believes that the project may have a significant effect, they should: (1) Identify the specific effect, (2) Explain why they believe the effect would occur, and (3) Explain why they believe the effect would be significant.
CEQA Guidelines, Section 15204(c), further advises, “Reviewers should explain the basis for their comments, and should submit data or references offering facts, reasonable assumptions based on facts, or expert opinion supported by facts in support of the comments. Pursuant to Section 15064, an effect shall not be considered significant in the absence of substantial evidence.”
Section 15204(d) also states, “Each responsible agency and trustee agency shall focus its comments on environmental information germane to that agency’s statutory responsibility.” Section 15204 (e) states, “This section shall not be used to restrict the ability of reviewers to comment on the general adequacy of a document or of the lead agency to reject comments not focused as recommended by this section.” Finally, CEQA does not require a lead agency to conduct every test or perform all research, study, and experimentation recommended or demanded by commenters. When responding to comments, lead agencies need only respond to potentially significant environmental issues and do not need to provide all information requested by reviewers, as long as a good-faith effort at full disclosure is made in the environmental document. 2164
February 2025 Page 3
2. Response to Comments
This section provides all written comments received on the circulated MND and the City’s response to each comment.
Comment letters and specific comments within those letters are assigned an alphanumeric designation for reference purposes. Where sections of the MND are excerpted in this document, they are indented. The following is a list of all comment letters received on the circulated MND during the 30-day public review period, which began October 30, 2024, and ended November 28, 2024.
Letter
Reference Commenting Person/Agency Date of Comment Page No.
Agencies and Organizations
A1 Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Amy McNeill, Engineering Project Manager November 7, 2024 4 A2 Caltrans, Janki Patel, Acting Branch Chief – Local Development Review November 13, 2024 9 Residents
R1 Monty Goddard November 25, 2024 15
2165
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
LETTER A1 – Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Amy McNeill, Engineering Project Manager (3 pages)
LETTER A1 - Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Amy McNeil!, Engineering Project Manager (3 pages)
JASON E. UHLEY
General Manager-Chief Engineer
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
951.955.1200
951.788.9965 FAX w,vw.rcllood.org
259578
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
November 7, 2024
City ofWildomar
Planning Department
23 873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 201
Wildomar, CA 92595
Attention: Matthew C. Bassi Re: CIP 099, Wildomar 20-Acre Park, APNs 380-050-025 and a portion of
APN 380-050-027
TI1e Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not nonnally recommend conditions for lai1d divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases.
District comments/recommendations for such cases are nonnally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan faci lities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plai1 system, ai1d District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, infonnation of a general nature is provided.
TI1e District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received October 30, 2024. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project witl1 respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or ai1y other such issue:
□ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plai1 facil ities, nor are other facilities ofregional interest proposed.
181 TI1is project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, Wildomar Master Drainage Plan Lateral C . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicaill shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the tenns and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with tl1e District ai1d ai1y other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required.
All regulatory penn its (and all documents pertaining thereto, e.g., Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plans, Conservation Plans/Easements) that are to be secured by the Applicant for both faci lity construction and maintenance shall be submitted to the District for review. The regulatory permits' tenns and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or finali zation of the regulatory pennits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety.
□ TI1is project proposes channels, stonn drains larger than 36 inches in dian1eter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension a District's facility, the District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request by the City. The Project Applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement establishing the tenns and conditions of inspection, operation, and maintenance with the District and ai1y other maintenance partners. Facilities must be constructed to District stai1dards, and District plai1 check and inspection will be required for District acceptance.
Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. The regulatory pennits' tenns and conditions shall be approved by the District prior to improvement plan approval, map recordation, or A1-1
2166
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 5
City ofWildomar
Re: CIP 099, Wildomar 20-Acre Park,
APNs 380-050-025 and a portion of
APN 380-050-027
- 2 - November 7, 2024
259578
finalization of the regulatory permits. There shall be no unreasonable constraint upon the District's ability to operate and maintain the flood control facility(ies) to protect public health and safety. □ TI1is project is located within the limits of the District's ____ Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted . If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid (in accordance with the Rules and Regulations for Administration of Area Drainage Plans) to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading or building A 1-1 pennits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual pem1it. 181 An encroachment pennit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, Wildomar Master Drainage Plan Lateral C and Lateral C- 1.
If a proposed stom1 drain connection exceeds the hydraulic perfonnance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required. For further infom1ation, contact the District's Encroachment Pcm1it Section at 95 1.955. 1266.
D TI1e District's previous comments are still valid.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document. and/or Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and with all other federal, state, and local environmental mies and regulations that may apply, such as, but not limited to, the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), Sections 404 and 40 I of the Clean Water Act, California Fish and Game Code Section 1602, and the Porter Cologne Water Quality Control Act.
TI1e District's action associated with the subject project triggers evaluation by the District with respect to the applicant's compliance with federal, state, and local environmental laws. For this project, the Lead Agency is the agency in the address above, and the District is a Responsible Agency under CEQA. The District, as a Copennittee under the MSHCP, needs to demonstrate that all District related activities, including the actions identified above. arc consistent with the MSHCP. This is typically achieved through dctcm1inations from the CEQA Lead Agency (if they are also a Co-peilllittee) for the project. For the MSHCP, the District's focus will be particular to Sections 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 6.1.4, 6.3.2, 7.3.7, 7.5.3, and Appendix C of the MSHCP. Please include consistency detem1ination statements from the Lead Agency/Co-pem1ittee for the project for each of these sections in the CEQA document. The District may also require that an applicant provide supporting technical documentation for environmental clearance.
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pennit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, rccordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has detennined that the project has been granted a pennit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other infonnation required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOM R) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy.
Very tmly yours,
~ tfk.l?dl
AMY4viCNEILL
Engineering Project Manager
EM:zl
CONT'D
A1-2
A1-3
2167
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
Bridgette Moore, Mayor, Dist. 4
Ashlee DePhillippo, Mayor Pro Tern, Dist. 5
Carlos Marquez, Council Member, Dist. 1
Joseph Morabito, Council Member, Dist. 3
Dustin Nigg, Council Member, Dist. 2
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
Reviewing Agencies/Interested Persons
Matthew C. Bassi, Community Development Director
October 30, 2024
23873 Clinton Keith Rd, Ste. 110
Wildomar, CA 92595
951.677.7751 Phone
951.698.1463 Fax
www.Cityotwildomar.org
[o)~@ g □ w [gl~
IJ\~ OCT 3 o 2024 -~
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD GONTROl
ANO WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
SUBJECT: Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Wildomar 20-Acre Park C P 099)
The City of Wildomar (City) is the lead agency for the preparation and review of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed 20-Acre Park Project. The City of Wildomar is proposing to develop a 20-acre park with 65 parking spaces; two driveways; and amenities including interpretive panel, raptor perch, solar lighting, bike racks, a butterfly/pollinator garden, information kiosks, drinking fountains, pet stations, a network of trails, picnic tables, exercise stations, a disk golf course, bird observation area, bench seating, a community garden, lawn playfield, shade structures, bridge crossing, gates, restrooms, and natural drainage swales. All files can be downloaded and reviewed from the City of Wildomar environmental documents center webpage at https://www .cityofwildomar.org/212/Environmental-Documents-Center.
The proposed project includes the following applications:
• Plot Plan (PP): Approval of the proposed project plans will become the plot plan; the proposed project will be developed in accordance with Chapter 17.16 of the Wildomar Municipal Code and onsite and offsite improvements consistent with the City's Parks Master Plan standards.
The City is requesting comments for the 20-Acre Park Project IS/MND. This notice is being sent to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, and other interested parties, along with a copy of the IS/MND and appendices (refer to lin!s, above). The public comment period for the IS/MND will begin on Wednesday, October 30, 2024, and conclude on Thursday, November 28, 2024. Written comments can be sentto Matthew C. Bassi, Community Development Director, City of Wildomar Community Development Department, 23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite #110, Wildomar, CA 92595. Comments can also be emailed to [email protected]. Should you have any questions or require additional information regarding this letter, please contact me at (951) 677-7751 , ext. 213, or email me at [email protected].
Sincerely,
/f?mttw-~,(,I.
Matthew Bassi
Community Development Director
Cc: Jason Farag, Public Works Director
Cameron Luna, Associate Engineer
2168
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 7
A1. Response to Comments from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Amy Mc Neill, Engineering Project Manager, dated November 7, 2024.
A1-1 The commenter states that the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The commenter states that the proposed project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities (Wildomar Master Drainage Plan Lateral C). The commenter states that the District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request by the City, and that the project applicant shall enter into a cooperative agreement with the District and other maintenance partners. The commenter states that all facilities must be constructed to District standards, and that District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. The commenter states that all regulatory permits for construction and operation shall be submitted to the District for review and approval. The commenter also indicates that an encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related to activities occurring within the District right of way or facilities, namely Wildomar Master Drainage Plan Lateral C and Lateral C-1. The commenter states that if proposed storm drain connections exceed the hydraulic performance of the existing drainage facilities, mitigation will be required.
The City’s Public Works Department will obtain all applicable permits and pay applicable administrative fees to the District. The City’s Public Works Department will submit all regulatory permits to the District for review and approval. If construction activities are to occur within the District’s right of way or facilities, the City’s Public Works Department will obtain an encroachment permit from the District. Given the passive nature of the park, exceeding the drainage facility capacity is not anticipated; as indicated in Section D.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, and Section D.19, Utilities and Service Systems, of the IS/MND, the proposed project would have a less than significant impact on stormwater drainage facilities due to the implementation of best management practices and permeable surfaces.
A1-2 The commenter states that the project proponent shall bear the responsibility for complying with all applicable mitigation measures defined in the CEQA document and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP), as well as all applicable federal, state, and local regulations. The commenter states that the District is a Responsible Agency, and as a Co-Permittee under the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the District needs to demonstrate that all District-related activities are consistent with the MSHCP. The commenter requests a consistency determination statement for the project for Sections 6.1.2 through 6.1.4, 6.3.2, 7.3.7, and 7.5.3 of the MSHCP in the CEQA document, and states that the District may request supporting technical documentation for environmental clearance.
The City’s Public Works Department will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations, as well as the mitigation measures in the MMRP, which is included as 2169
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
Appendix A of this Response to Comments document. ECORP Consulting, Inc. prepared a Biological Technical Report and Western Riverside County MSHCP Consistency Analysis in April 2024, which is included as Appendix 3 of the IS/MND document. Please refer to Appendix 3 as well as Section D.4, Biological Resources, of the IS/MND. As indicated in Impact 4.f, of the IS/MND, the project site is not within a Criteria Cell, Criteria Area Species Survey Area, Cell Group, Linkage Area, Core Area, Public Quasi-Public Conserved Lands, or Conservation Area, and therefore, Sections
7.3.7 and 7.5.3 of the MSHCP do not apply to the proposed project.
A1-3 The commenter states that the project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, and if the project site involves Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplains, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and the applicant should obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and LOMR.
As indicated in Section D.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the IS/MND, the proposed project is subject to the requirements of the NPDES. Additionally, as shown in Figure 5, Flood Zone Map, of the IS/MND, the western portion of the site, which generally corresponds to the location of the drainage channel, is within the FEMA designated Flood Zone A. Although the proposed project would increase impervious surfaces onsite, the majority of the project site is designed to be permeable and preserve the natural topography to the extent possible, including the preservation of the natural drainage courses. The natural topography of the proposed project would reduce impacts from onor off-site flooding. The drainage channel would be maintained by the City which would ensure that flooding impacts are not significantly changed from the existing condition.
Additionally, no habitable structures would be proposed onsite, and the proposed project would not substantially change the drainage onsite, including the drainage channel.
Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur, and the preparation of additional studies and the obtaining of a CLOMR or LOMR are not required. 2170
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 9
LETTER A2 – Caltrans, Janki Patel, Acting Branch Chief – Local Development Review (3 pages) LETTER A2 - Caltrans, Janki Patel, Acting Branch Chief - Local Development Review (3 pages)
CALIFORNIA STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
California Department of Transportation
DISTRICT 8
464 WEST 4TH STREET
SAN BERNARDINO C A, 92401
1909) 925-7520
www.dot.ca.gov
November 13, 2024
City of Wildomar
Community Development Department
Attn: Matthew C. Bassi
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite # 11 0,
Wildomar, CA 92595
GAVIN NEWSOM. GOVERNOR
Route & Postmile #: 115- PM 14.74
Cross Street: Near Palomar St. &
S Pasadena St.
GTS ID: 34403
SCH: 2024101272
Subject: 20-Acre Passive Park (CIP 099) IS/MND Review - East of Palomar Street and south of Gierson Avenue, Wlldomar, CA 92595; APN: 380-050-025 and a portion of 380-050-027.
The California Department of Transportation (Caltra ns) Local Development Review (LOR) unit has completed the evaluation of the 20-Acre Passive Park (CIP 099) Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The project site is located east of Pa lomar Street and south of Gierson Avenue, with a drainage channel to the west. The site comprises a 20-acre triangular parcel, including the entirety of Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 380-050-025 and a portion of APN 380-050-027. Interstate 15 (1- 15) A2-1 is situated approximately 0.5 miles east of the project site.
The proposed project involves the development of a 20-acre passive park, featuring 65 parking spaces distributed across two lots: one located in the northern portion of the site, accessible via Gierson Avenue, and the other at the southwestern corner along Palomar Street. The park will include a variety of amenities, such as a n interpretive panel, raptor perch, solar lighting. bike racks, a butterfly/pollinator garden, information kiosks, drinking fountains, pet stations. a network of trai ls, picnic ta bles, exercise stations, a disc golf course, bird observation areas, benc h seating, a community garden, a lawn playfield, shade structures, a bridge crossing, gates, restrooms, and natural drainage swales.
Based o n the information provided in the Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration, we are providing the following comments:
2171
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
Traffic Operations
l . Traffic Impact Study (TIS): Since the project is located near a freeway facility, please provide the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) report for our review.
2. Ramp Merge/Diverge Analysis: Please include an a nalysis of the ramp merge a nd diverge conditions at the I- 15/Wildomar Trail in both the northbound and southbound directions. A2.-2 This will help determine any potential impacts of the development at this location.
3. VMT Calculations: Kindly include Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) calculations in the report.
4. Queuing Analysis: Please include queuing ana lysis ca lculations to assess potentia l impacts on traffic flow.
Active Transportation
Upon reviewing the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 20-acre passive park in Wildomar, several recommendations have been identified to improve bicycle and pedestrian circulation, as well as to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) to the park's destinations.
It is noted on page 108 that there are severa l multimodal access points for users to reach the park, including Riverside Transit Agency bus route 23, Gierson Ave., Palomar St. along with new a nd existing pedestrian access points/ bridges within the parcel. Some of these are hig hlig hted in the graphic on page 10.
There appears to be an inconsistency of the pavement surface of the parking lots between the text on page 8, as well as the graphic on page 10. In the "Sustainable Design Features" section on page 8, the SW parking lot is to be made of "porous concrete/ asphalt", however the graphic o n page 10 states that the lot would have a gravel surface. A2-3 Provided that the parking lots wil l be made of gravel (as indicated on the graphic on page 10), it may provide a n impediment to bicyclists and pedestrians, notably to those arriving using wheeled devices (including, but not limited to wheelchairs, mobility scooters, strollers, (twowheeled) scooters, skates, skateboards, bicycle trailers and pulled wagons). The parking lot design should incorporate methods for those a rriving using wheeled devices need not to travel thru gravel in order to reach the park, whether that be a smoother surface that can meet ADA standards that a llow for ease of passage or other solutions. Also, the design of transitions between gravel lots and paved surfaces should minimize kickback of gravel by vehicles onto surrounding areas including (but not limited to) sidewalks, driveway openings, bicycle lanes and roadway shoulders/ surfaces to minimize occurrences of slip and fa ll incidents.
Additionally for ingress a nd egress of bicyclists and pedestrians to the parcel, it is noted that the existing bridges will remain. Given the construction of the park adjacent to and connecting to the parcel occupied to the Anne Sullivan School, there may be an opportunity to explore opportunities to con nect the school to these access points, via existing bridges. In addition, its proximity to an assisted living facility should merit an exploration of access point(s) to the passive park to reduce potentia l VMT of those residents who may otherwise c hoose to drive to the park's parking lots. Summarily, it is encouraged tha t the applicant considers access points to adjacent parcels, given their c urrent la nd uses as it is encouraged to consider a design where bicyclists a nd pedestrians have more tha n o ne accessible path of travel to enter this parcel. Such measures would reduce the likelihood of non-vehicular visitors having to enter directly from vehicle driveways or traverse ( or create desire paths thru) unpaved and uneven surfaces.
The IS/MND document states that bicycle racks and lockers would be installed in both parking lots. It is encouraged that amenities to facilitate safety for the bicyclist and property be 2 A2-4
2172
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 11
considered in the design of the bicycle racks. Bicycle tools, pumps and other security measures I A2-5 (noting the provision of electricity to the site) that may include surveillance equipment wou ld CONT' improve safety for users arriving by wheeled devices. D Per the Wildomar Active Transportation Plan, it would be expected that the buildout of the park should include community trails, sidewalks and bicycle faci lities as proposed in the Plan to allow for users to arrive to the park outside of a motorized vehicle. In addition, a transit stop relocation A2.--6 or addition should be considered for the existing RT A bus route 23 to facilitate access to the park's SW entrance.
Equitable Access
If any Ca ltrans facilities are impacted by the project, those facilities must meet American Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards after project completion. As well, the project must maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction . These access considerations support Caltrans' equity mission to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable transportation network for all users.
Caltrans Encroachment Permit
Please be advised that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans' ROW requires a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit. As part of the encroachment permit submittal process, you may be asked by the Office of Encroachment Permits to submit a completed encroachment permit application package, digital set of plans clearly delineating Caltrans' ROW, digital copy of signed, dated and stamped (include stamp expiration date) traffic control plans, this comment letter, your response to the comment letter, and any other applicable documents that may be requested by the Office of Encroachment Permits. Your application package or submittal inquiry may be emailed to [email protected].
For information regarding the Encroachment Permit application and submittal requirements, contact:
Caltrans Office of Encroachment Permits
464 West 4th Street, Basement, MS 619
San Bernardino, CA 92401-1400
(909) 383-4526
http://www.dot.ca .gov / hq/tra ffops/develo pserv /permits / Tha nk you again for including Caltrans in the review process. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, or for future notifications and requests for review of new projects, please email [email protected] or call 909-925-7520.
Sincerely,
Janki Patel
Acting Branch Chief - Local Development Review
Division of Transportation Planning
Caltrans District 8
3 A2-7
A2-8
2173
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
A2. Response to Comments from Caltrans, Janki Patel, Acting Branch Chief – Local Development Review, dated November 13, 2024.
A2-1 The commenter provides a summary of the project description and location.
The commenter’s summary of the project description and location is correct; this comment does not raise an issue with the analysis or conclusions of the MND, no further response is necessary.
A2-2 The commenter states a Traffic Impact Study (TIS), ramp merge/diverge analysis, Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) calculations, and queuing analysis should be provided.
The proposed project is a passive park and does not include active uses, such as sports fields/facilities. As stated in Section D.17, Transportation, of the IS/MND, per the City’s VMT guidelines states that VMT analyses are not required for projects that generate 110 trips or less; the proposed project would generate 16 weekday trips (1 AM peak trip and 2 PM peak trips), 39 Saturday trips (6 peak hour trips), and 44 Sunday trips (6 peak hour trips). Additionally, the proposed project is a community-serving use and would reduce the need for residents to travel outside of the City for recreational facilities. As such, the need for a TIS, VMT, or other studies is not warranted given the passive nature of the park. Additionally, it should be noted that the City intends to make improvements to the Wildomar Trail freeway interchange and are preparing an encroachment permit application to restripe Wildomar Trail to alleviate existing congestion from vehicles traveling to Interstate 15 southbound. The City is working on interim traffic signals for the interchange, as a short-term measure, to improve operations at the Wildomar Trail interchange. The City and Caltrans corresponded via email, where the City provided Caltrans with the trip generation calculations for the proposed project. Per Caltrans’ email on December 10, 2024, Caltrans indicated that the City does not need to provide Caltrans with a TIS, and there were no further comments.
A2-3 The commenter states that the IS/MND identifies improvements to bicycle and pedestrian circulation, and that the site is proximate to multimodal facilities. The commenter states that there is an inconsistency with regards to the surface of the southwestern parking lot—the text of the IS/MND states the parking lot would be porous concrete/asphalt and the site plan graphic states it would be gravel. The commenter states that if the parking lots would be gravel, it may impede access for wheeled devices (wheelchairs, bicycles, scooters, strollers, etc.), and states that the parking lots should incorporate methods for those using wheeled devices for ease and to ensure ADA-accessibility. The commenter states that the design should minimize kickback of gravel to minimize fall incidents.
The final design of the proposed project would meet ADA requirements, and any changes in the design to comply with ADA regulations would not affect the conclusions of IS/MND. Therefore, no further response is necessary as the comment does not raise an 2174
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 13
issues with the analysis or conclusions of the IS/MND. The ADA parking stalls at both parking lots, and sidewalk ramp on Gierson Avenue would be concrete; both parking lots would have gravel surfaces for the non-ADA parking stalls. Refer to Section 3, Revisions to the IS/MND, which revises the inconsistency about the parking lot surface.
A2-4 The commenter states that there may be an opportunity to create connections/access points from the adjacent parcels, Anne Sullivan School, and assisted living facility to the park to reduce the potential VMT of those residents/users.
The existing bridges provide access from the adjacent Anne Sullivan School to the project site. One bridge is vehicular/emergency access, and the other is a pedestrian bridge. The City considered adding a connection from Billie Ann Road, however, there is a significant elevation difference and ADA access from Billie Ann Road would not have been feasible.
The City also considered adding a connection from the northern parking lot to Refa/Charles Street, but this land is not owned by the City. The comment does not raise an issue with the analysis or conclusions of the MND, no further response is necessary.
A2-5 The commenter encourages safety features at the bike racks, such as surveillance equipment, bicycle tools, pumps, and other security measures.
The comment does not raise an issue with the analysis or conclusions of the MND, no further response is necessary. This comment will be forwarded to decision-makers for their consideration.
A2-6 The commenter states that per the Wildomar Active Transportation Plan, it is expected that the park would include trails, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities to allow for users to arrive to the park without motorized vehicles, and states that a transit stop relocation or addition should be considered for the Riverside Transit Authority Bus Route 23 to create access to the southwestern parking lot.
As mentioned in Section I, Introduction, of the IS/MND, the proposed project would construct frontage improvements on Gierson Avenue and Palomar Street which would include sidewalks. The IS/MND indicated that the nearest bus stop to the park is approximately 0.5-mile; however, this bus stop is approximately 790 feet north of the southwestern parking lot. Refer to Section 3, Revisions to the IS/MND, which revises the typographical error.
A2-7 The commenter states that if any Caltrans facilities are impacted, they must meet ADA standards and maintain bicycle and pedestrian access during construction.
Project construction would occur within the project site boundaries and include frontage improvements along Gierson Avenue and Palomar Street. No Caltrans facilities would be impacted.
2175
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
A2-8 The commenter states that any permanent work or temporary traffic control that encroaches onto Caltrans’ right of way will require a Caltrans-issued encroachment permit.
See response to comment A2-7.
2176
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 15
LETTER R1 – Monty Goddard (7 pages)
LETTER R1 - Monty Goddard (7 pages)
On Nov 25, 2024, at 2:38 PM, MONTY GODDARD
wrote:
Mat, Please use this copy. My initial email a few moments ago was missing the "bolding" of one of my comments. Sorry for the confusion.
R, Monty
Dear Matthew Bassi,
I appreciate the opportunity to provide comment on the INITIAL STUDY /MIT/GA TED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE WJLDOMAR 20-ACRE PARK PROJECT.
My comment/questions are "bracketed" in [bold]. One general comment/question precedes my specific comments on this
R1-1
2177
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
document. All my specific comments cite the document's
applicable page number and section/subsection "title" and quotes of the verbiage in question.
General comment/question:
Not addressed in this document is the potential for the city to condone after dark use of this park. Is this document's "silence" on potential after dark events in the Page 102 - "Park Noise" section, and elsewhere in this Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration, the city's assurance after dark use will not occur?
Specific comment/questions:
"This project proposes to construct a 20-acre passive park1" "Footnote 1 Passive recreation refers to recreational activities that do not require prepared facilities like sports fields or pavilions (emphasis added)." [Quoting from: "Pavilion Definition & Meaning - MerriamWebster -... the word pavilion, ... can mean a large tent, a part of a building, or a structure in a park." Why does this alleged "passive park" have a pavilion, aka, large shade structure?]
"City-owned parks are closed nightly by security guards, following a walkthrough of the park, documentation of hazards/vandalism, informing individuals who are still at the park at closing time to vacate, locking public restrooms, and securing barrier gates. City-authorized security conducts after-hours monitoring of park locations, including periodic checks and an electronic reporting system that generates a report. Periodically, local law enforcement is temporarily stationed at parks; both police and fire officials are informed on emergency access points at City parks during nonoperational hours." [Unfortunately, these policies, as reassuring as they sound, are not consistently followed at our existing city-owned parks. Definitely not Wind song Park. City
contracted security guards often do not fully comply with their contract requirements. They also cannot be contacted R1-1
CONTD
R1 -2
R1-3
2178
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 17
by residents about park security issues, so the default for park security becomes our limited number of deputy sheriff's contracted for by the City of Wildomar. It is very na'ive to think it will be a trivial task to secure this project's 20-acre park. Can you imagine the time it will take each evening, and periodically overnight, to implement this policy in a 20-acre unlit wooded park? Park security, including the Gierson Ave extension, is my number one concern. This document should substantially address park security and the related impact on "Public Services".]
"Certain land uses are particularly sensitive to noise and vibration. These uses include residences, schools, hospital facilities, houses of worship, and R1-3
CONT'D
open space/recreation areas where quiet environments are necessary for the enjoyment, public health, and safety of the community. The nearest sensitive R 1-4 receptors to the project site are single-family residential uses to the east [ADD - and north.] A senior living community is located to the northwest, Anne Sullivan Preschool & Transitional Kindergarten to the west, and singlefamily residential uses are to the south and west of the project site.
"The nearest noise sensitive receptors are the residential uses located directly east [ADD - and north] of the project site. Operational noise sources associated with the proposed project include recreational and park activities."
Pages 101 & 102 - Traffic Noise
"Typically, a doubling in existing traffic volumes due to project traffic would result in a 3 dBA increase of existing traffic noise levels. Based on trip generation rates for a park use, implementation of the project would produce at most 44 new trips along the local roadway segments on any given day, 22 entering and 22 exiting. However, the project proposes to provide up to 65 parking stalls when complete. Assuming all 65 parking stalls fill in a day, the resulting increase in daily traffic volumes would be 130 new trips (arriving and leaving park) due to project implementation. Existing traffic volumes on R1-5
R1-6
2179
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
project area roadways are more than 130 trips a day, [This is not true for the stretch of Gierson Ave at the planned main entrance to the park. It is less than 10 trips per day.] and the project would not cause a doubling of existing traffic volumes with project implementation. [This is not true for the stretch of Gierson Ave at the planned main entrance to the park.] This would not result in a 3 dBA increase over existing conditions. [It most certainly would for the stretch of Gierson Ave at the planned main entrance to the park!] Since the proposed project would not result in a 3 dBA increase, impacts would be less than significant." [Not correct for the stretch of Gierson Ave at the planned main entrance to the park.]
" ... The proposed project is not anticipated to host any programming or largescale events that could potentially disrupt nearby residential areas. However, the potential for gatherings for celebrations (e.g., wedding, birthday) could consist of music or a portable public address system." [How are these types of events compatible with a "Passive Park? Refers back to Page 1 comment - Why does this passive park have a pavilion, aka, large shade structure?]
"These types of events would be required to comply with Section
9.48.060(D), Sound-Amplifying Equipment and Live Music, of the City Municipal Code restricting live music or amplified sound equipment between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and not be audible to the human ear at a distance greater than 200 feet. Section 9.48.070 of the City Municipal Code does allow an exception to be requested for single events through an application process." [Again, how are these types of events especially ones requiring" ... an (noise level) exception to be requested for single events" through an application
process", compatible with a "Passive Park? Refers back to
pavilion, aka large shade structure?]
"Therefore, project operational noise would not exceed daytime noise standards of 55 dBA Leq (per Section 9.48.040, General Sound Level Standards, of the Wildomar Municipal Code) and impacts would be less than significant." [Not true with the potential for gatherings for R1-6
CONT'D
R1-7
2180
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 19
celebrations (e.g., wedding, birthday) which could consist of R1-7 music or a portable public address system with sound/noise CONT'D emanating therefrom at levels allowed by exception to the city's noise ordinance.]
"Traffic enforcement is provided in this area of Riverside County by the California Highway Patrol, with additional support from local Riverside County Sheriff's Department personnel." [You need to fix this statement. While not totally false, it does not belong in a City of Wildomar environmental document. It should contain
these actual facts; traffic enforcement on all city owned streets is the responsibility of what the city likes to call "their" Police Department, which is in reality, contracted Riverside County Sheriff's Department personnel. The CHP within Wildomar city Limits is only responsible for Interstate
15.]
"The proposed project would not induce population growth in the area and no residential uses are proposed. The proposed project would serve the projected growth, and therefore, the proposed project would not be expected to substantially increase the demand for police protection services.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant." [The basis for this "Less than significant impact" is based on flawed Logic. This park will certainly impact/increase police calls for service independent of population growth. The City of Wildomar is already "under policed". Sixteen plus years after
incorporation, and 9,000 plus, additional residents,
Wildomar contracts with the RSO for the same number of law enforcement personnel it did in year one of incorporation; seventeen. Unlike in 2008, only 15 of the 17 are now
warranted weapon caring deputies, and two of these are
assigned to the Special Enforcement Team at the Lake
Elsinore RSO station. This Leaves a grand total of 13 armed deputies spread across 24 hours per day, 7 days per week to actually patrol or respond to calls for service. NOT GOOD, R1-8
R1-9
2181
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
and this park will only add to the problem. Residents
throughout Wildomar will suffer as their calls for service experience ever increasing response times. Substantial
reconsideration should be given to this "Police Protection" element before reaching a conclusion of "no significant impact".]
Page131-Noise
"However, the proposed project would not cause a doubling of existing traffic volumes with project implementation, and project operational noise would R1-9
CONT'D
not exceed daytime noise standards of 55 d BA Leq. Therefore, the proposed R 1-1 o project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact related to operational noise. [Not totally correct. Please see my pages 101 & 102, "Traffic Noise" comments.]
"Implementation of the proposed project, in combination with other existing, planned, proposed, approved, and reasonably foreseeable development in the immediate area, may increase the demand for public services such as fire and police protection. However, as a standard condition of approval, project applicants/developers are required to pay development impact fees to fund the expansion of such services." [Where to begin? 1st - The "developer" of this project is the city. Will the city be required to pay development impact fees (DIF) to itself? 2nd - DIF are for adding to required infrastructure like a new fire or police station, not for hiring more fire or police. 3rd - The mechanism employed by the city to pay for additional public services, like fire and law enforcement personnel, is by taxing the private owners of newly developed homes,
apartments and businesses. It is noteworthy, the city has implemented these annual and ever-increasing taxes on new developments beginning in 2013 and has yet to add one new "body" to its "Police Department" beyond the 17 law
enforcement personnel it had year one of incorporation.] R1-11
2182
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 21
Respectfully submitted,
Monty Goddard
Long Suffering Resident
City of Wildomar
2183
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
R1. Response to Comments from Monty Goddard, dated November 25, 2024.
R1-1 The commenter states that the IS/MND does not address the potential for the City to condone use of the park after dark and asks if the park would be open for use at nighttime.
Under the “Operation” heading in Section III, Project Description (pages 8-9), of the IS/MND states that City-owned parks are closed nightly by security guards who inform individuals who are still at the park at closing time to vacate, and also lock public restrooms and secure barrier gates. Additionally, City-authorized security conducts after-hours monitoring of park locations, and City maintenance staff and contractors are required to submit all concerns, incidents, and reports to the Community Services Department. Per the City’s standards, all parks, including the proposed project, would not be open for use at night.
R1-2 The commenter, in reference to the footnote on page 1 of the IS/MND, asks why the proposed project would include a pavilion if it is a passive park.
The footnote states that “passive recreation refers to recreational activities that do not require prepared facilities like sports fields or pavilions. Passive recreational activities place minimal stress on a site’s resources; as a result, they can provide ecosystem service benefits and are highly compatible with natural resource protection” (emphasis added). The proposed project would not include active uses, such as sports fields or pavilions, but instead is intended to have a minimal impact on the site’s resources, for example, the proposed project includes sustainable design features, native landscaping and preservation of existing vegetation, and enhancements to the drainage features.
R1-3 The commenter is concerned that City-contracted security guards may not be able to adequately secure the park given that it is 20 acres in size and unlit. The commenter states that security guards at existing parks are unresponsive, and therefore, residents have to contact the sheriff's department. The commenter states park security, including the Gierson Avenue extension, is a concern, and the IS/MND should address park security in the Public Services section.
Park safety is a social issue, and therefore, is not analyzed in the IS/MND. CEQA requires an analysis of a project’s physical impacts on the environment. This comment will be forwarded to decision-makers for their review and consideration.
R1-4 The commenter states that the location of sensitive receptors on page 96 of the IS/MND should include the parcels to the north of the site.
The parcels directly north of the site are vacant; however, there are residential uses to the northeast of the project site. Refer to Section 3, Revisions to the IS/MND, which adds a reference to these receptors in the paragraph on page 96. Please note that the sentence in reference states, “The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are single-family 2184
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 23
residential land uses to the east” (emphasis added). The single-family residential uses to the east are nearest to the site because they are directly adjacent to the site’s boundaries.
R1-5 The commenter states that the location of sensitive receptors on page 101 of the IS/MND should include the parcels to the north of the site.
The parcels directly north of the site are vacant. The sentence in reference states, “The nearest noise sensitive receptors are the residential uses located directly east of the project site” (emphasis added). The single-family residential uses to the east are nearest to the site because they are adjacent to the site’s boundaries. Therefore, no revisions to this section of the IS/MND is warranted because no other sensitive receptors are directly adjacent to the site.
R1-6 The commenter refers to “Traffic Noise” on pages 101 and 102 of the IS/MND and states that the statement about the existing traffic volumes on the project area roadways being more than 130 trips a day is not true as there are less than 10 trips per day at Gierson Avenue. The commenter states that the statements about the proposed project not doubling existing traffic or resulting in an increase of 3 dBA are not true.
The commenter does not provide substantial evidence for these claims. Additionally, given the minimal number of trips the proposed project would generate, a doubling of traffic volumes (and therefore, traffic noise) would not occur. Additionally, it is unlikely that park users who do not live in the neighborhoods to the east and northeast of the project site would use the Gierson Avenue entrance; therefore, the doubling of traffic volumes along Gierson Avenue is unlikely.
R1-7 The commenter refers to “Park Noise” on page 102 of the IS/MND and asks how the potential for celebrations with music and a public address system are compatible with a passive park, asks why there will be a pavilion at the passive park, and states that the statement that operational noise would not exceed daytime noise standards is not true for events that would consist of music and a public address system.
Refer to response to comment R1-2 about pavilions. Passive parks do not eliminate the use of a park for gatherings and celebrations, but rather, passive parks place minimal stress on a site’s resources, so they can provide ecosystem service benefits that are compatible with the protection of natural resources. As indicated in the IS/MND on page 102, any gatherings onsite would be required to comply with Section 9.48.060(D), SoundAmplifying Equipment and Live Music, and Section 9.48.070, Exceptions, of the Wildomar Municipal Code, which would ensure that noise impacts are reduced.
Additionally, as the proposed park would be closed after dark and with the City-authorized security conducting after-hours monitoring, the potential for late night gatherings and parties would be eliminated.
2185
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
R1-8 The commenter states that the statement about traffic enforcement on page 105 of the IS/MND should be revised to state that traffic enforcement within City-owned streets is the responsibility of the City’s police department and the California Highway Patrol is responsible for traffic enforcement within I-15.
This sentence in the IS/MND does not specify which agencies enforce traffic rules within the different roadways of the City. This statement is not incorrect, and therefore, no revisions are required. Per California Penal Code 830.1, the authority of peace officers extends to any place within the political subdivision that employs the peace officer or in which the peace officer serves. Therefore, traffic enforcement within City-owned streets is the responsibility of the City’s police department and the California Highway Patrol is responsible for traffic enforcement within I-15.
R1-9 The commenter states that the statement on page 105 about the proposed project not inducing growth, and therefore, would not result in a significant impact to police services, is flawed as the proposed project would increase police calls and the City’s police department is understaffed.
The proposed project is a community-serving use and would provide recreational uses for existing residents of the City. Because the proposed project is not a growth-inducing use, such as residential uses, the proposed project would not result in an increase in residents.
Police staffing is based on population not, land uses. While the proposed project would increase calls for service, compared to existing conditions, the increase in calls for service would not substantially increase the demand for police services. Additionally, Cityauthorized security conducts after-hours monitoring which would reduce demands for police services. It should be noted that CEQA requires an analysis of a project’s impacts on the environment, and is not focused on social issues, such as security. This comment will be forwarded to decision-makers for their consideration.
R1-10 The commenter states that the noise conclusion, that the proposed project would not double traffic volumes and operational noise would not exceed 55 dBA Leq, on page 131 of the IS/MND, is not correct.
See responses to comments R1-6 and R1-7.
R1-11 The commenter states that the public services conclusion on page 131 of the IS/MND, that the proposed project would not increase demand for public services and that developers would be required to pay development impact fees, is not applicable as the City will not pay impact fees and such fees fund infrastructure and do not hire new personnel.
The comment states that the mechanism to pay for the hiring of new personnel is through taxes, and that since 2013, the City has not hired new law enforcement to supplement its department.
2186
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
February 2025 Page 25
The commenter asks if the City would pay development impact fees to itself. This section of the IS/MND refers to cumulative impacts, and the paragraph in question states:
“Implementation of the proposed project, in combination with other existing, planned, proposed, approved, and reasonably foreseeable development in the immediate area, may increase the demand for public services such as fire and police protection. However, as a standard condition of approval, project applicants/developers are required to pay development impact fees to fund the expansion of such services. Development of any future public service facilities would be subject to CEQA review prior to approval that would identify and address any resulting impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less than cumulatively considerable impact on public services” (emphasis added).
This statement about paying development impact fees is not in regard to the City paying such fees, but rather, future developers/applicants. The City would not, and cannot, pay impact fees to itself. The commenter is correct that the payment of impact fees would fund infrastructure and not the hiring of new personnel. CEQA requires an analysis of a project’s physical impacts on the environment. Therefore, unless the increase in personnel is so significant that new infrastructure would need to be constructed, CEQA does not require an analysis of the impact on personnel itself, as this is not a physical impact on the environment. Refer to response to comment R1-9. The commenter’s statement that the City has implemented tax increases but has not added new personnel to supplement its police department is not an environmental issue, but rather, a social issue. This comment will be forwarded to decision-makers for their consideration. 2187
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Response to Comments
This page intentionally left blank.
2188
February 2025 Page 27
3. Revisions to the IS/MND
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This section contains revisions to the IS/MND based upon (1) additional or revised information required to prepare a response to a specific comment; (2) applicable updated information that was not available at the time of IS/MND publication; and/or (3) typographical errors. This section also includes additional mitigation measures to fully respond to commenter concerns as well as provide additional clarification to mitigation requirements included in the IS/MND. The provision of these additional mitigation measures does not alter any impact significance conclusions as disclosed in the IS/MND. Changes made to the IS/MND are identified here in strikeout text to indicate deletions and in underlined text to signify additions.
3.2 IS/MND REVISIONS IN RESPONSE TO WRITTEN COMMENTS
Pages 7 and 8 of the IS/MND, Section III, Project Description, has been revised to correct a typographical error.
Access and Parking
Access to the project site would be provided via four access points: one vehicular access at the northern portion of the site via Gierson Avenue, one vehicular access at the southwestern portion of the site via Palomar Street, and two pedestrian access points via the existing bridge crossings along the western portion of the site. The proposed project would add another bridge to connect the new parking lot on Palomar Street to the project site. The City has established an Emergency Access easement at the existing bridge crossing from the Anne Sullivan access road. The easement allows for permanent emergency access and temporary access from Palomar Street (Wildomar 2023). Emergency access to the site would be provided via the driveways at Gierson Avenue and Palomar Street.
The proposed project would include a total of approximately 65 parking spaces. The northern gravel parking lot would include a total of 40 spaces, with three ADA spaces and eight electric vehicle (EV) spaces, and would provide a connection to an overflow gravel parking lot that would accommodate weekend visits or special events. The southwestern parking lot would include approximately 25 parking spaces with two ADA spaces and four EV spaces. Bike racks and lockers would be included in both parking lots. Both parking lots would consist of gravel surfaces, with the exception of the ADA parking stalls which would be concrete.
At project completion, the proposed project is anticipated to generate a total of 16-weekday trips with one peak AM trip and two peak PM trips, a total of 39 Saturday trips with six peak hour trips, and a total of 44 Sunday trips with six peak hour trips.
2189
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Revisions to the IS/MND
Water/Sewer/Solid Waste
Water and sewer services would be provided by Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, electrical power services by Southern California Edison, and natural gas services by Southern California Gas. The project site is currently vacant and therefore would require the installation of all utilities per the requirements of the service providers. Additionally, all solid waste onsite will be handled, collected, transported, and disposed of in accordance with the City’s requirements.
Sustainable Design Features
The project proposed would be designed to preserve the natural topography to the extent possible, including the preservation of natural drainage courses throughout the project site as well as constructing a pedestrian bridge, stairs, and culvert crossing, instead of grading. The proposed project would primarily use reclaimed water for irrigation. Decomposed granite would be used on the trails, and the northern parking lots would consist of gravel, and the southwestern parking lot would consist of porous concrete/asphalt with the exception of the ADA parking stalls which would be concrete. The proposed project would also enhance the existing natural drainage swales by incorporating native plantings which would help to reduce water flow, minimize erosion, and filter pollutants. Other sustainable design features would include erosion and sediment control, native soils for trails, and solar panels for lighting.
13. Noise
Issues, would the project result in:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or
permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
vicinity of the project in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
2190
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. revisions to IS/MND
February 2025 Page 29
Issues, would the project result in:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant Impact
with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a
private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
Noise modeling was prepared by PlaceWorks in May 2024 (PlaceWorks 2024c) which is summarized herein and included as Appendix 7.
Environmental Setting
Noise is defined as unwanted sound. It is known to have several adverse effects on people, including hearing loss, speech and sleep interference, physiological responses, and annoyance. Based on these known adverse effects of noise, the federal government, State of California, and City of Wildomar have established criteria to protect public health and safety and to prevent disruption of certain human activities. Additional information on noise and vibration fundamentals and applicable regulations are contained in Appendix 7.
Sensitive Receptors
Certain land uses are particularly sensitive to noise and vibration. These uses include residences, schools, hospital facilities, houses of worship, and open space/recreation areas where quiet environments are necessary for the enjoyment, public health, and safety of the community. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are single-family residential uses to the east. A senior living community is located to the northwest, Anne Sullivan Preschool & Transitional Kindergarten to the west, and single-family residential uses are to the northeast, south, and west of the project site. 2191
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099) RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Revisions to the IS/MND
14. Transportation
Issues, would the project:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or
policy addressing the circulation system,
including transit, roadway, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities?
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA
Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a
geometric design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
a) Less Than Significant Impact.
Public Transit, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Plans
The project area is served by RTA bus Route 23 which provides service for the cities of Wildomar, Murrieta, and Temecula (RTA 2024). The closest bus stop is the Palomar and Wildomar Pasadena bus stop, which is approximately 0.5-mile 790 feet north of the project site, at the intersection of Palomar Street and Pasadena Street.
2192
February 2025 | Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program State Clearinghouse No. 2024101272
20-ACRE PASSIVE PARK PROJECT (CIP 099)
City of Wildomar
Prepared for:
City of Wildomar
Matthew Bassi, Community Development Director
23873 Clinton Keith Road, Suite 110
Wildomar, California 92595
951.677.7751
Prepared by:
PlaceWorks
Mark Teague, AICP, Managing Principal
3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100
Santa Ana, CA 92707
714.966.9220
[email protected]
www.placeworks.com
2193
2194
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099 ) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
Table of Contents
February 2025 Page i
Section Page
1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM............................1
1.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................................................2
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .....................................................................................................................2
2. MITIGATION MONITORING PROCESS......................................................................................... 5
2.1 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION..........................................................5
2.2 CITY OF WILDOMAR ....................................................................................................................................5
2.3 MITIGATION MONITORING TEAM .......................................................................................................5
2.4 DISPUTE RESOLUTION ...............................................................................................................................6
2.5 ENFORCEMENT..............................................................................................................................................6
3. MITIGATION MONITORING REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................. 7
3.1 PREMONITORING MEETING ...................................................................................................................7
3.2 CATEGORIZED MITIGATION MEASURES/MATRIX .......................................................................7
3.3 IN-FIELD MONITORING.............................................................................................................................7
3.4 DATABASE MANAGEMENT .......................................................................................................................7
3.5 COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTORS..............................................................................................7
3.6 LONG-TERM MONITORING......................................................................................................................7
4. MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTS ....................................................................................... 23
4.1 FIELD CHECK REPORT .............................................................................................................................23
4.2 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLIANCE REPORT ....................................................................................23
4.3 DISPUTE/ENFORCEMENT REPORT ....................................................................................................23
5. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................................... 25
6. REPORT PREPARATION ............................................................................................................. 27
6.1 LIST OF PREPARERS....................................................................................................................................27 List of Tables
Table Page
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements ................................................................................................ 8 2195
2196
February 2025 Page 1
1. Introduction
1.1 PURPOSE OF MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM
The City of Wildomar (City) is the lead agency for the proposed 20-Acre Passive Park Project and has developed this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) as a vehicle for monitoring mitigation measures outlined in the 20-Acre Passive Park Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), State Clearinghouse No. 2024101272. As the lead agency, the City is responsible for implementing the MMRP, which has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the California Public Resources Code, as follows:
(a) When making findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply:
(1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adopted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead or responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. (2) The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based.
The MMRP consists of mitigation measures that avoid, reduce, and/or fully mitigate potential environmental impacts. The mitigation measures have been identified and recommended through preparation of the IS/MND and drafted to meet the requirements of Public Resources Code, Section 21081.6. 2197
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
1. Introduction
1.2 PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1.2.1 Project Location
The project site is east of Palomar Street and south of Gierson Avenue. To the west of the project site is a drainage channel. The project site consists of a 20-acre parcel forming a triangular shape and is comprised of all of Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 380-050-025 and a portion of APN 380-050-027.
1.2.2 Proposed Improvements
The project proposes to construct a 20-acre passive park with 65 parking spaces in two lots, one in the northern portion of the project site via Gierson Avenue and the other at the southwestern corner of the site along Palomar Street. The proposed project would include amenities such as an interpretive panel, raptor perch, solar lighting, bike racks, a butterfly/pollinator garden, information kiosks, drinking fountains, pet stations, a network of trails, picnic tables, exercise stations, a disk golf course, bird observation area, bench seating, a community garden, lawn playfield, shade structures, bridge crossing, gates, restrooms, and natural drainage swales.
This IS/MND evaluates the proposed project which is being processed through the following development applications:
Plot Plan (PP): Approval of the proposed project plans will become the plot plan; the proposed project will be developed in accordance with Chapter 17.16 of the Wildomar Municipal Code and onsite and offsite improvements consistent with the City’s Parks Master Plan standards.
1.3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1.3.1 Impacts Considered Less Than Significant
The IS/MND identified various thresholds from the California Environmental; Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines in a number of environmental categories that would not be significantly impacted by the proposed project and therefore did not require mitigation. Impacts to the were found to be less than significant:
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Energy
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hydrology and Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population and Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation
Utilities and Service Systems
2198
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099 ) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
1. Introduction
February 2025 Page 3
1.3.2 Potentially Significant Adverse Impacts That Can Be Mitigated, Avoided, or Substantially Lessened
Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Wildfire were identified as having potentially significant impacts that could be reduced, avoided, or substantially lessened through implementation of mitigation measures.
No significant and unavoidable impacts were identified. 2199
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
1. Introduction
This page intentionally left blank.
2200
February 2025 Page 5
2. Mitigation Monitoring Process
2.1 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM ORGANIZATION
Overall MMRP management is the responsibility of the City of Wildomar. The City’s technical consultants (CEQA consultant, etc.) may perform related monitoring tasks under the direction of the environmental monitor if they are contracted by the City.
2.2 CITY OF WILDOMAR
As the lead agency, the City is responsible for the review of all monitoring reports, enforcement actions and document disposition. The City will rely on information provided by individual monitors (e.g., CEQA consultant, etc.) as accurate and up to date, and will field check mitigation measure status, as required.
2.3 MITIGATION MONITORING TEAM
The mitigation monitoring team, consisting of the designated Project Manager (Community Development Director) and Technical Consultants (CEQA consultant, etc.) are responsible for monitoring implementation and compliance with all adopted mitigation measures and conditions of approval. A major portion of the team’s work is in-field monitoring and compliance report preparation. Implementation disputes are brought to the Project Manager, and any appeals would go to the City Manager and ultimately the City Council.
2.3.1 Monitoring Team
The following summarizes key positions in the MMRP and their respective functions:
Project Manager: Responsible for coordination of mitigation monitoring team, technical consultants, report preparation, and overall program administration and document/report clearinghouse. Construction Contractor: Responsible for coordination of mitigation monitoring team; technical consultants; report preparation; and implementation the monitoring program, including overall program administration, document/report clearinghouse, and first phase of dispute resolution. Technical Consultants: Responsible for monitoring in respective areas of expertise (CEQA consultant, project engineer, noise analyst/specialist). Report directly to the Project Manager.
2.3.2 Recognized Experts
The use of recognized experts on the monitoring team is required to ensure compliance with scientific and engineering mitigation measures. The mitigation monitoring team’s recognized experts assess compliance with required mitigation measures, and recognized experts from responsible agencies consult with the Project Manager regarding disputes.
2201
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099 ) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
2. Mitigation Monitoring Process
2.4 DISPUTE RESOLUTION
If the mitigation monitor determines that a mitigation measure, in the opinion of the monitor, has not been implemented or has not been implemented correctly, the problem will be brought before the Project Manager for resolution. The decision of the Project Manager is final unless appealed to the City Manager. The Project Manager will have the authority to issue stop-work order until the dispute is resolved.
2.5 ENFORCEMENT
Public agencies may enforce conditions of approval through their existing police power, using stop-work orders, fines, infraction citations, or in some cases, notice of violation for tax purposes. 2202
February 2025 Page 7
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
3.1 PREMONITORING MEETING
A pre-monitoring meeting will be scheduled to review mitigation measures, implementation requirements, schedule conformance, and mitigation monitoring committee responsibilities. Committee rules are established, the entire mitigation monitoring program is presented, and any misunderstandings are resolved.
3.2 CATEGORIZED MITIGATION MEASURES/MATRIX
Project-specific mitigation measures have been categorized in matrix format, as shown in Table 3-1, Mitigation Monitoring Requirements. The matrix identifies the environmental factor, specific mitigation measures, schedule, and responsible monitor. The mitigation matrix will serve as the basis for scheduling the implementation of, and compliance with, all mitigation measures. These mitigation measures are also contained in the Conditions of Approval matrix for the Project.
3.3 IN-FIELD MONITORING
Project monitors and technical subconsultants shall exercise caution and professional practices at all times when monitoring implementation of mitigation measures. Protective wear (e.g. hard hat, glasses) shall be worn at all times in construction areas. Injuries shall be immediately reported to the mitigation monitoring committee.
3.4 DATABASE MANAGEMENT
All mitigation monitoring reports, letters, and memos shall be prepared utilizing electronic software, such as Microsoft Word, Adobe, etc.
3.5 COORDINATION WITH CONTRACTORS
The construction manager is responsible for coordination of contractors and for contractor completion of required mitigation measures.
3.6 LONG-TERM MONITORING
Long-term monitoring related to several mitigation measures will be required, including review of project plans to ensure compliance with the most recent versions of the California Building Code and California Fire Code.
Post-construction fire inspections are conducted on a routine basis by the City of Wildomar Fire Department. 2203
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
AIR QUALITY
AQ-1 The City’s Public Works Department shall incorporate the following to reduce air pollutant emissions during construction activities:
• Construction activities at the project site shall specify use of off-road equipment that meets the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Tier 4 interim or stricter emissions standards for off-road dieselpowered construction equipment with more than 50 horsepower, unless it can be demonstrated that such equipment is not available. In the event the equipment is not available, as demonstrated by the contractor, Tier 3 equipment retrofitted with a California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Level 3 Verified Diesel Emissions Control Strategy (VDECS) shall be required. • During construction, the construction contractor shall maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the construction site for verification by the City's Building & Safety Department. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, Equipment Identification Numbers, Engine Family Numbers, and number of construction equipment on-site.
These identified measures shall be incorporated into all appropriate construction documents (e.g., construction management plans) submitted to and verified by the City Community Development Department.
Construction
Contractor
During construction
activities
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
BIO-1 Worker’s Environmental Awareness Program and Biological Monitor. Prior to the start of construction, a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) will be developed by the City or the City’s consultant. A qualified biologist with experience with the sensitive biological resources in the region will present the WEAP to all personnel working in the project site (either temporarily or permanently) prior to the start of project activities. The WEAP may be videotaped and used to train newly hired workers or those not present for the initial WEAP. The WEAP will include but will not be limited to discussions of the sensitive biological resources associated with the Project, Project-specific measures to avoid or eliminate impacts to these resources, consequences for not complying with Project permits and agreements, and contact information for the lead biologist. Logs of personnel who have taken the training will be Qualified
Biologist, City of
Wildomar Public
Works
Department
and/or Consultant
Prior to Construction City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
2204
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
February 2025 Page 9
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
kept on the site at the construction or Project office. In addition to a WEAP, a qualified biologist (biological monitor) with experience monitoring for and identifying sensitive biological resources known to occur in the area will be present during initial grounddisturbing activities related to the Project (including fence installation and vegetation removal activities) as well as during ground-disturbing work in and around the natural drainages within the site. As required by Project permits, the qualifications of a biological monitor may need to be submitted to appropriate wildlife agencies for approval based on the resources the biologist will be monitoring. Biological monitoring duties will include, but are not limited to, conducting worker education training, verifying compliance with Project permits, and ensuring Project activities stay within designated work areas. The biological monitor will have the right to halt all activities in an affected area if a special-status species is identified in a work area and is in danger of injury or mortality. If work is halted by the biological monitor, work will proceed only after the hazards to the individual is removed and there is no longer a risk to the individual, or the individual has been moved from harm’s way in accordance with the Project’s permits and/or management/translocation plans. The biological monitor will take representative photographs of the daily activities and will also maintain a daily log that documents general Project activities and compliance with the Project’s permit conditions. Non-compliances will also be documented in the daily log, including any measures that were implemented to rectify the issue.
BIO-2 Tree Preservation and Protection Policy. The Project shall adhere to the criteria and guidelines described within the City of Wildomar’s Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines, Section 7.1.4 in order to ensure the protection, preservation, and maintenance of established and healthy existing and protected trees. Tree protections specifications shall be included on the grading plans which include monitoring by a qualified arborist when working in proximity to protected trees. The qualified arborist shall implement measures to protect the root zone of oak trees and city-protected trees that may be impacted immediately adjacent to the Project impact areas, staging areas, and along ingress/egress roads.
Qualified Arborist Prior to the start of
ground-disturbing
activities
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
BIO-3 Focused Survey and Preconstruction Survey for Burrowing Owls. Protocol-level surveys for burrowing owls shall be required in order to demonstrate consistency with the requirements of the MSHCP. Surveys are required to be performed during the breeding season (March 1 through August 31) as required under Part 2B of the MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions, consisting of four separate surveys conducted throughout the project site, and within a 500-foot buffer surrounding the Qualified Biologist During the breeding
season (March 1
through August 31) and
30 days prior to the
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
2205
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
project site, where accessible, to determine if, when, and how the Survey Area is being used by burrowing owl.
Additionally, a preconstruction survey shall be required within 30 days prior to site disturbance and shall be conducted within the project site and adjacent areas within 30 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities. The surveys shall follow the methods described in the Western Riverside MSHCP Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions. If Burrowing Owls and/or suitable Burrowing Owls burrows with sign (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, prey remains) are identified within the project site during the survey and impacts to those features are unavoidable, consultation with the RCA and CDFW will be required.
start of grounddisturbing activities
BIO-4 Preconstruction Surveys for Crotch Bumble Bee. If the Crotch bumble bee is no longer a Candidate or formally listed species under the California ESA at the time ground-disturbing activities occur, then no additional protection measures are proposed for the species.
If the Crotch bumble bee is legally protected under the California ESA as a Candidate or Listed species at the time ground-disturbing activities are scheduled to begin, preconstruction surveys shall be conducted in accordance with CDFW’s Survey Considerations for California ESA Candidate Bumble Bee Species the season immediately prior to Project-related ground disturbing activities (including but not limited to vegetation clearing, fence installation, and grading). If the species is observed within the proposed project, coordination with CDFW shall be required to develop appropriate avoidance and minimization measures and determine if an Incidental Take Permit would be necessary.
Qualified Biologist Prior to the start of
ground-disturbing
activities
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
BIO-5 Bat Protection – Tree Avoidance and Removal Process. Prior to the trimming or removal of any trees, a focused bat habitat assessment of the trees shall be conducted by a qualified bat biologist. If trees are scheduled to be removed (e.g., relocating)/modified (i.e., trimming) that were determined to be suitable for bat roosting, these activities shall be scheduled during one of the seasonal periods of bat activity, listed below, and when evening temperatures are not below 45oF, and rain is not over 0.5 inch in 24 hours:
September 1 to October 31 (preferred): This is after the maternity season but prior to winter torpor.
Qualified Bat
Biologist
Prior to the trimming or
removal of any trees
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department,
Qualified Bat
Biologist
2206
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
February 2025 Page 11
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
February 15 to March 31: After winter torpor but prior to the start of the maternity season
1. If trees with suitable bat roosting habitat are scheduled for removal or relocation outside of the maternity season, tree removal during the time periods and weather parameters described above using the two-step method shall be conducted:
i. Prior to the two-step method, as much as feasible, vegetation and trees within the area that are not suitable for roosting bats will be removed first to provide a disturbance that might reduce the likelihood of bats using the habitat. ii. Two-step tree removal will occur over two consecutive days under the supervision of a qualified bat biologist. On Day 1, small branches and small limbs containing no cavity, crevice or exfoliating bark habitat on habitat trees (or outer fronds in the case of palm trees), as identified by a qualified bat biologist are removed first, using chainsaws only (i.e., no dozers, backhoes). The following day (Day 2), the remainder of the tree is to be felled/removed. (The intention of this method is to disturb the tree with noise and vibration and branch removal on Day 1. This should cause any potentially present day-roosting bats to abandon the roost tree after they emerge for nighttime foraging. Removing the tree quickly the next consecutive day should avoid reoccupation of the tree by bats).
2. If tree removal/modification must occur during the maternity season (April 1 to August 31), a qualified bat biologist shall conduct a focused emergence survey(s) of the tree(s) within 48 hours of scheduled work. If a maternity roost is located, whether solitary or colonial, that roost will remain undisturbed until after the maternity season or until a qualified biological monitor has determined the roost is no longer active BIO-6 Protection Survey for Nesting Birds. To the greatest extent practicable, grounddisturbing activities, including vegetation removal, shall be conducted outside of the nesting bird season (approximately September 1 through January 14) to avoid direct and indirect impacts to nesting birds. This will avoid violations of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Fish and Game Code Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513. If seasonal avoidance cannot be implemented, it is recommended that ground-disturbing activities, including vegetation removal, be conducted outside of suitable habitat during the breeding season to the greatest extent possible. If Project-related activities cannot avoid the nesting bird season then preconstruction surveys, non-disturbance limit buffers, and biological monitoring during Project activities will be necessary to avoid impacts to nesting birds. A preconstruction survey for nesting birds is Qualified Biologist Prior to the start of
ground-disturbing
activities
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department,
Monitoring Biologist
2207
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
recommended prior to the commencement of ground-disturbing activities within the identified nesting bird season to avoid take of nesting birds. If activities with the potential to disrupt nesting birds are scheduled to occur during the bird breeding season (January 15 through August 31), a preconstruction survey for nesting birds shall be conducted by a qualified biologist who is experienced in the identification of avian species and conducting nesting bird surveys. The nesting survey shall include the project site and adjacent areas where Project activities have the potential to cause nest failure. The preconstruction survey shall be conducted no more than 3 days prior to the start of ground-disturbing activities within the bird breeding season. If no nesting birds are observed during the survey, site preparation and construction activities may begin. If nesting birds (including nesting raptors) are found to be present, avoidance or minimization measures shall be implemented to avoid potential Project-related impacts. Measures may include establishment of an avoidance buffer until nesting has been completed and periodic nest monitoring by the Project biologist until the juveniles have fledged and there has been no evidence of a second attempt at nesting. The width of the avoidance buffer will be determined by the Project biologist. The monitoring biologist will monitor the nest(s) during construction and document any findings. Once nesting is deemed complete by the Project biologist, work may resume within the avoidance buffer area.
BIO-7 Aquatic Resources Delineation. A formal Aquatic Resource Delineation shall be required in order to determine if the drainage features within the project site contain aquatic resources jurisdictional to the USACE, RWQCB, or CDFW, and to determine the acreage of MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources present onsite. Impacts to jurisdictional waters require mitigation through habitat creation, restoration, or enhancement as determined by consultation with the regulatory agencies during the permitting process. Any impacts to CDFW jurisdiction would require a Section 1602 SAA from CDFW. Any impacts to Waters of the U.S. would require a Section 404 permit from the USACE. Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or State would also require a 401 Certification or Waste Discharge Requirements from the San Diego RWQCB.
Qualified Biologist Prior to the start of
ground-disturbing
activities
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
BIO-8 Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation. A Determination of Biologically Equivalent or Superior Preservation shall be prepared, in conjunction with the Aquatic Resource Delineation, to address proposed impacts to MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources located within the project site. Impacts to MSHCP Riparian/Riverine resources will require mitigation to be approved by the Wildlife Agencies.
Qualified Biologist Prior to the start of
ground-disturbing
activities
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
2208
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
February 2025 Page 13
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
CULTURAL RESOURCES
CUL-1 Contractor Awareness Training. Prior to the start of construction activities, the City’s Public Works Department shall ensure that a Contractor Awareness Training Program is delivered to train equipment operators about cultural resources. The program shall be designed to inform construction personnel about federal and state regulations pertaining to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources; the subsurface indicators of resources that shall require a work stoppage; procedures for notifying the City’s Public Works Department of any occurrences; project-specific requirements and mitigation measures; and enforcement of penalties and repercussions for noncompliance with the program. The training shall be prepared by a qualified professional archaeologist and may be provided either through a brochure, video, or in-person tailgate meeting, as determined appropriate by the archaeologist. The training shall be provided to all construction supervisors, forepersons, and operators of ground disturbing equipment. All personnel shall be required to sign a training roster. The construction manager is responsible for ensuring that all required personnel receive the training. The Construction Manager shall provide a copy of the signed training roster to the City’s Public Works Department as proof of compliance.
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Qualified
Professional
Archaeologist
Prior to the start of
construction activities
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
CUL-2 Human Remains. If potential human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the “most likely descendant” (MLD). The MLD shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. No photographs are to be taken of any human remains and/or cremations except by the coroner, with written approval by the consulting tribe(s).
Qualified
Professional
Archaeologist
During any grounddisturbing construction
activities
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
GEO-1 The City’s Public Works Department shall incorporate the recommendations from the Geotechnical Evaluation Report prepared by GeoTek, Inc. (Appendix 5) and the Final Soils Report prepared by Waypoint Analytical (Appendix 6), or as directed by the City City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
During building plan
check, prior to any
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
2209
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
Engineer, for the proposed project into project plans. The project’s building plans shall demonstrate that they incorporate all applicable recommendations of the Geotechnical Evaluation Report and the Final Soils Report, and comply with all applicable requirements of the latest adopted version of the California Building Code.
Licensed
Professional
Engineer
ground-disturbing
construction activities
Department, Public
Works Department
GEO-2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall retain a Certified Paleontologist to assess the potential for presence of paleontological resources and the potential for project construction to affect such resources if present. If it is determined, to the satisfaction of the City, that there is low potential for discovery or disturbance of paleontological resources, no further action shall be required.
If potential for discovery is deemed moderate to high, the project applicant shall retain a Certified Paleontologist to monitor all initial ground-disturbing activities in native soils or sediments. If the paleontologist, upon observing initial earthwork, determines there is low potential for discovery, no further action shall be required, and the paleontologist shall submit a memo to the City confirming findings of low potential.
Should any paleontological resources (i.e., fossils) be uncovered during project construction activities, all work within a 100-foot radius of the discovery site shall be halted or diverted to other areas on the site and the City shall be immediately notified.
A Certified Paleontologist shall evaluate the finds and recommend appropriate next steps to ensure that the resource is not substantially adversely impacted, including but not limited to avoidance, preservation in place, excavation, documentation, curation, data recovery, or other appropriate measures.
Further ground disturbance shall not resume within a 100-foot radius of the discovery site until an agreement has been reached between the project applicant, a Certified Paleontologist, and the City as to the appropriate preservation or mitigation measures to ensure that the resource is not substantially adversely impacted.
Salvage and collection of significant fossils shall be done in accordance with the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines. Any paleontological resources salvaged shall be provided for curation at a local curation facility, or any other local museum or repository, such as the Western Science Center or World Museum of Natural History, willing and able to accept and house the resource to preserve for future scientific study.
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
Certified
Paleontologist
During GroundDisturbing
Construction Activities
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department, Public
Works Department
2210
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
February 2025 Page 15
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
HAZ-1 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City’s Public Works Department shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Building Official and the Riverside County Fire Chief, compliance with the 2022 California Building Code (or the most recent edition) (Part 2 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations) and the 2022 California Fire Code (or the most recent edition) (Part 9 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), including those regulations pertaining to materials and construction methods intended to mitigate wildfire exposure as described in the 2022 California Building Code and California Residential Code (or most recent edition); specifically California Building Code Chapter 7A; California Residential Code Section R327; California Residential Code Section R337; California Referenced Standards Code Chapter 12 7A; and California Fire Code Chapter 49.
City Building
Official and
Riverside County
Fire Department
Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
City of Wildomar
Building Department
and Riverside
County Fire
Department
HAZ-2 Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the City’s Public Works Department shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City Building Official and the County Fire Chief, compliance with the vegetation management requirements prescribed in California Fire Code Section 4906 and California Government Code Section 51182.
City Building
Official and
Riverside County
Fire Department
Prior to Issuance of a
Certificate of
Occupancy
City of Wildomar
Building Department
and Riverside
County Fire
Department
TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
TRI-1 Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Cultural resources are defined, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but also include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the lead agency and Native American Tribe(s) that elected to consult under AB 52 (“Consulting Tribe(s)”). a. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find.
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
Professional
Archaeologist
During Any GroundDisturbing or
Construction Activities
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
2211
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
b. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal
representative(s), developer, and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community
Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation
(documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources.
c. Grading or further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed.
d. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Treatment and Monitoring
Agreements entered into with the Consulting Tribe(s) and the applicant. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Mitigation Measures TRI-2 and TRI-7. e. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan (see Mitigation Measure TRI-6) shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan.
f. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. If the landowner and the Consulting Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the 2212
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
February 2025 Page 17
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
mitigation for the archaeological or tribal cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the Community Development Director for decision. The City’s Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological and tribal cultural resources, recommendations of the project archeologist, and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Consulting Tribe(s). Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.
TRI-2 Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference as numbered, shall be employed with the Consulting Tribe(s). Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Wildomar Community Development Department:
i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if
feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the
resources, leaving them in the place where they were
found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources.
ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the
following: Measures and provisions to protect the
future reburial area from any future impacts in
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
Professional
Archaeologist
During Grading
Activities
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
2213
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally
required cataloging and basic recordation have been
completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial
goods and Native American human remains are
excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally
appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the
reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report (see Mitigation Measure TRI-6). The Phase IV
Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request.
iii. If preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally
appropriate manner at a Riverside County curation
facility that meets State Resources Department Office
of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and use
pursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and
associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees by
the Applicant necessary for permanent curation.
Evidence of curation in the form of a letter from the
curation facility stating that subject archaeological
materials have been received and that all fees have
been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the
City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods, and Native American
human remains, as defined by the cultural and religious practices of the Most Likely Descendant. Results
2214
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
February 2025 Page 19
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report.
TRI-3 Archaeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the project applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA), to monitor all ground disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources.
The Registered Professional Archaeologist and the Tribal monitor(s) required by Mitigation Measures TRI-4 and TRI-5 shall manage and oversee monitoring for all initial ground disturbing activities and excavation of each portion of the project site including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, mass or rough grading, trenching, stockpiling of materials, rock crushing, structure demolition and etc. The Registered Professional Archaeologist and the Tribal monitor(s), shall independently have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources in coordination with any required special interest or tribal monitors.
The developer/permit holder shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract to the Community Development Department to ensure compliance with this condition of approval. Upon verification, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition.
In addition, the Registered Professional Archaeologist, in consultation with the Consulting Tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in AB 52 to address the details, timing and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the Project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Cal Pub Res Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a. Project grading and development scheduling;
Qualified
Archaeologist,
Tribal Cultural
Monitor(s), and
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department
Prior to Issuance of
Grading Permit
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
2215
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
b. The Project archaeologist and the Consulting Tribes(s) shall attend the pre-grading meeting with the City, the construction manager and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The Training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the Project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until the find(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin work on the Project following the initial Training must take the Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work and the Project archaeologist and Consulting Tribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an asneeded basis; c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, Consulting Tribe(s) and Project archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.
TRI-4 Native American Monitoring (Pechanga). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the above-mentioned Tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
Tribal Cultural
Monitor(s)
During GroundDisturbing ActivitiesCity of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
2216
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
February 2025 Page 21
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
TRI-5 Native American Monitoring (Soboba). Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the above-mentioned Tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Community Development Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
Tribal Cultural
Monitor(s)
During GroundDisturbing ActivitiesCity of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
TRI-6 Archeology Report – Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two (2) copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the Project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Community Development Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the Eastern Information Center (EIC) at the University of California Riverside (UCR) and one (1) copy shall be submitted to the Consulting Tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
Qualified
Archaeologist
Prior to Final
Inspection
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
2217
20 - ACRE PASSIVE PARK (CIP 099) MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
3. Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Table 3-1 Mitigation Monitoring Requirements
Mitigation Measure
Responsibility for
Implementation Timing
Responsibility for
Monitoring
Monitor
(Signature Required)
(Date of Compliance)
TRI-7 Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and Lead Agencies, will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department and
Professional
Archaeologist
During Discovery of
Native American
Human Remains
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
TRI-8 No-Build Easement or Similar Instrument. In the event that Native American artifacts are found and buried within the project vicinity, a no-build easement, or similar legal instrument, shall be used to preclude future development from taking place on the reburial site(s).
City of Wildomar
Community
Development
Department
Before Reburial of
Native American
Artifacts
City of Wildomar
Public Works
Department,
Community
Development
Department
WILDFIRE
See Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2.
2218
February 2025 Page 23
4. Mitigation Monitoring Reports
Mitigation monitoring reports are required to document compliance with the Mitigation Monitoring Program and to resolve disputes. Specific reports include:
Field Check Report
Implementation Compliance Report
Dispute/Enforcement Report
4.1 FIELD CHECK REPORT
Field check reports are required to record in-field compliance and conditions.
4.2 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLIANCE REPORT
The Implementation Compliance Report (ICR) is prepared to document the implementation of mitigation measures on a phased basis, based on the information in Table 3-1. The report summarizes implementation compliance, including mitigation measures, date completed, and monitor’s signature.
4.3 DISPUTE/ENFORCEMENT REPORT
The Dispute/Enforcement Report (DER) is prepared to document the outcome of the Project Manager or City Manager and becomes a portion of the ICR.
2219
CHIQUITO BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE FACILITY PROJECT (PA NO. 22 - 0026) MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
4. Mitigation Monitoring Reports
This page intentionally left blank.
2220
February 2025 Page 25
5. Community Involvement
Monitoring reports are public documents and are available for review by the general public. Discrepancies in monitoring reports can be taken to the Project Manager or Community Development Director by the general public.
2221
CHIQUITO BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE FACILITY PROJECT (PA NO. 22 - 0026) MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
5. Community Involvement
This page intentionally left blank.
2222
February 2025 Page 27
6. Report Preparation
6.1 LIST OF PREPARERS
City of Wildomar
Matthew C. Bassi, Community Development Director
PlaceWorks
Mark Teague, AICP, Managing Principal
Jasmine Osman, Senior Associate
Joseph Ruiz, Planner
2223
CHIQUITO BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE FACILITY PROJECT (PA NO. 22 - 0026) MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM
CITY OF WILDOMAR
6. Report Preparation
This page intentionally left blank
2224
2225
4904-6613-7669 v2 1
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City of Wildomar
Attention: City Clerk
23873 Clinton Keith Road
Suite 110
Wildomar, CA 92595
EXEMPT FROM RECORDING FEES,
BUILDING HOMES & JOBS TRUST FUND
FEE & DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX:
Gov. Code § 27383, § 27388.1(a)(2)(D),
Rev & Tax Code § 11922
THE UNDERSIGNED LICENSOR DECLARES:
This transaction is exempt from documentary transfer tax pursuant to Revenue & Taxation Code Section §11922.
City of Wildomar, an exempt agency, is acquiring title.
Exempt from the Building Homes and Jobs Act Fee per
Government Code §27388.1(a)(2)(D). This document
is being recorded by a municipality.
_____________________
Signature of Declarant
SECOND AMENDMENT TO WATER LICENSE AGREEMENT
For valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of which is acknowledged, this Second Amendment to Water License Agreement (the "Second Amendment") is made and entered into by and between CAFH ORDER AT WILDOMAR, INC., a California religious nonprofit corporation ("Licensor"), and the CITY OF WILDOMAR, a California municipal corporation ("Licensee") dated June 11, 2025 for reference, with reference to the following recitals of fact. Licensee and Licensor may each hereinafter be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”
A. By that certain Grant Deed dated June 29, 2023, Licensor conveyed to Licensee those certain parcels of real property as more particularly described in: (i) Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B; and (ii) Exhibit C attached hereto (collectively, the “Licensee Property”).
B. Licensor is the owner of that certain parcel of real property as described in Exhibit D-1 and depicted in Exhibit D-2 attached hereto (the “Licensor Property”).
C. The Parties entered into a Water License Agreement, recorded on June 29, 2023 as Instrument Number 2023-0188252 (the “Original License”) to allow Licensee to temporarily 2226
4904-6613-7669 v2 2
use a water line and related utility facilities located on the Licensor Property to irrigate the Licensee Property.
D. The Parties subsequently entered into a First Amendment, recorded on May 14, 2024 as Instrument Number 2024-0139512 (“First Amendment”) to extend the term of the Original License. The Original License, as amended by the First Amendment, is hereinafter referred to as the “Agreement.”
E. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement a second time to grant Licensee additional time to use the water line and related utility facilities while Licensee continues to work to obtain all necessary approvals for and install its own water line and related utility facilities to irrigate the Licensee Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, Licensor and Licensee agree as follows:
1. Term. The Term of the Water License is hereby extended and shall terminate on the earlier of (a) June 30, 2026 or (b) thirty (30) days from the date that Licensee provides Licensor written notice that Licensee has installed a fully functional water line or water lines and related appurtenances thereto outside of the Licensor Property to supply water to the Licensee Property.
2. Water Costs; Water Usage. To compensate Licensor for Licensee’s anticipated water usage during the Term Licensee shall pay Licensor the sum of Three Hundred Thirty-Three Dollars and Thirty Three Cents ($333.33) per month. The last monthly payment shall be due on the earlier to occur of June 1, 2026, or thirty (30) days from the date of Licensee’s written notice described in Section 1 above.
3. Full Force and Effect. Except as modified by this Second Amendment, the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Second Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this Second Amendment shall prevail.
4. Entire Agreement. The Agreement, together with this Second Amendment, embodies the entire understanding between Licensor and Licensee with respect to its subject matter and can be changed only by an instrument in writing signed by Licensor and Licensee.
5. Counterparts. The Parties hereto agree that this Second Amendment may be executed and acknowledged in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, and said counterparts shall together constitute one and the same agreement, binding all of the Parties hereto, notwithstanding all of the Parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterparts.
6. Authorized Signatories. The signatories to this Second Amendment hereby warrant and represent that they have the authority, on behalf of their respective principals, to execute this Second Amendment.
[Signature Page Follows]
2227
4904-6613-7669 v2 3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year first-above written.
LICENSOR
CAFH ORDER AT WILDOMAR, INC.,
a California corporation
By: _______________________
Print Name: _________________
Its: ________________________
By: _______________________
Print Name:__________________
Its: ________________________
LICENSEE
CITY OF WILDOMAR,
a California municipal corporation
By: _____________________________
Chris Mann, Interim City Manager
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Thomas D. Jex, City Attorney
[Signed in Counterpart]
2228
4904-6613-7669 v2 Acknowledgment
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: (seal)
2229
4880-2190-2777 v3 Exhibit A
EXHIBIT A
Description of Licensee Property
[Attached]
2230
2231
4880-2190-2777 v3 Exhibit B
EXHIBIT B
Depiction of Licensee Property
[Attached]
2232
2233
4880-2190-2777 v3 Exhibit C
EXHIBIT C
Description of Licensee Property (APN 380-050-025)
Real property in the City of Wildomar, County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows:
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 37717, IN THE CITY OF WILDOMAR, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 248, PAGES 88 AND 89 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL RIGHTS TO WATER, INCLUDING SURFACE AND
GROUNDWATER RIGHTS OVER, UPON AND UNDER PROPERTY AND WHICH ARE
APPURTENANT THERETO OR ARE OTHERWISE ASSOCIATED WITH PROPERTY, AS
CONVEYED TO ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT BY THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED JUNE 9, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2020-0244703 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
Assessor Parcel Number 380-050-025
2234
4880-2190-2777 v3 Exhibit D-1
EXHIBIT D-1
Legal Description of Licensor Property
[Attached ]
2235
2236
4880-2190-2777 v3 Exhibit D-2
EXHIBIT D-2
Map of Licensor Property
[Attached]
2237
2238
4904-6613-7669 v2 Acknowledgment
CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE
This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the Second Amendment to Water License Agreement dated _____________, 2025 from CAFH ORDER AT WILDOMAR, INC., a California religious nonprofit corporation to CITY OF WILDOMAR, a California municipal corporation, is hereby accepted by the undersigned officer or agent on behalf of City Council pursuant to authority conferred by resolution of the City Council adopted on _____________, 2025 and the grantee consents to recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer.
Dated ____________________
By________________________
Chris Mann, Interim City Manager
2239
4904-6613-7669 v2 Acknowledgment
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
On ____________________, before me, ____________________________, Notary Public, personally appeared _______________________________, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature: (seal)
2240
CITY OF WILDOMAR
MEETING (CCR)
FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Meeting Date: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Future Agenda Items
SUBMITTED BY: Janet Morales
ACTION:
Title- Councilmember-Anticipated Date
1. Expand Pavement Management/Road Rehab Program for private and public roads - Marquez - TBD
2. Discuss restricting certain future uses on major corridors - Marquez - TBD
3. Street Lighting Options for neighborhoods that don't currently have lighting - Marquez - TBD
4. Discuss potential Public Safety Subcommittee - DePhillippo - TBD
5. Park Rental Policy - Morabito - TBD
6. Shed Setback from property line - DePhillippo - TBD
7. Solar/Battery back up for City Hall - DePhillippo - TBD
8. Collaboration with Native Plant Network - Marquez - TBD
9. Review Pay Plan adopted December 2024 - Morabito - TBD 2241
CITY OF WILDOMAR
MEETING (CCR)
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 1.2
Meeting Date: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: Minutes - May 14, 2025 - Regular Meeting
SUBMITTED BY: Janet Morales, City Clerk
ACTION:
Approve the minutes as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 05-14-2025 Minutes
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
CITY OF WILDOMAR
MEETING (CCR)
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 4.2
Meeting Date: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: May 2025 Cemetery Warrant Register
SUBMITTED BY: Nicholas Neidiffer, Accountant I
PREPARED BY: Nicholas Neidiffer, Accountant I
ACTION:
Approve the following:
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025
1. Warrant Register dated 5-1-2025 in the amount of $742.32.
2. Warrant Register dated 5-8-2025 in the amount of $1,387.91.
3. Warrant Register dated 5-15-2025 in the amount of $10,816.56.
4. Warrant Register dated 5-22-2025 in the amount of $41,781.57.
5. Warrant Register dated 5-29-2025 in the amount of $4,496.22.
SUMMARY:
May 2025 Cemetery Warrant Register
DISCUSSION:
The Wildomar Cemetery District requires that the Trustees audit payments of demands and direct the General Manager to issue checks. The Warrant Registers are submitted for approval.
ACCOUNT CODE:
300
302
FISCAL IMPACT:
These Warrant Registers will have a budgetary impact in the amount and fiscal year noted in the recommendation section of this report. These costs are included in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budgets.
ATTACHMENTS:
May 2025 Cemetery Warrant Register.pdf
2254
Transaction Name Bill Date
Payment
Date Fund Line Amount (Debit)
Amount
(Credit) Vendor Memo
Bill #4228476706 4/24/2025 5/1/2025 300 - Cemetery 30.18 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4228476706 4/24/2025 5/1/2025 300 - Cemetery 31.88 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4228476706 4/24/2025 5/1/2025 300 - Cemetery 28.47 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4228476706 4/24/2025 5/1/2025 300 - Cemetery 5.34 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #5266345004 4/24/2025 5/1/2025 300 - Cemetery 194.27 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Cemetery First Aid & Safety Bill #419691 4/9/2025 5/1/2025 300 - Cemetery 452.18 0.00 RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, INC. (2) Cemetery Restroom Maintenance/Service
04/07/25-05/04/25
Bill #1JMR-P61H-LXR4 2/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 83.73 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment, Maintenance/Repair Bill #1JMR-P61H-LXR4 2/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 152.85 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Office Supplies Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 13.04 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 48.39 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 16.30 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 34.79 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 23.35 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 22.61 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 78.00 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 108.90 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 10.85 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 25.99 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #1Y1RR-J3RL-WVJQ 4/1/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 12.41 0.00 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Cemetery - Equipment Maintenance/Repair Bill #042825-7258 4/28/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 166.69 0.00 EDISON 03/27/25-04/27/25 Elec - 21400 Palomar
(Cemetery)
Bill #611144558 4/22/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 14.97 0.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/23/25-05/22/25 Cemetery /Comm Svs Bill #611144558 4/22/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 52.18 0.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/23/25-05/22/25 Cemetery 2255
Bill #611144558 4/22/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 95.26 0.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/23/25-05/22/25 Cemetery Bill #611144558 4/22/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 52.18 0.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/23/25-05/22/25 Cemetery Bill #611144558 4/22/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 112.35 0.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 04/25/25-05/22/25 Cemetery Equipment Bill #8010599156 4/25/2025 5/8/2025 300 - Cemetery 263.07 0.00 STERICYCLE, INC Contractual Shredding Svc Bill #191432588 4/9/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 63.32 0.00 ULINE Cemetery - Office Supplies Bill #4229224780 5/1/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 30.52 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4229224780 5/1/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 32.22 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4229224780 5/1/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 28.81 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4229224780 5/1/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 5.33 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #15D8710073513 4/24/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 60.94 0.00 PRIMO BRANDS Water Bottle Services 03/21/25-04/20/25 Bill #9193v2 5/13/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 10,500.00 0.00
STEVE'S AIR CONDITIONING AND
HEATING CORP. Cemetery HVAC Replacement
Bill #399243 5/6/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 48.94 0.00 STAUFFERS LAWN EQUIPMENT Departmental Supplies Bill #308889/3 5/9/2025 5/15/2025 300 - Cemetery 46.48 0.00 ACE HARDWARE Lock Key Storage Bill #422933033 5/14/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 30.52 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #422933033 5/14/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 32.22 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #422933033 5/14/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 28.81 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #422933033 5/14/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 5.33 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #51525 5/15/2025 5/22/2025
302 - Cemetery
Capital
Improvement
Fund 40,010.00 0.00 VAN ENGINEERING
CIP 028-2 Palomar Widening and CIP 067
Cemetery Frontage - Construction
Bill #422640 5/7/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 452.18 0.00 RIGHTWAY SITE SERVICES, INC. (2) Cemetery Restroom Maintenance/Service
5/05/25-6/01/25
Bill #13580776 4/29/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 525.57 0.00
ELSINORE VALLEY MUNICIPAL,
WATER DISTRICT 3/17/25-04/17/25 Cemetery Water Services Bill #9319229146 4/30/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 150.08 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION SD Eyewash Service Agreement 2256
Bill #1503 5/16/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 450.00 0.00 HONOR PLUMBING CO Misc. Repairs Bill #4230682507 5/15/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 30.51 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4230682507 5/15/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 32.21 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4230682507 5/15/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 28.81 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #4230682507 5/15/2025 5/22/2025 300 - Cemetery 5.33 0.00 CINTAS CORPORATION Staff Uniform & Towel Maintenance Bill #1418379 2/28/2025 5/29/2025
302 - Cemetery
Capital
Improvement
Fund 4,496.22 0.00
INTERWEST CONSULTING
GROUP
CIP 067 Palomar Widening Phase 2 - February
2025
TOTAL: 59,224.58
2257
CITY OF WILDOMAR
MEETING (CCR)
CONSENT CALENDAR
Agenda Staff Report # 4.3
Meeting Date: June 11, 2025
SUBJECT: April 2025 Cemetery Treasurer's Report
SUBMITTED BY: Adam Jantz, Finance Manager
PREPARED BY: Adam Jantz, Finance Manager
ACTION:
Approve the Treasurer’s Report for April 2025.
SUMMARY:
April 2025 Cemetery Treasurer's Report
DISCUSSION:
Attached is the Treasurer’s Report for Cash and Investments for the month of April 2025.
ACCOUNT CODE:
300-1011
301-1011
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is only a report of balances for the Cemetery and therefore has no fiscal impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
April 2025 Cemetery Treasurer's Report.pdf
2258
PERCENT
OF DAYS STATED
FUND BOOK VALUE FACE VALUE MARKET VALUE PORTFOLIO TO MAT. RATE 301 $ 443,392.28 $ 443,392.28 $ 443,392.28 28.48% N/A 4.450% 300 $ 1,077,310.70 $ 1,077,310.70 $ 1,113,589.21 71.52% 932 4.390% $ 1,520,702.98 $ 1,520,702.98 $ 1,556,981.49 100.00%
+ + WITHDRAWALS/
BEGINNING DEPOSITS/ INTEREST SALES/ ENDING STATED
FUND BALANCE PURCHASES DEPOSITED MATURITIES BALANCE RATE 301 $ 441,776.72 $ - $ 1,615.56 $ - $ 443,392.28 4.450% 300 $ 1,073,421.05 $ - $ 3,889.65 $ - $ 1,077,310.70 4.390% TOTAL $ 1,515,197.77 $ - $ 5,505.21 $ - $ 1,520,702.98
WILDOMAR CEMETERY DISTRICT
TREASURER'S REPORT FOR
CASH AND INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
April 2025
DISTRICT INVESTMENT
ISSUER
ISSUER
TOTAL
CAMP POOL
CAMP MANAGED ACCOUNT
CAMP POOL
CAMP MANAGED ACCOUNT
City Treasurer
In compliance with the California Code Section 53646, as City Treasurer for the Wildomar Cemetery District, I hereby certify that sufficient investment liquidity and anticipated revenues are available to meet the District's expenditure requirements for the next six months.
I also certify that this report reflects all Government Agency pooled investments and all of the District's Bank Balances.
Heidi Schrader 5/19/2025
Heidi Schrader Date
2259