Agenda packet — Folsom City Council, June 14, 2022 (part 3 of 5)

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satislled
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPiF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transporlation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Tnffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Before prqect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Direct Merge (Freeway Merge 6), To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road onramp direct merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road direct merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U.S.50 Eastbound/Prairie City Road Flyover On-Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off-Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 8). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave, an improvement acceptable to Caltrans should be implemented to eliminate the unacceptable weaving conditions. Such an improvement may involve a "braided ramp".

The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road flyover on-ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway off-ramp weave (Freeway Weave 8), Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Eastbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Merge (F'reeway Merge 9). To ensure that Eastbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge, an auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound/ Oak Avenue Parkway loop merge (Freeway Merge 9). 3A.15-ly
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-lz
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-laa
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-70
106
-71
t06
-72
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 12 of 140

Page 237 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traflic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
shduld be built.

Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 23). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determrned by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 23).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S, 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 29). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the Prairie City Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Oak Avenue Parkway would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Calhans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Oak Avenue Parkway loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge 29). 3A.15-ldd
(FPASP
EIR/f,IS)

34. I 5-l ee
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
r06
-73
106
-74
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 113 ends

Page 238 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condrtron
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specitic Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportatron
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before prolect
build out A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32), To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road loop ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 32).

Participate in Fair Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 33). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Prairie City Road direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Folsom Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S, 50 Westbound/Prairie City Road direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 33).

Participate in tr'air Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S, 50 Eastbound/Folsom Boulevard Diverge (Freeway Diverge 34). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Folsom Boulevard Diverge, an auxiliary lane from the Prarrie City Road loop ramp merge must be constructed. improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Conidor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropnate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Folsom Boulevard diverge (Freeway Divetge 34).
3A.t5-1ff
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.1s-lgg
(FPASP
ErR/f,IS)
3A.15-1hh
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-/3
106
-76
106
-77
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 14 of 140

Page 239 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation
and City of
Rancho
Cordova
Department of
Public Works
City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before prolect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before approval
of improvement
plans for all
project phases
any particular
discretionary
development
application that
includes
residential and
commercial or
mixed-use
development.

As a condition
of project
aooroval and/or
Participate in Fair Sbare Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S. 50 Westbound/flazel Avenue Direct Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 38). To ensure that Westbound U.S. 50 operates at an acceptable LOS at the Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge, an auxiliary lane to the Sunrise Boulevard off ramp diverge must be constructed. This auxiliary lane improvement is included in the proposed 50 Corridor Mobility Fee Program. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound/Hazel Avenue direct ramp merge (Freeway Merge 38).

Develop Commercial Support Services and Mixed-use Development Concurrent with Housing Development, and Develop and Provide Options for Alternative Transportation Modes. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application including commercial or mixed-use development along with residential uses shall develop commercial and mixed-use development concurrent with housing development, to the extent feasible in light of market realities and other considerations, to internalize vehicle trips.

Pedestrian and bicycle facilities shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department. To further minimize impacts from the increased demand on area roadways and intersections, the project applicant($ for any particular discretionary development application involving schools or commercial centers shall develop and implement safe and secure bicycle parking to promote alternative transportation uses and reduce the volume of single-occupancy vehicles using area roadways and intersections. The project applicant(s) for any particular discretronary development application shall participate in capital improvements and operating funds for transit service to increase the percent oftravel by transit. The project's fair-share participation and the associated timing ofthe improvements and service shall be identified in the project conditions ofapproval and/or the project's development agreement. Improvements and service shall be coordinated, as necessary, with Folsom Stage Lines and Sacramento RT. 3A.15-1ii
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-2a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
-78
106
-79
Resolution No. 10670
Page ll5ofl40

Page 240 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satistied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specitic Plan Intiastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transnortation fees collected orior to
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
as a condrtion
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

Concurrent wrth
construction for
all project
phases.

Concurrent with
construction for
all project
phases.

As a condition
of prqect
approval and/or
as a condition
of the
development
agreement for
all project
phases.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
orior to
Participate in the City's Transportation System Management Fee Program, The project applican(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall pay an appropriate amount into the.City's existing Transportation System Management Fee Program to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Participate with the 50 Corridor Transportation Management Association, The project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall join and participate with the 50 Comdor Transportation Management Association to reduce the number of single-occupant automobile travel on area roadways and intersections.

Pay Full Cost of ldentified Improvements that Are Not Funded by the City's Fee Program, In accordance with Measure W, the project applicant(s) for any particular discrehonary development application shall provide fair-share contributions to the City's transportation impact fee program to fully fund improvements only required because of the Specific Plan.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Sibley Street/Blue Ravine Road Intersection (Folsom Intenection 2). To ensure that the Sibley Streettslue Ravine Road intersection operates at a LOS D with less than the Cumulative No Project delay, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-tum lane, two through lanes, and one dedicated right-tum lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study

34.15-2b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-2c
(FPASP
f,rR/f,rs)
3A.15-3
(FPASP
EIR/ErS)
3A.15-4a
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-80
106
-81
106
-82
r06
-83
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 16 of 140

Page 241 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the tbllowing improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastruchre
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
or other appropriate and reliable mechamsm paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Sibley Streeltslue Ravine Road intersection (Folsom Intersection 2).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 6). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/East Bidwell Street intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane, and the westbound (East Bidwell Street) approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left tum lanes, four through lanes, and a right-turn lane. It is against the City ol Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because of the impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell Street/College Street Intersection (Folsom Intersection 7), To ensure that the East Bidwell StreeVCollege Street intersection operates at acceptable LOS C or better, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, one letl-through lane, and two dedicated right-turn lanes. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the East Bidwell StreetNesmith Court intersection (Folsom Intersection 7). 3A.15-4b
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4c
(FPASP
EIRiEIS)
106
-84
106
-8s
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 17 of 140

Page 242 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condrtton
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision,
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento Countv Wide
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out, A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to F'und the Construction of Improvements to the East Bidwell Street/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 2l). To ensure that the East Bidwell Street /lron Point Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, four through lanes and a right-turn lane, and the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-tum lanes, four tlrough lanes and a right-turn lane, It is against the City of Folsom policy to have eight lane roads because ofthe impacts to non motorized traffic and adjacent development; therefore, this improvement is infeasible.

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Serpa Way/ Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23). To imptove LOS at the Serpa Way/ kon Point Road intersection, the northbound approaches must be restriped to consist of one left-turn lane, one shared Ieft-through lanes, and one right-turn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Serpa Way/lron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 23).

The Applicant Shall Pay a Fair Share to Fund the Construction of Improvements to the Empire Ranch Road/Iron Point Road Intersection (Folsom Intersection 24). To ensure that the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road intersection operates at a LOS D or better, all ofthe following improvements are required:

The eastbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of one left-turn lane, hvo through lanes, and a righl turn lane. The westbound aooroach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes. one through lane, 3A.15-4d
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4e
(FPASP
EIR/f,rS)
3A.1s-4f
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
-86
106
-87
106
-88
Resolution No. 10670

Page 1 ends

Page 243 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
a butldtng
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condrtion
will be
satistied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit Issuance in this
subdivision.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Betbre project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
prqect phase
the
and a tlrough+ight lane. The northbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, three through lanes, and a right-turn lane. The southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist oftwo left-turn lanes, ttree tfuough lanes, and a right-hrn lane. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the Empire Ranch Road / Iron Point Road Intersection Before project build out. A phasing analysis should be performed prior to approval of the first subdivision map to determine during which project phase the improvement should be built. (Folsom Intersection 24).

The Applicant Shall Fund and Construct Improvements to the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway Intersection (Folsom Intersection 33). To ensure that the Oak Avenue Parkway/Easton Valley Parkway intersection operates at an acceptable LOS the southbound approach must be reconfigured to consist of two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and two right-turn lanes, The applicant shall fund and construct these improvements.

Participate in Fair Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Grant Line RoadAVhite Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3). To ensure that the Grant Line Road,Mhite Rock Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS E or better this intersection should be replaced by some type ofgrade separated intersection or interchange. Improvements to this intersection are identified in the Sacramento County's Proposed General Plan. Implementation ofthese improvements would assist in reducing traffic impacts on this intersection by providing acceptable operation. Intersection improvements must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Grant Line Road/White Rock Road Intersection (Sacramento County Intersection 3)
3A.15-4g
(FPASP
ErwErs)

34.15-4i
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
t06
-89
106
-90
Resolution No. 10670
Pagell9ofl40

Page 244 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportatron.
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Betbre prqect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). To rmprove operation on Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard, this roadway segm€nt must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between White Rock Road and Kiefer Boulevard (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 5-7). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U. S. 50 project on this roadway segment.

Participate in Fair Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). To improve operation on Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard Jackson Highway, this roadway segment could be widened to six lanes. This improvement is proposed in the Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova General Plans; however, it is not in the 2035 MTP. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County and the City of Rancho Cordova The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Grant Line Road between Kiefer Boulevard and Jackson Highway (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 8). The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment, Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U,S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

To improve operation on Hazel Avenue between Cunagh Downs Drive and the U.S. 50 westbound ramps, this roadway segment could be widened to eight lanes. This improvement is inconsistent with Sacramento Countv's general olan because the countv's policv requires a maximum roadway cross section of six lanes. 3A.rs-4j
oPASP
ErR/[rs)
3A.15-4k
(FPASP
f,rwErs)
3A.15-4t
(FPASP
f,IR/XIS)
t06
-91
106
-92
106
-93
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 120 of 140 ends

Page 245 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfred
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satistied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffrc Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior lo
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Inliastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Betbre project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
Analysis shown later indicates that improvements at the impacted intersection in this segment can be mitigated (see Mitigation Measure 3A. l54q). Improvements to impacted intersections on this segment will improve operations on this roadway segment and, therefore; mitigate this segment impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Hazel Avenue between Curragh Downs Drive and U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps (Sacramento County Roadway Segments 12-13).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22). To improve operation on White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. This improvement is included in the 2035 MTP but is not included in the Sacramento County General Plan, Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The identified improvement would more than offset the impacts specifically related to the Folsom South of U.S. 50 project on this roadway segment. However, because of other development in the region that would substantially increase traffic levels, this roadway segment would continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS F even with the capacity improvements idenfified to mitigate Folsom South ofU S, 50 impacts. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Grant Line Road and Prairie City Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 22).

Participate in Fair Share F'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28), To improve operation on White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road, this roadway segment must be widened to six lanes. Improvements to this roadway segment must be implemented by Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to White Rock Road between Empire Ranch Road and Carson Crossing Road (Sacramento County Roadway Segment 28).
3A.154m
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
3A.15-4n
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
106
-94
106
-95
Resolution No. 10670

Page 121 of 140 ends

Page 246 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivisron will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation,
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Betbre pro.yect
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (EI Dorado County l). To ensure that the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the eastbound right turn lane must be converted into a separate free right turn lane, or double right. Improvements to this intersection must be implemented by El Dorado County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of t'unding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the White Rock Road/Carson Crossing Road Intersection (El Dorado County I ).

Participate in Fair Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1), To ensure that the Hazel Avenue/U.S. 50 westbound ramps intersection operates at an acceptable LOS, the westbound approach must be reconfigured to consist ofone dedicated left turn lane, one shared left through lane and three dedicated right-turn lanes. improvements to this intersection must be implemented by Caltrans and Sacramento County. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to the Hazel AvenueIJ.S. 50 Westbound Ramps Intersection (Caltrans Intersection 1).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment 1). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Conidor Svstem Manasement Plant therefore. it is not likelv to be implemented bv Caltrans bv 2030. 3A.15-4o
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4p
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4q
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
-96
106
-97
r06
-98
Resolution No. 10670

Page 122 of 140 ends

Page 247 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision,
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Intiastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Betbre project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
tirst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built
Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic from U.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share offunding ofimprovements to the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Zinfandel Drive and Sunrise Boulevard (Freeway Segment l).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of lnprovements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue, an additional eastbound lane could be constructed. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Corridor System Management Plan, therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic offofU.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of lunding of improvements t0 the agency responsible for improvements, based on a program established by that agency to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Rancho Cordova Parkway and Hazel Avenue (Freeway Segment 3).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (f,'reeway Segment 5), To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road, the eastbound auxiliary lane should be converted to a mixed flow lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A.l5-4t). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. This improvement is not consistent with the Concept Facility in Caltrans State Route 50 Conidor System Management Plan; therefore, it is not likely to be implemented by Caltrans by 2030. Construction of the Capitol South East Connector, including widening White Rock Road and Grant Line Road to six lanes with limited access, could divert some traffic offofU.S. 50 and partially mitigate the project's impact. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Folsom Boulevard and Prairie City Road (Freeway Segment 5). 3A.15-4r
(F'PASP

EIR/XIS)

34.15-4s
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
-99
106
100
Resolution No. 10670

Page 123 of 140 ends

Page 248 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision,
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic impact Fees
and Sacramento Countv Wide
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
D€partment of
Transportation,
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be oerformed
Participate in F'air Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on Eastbound US 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see Mitigation Measures 34. l5-4u, v and w), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this fieeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid tbr by applicant, to reduce the impacts to Eastbound U.S. 50 between Prairie City Road and Oak Avenue Parkway (Freeway Segment 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Slip Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 6), To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that extends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitigation measure 3A. I 5-4u, w and x), and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the rmpacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road slip ramp merge (Freeway Merge 6).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on the U.S, 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7).

To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road slip on ramp should start the eastbound auxiliary lane that exlends to and drops at the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp (see mitieation measure 3A.15-4u. v and x). and the southbound Prairie City Road flyover on ramp should be 3A.15-4r
OPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4u
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.15-4v
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
r06
t01
r06
102
142
t03
Resolution No. 1 0670
Pagel24 of 140

Page 249 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
a building
permit.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condrtion
will be
satisfled
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdrvision.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Betbre project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
tirst subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval of the
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
braided over the Oak Avenue Parkway off ramp and start an extended full auxiliary lane to the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Eastbound / Prairie City Road Flyover On Ramp to Oak Avenue Parkway Off Ramp Weave (Freeway Weave 7)
Participate in Fair Share Funding oflmprovements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Eastbound / Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8). To ensure that Eastbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the southbound Oak Avenue Parkway loop on ramp should merge with the eastbound auxiliary lane that starts at the southbound Prairie City Road braided flyover on ramp and ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp (see mitigation measure 34. l5-4u, v and w). Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to U.S. 50 Eastbound i Oak Avenue Parkway Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 8).

Participate in Fair Share Funding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U.S, 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 27). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Empire Ranch Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that ends at the East Bidwell Street - Scott Road off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Empire Ranch Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this freeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans. The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Empire Ranch Road loop ramp merge (Freeway Merge2T).
3A.15-4w
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.15-4x
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
104
106
I05
Resolution No. 10670

Page 125 of 140 ends

Page 250 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
subdivision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
This subdivision will pay its fair share of
the following improvements with the
payment of Specific Plan Infrastructure
Fees (SPIF), City Traffic Impact Fees
and Sacramento County Wide
Transportation fees collected prior to
building permit issuance in this
subdivision.

This condition will be satisfied prior to
issuance of the 546s building permit in
the Phase 2 portion ofthe Toll Brothers
at Folsom Ranch Regency project in
accordance with previous conditions of
approval. The Phase I portion ofthe
Regency project consists of 545 dwelling
units, The VTSM for the Phase 2 portion
of the Regency project has not yet been
approved by the City Council.

The Capital Southeast Connector -JPA
has executed a construction contract with
Goodfellow Brothers, Inc. to construct
the Capital Southeast Connector from
Prairie City Road to East Bidwell Street.

The construction contract was executed
Sacramento
County
Department of
Transportation.

City ofFolsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
improvement
should be built.

Before project
build out. A
phasing
analysis should
be performed
prior to
approval ofthe
first subdivision
map to
determine
during which
project phase
the
improvement
should be built.

Prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Participate in Fair Share tr'unding of Improvements to Reduce Impacts on U,S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35). To ensure that Westbound US 50 operates at an acceptable LOS, the northbound Prairie City Road loop on ramp should start the westbound auxiliary lane that continues beyond the Folsom Boulevard off ramp. The slip on ramp from southbound Prairie City Road slip ramp would merge into this extended auxiliary lane. Improvements to this fieeway segment must be implemented by Caltrans, The applicant shall pay its proportionate share of funding of improvements, as may be determined by a nexus study or other appropriate and reliable mechanism paid for by applicant, to reduce the impacts to the U.S. 50 Westbound / Prairie City Road Loop Ramp Merge (Freeway Merge 35).

East Bidwell Street/Regency Parkway (Driveway #6). Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall construct the intersection as shown in Figure 4-2 of the Addendum:

Northbound: one thru lane and one left turn lane in a I 50-foot pocket with 60-loot taper, Southbound: one thru lane and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with 60-foot taper; Westbound: one shared lane, plus a 300-foot northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street to receive left-turns from Regency Parkway (a second northbound lane on East Bidwell Sheet starting from Regency Parkway is equivalent to the 300-foot acceleration lane); and > Control: side-street-stop-control;
Note that unsignalized left turns to East Bidwell Street are against City poticy. The northbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in Folsom Plan Area Specific Plan, and plan area fees paid by the Project contribute towards its construction in the fuhre.

Erst Bidwell StreetMhite Rock Road, Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority project has programmed to relocate and signalize the East Bidwell StreetMhite Rock Road intersection as shown in the October 2017 geometric conceptual drawing, or equivalent improvements (i.e., three southbound approach lanes, four eastbound approach lanes, and three westbound approach lanes). Figure 4-3 of the Addendum provides a conceptual 3A.15-4y
OPASP
ErR/XrS)

4.17-l
(Addendum)

4.17-2
(Addendum)
106
106
106
107
106
r08
Resolution No. 10670

Page 126 of 140 ends

Page 251 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
subdrvision
Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit.

Yes
in December of 2020. Grading and
construction commenced in April 2021
The project will include the relocation
and signalization of the existing White
Rock Road/East Bidwell Street
intersection. The owner/applicant will
pay the Sacramento County
Transportation Development Fee prior to
issuance of all building permits in the
subdivision.

The Community Development
Department has reviewed and approved
the improvement plans for the
construction of these required
improvements including the plans for the
modification to the existing traffic signal
at the intersection of East Bidwell Street
and Mangini Parkway. These
improvements are cunently under
construction.

The required improvements in this
condition have been completed and
accepted by the City. These
improvements were constructed as part
of the off-site improvements for the
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Signalize the
intersection and
conduct all
geometric
improvements,
with the
exception of the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase I
building
permits.

Construct the
second
northbound thru
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 2
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
intersection layout for this mitigation. Under this scenario, fair share is defined as the project's responsibility to the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. The project applicant is required to pay the Sacramento County Transportation Development Fee. Option A can be considered to be implemented once the JPA has let contracts for construction of the new intersection. This will insure that the mitigation is constructed before project traffic adds five or more seconds of delay to the intersection.
(B) Signalize the existing East Bidwell StreetAVhite Rock Road intersection with the existing geometry Figure 4-4 of the Addendum provides a conceptual intersection layout for this mitigation.

East Bidwell Street/Mangini Parkway, Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall signalize the intersection with the following geome try @igure 4-5 of the Addendum):
> Northbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, two th'ru lanes, and one right- turn lane in a I 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper (the second tluu lane shall be developed 300 feet south of the intersection);
> Southbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right- tum lane in a I 50-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper;
> Eastbound and westbound: One left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-foot taper, one thru lane, and one right-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket with a 60-lbot taper.

Note that northbound East Bidwell street will remain at two lanes from Mangini Parkway to US 50.

East Bidwell Street/Savannah Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers site, the project applicant shall reconstruct the rntersection with the following geometry (Figure 4-6 of the Addendum):
> Northbound approach: One thru lane and one shared through-right lane with a 150-foot taper; > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane; > Westbound approach; One left turn lane in a 60-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and one through lane;

4.17-3
(Addendum)

4.17-4
(Addendum)
106
t09
r06
110
Resolution No. 10670

Page 127 of 140 ends

Page 252 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a building
permit in
the
subdivision
Mangini Ranch Phase 2, Village No. 7
subdivision.

The Community Development
Department has approved the plans for
the reconstruction and signalization of
the East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek
Parkway intersection in accordance with
this condition.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.

Construct all
geometric
improvements
with the
exception of
one thru
northbound lane
and one thru
southbound
Iane prior to
issuance of
phase 1
building
permits.

Construct the
second thru
northbound lane
and the second
thru southbound
lane prior to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits.
> Southbound departure: Construct a southbound receiving and acceleration lane for westbound left turn traffic. The acceleration lane should be in a 300-foot pocket plus an appropriate taper.

Note that unsignalized left tums to East Bidwell Street are against City policy. The southbound acceleration lane on East Bidwell Street is an interim configuration until the intersection wanants signalization.

Signalization will be triggered as part of the entitlement process on neighboring parcels. A future signal at this location is included in FPASP, and plan area fees paid by the project applicant contribute towards its construction in the future,
East Bidwell Street/Alder Creek Parkway. Prior to buildout of the Toll Brothers Site, the project applicant shall reconstruct and signalize the intersection as shown in Figure 4-7 ofthe Addendum:
> Northbound approach: One U-turn lane in a 150-foot pocket with a 60-fbot taper, two through lanes, and one right turn lane in a 150-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper. > Southbound approach: One left turn lane in a 240-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper, and two through lanes.

The second southbound through lane can be dropped south of Old Ranch Way. > Westbound approach: One right turn lane, plus one left-turn lane in a 200-foot pocket plus 60-foot taper.

The above mitigations are consistent with the ultimate geometry for East Bidwell near Alder Creek Pkwy and builds on conditions of approval from neighboring projects.

4.17-S
(Addendum)
I06
llt
Resolution No. 10670

Page 128 of 140 ends

Page 253 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satisfied
prior to
issuance of
a
Certificate
of
Occupancy
in the
Phase 3
subdivision
Yes
Yes
The Capital Southeast Connector-JPA
project rs cunently under construction.

The Connector project will implement
and complete Option A in this condition.

The owner/applicant shall implement the
required improvements to the
intersection in compliance with this
condition prior to issuance of the first
Certificate ofOccupancy in the Phase 3
(Traditional Subdivision) portion of the
project.

The Phase I Sanitary Sewer
infrastructure including the off-site
sewer trunk main, the Alder Creek
Parkway sewer lift station and forced
main to serve this subdivision have been
constructed by the FPA landowners and
have been completed and accepted by
the City and are cunently in operation.

The City obtained a letter from Regional
San which provides verification that
there is adequate capacity in the existing
Regional San conveyance and treatment
system to accommodate the entire
Folsom Plan Area at buildout.

Confirmation from Regional San was
required because the Folsom Plan Area
is served bv the existins Resional San
Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Utilities and Service Systems
Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
Prror to
issuance of
phase 3
building
permits
Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Betbre approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits tbr any
project phases.

White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Parkway. Prior to project buildout, the project applicant shall implement either (A) or (B) below:
(A) The Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority (JPA) project has programmed to realign this portion of White Rock Road and build a partial signal to accommodate anticipated U-Turns. Expand or construct a signalized intersection as follows:
> Southbound. A single shared lane for left and right turns. > Eastbound: A thru lane and a leff,{J-turn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Westbound: A thru lane and a right-turn in 300-foot pocket plus taper. > Signalize with protected phasing for left-turns and U-tums. > Geometric design shall be consistent with Capital Southeast Connector Joint Powers Authority adopted standards.
(B) Channelize the White Rock Road/Oak Avenue Pkwy intersection on the existing White Rock Road alignment to restrict turning movements to westbound right turns and southbound right turns. The westbound right turn requires a 365-foot deceleration lane, and the southbound right turn requires a 960-foot acceleration lane. Figure 4-8 ofthe Addendum provides a conceptual layout for the mitigated intersection.

Submit Proof of Adequate On- and Off-Site Wastewater Conveyance F'acilities and Implement On- and Off-Site Infrastructure Service Systems or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured. Before the approval of the final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of all project phases shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate wastewater conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured through payment of the City's iacilities augmentation fee as described under the Folsom Municipal Code Title 3, Chapter 3.40, "Facilities Augmentation Fee - Folsom South Area Facilities Plan," or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. Both on*ite wastewater conveyance infrastructure and offxite force main sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount ofdevelopment identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction of the City.

Demonstrate Adequate SRWTP Wastewater Treatment Capacity. The project applicant(s) of all project phases shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the SRWTP for new wastewater flows generated by the project. This shall involve preparing a tentative maplevel study and paying connection and capacity fees as identified by SRCSD. Approval ofthe final map and issuance ofbuilding permits for all project phases shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate SRWTP capacity is available for the amount of development identified in the tentative map.

4.17-6
(Addendum)

34.16-1
(FPASP
f,rR/f,rs)
3A.16-3
(FPASP
f,IR/ErS)
106
tt2
r06
lt3
r06
114
Resolution No. 1 0670

Page 129 of 140 ends

Page 254 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Lift Station on Iron Point Road. The City
Sewer Lift Station and Forced Main
which connects to the Regional San Lift
Station has been accepted by the City
and is currently in operation.

The owner/applicant has constructed the
necessary intrastructure to provide
potable waterto the subdivision The
potable Phase I water infrastructure for
the Folsom Plan Area has been reviewed,
approved and accepted by the City and is
currently in operation.

The off-site potable water infrastructure
to serve the subdivision has been
reviewed, approved and accepted by the
City and is cunently in operation. In
addition, the City has verified that the
off-site potable water infrastructure is
adequate to serve the subdivision.

This condition is not applicable to this
subdivision. The water supply for this
subdivision is provided by the City of
Folsom Water Treatment Plant rather
than an Off-Site Water Treatment Plant
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department and
City of Folsom
EWR
Department
Before approval
of tinal maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
of final maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Before approval
offinal maps
and issuance of
building
permits for any
project phases.

Submit Proof of Surface Water Supply Availability. a. Prior to approval of any small-lot tentative subdivision map subject to Government Code Seclion 66473.7 (SB 221), the City shall comply with that statute. Prior to approval of any smalllot tentative subdivision map for a proposed residential project not subject to that statute, the City need not comply with Section 66473.7, or formally consult with any public water system that would provide water to the affected area; nevertheless, the City shall make a factual showing or impose conditions similar to those required by Section 66473.7 to ensure an adequate water supply for development authorized by the map. b. Prior to recordation of each final subdivision map, or pnor to City approval of any similar project-specific discretionary approval or entitlement required for nonresidential uses, the project applicant(s) ofthat project phase or activity shall demonstrate the availability of a reliable and sufficient water supply from a public water system for the amount of development that would be authorized by the final subdivision map or project-specific discretionary nonresidential approval or entitlement. Such a demonstration shall consist of information showing that both existing sources are available or needed supplies and improvements will be in place prior to occupancy.

Submit Proof of Adequate Ofl-Site Water Conveyance tr'acilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured, Before the approval of the final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, the project applicant(s) of any particular discretionary development application shall submit proof to the City of Folsom that an adequate off-site water conveyance system either has been constructed or is ensured or other sureties to the City's satisfaction. The off-site water conveyance infrastructure sufficient to provide adequate service to the project shall be in place for the amount ofdevelopment identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final subdivision map and issuance of building permits for all project phases, or their financing shall be ensured to the satisfaction ofthe City. A certificate of occupancy shall not be issued for any building within the SPA until the water conveyance iniiastructure sufTicient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Demonstrate Adequate Off-Site Water Treatment Capacity (if the Off-Site Water Treatment Plant Option is Selected), If an off*ite water treatment plant (WTP) alternative is selected (as opposed to the on- site WTP alternative), the project applicant(s) for any particular discretionary development application shall demonstrate adequate capacity at the off-site WTP. This shall involve preparing a tentatlve map-level study and paying connection and capacity fees as determined by the City. Approval ofthe final project map shall not be granted until the City verifies adequate water treatment capacity either is available or is certain to be available when needed for the amount of development identified in the tentative map before approval ofthe final map and issuance of buildine permits for all proiect phases. A certificate of occuDancv shall not be

34.18-1
(FPASP

EIR/EIS)
3A.18-2a
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
3A.lE-2b
(FPASP
ErR/[rs)
106
lls
106
1r6
106
117
Resolution No. 10670

Page 130 of 140 ends

Page 255 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condition
will be
satistled
prior to
approval of
a future
TMP,
The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction of the
City
Additional Measures
City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval of first
tentative map or
drscretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

Highway 50.
issued for any building within the SPA until the water treatment capacity sufficient to serve such building has been constructed and is in place.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce f,xposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Emissions of Toxic Air Contaminants from Quarry Truck Traffic, The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input ofthe City ofFolsom, the City ofRancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry project in November 201 0, it also adopted conditions of approval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility of truck traffic from the quarries with the future urban development in the Folsom Specific Plan area and otherjurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts ofannual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility unhl a TMP is adopted. The City of Folsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities ofthe quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions, such as the approval and implementation of specialized road improvements to accommodate quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15381), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City. In a responsible agency role, the City would follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for aTMP has been developed as ofthe completion ofthis FEIRTFEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the implementation of as-yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative air quality impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the risk of cancer to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA from toxic air contaminant emissions to no more than 296 in one million (SMAQMD 2009.

Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure AIR-
l-Land
(FPASP
ErR/f,rs)
106
I18
Resolution No. 10670

Page 131 of 140 ends

Page 256 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

March. Recommended Protocol for Evaluating the Location of Sensitive Land Uses Adjacent to Major Roadways, Version 2 2:7), or such different tlueshold of significance mandated by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any. With this mitigation, the cumulative air quality impacts from truck toxic air contaminants would be less than significant.

As an alternative (or in addition) to implementing the TMP within the SPA, the following measures could (and should) be voluntarily implemented by the quarry project applicant(s) (Teichert, DeSilva Gates, and Granite [Walltown]) to help ensure exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs generated by quarry truck traffic to the 296-in-one-million threshold of significance identified above. The City encourages implementation of the following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City of Folsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis and/or Health fusk Assessment (HRA) should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the truck applicant($ for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway segments that are identified in Table 4-4 as being potentially significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. Each project- level analysis shall be performed according to the standards set forth by SMAQMD for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers, The projecllevel analysis shall account for the location of the receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, the prqected future traffic volume for the year 2030 (including the proportion ofdiesel trucks), and emission rates representative ofthe vehicle fleet for the year when the sensitive land uses would first become operational and/or occupied. If the incremental increase in cancer risk determined by in the HM exceeds 296 in one million (or a different threshold of significance recommended by SMAQMD or ARB at the time, if any), then project design mitigation should be employed, which may include the lbllowing:
. Increase the setback distance between the roadway and affected receptor. If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be necessary, based on the results of the HRA, the quarry truck applicant(s) should pay the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s) and the City of Folsom a fee that shall serve as compensation for lost development profit and lost City tax revenues, all as determined by the parties, Said mitigation t'ee shall be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks shall be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
. Implement tiered tree planting of fine-needle species, such as redwood, along the near side of the roadway segments and, if feasible, along the roadway 500 feet in both directions of the initial planting (e.g., 500 feet north and south ofa roadway that runs east-west) to enhance the dispersion and filtration of mobile-source TACs associated with the adjacent roadway. These trees should be planted at a density such that a solid visual buffer is achieved after the trees reach maturitv. which breaks the line of sisht Resolution No. 10670

Page 132 of 140 ends

Page 257 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Condrtion
will be
satisfied
prior to
approval of
a future
TMP,
The Community Development
Department and the Public Works
Department will work closely to
implement the future Truck Management
Plan (TMP) and coordinate responses to
any future entitlement and CEQA
compliance need for the TMP and make
sure the requirements in this condition of
approval are met to the satisfaction of the
City.

City of Folsom
Community
Development
Department
Prior to
approval of first
tentative map or
discretionary
approval within
SPA that would
place sensitive
receptors along
roadways that
quarry trucks
would
reasonably use
to access U.S.

50. between U. S. 50 and the proposed homes. These trees should be planted before occupation of any affected sensitive land uses. This measure encourages the planting ofthese trees in advance ofthe construction of potentially affected receptors to allow the trees to become established and progress toward maturity. The life of these trees should be maintained through the duration of the quany projects. The planting, cost, and ongoing maintenance ofthese trees should be funded by the quarry project applicant(s),
. To improve the indoor au quality at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe attected residences and schools:
. equip all affected residences and school buildings developed in the SPA with High Efficiency Particle Arresting (HEPA) filter systems at all mechanical air intake points to the interior rooms; . use the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to maintain all residential units under positive pressure at all times;
. locate air intake systems for HVAC as far away from roadway air pollution sources as possible; and . develop and implement an ongoing education and maintenance plan about the filhation systems associated with HVAC for residences and schools.

To the extent this indoor air quality mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South ofU.S. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within ihe SPA.

Implement East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan or Other Measures to Reduce Exposure of Sensitive Receptors to Operational Noise from Quarry Truck Traffic, The City of Folsom is a participant in the development of an East Sacramento Regional Aggregate Mining Truck Management Plan (TMP), a cooperative effort led by the County of Sacramento, with the input of the City of Folsom, the City of Rancho Cordova and other interested parties, including representatives of quarry project applicants. When the County Board of Supervisors approved entitlements for the Teichert quarry prqect in November 2010, it also adopted conditions ofapproval and a development agreement that requires Teichert's participation in, and fair share funding of, a TMP to implement roadway capacity and safety improvements required to improve the compatibility oftruck traffic from the quanies with the future urban development in the SPA and other jurisdictions that will be affected by quarry truck traffic. The development agreement adopted by the County for the Teichert project imposes limits on the amounts of annual aggregate sales from Teichert's facility until a TMP is adopted. The City ofFolsom does not have directjurisdiction over the Teichert, DeSilva Gates, or Walltown quarry project applicants as these projects are located within the unincorporated portion of the County. The County, as the agency with the primary authority over the quanies, has indicated that it intends to prepare an environmental analysis in accordance with CEQA prior to adoption of a TMP. The City's authority to control the activities of the quarry trucks includes restrictions or other actions" such as the aooroval and imolementation of specialized road imDrovements to accommodate Cumulative
Mitigation
Measure
NOISE-1-Land
(FPASP
ErR/ErS)
106
r19
Resolution No. 10670

Page 133 of 140 ends

Page 258 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
quarry truck traffic, that would be applicable within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. For the foregoing reasons, the City of Folsom considers itself a "responsible agency" (as that term is defined at State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 1538 I ), in that it has some discretionary power over some elements of a future TMP, if such TMP calls for improvements or other activities on roadways within the jurisdiction of the City.

In a responsible agency role, the City woutd follow the process specified in the CEQA Guidelines for consideration and approval of the environmental analysis prepared by the County for a TMP after such documentation is prepared and adopted by the County. (State CEQA Guidelines, CCR Section 15096.) Because no final project description for a TMP has been developed as of the completion of this FEIR/FEIS, the City would have to speculate as to those portions of a TMP that might be proposed for implementation within its jurisdiction, or the impacts that could arise from the of as yet uncertain components. Accordingly, formulation of the precise means of mitigating the potential cumulative noise impacts pursuant to the TMP is not cunently feasible or practical. However, as the preferred, feasible, and intended mitigation strategy to address the cumulative impacts of quarry truck traffic through the SPA, the City shall implement, or cause to be implemented those portions of the TMP (as described above) that are within its authority to control. In implementing the TMP, the City shall ensure that the TMP or traffic measures imposed by the City within the SPA reduce the traffic noise exposure to sensitive receptors along routes within the SPA so as to ensure that sensitive receptors are not exposed to interior noise levels in excess of45 dBA, or increases in interior noise levels of 3 dBA or more, whichever is more resfrictive. Wlth this mitigation, the cumulative noise impacts from truck traffic would be less than significant.

The City encourages implementation ofthe following measures:
> The quarry project applicant(s) should meet with the City ofFolsom to discuss mitigation strategies, implementation, and cost.
> A site-specific, project-level screening analysis should be conducted by the City of Folsom and funded by the quarry truck applicant(s) for all proposed sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) in the SPA that would be located along the sides of roadway segments that a-re identified in Table 4-8 as being potenhally significant under any of the analyzed scenarios. The analysis should be conducted using an approved three dimensional traffic noise modeling program (i,e., TNM or SoundPlan). Each project- level analysis should be performed according to the standards set forth by the City of Folsom for the purpose of disclosure to the public and decision makers. The project-level analysis should account for the location ofthe receptors relative to the roadway, their distance from the roadway, and the projected future traffic volume for the vear 2030 (includine the Dercentase of heaw trucks). If the incremental Resolution No. 10670
Page I 34 of 140

Page 259 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

The FPA landowners have satisfied all of
the mitigation measures for the design
and construction of the Phase I Water
Crty of Folsom
Community
Development
Belbre approval
of final maps
and issuance of
increase in traffic noise levels are determined to exceed the threshold of significance recommended by the City of Folsom, then design mitigation should be employed, which may include the following:
> Model the benefits of soundwalls (berm/wall combination) along the quarry truck hauling roadways and affected receptors not to exceed a total height of eight feet (two-foot berm and six-foot concrete mason wall). If this mitigation measure is determined by the City of Folsom to be inadequate, additional three dimensional traffic noise modeling should be conducted with the inclusion of rubberized asphalt at the expense of the quarry truck applicant(s). No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation has been agreed upon by the City of Folsom and fees for construction of said mitigation are paid by the quarry truck applicant(s). > Implement the installation ofrubberized asphalt (quiet pavement) on roadway segments adjacent to sensitive receptors that cany quarry trucks if soundwalls do not provide adequate reduction of traffrc noise levels. The inclusion of rubberized asphalt would provide an additional 3 to 5 dB of traffic noise reduction. The cost of construction using rubberized asphalt should be borne by the quarry truck applicant(s). Said mitigation fee should be determined in consultation with the quarry project applicant(s), the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project applicant(s), and the City of Folsom. No quarry trucks should be allowed to pass on any roadway segment immediately adjacent to or within the SPA until said mitigation fees are paid.
> To improve the indoor noise levels at affected receptors, implement the following measures before the occupancy ofthe affected residences and schools.
' Conduct an interior noise analysis once detailed construction plans ofresidences adjacent to affected roadways are available to determine the required window package at second and third floor receptors to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn without quarry trucks. . Determine the interior quarry truckfaffic noise level increases at second and third floor receptors adjacent to affected roadways compared to no quarry truck conditions. Window package upgrades are expected to be necessary due to the traffic noise level increases caused by quarry trucks along affected roadways. Quarry truck applicant(s) should pay for the cost of window package upgrades (increased sound transmission class rated windows) required to achieve the interior noise level standard of 45 dB Ldn with the inclusion of quarry truck traftlc.

To the extent this noise mitigation would not already be implemented as part of the Folsom South of U.W. 50 Specific Plan project development, this mitigation should be paid for by the quarry project applicant(s) before any quarry trucks are allowed to pass on any roadway that is within 400 feet of any residence or school within the SPA.

Coordinate and Fund the Backbone Infrastructure and Off-Site Water Facility Alternative, The project applicant shall participate in the FPASP owners' group and shall fund and contribute their fair share to the backbone infrastructure and off+ite water facility altemative improvements. The project applicant shall N/A106
t20
Resolution No. 10670
Page I 35 of I 40

Page 260 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
and Sewer Backbone Infrastructure to
serve the first of development in the
FPA. The Phase 1 backbone
Infrastrucfure was completed and
accepted by the City in 20 I 8 and is
cunently in use in the FPA and being
owned and operated by the City. The off-
site water facility altemative
improvements were not implemented.

The water for the FPA was provided
through the conservation of existing
water in the City. The new water supply
alternative was validated in 2014
Department and
City of Folsom
Public Works
Department
building
permits for any
project phase,
the project
applicant shall
demonstrate to
the City's
satisfaction the
fair share
contribution
towards
implementation
of Backbone
Infrastrucfure
and Off-Site
Water Facility
improvements
and associated
required
mitigation as
identified in the
Folsont South of
U.S. Highwav
50 Backbone
Infrastructure
Mitigated
Negative
Declaration
(December
2014) or the
Revised
Proposed Ofl-
Site Water
Facility
Alternative
Addendum to
the FPASP
EINEIS
coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed inlhe Folsom Soulh of U.S.

Highway 5 0 Backb one Infrastructure Mitigated Negativ e Declaration (December 20 I 4):
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-l: Design above ground pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure I-2: Develop and implement a landscaping plan for pump station and storage tank facilities to reduce visual impacts.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-l: Prepare and Implement NOX Reduction Plan > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-2: Pay Off-site Mitigatron Fee to SMAQMD to off-set NOX Emissions Generated by Constructron.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure III-4: Implement A Site Investigation to Determine the Presence of NOA and, if necessary, Prepare and Implement an Asbestos Dust Control Plan. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l: Conduct Special'Status Plant Surveys; Implement Avoidance and Mitigation Measures or Compensatory Mitigation
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-2: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion (BO) for Federally Lisled Vernal Pool Invertebrates.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-3: Implement Conditions of the Biological Opinion for Impacts on Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-4: Western Spadefoot Toad > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-5: Western Pond Turtle > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(a): Swainson's Hawk Nesting Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-6(b): Swainson's Hawk Foraging Habitat > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-7. Tncolored Blackbird > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-8:Nesting Raptors
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-9: Nesting Special Status Birds and Migratory Birds > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-10: Special-Status Bats > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-12: Implement Section 1602 Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-13: Conduct Suweys to Identify and Map Valley Needlegrass Grassland; Implement Avoidance and Minimization Measures or Compensatory Mitigation, if necessary > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-14: Secure Amended Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit and Section 401 Permit and Implement All Permit Conditions; Ensure No Net Loss of Functions of Wetlands, Other Waters of the U,S., and Waters of the State Resolution No. 10670

Page 136 of 140 ends

Page 261 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
(approved
December
2012); as
applicable.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-15: Conduct Tree Survey, Prepare and Implement an Oak Woodland Mitigation Plan, Replace Native Oak Trees Removed, and implement Measures to Avoid and Minimize Indirect Impacts on Oak Trees and Oak Woodland Habitat Retained On-Site. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IV-l l: American Badger > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-l: Comply with the applicable procedures in the FAPA and implementation of applicable historic property treatment plans > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure V-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-l: Prepare Site-Specific Geotechnical Report per CBC Requirements and Implement Appropriate Recommendations. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-3: Monitor Earthwork durrng Earthmoving Activities. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(a): Prepare and Implement the Appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-5(b): Prepare and Implement the appropriate Grading and Erosion Control Plan for the detention basin West of Prairie City Road. > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure IX-l: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs.
> Backbone MND Mitigation Measure MI-l: Greenhouse Gas Emissions > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XVI-I: Prepare and Implement a Construction Traffic Control Plan.
> Backbone MND Mrtigation Measure III-3: North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone ltND Mitigation Measure V-4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure VI-2 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure Vl-4 North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements > Backbone MND Mitigation Measure XII-I North of U.S. Highway 50 Water Improvements In addition, the project applicant shall coordinate with owners' group to implement the following measures detailed in the Revised Proposed Off-Site Vy'ater Facility Alternative Addendum to the FPASP EINEIS (approved December 11, 2012):
> 3B.l-2a. Enhance Exterior Appearance of Structural Facilities.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 137 of 140 ends

Page 262 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.
> 38.l-2b: Prepare LandscapingPlan.
> 38. l-3a: Conformance to Construction Lighting Standards. > 38 l-3b: Prepare and Submrt a Lighting Master Plan.
> 38.2-la. Develop and implement a Construction NOX Reduction Plan. > 3B.2-lc: Implement Fugitive Dust Control Measures and a Particulate Matter Monitoring Program during Construction.
> 3B2-3a: Cite Pump Siting Buffers Away from Sensitive Receptors. > 3B,2-3b: Conduct Project-Level DPM Screening and Implement Measures to Reduce Annual DPM to Acceptable Concentrations.
> 3B.4'la: Implement GHG Reduction Measures during Construction. > 38.4-1b Prepare and Implement an Off+ite Water Facilities Climate Action Plan. > 34.5-1a: Comply with the Programmatic Agreement.
> 3A.5-lb: Perform an Inventory and Evaluation ofCultural Resources for the California Register of Historic Places, Minimize or Avoid Damage or Destruction, and Perform Treatment Where Damage or Destruction Cannot be Avoided.
> 3A.5-2: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Conduct On-Site Monitoring if Required, Stop Work if Cultural Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance ofthe Find, and Perform Treatment or Avoidance as Required.
> 3A.5-3: Suspend Ground-Disturbing Activities if Human Remains are Encountered and Comply with California Health and Safety Code Procedures.
> 38,7-la: Prepare Geotechnical Report(s) for the Revised Proposed Off+ite Water Facilities and Implement Required Measures.
> 38.7-1b' Incorporate Pipeline Failure Contingency Measures Into Final Pipeline Design. > 3B.7-4. Implement Conosion Protection Measures.
> 38.7-5: Conduct Construction Personnel Education, Stop Work ifPaleontological Resources are Discovered, Assess the Significance of the Find, and Prepare and Implement a Recovery Plan as Required.
> 3B.8-la: Transport, Store, and Handle Construction-Related Hazardous Matenals in Compliance with Relevant Regulations and Guidelines.
> 3B,8-1b: Prepare and Implement a Hazardous Materials Management Plan. > 3B.8-5a: Conduct Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for Selected Alignment.

Resolution No. 10670

Page 138 of 140 ends

Page 263 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

YesThe Capital Southeast Connector - JPA
project commenced construction in April
2021. Since the project has commenced
with construction this condition has been
satisfied.
cD (E)M
> 3B.8-5b: Develop and Implement a Remediation Plan.
> 38.8-7a: Keep Construction Area Clear of Combustible Materials. > 3B.8-7b: Provide Accessible Fire Suppression Equipment. > 3B.9-la: Acquire Appropriate Regulatory Permits and Prepare and Implement SWPPP and BMPs, > 38,9-1b: Properly Dispose of Hydrostatic Test Water and Construction Dewatering in Accordance with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. > 3B.9-3a, Prepare and Implement Drainage Plan(s) for Structural Facilities. > 38.9-3b: Ensure the Provision of Sufficient Outlet Protection and On-site Containment. > 38.11-1a: Limit Construction Hours.
> 38.11-1b: Minimize Noise from Construction Equipment and Staging. > 38,I l-1c: Maximize the Use of Noise Baniers.
> 3B. I I -1 d: Prohibit Non-Essential Noise Sources During Construction. > 3B. I 1-l e: Monitor Construction Noise and Provide a Mechanism for Filing Noise Complaints. > 38.I I -3: Implement Operational Noise Minimization Measures. > 38.12-1 Provide tbr Continued Recreational Access as Identrtied in Mitigation Measure 3.14-la. > 38.15-1a: Prepare Traffrc Control Plan.
> 38. l5-1b: Assess Pre-Off-site Water Facilities Roadway Conditions. > 38.l6-3a: Minimize Utility Conflicts by Implementing an Underground Services Alert. > 38 l6-3b: Coordinate with Utility Providers and Implement Appropriate Installation Methods to Minimize Potential Utility Service Disruptions.
> 38.17 -la. Implement Construction Dewatering Best Management Practices. > 38.17-lb: Implement a Dewatering Discharge Monitoring Program > 3A. I 8-l : Submit Proof of Surtace Water Supply Availability. > 3A. l8-2a: Submit Proof of Adequate Off-Site Water Conveyance Facilities and Implement Off-Site Infrastructure Service System or Ensure That Adequate Financing Is Secured.

White Rock Road Shoulder Improvements
The owner/applicant shall construct shoulder improvements along the project's entire frontage of westbound White Rock Road to the satisfaction of the City prior to approval of the first small lot final map. In lieu of constructing the aforementioned interim shoulder improvements, the owner/applicant may enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement with the City and post

20. Resolution No. 10670
Page I 39 of 140

Page 264 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

YesThis condition will apply to the futwe
Phase 3 (Traditional Subdivision) and
therefore does not apply to the Phase lD
subdivision.
cD (E) (P)
cD (E) (P)
M
M
adequate security to the City's satisfaction to ensure construction ofsaid improvements; the security shall be for a mimmum period of 10 years.

Ifshoulder improvements are constructed and/or funded by the owner/applicant, then said costs may be included in any applicable fee program established and approved for the Folsom Plan Area subject to approval by the City and the actual costs expended by the owner/applicant may therefore be eligible for a credit and/or relmbursement.

If construction ofthe Capital Southeast Connector Project between Scott Road and the El Dorado County line has commenced during the term of the required Subdivision Improvement Agreement, then the shoulder improvement condition will be deemed satisfied and the security shall be released to the owner/applicant.

The owner/applicant shall preserve the oak trees shown in the blue color on the attached Site Plan Exhibit for the Traditional Subdivision. The owner/applicant shall also make every attempt to preserve the tree shown in red on the attached Site Plan Exhibit provided that the City Arborist concurs(sincethisoaktreewillbeapproximately3'lowerthanadjacentpadgrades). The additional land created from elimination of lots 49, 56, and 57 as shown on the Site Plan Exhibit shall be incorporated into the adjacent residential lots to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development Department. Consistent with FPASP Policy 10.19, the Community Development Director will allow modifications to the development standards to order to accommodate preservation ofthe oak tree on Lot 62 as shown on the attached Site Plan Exhibit. This condition shall be satisfied nrior to aooroval ofthe Final Mao for the Traditional Subdivision.

21. Resolution No. 10670

Page 140 of 140 ends

Page 265 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Page 266 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.9.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re ort

RECOMMENDATION / COIINCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council move to adopt Resolution No. 10867 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Non-Exclusive Agreements with Approved Licensed Contractors to Implement the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Inter-Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On June 9,2020, the City Council approved Resolution No. 10463 which authorized the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) for continued participation in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program from January 1,2021to December 31, 2023. As part of the city's participation in CDBG, the City Manager is currently in process to enter into an Inter-Agency Contract with SHRA to receive $200,000 in CDBG funds to subsidize the City of Folsom Seniors Helping Seniors (SHS) Program for FY 202212023.

On June 8, 2021, the City Council approved Resolution No. 10640, authorizing the City Manager to execute agreements with a total of seven contractors (ABC Home Improvements, Benchmark Plumbing, F.L. Electric Service Company, Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc., Robnett Construction, Inc., Roseville Sheet Metal Inc., and Sacramento City Building Co.) to perform contractor services in accordance with the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) Seniors Helping Seniors (SHS) Inter-Agency Contract.

I
MEETING DATE: 61t412022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10867 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Non-Exclusive Agreements with Approved Licensed Contractors to Implement the Sacramento Housing and
Redevelopment Agency Inter-Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program
FROM: Community Development Department

Page 267 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.10.

For Fiscal Year 2021-22 the City Manager approved annual contracts with six of the seven Senior Helping Seniors contractors (ABC Home Improvements, Benchmark Plumbing, F.L.

Electric Service Company, Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc., Roseville Sheet Metal Inc., and Sacramento City Building Co.). The seventh contractor, Robnett Construction, Inc. elected not to continue participation in the program. The existing six non-exclusive agreements will terminate on June 30, 2022 and staff is recommending that the City Manager be authorized to execute new contracts with the six aforementioned contractors which will be in effect until June 30,2023 and with a not-to-exceed amount of $200,000 (total aggregate amount for all contractors).

POLICY / RIII,E,
In accordance with Section 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code, City Council approval is required for professional services contracts in excess of$66,141.

ANALYSIS
The Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program is available to all low-income, age- qualified senior citizens who reside in the City of Folsom. The program is designed to assist those seniors who do not have the assets or financial capability to make necessary home repairs related to health and safety. Both manufactured homes and non-manufactured homes are eligible for the program. On average, the City's SHS Program responds to over 300 calls for service each year.

A total of six contractors previously submitted their qualification packages to the City and currently perform contractor services in accordance with the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program. With approval of this resolution and the necessary contracts (not-to-exceed a combined total of $200,000 for all said contracts), the following contractors will continue to assist the City with providing contractor services as needed for the SHS Program:

ABC Home Improvements
Benchmark Plumbing
F.L. Electric Service Company
Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc.

Roseville Sheet Metal Inc.

Sacramento City Building Co.

Each ofthe six contractors are qualified to provide a range ofcontracting services necessary for the SHS Program. Furthernore, all six contractors are experienced in small home repairs and working with low-income senior citizens and/or physically disabled homeowners.

F'INANCIAI,IMPACT
There is no financial impact to the General Fund. The CDBG funding program requires the expenditure of funds with reimbursement requested and therefore the Community

1. 2.

4. 5.

6. 2 Page 268
06/14/2022 Item No.10.

Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201) is utilized to cover the upfront contractor and material costs and invoices are sent to SHRA monthly for reimbursement from the grant proceeds. For the Fiscal Year 2022-23, atotal of $220,000 of the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 201) has been appropriated for the SHS Program to cover the cost of materials and outside contractors.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
This action by the City Council is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(bX3) (Review for Exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act.

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10867 - A Resolulion Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Non-Exclusive Agreements with Approved Licensed Contractors to Implement the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency Inter-Agency Contract for the Seniors Helping Seniors Home Repair Program
Submitted,
Pam Johns, Community Development Director
aJ Page 269
06/14/2022 Item No.10.

RESOLUTION NO. 10867

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
NON.EXCLUSIVE AGREEMENTS WITH APPROVED LICENSED CONTRACTORS

TO IMPLEMENT THE SACRAMENTO HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY INTER.AGENCY CONTRACT F'OR THE

SENIORS HELPING SENIORS HOME REPAIR PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 10463, adopted by the City Council on June 9,2020, authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement with the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency (SHRA) for continued participation in the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program from January 1,2021to December 31, 2023; and WHEREAS, funds from the CDBG Program subsidize the City's Seniors Helping Seniors (SHS) Program, which provides eligible senior citizens in the City with financial assistance to repair and remedy health and safety hazards in their homes; and WHEREAS, SHRA has allocated $200,000 in CDBG funds to subsidize the City's SHS Program for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and
WHEREAS, the City Manager is required to enter into an Inter-Agency Contract with SHRA to receive the allocated $200,000 CDBG funds; and
WHEREAS, the CDBG funding program requires the expenditure of funds with reimbursement requested and for Fiscal Year 2022-23; and WHEREAS, the proposed Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget, includes an appropriation of $220,000 in the Community Development Block Grant Fund (Fund 20I); and WHEREAS, contractors are selected based on their professional qualifications and experience to perform services under the SHS Program; and WHEREAS, the six contractors (ABC Home Improvements, F.L. Electrical Service Company, Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc., Roseville Sheet Metal Inc., and Sacramento City Building Co.) have existing contracts with the City for performing this work to June 30, 2022; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Chapter 2.36 of the Folsom Municipal Code, contracts of $66,141 or greater shall be approved by the City Council.

NOW' THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute non-exclusive contracts for professional licensed contractor services with ABC Home Improvements, Benchmark Plumbing, F.L. Electric Service Company, Gray Construction and Securement Services, Inc., Roseville Sheet Metal Inc., and Resolution No. 10867

Page 1 ends

Page 270 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.10.

Sacramento City Building Co., to render services under the City's SHS Program through June 30,2023, not-to-exceed a combined total of $200,000 for all said contracts.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES: Councilmember(s):

NOES: Councilmember(s):

ABSENT: Councilmember(s):

ABSTAIN: Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10867
Page2 of2

Page 271 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.10.

This page is intentionally treft blank.

Page 272 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.10.
,.:'i 3-t,1J:1. i ixl;l
i.!nlll.:tlna l. .rr' 4l
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
The Public Works Department recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10869 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to adopt Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, Policies and Procedures for Federal and State-only funded projects.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
The City has received Federal-Aid funding approval for the Intelligent Transportation System Implementation Project. As of January 1,2019, Caltrans is requiring that all agencies utilizing federal and state reimbursement funds have a written procedure adopted by resolution and approved by Caltrans. Although the Master Service Agreement references many similar procedures, Caltrans is requiring each agency to provide a written procedure approved by Caltrans and adopted by the agency's governing body, which describes the consultant selection and procurement procedures for design and construction management contracts.

From Division of Local Assistance Office Bulletin 2l-05:

Title 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 172 (23 CFR 172) allows Caltrans Divisionof Local Assistance (DLA) to prescribe the policies and procedures for engineering and design related services, also known as Architectural and Engineering (AS.E). Local Public Agencies (LPA| are responsible for adopting the written policies and procedures prescribed by the awarding State Transportation Agency 6f4.

I
MEETING DATE: 6/r4/2022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10869 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Adopt Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, Policies and Procedures for Federal and State-only Funded Projects
FROM: Public Works Department

Page 273 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.11.

FHWA's expectation is to achieve a 100% compliance rate in this area. Past process review findings by DLA showed a significant lack of, or incomplete A&E procurement policies and procedures as one of the most commonfindings. A non-compliance of this matter can result in a loss offunds and/or other sanctions.

This action only applies to consultant contracts awarded using Federal-Aid / FHWA funding.

The City will continue to use existing procedures for City-funded projects and will utilize other procedures as required by alternate project funding sources.

POLICY / RULE
Adoption of conhact policies and procedures requires City Council approval

ANALYSIS
In order for the City to be reimbursed for transportation projects funded by state only funding sources, the CiW must adopt Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, policies and procedures. A completed Exhibit 10-C for new or amended federal and/or state funded consultant contracts must be accepted by Caltrans prior to award.

Items not completed in the Exhibit 10-C checklist may jeopardize federal and/or state funding.

FINAIICIAL IMPACT
The adoption of LAPM Chapter 10 will likely not have an impact on the cost of professional services. It will increase the number of staff hours spent on contract procurement and project administration tasks.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental review is not required for adoption ofthis resolution. Each project will evaluate environmental impacts on a project-by-project basis.

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10869 - A Resolution Authorizingthe City Manager to adopt Local Assistance Procedures Manual Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, Policies and Procedures for Federal and State-only Funded Projects
Submitted,
2 Mark Rackovan, Public Works Director

Page 274 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.11.

RESOLUTION NO. 10869
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MAI\AGER TO
ADOPT LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 10, CONSULTANT

SELECTION, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

FOR FEDERAL AND STATE-ONLY FUNDED PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom through the Department of Public Works is responsible for the execution offederal and state funded project(s); and WHEREAS, the provision of 23 CFR 172.5(b), subrecipients shall develop and sustain organizational capacity and provide the resources necessary for the procurement, management, and administration of engineering and design related consultant services, reimbursed in whole or in part with Federal-Aid Highway Program funding as specified in 23 U.S.C. 106(gXa)(A); and WHEREAS, 23 CFR 172.5(bX1) requires subrecipients to adopt written policies and procedures prescribed by the awarding State Transportation Agency for the procurement, management, and administration of engineering and design related consultant services in accordance with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; and WHEREAS, the State of California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has developed the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM), Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, which sets forth policies and procedures for procurements and management of contracts for engineering and design related consultant services contracts on federal and state funded transportation projects to ensure compliance with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; and WHpREAS, LAPM Chapter 10, Consultant Selection, describes the consultant selection and procurement process local agencies must follow to maintain eligibility for federal and state reimbursement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLYED that the City Council of the City of Folsom adopts Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual, Chapterl0, Consultant Selection, and any updates thereto, in the procurement of architectural and engineering services for federal and state- only funded projects.

PASSED AI\D ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2022,by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Councilmember(s):

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10869
Page I ofl
Keri M. Howell, MAYOR

Page 275 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.11.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Page 276 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.11.
,.1
Folsom City Council
Staff rt

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 10872 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Submit an Application for Grant Funds to the United States Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) Hiring Program.

BACKGROT'ND / ISSUE
Since the pre-recession staffing high in 2008, the Folsom Police Department has lost 11 police officer positions. During this same l6-year timespan, the population within the City of Folsom has grown just over 23o/o and lrl.2020, Folsom was rated the second fastest growing city in the state of California. With the rapid development of Folsom's south ofUS Highway 50 properly, the Folsom Police Department is seeking alternate funding sources to support desperptely needed staffing increases.

We pride ourselves on being a full-service organrzation that practices community policing and problem-solving strategies as a matter of course. To maintain that ability in the face of the groWh, we need to add officers that the City can't fully fund at this time.

POLJSY / RULE
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 10405 Amending Financial Policies of the City of Folsom regarding grant administation on April 14,2020. Section D - Intergovernmental MEETING DATE: 61t412022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10872 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Submit an Application for Grant Funds to the United States Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) Hiring Program
F'ROM: Police Department

Page 277 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.12.

Revenues, Paragraph A - Grant Applications states, *Grant application shall be the responsibility of the department seeking the grant. Grant applications which require an expenditure of funds by the City of less than or equal to the City Manager contract authority amount may be approved by the City Manager prior to submittal to the grantor. All other grant applications, including any requiring an ongoing commitment of resources or staff, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council prior to submittal. In circumstances where it is not possible for the City Council to approve the grant application prior to submittal, the City Manager may approve the application subject to the City Council ratification as soon as practicable to do so.

Requests to the City Council or the City Manager for approval of a grant application shall identifr anticipated long-term maintenance and/or renovation costs, required City matching funds, and additional personnel that may be needed if the grant is awarded for a capital project.

With respect to grants for staffing, the source of funds for long-term staffing after the expiration of the grant shall also be identified in the request for approval of the grant application.

All grant applications on behalf of the City shall be reviewed by the Finance Director before submittal to the City Council or the grantor."

ANALYSIS
The City of Folsom and the Folsom Police Department are committed to being a full-service city and agency. The Folsom Police Department is committed to Relentlessly Pursuing Criminal Behavior and Proactively Fostering Positive Relationships throughout the community. With the addition of the three (3) requested entry level police officers, the Folsom Police Department would be able to expand the Neighborhood Services Division as well as the number of officers assigned to patrol services within the operations division to provide partial law enforcement services south of US Highway 50. These officers would be deployed in a manner to address qualrty of life issues, conduct proactive Community Oriented Policing activity, provide additional resources to persons in crisis and proactively foster positive relationships with the citizens and businesses within the city The only allowable costs under Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) Hiring Program are the approved full-time, entry-level salaries and fringe benefits of newly hired or rehired sworn career law enforcement officers who are hired or rehired on or after the award start date.

A "career law enforcement officer" is a person hired on a permanent basis who is authorized by law or by a state, local, or tribal agency to engage in or oversee the prevention, detection, or investigation of violations of criminal laws.

All items other than entry-level personnel costs (salaries and fringe benefits) as described in the preceding section are considered unallowable under COPS Hiring Program Therefore, requests for equipment, training, travel, uniforms, vehicles, and indirect costs are notpermitted under CHP.

In addition, the following personnel costs are unallowable:
2

Page 278 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.12.
.Salaries and fringe benefits of existing locally-funded officers, unless those officers are currently scheduled to be laid off on a specific future date . Salaries and fringe benefits over and above an agency's entry-level salary and fringe beneltts for offrcers
. Salaries and fringe benefits for civilian or nonswom personnel . Salaries and fringe benefits for part-time officer positions . Salaries and fringe benefits for furloughed offrcers
. Salaries and fringe benefits for correctional officers . Overtime costs, severance pay, hazafipay
The Chief of Police requests approval to apply for the United States Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) Hiring Program for three (3) entry level police officers.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
FY 2022 COPS Hiring Program awards will cover up to 75 percent of the entry-level salary and fringe benefits for each approved position for a three-year funding period, based on the applicant's current entry level salary levels for full-time officers. There is a minimum 25% local match (cost share) requirement. The maximum federal share per officer position is $41,666.66 per year over the three-year period, totaling $125,000. Any additional costs for higher than entry-level salaries and fringe benefits will be the responsibility of the recipient agency.

During the first year of the grant there will be initial City expense to purchase uniforms and equipment for the entry-level positions. The Police Department has some of the required equipment (weapon and radio) but will need to pwchase uniforms, duty belt and bullet resistant vest. The approximate cost for each officer is $2,500.00.

In FY 2022-2023 the salary and benefits for each of the three entry level officers will be approximately $165,203of which approximately $41,666.66 per officer will be paid for by the COPS Hiring Program,
In FY 2023-2024 the salary and benefits for each of the three entry level officers will be approximately $173,894 of which approximately $41,666.66 per officer will be paid for by the COPS Hiring Program.
3

Page 279 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.12.

In FY 2024-2025 the salary and benefits for each of the three entry level officers will be approximately $178,436 of which approximately $41,666.66 per officer will be paid for by the COPS Hiring Program.

Over the three-year period the COPS Hiring Program would provide funding, the total for three (3) entry level officers (Full salary & benefits) would be approximately, $1,552,599.

The mar<imum federal grant award ($125,000 cap per Officer over 3 years) is $375,000.

The total cost to the City of Folsom (match amount) is approximately,$1,177,599 At the end of the period of performance, the City of Folsom must maintain the awarded positions for a minimum of 12 months.

This grant also contains a nonsupplanting requirement, which means the grant may only be applied to positions that are not otherwise budgeted and would not be funded.

The City of Folsom will be notified of the award no later than September 30,2022.

ATTACIIMENT
Resolution No. 10872 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Submit an Application for Grant Funds to the United States Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) Hiring Program.

Submitted,
Hillman, Chief of Police
4

Page 280 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.12.

RESOLUTION NO. 10872

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN

APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS TO THE
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF'JUSTICEO COPS HIRING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City qualifies for federal grant funds through the United States Department of Justice, Community Oriented Policing Service (COPS) Hiring Program; and WHEREAS, the COPS Hiring Program will cover up to $125,000 for each of the entry- level police officers hired within the designated award period the salary and fringe benefits for each approved position for a three-year period with a minimum 25Yolocal match requirement; and WHEREAS, the maximum federal share per officer position is $125,000 over the three- year period (not $125,000 per year); and
WHEREAS, the City desires to accept these funds to hire three police officers to add to the Neighborhood Service Division and patrol division to address staffing needs for development south of Highway 50, community oriented policing activities, provide additional resources to those in crisis and to help build trust through transparency within the community and foster positive relationships; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom will comply with state and federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements for application, acceptance and use of federal funds; and NOW, THEREFORE' BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to submit an application for grant funds to the United States Department of Justice, COPS Hiring Program
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June,2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10872
Page I of I Page 281
06/14/2022 Item No.12.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Page 282 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.12.

Folsom City Council
Staff rt
MEETING DATE: 6n412022
AGENDA SECTION: Consent Calendar
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10873 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with BrightView Landscape Services for Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and Folsom Plan Area Landscapes for the City of Folsom and Appropriation of Funds
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 10873 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with BrightView Landscape Services for Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and Folsom Plan Area Landscapes for the City of Folsom and Appropriation of Funds.

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
On March 31,2022, the Parks and Recreation Department advertised on ClPlist.com and the City of Folsom website the availability of two landscape maintenance contracts that will service the City's Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and the Folsom Plan Area Landscaping. The city requested both qualifications and a proposal (RFQ/RFP) from perspective contractors for this bid package.

As part of the city's outreach, staff sent targeted emails to those contractors who over the last years requested to be on our bidder's list to inform them of the availability and details of upcoming contracts, as well as other landscape maintenance firms in our area that could be interested in submitting a proposal and their qualifications. 1

Page 283 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.13.

POLICY / RULE
In accordance with Chapter 2.36.090 (AXl) and 2.36.120 of the Folsom Municipal Code, professional services are not subject to competitive sealed bidding requirements, and those costing $66,141or greater shall be awarded by City Council.

ANALYSIS
The City currently contracts for landscape maintenance in these areas and this contract is a continuation of those services. The overall bid process consisted of the following steps:

Posting of bid package: March 31,2022
Mandatory Pre-Bid meeting: April 13, 2022
RFQ/RFP's Due to City: May 6, 2022 (4:00PM)
Interviews of Qualified Contractors: May 127 13,2022
RFP's of Qualified Contractors Opened: May 16,2022
Notice of Award: May 17,2022
Some of the notable changes to this contract package from the prior contracts was more defined details about the maintenance areas. Staff went district by district creating overlays to calculate exact quantities of areas to be maintained as well as identified the levels of maintenance each area will receive (i.e., Streetscapes, quarterly weed abatement areas, trails, dog stations & trash cans, biofiltration areas, and vegetative swales)
The city received responses to the RFQiRFP package from BrightView, TerraCare, New Image, and JG Landscaping. The evaluation process was comprised of three factors. The first phase was the independent evaluation oftheir request for qualifications by three staff members.

The second was a panel interview consisting of 10 scored questions. The last factor that was taken into account was price. Based on these three criteria we scored and ranked the firms as shown in the table below:

Terracare JG Landscaping New Image BriehtView
RFO SCORE 78 81.83 69 92.5
INTERVIEW SCORE 75.83 78 84 97
COST 22.29 50 1.5 2t.5
TOTAL t76.12 209.83 154.5 2tt
Pursuant to the existing agreement with Terracare, the City has been operating on a month-to- month basis to maintain contract services in the interim until the new contract is adopted. The proposed three-year agreement allows for two, one-year extensions based on successful service and adherence to specifications in the original agreement. The proposed agreement is expected to begin on July 1,2022. Agreement extensions after the three-year base agreement will each be reconsidered for approval by the City Council.
2

Page 284 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.13.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
While this is a professional services agreement, staff will highlight the cost comparisons of the proposals. The yearly maintenance cost as included in each proposal is shown below:

Company Proposal Annual Maintenance Cost
Terracare $2.894.976.00
JG Landscaping $1,290,933.32
New Image 3.s29.607.00
Brightview 2,994,508.68
With Brightview being the highest ranking on the RFQ and interview process, staff proceeded to discuss the proposed yearly maintenance cost with them as there was a significant increase over the estimated budgets. Recognizing the estimated budgets were based on current costs for service which were established over three years ago, staff expected costs to increase but wanted to ensure the scope of work and available funding were in alignment. Staff reviewed current levels of service and the proposed scope of services for all the maintenance areas (streetscapes, open space, turf, weed abatement, etc.) and determined that there could be savings achieved with some modified scope requirements without reducing the overall quality of service and city expectations. Staff proposed several scope adjustments in such areas as less visible slope or landscape areas as well as modified maintenance frequencies for less dense open space areas. No modifications to scope were made to the areas of highest visibility, public safety, fire safety, general weed control, etc.

As a result of some modifications to the scope of work, Brightview tailored their proposed maintenance costs which resulted in a revised yearly cost (that would not be adjusted for the first three years) to $1,987,666.23. This is the amount being proposed for the new agreement.

In addition, this agreement allows for unscheduled services in FY 2022-23 such as plant replacements, fence repairs, irrigation repairs, etc., in the amount, not to exceed, $430,000. All unscheduled work is approved by the Landscape Services Manager prior to work beginning and contractor is not entitled to such funds unless authorized by the City.

In reviewing each district's fund balance, adequate funding is available in all of the districts however, new allocations will be needed in twenty-two of the thirty districts. The baseline amount already proposed in the existing budget is $1,513,115.95. The amount that is needed to augment the baseline budget is $474,550.28. The total contract amount would then be 1,987,666,23. The other eight districts (Prairie Oaks Ranch, Prairie Oaks Ranch No.2, American River Canyon North No. 3, The Islands at Parkshore, Folsom Heights, Folsom Heights No. 2, Folsom Plan Area CFD 19, Folsom Plan Area CFD 23) have adequate funds already budgeted. As such, additional funds will need to be appropriated in the FY 2022-23 L&L and CFD budgets. Districts requiring appropriations are outlined in the table provided below:

J Page 285
06/14/2022 Item No.13.

District Fund Number (sl New Cost Estimated Budgets New Allocation Oriqinal Budset Total New BudPetTotal ARC North #2 267 s 10s.094.58 s 56.500.00 S 48.s94.s8 s 139.2s5.00 s 187.8s0.s8 Blue Ravine Oaks 250,278 s 22.080.06 S 17,soo.oo S 4.s8o.o6 s 19.397.00 s 23.977.06 Broadstone #3 266 s 390.sss.61 S 2zs,ooo.oo s 165.555.51 s 1.244.240.OO S 1.409.795.61 Broadstone 1.2. & 4 2r0,282 s 291,404.10 S 18o,ooo.oo s 111.404.10 s 255.161.00 s 355.565.10 Cobble Hills Ridee ll 2L4 s 2s.218.38 s 20,000.00 S s.218.38 s s4.046.00 s s9.254.38 Natoma Station 207 S 101,443.35 s 95.000.00 s 6.443.35 s 24r.L74.OO s 247.617.36 Willow Creek Estates South 252 5 76,442.54 s 25.000.00 E sr.442.s4 s 256.790.00 s 3r8.232.s4 Willow Sorinqs 262 s 89.488.17 s 58.0s0.00 E 2r.43a.fl s 777.750.OO s 199.188.17 Briass Ranch 205 s 66,042.9s s 4s.000.00 E 2r.o42ss s toz.612.oo s 123.5s4.9s Cobble Ridse 234 S 8,185.57 s 7.s00.00 s 586.57 s 77.592.OO s L8.278.67 Folsom Plan Area- (CFD 18) 288 5 304,082,11 s 300.000.00 s 4.082.11 s 901.369.00 s 905.451.11 Hannaford Cross 212 S 15,951.76 S 11.5oo.oo s 5.467.75 s 28.438.00 s 33.899.75 Lake Natoma Shores/Preserve 2L3 s 77,637.84 s 7.000.00 s 10.637.84 s 23.r73.OO s 33.810.84 Los Cerros 204 s 27,64t.70 s 26.500.00 s 7.74r.70 s 91.532.00 s 92.773.70 Natoma Vallevfi he Knolls 232 s 39,8s6.36 s 39.000.00 s 855.35 s 57.500.00 s s8.355.35 Prosoect Ridse 285 s 74,669.94 s 8.000.00 s 5.669.94 s 27.759.OO s 34.438.94 Sierra Estates 23r S 8,s32.70 s 4.s00.00 s 4-032.70 s 77.445.OO s 21.477.70 Silverbrook 237 S 5,380.44 s 3.155.00 s 3.225.44 s 70.770.OO s 13.99s.44 Steeolechase 25r S 14.300.28 S 14.ooo.oo s 300.28 s 45.355.00 s 46.566.28 The Residences at ARC/ ARC 2 27r S 14.90s.05 s 14.000.00 s 90s.05 s 31_866.00 s 32.77r.06 Willow Creek Estates East 249,284 s ss,830.68 S ss,ooo.oo S 830.68 s 28.481.00 s 29.311.58 Total s 474,ss0.28 s 3,782,827.00 s 4.2s7.t77.28
For additional information about each districts total budget that includes all costs beyond the landscape maintenance contracts such as utilities cost, streetlight maintenance, irrigation maintenance, planned projects, etc., the two last columns of the table show what is reflected in this yearly engineers report that is approved by City Council annually.

ATTACHMENT
Resolution No. 10873 - A Resolution Authorizing the City Manager to Execute an Agreement with BrightView Landscape Services for Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and Folsom Plan Area Landscapes for the City of Folsom and Appropriation of Funds
Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione,
Parks & Recreation Director
4

Page 286 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.13.

RESOLUTION NO. 10873

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AGREEMENT WITH BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES FOR LANDSCAPING

AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS, COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS, AND

F'OLSOM PLAN AREA LANDSCAPES FOR THE CITY OF FOLSOM AND

APPROPRIATION OF' FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom desires to enter into a professional services agreement for an initial period beginning July 1, 2022through June 30,2025, for landscape maintenance services in the City of Folsom Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and the Folsom Plan Area Landscapes; and
WHEREAS, the City of Folsom can, at its discretion based on successful completion of the initial agreement, extend the contract for up to two additional one-year extensions; and WHEREAS, proposals were solicited in accordance with Folsom Municipal Code Section

2.36.100 and advertised on March 31,2022; and
WHEREAS, BrightView Landscape Services was the most qualified contractor; and WHEREAS' funds are available in the respective districts current fund balance and budgeted in the FY 2022-23 budget; and
WHEREAS, additional funds required to be allocated are available in each respective district fund balance, and
WHEREAS, the agreement will be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement with BrightView Landscape Services for landscape maintenance in Landscaping and Lighting Districts, Community Facilities Districts, and Folsom PlanAreaLandscapes inthe amount of $1,987,666.23 for scheduled services and $430,000 for unscheduled services for FY 2022-23.

NOW' THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is authorized to appropriate to each fund the amount listed on the attachment showing the appropriation amount as well as the total fund adjusted budget for FY 2022-23.

PASSED AND ADOPTED this l4th day of June 2022by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Resolution No. 10873
Page I of3 Page 287
06/14/2022 Item No.13.

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10873
Page2 of3 Page 288
06/14/2022 Item No.13.

Attachment
District Fund Number (s) New Cost Estimated Budgets New Allocation Orieinal Budset Total New Budset Total ARC North #2 267 S r.os.094.58 S s6,soo.oo s 48,594.58 s 139,256.00 s L87,850.58 Blue Ravine Oaks 250,278 s 22.080.06 S 17.soo.oo s 4,580.06 s 19,397.00 5 23,977.06 Broadstone #3 266 S 390,ss5.61 s 22s.000.00 s r.6s,s55.61 S t.244.240.o0 s 1,409,79s.61 Broadstone L, 2, & 4 2L0,282 s 291,404.10 S 18o,ooo.oo S r.i.1,404.10 s 255.151.00 s 356,s6s.10 Cobble Hills Ridee ll 2L4 s 25.218.38 s 20.000.00 S 5,218.38 s 54,045.00 s s9,264.38 Natoma Station 207 S 10i..443.36 S gs.ooo.oo s 6,443.36 S , 24L,174.O0 S 247,617.36 Willow Creek Estates South 252 5 76,442.54 s 2s.000.00 s 5L.442.54 s 266,790.O0 S 318,232.54 Willow Sorinss 262 s 89,488.17 s 68,0s0.00 s 2t,438.L7 s L77,750.00 S 199,188.17 Briggs Ranch 205 s 66,042.95 S 4s,ooo.oo S 2r,042.9s s to2,6t2.00 s 123,6s4.9s Cobble Ridee 234 s 8.186.67 s 7,500.00 S oso.oz s t7,s92.00 S L8,278.67 Folsom Plan Area- (CFD 18) 288 s 304,082.11 s 300,000.00 S 4,082.11 s 901,369.00 S 90s,451.11 Hannaford Cross 2L2 S 16,961.76 s 11,s00.00 S s,qatte s 28.438.00 s 33.899.76 Lake Natoma Shores/Preserve 213 s L7,637.84 s 7,000.00 S t0,637.94 s 23,L73.00 S 33,810.84 Los Cerros 204 S z7.64L.7o s 26,500.00 S 1..L4L.70 s 91,632.00 S 92,773.70 Natoma Vallev/The Knolls 232 s 39,8s6.36 s 39.000.00 s 8s6.36 s s7.500.00 S s8,356.36 Prosoect Ridse 285 s 14,669.94 s 8,000.00 s 5,569.94 s 27.769.00 s 34.438.94 Sierra Estates 231 s 8,532.70 s 4,500.00 S 4,032.70 s t7,445.00 S zt,qtz.to Silverbrook 237 s 6,380.44 s 3.1s5.00 s 3.225.44 s t0,770.00 S 13,995.44 Steeolechase 25L S 14,300.28 S 14,ooo.oo s 300.28 s 46,366.00 s 46,666,28 The Residences at ARC/ ARC 2 27L s r.4.905.06 S 14,ooo.oo S gos.oo s 31,866.00 5 32,77L.06 Willow Creek Estates East 249,284 s ss,830.68 s 55,000.00 s 830.68 s 28,481.00 S 29,311.68 Total S 474.ss0.28 s 3.782.827.00 S 4,257,377.28
Resolution No. 10873

Page 3 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.13.

This page is intentionally trefr blank.

Page 290 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.13.
fi :!!r.r1:,1 tt t:;a1 tl
Folsom City Council
Staff ort

RECOMMENDATION / CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council pass and adopt Resolution No. 10861 - A Resolution Adopting the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Operating and Capital Budgets for the City of Folsom, the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, and the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority.

BACKGRO / ISSIIE
In February and March 2022, a discussion was held with the City Council to provide information regarding the five-year forecast and the challenges in future years. Direction provided by the City Council at these three meetings provided the framework for staff to begin the preparation of the FY 2022-23 Budget. The City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Preliminary Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) was presented to the City Council on May 10,2022. Staff reviewed the different components of the proposed budget, highlighted the various proposed projects, and answered questions by Council Members. A public hearing was held on May 24, 2022, during which staff was asked to provide some additional information. The public hearing on May 24,2022 was continued to June 14,2022 to provide time for staff to provide the requested additional information.

POLICY / RULE
Folsom Municipal Code. Section 3.02.030. Budget
1 MEETING DATE: 6tr412022
AGENDA SECTION: Public Hearing
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10861 - A Resolution Adopting the City Manager's Fiscal Year2022-23 Operating and Capital Budgets for the City of Folsom, the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, and the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority FROM: Finance Department

Page 291 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.
"An Annual Budget shall be prepared by the City Manager, with the assistance of the Finance Director. . . . (G) The City Council shall adopt the annual budget by Resolution by fund and program by affirmative vote of at least three members, on or before the last working day of the iast month of the current fiscal year. If the City Council fails to adopt the budget by the last working day of the current fiscal year, the budget as presented by the City Manager shall be deemed adopted."

ANALYSIS
The FY 2022-23 Operating Budget as presented totaled $248,593,092. Below is a breakdown by Fund category:

The FY 2022-23 Operating Budget and CIP also includes 479.25 full and permanent part time positions across all funds. A total of 18 new positions have been added in this budget. The added positions are listed below along with the department.

Department Position
Fire Department
Parks & Recreation*
Police Department
Police Department
Police Department
Solid Waste
Water
Water
Wastewater
Wastewater
Firefighters (10)
Maintenance Worker
Police Officer
Dispatcher
Animal Control Officer
Refuse Driver
Water Utilrty Worker
Administrative Technician (. 50)
Revenue Technician
Administrative Technician (. 50)
*The Parks and Recreation position is funded by L&L and Maintenance Districts The proposed Operating and CIP Budgets are available on the City's web site at https ://www. folsom.ca.us/govemment/fi nance/citv-budget.

During the public hearing on June 14,2022 staff will report back to the council on the requested information. If the council decides to accept the budget as presented it can be adopted. If 2 $248 ,092
FY?3 Propos_ed Amg-ugt
s102,422,714
Debt Service Funds
Capital Project Funds
Internal Service Funds
Funds
Revenue Funds
C._?tq.gotyFund
1 General Fund
Fiduciary Fuqds.

Total
s52,475,276
s13,724,606
s29,048,244
s21,680,299

Page 292 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.
based on the requested information the Council would like to make changes to the presented budget staff will make the requested changes and return on June 28, 2022 with the updated documents for the Council to approve.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10861 - A Resolution adopting the City Manager's Fiscal Year 2022- 23 Operuting and Capital Budgets for the City of Folsom, the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority, and the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority

2. Summary of Revenues, pages II-26 through II-31

3. Summary of Appropriations, pages II-34 through II-39

4. Staffing Detail, pages VII-14 through VII'22
Submitted,
I
Tamagni, Finance Director
J Page 293
06/14/2022 Item No.14.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 294 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

RESOLUTION NO. 10861
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY MANAGER'S F'ISCAL YEAR 2022.23

OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS FOR THE CITY OF F'OLSOM, THE

SUCCESSOR AGENCY, THE F'OLSOM PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY' AND

THE FOLSOM RANCH FINANCING AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, section 3.02.030 of the Folsom Municipal Code states o'An Annual Budget shall be prepared by the City Manager, with the assistance of the Finance Director ...."; and WHEREAS' onthe l0thday of May 2022,the City Managerpresentedto the City Council the FY 2022-23 Preliminary Operating Budget and Capital lmprovement Plan; and WHEREAS, the Preliminary Budget includes the budget recommendations of each office and department of the City, including the FY 2022-23 Preliminary Budget for the Successor Agency, the Folsom Public Financing Authority and the Folsom Ranch Financing Authority as well as the FY 2022-23 Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Preliminary Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is on file and available for inspection on the City website; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary Operating Budget, CIP, and all components thereof on May 10, 2022,May 24,2022 ar]d June 14, 2022; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Folsom that the sgmmary of revenues, summary of appropriations by fund and staffing levels as attached to this resolution, are hereby appropriated to the departments' offices and operations in the amounts and for the objects and purposes therein stated. pASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of June 2022, by the following roll-call vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Councilmember(s):

Keni M. Howell, MAYOR
ATTEST:

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10861
Page I of I Page 295
06/14/2022 Item No.14.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 296 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

City of Folsom FY 2022-23 Budget
GneralFund $$$$
$$$ $Conanunity Developnrnt Block Crant $
Transpofi ation Sys temManagenrnt
FolsomArts & C\rlture Comnission
Housing Trust
Humbug WillowCreek
Crneral Plan
Tree Planting & Replacennnt
ft nrnunity Affordable Housing
ParkDodication
Planning Services
Local Transportation Tax
Historical District
Cas Tax- Road Maint & Repait
Cas Tax2l06
Cas Tax2107
Cns Tax2107.5
Cas Tax2l05
MeasureA
Traffic Congestion Rslief
lns Cenos L&L
Briggs Ranch L& L
NatonnStationL&L
FolsomHeights L&L
BroadstoneUnit3L&L
Broadstone L&L
I{annaford Crcss L&L
lake Natonu Shores L & L
Cobble Hils/Reflections L& L
Prairie Oaks RanchL &L#2
SienaBtatesL&L
NatonnValleyL&L
Cobble Ridge L& L
Prairie Oaks Ranch L & L
SilverbrookL & L
WillowOeekhstL&L
Blue Ravine Oaks L & L
Steeplechase L& L
WillowCreekSouthL&L
Anprican River Canyon North L & L
WillowSprings L&L
Willow Springs CFD l1 Mtn. Dist.

CFD#12Mtn. Dist.

CFD#13ARCMtn.Dst.

ARCNorth L&LDist. #2
The Residences at ARC, North L & L
Folsom Plan Area-Sphere of Influence
Oah at WillowSprings
ARCNorth L& LDist. #3
$ $ 220,000
80,000
1,876,069
346,585
n5,440
818,102
531,007
2,966,W3
I) rrlt.,j,illl
'lIl|
ilitlir, illr llirr'
I i;ti, ,
iij rrrrt:.r'lrrt,
ai,ira'llir iritr\i
illr :ril r\,trtr,
'l: lrr!.1i,)r
iii,r;rrir jiii.r,t
i!i,i,).
. ii'1,;
'1.,
" ',
r
I l:',1,r rlt ii,,
ii,I! J"ir lr\ii
I llr\'.,t rlt t, r.l
ii\rtrtiir
;ri i 1 (i:y,ir;11r 1L;1 i\r t r ti,1
tt-26Page 297
06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Summnry of Revenues by Fund
Charges
for Senices
Iines &
Forfeitures
Interest
Rswnue
Transfers
h
Ile of
llmdBalanceMsc Tohl
$ 11,111,946 $ 120,300 $ 230,000 $ 584,567 $ 8,312,192 $ $ 102,422,714 Cieneral
GneralFund
$ 11.111,946 $ 120,300 $ 230,000 $ 584,567 $ 8J12,192 $ $ rx2422,7r4 Suhotal Gbneral Spcial Rerrnue
$
35,000
50,000
89,610
100,000
175,000
250,000
300,000
600
41,200
81,000
174,500
21,9s0
23,200
388,500
20,000
21,100
43,800
3r8,950
8,900
68,200
13,600
195,600
60,100
36y'00
24,000
161,500
104,200
14200
1 1 5,800
604,000
107,200
12,200
21,100
500
1,200
400
8,000
1,500
8,000
150,000
15,000
5,000
1,500
100
6,000
8,000
6,000
7,500
6,000
15,000
1,200
1,000
500
250
3,000
1,000
1,000
r,ooo
700
6,500
500
500
3,000
19,000
900
1,800
1,000
1,000
300
13,000
600) $
(r,03t
37,600
93,753
(88,744)
48,726
139,286
2s,829
(10,61)
60,624
(45,500)
4,342
1 13,680
(106,07r)
Q28,721)
(38e,637)
15,795
(568,978)
49,232
21,612
66,674
21,087
) \61
(133,339)
8,438
1,073
10,246
(38,700)
8,29s
(13,700)
2,992
(s2,6t2)
9,710
(31,619)
08,003)
21,666
98,790
46,278
525
58,950
a\240
31,r56
18,174
9,766
(1,000)
(300)
135,889
220,000
35,1 65
40,000
151,753
866
150,226
322,286
465,829
4,187
,65,624
36,000
5,042
1,995,7 49
248,514
502,719
435,965
552,802
2,412,025
91,632
102,612
241,17 4
43,337
26,067
255,161
28,438
23,17t
54,046
280,750
l7,445
57,500
l7,592
l42,ggg
10,770
28,481
19,197
46,t66
266,790
150,978
15,225
177,750
1,244240
119,256
t2,174
31,866
$ $ $ Community Development Block Grant
Transportation System Management
FolsomArts & C\lture Commission
Housing Trust
Humbug Willow Creek
GneralPlan
Tree Planting & Replacement
Community Affordable Housin g
ParkDedication
Planning Services
l.ocal Transportation Tax
Historical District
Cus Tax- Road Maint & Repair
&s Tax2106
Cns Tax2107
&s Tax210i.5
&s Tax2105
Measure A
Traffic C,ongestion Relief
Lns Cenos L&L
BriggsRanchL&L
NatomaStationL&L
FolsomHeights L&L
Broadstone Unit 3 L&L
Broadstone L & L
Hannaford Cross L&L
Lake Natoma Shores L & L
ftbble Hilh/Reflections L & L
Pmirie Oals Ranch L& L
SienaEstatesL&L
NatornaValleyL&L
ftbbleRidgeL&L
Prairie 0als Ranch L & L
Silverbrook L & L
WrllowCreekhst L& L
Blue Ravine 0als L & L
Steeplechase L & L
Willow Creek South L & L
American RiverCanyon North L& L
WillowSpringsL&L
Willow Springs CFD I I Mtn. Dist,
CFD#l2Mtn. Dst.

CFD#13 ARCMtn. Dst.

ARCNofth L& LDist. #2
The Residences at ARC,North L& L
Folsom Plan Area-Sphere of Influence
Oala at Willow Springs
ARCNorth L&LDist. #3
2,000
40,000
,o
300
246,500
tt-27
395,389

Page 298 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

City of Folsom FY 2022-23 Badget
Blue Ravine Oaks No. 2 L & L
FolsomHeights #2L&L
Broadstone #4
CFD # 16 The Islands
Willow Creek Btate &st L & L Dst
ProspectRidgeL&LDst
CFD#lSMaintDist
CFD#19MaintDist
CFD#23 Al Maint Dist
CFD #23 A2 Maint Dist
Police Special Revenue
Zoo SpecialRevenue
Wetland Maintenance
CCT kbt Service
G0 School Facilities Bonds DS
Folsom South AD Refunding
1982-l Ninfius AD
Traffic SignalRetunding
Recreation Facilify COP DS
Folsom Public Financing Authority
FolsomRanch
Supplenrntal ParkFee
Parklnprovennnt
Johnny Cash TrailArt
Zoo Capital Projects
Police Capital
Cbntral FolsomArea Capital Projects
Fire Apital
CrneralCapital
Transportation hproverrnt
Drainage Capital
Light Rail Transportation
Crneral Park fr uipnnnt Capital
Waterlnpact
library Developrnnt
FolsomPlan Area Infrastructurc
FolsomPlan Ana Transit Capital
FolsomPlan Area Corp Yard Capital
FolsomPlan Area Hway 50 Ilrp
FolsomPlan Area Hwy 50 Intch.

Folsom Plan Area Capital
Major Capital and Renovation
Prairie Oak l9l5AD
CFD #10 Russell Ranch
ii: 'rlr: r ir',
i,r
' l; il irlli ,i". r'-.ll r- i '|itttLtlri
li1,t ir rr't,'rl
il: t:tll,irir:
i,ri:irri.i (ij
ril it:t
'
l; i 1., l
r iIlr1. r
iIrt l:lrt;r.,'t
lirtltriffl
lrii 1,'i rlif
'iir'.1 rlr trr:lli\rirtii,
!tht,tliillrli.

I ;liitrji,irl,.llirrrtiit
250,000
CFD l
II.28

Page 299 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Summary of Revenues by Fund
(('jit t,j,.i,:r.
lirt,'l:ll,t irii,ltr;
'itl r t,l: I,l
riirtrji,liiirl 1,,;:
iri i ),lrrrtr
liltlrrlr(l
'l 1,,"r r ti arl,rt.
:ri
I ;. i|1r1
.ir trri I lt' ' li'rtilii{ l:iL.

I'j ilil{lii'l,ilr iill. i: i,' 'i;1li:, I itl. i,, I,. ;rlr.i|irll lii ilr\!r)rlrtriiirl l,'i:ji,: ll:r,,it,j, tiiirrli
l;i irr;,iirili;irri, :,i, i! ii;iillirl :: r,,il.,,rr.i:riliri,,l;',:, iii,:l'1','r:llri :lj rtl:iri;,1 1l ii. l-i1r1:,1'(,)llirrr(i 56,443
71,489
363,446
135,651
147,261
27 J69
901,369
79J38
45,890
3,500
5,288
570
643
19,343
638e
nwA6
66,84e)
74,061
(2,53r)
150,369
(80262)
(4,110)
0,500)
(50,712)
(31,930)
(1,000)
(5,000)
35,600
a,600
%2W
188,000
72,00fr
30,000
745,000
154,000
50,000
5,000
50,000
22,4_W
1,500
2,500
1,000
4500
1,200
300
6,000
oTo
6,000
500
1,000
5,000
1,000
50,000
800
9,000
1r00
2,000
8,000
15,000
8,000
10,000
2,000
100
125
15,000
5,000
15,000
50,000
200,000
900
4,500
Blue Ravine 0als No. 2 L & L
FolsomHeights #2L&L
Broadstone #4
CTD #16 The Islands
Willow GeekBtate East L & LDst
hospectRidgeL&LDst
CFD #18 Maint dist
CFD #19 Maint dist
CFD#23 Al MaintDst
CFD#23 42Maint Dst
Police Special Revenue
Zoo Special Revenue
Wetland
CCFDebt Service
G0 School Facilities Bonds DS
Folson South AD Refu nding
1982-lNimbus AD
Traffic SignalRefunding
Recreation Facility COP DS
Folsom Public Financing Authority
FolsomRanch
Supplemental Park Fee
Parkhnprovement
Johnny Cash Trail Art
Zoo &pitalhojects
Police Capital
Central Folsom Area Capital hojgcts
Fhe Capital
ftneral Capital
Transportation hprcvement
Drainage Capital
Light Rail Transpoft ation
Crneral Park Equipment Capital
WatetlnPact
Library Development
Folsom Plan Area Infrastructure
FolsomPlan Area Transit &pital
FolsomPlan Area Cbrp Yard Capital
FolsomPlan Area Hwy 50Imp
FolsomPlan Area Hwy 50lntch
Fols om Plan Area Cbpital
Major Capital and Renovation
Pmide Oak 1915 AD
CFD #10 RussellRanch
10,000
15,000
Q,A\025) 5,471,8316,992,856
2477,995
350J15
9,000
133248
(5,800)
Q51p72)
0,003)
(406510)
(828,753)
1,627,5%
162,605
(98,871
1144t4
1,632$70
10,000
2fi6t;1,4t
10,000
2,641
197
n6;],40
I,187
4,586,851
104,660
167,595
196,414
2,og4,g7o
25,000
50,688
50,000
100,000
18,199,980
50,000
676
540,750
82t940
2,%4255
534,055
256,470
80,000
212,\W
1n7,540
905,000
1,188,370
21t7,075
11,021,045
02t
(1217,540)
(859,312)
(1,153J70)
Q367975)
6yt8935
49,100
l
1T.29
0,824)
cFD#14

Page 300 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom FY2022-23 Budget
ilttrii rr
'llrii:;:tr,illrrlit'[rtii,
l' r11, I ''
,,
':
f:ljjl.r:j ;! 'r r' l : , t : l i l r t !
, l r : l
, itltl!:rlji i,
ii t l ,,r,"t,
I 'rrl:-i't
jl ,: I rl l,i trt
.i,r1 l:
'i'l lll: r,jl
iirr ill i.ii:
irll l 'ri ;11':
:
iiilrllrirl:1,
liriirjrrrtriiilirl \iirir llilrlii
lii, rr,jtrlrr) liirtrri::

Tmnsit
Water
WaterCapital
WaterMeters
Wastewater
Wastewater Capital
CriticalAugmentation
Crneral Augmentation
Solid Waste
Solid Waste Capital
landfill Closure
Solid lVaste Plan Area
Capital Replacement
RjskManagement
Leaves
Assessment & CFD Agency Funds $
Redevelopment Prop Tax Trust
Redevelopnent SA Trust -Housing
FolsomPlan Area Plan Fee
$$ $$$ $
120/15
$$
3,6n222
$$$
Ir-30

Page 301 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Summary of Revenaes by Fund
$
18,954,500
491,505
n5,w
10,985,200
60,000
20,397,000
125,000
19,129,018
$ 15,494,79 $
Q476,676)
Q04,60q
(58,450)
(1,223,669)
26,471
(1e0
88,518
2,379,499
(43,093)
16,822,824
326,899
228,550
9,911,531
92,471
54 89,118
23,426,914
E5,907
100,000
494i14
20,535,985
14,772J,09
3,741850
$ $ $ $$
100,000
43 494,314
1,375,%7
$ 91,207 $ (911,150) $
- tr4J28
- (1,000)
Transit
Water
WaterCapital
WaterMeten
Wastewater
Wastewater Capital
Critical Augmentation
&neral Augnrntation
Solid Waste
Solid Waste Capital
landfill Closure
Solid Waste Plan Area
Capital Replacenrnt
RiskManagement
kaves
Assessnrnt & CFD Agency Funds
Redevelopment hop TaxTrust
Redevelopnent SA Trust - Housing
FolsomPlan Area Plan Fee
$
145,000
40,000
12,000
150,000
6 000
?50
600
70,000
4,000
200,000
470,000
30,000
%500 $
1,000
1,000
200
$
i1 lirtrr:,1,i;,
iiiii l:il\it'j.ll
iittrt,tr'!l,r
I tirt,iijfirt,r,tr;
;irii.t'i,lrr i
lit\lljrlr( l;!lljri' :1ri: 1rtti.,
: 'rlrlirl ) rii
'ii':1,'
r r,1i,1 rt lilrl llrl
i ! 'ij i,l:iilllj,i,l{ll :,j :.1, 't l;j,;.,:1.i1) l,'l ,1 :,ij ,illl;fllii, i,, il r l, \lj,i';il ,\ ',j'l:::'i,r:i'irr i:.ll il i,l;,ti ir .ll:r,liilIrir I i rt i,r,i rlrl i i,i,t,it i'1,;. iir i r tl I
i', :illll(irir'rrillir i' It:r ,i1li:'riil' ,rl ..rtitlt: : .,])lj tiiil ,. ,1. i. I ,,ll{il.,r'lri litii.trjll riLti.t'rrr,ll, r,t rli,lr l;trt litri rt,jtri 'jirriilr
\': i;l,\i'l)i:i:)i.i:) ,,, lli ,iri ' i"r ;,,iit.. r
l:l tii'iri;ri ,llii rlirt
"iirt: rt:i irtrrii rrt ii ,iirtr t,li
II.31

Page 302 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 303 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom FY2022-23 Badget
I i i, i ril,r i i ( i, i' 1 i l' rr i I I I I I irir t r I ri l.;r t),:'),) .jil ' , .r.rl.,it ii:'rrlr ri)i ,i 1 t\.:,', i.tt:,:li; :'r.ir:lill,l rii;r t ,i::,,,i,,"i:lrljiji'
rl,.,t;::il i i\l!rlilrt
, i:Ji:1'r rl)ii i."
lll ri:rr; ,.:r,:'
i j,l t:l
,:,.r r
'l'1,;
.,;;
:lli,trli:i l,'i,,r'^ rrr:Iir I i\.1Iifii.':

Crneral Fund $$$
$$
110
C-omnnrnity Developnrent Block Gant
Traffrc System Manag ernent
FolsomArts & Culture C.ommission
Housing Trust
Humbug WillowCreek
Ceneral Plan
Tree Planting & Replacement
C-omnmn ity A ffordab le Hous ing
ParkDedication
Planning Services
Local Transportation Tax
Historical District
Css Tax- Road Maint & Repair
Gas Tax2106
Cl,sTax2l0T
Cas Tax2107.5
Css Tax2l05
Measure A
Traffrc C.on ges tion Relief
Los Ceros L& L
Briggs Ranch L& L
Natorm Station L&L
FolsomHeights L& L
Broadstone Unit 3 L& L
Broadstone L& L
Hannaford Cross L& L
lake Natonra Shores L & L
Cobble Hills/Reflections L& L
Prairie Oaks Ranch L & L#2
SierraEstates L&L
Natonu Valley L& L
C,obble Ridge L& L
Prairie Oaks Ranch L& L
SilverbrookL& L
Willow Creek East L & L
Blue Favine Oaks L& L
Steeplechase L & L
WillowCreek South L& L
American River Canyon North L & L
WillowSprings L&L
Willow Springs CFD 11Mtn. Dist.

CFD#12Mtn. Dist.

CFD#13 ARCMtn. Dist.

ARCNorth L&LDtst.#2
The xe-s idences at ARC, North L & L
Fols om Plan Area-Sphere of Influence
Oaks at Willow Springs
ARCNorth L& LDist. #3
$ 220,W0
35,000
40,000
150,000
150,000
300,000
350,300
350,000
36,000
5,000
4Vt,M9
84,150
85,250
201,250
42,900
25,250
L93,250
22,000
18,200
42,100
275,750
14,525
47,375
L4,650
80,750
7,755
2,6,750
18,450
39,950
255,750
147,250
14,750
159,550
1,t69,700
I 16,000
31,750
2s,700
$
1T.34
374,350

Page 304 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Sammnry of Appropriations by Fund
714
22O,0O0
35,165
40,000
151,753
866
15o,226
322,286
465,829
4387
365,624
36,000
5,042
1,995,749
248,514
502,719
435,965
552,802
2,412,025
91,632
102,612
241,174
43,337
26,067
255,161
29,438
23,173
54,O46
28O,750
17,445
57,500
17,592
142,988
1o,770
28,481
19,397
46,366
266,790
150,978
15,225
177,750
1244,240
139,256
32,174
31,866
General Fund
165
Cornrnunity Development Block Crant
Traffic System Management
FolsomArts & Culture Commission
Housing Trust
Humbug Willow Creek
Crneral Plan
Tree Planting & Replacement
Community Afordab le Hous ing
Park Dedication
Planning Services
Local Transportation Tax
Historical District
Gas Tax- Road Maint & Repair
Cas Tax2l06
Cas Tax2107
Cl,sTax2l07.5
Cas Tax2l05
Measure A
Traffic Congestion Relief
Los Crrros L& L
Briggs Ranch L& L
Natoma Station L& L
FolsomHeights L&L
Broadstone Unit 3 L& L
Broadstone L & L
Hannaford Cross L& L
Iake Natoma Shores L& L
Cobble Hills/Reflections L& L
Prairie Oaks Ranch L & L #2
SienaEstatesL&L
Natoma Valley L& L
Cobble Ridge L& L
Prairie Oaks Ranch L & L
SilverbrookL& L
Willow Creek East L & L
Blue Ravine Oaks L& L
Steeplechase L& L
Willow Creek South L & L
American River Canyon North L & L
WillowSprings L&L
Willow Springs CFD 11 Mtn. Dist.

CFD #12Mtn. Dist.

CFD#13 ARCMtn. Dist.

ARCNorth L&LDist.#2
The Residences at ARC, North L & L
Folsom Plan Area-Sphere of Influence
Oaks at Willow Springs
ARCNorth L&LDist.#3
1,571,680
200,000
1,500"000
42 24,8,514
s02,719
435,965
352,802
9t2,025
1,753
866
2?5
22,286
115,529
4,387
15,624
7,482
t7,362
39,924
437
817
6t,9rt
6,438
4,973
tt,946
5,000
2,920
10,t25
2,942
62,238
3,015
1,731
947
6,416
11,040
3,728
475
18,200
74,540
23,256
424
6,166
21,039
II.35
395,389

Page 305 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom FY2022-23 Budget
i;:r', ::i ,.tlr|t,tr.
r;rlljl i:;,1;1,:1r
: lr:: r'1,,r i
I,i-l,lli r.illrl':lli\rlrtii.r :,rii'!.rrr;.';
ir;. j p, 1..j,1; :1i1l,rr1 i iri11 1 11 l;,
;tlr iiill ,liirrit irt; Iiirlrtjl;:
l)rlillI illliti i :i 1t1p ir,ri I I i 1,ir11,1"r,, Iiil i r i,'r: .::, ,!' lilijl i'i r i ,':1,'i Blue Ravine Oaks L& LDist.#2
FolsomHeights L& LDist. #2
Broadstone #4
CFD #16 The Islands
Willow Cleek Estates Fast L & L Dist
ProspectRidgeL&LDist
CFD #18 Maint Dist
CFD #19 Maint Dist
CFD#23 Al MaintDist
Cf,.D#23 A2MaintDist
Police Special Revenue
Zoo Special revenue
Wetland Maintenance
CCF Debt Service
GO SchoolFacilities Bonds DS
Folsom South AD Refunding
1982-l Nimbus AD
Traffrc SignalRefunding
Recreation Facility COP DS
Fols om Public Financing Authority
FolsomRanch
Supplemental Park Fee
Park Inprovement
Johnny Cash Trail Art
Zoo CapitalProjects
Police Capital
Central Folsom Area Capital Projects
Fire Capital
Ccneral Capital
Trans portation krprovement
Drainage Capital
Light Rail Trans portation
C-rneral Park Equipment Cap ital
Water Inpact
Library Development
Fols om Plan Area Infrastructure
FolsomPlan Area Transit Capital
FolsomPlan Area Corp Yard Capital
FolsomPlan Area Hwy 50 Inprovement
FolsomPlan Area Hwy 50 Interchange
Fols om Plan Area Capital
Major Capital and Renovation
Prairie Oak 1915 AD
CFD #10 Russell Ranch
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
34000 2,60t
49,550
64,025
348,250
1 18,600
130,750
20,525
707,500
76,500
29,500
3,500
126,335
10,000
7s,000
100,000
15,000
60,000
155,000
25,000
50,000
50,000
100,000
366,060
50,000
CFD#14 tr
u-36
1,535,000

Page 306 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Summary of Appropriations by Fund
Deh Service
Cafitat Transfers
Out
$3' 71.680 $ 3F08,752 s 13.724,606
$
91,207 5,471,831
5255,863
Bfue Ravine Oaks L& LDist.#2
FolsomHeights L & L Dist. #2
Broadstone #4
CFD #16 The Islands
Willow Creek Estates East L & L Dist
Prospect Ridge L& LDist
CFD # 18 Maint Dist
CFD # 19 Maint Dist
CnD#23 Al Maint Dist
CED#23 .A2Maint Dist
Police Special Revenue
Zoo Special Revenue
Wetland Open Space Maintenance
Suhotal Special Rerrcnue
Debt Service
CCF Debt Service
GO School Facilities Bonds DS
Folsom South AD Refunding
1982-l Nimbus AD
Traffrc Signal Refunding
Recreation Facility COP DS
Fols om Public Financing Authority
Folsom Ranch Financing Authority
Suhotal Debt Service Fhnds
Ca$tal Project Funds
Supplemental Park Fee
Park IrrProvement
Johnny Cash Trail An
Zoo Capital Projects
Police Capital
Central Folsom Area Capital Projects
Fire Capital
General Capital
Tran s p ortation InproEfi:l
Light Rail Trans portation
Crneral Park Equipment Capital
Water Impact
Library DeveloPment
Folsom Plan Area Inllastructure
FolsomPlan Area Transit Capital
FolsomPlan Area Corp Yard Capital
FolsomPlan Area Hway 50 Irnprovement
Folsom Plan Area Hwy 50 Interchange
Folsom Plan Area Capital
Major C-apital and Renovation
Prairie Oak 1915 AD
CFD #10 Russell Ranch
CTD # 14 ParkwaY tr
Suhotal Ca$tal Project Fun&
6,893
7,464
15,196
17,051
16,511
7,244
193,869
3,238
16,390
5,288
570
643
56,443
71,489
363,446
135,651
147,261
27,769
90L,369
79,738
45,890
3,500
5,288
570
643
$
$ $$
5,380,624
5,255,863
$ 10,636,487 $ $ 9t2O7 $ t0.727.694
$$$$
2,200,000
10,000
2,490,000
1,916,600
500,000
100,000
1,731,030
2,643
197
136,240
1,187
395,2s1
104,660
52,595
136,4t4
208,840
8,307
8,460
10,000
2,661,243
10,000
2,643
197
136,240
l,lg7
4,586,851
704,660
167,595
196,414
2,094,870
688
676
25,000
50,688
50,000
100,000
18,199,980
50,000
$ 1,056,158 $$ 2200,000 $
16,290,460
rt-37
676

Page 307 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom FY2022-23 Budget
tllrL;ti'
I i:irl i,:r ri,i it i(,ltr) I l:\r I rti i:,
11r1.,;,,1;; :r,;. .i:"
l:..il:r I j, i':lir il, j'l
i. irq' lllri
i:,) t; i l. ,ir-I ;l,ltr :,,1.. ;]:;:r')iq r''
: 1r,.1: itliiill,l ',i, lir i:.,::tt: :r ,ll l ilir.:r;,::..q1i.ii, !ll, 'i\,li; .,i,.1i,'.11. ir'r(rlrr)rlri I l:irll,.ri:1,; i if r lrli
| 1;r'irli)I i lf r.i{,,r il i. i: ;.t( . :,il i r ri irl ' rr i II iilt,r: j i I i r i i'I I! rl.iI i i,llilr i\jrii, i'.r i',il1 rl;i i t.l:" r:
r il r i ir ir'i;1 I r',1 i irir: r; i I
iirrirl itlirtutti;trt,rii i l:!tri,,";
Transit
Water
Water Capital
Water Meters
Wastewater
'Wastewater Capital
Critical Augmentation
Crneral Augrnentation
Solid Waste
Solid Waste Capital
Iandfill Closure
Solid Waste Plan Area
Capital Replacenrent
RiskManagement
ated kaves
Assessnrent & CFD Agency Funds
Redevelopment Prop Tax Trust
Redevelopnrnt SA Trust - Housing
FolsomPlan Area Plan Fee
$$$$
3,420,W2
1,861,036
4,175,995
153,293
2,384,664
1,399,527
3,183,766
11,675,735
6,321,519
300,000
225,N0
2,L21,380
90,000
89,000
g,l42,l5g
85,000
100,000
$
8,706,957
$ l43l,u6 $
250,000
215,000
5,142,714
1 $$
$
$
$
II.38

Page 308 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Swnmory of Appropriations by Fund
$$$
363,732 $ 14J72309
- 3 J41,950
Transit
Water
Water Capital
Water Meters
Wastewater
Wastewater Capital
Critical Augmentation
Creneral Augmentation
Solid Waste
Solid Waste Capital
Landfill Closure
Solid Waste Plan Area ital
Capital Replacement
RiskManagement
ated Iraves
Assessment & CFD Agency Funds
Redevelopment Prop TaxTrust
Redevelopment SA Trust - Housing
FolsomPlan Area Plan Fee
$
L84s,A2
12,977,331
3,741,950
1,733,471
3,559,916
61,000
867,277
26,899
3,550
765,672
2,47L
54 118
1,721,291
907
16$22,824
326,899
228,550
9,911,531
92,471
54 89,118
23,426914
85,907
100,000
$
997
$ 494,314 $
1 I
4943r4
20,535,985
$
$$ $
rl';r11 li,ri!
I il!l!t ii\,'1, rr!i .l )i::

Ilir:rIrl:lii-,rrl.

1.,l,itll i r'i I i iI rl'.i!li i.l;lrj'tl 'i,,
rr r,i i,t rl ,Ii.:IL .Iirir;rt
i,. i.\il i!1rt...'l ;- r; ;i:i r:tr lirit'1,1., I trl: i'i,:r' i1t.i,l'r;rirl. )',,r',r li',rlrir
i:,ltl:ll ii'ilrtj
:ii' rii,, ;,1/'/,,i.1 r.ll)il,l
II-39

Page 309 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

ATTACHMENT 4

Page 310 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Stffing Detail
Below is a comparison of full time (FT) and permanent part time (PPT) positions for the FY 2019 through FY 2022 Budgets and the proposed FY 2022-23 Budget. All positions are listed as full-time equivalent except for City Council which is listed as number of members.

FY19
Amroved
F"r20
Amrorrcd
rr21
Amrorrcd
Fy22
Amrorrcd
Fr23
Proposed
City Council
Mayor
CouncilMember

1.00 4.00

1.00 4.00
Total City Council s.00 s.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
City Manager's Office
Administration
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Administrative Support Specialist
Public Information
Public Information O fficer
Media Specialist

1.00 0.50

1.00 1.00

0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.50 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.75

1.00 1.00

1.00 Total City Manager 5.00 4.50 4.50 4.75 4.75
City Attorney
Cily Attomey
Deputy/Asst City Attomey
Legal Analyst
Legal Secretary

1.00 1.00

1.00 l.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
l.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 Total Citv Attorney 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 .

City Clerk
Ciry Clerk
Deputy City Clerk
Assistant Cily Clerk
Cfu Clerk Technician II
Ciry Clerk Technician I

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
l 00

1.00 1.00 I .00 1.00
Total Citv Cledr 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
Community Development
Administration
C ommunity Development Director
Administrative As sistant
Office Assistant
Senior Office Assistant

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
l.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
VII.14

Page 311 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

City of Folsom FY 2022-23 Budget Staffing Detail
Frl9
Amrorrcd
FY20
Amorrcd
FY2I
Amorrcd
Flt22
Aorored
FY23
Proposed
Community Development (cont.)
Building
Build ing Irspector I/II
Building Plans Coordinator
Building Technician I/II
Plan Check Engineer
S enior Building Irspecto r
Principal C ivil Engineer
Code Enforcement
Code Enforcernent Officer I/II
C ode Enforcernent S upervisor
Engineering
Arborist
S enior C orstruction Irspector
C onstruction Irspector I/II
Engineering Technician I/II
City Engineer
Senior Civil Engineer
Planning
Building Inspector II
Plarrrer I (Asst)/Plarxrer II (Associate)
Plarudng Manager
Prhcipal Planner
Senior Planner

2.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 l 00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 2.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 l 00

1.00 1.00
l 00

2.00 2.00

1.00 2.00

2.00 l 00
l.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 2.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

2.00 1.00

2.00 1.00
Total Community Development 26.00 26.00 26.A0 26.00 26.00 Fire Department
Administration
Fire Chief
Fire Division Chief
Accounting Technician I/II
Administrative Tec hnic ian
Administrative As s istant
Ofice Assistant
Senior Office Assistant
Emergency Operations
Fire Division Chief
Fire Battalion Chief
Fire Captain- Stppression
Fire Engineer
Firefiglter

1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 t2.00
t2.00

42.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 15.00

15.00 36.00

1.00 2.OO

1.00 1.00
l 00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 15.00

15.00 46.00

2.00 1.00

15.00 15.00

36.00 1.00

2.00 15.00

15.00 36.00
vII-15

Page 312 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

City of Folsom FY 2022-23 Badget Stffing Detail
F r19
Arxrorrcd
FY2O
Atmor,ed
F.tt2l
Anrorrcd
Ftr22
.A.rnrorrcd
tv23
Prorxrsed
Fire Depaftment (cont.)
Fire Prevention
Deputy Fire Marshall
Fire Prevention Officer

1.00 2.00

1.00 2.00
Total Ffue 77.00 77.00 77.00 78.00 88.00
Human Resources
Human Resources Director
Human Resources Manager
Ad ministrative Assistant
Human Resources Technician I/II
S enior Mana gement Analyst

0.50 0.2s 0.s0 1.00

1.00 2.00

2.00 1.00

2.00 2.00

1.00 2.00

2.OO

1.00 2.00

2.OO

1.00 1.00

2.00 2.00
Total lluman Resources 5.50 s.2s 5.50 6.00 6.00
Library
Library Director
Administrative Assistant
Librarian
Lflorary Assistant
Lilor ary C irculation C oord inator
Library Technician
Marketing & Graphics Coord
Senior Librarian
Senior Office Assistant

1.00 1.00

2.00 4.00

1.00 2.00

0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 4.00

1.00 2.OO

0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 4.00

1.00 2.00

0.75 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 4.00

1.00 2.00
r.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 4.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 Total Library 12.75 12.75 12.75 t2.O0 12.00
Office of Management and Budget
Administration
Chief F inancial O fficerlF inance Director
Finance Director
Administrative Assistant
Disbursements
Disbursements Specialist
Payroll Specialist
Disbursements Technician
Revenue
Revenue Technician I/II
Revenue/Disbursements Manager
Revenue Supervisor
S enior Revenue Technician

1.00 2.00
l 00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

4.00 1.00

0.50 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 4.00

1.00 0.2s

1.00 1.00

4.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00
l 00

1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.OO

1.00 2.00
vrl-16

Page 313 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom F12022-23 Budget Stalfing Detail
fr '" I I
:.,\ ! .j ij\r'ii
l:,'l.r I
ir- | :rri1,:l-i
ti 'i "'J, ,'
rii qa11.i1;;riill: ': :,,t\: ti
;.:,,'/.,,
il iir\::li
OIIice of Management and Budget (cont.)
Financial Seruices
Accounting Technician II
Financial Specblist
Senior Finarrcial Analyst
Deputy Treasurer
Financial Services Manager
Information Systems
Inforrnation Systems Manager
Inforrnation S ystems Analyst
Inforrnation Systems Technician I/II
GIS Analyst

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
Process
Parks & Recneation
Administntion
Parks & Recreation Director
Administrative Assistart
Marketing & Graphics Coordinator
Maniagement Ana$st
S enior Management Anatyst
Park Maintenance
Mairfenance Specialist
Mairtenance Worker IAI
Parks/Facilities Maintenance Manager
Parks Srpervisor
Senior Mainterrance Worker
Park I)evelopment
Senior Park Planner
Park Planner
Trails
Senior Trails Planner
7no
Zookeeper I / II
Lead Zookeeper
Recreation C oordinator I
Recreation C oordinator II
Zoo Sr4rervisor

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00
s.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.O0
s.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 s.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 r.00

1.00 2.00

5.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00
s.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
iilrrlltrli{())iiil'trl,) ili' ltrYiil,lill,ti,,i"rllirilil, :r,li\il. lr)ltal,t,'ii ,.,..:,,.. ,ii: :'; ,),' , :rl ii),i, ,.,i,1 ilil) '.:',,,,itrt t VII.17

Page 314 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

City of Folsom FY 2022-23 Budget Staffing Detail
FY19
Amrored
F'Y20
Anprorrcd
Fv2l
Aprorrcd
Ftt22
Annorrcd
Fr23
Pronosed
Parks & Recreation (cont.)
Aquatics
Recreation Coordinator I
Recreation Coordinator II
Recreation Marleget
Recreation Supervisor
Senior Maintenance Worker
Community & Cultural Services /
Community Facilities
Commtrrity & Cultwal Services Manager
Recreation Coordinator I
Recreation Coordinator II
Recreation Supervisor
S enior Recreation Coordinator
Recreation / Sports Complex
Recreation Coordinator I
Recreation Coordinator II
Recreation Manager
Recreation Supervisor
S enior Re creation C oo rdin;ator
Facility Services
Facililies Maintenance Stpervisor
S enior Building Tradesworker
Build ing Trade sworker I/II
Municipal Landscaping
Lighting & Landscape District Manager
Construction Inspector I
Irrigation Systems C o ordinator
Maintenance S tpervisor
Senior Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Worker I/II

0.50 1.00

1.00 r.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.50 1.00

0.50 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 0.50

1.00 1.00

0.50 1.00

0.50 1.50

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.50

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.50 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.50

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
00 50
I
I

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00
Total Par*s & Recreation 48.00 48.00 48.00 48.00 49.00
Police Depaftment
Administration
Police Chief
Police Commarder
Administrative As sistant
Administrative Technician
Police Sergeant
Police Officer

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
vrr-18

1.00 1.00

Page 315 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom FY2022-23 Budget Staffing Detail
F"r 19
Amrorrcd
FY2O
Amorrcd
F"r2l
Apmorrcd
Fv22
Approrrcd
r'r23
Proposed
Police Department (cont.)
Support Services
Police Comrnander
Police Lietilenant
Police Support Services Manager
C ommunications S upervisor
Dispatcher I/II
Administrative Technician
Senior Records Clerk
Police Records Clerk
Police Records Clerk - PPT
Police Records S r.pervisor
Operations
Police Commarder
Commr.mity Service O fficer
Police Lieutenant
Police Sergeant
Police Corporal
Police Officer
Po lice Volunteer C oordinator
Investigations
Police Lieutenant
Police Sergeant
Police Offcer
Property and Evidence Technician
Commrmity Service Offcer
Crime & Intelligence Analyst
Animal Care Services
Animal Control Officer

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

13.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

0.50 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 9.00

5.00 43.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 10.00

2.00 1.00

3.00 13.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 0.s0

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

9.00 5.00

43.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

10.00 2.00

3.00 13.00

1.00 3.00

13.00 1.00

2.00 0.50

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

9.00 5.00

43.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

10.00 1.00 1.00

3.00 14.00

1.00 2.00

0.50 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 9.00

5.00 44.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 10.00

2.00 1.00

2.00 0.50
l 00

1.00 l.00

3.00 9.00

5.00 43.00

1.00 1.00

2.00 10.00

2.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00 1.00
Total Police Department 107.s0 107.50 107.50 107.50 110.50 Public Works Depaftment
Adminis tration / Enginee ring
Public Works Director
Administrative As s istant
C onstruction Irspector I/II
Engineering Technician I/II
PWfutilities Section Manager
Ofice Assistant
Senior Civil Engineer
S enior Management Analyst
Senior Office Assistant

0.80 r.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 0.75

0.80 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.80

1.00 1.00

0.80 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 0.50

0.80 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

0.75 1.00

3.00 0.75

1.00 VII-19

3.00 0.7s

1.00

Page 316 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom FY2022-23 Budget Staffing Detail
Public Works Department (cont.)
Fleet Maintenance
PW / Utilities Section Manager
Fleet/ Solid Waste Manager
Administrative Assistarr
Inverrtory Clerk
Lead Senior Mechanic
Mechanic II
Maintenance Worker I/II
S enior Equipment Mechanic
Streets
Maintenance Specialist
Mairtenance Worker I/II
Mechanic II
Senior Maintenarpe Worker
Streets Operations Srryervisor
Traffic Maintenance
Associate Civil Engineer .

Mairtenance Specialist
Senior CivilEngineer
Senior Maintenarrce Worker
Senior Traffic Control & LiEltt';rg Technician
Traftc Corrtrol & Lighting Srpervisor
Traffic Control & Lrytlting Technician I/II
Transit*
PW / Utilities Section Manager
Administrative As sistar$
Senior Managemerrt Ana$st
Transit Chief
Transit Bus Driver
Transit Br.rs Driver - PPT (@ 8O%)
Transit Coordinator
Transit Scheduler
Transit Trainer

0.30 o.20

0.10 1.00

1.00 4.00
o.10

1.00 3.00

4.to

1.OO

1.00 1.00

2.OO

1.00 1.O0

3.OO

0.10 0.40
o.25

1.00 4.00

6.40 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.35 o.20

0.10 1.00

1.00 4.00

0.10 1.00

3.OO

4.to

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.OO

1.00 1.00

3.OO

0.35 o.20

0.10 1.00

1.00 4.00

0.10 1.00

3.00 4.10

1.00 1.00

1.O0
l.o0

0.35 0.35

0.10 1.OO

1.00 4.to

3.OO

4.OO

0.10 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 o.3s

0.35 0.10

1.00 1.00

4.to

1.OO 1.00

3.00 4.00

0.10 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 4.00 4.OO 4.00
Environmental and Water Resourtes
Wate r Re s ources Administtation
Director
Administrative Assistarr
Administrative Technician
Associate Civil Engineer
Engineering Technician I/II
Marketing & Graphics Coord
PW / Utilities SectionManager
SCADA Programmer
Senior CivilEngineer
Senior Office Assistant

1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00
o.25

1.00 1.00

2.OO

1.00 1.00

1.00 o.25

1.00 1.00

2.OO

1.OO

1.00 1.00
o.2s

1.O0
l.o0

2.OO
l.oo

1.OO

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.OO

2.OO

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.OO

2.OO
00 00
I
1 VII.2O

Page 317 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Cityof Folsom FY2022-23 Badget Staffing Detoil
l.
,
.,, l.1i: : t, .i .:.,
I
/:lr it,::l1rir .l^.,,r1;r.\-L I, r,t,ji.i rr|rlrIi rit, lr:l'rt I Lr\'1: ri
Environmental and Water Resources (cont.)
Wastewater
Revenue Technician I/II
Senior Wastewater Collection Teclmician
Utilities Technician
Wastewater C ollection S upervisor
Wastewater Collection Tech I/II
Water Conservation
Water Management Coordinator
Water Management Specialist
Wate r Utility Maintenance
Senior Water Utility Worker
Utilrty Maintenance S r.pervisor
Water Utilrty Worker I/II
WaterTrcatment Plant
Lead Plant Mechanic
Plant Mechanic
Senior Offce Assistant
Water Treatrnent Plant Chief Operator
Water Treatrnent Plant Operator III
Water Treatrnerfi Plant Operatorl /lI
Water Treatment Plant Sr.pervisor
Water Quality
Water Distribtrion Chief Operator
Water Disfribrlion Operator IAI
Water Quality Technician
Water Distribdion Sr4pervisor
WaterMetering Pmgram
Utilfy Maintenance Sr4ervisor
Senior Water Utility Worker
Senior Water Meter Worker

2.00 1.00

1.00 10.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 r.00
s.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

3.00 2.00

1.00 11.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

5.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

2.O0

1.00 11.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

5.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

2.O0

1.00 11.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00
s.00

1.00 4.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 11.00

1.00 2.00

1.00 1.00

5.00 1.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 4.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00
Water Worker I/II 3.00 3.00 3.00
iililtlilflirt,':jiitrjjlitlirt)!l'if;r.r)riL i'..i.riiirrli ll.i:,I.:j(1)illii,iilrr; '.,:,' ',.t",' ', ,"::,,,:'i' '.,'t ).t'.'i. ',i ;.liiir t,ltrlilll, vtr-21

Page 318 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

City of Folsom FY 2022-23 Budget Stalling Detail
Solid Waste Department
Solid Waste Collections
Public Works Director
PW / Utilities Section Manager
Solid Waste / Fleet Manager
Solid Waste Supervisor
Administrative Assistant
Account Technician
S enior Management Analyst
Maintenance Worker I/II
Mechanic II
Refuse Driver
S enior Maintenance Worker
Senior Office Assistant
Hazardous Materials
Hazardous Materials Coordinator
Mainternnce Specialist
S enior Environmental Specialist
Recycling
Environmental Specialist Supervisor 1.00 1.00 1.00

0.20 0.60

0.80 1.00

0.50 1.00

0.2s

1.80 1.00

31.00 2.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.20 0.65

0.80 1.00

0.90 1.00

0.25 1.80

1.00 31.00

2.00 3.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 0.20

0.65 0.80

1.00 0.90

1.00 0.25

1.80 1.00

31.00 2.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

0.20 0.65

0.6s

1.00 0.90

1.00 0.25

1.00 1.80

37.00 2.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.OO

0.20 0.65

0.65 1.00

0.90 1.00

0.25 1.00
l.80

38.00 2.00

3.00 1.00

1.00 1.00

1.00 2.00Senior Environmental S
*Transit - During Fiscal Year 2079 the City Transit Services were annexed by Sacramento Regional Transit vrt-22

Page 319 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

This page is intentionally left blank.

Page 320 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.14.

Folsom City Council
Staff Re rt

RECOMMENDATION / COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 10871- A Resolution Adopting the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments2022 Active Transportation Plan (ATP).

BACKGROUND / ISSUE
In July 2019, the city received Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG)2019 State of Good Repair Planning and Project Development Grant Program funding in the amount of $150,000, with a crty match of $50,000, to develop a citywide Active Transportation Plan (ATP). Folsom's first ATP will combine and update the master plans for both pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The ATP will guide the planning, development, and maintenance of existing and future bicycle and pedestrian facilities within the city, including recommended citywide active transportation network improvements and Safe Routes to School. The city is committed to the design and operation of what is referred to as, "Complete Streets", providing equitable, safe, and effective use of all streets by all users. The pu{pose of the ATP is to increase bicycling and walking opportunities through the creation of a safe, connected, convenient, and visible active transportation network.

The Draft Active Transportation Plan (ATP) was presented at the April28, 2022, Traffic Safety Committee; April 5,2022, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting; April 6, 2022, Planning Commission meeting; and April 12,2022, City Council meeting. A presentation was made at eachmeeting and comments received. The final ATP was presented to the Parks I
MEETING DATE: 6114/2022
AGENDA SECTION: Old Business
SUBJECT: Resolution No. 10871- A Resolution Adopting the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments2l22 Active
Transportation Plan (ATP)
FROM: Parks and Recreation Department

Page 321 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
and Recreation Commission on June 7,2022, where the Commission recommended to the City Council to adopt the ATP.

ANALYSIS
The City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan (ATP) is the city's plan for improving mobility for all residents and visitors who walk, bike, and run in and around Folsom. It evaluates what exists today and recommends policies, infrastructure projects, supporting programs, and implementation priorities to achieve this vision. Through improved bikeways, shared use paths, and sidewalks, the ATP establishes a complete and connected network that supports people of all ages and abilities.

The ATP is an update to the previously adopted Bicycle Master Plan (2007), and Pedestrian Master Plan (2014). It focuses on improving the safety and comfort of active transportation facilities, improving connections among on-and-off-street facilities, and supporting connections to destinations across the city.

The ATP contents include the following:

Chapter 1: Introduction outlines the purpose of the ATP, its relationship to other plans, and considers the benefits of active transportation.

Chapter 2: Goals, Objectives, and Policies establishes the vision and priorities for the ATP.

Chapter 3: Existing Conditions evaluates the broader context of the ATP, including demographic and development trends; the transportation system; and the current state of the active transportation network, including bicycle, pedestrian, and shared use path facilities in the city.

Chapter 4: Outreach & Community Engagement summarizes the engagement activities and findings conducted as part of the ATP.

Chapter 5: Recommendations describes the proposed improvements to the pedestrian, path, and bicycle networks. Recommendations include programs and policies to support an expanded active transportation system.

Chapter 6 : Implementation prioritizes recommended active transportation improvements, presents ranked project lists, and explores implementation opportunities and strategies.

Throughout the ATP process, Folsom residents and visitors were invited to share their experiences with and vision for the city's active transportation network. Through in-person events and online forums, members of the public provided input at every phase of the plan.

This chapter provides an overview of engagement opportunities and a sunmary of key trends of feedback received. Engagement occurred in two primary phases:
a
a
a
a
a
o
2 Page 322
06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Phase 1: During this phase, project staff provided information about the plan, gathered input on key questions, and answered questions about the process. Staff also asked how people travel today, including community-specific needs and challenges.

Phase 2: During this phase, community members were encouraged to review draft plan goals and proposed location-specific project recommendations, and to indicate anything missing and their highest priority projects.

The engagement strategy included both in-person and virtual events to provide multiple opportunities to participate while adhering to public health guidance. Each event considered the city's active transportation system comprehensively; at each event or input opportunity, questions sought feedback on the bicycle, pedestrian, and path networks simultaneously to better understand how the networks work together. Participants provided more than2,500 comments through digital tools. In-person and virtual events were promoted through city channels, including the city website, social mediapages, and crty's newsletters.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan (ATP) includes more than 300 projects that will advance the safety and function of.the active transportation network, with about 65 projects identified as high priority. Based on planning-level cost estimates, it is expected to cost more than $301 million to implement all recommended projects, and $88,000,000 to implement the high priority projects outlined in the Plan.

Project implementation requires a deliberate strategy and exploration of innovattve approaches. With limited resources and high demand for improvements, the city should coordinate with relevant departments and partners to identiS opportunities for project delivery. The strategies explored below are opportunities for the city to support the implementation of the ATP's programs, recommended project improvements, and goals and policies over time.

Additional strategies for project implementation can be found beginning on page 91 of the ATP and should be considered not only for the projects listed here but also for future project phases to advance the ATP.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The development and adoption of the ATP is a planning and feasibility study that will guide future actions by the City Council and is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15262.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 10871 - A Resolution Adopting the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Department s 2022 Active Transportation Plan (ATP) o
o
J Page 323
06/14/2022 Item No.15.

2. Final Active Transportation Plan (ATP)
Submitted,
Lorraine Poggione, Parks and Recreation Director
4 Page 324
06/14/2022 Item No.15.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 325 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

RESOLUTION NO. 10871

A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PUBLIC WORKS AND PARKS AND
RECREATTON DEPARTMENTS 2022 ACTTVE TRANSPORTATTON PLAN (ATP) WHEREAS, in May 20l9,the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) released a call for applications for the 2019 State of Good Repair Planning and Project Development Grant Funding Program; and
WHEREAS, in July 2019, staff was notified that the City was awarded a grant in the amount of $150,000, plus $50,000 in City matching funds from Measure A (Fund 276); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Folsom desires to develop a complete and balanced system of walking and biking conditions to support residents as they travel and recreate in and around the city; and
WHEREAS, the ATP builds on prior planning and policy efforts, including the General Plan, to create a cohesive and comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Active Transportation Plan (ATP) will not add any new or significant adverse impacts and is therefore exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) with individual future projects to be separately analyzed under CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Active Transportation Plan (ATP) is the long-term capital improvement program for active transportation facilities; and
WHEREAS, on June 7,2022, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended adoption of the ATP to the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Folsom, based on its review and consideration of the Active Transportation Plan, and all public testimony:
1, Finds that the Active Transportation Plan is in the public interest and will advance the health, safety, and general welfare of the City of Folsom.

2. Finds that the Active Transportation Plan is consistent with the Folsom General Plan PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14ft day of June 2022,by the following roll-call vote AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Councilmember(s):

Christa Freemantle, CITY CLERK
Resolution No. 10871
Page I of I
Keni M. Howell, MAYOR

Page 326 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 327 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Page 328 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Acknowledgments
Parks and Recreation Department
Lorraine Poggione
Director
Public Works Department
Mark Rackovan
Director
City Council
Kerri Howell
Moyor
Brett Bollinger
Senior Troils Planner
Zach Bosch
Sen i or Civi I Engi n eer/Traffic
Rosario Rodriguez
Vice Moyor
Tim O'Shea
Focilities Manager Traffic Safety Committee
Scott Bailey
Citi ze n Rep rese ntotive
David Soulsby
Citi ze n Rep rese ntative
Bob Delp
Bicycle/Pedestrio n Sofety
Matt washburn
Folsom Cordovo Unified School District
(FCUSD)
Sarah Aquino
Councilmember
Lesley Miller
Mo rketing o nd Gro phics Coord i n ator
YK Chalamcherla
Councilmember
Parks and Recreation
Commission
Dave Nazworth
Chair
Mike Kozlowski
Councilmember
Brian Wallace
Vice Choir
Stakeholders
Jim Kirstein
Friends of Folsom Parkwoys (FOFP)
Samantha Davidson
Commissioner
Zach Bosch
Pu b I ic Wo rks Depa rtment
Chief Rick Hillman
Police Deportment
Lynn LePage
Friends of Folsom Porkwoys (FOFP)
Matt Hedges
Commissioner
Tony Powers
Resident
WillKempton
Commissioner
Chief Ken Cusano
Fire Deportment
Robert Goss
Resident
Marina Leight
Commissioner
Gina Silvernale
Resident
Tanya Morales
Commissioner

Page 329 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Table of Contents

CHAPTER I I TNTRODUCTTON
CHAPTER il | GOALS, OBJECTTVES, AND POLtCtES
CHAPTER ilt i EXtSTtNG CONDTIONS
AND NETWORK NEEDS .. ..

CHAPTER IV I COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT

CHAPTER V I RECOMMENDATIONS
CHAPTERVt I TMPLEMENTATTON ...

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: DESIGN GUIDELINES
APPENDIX B: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NEEDS ANALYSIS
5 0
1 13
31 37
59 City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Table of Contents I iii

Page 330 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
))
Chapter I I Introduction

Page 331 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Plan Purpose I
The City of Folsom Active Transportation
Plan (ATP) is the city's plan for improving
mobility for all residents and visitors who
walk, bike, run, and rolll in and around
Folsom. lt evaluates what exists today
and recommends policies, infrastructure
projects, supporting programs, and
implementation priorities to achieve
this vision. Through improved bikeways,
shared use paths, and sidewalks, the ATP
establishes a complete and connected
network that supports people of all ages
and abilities.

The ATP is an update to the previously-
adopted Bicycle Master Plan (2007) and
Pedestrian Master Plan (2014).lt focuses
on improving the safety and comfort of
active transportation facilities, improving
connections among on- and off-street
facilities, and supporting connections to
destinations across the city.
1 The term roll refers to a person who might use a wheelchair, assisfive mobility devices, or other human-powererl de'Jice on wheels.

PLAN CONTENTS
Chapter 1: Introduction outlines the
purpose of the ATP, its relationship to other
plans. and considers the benefits of active
tra nsp0 rtation.

Chapter 2: Goals, Objectives, and Policies
establishes the vision and priorities for the
ATP.

Chapter 3: Existing Conditions evaluates
the broader context of the ATP, including
demographic and development trends; the
transportation system; and the current
state of the active transportation network,
including bicycle, pedestrian, and shared use
path facilities in the city.

Chapter 4: Outreach & Community
Engagement summarizes the engagement
activities and findings conducted as part of
thE ATP.

Chapter 5: Recommendations describes
the proposed improvements to the
pedestrian, path, and bicycle networks.

Recommendations include programs and
policies to support an expanded active
transportation system.

Chapter 6: lmplementation prioritizes
recommended active transportation
improvements, presents ranked project
lists, and explores implementation
opportunities and strategies

RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS
The City of Folsom ATP aims to create a
complete and balanced system of walking,
biking, and rolling conditions to support
residents as they travel and recreate
in and around the city. The ATP builds
on prior planning and policy efforts to
create a cohesive and comprehensive
plan. A thorough review of relevant and
applicable planning and policy efforts
from local, regional, and federal level plans
helped inform the process, goals, and
recommendations in the ATP.

Local and regional planning documents-
specifically those aimed at improving
walking and biking-informed
development of the ATP.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan Executive Summary i 2

Page 332 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Local plans reviewed include the City of
Folsom Bicycle Master Plan (2007), the City
of Folsom Pedestrian Master Plan (2014),
the Folsom Generol Plan, the City of Folsom
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Self-
Evaluation and Transition Plan (2009) and
the Folsom Plan Area Specific P/on (FPA).

Regional plans reviewed include the
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
(SACOG) Metropolitan Transportation Plan/
Susta i n a b I e Co m m u n ities Strategy (2020);
lhe Regional Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails
Master Plan (2013); the Sacramento County
Bicycle Master Plan (2011);the Sacramento
County Pedestrian Master Plan (2007);
lhe Sacromento County Americons with
Disabilities Act Transition Plan (2020); the
Sacramento Region Parks and Trails Strategic
Development Plan; the Cslifornia State Parks
Recreational Trail Plan (2002); and the E/
Dorado County Active Transportation Plan
(2020).

BENEFITS OF ACTIVE

TRANSPORTATION
lnvestment in active transportation
infrastructure-including bikeways,
sidewalks, and shared use paths*
supports residents, employees, and
visitors as they travel in and around
Folsom. Active transportation can
support a more active lifestyle; support
people as they connect to employment,
educational opportunities, or recreation;
or serve as the primary way to travel. The
benefits of active transportation are well-
documented and broad-reaching, including
environmental, economic, and health and
wellness^ Benefits lnclude:

Health and Equity Benefits
A connected active transportation
network can provide safer and more
comfortable ways to travel for all ages
and abilities. Low-stress networks can
expand access to schools, jobs, homes,
and parks-connecting residents to
economic, educational, and recreational
opportunities. Active transportation
supports those who cannot drive, choose
not to drive, or cannot afford to own a car
Furthermore, active transportation
supports mental and physical well-being
through reduced stress and anxiety, and
other health benefits associated with
higher levels of activity. Creating reliable
bicycling and pedestrian infrastructure can
also improve access to parks and other
active recreation destinations.

Recommendations put forth in the ATP
incorporate previous planning efforts,
while acknowledging changing conditions
in the city influencing the growth of active
transportation networks.
3 r Executive Summary City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 333 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Safety Benefits
Prioritizing development of bicycling and
walking infrastructure can improve safety
and comfort levels for all active users.

Developing bicycling and walking facilities,
improving crossings, and promoting
education for safer travel can reduce
potential conflicts among people walking,
bicycling, and driving. Well-designed
roadways and active transportation
facilities can improve safety for all roadway
users through increased predictability and
increased separation from motor vehicles.

Quality of Life Benefits
Active transportation provides more
options for how people get around,
regardless of their reason for travel.
lmproved infrastructure that provides
comfortable and safe routes of travel
can encourage more people to use active
modes and increase connections to
educational, economic, and recreational
opportunities.

Environ mental Benefits
More people walking and biking supports
environmental goals by reducing vehicle
miles traveled (VMT), improving air quality,
and reducing greenhouse Bas emissions.

This further supports increased quality of
life, particularly for individuals vulnerable
to respiratory conditions and other
sensitive groups.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan i Executive Summary i 4

Page 334 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
))
Chapter II I Goals, Objectives, and Policies

Page 335 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Folsom Active Transportation Goals, Objectives, and Policies I The ATP reflects community values and a
vision for an active transportation network
that supports biking, walking, and rolling
for residents of all ages and abilities. The
Goals, Objectives, and Policies presented
below establish concrete procedures
and priorities that will guide Folsom in
achieving this vision.

The Goals, Objectives, and Policies of
the ATP were informed by relevant local
and regional plans, the results of the
needs analysis, and public feedback. The
framework reflects a vision consistent with
previous active transportation planning
efforts and localand regional plans,
including the Folsom GeneralPlon; and the
SACOG Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Trails Master
Plan.

The Goals, Objectives, and Policies
informed project and program
recommendations, project prioritization,
and implementation strategies. As the city
grows, implements projects, and changes
over time, these Goals, Objectives, and
Policies should be used to guide future
actions.

GOAL 1:

SAFETY & COMFORT
Folsom will be a safe and comfortable
place for people of all ages and abilities
to walk, bike, and roll.

Objective 1.1: Reduce the number of
severe injuries and fatalities involving
people walking, bicycling, and rolling.

Policy 1.7.1: Evaluate local design
standards for bikeways, pedestrian
facilities, and paths. Revise as applicable
for consistency with best practices and
state and federal standards.

Policy 1.1.2: Prioritize low-stress
facilities, such as separated bikeways,
and improve safety for people walking
and bicycling at intersections and street
crossings.

Policy 1.1.3: Establish and implement a
comprehensive Vision Zero program to
advance safety for all users.

Policy 1.1.4: Monitor bicycle- and
pedestrian-involved collisions annually
and adjust infrastructure and program
approaches as needed to achieve a
reduction in bicycle- and pedestrian-
involved collisions.

Objective 1.2: Advance and expand the
safety and comfort of Class I facilities in
Folsom.

Policy 1.2.1: lmprove the safety and
comfort for people utilizing Class I
facilities at intersections and street
crossings.

Policy 1.2.2: Prioritize grade-separated
crossings at intersection of Class I
facilities and major arterial streets.

Policy 1.2.3: Utilize best practices
design standards and guidelines to
accommodate all path user groups.

Consider wider paths, separated
spaces for travel. and other design
interventions to improve safety and
comfort along Class I facilities.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan i Goals. Objectives, and Policies i 6

Page 336 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Objective'1.3: Streets and paths should be
safe and accessible to people with limited
mobility and other disabilities.

Policy 1.3.7: Evaluate and revise design
guidelines as needed to provide
for accessible facilities. New and
reconstructed facilities shall meet the
requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA).

Policy 1.3.2: lmplement the City of Folsom
ADA Self-Evaluation & Transition Plan
(200e)
Objective 1.4: Create a comfortable
and sustainable environment for people
walking, biking, and rolling.

Policy 1.4.1: lmprove lighting along
designated walking and biking routes,
particularly near local destinations such
as schools, parks, transit stops, and
commercial areas
Policy 1.4.2: lncorporate green
infrastructure, when possible, into
bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Green
infrastructure describes sustainable
stormwater management practices
and infrastructure such as biofiltration
planters, bioretention swales, trees, and
permeable pavement surfaces.

Policy 7.4.3: Adopt a Complete Streets
Ordinance to ensure that Folsom
streets consider the needs of all users,
including bicyclists, public transit
users, children, seniors, persons with
disabilities, pedestrians, motorists, and
movers of commercial goods.

Policy 1,4.4: Prioritize incorporating
cooling infrastructure to reduce
extreme heat along bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, including shade
structures, cool paving areas, and
extended planting areas.
7 i Goals, Objectives, and Policies I City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 337 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
r+o.....h+
ba
GOAL 2:

CONNECTIVITY
& ACCESS
A connected network of bicycle and
pedestrian facilities will provide
Folsom residents access to destinations
within neighborhoods, across the city, and
in neighboring ju risdictions.

Objective 2.1: Develop a continuous,
interconnected system of paths, bikeways,
and pedestrian facilities.

Policy 2.1.1: ldentify and fill sidewalk
gaps in the pedestrian network to
provide for a complete and connected
network.

Policy 2.1.2: Require sidewalks along all
new arterial, collector, and local roads.

Policy 2.1.3: ldentify and complete gaps
in the bicycle network. Prioritize low-
stress facilities, including Class I Paths,
Class lV Separated Bikeways, and Class
lllB Bicycle Boulevards.

Policy 2.1.4: lmprove connections
between low-stress facilities to
provide for a complete and connected
multimodal network.

Policy 2.1.5: Encourage the use of natural
and manmade corridors such as creeks,
powerline corridors, railroad corridors,
and other corridors for future bike path
alignments. This includes the Southern
Pacific Rail right-of-way.

Objective 2.2: lmprove and expand
bicycle and pedestrian access to local and
regional destinations, to other modes
of transportation, and across physical
ba rriers.

Policy 2.2.1: lmprove and provide
connections across physical barriers
such as creeks, highways, and major
arterials. This includes overcrossings in
areas with limited connectivity.

Policy 2.2.2: Provide connections
between modes, including bicycle
and pedestrian connections to local
and regional transportation options,
including transit, buses that can
accommodate bicycles, and park-and-
ride lots.

Policy 2.2.3: lmprove bicycle and
pedestrian access from residential areas
to schools, transit, commercial areas,
and employment centers.

Policy 2.2.4: Require the continuation of
the street network between adjacent
development projects to enhance active
transportation and allow easier access
for emergency vehicles.

Policy 2.2.5: Connect the city's bikeways
with state parks, Lake Natoma, and
Folsom Lake paths.

Policy 2.2.6: Connect bicycle and
pedestrian facilities in Folsom to
su rrou nding ju risd ictions.

Policy 2.2.7: Provide connections
between residential neighborhoods,
where appropriate, to encourage
pedestrian and bicycle travel.

Objective 2.3: Provide navigation support
for people walking and biking.

Policy 2.3.1: Develop and implement a
comprehensive wayfinding program
that is unified, legible, and supports
people walking, biking, or using the path
system.

Policy 2.3.2: Develop supporting
navigational material, including city-
wide path and bicycle maps. These
materials should be made widely
available both in print and online.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan r Goals, Objectives, and Polictes 8

Page 338 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

GOAL 3:

MAINTENANCE
& SUPPORTIVE

INFRASTRUCTURE
The active transportation network will
remain in a state of good repair and
incorporate support facilities that work
toward improving the quality of life for all
residents.

Objective 3.1: Actively maintain bicycle
and pedestrian facilities.

Policy 3.1.1: Maintain active
transportation facilities, including
bikeways, sidewalks, crossings, and
paths, to provide for safe travel for all
use rs.

Policy 3.1.2: Regularly sweep streets and
clear bicycle and pedestrian facilities of
debris, with priority given to those with
higher pedestrian and bicycle traffic and
low-stress bicycle facilities.

Policy 3.1.4: Provide alternate routes
for people who walk and bike during
construction activities.
. Policy 3.7.5; Develop funding strategies
to provide ongoing path maintenance.

Objective 3.2: Supplement the bicycle
and pedestrian networks with high
quality support facilities such as bike
corrals, lockers, bike parking, showers,
bike storage, repair stations, and water
fountains.

Policy 3.2.1: Develop a coordinated
strategy to develop and implement
support facilities in Folsom.

Policy 3.2.2: Review and revise city
bicycle parking requirements for all
land uses, including commercial areas,
parks and open space, at trailheads,
and in connection with transit. Require
adequate short- and long-term bicycle
parking.

Policy 3.2.4: Coordinate with local
businesses and organizations to locate
and implement support facilities.

Policy 3.2.5: Work with local and regional
transit agencies to install secure bike
parking and to maintain bike racks on
b uses.

Policy 3.2.6: Work with local and regional
transit agencies to incorporate shade
trees, bus shelters, and other cooling
infrastructure at transit stops.

Policy 3.2.7: Provide bike repair stations
at convenient locations.

Policy j.l.3: Trim overhanging and
encroaching vegetation to maintain a
clear travel path along Class I Paths in
Folsom.
9 I Goals, Objectives, and Policies r City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 339 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

GOAL 4:

EDUCATION &

ENCOURAGEMENT
Folsom will support walking, bicycling,
and rolling through new and expanded
education, encouragement, and awareness
programs.

Objective 4.1: Promote Safe Routes
to School
Policy 4.1.1: Coordinate and collaborate
with all local school districts to create a
citywide Safe Routes to School Program
, Policy 4.1.2: Support school travel
safety assessments at Folsom schools
to identify needs and opportunlties
and pursue grant funding for
implementation.

Objective 4.2: Encourage people to walk
and bike through education and awareness
e ffo rts.

Policy 4.2.7: Participate in regional
planning activities and awareness
programs.

Policy 4.2.2: Promote public education of
bicycle and pedestrian safety and traffic
laws.

Policy 4.2.3: Develop a citywide
Transportation Demand Management
Program, which provides a menu of
strategies and programs for developers
and employers to reduce single-
occupant vehicle travel in the city.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan : Goals, Objectives, and Policies , 10

Page 340 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Page 341 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

GOAL 5:

FUNDING
& IMPLEMENTATION
Folsom will implement recommended
infrastructure projects and programs that
are funded through a variety of sources,
including grants, repaving programs, and
coordinating with other development
projects or partner agencies.

Objective 5.1: Provide sufficient funding
t0 construct, maintain, and operate
transportation facilities and services
needed to achieve the city's active
transportation goals.
. Policy 5.7.1: ldentify regional, state, and
federal funding programs and attempt
to secure as much funding as possible
for pedestrian and bicycle facilities and
programs.

Objective 5.2: Utilize private development
to implement improvements to the bicycle
and pedestrian network.
. Policy 5.2.7: Require allnew
development to provide a system of
sidewalks, paths, and bikeways that link
all land uses, provide accessibility to
parks and schools, and connect to all
existing or planned external street and
path facilities.

Policy 5.2.2: Require all new
development to dedicate rights-of-
way, construct facilities, or pay its
fair share for needed transportation
infrastructure improvements that
support all travel modes, including
pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities,
roadway improvements, and ITS and
transportation demand management
(TDM) programs and services.

Objective 5.3: Prioritize recommended
infrastructure projects and programs.
. Policy 5.3.7: Develop a comprehensive
active transportation plan, including a
list of prioritized, practical, and publicly-
supported infrastructure projects and
programs. lncorporate priority projects
into the city's Capital lmprovement Plan
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Goals, Objectives, and Policies i 12

Page 342 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
>
Chapter III I Existing Conditions
and Network Needs

Page 343 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Context and Demographics I

PROJECT SETTING
The City of Folsom prides itself in being
an active city with a small-town feel and
a high quality of life. Located at the base
of the foothills of the Sierra Nevada along
the American River and adjacent to the
Folsom Lake State Recreation Area, the
city's proximity to regional multi-use paths
and parks makes it a popular destination
for active recreation. Building upon
Folsom's extensive bikeway network, the
city is an ideal place to focus on improving
the bicycle and pedestrian network for
everyday transportation.

DEMOGRAPHICS
Folsom is located in the northeast corner
of Sacramento County, approximately 18
miles northeast of the City of Sacramento.

The city covers approximately 28 square
miles and is home to nearly 81,000
residents.l Since 2010, the population
of Folsom has increase d by 130/* and is
projected to continue growing each year.3
Nearly one-quarter of Folsom residents
are under 1B years of age, while 130/o are
age 65 or older. Although this represents
less than 500/o of the population, residents
in these age groups are often the most
vulnerable road users, and opportunities
to provide safer routes to access schools,
services, and other destinations should be
a priority.

US CensLrs, American Commu nity Survey 20 I9
U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census ol Paplllation and Housing Folsom General Plan, HoLrsing Element 2fJ21
Figure 1 Demographic Characteristicsl

CITY OF
FOLSOM

SACRAMENTO
COUNTV
I

36.640.1
medion
age
median
household
income
$119,924 $zz,otz
2g%
persons
wtith at-home
longuage other
than English
33%

22.9% 23.4%

12.6% \ii:#i r4.4%
persons
1 8 years
& younger
'l U.S. Census, Ameri(an Cornqrunity SuIVey 201-c)
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan , Existing Conditions and Network Needs I 14

Page 344 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Land Use & Development
Folsom's land use is primarily residential,
with a suburban character. Residential
areas are comprised of primarily
single-family homes, which account for
approximately 750/o of all housing units.

Neighborhoods include a series of winding
roadways and cul-de-sacs in residential
areas that limit connectivity within and
among neighborhoods. These areas are
also distinct from commercial areas, often
separated by major arterials that limit
connections between areas. Commercial
areas are focused in two main areas:
the Folsom Historic District and along
East Bidwell Street from Coloma Street
to Highway 50. Other commercial areas
extend along streets such as lron Point
Road and Blue Ravine Road.

Folsom has both neighborhood-
focused destinations, such as parks
and schools, in addition to citywide and
regional destinations, including Folsom
Lake College, shopping centers, and
employment centers. Many neighborhood
destinations are located within or near
residential areas, making these relatively
short trips good candidates for active
transportation instead of driving. Citywide
and regional serving destinations likely
require travel on or across an arterial or
collector road. These high-volume and
high-speed roadways typically serve as
barriers to walking and biking.

The Folsom Historic District, adjacent to
Lake Natoma, is distinct from other areas
in Folsom. This area has a grid-based
street network that provides residents with
direct connections to destinations within
the district. The arterials and collector
streets radiate from the Historic District,
deviating from the grid and following a
more suburban development pattern.

The majority of Folsom's residential areas
are connected to the Folsom Historic
District by these major arterials, serving
as a barrier for people walking and biking.
ldentified through public input and as a
guiding principle of the Folsom General
Plan, the Folsom Historic District is a major
attraction for shopping, dining, recreation,
and culture. Improved biking and walking
connections to and from the district,
especially along arterials. will be important
in maintaining the vibrancy of the area.

The Folsom Plan Area, which includes
3,520 acres south of HighwaY 50, is a
rapidly developing community that, once
implemented, will include a mix of uses
and housing types with a focus on parks,
walkability, transit connectivity, and paths
Currently, however, Highway 50 serves as
a barrier to access the Folsom Plan Area.
lmproving biking and walking connections
across Highway 50 will be crucial to
integrating this new community with the
rest of the city.

I
15 , Existing Conditions and Network Needs I City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 345 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Transportation Overview
Despite these travel options, most Folsom
workers drive to work alone (77%), while
a significantly smaller percentage walk
(1.BVo\, take transit (1.60/o), or bike to work
(0.60/o). Nearly 800/o of workers living in
Folsom leave the city each day, with
the majority traveling to employment
locations in Sacramento.s Similarly, more
than 35,000 workers enter Folsom each
day for work. while a similar number of
people enter the city each day.6 Given the
commute patterns of workers in Folsom.
the active transportation network should
consider opportunities to improve access
to and from regional transportation
options such as regional bus routes, light
rail stations, and the regional bikeway
network.

Figure 2 Commute Mode Share
Means of transportation to work
77o/o
7o/0"
-
2a/o* 1o/o* 2o/o-
Bicycle Walked

5. Folsom General Plan, City of Folsom Housing Element Background Report 2021

6. Data reflect 2019 American Community Survey estimates. This data does not reflect changes to commute patterns due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
0 ln addition to the city's robust network of
paths and roadways, existing on-street
bikeways. sidewalks, and transit support
travel in and around the city. Light rail
stations, as part of the Sacramento
Regional Transit (5acRT) Gold Line, are
located along Folsom Boulevard in the
western area of the city and connect to
Downtown Sacramento. These include
the lron Point, Glenn, and Historic Folsom
stations. Local bus service is also run
by SacRT on the Folsom Stage Line and
El Dorado Transit operates regional bus
service through Folsom on the 50 Express.

Drove alone Carpooled Public Transit
*Unlverse: Workers 16 and over: ACS 2019 S-year data
Commute patterns, however, do not
reflect trips made for other reasons, such
as travel to school, nor do they account
for recreational use of shared use paths,
on-street facilities, and supporting
facilities. COVID-l9 has also shifted travel
patterns and the necessity of office work
for some professions. These shifts may
have medlum- to long-term effects on
commute-related transportation. The total
percentage of residents that walk and
bicycle for recreation and to meet their
daily needs, therefore, is likely higher than
what the census data shows.
1o/o*
Other
110/o-
-
Worked at home
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan Existing Conditions and Network Needs i 16

Page 346 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Bicycle Faeility Types

CLASS I SHARED USE PATH (PATH)
Shared use paths are bicycle facilities
that are completely separated from the
street. They allow two-way travel by people
bicycling.and walking, as well as other
non-motorized or e-powered users like
skateboards or scooters. Class I facilities
are among the most comfortable facilities
for children and inexperienced riders as
there are few potential conflicts between
people bicycling and people driving.

CLASS II BICYCLE LANE
Bicycle lanes are striped preferential lanes
on the roadway for one-way bicycle travel.

Some bicycle lanes include a striped buffer
on one or both sides to increase separation
from the traffic lane or from parked cars.

When this striped buffer is included in the
design, the facility is known as a Class llB
Buffered Bicycle Lane.

CLASS III BICYCLE ROUTE
Bicycle routes are signed where people
bicycling share a travel lane with people
driving. Because they are shared facilities,
bicycle routes are most appropriate for
low-speed and low-volume streets. Some
Class lll Bicycle Routes include shared lane
markings or "sharrows" that recommend
proper bicycle positioning in the center
of the travel lane and alert drivers that
people biking may be present.

CLASS IIIB BICYCLE BOULEVARD
Bicycle boulevards are low-traffic, local
streets where people biking have priority
but share roadway space with motor
vehicles. Shared roadway bicycle markings
on the pavement as well as traffic calming
features such as speed humps and
traffic diverters keep these streets more
comfortable for bicyclists.

CLASS IV SEPARATED BIKEWAY
Separated bikeways are on-street bicycle
facilities that are physically separated from
motor vehicle traffic by a vertical element
or barrier, such as a curb, bollards, or
vehicle parking aisle. They can allow for
one-or two-way travel on one or both sides
of the roadway.
0 17 i Existing Conditions and Network Needs i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 347 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Page 348 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Existing Bicyele Network
Today, Folsom has more than 130 miles of
designated bikeways. This intludes more
than 64 miles of existing Class I Shared Use
Paths and more than 50 miles of Class ll
Bicycle Lanes (Table 1).

The on-street bicycle network consists
mainly of Class ll Bicycle Lanes, most of
which are along major arterials with high
travel speeds and traffic volumes. Despite
providing limited separation from motor
vehicles, the existing bicycle lane network
is comprehensive, covering more than 800/o
of major roads within the city.
ln recent years. the city has started
investing in facilities that provide more
separation from motor vehicles. This
includes both Class llB Buffered Bicycle
Lanes, which provide additional visual
separation from general purpose travel
lanes, and Class lV Separated Bikeways,
which include physical separation. The
short segments of Class lV Separated
Bikeways exist along Blue Ravine Road-
connecting the Oak Parkway Trail at
Arrowsmith Drive to the path at Manseau
Drive-and along Leidesdorff Street in
the Historic District. While these facilities
improve separation and comfort for
people biking, they currently are limited to
short segments throughout the city and do
not always connect to other low-stress bike
facilities.

Within neighborhoods, local roads provide
lower-stress routes for travel within
neighborhoods. Lower posted speeds,
fewer motor vehicles, and narrow rights-
of-way contribute to more comfortable
bicycling conditions. These routes also
provide connections to neighborhood
destinations, such as schools and parks.

However, limited connectivity of low-stress
routes across major roadways limits the
utility of these routes and reduces the
number of connections to destinations
beyond the local area.
ln addition to the on-street network,
Folsom also has a comprehensive off-
street shared use path network. Many of
these paths follow creeks (Humbug-Willow
Creek Trail), railroad corridors, and Lake
Natoma/American River (American River
Bike Trail). This network forms the core of
the bicycle network and connects residents
both locally and regionally, providing low-
stress routes for all trip types.

Table 1 Existing Bikeways in Folsom
I
Class I Shared
Use Path (Path)
Class ll Bicycle Lane
Class llB Buffered
Bicycle Lane
Class lll Shared
Bikeway
Class lV Separated
Bikeway

50.3 59.7

3.6 0.9

0.5 However, this network is not complete,
with gaps in locations across the network,
and is limited in its connections to
commercial areas.

A description of bikeway types is included
on page 1Z and the existing bikeways are
shown in Figure 3.

Facility Type
Existing
Mileage
19 i Existing Conditions and Network Needs i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 349 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
:
oz
Figure 3 Existing Bikeways
Project Area

FOLSOM ATP
Existing Bikeways
-
Class I
Shared Use Path
-
Class ll
Bicycle Lane
-
Class llB
Buffered Bicycle Lane
-
Class lll
Bicycle Route
-
Class lV
Separated Bikeway
Destinations + Boundaries
City Hall
Community Center
School
Light Rail Station
City Boundary
Park
fusse/
Ranch
@
oo
@
;--'-::----:
m
Station
Elementary- - . '
-t
'.d"'1..
l-l-t-lMtLES Ao -l'.s 'i''"-- N
Data provided by the City of Folsom, SACOG
City of Folsorn Active Transportation Plan I Existing Conditions and Network Needs | 20

Page 350 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Existing Pedestrian Network
A comprehensive pedestrian network
includes the many elements that support
travel to places people want to go.

This includes sidewalks and paths that
pedestrians travel along, as well as the
features that support travel across a
street, such as curb ramps, crosswalks,
traffic signals, and pedestrian signal heads.

Each of these elements are a vital piece of
helping pedestrians of all ages and abilities
connect to schools, parks, employment,
transit, and more.

Some of the major arterials such as
Folsom Boulevard, Folsom-Auburn
Road, Greenback Lane, and large
sections of Oak Ave Parkway, E Natoma
Street, and Broadstone Parkway lack
sidewalks either on both sides or one
side ofthe street.

The majority of Folsom north of Lake
Natoma and the Folsom Historic
District, such as the American River
Canyon and Valley Pines neighborhoods,
do not have any sidewalks.
ln addition to the sidewalk network,
Folsom's shared use paths provide low-
stress connections for people walking.

However, entrances may be difficult
to access for pedestrians, due to lack
of crosswalks and pedestrian signals
across major roadways; limited sidewalk
connections leading to the path; and
the trailhead requires significant out of
direction travel, limiting the utility of the
path as an alternate route.

While there is not comprehensive data
representing sidewalk locations within
neighborhoods, most residential areas
include sidewalks, with the exception
of residential streets north of Lake
Natoma, such as the American River
Canyon and Valley Pines neighlrorhoods.

Neighborhoods generally support
low-stress routes, however the lack of
sidewalks in some areas can limit the utility
of these routes for children, people who
use assisted mobility devices, etc.

I
While many major roadways in Folsom
have a sidewalk on at least one side of the
roadway, there are many areas that have
incomplete sidewalk networks or do not
have any sidewalks. Data depicting existing
sidewalks along arterials and within the
Folsom Historic District was collected as
part of this plan. This is shown in Figure 4.

Key findings of this data review include:

Most residential streets in the Folsom
Historic District lack sidewalks.
21 ; Existing Conditions and Network Needs 1 City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 351 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Figure 4 Existing Sidewolks and
Pedestrian Borriers
Pedestrian Barriers

FOLSOM ATP
Existing Pedestrian Barriers
-
Sidewalk Missing
(Both sides)
-
Sidewalk Missing
(One side)
-
ArterialRoadway
Existing Pedestrian Network
-
Path (paved)
FullSidewalk
Destinations + Boundaries
City Hall
Community Center
School
Light RailStation
City Boundary
Park
,t'
I
;:l-r.
3 @
oo
@
i""i
:,----:
il
)
Station o
A
N.5 1
,
Data provided by the City of Folsom, SACOG
City of Folsom Artive TraRsport€tion Plan I Existing Conditions and Network Needs | 22

Page 352 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Network Comfort
The Existing Conditions review provides
insight into how complete the active
transportation network ls today. However,
evaluation of network comfort through the
Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) provides greater
insight into opportunities to develop an all
ages and abilities network. The LTS analysis
refers to the perceived comfort level of a
roadway based on factors such as vehicle
travel speed on the roadway, the width of
the roadway, and provision of space for
bicycles.T A roadway with fewer lanes for
motor vehicles, lower posted speeds, and
greater separation from motor vehicles is
considere d most comfortable, while high
speeds and mixed traffic conditions are
least comfortable. Generally, LTS 1 and LTS
2 are considered low stress, while LTS 3
and LTS 4 are high-stress roadways.

These scores guide understanding of
who might bike along a roadway. The
Four Types of Cyclists, shown in Figure
5, consider one's interest and comfort
bicycling. The majority of the population-
those who are interested but concerned-
are most likely to be comfortable biking
only on low stress (LTS 1 and LTS 2)
roadways.

A bicycle LTS analysis was conducted to
provide insight into network gaps or focus
areas for improving the bicycle network.

The main findings from the LTS analysis, as
shown in Frgure 6, include:
. Neighborhood roadways are typically
low stress.

Many minor collectors are high stress,
with an LTS score of 3. Examples include
two lane roadways such as Willow Creek
Drive, Sibley Street, and Silberhorn
Drive.

Major arterials are high stress. While
many major arterials include designated
Class ll Bicycle Lanes, factors such as
high motor vehicle speeds and number
of lanes result in high-stress routes for
bicyclists. Examples include East Bidwell
Street, Blue Ravine Road, Oak Avenue
Parkway, lron Point Road, and Folsom-
Auburn Road.
0 Figure 5 The Four Types of Cyclists
lnterested but
Concerned
Comfortable on paths
and streets with buffered
or separated bikeways;
interested in biking more.

Not currently lnterested
Physically unable or very
uncomfortable biking, even
on streets with separated
bi keways.

Strong & Fearless
Very comfortable and willing
to ride on streets with no
designated bike facilities.

Enthusiastic & Confident
Very comfortable riding
but prefer streets with
designated bike lanes.
23 i Existing Conditions and Network Needs i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 353 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Figure 6 Bicycle Level of
Traffic Stress
Bicycle Level of
Traffic Stress

FOLSON/IATP
Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress
(BLTS) Score
-
LTS 1: AllAges and Abilities
-
LTS 2: Average Adult
M LTS 3: Confident Adult
-
LTS 4: Fearless Adult
Destinations + Boundaries
City Hall
Community Center
School
Light Rail Station
City Boundary
Park
'Fotsorrt
'-Laker"
t
I
I
I
clenn
@
ooo
Folsom Lake
State Rec Area -
Mississippi Bar
Station
,
I
I
I
lron
Lalce
Natona
+o
I-I-I-]MILES00.5 1
A
N
r
"t
TI\,
Data provided by the City of Folsorr, SACOG
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan Fxisting Conditions and Network Needs , 24

Page 354 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Low Stress Bicycle Network and Barrier Roadways O
The results of the LTS analysis clearly
identify the barrier that major roadways
present for travel within Folsom. These
roadways, typically scoring as high stress
(LIS 4), disrupt travel along lower stress
routes, and limit connections between
neighborhoods and to destinations. This
can be seen in Figure 6, where high-
stress roadways are shown in red (LTS
4) and yellow (LTS 3). This map shows
that destinations within neigh borhoods,
such as smaller neighborhood parks and
schools, are accessible via low-stress local
streets. Destinations that require travel
outside of a particular neighborhood are
difficult to access because distances are far
and require travel along or across high-
stress arterials.

Low-stress travel-either along local
residential streets or paths-is possible
across some high-stress roadways where
there are protected crossings. Protected
crossings are places where dedicated
signals exist or where the crossing is
separated from the roadway. Examples
include:

Crossing Riley Street at Sutter Street
Folsom Historic District
. Humbug Willow Creek Trail overcrossing
of East Bidwell Street (south of Blue
Ravine Road)
. Humbug Willow Creek Trail
undercrossing of East Bidwell Street
(south of Creekside Drive)
. Folsom Parkway Rail Trail signalized
crossing of Parkshore Drive
More typically, however, low stress travel is
not possible across high-stress roadways
because of unprotected crossings where
no dedicated signals or separated
crossings exist. Examples include:

The crossing of Folsom-Auburn Road
connecting Berry Creek Drive to
Jedediah Smith Memorial Trail
The path along Natomas Ditch at lron
Point Road
The crossing of American River Canyon
Drive at Crow Canyon Drive
Path crossing of Oak Avenue Parkway
(just south of Blue Ravine Road)
The crossing of Blue Ravine Road at Big
Valley Road
An additional barrier is crossing Highway

50. Crossings of Highway 50 at Prairie
City Road and East Bidwell Street are
currently high stress. As the area south of
Highway 50 continues to grow, as outlined
in the Folsom Plan Area, it has become
critically important to provide low stress
travel for residents across Highway 50 in
order to access the rest of Folsom. Plan
recommendations consider opportunities
to improve travel along and across the
major, high-stress roadways in Folsom
in order to expand low stress travel to
schools, light rail, shopping, and other
destinations.
25 Existing Conditions and Network Needs I City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 355 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Safety
ln addition to identifying high-stress
corridors, it's also important to understand
where safety concerns are greatest
on Folsom's roadways. A review of the
reported collisions between 2015 and
20198 in Folsom provides insight into
locations with high frequencies of collisions
involving people walking or biking, as
well as where the most severe collisions
are occurring in the city. This analysis
only includes data on reported collisions.

It is important to note that bicycle and
pedestrian collisions summarized here
only reflect those that are reported; this
analysis does not consider near-misses or
unreported collisions.

While people wolking ond biking
were involved in only 4.80/o (144
out of 2,948) of all collisions, they
occounted for 100/o of oll injury
collisions ond 25ok (25 out of 95)
of collisions resulting in the victim
being killed or severely injured (KSl).

CO LLISIONS CHARACTERISTICS

AND TRENDS
Severity
There were a total of 2,948 reported
collisions between 2015 and 2019 in
Folsom, including 144 collisions involving
someone walking (52) or biking (92).

Generally, crashes involving people
bicycling (92) occurred at nearly twice
the frequency of those involving people
walking (52). Howevel pedestrians were
involved more often in KSI collisions than
bicyclists (15 and 10 respectively).

Collision Location
Pedestrian- and bicycle-involved collisions
during this time period occurred most
often at intersections. ln fact, more
than 750/o of these collisions occurred
at an intersection (1'10), as opposed to
along a roadway (34). Collisions that
occurred along a roadway, however, were
generally more severe, with a slightly
higher percentage QA.sa/o or 7 out of 34)
of collisions along a roadway resulting in
serious injury or fatalities compared to
those that occurred at an intersection ('160lo
or 18 out of 110).

Time of Collision
Bicycle- and pedestrian-involved collisions
occurred more often during the day (111)
than at night (33). However, collisions
occurring at night were more severe,
particularly for pedestrians. For example,
430/o (9 out of 21) of collisions occurring at
night and involving a pedestrian resulted
in serious injury or fatality, compared to
13o/o (14 out of 11 1) of pedestrian collisions
occurring during the day.

Cause of Collision
Contributing factors refer to potential
causes of the collision and are recorded by
the reporting officer. They do not describe
blame or fault but do reflect aspects of
the built environment, environmental
conditions, or human behavior that
contributed to the collision. Within Folsom,
the most common contributing factors
include:
. Driver failing to yield right-of-way to a
pedestrian in a legal crosswalk
People walking not yielding right-of-way
to vehicles outside of a crosswalk
People biking against the direction of
traffic
9 8. statewicle lntegrated Traffic Records system (SWITRS) City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan i Existing Conditions and Network Needs j 26

Page 356 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

While not as common, improper
turning movements were also noted
often, particularly in connection with
unsignalized intersections. Understanding
these factors is important in identifying
possible solutions-or countermeasures
-to improve roadway safety. Provision of
more crossing opportunities with marked
crosswalks and provision of a complete
and connected bicycle network should be
considered in plan recommendations and
implementation strategies.

Presence of Bicycle Facilities
More than 780/o (72 out of 92) of bicycle-
involved collisions occurred on corridors
with bicycle lanes, including 800/o (8 out of
10) of KSI collisions involving people biking.

Collisions Near Schools
The number and severity of collisions
involving school-aged people walking
or biking were investigated within one-
quarter mile of each elementary, middle,
and high school in Folsom. While Folsom
Cordova K-8 Community Charter and
Folsom Lake High School had the greatest
number of bicycle- and pedestrian-
involved collisions, Natoma Station
Elementary, Empire Oaks Elementary, and
Folsom High School had collisions with the
greatest severity.

COLLISION FOCUS AREAS
Figure 7 and Figure B that follow show
areas for further focus based on both
collision frequency and severity for each
mode. Areas shown in red depict these
focus areas and include:

Pedestrian Collision Focus Areas
Folsom Boulevard from Natoma Street
to Greenback Lane
Natoma Street from Reading Street to
Wales Drive
East Bidwell Street from Coloma Street
to Blue Ravine Road
Bicycle Collision Focus Areas
. Greenback Lane from Main Street (city
limits)to American River Canyon Drive
. Folsom-Auburn Road from Greenback
Lane to Folsom Lake Crossing
Riley Street from Sutter Street to Wales
Drive
East Bidwell Street from Market Street
to Harrington Way
lron Point Road from Williard Drive to
Buckingham Way
As shown in the following figures, the
collision focus areas for both bicycle-
and pedestrian-involved collisions are
located on major roadways-all of which
are high stress according to the LTS
analysis on page 21, Consistentwith the
collision trends highlighted in the previous
section, the majority of bicycle collision
focus areas are located on roadways
with existing bicycle lanes;the remaining
corridors do not have any existing bicycle
i nfrastructu re.
ln addition to the focus areas, the map also
identifies other locations where either KSI
collisions occurred or a high frequency of
collisions occurred.
27 ; Existing Conditions and Network Needs i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 357 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Figure 7 Pedestrian Collisisn
Focus Areos
Pedestrian-
lnvolved Collisions

FOLSOM ATP
Fatality
Pedestrian-lnvolved Collision
Collision Focus Area
Existing Bikeways
-
Class I Paved Shared Use Path
Destinations + Boundaries
@ City Hall
O Community Center
O School
O Light Rail Station
:::j City Boundary
m Park
Data provided by the City of Folsom, SACOG
o
a
9r
'-4 t
?il
Station
.a'*
-""4
l--l-l-l vtr-Es A
h{.--d'
I
I o o.5
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Existing Conditions and Network Needs | 28

Page 358 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Figure 8 Bicycle Collision Facus
Areos
Bicycle-lnvolved
Collisions

FOLSOM ATP
Fatality
Bicycle-l nvolved Collision
Collision Focus Area
Existing Bikeways
n Class I Paved Shared Use Path
-
Class ll Bicycle Lane
-
Class llB Buffered Bicycle Lane
n Class lll Bicycle Route
-
Class lV Separated Bikeway
Destinations + Boundaries
@ City Hall
O Community Center
O School
1@ Light RailStation
i::! City Boundary
ffi Park
-a--.---
o
a
Station
*-t
t,-" l-l-J--lvtt-esoo.5 I
A
N{*d'--1.,Data provided by the City of Folsom, SAcoG
29 | Existing Conditions and Network Needs I City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 359 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Summary of Challenges and Opportunities I
The Existing Conditions analysis outlined
in this chapter identifies several key
opportunities and challenges for the
bicycle and pedestrian network in Folsom
ln summary, these include the following:

Opportunities
Enhance the already extensive shared
use path network to be complete, with
connections to destinations such as
commercial centers, schools, parks, and
tra n sit.

Develop an on-street bikeway network
that is low stress, with particular focus
on upgrading Class ll Bicycle Lanes on
high-stress roadways and improving
connections to shared use paths.
lmprove connections to and from the
three Sacramento Regional Transit Gold
Line Light Rail stations.

Build upon the existing active
recreational community by enhancing
the shared use path network and
improving bicycle and pedestrian
connections to parks and shared use
paths.

Challenges
. Arterials are high-stress roadways
lntersections and crossings, particularly
along major arterials, are challenging
for people walking and biking.

Many existing standard Class ll Bicycle
Lanes are located on high-stress
roadways.

Sidewalk gaps limit connections to
commercial centers, jobs, and the
Historic District.

The active community is focused
more heavily on recreation instead
of biking and walking for everyday
transportation.

The street network-with cul-de-sacs,
winding roadways, and high-stress
roadways-has limited connectivity
between destinations.

These opportunities and challenges inform
the plan recommendations in Chapter 5.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Existing Conditions and Network Needs | 30

Page 360 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
>
Chapter IV I Community Engagement

Page 361 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Process Overview
Throughout the ATP process, Folsom
residents and visitors were invited to
share their experiences with and vision
for the city's active transportation
network. Through in-person events and
online forums, members of the public
provided input at every phase of the plan.

This chapter provides an overview of
engagement opportunities and a summary
of key trends of feedback received.

Engagement occurred in two primary
phases:

Phase 1: During this phase, project staff
provided information about the plan,
gathered input on key questions, and
answered questions about the process.

Staff also asked how people travel today,
including community-specific needs and
challenges.

Phase 2: During this phase, community
members were encouraged to review draft
plan goals and proposed location-specific
project recommendations, and to indicate
anything missing and their highest priority
projects.

The engagement strategy included both
in-person and virtual events to provide
multiple opportunities to participate while
adhering to public health guidance. Each
event considered the city's active
transportation system comprehensively;
at each event or input opportunity,
questions sought feedback on the
bicycle, pedestrian, and path networks
simultaneously to better understand how
the networks work together. Participants
provided more than 2,500 comments
through digital tools. ln-person and
virtual events were promoted through
city channels, including the city website,
social media pages, and city's newsletters.

The four main methods for collecting
community feedback included:

POP-UP EVENTS
Events were held to share information and
receive comments and feedback. Pop-
events included two path pop-up events at
Humbug Willow Creek Trail and two pop-
up events at the Folsom Farmers Market.

These pop-up events took place at existing
community gatherings and aimed to reach
as many residents as possible by meeting
community members where they are.

PUBLIC WORKSHOPS
The Public Workshop provided a more
traditional opportunity for public
engagement. These events include a brief
presentation followed by unstructured
time to review project materials, ask
questions about the planning process, and
provide feedback. The Phase 'l workshop
was held in-person at City Lion's Park
in Folsom. The Phase 2 workshop was
conducted online.

STAKEHOLDER GROUP
The Stakeholder Group guided the
planning process. lncluding Folsom
residents and active transportation
advocates in the community, this group
of nearly 40 people helped shape the
vision and goals, engagement methods,
and recommendations. Stakeholder
Group meetings took place during the two
outreach phases.

I
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Community Engagement | 32

Page 362 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

ONLINE ENGAGEMENT
ln addition to pop-up events, workshops,
and stakeholder group meetings, Folsom
community members had the opportunity
to share feedback through an online tool
during both engagement phases. This
tool introduced the plan purpose and
timeline; it also featured an interactive
map for participants to share feedback
about specific locations across the city.

During Phase 1 of outreach, community
members were asked to draw routes.
identify barriers to walking and biking
on an online interactive map, and share
other comments about what they would
like to see. During Phase 2 of outreach,
Folsom community members provided
feedback on draft plan goals and proposed
reco m mendations.

Nearly 500 comments were shared during
both phases of engagement. Further,
the online tool encouraged additional
interaction among participants, providing
the opportunity to comment, "like," or
"dislike" input shared by others. ln total,
more than 2,500 points of interaction
occurred using these tools.

Confirm understanding of the existing
network, including pedestrian facilities,
on-street bikeways, and paths.

Develop a more comprehensive
understanding of where residents
would like to walk, bike, or roll.

Table 2 Phase 1 Public Outreoch Events
lnteractive Web Map folsomatp.alta pla nning.cloud/#/
Gain insight into current network
challenges, such as network
connectivity or safety concerns.

Learn which facility types and types
of improvements are preferred by the
public.
lnform plan goals and project
recommendations.

April, 15,2021 through
)uly 31,2021
May 1,2021
June 5,2021
)une 17,2021
)une 26,2021
PHASE 1
Goals
Pop-up Event #1
Pop-up Event #2
Stakeholder Meeting #1
Public Workshop #1
Folsom Farmers Market
Humbug Willow Creek Trail
Virtual Meeting through Zoom
Lions Park
Event DateEvent LocationEvent Type
33 I Community Engagement i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 363 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

What We Heard
Throughout the ATP process, Folsom
community members shared a range of
feedback, concerns, and support ofthe
plan goals and project recommendations.

There were consistent themes throughout
the outreach process, including the
following:
. Safety was a common concern,
particularly along major roadways and
locations with high motor vehicle travel
speeds.
. Similarly, many community members
indicated the need for more crossings
and improved safety at crossings.
. Community members were interested in
improved sidewalk network connectivity
to popular destinations. Respondents
shared that current conditions do not
allow for seamless connections to areas
that community members travel to
most.

Overall, community members were
interested in improving access to paths
including improving existing crossings,
new mid-block crossings, and improved
pedestrian and bicycle connections to
paths.

Community members shared their
concerns around safety when riding
their bicycles around Folsom. Some of
their insights included lack of dedicated
crossings for bikes, the need for
designated bike facilities, and greater
protection for on street facilities.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Community Engagement | 34

Page 364 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

PHASE 2
Goals
Gather feedback on proposed
plan goals and draft project
reco m mendations.

Gain further insight into the challenges
and opportunities associated with plan
implementation.

Learn which project recommendations
are priorities for the public.
lnform the public and gather
feedback on specific types of
potential improvements including:
intersection, connectivity, and
crossing improvements for
bicyclists and pedestrians; program
recommendations; and bicycle facility
types.

Table 3 Phase 2 Public Outreoch Events
lnteractive Web Map folsomalp.altaplanning.cloudi#/
Pop-up Event #3
Pop-up Event #4
Stakeholder Meeting #2
Public Workshop #2
Humbug Willow Creek Trail
Folsom Farmers Market
Virtual Meeting through Zoom
Virtual meeting, via Zoom
November 12, 2021 through
January 3,2022
November 13,2021
November 13,2021
December 8,2A21
December 16,2CI21
What We Heard
Project Cost and lmplementation:

Throughout Phase 2 of outreach, the
majority of community members were
interested in learning how projects will
be funded. They were also interested in
how the ATP project costs fits within the
larger city budget.

Spot lmprovements: Community
members are interested in project
recommendations that connect them
to different active transportation
destinations throughout the city.

The most popular proposed spot
improvement is on Folsom-Auburn
Road and connects community
members to Folsom Lake Paths.

Sidewalk lmprovements: Community
members are interested in improved
network connectivity to popular
destinations. The most popular
pedestrian sidewalk proposed projects
are located on East Natoma Street,
Green Valley Road, Oak Avenue
Parkway, and Greenback Lane.

Shared Use Path lmprovements:

Community members were interested
in improving the access, width and
condition of shared use paths, as well
as improving the conflicts between path
users.

These key themes and other results from
the community engagement process not
only helped inform the ATP's goals and
objectives, but also informed project
recommendations and prioritization.

Event DateEvent LocationEvent Type
35 ; Community Engagement i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 365 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan i Community Engagement i 36

Page 366 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.
>
Chapter V I Recommendations

Page 367 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

The recommended active transportation
system in Folsom seeks to improve safety
and comfort for all users through network
improvements (physical infrastructure) and
programs and policies (non-infrastructure).

These recommendations are developed
based on previous plans, results of the
existing conditions analysis, and the public
input.

The sections that follow outline the
recommended infrastructure and non-
infrastructure components of the active
transportation network that aim to make
biking and walking an integral part of
everyday life for people who live, work,
and visit Folsom.

Network lmprovements: Capital projects that are identified along the street and path network (linear recommendations) and at specific locations (spot recom mendations). Network improvements include the following:
. Linear bicycle recommendations: On-street bikeways and paths . Linear pedestrian recommendations: New and enhanced sidewalks ' Spot recommendations (bicycle and pedestrian): Specific intersections, path connections, or mid-block locations for improvement; may include new or improved crossings, improved access to destinations, or specific safety improvements Programs and Policies: lnitiatives that support a well-functioning active transportation system and improve outcomes for each capital investment.

Programs can provide education about how to get around by bike or by foot, including route options, safety tips, and how to connect with other modes, like transit. Programs also provide encouragement, whether it's helping connect people through walking or bicycling groups, incentives for trying out other ways to get around, or supporting the choice to walk or bike more generally, Policies address issues such as the longevity of the city's investment in the active transportation network, access and use of the network, the design standards for the network, and evaluation of the active tra nsportation network.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Recommendations i 38

Page 368 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Bieycle and Shared Use Path Network Improvements I
Recommended improvements to the
bicycle network, shown in Figure 9, seek
to improve network connectivity, increase
low-stress network connections, and
support safer and more comfortable
travelfor people bicycling. The proposed
network includes a combination of on-
street improvements. enhanced paths, and
new off-street shared use paths.

The recommended network builds on
the backbone of existing paved shared
use paths and expands connections to
the path system through low-stress on-
street connections. Paths located along
creeks, rail corridors, and roadways
support more direct routes and improved
recreational opportunities. Low-stress
on-street facilities, such as Class lllB
Bicycle Boulevards and Class lV Separated
Bikeways, support connections to the path
network.

A network of Class lV Separated Bikeways
provides greater separation for travel
along major roadways, connecting to
the path network and other destinations
such as transit, shopping centers, office
parks, and the Folsom Historic District.

Where a separated bikeway may not be
desired or feasible, other facilities such
as Class llB Buffered Bicycle Lanes, Class ll
Bicycle Lanes, and Class lll Bicycle Routes
supplement the low-stress bicycle network.

The proposed bicycle network, including
the specific bicycle facility types. was
informed by public input, the existing
conditions (needs) analysis, typical roadway
conditions, plan goals, and best practices
in bikeway design. While low stress
facilities and greater levels of protection
are desirable across the city, development
patterns, available right-of-way, and other
constraints may require different bikeway
treatments. Further, some locations may
require further analysis of on-street
Table 4 Bicycle Facility Miles by Classification
parking needs to better allocate available
pavement for the movement of residents
and visitors. For more information,
reference the Design Guide in Appendix A
This Plan recommends 145 miles of new or
upgraded bicycle facilities across Folsom,
proposing upgrades to about 37 miles of
existing facilities and adding about 108
miles of new bikeways. Table 5 provides an
overview of the proposed bicycle network
broken down by bikeway class. When fully
built out, Folsom will have over 200 miles
of dedicated bicycle facilities that form a
connected network.

Class I Shared Use Path (Path)
Class ll Bicycle Lane
Class llB Buffered Bicycle Lane
Class lll Shared Bikeway
Class lllB Bicycle Boulevard
Class lV Separated Bikeway
Total

50.3 59.7

3.6 0.9

0.0 0.5
129.4

39.9 2.3

3.7 0.6

24.8 36.7
108

0.0 35.5

1.5 0.0

0.0 0.0
a-7

90.2 26.5
l-7

1.5 24.8

37.2 200.3
Existing
Mileage
Proposed
Mileage
Full Buildout
MileageFacility Type M
Upgraded
39 J Recommendations i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 369 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

BICYCLE BOUTEVARDS
Bicycle boulevards provide an all ages and abilities route along neighborhood roadways. With lower travel speeds and fewer cars, these routes are designed to prioritize bicycle travel.

Bicycle Boulevards include three main components:
. Speed Management and Traffic Calming, including reduced speed limits, speed tables (1), chicanes (2), and more to increase route comfort and safety . Volume Management, to discourage cut-through traffic and limit non-localtrips . Bicycle and Pedestrian Priority at tntersections, including improved crossing infrastructure (3) to support safe crossings at major roadways ln combination with wayfinding, bicycle boulevards not only support connections to neighborhood destinations but also provide on-street connections to shared use paths to create a complete, connected bicycle network. For more information on the components of a bicycle boulevard, see Appendix A.
-A
m
Pavement Marki
Traffic Circle
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Recommendations ! 40

Page 370 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Figure 9 Proposed Bikeways
Proposed Bikeways

FOLSOIVI ATP
Proposed Bikeways
r - r Class I Shared Use Path
Class ll Bicycle Lane
r d il Class llB Buffered Bicycle Lane
!s F tr Class lll Bicycle Route
- r r Class lllB Bicycle Boulevard
r r r Class lV Separated Bikeway
-
Widen Existing Path
Existing Bikeways
ffi Class I Shared Use Path
Class ll Bicycle Lane
Class llB Buffered Bicycle Lane
Class lll Bicycle Route
il Class lv separated Bikeway
Destinations + Boundaries
@ City Hall
O Community Center
O School
O Light Rail Stalion
::: j City Boundary
Pa rk
Data proviclecl by the Cily of Folsom, SACOG
E
tl
t
I
I
t
a
t
a,.L
$naA
t1
ot
:
oz
t
' Folsom3-- Lake '
t
I
t
tIt
) l1

NATOMA T
I
I
Emprrc
Oaks ,
tl
I
t
-6-
tI
I 9\
t
q
(-
ou
I
t
I
I
!
I,
I ,
1 c Susse/t
,
I
Falsom Lake
State Rec
- Misisippi lron
Statian
Natoma
t
I
I
J
I
t
tz
,
a ,
\I
( t
,
1 ,1,
41 Recommendations , City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 371 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Shared Used Path Enhancements 0
Shared use paths form the backbone
of the low-stress active transportation
network in Folsom. ln addition to nearly 40
miles of proposed new shared use paths,
the plan also recommends enhancements
to existing corridors, as shown in Figure 9.

Locations of enhanced shared use path
segments include along the Humbug-
Willow Creek Trail, Folsom RailTrail, and
Oak Parkway Trail.

Shared use path enhancements not only
improve the quality of existing paths
but also seek to improve the safety and
comfort for all user groups.

Shared use paths with a high volume and
variety of users are good candidates for
enhancements. Unlike on-street bikeways
or sidewalks, shared use paths include
people walking, biking, and rolling. A
popular shared use path, for example,
can create tension and discomfort among
users, especially when there is limited
space and users are traveling at a wide
range of speeds. Path enhancements
can include a variety of measures such
as increasing the path width, adding
a shoulder, centerline striping, and
separating users. Shared use path
enhancements can also include wayfinding
and/or policy changes to improve user
experience. Wayfinding improvements can
include directional pavement markings and
other types of signage to guide users, while
policy and related promotional campaigns
can encourage users to share the path.

For more information, see the Policy and
Programs section.
ln addition to the enhancements
mentioned above. shared use paths
also provide an opportunity to integrate
green stormwater infrastructure into
the path design. Green infrastructure
is a catchall term that describes
sustainable stormwater management
practices and infrastructure. Through
strategies including biofiltration planters,
bioretention swales, trees, native
landscaping, and permeable pavement
surfaces, more water can return to the
ground and natural systems while reducing
strain on existing water systems.

Some of the benefits of green
infrastructure include:

Reduces the surface temperature of the
street/path and the surrounding area.
lmproves water quality, air quality,
and reduces energy use by capturing
stormwater runoff.

Provides habitat for a variety of insects
and birds and improves habitat in local
watersheds.
lmproves mental and physical health
through better air quality, shade and
cooler temperatures, beautification, and
contact with nature.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan Recommendations I 42

Page 372 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Centerline striping along a shqred use path in Folsom helps to communicate that users should expecttrqvel in both directions ond encourages users to travel on the right ond poss on the left.

Delineating separate spaces for pedestrions and bicyclists can help olleviate conflict among modes in high use areqs. This can be completed through pavement morkings or use of different mctterials to clearly designate space.

Povement signage further emphasizes that the path is bi-directionql ond shsred among a variety of users. While this does not creqte additionol space, it provides reminders of poth etiquette along the length of the path.

A soft-surfoce shoulder alongside q shared use poth provides odditional space for path users, porticularly runners or others who prefer natural surfoce paths. 43 | Recommendations i City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 373 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Pedestrian Network
Sidewalks form the foundation of the
pedestrian network, connecting residents
to destinations such as schools, transit,
parks, and shopping. Pedestrian Network
recommendations build on the sidewalk
inventory completed during the existing
conditions phase of this plan and identify
opportunities to complete the sidewalk
network along the corridors inventoried.

Recommendations shown in Figure 10
include completion of the sidewalk
network on both sides of the roadway
to provide a complete and connected
pedestrian network and enhanced
connections to and from the path network.

This includes completing sidewalks along
most residential streets in the Folsom
Historic District and sections of major
arterials both north and south of the
Historic District such as Folsom Boulevard,
Folsom-Auburn Road, Greenback Lane,
and large sections of Oak Ave Parkway,
East Natoma Street, and Broadstone
Parkway.

This Plan recommends 21.5 miles of new or
upgraded sidewalks across Folsom, which
includes 11.7 miles of filling sidewalk gaps
on both sides of the street and 9.8 miles
of filling sidewalk gaps on one side of the
street.

Corridor sidewalk recom mendations
should be considered in coordination
with spot recommendations (outlined in
the next section) to further facilitate a
connected network in Folsom and improve
access to the city's path system.

I
City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan i Recommendations 44

Page 374 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Figure 10 Proposed Sidewalks
Proposed Walking Network
lmprovements

FOLSOM ATP
Proposed Pedestrian
lmprovements
e Fill in Sidewalk Gaps
(Both Sides)
-
Fill in Sidewalk Gaps
(One Side)
Proposed Shared Use Paths
r r - Class I Shared Use Path
Existing Shared Use Paths
-
Class lShared Use Path
Destinations + Boundaries
City Hall
Community Center
School
Light Rail Station
City Boundary
Park
Data provided by the City of Folsom, SACOG
f
n
I
--1.,'
I
--l
\
I I
E$ !
1 I
t
I
I
'k
:* _*
t
1 t
ta
@
oo
@
:-___:
t
a
I
Station
I
I
i
I
I
I
?
I
i
I
I
--f\-
I
T
a
t
?
45 | Recommendations I City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan r*]-r-lMtLES Ao -o.s i'"--- N

Page 375 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Interseetion and Crossing Improvements I
lntersection and crossing improvements
are crucial to a complete and connected
active transportation network. This
includes upgrading existing crosswalks
to provide safer crossing opportunities,
installing new crosswalks at high-
demand locations, and facilitating access
to the shared use path network along
major roadways. The recommendations
identified seek to improve the comfort
and safety of intersections; enhance
network connectivity; and provide access
to destinations.
ln addition to supporting a complete and
connected low-stress network, intersection
improvements were also one of the most
commonly-requested improvements
during the public engaSement phase of
this plan.

The resulting recommendations (Figure 11)
locate specific intersections, path
connections, or mid-block locations for
improvement and are intended to improve
conditions for both people walking
and people biking. Spot locations were
identified based upon factors such as a
history of collisions, high stress crossings,
access to key destinations, identification in
previous planning efforts, and connections
to and from linear recommendations such
as paths, sidewalks, and bikeways.
lntersection and Crossing lmprovements
are categorized based on the type of
roadway, whether or not there is a traffic
signal, if there is existing infrastructure to
support crossings, and if it provides direct
access to shared use paths. Overcrossings
or undercrossings are also identified
at locatlons that cross a major barrier
such as a highway, and therefore could
benefit from a crossing that is completely
separated from motor vehicle traffic.

The following tables identify the
recommended improvements associated
with each category. Each locatton should
be further analyzed as the project
advances through design to determine
the specific infrastructure needs. More
information about crossing treatments can
be found in Appendix A.

The following tables break down the
different types of spot recommendations
and potential design improvements.

City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan I Recommendations , 46

Page 376 ends

06/14/2022 Item No.15.

Minor Road
Path Spot Recommendations
These locations represent locations
where a path intersects with a roadway
It considers existing conditions of this
crossing, including existing traffic signal
locations, existing stop control and
crossing infrastructure, and roadway
functional classification.

Table 5 Path Spot Recommendations
Existi ng Traffic Signal
Unsignalized,
No Existing Crossing
lnfrastructure
Unsignalized, with
Existing Stop Control,
Crosswalk(s)
Unsignalized -
Existing High Visibility
Crosswalk and Refuge
lsland
Establish a dedicated bike crossing to reduce conflict with pedestrians.

Remove slip lanes and reduce curb radius to slow turning speeds Signal improvements, including pedestrian countdown signal, APS buttons, lengthening pedestrian crossing times and/or Leading Pedestrian lnterval, No Right on Red, and dedicated left turn phase where applicable lmplement high visibility crosswalks and upgrade curb ramps to comply with ADA standards as needed
lmprove visibility through liBhting and improved sight lines lmplement high visibility crosswalks and upgrade curb ramps to comply with ADA standards as needed
Evaluate opportunity for rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) or pedestrian hybrid beacon (PHB)
Shorten crossing distances through pedestrian refuge islands, curb extensions, and other traffic calming
lmprove visibility through lighting and improved sight lines lmplement high visibility crosswalks and upgrade curb ramps to comply with ADA standards as needed
Evaluate pedestrian hybrid beacon or rectangular rapid flashing beacon i nsta I lati o n
Shorten crossing distances through pedestrian refuge islands, curb extensions, and other traffic calming
Improve visibility through lighting and improved sight lines Evaluate pedestrian hybrid beacon or rectangular rapid flashing beacon installation
lnstall ADA compliant curb ramps
lmprove visibility through lighting and improved sight lines lmplement high visibility crosswalks and upgrade curb ramps to comply with ADA standards as needed
In-Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign
Reduce crossing distances through curb extensions and other traffic calming lmprove visibility through lighting and improved sight lines Description of lmprovementsType
47 Recommendations I City of Folsom Active Transportation Plan

Page 377 ends

Folsom City CouncilJune 14, 2022

Folsom City Council
June 14, 2022