov-28 15-Dec-28 054 A0703010 Establish Design Flood Condition 90 18-Dec-28 26-Apr-29 055 A0703020 Design Water Surface Profiles 90 27-Apr-29 05-Sep-29 056 A0703030 DWSC E Initiate 30% Design 0 06-Sep-29
057 A0703040 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 06-Sep-29 14-Jan-30 058 A0703050 Prepare Draft HBOD, GDR and GBODR 109 15-Jan-30 20-Jun-30 059 A0703060 Contingency - 30% Design 0 21-Jun-30 21-Jun-30 060 A0703070 DWSC E 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 21-Jun-30 061 A0703080 30% Technical Reviews 73 21-Jun-30 03-Oct-30 062 A0704010 DWSC E Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 07-Aug-30
063 A0704020 VE Study 36 07-Aug-30 26-Sep-30
064 A0704030 DWSC E VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 26-Sep-30
065 A0705010 DWSC E Initiate 60% Design 0 04-Oct-30
066 A0705020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 110 04-Oct-30 17-Mar-31 067 A0705030 DWSC E Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 17-Mar-31 068 A0705040 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 18-Mar-31 18-Apr-31 069 A0705050 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 21-Apr-31 02-May-31 070 A0705060 Final analysis and revisions 10 05-May-31 16-May-31 071 A0705070 DWSC E H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220) 0 16-May-31 072 A0705080 DWSC E Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225) 0 16-May-31 073 A0705090 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 19-May-31 24-Jun-31 074 A0705100 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 25-Jun-31 20-Aug-31 075 A0705110 Contingency - 60% Design 0 25-Jun-31 25-Jun-31 076 A0705120 DWSC E 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 25-Jun-31 077 A0706010 Risk Cadre Report 81 04-Oct-30 03-Feb-31
078 A0706020 DWSC E Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 03-Feb-31 079 A0707010 DWSC E Initiate 90% 0 25-Jun-31
080 A0707020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 88 25-Jun-31 29-Oct-31 081 A0707030 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 30-Oct-31 28-Nov-31 082 A0707040 90% Tech Reviews 69 30-Oct-31 10-Feb-32
083 A0707050 Contingency - 90% Design 0 11-Feb-32 11-Feb-32 084 A0707060 DWSC E 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 11-Feb-32 085 A0708010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 11-Feb-32 07-Apr-32 086 A0708020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 08-Apr-32 03-Jun-32 087 A0708030 Final Tech Reviews 40 04-Jun-32 02-Aug-32
090 A0708060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 03-Aug-32 10-Dec-32 091 A0708070 DWSC E Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 10-Dec-32 092 A0708080 Final Design DQC 10 13-Dec-32 27-Dec-32
093 A0709010 Final Design P&S Review 21 28-Dec-32 27-Jan-33 094 A0709020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 28-Jan-33 28-Jan-33 095 A0709030 DWSC E Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 28-Jan-33 096 A0709040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 28-Jan-33 11-Mar-33 097 A0710010 Update Environmental Docs 134 04-Oct-30 18-Apr-31 098 A0710020 USACE OC Review 30 21-Apr-31 02-Jun-31
099 A0710030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 158 03-Jun-31 21-Jan-32 100 A0710040 DWSC E Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 21-Jan-32 101 A0710050 NFS Briefing 1 22-Jan-32 22-Jan-32
102 A0710060 DWSC E NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 22-Jan-32 103 A0710070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 23-Jan-32 19-Mar-32 104 A0710080 DWSC E USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 19-Mar-32
105 A0711100 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 22-Mar-32 23-Apr-32 1051 A0711105 DWSC E Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 26-Apr-32 26-Apr-32 106 A0711110 DWSC E SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 26-Apr-32 1061 A0711115 DWSC E NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 26-Apr-32 26-Apr-32 107 A0711120 DWSC E NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 26-Apr-32 108 A0711130 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 26-Apr-32 23-Nov-33 109 A0711140 DWSC E NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 26-Apr-32 110 A0711150 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 26-Apr-32 23-Nov-33 111 A0711160 DWSC E NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 23-Nov-33 112 A0711170 DWSC E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 25-Nov-33 14-Feb-34 1121 A0711175 DWSC E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 14-Feb-34 113 A0711180 DWSC E USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 15-Feb-34 15-Feb-34 114 A0711190 DWSC E USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 15-Feb-34 1141 A0711192 DWSC E BCOES Certification 15 15-Feb-34 08-Mar-34 1142 A0711193 DWSC E BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 09-Mar-34 09-Mar-34 1143 A0711194 DWSC E BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 09-Mar-34 115 A0711300 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 15-Feb-34 20-Sep-34 116 A0711310 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 21-Sep-34 08-Aug-35 117 A0711320 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 09-Aug-35 29-Aug-35 118 A0711330 DWSC E SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 29-Aug-35 119 A0711340 SPD-RE Review 198 30-Aug-35 13-Jun-36
120 A0711350 DWSC E LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 13-Jun-36 1201 A0711495 DWSC E Mitigation Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 26-Apr-32 26-Apr-32 121 A0711500 DWSC E Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 26-Apr-32 122 A0711510 DWSC E Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 26-Apr-32 123 A0711520 LEERDs Aquisition 396 26-Apr-32 23-Nov-33
124 A0711530 DWSC E Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 25-Nov-33 14-Feb-34 1241 A0711535 DWSC E Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 14-Feb-34 125 A0711540 LERRDs Credit Request 66 25-Nov-33 02-Mar-34 126 A0711550 [Feature] Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 15-Feb-34 15-Feb-34 127 A0711560 DWSC E Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 15-Feb-34 128 A0711570 Completeness Review 110 03-Mar-34 08-Aug-34 129 A0711580 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 09-Aug-34 26-Jun-35 130 A0711590 SPK-RE approval MFR Routing 15 27-Jun-35 18-Jul-35 131 A0711600 DWSC E SPK-RE approval MFR signed 0 18-Jul-35 132 A0711610 SPD-RE review 198 19-Jul-35 01-May-36
133 A0711620 DWSC E Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370) 0 01-May-36 134 A0711630 PPMD Approval Letter Routing 15 02-May-36 22-May-36 135 A0711640 DWSC E PPMD approval letter signed 0 22-May-36 Construction Contracts 576 15-Feb-34 03-Jun-36
001 CON07010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 15-Feb-34 03-Mar-34 002 CON07020 RTA Package OC Review 30 06-Mar-34 14-Apr-34 003 CON07030 Contract Package Contingency 0 17-Apr-34 17-Apr-34 004 CON07040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 17-Apr-34 24-May-34 005 CON07050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 25-May-34 25-May-34 006 CON07060 DWSC E Contract RTA (CW400) 0 25-May-34
007 CON07070 DWSC E Advertise (CW420) 0 25-May-34
008 CON07080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 25-May-34 07-Jul-34 009 CON07090 DWSC E Bid Opening (CW430) 0 07-Jul-34
010 CON07100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 10-Jul-34 07-Aug-34 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 DWSC E AE Contract Award (Contingency)
DWSC E AE Contract Award (CW801)
DWSC E Notice to Proceed
Quality Control Plan
PDT Formulates Plan
Establish Design Flood Condition
Design Water Surface Profiles
DWSC E Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Prepare Draft HBOD, GDR and GBODR
Contingency - 30% Design
DWSC E 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Technical Reviews
DWSC E Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
DWSC E VE/VM Complete (CW290)
DWSC E Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
DWSC E Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
Final analysis and revisions
DWSC E H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220)
DWSC E Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
DWSC E 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
Risk Cadre Report
DWSC E Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
DWSC E Initiate 90%
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Tech Reviews
Contingency - 90% Design
DWSC E 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
DWSC E Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
DWSC E Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
DWSC E Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
DWSC E NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
DWSC E USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
DWSC E Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
DWSC E SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
DWSC E NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
DWSC E NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
DWSC E NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
DWSC E NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
DWSC E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
DWSC E NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001)
DWSC E USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
DWSC E USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) DWSC E BCOES Certification
DWSC E BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
DWSC E BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
DWSC E SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
DWSC E LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
DWSC E Mitigation Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
DWSC E Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
DWSC E Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
LEERDs Aquisition
DWSC E Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
DWSC E Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) LERRDs Credit Request
[Feature] Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) DWSC E Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) Completeness Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE approval MFR Routing
DWSC E SPK-RE approval MFR signed
SPD-RE review
DWSC E Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370)
PPMD Approval Letter Routing
DWSC E PPMD approval letter signed
03-Jun-36, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
DWSC E Contract RTA (CW400)
DWSC E Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
DWSC E Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 10 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 323
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
011 CON07110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 08-Aug-34 08-Aug-34 012 CON07210 DWSC E Contract Award (CC800) 0 08-Aug-34
013 CON07220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 08-Aug-34 05-Nov-34 014 CON07230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 06-Nov-34 10-Nov-34 015 CON07240 DWSC E Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 11-Nov-34 016 CON07250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 12-Nov-34 17-Nov-34 017 CON07260 DWSC E Construction Start (CC815) 0 19-Nov-34 018 CON07270 DWSC E Construction Contract 547 19-Nov-34 18-May-36 019 CON07500 DWSC E Construction Complete (CC820) 0 20-Jan-36 020 CON07510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 20-Jan-36 20-Jan-36 021 CON07520 DWSC E Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 19-Mar-36 022 CON07530 Process Final Payment 16 20-Mar-36 04-Apr-36 023 CON07540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 20-Mar-36 05-May-36 024 CON07550 DWSC E Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 18-May-36 025 CON07560 DWSC E Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 04-Apr-36 026 CON07570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 19-May-36 03-Jun-36 027 CON07580 DWSC E As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 03-Jun-36 028 CON07590 DWSC E O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 05-May-36 029 CON07600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 06-May-36 08-May-36 030 CON07610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 09-May-36 13-May-36 031 CON07620 DWSC E Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 03-Jun-36 Deep Water Ship Channel West Levee Seepage/Stability Contract 2685 01-Oct-24 A 28-Apr-36 PED 2654 01-Oct-24 A 14-Mar-36
050 A0800000 DWSC W Await Funds 376 01-Oct-24 A 02-Feb-27 0501 A0800010 DWSC W Federal Funding Received 0 02-Feb-27 0502 A0800020 DWSC W AE Contracting 126 03-Feb-27 03-Aug-27 0503 A0800030 DWSC W AW Contract RTA 21 04-Aug-27 01-Sep-27 0504 A0800040 DWSC W Contract RTA (CW401) 0 01-Sep-27
0505 A0800050 DWSC W AE Contract Award (Contingency) 0 02-Sep-27 02-Sep-27 0506 A0800060 DWSC W AE Contract Award (CW801) 0 02-Sep-27 0507 A0800070 DWSC W Notice to Proceed 0 03-Nov-27
051 A0801010 Quality Control Plan 15 03-Nov-27 24-Nov-27 053 A0802020 PDT Formulates Plan 16 26-Nov-27 17-Dec-27 054 A0803010 Establish Design Flood Condition 90 20-Dec-27 27-Apr-28 055 A0803020 Subsurface Exploration and Analysis 262 28-Apr-28 15-May-29 056 A0803030 Design Water Surface Profiles 90 16-May-29 24-Sep-29 057 A0803040 DWSC W Initiate 30% Design 0 25-Sep-29
058 A0803050 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 145 25-Sep-29 24-Apr-30 059 A0803060 Contingency - 30% Design 0 25-Apr-30 25-Apr-30 060 A0803070 DWSC W 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 25-Apr-30 061 A0803080 30% Technical Reviews 73 25-Apr-30 08-Aug-30 062 A0804010 DWSC W Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 11-Jun-30
063 A0804020 VE Study 36 11-Jun-30 01-Aug-30
064 A0804030 DWSC W VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 01-Aug-30
065 A0805010 DWSC W Initiate 60% Design 0 09-Aug-30
066 A0805020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 110 09-Aug-30 17-Jan-31 067 A0805030 DWSC W Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 17-Jan-31 068 A0805040 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 21-Jan-31 24-Feb-31 069 A0805050 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 25-Feb-31 10-Mar-31 070 A0805060 Final analysis and revisions 10 11-Mar-31 24-Mar-31 071 A0805070 DWSC W H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220) 0 24-Mar-31 072 A0805080 DWSC W Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225) 0 24-Mar-31 073 A0805090 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 25-Mar-31 28-Apr-31 074 A0805100 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 29-Apr-31 25-Jun-31 075 A0805110 Contingency - 60% Design 0 29-Apr-31 29-Apr-31 076 A0805120 DWSC W 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 29-Apr-31 077 A0806010 Risk Cadre Report 81 09-Aug-30 05-Dec-30
078 A0806020 DWSC W Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 05-Dec-30 079 A0807010 DWSC W Initiate 90% Design 0 29-Apr-31
080 A0807020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 93 29-Apr-31 10-Sep-31 081 A0807030 DWSC W Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 10-Sep-31 082 A0807040 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 11-Sep-31 08-Oct-31 083 A0807050 90% Tech Reviews 59 11-Sep-31 05-Dec-31
084 A0807060 Contingency - 90% Design 0 08-Dec-31 08-Dec-31 085 A0807070 DWSC W 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 08-Dec-31 086 A0808010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 08-Dec-31 04-Feb-32 087 A0808020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 05-Feb-32 01-Apr-32 088 A0808030 Final Tech Reviews 40 02-Apr-32 27-May-32
091 A0808060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 28-May-32 06-Oct-32 092 A0808070 DWSC W Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 06-Oct-32 093 A0808080 Final Design DQC 10 07-Oct-32 21-Oct-32
094 A0809010 Final Design P&S Review 21 22-Oct-32 22-Nov-32 095 A0809020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 23-Nov-32 23-Nov-32 096 A0809030 DWSC W Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 23-Nov-32 097 A0809040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 23-Nov-32 06-Jan-33 098 A0810010 Update Environmental Docs 134 09-Aug-30 24-Feb-31 099 A0810020 USACE OC Review 30 25-Feb-31 07-Apr-31
100 A0810030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 158 08-Apr-31 21-Nov-31 101 A0810040 DWSC W Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 21-Nov-31 102 A0810050 NFS Briefing 1 24-Nov-31 24-Nov-31
103 A0810060 DWSC W NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 24-Nov-31 104 A0810070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 25-Nov-31 23-Jan-32 105 A0810080 DWSC W USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 23-Jan-32
106 A0811110 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 08-Dec-31 13-Jan-32 1061 A0811115 DWSC W Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 14-Jan-32 14-Jan-32 107 A0811120 DWSC W SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 14-Jan-32 1071 A0811125 DWSC W NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 14-Jan-32 14-Jan-32 108 A0811130 DWSC W NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 26-Jan-32 109 A0811140 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 26-Jan-32 22-Aug-33 110 A0811150 DWSC W NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 26-Jan-32 111 A0811160 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 26-Jan-32 22-Aug-33 112 A0811170 DWSC W NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 22-Aug-33 113 A0811180 Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 23-Aug-33 09-Nov-33 114 A0811190 DWSC W USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 10-Nov-33 10-Nov-33 115 A0811195 DWSC W USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 10-Nov-33 1151 A0811197 DWSC W BCOES Certification 15 10-Nov-33 02-Dec-33 1152 A0811198 DWSC W BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 05-Dec-33 05-Dec-33 1153 A0811199 DWSC W BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 05-Dec-33 116 A0811300 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 10-Nov-33 20-Jun-34 117 A0811310 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 21-Jun-34 07-May-35 118 A0811320 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 08-May-35 29-May-35 119 A0811330 DWSC W SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 29-May-35 120 A0811340 SPD-RE Review 198 30-May-35 14-Mar-36
121 A0811350 DWSC W LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 14-Mar-36 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 Contingency for Construction Contract Award
DWSC E Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval DWSC E Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
DWSC E Construction Start (CC815)
DWSC E Construction Contract
DWSC E Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
DWSC E Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
DWSC E Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
DWSC E Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
DWSC E As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
DWSC E O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
DWSC E Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 28-Apr-36, Deep Water Ship Channel West Levee Seepage/Stability Contract 14-Mar-36, PED
DWSC W Await Funds
DWSC W Federal Funding Received
DWSC W AE Contracting
DWSC W AW Contract RTA
DWSC W Contract RTA (CW401)
DWSC W AE Contract Award (Contingency)
DWSC W AE Contract Award (CW801)
DWSC W Notice to Proceed
Quality Control Plan
PDT Formulates Plan
Establish Design Flood Condition
Subsurface Exploration and Analysis
Design Water Surface Profiles
DWSC W Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Contingency - 30% Design
DWSC W 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Technical Reviews
DWSC W Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
DWSC W VE/VM Complete (CW290)
DWSC W Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
DWSC W Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
Final analysis and revisions
DWSC W H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220)
DWSC W Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
DWSC W 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
Risk Cadre Report
DWSC W Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
DWSC W Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
DWSC W Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Tech Reviews
Contingency - 90% Design
DWSC W 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
DWSC W Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
DWSC W Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
DWSC W Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
DWSC W NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
DWSC W USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
DWSC W Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
DWSC W SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
DWSC W NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT)
DWSC W NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
DWSC W NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380)
NFS Utilities Relocation
DWSC W NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390)
Certified Real Estate Pkg
DWSC W USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT)
DWSC W USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) DWSC W BCOES Certification
DWSC W BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
DWSC W BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
DWSC W SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
DWSC W LERRD Credits Certified (CW370)
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 11 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 324
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
1211 A0811495 DWSC W MitigationTake Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 14-Jan-32 14-Jan-32 122 A0811500 DWSC W Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 14-Jan-32 123 A0811510 DWSC W Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 14-Jan-32 124 A0811520 LEERDs Aquisition 396 14-Jan-32 11-Aug-33
125 A0811530 DWSC W Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 12-Aug-33 31-Oct-33 1251 A0811535 DWSC W Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 31-Oct-33 126 A0811540 DWSC W Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 01-Nov-33 01-Nov-33 127 A0811550 DWSC W Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 01-Nov-33 128 A0811560 LERRDs Credit Request 66 12-Aug-33 16-Nov-33 129 A0811570 Completeness Review 110 17-Nov-33 26-Apr-34 130 A0811580 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 27-Apr-34 15-Mar-35 131 A0811590 SPK-RE approval MFR Routing 15 16-Mar-35 05-Apr-35 132 A0811600 DWSC W SPK-RE approval MFR signed 0 05-Apr-35 133 A0811610 SPD-RE review 198 06-Apr-35 22-Jan-36
134 A0811620 DWSC W Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370) 0 22-Jan-36 135 A0811630 PPMD Approval Letter Routing 15 23-Jan-36 12-Feb-36 136 A0811640 DWSC W PPMD approval letter signed 0 12-Feb-36 Construction Contracts 615 10-Nov-33 28-Apr-36
001 CON08010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 10-Nov-33 29-Nov-33 002 CON08020 RTA Package OC Review 30 30-Nov-33 12-Jan-34 003 CON08030 Contract Package Contingency 0 13-Jan-34 13-Jan-34 004 CON08040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 13-Jan-34 23-Feb-34 005 CON08050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 24-Feb-34 24-Feb-34 006 CON08060 DWSC W Contract RTA (CW400) 0 24-Feb-34
007 CON08070 DWSC W Advertise (CW420) 0 24-Feb-34
008 CON08080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 24-Feb-34 05-Apr-34 009 CON08090 DWSC W Bid Opening (CW430) 0 05-Apr-34
010 CON08100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 06-Apr-34 04-May-34 011 CON08110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 05-May-34 05-May-34 012 CON08210 DWSC W Contract Award (CC800) 0 05-May-34
013 CON08220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 05-May-34 02-Aug-34 014 CON08230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 03-Aug-34 07-Aug-34 015 CON08240 DWSC W Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 16-Nov-34 016 CON08250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 17-Nov-34 22-Nov-34 017 CON08260 DWSC W Construction Start (CC815) 0 24-Nov-34 018 CON08270 DWSC W Construction Contract 500 24-Nov-34 06-Apr-36 019 CON08500 DWSC W Construction Complete (CC820) 0 09-Dec-35 020 CON08510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 09-Dec-35 09-Dec-35 021 CON08520 DWSC W Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 06-Feb-36 022 CON08530 Process Final Payment 16 07-Feb-36 22-Feb-36 023 CON08540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 07-Feb-36 24-Mar-36 024 CON08550 DWSC W Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 06-Apr-36 025 CON08560 DWSC W Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 22-Feb-36 026 CON08570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 22 07-Apr-36 28-Apr-36 027 CON08580 DWSC W As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 28-Apr-36 028 CON08590 DWSC W O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 24-Mar-36 029 CON08600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 25-Mar-36 27-Mar-36 030 CON08610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 28-Mar-36 01-Apr-36 031 CON08620 DWSC W Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 28-Apr-36 South Cross Levee 3091 01-Oct-24 A 11-Dec-37
PED 3027 01-Oct-24 A 09-Sep-37
050 A0900000 South Cross Levee Await Funds 876 01-Oct-24 A 01-Feb-29 0501 A0900010 South Cross Levee Federal Funding Received 0 01-Feb-29 0502 A0900020 South Cross Levee AE Contracting 126 02-Feb-29 02-Aug-29 0503 A0900030 South Cross Levee AW Contract RTA 21 03-Aug-29 31-Aug-29 0504 A0900040 South Cross Levee Contract RTA (CW401) 0 31-Aug-29 0505 A0900050 South Cross Levee AE Contract Award (Contingency) 0 04-Sep-29 04-Sep-29 0506 A0900060 South Cross Levee AE Contract Award (CW801) 0 04-Sep-29 0507 A0900070 South Cross Levee Notice to Proceed 0 02-Nov-29 051 A0901010 Quality Control Plan 15 02-Nov-29 26-Nov-29 053 A0902020 PDT Formulates Plan 16 27-Nov-29 18-Dec-29 054 A0903010 Establish Design Flood Condition 95 19-Dec-29 06-May-30 055 A0903020 Design Water Surface Profiles 85 07-May-30 06-Sep-30 056 A0903030 South Cross Levee Initiate 30% Design 0 09-Sep-30 057 A0903040 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 09-Sep-30 15-Jan-31 058 A0903050 Prepare Draft HBOD, GDR and GBODR 199 16-Jan-31 30-Oct-31 059 A0903060 Contingency - 30% Design 0 31-Oct-31 31-Oct-31 060 A0903070 South Cross Levee 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 31-Oct-31 061 A0903080 30% Technical Reviews 73 31-Oct-31 18-Feb-32 062 A0904010 South Cross Levee Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 18-Dec-31 063 A0904020 VE Study 36 18-Dec-31 10-Feb-32
064 A0904030 South Cross Levee VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 10-Feb-32 065 A0905010 South Cross Levee Initiate 60% Design 0 19-Feb-32 066 A0905020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 110 19-Feb-32 26-Jul-32 067 A0905030 South Cross Levee Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 26-Jul-32 068 A0905040 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 27-Jul-32 27-Aug-32 069 A0905050 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 30-Aug-32 13-Sep-32 070 A0905060 Final analysis and revisions 10 14-Sep-32 27-Sep-32 071 A0905070 South Cross Levee H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220) 0 27-Sep-32 072 A0905080 South Cross Levee Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225) 0 27-Sep-32 073 A0905090 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 28-Sep-32 02-Nov-32 074 A0905100 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 40 03-Nov-32 03-Jan-33 075 A0905110 Contingency - 60% Design 0 03-Nov-32 03-Nov-32 076 A0905120 South Cross Levee 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 03-Nov-32 077 A0906010 Risk Cadre Report 81 19-Feb-32 11-Jun-32
078 A0906020 South Cross Levee Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 11-Jun-32 079 A0907010 South Cross Levee Initiate 90% Design 0 03-Nov-32 080 A0907020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 88 03-Nov-32 14-Mar-33 081 A0907030 South Cross Levee Submit 90% Documents to ITR 0 14-Mar-33 082 A0907040 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 15-Mar-33 11-Apr-33 083 A0907050 90% Design Reviews 64 15-Mar-33 13-Jun-33
084 A0907060 Contingency - 90% Design 0 14-Jun-33 14-Jun-33 085 A0907070 South Cross Levee 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 14-Jun-33 086 A0908010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 14-Jun-33 10-Aug-33 087 A0908020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 11-Aug-33 06-Oct-33 088 A0908030 Final Tech Reviews 40 07-Oct-33 06-Dec-33
091 A0908060 Design Team Responses, Revisions and Backcheck 20 07-Dec-33 05-Jan-34 092 A0908070 South Cross Levee Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 05-Jan-34 093 A0908080 Final Design DQC 10 06-Jan-34 20-Jan-34
094 A0909010 Final Design P&S Review 21 23-Jan-34 21-Feb-34 095 A0909020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 22-Feb-34 22-Feb-34 096 A0909030 South Cross Levee Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 22-Feb-34 097 A0909040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 22-Feb-34 04-Apr-34 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 DWSC W MitigationTake Letter Contingency (CONT)
DWSC W Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
DWSC W Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
LEERDs Aquisition
DWSC W Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
DWSC W Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) DWSC W Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) DWSC W Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) LERRDs Credit Request
Completeness Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE approval MFR Routing
DWSC W SPK-RE approval MFR signed
SPD-RE review
DWSC W Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370)
PPMD Approval Letter Routing
DWSC W PPMD approval letter signed
28-Apr-36, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
DWSC W Contract RTA (CW400)
DWSC W Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
DWSC W Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
DWSC W Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval DWSC W Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440)
Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
DWSC W Construction Start (CC815)
DWSC W Construction Contract
DWSC W Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
DWSC W Construction Physically complete (CC840)
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
DWSC W Construction Contract Complete (CC830)
DWSC W Contractor Final Payment (CC880)
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
DWSC W As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885)
DWSC W O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298)
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
DWSC W Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 11-Dec-37, South Cross Levee
09-Sep-37, PED
South Cross Levee Await Funds
South Cross Levee Federal Funding Received
South Cross Levee AE Contracting
South Cross Levee AW Contract RTA
South Cross Levee Contract RTA (CW401)
South Cross Levee AE Contract Award (Contingency)
South Cross Levee AE Contract Award (CW801)
South Cross Levee Notice to Proceed
Quality Control Plan
PDT Formulates Plan
Establish Design Flood Condition
Design Water Surface Profiles
South Cross Levee Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Prepare Draft HBOD, GDR and GBODR
Contingency - 30% Design
South Cross Levee 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235)
30% Technical Reviews
South Cross Levee Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
South Cross Levee VE/VM Complete (CW290)
South Cross Levee Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
South Cross Levee Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
Final analysis and revisions
South Cross Levee H&H BOD Complete (SPK-CW-220)
South Cross Levee Geotech BOD Complete (SPK-CW-225)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
South Cross Levee 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265)
Risk Cadre Report
South Cross Levee Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal
South Cross Levee Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
South Cross Levee Submit 90% Documents to ITR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Design Reviews
Contingency - 90% Design
South Cross Levee 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295)
Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Design Team Responses, Revisions and Backcheck
South Cross Levee Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
South Cross Levee Final Design P&S Complete (CW330)
Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 12 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 325
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
098 A0910010 Update Environmental Docs 134 19-Feb-32 27-Aug-32 099 A0910020 USACE OC Review 30 30-Aug-32 12-Oct-32
100 A0910030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 158 13-Oct-32 31-May-33 101 A0910040 South Cross Levee Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 31-May-33 102 A0910050 NFS Briefing 1 01-Jun-33 01-Jun-33
103 A0910060 South Cross Levee NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 01-Jun-33 104 A0910070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 02-Jun-33 29-Jul-33 105 A0910080 South Cross Levee USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 29-Jul-33 106 A0911010 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 14-Jun-33 20-Jul-33 1061 A0911015 South Cross Levee Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 21-Jul-33 21-Jul-33 107 A0911020 South Cross Levee SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 21-Jul-33 1071 A0911025 South Cross Levee NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 21-Jul-33 21-Jul-33 108 A0911030 South Cross Levee NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 21-Jul-33 109 A0911040 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 21-Jul-33 21-Feb-35 110 A0911050 South Cross Levee NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 21-Jul-33 111 A0911060 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 21-Jul-33 21-Feb-35 112 A0911070 South Cross Levee NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 21-Feb-35 113 A0911080 Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 22-Feb-35 09-May-35 114 A0911100 South Cross Levee USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 10-May-35 10-May-35 115 A0911110 South Cross Levee USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 10-May-35 1151 A0911112 South Cross Levee BCOES Certification 15 10-May-35 31-May-35 1152 A0911113 South Cross Levee BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 01-Jun-35 01-Jun-35 1153 A0911114 South Cross Levee BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 01-Jun-35 116 A0911300 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 10-May-35 17-Dec-35 117 A0911310 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 18-Dec-35 31-Oct-36 118 A0911320 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 03-Nov-36 24-Nov-36 119 A0911330 South Cross Levee SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 24-Nov-36 120 A0911340 SPD-RE Review 198 25-Nov-36 09-Sep-37
121 A0911350 South Cross Levee LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 09-Sep-37 1211 A0911495 South Cross Levee MitigationTake Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 21-Jul-33 21-Jul-33 122 A0911500 South Cross Levee Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 21-Jul-33 123 A0911510 South Cross Levee Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 21-Jul-33 124 A0911520 LEERDs Aquisition 396 21-Jul-33 21-Feb-35
125 A0911530 South Cross Levee Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 22-Feb-35 09-May-35 1251 A0911535 South Cross Levee Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 09-May-35 126 A0911540 South Cross Levee Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 10-May-35 10-May-35 127 A0911550 South Cross Levee Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 10-May-35 128 A0911560 LERRDs Credit Request 66 22-Feb-35 24-May-35 130 A0911570 Completeness Review 110 25-May-35 01-Nov-35 131 A0911580 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 02-Nov-35 18-Sep-36 132 A0911590 SPK-RE approval MFR Routing 15 19-Sep-36 09-Oct-36 133 A0911600 South Cross Levee SPK-RE approval MFR signed 0 09-Oct-36 134 A0911610 SPD-RE review 198 10-Oct-36 28-Jul-37
135 A0911620 South Cross Levee Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370) 0 28-Jul-37 136 A0911630 PPMD Approval Letter Routing 15 29-Jul-37 18-Aug-37 137 A0911640 South Cross Levee PPMD approval letter signed 0 18-Aug-37 Construction Contracts 648 10-May-35 11-Dec-37
001 CON09010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 10-May-35 25-May-35 002 CON09020 RTA Package OC Review 30 29-May-35 11-Jul-35 003 CON09030 Contract Package Contingency 0 12-Jul-35 12-Jul-35 004 CON09040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 12-Jul-35 20-Aug-35 005 CON09050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 21-Aug-35 21-Aug-35 006 CON09060 South Cross Levee Contract RTA (CW400) 0 21-Aug-35 007 CON09070 South Cross Levee Advertise (CW420) 0 21-Aug-35 008 CON09080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 21-Aug-35 01-Oct-35 009 CON09090 South Cross Levee Bid Opening (CW430) 0 01-Oct-35 010 CON09100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 02-Oct-35 31-Oct-35 011 CON09110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 01-Nov-35 01-Nov-35 012 CON09210 South Cross Levee Contract Award (CC800) 0 01-Nov-35 013 CON09220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 01-Nov-35 29-Jan-36 014 CON09230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 30-Jan-36 03-Feb-36 015 CON09240 South Cross Levee Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 14-May-36 016 CON09250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 15-May-36 20-May-36 017 CON09260 South Cross Levee Construction Start (CC815) 0 22-May-36 018 CON09270 South Cross Levee Construction Contract 547 22-May-36 19-Nov-37 019 CON09500 South Cross Levee Construction Complete (CC820) 0 23-Jul-37 020 CON09510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 23-Jul-37 23-Jul-37 021 CON09520 South Cross Levee Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 20-Sep-37 022 CON09530 Process Final Payment 16 21-Sep-37 06-Oct-37 023 CON09540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 21-Sep-37 06-Nov-37 024 CON09550 South Cross Levee Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 19-Nov-37 025 CON09560 South Cross Levee Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 06-Oct-37 026 CON09570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 22 20-Nov-37 11-Dec-37 027 CON09580 South Cross Levee As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 11-Dec-37 028 CON09590 South Cross Levee O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 06-Nov-37 029 CON09600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 07-Nov-37 09-Nov-37 030 CON09610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 10-Nov-37 14-Nov-37 031 CON09620 South Cross Levee Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 11-Dec-37 Training Dike 2353 01-Oct-24 A 29-Dec-34
PED 2353 01-Oct-24 A 29-Dec-34
050 A0600000 Sac Bypass Training Dike Await Funds 376 01-Oct-24 A 02-Feb-27 051 A0600001 Sac Bypass Training Dike Federal Funding Received 0 02-Feb-27 051 A0601010 Quality Control Plan 15 02-Sep-27 23-Sep-27 0511 A0600010 Sac Bypass Training Dike AE Contracting 126 03-Feb-27 03-Aug-27 0512 A0600020 Sac Bypass Training Dike AW Contract RTA 21 04-Aug-27 01-Sep-27 0513 A0600030 Sac Bypass Training Dike AW Contract RTA (CW401) 0 01-Sep-27 0514 A0600040 Sac Bypass Training Dike AE Contract Award (Contingency) 0 02-Sep-27 02-Sep-27 0515 A0600060 Sac Bypass Training Dike AE Contract Award (CW801) 0 02-Sep-27 0516 A0600070 Sac Bypass Training Dike Notice to Proceed 0 02-Sep-27 053 A0602020 PDT Formulates Plan 16 24-Sep-27 18-Oct-27 054 A0603030 Establish Design Flood Condition 90 19-Oct-27 29-Feb-28 055 A0603040 Deliver Design Water Surface Profiles 5 01-Mar-28 07-Mar-28 056 A0603050 Develop 2D Model 120 08-Mar-28 25-Aug-28
057 A0603060 Sac Bypass Training Dike Initiate 30% Design 0 28-Aug-28 058 A0603070 30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR 88 28-Aug-28 04-Jan-29 059 A0603080 Contingency - 30% Design 0 05-Jan-29 05-Jan-29 060 A0603090 Sac Bypass Training Dike 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 0 05-Jan-29 061 A0603100 30% Design Review 32 05-Jan-29 21-Feb-29
062 A0603110 Sac Bypass Training Dike 30% Revise Design Documents 0 21-Feb-29 063 A0603120 30% Design ATR Review 41 22-Feb-29 19-Apr-29 064 A0604010 Sac Bypass Training Dike Start VE/VM (CW285) 0 22-Feb-29 065 A0604020 VE Study 36 22-Feb-29 12-Apr-29
066 A0604030 Sac Bypass Training Dike VE/VM Complete (CW290) 0 12-Apr-29 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
South Cross Levee Receive Project Bological Opinion
NFS Briefing
South Cross Levee NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA
FONSI Reviews and Signatures
South Cross Levee USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
South Cross Levee Take Letter Contingency (CONT)
South Cross Levee SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350)
South Cross Levee NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) South Cross Levee NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)
NFS LERRDs Aquisition
South Cross Levee NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) NFS Utilities Relocation
South Cross Levee NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) Certified Real Estate Pkg
South Cross Levee USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) South Cross Levee USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) South Cross Levee BCOES Certification
South Cross Levee BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT)
South Cross Levee BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
South Cross Levee SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
South Cross Levee LERRD Credits Certified
South Cross Levee MitigationTake Letter Contingency (CONT) South Cross Levee Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) South Cross Levee Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) LEERDs Aquisition
South Cross Levee Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg South Cross Levee Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) South Cross Levee Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) South Cross Levee Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) LERRDs Credit Request
Completeness Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE approval MFR Routing
South Cross Levee SPK-RE approval MFR signed
SPD-RE review
South Cross Levee Mitigation SPP-RE approval M
PPMD Approval Letter Routing
South Cross Levee PPMD approval letter signed
11-Dec-37, Construction Contrac
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
South Cross Levee Contract RTA (CW400)
South Cross Levee Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
South Cross Levee Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
South Cross Levee Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval South Cross Levee Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
South Cross Levee Construction Start (CC815)
South Cross Levee Construction Co
South Cross Levee Construction Complete (CC82
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
South Cross Levee Construction Physically
Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
South Cross Levee Construction Co
South Cross Levee Contractor Final Paym
Contractor Finish As-Built Drawin
South Cross Levee As-Built Draw
South Cross Levee O&M Manual Com
Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Docu
Notice of Project Completion OC Rev
South Cross Levee Notice of Proje
29-Dec-34, Training Dike
29-Dec-34, PED
Sac Bypass Training Dike Await Funds
Sac Bypass Training Dike Federal Funding Received
Quality Control Plan
Sac Bypass Training Dike AE Contracting
Sac Bypass Training Dike AW Contract RTA
Sac Bypass Training Dike AW Contract RTA (CW401)
Sac Bypass Training Dike AE Contract Award (Contingency) Sac Bypass Training Dike AE Contract Award (CW801)
Sac Bypass Training Dike Notice to Proceed
PDT Formulates Plan
Establish Design Flood Condition
Deliver Design Water Surface Profiles
Develop 2D Model
Sac Bypass Training Dike Initiate 30% Design
30% Plans/Outline Specs/DDR
Contingency - 30% Design
Sac Bypass Training Dike 30% Design Complete (SPK-CW-235) 30% Design Review
Sac Bypass Training Dike 30% Revise Design Documents
30% Design ATR Review
Sac Bypass Training Dike Start VE/VM (CW285)
VE Study
Sac Bypass Training Dike VE/VM Complete (CW290)
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 13 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 326
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
067 A0605010 Sac Bypass Training Dike Initiate 60% Design 0 20-Apr-29 068 A0605020 60% Plans/Specs/DDR 90 20-Apr-29 28-Aug-29 069 A0605030 Sac Bypass Training Dike Submit 60% Documents to ITR 0 28-Aug-29 070 A0605040 60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) 24 29-Aug-29 02-Oct-29 071 A0605050 District Quality Control Review (DQC) 10 03-Oct-29 17-Oct-29 072 A0605060 Final analysis and revisions 10 18-Oct-29 31-Oct-29 073 A0605070 Sac Bypass Training Dike HBOD Complete (SPK-CW-220) 0 31-Oct-29 074 A0605080 Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions 25 01-Nov-29 07-Dec-29 075 A0605090 60% MCACES Cost Estimates 50 10-Dec-29 21-Feb-30 076 A0605100 Contingency - 60% Design 0 10-Dec-29 10-Dec-29 077 A0605110 Sac Bypass Training Dike 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) 0 10-Dec-29 078 A0606010 Risk Cadre Report 81 20-Apr-29 15-Aug-29
079 A0606020 Sac Bypass Training Dike Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal 0 15-Aug-29 080 A0607010 Sac Bypass Training Dike Initiate 90% Design 0 22-Feb-30 081 A0607020 90% Plans & Specs/DDR 88 22-Feb-30 27-Jun-30 082 A0607030 90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 20 28-Jun-30 26-Jul-30 083 A0607040 90% Design Review 64 28-Jun-30 27-Sep-30
084 A0607050 Contingency - 90% Design 0 30-Sep-30 30-Sep-30 085 A0607060 Sac Bypass Training Dike 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) 0 30-Sep-30 086 A0608010 Final Plans & Specs/DDR 40 30-Sep-30 26-Nov-30 087 A0608020 Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES 40 27-Nov-30 27-Jan-31 088 A0608030 Final Tech Reviews 40 28-Jan-31 25-Mar-31
091 A0608060 Final NEPA Review OC & ATR 90 26-Mar-31 01-Aug-31 092 A0608070 Sac Bypass Training Dike Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) 0 01-Aug-31 093 A0608080 Final Design DQC 10 04-Aug-31 15-Aug-31
094 A0609010 Final Design P&S Review 21 18-Aug-31 16-Sep-31 095 A0609020 Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete 0 17-Sep-31 17-Sep-31 096 A0609030 Sac Bypass Training Dike Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) 0 17-Sep-31 097 A0609040 Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE 30 17-Sep-31 29-Oct-31 098 A0610010 Update Environmental Docs 135 20-Apr-29 01-Nov-29 099 A0610020 USACE OC Review 30 02-Nov-29 17-Dec-29
100 A0610030 Review and Revise Environmental Docs 157 18-Dec-29 02-Aug-30 101 A0610040 Sac Bypass Training Dike Receive Project Bological Opinion 0 02-Aug-30 102 A0610050 NFS Briefing 1 05-Aug-30 05-Aug-30
103 A0610060 Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA 0 05-Aug-30 104 A0610070 FONSI Reviews and Signatures 40 06-Aug-30 01-Oct-30 105 A0610080 Sac Bypass Training Dike USACE FONSI (CW200) 0 01-Oct-30 106 A0611100 SPK RE Prepares Take Letter 25 02-Oct-30 06-Nov-30 1061 A0611105 Sac Bypass Training Dike Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 07-Nov-30 07-Nov-30 107 A0611110 Sac Bypass Training Dike SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 07-Nov-30 1071 A0611115 Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) 0 07-Nov-30 07-Nov-30 108 A0611120 Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) 0 07-Nov-30 109 A0611130 NFS LERRDs Aquisition 396 07-Nov-30 08-Jun-32 110 A0611140 Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) 0 07-Nov-30 111 A0611150 NFS Utilities Relocation 396 07-Nov-30 08-Jun-32 112 A0611160 Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) 0 08-Jun-32 113 A0611170 Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 09-Jun-32 26-Aug-32 1131 A0611175 Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 26-Aug-32 114 A0611180 Sac Bypass Training Dike USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 27-Aug-32 27-Aug-32 115 A0611190 Sac Bypass Training Dike USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 27-Aug-32 1151 A0611192 Sac Bypass Training Dike BCOES Certification 15 27-Aug-32 17-Sep-32 1152 A0611193 Sac Bypass Training Dike BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) 0 20-Sep-32 20-Sep-32 1153 A0611194 Sac Bypass Training Dike BCOES Complete (CW320) 0 20-Sep-32 116 A0611300 LERRDs Credit Request/Review 151 27-Aug-32 06-Apr-33 117 A0611310 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 07-Apr-33 23-Feb-34 118 A0611320 SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature 15 24-Feb-34 16-Mar-34 119 A0611330 Sac Bypass Training Dike SPK-RE Approval MFR signed 0 16-Mar-34 120 A0611340 SPD-RE Review 198 17-Mar-34 29-Dec-34
121 A0611350 Sac Bypass Training Dike LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) 0 29-Dec-34 1211 A0611495 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation Take Letter Contingency (CONT) 0 07-Nov-30 07-Nov-30 122 A0611500 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) 0 07-Nov-30 123 A0611510 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340)0 07-Nov-30 124 A0611520 LEERDs Aquisition 396 07-Nov-30 08-Jun-32
125 A0611530 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg 55 09-Jun-32 26-Aug-32 1251 A0611535 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) 0 26-Aug-32 126 A0611540 LERRDs Credit Request 66 09-Jun-32 13-Sep-32 127 A0611550 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) 0 27-Aug-32 27-Aug-32 128 A0611560 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) 0 27-Aug-32 130 A0611570 Completeness Review 110 14-Sep-32 23-Feb-33 131 A0611580 Appraisal and Cost Reviews 220 24-Feb-33 10-Jan-34 132 A0611590 SPK-RE approval MFR Routing 15 11-Jan-34 01-Feb-34 133 A0611600 Sac Bypass Training Dike SPK-RE approval MFR signed 0 01-Feb-34 134 A0611610 SPD-RE review 198 02-Feb-34 15-Nov-34
135 A0611620 Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370) 0 15-Nov-34 136 A0611630 PPMD Approval Letter Routing 15 16-Nov-34 07-Dec-34 137 A0611640 Sac Bypass Training Dike PPMD approval letter signed 0 07-Dec-34 Construction Contracts 380 27-Aug-32 08-Mar-34
001 CON06010 PDT Assembles Contract Package 12 27-Aug-32 14-Sep-32 002 CON06020 RTA Package OC Review 30 15-Sep-32 27-Oct-32 003 CON06030 Contract Package Contingency 0 28-Oct-32 28-Oct-32 004 CON06040 Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package 28 28-Oct-32 08-Dec-32 005 CON06050 Contingency for Construction Contract RTA 0 09-Dec-32 09-Dec-32 006 CON06060 Sac Bypass Training Dike Contract RTA (CW400) 0 09-Dec-32 007 CON06070 Sac Bypass Training Dike Advertise (CW420) 0 09-Dec-32 008 CON06080 Contract Advertisement Period 29 09-Dec-32 21-Jan-33 009 CON06090 Sac Bypass Training Dike Bid Opening (CW430) 0 21-Jan-33 010 CON06100 Prepare Contract Documents 21 24-Jan-33 22-Feb-33 011 CON06110 Contingency for Construction Contract Award 0 23-Feb-33 23-Feb-33 012 CON06210 Sac Bypass Training Dike Contract Award (CC800) 0 23-Feb-33 013 CON06220 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process 90 23-Feb-33 23-May-33 014 CON06230 USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval 5 24-May-33 28-May-33 015 CON06240 Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) 0 29-May-33 016 CON06250 Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB) 6 30-May-33 04-Jun-33 017 CON06260 Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Start (CC815) 0 06-Jun-33 018 CON06270 Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Contract 260 06-Jun-33 20-Feb-34 019 CON06500 Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Complete (CC820) 0 24-Oct-33 020 CON06510 Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items) 0 24-Oct-33 24-Oct-33 021 CON06520 Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Physically complete (CC840) 0 22-Dec-33 022 CON06530 Process Final Payment 16 23-Dec-33 07-Jan-34 023 CON06540 Develop OMRR&R Manual 47 23-Dec-33 07-Feb-34 024 CON06550 Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Contract Complete (CC830) 0 20-Feb-34 025 CON06560 Sac Bypass Training Dike Contractor Final Payment (CC880) 0 07-Jan-34 026 CON06570 Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings 16 21-Feb-34 08-Mar-34 027 CON06580 Sac Bypass Training Dike As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) 0 08-Mar-34 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 Sac Bypass Training Dike Initiate 60% Design
60% Plans/Specs/DDR
Sac Bypass Training Dike Submit 60% Documents to ITR
60% Outline Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) District Quality Control Review (DQC)
Final analysis and revisions
Sac Bypass Training Dike HBOD Complete (SPK-CW-220)
Respond to Draft Review Comments/Comment Revisions
60% MCACES Cost Estimates
Contingency - 60% Design
Sac Bypass Training Dike 60% Design Complete (SPK-CW-265) Risk Cadre Report
Sac Bypass Training Dike Risk Cadre Final Report Submittal Sac Bypass Training Dike Initiate 90% Design
90% Plans & Specs/DDR
90% MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
90% Design Review
Contingency - 90% Design
Sac Bypass Training Dike 90% Design Complete (SPK-CW-295) Final Plans & Specs/DDR
Final MCACES Cost Estimates: CES
Final Tech Reviews
Final NEPA Review OC & ATR
Sac Bypass Training Dike Draft Plans & Specs Complete [100% Submittal] (CW310) Final Design DQC
Final Design P&S Review
Contingency for Final Design P&S Complete
Sac Bypass Training Dike Final Design P&S Complete (CW330) Cost Engineering Prepares Final IGE
Update Environmental Docs
USACE OC Review
Review and Revise Environmental Docs
Sac Bypass Training Dike Receive Project Bological Opinion NFS Briefing
Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS's Board Approval of NEPA/CEQA FONSI Reviews and Signatures
Sac Bypass Training Dike USACE FONSI (CW200)
SPK RE Prepares Take Letter
Sac Bypass Training Dike Take Letter Contingency (CONT) Sac Bypass Training Dike SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS RE Acquisition Start Contingency (CONT) Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) NFS LERRDs Aquisition
Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Begins Utilities Relocation (CW380) NFS Utilities Relocation
Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Completes Utilities Relocation (CW390) Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg
Sac Bypass Training Dike NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) Sac Bypass Training Dike USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) Sac Bypass Training Dike USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) Sac Bypass Training Dike BCOES Certification
Sac Bypass Training Dike BCOES Complete Contingency (CONT) Sac Bypass Training Dike BCOES Complete (CW320)
LERRDs Credit Request/Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE Approval MFR Routed for Signature
Sac Bypass Training Dike SPK-RE Approval MFR signed
SPD-RE Review
Sac Bypass Training Dike LERRD Credits Certified (CW370) Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation Take Letter Contingency (CONT) Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation SPK RE Take Letter to NFS (CW350) Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation NFS Begins LERRDs Aquisition (CW340) LEERDs Aquisition
Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation NFS Certified Real Estate Pkg (SPD-CW-001) LERRDs Credit Request
Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation USACE RE Certification Contingency (CONT) Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation USACE RE Certified Real Estate MFR to PM (CW360) Completeness Review
Appraisal and Cost Reviews
SPK-RE approval MFR Routing
Sac Bypass Training Dike SPK-RE approval MFR signed
SPD-RE review
Sac Bypass Training Dike Mitigation SPP-RE approval MFR (CW370) PPMD Approval Letter Routing
Sac Bypass Training Dike PPMD approval letter signed
08-Mar-34, Construction Contracts
PDT Assembles Contract Package
RTA Package OC Review
Contract Package Contingency
Contracting Prepares Solicitation Package
Contingency for Construction Contract RTA
Sac Bypass Training Dike Contract RTA (CW400)
Sac Bypass Training Dike Advertise (CW420)
Contract Advertisement Period
Sac Bypass Training Dike Bid Opening (CW430)
Prepare Contract Documents
Contingency for Construction Contract Award
Sac Bypass Training Dike Contract Award (CC800)
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process
USACE - Contractor Submittal Process final review/approval Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Contract NTP Issued (CW440) Construction Contractor Mobilization (MOB)
Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Start (CC815)
Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Contract
Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Complete (CC820)
Contingency for Completion (Incl Closeout Items)
Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Physically complete (CC840) Process Final Payment
Develop OMRR&R Manual
Sac Bypass Training Dike Construction Contract Complete (CC830) Sac Bypass Training Dike Contractor Final Payment (CC880) Contractor Finish As-Built Drawings
Sac Bypass Training Dike As-Built Drawings Complete (CC885) Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 14 of 15 ends

(c) Primavera Systems, Inc. 327
Order (UT1) Activity ID Activity Name Remaining
Duration
Start Finish
028 CON06590 Sac Bypass Training Dike O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) 0 07-Feb-34 029 CON06600 Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents 3 08-Feb-34 10-Feb-34 030 CON06610 Notice of Project Completion OC Review 5 11-Feb-34 15-Feb-34 031 CON06620 Sac Bypass Training Dike Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 0 08-Mar-34 Project Closeout 210 28-Apr-37 02-Mar-38
No Category (CNTG) 210 28-Apr-37 02-Mar-38
001 END601 Financial Closeout Start 0 28-Apr-37
002 END610 Financial Closeout 120 28-Apr-37 19-Oct-37
003 END620 Closeout Letter Prepared, Review, Approved, Signed 90 20-Oct-37 02-Mar-38 004 END630 Closeout Letter provided to NFS 0 02-Mar-38
005 END640 West Sacramento Fiscally Complete (CW470) 0 02-Mar-38 006 END650 Provide Final Plan Sets and Drawings to NFS 40 14-Dec-37 10-Feb-38 007 END660 West Sacramento Project Phyically Complete (CW450) 0 02-Mar-38 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 FY2031 FY2032 FY2033 FY2034 FY2035 FY2036 FY2037 FY2038 Sac Bypass Training Dike O&M Manual Complete (SPK-CW-298) Submit O&M Manual/Turnover Documents
Notice of Project Completion OC Review
Sac Bypass Training Dike Notice of Project Completion/Assumption of OMRR&R (CW480) 02-Mar-38, Project Clos
02-Mar-38, No Categor
Financial Closeout Start
Financial Closeout
Closeout Letter Prepared
Closeout Letter provided
West Sacramento Fisca
Provide Final Plan Sets an
West Sacramento Proje
Remaining Level of Effort
Actual Level of Effort
Actual Work
Remaining Work
Critical Remaining Work
Milestone

Page 15 of 15 ends

South Pacific Division
Sacramento District
This information is distributed solely for the purpose of pre-dissemination review under applicable information quality guidelines. It has not been formally disseminated by USACE. It does not represent and should not be construed to represent any agency determination or policy.

West Sacramento Project
(Levee System ID #5205000903)
Implementation Review Plan
MSC Approval Date:

Expiration Date: 3-years after MSC Approval
Last Revision Date:

APPROVAL
RECOMMENDED BY:

Rick Poeppelman, P.E.

Chief, Engineering Division
USACE, Sacramento District
ENDORSED BY:

David E. Carlson, P.E
Chief, Eastern Division
USACE, Risk Management Center
APPROVED BY:

John D Moreno, SES
Programs Director
USACE, South Pacific Division
329
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
Table of Contents
...............................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................1

1.1 Purpose ..........................................................................................................................................1

1.2 Key References..............................................................................................................................1

1.3 Review Management Organization................................................................................................2 ...............................................................................................................................................................3 Project Description.............................................................................................................................................3

2.1 Project Description .........................................................................................................................3

2.2 Project Sponsor..............................................................................................................................8

2.3 Environmental Documentation .......................................................................................................9 ...............................................................................................................................................................9 Risk Assessment During Design .......................................................................................................................9 .............................................................................................................................................................10 Project Delivery Team Reviews.......................................................................................................................10 .............................................................................................................................................................10 District Quality Control .....................................................................................................................................10

5.1 Requirements...............................................................................................................................10

5.2 Products to Undergo DQC ...........................................................................................................10

5.3 Schedule and Estimated Cost of DQC.........................................................................................11 .............................................................................................................................................................11 Agency Technical Review................................................................................................................................11

6.1 Requirements...............................................................................................................................11

6.2 Products to Undergo ATR ............................................................................................................11

6.3 Required Team Expertise and Requirements..............................................................................12

6.4 Statement of Technical Review Report........................................................................................14

6.5 Schedule and Estimated Cost of ATR .........................................................................................14 .............................................................................................................................................................14 BCOES Review ...............................................................................................................................................14

7.1 Requirements...............................................................................................................................14 .............................................................................................................................................................14 Safety Assurance Review................................................................................................................................14

8.1 Decision on SAR ..........................................................................................................................14

8.2 Products to Undergo SAR............................................................................................................15 330
Prepared by:

8.3 Required SAR Panel Expertise ...................................................................................................15

8.4 .........................................................................15 .............................................................................................................................................................16 Review Plan Approval and Updates................................................................................................................16 ...........................................................................................................................................................16 Engineering Models.........................................................................................................................................16 ...........................................................................................................................................................17 Review Plan Points of Contact........................................................................................................................17 ......................................................................................................................................................18 Team Rosters (CUI) ........................................................................................................................................18 ......................................................................................................................................................27 Project Risk Information (CUI) ........................................................................................................................27

2.1 Project Risks ........................................................................................................................................27

2.2 Construction Risks ...............................................................................................................................27

2.3 Vegetation and Encroachments...........................................................................................................28

2.3.1 Existing Conditions ..............................................................................................................................28

2.3.2 Managing Vegetation and Encroachments..........................................................................................29 ......................................................................................................................................................31 Preliminary PED Project Milestones ...............................................................................................................31 ......................................................................................................................................................34 Review Plan Revisions....................................................................................................................................34 331
332
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
1 Introduction

1.1 Purpose
This Review Plan (RP) for West Sacramento Project (P2#456851), will help ensure a quality-engineering project is developed by the Corps of Engineers in accordance with Engineer Regulation (ER) 1165-2- -Do-Check-Act delivery business
process as prescribed by Engineer Regulation (ER) 5-1-11 and ER 1165-2-217. As part of the Project Management Plan this RP establishes an accountable, comprehensive, life-cycle review strategy for Civil Works products and lays out a value-added process and describes the scope of review for the current phase of work. The ER outlines general levels of review: District Quality Control/ District Quality Assurance (DQC/DQA), Agency Technical Review (ATR), Biddability, Constructability, Operability, Environmental, and Sustainability (BCOES) Review, Independent External Peer Review (IEPR), Safety Assurance Review (SAR), and Policy and Legal Compliance Review. This RP will be provided to Project Delivery Team (PDT), DQC/DQA Team, ATR Team, BCOES Team, and IEPR/SAR Team. The District Chief of Engineering has assessed that the life safety risk of this project is significant; therefore, a SAR will be required, see Paragraph 8.1.

Upon completion of the design risk assessment, the District Chief of Engineering will reassess the determination of SAR requirement. A catastrophic failure of the levee system around West Sacramento would freeways (I-80 and U.S. Highway 50), an important rail link from the San Francisco Bay area to the rest of the country, and cause significant residential, commercial, and industrial property damage with an estimated loss of over $6 billion.

1.2 Key References
ER 5-1-11, USACE Business Process, 21 Jul 2019
ER 1165-2-217, Civil Works Review Policy, 01 May 2021
ECB 2019-15, Interim Approach for Risk-Informed Designs for Dam and Levee Projects, 08 October 2019 ER 1110-1-12, Quality Management, 31 Mar 2011
ECB 2015-18 Technical Lead for E&C Deliverables, 19 October 2015 ER 415-1-11, Biddability, Constructability, Operability, Environmental and Sustainability (BCOES) Reviews, 1 January 2013
EM 1110-2-1913 Design, Construction, and Evaluation of Levees, 30 April 2000 Draft EC 1165-2-218, USACE Levee Safety Program
ER 1110-1-12, Engineering and Design Quality Management, 31 March 2011 ER 1110-1-8159, Engineering and Design, DrCheckssm, 10 May 2011 333
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
2 EP 1110-2-18, Guidelines for Landscape Planting and Vegetation Management at Levees, Floodwalls, Embankment Dams, And Appurtenant Structures
ER 1110-1-8159, Engineering and Design, DrCheckssm, 10 May 2011 ER 1110-2-1150, Engineering and Design for Civil Works Projects, 31 August 1999 RMC-AD-2019-03 Standard Operating Procedure for Type II Independent External Peer Reviews (Safety Assurance Reviews), 28 January 2019
Sacramento District Quality Management Plan (QMP.docx)
-02, Clarification of Policies on
Review Plan Approvals, Type II IEPR Decision, and Regional Programmatic Value Engineering Studies, 13 April 2018.

West Sacramento Project, WRDA 2016 PED/CON Project Management Plan West Sacramento Project, Quality Assurance Plan, 12 June 2020 West Sacramento Project, General Reevaluation Report, December 2015 WIIN Act S.612 Public Law No. 114-322, 16 December 2016 SUBJECT: Policy for Development and Implementation of System-Wide Improvement Frameworks ss for Requesting a Variance from Vegetation Standards for Levees and Floodwalls, Enclosure 3- Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense, February 2012.

CVFPB, West Sacrament Area Flood Control Agency Letter of Intent to Develop and Implement a SystemWide Improvement Framework Plan for the West Sacramento Levee System. Central Valley Flood Protection Board, California Natural Resources Agency, Sacramento, California, November 2017.

Approved by USACE April 18, 2018.

1.3 Review Management Organization
The USACE Risk Management Center (RMC) is the Review Management Organization (RMO) for this project.

This RP will be updated for additional project phases and for the construction phase. 334
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
3 Project Description

2.1 Project Description
The estimated cost for the project ranges from $1.2 billion to $ 1.4 billion at the FY2020 price level with an estimated duration of 9 to 10 years. The estimated population at risk is 48,000; this estimate will be updated as refinements are made during future risk assessment efforts. More information on the project and risk associated with the project is provided in Attachment 2. The overall status of the project is 5%.

2.1.1 Project Authority
The West Sacramento Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2016.

WRDA 2016 authorized the construction of levee improvements for levee system that surround the City of West Sacramento and the Southport Setback reach and the east bank of the Yolo Bypass Levee.

2.1.2 Location and Description
The West Sacramento Project is in the city of West Sacramento in eastern Yolo County adjacent to the confluence of the American and Sacramento Rivers. The City of West Sacramento comprising 13,000 acres of mixed-use land and an estimated population of 48,000 residents. The City of West Sacramento is located natural floodplain of the Sacramento River, which bounds the city along the north and east.

The Project area
geographically consists of two sub-basins north and south. The Northern Sub-basin encompasses approximately 6,100 acres, is bounded by the Port North area and the Deep-Water Shipping Channel (DWSC) to the south, the Sacramento River North Levee to the north and east, the Sacramento Bypass Levee to the north, and the Yolo Bypass Levee to the west. The right bank of the Sacramento River extends for approximately 5.5 miles of the northern and eastern sides of the basin. The Southern Sub-Basin encompasses approximately 6,900 acres and varies from El. 18.0 feet (NAVD88) to El. 8.0 feet (NAVD88). The area is bounded by the Port South Levee and the DWSC to the north, the Sacramento River South Levee to the east, the South Cross Levee to the south, and the DWSC East Levee to the west. The right bank of the Sacramento River extends for approximately 6.2 miles on the east side of the basin.

North Basin
Sacramento River North Levee - extends for approximately 30,700 feet along the Sacramento River right bank levee from the Sacramento Bypass south to the confluence of the Barge Canal and the Sacramento River. The general improvements for this reach include erosion protection on 14,300 feet of the reach andseepage improvements with slurry wall installation ranging from 30 feet to 110 feet in depth on 18,500 feetof the reach.

Yolo Bypass Levee - extends for approximately 19,750 feet along the Yolo Bypass levee left bank from theconfluence of the Sacramento Bypass and the Yolo Bypass south to the Navigation Levee (DWSC West). The general improvements for this reach include seepage improvements with slurry wall installation ranging from 40 feet to 100 feet in depth on 8,400 feet of the reach.
335
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
4 Stone Locks this area extends approximately 570 feet directly east of the inactivated Stone Locks. The improvements here will re-connect the Sacramento River North and South levees and close the connectionfrom the Sacramento River to the inactive lock and barge canal.

The general improvement for this reach is the construction of a new levee with embankment fill and sheet pile walls.

Sacramento Bypass Training Levee this levee extends approximately 3,000 feet southwest of the Sacramento Bypass levee into the Yolo Bypass. Erosion protection improvements will be placed on theentire reach.

South Basin
Sacramento River South Levee - extends approximately 29,300 feet along the Sacramento River right bank levee from the confluence of the Barge Canal and the Sacramento River south to the South Crosslevee. The general improvement for this reach includes construction of a setback levee with a slurry walland berm to address seepage concerns.

Port South Levee - extends for approximately 16,500 feet along the DWSC left bank levee from the BargeCanal west past the bend in the DWSC. The general improvement for this reach include 1,000 feet of seepage improvements with installation of a 70 foot slurry wall.

DWSC West Levee - extends for approximately 21.4 miles along the DWSC right bank levee from the bendin the DWSC at the intersection of Port North levee and Yolo Bypass levee south to Miners Slough. The general improvement for this reach includes installation of approximately 25,000 feet of slurry wall ranging from 50 feet to 85 feet in depth and 99,000 feet of erosion protection improvements.

DWSC East Levee - extends for approximately 17,000 feet along the DWSC left bank levee from the endof Port South levee south to South Cross levee. The general improvement for this reach includes 14,600feet of slurry wall ranging from 50 to 130 feet deep.

South Cross Levee - extends for approximately 6,400 feet from Jefferson Boulevard to the SacramentoRiver where it intersects the southern end of Sacramento River South levee. The general improvements for this reach include 1,400 feet of stability berm and 5,000 feet of leveeimprovements with relief wells to address seepage concerns.
336
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
5 Figure 1 West Sacramento Project Proposed Levee Improvements construction sequence in Table 1. The construction reaches have been prioritized based on a variety of factors, including the condition of the levee, the potential damages that would occur due to levee failure, and construction feasibility considerations, such as the availability of equipment at any given time. The duration of 337
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
6 construction activities are also shown in Table 1. The activities do not include the time needed for design, rightof- way, utility relocation, etc.

Table 1 Proposed levee improvement measures/tentative construction sequence.

Levee Reach
Length
of Reach
(feet)
Length of
Measure
(feet)
Improvement Measure
Construction
Duration
(year (s))
Yolo Bypass 19,749
3,900 Stability
Flatten Landside
Slope
2,500 1 Seepage/Stability
40 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
2,000 Seepage
100 Foot Deep
Slurry Wall
Sacramento
River North
Levee
30,700
15,000 Erosion
Protection Bank Protection
2 11,000 Seepage
30 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
1,500 Seepage
80 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
500
Seepage
45 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
5,500 Seepage
110 Foot Deep
Slurry Wall
Sacramento
Bypass
Training
Levee
3,000 3,000 Erosion
Protection Bank Protection 1
Stone Locks 570 550 Embankment Fill,
Sheet Pile Wall 2
DWSC East
Levee 17,171
1,500 Seepage
120 Foot Deep
Slurry Wall
7,100 3 Seepage
130 Foot Deep
Slurry Wall
6,000 Seepage
50 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
DWSC West
Levee 100,260
9,000 Seepage
85 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
17 7,000 Seepage
50 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
9,000 Seepage
75 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall
338
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
7 Table 1 Proposed levee improvement measures/tentative construction sequence.

Levee Reach
Length
of Reach
(feet)
Length of
Measure
(feet)
Improvement Measure
Construction
Duration
(year (s))
100,000 Erosion
Protection Bank Protection
South Cross
Levee 6,400 5,000 Seepage Relief Wells 2
Port South
Levee 16,262 1,000 Seepage
70 Foot Deep Slurry
Wall 1
*Sacramento
River South
Levee
30,000 30,000 Seepage/Erosion
80 Foot Deep
Slurry Wall 70
Foot Berm
Bank Protection
4 * Constructed in 2017-2019. WIK/IKC Packet is being reviewed by USACE Staff.

2.1.3 Implementation Strategy
The exact location and extents of the Project features (mitigation measures) will be refined and finalized during Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) through a variety of data collection and analysis activities. The construction may be revised from Table 1, as determined by these analyses and risk assessment results.

2.1.4 Implementation Status - Yolo Bypass Levee
Since SPK did not have a design team available, SPK requested the NFS to lead the design effort for YBEL to 100% and the NFS agreed and contracted an A-E for design firm for services to design the Yolo Bypass East Levees North and South. Using its qualification-based selection process, WSARCA selected MGE leads participated in the selection process as non-voting advisors. The SPK A-E SOW template was used for the work. The services provide consisted Civil, Hydrology/Hydraulics, Geotechnical, MCACES II Cost Estimates, Real Estate Mapping and Surveying. MGE has provided engineering services to the USACE under IDIQ contracts continuously since 2001.

The West Sacramento Project, General Reevaluation Report, December 2015 (GRR) documents the history of levee deficiencies and associated mitigation measures completed along the Yolo Bypass Levee project alignment. The GRR also presents results of geotechnical analyses and feasibility level geotechnical recommendations to address existing deficiencies for the Yolo Bypass Levee. GRR identified two levee segments within the Yolo Bypass Levee with levee performance deficiencies and presents selected crosssections that represent critical surface and subsurface soil conditions. The GRR recommends 4,500 linear feet of cutoff walls and 3,900 levee reshaping.

The mitigation measures began with the objectives outlined in the GRR for the Yolo Bypass Levee as described above. At the request of the PDT, MGE evaluated all segments of the Yolo Bypass Levee, reviewed subsurface soil conditions, past mitigation measures, and past performance. Based on these analysis and review, the Yolo Bypass Levee Final Geotechnical Basis of Design Report (GBODR) presents evaluations for the and recommendations for mitigation measures consisting of 7,850 linear-feet rock slope protection, 2,150- foot-long landside combination stability/seepage berm, 825-foot-long landside levee repair and a landside toe drainage pump station.
339
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
8 Final Construction documents were developed based on the GBODR that are ready to advertise pending final review and environmental certifications. 2.1.5 Programmatic DDR A Programmatic Design Document Report (DDR) will be prepared to summarize the technical basis for the Pre- Construction Engineering & Design (PED) phase of the West Sacramento Project. Levee underseepage and, to a lesser extent, levee through-seepage, stability and levee height erosion problems have been identified at many locations in the Sacramento levee system. The Programmatic DDR will establish technical basis for the appropriate levee mitigation measures for PED. A detailed DDR will be prepared for each construction contract based on Final H&H and design-level geotechnical data and analyses.

2.1.6 Value Engineering
Value engineering studies will be conducted on construction projects exceeding $2 million. The studies will focus on the 35% DDR and 35% plans and specifications.

2.2 Project Sponsor
The project non-Federal sponsor is the State of California, Central Valley Flood Protection Board (CVFPB) and the West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA). CVFPB also has a separate agreement with WSAFCA. WSAFCA products and analyses (design, final plans, specifications, Design Documentation Report (DDR), Engineering Documentation Report (EDR), MCACES Cost Estimate, and Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP). provided by non-Federal sponsor as in-kind services are subject to DQA, ATR, Policy and Legal Compliance, BCOES, and SAR reviews. Sponsor Peer Review of In-Kind Contributions - There will be in-kind contributions for this effort.

2.2.1 In-kind Contributions
Yolo Bypass Improvements
Engineering design services for the Yolo Bypass was performed by MGE Engineering, Inc. (MGE), an ArchitectEngineers (A/E) retained by the Non-Federal Sponsor (NFS). The A/E has completed 35% design, 65% design, 95% design, and final plans, specifications, DDREDR, MCACES Cost Estimate, and ECIFP. Take Mapping was also submitted at the 65% submittal and finalized at the 90% submittal. The A/E prepared a Quality Control Plan; the QCP required that all work be checked and certified by independent well qualified reviewers in accordance with Paragraph 4.7.5 and Chapter 9 of ER 1165-2-217 and that reviews assuring compliance with appropriate USACE guidance were completed prior to submittal of products to the USACE. The overall submittal QA review SM. Sacramento River North Levee Improvements
For the Sacramento North Levee, the NFS will hire an A/E firm to prepare the project survey, geotechnical data report, and geotechnical basis of design. The geotechnical data report and geotechnical basis of design will undergo DQA, ATR, and BCOES reviews.

Future Levee Improvement Measures
At this time design responsibility and any in-kind services for future levee improvement measures have not been determined. This plan will be revised as necessary when those decisions are made. 340
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
9 2.3 Environmental Documentation
The Endangered Species Act (ESA), California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) & National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents were prepared as part of the West Sacramento Project, General Reevaluation Report. The public review period for the draft EIS/EIR began on July 18, 2014, the official closing date for receipt of comments was September 2, 2014. All comments received were considered and incorporated into the final EIS/EIR, as appropriate. The public review period for the final EIS/EIR began on January 22, 2016, closed on February 22, 2016. The final EIS/EIR can be reviewed at: West Sacramento GRR Final EIS/EIR; Final EIS/EIR; mitigation measures that would be implemented during construction are listed in Section 3.0 aws and regulations that relate to the impacted
resources discussed in Chapter 3 and their compliance status.

The proposed project would require discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S. under Section the Statement of Findings, and review and compliance determination according to the Section 404(b)(1) guidelines for the proposed project.

The ESA, CEQA and NEPA and other regulatory documents will need to be amended, revised and/or updated during final design. At this time all ESA and NEPA and other regulatory documents will be performed by inhouse staff.

Risk Assessment During Design
Risk assessments during design will be performed in accordance with ECB 2019-15. The review activities associated with the risk assessment are to be defined in this RP. Once the risk assessment during design is completed, this RP will be re-visited by the District, MSC, and RMC to determine if the review requirements in this RP need to be revised.

The design risk assessment will be reviewed by a small team composed of a LSOG representative, hydraulic engineer, and consequence specialist, as well as other subject matter experts as deemed appropriate for the project. The design risk assessment review will determine if there is a major risk concern, if there is a controversial process being used or if there will likely be a design deviation request. The determination to present a design risk assessment to the LSOG will be coordinated through the RMC.

The risk assessment completed near the end of construction will be reviewed by a full risk assessment review team, the review team will be composed of an ATR Lead, Geotechnical Engineer, Hydraulics and Hydrology Engineer, Structural Engineer, and Consequence specialist; the same review team will be used for the risk assessment, design, and construction documents to the maximum extent possible. The district LSO will be a member of the DQC team for risk assessments. The final risk assessment products and decision documents will be presented to LSOG as deemed necessary, the timing of this submission to LSOG will be coordinated with the RMC.

The preliminary risk assessment milestone schedule is listed in Table 14. The baseline and project risk assessment have been completed for the Yolo Bypass Levee. 341
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
10 Project Delivery Team Reviews
PDT Reviews are in addition to the independent DQC Reviews described in Section 5. The PDT Reviews are to ensure consistency and effective coordination across all project disciplines for the work product. For example, the PDT will perform a complete reading of any reports and accompanying appendices prepared by the PDT to assure the overall coherence and integrity of the report, technical appendices, and the recommendations before approval. The PDT will normally include a variety of stakeholders, each with his/her own important project requirements and a different, but interlocking, review responsibility. The PDT Review may also include a plansin-hand review at the end of development. PDT Reviews, as an extension of the DQC, will be conducted as directed in the MSC/District QMS processes.

District Quality Control

5.1 Requirements
All implementation documents (including supporting data, analyses, reports, environmental compliance documents, O&M manuals, etc.) and risk assessment reports shall undergo DQC/DQA in accordance with ER 1165-2-217. DQC/DQA will be performed on all early release decision information (i.e., hydraulic conditions, geotechnical parameters, loading conditions, etc.) and certified complete down to the component or subcomponent level prior to incorporation into the design. The District shall perform these minimum required reviews (see Appendix F, 2. Sample DQC/DQA Certification Form in ER1165-2- Management Plan; QMP.docx
Some of the design work required for the West Sacramento Project is anticipated to be performed by A-E contractors and they will be responsible for implementing their own Quality Control processes according to USACE Standards. As such, the DQC/DQA Review Team will be responsible for performing Quality Assurance (QA) reviews of all A-E contractor deliverables.

The documentation of DQC/DQA will be at: pw://PWINT-WPC.EIS.DS.USACE.ARMY.MIL:CESPK&space;- &space;Sacramento&space;District/Documents/P{899d5569-ee89-4227-9bfc-c5410877aa84. 5.2 Products to Undergo DQC The following will be developed and reviewed for each reach of levee improvements comprising the project:

Construction Schedules
Current Working Estimate and Certified Cost Estimates
342
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
11 Programmatic DDR
DDR (to including results of supporting geotechnical, hydrologic, and hydraulic analyses) Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) Report Environmental Documentation
O&M Manual
Plans and Specifications
Risk Assessments

5.3 Schedule and Estimated Cost of DQC
Although DQC is a seamless process, the following milestone reviews are scheduled in Error! Reference s ource not found.. The cost for
The cost for the DQC / DQA will be approximately $ 250,000 per design construction package, number of packages dependent on fiscal year funding availability. DQC / DQA will not occur concurrently with ATR.

Agency Technical Review

6.1 Requirements
All implementation documents (including supporting data, analyses, reports, environmental compliance documents, water control manuals, etc.) and risk assessment reports shall undergo ATR in accordance with ER 1165-2-217. ATR reviews will occur seamlessly, including early involvement of the ATR team for validation of key design decisions, and at the scheduled milestones as shown in Section 6.5. A site visit will not be scheduled for the ATR Team. A kick-off call will be held with the ATR which will include aerial imagery and photos captured by the PDT. The construction and geotechnical members of the SAR Panel are required to perform site visits early in design and periodically in a risk-informed manner during construction. Documentation of ATR will occur using DrChecksSM, the four-part comment structure, responses from the PDT using the three-part structure, and back checking as outlined in ER 1165-2-217

6.2 Products to Undergo ATR
Construction Schedules
343
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
12 Current Working Estimate
Programmatic DDR
DDR
Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) Report Environmental Documentation
O&M Manual
Plans and Specifications
Risk Assessments

6.3 Required Team Expertise and Requirements
The ATR team disciplines and required expertise may vary for larger projects with multiple reviews, not all disciplines may be required for all reviews. Although the same ATR team members will be used to the maximum extent possible throughout the life of the project, it may be necessary to replace ATR team members based on availability or required expertise in the future. The ATR Lead and PDT will confirm ATR team member availability prior to each review. Changes in ATR team members will be coordinated through the ATR Lead with the RMO and tracked in Table 15. RP Revision.

The following disciplines will be required for ATR of this project, but may be modified depending on the needs of the particular project reach being developed:

ATR Lead: The ATR team lead is a senior professional outside the home MSC with extensive experience in preparing Civil Works documents and conducting ATRs. The lead has the necessary skills and experience to lead a virtual team through the ATR process. The ATR lead may also serve as a reviewer for a specific discipline, depending on their relevant expertise. Since a SAR is required, the ATR Lead will be an engineer with a strong levee safety background.

Civil Engineer - Reviewer shall be a senior level, professionally registered engineer with extensive experience in their field with particular emphasis on levee safety, seepage mitigation and bank erosion protection projects.

The civil engineer shall have demonstrated experience in a variety of civil engineering and construction-related activities involving site layout, surveying, 3-dimensional modeling, construction techniques, grading, erosion control, interior drainage, earthwork, and relocation of underground utilities. The reviewer should have a minimum of 10 years of experience.

Construction Engineer - Reviewer shall be a senior level with experience and be proficient in performing construction management for USACE levee rehabilitation projects. The team member shall be a registered erience in the above areas.

Consequences (Economist) - The economist (or consequence specialist) will have experience evaluating flood risk management projects in accordance with ER 1105-2-100 and USACE models and techniques to estimate population at risk, life loss, and economic damages for levee safety risk analysis. 344
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
13 Engineering Geologist - shall have experience in assessing internal erosion (seepage and piping) beneath levees. The engineering geologist shall be familiar with identification of geological hazards, exploration techniques, field and laboratory testing, and instrumentation. The engineering geologist shall be experienced in the design of grout curtains and must be knowledgeable in grout theology, concrete mix designs, and other materials used in foundation seepage barriers.

Environmental - The environmental reviewer should be experienced in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process and analysis and have a biological or environmental background.

Geotechnical Engineer - shall be a professionally registered engineer and have experience in the field of geotechnical engineering, analysis, design, and construction of large flood control levees. The geotechnical engineer shall have experience in subsurface investigations, rock and soil mechanics, pile design, internal erosion (seepage and piping), slope stability evaluations, erosion protection design, retaining wall design, and earthwork construction. The geotechnical engineer shall have knowledge and experience in the forensic investigation of seepage, settlement, stability, and deformation problems associated with high head dams and appurtenances constructed on rock and soil foundations. The geotechnical team members should be a Subject Matter Expert.

Hydraulic Engineer - Reviewer shall be a senior level, professionally registered engineer with extensive experience in the hydrologic modeling and analysis, floodplain analysis based on return period or Annual Exceedance Probability (AEP) events, familiarity with standard Corps hydrologic and hydraulic computer models (including but not limited to HEC-HMS, HEC-RAS, HEC-ResSim, HEC-DSS, HEC-SSP, and IPAST) and knowledgeable of major studies such as Central Valley Hydrology Study (CVHS). The hydrologic member shall be familiar with various hydrological tools, principles and approaches (e.g. Coincident Flow Frequency, Composite Floodplain approach, Centerings) as used by earlier major studies including CVHS. The reviewer shall be familiar with Corps application of hydrologic design of river systems that have incorporated levees for flood risk management, risk and uncertainty analyses in flood damage reduction studies, and hydrologic modeling and analysis for dam safety investigations."
Operations - Senior-level engineer with 10 or more years in inspecting, operating and maintain USACE levee systems. Note: This reviewer shall only review draft and final O&M Manual.

Table 2. ATR Milestone Reviews
Review Responsibilities
Milestone Reviews Civil Geotech Geologist H&H Structural Cost Construction Environmental Consequences ATR 35% Review X X X X X X X
Design Risk Assessment
Report

X X X X X
ATR 65% P&S Review X X X X X X X
ATR 95% P&S Review X X X X X X X
345
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
14 Final Risk Assessment
Report

X X X X X
This table will be updated during construction.

6.4 Statement of Technical Review Report
At the conclusion of each ATR effort, the ATR team will prepare a review report using the RMC template with a completion and certification memo.

6.5 Schedule and Estimated Cost of ATR
The cost for the ATR will be approximately $ 150,000 per design construction package, number of packages dependent on fiscal year funding availability. ATR will not occur concurrently with DQC.

BCOES Review

7.1 Requirements
All implementation documents (including supporting data, analyses, reports, environmental compliance documents, water control manuals, etc.) shall undergo BCOES review in accordance with ER 415-1-11 and ER 1110-1-12. BCOES reviews are done during design for a project using the design-bid-build (D-B-B) method or during development of the request for proposal (RFP) for a design-build (D-B) project. The BCOES review results are to be incorporated into the procurement documents for all construction projects. The BCOES review will be documented in DrChecksSM
and maintenance staff. The BCOES roster is provided in Attachment 1, Table 10 346
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
15 Safety Assurance Review

8.1 Decision on SAR
The District Chief of Engineering has made a risk-informed-decision that this project poses a significant threat to human life (public safety) and therefore a SAR will be performed. Upon completion of the design risk assessment, the District Chief of Engineering will reassess the determination of SAR requirement.

A catastrophic failure of the levee system around West Sacramento would imperil the health and safety of approximately 48,000 residents, shut down two of Californi -80 and U.S. Highway 50), an important rail link from the San Francisco Bay area to the rest of the country, and cause significant residential, commercial, and industrial property damage with an estimated loss of over $6 billion.

Because failure of the proposed levee improvements around the City of West Sacramento would pose a significant threat to human life, Safety Assurance Reviews will be conducted. Independent Engineering Consulting firms will be utilized to perform these reviews. Independent Engineering Consulting firms will be utilized to perform these reviews. The SAR will be coordinated through the RMC, whether it is performed through contract acquisition or by another government agency.

8.2 Products to Undergo SAR
SAR Panels will be required to review all construction contract documents once the 65% design phase is reached and back check after the 95% design phase. Documents which will be given to the panels include the construction drawings, specifications, associated design documentation reports (DDR) and programmatic DDR. The SAR panels will also be utilized to review the ensuing construction at its 30% and 60%. During the construction phase reviews, the panels will be provided any documentation associated with engineering during construction (modifications, etc.) which resulted from changed site conditions or significant design changes.

8.3 Required SAR Panel Expertise
The following disciplines will be required for SAR of this project:

Geotechnical Engineer - The panel member must meet the general requirements, and may be employed by a private engineering firm, a public agency, or academia. Licensure as a geotechnical engineer is desirable. The Geotechnical Engineer panel member shall have at least 15 years of experience in the general field of geotechnical engineering. The member must have extensive experience in design projects including groundwater seepage analysis, slope stability analysis, seepage cutoff walls constructed with soil mixing and slurry methods, pile design, seepage or stability berms, drains, filters, relief wells, geosynthetics, and earthwork quality assurance and control. The panel member shall have familiarity with preparing plans and specifications for USACE projects, knowledge of USACE design and construction procedures and policies, as well as USACE levee safety assurance policy and guidance.

Hydraulic Engineer The Panel Member should have 15 years of experience with engineering analysis related to flood risk management and open channel flow. The engineer shall have the knowledge, skills and abilities to analyze projects with sediment transport, delineation of alluvial boundaries, and of scour and deposition 347
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
16 components. The Panel member will hold an advanced degree in Civil, Hydrology or Hydraulics Engineering.

The Panel Member should have expert level proficiency with open channel flow modeling using HEC-RAS.

Construction Engineer Reviewer should be a senior level, professionally registered engineer with extensive experience in the engineering construction field with particular emphasis on levee rehabilitation projects. The Construction reviewer should have a minimum of 15 years of experience.

Documentation of SAR will be prepared in accordance with ER 1165-2-217.

8.4 Scope, Schedule, and Estimated Cost of
The SARs will be performed in accordance with ER 1165-2-217. Documentation of SAR will use the RMC SAR Report template. SAR reviews will occur at the milestones shown in Table 13. The estimated costs for the SARs of this project are in the range of $ 240,000 to $ 275,000. This estimate will be refined when the Scope of Work for the SAR task order is completed. The members of the SAR Panel are listed in Table 11.

Table 3 Milestone Reviews with Required Reviewers and Site Visit Duration Milestone Reviews
Site Visit or
Conference Call
Duration (days)
Review
Start Date
Review End
Date
65% Design X O X 1 ** ** 95% Design O O O 0.5 ** ** 35% of Construction X O X 1 ** ** 65% of Construction X O X 1 ** ** Review Plan Approval and Updates The MSC Commander, or delegated official, is responsible for approving this RP. reflects vertical team input (involving the District, MSC, and RMC) as to the appropriate scope, level of review, and endorsement by the RMC. The RP is a living document and should be updated in accordance with ER 1165- 2-217. All changes made to the approved RP will be documented in Attachment 3, Error! Reference source n ot found. and shared with the RMC and MSC. The latest version of the RP approval memorandum, will be provided to the RMO.
348
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
17 Engineering Models
The use of certified, validated, or agency approved engineering models is required for all activities to ensure the models are technically and theoretically sound, compliant with USACE policy, computationally accurate, and based on reasonable assumptions. The responsible use of well-known and proven USACE developed and commercial engineering software will continue and the professional practice of documenting the application of the software and modeling results will be followed. The selection and application of the model and the input and output data is still the responsibility of the users and is subject to DQC, ATR, BCOES, Policy and Legal Compliance review, and SAR (if required). Where such approvals have not been completed, appropriate independent checks of critical calculations will be performed and documented. The following engineering models, software, and tools are anticipated to be used:

Table 4 Engineering Models and Status
Model Name Version
HEC-HMS 4.3
HEC-RAS 5.0.6
HEC-LifeSIM 1.0.1
Geostudio SlopeW and SeepW 9.0.4.15639
STWAVE 6.2.xx
FUNWAVE 3.3
HEC-SSP 2.1.1
HEC-DSSVue 3.0.00.98
Review Plan Points of Contact
Table 5 RP
Title Organization Phone
Project Manager CESPK-PMC-C (916)557-7890
Technical Lead CESPK-EDD-A (916)557-7284
Senior Reviewer CEIWR-RMC (304)399-5217
349
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
18 Team Rosters (CUI)
(To be Removed Prior to Posting on
District Website)
Table 6 Risk Assessment Team
Discipline/Role Name Description of Credentials
Lead / Geotechnical Nick Beckmann Geotechnical Engineer, USACE LRL, Geotechnical & Risk Cadre Section. Mr.
expertise includes Deep and
shallow foundation design, settlement
analysis, liquefaction analysis and
geotechnical report preparation. Quality
Assurance of consultant and in-house design
plans and specifications. Baselinerisk
assessment for high-hazard dams in
accordance with Corps of Engineers criteria
including participation in PotentialFailure
Modes Analysis (PFMA), Team Elicitation
(EOE) and risk analysis using Best Practices.

Software applications include GEO-Studio
suite, DAMRAE and @Risk.

Co-Lead / Geologist Anthony Paschall Regional Technical Specialist (Geologist/Risk), USACE LRL. Mr.
expertise includes risk assessments as they
relate to earthen and concrete dams,
concepts of rock andsoil mechanics,
materials engineering, and seismology. Mr.

Paschall has been alead, team member, a
reviewer, or a facilitator of 25+ risk
assessments on various flood risk
management and
had extensiveinvolvement in the
development and analysis of geologic and
geotechnical parameters as they relate to
internal erosion, overtopping, spillway
erosion, and external and internal sliding
mechanisms.
350
Review Plan Implementation South
Sacramento District
19 Table 6 Risk Assessment Team
Discipline/Role Name Description of Credentials
Geotechnical Engineer Mark L. Jones Geotechnical Engineer, USACE LRL, Geotechnical Risk Cadre Section. Mr.
expertise includes soil mechanics
and foundation engineering; engineering
geotechnics; subsurface geotechnical
investigations; risk assessment evaluations
of embankment dams; familiar with
analysis of design issues including design of
soil foundations, embankment slope
stability, deep foundation systems, and
settlement; liquefaction screening and
residual strength estimation.

Hydrologic and Hydraulic
Engineer
Nathan Chappell Hydraulic Engineer, USACE LRL. Mr.
expertise includes hydrologic
and hydraulic engineering evaluation for
risk assessment of high-risk dams and
levees within the USACE portfolio.

Evaluation of dams and spillways with
respect to spillway capacity and dam
failure analysis. Hydrologic and Hydraulic
steady and unsteady-state numerical
modeling for large riverine applications as
well as for site specific studies and design.

Completing hydrologic loading for dam
safety and levee safety risk assessments.

Economist Sarah Mattingly Economist, USACE LRL. Ms.
includes risk
evaluation of dams and levees, analysis of
life safety and economic consequences
related to failure of dams and levees,
including issues related to warning,
evacuation, and structure inventory.

Analysis programs HEC-LifeSim, HEC- FIA
and ArcGIS.

Structural Engineer Coty Young, P.E. Structural Engineer, USACE LRL. Mr. analysis and design of steel, concrete, and
masonry systems, high seismic design and
detailing of buildings, modal response
spectrum analysis for steel structures,
building codes and structural codes, USACE
engineering manuals, regulations, and
policies, DoD Unified Facilities Criteria and
Unified Facilities Guide specifications,
351
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
20 Table 6 Risk Assessment Team
Discipline/Role Name Description of Credentials
progressive collapse analysis, steel material
standards, construction document creation,
structural design review, and building
structures and floodwalls evaluation and
investigation. Structural engineering
experience includes designing multistory
buildings, earth retaining structures,
floodwalls, and repairs for lock and dam
structural components.

Table 7 DQC/DQA Reviewers
Discipline/Role Name Description of Credentials
DQC Review Lead Will Hall
focusing on design of flood risk management
projects such as flood control channels,
levees, dams, and riverbank protection.

Currently serves with the Sacramento District
as the Chief, CW Design Branch. Registered
Professional Engineer in California.

Civil Engineering Richard A Torbik
focusing on design of flood risk
management projects such as flood control
channels, levees, dams, and riverbank
protection. Currently serves with the
Sacramento District as the Chief of the Civil
Works Design Section B. Registered
Professional Engineer in California.

Cost Engineering Joe Reynolds Cost Engineer with 30+ years in public and corps environments as a construction
estimator/cost engineer in the application of
scientific principles and techniques to
problems of cost estimating, cost control,
business planning and management science,
profitability analysis, project management,
and planning and scheduling.
352
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
21 Table 7 DQC/DQA Reviewers
Discipline/Role Name Description of Credentials
Cultural Resources Joanne Goodsell Archaeologist and Cultural Resources Regional Technical Specialist for US Army
Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District; 12
years of Federal government service focused
primarily on Section 106 and NEPA
compliance associated with water
development, restoration, and
infrastructure projects in California and the
Great Basin.

Environmental David J Colby Supervisory Fisheries Biologist with the US Fish and Wildlife Service for 10 years. Seven
years in Environmental Planning/Analysis as a
Senior Environmental Manager for US Army
Corps of Engineers.

Hydraulic Analysis Derek J Pate PE with 10 years of experience in the field of flood risk management, specializing in flood
event analysis, levee design and construction,
and emergency response.

Hydraulic Design Shyamal Chowdhury PhD Level Civil Engineer with 30 plus years of experience in hydrology and hydraulic
analysis; and hydraulic design in the private
and public sector. Have experience in all
aspects of levee design, construction,
operation, and maintenance.

Geotechnical Franco De Paola Geotechnical Engineer with over 7 performing geotechnical
investigations, design and analyses for
wide variety of projects including
levee remediation, seismic, seepage
and slope stability analysis; currently
assigned to SPK Soil Design Section B.

Levee Safety Glen A Johnson Civil Engineer at the USACE for 12 years working in the Soil Design Section, Valley
Resident Office, and the Levee Safety Section
with experience focusing on design and
construction of levee projects.

Planning TBD Senior Planner with 15 years of experience in USACE civil works planning and policy.
353
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
22 Table 7 DQC/DQA Reviewers
Discipline/Role Name Description of Credentials
Quality Assurance Aaron Klapheck Lead Specifications Engineer for the District.

District Proponent for Engineering and Design
Quality Management. Design Criteria
Manager for the District.

Table 8 Advisors
Discipline/Role Name Description of Credentials
RMC Advisor TBD
RMC Advisor TBD
Table 9 ATR Team
Discipline Name Description of Credentials
ATR Lead Matt Sheskier Mr. Sheskier is a PE Civil Engineer with the Risk Management Center, serving as a
Construction Liaison Engineer. He has 30
plus years of experience working on design
and construction of Safety of Dams and
Levee remediation projects with USACE and
the Bureau of Reclamation.

Geotechnical Engineer Bobby Van Cleave Mr. Van Cleave is a senior geotechnical engineer and has worked for the US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE) for over 19
years. He is member of the Southwest
Production Center
Civil Engineer Bryon Dirks Mr. Dirks is a Registered Professional Civil Engineer currently working in the St. Louis
District as a Civil Engineer in the Civil Design
Section and serves as a Civil Engineering
Regional Technical Specialists for the
Mississippi River Valley Division.
354
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
23 Table 9 ATR Team
Discipline Name Description of Credentials
Hydraulic Engineer Nick Koutsunis Mr. Koutsunis is a Registered Professional Civil Engineer currently working in the
Huntington District. He has over 6 years of
hydraulic engineering experience with the
US Army Corps of Engineers. He also
serves as a hydraulic engineer in the
regional Dam Safety Production Center
and national Dam Safety Mandatory
Center of Expertise
Construction Engineer David Howell Mr. Howell is a Registered Professional Civil Engineer currently working as a
Construction Liaison Engineer for
Dam Safety Production Center
Southwestern Division. Mr. Howell has
31 + years of experience working on
design and construction of both military
and civil works projects with the Corps of
Engineers and the Air Force.

Environmental Rebecca Rutherford Ms. Rutherford is a Supervisory Biologist Compliance Officer for the Huntington
District Corps of Engineers within the
Environmental Analysis Section, Planning
Branch. She has over 25 years of NEPA and
environmental compliance experience.

Engineering Geologist
TBD
Senior-level geologist with 10 or more
years identification of geological hazards,
exploration techniques, field and
laboratory testing, and instrumentation.

Economist (Consequences)
TBD
Senior-level economist with 10 or more
years specialized experience in
determining the socioeconomic impact
and benefits of flood risk management
and the ability to apply computer based
models to assess consequences, identify
risk and uncertainty, and estimate socio
economic impacts of civil works projects.
355
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
24 Table 9 ATR Team
Discipline Name Description of Credentials
Operations TBD Senior-level engineer with 10 or more
years in inspecting, operating and
maintain USACE levee systems.

Risk Cadre Team Member Nick Beckmann Geotechnical Engineer, USACE LRL, Geotechnical & Risk Cadre Section.

Table 10 BCOES Team
Review Name Description of Credentials
Biddability, Constructability
and Sustainability
Justin Puffer Chief of Construction Quality Assurance
Section with USACE Sacramento District. PE
with a total of 16 years of design and
construction experience, 11 years with
USACE Sacramento District.

Operability Juan Gonzalez Mr. Gonzalez is the Chief of the Inspection Section in the Operations
Division of the USACE Sacramento
District. He has over 11 years of
experience in the Sacramento District
working in various capacities. Mr.

Gonzalez provides technical expert support
as he is often engaged on projects
throughout the Sacramento District and
represents the Sacramento on
several national levee safety programs and
initiatives.

Environmental David Colby Supervisory Fisheries Biologist with the US Fish and Wildlife Service for 10 years. Seven
years in Environmental Planning/Analysis as
a Senior Environmental Manager for US
Army Corps of Engineers.
356
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
25 Table 11 SAR Panel
Discipline Name AE Firm Description of Credentials
Project Lead / Panel
Lead
Mary Knopf, PE Wood, PLC Ms. Knopf has over 11 years of project management and
engineering services on
geotechnical explorations and
geotechnical related
construction projects.

Geotechnical Engineer Mark Schuhmann, PE Wood, PLC Mr. Schuhmann has more than 41 years of civil and
geotechnical engineering
experience that includes
management responsibilities for
large projects with extensive
staffing as well as oversight of
detailed technical field activities.

Hydraulic Engineer Masoud Meshkat, PhD,

PE, CFM
Wood, PLC Mr. Meshkat has twenty-three
years of experience as a Water
Resources Engineer. His
specialty includes hydrologic
and hydraulic analysis of
unsteady and steady state flow
modeling in natural and
artificial streams using one- and
two- dimensional models.

Civil and Construction
Engineering
Jimmy Waddle, PE Wood, PLC Mr. Waddle retired from the
USACE with 34 years of service
as the Chief of Engineering and
Construction of the Nashville
District. As Chief of Engineering
and Construction he has more
than 34 years general
experience and oversight in
civil/structural, soils and
geotechnical, hydraulics and
hydrology,
electrical/mechanical,
construction management, and
environmental sciences.
357
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
26 Table 12. Review Plan Distribution
Role Name Email
RP POC/Technical Lead Damon Romero [email protected] Project Manager Bryon Lake [email protected]
RMC Review Inbox N/A [email protected]
RMC Nate Snorteland
Dave Carlson
John Clarkson
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Dam & Levee Safety QM Amy Riffee
Emily Calla
[email protected]
[email protected]
FRM-PCX Eric Thaut [email protected]
LSC Director (Levees
only)
Noah Vroman [email protected]
ATR Lead Matthew Sheskier [email protected] RMC Program
Manager(s)
Dara Sikorski
Jenni Reichard
[email protected]
[email protected]
MSC SES/LSO John Moreno [email protected]
MSC E&C Chief LTC David Kaulfers [email protected] MSC LSPM Boni Bigornia [email protected] MSC SPK District Support
Team Lead
Jessica Burton Evans [email protected] District ED Chief/LSO Rick Poeppelman [email protected] District LSPM Erik James [email protected]
District CW Branch Chief Will Hall [email protected] RP Awareness TBD
358
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
27 Project Risk Information (CUI)
(To be Removed Prior to Posting on
District Website)

2.1 Project Risks
The project authorization document, West Sacramento Project General Reevaluation Report lists the followinglevee challenges by reach in the following table:

Levee Reach Seepage/
Stability
Erosion Overtopping Vegetation and
Encroachments
Yolo Bypass X - - - DWSC West Levee X X X - DWSC East Levee X - - - Stone Locks X - X X Port South X - X X
South Cross Levee X - X - Sacramento River North
Levee

X X - X
Sacramento River South
Levee

X X - X
Sacramento Bypass
Training Levee
X X - - A catastrophic failure of the levee system around West Sacramento would imperil the health and safety of -80 and U.S. Highway 50),
an important rail link from the San Francisco Bay area to the rest of the country, and cause significant residential, commercial, and industrial property damage.

Failure of the levees would imperil the health and safety of up to 48,000 residents, functioning of the state government and other infrastructure. There will also be a loss of over $6 billion in residential, commercial, and industrial property damage.

Because failure of the proposed levee improvements around the City of West Sacramento would pose a significant threat to human life, Safety Assurance Reviews will be conducted. Independent Engineering Consulting firms will be utilized to perform these reviews. 2.2 Construction Risks Construction of seepage, stability and overtopping SSO levee improvements typically requires excavation of at least part of the levee embankment in order to install seepage cutoff walls and other types of improvements.

During this time the line of protection to the adjacent community is compromised. When construction is 359
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
28 performed outside the designated flood season (November 1 April15) the risk to the community is low and as such work on all SSO improvements is required to be performed outside the flood season. However, if unforeseen delays cause the construction schedule to slip into the flood season the risk to the community becomes significant.

When work during the flood season is unavoidable, a mitigating measure taken to reduce risk to the community for all SSO contracts is the requirement for the Contractor to prepare a Flood Contingency Plan which is essentially an emergency levee reconstruction plan. In the event that a flood is imminent and the line of protection is still compromised, the Flood Contingency Plan details the steps the Contractor will take to restore the line of protection as quickly as possible before the flood reaches the work area.

2.3 Vegetation and Encroachments

2.3.1 Existing Conditions

WEST SACRAMENTO NORTH BASIN

SACRAMENTO BYPASS SOUTH LEVEE
In some areas, there is moderate landside vegetation (mostly large trees) existing near the levee toe, but few at the levee toe or on the levee slope. Encroachments include utility poles near the landside toe along the levee alignment.

SACRAMENTO RIVER WEST LEVEE
On the Sacramento River west levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 307+60) there is significant vegetation on the waterside bench which varies in thickness. Typically, within the reach, the waterside bench becomes wider moving downstream from the confluence with the Sacramento Bypass and vegetation increases to a point (Sta. 190+00) and then begins to taper in width heading towards the more downstream portions nearing the Stone Lock. In some areas, there is significant landside vegetation (mostly large trees) existing near the levee toe, or on the levee slope. On the landside numerous encroachments including fences at or near the landside levee toe, parking lots built, significant residential/commercial developments and industrial facilities nearing the downstream portion of the alignment exist.

PORT NORTH LEVEE
The Port North levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 245+55) contains sparse riparian habitat (vegetation) adjacent to the levee embankment. There is very little landside vegetation existing near the levee toe or on the levee slope. On the waterside bench moderate vegetation exists, mostly trees lining the turning basin of the Port of West Sacramento. Encroachments include utility poles near the landside toe along the levee alignment, multiple railroad tracks, and commercial developments.

YOLO BYPASS EAST LEVEE
On the Yolo Bypass east levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 197+65) there is moderate riparian habitat (vegetation) on the existing waterside bench the majority of which are medium to large trees. There is very little landside vegetation existing near the levee toe or on the levee slope. Encroachments include fences, utility poles near the landside toe along the levee alignment, commercial/industrial developments, the I-80 freeway overcrossing, and railroad tracks.

SACRAMENTO BYPASS NORTH LEVEE
360
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
29 The Sacramento Bypass north levee contains moderate riparian habitat (vegetation) adjacent to the levee embankment. The landside vegetation is very sparse, with little to no vegetation at the landside toe, or on the landside slope. On the waterside, there are notable amounts of large trees near the waterside berm and continuing out laterally into the channel for the majority of the alignment. Few encroachments are present along the alignment; nearing the upstream limit, a small pump station is adjacent to the landside levee slope

WEST SACRAMENTO SOUTH BASIN

PORT SOUTH LEVEE
The Port South levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 189+65) contains sparse riparian habitat (vegetation) adjacent to the levee embankment. There is very little landside vegetation existing near the levee toe or on the levee slope. On the waterside bench moderate vegetation exists, mostly trees lining the adjacent downstream portion near the Stone Lock structure. Encroachments include the Daniel C. Palmadessi bridge overcrossing, and commercial/industrial facility structures near the landside of the levee embankment.

SACRAMENTO RIVER WEST LEVEE
On the Sacramento River west levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 332+70) there is significant vegetation on the waterside bench which varies in thickness. Typically, within the reach, the waterside bench becomes wider moving ly in width as the embankment is directly
adjacent to the channel. In some areas, there is significant landside vegetation (mostly large trees) existing near the levee toe, or on the levee slope. On the landside, numerous encroachments including residential subdivisions, fence lines, driveways, and irrigation ditches exist throughout the alignment.

SOUTH CROSS LEVEE
The South Cross levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 65+00) contains moderate riparian habitat (vegetation) adjacent to the levee embankment. There is very little landside vegetation existing near the levee toe or on the levee slope. At the waterside bench, moderate vegetation exists, sporadic trees line the edge of the channel.

Encroachments include residential homes, fencelines, and various outstructures near the landside of the levee embankment.

DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL WEST LEVEE
The Deep Water Ship Channel west levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 1133+14) contains sparse riparian habitat (vegetation) adjacent to the levee embankment on both the landside and waterside. There is a significant waterside bench throughout the alignment as the channel is offset from the levee centerline approximately 500ft. There are few encroachments throughout the alignment which include fences and utility poles.

YOLO BYPASS EAST LEVEE
On the Yolo Bypass east levee (Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 145+00) there is very limited riparian habitat (vegetation) on the existing waterside bench the majority of which are medium to large trees. Encroachments include fences, utility poles near the landside toe along the levee alignment, residential developments, a pump station facility near the downstream limit of the alignment, and an irrigation ditch at the landside levee toe. 2.3.2 Managing Vegetation and Encroachments During PED, the contract packages will be developed to meet vegetation, encroachment, and access policies included in EM 1110-2-1913, SOP-003, and ETL 1110-2-571 Guidelines for Landscaping and Vegetation Management at Levees, Floodwalls, Embankments Dams, and Appurtenant Structures. The vegetation-free 361
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
30 zone, as established by ETL 1110-2-571, is a three-dimensional corridor surrounding all levees, floodwalls, and critical appurtenant structures in a flood damage reduction system. The vegetation-free zone applies to all vegetation except grass. The minimum height of the corridor is 8 feet, measured vertically from any point on the ground. The minimum width of the corridor is the width of the flood-control structure (Levee toes or floodwall stem), plus 15 feet on each side, measured from the outer edge of the outermost critical structure. The figure below is a representation of the vegetation-free zone of a basic levee cross-section.

For a levee section to be considered compliant with USACE vegetation policy it must either have been cleared of vegetation within the vegetation free zone or eligible for a variance from USACE policy on vegetation in ETL 1110-2-571. Since the publication of ETL 1110-2-571, a Policy Guidance Letter (PGL) has been developed stating that waterside planting berm is acceptable. The variance must assure that safety, structural integrity, and functionality are retained, and accessibility for maintenance, inspection, monitoring, and flood-fighting are retained. The variance may require structural measures to mitigate vegetation, such as overbuilt sections, to improve levee system reliability, redundancy, or resiliency with respect to the detrimental impacts of the vegetation.

Any design deviation is subject to review by the district and division levee safety program managers. The proposed design deviation will be presented or provided to the SPK and SPD LSPMs and LSO per relevant SPK and SPD quality management plans, protocols, and manuals, and for concurrence before submission of the VDD Memo to Risk-Informed Design Coordination Group (RIDCG). A memorandum approving the design deviation will be developed for the District and Division LSOs' review and approval. The memorandum will document that the District LSO, who also is the District's Chief of Engineering, has ensured that the risks posed by the VDD Memo have been assessed and that risk is within Tolerable Risk Guidelines (TRG 1 to 4) as outlined in ECB 2019-15 "Interim Approach for Risk-Informed Designs for Dam and Levee Projects." 362
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
31 Preliminary PED Project Milestones
(To be Removed Prior to Posting on
District Website)
Table 13 - Preliminary PED Milestone Schedule
Project Phase/Submittal Estimated Completion
Yolo Bypass Levee
35% Review DQA 07-Feb-20
35% Review ATR 07-Feb-20
65% Review DQA & BCOES 13-Jul-20
65% Review ATR & SAR 22-Jul-20
95% Review DQA, ATR, SAR & BCOES 21-Apr-21
100% Review BCOES 30-Sep-21
Construction 30% SAR 24-May-22
Construction 60% SAR 31-Aug-22
Sacramento River North - 1st Increment
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 22-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 23-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 23-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 24-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 24-Q3
Construction 60% SAR FY 24-Q4
Programmatic DDR
Draft Review DQC, ATR & SAR FY 23-Q2
Final Review DQC, ATR % SAR FY 23-Q4
Sacramento River North - 2nd Increment
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 23-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 24-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 24-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 25-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 25-Q3
363
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
32 Construction 60% SAR FY 25-Q4
Sacramento River North - 3rd Increment
Project Phase/Submittal Estimated Completion
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 24-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 25-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 25-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 26-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 26-Q3
Construction 60% SAR FY 26-Q4
Training Dike
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 24-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 25-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 25-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 26-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 26-Q3
Construction 60% SAR FY 26-Q4
Lock Closure Levee
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 23-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 24-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 24-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 25-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 25-Q3
Construction 60% SAR FY 25-Q4
Deep Water Ship Channel East Levee
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 25-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 26-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 26-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 27-Q1
Phase 1 Construction 30% SAR FY 27-Q3
Phase 1 Construction 60% SAR FY 27-Q4
Phase 2 Construction 30% SAR FY 28-Q3
Phase 2 Construction 60% SAR FY 28-Q4
Phase 3 Construction 30% SAR FY 29-Q3
Phase 3 Construction 60% SAR FY 29-Q4
364
Review Plan Implementation South
Pacific Division Sacramento District
33 Phase 4 Construction 30% SAR FY 30-Q3
Phase 4 Construction 60% SAR FY 30-Q4
Project Phase/Submittal Estimated Completion
Deep Water Ship Channel West Levee
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 25-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 26-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 26-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 27-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 27-Q3
Construction 60% SAR FY 27-Q4
South Cross Levee
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 26-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 27-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 27-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 27-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 27-Q3
Construction 60% SAR FY 27-Q4
Port South Levee
35% Review DQC, ATR FY 27-Q4
65% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 28-Q2
95% Review DQC, ATR, SAR & BCOES FY 28-Q4
100% Review BCOES FY 29-Q1
Construction 30% SAR FY 29-Q3
Construction 60% SAR FY 29-Q4
Table 14. Preliminary Risk Assessment Milestone Schedule Project Phase/Reach Estimated Completion
Yolo Bypass Risk Assessment (RA) September 25, 2020
Sacramento River North RA October 2022
Training Dike/Lock Closure Levee RA October 2023
Deep Water Ship Channel East Levee RA October 2024
Deep Water Ship Channel West, Port South & South Cross LeveesRA October 2025 365
South Pacific Division Review Plan Implementation
Sacramento District
34 Review Plan Revisions
Table 1 RP Revisions
Revision Date Description of Change Page/Paragraph Number TBD RP Revisions should document
major changes after endorsement
& approval.

TBD
The PDT will update the RP to reflect minor changes as they occur with coordination of the RMC but without the need for re-approval. Re-approval of the RP by the MSC will be required when there are significant changes as outlined in ER 1165-2-217.
366

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN

YOLO BYPASS EAST LEVEE

WEST SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For
West Sacramento Flood Control Agency
1110 W Capitol Ave, West Sacramento, CA 95691
Prepared By
MGE Engineering
7415 Greenhaven Drive, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95831
November 19, 2019
Revised December 20, 2019
Attachment A
367

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
2 12/20/2019

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Background
The Sacramento River and its tributaries has a long history of flood problems. Flood control efforts date back to the mid-1800s with initial levee construction along the Sacramento, American, Feather, and Yuba Rivers. The Yolo Bypass Levee was constructed in the mid-1900s of uncompacted soil dredged from the waterside of the levee.

Countless post-construction waterside and landslide slope failures and seepage have occurred along the Yolo Bypass Levee due to high water events in the mid to late 1900s. As a result, improvements to the levee were constructed starting in the late 1900s through early 2000s. Notable floods include the February 1986 Flood which delivered more than half of the normal precipitation for the area. Reservoirs were filled beyond design capacities, and record flow releases produced flow nearly overtopping the levees. The record flow, in addition to high winds, caused severe erosion and seepage damage to the levee. Repairs were authorized under the Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) of 1992. While construction plans and specifications for repairs were in process, the New Year’s Day flood of 1997 resulted in further damage, with under seepage being the major problem. Efforts under the WRDA 1992 were revised to account for the damage that occurred during the 1997 storm. This revised design package was authorized under the Energy and Water Development and Appropriations Act (EWDAA) of 1999. Additional funding to address levee design concerns were provided in EWDAA of 2010.

The project features authorized through WRDA 1992, EWDAA 1999, and EWDAA 2010 resulted in a raising of the levee and installing of a slurry wall along a portion of the 4.7 miles of the east bank of the Yolo Bypass Levee from the Sacramento Bypass South to the Navigation Levee under the, “West Sacramento Project.” Work was completed in 2011. However, in 2007, the California Senate Bill (SB) 5, the Central Valley Flood Protection Act, required that urban communities reach a 200-year flood protection standard by 2025. Further analyses were performed as reported in current studies such as the “West Sacramento Project, General Reevaluation Report, Final Report, December 2015,” “West Sacramento, General Reevaluation Report, Final Environmental Impact Statement / Environmental Impact Report, December 2015,” and “City of West Sacramento Flood Engineering Services, Problem Identification Report, June 2016,” identifying seepage and slope stability, to remain cause for concern.

Description of Work and Services
The project will provide for the remediation of under seepage, erosion and slope stability on the portions of the YBEL identified in the General Reevaluation Report (GRR). MGE Engineering (MGE) will complete the 35% and 65% design of the levee improvements as the base contract, with completion of the 90% and 100% design being optional tasks that could be exercised at the discretion of WSAFCA and USACE. The design deliverables consist of project plans, specifications, Design Documentation Report (DDR), Geotechnical Basis of Design Report (GBOD), Engineering Documentation Report (EDR), MCACES Cost Estimate, Real Estate Take mapping and Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) for the Yolo Bypass Levee as part of the West Sacramento Project.

The project design will require seepage, stability and geometry remediation, rock revetment, and erosion prevention, site tie-in details upstream and downstream of the designed remediation, identification of facility relocations, identification of property lines and access points, identification of material staging locations and haul routes. Interaction of the proposed project with existing infrastructure may include the identification of required relocations to existing roads, utilities, public and private facilities, and drainage 368

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
3 12/20/2019
features. All traffic must be maintained during construction, with adequate detouring and signage included in the plans.

The designs will meet objectives outlined in the West Sacramento Project, General Reevaluation Report, Final Report, December 2015. MGE will perform supplemental studies and analysis to support the development of the designs. The supplemental analyses will include (1) field surveys to develop topographic, bathymetric, and planimetric data necessary for design within the anticipated construction footprint, (2) data collection and investigations necessary to evaluate the suitability of subsurface soils, (3) hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the establishment of a design water surface elevation (if not provided by USACE), (4) assessment of erosion potential from bypass flow and wind-generated waves, (5) and design level geotechnical investigations and analysis necessary to address seepage and stability deficiencies, and preparing geotechnical data report on the geotechnical aspects of the project. Field surveys and investigations conducted for the project will extend upstream and downstream of the two sites identified along this levee reach within the GRR to address possible end around effects and confirm the appropriate length of required levee improvements. A Drilling Program Plan (DPP) for borings within the levee prism will be prepared in accordance with ER 1111-1-1807 covering the work within this task.

The USACE will provide the final Levee Safety Officer (LSO) certification of the final Drilling Program Plan, prior to commencement of field activities.

MGE will provide temporary and permanent project footprints as described in the Statement of Work for Take Mapping. The information developed by MGE will be used by the non-Federal Sponsors to develop and pursue easements, and for procuring real estate if necessary.

The above noted scope of work will be completed by the MGE team. Subconsultants on the MGE team include:

Subconsultant Firm Name Service(s) to be provided
Blackburn Consulting, Inc. (BCI) Geotechnical Services
MBK Engineers (MBK) Hydrology/Hydraulics support and Technical Review of Basis of Design Documents
PSOMAS Surveying, Real Estate Mapping
cbec Geomorphology, Bathymetric Surveys, erosion and
scour analysis
Construction Estimating Services, LLC (CES) MCACES II Cost Estimates

PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL OBJECTIVES
The objectives of the Quality Control (QC) Plan are to set procedures for assuring and performing the quality functions by which the management, engineering, and incidental work necessary to complete the design assignments are completed in a manner that results in a product that is:
• Designed, detailed, and specified to USACE and industry standards of performance and accuracy; • Completed per the established schedule;
• Constructed with minimum change orders, no claims; and • Coordinated and in compliance with the USACE standards, policies, and users. 369

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
4 12/20/2019
The provisions within this QC Plan are applicable to MGE, and its’ subcontractors.

PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
MGE’s quality control plan consists of multiple reviews of all contract documents by the engineers supervising the work, as well as an Independent Technical Review (ITR) performed by staff not directly involved in the design of the project under review. Supervisory reviews, in addition to the review of the deliverables listed in the table below, will include quality checks of calculations and quantities, analysis and assumptions, and to ensure the deliverables meet the requirements and criteria listed in the SOW.

The supervising personnel responsible for internally reviewing the various design components are listed in the table below. In addition, the firms performing the ITR on each component are also indicated in the table below. Internal review comments will be discussed and resolved with the responsible designers.

ITR comments will be recorded in red on the documents and will be submitted to the designer using DrChecks in a comment-response-resolution format. The designer will review and respond to the ITR comments in writing using the DrChecks system. The ITR reviewers will conduct a back check of the designers written responses to ensure resolution of all comments. Upon successful resolution of ITR comments, the comments will be closed by the reviewer in DrChecks. For each submittal, the status and resolution of all DrChecks ITR comments will be available electronically in ProjNet.

Design Component Design
Firm
Supervising
Engineer
ITR Firm ITR Reviewer
30%, 60%, 90%, and Final
Levee Plans and
Specifications
MGE Stephen Hawkins, PE MBK Tom Engler, PE.

DDR and ECIFP MGE Stephen Hawkins, PE MBK
Tom Engler, PE
Mike Kynett, PE.

Utility Relocations MGE Stephen Hawkins, PE MBK Tom Engler, PE.

Civil Specifications MGE Stephen Hawkins, PE MBK Mike Kynett, PE Real Estate Take Mapping MGE Stephen Hawkins, PE MBK Tom Engler, PE Engineering
Documentation Report
(EDR)
MGE Stephen Hawkins, PE MBK Tom Engler, PE
GDR, Stability and
Seepage Analysis,
GBODR, Borrow Analysis
BCI Robert Lokteff, PE MGE Martin McIlroy, PE
Geomorphology, erosion
and scour analysis Cbec Chris Bowles, PE MBK Mike Kynett, PE MCACES Cost Estimate CES Patrick Jones, PE MGE Stephen Hawkins, PE 370

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
5 12/20/2019
All calculations, including the results of computer modeling, shall contain the name of the responsible engineer followed by the most recent date of the calculations as well as the handwritten initials of the person responsible for reviewing the calculations.

The independent technical review of the MCACES II Cost Estimate will consist of reviewing the assumptions on which the estimate is based, ensuring the quantities listed in the overall estimate match the agreed upon quantities provided by the design engineer, and ensuring the format complies with the USACE requirements for a MCACES Cost Estimate.

QUALITY CONTROL CERTIFICATION
MGE will certify in a Quality Control Certification (QCC), that will accompany the final submittal, that the procedures outlined in this QCP have been performed and all indentified concerns have been addressed and resolved.

PROJECT SCHEDULE
The following table presents the project schedule per the Statement of Work dated 26 July 2019 and a contract award date of 19 September 2019.

WORK SCHEDULE: The following work schedule covers the tasks outlined in the Statement of Work.

Adherence to the work schedule by the MGE team must be dependent on adherence to the Review Schedule for DQC, ATR, and SAR presented below. The work schedule assumes USACE and/or regulatory agency review comments will not require additional alternative analysis or exceed the threshold for revisions to design extents as described in the Statement of Work.

Task Task Completion
(calendar days after contract
award)
Task 1: Quality Control
Quality Control Plan
21 Task 2: P&S Yolo Bypass Levee
35% Design Submittal
90 Task 3: P&S Yolo Bypass Levee
65% Design Submittal
Draft RE Mapping
180
OPTIONAL Task 4: P&S Yolo Bypass Levee
90% Design Submittal
Final RE Mapping
300
OPTIONAL Task 5: P&S Yolo Bypass Levee
Final Design Submittal
360
Task 7: EDR for Yolo Bypass Levee 300
REVIEW SCHEDULE: The following reviews of submittals will be performed by WSAFCA, USACE (DQC and ATR) and others:

Draft Quality Control Plan 7 calendar days after receipt of submittal 35% Design Submittal for the Yolo Bypass Levee 14 calendar days after receipt of submittal 65% Design Submittal for the Yolo Bypass Levee (DQC
review)
21 calendar days after receipt of submittal
65% Design Submittal for the Yolo Bypass Levee 30 calendar days after receipt of submittal 371

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
6 12/20/2019
(ATR/SAR review)
Draft RE Mapping for the Yolo Bypass Levee 21 calendar days after receipt of submittal 90% Design Submittal the Yolo Bypass Levee (DQC
review)
14 calendar days after receipt of submittal
90% Design Submittal the Yolo Bypass Levee
(ATR/SAR review)
30 calendar days after receipt of submittal
Final Design Backcheck Review 7 calendar days after receipt of submittal EDR for the Yolo Bypass Levee 21 calendar days after receipt of submittal

OVERALL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
All base work and services must be completed within four hundred (400) calendar days after the effective date of the contract action.

STANDARDS OF PRACTICE
MGE, exercising reasonable care and professional competence, will complete deliverables and other elements in accordance with the requirements of the Scope of Services. As a minimum, the deliverables, including plans, design, calculations, reports, and other documents will be of a quality acceptable to WSAFCA and the USACE. The criteria for acceptance will be a product that is: neat, organized, technically and grammatically correct, and, as appropriate, sealed and signed by the California licensed engineer in responsible charge of the work.

COMMUNICATIONS/COORDINATION
MGE’s engineering staff will utilize direct communication with WSAFCA’s, DWR's and USACE’s project managers and technical leads to facilitate the scope of services. Refer to the table below for the names and contact information for the indentified personnel. Coordination between the MGE project manager, engineering staff, and the WSAFCA, DWR and USACE technical staff will be facilitated through meetings, phone calls, and emails. Either the project manager or a supervising engineer will attend scheduled meetings and prepare meeting minutes to document discussions and decisions made. All email correspondence will include Cc’s to the MGE project manager, and the WSAFCA and USACE technical discipline leaders. Telephone calls will be documented with written notes and filed in project binders. Furthermore, an email from the project manager to the WSAFCA and USACE technical leaders will serve to document important decisions or discussions resulting from telephone discussions.

Discipline
Leaders
Discipline Telephone
Number
E-Mail Address
Greg Fabun WSAFCA
Project Manager
(916) 617-4855 [email protected]
Stephen
Hawkins, PE
MGE Team
Project Manager
(916) 421-1000 [email protected]
Bryon Lake USACE (916) 557-7890 [email protected] 372

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
7 12/20/2019
Project Manager
Timotheus
Hampton, PE
USACE
Technical Lead
(916) 557-7048 [email protected]
Morgan O’Brien,
PE
DWR
Project Manager
916-574-0271 Morgan.O’[email protected]

RESUMES
Resumes for the MGE team members assigned to this project follow this page. 373
Proposal for Yolo Bypass Levee Project Design Services

STEPHEN HAWKINS, PE, QSD
Project Design Manager Years Experience: 39
Education (Degree and Specialization) Professional Registration BS/Civil Engineering
MBA/Business Administration
California – Civil Engineering #36556
Key Qualifications
Mr. Hawkins has broad and extensive experience in all facets of civil engineering. This experience includes planning and administration of projects involving civil design associated with flood protection, levee improvements, water resources, storm drainage, sanitary sewer design and construction, bridges, site development, and the full range of municipal engineering projects. Experienced in the use of the DrChecks system for review and SpecsIntact for preparation of specifications.

Relevant Projects
Marysville Ring Levee Rehabilitation, Yuba River Basin Flood Protection Project, Phase 2b and 3, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Project (Task Order) Manager for design under (Contract W91238-10-D-0016 Task Order 12), completion of Plans & Specifications, Design Documentation Report (DDR), Engineering Considerations, and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP), and identification of needed utility relocations and utilities to be protected in place for Phase 2B of the Marysville Ring Levee (MRL). Phase 2B is the segment the right bank of the Yuba River (near the confluence of the Feather River and Yuba River), between State Route 70 and Simpson Lane. Phase 2B, which is 5,150 linear feet in length, includes strengthening a portion of the existing levee and the construction of two set-forward levees. The section of levee designed for strengthening is adjacent to the historic downtown Marysville and the culturally significant Bok Kai Temple. Levee improvements for Phase 2B include construction of a soil-bentonite cutoff wall along the existing and realigned levees, location and closure of abandoned historic sewer tunnels, relocation of utilities, improvement of landside and waterside patrol roads, and improvements to levee embankments including correction of bank slopes. Design challenges included the development of vibration monitoring measures to avoid damage to the historic Bok Kai temple during construction, the relocation of overhead utilities crossing the levee, determining the location of existing sheet pile walls, bridge abutments and other features that may interfere with the installation of the cutoff wall, excavation and location of the historic sewer tunnels that may cross the levee, and other cultural and environmental constraints. Upon completion of Phase 2B, MGE was issued a Task Order under Contract W912P7-16-D-0006 to complete the final design for Phase 3 which had been completed prepared by the USACE San Francisco District (SPN) to the 90% design level, and combine the final design packages for Phase 2B and 3 into a single package for advertising and award for construction. This required modification of the documentation prepared by MGE for Phase 2B to incorporate Phase 3. Phase 3 extended northeasterly begins at from the terminus of the Phase 2B cutoff wall and extends northeast approximately 9,700 linear feet. Reach 3 is proposed to be a deep mix method, soil cement bentonite wall. All deliverables were provided using AutoCAD Civil 3D, Microsoft Word, and SpecsIntact. Design Fee: $979,804.07. Estimated Construction Cost: $9.3 million (Phase 2B), construction cost for Phase 3 is TBD.

South Sacramento Streams Flood Damage Reduction Project - Florin Creek Channel Improvements, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Project (Task Order) Manager for the design of flood control features along a 1.1 mile long segment of Florin Creek, preparation of a Design Document Report (DDR), identification of needed utility relocations, and determination of needed rights-of-way and temporary construction easement limits. Depending upon the location, the project included channel widening and deeping, construction of a concrete lining, installation of floodwalls and sheet piles (upstream of Persimmon Ave.), modification of the bridge at and construction of new maintenance access roads/ramps. Also managed design support during construction. The completed project together a detention basin adjacent constructed at the same time as the same time provided 100-year flood project to nearby residential properties. Design Fee: $632,412, Construction Support: $42,000 (obligated); Construction Cost: $7,182,211 Site 18A Culvert Replacement Project, Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, CA - Project (Task Order) Manager for the design and preparation of Plans, Specifications & Estimate for a project to improve the outflow from a 17 acre detention basin adjacent to Steelhead Creek. Following periods of high flow in the creek migrating fish often became trapped as water drained from the basin. The project involved replacement a 30-inch RCP culvert at Basin 18A with an approximately 120-footwide by 7-foot-high steel plate arch culvert at the inlet/outlet to the basin and some regarding of the basin to facilitate drainage to Steelhead Creek, reduce ponding issues, and improve fish passage from Basin 18A. Construction Cost: $672,602. 374
Stephen Hawkins – Page 2
American River Common Features, Levee Improvements, Site L9, USACE Sacramento District, Sacramento, CA - Project Manager for the design associated with closing a 148-foot “window” in a previously constructed slurry cutoff wall, using the jet grout method, along the centerline of the levee crest. Responsibilities included preparation of plans, specifications & estimates for the jet grout cutoff wall, utility coordination, and coordination of the joint submission between MGE and another firm that designed an adjacent jet grout wall. Construction Cost: $2.5M.

American River Common Features (ARCF) Natomas Basin Reach H & D Levees, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Task Order Manager for the project that involves improvements to the windows left in the Natomas Basin Reach D levees and removal of two pumping stations, relocation of the outfall pipes for Pumping Plant 4, and installing a cutoff wall to close the gaps at each of these sites. The levee will also be enlarged to match the existing levee on each side of these gaps, and the Vestal Drain will be relocated. Also tasked with Independent Technical Review of levee improvements along the Natomas Basin Reach H portion of the project. Scope includes completion Plans & Specifications, DDR, Cost Estimate, Engineering Considerations, Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP). Design Fee: $281,404.77.

Mid Valley Levee Rehabilitation Project, Phase III Area 3, Sites 9, 10, 11, USACE Sacramento District, Yolo County, CA - Task Order Manager. This project involved design of slurry cutoff walls that will mitigate under and through seepage of the levee. The construction methods used were soil bentonite slurry and soil cement bentonite deep cutoff walls. Responsible for project management, design and preparation of the plans & specifications.

St. Jude to Venice Levee System, USACE New Orleans District, New Orleans, LA. Task Manager. This project involved Periodic Inspection of the 70-mile St. Jude to Venice ring levee system, which included a major floodgate structure. The work included preparation of the Periodic Inspection Report, coordinating the input from two inspection teams (one for the Mississippi River Levee and one for the Gulf Levee) and a structures inspection team to develop the final inspection recommendation to USACE and deliver the Official Outbrief to the New Orleans District USACE staff.

Pajaro River Sheet Pile Floodwall Evaluation Study, Santa Cruz, CA. MGE Project Manager. The purpose of the Pajaro River Sheet Pile Evaluation Project is to develop an order of magnitude cost to install sheet pile along both banks of the Pajaro River and Salsipuedes Creek to contain up to 100-year flood flows. Responsible for overseeing the hydraulic analysis of the River/Creek system to determine water surface elevations for 25, 50 and 100-year recurrence events, preparation of plans and details related to the alignment of the sheet pile wall, determination of lateral sheet pile loads and coordinating with the County's geotechnical engineer to determine sheet pile tip elevations, and preparation of the cost estimate.

Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District “On-Call” Contract - Project Civil Engineer and Construction Support team leader. Project involved design of improvements to the Eden Landing Pump Station. The 35-year old pump station was completely rehabilitated and included replacement of natural gas pump engines with variable frequency electric controls. Responsibilities include: Field investigation and measurements, review of existing As-Built and repair drawings, evaluation of operational conditions; underground discharge line inspection; and preparation of PS&E for the civil engineering portion of the pump station rehabilitation. Mr. Hawkins was MGE’s lead civil engineer to provide engineering support during construction including reviewing contractor submittals, participating in construction progress meetings, recommending design revisions to resolve conflicts from unforeseen conditions, and responding to contractor initiated RFI’s.

In addition, he provided construction management for the addition of electric controls and rehabilitation of a storm water pump station. Management duties involved response to Requests for Information (RFI), interpretation of specifications, dissemination and review of all project submittals, monitoring the construction schedule to ensure on-time construction, support to the County’s inspectors and resolution of construction conflicts. The project construction cost is $2.7 million.

Harney Lane across North Paddy Creek Bridge Scour Countermeasures, San Joaquin County - Supervising engineer.

The 84-foot-long, 3-span, cast-in-place, concrete slab bridge is listed as scour critical by Caltrans and the foundations are determined to be unstable for calculated scour conditions. Piers are supported by standard cast-in-place, 16-inch pile extensions, founded on spread footings. The streambed has been classified as having highly erodible material and the potential calculated scour elevation is lower than the allowable limits for the existing foundation.

Oxidation Ponds Decommissioning Project, Sacramento International Airport (SMF), CA - Project manager for preparation of reports, field reconnaissance and surveys, preparation of PS&E, and preparation of a Pond Closure Report following construction. The existing sewage oxidation ponds were removed from service, resulting in pond closure. The pond closure plan calls for: excavation and removal and disposal of biosolids, sludge deposits, and pond sidewall rock at a Class II disposal. The ponds will subsequently be backfilled with on-site stockpile material, graded to drain, and revegetated/stabilized for erosion and sediment control.
375
Proposal for Yolo Bypass Levee Project Design Services

BRADLEY REICHEL, PE
Lead Civil Engineer Years Experience: 9
Education (Degree and Specialization) Professional Registration MS/Civil Engineering - Water Resources Planning & Mgt/2011 BS/Civil Engineering/2009
2012/Civil Engineering/CA #80306
2014/Civil Engineering/CO #0048480
2018/Civil Engineering/TX #130217
2018/Civil Engineering/WA #56747
Key Qualifications
Mr. Reichel has experience in applied hydraulic system design; engineering applications of GIS and GPS; environmental river mechanics; pipe system engineering and hydraulics; stream rehabilitation design; and urban stormwater manage¬ment. In addition, Mr. Reichel is highly proficient with ArcGIS, AutoCAD Civil 3D, EPA-NET, EPA-SWMM, HEC-RAS, HEC-6, HECHMS, HY-8, MATLAB, .NET Framework, and SpecsIntact. Mr. Reichel was a Graduate Research Assistant and Teaching Assistant responsible for preparation of reports for the EPA detailing water conservation and graywater reuse principles and scenarios; developing standalone application in VB.NET for simulation of sustainable urban water management practices.

Also instructed undergraduate students in principles of computational model design and engineering statistical analysis and developed lessons and materials for GIS course and conducted lectures and labs for undergraduate class.

Relevant Projects
Marysville Ring Levee Rehabilitation, Yuba River Basin Flood Protection Project, Phase 2B and 3, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Lead Civil Engineer for design under (Contract W91238-10-D-0016 Task Order 12), completion of Plans & Specifications, Design Documentation Report (DDR), Engineering Considerations, and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP), and identification of needed utility relocations and utilities to be protected in place for Phase 2B of the Marysville Ring Levee (MRL). Phase 2B is the segment the right bank of the Yuba River (near the confluence of the Feather River and Yuba River), between State Route 70 and Simpson Lane. Phase 2B, which is 5,150 linear feet in length, includes strengthening a portion of the existing levee and the construction of two set-forward levees. The section of levee designed for strengthening is adjacent to the historic downtown Marysville and the culturally significant Bok Kai Temple. Levee improvements for Phase 2B include construction of a soil-bentonite cutoff wall along the existing and realigned levees, location and closure of abandoned historic sewer tunnels, relocation of utilities, improvement of landside and waterside patrol roads, and improvements to levee embankments including correction of bank slopes. Design challenges included the development of vibration monitoring measures to avoid damage to the historic Bok Kai temple during construction, the relocation of overhead utilities crossing the levee, determining the location of existing sheet pile walls, bridge abutments and other features that may interfere with the installation of the cutoff wall, excavation and location of the historic sewer tunnels that may cross the levee, and other cultural and environmental constraints. Upon completion of Phase 2B, MGE was issued a Task Order under Contract W912P7-16-D-0006 to complete the final design for Phase 3 which had been completed prepared by the USACE San Francisco District (SPN) to the 90% design level, and combine the final design packages for Phase 2B and 3 into a single package for advertising and award for construction. This required modification of the documentation prepared by MGE for Phase 2B to incorporate Phase 3. Phase 3 extended northeasterly begins at from the terminus of the Phase 2B cutoff wall and extends northeast approximately 9,700 linear feet. Reach 3 is proposed to be a deep mix method, soil cement bentonite wall. All deliverables were provided using AutoCAD Civil 3D, Microsoft Word, and SpecsIntact. Task Order Fees: $979,804.07. Estimated Construction Cost: $9.3 million (Phase 2B), construction cost for Phase 3 is TBD.

South Sacramento Streams Flood Damage Reduction Project - Florin Creek Channel Improvements, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Lead Civil Engineer for the design of flood control features along a 1.1 mile segment of Florin Creek from Franklin Boulevard to Highway 99, preparation of a Design Document Report (DDR), identification of needed utility relocations, and determination of needed rights-of-way and temporary construction easement limits. Depending upon the location, the project included channel widening and deepening, construction of a concrete lining, installation of floodwalls and sheet piles (upstream of Persimmon Ave.), modification of the bridge at and construction of new maintenance access roads/ramps. The completed project together a detention basin adjacent constructed at the same time as the same time provided 100-year flood project to nearby residential properties. Design Fee: $632,412, Construction Support: $42,000 (obligated); Construction Cost: $7,182,211
376
Bradley Reichel – Page 2
American River Common Features (ARCF) Natomas Basin Reach H & D Levees, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Civil Engineer performing design for a project that involves improvements to the windows left in the Natomas Basin Reach D levees and removal of two pumping stations, relocation of the outfall pipes for Pumping Plant 4, and installing a cutoff wall to close the gaps at each of these sites. The levee will also be enlarged to match the existing levee on each side of these gaps, and the Vestal Drain will be relocated. Also tasked with Independent Technical Review of levee improvements along the Natomas Basin Reach H portion of the project. Scope includes completion Plans & Specifications, DDR, Cost Estimate, Engineering Considerations, Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP). Task Order Fee: $281,404.77.

South Sacramento County Streams Flood Damage Reduction Project – Feasibility Studies, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Completed the hydrology/hydraulics analyses for 8 segments of 5 separate streams along South Sacramento County Creeks as part of the Feasibility Studies in support of the Post Authorized Change Report (PACR) for flood control features along the streams. Conducted thorough review of existing reports including DDR and LLR. Performed independent review of South Sac Streams HEC-RAS model and assisted with preparation of updated DDR. Task Order Fee: $577,556.76 Napa Creek Flood Control Project, Water Resources & Environmental Restoration, USACE, Napa, CA - Prepared the construction and environmental protection specifications for the project through multiple milestone stages using SpecsIntact.

The project included adding two concrete box culverts totaling 990 feet in length to function as bypasses during periods of high flow in Napa Creek. Each of the culverts have two 12 feet high by 11 feet wide cells. The project also included approximately 4,000 feet of creek channel improvements. The improvements included widening the channel where possible, removal of obstructions to flow, and the construction of overbank flood plain terraces, flood walls, berms, and hydraulic grade control structures to create riffles and pools. The creek channel modifications incorporated bio-engineered channel and bank treatments, in-water wood structures, 5 grade control structures, and habitat restoration. The DrChecks system was used for reviews and addressing comments received. Also assisted with providing design support during Construction Phase. Tasks included site visits, review of construction submittals, responding to requests for information (RFI's) submitted by the construction contractor, modeling for storm events during construction, and preparation of design revisions in support of contract modifications for work not associated with any errors and omissions. Design Phase Fee (Task Orders 3 & 4):
$2,577,917, Construction Phase Fee (Task Order 1): $596,582. Construction Cost: $18,529,849 St. Jude to Venice Levee System, USACE New Orleans District, New Orleans, LA. Civil Project Engineer. Performed analysis of GIS data during project close-out phase. GIS data was integrated into final reports and presentation for de-brief meeting with the USACE and Levee Safety Officer(s). Project involved levee safety Periodic Inspection (PI) on 70 miles of levees and floodwalls located along the west bank of the Mississippi River in the Buras Levee District and along the Gulf Coast of Louisiana.

Panther Creek Road Storm Damage Remediation Project, USDA Forest Service, El Dorado National Forest – Civil design and hydrology/hydraulics support for the project that involves the preliminary engineering and preparation of FHA, Federal Lands Highway Damage Survey Forms (DSR’s) for 7 storm damage sites caused by heavy rains in early 2017 along Panther Creek Road.

Jalama Road Storm Damage Repair, Santa Barbara County – Civil engineer responsible for hydrology/hydraulics and drainage system design for the repair of Jalama Road, as part of the effort to restore flood-damaged facilities. Design included repair of pavement displacements on the southbound (uphill) lane and replacement of the 30-inch CMP culvert that was displaced during the slide.

Pajaro River Sheet Pile Floodwall Evaluation Study, Santa Cruz, CA - Civil Project Engineer. Responsible for providing hydraulic analysis of the Pajaro river system to determine water surface elevations for 25, 50 and 100-year recurrence events.

Work included evaluation of past hydrologic and hydraulic modeling followed by preparation of revised HEC-RAS models to determine necessary improvements to prevent flooding. The project is located in the Pájaro River watershed on the Central Coast of California. The watershed is approximately 1,300 square miles and includes portions of Santa Clara, San Benito, Santa Cruz, and Monterey counties. The focus of the sheetpile evaluation is to determine the cost to protect the lower Pájaro River and its tributaries, Salsipuedes and Corralitos creeks. There are six significant reservoirs in the Pájaro River Basin, all of which were designed solely for water supply purposes.

Harney Lane across North Paddy Creek Bridge Scour Countermeasures, San Joaquin County – Lead Civil Engineer.

MARTIN MCILROY, PE, PG, CEG
Geotechnical Coordination Years Experience: 25
Education (Degree and Specialization) Professional Registration BS/Geology/1994 California - Civil Engineering #78846
California - Registered Geologist, #7435
California - Certified Engineering Geologist, #2322
Louisiana - Professional Geologist, #716
Publications/Committees
ICSE-6-2014, Paris, France, Scour at Unknown Foundations or What I did on my Summer Vacation; ICSE-7-2016, Perth, Australia Put on your hip boots a practical application of partially grouted rip rap.

ASCE-GI Geotechnics of Soil and Erosion; NCHRP-24-43 Panel Member; Relationship between Erodibility and Fundamental Geotechnical Properties of Geomaterials.

Key Qualifications
Mr. McIlroy has performed and managed geologic, engineering geology and foundation engineering studies for a wide variety of water resource projects. He has performed geotechnical services for the USACE on levee design and rehabilitation, cutoff wall design, seepage and stability analysis, channel improvements, floodwall design and construction, flood control works inspections and dam Independent Technical Review (ITR) projects. He has managed contracts with multi-million-dollar construction budgets and routinely develops Geotechnical Appendices to Design Documentation Reports (DDRs), input for Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFPs), performed ITR and worked within the Dr. Checks system to manage and resolve document comments from the USACE. He has managed Task Orders with budgets ranging from $50,000 to over $1.1 million.

Relevant Projects
Morrison Creek UPRR Floodwall and Levee, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Geotechnical Project Manager. Completed the foundation design of flood protection improvements along the UPRR from the confluence of Morrison Creek and Unionhouse Creek upstream approximately 3,300-feet to the existing UPRR trestle over Morrison Creek. Improvements included a 2,850- foot-long reinforced concrete floodwall, 930 feet of retaining walls, levee embankment sections, patrol road, drainage facilities, and utility relocations. Right of way constraints required CLSM below foundations for a reduced footprint and adequate bearing capacity. Scope of work included preparation of plans and specifications, Design Documentation Report, Geotechnical Appendix to DDR.

Mid-Valley Phase III Area 3, Levee Improvements, Right Bank Sacramento River, Sites 9,10,11 and EDR, USACE, Yolo County, CA - Geotechnical Project Manager – This USACE Sacramento District project consisted of developing designs for levee improvements along two 700-foot right bank segments of the Sacramento River (site 9 & 10) and a 5,650-foot right bank segment of the Sacramento River (site 11). Work consisted of surveying, geotechnical studies, evaluating through seepage and slope stability using SEEP/W and SLOPE/W, preparing final EDR for phase 3, preparing EDR level construction plans, Preparation of construction plans and specifications; Design Documentation Report (DDR); Geotechnical Appendix to DDR, utility relocations; right-of-way and temporary construction easement requirements; developed CEQA/NEPA documentation and acquired permits during the design process; Engineering Consideration Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) report, 60%, 90%, and 100% Design submittals, MCASES MII cost estimate; and Dr. Checks review of submittals. ACASS Rating “Very Good”.

Mid-Valley Area Phase III Area 3, Levee Improvements, Knights Landing Ridge Cut, Sites 12, 12A and 13, USACE, Yolo County, CA – Geotechnical Project Manager. An IDIQ Task Order for design of levee improvements along an 18,000 foot-long segment of the left bank of the Knights Landing Ridge Cut from approximately levee mile (LM) 2.8 to 5.0 (Site 12), LM 2.0 to 2.8 (Site 12A), LM 1.6 to 2.0 (Site 13), Near Knights Landing, California . As part of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project, the project design included levee seepage berms to control through seepage. The work included surveying, geotechnical review of existing data and tests; evaluation of seepage and slope stability using SEEP/W and SLOPE/W; preparation of construction plans and specifications; Design Documentation Report (DDR); utility relocations; right-of-way and temporary construction easement requirements; 11,600 l.f. of levee rehabilitation from embankment creep due to expansive soils; regraded/removed expansive soils and added non-expansive soil cap; performed seepage & stability analysis and 378
Martin McIlroy – Page 2
developed plans & specs for levee improvements; levee toe irrigation canals and through levee utilities were removed/relocated/ replaced; developed CEQA/NEPA documentation and acquired permits during the design process; Engineering Consideration Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) report, and a MCASES MII cost estimate; Dr. Checks review of submittals. ACASS Rating “Very Good”.

Levee Periodic Inspection (PI), Feather River-Sutter Basin Protection Area, USACE, Sutter and Butte Counties, CA - Independent Technical Review and QA. Levee Periodic Inspection of the Feather River-Sutter Basin Protection Area levee system for the USACE Levee Safety Program. The Levee system totals 70 miles, comprised of nine segments on the Feather River Right bank and Sutter Bypass east bank, protecting urban, rural and agricultural areas. Tasks included document and design criteria review, field inspection and rating of levee features and associated items with correlation to GIS database, preparation of draft and final PI reports, coordination with USACE representatives and out brief presentation to the USACE Levee Safety Officer (LSO) for final system evaluation. The Project was completed within the six (6) month performance period and within budget; despite significant challenges posed by January weather and short daylight hours, implementing the Beta level Levee Inspection System Software program, and changes in project requirements. The USACE performance evaluation noted “All key milestones were met on time and with high quality.” ACASS Rating “Very Good”.

East Weaver Creek Levee Re-evaluation, Weaverville, Trinity County, CA – Geotechnical Project Manager. Project involved development of a project scope for feasibility studies for Department of Water Resources (DWR) Grant Funding and brokered meetings with the County and DWR to develop project understanding, funding levels available and project schedule.

Levee re-evaluation for the East Weaver Creek left and right levees involves evaluation of the levee slope stability, freeboard, and inundation areas with the goal of re-certifying the levee and re-mapping the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Project also involved coordinating the hydrology/hydraulics, surveys and geotechnical studies for this preliminary re-evaluation.

American River Common Features and South Sacramento Streams Levee Projects, Reach H – USACE, Sacramento County, CA – Geotechnical Project Manager. The project consisted of geotechnical services and documentation support of the American River Common Feature General Reevaluation Report (GRR) focusing on refinement and evaluation of alternative plans. Taber Consultants produced a 2,250 page Geotechnical Appendix Data Report that covered approximately

5.2 miles of the American River Common Features Study Area. A total of 49 soil borings were logged and converted into gINT.

Over 2,200 lab tests were performed. Mr. McIlroy monitored CPT explorations, coordinated the laboratory testing and reporting and managed the personnel and resources to complete the task order. ACASS Rating: “Exceptional” Rio Hondo Upper 2 Levee System Periodic Inspection, USACE, Los Angeles County, CA – This project consisted of a Periodic Inspection for about 0.73 miles of levee. Team Leader for the levee inspection, including physically walking the levee alignment to document levee conditions. The PI report identifies areas of concern relative to data gaps, current design criteria, operations and maintenance, rated items, and safety issues. All deadlines have been met to date and a successful post-inspection out-brief of the project has been performed in Los Angeles with very few comments or changes by USACE.

ACASS Rating: “Very Good”
Florin Creek from Franklin Boulevard to Highway 99 (Section 2D1), USACE, Sacramento, CA – Geotechnical Project Manager. This project consisted of a geotechnical investigation and design services for over a mile of channel and floodwall improvements along Florin Creek in south Sacramento. Geotechnical services included exploration along the banks and in surrounding neighborhoods to gather subsurface information for stability and seepage analyses. Project also involved coordination of laboratory testing and geotechnical engineering analyses for a Geotechnical Appendix to the Design Documentation Report (DDR). Improvements included channel re-shaping and floodwall along parts of the eastern channel sections. Performed review services for plans and specifications for floodwall improvements.

Success Dam Existing Conduit Retrofit Independent Technical Review, USACE, Tulare County, CA – Geotechnical Project Manager. Completed Independent Technical Review (ITR) of the proposed retrofit design for the existing reinforced conduit downstream of the control tower. The primary objective of the project is to remove the current risk of dam failure during an earthquake due to liquefiable material that underlies the dam. A concrete shell design covering the existing 12-ft diameter conduit below Success Dam will reinforce and allow for the continued use of the existing conduit during construction of the new raised dam. The main geotechnical concerns during the review included capacity of proposed rock anchors, bearing and shear capacity of foundation materials, and hydrostatic uplift forces on the proposed shell. Taber Consultants provided preliminary foundation recommendations for the planned new outlet structure. Overall ACASS Rating: “Very Good”. 379
Proposal for Yolo Bypass Levee Project Design Services

DANNY VANG, PE, SE
Structures Design Support Years Experience: 25
Education (Degree and Specialization) Professional Registration BS/Civil Engineering/ 1994 2001/Civil Engineering/CA # 60613 2014/Structural Engineering/CA #6143
Key Qualifications
Mr. Vang recently rejoined MGE Engineering, Inc. He has experience in structural design and inspection of bridges and buildings including steel, concrete, and prestressed concrete structures. Mr. Vang’s experience also includes design, analysis, condition inspection and technical reports, shop drawings of structural steel and reinforced concrete buildings, bridges, roadways, foundations, retaining walls, sound barriers, and sign structures. Mr. Vang is experienced in MicroStation and AutoCAD applications.

Relevant Projects
2017 Winter Storm Damage Repair Projects, FEMA Disasters 4301 and 4308, Sierra County, CA - Independent Design Check for Retaining Walls associated with slides along Ridge Road. The project involved engineering design services for the permanent repair of storm damaged roadways at 12 sites. MGE’s scope includes field reviews to identify the cause of failure and an appropriate permanent repair, design, and plans, specifications & estimates (PS&E), obtaining environmental clearance and regulatory permits, and provide engineering support during construction.

South Sacramento Streams Morrison Creek UPRR Floodwall and Levee, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Design Engineer responsible for design of over 2800 feet of flood walls. Project involves flood protection improvements along the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) from the confluence of Morrison Creek and Unionhouse Creek upstream approximately 3,300-feet to the existing UPRR trestle over Morrison Creek. In addition to the walls, improvements also included new levee embankment sections, levee patrol road, drainage facilities, and utility relocations. Also provided construction support reviewing shop drawings, concrete mix design, revised designs due to change orders and responded to RFI’s Construction Cost:
$11,776,933.

Napa Creek Box Culverts and Flood Terrace Project, USACE, Napa, CA - Structural design for over 600 feet of flood protection retaining walls along Napa Creek as part of the project to increase hydraulic capacity and reduce flood potential.

The channel improvements will include re-grading approximately 2400 feet of the existing Napa Creek channel and the construction of flood walls at selected locations. Bypass box culverts will be constructed at two locations. Electronic Drawings are being furnished in MicroStation format. Review submittals are submitted electronically on-line through the DrChecks system. Design Phase Fee (Task Orders 3 & 4): $2,577,917, Construction Phase Fee (Task Order 1): $596,582, Construction Cost: $18,529,849.

South Sacramento County Streams Flood Damage Reduction Project – Unionhouse Creek, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Designed structural components associated with the Unionhouse Creek task order. This segment included both banks of Unionhouse Creek from Franklin Boulevard upstream to Center Parkway. Design was based on the recommended alternative developed to the 30% design stage by another firm. The design was a rectangular shaped reinforced concrete lined channel.

After delivery of 90% PS&E, DDR and ECIFP (Engineering Considerations and Information for Field Personnel), the USACE, SAFCA and DWR postponed completion of this project due to budgetary constraints and it was not constructed. Estimated construction cost was $11M.

Success Dam and Reservoir Seismic Remediation Project, USACE, Tulare County, CA - Structural design of a new chute, wingwalls and stilling basin. The 174-foot-long structure and its components are comprised of cast-in-placed reinforced concrete. The seismic remediation also includes a replacement or retrofit design of an existing reinforced concrete conduit, 12 foot inside diameter by 155 foot long section, which is a part of the outlet works under the existing dam embankment. It also includes structural design of a new 370 feet reinforced conduit extending from the end of the existing (retrofitted or replaced) conduit to the new stilling basin, as well as an extension of an existing 42-inch steel pipe. Design Fee: $491,349 General Instruction Building FY08, Presidio of Monterey, USACE, CA - Structural design for a 1,600-square-foot canopy covered pedestrian bridge that serves as access the second floor of the building from an adjacent parking area. Contract W91238-06-D-0010, Task Order #2. Construction Cost: $13,416,600 380
Proposal for Yolo Bypass Levee Project Design Services

JOHN HELM
CAD Technician Years Experience: 21
Education (Degree and Specialization) Professional Registration BS/Industrial Technology (Cum Laude) NA
Key Qualifications
Mr. Helm is an experienced AutoCAD designer specializing in the use of AutoCAD Land Development Desktop and Civil 3D.

He is proficient in roadway design, site grading and improvements, utility plans and utility relocation, plan and profile, erosion and storm water control plans and reports, as well as engineering construction documents.

Relevant Projects
Marysville Ring Levee Rehabilitation, Yuba River Basin Flood Protection Project, Phase 2B & 3, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Production of plans for the project(s). Phase 2B is the segment the right bank of the Yuba River and is 5,150 linear feet in length, includes strengthening a portion of the existing levee and the construction of two set-forward levees. Levee improvements for Phase 2B include construction of a soil-bentonite cutoff wall along the existing and realigned levees, location and closure of abandoned historic sewer tunnels, relocation of utilities, improvement of landside and waterside patrol roads, and improvements to levee embankments including correction of bank slopes. Upon completion of Phase 2B, MGE was tasked with completion of the final design for Phase 3, and combination of construction ready packages for Phase 2B and

3. This required modification of the plans prepared for Phase 2B to incorporate Phase 3. Phase 3 extended northeasterly begins at from the terminus of the Phase 2B cutoff wall and extends northeast approximately 9,700 linear feet. Reach 3 is proposed to be a deep mix method, soil cement bentonite wall. All deliverables were provided using AutoCAD Civil 3D. Est.

Construction Cost: $9.3M.

South Sacramento Streams Flood Damage Reduction Project - Florin Creek Channel Improvements, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Responsible for production of civil plans associated with the project the design of flood control features along a segment of Florin Creek from Franklin Boulevard to Highway 99, identification of relocations including utility relocations, and rights-of-way and temporary construction easement lines. Construction Cost: $7,182,211 BART Phase 1B Accessibility Improvements, Bay Area Rapid Transit Authority, Bay Area, CA - Responsible for production of all civil plans associated with the project that to replace non-ADA compliant curb ramps, linear ramps, and sidewalks within the ADA path of travel at the Castro Valley, Rockridge, Lafayette and North Berkeley BART stations. Tasks include development of civil plans including: curb ramps, sidewalks and linear ramps in conformance with Federal ADA and California Building Code require¬ments.

Site 18A Culvert Replacement Project, Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, CA - Civil design and drafting associated with the project that involves replacement of a 30-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe culvert, which is a fish passage barrier. The culvert was replaced with a larger culvert to facilitate drainage from the Natomas East Main Drainage Canal. In addition, the work also included limited grading to reduce ponding issues and improve drainage through the new culvert. Plans were produced in AutoCAD Civil3D.

American River Common Features, Natomas Basin Reach H and Reach D Windows, USACE, Sacramento, CA - Engineering technician responsible for production of plans for Reach D levee improvements. The project includes improvement to the windows left in the Natomas Basin Reach D levees and removal of two pumping stations, relocation of the outfall pipes for Pumping Plant 4, and installing a cutoff wall to close the gaps at each of these sites. The levee will also be enlarged to match the existing levee on each side of these gaps, and the Vestal Drain will be relocated. Project also included environmental restoration (temporary and permanent erosion control measures), and ground surveys at pump stations and erosion areas.

EVA Flight Training Academy Phase 1, Mather Airport, Rancho Cordova, CA - Responsible for production of civil plans associated with the development of an 8.8-acre site (site grading, flatwork, parking lots, access drives, drainage improvements and erosion control, sewer and water utilities, stormwater compliance, required fencing and other related items). The first phase involves improvements to an Office/ Classroom building, parking lot and T-shed canopies for aircraft storage. Plans were produced in AutoCAD Civil3D.
381

EDUCATION
 Sierra Nevada College, Incline Village, NV
Bachelor of Science, Business Administration, 1999

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND SOCIETIES
 Registered Civil Engineer, California License No. C086455  Member, American Society of Civil Engineers
 Member, Association of State Floodplain Managers
 Certified Floodplain Manager

EXPERIENCE
2019 to Present MBK Engineers, Sacramento, CA
Principal
Same experience in the area of Flood Management and District Engineering, with greater emphasis on the management and supervisory role of engineers and projects. 2016 – Present MBK Engineers, Sacramento, CA
Supervising Engineer
Same experience in the area of Flood Management, with greater emphasis on the management and supervisory role of engineers and projects. Also became District Engineer for several clients including Reclamation Districts 10, 70, 817, 1001, 1660, and 2103 as well as Yolo County Service Area No. 6 (Knights Landing) and Huffs Corner (Cache Creek).
2007 – Present MBK Engineers, Sacramento, CA
Project Manager
Program Manager for the Reclamation District 2103 Levee Rehabilitation Program; including planning, design, construction, operations and maintenance, DWR Proposition 1E grant management, certification, and FEMA remapping. Local Agency Project Manager for the Yuba River Basin General Re-Evaluation Report (GRR) including design and construction of the Marysville Ring Levee separable element.

Project Manager for the Feather River Regional Flood Management Plan develop0ment team and Regional Representative for the 2017 Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Update. Authors and Manages numerous DWR Grant Applications including the TRLIA Feather River Levee Repair and Upper Yuba River Levee Improvement Projects, the Reclamation District 2103 Bear River North Levee Rehabilitation Project, and the City of Oroville Local Levee Evaluation Project, the Dry Creek Feasibility Study and Yankee Slough Erosion Site design grant, and Small Community Flood Risk Reduction Feasibility Study Grants for the City of Wheatland, Nicolaus, Verona, and Rio Oso.

Provides coordination with Federal and State resource agencies for environmental consultation and permitting.

Works with local Reclamation Districts and agencies on flood control related issues, policies, and provides general engineering services to Reclamation Districts 10, 817, 1001, and 2103. 2005 – 2006 KB Home, Sacramento, CA
Senior Forward Planner
Responsible for due diligence and feasibility in land acquisitions, mapping, entitlements, environmental permitting, budgets, and permitting of various projects. Represented the Landowner Group in management of design, construction, permitting, and financing the Three Rivers levee Improvement Authority Program. 2003 – 2005 Morrison Homes, Sacramento, CA
Project Manager
Responsible for all aspects of various projects from land acquisition through project closeout. This work included due diligence and feasibility, budgets, mapping, entitlements, environmental permitting, design, construction, Storm Water Pollution Prevention, and project closeout. 2000 – 2003 Beazer Homes, Sacramento, CA
Assistant Superintendent
Managed various subcontractors in the construction of homes.

THOMAS ENGLER
382

EDUCATION
 California State University, Sacramento
BS in Civil Engineering, 1995
 California State University, Sacramento
MS in Civil Engineering, 2002

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES & SOCIETIES
 Registered Civil Engineer, California No. C058284
 Member, American Society of Civil Engineers

EXPERIENCE
1995 to Present MBK Engineers, Sacramento, CA
Principal
Principal Engineer in charge of hydraulic/hydrologic models for evaluation of flood control alternatives and development of design water surface elevation. Perform hydraulic/hydrologic analysis of flood problems and evaluation of flood control alternatives using HEC-RAS, RMA-2, FLO-2D, UNET, HEC-1.

EXPERIENCE HIGHLIGHTS
 Formulation, oversight and review of hydraulic analysis in support of alternatives evaluation and hydraulic impact analysis for widen of the Sacramento Weir (2019).  Hydraulic model development and re-calibration of a SRFCP hydraulic model in support of USACE WRDA 2016 projects.
 Develop 2D model and hydraulic analysis of the Yuba River Goldfields in support of a new levee south of the Yuba River Goldfields (2017-2019).
 Reconnaissance level hydraulic impact analysis in support of alternatives formulation for Little Egbert Tract Multi-Objective Project (2017).
 Prepare cumulative hydraulic impact analysis in support of Lower Sacramento River/Delta North regional flood control components (2017).
 Update hydraulic model of the North Delta region in support of the McCormack-Williamson Tract Levee Modification and Habitat Development Project and Sacramento County Point Pleasant FEMA Base Flood Elevation Study.
 Developed 2D model of the lower San Joaquin River and tributaries in support of hydraulic impact analysis of 1700 acres of habitat restoration at Dos Rios Ranch (2017).  Principal in charge of hydraulic analysis for the Lower Feather River Corridor Management Plan.  Evaluate hydraulic impacts of wetland restoration project on Cougar Wetlands using the North Delta HEC-RAS model.
 Evaluate hydraulic impacts using the North Delta HEC-RAS for the Cosumnes Mitigation Bank.  Evaluate hydraulic impact using RMA-2 for Liberty Island Conservation Bank on the Yolo Bypass.  Technical adviser for development of RMA-2 model of the Sutter Bypass for evaluation of vegetation management.
 Evaluate hydraulic impacts using RMA-2 for the Abbott Lakes Restoration Project on the Feather River. (2009)
 Evaluate hydraulic impacts using HEC-RAS of the Nelson Slough Restoration Project on the Feather River. (2009)Evaluate hydraulic impacts of wetlands restoration on the Sutter Bypass using HEC-RAS.

DON TRIEU
383

MICHAEL KYNETT

EDUCATION
 California State University, Sacramento
BS in Civil Engineering, 2007 Magna Cum Laude
PROFESSIONAL LICENSES and SOCIETIES
 Registered Civil Engineer, California License No. C077662

EXPERIENCE
2017 to Present MBK Engineers, Sacramento, CA
Engineer
Assists in the fields of flood control, hydrology, water resources planning, drainage, water supply, surveying, and levee maintenance. Assists with overall management of levee rehabilitation projects for various reclamation districts, including preliminary design, final design, state and federal regulatory coordination, quality control and contract administration. Assists with the coordination of supporting state, federal, and local agency requirements and criteria, to comply with state and federal programs for maintenance and rehabilitation projects, emergency response and recovery, and operations and maintenance planning and administration. 2009 – 2017 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento, CA Levee Safety Program Manager
Levee Safety Program Manager responsible for coordination, assignments, schedules, and overseeing the work performed by teams of engineers, scientists, and technicians to achieve the Levee Safety (LSP) and Inspection of Completed Works (ICW) programs. This includes providing program directives, budget and cost scheduling, developing management controls for quality control.

Senior (Geotechnical) Civil Engineer
Senior Engineer providing geotechnical engineering expertise associated with the implementation and administration of complex civil works (flood management), and military planning, design, and construction projects. Personally performed and developed geotechnical tasks and products. Responsible for coordination with various other disciplines (hydraulics, civil, cost, real estate, environmental, construction management. Briefed key USACE management officials (Section to Division Chiefs as well as touring national leaders) and representatives of other agencies, such as the California Department of Water Resources, SAFCA, WSAFCA, and SBFCA. 2007 – 2009 URS Corporation, Sacramento, CA
Graduate Engineer
Provided engineering support for the design, planning, and analyses of critical levees, civil infrastructure, and other geotechnical projects. Performed field inspections/investigations of levees for both surface and subsurface conditions, planned levee alignments, conducted geotechnical analyses of levees, designed levees, designed pavement rehabilitation, and aided in basic civil site surveying.

PUBLICATIONS
(Brossy, C., Wilson, J., Pearce, J., Sowers, J., Hunter, L., and Kynett, M., 2013). Re-Visiting and Revising the Quaternary Geology of the Lower American River, Cordilleran Section of The Geological Society of America and associated societies. Fresno, California 20–22. May 2013. (Ketchum, E., Perlea, M., Kynett, M., and Deus, A., 2011). Geotechnical Risk and Reliability Evaluation of the Levees Protecting the City of Sacramento, California. Geo-Frontiers 2011: pp. 3018-3028. (Kynett, M., Chowdhury, K., Millet, R., Perlea, M., Walberg, F., 2015). Improvements to Commonly Used Cutoff Wall Specifications, Deep Mixing. 2015.
384

EDUCATION
 University of California, Davis
MS in Civil Engineering, 1985 with emphasis in Water Resources  University of Santa Clara
BS in Civil Engineering, 1981

PROFESSIONAL LICENSES AND SOCIETIES
 Registered Civil Engineer, California License No. C040485  Member, American Society of Civil Engineers
 Member, Tau Beta Pi – National Engineering Honor Society

EXPERIENCE
1989 to Present MBK Engineers, Sacramento, CA
Supervising Civil Engineer
Supervise and perform hydrologic and hydraulic studies for flood control, floodplain, hydraulic impact, and levee design analysis. Experience with computer programs HEC-RAS, UNET, FLO-2D, FESWMS, RMA2. 1985 – 1989 California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, CA Civil Engineer
In the Central District California-Nevada Water Planning and Management Section, performed operations studies of the Truckee-Carson Rivers system using the Truckee-Carson Operation Model. Compiled and organized data and information for use in Truckee River negotiations.

In the Division of Planning, Hydrology, and Water Operations Section, Modified and maintained Department's planning simulation model, DWRSIM. Performed long-range planning studies. Used FORTRAN programming language, CYBER 720 computer, and Apollo workstations.

PROJECT HISTORY
 Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA): Development of hydraulic models of Sacramento River system to evaluate regional impacts of modifications to the Sacramento River Flood Control Project.

Development of hydraulic models and perform hydraulic analyses to determine design water surface elevations and support Urban Level of Protection findings for SAFCA levees.  West Sacramento Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA): Performed hydraulic analyses to determine design water surface elevation for the West Sacramento Levee Improvement Project. Performed hydraulic analyses to determine design water surface elevation and hydraulic impacts of the Southport Early Implementation Project.
 River Islands at Lathrop: Development of hydraulic model of lower San Joaquin River for the purpose of determining design water surface elevations and hydraulic impacts for the River Islands at Lathrop development project on Stewart Tract. Perform hydraulic analysis to support Urban Level of Protection finding.
 California DWR Central Valley Floodplain Evaluation and Delineation Project: Development and quality control review of HEC-RAS and FLO-2D hydraulic simulation models.  Central Valley Flood Protection Plan: External review of hydraulic models and analysis.  City of Oroville: Performed hydraulic analysis to determine 1% chance flood WSE for FEMA levee certification analysis.
 Sacramento County: Perform hydraulic analysis of Dry Creek with FESWMS 2D hydraulic model for FEMA Letter of Map Revision submittal.
 City of Woodland: Develop FLO-2D model of the lower Cache Creek floodplain, including the city of Woodland.
 Merced Irrigation District: Assist in planning, implementation, and accounting for water transfers.  San Joaquin River Group Authority: Lead Co-coordinator of the Hydrology subgroup of the San Joaquin River Technical Committee.

MICHAEL C. ARCHER
385

12. NAME 13. ROLE IN THIS CONTRACT

18. OTHER PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS (Publications, Organizations, Training, Awards, etc.) E. RESUMES OF KEY PERSONNEL PROPOSED FOR THIS CONTRACT
(Complete one Section E for each key person.)

14. YEARS EXPERIENCE
a. TOTAL b. WITH CURRENT FIRM

16. EDUCATION (Degree and Specialization) 17. CURRENT PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION (State and Discipline)

15. FIRM NAME AND LOCATION (City and State)
STANDARD FORM 330 (REV. 8/2016) PAGE 2
a.
b.
c.
d.
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State)
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
e.

Check if project performed with current firm
Check if project performed with current firm
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE (3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm
Check if project performed with current firm
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE

19. RELEVANT PROJECTS
(1) TITLE AND LOCATION (City and State) (2) YEAR COMPLETED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION (If applicable)
(2) YEAR COMPLETED
(3) BRIEF DESCRIPTION (Brief scope, size, cost, etc.) AND SPECIFIC ROLE Check if project performed with current firm 386

RESUME FOR WALLACE W BRASSFIELD, PE, CPE, CCE
Wallace W. Brassfield, PE, CPE
PMB 572
12042 SE Sunnyside Road
Clackamas, OR 97015
Phone: 503.658714
Cell: 503.817.2274
Email: [email protected]
SKILLS: Cost Estimating Heavy Civil Concrete and Earthwork Projects, Construction Management, Construction Mythology, Construction Modifications, Construction Equipment, Technical Review of Construction Documents. Skilled in application of Corps of Engineers estimating regulations and estimating software programs.

EDUCATION: BS Civil Engineering, University of Idaho 1963.

Several classes including construction law, federal procurement regulations, cost estimating regulations and processes and use of COE estimating software.

LICENSES/MEMBERSHIPS:

Registered Professional Engineer License, Washington State American Society of Professional Estimators, Certified Professional Estimator Certified Cost Engineer, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
American Society of Professional Estimators, membership.

MAJOR PROJECTS:

Delong Open Ocean Ore Loading Terminal and Channel Dredging Project located north of Arctic Circle about 150 miles north of Kotzebue Alaska.

COE Alaska District 2003 planning study. Include construction of 1500 LF pier and dredging of 2000 LF approach channel. Project valued about $260 million.

Columbia River Channel Dredging to deepen Columbia River from Portland Oregon to Pacific Ocean mouth at Astoria Oregon. COE Portland District 2003 planning study. First phase construction started in 2005. . About 150 miles of hopper, mechanical and pipe line dredging. Project valued about $150 million.

Oregon Cougar Dam outlet modification: Seismic upgrade and multi-level outlet addition to 300 foot high outlet. Also included concrete lining and valve installation inside an existing outlet tunnel. COE Portland District project located about 50 mile east of Eugene, Oregon. Construction completed in 2004. Project valued about $40 million.
387
Washington State Howard Hansen Dam new fish bypass and water outlet. New 150 foot high concrete outlet installed in the left bank of an existing dam. COE Seattle District project located East of Tacoma Washington. Construction started in 2004 and is not complete. Project valued about $60 million.

DOE Hanford, Washington Waste Vitrification Plant Cost-to-Complete 2005 estimate review. Design-Build project construction started in 2003 and is not complete.. Provided reviewed of the construction cost and project indirect costs for this $5 billion plus project.

Kansas Tuttle Dam repair foundation stabilization soil grouting project. COE Kansas City District located in central Kansas and construction started in 2004 and is not complete. Project valued about $100 million.

Elmendorf AB, Anchorage Alaska military hospital construction estimate quality control review. COE Alaska District construction completed 1999. Project valued about $250 million.

Columbia River Oregon Bonneville Dam second powerhouse and The Dalles Dam powerhouse major rehabilitation project estimates quality control reviews.

These COE Portland District projects are 25 miles and 80 miles East of Portland, Oregon. The Bonneville project is started construction in 1997 but is not complete and the “The Dalles” study was conducted in 1994. Projects valued about $150 million each.

Lead estimator for preparation of COE Walla Walla District government estimate for construction of Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Clarkston, Washington. Project was constructed in 1975. Project value in current dollars about $1 billion.

COE Walla Walla District 1997 Planning Study estimates for the unique construction removal of the four Snake River Dams in Washington. Project located along the Snake River from Pasco to Clarkston Washington. Performed quality control review and assistance on how to estimate the unique construction features. Projects valued about $1 billion.

Recent VE Study Team Support
The Dalles Navigation lower miter gate repairs - 2014
Lost Creek Dam power house fire protection upgrade- 2011 WORK EXPERIENCE:
388
Robert B. Lokteff, CE, GE
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
With BCI Since 1998
Education
 California State
University, Sacramento,
MS Civil Engineering
(Geotechnical
Concentration)
 California State
University, Sacramento,
BS Civil Engineering,
Registrations
 Professional Engineer,
Civil, CA #59558
 Professional Engineer,
Geotechnical, CA #2589
Affiliations
 CalGeo – California
Geotechnical Engineers
Association
 ASCE - American Society
of Civil Engineers
Mr. Lokteff is a Sr. Project Manager and Principal Geotechnical Engineer with Blackburn Consulting. He has over 29 years of geotechnical engineering experience in California with 20 of those years with Blackburn Consulting. He has a blend of geotechnical design, project management and construction management experience on levees, dams, bridges, roadways, pipelines, and water/waste water treatment facilities. Mr. Lokteff is a past President of the California Geotechnical Engineering Association (CalGeo), participates in the USACE Sacramento-area Geotechnical Levee Design/Construction Group and Slurry Wall Design Round Table, and was a presenter at the Geo Institute/Association of Engineering Geologists State-of-the-Practice Levee Symposium.

Representative Experience
WSAFCA’s Southport Early Implementation Project — West Sacramento, CA Geotechnical Engineer-of-Record for 7 miles of levee improvements along the Sacramento River west levee in the Southport area of West Sacramento. BCI completed over 100 subsurface explorations, extensive laboratory testing and engineering analysis, and prepared numerous reports and technical memoranda for the project. Provided conclusions and recommendations for potential borrow sites, underseepage mitigation, slope stability, and levee settlement. BCI provided quality assurance materials and laboratory testing during construction.

Southport Main Drain Pump Station — West Sacramento, CA Prepared a geotechnical report for replacement of West Sacramento’s South Port Main Drain Pump Station. The project consisted of the construction of a new 400,000 cubic foot concrete inlet structure, maintenance buildings, outlet pipes through an existing levee, and outfall structures. Recommendations for dewatering and excavation stability for cuts and fills of 25 feet were included in the report.

WSAFCA 2016 Levee Problems Identification and Alternatives Analysis — West Sacramento, CA
Principal-in-charge for BCI’s geotechnical problem identification and mitigation alternatives evaluation of over 20 miles of levee surrounding the City of West Sacramento. BCI evaluated existing studies by USACE, DWR, and other consultants, performed seepage and stability analysis for the Deep Water Ship Channel levee, and prepared Problem Identification and Alternatives Analysis Report to summarize findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

Lookout Slough Habitat Restoration Project — Solano County, CA Principal-in-Charge for the geotechnical design of a new flood control levee along the north and east boundaries of the Lookout Slough habitat area. The existing flood control levee will be breached to subject the area to tidal inundation. Levee design complies with subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and analysis criteria currently required by USACE and DWR.

RD 784 WPIC Levee Crack Evaluation – Yuba County, CA
Performed field evaluation, mapping, document review, and documentation of longitudinal cracks that developed along the crown of the RD 784 WP Interceptor Canal West Levee landside slope. Prepared a findings, conclusions and recommendations report for crack winterization, slope survey monitoring and additional investigation. Met with stakeholders to present findings and conclusions and obtain consensus for a path forward.

Geotechnical
Geo-Environmental
Forensics
Construction Services
389
Feather River West Levee Rehabilitation — Sutter County, CA Currently managing Blackburn Consulting’s geotechnical team in evaluating the southern portion of the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agencies 44 mile levee improvements from the Thermalito After bay south to the Sutter Bypass. To date, BCI has completed subsurface investigation, laboratory testing, engineering analysis and multiple reports containing recommendations for borrow sites, seepage mitigation and slope stability. BCI setup and maintained a USACE- certified laboratory at the project site to expedite laboratory analysis and turnaround time of results.

Star Bend Setback Levee — Sutter County, CA
Managed a subsurface investigation along the proposed levee alignment, laboratory testing and prepared a report containing geotechnical findings and design recommendations. Analysis included finite element seepage analysis, slope stability analysis and settlement analysis for the new levee. Report included recommendations for seepage mitigation options including a slurry cut-off wall, seepage berm and pressure relief wells in accordance with current US Corps of Engineers design criteria. The Star Bend Setback Levee project consists of about 3,600 lineal feet of new levee construction along the west side of the Feather River in Sutter County.

Mayberry Slough Setback Levee, Sherman Island — Sacramento County, CA Managed subsurface exploration (exploratory borings and down-hole vane shear testing), laboratory testing (including permeability, consolidation and triaxial shear) and engineering analysis. Prepared a Geotechnical Report that provided recommendations for design and construction of the proposed setback levee.

Recommendations included proposed slope inclinations, fill placement sequencing and waiting periods to mitigate detrimental pore pressure build-up and slope movement. Installed slope inclinometers and vibrating wire piezometers with data loggers to monitor slope movement and pore pressure build-up during construction. The Mayberry Slough Setback Levee project consisted of approximately 1.6 miles of levee upgrades including construction of landside setback levee and waterside slope flattening. Project challenges consisted of significant slope stability and settlement issues related to the peat and soft clay soil underlying the site. This stretch of levee had historic issues with slope movement and levee cracking.

American River Common Features, Natomas Basin Reach H — Natomas, CA Provided laboratory oversight on this USACE Project. Role included assistance in preparation of lab testing schedules, review of all test results for quality control, and overall management of all aspects of laboratory testing for the project. Tests include triaxial compression (UU and CU with pore pressure measurement), consolidation, hydraulic conductivity, Atterberg Limits, and sieve analyses.

Robert Lokteff
Resume Continued
390
Nicole C. Hart, PE
Project Manager/Senior Engineer
With BCI Since 2006
Education
 BS Civil Engineering
University of Arizona
 MS Civil Engineering
University of Arizona
Registrations
 Professional Engineer
Civil, CA #53289
Ms. Hart is a Project Manager/Senior Engineer with Blackburn Consulting. She has over 28 years of geotechnical engineering experience on flood control, residential, commercial, school, and infrastructure projects in the Northern California area. Her experience includes providing geotechnical recommendations for underseepage and slope stability evaluations of existing and new levees, seepage berms and cutoff walls, shallow and deep foundation design, retaining walls, pipelines, slope stability and landslide repair, pavement design, and expansive soil mitigation. Ms. Hart’s experience also includes Phase I and Phase II Environmental Studies which often include projects with soil and groundwater remediation.

Representative Experience
WSAFCA 2016 Levee Problem Identification and Alternatives Analysis — West Sacramento, CA
Served as a Senior Engineer during geotechnical problem identification and mitigation alternatives evaluation of over 20 miles of levee surrounding the City of West Sacramento. BCI evaluated existing studies by USACE, DWR, and other consultants, performed seepage and stability analysis for the Deep Water Ship Channel levee, and prepared a report to summarize findings.

WSAFCA Southport Early Implementation Project — West Sacramento, CA Nicole served as Project Manager/Senior Engineer for geotechnical design of approximately 6 miles of levee improvements along the Sacramento River West Levee in the West Sacramento Southport area. She coordinated subsurface exploration and laboratory testing programs, performed engineering analysis and developed conclusions and recommendations for underseepage and slope stability mitigation, levee settlement, borrow area evaluations, assisted in the development of plan and profile sheets and reviewed project plans and specifications. She then served as Senior Engineer through project construction, providing engineering recommendations as necessary and quality assurance oversight.

SBFCA Feather River West Levee Rehabilitation — Sutter and Butte Counties, CA Nicole performed geotechnical evaluation of the southern portion of the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency's 44-mile levee improvements from the Thermalito Afterbay south to the Sutter Bypass. She performed engineering analysis and provided documentation for multiple reports containing recommendations for borrow sites, seepage mitigation, and slope stability. For project areas B, C, and D, Nicole provided engineering support and review for BCI’s quality assurance materials testing services.

Lookout Slough Tidal Habitat Restoration and Levee Improvement Project — Solano County, CA
Nicole is serving as the Project Manager/Senior Engineer for the geotechnical design aspects of the Lookout Slough Tidal Habitat Restoration and Flood Improvement Project. She coordinated subsurface exploration and laboratory testing programs, performed engineering analysis and developed conclusions and recommendations for underseepage and slope stability mitigation, levee settlement, borrow area evaluations, assisted in the development of plan and profile sheets and reviewed project plans and specifications.

Geotechnical
Geo-Environmental
Forensics
Construction Services
391
Patrick Fischer, PE, CEG
Senior Engineering Geologist
With BCI Since 2001
Education
 California State
University, Sacramento
Post Graduate studies in
Soil Mechanics &
Foundation Engineering
 California State
University, Northridge
B.S. Geology
Registrations
 Professional Engineer,
CA #80392
 Professional Geologist,
CA #5599
 Certified Engineering
Geologist, CA #1739
Affiliations
 AEG - Association of
Engineering Geologists
 Geo Institute, an ASCE
organization for the GeoIndustry
 MCWRA – Mountain
Counties Water Resource
Association
Patrick Fischer is an Engineer and Engineering Geologist with Blackburn Consulting.

With over 30 years of experience in the geotechnical consulting field, his geotechnical and geologic engineering projects include soil, groundwater, and geologic studies for, roads, bridges, pipelines, treatment plants, dams, hospitals, schools, and commercial structures. He has extensive experience with evaluation of site seismicity and ground motion, liquefaction analysis, County and State roadway projects, shallow and deep foundations, pavement design, environmental engineering (Phase I/II Environmental Site Assessments), EIR/EIS input, and construction review and consultation.

Representative Experience
Thornton/Franklin Bridge Over Mokelumne River — Sacramento County, CA Project Manager for geotechnical investigation for bridge replacement over the Mokelumne River along Franklin Boulevard and Thornton Road Bridge. The project consists of replacement of approximately 300 feet of main-span and 2,000 feet of trestle. Recommendations provided for embankment grading and construction, abutment construction, driven piles for the trestle and bridge, and drilled shaft foundations for the main-span. Project considerations include scour, liquefaction, and levee stability.

Southport EIP Levee Improvements – West Sacramento, CA
Geotechnical investigation for Southport EIP Levee Improvements involving about seven miles of existing levee to mitigate slope instability and underseepage deficiencies. Completed a seismic analysis to evaluate the general seismic vulnerability of the Southport EIP levees. Determined site specific Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) and earthquake Magnitude (M), performed liquefaction triggering and settlement analysis, and analyzed post-earthquake levee stability.

Salt Marsh Restoration Recycled Water Pipeline — Napa & Sonoma County, CA Served as Project Manager and provided a Geotechnical Data Report and a Geotechnical Design report. The Napa-Sonoma Salt Marsh Restoration Recycled Water Pipeline is part of the North Bay Water Recycling Program, which is to provide recycled water for urban, environmental and agricultural uses. The project requires design and construction of approximately 37,000 linear feet of new 18-inch to 24- inch recycled water pipeline. The alignment includes three Directionally Drilled creek crossing and two Jack and Bore locations at railroad crossings.

PCGID/PID Anadromous Fish Screen — Glenn County, CA
Senior Engineering Geologist for geotechnical investigation for a new intake on the Sacramento River. Completed as part of a water resource development project, which required a new pump station, canal rehabilitation, and tunneling beneath a highway and levee for intake pipe installation.

Auburn Dam Site Channel Reconstruction & Intake Facility — Auburn, CA Project Manager and Engineering Geologist for geotechnical/geologic investigations for reconstruction of the American River channel at the old Auburn Dam Site. This is a joint project between the Bureau of Reclamation and PCWA. The project includes reconstruction (grading, placement of riprap, and subsurface cutoffs) of approximately 1.5 mi of river channel, design and construction of new intake facilities for Placer County Water Agency (PCWA), and closure of the dam diversion tunnel.

Geologic conditions were evaluated and reported. Recommendations were provided for excavation and fill placement, construction of structures, rock slope stability, rock bolting, and foundation design.

Geotechnical
Geo-Environmental
Forensics
Construction Services 392
Hydrology | Hydraulics | Geomorphology | Design | Field Services 2544 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 | 916.231.6052 | CBECOENG.COM Education
PhD., 1999, Hydraulics, specializing in 3-D numerical
modeling of environmental flows related to run-of-the
-river hydropower. Nottingham Trent University, England CIWEM, 1995, Water and Environmental Management
Diploma, Nottingham Trent University, England
B. Eng., 1995, Civil Engineering (First Class with Honors), Nottingham Trent University, England
HND, 1989, Engineering Surveying, Trent Polytechnic,
Nottingham, England
Professional Registration
2010, Professional Civil Engineer, California, #76898
Professional Experience
cbec, inc., eco-engineering, West Sacramento, CA,
Managing Director / Ecoengineer, 2007-present
Philip Williams & Associates (PWA), Ltd., Sacramento,
CA, Hydrologist to Principal, 1998-2007
Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, England
Standard Instructor: Land Surveying, I.T., and Fluid
Mechanics, 1995-1998
National Rivers Authority, Scarrington Road, Nottingham, England, Flood Defense Technician, 1995
National Rivers Authority, Scarrington Road, Nottingham, England, Assistant Flood Defense Technician, 1994
G.F. Tomlinson & Sons Civil Engineering Contractors,
Derby, England, Site Engineer/Project Manager,
1989-1993
Dr. Bowles is a Civil Engineer specializing in hydraulics, hydrology, geomorphology, water resources, water quality and environmental restoration. He has more than twenty-five years of project management experience on a wide variety of large multi-disciplinary, multi-stakeholder projects such as floodplain restoration, sediment studies, watershed hydrology, water quality, river and wetland restoration in California, Nevada, Washington, Oregon, and Florida, and overseas, including projects in the UK and Central America. Twenty of these years have been spent in practice in the US. His technical expertise spans the range of hydraulic and hydrologic modeling (HEC software and a wide variety of 1D, 2D and 3D hydraulic models), geomorphology, GIS and field data collection (topographic and bathymetric surveying, water quality monitoring, flow gauging and sediment transport measurements). Prior to specializing in environmental hydrology, Dr. Bowles worked initially as a land surveyor and latterly as a site construction supervisor.

Dr. Bowles founded cbec, inc., eco-engineering in 2007, specializing in engineering services as they relate to the water resources industry to provide ecologically sensitive and sustainable solutions in the fields of hydraulics, hydrology, geomorphology and restoration design. Since 1998 he has managed or directed numerous projects in northern California (Central Valley, the Bay Area and Coastal Regions) the Sierra Nevada (the Tahoe Basin) and southern California. Clients have included Federal, State, and local agencies and private client such as West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA), Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA), Yolo County, Solano County Water Agency, Solano Land Trust, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), US Fish and Wildlife Service, the Sacramento Water Forum, Department of Water Resources, Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and many other Cities and Counties in California. Other clients that Dr. Bowles has served include local private developers in the Central Valley, where his involvement has primarily involved advising clients on hydromodification impacts of new development (assessing the impacts of stormwater flows on the geomorphology of receiving waters).

His experience in other areas of the United States is extensive, including multiple projects in Oregon, Washington, Florida, Georgia and Indiana. Dr. Bowles has worked in the United Kingdom and other parts of Europe for over 25 years and co-founded cbec UK in 2010.

Dr. Bowles regularly gives training courses in hydraulics and hydrology and has prepared and delivered courses to the State Water Resources Control Board (and the Regional Boards), CDFW and UC Davis Extension. He has had lecturing experience in several fields including land surveying, IT, hydraulics and hydrology. He has also presented technical papers at numerous conferences and meetings and regularly gives technical presentations to Clients and Stakeholders in his project management and direction roles.

Dr. Bowles has had significant field reconnaissance and assessment experience including bathymetric surveying, flow and tide measurement, and velocity measurement using the latest technology in Acoustic Doppler Velocimetry and water quality monitoring. His knowledge of laboratory based hydraulic modeling is also extensive with a substantial part of his doctoral research based on this technology.

Dr. Bowles is focused on providing innovative, environmentally sensitive solutions to impacted watersheds from the Sierras to the Central Valley to achieve the protection, enhancement, and restoration of water dependent ecosystems. He has particular interests in multi-objective floodplain management and innovative urban development that is sensitive to, and sustainable for, our natural water resources systems.

SELECTED PROJECTS
Lower American River Current Conditions DEM and 2D Model Development, American River, CA
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency and the Sacramento Water Forum, 2017-present
Project director for creating a current conditions DEM using airborne bathymetric LiDAR and boat-based sonar and a 2D hydrodynamic model for the full lower American River. The project will support bank erosion analyses for levee protection and inform habitat suitability and restoration planning.

Little Egbert Multi-Objective Project, Yolo and Solano Counties, CA Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2016-present
Under contract with Wood Rogers, cbec is assisting MBK Engineers, ICF and Dave Sills in the initial development of a feasibility study for Little Egbert Tract.

The overarching goal is to achieve flood risk reduction and habitat restoration benefits while creating a more sustainable landscape for agriculture. The team defined draft project objectives and setting in terms of its physical, flood, and agricultural functions, identified opportunities and constraints, and developed early project concepts. As part of the project, cbec interviewed the land manager and toured the farming operations, developed potential restoration alternatives in collaboration with the team, prepared grading volumes to support a rough construction cost estimate, and performed tidal and flood screening level modeling to inform benefits and impacts to habitat, agriculture, and water quality.

Dr. Bowles serves as project director.

Sacramento River East Levee Erosion Control Design, Sacramento, CA Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2014-2017
This project involves repair of levee erosion due to waves and fluvial processes. An erosion site assessment, bathymetric data analysis, and single beam sonar surveying were performed as a basis for design work. Riprap revetment design was required, as well as biotechnical bank stabilization measures that incorporate habitat enhancing features. The project included a study of features of recent erosion repair sites to improve upon and optimize habitat enhancements included in project designs.

Elkhorn Concepts Formulation, Yolo County, CA
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2014-2015
Project director for concept development and feasibility assessment effort to expand the Yolo Bypass into the Elkhorn. Oversaw hydrologic and hydraulic analyses to characterize potential floodplain habitat for juvenile salmonids.

Efforts included assessing depth, duration, frequency, and timing of inundation and conducting a HEC-EFM (Ecosystem Function Model) analysis of extendedduration inundation during ecologically critical time periods.

Southport Early Implementation Plan, West Sacramento, CA West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) (teamed with HDR Engineering), 2011-present
Dr. Bowles is the Project Director for this effort concerning the geomorphic design of the proposed levee setback project through the City of West Sacramento. Studies have included a riprap assessment and erosion site identification and prioritization on almost 6 miles of levee, detailed 2D sediment transport modeling, levee breach analysis, extensive bathymetric, side scan sonar, sub-bottom profiling and sediment transport measurements. The project has included substantial erosion control designs along the Sacramento River to address various site-specific concerns. This project required extensive research into current, successful riverbank restoration designs, as well as application of regulatory guidance. This project involves working collaboratively with a design team and several regulatory agencies to develop sustainable solutions. Erosion repair and prevention designs included biotechnical stabilizations, as well as ripirap design, based on 2D hydraulic modeling data. cbec also incorporated engineered large wood structures to provide aquatic habitat as part of the levee setback floodplain design.

Southport Restoration Design Project, West Sacramento, CA West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (teamed with GEI Consultants), 2017-present
cbec worked with a team on this restoration design project to create riparian, perennial marsh and floodplain habitats that accommodate compatible public recreation for 150 acres of restored floodplain. The design has reduced habitat fragmentation, spatial/temporal losses, provides ecological uplift, and incorporates a watershed scale approach by combining ecosystem enhancement with flood protection. Ecological and physical design criteria were established to ensure that the creation of high-value habitat is maximized, species benefiting from restoration are maximized and the design observes constraints of the Southport Project. cbec determined what ecological flows are required to support habitat enhancements for targeted endangered species (fall run Chinook Salmon and steelhead) and evaluated a 2D hydrodynamic model to better understand the inundation regime to inform restoration planting and erosion control on the restored floodplain. In addition, cbec designed large wood structures to improve refuge habitat for rearing salmonids on the restored floodplain. Chris served as project director.

North Sacramento Streams Evaluation and Levee Repair Project, Sacramento, CA
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (teamed with AECOM), 2014-2017
Dr. Bowles is the Project Director for this EIR for levee improvement projects in the northern regions of Sacramento. cbec has been involved in many aspects of this project, providing field services and analysis to support hydrology, hydraulics and geomorpholygy components of mitigation and restoration design. In this portion of the project, cbec performed a field reconnaissance to identify erosion sites along approximately 0.3 miles of Robla Creek. Based on field observations, evaluation of flow velocity, and water levels, cbec characterized the severity of erosion at the identified sites and prioritized them for repair. cbec developed grading plans for erosion repair site that included habitat enhancements to riparian and wetland habitat types to satisfy mitigation needs. Dr. Bowles was the project director and oversaw field reconnaissance and erosion severity evaluation.

Upper Yolo Bypass Locally Developed Plan, Yolo and Solano Counties, CA
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2014-present
This project aims to prepare a locally developed plan or alternative that meets the salmonid habitat and fish passage goals for the Yolo Bypass Project while being sensitive to other Yolo Bypass land uses. Conceptualization of the plan elements has occurred with substantial support from stakeholders and local agencies. The alternative includes managed floodplain inundation to amplify rearing habitat benefits and provide opportunities for food web production and export to the Delta based on the basic elements of a passive intake channel at Fremont Weir, operable weirs within Tule Canal to manage water levels within each management unit, and enhanced agricultural berms to control water levels within each management unit.
394
Hydrology | Hydraulics | Geomorphology | Design | Field Services 2544 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 | 916.231.6052 | CBECOENG.COM Education
MS, 2003, Biological and Agricultural Engineering,
University of Idaho, Moscow, ID
BS, 1998, Agricultural Engineering (summa cum laude),
University of Idaho, Moscow, ID
Professional Registration
1999, Engineer-in-Training, Idaho, #4896
Professional Experience
cbec, inc., eco-engineering, West Sacramento, CA,
Director / Ecohydrologist, 2008-present
Philip Williams and Associates (PWA), Ltd., Sacramento, CA, Hydrologist to Senior Associate, 2001-2008
Chris Campbell has more than eighteen years of engineering and project management experience with an emphasis in ecohydraulics and ecohydrology. He specializes in hydrodynamics, physical hydrology, sediment transport, geomorphology, water resources, and ecosystem restoration. As a Director at cbec, Chris applies his technical experience in numerical modeling and field studies to projects ranging from seasonal wetlands to lowland alluvial rivers to tidally influenced rivers and estuaries. Chris directs and provides quality control for 1D, 2D, and 3D numerical modeling using a range of public and proprietary software packages (e.g., HEC-RAS, MIKE 11/21, TUFLOW, Delft3D, FLOW-3D, FEFLOW). Chris also directs and performs a range of field studies to include topographic and bathymetric surveying, water quality monitoring, climate monitoring, flow gauging, sediment characterization, and sediment transport sampling.

Chris Campbell has worked on a range of ecosystem restoration projects with an emphasis on vernal pool restoration in the Sacramento Valley and tidal wetland and floodplain habitat restoration in the Yolo Bypass, Cache Slough Complex, and North Delta. Chris has been the principal investigator of a vernal pool research project since 2008 to understand the potential hydrologic impacts of constructed pools on natural pools to inform design standards for vernal pool creation. This has involved four years of monitoring and subsequent 3D vadose zone modeling. Chris has also been working in the Yolo Bypass for more than a decade on various data collection, restoration, and mitigation projects. These include field data collection efforts to support hydrodynamic model development; hydrodynamic model development, calibration, and alternatives evaluation for the USBR/DWR Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project EIS/EIR; realignment of Putah Creek through the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area; tidal restoration projects in the southern Yolo Bypass such as the Lower Yolo Ranch Tidal Restoration Project and the Yolo Flyway Farms Restoration Project; hydrodynamic modeling and design support of various mitigation banking projects throughout the Yolo Bypass to include Fremont Landing Conservation Bank (constructed), Capital Conservation and Mitigation Bank, Liberty Island Conservation Bank (constructed), and North Delta Fish Conservation Bank; identification and prioritization of drainage and infrastructure issues within the Yolo Bypass; and contributions to land management plans for the Yolo Bypass Wildlife Area and the Liberty Island Ecological Reserve.

Chris has also been working in the North Delta for more than a decade on a range of tidal habitat restoration projects that include McCormack-Williamson Tract Levee Modification and Habitat Development Project, Little Egbert Multi-Objective Project, Decker Island Habitat Restoration Project, and Prospect Island Tidal Restoration Project.

SELECTED PROJECTS
Little Egbert Multi-Objective Project, Yolo and Solano Counties, CA Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2016-present
Under contract with Wood Rogers, cbec is assisting MBK Engineers, ICF and Dave Sills in the initial development of a feasibility study for Little Egbert Tract. The overarching goal is to achieve flood risk reduction and habitat restoration benefits while creating a more sustainable landscape for agriculture. The team defined draft project objectives and setting in terms of its physical, flood, and agricultural functions, identified opportunities and constraints, and developed early project concepts. Tasks performed consisted of: conducting single-beam bathymetric surveys to verify changes in bed topography after flooding, interviewing the land manager and tour of the farming operations, developing potential restoration alternatives in collaboration with the team, preparing grading volumes to support a rough construction cost estimate, and performing tidal and flood screening level modeling to inform benefits and impacts to habitat, agriculture, and water quality.

Chris Campbell, MS
Director / Ecohydrologist
395
2544 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 | 916.231.6052 | CBECOENG.COM

SELECTED PROJECTS (CONTINUED)
Hydrology | Hydraulics | Geomorphology | Design | Field Services that were also used to inform subsequent agricultural economic impact and fish benefits analyses. As project manager for cbec, and using his extensive knowledge of the Yolo Bypass, Chris directed the detailed TUFLOW model development and calibration, developed the long-term hydrology, collected missing bathymetric data, prepared preliminary gate designs for the alternatives, and supported the team by presenting the alternative outcomes (ongoing).

Feather River Levee Setback Project, Yuba County, CA
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority, 2005-2007
Project hydrologist for this levee setback project on the Feather River, responsible for the geomorphic assessment of the proposed levee setback and the physical process elements of the environmental enhancement of the setback area.

Bear River Levee Setback Project, Yuba County, CA
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority, 2005-2007
Project hydrologist for this levee setback project on the Bear River, responsible for the geomorphic assessment of the proposed levee setback and the physical process elements of the environmental enhancement of the setback area.

Dry Creek Habitat Enhancement Project, Sonoma County, CA Sonoma County Water Agency, 2013-present
This project will enhance up to 6 miles of Dry Creek below Warm Springs Dam through creation of in-channel and off-channel habitats to improve summer rearing and winter high-flow refuge for coho salmon and steelhead trout. Design elements include alcoves and side channels, in-channel riffle enhancement, large wood structures, biotechnical stabilization measures, and native revegetation.

Working with Inter-Fluve, Inc., cbec supported the development of channel designs by performing detailed field surveys of the low flow channel and conducting 2D hydrodynamic model development and calibration using TUFLOW to evaluate the performance of the design features from low flows through the 100-year flood. Chris directed the surveys and hydrodynamic modeling.

Ardenwood Creek Restoration and Flood Control Project, Alameda County, CA
Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, 2013-present
The goal of this project is to improve flood protection to urban areas adjacent to Ardenwood Creek as well as enhance the habitat function of the creek in the urban areas and through the Coyote Hills Regional Park. Working with NewFields, cbec developed a 1D/2D hydrodynamic model of Ardenwood Creek and the Alameda County Flood Control Channel based on the MIKE FLOOD platform to evaluate the performance of the preferred channel design. Chris was the project manager for this effort.

Oroville Wildlife Area Flood Stage Reduction Project, Butte County, CA Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency, 2014
This project consists of weir improvements and associated ecosystem restoration in order to improve the connectivity of the Feather River to its historic floodway and reduce stages within the main channel. cbec conducted a reconnaissance level geomorphic assessment along 8 miles of the Feather River corridor in the vicinity of the Oroville Wildlife Area D-Unit with the goal to develop a better understanding of potential project related impacts to the local sediment regime and water quality within the study reach. Chris was the project director for this effort.

Lower American River - Sunrise Side Channel Design and PostProject Performance Monitoring, Sacramento, CA Water Forum and Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2005-present The project objective is to reintroduce more frequent flows to a side channel on the American River to enhance steelhead spawning habitat. Responsibilities as PM include collecting baseline hydraulic data, calibrating a 2D (MIKE 21) hydrodynamic model, and assessing the geomorphic performance and sustainability of the conceptual alternatives using the calibrated hydraulic model.

Restoration of Clifton’s Drain in Geothe Park, Sacramento County, CA Sacramento County Regional Parks and Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2006-2007
The purpose of this project is to develop a multi-objective restoration design for the site, to the satisfaction of all stakeholders, which considers channel restoration, elderberry bush mitigation, and organic farming. Responsibilities as PM to date include preliminary hydraulic modeling using MIKE 11 and a soils analysis.

Urrutia Pond Restoration, Sacramento, CA
Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency and City of Sacramento, 2008-2012
Worked as a project hydrologist as part of a team preparing the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (SMARA) reclamation and restoration plan for the Urrutia Pond in the Lower American River Parkway.

Yolo Bypass Salmonid Habitat Restoration and Fish Passage Project, Yolo and Solano Counties, CA
California Department of Water Resources and US Bureau of Reclamation, 2013-present
In support of the US Bureau of Reclamation and California Department of Water Resources Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report, this project aims to develop a preferred alternative to meet the Reasonable and Prudent Alternative actions set forth in the National Marine Fisheries Service’s Biological Opinion for creating floodplain habitat for juvenile salmonids and improving fish passage within the Yolo Bypass. Working with HDR, Inc. to evaluate the alternatives, a detailed 1D/2D hydrodynamic model based on the TUFLOW platform was developed, calibrated, and applied. The efficacy of multiple alternatives were evaluated over 16-year simulation period based on the hydrodynamic outcomes 396
Hydrology | Hydraulics | Geomorphology | Design | Field Services 2544 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 | 916.231.6052 | CBECOENG.COM Education
BS, 2009, Civil Engineering with an emphasis in Water
Resources Engineering, California State University,
Chico, CA
Computer Aided Drafting Certificate, 2007, Computer
Aided Drafting Certificate Program, Butte Community
College
Professional Registration
2014, Professional Civil Engineer, CA, #82637
Professional Experience
cbec, inc., eco-engineering, West Sacramento, CA
Ecoengineer, 2010-present
Saunders Custom Construction, Paradise, CA,
Drafting/Invasive Aquatic Plant Removal, 2010
Domenichelli and Associates, El Dorado Hills, CA, Water Resources Intern, 2007
Published Articles
“Little River Poses Big Challenge for Large Dam Rehab
Project”, Point of Beginning Magazine
Mr. Taber is a registered California PE with over eight years of experience specializing in ecohydraulics and ecohydrology. He acts as both a staff eco-engineer as well as field services manager for projects related to habitat enhancement, floodplain management, hydraulic and hydrologic modeling, tidal and estuarine ecosystems, surface and ground water quality and aquatic infrastructure. Mr. Taber is an expert CAD and GIS user and has extensive experience in mapping, design, and drafting. Much of his work includes open channel hydraulic modeling (1- and 2-D) to inform design or analysis of habitat and floodplain elements. Additionally, Mr.

Taber is well versed in construction related projects by working closely with stakeholders and contractors to provide professional oversight during active construction to ensure proper interpretation of design intent. Mr. Taber has been involved with numerous projects from start to finish which include; existing conditions data collection, 3-dimensional surfacing, hydraulic modeling, design, drafting, construction documentation and specifications, bid support, construction staking, construction oversight, as-built surveying and project reporting. His role as cbec’s Field Services Manager provides the basis for quality projects by utilizing cutting edge methods and technology to effectively collect quality data. His expertise includes many aspects of field data collection including: topographic surveying, bathymetric surveying, sediment sampling, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) data collection (including elevation data through structure from motion), Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) data collection, water quality sensing and hydrography including; stream gaging, depth and temperature sensing, and Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) data collection for velocity and flow.

SELECTED PROJECTS
Southport Sacramento River Levee Setback Hydraulic and Geomorphic Assessment, Sacramento, CA
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, 2011
Ben collected groundwater piezometer and stream gauge data, as well as performed sediment sampling and discharge measurements in support of the two-dimensional hydrodynamic / sediment transport model for a levee setback project on the Sacramento River. This project involves an impact analysis for selected development design alternatives and development of floodplain restoration alternatives and erosion control measures.

Dry Creek Habitat Enhancement Project, Sonoma County, CA Sonoma County Water Agency, 2014
This project enhanced up to 6 miles of Dry Creek below Warm Springs Dam through creation of in-channel and off-channel habitats to improve summer rearing and winter high-flow refuge for coho salmon and steelhead trout. Design elements included alcoves and side channels, in-channel riffle enhancement, large wood structures, biotechnical stabilization measures, and native revegetation. Working with Inter-Fluve, Inc., cbec supported the development of channel designs by performing detailed field topographic surveys of the low flow channel and conducting 2D hydrodynamic model development and calibration using TUFLOW to evaluate the performance of the design features from low flows through the 100-year flood. Ben led the bathymetric surveying field effort utilizing our Hydrone remote controlled survey platform. His work on the project was selected to be featured in “Point of Beginning”, an internationally distributed surveying magazine.

Cypress Avenue South Side Channel Restoration and Enhancement Project, Redding, CA Western Shasta Resource Conservation District, 2017-present The purpose of the project is to increase and improve Chinook Salmon and steelhead spawning and rearing habitat by replenishing spawning gravel and establishing additional side-channel habitat. The need for the action derives from the declines of naturally spawned salmonid stocks due in part to loss of spawning and rearing habitat through curtailment of gravel recruitment due to blockage of the river channel by dams and the alteration in flow patterns. Specific emphasis is on the endangered winterrun Chinook salmon, which primarily spawns in the upper reaches of the mainstem Sacramento River during the months of April through August. Fry and smolts emigrate downstream from July through March through the Sacramento River, reaching the Delta from September through June. cbec is responsible for Ben Taber, BS, PE
Ecoengineer
397
2544 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 | 916.231.6052 | CBECOENG.COM

SELECTED PROJECTS (CONTINUED)
Hydrology | Hydraulics | Geomorphology | Design | Field Services feasibility, design, permitting support, and has used UAS for data collection efforts.

The project is ongoing and cbec is responsible for feasibility, design and permitting support. Ben managed the project and led topographic and bathymetric surveys to support modeling and design.

Lower American River Salmonid Habitat Improvement
Project-2015/2016, Sacramento Bar Restoration, Sacramento, CA Water Forum, US Bureau of Reclamation and US Fish & Wildlife Service, 2015
Part of a multi-year gravel placement and side channel creation project to improve spawning and rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead on the Lower American River. The 2015 site is located on Sacramento Bar and construction is expected to be completed in the fall of 2016. The site consists of a ~1,400 ft side channel, ~700 ft of constructed spawning riffle and bulk floodplain grading to provide margin habitat at a range of flows. Ben has a key role as the project engineer for the project. His tasks include site topographic surveys (existing and as-built topography), 2D Hydraulic modeling, habitat suitability modeling (spawning and juvenile rearing), shields stress mobility analysis, design, drafting, construction site layout / staking, construction oversight and reporting for the project. cbec implemented a highly efficient UAS workflow to track stockpile sorting operations and project progress by developing high resolution orthomosic images and DEM’s periodically during the construction and as-built survey phase.

Lower American River Salmonid Habitat Improvement Project-2014, Nimbus Basin Restoration, Sacramento, CA
Water Forum, US Bureau of Reclamation and US Fish & Wildlife Service, 2014
Part of a multi-year gravel placement and side channel creation project to improve spawning and rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead on the Lower American River. The 2014 site is located Nimbus Basin and construction was completed in the fall of 2014. The site consists of a ~900 ft side channel, ~600 ft of constructed spawning riffle and bulk floodplain grading to provide margin habitat at a range of flows. Ben had a key role as the project engineer for the project. His tasks included site surveying (existing and as-built topography), 2d Hydraulic modeling, habitat suitability modeling (spawning and juvenile rearing), shields stress mobility analysis, design, drafting, construction site layout / staking, construction oversight and reporting for the project. UAS technology was used to create DEM difference maps during construction to track grading and stockpile quantities.

Cordova Creek Naturalization Project, Sacramento, CA
Sacramento Water Forum, 2013-2017
Ben was a designer on this award-winning urban stream rehabilitation project that returned ecological function to an urban area while addressing channel erosion. Floodplain restoration was a major focus of the project; lowering the banks to reconnect the creek to its overbank areas and revegetating to provide benefits for habitat and flood management.

The project involved geomorphic analysis, floodplain restoration, and biotechnical bank stabilization and grade control on a system with highly erosive soils and increased flows due to a hydromodified watershed. Specific tasks included riprap design, particle transport analysis and design compliance and quality control services during construction. In addition to traditional ground surveys, post construction monitoring was conducted via an unmanned aerial systems (UAS) technology to monitor plant health and vegetation recruitment.

Arcade Creek Park and Preserve, Citrus Heights, CA
Foothill Associates, 2012-2014
Ben was field lead and designer involved in an urban stream restoration that is a part of the City’s plan to revitalize and open up a deteriorated natural corridor to public use. Biotechnical streambank stabilization techniques and inset floodplain terrace designs were implemented to restore three priority sites along Arcade Creek. The project also required scour analysis, 2D modeling, and riprap design to protect abutments of two new pedestrian bridges. Ben’s work included performing topographic surveys, site design and plan drafting.

Bangor, Hood Canal Mitigation. Seabeck, Washington - Quilcene, Washington, Big Quilcene River, Big Beef Creek
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Northwest, 2011
cbec is part of a multidiscipline, multiagency, environmental restoration effort in the Hood Canal region of Washington state. Ben lead numerous field tasks including: ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) discharge and velocity measurements, multiple sediment sampling events consisting of bed load, suspended sediment and grab sampling, bathymetric surveying, and total station channel surveying. Ben also was involved with installing multiple gages to monitor parameters such as water level, temperature, turbidity, and salinity. This total of this data is currently being used by cbec modelers to produce and verify highly accurate 2D and 3D hydrodynamic models of Big Quilcene River, Big Beef Creek, and the greater Hood Canal. With Ben’s on the ground experience with the site, he played a key role in development of the digital terrain model on the Big Quilcene River. Datasets from LIDAR, terrestrial ground surveys, channel single-beam bathymetry, and delta/bay multibeam bathymetry were all used to create this surface.

Butano Creek Floodplain Restoration Design, Pescadero, CA Resource Conservation District of San Mateo County, 2015 A floodplain restoration design effort to restore channel and floodplain habitat by installing a series of engineered log jams, log and rock grade control structures and floodplain access channels. Implementation of the project will restore natural function to the creek, reduce incision of the creek bed and erosion of its banks, restore wetland habitat, restore the floodplain’s ability to store sediment, help address water quality impairment from sediment, create and enhance off-stream habitat, and enhance ecological values for multiple federal and state listed species.

The project includes topographic surveys, 2D hydrodynamic modeling, sediment transport modeling, and structure design. Topographic surveys included detailed cross section surveys spaced every 200 ft for 1.5 miles of stream channel, which included characterizing berm crown elevations, and more detailed 3-D surveys of subsets of the reach. Ben led the fieldwork effort as well as assisted in the 2D model development and restoration design.
398
Hydrology | Hydraulics | Geomorphology | Design | Field Services 2544 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 | 916.231.6052 | CBECOENG.COM Education
BS, 1998, Biological Resources Engineering,
Cooperative Education Program-Civil Engineering,
University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Professional Registration
2005, Professional Civil Engineer, California, #68217
2013, CPESC, California #00007473
2015, QSP/QSD, California #C68217
Professional Experience
cbec, inc., eco-engineering, West Sacramento, CA,
Senior Ecoengineer, 2009-present
Kleinschmidt Associates, Grass Valley, CA, Senior
Engineer, 2008-2009
Kennedy/Jenks Consultants, Sacramento, CA, Project
Engineer, 2005-2008
Creegan + D’Angelo Engineers, Fairfield, CA, Project
Engineer, 2004-2005
Nelson Engineering, Jackson, WY, Design Engineer,
2002-2004
Park Engineering, Jackson, WY, Design Engineer,
2000-2001
Charles P. Johnson & Associates, Silver Spring, MD,
Design Engineer, 1993-1998
Mr. Diaz is a registered California Professional Engineer with eighteen years of experience that covers a wide range of civil engineering projects. He has worked on projects related to land development, water and wastewater treatment and infrastructure, water resources management and planning, and hydroelectric generation. He has been involved in all aspects of the projects, from planning and scheduling, to permitting, design and preparation of construction documents, cost opinions and reports, and construction monitoring. In his work, Mr. Diaz has interacted with municipalities, water, wastewater and irrigation districts and private developers and planning and federal regulatory agencies.

Currently, Mr. Diaz is involved in several restoration projects. These projects vary in application and include optimizing erosion control measures for habitat value on the banks of a large, leveed river, designing biotechnical bank stabilization measures for an urban drainage, restoring ecological function to an urban drainage through channel rerouting and redesign, and increasing the habitat value of river and tidal environments through floodplain reconnection. Many of his projects have included salmonid habitat enhancement as a goal of riverbank and floodplain restoration. The majority of Mr. Diaz’s work involves hydraulic modeling (1-D and 2-D) to inform design of sustainable stream and floodplain improvements, to increase habitat value, and to create multi-objective solutions.

Mr. Diaz is an expert CAD user, and has extensive construction document preparation experience. He is experienced in creating designs and producing construction documents. He is an experienced GIS operator, and is particularly informed on the interface between CAD and GIS. Mr. Diaz is familiar with a variety of hydraulic modeling software packages, including several open channel flow, and piped flow analysis programs. In addition to his current riverine hydraulic analysis work, he has performed hydraulic modeling to evaluate stormwater conveyance and treatment designs for a variety of development projects. He has performed hydraulic analyses to aid in designing both gravity and pressurized piping systems.

Mr. Diaz has experience with a diversity of construction projects, ranging from large scale projects such as municipal wastewater treatment plant improvements, residential and commercial developments to small scale projects such as private home sites and microhydroelectric developments on water and wastewater conveyances. He has been involved in reservoir sedimentation projects in the Sierra foothills and has developed plans for removing sediment and reducing future sedimentation. Mr. Diaz has provided client support during project construction in oversight roles on utility installation, roadway construction and site development projects. As a result, he is very effective at communicating design intent and details in construction documents. In addition to his design experience, he has extensive field experience in surveying. He has led survey crews for topographic data collection, construction staking and inspection. He is experienced using RTK GPS equipment on foot and aboard small watercraft, and using boat-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiling equipment. Mr. Diaz aims to gain a thorough understanding of his clients’ goals, as well as the issues and science that influence his projects in order to create sustainable and informed solutions.

SELECTED PROJECTS
Sacramento River East Levee Erosion Control Design, Sacramento, CA Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (teamed with GEI Consultants), 2014-2017 This project involved repair of levee erosion due to waves and fluvial processes and restoring floodplain habitat on the river bank. An erosion site assessment, bathymetric data analysis and single beam sonar surveying were performed as a basis for design work. Design of riprap revetment was required, as Sam Diaz, PE, CPESC, QSP/QSD
Senior Ecoengineer
399
2544 INDUSTRIAL BLVD, WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 | 916.231.6052 | CBECOENG.COM Hydrology | Hydraulics | Geomorphology | Design | Field Services

SELECTED PROJECTS
flows due to a hydromodified watershed. Specific tasks included riprap design, particle transport analysis and design compliance and quality control services during construction. In addition to traditional ground surveys, post construction monitoring was conducted via an unmanned aerial systems (UAS) technology to monitor plant health and vegetation recruitment.

Bank Protection Working Group, Sacramento, CA
Lower American River Task Force, 2016-present
The Bank Protection Working Group (BPWG) is a collaborative collective of professionals in the water resources industry with the mission of helping advise, plan, design, and implement bank protection features along the lower American River. A primary goal of the BPWG is to support federal, state, and local efforts to provide the highest level of flood protection for the surrounding community and the conservation of irreplaceable natural resources along the American River Parkway. Various members of the cbec staff have participated in this sharing of knowledge. Sam led an in-depth field investigation and study that reviewed design elements of several erosion repair sites on the Sacramento and Lower American River to improve habitat value of bank repairs. The study evaluated the relationship between design features and geometry and the ability to support vegetation that provides shaded riverine aquatic (SRA) habitat with a goal of identifying and improving on past successes and eliminating design flaws and poor practices. The findings of the study have been used to prepare bank erosion repair designs that incorporate the most recent research and best available practices to efficiently enhance aquatic habitat value. In 2016, Sam presented the results of this study to the Working Group to further understanding of current design principles for bank repairs.

Lower American River Gravel Augmentation Plan, Sacramento, CA Water Forum, 2010-2011
Mr. Diaz developed CAD surface models to simulate the creation of a gravel bar in the Lower American River. He incorporated the surface models in a 2D hydraulic model (SRH2D) and evaluated and optimized them to create spawning habitat for Fall Run Chinook Salmon and Steelhead.

Lower American River Sunrise Side Channel Fisheries Enhancement Project, Lower American River, CA
Water Forum, 2009
Mr. Diaz assisted in collecting and analyzing field data to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing project, which aimed to reintroduce more frequent flows to a side channel on the American River to enhance steelhead spawning habitat. Data collection included bathymetric survey using acoustic Doppler current profiling, in-stream flow measurement, installing and managing data from pressure transducer readings, and RTK GPS surveying of the channel bottom and surrounding topography.

Arcade Creek Park and Preserve, Citrus Heights, CA
Foothill Associates, 2012-2014
Mr. Diaz managed design of an urban stream restoration that is a part of the City’s plan to revitalize a deteriorated natural corridor for public use. Inset floodplain terrace designs and biotechnical bank stabilization techniques that incorporated large wood were implemented at three priority restoration sites. The project also required scour analysis, 2D modeling, and riprap design to protect abutments of two new pedestrian bridges. Mr. Diaz provided construction oversight during installation of bank restoration and protection features. well as biotechnical bank stabilization measures that incorporate habitat enhancing features.Sam led a study that evaluated design elements of Sacramento and Lower Aerican River erosion repair sites and assessed their success at supporting vegetation and providing shaded riverine aquatic (SRA) habitat to inform repair designs. Sam is the manager and design lead for this project.

Southport Early Implementation Project, West Sacramento, CA West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (teamed with HDR), 2010-present
Mr. Diaz performed a riprap assessment, erosion site evaluation and prioritization for almost 6 miles of Sacramento River levees and offset floodplain areas. He designed erosion repairs to protect and restore habitat value at identified erosion sites. This project required extensive research into current, successful riverbank restoration designs, as well as application of local and federal regulatory guidance.

This project involved working collaboratively with a design team and several regulatory agencies to develop sustainable solutions and habitat enhancing designs. Erosion repair and prevention designs included biotechnical stabilizations and riprap design, both of which were based on 2D hydraulic modeling data.

Urrutia Property Bank Restoration Project, Sacramento, CA Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency and City of Sacramento, 2012 Mr. Diaz participated in design of a river bank restoration for a grant proposal that aimed to restore floodplain area to provide high quality salmonid spawning and rearing habitat near the mouth of the Lower American River. This project required working knowledge of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Standard Assessment Method (SAM) for habitat creation projects.

Cordova Creek Naturalization Project, Sacramento, CA
Sacramento Water Forum, 2013-2017
Mr. Diaz was project manager and designer for this award-winning urban stream rehabilitation project that returned ecological function to an urban area while addressing channel erosion. Floodplain restoration was a major focus of the project; lowering the banks to reconnect the creek to its overbank areas and revegetating to provide benefits for habitat and flood management. The project involved geomorphic analysis, floodplain restoration, and biotechnical bank stabilization and grade control on a system with highly erosive soils and increased 400
4 Scott Bryant, PLS
Project Technical Lead

REGISTRATION
1996/CA/Professional Land
Surveyor/#7228
2004/NV/Professional Land
Surveyor/#16767

EDUCATION
1991/BS/Surveying and
Photogrammetry/California State
University, Fresno

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
California Land Surveyors
Association
Society of American Military
Engineers
National Society of Professional
Surveyors

TRAINING
U.S. Air Force Reserves (Chief
Master Sergeant)

EXPERIENCE
With Psomas for 22 years; with
other firms for 7 years
Scott Bryant has 29 years of land surveying experience and is responsible for the successful completion of surveying related projects. His duties include client coordination, preparation and management of work plans, management of survey staff, project administration, quality assurance, and quality control.

Scott has successfully delivered projects that have included specific survey tasks such as: survey calculations, computer mapping in both AutoCAD Civil 3D and Microstation, writing legal descriptions, drafting exhibit maps, directing aerial photography, and aerial mapping operations. His experience also includes design surveys, boundary surveys, topographic surveys, high precision geodetic GPS surveys, survey adjustments, parcel maps, records of survey, construction staking, right-of-way base maps and appraisal maps, and lot line adjustments.

Experience
Department of Water Resources Emergency Levee Repairs – Various Sites, CA: Project Manager on multiple task orders to provide base mapping and real estate acquisition services on almost 100 levee repair sites throughout the Department of Water Resources (DWR) jurisdictional area. Currently providing control surveys; topographic surveys & mapping; boundary and right of way surveys; right of way engineering; aerial surveys using drones; bathymetric surveys; design basemapping and DWR-format appraisal exhibits in DWR’s Microstation format; and records of survey.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, American River Common Features Project, Sacramento District, CA: Technical Leader directing the establishment of primary control to Second Order, Class II specifications for 50+ miles of levee corridors in Sacramento. Services involved static GPS surveys, conventional surveys; precision digital leveling; CEPD compliance; and inclusion in USACE USMART control database. In addition, the project included QA/QC oversight for USACE on two consultants performing right-of-way inventory services for the levees and provided GIS consulting services in developing a GIS geodatabase for use by the right-of-way inventory consultants.

Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) Natomas Levee Improvement Program, Sacramento and Sutter Counties, CA: Task Manager for this levee project involving 42+ miles of State and Federal levees and County roads of the Natomas Basin. Services included establishing survey control to Second Order, Class II specifications; providing orthophotography; performing topographic surveys; 1”= 40’ base mapping with 1-foot contours, utility surveys; performing boundary surveys, analysis, and land net maps preparation; preparation of right-of-way strip maps, descriptions and exhibits for 200+ acquisitions and land transfers; construction survey support; monitoring; GIS database development, and eminent domain proceedings support.

Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) Open-End Contract for Surveying & Mapping, Sacramento and Sutter Counties, CA: Task Manager providing GPS, control surveys, topography surveys, aerial photography, and mapping. Also provided title and easement review, right-of-way field surveys, 401
5 Scott Bryant, PLS
(Continued)
right-of-way legal description and plat preparation, right-of-way acquisition coordination and support, hydrographic surveys, construction surveys, and as-built surveys for 30 miles of levees. Project sites include levees along Dry, Robla, Steelhead, and Arcade Creeks; Natomas Cross Canal; and portions of the Sacramento and American River systems.

City of Elk Grove On-Call Surveying Services, Elk Grove, CA: Task Manager responsible for surveying and mapping services provided on this contract, which included design topographic surveys and mapping; aerial control surveys; digital aerial orthophotography and mapping; boundary and right-ofway research, surveys, and analysis; right-of-way engineering; preparation of legal descriptions and plats; construction staking; research, field ties, re-setting, and filing corner records for monument preservation on construction projects; preparation and filing of records of survey; and setting benchmarks.

Sacramento Regional Transit General Engineering Support Services - Surveying/Right-of-Way Engineering, Sacramento, CA: Survey Manager responsible for surveying and right-of-way engineering for this on-call contract to provide services for Sacramento Regional Transit District capital improvement projects. Past projects have included surveying for signaling; space planning; architectural, structural, mechanical, and electrical design; bridge maintenance and construction inspections; signal design; overhead catenary design; submittal reviews; public relations; environmental studies; quantity calculations; design, right-of-way, and construction surveying; materials testing; corrosion design support; and program management.

Central Contra Costa Sanitation District - Project Control for Various Projects, Contra Costa County, CA: Project Manager for development of a high precision geodetic control network. Scott planned the execution of the GPS surveys, managed the field crews, planned and managed the vertical leveling portion of the project, adjusted the field data, and published the finished product for the District. The deliverable of this assignment served as the project control for various district projects.

City of Sacramento On-Call Surveying Services, Sacramento, CA: Project Manager provided on-call surveying services as needed. Completed over 22 miles of topographic surveying in a residential portion of the city for several water main replacement projects. Psomas surveyors used a combination of terrestrial and GPS data collection techniques. Inverts of drainage features and sanitary sewer structures were measured and included in the field note submittal. Services also included providing topographic survey data on extremely short notice for museum parking lot upgrades.

State of California, Department of General Services, Real Estate Services Division On-Call Survey Contract, Northern, CA: Task Manager for land survey and mapping services, including topographic surveys and mapping, boundary surveys, ALTA surveys, utility locations, legal descriptions, aerial control, due diligence surveys, bond descriptions, aerial photography, and photogrammetric mapping.
402
2 Daniel Forgey, PLS
Project Manager

REGISTRATION
2007/CA/Professional Land
Surveyor/#8303

EDUCATION
1997/BA/Geography/California
State University, Chico

PROFESSIONAL

AFFILIATIONS
California Land Surveyors
Association
Society of American Military
Engineers
International Right of Way
Association
American Public Works
Association

EXPERIENCE
With Psomas for 13 years; with
other firms for 9 years
Dan Forgey is a professional land surveyor with 22 years of surveying and mapping experience. Dan is a Project Manager responsible for coordination and execution of tasks that utilize his expertise in the following areas:
boundary and right-of-way resolutions including complex land net mapping for large scale public works projects; topographic design mapping; preparation of legal descriptions and plats; eminent domain exhibits/support; monitoring surveys; construction staking; and verification surveys. He is experienced in geodetic control surveys, utilities surveys, ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, and preparation and processing of records of survey and final maps.

Experience
West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA) Southport Early Implementation Program, West Sacramento, CA: Project Surveyor providing independent review of the work provided by two consultants on this project.

Performed verification surveys on portions of the project to evaluate accuracy of the data. Prepared a detailed report and met with the consultants and WSAFCA to recommend ways to bring the control, topographic mapping and right of way surveys into compliance with the state and federal requirements and to get both surveys on the same horizontal and vertical datums.

Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) Natomas Levee Improvement Program, Sacramento and Sutter Counties, CA: Project Manager for this levee project involving 42+ miles of State and Federal levees and County roads of the Natomas Basin. Services included establishing survey control to Second Order, Class II specifications; providing orthophotography; performing topographic surveys; 1”= 40’ base mapping with 1-foot contours, utility surveys; performing boundary surveys, analysis, and land net maps preparation; preparation of right-of-way strip maps, descriptions and exhibits for 200+ acquisitions and land transfers; construction survey support; monitoring; GIS database development, and eminent domain proceedings support.

Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (SAFCA) Levee Accreditation Program, Sacramento, CA: Project Manager 50+ miles of urban levees.

Provided design support services that included: establishing permanent survey control; design topographic base mapping; detail structure surveys; coordination with DWR on right-of-way surveys performed in MA-9 portion of the project; right-of-way strip mapping to provide details of ownership and rights; and easement evaluation services as requested by the design team and SAFCA.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, American River Common Features Project, Sacramento District, CA: Project Surveyor supporting the establishment of primary control to Second Order, Class II specifications for 50+ miles of levee corridors in Sacramento. Services involved static GPS surveys, conventional surveys; precision digital leveling; CEPD compliance; and inclusion in USACE USMART control database. In addition, the project included QA/QC oversight for USACE on two consultants performing right-of-way inventory services for the levees and provided GIS consulting services in developing a GIS geodatabase for use by the right-of-way inventory consultants. 403
3 Daniel Forgey, PLS
(Continued)
Regional San (SRCSD/SASD) On-Call Surveying Services, CA: Project Manager for this current on-call contract. Services include legal descriptions and plats, site surveys to facilitate property transfers between agencies, surveys to establish/delineate easement limits, property boundary surveys, sewer manhole surveys, surveys for lot merger, topographic and underground utility surveys.

South River Pump Station Flood Protection, West Sacramento, CA: Project Surveyor for this project to provide 100-year flood protection for the South River Pump Station. Services include control surveys, base mapping, boundary and right-of-way surveys, preparation of legal descriptions for the levee, access easements, tempoary construction easements, and borrow sites.

Prepared a record of survey to document the boundary resolutions performed, monumentation set, and the property acquired for the project. Surveys were based on NAD83, Zone 2 horizontal datum and NAVD88 vertical datum.

Natomas Central Mutual Water Company (NCMWC) Facility Program, Sutter and Sacramento Counties, CA: Survey Manager for this 2.5 mile earthen irrigation canal built to convey diverted water from the Sacramento River to support agriculture, development and habitat in the Natomas Basin. Services provided include; horizontal and vertical control network, utility relocation surveys, construction staking, settlement monitoring, verification and as-built surveys as well as legal descriptions and plats for easement acquisition and Lot Line Adjustment processing.

Beach Lake Levee Right of Way, Freeport, CA: Survey Manager responsible for extensive record research for the determination of land ownership and easement rights centered around a levee built by Army Corps of Engineers on property owned by SASD near Freeport. Because of our extensive experience in rural boundary surveys and easement location surveys, we were able to provide the boundary mapping and staking which played a key role in negotiating a solution which satisfied the needs of the stake holders. Psomas prepared a Record of Survey to establish a public record of the resolved boundaries.

Pritchard Lake Pumping Plant and Pumping Plant 2, Sacramento County, CA:

Survey Manager for this project involving the replacement of two pumping facilities situated next to one another on the Sacramento River. Involved the prepration of precision base mapping utilizing high-definition scanning technology and conventional surveys to provide accurate details of the site and facilities. Provided boundary and easement surveys and mapping as well as construction survey control for both projects.

The Plant Commercial Center, San Jose, CA: Project Surveyor responsible for the boundary survey and right-of-way surveys relating to this 55-acre in-fill commercial site in San Jose. Provided services involving surveys of a portion of SR 128, a major off-ramp, and a major arterial street. Prepared a final map for the project together with legal descriptions and plats for utilities and access.

Also prepared and processed a lot line adjustment for a “big box” tenant. 404
Design Quality Control Plan (DQCP)
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure Project
West Sacramento, California
Contract Number: W91238-21-D-0005
Task Order Number: W91238-25-F-0006
February 2025
405
Deliverable: Design Quality Control Plan
Project: FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
Client: United States Corps of Engineers
Location: West Sacramento, California
Contract No: W91238-21-D-0005
Task Order No: W91238-25-F-0006
Date: February 13, 2025
Prepared by: Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch Joint Venture
406
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District i
Table of Contents
Section 1 Project Description and Purpose .....................................................................................1-1 Section 2 Purpose and Scope of Design Quality Control Plan (DQCP) .........................................2-1

2.1 Purpose .................................................................................................................................................... 2-1

2.2 Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 2-1

2.3 Deliverables .............................................................................................................................................. 2-1

2.4 Customer Involvement .............................................................................................................................. 2-2

2.5 Unit of Measure ........................................................................................................................................ 2-3

2.6 Technical Criteria ...................................................................................................................................... 2-3

2.7 Horizontal and Vertical Datums ................................................................................................................ 2-4 Section 3 Quality Control Responsibilities.......................................................................................3-1 Section 4 Project Delivery Philosophy and Team Coordination.....................................................4-1

4.1 Project Delivery Philosophy ...................................................................................................................... 4-1

4.2 Team Coordination ................................................................................................................................... 4-1 Section 5 Quality Control Methods ...................................................................................................5-1

5.1 AE Design Quality Control Review of Work Products ............................................................................... 5-1

5.1.1 Checker ................................................................................................................................................ 5-2

5.1.2 Engineer of Record .............................................................................................................................. 5-2

5.1.3 Independent Technical Review ............................................................................................................ 5-3

5.1.4 Certification .......................................................................................................................................... 5-4

5.2 Calculations, Reports, and other Documents ........................................................................................... 5-4

5.3 Computer Assisted Calculation and Modeling .......................................................................................... 5-4

5.3.1 Computer Models ................................................................................................................................. 5-5

5.3.2 Calculation Aids (Excel, MathCad, etc.) ............................................................................................... 5-5

5.4 Specifications ........................................................................................................................................... 5-6

5.5 Drawings ................................................................................................................................................... 5-6

5.6 Reports ..................................................................................................................................................... 5-6

5.7 USACE Review ........................................................................................................................................ 5-7 Section 6 Project Delivery Team (PDT).............................................................................................6-1 Section 7 Design Schedule................................................................................................................7-1 Section 8 Records Maintenance........................................................................................................8-1 Section 9 Signatures ..........................................................................................................................9-1 407
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District ii
Appendices
Appendix A Government Points of Contact........................................................................................ A-1 Appendix B Project Delivery Team ...................................................................................................... B-1 Appendix C AE Design Quality Control Review Team ....................................................................... C-1 Statement of Completion of AE Quality Control Review (A-E) ............................................................................... C-2 Certification of Quality Control Review .................................................................................................................. C-2 Appendix D Design Schedule............................................................................................................... D-1 Tables
Table 9-1: Government Points of Contact .................................................................................................................. A-1 Table 9-2: Project Delivery Team ............................................................................................................................... B-1 Table 9-3: Design Quality Control Review Team ....................................................................................................... C-1 408
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 1-1
Section 1 Project Description and Purpose
• Task Order Number: W91238-25-F-0006
• Project Name: FY 24 Stone Lock Closure Structure Project • Project Location: West Sacramento, CA
• Project Description: Develop final design package for construction of the Stone Lock Closure Structure in West Sacramento, California, at the junction of the Sacramento River and the Sacramento Deep-Water Ship Channel.

The proposed Stone Lock project is a new permanent, reinforced concrete barrier across and within the existing lock structure. The objective is to provide design of the barrier structure, civil design features, localized hydraulic modeling for the new structure, and environmental support related to the design and construction services leading to a set of plans, specifications, and Design Documentation Report (DDR) for the Stone Lock Structure.

The initial conceptual development phase of the scope focuses on surveys, geotechnical investigation and the development of H&H models and conceptual design. Due to the nature and complexity of this portion of the West Sacramento Project, the Stone Lock Closure Structure requires considerable data collection and modeling to inform the final design. For this reason, USACE will work with the A-E to modify the scope based on the findings from the conceptual development phase in order to properly scope, estimate, and schedule out the final design work to be performed in future phases.

In the conceptual development phase, the A-E will collect survey data for the project extents, provide geotechnical investigations (borings, CPTs, etc.), and concept design, as well as other general data collection deemed necessary and agreed to by USACE-Sacramento District (SPK).

The A-E will model and confirm sizing of H&H, Geotechnical, Structural, Civil and other features for this project and complete all necessary ancillary work required to complete the concept design in accordance with USACE regulations, standards, and requirements. The design must connect to and provide a continuous flood control system between the existing levees located north and south of the Stone Lock project including accounting for any impacts of the design on the surrounding flood control system.

Following review of the conceptual design and validation of the estimated construction costs, the Government anticipates a subsequent modification to be negotiated, at a later time, for the followon final design phases to develop a final (100%) design and provide any construction phase services support that may be required for the project.
409
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 2-1
Section 2 Purpose and Scope of Design Quality Control Plan (DQCP)

2.1 Purpose
This DQCP outlines the professional expertise, technical criteria and technical review processes that will be used to produce a quality product satisfying technical, functional, legal, safety and environmental requirements.

2.2 Scope
The following factors have been considered in determining the scope of the quality control effort.

Risks inherent in the project:
• The project requires foundation designs that will be designed based on geotechnical parameters determined through extensive subsurface investigations. Reliable geotechnical data will be the basis of a stable and resilient design.
• The structure’s interface with the existing lock structure, adjacent utility, and other nearby features. • Potential discovery of unforeseen geological conditions, such as unexpected soil compositions or contamination.
• Dependence upon the accuracy of Government Furnished Information. • The deliverable dates for tasks and subtasks associated with each project milestone are interdependent. Consequently, any delay in one area may cause a cascading effect, impacting subsequent deliverables.
• Environmental considerations during both the field work and design, including understanding impacts on biological resources and compliance with environmental regulations and permits.

Consequences of a failure:
• Design submittals don’t meet contract requirements for the features of work outlined in the Statement of Work resulting in additional costs and constructability concerns. • Delays in project schedule due to scope adjustments and unforeseen complexities.

Delays push out subsequent phases and create funding constraints.

2.3 Deliverables
The main deliverables for this phase of the project include:
• Quality Control Plan
• Quality Control Certification and ITR Documentation (each design submittal) • Accident Prevention Plan
410
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 2-2
• Monthly progress / status reports (to be delivered by the 10th of each month) • OPSEC Verification
• E-verification documentation
• Project schedule – initial and updates every 60 calendar days • Calendar of meetings – initial and updates every 60 calendar days • Calendar of deliverables – initial and updates every 60 calendar days • Drawing list – initial and updates every 60 calendar days • Task Order Kickoff Meeting: Minutes
• Meeting agendas / notes (Geotechnical/Geology bi-weekly meetings; Hydrodynamics bi-weekly meetings; monthly status meetings); other technical meetings as required. • Design coordination meetings
• Topographical survey
• Bathymetric survey
• Utility Investigation Report
• Geotechnical investigation plan
• Laboratory testing plan (geotechnical investigation) and lab report • Draft and Final Geotechnical Data Report (GDR)
• Draft and Final Preliminary Geotechnical Basis of Design Memorandum (PGDM) • Draft Geotechnical Basis of Design Report (GBOD)
• Summary hydrodynamics and particle tracking report
• Final Conceptual Plans
• Final Conceptual Design Documentation Report (DDR)
• Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP)

2.4 Customer Involvement
The Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch Joint Venture (JV) Project Delivery Team will engage and involve appropriate USACE organizations, Non-Federal Sponsor (NFS), Federal agencies, and local utility & infrastructure agencies as needed, working through and with the USACE Project Manager and Government Technical Lead. This involvement is anticipated to include formal meetings and presentations, formal reviews, informal meetings and discussions, teleconferences, e-mails, and telephone conversations.

Customer involvement at all levels is vital to instill confidence that the customers’ needs are being addressed.

Government points of contact for the project are provided in Appendix A. The JV team will engage with USACE in monthly task order progress meetings and bi-weekly design progress meetings. Additionally, USACE will be invited to participate in bi-weekly A-E design package team meetings when required. These scheduled bi-weekly meetings do not preclude participation in other non-scheduled meetings and interactions (via email and/or phone) that will occur as needed. Engagement will also include on-site and virtual design review meetings as dictated by and defined within the scope of work. 411
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 2-3

2.5 Unit of Measure
The project will use the Imperial System (e.g., feet/inches).

2.6 Technical Criteria
Per the scope of work, a list of all codes, guides, and standards will be developed for each design package and submitted to the Government for approval. The technical criteria to be used for this project include:
● ECB 2023-9, Civil Works Design Milestone Checklists
● ER 1110-2-1302, Civil Works Cost Engineering
● ER 1110-1-12, Engineering and Design Quality Management ● ER 1110-1-1807, Drilling in Earth Embankment Dams and Levees ● ER 1110-2-401, Operation, Maintenance, Repair, and Rehabilitation Manual for Projects and Separable Elements Managed by Project Sponsors
● ER 1110-2-1150, Engineering and Design for Civil Works Projects ● ER 1110-2-1302, Civil Works Cost Engineering
● ER 1110-2-1405, Hydraulic Desing for Local Flood Risk Management Projects ● ER 1110-2-1806, Earthquake Analysis, Evaluation, and Design for Civil Works Projects ● ER 1110-2-8160, Engineering and Design Policies for Referencing Project Elevation Grades to Nationwide Vertical Datums
● ER 1165-2-217, Civil Works Review Policy
● EM 1110-1-1005 Engineering and Design: Control and Topographic Surveying ● EC 1110-2-6065 Engineering and Design Comprehensive Evaluation of Project Datums ● EM 385-1-1, Safety and Occupational Health Requirements ● EM 1110-2-1610, Hydraulic Design of Lock Culvert Valves ● EM 1110-1-1804, Geotechnical Investigations
● EM 1110-1-1904, Settlement Analysis
● EM 1110-1-1905, Bearing Capacity
● EM 1110-1-2909, Geospatial Data and Systems
● EM 1110-2-1601, Hydraulic Design of Flood Control Channels ● EM 1110-2-1901, Seepage Analysis and Control for Dams ● EM 1110-2-1902, Slope Stability
● EM 1110-2-1906, Laboratory Soils Testing
● EM 1110-2-1913, Design and Construction of Levees
● EM 1110-2-2000, Standard Practice for Concrete for Civil Works Structures ● EM 1110-2-2100, Stability of Concrete Structures
● EM 1110-2-2102, Water Stops and Other Preformed Joint Materials for Civil Works Structures 412
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 2-4
● EM 1110-2-2104, Strength Design for Reinforced Concrete Hydraulic Structures ● EM 1110-2-2106, Pile Foundations
● EM 1110-2-2107, Design of Hydraulic Steel Structures
● EM1110-2-2714, Cathodic Protection Systems for Civil Works Structures ● EM 1110-2-2902, Conduits, Culverts, and Pipes
● EM 1110-2-6053, Earthquake Design and Evaluation of Concrete Hydraulic Structures ● ERDC/ITL TR-23-1 (2023) A/E/C Graphics Standard
● ERDC/ITL TR-19-17 (2019) A/E/C CAD Standard
● UFC 1-300-02 Unified Facilities Guide Format Standard ● REFPL10L0 (Geotechnical Levee Practice SOP-03)
● Urban Levee Design Criteria [California Department of Water Resources (DWR)] A reference to guidance and specifications that must be used by the AE during the performance of the contract. May include provisions, guidance, specifications, and/or Government Furnished Materials (GFM). Architect-Engineer Guides are used for Army Corps projects and are generally provided as attachments referenced below and included as applicable:
● AE Guide General Requirements: Architectural-Engineer Guide General Information ● AE Guide 10%: Architectural-Engineer Guide 10% Design Submittals ● AE Guide 35%: Architectural-Engineer Guide 35% Design Submittals ● AE Guide 65%: Architectural-Engineer Guide 65% Design Submittals ● AE Guide 100%: Architectural-Engineer Guide 100% Design Submittals For Project Specifications:
● INSP03L0: Preparing Project Specifications
● UFC 1-300-02 Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) Format Standard ● ER 1110-1-8155 Specifications
For Cost Estimating include Sacramento District Cost Estimate Requirements for Current Working Estimates (CWE) dated March 2020 as Enclosure 2 and CW Design Projects standard guidance is as follows:
● ER 1110-1-1300 Cost Engineering Policy and General Requirements ● UFC 3-740-05 Construction Cost Estimating
● EM 1110-2-1304 Civil Works Construction Cost Index System (CWCCIS) ● ER 1110-2-1302 Civil Works Cost Engineering

2.7 Horizontal and Vertical Datums
The basis of survey must be in US feet using California State Plane Coordinate System Zone II, NAD 83, and NAVD88 vertical datum.
413
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 3-1
Section 3 Quality Control Responsibilities
The JV team (including all subcontractors) has the responsibility for accuracy and completeness of plans, specifications, data collection efforts, and associated design products and documents prepared for this project and will check all such materials accordingly. Each team member will take responsibility for items they are qualified to handle and refer to the next higher level those items which exceed their qualifications or for which higher level review is required.

All plans, calculations, and documents submitted for review will be clearly marked as being fully checked by a qualified individual other than the originator.

This DQCP implements standards and policies as outlined in Tetra Tech’s Quality Practices Manual (Revision 3, dated February 2021) and includes requirements per ER 1165-2-217 dated May 2021.

The Quality Control review lead for this project is Michael Brown, P.E. The QC review lead will work with the Project Manager (PM) and Technical Discipline leads, who are required to coordinate the quality control (QC) tasks within their areas of responsibility. The QC review lead will monitor the continuous QC workflow by setting QC review milestones and check-in points with the task/discipline leads within the design schedule. The QC review lead will also validate the QC process by evaluating completion checklists, drawing check sets, check logs, and submittal signoffs developed by discipline-specific QC teams. Any deficiencies will be noted/documented, routed to the affected parties, and monitored by the PM and the QC review lead until resolved. The QC review lead is also responsible for the following QA activities:
• Implementing Quality Control requirements provided in the contract. • Maintaining a file of pertinent correspondence and a set of project guidelines. • Developing a central location to store in-house review sets of reports, notes, etc. • Monitoring and evaluating the design and checking activities of the project team. • Ensuring all submittals are reviewed for completeness and accuracy. • Ensuring all submittals are reviewed to determine that all DrChecks review comments are included. 414
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 4-1
Section 4 Project Delivery Philosophy and Team
Coordination

4.1 Project Delivery Philosophy
The JV Team Management Philosophy is to provide quality professional engineering services and products that consistently meet our client’s needs and expectations. Our management techniques are focused on this single philosophy.

A prerequisite to successful work is to understand and respond to the client’s current and future needs, requirements, expectations, and constraints. Additionally, • Project success depends on good management.
• Key elements to good management are planning, communication and coordination. • The Project must be continuously and systematically tracked to ensure a quality product delivered on schedule and within budget. The Project Manager and key team personnel must know the project status at all times.
• Quality assurance necessitates competent and responsible team members, open and effective communication, clear definition of goals and constraints, adequate tools and resources, and thorough checking, coordination, and review of submittals. • Quality improvement is a continuous process involving all team players. • Constructability and cost-effectiveness of both the overall project and of the individual components must be a main focus of the design.
• Value engineering is a continuous process involving all team members. • Design and construction schedules must be realistic and attainable.

The JV management team recognizes that delivery of high-quality services is critical to success. The JV team has developed specific Quality Assurance/Quality Control policies and practices to ensure that staff provide the highest quality professional service to clients. These policies are documented in the Quality Practices Manual referenced in Section 3 and are reflected herein.

4.2 Team Coordination
A project team comprised of qualified and experienced members has been assembled to complete the requirements for this project. Upon approval of the DQCP, the JV team will hold a kickoff meeting to review the Quality Plan and associated roles and responsibilities of each team member. This meeting will include discussion of the Design Quality Control Review (DQCR) process and the schedule for each deliverable by design package as well as the required certification forms.

For each design package, the A-E project team for that package will hold bi-weekly team meetings under the direction and facilitation of the design package technical lead. In alternate weeks, virtual design package progress meetings will be held with USACE and the NFS. These meetings provide the opportunity to discuss and share relevant information for progressing the work in a multi-discipline manner and for engaging client input regularly. Other meetings will be scheduled to deal with specific coordination or quality control aspects of the project as needed. The primary means of communication will be via email and virtual meetings with A-E and USACE and NFS team members. DrChecks will be used to view, 415
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 4-2
monitor, and respond to Government comments and will be used to document Independent Technical Reviews (DQCRs).

Each team member is responsible for carrying out the functions associated with their assigned project team position. At the beginning of this Task Order, an A-E Project Kickoff Meeting will be held with project team members to acquaint them with all the requirements of this project including technical requirements, schedule, budget, and quality control, as well as to communicate what is expected from them, and who provides guidance, support, and/or approval for the work assigned. Communications within the project team is of utmost importance. USACE and NFS comments, agency requirements, changes in scope, and changes in schedule will be quickly and accurately communicated to other members of the project team by email, verbal communication, and regular coordination meetings. USACE and NFS requirements will be determined at all required milestones during the project and complied with fully.

Construction costs, total project costs, and schedule will be monitored and controlled throughout the project duration. The Government will have an opportunity to review and provide comments. The JV team will adjust cost estimates based on comments from the Government, as appropriate. Construction cost estimates will be developed using MII.

Design budget constraints have been determined based on the Scope of Work and information and details provided by USACE. The JV project team will plan, schedule, and monitor resources to include labor hours, costs, expenses, etc. on a weekly and monthly basis. Monthly progress reviews will be held with Tetra Tech’s Regional Manager. Quarterly progress reviews will be held with Tetra Tech’s Risk Management Lead and Operations Lead.

Coordination and planning are required to provide appropriate durations for review and approval of submittals. The design project schedule will be reviewed at monthly task order progress meetings and biweekly design package meetings, and updated as needed based on actual events. 416
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 5-1
Section 5 Quality Control Methods

5.1 AE Design Quality Control Review of Work Products
The internal AE review process will follow the requirements of ER 1165-2-217, Civil Works Review Policy, USACE. Specifically, Chapters 4 and 9 dictate the requirements of the AE review. The JV team specific processes are also included.

The review process for every deliverable includes preparation, check, approval, and independent review.

The work product is prepared by a designer with the appropriate experience, background, training and credentials to perform the work. The checker, who is of appropriate technical capability and experience as regards the subject matter to be checked and who has had no hand in the preparation of the work product, performs detailed quality checks of the work products. It is the responsibility of the checker and the designer to resolve any differences before approval.

If neither the designer nor the checker is designated as Engineer of Record with the responsibility to stamp the work product, both should be working under the direction of the EOR. The EOR is expected to provide a final review:
• to verify completeness,
• to confirm that the approach followed was as directed by the EOR and work product(s) are reasonable and appropriate, and
• to confirm that preparation and checking procedures were followed.

Following resolution of all comments, an independent technical reviewer will be assigned to review the work product. Objectives of an ITR are to confirm the following:
• Engineering concepts are valid.
• Design assumptions are reasonable and proper.
• Design is feasible and will be safe and functional.
• Cost estimates are reasonable and accurate.
• Engineering analysis is correct.
• Compliance with client engineering policy requirements. • Compliance with accepted engineering practice
Independent Technical Reviewers will be chosen from experienced senior staff not associated with the development of the design. These reviewers should have the experience to judge reasonableness of the results and to assess the appropriateness of methodologies used. The independent reviewer makes critical examination of the approach to and the quality of the work; the review should encompass the DDR, drawings, specifications and supporting calculations.

Upon completion of the review process the Principal Engineer, QC review lead, and Project Manager will certify that the review process has been completed and the comments have been resolved and incorporated. 417
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 5-2

5.1.1 Checker
The checker must ensure all calculations, assumptions and models used are correct. The checker will also ensure that the design intent is correctly represented within the plans and specifications and appropriately documented within the DDR.

Designer and Checker are co-responsible for the adequacy of the work products. Checks should include:
• Accuracy and applicability of fundamental data, assumptions, and methods. • Completeness and correctness of computations and models. • Check that all calculations are based on the established design criteria for the project. • Reasonableness of results. Judge the results by comparison with past projects or by independent check using an alternative method.
• For computations performed by a computer, the following checking activities shall be performed:
o For a calculation aid, the Checker confirms the accuracy of the approach with an alternative method on a representative sample of the design and checks the accuracy and correctness of the input data as well as reasonableness of output.
o For a standard discipline application, the Checker performs a check of the accuracy and correctness of the input data.

Process:
• Each annotation and number on a computation, model input, or critical graphic/plan elements shall be marked with a highlight (“red dot”) to indicating concurrence with the correctness of the information shown. For items needing correction, corrections should be made adjacent to original item. Reconciliation of comments will be reflected by final copies of work products with highlights or red dots for all elements including updated items.
• If an error affects subsequent computations or products, the designer shall correct the computations using the procedures for computation preparation prior to further checking. • Designer shall review all comments, corrections, and changes. Designer and Checker will reconcile all differences between original and corrected computations prior to subsequent approval. • In case of a disagreement between the designer and the checker that cannot be resolved by the approver, a Senior Engineer is to be consulted. In rare instances, the region’s Chief Engineer (or similar counterpart) will be consulted to resolve any irreconcilable disputes. • Documents retained for quality verification purposes will include all information showing checker’s comments and reconciliation of comments.

5.1.2 Engineer of Record
The EOR is responsible for assuring that quality checks have been performed and resolved, and verifies that all points listed below are satisfied:
• Accuracy and applicability of basic assumptions.
• Correctness and applicability of methods used.
• Completeness of computations.
418
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 5-3
• Reasonableness of results.
• Compliance with appropriate procedures for preparation and checking. • Compliance with Industry and USACE policies and procedures. • Review of the project design and assessment regarding achievement of the project goals. • Evaluation of the general selection and sizing of materials and equipment. • Review of the practicality of the design.
• Review of the design theory, concepts, and project layout, to determine if they are logical and presented in a clear manner.
• Determination of the applicability of computer programs used. • Review of adequacy of the technical specifications.

For computations performed by a computer, the EOR will verify the following:
• For a calculation aid – the calculation method and its limitations, and the conclusions based upon the computer output. The EOR is also responsible for verifying that the required documentation for the calculation aid has been provided and that the checking functions have been performed. • For a standard discipline application – the EOR will verify that the use was appropriate and within limitations of the application and that the conclusions drawn from the results are appropriate. The EOR is also responsible for verifying that the required documentation has been included with the computation records and that the checking functions have been performed.

5.1.3 Independent Technical Review
Independent technical reviews will be performed on all products. Independent Technical Reviewers (Peer Reviewers) will be chosen from experienced senior staff not associated with the development of the design.

The independent reviewer makes critical examination of the quality of work and the methods used and provides appraisal of both technical results and efficiency of engineering effort. Efforts include:
• Verify that concepts, assumptions, features, methods, analyses, and details are appropriate. • Verify that an appropriate range of feasible alternatives was evaluated. • Verify that problems, opportunities, and issues are properly defined and scoped. • Verify that the analytical methods used are appropriate and yield reliable results. • Verify that the results and recommendations are reasonable, within policy guidelines, and supported by the presentation.
• Confirm that any deviations from policy, guidance, and standards are appropriately identified and have been properly approved.
• Verify that the products represent constructible, operable, environmentally sound, and cost effective design.
• Verify that the products meet the customers’ needs.
419
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 5-4

5.1.4 Certification
Upon completion of the review and backcheck of the work products, certification of the completion of a quality review will be documented. The Project Manager, the Quality Control review lead, and the Engineer of Record will certify that the review process has been completed prior to submittal of the work package for USACE review. See Appendix C for the AE DQCR team names and an example of a Statement of Completion of the AE DQCR.

5.2 Calculations, Reports, and Other Documents
Neat, systematic, and complete documents, computations, drawings and graphics, will be made with special attention given to references, sketches, and notes. These will permit others to review the work products with ease and accuracy.

All documents will present information in a manner that takes into account assumptions, analyses, and rationale for achieving the final conclusion. Documents must contain a full record of decisions, assumptions, and methods. Documents must be sufficiently clear so that a reviewer or other individual not familiar with the project could review the documents and understand how the project/analysis evolved into its final recommendation/configuration, and why each key decision was made. Documents must be sufficiently detailed for each technical specialty, so that the criteria that were used, the critical assumptions that were made, and the analytical methods that were used is evident for purposes of review and historical documentation. Documents must contain summaries of important model/calculation results and selected example calculations for all critical elements of the study or design. Documents should be clear enough to support execution of the review process by reviewers without reference to other records, except for confirming that all supporting documents/computations have been checked.

Computation identification shall include:
1) Designer’s name and date of preparation (with initials on subsequent pages), 2) Checker’s name and date of review (all pages initialed), 3) Approver’s name and date of review completion,
4) Project Number and Name,
5) Subject or applicable area of project work,
6) Page number (Page x of y on each sheet), and
7) Brief description of the computation’s content / purpose.

5.3 Computer Assisted Calculation and Modeling
Use of the computer is desirable for execution of repetitive or lengthy analyses and design activities.

Individuals are encouraged to utilize the standard applications provided on the computers. All input should be reviewed for correctness and the results should be reviewed for reasonableness. All computer programs will have Discipline Lead approval prior to use. Computer-generated computational print-outs will include the application program name. The computations shall be complete and presented in a neat and concise order for review. All calculations will be provided in PDF format and all major sections bookmarked.
420
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 5-5
At final submission or upon request, calculation source files, such as Excel, MathCAD, STAAD Pro., etc. shall be submitted to the Government with adequate information presented within the calculations to ensure the Government will not need to recreate the analysis.

All input files for each analysis software used will be included. Output results for each feature and for each limit state and failure mode analyzed will be summarized. These summaries will be included in the report body. The output files will not be spooled and attached to the DDR but will be readily available for review at the Government’s request.

5.3.1 Computer Models
The following items will be documented within the review package for work products developed utilizing computer models:
• A cover sheet shall be provided with computation identification information as noted in Section 5.2.
o Software name and version must be noted.
o Model must include narrative or spreadsheets clearly describing the model and its purpose so that the reviewer can follow the designer’s thought process.
• Inputs that utilize other sources will be clearly annotated and related back to the originating source.
• Outputs from the model that are used to carry forward other calculations or work products will be clearly annotated and related back to the originating model.
• For computations performed by a computer, the following checking activities shall be performed:
• Checked computer model computations will be highlighted (red dot check) on the computation/annotations and the model input parameters. • A hand check, or other independent verification of the critical loading case or results to demonstrate the conclusions from the model being used are appropriate must be performed.

5.3.2 Calculation Aids (Excel, MathCad, etc.)
Calculation aids including Excel, Mathcad and other tools are useful to increase design accuracy and efficiency. Each engineer and architect are responsible for understanding the basis and limitations of any design calculation aid selected. When calculation aids are used, full referencing shall be employed to assure that others will be able to verify the work. Unfamiliar calculation aids shall be checked by alternative methods to verify their accuracy for various ranges of the problem parameters. The following items will be documented within the review package for work products developed utilizing calculation aids:
• For a calculation aid, the review functions include verification of the calculation method and its limitations, and the conclusions based upon the output. The reviewers are responsible for verifying that the required 421
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 5-6
documentation for the calculation aid has been provided and that the checking functions have been performed.
• For a standard discipline application (i.e. spreadsheet tools developed for repetitive calculations), the review functions include determining that the use was appropriate and within limitations of the application and that the conclusions drawn from the results are appropriate. The reviewers are also responsible for verifying that the required documentation has been included with the computation records and that the checking functions have been performed.

5.4 Specifications
Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) will be used in the development of the specifications for this project, in future phases.

5.5 Drawings
Drawings and plans will be presented to the reviewers in organized PDF format to facilitate accessibility for the review efforts. They will be reviewed in conjunction with the calculations, design documentation report, and the specifications in order for the reviewer to verify the design intent is correctly represented within the plans. Additional detailed review of the plans will be as follows:
• All drawings are to be completed in accordance with the design criteria and the client's standards. • All drawings are to be backchecked by the original designer after the calculations are checked. • Drawing checkers are responsible for ensuring every item is checked, including dimensional accuracy, completeness, clarity, adherence to applicable standards, technical accuracy, and coordination with other project documents including the technical specifications. • The checker will place a yellow highlight on each critical graphic and/or element (dimension / elevation, note, or reference) if correct. If incorrect the deficiencies/corrections will be noted by the checker in red. Process will be repeated after corrections are made. • Checker will work with originator and CAD to agree upon and address deficiencies. • Checked drawings are to be dated and signed.
• All original sheets, if any, and electronic files noting comments and resolution of comments are to be kept in permanent project files.
• Final design drawing sets are to be kept on file until the construction of the project is completed. • All drawings must show names of designer and drafter. Drawings must be dated, sealed and signed in accordance with the client's requirements and with governing laws.

5.6 Reports
Report quality is the responsibility of the design package Technical Leads, Discipline Leads, and Project Manager. These documents include the DDR, Geotechnical Report, and any other report documents that are produced.
422
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 5-7
All reports will be reviewed in accordance with Section 5.1.4, above. Comments on the document will be made via the comment feature within the pdf document. Comment evaluation and resolution will also be performed within the comment feature. Reports may also undergo a review by a technical editor. A digital signature page will be added for reviewer to certify their review activity.

The PM will designate a final independent reviewer for each report. The purpose of this final review is for overall report presentation, appearance, consistency, and conformance with the JV team and USACE standards.

5.7 USACE and NFS Review
The Reviews are dictated by ER 1165-2-217, Civil Works Review Policy. These reviews include a District Quality Control Assurance (DQCA) review, an Agency Technical Review (ATR), and a Biddability, Constructability, Operability, Environmental, and Sustainability (BCOES) Review. During this phase of the project, only concept-level design will be conducted. As a result, the focus will solely be on performing the DQCA review during this phase of the project. The USACE and NFS will review at the same time for the DQCA. The JV team will generate responses to comments generated by USACE and NFS as part of these reviews during the formal review milestones.

The comments and responses will be managed via DrChecks. The DrChecks setup and review will be initiated by the USACE team. USACE will either provide DrChecks access to the NFS or upload their comments for them. USACE will review Dr Checks Comments filtering to those pertinent to design and limiting the preference-based comments. Resolution of conflicting comments from USACE and NFS will be managed by USACE. USACE and NFS reviewer comments and backchecks will be evaluated by the Technical Lead and discipline leads. Comments will be assigned for evaluation and resolution to the appropriate PDT member. All comment and backcheck responses developed will be reviewed and approved by design package technical lead or his/her designee. Uploading responses input into DrChecks will be managed by the JV team.

The Project Manager with support from technical discipline leads (EORs), will verify that all comment responses are clear, complete, and constructive. Any disputes will be discussed with the design PDT and PM prior to response submission. The PM will also confirm that the specified actions required of the comment resolutions are acted on and incorporated into the documents prior to the next submittal.

Comments requiring clarification will be discussed with USACE before final implementation. Clear direction and concurrence on the path forward to resolution for all comments will be documented within the DrChecks response.

The DrChecks generated comment/response document will be utilized during subsequent Quality Control review checks on each submittal to verify comments have been addressed prior to the next submittal. This verification is the responsibility of the PM.

Government reviews will be held for all submittals.
423
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 6-1
Section 6 Project Delivery Team (PDT)
The PDT is a multi-disciplined team with the responsibility to keep project work integrated and done in accordance with the approved business and quality management processes; ensure the customer’s quality objectives are clearly articulated; convey to the customer the essential professional standards, laws and codes which must be incorporated into the work; meet the commitments for completion of their portion of the work; and monitor and be accountable for the quality of their work. The PDT will be led by Orlando Lopes, P.E., an experienced engineer and project manager with extensive experience working on USACE projects.

It is the responsibility of the Project Manager to confirm that all design deliverables include the authorized project scope and address compliance with all applicable code, policy, and criteria. The PM is also responsible for ensuring that each deliverable is prepared and reviewed.

The PDT includes other staff with extensive professional experience in their assigned responsibilities. The team is well-balanced but should future project requirements surface which require different skills and experience, those personnel will be added.

See Appendix B for Project Delivery Team (PDT) members, roles and responsibilities and years of experience.
424
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 7-1
Section 7 Design Schedule
A design schedule will be prepared for this project per the Scope of Work and will be included in Appendix D.
425
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 8-1
Section 8 Records Maintenance
The following QC documentation must be provided, in electronic format, to the Contracting Officer Representative:
• The initial Design Quality Control Plan as well as any revisions made to the plan during the design process.
• Independent technical review comments, resolution of comments, and Statement of Completion of AE DQCR (concurrent with all design submittals).
• USACE review comments and AE responses to comments for all deliverable reviews as outlined in Section 5.7.
• Design Documentation Report, which includes but is not limited to planned design criteria, references, design decisions, assumptions, methods, and any initial calculations, plus the item above.
426
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District 9-1
Section 9 Signatures
2/11/2025
Task Order Manager / Project Manager Date
2/12/2025
A-E Quality Assurance / Quality Control Review Lead Date 2/12/2025
Principal Date
2/12/2025
Contract Manager Date
2/12/2025
Design Technical Lead Date
Principal Date
Geotechnical Engineer of Record Date
Geotechnical Technical Lead Date
Mechanical Technical Lead Date
Date
Date
2/17/2025 2/17/2025 2/17/2025
2/19/2025
427
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District A-1
Appendix A Government Points of Contact
Table 9-1: Government Points of Contact
Title Contact Information
Contracting Officer
Johnny Kim
(916) 326-9527
Email: [email protected]
Government Project Manager (PM)
Robert Dick

CESPK-PM-SPC
(916) 557-5162
Email: [email protected]
Government Technical Lead
(Primary point of contact)
Morgan O'Brien

CESPK-EDD
(916) 557-7131
Email: Morgan.E.O’[email protected]
428
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District B-1
Appendix B Project Delivery Team
Table 9-2: Project Delivery Team
Name
Discipline
(Yrs. Exp. in
Discipline)
Role Office Registration
Orlando Lopes Civil
(11 Years)
Task Order Manager /
Project Manager
Tetra Tech
Irvine PE
Ike Pace Civil, Cost
(26 Years) Contract Manager Tetra Tech Irvine

PE, SE,
CCP
Ira Artz Civil
(43 Years) Principal Tetra Tech Irvine PE
Jung Suh Civil
(22 Years) Lead Designer Tetra Tech Irvine PE
Vamsi Sridhara Hydraulic
(19 Years)
Hydraulic Technical
Lead
Tetra Tech
Fairfax
Jackie Wang Structural
(22 Years)
Structural Technical
Lead
Tetra Tech
Seattle PE, SE
Scott Vose Cost
(16 Years) Cost Estimator Tetra Tech Irvine
Gary Sommerfeld
Geotech
(35 Years)
Geotechnical
Technical Lead
Black & Veatch
Kansas City GE, PE
Alex Bjelica
Mechanical
(22 Years)
Mechanical Technical
Lead
Black & Veatch
Rancho Cordova PE
Haze Rodgers
Geotech
(22 Years)
Geotechnical Engineer
of Record
Blackburn
Auburn GE, PE
429
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District C-1
Appendix C AE Design Quality Control Review Team
Table 9-3: Design Quality Control Review Team
Name
Discipline
(Yrs. Exp. in
Discipline)
Role Office Registration
Michael Brown Geotechnical
(36 Years) QA QC Manager Tetra TechIrvine PE
Aric Torreyson Civil
(22 Years)
Independent Technical
Reviewer
Tetra Tech
Irvine PE
James Costello Structural
(35 Years)
Independent Technical
Reviewer
Tetra Tech
Irvine PE
Sen Bai Hydraulic
(25 Years)
Independent Technical
Reviewer
Tetra Tech
Fairfax PE
Taylor Canfield Cost Engineer
(20 Years)
Independent Technical
Reviewer
Tetra Tech
Louisville
Mark Petersen Geotechnical
(43 Years)
Independent Technical
Reviewer
Black & Veatch
Kansas City
PE, GE
Rich Vaughn Mechanical
(43 Years)
Independent Technical
Reviewer
Black & Veatch
Tualatin
PE
430
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District C-2
Statement of Completion of AE Quality Control Review (A-E) The JV team has completed the AE Design Quality Control Review (DQCR) for the FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure Project. Notice is hereby given that an AE DQCR, that is appropriate to the level of risk and complexity inherent in the project, has been conducted as defined in the Design Quality Control Plan.

The AE DQCR included review of assumptions; methods, procedures, and material used in analyses; alternatives evaluated; the appropriateness of data used, and level obtained; and reasonableness of the result, including whether the product meets the customer’s needs. The DQCR was accomplished by an independent team. All comments resulting from the review have been resolved and documented either within the JV team Review Comment Forms or in DrChecks.

Design Package Technical Lead Date
Quality Control Review Lead Date
Project Manager Date
Certification of Quality Control Review
Significant concerns and the explanation of the resolution are as follows:

As noted above, all concerns resulting from technical review of this engineering product have been fully resolved or will be resolved as indicated.
431
FY24 Stone Lock Closure Structure
DQCP Draft Submittal
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Tetra Tech-Black & Veatch JV Sacramento District D-1
Appendix D Submittal and Review Schedule
432
Submittal and Review Schedule for Project Deliverables
Deliverables For Each Task Draft Submittal Date USACE Review Final/Revised Submittal
Date
Task 1: Project Schedule and Meetings
Quality Control Plan Submitted with Proposal Mon 11/18/24 - Mon 1/13/25 Mon 2/17/25 Accident Prevention Plan Fri 1/10/25 Mon 1/13/25 - Wed 1/15/25 Tue 1/21/25 Task 2: Survey
Draft Mapping/Report Fri 5/2/25 Mon 5/5/25 - Fri 5/30/25 Fri 6/13/25 Draft Utility Investigation Report and Plans Fri 4/11/25 Mon 4/14/25 - Fri 5/9/25 Fri 5/23/25 Task 3: Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Engineering Services Geotechnical Investigation Plan Tue 12/31/24 Wed 1/1/25 - Tue 3/25/25 Mon 4/7/25 Laboratory Testing Plan Mon 5/26/25 Tue 5/27/25 - Mon 6/9/25 Mon 6/16/25 Geotechnical Data Report Wed 8/27/25 Thu 8/28/25 - Wed 10/8/25 Wed 10/22/25 Preliminary Geotechnical Design Memorandum Wed 10/29/25 Thu 10/30/25 - Wed 11/19/25 Wed 12/3/25 Draft Geotechnical Basis of Design Report Wed 1/14/26 Thu 1/15/26 - Mon 3/16/26 Mon 3/30/26 Task 4: Hydrodynamics Modeling of the Stone Lock and Hydraulicly Connected Areas
Hydrodynamic Model and Report Fri 11/28/25 Mon 12/1/25 - Fri 1/2/26 Fri 1/16/26 Particle Tracking Model and Report Mon 1/26/26 Tue 1/27/26 - Mon 2/16/26 Fri 2/27/26 Task 5: Plans and Design Documentation Report – Conceptual Phase Conceptual Plans, DDR and Cost Estimate Wed 1/14/26 Thu 1/15/26 - Wed 2/11/26 Wed 3/25/26 * Project schedule is being continuously updated. This updates will follow the revisions to the project design schedule. ** Some items have been completed and are identified with actual dates. *** Note that this schedule only assumes DQCA review and does not include time for ATR, BCOES, IEPR, etc. 433
pg. 1

8.2 Construction Quality Management
Construction Quality Management (CQM), including Contractor Quality Control (CQC) and USACE Construction Quality Assurance (QA), are governed by ER 1180-1-6. For practical purposes, the USACE Construction-Operations Division (C-O), Resident Engineer (RE) will be responsible for CQM. The RE is the District Commander's authorized representative and in most cases, the ACO. The RE/ACO major duties include:
• Contract administration functions in accordance with delegated authorities as an Authorized Representative of the Contracting Officer • Coordinate contracts change orders, modifications, and execution of modifications within the ACO authority
• Prepare and process contractor progress payment requests • Manage and approve contractor submittals; Ensure all submittals are received • Refer submittals to the Engineering Division’s Project Engineer for review, if needed • Provide an approval/disapproval action on all submittals requiring Government approval as specified in the contract
• Conduct an oversight review on 100% of the submittals not requiring Government approval as a quality assurance function
• Enforce the safety and security provisions of the contract • Monitor construction progress
• Ensure that the contractor provides a preliminary network analysis (schedule) in accordance with the contract and in a timely manner
• Ensure that the contractor correctly updates the network analysis schedule each month to reflect actual job progress
• Take appropriate action under the terms of the contract for any anticipated delays in milestone or project completion and report any anticipated delays in the coordination meetings
• Administer all contract disputes to the extent of his/her authority • Investigate and negotiate to resolve disputes
• Perform Quality Assurance such as inspections and tests to determine whether the contractor’s Quality Control Program is performing properly • Ensure that the Contractor’s QC system is producing the required quality and applies appropriate enforcement measures when necessary to obtain required quality construction
• Ensure coordination with the team regarding progress, success, and challenges 434

8.1 Quality Management Plan

8.1.1 Design Quality Management
The scope of the Review Plan (Appendix F) includes the plans and specifications for the various construction contracts associated with this project. The levels of review required are District Quality Control (DQC), Agency Technical Review (ATR), Type II Independent External Peer Review (IEPR) also known as Safety Assurance Review (SAR), and a BCOES Review . DQC is an internal review process of basic science and engineering work products focused on fulfilling the project quality requirements. ATR is undertaken to ensure the quality and credibility of the government’s scientific information. The SAR is conducted to examine resiliency, robustness, and redundancy of the project and to consider the adequacy, appropriateness, and acceptability of the design and construction activities in assuring public health, safety, and welfare. The ATR and SAR may occur simultaneously.

District Quality Control (DQC): In accordance with ER 1165-2-217, Civil Works Review Policy, all work products and reports, evaluations, and assessments shall undergo the necessary and appropriate DQC. This review is managed by the Sacramento District in accordance with the Major Subordinate Command (MSC) and district Quality Management Plans and includes seamless quality checks and reviews, supervisory reviews, and PDT reviews including input from the Non-Federal Sponsors.

DQC will be conducted on all plan set packages at all levels (35%, 65%, 90%, final plans and specifications, basis of design reports, etc.). Quality Assurance (QA) review will be administered by the appropriate discipline Section Chiefs. 435
Template Version: 19

SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

DESIGN BID BUILD

CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS

QUALITY CONTROL PLAN (QCP)
West Sacramento Project, Sacramento
River North Levee (SRNL) Contract 1S

Table of Contents

1. Project Information ......................................................................................................................................... 2

2. Contract Title................................................................................................................................................... 2

3. Project Description.......................................................................................................................................... 2

4. Contract Roles & Responsibilities................................................................................................................... 2

5. Programmed Amount ...................................................................................................................................... 2

6. Name and Location of Local Sponsor............................................................................................................. 3

7. Quality Control Plan Objective ....................................................................................................................... 3

8. Quality Guidelines for the Technical Review ................................................................................................. 3

9. Technical Review Criteria............................................................................................................................... 3

10. Design Criteria ................................................................................................................................................ 4

11. IH PDT Members............................................................................................................................................ 4

12. QC Review Team Members............................................................................................................................ 5

13. Biddability, Constructability, Operability, Environmental, and Sustainability Review.................................. 5

14. BCOES Cert Signatories................................................................................................................................. 5

15. Local Sponsor.................................................................................................................................................. 6

16. Agency Technical Review Team (ATR)......................................................................................................... 6

17. Type II Safety Assurance Review (SAR) Team.............................................................................................. 6

18. Value Engineering (VE).................................................................................................................................. 6

19. Major Milestones / Schedule........................................................................................................................... 6

20. Items Requiring Special Attention .................................................................................................................. 7

21. In-House DBB IFB.......................................................................................................................................... 7

22. Partnering or Conflict Resolution Procedures for the Stakeholders................................................................ 8

23. Constraints on the Process............................................................................................................................... 8

24. Financial Resources Allocation....................................................................................................................... 8

25. SPK Construction Allocation .......................................................................................................................... 9

26. Signatures........................................................................................................................................................ 9 436
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
2 1. Project Information
West Sacramento Project, Sacramento River North Levee (SRNL) Contract 1S, 2023, P2-456851, Yolo County, California

2. Contract Title
West Sacramento Project, SRNL Contract 1S

3. Project Description
Produce construction contract documents for the West Sacramento Project, SRNL Contract 1S to address seepage remediation and stability problems along the Sacramento River North Levee. a. 2016 GRR Recommended Plan:
• Station: 0+00 to 71+00 AND 100+00 to 138+00
i. Slurry Cutoff Walls

4. Contract Roles & Responsibilities
Sacramento District Engineering Division will prepare a full in-house design package. See IH paragraph for names and disciplines of Project Delivery Team (PDT) members. See paragraphs [12] through [17] for names of reviewers. This effort includes a one-day predesign meeting to gather preliminary information and requirements.

Engineering Division will prepare the 35%, 65%, 95%, and 100% Design submittals. Reviews and backcheck will occur following the submittals; the Backcheck submittal will completely incorporate all comments received from quality control, quality assurance, and customer reviewers. See paragraph [21] for anticipated products submitted at each phase. Tele-presences review meetings will occur following the 35%, 65%, 95%, and 100% submittal review phases.

The Technical Lead will coordinate effort required by the technical disciplines of the Project Delivery Team. The Technical Lead will notify the Project Manager of potential impacts to scope, budget, or schedule, including user requested changes. The Project Manager will periodically check in with the design team, through the Technical Lead, to discuss schedule and submittals, identify problems being encountered, and reinforce the requirements of this QCP. The Project Manager will coordinate effort required by all other members of the Project Delivery Team.

When technical information or input is needed by other members of the Project Delivery Team, the Project Manager will communicate this request through the Technical Lead in a timely manner.

This project is expected to be advertised as an Invitation for Bid. Solicitation documents will be prepared by Sacramento District Contracting Division. The designated Technical Lead may be required to participate in the Source Selection Evaluation Board for this project.

5. Programmed Amount
Per the projects’ documentation, dated 13 JAN 2023, the Programmed Amount for all SRNL construction and labor is $361M.
437
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
3 6. Name and Location of Local Sponsor
Name of Office/Address Point of Contact & Phone
Sponsor
Office Name: WSAFCA
Mailing Address: 1110 West Capitol
Avenue, 2nd Floor
West Sacramento, CA 95691
POC Name: Greg Fabun
Phone: (916) 617-4855
Fax: (916) 371-0845
E-mail: [email protected]
Office Name: DWR
Mailing Address: 1416 9th St,
Sacramento, CA 95814
POC Name: Vance Cave
Phone: (916) 820-7708
E-mail: [email protected]

7. Quality Control Plan Objective
The Quality Control Plan is a component of the Quality Management Plan (QMP) and Project Management Plan (PMP). The purpose of this QCP is to identify the schedule of all required reviews, technical design and review criteria, PDT members, QC Review Team members, Agency Technical Review (ATR) Team leader and members, and procedures to assure production of high quality contract documents within the authorized funds, scope, and the Customer and User’s time requirements. Any deviations from procedures will be identified in this QCP and waivers obtained prior to initiation of design.

The design team shall be directed to Appendix B of ER 415-1-11 BCOES Review for a Review Checklist that will assist in the production and completeness of the design documents. Lessons learned from previous projects will be used to improve the quality of design products. The Project Manager and Technical Lead will ensure the design team has access to all criteria required to adequately perform their task.

8. Quality Guidelines for the Technical Review
The SPK Section Chiefs are responsible for the technical QC Review, or will delegate the QC review responsibilities to other senior designers. SPK will perform a QC Review prior to submitting the Design Package for the formal Customer, ATR, and BCOES reviews. Key personnel from the Non-Federal Sponsor (NFS) will participate in a Customer Review of the project to ensure local standards, operational safety and functional requirements are met. [Sacramento] District Construction Division, Resident, and Area Offices will perform the Biddability, Constructability, Operability, Environmental and Sustainability (BCOES) Review to assure the project properly addresses these considerations.

The Design Technical Lead (TL) will provide oversight of the QC process to ensure their effectiveness in the production of quality products in accordance with this plan. The TL will coordinate each QC and PDT Review and ensure that these comments are entered in DrChecks. DrChecks will also be used to coordinate and respond to Outside Agency review comments for this project. This system will allow all parties involved to track review comments and monitor the quality of the design documents throughout all phases of design.

9. Technical Review Criteria
ER 1165-2-217 Review Policy for Civil Works, 1 May 2021 https://www.swf.usace.army.mil/Portals/47/docs/Section 408/ER_1165-2-217.pdf ER 1110-1-12 QUALITY MANAGEMENT
http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerRegulations/ER_1110-1-12.pdf ER 415-1-11 BIDDABILITY, CONSTRUCT ABILITY, OPERABILITY, ENVIRONMENTAL AND

SUSTAINABILITY (BCOES) REVIEWS
http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerRegulations/ER_415-1-11.pdf 438
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
4 10. Design Criteria
a. Design Criteria Date
All design criteria, codes, and requirements are to be used from AUG 10, 2023. b. All Projects
ER 1110-2-1150 Engineering and Design for Civil Works Projects https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/Portals/76/Publications/EngineerRegulations/ER_1110-2-1150.pdf Sacramento District Architect-Engineer Guide General Requirements [REFP13L0] Sacramento District Architect-Engineer 35% Design Submittals [REFP21L0] Sacramento District Architect-Engineer 65% Design Submittals [REFP22L0] Sacramento District Architect-Engineer 95% Design Submittals [REFP23L0] c. USACE Projects
Army/USACE Criteria https://www.wbdg.org/ffc/army-coe
USACE Publications http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/ d. Project Specific Criteria
N/A

11. IH PDT Members
The In-House Project Delivery Team (PDT) members are as follows:

Member Name Discipline/Section
Heath Kirkwood Project Manager (West Sac Project)
Martin Fahning Project Manager (SRNL)
Damon Romero Senior Technical Lead
Jiayu (Carisa) Mai Civil Engineer Lead
Adam Duff Civil Engineer
Nicholas Plath
Loren Murray
Rich Millet
Civil Engineer (AECOM)
Colin Blackwood
Richard Silva
Engineering Technician (AECOM)
Benjamin Kochman Geotechnical Engineer
Derek Pate / Kellie Jemes Hydraulic Engineer (Analysis) Jimmy Pan Hydraulic Engineer (Design)
Jessica Tudor-Elliot Cultural Resources
David Colby Environmental Analysis
Lorena Guerrero Environmental Analysis
Diana Modini Specifications Engineer
Margaret Maatta Cost Engineer
439
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
5 Member Name Discipline/Section
Joy Ng DrChecks Site Administrator
Anderson Macatumbas Safety Office
Johnny Kim Contracting Officer
Stacey Barksdale Contracting Specialist
Joseph Marino Civil Engineering Survey and
Mapping
Elizabeth Dionne Planning
Melissa Hallas Planning
Holly Carpenter Planning
Nick Stauber Real Estate

12. QC Review Team Members
The In-House QC Review Team members consist of the responsible technical Section Chiefs or their delegate Subject Matter Expert (SME) as follows:

Member Unit or Section
Rick Torbik Civil Design Section B
Anthony Tran Soil Design Section A
Nicholas Kent Geology Section
Raziul Mollah Hydraulic Design Section
David Dean (Acting) Levee Safety Section
Andrea Meier Environmental Analysis Section
Jessica Tudor-Elliott Cultural Resources Section
Theresa Gneiting-James Cost Engineering Section
Aaron A. Klapheck Specifications Unit
Curtis Morris Safety Office
Crystal Ramos Real Estate TL

13. Biddability, Constructability, Operability, Environmental, and Sustainability Review [SPK] Construction-Operations Division, Area Office and Resident Office, Customer, Command, etc:

Name Title Office
Justin Puffer Chief Construction Quality Assurance Section Juan Gonzalez Chief Operations Division, Inspection Section David Colby Environmental Manager Planning Division
Josh Wagner Materials Engineer CESPK-CO
Geneva Kraus Archaeologist CESPK-PDR-C

14. BCOES Cert Signatories
The following are determined to be required signatories on the BCOES Certificate:

Name Title Name Title
Mark DeRocchi Chief, Engineering Division William Hall Chief, Civil Design Branch Heath Kirkwood Project Manager Adam Olson Chief, Real Estate Division 440
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
6 Name Title Name Title
Charlene McMurchy Value Engineering Officer Kevin Harper Chief, Environmental R. Branch Steve Gladwell Chief, Construction Division Randy P. Olsen Chief, Operations Division

15. Local Sponsor
Name Title Office
Greg Fabun Flood Protection Manager West Sacramento Area Flood Control Paul Dirksen Flood Protection Planner Agency (WSAFCA)
Brian Brown Senior Civil Engineer/Geotech
Mark Zollo Senior Analyst/Cultural/Enviro
Roger Cheng Civil Engineer DWR
Vance Cave Project Manager

16. Agency Technical Review Team (ATR)
Command Title Office
Matt Sheskier Civil Engineer, ATR Lead CEIWR-RMC-WD
Bobby Van Cleave Geotechnical Engineer CESWL-EC-D
Bryan Dirks Civil Engineer CEMVS-EC-D
Nick Koutsunis Civil Engineer (Hydraulic) CELRH-DSPC-TS TBD Civil Engineer (Construction)
TBD Supervisory Biologist
Nick Backmann Geotechnical Engineer, LRL, Risk
Cadre Lead

CELRL-ED-T-G
TBD Engineering Geologist
TBD Economist (Consequences)
TBD Operations

17. Type II Safety Assurance Review (SAR) Team
Name Title AE Firm
TBD (AE Task Order)
TBD (AE Task Order)
TBD (AE Task Order)

18. Value Engineering (VE)
Value engineering to occur at the Concept Design Phase.

VE Member Title Office
Charlene McMurchy VE Tech CESKP-EDS

19. Major Milestones / Schedule
Event Begin Date
(dd mmm yyyy)
Pre-Design Conference 10 AUG 2023
35% Design Review Submittal 09 APR 2024
65% Design Review Submittal 19 DEC 2024
95% Design Review Submittal 24 JUL 2025
441
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
7 Event Begin Date
(dd mmm yyyy)
Final Design Backcheck Review 01 DEC 2025
Final Certifications / Enviro / RE 02 DEC 2025

20. Items Requiring Special Attention
None

21. In-House DBB IFB
Submittals other than product samples must be Electronic PDF files. a. Early Preliminary Design Phase - 35% Design Submittal (Initial ATR, DQC) IAW A-E 35% Design Submittals, the 35% Design Submittal must include the requirements of the 10% Design Submittal whether or not a 10% Design Submittal was required. As a minimum, the 35% Design Submittal consist of the following documents:
− Design Analysis (narrative and calculations)
− Drawings (Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Sections, etc.) − Outline Guide Specifications
− Project Safety and Health Requirements
− Results of Value Engineering studies performed on the project concept design. − Code B Cost Estimate
− Completed EPM (if required by the statement of work)
− Draft Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) Report − Other Items as required by the statement of work Design Analysis Narrative b. Preliminary Design Phase - 65% Design Submittal (Initial BCOES, SAR) IAW A-E 65% Design Submittals, the 65% Design Submittal must include the requirements of the 35% Design Submittal whether or not a 35% Design Submittal was required. As a minimum, the 65% Design Submittal consists of the following documents:
− Design Analysis (narrative and calculations)
− Drawings (Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Sections, Details, etc.) − Outline and Marked-up Guide Specifications (DIV 01-49) − Daft Specifications without Mark up (DIV 01-49)
− Project Safety and Health Requirements
− Results of Value Engineering studies performed on the project concept design. − Code B Cost Estimate
− Completed EPM (if required by the statement of work)
− Draft ECIFP Report
− Other Items as required by the statement of work
c. Final Design Phase - 90-100% Design Submittal
IAW A-E 100% Design Submittals, the 90-100% Design Submittal must include the requirements of the 65% Design Submittal whether or not a 65% Design Submittal was required. As a minimum, the 90-100% Design Submittal consists of the following documents:
442
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
8 − Design Analysis (narrative and calculations (List Disciplines)) − Drawings
− Marked up Guide Specifications (DIV 01-49)
− Specifications without Mark up (DIV 01-49)
− Project Safety and Health Requirements
− Code C Cost Estimate
− DD Form 1354 Data Sheet
− Completed EPM (if required by the statement of work)
− Equipment Schedule
− Catalog Cuts
− Interior Design Brochure
− Color Boards
− ECIFP Report
− Other Items as required by the statement of work
d. Backcheck Submittal (100%)
All corrected submittals from all reviews.

22. Partnering or Conflict Resolution Procedures for the Stakeholders The In-House Designers agreed that the formal partnering session will not be scheduled at this time. Informal partnering will take place at both the pre-design and interim design sessions, continued to the furthest extent possible throughout the design process.

23. Constraints on the Process
None.

24. Financial Resources Allocation
The following amounts are planned for technical resources. Funding listed below is for QC components of work.

Distribution to be adjusted as determined necessary.

Budget Analyst: $43,000
P2 Scheduler: $42,000
Project Management: $180,000
Engineering Division: $10,000
Civil Works Design Branch: $7,000
Support Branch: $7,000
Technical Lead: $74,000
Hydraulic Engineer: $20,000
Civil Engineering: $200,000
Cost Engineering: $10,000
Geology: $20,000
Geotechnical Engineering: $182,000
Environmental Planning: $240,000
Geomatics: $7,000
Sustainable Design: $7,000
QAS&AE: $65,000
Safety: $7,000
VE: $25,000
Contracting: $30,000
443
CIVIL WORKS Quality Control Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, SRNL CONTRACT 1S, 2023, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
9 [other discipline] $10,000
Total: $1,186,000

25. SPK Construction Allocation
SPK Construction has allocated the following for the BCOES review: $21,000

26. Signatures
Direct questions on the above to the Technical Lead.

Martin Fahning Date
Project Manager
Damon Romero Date
Technical Lead
William Hall, P.E. Date
Chief, Civil Works Design Branch
444
Template Version: 4

SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

DESIGN BID BUILD

CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS

QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN (QAP)
West Sacramento Project, Yolo Bypass Levee, Yolo County, California Table of Contents

1. Project Information: ........................................................................................................................................ 2

2. Project Description: ......................................................................................................................................... 2

3. Project Roles & Responsibilities ..................................................................................................................... 2

4. Programmed Amount: ..................................................................................................................................... 3

5. Name and Location of Local Sponsor: ............................................................................................................ 3

6. Quality Assurance Plan Objective: .................................................................................................................. 3

7. Quality Guidelines for the Technical Review: ................................................................................................ 3

8. Technical Review Criteria: .............................................................................................................................. 4

9. Design Criteria: ............................................................................................................................................... 4

10. PDT Members: ................................................................................................................................................ 5

11. QA Review Team Members ............................................................................................................................ 5

12. Biddability, Constructability, Operability, Environmental, and Sustainability Review: ................................. 6

13. Local Sponsor .................................................................................................................................................. 6

14. Agency Technical Review Team: ................................................................................................................... 6

15. Safety Assurance Review Team (TBD) .......................................................................................................... 6

16. Major Milestones / Schedule: .......................................................................................................................... 7

17. Unique, sensitive, or high visibility items requiring special attention. ............................................................ 7

18. Regular DBB IFB: ........................................................................................................................................... 7

19. Partnering or conflict resolution procedures for the stakeholders: .................................................................. 8

20. Constraints on the process: .............................................................................................................................. 8

21. Financial resources allocated to the technical process: ................................................................................... 8

22. SPK Construction Allocation: ......................................................................................................................... 9 QUALITY [CONTROL] [ASSURANCE] PLAN

APPROVED
Rick Poeppelman, P.E. Date
Chief, Engineering Division
445
CIVIL WORKS Quality Assurance Plan
WEST SACRAMENTO PROJECT, YOLO BYPASS LEVEE, 2019, P2-456851 Yolo County, California
2 1. Project Information:

West Sacramento Project, Yolo Bypass Levee, 2020, P2-456851 Yolo County, California

2. Project Description:

Produce construction contract documents for the West Sacramento Project, Yolo Bypass Levee. The Yolo Bypass levee will address seepage and levee stability problems at two location (segment AE & AA). a. 2016 GRR Recommendations:
 Segment AE
- Soil-Cement-Bentonite (SCB)/ Deep Mix Method (DMM)
 Segment AA
- Soil-Bentonite (SB) Open Trench
- Degrade Levee 1/3 of Landside Height
- Working platform width:
- Open Trench - minimum 30 feet
- DMM - minimum 50 feet
- Placement of Rock Slope Protection at
- Toe for Wind Wave as Necessary
- Reconstruct Levee to Existing Elevation
b. Preliminary Potential Design Solution (Based on 2020 geotechnical data analysis:
 Segment AE
- No mitigation necessary
 Segment AA
- Landside Seepage Berms in lieu of Wall

3. Project Roles & Responsibilities
An A/E design contract for West Sacramento Project, Yolo Bypass Levee was awarded to MGE, Inc. Sacramento, CA by the NFS, West Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency (WSAFCA). MGE was selected using a WSAFCA’s qualification based selection (QBS) process. USACE-SPK’s Geotechnical and Civil Lead participated in the QBS process. The Statement of Work (SOW) includes work for completion of 35%, 65%, 90% and final plans, specifications, Design Documentation Report (DDR), Engineering Documentation Report (EDR), MCACES Cost Estimate, and Engineering Considerations and Instructions for Field Personnel (ECIFP) for the Yolo Bypass Levee as part of the West Sacramento Project. The Yolo Bypass Levee extends along the Yolo Bypass Levee left bank from the confluence of the Sacramento Bypass and the Yolo Bypass south to the Navigation Levee (DWSC West).

Take Mapping shall also be submitted for this reach at the 65% submittal and finalized, as necessary, at the 90% submittal. The project participation agreement between USACE, DWR and WSAFCA provides a decision point for USACE to assume manage of design to completion at 65% design. MGE currently has Civil Works IDIQ contract with the USACE-SPK with adequate capacity if needed.

West Sacramento City CouncilAugust 5, 2026

West Sacramento City Council
August 5, 2026